The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMartin Property® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services OAK-DE-0100 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055 "CPLN/CR King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 I :;:----:---------..-:, lt?~!LED FROM KIRK!.ANDC\I\/A .. '9·8-0.34·""--·,-- ;""\'\ iS; '-(..':', " I '<:: '. ·r-.:,::.' :'.".=:•.: ·, TP' > r-~ :-, (_/) \---r-r: r; :~ --:, .· • ,-. l '3t!:-G:5t--i 2 i ·j > I/ ,i fl i 1/ i ,ll, 11,i' i II I I j, 11 l ii !Ii, I 11, Iii Ii! l i Ii I! ii 1,; l i ! ii - . .,. ; . • King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 L05P0019 -Martin Subdivision DOES Project Number -' ·,.) ', . \ m~:.~!:® ~\ """ • f\ 11 r. ~ ,,., n. n E.S. I,_'----r--'-"--KJ"---'S=--·=-o D~"'--'-'CJ""-'"n""O_,__r-J ___ ,, hereby affirm that I have post&MhMd!ltlwmg: (print name) X Notice of Permit Application o: Other --------------- on the '-/1': day of ,Jo ·rLM/ur , 2005, in accordance with the Department of Development and Environmental Services' requirements. I further affirm that the notice will remain in place and visible during the full required notice period. Notice was provided at the following location(s): I) 2) ________________________ ~ 3) I hereby affirm that the above is a true and correct statement. Exhibit No. :---=~------ Item No. L@Pt:>S>t?; Recai•1ed ~ • <,2 -C)'.+ Ki110 County Hearing Examiner This affidavit must be completed and returned to the Land Use Services Division within 7 days of posting. Improper posting or·failure to return the affidavit within 7 days shall be cause for the final decision regarding your permit to be postponed. CPSFORMS/AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING.DOC 7/27/99 ~----------------- King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 October 26, 2005 • Notice Board & PostingProcedures .. Instruction. Package . Noti~e ~fApp}ication . LOSP0019 In accordance with King County Code Section 20.20.060, enclosed you will find instructions, specifications, and materials in order to meet the notice of application posting requirements of the County. Please read these instructions carefully and take action quickly to order your notice board sign. Your notice board sign can be ordered through a sign painter, using the information supplied on page 2 of the enclosed "Notice Board Requirements." The cost of the sign is the responsibility of the applicant. Further processing of your appiication is dependent upon fulfilling the notice of application posting requirement. When your sign is in place, attach the colored laminated hOtice of appiication along with the plastic envelope ( containing extra copies of the notice of application) to the notice board as depicted on page 1 of the instructions. Maintain a supply of notices within the plastic envelope throughout the comment period. The posting sign/notice board must remain in place throughout the duration of your application. Immediately upon completion of the above instructions. complete the enclosed affidavit of posting and return to the Department of Development and Environmental Services, Land Use Division. Current Planning Section, at the address shown above (envelope enclosed). Failure to comply with posting requirements may be cause for a delay in the processing of your application. If you have any questions, please call the Land Use Services Division at (206) 296-6600. Enclosures: Notice Board Requirements-Application Laminated Notice of Application Waterproof Vinyl Envelope containing copies of the Notice of Application Affidavit of Notice of Application Posting form/LUSD return envelope Notice Board & Posting Procedures Instruction Pkg.-NOA 81810 I • King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 , LOSP0019-Martin Subdivision DDES Project Number • !, ______________ , hereby affirm that I have posted the following: (print name) X Notice of Permit Application 0 Other --------------- on the day of , 2005, in accordance with the Department of Development and Environmental Services' requirements. I further affirm. that the notice will remain in place and visible during the full required notice period. Notice was provided at the following location(s): I) 2) __________________________ _ 3) I hereby affirm that the above is a true and correct statement. Signature This affidavit must be completed and returned to the Land Use Services Division within 7 days of posting. Improper posting or failure to return the affidavit within 7 days shall be cause for the final decision regarding your permit to be postponed. CPSFORMS/AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING.DOC 7/27/99 ® • . ' NOTICE BOARfREQlJIREMENTS- . . .. NOTICE: OF APPLICATION King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1212 Per King County Code Section 20.20.060, a notice board must be prepared and posted for your land use application. Please prepare and post in the following manner: Notice Board Size and Text Specific~tions The notice board shall be constructed to the specifications described below. The notice board shall display the information shown in the figure. Board Construction: The notice board shall be constructed with 4' x 4' plywood. Professionally prepared plastic notice board overlays, permanently affixed to the board are permissible. Notice boards may be reused but they must be clean and show no evidence of former wording. 1. Lettering style: Helvetica or similar standard typeface 2. Lettering size: · Title should be 3" capital letters (NOTICE OF PROPOSED LAND USE ACTION). Other letters should be 2" letters except on the 811." x 14" laminated paper providing the details of the proposal. See illustration below for use of capital and lower case letters, and placement of laminated paper and vinyl jacket. 3. Lettering: Black (permanent ink or silk-screen) 4. Background Color: White 5. Logo: King County emblem, in black 6. Laminated Notice of Application on a legal size sheet which provides information regarding the proposed land use application. TO BE SUPPLIED BY Land Use Services Division (LUSD) (see enclosed). 7. Legal size waterproof vinyl jackets with a fold flap, and wrap string. TO BE SUPPLIED BY LUSD (see enclosed). The applicant must make copies of the Notice, place them in the vinyl jacket, and maintain a supply of copies throughout the posting period. 4 FT ® NOTICE OF PROPOSED LAND USE ACTION King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton. Washington 98055-1219 Call (206) 296-6600 Type of Action: Proposal: File No.: NOTICE OF APPLICATION 8.5" X 14" LAMINATED 4 FT EXAMPLE COPIES OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION IN VINYL JACKET Notice Board Requirements-NOA 8/8/01 Pg 1 ~----------------------------------------------~ The notice board shall be located and installed to the specifications described below. Number of Notice Boards required for this application: ONE { 1 ) Special Instructions: Notice board shall be located: One board along the property frontage on 148th Ave SE • Midpoint on the site street frontage or as otherwise directed by LUSD staff to maximize visibility. • At a location 5 feet inside from the street property line; a notice board structurally attached to an existing building shall be exempt from the setback provisions, provided that no notice board is located not more than 5 feet from the property line without approval from LUSD staff. • So that the top of the notice board is between 7 to 9 feet above grade. , So that it is easily accessible and totally visible to pedestrians. The applicant shall erect the notice board by solidly setting the post 12 to 18 inches into the ground; or structurally attached it to an existing building. Two 4" x 4" 8-foot-long (minimum) posts and four washers, bolts and nuts (3/8-inch diameter and bolts are 5-inches long) shall be used to install the notice board. Installation Certification ' ,/', j ' ,;\"'; The·notice board{s) must beJnstailed within 14 days after Land Use Services Division has determined that the application .is complete. The enclosed."Affidavit of Posting" must be sighed•, and returned ,to:tlie Land .Use Services Division , within 7 days following the,date,of•posting. . . Maintenance ~nd·Remo~al ofthe Notice Board The applicant shall maintain the notice board in good condition throughout the application review period, which shall extend through the time of the final county decision on the proposal and the expiration of any applicable appeal periods. If the notice board is removed, LUSD review of the land use application may be discontinued until the notice board is replaced and has remained in place for the required period of time. TO BE FILLED OUT BY LUSD STAFF -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTICE BOARD TEXT INFORMATION (To Be Given to the Sign Painter) Type of Action: Formal Subdivision Proposal: Subdivide 3.71 acres into 13 lots for the development of single-family detached residences. File No.: L05P00.19 Martin Subdivision NOTE: If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 206-296-6600 (voice) orfor hearing impaired 206-296-7217. Notice Board Requirements-NOA 8/B/01 Pg 2 • • NOTICE INSTRUCTIONS 1. Number of sign boards required: 1 2. Location of sign boards: Along the property frontage on 148 1h Ave. SE 3. Cities located within one mile: Renton 4. Mail Notice to: • Affected tribes • Applicant • Community groups • Abo.ve-noted city _; Affidavit of Publication 3282334 / 3 State of Washington, Counties of King and Snohomish, Mary C. Hiatt being duly sworn, says that he/she is the Authorized Agent of Seattle Times Company, publisher of The Seattle Times and representing the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, separate newspapers published daily in King and Snohomish Counties, State of Washington: that they are newspapers of general circulation in said Counties and State; that they have been approved as legal newspapers by orders of the Superior Court of King and Snohomish Counties; that the annexed, being a classified advertisement, was published in: I 0/31/05 And not in a supplement thereof, and is a true copy of the notice as it was printed and/or distributed in the regular and entire issue of said paper or papers during all of said period, and that said newspaper or newspapers were regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 31st day of October, 2005 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at Seattle t\b ~ ~ [L [\J IS) ~ ,, ' [\J IS) IS) .... If) ~ ~ A STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Tom Meagher, being fll'St duly sworn on oath that he is the Legal Advertising Represeltlative of the King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact farm annexed was published in regular issues of the King County Journal (and not in supplement limn) which was regularly distributed to its subscribe"' during the below stJlled period. The annexed notice. a Public Notice was published on October JI, 2005. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum ofSZ68.50. ~ ~,,,,um;,,,,,, ~ I --. ~'fli-:f. t,.~r.'~ c::::71 ,# 0~ "'OT~~ ~ ~ Tom Meagher ii~ ~ Legal Advertising Representative, King Counly Jounjt EXP. 5: Subscribed and sworn to me this 2.. day of Decemb4 ~ . 04/28/200 9 ~Ii!:,: ~~ '"-•C. ;:: ~;~ ~-uan>~~ §, ~ ·--~,,. Op WA'l»;,,,~ .,,,, . ., ..... ,- Jody L. n Notaryblicfm-hltate of Washington, Residing in Auburn, Washington PO Number: Cost of publishing this notice includes an affidavit surcharge. KING OOUNI'Y DEP'J: OF DEVELOPMl!NT & l!NVJRONMl!NTALSER11ICES (DDES) 800 Oakesdale Ave SW, Bentoo,WA-.1219 NorJCB OF LANDJJfil PRBH!T APPIJCAUQNA BB9UJST: FOBMM SIJRDM- ~ l..061'11015 Lakeview Sul>liri.- •m Applicant Sabnnt Singh Location, Located on SE 43rd St, app= mile -of tbe 6E 43rd St and 164thAYeSEin1enedion. Propooal: Subdmde 4.65 ...... zan..i R-4 into IO hrto for m,gJs filmily detached remdeOLlOII. Program Manage<: T....hah Bull, 206-2116-6758 REQUES:C FQ]IMAL SIJBDMSIDN - l!ile: L061'0019 Martin Subdiviaion Applicant: CamWeet DEWelo_pment. SaraSlatton Locatioa, Locab>d approx. 12011. ""81; of 148t!tAve SE, oortll of NE 6th St, south of SE 125th St and eaet of 144th Pl SE Proposal: Sabdivid-e 3.71 acres into . 13 Jots for single family cletadied resi- denres. l'rqp-am Ma,iager. Lmm,y llenoch, 206-296-al82 COMMENT PHQCEmJRES-Com- men1s on the above files are oow 1,e;ng ._ptec1 by Kina< County DDES, I.and Use Servka, Di-.u.ion, at the addrese tislal above. Plume, 206-296- 6600. REQUEST; 8JIQRT SJJBDllllllION fie: L0590051 Applica,,t: Jam.., Lee Locstimi: Lo<eted at 16404 SE Newport Wq, lsaaquah Prop:,,a!, s.bdmsion 0.85 """' £:::" mned R-4 inm 3 MO!entlal Pn,ject Mansa,,r: Fereahteh llehlordi, 206-296-7173 COMMENT PRQCEDURES: DDES will issua a deeiaion on this appli- tatioa f'oUowing a 21-day comment period ending.,. December 1. !1.006. Written a:imments and additioDBI information etm. be ob!ained by con- tacting the project manager at the phone numhm, listed above. Published in the King Couaey Jomnal October Bl, 200.. tJ8498a2 <ff t 8 u.) ~ I!- ?. 4. "7. .. .. •• <® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 November I 0, 2005 •• TO: Kim Claussen, Project/Planner Manager III, Current Planning Section FM: Pat Simmons, Engineer II, Engineering Review Section Via: Ray Floren!, Engineer III,Engineering Review Section Planner: Lanny Henock RE: Proposed Plat of martin Property LUSD File No. LOSPOOl 9 Comments of the above project 1. Need 2 Temporary Benchmarks within the application site along with appropriate elevation and Datum(per KCC l 9A.08. l 50(B)(2)). One shown 2. The contours must be based on a field survey per KCC 19A.08.150(B)(2). A statement to this effect must be shown on the preliminary map. 3. The 1904 easement for a alignment of power poles should be extinguished or plotted 4. No proof of separate legal was provided. The deed must be dated prior to Oct I, 1972. MAIN! IFlllE COP)f , ' • • Rogers, Carol From: Rogers, Carol Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 9:54 AM To: 'Legals'; 'legals.bellevue@kingcountyjournal.com' Subject: Legal ads for publ. on Monday, 10/31 L05P0015, L05P0019, L05S0051 Please confirm receipt Please publish the accompanying, legal notice in your newspaper on MONDAY. October 31. 2005, which will meet our minimum legal notice requirement. Should this not be possible, please call or fax me immediately. Submit your invoice and 3 copies of the affidavit of publication to Accounts Payable, as soon after publication as possible, in order for us to enter legal proof of publication in our file records, and so that we may process same for payment. Attachment: Legal Notice KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DOES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219 . NOTICE OF LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATIONS REQUEST: FORMAL SUBDIVISION File: Applicant: L05P0015 Lakeview Subdivision Satwant Singh Location: Located on SE 43"' St, approx Y. mile east of the SE 43'' St and 164'" Ave SE intersection. Proposal: Subdivide 4.65 acres zoned R-4 into 10 lots for single family detached residences. Program Manager: Trishah Bull, 206-296-6758 REQUEST: FORMAL SUBDIVISION File: Applicant: L05P0019 Martin Subdivision CamWest Development, Sara Slatten Location: Located approx. 120ft west of 1481" Ave SE, north of NE 5"' St, south of SE 125'" St and east of 144"' Pl SE Proposal: Subdivide 3.71 acres into 13 lots for single family detached residences. Program Manager: Lanny Henoch, 206-296-6632 COMMENT PROCEDURES: Comments on the above files are now being accepted by King County DDES, Land Use Services Division, at the address listed above. Phone: 206-296-6600. REQUEST: SHORT SUBDIVISION File: L05S0051 Applicant: James Lee Location: Located at 16404 SE Newport Way, Issaquah Proposal: Subdivision 0.65 acre parcel, zoned R-4 into 3 residential lots. Project Manager: Fereshteh Dehkordi, 206-296-7173 COMMENT PROCEDURES: DDES will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day comment period ending on December 1. 2005. Written comments and additional information can be obtained by contacting the project manager at the phone number listed above. Published this 31'' day of October, 2005 cc: Accounts Payable, Administrative Services Division, DDES Application File(s): L05P0015; Lakeview application notice. L05P0019; Martin application notice. L05S0051; Lee short plat application notice. Seattle Times acct #078871004 1 r I • • · g_dit !,'.Jew fl!rmat . From:: To: ·:i ' lrJ.ie.~ IGJ~~~toNl~i:iF~d Xl~i::v: Tom~r~:~@Wngcouht~.com] ' ' .. . . ,, .· ·. '• ' y ' • Rogers, carol ' ' ' :.. ' ' ' ,f i •, , :i,ecurity ... Eonts • l::l!gh lmportance·ltem ,.·' ' ,, ' ' ") f' \ . Sent: Fri 10/21/2005 10:05 AM Hi Again, Caroll I have received your email, and will publish the notice (Re/File LD5P0015, LD5P0019 and LD5S0051) in the 10/3Ml5 edition of the King County Journal. Thanks again, Caroll Tom Meagher Legal Advertising Representative King County Journal Newspapers Phone: 253-234-3512 or 425-453-4296 Fax: 253-859-9268 or 425-635-0602 -----Originel Message-· Fnm: Rogers, Carol (mailto:Carol.Rogers@METROKC.OOV] Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 9:54 AM To: 'Logals'; '1"gels.bellevue@kmgeountyjoumel.com' Subject: Legel ads forpubl on Monday, 10/31 LOSPOOl5, LOSPOOl9, LOSSOOS1 Friday. Oct 21, 2005 10:12AM r • • . ;):lit ~ew 1'\ll'.mat. Iools tielp . I . • ' ~ B.e!>IY• [ ~~ to.AU I ~~i,fw.a,d · )< !.,~ (';,: ' • } ' ' i ,. L, <'. J\l •·: ; ~Jk,; .. E~ • ~gh !mpi,tt..;h,,,it..;, I t ,11:~.1 • • + • it. I (ij • . i ... ;: •.• •• i • ;:::I: I ·,. •. .'sent: ~ 10/21/200510:21 AM Hi Carol, Your Legal Ad #3262334 will run Monday, October 31, 2005 for$ 129.00 Thanks, Eleanor ---original Message--- From: Rogers, carol [mailtx:J :Ciirol.Rogers©>METROKC.GOV] Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 9 :54 AM To: Legals; 'legals.belle\/U8@klngcountyjournal.com' Subject: Legal acls fur pub!. on Monday, 10/31 LOSPOOlS, L05P0019, L05S0051 Pl-co11firm receipt. Please· publish the accompanying, legal notice in your newspaper on MONDAY, October 31, 2005. which will meet our minimum legal notice requirement. Should this not be possible. please call or fax me Immediately. Submit your invoice and 3 copies of the affidavit of publication to Acco1111ts Payable, as soon after publication as possible, in order for us to enter legal proof of publication in our file records, and .soth.~t.we. may process same for payment. Friday, Oct 21, 2005 10:32 AM i' L . ' • Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton. Washington 98055-1219 Noffce of Application (Type 3) ·.1, .,·:.,, : . .:i .· ,\:,-,, .. ,,.:, ··::-<:·...:\ <<· ;:/ .,, .. :_/:_·; '/'\ .. ,:_ ... }.,,,' .. ),'., ·>· )· '. \'·:-:' : ... · :-;;:· .. ·, .-.:';:' __ ,:.-' _·:· '.·: Peflnits~~i:\~e~t~d:iri thi~.··appli~;ti;~:•.··•For,,'..a.1:Pla,.t,, ,..,.., ,-.......... ,, '•' "· ,. '. , .. ·" '" ' ' ., ' ... , ., ..... ,, .. , .. ,-, :R~.IE!. vaht,:e11~iton~J~t~1'86curri~nti ~re available at·the address below: .. ,," . . . . ' '. ,-_-,. ' ,, '' '."' ' ' QgYes D NIA ';pr,v 719p~~bt:[~~fo~t~;~:to ;~7;;u,s,e? forpr9j~c:f \1)itigati9~ ... kn<l~~;~t Jl)i~JirT1~: ,,.,1$C~ :~1A,.inclucling, Critical •t ,·,,,,.:··· · ~r~a r~~~l~t.1~nsi .~oa,~:l>.t.indarcl~, Sur:f~~~ Waterpe~1gn Man.u.al ,:,., ,· ·· '· ; .' · ,,)'·_, _ .. /:, _,)·.,·: _.;i·.),,,.\'}i'J,,>?.!>\\, .. :_/'. ·::_.:1;'/\ '1, :·:·' -: '.-Y_.·;, '·>.:::./i:''.::.'J:'•i:-'.\"\.l\::i.::?.\', :: :--·,,:_:.' \. _ .: ;_,, -:,,· _ 1 '_ ;'-_,,.. ·" _._,,(:,.'·, ... :·!··:_ <.: : ', '_;', .:.::.': '.' .. : . , :' , ·:?:.· .: _ .,- :, c;o,~si,5;t.e~.?Y ,wi\h.~PPl.ica~I~(· ~91J~ty::p1a~i 13h~.··~!lg~!~t!8n~: ::,1-~i~pr(!~~~,l ',ll(i,I l,,b~rrevie,wed., f9r .com plia .n~~ · . . w1th,all.appl1cable;;K1ng eounty:codes; nicludmg.those noted abol(ei · · · ' J.-.. ,. < , _ ,·· .. ~ ;,·,':.-,_i_:,);_),,:j\:/:::: . \):::::::),::: .:)(':_,_· "}·:::y;:;~::?,:::_:<:i:-::, ,:_:._: / ::_'':';.:t'./'_';/i:-)i':·:1·:::':\1:,.\': :. :'::.:: ·,·: _, ,., .. :\.:.: .. :: !::·· ,:: : · '._/ . ."., ,: .. ·,::;: .··/-':,, "•·-· ... ;:, .. ,' .. -.. :: : .', _<: !·. , . SC>theripermit~ not·· in Cl uded :in :.this !application; known ,at this time:,, building ·.·perm its' , ·": , " ,_-,-, \ ,· ":,'[.-... ;_' · '. ":',: ·-.:.--.,_,_· ,' ,. · , _.,. ~ -·,.-, · :;':"·,,._';;_."'·' ·, · '·.-',!:,;,!. .):;;:!1,:·.;.-,,;,;,:;::,'i,'·.'! .-,_,,1_.'·,'·--·1;;;,,;,. .. , i.'. -, ..... ,,-,"-, ,::."' -,,,,,· ,--· :,_;, :,, A public hearing before the King County Hearing Examiner is required for this application. Notification of the public hearing date will occur approximately 30 days prior to the scheduled hearing date. The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) will issue a report and recommendation to the Hearing Examiner two (2) weeks prior to the scheduled public hearing. Following the close of the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner will issue a written decision which may be appealed to the Metropolitan- King County Council. Details of the appeal process will be included in the notice of recommendation. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact ODES at the address . and/or telephone number listed below. Written comments may also be submitted to DOES .. You may review the application and any environmental documents or studies in our Renton office. NOTE: If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 206-296-6600 (voice) or for hearing impaired 206-296-7217 (TIY). Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Mailing Date: November 9, 2005 ----------------------------------------------------- Please send me notification of the public hearing and other official notices concerning this application. File No.: L05P0019 -Martin Subdivision ( Please print ) · Name:. __ ·------------------------------- Address: ______________________________ _ Telephone No.: --------- King County has received an application to develop property at the address listed above. You are receiving this notice because our records Indicate that you own property within approximately 500 feet of the proposal @ '.t:·~ :,:; (") 0 CJ m 9> :,~;,. I ',, 'j,[' ~ ~· 1· . ·.... I . , ,, ,. , ---,==<=·-·, I ·,, \ , .: \• ~ ; ,I, 1/\ \', r:1 ~----: •• --I ', \H ' ' I: •' ·-.. ./. t· ' ', ,,, \ 'I\) ,,. , .-:, . , -. -, -~,; ·-'s _ _jlj_,._ : \ I\ i \ /1. £....., I, :-\ ',, \ '. , 1:, \ ',,. '· '-, : ,f 'I .!,lj; 1' ··-----:,, , '.' ' '.)J, I ·-c----r' •; \ · -I.'. -~\ ', ',...'.. \ ~ ',6.';,°"'· ::_~~-' . ,\, \ . /ij ' " • ! ' r, •·---· -' ', ' ' \ ' \ ' --"-----l -~ ' I { ' , , •.• , • •/ I ' ' I •/'·_.-· .,,, --·c-SE,'f2.4ffl i-'---~_µ, i' i ... :.,, ----•::: .)· :-\..J--. / ·H,\ \ : .tj. , "T-,·--\·'[~J<~'gr~-: · · .. -<7f~-r+:.~--\~:-. ·--~::· ----------- • l I , 11.J I ,, , ' ' \ ,• ' t ' / .. '. I ' ' .•, Ir -·--j-- ' · , · .-· ·_,;;~_ :,, 1 \ .. -:-.,_ . \~\, .. \, 'i \ t, ·. ·; '"'.'. ,\" \: 1··~, I --1,---, r ( ' ' ·. \ H'' ' . -j \ Vlj ' ' ' ,,, ,. I ··. _ ___:\ '-. \ , ,. · ~-'-t-· • CI:"·,:.·~ ; ·, ·,~---·,ii I I I I ' ,,._./' , \ '··-, \ \ :', ' I r n--~µ-J·, I', ',j' ·v, ,ri I I 1' . --!.. __ ~· -,., \ ' \ • ;JA ' '\ \ I ' 'I l' 1---" ' ' \ '-,:\ 11:., \ I ! · · · · · ·-:.:";> ,, '-, i--\iL-· ', I , \ ·-· ' · ' · ' ' .. '··· ·,1-ci,1f __ __j • I I . , , , .... \ \ \. ', ,·j; \;I::~·,, '/; :','. ) \,;.~ : -"']-_L ___ -I -~ ~ \, \ '\ • ; \ f,...: \ IE \ \ 4 l ' -... -\' ' I ! i "· ' ' -I t ' • ' .\ ', I ! ' ; '. <c ·-i· ' I ·, ' [', . '. --' j.~,: ' '.: ', ', ·1~ I I .. •· ·\· , ; ; ., l'':1-'-' ' ' I ' i/' 1,,-,,/\ \'• 1J! I I • . \ \, ; : \ ·-. i ~ /~ I SE. 125,-T-H~STREEF'~, ·,_k': ,. '\'lr'' -----,_ I I ' ,. ' 16 R-0--W DED/CA110N . 1 ' ' I l I , ' _:;_\.-\-{\ (\ ' \ I''' I ----- --• ·,-· ....... ··\\,/rx-so.'EASEM'wr-FOR 'i ·.. 'LI 1-: zJ•,r I ', I • .. ·, 'i'; \).'·,, ' ;; i,..:) I --1 t ~ -----~ ·,;{·-.. -· J.Y!fGIJESS 4No EGREss~ r-, , , , : R:;;-.. •J ·. !'·· l ,CL:---- 1 ,, Q) L . I I . . "'\ I--:;~ ~-..\. / ·. 1· '',, i f ·. ·. , ', ··ii . i ·, '. '. ':I--: SCT pa£ ·1 • : i-. • . • . ___:,. cs--..!_ ,i----, , 1, '/ . 'm' , ~ 1,./ \ l,...,J aa·ABOl£GRAD£/---__ r:c:;l ' , t( ', ' . , ,,-. NB8-, / ' ' ,., ,_ ., , ' EL-<Ur ' l LJUU ;· I-":"---.. ---, ' • '"' ' -·'· ,v<2"W 631.25'.£ ' • ' '' \ ', ·, \ ·, \ 1 I : I (/) I \ ' '. . CT O 7. • ' " (' .... _, • -\ • ,-, .·--'r-' ' ---t, ' I rn = \ ; ; , .. d N SPACE/ : • ,,._ ~ \ "· , lf·'-" "·· , , 2.. • ·.,; . : L , i -0 ~u I' (!Jr' .... ·REC. ' ' ~ •/ . h. .., -----, I ,._, \su1J pJtAfv~ck-. ~C/)i !9.01~,. .. '., '1\ \~ 2 ~ 1;ci! h..(. s'. '.;;; NrJo~"fi JN .. ]'~"F ZONEj _____ l l "° = sHAMR \ ~\ 'TiRAcT B :! -.., >q.'-~ \ ' 1, '. ~ ~ t 't ··. 1..r ~1·:~· · '1 R- 4 1 1 11 N ~ ' 'i OPEN SPACf.1., ., ~ ~ -,,. ' : ' ' i , :!\ 6 \ · · ' ' l L C:,, L::'.:::J lz ';I: 'lc-RE• \ , • ,o-. ---· 50 ·-601 '\ ., , , bl I I i \ r------J L ~ r:;-:;i ',I~ ,"cl ~-I0.4!'SF ~ ·. b '. ROAOA:};; : 1r:'.R > · w2-'• ~,'._ ·_-, __ _, ;\ '1-J I------\ @) uuu . .,, _____ , '-:.._, \ ... ~.-~ •· \'9 ' \r ,02· ·• \ .JL':"~~.0 ,' ' ii----'1 1 1 I ' ! I -::i:: • ,,_.-, ,, -,,.\ .,.,> :--, , . 7 \bill ! ! ttt 1 1· t -~ " ·i-.; ' ', ~-;i l ~ \ /J ' ' :lo ,\ ,~"' ·" 6 ------L : ' ,, .. ""., -> '\ ,'':I-.' .. /"""(.· \r26' ,z, ·--~ ,f,~-' U6' i,, "'· '1 • I -----L--1 ' I ' ' \ , I / ':I-I ·,,. ' \,. • '· , Rel,,, '-. ' J!l .. I ii . • • •\ . , ,-. < , TRACT C l, ::J /2 i ~, --1'&. 8 . b ~ j :2 I ·I ' , i'), ' 1 --..... •: ,_ DETEN'(ION · 126> ':', --\ ') • ' ~J.8----"'1 1· ""'r·-~--,,.•--.-:. '}' • • ; J , ··... , \ 23,248 SF , " -10 -· oo ', I'< --il I • ..:.. ' ~/ <2 ., ' ~ ' "" ' ' I I I--~ . -.;.., ~ :~ ··~ f "' l() ........ // \ 0, \ • \, I SE ~. I -~. ~' .. ;..""'-' -.· . ._ ____ ' \ I ~~.,,-:::'_ ' -' ' / '. 9 ' 'ii, I I CORNER. NE 1/4, SE 1/4, SE 1/4. SEC 10 ~--,,.,...._ .,,. 1 ~ ' I ~ 146'" \ ' \,,:, I ... ,. ~ ... _, -I I''" __ ...... -/, f-,-N ~ '98"~--.• ._ . ' I 1 -! 1 Q' :° ... --· --· r\---1 Ir· -·1 I i w 1 ·112 EX. fmu;nf;;;iro ...J~ ... ~ L KING COUNTY • i --··, 1....__ -I I j\ JI! JI jr°'1 --11.fE-REMffEDTYP, .. r--1 I I ............... --hsl I :'.-------.... ._.;__ .. /~ ~-f /L . ..r--I 11_ JI L -~/LL..,__: I I ; I I CITY OF RENTON I: I I ---ktJE 5TH STREETif'i' 1 -t:-iL-~REJY]'Of'L .J.. 1 I '-·-· I ! ~ I -~ --/'! ' "' R-'S'"' -...=IMCTD I '--1 1 1 " :1. ; . r. ---~ .1 ~ , ._.. ,of/,ITUSEDRIVEW~ 1---1 1 1. f-----~ I ., i I . r \ , . --..... -.--5£ . -, .. . ----- 1 • , , ) ' --,--· r;' 1 1 ~ I -' l ti'> 1 , f, . ,:··· . ti \ I/ . ( I ·"'J_.ACr:.. I : I ! .. I I I / lif i ,f,{iiLI';{:¥/" . / ( 50' dAN f , ' , ' I : ~ ~ I f--~L..:.._U;J F,, .. -·~· 0 7fk I / '1 · aoR I pl.Ar I · )- 1 ~\::I d , ' ' ,:-:7-:-~ [;, ~,t;,,.. • .. i; / i Mt.:: ; _.:___ :s: I . . "... . • / I • J ·1~-4! .;:,,;, .' ;tt~",,.,,;;,-;_·· /1 / ., . I , :, ·I <::( r--{.... . .I / • , I I ,-, , '.: ; ~{>',>. ,,,;,]',,;~~ ;,-:'--·-·' 1 · :.-!: · . : :. I I , , ... ' · .. · ·/ I ~· "1' , ;llf~-~~. """-'iF)'""'· ,.,,.,,,,.~ t; • .-, ...... , i . I . I Cl) \· , ··~ , • . I I .·-.. -r ~:.,;:v,,~f{,i:'~;":",'.',-.. 1J1t'::,O:~'$\'.:i'1··:·.· __ r ,· _." ! ; n'' .,,. I . ~ + ' ... a ,-· • L "'·-····-· ... '.· ' ' ' ' :---, ;:::: I ' , •• , ........... ' '/ I 1·-------------1--. I ----t-= I ® • Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Applicant: C:amWest Development Attn: Sara Slatten . . . . · 9720 IIIE 120thPl.,.Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 425,82501955 Noffce of Application File#:·· L05P0019 -Martin Subdivision ,' " , , , .... :•·.' "',',' ', I,, ,, ' ,'' . ' . , . · ODES Project Manager: . Lanny. Henoch ·· Telephone No.: 206-296-6632 . . . Email· address:'.lanny.henoch@111etrokc.gov Date Application 1:ilf!ld:. ~ept~"'!b~r 28, 2005 .Date Determined Complete: October 26, 2005 Project Location: Lying approx.120 feet west of 1481h Ave, SE, north of NE 5th St. (in the City of.Renton), south ofSE 125\h S((to be,constructedin King County), and east of 14:41h Place SE (to be constructed:in King County). · · (Type 3) Project Description: subdivision of 3. 71 acres into 13 lots for thedevelopment ~f detached. single- family residences. · Permits requested in.this application: Formal·Plat Relevant environmental documents are available at the address below: l8J Yes D N/A Development regulations to be used for .project mitigation, known at this time: . KCC 21Aincluding Critical Area regulations, Road Standards/Surface ,Water-Design Manual Consistency with applicable County plans. and regulations: This proposal wiU be. ~~vie~ed for compliance with.all applicable King County codes, including those.noted.ab.ove. · . . . Other permits not included in this application, known. at this time: l>uilding permits A public hearing before the King County Hearing Examiner is required for this application. Notification of the public hearing date will occur approximately 30 days prior to the scheduled hearing date. The Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) will issue a report and recommendation to the Hearing Examiner two (2) weeks prior to the scheduled public hearing. Following the close of the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner will issue a written decision which may be appealed to the Metropolitan- King County Council. Details of the appeal process will be included in the notice of recommendation. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact ODES at the address and/or telephone number listed below. Written comments may also be submitted to DOES. You may review the application and any environmental documents or studies in our Renton office. NOTE: If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 206-296-6600 (voice) or for hearing impaired 206-296-7217 (TTY). Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Mailing Date: November 91 2005 Please send me notification of the public hearing and other official notices concerning this application. File No.: L05P0019 -Martin Subdivision ( Please print ) Name: _________________________________ _ Address: ·--------------------------------- Telephone No.: ---------- King County has received an application to develop property at the address listed above. You are receiving this notice because our records indicate that you own property within approximately 500 feet of the proposal "' h 0 0 in 9> L I· . . . . ' .. . '-I '-~ I"' I _ . ,, '--.__; , ,1 ,!\ \,,·-., 1; 1 ._ , -<i· '1-•ll1 I / \ Ji I r ~· I\ i ·""'"-l_./ r-< \ \ ·ii' , ,_, -,_ , .< \ -,~ ., I --...c.:·: ---c-I ----~-,, .. _. 1 \, I\ }\ _ L.~i\\. r~_ :,, ---·~~~s\~~4'.4L"f;;;;/i:';\\ \\· .. :::::~ ----,---------. ----=:;,,;-. ... -~-,~ , rr-:;:-;-.,-1.~ . , ,c;, /,IC In , , , , , , . , c·--;-"::7-··---~'-, • ' ')1, / ' ' ! w---(' <1·· --',' ·---~-\ ', \):-+-'~ ,,_:, 1'',. -·--t-----r---, r . ' . . "·· · . · / ! i \c • j . 1 • \ '• .f•\ \ · • \ '[.\ \ \ d >i I I i ''' ''..---\-, ! 1: I \ '~ \ ,, I,, ~f-'l;r \df')_\1i\\. :J_ !_-+'\:~-:\~{~, -·,11 II II I .1 ! ' , . ' VJ 'q -I ' er, ' ' ' . , ' ' ' \'' ,_ I I . , · . . \ \ \i l !IJ \ -·1:o '' iT"'"~-t-\-.,ij; ·j ~-\ \···-\_';., ~\' 11 ; __ _J_-i--_L ____ I r ---~-\ ·, :. ~ __ :::,,___ P 11 \ \1\ i I -, \, -,_··,:,:i \ ·1 I ·1 ' '' '· ' ' "' ! ' . ; j : I ' ' '· I ' I , ____ ' ' '· ' 'i !IJ ( /' ~ \. _ ·----. ., ·,. '\ \ i :1_,1 . ... I ·---"I -I \/ \ ! __ :_ -i_ -·•·· ,}i\ n\ \ -,_, \ __ -·t:s:iii I I I · '--·-' -. :-~~--\ 1 -j: \, .::.\.., -..., ! '1 ' t, \ J\ -:/,/ ,1 :: ,,,_, ; \\,j':( t------·,-i--------i t '·.·_··\\_\ _ :_ : f-''.,. j'-,~ _;;; SE\1257-H-'ST;REE_!_l,_~i' __ .\\i_\'_·,,_',,),\l_'J I I I • • . ' ; I , I ' ' ~ / ' . . ·, ' ,. "; ' ' \ ', -, co I .,.,, ,· S£T RR I • ',:.: \\ 1~'R-o-woa!t(AnON \ ,-. ' I It za_'N,f .. ',~ '\l''-,\1, };t;:~--\ _,\ I~~-~~~"'-r-·---:-·--, I -, · •\;,d-x·so_'EAsatfflr-FOR t-\ ''·,. 1· 1',/ ·, '[ ';J:;~\--i<,\\\\ [ I I I ' • ,, ----J'vNGRESS'AND £GRESS~ '> J_ .. --I / '' ' ' '-·'L' , ___ \_~_.:,. ', '""L' J I I .. ,.f-~------·---l--,~-·-r '..._ --4-., · • --r-····-t--1-"·1 ~ \ , · -. ~--------'-:-::<i ·t f. c-\ .. :-;·;· " ,, -'f )#c.,,, "':;, --2 ·~ : , .--• ''- 1 ---zoil1: r------1 r · : , .. ,/ I ·-,~I ',_-------, ,. , , \ •,. , r '), · _ . NBB~~~ ,11100 .0. "£ R-4 I I I '· 'rs---.,-----. 'fl CTA ,, ' k '/ 2' 3i / Ji ' S, -__ ~ 120.03 ""'-• ~. ' '• uuil ' I \ / \ •IJ.Jd ' N SPA~ \.. K ' 1, i 1, j~ t_,_ .;,, ' ' IQB" \ ,__1 1' i ' 1-------L J L cn = , \ ri,f';, !Cl>: i.Jf-&_'.:.,2.· ·,, \ \--l-' It I 1 -,, , 6 \ \. 1 r 1,\ I --1 ----1 I rn ~U i!-A--1i' LI 11·~--' ' ' -s. '-. ,, ' , " c,_ . ' , -' '1 PW"'''vQCI'>\ jlJJ\~RACTB -'<, -> 6 '\_'(;. \. ::,-~-5 o\: 60 '14 ' ; 102·\ ~,. ___ ..='··-::_::_ __ J' 1 1 I I ! I .... ~ sHfMR . ',f.lo~NSPACfA,,' \' ,--:0·.,--R,OADA;';;; : .r.·R~,r.t0 ,, \ '· ~ ! ! ttt·. ------L ______ _j__~- 1 00 <:::slz -0 UC' ._ ~ ;~4,U SF ~ -.~~ . \'9 ' ,, 102 ·, .,> · .... , '\. 7 ·,~ "' ,, 1 -l""2 ~~ ...µ,...• -' ' ,. ~ ' •• ' ' • k \ . ,, -. ' 0 ' I R 4 ' " \ Cl.\ l ' R • \ " \ / J ' \ I, ~ 116'', -_ ,;; j .l I I.'! c:) r.:,-;:i '-,.......,._.,:-_ ----~ '·. \. ''-'-./I~-1'!'1Z.AND ~ i It) \ ' ' i~ /·"'"Cl AD· 4 ' '. !") f'O') I "' uuu . :x: ,_ '{, " <126 , .. ~, , , . "' I -, @ I " '· _; > ):"o .. ' '•,_ . '---. s, \ l.1-a----.--=--1 "'1 I ,, ""-J·;::.:::, > \. /""' > . I ?1' TRACT C :S :g /~ :,; loo· ', h, i I 1 / .. ~1.·.·:,··.!/ ~<b------\!<.Dl;~WN ·, 126-._,, ~ ' .\ ! I! -·I · · 1·) i ; 42 • i" ---.. ~\ i '-. ::i '-Jf.. \ .9 '~ l,,..1tf! I KING COUNTY t t9 • ,· • • • ,'; , ~ _ "'\\ ~~"'· ~ ~ 145·'., -''"'••· ---i~~ r=-..................... =---.... --r ---,-,-..__..,_'-:4, ~-:':.;:{ .... 1 ... --=.·/ ; _ 1---H _ :sows_.,.02 EXsmu-cnlRES'ro , .. _-------I CITY OF RENTON~ · , ·~·~ .--._/ i ,,------------~ '. I I I I .. 1__!£-REMOlpl TYP, , I I W'--"'··-------~,---· !L-·-------,.-----1 ,---1 -r' i L i, i , i I -~::J '\ (/ j I /\~_.r·J/l_r·J/ /1_:_.J/[_ r-1/ ~--_11 , ____ l 1 1 I ----------------~ . '-,--'--. j \ --, ' I _JRENTQN J..~MCTD I .. ·1 I, 1-- •'1 ___ ) -----~--~"""-----\·-1--,----·~----~----USEDRIVEWAY, I .. : ! Ill I t · · ,,-,, I , , n--;;, /0 --S£ ___, _ 1 1 , .,._ .-{'tJE 5TH ST_REET)i·! l.__ __; __ ~ --... ,.------~a, f'. l' I : I ! ~ ~ I ~ --~,i--;---r---·1 ~( .t ~, -; ) r -i rLAc -, ill I" i '-'1 , \I f _1 i r· J 4/ i --; __ ,.. so· QdAN r 1· · !--I "' R I Q ,_, ' ,_ ,,_, --_-_ -,',,1 ; , i r--=---t,ioi-I pl.A . I I'" I I ' :1,:' ;./ .... ,!L1E1'.I::.:~~l ·;/_,j. --!1.u 1 I I /.·.·.;· I ~I L-1: I ; ' ' t· Ii i -'i/1! ; I -,I ' 1.1J I · · ' I r-j 1---L--\J;:, 1)!; -. .( -12 , di ;· -:1 I::?:-! ;·A._ ·1 (. -I I I ,.~ I ' \ ',;I --~:l· ;/ . '/ 't, : ,'. . I ~ I . ' ' ' ''---. I ' ' • ' . I I .....,_ I '-·I: \ t 'I , ' ~ ,1! . -------1 -_ I / ' -, I. ' '/ I ---+-- I • .,,.. c 1 I : , -· ,., , • ,q: r-""j, • " , • _ 1------------r------r.~-1----1r;· ··>·: , __ ,/ ,-: I· . i ,_ 1 Cl), \· ·. ·. ·. ·'-... /, .... 1 --1 1 1 (tfl· '.,.':..:: • .-... -';:/ \ I; l~I ···.·.--... I I Nt/+.....:--=--,-----4 ·\~-~ ·~=-t· --) ., -i r---, S> i ;___·--:.. . . . . lJ: i ~ ·-'--_ ';_· ·. · ~ 1~!_._b;:_f)·:··+·-.. -··i--1-: i ' , ' . -~. SE CORNER. NE 1/4, SE 1/4, SE 1/4, SEC 10 -, CLAUSSEN, KIM PROGRAM MANAGER III MS: OAK -DE-OIOO DDES/ LUSD DINSMORE, LISA CURRENT PLANNING SUPERVISOR MS: OAK-DE-OIOO DDES / LUSD DYE, PETE SR. ENGINEER DDES/LUSD MS: OAK -DE-0100 GILLEN, NICK CRITICAL AREA WETLAND REVIEW MS: OAK-DE-OIOO DDES I LUSD HENOCH, LANNY PROJECT MANAGER II MS: OAK -DE-OIOO DDES I LUSD LANGLEY, KRIS TRAFFIC ENGINEER MS: OAK-DE-OIOO DDES I LUSD ROGERS, CAROL CURRENT PLANNING SECTION MS: OAK -DE-0100 DDES / LUSD SLATTEN SARA CAM WEST DEVELOPMENT 9720 NE 120TH PL, # IOO KIRKLAND WA 98034 TRIAD AS SOCIA TES 12112 I 15TH AVE NE KIRKLAND WA 98034 • L05POOI9 L05POOI9 L05P0019 L05POOI9 L05P0019 L05P0019 L05P0019 L05P0019 L05P0019 • WEST.LARRY CRITICAL AREA GEO REVIEW MS: OAK-DE-0100 DDES/LUSD L05POOI9 2739200020/L05P0019 · AMERICAN CLASSIC HOMES LLC 644 STRANDER BL #217 TUKWILA WA 98188 1023059355/L05P0019 BASIC SAFET 12601148TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 1123059124/L05P0019 BASIC VENTURES INC 18211 240TH AV SE MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 2739200090/L05P0019 BIELKA RONALD G 18419 SE 122ND ISSAQUAH WA 98027 5637200290/L05P0019 CHINN THURMAN & KRISTINA 414 LYONS AV NE RENTON WA 98059 PL50/L05P0019 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 3448730020/L05P0019 DO STEVEN+NAGATO TAMAKI 5317 NE 4TH CT RENTON WA 98059 5637200430/L05P0019 ELUOTI ROBERT & RUTH 413 LYONS AV NE RENTON WA 98059 2739200130/L05P0019 FISHER JOHN AND KATHRYN 12415 149TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 2739200120/L05P0019 FLATIUM PATRIOA LEE 12422 148TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 • 2739200010/L05P0019 AMERICAN CLASSIC HOMES LLC 644 STRANDER BL #217 TUKWILA WA 98188 1123059017/L05P0019 BASIC VENTURES INC 18211 240TH AV SE MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 1123059122/L05P0019 BENNICK DERIK+MOUY-LENG 454 NILE PL NE RENTON WA 98059 1023059069/L05P0019 CAIRNES CONSTRUCTION LLC 14845 SE 264TH ST KENT WA 98042 1123059120/L05P0019 CHROMY JONATHAN R 466 NILE PL NE RENTON WA 98059 1123059118/L05P0019 DAUM DERON E+SHANA L 459 NILE PL NE RENTON WA 98059 1023059316/L05P0019 EBBERT DAVID M 459 NILE AV NE RENTON WA 98059 1123059075/L05P0019 ENGH DALE+ENGH MARY E ROBINSON- 12250 148TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 5637200380/L05P0019 FITTON JAMES A 5522 NE 4TH CT RENTON WA 98059 UAC-FC/L05P0019 FOUR CREEKS UNINCORPORATED AREACOUNOL PO BOX 3501 RENTON WA 98056 • 1023059026/L05P0019 BASHARY SHAY 10025 SE 260TH ST KENT WA 98031 1123059123/L05P0019 BASIC VENTURES INC 18211 240TH AV SE MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 2739200080/L05P0019 BIELKA RONALD G 18419 SE 122ND ISSAQUAH WA 98027 5637200360/L05P0019 CHEUNG CHING BRIAN PAK+PUI SHUEN AMY 5606 NE 4TH CT RENTON WA 98059 PL33/L05P0019 CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 2739200071/L05P0019 DELANGE JOEL'. J 12438 148TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 5637200350/L05P0019 EGBEJIMBA JUDE E+ JOY I 5612 NE 4TH CT RENTON WA 98059 1023059193/L05P0019 ESQUEDA JUANITA+BARRERA JULIAN 421 NILE AV NE RENTON WA 98059 2739200050/L05P0019 FLATIUM PATRIOA LEE 12422 148TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 5637200390/LOSP0019 FRASER KEITH M+SUSAN E 5516 NE 4TH ST RENTON WA 98059 1023059341/LOSP0019 GILBERT KEITH C+CATHERINE C 12609 148TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 1023059170/LOSP0019 HODGE HAROLD D 19210 121ST PL SE RENTON WA 98055 5637200370/LOSP0019 JAUOAN JENNIFER+SIU GREGG 5600 NE 4TH CT RENTON WA 98059 2739200060/LOSP0019 LARSON JAMES M+GLORJA E 12430 148TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 1023059383/L05P0019 MARTIN KENNETH A 12439 148TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 1123059105/L05P0019 MEDONICH IVAN M+BLIKRE TERESA A 5707 NE 4TH PL RENTON WA 98059 1123059121/L05P0019 MOY JAMES THONG+BEATRJCE TANG 460 NILE PL NE RENTON WA 98059 2739200030/L05P0019 MUNRO RICHARD G+BARBARA C 12414 148TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 2739200190/L05P0019 ORENDORFF GABRIEL+RENNIE 12428 149TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 1023059219/L05P0019 PINCOMBE ROBERT S 451 NILE AV NE RENTON WA 98059 • 2739200170/L05P0019 HAMMOND JAMES C+ERIKA L 12414 149TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 3448730010/L05P0019 HUANG KUAN-MING+LI CHING HU 8102 118TH CT SE NEWCASTLE WA 98056 2316800150/L05P0019 KING COUNTY 600 KC ADMIN BLDG SEATTLE WA 98104 5637200330/L05P0019 LIU QING CHONG 5624 NE 4TH CT RENTON WA 98059 2739200160/L05P0019 MAZURKIEWICZ ERIC R 12406 149TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 1123059070/L05P0019 METCALF WILLIAM+BERNICE 12260 148TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 1123059021/L05P0019· MULLENBERG DEAN ]+CAROLYN L -TRUST 5816 NE 4TH PL RENTON WA 98059 5637200310/L05P0019 MURILLO OLIVER 5609 NE 4TH CT RENTON WA 98059 1023059206/L05P0019 PHO TRAN 5640 NE 4TH ST RENTON WA 98059 1023059320/L05P0019 REED LAWRENCE A 465 NILE AV NE RENTON WA 98055 • 1023059192/L05P0019 HOAGUE ROBERT L 431 NILE AV NE RENTON WA 98055 1023059174/L05P0019 HUNSAKER PATRICK 11335 DURLAND PL NE SEATTLE WA 98125 1023059038/L05P0019 KOCH JOHN E+PATRJOA D 12605 148TH AV SE RENTON WA 98056 3448730040/L05P0019 LUU KAREN K 459 KITSAP PL NE RENTON WA 98059 5637200300/L05P0019 MCGUIRE NATASHA 5603 NE 4TH ST RENTON WA 98059 5637200490/L05P0019 MORGAN PLACE HOA 9375 SW COMMERCE OR STE 7 WILSONVILLE RO 97070 2739200040/L05P0019 MUNRO RICHARD G 12414 148TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 1123059117/L05P0019 NGUYEN TUAN A 5706 NE 4TH PL RENTON WA 98059 1023059042/L05P0019 PHUNG AN 9333 57TH AV W MUKILTEO WA 98275 2316800130/LOSP0019 RENNE MARK+AUDREY 12338 149TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 2739200180/L05P0019 REPENN ROGER L 12422 149TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 5637200280/L05P0019 REVARD ABNEY 9375 SW COMMERCE OR STE 7 WILSONVILLE OR 97070 1123059093/L05P0019 SHAHNEWAZ KAZI 5702 NE 4TH PL RENTON WA 98059 1023059191/L05P0019 SHAMROCK HIGHLANDS LLC 9720 NE 120TH PL #100 KIRKLAND WA 98034 2739200200/L05P0019 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 12436 149TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 2739200100/L05P0019 SIKES DONALD K JR+ONDY I P 12435 149TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 CG2/L05P0019 SUSAN SULLIVAN 24311 SE 47TH ST ISSAQUAH WA 98029 5637200340/L05P0019 TOYOHARA scan 14023 SE 60TH ST BELLEVUE WA 98006 5637200400/L05P0019 WONG TERENCE K+JULIE Y CHEN 431 LYONS AV NE RENTON WA 98059 • 5637200410/L05P0019 REV ARD ABNEY 9375 SW COMMERCE CIR STE 7 WILSONVILLE OR 97070 1123059031/L05P0019 scan SHARON.ELIZABETH 12610 148TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 1023059415/L05P0019 SHAMROCK HIGHLANDS LLC 9720 NE 120TH PL #100 KIRKLAND WA 98034 1023059384/L05P0019 SHAMROCK HIGHLANDS LLC 9720 NE 120TH PL #100 KIRKLAND WA 98034 2739200210/L05P0019 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 12436 149TH AV SE RENTON WA 98056 SD8/L05P0019 STEVE CRAWFORD, NEW CONSTRUCTION ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT #411 565 NW HOLLY ST ISSAQUAH WA 98027 1123059015/L05P0019. TEA HUY 5701 NE 4TH PL RENTON WA 98059 3448730030/L05P0019 TRUONG TONY+WEN PAULINE 5323 NE 4TH CT RENTON WA 98059 3448730050/L05P0019 ZHANG XUAN+BRAVO SERGIO 421 KITSAP PL NE RENTON WA 98059 • 5637200420/L05P0019 REVARD ABNEY 9375 SW COMMERCE CIR STE 7 WILSONVILLE OR 97070 5637200320/L05P0019 SENG JOHNNY 5615 NE 4TH CT RENTON WA 98059 1023059031/L05P0019 SHAMROCK HIGHLANDS LLC 9720 NE 120TH PL #100 KIRKLAND WA 98034 1023059040/L05P0019 SHAMROCK HIGHLANDS LLC 9720 NE 120TH PL #100 KIRKLAND WA 98034 2739200110/L05P0019 SIKES DONALD K JR 12435 149TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 5637200440/L05P0019 STPETER MARK 407 LYONS AV NE RENTON WA 98059 3448710090/L05P0019 TOKER EREZ+NANCY A 5310 NE 4TH CT RENTON WA 98059 1123059119/L05P0019 TSANG SHEK CHUNG+SOK WAJ. LAU 467 NILE PL NE RENTON WA 98059 -----~--------- .:.,, . • • .. " (E Renton) FD25 (Spring Glen) FD40 Fire Protection Dist #25 Fire Protection Dist #40 P.O. Box 2925 10828 SE 176th St Renton WA 98056-0925 Renton WA 98055 MS: KSC-NR-0600 MS: KSC-TR-0431 KC27 Water & Land Res. Div Gary Kriedt King County Dept. of Natural Res. KC Metro Envirn. Planning Steve Foley LilS LI20 Fairwood Library Highlands Library 17009 -140th Av SE 2902 NE 12th St Renton WA 98058 Renton WA 98056 LI23 Documents Dept. Librarian LI24 Kent Regional Library King County Library System 212 --2nd Av N 960 Newport Way NW Kent WA 98032-4482 Issaquah, WA 98027 LI36 ATTN: Edward White PL18 Renton Library Kent Engineering Dept 100 Mill Av S 220 -4th Av S Renton WA 98055 Kent WA 98032 PL19 City of Renton PL33 Kent Planning Dept Economic Development Dept. 220 -4th Av S 1055 S. Grady Way Kent WA 98032 Renton WA 98055 Clinton G. Marsh, Director Fae. & Const. Dept SD9 R. Stracke, Facilities & Ping SD13 Kent School District # 415 Renton School Dist # 403 12033 SE 256th St. Bldg B 1220 N 4th St Kent WA 98031-6643 Renton WA 98055 Administrator SES Environmental Review Section ST2 Kent Sewer Utility WA State Dept of Ecology 220 -4th Av S PO Box 47703 Kent WA 98032 Olympia WA 98504-7703 Habitat Biologist, Rod Malcom TRl Russ Ladley, Fisheries Biologist TR2 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Puyallup Tribe 39015 -172nd Av SE 6824 Pioneer Wy E Auburn WA 98002 Puyallup WA 98371 TR3 Fisheries Habitat/Environment TRS Snoqualmie Tribe Suquamish Indian Tribe PO Box 280 PO Box 498 Carnation WA 98014-0280 Suquamish WA 98392 r A' 'lo. Richard Young Tulalip Tribe 7615 Totem Beach Rd Marysville WA 98271 Public Works Dtr Kent Water Dist 220 -4th Av 5 Kent WA 98032 Soos Creek Water/Sewer Dist PO Box 58039 Renton WA 98058-1039 Coal Creek Utility District 6801 132nd Place SE Newcastle, WA 98059 WA State Dept. of Wildlife 16018 Mill Creek Blvd. Mill Creek, WA 98012 WA State Dept. of Ecology ·--~w Regional Office 3190 -160th Ave SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 WA St. Ecology Dept/WQSW Unit Linda Matlock PO Box 47696 Olympia, WA 98504-7696 Eleanor Moon KC Executive Horse Council 12230 NE 61st Kirkland, WA 98033 • TR4 WD23 WD41 WD57 • Cedar River Water/Sewer Dist 18300 SE Lk Youngs Rd Renton WA 8058-9799 City of Renton, Public Works Dept. Development Services Div. 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Water Dist #90 15606 SE 128th St Renton WA 98059-8522 Water Dist #111 27224 -144th Av SE Kent WA 98042-9058 WA State Dept. of Wildlife Habitat Mgmt. Division P.O. Box 43155 Olympia, WA 98504-3155 WSDOT NW Region SnoKing Area MS-240 15700 Dayton Ave No. PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Roger Dorstad PO Box 375 Redmond, WA 98073 WD12 WD32 WD55 WD58 m'tw Seattlem'im~ ~~~ REPRESENTING THE .$eattleJoi;t-.3Jntelligenccr Re Advertiser Account #78871004 Ad TEXT:KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DOES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98057·5212 NOTICE OF PERMIT HEARING & RECOMMENDATION LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION REQUESTS: FORMAL (SUBDIVISION) FIie# & Name: LOSP0019 Martin Applicant: Camwest Real Estate Dev., Inc. Location: 120 west of 148th Ave SE, 100 south of SE 125th St, and 100 north of NE 5th St., Renton Proposal: Subdivide 3.71 acres Into 13 lots tor detached S/F dwellings Project Manager: Karen Scharer 206.296-7114 Hearing Date and Time: March 22, 2007 at 9:30 am Location of Public Hearing: DOES, Hearing Room 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98057-5212 Dep't. Recommendation to Hearing Examiner: Approve subject to conditions Comment Procedures: Comments on the above file are now being accepted by King County DOES, Land Use Services Division, at the address listed above Published this 31st day of January, 2007 Ad # 7350301 00 MAIN FILE COPY ' ' \ .. KC /DEV & ENVIRON «W Seattle «ttnt)S ~~ REPRESENTING THE Seattlelfost-Jntelligemer PO Box 70, Seattle, WA 98111 ATIN JACQUIE GONDOLA 900 OAKESDALE AVE SW RENTON, WA 98055 Re: Advertiser Account #78871004 Ad #: 735030100 3643633 / 3 STATE OF WASHINGTON Counties of King and Snohomish Affidavit of Publication l t1e undersigned, on oath states that he/she is an authorized representative of The Seattle Times Company, publisher of The Seattle Times and representing the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, separate newspapers of general circulation published daily in King and Snohomish Counties, State of Washington. The Seattle Times and the Seattle Post-Intelligencer have been approved as legal newspapers by orders of the Superior Court of King and Snohomish Counties. The notice, in the exact form annexed, was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper or papers and distributed to its subscribers during all of the said period. The Seattle Times The Seattle Post-Intelligencer --. --- 01/31/07 01/31/07 Agent C'Da ,r) ;, C . . ti: 1~:\:1-Signature C'C::o >, -'i ("u .1:\-t cd:b- STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Jody L. Barton, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on January 31, 2007. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$199.13. .~· .. \·· ~~-r:-:·ii..'4;..u~ -~ )Ad .. R . R R "\''II' ' ega vert1smg epresentat1ve, en ton eporter _.,. . . \ \ '. 11 • 1 , ! l lJ; ~'* • ·· · ,, D C · ', "I Subscribed and sworn to me this 3 I' day of Janua•:r,-2~.0,7.' ~ ••. ···-':;)/;·;,...,. ,- ,. ·, • · Gomrn18 ,, .• ~/ ·" \ / .... :. • ,·,~ •·10 •• 0 ,:;. '\II -• C'• -,· Iv, ') • ~ l b rp Co:2JLZ£~~ ~-.. · -';re;, ~y> ~ '· !' "' -2 0. -j D Cantelon ! ·? .. 7• ·:·,; 010 ~ : 2 Notary Public for the State of Washington, ResidiQ.g ifJ.l\erltf.:Washington, / r} S i · P O N b . '¥-. ~ ,... •• I·· .. , . r<\ o'. • ,.. r .. umer. ·,-!'\.. , ... Q_..· .... 11n.~.· .. , l .. "/ , y . .... '" ·\ ;,-/1:, i\.1b\\C ,,,,, .f •,,. •11111111\\•'\-.47 . '"":.'!.~,.."i....,.......~~ .. ·f-~~d":·~ KING COUNTY DEPJ: OF DEVEWPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DDESJ 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98057-5212 NOTICE OF PERMIT HEARING & RECOMMENDATION LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION Request: Fonnal (Subdivision) File# & Name: L05P0019 Martin Applicant: Camwest Real Estate Dev., Inc. L<x:ation: 120' west of 1·18th Ave SE, 100' south of SE 125th St, and 100' north of NE 5th St., Renton Proposal: Subdivide 3.71 acres into 13 lots for detached S/F dwellings Project. Manager. Karen Scharer 206.296-7114 Hearing Date and Time: March 2i, 2007 at 9:30 am Location of Public Hearing: ODES, Hearing Room 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98057-5212 Dept. Recommendation to Hearing Examiner: Approve subje<.t, to conditions. Comment Procedun>.s: Comments on the above file are now being accepted by King County ODES, Land Use Sciviccs Division, at the address listed above. Published in the Renton Reporter January 31, 2007. #862804 "' • • I • / Gcill,~y • • From: Goll, Shirley Sent: To: Subject: Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:28 AM 'legals.bellevue@kingcountyjournal.com'; 'legals@seattletimes.com' Legal ad for hearing request Thanks (Jody, the Renton Reporter? Let me know if they are up and running and if not Bellevue Reporter would be closest to the zip code 98059 of plat site) Please confirm receipt. Please publish legal notice in your newspaper on Wednesday, January 31, 2007, which will meet our minimum legal notice requirement. Should this not be possible, please fax or call me as soon as possible. · Please submit your invoice with 3 copies of the affidavit of publication to DDES Accounts Payable as soon after publication as possible, in order for us to enter legal proof of publication in our file records, and so that we may process same for payment. Attachment: Legal Notice KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DOES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98057-5212 NOTICE OF PERMIT HEARING & RECOMMENDATION LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION Request: Formal (Subdivision) File# & Name: L05P0019 Martin Applicant: Camwest Real Estate Dev., Inc. Location: 120' west of 1481• Ave SE, 100' south of SE 1251• St, and 100' north of NE s•• St., Renton Proposal: Subdivide 3. 71 acres into 13 lots for detached S/F dwellings Project Manager: Karen Scharer 206.296-7114 Hearing Date and Time: March 22, 2007 at 9:30 am Location of Public Hearing: DDES, Hearing Room 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98057-5212 Dept. Recommendation to Hearing Examiner: Approve subject to conditions. Comment Procedures: Comments on the above file are now being accepted by King County DDES, Land Use Services Division, at the address listed above. Published this 31" day of January, 2007 c.c. Accounts Payable/Admin. Services/ DDES Application File: L05P0019 S.Times Acct. No. 078871004 1 -,----. (® King County DOES Parcel Information Report -Change ReRort- This report was generated: 1/23/2007 2:20:56 PM Parcel Number: 1023059383 (eiihtlfl El Base Info Pa~el Number: 1023059383 Tax Payer: CAMWEST DEVELOPMENT INC Annexation: N/A Jurisdiction: King County Situs Address: 12439 148TH AVE SE Zip Code: 98059 Postal Cit')' El Reference Info Plat Name: N/A Plat Recording Date: N/A Plat Lot: N/A Plat Block: N/ A Kroll Page: 805 Thomas Brothers Page: 656 1/4-S-T-R: SE-10-23-5 Lot Area: 160,736 SqFt. (3.69 Acres) El Planning Info Zoning: R-4 Comprehensive Land Use: um Assessor's Open Space: N/A Commercial Use: N/A Number of Units: N/A -----~ Page I of2 • The information Included in this report has been compiled by King County s from a variety of sources and Is subject to change without notice. King Cou makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the accurc completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King Cou shall not be liable for any general, special, Indirect, incidental, or consequer damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resul\ from the use or misuse of the information contained in this report. Any salt this report or Information on this report is prohibited except by writ permission of King County. Appraised Land Value: 2005 -$415,000, 2006 -$429,000 Appraised Improvements Value: 2005 -$165,000, 2006 -$181,000 El Administrative District Info Community Plan Area: Newcastle Unincorporated Area Council: Four Creeks Unincorporated Area CounciiMA/N FILE copy School District: Issaquah School District 411 Fire District: 0025 Roads MPS Zone: 442 ($2,918) Roads Transportation Concurrency Mitigation Zone: 754 Waterfront: No Water System: WATER DISTRICT Water Service Planning Area: King County Water District 90 Sewer System: PRIVATE Airport Noise Remedy Program: N/A Bald Eagle Flag: N/ A Council District: 9 Reagan Dunn Drainage Basin: Lower Cedar River: WRIA 8 ' • ----------------------------------- Police Jurisdiction: King County Police Precinct: 3 Police District: F2 Snowload Zone: Standard Agricultural Production District: N Forest Production District: N Rural Forest Focus Area: N Transfer Development Rights Type: N/A Transfer Development Rights Status: N/A Transfer Development Rights Permit Number: N/A El Inspection Area Info Building Inspection Area: N-7 Clearing Inspection Area: Bruce Enge II Code Enforcement Inspection Area: Bill Turner ESA Inspection Area: Greg Sutton Grading Inspection Area: Bruce Enge II Land Use Inspection Area: Tim Cheatum El Sensitive/Critical Area Info Sensitive Areas Notice(s) on Title: None Sensitive Historic Site: None Aquatic Areas Buffer: N Basin Condition: Low Flow Control Area: Conservation Flow Water Quality: Basic Water Quality Treatment Critical Aquifer Recharge Area: None Area of Potential Wetland Influence: Y Page 2 of2 • -i ~·t'.jl lll ;;i . - .. - Page I of I • • Q UNiTE{)STLlTES POSTlll. SERVfCE, USPS Home I FAQs Find a City by ZIP Code™ Results You Gave Us 98059 Do Another Lookup . .. ............................ I .................... ______ ..... .. .. z:J~C:~~!-~~.."~~ ..! Cities in a ZIP Code may be referred to by more than one name or spelling. These results indicate the actual city name. as well as any acceptable alternatives. Actual City name in 98059 RENTON, WA Acceptable City names in 98059 NEWCASTLE. WA Related Links Calculate Postage Calculate postage for your letter or package online! 13!!1~..C.l!lculator Print Shipping Labels Print shipping labels from your desktop and pay online. C.lick-N-Ship® Other Postag~ Business or Residence Lookup :fellow Pages Find a business nationwide. White Pa.9es Find a residence nationwide. po1w;,,·f.l\i ,e,y Switchboard National & ~mi.er Accounts Copyright© 1999-2005 USPS. A!I Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy NoFEAR Act EEO Data A Postal Inspectors W PresecvJngJhe_TJ.Yfil ~ !nspector General ~ Eroroo!ing lntegrl.ty •• • • Page I of2 Goll, Shirley From: Jody Barton [jody.barton@kingcountyjournal.com) Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 1 :24 PM To: Goll, Shirley Subject: RE: Legal ad for hearing request Good Afternoon Shirley! I have received your email with the attachment and will publish the notice (re: File# L05P0019) in the Wednesday, January 31, 2007 edition of the Renton Reporter. Thank you! Jody Jody Barton Legal Advertising Representative King County Publications, Ltd. 600 Washington Ave. S. PO Box 130 Kent, WA 98035 253-234-3506 (Phone) 253-859-9737 (Fax) "We come to love not by finding a perfect person, but by learning to see an imperfect person perfectly." -----Original Message----- From: Goll,Shirley[mailto:Shirley.Goll@METROKC.GOV] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 11 :28 AM To: legals.bellevue@kingcountyjoumal.com; legals@seattletimes.com Subject: Legal ad for hearing request Thanks (Jody, the Renton Reporter? Let me know if they are up and running and if not Bellevue Reporter would be closest to the zip code 98059 of plat site) Please confirm receipt. Please publish legal notice in your newspaper on Wednesday, January 31, 2007, which will meet our minimum legal notice requirement. Should this not be possible, please fax or call me as soon as possible. Please submit your invoice with 3 copies of the affidavit of publication to ODES Accounts Payable as soon after publication as possible, in order for us to enter legal proof of publication in our file records, and so that we may process same for payment. Attachment: Legal Notice KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (ODES) 01/25/2007 • • 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98057-5212 NOTICE OF PERMIT HEARING I!. RECOMMENDATION LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION Request: File# & Name: Formal (Subdivision) L05P0019 Martin Applicant: Camwest Real Estate Dev., Inc. • Page 2 of2 Location: 120' west of 1481h Ave SE, 100' south of SE 125th St, and 100' north of NE 5th St., Renton Proposal: Subdivide 3. 71 acres into 13 lots for detached S/F dwellings Project Manager: Karen Scharer 206.296-7114 Hearing Date and Time: March 22, 2007 at 9:30 am Location of Public Hearing: ODES, Hearing Room 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98057-5212 Dept. Recommendation to Hearing Examiner: Approve subject to conditions. Comment Procedures: Comments on the above file are now being accepted by King County ODES, Land Use Services Division, at the address listed above. Published this 31 61 day of January, 2007 c.c. Accounts Payable/Admin. Services/ ODES Application File: L05P0019 S.Times Acct. No. 078871004 01/25/2007 ~otice of: ® • Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 SEP"'A Threshold Determination, Plat Recommendation & Plat Hearing File#: L05P0019 Project Name: Martin (Type 3) Applicant: . Camwest Real Estate Development, Inc. 9720 NE 1201h Place, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 Contact: Sara Slatten Phone# 425-825-1955 DOES Project Manager: Karen Scharer, Project/Program Manager II Phone# 206-296-7114 Email: karen.scharer@metrokc.gov Project Location: 120 feet west of 1481h Ave SE, 100 ft south of SE 1251h St., & 100 ft north of NE 5th St. (Renton). STR 10-23-05 Parcel# 1023059383 Project Description: A request for a subdivision of 3.71 acres into 13 lots for detached single-family dwellings. The density is 3.5 dwelling units per acre. The lot sizes are mostly 6,700 -7,600 square feet.) Permits Requested: Formal Subdivision Department Recommendation to the Hearing Examiner: Approve, subject to conditions SEPA Threshold DeterminaUon: Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Issued: January 26, 2007 Date of Public Hearing: March 22,.2007 at 9:30 AM DOES Hearing Room -firstfloor 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98057-521.2 Please Note that two other plats in the neighborhood will be considered on this same day and time (Filest02P0005 and L03P0018). The Department of Development and Environmental Services_ (DDES) will issue a written report and recommendation to the Hearing Examiner two weeks prior to the scheduled public hearing. Persons wishing to receive a copy of the report should contact DDES at the address listed below. Following the close of the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner will issue a written decision which may be appealed to the Metropolitan-King County Council. Appeal procedures will be stated in the Examiner's written decision. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact the Project Manager at the phone number listed above. Written comments may also be submitted to DDES. A public hearing as required by law will be held to consider the approval of this application. If the Renton School District announces a district-wide school closure due to adverse weather conditions or similar area emergency, the public hearing on this matter will be postponed. Interested parties will be notified of the time and date of the rescheduled hearing. Any questions regarding postponements and rescheduling can be directed to the Hearing Examiner's Office at (206) 296-4660. Comment/Appeal Pro.cedure on SEPA Threshold Determination: Comments on this SEPA determination are welcome. This SEPA determination may also be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner. A notice of appeal must be filed with the Land Use Services Division at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on February 20, 2007, and be accompanied with a filing fee of $250.00 payable to the King County Office of Finance. If a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall also file a Statement of Appeal with the Land Use Services Division at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on February 20, 2007. The Statement of Appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including the file number) and the alleged errors in that decision. Further, the Statement of Appeal shall state: 1) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the Statement of Appeal. Failure to timely file a Notice of Appeal, appeal fee or Statement of Appeal, deprive·s the Hearing Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Appeals must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) at the following address: DDES--Land Use Services Division Attn: Permit Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 Date of Mailing: January 26, 2007 If you have any questions regarding the appeal procedures, please contact the Planner at the phone number listed above. If you require this material in Braille, audio cassette, or large print, call (206) 296-6600 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (TTY). You are receiving this notice because our records indicate that you own property within approximately rt~ because you requested to receive notice of the decision. ~ 0: w "' ,: ::, z w ..J LI. w Cl 0 u 0 w <.') "' w cc :c ::, z f-u w - ® King County Departrri:ent of Development and Environmental Services 900 0.-ih.esdrdc Al't'nue S0uti1west Ren 1011, \\'A 9B055~1219 MEMORANDUM FROM: Site Investigator . 'P;iETH CH_ ES 1-t I ER TO: Engineer _ 'P E'TE DYE ( Ll-f EN J . RE: Field Check Observations I, PROJECT NUMBER/ NAME L05POOl9 / MAR.TIN Address/Location !2~39 IYBJJ:t A\JE 5£ Date l \ · 3 · 5 FlEL-D .\e' 11 · 7.· 5 Related Project# I Name~A~o~S~P~t:1~2.~(o=O-----------·----- Thomas Map Page (new) (o 5(o J \ Thomas Guide Page {old) _______ _ 1. SYNOPSIS OF PROPOSAL SVBD1VLDE. 3.loCl Ac.RES OF R-Y I l\-l1'D IY LOTS WA-:1:ER QVALI I':( L\-1:D~·--· BASIC. ¢ Exhibit Na \ '1 Item No. L.~SpC~\':\ Received :S ·Z.'<..-S:S± Kiug Couuty HeariRQ Exa1+1iner FLoW CONTROL CONSER\IA:D..O~N~--~~- 3. SIERRA FILE INFORMATION Parcel#(s) 102305 9'.:28'3 Kroll Map Z:05 E Acres I Feet' 3. CoC\ A * Community Plan NEW CA '.STLE S-T-R S£:: I0,'23·0S Current Zoning_~f<~--L\+----- o Comprehensive Plan _U~f'Y\~----· "' ._ Limited Text Entry NO P-Suf FIX COl',..ID(f)O'J S FOU"-1~ PAGE J 4, SENSITIVE AREAS INFORMATION MAP FOLIO PAGE# SIJECONTAfNS SITE ABUTS YES NO YES NO COMMENTS • Wetlands ___ [2) 0 D [2J Wetland# _____ Wetland Class ---~Drainage Basin -------- Sub Basin LOWER CEDAR "\?1\/EJ< Critical Basin? IT] 0 • Streams ______ o IZl D [2J Stream Class -----Stream Name ---------------- • I 00-year Floodplain _0 [21 ___ 0 [ZJ • Erosion Hazard __ 0 I] _____ 0 0 • Landslide Hazard _0 I] __ 0 0 • Seismic Hazard _____ 0 [ZJ __ 0 C2l • Coal Mine Hazard ..... 0 [21 ____ 0 [2l • Other known SA's _o D _o D Class I or 2 Stream or Class I Wetland within one mile downstream of project site? ------ FEMA FIRM number -________________ In FEMA Floodplain? IT) 0 Soils Mapped · ' A;8. A :3k Map# -l.,.l:-'...,_2 ___ _ Best available Topographical Map VSfu S ,# 2 S S , SITE DES CR 1-P TIO N MATCHES T.I.R. DESCRIPTION/ THE SIT£ IS A Ri;c.TA:NbUL/sJ<. 0ttls:PEI) PAi<CEL WlJJ:\ A SMA\...L STI?--1P o'2 "PtsN ttANDLE'' S)CfEN:DlNq ovr "IQ IJ:l £ EAST Tl\:82.£ i S "A:N \?')(\ STI N fu t-tDust;; AND BMN /our&21LQ1t,..163 $,ffOU/\..JOBD BY A-Cl]',JG P6Sf\!f?E ' (MosrL1'. 6ot-'(1'S) w r:ru SENEZAL ~s ::IJ2.E1:;::S AND C-(q)SS :::n-± C: Sn:£:~ s OrY) v:: c..ct--07\1 "-1. 11':X-:i BC2ustt/A-LDGl2. , A SHALL W\2Jl.A:ND MDs IS 10E1Stnn1w DIV nt(Z :Srrr t'.)/:\9 .. MvcH OF ::;o:±1.S A:PPQ\Q...";, '17) l11svE, '.BF&Ll T)(swe-B,Bq/be.(Np:) ED BY C00$f©,)cSD,Ot,,J OF &-N A:D/ArtRSr '.PL.AI --n-t£ Q.ruAitJD82'.-ts , N '11-\-S ~A'$DJg£ f\:0Q Is e,,,UYlr20JU;( A-:~ BY A b eAvB\ , J2Dffi'.J wae:n-t 6f: THE Si%. PAGE 1 ~---------------------- 6. EXISTING SITE FEATURES Unmapped Sensitive Areas: -~N=Oh'-"',...) .,.E;"-'S...,_._£BN.._,_.-,'--'--"'---------------- Soils types seen and evidence of soil movement, slides, slumps, erosion, or deposition: ------ \00 SOIL MQ/eJ:::11::;;l)T SE8N Existing Utilities (hydrants, signs, poles, etc.) shown on site plan/_Y~~,,,_S«---------- Wildlife and habitats: _......_'-"-'-'-'-=S"---------------------- Water Wells: NDJE S£BN · Q/JCBUILDilX:':j':;, DQSI~ Work started on site? -WO, $1,£.RDUt:,.)D@ BY 51:t2ct::1gcc(. LD-1'$IJ2,L'C-'l}Qt0. Closed depression >SOOO_feet 21 IIJ @ Steep slopes? IIJ ®------------- 7.-DRAINAGE Drainage complaint records '.::>EE AJThq-J:8) 6l'S -60~S ! tv}D g13..JTZ)lsj Proposal will add >5000fc1 of new impervious surface? [I] [ID Approximate Area ______ _ Proposal will collect and concentrate surface and storm water runoff from an upland and site drainage area of over 5000 fc11 IYl [ID Approximate Area ______ _ Upl~nd Draina~e Basin (draining directly onto site): 3 PA l<ce1..S {;:-l A-Cei;) F LOU) 00T]) -tH E 'SI~ A:2.d-'\ -n, ,;:-@ sr. On-site Drainage: SLOPE 'S f\1-..1 D DI 'Tl.--H-ES DQ.AJ N I1±S Si;{}-;: ::IO Jl:t E: W \?'St BQLN D/\::(2):( I .d f::.l.E ( l N CL.uDI Ll6 6 Downstream Drainage (minimum I /4 mile distance): ::tJ-\: E sn-::s -D\21<;) b)S J:P ( ® ie COr0-STt2D ) AND PLawS , um 'IJ:\:E De:I:'8NT\Ot,,) f"Act ~tr FDR 8t?rHQQC~. 'D±E 'Dt:::T poµD o~s :saJD:\ uµDE12, SE 125TH ST 'II2 A P tli-:H '.P£1:b l'->D /><.-?>F l®U.SV::: , t bITD A :St~ ~~ D(2.l'n~ bVlkt \JJ~~ r£; PLA-r OF ' :5CUJ:t:: 0£ -TI:+ i::::: t\D,..)s.B:. :IliA"r:: Is N~L> <rD Bl? utypee__ D@/wl-QP lef1::tl27\...5L. f'.12:ot:'.I ~ 11-\:~ QO-b) t-..J /><0,t;z;: fl.o,.pS Sol)!J-\: :::r:tj]2-ow ft N 1?W 82., CY['{ 0~ (2..~ \::>l2-ru\2L-'i'::. AS O ~1,&ro IU 'f"l-1 t. 11 e.,. Drainage Description Matches T.I.R.?___i.,'!9C:,.----~----~-------- PAGE 3 r 8. EXISTING ROAO NETWORK On-site Roads __ p=:\2:.c)\J=B-0=,_/rY..L...J. __ .c._ _______________ _ Adjacent Roads 6f?A':-/EL \<.D'R) /\\...QNb NOl2JJ-1 S\DE -.QDM):S fQQ St::tAv\(<CC\(. \~ (W..r;;A,, WOT Bull-I uPID Sr:f:B:. 'j2QA;:O l55UE:;, ON SM::Mt<OQ:'.d t-.JQ'\ @.l:::SDL,V@ Closest Transit Stop ---'---------------------- 8. ESTIMATE OF PR.OJ EC T IMPACTS ON SO IL AND WATER 9. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS PAGE 4 10 CONSTRUCTION SIGNS WITHIN 500 FEET AND ADJACENT USE 11 NUMBER OF PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN PAGE. S ATTACHMENT TO MEMORANDUM PROJECT NUMBER: FIELD/OFFICE SKETCH WORK: Drainage systems, features, channels within the upland site plan areas, on the development site, and in the downstream receiving areas: SKETCHED BY: SC ALE Notes:-----------------------------I"=---- 0 PAGE 6 Tuesday, Nov 01, 2005 02:22 PM r Tuesday, Nov 01, 2005 02:23 PM Tuesday, Nov 01, 2005 02:23 PM Parcel Number: 1023059383 Taxpayer: MARTIN KENNETH A Annexation: N/A Jurisdiction: Unincorporated King County Situs Address: 12439 148TH AVE SE Postal City: Renton, 98059 Plat Name: ; Rec: nil Lot: N/A; Block: N/A Kroll Page: 805 E Thomas Bros. Page: 656 1/4-S-T-R: SE-10-23-5 Acres: 3.69 (160736 SqFt.) Current Zoning: R-4 Potential Zoning: Comp. Plan Land Use: um Assessor's Open Space: N/A Commercial Use: NIA Number of Units: N/A Mobile Home: N Appraised Land Value: 140000 (2004), 415000 (2005) Appraised Improvements Value: 217000 (2004), 165000 (2005) Community Plan Area: Newcastle Unincorporated Area Council: Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council School District: Issaquah School District 411 Fire District: 0025 Roads MPS Zone: 442 ($2918.00) · Roads TCM Zone: 754 Waterfront: Water Service: Water Service Planning Area: King County Water District 90 Sewer Service: Airport Noise Remedy Program: NIA Bald Eagle Flag: NIA Council District (1996-2001): 12 David Irons Jr. (R) Council District (2002): 12 David Irons Drainage Basin: Lower Cedar River, WRIA 8 Police: King County, Pct: 3, Dist: F2 Service/Finance Strategy Area: Service Planning Snowload Zone: Standard Agricultural Production District: N Forest Production District N Rural Forest Focus Area: N TOR Type: N/A TDR Status: NIA TDR Permit Number: NIA Building Inspection Area: N-7 Clearing Inspection Area: Bruce Engell Code Enforcement Inspection Area: Bill Turner ESA Inspection Area: Greg Sutton Grading Inspection Area: Bruce Engell Land Use Inspection Area: Tim Cheatum Sens. Areas Notice(s) on Title: NONE Aquatic Areas Buffer: N Basin Condition: Low Flow Control Area: Conservation Flow Water Quality: Basic Critical Aquifer Recharge Area: None Area of Potential Wetland Influence: Y soc ;comments Ai¥113,M By law this information may not be used for commercial purposes. Parcel Number 1023059383 -···---------··-·--·-- Account Number 102305938304 Taxpayer MARTIN KENNETH A Tax Year 2004 Tax Status TAXABLE Appraised Land Value Appraised Improvement Value Levy Code 6867 -·-.. -_.,______ -·------------... --·--·· .. .•. ---~ -------·----·-· ·--.•. Taxable Value Reason $140,000 Taxable Land Value NONE OR UNKNOWN $140,000 $217,000 Taxable Improvement Value $217,000 Parcel Number 1023059383 Taxpayer MARTIN KENNETH A --------·--------- Account Number 102305938304 ·------------- Tax Yea:.._ __ ~05 ·---·-·---Levy Code __________ ..• ~867 __ _ NONE OR Tax Status TAXABLE Taxable Value Reason · UNKNOWN Appraised Land Value $415,000 Taxable Land Value $415,000 Appraised Improvement $165,000 Taxable Improvement Value $165,000 Value Assessor Property Sales Records: Tip: Use the Recorders Office: Excise Tax Affidavits Report to see more sales records details Sale Date 3/7/1986 lsale Price l$0 Seller Name MARTIN KENNETH A $ER Buyer Name MARTIN KENNETH A Assessor Parcel Records: District Name KING COUNTY Property Name Property RESIDENTIAL Type Present Single Family Plat Name Use (Res Use/Zone) Plat Block Water WATER System DISTRICT Plat Lot Sewer PRIVATE System Lot Area 160,736 SqFt (3.69 acres) Access PUBLIC SectionfTownship/Range SE 10 23 5 Street PAVED Surface Page I of3 soc Account Number Assessor Legal Description Records: 102305938304 Record Number 01 Legal Description 102305 383 S 1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 LESS N 16 FT LESS E 150 FT LY S OF N 14 FT THOF LESS CO RD Assessor Residential Building Records: Address 12439 148TH AV SE 98059 . Building Grade Average Building number 1 Condition Good Bedrooms 3 Year Built 1969 Baths 2 Year Renovated 0 1/2 Baths 1 Total Living SqFt 2360 3/4 Baths 0 1st Floor Sq Ft 2360 Stories 1 Half Floor Sq Ft 0 Single Story Fireplace 1 2nd Floor Sq Ft 0 Multi Story Fireplace 0 Upper Floor SqFt 0 Free Standing 0 Fireplace Total Basement SqFt 0 Basement Garage SqFt 0 Total Finished Basement 0 Attached Garage SqFt 440 SqFt Finished Basement Grade NONE OR Open Porch SqFt 0 UNKNOWN Daylight Basement Enclosed Porch SqFt 0 Heat System Elec BB Deck SqFt 0 Heat Source Electricity Percent Brick Stone 0 This repo~ was generated: 7/30/2005 10:13:59 AM Related on-line re orts: [!sing .. countyGIS: .. erru>_ru:ty_information .. FAQ _ ··---·············------··········-·-···-·········-J jKLog County Assessor: SJiJ>mit a reg~to_f;_Q[!JlCt this information --=i [.DDES:_ Permit. Ai:,i:,lications_ Rep..m:t_____ _ ···-··-·· -----· . -·-······· J [t<i~~ ¢?~~ix ... ~i~tii~t~ ~~~ ~eye,;;~,,;~~! c~~~1fi;;~~••Rep?r1······.·······••··.····.·•·••·••······-·········• .· .... •1 I . . ·. .. .. .. ··· .......... ·· ................. · .... ·.····· -·· ··-···-·· ... -···-·-····-······· ·-····· ...... -. ·······--·-···-·-· -··· ·············.····-··············· ..... -.· .·· .. ·1 King County Assessor: eReal Proi:,erty Report (PDF format requires Acrobat) [!Qml County Treasury_QQerations:_P;o~ Tax Information--··----···--·---] rc-· ····· -. --··········-····-·--·· ·-··-----·· ... ··-· ... -. ···-········· . . ···-· ····--··--·-·········-···-········-··-··· -·· ·-·. -] Recorders Office: Excise_Tax Affidavits Report 1 ...................... · .•.•..... ·•............ .... •• • . . ......•. •................ .. .. . . •. • • • . .. . .• . • •...... .•. .· . •. -.. . jRecorders Office: Sc_!!.!ID.!1.~n..Qf.P@l§. surveys. and other map documents J ···---·-···-··-·--·----·-··---··---·--··-···-·-·-·-··-·-·----·--·-·-·-·-· ·-·--·-··---·-·-·--·-·--·-·------·--·-·------·---·-·---·-·---·--·--·-·-·--·-·--·-·----·----·----·--···--·---··--·--···-·-·--·---- Enter a 10 digit Parcel Number: 1 ..................... -·-··········· or Enter an address: I.·····-······-····-·-·-··-··-········-·····-·····--· ·-··· .... ··········-··· Page 2 of3 ' soc Page 3 of3 King County I GIS Center I News I Services I Comments I Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, ·you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The O~tfil[s.., soc Page I of I (®) King County a:.nmmJIII IEl!!!!III C19fd3#M Comments,, Mi¥ik4,M No P-Suffix Conditions Found The Parcel Number you entered "1023059383" does not have any Development Conditions. To starl over click on the New Query link below. Updated: December 29, 1998 King County I DOES Pag~ I DDES/GIS Page I New Query I News I Services I Comments I Search Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details, t; t; t; i!: ~ !!: ~ 115 AV ! 39H -3~8 -l•.J~ a ·03 9NDI ... "'• i!: R: "' I ONll t;;, ~ ----H-;-- IISAY -'11 a ~ " ( I 1 "':'"'I 0 0 ,- N (3) 1.3,~ @ 77600 4 r~L I 937.21 ·661.42 (2) PA 129.Uo 1293.48 1237.27 1292 .84 I ATI I AC 3SS.2.1 r I I 100 g ,.., .Z{" L .II<, .£fl "l,v CC'ATTI C' I I •• • • • • = • • • • • II •a II II • JI• II • II ---J • • • • • ' • ~ . ~. ••• :\gC ..... ~ • • • • • ·~· ·~ .. AgC • • •• • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • •• •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • ===== • • • • •••••• •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• ·-• • • • • • • • • fjt,4 . • ~1 5 • •• • • • AgB • • ~--• • • • • • • • I I I I I •• • • ••••• I • • • ••• r:-, • • • • • • I • • • I • I • I ---=----: I I I I I I I I I I • •• • • •• • • • • • • AgC ? 1 680 000 FEET 1 • • •• • ii • II • • II • II II // // I/ • ~ • AgC • • • • • • • • • • E • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . •, • • • • • • • •• • • • I • • • • • • • • • • • • I • • -• • • • • • • • ·-• • • • 14 ...... ==== • ,,. .. ,, . \\ ••• • II • • -• II • • • • II • • • ·-·11 • 111 • • • • • • •· • ••• .-. ·'"" • • J • • • • • ·-----• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ,... ·l~Apollo I• ... ·Sch • • • • • • • 1 1 • • A05PM260 2002 PHOTO S-T-R ,\ /QSUNES ~SECUNES N lWPlJNES N S118* Aerlal PtlOloa • 2002 Ncay.....-. Cll8I 0 100 1-.2001eet 200 Feel ®King COUnty ·r.s.. '_";;.;, ,J~·~-... ~=::=.ii:::.:.=.i: -..--l<lngO>uny-no '9PfWWW ... wor....,,...._ eacpw:01 ........... • ID ltw _,.;y,-.,,...._-or,tg11110,lhe-d --l<lngQufy-nollll-lor""I!' ------.or--Olffll9llird.drW. tu nae *llld ID, loll tw1rUe or loll: ..-~-lhe-or-dlhe-i"A ti~°" .. ._. Nff.-ot .. ffllPorHarmldDn ...... -.. ..--by-~d ,.___ Qufy F'lol date: Jul 30, 2005; l\ddel001"'°1'GIS\8Y_~~ ! •• • I j J alt I ll s L i'i}il t en ji@ a z" ~ J I 111Js pff 0--' I ,l1tiff ·u. , co <( ; ; ~ I J ~ ~ N-s n,1 h:t i ~ 0:: ® ti1 ·f 'tp,1 I a_W sijlllla! ~ LO I-~:~:~<< < 1 ( 1~1~·tiii C 0 a:: <t: <( 0 &d d tu~ !ii ·+ ::i I ' ;e 0 ol-coO NI ~a. a_N LOo Oo <(N 1 0 i ow ! i I H j I J <0C> ~ N-. § ~o 11 ,n mud V 5 Ith ! a. a:: § LO Cl 1 Ii ilmk~ij.,mumpmsw~ o>- <(I D~;~~< t~<;:9&1 111 ~[] Or I EJJ<~D 0 A05PM260 LIDAR T~~ 5 N 10 BaldEagle- WUfe- CJBaolns $-HI ,, 'QSUNES ~SEOJNES 7'/TWPUNES N Snels ,~ ~u3 ',, ~SA0Welland(19ll8) IZI SAO Landlllde BB SAO C<l8I Mine [:9SAOSe111111c: E3 SAO ErGelor1 ... WJtel Bodle8 CJ WlRO Drainage~ L Paroels ~ Partels ~faiil" Habllal WDFW2 OR TREES1 WDFW2 OR TREES3 TREES2 N Clly llcJlmariel NFB.1A erou Sec:tlone • Fe.IA Aoodway CJ Fe.IA 10Q.yr. ~ Cl1les 0 .500 1000 1500 Feel 1"• 1333 feel ®King COunty l(rg °""'ICY-"-ovarlolyd-end lo a.t,joa., ~ ,..,,.--........ --...-111' A =::,::._c:::..~.._ • ., .. ocaney.~ -o,ligl*k> ..... ol --~Cowily-nol .. -lorq ~_...--··"'---.._"""*0-lunol-... loll-o,loll irdb~fnlfflh_or_dlho_,,_ r!i-~"'1 ==-..;".':.:.l:::::...~,:,-· Oolny. 1·-~~-------~-----···-~~~--~--~~~-~ ~ ..... ______ -------, N ~ONSl;RV TION ~-....___1. ___ -___ f I FLOW ;C ~ '.'.""": --:-i-:- A05PM260 2005 SWDM S-T-R •\, QSUNES ~SEO.INES N T'NP..J~ N ~ c.. 0 400 Feet 1-.50019a1 ®King County Tho __ .... _ ... __ Oy l<ilV Col.riy_._. •oriolyd-and lo ujact .. c:t-.-. nallco. Kir'4100unly-no __,_., __ ., ............... -............. -«rfill*IO .. _d --l<ltvODunlr-... tao-lor.., r:::..c...