Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Report 1
Doc=! 01:<0 16~h $AllS TAl P'-!U Il!ll l1'1:rr.'~ ~fr ftII' ~ " ..... YJ:;", r.:;:if1'r 'IItI\,S~1t · i '\ . "01 .. ,-. ~ . I~. r.I~~4 •• "Doth foal". 10" pllr.Io .... T tll.t" .. r op ...... t .. 1"0' I" .. r ... ' .... I, .. ,.10';' .. , ",., ....... "'"'' pr,.· .... 4 , .... 4' .. ,.' ........ a •• t. t •• r ... r ., 11, .. r., ... ,f--!i....,..r ... ". ~"r •••• " (, .. P •• ,~~ •• t .. I p4tgMr A ,4.!!... sr.,t" '" .............. 11 II. d ... h.'le" fr ... a ... ,. ... ", .. lhl, ••• 1.11l1li .... \ .... ,e. ..... I.' .. r .. f ....... ,A.' .. II .... ' '''101\1111 ", ,; • ..... II". ,r I'nll'·lpol. \11 PO\ ..... '" t. b. DO" her_ •• r .••• 11 It. u ..... ,Firat Federal layiplUl fJ leer· Rgpbm ',rch ,., " .. , I , .• 10"" ,I,u ..... III .... 11., ."T 41' ... , ,. _"1""" !Ik' ltUrchl~" 15:J'CCS: ,11 co r''-brfnrlc ,\d,,,,,,rw.,,? ali I .. '-mn:h '"~ ",!;a''''ru'-nn,.le •• nm, .. t t •• toe' m .. !r 111"'.n ,·r I.,. ~In,", of .id QNI:pp •. ir ISn,.: .t,., .. il '-"ft. a"" ~1eIft wid .... are abg,.1t a"MlllIN b~' I.ltu Ii 1'1\. ""'. otlt WbKb MI.l:'. ul'C1'KCCft 5:r.lr.I.tJ und C"ll4fjI. hrraftcr 1ItC"I ... 1t. Um un lhe"~. ~anr! :al,·. Illl"~'" _hi.-b ~_I"R'iirlct .. ~ ... f'd '6 mllD __ 1 ... ~ IIIr b)' I'fUCIIl 0'. ddotl"G'IIna Of' lbf obhpituf' ","n-I~ O"\t,," ... ,,,1. "ritn,. ~n·'llllC'nol. tt. h.b""hr hulIJiftI!" tmS' am ...... ~pIanrd apon lIM prrDIl ..... • "'·r .. .,wI, tAI"r .... U"ot It ..... '" d:ma~ l"] ft,..I •• ,I'C' f.ID in ..... h:eqhw ,,,,rectI. in the ~oIlM-""I~I , ... ·"drT. in all .... 1It"~nc-r tMiPU1 ... &:nun-CA _be ."aer f« Itt """'1\1 IIi ~ ID8I1ppo. the ",Itt,. antl1he It;tfoo i ... _t'r. iI" '''flr imwnt. 'lID, aPfdT. ur .... the puftIut ,'I'Kt .... full\' pard., aM to deII~ft"'" Mk ,tit' ''''''.'.U .• 't Pf'''oft.... rtfV1\'I,l •• anal pmtaUIII ~IP.""""''' mrh al arc l't'1\1irt,J to bc4elinn-d to We rntmColln' • I". Ilf "tel. llat hnihl"", _ .al' ctIbtt hDpn"rDII'N-.... tbe Pf"'IDitn 10 CUD" r.p:sir ami nnt to rwnaft ww~: "M 14 • ,.11 to ate 1M-J'I'ftIIha , .. Atl, iUrpl purse«. . h, tbt fYtf'I ,hall. putfhANI' I1aII fail to tta~ I."ort deli~ In, IUf:I Cd" aa~. Of all,. ,..,.- mel'll ...... l'Iirol to ..... mIIdr 011 .-ouat of ,lie ~~,., tt, rn. ...... da. fiftIUltc' G" aI."... fJfOI'ided. lbt ItIh:t nil)' N'" "11th taSft> and ........ = .... saaLc otncfl ra~ ucJ rl'm tilth Jmul'DlltC..nd lhe. ;anaonnt. p.1;;'1 .h"oI ...... hint m.u be dctIIIOII ...... of.1K-.......... """" sad -1")'IIIle 1oft1nr~~ "Ub 10_" .. IIw '., •• 1 'U po. _ .... _ .... a pjI"" _ .... ,""""' ... ~ riPt> Of -!If _ of _ loilurr. -~I f\ "'-... ' ... ~. . 1",):- .l :'1 k , .. j I , , -1 -, , , i i I "( . " ;, , .. Statutory W~ ~-....... . . ,', .. ; .... . ,;: .. TIlE GRASTOR S.:.uCHARo E. UEVES. ODd PJ\Tiic1AO.i£EVE5 •. hi~·';;f •• -:. •. '" • . . ..' I • • • . . ·r~· • .:.c..ln' i:~~~J:.[~ nt.:1'EN Dt:n~LA·RS'. :aftd Dtb'r .. I~~ ~¥. ~lWl.~~~ :.c·~lid~J'a:~ion· .. . i~.ha~ '~irf~ t\ln\~~·:.~··~~'.,." i~Bi'L~a 'P,~: \rA~C~ .~~ ·t?A'~~.~::E.: VACCA. b~a w.ile~ .Ihr .. f .. i~ dt-Kri~tI ;n.i·-~~.tt .• \l~lrd hi I..w' CoiI ... i) I;' . . ·Wuh!ilil1i.",'. . ... " . ",-; ~·ilt. of ": : .... 'Ea8~ balf. c)f., ~a~t' il •. · ~~~b~'r lA.lie Q4rden Tr~ctO:" .~c·co1!.d,tn. to.'pbt 10 r.eeo·rded. i.~ .volume' 9. crpLati.· pasa Z,S,',., in -Kbr,iCO,Wlty,: W.oMilston, . ¥. E:XCEPT.: the-:.o.uth;4$6 :lett: 91.\be. -••• i. 139; 07 'Ceet · ... el E·XCEP~r.'t.he :" " ~~.'i; l~:iee~: ~!,e'~~ con~.ye~ ~t¢' ,~ti',. :Count., ·~y';Ui'pt~~e~(r~cord~ci'~, . .'._', , ' under '~:~~,toJ'.'-. £U~:~~~ -'5~?~302.'f~",_1l1,t,b ~y~~tSo"~b'eII,ot,.'-::' ,', " ;,"'; :, SUB-aCT TO.' 'O~Pail1 'b:"~~n!=:~: ~~', ~ort8a8~ d.At~d·se~~~~~~:~ , axecutad ,by. R.iC::,~:~4 E:' ae,~~II' ,~U\~ ;~~ricia _~.' ,~e~.e~' •. hil, , " .E;ql,1itll;,ble ~,vin8a."'~ ,LO'il"~~,oOC,J,D,~I)Ii; 'a".Q~CI(JD~ ~orp,o_~a,t:lb~,.- : pa~el\t,:of '$l~. OOO~ .. ~<?~nd_ late:-:,~.t. 'r_ecord.~ S~pt.~q~T",Z,9., 1,64; volume,.916:o! ~DJ:tS"S~G. 'pase'qa., undeJ',aOditor,!o file No. '579199'1, , ~(~8 c'ountV';':;~'-.hln,stoa..; '~~ In·e-,e,~t,b·.a~one.,o(oQia:mortpie it' $.16,009.0 '0; Qrant-e'. herebi .Sree '6y ~he' 2Icc,e,tonce:of ,tbiD deed,:, to c' a'i.~j'ne,·ia.ld··n.~;'tga'i-~ ~nd' '61-6e:'-to :~ake -tbo: 'po ymento· .. ecordlnJi to :th~, , 'te.rni.s·a~d':conl;li~tD:n8 tbe.re~~" ,.':" -", .. ":,~.' ~ , . ~. >" ;+',-:. '" ' ··a~t't2u,~_ '".c(O, .. , ""S~>"':;&~i~.'~' ", " ~T-\iE Q .... , .I;o~y.ot ~B 4:~y(gj~~:,oi!Ii"'"""i...'" l\iCHARIi_E~: RnV~ ;I.lid'~A TlucLA O. IIE.J:VZS' . , .. . ' '.' , , , . ~ . ;'.. , ' ,'" ,.", j~J.1~~!i-,,,,",,,,,",'in '*"d:"'If1'~::-thr'~"~ ,~ MslfllrWM. lind, tbf -gflo..-i.~i. ~#.-':'.:,,: hft~' VIJ11.M\a1Y;t(1 ... d." fur ,~hr' '., ' , ,~, " "'-.:, .' ': Puget Sound Mutua! Savings Ban~ 922 Second Avenue Seattle, !'!"shington 98104 ATl'BN: Carol Hanson -' Ea~erbrecht -Vardeman 0ur0nlcrNo.421672 PRBLlMINARY COMMITMENT FOR TITLS INSURANCE W .......... Laad r .... :Iuoodmiaa 1'_ AmowIt Pnmium Sol .. Tax ToDI iX ) o.n;..' • ......r...I-.. $28,500.00 $162.25 $8.60· . $170.85 ( ) Pu..".,.... • ......r...I .......... ( ) M_p •• .....Lud ....... 1I" (X ) MOII!JDG'IO'. ATA_ .. $~5.600.00 $ 51.50 $3.05 $ 60.55 ( ) TQJI 1IogIaao ..... ( ) Dace: ~JV;h* i\'Hs.$ ToDI 8:00 A.M. $241.40 ERVIN E. J!GGBRBRECHT and SANDRA L. BGGBRsRECHT his wife' o subj_ only 10 me lxa:pdoua mownlu.reiB """............. . .,,4" __ P ·on. _~incd in ' ..... policy fonD. This _ .od CGIIIIIIicmalt sheI1 ha .. DO force .. a buia for ..... _ ~ h ....... ./"' The South 130 feet of the West 154.19 feot of tho Tract 13 of Panther Lar.s-Garden ,Tracts. as per plat rocorded in Volume 9 Df Plats, pago 25. records of octog County; Situate in the County of Xing, State of Washington. 1. EASEMENT, AND THE TElUIS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Disclosed by: Purpose: Area Affected: 2. DEED OF TRUST AND Grantor: f) Trustee: Beneficl~ry: Amount: Dated: TERMS Instrumont recorded under Auditor's Pile No. 5340813 Por ingress and ogress and for roadaay and utility purposes OVer, under and upon the Bast 15 feet of the propeTtyherein described to ·bo used with a like easement over the West 15 feet of the Bast Is of said 1ract 13. (No impairment) Ervin B. Bggebrecht and L. Eggebrecht, his vife,who acquired title as Brvin B. Bggerbreeht and Sandra L. Bggerbrecht, his wife; Transamorica Title Insurance Company Queen City Savings and Loan Association. ._ .. a_J:Orporation; $20 .. 400.00 June 25. 1910 .', _ PKlNEER NATIONAl gtm.E INSUIIANCE A ..... _ I'''' ..... 4i I II'~"":' ....... , 11"'''' '.,' ',1 HI,"" 'If n,,"Oro at R",uett 01 " !' -, . , ., ,··1 :-, , " , " ,~ ". ~ '~. %" . , ~; ~ ~ .~ ,!'\ ~ ... '" .. -... e .. .. AFTER RECORD/fIG HAIL TV. , . ,IiJ I FOaM: LIa, Statutory liITammlf DoQd 111& GRANTOR GEORCIHA S, COLBLLO, a. her·aep.rate eat.t • TER OOLLAR9 AJfD OTHER GOOD • HD VALUABLE c»RSIJltRATlOII. UINOR J. CILL, an umaanied woaan. KING Tract 1, and the North oae-half of Tract 2 of Panthor Lake Garde. Tr.1cts .ccord1ns to pl.t reeorded 1D Yoluce 9 of Plata, :'''88 25, tu ltas Coant,. U .. hinatOQ,' .... 1'OCnRta VIm aD .oaant tor tnsre •• and esr ••• DYer tho .eot 15 feet of the 'I-:':'at on.- half and the wat 15 feet of the eADt one-hilt of Tract 13 of aaid Panther t.Q Cardon Trae.ta. Ttla. dnd 1. ,.Y08 tn hUnJla ..... ' <ol aortal. rooa OalUO coDlnel bolvoOD lb. parth .• "o"to. doto' .18DUDry 25 • 18 77 • aD' oOD.l&loll" for &110 coonrOD •• or PC! abo" d.DerlbO, propori7. DDd &bo ooyo.aaiO 0' \YQftAD'll1onrID .. tolD." abaU o.t IPpl, &0 Glr UdO. '.&oreol 0' ODODmbruco orI.la. b,. laroasb or 8"or tbo "robaocr la Ht. 100 VoOI. a •• IIbEloIl ao& oDP17 10 OD, &aaou. OIlOOIlGeO.lo or otbor IlIo,aoli 10Ylo •• oouoood 0' booomtaa duo .. ho,UOD' to tIIo dato Dr OAI. coa.,acL _:;;-:-______ '-_'(CA&I " ~Mr.-Is,{}U (ao&J 00 It!! eo" ......."". """"" -. '" Goo .. "", S. .001ol1o '" . .. = booa ... _ Ib~. IbcrIb:d b c:U • 0D:aItd ~ wIItIb r=d ~~:~ , , 1:;14 II=aI tbaJ' £%pd IhusPtI GIl thai.. r.a t:d ~ tit cd d::::d. ·'cr:ib "", ... --~. CIVIIIf _ .., ..... cd _ clot!> '." IT. . , .. , .J .. . ~ ., , , .) At-._ Pill'tI fur RI"Mrd at RoqUlltt 01 ArnR REt:MDING ""IL TO • QuIt Clalln Dood RT.INOR J. CtlnTS'I'TAN, formorly F:linor .T. Gill hl'l' ",''' I,. n.n~I""'r."I, ..... , Om.! dollar .1nd oUwr vnlu.,blc conRidcrAtion :x elw C"Il-v" ... 4o'''rl'''''' , .. I "".'., .,~,," IWI thl c ...... tlt ". Kinq r() .1 'tall' •• 1 .... ,' .. llllIo\l.~. ,,,,1.,.1,, ... ""'1 Inh'UU thueln MIlch ,r ••• 1I' "''1 "",·.Ct,,r ....... lrl<l An lind i vidcd onG half :lntarest in and to Tract 1, nnd t:h«' north 1/2 of '!'ract 2, Panthor J.ako a~rden Trlll'l'H, ."lI'l'ordlng tn plat "ucorJccl in Voluma 9 of lllMtl, P'''Il! ZS in K1n9 County, waahinqton, 'i'OGR'l'HER WITU ,In t~ ... nOlQtlnt for ingress and cqrcsR ovcr tho ~i18t tS rUl!l of the weat 1/2 and tho Wt'8t 15 feet of thl' Ullut I/Z ot Tract 13 of Bnitl ('anther Lake Garden TractR. Datad ttl" .TAU ,. IMIIIla:Ta11, l CIIIomt7 of lUng 1(3. kING COUN'" NO EXCISE lA.l MAY 1 1978 EtJ'711;jU4 ..... l&d!C~L,9·(i~~~&<.,," " ................................... ~ ...... _"'Atl .., ttata ., pooCNll,. I,.,..red ltetC\'... Blinor J. Christian co _ '"'-to N eM t .... · ... M' ","l'tbo4 til ... vito _ted UtI vttbl. IH focIIOt.", , .. U\:anl .... .... dtflal • ...., .. her WI .. ond ~ dwnLD ~ __ • , .. GIYID ..... ., hand ~;;"kt.1. "'t cbt. .... 4 ~ .: " /'\ ) \~ . .... 1----------------- I I UNPLATTED ! I I ICIILI'. ,. ... .... ::10 ... .... _'-COrM Mil .• ".-..a, • _____ •• u. •• +1ICf_u .... -._ • ::..".~":.:':;:.:."'=' ... ~THER SCHCot. OISTRICT 40lI · .~".: ~L~~Gc~:~'A-;·"··'·""'··"~~!i!lIl-e'i""~iI:=::~"," CIIII'M'ICIIft~ ... ; """""""':~:.:_=~_::.::":~:o.::""";;_:i __ ;c:,,:,~::,;.~'''11';;''''':~\:\''~:-'~'''''''.) } 8103310'41 ,,,Oil ~" ' or'" CWiJilHC ...... OI_ ... ... '3 ...... -. ~- .AE<!I> " CASHSL. 3.00'. '. . _3 CO 22 OlJIT CLAIM DEED' THEORAHTOR Larry Mdntire tor end In consIcblodOl'l of coiWoy, I:ftd quit, clDimJ to a Property Settlement Agreament Dalene McIntire tha followinG cbIc:rfb:)d rad .. tato. ii_tod In dto County of •• 1_~.lricludintI .... " ..... _lldo: ICilng Lot 13. of PJ\IITIIBR LAItB GAlUJEN TlUlCTS. the B~t.ba~f '~DD the South 486 feet of .the Baat 139. 01:· f",et. less tbs County roa40. as recqrded in Volilllle 9. of 'plata. pag" 25. reedrds of King County. Washington. IIndhIdudI STAn Of WASHINGTON COUNTY Of ,Id! I~ 8y~--------~~~,;,.~.S~M'd;-----~----- 8y--------~~~·~I---------- STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTVOF Crt _ dzrV of • 18_. __ .... "IIb"Ip"",. NoWy PuioIIo 10 """ .. ilia Sa." ~"",dUIY ...,.'I!1ancd end ~ "'-~--"" .. . , .. "'" to "",'~ to bet (tto' . .... ""'_ ..... _ .... foroaolt\olM"""';" "'" 4da~wll del t em IIId InrCrumInt to ..... em Wtd"'~ _ oat end _ oIl1ld _ ......... "'" _ and;":' poIbI tIutf01n memlonod. end on ....... thz;I~ :-______ ~~~-OVV.orlnd io oQCUtO tho uid In$trumOIII and "'0\ th:) Rial afflud II tho eorporato-l6d of -",,_ ..... m .... Md _ "nood .... dW "'" ycor~" cbDIo ""'nan. : ' .... ',0 ; .~ ! ," .,: . .:- ·i .' L,~' I ' l.. I -' , ~ .. i I ~. ' , .' l' .... .,--.,.,.).. !-_ ..... <e'!!c--,. ,\w!.,~~.:....~I:-..:·.~~ ... ---..... .............. -... ~ ..... --,. ........ _ ... __ .... - Troot '1l' • • • I f '-.".", , ;;;:"_--"-,,,,:;' . .1 III D ~ ~ I RE~'S CER~ .. FlCA1E .'.r.H/.(.~.AQ,I' l LAND • ....... ~ aIfL.U_*" .,r ... .l.1.JL.ct:lN .. Sh..-t J q I DEPARlNENT Of ASSE$SM(NlS '-;:;;~., ..a;;B fi;ORMhimU IllS UO ~_:t;I\w.~ __ I...... "'\ I'OACO IItIWt a. rN .. - .=~~ ~ !IN=~cw . ..J =0 CXDn' • W ~ oaoro 6 00I:DmDIID or ~. 1DI'JIL~ u::a:tAaO.C::::I;c:::ftm.PQ I,,~ ..... =-btct"~~ t.t~.,. , II.:. . ,.y--., _ ....... _-. ..... 11& III. ..,1DMt-. QIOIl9CIIrn: I:II£:II.~. n~ __ IUo .' • ; < " Return To: WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK 22tO ENTERPRISE DRIVE FLORENCE, SC 29801 DOC OPS MIS FSCE 440 20060412000646.001 A8S~S Parcel or A"",:,u~t Number: 269820-0220-0~. A.. r~ .-A "" Vi n vJ Abbreviated Legal Descnption: &&I! PREL I... Pm \,Ot 'I qOnJIUII ,~ CStvJ"IL I vOl· I\~J l7CI,"7' .'. Irt'tudotot,l;r.;;k IIAd pI.t or .... ion. w.;;~ • .Jrangel Pull legal doscnption located on page 3 T~ PACIFIC NORT~EST TITLE .,Z"'W1l"AT'-------[Space Above This Line Par Recording DAtal --------- 3081725879-098 DEFINITIONS Words used in multiple sections of this document are defined below and other words are defined in Sections 3, II, 13, IS, 20 Bod 21. Certain rules regarding the usage of words used in this document are also provided in Section 16. (A) ·Seourity Instrument" means this document, which is da~e& 1iJWi!! -:t/ljil1!!. together with all Ridars to this document. 0\ (B) "Borrower" is JAMES H CHR I ST I AN AND, EL I NOR J CHR I ST IAN, HUSBAND AND WIFE "IflIO ACQUlIIlID HTLl! AS ELINOII. J. GILL. Borrower is the trustoruoder this Security Instrument. (C) "Leader" is WASH IOOTON MUTUAL BANK. FA WASHlNGTOlil,Blaate P. '0 M,elPRddlo Ma. UNlPOIlM INSTIl11MBNT Farm sou 1101 @/,-6(WA) : (0013) ·Pap] of 15 <:Qgf- VMP MORTGAOB PO o , ~i ) -_. __ . __ -... _1 N 30 60 1 "=60' I I I I I I~ I i I "I~ ill .~ S89'5'55-[ 154.64' -------------- '. I' , : ,,--______ .. H! _______ I 15" ; G~] NBB"50'J6"W 154.28' -: ilH'Ei] j ""'lr,oc~-II~~ri ~~~ )--"~,, ! ~:ll~ ~m: I "'i I 1".,~_, •. _.,J : , , I , , , I--' ~~~ 1\ if~i! ,,"'-""""---"''''-+-, ------ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~~~ t'!~~ ,- I 1. ... -- ! 1-·----,·_-, I , I , , , I , , , , , 1 ~ , r-, , '-L ___ . ___ ._. __ -._ ..•. ') (>J>l!. I L_I / /; ; 1--, , :-----, /.-lnl (-) [0 ~\;- ., ~ U -)1 ,. ~~-;;.:.-M3-07;;;:;;;;~.;-.-<l1.--. ;-;:;;"~;;;'-__;;~:;;:".-;-:s::-O;::-u=t-. ~=-:-·~-;-~:-~E--[~---:-~-N n-Gd------s-fr-'e-e-:-G-G-E-~-oRT-~-C-~o-TU-;-~-~-~-~T-=OO=IEJ=-ff © ~ Q Wi ~ [ '!5 MrUTARY ROAO SOUTH. PMB #644 DERALWAY.WA96023 11044·SE192NDST,RENTON,9 5 AU':" 20 200'7 253-652·1164 F ..... 2.!53.aS9-2065 KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON L' EGGFBRECHTSHoRTPLAT LOT POTENTIAL STIJOY REPORT OWNER: ERVIN EGGEBRECHT 1 1044 SE 192ND STREET RENTON, WA 98055 AGENT: SHELLY FORD TRUVEST, LLC P.O. Box 1754 RENTON, WA 98057 PHONE 253·226·5825 FAX 253·226-8008 PREPARED By: (i PYRAMDD i E NGHNEERHNG r, Il....Il....C COP~ 29015 MILITARY ROAD S., #544 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 P~~~~;~;~~.~6~~4 0 ~ r: 0 \' ~;O IE ~ ~ tf.d 'L:J 2008 K.c.D.D,E.,S. IR[EV~S~ONI JANUARY 1 8, 2008 BACKGROUND Eggebrecht (Truvest) Short Plat Lot Potential Study The Eggebrecht (Truvest) Short Plat is a 9-lot short plat proposed at 11044 SE 192nd Street (King County Application No. L07S0057). An existing dirt/gravel road serves the existing lot and other adjacent lots. This unimproved road is situated within an existing flag lot (Mcintire -Parcel 6623400134), an access easement (over Vardeman -Parcel 6623400129), and the subject property (Eggebrecht -Parcel 6623400132). The project proposes a private road to be contained within access easements. The Plat Screening Transmittal for the project dated November 21, 2007 raises the question of whether or not more than 16 parcels could use this access. KCRS 2.06 limits the number of residences to 16 for a private street. DISCUSSION Part 1 -Determination via Granted Road Variance In 2006, a road variance was requested by the applicant from King County Traffic Engineering Section (Road Variance L06V0062) to connect the proposed private street to SE 192nd Street. Wetlands to the north prevented a suitable access in that direction. On February 28, 2007 the variance was granted. The Road Variance Engineer, Mr. Craig Comfort, P.E. wrote in support of the variance, "The eXisting private gravel road will be improved to a KCRS minor access road classification. Approximately 15 lots are projected to be served by the road with future short platting of adjacent lots." A copy of the approved variance is provided in Attachment A at the end of this report. Part 2 -Determination via Short Term Perspective The Lot Potential Study map (next page) details the parcels in question. A discussion of each parcel is provided. Lot Owner: Christian, Lot size: 1.94 Acres, Zoning: R-8 Most of this parcel is wetland. Moreover, an existing public access to this parcel is provided at the northwest corner at the intersection of SE 189th Street and 111 th Place SE. An existing house does use the existing dirt road to the south. However no more homes will be allowed to access this road from this parcel. Page 1 of 7 .R_~~:t-__ L..I 1lE.'1Imf1ll 0743000020 07430000'0 07.3000030 0743000D50 07.3000040 p.;.~9'0300 l~t Potential Study f 2698200060 Christian 2698200220 2698200050 ,S659S1U70 1555950480 269820022' '~9SlU90 ./ I ~9S0840 ,S65QM650 /-:::'SS,lIl'll!f.CT ___ a 070000000' 0143000080 I _SIl.'15llf 1'1.- 6623400020 07.3000070 269S2OO223 2698200222 ,5659SOSOO 1565950970 fS65!)5()67D, 2698200224 R·18 Mcintire R·12 Eggebrech R-8 6623400'32 6823400136 1 '565950560 ,'6623400'37 '~9SOSSO; 6623400,20 Slaughter 6623400,33 ( '~9s1RCT Vardeman Herbel 6623400131 6623400129 J 1 + 6623400,53 6623400'60 --6623(00151 66234OD1S2' R·12 662340014'1 6623.00, .. R-8 OS22OS9002 0' ,roe Inlormahon tnCluaea on thiS map nOI eeen eomPlI80 Dy I\mg I"OUnty sian nom 8 vanelY OJ sources ana IS subject w cnsnge wllnout nallce. I\,ng County makes ~ rep,resetltations or warranties, 8Xp;eSS oilmpl!ed, 88 to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, ~ rig~1 to the.use of SlJCh Informa~n. This document IS not Intended fOl use as a survey product. King County shall not be hable lor any g8n8l'81, .peerll, Indirect, Incidental, or consequential damage, Including, bl.Il not limited 10, lost revenuas or lost profits I1IsuWng from the use or misuse of the Informallon contained on Ihls mllp. Arty sale of this map or information on this map II prohibited eJICcepl by written permlS8ion of KIng County. Dete: 111612008 SOI.Irce: KIng County iMAp· Property Information (hllp:/lwww.metrokc.govIGISIiMAP) 1$65950010 , 0S22OS9260 7300000390 1;5111 01 King County Lot Owner: Mcintire. Lot size: 0.87 Acres. Zoning: R-8 This site currently has a large, pleasant home with a swimming pool, both of which consume much of the parcel area. Slopes take up the remainder of the lot. It is not a property considered "ripe" for redevelopment. For this "Short Term" scenario, it is assumed that this parcel will not subdivide further. Lot Owner: Slaughter. Lot size: 0.48 acres. Zoning: R-8 An existing home is located on this parcel and is adjacent to the proposed private street. It is unlikely this home would be razed in the short term. Lot Owner: Herbel. Lot size: 0.50 acres. Zoning: R-8 This site has no structures on the site and is most likely the only lot that would be developed in the short term. It is highly probable that no direct access to SE 192 nd Street would be allowed forcing access to the proposed private road_ Should the parcel be subdivided, dedication of the frontage along the former private street would be required. This dedication would reduce the developable size of the lot to 0.41 acres and at the allowed density of R-8 only three lots could be created. This development is highly dependent on the owners of the Mcintire parcel since they have expressed no interest in dedicating or selling the flag portion of their lot for public use. Lot Owner: Vardeman. Lot size: 0.39 acres. Zoning: R-8 The Vardeman parcel is situated adjacent to SE 192 nd Street and the proposed private street. One large, existing home is on the lot. Should this site be redeveloped frontage improvements will be required on two sides. Along SE 192nd Street, 12-feet of property would have to be dedicated to the public right of way. This amounts to 154'x12'=1,848 sf. Along the proposed road, a minimum of 15-feet would need to be dedicated, or 130'x15'=1, 950 sf. The total dedicated area would be 0.09 acres, leaving 0.3 acres to be developed. At the zoning density of R-8, only two lots could be developed in the remaining area. The cost of removing the existing home to develop two new, smaller homes with full frontage improvements would be prohibitive. Therefore it is highly unlikely that any new residences would be developed at this lot. Part 3 -Determination via Long Term Perspective This assessment is broken down into two parts: the north portion and the south portion. Lot Owner: Mcintire. Lot size: 0.87 Acres. Zoning: R-8 This site currently has a large, pleasant home with a swimming pool, both of which consume much of the parcel area. The property ~ize includes the 15- foot wide access "flag" to SE 192 nd Street. This flag has an area of'470'x15'= 0.16 acres and grants access rights to other lots. If this flag is taken out, the developable area is 0.71 acres. In addition, the wetland buffer to the Page 3 of 7 northwest infringes on the parcel further reducing the development potential. likely only three new lots could be developed for a total of four. Lot Owner: Slaughter, Lot size: O.4B acres, Zoning: R-B An existing home is located on this parcel and is adjacent to the proposed private street. Should the parcel be redeveloped, dedication of the frontage along the former private street in the amount of 30-feet would be required. This dedication would reduce the developable size of the lot to 0.3B acres and at the allowed R-B density only three lots could be created. Lot Owner: Herbel, Lot size: 0.50 acres. Zoning: R-B This site has no structures on the site. With the zoning density allowed up to four lots could be developed. No direct access to SE 192nd Street would be allowed. However, this parcel was very recently subdivided via short plat. King County Code restricts redevelopment of new parcels for a period of 5- years. Should the parcel be redeveloped, dedication of the frontage along the former private street in the amount of 30-feet would be required. This dedication would reduce the developable size of the lot to 0.41 acres and at the allowed density of R-B only three lots could be created. Lot Owner: Vardeman, Lot size: 0.39 acres, Zoning: R-B The Vardeman parcel is situated adjacent to SE 192 nd Street and the proposed private street. One large, existing home is on the lot. Should this site be redeveloped frontage improvements will be required on two sides. Along SE 192nd Street, 12-feet of property would have to be dedicated to the public right of way. This amounts to 154'x12'=1,B4B sf. Along the proposed road, a minimum of 15-feet would need to be dedicated, or 130'x15'=1,950 sf. The total dedicated area would be 0.09 acres, leaving 0.3 acres to be developed. At the zoning density of R-B, only two lots could be developed in the remaining area. The cost of removing the existing home to develop two new, smaller homes with full frontage improvements would be prohibitive. Therefore it is highly unlikely that any new residences would be developed at this lot. CONCLUSIONS Road Variance The road variance granted indicates by the County's own study that no more than 15 lots will use the new road. No justification or background is provided regarding how this decision was made, but it suggests some thought was provided. Based on Part 1 -Variance of the discussion above, less than 16 residences will be served by the proposed road which would allow the use of a private road. Page 4 of 7 Short Term In a realistic scenario, the Vardeman, Christian, Mcintire, and Slaughter parcels will not subdivide further because of the lot conditions and the existing residences that exist. Only Eggebrecht and the Herbel parcels are the most obvious parcels to subdivide. Eggebrecht is proposing 1 existing plus 8 new homes. Herbel could develop up to one plus 2 new lots. The total number of homes using the road in this case is 16. This is under the threshold for requiring a public road. . Long Term The long term development scenario is very speculative, especially with respect to the Mcintire site. However, based on a "worst-case," fully- developed area, a summary of the number of residences which could use the north half of this road are as follows: Christian Lot: Residences: 1 Mcintire Lot: Residences: 4 Eggebrecht Lot: Residences: 8 Subtotal 13 This suggests that in the "fully developed condition," the north half of the proposed road can be used as a private road since the number of lots is less than 17. At the south half of the road, the number of lots is also highly speculative, but because the number of lots could exceed the threshold of 16 lots, it is treated differently. Based on a fully developed area, a summary of the number of residences which could use the south half of this road are as follows: North half: Residences: 13 Slaughter Lot: Residences: 3 Herbel Lot: Residences: 3 Vardeman Lot: Residences: 1 Eggebrecht Lot: Residences: 1 TOTAL 21 For the short term, the number of residences that will be served by the proposed private road does not exceed the threshold. Therefore a private street may be used. Although the area and zoning combine to suggest a maximum of 21 lots could be created, it is very speculative and in some cases, very unlikely. It should not be incumbent on the developer to anticipate redevelopment of existing developed parcels and to provide any more of a road than is reasonable for the subject development. Moreover, because Mcintire owns the flag access in front of all the parcels in question and has vehemently indicated that no dedication for public use will be offered, it will be very difficult for any developer to secure the necessary right of way. For these reasons, a private road is still proposed. Page 5 of 7 The proposed private road will include a half-street improvement section along the southerly 260-feet in conformance with the Plat Screening Transmittal. In the event either the Mcintire, Slaughter or Herbel parcels are subdivided to their full potential, the number of residences will exceed the limit of 16 and appropriate right of way will need to be dedicated at that time for the southerly portion of the road. RECOMMENDATIONS For the purposes of this analysis, a reasonable approach to the road ownership is offered. For the conditions that exist now, in all likelihood, no more than 16 lots will utilize the road. Thus a private road is allowed. It is highly unlikely that Yardman, Christian and Mcintire will subdivide. It is also unrealistic to believe Slaughter will subdivide since a home exists there now. The only "wildcard" is Herbel. Should this parcel subdivide, the two extra lots would push the number of lots accessing this road over the threshold requiring the road to be public. Since the status of the road depends on that parcel developing, and because Mcintire has vehemently expressed no dedication to the public will be allowed on her flag portion of the parcel, the issue of making the road a public road is questionable at this time. It is therefore reasonable to allow the road to be private until such time that additional subdivisions occur. At that time another analysis based on a better understanding of the subdivision conditions can be used. It is recommended that for the short term the new road be a private road, though constructed to public standards. Page 6 of 7 Road Servlc:es Division Department of Transportation KSC-TR-0222 201 South Jackson Street S ... ttle. WA 98104-3856 February 28, 2007 TruvestLLC P.O. Box 1754 Renton, W A 98057 RE: Road Variance L06Y0062 -Truyest Short Plat Dear Applicant: Thank you for your application for a variance from the King County Road Standards (KCRS). You requested a variance from Section 2.10 of the KCRS concerning the intersection spacing for the access onto SE 192nd Street The location at SE 192nd Street is a principal arterial for which the KCRS requires a minimum of 1,000 feet of intersection spacing. We reviewed your proposal and agree that the existing private road extending northward at the 111 block of SB 192nd Street is the most viable access to your site. Wetlands within sensitive areas and within County road easement obstruct potential road connections to the north of the site. The intersection spacing to the north from the private road is 375 feet to 113th Way SB, and to the south is 330 feet to IIOth Place SB. I approve the reduced intersection spacing for the proposed road improvement of the existing private road This decision applies only to KCRS identified in the variance request. All other design requirements in the KCRS and other regulations, such as surface water management and zoning, must still be satisfied for a land use permit application. The applicant retains the right~ and privileges afforded by King County Code and adopted Public Rules pertaining to road variance processing (KCC 14.42, PUT 10-2). This variance decision is valid for one year from date ofletter unless an associated land use permit is pending or submitted within the one year period. In these cases, the variance decision is valid for the duration of the permit processing. TruvestLLC February 28, 2007 Page 2 A copy of staff's analysis, findings, and conclusions is enclosed. If you have any questions, please call Craig COmfort, Road Variance Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, at 206-263-6109. Paulette Nonnan, P.E. County Road Engineer PN:CC:kc cc: James Sanders, P.E., Development Engineer, Land Use Services Division (LUSD), Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) Pete Dye P.E., Senior Engineer, LUSD, DDES Linda Dougherty, Division Director, Road Services Division (RSD), Department of Transportation (DOT) Matthew Nolan, P.E., COunty Traffic Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT Fatin Kara, P.E., Supervising Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT Kris Langley, Senior Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT Craig Comfort, P.E., Road Variance Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT --.. __ ._._-._.-_._-.. _------ KlngCounty Road Services Division 'Departmont ofTransportaation TraIIic Engineerin( Section MS J(SC.TJl.0222 201 South Jaclcson Stroet Seattle. WA 98104 February 28, 2007 TO: Variance File FM: Craig Comfort, P.E., Road Variance Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section RE: Road Variance LQ6y0062 -TroVes! Short Plat AppliCant's Presentation: 1. The proposed Truvest Short Plat is for Dine lots on an existing private street extending north off the King County principal arterial ofSE 192nd Avenue. The private gravel road is 375 feet west of I 13th Way SE and serves five homes. A private road to the west, I 10th Place SE is 330 feet from the proposed short plat access road (the existing gravel road). The King County Road Standanls (KCRS) requires 1,000 feet of intersection spacing along a principal arterial. 2. There is no viable alternative access to the short plat. The existing gravel road access is in private road easements. A thirty-foot public road easement extends from Illth Place SE to the northwest corner of the proposed shnrt plat. However, several wetlands within the easement area block any road connection. To the west of the public easement is a tract owned by King County as access to a pond. The tract also is encumbered with private access easements and the easement holders will not permit a road within the tract. 3. The existing private gravel road will be improved to a KCRS minor access road classification. Approximately 15 lots are projected to be served by the road with future short platting of adjacent lots. Staff's Findings and Conclusions: 1. Concurrence with the applicant's presentation. The wetlands to the north and the limited road easement width of30 feet all but preclude a road connection. 2. The entering sight distance at the access point to SE 192nd Street exceeds KCRS minimums. I , i ! 1 " l ! , l i I ... \.lJ ~ ~ II '" ~ ~ c Q oct: ~ & .sa i~ i ~i ~J r--... Ii l~ )) \ d)·l I , . ; .!?=====~ ;!~. : 4.10 Ie T I 101110 II .. ... CIOfII-04CO • ... • • Ii· I i. 411041 sr 111M tQ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov March 21,2008 Shelly Ford Truvest, LLC P.O. Box 1754 Renton, WA 98057 RE: Notice of Request for Additional Information or Studies Application No. L07S0057-Truvest Short Plat Dear Ms. Ford: The purpose of this letter is to notify you pursuant to King County Code Title 20 that the Land Use Services Division is requesting additional information and/or studies to _ complete the review of your project. The information is described on the enclosed plat screening transmittal. When submittil']g the requested information, include a copy of the plat screening transmittal and retain a copy for your records. Provide a cover letter, which lists how each item, was addressed. Any clarification or explanation of the submittal can also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: ---.-----.--.---------~--------- King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATTN.: Shannon Dorr, Project Manager II, Current Planning Section 900 Oaksdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 ---If-the-submittat-is-hand-delivered;submit-aHtm-address-above. Your application is on "hold" from the date of this notice, until the date you are advised that the additional information satisfies this request or 14 days after the date the information has been provided. You will be notified if the Division determines that the information is insufficient. Please note that the supplemental information required after vesting of a complete application shall not affect the validity of such application. The deadline for the submittal of the necessary information is June 20, 2008. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist, which may justifY an extension of this date, you may submit such request, in writing, for consideration by this Department. Failure to meet the deadline shall be cause for the Department to cancel or deny the application. If possible, please submit all of the information in one package. If you have any questions, regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-6673. annon Dorr Program/Project Manager ---------CurrenfPlanning Section -------------------------- CC: Mark Follmer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Nick Gillen, Critical Areas Section, LUSD Trishah Bull, Current Planning Sections, LUSD File L07S0057 -Truvest SP March 20. 2008 Screening cover letter (2) Page 2 of 2 .tQ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov '9 ~:. '. . ?",j 'f :;'. ,"'!,~ ::'~w. :~:·~,'r:',:"·'.";·: t.}'":~,i>'. ''',''t:~:: \:. ,',: .. ''''': ," " " ':' .. "-'. ~"I 'F,llat'Screenin!:J!'.'Franshiitta\iy" . .;;' "''';.; .•. ,:' .... • ,: >, • ; /' ' "" .: '; !C'." ~", _ _' " ~" .. ...... PreJif11ih.~f:y,~liilt"Apl)l.icatio~::::;Truve~f;;.sI1())t;~Jat .... ::.,' ~~~D:F,ile:Noi'!l0:r~09~:r:':'t:; ,!;~,:::;.4, i';;;~{'~."·'" •... <:JDate9~I~fo~ma,ttqh:,~~qu.~S.t,:;.l\IIa~~,11 ~J,'~Q9.~.,,·.; " \ ;' ,Deadline'for Submittal of Information:' June ,20, 2008', • ,,~'.:~ .•••• ',: .... ,;.' ",' ',',':.,".: 1"'( •. ,.',1>",1,: L,' .'~-I!:~;;I'.HI~( ~ ~i.:-',~.;:~:,<' ""',..'~" . ' "de; • "'''vi,-weE-r··'m" O·'f' Please provide ten (5) copies of the following, unless otherwise noted, '" 1, A 30-froot paved radius is required for the half street at the northeast corner of the intersection of the access road and SE 192 no Street (Section 1,05 B), A letter of intent is required (with the next submittal) from the neighbor indicating an interest in granting an easement for the pavement located on their property prior to final recording, Alternatively, you may submit an approved variance for a smaller radius and a revised site plan that does not include the encroachment 2, The potential lot count (along the off-site access road) exceeds 16 (Section 2,06 B,7), Although, not required (in this case), dedication of right-of-way (ROW) is desired for the off-site road (in lieu of an easement), You may include (with the next submittal) a letter of intent from the neighbor (Vardeman property) indicating his or her interest in dedicating ROW prior to final recording, As a result of the review of the information, additional information (studies, revisions, etc.) may be requested at a later date, Further evaluation of these issues may result in the reconfiguration and lor loss of lots, Truvest SP -L07S0057 November 21, 2007 Screening· Letter (2) Page 1 of 1 LETTER OF INTENT TO PROVIDE EASEMENT Jerry Vardeman and Pat Vardeman (VanlemaDs), husband and wife, and legal owners of the property known as 11038 SE 192nd Street, Renton, WA 98057 (Assessor Parael No. 6623400129), agree to provide an easement for sidewalk and curb at the . southeast corner of said parcel in order to satisfY the street improvement requirements of the Trovest Short Plat. The final easement document shall be subject to approval by the V anlemaDs TlUVest, LLC, the developer of the Truvest Plat, agrees to compensate V anlemans, as set forth in a separate letter dated December 20, 2007, for the granting of the easement. Agreed this 20th day of December, 2007. - Pat Vardeman S estLLC ~\. -i. 'J.Lt,c.S. \RlEV~S~ONI · .. PYRAMID ENGINEERING LLC April 29, 2008 REU ff Shannon Dorr, Program/Project Manager \\f IS ION Land Use Services Division King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oaksdale Avenue SW fD) ~ f0:, Renton, WA 98057-5212 Iftl U;; ~ ~ D '¥I ~ U RE: Truvest Short Plat -Application No. L07S0057 APR 2 9 ZOOB /YJ Plat Screening Trimsmittal Request for Additional Information dated 3/21108 KC. D.D.E.S. Dear Ms. Dorr: In response to the County's letter of March 21, 2008, we hereby transmit the following information: o Revised Preliminary Plat Map set (5 copies) A discussion of each of the identified issues follows below. 30-foot Paved Radius Item 1 of the above referenced letter requests a 30-foot paved radius to be provided at the northeast comer of the intersection of the proposed private street and SE 1 92 nd Street. . Initial layouts suggested that this paved radius would encroach upon the adjacent property and the request was for a letter from the property owner indicating an interest in granting an easement for the pavement encroachment. We were able to shift the intersection to the west just enough to be able to provide the desired paved radius without encroaching on the adjacent property, therefore we do not need the letter of intent for the easement. Because the revision meets the intent of providing the paved radius and we were able to accommodate the request within the King County Road Standards, we do not need a variance. We have adjusted the Preliminary Plat Maps to reflect the change. Potential Lot Count Item 2 of the Request for Additional Information does not require any new information to be provided. It states a dedication is desired, but not required and the applicant may include a letter of intent from the adjacent property owner for dedication. Because a letter of intent to provide an easement has already been provided, the applicant declines to provide this new information at this time. 2008-04-29 Xmttl to SOorr re Addtl Info -Part 2 Page I of2 29015 Mili1ary Ad S., PMB #544, Federal Way, WA 98003 • (253) 852·1164 • Fax (253) 859·2065 '''' -. We hope this satisfies all the issues described in the Plat Screening Transmittal. Please contact us if you have any questions or need additional infonnation. Thank you. Sincerely, PYRAMID ENGINEERING, LLC pe~,~ Project Civil Engineer Attachments as noted above. CC: Shelly Ford and Gary Watts, Truvest, LLC, P.O. Box 1754, Renton, WA 98057 2008.;)4-29 Xmttl to SOorr re Addtllnfo -Pan 2 Page 2 of2 ~ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc,goY November 21, 2007 Shelly Ford Truvest, LLC P.O. Box 1754 Renton, WA 98057 RE: Notice of Request for Additional Information or Studies Application No. L07S0057-Truvest Short Plat Dear Ms. Ford: The purpose of this letter is to notify you pursuant to King County Code Title 20 that the Land Use Services Division is requesting additional information and/or studies to complete the review of your project. The information is described on the enclosed plat screening transmittal. When submitting the requested information, include a copy of the plat screening transmittal and retain a copy for your records. Provide a cover letter, which lists how each item, was addressed. Any clarification or explanation of the submittal can also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATTN.: Kim Claussen, Project Manager III, Current Planning Section 900 Oaksdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 If the submittal is hand delivered, submit at the address above. Your application is on "hold" from the date of this notice, until the date you are advised that the additional information satisfies this request or 14 days after the date the information has been provided. You will be notified if the Division determines that the information is insufficient. Please note that the supplemental information required after vesting of a complete application shall not affect the validity of such application. The deadline for the submittal of the necessary information is January 22, 2008. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist, which may justify an extension of this date, you may submit such request, in writing, for consideration by this Department. Failure to meet the deadline shall be cause for the Department to cancel or deny the application. If possible, please submit all of the, information in one package. If you have any questions, regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-6673. --:\ljlmfl11on Dorr Program/Project Manager Current Planning Section CC: Mark Follmer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Nick Gillen, Critical Areas Section, LUSD Trishah Bull, Current Planning Sections, LUSD 'File L07S0057 -Truves! SP November 21, 2007 Screening cover. letter (1) Page 2 012 ·~ I',.'. """ .. , -.... ~ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Plat Screening Transmittal Preliminary Plat Application -Truvest Short Plat LUSD File No. L07S0057 Date of .Information Request: November 21, 2007 Deadline for Submittal of Information: January 22, 2008 Please provide ten (10) copies of the following, unless otherwise noted. Recreation Space: Contact Shannon Dorr at (206) 296-6673 if you have any questions regarding recreation space requirements. Submit a conceptual recreation plan which indicates the type of improvements (i.e. sport court, play structure, benches, landscaping, etc.) proposed within the recreation tract. See KCC 21A.14.1BO E2 for equipment requirements. Please note, any areas shown as landscape tracts and/or "opens pace" shall not be counted/credited towards the recreation requirement of 390 square feet per lot. Drainage: Please submit 3 copies of the following required studies and/or site plan revisions. Contact Mark Follmer at (206) 296-7039 if you have questions regarding drainage issues. Delineation of the 1 ~O-year floodplain is required for the wetland immediately to the north of the site (Sections 1.3.2, and 4.4.2). Please include a revised site plan (by a professional engineer) with the next submittal. Roads: Please submit 3 copies of the following required studies and/or site plan revisions. Contact Mark Follmer at (206) 296-7039 if you have questions regarding access. The typical road section does not show sidewalks on both sides of the road. Concrete sidewalks are required on sub-access streets exceeding 150 feet in length, (both sides, Section 3.02.4). Additionally, at the intersection with SE 192 St., the right-of-way line and curb return radii are not . shown (2.1 0.A.3). A revised plan is required with the next submittal. Beginning at the southwesterly corner of Parcel 6623400136, and preceding northerly, a full-width right-of-way/tract of 40 feet must be provided. The improvements north of Parcel 6623400136 shall include a 24-foot wide roadway, with concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks (both sides) and a full turnaround complying with KCRS 2.0B. The right-of-way width may be reduced to 1-foot behind the sidewalk if you propose vertical curb instead of rolled curb/gutter, and permanent easements are provided for utilities. A revised plan is required with the next submittal. South of Parcel 6623400136, the road alignment may shift easterly, connected to the alignment north of that point using an appropriate low-speed curve (100-foot radii) reversing curve across the frontage of proposed Lot 1: the existing residence. The minimum improvements from Parcel 6623400136, south to SE 192 nd Street, shall comply with the half street requirements of KCRS 2.07. This shall include a minimum 20-foot wide paved roadway, concrete curb, gutter and a five (5)-foot wide sidewalk along the west side of the Tract "C" access road. Submit a conceptual roadway design showing these features, or an approved variance. Truvest SP -L07S0057 November 21, 2007 Screening Letter (1) Page 1 of 3 o Note: A half street may be considered where it is likely that the opposite side of the street is developable (Fig. 2-009). A full curb-and-sidewalk section would be required behind parcels served off SE 190th Place (6623400135 and 6623400136) because it is not likely that they would be subdivided further. The conceptual plan shows an easement for the access road. KCRS 2.06 limits the number of residences to 16 for a private street. Include a revised conceptual plan with the next submittal demonstrating a lot count less than 17. Alternatively, you may include an approved road variance with a lot count exceeding the threshold. Or, you may provide a letters of intent from the neighbors indicating an interest in dedicating adequate right-of-way. Additionally, letters of intent are required from the property owners at the northeast and northwest quadrants of the intersection of Tract "C"/SE 192nd Street to allow construction of the required curb returns: including concrete curb and gutter and an ADA compliant ramp designed in accordance with Figures 3-011 or 3-012 of the 2007 KCRS -or, approved revisions by the County Road Engineer. Alternatively, an approved road variance may be submitted in lieu of this requirement. Our pictures of the site access road entrance from SE 192 nd St. show a power pole that is not shown on the topo map. Such an object must be located a minimum of 5.5 feet back from the face of the curb or 10 feet from the edge of the traveled way (5.10). Address this pole on the revised roadway design and show on the topo map. Walkways: Please contact Mark Follmer at (206) 296-7039 or Shannon Dorr at (206) 296-6673 if you have any questions regarding school walkways. Provide a school walkway inventory from the proposed plat entrance off of SE 192nd Street, to the schools that will serve the future residents of this proposed short plat. This subdivision is located within the boundaries of the Renton School District, and appears to be served by the Benson Hill Elementary School (located at 116th Avenue SE/SE .184th Street), Nelsen Middle School (located near Old Benson Road/South 27th Street inside the City of Renton), and Lindbergh High School. The walkway inventory for students attending Nelsen Middle and Lindbergh High schools shall extend from the plat entrance to the nearest school bus stop. This inventory shall include an aerial photograph of the area covered by the walking routes with the routes highlighted/annotated, ground level photographs (taken at regular intervals along the walkway routes) of the roadway shoulder conditions, and a written narrative of the shoulder conditions: surfacing material (e.g. concrete sidewalk, asphalt shoulder, gravel shoulder, etc.) and the width of the surface as applicable, the proximity (field measured) of any open stormwater conveyance syste'1ls (roadside' ditches) and other potential hazards (overhead utility poles) that might force pedestrians to move close to vehicular traffic. Based upon the results of this inventory, improvements to these walkways may be required as a condition of preliminary approval under the authority of RCW 58.17.110. Wetlands: Contact Nick Gillen at (206) 296-7141 if you have questions regarding wetland issues. Based on the review of the submitted information and field review, we concur with the wetland delineation. However, we disagree with the wetland rating. The report indicates a Category III wetland with a 75 foot buffer. Per our rating of the wetland, we believe it is a Category II wetland that would require a 100 foot buffer. Based on current code the required buffer maybe reduced by 25 Truvest SP -107S0057 November 21, 2007 Screening Letter (1) Page 2 of3 ·feet: ttlus having a 75 foot buffer as shown on the site plan. Therefore no changes or additional infeJrmation is required at this time. Survey: Contact Ray Florent at (206) 296 c6790 if you have any questions regarding the survey. The proposed use of the west 15 feet of the east half of tract 13 easement that is part of the legal description, should have documentation as to how and when it was established. The proposed· roadway is most likely a use but the proposed roadway would have to be private or a letter of intent to dedicate the area from the owner would be needed to require a public road. The proposed BLA for the fence encroachment should be completed prior to preliminary approval of the short plat. Revised Preliminary Plat: Provide 10 copies of a revised preliminary plat, as necessary, as a result of above-referenced requests for additional information. As a result ofthe review of the information, additional information (studies, revisions, etc.) may be requested at a later date. Furlher evaluation of these issues may result in the reconfiguralion and/or loss of lois. Truvest SP -L07S0057 November 21 , 2007 Screening Letter (1) Page 3 of 3 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 October 10, 2007 TO: Trishah Bull, ProjectlPlanner Manager III, Current Planning Section FM: Pat Simmons, Engineer II, Engineering Review Section Via: Ray Florent, Engineer III,Engineering Review Section Planner: Shannon Dorr RE: Proposed Short Plat of TEggebrecht LUSD File No, L07S0057 Comments ofthe above project I, The location of the Vertical datum point needs to be stated or plotted per KCC 19A.08.130(A) or stated that no exists within Y, mile. 2. The proposed use of the west 15 feet of the east half of tract 13 easement that is part of the legal description should have documentation as to how and when it was established. The proposed roadway is most likely a use but the proposed roadway would have to be private or a letter of intent to dedicate the area from the owner would be needed to require a public road. 3. This is a legal lot per the tax records. 