~.:..::=:., .... ..-.-... ...... _"'_., .. __ -CIIINomop. ,.,.,,_., .. _or __ ClftlNa-•..--"I'-....-"' Oouriy. l'lol dlle: Jul 30, 2005; l'dcll8001\Jc01'glslav_~lbase2.apr j I I I I I J I I II J-.11 z 1 l ! ,, :lf !r I !! -1ieJ~I l,~t 0 I -' ]1 i 111·h'~·11 ~ p I' (0 '~xlpJih!' I N l 1f t ;•1 ~ 1 ,,; 1i11 J I j·'l11~l. i a..o @ i~~ '-11f - ~<( i~itll1 !~ 1 !! rN~ hibl•1ft; I <( CJ ~d d tu~ Ii! ~ I l i k ~= I _;; L.;_ '"' .. e I w I I ; I --.-. _.........,._,,._=,-~~ ;~-----. - ~-?: APoLa.o I ELEMENT~lftY _ I · I .g; ]2QJtt ST ~ 1 ~ : II.I -~----::>-! ,2(1 ~L------------..cl.- ~~-.... fie(~~£: >-_. -< .... 0 Q.; Q. ~ g i ~- 61 ~ i ·~n.n. . -~~ii ~1-+-.1 -f Fl ~i-.-il:.:! -. i ~ .1'§ J RA;.5 ~~ .I . : I I A05PM260 ZONING NT'* a Sa,oolslSchool FadlitiM &T-R ,, 'CISUN6S ~SEO.JNES '1'1i/TWPt.INES N Stt-. Wa1Br Bodies Rcad~-Way Parcels 0Paf1cs Cllles ZOnrcl 1'r10-~. ooeoupar1oacres 1'r35 -~. ooe OU per 36acres -F-Fa.i -M--. AA-2.5. Rural Na. ooe OU per 5 acres AA-5 -Rural Area, ooe OU per 5 acree • AA-10-Rural,..., ooe OU per 10 acres ~ . titian ReNrYe. ooe OU per 5 acres R-1 -Relldlntial , ooe OU per acre R"4 -RellOlntial, 4 OU per acre R.-e -ReliClanlal , 8 OU per acre R-8 • Rlllidentlal , 8 OU per acre R-12 • Rellclenlial, 12 OU per acre R-18 • Relidenllal, 18 DU per ma -R-24 • Relldenlial, 24 DU per acre -R"48 • Relldenllal, 48 OU per aae _ NB -Nt!Uibohtc.d ~ -CB. Comnu,ily 8uair*8 -RB. Reglor8 S..U- -0-0fflce 1-1~ N a.y BcundlWles 0 500 1000 1500 Feel 1"" 1333 feet ®King County ~ l~'=::«r:::i:.:=.i:::'.: ~--· l(lng°""'Y-no --.. ... --... lqlild.•IDh -·--... .,,. .... _,,, --l(lngClourty-ootbo-tor-, _.._....--.... ~ ...._inducio'G,tunol-...... -...... ~_...,.. ...... _ ... _,,, .. _ _ on._....,. Mf-olthlom,p,..- on"*m,p•~-.by-~ol Cl>uNy. Plol dale: Jul 30, 2005; llodea001ll<01'vlslav_~lbase2.apr L05P0019 001 .jpg L05P0019 002.jpg L05P0019 003.Jpg L05P0019 004.jpg L05P0019 005.Jpg L05P0019 006 .jpg L05P00 19 007.jpg L05P0019 008.jpg L05P0019 009.Jpg L05P0019 010.jpg L05P0019 011 .jpg L05P0019 012 .jpg L05P0019 013 .jpg L05P0019 014 .jpg L05P0019 015.jpg L05P0019 016.jpg L05P0019 017 .jpg L05P0019 018.jpg L05P0019 019 .jpg L05P0019 020 .jpg L05P0019 021 .jpg L05P0019 022 .jpg L05P0019 023.jpg L05P0019 024.jpg L05P0019 025.jpg L05P0019 028 .jpg L05P0019 027.jpg L05P0019 028.jpg L05P0019 029.jpg L05P0019 030.jpg L05P0019 031 .jpg L05P0019 032.jpg L05P0019 033.jpg L05P0019 034.jpg L05P0019 035.jpg L05P0019 036.jpg L05P0019 037.jpg L05P0019 038.jpg L05P0019 039.jpg L05P0019 040.jpg L05P0019 041 .jpg L05P0019 042 .jpg L05P0019 043.jpg L05P0019 044.jpg L05P0019 045 .jpg L05P0019 046.jpg L05P0019 048 .jpg L05P0019 049.jpg L05P0019 050 .jpg L05P0019 051 .Jpg L05P0019 052.Jpg L05P0019 053.jpg L05P0019 054.jpg L05P0019 055.jpg L05P0019 056.jpg L05P0019 057.jpg L05P0019 058.jpg l I I / .(·' .. IJ "'' _ _ i --. 1 ,,_ , , /,.. / f\ J,, .. I '. ··········r ............ , ::1·········· . ' \ \'.\ \ 1 \ ··.. °' ..... \ fl:\ ': .::: RO WDED{CAnON ', ........... .,,,, ...... ., .. ,, .. , ... ,. .. ,....... . .. , i i,. ,,~A.itil&:' I , ;-, ,1 ,i, , \t;,··· ... Q: ' ' , <r , ! !: 4 JI'~""' . i ·,! i l l 'r·· '-:-·· --·rl': ·, · ~ --, l I j> "r"" 1·-. ,, r ,1 , i:>t> 1 • ,· , \""!\. 1 ~ ••• .w •..• _ -.. • • • • i . .. -· , , . i -. -._, "' \ .. A . ~ .. ··---.... :_ ;~···,,-,.J. ••• -6AA /@ll"P .. {-··-····----i·" ,) .... '. L~\ ~ ·-.. ::· .. ~'·\.,.> ·· .. : ·-.,._..~\ ·~· •:e. ' 'L . ·; ·( 24~1~ 't, 3; 20<: ·;:. ...._ ~. 1 .. :; -f"t . , e.• ~-:i;'li: \. ~ \ i 1' ·. :\ J O )i1ss~bti2-ft /1" ~~()rt.,, I 5 · · 12Q 03 . . ' ~-· i ::: l ::: 1br , , \"11, .· ·t·~·, _r: ::-~~;~1 / i ,,t· ...... ' ' ,. '<,} ' • . ; :_\ 6 ~\4-' \ ' . I r i \ ;' "-c \ 0"-·. '-'I · 1 1 : : -.. "'-.---· ' ~f"-. ~ . I : : ·, /.fl-:-.;.;;..;,.~~~ ojo-~~~~e~A· \?,·;.. ; 102· 1,~-....... -·--i--.~ ~= -....... ( ii· ··, ........ , N nu ....... . ~ ..... ,...... . , . ; tw) ', I I : I -i 1 i '\(, 102' \ \ t 0, ! ! 1., 6h' (('\ . . _;1\ • "' ·. <p C\,f .... ,,.___ .... :i:,_ ' 7 76'. l i,..... ~ . r-irnc.~ ) . ll~ .. // <I ·, -<J""e.:)'. -a ' .... V 'j KEE" PI-ID!b 4 3'! I ·: ,, 1 r· .~ ~ \' n '· . . //1; , ,f ~I ·. ff;: .. ~-·-TRACT C '\,~ I!) ·,"J,2 -/~· ~ I ~ l ·" l '. /. . ' ...... Ii) . ··-0 .. -·-~··· ···--·- l.,...,. --.. , ; .. ,, ........... ..,. .. ..,, ........... ,.. ·J··0 )!! lw, DETE"NTION . '}·. ~ ·, -ts --·~::----··--· 1 I s . , 7· ' , .. ' . 126 ·.. Y" i 1· ··· : . ··· ·· ··-... .. i ~::I , ··· 'i· 23. 248 .. SF ... ·,. ...... -. l .@f'tl@} ~ , .. -L 42' L ...... @1~~"(}; . ···· ... _ tr) ... ·· ........ J J \ r \ \ __ -9 ··· ... 1 1_;,. r. r. '\t ·. ·' .... ... '" •. -""' t . t . . . : I \ \ .. ' . . . ..,_ ~., ········ -, '· I b ./ ·. ··.. -···..... "'· -..... (4):lli$~)---··-. ····· ~ ... ·. ;-:::::. -., ____________ ··. ~~-• . . ' <.c .,. . , ............... :~···~~ ., ... o.m:.~.,-~~-. . . . ,. 7 77 . -......... ~-., .•. ~ ,~ff'-s:P.n:~'-1 r . . . . · .. ':. I 1so.~I ,.. .. '":;;~.t f ... .... .... ... ... . ....... /: ~ ! · ... .... . ,;,.. :· .. ,.. --··; ~ ,.~ y-= """'-YB":::::.·.-··;:::;; •.•. ".'-.. ~~:~~96 ~-~ '~ i , : ···· ··· ·· · ·•· ···· ·· ···· ··· ···• · ·, · , ! ...... ,,. · NB'Bi~O '50 W 5 ·1 Q!.2 · · ... , . . ' ; . ' : :.c; l .. · ' ·. ; ~ • . t : • • .,; : .. · . , , , :. . .. ,... . .... ·· ... i I I . · £X. STRUCT'r '0 £S·'-"7i0 :,,;t.9· -.~ .. :,.~:< ., TfE$~«. ~ .iyb,n ~ -!'»~....... ... ..c..: ?.v.,: ~ .. ~'!-"""" (v, .......... , . I:. . . .. ... .. .. !\f \.------1 : r··--··----·-1 I r-·--·-1 I r-----·1 I 18£---REMOV(EDnTYP. ..J·-· .......... . i ; t ·i ; : I ' 1 , r . , 1 1 : ; ---l ·/ t 'I I! 1' ,:, ,,--' '·. • {;<·_ 1 , 1 ·1·· ... _j 1 ___ .. J , 1 1 1 1 . , 1 1 1. : 1 ti\ t \!\ \J rJ\, n~ • i , , , I I . . <1 ·• .\» \\\ • . / \ ': -· · .f i i_ . . J I / i _[ l 1 ,--J L.-1... , ~ \!" \ ii\ R { ~ ~ nc.1-1~---··":- t' ': . : : : I : l 1 1 l -,___ ·· l ;_ 'f la \J ""~~ .. 9-·····-• . ' ,,. . ·. : . • •.• .... -• • l " ""' • ..-.,.""1'." -· ' ,-/ ·,, .. ,. •·. · ' f i ---: : <=-Cn>'""" . . . ... ·, ··.. I , 1 a ,.. ... ffe.\f -~ . . , , ,, ,, . ?..... -· ·-----.,,. ... . . ,,:,, . .. ' . ...c ., .... __ . -----), _,;, ........ .. . . ·>» .. .. .. • .J.. .... -~ \. ........ ·····:0.-:~·: .............. , ... ,,. .... .,, ................. ~ .......... _r ....... -. -~ ....... __ J~·.!!~ ':._-..I(,, Ar ! M l pl> • --;'· · t:1 '.i: ..... , ..... _ ·-· I CT D i •-. ( .,. ~ ' . .. ·---··· -·'""""• :-. -. : ( • f . ' . ·"h -r--.... -.. ·" ! . ___ .. _ ···-·-·-·-' ~--."a•~.·----·· -· .. • ... · I f ! I I I I. ( Martin Prop·erty King County, Washington Level 1 Downstream Analysis Prepared for CamWest Real Estate Development, Inc. ~ ms; Is~2~ mill) Exhibit No. 9 . . Item No. · Y'>'S f <:::lS) I~ K.C. D.D.E.S. RAreived . '3 · 2..2r C3: \\-E. c©i~"'« £ King County Hearing Examiner ~~\~ f J~'-~ . -LOS'PDOI~ Triad Job No. 04-257 ~------- • •· Prepared By: Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis Prepared For: Cam West Real Estate Development, Inc. Martin Property Level 1 Downstream Analysis King County, Washington Issued: September 18, 2005 K.C. D.D.E.S. LOSPOO)°J ~~ .. - Kristen Anderson, E.I.T. Reviewed By: Rebecca Cushman, P.E. 9118/2005 Job #04-257 · /rRIAP Page i --· • • • Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis Table of Contents 1 TASK 1 STUDY AREA DEFINITION & MAPS ................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Area ............................................................................................................................ 2 2 TASK 2 RESOURCE REVIEW ........................................................................... 2 2.1 King County Basin Reconnaissance Program ................................................................. 3 2.2 Sensitive Areas Folio .............................................. : ........................................................... 3 2.3 King County Solis Survey ................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMAJ .......................................................... .4 2.5 King County Wetland lnventory ......................................................................................... 5 3 TASK 3 & 4 FIELD INSPECTION & DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND PROBLEM DESCRIPTIONS ............................................................................. 5 3.1 Existing Site Conditions ..................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Onsite Drainage ................................................................................................................... 6 3.3 Off site Drainage ................................................................................................................... 7 4 TASK 4 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION .................................................. 9 4.1 Downstream Description .................................................................................................... 9 4.2 Downstream Problems ........................................................................................................ 9 5 TASK 5 MITIGATION OF EXISTING OR POTENTIAL PROBLEMS ............... 11 APPENDIX iMAP DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE EXHIBIT ONSITE FEATURES EXHIBITS WESTSIDE OF SITE EASTSIDE OF SITE DRAINAGE BASINS (K.C. BASIN RECONNAISANCE PROGRAM 1987) LOWER CEDAR RIVER BASIN MAP (PRINTED 8-18-05) KING COUNTY COMMUNITY PLANNING AREAS FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP #530071 0350 A (F.E.M.A.) KING COUNTY SOILS SURVEY MAP AND LEGEND REPORT PREPARED BY AESl, INC. (January 27, 2005) TABLE 3.2.2.B OF THE 1998 KCSWDM TOPOZONE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP LOWER CEDAR RIVER TRIBUTARIES OFF SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE OFFSITE ANALYSIS • DRAINAGE COMPLAINT MAP DRAINAGE COMPLAINTS TERRASERVER AERIAL IMAGE SENSITIVE AREAS FOLIO MAPS SIENNA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 9/18/2005 Job #04-257 Page ii Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis • 1 TASK 1 STUDY AREA DEFINITION & MAPS • • 1. 1 Introduction The project proposes to construct 14 single-family lots on approximately 3.71 acres in King County, Washington. The site, currently referred to as Martin Property, is north of the City of Renton boundary and between 144th Place SE and 148th Avenue SE. Martin property is within Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington. The Vicinity Map below shows the general location of the site. This Level I Downstream Analysis describes drainage to and from the site per Tasks 1-5 (Page 2-10 through 2-13) of the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). 911812005 Job #04-257 ··-···· ---..... ···----,---· 1 · I , I I I . i TO 1-405 I I I~ , """""""""" -··-----···-··-·--· "\-·-·------·-·····-·-- )--, MAY ,;,,!,/ ~-.,- -. CUi.JN .' Y PA11°J,.• _.) ..L. ____::.r -1 bl _____ ..t -.. I ·-· Vicinity Map Not to Scale /rRIAD ' I ' II • r-~RKI' f?i[)L , , !--/- ! , i / r···-r- / I Page I • • • Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis 1.2 Study Area The study area, per Tasks 1 & 2 (Definition, Maps and Resource Review), will extend up to I mile downstream of the site. A one mile radius from the site is shown on the King County iMAP (printed 6/16/05) available in the Appendix. The site is rectangularly shaped, with a 15' wide 'flagpole' road on the northeastern edge extending approximately 120' eastward to 148'h Ave NE. The upstream, offsite basin is limited to a small area (less than 0.83 acres) composed of three parcels neighboring the eastern edge (1023059355, 1023059038, and 1023059341 ). As required, the upstream limit goes far enough to preclude any backwater effects from this project. Onsite runoff, flows southwest as evident by the site's topography. A french drain collects runoff a few feet offsite of the western site border in the neighboring Shamrock development's tightlined conveyance system. The intercepted drainage is conveyed to the Shamrock detention wetpond and released gradually via the associated control structure. The downstream, offsite analysis extends to the Maplewood Creek beyond 148'h Ave SE and SE 142"d St leading to the Cedar River. An appendicized iMap figure is available to observe the one mile radius limit around site. Per Tasks 3, 4, and 5, the downstream study area is only required to extend to the quarter-mile point located near 148'h Ave SE and SE 142nd St (as shown on the Existing Conditions Exhibit providing a circle with a Y. mile radius) or a location where the project site area is less than 15% of total tributary drainage area to the quarter-mile point. 2 TASK 2 RESOURCE REVIEW Available maps and information reviewed which are included for the following Resource Review are: Lower Cedar River Basin Map Sensitive Areas Folio Maps FEMA 100-year Flood Plain Map (September 12, 1978) Drainage Complaints on file at King County Records Division King County Community Planning Areas (May 1985) Resources reviewed and listed in the 2005 KCSWDM discussed below include: King County Basin Reconnaissance Program 9/18/2005 Job #04-257 /TR.IAP ,.,..-.--·-- Page 2 • • Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis Sensitive Areas Folio King County Soils Survey FEMA King County Wetlands Inventory Other Offsite Analysis Report.s (more specifically, Sienna Level I Downstream Analysis-dated 8/1/2001 and Shamrock Level I Downstream Analysis-dated 1/1/2004. Resources listed in the 2005 KCSWDM which were not reviewed are: Critical Drainage Area Maps Road Drainage Problems Migration River Studies 2. 1 King County Basin Reconnaissance Program Ac.cording to the King County Basin Reconnaissance Program Summary (Vol. 2), the site is located within the Lower Cedar River Sub-basin of the Cedar River Drainage Basin (see Basin Maps located in the Appendix). The site is located within the Newcastle Community Planning Area as shown on the appendicized delineation of King County Community Planning Areas. 2.2 Sensitive Areas Folio Maps from the King County Sensitive Areas Folio (December 1990) show that the site is not in a sensitive area with regard to seismic hazards, coal mine hazards, erosion hazards, wetlands, streams, or I 00-year flood plain. However, a Class IV wetland has been delineated centrally along the western boundary of the site . 9/18/2005 Job #04-257 /rRIAD ""'' '"'' --·-- Page J • Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis 2.3 King County Soils Survey According to the King County Soils Survey, the majority of the site lies within Alderwood soils (AgB and AgC). \ r·· ".\ /\', A9D -- \ I '\ \ ··, \ AgB ·. , __ " i---· ) n I ·. : \ ./: 1 . ' \ ./· [vB I I / 1· -I ' I ) =::.:..:::,.., . --+----I __ \ -· ·--IV[ AgC Bh~/ \ 4 U-! A VC:\i(H ...._ -· ----... . @'··) . "-· I APPROX/MAT[ Si T[ LOCATION (N TS See the appendicized King County Soils Survey Map and Legend. Table 3.2.2.B of the 1998 KCSWDM classifies this type of soil in the SCS Hydrologic Soil Group C and the Till KCRTS Soil Group (available in the appendix). A 'Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report' (January 27, 2005) prepared by Associated Earth and Sciences, Inc. is available for review in the appendix. 2.4 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) According to the appendicized FEMA Map #530071 0350 A (dated September 29, 1978), the site is not located within a 100-year floodplain. 9/18/2005 Job #04-257 /rRTAD --Page 4 • • • Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis 2.5 King County Wetland Inventory According to the King County Wetlands Inventory Maps there are no wetlands located onsite. However, a small (0.03 acre, approximately) wetland has been observed near the central-western portion of the site. A wetland study will be completed and the wetland area will be marked. Appropriate buffers based on wetland classification will be incorporated into the final design. 3 TASK 3 & 4 FIELD INSPECTION & DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND PROBLEM DESCRIPTIONS The following site description is based upon a field inspection performed on August 24'\ 2005 by Rebecca Cushman, P.E. and Kristen Anderson, E.I.T. (Triad Associates) The weather on August 24th was mildly humid and sunny. The entire site was walked and downstream drainage conditions were examined on that date. Observations are noted in this section. 3. 1 Existing Site Conditions Refer to the 011site Features Exhibits to aid in the following site description. One single-family home along with an associated driveway, two barns and internal fencing currently exist onsite. Approximately 0.03 acres in the central western edge of the site appears to have some wetland characteristics such as reeds, buttercups, and sedges. During this site visit the 0.03 acre area was dry. It appears to be self-contained and did not have outgoing flows. The wetland characteristics do not appear to extend beyond the property line onto the western neighboring parcel. Most of the existing site terrain is mildly sloped (2-5%) from northeast to southwest. Steeper slopes (8-10%) are on the 15' wide flagpole extension. The highest elevation (480 feet) is at the tip of the flagpole extension adjacent to 148 1h Ave NE. The lowest elevation is at the southwest comer (443 feet). The entire site is pastured with some trees and blackberry overgrowth. Deciduous trees are planted in line with three 9/1812005 Job #04-257 --Page 5 • • ' • Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis shallow channels. Three Evergreen trees (30-40 feet tall) are near the existing onsite structures. existing structures. Much of this site is enclosed by fencing. The 15' wide gravel drive running from 148th Ave toward the western property edge is fenced off from the rest of the site except at the garage entrance driveway. The east, west and south property boundaries are entirely fenced. In addition, onsite fence enclosures exist within the site. One 20 x 20 fence enclosure contains blackberry brambles on the west side of the residence's driveway. A second fence enclosure appears to be used as a corral for livestock and is located· in the southeast comer of the site. This corral is offset from the eastern and southern fence line by nearly 10 and20 feet, respectively. 3.2 Onsite Drainage Onsite elevations range from 478 feet to 444 feet. The majority of the site consists of elevations between 444-470 feet. The site elevation in the northeast comer is at elevation 478' at the northern tip of the 15' wide flagpole end (near 148th Ave SE). The slope along the flagpole access route is nearly 9%. This area is graveled and is used a·s access to the current onsite residence's driveway. There are three notable onsite drainage paths that extend to the western edge of the site. One ditch (labeled 'A' on the Onsite Features Map) is on the west half of the northern edge of the site. This ditch crosses in front of the driveway, through blackberry brambles and through a line of medium-sized deciduous alder trees before reaching the west edge of the site. A second ditch (labeled 'B') extends from an upstream eastern parcel along the entire southern edge of the site also · leading drainage to the western edge of the site. This ditch is sporadically lined with blackberry brambles that increase in density toward the west. The southern-edge ditch increases width to nearly four feet as it ventures west. A third ditch (labeled 'C') is located amongst the central path of trees in the western pasture. The overall site has one distinct onsite drainage basins flowing southwest towards the neighboring Shamrock Development. 9/1812005 Job #04-257 /rRJAD Page 6 • Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis Other notable onsite features are shown on the Onsite Features Map. This includes a 2' diameter 'home-made drywell' that exists in the small front yard of the residence. It appears to be an empty metal barrel in the ground with a pipe outlet inside receiving drainage from the south. Drainage entering this drywell drains westerly during overflow to ditch A. A second onsite feature is a I 0-15' long drainage rock path/french drain runs parallel to both the northern fence line and northern corral fence line (labeled as a 'french drain' on Onsite Features Exhibit). This runoff collection appears to outlet to the east-to-west ditch/swale along the southern property line, however the outlet was not observed 3.3 Offsite Drainage The basin's offsite drainage path is described m the following paragraphs. To assist in understanding the narrative, please see the Downstream Drainage Exhibits. The only upstream areas draining to the site are from three eastern adjacent properties (I 023059355, 1023059038, and 1023059341 ). The offsite flow from this site enters a backyard French drain system (D, see Downstream Drainage Exhibit) alongside the Shamrock site's eastern • border. This runoff is incorporated into Shamrock's tightlined storm drainage system and collected in a wet detention pond within Shamrock. The associated control structure releases runoff as required by Level Two Flow Control Standards (matching peaks at the 2-and 10- year, 24-hour storm event and durations between Y, of the 2-year and 50-year storm events). The released runoff flows south through a 120'-42" culvert underneath 128 1h St, into a drainage ditch behind 14415 SE 128 1 h St. The ditch r'.)nges from 2 to 3 feet deep and then travels· 34' under a driveway via an 18-inch culvert. ,No formal drainage complaints were provided by King County or the City of Renton; however, overtopping of the ditch was noted on November 14, 200 I during a site visit on the Sie~na Project. The storm water appeared to be 2-3 feet below the existing house and did not enter the area behind the home within the chain link fence. Once the stormwater reaches the south property line of this parcel, the storm water enters the north property line of a recent development (Sienna). The flow is then ' ' picked up in an emergency overflow birdcage structure at SDMH, tightlined through the 36- inch bypass pipes within the Sienna development and conveyed in a southerly direction. (See Sienna Road and Storm Plans, Sheet IO of 36-available in the appendix). At NE 211 d • Street (a.k.a. NE 132 11 <1 St) the tightlined conveyance is joined by the tightlined and controlled 9/18/2005 Job #04-257 /rRIAD '" ,, ' "' t ' ' -- Page 7 • • • Martin Property -Level'1 Downstream Analysis release from the Sienna wetpond. The 36" tightlined system turns west to run along NE 2nd street and turns south to follow the westside of Jericho Ave NE (a.k.a. 1441h Ave). The tightlined flow is joined by an westward-flowing culvert underneath 144 1h Ave and continues west and then south as a ditch. The ditch is briefly culverted to the south under the intersection between SE 136th Street and 142nd Ave SE, and exits a 42-inch culvert with a trash rack into a large swale known as Maplewood Creek. The Maplewood Creek/swale meanders southand east as shown on the Topozone Topogrpahic Exhibit until reaching the outfall into Cedar River. At the time of the site visit the Maplewood Creek swale was dry. At the 42-inch culvert the creek is a broad swale (20 feet wide) and ten feet deep. The swales width, and especially its depth, increase towards Cedar River. It is more accurately described as a ravine as the drainage path is followed south . 9/18/2005 Job #04-257 /rRIAD ... ---- Page 8 Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis • 4 TASK 4 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION • • 4. 1 Downstream Description Drainage from the site is tributary to one drainage sub-basins. The The tributary associated with this project leads to collection point 6 as shown on the map of Lower Cedar River Tributaries available in the appendix. An aerial of the downstream drainage system· through Maplewood Creek is available in the appendix. 4.1.1 Offsite Runoff to Cedar River Runoff from the basin is tributary to Cedar River and, ultimately, Lake Washington. The following narrative describes the downstream drainage paths for the basin. No downstream drainage problems were observed at the time of field investigation. 4.2 Downstream Problems A list of downstream drainage complaints within a I mile radius of the site was obtained per · King County Request via the 2005 manual. WLRD Stormwater Services Section indicated. that complaints pre-I 990 are not readily available. In addition, complaints older than I 0 years are not required per the 2005 KCSWDM and, therefore, not included. Additionally, King County was not able to locate some of the complaints in the area and will not be included in this report. The list was evaluated for pertinent complaints within the downstream corridors of the site. The following narrative lists the downstream problems reported to the King County Water and Land Resource Division (KCWLRD). Downstream complaints lists for near by developments (ie. Shamrock, Sienna) were reviewed in addition to the complaints obtained for this project. According to complaints compiled by the King County Water and Land Resources Division available in the Shamrock Downstream Analysis (1/1/2004), several instances of past flooding have been reported in areas near the downstream drainage path of the site. Problems of flooding and drainage in the area south of the Sienna project seem to have been 911812005 Job #04-257 /rRTAD Page 9 • • • Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis alleviated with the recent installation of a 36-inch pipe system . Details of these complaints are available in the Shamrock Level I Downstream Analysis. Since the installation of the 36-inch conveyance system there has been one downstream complaint. This complaint comes from the resident at the address of 5511 NE 2nd Street. The resident complains of the roadside ditch overtopping. Per conversations with Ron Straka with the City of Renton, this is considered a maintenance issue. In addition, available topography suggests that potential over-flows from the Sienna project would flow east along 3rd Street to Lyons Avenue, then south along the west side of Lyons Avenue rather than further east to the subject property. Some complaints have been documented near the Martin project's downstream path. A compilation of the drainage complaints reviewed for this site are in the appendix. An Offsite Analysis Drainage System Complaint Map shows the approximate location of the drainage complaints on a Thomas Guide map. King County's 2005 Surface Water Manual does not require drainage complaints that are more than IO years old to be included in a Level Downstream Analysis due to the age of the problem, development that has occurred, etc . A list of drainage complaints within a one mile radius has been compiled and evaluated in reference to the proposed project's downstream drainage pathway. Please refer to the master list of complaints and annotated Offsite Analysis Drainage System Complaint Map included . in the appendix. The complaint map shows the approximate location of the drainage complaints on a Thomas Guide map. King County's 2005 Surface Water Manual does not require drainage complaints that are more than 10 years old to be included in a Level 1 Downstream Analysis due to the age of the problem, development that has occurred, etc. Complaints #1 through #42 have been listed, however, they are not within the downstream drainage path. Copies have been provided as informational only. The following complaints are due to either flooding or erosion. Drainage Complaint #28 (location shown on the Offsite Analaysis -Drainage Complaint Map) was at or near the intersection of 148th Ave SE and S.E. 136th Street in August of 1999. These were concerns about possible future flooding due to development at that location. Drainage Complaint #10 is a description of flooding near Amonte Florist at 480 I NE 4th Renton, WA. This flooding was due to clogged cb's and culverts and appears to be a maintenance issue. The siltation of cb's and culverts will not be 9118/2005 Job #04-257 /11RJAD . . . "' ' " ' ' - Page 10 • Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis aggravated by development of the Martin Property due to not being located within the Martin Site's downstream path. Complaint #30 in August 2000 was due to citizen concern regarding flooding from upstream development. Capital Improvements were under taken to correct historic flooding expressed by this neighbor. The Martin Property is not upstream of this flooding described in this complaint and should not aggravate the situation during development. Complaint #12 in 1997 was flooding in Puget Colony Homes (also not downstream of the Martin Site). Complaint #16 and #17 were of ponding in yards and are not downstream of the proposed site. Complaint #2 and #3 are related to a residence that is low with respect to the road and neighboring lots and storm water tends to pond in the driveway. This residence is not in the drainage path of the Martin property. Complaint #42 and #39 are regarding a pond outlet control structure that is not within the Martin Site's drainage path: It was clogged and flooding. The remaining drainage complaints on record that are not related to flooding or erosion were often related to suspected pollution or broken fences. Complaint #24, #21, #3 7 and #38 were pollution related. Complaint #5 is at or near the intersection of SE I 28th and 143rd is in • regards to possible pollution led to storm drainage system. Complaint # 15 is a broken fence at ~n RID pond outside of our drainage path. Complaint # 31 is a broken fence at easement. Complaint #4 is permission to vacate a road that is unrelated to this project. The proposed development of this site will not aggravate the above mentioned situations. • 5 TASK 5 MITIGATION OF EXISTING OR POTENTIAL PROBLEMS The project proposes to construct a storm water detention pond which will provide Level 2 Flow Control per the 2005 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual. The pond will incorporate sufficient dead storage to also provide Basic Water Quality Treatment in accordance with King County requirements. Additionally, all new stonn water conveyance systems will be designed in accordance with the criteria outlined in the current King County Surface Water Design Manual. 9/18/2005 Job #04-257 /rRIAD " "' ' ', " - Page 11 • • • Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis During the field investigation of the downstream drainage course ongomg erosion or downstream drainage problems were not observed onsite or near Cedar River. To mitigate any potential problems, overflow route for flows larger than the I 0-year peak storm event will be directed into the downstream pipe system. The proposed detention pond will be modeled assuming the existing site as completely forested as required by the 2005 KCSWDM. Flows will be detained and released controlling the 2-and IO-year peak flows as well as matching the durations of storm events from the 1/2 of the 2-year through the 50-year storm . 911812005 Job #04-257 /rRJAD , \" "' I •" ' -Page 12 • • Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis APPENDIX iMAP DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE EXHIBIT ONSITE FEATURES EXHIBITS WESTSIDE OF SITE EASTSIDE OF SITE DRAINAGE BASINS (K.C. BASIN RECONNAISANCE PROGRAM 1987) LOWER CEDAR RIVER BASIN MAP (PRINTED 8-18-05) KING COUNTY COMMUNITY PLANNING AREAS FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP #530071 0350 A (F.E.M.A.) KING COUNTY SOILS SURVEY MAP AND LEGEND REPORT PREPARED BY AESI, INC. (January 27, 2005) TABLE 3.2.2.B OF THE 1998 KCSWDM TOPOZONE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP LOWER CEDAR RIVER TRIBUTARIES OFF SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE OFFSITE ANALYSIS -DRAINAGE COMPLAINT MAP DRAINAGE COMPLAINTS TERRASERVER AERIAL IMAGE SENSITIVE AREAS FOLIO MAPS SIENNA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 9/18/2005 Job #04-257 Page 13 ' • • • Map Output Page I of I Legend !SJ The Buffer ;./ --· D Buffeted Selaciion /,~/ t=i D Thomns Brothers t.'k,p Page D Paroats * WLRD Surfaoe Water Engtneering D Lakes and Large Rivers Projects i'/ St1'8ams . -County Boit.mdnry ~ WLRO Otairwge Complcli:nls I-• Streets ,/ 11":f?MZI)' '""' he information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on his ma is rohibited exce t b written ermission of Kin Coun .King CounJy I GIS Center I New~ I Services I Cqmments. I ~.e:arcll By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. Th~_Q_fil_ails . http: //www5 . metro kc. gov I serv I et/ com. esri .esrimap. Esri map ?Servi ccN amc=o vervi ew &Cl ie... 8/16/2005 NOlONIHS'l'M 'AlNno:, ON/JI SISA 71/Nlf Wl/311.J.SNMOO l 73A37 J.ll:/3d01:/d N/11:/tfW .J.S3MW1f0 .J.IBIHX3 3!11/Nllfl/O Wl/311.J.SMOO II 18 I I I 9' L Si] Fl i s ~ ... ).. ~ i I!! ~ { ~ ~ ::, I I I I =1-i--- 1 ° I I I-~ -L--1 __ ,~- --'--'-~====I==-= ' L ____ -=--C -r--i--r- 1 ,-i I •'', 1' •, I ,•,•,•,•,•,•,•,• '-. : :-:-: ·, '·,. ·-::::_::_::_::_:· .. : ~~. <:::. '•,, .. , : .:::.:: ·: :\~\··· :. :. ·::::::r:: -- - I-, -L _J_ --+-- I I 1 .. ---e--------------..j ------------•t,.....- L .. _ -·, -,,,, It' it ~c Q. (/) If IA ;-{)-o·~-~- '· 6" CONCRETF'CULVERT INLET 0 *'Q ''>:.\:\ 0 --....,, ' ' 0:, \ . ' \ ·7,,·~v, .'./ (--:-} ............... \ ~ •J' ~ ' \ \ \ 0 \ \ \ \ 6 • PVC CUL VERT INLET i ~~ \ : . . ··--.. ... . <--... ., ............ ,-.. -. ~-. ... .: -· ...... ,:,,-0~/TCHC C v.~ ~~ 3.1~ . I ' I \ ~ \ I 1 C (/) ' ' \ 1,SL~.-.1·~ V-_ 1 xJ.: wrA@ 0 , (/) . I -~ / 1& / ;J \ Of .. ,Q ~ * ' \0 \ ~ ,. ,:,, \ \ 0 ·-··v -~5' '- ·, \ \ '\\ \ / '\, ) // // \ ! ',..,d·--. ~~-~-- ···---1.sa .......... , ·, -..... -, '·" ' \'-.. 0 '· ...... ,j_ ,-; --., - \ d·. ' ' ·,, . ·O,._,,. ·' '··-·J5,:; ,,.,,, ~--....., \ _) ·= :60-~ "··\ r ·~:~1 . r ; / / ~ .•. > --~:< / * " •• ~ "\ 1· '\-, \-. .. ~\:·;'11 '·· ... · ( . . "\ ~r··~~ ·-~~ 1 ~ ,,.J>1:YL ~njr 0-~·-· tQ) -:, : .-.. ~ . ' - 'i' ! / ~E ,~-:t:/}:.~. ~ i ~~-:-~.-.... • •• 1 .,,, DITCH C. ' ; * ' 12439 148TH AVE SE 1 STORY L . .. .... WOOO FRAME STRUCTURE I ~ ) .· ---. 1 x\ HB O ·.'-. x r\ ~ · ' *'\ ~YL 1\:4 .~?~~ ;.~:: ·;_~ ~ ~,aAA, • •"', : ' r ' I 71n'--~RHANG _j 7133- &..tie,J;:a ---488 • .L .. EA'v£.1 \ EAVE.1 \ ---=---- ' ' ' I •:.;, ,, .· - ' '· SYtP! I EXDD ·, ··,. '\. \, ·, i ,o ' WOOD BARN \ I * / ' ; ' \_ I 0 CB CATCH BASIN ( T'\'P I ) D D < CULV a,; HB 83 WM -0-UP E-GUY ):l'. 'I\. --x--- --0--- --SD-~ --DHP-- ~~J~tJ DRAIN CUL\£RT HOSE BIB WATER METER UTIUTY PCl.E GUY ANCHOR YARD LIGHT WIRE FENCE AS NOlED WOOD FENCE AS NOTED STORII DRAIN LINE 0\/D!HEAD POWER LINE WATER LINE GAS LINE !TJJJM? -1~1Zltllfl ....... NE ~WA~ 425.821.8"8 ~-kl11b ll00-.WD1M~---- l l•I'""-'" 11 •" ,. 0 ,_ " ~ ).. ~ "' C/) .... ~ "' m ~ .... ~ ~ ~ &: -~ 0 ~ ~ C/) i,..;; .... C/) ~ ~ ~ ,: ,_ § 0 ll "' ~ "' ~ .s ~ ~ ~1! ~ f!! ~~ e<J J·J cJ'.J~I-JJc](lcJ(j ~-----· PRQ./[(T IIANAGEII r':tc~'RVEYOR---~- r~~ =.R·-··--· PROJfCT WW.ii'.!: Alti:llmCT l1KST )t1Jlll(ITTil DATE: SCAL!: HOl'JZ..: NTS Y?JIT.:N1S ', ,. ' .. '".::., 0/TCH 8 · ------1c'1;j...,_,-:-1--···--·---:..= .. -,,:.~:::-. ---0. fJtTCh' 8 / ,/· (. ····-··-· --.. ~ ..... rn ii ii!ix 1 CONCRETE SURFACE ASPHALT SURFACE / / / ,---·~ --·-·" / -----·· ~· .. @ r'" SOIL LOG WETLAND rtAG SfAlfl' NOT YAUP UhU:SS SICNED .IJlll D.1.M JOI! NO. 04-257 SHEET ND. " ©2005 TRIAD ASSOCIATES! _______ _J UP ~-----~ r ·----.... ,,s ' 6,,, ___ \ .--,,,~ f ' ' ' (j, <: 0 \ I ~ . . ' -.;,o --------s,- ··-· --__ ::::;•• ---· ·---· ---~ :·:·4 53 ---\....."r-., "'so.....__, ---------,--- - * '/ -.,, I ~s6 ! \'r J(~J ·/!"' I ' ~ ' . ' . . . .' r i "'r···)·-~)u,,;,J--~ I ' ;p /u .,, ' YARD DRAIN / SHE DRY mL' UP --,Q._ , 4 • INLET PIP£ ---- , .... ·~~- -; f ', p _, I'! i,. -v I l >' P" J ;(Jl _;. . _..:,. ry *°! Q ; ,::;:,, \ , ' I \ 'WIJ I ,. ~-J '. *'\8'.SHE *I \ 1 r ~U;L~I~~ rr44' WM DRAWING IS NOT TO SCALE ; X *T.-~ I\ ' \ \ ' : )j( 12439 148TH AVE SE 1 STORY WOOD FRAME STRUCTURE I ~ \\r r I\ >~ 0--0 ~/~- S'(MBQL l,EGENQ D C8 D D < CULV c';, HB rn WM -0-UP E-GUY :0: YL ----;)(--- -0-----0--- ---SD-- --OHP-- ~~~:i:~}.7~;.1 l':,~n::s:' J&1 :1 @ r" CATCH BASIN ( TYP I DRAIN CULVERT HOSE BIB WATER METER UTILITY POLE GUY ANCHOR YARD LIGHT WIRE FENCE AS NOTED WOOD FENCE AS NOTED STORM DRAIN LINE OVERHEAD PO\\t:R LINE WATER LINE GAS LINE CONCRETE SURFACE ASPHALT SURFACE SOIL LOG WETLAND FLAG :, \ \ ' 7-1· -,.-.;. ~--- ' ' ' ' ',. _ ... ~ -·--.. '- \ ', ',, -, ' ,0 \ ,, Y'>, --'~ I ~HB_o *, r~ WOOD BARN , ,:0:YL ~ I ~!1J'2""'-.J "" • ,':._ j \ . [466.26 AVE.1 ',, "'· FRENCH DRAIN/ROCK PATH APPROX/MA IE LOCA nON) WOOD BARN ·I.:_':,". ~ \ \ .,, \ ~1 l ~ ' L ', X X / \ * DITCH 0~: ~:::: 'i ' ' ' -' J(-=-" \ . 1 ~I .DITCH \ I * x~ .. ------.-*---s / ' "' -------- \ ', \ ' \ ------ \ ------- ------- WM UPI ffi w C'I) ~ C ::c ... ' ... " I !~i -WA~ j 425.821.8448 I 4211.121.kll""" -~... I -- 1:l ~ ... ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ U) ~ 0 " " ~ 'Ii .. ).. .... m ~ 8: ~ ~ Q: ~ ~ l ~ ,: "' ~ 0 " ~ !I~ •I;<" '''''"'')~'•~··-' z -.J....J-..J-.....;--J,j·, '1'1'-J,J',J l'ROJf.fT liUNACER ______ _ PROJ[fl SllR\'f:'iOR ___ _ fliOJ£n f.NCIND.'.R PifilJ!Jt I.ANPSCAPE AKnllTITT mtsr Sl.l9W:ITI'AL PATt> SCAI!: IIORIZ.: YEl!t.: sw•r NOT VAUII llNU:S:S SIGNm AND DATED JOB 110. 04-257 Sl!Ia NO. or • :(. / .• ~ \ ~-~ ) ..... r~1 \l '..\------- \\ i : i :j i ',\ Ii :·1 :"j .: ; i ; 1f I_ / i I \.t . \ > ·~~~!_,, ·-/ 1_ ' , ) Vt-"I_ ,.,,,-; \ - J ! \ ./ \ I . \ I ;( \ ;.; PUq 0 ET .,-:= i) -::.~ r r ' _-,.r .. ,c.. ·I -·LL / -., ·,·"--'-->· { _:.,7-·;.:_ \ \ \ / '~ i '\ : ) ! J J /a/ /! f .... I ' ( ,. v.1-· .DRAINAGES- -· I ~ -r··.""""4.J..-«d. .... -<:.I .' f ·_·ci;;: -~1l ::'I_'--:i• ~~\\ · · C >_ . '· ,\ .. ,,.. -/;)~--"'--'-A ••• '-' ----· '\ --,._ 'i' . "• ~\:,.,_ ~; .......... ~ "-...._ TACOMAt:-...~ \$t. ~-, \~-~ '~, 'so.,_ -l ' \.~ W@ '\. '<...-. ":t ·[ l.. >...:.::c::: ""'" ·::: =1veR __ _ -----~ r--*'--~--,-\ '; ~~r-, _: r,,r--,___/ ·"" ', >-I ~ "-I _r' "-· '-~1 o::.: ~-//~, ·'-:,,-.__ ,. ,. .. ---"'"' "' -~".:"' .. -·-· .,,.;_:,,_._ I ···.,, ~ Norih Fort<. i'.i.:· \: )a I;-.......... RI~ RIVER --...... :·:... " BASIN .... Mlddi. Foil< -~~ e,- ,./(-:z: --' ,·l \ tNOQl//\l."11[ f ,RIVER~ -- -'I ---. ..._ __ ~;;Y t ', /\,::· ,, '·./.:~! ;~ { \--: -/--· .-. -·BAS.IN· ·-·, . ~ ·:_-..... °"c'" f -gi f. ~ {-- -·-· ''-;'. -~ ~ .-;0)~,;-.- \\ -., ' ""' -~-~\ \. ' -. - ,:;:;;:, ... --·,,;.,,~.<. ' ... { ::·-: :n r 0~ SHHL{ "''~HRSM[D -"-· '"'- 1 ~----/ , C -,,__ BASIN =c~\'.:_ \ \ ._,..\;, ---, " ll -,_ .. , I_ ·~··,,, ~-~· ,-1 .", 'l;:~/ /•, ----~ ... ,-{(~,---_.j ~-. ~'· ', \, \ , ... ~~ ! \ ', ; \ -\ -7 \ ... ~- '\1. -··----"'~'''"-...._ ---\-,, ... ~ \, "" ... ·.,. \ ~>-~',...,,,,,i,._; ,:-·· .. ""'v--' -~ -- C s ,'- \ ' "-' ' :; \ __ / ,..,., .. - ., '<' :·) " - : ~. \ -----) I-·;::: . -~,:..__ ,-}\l~ . -· :,."';.!-;:-, :-1 ,·· t. .!_ -$- ' _i .. ; ,- ., ;.-:.: ~ 'i ( DRAINAGE BASINS King County 1987 Major Basin Boundary Sub-Basin Boundary Source: King County Basin Reconnaissance Program O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MIies 1: 300,000 Lower Cedar River Basin Map Page 1 of 1 ® King County IIIII!'l!'.mll lllE!DIII Ki§4'1B4¥ Wi¥iB,M • f : --· · · , Natural Resources and Parks " • • Water and land Resources Division " Lower Cedar River Basin ' ·,;_,, ••' ..... •, ·-·· · fob:u,1~,,i.:,, Back tQ the <;:EJdc1r_Ri'1<'ll S..i.sinJ:Jan Updated: May 29, 1998 \ ., . . .:··., _. __ \ ' l,u:l Cru.li .,.,,, •, King County I Natural Resources & Parks I Water & Land I New.§ I Services I Comments I Search Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County . By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. http://dnr.metrokc.gov/wlr/BASINS/cedarmap.htm 8/18/2005 • • I\ ,., i i i I / i i j / j ::; \ ·, I i ,-- \ "\ -'i, i ~i I/ ! ~ .::. \ , '{, .. Figure 1 KING COUNTY COMMUNITY PLANNING AREAS King County 1986 0 1 2 S 4 S 6 7 IMf ... 11 S00,000 =-L·.,· ! • • • Th is map Is for flood Insurance purposes only; It does not n ece s- !uily show all areu subject to floodi n1 In the community or all planim etric fea tures o u tside special nood hazard arus. For adjoinin g map p .i nels, see separately printed Index To Ma p Panels. ""'=-.-.., For dtscription of Elevat ion Reference Marks, see panel 530071 0175A ) I ~\ '\J...... I ~ '~-. ,L~-..---=, \..i.>-.J INITIAL IDENTIFICATION JAN UARY 17, 1975 U~J:-'..:3 J . "'-i ···-r~ -;~·---· rr~~~o:; CONVERSION TO REGULAR PROGRAM SEPTEM BER 29, 1978 Refer to the CONVERSION TO REGULAR PROGRAM date shown on this map to determine when actuari al rates apply to structures in the zones where eltvations or dcp1hs have been estabhsh~d. To determine It rlood insurance is av.iilable in this community, conuct yoµr insur.ince agent, or call the National Flood lnsu r- .ince Progr.im, at (800) 638~620, or (800) 4 24 -8872. ~ APPROX IM ATE SCALE 2000 0 2000 FEET E--3 F--3 E-3 ~···"':· 'Z. $---- ' ~--- \A. ~ ~ -u ZONE B , f ~w ,: '~, ..........,,) --~ ")..._, '"\ --··-. ·-j \ "• . ' ~ ""----..., ~~~=t:~LJ' :; . ~) ·-\,,, ,~~\ ~ I] ~. rfr:1.·4 . ri~ ( : · [! · · Tl ·s ~-· , 0 ·, f "' ). · •j , · ~ .. --,,....= L· ,: f=J; ,. " '\. J_/ } <'·-~-:. , ' l -~, \ -~·i II ) \"_L .... -··-- t 4--~) \ •( v-© \ ~~~ O"JE C L Aff~,~T~Sr t-0'-ATION t f. , ---L ... ~= tJ. --...... ~~ri1" =-' ~ ~-;..\If;. NE l l ' I.A \) 'i) I ~Wl'I I t=i ~ r .=~·"] ~ ~ • r I • P ' L~ I r t I f r-.---, · -· 1. f ~~"==-. f -1 r . ~-\ 1 I • _ . ' ~~rl ll ~.-l,,JTLJ.1-•-, • I ·-·1 I I 1-r;--·1. ~. +-t-- _, Li----. -, 1_ 1 ____ = ·:. ~=~~, ~- 1 . yr ZONE u !-\-4 >11'l "---~'-=-....,,) ':) ~ r t--=r::......:..-..~ f \ __ Ed/ t, J· 1 I. . o _ '\:.. '\, 1 --~~-1 l' i 1 ~ 1 L P ~I t\~Jlif \ 1\ ~l -,~<11 \ ; r~ -NATIOIIAL FLOOD IN;~CE PIOGIAM lilillil lilillli FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON (UNINCORPORATED AREAS ) COMMUNITY -PANEL NUMBER 530071 0350 A PAGE 350 OF 650 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PAGES NOT PRINTED) EFFECTIVE SEPTE MB ER 29, 19 78 ~¥\ I ~ I U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING ANO URBAN DEVELOPMENT .F EDE RAL INSURANCE ADM IN ISTRATI O N L -=-=, 182 ' ~ ZONE B · f·l. -' --~ i \"":±te .. ,,,,_ . \.. ~ ._~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ • f V ~ " • /\_ 530071 0175 A ~ ,u q_S.: 530071 530071 0475 A .c " .., ::s .. i 5 .!: Town o f Blac k Diamond 530071 0575 A 5300 53007 530071 SOIL MA..P ~INC::i COLJt-JT)' SOILS SURVEY MI\P SHEET N0.11 KING COUNTY AREA, WASHINGTON (RENTON QU ADRANGLE ) K\N6 (D. ~ILS SUT?.vE.'/ ¥\I N6 CDUN\'f SOIL-S SUR\JEy L£~END. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE CONSERVATION SERVICE SOIL LEGEND The first capitol letter is rha initiol"one of the soil name. A second capitol !.,tter, A, B, C, D, E, or F, indicates rhe class of slope. Symbols without o slope le!!er Ofo, those of neorly level soils. SYMBOL NAME ~ AgB AgC AgO AkF AmB AMC Ao B•C B•D BoF Oh •• Ba Cb Eo Ed E•B hC E•D E-C loA loC loD KoB KoC K,O K,C Mo N•C Ng Nk No °' D, 0.C 0.0 0.F Pc Pk Pv P, RcC RcO RdC RdE Ro Rh Sc Sh <k Sm So Sc s, Sa fo u, We Alderwood gravelly sandy loom, 0 to 6 percent slopes Alderwood gravelly sandy loom, 6 to 15 percent slopes Alderwood grove Hy 11ondy loom, 15 to 30 percent 5lopes Alderwood <lnd Kitsap soils, very sleep Arents, Alderwood moteriol,0 •o 6 percent slopes• Arenu, Alderwood moteriol, 6 to 15 percent slopes• Arotnts, Everelt material• Beousire gravelly sandy loam, 6 lo 15 percent :slopes B~usile gravelly sandy loom, 15 to 30 percen, slopes Heousite grovelly sondy loom, 40 to 75 pe,cenl slopes O•lllnghom •"• 1-m Brisco! slit loam Bvcldey silt loom Coostol Beoches Earlmont sih loom Edgewlck fine sarn:ly loom Everett gravelly sandy loom, 0 to 5 percenl slopes Everen gravelly sandy loom, 5 10 15 percenl slopes Evere!t gravelly sandy loom, 1510 30 percenl slopes Everell•Alderwood g,0 vell)' sondy looms, 6 10 15 percent slopes Jndionolo loamy fine 11ond, 0 lo 4 percent 11lopes !ndlanolo loomy fine sand, 4 10 15 percent , lopes lndionolo loomy fine 5ond, 15 lo 30 pe,c.,nt ,!op<1S Kir•op silt loom, 2 10 8 percent ,.lopes Kiisop sih loom, 8 to 15 percent slopes K,tsop sih loom, 15 10 30 p<>rcenl slopes Kious 9rovel!1-loomy sond, 6 to 15 percenl slopes Mi•ed alluvial land Neilion very grovelly !oomy sand, 2 to 15 perc,ent slopes Ne ... ber9 sih loom Nook'lock ~ill loom NoHno sandy loom Orcos peo• 0-idio si Ir loom Ovall gravelly loom, 0 ro 15 percent slopes Ovoll gravelly loom, 15 10 25 percent slopes Ovo!I gravelly loom, 40 lo 75 percent slopes Plkhuck loamy fine sand Pikhuck Fine soody loom Pugel !Ii lty cloy loom Puyollup fine sandy loom Ragnar Fine sandy loom, 610 15 percent slopes Rognor fine sond)' loom, 15 To 25 percent slopes Rognar-tndionolo ossocio!lon, sloplng • Rognor-lndlonolo ossoclot!on, mOOerotely steep• Renton :s I h loom R!verwosh Sotol slh loom Sommomish silt loom Seollle muck Sholcor muck SI 11ilt loom Snohomish slit loom Snohomish slh loom, thick surface vofionl Sulton sHT loom Tukwila muck Urban land Woodlnvllle slit loom • The composition of these units is more "orioble 1hon !hot of the others in the oreo, bvT II hos been controlled well enough to Interpret fo, th• expected use of lhe soil5. KING COUNTY A.REA, WASHINGTC Bounder,.-, no ti ona I Stole ..... County, Pori,.h, (ivil township, I lncoq>oro•ed c ily Smoll pork, ceme :_ ... J ... -··· ! ........ , ••••. ·-'"'"">!• ~c•ion line, Un,rec SHtion line, oppro, Town11hip line, no• Stclion line, nol U" Section c0tne,, f0un Buildings (d-elling, School, church, o"ne line, p,r,e Tonk~; o;I, ..,..,.,,, .,, Qrher recoverable , Horizor,101 control sll Any rec uverob le "" Vt1t1icol control stori Q1h.,, recoverobl•, (h•cked spot elevoli, • • • SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION, GEOLOGIC HAZARD, AND PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT MARTIN PROPERTY King County, Washington Prepared for: CamWcst Development, Inc. 9720 NE 120'h Place, Suite 100 Kirkland, Washington 98034 Prepared by: Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. 911 5'" A venue, Suite I 00 Kirkland, Washington 98033 425-827-7701 Fax: 425-827-5424 January 27, 2005 Project No. KE04710A e • • Martin Property King County, Washington 1.0 INTRODUCTION Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Project and Site Conditions I. PROJECT AND SITE CONDITIONS This report presents the results of our subsurface exploration, geologic hazard, and preliminary geotechnical engineering study for the proposed new residential development. Our recommendations are preliminary in that project plans are still under development at the time of our exploration and preparation of this report. The project site location is shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure l. The existing site features, topography, and approximate locations of the explorations accomplished for this study are presented on the Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 2. The locations · of the proposed improvements were not available at the time this report was completed. Therefore, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report should be reviewed and modified, or verified, as necessary once project plans and details are developed. 1. l Purpose and Scope The purpose of this study was to provide subsurface data to be used in the preliminary design of the project. Our study included a review of selected geologic literature, excavating exploration pits, and performing geologic studies to assess the type, thickness, distribution, and physical properties of the subsurface sediments and shallow ground water conditions. Preliminary geotechnical engineering studies were completed to formulate our recommendations for site preparation, site grading, house construction, drainage, and paving. This report sununarizes our current fieldwork and offers development recommendations based on our present understanding of the project. We recommend that we be allowed to review project plans prior to construction to verify that our geotechnical engineering recommendations have been correctly interpreted and incorporated into the design. Additional exploration or design modifications/review may be required to finalize project documentation. 1.2 Authorization Written authorization to proceed with this study was granted by Ms. Sara Slatten of CamWest Development, Inc. (CamWest) by means of a signed copy of our scope of work and cost proposal dated November 9, 2004. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Cam West and their agents for specific application to this project. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering and engineering geology practices in effect in this area at the time our report was prepared. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. SGU/s11 -f<E04710A2 -Proje.cH\2004710\KC.\W/' Page 1 • • • Martin Property King County, Washington 2.0 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Project and Site Conditions This report was completed with an understanding of the project based on a preliminary plot plan with proposed exploration locations provided to us by CamWest. The plan does not show lot layouts or road locations. Site grading plans were also not available when this report was prepared. The plot plan was used as a basis for Figure 2 of this report. The project site includes one rectangular-shaped parcel currently developed as a rural residential property. The parcel is roughly 3 .69 acres in overall area. A house·. and barn occupy the eastern portion of the parcel. The north, west, and south property lines border existing CamWest developments currently under construction. The eastern property line borders other rural residential properties. The majority of the property is covered with pasture used for goat, sheep, and horse grazing. Deciduous trees are scattered throughout the property. A small ephemeral wetland exists near the west property line. Overall vertical relief across the site is approximately 24 feet. The property slopes gently to the southwest. The proposed project is anticipated to include construction of residential building lots, access roads, buried utilities, and other typical improvements. The planning for this project was in the conceptual phase at the time this report was written and details such as cut and fill areas ·and amounts, lot and street layouts, detention facility locations, etc. were not known. However, we assume that storm water detention facilities will be constructed in the southwest site corner or storm water will be conveyed to the adjacent CamWest development storm water facilities. 3.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Our field study included tl1e planned excavation of nine exploration pits to gain subsurface information about the site. The exploration locations were staked in the field by CamWest during our subsurface exploration. The various types of sediments, as well as the depths where characteristics of the sediments changed, are indicated on the exploration logs presented in the Appendix. The depths indicated on the logs where conditions changed may represent gradational variations between sediment types in the field. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the nine exploration pits completed for this study. The number, locations, and depths of the explorations were completed within site and budgetary constraints. Because of the nature of exploratory work below ground, extrapolation of subsurface conditions between field explorations is necessary. It should be noted that differing subsurface conditions may sometimes be present due to the random nature of deposition and the alteration of topography January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SC/F;NCF;S, INC. SGJl!m -KI::D4710A2 -Proji!cu\20047/0\KE\WP Page 2 e e • Martin Property King County, Washing/On Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Project and Site Conditions by past grading and/or filling. The nature and extent of any variations between the field explorations may not become fully evident until construction. If variations are observed at that time, it may be necessary to re-evaluate specific recommendations in this report and make appropriate changes. 3 .1 Exploration Pits The exploration pits were excavated using a rubber-tired backhoe. The pits permitted direct, visual observation of subsurface conditions. Materials encountered in the exploration pits were studied and classified in the field by a geotechnical engineer from our firm. All exploration pits were backfilled immediately after examination and logging. Selected samples were then· transported to our laboratory for further visual classification and testing, as necessary. 4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions at the project site were inferred from the field explorations accomplished for this study, visual reconnaissance of the site, and review of selected geologic literature. The general distribution of geologic units is shown on the field logs in the Appendix to this report. The explorations generally encountered a relatively thick sequence of topsoil and organic weathered soils over medium dense grading to very dense silty sand with gravel and cobbles interpreted as lodgement till. The on-site sediments are mapped as Vashon till deposits on the Geologic Map of King County, Washington by Booth et al., 2002. 4.1 Stratigraphy Grass/Topsoil A surficial layer of grass and organic topsoil was encountered at the location of each of the exploration pits. This organic layer ranged from approximately 10 to 31 inches in thickness. Due to their high organic content, these materials are not considered suitable for foundation, roadway, or slab-on-grade floor support, or for use in a structural fill. Below the organic topsoil, we encountered loose to medium dense, brown to dark brown weathered soils derived from the underlying lodgement till. This material varied across the site in thickness, density, and organic/root/wood content. It is not considered suitable for foundation support, but may be used at the discretion of the Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AES!) field representative for support of pavement and structural fill in areas where it contains only minor amounts of organics, and can be compacted to project specifications described in the Preliminary Design Recommendations section of this report. Because of its relatively high organic content, it should not be used as structural fill . .January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGB/sn --KE04710t12 -l'mjtct1\20047JO\KE\WJ' Page 3 • • • Martin Property King Coumy, Washington Vashon Lodgement Till Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Project and Site Conditions All of our exploration pits encountered medium dense grading to very dense, silty sand with gravel, cobbles, and occasional boulders interpreted as lodgement till. The lodgement till observed in our explorations graded from mottled gray and brown near the surface to gray and weakly to moderately cemented at depth. Lodgement till was deposited at the base of an active continental glacier and was subsequently compacted by the weight of the overlying glacial ice. Lodgement till typically possesses high strength and low compressibility attributes that are favorable for support of foundations, floor slabs, and paving with proper preparation. Lodgement till is silty and moisture-sensitive. In the presence of moisture contents above the optimum moisture content for compaction purposes, lodgement till can be easily disturbed by .vehicles and earthwork equipment. Careful management of moisture-sensitive soils, as recommended in this report, will be needed to reduce the potential for disturbance of wet lodgement till soils and costs associated with repairing disturbed soils. 4.2 Hydrology Ground water was encountered in several exploration pits at or near the contact with the weathered soil and lodgement till. Our exploration pits provide a reasonable assessment of ground water conditions that may be encountered during normal construction activities during the middle or beginning of the "wet" season. We expect that increased seepage could occur throughout the site during normal construction activities that begin towards the end of the "wet" season in April. This seepage is representative of interflow. Inter flow commonly occurs in areas underlain by lodgement till and originates as surface water that percolates down through the near-surface, relatively permeable weathered soils and becomes trapped or "perched" atop the underlying, relatively impermeable, unweathered lodgement till sediments. lnterflow is often a seasonal phenomenon. It should be noted that the presence and depth of seepage at the site may vary in response to such factors as changes in season, precipitation, and site use. 4.3 Laboratory Test Results Laboratory testing on selected soil samples from explorations was completed in accordance with report requirements typically requested by CamWest. Laboratory testing results are also included in the Appendix. Moisture content was tested in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM):D-2216. Table I summarizes the moisture content laboratory results. Table I also provides the depth to bearing soils identified in each test pit . January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGJJl.~n -KF.047/0A2 -/'rojiicts\2004710\KElWi' Page 4 • • • Martin Property King County, Washington Table 1 Approximate Ground Surface Depth to Exploration Elevation Bearing Soil Pit (feet) (feet) EP-1 453 2 EP-2 450 2 EP-3 455 2 EP-4 462 3 EP-5 465 3 EP-6 448 3.5 EP-7 453 3 EP-8 457 2.5 EP-9 457 1.5 Subswface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Project and Site Conditions Approximate Bearing Soil Elevation Existing Moisture Content (feet) (percent)· 451 14.2@ 3' 448 14.2@ 3.5' '453 16.3@ 3' 459 14.0@ 3' 462 20.5 @3' 444.5 10.9@ 4' 450 12.8@ 3.5' 454.5 15.6@ 3' 455.5 18.4@ 2.5' · All samples arc above optimum moisture content for compaction . The maximum dry density of one soil sample was determined using the modified Proctor test procedure (ASTM: D-1557). The results are as follows in Table 2. Table 2 Maximum Dry Density Optimum Moisture Content Sample Location Sample Type (pct)('> (percent)U> EP-1@ 3' Lodgement Till 135.4 7 0 > pcf = pounds per cubic foot. <2) Reported results are corrected for gravel ·content. January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EART// SCIENCES, INC. SGillm -Kf.04710112 -Projects\20047/0\KElWP Page 5 • • • Martin Property King County, Washington Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Geologic Hazards and Mitigations II. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS The following discussion of potential geologic hazards is based on the geologic, slope, and shallow ground water conditions as observed and discussed herein. 5.0 SEISMIC HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS Earthquakes occur in the Puget Lowland with great regularity. Most of these events are small and are usually not felt by humans. However, large earthquakes ~o occur as evidenced by the 2001, 6.8-magnitude event; the 1965, 6.5-magnitude event; and the 1949, 7.2--magnitude event. The 1949 earthquake appears to have been the largest in this region during recorded history and was centered in the Olympia area. Evaluation of earthquake return rates indicates that an earthquake of the magnitude between 5.5 and 6.0 is likely within a given 20-year period. Generally, there are four types of potential geologic hazards associated with large seismic events: 1) surficial ground rupture; 2) seismically induced landslides; 3) liquefaction; and 4) ground motion. The potential for each of these hazards to adversely impact the proposed project is discussed below. 5 .1 Surficial Ground Rupture Generally, the largest earthquakes that have occurred in the Puget Sound area are sub-crustal events with epicenters ranging from 50 to 70 kilometers in depth. For this reason, no surficial faulting or earth rupture, as a result of deep, seismic activity has been documented, to date, in the area of the subject site. Therefore, it is our opinion, based on existing geologic data, that the risk of surface rupture impacting the proposed project is low. 5. 2 Seismically Induced Landslides It is our opinion that the risk of damage to the proposed structures by seismically induced landsliding is low due to gentle slope inclinations that exist on the site. 5. 3 Liquefaction Liquefaction is a temporary loss in soil shear strength that can occur when loose granular soils below the ground water table are exposed to cyclic accelerations such as those that occur during earthquakes. The observed site soils were generally dense and silty and are not expected to be prone to liquefaction. A detailed liquefaction analysis was not completed as a part of this study, and none is warranted, in our opinion. January 27, 2005 ASSOC!Art:D EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGR/m -K£047J()A2 -ProjeCIS\20047/0\KE\WI' Page 6 e • • Marlin Property King County, Washington 5.4 Ground Motion Subswface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Geologic Hazards and Mitigations The project site is located within a Zone 3 rating for seismic activity on a scale of I (lowest) to 4 (highest) based on the Seismic 'Zone Map of the United States, Figure No. 16-2 in the 1997 edition of the Uniform Building Code (UBC). This zonation is based on past earthquake activity in the Puget Sound region. As such, design recommendations in this report accommodate the possible effect of seismic activity in areas with a Zone 3 rating corresponding to a peak ground acceleration of 0.2g (a Richter magnitude 7.5 earthquake occurring directly beneath the site) in accordance with UBC guidelines using soil type Sc. This soil type corresponds to seismic coefficients: C, = 0.33 and C, = 0.45. Design of the project should also he consistent with 2003 International Building Code (IBC) guidelines. In accordance with the 2003 IBC, the following values should he used: Site Class "C" (Table 1615.1.1) Ss = 125% (Figure 1516[1]), F, = 1.0 (Table 1615.l.2[1]) S1 = 45% (Figure 1516[2)), F, = 1.4 (Table 1615.1.2[2]) 6.0 EROSION HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS The sediments underlying the site generally contain silt and fine sand and will be sensitive to erosion, especially in the sloping portions of the site. In order to reduce the amount of sediment transport off the site during construction, the following recommendations should be followed. I. Silt fencing should be placed around the lower perimeter of all cleared area(s). All silt fencing must be keyed into the existing subgrade a minimum of 6 inches. The fencing should be periodically in_spected and maintained as necessary to ensure proper function. 2. To the extent possible, earthwork-related construction should proceed during the drier periods of the year and disturbed areas should be revegetated as soon as possible. Temporary erosion control measures should be maintained until permanent erosion control measures are established. 3. Areas stripped of vegetation during construction should be mulched and hydroseeded, replanted as soon as possible, or otherwise protected. During winter construction, hydroseeded areas should be covered with clear plastic to facilitate grass growth . Janumy 27, 200.5 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGRl~n -Kf047JOA2 -/'1oject1\20047!0\KE\WP Page 7 • • • Manin Property King County, Washington Subsu,face Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Geologic Hazards and Mitigations 4. If excavated soils are to be stockpiled on the site for reuse, measures should be taken to reduce the potential for erosion from the stockpile. These could include, but are not limited to, covering the pile with plastic sheeting, the use of low stockpiles in flat areas, and the use of straw bales/silt fences around pile perimeters. 5. Interceptor swales with rock check dams should be constructed to divert storm water from construction areas and to route collected storm water to an appropriate discharge location. 6. A rock construction entrance should be provided to reduce the amount of sediment transported off-site on truck tires. 7. All storm water from impermeable surfaces, including driveways and roofs, should be tightlined into approved facilities and not be directed onto or above steeply sloping areas (including cut and fill slopes). 7.0 LANDSLIDE HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS The project site is characterized by gentle slopes with a low landslide risk and no detailed landslide hazard analysis is warranted, in our opinion. \ January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Sr.Olm -KE047JOA2-P,ojcr.ts\2{XJ4710\KF.\WP Page 8 e e e Martin Property King County, Washington Subswface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations III. PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 8.0 INTRODUCTION Our exploration indicates that, from a geotechnical standpoint, the proposed project is feasible provided the recommendations contained herein are properly followed. The bearing stratum is relatively shallow, and conventional shallow foundations and standard pavement sections should perform well with proper subgrade preparation in most areas. 9.0 SITE PREPARATION Site preparation of building and pavement areas should include removal of all grass, trees, brush, debris, and any other deleterious materials. If the existing structures are not part of future development plans, the structures should be demolished and any remaining foundation elements or buried utilities that are not to remain operational should be removed. All existing fill around structures that are to be demolished should be removed. Existing septic systems that are not to be reused should be decommissioned in accordance with King County Health Department requirements and removed from beneath any areas where structures or paving are pla1med. If any water wells exist on-site, they should be decommissioned by a licensed well driller in accordance with Washington Administrative Code Section 173-160. If any heating oil storage tanks or other similar structures are present on-site, they should be decommissioned and removed in accordance with applicable Washington State Department of Ecology regulations. Any depressions below planned final grades caused by demolition activities should be backfilled with structural fill as discussed under the Structural Fill section. The existing grass, topsoil, and organic weathered soils should be removed from areas where new buildings, paving, or other structures are planned. These materials will "swell" some 25 to 30 percent upon excavation. The actual observed in-place depth of sod, topsoil, and organic weathered soils at the exploration locations is presented on the exploration logs in the Appendix. After stripping, remaining roots and stumps should be removed from structural areas. All soils disturbed by stripping and grubbing operations should be recompacted as described below for structural fill. Once excavation to subgrade elevation is complete, the resulting surface should be proof-rolled with a loaded dump truck or other suitable equipment. Any soft, loose, or yielding areas should be excavated to expose suitable bearing soils. The subgrade should then be compacted to at least 90 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density as determined by the ASTM:D-1557 test procedure. Structural fill can then be placed to achieve desired grades, if needed. January 27, 200.5 ASSOCIATED EA/1111 SCIENCES, INC. SGBlsn • Kl.:."047/0A2 -Pmj,cts\2004710\KE\WP Page 9 • • • Martin Property King County, Washington 9. l Temporary Cut Slopes Subswface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations In our opinion, stable construction slopes should be the responsibility of the contractor and should be determined during construction. For estimating purposes, however, temporary unsupported cut slopes can be planned at I H: 1 V (Horizontal: Vertical) or flatter in the lodgement till. Permanent cut or fill slopes should not be steeper than 2H: 1 V. These slope angles are for areas where ground water seepage is not encountered, and assume that surface water is not allowed to flow across the temporary slope faces. If ground or surface water is present when the temporary excavation slopes are exposed, flatter slope angles will be required. As is typical with earthwork operations, some sloughing and raveling may occur and cut slopes may have to be adjusted in the field. In addition, WISHA/OSHA regulations should be followed at all times. 9.2 Site Disturbance Most of the on-site soils contain substantial fine-grained material which makes them moisture- sensitive and subject to disturbance when wet. The contractor must use care during site preparation and excavation operations so that the underlying soils are not softened. If disturbance occurs, the softened soils should be removed and the area brought to grade with structural fill. 9.3 Winter Construction Due to the high in-situ moisture content of most of the site soils determined by laboratory testing completed for this study, it will be necessary to dry some of the site soils during favorable dry weather conditions to allow reuse in structural fill applications. If construction takes place in winter, drying is not expected to be feasible, and we anticipate that the lodgement till soils will be unsuitable for structural fill applications. Even during dry weather, site soils excavated for installation of buried utilities might not be suitable for utility backfill under paving or other structures. We recommend budgeting for backfill of buried utility trenches in structural areas with imported, select structural fill. For summer construction, significant, but unavoidable effort may be needed to scarify, aerate, and dry site soils that are above optimum moisture content to reduce moisture content prior to compaction in structural fill applications. Care should be taken to seal all earthwork areas during mass grading at the end of each workday by grading all surfaces to drain and sealing them with a smooth-drum roller. Stockpiled soils that will be reused in structural fill applications should be covered whenever rain is possible . If winter construction is expected, crushed rock fill could be used to provide construction staging areas. The stripped subgrade should be observed by the geotechnical engineer and should then be covered with a geotextile fabric such as Mirati SOOX or equivalent. Once the January 27, 2005 ASSOC/A TED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGB'5n -KE04710A2 -Pmju:tsl20047JOIKF.\WP Page 10 • • • Martin Properry King County, Washington Subsu,jace Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations fabric is placed, we recommend using a crushed rock fill layer at least 10 inches thick in areas where construction equipment will be used. If desired, planned roadways can be paved with . asphalt treated base (ATB) for construction staging as described in the Pavement Recommendations section of this report. 10.0 STRUCTURAL FILL Structural fill may be necessary to establish desired grades. All references to structural fill in this report refer to subgrade preparation, fill type, placement, and compaction of materials as discussed in this section. If a perc~ntage of compaction is specified under another section of this report, the value given in that section should be used. After stripping, planned excavation, and any required overexcavation have been performed to the satisfaction of the geotechnical engineer/engineering geologist, the upper 12 inches of exposed ground should be recompacted to 90 percent of ASTM:D-1557. If the subgrade contains too much moisture, adequate recompaction may be difficult or impossible to obtain and should probably not be attempted. In lieu of recompaction, the area to receive fill should be blanketed with washed rock or quarry spans to act as a capillary break between the new fill and the wet subgrade. Where the exposed ground remains soft and further overexcavation is impractical, placement of an engineering stabilization fabric may be necessary to prevent contamination of the free-draining layer by silt migration from below. After recompaction of the exposed ground is tested and approved, or a free-draining rock course is laid, structural fill may be placed to attain desired grades. Structural fill is defined as non-organic soil, acceptable to the geotechnical engineer, placed in maximum 8-inch loose lifts with each lift being compacted to 95 percent of ASTM:D-1557. In the case of roadway and utility trench filling, the backfill should be placed and compacted in accordance with King County codes and standards. The top of the compacted fill should extend horizontally outward a minimum distance of 3 feet beyond the location of the perimeter footings or roadway edges before sloping down at a maximum angle of 2H: 1 V. The contractor should note that any proposed fill soils must be evaluated by AESI prior to their use in fills. This w·ould require that we have a sample of the material at least 72 hours in advance to perform a Proctor test and determine its field compaction standard. We have completed one such test on a representative sample of the-lodgement till and the results are included in this report. Soils in which the amount of fine-grained material (smaller than the No. 200 sieve) is greater than approximately 5 percent (measured on the minus No. 4 sieve size) should be considered moisture-sensitive. Use of moisture-sensitive soil in structural fills should be limited to favorable dry weather and dry subgrade conditions. The on-site lodgement till contains substantial amounts of silt and is considered highly moisture-sensitive when excavated and used as structural fill. At the time of our exploration program, soil January 27, 2005 ASSOC/A TED EARTH SCIENCJiS, INC. SG/llsn -KFfl47/0A2-J'rojccts\10047/0\KE\WP Page 11 • • • Martin Property King County, Washington Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnica/ Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations moisture content tests indicated that all soils encountered were at moisture conditions above optimum for structural fill use. We anticipate that most excavated lodgement till soils will require aeration and drying prior to compaction in structural fill applications. Construction equipment traversing the site when the soils are wet can cause considerable disturbance. If fill is placed during wet weather or if proper compaction cannot be obtained, a select import material consisting of a clean, free-draining gravel and/or sand should be used. Free-draining fill consists of non-organic soil with the amount of fine--grained material limited to 5 percent by weight when measured on the minus No. 4 sieve fraction and at least 25 percent retained on the No. 4 sieve. 11.0 FOUND A TIO NS Spread footings may be used for building support when they are founded on approved structural fill placed as described above, or on the glacial sediments that are prepared as recommended in this report. Based on our observations, suitable foundation bearing soils are expected approximately 1.5 to 3.5 feet below the existing ground surface on each lot. The depth to suitable foundation bearing soils is presented in a table in the Subsurface Conditions section of this report. If existing fill is discovered around existing structures, it should be removed and replaced with structural fill, which is also suitable for foundation support. For residential structures, footings may be designed for an allowable foundation soil bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf) including both dead and live loads. Detention vault foundations excavated into dense native till can be designed with a 6,000 psf maximum allowable soil bearing pressure. An increase of one-third may be used for short-term wind or seismic loading. Perimeter footings should be buried at least 18 inches into the surrounding soil for frost protection. However, all foundations must penetrate to the prescribed bearing stratum and no foundations should be constructed in or above loose, organic, or existing till soils. In addition, all footings must have a minimum width of 14 inches for one-story structures, 16 inches for two-story structures, or 18 inches for three-story structures. Anticipated settlement of footings founded as recommended should be on the order of '.\4 inch or less, with differential settlement of 1/, inch or less. However, disturbed material not removed from footing trenches prior to footing placement could result in increased settlements. All footing areas should be inspected by AES! prior to placing concrete to verify that the foundation subgrades are undisturbed and construction conforms to the recommendations contained in this report. Such inspections may be required by King County. Perimeter footing drains should be provided as discussed under the section on Drainage Considerations . January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EAJIT/l SCIENCES, INC. SGR/\11 -KE047/0112 ·· Proje1:ul20047JOIKE\WP Page 12 • • • Martin Property Ki11K County, Washington Subswface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations It should be noted that the area bounded by lines extending downward at IH: IV from any footing must not intersect another footing or intersect a filled area which has not been compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM: D-1557. In addition, a I. SH: IV line extending down and away from any footing must not daylight because sloughing or raveling may eventually undermine the footing. Thus, footings should not be placed near the edge of steps or cuts in the bearing soils. 12.0 FLOOR SUPPORT If crawl space floors arc used, an impervious moisture barrier should be provided above the soil surface within the crawl space. Slab-on-grade floors may be used over medium dense to very dense native soils, or over structural fill placed as recommended in the Site Preparation and Structural Fill sections of this report. Slab-on-grade floors should be cast atop a minimum of 4 inches of pea gravel or washed crushed rock to act as a capillary break. The floors should also be protected from dampness by covering the capillary break layer with an impervious moisture barrier at least 10 mils in thickness. Floor slabs that are supported by site soils prepared in accordance with the Site Preparation section of this report or by structural fill should experience V2 inch or less of settlement. 13.0 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS All footing walls, basement walls, and retaining walls should be provided with a drain at the footing elevation. Drains should consist of rigid, perforated, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe surrounded by washed pea gravel. The level of the perforations in the pipe should be set at the bottom of the footing at all locations and the drain collectors should be constructed with sufficient gradient to allow gravity discharge away from the buildings. In addition, all foundation walls taller than 3 feet should be lined with a minimum 12-inch-thick washed gravel blanket provided to within I foot of finish grade that ties into the footing drain. Roof and surface runoff should not discharge into the footing drain system but should be handled by a separate, rigid, tightline drain. In planning, exterior grades adjacent to foundations should be sloped downward away from the structures to achieve surface drainage. These recommendations apply to conventional shallow foundation walls and landscape walls less than about 4 feet tall. One should refer to the following section for walls up to 12 feet tall . Janullry 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGB/s,, -KF.04710A2 -Pro)m~\2()(/4710\KE\WP Page 13 • e • Martin Property King County. Washing/on Subsuiface Exploralion, Geologic Hazard. and Preliminary Gemechnica/ Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations 14.0 CAST-IN-PLACE RETAINING WALLS AND BASEMENT WALLS All backfill behind foundation walls or around foundation units should be placed as per our reconunendations for structural fill and as described in this section of the report. Horizontally backfilled walls, which are free to yield laterally at least 0.1 percent of their height, may be designed using an equivalent fluid equal to 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). Fully restrained, horizontally backfilled rigid walls that callllot yield should be designed for an equivalent fluid of 50 pcf. Walls wi_th sloping backfill up to a maximum gradient of 2H: IV should be designed using an equivalent fluid of 55 pcf for yielding conditions or 75 pcf for fully restrained conditions. If parking areas are adjacent to walls, a surcharge equivalent to 2 feet of soil should be added to the wall height in determining lateral design forces. As required by the 2003 !BC, retaining wall design should include a seismic surcharge pressure in addition to the equivalent fluid pressures presented above. Considering the site soils and the recommended wall backfill materials, we reconunend a seismic surcharge pressure of 4H and 8H psf where H is the wall height in feet, for the "active" and "at-rest" loading conditions, respectfully. The seismic surcharge should be modeled as a rectangular distribution with the resultant applied at the midpoint of the wall. The lateral pressures presented above are based on the conditions of a uniform backfill consisting of excavated on-site soils, or imported structural fill compacted to 90 percent of ASTM:D-1557. A higher degree of compaction is not recommended as this will increase the pressure acting on the walls. A lower compaction may result in settlement of the slab-on-grade or other structures supported above the walls. Thus, the compaction level is critical and must be tested by our firm during placement. Surcharges from adjacent footings or heavy construction equipment must be added to the above values. Perimeter footing drains should be provided for all retaining walls as discussed under the section on Drainage Considerations. It is imperative that proper drainage be provided so that hydrostatic pressures do not develop against the walls. This would involve installation of a minimum I-foot-wide blanket drain to within 1 foot of finish grade for the full wall height using imported, washed gravel against the walls. 14.1 Passive Resistance and Friction Factors Lateral loads can be resisted by friction between the foundation and the natural glacial soils or supporting structural fill soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the buried portions of the foundations. The foundations must be backfilled with structural fill compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density to achieve the passive resistance provided below. We recommend the following design parameters: January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED DIRTH SCIENCES, INC. SGB!rn -KE047J0'12 -Projccts\2004710\Kf.lWP Page 14 • • • Martin Property King County, Washington • Passive equivalent fluid = 250 pcf • Coefficient of friction = 0.35 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations The above values are allowable and include a safety factor of at least 1.5. 15.0 PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS The pavement for this pr~ject is expected to be supported by medium dense, silty san.d (lodgement till), recompacted, inorganic weathered soils, or structural fill soils. These soils should be suitable, with proper preparation, to allow the use of standard paving sections. Because some of the site soils were substantially above optimum moisture content at the time of our exploration program, remedial subgrade preparation might he required below the paving. RC'!medial preparation measures could include removal of some of the existing site soils below the planned pavement section and restoring the planned subgrade elevation with select imported structural fill, treating the native soil subgrade with Portland cement to stabilize the wet soils, or aeration and drying of existing soils prior to compaction of the road subgrades. We recommend that the final determination of how to prepare the road subgrades be made at the time of construction when weather and field conditions are known. The King County standard paving section for residential access streets is 2 inches of Class B asphalt concrete paving (ACP) above 3 inches of A TB above 6 inches of gravel borrow. All depths given are compacted depths. All paving materials, base course materials, and placement procedures should comply with suitable standard specifications such as the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction or other suitable specifications. All structural fill and all native subgrades less than 4 feet below finished grade for a planned roadway should be compacted to 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density as determined by ASTM:D-1557. Prior to structural fill placement or to placement of base course materials over native subgrades, the area should be proof-rolled under the observation of AESI with a loaded dump truck or other suitable equipment to identify any soft or yielding areas. Any soft or yielding areas should be repaired prior to continuing work. If desired, ATB can be used to provide a construction working surface. After the buried utilities are in place, the subgrade is prepared, the gravel borrow is placed, and the A TB is laid and compacted. This ATB surface is then used for construction access, and once most of the heavy construction traffic has subsided, any damaged pavement areas are repaired prior to final surfacing with A CP . January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. SGBl.m -Kl047J0,12 -Pmjrcul2(}{)4710\KF.\WP Page 15 • • • Martin Property King County, Washington Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geoteclmical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations 16.0 PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MONITORING At the time of this report, site grading, lot layouts, structural plans, and construction methods have not been finalized, and the recommendations presented herein are preliminary. We are available to provide additional geotechnical consultation as the project design develops and possibly changes from that upon which this report is based. We recommend that AESI perform a geotechnical review of the plans prior to final design completion. In this way, our earthwork and foundation recommendations may be properly interpreted and implemented in the design. We are also available to provide geotechnical engineering and monitoring services during construction. The integrity of the foundations for buildings and of new pavement depends on proper site preparation and construction procedures. In addition, engineering decisions may have to be made in the field in the event that variations in subsurface conditions become apparent. Construction monitoring services are not part of the current scope of work. If these services are desired, please let us know and we will prepare a cost proposal. We have enjoyed working with you on this study and are confident that these recommendations will aid in the successful completion of your projeqt. If you should have any questions or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. · Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Kirkland, Washington g~~~ Susan G. Beckham, P.E. Project Engineer Attachments: Figure 1: Figure 2: Appendix: January 2 7. 2005 Vicinity Map Site and Exploration Plan Exploration Logs Laboratory Test Results SGB/sn -KE04710A2 -Projecis\20047/0IKE\WI' I ll(PIAll 11120, Ci!o Kurt D. Merriman, P.E. Principal Engineer ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. Page 16 "' « w !2 0 0:: 0 ;:: ::, w g w (.') w ...J ~ z< « u: "' () 0 ci VJ 0 z z ...; 0 0:: a. u K:J C ,; ~ u ~ C • u "' .c m ~ ~ ~ w "' ~ • ~ ~ u 0 M rm ~ < , __ '••"-" M ·~~"-'""'"' ...... 0 0 N ci z C 0 -0 ID C .I§ !I! ID > ID in 0 0 N ci z 0 ID 0 m " 0. ID 0 :;; -" "" ~ ' 0 '5 (/) u ID C -~ ('.) ,;, C 0 ~ ~ u. ID ~ ~ 0 ID OU) a.,, Welt-graded gravel and GW gravel witl1 sand, little to no fines GP Terms Describing Densit)'. Relative Density and Consistency Coarse- Grained Sons Very Loose Loose Medium Dense Dense SPT121 blows/foot O to4 410 10 10 10 30 30 Jo 50 Test Symbols Poorly-graded gravel and gravel witt, sand, little to no fines -ci ~Zr~~*-+----------~ g 6 .. 0 .. 0 Very Dense Consistency Very Soft Soft >50 SPT<21blows/foot Oto2 G = Grain Size M = Moisture Content A = Atterberg Limils C = Chemical ~~e £ -~ ID J9 Silty gravel and silty GM gravel with sand Fine- Grained Soils 2 to4 OD = Dry Densily 4 to8 ~ ID ~OC~IB~*-+------------~ Medium Stiff Stitt K = Permeabilily 810 15 m -0 C " U) m /JI 0 "' C m " ,-.c " --m Om -0 ID C .J ro :::: m E ~J u, n ·5 <T ::; Clayey gravel and GC clayey gravel with sand Well-graded sand and sw sand with gravel, little to no lines SP SM CL Poorly-graded sand and sand with gravel, little to no fines Silly sand and silty sand with gravel Clayey sand and clayey sand with gravel Silt, sandy silt, gravelly silt, silt with sand or gravel Clay ol low to medium plasticity; silty, sandy, or gravelly clay, lean clay Organic clay or silt al low OL plasticity Very Stitt Hard 15 to 30 >30 Descriptive Term Boulders Component Definitions Size Range and Sieve Number Larger than 12· Cobbles Gravel Coarse Gr~vel Fine Gravel Sand Coarse Sand Medium Sand Fine Sand S~I and Clay 3"1012" 3' lo No. 4 (4.75 mm) 3" lo 3/4" 3/4" \o No. 4 (4. 75 mm) No. 4 (4.75 mm) lo No. 200 (0.075 mm) No. 4 (4.75 mm) to No. 10 (2.00 mm) No. 1 o (2.00 mm) to No. 40 (0.425 mm) No. 40 {0.425 mm) to No. 200 (0.075 mm) Smaller lhan No. 200 (0.075 mm) {J) Estimated Percentage Moisture Content Dry . Absence of moisture, Component Percentage by Weight <5 Trace Few Lillie With 5 to 10 15 lo 25 • Non-primary coarse constituents: ~ 15% • Fines content between 5% and 15% du sly, dry to the touch Slightly Moist -Perceptible moislure Moist -Damp but no v·1sible waler Very Moist -Water visible bul not free draining Wet· Visible free water, usually from below wa\ec table Symbols Sampler Type Blows/6. 01 portion of 6" Cement grout surface seal Elastic silt, clayey silt, silt 2_0• 00 MH with micaceous or Split·Spoon I • " • Sampler Type Description Bentonite seal diatomaceous fine sand or Sampler ,'J---t's:cil.,_t -:-,-;--;--:---::--::-----J (SPT) Clay of high plasticity, CH sandy or gravelly clay, fat Bulk sample clay with sand or gravel ~fM~-+-------------f Grab Sample 3.0" OD Split -Spoon Sampler 3.25" OD Split·.Spoon Ring Sampler 3.0" OD Thin-Wall Tube Sampler (including Shelby tube) :: Filler pack wilh :·: blank casing ::· section ·.-Screened casing :-· or Hydratip ·_. with lilte, pack •. Endcap C iI. f/ff// Organic clay or silt of o Portion not recovered /f{// !-;;.,--·----=:.......-------------··-----------; {fffff OH medium to high <1l Percentage by dry weight 1/f!f plasticity (21 (SPT) Standard Penetration Test l--'-----f/'$.{4--t----------1 (ASTM 0-1586) ( 4l Depth or ground waler !. ATD = At time of drilling 'SJ.. Static water level (dale) ~ -~ VJ Peat. muck and other t3J In General Accordance with i e> ~ PT highly organic soils Standard Practice ror Description I O and Identification of Soils {ASTM 0-2488) (SJ Combined USC$ symbols used for lines between 5% and 15% Classifications of so\ls in this report are based on visual field and/or laboratory observations, which include density/consistency, moisture condition, grain size, and plasticity eslimates and should not be construed lo imply field or laboratory testing unless presented herein. Visual-manual and/or laboratory classification melhods of ASTM 0-2487 and 0-2488 were used as an identification guide for the Unified Soil Classification System. f =====================:::::===-~============================ t Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. l~~~[!la Exploratioti Log Key FIGURE A-1 • • g 5 "-w 0 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-1 -------------- This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION ---,-so-d~a-ndTopsoil grading to loose, moist, dark brown, silty SAND, with gravel roots, cobbles and ___ _ 1 2 3 4 -- 5 6 7 8 abundant organics. TIii Medium dense, moist, gray mottled, silty SAND, with gravel, cobbles, trace boulders. Dense at 3', lightly cemented and no longer mottled. 9 ·· Very dense below 9'. 10 --------- 11 12 - 13 - 14 15 16 17 18 - 19 Bottom of exploration pit at depth 1 O feet No ground water. No caving. ~ -----20--------------------------------· ---··---·--· .; • ~ Logged by: SGB Approved by: Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc.· ~i!~~~ Project No. KE0471 OA 1/12/05 • • g t " 0 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-2 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read togetlier with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the lime of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplficalion of actual conditions encountered. . DESCRIPTION -----Sod and Topsoil -----------------------------=~~-=~-------1 Weathered Till Loose, moist, brown, silty SAND, with gravel, roots and organics. 2 ----------------------Till 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 - 10 - 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Medium dense, moist, slightly mottled gray, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. Dense below 4' and lightly cemented, few boulders. Sandier below 8' . Bottom of exploration pit at depth 11 feet Slow seepage from north at 5'. No caving. ~-·-20-------------------------------------------• I o? "' t ~ 0 M ~ " Logged by: SGB Approved by: Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~ljj~ Project No. KE04710A 1112/05 • 1 2 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-3 -------------------T-~ This log ls part of the report rrepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AES!) for the named project and should be read together with that repor for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface condilions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil Weathered Till Loose, moist, brown and dark brown, silty SAND, with gravel roots and organics. ------------Till Medium dense, moist, gray mottled, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles_ 3 -- 4 5 - 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 17 18 - 19 Dense at 4' and weakly cemented. Very dense below 8'. Bottom of exploration pit at depth 8 feet No ground water. No caving. ~----20-------------------------------------------------------------·~ I Logged by: SGB Approved by: Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. m~~~~ Project No. KE04710A 1/12/05 • • LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-4 ·----------------------------------------~-·~ g E a. <l) 0 1 2 - 3 .. 4 5 6 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil Weathered Till ---------------- Loose to medium dense, moist, brown, silty SAND, with gravel roots and few pockets of organics and wood. Till Medium dense to dense, very moist, gray, silty SAND, with gravel, cobbles. 7 ---·--·---·-·· --·-------------·--------·-·--·-·--·--· ------ 8 - 9 10 - 11 - 12 13 - 14 - 15 16 17 18 19 Bottom of exploration pit at depth 7 feet Moderate seepage at 3'. Slight caving 2· to 3' . ~ -··-20-·--·--·-·--·-··--··---·-·· --·--···-----····----------------------··-----·-··-.; ~ ~ o? " ~ Logged by: SGB i g Approved by: Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~~~ Project No. KE0471 OA 1/12/05 e • g £ Q. " a 2 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-5 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AES!) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this lrench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION SodandTopsoil -··---· ---· ------·--·-----Weathered Till - Loose to medium dense, moist, brown, silty SAND, with gravel, trace roots and pockets of organics and wood. 3 ---·-----·---··-----.. --··-·--·-· Till 4 - 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 - 16 17 18 19 ... Medium dense, moist, gray mottled, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. Dense below 4', weakly cemented. Very dense and moderately cemented below 6'. Bottom of exploration pit at depth 7 feet No ground water. No caving . ~----20-·-·--··--··-···-·-··----... -·--·"-··----·---··-·------·----··-·-.. -·-··· -~ r. ~ n'. " ~ ~ g Logged by: SGB Approved by: Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~~01 Project No. KE0471 OA 1/12/05 • • g .c C. ~ 0 1 2 3 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-6 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurlace conditions may change at lhis location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil -· ----Weathered Till · · ------ Loose, moist, dark brown and brown, silty SAND, with gravel and roots and organics. ---------------------------Till ------------------------- 4 -Medium dense, moist, gray, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. Dense at 4', few boulders, sandier with depth. 5 6 7 8 -Very dense below 8' . 9 - 10 11 12 13 14 15 - 16 17 18 · 19 Bottom of exploration pit at depth 11 feet Slow seepage at 3.5'. No caving. Logged by: SGB Approved by: Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~~~ Project No. KE0471 OA 1/12/05 • g . ii ~ " 0 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-7 ----·--·---------------· -----·-----------·--------- This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION ------------·---··--·------~S-od and Topsoil · • -C 'l , a " ~ g ~ a ~ 1 Weathered Till 2 3 Loose to medium dense, moist, brown and dark brown, silty SAND, with gravel roots and organics. --····-··----------··----Till ·-·---- Medium dense to dense, moist, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. 4 - 5 6 -Strongly cemented and very dense below 6'. 7 8 9 10 -· 11 12 13 14 - 15 16 17 18 19 Bottom of exploration pit at depth 8 feet No ground water. No caving. . --2-0· -·-·--------------------···----····--·--·-·-·----· ·-· --·--··-··--------· Logged by: SGB Approved by: Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~lfflri~ Project No. KE0471 OA 1/12/05 • • g 5 a. " 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-8 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, lnC.·(AES1) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION · Sod and Topsoil · -·-----·---·····----------··--· Till. -. -.. Medium dense, moist, brown grading to gray, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. Dense and lightly cemented below 3'. Very dense below 6'. 8 ··-·------------·--··-------·---------------------- 9 10 - 11 12 13 14 15 16 - 17 18 - 19 Bottom of exploration pit at depth 8 feet No ground water. No caving. ~--20---------------------------· ---·--···---··--·-·-·· ·---·----·--·--·--·---• e ~ ~ ~ < 0 ;.: t M ~ ~ Logged by: SGB Approved by: Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~~~ Project No. KE04710A 1/12/05 • • g £ g. D 1 2 3 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-9 ----------····---------------··--------------·---------· This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the localion of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurlace conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil _________________ ,_. -----··-·-------·---------------------------------------- Medium dense to dense, very moist, gray, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. 4 --Mottled and medium dense to 4'. Dense below 4'_ 5 -Trace boulders, very dense below 5'. 6 7 -----·-------···------··----·--------------------··------····--··- 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 - 17 18 -· 19 Bottom of exploration pit at depth 7 feet Slow seepage at 3'5" from south. Slight caving 2' to 5' . ~---2B---------------·-----------------·------------··-----------·-·--··-·-• g -"i ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ Logged by: SGB Approved by: Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~~~ Project No. KE0471 OA 1/12/05 Associated •. -Date Sampled 12-Jan-05 Tested By KWL Earth Sciences, Inc. Project Project No. Martin Property KE04710A Location EB/EP No. Eps Depth Proctor Analysis ASTM D1557, D698 Soil Description Light brown silty SAND with gravel I Percent eassing 3/4" siev~: 83% ASTM D1557 Method C _J Automatic Tamper i • A B C D E F G H J K M N 0 z Mold Number 1 2 3 Remarks Water Added field dry dry Wt. of Wet Soil + 24.420 24.760 24.500 Mold llb\ - Wt. of Mold (lb) 14.090 14.090 14.090 Wt. of Wet Soil (lb) 10.330 10.670 10.410 - Wet Density, (pc!) 137.733 142.267 138 800 Wt. of Pan (lb) 0.735 0.735 0.660 ---Wt. of Wet Soil + 11 075 11. 925 11.125 Pan llb\ Wt. of Dry Soil + 9.865 10.920 10.420 Pan llb\ Wt. of Water (lb) 1.210 1.005 0.705 Wt. of Dry Soil (lb) 9.130 10.185 9.760 Moisture Content 13.3 9.9 7.2 '%\ Dry Density (pc!) 121.6 129.5 129.4 For a 6 inch mold: Z = 0.075 For a 4" mold: Z = 0.0333 Test Results: 1350 ---·----"-·---·-·--· ·----· ------- Optimum Moisture Percentage: Maximum Drv Densitv: -- 8.5 130.0 1400 ~---~--·~·····------··-·-··-·--··· ····-···---··-· 1300 --------..Le--··-1-------------····-,;. ~ f".... l ~ :~~~ ~ ~f-~~","·~-------1.· =-;=; Correction for oversize: ASTM 04718 Corrected Moisture Percentage: 7.0 Corrected Maximum Drv Densitv: 135.4 Assumed Specific Gravity: 2. 7 • 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 moisture content, % ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC . 911 Fifth Ave., Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98033 425-827-7701 FAX 425-827-5424 . . ssociated Earth Sciences, Inc . Moisture Content ASTM D 2216 r te Sampled Project Project No.· Soil Description 1. , 2/2005 Martin Pro ert KE04710A rested By Location EB/EP No. Depth f >T EP's --------~-----------~----~------'-------------' ;ample ID. EP-1 @3' EP-2@3.5' EP-3@3' ,t Weight+ Pan 2316 1730 1896 y Weight+ Pan 2057 1542 1662 'Veight of Pan 227 221 223 ,ight of Moisture 259 188 234 "y Weight of Soil 1830 1321 1439 ~ Moisture 14.2 14.2 16.3 A;('A ~J.s.,J '"mple ID EP-4@3' EP-5@3' EP-6 ,t Weight+ Pan 1515 1256 1498 lry Weight+ Pan 1355 1080 1278 ·,i-fPan 215 223 220 ,i f Moisture 160 176 220 1ry Weight of Soil 1140 857 1058 Moisture 14.0 20.5 20.8 :mplelD EP-6@4' EP-7@3.5' EP-8@3' ,et Weight+ Pan 1528 1706 1510 ry Weight+ Pan 1400 1537 1336 eight of Pan 226 221 221 reight of Moisture 128 169 174 --y Weight of Soil 1174 1316 1115 Moisture 10.9 12.8 15.6 ,mple ID EP-9@2.5' et Weight+ Pan 1502 ry Weight + Pan 1300 eight of Pan 202 eight of Moisture 202 y Weight of Soil 1098 Moisture 18.4 --e ASSOC/A TED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. 911 5th Ave, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98033 425,827-7701 FAX 425-827-5424 --------------------------------------- 3.2.2 KCRTS/RUNOFF FILES METHOD-GENERA TING TIME SERIES • . TABLE 3.2.2.B EQUIV ALEN CE BETWEEN scs soiL TYPES AND KCRts soit.: ·r.YPES . . . ', . . .. . . . SCS Soil Type scs KCRTS Soil Notes Hydrologic Group Soil Group . -Alderwood (AgB, AgC, AgD) C Till Arents, Alderwood Material (AmB, AmC) C Till Arents, Everett Material (An) B Outwash 1 Beausite (BeC, BeD. BeF) C Till 2 Bellingham (Bh) D Till 3 Brisco! (Br) D Till 3 Buckley (Bu) D Till 4 Earlmont (Ea) D Till 3 Edgewick (Ed) C Till 3 Everett (EvB, EvC, EvD, EwC) A/B Outwash 1 Indianola (lnC, lnA, lnD) A Outwash 1 Kitsap (KpB, KpC, KpD) C Till Klaus (KsC) C Outwash 1 Neilton (NeC) A Outwash 1 Newberg (Ng) B Till 3 Nooksack (Nk) C Till 3 Norma (No) D Till 3 Orcas (Or) D Wetland • Oridia (Os) D Till 3 Ovall (OvC, OvD, OvF) C Till 2 Pilchuck /Pc) C Till 3 Puget /Pu) D Till 3 Puyallup (Pv\ B Till 3 Raqnar (RaC, RaD, RaC, RaE\ B Outwash 1 Renton (Re) D Till 3 Salal (Sa) C Till 3 Sammamish (Sh) D Till 3 Seattle (Sk) D Wetland Shalcar (Sm) D Till 3 Si (Sn) C Till 3 Snohomish (So, Sr) D Till 3 Sultan (Su) C Till 3 Tukwila (Tu) D Till 3 Woodinville (Wo) D Till 3 Notes: 1. Where outwash soils are saturated or underlain at shallow depth (<5 feet) by glacial till, they should be treated as till soils. 2. These are bedrock soils, but calibration of HSPF by King County DNRP shows bedrock soils to have similar hydrologic response to till soils. 3. These are alluvial soils, some of which are underlain by glacial till or have a seasonally high water table. In the absence of detailed study, these soils should be treated as till soils. 4. Buckley soils are formed on the low-permeability Osceola mudflow. Hydrologic response is assumed to be similar to that of till soils. ' • 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 1/24/2005 3-25 • • • TopoZone -The We b 's Topograph ic Map 0 0 .3 0 .6 0 .9 1.2 1.5 kfll 0 0 .2 0 .4 0 .6 0 .8 1 fll i Map center is UTM 10 563458E 5257030N (WGS84/NAD83) Renton quadrangle Proj ection is UTM Z one 10 NAD83 Datum M=18 .0% G=0.62 r: i ,, ,. ) hr, I- ' -I ~,,, ... ~. \'\ " r~------7; -. ··1 .. • ..... , ~ ''\\ \~ ,••J /jM)~·W ~ •• ~ I , .. :~ . ~ ~ ~:·. • . . ~ M __!l" .... :~ • H ~--.. :~~ \.·,, ~ ".~:: ~ < \ I r I \ ., .,,,. ... -~ .. , .. , .. .~ \. L..---:, .. -.. -,.~, ~ LOWER CEDAR RIVER BASIN Basin Boundary Subcatchment Boundary Co ll ection Point Stream 0299 Tributary Number e311s Proposed Project 0 2 M iles • """I N \ + ~ ~ ~--=-----~~~£ ~ ( \ -.... ' / \ '\. ' I } t·A! I ~ c:::: m ~ ~ t I .~ I- ii' ::- ~ l ' ~ • ~ r::,(_ 0 i :lo! -Vl A Ul ~ -..::.; • • OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM Tf.BLE Surface Water Design Manual, Core Requirement #2 Basin: LOWER CE't>I\R. l<I\/ER Subbasin Name: CSDAR RIVER.. Symbol Drainage Drainage Component Slope Distance · Existing Potential Component Type Description from site Problems Problems Name, Size discharge Type: sheet, swale, constrictions, under capacity, ponding see map stream, channel. pipe, drainage basin, vegetation, % 1/4 mi= 1320 ft overtopping, flooding.habitat or organism pond; Size: diameter, cover, depth, type of sensitive destruction, scouring, bank sloughing, suliace area area, volume sedimentation, incision, other erosion A DITC..H x.z~ ON SITE e· D1i"CH ~2% Ot-l SITE- C. t> liLl-1 ::2z ION$ 1-rE \) Fl<ENO-\ DR.A.IN 2D' e:: GI-IA_tv"\l<OL.~ POND ~540 I F C v{ L \Je 'j2:."i" \20'-42'' l,(Nt;,eR ,zs"T\\ Alie SE 7!z% ?;;0B0 1 G Dt Tc.1-t (2-3'~) e£1-\1ND 14-+1 s SE. •78i" sr ,;:_60? I C:..ULVE:RT -?,"-V-l'B'' H 71,% -:::qoo/ 'Z.•c I l?tv'\~la £o: N Of I:: 1-IT"R "'-14Gc ,o ~ /100 I OVe.RF-1 """ ,1 €'.>KT-LIN Ea T SIENNA. 3b" Tl E:, \-111-1 NEc}) '71z% ~ 132'.0 1-t- B'\/l"A55 S'IST~N K I) ITC-H c~1N1:, ~-..., rrv " ;:;:2100+-1-'i4r" TD 142'"1>AIJE5J I-C:£AL11eRT l,lNDE; R. ~3400,-SE? I -=,1-TH S, M 7kf\5H RACK 4211 Cl,/L\/Eck'.1 70 734{:o '-t- A"11'\ OUTL.£1 MAPL-f;:Wonn CRE~I ·' Triad Associates • Subbasin Number: Observations of field inspector resource reviewer, or resident tributary area, likelihood of problem, overflow pathways, potential impacts. :,. " \D "<1" ..... SE~ 14 2ND w V') .._,. p L -' SE ~ 143 Cl. RD ~ ST PL "<1" ..... V') ...J ~ ~ ...J t FA I RWOOIJ ~ Si .. M .... .<v w SE V) 140TH PL ~, STt;;I SE 142 ND LI./ ::t: @ ~_.J V') I-~ .:!;O.. -' ,....._ Cl. "q" ~ i= -\D V ..... + N 65( ..... [j 5 (./') rn rn r .. --1,omplalnt Status Problem Type Rec Date PADD PADD 1 PADD PIN ... ~ ... 995-0104 CLOSED H20LEVEL C Tue Jan 311995 12050 148TH AVE SE 1123059087 I 1995-0472 CLOSED RUNOFF C Tue May 23 995 14007 144TH AVE SE 1523059125 2 -1995-0472 CLOSED RUNOFF RN T.ue May 30 1995 14007 144TH AVE SE 1523059125 / 1995-0763 CLOSED VACATION C Mon Sep 4 1995 14010 134TH ST 6928000310 ....... 1995-0786 CLOSED DISCHARG C Thu Sep 21 1995 14328 128TH ST 1023059035 s _.; 1995-0991 CLOSED DUMPING WQC Mon Nov 20 1995 12516 142ND AVE SE 1023059281 ./ 1996-0157 CLOSED DIGGING C Tue Feb 6 1996 12227 148TH AVE SE 1023059022 7 1 1996-0323 CLOSED WETLAND C Tue Feb 6 1996 12227 148TH AVE SE 1023059022 1996-0880 OPEN EROSION WQC Thu Apr 4 1996 14328 126TH ST 1023059035 "'l _.. 1996-1401 CLOSED FLOG C Sun Jul 211998 128TH & 142ND A SE 1523059039 I ./ 1996-1771 CLOSED RUNOFF C Thu0ct10 1996 12227 148TH AVE SE 1023059022 I/ ,,-uu.J5 CLOSED FLOG C Wed Jan 1 1997 14105 133RD ST 6928000210 I . CLOSED FLOG NOA Wed Jan 29 1997 14105 133RD ST 6928000210 I CLOSED FLOG R Sun J8n 12 1997 14105 133RD ST 6928000210 \ -~997-0715 CLOSED RID FENC FCR Wed Apr 2 1997 13845 131ST ST 1523059223 \ s • IJ/v CLOSED DRAINAGE C Tue Sep 23 1997 14004 133RD ST 6928000160 19 ·' 1vLOSED DRAINAGE R Tue Sep 301997 14004 133RD ST 6928000160 I 1997-1380 CLOSED DRAINAGE C Tue Sep 23 1997 14005 133RD ST 6928000170 I r-J ~7-1625 OPEN BMP'S WQA tlle Dec 30 1997 14413 128TH ST 847100016 I ULUSEO POND FCR Sun Ja'n 4 1998 13907 149TH PL SE 1072030540 2 "' 0 - "LOSED DRAINAGE C Thu May 211998 14454 132ND ST 847100054 z. rc.LOSED DITCH FCR Tue Aug 4 1998 14000 142ND ST 1072030540 2 CLOSED WQI WQR MOn Aug 17 1998 13224 144TH AVE SE 847100073 z CLOSED WASHWATE wac Sun Aug 9 1998 13224 144TH AVE SE 847100073 z 1999-0015 CLOSED DRAINAGE R Tue Jan 5 1999 1401: 133RD ST 6928000180 2' CLOS""..., "' "0~ FCR Mon Mar 1 1999 14102 148TH PL SE 1072010510 2 tr 1999-0202 CLOSED DRAINAGE CL ' Sun Mar 7 1999 14004 133RD ST 6928000160 z -TIJ99-0609 CLO.::,t:.u CONSTRUC C, Mon Aug 16 1999 1460€ 136TH ST 847100100 2 -t1999-0625 CLOSED STNDH20 c· Sun Aug 22·1~99 13741 148TH PL SE 1072030440 z. .... 2000-0597 CLOSED DCA C Mon Aug 28 2000 14101 132ND ST' 1523059217 -if000-0763 CLOSED MNM FCR Mon No.v. 20 2000 14004 133RD ST 6928000160 3 .. DOM FCR Mon Jan· 22 2001 14005 149TH PL SE 1072030540 "' ( 2001·0697 OPEN -DOM C Tue Nov 1 :i 2001 13309 146THAVE SE 847100077 B LOSED MMF FCR . Wed Dec 12 2001 14005 149TH PL 1072030540 '3 ".n CLOSED MMF R Sun Dec 23 2001 1400 149TH PL 1072030540 3 ( 2002-0126 CLOSED ., Wed.Feb 20 ·200? 14012 133RD ST 6928000150 . Mon Aug 2002 14019 145TH AVE se 5104200520 3 3002 OGOO CLOSED woo WQR Thu Sep 5 2002 14019 145TH AVE se 5104200520 CLOSED MNM FCR Tue Feb 4 2003 14.005 149TH PL se 1072030540 C 2003-0359 o:LOSED woo wac Sun May 18 2003 14001 149TH PL so 1072030540 r4. 2003-0359 / OPEN WOD WQE Wed May 21 2003 14005 149TH PL •• 1072030540 H ?00'·°""5 CLOSED MNM FCR Tue Nov 18 2003 14920 139TH PL 1072030540 • -Page I of I .. J e e e Torkelson, Cindy From: Sent: To: Cc: Rebecca Cushman [rcushman@TriadAssoc.com] Tuesday, August 16, 2005 1:54 PM Torkelson, Cindy Kristen Anderson Subject: drainage complaints Attachments: consolidated list 8_ 16_05xls.xls Cindy, How have you been? I have not talked to you in some time. I have another new project that we are doing a downstream analysis on. Enclosed is the list of complaints off of I- map that I determined may be downstream of the site: Would you· please pull these complaints and send them to me? Please let me know an estimated time frame. Thanks much! Hope your summer is going well. Sincerely, Rebecca Cushman, PE I Project Engineer Triad Associates· 12112 115th Ave NE > > New Address Kirk!an{J, WA 98034 P: 425.821.8448 F: 425.821.3481 E: r.cushrnan@triadassoc.com W: www.trladaSSQ.!;.COm Cor11111emcm1tlng 30 years of land development consulting 08/16/2005 • King County Water and Land Resources (WLR) Division 20 I S Jackson St, Suite 600 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 FAX Fax: -------------Phone: ------------ Number of pages including cover sheet: --- From: Cindy Torkelson WLR Stormwater Services Section Phone:206~296-1900 Fax Number: 206-296-0192 IMPORTANT LEVEL 1 ANALYSIS NOTE:, We do not.send copies of certain complaint types that are not relevant such a~.BCW, FI, FIR, FIH and WQA, and we do not send CL and LS types. See key below. Type SI, S2 and S3 will not be faxed due to size constraints.1 ~ ,. ,.., A O ,,I),,,.:_" .-, ,U.:C ~ J9qq -(JJ{};).. ... ?,..oO it--0 o-lO IN' ...... IJ(kWfMJ ' 99G -0 0 l'tli7-l/:;J6' ').C,6/-fX997 ,i-~3-0~'1 (1/LL o:td,l~ t The following is a list of complaint types received by the Water and Land Resources Storm water Services Section. Complaint numbers beginning prior to 1990-XXXX have been archived and are no longer in our possession. They can still be retrieved, if necessary, butwill take additional time and may not be beneficial to your research due to their age, development which bas occurred, etc. If you are interested in reviewing the actual complaints, they can be pulled (time permitting) for your review. Copies can be obtained for$ . 15 per page, and $2.00 per page for plans. Kevs: Type.of Investigation C Action Request BCW Business' for Clean Water CCF Response to Inquiry •CL Claim EH Enforcement on Hold ER Enforcement Review FCC,FCR,FCS Facility Complaints Fl SWM Fee Inquiry FIR SWM Fee Review FIB SWM Fee on Hold 'L<; RR NOA WQC WQE WQR WQA WQO SJ,S2,SN3 Lawsuit Facility Engineering Review Neighborhood Drainage Assistance Water Quality C9mplaint Water Quality Enforcement Water Quality Engineering Review Water Quality Audit Water Quality-Other Engineering Studies .Type of Problem DCA DOM DES OLE OTA INQ MMA MMF MMG MMM MNM 'MNW ,SWF. · WQB WQD WQ! REM NWD GRT Development/Construction Drainage -Mlscellaneous Drainage -Erosion/Sedimentation Drainage -Landslide/Earth Movement Drainage Technical Assistance Drainage-General Inquiry Maintennnce -Aesthetics Maintenance -Flooding Maintenance -General Maintenance -Mowing MIUntenance -Needs Maintenance Maintenance-Noxious Weeds SWM Fee Questions Water Quality-Best Management Practices Water Quality-Dumping Water Quality-Dlicit Connection SWM Fee -Remeasurement SWM Fee-Grant SWM Fee-New Discount •subject to Public Disclosure requirements I. Receipt of written request for documents 2. Review and approval by Prosecuting Attorney's office -KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION .REPORT ~by:f.J_. Received from: NAME: fh/mtgt/16f , /l/ q(1 ADDREss: /J.o5o l'z'B';., Av£ Location of problem, If different: Reported Problem: Page 1: INVESTIGATION REQUEST 114 ' Type_. _CZ..---'_ Date: z/1 /q 5 OK'd by: FIie No. 95-0104 l 1 ·-----'--~...C..--------1---- (Please print plainly for scanning). 5£ (Day) ] :.v . PHONE 2 7/-7/Z'f (Eve) f>.el&ER Jro-7~9/ State __ Zip, ___ _ /17,f. hblm<?u1'sr /s <!...e,ncerned abou.:r +he ,'ncreQse. in +he. v..:io.:rer +a.ble.. nea.r his lot, The lot di'rec+-ly S::,u.:H·, has ~ I o..Ke. f:orrni~ on. ; +, and +he. 'lac.an+ Lo+ be.hir,d h,m is So.:h--tra.+ed. c.OJ) we help rnR Hotrri~u.fsf w,'+h h!·.s ("le;· hbors : Who.+ a..re , Co(.).nfy rey<.<.lo.+-~ons en 9e+fec+i'n3 a.r,ei9hbors wo..+-er ;evel. ,;ac<VJ+ Lo+ -"'//23CJS 90(>5 otunul by l<ebu"+ AY"derso.J • Plat name: Other agencies Involved: :5L<J _I_I_ ~., 2_ ParcelNo.//2.30.5 9087 1/4 S T R .(Jo h.o~ ~1,t~ Afc....L.h,· .... 't. . L.,l;'~ M. ... ~.,,,, .11+, "'-per -1"> =ll z.~1.-14, 2-'f, 2·10, .2-~ Lot No: Block No: No Field Investigation Needed __ _ Krolle06w Th.Bros: New 627 A Old 35£'/ (O</ Basin H/fY Council Dist 12-Charge No: ____ _ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RESPONSE: Citizen notified on .1·/J·'l~-by L phone letter In person ~ C,o.\.lcJ_ /4.r J./o(,.,~,-.dl "*> t"k.(i,•"'t I,,,'..., -1\....t Sw-... &.o~k '/ 4........_ """Q"" V'C.~vk.\.,:c,~_,. c.--lo~~+· ":>"" .... .._J.~ " ...... 1::.0-"'c.i~J...1,...,. .,(.....,:.._ pu...1.;"f ,._.,.__ s .... ;.,L :r .....,.,~IJ. (.,~ f---:+ -;.y,...Jc..... ~ .... '-'' O\c,._-\,'o..,-:,. C.kc.:.lc-.0, °l}l}E,$ c--c-1 tl.._ "-'"'-•!Jh6r,r ./o -/l.. <:u;f t.,.....J. c.. 'O"c,.J..; u,l'.)(.,.-\.,0 "' -tc'=/ "-'<1>p,c.hs~ IZ-Z:'t, ?"-lov Ko" il>i«:>k. Cv-ll'<ll M• f.\c,l""-f.v,s-1 ll>={~ ...., .'fl. -f{..-.. ,,"');:. 3:) -/1-,os.t=.dl uf, :a,14-. Z-13 -'?~-'-.;,_J:.,..Jt-- DISPOSJTION: Turned to on by OR: No further action recommended because: Lead agency has been notified:--~------~-~~----~--~---~--- -Problem has been corrected. _ No problem has been Identified. Prior Investigation addresses problem: -See File# .rlvate problem -NDAP will not consider because: ------ -Water originates onslte and/or on neighboring parcel _ Location Is outside SWM Sej.,i,1""ea. DATE CLOSED:~ /S(,U .·~y: -.:.Li' L Other (Specify): (;,~Jift)~ , .. '/t11/&6 • • • Complaint #95--0104 Holmquist Investigated by Doug Dobkins ------- .. --.---· ·---····--_, .. .,. {I) Mr. Holmquist is concerned about the groundwater table around his house. Holmquist's neighbor to the south has standing water in the pasture/front yard (see picture ). The neighbor to the North of Holmquist has some standing water on his driveway area. This neighbor has a small V-<litch along the north property line of Holmquist that picks up surface flows and drains them to the roadside ditch. Area around the Holmquist property_ was damp on the day of investigation. I recommend that I contact Mr. Bolmquist to inform him that SWM doesn't have any programs or reguiations to deal with groundwater. 148111 A VE SE D •• -•• -... 'Y-Ofl'O{ -, OPSN f I-;--=-==-------, 1 --- ---------, ·KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT Page 1: INVESTIGATION 'REQUEST (?--!~) Type C.. .elved by: Date: 5/2'-I /"1S · OK'd by: File No. q 5-{)'-/ ?2. -Received from: Fm (Pleaso print plalnlyfor scanning). (Day) (Eve) NAME: __ _,:;_[_,._r..,..a-"'z"";e""'-, .... ,_.D""-"'a"'-11-'------'----------PHONE 2. 7 / -'12 79 , ADDRESS: /46() 7 · I 'i'i rJ-, f/VE 5£ Location of problem, ~ different: City f<.£AJTc,"1 State __ Zip ___ _ Reported Problem: Gces.s;vc rllnoPF r'Y?:>«1 s-t-rec.t-. Re.fer -fi:,. o.-1-tc,ched P tY1 C.OWJpla..; .-,+. Other agencies Involved: s£ -12._ 23 L Parcel No. 152305 9125 1/4 S T R Lot No: Block No: -~ · No.Field Investigation Needed __ _ Kroll 810 £ Th.Bros: New 65(, .T3 Old 3SPC. Basin k C..R Council Dist 12 Charge No: ____ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notified ori (>~1-~1by vphone_ letter _In person f.{9R--i<-"' t: · . _ -L J • _., .J..._,.(c,._ &.r .r. I l ' '°"'i ,-...._ v' Cwv(-,-.r ~ > DISPOSITION: OR: No further action recommended because Lead agency has been notified: . -Problem has been corrected. --...,.N.,...o-p-r""'ob...,.le-m-',-h"-as....,....be-e-n...,.ld~e-n-tifl-ed-. ----P-r-io-r .,...ln-ve_s_tl_ga-t~io_n_a-dd-r-es_s_e_s -pr-oblem: • ' -.-~~# _____ _ Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: Water originates onslte and/or on neighboring parcel -. Location is outside SWM Service Area. X .Other (Specfy): /Jleo//1~ -ra:.n< t«.J"/Sl;f, DATE CLOSED: _:I.._) _:j_/ 1 J · by:~ .WYJHOM. -- • . Detalls of Investigation: On site 5-25-95. KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT . . . Page 2: FJELD INVESTIGATION ,, -.· / ,J ~ The Frazier lot is a corner lot below road grade and lower than the lot to the south. Bordering roads are shoulder type without ditches. Run off is to the Frazier's gravelled driveway. Mr Frazier is not looking so much for County assistance as he is wanting to know what he can do on his own property to keep the water from ponding in the driveway. Photo 1) Looks across 144th at house (left) and garage. 2) Looks north on 144th from front of driveway. 3) Looks south in front of lot. 4) View west on 140th with Frazier lot on left. 5) Looks east on 140th with Frazier lot behind maple bush on right . • Sketch: • f + :..., ' Investigated by c:(ltj, /..4A4 ~ -~ , t ,... / Date ) -~ I -9 ~ --'--~--- • • • EMORANDUM DATE: 7, 1995 TO: file FROM: Gary-Paul Reinke Engineer,. DIR RE: File #95-0472 ( 95-0472B) CC: Brian Sleight, P.E Brian, This is similar to the Riordan file I just sent to you. I haven't filled out a score sheet prior to this but have included one with this. The letter and information has gone out. This compl.aint was a request for technical assistance, not for a fix. I feel we can close this out right away.· I will pass along Tony Ledbettor's phone number to Mr. Frazier . Brian, I have talked to Mr. Frazier concerning his questions on this com.plaint just this last week. He is satisfied with our assistance at this time. He is planning some work in his yard first and if this does not stop the flooding· in the driveway he will contact Tony Led.bettor about what he might be able to do to stop the water in the right-of-way. I feel we can close this out at this time. Gary ------------------------------------------- --- KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT • Page 1: INVESTIGATION REQUEST Type U Re~~~-~-~'..~-----------------------------------------~~~~'. ___ 1_/_~/~2_ ____ ~:~-~~jj!}__----~~'.~--~~'._r::,_2_~--~l_k_?l__ Received from: {Please print plainly for scanning). (Day) (Eve) NAME:_--'='])c_;ljYl=-:_..:.cb"--r1J~--S_:__/<-=-:/_,_/ __ a_/._Pr_· _:ed. ______ PHONE ____ --- ADDRESS: / ,{ 0 / 0 S £ /3 'f --fn Sf. City /<-en-hrn State . Zip 'f&'.:)5: Location of problem, rt ditterent: { /JOY..fziinS ()f ('-/(} fh A1fe S £~ . . ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------:)------------------·------------· Reported Problem: · SE£. ~,-<:" A? y • Be-lore:.. ~'nucs.f-(5lc,--I-;~ I-.• ''~·3/ _,._,, l•u . . :<.oil ,f /() ~ cesint-CI<._ Council Dist. /2..,-Chscge No: ------------------------------------·---~~~--- RESPONSE: Cr.i2en notifi;,ci on Cf-22~7-'J.oy _ phone _ lener _ in person -Cle cketl :rZi.~ s~f-.Jo ~0/41,t,Cr--~~ ~ DISPOSITION: Turned to on by -----------OR: No fu.-1her action recommended becat Lead agency has been notified: ----'-,---~-~~-~~------=-,--,----,,--,----:-,-,-'---c.,-:-:-::-, --Problem has been corrected, No problem has been identified. Prior investigation addresses problE W-See File# _____ _ · _ Private problem -NOA? will not consider beceuse: _ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel _ Location_ i_s outside SWM Ser:::J}JJa. _ Other (Specify): DAT,: CLOSED: __f!!_J / 'J / J 5 by: _/lv /A/rt) /J/!.tJu/t?~ -·--··· ---------·------------..,..--------- • • • complaint 95-0763 Dembroski, Alfred investigated by Doug Dobkins on 9-18-95 Mr. Dembroski is requesting to vacate some ROW along 140th avenue SE. The area in question is unopened ROW and not maintained. The only drainage that I could find was at the end of SE 132nd avenue which crossed the 140th Ave. SE ROW from the west to the east. This is a 12"concrete pipe. No other pipes or drainage systems were found in this ROW. Drainage within the plat of Puget Colony Homes drains away from the 140th avenue southeast right-of-way to the southeast. On the westside of the 140th Ave se ROW there are 4 large parcels which have no drainage systems affected by this proposed vacation of ROW. Right of Way isn't improved for travel. · see attached drawing (+) KING COUNTY SURFACE WA1ER MANAGEMENT DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT (:}) ' ~6 -. Page 1: INVESTIGATION REQUEST Type ~c~~-~~-~'.-~-:® --------------· . Date:.: 1/.;:i;;i/q5_ OK'd by: -jt};-------~~~-~~;_1_?·~Z_fjfj_ Received from: (Please print plainly for scanning). (Day)~ /: 30 (Eve) NAME: v,;-q;n;cv -fJ?e, Gt.12oy PHONE ;256 -/34-2..·_. --- ADDRESS: ltf-328 SE=. 128--f'h City R-en-1-on 43 z-~!-:~ Zipqg(Jf:) Location of problem, ~ different: :ro h" Mt-r,1 lie . -------------·------------·------------------------------·-··------------------------------------------------·-····-··--------- Reported Problem: .-/YI/LS. v1Ylc.. f.l£()Y ~l?S pl't!PO'-A( cvv,/ j?-e;,.:/s ;/-{1Uf' 7b CU?d Eldu-lC( Lt:i...cll(, he-L tt)..e.1qh~rs n --(he_ f)e,vJ/h ho.ti /ftS-lt..l(~ ;;z. .l/" 'l)rv<rn pip-?~ wh11J.h disdicv-q-cs tn1-ld her prttp&hj. -1nU-f o1,uY1 A. d. o Cf 1::.u1 !7-l / M ti LJ;..k I l/ sh e.. h as 116-h c .e c<. P.. r-/1 m lf 5 t.A-b.!>; CrYn-/nq /i,t>m -the.-pip-t-. 5he. wovJd {,i)ce, -this k~kd -lo s~ tJhccl-1- 16, tJvl'1_ d /h7S,;; r bl lf Somt'..Ph /nq d O 11 e. ci-hrz,vf-. -th ; ~ rt Cl'h.J tm-h A~ pl11f ~1'1 '(Jie. f4p.e is wco.kd.. tJ...{c!Y7f th~ prffPU-l-4. !111-e. n,J /11~ Nvvf'h t:;1de., 1 ci:1-l3o /1-&m , i r, mi cl !JI<. 0 t ,::v, ce vth nd r;eeo Pr had:.. . · P/eas e tio nor ~../'ho-h.er 1<-01.:l-ee. , ~h-t. A~.s·. CMlt-eR-. ;/ 1.f{!Vl 11~ed lo lf{Jvt ca.n fr.J./ 9;,.e~. !he, Ee eoif • 511<-Ju..<; cf~p..;--e.tl f,wn(. ot: -tN Brush. o.-wCJ..1.f ~o '1/JtA. c~ s~~ i+ ~ . /1.,a? · 1,Je,iq?, bov llece.~nf!t.t Pu:f ~ boetrttl ~ve/2.. ripe· Le: /'Jo: 31ock No: ' -,~,!,,~ .. \~.:~. ,::·~t~/t ~ ... :_;t;: ~:,:r:.::~:.:.t ~ '"'.~.: .. ~ =~-:; ,~ = ~ __ qp t:\~.;~--~ -~o.':~ ~-};:.9t:'.! ~ ~:.:._;.fT. F:.5 9.~.5:~~·" .... ~.~~r.: ~-~:~: ~-~tt_j _;t .~:-~.::~.:: ~,:-~<~i?:-~.:1<.t-.~:-;, .5"!: ... lo 2.3 2-__ ~arcsi :,o. /tJ2.3tJ5 CftJ35 •.1-S T ;:, Kroll 805 £ ,h 3ros New & 6/p'J/ Old 3'5D'r Basin LC!<_ Cc~ncil Dist / 2.., Charge No: ----·----------------------------:_:____:._:===== DISPOSITION: Turned to on by -----------OR: No fur1her action recommended beec _ Lead agency has been notiiied: --,-,---,-,-~~-~~----------------Pro. blem has been corrected, _ No problem has been identified. Prior investigation addresses prob! W -See File# ____ _ _ ?//',ate problem -NOA? will not consider because: _ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel . _ Location i_s outside SWM ~ervice Are . DATE CLOSED: /0 I l!.---;9S by: ------,UO f"~-.6 _ Other (Specify): KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT • . . Page 1: INVESTIGATION REQUEST Type k.J4'~ Received by: J: l. ·----_____ -----------------------Date:. !// 2,/ / 13 _____ OK'd by: ---------------------File No. _(J':}-Q_CjC/_L Received from: • (Please print plainly for scannino). (Day) (Eve) (>'lob;/ NAME: N-elson, ,6/111 C::@jZpv PHONE :Z55-672Cf er q99-3,!Jc ADDRESS: /J6 / 6 ('(2,-d /lr!E SE City i<eafon State Zip98M • Location of problem, if diiferent: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reported Problem: • /l?/1?. Ale/Son~ l)eJ9hbor , S aca.1s,'n3 h i rY\ of d.wn p t ~ t'{fli rnal t.\.) a.:s +-e... nea.r -+he. dra.,n a..9e.. aJea., C.OJ'l u.'.)e__ c.~. DL.U CU"\d ci-i..e.uZ -for s,9 r.s of dWV1P·i"._1, a...ri.d +al K w h\ s f\.O..)~fiba : Lat No: 'l 31ack No 77~ Otha:-cgancias l;i-.,.otved: SE. 10 ~ 5 ?arcel No. /DZ 305 q?.g / s T ;; Basin LC/<_ Council Dist / <--Charge No: No i=iald lnvesiigstioi'I Needed Kroll --- ,h 3ros: New ft>5&,J" f Old 35 D~ --------------------------------------~---- RESPONSE: Chizen notiiied on by phone letter · in person --- DIS,POSITION: Turned to ___ on _____ by __ _ OR: No further action recommended beca, _ Lead agency has been notified: • Problem has been corrected, -;s__~-N-o-pr_o_b-le_m_h_a_s_b_e_e_n-io-· e-n-ti-fie-d-. -~---P-r-io-r-in_v_e-st~ig_a_tio-n-ad-a~· r-es'-s_e_s _p-roble See File #----'--- -Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: _ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel Location is outside SWM Service Area. _ Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED: [}, j Qj_j '7'5 by: -----11_}_1 ___ J_[, rfo (-eM /uc::;.v'T • ' • • Date: December I, 1995 Date of Investigation: November 30, 12995 FM: Gary-Paul Reinke RE: Evaluation for Complaint # 95-0991 · The Nelsons neighbor (McTies) is claiming they are dumping animal waste from their dogs and from their dog grooming business into a drain system which eventually empties on the McTies property. The · Nelsons have an easment through the neighboring property directly east of them. This neighbor raises dogs and has two horses on the property. I checked the Nelsons' drainage system (roof drains) and found them to be clear and clear. We walked to the outfall near the McTies property. Mr. Nelson's system ends in a dry well that has a rock wall on the side the water would empty on. Although it was raining hard at the time of the visit there was no moving water coming from the drywell. The pond on the McTies' property sits in the middle of a low spot, so water would collect there naturally. The health department was out receutly and did not find any evidence of animal waste from the Nelson system. This appears to be bad relations between the neighbors. I did not find any violations and closed the complaint onsite. I asked Mr. Nelson to send a sketch and history of his problem with the McTies for the file. He said he would send it in. Drain pipe Dog pens ( /;P) Ponded area Horse barn KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT - e Page 1: INVESTIGATION REQUEST Type c._. Re~-~:~~-~:::_:~ ~Q __________________________________ Date:-----2 J '-I '1 (p OK'd by:-~--------File( No. q_ro -_ I 5 _7 __ Received from: Ki ck:. T1'\ 0 Y\'\ \0 S.OiJ(Please print plainly for scanning). (Day) (Eve) NAME: __ _.!lc_l,.__,_N....:..:....'.A...........:W:..o.t....lc;,"--'l'---'to~I\J..,_ ___ --:-____ PHONE 2S>? -C:> 19 3=--- ADDR cSS: __ 1 _2_2_2_-=r..:...._..:...·..:...I Lj-'-=g-~_. -.:..:Jt\'Vc_c__::E.=--<;.=:...::.£._ City R t.NTl>N Starn Zip qi D';f .Location of problem, if different: Reported Problem: ":::,E.-E:_ #qt.J01'2..5 N~hbov bt(_cLhoe... • IS . . -~5:JlV\~ fN IS he.I~ ,e..v-ecl W*I~ .. Lo: No: 31oc~ No: (::"l'.:;1,it; t}~\ttit:tt:tt,t.:tf)i:?tt::t1t,Dttr:ttt1s;\.~·.~:::~.~'..\r::; .. :::,}.:.~~t}Ytf.9:tt .. s.Y::.USI/E:3 S:,~_.2.7::,;:,;i:.:_?I±~:.r) :::tt(t::tt: ::/"t_.:::txit:.r.1.t/t:,f:tt.t;tt 5 £:.. ·_!_Q_ '2-3 ':) ?a reel No. / 0 2. 3 0? q ()1-2-Kroll 80S e, ,h ':lros Me,: 02[p.J""i o:d ~2 774:: 3'-/-D1 s T -~- Basin t-.C/2.... Council Dist (p Ch~rge No: ? 2.:t_ t:-..1_ ______ ___________________ ----_-. _____ . __ · a D , RESPONSE: Crtizen notified on Z·2Sjc. by ,;r. phone_ lener _· in person · 1 le.cl--~ w +4=, '-'-'"'CJtJ .be_ ~-o,,4 +c ~.JO F· b~ Sito u~oW...:.... s-c.J A~ c.-c..Cf-'?'=, -+o ~'l::>es. ~ DISPOSITION: Turned to on by -----------OR: No fur1her action recornmer,ded bac: .,;s:. Le2d agency h2s been n·otified: .....=:lJ:....:...D'-c"'f:5=~-'G=·~='-'='-/:c::rV:,,:,..:,<;''=-~----=-c-~--,--,---,..,-'---. W-Problem h2s been corrected, · No problem has been identiiied. Prior investigation addresses prob See File # _____ _ _ Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: Water originates onsi(e and /or on neiohboring parcel = Location. i.s outside SWM Se#?~ _ Other (Specify): DATE: CLOSED: A'/ t:?2;..2/[ by: ,f'/7)!)~-:f"G/:?JG • SSOR complaint 96-0157 Walton, Tina Investigated by Doug Dobkins on 2-21-96 I met with Mr. Walton onsite to discuss his concerns with the work being done on the nursery property to the south. According to Mr. Walton the nursery has been clearing land that could be considered a wetland. I walked the back property line of Mr; Walton's property and discovered that he also has done some work in the wetland to install a fence. Mr. Walton cleared in the wetland and disturbed a small stream. I told Mr. Walton that he needs to talk to DDES Grading section about a permit to do this work and to stop work in the wetland. I tried to access the property of the nursery to the south but was unsuccessful because they were closed. The nursery appears to have encroached the wetland with its clearing. I suggest sending this complaint to DDES Grading section for their investigation . NE.10-23-5 ..:JC.. IU-c..j-!:) -----N.&e-1 S1W.------'-----SCALE 1• -I 00' ---- ~ ~ ti· <f,,.: ,, ~ ~ ~ ---·---" --+------------------------ ~,~ ,_,, .. (. • ! A @> <I' ~----+'-- • : ; ,_,,,44. ~ @) ~ : . ,t ! Z-''""'· '~ @) ~ --------'""-~-1· I ,. .... ·~ I • 0Y ~ ~ ----·-.-· • -------.= ... ---="'=··.c.' --- IJ•., '<1 ,o,...,, , •. ~ '"' ... ' • ; ~ ··1·. ,-.,., , •.. ·· . . KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION fr.,j_1--:-- . DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT l v J · /'rl .,.,.·,M ,d-, f Page 1: INVESTIGATION REQUEST .· . . Type . (2_. -· · l rrom c,<Vu I COP/,-{(lJI/ . · : .A A ,\.j eceived_ by: /(/c/(7lzofY?pSOfiotl,'ne) Date:. ?l.!/?<o _____ OK'd by: -~-vt:;j _____ File No. 9t-3d3 _ Received from: ., (Please print plainly for s.c.anning). (Day) (Eve) NAME: 77oa uJalton PHONE 8o;r0/93· _. --- ADDRESS: IJJ:17 -Wtn ll(!e st City. ~ State Zip 9,f'i?~ Location of problem, ~ different: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Reported Problem: . · · · .• · · , , , lile/9h6<Jr d,99//jJ !a <Yeetf eu/r/J had/Joe, She #)I/Jks 1/ 1.s a ;:>roleeled (Lleiland. ND fl-ID . • -, .... _,..,,__, ' , ,.::a ,,c.,,,c. Lo: No: 31ock No: t~o Field lr.vesiigstion Needed __ _ .8£. /0 :)3 5 i'arcel No. /0:C/JO/i -Wc!X? Kroll 80,51:.. ;;.:. S T ;; Basin@&(/ . I Council Dist / 2, Charge No: ------'' _ .. ______ .. RESPONSE: C~izen notified on by ---phone letter in person ,h.Sros: Me;,.0:17 fl 7 o:d 35-E/j DISPOSITION: Tu°rned to on by OR: No further action reco:nmer.ded bee, ----------- _ Lead agency has been notttied: Problem has been corrected, --~N-o_p_ro_,b~I e-m~ha_s_b~e-e_n...,io~· e-n-,tif-ie-d-. ----P~r~io-r~in-v-es-t~ig-at~io_n __ a-d'"'a-re-'-s-se_s_p-ro·bi ---· -See File# W Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: ------ -Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel Location is outside SWM Service Area. DATE CLOSED: _},_J~!i__! 'J(, by:~ O,her (Specify): SGi'tf" <Jt,..t!J/57 .......__ .. ~ KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION . ])CP DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT (io) ;-- Page 1: INVESTIGATION REQUEST Type _v __ Date: 7/z.2/q4, OK'd by: /)/Li4---FileNo.q6 _/.I/O/_ (Please print plainly for scanning}. (Day) 7~ "J/'6 (Eve) Received from: .eceived by: NAME\kJHes ~,Al,.,"'14:9 .. ~to~~ Hoo:si PHONE ,?77_ OS-3/ __ _ ADDRESS: ~o I /11€ ~.t,I, ith,ef.,.., Wit City State Zip ---------- Basin LC/?. Council Dist / Z.. Charge No:. ___ _ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RESPONSE: C~izen notified on ___ by _ phone _ letter _ in person DISPOSITION: Turned to ___ on ____ by __ _ OR: No further action recommended bec:c _ Lead agency has been notified:-----------~--~--------- Problem has been corrected. No problem has been identified. Prior Investigation addresses probi ----See File# ____ _ ~ Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: Water originates onslte and/or on neighboring parcel . = Location Is outside SWM Serv~e, ~'Ja. DATE CLOSED: _3__; '(' / _J_/f, by:-~---'--ff"J -;fft.f!,fetP _ Other (Specify): • • • TO: FROM: DATE: --..... o.:i..1.vM 30V--1l::lns -. ~'--' -..UNnoo 8Ni>l . -.. --.. --.--.. : KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT INTERNAL MEMORANDUM Don Althauser Larry Gettle August 7, 1996 (io) SUBJECT: James Montgomery -Amonte Florist 96-1401 ,--4801 NE 4th (142nd Avenue southeast arid southeast 128th Street) Per your request Local Drainage Services Unit inspected the drainage channel from the pipe outlet at southeast 128th street to the south Lobe of Wetland 1so. We also checked to determine if there are easements or agreements that require the county to maintain this off R/W channel. Our investigation revealed the channel south of southeast 128th street has been impacted with sediment, vegetation and debris. The channel invert appears to be higher than the culvert outlet. We determined at least 40 feet of channel dredging would be required to obtain positive.flow. FUrther downstream a significant amount of brush and trees are restricting the channel and causing additional sediment building • A check for easements at the Record Center and Property services Division did not identify any easements or agreements giving King County maintenance responsibility for this channel. Because we do not have maintenance responsibility this maintenance should be considered as part of the CIP project. Thanks for the opportunity to respond to your request. If you have any questions or need additional information please feel free'to call me at 6-8326. • • KING COUNlY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT. Page 1: INVESTIGATION 'REQUEST . Type (! . aed by: L.6"~ Date: /t1/J 7,H6 . OK'd by:. =ft!/ FIie No. 7t'-r/ ..... n-=-I- -Received from: 't)AllcF ~u.i:L..A-n. •c 1-t lease print plalnlyfor scanning). · (Day) (Eve) NAME: J'o tf N ( \,\si,e., 1 (9-<.1 Z LA-R. fl!,,!( PHONE 54-Cf 7 00~---- ADDRESS: I Z. 2 2 7 . \ 4 B ftl t{; €" S' <= City \<e1'.l-n, "-1 State t,J ft Zip 'z fas-5 Location of problem, If different: Plat-name: Other agencies Involved: 1/4~-T-FI Basin Parcel No. ---'--------- Council Dist --Charge No: 0/SPOSrTION: Turned to ' On · by ----------- Lot No: Block No: No.Field Investigation Needed_. __ Kroll ---Th.Bros: .,_,N""ew.._ ___ _ Old OR: No further action recommended because: _:{_ Lead agency has been notified: f)De-:S 5'/r;.;-~@..eJ/lf,(&'V"T .5'..nu1cr;T5 _ Problem has been corrected. No problem has been Identified. Prior Investigation addresses problem: ---See Alo# · . -~ta problem -NDAP will not consider because: _ Water originates onslte and/or on neighboring parcel _. Location Is outside SWM Servl::;.:,Ar,J1. · _._Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED: _/_f_; 0 { t ..zf:_ by: ~ 1< FT)-ru'S::::> 965 King County Department of Natural Resources Surface Water Management DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT FIELD INVESTIGATION FILE NO 96-1771 NAME: JOHN KAUZLARICH ADDRESS: 12227 148THAVESE PHONE 454-9700 MAINTENANCE 4 THOMAS PAGE 627J7 DATE 10-25-96 INITIALS DCD (11) DETAILS OF INVESTIGATION: Dave Kauzlarich is the son of the property owners. Dave is concerned that the property has been damaged with all the activity at the nursery to the south and the neighbors to the north of them. A wetland now exists on the backside of the property. Dave feels with. all the. activity of the · other propeties they are now the dumping ground for all the surface water flows. I walked the pasture on the backside of the property and found the wetland Dave was talking about but could not find a direct flow path of the water from the nursery or the north property. it appears the water ponds on the Kauzlarich's property than flows to the north. I will check the sensitive areas maps to find out what is located on the backside of this propety • . SKETCH: e FILLAREA •........................................................................................•.... • I ~ ···································· ······················-----···································································· NURSERY • : ............................................................................................................................................................ . 148THAVESE Location of probl81ll, If different Reported Problem: .1/!J?.~~ wf(J~ ~ -~ 2:>w"m ·!wJ aJy . -~ ~ 6)/v!u:a ~-~ . . . . (Pupc!-~~ _(V{0~~~~-. • ~""lit)I""'-~S(."-J _(~- Plat name: /l'J "'+ lo/en'-( /(c,,,-ce_:5 Other agencies Involved: ······:, Lot No: 1 . Block No: No_Fleld Investigation Needed __ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notlfled on ___ by _ phone _ letter _ In person (' /-)1)4~ DISPOSITION: Turned ~o f-· on f-r) , 9 7 . by#-= OR: No further action recommended because: _ Lead agency has been notlfled: ---,.,--...,...,..--,,---,--.,-,--=-,-----,,..,..--,---,-..,....--,..,------, -. oblem has been corrected. _ No p_roblem has been ldentlfled. _ Prior Investigation addresses problem: _ r/vate problem -NDAP will not consider because: _ Water originates onslte and/or on neighboring parcel . Location Is outside SWM Service Area. -' . Sea Ale# ____ _ _. _ Other (Specify): • Date: January 13, 1997 Date of Investigation: January 11, 1997 FM: Gary-Paul Reinke RE: Evaluation for Complaint# 97-0056 Ben Lamb 14105 SE 133"' Street Renton, WA 98059 255-5459 -----·----. Mr. Lamb lives in the Puget Colony Homes project. The neighborhood had significant flooding during the Xmas storm of 1997. They experienced several feet of standing water around their homes. This area has been under a study by Wendy Kara and Don Althauser. They do have a project that is ready to be started but are held up by one or two property owners. A public meeting is schedule for this coming February to discuss the solution. This part of the complaint should be closed to that project. -Downstream from Mr. Lamb is another series of pipes which might be plugged or collapsed. I suggest we do a Quick Fix on this section to determine the actual condition of the pipe. Please see the attached diagram. <... e-.., (.:! e'\) KING COUNlY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION {10) ~ DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT · o . Page 1i INVESTIGATION.REQUEST Type FCre, Date: fl Is Ir 1 OK'd by: §)W:: File No. C\1-() 1 / '5 I I . • Received from: (Please prtnt plalnly for scanning). (Day) (Eve) NAME: . fl~/ JJJ5a;l/),f,jJ/!?/ . . . PHONE «$5-' 2at'"'-)-~-~ . Ci. . ADDRESS: /38 ~'l c,,2&, . /3/ff <<71 City '-18.Klii?v State Zip f'J'(15i LocaUon of problem, If different: (~/)'/LI:/ £Ac/Irv ~ f4~; I( o/ ~ l,d, . Sk -M-'f" fa_i11 )tu. .'10~1,{U,,, • GO a,(!.~,;/liY ./z(.aau.,n-9 1 UU>-'·.e,, l'i1> <J.¥4.11. e.r ~ fUd i,-.., h'L'.W cu.e.ui.J .-.aad v-. f17 o tl Aj . ~/,,U? .PJ:l,<J./ ,a:u//!i ?/,.,i,,) , '1'!~ €411t2oviz» ~~u~d..v ~ vdv.MlQI <y do a,o,il.ot/ ~"'f rvw-O'?'J SE 13~ ,)I.('./ SI- Plat·name: Lot No: Block No: Other agencies Involved: No Field Investigation Needed __ _ (lnttla./s) ;Jitif!~lle~~'ft~~~~Ut#BBILY§1£Pl§!f?.PMPtrA1N.1:fflfl?i~~&filift:~!!:k~%!~~~NJM!;j;!A:&~1Itt:~ j/jJ· ;(; ,J3 _5_ Parcel No. /i;z'/...'l;Q6 -01..1.? Kroll Jl/0 V\/ Th.Bros: New (oj/pf/c2 1/4 S T R Old o'7:> 1)5 Basini.elf Council Dist_fa__ Charge No: RESPONSE: Citizen ncitttied on 4!~-1'7 by y_· _ phone_ letter _· ·_ In perso~ · !;!;~ :~c..Js Mz.; •. Je,~q~. ~/ ,t;, Je/r.., 4>.~s,cfy f, /JL P~, DISPOSITION: Turned to · on . by . OR: No further action recommended because j:l Lead agency has been notified: lo ~ &:1,+wv:rd?'f 1<1.v &r: -fr,i{f-ECJ/f L--t! P 5 • Problem has been corrected. No problem has been Identified. Prior Investigation addresses problem: -See Filo# · _ Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: Water originates onslte and/or on neighboring parcel -Location Is outside SWM Service Area. Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED:~ /!"/fl by: fl If r1) 7c) ~j) _j' INVJISl'IGATION DATE, 4-10-97 ADDRESS; ~J84S SE 131ST ST LOCATION, CITY RENTON PHONE ZIP 980S9 REPORT DATE, 4-11-97 MAINTENANCE DMSION, 4° ll'ACJUTY# INITIALS: DCD CHAIN LINK FENCED DAMAGED DUR)NG LAST STORM EVENT. NEED TO DO A ASSESSMENT OF THE FACILITY ON MIS TO REPLACE THE CHAIN LINK FENCE. W1LL DO RESEARCH TO FIND OUT WHAT POND nns IS AND WHETHER WE MAINTAIN TIDS POND. COULD BE AN OLD OFF OR REGIONAL FACILITY. FURTHER RESEARCH NEEDED. I talked to Larry Gettle about tile maintenance of the pond in question and found out that ii is maintained by roads as part of the SE 1281h street drainage. Sent email to Jon Cassidy about the problem. Attached copy of e-mail to Jon Cassidy. File closed to Roads . • • DRAHl·AQ]U·INvESTIGATIONREPORT [i1o//7\ ·.~.:;, . ! I r . . Page I: INVESTIGATION REQUEST Type l.... PROBLEM:(~ d-~ $s.,'.z:.:, ':fr f"?'¥' vt:vzP r-I OK'db: FILE No.CJ1-/ 3r eceived from: (Day) ( ) 14'v5(Eve) ,_( _ ___,) NAME:.l_=o"'-&c.:;;"'--=---....;/).:....c...'-=-Je.r-~-------PHONE '1(1210(:, tJ 2.28 /C/Y:lf H I 'i o o "-f ..,. ~ I,( ADDRESS:._0=,c;--'-/...,.3=3'--~-S,-.::....:.. _______ City f(e-,,,r 7cr State tJ:{f-Zip 1 ';03'7 Location of problem, if different: Parcel NoJA2. gco-DILPD Basin I /,R._ Council District fl::_ Th.Bros: New U W J--1 2-- 0ld ?,5~· Charge No. ______ __;_ ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... -................................................... . RESPONSE: Citizen notified on _____ by: __ phone _. _ letter __ in person DISPOSITION: Turned to L on /{J; / 17,Z by.::/1/aR: No further action recommended because: __ Lead agency has been notified: ______________________ _ _ Problem has been corrected. _ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: SEE FILE.# ---- Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: .-Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. · Location is outside WLRD Service Area. __ Other (Specify): DATE cLosED: ~ , tc, <rv i -·· ---------:------ • Evans, Glenn • • From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Althauser, Don Tuesday, October 07, 1997 4:54 PM Welch, Maureen ONell, Mike; Kara, Wendy; Evans, Glenn; Adler, Paul; Parsons, Randall Phone Complaint from Lola Archer· status Ms Archer complained about activity on our Capital Improvement Project-Puget Colony Homes Flooding Improvements to your office a second time. · We called her to understand her Issues about unfenced area of the project and nuisance flooding potential in her rear yard area. People were accessing her property at times when the contractor's equipment did not block entry and caused nuis.ance on tl)e unimproved right of way adjacent to her home. Paul Adler supervised a Conservation Corp crew to Install a pennanent fence at the perimeter of the work area at several sites to secure the private properties. HI~ program allowed for quick response and an Inexpensive solution to the complaint. Ms Archer is concerned about surface water drainage changes that may occur due to our construction. We ·have filed her complaint with Local Drainage Services Unit and requested support from Glen Evans in the Neighborhood Drainage Assistance Program to provide a drainage solution for her lot and an adjoining lot. This program Is capable of providing small drainage project construction this fall. It Is apparent from field inspection that they need a drainage line to convey surface flows from an adjoining pasture-through their lots to the street drainage system. Our field Inspector has had many contacts with Ms. Archer and taken care to protect her property, but Ms Archer felt we were not addressing her issues adequately and quickly enough. I have also encouraged her to contact me in the future If she feels her concerns are not being addressed. From discussion with her and 11eighbors I think these staff actions will fully address her concerns . Page 1 • NEIGHBORHOOD DRAINAGE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM COMPLAINANT EVALUATION MBMO DATE: December 2, 1997 TO: FILE FROM: JEFF JACOBSON RE: ENGINEERING EVALUATION FOR COMPLAINT NO. 97-1378; Archer COMPLAINT CHRONOLOGY: ORIGINAL: FIELD INV: FIELD EVAL: OLD FILES: BACKGROUND: 9/24/97 ll/21/97 ll/21/97 N/A Don Althauser with the CIP group is heading a conveyanc·e project in the area of SE 133rd Street and 140th Avenue SE. The project will convey the area's surface water from a nearby wetland along an undeveloped portion of King County right-of-way, 140th Avenue SE. As part of the project the County cleared the flora found in the right-of- way including a few large trees. The· conveyance line is expected to be constructed sometime in the late spring of 1998. Two residents claim to have been affected by the clearing practice, the aforementioned Ms. Archer and her neighbor Lilly Bischai/ Rene Treadwell. Ms. Archer claims surface water enters the· back of her property resulting in standing water problems. According to Ms. Archer ·the recent clearing has exasperated the extent of the standing water problems. In the past Archer's neighbors, Bischai/Treadwell, have had greater standing water problems. They have a sump pump in the basement of their house. The pump outlets to the drainage system fronting their property along SE 133rd Street. Ms. Archer would like to see a conveyance system installed along the property boundary shared with her neighbor Bischai/Treadwell with the termination point located in the backyard. The Bischai/Treadwells have recently expressed their desires to have a drainage system installed after first taking a "wait and see 11 approach. The rainstorm of December 17, 10th of 1997 changed their minds. Both residents firmly believe the recent clearing has exasperated their drainage problems. FINDINGS: Since the problem meets all of the NDAP project criteria listed below, it qualifies for and has been investigated under the NDAP program. • The problem site is within the SWM service area and does not involve a King County (KC) code violation. l -·-------------·-·-···-···---------- • • • The problem site shows evidence .of or reported localized flooding, erosion and/or sedimentation within the off road drainage system on private residential and/or commercial property due to later upstream development. • The problem is caused by surface water from more than one adjoining property. ·soILS: According to the KC soils map, the site is located in the. following soil association: ALDERWOOD ASSOCIATION: Moderately well drained undulating to hilly soils that have dense, very slowly permeable glacial till at a depth of 20 to 40 inches; on uplands and terraces. OPTIONS AND DISCUSSION, 1. Construct a conveyance line along the two complainant 1 s properties with one termination point in the backyard of the Archer property and the other in the open ditch found on the Bischai property. The conveyance line would outlet in the sump/storm drain system found fronting the complainants• property. 2. Do nothing. The CIP project may provide some relief to the problem. The project is scheduled to be constructed in the spring/summer of 1998. The trench for the project may intercept problematic surface water and re-direct it to the south and away from the complainants' properties. IMPACT SCORB = 40 PROPOSBD SOLUTION: The NDA Program will incur the material coats for the proposed project discussed under option number. 1. The CIP group will provide the funding for the remainder of the project. PRIORITY SCORB = 3,1 2 ----· ........ I. U..&..&;.I.U..i,L!.UJ .LU1,J.U.I .1.'-1!.,~VU.t(\ ... J:!.~ .UlVl..SlUN (iBJ . Type c._. DRAINAGE INvESTIGATION REPORT ~ Pag~: IJ>j)fESTIGATION REQUEST _,_.. ..... '-=~==='--"k-'~,nµv'==--~ Date: ~ OK'd b FILE No. 0,,-/ ?:J£f/) I / (Day) ~< -~l (Eve) ( ) NAME: ?ilfJt $/id,,._i lf:eue' l;m!w-! PHONE----- ADDRESS: /L/.DP.£ ~ (.s~ ie:l> S,f-City Ke.do-'! State vlJ ZipCJ?o5:f Location of problem, if different: Reported Problem: CALL FIRST D (Would Like To Be Present) -5o.e.-Je.scn'pt,~ hr ~/,,_ j)_ rcL-r- -tnarne: Lot No: Block No: Other agencies involved: No field investigation required __ (initials) .. ···'·TO. a·E' ''c'oMP. "E .. TE. Ii' ay'tcoMPLAlNT PROGRAM STA lro,.,,,c:!'.,;,;',_J;;,;: ,,,,,,f~.,;,;,,:)$,;ct;'.l•';b"',""· .•... · , .... · . · .. , .. -.. _ ,,.:.'!-" .•...... , .•. ,. , .. ,......... . , , .. , .. , . . ., ... , ... ~',£: ........ ,..,,,,..1,,.·.tr.,>-~·,f.iP.,••o:iiJ.;.oo,•'.•.·."~;_t•':'t..-·-::··.J.., Parcel No, &fl 2-g-{Jo -DI ]O Kroll 'bl() E, Th.Bros: New &6& H 2. Old 35DS BasinLL.t2 Council District .!..2::_ Charge No. ________ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notified on ------by: __ phone _._ letter __ in person DISPOSITION: Turned to on -~'-~'--by __ OR: No further action recommended because: __ Lead agency has been notified: ______ -c-----------,-----,------- --Problem has bee·n corrected. __ No problem has been identified. __ Prior invest!$,ation addresses problem: . · SEE FILE# <:t-2-r Y7 ~ • Private problem -NDAP will riot consider because: ___ Water originates onsite and/or on neig~boring parcel. Location is outside WLRD Se~. __ Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED: /01 / I fJ By: ___L!]/ _St::-~-9'7-/J7J7 • • KING COUNTY WATER & LAND RESOURCES INTERNAL MEMORANDUM TO: Glenn Evans FROM: Larry Gettle DATE: October 1, 1997 SUBJECT: Archer, Lola 97-1378 14004 Southeast 133rd Street Reference, 97-1380 Treadwell These complaints were referred to us by Don Althauser. These sites are adjacent to and part of the Puget Colony Homes BPCIP Project. The problem here is water ponding in the backyards of these two parcels. These are being referred to you per your disqussion with Don . D~EINVESTIGATIONllEPORT 4W D~ Page I: INVESTIGATION REQUEST ~Q) Type ~® PROBLEM: l1fY1d._ RECEIVED BY: lJ.ej Date: 1/':l' OK'd by:))~FILE No. CfJ-())()7 .Received from: . NAME: O.;ie.. Gae.-t?§ke... ADDRESS: f7f\0-:1 1±3 f>, ]?I . SE. Location of problem, if different: ·~0515 (Day) ( 4-1.t;) PHONE 22.LP -U ti_, (Eve) ( ) City ]E't1-fmL.-State __ Zip C,3QS'1 Reported Problem: CALL FIRST D (Would Like To Be Present) Other agencies involved: Lot No: "TP--14 Block No: No field investigation required __ (initials) //S1 l'+.3 ~El,: Parcel No. lDJ1Q;-Q5tD Kroll~! \N Th.Bros: Ne'f{gS/t> ::f:;, 01cl-~st)<, Basin /AJ2-:: Council District JL Charge No. ________ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notified on /-s:-lt by: __ phone _·_ letter _Lin person DISPOSITION: . Turned to on / / by __ OR: No further action recommended because: L. Lead agency has been notified: fo A::;:•s tf/1y if! %---z (ifL: or2 ..S __ Problem has been corrected. __ . No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: SEE FILE# ---- __ Private problem -NDAP will riot consider because: • Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring JJarcel. Location is outside WLRD Serjsj,J:;Cj· __ Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED: f 1i-f 1'[( By: _.)fL_"'v . w'I 30£3 ·:) .. 0 0 0 iO 0 0 0 0 0 (l) 0. 0 0 lml~gency ------ NaUnce Division: 4 Thous Bros "ap: 657 A3 Type: Pond BRIAR HILLS I 4 Street Address: 14005 -149TH PL SE Dixections: FROM SE 128TH ST, TAKE 144TH SE 142ND ST. TURN LEFT ONTO 149TH PL SE. 14005. AVE THE Checked on 1/15/96 by DOUS DOBKINS~ Special Equip1ent: Radio 1: 555 SV" Notes/Co11ents: Charge to Project 1: 067475 Fisheries: N Repair inlet pipe to CS/CBI and bactlill with 4 to 6 inch spalls to anchor pipe. If you have any questions concerning the anchoring of the pipe please contact Doug Dobkins at 296-1975 or on Cell 660-6352. Roads Div. Notes: t Task Un it Code Type Units Vort Requested V02 Ea.Fae. I ·1 •Re1ove sedi1ent in control structure CSCB/1, lref!O) ' VIS Each 2 IReaove sedi1ent lro1 the following catch basinls) and dispose in accordance with applicable Regulations: CBt2 CBt3 lref210) V24 Ea.fac. I •Perlon the following aaint_enance/repair wort: repair inlet pipe to CS/CBI. see notes in the co11ent section .• ( rel6b0) Work A_uthor i zed:---------------- Wor k Completed '----------------Progra1 Version: February 22 1 1993 Date Actual "aterial Naterial Co1pleted Units !nit Placed Excavated Date: _____ _ Date: _____ _ ;,-2-_, __ KING COUNTY \V ATER Mt9 hAND RESOURCES DIVISION · DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT f 7-1 ') \ Page I: lNVESTIGA TION REQUEST ( ' Type L- PROBLEM: t:{AJ f\A:C;;::f;, -EIVED BY: µu · Received from: Date: C:/ 2-2... OK'dby: ~!LENO. q f]-(J6LPD NAME: GltYQi ADDRESS: \"\464 Mo{Vr % I ?f2-!.Jr 5fr (Day) (425) (Eve) £l& PHONE 2.01 -L,,//)) (8<T ~ 2:'t /.e -, '1 3(, Location of problem, if different: Reported Problem: CALL FIRST D (Would Like To Be P~esent) • rr0pev+j ~'VltVlCL, Lo -k--h~ v. She: 8 m+o hov p-zi ~ v:J . V\JD\,l.,{d {?cl..SD /Jl<:e ~ Lnfornuvnon l-. ;, J 1J77,<.-, \fJ /-/'Vt I fl BAf · t.o.,n u,c, v-· Plat name: f:>l<LCK 1-.cJCL,v._ 5-<'.GCl\..e... Other agencies involved: I . 2-'?:> u.. State. __ Zipq &:Y.:fl Lot No: 7 Block No: No field investigation required. __ (initials) TO BE COMPLETED BY COMPLAINT PROGRAM STAFF ~ 15 '23 5 YI S ~ -R-Parcel No. oZ4-1lO -00':>"r Council District!:!___ Kroll l?IO fo Th.Bros: New L,E:l,, .::r:'lv Old ·3?D '? Charge No. _______ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notified on 6 -2-J-9 8 by: V phone __ letter __ in person "7e.n f To DD E $ -C:,Y-"-cl.: vtj . C..o .-it-o.c.. f : .E:.