4. The proposed BLA for the fence encroachment should be completed prior to the preliminary approval of the short plat. 5. The area of density calculation is co,rrect. ,; -. ® King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 L07S0057 Truvest Short Plat DOES Project Number ,. '\ , , 1,---",Sh..,;;,-,-",e,,"I.IJ'-1A':'\-:~s,-='l------' hereby affirm that I have posted the following: , (priciJame) X Notice of Permit Application o Other _____________ _ / on the y'\:!l day of Ocrot&<' ,2007, in accordance with the Department of Development and Environmental Services' requirements. I further affirm that the notice will remain in place and visible during the full required notice period. Notice was provided at the following location(s): 1) 11044 5 t= 19Z MP ~t. 2) ____________________________________________ __ 3) ________________________________________ __ I hereby affirm that the above is a true and correct statement. MAIN FILE COpy This affidavit must be completed and returned to the Land Use Services Division within 7 days of posting. Improper posting or failure to return the affidavit within 7 days shall be cause for the final decision regarding your permit to be postponed. @ King County Department of Developipent and Environmental Services OAK-OE-01DO 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057 . CPLN/JMOE .. ..",,'. SEATTLE WA 981, ',< ~ . ..",. 09, .oCT 2007 Pf.18 L '-"'- "1' '0 KING COUNTy .c DEPT, OF DEVELOPMENT ANEl.:;) ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES f;\ 900 Oakesdale Avenue SOuthwest .w Renton. Washington 98057-5212 • ~D -\iU Q 5$ ~ ::t ;c = --' ~, W o ,g '-':5 e @ ,. «'llJe Seattle <!times ~ REPRESENTING THE Stattle'ost-3JnteUigenctr Re Advertiser Account #78871004 Ad TEXT:KING COUNTY DEPT. OF OEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DOES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98057·5212 NOTICE OF LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUEST: SHORT Plat File: L07S0057 Applicant: Truvest, LLCIShelly Ford Location: 11044 SE 192nd St., Renton Proposal: Subdivide 1.8 acres zoned R·e, Into 9 lots Project Planner: Shannon Dorr, 206·296-6673 COMMENT PROCEDURES: DOES will issue a decision on this application following a 21· day comment period ending on November 6, 2007. Written com ments and addltlonallntorma tlon can be obtained by contact Ing the planner at the phone number listed above. Published this 10th day 01 October, 2007 Ad # 752970600 (!'IJe Seattle (!times ~ REPRESENTING THE Seattle'ost-.3JnteUigencer PO Box 70, Seattle, WA 98111 K C IDEV & ENVIRON ATTN CAROL WOOD 900 OAKESDALE AVE SW RENTON, WA 98055 Re: Advertiser Account #78871004 Ad #: 752970600 3802883/3 STATE OF WASHINGTON Counties of King and Snohomish Affidavit of Publication The undersigned, on oath states that helshe is an authorized representative of The Seattle Times Company, publisher of The Seattle Times and representing the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, separate newspapers of general circulation published daily in King and Snohomish Counties, State of Washington. The Seattle Times and the Seattle Post-Intelligencer have been approved as legal newspapers by orders of the Superior Court of King and Snohomish Counties. The notice, in the exact form annexed, was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper or papers and distributed to its subscribers during all of the said period. Newspaper Publlcatlon Date The Seattle Times 10/10/07 STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING} AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a bi·weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a bi·weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on October 10, 2007. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $142.88. ~LIlA »?~ tlrid""M. Mills ,11 111 111 Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter ,,\' 'CAN T t!: 11III Subscribed and sworn to me this 12'" day of October, 200\:-" Q •••• SiON·· •• ~q,'~ ~ <Q ••. ",s 4.o".'v, C2n 'ft ,.'," ",., . -.~ .~-fl2 D ~~ gL) -t" NOTARY "'\ ~ B Cantelon = Ul : PUBUC : Z : Nolary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in ~a;. Washington / f? 2 , r. ". o~ ,~ .. r,.. .... P. O. Number: , .<>. ··.'!/01fZo ••• ·'.::..v " '''','' 0 ......... >.\" ,,-" '" f': WASP ", 111111,,",,\' KING COUNTYDEPl'. OF DEVEWPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DDES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98057-5212 NOTICE OF PERMIT APPUCATION REQUEST-SHORT Plat File: L07S0057 Applicant: Truves~ LLClShelly Ford Location: 11044 SE 192nd St.,lUlnton Proposal: Subdivide 1.8 acres zoned R-B, into 9 lots Project Planner: Shannon Dorr, 206-296-5673 COMMENT PROCEDURES: DDES will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day comment period ending on November 6, 2007. Written comments and additional information can be obtained by contacting the planner at the phone number listed above. Published in the IUlnton IUlporters, October 10, 2007.1#864200. , WAU<WAY iNVENTORY sruDY REPORT OWNER: ERVIN EGGEBRECHT 1 1 044 SE 1 92ND STREET RENTON, WA 98055 AGENT: SHELLY FORD TRUVEST, LLC P.O. Box 1754 RENTON, WA 98057 PHONE 253-226-5825 FAX 253-226-8008 PREPARED By: a pVRAMDD ";. E NGUNEERUNG '. ILILC 29015 MILITARY ROAD S .. #544 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 PHONE 253-852-1 1 64 FAX 253-859-2065 .. 'P' 10) [E CC [~J ~ [E [Q) lJil FEB 2 5 Z008 K.C. D.D.E.S. IR[EV~S!ONI EXPIRES 2-2-09 JANUARY 1 8, 2008 JEggebrecht Short Plat Walkway Inventory Study Background In response to the Eggebrecht Short Plat review (Application No. L07S0057), King County staff issued a Plat Screening Transmittal that outlined a variety of issues which required additional information prior to a complete review. One of those items was an inventory of the walkways which school children would utilize. The identified schools of interest were: . Lindberg High School, Nelson Middle School, and Benson Hill Elementary School. In order to define the specific limits of the study, Pyramid Engineering contacted the Renton School District on Monday, January 7,2008. A staff member of the Transportation Department at the District office indicated that for the specific project, the following pedestrian routes should be evaluated: o Site to Lindberg High School bus stop, o Site to Nelson Middle School bus stop, and o Site to Benson Hill Elementary School. These locations are provided in Figure I. On Wednesday, January 9, Pyramid Engineering inventoried the local pedestrian routes by walking the routes taking photographs at regular intervals taking note of special circumstances and measuring features which could impede or restrict pedestrian travel along the corridors. Photo numbers and directions of photo are indicated on the figure. Findings At aU locations, the walkways provided a paved surface for the entire routes. For the most part, the walkways were typical cement concrete sidewalks 5-feet to 7-feet wide adjacent to a vertical concrete curb. This condition was typically found along recently developed projects, which included the full length of 108 th Avenue SE. Along SE 192nd Street and I 16th Avenue SE, the sidewalks were less continuous. However, where the typical sidewalks were missing, an asphalt paved shoulder was available which was 8-feet to 9-feet wide from edge of paving to the fog line ofthe roadway. A detailed photo description of each of the pedestrian routes is provided. No permanent impediments within the walkways were identified. Page 1 of 14 EGGEBRECHT SHORT PLAT WALKWAY INVENTORY STUDY ri PYRAMID ENGINEERING LLC FIGURE 1 LOCAL AERIAL MAP Site to Lindberg High School Bus Stop at Intersection of SE 190th Street and lOS th Avenue SE LU\JlUUlg South Along East Side of 10Sth Avenue SE Page 3 of 14 ----------------------------, 3. Looking South along IOS th Avenue SE ~;,.~~clra,rltofIntersection ofSE 192 nd Street and 10Sth Avenue SE ~ ,--j Page 4 of 14 5. '""'}HI< SE 192nd Street from Intersection at 1 OSIh Avenue SE ~---".." Page 5 of 14 ru')lJI;! North Side of SE 192nd Street Toward Site Intersection Page 6 of 14 ..... ",..",North Side ofSE 192nd Street Toward Site Intersection Page 7 of 14 Site to Nelson Middle School Bus Stop Page 8 of 14 Site to Benson HjI! Elementary School Pmiect intersection at SE 192nd Street Looking East I!. Intersection ofll2th Avenue SE and SE 192 nd Street Looking East Page 9 of 14 12. SE 192nd Street Looking East Page 10 of 14 15 . Intersection of 114th Avenue SE and SE 192 00 Street Looking East Page 11 of 14 17 . Looking north on 116tb Avenue ,. PaRe 12 of 14 18. 116th Avenue SE Looking North Page 13 of 14 ,------------------ 21. 116 1h Avenue SE Looking North at Benson Elementary School Page 14 of 14 lEGGEBRECtiT SHORT PLAT LOT POTENTIAL sruOY REPORT OWNER: ERVIN EGGEBRECHT 1 1044 SE 1 92ND STREET RENTON, WA 98055 AGENT: SHELLY FORD TRUVEST, LLC P.O. Box 1754 RENTON, WA 98057 PHONE 253-226-5825 FAX 253-226-8008 PREPARED By: ri PYRAMID . E NGnNEERBNG & LLC 29015 MILITARY ROAD S .. #544 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 PHONE 253-852·' , 64 FAX 253-859-2065 I EXPIRES 2-2-09 IREV!S~ONI JANUARY 1 8, 2008 K.C. O.D.E.S. 1L«»~§(U)Q»@7 BACKGROUND Eggebrecht (Truvest) Short Plat Lot Potential Study The Eggebrecht (Truvest) Short Plat is a 9-lot short plat proposed at 11044 SE 192nd Street (King County Application No. L07S0057). An existing dirt/ gravel road serves the existing lot and other adjacent lots. This unimproved road is situated within an existing flag lot (Mcintire -Parcel 6623400134), an access easement (over Vardeman -Parcel 6623400129), and the subject property (Eggebrecht -Parcel 6623400132). The project proposes a private road to be contained within access easements. The Plat Screening Transmittal for the project dated November 21, 2007 raises the question of whether or not more than 16 parcels could use this access. KCRS 2.06 limits the number of residences to 16 for a private street. DISCUSSION Part 1 -Determination via Granted Road Variance In 2006, a road variance was requested by the applicant from King County Traffic Engineering Section (Road Variance L06V0062) to connect the proposed private street to SE 192 nd Street. Wetlands to the north prevented a suitable access in that direction. On February 28, 2007 the variance was granted. The Road Variance Engineer, Mr. Craig Comfort, P.E. wrote in support of the variance, "The existing private gravel road will be improved to a KCRS minor access road classification. Approximately 15 lots are projected to be served by the road with future short platting of adjacent lots." A copy of the approved variance is provided in Attachment A at the end of this report. Part 2 -Determination via Short Term Perspective The Lot Potential Study map (next page) details the parcels in question. A discussion of each parcel is provided. Lot Owner: Christian. Lot size: 1.94 Acres. Zoning: R-8 Most of this parcel is wetland. Moreover, an existing public access to this parcel is provided at the northwest corner at the intersection of SE 189 th Street and 111 th Place SE. An existing house does use the existing dirt road to the south. However no more homes will be allowed to access this road from this parcel. Page 1 of 7 lot Potential Study ~.~ I fE.Ul9THst f J26982OOO70 2698200080 269B2OOD5O 1~9~_6(). ~9SOB<O ;~~ 1~!l5IU70 fE.1Iml1.CT 07.3000020 ~ ( 0143000010 07.3000030 0143000050 ,5659S1UBO 07.3000040 III ~ 1~950950 ~~1DJOO ~ Christian = j~95094o ~ , ·2698200221' 156595<)490 2698200220 014_ 1565950960 ,1565950660 074:J1JDOO8O 1 _SI!,II19TltI'L_ 66234DOO20 0743000010 2698200223 1565950970 ' 1~950670 -2698200222 1565950500 , 0743000090 R-8 269820022. 1665950510 1565950980 1565950660 ( R·18 Mcintire '565950520 1565950990 1565950650, . 6623400134 15.65950640 1~95053O 1665950630· R·12 Eggebrech R-8 1565951000' ~P~ '662:uDO 135 / 6-8944410000 6623400132 156595(1510' III /tj ~ 66234001361 1,5659S05Gq 1s6s9505BO ,-~ '6623400131 '565950550, ,- 6623(00120 , 1665950040 ,1665950590' . Slaughter J5659506DO 662:uDO,33 156595D610 1~95003O I 1565-951R<;r Herbel 1~950020 Vardeman 6623400131 1~951020 6623400129 1565950010 15 l / L- ··.192NO.s· + - 6623400'50 :'R-8 , 6623400151 6623400152' 662:UOO141 66234oo14D M22059002 0522059280' 73ODOOO39O 662:uD01~ R·12 Ie) _ .... Count, 01 116111 73O('l!'101''1400 ~~~o,::!,~ ~~~=:ta~~~$m:, w'::a=~ r:."J:~ :~~~~~~ :::r::. ~~~%:s-:.ull~~=~sc:~~ ~ ~: ~~~ :~~ til King County This document Is not Intended for use as 8 survey product. Ki:m. County shall not be liable for any general, special, Indirect, incidental, or conuquential demagesincludlng, but not limited to, losl revenues or lost pro I1!Islllling from the use Of misuse of the Information contaIned on this map. Any sale of this map or Informalion on this map Is prohibited except by written permiuion of King County. Date: 1/1612008 Source: King County iMAP. Property tnfotmation (http://www.metrokc.gov/GISIIMAP) Lot Owner: Mcintire. Lot size: 0.87 Acres. Zoning: R·8 This site currently has a Large, pLeasant home with a swimming pooL, both of which consume much of the parceL area. SLopes take up the remainder of the Lot. It is not a property considered "ripe" for redeveLopment. For this "Short Term" scenario, it is assumed that this parceL will not subdivide further. Lot Owner: SLaughter. Lot size: 0.48 acres. Zoning: Ro 8 An existing home is Located on this parceL and is adjacent to the proposed private street. It is unlikeLy this home wouLd be razed in the short term. Lot Owner: HerbeL. Lot size: 0.50 acres. Zoning: Ro 8 This site has no structures on the site and is most likeLy the onLy Lot that wouLd be deveLoped in the short term. It is highLy probabLe that no direct access to SE 192 nd Street wouLd be allowed forcing access to the proposed private road. ShouLd the parceL be subdivided, dedication of the frontage aLong the former private street wouLd be required. This dedication wouLd reduce the deveLopabLe size of the Lot to 0.41 acres and at the allowed density of Ro 8 onLy three Lots couLd be created. This deveLopment is highLy dependent on the owners of the Mcintire parceL since they have expressed no interest in dedicating or selling the flag portion of their Lot for public use. Lot Owner: Vardeman. Lot size: 0.39 acres. Zoning: Ro 8 The Vardeman parceL is situated adjacent to SE 192 nd Street and the proposed private street. One Large, existing home is on the Lot. ShouLd this site be redeveLoped frontage improvements will be required on two sides. ALong SE 192nd Street, 12 0 feet of property wouLd have to be dedicated to the pubLic right of way. This amounts to 154'x12'=1 ,848 sf. ALong the proposed road, a minimum of 15 0 feet wouLd need to be dedicated, or 130'x15'=1,950 sf. The totaL dedicated area wouLd be 0.09 acres, Leaving 0.3 acres to be deveLoped. At the zoning density of Ro 8, onLy two Lots couLd be deveLoped in the remaining area. The cost of removing the existing home to deveLop two new, smaller homes with fuLL frontage improvements wouLd be prohibitive. Therefore it is highly unlikely that any new residences would be developed at this lot. Part 3 -Determination via Long Term Perspective This assessment is broken down into two parts: the north portion and the south portion. Lot Owner: Mcintire. Lot size: 0.87 Acres. Zoning: Ro 8 This site currently has a Large, pleasant home with a swimming pooL, both of which consume much of the parcel area. The property size includes the 15 0 foot wide access "flag" to SE 192nd Street. This flag has an area of 470'x15'= 0.16 acres and grants access rights to other lots. If this flag is taken out, the deveLopabLe area is 0.71 acres. In addition, the wetland buffer to the Page 3 of 7 northwest infringes on the parcel further reducing the development potential. Likely only three new lots could be developed for a total of four. Lot Owner: Slaughter. Lot size: 0.48 acres. Zoning: R-8 An existing home is located on this parcel and is adjacent to the proposed private street. Should the parcel be redeveloped, dedication of the frontage along the former private street in the amount of 30-feet would be required. This dedication would reduce the developable size of the lot to 0.38 acres and at the allowed R-8 density only three lots could be created. Lot Owner: Herbel. Lot size: 0.50 acres. Zoning: R-8 This site has no structures on the site. With the zoning density allowed up to four lots could be developed. No direct access to SE 192nd Street would be allowed. However, this parcel was very recently subdivided via short plat. King County Code restricts redevelopment of new parcels for a period of 5- years. Should the parcel be redeveloped, dedication of the frontage along the former private street in the amount of 30·feet would be required. This dedication would reduce the developable size of the lot to 0.41 acres and at the allowed density of R·8 only three lots could be created. Lot Owner: Vardeman. Lot size: 0.39 acres. Zoning: R·8 The Vardeman parcel is situated adjacent to SE 192 nd Street and the proposed private street. One large, existing home is on the lot. Should this site be redeveloped frontage improvements will be required on two sides. Along SE 192 nd Street, 12-feet of property would have to be dedicated to the public right . of way. This amounts to 154'x12'=1 ,848 sf. Along the proposed road, a minimum of 15-feet would need to be dedicated, or 130'x15'=1,950 sf. The total dedicated area would be 0.09 acres, leaving 0.3 acres to be developed. At the zoning density of R-8, only two lots could be developed in the remaining area. The cost of removing the existing home to develop two new, smaller homes with full frontage improvements would be prohibitive. Therefore it is highly unlikely that any new residences would be developed at this lot. CONCLUSIONS Road Variance The road variance granted indicates by the County's own study that no more than 15 lots will use the new road. No justification or background is provided regarding how this decision was made, but it suggests some thought was provided. Based on Part 1 -Variance of the discussion above, less than 16 residences will be served by the proposed road which would allow the use of a private road. Page 4 of 7 Short Term In a realistic scenario, the Vardeman, Christian, Mcintire, and Slaughter parcels will not subdivide further because of the lot conditions and the existing residences that exist. Only Eggebrecht and the Herbel parcels are the most obvious parcels to subdivide. Eggebrecht is proposing 1 existing plus 8 new homes. Herbel could develop up to one plus 2 new lots. The total number of homes using the road in this case is 16. This is under the threshold for requiring a public road. Long Term The long term development scenario is very speculative, especially with respect to the Mcintire site. However, based on a "worst-case," fully· developed area, a summary of the number of residences which could use the north half of this road are as follows: Christian Lot: Residences: 1 Mcintire Lot: Residences: 4 Eggebrecht Lot: Residences: 8 Subtotal 13 This suggests that in the "fully developed condition," the north half of the proposed road can be used as a private road since the number of lots is less than 17. At the south half of the road, the number of lots is also highly speculative, but because the number of lots could exceed the threshold of 16 lots, it is treated differently. Based on a fully developed area, a summary of the number of residences which could use the south half of this road are as follows: North half: Residences: 13 Slaughter Lot: Residences: 3 Herbel Lot: Residences: 3 Vardeman Lot: Residences: 1 Eggebrecht Lot: Residences: 1 TOTAL 21 For the short term, the number of residences that will be served by the proposed private road does not exceed the threshold. Therefore a private street may be used. Although the area and zoning combine to suggest a maximum of 21 lots could be created, it is very speculative and in some cases, very unlikely. It should not be incumbent on the developer to anticipate redevelopment of existing developed parcels and to provide any more of a road than is reasonable for the subject development. Moreover, because Mcintire owns the flag access in front of all the parcels in question and has vehemently indicated that no dedication for public use will be offered, it will be very difficult for any developer to secure the necessary right of way. For these reasons, a private road is still proposed. Page 5 of 7 The proposed private road will include a half-street improvement section along . the southerly 260-feet in conformance with the Plat Screening TransmittaL In the event either the Mcintire, Slaughter or Herbel parcels are subdivided to their full potential, the number of residences will exceed the limit of 16 and appropriate right of way will need to be dedicated at that time for the southerly portion of the road. RECOMMENDATIONS For the purposes of this analysis, a reasonable approach to the road ownership is offered. For the conditions that exist now, in all likelihood, no more than 16 lots will utilize the road. Thus a private road is allowed. It is highly unlikely that Yardman, Christian and Mcintire will subdivide. It is also unrealistic to believe Slaughter will subdivide since a home exists there now. The only "wildcard" is HerbeL Should this parcel subdivide, the two extra lots would push the number of lots accessing this road over the threshold requiring the road to be public. Since the status of the road depends on that parcel developing, and because Mcintire has vehemently expressed no dedication to the public will be allowed on her flag portion of the parcel, the issue of making the road a public road is questionable at this time. It is therefore reasonable to allow the road to be private until such time that additional subdivisions occur. At that time another analysis based on a better understanding of the subdivision conditions can be used. It is recommended that for the short term the new road be a private road, though constructed to public standards. Page 6 of 7 Road services Division Department of Transportatlon KSC-TR-0222 201 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104-3856 February 28, 2007 TruvestLLC P.O. Box 1754 Renton, W A 98057 RE: Road Variance L06V0062 -Truvest Short Plat Dear Applicant: Thank you fur your application for a variance from the King County Road Standards (KCRS). You requested a variance from Section 2.10 of the KCRS concerning the intersection spacing for the access onto SB 192nd Street. The location at SB ] 92nd Street is a principal arterial for which the KCRS requires a minimum of ],000 feet of intersection spacing. We reviewed your proposal and agree that the existing private road extending northward at the III block of SE 192nd Street is the most viable access to your site. Wetlands within sensitive areas and within County road easement obstruct potential road connections to the north of the site. The intersection spacing to the north from the private road is 375 feet to I 13th Way SE, and to the south is 330 feet to II Oth Place SE. I approve the reduced intersection spacing for the proposed road improvement of the existing private road. This decision applies only to KCRS identified in the variance request. All other design requirements in the KCRS imd other regulations, such as surface water msnagement and zoning, must still be satisfied for a land use permit application. The applicant retains the rights and privileges afforded by King County Code and adopted Public Rules pertaining to road . variance processing (KCC 14.42, PUT 10-2). This variance decision is valid fur one year from date ofletter unless an associated land use permit is pending or submitted within the one year period. In these cases, the variance decision is valid for the duration of the permit processing. TruvestLLC February 28, 2007 Page 2 A copy of staff's analysis, findings, arul conclusions is enclosed. If you have any questions, please call Craig Comfort. Road Variance Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, at 206-263-6109. S;;n:lb/t!DvJnaAA-~ Paulette Nonnan, P.E. County Road Engineer PN:CC:kc cc: James Sanders, P .E., Development Engineer, Land Use Services Division (LUSD), Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) Pete Dye P .E., Senior Engineer, LUSD, DDES Linda Dougherty, Division Director, Road Services Division (RSD), Department of Transportation (DOT) Matthew Nolan, P.E~ County Traffic Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT Fatin Kara, P.E., Supervising Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT Kris Langley, Senior Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT Craig Comfort, P.E., Road Variance Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT ......... _ ................ -------- King County Road Sarvlces Division Departmcmt of'l'l'ansportatin TraIIic Ea.ginef:rinr Section loIS KSC-TR.0222 201 South Jackson StrHt Soattlo. WA 98104 February 28, 2007 TO: Variance File FM: Craig Comfort, P.E., Road Variance Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section RE: Road Variance L06VOO62 -Truyest Short Plat Applicant's Presentation: L The proposed Trovest Short Plat is for nine lots on an existing private street extending north off the King CoWlty principal arterial ofSE 192nd Avenue. The private gravel road is 375 feet west of I 13th Way SE and serves five homes. A private road to the west, 110lh Place SE is 330 feet from the proposed short plat access road (the existing gravel road). The King County Road Standards (KCRS) requires 1,000 feet of intersection spacing along a principal arterial. 2. There is no viable alternative access to the short plat. The existing gravel road access is in private road easements. A thirty-foot public road easement extends from III th Place SE to the northwest comer of the proposed short plat However, several wetlands within the easement area block any road connection. To the west of the public easement is a tract owned by King County as access to a pond. The tract also is encumbered with private access easements and the easement holders will not permit a road within the tract. 3. The existing private gravel road will be improved to a KCRS minor access road classification. Approximately 15 lots are projected to be served by the road with future short platting of adjacent lots. Staff's Findings and Conclusions: I. Concurrence with the applicant's presentation. The wetlands to the north and the limited road easement width ofJO feet all but preclude a road connection. 2. The entering sight distance at the access point to SE 192nd Street exceeds KCRS minimums. ;: i . , ~' 1 1 I ~ , , , , i t u.5.I. , r ! ! , 1 ~ ..I,l f .~ ! ~ II ; ,. I i ~ ~ i II ~J I '" i"'- i Ell ... I 3 ~ i~ Ii i C , Q i1 i. I , < L: &. .e we. \ , '. w' :rl" . 4.to" i I IDIIIO SI " ... 00UI-0480 • ... , . a' :: __ _ \. _ 9 l!";.i!!l:.!!l..f:I::.., (ROBERT !lClVlllE BD. DO mI. (ST. 2-5-1t17 • .. EGGe:BREQlTSHoRTPLAT FLOOD PLAIN DE I ERMINATION REPORT OWNER: ERVIN EGGEBRECHT 1 1044 SE 1 92ND STREET RENTON. WA 98055 AGENT: SHELLY FORD TRUVEST. LLC P.O. Box 1754 RENTON. WA 98057 PHONE 253-226-5825 FAX 253-226-8008 PREPARED By: tj PYRAMBD . E NGINEERDNG .LLC 29015 MILITARY ROAD S .• #544 IiIIlAUINIIFD~ OO~ FEDERAL WAY. WA 98003 PHONE 253-852·' , 64 FAX 253·859·2065 K.C. D.D.E.S. EXPIRES 2-2-09 JANUARY 1 8. 2008 SECTION 1.0 2.0 FIGURE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 APPENDICES TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE Project Overview ................................................................... Floodplain Determination ..................................................... . TITLE Site Location Map ......................................................................... . Project Development Plan .......................................................... . Drainage Basins ................................................................................ . Drainage System Locations ......................................................... . County Drainage Facility D91899 Schematic ...................... . County Drainage Facility D92060 Schematic County Drainage Facility D92383 Schematic A Christian Short Plat Grading and Storm Drainage Plan PAGE 1 9 PAGE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 B Benson Woods Roadway and Storm Drainage Improvement Plans C Site Photos D Project Topographic Survey Ground Shots 1.0 -Project Overview 1.1 Purpose of Study The project is a 9-lot Short Plat. Preliminary Short Plat Application was made in August of 2007. On November 21, 2007 King County DOES requested additional information regarding the project. One of the requested items was a determination of the flood plain related to the wetland located to the north of the project. This report will present the findings of the Floodplain Determination Study for the offsite area north of the project. 1.2 Location The project site is located within Unincorporated King County, Washington, generally south southeast of the city of Renton and north northeast of the city of Kent. The project address is: 11044 SE 192 nd Street, Renton, WA 98055. (See Figure 1 -Project Location Map.) Parcel No. 6623400132 has an area of 1.95 Acres. 1. 3 Proposal The proposed project is a 9-lot short plat on a 1.95-acre site. (See Figure 2 -Project Development Plan.) The result of the project will be the construction of 8 new, urban-style homes fronting on a paved culdesac access. An existing home on the site will remain. A Boundary Line Adjustment will revise the western boundary of the parcel where an existing encroachment occurs. This will resolve an existing fence encroachment issue . . 1.4 Existing Conditions The site is currently one parcel with one home located on the southern area. The home is surrounded by lawn with a carport and paved driveway. The area north of the home is pasture-like with tall grass and a laurel hedge along the eastern limits. A wetland is located off-site on the north end of the property. The site area generally drains from the wetland area in the north to the west southwest. A wooden fence is located at the western boundary. A gravel driveway in an existing access easement provides access to the existing home and several others. A fair amount of off site area appears to drain toward the project area. However, most of the waters are intercepted and routed around the project site so that little offsite surface water actually enters the site. Figure 3 -Drainage Basins provides a summary of the area that drains toward the site. These areas are divided into two areas: Offsite Wetland Basin and Offsite Road Basin. The Offsite Wetland Basin to the north of the project has an area of about 2.3 acres. According to the King County iMAP website, two residential drainage control systems are located in the vicinity of the project site in this basin. Figure 4 shows the locations of the systems. Figures 5 and 7 are King County schematic diagrams of those systems. Offsite Road Basin to the east generally drains toward the existing gravel driveway where it is intercepted by a number of drainage systems and is conveyed to SE 192 nd Street. The King County iMAP website shows there is one drainage control system in this basin (Figure 6). The drainage control system is an underground pipe that discharges to the south, rather to the roadway to the west. For the purposes of this study, this drainage basin is ignored. - 1 - I fIGURE 1 c PROJECT lOCATION MAP lQ] Highlighted lJeature 1-_1 c:ountv Boundory )( c:lountnln Poalul Hlgln:taya ;V Incorpombd Atoll StnIotls (eem) Legand ~HlgIMay pAltarials f/1.oaI o Lalloa and Large Rivera ;./ Strall_ D PlltC:ola o Pllrtla :,,~,!~~~n..!.~u..~ao~ .. ~~.map"!l_s_~ ~!!~ ~~ ~~n!! !~_n_~ 8 V8~.!'!.,O sources ~~_ 18_ s~ :~ ~_8ng., ~~_?~~ n~~~:_~~g County makes no representations or warranties, express or Implied, as to accuracy. completeness, timeliness, Of rights to the use of such Information. This documeolls nolintended for use as 8 survey pmducllOng County shall nol be liable for any general. spoclal, indIrect, Incidental, or consequential damages Inctuding, but not limited 10, Iosl revenues or lOst profits resuttlng from Ihe use or misuse of the infotmatlon contained on Ihls map. Any sale of Ihis map or Information on this map Is prohibited except by wrilten permission of King County. Data: 1/1SJ2008 Source: KIng County IMAP· Property lnfonnatlon (http:/twww.metrokc.gov/GISIIMAP) tll King County , '-_., e , I . "c-~;:,: : . . c_ , .. " PARCEl. UO. (,698200224 ZeWNG RS <"---_._-". ---------, , , I HOUSE _ ...• _--.------... _; f'~.Rc(t ,'.:0. 6t;2.H{ .. \(}!,H lCN!JiG 9:$ "." ,--" ;--._.- I ... ! , HWS( ", ..... : " 0_:-_.". _. _____ •• " ... " "..".r,,/,,/ \ .... , ' / \ // HCHS£ \ , \ , \ \ ' \ \,\ \ \ \ / " "-. ~~ '~$ PAf!Cfl NO. 662J4C~)lJ6 ZONiNG R8 PARCH NO. 552.34001J-:! ?ONING R8 I)AIlC£L NO. 662.HOO1.~5 lCNlNG RS .', .""=-.-----------------------~!:~~-~~'--lit 1Y~-----=--------_. ___ I .. 1-", _ C ___ U11I.lIY, , 1-. 88' I I ~I ~I I ~ \ 15'1 ,BSBLI ... --... , , I \ : " : \ I \ I , , --- 7~" • lRI I 1RACf D it __ U1ILI1Y -I 1RACf iii I'llEIIAIID ~ I, 0> 5' ~ .",--, :>ARC£L 1m , ,'/1" 269B2oo220 , , , I is l , ,-' " ,.,/ 46' ... --... , , , \ : "1 I ;e \ I , , , ... __ ... ... --.... , , I \ : 6 :l:: \ I , , .... ... __ ... / P.~.HC£L NO 66231,00132 lCMIo.!G iH ....... --... I ' : 5 " \ I , I • , I N ... __ ... "It ---... , , I \ : ~ :- \ I ;; , / , , ---ZONiNG ~8 " ,',' t " .-,'..... --- . --,"' 98" I 46' L 46' I 46' I 46' 1RACf A _ CCII1RIJI. 'j lJ _1\IIlIA!. s· ,r ---.~---~--~--~--. ....... --,.----.. --... ---~ ~ r---,--~-,-----·~-_ __==__d ______ ~~ ,,, sal' 3' 3"W 2 ' ' ---, , ..... _._ .. _-. '" I 5 an '1... L_. ___ ._.~I :.... __ , t.---. ___ .~! __ .. _._. ___ ._'"_._. __ . __ . __ '_ .. _.10 04' j 2' ~----.- PAHCEl NO. 26982COno ZONING ~11 : EASDIDfr cc .. ~oo j I _ oJ I t.., I -, I_-_~ ro"': f I I I I I . __ ._, I .... , ! t I I I _ :--, ,.... I --.--~-! ~H._._._._._ .... PARCEL NO. ! '-1 CONOO J9444JOQOO I I / lONIWC Ri2 --------___ J --"'--J I , 1--_./"·--·- " I I I I ' .. , '~-: ~:; , 1=_" PARCEL NO. o52J·~r..OI20 ZONING RI2 ,-------, ') / CONDO . _ ;-'."1 I , "! PARCEL NO 89-44470000 ZONING !H2 L PMiC·E:.. NO 652:W:(]iJl .. ~~;tI}!.-l~-; .)(8 ilARcn NO. 6.sn~ClJl29 lCNIUG Ra -+oJ en o CD .s:::. -+J :::i o en ~ ti:~ OI :r:~ 001- f-:J I~ 135 a:: I-w9 w (9 (9 W ill iz zg 0(3 ~~ ",:r ~~ 00. Cl~ Zz N:J "'0 -u "'(3 II,lz v-vI< o (9 z .. -~" 0:: II., OW ~~ -W a." ::EZ t~ ~_ ~"'li! cr (9 u o~~ >-Z ~"'IL o..W ..Ja:<v e..J§~~ :::J~N -;> ., l!-'~ ~~1Il o ~tII Olw% NILa. ~ I I I I I I -II I I o Cf : '; Z :3 j !! I! ! i I ea I <;=> !i aL-__________________________________________________________________________ _ i figure 2 -Project Development Plan fiGURE 3 " DRA~NAGE BASINS I: HJgIIIlgl\tlld Feature l _J 1-_1 County Boundary )( t!lountaln PGaks ContounI (5ft dalt) ;./ toO;SOO;IOOO ;./0III0r HJgIII:rI'Iya /'/ lncotpOrlltl/d Arell tP,H.lgIn:AIy pArtariols j/"-o Lakea and L.argo Rivero ;./ StrolllllS o Porcola o Porta Thft Informallon InClulHIo on lI11a map 99 \HIen corniJMttU uy I\lnp o..uunlY B.a" rom a V8neLY 0 sources ang 18 SUu,..C. 10 WlBnge WlUlUU nouce. Nng cOunty -makes no re-presentations or warranties, express or-Impl.ed, as to accuracy, oompleteMss, timeliness, or rlghls to the use or such Inlormelion. This docomenlis nol intended for use as 8 survey product. KIng County shaU ~ be liable for any general. special, Indirect, Incidental, 01 consequential damages including, bot nollimiled 10, Iosl revenues or Iosl ~fits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Asrot sale of this map or Information on this map Is prohibited 8ICcepi by written permlailon of King County. Date: 1116/2008 Source: KIng County IMAP -Property Information (http://www.melrokc.govfGIS/iMAP) [41 King County F~GURE 4, a EXISTING DRAINAGE CONTROL SYSTEMS ~V~ -n '"," .~ .. " . - + y I -r- '----i----l 1--+---1 I---t---I' I t---t--tJ 1----1'--1 i ® !~:~';.:':;::~I R_u~_ ::.~:o Water and Land Reaource Division ____ -.LI;mI!>iZ...L.LL.;..,JI:..b.8/,~ ___ _I KROLL PAGE _---i~t&... __ TB PAGE __ ...I6~811i6tbPu2",---_ lFAClDLlITY SlKlE'fCH o SPECIAL USE PERMIT DNOMOW o MOW ~ SPECIAL MOW 200 SQ. YDS. llIIow/hl!!ndbrush slopes only. Pond bottom pll!!nted with weill!!nd pll!!nta n I LOT. I I I LOT> MAINT. DIVISION OUT OF SERVICE SE 189THST LOU 3 NO ____ L, _________ ~ ________ ~~,,~C~~ LOT. HOUSE 16$1& L __________________ _ LOT 7 C6·2 HOUSE ,_ TRACTB WETLAND POND TYPE DATE -...!t:~:Mil--f INITIALS -SAB ~ NTS .. cttAINUNK FENCE '-------------------------- ~@g. ...... '.' au .~1!!72itrar ilIaiiIjj&lit ' .. .. :) • l [I" I 0 I fU:lwr. ~' -1 • ... - /.' = ,. I I r~ .. . ' ..... ...... ~ . 1'1 ~ lIi0 7 .... • ; ~ ~ -. .-,~. ""." t.":.. ro; .. ~~ ~ - fi~ure 6 • ••••••••• . . i PROJECT NO .. KING COUNTY =---~--~~~~~~~~===-PROJECT Department of Natural Resources LOCATION Water and Land lResource Division KROLL PAGE TB PAGE CHRISTIAN SHORT PLAT 11129 SE 189TH PLACE 604E SUB BASIN BLACK 68602 TYPE POND fACiliTY SKETCH SHEET MAlNT. DIVISION 4 DATE 09129197 o SPECIAL USE PERMIT· o NO MOW rII MOW 45 sa VDS o SPECIAL MOW t CS/CB-'::1Q:;'f:~r---'- GRAVEl. ORIVI!WAY 11129 OUT OF SERVICE N INITIALS· PJS SE 189TH PI CB-5 GRAVEl. ACCESS ROAD C~ 2.0 -Floodplain Determination 2.1 Introduction The level of study and method of floodplain determination is outlined in the King County 2005 Surface Water Design Manual under Special Requirement #2 -Flood Hazard Area Delineation. For this project, a Minor Floodplain Study is used to determine the flood plain limits and elevation because the project is adjacent to a flood hazard area. Because no approved floodplain study for the wetland has been performed, the "point of compliance" technique is required for this study. However, in this case, a point of compliance analysis is not applicable for the simple reason that the drainage from the proposed short plat project does not affect the wetland or the floodplain since no runoff from the project enters that area. In effect, the wetland/floodplain is above the project. The floodplain related to the wetland is thick with woods. This study will consider the areas surrounding the area to determine the limits of the flood plain. For this study, an analysis of information provided through prior projects and other existing information will be used to evaluate the floodplain limits and elevation. 2.2 Key Parcel (No. 2698200220) The parcel to the north of the subject project is relatively large and includes the wetlandlfloodplain in question. This site is sloped on the east side which drains west to the wetland. This parcel was subdivided under the name of Christian Short Plat (discussed below). Three smaller lots were subdivided from the original which still has an existing house on it. This parcel has one home with a constructed pond just north of the wetland. 2.3 Wetland Limits The wetland limits along the subject project edge were delineated by The Riley Group on April 20, 2007. This wetland study was provided in the Level 1 Drainage Analysis provided as part of the Original project application. The wetland boundaries have been provided on the original project plan. 2.4 Existing Drainage Systems An existing pond is located above the wetland adjacent to an existing home. This pond is the result of an impoundment presumably for the purpose of enjoyment for the existing residence there. It is not evident how water reaches this pond. This pond discharges to the wetland area. It could also serve as a sort of detention pond, buffering the wetland from some surface runoff. Two projects abut the parcel containing the wetland and one contributes surface runoff directly to the wetland area. The other appears to accept overflow from the wetland. The first project was the Christian Short Plat. Engineering plans prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers were originally approved in May of 1996. Four lots were created from one original 2.6-acre parcel. This project utilized a small detention pond which discharged directly to the wetland via a level spreader device (See Appendix A for a copy of the Grading and Storm Plan). - 9 - The Grading and Storm Plan for this project shows considerable information related to the wetland and the flood area. For instance a "Wetland Outfall Pipe" is located along the west edge of the wetland with an invert elevation of 474.6. The wetland boundaries are shown. Finally, an "Assumed Base Flood" elevation of 476.0 is provided. The area within this assumed flood plain has presumably been recorded as a drainage easement. The second project is the Plat Clf Benson Woods. This project located west of the wetland/floodplain area was a 6-lot subdivision that was completed in 1994. The engineering plans were prepared by John R. Newell Inc. and were approved in May of 1991 (See AppendixB for a copy of the Roadway and Storm Drainage Improvement Plan). For unknown reasons, the project constructed a wetland area in Tract B. The bottom of this wetland was constructed with a bottom elevation of approximately 474.0. The slopes within this wetland area are labeled on the construction plan as 2: 1. At the eastern edge adjacent to the wetland area the distance from the project limit and the bottom of the pond is less than 6-feet. At a 2: 1 slope for a distance of 6-feet beginning at elevation 474.0, the elevation of the ground at the edge of the project is calculated to be 477.0. It would appear that this elevation offers wetland area water the opportunity to exit the natural wetland area to the constructed wetland area via an overflow at elevation 477.0. Finally, this same plan identifies an existing overflow to the south out of the constructed wetland area. This overflow elevation is listed as 475.3. This assures that the elevation of the water within the constructed wetland never exceeds 476.0. 2.5 Site Visit On January 10, 2008, Pyramid Engineering visited the project site to review the site conditions. Photos from this site visit are provided in Appendix C. During the site visit, a couple interviews were conducted. The son of the current landowner, Ervin Eggebrecht, was available at the time of the site visit. When questioned, he indicated that he has never seen water moving from the wetland area onto the property. Mr. and Mrs. Cheema, the land owners living at 18925 11th Place SE just west of the wetland, were also briefly interviewed. Both indicated they had never seen the water in the wetland area very high and no flooding has ever been observed. 2.6 Discussion Ground measurements within the Eggebrecht property performed as part of a topographic survey by Baima Holmberg show that all on-site elevations near the wetland/floodplain area are above elevation 479.0 (Appendix D). It is probable that the elevation of the water in the wetland varies during larger storm events. In those situations, it is likely that when the water reaches elevation 474.6, water begins to exit the area via the "Wetland Outfall Pipe" located at the west edge of the wetland. Water probably also begins to infiltrate once the surface water extents move beyond what is imagined to be an impervious soil lens, which is likely the reason for the wetland. Finally, once the water elevation reaches 477.0, it -10 - overflows into the constructed wetland area to the west. When the water within this constructed wetland reaches elevation 475.3 it begins to overflow to the south. According to information from prior projects, it does not appear that water within the wetland north of the proposed project reaches elevation 478. Elevations within the project site near the wetland area are above elevation 479. Therefore, it follows that water never .overflows from the existing wetland onto the project site. The floodplain limits are therefore contained within the parcel to the north of the project and do not cross onto the subject project parcel. For the purposes of determining a floodplain limit, a conservative maximum floodplain elevation of 479 is assumed. 2.7 Conclusion The facts are as follows: o The Christian Short Plat drainage plan shows a "Wetland Outfall Pipe" with an invert elevation of 474.6 o The Christian Short Plat drainage plan shows a floodplain elevation was assumed to be at elevation 476.0. o There is no record of any flooding occurring above this elevation o Based on field observations, there are no indications of any overflowing from the area o None of the adjacent, interviewed neighbors have witnessed any flooding o An overflow from the wetland area into the constructed wetland for the Plat of Benson Woods project is calculated to be roughly elevation 477.0 o An overflow from the Benson Woods constructed wetland exiting to the south is listed as 475.3 o Existing surveyed topography shows there are no ground shots within the subject property adjacent to the wetland with an elevation of less than 479.0. The floodplain limits appear to be contained within the parcel to the north and do not extend onto the subject project parcel. A conservative maximum floodplain elevation is assumed to be 479. -11 - ! ;1 j i • ! I i I ~ I ? " " , :. ---------;J;' _ :"-l. -_ nt'>_~ T-OO I: ~~-:-I"" ~ II ~I-.. ~~"=" ..... ," 'll .., III2IICJ t"o"." n i '\ \_~ BOlJ.AAD P\.ACEIlEHT OETAlL _.l'(I. ...... ...... -~r.r,. ! ~~~-tfO== fllO_wa)W_t1IC!I4 ~ -... -• ! I ~ r{u,sU>.)D-IIIAD._ " 1;:;'1 JiBoIOIAELB BIlU..ARD DEfA!L. -.- " ......-DET ..... .. -ti'\ Q1 • fWPJII[~ AMUa£ ... ~ M-It' II£lOI1S OTUfOOl<$ AAf ~rOR~\ISi~ nc: CAAlt I:;T\I ca ~ ...... "" """', ~~ -"11£ PItO.'tIm fOtlt'PlI'f(tjKC€, M«l rF PI'( ON llf,: a.os. ~I$ D[SQ,G rOIl f,$NC T;f: GlIAl[' ~ OIl .mtOUt ".- 'TYPE 30 CATCH EIAS:lI (Y ARO DIlAOO 1C111O~ .' """" ...... ,,= C; .. 7 ..... A5WIIID IMSl ~~ a.""'I.o =_ ...... """ ........ U~II$'" _ ....... ....... ""'" """ """" ""'" ----~--.------- GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN 11. PORTION OF BEC110N 32. lWP. 23 N., ROE. 5 e.. WM. KINCl COUNTY, WABHl'IOTOH .. i • " " .- \ \ " \ \ " . \ , '\ I \ I ( \ t ! LOT 4 l~ \ """ ... : \. \ \ '. \ \ I \ \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ . \ ',\. I " \ <ioi \. \ \ " \ \ \ ~ . \ ~ ! I I \ \ \ \ \ . ~"""'-""'·-"'·I I I , ", \ ' \ \ \ \ \ "'~~~~n~ , \ l-.. .':.....,~!i " _ __ _ Ln .• ItD. •. ¢.::;;r;; (11' t .. ~ I=:%J ~~;nw:r;;~::::~"'~'~~' . ..gj~.!h H. ~.":.~Q'1.' 'f1L==:= =''' Ar!(~~ _"'J r. -1IUCl' 100 1.1 It' so ., .. ~-. -<~ft::T:---~-.. -w--'~='i "'" . , ..... TJIioCl""1I(lIIII[$U«S ~~D£1lICq[D ~ "" ""'" ~ ~ a: fW.y ~ _ ClIIIlIIiXIC IVIRS ~ IIC ~ 1liio1i ~ OF ~ ICIlUIZD ~ CIIQIIM_ ~ .u _ ~ __ a: IifRaOI W IXIfISlQ.CDl <a:CY. ~ 'IQ __ .J»-1D-~ w::I' Cl CCII'IDtD or.to -===u:::J~ -==RD~QCJICIIII:~ _ a ~ fI:CIt JIll; o::xc:rIII SOtt ~ fII ~ I:dQLIZD. GI or Q:IIIDC1:III I!GI !lIW:I cr fD.DIOI:t III ___ It~ ~ &ZI ~ Q'"...u:.. mcu::as .-: r ...... \1 ICUC u= c:cf QfttI '" , 1I11~S=PU. .'( '1:' '4 CI 4Jla .JI;,' ~ CL~~~10:::0 ~ _ ~ at ~ .... ~ IICI\IICIa. I:DIOCIL CI. .... '":-.t ~otUa:lI:Il'U£Dcr.~~~1ZlIC(o:z::;:r.c IIl1C1c::::a:1i11.M:~~1I)1ICtI:I:~ 1111 ....-aro=lllSl'GII~fII_.....---'-1&SDa:1I« ~fIIM~ I =VOU OOJ VoG CCI,lS IIIIIt ~ ..... UTAC>I SiQIt to IIOST Wrltt fWO i .. I • ., . • -. A) nt: ~ SICIt 5tW1 u: f'QSII]) II nf. ~ emnw n£ SDGrlM" IIIIIP I:I.ITDt '5[f8JOI; ~ 011 srn.o.tl( r.w;I iUO M QI:lIDOG """" -. B)act $GIll ~ u: J'OSltD 1'01 tof FQIt t"4Jft ,~(T rx SDQ1l'I[ IIIIIP cam IIIQ $IOIt1. a $!ATOC[D • ~ \.OCf,101. I.E> II n£ a.aotSI' PO;fI ro til[ PIII:II'CaD ~_ SiZ:IIS w.y -'LSQ I:t lTT.lfCHD) ", ..... ¢)5:QI(J"':.-....m.c RlIt 12-'0 nDII: DO IXUItf IU:IJXlQ1 NIO UfG ~ 0MSICm lCIlII-llt:Ji fV:Q: SCII'nUSl a:u.rvut. ICl c::I:$-l. = COUNTY WETl..AI(O/SlREAM s:oN INSTAUAlION DETAIL "" .. - !.,E(l!:tp c= • ~~:-~I ----~-------... ----"""=*'-- '" D ;= .L .( . ..; ;:':.<If; """""" ....... , , ..... ""'" _""'-'<1 --tXIStM COHrOURS· I'ROPOS.ED STOIN t.B£ I'IIOI'QS[O SIORM 0RACIt ......ars """"'" SI'OT """'" f;'~\ \'. ((\;'QEClroFLAi"i i~"~'jb,!"r ~ I ~~ i I ~ ~ I I I! ~ il l j H Ii qiq I AI I ! ~ g ~~ x ~~ < >0 ~ <=~:JI 2<;:;; ~3:** ':!,..:!t!:! ~ffig8 :;o~!:!!!::! Ii it I~ -. u , t o "--~M...:. .--• T'--I ~". "" .~ ~ ~~. C:-::...:J.;,.<o ~VW4r; ~ ~ , 1 r -----:-.. ;;;;:;;;;;;iiYi;;iii:i'"'::::;;::--'i=O""j % ~,.....~ 0 'K / I ~!"fA .4' '\ :<" $ V!.. f:1IB/'l1l ""'-.,~ -~ ... ! V' Eli .... , 'MOl I~ I" I ~ I ~ ... ""_.1"1 it" -~------- t , u ~ SCAt..£: I~ & ~ fl~dJe" I 2 (;:,--TYPe r .. c' OM"" UN~ nNCE ~~ J4~ ,sfD_Pt.I.NN4U "'1"'14'64T~ PElt APJVA ~ PtAN ~ 71 ". . ---'"""'--_ .... _-------_._-------------_ .. _ .. --_., .... _---I'"~ .. ___ .. ___ • __ 1>11 .. ___ • ___ • __ ._ .... 1>11 ... _. __ ... ____ .... IOOUiI_ -_ .. _--... _-_ .. _ .. _----"" --_ .. _._-----------_._ .. _--_.-----_ .. _--_ .. _-_ .. -.... -_ .. _--------- 1':,~" .. t~.' r"1" .... • :t.'·7~· ......... , !. ... : ...... ..;, " •• «' ";"''£0- f "'. ~'t,.t;' " .. ~ IItJ(U)JfI(; _ UM) 1IC\'El.0IW0IT .-1 -~H'-L ~ ~"'S rIM "If. PLAN-ll?ACT ,,~ WETLANDS ,,-zo' /'II)T~: GeAOe TPACT 'lJ' TO Ei. 41'" ~'I "·s. =.:=.=-~c::..-..:.=-.. _ .... _---(II _ .. ___ .. _ ...... __ • __ 479 oJ , Si.8 '( nIL !IZL.. C6 MI. ~ i11?£ /J l. d6'. PIlW"4! ZrPAYrD '=~~u.,,, I DICAlNAC"-e,,,,.. I DlIWWAY Mit'· 'ciu ~ ) ACa~$ Ru,.;y CII i 41S~'" .,j. , ... ,. Sl3 INV.. It"; "'*'* 4,...el/:, , ~ 14$><1'1["'7 ~. iJ _.-'" ~' .. '~I'IIf().~ ___ ~ IV·a--CQ\C ., an -~ .' L --N"-q-~ ... m·~c..ttP..m·: ~ CMP." asx u.z' 7.rZIS' otJ.5 'IJ"05 'J dP~ !i'IA ~4~..S$ cg.,frYPElU CMP.. f1I fJ:MIII R1J1~ ... ..,.-4,5 "'3% (Z"t~~INfI.~ ~ 41$.SS INV. ~ 4""..17 IItV.. ~~41S$t) Ir"S" 4r,,.,· SCALE: HQIIIZ 1£.R7: • KING CO, MM. A..5 ~eo lJY WA')fI<oIE /11114//4/ Pl"'.II.tJ/J \a_ -""" (Tel ~ENAII{J JI3. -.-£La -'ll- '" "" """''"' ... ~~1%ff~1 WETlAND.s frs, SEE ----• :::-::""!t __ "::.::::.::==-=-_-=-.:...-:::: .. -:. r ,r fj 1 .-,,-~ R/W H' ,I R/W __ --.I H' l""l F thl' 'of' ,.. "",,,'} 1 Inl _41: 1 : ------_.,,------_. _ ... _--..-III _________ ••• ____ _ ~ itt! . I{AIlDONi Y $PAC/D JIE]'~ lAND PLANT GIOU'5> • __ __ SJlAll U Pi,ANTeD WIIN· "S'.. • IN rill! ~ PElt T~ ~~ tN..! M'z N7 • {<ANT""" -"'''''''''. ~'W" V ¥-v ~or1~"'~ .• =====.::--==--===..-:::=...--------_ .. =;.c".:--=.:.oc:=::c:::-.:~'!.:.."';!,..-::: ' .. .. _---.......... __ ... __ ._. :'.::.::..~:..-:."!::;r,:~..:::-.---------_ .. _---------.-..... ~---.--I tr ~ M C~~ SHAU. "II'DOO-• ~ ..Nt V-~ SeEQ<O '" GRA". ~ J....J.,j ~ Ttu PtJAO AND PtANTJ -Q' 0 SNA/.L tJE MOIVIT(JIUD 0< Rc 1;> ~ {? C::t ~. r:g f:1f!:{,~rv --_ .. _-._-_ .......... _ .. ------------_. --_._--------- \....,sJ .... ~ -z..,::l ~ D4MU I M()()U _ M4~aPtAN. MJ~: SEE ·P!.IIN-lJETEHTION poNO- Fe' NTA/t.5 /'lOT ~"N. DETAIL WETLAND 5""' POND PLANTS 1"'t.10· ---;;Vi----' ... 'l .... "IOtI ....• ~.·I •• .J . -.- -...,~ - ----_ .. _--_ .. .. _--.. _oo_ .. _ .. __ ._r ... ___ _ _ .... _-------_ .. _._-----_._-_ .. _ ... _.-_._--_._---. ===------_ .. _--... _._ .... _._ .. ----_ ... -.. -. .... --. ---_ .. _---., .. _- 1'!; __ "~!\I1I_nm l, :l.1d1. ... _ .. __ .. _ •• _I"'-.." _t ___ tuoo.lou "'"'" .... _ .... ,,_ .... _ ..... 1l."' .. '.11. __ ......--.-. I . .u_"._ ...... ___ "''''''''''''''''0<1 .. _ .' ___ 7_' .. _ .... ___ of_ l~~ ~~~) I. ~ ~E (CAAL1I ~) J. WA1i1 ~y (QlHANTJ/# .JALOIEN1rtSII) .. 1UtJ·,.,.t YfJU",-fW*; DD<l"JIIQ)" AU PLANT' AND pLANTING .sJ.IAU se DONE (JHOQ THE ~lIPEI£Vlil()N C~ WETLAND .sI"ECIAUY A/oD AP~EIJ _'I l::hJG C1:XJNTY. _n\l:l~,..I~;O'OlP1.J.'l/It_~I'" I. s". -.. .. "'"'' _ tWo,... .... ' '"'" , .. , ..... _ I. " ... ,,"'If'.to..... ......... _ ~ ............ ..-.... ...,t ...... nol ......... __ , ... 1 ___ I .... _ "" -.,,. ,.,1_ ."'1"". 1. __ 1 .. _ .. 5<0 .... _ .... 1* ...... _ .... _. l ... __ ....... tloo" .. _I' ... h' __ ' __ ~.Sl .... ' .. _ >11011 c.>' .... _ ...... _ ..... __ ,., .. __ "-_''''''_'n. I ........... -. ............... _ ........ _ .... n""_ ..... . .... --. .. _n .. _ ....... , .m .. ,_ .. ,,_ ......... caI .. -. ...... 1<01-.1 """_,, ... m loll ,11_. ,., _,, __ .r _Ift .... u fIr __ .... ~ ... Io ...... I101 .... 1. seE t:J4ME5~~ M!4INT~ ~ R;/{ At;DITION4L. ~rAl~. o!j. Gr<tNt.~5 WU'Af't/) UPIl~$£NT.471W!" .!!HAt! ~ovr~ qN4t CON/P/.IAHCE R!P(J2!S ro KING CDlJN/'f IM:if!ECT/CN OIYI$!CW . t --D-;c",,::;,= ... ~ -r---l I 'I .~ \.f'~~"""'- I EXISTING PAYr ""'" IIOU.ED -ri!lT t ' LOCATION ()F SAW' an , ! /Inw to"tHisTiiE'" ~ ... """''''''' ""..-r =¥~ .. !".,. . -_ .. ,; i .;.;;.- I mUD CtM8IW.q «r,"'''l4 4Z.·fZ9~ .'l-~·~M.P. IJAS-8UILTH A5-8LJItr /1474 TAKEN F/iDIt1 ~/£lO .:iIH!VEY 1147A ~t/~NtsJIED BY AfDJECT SliliVcYOR WAYNE MAIN P.L.5. (MARCil 1992) I L zit· MIN. C~T. KPTH ell SUiF SASE CR$£ tllt-.) '-lifo Mllt.COItPT. lJ£PTNCIt $I#fF TOP t:J1I$£. ~ • ., r MIN. CQIIPr, IJ€PTH CL 11' A$C'HtL TIC CDNCItETE NDTE: tilMKl IIAS£ ct.AS$ 9'.aMY fIC R£«/III£lJ I"EMJIII6 .$04$ catDlT/OIIIIS. TYPICAL SSmON -S,E IBfJlIt. ST. H)RiL r, /Q' 1fESTf;IC~ POi.l!JT_ NI='- ~·C!t4P. LlfllNt; I?OC!. OFF'$CT L0CJt1NiG FRAt£ , C"'\.t.-R $() t;L'-"~~~311"d" G~ ------:::JaREJ~:~~i%:c~~~ .. f;l ~~<F9 lEX"""'.} ~. J. 'U",_.a~M z1' 1.3~ 1t·· j WJI!"'" wc~ l I. I 2:1( ~. ~I·" .COr<" ...... <YHU",fi, ! Lz ... ·MJIi CCM/>r, DCPT"HCR. SUlF8AS£CR:S£II/t-" ...ae .. ~&A. ... 1 uS! ROCKE~ye'l ~/1t-1iItIt. COIIIPr, DCPTHat stIfF TQIi' CR$E1tj--I r:J~ .. ~7£/ II II ~1:/F::'t~~ Z"'1tIN COWr, IVTWa.. V ASIHAl TIC CQIC toP ",,~ ... m AM) DlllECn r OIi!"R UIJlJ£Il. CLIMIJ.. 00." SPACC IS ClIAR OF RISER .IIID lIFTlN(; i't/it::t'JPfrc . HOOK Q.F"".,,~'c:~-;tI/"">l!; .'(iCW ~t' /WCI'C£ ItIOiIffO Q.~~~n~fJIT ~_. ~JFro£l'F""C~N"!Jr __ IZf' {~5"CADC Q.(" NIIC. """'" ~c",,,,,,,,,. __ 4Z"rt.· .~':"'G!1J! ORIV£WA r SECTION -TRACT :4' RESTRICTOR c.B. OWNER; _Xf':.-'dl,"'-r/l, .• !...- SHAG SINGH KH£LA 1609 SOUTH C£/tITR..t.L S!.JITE r' KENT. WA. dB(,;}:! FINAL CORRECTED PlAN DATE: 1-10-'{, -LEGAL DESCRIPTION: APPROV:%cll THA T PDIIr/Olf OF THE $.£ 4 SECTIDN J:( T'CnIIJISHIP nN.. RANGE oJ C. W,M IIIORJE PMT1CU.ARY 1J£SCIIfJIJEJ).u FOUOC TRACT )I' OF" 1(l11li CCt.N7'Y SHORT FLAT 1tIIOI4 AS ~ t.Ie£R ~AII..I06JDD~ BENCHMARK; N.E. T01' IItJL T OF" FIRE HrDIUNT ,AIN1'£D REf} « Mill! CORItCR s.£ InTH S'-4 1I()Rt. Cr. s.c. £L 4111.17 SCALE: 1«JRIz. . r • Itr SCALE: r4'" '. JWTe: ALL MEPU PAIT$'~AU3T11M_k~CtJrUosIt»I rE$ISTANTItfATE'JAU ottGM.~I£D. C~ptETE COI'~ I'IlrJTeulCN MtJY M A~Q Aa .. ~ PlfJtT.:S (E(CNIT,AL) $HA" NAil ~£4:=Z; ':rlf!J.~INEOItt=Jg"M[I'1i~ ~~~ :1 W::3?Idi1PI2INF B.A,L,O, Fils Nt>, 289-23 -"'_.d ~, PLA T OF BENSON WOODS "'-.. O.t., ~/_~ John 1Ft Nswsll Inc. IP.S. . ROADWA r 8 STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PLANS 231 Wlillalft' •• emae SO\llh, Renlon • .., •• hl •• 10ft •• OS5 ...... 255-2100 u_ _i,. Ice',o; ...,. "1$ s-.Qwrv H:U ~~L""ft Southeast from 111 Place SE toward corlstr'uclted at Constructed Wetland Area. Note water J ! I ~ J t I , A .. i • ~ ~ N BENSON WOODS CONSTRUCTED WETlAND POND) ~ .J ~ EXPECTED WETlAND OVERFLOW ROUTE .~--~ --\ gs~ ~* ~~ --< APPROXIMATE flOOD PLAIN LIMITS ELEV. = 479.0 479.76 479.22 \WLF 11 END SET REBAR & CAP PBH LS 11332 CHRISTIAN SHORT PLAT DETENTION \ \ \ \ 5 ~ ~ ~ Ol ZZ 00 !Z!; wZ 0::-~ili w" o::~ _ -479.9~ -; 'u~.OI ' GS \ GS ~ "-o 10 20 ,477.57 DP 1 477.59 WLF 6 / ~6 / ./ 'GS\ C) CO "f"' I I. I. POND f ,482F¥NCE o I m ~ I U w ~ rn w o o w !ii~ OZ z::l ",0 OlU -(!) wz (J)- .r>:: 1 H=20' "-"- "-"-"- ------------------- FOUND 4"X4" CONC. MONUMEN T 2" BRASS WITH PUNCH NOTE: PORTION OF BAIMA HOLMBERG TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY, APRIL 4, 2006 ABBREVIATIONS GS = GROUND SHOT WlF = WETlAND FLAG FNC = FENCE EG = EDGE OF GRAVEL DATUM: NAVO 88 , "- \ \ \ \ \ 480.45FT \ 480.79 D FNC 6 4'\' WOO '\ '\ '\ "-"- '\ FENCE, f).' " "-"-"-"-...... ...... \ 5'5:n J-:a.13 6 4 1 • 9.5 q, .' AP10 --..J " (Jl MAPLE 10 m , 479.49 e.G 'GS !!¥.-. , GSj [T] [T]~ I :::0 »MAPL z o " 479.71 ______ _ 478.44 'GS 6' WOOD FENr'F 6 --->t'78: IT FW 41ti.8, GS --- ' GS , 479.2f S GS 72 LE1O" 1 0" ,479.25 GS --- ~ 477.2/n FNC 6r.T! WD 478.46 , GS ,478.56 GS ,478.65 GS ~9.02" ~RYI3 -" , .94 ::.-GS GA TE I4BO.1l56 mm>~Tr--------- ./ / 480.72 / 'GS / /' ./ /' / /' 479.31 , GS 479.16 EGI / / I / / 3 t9 Z ~ U) 0:: • <0 ow ~ ~ _ w ~ d> ~ . " « z ~~~ 0::t9 "'i!)N >-Z Ua"'~ eD..W::l ig :J~~ ~~!l: -"" g~N Nlfif ~ I I I I I I SCALE: AS SHCJ::::I PROJECT NUMBER:: ~-cn SlEElNO. =NG FLOOD PLAIN BOUNDARY EXHIBIT ~ ~ DRAWING 8 00 Il?1lii;J DATE: JANUARY 1 ,2 8 ~ or 1 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ® BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. ________ _ DECLARA TION KNOW AU. MEN BY THESE PRES£NTS THAT WE THE UNDER- SIGNED O.,.,.ER(S) OF THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED 00 HEREBY WAKE It BOUNDARY UNE AD.AJSlWEHT THEREOf PURSUANT TO RCW 58.17.040 ,t,NO DEClARE THIS AO.lJSl\IENT TO BE THE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF THE SAME. AND n-IAT SAID ADJUSTMENT IS WADE WITH THE FREE CONSENT ANO IN AC- CORDANCE WITH TH[ DESIRES Of THE OWNER(S) 1\1 WI'PIESS WHEREOF WE HAVE SET OUR HANDS AND SEALS. " ,.,.,-, """\J EJMN [. EOOEBRECHT !WIDIIA t. E1iZii<W1/ STATE IT ) ,,, CCUoITY c:F ) I CER1F'r THAT I ~ 011 HAVE SA,11SFACTtlRY EWlDCt tW.T ga.a 'tHIS OECI.ARA'lDI AICI ~ 11 TO .: (lISjI£R) FREE NfIJ 'IOWNtAII'Y ACT fOIl THE USES NCO ~ IllENTICHED IN lWE MSTltUIIIENT. ~ruM""~C--------------- ~ :::fCY .... --------i'CTAAT Pt.8UC _______ __ ",. -;;;;;;;;;;-;;;;;;;;;-===== lIlY N'PCIN'NDIl tJCIIII£S STATE IT I ,,, COJNtr OF" ) , CEIITFY It\AT I KNOW 011 HAVE SA11SFAClORT tWIDCE THAT ::fD~~=:::~~~~)~ "'''''''''''. =lUftE==~~-~~~~~~~~~~~~ NOlAAT PU8UC ,F =~ ~CT _______ __ n,";;;~~~;;~===== In' APPOINlWENT UPlR£S STATE IT ) ,,, CCUny IT ) 1 a:RTFY lK,I.T I I(NiOW OIl HAVE 5A11SFACTtIR'I' [WIENC( ttlAT SIGIO tHIS D(C&.NtATION AND ACKNCI'M.EDGED IT 10 BE (HlSjI£R) FR£E ANtI 'IOWNTAR'Y o\CT FOR 1t€ USES AND PURPOSES toOmOJrIEI) IN Ttl[ 1NS1'ItUI!IDIT. ~lUftE, .. "~,---------------- =~ =t (F'-------""' .... "-"'" "'"-----lIlY N'f'OINlWENT tJCIIII£S RECORDER'S CERnFlCA TE ......•.•.••.....•.• IFlL£O rOR RECORD THIS . 0" y OF' .••• " .,. 20. AT ...... IN BOOK .... or ........ AT PAGt ...•••..• AT THE REQUESt or .. '. 'suFiYEy'oiFs" NAMf" ·······i,rAiiiAGER·· ""Sli~'cor''Rt~I)~'''''' APPROVAL APPROVAL NOTES; RECORDSNG NO. YO.../pArz OEPARTWENT or OEVELOPWENT AND EN'I1RONIoIIEHTAL SER'I1CES THIS REOUEST OUA1.JnES FOR EXEIoIPTION UNOER APPROVED THIS __ DAY OF 20 __ KCC 19A.2B. IT DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT THE DOES 6-t£F(P\ANO SURVE'I'OR, PLATl1NG LlMT PARCEl ~2~-0I20 " 81S2l4O-01J2 KING COl/tolTY DEPARTWENT or ASSESSW[HTS LOTS WIll. BE SUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT NOW OR IN THE FUTURE. THE LEGAl. TRANSFER Of THE PROPERTY MUST BE DONE BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT UNLESS ALL LOTS HEREIN ARE UNDER THE SAIoIE OWNERSHIP. SCALE: 1 DICH.. :110 n. .. .. EXAIoIINED 6: APPROVED THIS _ DAY OF ______ 20_ KING COUNTY ASStSSOA ,~:.",;">:~;:,,:,, .. , DEPUTY lONG COJNTY ASSESSOR omcE N IIl'InT W IO.DO' S lI!115'55· r '." ma: CMIIR IS 0..5'5 • o.fi OF NEW PIIOPEII1Y CQIKR. NEW PARCEL B"::' .,":' ISO.~ SJ. (1.16 Ie) \~ ::.. ,. NEW PARCEL A ...... ;,,::. '. 24,1)11.} s.F. (0.55 At) ~ .' ':'" "\ .,:''"'., ' EJ -.; 76 _ .: " FENX COIttO IS tJ'W -OF 10 PROI'ER1Y lINE \'~~:~~S.: .. ~:l~:l ;,'1': _"' EJE] .... ' -, ..... ----- ':.' .-1.1"---\ N n'la· W --_ __ -\ 10.00' .... / --__ ,II ' _ .....tole \ ul __ ,1 ... --,..410--' '-! "'"" --, , ,-\ POR11ON OF sw .1/4 Of ~1/4. s.~ T.~., R.~ .• W.IoI. ~ I",! 1 I ,:: -I / I' i ~ . \ ! ' / .,: I ... \ ' r' I , I / 'I r "'" n\a / ' _" I // -h~::!:·s;:~;' ..,. " I f iil: ',I ~ ,I / " ~\~ ~I \I~ . , , .' . ~~,~~;:;\.",". OlD I MAl DESCRIP!IO!!8i """"-00. LOT 1 r1F UIC C:CIIMTY SHORT PlAT IIJII8£R mSJDOlA It£CCIAOE!) UMtIOf DC CCUNTY ItECQADMI IrIIMIEII '~708012. 8£1»1 ,. PDIn10N rT -nu.cT 12. PNfllCII I.NC£ CAADDrI -nu.cts. ACCORDIC TO -...: PlAT tHERECf", RECQItDEI) ... \iICIUIIE • r1F P\.ATS, PACE ~ .. ICING CXJJNTY. WA~UIH . .......... 1"ME WEST HALF TRACT 13. PANTMEfI lAKE CIJIDDrI "mAClS.. ACCORDING TO tHE: PLAT THEItEOI' IIECORDEl) .. '«lI..lME I (IF PlAts. PAGE 25, II KING CQUNT't'. ............ txCEPT THE SUlTH 130 fEEl rT 1"ME WEST 1501.18 mT ........ TOG£THER -..TH AN tA5l!WENT ~ NGRESS AND [CRESS 0\IDt 11-£ lIBT 15 fEEl Cf" 1H[ EAST Ho\lF rT SAIl liIACT 13. NOTES, I. eouNDNtY IJIt( I<D.USNDlT CEJl11I'ICA"I[ ISSUtD IY PACI'IC NOR1HIIt5T mu: COIIPNfT or WASMtIGJCIIrI. JoIC.., 111\£ N:). H6IO-l. Do\tEO DECDIBDI 2V. 2001 "T 8:00 .... "' . 2. tt£ PURPOSE (IF 1tI5 II(UrI)MT I.M AD.IJSTll!NT IS TO AO.AtST TH[ COroIIIICIrI UNE 1tTII£EN PNICfl.5 'A' AND 'B' DU£ TO IIII'RO'IDIDIlS 3. NtW PAIIC£l 'I' IS Sl&£CT TO A flUGtT POCA ill UGHT CCIoFAN"f Q.£CllIIC "1ItAtISIrdSIOM AND/fJfIf DIS"lRllUfICN EASDIEJ(T PVt II£C. i'fO. 15OJCIIIDM2. AND MOl SHOII<I 1-£AtN. THE DESCRPlOI CCIrITAI£D lHtR[lN IS NSI.II'f"lCIEt(T TO ~ IT'S £lACT ""'"'''' •. IC£W PARCEL .,.. IS Sl&£CT m ,. STObl WA1[.II ""lO II I I I I I , , ~ ~~ <>" c:= I ""'" I I I Il£TDr(T\()Irj ACCtSS EASEIIOIT PEA Me. NO. 19!1101S24C101Dl, NOT ~ I€RDt. ~ IC£W PMCn ',.. IS Sl&£C1' ~TS. CCJC111DIS. JI£SlRICTIONS ANO EASDoIOf1S CONTAINED !III UIC COJNTY St-IORT PlAT mSOO4ll. VOL.. 102. PAGE 2l1li. RECOROS r1F KINO CCUNlY. WASttNOlCN- -------11, I I, 6' WOOD ro«:E~ J I I ':,.?" ~~~,~~~.,::,s:;:: ,:~. / II ~,-, aJNOO III ~ ro.... Ii "'" ID<._ W/f1115S [IS(; 0 C/L l1JJH WAY SE (.WI. OIJ) ~;; r __ ..... _J L.s-- I--t. lI£. W£ST 1/2. TR.ta 13, ~ L,tI([ <wIDEN WAClS """"""'" ""'"" PER RECORDIrIG NO. (53411113)_ N 118'50'36' W _ 154.28' .", 8 ".,-,c, ,- ..... ';.:-' • ..... ..... GAAIGE ~ ".., .. ":,'::"",-,,, 8 ..... , g I -, ~I \ -- I • :~~ I 0 [DRAfT -- • ,5.01)' !T . ,( "- \: )', ..... --, ........ 1->-""'" :~.;.....---- /1' -":,,;0'··:' C-lli· 1" ,:,\ \ ..• .::i.:,.·.·:::~::·~S,\ III J' --,. 'I -~ ~ ~8L E. 1M. I£ST 1/2. TJW:I u. E ~~I FWmO lNCE CARDEN mC1S .... NEW PARCEl. .,.. IS SUll.£CT TO A 51"1[ SEWACE AGIItEIoIDtT ANO nt[ 1[l1li$ AN] DJlC)lTIONS It£R[OF", PEA It[C. t«l. 15OI25OfIOl LEGEND ---WlDI"lII[ ---OlDTlI< -----".,.. """ lI< -----".,.. .....,. --f~ -00tn0LR ~ 01SlNl " 11000 FEN:[ • ~tN'~W~ (W) IDSUR£D ~ BE 112ND STREET .Jy 154.18' -"~"';;-;""""''''"'.;:",arss or I!£A!IrG Z&24.at (M) o I ~ ~ ..... ""'" "-2>-5 ~ I l486.or 'V 32; ____ FIll CAS[I) COIC. IB ./ \DO a T.IO( (.WI. 08) 5 • LAND SURVEYOR'S CERnFICA TE THIS BOUNDARY UNE AO..uSTMENT CORRECT1..Y REPRE- SENTS A SURVEY IoIADE BY ME OR UNDER IoIY DIRECTION IN CONF"ORIoIANCE WITH STATE AND COUNTY STAtUTES, IN .#'!N\-1~B.Y." 2007 . R~.\IID .~: .. f.'.f;f;SU;~ ............... . CERTlnCA TE NO. 40021 "-011EDR~ ~ .-."' ... Eggebrecht Boundory Line Adjustment OWN. BY om JOB NO. .. OI/10/O!l 242-597l-111l (01/01) CHI(O. BY "AlE 9<m " 1""]0" , CO' IlIlAIN FILE CO!?". [pJ [E ~ [~J \W [E ~ FEB 252008 K.C. D.D.E.S. FtEV~SiON IL(O)'?§(O)(())57 If you wish to receive a copy of the DDES report and decision of this application, complete and return this portion of the notice to the Land Use Services Division at the address listed above. File No. : L07S0057 ~~~~se print) S, \vi. Q t\ N Mailing Address: \ Z 9 i)..~ -\ \ , £L..Q . E ;) R I:. \'J '\0 N Telephone No. &/or e-mail address: _-,(",~4,....~:l.""S/7)L...S~",-":L=:(,,,--_·-=3,,-q.llJ! 1'--________ _ King County has received an application to develop property at the address listed above. You are receiving this notice because our records indicate ihat you own property w7'th'h approximately 500 feet of the proposal. . . MAIN FILE COpy Type2 NOA . · ,'- (\1 .. ~ (\1 Jj (:i1 ., .... IJ.l ·M ()1 Date of Mailing: October 12, 2007 ================================================== If you wish to receive a copy of the DOES report and decision of this application, complete and return this portion of the notice to the Land Use Services Division at the address listed above. File No. : L07S0057 , ~~~~se print) 'M U::: 5 11_ (1 flrR 1 5// A N Mailing Address: ~o 02 S E 79.2 ~ -/~()/,4 Telephone No. &/or e-mail address:.2,,53 -'f?.!;.l ~ "/,j 9 Y Was""'--.5 - King County has received an application to develop property at the address listed above. You are receiving this notice because our records indicate that you own property within approximately 500 feet of the Pjr posal. . PARTY OF Type2 NOA . _ RECO~C?_ MAIN FILE COpy • ~ LL' '" ~ " - .'\'~l\:\% . 07\"\ \~'-: < \ 'l\l~\ N \)\.,\'. . ,.'i -~ ~. (0 ~ ~S· -........ ".<' .. 0:0·' \ I~ G' -;j:t '(. ). ~ '0. ~ J) I.i.J 1', ..J 8: , \ ~ ~~ Cf\ \ - ('I' « f" ~ '" - W VI (;,;, ~ 'Co ~ - C .~ -b ~ ~ ~ ~ (\1 ~ ..... ('I Ul 1:11 ~ , <\j r'" ~ Ul ~ () \::) m ~ ill \ ~ J) ~ ~ ()-.. '0 "-!.Xl .\}. L07S0057036.Jpg L07S0057037 .jpg L07S0057 038.jpg L07S0057039 .jpg L07S0057040.jpg L07S0057041 .Jpg L07S0057 042 .jpg L07S0057 043 .jpg L07S0057 044.jpg L07S0057045 .jpg L07S0057046.jpg L07S0057 047 .jpg L07S0057 048 .jpg L07S0057049.jpg L07S0057 050.jpg L07S0057051 .jpg L07S0057052.jpg L07S0057 053.jpg L07S0057 054,jpg L07S0057 055 .jpg L07S0057056.jpg L07S0057 057 .jpg L07S0057 058.jpg L07S0057 059 ,jpg L07S0057060.jpg L07S0057061 .jpg L07S0057062.jpg L07S0057 063,jpg L07S0057064.Jpg L07S0057065.jpg I ... .1,\ y,..,...~ .~ . ... .' iIV. '\'\.~ . I _ i.' L07S0057066.jpg L07S0057067.jpg L07S0057 068.jpg L07S0057 069.jpg L07S0057070.jpg L07S0057071 .jpg L07S0057 072 .jpg L07S0057073.jpg r ,--_ .. _------ · - February 22, 2008 PYRAMID ENGINEERING LLC Ms. Shannon Dorr, Prograrn/Project Manager Land Use Services Division King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services ~ ~ ~ Ii', iJ!/ lE [Ql FEB 'L 5 Z008 K.C. D.D.E.S. ::~~':'~;;1~ IREV~S~ONI RE: Truvest Short Plat -Application No. L07S0057 . Additional Information LlIdAUL\'IlFllE COpy Dear Ms. Dorr: In response to the County's letter of November 21, 2007, we hereby transmit the following information: o Plat Screening Transmittal (I copy) o 100-Y ear Flood Plain Delineation Report (3 copies) o Lot Potential Study Report (10 copies) o Letter of Intent (3 copies) o Walkway Inventory Study Report (JO copies) o Copy ofBLA submitted (2 copies) o Revised Preliminary Plat Map set (JO copies) A discussion of each of the identified issues follows below. Recreation Space In accordance with KCC 21 A.14.180 E2, a 47' by 70' sport court with a 20-foot diameter tot play toy have been shown on a Conceptual Recreation Plan which is added to the Preliminary Plat Map drawings (Sheet 4 of 4). This provides over 3,600 square feet of recreation area, or 400 SF per lot. This exceeds the 390 SF of recreation space per lot that is required. In addition, a picnic table and benches have been shown for parents and observers to enjoy. Drainage In accordance with KCSWDM Section 1.3.2 and 4.4.2 a Flood Plain Determination Report has been prepared. The limits of the floodplain have been shown on the Preliminary Plat map. No adjustment of the plat design was required. Roads The proposed road, curbs, and sidewalks have been shown on a new sheet within the Preliminary Plat maps. Sheet 3 of 4 shows the paving proposed for the roads with typical road sections for particular areas. This includes a full width right of way north of the SW comer of Parcel 6623400136 and half street improvements south of SW comer of Parcel 2008-02·22 Xmttl to SOorr re Addtl Info Page I of3 29015 Military Ad S., PMB #544, Federal Way, WA 98003 0 (253) 852-1164 0 Fax (253) 859-2065 6623400136. The stem portion of the road will have vertical curb and gutters where they are shown, and rolled curbs within the culdesac area. Private Street versus Public Street The Plat Screening Transmittal requested a discussion regarding the proposed easement for the private roadway. A Lot Potential Study has been prepared and is attached to this letter that demonstrates no more than 16 lots will use the roadway in the near term. Letter of Intent to Allow Construction at Road Intersection A Letter of Intent to provide an easement at the northwest quadrant of the intersection of the proposed road with SE 192nd Street for construction of the required curb return is attached. Because only a half-street construction is proposed for this project, the curb return at the northeast quadrant of this intersection is not proposed for construction and therefore a Letter of Intent for that area has not been secured. At this time, full width construction is not necessary at the south end of the road due to the number oflots (see above). Should the adjacent parcels submit for subdivision development in the future, the easterly half of the street would be built as part ofthat project which would include right of way dedications and curb return construction. Missing Utility Pole The identified utility pole has been located and has been added to the Preliminary Plat Maps. Actually, two utility poles were identified. Both have been added to the plans. Walkways A Walkway Inventory Study has been prepared as is attached with this letter. Wetlands No adjustments to the wetlands boundary or buffer were requested. Survey In the Plat Screening Transmittal there was a request by Survey, Mr. Ray Florent, to provide documentation regarding how and when one easement over the west IS-feet of the east half of Tract 13 was established. A Real Estate Contract dated October 2,1961 conveying the West Y:z of Tract 13 to Ashland references an easement as described for the benefit of Tract 1 to the north. Asked if this was sufficient information, Mr. Pat Simmons of King County acknowledged the existence of the easement, but asked for more information, stating in an email, "The owner of the short plat can improve access in the easement area on his land (the east 15 feet), however Tract 13 of Panther Lake Gardens is not stated a beneficiary of this easement therefore would have no stated use of the easement area." Subsequent to his request, various searches found the following; o July 1, 1897 Panther Lake Garden Tracts subdivision 2008-02-22 Xmttl to SOon-re Addtllnfo Page 2 of3 o June 16, 1954 Statutory Warranty Deed, party Hanson conveying to party Eggebrecht. o October 2, 1961 Real Estate Contract, party Hanson conveying to party Ashland o December 10, 1964 Statutory Warranty Deed, Party Reeves to party Vacca o March 6, 1973 Title Report for Vardeman o January 25, 1977 Statutory Warranty Deed, party Collelo conveys to Gill Tract I plus north Y, of Tract 2 o April 25, 1977 Quit Claim Deed, Christian (nee Gill) conveys Y, interest to Christian (husband) o March 31, 1981 Garden View Estates Subdivision by Christian o April II, 1983, Quit Claim Deed, party McIntire (wife) to party McIntire (husband) . o February 10,1997, Christian Short Plat o March 6, 2006, Slaughter Short Plat o April 4, 2006 Deed of Trust This information is attached and provided as a summary of the land actions since the original land subdivision over a hundred years ago. There is no definitive easement document that clearly determines the access rights of each of the parties currently accessing the gravel drive. However, the east and west "easements" are clearly described in the Real Estate Contract dated October 2, 1961 and also confirmed in the March 6, 1973 title report. In addition to this document and the descriptions, it seems that by general acceptance of and use by each land holder that the gravel road is and has been available for their benefical use, that it is understood that an easement exists whether or not an actual easement document exists. Finally, a copy of the Boundary Line Adjustment that has been prepared and will be submitted very shortly has been attached for reference. We hope this satisfies all the issues described in the Plat Screening Transmittal. Please contact us if you have any questions or need additional information. Thank you. Sincerely, PYRAMID ENGINEERING, LLC ~~~ Project Civil Engineer Attachments as noted above. CC: Shelly Ford and Gary Watts, Truvest, LLC, P.O. Box 1754, Renton, WA 98057 2008-02-22 Xmttl to SDoIT re Addtllnfo Page 3 of3 tQ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.kingcounty.gov January 18, 2008 Peter Gonzales, P.E. Pyramid Engineering, LLC 29015 Military Rd. S., PMB # 544 Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Application for the Truvest Preliminary Short Plat DOES File Nos. L07S0057 Dear Mr. Gonzales: Thank you for your January 18, 2008, letter requesting an extension of the deadline for submittal of the additional information required to process the preliminary short plat application referenced above. The request for additional information stops all processing of the short plat application until the required information is received. The time spent waiting for information to be submitted is not counted toward any time limit requirements of the short plat application process. The previous letter established a deadline of January 22, 2008. We are granting an extension to this deadline. If the Land Use Services Division of DOES does not receive the necessary information requested to process your application by March 24, 2008, your application will be canceled or denied. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at 206-296-6673. Si"~ Shannon Dorr Project/Program Manager II Current Planning Section Cc: Shelly Ford/Gary Watts, Applicant Trishah Bull, PPM III, Current Planning Section, LUSD Mark Follmer, Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Nick Gillen, Critical Areas Section, LUSD L Application File / I. August 6, 2008 Ms. Shannon Dorr Program/Project Manager Current Planning Section PYRAMID ,_ ENGI N E ERI N\?1\C;; 'i'~ P ~ -:) ~ \r\\'U L LC IS ~} l'o~--,J \S! AUG 0720011 K.C, D.D.E.S. JL @ ~ S © Q)) 5 rif Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 980S7-S212 RE: Application No. L07S00S7 -Truvest Short Plat SI16/08 Request for Additional Information or Studies Dear Shannon; The project applicant requests a two-month extension for submitting the requested information outlined in your SI16/08 letter regarding the above project. The subject letter requested a Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) for a portion of the site be completed and recorded. However, as noted in the letter, this area is now within the jurisdiction of the City of Renton and the BLA must be completed via their process. We submitted the application package last month to the City of Renton. Two days ago, the applicant received notification from the City that, "The application was determined to be complete and a letter to that effect was sent to you on August I, 2008. There is a two week comment period during which Fire, Plan Review, and Property Services staff review the proposal. After those comments are completed you will be notified if any revisions are necessary." Clearly, the City's review will take us beyond the deadline of Friday, August IS, 2008. Moreover, we are uncertain what revisions might be required and/or the time necessary to address their review comments. For this reason we request a 60-day extension of the deadline for submittal of additional information and written acknowledgement of same. If you have any questions or need additional information, please let me know immediately. Thanks for your help. Sincerely, PYRAMID ENGINEERING, LLC p,~,9.?- Project Civil Engineer CC: Gary Watts, Truvest, LLC Dave Peebler, PLS, Parametrix 29015 Military Rd s,. PMB #544, Federal Way, WA 98003 • (253) 852-1164 • Fax (253) 859·2065 I Dorr. Shannon From: Dorr, Shannon Sent: To: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 2:23 PM 'Pete Gonzales' Subject: Truvest SP L07S0057 -extension Pete - I have reviewed your request for an extension to the August 15, 2008 deadline to submit requested information for the subject application. Please accept this email as confirmation that the deadline has been extended. The new deadline is OctobeX..15., 2Q_Q12. Your application "'ill remain on "hold" from today's date, until the date you are advised that the additional information satisfies this request, or 14 days after the date the information has been provided. Feel free to eontaet me if you have any questions. -Shannon Shannon Dorr, Project/Program Manager II King County Land Use Services Division Dept. of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 shannon.dorr@kingcounty.gov P -(206) 296-6673 F -(206) 296-7051 1 " tQ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov May 16, 2008 Shelly Ford Truvest, LLC P.O. Box 1754 Renton, WA 98057 RE: Notice of Request for Additional Information or Studies Application No. L07S0057-Truvest Short Plat Dear Ms. Ford: MAIN FILE COpy The purpose of this letter is to notify you p~rsuant to King County Code Title 20 that the Land Use Services Division is requesting additional information and/or studies to complete the review of your project. The information is described on the enclosed plat screening transmittal. When submitting the requested information, include a copy of the plat screening transmittal and retain a copy for your records. Provide a cover letter, which lists how each item, was addressed. Any clarification or explanation of the submittal can also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATTN.: Shannon Dorr, Project Manager II, Current Planning Section 900 Oaksdale Avenue Southwest . Renton, WA 98057-5212 If the submittal is hand delivered, submit at the address above. Your application is.on "hold" from the date of this notice, until the date you are advised that the additional information satisfies this request or 14 days after the date the information has been' provided. You will be notified if the Division determines that the information is insufficient. Please note that the supplemental information required after vesting of a complete application shall not affect the validity of such application. ·,The deadline for the submittal of the necessary information is August 15, 2008. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist, which may justify an extension of this date, you may submit such request, in writing, for consideration by this Department. Failure to meet the deadline shall be cause for the Department to cancel or deny the application. If possible, please submit all of the information in one package. If you have any questions, regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-6673. Sh nnon Dorr Program/Project Manager Current Planning Section . CC: Mark Follmer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Nick Gillen, Critical Areas Section, LUSD Trishah Bull, Current Planning Sections, LUSD File L07S0057 -Truvest SP May 16, 2008 Screening cover letter (3) Page 2 of 2 . -': ,-"'1 ":'.~~;", ,r I,' .. j 'i?::'~,. '.'-':;,.,', :~::;,._ ' .W King County F;1latScreening 'Tr,ansMi#I!':::' : . :i:' . Preliminary Plat Applicatior -TruvesfSh0.riPlat Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www,metrokc.gov . £ Boundary Line Adjustment (BlA) LUSDi,File No .. L:0~S0057 '. '. . .. Cate orhiformatiori~eqi.ie.st: May 16;2008 Qeadlinefor Submittal of Information: Al:Igi.ist 15, 2008 . b7 + .. 1. The preliminary short plat map indicates a proposed BlA along the western property line. The property was recently annexed into the city of Renton. The applicant must submit an approved BlA from the city of Renton prior to preliminary short plat approval. As a result of the review of the information, additional information (studies, revisions, etc.) may be requested at a later date. Further evaluation of these issues may result in the reconfiguration and/or loss of lots. Truvest SP -LD7S0057 May 16, 2008 Screening Letter (3) Page 1 of 1 PYRAMID ENGINEERING LLC October 3, 2008 ~~~~~'\ff~[Q) OCT 082008 Ms. Shannon Dorr Program/Project Manager Current Planning Section Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98057-5212 RE: Application No. L07S0057 -Truvest Short Plat 5/16/08 Request for Additional Information or Studies Dear Shannon; K.C. D.D.E.S. The project applicant requests another two-month extension for submitting the requested information outlined in your 5/16/08 letter regarding the above project. The subject letter requested a Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) for a portion of the site be completed and recorded. However, as noted in the letter, this area is now within the jurisdiction of the City of Renton and the BLA must be completed via their process. We submitted the BLA application package several months ago to the City of Renton. Unfortunately, we have still not secured the final, recorded BLA which can be provided to you. Our current deadline for submitting this final piece of information for the project was to be October 15. At this point we do not see yet that the City will be able provide that recorded document by the current deadline. As mentioned in our prior request for extension, we are uncertain what revisions might be required and/or the time necessary to address their review comments. For this reason we request a 60-day extension of the deadline for submittal of additional information and written acknowledgement of same. If you have any questions or need additional information, please let me know immediately. Thanks for your help. Sincerely, PYRAMID ENGINEERING, LLC p~I:.2?t-- Project Civil Engineer CC: Gary Watts, Truvest, LLC Dave Peebler, PLS, Parametrix 29015 Military Rd S., PMB #544, Federal Way, WA 98003 0 (253) 852·1164 • Fax (253) 859-2065 January 18, 2008 Ms. Shannon Dorr Program/Project Manager Current Planning Section PYRAMID ENGINEERING LLC Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98057-5212 RE: Application No. L07S0057 -Truvest Short Plat 11/21/07 Request for Additional Information or Studies Dear Shannon; KC.D.D.E.S. The project applicant requests a one-month extension for submitting the requested information outlined in your 11121/07 letter regarding the above project. While nearly all of the data requested has been assembled andlor prepared, we are still trying to resolve legal issues with respect to the access easements on the project to the satisfaction of King County's survey group. At issue is the date of the instruments establishing the easements and the rights bestowed and upon whom. We hope to have all the information available very shortly, but we will not be ready by the deadline of Tuesday, January 22,2008. For this reason we request an extension of the deadline and written acknowledgement of same. If you have any questions or need additional information, please let me know immediately. Thanks for your help. Sincerely, PYRAMID ENGINEERING, LLC &1] Peter Gonzales, P.E Project Civil Engineer CC: Gary Watts, Truvest, LLC 29015 Military Rd S., PMB #544, Federal Way. WA 98003 • (253) 852·1164 • Fax (253) 859·2065 " ~ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.kingcounty.gov February 26, 2009 Peter Gonzales, P.E. Pyramid Engineering, LLC 29015 Military Rd. S., PMB # 544 Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Application for the Truvest Preliminary Short Plat DDES File No. L07S0057 Dear Mr. Gonzales: From the supporting documents provided, it has come to our attention that the ownership of the easement to be used for access to the short plat is unclear. The March 1964 deed to Eggbrecht does not list this easement as included in the deed. The October 1961 real estate contract lists a IS-foot easement along the east boundary line of Tax Lots 129 (Vardemans), 132 (Eggbrecht) and along the panhandle portion of Tax Lot 134 for the benefit of the parcel directly north of the subject site where it now occupies Lot 4 of King County short plat L94S0042. The 1977 deed to this parcel (Gill) lists the easement as "together with" this parcel. There is no record that the easement part of 1981 subdivision of Gill's parcel or that the Eggbrecht parcel conveyed an easement right and neither is there a record of a conveyance ofthis easement right when the parcel was short subdivided again in 1994. Since the March 1964 deed did not include the "together with" to add the easement right, (when Eggbrecht acquired the parcel), this easement right must be conveyed by a document signed by the owners of the adjacent properties and be added to the property rights of the subject parcel. The title report provided for subject site states that" this land together with an easement for ingress and egress over the west 15 feet ofthe east half of tract 13." There is no record to show if and when the easement rights were forfeited and conveyed to the subject site. At this point based on the available legal documents, the beneficiary of the IS-foot easement along the east boundary of Tax Lots 129 and 132 and the IS-foot easement along the boundary of Tax Lot 134 appears to be the parcel to the north. The applicant through further title search must show when this easement became part of the site's legal description or provide the following: 1. A letter of intent from the property owners of Tax Lots 129 and 134 for use and construction of an access road to be used by additional lots through this short plat, or .' 2. Alternatively, the proposed road may be shifted to the west. For this a letter of intent to allow for a 30-foot easement for construction of a road along the east boundary of Lot 129 must be provided. Please submit the requested information by March 31, 2009. If you have any questions regarding the legal document and title search, please call Pat Simmons at (206) 296-6636. For any questions regarding processing of this short plat, please contact me at 206-296-7173. Sincerely, 7~ 'I~\49--t.· Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Current Planning Section Cc: Shelly Ford/Gary Watts, Applicant Trishah Bull, PPM III, Current Planning Section, LUSD Brian Norton, Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Pat Simmons, Engineer, Engineering Review Section Nick Gillen, Critical Areas Section, LUSD Application File March 24, 2009 Fereshteh Dehkordl, Project Manager Current Planning Section King County Department of Development 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 Re: Application for Truvest Preliminary Short Plat DOES File No. L07S0057 Dear Ms. Dehkordl, I am in receipt of your letter dated February 26, 2009 regarding the easement to be used for access to the proposed short plat. First of all, let me express my surprise and disappointment that this issue is being raised again. Your office sent us a letter dated November 21, 2007 requesting additional information, which included a request for documentation regarding the easement. We spent the ensuing months collecting the information you requested, including the easement documentation. On February 22, 2008, we sent the information requested. Subsequent requests from your office were made on March 21 and May 16, 2008, but none of the requests pertained to the easement. We were under the assumption that the only condition left to meet is the BLA approval of the City of Renton, which has been satisfied. We made the reasonable assumption that the easement issue had been satisfied. Now, after a lapse of approximately 12 months, you are telling us that this easement is In question. You can imagine our frustration with the County's diSjointed and untimely process. As you have pOinted out in your letter of February 26, there is clearly an easement over the 15' area we intend to use as access as evidenced in deeds prior to the Eggebrecht acquisition. Old Republic Title provided us with the Eggebrecht parcel legal description that includes this easement. While we disagree additional information is necessary due to the clear indication of the easement, Old Republic is in the process of conducting additional title research in order to support the legal description that they provided to us. However this will take time. • We are requesting an extension of 60 days, until May 31, 2009, in order to satisfy your request. Please confirm as soon as possible that this extension can be granted. Thank you. Sincerely, l~ifIb Gary Watts Truvest, LLC 425·226·5825 Cc: Pete Gonzales Pat Simmons Trlsha Bull .. t;i King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave·nue Southwest Renton, VVA ·98057-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www.klngcounty.gov February 26, .2009 Peter Gonzales, P .E. Pyramid Engineering, LLC 29015 Military Rd. S., PMB # 544 Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Application for the Truvest PreliminarvShort Plat DOES File No. L07S0057 Dear Mr. Gonzales: From the supporting documents provided, it has come to our attention that the ownership of the easement to be used for access to the short plat is unclear. The March 1964 deed to Eggbrecht does not list this easement as incJudedin the deed. The October 1961 real estate contract lists a 15-foot easement along the east boundary line of Tax Lots 129 01 ardemans), 132 (Eggbrecht) and along the panhandle portion of Tax Lot 134 for the benefit of the parcel directly north of the subject site where it now occupies Lot 4 of King County short plat L94S0042. The 1977 deed to this parcel (Gill) lists the easement as ''together with" this parcel. There is no record that the . easement part of 1981 subdivision of Gill's parcel or that the Eggbrecht parcel conveyed an easement right and neither is there a record of a conveyance of this easement right when the parcel was short subdivided again in 1994. Since the March 1964 deed did not include the "together with" to add the easement right, (When Eggbrecht acquired the parcel), this easement right must be conveyed by a document signed by the owners of the adjacent properties and be added to the property rights of the subject parcel. The title report provided for subject site states that" this land together with an easement for ingress and egress over the west 15 feet of the east half of tract 13." There is no record to show if and when the easement rights were forfeited and conveyed to the subject site. At this point based on the available legal documents, the beneficiary of the 15-foot easement along the east boundary of Tax Lots 129 and 132 and the IS-foot easement along the boundary ofTax Lot 134 appears to be the parcel to the north. The applicant through further title search must show when this easement became part of the site's legal description or provide the following: 1. A letter of intent from the property owners of Tax Lots 129 and 134 for use and . construction of art access road to be used by additional lots through this short plat, or .. -2. Alternatively, the proposed road may be shifted to the west. For this a letter of intent to allow for a 30-foot easement for construction of a road along the east boundary of Lot 129 must be provided. Please slibmit the requested infonnation by March 31, 2009. If you have any questions regarding the legal document and title search, please call Pat Simmons at (206) 296-6636. For any. questions regarding processing of this short plat, please contact me at 206-296-7173 . . Sincerely, [~?~\49-t.· Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Current Planning Section Cc: · .. $Ji.e)lYF~rd!Gary.wlltts; AWlican,t ..... " .' ; Trishah Bull, PPM ill, CurreJl.t Planning Section, LUSD Brian Norton, Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Pat Simmons, Engineer, Engineering Review Section Nick Gillen, Critical Areas Section, LUSD . Application File Moe. Judi From: Dorr, Shannon Sent: To: . Friday, September 14, 2007 2:48 PM Moe, Judi Subject: FW: L07S0057 Truvest Eggebrecht SP Incomplete Level 1 Drainage Analysis Judi - Will you please put a copy of the following email from Mark in the official record file (L07S0057 TruvestjEggebrecht SP). Thanks! Shannon Dorr Program/Project Manager II King County DDES':" Current Planning 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98057-5212 Shannon.Dorr@kingcounty.gov From: Sent: To: Cc: Follmer, Mark Thursday, August 23, 2007 2:41 PM Dorr, Shannon; Buil, Trishah Cheshier, Beth Subject: L07S005~ Truvest Eggebrecht SP Incomplete Levell Drainage Analysis Shannon and Trishah, I have reviewed available documentation submitted for this application for completeness and have determined that the Level 1 Downstream Analysis is incomplete according to the submittal requirements described in the Drainage Manual. Please provide the following additional information for the Level 1 Downstream Analysis and resubmit. It is not necessary to reproduce the entire Level 1 Downstream Analysis. o Show drainage complaint locations on the drainage system map. Label the mapped locations with the drainage complaint numbers. Mark Follmer, P.E. Engineering Review Section King County DOES Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 2062967039 Mark.Follmer@KingCounty.gov 1 ~ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.kingcounty.gov June 2, 2009 Gary Watts Truvest LLC PO Box 1754 Renton, WA 98057 RE: L07S0057 -Request for Extension Dear Mr. Watts: Thank you for your letter dated May 27,2009 letter requesting an extension to the deadline for submittal of the additional information required to process the above referenced preliminary short plat application. As you are aware, the request for additional information stops all processing of the short plat application until the required information is received. The time spent waiting for information to be submitted is not counted toward any time limit requirements of the short plat application process. The previous letter established a deadline of June 1, 2009. After review of your file, we decided to grant you the 60-day extension you requested. If the Land Use Services Division of DOES does not receive the necessary information requested to process your application by August 2, 2009, your application will be canceled or denied. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (206) 296-7136 or angel ica. velasguez@kingcounty.gov. Sincerely, / ~~¥:&: ~ Angelica Velasquez, Project Manager Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division cc: Ervin Eggebrecht, 11044 SE 192nd St, Renton, WA 98055 Lanny Henoch, PPM III, Current Planning Section, LUSD Applic9tion File ;, , tQ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www.kingcounty.gov March 26, 2009 Gary Watts Truvest LLC PO Box 1754 Renton, W A 98057 RE: Application for the Truvest Preliminary Short Plat DDES File Nos. L07S0057 Dear Mr. Watts: Thank you for your March 24, 2009 letter requesting an extension of the deadline for submittal of the additional information required to process the preliminary short plat application referenced above. This file was assigned to me for completion in early February 2009 and that is when I noticed that supporting documents are needed to confirm legal access to the new lots. Therefore I made an attempt to bring it to your attention as soon as possible. We regret that the easement issue regarding this project was not fully addressed earlier. However, it is important that this issue be resolved prior to the preliminary approval of this short subdivision, thus preventing delay during the final review and recording of the lots. I am granting an extension of the deadline of March 31, 2009. Please submit the easement documents described in our February 26, 2009 letter by Juue 1, 2009. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, 1:;..4-I .:;l' ~'-Q~~ Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Current Planning Section Cc: Shelly Ford/Gary Watts, Applicant· Trishah Bull, PPM III, Current Planning Section, LUSD Lanny Henoch, PPMII, Current Planning Section, LUSD Pat Simmons, Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Application File . :" .. " ' •.•. ~~:.~ .•. : ~'" dQJ A m h ....., (0) ITt CD !=' N m !=' c.n m r-.:;, = 0 ::> ~ ::> ::.0 m lc::J1 ..... _--._ ...... :ANTHCf\ Uf\L 'CAf\DEN "''1." 8 ' •. l'\ 7 Ii' I<. " ~ 6 , • ." ''', ',. .s JL@~§(O)@57 • .. ", .... .. JI JJ REV~S~ONJ " ~ -Z- -'-. " > fill Cuunll{ 7"rfl.s 611" f. 11,,'1. I'llf/Pt/..,.J,-""'11' ".$G"'~ h .. , utl'!"h'n. v~(y /i! /~J.J -.. ~. -, BrRtlK PH~LP.1 Ch/"t.."" 7,,,,.1. h7. ........ -.~ ......... . 1.58676 'i"-» 38 .< i' • 6INNru lFao..e C::~fFJl1 H~.v~.sT c/ n...T. ;UH6/f Jt.lLr Ie 18$7 AT .'fJ .,' a: w '" :E :J Z W ..J -u.. w o o u o w '"' '" King County Departrqent ofDeveiopment and En~onmental Services 900 O:t.kewnle A\'enue Soutbwest Renton, \\'A 98055-1219 MEMORANDUM FROM: Site InvestigatorB Em CHESH 1 ER TO: Engineer .t16i2.1( FOLLM EQ (OS Ool<.) RE: Field Check Observations I Address/Location IIOLJY Se: 192"'0 S, Related Project # / Name _______ _ Date ex:: .. :! 15, 2rol FI8..D O::T II, 2.C07 Thomas Map Page (new)-,"0,-8(p~",----__ _ Thomas Guide Page (old) _______ _ 2. SYNOPSIS Of PROPOSAL SH0\2TPLA, I,qy ACLZES* OF R-2, 1~1V q Lars WATER QuAL! TY BASIL L/-\ DA' S FLo",' CoNTJ?oL w 30 SIERRA FILE INFORMATION '" :E Parcel #(s) (0(023 yoo I 3"Z... / ::l Z Kroll Map CooL-1 Acres / Feet' I . ct Y A S-T-R 2£. 32.·23·05 Current Zoning_......,R~----'-B"-___ _ .... ~ Community Plan ~seos"""""""''''''''lCJ2""""=.E"'EK,,,,-,,~~ _______ . __________ _ ~ o 0: 0.. Comprehensive Plan --'U"'VY'I'-'-, _____ _ Limited Text Entry _________________________ _ PAGE I 4. SENSITIVE AREAS INFORMATION MAP FOLIO PAGE# SITECONTAINS SITE ABUTS YES NO YES NO COMMENTS • Wetlands ___ -'-ITJ 0 Wetland # Wetland Class ____ Drainage Basin Sub Basin BLACK.. i21'-1Ei2.. Critical Basin? III [[) • Streams _____ 0 IZI 0 IZI Stream Class Stream Name • IOO-year Floodplain _0 0_-0 0 • Erosion Hazard __ 0 0._0 0 • Landslide Hazard_O Gl_O 0 • Seismic Hazard ___ 0 0 __ 0 121 • Coal Mine Hazard_O 0. __ 0 0 • Other known SA's _0 0_0 0 Class I or 2 Stream or Class I Wetland within one mile downstream of project site? --IY.J,E~S...L __ _ FA NW EX:<-Cf2.££}G. FEMA FIRM number _~ ______________ In FEMA Floodplain? III ®. Soils Mapped· , Map # ~ Best available Topographical Map .JE:;:;-:r"-!I_S:L...J.L",-luQ,,,,-AlQ.l:s..~_,--____________ _ So SITE DESCRIPTION MATCHES T.I.R. DESCRIPTION 1 Il-I E: !2 ECJ7\)':,J Eo u l..A:1<.. 'Sl±Ai?ED \. Cj Y AC!2E SI IE H-A S AN E)(\STl tUG tiaJsE ow mE: $Q,nl-eJ2.r-..) 1M POl?noW; SMALL -nza.s A-iZ..1:::-kLONcS ]}±~ WEsT 13J)6£" I A lJw(-2ffi. H e:ob E IS A1..r:N 6, nt £: erST '~6 E. 11+ G:. EQ\ 5r BDb E I ~ A2-0!J[ OF TIlE t\V.J$E IS CJ.)I2-B/6VTIFJ2 1-S lOBNALl? WS eDZgA Noi2,n-t Qf mE. tigJ5£ IS Aew:::> 61?AS5eS IV rn-l <fD ~ t1kPPro u.J.::1) AlLJO JUST U,Je.TI1 OF WE SIn;;. THIS Age MS B~ Cu~?seso olZ\blUltL \.A..1:;nMO QkUNI®c..¥.l U)A<, DOtvC fQg, ts;QIN:Q,j[SP (SoHE ~I~ · SINe..£" \ 990 I /rOOITHJ"t0 l\L $1 NeE \Cfj(P) . PA GE 2 6. EXISTING SITE FEATURES Un';apped Sensitive Areas: 'YQ5$llSLC l'IOOlTZ>WA;LL11 .gTL/I"ND,S / Bu ff'EP . ) Soils types seen and evidence of soil movement, slides, slumps, erosion, or deposition: ______ _ SlIt &c!t?l::'( t...e1)12L -\2.E43JC 6Ll. Ground Cover: 6"i2A$6, 1)2.eJ;;3. IZuS!-\ , } Existing Utilities (hydrants, signs, poles, etc.) shown on site plan?--lh"'IO""--__________ _ Wildlife and habitats: _LC..IA::::u.T _______________________ _ Water Wells: NatE ~ Work started on site? ----'-/0:::.>..0"'-______________________ _ Closed depression >5000 feet'? [!) PlI Steep slopes? [!) ~' ___________ _ 7.· DR A'I NAG E Drainage complaint records S!?£ A1J7'sr t!1:3::J 61 S Proposal will add >5000ft' of new impervious surface? [j] I!!l Approximate Area ______ _ Proposal will collect and concentrate surface and storm water runoff from an upland and site drainage area of over 5000 ft'? [j] I!!l Approximate Area ______ _ Upland Draina~e Basin (draining directly onto site): Ae.-eA.S 'J1) WOen+/:E2'ssT 'I)MJ bl 771.uItg,DS 51Th On-site Drainage: SI n;: IS P/bJ2...IX £kAT SLCPI Wh SU hl±TkY TV 5oJQ-I Downstream Drainage (minimum 114 mile distance): oS lIT Di2k1I0S TI) CBjPI pI; 'S'1'STe}-1 tru;ub NC!2-UI SIDE OE SE Iq2nd sr I\}.JO Drainage Description Matches T,I.R.? _.l'0LE~~!....... _________________ _ PAGE 3 B. EXISTING ROAD NETWORK On~site Roads 6f2A\18-'i2DtsD l;fP/s!2:Tl5k U£B/6lfTff](2/~OeuJA:t.,K kLQUq lD6i Sloe -~aJT ? Adjacent Roads -'B2IUtsj""£ i2ctsQ/t2sst;1Y0..;n= CD~ w S E I g 'Z ",d ST. Lue.~ '8Jfl...., '1--' \.J /JD81Z 12£ 0tV 1 tJb/ VI kJ2l)....1 10 tq Closest Transit Stop __ ---'--________ ---,-______________ _ B. ESTIMATE OF PR.OJECT IMPACTS ON SOIL AND WATER 9. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS PA G E 4 ATTACHMENT TO MEMORANDUM PROJECT NUMBER: FIELD/OFFICE SKETCH WORK: Drainage systems, features, channels within the upland site plan areas, on the development site, and in the downstream receiving areas: SKETCHED BY: S CAL E Notes: ________________________________________________________ ___ I" = ---o PAGE. 6 ~OJECT: iL07S0057 Status: IPENDING Date: Location: \11044 SE 192ND ST APPLICANT: ITRUVEST LLC·SHELLY FORD Status: U@Jlo@Cil .~ Plat Name: IEGGBRECHT SHORT PLAT Parcel N o:I~.&~:40:..0J~2};;~E.i;i~::.e;!!:!~ Location: 111044 SE 192ND ST City I Zip: jRE"H~ONWA 90055 ... o wner:I~@J.!l,8E,G.l;:liI:'EB¥!~Er;:~~::::··';.··,}:}·.'J .. ·;."·."11 Applicant: liT,f:1Wy,'ESitl1.~C:SH.EI;~~"EG.8Q;,:jC];2:,:0.:::":::::":;";':'] \-' Planner.ISDOR Rev. Engr.:IMFOL Occupancy:lr----- Thursday, Oct 11, 2007 12;53 PM e.ckJltop r % Complete: M.9l.:":E3 No.of Lots: 19 App5ed: 108120/2007 Deemed Complete:109I28/2007 Vested: 108/2012~07 SEPA [YIN~IN SEPA TO:I L'_I_ Open Hearing: L'_I_ .. Decision:L/_I_ Expires:L/_I_ Recorded:L/_I_ Complete: Ll_'_ Last Status Change: I~~~f~ggg Entered by: It-M.GA::tN .. :..J Date Entered: IQJK~9t.~()P.7,..J Record: 1 01 5 Select farcel Numbers Like 1662340:0132 I .oK I Status: I Type: I SUbTYPe:I-1 [ Faters: --•• ~." Entered Date Between: ~/_;_. and~ Thursday, Oct 11,2007 12:50 PM Select Multiples & Make Activity Set r Show Address Attachments r .... -;---10\-----..... Back,S.top r W 't:)I ~ . Select Un-$el ® King County Road Services Division Department of Transportation KSC-TR-0222 201 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104~3856 February 28, 2007 TruvestLLC P.O. Box 1754 Renton, W A 98057 RE: Road Variance L06V0062 -Truvest Short Plat Dear Applicant: Thank you for your application for a variance from the King County Road Standards (KCRS). You requested a variance from Section 2. 