&-./r\ ~ j Sc..n <I..: 17. ) ND p E'.. (' V>1, f ~ + 0 IA YI d -t O Y' j V'o.. d : V1 '.:) ~O Y-k) p O SS : b )e_ ; YVI? a L + +o YYle.je'f' pvopex"tj. DISPOSITION: Turned to on / / by __ OR:. No further action recommended because: --1r' Lead agency has been notified: //Rz-btz(6-'Lt:1t'P'c;,--c.,'T £.ze:v1C;r::5 ;){)~ _ Problem has been corr~cted. _ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: SEE FILE# ---- --Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: · Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. Location is outside WLRD Se~e'.l/ __ Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED: ? p?tj I f?ef"' By: _Ll_'</ . /~.P~ • ..... __ ·-------. -···--•, -·· Complaint 98-0360 Meyer Investigated by Robert Manns on 5-27-98 I found that a large area had been cleared, approximately 1/2 acre. An existing depression with water is located at the south side of Tax parcel 084710-0045, next to Meyer's property. Some dirt and debris has been pushed into the water from the grading work being done on parcel -0045. I checked Sierra and found no pennits for the grading work. Clarence Weyer is the property owner of this parcel. His house is on the adjoining parcel; house# 14602. Meyer's property is not impacted by the work, because of the higher eleva~on above the grading. Graded area Barn ~--EJ [Prop. Lines Meyer 14454 12" cone. 12" cone. Weyer 14602 NTS I 18" cone. SE. 132nd ST. ,. I I e1 I I I I -,1, 12" cone. 146th A VE. SE. KlNG COUNTY WATER AND LAND RESOURCES DMSIOl"y: z_) DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT . C z c;; iJ ~ . // · _ Jage I: INVESTIGATION REQUEST Type r L,/ l PROBLEM: r~Vi:f/fP/.L · . • EIVED BY: <m'z ) . . Date: Rji<Je OK'd by: F~LE No. PJ' ~ 5!20 Received from:~ or; M{t!e.) ~_) . /) . (Day) ( NAME: ~N1Lv· PHONE _____ _ ) (Eve) ,._( _ __,) ADDRESS: ________________ City ______ State. __ Zip __ _ Locationofproblem,ifdifferent: /!/:Jf$ c)b /'lcl/4 Sf Reported Problem: CALL FIRST D (Would Like To Be P~esent) . f)dz;AJ aaMd.i/&' «%~ f!iJ/JM?-!Y ~ ~/ ~~4, ~/,() Wela, ~W ~o/ ~A/U/ &I,/,¢ AV&'~ a/2,J. ~ <~ mLll d~_;~, '/;/o/ -4c.c/2.L, ~ ~d, 11,~7/)_ !J900 fo. 9, en 1)90515 rt/) ;J<J{}S-l'/f-t/, r'.ISE 'r 8../537 A . -"'I I /1/J. -HI 'l ,0007 'u /2.//l,!v-Al.t!Je,!J. H Plat name: -' L) Lot No: Block No: Other agencies involved: No field investigation required __ (initials) TO BE COMPLETED BY COMPLAIN.T PROGRAM STAFF : to57 -¥ _LL _2J. 3_ · . (} "7 '} ,;; ui L:-'1 J O I I/ ) !!.i S · T R Parcel No. / r-a'O,m,J:LO Kroll o I I Lt/ Th.Bros: New Old Basin· @ Council District _./d__ 65,:rY ,350foEL, Charge No. ________ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notified on ------by: __ phone __ letter __ in·person DISPOSITION: Turned to on --'/'----'-/ __ by __ OR: No further action recommended because: __ Lead agency has been notifi't\".;.:.,------------------------ -Problem has been corr~cted. No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: . . SEE FILE# ---- • Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: __ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. Location is outside WLRD S~a. __ Other (Specify): DATECLOSED: f'1 /Jiff . By: //1/~t!I/J I l~ • • • Complaint 98-0520 Anonymous . ' Investigated by Robert Manns on 8-6-98 . I checked D90515 and found no problems. This facility has no ditch. In the pond facility D90669 there is a rock lined ditch that I found to have no problems. This pond had work done on it last year. It's clean and functioning. No problem was identified. No photo's were taken . __ -·. -.. , , ............ """•II.Lu..,_ .......,, .. ,.n.u J.'-t.::,vu..t<.l.:,L:S·.lJJ V i.SlUN DRAINAGE lNVESTIGATION REPORT -R~M . . . ~ Page I: lNVESTIGA TION REQUEST ~~ PROBLEM: /U(},XJ ~ [Q .s/ceC/'A?U . CEIVED BY: Date: 'if· /O-'tf OK'd b : PR.lo+ FILE No. </i -!fJf Type tUtC.· eceived from: Location of problem, if different: I. ,</E . c.5 ,:;,1 Yi s T TO BE C0~1PLETED BY COMPLAJN_T PROGRAM STAFF __,5_ . R Parcel No. ()8t/'!/OC(} 7j Council District /J Kroll f?/rJ/::, Th.Bros: New CS,:;, J:2-., Old J50j Charge No. _______ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notified on -----by: __ phone __ letter __ in· person DISPOSITION: Turned tJJJ~'2..on f / I r / f t by~R: No further actio~ recommended because: tified:·----------------------- -No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: SEE FILE# ---- Private problem -NDAP will not consider because:. -. Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. Location is outside WLRD Servi~e: __ Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED: /2 ;20 ;0( By:0-~R( f?~~&,e~b . . • ---·-·---------· .. -----···------------. --·- Date: March 26, 2001 Date of Investigation: December 14'\ 2000 FM: Gary-Paul Reinke RE: WQ Evaluation for Complaint# 98-0534 Shayla and Casey Cox 13224 -144~ Avenue SE Renton, WA. 98055 Day ~CONNECTED (the Cox family has moved on) Owner t:-768-1062 Findings I have been checking this site whenever I was in the area to see if! could find any evidence of the problems the Cox's have mentioned. I have not found any evidence of house pipes exiting to the stream or any other part of the property. TI1e Cox's have moved on and there is a new family in the house now. They had no idea of what I was talking about. I did contact the owner (Roger Brendan) of the property and he said the previous tenants had made the illegal connection. The former tenants are now gone and the illegal pipe has been plugged up. Numerous visits to the site confirm this is no longer a problem. Options and Discussion As I stated, I haven't found any evidence of the problem in about 8 spot checks on the place. TI1e overall condition of the property is poor and there is lots of junk lying about but nothing that would seem to affect water quality. Proposed Solution I suggest we close the complaint. ,· KING COUNTY WATER AND LAND RESOURCES DIVISION DRAINAGE INvESTIGATION REPORT (z.b) . · . .? . .? Page 1: INVESTIGATION REQUEST l: Type /"°Cg_ ~mBLEM: L.£ v (t:' .,.""t:, rtJN 'j> . 'CEIVEDBY: . Lr CG-rTLc Date: 3/.z/ )' 7 OK'd by: FILENO, qq-o;g!{ r. Received from: (Day) ( ¢-;. S (Eve) ( ) NAME: _,_A.L.::..t-_l.4_;__0 _ _.A __ ~:...,l_c::.E:._S"_L-=c-7'2._ ____ PHONE Z 2-C • / ,{-f(. ADDRESS :_,_/_,4'-l'-D'-'<.5.C:...~·-+/-4'-"-f_,_17-"ri'---'/?'--'L=:c._cS:=c~City .R 0-;7e1.,J State w A Zip Q2Ds5 Location of problem, if different: Reported Problem: CALL FIRST D (Would Like To Be Present) J</P ~,;v£) aJ..,-c.-c, t<"c A-D Arv0 f /M. I) ~'7 Plat name: W i a/ U. \ \ s No · 2.. f1_ U.t't:c-0, LvAr~ /!7z cE rz-c,c;, P /,v C: Lot No: '3/ Block No: s T R Th.Bros: New_,."--<~'-=- Old Basin UL RESPONSE: Citizen notified on WJ?--if. 15 9 SS Council District Iv Charge No. _______ _ 71z_7/9f by: -~one __ letter . __ inperson DISPOSITION: Turned to on / / by __ OR: No further action recommended because: _l'.1 Lead agency has been notified: ~A-c '::, //Vb:.• ,,_,I S?C,r IA-L.-o~.S. _·_ Problem has been corrected. _· _ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investi:e;ation addresses problem: . SEE FILE# ---- ._ Private problein -NPAP will not consider because: __ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. · Location is outside WLRD Sef:!JE~Jtl:f _· _Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED: 5 I/ 7 I ,,9/ . By: _Lfil' t,J/5fS:S- .,,.. •cc·-~-----~---------- • • • KING CouNTY Department of Natural Resources Water and Land Resource Division DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT FIELD INVESTIGATION DETAILS OF INVESTIGATION: • 99-0188 FILE NO. NAME D90515 ALLAN KIESLER ADDRESS 14102 148TH PL SE PHONE 425/226-1446 TB PAGE KROLL PAGE 611W DMP MAINT. DIVISION DATE INITIALS· 656J3 1/27/99 • SITE VISIT ON 2/27/99. RECEIVED CALL FROM L. GETTLE THAT A R/D POND LOCATED IN THE PLAT OF BRIAR HILLS DIV. 4 WAS CURRENTLY IN OVERFLOW. MET WITH MR. KIESLER AND FAMILY ON SITE. • INVESTIGATION FOUND THAT UPON SITE VISIT THE PONO WAS OCCURING A BREACH OF THE SPILLWAY ONTO 149TH PL SE, THE SPILLWAY IS DIRECTED TO OVERFLOW ONTO THE R/W WITH FLOW BEING COVEYED VIA CURBSIDE DRAIN AGE TO THE SOUTH. THREE TYPE I CATCH BASINS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF SE.139TH PL CONTAINED WATER OVERFLOW THE TOP OF THE BASIN, ·As WATER IN THE POND WAS AT A HIGHER ELEVATION THEN THE RIM OF THE BASIN GRADE. FLOW FROM THE TYPE 1 BASINS ARE CONVEY SOUTH ON 139 Pl SE., AND WEST ALONG SE 13 TH PL. A 35' AUN OF 30• CMP IS THE OUTLET PIPE FROM THE POND TO THE CONTROL MANHOLE. THE MANHOLE REFLECTED WATER ENTERING THE 30• PIPE AT APPROX. 10% CAPACITY (•THAN 4-61, THE OVERFLOW TEE-SECTIN WAS NOT IN OVERFLOW. THIS INDICATED THAT A BLOCKAGE OCCURED AT THE PIPE INLET TO THE CS/CB1. TREE DEBRIS FROM OVERHANGING EVERGREENS WERE REMOVED FROM THE PIPE INLET INCREASING THE AMOUNT OF WATER RELEASE TO THE CS/CB1. EVENTUALLY, WITH SOME MANUEL LABOR THE BLOCKAGE WAS REMOVED AND THE PONO WAS CAPABLE OF DECREASING AND THE OVERFLOW CEASED. • THE KIESLER LOT IS LOCATED ON THE S.W. SIDE OF THE POND WITH A PRIVATE GATE PROVIDING ACCESS TO THE TRACT. THE BERM ELEVATION ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PONO DID NOT POSE A THREAT TO THE KIESLER LOT. WATER WAS DESIGNED TO OVERFLOW ONTO THE R/W OF 149TH PL SE. MR. KIESLER ANO FAMILY WAS VERY PLEASED WITH THE EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCE AND OPPORTUNITY TO DISCUSS THE FUNCTION OF THE PONO • SKETCH: ~~ KING COUNTY WATER AND LAND RESOURCES DIVISION C Jt --- . DRAINAGE INvESTIGATION REPORT hfJ J . . . Page I: INVEsTIGATIONREQUEST ~ Type ~~ - .OBLEM: ~,,,_, · 'CEIVEDBY: JU/l}v Date:0 lr7 OK'dby: D~FILENO. qq-(}{e!YJ Received from: (Day) ( ) (Eve) ( ) PHONE _____ _ NAME:~ -f~ ADDRESS: /4/,gt)(g '56 /,3/ep, ,SY Location of problem, if different: City~ State __ Zipq~ Reported Problem: CALL FIRST D (Would Like To Be Present) ~cH~J nl 1,~ 'fYZ-j~ d'YL., cd 6G 12-F //4-g-tr1 fh€ .se l'll> MV--5). ~!,(;:; co~ OJ--!Ju-l::w,_,rw:,:u.d ~ (,w,p!e.0ozrd.-s 65/r:JCS). ~qu,t_ ;:;10.no 12) ~,,.;_, aluw r2J 14:gr>'-,5r} ~ hL w) . . ~ ~~r>-J ~ ~·~ Ae ~ hu A~ d+u,o !,JJ~ ~ ~ ~ ,:rY'0.,) -hu-./u,z..d ~ hVU p,()~7}-· c,L._,,j? ex~g "'=,::..~ d~ t....r rnr· • Plat name: Lot No: Block No: Other agencies involved: Th.Bros: New {;57.P J2. 01d ~0ps Basin L-CJL · Council District l_±_ Charge No. _______ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notified on r/z, ~lz-f by: __ phone ___ letter __x:_ in pt!rson d,:rr ~-,;-:;~C-A-~~ ;s,<r.r, :,,a-.r;~ .~ ~ , .. ~ ~ ~~,.o Zov,n-~ ...6y ~~-""° ~~-'· ;,r,.:...-~4--, .. .ef" ,I? w,17,,,_; a,4 c'.....-,.n ,,..,.. ~"'· e n,,..o ~ ~ ,.,,,.,-.,,._.-~. -c.1617" ~ n> :,,~ ;..; l"Z>)<' b';e nk ~.,I,,........ .,., ~ d:,...;o~ ,+,t4r ~. a&' ~ l"v'-'D .,4.,n.-~ ~u:, -r ......:.c::. ...:7-...c> ,,,.C....,~..; o;,::-~ t~i/rrl->,-4, . DISPOSITION: Turned to on I by __ OR: No further action recommended ber.ause: __£ Leadagencyhasbeennotified: /(,,.JC le>..JAFT 'J' ~::-r _· _ Problem has been corrected. -~--No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: • , SEEF'ILE# --Private problein -NPAP will not consider because: __ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. Location is outside WLRD Se~jJ3' _· _Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED: CZ1 2 I /9 By: ~U 111/fd~k :" ,'.;'' . ---· ' -··· : __ ... _--·: <~:-. .~~~ \<tt.·'.t /'. Complaint 99-0609 Torantola Investigated by Chris Treichel 08/19/99 i,1', .r:. ··-f.1'' Visited, and met Mrs. Torantola at the site. Her property is a five acre lo~ Lot 16 of Black Loam Five Acre Tracts. Her lot is at the east end of the semi developed portion of SE 136" ST. The lot slopes from north to south. Streets 144" Ave SE, 146" Ave SE, 148" Ave SE, and 132"' Ave SE are undeveloped at this time. The area in question is east of the site. It is wooded area of approximately 62. 7 acres, has type 2 and 3 wetlands on it, and is located within the city limits of Renton. There is currently a land use proposal by Bumstead Construction filed with the city under: LUA-99-069, PP, ECF,V, to subdivide the property into 218 lots for single family residences. Mrs. Torantola is concerned that the development proposal does not adequetley address the storm water runoff. She also said that two years ago she received a letter from the county wanting to vacate SE 136" ST, so the county could expand Maplewood park and put in additional baseball fields. The Bumstead proposal does not include using SE 136" ST. 14606 SE 136" ST .I I .... ~ ~! i ! I~ i: ____ JJ~ L~----.. ~ - Street End future baseball fields? NTS Wetlands ----KING COUNTY w ATER AND LAND RESOURCES DIVISION C j l --- c:i ~ J . /J. Type -1....L_ DRAINAGE INvESTIGATION REPORT Received from: NOME ~Cb~ ADDRESS: = 7 _:_ 3 !?I ( fE_" Location of problem, if different: Pint r.ame: Lot No: Block No: Basin/..--~ Council District _l.'.2::-Charge'No. _______ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notified on gq),/,z'i' by: _)L phone ___ letter __ ·in person ,,_,,nr wjw'-" (f2e,1,-...,.A/ o.,v ;, ,,nr tr/:,.7/~1 . .,.,..-~,,r,L<rf' .-$ .,..,. ,._ C...A-> -:,,<>ur- ~'"'1 ,,c;;., •• • ,..,,,, .l'o~,,._ ~,o,r,r, krr"""' .k,.,_.., ~ ,_. ~"'~""' ,.ac.,e..-..,_ ~,,,- . r4rv ~ .CO,, -1,-,,, i>.a.A,,,N V -'J ....v, ~ ~ /J,.,,,,r; DISPOSITION: Turned to on -~!-~! __ by __ OR: No further action recommended because: __ Lead agency has been notified: ______________________ _ _:__ Problem has been correcied. _ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: SEEF'n.E# ----a;-Private problem -NJ)AP will not consider because: --__ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. Location is outside WLRD S~. __Lother (Specify): DATE CLOSED: f I ,.1._ I / / By: . G-2v.J,._,"'>..;~ f2v/'/Md • Wet area • CMU Wall 2-4' tall • Complaint 99-0625 Quinn Investigated by Chris Treichel 08/30/99 Met with Mrs. Quinn on site Aug. 27, 1999. Her lot is Lot 44 of Briar Hills Div 4. The property is relatively flat bufthe house does sit in the higher elevation. There is a CMU block wall on the west property line. The water drains away from the house in all directions. They have a street to the east and south, a single-family residence to the west, and Maplewood Park to the n011h. She stated that she was worried about an area in the Northwest corner of the property where the water seems to slowly infiltrate. She stated that she and her husband thought that the sprinkler system for the yard maybe leaking,-they are in the process of replacing some of the sprinkler heads. When they were digging the sprinkler heads up, she stated that there was water in the ground. She also stated that they smelled a waste type of odor. The area seemed to be the low point from the park, house and neighbors. She stated that this was occurring prior to the CMU wall being installed. Maplewood Park Blockade at end of road Lot 44 Briar Hills #2 SE 138thPL NTS KING COUNTY WATER AND LAND RESOURCES DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT c~oJ 1){(,.A I ,-.\I\ Grt=-INVESTIGATION REQUEST Type-. EIVEDBY: Date: cf; '2 S ro OK'd b : FILE No. -!597 Received from: (Eve) LC _ __,) NAME: MR'- ADDRESS: / 4: / 0 D (Day) cl/:Z5) PHONE 2 '2b -'2, Cf 5°6 Ci.ty ~d'V'--State __ Zip ) /-() 5~ , LOCATION OF PROBLEM, IF DIFFERENT: Access Permissio11 Gra11ted ~ Call First (Would .Like To Be Present) Jg) Alo 1)/o /Jbl r Jy , , h'?aLj &:, llor1cls md !tlr:; J)~~~o..1!:S~ v.JjiJ>,r1 ./?,l,q../£.ft!. ~dtJ wt'-t.. UlL UU!S Y/117 ;,</ ,'hvl) /}1CLu,;_s f,20J-.rt-r, /y_r9 t/,v;rl L /._--5A!r./Sv-- Plat name: /%:, rr1 f>o;J, ·;t1Y<J Other agencies involved: Lot No: Block No: ;'Z/£ ---15_ ':23 __Ji{_ . Yi S -T-R Parcel No. //jJJ{) D f ,J / 7 Kroll f/0£ Th.Bros: New 6!JUJ /l~cf2 • Basin lC8 Council District /;l Charge No. _______ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notified on q Af 2> i, by: ~ phone __ letter __ in person l:>o,.._, f\t..-,HA-Y$.E;"IL gt' .wJ MU, YA;,JJ -ro PIS"c-vs'S v/'c.oll'-'l.lNZ. C. I 'P f (/-o)!E:sc.T, fS?> INV. 0 G G6S"9/fl-7 5~ WAS SA rl 5' ~ 16!) /,J 1-r rl HI S I !-'~-~I '~ , DISPOSITION: Turned to on / / by __ OR: No further action recommended because: ~ Lead agency has been notified: ;) W G,,i;;; 5 . b~ I>-/ A L. T HA ,J .S .(;,..fe.-. _· Problem has been corrected. _ No problem K'as been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: SEE FILE# ---• Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: ___ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. ___ Location is outside WLRD Service Area. DATE CLOSED: 'l / ~ / 0 b By: Df2.44-- -~Other (Specify): 1<. f J) -ro s vJ e Ee s KING COUN'I y w ATER AND LAND RESOURCES DIVISION . l DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT (1\ vPP- INVESTIGATION REQUEST . Type FC!l. .OBLEM: fuJJ/ovv, ~ 'CE!VED BY: Date:// pl/co OK'd by: ~ FILE No. (b. C?7k3 Received from: D ~I~ (Ev~_i __ l NAME: _____,,~ .... r ~=="'--.J..aOL,,,.Ld;.c...,,AR~A'--'--______ PHONE c1-)R -1 <./ t.t l/ ADDRESS:~L~tf,_oo~~Lf~-..... S'b£,__-+-/.J~":>f--~0---.,S .... T~City ~ r State_ -_-_-Z-ip_9_@'i __ LOCA TlON OF PROBLEM, lF DIFFERENT: UO e • Plat name: Lot No: Block No: Other agencies involved: _j)£ _j5_ _d3__ 5-- Yi S T R Parcel No. 09:,s?Q;::o/0') Kro11S/o Th.Bros: New ft:)5(,:,t/ d, Basin LC,/2.., Council District -1z::_ Charge No·----~---- RESPONSE: Citizen notified on by: __ phone __ letter __ in person p,5.:.0<;'3 ~ w / !<'tc..-1<. j,,,;,u/71//~,J P55'. !k /~ ~=1r?v' /N {,f,<JC/TC7 {.;./ / k v:r· ,1-,v{) /~ 1 .,-,v,7/ A"".cr-"A-/0'{_..-"C CY-,7..£ . DISPOSITION: Turned to on _ _,__I _-"I __ by __ OR: No further action recommended because: __ Lead agency has been notified: _________________________ _ __ Problem has been corrected. __ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: • . . SEE FILE# __ _ __ Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: ___ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. Location is outside WLR~Jrea. DA TE CLOSED l,; > I t7 / By: ~ /(;c:J}~ /?5 ,5 -~Other (Specify): • • • Complaint No 00°0763 Investigated By: Virgil Pacampara DETAILS OF INVESTIGATION Name: Lola Archer Date: November 29, 2000 I went to the residence of Mrs. Lola Archer on 11129/00 at 3 :00 PM. She was not home at time of the visit. I was able to spoke with Mr. Rene Treadwell (neighbor of Mrs. Archer) who lives at# 14005 SE 133'd St. He is also concern on the damaged gate and people entering/using the easement as a trail/access which is located at the back/rear side of his property. Mr. Treadwell showed me the damaged /torn down gate. He informed me that the King county has installed the fence gate and showed me also drainage catch basin alonf the undeveloped trail. Investigation shows that the gate is located at the south end of the culdesac of SE 132• St. The gate is made of ·aluminum grill/ round bar and attached to a wooden post (4"by 4" by 6 feet). The gate is at the corner of 140~ Ave. SE and SE 132•' Ave. St. The fence gate is detached from the wooden post and bent. Inquiry reveals that the access road is not included in the list of KC maintained road. It is a dirt road and undeveloped and no street vehicular access. Gravel Road Damage Fence Gate 2 3 15 14 Archer #14004 h fflfil!m 11 33 RD ffl"llf'm Treadwell #14005 I 18 I 31 :I 32 SS!i!. 11 M'!i'!Ml ffl'ii' • 4 DNTS KING COUNTY WATER AND LAND RESOURCES DIVISION V rf__ DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT C ~~) MOBLEM: KATS IN ~U> fb~GATION REQUEST Type r-:-c.. iL ,.ECEIYED BY: Date: 1 7., 3 O I OK'd b : ~ FILE No. 2001 _ Received from: . NAME: K~1-.1 IA '<L.u rt- ADDREss: 141 "L D SEE J] 'J H- LocATION OF PROBLEM, IF DIFFERENT: / t\-0 o S (Eve) (Day) ( lfL S} PHONEF5-L/:S b 7 f){_ City ~v--State. __ Zip __ _ J Jf-C, 4 \... f L $.f , Access Permission Granted D Call First (Would Like To Be Present) D I p. slo\ 51~ ~\ 1\1.\\\b\ fhe.-,u./7l-t \oorko1l cP h N. be-e,..,,_, r~ v I cp--/ J + ee.J1:i5 -J-k-c/ dvvk.,(. 1~ the P.-,/D fDV\J, 7/.,e_-bv--eJ aVJc.Y fc, o J) -fi!\ 't' j ~ .r'L-/.e.-,:,. vi~ +t:1.,.-+Ji e_ cf u vk-S.. h di 5 ,!,( f-}r Ci e,,f e ~ r 4 / s . ~ -I-~H!-4 ""-/ ~lc7->vh~ ~ , ? ) 5 >cj-/A-a va 1 /4 )k, /o de /e,,--fo 1 r f?v?JP!v1-v : 1 • cA,u,k., _ w/ ~ DJ~ d ,,a/tt ~1 ,a,/~ r -~ , Do JC::. /G l C:-E, AA A ~ rl 1..,S,-t:, /C /JD vJ , /~ ,'( Is -#Ly (D&J DSl s_) Lot No: Block No: s 8// v-J Th.Bros: New057 A3 B · LC-~ c ·1 o· ~ · asm ounc1 lf,stnct Charge No. RESPONSE: Citizen notified on 1 /'2.", j O \ c'.Wf':: /' phone le~tcr in person -u,..u_ .::.,MPLl\!l-1.AtJr pt-l D U:!.,t= r ,A r>\S J/ :l-C, / o I t 1 .'')o PM --· . · ~ ~il:'~ CAlL... ,.Aql",:Wf/11\ #-4::> l,._;~-..p /11VVJ ~-we 'DIP /'-'JT'Ai-JD /'t-l--f" 71a,~ "'F F,r.vr<;, !}J~.rA--11.n--1/p(le.v~lr-+'t"rie ~-l,l..?Eo.~,-.i .. r lf--S~ />,' t-,o ~i,J~~~f.l' ~ '1l4-t'z__'T'/VI='· ".:>'TILL '1J'...'.:!1µG, ."CZ> cG~,,-., 'jZ1l.t""i; =/ Me:_ ~ I° ~D AB<.~ ~ , ,AI-I-C> We A<{ie CL.ci,Sit-0 H, 0 .S. C,:')(1-1/>V',l'N I , DISPOSITION: Turned to on / / by __ OR: No further action recommended because: _ Lead agency has been notified:~:::-:--:---:--:-----.,..,--,-,,----------------- -Problem has been corrected. No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: • SEE FILE# --- Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: ___ W.ater originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. Location is outside WLRf~'J":/Area. DATE CLOSED: z_ I j ;O/ By: -~~--'v_ /VtJffl/6 -~Other (Specify): . KING COUNTY WATER AND LAND RESOURCES DIVISION DRAINAGE INvESTIGATION REPORT (?t/:$~ Type £CIL Date: OK'd b : FILE No. 2001 - Received from: PHONE aa3S~~~~67 (Eve) ,_( _ _,,) NAME:.ft/11/J. #~Y~ ADDRESS: /t./9J.0 86 /2,9'1A) /Jl City R~i-l State wA Zip __ _ LOCATION OF PROBLEM, IF DIFFERENT: /t/005 11./f: Pl Access Permission Granted D Call First (Would Like To Be Present) D ll{o . ~ ~. • • Platname: '9'765/) Lot No: Block No: s T R Parcel No. l()]JO~OS'f'.6 ' Krou<[//ltJ Th.Bros: New {fi)/}3 RDP __ Basin L,,(}L Council District /) Charge No .. __________ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notified on ajd-}l O l by: _L phone __ letter __ in person -'llt1rr T-\+e-~l,161t,Jf LJM fVl2-t.JG'.D 'Tt ~IE!.v fe-J.D vJ1\..L 17).~ 1-2..LJ~t<( DISPOSITION: Turned tog on /Z--124o/ by~R: No further action recommended because: __ Lead agency has been notified:. _________________________ _ __ Problem has been corrected. __ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: • s~~# Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: ___ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. DATECLOSED: /0; 'Z..1..-;01..-By: -1f:I _ ___,Other (Specify): /'ll.odce.,t,J eo«ec~ . -·· --·-·-------------..... • • • COMPLAINT NO. 2001-0805 Investigated By: Virgil Pacampara DETAILS OF INVESTIGATION I responded to a flooding during a stonn event on 12/13/01 at 4:30 PM. The intersection of 149™ PL. SE and SE 139111 PL. was flooded. The water level at the facility D90515 (Briar Hills #4) was very high but not overflowing to the spillway. The facility was a by-pass pond. The pond was functioning well, the water was flowing through the control structure and unto the orifice. The three catch basins at the . intersection of the road were overflowing and surface water was flowing onto the road and by passing the pond. It seems that either it is clogged or too much water coming from 149111 PL. SE and Sil 139111 PL. The water level was approx. 4-6 inches. It seems that there were too much water going to CB-4. I observe the great amount of water coming out from the 3 catch basins despite the pond was working. I spoke with &gr. Brian Slates with regards to the condition of the flooding. The surface water has not reached the houses around the area It just stayed within the edge of the lawn and side walks. I also notice that the two catch basins lid/cover was removed from the frame. The KC Roads personnel arrives at around 7:00 PM and installed the sign ("Water on the roadway") at the upstream and downstream of the 149™ PL. SE. I return to the site to check the condition of the flooding and the water had receded. I spoke with Mr. Taylor with regards to the water at their basement. He informed me that the water bas reached their heater. I went to the crawl space and notice that the water was gone The heater was worlcing. It seems that the water that impacted the crawlspace and the heater did not come from the surface water but from the ground water seeping unto the crawlspace. The clearance from the crawl surface and the base of the heater was approx. 2" -4 •. I walked and drove to the upstream and fuund that there was a large drainage facility that was discharging water downstream. The drainage facility was part of the new large development that was being constructed at SE 128 111 ST. It seems that the water from this fucility was dischatging much amount of water that may have contributed to rise of the water level of the pond (090515). The amount of water discharge from the new development has to be address in the future that may impact the facility 090515. The facility is located within the Renton jurisdiction. I reported the clogged catch basin at the intersection of 149111 PL. SE and SE 139111 PL. KC Roads drainage hot line. SEEFACILl1YSKEI'CH • • u: .. '·?"• •. $ilf511't15illi'! ffl .:hio:.f Fm: Len Juhnke RE: Engineering Review for complaint #2001-0805 Complainant: Kenneth Taylor 14920 SE 139•• Place Renton, WA 98102 Background Called compainant who said problem had already been corrected. Findings Checked with Drainage Investigator, Virgil Pacampara, with regards to complaint. Found out the problem was corrected on 4/29/02 by removing debris from the control structure and removing the trash rack at the outlet from CB2 to the pond of facility D90515. NDA Impact Score= N/A Options and Discussion Proposed Solution File should be closed as problem corrected. NDA Priority Score~ NIA KJNG COUNTY WATER AND LAND RESOURCES DIVISION DRAINAGE l1''WSTIGATI0N REPORT (-7;f5 INVESTIGATION REQUEST ~ '"J . . · ~ROBLEM:·-''J.J,.<il!~[.k~a.----- 'CEIVED BY: Date: ' FILE NO, Received from: "<I--QDe (Day) cv'Js:r NAME:_ 0 ~-· "'~'"". --=-·'-"--'=-----PHONE :J_'J/~ ?t/bt/ Vff Type~C 2002- (Eve) ~<-~) ADDRESS: _________________ City _______ State __ Zip --- LOCATION OF PROBLEM, IF DIFFERENT: / '-lo ,q 1 ~rSM Access Permission Granted D Call First (Would Like To Be .Present) D • Plat name:~ ~ Other a encies involved: Lot No: Block No: S. T R Parcel N.o. 5" / (j)J.O)~ ~('Kroll <t/Q Th.Bros: New 0!5{? s )3 RDP RESPONSE: Basin /£e Council District I t,.. City ___ Charge No. _______ _ Citizen notified on ------by: __ . phone __ letter _._ in person DISPOSITION: Turned to ~n j I / /J l--b~: No further action recommended because' Lead agency has been notified: _________ ._------------------::x Problem has been corrected. __ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: . . SEE FILE# __ _ • Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: ___ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. DATECLOSED: 3-1J/o1o3 By:~ ,-JV~~ :i::DG7Urr, __ Other {Specify): -------------------------------------------------------------- • • • Memo Date: January 29, 2003 Complaint Number: 02-0599 (Smith) From: Cameron Chapman Regarding: Closing of file 02-0599 This complaint was regarding (veggie) oil in a catch basin, reported by Grant Smith from KC Roads. The problem is long gone. Virgil P. found nothing and neither did I. It is not apparent whether Roads ever cleaned out the CB, as the basin is (still) filled with sediment. Either way, it has rained considerably since the time of the complaint, so it is probably a moot point. I smelled the water in the catch basin and it seemed normal. I stenciled the catch basin with Dump No Waste. There is nothing else to do and I am closing this file. Cameron Chapman ,.:..:_· .fl r,,[) KING COUNTY WATER AND LAND RESOURCES DIVISION A f (\,/";\, V~/1('? DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT ( ~{},,) · .-:, INVESTIGATION REQUEST . L Type re. R 40BLEM: rG I o,.._.D 0/J St -.-Z:.. 2-~ ( /) . /) 'l!,; CEIVEDBY: I ANC-<> e,t<--Date: 2 -5 03 OK'db: FILE No. 2003 - Received from: /<cDOT f<.r;:;rv NAME: 0Yl 0 /2-, J (Day) { Lf 2,5 \ PHONE ZS 5'"' -f 30 7 (Eve) ,._( _ __,) ADDRESS: /4C/1-,0 I ]C/-.h. fL S,c. . City State, __ Zip --- Pl.SE LOCATION OF PROBLEM, IF DIFFERENT: It./(){:) S: . llt-9 y,-., Access Permission Granted O Call First ·c~o~ld Like To Be ·P;esent) 0 p~~~~~~. ~~~~~·~' I ~~--6"~ &-z-• ~~nd~ Lot No: Block No: Other a encies involved: 5;-Parcel No. /Q]/)()2/J5l-/0 Kroll '6///J Th.Bros: New _m7;QJ RDP RESPONSE: Basin l C.,/L Council District _,,,(o.,_ __ City ___ Charge No. _______ _ Citizen notified on ------by: __ phone __ letter --. in person DISPOSITION: Turned to __ on / / by __ OR: No further action recommended because: . _)OLead agency has been notified: )r 0~ 5 VV]A-1,)T: 5 (l.:n:= I /Jz..--tJ ('S . __ Problem has been corrected. __ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: SEE FILE# __ _ Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: .-Water or~es onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. DATE CLOSED: 1:1 l!ltJ3 By: .~ __ Other (Specify): lJ2o745 - Citizen Action Request equest taken via DRadio Request Details ~YiiO fi, II U[( ® King County . Department of Transportation Request No:· Request Date / .:;_ 2 &? Time / '-( :--=2.."'---'-""'-----i'-. .m. )le,9uest for~ycted to --r: /9 .3D [,l.l:f-lPU -#-DIV Dispatched to,,fZL11c;· :..,'tL,J,4::-,:~,==--------------,J 3 -8-a.m. Time Ref'd _J_/---==....J(L_o p.m. Above this llne toftst11ce Use Below this line for Field Use ~- Initial Investigation by _ __,J.,__=-· --'-/-'1"'0"'-',J-'''=·J"_;<'c..,"==~-Req. Type_J2_ Findings/Action Taken o. + l,c :.L d" ,;P( ( Ye ,, ( '/'j ,e) Investigation Date / -,;J-{, , 2003 ,u~.J /"'' ~ 0 /,/,.c ,k'" rC , Task Completed /110 6 Task Code -1-// {7 ., Refer'd to ,·, RPU ___ ',.. __ Other PU & Agency I Work Scheduled __ _,_1--"-/~1-'-,'-"L'---- Month/Task Responding Pit, __ --·"'-"'-'c,,_·_...,__,__ ________ _ Date Ref'd ___ -"'------· 200_ Second Invest. by ___________________ _ Date Recv'd _________ , 200_ Action Taken .... ±lo.' ...... ,_·.,.., ~ru~),."'----'\:k,,,.-."""-~-'--'"-"'"-~--l--<j'"-'-__ .. ~J""_::>"----'<j~(.~)_r,_., ._,/ •• 5._• ----------------- ' -. . ,. a ~ ~-~:) CONTACT LOG Web Task Completed Request Type I) Date Closed, __ L/_---"-.J--='-=---· 200-=3 Mode Date Time • e of Request Choices :A.band6ned/Com'f Vehicle 8. Utility Inspection C. Contract/Overlay issues 0. Diainage E. Debris or Hazard on Roadway F. Flooding Property t A, C (E) Ema/I (I} In person {NJ Nore (/attar) (UJ Unable to contact (VJ Voice Mall G. Guardrail/Fence Damage H. Spill Cleanup (General) M. Illegal Use of RNol S. Sireel Maint./Sweep N. Shoulder Maintenance l Trash/Utter on R/W I. Inquiries RE: Maint Activities 0. Misc. Requests U. Snow/Jee J. Spray Application K. Washout Repair/Slide Removal L. Vegetation Control (Mow, Brush, etc.) P. Pothole V. Water on Road/Flooding Q. Sidewalk/Curb. Main!. W. Lid Missing (C/8, Util.) R. Repair Street/Paving X. Ditching 091 7 (Rev. 12/02) While Copy (Closure) Canary Copy (PU) Pink Copy (Scheduling) Goldenrod Copy {Data Entry) Y. Bridge Issues _ _.,__--. KING COUNTY WATER AND LAND RESOURCES DMSION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT 11v 12- -BLEM: J:)tv,-t iv&Ge:f'" RECEIVE~BY: L--b<ETT(~ Received from: INVESTIGATION REQUEST Date: l ~ / (f 03 OK'd by: FILE NO, (Day) c1?S1 PHONE 235:-4.:f(,. 7 "'-; Type r'CR_ 2003-ff6</5 (Eve) ~C-~} City ffe;,v-rv' l{V State p .J' NAME: Kc-.u 7/J y l.. CJ e ADDRESS: /4 fZ.O 5e; (52m ~L ' Zip ?IP.5? LOCATION OF PROBLEM, IF DIFFERENT: Access Permission Granted D Call First (;o~ld Like To Be P;esent) D ~0c.r 17 ,5 S .a c-Zoi? FY? 6?\J (. Plat name: 0905 { '5· ~ jJ})J P q Lot No:. Block No: Other a encies involved: s Th.Bros: New 0S"'j,) RDP Basin lU Council District / J City Charge No. _______ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notified on aj I l )"1L by:~ phone __ letter __ in p~rson Sp-,,~ u.)~ -'~ IL~ ~+-.' ',t.;_G-( 'f'~ I..,)~ k'-$ ?Jt.~\ ~ fH,if ~ SpJ r{cr~, t1=w ~ Lu~ F""lo"t% ':Jo .k.__ t f' DISPOSITION: Turned to on _...1./ _ _,/ __ by_. _ OR: No further action recommended because: _ Lead agency has been notified'------------------~------ -Problem has been corrected. _ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: ' SEE FILE# Private problem -NDAP will not consider becau.se: Water originates onsite~d/o on eighboring parcel. -f,_; Other (Specifyl;. · I ? )/ /'l'J o.iM<-V bJ<2aJ....Aw~ DA TE CLOSED: VT !'-' :J By: · I ~fr) f4?,; (D~ KING COUNTY RAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT FIELD INVESTIGATION NAME: Ken Taylor ADDRESS: 14920 SE 139•h Pl, Renton, 98059 PHONE: 425-235-4367 . TH. BROS PG: 656J3 KROLL PAGE: 811 MAINT. DIV: 4 INITIALS:MAG On site December 5, 2003. At the time of my visit it was precipitating heavily and the pond and control structure were working at well. The inlet to the control structure had some moderate debris on the trash rack. This debris did not disrupt flow to the control structure. The inlet to the pond was running at normal capacity for the conditions at the time of inspection. The Emergency spillway for this pond spills over the control structure onto 149 1• PL SE. On November 19, 2003 the area experienced significant precipitation. I could find no defects at the time of my inspection to indicate a blockage in the control structure or catch basins down stream from this facility. • ... i 1J i (/J m SE 139th Pl • • TerraServer Image Courtesy of the USGS Send To Printer Image courtesy of the.tJ $. Geological Survey Page I of I Change to Landscape © 2004 Microsoft Corporation. Terms of Use Privacy Statement http://terraserver.microsoft.com/Printlmage.aspx?T=4&S=l l&Z= I O&X= 1408& Y=13146&... 9/2/2005 I l I I ! • • "' • 1/2 0 + MILE N The boundaries of the sensitive areas dis- Played on these maps are approximate. Additional sensitive areas that have not been mapped may be present on a devel- o pment propo sal site. Where differences occur b etween what Is Illustrated on these maps and t he si te conditions, the actual pre- sence or absence o n the site of the sensitive area -as defined In the Sensitive Area Ordinan ce • Is the legal contro l . One-hundred-y .. r floodpl1lns extend be- yond those shown on maps. Flood In- surance Rate Maps do not a1w1ys Show the floodplain to the hud-ters of streams. I ~,._(o \ y:_ '··-... Streams and 100- y ear Floodplains • • • • • • • • • • Claaa1 Claaa 2 (Wti'I aalmonida) ClaA 2 (perennial; aalmonld UM Undetermined) Claaa3 Unclaaeified Issaquah r--... - !-' ·/~-- ,,, ~'5 -. '"'\ '· ---.. -. ,,~ ' \_ \ ''-- \ \"'-• I \ I I I I 9 • • 1/2 0 • + MILE N The boundaries of the sensitive areas dis- Played on these maps a r e approximate . Additional sensitive areas that have not been mapped may be present o n a devel- opment proposal site. Where differences occur between what Is illustrated on th ese maps and the site conditions, the actual pre- sence or absence on the site of the sensitive area • as defined I n the Sensitive A r ea Ordinance · is the l egal control. I -,, : ... ) :~ . -:~ .. ~ ~,--<·1 --:...b.... . .. ~~-.... : !, °""'')I -c!> . -..::,..: _. ... ,..-.-~ . ' ! .. .L .... -~- ., .. ···r~-,. --=-·~r- ' -' ... · ... , -, ':... ·, . {'"• ~hes• coal m i nes have had addltlonal min- I ng since the most recent map was flied w i th the Wash i ngton Department of Natural Re- sou r ces. Any development that occurs adJ.ac:ent to th-areas should be preceded by I t horo u gh study to confirm or deny the existen ce of additiona l subsurface t u n nel s. Coal Mine H~rd Areas ,. -·· ,, ......... _;;. ·., . I _., -.,i, -· .)"" .. . " . \ J:;_~:' ·:-:-~ -;j . .... ~L ' ... ---~--'-l--.-:~ . _;,;.. ' -..,.; '1-: -. \ . . ' ; . ' ,., , _,. ,.,/ ' • J -·· -~ L -~ . \ , . !l,. - , i ' . . " .~ . ,, .-t. -~. . ' I I ·'-... ~ .. t •• . ;. ):: . ,-. <i +v ~ .. "\": ~ i •• :. .•.-. I • L ; I -r I \ ,+----~,". , ~1 •• -\ -p "\ /. t - I ,._ 1 -: ·-: '·: ~, -.z, • I I ,•'l :'.'· -.. • , \:· . ,-:'-\=·-\. 't I ·'-: : ...... ,_ "''1r·. . \I .,,, ;' \ -~ _,-;: ' ' {; ,. -' >< 11 h 4,., ' ( / . . x.-: ;\ h.»;. . ·\Y+ r . . ; ,. ·•'5-· I ,) • J/ \.._ . "'\· ,,: 1 • y. -·--~-------. r ff ""-· ' I ,_. •-' r ..... , ... r ,l, r ·-·· . • . f ,, • .,_ ! ' I --..,...•, ~----·.•.·r -.-..; .. • _. 1 ... :-_, ; · :i, .._ I • • • ' • I , •! ., . .' ... Issaquah ,. .' I 9 \ \ \ • • 1/2 0 • + MILE N The boundaries of the sensitive areas dis- Played on these maps are approximate . Additional sensitive areas that have not been mapped may be present on a devel- opment proposa l site. Where differences occur between what Is ill ustrated on these maps and the site conditions, the actual pre- se nce or absence on the site o f the sensitive area -as defi ned In the sensitiv e Area O rdinance -is the legal control. ''-·_., Erosion Hazard A reas Issaquah 7 ) :,i cl ~-· _,_-~--__ ........ 9 ~.: -~ 0 W:.. ~ ,:, ... 0 "i -~ .. . . .. .. --, .. :;: • • ' , . .. , . • L_ .. ! \ J . · .. -:.~;., .. ,,J·· '-:--, . ,, , .. -~-t- := ,h '-~, ; •.. ·i ,, ....... .1,..,.--- \•I [ r I r'. •I ,: • • I i. ··~-· '.l .L-.. , -:--. ' ~ . . ' -C. ' , . -:--- ,. . ., ~. -'. ····-... , . ,..I, 't·. '·'-'"7:? L.. -..... \-_s ·.' •. ' ,__ .. /,,.;-,,~: \. I .:._ ; i r''--.. ~~~-·-~r -·1··· ·. ) ,~ -x_ _ ~ O') 0 ,-,._. I ·~- I w ...J ~ • I , • • .. 1/2 0 • MILE + N The boundaries of the sensitive areas dis- played on these maps are approximate . Additional sensitive areas that have not been mapped may be p r esent on a devel - opment proposal site. Where differences occur between what Is illustrat ed on these m aps and the si te cond itions, the actual pre- sence o r absence on the site of the sensitive area · as defined In the Sensit ive Area O r dinance · is the legal con t rol. "' r ~; '·'" •t i • t Landslide Hazard Areas : "' . ' \ ' : I. I ~ . 4 ;:., -----.. . '~ -.~ -~~ j i_, .. ,; ,.'t'--; _: . ~ .: .. ., .. ; ·t ' /r. ....... _ ': -} Y.~. . ---,-·-+!r: "r \ . -"'{: I • ,J • ! I ....1 -.. / T~ ,! • "· ! -~- ---~L~ ~~-- ' -.._.,ltf-::--. \ • -.. ,. ·-, ,·t ~-- .. .i t • I .. v~ -~-;, ~>' -~ ·' ... : i • ':t(; I I : ~ -+;-:' _: :~ i · .... ,: • ~1 · •• ·1···,; .'., ~ J I \/~~:' :-!:-, f./ I • :: . ,' J "f~,~~ .... ~.,.'-.'i; · -~'< ~:. t ~~ I; ; .. , .. ' . • ~ -, • . -... -' • -l: ' • ' ; ., ~- ·~:':- ,. '- 1l ~~f s I -. I • / / I .-.,(.I ...~ . , (., . , r' :>Y~ ,, ~~ -~_,.,., . ·' ~ ,, Ir .. .-( . . 4 r '~ ""'-!~,-.•.. : t -, • ' \,, ~-. : --<-;-· •. .._~ ·. ' ~ ' ~-. .. : . . ' '--. ' ' ·--'4 ..,,.,-__ .... ~~-·---"·-r __ ,i ..... , ,, ! • I ' ,-. .,....: ..•• -•• ' . ' , .. 1 , ··i ! . ' ' I ~ : 'I • .t& , I Issaquah 9 O?JO O?J OOlillll ~ lim f3ll!lll6JA m ~ ~ ~lllD ~11!11lllm , ·~ ? ~ __ ./", . .;, \~ 1 .... ' <® Application f 'Land Use Permits King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 Alternative formats available upon request Do not write in this box Application Number(s): Lo5P·oo,9 SEP 2,8 2005 K.C. D.D.E.S. Date Received: (Stamp DO NOt WRITE ABOVE.THIS DIVIDER I (We) request the following permit(s) or approval(s):. · ~·1' \ . 0 · oBuilding Permit O Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 0 Clearing & Grading Permit O ' . Shoreline Conditional Use Permit 0 Temporary Use Permit O Shoreline Variance . 0 Binding Site Plan O Shoreline Redesignation 0 Site Development Permit O Zoning Variance 0 Boundary Line Adjustment O Conditional Use Permit l:J/ Short Subdivision O Reuse of Public Schools ~ Formal Subdivision D Special Use Permit 0 Urban Planned Development D Zone Rec!asslfication 0 Plat Alteration O Site.Specific Comprehensive Plan Amendment 0 Plat Vacation O P-Suffix Amendment D Road Variance D Special District Overlay Removal D Drainage Vaiiance or Adjustment O Reasonable Use Exception 0 Right-of-Way Use Permit O Public Agency & Utility Exception 0 Shoreline Exemption D Period Review for Mining Sites D Critical Areas Alteration Exception ·p A 5 O Ill\ -J I -r"', 0 Linear 12,E.-Aff.:tl:-~ D r1r1,?.--rc;/L/ D Non-linear ~ S /..A-fT~ , being duly sworn, state that I am the<>WAer.or .a.. (print name) AfPll~I officer of the corporation owning property described in the legal description filed with this application and that l have reviewed the rules and regulations of the Departl"l'.lent of Development and Environmental , Services (DOES) regarding the preparation and filing of this application and that all statements, answers and information submitted with this application are in a!I respects true, accurate and complete to the best of my.knowledge.and belief. ~ Af'PU.CANT' STA-TVS' fisit-->.'\ During the review of this application, it may be necessary for DOES staff to make one or more site visits. By signing this application form, you are giving permission for these visits. If it is rental property, the owner hereby agrees to notify tenants of f:!OSsible site visits. (Slef?A SlAfilN printed name 9,1.20 NE ~)..D-rt. Pk-:!F°lOO mailing adress /} 1(-l (2..1,L. l--b-,l D 1 'vi/A qB9 31 city state zip If applicable, state below, the name, address and telephone number of the authorized applicant for this application as shown on the Certification and Transfer of Appftcation Status form filed with this application. . __ SfrM.. SN{Aam1Te 5{\), CAYJ.1 IA~ ___ lf ___ _ ,, v vy v /-mailing address /I /I Telephone city state zip Application for Land Use PermitslglFORM lc-app-luper.pctf 2104105 ( ~ a, C: .E "' ~ >< w = c:: "' ·.:: rr,O "' I a, :c "" >, ·-ci <= 2 ci -0 =, ID 0 -2 > C> ~ E ·m Cl) = u <= X (!) Q) ;:z w ""' 0: • • • For Fonnal Subdivisions only: Martin Property Name of Subdivision Nick A. Yinger, PLS Registered Land Swveyor Rebecca s. Cushman, PE Engineer Sara Slatten Developer Land Surveyor's Certification I hereby certify that the accompanying plat has been inspected by me and conforms to all rules and regulations of the platting resolution and standards for King County, Washington Signed~d~ Date t2 P ~ 2 7 ~ t2 5 The fees for the application will be paid: • Triad Associates Name 12112 115th Avenue NE Kirkland, WA 98034 Address and Zip '.f25) 821-8448 Telephone Number Triad Associates Name 12112 115th Avenue NE Kirkland, WA 98034 Address and Zip CamWest Real Estate Development Name 9720 NE 120th Place, Ste. 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 Address and Zip 425) 825-1955 Telephone Number Land Surveyor Seal EX-!>IRES / Z •/eJ • &> t; t:,9-.27-05' !B"" deposit at submittal and remainder to be paid upon receipt of fee estimate D deposit at submittal and remainder through a monthly installment plan (maximum of 9 months) Note: Application forms and submittal requirements are subject to revision without notice. Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Application for land Use PermitslglFORM lc-app-luper.pdf 2/04/05 Page 2 of 2 • <® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6800 TTY 206-296-7217 General Information • Preliminary Subdivision Applications: Instructions For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. The following is a summary of the preliminary subdivision application process and a description of the application submittal requirements. The information required for a preliminary subdivision application is necessary in order to evaluate the merits of a proposal with applicable County and State regulations and to assess the potential environmental impacts. The environmental checklist will be the basis for determining if an environmental impact statement will be required prior to any approval of a proposed subdivision. An application will be evaluated on the basis of the information provided by the applicant, the King County Comprehensive Plan, pertinent provisions of the King County Code, site inspection, testimony and evidence presented at the public hearing, and comments submitted by interested public agencies. Copies of the King County Codes and Comprehensive Plan are available for inspection at the ODES Permit Center and at the Main Branch of the Seattle Public Library. King County Codes and other development regulations are also available on the Internet via the King County Web site at http://www.metrokc,gov/. Questions related to preliminary subdivisions may be answered by calling or contacting: Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Telephone: 206-296-6600 Pre-Application Conference A pre-application conference with Land Use Services Division (LUSD) staff is required prior to filing a subdivision application. Pre-application request forms and instructions for filing a pre-application conference request are available at the DOES Permit Center. A filing fee is required at the time a request is made, the amount to be determined at the time of the filing and based on the latest adopted fee ordinance. LUSD staff will schedule the pre-application conference within thirty (30) days from the date of the request. Filing an Application A subdivision application must be filed in person at the ODES Permit Center. An appointment with a Zoning Technician is required to file the application. Please call 206-296-6797 to schedule the appointment. The minimum submittal requirements necessary to file the application are described below, under Application Documents. LUSD staff has twenty-eight (28) days from the date of filing to determine whether or not the application is complete. An application that fails to meet the submittal requirements described herein will be deemed incomplete. Notice of Application Fourteen (14) days after LUSD staff determines that the application is complete, a public notice is issued as follows: PraUmlnary Subdivision Applications -lnstrudlonslgl fo,.ins-psubap.pdf 2/3105 • • A. LUSD sends out a notice of application to property owners within a 500-foot radius of the subject property. If the area is rural or lightly populated, the notice must be mailed to at least 20 different property owners; or, in other appropriate cases, the Division may determine It is necessary to notify additional property owners. B. A notice of the application will be published by LUSD in the official county newspaper and another newspaper of general circulation. C. The applicant is required to install a notice board, which must be placed in a conspicuous place on the property throughout the permit process so that it is visible to people passing by the property. Additional notice boards may be required as determined by LUSD. The cost of the board is the applicant's responsibility. LUSD will send the applicant written instructions regarding the specific requirements for the notice board. D. Notice of the application is also provided to anyone who writes to the Division requesting information regarding the proposal. Compliance with the State Environmental Polley Act (SEPAi Proposed subdivisions are subject to the procedural and substantive requirements of SEPA (see WAC 197-11 and K.C.C. 20.44). Prior to the public hearing on the subdivision, DDES will issue its SEPA threshold determination, which is appealable to the Hearing Examiner. If the DDES determination of non-significance (DNS) or mitigated determination of non-significance (MDNS) is appealed, the SEPA appeal hearing is combined (i.e., heard at the same time) with the subdivision hearing. Public Hearing A public hearing will be held by the King County Hearing Examiner at which time all evidence supporting or opposing the proposal will be heard. LUSD will issue a written report and recommendation 14 days prior to the scheduled hearing date. As mentioned above, if a SEPA appeal is filed, the SEPA appeal hearing will be heard by the Hearing Examiner at the same lime as the subdivision hearing. If other applications, such as a rezone, shoreline substantial development permit, and/or street vacation are proposed or required in conjunction with the subdivision, they may be scheduled for the same hearing. The Hearing Examiner will render a written decision, which is appealable to the King County Council. Appeal Affected parties may appeal the Hearing Examiner decision on a preliminary subdivision to the King County Council. The Examine(s report includes information on the method of appeal available and the lime limit within which an appeal must be filed. Preliminary Approval/Disapproval Preliminary approval or denial by the Hearing Examiner is final unless appealed to the King County Council. If appealed, the King County Council will render a final decision. An appeal of the Council's decision may be filed with the King County Superior Court. Final Approval The final plat must be recorded within sixty (60) months oflhe effective date of the preliminary approval. PreUmlnary SubdMslon Applicatlons -lnstructlonslgl 1e-1ns-psubap.pdf 2/3ftl5 Page2of6 • • Application Documents Required for Submittal The following documenls are required to be submitted at the time an application is filed in order to be determined complete. J 1. Land Use Permit Application: Complete and submit one original plus two (2) copies. J2. .J 7. Assesso(s Map(s\: Submtt one set of current Assesso(s maps of the property to be subdivided, including adjoining properties under the same ownership as the property being subdivided. The map(s) must cover all properties within 500 feet of the subdivide(s ownership. Outline the boundaries of the proposed subdivision in red. Outline adjoining ownership in yellow. If Assesso(s maps are stamped "see enlargement," include the enlargement copy with your application. Prints ofthe Assesso(s maps must be ordered from the Department of Assessments, Room 700A, King County Administration Building, 500 -4th Avenue, Seattle, WA, phone 2()6..296-7300. Legal Description: Submit three (3) copies, typewritten on sheet size 8-1/2" X 11", white bond paper. The legal description of the subject property may be obtained from the office of the King County Assessor. The legal description must correspond precisely with property outlined in red on the Assesso(s map. Proof of "Legal'' Lot Status: Submtt documentation of the date and method of segregation of the subject property. Environmental Checklist: Submit twenty (20) copies. Please refer to instruction on the Environmental Checklist form. The applicant will be contacted by the Land Use Services Division if addttional information is required. Failure to respond may cause postponement of consideration of your request. If an EIS has been prepared for this proposal, please submit three (3) copies with your application. Certificate of Water Availability: Submit three (3) copies. Preliminary approval for the creation of a new water system in accordance with the provisions of the applicable Coordinated Water System Plan or for the connection wtth a private well from the Seattle-King County Department of Public Health; or The Certificate of Water Availability form concerning water availabiltty to the stte must be given to the appropriate existing water purveyor (water district; city; water association) to complete and then returned with this application. Al the top of the form, a space is provided for a description of the site. In this space, the legal description of the site should be inserted or attached on a separate sheet if tt is too lengthy. For sites located in the Urban Growth Area, if the development is not proposing to be served by an existing or new Group A water system at the time of construction, a Certificate of Future Connection must be given to the appropriate Group A water purveyor to complete and then returned with this application . Certificate of Sewer Availability/Septic Availability: Submit three (3) copies. a. For sites located within the Urban Growth Area: The Certificate of Sewer Availability form concerning sewer availability to the site must be given to the appropriate agency (sewer district, city) to complete and then returned with this application. At the top of the form, a Preliminary SubdMskm Applications· lnstructionslgl lc-lns-psubap.pdf 2/3!05 Page 3 of6 17. • • space is provided for a description of the stte. In this space, the legal description of the site should be inserted or attached on a separate sheet if it is too lengthy. b. For sites located outside the Urban Growth Area: Preliminary approval for individual or community on-site sewage disposal systems from the Seattle-King County Department of Public Health must be submitted wtth this application. Preliminary Plat: Submit thirty-five (35) prints of the proposed plat prepared by a licensed land surveyor (RCW 18.43). In addition, submit one plat map reduced to fit on an 8-1/2" X 14" sheet. All prtnts shall be folded so they will frt into a legal file folder with the name of the subdivision visible. The information on the plat checklist must be shown on the face of the preliminary plat. Fire District Receipt: Obtain from the fire district. Submtt three (3) copies. Level-One Drainage Analysis: Submit eight (8) copies. Transportation Certificate of Concurrency: Submit three (3) copies. Subdivision Density and Dimensions Worksheet: Submit three (3) copies. Certificate/Affidavit of Critical Areas Compliance: Submtt three (3) copies. Applicant Status Form: Submit three (3) copies. Variance decisions required per King County Code 21A. if applicable: Submit three (3) copies. A list of other issued or pending permits or decisions related to the proposal: Submit three (3) copies. Preliminary Application Fees: Consult the current fee schedule or discuss with ODES staff for the appropriate fees to be paid at the time of application. Pre-application Credit Form or Pre-application Meeting Waiver Form: Submit one (1) copy. Tltle Report: Submit three (3) copies of a Tltle Report issued within 30 days of application, showing all persons having an ownership interest, a legal description describing exterior boundary of application site and listing all encumbrances affecting the site. Field Topographic Base Map: Submtt eight (8) copies of field topographic base map. Conceptual Drainage Plan: Submit eight (8) copies of a conceptual drainage plan prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Washington. This plan must show the location and type of the existing and proposed flow control facilities existing and proposed water quality facilities and existing and proposed conveyance systems (2.2.1 1998 SWDM). Additional Information: Any additional information, such as sketches, engineering reports, petitions, photographs, etc., that may clarify or explain the proposal or will assist in assessing the potential impact may be submitted with the application. The Land Use Services Division or the Hearing Examiner may at any time request additional information or studies for these purposes. Provide eight (8) copies of any additional information. Preliminary SubdMsloo Appllcatlons-lnstructlonslgl lc-lns-psubap.pdf 2/3/05 Page 4 of6 • • The following must be shown on the plat: 1. Name of proposed subdivision with a limit of 32 letters and spaces. 2. Name, address, phone number, signature, and seal of registered land surveyor and registered engineer. 3. Name, address, and phone number of developer. 4. Name, address, and phone number of owner. 5. Section, Township, Range of subdivision. 6. Acreage of subdivision. 7. Number of lots, units, and proposed density. 8. Existing zone classification. 9. Proposed use (i.e., townhouse, single-family detached). 10. Means of sewage disposal; if sewer district, include name. 11. Source of water, if water district, include name. 12. School district. 13. Fire district. 14. Telephone service. 15. Power source. 16. Legal description -type or print. 17. Field topography and verification. 18. Vicinity map showing sufficient area and detail to clearly locate the subdivision in relation to surrounding roads, parks, rivers, and municipal boundaries with tts scale. Graphic representation shall show the following: 1. North arrow and scale. Recommended scale-1" to 100' or 1" to 50'. 2. Indicate by a heavy line the boundaries of the subdivision. 3. Use heavier line weight for streets so they will stand out from the lots and contour lines. 4. Dimension all lots and streets to the nearest foot. 5. Label all streets, existing and proposed. Identify areas of proposed dedication and purpose. 6. Verified field survey, with contour intervals of either 2 feet or 5 feet (see Surface Water Design Manual for specifics) within the boundaries of the proposal. For land inside the urban growth boundary, contour intervals shall be at 2-foot intervals when slopes are 15% or less and 5-foot intervals for slopes exceeding 15%. PreDmlnary SubdMsion ApplicaUons. lnstructlonslgl lc-lns--psubap.pdf 2/3/05 Page 5of6 • • 7. Show all existing structures and parcels in their appropriate locations both within the proposed subdivision and within 100 feet of the boundaries of the proposed subdivision. Indicate whether or not the on-site structures will be removed or relocated. 8. Number lots consecutively from 1 to the total number of lots. 9. Locate and show all critical areas and hydrologic features within 500 feet of the boundaries. Indicate if streams are intermittent and the limits of any wetlands. Estimate the limits of the 25-year floodplain for streams and 100-year floodplain for rivers. Provide names of all water features and all drainage basins served by or containing these features. A critical area includes erosion hazards, landslide hazards, steep-slope hazards, avalanche, flood plain, wetland, aquatic area, wildlife habitat conservation area, wildlife habitat network, and/or critical aquifer recharge areas. 10. Designate any qualifying critical area per K.C.C. 21A.24 as a tract and include appropriate buffers and BSBLS. 11. If tracts are to be set aside for nonresidential uses or reserved for future development, label such tracts and indicate their proposed use. 12. If electrical transmission lines cross the subject property, show locations of poles and towers. Place all regional utility lines crossing the site in tract(s). 13. Provide adjacent existing zoning. 14. Identify substantial grading required outside of proposed or existing right-of-way. 15. Show site distance for entry to all county roads. 16. Show existing and proposed sewers, water mains, culverts, or other underground facilities within tract. 17. Show location, widths and names of all existing, adjoining, or prior platted streets or other public ways, railroad and utility rights-of-way, parks, and other public open spaces. · 18. Show any existing easements on the subject property. Provide title documents for existing easements along with descriptive recording instruments. 19. Show location of all physical and legal description encroachments affecting the boundary between the application site and the adjoining parcels. Encroachments may be from the application site onto the adjoining parcels or from the adjoining parcels onto the application site. Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Prellm!na,y SubdMslon Applications-lnstructionslgl lc,.lns-psubap.pdf 2f.W5 Paoe 6 of6 ..! • ® IClng Collllty Depat1men1 al -lopment arMI lalWlroftn\Dllllll Semoes 900 Oakndale A\1811ue Scu1hWest Renton, Washlnglon OOOSS-1219 2~ TTY206s296-7217 FOR CURRENT OWNER: • Certification & Transfer of Applicant Status Alternative formats available upon request Pennlt Number. TBDlt$PcoFJ I, k IF Al 1\1 Ft::\-\ A , J\A A !?,:;(..'-tl------··--. (print name) hereby certify that I am an/the owner or the property which Is the subject of th,s application for permit or approval. If I am not the sole owner of the property, I certify that 111111 authorized by any and all other cwner.i of the proJ)81'W to make thle certlflcation and transfer any an all lights I/we have It> apply for this permit or approval to the person listed below. I, thel8fore certify that .. 51tA: S!A-T[Bc,.)1 CMJ ~ (pnnt name) is the "applicant" for this permit or approval and shall remain the •app11canr for the duration otthlS pennlt or approval unlosc ";,pplicont" etabJe le transferred In wr11ine on a form provided by !hie dopartmont. By being 1M "applicant." that indlvldual assumes financial rn,pon§lblllty for all fa and will RlC8iv8 any refunds paid. I certify under penalty of peijury under the laws of the state of Washington that the folegolng rs true and correct ~ Pl ~Stwly....Vfir~ CS-~i,, -05' SigmdureofOwner "B'{ P.O . .L\, Date Signed FOR INDMDUAL8; I. --·---· ___ . (pllnt name) hereby certify that I am the "applicant" for this permit or approval. I &llall l'elll$1n Iha 'appffcanf' 1br the duration of this permit or approval unle&II "applicant'' status is transt'elr8d In wrlllng on a form provided by this depal1ment I accept ffnanctal @Jw.l'.Nl!;!ll!IY .fl>J:. a)I JM11 associated with this pennlt or approval and wtn meetve any refunds. My mailing address ls: I certify under penalty of perjury under the law,;, of the Slate of Washington that the fo,egolng rs true and correct Signature, of Applicant Dale Signed OR · 1, , • t name) hereby certify that I am an authori2Aad agent:C ,_.kO WI#( ..&COIJIOJationorolherbusiness FORC~=~TI:: · B!r.lOClation ~~ ofWashing1x>n anel that this business association Is the "applicant" for lhis pennlt er approval end !I ftnanebaUy r-M.,.ibla for all l\,ea and wm recelw a~ refunds paid. Thi$ association shatl 181118in the "appli<;anf' for the duration of this pem,it or approval unlus "applicant' status is transfened in writing on a fD~vlded by this department The maffing address of this business association ill: crz20 _ _NE. ___ I PL-*L~ I?:/ 124-1 At:,/ P; "'1~0 I c;,erlify under penalfy of perjury under the laws or tne State OI wasntngTDn tnat the foregoing iS true and correct ~ -~ q~.2~~os-· . , Signature ~ Date Signed ~116\1 U::80..f; Cop l ...,..,,.,.. .... ..,.,,,..,....... Y; Cec!irialcion&Tronafer~fAppllcanlsta1usFORM ,.....,.-tn,pstat.pdf . 05/30/030 rn D w @fo\ Page1cf2 SCP 2 8 211li l.':) ~ K.C. D.D.E.S. lY l0 391/d 111/c!d 3A31S L05S1LL9lv· 01:50 900l/Ll/50 .. • • NOTICE TO APPLICANTS• By IAw, u,11 dopar1ment roturn• all engineoring and other piano to the appfteanl If, however, you wish 1o authorize the department ID return engineering and other plans directly ID the engineer, architect, or other consultant fp[ tlle llmlted purpose of making coqecflons, please designate below: O I authoriZe thl& department to return plans directly to my consullant(s) for the Rmited purpose of making comictlons, as designated on this fonn. CONSULTANTS: -------------------~---···~-----·~-----·--·--.... -----··--~----- -----------------------------··· --------·--·--·----------·--···""" __ _ --------------·· ... _ .. _______ _, __ _ ·-·····--···--·-·--·--·--·· --······-· ····-···------------'-------------------·-............. ,_ ............. . --------------------·····--------· .. ·----.---------------------------- C/redr out the DDES Web all& at www.met,pkc.qovlddy Cer1lllcelklo & T....-af Applcar,t Slalll!F011M ~1¢f 0&'30/03 ' Page2 ol2 : I @ E0 3:)1/d Hllcld 3/\31S l059 'CLLSZ:1> '---·· ---------------.. • • ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Certification of Applicant Status Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Pennlt Number: Activity Number: L OSF'00/9 Pennit Name: FOR INDIVIDUALS: I, (print name), hereby certify that I am ------------------- the/ an owner of the property which is the subject of this permit. If I am not the sole owner of the property, I certify that I am authorized to represent all other owners of the property. My mailing address is: I further certify that I am the "Applicant" for this permit and as such am financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. I shall remain the "Applicant" for the duration of this permit unless I transfer my "applicant" status in writing on a form provided by DOES. * Signature of Applicant Date Signed -OR- FOR CORPORATIONS/BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS: I, ,')Ai.A SlA1fptJ (print name), hereby certify that I am an authorized agent of CJd'll l/1E6'[WIEt n ~. a corporation or other business association authorized to do business in the StateofWashington, which is the sole owner of the property that is the subject of this permit. If this corporation or business association is not the sole owner of the property, I certify that this corporation/business association is authorized to represent all other owners of the property. The mailing address of th· corporation/business association is: D @©@: il W.@fo' SEP 2 8 2005 /_!:V K.C. D.D.E.S. I further certify that the above named corporation/business association is the "Applicant" for this permit and as such is financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. This corporation/business association shall remain the "Applicant" for the duration of this permit '."'M """""~;ra~:;• fum p,w;ded by D:,f.,~J inaureoflicant'sAgent Date Signed ie lf"<"P'f MAI~ fl\\.& "'y * By signing as the Applicant or the Applicant's Agent, I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the information provided above is true and correct. Certification of Applicant StatusFORM lc-cer-apstat.pdf 01/08104 Page 1of2 ------------· -------- • • NOTICE TO APPLICANTS: By law, this department returns all engineering and other plans to the applicant. If, however, you wish to authorize the department to return engineering and other plans directly to the engineer, architect, or other consultant for the limited purpose of making corrections, please designate below: D I authorize this department to return plans directly to my consultant{s) for the limited purpose of making corrections as designated on this form. CONSULTANTS: Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Certification of Applicant StatusFORM lc-cer-apstat.pdf 01/08104 Page 2 of2 @ EXHIBIT "A" •• Order No. CS -20096926 JY1A/1ir1 f~ u1ttt THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W. M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 16 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THE EAST 150 FEET THEREOF; AND THE SOUTH 14 FEET OF THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE EAST 150 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTH~AST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10; EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND ROAD PURPOSES OVER THE NORTH 16 FEET OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. L05POOl9 {(!» King County ODES • DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Wa 98055-1219 This certific rovides the Seattle King County Department of Public Health and the Department of Development and Environmental Services with information necessary to evaluate development proposals. King County Certificate of Water Availability Do not write in this box number D Building Permit D Short Subdivision name IBJ Preliminary Plat or PUD D Rezone or other _______ _ Applicant's name: Camwest Development Inc. Proposed use: Preliminary Plat, 13 lots, 1 irrigation Location: 12439 148"' Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 K.C. D.D.E.S. (attach map and legal description if necessary) Water purveyor information: 1. D a. Water will be provided by service connection only to an existing_(size) water main that is fronting the site. OR IBJ b. Water service will require an improvement to the water system of: D (1) feet of water main to reach the site; and/or D (2) The construction of a distribution system on the site; and/or IBJ (3) Other (describe) DE Agreement & all related Easements required. Main distance and offsite mains to be decided at the pre-design meeting. Fire Hydrants to be installed per Fire Marshall. 2. IBJ a. The water system is in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan. OR D b. The water system improvement is not in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan and will require a water comprehensive plan amendment. (This may cause a delay in issuance of a permit or approval). 3. IBJ a. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city, or is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyor. OR D b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. IBJ a. Water will be available at the rate of ftow and duration indicated below at no less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant 400 feet from the building/property (or as marked on the attached map): Rate oF flow at Peak Demand D less than 500 gpm (approx. ___ gpm) D 500 to 999 gpm IBJ 1000 gpm or more D ftow test of ________ gpm D calculation of gpm Duration D less than 1 hour D 1 hour to 2 hours li1I 2 hours or more D other ____ _ (Note: Commercial building permits which includes multlfamlly structures require ftow test or calculation.) OR D b. Water system is not capable of providing fire ftow. 5. IBJ a. Water system has certificates of water right or water right claims sufficient to provide service. OR D b. Water system does not currently have necessary water rights or water right claims. Comments/conditions: Fees per lot = GFC @ $3,200, Meter Drop @ $450, WAC@ $125 = $3,775.00 per lot FEES SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE I certify that the above water purveyor information is true. This certification shall be valid for 1 year from date of signature. KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT #90 LESTER PIELE Agency name Signatory ~e SUPERINTENDENT ~ ?~ Title ' Signafure Z:\Water Availability Certificatcs\Water Availability\CamWest, 12439 148th.doc RENEWAL FEES: W/ IN 1 YEARJi:00 AFfER 1 YEAR $ 6\7 !f::/IJ..fl: 9/13/05 Date LOSP001, COpt ' ' .... ., ---, .. -.... ·~· • • SANITARY SEWER AVAILABILITY FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CITY OF RENTON 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: (425) 430-7200 Fax: (425) 430-7300 TOBEFILLEDOUTBY APPLICANT: 1~ FLAHw-,Y Date of Request 9-]-05 Applicant'sName: CAm~ D1z'.\&:L0e PhoneNo. (LJJS)~-l'l)-S- Mailing Address: 97 2..0 tJ E. I J-Dt1. PL- City l'-:1 iZ:-1?:I AN D State INA;: Zip Code 9,'lD S + Check one: Proposed Single Family Home Existing Single Family Home On Septic Proposed Lot Short Plat Other(Specify) p1,;AT : 13 Lors D D D Location/Address: ___,/f"'~'-'9...._3~")+-_,_/L/::~~--'----'--A-JIE'-="'--'SE.=---------- King County Tax Account No:. _ _,_,/ O.,_J........,3,.,,Dc..S...,_,CJ,_.,..,~,..8c..S.....,_ _______ Legally Described as: A-1[Ctfo ' THIS APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE A COPY OF THE PROPOSED SITFJPLOT PLAN. INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CITY: I. D or D 2. Sanitary Sewer Service will be provided by side sewer connection only to an existing ___ size sewer main located within ________________________ _ City records show a side sewer stub to the property D Y D N Sanitary,~ewer service will require an extension~~u/lf ~ of e size sewer main located within · ~ ~KC: The proposed development lies within -----------service area; therefore, the applicant shall contact The District/Agency at (phone) for sewer availability. See attached letter dated ---'i6=1..1Y.<:e:.a:=-1::.:·t----~==,1-I .,_1_PD=.<...;£:_._ __________ _ Payment of all applicable system development fees: (Fees are subject to change without notice) -System Development Charge: -Residential building sewer permit: -Latecomers. special assessment fees: -Right of Way Fee -Right of Way Bond (Refundable) $ 900 $ 60 $ __ _ LDSPODIC, per single family residenceMA.6N C::86..fl: per single family residence C()py {over) K.C. D.D.E.S. ,:., . Sanitary Sewer Availability Fo, • Page2 Reference data ______ ·~··~--· =~~~==-~-iz .. · _._~~=~------------3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. ~ D Applicant sball abandon the existing septic system in accordance with Section 1119 of the corrent Uniform Plumbing Code and Section 4-6-040.I.6 of the City Code. Customers making a first time connection to sanitary sewers in King County, including Renton's Sewer Service Area, are subject to a sewage treatment capacity charge. The purpose of this King County charge is to pay for building sewage treatment capacity to serve newly connected customers. Single- family customers pay $34.05 a month (billed by King County as $204.30 every six months) for 15 years. At the customer's choice, this fee may be paid to King County as a lump sum of $4,136.93. This fee is in addition to the monthly charge for treatment that Renton is required to collect and pass to King County. The Renton portion of the Wastewater Utility Rates for customers outside the city limits is 1.5 times the standard rate for customers inside the city limits. (City Code section·8-5-15C) The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the City of Renton or has been granted King County Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval for extension of service outside the City .. or D Annexation or BRB approval will be necessary for the provision of sanitary sewer service. 15 or D ! The sewer system improvement is in conformance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan. The sewer system improvement will require an amendment to the Renton Long-Range Wastewater Management Plan. The sewer system improvement will be within an existing franchise from King County allowing the installation of facilities in the County Right(s)-ofWay. or D The sewer system improvement will require that Renton obtain a franchise from King County to install the facilities in the County Right(s)-ofWay. CONDmONS OF CERTIFICATION: 1) It is the responsibility of the owner/developer to verify, by an engineering study, whether it is possible to connect by gravity line to the existing City sewer system (a private lift station may be installed, but is not desirable). The City may require, at it's option, the verification to be in the form of a letter signed by a professional civil engineer. 2) When new sanitary sewer lines are installed, the City typically installs or requires to have installed stub-outs to the property line. This is done as a courtesy to the property owners. The City does not guarantee a stub for all properties nor does it guarantee the condition or location of the stub. It is the responsibility of the owner/contractor to have an approved connection from the building sewer to the City's sewer main. If there is a stub, it is in good condition, and the owner/contractor can locate it, then it is available for use. The determination of condition of existing sanitary sewer stubs shall be the sole responsibility of the City and the City's decision shall be fmal. If the stub is broken or the City inspector determines that the stub's condition is not acceptable, it sball be the owner/contractor's responsibility to repair the stub, replace the stul? at the existing tee, or to install a new stub and tee directly into the main. The method of repair/replacement to be determined by the City's inspector. sewer information is true. This certification sball be valid for one year from date is subje to change without notice). ---r-.... Wastewater Utility Section dc/pwssavail.doc Rentonnet pwssavail 12/04 bh • LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PACEL # 1023059383 • 102305 383 S 1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 LESS N 16 FT LESS E 150 FT LY S OF N 14 FT THOF LESS CO RD • I ,. ,.;. • CIT~F RENTON ,.ll, . Kathy Keolk~r-'fheeler, Mayor Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator Sept~mber 26, 2005 Sara Slatten Cam West Development · 9712 N.E. 12o•h Place, Suite 100 Kirklirnd, WA 98.034 • SUBJECT: SANITARY SEWER AVAILABILITY·-, 12439148':' AVE. S.E .. KCPID NO 102305-9383 13-LOT MARTIN PLAT Dear Ms.' Slatten: This·letter shall serve as a supplement to the sewer availability prepared for this proposed · · de.velopment dated September 26, 2005. Sanitary sewer service from the City is avail/Ible to serve ihis proposed development. Sewer is directly available to this proposed plat. The developme.nt will be responsible to provide all sewer extensions to adjacent rights-of-way and within the actual developm'ent. Initial review indicates that this.development will serve into th'e C[ty's exi~ting system in th, plat of Shamrock. · · · · · · This sewer availability is also conditioned upon the requirement that a covenant to annex document be executed prior to the recording <if the proposed plat. This document will-be forwarded to you prior to the recordi!]g of the plat; Fees for this plat will includ~ System Development Charges of$900.00 per lot, Special Assessment District charges for the East Renton System, $60 per lot side sewer permit fees, right'. · of-~ay fee and bond to be determined upon submittal, inspection and plan review fee· of 5% of ·estimated construction cost, and a Kjng County permit fee equal to (00% ofcosts bilied by the · · County to the City. Please note t~at fees·are subject to,~ha:nge without nbtice. If you hav any questions r'garding this availability, please ·contact me at 425-430; 7212. . . II :F;1, Sys\WW\0~~1~:~:~G~~iwa~o_c~~~~oo~.d~~shin·;:~";'9":8~~''"''" "':oil Martin Jette~ •. @ This paper contains 50% r8CYc1~ m~terial, 30%'postconsumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE Department of Development and Environmental Services • ® King County • 900 Oakesdale Avenue p• D • f • f R • f Renton, WA 98055-1219 Ire IS fIC eceI p Fire District# /(C:f}) 'it dS Name of Project I Proposal _M._,M:;_,_,_:f~l_N_·_y_.__Q-=Q_..\:'-=~-'----'-----------~------ 1'2.11'2"' \• l Ii t"' ri.. •--• ...-,-;; .o = rm , 1 w Pr '11.,,.C':;b Location of Project/ Proposal __ "lc.;v:__ 1-----',_,_'b __ '"'_""'-o=""'---'·N::A-=:.......i~JV.,,_N_,__1 _ ____:l_ov ________ _ (Address, parcel number, tax account number, legal description)' 'One of these required for processing of application I lJ 'J..3o ':> i'> '<'o -?~ tf SEC fe \ {) TWN '). '? RNG. 5 KROLL PAGE ____ _ Name of Applicantlfw.l,.. ~,'( 1 ~\ \)~~~11\tJC... . AddressofApplicant '\11-Q ~ \1.D'tlt f~. GlA.\W \l\l.J l(.\t-.Jl,.\...Pl'NO ,wit '\fsO?j Telephone Number ±v5 ,t'2...2 -l"\':1'=' e*'· \j1) Description: Type of Project/ Proposal Check appropriate box(es) D Apartment I Multifamily D Commercial / Industrial DRetail . D Residential: Single Family Residence DDuplex ~ubdivision D Short Subdivision I Short Plat DRezone D Conditional Use D Unconditional Use D Planned Unit Development D School/ Classroom DOther (describe) _____________________________ _ D Storz couplings required on Fire Hydrants Issuance of this receipt does not imply an approval, disapproval nor review of referenced project/ proposal. This receipt shall be valid for 30 days from date of signature. 