10 of the KCRS concerning the intersection spacing for the access onto SE 192nd Street. The location at SE 192nd Street is a principal arterial for which the KCRS requires a minimum of 1,000 feet of intersection spacing. We reviewed your proposal and agree that the existing private road extending northward at the III block of SE 192nd Street is the most viable access to your site. Wetlands within sensitive areas and within County road easement obstruct potential road connections to the north of the site. The intersection spacing to the north from the private road is 375 feet to 113th Way SE, and to the south is 330 feet to 11 Oth Place SE. I approve the reduced intersection spacing for the proposed road improvement of the existing private road. This decision applies only to KCRS identified in the variance request. All other design requirements in the KCRS and other regulations, such as surface water management and zoning, must still be satisfied for a land use permit application. The applicant retains the rights and privileges afforded by King County Code and adopted Public Rules pertaining to road variance processing (KCC 14.42, PUT 10-2). This variance decision is valid for one year from date of letter unless an associated land use permit is pending or submitted within the one year period. In these cases, the variance decision is valid for the duration of the permit processing. Truvest LLC February 28, 2007 Page 2 A copy of staff's analysis, findings, and conclusions is enclosed. If you have any questions, please call Craig Comfort, Road Variance Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, at 206-263-6109. Paulette Norman, P.E. County Road Engineer PN:CC:kc cc: James Sanders, P.E., Development Engineer, Land Use Services Division (LUSD), Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) Pete Dye P.E., Senior Engineer, LUSD, DDES Linda Dougherty, Division Director, Road Services Division (RSD), Department of Transportation (DOT) . Matthew Nolan, P.E., County Traffic Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT Fatin Kara, P.E., Supervising Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT Kris Langley, Senior Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT Craig Comfort, P.E., Road Variance Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT King County Road Services Division Department of Transportation Traffic Engineering Section MS KSC-TR-0222 201 South Jackson Street Se.attle, WA 98104 February 28, 2007 TO: Variance File FM: Craig Comfort, P.E., Road Variance Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section RE: Road Variance L06V0062 -Truvest Short Plat Applicant's Presentation: 1. The proposed Truvest Short Plat is for nine lots on an existing private street extending north off the King County principal arterial of SE I 92nd Avenue. The private gravel road is 375 feet west of 1 13th Way SE and serves five homes. A private road to the west, 11 Oth Place SE is 330 feet from the proposed short plat access road (the existing gravel road). The King County Road Standards (KCRS) requires 1,000 feet of intersection spacing along a principal arterial. 2. There is no viable alternative access to the short plat. The existing gravel road access is in private road easements. A thirty-foot public road easement extends from III th Place SE to the northwest comer of the proposed short plat. However, several wetlands within the easement area block any road connection. To the west ofthe public easement is a tract owned by King County as access to a pond. The tract also is encumbered with private access easements and the easement holders will not permit a road within the tract. 3. The existing private gravel road will be improved to a KCRS minor access road classification. Approximately 15 lots are projected to be served by the road with future short platting of adjacent lots. Staffs Findings and Conclusions: 1. Concurrence with the applicant's presentation. The wetlands to the north and the limited road easement width of30 feet all but preclude a road connection. 2. The entering sight distance at the access point to SE 192nd Street exceeds KCRS minimums. ~ King County DOES Parcel Information Report This report was generated: 10/11/20072:52:36 PM Parcel Number: 6623400132 8 Base Info Parcel Number: 6623400132 Tax Payer: EGGEBRECHT ERVIN E Property Name: N/A Annexation: Benson Hill (Pending) Jurisdiction: King County Situs Address: 11044 SE 192ND ST Zip Code: 98055 Postal City ::J Reference Info Plat Name: PANTHER LAKE GARDEN TRS Plat Recording Date: N/A Plat Lot: 13 Plat Block: N/A Kroll Page: 604 Thomas Brothers Page: 686 1/4-S-T-R: SE-32-23-5 Lot Area: 84,506 SqFt. (1.94 Acres) S Planning Info Zoning: R-8 Comprehensive Land Use: urn Assessor's Open Space: N/A Commercial Use: N/A Number of Units: N/A The Information Included In this report has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and Is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or Implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such Information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, InCidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the Information contained in this report. Any sale of this report or Information on this report \s prohibited except by written permission or King County. Appraised Land Value: 2005 -$124,000, 2006 -$245,000 Appraised Improvements Value: 2005 -$201,000, 2006 -$112,000 a Administrative District Info Community Plan Area: soos Creek Unincorporated Area Council: N/ A School District: Renton School District 403 (403) Fire District: King County Fire Protection District No. 40 (40) Roads MPS Zone: 341 ($3,362) Roads Transportation Concurrency Mitigation Zone: 797 Waterfront: No Water System: WATER DISTRICT Water Service Planning Area: N/A Sewer System: PUBLIC Airport Noise Remedy Program: N/A Council District: 5 Julia Patterson Drainage Basin: Black River: WRIA 9 Police Jurisdiction: King County Police Precinct: 3 Police District: F3 Snowload Zone: Standard Agricultural Production District: N Forest Production District: N Page 1 of 2 Rural Forest Focus Area: N Transfer Development Rights Type: N/A Transfer Development Rights Status: N/A Transfer Development Rights Permit Number: N/A 8 Inspection Area Info Building Inspection Area: 5-6 Clearing Inspection Area: Richelle Rose Code Enforcement Inspection Area: Bill Turner ESA Inspection Area: Kathy Newborn Grading Inspection Area: Ramon Locsin Land Use Inspection Area: Mike Meins S Sensitive/Critical Area Info Sensitive Areas Notice(s) on Title: None Sensitive Historic Site: None Bald Eagle Data: Bald Eagle Flag: N/A Aquatic Areas Buffer: N Basin Condition: Low Flow Control Area: N/A Water Quality: N/A Critical Aquifer Recharge Area: None Area of Potential Wetland Influence: N Shoreline Management Master Program Designation: None Page 2 of 2 By law this information may not be used for commercial purposes. I Taxpayer Tax Status TAXABLE Taxable Value Reason NONE OR UNKNOWN ~--"--"'----EGGE-B-RECHTE-RvIN-1PaTcerNuMbef"""'~"7F~'~'Y':662346ni-32·::'J axpayer E Ac~ount ·Number "" -"66234001'3207 ,·".,w~~w·~,"···_,,~ •• ~ •. __ •. ~_M'W ___ "'·~'· __ ' ___ ,,_. ___ _ Tax Year 2008 Levy Code 4250 Tax Status TAXABLE District Name Property Name Plat Name Plat Block Taxable Value Reason NONE OR UNKNOWN KING COUNTY PANTHER LAKE GARDEN TRS Property RESIDENTIAL Present Single Family Use (Res Use/Zone) SectionlTownship/Range SE 32 23 5 I Legal Description Address PANTHER LAKE GARDEN TRS W 1/2 LESS S 130 FT 11044 SE 192ND ST 98055 Page 1 of2 Year Built Year Renovated Total Living SqFt This report was generated: 10/11/20072:53:43 PM Enter a 10 digit Parcel Number: or Enter an address: I Search I King County I GIS Center I News I Services I Comments I Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The QJ!tIDl~_, Page 2 of2 r-=-- -. ~: 1'--1-_ .~-hill':' .- -1-- SE 32-23-05 ": tu ~ :; 0620); , H ,,< " • .1 6 1411 .. ... f)3 ... ~ O~?O :; ' .. 163B~ ... ;(J~0 ;, , JI.61 , ., ISMT. Cl,KE O!l!i 1312.43 86.34 " 50 30 14375 S ~ 0153 ::t-______ -"'"'"5 ____ --' N 90 , 5 " 7500 s 0152 129 07 38042 SF 0134 53 . , ~ , • , ,. ';1,;" 6035 SF 0560 0600 'J~.b N NI,8e-50-I8 W (ROBERT MCLVILLE RD. NO 1119, EST. 2-5-1917, c;t. COMM. VOL. 20-69, S 89-: 161.56 32 .12 P. 161.56 iIi [I! Iii [Ii ,!I Iii iii 131.32 STATE Of ,rum " WASHINGTON LINE On thiS Clay persDnally B~~~~""1:ql{!,t.9rl! • .m!" to ... known to bt tn~ lnd1v1E11.Jals de.~r1Dea 1n DEPARTMENT or DEVELOPr..£NT AND [NVIRQNLlENTAL $[RVIcrs APPROVED THIS L~ DAY or .H..,..lCX...t\.., 20~. ~'EF£ofu~- lAND USE SE1MCES OMSlON PARCEL No. {5) 6623400131 6623400133 KING COUNTY DEPART~ENT OF ASS(SSMENT~ "'PROVED 71-!IS WL.9"Y, Of. ., • ><:INTU£ 0 ~""''''''' .~knO .. ha;ea Ulat ___ lIilJOaa tn. salle as __ -.:~r ... .~e~ute~ the .. 1tlltn and foregDing instrument anO '.-:. I I ana volUM"":,, act ana aR<!. tar the uses ana purpalle~··,:: . i:t "'are in .. ntIonea. .• "" •....•• fI Signal ..... <>I NotQry f>ublie Ocr.e: ~~U1t _____ _ EOW'IoIOO .Ii: OIErHOOOlG'I' ~ roTA!. STATlOH .II: HI' ~B DATA . - THIS "REQUEST OUAUFIES FOR EXEIojPTION UNDER KCC 19A.2B. IT DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT THE LOTS WILL er SUITASLE FOR DEVELOPLlEI'.'T NOW OR IN THE FUTURE. THE LeGAL TRANSFER OF THE PROPERTY IoIUST £I( DONE BY 5f;PARATE lNSTRUIoIH..-r UNLESS All LOTS HEREIN lIRE llNOCR THE SAUE OWNERSHIP. 2DDlo'-jB SCALE: PORnON OF -----./' 0~ f\~(jB ~ CHINQUAPIN RIDGE IQlI.&I£ 1~ PIa:S 5/; -61 SW 1/4 01 SE 1/~, L3...2. T 23_N_, R,2-L.W.1.I OLD LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: t.aT ... (TAX PARCO. ~-ol.u) lOT" or lONG COUrm' SHORT PlAT NUIoIBER $9050211. RECORDED UNOER RECORrrNG NUIotBEfl 9208189007. ~~~~~P~T~~:=E~~~I PAGE 25, IN KING COUNTY. WA.'ifjING'!ON. SUBJreT TO TIlE CONOIl"IONS ccwr....a IN llIJCUIEHT flECOROED 29 SEPT[UBER, 1966 UNDER RECORDING No. 5792302. LOT a (T,o,x PAACEl. 662340-01J1) "!ME SOUTH 150 FITT OF TIlE u.sr 85 rttr OF T1tf.CT 13. PAIffi£R LAKE GAA!l(N liIAC1S, ACCORDING TO THE PlAT THEREOF". RECORDED IN VOUlWE 9 ~ PlATS, PAGE: 25. IN I KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON -I~ 't<) I~ , I n£!I WITH. T_T P'O<U"I_ Of" "2TH A\lENU;o air '-'".~ ..... Kit«: COUWT'I' ORDINoVlCE UNDUl RECOF!Oltffi NUI.IElER fASOIEr.' RECORDED 20 AIJGUST, 199,. UND£R 911l8201 IllS. &oISOlEN7 RECORDED 17 ~eER. 1992. UNDER ,.9211170897. """""". ct.OSED AND/OR BALANCED FiELD TRA"'ERSE AND EI.£C"IRI)NC DIITA COl.llcnoN. ~ ~~W~~~T£lJTI£~~~~·~1 ., ...... :~ -_~~ ~~I£ ~ ____ L ___ ~'SI~t·"Zf;~· The I'ositioncl U<>COrtaifl1y tor any physieQI point "" u;. _ I"8IaIMo to <lOY _ ~ point "" til;' """'e)'. Including Iood- in ......--... less tt>an 0.07 feet -+-5Oppm. CERTIFICATE ___ "C.-. 7 •. ~_.~. FILED rOR RECORD THIS JR DAY OF ~200."" "T~ IN 8001< ZtP' .. Or.wv.· AT ?AGEo.~AT THE R(OUEST Of G. PHil SARGOn (lIJtt. IivJl.LA. ··SlJ?1".··()t· R'E"COClOS····· LAND SUR\l£'(OR'S CERTIFICATE THIS BOUNDARY UN!: ADJUSTMENT CORREC"TL':' REPRESEN1S A SURVE"l' WADE 5Y t.I£ OR UNOCR 1.1'1' DlREC"TION IN CONrORt.lANCE WIT:-I STATE AND COUNTY STA;UTES. SE Dryco Surveying, Inc. 12714 VALLEY AVENUE EAST SUMNER, WA 98390 253-826-0300 fox 253-826-9703 • • • ~ f 13 • ~ • i ---"'~~ l .. e-;-:.:,~"·_~'S~,c_.,..., .. c: __ 0fY _ IMt • h-,-..,.; iI-rh~:~\;,. ... a.-h..l" __ I;,."".. t ~ ':::hr,,,-~,n,... 019'*111\10 "' .. """ ........ _odgooll\ I. 1M ( .... ~)!reo ... ---.. ........ ""'_ .... _IIWI_h""'iII_~ • :=-~ 0;1 ,pt.,' ed I'm"" _....D.iaw ~: ",_.J rll.;:;)Q.<n ~ .. ""I~·,oJq II, ""'_1 ....... 1~·I . .f qq C"t:;RTlFlCATE .~.1.9.~/Lt.QCV flecj for .oKOrd tlll .. 1L~:doy of£ ......... 19.f.7 ... o .:X.lW In bool<.IL.1_ ... out'AIot pog.tLfAat the request of ... ...) APPROVALS: DEPARTW£NT CfC DEnI ~"" __ IIo" --AND 0MtCt6I00N.. ~CES ~1~_~,.31 _ 6I:b..,. of fib am, 1'~ Tract '9' 12 DEPARTMENT Of ASSESSMENTS '-•• ~'_"Al-.,. EetJ .. fZ I <t;'l!!/Hll!9Cll IllS 119 Scorr ...,""""" . 11.1JJ"ft;: l~" eo I'l. ............ of JiE_'/4. s._~_ T.23.l'! R.M_W.M. """" FOUND Il(lWI .It eN' .".,,'" 5 FOUND loIONUWEl'IT ... cur "'-"''''''''''''''-. ~=~CAP am IIHIIllT • Of' I_L'OR NOTa • 00NDfTI0M, or -"'"'OVAL lOt.......... 2.01* AICIIIm ~ KlI"TJ ---L.Dl'ZI~c:lflD(NYDIllfATEl.JO;XlIIIIII; /7t" ".~-" to lItE PIAl" llUlOf". /I£CCIIIlO 1I...uuw: " ./ ~~ccak~ .,:;.----s.ux:r to ~ IiJIIII. C(iICIIflQIII UICO R!t. ICl laotl10148 _ 1IOOZIOOD1_! • .... at' ........ c;,uICO" mATtS. /ICCI)IIIDIIIi; to lItE PlAl1H1J1£1lf'. IOOIIDID II \WJIj( ~~~ ,HA(,~ ~~:~~E~ _: _. . _ . 1; tl.~ ,,,,,,,,.,,,, TAJCLOT ..• No .. 2698 .. 20 O~20 P .. .. (20&)2.51-11782 r.... .' , _, ' ~ <:> • • 0IM0I. IIY I 'OA"1!; •••• ": 1--JOB 1«1.:":-49 ~ co ~CJWl.~LNO~ EIGIoI .u.YZ.IW5: '·:.91 4 .. .. ... ~_1DMCES ' . .~.. ....... CHICO. BY I SCAlL l~Er:T :c' '","Q fJjG'II''-I I , .. , ,." "CONOlllON80F)APPROVAL N.~TJ?$tAE8!AICTI~,t.I$"""", \ _:;,='?'::::::=:rr:~~TOA::ioEac" ~ "II'IlEMST .... TIt( ~_~ (101: K1'lICK ~_·NIEItEST ttCt.WD£S lHE ~ ... ~ " ... , .. :u.~ WW''''1K!H~Of~~m~~wr~ .," ST"'tIlJIY. ~ AUUI.. IUfl'VIM. ANO ~ Of I"l.MT NIO ..t.JIIj,I,L tWlTAT. ..... ~.~~.&t::t.'£~4tr~~~AH) ."ON IOWF.Of ~ 1'IAIJC.:t'f KINO C(Um';'fO t.r.M: UNrIIST\ift8£D .au. T!IreI ...... D OTl1ER .··-'o£GEf ... TlCItII:~ 11C WIIJO( ~'1H[ ~TIcM WIf!CIH TIl[ SETaICK AREA tolAY ..aT : ...... 8E CUT._.f'tU\IlO. ~ IY n..L...~ BIt e .... ~·WIIlIOUI" .\IIIIOO.IIIIIl.jN WRIBoIG, ~ I(lIoIG C(IUIm ~ (#.·DI'IUOI'WDU-NIO WMC£S·OR.lTS S\.ICIDSOII: .<oaENCT,:\H.DS ~ ~.Ir'I': . . •. ,., ..... THE COIIWOfrt ~ ~ nc.iITwoc ARif,.: ...... ~:m ..wA QF-'~(Hf ~': .,' =,"ll)~~~OIfOJ::c"~~~nsr~~~::.; .. / AClMTY ON ... LOT $UIJ[tT TO M:~·:NIEA SCTtW:IC ~ "00: REOlJIRED ~ .... 011 f\..OoGCING SIW.I. _ IN ~ 'UN1I.. -.IU. tl£\I£l.OPIoItN PIICIP05N. IICfM1lES 1M 1HE : .• ~~~==:..m~TH[~~'~.:~~ .. :,,/'. UNLESS ~ ~I)ED 81 L,q. .::.:....... •. .,' ... '" ,~ .,' :t =~: II{ ~ JttI'>\IIUtI. AIIO/OIII M8UIlT 9T THE O"'«RS'~.THE .:":: PARC£LS I'Wo'IIG t.moL IICetsS TICRIJ"ROY NIO THDA ~ IoSSIGNS OR SUCC£SSCIRS;:<' \M.£SS IHJ t.Nh. SUCH IIQOOII AM IIIfIIIMD Ttl KlNC COIMTY STJo/CWIDS N<IO.IoRE •• DEDIClTm NIO IC:V'Tm ~ MIHC COUNTY rolf WINTDwICE. _IIC: KNO CQUNIY _ NO RnfJOMII8UTY TO 1UI1.ll. IWPRCHE. IWNTAIN OR ~ SDI'Cf lHE II1II"""1"( IIGIOS alNTM£D _ OR ~ SDMCE to TttE __ ~ IlDCIIIfI[I)IN fIG SHCIRI" I'lAT . . """" .......... D:UICD ~QSKIICt~ IIQ/IIJf CRWJ •. ",.i'i:Ot!o ~ MTE lIN' (filii) ,.' _:.No. 5JDlX09l7 F (w.,y le, 1096) .,/ ~~ifo~~k"!OltF1.OOO~· :.\ .. :, .... , .. :~' nno.-.'= ..... uirl:;eo oJ""~it. STATIOIt..1!Ml-5DR-ll" I)A,T ... COl..L£CTOR. .. :.:....... ~~_~L~~~ ...... ODISTNtCE. .":,.".,. "'~~~~~.~=:aw.:T~~~_~?,C££DS ~ STN<IOAROS FOR II. wps n:d\0It THIS··~·liU.l.fIU 1£ ~.ir M ~ f'fj(vi/--';"'~ STAG£. &~~~~r_~~~~·:;Acr.~l{~~::~ ~.~ ~".~ ~~'.~ .. 7. -THE HOUSE ~ smEN FIlII ntti.: SH:lIIT PU/"'Al1..'·I\S~: :.,,: AllORESS£S SIW.I. II{ AISICONED··F'OfIll1l_ NOII'TH-SOUlIi IICWIS MlI*I,"fH[ IWiICE or .' ~~A/C)~n:u::i·Qf~~r . ..:: SCALE: "1" PORllON OF" Jl_~'/' of SE "/4. '--~ T,23N . ..... . .,.- ENTIWICE OF [,t,Qi ItlsOENcE OJ! ~~.c:i:lo~ WITH·.i<M:: COWm COQE.'ie.O$.- I. 11ft fUME IIIEiuNct ",T MTHRoI n.s SIdI1 1'l.A.;~,.t'.~ ..it" (N.r.pA:·/ ...... ,. .... ..... ~ flit[ I'I'IO"IlClJ:lI ~!TNClMD 130 Sf'!!INoQ..DI SYSttIoI... . a THE IIOoID ...... 0 STOItIoI DfWfoIo'4[~5W.L 8[ CONSTRI)Clm ~:~ ~E AP.P.~ -r PLAN IH) PIIOfII.E, PI..I.N ~. Oft ru WITH KINC COlMTY OEJ'JoIITWENT ()f":"O£IIEI..OPt,IENT ~OMJION~Al.~I'W.ftIn:~~:rn.~.o~s.APPItCPIED Pl.ANS WII::C.~~ .. #HA<t ~~'\ o -\ -i ~ .' ~'It ... GEMo.""t. ~- 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT. WA 98012 (206)251-6222 (2<l6)251-8182 fAX Uo'L ENCH:ERWG. lNID PWHNG. 5IJR\IEVINC. ENWIOtiIENTAl SEIMCES UP ~ d , " m ~I J ~ I _ ~ 1 1 ~ ] ~~ ~ it j L l} ~~ ~ II ~' ~ • 1 1 ~d ~~ ;i :! TS "3AV " H.19 1 1 " .... ---'hSY~."j~i;~;i~~~t:~~~-"o:~;~~;~ . -- -- _ -3 _ :: • , , ~ ~~ ~~ i! ~i ~ i'! 1!] 6 [11. § • !~~ ~ hr! ~ H~~ 3 iW J' j ~ ~ " . !:n < , ! ilIj ~ H ~ c< L t " .. ' -" .",: .. :-' .. " ~_, . , .. ' .... , US 88 . {: : 'UOALJ)ESCRIPT!9'N: .=: t.OT I..t;~· 013 C~"~T ~. NO,S'.~~ AI IIlCOfII)f:D UHDI:A ~ NO. ~2111012. ~~./::. KIHG~, WASHIHQTON . VILLAGE GATE SE1/4, SECTION BINDING SITE PLAN 32 TO'MII$HIP 23 NORTH. RANGE KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON 5 EAST. W.M. SHEET 1 OF 2 ~ • • r , "".=;~~~::t~:~::::::~N:;:_: =:~::;·O';:EftIS~i;:;~~~b,. =NoP~~Wrr~ _ ..... : .... ::._ £MFOIlCEMEJ((.'THE"PAbVlSI9.NS OF THIS IIIfC)ING SiTE PLAN lAND THE: '~=--Orc~~~~~~A=~~ ::,~~~~~~~~~~<=~"S~'i:RQ~~~~~ ii I ~ AND HEMIY IOUHD ltV. THIS ~ SlTE:"-AN. ~ K.ff IA.HK Of··, W .... HINGTON, ... WASHiNalO,..-' 1ANKlNG.:COIV'O~;-'MOfITGAMtI H£AlIY DECI.AR1S THIS BINOING'-SITE" P1.. ... 'U'l!ASUANr.TO A[vISEO cODj OF :: ~~.!..~rRi:T;:C=. :'s~;~~~~=,Ti,DNOI~. .,:~,. ~~E~1?Z~I~~~E=~:;;'i~ ... ",/' AND IN ACCClfID.lNCE WITH. SIJOI Dn-IEPI GOYEI'IMoENTAL Pl!It!roIITS .... PPlitW:-· "'LS. REGUlATIONS, R!OVIREMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS TH ... T MAY IE INI'CISED UPON SUCli lAND IoK1 THE DEVEl.OI'Ma(T AND USE THEN:OF. t-"OH COWUT1DN. THlIMI'ROV!MIINTS ON THE LAND SHAlL IE INClUDED IN ONE 0"-MOP!! ~ Oft 0WNm BY AN ASSOCI-' noN 011 OTHEA.lEOAL INTITY IN WHICl'I llIE OWNE1t$ OF UNI'TS lliEMlN O!I THEift OWNEII'S A$$OCo\TIONS HAVE ... MfMBERSHlP Of! OTHER LEGAl 0lI aENEFIClAlINTER- lIT. THIS IIN)ING SlTI PLAN SHAU. If IINDING UPON ALL NOW OI!. lftIIIN'Trll H.AVINO ANY INTEI'I!ST IN THE lAND DESCIllIED HEIIflN. _ ~_.,.. ur '". U'PO' ...... 'U'ON'n" ........... ~I'" "!': ....... -=~~~""':'~AIN,~~NI~II~~ WAYI a IIIPONIIIU POA ANY SUCH II;ICflEATIOPW. '-'CIUT1E$:.~ COMMON SITI ...... TUN.. .:.: ...... :, .. MUl.T1.f'U11POA A.CCUa AND USl. D£CI.NIAHT H£IIf1Y GIIAHTS NON-''''" lXCLUSIV! ACCESS ~D USE OVER AHO ACIIOSS SAID LAND fOR INGRESS NtO IQMII AKJ OVI.I'I AKJ...cItOA OTHUIIASIMIHTI, IIOADWAYS, AND UTIUTV UNR PICIFIIJ) IN THE IiNI)INQ SITI "'-AN DR mAlUSHED IN 01'1 ow SAID !.AND AND IMPftOVEM!NTI THEIIUO. SUCH MSlIIVATIONS AAE FOil TH! I'IJM'OSE OF: COMPUTING. AND THEMAFTVI USING AM) OPERATING, ALL PHAlli 0' DIVElOI'M!NT 0' SAID LAND; AND I'IJIISUANT TO P.CW CHAFrEJII 1104.34. CREATING EllliEII A SINGlf CONOOMlMUM Oil TWO 01'1 MOllE SEPIJIATE CONDDMIMUMS. 11-+E EASEMEm$ I'IES(IIVEO HEREUNOEII SHAll. iNTtTLi THf DECLARANT. 0111 ITS $UCCESSOIIIS, TO TIE IIIITO WATER. SIWIIt JTOI'IM S!W!1t !LfCTftlCAi.. GAS. TfLEPHONE, OJI OTlfEl! UTlUTY liHIl 0' AU. VAfIlETlES, AND TO CONNIeT WITH ROADWAYS Oil UTIlITY SnTDU OEVELOPEO AHa EMI'l.ACED ON SAID lAND. I. IlllULTl-f'WIIIOIIlMINTlMNtCf. EXCEPT AS DTHEIIWISe PAOVIDED BY lAW, I>KJ EXClPTTO l'HE EXTENT MAlNTtNANCE IS PEfIFOfWUllY A PUBUC Oft I'IWAn!NTlT'l' PftOVIDING UTIUTV SEllVlCE, ALL i"IIESENT AND AJTUFlE OWI\EJII OF THf I.AND SUIJKT TO THIS IINOING SITE PL.AH SHAll t,lAlIIITAIH ANDIIlP.t.JIII AlL MlA[)WAYS, PAI'IKlNG AMAS. UTlUTtES A.HO OI'\AJNAGE FACIUTIH. I\ECflEATIONAl 'ACIUTIES AND OlllER COMMON SITE FEATURES -....... I. ItOVIIINMIHT 1ASDIDn". /IJN GOVllINaoIENTAl ENTITY HAVING JUIlllSOICTlOH OF THE lAHD $UlJfCl TO nns BINDING SIT( PI.AH AND THE IMPfICl .... MlNTI THIIlUO, AND At« PUaLJC 011 PIIIIVATE ENTITY I'IIOVIDING UTUTY IPMCIlli!ltlTO. St-IAU HAW A NIOtUXCLUIIVE EASEMENT FOR NIIIfII AHlJ IGIIlIS OVIIII AND AC"CII11AlCl1.AHD FOIl TKE PUIIPOS£ OF IHINCTlDN, MAlNTENA.NCE AND IIEPAIIII. 1. HOnea. ANY DEMAND TO IE MADE UPON Oil ANY NOTICE HEREUNDElI TO II!! GIVEN TO THE OWNER 01'1 OWNflIS OF n.lE LAND SUIIJECT TO THIS BlNDINQ SITE PLAN IHALL III IN WI!IT1NG AND MAILED, POSTAGE ""'EPAID, c.TI'IID MAL IIIT\JIIN IIICfiPT MOUIlTED, TO llIE lAST !(HOWN MAIUNI) A.DOIII!II OF SAID OWNlIII. .: ::~~~~~Fa:~r~=g~~r;~:n~ryO~ ANY,'1'EIISDN O~.l'J':~ot$ VIOLATING QIt-ATTtMI'Tl~ TO \I!OLATE AN'( :·$~=~=':=!~EiTE TIONOJINEMENT, ~EXEACISI: .".,·tllGfrrsj(!.wN CdHTAINEO. SHAlL IN NO Eyi;MT BE DEEMEp:A WAlVEII.of lliE IIlatiT TO DQ$O lliEREArnll. AlL cos:rs WCURIIED ~-THE ~ Of.l'He$f:~. t;:QlllDlTIO/'!IS, -~~~~,;~~~'. Of lliE PI'm~NS HVlEOf' BY JIJDilMEHT OfJ'OOUR'fOl'lDEJll SHAU,.,.. NO WAV AfFEcf:-.t..NX OT~;~ PI'IOVI~ HEIIE~ ... ,.' .'-' .' I, IIHOINO ~&CT.~· THIS,f9jNDIl"fG .~ ~ lAND .~E FOfIEOO.:.ri ':".~'- =~~;~~J::.AS~=~"'S~ AND SHAlL !If 8INDING UPON AU. PARTIES ANtr~ I'EIISONS'WHO' ........ OR; SHALL BECOME Tl-IE OWNER Of. Of! 01l1EJ1WlSE AAVE AN INTtIIEST IN. 1)ie LAND DESCIllBED HEIIElN. .: .... :" "'" ..... ,.,., ••.. IN WITNESS WHEREOF WE SET DUIII HAHOS AND SEAlS 11-+IS.J..U.... CAY O,r.""' ... ,-:.- MARCH 'R9.8 : ....... , .• /' DECLARANT: KEY BANI( OF WASHINGTON "-WASHINGTON IlANKING CDAf'. ",q~~ rrs: ;; .. J?qf.,. APPROVALS ~' --"'~ "4Ilol J. NOS ~ DAY tF ~ ,oe.- PL. • ~ DAY tF t?"J"Jll'CK ln12.... QIC ~:'~;nENT a" ~TS ~""!O.~1HIS~o.o.YfT hlAt,cL-,nL- .. d·i.··n; "'0/.4. p, ... g1 'PL',) Y ASSt$S(II DD'UTY _ C ~~ ...' •• ' QOCl ~ ~IUIIIIEJI. "63'1"-~/.u. •.•. ""'. ~E'> .,' 'o'". 1AD"iHAl 1IOf;:;~ ,.g f:fl..NQI.£NT <i:f.j~;;~:tJ-~'-~-[4' roM.~ Aloio lItAl ...... 5P£QAl ill ~~~~~IHE~=fW.. ~-~ .... ~,~~;~ -:{~;~~-~ RECllRDlloIa cEi'iTtF,UiATE fI..ED roM IIECCIIID Al11€ 1lE000l fT n<£ _ CClINrr 00UNt:a. MS ~ tlAytF en d .... ,... '''L..A..D..AJ~~lE5PAST~ ....., IIECOIIIDm II "«l.IJY( ~ OF PUT$, ~ACE$ ~ II£\XIIIDS tF ICING IXlI.IIlY,~ • " ~ I );J lUnd 5t"".n£NDDn tF REcaIDS lIE NO.~/' IE, STATE OF WASHINGTON > ''''. COUNTY OF WG..-> tJ06.$ Fka.Iet:.r;,h. B"fY,c.ot#>ZJ Aa1V"}' ""'" L'fflOOISI M ""'., r :: ...... :.;.'" .. ,-:.,-.-. .,.:" ,.-.,::' o-E-t~ __ l :-: 4~,A~'tf~~~ .JOB (425) 885-1817 Y4~J 885-79$3';fu NO. 940f5~ ... N .. o N I- W W :t aJ I- I I I I I M.tl,o;1.9 H i .• ;' ....... ~t ·.~ .. ,-~.,"''''''' ......... ,' ...... --..... • IL o I- W W :t III · .. ·······-ID o "I v .. o 01 I- W w J: (/j I o < 'is 'ONZ:B~ ':rs ONIlfl'JII.«I Sl$Y8 ".g',o'ai N ! &1~9 ~ ~ .--:Ir-------------; f-----_ I")J' \'. I I I POINT II-A, SURVEY MAP AND PLANS FOR VILLAGE GATE, PHASE 1 5£1/4. SECTlON 32 TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 5 EAST. W.f.4. KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON .)) .. ~.-.. " , ..... 'f I u~~/ .J=.~':;":"""" ..•.• , ... " .• ' //' ",. ,.-.~, OPEN TO BELOW 106 I STAIRS !;j ~ .. ,. • .". 10.7 1191671 F.·nO.<I C."78 .• .' '.: ". '"··'·Ij·'·"~;" .. ' .:'; .,,,,.!,!ELm:; ~ " , •. ;; ~./ Il..:i' " ;~ '" ISTAiiiS. 119165r '['''-'(7"0.5 C_478.5 • " " ~"!I""'"., .. ", '\~~:. ~-_~:6J ... 1-· , 0 u I,!, , .. ,. I, I" 11.7 o :.:,. " ,0· J.-" DECK/PATIO LIMITED COMMON ELEMHH ITYPI ""',, .,.... "" fN,Q,<S1'ciRY"" ""'~">::'" ',/" ..... , ..... Jij., rO'''T '. ,,,'" ,,: ~ .. , <= no ." .. ' ...•... :" .. ',' ., 125 158 ~ 8'~' , •• '" I " I 1191611 ",,: ' , ".'. " ,.~ ~:.' SHEET 3 OF 4 A CONDOMINUM GENERAL NOTES 1. UNIT DNENSIONS A.RE TO THE: INTERIOR SURfACE; OF THE STUO WA,U -'NO .t.R( SHO ..... MtHlN ± 0.10 'En 2. C(JUNG EL£VA,nONS ARE TO THE lOMR SURFACE OF THE C(JUHC $I-I(ET ROCK AoNO A.RE SHO'MIl wrlHlN :I: 0-10 "". 3. FLOOR EL£YAOCINS ARE TO lHE U~ SURrACE OF THE FLOOR (EXClUSIV£ OF CARPETINC AoND .ARE ~ ¥IITlIlN ± 0.10 FEET. /,,·:'3~, muoOR .... ,,' " "'" ,_ . BOUNDARY AT LEVEl SHO'/IIN. .,./ / •.. :. ··~·:;~~:.·~ .. ~:~~LEv;:~., .,.=" .. ,"'"" .. ,;;,.........i/"'/· "'\" .,' :,'. ~r , 11~@::2b:;~"',~;~~ p;;;_ ... ::: .... -'-'-.-"-'.,::fIRUJ< .. ~ .•. C£luN{ EL.EV"-ll~ V-@ ···,:~~C£.i:·~WNE.Yti··' tz@ UWlTED ~WON ruwDn , ...... , •. ,( y ? 10 20 4p ,." i ~::::, o "·'i' ... ;>i,i:'::,'j '" /\:: '., -it n ...•. ,: ... TO---''''''-~ .. _...<:~''',:' :."" , I ·,,, .. r: ~-" .~TAIRSJ~ ",.",,---0] ~ ,. I ",., Tp_~ (: ""\ ~iS~;:;R;~ ~ 11~~,t'--' C~.78.5 -.:.:'.:~ •... SCALE IN FEET POINT 1\-£1 <I n 7.1 -8--.", .... , .... 5.5 lJ ~.7 10 2 ,~.S1.5 :.:' 58 I i'f ... '" C~.S9.5:: 8.4 .:. 7.9 '" 5.8 " 10 c CARAGE CARA.G£ " )190113.31 ~ r~.61.4 <0 f··61.' I;: C_469.5 ;::;,,~ GARAGE o ..., C~.69.5 '" ".3 1ST STORY BUILDING 11 f"·61 .• C~'69 6 1·.0 " 9 17.3 ~ POINT 12-A ~'~ .-0" . 114\6 ~~ .. SURVEY MAP AND PLANS FOR SHEET 4 OF 4 VILLAGE GATE, A CONDOYINUM PHASE 1 SEll., SECTION 32 TO'hNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 5 EAST. W.t.I. KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON ., .. ." ....... _. . .. :~;.? I '" I I ","" ./ .i ..'::~j:,""'::.:'~,"" .' . h-------······:"OPtN-.···' ,t·, <1---'il ..:// OPEN TO BElOW ~ TO ~ -BELOW c N 1;~;:5k1l' f ~4?O~, .. , J ~RS '-.2' N '" 1191731 85 fr " "'~':"! ,. ,~.'" [I ~ " 1,",,, '~."" ~ 1191711 ~·~.,~··:-;' ... ·T1·6: .. '-~I ~::;:: 5"'~~;;; C~::.~:~;; STAIRS ~ .. ~ C~~II", C"4Mi .l .-., •. , c,·: :: ~D.,~.9RY, ... " (. "7~_, .,' ·'i_;. ..,1 ST~R5. '" ~ 'f 1 ~;_/' IlInnl r.Hr·~ . ,' ".,-: .,' Ef'/ DECK,.,AM 1I1.11lED COI.II.IQN -, r'l. .'l'~:·· ,:." ,C' ,< L':'~':'t .' ':: . ~ ii''',,' • , "EL'MENT (T)l') '--::<1 " ~-~l ~.)~~ '" ~~"~" ,,\.,ri;f, •. :-~ ~~. ,,,' uo,~( 41.\~ I 1191711 1191731 I I;:: I Itg.t7.~L· 1191771 ;;.~: I f~~ijl,5 ~ r_~I.~ I '::. I r_~t;.L5 ··f·o:;4M." :'-li' I I C-~6~6 N C~4696 I C~4786 ';.4786 ':.-.. 1 1-~4~~1", ,''':<£.'IEi-· 1'-' :. u ___ _J '" 1"--lT.-T .. -· ---.. T-· -114--'r:,. ",., " f_"l ,': .-. ~10 (. 47e7 ~I ,2 L_~T~'!.S,_"J"> 0> "'L __ SJ~,IR.LJ ."" ••. ~~ $":!" • ~r-sT~Rs,i:;.;.:~ ~--C4f,qh--:.J 1)6 C .. ~7!16 C~47fi6 ~1 '::'. L-~-r-"""I";" .-r'''" '~~ "., ~I~" '" ~ ]" ,,. :1'" " . 10' ~~'i" .-' ;'~" l-~~-" r:;;: ; ; "'" ;, ":", Ii C> r .. 4blJ r_46\~ .... C .. ~59 7 C.~.69 8 "===~"~';"" '" . ,~ . -I. ". 1ST STORY BUILDING 12 /." .... GENERAL NOTES I. UNIT DIoIENSIONS ARE TO THE INTERIOR SURFACE or THE: STUD W .... LL AND AR£ SHCI'MII WITHIN :t 0.10 «H. 2, CEIUNG ELEVATKlNS ARE TO THE LO'to£R SURfACE OF THE CEIUNG SHEET ROC!( .t.N0 ARE SHO~ WITHIN :I: 0.10 «H. 3. FLOOR ELEV .... TIONS ARE TO THE UPP£R SlJRFAC£ Of THE FLOOR (EXCLUSIVE OF CARPETING AND ARE SHOWN WITHIN to 0.10 fEET. ,/{~~~, "',.'" "' ... ,,' '" """ .' _~ -.--80JNDARY AT LEVEL SHO\IIIN . ./ ~,/···-·~~'-Eti';t .... l!?I .'/ll~;7::l:··~~~~~,.~:o,~~~ ··~·:::-·:...._._.--'·.,:eREAK .!"{~_~·.'El.EVA~: W..-01 -:":flR~CE ,l~II.INE~:; ~ Ul.llTEO ~WDN ELalENT :"'~,:,/ t ? 10 20 4p SCALE IN FEET ........ :,-: ~ N A Soil Map-KIng County Area , Walhington o ~ ro ~ ~ ____ ~====~~ __________ ~~==========~F_ o 100 3)0 -«JO I!IOO Web SoIl Survey 2.0 National Cooperative SoIl Survey 1011512007 Page1of3 \ C) ~ 0 'P/toTO (l.l!3.\QQO) I C/) ,........J ~ Lt)« 00:: I 1 ~ ~ J J Ow C/)I-<D O ~ ~ 1"'-0:: ~ g« ~ BI 0 8 • ~ l 0 D. -CJ O CJ WZ Z ..I --..1 :1 ~O D. I ! ir ~ J J § § ! I HI ii 0 1-"11""" I . >- -f-- I-l Ir I-- I I I ] I j j I- ~ ,....0 LO:5: goo OOIl) ,....0 00 ....IN L07S0057 CAO N W* eo.n.{WlR) N - • 01IctiI NM ~ ........ WIcIIftI HeItat eon..v.tion At-. (2004) E:l ,.,.. cI PIMnIIII WeIIMd ~ (2004) 0 -_ ~/v-. BuIfw (2004) ~ I<4JI« ~ AI.-(2004) o ...... '-'SOOfMt &iQKlngc-ty Plot diItII: Oct, 1. 2007; \\ddeIOO1\IcD''''''\W_~'hM2Apr I I I I 0 w l I ..... (!) lO- ~ 00 00::: J (/)0 § ..... >- I ! }' 3:r: J Ii 0 I ~ 8 I I 0 l ..... ~ t--O ) J U'):I: ~ go... 8 lil ~ 0 s ! G C/)U') I B ~ I ~ BI t--O 00 ~ ~·~::<~D D • ...IN 0 ..... ! I ..... 0 LOI ~ ga.. J r cnN ~ ..... 0 ~ ! G I 00 ...IN B ii 0 I ~ 8 I l ~ 1'-0 LOI 80.. C/}Lt) 1'-0 00 ...JC\I j G ... '" BI ,.,,,,", 8 t l L07S0057 001 .jpg L07S0057 002 .jpg L07S0057 003 .jpg L07S0057004.jpg L07S0057 005 .jpg L07S0057006.jpg L07S0057 007 .jpg L07S0057008.jpg L07S0057009.jpg L07S0057010.jpg L07S0057011 .jpg L07S0057012 .jpg L07S0057 013 .jpg L07S0057014.jpg L07S0057015.jpg L07S0057016.jpg L07S0057017.jpg L07S0057018 .jpg L07S0057019.jpg L07S0057 020.jpg L07S0057021 .Jpg L07S0057 022 .jpg L07S0057023.jpg L07S0057024.jpg L07S0057025.jpg L07S0057026.Jpg L07S0057 027 .jpg L07S0057 028 .jpg L07S0057029.Jpg L07S0057 030.jpg L07S0057031 .Jpg L07S0057032 .jpg L07S0057 033.jpg L07S0057034.jpg L07S0057 035.jpg L07S0057 036.jpg L07S0057041 .jpg L07S0057 046 .jpg L07S0057051 .jpg L07S0057 056 .jpg L07S0057061 .jpg L07S0057066 .jpg L07S0057037.jpg L07S0057 042 .Jpg L07S0057 047 .jpg L07S0057052 .jpg L07S0057 057 .jpg L07S0057062 .jpg l p' \'(' .... "&.," "1 , , L07S0057 067 .jpg L07S0057 038.jpg L07S0057 043 .jpg L07S0057048.jpg L07S0057 053 .jpg L07S0057058 .jpg L07S0057 063 .jpg i ... · ... ' ..... ·~ .". • • • .'f' ': 'II.. :;." , .... r. ..... f '", .... : I ," . ~, .~ . • • • <i- 4 f,~~. -- L07S0057068.jpg L07S0057039.jpg L07S0057040.jpg L07S0057044.jpg L07S0057 045.Jpg L07S0057 049 .jpg L07S0057 050 .jpg L07S0057 054 .jpg L07S0057055.jpg L07S0057059.jpg L07S0057 060 .jpg L07S0057 064 .jpg L07S0057 065.jpg :.. . ..,.., .... -:0 ~ ., "-~ L07S0057 069 .jpg L07S0057 070.Jpg l07S0057071 .jpg l07S0057072.jpg l07S0057073 .jpg ,.---------------- It · ------------------------------------------------------------------, - r- • EGGF:BRECHTSHoRTPLAT WAU<WAY INVENTORY sruDY REPORT OWNER: ERVIN EGGEBRECHT 1 1044 SE 1 92ND STREET RENTON. WA 98055 AGENT: SHELLY FORD TRUVEST. LLC P.O. Box 1754 RENTON. WA 98057 PHONE 253-226-5825 FAX 253-226-8008 PREPARED By: a··· PVRAMBD ...; E NGUNEERUNG \. ... ILILC 29015 MILITARY ROAD 5 .. #544 . FEDERAL WAY. WA 98003 PHONE 253-852-1 164 FAX 253-859·2065 COpy K.C-D_D.E.S. IREV~S~ONI JANUARY 18. 200JL@ ~ § @ ~ 5 7 • 4 :~ , Eggebrecht Sholl't Plat Waikway Inventory Study Background In response to the Eggebrecht Short Plat review (Application No. L07S0057), King County staff issued a Plat Screening Transmittal that outlined a variety of issues which required additional information prior to a complete review. One of those items was an inventory of the walkways which school children would utilize. The identified schools of interest were: Lindberg High School, Nelson Middle School, and Benson Hill Elementary School. In order to define the specific limits of the study, Pyramid Engineering contacted the Renton School District on Monday, January 7, ZOOS. A staff member of the Transportation Department at the District office indicated that for the specific project, the following pedestrian routes should be evaluated: o Site to Lindberg High School bus stop, o Site to Nelson Middle School bus stop, and o Site to Benson Hill Elementary School. These locations are provided in Figure 1. On Wednesday, January 9, Pyramid Engineering inventoried the local pedestrian routes by walking the routes taking photographs at regular intervals taking note of special circumstances and measuring features which could impede or restrict pedestrian travel along the corridors. Photo numbers and directions of photo are indicated on the figure. Findings At all locations, the walkways provided a paved surface for the entire routes. For the most part, the walkways were typical cement concrete sidewalks 5-feet to 7-feet wide adjacent to a vertical concrete curb. This condition was typically found along recently developed projects, which included the full length of I OSth Avenue SE. Along SE 19Z nd Street and I 16th Avenue SE, the sidewalks were less continuous. However, where the typical sidewalks were missing, an asphalt paved shoulder was available which was S-feet to 9-feet wide from edge of paving to the fog line of the roadway. A detailed photo description of each of the pedestrian routes is provided. No permanent impediments within the walkways were identified. Page 1 of 14 I EGGEBRECHT SHORT PLAT WALKWAY INVENTORY STUDY a PYRAMID ENGINEERING LLC FIGURE 1 LOCAL AERIAL MAP Site to Lindberg High School Bus Stop at Intersection of SE 190tb Street and 1 OStb Avenue SE J..AJ""UII); South Along East Side of 10S tb Avenue SE Page 3 of 14 ~'IUJI~ South along 1 Ogth Avenue SE LQ~(iraJnt of Intersection of SE 19200 Street and 1 Ogth Avenue SE • ---j Page 4 of 14 Page 5 of 14 ftllJllI( North Side of SE 192 00 Street Toward Page 6 of 14 """'''' North Side of SE 192 nd Street Toward Site Intersection Page 7 of 14 Site to Nelson Middle School Bus Stop Page 8 of 14 Site to Benson ijm Elementary School Pm;ect intersection at SE 192 nd Street Looking East II . Intersection of 112tb Avenue SE and SE 192 nd Street Looking East Page 9 of 14 12. SE 192 nd Street Looking East Page 10 of 14 15 . Intersection of 114th Avenue SE and SE 192 nd Street Looking East Page 11 of 14 Page 12 of 14 18 . I 16th Avenue SE Looking North . . Page 13 of 14 21 116th Avenue SE Looking North at Benson Elementary School Page 14 of 14 FGGeJIRFCHT SHoRr PLAT LOT POTEN11AL sruOY REPORT OWNER: ERVIN EGGEBRECHT 1 1044 SE 192ND STREET RENTON, WA 98055 AGENT: SHELLY FORD TRUVEST, LLC P .O. Box 1754 RENTON, WA 98057 PHONE 253-226-5825 FAX 253-226-8008 PREPARED By: ri PYRAMID ENGINEERING LLC 29015 MILITARY ROAD S ., #544 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 PHONE 253852·1 1 64 FAX 253859-2065 \REvfsYON! JANUARY 1 8, 2008 L07S0057 BACKGROUND Eggebrecht (Truvest) Short Plat Lot Potential Study The Eggebrecht (Truvest) Short Plat is a 9-lot short plat proposed at 11044 SE 192nd Street (King County Application No. L07Soo57). An existing dirt! gravel road serves the existing lot and other adjacent lots. This unimproved road is situated within an existing flag lot (Mcintire -Parcel 6623400134), an access easement (over Vardeman -Parcel 6623400129), and the subject property (Eggebrecht -Parcel 6623400132). The project proposes a private road to be contained within access easements. The Plat Screening Transmittal for the project dated November 21, 2007 raises the question of whether or not more than 16 parcels could use this access. KCRS 2.06 limits the number of residences to 16 for a private street. DISCUSSION Part 1 -Determination via Granted Road Variance In 2006, a road variance was requested by the applicant from King County Traffic Engineering Section (Road Variance L06V0062) to connect the proposed private street to SE 192 nd Street. Wetlands to the north prevented a suitable access in that direction. On February 28, 2007 the variance was granted. The Road Variance Engineer, Mr. Craig Comfort, P.E. wrote in support of the variance , "The existing private gravel road will be improved to a KCRS minor access road classification. Approximately 15 lots are projected to be served by the road with future short platting of adjacent lots." A copy of the approved variance is provided in Attachment A at the end of this report. Part 2 -Determination via Short Term Perspective The Lot Potential Study map (next page) details the parcels in question. A discussion of each parcel is provided. Lot Owner : Christian. Lot size: 1.94 Acres. Zoning: R-8 Most of this parcel is wetland. Moreover, an existing public access to this parcel is provided at the northwest corner at the intersection of SE 189th Street and 111 th Place SE . An existing house does use the existing dirt road to the south. However no more homes will be allowed to access this road from this parcel. Page 1 of 7 IT ,- '~70 07.3000020 07.30000'0 07.3000030 074~ 07.3000040 Christian 0743000070 074:lOOOOl1O '~1O Mcintire ,.!6505/l52O Eggebrech I '5a5~lRCT Vardeman Herbel M234l)0131 1~1020 M2:UOO'~ Lot Owner: Mcintire. Lot size: 0.B7 Acres. Zoning: R·B This site currently has a large, pleasant home with a swimming pool, both of which consume much of the parcel area. Slopes take up the remainder of the lot. It is not a property considered "ripe" for redevelopment. For this "Short Term" scenario, it is assumed that this parcel will not subdivide further. Lot Owner: Slaughter. Lot size: O.4B acres. Zoning: R·B An existing home is located on this parcel and is adjacent to the proposed private street. It is unlikely this home would be razed in the short term. Lot Owner: Herbel. Lot size: 0.50 acres. Zoning: R·B This site has no structures on the site and is most likely the only lot that would be developed in the short term. It is highly probable that no direct access to SE 192 nd Street would be allowed forcing access to the proposed private road . Should the parcel be subdivided, dedication of the frontage along the former private street would be required. This dedication would reduce the developable size of the lot to 0.41 acres and at the allowed density of R·B only three lots could be created. This development is highly dependent on the owners of the Mcintire parcel since they have expressed no interest in dedicating or selling the flag portion of their lot for public use. Lot Owner: Vardeman. Lot size: 0.39 acres. Zoning: R·B The Vardeman parcel is situated adjacent to SE 192 M Street and the proposed private street. One large, existing home is on the lot. Should this site be redeveloped frontage improvements will be required on two sides. Along SE 192 nd Street, 12-feet of property would have to be dedicated to the public right of way . This amounts to 154'x12'=1 ,B4B sf. Along the proposed road , a minimum of 15-feet would need to be dedicated, or 130'x15'=1,950 sf. The total dedicated area would be 0.09 acres, leaving 0.3 acres to be developed. At the zoning density of R·B, only two lots could be developed in the remaining area. The cost of removing the existing home to develop two new, smaller homes with full frontage improvements would be prohibitive. Therefore it is highly unlikely that any new residences would be developed at this lot. Part 3 -Determination via Long Term Perspective This assessment is broken down into two parts : the north portion and the south portion. Lot Owner: Mcintire. Lot size: 0.B7 Acres. Zoning: R·B This site currently has a large, pleasant home with a swimming pool, both of which consume much of the parcel area. The property size includes the 15- foot wide access "flag" to SE 192 nd Street. This flag has an area of 470'x15'= 0.16 acres and grants access rights to other lots. If this flag is taken out, the developable area is 0.71 acres. In addition, the wetland buffer to the Page 3 of 7 northwest infringes on the parcel further reducing the development potential. Likely only three new lots could be developed for a total of four . Lot Owner: Slaughter. Lot size: 0 .48 acres. Zoning: R-8 An existing home is located on this parcel and is adjacent to the proposed private street. Should the parcel be redeveloped , dedication of the frontage along the former private street In the amount of 30-feet would be required. This dedication would reduce the developable size of the lot to 0.38 acres and at the allowed R-8 density only three lots could be created. Lot Owner: Herbel. Lot size: 0.50 acres. Zoning: R-8 This site has no structures on the site. With the zoning density allowed up to four lots could be developed . No direct access to SE 192 nd Street would be allowed. However , this parcel was very recently subdivided via short plat. King County Code restricts redevelopment of new parcels for a period of 5- years. Should the parcel be redeveloped, dedication of the frontage along the former private street in the amount of 30-feet would be required. This dedication would reduce the developable size of the lot to 0.41 acres and at the allowed density of R-8 only three lots could be created . Lot Owner : Vardeman. Lot size: 0.39 acres. Zoning: R-8 The Vardeman parcel is situated adjacent to SE 192 iid Street and the proposed private street. One large, existing home is on the lot. Should this site be redeveloped frontage improvements will be required on two sides . Along SE 192"" Street, 12 -feet of property would have to be dedicated to the public right of way. This amounts to 154 'x12 '=1 ,848 sf . Along the proposed road , a minimum of 15-feet would need to be dedicated , or 130'x15'=1,950 sf . The total dedicated area would be 0.09 acres, leaving 0.3 acres to be developed . At the zoning density of R-8 , only two lots could be developed in the remaining area . The cost of removing the existing home to develop two new , smaller homes with full frontage improvements would be prohibitive . Therefore it is highly unlikely that any new residences would be developed at this lot . CONCLUSIONS Road Variance The road variance granted indicates by the County's own study that no more than 15 lots will use the new road. No justification or background is provided regarding how this decision was made , but it suggests some thought was provided . Based on Part 1 -Variance of the discussion above, less than 16 residences will be served by the proposed road which would allow the use of a private road. Page 4 of 7 Short Term In a realistic scenario, the Vardeman, Christian, Mcintire, and Slaughter parcels will not subdivide further because of the lot conditions and the existing residences that exist. Only Eggebrecht and the Herbel parcels are the most obvious parcels to subdivide . Eggebrecht is proposing 1 existing plus 8 new homes. Herbel could develop up to one plus 2 new lots. The total number of homes using the road in this case is 16. This is under the threshold for requiring a public road. Long Term The long term development scenario is very speculative, especially with respect to the Mcintire site. However, based on a "worst-case," fully- developed area, a summary of the number of residences which could use the north half of this road are as follows: Christian Lot: Residences: 1 Mcintire Lot: Residences: 4 Eggebrecht Lot: Residences: 8 Subtotal 13 This suggests that in the "fully developed condition," the north half of the proposed road can be used as a private road since the number of lots is less than 17. At the south half of the road, the number of lots is also highly specuLative, but because the number of lots could exceed the threshold of 16 lots, it is treated differently. Based on a fully developed area, a summary of the number of residences which could use the south half of this road are as follows: North half: Residences: 13 Slaughter Lot: Residences: 3 Herbel Lot: Residences: 3 Vardeman Lot: Residences: 1 Eggebrecht Lot: Residences: 1 TOTAL 21 For the short term, the number of residences that will be served by the proposed private road does not exceed the threshold. Therefore a private street may be used. Although the area and zoning combine to suggest a maximum of 21 lots could be created, it is very speculative and in some cases, very unlikely. It should not be incumbent on the developer to anticipate redevelopment of existing developed parcels and to provide any more of a road than is reasonable for the subject development. Moreover, because Mcintire owns the flag access in front of all the parceLs in question and has vehemently indicated that no dedication for public use will be offered, it will be very difficult for any developer to secure the necessary right of way. For these reasons, a private road is still proposed. Palle 5 of 7 The proposed private road will include a half-street improvement section along the southerly 260-feet in conformance with the Plat Screening Transmittal. In the event either the Mcintire, Slaughter or Herbel parcels are subdivided to their full potential, the number of residences will exceed the limit of 16 and appropriate right of way will need to be dedicated at that time for the southerly portion of the road. RECOMMENDATIONS For the purposes of this analysis, a reasonable approach to the road ownership is offered. For the conditions that exist now, in all likelihood, no more than 16 lots will utilize the road. Thus a private road is allowed. It is highly unlikely that Yardman, Christian and Mcintire will subdivide. It is also unrealistic to believe Slaughter will subdivide since a home exists there now. The only "wildcard" is Herbel. Should this parcel subdivide, the two extra lots would push the number of lots accessing this road over the threshold requiring the road to be public. Since the status of the road depends on that parcel developing, and because Mcintire has vehemently expressed no dedication to the public will be allowed on her flag portion of the parcel, the issue of making the road a public road is questionable at this time. It is therefore reasonable to allow the road to be private until such time that additional subdivisions occur. At that time another analysis based on a better understanding of the subdivision conditions can be used. It is recommended that for the short term the new road be a private road , though constructed to public standards. Page 6 of 7 t .' I -:--~" Road Services Division Department of Transportation KSC-lR-Il222 201 South Jackson Street _tile, WA 98104-3856 February 28, 2007 TruvestLLC P .O . Box 1754 Renton, W A 98057 RE : Rnad Variance L06V0062 -Truvest Short Plat Dear Applicant: Thank you for your application for a variance from the King County Road Standards (KCRS). You requested a variance from Section 2 .10 of the KCRS concerning the intersection spacing for the access onto SE 192nd Street. The location at SE 19200 Street is a principal arterial for which the KCRS requires a minimum of 1,000 feet ofintenection spacing. We reviewed your proposal and agree that the existing private road extending northward at the 111 block ofSE 19200 Street is the most viable access to your site. Wetlands within sensitive areas and within County road easement obstruct potential road connections to the north of the site. The intersection spacing to the north from the private road is 375 feet to 1 13th Way SE, and to the south is 330 feet to 11 Oth Place SE . I approve the reduced intersection spacing for the proposed road improvement of the existing private road . This decision applies only to KCRS identified in the variance request . All other design requirements in the KCRS and other fq!Iliations, such as surface water management and zoning, must still be satisfied for a land use permit application. The applicant retains the rights and privileges affurded by King County Code and adopted Public Rules pertaining to road . variance processing (KCC 14.42, PUT 10-2). This variance decision is valid for one year from date ofletter unless an associated land use permit is pending or submitted within the one year period . In these cases, the variance decision is valid for the duration of the permit processing . .. TruvestLLC February 28 , 2007 Page 2 A copy of staff's analysis, findings, and conclusions is enclosed . If you have any questions, please call Craig Comfort, Road Variance Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, at 206-263-6109. Sincerely, 72~JtlvPl~ Paulette Nonnan, P .E. County Road Engineer PN:CC :kc cc: James Sanders, P _E., Development Engineer, Land Use Services Division (LUSD), Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) Pete Dye P .E., Senior Engineer, LUSD, DDES Linda Dougherty, Division Director, Road Services Division (RSD), Department of Transportation (DOT) Matthew Nolan, P .E., County Traffic Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT Fatin Karl, P.E., Supervising Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT Kris Langley, Senior Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT Craig Comfort, P.E., Road Variance Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT · __ ._---_ .. _---------._-- I I i ® Kine Count)' Road Servlootl DlviIIlon Departmeot of'hanapotudon TtaIIic:_ .. _ IdS KSCTR-02H 201 South Jaebon Blt"O&t So_,tl., WA 98104 February 28, 2007 TO: Variance File FM: CTaig Comfort, P .E., Road Variance Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section RE : Road Variance L06V0062 -Truyest Short Plat Applicant's Presentation: L The proposed Trovest Short Plat is for nine lots on an existing private street extending north off the King County principal arterial ofSE I92nd Avenue. The private gravel road is 375 feet west of I13th Way SE and serves five homes. A private road to the west, 1 10th Place SE is 330 feet from the proposed short plat access road (the existing gravel road). The King County Road Standards (KCRS) requires 1,000 feet of intersection spacing along a principal arterial. 2. There is no viable alternative access to the short plat. The existing gravel road access is in private road easements. A thirty-foot public road easement extends from lIlth Place SE to the northwest corne£ of the proposed short plat However, several wetlands within the easement area block any road OOlUleCtion. To the west of the public easement is a tract owned by King County as access to a pond. The tract also is encumbered with private access easements and the easement holders will DOt permit a road within the tract 3. The existing private gravel road will be improved to a KCRS minor access road classification. APProximately 15 lots are projected to be served by the road with future short platting of adjacent lots. Staff's Findings and Conclusions: 1. Concurrence with the applicant's presentation. The wetlands to the DOrth and the limited road easement width of30 feet all but preclude a road colUleCtiOQ. 2. The entering sight distance at the access point to SE 192nd Street exceeds KCRS minimums. ! ' I ~ r " ., i ~ ~ .. I !I II '" 3 ~ ~I r j.. S Cl ~ ~ il l & wI. t. , , It II III \ .... 'f 1 i :r "'~,,, 0lIl4 ... I: • --\ (Ioltar ICl¥llL£ ••• 10 '",. [Sf. 2-5 -1117. I ~ I The Riley Group Inc. I I WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT I TRUVEST SHORT PLAT I 11044 SE 192 nd Street RENTON, WA I I June 26, 2007 I PREPARED BY: I The Riley Group, Inc. 17522 Bothell Way NE I Bothell, W A 98011 I PREPARED FOR: I Truvest, LLC c/o Gary Watts P.O. Box 1754 I Renton, W A 98057 ; I RGI PROJECT No. 2007-070 I I IL([))7§«J)((])57 ffij rn © rn ~ w rn [Q) AUG 20 2007 I Serving the Pacific Northwest K.C. D.D.E.S. MAIN OFFICE: 17522 BOTHELL WAY NE, BOTHELL, WA 98011 I TEL (425) 415-05510 FAX (425) 415-0311 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF REPORT ....................................................................................... 2 1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 BACKGROUND RESEARCH ........................................................................................................................ .4 2. WETLAND D ELINE A TION .......................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 VEGETATION ............................................................................................................................................ .4 2.1.1 Table I. Plant Indicator Codes ........................................................................................................... .4 2.2 SOILS ........................................................................................................................................................ .4 2.3 HyDROLOGy .............................................................................................................................................. 5 2.4 WETLAND RATINGS .................................................................................................................................. .5 3. INVENTORY INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................... 5 4. WETLAND STUDY RESUL TS ...................................................................................................................... 5 4.1 VEGETATION ............................................................................................................................................. 5 4.2 SOILS ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 4.3 HyDROLOGy .............................................................................................................................................. 7 5. WETLAND DETERMINATION ................................................................................................................... 7 6. WETLAND RATING ...................................................................................................................................... 7 7. REPORT LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................................... 7 A P PEN D I X A: WET LAN D D A T A FOR M S ....................................................................... 1 A P PEN D I X B: WET LAN D RAT I N G FOR M ................................................................... 6 A P PEN D I XC: SIT E P LAN ........................................................................................................... 14 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1. Introduction and Purpose of Report This report presents the findings of a wetland detennination perfonned by The Riley Group for a short plat application of an 84,506 square foot (1.95 acres) parcel (the "subject site"). The property is located at 11044 SE 192nd Street, Renton, WA, (Unincorporated King County), Parcel 6623400132 (Figure 1). In response to communication from King County DDES, the scope of work was to perfonn a wetland detennination and delineation on the adjacent parcel to the north, Parcel 2698200220; pennission was granted by the adjacent property owner to enter the site. The "study area" was the wetland edge adjacent to the subject site; a delineation of the entire off-site wetland boundary was not perfonned. Accordingly, the southern edge of a Category III wetland was delineated on the parcel to the north; the buffer of this wetland extends onto the subject site. No on-site wetland analysis was requested by King County and thus was not perfonned pursuant to this project. Figure 1: Vicinity and Critical Areas Map I I I I I I H I I I H I I I I 10 I II 1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION The site is nearly level and primarily grassland. A home is located at the south end of the site and several out-buildings and scattered vehicles are present. The adjacent site, i.e. the study area, is forested along its southern property boundary. Figure 2: Aerial Photograph I R I o I I I I I I I I • I 1.2 BACKGROUND RESEARCH No streams or wetlands were mapped on the King County GIS Critical Areas Maps, as shown on Figure I. 2. Wetland Delineation 2.1 VEGETATION Vegetation was evaluated across the adjacent site to the north to determine the presence of hydrophytic plant communities. Plant communities are considered hydrophytic when more than 50 percent of the dominant species in the plant community have a wetland indicator status of facultative (FAC+, FAC, & FAC-), facultative wetland (FACW+, FACW, & FACW-), or obligate wetland (OBL), as listed in the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands, Region 9 -Northwest (Reed, 1993 and 1988). The indicator codes for plant species are noted in Table I. 2.1.1 TABLE 1. PLANT INDICATOR CODES Indicator Code Frequency of Occurrence in Wetlands Obligate Wetland (OBL) -occur almost always in wetlands >99% Facultative Wetland (FACW*) -usually occur in wetlands 67-99% Facultative (FAC» -equally likely to occur in wetlands or 34-66% non-wetlands Facultative Upland (FACU*) -usually occur in non-wetlands 1-34% Obligate Upland (UPL) -occur almost always in non-wetlands <1% Not Listed (NL) -no indicator status --- * Note: FACW, FAC, and FACU also have + and -values to represent species near the wetter end of the spectrum (+) and species near the drier end of the spectrum (-). Dominant species were recorded as species compnsmg more than 20 percent of the plant community in each stratum (tree, shrub, and/or herb layer). 2.2 SOILS Anaerobic (saturated) conditions cause soils to form certain characteristics that can be observed in the field. Hydric indicators include: the presence of a matrix chroma of I or less in unmottled soil or 2 or less in mottled soil, gleyed soil, organic soils (peats and mucks), and the accumulation of sulfidic material. Soil pits were dug in each data point, using a shovel to depths of 16 to 18 inches below ground surface (BGS). Soils textures were characterized using Natural Resources Conservation Service protocol, and examined for hydric indicators as described by the Washington State Manual. Soil colors were identified using a Munsell soil color chart (Kollmorgen Corporation, 1988). Depth of soil saturation was recorded for each data point. Wetland Data Sheets are included in Appendix A. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Several secondary data points were examined across the wetland/upland boundary in order to determine the approximate boundary line, although data forms were not completed at the secondary data points. The secondary data points were used to examine similarities or differences in soils between major data points and to establish mapped soil unit boundaries. 2.3 HYDROLOGY At each data point, observations of direct and indirect wetland hydrology indicators were evaluated and recorded. Under normal conditions, hydrologic indicators are used to detennine if the hydrology is either currently present or can be inferred from the guidelines provided in the Washington State Manual. These indicators include: recorded data, visual observation of inundation or saturation, watermarks, drift lines, sediment deposits, drainage patterns, local soil survey data, oxidized root channels, and water-stained leaves. 2.4 WETLAND RATINGS Wetlands, where present, were classified according to King County Code (KCC) 21A.24.3l8 Wetlands -categories. as follows: A. Wetlands are classified into category I. category II. category III and category IV based on the adopted Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington. Washington state department of ecology publication number 04-06-025. published August 2004. 3. Inventory Information The King County GIS Sensitive Areas maps do not indicate any wetlands or streams on or within 100-feet of the subject site (Figure I). 4. Wetland Study Results 4.1 VEGETATION The study area, located on the adjacent parcel to. the north, is. dominated by red alder (Alnus rubra) and black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera) in the overstory; some western red cedar (Thuja plicata) is also present. Within wet areas represented by DPI, Scouler's willow (Salix scouleriana), salmonberry (Rubus spectabi/is) and Douglas spirea (Spiraea douglasii) codominate in the shrub layer; Himalayan blackberry (Rubus procerus) is common. Slough sedge (Carex obnupta) is also present. This is a hydrophytic plant community. In the forested upland, the shrub layer is dominated by Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis); Himalayan blackberry dominates in the understory. Swordfern (Polystichum munitum) and Pacific blackberry (Rubus ursin us) co-dominate in the groundlayer. This is a non-hydrophytic plant community. 4.2 SOILS The site is mapped on the Web Soil Survey as AgC CAlderwood gravelly sandy loam 6 -15% slopes), as shown on Figure 3. The Alderwood series is a non-hydric soil made up of moderately well drained soils that have a weakly consolidated to strongly consolidated substratum at a depth of 24 to 40 inches. Typically, these soils are on uplands. They are formed under conifers, in glacial deposits. In a representative profile, the surface layer and subsoil are very dark brown, I I I I I I I I I I I D I I o I I I dark-brown, and grayish-brown gravelly sandy loam about 27 inches thick. The substratum is grayish-brown, weakly consolidated to strongly consolidated glacial till that extends to a depth of 60 inches and more. Some small depressional areas mapped as Alderwood soils are inclusions of the poorly drained Bellingham, Seattle, Tukwila, and Shalcar soils. Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil in Alderwood soils and very slow in the substratum. Water moves on top of the substratum in winter. Soil on the adjacent site at DP2 within the upland forest was 10YR 3/2 unmottled loam. This soil generally matched the mapped series and is considered non-hydric. At DPI, soil was black (IOYR 3/1) muck to 9 inches underlain by mottled I OYR 412 fine sandy loam to 14+ inches. This soil generally matches the Tukwila series. The Tukwila series is made up of very poorly drained organic soils that formed in decomposing sedges, rushes, grasses, and shrubs. These hydric soils are in wet basins of upland depressions and on stream bottoms. In a representative profile, dominantly black to very dark brown muck extends to a depth of 60 inches or more. There is a seasonal high water table at or near the surface. SOIL SURVEY OF KING COUNTY AREA. WASHINGTON --==fi=;;:;;==~Mr..1'J. 0-~.j 100 200 0 H50 300 "" .r;:WlOo~' P'plof' Figure 3: Soil Map (Age: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 -15% slopes) D I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4.3 HYDROLOGY Wetland hydrology indicators, i.e. soil saturation to the surface, were observed as DPI near the wetland edge. No indicators were observed at DP2 in the forested upland. An ornamental pond has been constructed within the northern end of the wetland. A constructed ditch apparently serves as an overflow device; a detailed evaluation was not conducted of these features. 5. Wetland Determination Based upon the presence of all three wetland indicators, a wetland is present on the adjacent parcel to tile north. The southern boundary of the wetland was delineated and surveyed and is shown on the site plan in Appendix C. 6. Wetland Rating The wetland rates Category III using Version 2 of the Wetland Rating Form for Western Washington, Appendix B. Category III wetlands within Urban Areas of King County are protected with a standard 75-foot buffer width. As shown on the Site Plan (Appendix C), no modifications to this buffer widili are proposed. 7. Report Limitations Work for this project was performed, and iliis report prepared for, Gary Watts and his authorized representatives in accordance with generally accepted professional practices. This report is not meant to represent a legal opinion. No oilier warranty, expressed or implied, is made. If you have any question regarding this report or its findings, please call us at (425) 415·0551, or contact us by fax at (425) 415-0311. Sincerely, ~'''C fi " Celeste Botha , Senior Wetland Ecologist Report Distribution: Pau . Riley, LG, LHG President Gary Watts, Truvest, LLC (4 copies) 1---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) I'roj~tlSite: Pozrcd _ :26q ?;2.{)O'd-:;;;z.O -.4/ 8t-~ .•• ~ --- Applicant/owner: (Thu/'e~f-Sf> ~ InvC'stie:nor( s): Ci30 eM ' Do Nnnnal CircumslancC'$ exisc on lbe site':" o.to: County: SI:lle: srrlR: Communi,,· [0: Is the ~ite signi fienntl)' di:tturbed (at)'Pi~ situation l? Is the orea a potenti.1 Problem Area? Exolonution of arvoical or oroblem are.: Tr:'nsect 10: ,[)p-7 Piol 10: I'tJ.LJv \,(i/ L Ip VEGEIA TION (For stram, indic.te T = tree: S = shrub: H = herb: V = vine) Domin.nt PI.nt Seecies Smuum '* CQ\·er IAhw rr.ttr T :;'0 haJc Po;Ou --,-!)'" ! ---rJ' . I). ~ 10 i Vv.,t1 /p</."C: '~'>.i~::F . ....,j/ , " , . r i Jf] -.. I' .~(t:~· /"""~~ ......... /1 ___ , .. .I ...,,' ,'" , . O}~~~':J: .. ,--5 d.e) .;:\ .. C./j .. lf~ • .. i "un 0 po • r.; /~ H\'DROPHYTlt! VEGETA 110S INDICA TORS: 9C of dominantS OBL FACW. &. FAC It)O Check ~I indk",ors Ih.t .pply & oxpl:'in below: Indic.tor Dominant PI.nl Seeci .. FIrL--~ A-; ~,<" f'CJ6 f7t-c--U",l[ Ii, ~ Fftc FA-C.. FAOrl PAc.-- Stratum v' H Visual obse""t!on of pl3/lt species gro\\ing in Physiologicollrepmductive 3daptotions areas of prolonged inund3tionlsiltum(ion __ \\",.etland plant database ~ co,'er IS- .5 Morphologic.1 3d.ptotio.. __ Porsonol knowled:e of region.1 pl.nt communities lndit:310r ~ OBL ~~~~~h~n~ic~~~L~it~~~w~~~ ____________ ~~~~~==~ __ ~cn~h.~r~(~e~~~1w~'~nL} ______________________________ -=== __ ~1 Hydrophytic veeeration present? ( fy.s ) no Rotionale for decisionIRemorks: ~ HYDROLOGY Is it the growin, ... son? . SJ no :n.ter Marks: ye. ® S.din~nl ""posi~ ftD_ Based on; ~SOil temp (~cord temp ___ ) Drift Lines; ye.( &l) Orain.ge Pane ... : yes ~ ~~~~-=~~~O~t~ho~r~(!ex~DII~ai~n~I~~~ __________ ~~~~~~~~ ___ '-/~ __ ~~ ""pt, 'of inund.tion; ...1:::2::-inche5 Oxidized Root (Ii'A.,.rootS) Local Soil Survey: yes ~ Depth to free waler in pit: Deolh to saturated soil: -D-jnch~s inches Check all that apply & expl.in below: Sueam. Lake or ga,. dala: __ _ Aerial oholoeraoh.: Wedand hydrology present? Rationale for decisioniRemarks: Channels < 12 in! yo's) no 1.-/ FAC Neutral: . yes ~ W.tor"5t:lin.d l.ea\'~ no Other (explain): Other: DO 1------------------------ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SOILS Map Unit Name Atw~ cJS L (Series &: Phase I Taxonomv (sub rou ) Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Monle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell mOist) moist) 6~q A-/oy,~3// 1-//-;'1-8 /OY«.. 4/J-"lei- Hydric Soillndicators: (check all that apply) __ Histosol __ . _ Histic Epipedon __ Sulfidic Odor __ Aquic Moisture Regim: ~educing Conditions Oleved or Low-Chronu (= I) matrix Hydric soils present?5eJ no IUtionaJe for decisionlRemarlt5: Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? j no Hydric soils present? no Wetland h\"droloev Dresent? no RationaieIRemarks: --c7 . . NOTES, DP-I Drainage Class '-. _______ _ Field observations confirm Yes ;\lollle abund,mce Texture. concretions. Drawing of soil size &:. contraSt structUre. elC. pralik C mat£b ~e~,rimiQn, -fs L , ---L.. Matrix chroma S 2 with mollies __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surf:ICC L3~'er or Sandy Soils __ Organic Stre3king in Sandy Soils __ Listed on :-1ationa1lLoc:ll Hydric Soils List Other (exDlain in remarks) c3 Is the sampling point no within a wetland? - Revised 4197 1- 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I SOILS Map Unit Same !H ~zJSl (12 C) (Series & Phase) Drainage Class ________ _ Field observations conflrm 6' ~ No manned tvne? Ta"(onomv (sub!!rouo) Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color MOllie colors ~lollk abund:lnce Texture. concretions. Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure. etc. profile moist) moist) I match d~cdlltjoD' o-f !r Ii) 11Z ~/::r -(LIJ -S~ . '6. ! /p.j-.'0 IMp-.. ~/3 VVO I Hydric Soil Indieators: (check all that apply) __ Histosol __ Matrix chroma S; 2 with moales __ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ Sulfidic Odor __ High Orpnic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Organic Stre:lldng in Sandy Soils __ Reducing Conditions __ Listed on ="ationaVLocal Hydric S"ils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (exDlain in'remarks) Hydric soils present? yes -~' Rationale for decision/Remarks: Wetland Detennlnation (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes ~ @ Hydric soils present? yes Is the sampling point yes Wetland h\'droloS!v Dresent? ves within a wetland? RationalelRemarks: 'r r' ; , t / A 1.0 . SF-drn wo¥r d ,? '.t/."" ../] ff? e;. -I -'1/ "'t.. ....... ,.... ~:'" .Cf .' Oc.~'-·~·C [':. (,'r'~ -' 7'-'- rJ.J '1"/ p~d +0 . !Jh,,/ rMI ( ;. ~./ , .' , - NOTES: Revised 4/97 I ------------------------ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ptoj •• tlSite: ::' i' App1icantlO\lo1\er: , In'-eitic3to"5); DATA FORM I (Revised) Routine Wetland Detenninalion (W.-\ State Wedand Delineation Manual or 1987 COrDS Wedand Delineation • anUB I M I :2 ~ '1 ?5:J-OO ~-;J-O _ /tI ~I- -Tr~- t'R:o~ SP Date:: 3/C)..CfI07- County: f:=.-' ~t3te: :J SfTlR; Do Normal Circumst~nce~ <xist on the site? @ no Communit~· 10: DP-2 Is the !:ite signific:mtly di:.1utbed (.il.typic:U sil~tion I~ y~ ~ Tr>ns""t 10: Is the area a potential Problem Area~ yes PtolIO: I') ExDla.ation of alVDic", or oroblem ar .. : '1 WI/.--I-II VE!.!EI~IIQ~ (For $lram, indicate T == tree: S = shrub; H ;;: herb; V c:: v~ne) - / Domin~nl Pl~nl 50ecies St~tum <k cover Indiearor Dominant Planr Soecies SlroIum Ck co\'er Indicator ,q J'lA' BW r /fo FA-C AliA n;,}yy T tj-o F~ () eA'Yli.--~ ..s X5' F/tCL{ 10, d-,. , dJAe..-V 70 F/t:4. fn~ '-'." , H 10 Ilk&<. "Rttk-wry;. V -;;;.s-F11G- HYDROPH\'TIC \'EGETA nos 1:'l;1>ICA TORS: % of dominants OBL. FACW. oS: FAC :J-/ fe 0;;:-33 Check all indicators rhat appl)' &: .. pl~i. below: - -- :, .:8isual obsen"ndon of pl:lnI speC'ies gTO",,"ing in Physiolo~icalJreproducti"'e adaptations --.... : .. , areas of prolon2ed inundJ.tion/s61tur.ltion --\\"~tland plant database --'. -MorpholOSic~1 adapt.llions --Personal tnowlcdgc of region.J1 plant ct'Immunities -Technical Literature Other (e~olain) -' Hyd",phytk vqetation present? yes ~ Rationale for,decisionIRemarks: '-// .. /.' -- HYDROLQ6l: 4" ~ l· -IS it ih. growin2 sc~50n? e no Water Marl<s: ye5~ Sediment Oc~it" ye~ -• l-on B";ed on:Jdi,; soi/lemp (record lemp ) Drift Li ... : ye.s ~) Dr.;a.inlge P3nerfs: yes(hg) oth .. (exDI.inl ...... Dept. "of inundation: ---inches -O.idized Root (li'-.,:~ Channels < 12 in_ .es, ' - Local Soil Survey; y .. ~ Depth 10 m:e .. -ater in pic: --' -=-inches FAC Neutral: -yes 0V/' Wattt-stained Le3\'CS yeS~ Ocmh 10 saturated soil; " =--' inches Check an that apply ~ explain below: Other (explain): , Stream. Lake or gag~ dara: __ Aerial ohotorraohs: Other: - Wedand bydroloGY present? yes b , I Rationale for decisionIRemark5: I ,-------.. ----.. ---.. --.-.. --...... . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Wetland name or number WETLAND RATING FORM -WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2 ~ Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among user.; Name of wetland (if known): 7rl~ .;; r Date of site visit: 3jJ-9 II) 7- 73tJ fttfj Trained by Ecology? Yes ~o_ Date of training 2/t;/o 5 Rated by SEC: Jb TWNSHP: ;;).0 RNGE:.2.-Is SfflR in Appendix D? Yes_ No~ Map of wetland unit: Flgure..!:!..-Estimated size Z;.<;A-c..- SUMMARY OF RATING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland I II. mL IV_ Category I = Score >=70 Category 11 = Score 51-69 Category TIl = Score 30-50 Category IV = Score < 30 ----' Score for Water Quality Functions Score for Hydrologic Functions Score for Habitat Functions TOTAL score for Functions Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland I 11_ Does not Applyv' /0 Final Category (choose the "highest" category from above) 1'-111-1 Summary of basic information about the wetland unit . WetiandUllitha.Special Wetland·HGMCl:iss··.· Cbaraeterls=tics=-______ +--+'=:--=.u."'ed=.,:ft"'or:....o:Ra=ti!!"<>-_-j--,l Estuarine De ressional NatoraIHe-r~it~a-e~W~e~tl~a-n~d---+~~~~~~----~~ Bog. Mature Forest Old Growt;;-h"'F;;.o-r-es-:t------1--!-2F1;;a"'t"'s'--------I---i Coastal La=oo"'n"-_____ -+-I..:F"'r..::es"'h"'w;,,:a::t::;:erc..T.o.i:.:d:::a:.,1 __ -+--1 Interdunal '--------~~-------------~~ None of the above Check if unit has multiple HOM classes resent Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 August 2004 ,..-------_. __ ._. __ ..•..... _ ... Wetland name or number D Depressional and Flats Wetlands WATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS -Indicators that the wetland unit functions to improve water 'quality D D 1. Does the wetland unit have the Ilotential to improve water quality? D 1.1 Characteristics ofsurfuce water flows out of the wetland: D Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points ~ 3 Unit has an intennittently flowing, OR highly constricted pennanently flowing outlet points = 2 Unit has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted. surface outlet (parmanently flowing) points = I Unit is a "flat" depression (Q. 7 on key), or in the Flats class, with pennanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch points = 1 (if ditch is not permanently flowing treat unit as "infermiltel1fly flowing") Provide photo or drawinQ S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface (or duff layer) is clay or organic (us. NRCS D definitions) YES points ~ 4 NO Doints ~ 0 D 1.3 Charncterlstics of persistent vegetation (emergent. shrub. andlor forest Cowardin class) D Wetland has persistent. ungrazed, vegetation> = 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent. ungrazed, veget.tion > = 112 of area points =3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation > ~ 1110 of area points ~ I Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation <1/10 of are. points ~ 0 Mao of Cowardln vecetation classes DI.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation. D This is the area a/the wetland unit that is ponded/or at least 2 months, but dries out sometime during the year. Do not cOWlI the area that is permanently ponded. Estimate area as the average condition 5 oul 0/10 yrs. Are. seasonally ponded is> Y, total area of wetland points ~ 4 Area seasonally ponded is> ';' total area of wetland points ~ 2 Area seasonally ponded is < V. total area of wetland points ~ 0 Map of Hydroperiods D Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above D 2. Does the wetland unit have the ollnortunity to improve water quality? D Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgmdient from the wetland. Note which of the foUowillg conditions provide the sources a/pollutants. A unit may have poIlutants coming/rom several sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity. -Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft -Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland -Tilled fields or orchards within 1501\ of wetland - A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas. residential areas, L farmed fields. roads, or clear--cut logging Residential. urban areas. golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland -Wetland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen -Other YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is I D TOTAL -Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from D 1 by D2 Add score 10 lable on p. I Wetland Rating Fonn -western Washington version 2 5 August 2004 I Points (only 1 Bcore per box) (seep.38) I FIgure_ I / I 1 I FIgure_ I 5 FIgure_ I I 2. I -----I I 2-I ---~.-(seep. 44) I I I multiplier 'l I --- 2tt I I I I I I I I I I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I --_._----------- Wetland name or number D Depressional and Flats Wetlands HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS -Indicators that the wetland unit functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation D 3. Does tbe wetland unit have the I!otential to reduce flooding and erosion? D D 3.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland unit Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points =4 Unit has an intermittently flowing, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points = 2 Unit is a "flat" depression (Q. 7 on key), or in the Flats class, with permanent surface outflow and DO obvious natural outlet andlor outlet is a man-made ditch points = 1 (If ditch is not permanently flowing Ireat lInit as "lntermiffenl{V flawing") Unit has an unconstricted or slightlv constricted surface outlet (oermanenllv flawing) Doints = 0 D D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods Estimate the height ofpondingabove the hollom o/the outlet, For units with no outlet measure from the surface of permanent water or deepest part (if dry). Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland" points "" 5 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or hottom of outlet points =-5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 Unit is flat (yes to Q. 2 or Q. 7 on key) but has small depressions on the surtace that trap watcr points = 1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft -'points ~ 0 D D 3.3 Contribution of wetland unit to storage in the watershed Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area o/the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of unit points ~ 5 The area of the basin is IOta 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire unit is in the FLATS class points ~ 5 D Totul for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above D D 4. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? Answer YES if the unit is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage, or reduction in water velocity. it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive andlor erosive flows. Answer NO if the water coming into the wetland is controlled by a structure such as flood gate, tide gate, flap valve9 reservoir etc. OR you estimate that more than 90% of the water in the wetland is from groundwater in areas where damaging groundwater flooding does not occur. Note which o/the/ollowing indicators ojnpportllnityapply, -Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems -Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems -Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface nmoffwater that might otherwise flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems -Other YES mUltiplier is 2 (NO) multiplier is 1 D TOTAL -Hydrologic FUDctions Multiply the SCOre from D 3 by D 4 Add score to table on p. 1 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 6 August 2004 Points (only 1 score per box) (seep.46) 1- / ) ----- I ~ I r;;;;'49j multiplier I D Wetland name or number Tii~se·questions apply to wetlands o/all HGM classes. Points HABITAT FUNCTIONS -Indicators that unit functions to provide important habitat (only I score per box) H 1. Docs tbe wetland unit bave tbe I!otential to provide babitat for many species? H L.l Vegetation structure (see p. 72) Figure_ Check the types ql"vegetation classes present (as defined by Cowardin)-Size threshold/or each class is ~ acre or more than 10% of the area if W1it is smaller than 2.5 acres. ~quaticbed Emergent plants ~crub/Shrub (areas where shrubs have >30% cover) __ Forested (areas where trees have >30% cover) \L unit has a/orested class check if: The forested class has 3 out of5 strata (canopy. sub-canopy. shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground.cover) that each cover 20% within the forestOirjiOIygoo Add the number of vegetation structures that qualifY. If you have: 4 structures or more points = 4 Map of Cowardin vegetation classes 3 structun:s points=2 2-2 structures points = 1 I structure points = 0 H 1.2. Hydroperiods (see p. 73) Figure_ Check the types o/waler regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The waler regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or ~ acre to count. (see text for descriptions 0/ hydroperiods) l71ermanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present points = 3 ~easonallY flooded or inundated 3 !YQes eresenL points = 2 -71:ccasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present point = I __ Saturated only I type present points = 0 __ Pennanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland __ Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland 2-__ Lake...tringe weiland = 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland = 2 points Map of hydroperiods H 1.3. Richness ofrlant Species (see p. 75) Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft'. (different patches a/the same species can be combined to meetlhe size threshold) You do nol have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Mil/oil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian Thistle If you counted: > ,19 species points = 2 List species below if you want to: 5 -19 sEecies points = 1 < 5 species points = 0 / Total for page ~ Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 13 August 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Wetland name or number H 1.4. (nterspersion of habitats (see p. 76) Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowarcljn vegetation classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high~ medium. low, or none. None = 0 points Low =-1 point Moderate = 2 points cf~ ~ [riparian braided channels] High = 3 points NOTE: Tfyou have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water the ratio is alwa s ·'hi h". Use rna of Cowardin ve etation classes H 1.5. Special Habitat Features: (see p. 77) Check the habitatfeatures that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the ~ number o/points you put into Ihe next column. '; arge, downed, woody debris within the wetland (>4in. diameter and 6 ft long). _\ _Staoding snags (diameter at the bottom> 4 inches) in the wetland __ Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2m) andlor overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft (1m) over a stream (or ditch) in. or contiguous with the unit, forat least 33 ft (10m) __ Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrobs or trees that have not yet turned greylbrown) __ At least 'h acre ofthin·stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are pennanently or seasonally inundated(structuresfor egg·laying by amphibians) __ Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in each stratum of plants Igure_ NOTE: The 20% staled in early printings of the manual on page 78 is 01' error. ~--------------~~~~~--~~~--~~~~---HI. TOTAL Score -potential for providing habitat q I L-____________ A'"-d"'d:.;t"'h::..e"'sc"'o.:..:re"'s=o"'mC!H.:.;J:.:..i:....-'.H,..,J-'".2:!.,"-,H"-J""3,,,, H=J."'4,'-'H.:.;I"'.5'--"-____ 1 Comments Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 14 August 2004 Wetland name or nwnber H 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportuuity to provide habitat for many species? H2.1 Buffers (seep. 80) FIgur8_ Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer a/wetland unit. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See text/or definition of "undisturbed. " -100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open waler >95% of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no-grazing, no landscaping, no daily human use) Points = 5 -100 m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water> 50% circumference. Points;;;; 4 -50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% circumference. Points I::: 4 -100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water> 25% circumference, . Points;:;: 3 -50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for> 50% circumference. Points:;::; 3 If buffer does not meet any or tbe criteria above -No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft) of wetland > 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 -No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >50% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. PoiDts = 2 -Heavy grazing in buffer. Points = 1 -Vegetated buffers are <lm wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% oflhe circumference (e.g. tilled . /fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points = O. I 5L Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points = 1 Aerial photo showing buffers H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (see p. 81) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated canidor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide. has at least 30% cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads,paved roads, are considered breaks in the co"idor). YES = 4 points (go to H 2.3) NO = go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at leasl50ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries. other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake-fringe wetland, ifit does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? YES = 2 points (go to H 2.3) NO = H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 Is the wetland: within 5 mi (8kro) of a brackish or salt water estuary OR o. within 3 mi ofa large field or pasture (>40 acres) OR within I mi of a iake greater than 20 acres? YES = I point NO = 0 points Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 15 Total for page_l_ August 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Wetland name or number H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the one description o/the landscape around the wetland that best fits)(see p. 84) There are at least 3 other wetlands within Y2 mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed (light grnzing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields, or other development. pointli= 5 The wetland is Lake·fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within ~ mile points = 5 There are at least 3 other wetlands within ~ mile, BUT the connections between them are disturbed points = 3 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetland within 1,.4 mile points:= 3 There is at least I wetland within Y, mile. points = 2 There are no wetlands within lh: mile. points = 0 H 2. TOTAL Score -opportunity for providing habitat Add the score.fro!'. H2.1 H2.2 ID.3, H2.4 TOTAL for H I from page 14 Total Score for Habitat Functions -add the points for H I, H 2 and record the result on Wetland Rating Fenn -western Washington version 2 17 p. I August 2004 D ----- I I I -----q ----- ID I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i0-1 I i I 1 1 I I I ,. :;:~ Ie 'j " Iii ~s I I I I Il ,! 1 I Ie I I \~-- I· , r:'~£l-;~,; .. \--'II!I il :1 , '5 , i' ¥ 22 • 'r--:. ~~; ,t~---i-"''''''"'+''j;&.""'--;F7n'--~ :~a J_. Ii I; i ., ;. > n ~!i , , i ',' , ' I I -r I '. (--..\ \ ...., / • I!, -::- I • .:-' -, - I I I -\1 r l ' J 81 ! I -I I " I --__ I" -"., Ii " .... , ',:. .-..... :: :-, .. '. , ~ ". -, I \ \ ~ J ,~ !:t--~"-' _/ , . , . '. /:'t~O""'~"-~ )1.~' I I r . =:;}t:~,:SG~'---:.:;.;-r----,L. .... ~~.:: ,: ," ':'.--~::, :: 'I , ·1 .. ', I , I I I .... ..-",'.', I ... ~ , '1~' ~ , ------.. ~------- .... ,'\.-S,E. .,192nd St ',' ~ ... ,/ .. ' '.1 " .. ~// , , , , o I \/ /' z { , ttl .;; ~, , j ! ,0 ; ,: , '. :, ~iI j ., \ I • I ! , • I i , ! , I B ,\ , ;; , ,; EGGEBRECHT SHORT PLAT 11044-SE 192ND ST. RENTON 98055 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON I I ___ ,"~"V~~«"'7u'~"Wrl"F·~l~«:.~>-rr.~ '-'_"«11£,--:,;;';;("",411'" ''',df?hll'''4i/' '''''lIftj?' 4WZ'¢h *' ~:) "4f:;i1'" JP:r;·. -,;"Jz: . 41ft ~ tWt',' ,.wi> 11 , j/{qJM J~7 "41"', / I I ""'q;:'~ /1;;"~,,,,,1 '4" ",""$,,,/ / I I I I I I I I I I I THE RILEY GROUP, INC. I GEOTECHNICAL· ENVIRONMENTAL· WETLAND SERVICES I Serving the Pacific Northwest I Main Office: 17522 Bothell Way NE, Suite A' Bothell, WA 98011 • Tel (425r~~5Fg5~1' !'l1'J;!2~ 415-0311 Ii' rT\\ ~ rrt ~:~~ley-Group,com li% b (0 ~ U W 15 ill) lJ:::l \w V(f C2J ~ \VJ QJ) . () AUG 2 0 2007 I I ~ I The Riley Group Inc . • I I WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT TRUVEST SHORT PLAT I 11044 SE 192 nd Street RENTON, WA I I June 26, 2007 I PREPARED BY: I The Riley Group, Inc. 17522 Bothell Way NE I Bothell, W A 98011 I PREPARED FOR: I Truvest, LLC c/o Gary Watts P.O. Box 1754 I Renton, W A 98057 I RGI PROJECT NO. 2007-070 I I lLij7§(Q)(Q)51 ~@©~~W~[Q) AUG 20 2007 I Serving the Pacific Northwest K.C. D.D.E.S. MAIN OFFICE: 17522 BOTHELL WAY NE, BOTHELL, WA 98011 I TEL (425) 415-0551 0 FAX (425) 415-0311 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF REPORT ....................................................................................... 2 1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 BACKGROUND RESEARCH ........................................................................................................................ .4 2. WETLAND DELINEATION ..................................................................................................................•....... 4 2 .1 VEGETATION ............................................................................................................................................ .4 2.1.1 Table 1. Plant Indicator Codes ............................................................................................................ 4 2.2 SOILS ........................................................................................................................................................ .4 2.3 HyDROWGy .............................................................................................................................................. 5 2.4 WE1LANDRATINGs ................................................................................................................................... 5 3. INVENTORY INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................... 5 4. WETLAND STUDY RESULTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 4.1 VEGETATION ............................................................................................................................................ .5 4.2 SOILS ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 4.3 HYDROWGy .............................................................................................................................................. 7 5. WETLAND DETERMINATION ...............................................................................•................................... 7 6. WETLAND RATING ...................................................................................................................................... 7 7. REPORT LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................................... 7 A P PEN D I X A: WET LAN D D A T A FOR M S ....................................................................... 1 APPENDIX B: WETLAND RATING FORM ................................................................... 6 A P PEN D I XC: SIT E P LAN ........................................................................................................... 14 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1. introduction and Purpose of Report This report presents the findings of a wetland determination performed by The Riley Group for a short plat application of an 84,506 square foot (1.95 acres) parcel (the "subject site"). The property is located at 11044 SE 192nd Street, Renton, WA, (Unincorporated King County), Parcel 6623400132 (Figure 1). In response to communication from King County DDES, the scope of work was to perform a wetland determination and delineation on the adjacent parcel to the north, Parcel 2698200220; permission was granted by the adjacent property owner to enter the site. The "study area" was the wetland edge adjacent to the subject site; a delineation of the entire off-site wetland boundary was not performed. Accordingly, the southern edge of a Category III wetland was delineated on the parcel to the north; the buffer of this wetland extends onto the subject site. No on-site wetland analysis was requested by King County and thus was not performed pursuant to this project. + Figure 1: Vicinity and Critical Areas Map I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION The site is nearly level and primarily grassland. A home is located at the south end of the site and several out-buildings and scattered vehicles are present. The adjacent site, i.e. the study area, is forested along its southern property boundary. Figure 2: Aerial Photograph I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1.2 BACKGROUND RESEARCH No streams or wetlands were mapped on the King County GIS Critical Areas Maps, as shown on Figure I. 2. Wetland Delineation 2.1 VEGETATION Vegetation was evaluated across the adjacent site to the north to determine the presence of hydrophytic plant communities. Plant communities are considered hydrophytic when more than 50 percent of the dominant species in the plant community have a wetland indicator status of facultative (FAC+, FAC, & FAC-), facultative wetland (FACW+, FACW, & FACW-), or obligate wetland (OBL), as listed in the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands, Region 9 -Northwest (Reed, 1993 and 1988). The indicator codes for plant species are noted in Table I. 2.1.1 TABLE 1. PLANT INDICATOR CODES Indicator Code Frequency of Occurrence in Wetlands Obligate Wetland (OBL) -occur almost always in wetlands >99% Facultative Wetland (FACW*) -usually occur in wetlands 67-99% Facultative (FAC» -equally likely to occur in wetlands or 34-66% non-wetlands Facultative Upland (F ACU» -usually occur in non-wetlands 1-34% Obligate Upland (UPL) -occur almost always in non-wetlands <1% Not Listed (NL) -no indicator status --- > Note: F ACW, FAC, and FACU also have + and -values to represent species near the wetter end of the spectrum (+) and species near the drier end of the spectrum (-). Dominant species were recorded as species compnsmg more than 20 percent of the plant community in each stratum (tree, shrub, and/or herb layer). 2.2 SOILS Anaerobic (saturated) conditions cause soils to form certain characteristics that can be observed in the field. Hydric indicators include: the presence of a matrix chroma of 1 or less in unmottled soil or 2 or less in mottled soil, gleyed soil, organic soils (peats and mucks), and the accumulation of sulfidic material. Soil pits were dug in each data point, using a shovel to depths of 16 to 18 inches below ground surface (BGS). Soils textures were characterized using Natural Resources Conservation Service protocol, and examined for hydric indicators as described by the Washington State Manual. Soil colors were identified using a Munsell soil color chart (Kollmorgen Corporation, 1988). Depth of soil saturation was recorded for each data point. Wetland Data Sheets are included in Appendix A. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Several secondary data points were examined across the wetland/upland boundary in order to determine the approximate boundary line, although data forms were not completed at the secondary data points. The secondary data points were used to examine similarities or differences in soils between major data points and to establish mapped soil unit boundaries. 2.3 HYDROLOGY At each data point, observations of direct and indirect wetland hydrology indicators were evaluated and recorded. Under normal conditions, hydrologic indicators are used to determine if the hydrology is either currently present or can be inferred from the guidelines provided in the Washington State Manual. These indicators include: recorded data, visual observation of inundation or saturation, watermarks, drift lines, sediment deposits, drainage patterns, local soil survey data, oxidized root channels, and water-stained leaves. 2.4 WETLAND RATINGS Wetlands, where present, were classified according to King County Code (KCC) 2IA.24.318 Wetlands -categories, asfollows: A. Wetlands are classified into category I, category IL category III and category IV based on the adopted Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington, Washington state department of ecology publication number 04-06-025, published August 2004. 3. Inventory Information The King County GIS Sensitive Areas maps do not indicate any wetlands or streams on or within I OO-feet ofthe subject site (Figure 1). 4. Wetland Study Results 4.1 VEGETATION The study area, located on the adjacent parcel to. the north, is dominated by red alder (Alnus rubra) and black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera) in the overstory; some western red cedar (Thuja plicata) is also present. Within wet areas represented by DPI, Scouler's willow (Salix scouleriana), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis) and Douglas spirea (Spiraea douglasii) codominate in the shrub layer; Himalayan blackberry (Rubus procerus) is common. Slough sedge (earex obnupta) is also present. This is a hydrophytic plant community. In the forested upland, the shrub layer is dominated by Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis); Himalayan blackberry dominates in the understory. Swordfern (Polystichum munitum) and Pacific blackberry (Rubus ursinus) co-dominate in the ground layer. This is a non-hydrophytic plant community. 4.2 SOIl,s The site is mapped on the Web Soil Survey as AgC (Alderwood gravelly sandy loam 6 -15% slopes), as shown on Figure 3. The Alderwood series is a non-hydric soil made up of moderately well drained soils that have a weakly consolidated to strongly consolidated substratum at a depth of 24 to 40 inches. Typically, these soils are on uplands. They are formed under conifers, in glacial deposits. In a representative profile, the surface layer and subsoil are very dark brown, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I dark-brown, and grayish-brown gravelly sandy loam about 27 inches thick. The substratum is grayish-brown, weakly consolidated to strongly consolidated glacial till that extends to a depth of 60 inches and more. Some small depressional areas mapped as Alderwood soils are inclusions of the poorly drained Bellingham, Seattle, Tukwila, and Shalcar soils. Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil in Alderwood soils and very slow in the substratum. Water moves on top of the substratum in winter. Soil on the adjacent site at DP2 within the upland forest was 10YR 3/2 unmottled loam. This soil generally matched the mapped series and is considered non-hydric. At DPI, soil was black (IOYR 3/1) muck to 9 inches underlain by mottled 10YR 412 fine sandy loam to 14+ inches. This soil generally matches the Tukwila series. The Tukwila series is made up of very poorly drained organic soils that formed in decomposing sedges, rushes, grasses, and shrubs. These hydric soils are in wet basins of upland depressions and on stream bottoms. In a representative profile, dominantly black to very dark brown muck extends to a depth of 60 inches or more. There is a seasonal high water table at or near the surface. SOIL SURVEY OF KING COUNTY AREA, WASHINGTON !:'i.no. , ..... ,111' ....... .. ~(· ... "".11OLII. •• :... Figure 3: Soil Map (Age: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 -15% slopes) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4.3 HYDROLOGY· Wetland hydrology indicators, i.e. soil saturation to the surface, were observed as DPI near the wetland edge. No indicators were observed at DP2 in the forested upland. An ornamental pond has been constructed within the northern end of the wetland. A constructed ditch apparently serves as an overflow device; a detailed evaluation was not conducted of these features. 5. Wetland Determination Based upon the presence of all three wetland indicators, a wetland is present on the adjacent parcel to the north. The southern boundary of the wetland was delineated and surveyed and is shown on the site plan in Appendix C. 6. Wetland Rating The wetland rates Category III using Version 2 of the Wetland Rating Form for Western Washington, Appendix B. Category III wetlands within Urban Areas of King County are protected with a standard 75-foot buffer width. As shown on the Site Plan (Appendix C), no modifications to this buffer width are proposed. 7. Report Limitations Work for this project was performed, and this report prepared for, Gary Watts and his authorized representatives in accordance with generally accepted professional practices. This report is not meant to represent a legal opinion. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. If you have any question regarding this report or its findings, please call us at (425) 415-0551, or contact us by fax at (425) 415-0311. Sincerely, ~'INC fJ " Celeste Botha , Senior Wetland Ecologist Report Distribution: Pau . Riley, LG, LHG President Gary Watts. Truvest. LLC (4 copies) I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I • ,. , I I DATA FORM 1 CR •• is.d) Routine Wetland Determination (WA Slate Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 COrDS Wetland Delineation Manoa\) . ProjecrlSite: Pm rad :JrYl R';2f)O:;;':;;" 0 -11/ CtJ.-. 5,:1} :r.-Oat.: Applicant/owner: ITmi/'e$f-.sr· ~ County: 3/29/67 . .' SlOtt: C80 ~ srrlR: ~ Do Nurmal CircutrulOnces exist on the site~ Is the ~ite significantly disturbed (nlJ'PiC'~ situ:ltion I~ Is th. area a potenti.1 Problem Atea? Exolanation of .rvnieal or nroblom aroa: Communi!,' 10: '" Tr..n.ectll): uP-7 Plot [0: JII.#h.., u..J L tP VEGEIA TION (For "rala. indicat. T = uoe: 5 = shrub: H = horb; V = vine) Domin.", PI.nt Soecies Srrillum T T 10 '-,' H),DROPH\'TIlf VEGET ATlOS ISDICA TORS: '* of dominonlS OBL FACW. &: FAC I()(} Check oil indicOlors th.t apply 8:. e'pliin below: Visual ob.e",.tlon of pl.nt specie. ~o\\;ng in areas of prolonged inund3tionJsilturillion Morphologic.1 acIapt3lions Technic.1 Literawle [ndicOlor Dominant Plnnt Soecies Srr:uum Fftc PAc.- Phy.iological/reproducth.., adaptations Wetland plant databa.e H ~ C:O\'er /S' .5 Personal knowled,e of re~ion.1 plant c~mmunitie. Other (exolain) Hydrophytic veeer.atian ptesent? Rationale for decisionIRem3rk.s: DO lndh::lIor Ff\CVt OBL HYDROLOGY Is itth"rowing .oason~ , (;) no :,.te, Marks: ye. ® Sediment DeposilS~ no~ Based on: ~SOil temp Irecord temp ____ ) Drift Lines: ye.r i\cl) Drainlge Pa"em.: yes -~ ~~~~-=~~aJo~t~he~IJ(~e'~DI.~i~n;I~~~ __________ ~~~~~=-~~_-~~~ __ ~~ Dept 'of inundation: ~inches O,idized Root (li~lS) Loe.l Soil Survey: ye,-AiO'1 Depth to free water in pit: Deoth to saturated soil: -CLinches inches Check allth .. apply & expl.in below: Stream. Lak. 01 S.8e data: __ __ Aerial ohotoeraohs: Wed~nd hydrology present? Rationale fOI decisionlRemarks: Channels <12 inrves) no -\....../ FAC Neutral: ' yes ~ Water-stained Le'\'et!~ no Other (explain): Other. no I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SOILS Map Unit Name A1w~ cJS L (Series 8: Phase) Taxonomv (sub"rouo) Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Monle colors (inehes) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) fJ-Cf A-ioYt:,3/! 1-ltf+-8 /oy;<.. Lf/J-Ye!. HydriC Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) _Hisrosol __ . _ Histic Epipedon _ Sulftdic Odor __ Aquic Moislure Regimt ~educin2 Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matnx Hydric soils presenl? seJ no Rationale (or decisionlRemarks: Wetland Detenninati!!n (circle) HydrophYlic vegelalion present? @ no Hydric s"ils present? no Wetland h"drolO!!V -sent? no RationaJelRemarks: \.:7 . . NOTES: [)F-/ Drainage Class;,..