1ijg &. ~ r];)~ U--"'615 Ag Name , &Jn4ri. /}--SStskrrf- Distribution: White: Applicant (see below) Yellow: King County Building Services Division Pink: Fire District Note Applicant: at the time of application to DDES the white copy must be presented with project/ proposal submittal. 0178 (Rev. 9/97) Fire District: mail yellow copy to: King County ~ [c;' (re, [c;' n [Q) Building Services Division D LS ~. LS LI W ~ o 900 Oakesdale Avenue ,..., Renton WA 98055-1219 Sci 2 8 2005 , Attn: Fire Engineering Re: '..,_ .. • • LandAmerica Transnation 14450 N.E. 29'" Pl., #200. Bellevue, WA 98007 Phone: 425-451-7301 800-441-7701 Fax: 425-646-8576 File No.: Title Officer: Reference: Buyer/Borrower(s): Seller(s): Subject Property: SUPPLEMENTALN0.1 TITLE COMMITMENT NO. CS -20096926 CS -20096926 -MT2 Chris Scurti CamWest Development Inc, a Washington corporation Kenneth A. Martin, Unknown 12439 148th Avenue, Renton, WA 98055 Special Exception No. 2 has been amended to rea·d as follows: 2. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES and SERVICE CHARGES, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) Tax Account No.: Year 2005 Billed $6,974.73 1023059383 Paid $3,487.37 Balance $3,487.36 Total amount due, not including interest and penalty: $3,487.36. Levy Code: Assessed Value Land: Assessed Value Improvements: 6867 $415,000.00 $165,000.00 oorn © rn OW ~[ID SEP 2 8 2005 K.C. D.D.E.S. The effective date of the above referenced preliminary commitment is hereby extended to the date of this supplemental subject, however, to any previously issued supplementals and to the addition of the items described above. Dated: September 21, 2005 css Supplemental Transnation Title Insurance Company ~~ MAIN FILE COPY Page 1 of 1 L0SP0o1'7 @ I (.·· rder No.: CS -20096926 LandAmerica Transnation COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1445.0 N.E. zgth Pl., #200 Bellevue, WA 98007 Phone: 425-451-7301 800-441-7701 Fax: 425-646-8576 1. Effective Date: October 20, 2004 at 8:00 a.m. Commitment No.: CS -20096926 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Owners Policy 10-17-92 General Schedule Rate with 10% Escrow discount Proposed Insured: Amount: CamWest Development Inc, a Washington corporation $98S,OOO.OO Premium: $2,232.00 Tax: $ 196.42 Total: $2,428.42 3. Title to the fee simple estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: Kenneth A. Martin, as his separate estate 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Transnation Title Insurance Company ~~ Preliminary Commitment Page 1 of 5 Order No. CS -20096926 EXHIBIT "A'.' THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W. M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 16 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THE EAST 150 FEET THEREOF; AND THE SOUTH 14 FEET OF THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE EAST 150 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10; EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND ROAD PURPOSES OVER THE .NORTH 16 FEET OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. I '() , r. ~rder No. CS -20096926 SCHEDULE B REQUIREMENTS: Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. EXCEPTIONS: Schedule B of the Policy or Policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Standard exceptions set forth on the Commitment Cover. B. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF RCW CHAPTER 82.45 AND SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS THERETO. AS OF THE DATE HEREIN, THE TAX RATE FOR SAID PROPERTY JS 1.78% 2. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES AND SERVICE CHARGES, AS FOLLOWS, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST, PENALTY AND STATUTORY FORECLOSURE COSTS, IF ANY, AFTER DELINQUENCY: (1ST HALF DELINQUENT ON MAY 1; 2ND HALF DELINQUENT ON NOVEMBER 1) TAX ACCOUNT NO.: YEAR 2004 1023059383 BILLED PAID $4,392.85 $4,392.85 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE, NO.T INCLUDING INTEREST AND PENALTY: $0.00. LEVY CODE: 6867 ASSESSED VALUE LAND: $140,000.00 ASSESSED VALUE IMPROVEMENTS: $217,000.00 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BALANCE $0.00 GRANTEE: PURPOSE: SNOQUALMIE FALLS WHITE RIVER POWER COMPANY POLE LINE AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: A PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AUGUST 03, 1904 305589 4. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. 4612 IMPOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED ON JUNE 21, 1996, UNDER RECORDING NO. 9606210966. Page 3 of 5 , <a ~rder No. CS -20096926 SCHEDULE B -continued NOTE 1: ACCORDING TO THE APPLICATION FOR TITLE INSURANCE, THE PROPOSED INSURED IS CAMWEST DEVELOPMENT INC, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION. WE FIND NO PERTINENT MATTERS OF RECORD AGAINST THE NAME(S) OF SAID PARTY{IES). NOTE 2: BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY, ON THE DATE OF THIS COMMITMENT IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS LOCATED ON THE LAND: A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE KNOWN AS: 12439 148TH AVENUE RENTON, WA 98055 NOTE 3: IF YOU WOULD LIKE THE COMPANY TO ACT AS TRUSTEE IN THE PROPOSED DEED OF TRUST, PLEASE NOTE THAT "TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY" MAY ACT AS TRUSTEE OF A DEED OF TRUST UNDER RCW 61.24.010(1). NOTE 4: THE COMPANY REQUIRES THE PROPOSED INSURED TO VERIFY THAT THE LAND COVERED BY THIS COMMITMENT IS THE LAND INTENDED TO BE CONVEYED IN THIS TRANSACTION. THE DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND MAY BE INCORRECT, IF THE APPLICATION FOR TITLE INSURANCE CONTAINED INCOMPLETE OR INACCURATE INFORMATION. NOTIFY THE COMPANY WELL BEFORE CLOSING IF CHANGES ARE NECESSARY. CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS MUST INDICATE THAT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY ALL PARTIES. NOTE 5: THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED, PER AMENDED RCW 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WITHIN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT. PTN SEl/4 SEl/4 STR 10-23N-OSE TAX LOT 9383 NOTE 6: WHEN SENDING DOCUMENTS FOR RECORDING, PLEASE SEND VIA TDS (TITLE DELIVERY SERVICE) IN THE YELLOW RECORDING ENVELOPES WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF THEY MUST RECORD THE SAME DAY, PLEASE CONTACT THE TITLE UNIT FOR SPECIAL DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS. IF THEY MAY BE RELEASED WITHIN 48 HOURS, THEY SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1200 SIXTH AVENUE, SUITE 100 SEATTLE, WA 98101 ATTN: RECORDING DEPT. Page 4 of 5 0. ' / ,.1 Order No. CS -20096926 SCHEDULE B -continued (END OF EXCEPTIONS) Investigation should be made to determine if there are any sewer treatment capacity charges or if there are any service, installation, maintenance, or construction charges for sewer, water or electricity. In the event this transaction fails to close, a cancellation fee will be charged for services rendered in accordance with our rate schedule. Unless otherwise requested or specified herein, the forms of policy to be issued in connection with this Commitment will be the ALTA 2003 Homeowner's Policy, the ALTA 1992 Lender's Policy, or, in the . case of standard lender's coverage, the CLTA Standard Coverage Policy -1990. The Policy committed for or requested may be examined by inquiry at the office that issued the Commitment. A specimen copy of the Policy form(s) referred to in this Commitment will be furnished promptly upon request. BSK Enclosures: Sketch Vesting Deed Paragraphs 3-4 Page S of 5 ( ' . • THIS SKETCH IS PROVIDED, WITHOUT CHARGE, FOR YOUR INFORMATION. IT IS NOT INTENDED TO SHOW ALL MATIERS RELATED TO THE PROPERTY INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, AREA, DIMENSIONS, EASEMENTS, ENCROACHMENTS OR LOCATIONS OF BOUNDARIES. IT IS NOT A PART OF; NOR DOES IT MODIFY, THE COMMITMENT OR POLICY TO WHICH IT IS ATIACHED. THE COMPANY ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY MATIER RELATED TO THIS SKETCH.UNLESS SUCH COVERAGE IS SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED BY THE COVERED RISKS OF THE POLICY. REFERENCE SHOULD BE MADE TO AN ACCURATE SURVEY FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. ..... , ... ~~c •. ~~-,Moo31-r' ·~ ·~ .. -oii:iii:,w·11r.i:r- ' I I -I --· - ... ' I ~ , ..... -...... - ...... -1~ -.. - ti -· w., ! ! SECTION: 10 TOWNSHIP: 23N RANGE: 05E • .. .. t .. ,-------, .... ..,,..., --,---..,...._:_-_J j-, .,, j~~ • ~ ~·- -, ....... ..... -, . ., .. - I I, I ·/. : '~ •.•• I , " - ~. ' '-i I ·, ., J :I ) ., ., .i J j '1LED ,o~ "'co"°"' A[OUflr o, :::: ·;-:., ;(f7J jilt::'! ....• r.:.. . .. ....... •:'.!ll :"-'.:1."·-J';':\-:-.·: ..• c.;,· t. ·-<:t·:.:· ,, THI ·fPAQV;DfD. (i .r.~:.:..;1: \ -:: .. 'tt~']~l -..~,:'~:;;. ' '.\:J..!\\):! :, .. 1.--:,~~.;_·i=:l;. "-' ... . -('; .... ' KING COUNTY ....... \:~If '.~if:~!"i~ • _ ~· EXCISE TAX PAID \ }, 1..~. 'l~ ·J~ 222 Wllllam1 Avenue South " · JUN2 91983 , ,:,, :':~nc:::,,.-.-11; -.... . .................... · . ········· ., '\E072B49 I ;:~i.\i~l~~-.1:i~ '"°"'~-~-~·~·=----R:, --·::·n=··to=·"::···.:::·W:•:.•h:::ln:.:.· g:to=-····n:::----::::--·:::98:.:0:::ss:..: .. =====~:!:::U=ii .. ="'="";."·;.;·,;;--·;...:::=:::...::11W~ll~'1!tW;1 -. ··--11-.::1 ••-.;,: of) I) Statutory Warranty Deed ;·:'.,-;;-. ~ ·· ·•·· o IY \ & ~ t,_ THK CRANTOR WILLIAM K. MARTIN and PATRICIA MARTIN, husband and wife t /I it, for o.nd in cun,ild•rallon o1 Ten Dollars and other_ valuab!e conslder.tlon lnhattdpaid.mnwyundwarrnnl•tn KENNETH A. MARTIN and MARY RUTH MARTIN, husband and wife · 1 the followln1 dnrrib.1d r.1al .. t.nl•, 1lt1.1at.d in th.! c .. unty nl K ng ,St.at.orwa,hin,ton: THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH!AST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION IQ, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANCE 5 EAST, w.~., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, EXCEPT THE NORTH 16 FEET THEREOF AND EXCEPT THE EAST 150 FEET THEREOF; AND THE SOUTH I~ FEET OF THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE EAST 150 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION IOI EXCEPT THE EAST lD FEET THEREOF; TOGETHER WITH AN EASE~ENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS ANO ROAD PURPOSES OVER THE NORTH 16 FEEi OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF .THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, EXCEPT TH~~~F~T THEREOF, '~-~ ~ w w rn@ SEP 28 2005 STATE OF WARIIINnmN II ~ COUNTY OF King On thi• da~· swr-nn11lly 11r,1t•1nrrl tw,rr,,,. m• WIiiiam .K. Martlo. & P•\rl~.!a ... M~r~l.o tn mP knnwn ta hi• 1h .. indl~·idu1d ilr"<'r!h.od in and .,Jw, r11PC'\tlt-d th,, within and ro11,,:oln11 1n11truml'nt, 11 nd arkrlnWINli:..t that . they 1111rwd lhe 1111rne, ' AA . theJ~ .. lrN. and. ~untary art 11nd dttd.. ~nr IM ~~~·:.':~-~frf •nlinned. , .~· .. ,~,,..L\<., :,11t GtV ~ ,a_~~i'·r)',.,~ll~i:r11n1 offldal M'al thi1 .29th• '•~l~:!~~ji·;·a::: N,,1 ~ Publ.C In • r cf Wash- ·. r..idiai..AL.. ..... ' ... .. .. ········ F. 9235 • m83 i((t 0.D.E.S . STATE or WASHINGTON !-rn1 l~TV OF On lhi• d:1y or .......................................................... 19 ...... i.: hflfnn, me, th. "u~dPr!li,:nl'CI, a Nntary Public in and for the Stat• ol Wu jrq:ton, duly cmnmiuiontd and sworn, ~nonally appt"ared ..................... .. and .. to ftM' knuwn lo hr 11,. . ....... Prnid•nt and ....... · .... pt't1ivf'I)' nr....... ... . ....................... ---······;····---...... R ...................................... . tlw mrpnraiinn that P:IU•cutl'd th• rrn'f'Join1 1natN1Mnt, and acli'?"'WINlrNI t,W. Mid im,t,·1.m11"nt In tw lhf' fri'f' and _volunta!)' act and d-.1 ,.f 11:11d cor~. ation. for th• u-and riurJX)ut :h,.,.,n m•ntionNI, and on oath •laltd t t nulhnriz"'1 to Hl'ot'ul• th• •id in•lrumrnt and thllt the seal aiil1~ i~"'ih~-~~~r11t• st•11! of uid rorpnralior •. Wilnf'U !TIY hanJ •nd rJftM11I ..... 1 Mr.to aftlud the day and )'f'ar ftrlt ahov• writtf'h. · N~~-~;;.··j·.~~i·i;··;~· ~nd'"f ;·;; ~-h;· ~i;;~·;·;;·\v .~h·i~~tnn. ruidinl' al MAIN FILE COPY 6) ___ CJ;/ Lospoo;c; 1 l l 1 ! r I '-c .. ="'·""""--~==--·-,,,·•=--__._ ........ --,~ •• I---------:-- CERTIFICATE Wl-lEN RECOROEO RETURN 10: I, the u~.,i~rsigned, ~ Clerk of the City of Renton, Wa:;r.lngton, certify that this Is a true Office of thl!' city d:-rk Renton J..·lunid;"':I bi.lllding and correct copy of_ /, 200 Mut!'\'enul.' :Outh RentocQVA 9tsiJM C, ~ "' L,_ :'.: Subscribed and Seal ~ · ~? -~ . ·. ::·· .~ c: t: ·' ;:-.. u, ..... = -- -=,--CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCB NO. 4612 AN ORDIHANCE OF "rllB CITY OP RENTON, WASllDIGTOli, ESTABLISllING JIN ASSBSSJIBH'l' J>ISTRICT FOR S1JIITARY SRWBII. SERVICE IN A PORTION OP THE SOUTH HIGHLANDS, DEA'.!'Blm DO!IHS, AllI> MAPLEWOOD S1JB-BASD1S AND BSTABLI:SBIJIG TBS AMOUNT Ol!' THE CHARGE UPON CONNECTION TO TIIB FACILITIES . THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SBCTrON I, There is hereby created a Sanitary Sewer Service Special Assessment Distrtct for the area served by.the East Renton Sanitary Sewer Intercepto~ in the northeast quadrant of the City of Renton and a portion of its urban growth area within ' unincorporated Kin~ county, which area is more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. A map of the service area is attached as EXhi.bit "B-• The recording of this document is to provide notification of potential connection and interest charges. While this connection charge may be paid at any time, the ' City does not require payment until. such time as the parcel is connected to and thus benefiting from the sewer facilities. The property may be sold or in any other way change hands without triggering the requirement, by the City, of payment of the charges associated with this district. SECTION II, Persons connecting to the sanitary sewer facilities in this Special Assessment District and which properties I t ::: is s s ci * ~ g < ~ ,., !ii 6! ~ !;; ~ f ~ = l ii: f ! I I ! ' I • l ) ! 1 j ORDJNANCE 4612 have not been charged or assessed with all costs of the East Renton Sanitary Sewer Interceptor, as detailed in this ordinance, shall pay, in addition to the payment of the connection permit fee and in addition to the system development charge, the following additional fees: A. Per Unit Charge. New connections of residential dwelling units or equivalents shall pay a fee of $224.52 per dwelling unit and all other uses shall pay a unit charge of $0. 069 per square foot of property. Those properties included within this Special Assessment District and which may be assessed a charge thereunder are included within the boundary legally described in Exhibit "A" and which boundary is shown on the 0 mc.p attached as Exhibit "B. • SECTION III. In addition to, the aforestated charges, there shall be a charge of 4.11% per annum added to the Per Unit Charge. The . interest charge shall accrue for no more than ten (10) years from the date this ordinance becomes effective. Interest charges will be simple interest and not compound interest. SECTION IV, This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty (30) days after publication'. PASSED BY THE.CITY COUNCIL this 1.0JJl day of~~J~u=n~e~~~-1996. City Clerk 2 I l ! I ' ! i l ' I ' 1 • • ? ' i • ORDINANCE 4612 APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this ~ day of __ J_u_n_e _____ , 1996. Tanner, Mayor Appro~as to form: .. ot:~~..i--12,- Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication, 6/14/96 ORD.576:5/20/96:as. 3 i I J, __________________________ _ 1 1 l ·, Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR THE CITY OF RENTON -EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR Portions of Sections 8, 9, 10. 11, 14. 15. 16. 17, 21 and 22 all In Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. in King County, Washington Section 8, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of Section 8, Township 23N. Range 5E W.M. lying East of the East right-of-way line of SR-405 and South of the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of the East line of said Section 8 with the centerline of NE 7th Street; thence Westerly along said centerline of NE 7th Street to its intersection with the centerline of Sunset Boulevard NE; thence Northerly along the centerline of Sunset Boulevard NE to the North line of the Southeast 1,4 of said Section 8; thence West along said North line to the East right-of-way line of , SR-405 and the terminus of said line. · Section 9, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of Section 9, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. lying South and East of the following deSCI1bed line: · Beginning on the centerline of NE 7th Street at its Intersection with the centerline of Edmonds Avenue NE; thence Easterly along the centerline of NE 7th Street to its intersection with the centerline of Monroe Avenue NE; thence North along said centerline to the South line of the Northeast 1,4 of said Section 9; thence East along said South line to its intersection with the centerline of Redmond Avenue NE; thence Northerly along siud centerline to its intersection with the centerline of NE 10th Street: thence East along said centerline to the East line of siud Section 9 and the terminus of said line. Section 10, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of Section 10, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. lying Southerly and Westerly of the following described line: Beginning on the West line of Section 10 at its lntersectlon with the North line of the South 1h of the North 1h of said Section 10; thence East along said North line to its intersection with the centerline of 142nd Avenue SE; thence Southerly along said centerline to its intersection with the North line of the Southeast 1;., of said Section 10; thence East along said North line to its intersection with the East line of said Section 10 and the termmus of said line. I I l ; ' ! l l l l ' i Legal Description of the Spedtll Assessment District for the City of Renton-East Renton Interceptor Section 11, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of the Southwest \4 of Section 11, Township 23N. Range SE W.M.. Section 14, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. Page2of3 All of that portion of Section 14. Township 23N, Range 5E. W.M. described as follows: All of the Northwest 'A of said section. together with the Southwest \4 of said section, except the South V., of the Southeast V.. of said Southwest V.. and exrept the plat of McIntire Homesltes and 1h of streets adjacent as recorded in the Book of Plats. Volume 58, Page 82, Records of King County. Washington, and except the South 151.55 feet of the East 239.435 feet of Tract 6, Block 1 of Cedar River Five Acre Tracts as recorded in the Book of Plats, Volume 16, Page 52, Records of King County. Washington, less 'h of the street abutting said portion of Tract 6, Block 1, and less Tract 6, Block 2 of said Cedar River Five Acre Tracts, less 1h of the street adjacent to said Tract 6, Block 2, and except the South 82. 785 feet of the East 150 feet of Tract 5, Block 2 of said Cedar River Five Acre Tracts and less 'h the street adjacent to said portion of Tract 5, Block 2. Section 15, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of Section 15, Township 23N, Range SE. W.M., except the Southwest \4 of the Southwest V.. of the Southwest \4 of said section. Section 16, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of Section 16, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M .. except that portion of the Southeast 1-4 of the Southeast \4 of the said Section 16 lying East of the East line of the Plat of Maplewood Division No. 2 as recorded in the Book of Plats Volume 39, page 39, Records of King County Washington and its Northerly extension to the North line of said Southeast 14 of the Southeast \4 of the said Section 16 and except that portion of said section lying Southerly o,f the Northerly tight-of-way line of SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway). Section 17, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of Section 17, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M., lying Northeasterly of the Northeasterly right-of-way of SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway) and Easterly of the East right-of-way line of SR-405 less that portion lying generally West of the East and Southeasterly line of Bronson Way NE lying ' I l I I I l f I I ' 1 l ---------------------------------= Legal Descriptian of the Special Assessment District for the City of Renton -East Renton Interceptor Page 3 o/3 between the South line of the NE 3rd Street and the Northeasterly margin of SR- 405. Section 21, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All that portion of Section 21. Township 23N, R SE W.M. lying Northeasterly of the Northeasterly right-of-way line of SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway) and West of the East line of the Plat of Maplewood Division No. 2 as recorded in the Book of Plats, volume 39, page 39, Records of King County, Washington. Section 22, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of Section 22, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. described as follows: All of the Northwest 1A of the Northeast 1A of said Section 22 lymg Northerly of the Southerly line of the Plat of Maplewood Heights as recorded In the Book of Plats. volume 78, pages 1 through 4, Records of King County, Washington. ' Together with the North 227.11 feet of the West 97.02 of the Northeast 1,4 of the Northeast 1A of said Section 22. ' I l • I ! l l I ! I ! ....-11 ~-~-~. ··-~ •••• ,_=-:,:-: •••• ;--, ....,.....,. -~ • .> __ _, .. ,......"'*"!!!Efr.'<ED( .i..,,...., <-""""'X,X-""""""· »--~--{·~-- Exhibit B EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR Special Assessment District Boundary e SANITARY SEWERS Plmwng/8~ Worb Chrilt~e,Vuneakl 20 May 1996 ·1:24,000 -------City Limits CZT.J.-2] Special Auessinent Distrld I I I I I • ' • • ® King County Affidavit Concerning . Critical Areas·. Deparbnent of Development and Envlronmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW · •-CornpUance Renton; WA 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) FileNumber: T6.D LQSPOOf5 Application Name: MA[2.Tf,:,....l ft20P12#--7Y Project Location: 12.439 14";-£, AvE Sf:. The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says: 1. That the affiant is competent to be a witness herein; 2. That the affiant is the applicant for the above project; 3. That to the best of the affiant's knowledge the critical areas on the development proposal site have not been illegally altered; and 4. That the affiant has not previously been found to be in violation of critical areas regulations for any property in King County, or alternatively, that if there have been any violations, such violations have been/are being cured to the satisfaction of King County. Applican~ 'j-2.7-DS ~iY4A::N,D I IA JA: Date and Place (City and State) I oortfy ""dee pe,,fy of perj",y ""dee lhe Ow, of tt>e S1,te of W..h[ru" th,t tt>e foregoing is true and correct. . D rn @ rn ~ W/ rn [Q) SEP 2 8 2005 K.C. D.D.E.S. Check out the DOES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes · AffidavitSensitiveCriticalAreasCompliance lc-aff-sacomp.pdf 12/19/03 Page 1 of 1 il!l~B"1J IFDU...IE ICOl?V King County SEP A Checklist A. BACKGROUND • • 1. Name of proposed projecl, if applicable: Martin Property 2. Name of applicanl: Cam West Development, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Cam West Development, Inc. 9720 NE 1201h PL, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 · Sara Slatten, ( 425) 825-1955 4. Date check/is/ prepared: September 27, 2004 5. Agency requesting checklist: King County ODES 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Infrastructure Construction: Spring 2007 K.C. D.D.E.S. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? (Jfyes, explain) No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Please refer to the wetland delineation by C. Gary Schulz dated September 26, 2005 and the Soils Report by Associated Earth Sciences "AESI" dated January 27, 2005 9.Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposal directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known I 0. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Required Approvals: Preliminary Plat, Site Development Permit, Final Plat Approval, Individual Building Permit Approvals. 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist Iha/ ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on OP"t this page. f&j.\N f\\..E C SEPA CHECKLIST @ PAGE lof 10 LOSPODI~ • • The Martin Property is a 3. 71 acre site that is proposed to be developed into 13 single- family lots. The proposal also includes preservation of a wetland, a storm detention pond facility and an on site park totaling just over 9,000 square feet. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient iriformationfor a person to understand the precise location of your proposed projecl, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide /he range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The Martin property is located at 12439 148 1h Avenue SE. Site map, topography map, legal descriptions, and parcel I.D. numbers are all included as part of the enclosed submittal. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH A. General description of the site (circle one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other -------- The site ranges from flat to rolling. B. What is the steepest slope on the site (approxima/e percent slope)? Describe location and areas of different topography. The steepest slope on site is approximately 10-15% C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and mulch)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify /hem and note any prime farmland. Please refer to the enclosed soils report from AESI, dated January 27, 2005 for specific soil types and classification. D. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Not Known E. Describe the purpose, type, location and approximate quantilies of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The site will eventually be graded to provide roads, driveways, building pads, and yards for 13 single-family homes. Some outside structural fill may need to be brought onto the site. F. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? Jfso, generally describe. Erosion can occur. However, the King County Surface Water Control manual will be followed to in order to minimize actual erosion. As needed, filter fence, hydroseeding, and other King County approved erosion control measures will be implemented on site to address potential erosion issues. SEPA CHECKLIST PAGE 2of 10 ·--, • • G. About what percentage of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphall or buildings)? Approximately 55% H. Proposed measures lo reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. Filter fence, temporary ponds, hydroseed, straw bales, and other temporary erosion control measures will be utilized in accordance with King County development standards. 2. AIR A. Whal types of emissions to the air would resull from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed: · If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust, diesel and gasoline emissions during construction. Natural gas emissions from fireplaces will increase after home construction due to this proposal. B. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None known C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Construction vehicles will be in proper working order to minimize emissions. 3. WATER A. Surface I. Is /here any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type, location and provide names. If appropriate, slate what stream or river ii flows into. A category IV wetland is located on the property. Please refer the enclosed wetland report from Gary Schulz dated September 26, 2005 for further detail. Also, off-site wetlands are located on the adjacent Shamrock Heights project. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or a<{jacenl lo (within 200 feel) the described waters: If yes, please describe and a/tach available plans. Work will occur outside of the wetland and associated buffer areas. NIA NIA 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quanlilies if known. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note local ion on the site plan. SEPA CHECKLIST PAGE 3of 10 ~·· -' L No No No NIA • • 6. Does the proposal involve any discharge of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. B. Ground 1 . Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. C. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source(s) of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection, transport/conveyance, and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? Ifso, describe. Surface run-off from the site will be routed to an on site storm detention pond, located within a tracts within the SW portion of the site. The water will be collected, stored, and then discharged to existing pipes within the adjacent Shamrock plat. Storm water detention facilities will be designed and constructed to meet King County codes, regulations, and guidelines. Please refer to our Level 1 Analysis prepared by Triad Associates and the Preliminary Plat by Triad for additional storm information. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? Ifso, generally describe. Oil from automobiles could enter the storm system. D. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts if any: Storm detention will be designed to meet or exceed the requirements, codes, and guidelines set forth by King County's Development Standards. 4. PLANTS A. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, cottonwood, maple, aspen, other: evergreen tree: fir, cedar, .Pine, other: Alder shrubs: grass: crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, mi/foil, other other types of vegetation (Please list) The site is predominately pasture land. Please refer to the wetland report by Gary Schulz for a detailed list of plants and trees present on site. SEPA CHECKLIST PAGE 4of 10 • • B. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Trees and shrubs will be removed for development of streets, utilities and building sites. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known D. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures lo preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Street trees will be installed within the property, landscaping installed within the park and detention area and trees will be added to the wetland & buffer. Lot landscaping will be installed once the homes are constructed. S. ANIMALS A. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: 8. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known D. Is the site part of a migration route: ff so, explain. Not known E. Proposed measure to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Trees and landscaping will be installed within the plat and wetland & buffer 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES A. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs: Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity for lighting and natural gas for heating. B. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? ff so, generally describe. Not aware of any effects. C. What kinds of energy conservationfeatures are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Construction will meet all codes, requirements, and guidelines that pertain to site development and single-family home construction per King County Standards. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEAL TH SEPA CHECKLIST PAGE Sof 10 ;• • • A. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk or fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. The potential for a house fire is always a possibility. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. Normal fire, medical, and police emergency services. 2. Proposed measures lo reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: All construction and development to meet or exceed local codes, requirements, and guidelines. B. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic equipment, operation, other)? Traffic noise from adjacent roadways may affect the project. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis ( for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term noise may be created by construction equipment and automobiles. Long-term noise may be created by automobiles. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Short-term measures include keeping all machinery in proper working order and on site work is to occur only within approved operating hours as determined by King County. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE A. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The property contains one single family home and is primarily pasture land for horses and barn animals. B. Has the site been used/or agriculture? If so, describe. Not known C. Describe any structures on the site. One single family home and an outbuilding which will be removed. D. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? All structures will be either removed or demolished. F. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R-4 F. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Urban Medium G. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? SEPA CHECKLIST PAGE 6of 10 NIA • • H. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmenlally sensitive" area? If so, specify. (If unsure check with City) Yes, one category IV wetland I. Approximalely how many people would reside or work in the completed projec/. Approximately 33 people would reside at the Federal Way Property based on 2.5 residents per unit and 13 single family residences. NIA 1. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: K. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compalible with exisling and projected land uses and plans, if any: The site will be developed to meet King County's zoning, comprehensive plan designation, and building code to ensure compliance with the surrounding community. 9. HOUSING A. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? lndica/e whelher high, middle, or /ow-income housing. 13 middle income residences. B. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? lndica/e whether high. middle, or low-income housing. One middle income single-family home. C. Proposed measures lo reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Conformance to King County guidelines. 10. AESTHETICS A. What is Jhe tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including anlennas; what is the principal exlerior building material(s) proposed? Approximately 30 feet tall structures with a combination of siding, cedar shakes, brick & stone accents. B. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstrucled? No obstructions known. C. Proposed measures to reduce or con/rol aesthelic impacts, if any: Homes will feature architectural elements such as front porches, pitched roofs, and craftsman elevations and will avoid repetition of the same exterior. Street trees and landscaping will be planted throughout the site. SEPA CHECKLIST PAGE 7of 10 • • 11. LIGHT AND GLARE A. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce: What time of day or night would it mainly occur: Street lighting and house lighting will be constructed per King County standards. B. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views: Not aware of any potential interference or hazard. C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None known D. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Street lighting and house lighting will be constructed per King County standards. 12. RECREATION A. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? No known public parks are located within the immediate vicinity. No B. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: An on site park will be provided as part of this proposal in accordance with Kin County standards. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION A. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed/or, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known B. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cu/Jura/ importance known to be on or next to the site. None known C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NIA 14. TRANSPORTATION A. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. SEPA CHECKLIST PAGE Bof 10 • \ • • Direct access will be obtained from within the adjacent Shamrock property plat and will eventually be routed to 148 1h Ave SE to the east or to NE 41h Street to the south. B. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop. Yes, transit is located to the south along NE 4th street C How many parking spaces would the completed project have: How many would the project eliminate? Each residence will have parking available with their driveway and attached garage. No parking spaces will be eliminated .. D. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? Is so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private) Additional streets will need to be constructed within the proposed plat. Please refer to the attached site plan. No E. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? IF so, generally describe: F. How many weekday vehicular trips (one way) per day would be generated by the completed project? Less than 20 PM peak trips to any given intersection. G. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Payment of traffic impact fees in accordance with King County ordinances. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES A. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? Jfso, generally describe. Police, Fire, Ambulance B. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Impact fees may be imposed on the project as required by King County. 16. UTILITIES A. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. B. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Water & Sewer are provided by the Lakehaven Utility District. Telephone provided by Verizon. Electricity and gas provided by Puget Sound Energy. SEPA CHECKLIST PAGE 9of 10 ·• • • C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: q _., :J] -0 2 Relationship to signer to project: ~{iUMcJ1 SEPA CHECKLIST PAGE lOof 10 --- ~'® •• • King County Road Services Division Department ofTransportation 201 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104-3856 TYPE OF CERTIFICATE t2J ORIGINAL October 22, 2004 Certificate # 01630 0 CONDITIONAL File Number: 04-10-20-02 Exoires: October 22, 2005 CERTIFICATE OF TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY D Specific conditions are described on the reverse side of this certificate. Pursuant to King County Code, Chapter 14.70 as amended, this certificate confirms that the level of service standard used in the Transportation Concurrency Management program has been satisfied and sufficient road capacity is reserved for the development project described below. IMPORTANT: This certificate does not guarantee a development permit. Other transportation improvements and mitigation wi11 be required to comply with Intersection Standards, Mitigation Payment System, King County road standards, and/or safety needs. I. Applicant Name and Address: Sara Slatten, Camwest 9720 NE 120th Place #100, Kirkland, WA 98034 2. Property Location: a. Property Address:12439 148th Avenue SE b. Development Name: Martin Property c. Parcel Number: 1023059383 3. Type of Development Permit To Be Requested: Formal Plat 4. Proposed Land Use: Single Family Residential 5. Zone Location and Reserved Units: a. Concurrency Zone: 754 Community Planning Area: Newcastle i. Commercial Project -Total Square Feet: 0 ii. Multi-family-Number of Units: 0 iii. Single family -Number of Units: 19 6. This Certificate is subject to the following general conditions: a. This Certificate of Concurrency runs with the land and is transferable only to subsequent owners of the same property for the stated development, subject to the terms, conditions and expiration date listed herein. This Certificate of Concurrency is not transferable to any other property and has no commercial value. This Certificate Expires: October 22, 2005 unless you apply for the development permit described above, prior to that date. If this requirement is not met the King County Department of Transportation reserves the option to cancel your certificate and capacity reservation. When you apply for a development permit with King County's Department of Development and Environmental Seneices (DOES), bring this Certificate of Transportation Concurrency as part of the development application package. If you have any questions, please call (206) 263-4722. Linda Dougherty, Director, Road Services Ot,.i,;i<ift"" Department of Transportation King County, Washington K.C. D.D.E.S. fl!JAOINJ /FBI!..~ «::©? LoSP00/9 • ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 ---------- • Subdivision Density and Dimension Calculations Alternative formats available upon request LoSPOO/CJ File Number (To be filled in by DOES) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION WORKSHEET RELATING TO DENSITY AND DIMENSIONS Several development regulations play a role in the creation of a subdivision within King County. Determining the allowable density, minimum density, and a lot width on a piece of property can be confusing. This worksheet will assist you in correctly applying specific portions of the code and will be used to determine if a proposed subdivision or short subdivision meets the density and dimensions provisions of the King County Zoning Code (Title 21A). This worxsheet is designed to assist applicants and does not replace compliance with adopted local, state and federal laws. Pre-application conferences are required prior to submittal of a subdivision or short subdivision. These conferences help to clarify issues and answer questions. They may save you both time and money by eliminating delays resulting from requests for additional information and revisions. You may call 206-296-6600 to find out how to arrange for a pre-application conference. Worksheet Prepared By: SA'f..A g (A-T[FN Date: 9 -2-7 -bS (Print Name) SubdivisionName: MAfZ..T1N f\2.DPff--1)1 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: I Jg_AA:r:J M f::.DI I )N'\ ~~g:_g=_4 _____________________ ' If more than one Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation or zone classification exists for the property, show the boundary between the land uses or zones and the area within each on the preliminary plat map. If a single lot is divided by a zone boundary, transferring density across zones on that lot may be permitted subject to the provisions of K.C.C. 21A.12.200. Please complete only the applicable portions of this form I. Site Area IK.C.C. 21A.06.11721 also see (K.C.C. 21A.12.0801: Site area (in square feet) is the gross horizontal area of the project site, less submerged lands as defined by K.C.C. 21A.06.1265, and less areas which are required to be dedicated on the perimeter of a project site for the public rights-of-way. __ :fr-"-__ square feet in submerged land (any land below the ordinary high water mark-see K.C.C. 21A.06.825) + -e-square feet in perimeter rights-of-way which will be required to be = :fr Total dedicated 00@ @ @ D 'v!J @ D SEP 28 2005 ill) Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes K.C. D.D.E.S. Subdivision Density and Dimension Calculations 1c-ca1.subden.pdf 12/10/03 MAIN fl~10QPY Calculation: • • i lal 179't: Gross horizontal area of the project site it Total submerged lands and rights-of-way Site area in square feet NOTE: To continue calculations, convert stte area in square feet to acres by dividing by 43,560 ~3~.7~( __ Site area in acres NOTE: When calculating the site area for parcels in the RA Zone, if the site area should result in a fraction of an acre, the following shall apply: Fractions of .50 or above shall be rounded up to the next whole number and fractions below .50 shall be rounded down. Example: If the site area in acres is 19.5 acres (less the submerged land and less the area that is required to be dedicated on the perimeter of a project site for public right-of-way) the site area can be rounded up to 20 acres. No further rounding is allowed. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.080) II. Base Density IK.C.C. 21A.12.030 -.040 tables): The base density is determined by the zone designations(s) for the lot. 4 du/acre Ill. Allowable Dwelling Units and Rounding (K.C.C. 21A.12.070): The base number of dwelling units is calculated by multiplying the site area by the base densfy in dwelling units per acre (from K.C.C. 21A.12.030 -.040 tables). .3.1 l = site area in acres (see Section 1.) X --4+--base density (see Section II) 14:.tol, allowable dwelling units Except as noted below, when calculations result in a fraction, the fraction is rounded lo the nearest whole number as follows: A. Fractions of .50 or above shall be rounded up; and B. Fractions below .50 shall be rounded down. NOTE: For parcels in the RA Zone, no rounding is allowed when calculating the allowable number of dwelling units. For example, if the calculation of the number of dwelling units equaled 2.75, the result would be 2 dwelling units. Rounding up to 3 is not allowed. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.070(E)). IV. Required On-site Recreation Space (K.C.C. 21A.14.180): This section must be completed only if the proposal is a residential development if more than four dwelling units in the UR and R zones, stand-alone townhouses in the NB zone on property designated Commercial Outside of Center if more than four units, or any mixed use development if more than four untts. Recreation space must be computed by Check out the ODES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Subdivision Density and Dimension calculations kxal-subden.pdf 12/10/03 Page 2 of6 [ __ • • multiplying the recreation space requirement per unit type by the proposed number of such dwelling units (K.C.C. 21A.14.180). Note: King County has the discretion to accept a fee in lieu of all or a portion of the required recreation space per K.C.C. 21A.14.185. Apartments and town houses developed at a density greater than eight units per acre, and mixed use must provide recreational space as follows: 90 square feet X proposed number of studio and one bedroom units 170 square feet X ---proposed number of two bedroom units + 170 square feet X ---proposed number of three or more bedroom units + ' ---Recreation space requirement Residential subdivisions, townhouses and apartments developed at a density of eight units or less per acre must provide recreational space as follows: 390 square feet X ----l.3.-proposed number of units = 5070 SF Mobile home parks shall provide recreational space as follows: 260 square feet X ___ proposed number of units = V. Net Buildable Area (K.C.C. 21A.06.797l: This section is used for computing minimum density and must be completed only if the site is located in the R-4 through R-48 zones and designated Urban by the King County Comprehensive Plan. The net buildable area is the site area (see Section I) less the following areas: :0: areas within a project site which are required to be dedicated for public rights-of-way in excess ofsixty (601 of width + I 0, LI:: 3:4 sensitive areas and their buffers, to the extent they are required by King County to remain undeveloped + 23;i.4:fi areas required for above ground stormwater control facilities induding, but not limited to, retention/detention ponds, biofiltration swales and setbacks from such ponds and swales + + + :::0:: areas required by King County to be dedlcated or reseNed as on-site recreation areas. Deduct area within stonnwater control facility if requesting recreation space aedit as allowed by K.C.C. 21A.14.180 (see Section IV) _:&:~--regional utility corridors, and _fr---other areas, excluding setbacks, required by King County to remain undeveloped :J,3 1~'32 Total reductions Calculation: fk,1,7S'f site area in square feet (see Section1) 3~1;02.Total reductions 12 e, 11)2,, Net buildable area in square feet NOTE: convert site area is square feet to • acres by dividing by 43,560 2.94 Net buildable area in acres = Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Subdivision Density and Dimension Calculations lc-cal-subden.pdf 12/10/03 Page 3 of6 r--- + + + + + + + • • VI. Minimum Urban Residential Density (K.C.C. 21A.12.0601: The minimum density requirement applies only to the R-4 through R-48 zones. Minimum density is determined by multiplying the base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section II) by the· net buildable area of the site in acres (see Section V) and then multiplying the resulting product by the minimum density percentage from the K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table. The minimum density requiremen_ts may be phased or waived by King County in certain cases. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.060.) Also, the minimum density requirement does not apply to properties zoned R-4 located within the rural town of Fall City. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.030(8)12.) Calculation: fl: base density in du/ac (see Sectlon II) X · 2 .'I~ Net buildable area In acres (see Sectlon V) .:: X minimum density% set forth in K.C.C. 21A.121f o or as adjusted in Section VII 11,1 h minimum dwelling units required VII. Minimum Density Adjustments for Moderate Slopes (K.C.C. 21A.12.0871: Residential developments in the R-4, R-6 and R-8 zones may modify the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 based on the weighted average slope of the net buildable area ofthe site (see Section V). To determine the weighted average slope, a topographic survey is required to calculate the net buildable area(s) within each of the following slope increments and then multiplying the number of square feet in each slope increment by the median slope value of each slope increment as follows: ____ sq. ft 0-5% slope Increment X 2.5% median slope value = ____ sq. ft 5-10% slope incrementX 7.5% median slope value= + ____ sq. ft 10-15% slope Increment X 12.5% median slope value= _____ + ____ sq. ft 15-20% slope incrementX 17.5% median slope value= + sq. ft 20-25% slope increment X 22.5% median slope value = + ----sq. ft 25-30% slope increment X 27.5% median slope value= + ____ sq. ft 30-35% slope Increment X 32.5% median slope value= + ____ sq. ft 35-40% slope Increment X 37.5% median slope value= + ____ Total square feet Total square feet in net bulldable area adjusted for slope Calculation: ____ total square feet adjusted for slope divided by total square feet in net buildable area ____ weighted average slope of net buildable area ____ % (Note: multiply by 100 to convert to percent-round up to nearest whole percent) Use the table below to determine the minimum density factor. This density is substituted for the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table when calculating the minimum density as shown in Section VI of this worksheet · Weighted Average Slope of Net Minimum Density Factor Buildable Area(s\ of Site: 0% -less than 5% 85% 5% --less than 15% 83%, less 1.5% each 1 % of averaoe slooe in excess of 5% 15% -less than 40% 66%, less 2.0% for each 1% of averaae slooe in excess of 15% Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Subdivision Density and Dimension Calculations lc-cal-subden.pdf 12/10/03 Page4of6 i I + + + + + + + • • EXAMPLE CALCULATION FOR MINIMUM DENSITY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MODERATE SLOPES: sq. ft 0-5% slope increment X 2.5% median slope value= 10,000 sq. ft 5-10% slope incrementX 7.5% median slope value= 750 + 20,000 sq. ft 10-15% slope incrementX 12.5% median slope value= 2 500 + sq. ft 15-20% slope incrementX 17.5% median slope value= + sq. ft 20-25% slope increment X 22.5% median slope value= + sq. ft 25-30% slope incrementX 27.5% median slope value= + sq. fl 30-35% slope increment X 32.5% median slope value= + sq. ft. 35-40% slope Increment X 37 .5 % median slope value = + 30,000 Total square feet 3250 Total square feet in net bulldable area adjusted for slope 3 250 Total square feet adjusted for slope divided by 30,000 Total square feet in net buildable area = .108333 Weighted average slope of net build able area 11 % (Note: multiply by 100 to convert to percent -round up to nearest whole percent) Using the table above, an 11 % weighted average slope of net buildable area falls within the 5% -less than 15% range which has a minimum density factor of 83%, less 1.5% for each 1 % of average slope in excess of 5%. Since 11 % is 6% above 5%, multiply 6 times 1.5 which would equal 9%. Subtract 9% from 83% for an adjusted minimum density factor of 74%. This replaces the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table. VIII. Maximum Dwelling Units Allowed (K.C.C. 21A.12.030 -.0401: This section should be completed only if the proposal includes application of residential density incentives (K.C.C. 21A.34) or transfer of density rights (K.C.C. 21A.37). Maximum density is calculated by adding the bonus or transfer untts authorized to the base units calculated in Section Ill of this worksheet. The maximum density permitted through residential density incentives is 150 percent of the base density (see Section II) of the underlying zoning of the development or 200 percent of the base density for proposals with 100 percent affordable units. The maximum density permitted through transfer of density rights is 150 percent of the base density (see Section II) of the underlying zoning of the development. ____ base density In dwelling units per acre see (Sedion II) X 150% = maximum density ____ maximum density in dwelling units per acre X site area in aaes = maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density incentives (K.C.C. 21A.34) ____ base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section II) X 200% = maximum density -~--maximum density in dwelling units per acre X site area in acres = maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density incentives with 100 percent affordable units (K.C.C. 21A.34) ____ base density In dwelling units per acre (see Sedion II) X 150% = maximum density -~--maximum density in dwelling units per acre X site area In acres = maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density transfers (K.C.C. 21A.37) Calculation: + + _____ base allowable dwelling units calculated In Section 111 _____ bonus units authorized by K.C.C. 21A.34 -----transfer units authorized by K.C.C. 21A.37 _____ total dwelling units (cannot exceed maximum calculated above) Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Subdivision Density and Dimension Calculations lc-ad-subden.pdf 12/1003 Page 5 of6 \ \ • • IX. Minimum Lot Area For Construction (K.C.C. 21A.12.1001: Except as provided for nonconformances in K.C.C. 21A.32: X. A. In the UR and R zones, no construction shall be permitted on a lot that contains an area of less than 2,500 square feet or that does not comply with the applicable minimum lot width, except for townhouse developments, zero- lot-line subdivisions, or lots created prior to February 2, 1995, in a recorded subdivision or short subdivision ~hich complied with applicable laws, and; B. In the A, F, or RA Zones: 1. Construction shall not be permitted on a lot containing less than 5,000 square feet; and 2. Construction shall be limited to one dwelling unit and residential accessory uses for lots containing greater than 5,000 square feet, but less than 12,500 square feet. (K.C.C. 21A.12.100) Lot Width (K.C.C. 21A.12.050(B)1: Lot widths shall be measured by scaling a circle of the applicable diameter within the boundaries of the lot as shown below, provided than an access easement shall not be included within the circle. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.050). 30Feel ·-·-·-·-·-·-' Lot Width Measurement Check out the ODES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Subdivision Density and Dimension Calculatlons lc-<:al-subden.pdf 12/10/03 Page 6 of6 •/ v \\\ I ., ' {. ' \ I I I i t \ ----. --~-. I I I /1DJ§©§D~§@ 1 \JU SE.P 2 S 2005 / ---·------··---·-1~/ ·. ,r;i~i)- -----l . I < s1.:'''.f"::'.~ . I . . I · .. '~\ilijfi ;-------------=-___ J_ . 0~ K.c. o.o.e.s. ·,· ~"\'~"c\---.1 J \)Q.Je,lqf"'".-J-,;.J ',_,-J,;,~~w \;(,, I ;7"' I l c.~ 1:-l. «; e..-'StruZc..e<:; ~;vi<,;oV\. °[,G0 Oo.ke~Jc,.,\e_ ~Q <;. v-J. ~~~\,\_ w A q B oc;s-r '1-l c, II r! J • 'J ' i,. . 'i' { . j • I ..... :~ ' 1 I , I ·• ' I ',:! ----------------· ---·---· . ·---~ Please send me notification of the public hearing and other official notices concerning this application. File No.: L05P0019 -Martin Subdivision ~:~:~eprint) &c y. f/fuN(ii Address: 9'3 3 3-$"1 /ly£ (;/B.ST Telephone No.: 4Z5-342. 03SJ7 Mur<.tl.,T&) . W/l. · r:rg 2.75.-, "'P~AR"'°l'Y=OFc1 R CORD King County has received an application to develop property at the addr_ess listed above. You are receiving this notice because our records indicate that you own property within approximately 500 feet of the proposal i,·_i ; ! ~ ( Id _ _Jo M ,, -r m () 0 -c -< \ ,r;-1,· ~------------------ / 0 ·! · .... ~. •~- WETLAND DETERMINATION FOR MARTIN PROPERTY Preliminary Plat King County, Washington Prepared for: Ms. Sara Slatten CamWest Development, Inc. 9720 NE 120th Pl. Suite #100 Kirkland, Washington 98034 425-825-1955 Prepared by: C. Gary Schulz Wetland/Forest Ecologist 7700 S. Lakeridge Dr. Seattle, Washington 98178 206-772-6514 ifjrn@rnowrno SEP 28 2005 ~ K.C. D.D.E.S. September 26, 2005 LOSP001'7 , ( I•., i .... • Introduction Project/ Site Description Purpose Methodology Wetland Determination Soils Hydrology Wetland Description Appendix A Data Plot Forms Appendix B Wetland Rating Forms List of Figures Vicinity Map (Figure 1) Preliminary Plat· Wetland Survey (Figure 2) • TABLE OF CONTENTS ... • • • INTRODUCTION Project Description A wetland investigation was conducted on the Martin Property located just west of 148th Avenue S.E. at 12439 148th Avenue S.E. in unincorporated King County (Section 10, Township 23 N., Range 5 E. W.M.). The Property is situated directly south of the Shamrock LID Subdivision project and is 3.71 acres in size (Figure I). The project is a proposed subdivision to include 13 new residential lots. Access would be provided by new roadways associated with the Shamrock LID. Storm water management includes a open detention pond facility (Tract E). The delineated wetland on the site would remain in a designated critical area tract (Tract B). Site Description The subject property is partially developed and includes a house, sheds, and outbuildings used for livestock. The Property is a rectangular parcel approximately 330 feet by 512 feet with a narrow panhandle for access from 148th Avenue. The majority of the site is characterized as old pasture area that lacks significant cover of native vegetation. The eastern area includes the buildings and mowed lawn. The western portion is unmaintained and includes some Himalayan blackberry clumps (Rubus discolor) and sparse cover of red alder (Alnus rubra) trees. Most of the pasture area is currently being grazed by livestock kept on the site. The predominant herbaceous plants are Kentucky fescue (Festucaarundinacea) and colonial bentgrass (Agrostis tenuis). Other common pasture species observed include false dandelion (Agoseris spp.), common velvetgrass(Holcus lanatus), and English plantain (Plantago/anceolata). The site topography is described as uniform and gently sloping to the west. Three shallow, manmade ditches cross the western half of the site from east to west. French drains and plastic piping were observed associated with the manmade ditching. A very small wetland has formed in a low area along the western property boundary. Purpose The purpose of this report is to provide the applicant a wetland determination study that identifies the extent of wetland area and related wetland management regulations currently administered by King County. Professional observations are included to assist with determining ratings and classifications. • .. • Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE MARTIN PROPERTY :S .... .... - Sc 120th ST ~ '!:! "' s ~ • PARK ,t RIDE: (Figure 1-Triad Associates) • • • Methodology Typically defined, wetlands are ... "those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas". Through the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and the Growth Management Act (GMA), the County reviews proposals which may potentially impact wetland and other sensitive areas. Because of observed site conditions, combined with jurisdictional wetland regulations, wetland presence and extent must be determined for the permitting process. · The methodology used for wetland determination was based on the presence of dominant hydrophytic vegetation (i.e. plant species adapted to, or tolerant of, growing in saturated soil conditions), hydric soils, and observed wetland hydrology as described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987). The Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Dept. of Ecology Pub. #96-94, 1997) was used, for consistent regional wetland determinations. The State manual was developed to address regional conditions and is consistent with the 1987 Corps Manual methodology. The three technical criteria for vegetation, soils, and hydrology are mandatory under normal conditions and must all be met for an area to be identified as wetland. As part of the Routine On-site Determination Method (Ecology Pub. #96-94,1997), data for wetland determination was collected on the property during the site investigation. The observed site conditions warranted installing data plots in lowland areas. Two wetland data plots were installed on the Martin Property. The wetland data plot forms are attached to this report. A map depicting the surveyed wetland area and proposed site plan is also included (Figure 2 -Martin Property, Triad Associates 2005). • • • WETLAND DETERMINATION The Martin Property was investigated on December 22, 2004. Based on the investigation of observed soils and vegetation cover, one small wetland area is present on the Property. Pink plastic flagging (#1 to #5) was used to delineate the area. The total size of the wetland is 1,223 square feet (0.03 acres). Direct wetland impacts are being avoided with this proposal. Soils The SCS (USDA 1973) Soil Survey -King County Area has mapped one soil series at the subject site. The soil map unit is Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes (AgB). The Alderwood series is comprised of moderately, well-drained soils associated with a glacial till at depths of 20 to 40 inches. These soils exist on uplands but have inclusions of other soils that are not large enough to map. Some included soils are Norma, Bellingham, Seattle, Tukwila, and Shalcar series. Investigation of portions of the site;s upland area confirmed soil that closely resembles the Alderwood series. The soil inclusions mentioned above are poorly drained and found in depression areas and drainage ways on till and outwash plains. These soil map units are listed in the Hydric Soils of Washington (1985). Hydric soils are generally associated with wetland habitats. Hydric mineral soil observed in soil pits excavated within the wetland area appears to be the Norma series. Hydrology Observed wetland hydrology is influenced by local, shallow groundwater. However, the central drainage channel that was manmade also directs water towards the wetland. If the wetland ponds water from rain storm events, the overflow is intercepted by a private catch basin that is located directly west of the wetland. ' • • • Wetland Description The wetland receives runoff from the drainage ditch located near the center of the Property. Saturated, hydric (wetland) soil was observed from shallow groundwater in the excavated soil for Data Plot 2 (Appendix A). The vegetative cover type in the wetland is emergent. Dominant plant species are colonial bentgrass and common velvetgrass with soft rush (Juncus ejfusus) and Kentucky fescue occurring as subdominant. Using the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USWS) classification system (Cowardin et al. 1979), this wetland is classified as palustrine, emergent, and seasonally flooded or saturated. The area has only one wetland class (emergent), has been degraded by grazing use, and may have been artificially created by controlled runoff. Using King County's new CAO wetland rating system (KCC 21A.24.318), the wetland would be rated as Category IV. Factors of small size, location relative to development, and disturbance greatly limit the opportunity and potential for the wetland to provide recognized functions. The wetland rating forms used to determine the rating are attached as Appendix B. In the Urban Growth Area, the standard buffer setback for Category IV wetlands is 50 feet. • • • REFERENCES Cowardin, L., V. Carter, F. Golet, and E: LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Office of Biological Services, Fish and Wildlife Service, United states Department of the Interior, FWS/OBS-79-31. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss. Hitchcock, C.L., A. Cronquist, M. Ownbey, and J.W. Thompson. 1977. Vascular Plants of the Pacific Northwest. University Press, Seattle, Washington. Hruby, T. 2004. Washington State wetland rating system for western Washington -Revised. Washington State Department of Ecology Publication# 04-06-025. King County. 1990. Sensitive Areas Map Folio. King County. 2005. King County Code -Chapter 21A.24 Critical Areas. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1973. King County Area Soil Survey, Washington. Prepared in cooperation with the Soil Conservation Service, King County, and the Washing~on Agricultural Experiment Station. United States Department of Interior, Fish, and Wildlife Service. 1988. National Wetland Inventory. Prepared for the Office of Biological Services. Washington State, Department of Ecology. 1997. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Ecology Publication #96-94. .. i i t I i l !! i! l! Iii j I a ; g ~ ,1 ~ st 6 I ;; t I :i J t I 1f :1 l;::- ~i .tE' t! -e · e MARTIN PROPER -... + + ..... ~ + + + + .,Ji-' l l ' ·,._.,......, "' ... // I ... :.. .,..._._. . i,., ............... ,·1 V --/' I , l! I, 46", ~ ' ' II ·~ ?. ,·. ,I l' --lll:ilff-,.._111,1 :' 1-.. I ----1-- / ' J·· ' t .......................... -<· { I \ \ , ......... 4 I.J \., j,w,g.. .... ~';I\'· ~ ~ ;I I '-.I I - \! :1 I . ·-,··J1 ' I ._, , ••• •1 I ·, .... \ ,·'>....... \ ·· .. •:;-~'cc~:~-~', ............ \,\ \\\ + + .,-._ ~ \ ... ... \ : ; \ ... ... \ ', \ \ + + ... ,, : \ .... :~-t.,..~\ '\ ··. ... ', \ I I I I I I I I I I I \ '-, i i \ I I I , ! \ ... , ... , \ ·-- ~ \ I I I • , I \ 1 1111111 '..,_ IJ 1'SI $OIT .,~.,-- 12 -son "~--' ·~ -~. · l,l'-I ::.." 11 , , ~. In !1: .; m~ ,,~ .... I .,..,,,. 0 0 tu.~ ----0--:... -:.-... ... ... -t,;--., -=------· '•, ------__ .. ______ ,, ·,, --·-··----······ r:::...~M' ,-I -... ___ , I -I I --, '1 /-·------· ~ r------, I I I ,--..,__ ' I I \,...,,,_.....~~ I ,-----, I ', 1 I ·,,.,....-• er : I r• 1 I 1 ' ,,. ·-, II \DCADIU1KI er ,,, ZONE 11 111 \ J 10 _J I J f I I J I 1, ~ ~ · J · 11 r--J R-4 1: r' I I r -, __ -----,_ I ', ---I L ___ J I I , _____ J I t_ __ J ; I I I I \ --L.. I I I ~1-------L------L -----L -1 _ ! I j ~-·-r--------, ----.---""'--1 i '1 ( I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I l . . 8 ~.~~· t n\ I R , ,,,1 , I ,_ • ~ , . ' ~ '-:!\Ii--f ~\ I ~-· t i V\ _____ L __ _ . ?.J ' 1, . .. --~, " I ,,, s tlV'O 5"T ' 'I Nn~ \ 10 mzson ',. ' \ \ _..., k:._ .. ....... .....-J r -----, l I rJ : I I I I I I I I L I I .J I '---"'---J I I I I I I I _J I I ---, --'----, / I . I I . j I i ~- .,r.::::m: .. I "i1---__.!.J i ,---I ,-' L,. ~ J I I c-"'"'" J --·------' -----------, I I I I I I __ J ,- L..__ •1 .......--rl L __ , ------- ~' lH----"'i--·--------- \! u r ,f------.,,----- ZONE R-4 r-J\ i ------- 1 i1l1,-1_j ___________ _ •: _j ft . I i-i --- 1 I I = I I I ~ i ,---, t-----' I r-'T""'-+--.....1 I I I I .,...,-., : I I I I L---1 r----, ,-I I I : ,-' I I I I I I L ____ , ,------, I I L I I -1 l I I I I I L ___ J ·~ I I I I r------------1 - I I I I I I J I 1-----1 -------- ' I I I I I I I I SITE DA TA: TOTAL SITE AREA: AREA WITHIN R-0-W.- PRIVATE ACCESS TRACT: TRACT "C": WETLAND ACCESS TRACT: TOTAL NEt SITE AREA: e 161,784 SF 18,513 SF 591 SF 1223 SF 141,457 SF ~.2~- I SCALE: 1 • • !iO' .. .. ..,. J I I C ZOOII 111AD ASSOC1A itilIAI)O CI AT BI All :---- ... ~ ~ ). Q:: ~ ~ ij f ti .. I ttt1111•tw..• _,.. __ -----_ .... ),.. ..... ~~ ~~ Q. a.: ~o ~l ... ;~ ~..,.;;; ~~ i ~m . ~ e <, I ; ),:' ... I (!I ~ ~ 111 -~ ,., .... ---Mfii!Mlliir'" Pl6lcf WlbPI .iiEi!J ---i!CR -· _, ,·qu..t-e.. a IWIPIIOt'WI ----•• -Ill, 04-257 1 1,.1 H • • · '{fet I • • VEG.ETATION Indicator . . Domlna9~Plant ::la-,f. . Dominant Ptant Speclas / oi 1. A.mil < .Jc.Jd .. ~v-a...-1. _. ----'----• -r };£1,b,,,s d/sc ahk ~} ·------- Status .Stratum . 4. • · · 14. ----,-------* 9()l s; 15,----- ...,.-.,, 6. 16. --"'--------- / 7 17. --~----- . 8. 18. ----'~---"--- B-2 9. 19. ----------'-'--1L . . · a . Pa. ~nt of dominant speclaa that are OBL, FACW, arid/r;r,FAC . ,/,9o P .. · Is the hydrophytlc: vegetation crtterion met? Y as ...k:::., No _ . . Rallonakl:---·-'---,----------'--------,---------- HYD.RO!,QGY . . · Is the ground auriace inundated? v,/__. _ No _V_ ~ Surface water depth: --------~ Is the aon saturated? Yes _v'No =-·-ff IJ Depth to.,ree-etandlng wat.er In pit/soil probe hole:-----~""'---------'------ List other field evidence of surface lnundatl.on or soil satu Ion. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? ·Yes. Ratlonala: ---.-------'---,----""----...,.----,--,------'----- . ·· · · .· . JURISDICTIONAL DETERMIN~N AND RATIONALE . . . ,lstheplantcommunltyawelland? Yes:_._ No~"' · ... · JiiL ~t?//s, · Rationale forjurlsdlctlonal decision: · • · --------;...,.-.---e;;.£.llLJ.~c.L.U..>!!.....__u..1-.~~'-#~"""':;..;i,....;:,....£.~=-;,-1,;w.~--lL;.... , 1 Thia data form can be used for the Hydrlc .Soll Assessment Procedure· · · Aasesanienf Procedure. . . 2 Classfflcatlon according to 'Soll Taxonomy.' . Fleld lnves11gator(a • ProjecVSlte: AppllcanOOwner: Note: H a more detailed stte • VEGETATION Indicator Indicator Dominant Plant !=°::P Status ~/ Dominant Plant Species ~ '9S'b ~-iqlur)C~:.u ~;tt~tM So/ flJCW~g· *~ ~ r:01"'=~ · :f============ / 6. L-~ :f1/r..-H 16. :::.-:.-:.-=.-=.-=.-=.-:..-:_-_-:_-:_-_-....;..--( ~:A-'"2 s2v,/! ;?/cl£ ,, · :~: -~----- Status Stratum B-2 9. (t_ · 19. --'---------'-'--- 10. · · · 2Q, . Percent of dominant apec:les that ani OBL, FACW, and/~C . ~· · · Is. the hydrophytlc vegetation crlterion met? Yea~ No ·-· __ ' . Rationale:·;..·--·---.------------------_;__ ______ _ HY~R~ Is the ground aurface lnundatedJ :Jes' __ Is the aoff saturated? Yes~ No_;__ No K._ Surface water depth: --------- " Depth lo free-standing water In pit/soil probe hole.: _ __:. _ __.r::.._ _____________ _ List other field evidence of'surface Inundation or soil saturation. No la the wetland hydroloQy criterion met? · Rationale:-'--------'--------'--------_;..---'------'------ . JURISDICTIONAL ~ERMINA TIO~ AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Yes ;JL No __ 'Rationale for'jurlsdlctlonaJ decision: -------------.--------------, \_ ,. . . ' .. 1 Thia. data form can be used for the Hydrlc .son Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community . · Asseaisrrient Procedure. . · · · · 2Classfflcstlon according lo "Soll Taxonomy.• • • • l APPENDIX B WETLAND RATING FORMS. • ' • • • WETLAND RATING FORM-WESTERN WASHINGTON Name of wetland (if known): h1ctk:±1h I f!._ro a~ Location: SEC: /0 TWNSHPJ3,VRNGE:S°£' (attach~ap with outline of wetland to rating form) Person(s) Rating Wetland: ______ Affiliatioll: -----Date of site visit: SUMMARY QF RATING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland · I_ II_ III_ IV_ Category I = Score >=70 Category II= Score 51-69 . Category III = Score 30-50 Category IV = ·score < 30 Score for Water Quality Functions Score for Hydrologic Functio~s Score for Habitat Functions TOTAL score for functions Category based on SPECIAL CHARAyfERISTICS of wetland I_ II_ Does not Apply X Final Category (choose the "highest" category from above) Check the appropriate type and class of wetland being rated. ::!;; . " ¥/"; • 1;1 .--.m· .. , ~!!li:~-~~t';J'!zy,i;, ~i 1.~' . ,. ·• ~littiif~ilif~IJ,J~li j)) :r,~ . , ,, .. \'<~ .. I :.!i,.,.. ~"· ,« '"'-,.. ' v-~-~ Estuarine Depressional I/ Natural Heritae:e Wetland Riverine Boe Lake-frinl!e Mature Forest Slope Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal Lagoon Freshwater Tidal Interdunal None of the above Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 1. August2004 ,' • • I Does the wetland being rated meet any of the criteria below?. If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland. SP 1. Has the wetland been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangeredplant or animal species (TIE species)? For the purposes ofthls rating system, "documented,,.means the wetland is on the a ro riate state or federal database. · SP2. Has the wetland been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or Endangered plant or animal species? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the a ro riate state database. SP3. Does the wetland contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WDFW for the state? ..• SP4. Does the wetland have a local significance in addition to its functions? For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having special significance. To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the Hydrogeomorphic Class of the wetland being rated. V v The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. Thls simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphlc Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. Seep. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 2 August2004 • • ,· • • • Classification o~ V_:~tated Wetlands for WljS_tern Washington Wetland Name: [Y\cl)("t 1/'f-.-rriJ""Y Date: _,_,1/b~.,-/o><--=5' ____ _ 1. ~e water levels in the wetland usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during floods)? 'f:;J-go to 2 YES -the wetland class is Tidal Fringe If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt(parts per thousand)? YES -Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO-Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine} If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wetland. Wetlands that .were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this revision .. Tb maintain consistency between editions, the term "Estuarine" wetland is kept. Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Category I and II estuarine wetlands have changed (seep. ). 2. I~topography within the wetland flat and precipitation is only source (>90%) of water to it. t~-go to 3 . YES -The wetland class is Flats · If your wetland can be classified as a "Flats" wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the wetland meet both of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of open water (without any vegetation on the surface) where at least 20 acres (8 ha) are permanently inundated (ponded or flooded); At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m)? o t~ 4 YES -The wetland class is L~ke-fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. e wetland meet all of the following criteria? . __ The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), __ The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct .banks. __ The water leaves the wetland without being impounded? · NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks( depressions are usually ,/(:] <3ji diameter and less than 1 foot deep). (7 -go to 5 YES -The wetland class is Slope 5. Is the wetland in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river? The flooding should occur at least once every two years, on the average, to answer "yes. " The wetland can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is n~ooding. ~ go to 6 YES -The wetland class is Riverine Wetland Rating Fonn-western Washington 3 August2004 • • 6. Is the wetland in a·topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at ' some time of the year. This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. ~ NO -go to 7 · ES The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the wetland locate · a very flat area with no obvious depression and no stream or river running through it and providing water. The wetland seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the ~he wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO -go to 8 V The wetland class is Depressional · 8. Your wetland seems to be difficult to classify. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into .a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. Sometimes we find characteristics of several different hydrogeomorphic classes within one wetland boundary. Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HOM classes present within your wetland .. NOTE: us·e this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents I 0% or more of the total area of the wetland being rated. If the area of the second class is less than I 0% classify the wetland using the first class. Slone + Denressional Depressional Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary Denressional + Lake-frin{!e Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland Depressicinal Denressional Treat as ESTUARINE under wetlands with special characteristics If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or you have more than 2 HOM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. · · Wetland Rating F onn -western Washington 4 August2004 • ' • • ' • • WATERQUALITYFUNCTIONS -Indicators that wetland functions to illlprove. water quhlity · · · · D D 1. Does the wetland have the potential to improve water qnality? (seep. 38) D D D D D D D D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: Wetland is a depression with no surface water outlet Wetland has an intermittently flowing, or highly constricted, outlet Wetland has an unconstricted surface outlet Wetland is flat and has no obvious outlet and/or outlet is a ditch points= 3 · points= 2 points= 1 oints = 1 D 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface is clay, organic, or smells anoxic (hydrogen sulfide or rotten eggs). D 1.3 teristics of persistent vegetation (emergent, shrub, and/or forest class): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation > = 9 5% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation > = 1/2 of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation>= 1/10 of area points= 1 Wetland has ersistent, un razed ve elation <l/10 of area oints = 0 · D 1.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation . . This is the area of the wetland that is ponded for at least 2 months, but dries out sometime during the year. Do not count the area that is permanently ponded. Estimate area as the average condition 5 out of 10 yrs. Area seasonally ponded is > Yz total area of wetland points = 4 Area seasonally ponded is > Y. total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < Y. total area of wetland· points = 0 NOTE: See text or indicators o seasonal and ermanent inundation .. Total for Dl Add the points in the boxes above D 2. Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (seep. 44) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland? Note which of the foll~ conditions provide the sources of pollutants. · -Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft · -Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland -..tined fields or orchards within 150 ft of wetland ..IL' A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas, residential areas, farmed fields, roads, or clear-cut logging · -Residential, urban areas, golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland -Wetland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen Other---------------- ES multi lier is 2 NO multi lier is 1 TOTAL -Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from Dl by D2 Add score to table on . I Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 5 August2004 I 0 0 multiplier. ;L_ D D D D • • HYI>ROLOGIC FlJNCTI0NS ~ I11dicafors that wetland fuiictions to reduce floodi11 and stre~ril de . adatitih ; ' . . . . . . . . . . D 3. Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? see . 46 D 3.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland Wetland has no surface water outlet points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing, or highly constricted, outlet points= 2 Wetland is flat and has no.obvious outlet and/or outlet is a small ditch points= I Wetland has an unconstricted surface outlet oints = 0 D 3 .2 Depth of storage during wet periods Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface points = 7 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland" points = 5 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface points= 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water Marks of ondin less than 0.5 ft D 3 .3 Contribution of wetland to storage in the watershed Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland itself · The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of wetland points = 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the wetland points= 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the wetland points = 0 Wetland is in the FLATS class asin = the wetland, b definition oints = 5 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above D D 4. Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? D (seep. 49) Answer YES if the wetland is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage, or redµction in water velocity, it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or.excessive and/or erosive flows. Answer NO if the water coming into the wetland is controlled by a structure such as flood gate, tide gate, flap valve, reservoir etc. OR you estimate that more than 90°~0 of e water in the wetland is from groundwater. . Note zch of the following indicators of opportunity apply. Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems -Wetland drains to a river or streamthat has flooding problems . -Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might otherwise flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems · ther.~---------------- multi lier is.2 NO multi lier is 1 TOT AL -·Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4 Add score to table on p. 1 Wetland Rating Fann -western Washington .6 · August 2004 , 0 0 0 0 multiplier () I • R R R R R R • • WATER Q{JALITY FlJNCTIONS • -~ Inilicators thafwetland functions to imprbve water quality . .. . •. . . . . . R 1. Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (seep. 52) R 1.1 Area of surface depressions within the riverine wetland that can trap sediments during a flooding event: Depressions cover >3/4 area of wetland Depressions cover > 1/2 area of wetland Depressions present but cover < 1/2 area of wetland No de ressions resent R 1.2 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland: points= 8 points= 4 points= 2 oints = 0 Forest or shrub > 2/3 the area of the wetland points = 8 Forest or shrub > 1/3 area of the wetland points = 6 Ungrazed, emergent plants> 2/3 area of wetland points= 6 Ungrazed emergent plants> 1/3 area of wetland points= 3 Forest, shrub, and un razed emer ent < 1/3 area of wetland oints = 0 Add the points in the boxes above R 2. Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (seep. 53) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water comi_ng into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland? Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. -Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft -Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland -Tilled fields or orchards within 150 feet of wetland -A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas, residential areas, farmed fields, roads, or clear-cut logging -Residential, urban areas, golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland -The river or stream linked to the wetland has a contributing basin where human activities have raised levels of sediment, toxic compounds or nutrients in the river water above standards for water quality -Other _______________ _ YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 TOTAL -Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from R 1 by R 2 Add score to table on . 1 Comments Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 7 . August 2004 multiplier R R R • • HYDROLOGIC FUN'CJ]ONS " lildicator:S tliatwedarid·functions'to reauce . ·. floodin and. stream. i:rosion ' R 3. Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? see . 54 R 3.1 Characteristics of the overbank storage the wetland provides: Estimate the average width of the wetland perpendicular to the direction of the flow and the width of the stream or river channel (distance between banks). Calculate the ratio: ( width of wetland)/( width of stream). If the ratio is more than 20 points= 9 If the ratio is between 10-20 points= 6 lfthe ratio is 5-<10 points= 4 If the ratio is 1-<5 points = 2 If the ratio is < 1 oints = 1 . R 3.2 Characteristics of vegetation that slow down water velocities during floods: Treat large woody debris as "forest or shrub ". Choose the points appropriate for the best description. Forest or shrub for> 1/3 area OR Emergent plants > 2/3 area Forest or shrub for> 1/10 area OR Emergent plants> 1/3 area Ve elation does not meet above criteria points= 7 points= 4 oints = 0 Add the points in the boxes above R .R 4. Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? R (seep. 57) Answer YES if the wetland is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage, or reduction in water velocity, it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Note which of the following conditions apply. -There are human structures and activities downstream (roads, buildings, bridges, farms) that can be damaged by flooding. -. There are natural resources downstream ( e.g. salmon redds) that can be damaged by flooding -Other ______ ~---------- (Answer NO if the major source of water to the wetland is controlled by a reservoir or the wetland is tidal fringe along the sides of a dike) · YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 Comments TOT AL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from R 3 by R 4 Add score to table.on p. I Wetland Rating Form -western Washington . 8 · August 2004 • I multiplier • • • • WA'I1E~ QUALITY FUNCTIONS -J.n:dfoators thatwetlan<I functions to iniproye wiiter quality . . .. . . . L L 1. Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (seep. 59) L L L L L L 1.1 Average width of vegetation along the lakeshore: Vegetation is more than 33ft (!Om) wide Vegetation is more than 16 (Sm) wide and <33ft Vegetation is more than 6ft (2m) wide and <16 ft Ve etation is Jess than 6 ft wide · points= 6 points= 3 points= 1 oints = 0 L 1.2 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland: choose the appropriate description that results in the highest points, \and do not include any open water in your estimate of coverage. In this case the herbaceous plants can be either the dominant form (called emergent class) or as an understory in a shrub or forest community. Herbaceous plants cover >90% of the vegetated area Herbaceous plants cover >2/3 of the vegetated area Herbaceous plants cover> 1/3 of the vegetated area Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed in> 2/3 vegetated area Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed in > 1/3 vegetated area A uatic bed cover> 2/3 of the ve elated area points= 6 points= 4 points= 3 points= 3 points= I oints = 0 Add the points in the boxes above L 2. Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (seep. 61) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in the lake water, or surface water flowing through the wetland to the lake is polluted. Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. -Wetland is along the shores of a lake or reservoir that does not meet water quality standards -Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft -Polluted water discharges to wetland along upland edge -Tilled fields or orchards within 150 feet of wetland -Residential or urban areas are within 150 ft of wetland -Parks with grassy areas that are maintained, ballfields, golf courses (all within 150 ft. oflake shore) -Power boats with gasoline or diesel engines use the lake -Other _______________ _ YES multi lier is 2 NO · multi lier is 1 TOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from LI by 12 Add score to table on . 1 Comments Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 9 August2004 / multiplier L L L L L • • HYDR010GIC'FlJNCTIONS •. Iriclicafors that wetland functioristo reduce · shor~line erosion . . . . . . L 3. Does the wetland have the potential to reduce shoreline erosion? (seep. 62) L 3 Average width and characteristics of vegetation along the lakeshore ( do not include aquatic bed): (choose the · highest scoring description that matches conditions in the wetland) >%of fringe vegetation is shrubs or trees at least 33 ft (!Om) wide >%of fringe vegetation is shrubs or trees at least 6 ft. (2 m) wide > \I., of fringe vegetation is shrubs or trees at least 33 ft (10m) wide. Fringe vegetation is at least 6 ft (2m) wide Frin e ve etation is less than 6 ft 2m wide points= 6 points= 4 points= 4 points= 2 oints = 0 Record the points from the box above L 4. Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce erosion? (seep. 63) Are there features along the shore that will be impacted if the shoreline erodes? Note which of the following conditit;ms apply. -There are human structures and activities along the upland edge of the wetland (buildings, fields) that can be damaged by erosion. -There are undisturbed natural resources along the upland edge of the wetland ( e.g. mature forests other wetlands) than can be damaged by shoreline erosion -Other ________________ _ YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 Comments TOTAL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from L 3 by L 4 Add score to table on p. I Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 10 August2004 • • multiplier • s s s s s s s • • WATERQUALITYFUNCTIONS. -lhdic11tpr$,thafwetfand functioii.S,fu . illlprove water, qu~lify •.. . . . . . . . ·. . . . . . . ·.·· . '. S 1. Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (seep. 64) S LI Characteristics of average slope of wetland: Slope isl% or less (a 1% slope has a 1 foot vertical drop in elevation/or every 100 ft horizontal distance) . .. .. .. . .. . .. .. . .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. points = 3 Slope is I% -2% poib.ts = 2 Slope is 2% -5% . points = l Slope is greater than 5% points = 0 S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface is clay, organic, or smells anoxic (hydrogen sulfide or rotten eggs). YES = 3 oints NO = 0 oints S 1.3 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the vegetation in the wetland. Dense vegetation means you have trouble seeing the soil surface. Dense, ungrazed, herbaceous vegetation > 90% of the wetland area points = 6 Dense, ungrazed, herbaceous vegetation > 1/2 of area points = 3 Dense, woody, vegetation> Y, of area points = 2 Dense, ungrazed, herbaceous vegetation> 1/4 of area points = 1. Does not meet an of the criteria above for ve elation oints = 0 Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes above S 2. Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve Wllter quality? (seep. 67) Ariswer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland? Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. -Grazing in the wetland or within. 150ft . -Untreated storm water discharges to wetland -Tilled fields, logging, or orchards within 15.0 feet of wetland -Residential, urban areas, or golf courses are within 150 ft upslope of wetland -Other~--------------- YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 TOTAL -Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from SI by S2 Add score to table on . 1 Comments Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 11 August2004 multiplier s s s s s • • . HYD~QL()QIC FlJNGTIQNS, • ·rugic~to,rs tpat w_et)l\11,d ftmc:tiqris t<J reguce . floodil) aaiid sti:eiim erosion . < _.· > :-: ,, , : .· _·· • . • : .. , ' S 3. Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion? see • 68 S 3. I Characteristics of vegetation that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms. Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fit · conditions in the wetland. Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation covers > 90% of the area of the wetland. _ (stems of plants should be thick enough (usually> I/Sin), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows) points = 6 Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation> 1/2 area of wetland points= 3 Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation> 1/4 area points = I More than 1/4 of area is grazed, mowed, tilled or vegetation is not ri id oints = 0 S 3 .2 Characteristics of slope wetland that holds back small amounts ·of flood flows: The slope wetland has small surface depressions that can retain water over at least I 0% of its area. YES points = 2 · NO oints = 0 Add the points in the boxes above S 4. Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? (seep. 70) Is the wetland in a landscape position where the reduction in water velocity it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources froin flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows? Note which of the following conditions apply. -Wetland has surface runoff that drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems -_Other·--------~------- (Answer NO if the major source of water is controlled by a·reservoir (e.g. wetland is a seep that is on_ the downstream side of a darn) YES multi lier is 2 NO multi lier is 1 Comments TOTAL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from S 3 by S 4 · Add score to table on p. 1 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 12 · August 2004 • • multiplier • • • • HABITAT FUNCTlONS C Indicators that wetland.functions to provide important habitat H 1. Does the wetland have the potential to provide habitat for many species? H I. I Vegetation structure (seep. 72) · Check the types of vegetation classes present (as defined by Cowardin) if the class covers more than JO% of the area of the wetland or~ acre . . · £quatic bed . . V __ E F.nmergent plants . . __ Scrub/shrub (areas where shrubs have >30% cover) __ Forested (areas where trees have >30% cover) __ Forested areas have 3 out of5 strata (canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) Add the number of vegetation types that qualify. If you have: H 1.2. Hydroperiods (seep. 73) 4 types or more 3 types 2 types I t e Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland·or ~ acre to count. (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods) __ Permanently flooded or inundated ~ onally flooded or inundated __ ccasionally flooded or inundated __ . Saturated only . 4 or more types present 3 types present 2·types present __ Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland __ Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland __ Lake-fringe wetland = 2 points __ Freshwater tidal wetland= 2 points points= 3 points= 2 point= I H 1.3. Richness of Plant Species (seep,. 75) · · Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft 2• patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold) .You do not have to name the species. (different Do not include Eurasian Milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple looses/rife, Thistle · · List species below if you want to: AJ:osts ~ul..s '#;~OJ.£ !~+~5 V1J.n...c_u_5 e .. :rN'-'-s Wetland Rating Form -western Washington If you counted: 13 > 19 species 5 -19 species . < 5 species Canadian points= 2 points= 1 points= 0 August 2004 0 I 0 • • H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats (seep. 76) Decide from the diagrams .below whether interspersion between types of vegetation (described in H 1.1), or vegetation.types and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high,.medium, low, or none. 0 None= 0 points/Low= 1 ~oint ·'. 0 Moderate = 2 points [ riparian braided channels] High = 3 points NOTE: If you have four or more vegetation types or three vegetation types and o en water the ratin is alwa s "hi h". H 1.5. Special Habitat Features: (seep. 77) Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points you put into the next column. _· _Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (>4in. diameter and 6 ft long). __ Standing snags (diameter at the bottom> 4 inches) in the wetlan_d __ Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft (Im) over a stream for at least 33 ft (!Om) __ Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30degree slope) OR signs ofrecent beaver activity are present __ At least Y.. acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg-laying by /amphibians) . _V ___ T J,nvasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in each stratum of plants Comments Wetland Rating F onn -western Washington H 1. TOT AL Score -potential for providing habitat Add the scores in the column above 14 August2004 .. : • 0 I • . . • • • • H 2, Does the wetland have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species? H 2 .I Buffers (seep. 80) Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See text for definition of "undisturbed. " -100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% of circumference. No developed areas withln undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no-grazing) Points= 5 -100 m (330 ft) ofrelatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 50% circumference. Points = 4 -50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% circumference. Points = 4 -100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 25% circumference, . Points = 3 -50 m (I 70ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for > 50% circumference. Points = 3 ~ If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft) of wetland> . / 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 21" -No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >50% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 -Heavy grazing in buffer. Points = 1 -Vegetated buffers are <2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference ( e.g. tilled fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points= 0. -Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points= 1 H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (seep. 81) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed arid unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs, forest' or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in ripa.rian corridors, heavily used gravefroads, paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor). . ~ · YES= 4 points (go to H 2.3) NO go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undistu ed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 50ft wide, has at least 30% cover of .shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake-fringe wetland, if it does not have .an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? £J YES= 2 points (go to H 2.3) & H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 Is the wetland: within 5 mi (8km) of a brackish or salt water estuary OR withln 3 mi of a large field or pasture (>40 acres) OR within I mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? YES= 1 point Wetland Rating F onn -western Washington 15 CN'd = 0 points August2004 0 • • H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW (seep. 82) Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft (100m) of the wetland? (see text for a more detailed description of these priority habitats) __ Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. __ Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.8 ha (2 acres). __ Cliffs: Greater than 7 .6 m (25 ft) high and occurring below 5000 ft. __ Old-growth forests: (Old-growth west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 20 trees/ha (8 trees/acre)> 81 cm (32 in) dbh or> 200 years of age. __ Mature forests: Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm (21 in) dbh; crowri cover may be less th.at 100%; crown cover may be less that I 00%; decay, de.cadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth; 80 -200 years old west of the Cascade crest. __ Prairies: Relatively undisturbed areas (as indicated by dominance of native plants) where grasses and/or forbs form the natural climax plant community. __ Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 -2.0 m (0.5 - 6.5 ft), composed of basalt; andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. __ Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages ~ egon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations here canopy coverage of the oak component of the stand is 25%. Urban Natural Open Space: A priority species resides within or is adjacent to the open space and uses it for breeding and/or regular feeding; and/or the open space functions as a corridor connecting other priority habitats, especially those that would otherwise be isolated; and/or the open space is an isolated remnant of natural habitat larger than 4 ha (l O acres) and is surrounded by urban development. __ Estuary/Estuary-like: Deepwater tidal habitats and adjacent tidal wetlands, usually · semi-enclosed by land but with open, partly obstructed or sporadic access to the open ocean, and in which ocean water is at least occasionally diluted by freshwater runoff from the land. The salinity may be periodically increased above that of the open ocean by evaporation. Along some low-energy coastlines there is appreciable dilution of sea water. Estuarine habitat extends upstream and landward to where ocean-derived sa.lts measure less than 0.5ppt. during the period of average annual low flow. Includes both estuaries and lagoons. __ Marine/Estuarine Shoreiines: Shorelines include the intertidal and subtidal zones of beaches, and may also include the backshore and adjacent components of the · terrestrial landscape (e.g., cliffs, snags; mature trees, dunes, meadows) that are important to shoreline associated fish and wildlife and that contribute to shoreline function (e.g., sand/rock/log recruitment, nutrient contribution, erosion control). If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats = 4 points If wetland has 2 priority habitats = 3 points ./ ff wetland has 1 prioritv habitat= 1 noint V No habitats= 0 noints ' Wetland Rating F onn -western Washington 16 August 2004 ' : ;; J •, • . • -------·-----··-~------------ • • H 2.4 Wetland Landscape {choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland that best.fits) (seep. 84) There are at least 3 other wetlands within Y, mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields, or other development. . points= 5 . The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake- fringe wetlands within Yz mile points=: 5 There are at least3 other wetlands within Yz mile, BUT the connections between th~~ are disturbed points = 3 · The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake- fringe wetland within Y, mile points= 3 There is at least 1 wetland within Yz mile. points= 2 There are no wetlands within Yz mile. points= 0 H 2. TOT AL Score -opportunity for providing habitat · Add the scores in the column above Total Score for Habitat Functions -add the points for H 1, H 2 and record the result on p, 1 Wetland Rating F onn -western Washington 17 August 2004 3 0 ~ • • CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described. below and circle the appropriate answers and Category. Wetl!tJJII '.l;'yp,e . · .. ·. · .... ; •. >. . . · · · .... G~~i:k o/f a'!y rr:i,teria that applY, to the ~et/and, .. Circle the appfopria,t~ Sat~~gj! ·. whi!n the.dritJropridte criteria dr,e meii'': . '. ''. .. . . . .. . -· . ', .. . . . ~· _. '· SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands (seep. 86) Does the wetland meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? -The dominant water regime is tidal, -Vegetated, and -With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. YES= Go to SC I.I NO_ SC I. I Is the ·wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated und.er WAC 332-30-151? YES = Categorv I NO go to SC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland at least I acre in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? YES = Category I NO= Category II -· The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching; filling, cultivation, grazing, and has less than I 0% cover of non-native plant species. If the non-native Spartina spp. are the only species that cover more than I 0% of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual rating (I/II). The area of Spartina would be rated a Category II while the relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a Category I. Do not, however, exclude the area of Spartina in· determining the size threshold of I acre. -At least% of the landward edge of the wetland has a I 00 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. -The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. Wetland Rating F onn -western Washington 18 · August 2004 Cat. I Cat. I Cat. II Dual rating 1/11 ,, ; • . ' • ' • . • • SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands (seep. 87) Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive.plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland being rated in a Section/Township/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? (this question is used to screen out most sites before you need to contact WNHPIDNR) S/T/R infonnation from Appendix D _ or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site _ YES __ -contact WNHP/DNR (seep. 79) and go to SC 3.2 NO_ SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? YES = Category I NO __ SC 3.0 Bogs (seep. 87) Does the wetland ( or part of the wetland) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify if the wetland is a bog. If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. 1. Does the wetland have organic soil horizons (i.e. layers of organic soil), either peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils)? Yes -go to Q. 3 No -go to Q. 2 2. Does the wetland have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on a lake or pond? Yes -go to Q. 3 No -Is not a bog for purpose of rating 3. Does the wetland have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND other plants, if present, consist of the "bog" species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation (more than 30% of the total shrub and herbace.ous cover consists of species in Table 3)? Yes -Is a bog for purpose. ofrating No -go to Q. 4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about 'the extent of mosses in the understory you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16"aeep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the "bog" plant species in Table 3 are present, the wetland is a bog. 3. Is the wetland forested(> 30% cover) with sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Englemann's spruce, or western white pine, WITH any of the species (or combination of species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover(> 30% coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover)? 4. YES = Category I No_ Is not a bog for purpose of rating Wetland Rating Fonn-western Washington 19 August2004 Cat. I Cat. I • • .. ,,. ;:. _, ·• " :-~, ... SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands (seep. 90) Does the wetland have at least I acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based, on its functions. -Old-growth forests: (west of Cascade crest) Stands ofat least two tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/acre (20 trees/hectare) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of32 inches (81 cm) or more. NOTE": The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests. Two-hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and "OR" so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. -Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are 80-200 years old OR have average diameters (dbh) exceeding 21 inches (53cm); crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth. YES = Category I NO_ SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (seep. 91) Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? -The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks -The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish(> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured near the bottom) YES= Go.to SC 5.1 NO_not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5 .I Does the wetland meets all of the following three conditions? -The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of invasive plant species (see list of invasive species on p. 74). -At least :V. of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. -The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre (4350 square feet) YES = Category I NO= Category II Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 20 · August 2004 Cat. I· Cat. I Cat. II • . j • " • • SC 6.0 Interdunal Wetlands (seep. 93) Is the wetland west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? YES -go to SC 6.1 NO_ not an interdunal wetland for rating If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: • Long Beach Peninsula-lands west of SR I 03 • Grayland-Westport-lands west of SR 105 • Ocean Shores-Copalis-lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is once acre or larger? YES = Category II NO -go to SC 6.2 Cat. II SC 6.2 Is the wetland between 0.1 and 1 acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and I acre? YES = Category III Cat. III Wetland Rating Form·_ western Washington 21 August 2004 • ' I • ' .. I I I I I · I I . I I I I I l- e: L • • SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION, GEOLOGIC HAZARD, AND PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT \ MARTIN PROPERTY King County, Washington Prepared for: CamWest Development, Inc. 9720 NE 120th Place, Suite 100 Kirkland, Washington 98034 Prepared by: Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. 911 5th Avenue, Suite 100 Kirkland, Washington 98033 425-827-7701 Fax: 425-827-5424 January 27, 2005 Project No. KE04710A K.C. D.D.E.S. Lo-sP0019 MAIN FILE COPY @ I I 1· I I C • Martin Property King County, Washington • Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Pro;ec/ and Site Conditions I. PROJECT AND SITE CONDITIONS 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our subsurface exploration, geologic hazard, and preliminary geotechnical engineering study for the proposed new residential development. Our recommendations are preliminary in that project plans are still under development at the time of our exploration and preparation of this report. The project site location is shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. The existing site features, topography, and approximate locations of the explorations accomplished for this study are presented on the Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 2. The locations of the proposed improvements were not available at the time this report was completed. Therefore, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report should be reviewed and modified, or verified, as necessary once project plans and details are developed. 1.1 Purpose and Scope The purpose of this study was to provide subsurface data to be used in the preliminary design of the project. Our study included a review of selected geologic literature, excavating exploration pits, and performing geologic studies to assess the type, thickness, distribution, and physical properties of the subsurface sediments and shallow ground water conditions. Preliminary geotechnical engineering studies were completed to formulate our recommendations for site preparation, site grading, house construction, drainage, and paving. This report summarizes our current fieldwork and offers development recommendations based on our present understanding of the project. We recommend that we be allowed to review project plans prior to construction to verify that our geotechnical engineering recommendations have been correctly interpreted and incorporated into the design. Additional exploration or design modifications/review may be required to finalize project documentation. 1.2 Authorization Written authorization to proceed with this study was granted by Ms. Sara Slatten of Cam West Development, Inc. (CamWest) by means of a signed copy of our scope of work and cost proposal dated November 9, 2004. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of CamWest and their agents for specific application to this project. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering and engineering geology practices in effect in this area at the time our report was prepared. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGB/sn -KE047JOA2-Proj~cts\2004710\KE\WP Page 1 ~--------------------------------------------------- • Martin Property King County, Washington 2.0 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION • Subsu,jace Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Project and Site Conditions 1 · This report was completed with an understanding of the project based on a preliminary plot I plan with proposed exploration locations provided to us by CamWest. The plan does not show lot layouts or road locations. Site grading plans were also not available when this report was prepared. The plot plan was used as a basis for Figure 2 of this report. I I r- 1 i-: = I The project site includes one rectangular-shaped parcel currently developed as a rural residential property. The parcel is roughly 3.69 acres in overall area. A house and barn occupy the eastern portion of the parcel. The north, west, and south property lines border existing CamWest developments currently under construction. The eastern property line borders other rural residential properties. The majority of the property is covered with pasture used for goat, sheep, and horse grazing. Deciduous trees are scattered throughout the property. A small ephemeral wetland exists near the west property line. Overall vertical relief across the site is approximately 24 feet. The property slopes gently to the southwest. The proposed project is anticipated to include construction of residential building lots, access roads, buried utilities, and other typical improvements. The planning for this project was in the conceptual phase at the time this report was written and details such as cut and fill areas and amounts, lot and street layouts, detention facility locations, etc. were not known. However, we assume that storm water detention facilities will be constructed in the southwest site corner or storm water will be conveyed to the adjacent Cam West development storm water facilities. 3.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Our field study included the planned excavation of nine exploration pits to gain subsurface information about the site. The exploration locations were staked in the field by CamWest during our subsurface exploration. The various types of sediments, as well as the depths where characteristics of the sediments changed, are indicated on the exploration logs presented in the Appendix. The depths indicated on the logs where conditions changed may represent gradational variations between sediment types in the field. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the nine exploration pits completed for this study. The number, locations, and depths of the explorations were completed within site and budgetary constraints. Because of the nature of exploratory work below ground, extrapolation of subsurface conditions between field explorations is necessary. It should be noted that differing subsurface conditions may sometimes be present due to the random nature of deposition and the alteration of topography January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARm SCIENCES, INC. SGB!sn -KE04710A2 -Projectsl20047JO\KE\WP Page 2 I I I r r· l I I·, c:: • Martin Property King County, Washington • Subsuiface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Project and Site Condi1ions by past grading and/or filling. The nature and extent of any variations between the field explorations may not become fully evident until construction. If variations are observed at that time, it may be necessary to re-evaluate specific recommendations in this report and make appropriate changes. 3 .1 Exploration Pits The exploration pits were excavated using a rubber-tired backhoe. The pits permitted direct, visual observation of subsurface conditions. Materials encountered in the exploration pits were studied and classified in the field by a geotechnical engineer from our firm. All exploration pits were backfilled immediately after examination and logging. Selected samples were then transported to our laboratory for further visual classification and testing, as necessary. 4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions at the project site were inferred from the field explorations accomplished for this study, visual reconnaissance of the site, and review of selected geologic literature. The general distribution of geologic units is shown on the field logs .in the Appendix to this report. . The explorations generally encountered a relatively thick sequence of topsoil and organic weathered soils over medium dense grading to very dense silty sand with gravel and cobbles interpreted as lodgement till. The on-site sediments are mapped as Vashon till deposits on the Geologic Map of King County, Washington by Booth et al., 2002. 4.1 Stratigraphy Grass/Topsoil A surficial layer of grass and organic topsoil was encountered at the location of each of the exploration pits. This organic layer ranged from approximately 10 to 31 inches in thickness. Due to their high organic content, these materials are not considered suitable for foundation, roadway, or slab-on-grade floor support, or for use in a structural fill. Below the organic topsoil, we encountered loose to medium dense, brown to dark brown weathered soils derived from the underlying lodgement till. This material varied across the site in thickness, density, and organic/root/wood content. It is not considered suitable for foundation support, but may be used at the discretion of the Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESD field representative for support of pavement and structural fill in areas where it contains only minor amounts of organics, and can be compacted to project specifications described in the Preliminary Design Recommendations section of this report. Because of its relatively high organic content, it should not be used as structural fill. January 27. 2/XJ5 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGB!sn -KE04710A2-Projecls\2004710\KE\WP Page 3 • I I I i C Manin Property King County, Washington Vashon Lodgement Till • • Subswface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Repon Project and Site Conditions All of our exploration pits encountered medium dense grading to very dense, silty sand with gravel, cobbles, and occasional boulders interpreted as lodgement till. The lodgement till observed in our explorations graded from mottled gray and brown near the surface to gray and weakly to moderately cemented at depth. Lodgement till was deposited at the base of an active continental glacier and was subsequently compacted by the weight of the overlying glacial ice. Lodgement till typically possesses high strength and low compressibility attributes that are favorable for support of foundations, floor slabs, and paving with proper preparation. Lodgement till is silty and moisture-sensitive. In the presence of moisture contents above the optimum moisture content for compaction purposes, lodgement till can be easily disturbed by vehicles and earthwork equipment. Careful management of moisture-sensitive soils, as recommended in this report, will be needed to reduce the potential for disturbance of wet lodgement till soils and costs associated with repairing disturbed soils. 4.2 Hydrology Ground water was encountered in several exploration pits at or near the contact with the weathered soil and lodgement till. Our exploration pits provide a reasonable assessment of ground water conditions that may be encountered during normal construction activities during the middle or beginning of the "wet" season. We expect that increased seepage could occur throughout the site during normal construction activities that begin towards the end of the "wet" season in April. This seepage is representative of interflow. Interflow commonly occurs in areas underlain by lodgement till and originates as surface water that percolates down through the near-surface, relatively permeable weathered soils and becomes trapped or "perched" atop the underlying, relatively impermeable, unweathered lodgement till sediments. Interflow is often a seasonal phenomenon. It should be noted that the presence and depth of seepage at the site may vary in response to such factors as changes in season, precipitation, and site use. 4.3 Laboratory Test Results Laboratory testing on selected soil samples from explorations was completed in accordance with report requirements typically requested by Cam West. Laboratory testing results are also included in the Appendix. Moisture content was tested in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM):D-2216. Table 1 summarizes the moisture content laboratory results. Table 1 also provides the depth to bearing soils identified in each test pif.. January 27, 2005 ~GB!sn -K£047JOA2 -Projectsl20047JO\KE\WP ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC Page 4 I I I ' I i l.. • Martin Property King County, Washington Table 1 Approximate Ground Surface Depth to Exploration Elevation Bearing Soil Pit (feet) (feet) EP-1 453 2 EP-2 450 2 EP-3 455 2 EP-4 462 3 EP-5 465 3 EP-6 448 3,5 EP-7 453 3 EP-8 457 2.5 EP-9 457 1.5 • Subswface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Proiect and Site Conditions Approximate Bearing Soil Elevation Existing Moisture Content (feet) (percent)' 451 14,2@ 3' 448 14,2@3-5' 453 16-3@ 3' 459 14,0@3' 462 205@3' 444,5 10.9 @4' 450 12.8@ 3.5' 454.5 15.6@ 3' 455.5 18.4@2.5' ' All samples are above optimum moisture content for compaction. The maximum dry density of one soil sample was determined using the modified Proctor test procedure (ASTM:D-1557). The results are as follows in Table 2. Table 2 Maximum Dry Density Optimum Moisture Content Samule Location Sample Type (pct)<'> (percent)(2> I EP-1@ 3' I Lodgement Till I 135.4 I 7 10 pcf = pounds per cubic foot. i2> Reported results are corrected for gravel content. January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARIB SCIENCES, INC. SGB!sn -KE04710A2 -Projects\20047/0lKE1WP Page 5 I I I I • Manin Propeny King County, Washington • Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Repon Geologic Hazards and Mitigations II. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS The following discussion of potential geologic hazards is based on the geologic, slope, and shallow ground water conditions as observed and discussed herein. 5.0 SEISMIC HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS Earthquakes occur in the Puget Lowland with great regularity. Most of these events are small and are usually not felt by humans. However, large earthquakes do occur as evidenced by the 2001, 6.8-magnitude event; the 1965, 6.5-magnitude event; and the 1949, 7 .2-magnitude event. The 1949 earthquake appears to have been the largest in this region during recorded history and was centered in the Olympia area. Evaluation of earthquake return rates indicates that an earthquake of the magnitude between 5.5 and 6.0 is likely within a given 20-year period. Generally, there are four types of potential geologic hazards associated with large seismic events: 1) surficial ground rupture; 2) seismically induced landslides; 3) liquefaction; and 4) ground motion. The potential for each of these hazards to adversely impact the proposed project is discussed below. 5 .1 Surficial Ground Rupture Generally, the largest earthquakes that have occurred in the Puget Sound area are sub-crustal events with epicenters ranging from 50 to 70 kilometers in depth. For this reason, no surficial faulting or earth rupture, as a result of deep, seismic activity has been documented, to date, in the area of the subject site. Therefore, it is our opinion, based on existing geologic data, that the risk of surface rupture impacting the proposed project is low. 5.2 Seismically Induced Landslides It is our opinion that the risk of damage to the proposed structures by seismically induced landsliding is low due to gentle slope inclinations that exist on the site. 5. 3 Liquefaction Liquefaction is a temporary loss in soil shear strength that can occur when loose granular soils below the ground water table are exposed to cyclic accelerations such as those that occur during earthquakes. The observed site soils were generally dense and silty and are not expected to be prone to liquefaction. A detailed liquefaction analysis was not completed as a part of this study, and none is warranted, in our opinion. January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. SGB!sn -KE04710A2-Projects\2004710\KE\WP Page 6 f f ' f f f I I I I . C l_ Martin Property King County, Washington 5 .4 Ground Motion • • Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Geologic Hazards and Mitigations The project site is located within a Zone 3 rating for seismic activity on a scale of 1 (lowest) to 4 (highest) based on the Seismic 'Zone Map of the United States, Figure No. 16-2 in the 1997 edition of the Uniform Building Code (UBC). This zonation is based on past earthquake activity in the Puget Sound region. As such, design recommendations in this report accommodate the possible effect of seismic activity in areas with a Zone 3 rating corresponding to a peak ground acceleration of 0.2g (a Richter magnitude 7 .5 earthquake occurring directly beneath the site) in accordance with UBC guidelines using soil type Sc. This soil type corresponds to seismic coefficients: C, = 0.33 and C,v = 0.45. Design of the project should also be consistent with 2003 International Building Code (IBC) guidelines. In accordance with the 2003 IBC, the following values should be used: Site Class "C" (Table 1615.1.1) Ss = 125% (Figure 1516(1]), F, = 1.0 (Table 1615.1.2[1]) S, = 45% (Figure 1516[2]), F, = 1.4 (Table 1615.1.2(2]) 6.0 EROSION HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS The sediments underlying the site generally contain silt and fine sand and will be sensitive to erosion, especially in the sloping portions of the site. In order to reduce the amount of sediment transport off the site during construction, the following recommendations should be followed. 1. Silt fencing should be placed around the lower perimeter of all cleared area(s). All silt fencing must be keyed into the existing sub grade a minimum of 6 inches. The fencing should be periodically inspected and maintained as necessary to ensure proper function. 2. To the extent possible, earthwork-related construction should proceed during the drier periods of the year and disturbed areas should be revegetated as soon as possible. Temporary erosion control measures should be maintained until permanent erosion control measures are established. 3. Areas stripped of vegetation during construction should be mulched and hydroseeded, replanted as soon as possible, or otherwise protected. During winter construction, hydroseeded areas should be covered with clear plastic to facilitate grass growth. January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGB!sn -KE047/0A2-Projecls\2004710\KE\WP Page 7 I ! l ,_ i I : C l_ • Martin Property King County, Washington • Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Geologic Hazards and Mitigations 4. If excavated soils are to be stockpiled on the site for reuse, measures should be taken to reduce the potential for erosion from the stockpile. These could include, but are not limited to, covering the pile with plastic sheeting, the use of low stockpiles in flat areas, and the use of straw bales/silt fences around pile perimeters. 5. Interceptor swales with rock check dams should be constructed to divert storm water from construction areas and to route collected storm water to an appropriate discharge location. 6. A rock construction entrance should be provided to reduce the amount of sediment transported off-site on truck tires. 7. All storm water from impermeable surfaces, including driveways and roofs, should be tightlined into approved facilities and not be directed onto or above steeply sloping areas (including cut and fill slopes). 7.0 LANDSLIDE HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS The project site is characterized by gentle slopes with a low landslide risk and no detailed landslide hazard analysis is warranted, in our opinion. January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. SGB!sn -KE04710A2-Projects\2004710\KE\WP Page 8 I 1 1 I I I I b L • Manin Property King County, Washington • Subswface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Repon Preliminary Design Recommendations III. PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 8.0 INTRODUCTION Our exploration indicates that, from a geotechnical standpoint, the proposed project is feasible provided the recommendations contained herein are properly followed. The bearing stratum is relatively shallow, and conventional shallow foundations and standard pavement sections should perform well with proper sub grade preparation in most areas. 9.0 SITE PREPARATION Site preparation of building and pavement areas should include re.moval of all grass, trees, brush, debris, and any other deleterious materials. If the existing structures are not part of future development plans, the structures should be demolished and any remaining foundation elements or buried utilities that are not to remain operational should be removed. All existing fill around structures that are to be demolished should be removed. Existing septic systems that are not to be reused should be decommissioned in accordance with King County Health Department requirements and removed from beneath any areas where structures or paving are planned. If any water wells exist on-site, they should be decommissioned by a licensed well driller in accordance with Washington Administrative Code Section 173-160. If any heating oil storage tanks or other similar structures are present on-site, they should be decommissioned and removed in accordance with applicable Washington State Department of Ecology regulations. Any depressions below planned final grades caused by demolition activities should be backfilled with structural fill as discussed under the Structural Fill section. The existing grass, topsoil, and organic weathered soils should be removed from areas where new buildings, paving, or other structures are planned. These materials will "swell" so.me 25 to 30 percent upon excavation. The actual observed in-place depth of sod, topsoil, and organic weathered soils at the exploration locations is presented on the exploration logs in the Appendix. After stripping, remaining roots and stumps should be removed from structural · areas. All soils disturbed by stripping and grubbing operations should be recompacted as described below for structural fill. Once excavation to subgrade elevation is complete, the resulting surface should be proof-rolled with a loaded dump truck or other suitable equipment. Any soft, loose, or yielding areas should be excavated to expose suitable bearing soils. The subgrade should then be compacted to at least 90 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density as determined by the ASTM:D-1557 test procedure. Structural fill can then be placed to achieve desired grades, if needed. January 27, 2005 SGB!sn -KE04710A2-Projects12004710\KE1WP ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC Page 9 r 1 1 I I I l. Martin Property King County, Washington 9. I Temporary Cut Slopes • • Subsu,jace Exploration, Geologic ]f,azard, and Preliminary Geotechnica/ Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations In our opinion, stable construction slopes should be the responsibility of the contractor and should be determined during construction. For estimating purposes, however, temporary unsupported cut slopes can be planned at IH:IV (Horizontal:Vertical) or flatter in the lodgement till. Permanent cut or fill slopes should not be steeper than 2H: IV. These slope angles are for areas where ground water seepage is not encountered, and assume that surface water is not allowed to flow across the temporary slope faces. If ground or surface water is present when the temporary excavation slopes are exposed, flatter slope angles will be required. As is typical with earthwork operations, some sloughing and raveling may occur and cut slopes may have to be adjusted in the field. In addition, WISHA/OSHA regulations should be followed at all times. 9 .2 Site Disturbance Most of the on-site soils contain substantial fine-grained material which makes them moisture- sensitive and subject to disturbance when wet. The contractor must use care during site preparation and excavation operations so that the underlying soils are not softened. If disturbance occurs, the softened soils should be removed and the area brought to grade with structural fill. 9. 3 Winter Construction Due to the high in-situ moisture content of most of the site soils determined by laboratory testing completed for this study, it will be necessary to dry some of the site soils during favorable dry weather conditions to allow reuse in structural fill applications. If construction takes p\ace in winter, drying is not expected to be feasible, and we anticipate that the lodgement till soils will be unsuitable for structural fill applications. Even during dry weather, site soils excavated for installation of buried utilities might not be suitable for utility backfill under paving or other structures. We recommend budgeting for backfill of buried utility trenches in structural areas with imported, select structural fill. For summer construction, significant, but unavoidable effort may be needed to scarify, aerate, and dry site soils that are above optimum moisture content to reduce moisture content prior to compaction in structural fill applications. Care should be taken to seal all earthwork areas during mass grading at the end of each workday by grading all surfaces .to drain and sealing them with a smooth-drum roller. Stockpiled soils that will be reused in structural fill applications should be covered whenever rain is possible. If winter construction is expected, crushed rock fill could be used to provide construction staging areas. The stripped sub grade should be observed by the geotechnical engineer and should then be covered with a geotextile fabric such as Mirafi 500X or equivalent. Once the January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGB/sn -KE047JOA2 -Projecrs\2004710\KE\WP Page 10 I I • Martin Property King County, Washington • Subsu,jace Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations fabric is placed, we recommend using a crushed rock fill layer at least 10 inches thick in areas where construction equipment will be used. If desired, planned roadways can be paved with asphalt treated base (A TB) for construction staging as described in the Pavement Recommendations section of this report. 10.0 STRUCTURAL FILL Structural fill may be necessary to establish desired grades. All references to structural fill in this report refer to subgrade preparation, fill type, placement, and compaction of materials as discussed in this section. .If a percentage of compaction is specified under another section of this report, the value given in that section should be used. After stripping, planned excavation, and any required overexcavation have been performed to the satisfaction of the geotechnical engineer/engineering geologist, the upper 12 inches of exposed ground should be recompacted to 90 percent of ASTM:D-1557, If the subgrade contains too much moisture, adequate recompaction may be difficult or impossible to obtain and should probably not be attempted. In lieu of recompaction, the area to receive fill should be blanketed with washed rock or quarry spalls to act as a capillary break between the new fill and the wet subgrade. Where the exposed ground remains soft and further overexcavation is impractical, placement of an engineering stabilization fabric may be necessary to prevent contamination of the free-draining layer by silt migration from below. After recompaction of the exposed ground is tested and approved, or a free-draining rock course is laid, structural fill may be placed to attain desired grades. Structural fill is defined as non-organic soil, acceptable to the geotechnical engineer, placed in maximum 8-inch loose lifts with each lift being compacted to 95 percent of ASTM:D-1557. In the case of roadway and utility trench filling, the backfill should be placed and compacted in accordance .with King County codes and standards. The top of the compacted fill should extend horizontally outward a minimum distance of 3 feet beyond the location of the perimeter footings or roadway edges before sloping down at a maximum angle of2H:1V. The contractor should note that any proposed fill soils must be evaluated by AESI prior to their use in fills. This would require that we have a sample of the material at least 72 hours in advance to perform a Proctor test and determine its field compaction standard. We have completed one such test on a representative sample of the lodgement till and the results are included in this report. Soils in which the amount of fine-grained material (smaller than the No. 200 sieve) is greater than approximately 5 percent (measured on the minus No. 4 sieve size) should be considered moisture-sensitive. Use of moisture-sensitive soil in structural fills should be limited to favorable dry weather and dry subgrade conditions. The on-site lodgement till contains substantial amounts of silt and is considered highly moisture-sensitive \_. when excavated and used as structural fill. At the time of our exploration program, soil µ January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. I_ SGB/sn -KE04710A2-Projects\2004710lKE\WP Page 11 --------------------------------------------------------------------- I I r I I \_ µ • Manin Property King County, Washington • Subswface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Repon Preliminary Design Recommendations moisture content tests indicated that all soils encountered were at moisture conditions above optimum for structural fill use. We anticipate that most excavated lodgement till soils will require aeration and drying prior to compaction in structural fill applications. Construction equipment traversing the site when the soils are wet can cause considerable disturbance. If fill is placed during wet weather or if proper compaction cannot be obtained, a select import material consisting of a clean, free-draining gravel and/or sand should be used. Free-draining fill consists of non-organic soil with the amount of fine-grained material limited to 5 percent by weight when measured on the minus No. 4 sieve fraction and at least 25 percent retained on the No. 4 sieve. 11.0 FOUNDATIONS Spread footings may be used for building support when they are founded OIi approved structural fill placed as described above, or OIi the glacial sedimellts that are prepared as recommeI1ded ill this report. Based on our observations, suitable foundation bearing soils are expected approximately 1.5 to 3.5 feet below the existing ground surface on each lot. The depth to suitable foundation bearing soils is presented in a table in the Subsurface Conditions section of this report. If existing fill is discovered around existing structures, it should be removed and replaced with structural fill, which is also suitable for foundation support. For residential structures, footings may be designed for an allowable foundatioll soil bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psi) including both dead and live loads. Detention vault foundations excavated into dense native till can be designed with a 6,000 psf maximum allowable soil bearing pressure. An increase of Olle-third may be used for short-term wind or seismic loading. Perimeter footings should be buried at least 18 inches into the surrounding soil for frost protection. However, all foundatiOIIS must penetrate to the prescribed bearing stratum and no foundations should be constructed in or above loose, organic, or existing fill soils. In addition, all footings must have a minimum width of 14 inches for one-story structures, 16 inches for two-story structures, or 18 inches for three-story structures. Anticipated settlement of footings founded as recommended should be on the order of '.J4 inch or less, with differential settlement of 1h inch or less. However, disturbed material not removed from footing trenches prior to footing placement could result in increased settlements. All footing areas should be inspected by AESI prior to placing concrete to verify that the foundation subgrades are undisturbed and construction conforms to the recommendations contained in this report. Such inspections may be required by King County. Perimeter footing drains should be provided as discussed under the section on Drainage Considerations. January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGB!sn -KE04710A2-Projects\2004710lKE\WP Page 12 I I I I r I I I • Martin Property King County, Washington • Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations It should be noted that the area bounded by lines extending downward at lH: 1 V from any footing must not intersect another footing or intersect a filled area which has not been compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM:D-1557. In addition, a l.5H:1V line extending down and away from any footing must not daylight because sloughing or raveling may eventually undermine the footing. Thus, footings should not be placed near the edge of steps or cuts in the bearing soils. 12.0 FLOOR SUPPORT If crawl space floors are used, an impervious moisture barrier should be provided above the soil surface within the crawl space. Slab-on-grade floors may be used over medium dense to very dense native soils, or over structural fill placed as recommended in the Site Preparation and Structural Fill sections of this report. Slab-on-grade floors should be cast atop a minimum of 4 inches of pea gravel or washed crushed rock to act as a capillary break. The floors should also be protected from dampness by covering the capillary break layer with an impervious moisture barrier at least 10 mils in thickness. Floor slabs that are supported by site soils prepared in accordance with the Site Preparation section of this report or by structural fill should experience V2 inch or less of settlement. 13.0 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS All footing walls, basement walls, and retaining walls should be provided with a drain at the footing elevation. Drains should consist of rigid, perforated, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe surrounded by washed pea gravel. The level of the perforations in the pipe should be set at the bottom of the footing at all locations and the drain collectors should be constructed with sufficient gradient to allow gravity discharge away from the buildings. In addition, all foundation walls taller than 3 feet .should be lined with a minimum 12-inch-thick washed gravel blanket provided to within 1 foot of finish grade that ties into the footing drain. Roof and surface runoff should not discharge into the footing drain system but should be handled by a separate, rigid, tightline drain. In planning, exterior grades adjacent to foundations should be sloped downward away from the structures to achieve surface drainage. These recommendations apply to conventional shallow foundation walls and landscape walls less than about 4 feet tall. One should refer to the following section for walls up to 12 feet tall. January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGB!sn -KE047I0A2 -Projects\2004710\KE1WP Page 13 f l r I 17 I I I L. r: C I_ • Martin Property King County, Washington • Subsu,jace Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations 14.0 CAST-IN-PLACE RETAINING WALLS AND BASEMENT WALLS All backfill behind foundation walls or around foundation units should be placed as per our recommendations for structural fill and as described in this section of the report. Horizontally backfilled walls, which are free to yield laterally at least O .1 percent of their height, may be designed using an equivalent fluid equal to 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). Fully restrained, horizontally backfilled rigid walls that cannot yield should be designed for an equivalent fluid of 50 pcf. Walls with sloping backfill up to a maximum gradient of 2H: 1 V should be designed using an equivalent fluid of 55 pcf for yielding conditions or 75 pcf for fully restrained conditions. If parking areas are adjacent to walls, a surcharge equivalent to 2 feet of soil should be added to the wall height in determining lateral design forces. As required by the 2003 IBC, retaining wall design should include a seismic surcharge pressure in addition to the equivalent fluid pressures presented above. Considering the site · soils and the recommended wall backfill materials,. we recommend a seismic surcharge pressure of 4H and 8H psf where H is the wall height in feet, for the "active" and "at-rest" loading conditions, respectfully. The seismic surcharge should be modeled as a rectangular distribution with the resultant applied at the midpoint of the wall. The lateral pressures presented above are based on the conditions of a uniform backfill consisting of excavated on-site soils, or imported structural fill compacted to 90 percent of ASTM:D-1557. A higher degree of compaction is not recommended as this will increase the pressure acting on the walls. A lower compaction may result in settlement of the slab-on-grade or other structures supported above the walls. Thus, the compaction level is critical and must be tested by our firm during placement. Surcharges from adjacent footings or heavy construction equipment must be added to the above values. Perimeter footing drains should be provided for all retaining walls as discussed under the section on Drainage Considerations. It is imperative that proper drainage be provided so that hydrostatic pressures do not develop against the walls. This would involve installation of a minimum 1-foot-wide blanket drain to within 1 foot of finish grade for the full wall height using imported, washed gravel against the walls. 14 .1 Passive Resistance and Friction Factors Lateral loads can be resisted by friction between the foundation and the natural glacial soils or supporting structural fill soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the buried portions of the foundations. The foundations must be backfilled with structural fill compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density to achieve the passive resistance provided below. We recommend the following design parameters: January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGB!sn -KE047JOA2-Projectsl2004710\KE1WP Page 14 r I I I I p I • Martin Property King County, Washington • Passive equivalent fluid = 250 pcf • Coefficient of friction = 0. 35 • Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations The above values are allowable and include a safety factor of at least 1.5. 15.0 PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS The pavement for this project is expected to be supported by medium dense, silty sand (lodgement till), recompacted, inorganic weathered soils, or structural fill soils. These soils should be suitable, with proper preparation, to allow the use of standard paving sections. Because some of the site soils were substantially above optimum moisture content at the time of our exploration program, remedial subgrade preparation might be required below the paving. Remedial preparation measures could include removal of some of the existing site soils below the planned pavement section and restoring the planned subgrade elevation with select imported structural fill, treating the native soil subgrade with Portland cement to stabilize the wet soils, or aeration and drying of existing soHs prior to compaction of the road sub grades. We recommend that the final determination of how to prepare the road sub grades be made at the time of construction when weather and field conditions are known. The King County standard paving section for residential access streets is 2 inches of Class B asphalt concrete paving (ACP) above 3 inches of ATB above 6 inches of gravel borrow. All depths given are compacted depths. All paving materials, base course materials, and placement procedures should comply with suitable standard specifications such as the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction or other suitable specifications. All structural fill and all native subgrades less than 4 feet below finished grade for a planned roadway should be compacted to 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density as determined by ASTM:D-1557. Prior to structural fill placement or to placement of base course materials over native subgrades, the area should be proof-rolled under the observation of AES! with a loaded dump truck or other suitable equipment to identify any soft or yielding areas. Any soft or yielding areas should be repaired prior to continuing work. If desired, ATB can be used to provide a construction working surface. After the buried utilities are in place, the sub grade is prepared, the gravel borrow is placed, and the A TB is laid and compacted. This A TB surface is then used for construction access, and once most of the heavy construction traffic has subsided, any damaged pavement areas are repaired prior to final surfacing with ACP. January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. SGB!sn -KE047JOA2-Projectsl20047JO\KE\WP Page 15 f l [ r 1- 1 h C L --------~-------------- • Martin Property King County, Washington • Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations 16.0 PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MONITORING At the time of this report, site grading, lot layouts, structural plans, and construction methods have not been finalized, and the recommendations presented herein are preliminary. We are available to provide additional geotechnical consultation as the project design develops and possibly changes from that upon which this report is based. We recommend that AESI perform a geotechnical review of the plans prior to final design completion. In this way, our earthwork and foundation recommendations may be properly interpreted and implemented in the design. We are also available to provide geotechnical engineering and monitoring services during construction. The integrity of the foundations for buildings and of new pavement depends on proper site preparation and construction procedures. In addition, engineering decisions may have to be made in the field in the event that variations in subsurface conditions become apparent. Construction monitoring services are not part of the current scope of work. If these services are desired, please let us know and we will prepare a cost proposal. We have enjoyed working with you on this study and are confident that these recommendations will aid in the successful completion of your projegt. If you should have any questions or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Kirkland, Washington ~ ~ ,&,e,L,.(. 4 - Sus7m G. Beckham, P.E. Project Engineer Attachments: Figure 1: Figure 2: Appendix: January 27, 2005 Vicinity Map Site and Exploration Plan Exploration Logs Laboratory Test Results SGB/sn -KE047JOA2 -Projects\20047/0\KE\WP l PPIAIII 11 /20/ Ola Kurt D. Merriman, P.E. Principal Engineer ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Page 16 T"" IO ~ w ~ T"" T"" a: 0 t-- ::, ~ ~ w (.!) w ...J u: ~ < z-< (.) 0 ci rn 0 z i= z -; ,_ "Cl 0 C) a: u (/) N 0.. ') 3S .-I [ f!: NI fUOQT r--. w I-.-1 :i:: (/) ¢ I-.-1 wl-N 1/) rl V) ~ I-r-3S lt\:J w 1/) .... LO w (/) (/) co ..... (/') 3S l8vT i= (D -· .... ~ r JS z 0 :z:: I-I-..... .... 1./) a.~~ Vl It:) N .... 3S f\'r/ t-CJNlvI 3$ {\'fl ct a:: :i: 1/1 ~ w (/) t-g;~ V')I w :i:: ~~ ~ t-C .... t; V) z V) i= 1/) zz~ ..... N N N N ,,. rl --z rl ..-t (.) li: ::) -~--.. - ><o ~o (!) z i: u KJ C ,; • u ~ C • u "' .c m ... .. .. w ,, rm • ... .. L u 0 .~· "' ~ ... c( Jp:>·,ljJUPfll OW•OllJ!lleW 0 (L1'0 ------- I l I i I I I 1 · ' I r I l I-. l- I \ . • • APPENDIX r ' r ~ ~ p :r " it;- d ! g I ~l ui 0 0 N ci z C 0 -0 ~ C E c1! ' !'! ·a <f) -0 " C ·~ <.9 /, I'? .. 0 <) ~ " ui 0 0 N ci z 0 " 0 0 "' "- " 0 :, J; "" 0 "' !'! 0 <f) Well-graded gra nd GW gravel with sand, little to no fines GP Poorly-graded gravel and gravel with sand, little to no fines Silty gravel and silty GM gravel with sand Clayey gravel and GC clayey gravel with sand Well-graded sand and sw sand with gravel, little to no fines SP SM Poorly-graded sand and sand with gravel, little to no fines Silty sand and silty sand with gravel Clayey sand and SC clayey sand with gravel !(1--1---------l Silt, sandy sill, gravelly silt, ML sill with sand or gravel CL OL Clay of low to medium plasticity; silty, sandy, or gravelly clay, lean clay Organic clay or silt of low plasticity Terms Describing Relat Density and Consistency Coarse- Grained Soils Fine- Grained Soils Density Very Loose Loose Medium Dense Dense Very Dense Consistency Very Soft Saft Medium Sliff Stiff Very Stiff Hard SPT{'lblows/foot O to4 4 {O 10 10 to 30 30 to 50 >50 SPT{'lblows/foot Oto 2 2 to4 4108 8 to 15 15 to 30 >30 Test Symbols G = Grain Size M = Moisture Content A = Atterberg Limits C = Chemical DD = Dry Density K = Permeability Descriptive Term Boulders Component Definitions Size Range and Sieve Number Larger than 12· Cobbles Gravel Coarse Grc~vel Fine Gravel Sand Coarse Sand Medium Sand Fine Sand Si{\ and Clay 3"to 12· 3' to Na. 4 (4.75 mm) 3' to 3/4' 3/4' ta No. 4 (4. 