· _______ _ Field observations confirm Yes ® manned tvDe? ;\lonle abundance Texture. concretions. Drawing of soil size &: Conlr.lSl slruerure. etc. profile t mat£b dssrimi2D I M,,,,,,,,/I.. 1 s L .. , ----L.. Matrix chroma S :2 with monies __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Conlent in Sulfate Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Sue:iking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on :-.Iationalll.ocal Hydric Soils List Other (exDlain in remarks) G Is the sampling point no wilhin a we!land~ = Revised 4/97 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SOILS Map Unit Name ;4i~c?/ (6 c) (Series & Phase) Drainulre Class ________ _ Field observations conflrm (Y 0 No maDoed lVoe? Ta"(onomv (subl!roupJ Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color MOille colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell mois!) moist) o-f k , loiP-~/3 1M) . , Hydric Soil lndicators: (check all that apply) __ Hi5losol __ Hi"ic Epipedon __ Sulfidic Odor __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low·Chroma (=I..lmatrix Hydric soils present:' yes meV' Rationale (or decisionlRemarks: !...-/ Wetland Determination (circlc) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes!/ Hydric soils present? yes n ~ Wetland h\'drolo~v present? yes no NOTES: ~Iollie abund.:lnce size 8:. contrast Texture. concretions. structure. ele. __ Matrix chroma S 2 with mOllles __ Mg or Fe Concretions Drawing o( soil profile I match demiption, __ High Orpnic Contenl in Surfacc Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed On :>iational/l.oc:lll Hydric s..'ils List Other (explain in·remarks) Is the sampling point within a wetland? yes @ Revised 4197 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i' , Project/Sile: Applicont/O"llor: In\·.sli~'IQr1s1: DATA FORM I (Revised) Rouline Wetland Detennlnation (W.-\ State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 orps e and DelineatIon. anua C Wd • M II d. ~ '1 ?':J..oq d-d-O . AIR-/-- Tr~· S-? t·!20~ Do Normal Circumslance~ exist on the sil.? Q¥-no 15 me ~ite si,niticantly dilt1urbed (atrpic:LI.si~u3tion I':' yes $ 15 the area a potential Problem Area':' yl!s Expl.notion of alVDiclll or oroblem area: VE~EIAIIO~ (For strota. indicate T = tree: S = shrub: H ;;:z herb: V = v~ne) / Dominant PI.nt Soecies Str.uum 'k co"er Indicator Dominant Plant Seecies ·'~JYrA. bw r '10 FA-C.. AJu 1,( ruJr-T /-fa FIt-C. ()e-rvLf.-~ oS X'5 FItC0 11</1 a... d;Ac...-II 70 FIa{ Pn4 »VJ.ML H /0 Ftc£{ ~w~ V .;).~ PAc..- HYDROPHYI1C VEGETA nos INDICA TORS: 'k of dominants OBL. FACW, &:. FAC ?:-14 ~ 33 - C~ck all indicators thaI .:1ppl)' do! e!(,pl~in belo\\.-: - .' Oat.: 3/CJ..CJ(OJ- County: f::.-' $t ... , ~ srrlR: Community 10: DP-2 Tr.n .. cl \0: Plot \0: ,) "("Wft--/-1/ Stratum 'k co\'er Indk:uor .' ,~Yisual obser\"ouion of plant species growing: in ~ :". areAS of prolonged inund3tion/s.uur:nion Physiologicnllreproducti"'e ooaptations ----\\"c:tI;.nd pl:mt dat;.base --Morphologic.1 adaptotions --Personal tnowledge: of regionOlI plant communities -Techitic:al Literature Other (e,plain) HydrOphytk vegetation present? yes ~ R.tionale for.decisionIRemarks: l . ,(.' -- .HYDROLOGY .-" -= c Is il ih, growin .... son? e no Yo" .ter Mar1<s: yes~ S,dimerit ~iIS: ye~ -. t on B":ed on:&di-l soil .. mp 'record temp ..6:l ) Driti Lines: yes ~) Drain.g. p~"errs: yesew oth" 'expl.in, ....... Dept. bf Inundation: -==-inches Oxidized Root (1i\'im0,Q~ Local Soil Surve)": yes~ Channels <12 in .• es·. . Deplh to free "-aler in pit: .. ' -=-inches FAC fIIeut,.l: .. yes e;;. Water-stainl!1i Le:J.\'es yes~ Depth to ""urnted soil: .' =-, inches Check alllh.t apply It-explain below: Stream, Lake or gaga data: __ Other (explain): \ Aerial photoeraphs: Other: ........ Wedand hydrology present? yes ~ I Ralionale for decisionIRemarks: . v f I ~--------.----------------.. - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Wetland name or number WETLAND RATING FORM -WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2 -Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users Name of wetland (ifknown): 'ii:~ -~ r Date of site visit: 3/:2f l/O 7- Rated by t3.e.{rc,fe 73>0 thti. Trained by Ecology? Yes ~o_ Date of training 2-/1',/0 5 SEC: 36 TWNSHP: d.3 RNOE:.2.... Is SfflR in Appendix D? Yes_ No~ Map of wetland unit: Figure ~ Estimated size Z).jA-t:- SUMMARY OF RATING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland I 11_-III -.L IV_ Category I = Score >=7 0 Score for Water Quality Functions Category II = Score 51-69 Score for Hydrologic Functions Category lIT = Score 30 -50 Score for Habitat Functions Category IV = Score < 30 TOTAL score for Functions Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland I II Does not Applyv' ?-tf ,tJ /0 31 Final Category (choose the "highest" category from above) I J 1/ -I Summary of basic information about tbe wetland unit Wetland Unit Wis Special WetlaiidHGMCblsS ", Characteristics nsed for Ratin ~~---------4-4~~~~~~~~~ Estuarine NaturaIHe-r~it~a-e-w~e~tI~a-nd~----r-~~~~~~-------+~ Bog Mature Fo",re:::s::.t -------------+---+-===---------------1---1 Old Growt:!!h..!F'-'o"-r::::es!!.t __________ r-~Fl_?a:::t:::s--_:__=:_:_~----+___l Coastal La=oo"'n~ __________ -+---+-=F_'r_"es:::h:.;w:.:a:.:te"'r'_T"'i:=d:::a=_l -----+---i Interdunal=--______________ I--I-________________ --I. ..... None ofthe above Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 Check ifunit has multiple HOM classes resent August 2004 r--------.--------... Wetland name or number D Depressional and' FIatS Wetlands WATER QUALITY FUNCfIONS -Indicators that the wetland unit functions to improve water Quality D D 1. Does the wetland unit bave tbe J!otential to improve water quality? D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points ~ 3 D Unit has an intermittently flowing, OR highly constricted pennanently flowing outlet points = 2 Unit has an unconstdcted. or slightly constricted? surface outlet (permanently flowing) points = I Unit is a "flat" depression (Q. 7 on key), or in the Flats class, with permanent surface outflow and DO obvious natural outlet andlor oudet is a man-made ditch points = I (If ditch ;s not permanently flowing treal unit as "intermiuenrly flowing") Provide Dhoto or drawino S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surfilce (or duff layer) is clay or organic (use NRCS D definitions) YES points = 4 NO ooints = 0 D 1..3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation (emergent, shrub, andlor forest Cowardin class) D Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation> -95% of area points -5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation> = 112 of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation> = 1110 of area points = I Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation <1110 of area points = 0 Map of Cowardln veqetation classes D 1.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation. D This is the area of the wetland unit that is pondedfor at least 2 months, bllt dries out sometime during the year. Do not count the area that is permanently ponded. Estimate area as the average condition 5 out of 1 0 yrs. Area seasonally ponded is> Y, total area of wetland points ~ 4 Area seasonally ponded is> I/. total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < v.. total area of wetland points = 0 Map of Hvdroperiods D Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above 02. Does the wetland unit have tbe opportunity to improve water quality? D Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater dowogradient from the wetland. Note which of the following conditions provide the sources a/pollutants. A unit may have pollutants comingfrom several sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity. -Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft -Untreated stonnwater discharges to wetland -Tilled fields or orchards within 150 ft of wetland - A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas, residential areas. ~ fanned fields, roads, or clear-cut logging Residential, urban areas, golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland -Wetland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen -Other YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is I D TOTAL -Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from D I by D2 Add $core to table on D. 1 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 5 August 2004 I I Points I (only I score per box) (seep.38) I Figure_ I / I '7 I FIgure_ I 5 FIgure_ I I 2.. I ----~ I I 2-I ___ ~ • ..J (seep. 44) I I I multiplier t. I --- 24 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Wetland name or number D Depressional and Flats Wetlands HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS -Indicators that the wetland unit functions to reduce floodiri2 and stream de2radation D 3. Does the wetland unit have the (!otenti§1 to reduce flooding and erosion? D D 3.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland wlit Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Unit has an intermittently flowing. OR highly constricted pCffilanently flowing outlet points z::: 2 Unit is a 41at" depression (Q. 7 on key). or in the Flats class, with permanent surface outflow and DO obvious natural outlet andlor outlet is a man-made ditch points:;:l 1 (If dUch is not permanently flowing freat unit as "inlermiffenlly.flo1l'ing") Uoit has an unconstricted, or slie:htlv constricted, surface outlet (oermanen'fvnolt'il7~) points = 0 D D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods Estimate the height ofponding above the bollom of the outlet. For units with no outlet measure from the surface o/permanent water or deepest part (if dry). Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland" points "" 5 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 Unit is flat (yes to Q. 2 or Q. 7 on key) but has small depressions on the surfilce that Imp water points = 1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft points = 0 D D 3.3 Contribution of wetland unit to storage in the watershed &timate the ratio o/the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than lO times the area of unit points"" 5 The area of the basin is 1 0 to 1 00 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire unit is in the FLATS class _Qoints = 5 D Total for D 3 Add the points In the boxes above D D 4. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? Answer YES if the unit is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage, or reduction in water velocity. it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Answer NO if the water coming into the wetland is controlled by a structure such as flood gate, tide gate, flap valve, reservoir etc. OR you estimate that more than 90% of the water in the wetland is from groundwater in areas where damaging groundwater flooding does not occur. Note which of the following indicators of opportunity apply. -Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems -Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems -Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might otherwise flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems -Other YES multiplier is 2 (NO) multiplier is I D TOTAL -Hydrologic FUDctioDs Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4 Add score to table on p. I Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 6 August 2004 Points (only 1 score per box) (seep.46) 1- / ) ----- I 5"' I ----;.':" (seep. 49) multiplier / 5" Wetland name or nwnber ." :"r/' ~ ... ,,-.~" Points . T1J~e questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. (only I score i-tXsrr Ai FUNCTIONS -Indicators that unit functions to provide important habitat per box) H 1. Does tbe wetland unit have the notential to provide habitat for many species? H l.l Vegetation structure (see p. 72) Figure_ Check the types oj vegetation classes present (as defined by Cawardin)-Size thresholdJor each class is Y4 acre or more than 10% o/the area if unit is smaller than 2.5 acres, ~quatiCbed Emergent plants -v1crublshrub (areas where shrubs have >30% cover) __ Forested (areas where trees have >30% cover) \6 unit has aJorested class check if" The forested. class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopY, sub-canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, mosslground-cover) that each cover 20% within the foreste<rpoIyg~ Add the number 0/ vegetation structures that qualify. If you have: 4 structures or more points = 4 Map of Cowardin vegetation dasses 3 structtm:s points = 2 2 structures points = I 2- 1 structure points = 0 H 1.2. Hydroperiods (see p. 73) Figure_ Check the types a/water regimes (hydro periods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% o/the wetland or ~ acre to count. (see text/or descriptions oJhydroperiods) ~ennanentJy flooded or inundated 4 or more types present points = 3 ~easonaUy flooded or inundated 3 !lEes eresen!.. points = 2 ~ccasionalIY flooded or inundated 2 types present point = I __ Saturated only 1 type present points = 0 __ Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland __ Seasonally flowing stream in~ or adjacent to, the wetland 2-__ Lake..j"ringe wetland <=I 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland = 2 points Map of hydroperiods H 1.3. Richness of Plan! Specjes (see p. 75) Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft'. (different patches a/the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold) You do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Milfoil, reed canarygroS$, purple loosestrife, Canadian Thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 List species below if you want to: 5 • 19 sEecies points ~ I < 5 species points = 0 I Total for page .-£ Wetland Rating FOnD -western Washington version 2 13 August 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Wetland name or number H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats (see p. 76) Igure_ Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mUdflats) is high, medium, low, or none. None -0 points Low::::o 1 point ~~ ~ High = 3 points Moderate -2 points [riparian braided channels 1 NOTE: Tfyou have four or more classes or thl'ee vegetation classes and open water the ratin is alwa s "hi ". Use rna of Cawardin ve etation classes H 1.5. Special Habitat Features: (see p. 77) Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the ~ number of points you put into the next column. -arge, downed, woody debris within the wetland (>4in. diameter and 6 ft long). _' _Standing snags (diameter at the bottom> 4 inches) in the wetland __ Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft (lm) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the unit, for at least 33 ft (10m) __ Stable steep banks offme material that might be used by beaver Of muskrat for denning (>30degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet turned greylbrown) __ At least Y4 acre ofthin~stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg-laying by amphibians) __ Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in each stratum of plants NOTE: The 20% stated in early printings a/the manual on page 78 is an error. r---------------~~~~~--~~~--~~~~---H 1. TOTAL Score -potential for providing habitat q I '-::: ____________ A"'''':::d:.;le.:h::..e ",sc",o",re",s=o.:::m:..!H",I",. l:..:,-'.H",I",.2"" ",H:.:.I",.3'-., H=I.,::.4,,,,H.!.:I,,,. 5::.....JI... ____ I Comments Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 14 August 2004 ,----------------_ ................... -.. __ ._ ... . Wetland name or number H 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to provide hahitat for many species? H 2.1 Buffers (seep. 80) Flgure_ Choose the description that best represents condition o/buffer o/wet/and unit. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See text for definition of "undisturbed ... -100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no-grazing, no landscaping, no daily human use) Points = 5 -100 m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water> 50% circumference. Points = 4 -50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas. or open water >95% circumference. Points = 4 -100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water> 25% circumference, . Points = 3 -50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for> 50% circumference. Points = 3 If buffer does Dot meet any or tbe criteria above -No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft) of wetland > 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 ~ No paved areas or buildings within SOm of wetland for >50% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. PolDts = 2 -Heavy grazing in buffer. Points = 1 -Vegetated buffers are <2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference (e.g. tilled . /fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points = O. J 5L. Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points = 1 Aertal ohoto showinQ buffers H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (see p. 81) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide. has at least 30% cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads, paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor). YES = 4 points (go to H 2.3) NO = go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 50ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake-fringe wetland, ifit does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question,above? YES = 2 poInts (go to H 2.3) NO = H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 Is the wetland: within 5 mi (8km) ofa brackish or salt water estuary OR 0 within 3 mi ofa large field or pasture (>40 acres) OR within I mi of. lake greater than 20 acres? YES = I point NO = 0 DoiDts Wetland Rating Form -western Washiogton version 2 15 Total for page~ August 2004 1iiI.: II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Wetland name or number H 2.4 Wet1and Landscape (choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland thaI bestfits) (see p. 84) There are at least 3 other wetlands within ~ mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields, or other development. points -5 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with Httle disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within Ih mile points = 5 There are at least 3 other wetlands within III mile, BUT the connections between them are disturbed points = 3 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetland within Yz mile points = 3 There is at least 1 wetland within Y2 mile. points = 2 There are no wetlands within Y:!: mile. points = 0 H 2. TOTAL Score -opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores from H2.] ,H2.2, H2.3, H2.4 TOTAL for H I from page 14 Total Score for Habitat Functions -add the points for H 1, H 2 and record the result on Wetland Rating Fonn -western Washington version 2 17 p. I August 2004 {) ----- I I I ----- C; ---_. ID I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I " J .. :\ .. 10-1 I ! I I I I , , ~i 'e , ~!I , ~, , , • , -, , J 0' j , " II '-.... i " "'" --... ;~ , " " Ii " "' I' ~~ '" (--...... \ • \ ' ) '-- -'0' 'i ill , , "" i r !f ; i,I ,,' , <, ~~;,,:~r~ :,ia.\:~=.,.~ ~'f)-I .:1.' " .,' ! ,/: 'f : ~ I ",'.. 5.E. ,192nd 51. " • I ,;' "".', " I , ",-I.' ", '" 1 _ ... l' .. ~ '---, !i' , s~ I G I tiS .. 1 I \ , f , , //'\ " , '0/ .. e " <! ( / / - --'_.~ .. _--, II !i I i , • i , EGGEBRECHT SHORT PLAT 11044-SE 192ND ST. RENTON 96053 KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON Date of Mailing: October 12, 2007 ================================================== If you wish to receive a copy of the DOES report and decision of this application, complete and return this portion of the notice to the Land Use Services Division at the address listed above. File No. : L07S0057 j ~~~~se print) t\eJ,...~ Gr I>u.EMoi7-E. Mailing Address: \ "I ,";1-... 1\oTl'l PL s,E-IZ..e,J:t'O.J, 'IN ~ 'H3oS S Telepi10ne No. &Ior e-mail address: Zob,1,.'UD.4-IoSB I ',""I>L.\..EMolZe(O>J-IoIM,..Il ... c.o/V'1 King County has received an application to develop property at the address listed above, You are receiving this notice because our records indicate that you own property within approximately 500 feet of the proposal. Type2 NOA l"- N ..... :E CL-o <O .... ~ o 0 Ii « u.. ,;j , " • J 1r ~ ! lj J II § t I !!I ® 0 I , I ' I ,,.. H ~I= j :i , I I ~ ...... N ~ ..- I ;! ::E J f a.."'O ~ § co '-Q. ~n J 5 ~ § ! I ~~ ~ 10 < ® 0 J r--. N ...... ~ :E § ;! f a.. "0 ~ J 8 CO .... ~JJJ6~ s ! I o 0 ~ «LL 10 <: ® 0 , r-- ~ I I N 'IJ ~ ...... ~ I iH~/t II f a.. ~ § J co"E ~ U~IUIJh n~d ~ ~ ~ § I t o 0 on ! « LL ~ II ® ~ J 0 ~ n "-_ 'II C\I i t ,h ! ~ ...... ~ :1 ! f a.. "'0 ! litH f to ... UhUU l I ~ 0 0 u. <'i «I .~e l r~ ® J J § l"- f J f I 1m f N J ...... V ~ ~ 0 I lIu IIf ~ !_55 i I w Q..-ol!! ® (0,-0 L,t" j U~~~~t~I1~,,~IHjnJlnh~ 0011: « u. ~ ! <! < []<f,1I11~DJ~~~<~:B I D D I < 0 J ~. ..... s It N or" I J I ! ! II ~ ~ J f a.. ~ ~ <o"U .. I o .... .. « ~ ~ < 1< ~ ® 0 • • .JI • , ! ~ l"'-f N ~ J ..--§ ~ :::E ! I a.." ~ ~ ® co ..... (/) 00'" « LL ~ 0 -, n ,.... Jl --J ~ N ~ t J j I ~ ..- ~ :1 ! I 0..-0 ! lldl f <0 .... e 0 0 UhUU i I « u... 1'i «I '.~IiI [1 r~ ® b A06PM127 Ford T"" """" • N 10 T"" I22>OS • N 10 .... _- ~=. ~SAO_ IHI SfoOCDII .... ~SAO_ ElSAO- I'.' ~"-'5=dj~1r Ii ... t:> ~3 J, I I. 'U . CD SAO WIIIInd 11i1il8) ---t=I ""'" __ """- 0 - \\\.RD~~ HiIIza'd~ 1:'1 ....... ,. -""""" e,.;._ o 400 IlOO Feel ,--., feet ® ICIng County F'tJIdrIIe.: .... 21.2008: I'GIIIOOl\1d)I'Q1Nv_~ ) J , ,.... N ...... ~ a.. <0"0 .. o .... OJ « 0 ~ LL )l ,/I o • , I 1'1 ...... N ...... ~ 0...-0 <0 .... ~ o 0 ~ ~ u. ~ ~ ~ J § II ! 0 -. ~ i :! I ® I T • 1/ I I I r l"'- I I N ~ ..... I ; J ::E J I a.."O ~ ~ ~ I co .... Il. ~n J t ~ , ~ 0 '" ® u. ~ o < J 0 .~ ;:; I • i "\ I l I"'- N § ...... I ; I f ~ J a.. "0 j 8 <0....0. I! h ~ & 2 ! , o 0 ~ ® «u.. <10 < 0 GISMO -Pennit Infonnation Report 1.0.0 ® King County DOES Permit Information Report -Change ReRort- This report was generated: 3/21/20069:18:06 AM Parcel Number: 6623400132 (Prlnt?~ Select All I Clear Selection I Switch Selection b::;;;::If~ ~11li1!LlJ:{£3, I j D iA06PM127 ; ........ _ ... " .. _-.. ~.-" D D lAOSPM10S IE9800226 l ._. __ ..L .... ,_.w"nwww. __ ,._ ... Get detailed reRort Page 1 of 1 The information Included In this report has been compiled by Kin! from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or damages Including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost Dr from the use or misuse of the information contained in this repor this report or Information on this report Is prohibited exce~ permission of King County. http://ddeshome/gis/reports/permit.aspx?pin=6623400132 03/2112006 ® King County DDES Parcel Information Report This report was generated: 3/21/2006 9:17:32 AM Parcel Number: 6623400132 8 Base Info Parcel Number: 6623400132 Tax Payer: EGGEBRECHT ERVIN E Annexation: N/ A Jurisdiction: King County Situs Address: 11044 SE 192ND ST Zip Code: 96055 Postal City B Reference Info Plat Name: PANTHER LAKE GARDEN TRS Plat Recording Date: N/A Plat Lot: 13 Plat Block: N/A Kroll Page: 604 Thomas Brothers Page: 686 1/4-S-T-R: SE-32-23-5 Acres: 1.94 (64,506 SqFt.) El Planning Info Zoning: R-8 Comprehensive Land Use: um Assessor's Open Space: N/A Commercial Use: N/A Number of Units: N/A The Information Included In this report has been complied by King County staff from a variety of sources and Is subject to change without notice. King County makes no repreSentations or warranties, express or Implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such Information. King County shi!lll not be liable for any general, special, Indirect, Incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the Information contained In this report. Any sale of this report or Information on this report is prohibited e)(cept by written permission of King County. Appraised Land Value: 2005 -$124,000, 2006 -$245,000 Appraised Improvements Value: 2005 -$201,000, 2006 -$112,000 8 Administrative District Info Community Plan Area: 500s Creek Unincorporated Area Council: N/A School District: Renton School District 403 Fire District: 0040 Roads MPS Zone: 341 ($3,362) Roads Transportation Concurrency Mitigation Zone: 797 Waterfront: No Water System: WATER DISTRICT Water Service Planning Area: 5005 Creek Water and Sewer District Sewer System: PUBLIC Airport Noise Remedy Program: N/ A Bald Eagle Flag: N/A Council District: 5 Julia Patterson Drainage Basin: Black River: WRIA 9 Police Jurisdiction: King County Police Precinct: 3 Police District: F3 Snowload Zone: Standard Agricultural Production District: N Page lof2 Forest Production District: N Rural Forest Focus Area: N Transfer Development Rights Type: N/A Transfer Development Rights Status: N/A Transfer Development Rights Permit Number: N/A 8 Inspection Area Info Building Inspection Area: S-6 Clearing Inspection Area: Jim Ballweber Code Enforcement Inspection Area: Bill Turner ESA Inspection Area: Kathy Newborn Grading Inspection Area: Ramon Locsln Land Use Inspection Area: Tim Cheatum 8 Sensitive/Critical Area Info Sensitive Areas Notice(s) on Title: None Aquatic Areas Buffer: N Basin Condition: Low Flow Control Area: Flood Problem Flow Water Quality: Basic Water Quality Treatment Critical Aquifer Recharge Area: None Area of Potential Wetland Influence: N r Page 2 of 2 ® King County DOES Parcel Information Report This report was generated: 3/21/20069:17:32 AM Parcel Number: 6623400132 [3 Base Info Parcel Number: 6623400132 Tax Payer: EGGEBRECHT ERVIN E Annexation: N/ A Jurisdiction: King County Situs Address: 11044 SE 192ND ST Zip Code: 98055 Postal Cjty 8 Reference Info Plat Name: PANTHER LAKE GARDEN TRS Plat Recording Date: N/ A Plat Lot: 13 Plat Block: N/ A Kroll Page: 604 Thomas Brothers Page: 686 1/4-S-T-R: SE-32-23-5 Acres: 1.94 (84,506 SqFt.) 8 Planning Info Zoning: R-8 Comprehensive Land Use: um Assessor's Open Space: N/A Commercial Use: N/ A Number of Units: N/A The Information included In this report has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and Is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or Implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such Information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, Indirect, Incidental, or consequential damages Including, but not Hmlted to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the Information contained In this report. Any sale of this report or Information on this report is prohibited except by written permission of King County. Appraised Land Value: 2005 -$124,000, 2006 -$245,000 Appraised Improvements Value: 2005 -$201,000, 2006 -$112,000 8 Administrative District Info Community Plan Area: Soos Creek Unincorporated Area Council: N/A School District: Renton School District 403 Fire District: 0040 Roads MPS Zone: 341 ($3,362) Roads Transportation Concurrency Mitigation Zone: 797 Waterfront: No Water System: WATER DISTRICT Water Service Planning Area: 5005 Creek Water and Sewer District Sewer System: PUBLIC Airport Noise Remedy Program: N/A Bald Eagle Flag: N/A Council District: 5 Julia Patterson Drainage Basin: Black River: WRIA 9 Police Jurisdiction: King County Police Precinct: 3 Police District: F3 Snowload Zone: Standard Agricultural Production District: N Page 1 of 2 Forest Production District: N Rural Forest Focus Area: N Transfer Development Rights Type: N/A Transfer Development Rights Status: N/A Transfer Development Rights Permit Number: N/A 8 Inspection Area Info Building Inspection Area: S-6 Clearing Inspection Area: Jim Ballweber Code Enforcement Inspection Area: Bill Turner ESA Inspection Area: Kathy Newborn Grading Inspection Area: Ramon Locsin Land Use Inspection Area: Tim Cheatum EI Sensitive/Critical Area Info Sensitive Areas Notlce(s} on Title: None Aquatic Areas Buffer: N Basin Condition: Low Flow Control Area: Flood Problem Flow Water Quality: Basic Water Quality Treatment Critical Aquifer Recharge Area: None Area of Potential Wetland Influence: N Page 2 of 2 JICHn'v -Penni! Infonna!ion Report 1.0.0 ® King County DOES Permit Information Report -Change ReRort- This report was generated: 3/21/20069:18:06 AM Parcel Number: 6623400132 (~rvt Select All I Clear Selection I Switch Selection Page 1 of 1 The Information Included in this report has been compiled by Kin! from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information shaH not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost pr from the use or misuse of the information contained in this repor this report or information on this report is prohibited exce~ permission of King County. I-I=;~'''/~I 'q ;'I~ ~~I~;' 'I~ . 0 1 A06PM127 PREAPP-I PENDING I 166234001321 FORD SHELLY i 0 O! ~~~~~-;~-~-____l~REAPP_!-~~~~----J~~~SE-DPROiECr4-LOT SHRT--~~;;~~~:~;T; ~~~~~~~~~~I~N t ~ ,-L. ,1 JENF~R=~j:~~~=~_ J~?~~.~:~~ERTY 2-3 _: _____ "~~2~~~=~_2I~~~~~:~:T~ ___ J~ o i E9800226 ~ ____ '_MM _.,lM_"" WM __ '«" __ '_ G~ detailed regort http:// ddeshome/ gis/reports/penni t. aspx ?pin=6623 400 132 03/2112006 ~ E .0 :I I/) c: 0 .. C'CI .~ ii C. cp I!! Q. ;.; .e ~ .... "'~:'~I\' 115J Sf !: + 0070 108.)1 N 89-15-1' • -<'I .ll!.., I!! ~ .... U oq C'CI ,c:CI "" J!I (I)~ ~o _<'I ... -,c:CQ Gle» u CQ I!! 'It: ,,0 .-.. .0->-.-GI GI GI "U CI~ .0 .. ClC'CI :I C'CI WQ. (l)Q. I 28 -.,9 r' ',' 6:"y ' I ~.J c 022.4 ~ our:. 10 K ISa PJ .;.~:~~ "'JaOIl Sf 0134 , '20 : :JO , , , , , , !! JJ . ..; I I ""'i I I I I : , , . I I •. , , , , " ~ , ,- J I=~J . : :2 ..... : ~:~;~! s::::o ~,~ ~,< , ,~ ! __ !J9 .. 0!-__ _ • 88-5 0 -J 8 • "-="",,!r+,.,..t:::" 129.0' L.qT;<2 ~8.l5 .~~~} LOT 3 ! ..... , -: 2 IDiOt sr I A:I:::: ~~. 8.Hh sr : .".- 0136.... <i%W! 5 KC5P, 59050211-:::: ~o 109.08 I • 88-50-ll • 159.08: 9208189007 :;;; · , , -IJ 88-16-31 • " ---~15~J =--'''-l 20m, om : i. f -.-, _0 : :: • , J08.18 4.28 At 18&570 sr ()()1)-()400 , "e. =~ ___ ....;;0132===}.I ~i • I '0 ." • I 20 0129 • 5 159.08 BtA 1050.01 SP MTr._,.JI..IB,;;5,R-..!6..L 5 ' 8 85 8U , , : • , , I 20 I , .. , 0 · '" , , ! ~- ., ::!',:':!I := I ,- :~ '0' , 0 ,e,;""; ,--,~ DE 1048 JI.-__ 1~5:"'.!lJ9I.-~JO~.",J::.'..u;,P.:t::.4J. .. _-I g.o au I ---', ---------------------~-----.5i2/16--~-------:;: ~ -..-:: . 90 16 ~ ____ s:__ .... H !8-50-"f8 • H 86-50- (ROBERT MeLVILLE RD. NO 1119, EST. 2-5-1917, C . CO. 15 161.51 J2l 12 p, 111.56 <J22. l> -.~:::'; 1500 sr A()(PjJ;nl z 7 ~©~~W~[ID MAR 17 2008 K.9. D.D.E.S. l(ing County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton. Washington 98055-1219 206-296-e600 TIY 206-296-7217 To be completed by DOES Staff Pre-application No. Aa/Jn/Z7 Date Received (Stamp) \0) rn©rn~Wg 0 Lru MAR 11 2006 o I am interested in receiving FREE infonnation and design assistance regarding compliance with Green Building anellor Low Impact Development. King County will contact the applicant. . . . . PI rI t ease pi n Applicant Name Shelly Ford I Date 3/15/2006 Address 1326 Beacon Way South Phone 206-818 -7012 I Fax 425 -226 -8008 I E-mail shellvford@comcaslnet Project Description Subdivide 1.94 acre parcel into 9 lots Permit(s) being requested Land Use type II. shortplat Project Address/Location 11044 SE 192nd St. Parcel No(s) 662340-0132 Renton, WA 98055 Please indicate if pre-application is: D Land Use Feasibility [8J Mandatory D Consolidated Check the box(es) regarding issues you wish to discuss: I8l Land Use Penn it Issues: Subdivision 1 CUP 1 Variances I Reasonable Use I PAUE [8J Site Issues: Zoning 1 Setbacks 1 Density 1 Subdivision Design 1 Landscaping [8J Site Issues: Traffic 1 Road Access 1 Road Improvement 1 Road Variances 1 Parking Layout [gI Site Issues: Drainage 1 Site Development 1 SWDM Variances & Adjustments o Shoreline Issues: Substantial Development Pennit 1 Pennitted Uses 1 Shoreline Setbacks D SEPA Issues: SEPA Checklist I Off-Site Improvements I Mitigation [gI WetianellStream Issues: Buffers I Building Setbacks 1 Flood Plains 1 Mitigation o Geotechnical Issues: Steep Slope I Landslide 1 Seismic 1 Coal Mine 1 Erosion D Clearing/Grading Issues: Site Development 1 Clearing Restrictions 1 Site Restoration D Building Issues: Building 1 Mechanical: HVAClEnergyl Barrier-Free Standards D Fire Issues: UFC 1 Fireflow 1 Access 1 Sprinklers 1 Alanns I Hazardous Materials D Health Issues: Sewer 1 Septic 1 Water 1 Groundwater/Noise Impacts o Other (Specify): l.andUsePreapMeetingslnfoAndReqFORM lo-infreq-preap.pdf 0912812005 Page 3 of4 ,+ .- Revised for Web: 0811212005 Please indicate the numbers and types of representatives that will be at the pre-application meeting from your design team: Will WiIlNol Attend Attend IX! 0 Applicant o 0 Architect IX! 0 Civil Engineer IX! 0 Developer Will WiIlNot Attend Attend o 0 Geotechnical Consultant o 0 Landscape Architect o 0 Legal Consultant o 0 Property Owner Will WiIiNol Attend Attend o 0 Structural Engineer o 0 Wetlands Consultant o 0 Others: Total Number Attending _3::...... _________ _ I certify that I am the applicant for this pre-application meeting request and I understand that DOES will assess hourly review fees for each DOES staff member involved In pre-application research, meetings and post-meeting follow-up work, and that I assume financial responsibility for all fees associated with this request. Note: An advance deposit of $392.44 is required to schedule a pre-application meeting. lVIake checks payable to King County Office of Finance. If you have any questions about your pre-application meeting. please contact DOES at 206-296-6600. Check out the DOES Web site at www.metrokc.qovlddes LandUsePreapMeetingslnfoAndRaqFORM lc-infreql'reap.pdf 09/2812005 Page4of4 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-121 April 5'\ 2006 Ms. Shelly Ford 1326 Beacon Way S. Seattle, WA 98144 Tracking Number:· Applicant: Meeting Date: Location: Room: Planner: A06PM127 Pre-app Meeting Type: Mandatory Eggerbrecht Wednesday, Apri119'h, 2006 Time: 11:00 a.m. Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Conference Room C-1-(Please meet on the first floor) Angelica Ve\!lsquez Phone No.: 206-296-7136 Please advise us if any changes are needed in the meeting date or time, so that we may reschedule the meeting as soon as possible. Please reference the projecttracking number (see above) to any correspondence you may wish to submit to us. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please call the planner identified above. Please wait on the first floor for the planner to meet you. cc: Curt Foster, P.E., Senior Engineer Kim Claussen, P/PM III Kris Langley, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic Review Mark Follmer, P.E., Project Engineer Nick GiIlen, Wetland Ecologist Larry West, K. C. Geologist Carol Rogers, Office Technician Daniel Turner I BSD front desk Velasquez, Angelica From: Sent: To: Subject: From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Angelica: Follmer, Mark Wednesday, April 19, 2006 9:45 AM Velasquez, Angelica FW: A06PM127 . Langley, Kristen Tuesday, March 21, 2006 3:27 PM Velasquez, Angelica Follmer, Mark; Gillen, Nick; West, Larry A06PM127 This appears to be a pre-app that we should meet on, internally, before we meet with the Applicant. Aside from the, now all-too-typical minimum density vs. concurrency-driven 9-lot short plat issue (and the ramifications that has on the potential traffic impacts of the proposal), there are some significant issues with respect to access to the proposed plat. Thanks! Kris 1 ® King County DOES Report on Assessor's Legal Info -Change Report- This report was generated: 4/19/2006 10:25:20 AM Parcel Number: 6623400132 (Pilhti} Legal Description 13 PANTHER LAKE GARDEN TRS W 1/2 LESS S 130 FT Wednesday, Apr 19, 2006 10:24 AM User: velasqueza Computer: DE235362 Os: Windows NT Version: 5.1 The inform.tlon included in this report hu been complied by King County .t<lff from .. varletv of sources Ind Is slJbjec:t to chang, without notice. King County makes no represtnutions or lurnntiu, eMpress or Implied, u to the ucuracy, tompl,unns, timelinu., or rights to the use of such Information. Kino County shall not b. lIabl. for <In.,. oener.1. special. Indirect. incldenul. or consequential d .. mtOu Indudim), but not limited to, lost r .... enuu or lost profits resulting from the ust or misuse of the informnion cont.-Ined in this report, Any sal. of this report or in(orm.tlon on this report: Is prohibited INcept by written permission of King County. Taxpayer/Mailing Address EGGEBRECHT ERVIN E 11044 SE 192ND ST RENTON WA 98055 I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I ' I I PreapJ!lIcation Meeting Process Timeline - I Permit No: A06PM127 Project Name: Ford Planner: AVEL Engineer: MFOL Other Staff: KLAN; NGIL; LWES; Note: Review Eackages distributed to all staff assigned to this proiect. Date Day 1 Intake by counter staff. 3/17/06 I 2 3 PPM III assigned. 3117106 4 PPM III assigned to staff. 3/21106 5 Meeting packets routed. 3/21106 I 6 I 7 8 Meeting scheduled. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Hold preapplication meeting. Due on or before 4117/06 PPM 1I Screen; clarify request, if needed. AsSign to planner. Determine other staff needed. Update Permits Plus, Include staffing. Varlances/CUP/CAAE, etc. -Route file to Shirley with a deadline for the meeting to be held and list of the staff to attend. Plats/short plats -route the file to the planner with a deadline for the meeting to be held and list of the staff to attend. VarianceslCUP/CAAE, etc. -prepare a fee estimate for both the prea(!p and the permit. PPM 1I Review the file, prepare for the meeting. After the meeting, update Permits Plus w/comments and notes from meeting. After the meeting, change the status to "MTG held" unless a_~pllcanl wants to keep the preal!P open for follow-up questions. Put the file in the preapp file cabinet or Rive to the PPM III . . S:LUSO_PLANNING, TIMELINES_ 3.21 ,06 li : .. To,.. 1 Subtect: IFoIImer. Mark: Langley, Kristen: Gillen. Nick: West. tarrY: RR, OOES C1 I I Pr .... ppllcatlon Meeting -_127 ----I Location.: Start time, Eng time: Llw=ed==04==1:=19#./200§=6==t.;'~] ·III:OOAM I~JI OAII~event .... rW_ed_04-,'c...19.:-/20_06_--,-i""",::I112:00PM l.;;i.11 ~ Reminder: IL:.I5::.;mInut==es:'-__ .kI"..;J;1 .~ 5ho~ time os: L:11li::.-.Bus_Y'--___ --"-(~"'~~ -----------------------------~------~--------- I MeetingWorksp.ce." .1 0 ThIs is on on6ne meeting using: lM:cTO$oft NetN.eting Could we have an in-house meeting at 10:30 or 10:45 ,. ,ontocts .. , 1 I I I categories .. , I I Tuesday, Apr 04, 2006 08:54 AM User: velasqueza Computer: DE235362 Os: Windows NT Version: 5.1 5KB V 4 KB Y' 12KB V 2KBV, 275 KB '?' 114 KB ? I KB V ee9 B V 2KB '?' 144 KB V 7816 V 3 KB V HB'? 4KB V 5926,? 12KB? EGGEBRECHT SHORT PLAT -TR: V VES -r- l_<:' \j<.G L \ ~ b~10-A-Y-8 ~J0I\L~?\S OWNER: ERVIN EGGEBRECHT 1 1044 SE 1 92ND STREET RENTON, WA 98055 AGENT: SHELLY FORD TRUVEST, LLC P.O. Box 1754 RENTON, WA 98057 PHONE 253-851-7009 FAX 253-851-7161 PREPARED By: ~' PYRAMID ( ENGINEERING LLC 29015 MILITARY ROAD 5., #544 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 PHONE 253-852·1 164 FAX 253-859-2065 EXPIRES 2-2-09 JUNE 27,2007 ILij?§)({J)~51 K.C. 0.0.E.8. ~ I EGGEBRECHr SHORT PLAT LEvEL 1 DRAINAGE ANALYSIS OWNER: ERVIN EGGEBRECHT 1 1044 SE 1 92 ND STREET RENTON, WA 98055 AGENT: SHELLY FORD TRUVEST, LLC P,O. Box 1754 RENTON, WA 98057 PHONE 253-851-7009 FAX 253-851-7161 . PREPARED8¥. COPy ~i PYRAMID Z . ENGINEERING ~ LLC 29015 MILITARY ROAD S., #544 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 PHONE 253·852·1 164 FAX 253-859-2065 JUNE 27, 2007 1L~~S~(Q)57( 1oJ~©~~W~1o' Lru ALiG 2 0 2007 ~ K.C. D.D.E.S. TABLE OF CONTENTS TASK TITLE PAGE 1.0 Study Area Definition and Maps ......................................... 1 2.0 Resource Review..................................................................... 2-4 3.0 Field Inspection.......................................................................... 5-7 4.0 5.0 APPENDICES Drainage System and Problem Descriptions Mitigation of Existing or Potential Problems A. J. Sanders Email to P. Gonzales, May 18, 2007 B. iMAP Website Product Maps, May 2007 C. Drainage Complaint Summary D. Harrison NDAP Study, King County DNRP, May 15, 2002 E. Wetland Report, The Riley Group, May, 2007 F. Off-site Analysis Drainage System Table G. Water Quality and Quantity Calculations H. Existing and Developed Conditions Maps 8 9 TASK 1.0 -Study Area Definition and Maps The project site is located within Unincorporated King County, Washington, generally south southeast of the city of Renton and north northeast of the city of Kent. The project address is: 11044 SE 19Z nd Street, Renton, WA 98055. The proposed project is a 9-lot short plat on a 1. 95-acre site. The preliminary project development map is provided on a following page. The result of the project will be the construction of 9 urban-style homes fronting on a paved culdesac access. Storm runoff from the impervious areas of the project will be collected and routed to the project's drainage control system via catch basins, pipes and possibly overland flow. Drainage control for the project will consist of a combination water quality / detention vault located within a tract. The vault will include a recreation court area on the top. Discharge from the drainage control system will be connected to the existing drainage system within SE 192 nd Street via a pipe system. The project is located within the Green River drainage basin. The project site is located near the upper end of the local sub-basin which drains south to Panther Lake. The north edge of this lake is just over ZOOO-feet south of SE 192 nd Street. Panther Lake then drains to the north northwest to a series of channels through Renton, ultimately discharging to the Green River. Soils in the area are Alderwood series as shown by the SCS Soil Survey of King County. A soils map is provided. The purpose of this report is to identify and describe the downstream system, the limitations of the system and proposed mitigations. 1 Legend Hydrogauges 0 Lakes and Large Rivers 11 : Nisqu~11)' 4-ACTIVE , Streams iJ0i"i1 12: Cl1ambcrs'CIowr ,/v" ;Hlf!i .. Ii:.':.;!' + inac:lNe j'/ Incorporated Area Shaded Reliel I County Boundary King County Water Resource ". Inventory Areas Highways 0 King County Drainage Basins [g 5: Sli1loguami5h Streets 1 : Snohomish fd' !lign_ a : C ... ",·Sam!nomi5h ',-,-.. l) Artori:lls 9: Du........m.oGroon {l".:/ loGol 10: Puyallup.Whit. (conti EGGEBRECHT SHORT PLAT -VICINITY MAP Legend Hydrogauges 0 Lakes and Large Rivers 1 : Snohomish ~ ACTII/[ , Streams 8: Cedar·S:lmm:urush ;\/ .. -+ Inactiw Wetlands (1990 Surveyl 9: O_h-Groan I County Boundary fJ Kin'9 Coun1)'WcU~nd SuMf'/ 10: PuyaUup·Whito /0 Highways ~ Hmional Wat"'nd t"vantol)' SUJ'¥lJ)' 11 : Nisqually , 0 King County Drainage Basins j'/ Incorporated Area I"~ 12: Chlllll ..... .c1o>oo' ,\, ii Streets Channel Migration Hazard 2005 Color Aerial Photos I;'sI Areas Shaded Re lief Itigh_ (. j} Anari31s ;f8i~ • MODERATE Locol II SEVERE Parcels King County Water Resource ~ Floodways Inventory Areas 100 Year Floodplain ~ 5 : Stillogullmish '--"'~ (contI EGGEBRECHT SHORT PLAT -KING COUNTY DRAINAGE BASINS Legend I" I County Boundary 0 KilliJ County Drainage Basin .. Highways /.1 Shoreline Reaches Streets 0 Lakes and Large Rivers lIigh_ , Streams j" Artcriats ;V Incorporated Area I."",,' Shaded Relief ,-. )II ~/21/07 J;12pm -\'V'.,.. ... 11\'101.11 PIot\Starrr&ahoge~m_y-Pn:I;.c:t-Wott16wg ~~ .. ,. ~ o (J) " N --J " o --J "'0 ~$! r.;~ z G) lJ :::0 f11 C ;::;: z » ~ lJ :::0 o L. f11 () -I ,/ /' / ./ -.r -' .J L-J .... " r-r l "l " J r-' 1 L-..J r-- ' ., r' 'L '--. r --I .J I r j I I J --, _. --~.:::. \~., CONDO 8' WOOO FENCE CONDO iil I ill ----------_ .. - ~ 0 Ul -ir--i -<""0 "U»:;o ~Z;:: o CUl -i"" ~ r _ .. J I +-~ \ 1---\ I I I I I I I I I ~ 0 I S8ft'55"£,\ '5'''' )J \ I I I \ i EP~'~T ...... ----1-.-... .. ...... __ .. -... , .. --I C» .... (JI ~ c.. o ~~ >:::1 c0:::l ~:Zo '-z 6' WOOD FENCE N H()\IS[ I',:;''C, f"lP~'1 ~~:'." :';:'r ."' .. ' ~':f', '~il- - ~ - -.. --4Il . ..1. i r' CD 10 ::j »»=0 '1 -.. ~12:: ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ -.--_-.-_ J // I J .. , / I J . ":' I .. ,:'" I I f'/';:'I ' , .. :.;-' -~,::;:j~;(~-) \ , .••• :.' ,/' '-.... I \.. " I ) ..2\ 'n "_ /' CD Q':j r -. - L.i~ ~ / I ZO"" / :EN ".:i ,/ / -, .. , .. ,. __ ~:J)/-.J ji // I L.'" :; I . / ~ / L ..... 1 I --/ -=f" o~r-v.r--------»..,,0 .... -I z;:;:1z HOllse AZG) :::to 0;:: Z"U "'-----, .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I __ .1... o z W (J) o 0 ..... II (J) o . ;::;: . ~~I ~ lO - =:!> ~ III ! e ~ !!! 9 ~ i REVISIONS: APPD. ri PYRAMID ENGINEERING LLC 29015 MILITARY ROAD SOlITH. PMB #544 FEDERAL WAY. WA 98003 PH 253-852·' 1 64 FAX 253-859·2065 EGGEBRECHT SHORT PLAT PRELIMINARY PROJECT MAP 1 1044· SE 192ND STREET, RENTON, WA 98055 KING COUN1Y, WASHINGTON EGGEBRECHT SHORT PLAT -BASIN CONTOUR MAP Legend -I County Boundary ~ lI;ghWll)' l1li MODERATE 1- ContoUR (5ft darkl ~~ ArtarioIs III SEVeRE r;"" ;./ 10000lOO; 1000 La<oI ~ SAO Wetland ,I,.f OltJor Parcels Shaded Relief , 0 Lakes and Large RiveR Highways ;V Incorporated Area 1/ Streams Channel Migration Hazard Streets Areas {conti Soil MaP-l(ing County Area, Washington (EGGEBRECHT SHORT PLAn N A o 50 100 200 o~======~~========~roo:?================~,~,~~==============~~~,~ USDA Natural Resouroes :e:J Conservation Service Web Soil Survey 2.0 National Cooperative Soil Survey 6120/2007 Page 1013 us'" 25 Soil Map-King County Area, Washington (EGGEBRECHT SHORT PL'. T) MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOt) D Area of Interest (AOI) Sotls 0 son Map Units Spacial Point Features '" Blowout Ill! Borrow Pit * Clay Spot • Closed Depression X Gravel Pit ... Gravelly Spot I/lI Landfill A Lava Flow "'" Marsh '" Mine or Quarry ® MisceUaneous water Ii> Perennial Water v Rock Outcrop + Saline Spot Sandy Spot -=-Severely Eroded Spot 0 Sinkhole l> Slide or Slip }IJ SodicSpot 5 Spoil Area 0 Stony Spot Natural Resources Conservation Service III Very Stony Spol .. Wet Spot • Other Special Une Features "" Gully ... Short Steep Slope .... --.. Other PolJtlcal Features Municipalities 0 Cities ill Urban Areas Water Features ~ Ooeans ~ Streams and Callais Transportatton +t+ Roads -,.-vo /V Rails Interstate Highways US Routes State Highwaya Local Roads Other Roads Web Soil Survey 2.0 National Cooperative Soil Survey MAP INFORMATION Original soil survey map sheets were prepared at publication scale. Viewing scale and printing scale, however, may vary from the original. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for proper map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web SoH Survey URl: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Coordinate System: UTM Zone 10N This product is generated from the USDA--NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below, Soil Survey Area: Survey Area Data: King County Area, Washington Version 4, Nov 21, 2006 Date(s) aeriat images were photographed: 711011990; 711811990 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines ¥Jere compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. 612012007 Page 2 of 3 Soil Map-King County Area, Washington Map Unit Legend USDA R5 Map Unit Symbol AgC 1 Totals for Area of Interest (ADI) Natural Resourcos Conservation Service . King County Area, Washington (WA633) Map Unit Name Ac"", In AOI AJdelWoocI gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes Web Soil Survey 2.0 National Cooperative Soil Survey 2.5 2.51 EGGEBRECHT SHORT PLAT Percent of AOI 100.0% 100.0% I 612012007 Page 3 of3 TASK 2.0 -Resource Review 2.1 Introduction The Resource Review portion of this study follows the 2005 KCSWDM. The list of resources for review are identified on Page 2-11 of the manual. During the request for information from King County DOES, it was learned several items were of limited value. Except for the named items, each item was reviewed and the results are listed below. 2.2 Adopted Basin Plan According to Mr. Jim Sanders of the King County DOES, the requirements from the Adopted Basin Plan for this area may be over 1 O-years old and hold .little value for the project analysis. Pertinent findings and recommendations from prior Basin Plans have been incorporated into the 2005 SWDM. (See Appendix A for copy of email.) 2.3 Drainage Studies The Harrison property located at 10856 SE 192 nd Street, Renton is a localized depression just west of the subject parcel. As a result of a variety of drainage complaints, the King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks (DNRP), Water and Land Resources Section, Stormwater Services Section, studied the basin draining to the Harrison parcel. A copy of their report, "Harrison NDAP Study" May 15, 2002 is provided in Appendix D. Properties surrounding the subject parcel (north of SE 192nd Street) have been developed to higher density uses. These developments include detention/water quality systems which would have required drainage studies to justify their design. The drainage reports were not reviewed primarily because those offsite systems do not drain to the site, nor will the drainage from this site affect those projects. 2.4 Basin Reconnaissance Summary Reports According to Mr. Jim Sanders of the King County DOES, the requirements from the Basin Reconnaissance Summary Reports for this area may be over 20-years old and probably hold little value for this project analysis. Pertinent findings and recommendations from these older reports have been incorporated into the 2005 SWDM. (See Appendix A for copy of email.) 2.5 Critical Drainage Areas According to Mr. Jim Sanders of the King County DOES, the requirements from the Adopted Basin Plan for this area may also be over 10-years old and hold little value for this analysis. Pertinent findings and recommendations have been incorporated into the 2005 SWDM. (See Appendix A for copy of emai I.) 2.6 FEMA Maps The FEMA map for the project area is provided on a follOwing page. The project site is not within a flood way or floodplain. 2 2.7 Other Offsite Analysis Reports Other Offsite Analysis Reports may have been included in the drainage reports for the surrounding developments as noted above. However, none were reviewed for the reasons mentioned. 