75 mm) No. 4 (4.75 mm) lo No. 200 (0.075 mm) Na. 4 (4.75 mm) to Na. 10 (2.00 mm) No. 1 O (2.00 mm) ta No. 40 (0.425 mm) No. 40 (0.425 mm) lo No. 200 (0.075 mm) Smaller than No. 200 (0.075 mm) (3 ) Estimated Percentage Moisture Content Ory -Absence of moisture, dusty, dry ta the touch Component Percentage by Weight <5 Trace Few Little With Sta 10 15 ta 25 -Non-primary coarse constituents: z.. 15% -Fines content between 5% and 15% Slightly Moist -Perceptible moisture Moist -Damp but no visible water Very Moist -Water visible but not free draining Wet -Visible free water, usually from below waler table Symbols Sampler Type Blows/6" or portion of B-Cement groot surface seal Elastic silt, clayey silt, silt 2_0,, OD M H with micaceous or Split-Spoon / • " • Sampler Type Description Bentonite seal diatomaceous fine sand or Sampler W..WJ--l'sa,,il,_t -,.,.-------! (SPT) Clay of high plasticity, 3.0" OD Split-Spoon Sampler 3.25" OD Split-Spoon Ring Sampler ,., :: Filter pack with :: blank casing _-:. section -0 " C CH sandy or gravelly clay, fat clay with sand or gravel Bulk sample 3.0" OD Thin-Wall Tube Sampler • (including Shelby tube) ·_. Screened casing :-· or Hydrotip ·~ <.9 /, C u: ~-1-----------l Grab Sample 1J/ff. Organic clay or silt of o Portion not recovered ffffjf OH medium to high <11 Percentagebydryweight ffff plasticity (2l (SPn Standard Penetration Test l---'----f;:,:26t!--+----------i (ASTM D-1586) -_. with filter pack :. End cap <4> Depth of ground water ,1 A TD = Al time of drilling '!'/. Static water level (date) .2:--1! 0 Peat, muck and other l3l In General Accordance with ~ e g PT highly organic soils Standard Practice for Description I o and ldentificalion of Sails (ASTM D-2488) (SJ Combined USCS symbols used for fines between 5% and 15% Classifications of soils in this report are based on visual field and/or laboratory observations, which include density/consistency, moisture condition, grain size, and plasticity estimates and should not be construed to imply field or laboratory testing unless presented herein. Visual-manual and/or laboratory classlfication methods of ASTM 0-2487 and 0·2488 were used as an identification guide for the Unified Soil Classification System. Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~~~ Exploratio'n Log Key FIGURE A-1 i i I I I·; r. ~ 0 0 N .. ~ ~ ~- ~ "' < ~ ~ i M a. >-0 "' g ,5 C. ~ 0 1 - 2 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-1 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AES1) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil grading to loose, moist, dark brown, silty SAND, with gravel roots, cobbles and abundant organics. Till Medium dense, moist, gray mottled, silty SAND, with gravel, cobbles, trace boulders. Dense at 3', lightly cemented and no longer mottled. Very dense below 9'. Bottom of exploration pit at depth 10 feet No ground water. No caving. Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Project No. KE04710A Logged by: SGB Approved by: ~ ~ ~ [Jj ~ 1/12/05 i i [ I ) I I I g 5 "-"' 0 1 - 2 I I LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-2 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, lnc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil Weathered Till Loose, moist, brown, silty SAND, with gravel, roots and organics. Till Medium dense, moist, slightly mottled gray, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. 3 4 -Dense below 4' and lightly cemented, few boulders. 5 6 - 7 8 - 9 - 10 11 12 - 13 14 - 15 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - Sandier below 8'. Bottom of exploration pit at depth 11 feet Slow seepage from north at 5'. No caving. i-------------------------------------------~ Martin Property j King County, WA ,'. ~ Associated Earth Sciences, Inc: Project No. KE04710A -Logged by: SGB ~ ~ fJiiliij ~ ~ i ~-~ ~~~~U 1M~ ~------------------------------------------- r i I ' i 1·- I I I. g £ C. " 0 1 2 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-3 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. Thls summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil Weathered Till Loose, moist, brown and dark brown, silty SAND, with gravel roots and organics. Till Medium dense, moist, gray mottled, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. 3 - 4 -Dense at 4' and weakly cemented. 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 Very dense below 8'. g Bottom of exploration pit at depth 8 feet No ground water. No caving. 10 - 11 12 - 13 - 14. - 15 · - 16 - 17 18 - 19 - ~----------------------------------------------:: i ~ Martin Property King County, WA 0 ~ Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. p · N KE 1 A .c roiect o. 047 0 ;g Logged by: SGB ~ ~ fJlliij ~ ~ Approved by: ~ ~ ~ C!41 '-fl 1/12/05 ~--------------------------------'--------------- r I I I r r I I I r '·· ~ 0 ~ ...: ~ ~ .!l 0: " " ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ L) ~ g ,; Q. ID 0 1 - 2 - 3 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-4 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil Weathered Till Loose to medium dense, moist, brown, silty SAND, with gravel roots and few pockets of organics and wood. Till Medium dense to dense, very moist, gray, silty SAND, with gravel, cobbles. 4 5 6 - 7 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 17 - 18 - 19 Bottom of exploration pit at depth 7 feet Moderate seepage at 3'. Slight caving 2' to 3'. Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Project No. KE04710A Logged by: SGS ~ ~ ~ [!j ~ Approved by: 1/12/05 r g = a. 0 1 - LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-5 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil Weathered Till Loose to medium dense, moist, brown, silty SAND, with gravel, trace roots and pockets of organics 2 -and wood. 3 Till Medium dense, moist, gray mottled, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. 4 -Dense below 4', weakly cemented. 5 - 6 - 7 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - Very dense and moderately cemented below 6'. Bottom of exploration pit at depth 7 feet No ground water. No caving. ~----------------------------------------------± "' ! « <.? ~ ~ Logged by: SGB Approved by: Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~[tjO] Project No. KE04710A 1/12/05 ~ ------------------------------------- I L ' g £ C. w 0 1 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-6 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AES!) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil Weathered Till Loose, moist, dark brown and brown, silty SAND, with gravel and roots and organics. Till Medium dense, moist, gray, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. Dense at 4', few boulders, sandier with depth. Very dense below 8'. Bottom of exploration pit at depth 11 feet Slow seepage at 3.5'. No caving. ~--20-------------------------------------------1!---------------------------------------------- :f i -"i ~ ~ " ~ ~ 0 r Logged by: SGB Approved by: Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~~~ Project No. KE0471 DA 1/12/05 ~---------------------------------------------- i r ~ 0 0 N "f. '" • 0 I C .!'l I o'. C " < 0 ~ v j 0 ~ l ~ ~ !;1 g = 0. " 0 I I LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-7 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurtace conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil 1 -~---------------~W~e-a~t~h-er_e_d~T=i=ll---------------- 2 _ Loose to medium _dense, moist, brown and dark brown, silty SAND, with gravel roots and organics. 3 Till Medium dense to dense, moist, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - Strongly cemented and very dense below 6'. Bottom of exploration pit at depth 8 feet No ground water. No caving. Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Logged by: SGB ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Approved by: Project No. KE04710A 1/12/05 r ~ 0 0 ~ "i "" • , \ C ~ ~ r ~ 0 ~ • 0 ~ ~ r !;? g £ C. <1> D 1 2 - 3 .. I I LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-8 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil Till Medium dense, moist, brown grading to gray, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. 4 _ Dense and lightly cemented below 3'. 5 - 6 -Very dense below 6'. 7 - 8 Bottom of exploration pit at depth 8 feet - 9 -No ground water. No caving. 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - Logged by: SGB Approved by: Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~~~ - Project No. KE04710A 1/12/05 l r I ' ~ ~ 0 0 N :f_ " ~ -"l ,: " ;i ~ ~ 0 M Q. >-t) ~ g £ D. "' 0 1 - 2 - 3 - I I LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-9 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil Medium dense to dense, very moist, gray, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. 4 -Mottled and medium dense to 4'. Dense below 4'. 5 - 6 - 7 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - Trace boulders, very dense below 5'. Bottom of exploration pit at depth 7 feet Slow seepage at 3'5" from south. Slight caving 2' to 5'. Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Logged by: SGB ~.~~~~ Approved by: Project No. KE04710A 1/12/05 ' I r I I l i- i ) l l b 1_ Associated Earth 'ciences, Inc. • Proctor Analysis ASTM D1557, D698 Date Sampled Project Project No. Soil Description 12-Jan-05 Martin Property KE04710A Tested By Location EB/EP No. Depth Light brown silty SAND with KWL Eps gravel I Percent passing 3/4" sieve: 83% ASTM D1557 Method C Automatic Tamper A Mold Number 1 2 3 Remarks B Water Added field dry dry C Wt. of Wet Soil + 24.420 24.760 24.500 Mold /lbl D Wt. of Mold (lb) 14.090 14.090 14.090 E Wt. of Wet Soil (lb) 10.330 10.670 10.410 F Wet Density, (pcf) 137.733 142.267 138.800 G Wt. of Pan {lb) 0.735 0.735 0.660 H Wt. of Wet Soil + 11.075 11.925 11.125 Pan <lb\ J Wt. of Dry Soil + 9.865 10.920 10.420 Pan (lb) K Wt. of Water (lb) 1.210 1.005 0.705 M Wt. of Dry Soil (lb) 9.130 10.185 9.760 N Moisture Content 13.3 9.9 7.2 '%\ 0 Dry Density (pct) 121.6 129.5 129.4 z For a 6 inch mold: Z = 0.075 For a 4" mold: Z = 0.0333 140.0 Test Results: Optimum Moisture Percentage: 8.5 135.0 Maximum Drv Densitv: 130.0 130.0 ,;. ? I""'-. ·~ .;:-125.0 Correction for oversize: ASTM D4718 ~ u ". Corrected Moisture Percentage: 7.0 ; .!'!, 120.0 Corrected Maximum Drv Densitv: 135.4 " 115.0 Assumed Specific Gravity: 2.7 110.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 moisture content, % ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. 911 Fifth Ave., Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98033 425-827-7701 FAX 425-827-5424 f . s s o c i a't e d · Ea rt h Sc i e. es , I n c . • Moisture Content ASTM D 2216 n fi ;;l I D te Sampled ' 1. . 2/2005 rested By ~ >T Sample ID. s' ?t Weight+ Pan / y Weight+ Pan 1/Veight of Pan V ~ight of Moisture I t,, y Weight of Soil 'lo Moisture ! f'·mple ID 11 ~t Weight+ Pan l Dry Weight+ Pan 1··?ight of Pan / ?ight of Moisture Dry Weight of Soil r Moisture ,· i mple ID l.et Weight+ Pan ~ry Weight+ Pan \ eight of Pan Weight of Moisture r,. Weight of Soil ' •1 Moisture I i ,mplelD ~vet Weight+ Pan Dry Weight+ Pan ' \ eight of Pan t. eight of Moisture Dry Weight of Soil ) Moisture I 1·' C Project Project No. Soil Description Martin Prooertv KE04710A Location EB/EP No. I Depth EP's EP-1 @3' EP-2@3.5' 2316 1730 2057 1542 227 221 259 188 1830 1321 14.2 14.2 EP-4@3' EP-5@3' 1515 1256 1355 1080 215 223 160 176 1140 857 14.0 20.5 EP-6@4' EP-7@3.5' 1528 1706 1400 1537 226 221 128 169 1174 1316 10.9 12.8 EP-9@2.5' 1502 1300 202 202 1098 18.4 ASSOC/A TED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. 911 5th Ave., Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98033 425-827-7701 FAX 425-827-5424 EP-3@3' 1896 1662 223 234 1439 16.3 /vfll +t.w.J JM/ EP-6 1498 1278 220 220 1058 20.8 EP-8@3' 1510 1336 221 174 1115 15.6 ~ ~ • • .,___ __ _ I . . , •. X 5d £<SDENT Fal YARD DRAIN YARD DRAIN ~ INGRESS AND EGRESS T0?-459.86 TOP-461.13 QJY IE 6" PVC N•457.99 Ee• COHC N•-07.60 -· ~UP , IE 6'" PVC S-'58.08 IE 6" PVC S•-4SM·7 I -,---/---------------· ___ _.UP _ , 661.26 U? I ( " ; --, -------------.. ·, ... & ~ '. --\,, ----;...o.._---~--...c.!!.-_____ _ I L .. ' \ I -~ , i, f • • -------• .-"!. '()(')·4Jt>-(:}3,'.0-m; ,· -:-->88"20'~2 "E 631.25' ', / / !!', I 'J / J -:·:::~---::_·:c.--.c.c-.~~-·~CC_';:., --._ \ ': I ' • ,. [ &" etwc. 1£.•449.6'· CATOt BASIN TCP•'50.4J 1E 12" PYC S-4-48.SJ :l:.tf' KNOCKOOT N-448.7 CAl<>I BASU< TOP-"6-54 IE 12" PYC N-444.84 IE 12'" P\,'C S-444.S4 in .., '" N .., / / \ \ \ 0 ,6' \ '· \ \ • EP-2 / / / / \ \ \ \ ' ... /'-, ' ~ -~ -.,.~ 0 0 rn~ · .. / ' , ssa"2o'4R . 120.03 ~I · . 'f' ", a EP-5 i 14' .'.Si \ t · • EP-1 \ \ \ f ' B \ ·r=JEu \ \ \ \ \ \ CUL""'T E8'06"P\'C 1£ .. 450.55 --©b~~ e:re ---f" \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ • EP-3 \ \ \ • EP-8 \ I I I I I I 1243i 1481H AVE. SE 1 S10RY """' FRAllt S1RUC1U<E j ...... I ~---~:-;'.--.; I ')>t: 1··· . '. --...,_ r "'"" 0 * Jl:YL J n ' '\ ; ! \ ' ' "· \ \ \ \ '\. ' \ \ \ ,o~.-,,;, \ UP '/It ------------0- '~ ',; g: l\ S001T36"W 14.00'· ,.01 I I I I ·1 I I I / I 0, " ' I '", J L-~-...J \ • EP-4 \ \ \ !S' ~I ~I ,- I t CULIE<T IE 12" pve,....uo \ CULV"o -··-··-··-·· .,.. .... ; I\ \ ; ! ' :q \ 0 \ \ \ \ l'--~ '- \ ·,• EP~ Ob\ --~ f \ ; I \ \ \ ' -; .' ,:-.:: ::~-.. ,~ --- / LEGEND '-, " ! \ \ '\ '-, \ \ '<(, \ \ \ '-, 0 M1Jj -~ ----- \ \ \, II EP-1 • Approximate location of exploration pit Reference: Triad Associates \ \ \ ' \ \ ·, ----......... \ \ \ ', • EP-7 '--. --\ ,_ ~w..------ \ \ '·, \ '· ................. ____ ~ ·, \ .,,.-·- / \ \ I MJOO ...... \ \ \ ·, \ \ '· ', I \ I :o ,) • EP-9 '- 0"_1:--,,/ .--I :--::,- 661.06 5$..-11 '\ ' ' '- ·--,,, .!llml '' ,...--- \ \ I \ \ \ \] ,1-. . ' ~ ~ I lb I o ,z I I· '~ ,~------------ 0 I '" w "' en '~ : ~ c( Ii• ::c I i I-a, .., I ... J, I ', 1 J\ t---------150'-----------I I I ,raft ... ' \ . \ _j, / -/ \,.- $' I \ I ··-··-·-··-·-··-··----.J I 0 ca D ~ ~OOY ..... "'"' ..... -o-"" N A ,., "" FEET 1=========================================== (..: Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN FIGURE 2 r ~ l:iiii!i fllliil ~ ~ MARTIN PROPERTY ' ~ ~ ~ t_:w L.fl KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ;, DATE 01/05 PROJECT NO. KE04710A ,.-- . . , • Scharer, Karen From: christiana.schumann@excite.com Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 6:34 PM To: Scharer, Karen Subject: RE: Questions Regarding File#L05P0019 Karen, Our address is: Christi Schumann 12502 145th Pl SE Renton, WA 98059 Thanks for sending the report! Christi •• ---On Mon 03/12, Scharer, Karen< Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV > wrote: From: Scharer, Karen[mailto:Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV] To: christiana.schuma1U1@excite.com Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 08:21:34 -0700 Subject: RE: Questions Regarding File#L05P0019 ------------------ Page I of2 Please provide your mailing address and we will send you a copy of the DDES report & recommendation,to the Hearing Examiner for the plat With this report & recommendation is a map showing the location of open space & clarification ofth~ portion of 125th to be improved (that portion west of the plat entry). East of the plat entry to 148th Ave SE will'not be improved as part of this plat application, if the hearing examiner agrees with our recommendation. Karen J. Scharer Program/Project Manager II Current Planning Section Land Use Services Division Department Of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055 206-296-7114 FAX 206-296-7051 karen.scharer@metrokc.gov From: christiana.schumann@excite.com [mailto:christiana.schumann@excite.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 8: 13 PM To: Scharer, Karen Subject: Questions Regarding File#LOSP0019 03/14/2007 , .... • • Page 2 of2 Hello, Karen, I recently received a Notice ofSEPA Threshold Determination, Plat Recommendation & Plat Hearing regarding file#: L05P0019. have a few questions regarding the project. I'm not sure if you are the correct person to contact or whether I should contact the applicant (Camwest -Sara Slatten). I am a homeowner on the corner of SE 125th St and 145th Pl SE, so the proposed subdivision will be directly behind my home. Here are my questions: 1) Are there any plans to pave SE !25th St? ls that part of this application? (Currently, it is a dirt road that does not actually intersect with 145th Pl SE.) 2) Is it possible to get a map of the proposed development? (We were told previously that the greenspace behind our home would stay intact with any future development. I would like to check to see if this is still in the plans.) Thank you for your time. You can contact me at this e-mail ( christiana.schumann@excite.com) or at 206-792-6370. Sincerely, Christi Schumann Join Excite! -http_://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! Join Excite! -bHn://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! 03/14/2007 .;· .. - ® • King County Depa11ment of Developtncnt and Environmental Services BOO Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 911055-1219 March 22, 2007 Martin Plat Hearing Testimony of Raymond E. Florent, PLS My name is Raymond E. Florent, PLS, and I am the Chief Land Surveyor for the Land Use Services Division (LUSD), of the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES). I am also a licensed Professional Land Surveyor in the states of Washington and Oregon, with experience as a Title Engineer. I have examined the records and deeds of Mr. Phung and Cam West Development as they relate to Martin and Shamrock plats. Mr. Phung's concerns relate to strips of land that are not included within the boundaries of Martin Plat. Said strips are contained within the recorded adjoining J;il"1~plat of Shamrock. Mr. Phung has indeed paid taxes on the above strips for several years, although, neither Mr. Phung's deed nor the original Cam West Development deed for the Shamrock property included the above strips. It appears that the original owners of much of the surrounding properties had divided their large parcel into several smaller parcels, which included all of the above land. Since the original owners did not include the above strips in the properties that that they sold, it was the opinion of this Department that the record title for said strips was still held by the original owners or their heirs. Cam West Development worked with their title company, and not only located the heirs to the strips, but secured deeds to the land. Mr. Phung met with Joe Miles, PE, Division Director, Land Use Services Division, DDES, and me approximately one year ago to discuss these issues. At the conclusion of our meeting, Mr. Phung was still of the opinion that the ci z -:c :c X w ~ a, C: .E "' X UJ C, C: ·c: "' a, ::i::: >, -C: ci 'O ::, a, 0 z > '-' 'a, E '-' C, Q) Q) C: ~ er S2 • • March 22, 2007 Martin Plat Hearing Testimony of Raymond E. Florent, PLS Page 2 of2 strips of land belonged to him. We discussed the option that he hire an Attorney that specializes in land use, since it appeared to us to be a private matter. Mr. Phung did not appeal the Shamrock plat. Mr. Phung's did not file a timely LUPA action following the final land use decision regarding the Shamrock plat, and, to the best of my knowledge, has not filed a Lis Pendens to date. For the above reasons, the Department would like to ask that Mr. Examiner set aside Mr. Phung's concerns as a private matter between the affected parties and not as a concern to the Martin plat that would more appropriately be addressed in a different venue. Raymond E. Florent, PLS Chief Land Surveyor Land Use Services Division ,,.. l March 19, 2007 Subject: Continued complaint and concerns Reference: Proposed Plat of Martin, File# LOSP0019; Proposed Ordinance 2007-0082 Dear Mr. Steve Van Patten: I send this letter to you because recently I received a package from DDES pertaining to the above subject. The package did not provide the name of the sender. However, your name was shown in one of the attachments of the referenced document. Furthermore, I had contacted you in the past on this subject. Please forward this letter to the correct engineer or manager for me if you are not the right ones, Thank you. After reading the information on page 9, section N, of the referenced Ordinance, I continue to raise my objections to the referenced proposal as follow: 1. I would like to know the reasons why my claim of ownership of the 16-foot strip was rejected; and why my concerns were considered moot. I do not believe there was any time DDES informed me in writing of its evaluations ofmy previous concerns. Section N only shows DDES's decisions, but no reasons were provided. Again, with supporting documents, I claimed ownership of the two easements because: a) Both the 16' x 50' and 16' x 6311' strips were on my tax bills since the time I bought the property. b) The combined area of these two strips of land is Y., acres. The main lot is 5 ac. That's why my entire lot is shown as 5.25 acres -this figure was on King County map, and is STILL shown in the Attachment Sa of the referenced proposal. c) At least two other older documents also list my property as 5.25 acres. d) Camwest unethically and fraudulently switched ownership of my entire lot to their name -since then they were able to file for ownership of these strips of land because eon papers they were the owner of the property. e) If the two strips of land belong to others, why didn't the true owners use their own deeds of trust with their own real estate tax account to sell their properties? The facts were Camwest and other people filed Quit Claims using my tax ID account number! This is outright fraud! f) I paid tax, used, and spent time and money to maintain these strips of land since 1987, thus if these strips ofland belong to someone else, then I should have the right to claim under adverse possession rule. I have never seen nor spoken to the "owners". g) In 2002, I granted KCWD # 90's request to route water line under these strips of land. Obviously, KCWD 90 legal personnel knew to whom they submitted their request. h) In September 2005 Camwest offered me, as reimbursement, approximately $20,885 for all taxes, legal and miscellaneous expenses incurred to me due to their wrongful actions. I rejected their offer as inadequate. IfCamwest rightfully purchased the land and did not act fraudulently, they would not have to compensate! Exhibit No. _.,25=----- ltem No. l...P:SfOO/'}' Received 3 • 2 '2 • 0'3-- King County Hearing Examiner • ~' . i) In year 2000, Camwest met with me and expressed their interest in my property and easement rights. I did not accept Camwest's proposal. 2. I do not believe it is proper to tum the above two strips of land, which is a private easement, into SE125th St without my consent. There is a document on this easement. I have never been consulted, nor my approval sought, to tum them into a public street. I have waited very patiently for over two years, and hoped that you will evaluate my concerns professionally. Sincerely, Andy Phung 9333 57 Ave West Mukilteo, WA 98275 425-342-0387 (W) Scharer, Karen From: Sent: To: Subject: Karen, Floren!, Ray Wednesday, June 28, 2006 6: 13 PM Scharer, Karen RE: L05P0019 -Martin Subdivision RE: L05P0019-Martin Subdivision I have reviewed the infom1ation submitted by Mr. Phung, relating to his claim of ownership of a 16 foot strip of land adjoining a portion of his southern property line and to the east. This information appears to be the same information that he submitted with the Shamrock Development. Unfortunately, I do not find any new documentation that would that would further support Mr. Phung's claim. If he feels that our decision was made in error, he may want to file an appeal when the preliminary approval decision is made. Thanks, Ray Raymond E. Florent, PLS DOES Chief Land Surveyor I Engineer IV Land Use Services Division Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 (206) 296-6790 Fax (206) 296-6613 1 Exhibit No . .,,.2.=-"-1 ___ _ Item No. L O"S,0 O 01 ~ Received '3 '2. 2.-CJ Z: King County Hearing Examiner Scharer, Karen From: Sent: To: Subject: Karen, Florent, Ray Thursday, June 22, 2006 2:42 PM Scharer, Karen RE: Martin Property Resubmittal Letter #2 Unless you have received something that I am unaware of, the only new information that I can recall, is at least one e-mail from Mr. Phung and at least one e-mail from Lanny. Neither of which would have altered our decision. Thanks, Ray Raymond E. Florent, PLS DDES Chief Land Surveyor/ Engineer IV Land Use Services Division Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 (206) 296-6790 Fax (206) 296-6613 -----Original Message----- From: Scharer, Karen Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 2:15 PM To: Florent, Ray Subject: RE: Martin Property Resubmittal Letter #2 Ray, Please determine if any new information was submitted by Mr. Phung, and if so please review and determine if it alters your opinion. Thanks >Karen J. Scharer >Program/Project Manager II >Current Planning Section >Land Use Services Division >Department Of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale >Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055 > >206-296-7114 FAX 206-296-7051 >karen.scharer@metrokc.gov -----Original Message----- From: Florent, Ray I Exhibit No. __:Z=3'----- ltem No. LO Sf O 0/ I} Received 3 · 2..l.. • D'f King County Hearing Examiner Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 12:49 PM To: Scharer, Karen Cc: sslatten@camwest.com; VanPatten, Steve Subject: FW: Martin Property Resubmittal Letter #2 Karen, Mr. Phung had raised his concerns during the review of Shamrock Heights. I met with Joe Miles to discuss information submitted from both sides, and it was decided that we did not have sufficient evidence to not record the plat, pursuant to King County Code 19A.08.020. Therefore, my recommendation would be to proceed toward the hearing with the Martin Property Plat, where Mr. Phung would have the opportunity to present his case to the Examiner. Thanks, Ray Raymond E. Florent, PLS ODES Chief Land Surveyor/ Engineer IV Land Use Services Division Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 (206) 296-6790 Fax (206) 296-6613 -----Original Message----- From: Sara Slatten [mailto:sslatten@camwest.com] Sent: Thursday, June 22, 200611:04 AM To: Scharer, Karen Cc: Florent, Ray Subject: Martin Property Resubmittal Letter #2 Karen, Attached is the resubmittal letter for the Martin Property. The original along w/ the requested additional copies will be submitted to your attention tomorrow to DOES. In the meantime, this letter summarizes our response to our neighbor An T. Phung. This dispute dates back to our adjacent Shamrock Heights plat which recorded last year. I've left a message for Ray Florent requesting a conf call between the three of us so we can discuss further. We look forward to moving on in the review process and ideally getting to hearing soon. Thanks, Sara Slatten -----Original Message----- From: Sara Slatten [mailto:sslatten@camwest.com] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 7:55 AM To: Sara Slatten Subject: 2 • i •• • MARTIN PROPERTY 13 -LOT SUBDIVISION Permit Approval Conditions Document Fire System Review Tracking Number: LOSP0019 Revised -1/25/07 MAIN FILE COPY The following conditions apply to the Fire Engineering approval of the above referenced preliminary plat: AA02 MUDD Any questions regarding the fire review of this plan should be directed to: Bill Mudd, Fire Engineering Telephone: (206) 296-6785. *** SPRINKLER REQUIREMENT *** All future residences constructed within this subdivision are required to be sprinklered NFPA 13D unless the requirement is removed by the King County Fire Marshal or his/her designee. The Fire Code requires all portions of the exterior walls of structures to be within 150 feet (as a person would walk via an approved route around the building) from a minimum 20-foot wide, unobstructed driving surface. To qualify for removal of the sprinkler requirement driving surfaces between curbs must be a minimum of28 feet in width when parking is allowed on one side of the roadway, and at least 36 feet in width when parking is permitted on both sides. NOTE: The above unobstructed width requirements also apply to the roadways accessing the subdivision. FHOl FIRE HYDRANT WATERMAIN PERMITS A separate permit is required for the installation of water mains and/or fire hydrants. Submit three (3) copies of drawings and specifications to DDES Building Services Division Permit Service Center for a permit application. Review and approval by Fire Engineering Section is required prior to installation. Plans shall include, but are not limited to; pipe sizes, pipe type, valves/fittings, thrust blocks and/or rodding and material listings. Fire hydrants shall be installed per K.C.C. Title 17 Water mains shall be installed and tested per A WW A standards and/or NFPA#24 (STANDARDS FOR PRN ATE FIRE HYDRANTS AND WA TERMAINS); as applicable. Ref. 1001.4 UFC NOTE: UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED, ANY W ATERMAIN OR FIRE HYDRANT DETAILS ON BUILDING PLANS/ORA WINGS HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED OR APPROVED. FH74 PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL Preliminary Fire Engineering approval has been granted based upon the following information provided. To obtain final Fire Engineering approval, the following item(s) must be submitted to the DDES permit service center; reviewed and approved: Fire Systems Review Approval Conditions Page I of2 ! -· •.,; • • L Certificate of Water Availability. (Provided by appropriate water purveyor). Valid one year from date of signature. Minimum acceptance flow shall be I 000 gallons per minute at 20 pounds per square inch residual pressure. II. Three copies of plans indicating: A. Fire hydrant(s) location -measured by vehicular travel distance. (K.C.C. Title 17) Residential 1. 700 ft. maximum spacing. 2. Not more than 350 ft. from each lot. B. Watermain placement (K.C.C. Title 17) 1. Source (i.e.) supply connection. 2. Main sizes identified. C. Fire access roads Ref. IFC, Sections 501 through 503, 2003 addition 1. Minimum 20 ft. wide unobstructed -13 '6" vertical clearance, unobstructed. All-weather surface, able to withstand 25 tons. (See sprinkler note above) 2. Fire access roads in excess of 150 feet (dead-ends), must have an approved tum-around area. Access road shall extend to within 150 ft. of all portions of building exterior walls. Required tum-arounds must be a minimum 80-foot diameter: or meet approved "hammerhead" requirements **********Including temporary turnarounds************ 3. Fire access roads must provide 20-foot minimum inside turning radius and 40 outside turning radius when said roads change direction. 4. Fire access roads shall not exceed 15% grade. 5. The required width of any fire apparatus access road shall not be obstructed in any manner, including parking of vehicles. Minimum required widths and clearances established under this section shall be maintained at all times. D. Marking when required, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads and prohibit the obstruction thereof or both. Ref. IFC, Sections 501 through 503, 2003 edition FH77 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL Final plat approval requires an inspection and approval of the fire hydrant and water main installation by a King County Fire Inspector, prior to recording. Call [888]546-7728 to schedule an inspection; after a permit to install has bee obntained from DDES; Fire Protection Engineering. Fire Systems Review Approval Conditions Page 2 of2 ~· .. . -. • Permit Approval Conditions Document Fire System Review Tracking Number: LOSPOO 19 Revised -12/8/06 • The following conditions apply to the Fire Engineering approval of the above referenced preliminary plat: AA02 MUDD Any questions regarding the fire review of this plan should be directed to: Bill Mudd, Fire Engineering Telephone: (206) 296-6785. *** SPRINKLER REQUIREMENT *** All future residences constructed within this subdivision are required to be sprinklered NFPA 13D unless the requirement is removed by the King County Fire Marshal or his/her designee. The Fire Code requires all portions of the exterior walls of structures to be within 150 feet (as a person would walk via an approved route around the building) from a minimum 20-foot wide, unobstructed driving surface. To qualify for removal of the sprinkler requirement driving surfaces between curbs must be a minimum of28 feet in width when parking is allowed on one side of the roadway, and at least 36 feet in width when parking is permitted on both sides. FHOI FIRE HYDRANT W ATERMAIN PERMITS A separate permit is required for the installation of water mains and/or fire hydrants. Submit three (3) copies of drawings and specifications to DDES Building Services Division Permit Service Center for a permit application. Review and approval by Fire Engineering Section is required prior to installation. Plans shall include, but are not limited to; pipe sizes, pipe type, valves/fittings, thrust blocks and/or rodding and material listings. Fire hydrants shall be installed per K.C.C. Title 17 Water mains shall be installed and tested per A WW A standards and/or NFP A#24 (STANDARDS FOR PRIVATE FIRE HYDRANTS AND W ATERMAINS); as applicable. Ref. 1001.4 UFC NOTE: UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED, ANY W ATERMAIN OR FIRE HYDRANT DETAILS ON BUILDING PLANS/ORA WINGS HA VE NOT BEEN REVIEWED OR APPROVED. FH74 PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL Preliminary Fire Engineering approval has been granted based upon the following information provided. To obtain final Fire Engineering approval, the following item(s) must be submitted to the ODES permit service center; reviewed and approved: L Certificate of Water Availability. (Provided by appropriate water purveyor). Valid one year from date of signature. Minimum acceptance flow shall be I 000 gallons per minute at 20 pounds per square inch residual pressure. IL Three copies of plans indicating: Fire Systems Review Approval Conditions Page I of2 ., . . f ,. ' .. • • A. Fire hydrant(s) location -measured by vehicular travel distance. (K.C.C. Title 17) Residential 1. 700 ft. maximum spacing. 2. Not more than 350 ft. from each lot. B. Watermain placement (K.C.C. Title 17) 1. Source (i.e.) supply connection. 2. Main sizes identified. C. Fire access roads Ref. IFC, Sections 501 through 503, 2003 addition 1. Minimum 20 ft. wide unobstructed -13'6" vertical clearance, unobstructed. All-weather surface, able to withstand 25 tons. (See sprinkler note above) 2. Fire access roads in excess of 150 feet (dead-ends), must have an approved tum-around area. Access road shall extend to within 150 ft. of all portions of building exterior walls. Required tum-arounds must be a minimum 80-foot diameter; or meet approved "hammerhead" requirements **********Including temporary turnarounds***.********* 3. Fire access roads must provide 20-foot minimum inside turning radius and 40 outside turning radius when said roads change direction. 4. Fire access roads shall not exceed 15% grade. 5. The required width of any fire apparatus access road shall not be obstructed in any manner, including parking of vehicles. Minimum required widths and clearances established under this section shall be maintained at all times. D. Marking when required, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads and prohibit the obstruction thereof or both. Ref. IFC, Sections 501 through 503, 2003 edition FH77 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL Final plat approval requires an inspection and approval of the fire hydrant and water main installation by a King County Fire Inspector, prior to recording. Call [888)546-7728 to schedule an inspection; after a permit to install bas bee obntained from DDES; Fire Protection Engineering. Fire Systems Review Approval Conditions Page 2 of2 . -- CAM•WEsr· DcE V E LO P M E N T • ,'l~N C October 31, 2006 Karen Scharer,_PlaI_liler King County DOES 900 Oakesdale A venue SW Renton WA98055-1219 RE: Martin Property: L05P0019 . Preliminary Plat Resubmittal #3 Dear Karen, I. Drainage: Please address the following: • a. Off-Site Conveyance: The preliminary drainage plan proposes an offsite storm pipe through Lot 35 of the adjacent plat of Shamrock; Howev·er, the recorded plat of Shamrock does not show a public drainage easement to allow construction of the . proposed storm pipe. Please provide documents indicating that - a public drainage easement is available in a suitable location for ·. the offsite conveyance of stormwater. Since the propose1 detention pond on the Martin Property does not µave a suitable spillway location, the downstream conveyance system and ·easements must be located and d~signed to accommodate the I 00-year developed overflow from the pond. You have stated that-you either have or intend to submit for a drai~age variance form relief from the code requirements. Until such time that a variance is approved or information showing compliance with the above is provided, this application will continue to be on hold. Response: In April 2006 we submitted a storm drainage . . adjustment for Mark Bergam's review. The purpose of.the adjustment was to correct an error made to the lO~foot drainage easement with lot 35 of the Shamrock plat. The easement was intended to be a public drainage easement containing a buried conveyance pipe for the Martin property to tie into. However, the easement was not platted as a public easement on the recorded Shamrock Heights · plat_. Also, we requested relief from the 5-foot building setback requirement for lot 35. The storm-adjustment was y subsequently approved in late July. Additio!)ally, a pubUc t( I\( )q y -T - CAM•WEsr· • D 'EV Et: 0 P., MEN T" ,,~1 N'C I ·b. • drainage easement was recorded over lot 35. Enclosed are copie~ of the approved drainage adjustment and recor'1ed public drainage easement. The conveyance pipe contained within the easement has been constructed and is ready to receive drainage from the future Martin property once construction approval is obtained. · Preliminary Drainage Plan: The onsite features map in the · downstream analysis submitted with your plat application shown an existing pipe system, which is not depicted on the preliminary drainage plan. Please update the drainage plan to show any required revisions to the existing pipe system. Based upon the existing mapping, it appears that the existing storm pipes and catch basins near, the west property line are designed to collect drainage from the onsite ditches and depression, for uncontrolled discharge to Lots 36 and 3 7 in Shamrock. The updated drainage plan we are requesting for the Martin . application should identify preliminary designs for conveying · drainage to an appropriate outlet, with drainage eas~ments fpr conveyance of offsite flows. ' Again, a drainage variance relief from the code requirements is needed or some·other alternative. Until such time that a v~iance is approved or. inform<\tion showing compliance with · code is provided, this applicant will continue to hold. Response: We believe this issue was address in the last submittal as we deleted the. existing storm features from the plat map. These features are planned for removal as all storm generated from the Martin site will be. detained on site and eventually released from the pond through the . conveyance pipe on Shamrock lot 35. Our understanding is that no storm variance relief is needed as a result of this proposal since we will be detaining all drainage on site and will not need this existin'g system to ~emain. ·2: Please address the encroachments that are located on the panhandle of proposed lot 5 and what access/use agreements with the owner of Tax Lot I 023059355 there are for the continuation of access and use. Please note that through plat conditions, Lot 5 will be prohibited form accessing 1481!' /we SE directly via the 14-foot wide panhandle. Staff would encourage your consideration of negotiating with the other owner to see if he would be interested in having that property combined in his lot under a BLA. , -------------------- ------ ,CAM•WEsr·, • • '- "1,tD E~V E 1.;,0;P,.:M l:'.I NT •1'~1 N C Response: Triad & I met with the owner of tax lot: 1023059355, Safet Basic, to discuss the panhandle property which is currently attached to lot 5 and front 148 1h Avenue SE. Since we have no inten.tion of accessing lot 5 via this panhandle, we ni'et with Safet to discuss conveyance and to determine if he uses this panhandle property. Safet Basic does use the panhandle. His garage door·fronts the panhandle and it appears he has used this property for sometime. However, our conversation with Mr .. Basic immediately turned to the issue of storm drainage as he had experienced issues with flooding since the Shamrock plat improvements went in. Our engineer concluded that · the "storm socks" Iocate.d within the Shamrock catch basins along the 1481h Ave property frontage were full and most likely causing the flooding issues .to Mr. Basie's home. Since the Shamrock site . development construction is complete, we removed the socks in the catch basins. We have committed to Mr. Safet that we will assist him with any future drainage issues he ·may encounter as a result of Shamrock. Our feeling is the issue has been resolved. I will ask Mr. Safet to email a note to you to this effect. Our proposal for the panhandle is to tract the property out and convey the property to Mr. · Safet at final plat. Please let me ~ow if this proposal is acceptable and I will call you to discu.ss. · · · We look f~rward to proceeding with the revie"Y process and getting a hearing schedule soon. I can be reached at(425) 825-1955 should you need any additional information or have any further questions. Sincerely, Xltvit~ ·.J Sara Slatten Carn West Development, Inc. enclosures (® • King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 July 27, 2006 Sara Slatten Cam West 9720 NE I 20th Place, Suite I 00 Kirkland, WA 98034 • Rebecca Cushman, P .E. Triad Associates 12112-115th Avenue NE Kirkland, WA 98034 RE: Shamrock Heights Subdivision 1998 KCSWDM Adjustment Request (File No. L06V0043) Dear Applicant and Engineer: The Land Use Services Division, Engineering Review Section, has completed review of the adjustment request for the Shamrock Heights subdivision. You are requesting approval for an · adjustment from the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) Section 4.1, Route Design and Easement Requirements. Our review of the information and a site visit provides the following findings: I. The proposed Shamrock Heights subdivision is located in the 12600th block of 144th Place SE. The completed and constructed Shamrock Heights subdivision is filed under Land Use Services Division (LUSD) file number L02P0014. 2. The Shamrock Heights subdivision recorded a IO foot utility easement along the south property line of Lot #35 for the purpose of constructing a drainage conveyance pipe at the natural discharge location to benefit the proposed preliminary plat of the Martin Property, LUSD file number L05P0019. Releases from the Ma.'iin Plat's stormwater facility would enter a drainage pipe that would pass from east to west through Lot #35 and connect to a catch basin in the 144th Place SE right-of-way. These detained releases would be tributary to the Shamrock Heights drainage facility which is in the City of Renton. 3. The 10 foot utility easement, which requires no building setback line (BSBL), should have been labeled a drainage easement which would have required a 5 foot BSBL. The foundation of the home on Lot #35 was poured directly against the edge of the 10 foot utility easement (with no BSBL) before the error was discovered. 4. The intent of a BSBL from a drainage easement is to guarantee that a I: I vertical to horizontal influence line from the base of a building's foundation does not bear on the drainage pipe. For instance, if a pipe were centered in a IO foot easement, the Sh~ock ~eights/L,V0043 • July 27, 2006 Page 2 of2 foundation was placed against the easement and the bottom of the foundation footing was 3 feet deep, then the influence line would meet the center of the easement at a depth of 8 feet. 5. The applicant has provided a cross sectional view of the as-built location of Lot #35's foundation in relation to the property line and the foundation's line of influence. Based on the invert elevation of where the drainage pipe must connect to the catch . basin in the 144th Place SE right-of-way (the pipe's downstream end) and the fact that the pipe must be laid at positive grade, the applicant has shown that the pipe, when installed, will remain above the influence line of the foundation and therefore satisfy the intent of the BSBL requirement. Based on these findings, we hereby approve this adjustment to allow the elimination of the BSBL from the drainage easement given that the intent of the requirement will be satisfied when the drainage pipe is installed, with the following conditions: I. The drainage pipe must be installed in the center of the JO foot drainage easement. 2. In the portion of the corridor next to the foundation, the drainage pipe must be laid no deeper than 5 feet plus the depth of the existing foundation footing. 3. The easement corridor must remain unobstructed. 4. Notification to, and written acknowledgement from the City of Renton that the storm water facility of the Martin Plat will be connected to the drainage system tributary to a facility in the City's jurisdiction. If you have any further questions regarding this KCSWDM adjustment or the design requirements, please contact Mark Bergam at (206) 296-7270. James Sanders, P.E. Development Engineer Engineering Review Section Land Use Services Division ~ ct-..... - ~m Chan, P.E. Supervising Engineer Site Engineering and Planning Section Building Services Division cc: Curt Crawford, P.E., Managing Engineer, Stormwater Services Section, KCDNR Steve Van Patten, Engineer II, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Mark Bergam, P.E., Engineer III, Engineering Review Section, LUSD ®·· • King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 Project Name: Shamrock Heights Project Address: f'i ' '30S-ctt-l I 5 Applicant/Agent**: Phone: CamWesU Sara Slatten 425 825-1955 Signatu, Address: 9720 NE 120th Place, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT/DESIGN ENGINEER: • Web Date: 11/16/2005 .'sURi=AcE wATER DESIGN MANUAL , REQUIREMENTS/ STA.NbARDS ADJUSTMENT* REQUEST . For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. . DOES Project File No: L02P0014 Lof.t>VDOL/ ~ ODES Engineer/Planner Name: Mark Bergam En e ing Firm Name: Triad Associates Address: 12112115~AveNE Phone: 425 821-8448 City, Stale, ZIP: Kirkland, WA 98034 Please be sure to include all materials (Level One Downstream Analysis, Certification of Applicant Status, sketches, photos, and maps) that may assist in complete review and consideration of this adjustment request. Failure to provide all pertinent information may result in delayed processing or denial of request. Please submit two complete copies of this request, application form. and applicable fee to the Department of Development and Environmental Services, 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219. For more information, contact Mark Bergam, P.E., at 206-296-7270. **Applicant/Agent is the individual financially responsible for all fees h~;r;;·/REFERlil'.0;'.!:;;1-1il:P,;TERT1'ifSEeif10N~1·,:4\.0.fi/iil1HE1suR!fACE,WATEB'DEs1GNiMANUAW1;0R'ADJUsTMENTS;:;i~~':'.I DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT REQUEST: [8J Standard O Complex O Experimental O Blanket O Pre-application Waiver for required BSBL on a drainage easement. APPLICABLE VERSION KCSWDM: D 1990 (11/95)* [8] 1998 (9/98) D 2005 (1/05) *(Note: the term "variance" replaced by "adjustment") APPLICABLE SECTION($) OF STANDARDS: Section 4.1 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual 00 rn@rn~wrn~ APR 2 4 2006 ~ JUSTIFICATION PER KCSWDM SECTION 1.4.2: [8J See attachments listed below. Cover Letter; Exhibit, supporting calculations, Geotechnical Letter AUTHORIZATION SIGNATURES: K.C. D.D.E.S. D Denial DETERMINATION: D Approval ~onditional Approval (see below) D DNRP/WLRD Approval Signed: Date: --------(Experimental & Blanket only) ODES Staff Recommendation Signed-:--1+-cc-11c-,,,,_-H--~--: Date: ;, •1'/,"r..-0 b Conditions of Approval: D Review Supervisor: Date: Check out the DOES Web SurfWaterDesManReqStdsAdjReqFORM 4_20_06.doc le-info-surwa-adj.pdf & Planning Supervisor Date: at www.metrokc.gov/ddes 11/16/2005 Page 1 of 1 • April 20, 2006 Mark Bergam King County DOES 900 Oakesdale Ave MS IB Renton, WA 98055-1219 RE: Shamrock Heights Triad Job No. 01-159 King County Project # L02POO 14 Dear Mark: • 12112 llStt1AvenueNE Kirkli!nd. WA 98034-6923 425.821.8448 425.821.348\ fax 800.488.Q756 toll free www.triadassoc.com lo) [g@[g~Wrn[Q) ln) APR 2 4 2006 K.C. D.D.E.S. Please consider this request to approve an adjustment to waive the need for a BSBL on one side of a storm drainage easement. To assist in the review of this variance, please see the enclosed geotechnical Jetter; exhibit consisting of plan, profile and cross section views of the drainage easement on Lot# 35; supporting drainage calculations; and your email dated 3/26/06. We propose to construct a 12-inch drainage conveyance pipe within the ten foot easement showri on the recorded plat of Shamrock Heights Lot# 35. The easement is located parallel to the south property line from the eastern lot line to the east right-of-way line on 144 1 h Place SE. The purpose of the drainage easement is to provide future conveyance for the proposed Preliminary Plat of the Martin Property, File no. L05POOl 9. Adjustment Discussion: Shamrock Heights is vested under the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). Preliminary Plat Approval was granted May 12, 2004. Section 4.1 of the 1998 KCSWDM provides the requirements for easements and building setbacks for County maintained conveyance system. Typically, for pipes less than 36-inches, a ten Lo&;v ool.f 3 • Page 2 Mark Bergam King County ODES April 20, 2006 • foot easement with a 5 foot building set back (BSBL) is required. Per previous discussions, you have requested that we provide the following: A) As-built plan view showing the location of the recently constructed foundations, profile and cross section views. B) A geotechnical/structural analysis demonstrating stability of the proposed structure. C) Access for maintenance/ replacement remains unobstructed. The proposed adjustment requests that the BSBL on the north side of the easement be waived as a requirement. In support of our request to eliminate the BSBL on the north side of the easement we offer the following: A) As shown in the attached exhibit, the as-built locations of the foundations on Lots 35 & 36 have been obtained and lie outside of the easement line. In addition to the plan view, a cross section and profile are provided. The· cross section view shows a 1 V: 1 H line of influence from the base of the foundations to a convergence point in relation to the proposed pipe. The proposed 12- inch pipe is above the line of influence with the foundations. The profile provides an additional view to clarify the relationship of the pipe alignment to the foundation. B) Kurt Merriman from Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. has provided a supporting letter for the geotechnical analysis. C) A fence may be placed at the common lot line of Lots 35 and 36 but there will be no obstructions within the easement, therefore maintenance access will be available within the ten foot easement. The location of the proposed pipe is at the natural discharge point for the pending preliminary plat of the Martin Property (File #L05POO 19). The Martin Property project will be vested under the.2005 KCSWDM when the preliminary plat approval has been obtained. The proposed pipe system has been sized to convey the developed condition, un-detained I 00-year storm event to protect the downstream homes from flooding. In addition to the conveyance sizing, the proposed pond will be fitted with redundant overflow measures as required by the 2005 KCSWDM. These overflow measures will consist of a stand pipe for the primary overflow; a grated opening in the control structure manhole for the secondary inlet; and an emergency overflow structure with a birdcage grate as the redundant overflow provision. • ·Page 3 Mark Bergam King County DDES April 20, 2006 • Please review this request and the supporting material provided. If you require any further information for your consideration, please give me a call. Sincerely, ATES ushman, P.E. Project Engineer . RSC cc: Cam West -Sara Slatten enclosures: Adjustment Request Form Lot 35 Storm Drainage Easement Exhibit KCRTS reports for developed I-hr and 15-min peak flows KCBW reports for I 0-yr and I 00-yr events Email dated 3/16/06 \ \ .. · FOR ER' \ . I .I /1 I I I I I I 2" ~?,NDUIT b' HIGH MAR1ED "GAt LINE" 2" CONDUIT $' HIGH MARKED ";$ LINE" I I I I I \ \ '\ \ \ \ \ \ ""-., 35 "- ----- EXST FOUNDATION NO S~CTURE 3/7/06 "-. l ,/' ~ •.• , 1,1•i1 "-_,,-'~ , ', ~ Jl."Zl:.i FOUNDATION W/ 2-STORY WOOD STRUCTURE 3/7/06 12" SD PIPE PROPERTY LINE .118~.'Z. 36 ---c-· '"-.. fl Jj _J I I I I I \II \1 \ I\ 1\ \ I ,\ I \I lu \ ~ + i,~ • • • 450 __ bj ... ~ i!: ... ... -"' "' "' ""'! oi ... ... C, 440 ------ 1 TIO W ?Y OD "UR[ I ' -.- -------~ • ' i/ qi I I ', -.E:1"•ZII' \J;J ID) rn@g~Wrn[Q) lfu APR 2 4 2006 K.C. D.D.E.S. LOT 36 ·. ------------------------------. ------------- 40.29 ""' ~ ~ Cl) ~ ~ ~""' -~ ~ !!! ~~ Q Ill i ~ Cl) I<) ., ""' 0 .... TRIAD ASSOCIATBll 1:l11Z11lilhMl,J£ ~WA~ 425.821.8448 "25.&!13'11 la IOO.A.a.onllol--- ~ ti g ~1 ~ Piuitd willSciPI ildlli at ffllST SUBIOTTAI. DI.ti: SCAI.I: .... l"•tlO' fllf•l"•lll' ST.lllP HOT YWD UN\1SS SIGNED AND 11,lTID ,oa NO. 01-159 Sl!ffl NO. 1., 1 02006 TRl.0.0 ASS00ATES -------- .-----------------·---· ~ .,., , .. • • 1111111111 IIIIIIH 20060825000187 KING COUNTY RE iAS 0.00 PAGE001 OF 007 { 08/ZB/2006 09: 16 .. , •• ,. } / .;··>,:· f / ··.,,.· KING COUNTY, UA Pt,m riot or ··. infoiri\'itton WASHJN:. TON STA'r · RECORDER'S Cover Sheet (Rew 65.04J Document Title(s) (op·~s;ictio11iconia/ned th;\'ein)~'(rufM applicable to yo,;,document mwt be filled in) ~:. D~,v-,,~ t;M,Sf~/f....,'----------- Reference Number(s) of Docujnen!i; a~iguidJir relea.sedi: . ···: ... / :: . .-'.' •i .,/~ ) :: Additional reference #' s on page __ ~f d<i~um~ht / Grantor(~) '/L~~ name, first name, initiaI1) ·,\ .. 1. CAl&Ne:S (l)NS!B,llGI10~,u ,c.,, -~..c+---,C-.,;'----"'---"----",--"-2. .. . Additicirial n~~~ ~n pa~e __ of document. Gi:iinte. s) (l,Mt natrie first, then first name and initials) 1.~1 . . i-~---~-----,,....-----~---------~+-......,~-- . Additional nam~.s·~YJP•ge,·········\ o(document. Legal dcscripti~n (l!bbr',\'iate4! J:io. lot, blo~l<. plat or section, township, range) · un: oS OF $ltlw\12.l'Y'Jtd:t5J~ I N/4P(A16 7o TllF: f'J..A T tt£CDU£/J VfV~/1'<¥, ~l;:jZ... ~ (2/=U)W.:S~ /Utvei tl>lltJ7}', WA . . -. ·' •' .. ··, .. . . . _,,,• .. Additional legal is on page __ : of document. :: ·.:, ... ,~:. Assessor's Property Tax Pai'~l)l/Ac.~urit Nlimb.~r . d ·•,, ... ,.. . .. .. assigne :::r10820 D350 .. D Assessor Tax # not yet The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the informatiori -~t'O'\fided.6n the forin. ThC staff.will not read the document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing inf~tio.~· pro~Jded ~-Creir( ·· ·· I am requesting an emergency nonstandard recording for an.4ddifionid fee~ proyjded in RCW 36.18.010. I understand that the recording processing requtren:ienu.'ma)' cover ilp.or othet'.Wise. obscure.some part of the text of the original document. ·· · .,· ·· ,.. ·· · ·· ______________________ Signatore oflleqyestlngpa~ Pei I • • ·:. i ·:: After Recordfug retu~t{ ,/ ··,:,:,. ,/ .:· ;: ~:;:-. ., / .. -~· .,,,. ... King County Real Esta.te Sekices· 500 4th Avenue, Room SOil.A · Seattle, WA 98104 · ~·"·.,,. DRAINAGEEASt~NT / '·,.,···, .. I:6r a v;lllu~tif:l consideration, receipt of:,bicn'l:·~;ell $G~;l~d~ed,~y•bJmoR, •::,. • / ;i" Cai me~ Conku'ctio~; LLC, the owner( s) in fee of that certci~ piirce'lofl~d/des~rib~ as ::· ·' ,.; . ,. . .: •' follo(vs: / ;' .,· ':, .•. _,., .. . \,,. Lot 35 orShfunr9cfJ;leigjlts I according to the plat recorded under rec~fding number ......... ioosi 12?000044 r~cords of King County, Washington, ~ . . . hereby grant andconvey aiioh-eJ.Cci°~ye ilaseriient over that portion of Lot 35 legally described ··::,:, / .. ·: ···.,,".,:: .• ,: . in exhibit "A" and depicted on i\icl:µbit "B"both of_whl9h are attached hereto and incorporated ·: ., .... ·.-. .. .. .. ,. herein, to King County, a politi~ syJ,aiyisioii of the St~t/~f\ya,shington, (GRANTEE) for the .. ,,.,,,.. .:· :: .:· _::· :: .i,,· ·· .. purpose of conveying, storing, maruiging·ilnd fa¢ilitl\ting &torm iµld sµrface water per an ·. ... ,, ,• ,, ;, ··. engineering plan approved b~ l<u;g C~Uilty f6r # proJec,:ts kil.own as: .. -·: ' ..... Shamrock Heights I: King County File No: L02POOi4 arid f6r th~ evennbtb~nefi; 6fthe Martin .. , .. ' :. .. •; ., ,. Property, King County File No: LOSPOOl 9, together with. the righ~ for 'Klng[G6unfy .~o :· .:·.. .. .. ·.,... .;:' .:· .:·.,,·· ··.-.. reasonably ingress and egress to enter said drainage easement for' th~ plitpose\if_.inspecting, i p~ 1 . ·=,:,,,,,,,,., .. -· • • '"",,;, '\e ... ,~ :? .;:,'.',. .. operating, ffi$taining;i~epiiirin{i6 i~pfu;irig .;~ drainage facilities contained herein. In the .... ;,:.. / _,· {' ·.-: ) ·''·· ·· .. event the Grantee'· perfo.ims _Jmy y;/ork_::fof 1;1ie ~iisement area, Shamrock Heights Homeowners Association shall repla~e;•'~t its cqs( ¢ly J~ds~~i~~: or otl_l' "}mprovements damaged or ·' :. •' destroyed as a result of such actlvitjes that lqng Cqtfutydo~ npltepair or replace. . ' ''.· ( The GRAJffO~ of said parcel is requ;;~ tiobkii~ptjor, l«~: i;;~;;;i"fyom 1?~ \tater and Land R~ources bivision of the King Co~fy "D~;~i;it of'R;tudi n"es9fuce{ prior to ,I' ,,, •' -i: • ' ,• / ,, perfoqfilng.~y, alt~rations or modifications to the drainage fu.ci!ities /(uriderground pipe) •' •'• . ,, .. con~inecj(vithiri saj8 drainage easement. · · :.: .. Tb.is-~ase!'rieri{i:·:;~ii!led to facilitate reasonable access to th~-~nl!/ie facilities. It is binding upon.tli; GRAN;6R, its hi)~, successors and assigns. .._.. •:·,·,•.,,.~····· ::,· _,:: ./ ;. .,,' ··,·,:. GRANTOR ASSOCIATION SHAMROCK,I1EIGHT$ HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION By: . . .. . . .. .. • ·-~ STATE OF WASIID(GTdN }/ . COUNTY OF KlNG .. .Jss. :/ • On this day personal( apPeart\d ~efor¢ ~Ji( .. .; Andy Caimes, known to me to be' the)nru.i~ger o{Cairiie~ Cdns~ction, LLC, described in and who executed the within and foregoing in~erit m:id acknowliifge.d·ffiath,:: signed .~le same as the free ang ~&b./ntary act and deed of said party for the '115ell ~m;l'purpqses,thcie.in s~t~d/ 9i~e~,~~~~P.1Y hand and official seal~~· ~~~/of~F~f // .! , 2006. ) ~--dforthe State of Washington, residing at IL,tt:f./rWD. wA .. .r ' .,., .. .,.~-·· ' ! :: My Commission Expires: 2 -.2S:-Oi • • ,,,, •. ,. ''• ,•"'•.// STATE OF WA.SIDNl)l'QN) / ' COUNTY OF KINo··· .. )gs. On this day pers6najly appeared bt:for~. fu~:/ .. ' i Eric H. Campbell, known to rile. tb b.l th.ti fresi\i,;;( of the.tSb;iinrock Heights Homeowners Association, described in and whc{. eicecllted/the Wifuin. aµcl foregoing instrument and acknowledge~ that he signed the same as the (ree ~4 volunFitry ~ct.:m,:i"Jeed.of said party for the -~~:.~;= om,;w ,om ~;~i~;j~'.~:~)// , 2006. ,, ~~~f~ili, :; W ~ ington, residing at k.1t¥,.t.A:tJ D 1 \ ,)A 'My Commission Expires: :;-:-q5-0B p~ s ·,, ... ,,.,, . .;.,···· ,',;.; 't>. ~ .,· .J,:" i ·:''"i· i o·w • ~T-44'34·w .: J -,, Sa ·. ,} 1.5,64-0± .. SQ. fr. 4.0J I 266.94-·. 'f'C:i (o • . ' :.,,,:,,·1··· ;~11t.' . ·•:.::,"" :·:, ,,_: i • • • ,.,·. ::.;_·:.:.,.,·.,a' .. j"a,y,.,' .// EXHIBITA• ~;1tf ;~{,::::>:t~:Jg.iiTe1ii1-····.:... . .... , '' ',} /: / J ,·· ) : ·~?y,:\'~ °-'tNAGE El\~EMENT . TRIAD JOB# 01-159 AUGUST 11, 2006 '._.: :· THESOUTHcjO;OOf'~ETOF LOi,'35, SHAMROCKHE1$HTS1 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT .·THEREOF RECORDED UNDER RJ<CORDING)iUMBE,R 20051122000044, RECORDS OF KING · · .\ COUNJY{\i.vAs·~.rNfTeiN. /. / · . .,// .(''"' .:.r ..... > · '.! •. •: .• WRITTEN BY: AfJ; · 'CHECKEl:lBY: 'NAY j'". ~, . -"':"""---:-·--· p(q 1 . ·-... -.. -~---·-· -.; .~ ..... ··-------"' .. ··-··-·-." .----.-----....... ........ ,.,~_ .. ,.,. .. ~~ -~· ~~~.~~-~~·-· ' ,_. ~- Scharer;-Karen • Page 1 of 1 ------------------------------------------ From: . Sent: To: Sara Slatten [sslatten@camwest.com] Tuesday, October 31, 2006 4:28 PM Scharer, Karen Subject: Martin Property: Resubmittal #3 Attachments: SD0C4204.pdf; SD0C4203.pdf; SD0C4205.pdf Karen, Attached are our responses to the outstanding items for the Martin property plat, the approved storm variance for the Shamrock storm easement, and recorded public storm easement we're planning to tie into. I will try contacting you soon to discuss further. Thanks, Sara Slatten CamWest Development (425) 825-1955; phone {425) 825-1565; fax www.camwest.com «SD0C4204.pdf» «SD0C4203.pdf» «SD0C4205.pdf» 10/31/2006 • • October 31, 2006 Karen Scharer, Planner King County DDES 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton WA98055-1219 RE: Martin Property: LOSP0019 Preliminary Plat Resubmittal #3 Dear Karen, 1. Drainage: Please address the following: a. Off-Site Conveyance: The preliminary drainage plan proposes an offsite storm pipe through Lot 35 of the adjacent plat of Shamrock; However, the recorded plat of Shamrock does not show a public drainage easement to allow construction of the proposed storm pipe. Please provide documents indicating that a public drainage easement is available in a suitable locat_ion for ti)e offsite·conveyance of stormwater. Since the proposed .. detention pond on the Martin Property does not have a suitable· spillway location, the downstream conveyance system and easements must be located and designed to accommodate the 100-year developed overflow from the pond:. You have stated that you either have or intend to submit for a . . . drainage variance form relief from the code requirements. Until such time that a variance is approved or information showing compliance with the above is provided, this application will continue to be on hold. Response: In April 2006 we submitted a storm drainage adjustment for Mark Bergam's review. The purpose of.the adjustment was to correct an error made to the 10-foot drainage easement with lot 35 of the Shamrock plat. The easement was intended to be a public drainage easement containing a buried conveyance pipe for the Martin property to tie into. However, the easement was not platted as a public easement on the recorded Shamrock Heights plat. Also, we requested relief from the 5-foot building setback requirement for lot 35. The storm adjustment ·was subsequently approved in late .July. Additionally, a public I Y....., "':".'ell • • drainage easement was recorded over lot 35. Enclosed arc copies of the approved drainage ·adjustment and recorded public drainage easement. The conveyance pipe contained within the easement has been constructed and is ready to receive drainage from the future Martin property once construction approval is obtained. · · b. Preliminary Drainage Plan: The onsi1:e features map in the · downstream analysis submitted with your plat application shown an existing pipe system, which is not depicted on the preliminary drainage plan. Please update the drainage plan to show aiiy required revisions to the existing pipe system. Based upon the existing mapping, it appears that the existing storm . pipes and catch basins near-the west property line are designed to collect drainage from the onsite ditches and depression, for uncontrolled discharge to Lots 36 and 37 in Shamrock. The updated drainage plan we are requesting for the Martin application should identify preliminary designs for conveying drainage to an appropriate outlet, with drainage easements for conveyance of offsite flows. ' Agai11, a drainage variance relief from the code requirements is needed or some other alternative. Until such time that a variance is approved or information showing compliance with code is provided, this applicant will continue to hold. Response: We believe this issue was address in the last submittal as we deleted the existing storm features from the plat map. These features are planned for removal as all storm generated from the Martin site will be detained on site and eventually released from .the pond through the . conveyance pipe on Shamrock lot 35. Our understanding is that no storm variance relief is needed as a result of this proposal since we will be detaining all drainage on site and will not need this existing system to remain. 2. Please address the encroachments that are located on the panhandle of proposed lot 5 and what access/use agreements with the owner of Tax Lot 1023059355 there are for the continuation of access and use. Please note that through plat conditions, Lot 5 will be prohibited form accessing J 48'h Ave SE directly via the 14-foot wide panhandle. Staff would encourage your consideration of negotiating with the other owner to see if he would be interested in having that property combined in his lot under a BLA. • • Response: Triad & I met with the owner of tax lot: 1023059355, Safet Basic, to discuss the panhandle property which is currently attached to lot 5 and front 1481b Avenue SE. Since we have no intention of accessing lot 5 via this panhandle, we met with Safet to discuss conveyance and to determine if he uses this panhandle property. Safet Basic does use the panhandle. His garage door fronts the panhandle and it appears he has used this property for sometime. However, our conversation with Mr. Basic immediately turned to the issue of storm drainage as he had experienced issues with flooding since the Shamrock plat improvements went in. Our engineer concluded that the "storm socks" locate.d within the Shamrock catch basins along the 1481b Ave property frontage were full and most likely causing the flooding issues to Mr. Basie's home. Since the Shamrock site development construction is complete, we removed the socks in the catch basins. We have committed to Mr. Safet that we will assist him with any future drainage issues he may encounter as a result of Shamrock. Our feeling is the issue has been resolved. I will ask Mr. Safet to email a note to you to this effect. Our proposal for the panhandle is to tract the property out and convey the property to Mr. · Safet at fmal plat •. Please let me know if this proposal is acceptable and I will call you to discu.ss. · · We look forward to proceeding with the review process and getting a hearing schedule soon. I can be reached at ( 425) 825-1955 should you need any additional information or have any further questions. Sincerely, . , .. >< r /} J-1-.,..:· . . '<f v1{!\ ~)u~ U)-.J \,/ ·-Sara Slatten Carn West Development, Inc. enclosures i • ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton. WA 98055-1219 July 27, 2006 Sara Slatten Cam West 9720 NE l 20u, Place, Suite I 00 Kirkland, WA 98034 • Rebecca Cushman, P .E. Triad Associates 12112-l 15u, Avenue NE Kirkland, WA 98034 RE: Shamrock Heights Subdivision 1998 KCSWDM Adjustment Request (File No. L06V0043) Dear Applicant and Engineer: The Land Use Services Division, Engineering Review Section, has completed review of the adjustment request for the Shamrock Heights subdivision. You are requesting approval for an adjustment from the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) Section 4.1, Route Design and Easement Requirements. Our review of the information and a site visit provides the following findings: I. The proposed Shamrock Heights subdivision is located in the 12600u, block of 144th Place SE. The completed and constructed Shamrock Heights subdivision is filed under Land Use Services Division (LUSD) file number L02P0014. 2. The Shamrock Heights subdivision recorded a IO foot utility easement along the south property line of Lot #35 for the purpose of constructing a drainage conveyance pipe at the natural discharge location to benefit the proposed preliminary plat of the Martin Property, LUSD file number LOSP0019. Releases from the Martin Plat's stormwater facility would enter a drainage pipe that would pass from east to west through Lot #35 and connect to a catch basin in the 144u, Place SE right-of-way. These detained releases would be tributary to the Shamrock Heights drainage facility which is in the City of Renton. 3. The 10 foot utility easement, which requires no building setback line (BSBL), should have been labeled a drainage easement which would have required a 5 foot BSBL. The foundation of the home on Lot #35 was poured directly against the edge of the 10 foot utility easement (with no BSBL) before the error was discovered. 4. The intent of a BSBL from a drainage easement is to guarantee that a 1: I vertical to horizontal influence line from the base ofa building's foundation does not bear on the drainage pipe. For instance, if a pipe were centered in a IO foot easement, the • Shamrock Heights/L06V0043 July 27, 2006 Page 2 of2 0 foundation was placed against the easement and the bottom of the foundation footing was 3 feet deep, then the influence line would meet the center of the easenient at a depth of 8 feet. 5. The applicant has provided a cross sectional view of the as-built location of Lot #35's foundation in relation to the property line and the foundation's line of influence. Based on the invert elevation of where the drainage pipe must connect to the catch basin in the 1441h Place SE right-of-way (the pipe's downstream end) and the fact that the pipe must be laid at positive grade, the applicant has shown that the pipe, when installed, will remain above the influence line of the foundation and therefore satisfy the intent of the BSBL requirement. Based on these findings, we hereby approve this adjustment to allow the elimination of the BSBL from the drainage easement given that the intent of the requirement will be satisfied when the drainage pipe is installed, with the following conditions: I. The drainage pipe must be installed in the center of the 10 foot drainage easement. 2. In the portion of the corridor next to the foundation, the drainage pipe must be laid no deeper than 5 feet plus the depth of the existing foundation footing. 3. The easement corridor must remain unobstructed. 4. Notification to, and written acknowledgement from the City of Renton that the stonnwater facility of the Martin Plat will be connected to the drainage system tributary to a facility in the City's jurisdiction .. If you have any further questions regarding this KCSWDM adjustment or the design requirements, please contact Mark Bergam at (206) 296-7270. James Sanders, P.E. Development Engineer Engineering Review Section Land Use Services Division pfc? Jim Chan, P.E. Supervising Engineer Site Engineering and Planning Section Building Services Di vision cc: Curt Crawford, P.E., Managing Engineer, Stonnwater Services Section, KCDNR Steve Van Patten, Engineer II, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Mark Bergam, P .E., Engineer III, Engineering Review Section, LUSD • Web Date: 11/16/2005 ® King County SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL REQUIREMENTS/ STANDARDS . ADJUSTMENT*REQUEST Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Project Name: DDES Project File No: L02P0014 LotoVOOL/ ?:> Shamrock Heights ODES Engineer/Planner Name: Mark Bergam Project Address: Design Engineer: Phone: fr' ~OS-'lt-l J 5 Triad Associates/ Rebecca Cushman 425 821-8448 ApplicanVAgent": Phone: eslgn Engineer: CamWesU Sara Slatten 425 825-1955 Signatu, Address: Address: City, State, ZIP: 9720 NE 120th Place, Suile 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 12112 115• Ave NE Kirkland, WA 98034 INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT/DESIGN ENGINEER: Please be sure to include all materials (Level One Downstream Analysis, Certification of Applicant Status, sketches, photos, and maps) that may assist in complete review and consideration of this adjustment request. Failure to provide all pertinent information may result in delayed processing or denial of request. Please submit two complete copies of this request, application form, and applicable fee to the Department of Development and Environmental Services, 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219. For more infomnation, contact Mark Bergam, P.E., at 206-296-7270. ••Appllcant/Agent Is the individual financially responsible for all fees DESCRIPTION. OF ADJUSTMENT REQUEST: 1:81 Standard O Complex O Experimental O Blanket D Pre-application Waiver for required BSBL on a drainage easement. APPLICABLE VERSION KCSWDM: D 1990 (11195)* [8J 1998 (9/98) D 2005 (1105) ·(Note: the tenn "variance" replaced by "adjustment') APPLICABLE SECTION($) OF STANDARDS: Section 4.1 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual . JUSTIFICATION PER KCSWDM SECTION 1.4.2: l2J See attachments listed below. Cover Letter, Exhibit, supporting calculations, Geotechnical Letter AUTHORIZATION SIGNATURES: D Denial mJ@©@~W@fo' APR 2 ~ 2006 L!:V K.C. D.D.E.S. DETERMINATION: D Approval ~onditional Approval (see below) D DNRPIWLRD Approval Signed: ---fl-;..-/J.7/',9--~ Date: --------(Experimental & Blanket only) ODES Staff Recommendation Signed: Date: :j1 .,z;?~CJ t:, Conditions of Approval: ODES DIRECTOR/ DESIGNEE: D Date: Check out the DDES Web SurfWaterDesManReqStdsAdjReqFORM 4_20_06.doc te-Jnfo:surwa-adj.pdf 11/16/2005 Date: Page 1 of 1 • April 20, 2006 Mark Bergam King County ODES 900 Oakesdale Ave MS 1B Renton, WA 98055-1219 RE: Shamrock Heights Triad Job No. 01-159 King County Project # L02POO 14 Dear Mark: 1]112 llStl)iwenueNE r.,rkl.111a. WA 98034-6923 425.821.8448 ,12~8213481 ra11 P.00408 U7':i6 to:1 free s\'V,·W 1r1,11:i.a,~oc com ID) @:@@:~Wm@ l.fu APR 2 4 2006 K.C. D.D.E.S. Please consider this request to approve an adjustment to waive the need for a BSBL on one side of a storm drainage easement. To assist in the review of this variance, please see the enclosed geotechnical letter; exhibit consisting of plan, profile and cross section views of the drainage easement on Lot# 35; supporting drainage calculations; and your email dated 3/26/06. We propose to construct a 12-inch drainage conveyance pipe within the ten foot easement shown on the recorded plat of Shamrock Heights Lot# 35. The easement is located parallel to the south property line from the eastern lot line to the east right-of-way line on J 44th Place SE. The purpose of the drainage easement is to provide future conveyance for the proposed Preliminary Plat of the Martin Property, File no. LOSPOOl 9. Adjustment Discussion: Shamrock Heights is vested under the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). Preliminary Plat Approval was granted May 12, 2004. Section 4.1 of the 1998 KCSWDM provides the requirements for easements and building setbacks for County maintained conveyance system. Typically, for pipes less than 36-inches, a ten Lot.ov ool/-3 Land Davelo ment Consultnnts Page 2 Mark Bergam King County ODES April 20, 2006 • • foot easement with a 5 foot building set back (BSBL) is required. Per previous discussions, you have requested that we provide the following: A) As-built plan view showing the location of the recently constructed foundations, profile and cross section views. B) A geotechnical/structural analysis demonstrating stability of the proposed structure. C) Access for maintenance/ replacement remains unobstructed. The proposed adjustment requests that the BSBL on the north side of the easement be waived as a requirement. In support of our request to eliminate the BSBL on the north side of the easement we offer the following: A) As shown in the attached exhibit, the as-built locations of the foundations on Lots 35 & 36 have been obtained and lie outside of the easement line. In addition to the plan view, a cross section and profile are provided. The cross section view shows a lV:lH line·ofintluence from the base of the foundations to a convergence point in relation to the proposed pipe. The proposed 12- inch pipe is above the line of influence with the foundations. The profile provides an additional view to clarify the relationship of the pipe alignment to the foundation. B) Kurt Merriman from Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. has provided a supporting letter for the geoteclmical analysis. C) A fence may be placed at the common lot line of Lots 35 and 36 but there will be no obstructions within the easement, therefore maintenance access will be available within the ten foot easement. The location of the proposed pipe is at the natural discharge point for the pending preliminary plat of the Martin Property (File #L05POO 19). The Martin Property project will be vested under the 2005 KCSWDM when the preliminary plat approval has been obtained. The proposed pipe system has been sized to convey the developed condition, un-detained 100-year storm event to protect the downstream homes from flooding. In addition to the conveyance sizing, the proposed pond will be fitted with redundant overflow measures as required by the 2005 KCSWDM. These overflow measures will consist of a stand pipe for the primary overflow; a grated opening in the control structure manhole for the secondary inlet; and an emergency overflow structure with a birdcage grate as the redundant overflow provision. ·Page 3 Mark Bergam King County ODES April 20, 2006 • • Please review this request and the supporting material provided. ff you require any further information for your consideration, please give me a call. Sincerely, I , r ____ .]'RIA~D A>'f'O, A TES f<:(iJfas.