2.8 Sensitive Areas Folio The King County iMAP website was reviewed for sensitive areas near the project site. The specific areas reviewed included: o Wetland Areas o Landslide Hazard Areas 0 Erosion Hazard Areas 0 Groundwater Contamination Hazard Areas 0 Seismic Hazard Areas 0 Coal Mine Hazard Areas 0 Streams 0 Sole Source Aquifer Areas 0 Channel Migration Hazard Areas 0 lOO·year Floodplain Areas 0 Floodways 0 Drainage Complaints 0 Chinook Distribution 0 Sensitive Areas Notice on Title 0 Wildlife Network 0 Shoreline Jurisdiction Areas 0 Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas 0 Water Quality Areas 0 Flow Control Areas 0 CAO Basin Conditions. The specific iMAP product maps for each of these is located in Appendix B. The findings specifically for the project site are summarized as follows: Wetland Areas -None present on·site or nearby. However, small one found to north. Landslide Hazard Areas -None present on·site or nearby. Erosion Hazard Areas -None present on-site or nearby. Groundwater Contamination Hazard Areas -Medium. Seismic Hazard Areas -None present on-site or nearby. Coal Mine Hazard Areas -None present on-site or nearby. Streams -None present on-site or nearby. Sole Source Aquifer Areas -None present on-site or nearby. Channel Migration Hazard Areas -None present on-site or nearby. lOO-year Floodplain Areas -None present on-site or nearby. Floodways -None present on-site or nearby. Drainage Complaints -Many. Chinook Distribution -None present on-site or nearby. Sensitive Areas Notice on Title -None present on-site or nearby. Wildlife Network -None present on-site or nearby. Shoreline Jurisdiction Areas -None present on-site or nearby. Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas -None present on-site or nearby. 3 Water Quality Areas -Basic Water Quality Treatment Flow Control Areas -Flood Problem Flow Control CAO Basin Conditions -Low. 2.9 Drainage Complaints and Studies The area downstream of the project site has been subject to a considerable number of drainage complaints. (See Appendix B -Drainage Complaint Map and Appendix C - Drainage Complaint Summary.) This explains the "Flood Problem Flow Control" status placed on the area. 2.10 Road Drainage Problems No road drainage problems were identified beyond the drainage complaints listed above. Moreover, none were evident in the field. 2.11 Wetlands Inventory As noted above in the Sensitive Areas Folio section, wetlands were not identified near the project site on the iMAP website. However, a wetland reconnaissance by a wetland biologist found wetlands located on the parcel immediately to the north of the subject parcel. Because wetland buffers would impact the site development layout, this wetland was delineated by The Riley Group. (See Appendix E -Wetland Report.) This wetland was determined within the report to be a Category III wetland. Buffers of 75-feet have been established for this wetland class. The wetland and buffers are shown on the project map. 2.12 Migrating River Studies. According to the iMAP Channel Migration Map (Appendix B), the project site is located within an Upper Tributary Basin and no Channel Migration Hazard Areas are shown near the site. Therefore it follows that there are no Migrating River Studies for the project area and none were researched. 4 32 ~ § ~ w ::> z ~ ~ 192ND STREET T23N T22N APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 500 0 500 E3 ES ES NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FLOOO INSURANCE RATE MAP KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 981 OF 1125 lSEE MAP IriOEX rOR PANELS Nor PfUNTEDI ~ PANEL ~ .-~ -, ---, MAP NUMBER 53033C0987 F MAP REVISED: MAY 16.1995 Federal Emergency Managemenl Agency This is an ofIiciai copy of a portion of the aboVe referenced nood map. It was extr<lcted using F-MIT On-Line. This map does not reftect changes or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the title block. For the latest product information about National Aood Insurance Program 'flood mapS check the FEMA Flood Map Store at wwv.r.m8c.fema.gov TASK 3.0 -Field Inspection 3.1 Introduction The site and downstream drainage system was visited at mid·morning on May 24,2007. The weather conditions were sunny and warm. The downstream drainage system is shown on the following map prepared by King County Road Services Division, Road Maintenance Section. Draina e features, descriptions, conditions, and observations from the si I of the dow ream system have been tabulated on the form provided i the,2005 KCSWDM e Appendix F). Although much of the downstream system consists -pIpes, the visible drainage reaches and structures were verified in the field. The downstream system is generally described as a catch basin /pipe network with a length of about 6S0·feet then discharges to a small drainage channel which ultimately makes its way via overland flow to Panther Lake. Specifically, the pipe network flows west for roughly SOO·feet under the north edge of the SE 192 nd Street right·of·way. From here, the pipe system turns due south continuing in pipe for about lS0·feet. The system then discharges into a heavily vegetated small channel which flows southeasterly roughly 11 00· feet to SE 196th Street and crosses under the roadway via an 18·inch culvert. Once clear of the culvert the flow is in an undefined channel that is the wetland on the north end of Panther Lake. The overall travel distance for storm flow from the site to Panther Lake is about 2,SOO·feet. 5 . r '-----_____ . ______ ._L_ f--------1---r-- ! I J I' l.---l.-/ ... i ~ ~ rr- Ir--tL--- I. w (f) <1> > « .c 05 0 -,~ -T .J -, 10---,---+- I I ,------1 L' I ~ 1 i 1__ I ~ f----- I I I I" ~-'2"-Ll,J-:& ® ,,--.... --12_ I 4-.'10 I t I (f) I I I~ J I I '--.. " 1 --. _. . -----::::\( £ i---.:::.______ I '-I '7: E --.. -----~~ " 1___ \ <1> [ ~.l \ -'''ht J .-( :g II 6623400132 l w.. " '" '-i / c: l' 44SE192ND. 1 / :J ~I I ___ ""amd _.-1 , :. ------1 ~--f=-f fL_.-- '-®-I' aLJl/\ I' Q I 1$ 2 L!.I ' -,' -__ I ! ~-& --:--.~-.--.J/ ___ 12-__ -c... •. .12 0 " al~J040120. O'~'I" \ ~1120ClDl~CI o1?oll 01$a" U I j F=aTCI rT~1 I)~ DRAINAGE DATA 11044 SE 192nd St CATCH BASIN PIPE SIZE (INCHES) • CULVERT -10 • OUTFALL -12 ~DITCH -18 011044 SE 19251 PARCEL -24 D PARCEL BOUNDARY -30 --STREET NETWORK -36 N + r------r'-] NO DRAINIliGE MAPPEo.Y I -OFF R1Gr T OF WAY l., ~ I ~--r~1 t .,+--'Orainage has not been mapped for the area behind the legend. File Name: Kg \\T\JdaVeIapmenf\ArCMap\Arcmap ProjectS\11 D44_SEI92.mx<:l o.ta sources: Standard King COUnIy doItaseIS used include: ely, Irans_r>atwork. parcel o 50 100 O::::,:,,·:::ll Feet May 24, 2007 f- I i ._----- t ; ]t!> ; , t t I I .. V Roads dataset! WocIude: black rivet' rp:les data The D'tormation ~ on lhis map has been compiled by King County lIIat1lrom a van.ty of som::es and is sWjact 1o change without noIo::e. King County maJcas no reprnsenlations ct warranli8II, express ct lrrpled, as to 8CClIfaCY, ~eness, limeIlness, ct rights 10 IhII use of such Wormalion. This doetmenI is nol inlended lor use as a SlrJey productKlng CounIy $hall no! be labia tor any general, $peCt'II, indirect incidental, or cor'l$equenlial damages including, but OOI11mHed lo,lost revenues or lost profits rasulllng lrom the use or misuse 01 the inlorma1ion conIalned on this map. Arry sale 01 this map or infonnaliDn on this map is prohibited except by wrinen penrisstln 01 King COcny. NPDES DISCLAIMER: ~ King County Roads Services Olvlsion Road Maintenance Section Tech..,1ogy Unit The drainage data displayed on this map was collected in 1994, 1995, & 1996. Drainage may have been changed and or upgraded to accommodate present surrounding development. ~~----1~-Ir--.0 ; i J(ID I I L 'il E l. t I!L~ 1 ~_I;L ( ~~v 1 -,,-" .. .llI..--'i/ .--~ .... \ \ _\ (' Basin: ( OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL, CORE REQUIREMENT #2 Subbasin Name: Subtiasin Number: 2_L----'z " ~~1:_ J __ t.'-___ -'I4 ... Jc.._!O-113· I" .. .. ' 3 I;z.~ P:P"C " ~ 1,13'-2.00"" .. " 'i p;,p"C. .. II ! Zoo'-"IS'I" ,. • .. ,--/0" ,... uQ'f' 5/'3' 05..., If?<p'''+ -.s~ ... Rc,oo",f ---......... rv .. q ;J D 'C '1(> -S I 3. Z. Sc.G1-;--. 3, "Z. l"oJ .. J '" / 8 p:op f! L"~~s JqZ~J-Iu:.ow .. 513' -"n: NDNG NoNE 110 t)1;f-d, • .',.,'~1 ._, LI. 7 Ie IIS.L-!G.yos-s.", .. p .. IVGf"<! 01+.' ' , 07hA'" rve-. l)P ........ "t .. .,... 5E lID 1'.1 ("73 -1713'" .. " Z$ IS" e:p< JCY~s.So;$-''1''''',,-.$tl~.J1113-/S'2.:?>'·' .. .. ~ \ 1'1.'11:0; 3.2 Reported Problems As noted in Task 2.9 above, there have been a considerable number of drainage complaints in this area. However, most of these complaints occurred prior to the year 2000. In 2002, the King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks, Water and Land Resources Section, Stormwater Services Section, prepared the "Harrison NDAP Study" dated May 15, 2002 (Appendix D). Several recommendations were included in the report. The field review did not find any obvious downstream problems that might exist. The route is flat and keeps flow velocities low, thereby avoiding problems associated with erosion. 3.3 Constriction/Capacity Limitations Along the route there was no evidence suggesting constriction or capacity limitations that might occur as a result of this project. 3.4 Existing / Potential Downstream Drainage Problems The field walk did not identify any existing or potential downstream drainage problems that might occur as a result of this project. 3.5 Existing / Potential Overtopping Scouring, Bank Sloughing, or Sedimentation Problems The field walk did not identify any existing or potential downstream overtopping, scouring, bank sloughing, or sedimentation problems that might occur as a result of this project. 3.6 Significant Destruction of Aquatic Habitat or Organisms (eg., severe siltation, bank erosion, or incision in stream) There was no indication of any kind of any destruction of habitat or organisms along the downstream route. 3.7 Existing Land Use, Impervious Surfaces, Topography, and Soil Types The existing land use north of SE 192 nd Street is largely developed with urban·density single-family homes and apartments. Pockets of large lot home sites are interspersed. South of SE 192 nd Street the existing land use is typically large lot residences and businesses. The impervious surfaces north of SE 192 nd Street might be roughly guessed at 40-50%. South of SE 192 nd Street the impervious coverage estimate is probably closer to 5-10%. Topography of the area is very gentle with slopes of under 5% along the full downstream route. Soil types according to the soil survey for the majority of the area, both upstream and downstream are Alderwood (symbol AgC) series. In those downstream areas where more deposition occurs as a result of the runoff, the soils are listed as Tukwila series 6 (symbol Tu), Norma (symbol No), and Seattle series (symbol Sk), particularly around Panther Lake. The soil types are generally described in the soil survey as follows: • Alderwood -moderately well drained gravelly, sandy, upland soils in glacial deposits with a weak to strong consolidation at 2-3 feet deep. These soils occur with slopes of 6-15%; • Tukwila -very poorly drained organic soils formed in wet basins of upland depressions with slopes of 0-1%; • Norma -poorly drained soils typically formed in alluvium areas, generally located in glaciated uplands with slopes of 0-2%; • Seattle -very poorly drained organic soils formed in depressions on glacial till plain with slopes of 0-1%. 3.8 Downstream Drainage System Features Please refer to Section 3.1 and Appendix F for a description of the Downstream Drainage System Features including pipe sizes, channel characteristics, drainage structures, and relevant critical areas. 3.9 Tributary Basins The basins tributary to the site and the downstream system are shown in Appendix H. The King County Drainage Basins Map is located on the next page. 7 EGGEBRECHT SHORT PLAT -KING '-'VLJI~ legend ,0' County Boundary 0 King County Drainage Basins Highways ;.1 Shoreline Reaches Streets 0 Lakes and Large Rivers p lIigh"")' , Streams l;I.~ .(.21;7 Arterials '" Incorporated Area 0·~"·> ""'" Shaded Re lief TASK 4.0 -Drainage System Description and Problem Descriptions 4.1 Introduction The drainage system for this project will collect runoff from the access road and single family lots and route it to a water quality / detention vault. The discharge from this vault will be connected to the pipe located within the right of way at SE 192 nd Street. It is probable that a separate bypass pipe will need to be constructed to convey any overflows from the wetland area through the project site. This will also connect to the drainage pipes in 19Z nd • 4.2 Drainage System Descriptions The collection system for runoff from the project will consist of rain leaders from homes and catch basins in the paved areas, particularly in the proposed culdesac. Underground pipes will convey the collected runoff to a combination water quality / detention vault. This vault with discharge via pipes and connect to the storm pipe system in SE 19Z nd Street. 4.3 Problem Descriptions Aside from the drainage complaints at the Harrison parcel, there did not appear to be any problems with the downstream system. However, the area has a "Flood Problem Flow Control" designation and so the detention system will be designed to meet the requirements of this criteria. The water quality system will be a simple wet vault and will meet the "basic" water quality control needs for the site. 8 TASK 5.0 -Mitigation of Existing or Potential Problems 5.1 Introduction Although downstream drainage problems were evident in the 1990's due to the number of complaints, no recent complaints have been logged by King County. The project will not mitigate for specific downstream existing or potential problems, except by meeting the performance criteria listed for the "Flood Problem Flow Control" area. 9 APPENDICES A. Jim Sanders Email to Peter Gonzales, May 18, 2007 B. iMAP Website Product Maps, May 2007 C. Drainage Complaint Summary D. Harrison NDAP Study, King Co. DNRP, May 15, 2002 E. Wetland Report, The Riley Group, May, 2007 F. Off-site Analysis Drainage System Table G. Water Quality and Quantity Calculations H. Existing and Developed Conditions Maps Page 1 of3 Pete Gonzales --------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Sanders, Jim [Jim_Sanders@METROKC.GOVj Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 10:06 AM To: pete@pyramidengrg.com Cc: Cheshier, Beth; Gauthier, Don Subject: RE: Request for information Pete: Thank you for your inquiry about drainage studies and mapping at DOES to perform a level one downstream analysis for your project. You also stated you were surprised no one was available at DOES that you could talk to on this. I tried to contact you today regarding this matter and rather than contact Beth at this time, here is some guidance that may help you in obtaining the information you need for your short plat submittal. Of the specific studies and maps you listed are needed, not all may be applicable for your project. For example the Basin Reconnaissance Summary Reports are so old (circa 1987) that we would see little value in reviewing that information for your analysis. The same is true for the adopted drainage plans that are more than 10 years old. For the most part, the pertinent findings and recommendations compiled in those studies have been incorporated into the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM). Also, critical drainage areas are not applicable to projects that fall under the 2005 SWDM. Most mapping needs you listed are available online. By using our iMap application, you can map floodways, floodplains, critical (sensitive) areas, including wetlands, streams, steep slopes, landslide hazards and river migration areas. You can find a link to iMap from the County's home page at www.metrokc.gov. You can also map drainage complaints and then research them online to see if they apply to your project. As you perform you field check and walk the downstream path, you may be able to identify properties in the vicinity with recent projects that may have detailed drainage studies. Again from iMap you can check the parcels for permit numbers and then contact our Records Center at 206-296-6719 to schedule a time to view the project files and their Technical Information Reports_ As Don had indicated in his message to you, help for walk-in inquiries and questions at DOES is Iimited_ In additionally, we don't have a library of resources and studies that are available for public viewing. However, if you ever have questions on any requirement in the drainage manual or how to interpret them, you can call for help at the WLRD number set up for this: 206-296-1900. At DOES, we do provide staff resource assistance to the Permit Center between 8:30 and 10:30_ But that time is limited to 9 to 15 minutes per customer for answering general questions about processing requirements and standards. If more time is needed, then we can and recommend that you set up a 'voluntary' pre-application meeting to address those. I hope you find this infonmation helpful. If not, feel free to contact me at 206-296-7178. Jim Sanders, Development Engineer Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-7178 From: Gauthier, Don Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 11 :44 AM To: Pete Gonzales Cc: Sanders, Jim; Cheshier, Beth Subject: RE: Request for information Pete: I appreciate your inquiry and allowing us to help you with this request. Apparently the person at the Reception 5/2212007 Page 2 of3 desk did not understand that there was a subdivision in process and routed you to the Building Services Division , (BSD) Site Engineering Staff Engineers in BSD do not review subdivisions of property and because our objective ) is to approve building permits, BSD Engineers are only available to help the public from 8:30 to 10:30 am daily. , ThiS allows the BSD Engineers time to process, review and approve submitted bUilding permits that comply with King County Code (KCG) within a timely manner. Assuming that the short subdivision has preliminary approval and that a Land Use Services Division (LUSD) Engineer was assigned to it, the best person to request this information is the LUSD Engineer. If this is not the situation and Preliminary Approval has not been granted you would want to request this information from one of the LUSD staff. Often Beth Cheshier is the LUSD staff person that can help you, Beth's telephone number is (206) 296-7187 and her email address is beth.cheshier@metrokc.gov. Please contact Beth or Jim Sanders, the LUSD Engineering Review Supervisor for your request. I have included both of them in this email reply to help them understand your request and the routing of it thus far. Donald S, Gauthier, CFM Senior Engineer Building Services Division Department of Development and Environmental Services OAK-DE-0100 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 (206) 296-7181 Fax (206) 296-7225 Email: don,gauthier@metrokc.gov From: Pete Gonzales [mailto:pete@pyramidengrg.com] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 1:58 PM To: Gauthier, Don Subject: Request for information Mr. Gauthier, I am preparing a Level 1 Drainage Analysis for a 9-lot short plat at 11044 SE 192nd Street, Renton, WA 98055. As you know, the Level 1 requires a variety of information, most of which, according to the SWM Manual, is available at DOES. I visited DDES this morning hoping to efficiently collect the necessary information and data, but was told there was no help available with drainage questions because the drainage engineers are only available until 10:30 each day, I was surprised that I was not able to talk to someone who might be able to help me assemble the information for this study. However, I was told to contact you to see if it could be arranged. I will need the following to complete the Drainage Analysis: Adopted basin plan Finalized drainage studies Basin Reconnaissance Summary Reports Critical Drainage Area Maps Floodplainlfloodway maps Offsite analysis reports Sensitive Areas folio Wetlands inventory map, and Migrating River Studies. If there is someone else I should speak with or a process I need to follOW to secure this data, please let me know. Thank you. Pete Gonzales 5/22/2007 Legend -I I- County Boundary Streets Shaded Relief x Mountain Peaks ~ Itigh...., CAO Shoreline Condition £~9 Art_Is '" tv High Locol 1'-/ Modium , Parcels L.~ ... , tv Lc>w 0 Lakes and Large Rivers Highways " Streams I'i' ;V Incorporated Area m SAO Wetland Legend -I I- County Boundary Streets Shaded Relief X Mountain Peaks ~ lIigh'Ml)' CAO Shoreline Condition ~Vr{ .. Anario!. {/::I ~ High l.o<:al ;vi Modium Parcels ,# Low 0 Lakes and Large Rivers Highways /\./ Streams j'/ Incorporated Area ~ SAO La nds lide Legend -I 1- County Boundar)' Streets Shaded Relief X Mountain Peaks JI.' Highway CAO Shoreline Condition ~' Artarials 1ft;. tif ltigl1 LoGII rI Modium Parcels -_. ~ Low 0 Lakes and Large Rivers Highways .A/' Streams .' j'/ Incorporated Area SAO Erosion _-,~;":, __ ",:",-,, •. ~,,--,. ': ".',-.e,", _. "'-''',_J_, .".::'" '< '~'>-"o",,_,,_,' ,,,",,,,,,_,, ci".~,_>-i';;d··_-','f·:" __ "i',,:"·': __ ',I:""<:":'--'i'~\.,.<''''''-''',):' '~I"~;-:)~f~'-"-' 1:;i/::~"IEG9~.~.~IE~,~J~,i1P~!:,f~~T:~',~AOqt~YQ:~~'~!~f">;', ••• ~ -I I- County Boundary X Mountain Peaks CAO Shoreline Condition p tligh /,.1 Modium ;if Low Highways J'/ Incorporated Area Streets (conti Legend Arterials Parcels I I Lakes and Large Rivers 1',.,/ Streams Areas Susceptable to Groundwater Contamination Low (cont) Modium lIigh Shaded Relief Legend -I I- County Boundary Streets Shaded Relief X Mountain Peaks ~' lIigh_ CAO Shoreline Condition ,j Anar'" It""' ~ lIigh I.oGaI r'~'--Parcels ;V Madium ~ Low 0 Lakes and Large Rivers Highways "~,,, Streams ,.' j'/ Incorporated Area ~ SAO Seismic Legend -I I- County Boundary Streets Shaded Relief X Mountain Peaks ~ Ilig hwar CAO Shoreline Condition ,lft:V .6.nariols fll.l' ... P tligh 1.0<:01 14/ Medium Parcels tif Low 0 Lakes and Large Rivers Highways /./ , Streams ;V Incorporated Area lHIl SAO Coal Mine Legend -I I- county Boundary Streets j<I C .... 2S.lmonid X Mountain Peaks P-Iligb-r ;./ C .... l CAO Shoreline Condition ~ AliOTO .. Unclossifiad t./ lIigh Local 0 Lakes and Large Rivers ,-' ~, -" ,r-I" "odium ! Parcels / .. ,/ Streams ,..,~""'" l "" Low SAO Stream Shaded Relief Highways ~ Closs 1 ;V Incorporated Area Closs 2 ...... nn;;,1 {contI legend -I I- County Boundary Streets Shaded Relief X MoLlntain Peaks P.' Uighway CAO Shoreline Condition ,~ Anarioll5 ;;':.(~ (;',..= I" Iligh local ".,-, ,;if' Madium Parcels ~ Low II Lakes and Large Rivers L ... .J Highways /,,./ Streams # Incorporated Area ~ Sole Source Aquifer Legend -I I- County Boundary Streets • "OD!:RAT~ X Mountain Peaks ,ff..'" ltighW<ry • S[V"Rt CAO Shoreline Condition f! A.rtOTia~ Shaded Relief ii~~ p lIigh Local •• j€ "'odium Parcels .t'~'" -............. t-I .--, Lakes and Large Rivers Low !_J Highways /"'." Streams , ;V Incorporated Area Channel Migration Hazard Areas Legend -I 1- County Bounda ry Streets Shaded Relief X Mountain Peaks ,J Iligbwar CAO Shoreline Condition IJ"" '" .. ~f Artariais ,{Je ,J lIigb Local ;if Modium , Parcels <"', •. ", tif Low 0 lakes and large Rivers Highways /,." Streams # Incorporated Area 0 100 Year Floodplain Legend -I I- County Boundary Streets Shaded Relief X Mountain Peaks ,;t~ Hig~W3)' CAO Shoreline Condition ,lit;~:f Artorial> :1i ....- rI lIigh La<:al ,..,.""", Parcels Modium ... ,.,,". tV ,.-----; Lakes and Large Rivers LO'N ._' Highways "".' Streams jV Incorporated Area ~ Floodway Legend -I I- County Boundary Streets Shaded Relief x Mountain Peaks ttl flilJb_ CAO Shoreline Condition ,~ {$) Anariais i":tl ri' lIilJh Lacoi ,,0; f: Modlum Parcels ~ Low ,--, Lakes and Large Rivers -' Highways ,-,.,' Streams ;V Incorporated Area lila Drainage Complaints Legend -I I- County Boundary Streets Shaded Relief X Mountain Peaks .iii lIig"_ CAO Shoreline Condition ~--~ Arter .... F t/ lIigh Local ,,-/ Modium Parcels ,J Low '-1 Lakes and Large Rivers L, Highways , •. / .' . Streams j'/ Incorporated Area 1m Chinook Distribution Legend -, ,-County Boundary Streets Shaded Relief X Mountain Peaks F# Hig!1_ CAO Shoreline Condition ./tl Anoriois ;if lIigll LoCal i~ • .i' Madium Parcels i '-.-."".,,~. ~ Law 0 Lakes and Large Rivers Highways J".~/ Streams , f'/ Incorporated Area • Sensitlve Area Notice on Title Legend -I I- County Boundary Streets Shaded Relief x Mountain Peaks ~' Il;ghw:rr CAO Shoreline Condition .#'" '" At1ar~ls 19.>' i: r/ lI;gh LOClII Af Modium Parcels tv' Low ""," Wi Id life Network ~--Lakes and Large Rivers Highways I # Incorporated Area /",' Streams ,.,. , EGGEBRECHT SHORT PLAT -SHORELINE JURISDICTION ) legend r' County Boundary 1"'-'" , L ___ ) Federal /0"./ Streams Trails 0 PorIIDimioI jV Incorporated Area ;V P~Trail 0 School Districl: ~ Shoreline Jurisdiction ;V On Strocrt 1 r.ail 0 OlhGf Go¥crrunel11 Shaded Relief ," Soft Surf""" T RlU Highways ••• Surf~ Un:known Streets • Parks .iI< Ihgh_ ij"'" ~ Kin; Coun1)' Parks ;t Artariats ,,,'-"" 0 County Locoi City 1'/ Shoreline Reaches D -. 0 Lakes and Large Rivers (cont) .. . , EGGEBRECHT SHORT PLAT -CRITICAL AQUI RECHARGE AREA Legend -I County Boundary )/",,/. Swams ~j'. '. C"'''II'''I'2 1-"" • .::,. F Highways Channel Migration Hazard Cat"llory3 f'/ Incorporated Area Areas Shaded Relief Streets III MODEAATt ~ H;gn_ II1II SEVBU: £i~' Artarim fit SAO Wetland " LDGoI CfitiGal Aquiler ReGharge Area 0 lak .... and large Rivera rn C_ .... 1 (cont) -I 1- # !i; s,!! L~ 0 EGGEBRECHT SHORT PLAT -SWDM WATER QUALITY Cowlty BoundaIy Highway& Incorporated Area Streets High_ Artariols ...... 1 Lake& and Large Riven; \, " Legend /''0'/ Streams Cllannel I'Iligration Hazard Areas II1II MOOERA TE III SEVERE Iii! SAO Wetland SWDM Water Quality emit: WaurQuality Traa1wm1 (contI I) Sonsitmt L* lJ'1Ytmlnt o Bog DroinogaAnll Shaded Relief ) MAR. 21. 2007 \: 28PM K I Nii W WLKU ltv. J" J I, I King County Water and Land Resources (WLR) Divisioll . 20 I S Jacksou St, Suite 600 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 FAX Date: ~ Number'Ofpages including cover sheet: __ From: Cindy Torkelson WLR Stonnwater Services Section Phone:206·296-19Q0 Fax Number: 206·296·0192 . '1WlPORT ANT I.EVEI,'1 ANALYSIS NO'TE: We do not send copies of certain complaint types tllat are not relevant such as BCW, FI, FIR, FIH and WQA, and we do not send CL and LS types. See key below. Type S 1, S2 and S3 will not be faxed due to size constraints. The following is a list of complaint types received by the Water and Land Resources Stonnwater Services Section. Complaint numbelS beginning prior to 1990-XXXX have been archived and 1I1'C. no longer in our possession. They can still be retrieved, if necessary, but wiII take additional time and may not be beneficial to your research due to their age. development which has occurred, etc. If you are interested ill reviewing the actual complaints, they can be pulled (time permitting) fur your review. Copies can be obtained for S' .15 per page, and $2.00 per page forplaus. ~ Type of Inmtintion C AaJon I\tq"'" sew BIISI ..... • fora ... W .... CCI' Rtspom"o Inquir7 ·eL Calm EH Enf ...... "'t on Hold ER. Eutoroanenl Review . FCC.FCR,fCS FaoUilY Compialnto 1'1 SWM F .. I.quky FIR. SWM Fee Review FIll SWM F<e On lIold 'J.S la_ M facility Engineer"" !\tviow NOA Nelpbotlu>nd IlrolDaIl" ..... _ WQC WaII:r Quolity ComplRiD. WQE W .... Quality Enf .... cmettt WQR W_ Quolhy EnElnootl.g Rev ... WQA W_ Q\lalil)' Alldil WOO WU Q\lality -0Ih0< S 1.S2.SNl Eo1Ci.ooriJlg Studios 111 of Problem DDM DDS DLE DTA !NQ MMA MMI' MMO MMt.\ MNM MNw S~ WQB' WQD: . WQI REM aRT NWD DneloplDCDTICon$U'\lction Orahdgo -Miscdlmccnlf Ilft!Inog. -En>.illlllS.dh .. .,tIIt\"" O<>lnqe -u"d,Jidalllo,1II Me...,on. Dr'; •• T<chalcal AnlslllllCe O<olnage -Gcncrlllnquiry Mt ...... ""· AmhoUc:a ~lntenOncc -Plood1ag Maintenance· 0eI1er1l Maintr:nau.cc . Mo\lti.q Malnt .... co -Needs Mllnlcnan" MaInlcn ..... Noxiou'Wccdl SWM """ Quostio .. W_ Qu.UIy -B." MI."S,,1I0'" P,oc~"", WIIOt Q.oU1y -OumplnB ~ Watt{ Quality-UUckCom18ttion SWM """ .I\orm= ....... "" SWM Fe<-GtInt SWM Pce-New DisooIn)t ~AR. 21. 2007 1: 28PM --KING CU. WLKU IW. J',) I, L KING COUNTY SURFAC::: WATER MANAGEMENT O:VISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT Page 1: INVESTIGATION REQUEST Type -==~=--_ " : .. ReceNed by;: I"-l'i.V ,,... '_a _____ .::..-____ .. .. :.0810:.: 2J6'IAkOK'd~ 1f4_ .. ~ile~o .. qfo:..f~l_ . Received 1,0m::. ~Pte~se print plainly for scanniflo). (Cay)' . (Ev'l NAME: ~rtAc.e. ~vV\ ~Ot'\ PHONE g:-:d-'Z('iO _ .. __ ~·>~'AODR~SS:~~tO:...:~~5~(P:::... _<;.=:..:::::£.::......:!;....:q:.=z.::...rd_._~_+-_~ __ City. R{.AII.tor-.l. Stale_. _ z;pq8{}5~ '. :: L~catlon of problem. if different: ... _ .. __ ._--_ .. _-----_. --.-..-.:.--;.. Reponed P,cblem: . '. M~. '~~oy\ (2icle~& ~<% fUvn·· ~~M1!UMdlh,5 NuN 'Deve1.fJ'Pm~5 j~,rt5 "L¥ in ..f'liIe. .(}Jre().. •. Mo~ ~ ~. c,/h'V\IL.a.\OiVl·~·d.'t.e. ~ ~~ . BII\b.f-.. W~ 'l~ bbbllv..j ~~" ih:-: ~. ~ci . Ovnd C~[VI~ ?ol>I~If\~ in h;~ \o.t\~ JD.;Vd ov: ~ NbV-j.~· S~-e-ethls; p~. \.k oJ~o ho.s· wo..k ()..nfu ~'fS hl1\A..se;: t0~~ CfAN:., .k, olOV\oe. o.bov.,f--}tU;, ? aISPOSITION,: TUrned 10 .J;tJ on .....-~d agency has be~n no:ifieC: . ¥-,. .r rool:llem has been correcled, _ No problem has ;,een icientliicd. Pri·,,;e problem· NDM' will nor considel bece:J;e: Waler originates onslle 2nd/or on neignbo:ing p2rcel Location is outside SW'M Service Area. • Slack No: . . or:: No fWi:her action recomr:'ler,de-j bat frior invesrioat:oi\ seoressos pro: -SltFilo # _. . _ Other (Specify): MAR. 21. 2007 1: 29PM KING CO. WLK~ --.-'-' ... -" c:romplaiDl96-o137 Ha!rifon. Bnlc:e iJM:stigated by Doug Doblcills on 3-5-96 11V, ],,') 1. J I mel with Mr. Hanison to discuss his COlIc:ems about the water on the backside ofhis JlIopeIty !bat be cl1lims is cauSed by new'deveIopmcIII: in the area. Mr. Harrison tms at the bottom of a low area off of sa 192ad. The HaniSOD JlIoper\y IeCeives surliIa: IUIIOfffrom the propenies to the DOrth, east and west. approx. 100 feet 1II1tIh of his home ill the backyard there is 8 5prIng that 6UdIiI:es causing WatCl to pood and 511_ his gardeB and walkways. Mr. 'fIarrisoD c1aiIIIs this _ a>meS from the plat of CbiDquapjJI Ridge to the east ofbim. The water from the plat is mostly colltlliud ill the SIOnD draillBgC B)'SImII iDSta1led by the plat. Mr. B.anisoJI may recc:t.e aome mfaI;c flows from the plill of ChinquapJD from the backyatd nmaff. This has been a problem for Mr. Harrison frOlllIiO.mOdmG DOw. We have comp\aiDts from Mr. Harrison dating back to 3-4-91 complaillfng about the same prob\em. TIlls i. before the plat of ClWlquapin Ridge..as bllilt Mr. Hmisoo once again complained about this plOblem on 1- 31-92. This complaint was thco put iD10 the NDA program and iDspocted by DeIiUl KoIcr on II-1M1. De1iIe Killer made a """,mm"1ldal!op to do a IIbidy 10 find out what was c:&U$ing the problBIDS on the Haniscm property. A NDA study was stane4 by Sue CIarlce-Mole. Sue CJarke..More started the study aDd pot the study on hold a1Ier abe IIIlbd 10 Mr. Hanison about the scope of the study and the roads project that was to be c:onstnJcted in the 1IJtum. AmmIlDg to Sue ClaJb..Mono this stu4y was put on bold beca_ Mr. Hmisoo WIIJIIai to wait to see if the Road Project 011 SB 192Dd would llIhe care of biB problem. Now in 1996 Mr. Hanisan still has the COIIl:CI1l about thB 5811Jl1lled bacII:yard and the lOads project on SB 192Dd still is DOt buill I dld 8OIIID'rese:uch on the Roads Project onl92Dd and fOUDd that is scIIeduJal to be buill ill the year 2000. TIle project has be"1l scaled down to tIuee laDes wilh curb gutter and ~ The coDlBCt peraoD IlIr this project is Eric BeckmaI\ the projec:t IIIIUIalItr for Roads lOS- 5220. 1 talkccI to Lany Geule about this oomp1ai1ll on 3-21-96. Lany WIllIS 10 reopen a study an this drainage ooncern 1kOder this oomplaint number. The stully would only cover the backside of Mr. RaniSOD'. property. 1 called and left a meliSllge for Mr. HlInisolI explaiDiog that the stndy \hat_ , ~ in 1993 wuuId be reopened to address his ooocems about the waIel on his property. " . . '" , . . + + • . . I> . . SUlIJ'ACBFLOW ........ DrrCHFLOW •• SWALBF1.0W __ MAR. 21. 2007 1:29PM Complaint 98-0123 Haniscm Investigated by Pat SimmOlU 03/02198 I met wifh Mr. HIIIrisoD ~ the wcmess ofhis yard and the area sWl'OlllldiDg this low porcol. 1 fOllDd that the bad yard oChis home wlIS saturated with water 8IId water ..... flowing into a yard drain. He bad iosIalled • interCeptOr linin • nwnber of years ago that connecred the yurd drain to the erosa pipe under SE 192" St ThcH: w .. walel flowing trough Ibe pipe 00 tho day of my visit The walet DOW ~omcS from the west and North as the IIO\V development to the East intcn:epts all.mface flow and c:anveys them Ibrough tile detention system into the tross pipe. The grOWld water is not getting into the interceptOr ~. . Mr. Hmrisnn problcms remain the sam .• in the grouad water and surface flows are keeping his bad< yard vory wol. The COIIveyance system that he cOQllrUCII:d is not addressins the is.lle on collecting the ground and surface _ and moving it to the ftont and acroJ!S the road. The aoaly.is Cor the ford property atltes that the system em the road would handle the inae ... flows . fi'om an effi:rctIvc collectiOD system. The development that has occurred to the East shOllld have little effect OD his property. r;:Dram GIII'dc. . Area \J ~ ~ Ford Development WctArea Driveway Dctebtloo PODd 18" Cone SE 1910 ' St. Pete Gonzales Wtthf5 ? tl1J' ])!2-fVJ;V I/<-rrs-COM/' L-A-I",vTI 1m: .:nt: To: Torkelson, Cindy [Cindy.Torkelson@METROKC.GOV] Wednesday, March 21,200710:13 AM pete@pyramidengrg.com Subject Thomas Search.xls (32 KB) Level 1 «Thomas Search.xls» IMPORTANT LEVEL 1 ANALYSIS NOTE: We do not send copies of certain complaint types that are not relevant such as BeW, FI, FIR, FIH and WQA, and we do not send CL and LS types. See key below. Type Sl, 82 and 83 will not be faxed due to size constraints 4 The following is a list of complaint types received by the Water and Land Resources Division Stormwater Services Section. Complaint numbers beginning prior to 1990-XXXX have been archived and are no longer in our possession. They can still be retrieved, if necessary, but will take additional time and may not be beneficial to your research due to their age, development which has occurred, etc. If you are interested in reviewing the actual complaints, they can be pulled (time permitting) for your review. Copies can be obtained for $ .15 per page, and $2.00 per page for plans. Keys: Type of Investigation Problem C Action Request Development/Construction BCW Business' for Clean Water rainage -Miscellaneous CCF Response to Inquiry DES Drainage -ErOSion/Sedimentation *CL Claim Drainage -Landslide/Earth Movement EH Enforcement on Hold DTA Technical Assistance ER Enforcement Review INQ Drainage -General Inquiry FCC,FCR,FCS Facility Complaints MMA Maintenance -Aesthetics Type of DCA DDM DLE Drainage FI SWM Fee Inquiry MMF Maintenance -Flooding FIR SWM Fee Review MMG Maintenance -General FIH SWM Fee on Hold MMM Maintenance -Mowing *LS Lawsuit MNM Maintenance -Needs Maintenance RR Facility Engineering Review MNW Maintenance-Noxious Weeds NDA Neighborhood Drainage Assistance SWF SWM Fee Questions WQC water Quality Complaint WQB Water Quality -Best Management Practices WQE Water Quality Enforcement WQD Water Quality -Dumping WQR Water Quality Engineering Review WQI ''later Quality -Illicit Connection WQA Water Quality Audit REM SWM Fee -Remeasurement WQO Water Quality -Other GRT SWM Fee-Grant 1 Printed: 03/211200710:11:15AM COMP_NO TYPE PROBLEM Address Text49 COMMENTS TB 1996-0137 C RUN OFF SE 10856 192NO ST C OFFSITE FLOW FROM UPBASIN DEVELOPMENT 68600 1996-0137 SNI RUN OFF SE 10856 192ND ST C ADJ DEV MAY HELP REDUCE OFF-SITE FLOW 68600 1996-0243 C DRNG 19631121ST AVE SE C DOWNSTREAM IMPACT SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT 686000 1996-0805 C DRNG 19400 120TH AVE SE C DRAINGE FLOW QUESTION DEVELOP INFO 68600 1996-1154 C RID POND 18848111TH PL SE C WET BACK YARD FOR FORESTED AREA 68600 1996-1233 C FLOG 19910 118TH AVE SE C GROUNDWATER IMPACT TO PVT PROP 686000 1996-1584 C DRNG 18908113THWAYSE C PRIVATE PROPERTY IMPACT TO PVT DRNG 68600 1996-1613 C FLOG 19910 118TH AVE SE C ROOF DRNS PLUGGED PVT PROB 686000 1996-2115 C DRNG SE 10856192ND ST C NO VISIT CLOSE TO 96-0137 68600 1997-0092 C VEGETATI SE 10810 196TH ST C PMT NEEDED 2 CLR DTCH? CL K.ZIMMERMAN 686000 1997-0271 C FLOG SE 11007196TH ST C WETLAND PONDING LAKE OUTLET ELEV 686000 1997-0749 C DRAINAGE 19422 108TH AVE SE C GRADING ACTIVITY IMPACT PVT PROP 686000 1997-0860 C DRAINAGE 20248 106TH AVE SE C SATURATED SOIL MAYBE SEWER OR WATER PR 686000 1997-1083 C STRM DRN 19605106TH AVE SE C SEWER MAINT ACTIVITY FENCE DAMAGE 686000 1997-1123 C GRADING 18908113THWAY SE C PVT PROP IMPACT NO DRNG INSTALLED 68600 1997-1123 R GRADING 18908113THWAY SE C PVT PROP IMPACT NO DRNG INSTALLED 68600 1997-1325 C CB SE 10859 192ND ST C BRICK BUILT CB UNDERMINED BY SPRING FLO 68600 1997-1325 NDA CB SE 10859 192ND ST C BRICK BUILT CB UNDERMINED BY SPRING FLO 68600 1997-1325 R CB SE 10859 192ND ST C BRICK BUILT CB UNDERMINED BY SPRING FLO 68600 1997-1335 FCR MAINT. SE 11129189TH PL C NEW FAC. MAINT NEEDS OWNERSHIP QUESTION 68600 1997-1550 C FLOODING 19631121ST AVE SE C PVT PROP IMPACTS UPBASIN DEVELOPMENT 686000 1997-1550 R FLOODING 19631121STAVESE C PVT PROP IMPACTS UPBASIN DEVELOPMENT 686000 • 1997-1550 SI FLOODING 19631 121ST AVE SE C PVT PROP IMPACTS UPBASIN DEVELOPMENT 686000 1991Hl019 C DRAINAGE 19016116TH AVE SE C NEW GRAVEL RD POSSIBLE PVT PROP IMP 68600 1998-0058 C DRAINAGE 18820 116TH AVE SE C SFR CONST IMPACTING ADJACENT PROP 68600 1998-0123 C DRAINAGE SE 10856 192ND ST C OFFSITE FLOW IMPACTING PVT PROP 68600 1998-0215 C DRAINAGE 19605106TH AVE SE C BERM CONST ALLEGED IMPACT TO PVT PROP 686000 1998-0898 R DRAINAGE 19221 108TH AVE SE C REQUEST TO REALIGN DRAINAGE CHANNEL 68600 1999-0306 C DRAINAGE SE 11618188TH ST C ADJACENT PROP PAVED 2500 SQ FT 68600 1999-0649 X FLOODING SE 11007 196TH ST C OLLIE BURTON PROBLEM 686000 1999-0723 C DRAINAGE 19620 106TH AVE SE C ROAD DITCH PROBLEM 686000 1999-0812 WOC DUMPING 19238 107TH AVE SE C REQU FOR INFO MCL NO DUMPING IDENTIFIED 68600 2000-0523 FCR MMG 18631 106TH AVE SE C FENCE AROUND RID POND DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF VEHICLE DAMAGE 68600 2000-0572 C DDM ACROSS FROM 19029 120TH AVE SE C APPARENT FILLING OF ROADSIDE DITCH. NO PERMITS. CULVERT OR APPROVALS 68600 2000-0572 R DDM ACROSS FROM 19029 120TH AVE SE C APPARENT FILLING OF ROADSIDE DITCH. NO PERMITS. CULVERT OR APPROVALS 68600 REQUEST TO CLEAR OUTLET CHANNEL FROM PANTHER LAKE. HISTORIC PROBLEM 2000-0660 C DDM SE 10810 196TH ST C PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED. RFD TO MASON BOWLES 686000 CONCERN REGARDING OUTLET CHANNEL PANTHER LAKE. PREVIOUSLY INVESTIGATED 2000-0670 C DDM SE 10647 196TH ST C UNDER 00-0660 686000 GROUNDWATER DISCHARGE OVER SIDEWALK. CAN WATER BE INTERCEPTED AND 2001-0181 C DDM 119THAVESE&SE 196TH C DISCHARGED TO DRAINAGE SYSTEM? 686000 OFFSITE FLOW ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY. LACK OF ADEQUATE CONVEYANCE CAUSES 2001-0360 FCC MMG SE 12025196TH ST C WATER TO POND ON COMPLAINANT'S PROPERTY 686000 OFFSITE FLOW ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY. LACK OF ADEQUATE CONVEYANCE CAUSES 2001-0360 NDA-CMMG SE 12025 196TH ST 0 WATER TO POND ON COMPLAINANT'S PROPERTY 686000 OFFSITE FLOW ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY. LACK OF ADEQUATE CONVEYANCE CAUSES 2001-0360 R MMG SE 12025 196TH ST C WATER TO POND ON COMPLAINANT'S PROPERTY 686000 2001-0547 WQP WOP SE 11010 192ND 0 68600 2001-0707 C DDM SE 10621 196TH ST C STORM EVENT: FLOODING OF PROPERTY AND GARAGE ALSO NEIGHBORING PROPERTIE 686000 2001-0707 NDA-CDDM SE 10621 196TH ST 0 STORM EVENT: FLOODING OF PROPERTY AND GARAGE ALSO NEIGHBORING PROPERTIE 686000 2001-0707 R DDM SE 10621 196TH ST C STORM EVENT: FLOODING OF PROPERTY AND GARAGE ALSO NEIGHBORING PROPERTIE 686000 2001-0762 C DDM SE 11214196TH ST C FLOODING OF PASTURE AND PROPERTY. REFERENCE OLLIE BURTON STUDY 686000 2001-0843 C DDM 19620 106TH AVE SE C ALLEGED FLOODING OF DIW AND YARD. COMPLAINANT INDICATES EXISTING DIW CULVE 686000 2002-0045 WOC WQD W OF 108TH AVE NE & S OF SE 192ND S-C DUMPING OF BOX SPRING INTO PANTHER CREEK. 218/02 UPDATE: MATTRESS REMOVED 68600 2002-0344 C DDM 18919111TH PL SE C APPARENT DOWNSTREAM RESTRICTION OR PIE ELEVATION REDUCING STORAGE CAPAC 68600 2002-0344 RET DDM 18919111TH PL SE C APPARENT DOWNSTREAM RESTRICTION OR PIE ELEVATION REDUCING STORAGE CAPAC 68600 2002-0379 FCR MNM 18631 106TH AVE SE C 2 SHOPPING CARTS THROWN INTO POND. POND MOWED RECENTLY. DEBRIS NOT YET 168600 2002-0553 C DTA 19013114TH CT SE C CONCERN REGARDING POSSIBLE SLOUGHING OF YARD ADJACENT TO OPEN SPACE TRA 68600 2002-0558 FCR MNW 18631106TH AVE SE C REQUEST TO REMOVE TANSY RAGWORT FROM POND AREA 68600 2002-0560 FCR MNW 19250 117TH PL SE C REQUEST TO REMOVE TANSY RAGWORT FROM POND AREA 686000 2002-0713 FCR MNM 18927 111TH PL SE C TRACT B VEGETATION GROWTH RESTRICTS ABILITY TO MOW. APPEARS AREA SHOULD 168600 2002-0739 FCC MNM 19235108TH AVE SE C COMMERCIAL RID FACILITY NOT FUCTIONING DUE TO SEDIMENT IMPACT IN CHANNEL. P 68600 2003-0145 WQC WOO & SE 19ND ST 108TH AVE SE C ALLEGED DUMPING INTO STORM. INVESTIGATION DETERMINED NO EVIDENCE OF DUMP I 68600 2003-0230 C DCA 11455 SE 196TH ST C APPARENT DIRT BERM CONSTRUCTION. MAY CAUSE WATER TO FLOW ACROSS COUNT'! 686000 2003-0230 R DCA 11455 SE 196TH ST C APPARENT DIRT BERM CONSTRUCTION. MAY CAUSE WATER TO FLOW ACROSS COUNT'! 686000 2003-0295 FCC DDM 19800 108TH AVE SE C COMPLAINT CONCERNS ACTIVE PERMIT ACTIVITY. DOES LUSD INSPECTION AGENCY B9! 686000 2003-0538 FCR MNW 19123 113TH WAY SE C 68600 2003-0847 C DDM 19230 116TH AVE SE C APPARENT OBSTRUCTION OF OFFSITE CONTRIBUTING AREA AS A RESULT OF LANDSCAJ 68600 2003-0847 NDA-CDDM 19230 116THAVE SE C APPARENT OBSTRUCTION OF OFFSITE CONTRIBUTING AREA AS A RESULT OF LANDSCAI 58600 2003-0847 R DDM 19230 116TH AVE SE C APPARENT OBSTRUCTION OF OFFSITE CONTRIBUTING AREA AS A RESULT OF LANDSCAI68500 2003-0860 C DTA 18527 110TH PL SE C APPARENT OBSTRUCTION OF 4-INCH LOT DRAINAGE SYSTEM. NEED TO FLUSH AND OR 158500 2004-0297 FCR MMA 20127105TH AVE SE C REFD TO DOES. L99P3019-MURPHEYS LANDING STILL ACTIVE. 585000 2004-0413 C DDM SE 10848 192ND ST 0 e-mail to ODES 58600 Any legal restrictions on parking on access to drainage system? Investgiation shows area Is utility 2004-0493 FCC DTA 18630 108TH AVE SE C easement. Parking issue has no impact on stormwater system. 68600 Bioswale filled in? Investigation shows no bioswale or ditch along property line. Development plans 2004-D536 FCR MNM 19406116TH AVE SE C also do not show a bioswale/ditch. 686000 2004-0718 C DTA 18627110TH PL SE C Groundwater seeping out on private property across sidewalk to road. 68600 • Rental property draining onto neighbor. Neighbor had previously complained about same issues 2004-0806 C DTA 19835 105TH AVE SE C (2004-0682). Provided TA. 686000 2005-0107 C RFN 19701121ST AVE SE C Concern about impact from new development. No site visit done at this time. Engineer Review. 686000 Concern about impact from new development. No site visit done at this time. Engineer Review. 2005-0107 NDA-CRFN 19701121ST AVE SE 0 ROADS IS PROPOSING TO ADDRESS PROBLEMS IN ROW. 686000 Concern about impact from new development. No site visit done at this time. Engineer Review. 2005-0107 R RFN 19701 121ST AVE SE C ROADS IS PROPOSING TO ADDRESS PROBLEMS IN ROW. 686000 2005-0172 FCR TRE 18927111TH PLSE C Dead tree on 092060 (Benson Woods). Will Include in WA for removal. 68600 New ditch causing flooding in area. Investigation found clearing in sensitive area. DOES currently 2005-0180 C RFN 19421116THAVESE C has open case (E05GOO11). 686000 Water seeping onto ROW. Investigation found KC Roads had previously worked on problem. See 2005-0221 C DTA 18627110TH PL SE C also 2003-0860 & 2004-0718. 68600 Water flows across sidewalk from water meter. Water Dlst says not a leak. Appears to be 2005-0428 C RFN 19128113TH WY SE C groundwater collecting/spilling out of water meter box. Inv provided tech info. 68600 2005-0573 C DCA 200FT FRM SE 192ND ST & 108TH C Trenching/sandbagging in creek? Inv found KC rehab project in creek that was recently complete48600 Referral from KC Health. Rats in 091898. Inv found evidence of rats, but no impact to function & 2005-0682 FCR MNM 19133113THWYSE C maintenance of facility. No WLRD program to address rats in this situation. 68600 Water in basement. Inv did not find any KC storm system contributing to problem. Downspouts may 39052 C RFN 19625116THAVESE C be cause & complainant has vendor doing work. 686000 Ecology blocks placed In ditch causing water to backup/pond. Inv found blocks in baCkyards 2006-0055 C RFN 18919111TH PL SE C between properties. Minimal drainage impact. No KC facilities involved. 68600 prop. Appears to be unrelated to current stann system under const. Provided contact for school dist 2006-0299 C RFN 18621116THAVESE C ops. 68600 LETTER REGARDING THE SAFETY OF THE PANTHER CREEK CHANNEL JUST NORTH OF 2006-0359 X INa SE 10810 196TH ST C SE 196TH ST. 686000 2006-0436 C DTA SE 10707 201ST ST C Questions re: 091421 & oROS07. 686000 School const causing water seepage into yard. Inv found possible pipe defect in new Benson HlII 2006-0450 C DTA 18621116THAVESE C school proj. Still under DOES perf bond. DOES will add to punch list. 68600 MAR. 21.2007 1:29PM KING W WLKU Harrison NDAP Study May 15, 2002 King County Department of Narural Resources and Parks Water and Land Resources Division Stomlwater Services Section Prepared by: , 'y) '\j t' "J(' '-\ ,. -...... l-\\ .......... .l.._ •. ", Kelly R. ilhiting >, ~ King County Storrnwater Services Regulations and Compliance Unit Reviewed by: ~~1-~j Steve ~'olcy ~3. King County Stormw81cr Services Regul~!ions and Compliance Unit Killg ("OlinlY ONRP Ifur'l';,on NO"? Slud~ I'V. J" J I. j Muy IS, 2002 MAR. 21.200J 1:29PM KING W WLKV Hurlson Study April, 2002 Figure I: Location 10856 SE 192 nO Street, Renton i"'I"QW," ". ;; KinS ('Ounly DNRP ~Iarri .. n NDA? SlUIly Se 1001f\ PI 2 a &' I~V. J", r. u May IS. 2002 MAR. 21. 2007 I: 29PM KING CO. WLKU l'1V, )'1'") r. f Complaint History -Background Copies of pas I complaints and the Neighborhood Drainage Assistance Program rcview are included in Ihe Appendices. A brief overview is provided below. 91-0320 -Complaint about inadequate capacity ofSE 192'· street cross-culvert causing ponding water on Harrison properly. Conclusion was thaI Harrison property is a closed depression and Ihat driveway culvert may be the problem. Report indicates no evidcnce (hal the IS" cross culvert is inadequate. 92-0099 -Complaint about upstream development (Chinquapin Ridge, shortplat, etc.) increasing flows (0 private backyard drainage system. Inquiry was to delermine if upstream development complied with drainage requirements. Conclusion was that Harrison property is at topographic low-point. Stormwaler ponds in Chinquapin Ridge appeared 10 be functioning properly. Engineering Review repolt,dated 11/23/92, recommends that the Harrison private drainage system be upgraded. 96-0137 -Spring has becn formed in backyard. Flooding of back yard and under the house. Investigation repon dated 3/5/96, indicates that Mr. Harrison was informed that Engineering Study would be rcopened. August, 1996 -Meetings with Drainage Services' slafT at Harrison property. Appears that the Ford development to the eaSI (Towllhomes) will intercept much oCthe flow previously tributary to the undersi~ed private drainage system on the Han'ison property. Request made of ODES that Ford project be required to demonstrate no aggravation of flooding problem On the Harrison propel1y. 9S-0 123 -Repeat complaint about upstream flows causing drainage problem. Inditation is that Study tomplaint (96-0137) will remain open. County staff contacts to date-Steve Foley; Brute JOMson, Lally Gettle, Sue Clarke, Delite Koler, Doug Dobkins, Pat Simmons, George Schwendeman, Kelly Whiling Called Mr. Harrison on 4/9 for permissiQ~ inve~!C rivate drainage system for this study. Left messages e,t2s3 854-8190 da~u6~26 3234. No response. . ~. . Visited the site on 4/16. Received permission to inspect the site "t,m Broce Harrison's daughter. She indicated that the flooding problem still exists. Weather condition at time of visit was raining lightly after several days oflight to moderate rainfall. Harrison 'property is in a natural topographic draw. The SE 192 0d Street roadway effectively creates a dosed depression encompassing most of the Harrison property. The finished floor of the Harrison residence is below the roadway elevation which predisposes the property to drainage problems. KinG CounlY DNRP .H:1rI"i.~O'1 NOI\P 51Ud)' 3 . May 15.2002 MAR. 21. 2007 I: 29PM KING co. WLKO ,~v. J., '1') r, U Problem Description: Flooding of the backyard area occurs frequently. The Harrison residence is on a private septic system. S~ptic odors were present in the downstream catchbasills and may be related to the drainage problem. This type of yard flooding oCCurs annually. Flooding of the Harrison residence is documented as being limited to the cruwl space area. However, the lowest finished floor is at ground elevation and would also be sUbject to flooding, but likely less frequentlY than the backyard/septic flooding. The current level of protection against house flooding is estimated to he around the 25·year retUrn period, based on the complaint record. Note: the current Neighborhood Drainage Assistance Program priority scoring (240) does not include points for finisbed floor flooding. The public' and private drainage systems were found to be consistent with 3/5/96 complaint investigation report (FN 96-0137). A possible except,ion is the 12 inch concrete pipe draining flows from the west from the SE 192,d Street nonh roadside ditch may have been extended across the Harrison frontage. This westerly system appeal1; to infiltrate most oflhe roadway runoft' and was generating no flow at time offield visit, although the rest of the system was flowing partially full. If enclosed. the alteration is likely to have no effect on the backyard drainage problem. The county road project proposed along the Harrison frontage, originally scheduled for constrUction in 2000, has oot been completed. The Road project is not expectcd to resolve the backyard flooding problem. nor is it likely to provide increased protection against flooding oflhe crawl space and finished floor of the Harrison residence. The finished floor is approximately 5 feet below the minimum roadway elevation. The Harrison property is effectively a closed depression drained primarily by a 6 inch backyard flex pipe, and eventually the overtopping of the road. The adjacent property to the east appears to have been developed since the 3/5/96 site sketch was done. It was known as the Ford Property and is now a condominium complex. The condo drainage is mostly contained in the consttucted drainage system for the complex and appears to have redirected an additional 12+ acres of oft'site basin around the Harrison property. There is a stormwater pond adjacent to SE 192,d (and Harrison's property) which discharges to the road drainage system along the Harrison frontage. This system conveys flows southerly under SE 192 nd Street and into private property. The outlet of this system was 1I0t observed. However this system is documented in the downstream analysis prepared for the condo property (known as the Ford Project). The downstream system eventually discharges into the outlet stream of Panther Lake. From review of construction drawings, the condo pond oullet appears to be a 12 inch pipe to the bioswale. A second 12 inch outlet is provided with a shear gate. The pond overflow weir is to the bioswale. The bioswale discharg~s via 12 inch pipe. If the bioswale were to overtop, it would be to the Harrison driveway adjacent to the home. King ('o"nIY ON RP Ilurri.on NDAP Sludy 4 Muy t S, 20(12 MAR. 21. 2007 1: 29PM KING CO. WlKU IW, J.,,') !,' The pOnd was designed to the IOO·year stonn level so overtopping of the system should be infrequent. The public drainage system along Harrison's frontage is comprised ofa 48 inch Type II catchbasin and associated piping (see Figure 2). Flows exit this CB via an IS·inch CP pipe under SE I 92"d Street. Flows entering from the east (including the adjacent strormwater ponds) are delivered via an 18·inch CPEP pipe. flows from the north (including Harrison's private drainage system) enter the CB via an IS·inch CMP pipe. The IS·inch eMP is connected to a private Type I CB located in the Harrison driveway. This Typc I CB receives flows from the west via a 12·inch CP pipe. and from the north via the 6-inch ADS flexpipe. The 6·inch ADS pipe extends to approximately the north property line of the Harrison property, where a section of 12·inch CP is set vertically and serves as the inlet to the 6·inch ADS conveyance pipe (see photos in Appendix). The source of flows to the Harrison property is primarily from the north (See Figure 3). Although the entire north end of the property was saturated, there was no observed significant flows coming from the condo property to the east. The large vacant lot to the north of Harrison contains what appears to be an unclassified seasonal stream. This stream was traced to SE 190,h Street where it was observed flowing through an 8 inch concrete cross culvert. Upstream ofSE 190,h, the stream was observed traversing an open meadow on private property. Moving downstream from SE 190'h, the stream channel becomes undefined within the large vacant lot north o~ Harrison. The flows appear to spread out across the vacant lot prior to entering Ihe Harrison property. The soils were saturated with sevcral areas of ponding water. There was no' defined ch8TUlel, or visibly moving water at the Harrison property line. The private 6-inch yard drain is connected to a 12-inch round concrete open·topped drain structure (see photos in Appendix). The drain appears to be a few inches above the low point of the Harrison property and was controlling the elevation of the localized ponding at the time oflhe site visit. However, it is likely during larger storm events that the 6-inch pipe becomes the limiting component for a larger and deeper ponding area. This area has been designated high-density urban under the Growth Manag'ement Plan. It is expected that the upstream basin will eventually be developed to this density. The Harrison drainage system appears to be inadequate for current flow levels. This system will continue to be a limiting drainage design factor for upstream development until the system is properly retrofitted. Photos: \\wlmt7\'~hare\DRAINAOE\-KWHI\harrison photos.doc King CounlY DNRP Iialyi~on NCAP Siudy 5 May 15,1002 MAR. 21. 2007 1: 30PM KING CO. I'ILRO Alternative Evaluation: Hydrology - Drainage Area tributary to 190'" Stree.t cross-culvert (see Figure 3): 9.6 acres 9 dwelling units at 3,000 square feet each; 0.6 acres impervious I acre of second growth forest 8 acres of pasture/grass soils: Alderwood -C, Till SBUH: Time of concentration = -20 minutes I 00-year/24-hour ppl: 3.9 inches . 25-year/24-hour ppi: 3.4 inches Peak flows: SBUH laO-year: 4. 9 cf.~ 25-year: 3. 9 cf.~ KeRTS IS-minute tinlesleps -regional f10wpaths 100-year4.8 cfs . 25-year 2.8 cfs Backwater analysis of existing and proposed upgrades Existing System (see Figure 2): l~V. J", r. IV The KCBW program indicates approximately 0.5 cfs capacity for the existing 6" corrugated flex-pipe. Runoff'in excess of pipe capacity likely is entering the downstream drainage system at the private type I CB in the H an'ison driveway, or into the 12 inch stubout along the rockery. Both of these inlets are at or above the finished floor of the Harrison residence. Proposed conveyance upgrades (see Figure 4): Includes replacement of the 6" fJe.;pipe with a 12 inch smooth bore pipe. A connection to the existing Type I catch basin (Harrison driveway) would be made by matching the existing invert. A new Type I CB, with grale, would be installed adjacent to the nOltheast comer oftbe residence, with approximately 75 feet of 12 inch pipe (Pipe I). The pipe slope will be at 1.75% slope. The rim elevation would be set 1.0 feet below the concrete ~Iab e1evotion at the northeast comer of the residence. Some survey infOlmation was ~ollected and is available for final design. King (ounly DNRI' tlarrison NDAP Study May IS. 2002 MAR. 21. 2007 1: 30PM KING co. WLKO NV. J 1 )) r." An additional run of approximately 125 feet (slope = 2%) of 12 inch smooth bore pipe will extend the system [0 the current inlet location near the nonhem properly line (Pipe 2). A second Type I CB. with grate. will be installed here. The rim elevation will match existing topography with the pipe invert approximately 2 feet below grade. These upgrades were modeled using the KCBW program. The results indicate that Pipe I will have 7 efs capacity (8 cfs surcharged up to finiShed floor elevation). and Pipe 2 will have about 5.5 cfs capacity. These capacities are consistent with Current design standards of ncw systems. . Recommendation: 1. Replace the existing sill inch drain pipe with two runs of 12 inch concrele pipe. or smooth bore plastic pipe. 2. Match the invert of the existing 6 inch pipe at the private Type I C8 located in the Harrison driveway with 75 feet of new 12 inch pipe. 3. Locate a new Type I CB near the northeast comer of the Harrison residence. The rim elevation should be 'at least I foot below the concrete slab elevation. Use an open grated cover for the CB. Grade around the CB inlet as needed. 4. An additional run of approximately 125 feet (slope'" 2%) of 12 inch smooth bore pipe will extend the system to the current inlet near northern property line. S. A second new Type I CB, with grate. will be installed near the current inlet. The rim elevation will match existing topography with the pipe inve,1 approximately 2 fecl below grade. Use an open grated cover for the ca. 6. Add two runs of about 15 feet of perforated pipe out to the east and west from the inlet CB. These perforated pipes would be located in gravel filled trenches. They will serve to help collect shallow subsuface flows and unconcentrated surface flows into the new private drainage system. The cost of the proposed upgrades is estimated at $16.800. With an NDAP total impact score of 240, the project has a NDAP priority score of 1.42. The recommended project will be transmitted to SWS Engineering Support and Response Services for funding consideration. King COlln'Y DNRP Hurri,on NDAP SlUdy 7 May 15, 2002 MAR. 21. 2007 1: 30PM KING CO. WLRD Figure 2: Existing Harrison Drainage System 12" round concrete inlct 6" ADS Typt 1 CB 11" round gnul! )2" CP 12" CP from rockery '" 'ROW _. -'-'-'-'---'-'---' _.-. _.-.-._._.-._._ .. -~ .. _._. -'-'-'-'-'-'-' _.-_._._._._._. I \g" CMP I 4K" TypeU CB I~"CP Killg ('ollmy DNRP lIarrison NDAP Study 1M" CPEP 72" Type II CB K nu. Jln r. Ii 12' (PEP from bio- swale <I IS" CPEP Muy I~. 2()02 12' CPEP from RID MAR. 2!. 2007 I: 30PM KING CO. i'lL RD NU. jll' r. I? 1l.996~013i SE 192" (looking west) along Harrison Frontage Harrison Driveway at location of drainage system Public Drainage System along Harri,on Frontage Existing Private Drail)8ge System Inlel. Harrison backyard. MAR. 2 \.2007 1: 31 PM KING CO. WLRO NV. J~n r. I U 1996-0137 Existing Private DIlIin.g. S)'Stem Inlel. HUlTi,on backy ... d. PholO HalTison backy.rd. Existing Priv.te Drainage Syslem Inlet. Palh of proposed new conveyance s)'Stem. Photo MAR. 21. 2007 1: 31 PM KING CO. WLKU "v. J") I. " ~"DAP PRIOIUTY SCORING SHEET Is Project Lo<:.ated Project Name: in a Tugeted Basin? Yes ~ No 0 Projec(Number: .* ...... ~ .................... "'tI( ...... ,.,"' ....... I!f .... oit ... .., ..... Th'r:fJACT C:r~T.:ER!A ...... ~ .... _Wl ............ * ............... o;t."'." .. "" .. ... POINTS· ADD 0, 2, # PROPERiILS flIT. RlSK Th.fPAC..I OR ~ FOR SEvERITY IMPACTED (+0, 2 O'R 4) TOTALS .Living structure, .L ~. finished floor (20 ... X '" ~ Access (4 , ) X -r -;-= Septic/Well (8 7-If' ) x -L ~ , , '" Ol.l'er st£""\JClU re or -L , ~wlsp2.c.e (4 .;-/../ ) x -I = LandsupL"g/yw:ll L{ -1-~ ,. p~b.ng (1 ) X = Other prop!rry/ d4c:.lIiag~ sys~m (0.5. , ) x .;-= N'atu.d resources 3 ,. -;-= S,(J,BT.OT A.L = -"t ~M"'W>:,"'_"~_""'''''''~'''.~''''''''''''''''''''Io.:lo!I E\:"EN-r rREQu"':E:.!"'\CY FA.CTOR Iit.Jo!. ................... ~w· ... "'I~ ......... ":' ... "' .... "' ... .' ~0:-ci.~jt (1 -:-timeslye.ar) . . . . . . . 20 2·5. years; ind"finile but on:n; channel erosioil . _ . . . . . . . . . 10 E.F.F. = ~·lO y~s .. : : . '. c' ••.. '. _ . : .•.. ' .. ~ SUBTOTAL X ·E.?F.'-= 10·25 yeus .................... 2 >25yan ............. 1 TOTAL Th1l'ACT SCORE ?L/(;/ =. -.. ~ Dat.!: Rl'. led by.J;;:t..-v' .w .. ,.,· ............................. ·..r'oc· ........ • ...... .., .... ·COST-BENt..FTI' MTIO ....... ", ............... _ ...................................... ", ... w¥w COST OF SOLUTION TOTAL IMPACT SCORE X lO:) I COST ,-"11(.' ''''4~ = s 141>0'0 l'-"OAP PRIORlTY SCORE :0 //-(Z, MAR. 21. 2007 1 :31PM KING CO. WL KU NV. JjD r. 10 NDAP PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE NAME; Harrison NDAP Study COMPLAINT #: 96-0t 37 DATE: 5/6/02 PREPARED BY:.;:k:..;:rw:.-__ THE COSTS BELOW INCLUDE ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PERFORMING THE TASK (I.E. MOBILIZATION, TESC, ETC.). THESE NUMBERS BASED ON 2001 DSS PERFOMANCE STANDARDS AND INPUT FROM ROADS DIVISION. M37 Repair Existing Pipe S03 Install Pipe (18 Inch Diameter or Less) S04 Install Pipe (> I 8 Inches Diameter) S02 Install Type I Catch Basin Install 48" Manhole, 7 Ft Deep 509 Trash Reck (installed) M29 Hand Brushing MaO Mechanical Brushing M3t Tree Removal M32 Bulk Excavation M24 Clean Pipe M22 Clean Catch Basin M21 Clean Manhole w/Control Structure M26 Clean e.is1ing Ditch/Swale SO~ Construct Ditch/Swale S07 Construct Access Road M34 Restore Existing Access Road M39 Rook Haul and Mechanically Place Asphalt Patch (Up to 180 SQ FT) T03 Hydltlseeding S10 Haul, Place, Compact Fill S08 Install Gabion Install French Drain Install Concrete Curb, Gutter, and~' Sidewalk Install Chain Link Fence Install Asphalt Berm Other (specily) 200 2 30 LF LF LF EA EA EA SY SY EA CY LF EA EA LF LF LF LF CY EA SY CY EA LF LF LF LF $ 102.00 $ 59.50 $ 83.00 $1,927.00 S 3,800_00 $ 950.00 $ 0.51 $ 0_36 $ 1,250.00 $ 21.00 $ 6_00 $ 158.00 $ 283.00 $ .19.00 $ 15.50 $ 26.00 $ 2.50 $ 16.50 $ 390.00 $ O.BO $ 35_00 $ 295.00 $ 35.00 S 300.00 $ 26.00 $ 6_50 THE COSTS BELOW DO NOT INCLUDE ALL COSTS FOR PERFORMING TASKS M39 S03 S04 TOS OR SUPPLYING MATERIAL. FOR SMALL JOBS, ENTER THE AMOUNT OF MATERIAL NEEDED AND ESTIMATE THE PORTION OF A CREW DAY REQUIRED TO DO THE WORK. Rock (Material Only) CY 256 $ 10.00 Small Pipe (IBlnch Diameter or Les.) LF 60 $ 26.00 Large Pipe (>1a Inch Diameter) LF 60 $ 27.00 Topsoil CY ISO $ 11.50 Asphalt (1 Ton Cov.", ee sa FT wl2 Inches) TN 13 $ 33.00 Mise Tasks (5 Person Crew, w/Equipment) DAY $1,600.00 TOTAL COST: LF LF LF EA EA EA SY SY EA CY LF EA EA LF LF LF LF CY EA SY CY EA LF LF LF LF CY LF LF CY TN DAY $16,804 SO S1 I ,900 SO $3,854 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 SO SO $0 $1,050 SO $0 $0 SO $0 SO $0 $0 SO $0 The Riley Group Inc. WETLAND DELINEA nON REPORT TRUVEST SHORT PLAT 11044 SE 19rd Street RENTON, WA April 20, 2007 PREPARED BY: The Riley Group, ][nc. 17522 Bothell Way NE Bothell, W A 98011 PREPARED FOR: Truvest, LLC clo Gary Watts P.O. Box 1754 Renton, W A 98057 RGI PROJECT No. Serving the Pacific Northwest MAIN OFFICE: 17522 BOTHELL WAY NE, BOTHELL, WA 98011 TEL (425) 415-05510 FAX (425) 415-0311 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF REPORT ........................................................................................ 2 1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 BACKGROUND RESEARCH .......................................................................................................................... 4 2. WETLAND DELINEATION ........................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 VEGET A nON .............................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1.1 Table I. Plant Indicator Codes ............................................................................................................. 4 2.2 SOILS .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 HyDROWGy ............................................................................................................................................... 5 2.4 WETLAND RATINGS .................................................................................................................................... 5 3. INVENTORY INFORMATION ...................................................................................................................... 5 4. WETLAND STUDY RESULTS ....................................................................................................................... 5 4.1 VEGETATION .............................................................................................................................................. 5 4.2 SOILS .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 4.3 HYDROLOGy ............................................................................................................................................... 7 5. WETLAND DETERMINA TION .................................................................................................................... 7 6. WETLAND RATING ....................................................................................................................................... 7 7. REPORT LIMIT A TIONS ................................................................................................................................ 7 A P PEN D I X A: WET LAN D D E T E R MIN A T ION D A T A FOR M S ....... ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. A P PEN D I X B: WET LAN D RAT I N G FOR M .... ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. A P PEN D I XC: SIT E P LAN .............................................. ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. 1. Introduction and Purpose of Report This report presents the findings of a wetland determination performed by The Riley Group on a 84,506 square' foot (1.95 acres) parcel located at 11 044 SE 192 nd Street, Renton, W A, (Unincorporated King County), Parcel 6623400132 (Figure 1). The study was performed in support of an application to short plat the property. In response to communication from King County DDES, the scope of work for this report was to perform a wetland determination on the parcel to the north, Parcel 2698200220; permission was granted by the adjacent property owner to enter the site. No on-site wetland analysis was performed pursuant to this project. The study area of the delineation was the wetland edge adjacent to the subject parcel; a delineation of the entire off-site wetland boundary was not performed. Accordingly, the southern edge of a Category III wetland was delineated on the parcel to the north; the buffer of this wetland extends onto the subject site. I : \". .. I.···, ._ .1 + r' . . .... :lciDs~~"" lFigure 1: Vicinity and Critical Areas Map 1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION The site is nearly level and primarily grassland. A home is located at the south end ofthe site and several out-buildings and scattered vehicles are present. The adjacent site, i.e. the study area, is forested along its southern property boundary. Figure 2: Aerial Photograph 1.2 BACKGROUND RESEARCH No streams or wetlands were mapped on the King County GIS Critical Areas Maps, as shown on Figure I. 2. Wetland! Delineation 2.1 VEGETATION Vegetation was evaluated across the adjacent site to the north to determine the presence of hydrophytic plant communities. Plant communities are considered hydrophytic when more than 50 percent of the dominant species in the plant community have a wetland indicator status of facultative (FAC+, FAC, & FAC-), facultative wetland (FACW+, FACW, & FACW-), or obligate wetland (OBL), as listed in the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands, Region 9 -Northwest (Reed, 1993 and 1988). The indicator codes for plant species are noted in Table 1. 2.1.1 TABLE 1. PLANT INDICATOR CODES Indicat()r Code . ,,' , FrequericyofOcc1.lrrencein Wetlands Obligate Wetland (OBL) -occur almost always in wetlands >99% Facultative Wetland (FACW*) -usually occur in wetlands 67·99% Facultative (F AC *) -equally likely to occur in wetlands or 34·66% non·wetlands Facultative Upland (FACU*) -usually occur in non·wetlands 1·34% Obligate Upland (UPL) -occur almost always in non·wetlands <1% Not Listed (NL) -no indicator status ... * Note: F ACW, F AC, and FACU also have + and -values to represent species near the wetter end of the spectrum (+) and species near the drier end of the spectrum (.). Dominant species were recorded as species comprising more than 20 percent of the plant community in each stratum (tree, shrub, and/or herb layer). 2.2 SOILS Anaerobic (saturated) conditions cause soils to form certain characteristics that can be observed in the field. Hydric indicators include: the presence of a matrix chroma of 1 or less in unmottled soil or 2 or less in mottled soil, gleyed soil, organic soils (peats and mucks), and the accumulation of sulfidic material. Soil pits were dug in each data point, using a shovel to depths of 16 to 18 inches below ground surface (BGS). Soils textures were characterized using Natural Resources Conservation Service protocol, and examined for hydric indicators as described by the Washington State Manual. Soil colors were identified using a Munsell soil color chart (Kollmorgen Corporation, 1988). Depth of soil saturation was recorded for each data point. Wetland Data Sheets are included in Appendix A. Several secondary data points were examined across the wetland/upland boundary in order to determine the approximate boundary line, although data forms were not completed at the secondary data points. The secondary data points were used to examine similarities or differences in soils between major data points and to establish mapped soil unit boundaries. 2.3 HYDROLOGY At each data point, observations of direct and indirect wetland hydrology indicators were evaluated and recorded. Under normal conditions, hydrologic indicators are used to determine if the hydrology is either currently present or can be inferred from the guidelines provided in the Washington State Manual. These indicators include: recorded data, visual observation of inundation or saturation, watermarks, drift lines, sediment deposits, drainage patterns, local soil survey data, oxidized root channels, and water-stained leaves. 2.4 WETLAND RATINGS Wetlands, where present, were classified according to King County Code (KCC) 21A.24.318 Wetlands -categories, as follows: A. Wetlands are classified into category L category IL category III and category IV based on the adopted Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington, Washington state department of ecology publication number 04-06-025, published August 2004. 3. Inventory Information The King County GIS Sensitive Areas maps do not indicate any wetlands or streams on or within 100-feet of the subject site (Figure 1). 4. Wetland Study Results 4.1 VEGETATION The study area, located on the adjacent parcel to the north, is dominated by red alder (Alnus rubra) and black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera) in the overstory; some western red cedar (Thuja plicata) is also present. Within wet areas represented by DP1, Scouler's willow (Salix scouleriana), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis) and Douglas spirea (Spiraea douglasii) codominate in the shrub layer; Himalayan blackberry (Rubus procerus) is common. Slough sedge (Carex obnupta) is also present. This is a hydrophytic plant community. In the forested upland, the shrub layer is dominated by Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis); Himalayan blackberry dominates in the understory. Swordfern (Polystichum munitum) and Pacific blackberry (Rubus ursinus) co-dominate in the groundlayer. This is a non-hydrophytic plant community. 4.2 SOILS The site is mapped on the Web Soil Survey as AgC (Alderwood gravelly sandy loam 6 -15% slopes), as shown on Figure 3. The Alderwood series is a non-hydric soil made up of moderately well drained soils that have a weakly consolidated to strongly consolidated substratum at a depth of 24 to 40 inches. Typically, these soils are on uplands. They are formed under conifers, in glacial deposits. In a representative profile, the surface layer and subsoil are very dark brown, dark-brown, and grayish-brown gravelly sandy loam about 27 inches thick. The substratum is grayish-brown, weakly consolidated to strongly consolidated glacial till that extends to a depth of 60 inches and more. Some small depressional areas mapped as Alderwood soils are inclusions of the poorly drained Bellingham, Seattle, Tukwila, and Shalcar soils. Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil in Alderwood soils and very slow in the substratum. Water moves on top of the substratum in winter. Soil on the adjacent site at DP2 within the upland forest was 10YR 3/2 unmottled loam. This soil generally matched the mapped series and is considered non-hydric. At DP I, soil was black (IOYR 311) muck to 9 inches underlain by mottled I OYR 4/2 fine sandy loam to 14+ inches. This soil generally matches the Tukwila series. The Tukwila series is made up of very poorly drained organic soils that formed in decomposing sedges, rushes, grasses, and shrubs. These hydric soils are in wet basins of upland depressions and on stream bottoms. In a representative profile, dominantly black to very dark brown muck extends to a depth of 60 inches or more. There is a seasonal high water table at or near the surface. SOIL SURVEY OF KING COUNTY AREA, WASHINGTON Figure 3: Soil Map (Age: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 -15% slopes) 4.3 HYDROLOGY Wetland hydrology indicators, i.e. soil saturation to the surface, were observed as DP! near the wetland edge. No indicators were observed at DP2 in the forested upland. An ornamental pond has been constructed within the northern end of the wetland. A constructed ditch apparently serves as an overflow device; a detailed evaluation was not conducted of these features. 5. Wetland Determination Based upon the presence of all three wetland indicators, a wetland is present on the adjacent parcel to the north. The southern boundary of the wetland was delineated and surveyed and is shown on the site plan in Appendix C. 6. Wetland Rating The wetland rates Category III using Version 2 of the Wetland Rating Form for Western Washington, Appendix B. Although specifics about Category III wetlands within Urban Areas of King County are protected with a standard 75-foot buffer width. As shown on the Site Plan (Appendix C), no modifications to this buffer width are proposed. 7. Report Limitations Work for this project was performed, and this report prepared for, Gary Watts and his authorized representatives in accordance with generally accepted professional practices. This report is not meant to represent a legal opinion. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. If you have any question regarding this report or its findings, please call us at (425) 415-0551, or contact us by fax at (425) 415-0311. Sincerely, THE RILEY GROUP, INC. Celeste Botha Senior Wetland Ecologist Report Distribution: Paul D. Riley, LG, LHG President Gary Watts, Truvest, LLC (4 copies) ,-.--- " r'--"~ .-'n ,.,.~~ ~~~~~ , ' -', :,,~ i' ! :' i i L~,--- i j I·~·~l~' I i r--~,1D,j . ! ' : l~ J 1-1- ~" I~----~--- \ : ~ , . ~I , .i._ , i" i~T ::l , " i' -, i ~\ '" c: c: ::J L -_. .. -",,i / __ • I ! ... N '0) , ~~~, ,-6623400132 : -"'" ,,/'" / "~l --h 44 SE 192ND ,-" Unnarnpdi "_-V . tt" '" t£/~·· / I' a:1 1 >-I l.-/; __ .. _ , . Ie: '\ m / ! i,~ .~ ~ 4_., ,/// > , -, ~\ / .. / ~, _!i "--'12 J_._ ----i12--:-___ ~_o§i~--,2 ') § 1 1 -, -~ ~ -il' --',~" ; I ~ -~ . I . ~.l: : \ 'r~~~ I .i ./, '~ £1 ~--~ {!*!~ ~~"<J ~ ,J, r----~~~~, ~ ~ --1 ::J _ . 0 /CI '(;h r® .. '2' (D I'~:-' '-~ ~ -_:I'~'_'; ~Lcj." ~ __ j f~ I' ...l!.-~1L ~_ 12 -T ·------r~---"-' -'. i@ , , , t----: " \i --• /2. •• oil... ....~~.~ '----, ' ----::o~~ .. I·lc_A~~)~!~ ~'7 _ :.': -, ----'~.'. -, -i ; I I I I II L __ --... -r-I i ! 1 : ' :! , ,---T--- I , DRAINAGE DATA 11044 SE 192nd St I ( i I ,I J I r--L-~ ~L ) j Ii 11'-... , 1 • ~ ... ! _~J __ L __ ~I i\~ f il o o CATCH BASIN CULVERT OUTFALL PIPE SIZE (INCHES) ---·10 -12 N ,~-~~ ! .r-" -L----1 I __ L_ I '. I i! NO DRAIN~GE MAPPE~t , OFF RIGHT OF WAY i: " i\ : '\. ~ .... ! ~~ ~ ....,,~i~~ -, -, -DITCH -18 CJ 11044 SE 19251 PARCEL -24 L~-.:J PARCEL BOUNDARY -30 -STREET NETWORK -36 'Dralnage has no! been mapped for the area behind the legend AaNan.! Kg\\T\.IcIew~ProtedIil\11044_SE192.mxd 00000_ SIandanl KIng CaunIy ctatasell used 1ncIuje: cty, InuIlLne1worl!, ~ + o 50 100 ,;'n "Feet May 24, 2007 l : ,_~' __ ~~ ~-+-i t ° J0 Ro.s. dataHIS Include: black rivet ~ data The InIom'IaIIon Inc:fucMd on !his map has been COff4lIIed by King Courty 111ft from_ v.rIaIyol.-.ces and IBIdIjed: to chaI'IO-wthoII: nalice. KIng Cou'Iy IIIIIoa no ~Ions Of W*lBIt_ axpr-e. or 1nVIad. 1M to accur.cy, con'4lllll_. I~, or righIs 10 \he _ of such WonntUon. ThiI doIunent Is noIlNended lor usa 118' survey produd_Klng CounIylhd naI be btM for ant geI*1II. apedaI, nlred.IncideI'MI, ti --, , , , 1-~~---, , i~ I ! a.l ! [> I ,« I '.c " i/O ! 'li~ --~---~~.\ I~~~ ~ . " I' ~~~=~:-'~-12 ;~ __ _ ... '''' -.---" !' ·,1'.,:----., ... 12·· ---- ~ ,..~--,- I" i , , ! ___ 1 " L,l.L.,_~+~~ . -~ -~"-1 \~. i 1"'-., ~ _' . t • 1 i , 1 or ~ dMnages 1ncU:Ing. but nm Iin1Ied 1o,Iost IWa'lUMI Of'" ptdb ~ from .. tae or nBIII8 oI! the irIorrrIIIlIon COIUIned on ltD """. My •• d .... !alp or Hom.oon on IhiIIJIIp III ~ad txOtfJI by MIIIn perrnIMIon of I(IrIg Couny. NPDES DISCLAIMER: King County --""""'" RoIId MIIrt..,-a Se:IiDn . TedmoiOvr Ual ~ The drainage data displayed on this map was collected in 1994, 1995. & 1996. Drainage may have been changed and or upgraded 10 accommodate present surrounding development. -" i / I , I ~ • ;' i ; i i ~ ~ ~~~~~~~ ____ :~~=::~~~:~~~;~~~~~~~cccc==:~=_--~-~:~~ I \'._ i " ( Basin: '\ ( OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL, CORE REQUIREMENT #2 Subbasin Name: (' " Subbasin Number: l'lm:: , Basin Cales Pyramid Engineering, LLC 29015 Military Rd S, PMB 544 Tel: (253)-852-1164 Federal Way, WA 98003 Fax: (253)-859-2065 Project Name: Eggebrecht Short Plat Project No.: Watts Description: Basin Calcs Date: 6/27/2007 I Calc. By: dwb Basin 1 (Refer also to attached existing and developed conditions maps) Eggebrecht Existing Conditions Area Area Impervious Impervious Landscaped Impervious Wetland Forest (Sq.Ft.) (Acres) ('!o) pgis (Ac) (Acres) Roof (Ac) (Acres) (Acres) Plat 68,947 1.583 0.189 1.394 Offsite ROW 5,914 0.136 0.136 74,861 1.719 0.189 1.530 Eggebrecht Short Plat Area Area Impervious Impervious Landscaped Impervious Wetland (Sq.Ft.) (Acres) ('!o) pgis (Ac) (Acres) Roof (Ac) (Acres) ROW 11,860 0.272 90% 0.245 0.027 Lots 38,137 0.876 75'!o 0.197 0.219 0.460 Storm Control 8,798 0.202 90% 0.020 0.182 Wetland 8,220 0.189 100% 0.189 ccess & Utility 1,932 0.044 90% 0.040 0.004 ,b-total 68,947 1.583 0.482 0.271 0.641 0.189 Offsite ROW 5,914 0.136 90% 0.122 0.014 Total 74,861 1.719 0.604 0.284 0.641 0.189 Basin 2 (Refer also to attached existing and developed conditions maps) ROW to 192nd Existing Conditions Portion of Lot 1 9,582 0.220 0.220 R.O.W. 7,336 0.168 0.168 16,918 0.388 0.388 ROW to 192nd Developed Conditions Portion of Lot 1 9,582 0.220 10% 0.022 0.198 R.OW. 7,336 0.168 90% 0.152 0.017 16,918 0.388 0.174 0.215 IIPyramids11clientslWatts PlatIStormDrainageIWatts-2007-06-22.xls 6/27/2007 2:02 PM I Number Area (sf) Area (ac) 1 18,015 0.414 2 4,068 0,093 3 4,274 0,098 4 3,599 0,083 5 3,073 0,071 6 3,420 0,079 7 3,220 0,074 8 4,025 0,092 9 4,025 0,092 Sub-Total 47,719 1,095 ac Tract A 8,798 0,202 Storm Control & Recreational Tract B 8,220 0,189 Wetland Tract C 14,024 0,322 Access and Utility Tract D 1,932 0,044 20' Access and Utility Sub-Total 32,974 0,757 ac I Offsite ROW 11,081 0,254 ac East 1/2 of ROW (offsite) Total 91,774 2,107 ac 'ater Quality Volume Calculations KCSWDM Page 6-72 I Vr -(0,9Ai + 0,25Atg + 0,1OAtt + 0,01Ao) x R I I Eggebrecht Vr -volume of runoff from mean annual storm Ai = area of impervious surface (sf) 1,434 ac Atg = area oftill soil covered with grass (sf) 0,284 ac Att = area of till soil covered with forest (sf) o ac Ao = area of outwash soil covered with grass or forest (sf) o ac R = rainfall from mean annual storm (ft) 0,0392 ft Eggebrecht Vr -2324 cf Vb=Nr Vb -wetpool volume (cf) f = volume factor (3) E~~ebrecht Vb -6971 cf IIPyramids1\clientslWatls PlatIStormDrainageIWatls-2007-06-22,xls 6/27/2007 2:02 PM Eggebrecht short plat 2007-06-26 Basin 1 -Existing conditions Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:wpre.tsf project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of peak (CFS) 0.119 2 2/09/01 15:00 0.028 7 1/05/02 16:00 0.093 3 2/28/03 3:00 0.003 8 3/24/04 19:00 0.044 6 1/05/05 8:00 0.075 4 1/18/06 21:00 0.063 5 2/01/07 1:00 0.157 1 1/09/08 9:00 computed peaks WPRE.PKS -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- - -peaks - -Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0.157 1 100.00 0.990 0.119 2 25.00 0.960 0.093 3 10.00 0.900 0.075 4 5.00 0.800 0.063 5 3.00 0.667 0.044 6 2.00 0.500 0.028 7 1. 30 0.231 0.003 8 1.10 0.091 0.144 50.00 0.980 page 1 Eggebrecht Short plat 2007-06-26 Basin 1 -Developed conditions Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:wdev.tsf project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual peak Flow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of peak (CFS) 0.353 5 2/09/01 2:00 0.282 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.418 3 2/27/03 7:00 0.316 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.376 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.349 6 1/18/06 16:00 0.459 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.661 1 1/09/08 6:00 computed peaks WDEV.PKS -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- - -peaks Rank Return prob (CFS) period 0.661 1 100.00 0.990 0.459 2 25.00 0.960 0.418 3 10.00 0.900 0.376 4 5.00 0.800 0.353 5 3.00 0.667 0.349 6 2.00 0.500 0.316 7 1. 30 0.231 0.282 8 1.10 0.091 0.594 50.00 0.980 page 1 Eggebrecht Short Plat Retention/Detention Facility Type of Facility: Detention Vault Facility Length: 73.50 ft Facility Width: 73.50 ft Facility Area: 5402. sq. ft Effective Storage Depth: 5.90 ft Stage 0 Elevation: 469.10 ft Storage Volume: 31873. cu. ft Riser Head: 5.90 ft Riser Diameter: 18.00 inches Number of orifices: 3 Full Head Pipe Orifice # Height Diameter Discharge Diameter (ft) (in) (CFS) (in) 1 0.00 0.66 0.029 2 2.80 1. 20 0.069 4.0 3 3.70 0.75 0.023 4.0 Top Notch Weir: None Outflow Rating Curve: None Stage Elevation Storage Discharge Percolation (ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs) (cfs) 0.00 469.10 o. 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.01 469.11 54. 0.001 0.001 0.00 0.02 469.12 108. 0.002 0.002 0.00 0.03 469.13 162. 0.004 0.002 0.00 0.04 469.14 216. 0.005 0.002 0.00 0.05 469.15 270. 0.006 0.003 0.00 0.06 469.16 324. 0.007 0.003 0.00 0.17 469.27 918. 0.021 0.005 0.00 0.29 469.39 1567. 0.036 0.006 0.00 0.40 469.50 2161. 0.050 0.007 0.00 0.52 469.62 2809. 0.064 0.009 0.00 0.63 469.73 3403. 0.078 0.009 0.00 0.75 469.85 4052. 0.093 0.010 0.00 0.86 469.96 4646. 0.107 0.011 0.00 0.98 470.08 5294. 0.122 0.012 0.00 1.10 470.20 5943. 0.136 0.012 0.00 1. 21 470.31 6537. 0.150 0.013 0.00 1. 33 470.43 7185. 0.165 0.014 0.00 1.44 470.54 7779. 0.179 0.014 0.00 1. 56 470.66 8428. 0.193 0.015 0.00 1. 67 470.77 9022. 0.207 0.015 0.00 1. 79 470.89 9670. 0.222 0.016 0.00 1.91 471. 01 10318. 0.237 0.016 0.00 2.02 471.12 10913 . 0.251 0.017 0.00 2.14 471.24 11561. 0.265 0.017 0.00 2.25 471.35 12155. 0.279 0.018 0.00 2.37 471.47 12803. 0.294 0.018 0.00 2.48 471. 58 13398. 0.308 0.019 0.00 2.60 471. 70 14046. 0.322 0.019 0.00 2.72 471. 82 14 694. 0.337 0.019 0.00 2.80 471. 90 15126. 0.347 0.020 0.00 \\Pyramids! \clients\Watts Plat\StormDrainage\WLEVEL3-2007-06-25.doc Last printed 6/25/2007 !2:49:00PM 2.81 471.91 15180. 0.348 0.020 0.00 2.83 471.93 15288. 0.351 0.021 0.00 2.84 471.94 15342. 0.352 0.023 0.00 2.85 471.95 15396. 0.353 0.025 0.00 2.86 471.96 15450. 0.355 0.027 0.00 2.88 471.98 15558. 0.357 0.031 0.00 2.89 471.99 15613 . 0.358 0.032 0.00 2.90 472.00 15667. 0.360 0.032 0.00 3.02 472.12 16315. 0.375 0.039 0.00 3.13 472.23 16909. 0.388 0.043 0.00 3.25 472.35 17557. 0.403 0.047 0.00 3.36 472.46 18152. 0.417 0.051 0.00 3.48 472.58 18800. 0.432 0.054 0.00 3.59 472.69 19394. 0.445 0.057 0.00 3.70 472.80 19988. 0.459 0.060 0.00 3.71 472.81 20042. 0.460 0.060 0.00 3.72 472.82 20096. 0.461 0.061 0.00 3.73 472.83 20150. 0.463 0.062 0.00 3.74 472.84 20204. 0.464 0.064 0.00 3.75 472.85 20258. 0.465 0.065 0.00 3.76 472.86 20312. 0.466 0.065 0.00 3.88 472.98 20961. 0.481 0.070 0.00 3.99 473.09 21555. 0.495 0.075 0.00 4.11 473.21 22203. 0.510 0.078 0.00 4.23 47 3.33 22852. 0.525 0.082 0.00 4.34 473.44 23446. 0.538 0.085 0.00 4.46 473.56 24094. 0.553 0.088 0.00 4.57 473.67 24688. 0.567 0.092 0.00 4.69 473.79 25337. 0.582 0.094 0.00 4.80 473.90 25931. 0.595 0.097 0.00 4.92 474.02 26579. 0.610 0.100 0.00 5.04 474.14 27227. 0.625 0.103 0.00 5.15 474.25 27822. 0.639 0.105 0.00 5.27 474.37 28470. 0.654 0.108 0.00 5.38 474.48 29064. 0.667 0.110 0.00 5.50 47 4.60 29712. 0.682 0.112 0.00 5.61 474.71 30307. 0.696 0.115 0.00 5.73 474.83 30955. 0.711 0.117 0.00 5.84 474.94 31549. 0.724 0.119 0.00 5.90 475.00 31873. 0.732 0.120 0.00 6.00 475.10 32414. 0.744 0.584 0.00 6.10 475.20 32954. 0.757 1.430 0.00 6.20 475.30 33494. 0.769 2.530 0.00 6.30 475.40 34034. 0.781 3.820 0.00 6.40 47 5.50 34574. 0.794 5.290 0.00 6.50 47 5.60 35115. 0.806 6.720 0.00 6.60 475.70 35655. 0.819 7.250 0.00 6.70 475.80 36195. 0.831 7.750 0.00 6.80 47 5.90 36735. 0.843 8.210 0.00 6.90 476.00 37276. 0.856 8.650 0.00 7.00 476.10 37816. 0.868 9.060 0.00 7.10 476.20 38356. 0.881 9.460 0.00 7.20 476.30 38896 . 0.893 9.840 0.00 7.30 476.40 39436. 0.905 10.210 0.00 7.40 476.50 39977. 0.918 10.570 0.00 7.50 476.60 40517. 0.930 10.910 0.00 7.60 476.70 41057. 0.943 11.240 0.00 \\Pyramids 1 \clients\ Watts Plat\StonnDrainage\ WLEVEL3-2007-06-25.doc Last printed 6/25/2007 12:49:00 PM 7.70 476.80 41597. 0.955 7.80 476.90 42138. 0.967 7.90 477.00 42678 . 0.980 Hyd Inflow Outflow Peak Target Calc Stage Elev 1 0.35 0.20 0.09 4.52 473.62 2 0.66 ******* 0.09 4.7l 473.81 3 0.42 ******* 0.08 4.09 473.19 4 0.33 ******* 0.07 3.79 472.89 5 0.35 ******* 0.04 3.03 472.13 6 0.28 ******* 0.02 2.75 471.85 7 0.21 ******* 0.02 2.68 471. 78 8 0.32 ******* 0.02 1. 88 470.98 Route Time Series through Facility Inflow Time Series File:wdev.tsf Outflow Time Series File:wleve13 Inflow lOut flow Analysis Peak Inflow Discharge: 0.661 CFS at Peak Outflow Discharge: 0.097 CFS at Peak Reservoir Stage: 4.80 Ft Peak Reservoir Elev: 473.90 Ft Peak Reservoir Storage: 25944. Cu-Ft 0.596 Ac-Ft Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:wleve13.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac 11.570 0.00 11.880 0.00 12.190 0.00 Storage (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft) 24421. 0.561 25459. 0.584 22119. 0.508 20495. 0.471 16379. 0.376 14851. 0.341 14503. 0.333 10172 . 0.234 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 20:00 on Feb 9 in Year 1 ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak --Peaks --Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) (ft) Period 0.097 1 2/09/01 20:00 0.097 4.80 1 100.00 0.990 0.021 6 1/07/02 4:00 0.095 4.71 2 25.00 0.960 0.078 3 3/06/03 22:00 0.078 4.12 3 10.00 0.900 0.016 8 8/26/04 8:00 0.067 3.81 4 5.00 0.800 0.020 7 1/08/05 5:00 0.041 3.07 5 3.00 0.667 0.041 5 1/19/06 0:00 0.021 2.83 6 2.00 0.500 0.067 4 11/24/06 8:00 0.020 2.79 7 1. 30 0.231 0.095 2 1/09/08 14:00 0.016 1. 89 8 1.10 0.09l Computed Peaks 0.096 4.77 50.00 0.980 Flow Duration from Time Series File:wleve13.tsf Cutoff Count Frequency CDF Exceedence_Probability CFS % % % 0.002 25697 41. 906 41. 906 58.094 0.581E+00 0.004 7754 12.645 54.552 45.448 0.454E+00 0.007 8917 14.542 69.093 30.907 0.309E+00 0.010 6346 10.349 79.442 20.558 0.206E+00 0.012 5143 8.387 87.829 12.171 0.122E+00 0.015 3378 5.509 93.338 6.662 0.666E-01 0.018 207l 3.377 96.716 3.284 0.328E-01 0.020 1557 2.539 99.255 0.745 0.745E-02 0.023 44 0.072 99.326 0.674 0.674E-02 \\Pyramids1 \ciients\Watts Plat\StormDrainage\WLEVEL3-2007-06-25.doc Last printed 6/25/2007 12:49:00 PM 0.026 16 0.026 99.353 0.647 0.647E-02 0.029 13 0.021 99.374 0.626 0.626E-02 0.031 17 0.028 99.401 0.598 0.598E-02 0.034 38 0.062 99.463 0.537 0.537E-02 0.037 38 0.062 99.525 0.475 0.475E-02 0.039 37 0.060 99.586 0.414 0.414E-02 0.042 52 0.085 99.67l 0.329 0.329E-02 0.045 23 0.038 99.708 0.292 0.292E-02 0.047 19 0.031 99.739 0.261 0.261E-02 0.050 27 0.044 99.783 o .2l7 0.217E-02 0.053 19 0.031 99.814 0.186 0.186E-02 0.056 14 0.023 99.837 0.163 0.163E-02 0.058 12 0.020 99.856 0.144 0.144E-02 0.061 15 0.024 99.881 0.119 o . 119E-02 0.064 3 0.005 99.886 0.114 o .1l4E-02 0.066 6 0.010 99.896 0.104 0.104E-02 0.069 9 0.015 99.910 0.090 0.897E-03 0.072 3 0.005 99.915 0.085 0.848E-03 0.074 6 0.010 99.925 0.075 0.750E-03 0.077 6 0.010 99.935 0.065 0.652E-03 0.080 13 0.021 99.956 0.044 0.440E-03 0.083 7 0.011 99.967 0.033 0.326E-03 0.085 3 0.005 99.972 0.028 0.277E-03 0.088 4 0.007 99.979 0.021 0.212E-03 0.091 1 0.002 99.980 0.020 o . 196E-03 0.093 5 0.008 99.989 0.011 o . 114E-03 0.096 4 0.007 99.995 0.005 0.489E-04 Duration Comparison Anaylsis Base File: wpre.tsf New File: wleve13. tsf Cutoff Units: Discharge in CFS -----Fraction of Time--------------Check of Tolerance------- Cutoff Base New %Change Probability 0.023 0.92E-02 0.68E-02 -26.5 I 0.92E-02 0.032 0.55E-02 0.57E-02 3.9 I 0.55E-02 0.042 0.37E-02 0.34E-02 -8.4 I 0.37E-02 0.051 0.24E-02 0.21E-02 -14 .1 I 0.24E-02 0.060 0.14E-02 0.12E-02 -17.0 I 0.14E-02 0.070 0.82E-03 0.90E-03 10.0 I 0.82E-03 0.079 0.54E-03 0.47E-03 -12.1 I 0.54E-03 0.089 0.36E-03 0.21E-03 -40.9 I 0.36E-03 0.098 0.l1E-03 O.OOE+OO -100.0 I o . 11E-03 0.107 0.98E-04 O.OOE+OO -100.0 I 0.98E-04 0.117 0.16E-04 O.OOE+OO -100.0 I 0.16E-04 Maximum positive excursion = 0.002 cfs ( 5.9%) occurring at 0.030 cfs on the Base Data:wpre.tsf and at 0.032 cfs on the New Data:wleve13.tsf Maximum negative excursion = 0.006 cfs (-21.9%) occurring at 0.027 cfs on the Base Data:wpre.tsf and at 0.021 cfs on the New Data:wleve13.tsf Base New %Change 0.023 0.020 -14.6 0.032 0.033 3.6 0.042 0.040 -3.3 0.051 0.048 -5.2 0.060 0.058 -3.4 0.070 0.072 3.7 0.079 0.078 -1. 3 0.089 0.082 -7.6 0.098 0.094 -4.3 0.107 0.094 -12.4 0.117 0.097 -17.0 \\Pyramids! \clients\Watts Plat\StormDrainage\WLEVEL3-2007-06-25.doc Last printed 6/25/2007 12:49:00 PM Eggebrecht short plat 2007-06-26 Basin 2 -Existing conditions Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:rowpre.tsf project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual peak Flow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of peak (CFS) 0.025 2 2/09/01 18:00 0.007 7 1/06/02 3:00 0.018 4 3/06/03 18:00 0.001 8 3/24/04 20:00 0.011 6 1/05/05 8:00 0.019 3 1/18/06 20:00 0.016 5 11/24/06 4:00 0.031 1 1/09/08 9:00 computed peaks ROWPRE.PKS -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- - -peaks - -Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0.031 1 100.00 0.990 0.025 2 25.00 0.960 0.019 3 10.00 0.900 0.018 4 5.00 0.800 0.016 5 3.00 0.667 0.011 6 2.00 0.500 0.007 7 1.30 0.231 0.001 8 1.10 0.091 0.029 50.00 0.980 page 1 Eggebrecht short plat 2007-06-26 Basin 2 -oeveloped conditions Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:rowdev.tsf project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.049 5 2/09/01 2:00 0.037 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.060 3 2/27/03 7:00 0.044 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.051 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.045 6 1/18/06 16:00 0.063 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.098 1 1/09/08 6:00 computed peaks ROWDEV.PKS -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- - -Peaks - -Rank Return prob (CFS) Period 0.098 1 100.00 0.990 0.063 2 25.00 0.960 0.060 3 10.00 0.900 0.051 4 5.00 0.800 0.049 5 3.00 0.667 0.045 6 2.00 0.500 0.044 7 1.30 0.231 0.037 8 1.10 0.091 0.086 50.00 0.980 page 1 Eggebrecht Short Plat -Offsite Facility Retention/Detention Facility Type of Facility: Tank Diameter: Tank Length: Effective Storage Depth: Stage 0 Elevation: Storage Volume: Riser Head: Riser Diameter: Number of orifices: Detention Tank 3.00 ft 242. ft 2.50 ft 0.00 ft 1523. cu. 2.50 ft ft 12.00 inches 3 Full Head Pipe Orifice # Height Diameter Discharge Diameter (ft) (in) (CFS) (in) 1 0.00 0.50 0.011 2 1. 88 0.84 0.015 4.0 3 2.25 0.63 0.005 4.0 Top Notch Weir: None Outflow Rating Curve: None Stage Elevation Storage Discharge Percolation (ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs) (cfs) 0.00 0.00 O. 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.01 0.01 5. 0.000 0.001 0.00 0.02 0.02 11. 0.000 0.001 0.00 0.03 0.03 16. 0.000 0.001 0.00 0.04 0.04 22. 0.001 0.001 0.00 0.05 0.05 28. 0.001 0.001 0.00 0.15 0.15 86. 0.002 0.003 0.00 0.25 0.25 147. 0.003 0.003 0.00 0.35 0.35 211. 0.005 0.004 0.00 0.45 0.45 278. 0.006 0.005 0.00 0.55 0.55 346. 0.008 0.005 0.00 0.65 0.65 416. 0.010 0.005 0.00 0.75 0.75 487. 0.011 0.006 0.00 0.85 0.85 559. 0.013 0.006 0.00 0.95 0.95 632. 0.014 0.007 0.00 1. 05 1. 05 704. 0.016 0.007 0.00 1.15 1.15 777. 0.018 0.007 0.00 1. 25 1.25 849. 0.019 0.008 0.00 1. 35 1. 35 920. 0.021 0.008 0.00 1. 45 1..45 990. 0.023 0.008 0.00 1. 55 1. 55 1058. 0.024 0.008 0.00 1. 65 1. 65 1125. 0.026 0.009 0.00 1. 75 1. 75 1189. 0.027 0.009 0.00 1. 85 1. 85 1250. 0.029 0.009 0.00 1. 88 1. 88 1268. 0.029 0.009 0.00 1. 89 1. 89 1274. 0.029 0.010 0.00 1. 90 1. 90 1280. 0.029 0.011 0.00 1. 91 1.91 1285. 0.030 0.012 0.00 1. 92 1. 92 1291. 0.030 0.013 0.00 1. 93 1. 93 1297. 0.030 0.014 0.00 1. 94 1. 94 1303. 0.030 0.014 0.00 2.04 2.04 1357. 0.031 0.018 0.00 \ \Pyramids 1 \clients\ Watts Plat\StorrnDrainage\ROWLEV3-2007 -06-25.doc Last printed 6/25/2007 1:59:00 PM Hyd 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2.14 2.24 2.25 2.26 2.27 2.28 2.29 2.30 2.31 2.41 2.50 2.60 2.70 2.80 2.90 3.00 3.10 3.20 3.30 3.40 3.50 3.60 3.70 3.80 3.90 4.00 4.10 4.20 4.30 4.40 4.50 2.14 2.24 2.25 2.26 2.27 2.28 2.29 2.30 2.31 2.41 2.50 2.60 2.70 2.80 2.90 3.00 3.10 3.20 3.30 3.40 3.50 3.60 3.70 3.80 3.90 4.00 4.10 4.20 4.30 4.40 4.50 Inflow Outflow Target 0.10 0.03 0.05 ******* 0.06 ******* 0.05 ******* 0.06 ******* 0.05 ******* 0.04 ******* 0.04 ******* Calc 0.07 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 1407. 1451. 1455. 1459. 1463. 1467. 1471. 14 74. 1478. 1508. 1523. 1523. 1523. 1523. 1523. 1523. 1523. 1523. 1523. 1523. 1523. 1523. 1523. 1523. 1523. 1523. 1523. 1523. 1523. 1523. 1523. Peak Stage 2.51 2.35 2.30 2.14 2.04 1. 40 0.91 0.90 Route Time Series through Facility Inflow Time Series File:rowdev.tsf Outflow Time Series File:rowlev3 0.032 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.034 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 Elev 2.51 2.35 2.30 2.14 2.04 1. 40 0.91 0.90 0.020 0.022 0.022 0.022 0.023 0.024 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.029 0.031 0.341 0.907 1. 640 2.430 2.720 2.970 3.210 3.430 3.640 3.830 4.020 4.190 4.370 4.530 4.690 4.840 4.990 5.130 5.270 5.410 Storage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft) 1523. 0.035 1489. 0.034 1475. 0.034 1406. 0.032 1358. 0.031 957. 0.022 602. 0.014 597. 0.014 Inflow/Outflow Analysis Peak Inflow Discharge: Peak Outflow Discharge: Peak Reservoir Stage: 0.098 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 0.072 CFS at 9:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 2.51 Ft Peak Reservoir Elev: 2.51 Ft Peak Reservoir Storage: 1523. Cu-Ft 0.035 Ac-Ft Flow Frequency Analysis \\Pyramidsl \clients\Watts Plat\StormDrainage\ROWLEV3-2007-06-25.doc Last printed 6/2512007 1:59:00 PM Time Series File:rowlev3.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak - -Peaks - -Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) (ft) Period 0.027 2 2/09/01 16:00 0.072 2.51 1 100.00 0.990 0.007 7 12/28/01 17:00 0.027 2.35 2 25.00 0.960 0.018 5 2/28/03 6:00 0.025 2.30 3 10.00 0.900 0.007 8 8/24/04 1:00 0.020 2.14 4 5.00 0.800 0.008 6 1/05/05 14:00 0.018 2.04 5 3.00 0.667 0.020 4 1/18/06 22:00 0.008 1. 40 6 2.00 0.500 0.025 3 11/24/06 6:00 0.007 0.91 7 1. 30 0.231 0.072 1 1/09/08 9:00 0.007 0.90 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.057 2.51 50.00 0.980 Flow Duration from Time Series File:rowlev3.tsf Cutoff Count Frequency CDF Exceedence_Probability CFS % % % 0.000 45349 73.955 73.955 26.045 0.260E+00 0.001 5547 9.046 83.001 16.999 o .170E+00 0.002 2377 3.876 86.877 13.123 0.131E+00 0.003 1430 2.332 89.209 10.791 0.108E+00 0.003 3188 5.199 94.408 5.592 0.559E-01 0.004 938 1. 530 95.938 4.062 0.406E-01 0.005 574 0.936 96.874 3.126 0.313E-01 0.005 1118 1. 823 98.697 1. 303 o .130E-01 0.006 307 0.501 99.198 0.802 0.802E-02 0.007 70 0.114 99.312 0.688 0.688E-02 0.008 174 0.284 99.596 0.404 0.404E-02 0.008 149 0.243 99.839 0.161 0.161E-02 0.009 55 0.090 99.928 0.072 O. ?l8E-03 0.010 2 0.003 99.932 0.068 0.685E-03 0.010 1 0.002 99.933 0.067 0.669E-03 0.011 2 0.003 99.936 0.064 0.636E-03 0.012 1 0.002 99.938 0.062 0.620E-03 0.013 0 0.000 99.938 0.062 0.620E-03 0.013 0 0.000 99.938 0.062 0.620E-03 0.014 2 0.003 99.941 0.059 0.587E-03 0.015 3 0.005 99.946 0.054 0.538E-03 0.015 4 0.007 99.953 0.047 0.473E-03 0.016 0 0.000 99.953 0.047 0.473E-03 O. 017 4 0.007 99.959 0.041 0.408E-03 0.018 1 0.002 99.961 0.039 0.391E-03 0.018 4 0.007 99.967 0.033 0.326E-03 0.019 3 0.005 99.972 0.028 0.277E-03 0.020 4 0.007 99.979 0.021 0.212E-03 0.020 3 0.005 99.984 0.016 0.163E-03 0.021 1 0.002 99.985 0.015 0.14 7E-03 0.022 a 0.000 99.985 0.015 0.147E-03 0.023 2 0.003 99.989 0.011 a .1l4E-03 0.023 2 0.003 99.992 0.008 0.815E-04 0.024 a 0.000 99.992 0.008 O.815E-04 0.025 0 0.000 99.992 0.008 0.815E-04 0.026 4 0.007 99.998 0.002 o .163E-04 Duration Comparison Anaylsis Base File: rowpre.tsf \\Pyramidsl Iclients\ Watts Plat\StormDrainage\ROWLEV3-2007-06-25.doc Last printed 6/25/2007 1:59:00 PM New File: rowlev3. tsf Cutoff units: Discharge in CFS -----Fraction of Tirne--------------Check of Cutoff Base New %Change Probability 0.006 0.67E-02 0.75E-02 12.2 I 0.67E-02 O.OOS 0.51E-02 o . 16E-02 -6S.1 I 0.51E-02 0.010 0.35E-02 0.6SE-03 -SO.3 I 0.35E-02 0.012 0.25E-02 0.62E-03 -75.6 I 0.25E-02 0.014 0.17E-02 0.60E-03 -65.4 I 0.17E-02 0.016 0.11E-02 0.47E-03 -55.4 I o . 11E-02 0.017 0.54E-03 0.41E-03 -24.2 I O.54E-03 0.019 0.29E-03 0.2SE-03 -5.6 I 0.29E-03 0.021 0.lSE-03 0.15E-03 -lS.2 I 0.lSE-03 0.023 0.llE-03 O.9SE-04 -14 .3 I o .11E-03 0.025 0.16E-04 0.82E-04 400.0 I 0.16E-04 Maximum positive excursion = 0.002 cfs ( S.S%) occurring at 0.024 cfs on the Base Data:rowpre.tsf and at 0.026 cfs on the New Data:rowlev3.tsf Maximum negative excursion = 0.008 cfs (-4S.9%) occurring at 0.017 cfs on the Base Data:rowpre.tsf and at 0.009 cfs on the New Data:rowlev3.tsf Base 0.006 O.OOS 0.010 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.017 0.019 0.021 0.023 0.025 Tolerance------- New %Change 0.007 7.4 0.007 -15.7 O.OOS -20.9 O.OOS -32.S O.OOS -40.5 0.009 -42.1 0.015 -14.5 0.019 -2.1 0.020 -4.0 0.023 -0.1 0.026 7.S \\Pyramidsl \clients\Watts Plat\StormDrainage\ROWLEV3-2007-06-25.doc Last printed 6/25/2007 1:59:00 PM n tM/'J.7/07 l:lJpm - \ \P)fcmldll \1:I1 .. II\WllIII PIot\StormOraInQg.\E~-eQIIn-WIIttl,dwg 00 !;~ ~~ Q o O'l " N "--l " o "--l ~~ fI:I~ z Q m X ~ Z Q o o Z o ~ o Z W . ~ I' L_J MONUMENT 2~ - BRASS IMTH PUNf.R" • ( r·r 'I L -....... CONDO CONDO s 6' WOOD FENCE u '""' 6' WOOD f"£NCEj--;-~ '" "e CHERRY 1 '" .... N LN REBAR CAP PBH 11332 F'ENCE Gm r~- l_. HOUSE:] I I. I I ::u m W::O 1lm ::OTI mm »::U O~ WO I~ mI ~m TIm 0» ::oW 02 m» ~::u »m r» mo 0» -r Zo 'TIc ~~ 3:~ ~O -Z Ow Z o m X W m~ »Z WQ ~TIZO mO-O ~::U" Z rm_o » w· -z~"--l~ OlliD O 11_»2 0U10W :"""'W::o mOm w»W » 0 c o::u n ::u m u fTI D D o c TI~» »Ir Omr r1l0 -::UTI ~OTI m 1l w WO -. ~ (J)m mTI Or ~O »~ ~W m~ ::u_ Or c r »m rm -0 ~-»~ Z::U O~ Om cO »» z::O ~O -c ::;!Z 0 z w o ..... - II m o O'l o g I ~ ~ - ~ m I i ~ 11 I RE~SIONS' mo. z ~ l': r; P -i l:; ~ 9 ~ i ri PYRAMID . ENGINEERING LLC 29015 MIUTARY ROAD SOUTH, PMB #544 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 PH 253-852-1 164 FAX 253-859-2065 EGGEBRECHT SHORT PLAT EXISTING CONDITIONS 11044-SE 192ND STREET. RENTON. WA 98055 KING COUNTY. WA5HINGTON ,; N0.1OlNIH5\fM ',uNnO::J OlNI>l ££086 \fM' N0.1N3101 '.L33Io1.15 ONZ61 35 -VVO I I SNOLL/ONO:::l 03dO,3A30 .lVld .lC:lOHS .lH:J3C:183883 o ill II o 0 (0 (') z o -r--- I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1--- I I I I I I I I CLZ I :::!:O UI= I (!)Z;,.: I .... Z~Z ."" ]Sf';OH _ ow « r-----------10..J-ClI= -~ I '-I / ~ / i r-I un 11// I L __ ,//f /f / I Z I ,---"" ~-~, ~~ ~'''> ' " '\ /' :-'\ ./- \" ,/ ~'~~-"/ --- \,/';J} I /;>L r)' / L __ i I I I I I I I ! r- ./ .-',,- _".,," __ • .c -~,_"' _._". I 1_ J 990Z-699-&9Z x ..... .,:j '1>'9 L L-Z9B-£SC: Hd £0086 'riM 'A'rIM "·f~3Q3..:1 111>'9# 8V11d 'HJ.nos a"o~ A~VJ.I'tVll9 1062: :::l" 8J 8NICl33NI8N3 a I VI/'v'Cl}" d 'CddY :SNOISIh3't1 n:: ~ WI- (/):::l o :::!:z~ n::«~ Ow 1---' (/) U '-" on J I r ---- i _J L l0e Z o l- o Z o -___ 0 o W Il. o ...J - ---- - - ----w ::JON).:! IJOOM ,Q I ,-J I OONOO DONO:) Gi a 1_ __J l __ ,-__ J I' I ,-' , 1 __ 1 kp'lnOM-I4I08-AIa\a6cuIIDJ(]I1U:IlS\IDId IIIOM\'l~\ {J\\ -LI.I01I:t LOIa/oo \Ie ~_4