~· Project Engineer . RSC cc: Cam West -Sara Slatten enclosures: Adjustment Request Form Lot 35 Storm Drainage Easement Exhibit KCRTS reports for developed I-hr and 15-min peak flows KCBW reports for I 0-yr and I 00-yr events Email dated 3/16/06 \ N -·.1 ! ,__-! , I \ .. FOR ER' ' ·" I ··' I 1 I I MAR1ED "GA LINE" 2" C(JNDUIT r HIGH ' . / /__ / 2" CONDUIT i' HIGH MARKED "Gf$ LINE" ' I I / I / \ ' \ '\'- \. ' \ \ \ '-,, 35 "-, EXST._fOUNDATION NO STRUCTURE 3/7/06 -- I ., ,1 l ,:pi;-' ·,'-", j / ~ "" -/\~' / ~1~ll.i FOUNDATION W/ 2-STORY WOOD STRUCTURE 3/7 /06 12" SD PIPE PROPERTY LINE ,11-~i 36 ,---.. ----_j \ i l \ I I ,·-·+ "" ~- I .'\ I ' I ' ' I \I I\ ' ' ' I I I \1 Lu ' .._ .._ ,. ~ • • l i i ' l • n ,, 11 i~ _, ,, ., ii li • • I ' -------J-+-i/ l]l JUN r- ! 440i· -·--- ! I I I I !'-·-···--·-··"'" '8L E: /STING , 0 R PIP ~ ----.-.-' ' fo)~:C~rn~W§[g) l_ru APR 2 4 2006 K.C. D.D.E.S. " ; I LOT 36 ~ h····-····-··-·-·--·--····-···-·····-······-- ~0.29 LCXoVoa4,3 ... :;,: j IJ.j 0) ;:i ~ ~ ... ~ --'<t !!! ~~ :::i; liJ ~ 0) I() <') ... 0 .... TRIAD ASIOCIATUS 11112 1161>"'-.NE ---~215.811.6448 ~-..we1• toOMIJ77'NIOI ... -- ... ~ 0) ~ I ::e t3 i 0) I:~ 'SMlNmi- ~m"''l'r.-, -- R l,R'" fibJititJJi2ciJil1Ii.'iiffll'I" fUIST SUlllll'ITAL 1).1.n, SCA.LI: -., , •• 20" rm,, •• ,. , .... 01-159 ""' "'· 1,.1 QWClll lRW) AU00,.1'[$ ------ I j I l { I l .{ ' ! I l I I ! I i i I I ·l I r • • , _/11!¥!~~~~ . Tl I I~ If f 1111111111 ,· ; ·' !· , ,.,/···· ...... / 20060825000187 <' .. ,,., ..• / KING COUNTY RE BAS 0, 00 / · ?AGE00! OF 007 ,, 08/ZS/2006 09: 16 •., ,:· •• ._. .I' •• ~,. ··' •', .f I ;.,·,' KlNG COUNTY I IJA Pl,,., .~:;~, .. L 1.,;;,\';~ •• WASIIING{6N STA:1':i'rutcoRDER'S Covet Sheet (Rew 65.041 Document Tit!~(s) (~p'fran~ctio~i'°corihiinod th~/•iJiftaU'arcas applicable to yo.;..document mu<I be filled fa) ~:. D2A-Jhl;;Ee ,~et1t1~'-£ )' .......... . Reference N um bcr(s) of DocuJiienl~ a~sign.ed ,iir reJea.sedlo . '·\ .. ,,/ ./· / ..... / .,/·· ,'.: .~ .. Additional reference #'s on page __ of d~~t ;\· ·:,,;; ·:=::f Grantor(~) ··(L~t name, first name, ini1!;l) \.. 1. (.AJ~·Nt=:.-S'(DNSW,llDTJo , u .C,. 2. . ~iiJ'~~~~ ~~-'i;,!!.~~,'hcn first name and ln!tials) 'i )' . .-•'" I · ;ddiyonal nam,:;s'6tf~age_.,/"\ otdocument. ·::, •• , •.• _ ,.,·'' •' ,>' .. ;· • • Additional legal is on page__;;. of d~cumcnl :; ',: ....... ~: .. Assessor's Property Tax Par~~!/ Ai;c'6ujit N.Jlmbir . d .,,,,.~····· .. :: .:· .::,,·· asstgne 11082Q Q3SO .,· \,)' ·····\\• .. .~ .. ,,,,, ' ' •""· -~· ·: r -........ -7 D Assessor Tax# not yet The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the infnnnatiori·prOvlded.On the fop'n. TJfc stiµ'!.,~ill not read the document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing infO~tiop:· provlded h'erein·: !! ·· . .: .,· :: _;· ,:: .,, ......... ,,,. I am requesting an emergency nonstandard recording'for an,add\t1on~l fe!i ~ proyjded'm RCW 36.18.0l 0. I understand that the recording processing requfrf:ll)entsfoay'ciiver iip.9r otheriivise obscure-some part of the text of the original document. ·.. · · " ,/"·,,, ... :.: ..... ,,,,(_./ ' ------------,------------Signattire 0¥iliicn1e~tingP~rty r ei ' exc1sE TAX ~~r'J:lii~u;J ,.l Bycr~~v~p~;' . • • f~;t ;: ,,,·••:/ ;· .':" s ,,········'"'~,, . ::· ,1: ,...... ·.;- } ./ />../ ,,•"'·,·,,' .. ,/ ... ,' .. /':,,:.',•.· .. ./' .•: ,./: .. /'.,/' After Recordii\g retuni,to: _,.' ., '"-,. ••·· / King County ~:;~:tat,sei:ce/ 500 4th Avenue, Room··s~gA · Seattle, WA 98104 .... "' DRAINA~iixsi<J~.rfr/<' <::,./'':,:'·,,\ / F,:-6~ a yalu~bi~ consideration, receipt of;hlcn'' Jre~\l~~~;1eaifea.A1u,·'t,~TOR, CaimesCon~~tion~ LLC, the owner{s) in fee of that c~~ pkce{~;limd/~(1$b~ib' as ./ t .: ·: .,, .:· r :/ folJ!)'ws: / r /"""··· ....... (,/,.. ,,.·,•'.· .,.,, .. -·· \,. Lot 35 of.,Shamroek'Heights I according to the plat recorded under rec~f[!ing number ,. •, .,,-. .: .,..,... 2005f12tbo0044·;~eords of King County, Washington. hereby grant anci\:o~:~~ a,ii~h-e;-c'iu~ye iaseriient over that portion of Lot 35 legally described •'.::,:,,,,.,._., .. / :: / ··:: . .;; / ,: in exhibit "A" and depicte({(on ~bit "B":both· of ihlch are attached hereto and incorporated •' .. , ........... ; :: ,, ·' ,\ ,:-· .. . herein, to King County, a poi\tical Sllbclivision oftbe State of\V:ashington, (GRANTEE) for the ,,, .. .,, .. ,·· ... :: .:"-' .:· .:· .:,;,.,· ·· .... purpose of conveying, storing, mani;ging\nd fa¢ilitating,&tonn ~nd· sµrface water per an ·.. .... ,, ,. ;: :. •·. engineering plan approved by 'Kii;'g c'~u,nty ~r tl),g prPJ¥s la).own as: Shamrock Heights I: King County File No: LO~;od;4 aha f& th~ ev~n~b~~~~t 6f the Martin Property. King County File No: LOSP0019, toge~er \...itii th~ rj~; fqr,)cing]c;c\~j;y-~o reasonabfy ingress and egress to enter said drainage easemen/to/~~ pt~;~:-o{kp~~;ng: p~ l . ''"" • • ·:~;,, •,,,,.,. -~···. . ,..,..,:" .l ;, •)," . •: ,.,···•.;i· / ( :::-..,. .,,······ ·;- :: ''.:, ... :."' / .,· ·· ... ;/./',:.;/ ,,.-·,.~/ ,i/<.) operating, nuiiµtaining./repairi~ 'iii@ impfqvirig,.!lfe drainage facilities contained herein. In the ··,,,:",,,,..,1•'' •. / / / 1l /·'=:·,;:, ,. event the Grantee perf()rins imy iork/fn,· t;he ~llsement area, Shamrock Heights Homeowners . '\. _,_..: ./ ,/ ... r ./ ....... ,,,.___ :."'···:-. Association shall replace;/at iis cqst, ¢iy JB!)dscapink, ... or otl;ii:r )mprovements damaged or /' ./ ....... ..:"' / ,,,,;:,. \: '•)'::: .• /··· destroyed as a result of such actlvi.tjes that I<ing CciWJ.ty.do~ npft~air or replace. / } •: .e' . { The GRANi'OR of said parcel is requ;;~ tJ.obliiili'pi:jor,Lu(4;~;::1from tht'Water and .•• ··== ·\. ·.:-.\:;. ,,..... ./ ._.r .•.. ,,,.,. '·\: \\ _,/ .,/ . Land Rs&,urces Division of the King County'"Depa.ftm~t .,.of"N'aturii.I ~sQfu:~s prior to perfo[Jhlng/C;. a1t~rations or modifications to the dhiinake 4.iiutes/~,1~er6-ound pipe) :'" ,· .. con~ine<i'(,..ithih sajd drainage easement. ·, ....... / ' · ' f~s ~~e)li~t\~--:~e~ed to facilitate reasonable access to th~.:~~gge facilities. It is bi~ding upon~;ci~6RJts i\~ir.;, successors and assigns. . . . ,,,,,,.~,··· .:· _,. .,/· .:· ,,,... . ..... ·GRANTOR ,../ ,tairir~s'CoJl:n!ctio.n, LLC ./ (~!fj-o;:;;o~ ·:·,:, .... / ASSOCIATION SHAMROCK-1*:IGl'l.'I:iHpMF;bw.N,ER; i\\SSOCIATION By: .,.. .. . ....... ., -ti<--+-~--_;_.,/' { " '\, . . , / ·-,,j; • •,,,.,.,,, =-. ... , .• ,··' ... . ,,,· • , 2006. ,<My __ Commission Expires: 2 :--1S:-Q'? ·:\:: "" .f·.,.f • • . , .. -···· "My,Commission Expires: ;)-:-;25-oB ''"•· .,,, ...• ,· ·· .. , .. ,·<7 pc. s /' :: .t,,/ • • / ·;, ,. .,·· •'; ·\~ .. :,, ... .;.·······' .. ,,._ .. ,··· .,,l /h:/ .,· t·~r~tZ'. 1.iti: ;;, 2; · .. , .. ,., .. ,_,., ... , ,. .!jl'k\MgQ\i:KH.El(Jt;TS .L. ..• -· . ':"""' ·.,.•. · 'LEGAli'DESCRIP.TION'·· _. • EXHIBIT A • . TRIAD JOB# 01-159 AUGUST 11, 2006 . ;:_:_;:.!.f'_,: .. :_.· .•. :.·_:,_:_':."_ .•. :'_:_~: . : J, , . . ,: , .. : '/'' ... : · (L?>l·J5 D~tNAGE EA~EMENT ~ : : ;' : f. ~: ' '. \ ;: i . ..,··•·J . .... : . . .·,:;,!· .. . TH~),OUTtjJo;po F,EET ,OF L(;)T-.35, SHAf¥1RO\)K HE1$HTS I ACCORDING TO THE PLAT . THEREOF. .. ~EQORDED ,i,JNDER RJ:CORDJN,G }IUMBE',R 20~51122000044, RECORDS OF KING ;_}.·_\.i._-.:._•.: .. '·.... . ?OUN.Tf?1iA~)i,1Ng"TtlN. / , · i;/ /'• ' / < '1. ·.1. •, •' !, ··.\ .. ;,,, ',,.,,·. ,;'· } :.i ~y :: wFinte',tav: AwG"· .... / •(:i:}; .. · C~ECKE~!jY: 'Nt'.f i' · / ... ~ .. ) .. ·,.~... . . -1~t(j.)_:1.': . '\ -: III t?}tJir (\;?":'':. i{11;r-t . i:f::,):(~ /?i;, bi, "· ,,.. .r .i,,-·. \1,,;!,,,.;_~<,::· ·• '!< /i)_=:-{, ·,·_., ., , ...... , ... '· . / \·. ,/ ,''<>"'' :;~ "' .,, .,•. ·' ... ,,, · .. , .. ,,,';.::: ·-~-~-.: ' ·. . --;..;~:-.. ::··· .,/ / . -+---+-::.;··-·::---+,---.. --- ., ... --·· .,,.·,:· P(q 1 ·-:·.>~ .. . -...... ,'.·" ·-~-·~·-·-·· ·. +~·· ·~----·---.. _.~-----· .--.--.·--· .... .:·:,,, .. , ... ,,, ... ,~ ... ,/ ··-:-!:.,/ ,:.,./' ,;··,·.,·. Scharer, Karen From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: ~~ ~ 5DOC4206.pdf (112 KB) Karen, • Sara Slatten [sslatten@camwest.com] Tuesday, October 31, 2006 4:41 PM Scharer, Karen Proposed plat language for panhandle lot SDOC4206.pdf • Attached is the tract language I'm proposing for the panhandle property. This language was recorded for our Shamrock Heights final plat. My preference is to convey the panhandle property in a similar fashion. Please let me know what you find out. Thanks, Sara -----Original Message----- From: Sara Slatten [mailto:sslatten@camwest.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 2:34 PM To: Sara Slatten Subject: This E-mail includes attached file(s) sent from "RNP7DDE58" (Aficio 2035). Scan Date: 1 l.01.200617:33:58 (-0500) 1 I < \ v') ¢~ ~ '"lE S0U1HEAST 1/4 OF OU1HEAST 1/ 4 Of :lJANT TO KCC SERVE SAND 1:U.ING ITofi·"m£?M'~,N~t.i"ANCE .. 0F.1RAcr· "o'". -~ . .,·,•; ·;,;,-.. )9*1--.... ·· . -~,-----.';~ ·o, • 0 • ___ ,lffi!cf'°'s...,,ts"A PRiVA1E TRACT FOR OPEN SPACE AND PRlVATI: STORM DRAINAGE FOR THE SENEflT Of LOTS 1 .THROUGH 117, INCLUS1\IE. EACH OWNERSHIP OF LDlS 1 THROUGH 117, INClUSIVE INCLUDES AN EQUAL AND UNDIVIDED OWNERSHIP IN1EREST IN SAID 1RACT •s•. '!HE SHAMROCK HEIGHTS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MONITORING Of POTENTIAL VIOLATIONS Of THE USES Of THIS TRACT ALONG 'MlH NECESSARY MAINTI:NANCE. SHOULD THE SHAMROCK HEIGHlS HOMEOYMERS ASSOCIATION FAil TO PROPERLY MAINTAIN TRACT •s•, THEN THE OWNERS OF LOlS 1 THROUGH 117, INCWSfVE SHALL BE EOUALL Y RESPONS!B!-E FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF lRACT "S". 16. TRACT "r" IS A PRIVATE TRACT fOR PRIVATE STORM DRAINAGE FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 117, INCLUSIVE. EACH OWNERSHIP OF LOTS 1 'lrlROUGH 117, INCLUSIVE INCLUDES AN EQUAL AND UNDIVIDED OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN SAID lRACT "T". l>IE SHAMROCK HEIGHTS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION SHALL 8( RESPONSIBLE FOR 1'-IE MONITORING OF POTENTIAL VIOLATIONS Of THE USES OF THIS TRACT ALONG WllH NECESSARY MAINTENANCE. SHOULD THE SHAMROCK HElGHTS·HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION FAIL TO PROPERLY MAINTAIN lRACT "T", THEN THE OWNERS OF LOTS 1 lHRO\JGH 117, INCLUSIVE SHALL BE EQUALLY RESPONS!81.t FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF TRACT "T". =-17. TRACT "x" IS A NON-BUILOABLE AREA \'MICH WILL BE CONVEYED BY THE DECLARANT TO EITHER THE OWNER OF TAX LOT 1023059042 OR RETAJNED AS OPEN SPACE. 1RACT X IS NOT ANO SHAU. NOT BE CONSIDERED AS A SEPARATE BUILDING LOT ANO MAY BE OEVELOPEO IN THE FUTURE ONLY IF IT IS C0NSOUDA1ED INTO ONE OR MORE ADJOINING LEGAL LOlS IN ACCORDANCE WllH APPLICABLE KING COUNlY LANO USE REGULATIONS. SEE NOTE ON SHEET 7 Of 10. 18. TRACT ·y-IS A PRIVATE lRACT FOR PRIVATE VEHICULAR ACCESS ANO PUBLIC UTILITIES. EACH OWNERSHIP or lOlS 1 nlROUGH 117, INCLUSl'<t: INCLUDES AN EQUAL AND UNDIVIDED 014,NERSHIP INTEREST IN SAID TRACT "Y'. THE BENEFlOARIES OF THE EASEMENlS OVER SAID TRACT "Y" SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR lHE MAINlENANCE OF THE f ACILl11ES WITHIN SAID TRACT FROM WHICH mEY BENEFIT.£ ,,.._ 19. TRACT "W' IS A NON-BUILOASLE AREA WHICH WILL Br CONVEYED BY THE OfCLARANT TO EllHER THE 0~ OF TAX LOT 1023059308 OR RETAINED AS OPEN SPACE. lRACT "Vf' IS NOT AND SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED AS A SEPARATE BUILDING LOT AND MAY BE OEVELOPED 1N THE FUTURE ONLY lF Ii IS CONSOUOATEO INTO ONE OR MORE AO.JOINING LEGAL LOTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE KING COUNTY LANO USE REGULATIONS. SEE NO'!£ ON SHEET 4 OF 10. 20. THERE IS NO 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN ASSOCIA 1£0 WITH THE WEllAND IN TRACT 'L' DUE TO THE SLOPE OF THE TERRAIN, 21. 'lrlE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN ASSOCIA TEO Wl1H 1'iE WEllANO IN TRACT 'F' IS LOCATED ENTIRELY ON lHE ADJACENT PROPERTY. 22. THE lRACT N01£S SHOWN HEREON ARE NOT INlENOED TO BE IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER. 23. THE OWNERS OF LOT 118 SHALL NOT llE MEMBERS Of lttE SHAMROCK HEIGHTS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION NOR SHAU. lHEY BE SUBJECT TO THE RULES ANO REGULATIONS Of THE SHAMROCK HEIGHTS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. ·-'00-·'fHE--···-·-··-·-.. ····-· ·--··· .. ----·--··-··----1--- INCLUDES NNERS lf THIS /\TION FAIL : EQUALLY -.. ·,.... .... .· .... ·--~ ·.· ·--.. --.·--·--···------·-----------·" ... . . .. . . -··-·.. ... . .._._. __ ,._ .. ,--···-·· I I ;;z;;,... •.... ~-------·-·-·"·--------,, 12112 wa• •·-·--------· ; @ • King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 October 25, 2006 Sara Slatten Cam West Development, Inc. 9720 Northeast 1201h Place, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 RE: Time Extension for Submittal of Additional Information • Proposed Preliminary Plat of the Martin Property, File No. L05P0019 Dear Ms. Slatten: The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Land Use Services Division (LUSD) is granting your request for additional time to submit information and/or studies to LUSD. Please reference my July 25, 2006 for the information requested .. When submitting the information, please provide a cover letter which lists how each requested item has been addressed. Any clarification or explanation of your submittal should also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATIN: Karen Scharer, PPM 11, Current Planning Section 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 If your submittal is hand delivered, please submit it to the Land Use Counter on the first floor at the address above. Your application has been placed "on hold" as of the date of this letter until such time as you are advised that the information you submit satisfies our request, or 14 days after the date the information is received by this division. If the Division determines that the information is insufficient, we will notify you of any additional information which is needed. Please note that supplemental information required after the vesting of a complete application does not affect the validity of the vesting of the application. The extended deadline for the submittal of the requested information is October 31, 2006. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist which may justify a further extension of this date, you may submit such request in writing for consideration by" this Preliminary Plat for the .n Property October 25, 2006 Page 2 of 2 • · .• department. Failure to meet the deadline may be cause for the Department to cancel the application. We request that you submit all of the information in one package. If you have any questions regarding the requested information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-7114 or e-mail Karen.scharer@metrokc.gov. Sincerely, qi.~" Current Planning Section, LUSD .cc: Kim Claussen, PPM Ill, Current Planning Section, LUSD File ' . • • • Page I of I " Scharer, Karen From: Sara Slatten [sslatten@camwest.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 5:36 PM To: Scharer, Karen Subject: RE: Summary of An Phung discussions Karen, Possible to request an extension for L05P0019 until the end of the week. I can have responses for the few remaining items then. Sorry for the delay. Thanks, Sara -----Original Message----- From: Scharer, Karen [mailto:Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV] Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 7:45 AM To: Sara Slatten Subject: RE: Summary of An Phung discussions Sara- Extensions are needed as of 10/1/06 for - L02P0005 L03P0018 as of 10/25/06 - L05P0019 Feel free to request via e-mail. Karen J. Scharer Program!Prr,iject Manager II Current Planning Section Land Use Services Division Department Of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055 206-296-7114 FAX 206-296-7051 karen.scharer@metrokc.gov 10/26/2006 ,• • • Page I of I Sellar '" Ka, n F1·om: To. .,n n, , ,;en [anandtoan@yahoo.com] nda October 08, 2006 9:12 PM Cc. hare . Karen; Floren!, Ray Subject .·gal I· ,ckage of easement -Shamrock/Martin Development at 148th St. SE Attactir e, ts : 3,;5 · 1344-blockage Spring 2006 DSCN3230.JPG; 802512361-easement blockage 10082006.JPG • I, ..... ira. ii Jett h· . \,. 1lU l . y, ,I l'\ ;' ,: :, \'C ic, 11 ....'.,_'S ' -"t· 11, l ,I iii. ;!( y '\,. . I" ()1. ' ·. l)ll' l . I VOL \'G n ppo· 111.· e111d. ~c 11 · now that the easmcnts to my property have been illegally blocked for some time. er :1ccepted Camwest's c I aim nor its proposal to compensate. lo remove the blockage will be necessary for people to have adequate space to turn their · · X SO' strip must be clear of dirt buildup and blocking devices. Attached are two · 10/8/2006. - ,t be removed otherwise J will be forced to call the sheriff this week for offical record. I 111 ·, right on the new Yabgn.com MAIN FtlE COPY j ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services • 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 July 25, 2006 Sara Slatten Cam West Development, Inc. 9720 Northeast 1201h Place, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 RE: 3rd Addendum Request for Additional Information • Proposed Preliminary Plat of the Martin Property, File No. L05P0019 Dear Ms. Slatten: The purpose of this letter is to notify you that, pursuant to the provisions of KCC 20.20.040A, the Land Use Services Division (LUSD) is requesting additional information and/or·studies to complete the review of the above-referenced project as the submittal package was incomplete. The requested information is described on the enclosed "Plat Screening Transmittal Addendum". It is noted that additional copies of the information are needed to process revisions and were previously requested. When submitting the information, please provide a cover letter which lists how each requested item has been addressed. Any clarification or explanation of your submittal should also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATTN: Karen Scharer, PPM II, Current Planning Section 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 If your submittal is hand delivered, please submit it to the Land Use Counter on the first floor at the address above. Your application has been placed "on hold" as of the date of this letter until such time as you are advised that the information you submit satisfies our request, or 14 days after the date the information is received by this division. If the Division determines that the information is insufficient, we will notify you of any additional information which is needed. Please note that supplemental information required after the vesting of a complete application does not affect the validity of the vesting of the application. · The deadline for the submittal of the requested information is October 25, 2006. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist which may justify an extension of this date, you may submit such request in writing for consideration by this department. Failure to meet the deadline may be cause for the Department to cancel the application. MAIN FILE COPY i ) Preliminary Plat for the Mal Property July 25, 2006 Page 2 of 2 • We request that you submit all of the information in one package. If you have any questions regarding the requested information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296- 7114 or e-mail Karen.scharer@metrokc.gov. Sincerely, qk_9 Karen Scharer, PPM II Current Planning Section, LUSD Enclosures cc: Kim Claussen, PPM Ill, Current Planning Section, LUSD, w/encl. Pete Dye, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD, w/encl. Ray Florent, Chief Surveyor/Engineer IV, Engineering Review Sect., LUSD w/encl. Kris Langley, Senior Engineer, Road Services Division, KCDOT, w/encl. I •' L05P0019 July 25, 2006 • PLAT SCREENING TRANSMITTAL 1. Drainage: Please address the following: a. b. Off-Site Conveyance: The preliminary drainage plan proposes an offsite storm pipe through Lot 35 of the adjacent plat of Shamrock; however, the recorded plat for Shamrock does not show a public drainage easement to allow construction of the proposed storm pipe. Please provide documents indicating that a public drainage easement is available in a suitable location for the offsite conveyance of storm water. Since the proposed detention pond on the Martin property does not have a suitable spillway location, the downstream conveyance system and easements must be located and designed to accommodate the 100-year developed overflow from the pond. You have stated that you either have or intend to submit for a drainage variance for relief from the code requirements. Until such time that a variance is approved or information showing compliance with the above is provided, this application will continue on hold. Preliminary Drainage Plan: The onsite features map in the downstream analysis submitted with your plat application shows an existing pipe system, which is not depicted on the preliminary drainage plan. Please update the drainage plan to show any required revisions to the existing pipe system. Based upon the existing mapping, it appears that the existing storm pipes and catch basins near the west property line are designed to collect drainage from the onsite ditches and depression, for uncontrolled discharge to Lots 36 and 37 in Shamrock. The updated drainage plan we are requesting for the Martin application should identify preliminary designs for conveying drainage to an appropriate outlet, with drainage easements for conveyance of offsite flows. Again, a drainage variance for relief from the code requirements is needed or some other alternative. Until such time that a variance is approved or information showing compliance with code is provided, this application will continue on hold. 2. Please address the encroachments that are located on the panhandle of proposed Lot 5 and what access/use agreements with the owner of Tax Lot 1023059355 there are for the continuation of access and use. Please note that through plat conditions, Lot 5 will be prohibited from accessing 148the Ave SE directly via the 14 foot wide panhandle. Staff would encourage your consideration of negotiating with the other owner to see if he would be interested in having that property combined into his Jot under a BLA. / ® King County Department of Development and Envlronmental Services • 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 July 24, 2006 Sara Slatten Cam West Development, Inc. 9720 Northeast 120th Place, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 RE: 3rc1 Addendum Request for Additional Information • Proposed Preliminary Plat of the Martin Property, File No. L05P0019 Dear Ms. Slatten: The purpose of this letter is to notify you that, pursuant to the provisions of KCC 20.20.040A, the Land Use Services Division (LUSD) is requesting additional information and/or studies to complete the review of the above-referenced project as the submittal package was incomplete. The requested information is described on the enclosed "Plat Screening Transmittal Addendum". It is noted that additional copies of the information are needed to process revisions and were previously requested. When submitting the information, please provide a cover letter which lists how each requested item has been addressed. Any clarification or explanation of your submittal should also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATTN: Karen Scharer, PPM II, Current Planning Section 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 If your submittal is hand delivered, please submit it to the Land Use Counter on the first floor at the address above. Your application has been placed "on hold" as of the date of this letter until such time as you are advised that the information you submit satisfies our request, or 14 days after the date the information is received by this division. If the Division determines that the Information is insufficient, we will notify you of any additional information which Is needed. Please note that supplemental information required after the vesting of a complete application does not affect the validity of the vesting of the application. The deadline for the submittal of the requested information is October 24, 2006. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist which may justify an extension of this date, you may submit such request in writing for consideration by this department. Failure to meet A the deadline may be cau1;1e for the Department to cancel the application. }1 ;, .. MAIN FILE COPY ., I Preliminary Plat for the Ma.Property July 24, 2006 Page 2 of 2 • We request that you submit all of the information in one package. If you have any questions regarding the requested information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296- 7114 or e-mail Karen.scharer@metrokc.gov. ~··~ Ka=2PMII Current Planning Section, LUSD Enclosures cc: Kim Claussen, PPM Ill, Current Planning Section, LUSD, w/encl. Pete Dye, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD, w/encl. Ray Floren!, Chief Surveyor/Engineer IV, Engineering Review Sect., LUSD w/encl. Kris Langley, Senior Engineer, Road Services Division, KCDOT, w/encl. , I L05P0019 July 24, 2006 • • PLAT SCREENING TRANSMIITAL 1. Drainage: Please address the following: a. b. Off-Site Conveyance: The preliminary drainage plan proposes an offsite storm pipe through Lot 35 of the adjacent plat of Shamrock; however, the recorded plat for Shamrock does not show a public drainage easement to allow construction of the proposed stonn pipe. Please provide documents indicating that a public drainage easement is available in a suitable location for the offsite conveyance of stonn water. Since the proposed detention pond on the Martin property does not have a suitable spillway location, the downstream conveyance system and easements must be located and designed to accommodate the 100-year developed overflow from the pond. You have stated that you either have or intend to submit for a drainage variance for relief from the code requirements. Until such time that a variance is approved or infonnation showing compliance with the above is provided, this application will continue on hold. Preliminary Drainage Plan: The onsite features map in the downstream analysis submitted with your plat application shows an existing pipe system, which is not depicted on the preliminary drainage plan. Please update the drainage plan to show any required revisions to the existing pipe system. Based upon the existing mapping, it appears that the existing stonn pipes and catch basins near the west property line are designed to collect drainage from the onsite ditches and depression, for uncontrolled discharge to Lots 36 and 37 in Shamrock. The updated drainage plan we are requesting for the Martin application should identify preliminary designs for conveying drainage to an appropriate outlet, with drainage easements for conveyance of offsite flows. Again, a drainage variance ·for relief from the code requirements is needed or some other alternative. Until such time that a variance is approved or infonnation showing compliance with code is provided, this application will continue on hold. ' .. - r.. --·· • Scharer, Karen fyi From: Sent: To: Cc: Claussen, Kimberly Thursday, July 13, 2006 7:35 AM Miles, Joe; Dinsmore, Lisa; Floren!, Ray Scharer, Karen; Dye, Pete Subject: FW: Summary of An Phung discussions Attachments: SDOC3557.pdf; SDOC3543.pdf; SDOC3544.pdf From: Sara Slatten [mailto:sslatten@camwest.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 6:44 PM M.41.UN ~ To: Claussen, Kimberly; Warden, Stephanie Ille CO!li>'if Subject: Summary of An Phung discussions Kim & Stephanie, • Page I of2 The following is a summary of our discussions with An T. "Andy" Phung Which largely took place during the Shamrock Heights platting process. Mr. Phung owns a parcel of property adjacent to the Shamrock Highlands plat. Mr. Phung's only access to public roads was over a 16-foot wide driveway that was also used by our property and two other properties. The enclosed map shows the location of our properties and the driveway. Given the location and access of his property, our discussions began with offers to purchase Mr. Phung's property which would have allowed for public road and utility connections between the northerly and southerly Shamrock Height assemblages. We also offered him an array of easement and/or public road alternatives through a portion of his property whereby Phung would retain ownership of his property and we would provide him utility and road connections. Mr. Phung declined all of our offers. As a result, we worked around his property. The sellers of our property thought they owned the land underlying the common driveway. Their attorney and our attorney each researched the 16 foot "notch and panhandle" tracts, spanning westerly from 148th Avenue SE, to determine who owned it and who had the right to use it. The research of both attorneys showed that although Phung had acquired the right to both tracts for access, he never had title to either tract. The attorneys determined that each of the two tracts was still owned by the heirs of certain owners dating from the 1930s. Attached is a summary of the easement history that we provided Phung in September 2005. Based on this research, in 2002 the Morris Edelman Trust, heirs to the panhandle tract, conveyed the tract to Cam West. In 2004 Deborah Charles, heir to the notch tract, conveyed that tract to us. Our title insurer then was willing to insure our ownership of both tracts. Although we acquired title from the owners, we have always acknowledged Mr. Phung's right to use the tracts for continued access to his property ( even though he now also has public road stubbed to his property, providing alternative access). Throughout our discussions, however, Mr. Phung has insisted that he is the owner of both tracts. In 2004 -2005, we were in the plating process for Shamrock Heights. During clearing activity, we removed a fence.and gate belonging to Mr. Phung that encroached approximately 7,000 square feet into Shamrock Heights. Our subsequent research suggested that the fence and gate most likely dated back to the I 980's and constituted adverse possession. We then acknowledged our error and replaced the fence and gate. During the Shamrock Heights platting review, we attempted to clear up the title to this area by conveying the encroachment area to Mr. Phung and processing a Boundary Line Adjustment. Mr. Phung refused to participate in that effort. Because we could not resolve the issue with Mr. Phung, we designated the encroachment area as a separate tract on the plat of Shamrock Heights and added a note to the plat to address the encroachment area. The note states the encroachment property will be conveyed to Phung upon request or retained as non-buildable open space. This area of encroachment abuts Shamrock and does not affect the Martin property. 07/13/2006 • • Page 2 of2 Towards the end of our attempts to resolve the issues of ownership of the driveway tracts and the encroachment area, Eric Campbell sent Mr. Phung the attached September 14, 2005 letter. In that letter, we offered to convey the encroachment property to Mr. Phung. We also offered to convey the driveway tract (minus the portion that was dedicated as public road) to Mr. Phung. We also offered to compensate Phung for estimated back taxes he incorrectly paid on the easements over the years. We also offered to reimburse him for previous expenses surrounding our discussions. Mr. Phung rejected all of our offers. The Martin property, located south of the driveway tracts, will take acc.ess to the platted streets in Shamrock Heights. No alternative proposal is sought for the easements as they are platted and Phung will have continued access. We believe this is a dispute surrounding a private easement which we have never denied access to Mr. Phung. We also fail to see how his issues are relevant to the Martin property application. Our greatest confusion surrounding his claims was that he never articulated what he wanted from us. I hope this provides clarification to the issues Mr. Phung raises. Please let me know if you have any further questions. Sara Slatten CamWest Development (425) 825-1955; phone (425) 825-1565; fax www.camwest.com «SD0C3557.pdf» «SD0C3543.pdf» «SD0C3544.pdf» 07/13/2006 ~ I ••••• September 14, 2005 Andy Phung P0Box854 Mukilteo, WA 98275 RE: 12415 148u. Avenue SE, Renton Property Boundary Line Adjustment Resolution Dear Andy, Based on the meeting you recently attended with Sara Slatten, enclosed is additional information in response to ·the boundary line encroachment and access easement discussions, which have occurred to date. Additionally, our proposals to . each of these issues are outlined below for your review: 1) Boundary Line Adjustment. Both parties acknowledge that an encroaching fence and gate was previously installed on the Shamrock Highlands, LLC property and was subsequently removed by our contractors. We further acknowledged that the fence and gate were installed at a time predating both parties interest in their respective . properties. We propose to dedicate the strip of property, totaling 6,966 square feet that lies between your east property line and the encroaching fence. While this property is currently .owned by the Shamrock Highlands, LLC it is acknowledged that you have occupied this area for sometime. The proposed new boundary extends to your · north property line. · Please refer to the enclosed Boundary Line Adjustment exhibits for your review. 2) Removed Fence and Gate Replacement: It is acknowledged that our contractor recently ·removed the fence and gate along your east property line. We agree to install a 6-foot cedar fence back to the :existing location as well as to reinstall the gate. Please refer to the enclosed Fence and Gate Exhibit for the locations. 3) Notch and Panhandle Easements: We have confirmed with King County that we.will be req~ired to co_nvertthe notch easement and a portion of the panhandle easement to public right of way and therefore will retain ownership. The easement area depicted as Area C can be deeded to you if you prefer to own and maintain this area. Regardless of easement ownership, the entire easement area will remain ·open for continued access to your properly whether or not is dedicated for public right of way. Areas A and B will be improved to public street Exhibit No. _2.!_S).,,._ ___ _ liem No. bDS P~l~ Received 3 · 2'2. · C)'+:- King County Hearing Examiner ·····-····· standards and Area C will remain as an easement, open for access to your property. Should you decline to accept Area C, we will retain this area as an easement tract and it will be owned and maintained by the future Shamrock Heights Homeowners' Association. Additionally, if you decline to accept ownership of Area C, we agree to reimburse you $16,000 as a good faith gesture since and to compensate you for the taxes you incurred on property you did not legally own. Please see the attached exhibits, which shows Areas A, B and C and the spreadsheet showing how we arrived at this reimbursement amount. Additionally, you requested a summary of the ownership of the notch and panhandle property, deeds of conveyance; and the title report, which are all · enclosed. 4) Reimbursement: As previously agreed to, we will reimburse.yo~ for $4884.64 for the expenses you incurred and had previously provided receipts for. · I look forward to resolving this issue by Monday, September 19, 2005. Sara · Slatten will contact you on Monday to confirm which option for the easement you would like to proceed with. Sincerely, C #v Ak> _ fc1 Eric H. Cam:-i:r President Cam West Development, Inc. enclosures ,, I I , J --:--·------------------- 2' " ::;,-,,~u,n ... ,l,.,,F;.,.. I ~ I --,---~---,--·;.; J-· ! ---___ ,_.... .. -"' .. ' ..... ~ "'" --, .• " " ...... ;;I {ala, -,sa . 1-0 , --, ,,.,,, OOI al . ON • OS N0SSNV9 • H • ) "3'S '3/\V Hil u .. ,., rt 1 t0 -;;..;-;;-;-M~~--:-~~ • a•n --~~ 0 0 ' , » n • J J J < ~~ ~ ''k "'~ " :a . 0 ~ ~ ' • s-4 •I , ~ !I '<,,I, l :I ~ :! I 90· l~ -c-~,'f.' ""vJ :~ l e, :; "' •• ),~ ~ " ~ ru ' . . • .. 'g ~ cC -. -~ l ~ !! ~ m l t 0 ru ru ~ ' m. . I . 'I, m l PANHANDLE EASEMENT: 16 x 631.25 feet • Edelman: Dating back to the 1930's, Edelman previously owned the Martin Property, a section of property south of Martin, and the 16 x 631 foot panhandle easement that extends from your southeast property corner to 148th Ave SE. (see map) • On March 5, 1938, Edelman deeded a portion of their property to John and Anne Belmondo. However, the deed did not include the 16 x 631 foot panhandle easement. • On June 10, 1942, Edelman deeded a portion of their property to the Goodes. The deed did not include the 16 x 631 foot panhandle easement. • On March 3, 1944, Edelman deeded a portion of land to Dora Schubert. Again, the deed did not include the 16 x 631 foot panhandle easement. • After these transactions, the Edelman had transferred the (I) NW 1/4 to the Goods; (2). the N 1/2 of the NE 1/4 to Ms. Schubert; and (3) the S 1/2 of the NE 1/4 (except the 16 x 631 foot strip) to the Belmondos. Title to the 16 x 631 foot strip was apparently forgotten and remained in Edelman's riame up until we acquired it. NOTCH EASEMENT: 16 x 50 feet • Goode Family: In 193 7 the Goods purchased property from the Edelman, which included the parcel you own, and the property directly south of you which we now own. Goode also owned the 16 x 50 foot notch easement property. ( see map) • When the Goodes split the property up, they segregated the parcel that you current own from the rest of the property and they excluded the 16 x 50 foot notch easement from this sale. The notch easement was never conveyed until recently when Goode deeded it to the Shamrock Highlands, LLC. SUMMARY: Based on the history of the deed transactions, the notch and panhandle easements were created to benefit adjacent parcels including the properties that are subsequently owned by you and the Shamrock Highlands, LLC. The panhandle and notch easement properties were never sold by the Edelman or the Goodes when they sold off their surrounding properties in the 1930's-1940's. In 200 I we researched the ownership of the notch and panhandle easement properties. We reviewed legal descriptions for your property and for the surrounding area and determined that the easements were not owned by you or any of the surrounding parcel owners. After researching further, we determined that the heirs to Goode and Edelman still owned the easement properties; Goode owned the notch and Edelman still owned the panhandle. u ..... , ...... -~ •• ff:'N.Ge ?·SJA-TE. · t=:XHl&rT --~f!_!2_0,"!_fl_S!'. __ -· _'.".Jl.. 11 EAST t/4 C0RN0t 7!-. · ~ CCNCJ/'7E MONIJUl!NT IN CAst I \ W/ .... ~ DISC NiO TACK . D'MI. 1.5' j {lt-16-00) CO : NI . . ~i /NSTA'L--l-(oFT 050~ f13NCAE.. 'i A1,,DN6 Pf2-P Pef2.-"/ LIN!= _________ ~ I ' I J I ' I ! I ! --"l~f:ilf"----'/7'""--A~---LI ;.;:-;.-~~~~---1· 1561,47 OU. SB8'.20'33•E 651.47 587.JJ RU. ~81: :t ------------------~-' ~ /! WORTH UN'£, NW 1/4, e! 1/4, st 1/4 WEST UJE: Of N 1/2. >IE 1/4, SE 1/4, SE 1/4 (OLL) LOT B (RU) ~ ! S88 JJ 272.23 I i! !~ !N N! ~-I" N! ~ ,.,i;.. !~ ~ i - Iii . 677,B2 RU. l Lu -__ ,, .. r.!llJ:::--::----:::~m~~======~~=!!r.i!'l'""-~!!..~------=J 'II) . Nml'20'-42"W 614..70 RLL . j :w,;r-.r,,., -::;~~-;;;;.-------'-----~~-~-----------~ ~ 1 SE 1/-4. St 1/4 Nt 1/•, SE 1/. 4, st 1/4 I """' I [ i: I : !; ~ LINE NE=SW ,., ~! . . ~ AP'ffZ-u,(IMkT~ . . i GA-TE-UJNsT.A:L-LA-lf ON . : / "j_[)(....,-,AtTi.ON. ··-_ . S.E •.. 128TH __ STREET··---~ c,i-A'l'~~ BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT ~~ot '"'~4..~ FOR ·l~~· :• : ~ CAMWEST DEVELOPMENT INC. fOUHD PUNCH MARK IN 3• BRASS ~ SURFACE MONUWENT S,E, CORNER OF . , SECllON 10 {07-26-01} ·1'1Y OJ: RENlON MONUMENT NO. 1852 N: son04.P4 (; 1866469,60 PORTION OF: NW 1/4 AND NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4, SECTION 10, lWP. 23N., RGE SE., W.M., KJNG COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SEE SHEET ~ ~ "'-to 1t581 •• AND ;it~.!}~i? r, D\11'1. BY I.DATE I JOB NO. . . . ... .... ,, " ...... AW!l Q /14/n.i; 01-1fi9 •.. _ • ott»-Bl.A.OIIIV • Scharer, Karen From: Sent: To: Cc: Claussen, Kimberly Thursday, July 13, 2006 7:35 AM Miles, Joe; Dinsmore, Lisa; Floren!, Ray Scharer, Karen; Dye, Pete Subject: FW: Summary of An Phung discussions Attachments: SDOC3557.pdf; SDOC3543.pdf; SDOC3544.pdf fyi From: Sara Slatten [mailto:sslatten@camwest.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 6:44 PM To: Claussen, Kimberly; Warden, Stephanie Subject: Summary of An Phung discussions Kim & Stephanie, • Page 1 of2 Exhibit No. _.,_l :f-'----- liem No. L(::)'SP<::>s::.1, Recoil'"'' .~Z..2.-s:>+ King Guumy 1-1earing Examiner The following is a summary of our discussions with An T. "Andy" Phung which largely took place during the Shamrock Heights platting process. Mr. Phung owns a parcel of property adjacent to the Shamrock Highlands plat. Mr. Phung's only access to public roads was over a 16-foot wide driveway that was also used by our property and two other properties. The enclosed map shows the location of our properties and the driveway. Given the location and access of his property, our discussions began with offers to purchase Mr. Phung's property which would have allowed for public road and utility connections between the northerly and southerly Shamrock Height assemblages. We also offered him an array of easement and/or public road alternatives through a portion of his property whereby Phung would retain ownership of his property and we would provide him utility and road connections. Mr. Phung declined all of our offers. As a result, we worked around his property. The sellers of our property thought they owned the land underlying the common driveway. Their attorney and our attorney each researched the 16 foot "notch and panhandle" tracts, spanning westerly from 148th Avenue SE, to determine who owned it and who had the right to use it. The research of both attorneys showed that although Phung had acquired the right to both tracts for access, he never had title to either tract. The attorneys determined that each of the two tracts was still owned by the heirs of certain owners dating from the 1930s. Attached is a summary of the easement history that we provided Phung in September 2005. Based on this research, in 2002 the Morris Edelman Trust, heirs to the panhandle tract, conveyed the tract to Cam West. In 2004 Deborah Charles, heir to the notch tract, conveyed that tract to us. Our title insurer then was willing to insure our ownership of both tracts. Although we acquired title from the owners, we have always acknowledged Mr. Phung's right to use the tracts for continued access to his property ( even though he now also has public road stubbed to his property, providing alternative access). Throughout our discussions, however, Mr. Phung has insisted that he is the owner of both tracts. In 2004 -2005, we were in the plating process for Shamrock Heights. During clearing activity, we removed a fence and gate belonging to Mr. Phung that encroached approximately 7,000 square feet into Shamrock Heights. Our subsequent research suggested that the fence and gate most likely dated back to the l 980's and constituted adverse possession. We then acknowledged our error and replaced the fence and gate. During the Shamrock Heights platting review, we attempted to clear up the title to this area by conveying the encroachment area to Mr. Phung and processing a Boundary Line Adjustment. Mr. Phung refused to participate in that effort. Because we could not resolve the issue with Mr. Phung, we designated the encroachment area as a separate tract on the plat of Shamrock Heights and added a note to the plat to address the encroachment area. The note states the encroachment property will be conveyed to Phung upon request or retained as non-buildable open space. This area of encroachment abuts Shamrock and does not affect the Martin property. 07/13/2006 • • Page 2 of2 Towards the end of our attempts to resolve the issues of ownership of the driveway tracts and the encroachment area, Eric Campbell sent Mr. Phung the attached September 14, 2005 letter. In that letter, we offered to convey the encroachment property to Mr. Phung. We also offered to convey the driveway tract (minus the portion that was dedicated as public road) to Mr. Phung. We also offered to compensate Phung for estimated back taxes he incorrectly paid on the easements over the years. We also offered to reimburse him for previous expenses surrounding our discussions. Mr. Phung rejected all of our offers. The Martin property, located south of the driveway tracts, will take access to the platted streets in Shamrock Heights. No alternative proposal is sought for the easements as they are platted and Phung will have continued access. We believe this is a dispute surrounding a private easement which we have never denied access to Mr. Phung. We also fail to see how his issues are relevant to the Martin property application. Our greatest confusion surrounding his claims was that he never articulated what he wanted from us. I hope this provides clarification to the issues Mr. Phung raises. Please let me know if you have any further questions. Sara Slatten CamWest Development (425) 825-1955; phone (425) 825-1565; fax www.camwest.com «SD0C3557.pdf» «SD0C3543.pdf» «SD0C3544.pdf» 07/13/2006 ~T.I!}N.? --. ... 121121161h Ave. NE "' Kirkland, WA 880-44 UI ..J 426.821.8448 0) 14 .. 22 www.trtadassoc.com ..J .. ::c .... ::c !;; ., 43 .... 16 17 18 19 20 ~ e ID .. 15 ~ • 23 C, i,... ,!; -ill >-42 I ... ~ ~ .... rn :t 0:: _._.,,(\ w !l! ~ ..... 0. SE 124TH PL 24 0 41 <( Cl) 0:: / TRACT D 0. ::c i,... .... ~ c., ., <: z V> ~ ::, 40 32 JI 30 29 28 27 26 f-~ I (.) 0. " f" 25 ~ ~ / ' !AREA AREA 8 I SE 125TH ST AREA C ~ ~ I ~ (.) ,., 33 AREA A: 797 SQ. FT. () .. AREA B: 2,596 SQ. FT. ~- Q:; ~ AREA C: 7,504 SQ. FT. I.) "' 34 ~ • i -GERRY BUCK DISIGlilDa 35 00)11, SES SCALE: 1" : 100' CIIXtl!D: NAY DAI& 9/1J/05 SUI.I!, BOlllZ.: 100' li: q :;; 36 lllT.: 5 IOB!itlm& 01-159 Sllm N1llllllR "' ~ "' 1 o• 1 ' "' . . • • Page I of I Scharer, Karen From: Sara Slatten [sslatten@camwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 3:05 PM To: loan nguyen Cc: Scharer, Karen; Floren!, Ray; Monte Dunn Subject: RE: Illegal blockage of easement -Shamrock/Martin Development at 148th St. SE Andy, We are in the process of contacting the builder to the south of you to remove the barrier and the dirt pile as it appears he is likely responsible for both. We've determined that our contractor did not place either the barrier or the dirt. We will follow up until completed. Sara Slatten -----Original Message----- From: toan nguyen [mailto:anandtoan@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 9:12 PM To: Sara Slatten Cc: karen.scharer@metrokc.gov; ray.florent@metrokc.gov Subject: Illegal blockage of easement -Shamrock/Martin Development at 148th St. SE Hi Sara, This letter is to let you know that the easments to my property have been illegally blocked for some time. As you knew, I have never accepted Camwest's claim nor its proposal to compensate. Your expedient support to remove the blockage will be necessary for people to have adequate space to tum their vehicles around. The 16' X 50' strip must be clear of dirt buildup and blocking devices. Attached are two images taken on Sunday 10/8/2006. Again, the blockage must be removed otherwise I will be forced to call the sheriff this week for offical record. Thank you, Andy Phung ···--.. ·-----··----------·--··----·---------------------- Get your email and more, right on the new Yahoo.com 10/11/2006 l! ~ :] = !~~~ • • ~ ':t O ~,~ cl io.. .. w , !I _; ... , ~ .R i i R • • N l ~ \:l __ , ' • ij . I . 'I, r.1 ~ ~~~~ ~ot:111\!d:J..4t/i@iil •• June 22, 2006 · Karen Scharer, Planner King County DOES 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton WA 98055-1219 RE: Martin Property: L05P0019 Preliminary Plat Resilbmittal #2 Dear Karen, ' ' • • I I received your April 26, 2006 letter today via email requesting additional copies of submittal materials. Also, you response a response to correspondence submitted to you fromour neighborAndy Phung. Below are responses to each of your requests: 1. Submit two additional copies of: a. April 20, 2006 letter from Cam West \o DOES b. April 20, 2006 letter from Tijad Assoc. to ODES c. Quit Claim Deed E>diib!f No._._! ..,.J)'----- . Item r~o. l-~j5€1::)<::::i tl _ Received :> · Z-7--~-=T--; l(ing County Hearing Examiner Response: Enclosed are two additional copies of the above requested 'information. Please note we did not submit a 4/20/06 letter from Triad. 2. Access: As discussed in my April 24th letter, documentation has been recently submitted to DOES which further contends whether legal access can be provided. Please address the documentation submitted by An T. Phung and sent to you on April 24, 2006. Provide three copies ofinforination as part of your response. Response: As mentioned above enclosed are two additional copies of the quit claim deeds from The Morris Edelman Trust and Deborah Charles to Cam West Development. Each where heirs to a portion of the 16 foot easement area that Mr. Phung claims he owns. In reality Mr. Phung never had title to either of these easement parcels. We know this because our attorney researched Mr. Phung's chain of title:· Mr. Phung incorrectly asserts his ownership based on the fact that the King County assessors department incorrectly assigned the easement parcels to his underlying parcel: I 023059042. At the time of the Shamrock Heights I plat recording, we worked through this issue with Ray Florent and Steve VanPatten. Subsequently,'a portion of this easement property was dedicated to King County for public ROW and a portion of the property was conveyed to the- ~.~ • I . . ' •:1 ' ~ ~~~~ @w1W§l#t@iml • • ' Shamrock Heights HOA to own and maintain: Throughout this process we have always acknowledged Mr. Phung's right to continue to use this, easement. The Martin Property has rights to this easement as well. Our proposal is to connect the future Martin plat ROW to the dedicated 125th Street ROW to the north. I have left a message,with Ray Florent requesting a. conference call between the three of us to confirm this issue and to answer any further questions you may have. We look forward to proceeding with the review process and getting a hearing schedule soon, I can be reached. at ( 425) 825-1955 should you need any' additional information or have any further questions._ · Sincerely, :if: Cam West Development, Inc. enclosures -· •· . r;---® • • King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 April 26, 2006 Sara Slatten Cam West Development, Inc. · 9720 Northeast 1201h Place, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 RE: 2nd Addendum Request for Additional Information Proposed Preliminary Plat of the Martin Property, File No. L05P0019 Dear Ms. Slatten: The purpose of this letter is to notify you that, pursuant to th.e provisions of KCC 20.20.040A, the Land Use Services Division (LUSD) is requesting additional information and/or studies to complete the review of the above-referenced project as the submittal package was incomplete. The requested information is described on the enclosed "Plat Screening Transmittal Addendum". It is noted that additional copies of the information are needed to process revisions and were previously requested. Additionally, please note item# 9 of the addendum. · When submitting the information, please provide a cover letter which lists how each requested item has been addressed. Any clarification or explanation of your submittal should also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATIN: Lanny Henoch, PPM II, Current Planning Section 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 If your submittal is hand delivered, please submit it to the Land Use Counter on the first floor at the address above. Your application has been placed "on hold" as of the date of this letter until such time as you are advised that the information you submit satisfies our request, or 14 days after the date the information is received by this division. If the Division determines that the information is insufficient, we will notify you of any additional information which is needed. Please note that supplemental information required after the vesting of a complete application does not affect the validity of the vesting of the application. The deadline for the submittal of the requested information is July 26, 2006. Because of this additional request, your deadline for submittal of documents previously requested is also extended, see attached. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist which may justify an extension of this date, you may submit such request in writing for consideration by MAIN FILE COPY Preliminary Plat for th.artin Property April 26, 2006 Page 2 of 2 • this department. Failure to meet the deadline may be cause for the Department to cancel the application. We request that you submit all of the information in one package. If you have any questions regarding the requested information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296- 7114 or e-mail Karen.scharer@metrokc.gov. Sincerely, ~~ Karen Sc rer, P Current lanning Section, LUSD Enclosures cc: Kim Claussen, PPM Ill, Current Planning Section, LUSD, w/encl. Pete Dye, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD, w/encl. Ray Floren!, Chief Surveyor/Engineer IV, Engineering Review Sect., LUSD w/encl. Kris Langley, Senior Engineer, Road Services Division, KCDOT, w/encl. r /) L05P0019 April 26, 2006 • • PLAT SCREENING TRANSMITTAL 1. Submit two additional copies of: a. April 20, 2006 letter from CamWest to ODES b. April 20, 2006 letter from Triad Assoc. to DOES c. Quit Claim Deed 2. Access: As discussed in my April 24 1h letter, documentation has been recently submitted to ODES which further contends whether legal access can be provided. Please address the documentation submitted by An T. Phung and sent to you on April 24, 2006. Provide three copies of information as part of your response. .. , ,· ® King County . Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 April 24, 2006 Sara Slatten • Cam West Development, Inc. 9720 Northeast 120th Place, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 RE: Addendum Request for Additional Information • Proposed Preliminary Plat of the Martin Property, File No. L05P0019 Dear Ms. Slatten: The purpose of this letter is to notify you that, pursuant to the provisions of KCC 20.20.040A, the Land Use Services Division (LUSD) is requesting additional information and/or studies to complete the review of the above-referenced project. The requested information is described on the enclosed "Plat Screening Transmittal Addendum" -specifically please see item # 9. When submitting the information, please provide a cover letter which lists how each requested item has been addressed. Any clarification or explanation of your submittal should also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division · ATTN: Lanny Henoch, PPM II, Current Planning Section 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 If your submittal is hand delivered, please submit it to the Land Use Counter on the first floor at the address above. Your application has been placed "on hold" as of the date of this letter until such time as you are advised that the information you submit satisfies our request, or 14 days after the date the information is received by this division. If the Division determines that the information is insufficient, we will notify you of any additional information which is needed. Please note that . supplemental information required after the vesting of a complete application does not affect the validity of the vesting of the application. The deadline for the submittal of the requested information is July 24, 2006, Because of this additional request, your deadline for submittal of documents previously requested is also extended, see attached. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist which may justify an extension of this date, you may submit such request in writing for consideration by this department. Failure to meet the deadline may be cause for the Department to cancel the application. MAIN FILE COPY Preliminary Plat for ta,artin Property April 24, 2006 Page 2 of 2 • We request that you submit all of the information in one package. If you have any questions regarding the requested information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296- 7114 or e-mail Karen.scharer@metrokc.gov. Sincerely, 4'a-_9-JL Karen Scharer, PPM II Current Planning Section, LUSD Enclosures cc: Kim Claussen, PPM Ill, Current Planning Section, LUSD, w/encl. Pete Dye, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD, w/encl. Ray Floren!, Chief Surveyor/Engineer IV, Engineering Review Sect., LUSD w/encl. Kris Langley, Senior Engineer, Road Services Division, KCDOT, w/encl. I • ., , L05P0019 April 24, 2006 • • PLAT SCREENING TRANSMITTAL 1. Drainage: Please address the following: 2. 3. a. Off-Site Conveyance: The preliminary drainage plan proposes an offsite storm pipe through Lot 35 of the adjacent plat of Shamrock; however, the recorded plat for Shamrock does not show a public drainage easement to allow construction of the proposed storm pipe. Please provide documents indicating that a public drainage easement is available in a · suitable location for the offsite conveyance of storm water. Since the proposed detention pond on the Martin property does not have a suitable spillway location, the downstream conveyance system and easements must be located and designed to accommodate the 100-year developed overflow from the pond. b. Preliminary Drainage Plan: The onsite features map in the downstream analysis submitted with your plat application shows an existing pipe system, which is not depicted on the preliminary drainage plan. Please update the drainage plan to show any required revisions to the existing pipe system. Based upon the existing mapping, it appears that the existing storm pipes and catch basins near the west property line are designed to collect drainage from the onsite ditches and depression, for uncontrolled discharge to Lots 36 and 37 in Shamrock. The updated drainage plan we are requesting for the Martin application should identify preliminary designs for conveying drainage to an appropriate outlet, with drainage easements for conveyance of offsite flows. Wetlands: Our wetlands biologist, Nick Gillen, has reviewed the wetland study submitted with your application and has visited the site. Based on Mr. Gillen's analysis, we have concluded the feature on the west boundary of the subject property is not a wetland, because it appears to have been artificially created through the conveyance and discharge of collected stormwater. Therefore, we recommend that you revise the proposed plat design and eliminate Tract B. Traffic Analysis: Please provide a limited scope traffic impact analysis to analyze the need for left-turn channelization at the intersection of 148'" Ave. SE with the plat entrance into the Shamrock plat. Please evaluate under the scenario of build-out of Shamrock, East Renton, Rosemonte and the Aster Park plats. 4. Pedestrian Walkway: We wish to make you aware it appears to us there is a need for a pedestrian walkway from the onsite cul-de-sac bulb to 1481h Ave. SE, as contemplated by King County Road Standards Sec. 2.0BC. We recommend -you take this into consideration when preparing-a revision-to the plat design. · · 5. Topography: Please verify that the topographic contours shown on the plat map set are based upon a field survey of the site, and place a note to that effect on the plans. I L05P0019 April 24, 2006 • • 6. Power Company Easement: The title report submitted with the plat application indicates that an easement granted to the Snoqualmie Falls White River Power Company crosses the site. Please show the location and width of this easement on the plat map. 7. Significant Trees: Pursuant to the requirements of KCC 16.82.156, please submit a "significant tree inventory" of the site, to identify the approximate location of "significant trees" on the property. (Note that a "significant tree" is defined in KCC 21A.06.1167.) In addition, please submit a conceptual tree preservation plan to show how the requirements of KCC 16.82.156 will be met. 8. Access: Access to the subject plat is proposed from the north via 146'" Ave. SE, and from the west. The construction of public roads via these two routes will involve crossing a strip of land 16 feet wide, which lies adjacent to the proposed plat. If this 16-foot-wide strip of land is owned by CamWest, please provide documentation to show this. Alternatively, if this strip of land is owned by another landowner, please provide correspondence from that landowner indicating a willingness to deed the requisite property to King County, upon the recording of the subject plat, in order to create a public road. Finally, if the ownership of this strip of land is in dispute, please indicate whether a lawsuit has been filed to resolve this matter. 9. Access: As discussed above, documentation has been recently submitted to DOES which further contends whether legal access can be provided. Please address the attached documentation submitted by An T. Phung. Please provide 15 copies of a revised plat map, and eight copies of any other reports or maps which are submitted. •• • • ~~~ L~~fooio - Lanny Henoch, PPM II ~ f {(;; f{E n n_n re::[OJ King County DOES -ffu \VI 1£ Ill 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW . APR 2 1 200B U Renton WA 98055-1219 K.c. D.D.E . -.s. • I RE: Martin Property: LOSP0019 Dear Mr. Henoch, · The following resubmittal is in response to your February 10, 2006 request for revisions for the Martin Property Preliminary Plat. lbe ·following is a list of your paraphrased comments and a response is in bold below: · !) Drainage: · a. Off-site'Conveyance: Provide clocumentation indi~ating that a public drainage ~asement in available in the Shamrock Plat, adjacent to lot 35. The downstream conveyance system and easements must be located and designed to accommodate the 100- year developed overflow from the pond. Response: A sform variance will be submitted to Mark Bergam concurrently with this resubmittal. The variance addresses the easement between lots 35 and 3_6 as well as the proposed conveyance and pond overflow system for Martin. Please refer to the enclosed copy of the variance. b. Preliminary Drainage Plan: Update the drainage plan to show revisions to the existing piped system, located at the westerly property line. Response: The existing piped system is proposed for removal and noted on the utility plan, page 2. 2) Wetlands: Eliminate Tract Bas the designed wetland has been artificially created. Response: Tract B ha_s been eliminated from the plat map.· 3) Traffic Analysis: Provide a limited scope impact analysis to analyze the need for a left hand turn lane. -- ~-------~ --.- ~ l;m;J~~a WJJf&Df:l11W4-n@@Iii\ • • Response: Please refer to the enclosed TIA from Chris Foi:ester, Transportation Engineering NW.-It was determined that a left had turn lane is not warranted for-the proposal. 4) Pedestrian Walkway: There appears to be a need for aped walkway from the cul-de-sac to 148'h Ave SE. Evaluate · · · Response:· Our proposal is to not provide a pedestrian walkway from the internal cul-de-sac to 1481h. If provided, the.path would he · awkwardly located within lot 5. The 16-foot easement that is.located between Martin and the Shamrock plat is better suited for the pedestrian access to 1481h Ave SE. This easement is improved with a crushed rock/ asphalt surface and has very low· traffic volumes associated with it. At th.is time the house on the Martin site and the two hontes, located on the ·adjaceri~ Phung property, are the only homes using the easement.· The Martin property is a beneficiary to this easement and will have continued rights for easement access . . ' . 5) Topography: Verify the topo contours shown on the plat map are based on field survey of the site and note on· the plans. Response: The topo contours have been verified and the plans noted at the lower left hand corned of the preliminary plat map. 6) Power· Company Easement: Title report contains a Snoqualmie Falls White River power easement. Show location on the plans. · Response: The location of the Snoqualmie Fall easement is not known. The documentation does not provide any specific location. This · easement was also referenced for the Shamrock plat and determined to not be an issue during the platting process. We have been successful in the past with getting _these pow.er easements relinquished if determined necessary. 7) Significant Trees: Submit a significant tree inventory of the site. Submit a conceptual tree preservation plan. -Response.: Please refer to the enclosed tree preservation plan·, sheet 3. The trees located on site are shown and the proposed saved trees are noted. · 8) Access: Provide documentation Cam West owns the 16-foot strip of land . adjacent to the proposed plat that will 1:,e used for public access. ~ ~~~~ ~of:Hli!f.(~..fi.ci@Jii) • • Response: Enclosed is a copy of the quit claim deed from Deborah Charles to the Shamrock Highlands, LLC. Ms. Charles was the legal heir to this easement property. Her grandfather owned this easement property in the 1950's. The grandfather also owned the surrounding_ property to the.north and south. When he sold off portions of the· property, he never conveyed the easement to any subsequent owners. This 1_6-foot property was included with the Shamrock plat and an inset of the plat is enclosed. . · • I Enclosed are the following for your review: I) One (I) copy of your February I 0, 2006 letter. 2) Fifte\:n (15) copies of the revised plat map, utility plan and tree retention plan by Triad dated 4/3/06. · 3) Eight (8) copies of the Traffic Memorandum, limited TIA, dated March 22, 2006. _ 4) Once (1) copy of the storm variance request to Mark Bergam, dat<pd April 20, 2006. . · . · -. 5) One (I) copy of the 20044uit claim deed from _Deborah Charles and · inset of the Shamrock Heights I plat. Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please call me at (425) 825-1955. Cam West Development, Inc. enclosures DATE: TO: FROM: RE: • Transportation Engineering NorthWest ' March 22, 2006 Kristen Langley King County Chris Forster, P.E. TENW Martin Property Plat Limited Scope Traffic Analysis TENW Project No. 4045 • Technical Memorandum This memorandum documents the limited scope traffic analysis requested by King County as documented in the Plat Screening Transmittal comments for the proposed Martin Property Plat dated February 10, 2006 (see Attachment A, comment #3). This analysis includes forecasts of future year traffic volumes at 148th Ave SE/SE 124th Street to assess the need for northbound left-turn channelization at the intersection. The proposed Martin Plat would consist of 13 single family lots located west of 148th Ave SE, just south of the Shamrock Plat which is currently under construction. Access is proposed through the Shamrock Plat via the extension of 146.lh Ave SE south into the property, ending in a cul-de-sac. Access would also be provided via a new proposed connection between 146th Ave SE and 144th Pl SE Gust west of the Plat entrance), and via an access easement running along the north side of the Plat, which has a direct connection to 148th Ave SE. Full buildout of the Martin Property Plat is expected to occur in 2009. Trip Generation The trip generation rates for the proposed Martin Property Plat were based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 71" Edition, 2003 for Land Use Code (LUC) 210, Single-Family Detached Housing. The weekday a.m. peak hour, p.m. peak hour, and daily trip generation calculations are shown in Table 1. · Table 1 Martin Property Plat Trip Generation Trip Directional S~llt Tris Time Period Area1 Rate2 Enter Exit In Out Total Weekday AM Peak Hour 13 du .0.75 25% 75% 2 8 10 Weekday PM Peak Hour 13 du 1.01 63% 37% 8 5 13 Weekday Daily 13 du 60 60 120 1du = dwelling units 2Tri eneration based on ITE Tri Generation Manual, 71h Edition 2003. Transportation Engineering/Operations , Impact Studies , Design Services , Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6" Street South • Kirkland, WA 98033 • omce (206) 361-7333 • Fax (425) 889-TENW(8369) ~ o, r.: °E! "' ..n Cl C: 0 ·,= m ...... "' :r. >, -C: -15 E ..n ci -0 :::, "-' 0 2 ·> c.:, E ·c3 r::n '-' a, a, C: = a: ::2 • ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest • Memo to Kristen Langley March 22, 2006 Page2 As shown in Table 1, the proposed development of the Martin property is estimated to generate a total of 120 new weekday daily trips, of which 10 are estimated to be generated during the weekday a.m. peak hour (2 entering, 10 exiting), and 13 are estimated to be generated during the weekday p.m. peak hour (8 entering, 5 exiting). Traffic Volume Forecasts at 1481h Ave SE/SE 124th Street Existing weekday p.m. peak hour traffic volumes at 148th Ave SE/SE 124th Street were based on turning movement counts conducted by Traffic Data Gathering (TDG), Inc. on Tuesday, March 14, 2006. It should be noted that at the time of the counts, there were no occupied dwelling units in the Shamrock Plat which is currently under construction. Thus, traffic entering/exiting the west leg was observed to be construction and/or real estate traffic only, and is not included in the future year traffic volume forecasts. The existing weekday p.m. peak hour traffic volumes at 148th Ave SE/SE 124'" Street are summarized on Figure 1 attached. Year 2009 baseline p.m. peak hour traffic volume forecasts at 148th Ave SE/SE 124th Street account for a background growth rate, and traffic from approved pipeline development in the project vicinity. The background growth rate assumed in this analysis was based on that used in the Shamrock and East Renton TIAs (2.6 percent annually). Per King County's request, traffic from the following pipeline developments was also added: • Shamrock Plat (117 lots) • East Renton and Rosemont Plats (91 lots) • Aster Park Plat (37 lots) The p.m. peak hour trip assignment from the Shamrock Plat was based on the August 1, 2002 TIA, which analyzed a total of 126 lots, and should therefore be considered conservative. The East Renton and Rosemont Plat traffic was assigned based on the January 16, 2002 TIA for East Renton, factored by 91/67 = 1.36 (since the TIA was analyzed for 67 lots). Lastly, the p.m. peak hour trip assignment from the Aster Park plat was based on the November 1, 2000 TIA, which analyzed a total of 37 lots. Figure 2 illustrates the year 2009 baseline weekday p.m. peak hour traffic volumes at 148"' Ave SE/SE 124'" St. New project-generated traffic from the 13-lot Martin Property was assigned to the road network based on the distribution assumptions shown in the Shamrock TIA. As a conservative assumption, all of the project traffic was assumed to travel through the. Shamrock Plat to the north and enter/exit the site at 1481h Ave SE/SE 124'" Street. The project trip distribution and assignment is shown on Figure 3. Adding the project trip assignment to the year 2009 baseline traffic volumes (Figure 2) results in the forecasted year 2009 with-project weekday p.m. peak hour traffic volumes, shown on Figure 4. Transportadon Engineering/Operations , Impact Studies , Design Services , Transportation PLmnfng/Forecasting 816 6" Street South • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office /206) 361-7333 • Fax /125) 889-TENW/8369) • ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest • Memo ta Kristen Langley March 22, 2006 Page 3 It should be noted that several other more convenient routes are available for traffic destined to/from NE 4th Street (SE 128'h Street). These routes are illustrated on Figure 5 and include: 1. Travel via NE 4th Street, Jericho Ave, NE 4th Ct, 144th Pl SE, and a new proposed connection between 146th Ave SE and 1441h Place SE. 2. Travel via NE 4th Street, Lyons Ave, NE 4th Ct, 144th Pl SE, and a new proposed connection between 146th Ave SE and 144th Place SE. 3. Travel via NE 4th Street, 148th Ave SE, and the roadway located on the access easement running along the north side of the property. Since the routes described above may provide more convenient and direct access than the route through the Shamrock Plat via SE 124th Street, the project volumes estimated at 148th Ave SE/SE 124th Street should be considered conservative. Left-turn Lane Analysis at 1481h Ave SE/SE 124th Street The WSDOT Design Manual outlines the following guidelines to determine whether or not to consider left-turn lanes at unsignalized intersections on two-lane highways: • A traffic analysis indicates that a left-turn lane will reduce congestion. On two- lane highways, use Figure 910-Sa (Design Manual) based on total traffic volume (DHV) for both directions and percent left-turn traffic, to determine if further investigation is needed. • An accident study indicates that a left-turn lane will reduce accidents. • Restrictive geometrics that require left-turning vehicles to slow greatly below the speed of the through traffic. • There is less than decision sight distance at the approach to the intersection. Based on our analysis of the estimated year 2009 baseline and with-project p.m. peak hour traffic volumes at 148th Ave SE/SE 124th Street using .Figure 910-Ba, the volumes do not indicate the need for left4urn channelization (see Attachment B). In addition, the northbound left-turn movement does not have a history of accidents, restrictive geometrics, or a sight distance deficiency based on the analysis presented in the TIA for the Shamrock Plat. Therefore, a northbound left-turn lane is not recommended. If you have any qµestions regarding the information presented in this memo, please call me at 206-498-5897. Transportation Engfneerlng/Operations # Impact Studies # Design Services * Transportation Planning/Forecasting 816 6" Street South• Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 361-7333 • Fax (425) 889-TENW/8369) Q Not to Scale NE 4th St Cl) ~ 0 .c (.J ·c: Cl) -, NE 4th Ct Transportation Engineering Northwest Shamrock Plat ~ <{ $1------- <:t Cl) ~ "' C 0 ...J LEGEND xx ...... PM Peak Hour Trame Volumes Figure 1 2006 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes L 11 -1 r 10 SE 124th St ~ t ( SE 128th St Martin Property King County, Washington 3/20ro6 Q Not to Scale UJ Cl) a: .c ~ ~ Shamrock f}f J Plat .c...._ _____ _ co <:t NE 4th Ct NE 4th St £ 0 .c u ·;:: <I) -, Transportation Engineering Northwest <I) ~ (/) C: 0 ...J LEGEND XX -+-PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 2 2009 Baseline PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes <I) ~ ~ z UJ Cl) <I) ~ .c -CX) <:t ~ L 12 -a ,-11 SE 124th St ~ ti SE 128th St Martin Property King County, Washington 3/20/06 Q Not to Scale -2 3 -. J 0 .i::. (.) ·c: (1) -, NE 4th Ct · NE 4th St Shamrock Plat /}f J <( :51------- 8 .~ t 5 a, .?c U) C: 0 ....J LEGEND XX _. PM Peak Hour Profect Trips Project Trip Distribution % Figure 3 PM Peak Hour Project Q) ~ ~ z L1J Cf) (1) ~ .i::. a5 'St ~ 2 0 ~ ~ 3 _J Transportation Engineering Northwest Trip Distribution & Assignment SE 124th St Martin Property King County, Washington 3/20/06 g Not to Scale NE 4th St Q) ~ 0 -5 ·c Q) -, NE 4th Ct ~ Shamrock Plat /;j ff: <( .c: -CD 'St Q) ~ Cl) C 0 ...I LEGEND XX -+-PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 4 2009 With-Project 18..} 0-+ 17 ~ Q) ~ ~ z UJ en Q) ~ .c: a5 'St ~ Transportation Engineering Northwest PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume L 12 +-0 r 11. SE 124th St SE 128th St Martin Property King County, Washington 3/20/06 Not to Scale NE 4th St Shamrock Plat Proposed connection to be completed with Martin Plat NE 4th Ct Route 1 . Q) ~ 0 .c (.) ·c Q) -, Transportation Engineering Northwest Q) ~ "' C: 0 3' LEGEND .. + Project access route . 3::i Traffic Signal Figure 5 Alternative Access Routes for Project Traffic from NE 4th St/SE 128th St Q) ~ w (J) Q) ~ .c co 'Sf" ~ SE 124th St SE 128th St Martin Property King County, Washington 3/20/05 • • ATTACHMENT A Plat Screening Submittal Comments · Transportation EngJneerlng/Operadons , Impact Studies , Design Services , Transportation P/Jnnlng/Forecasting 816 6• Street SoUUI • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 361-7333 • Fax (425) 889-TENW/8369) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. • • PLAT SCREENING TRANSMITTAL Dtainage: Please addtess the following: a. Off-Site Conveyance: The preHmioary dtainage plan proposes an offsite storm pipe through Lo.t 35 of the adjacent plat of Shamrock; however, the recotded plat for Shamrock does not show a public dtainage easement to allow construction of the prop'!sed storm pipe. Please provide documents indicating that a public drainage easement is available in a suitable location for the off site conveyance of storm water. Since the proposed detention pond on the Martin property does not have a suitable spillway location, the downstream conveyance system and easements must be located and designed to accommodate the 100-year developed overflow from the pond. b. Preliminru;y Drainage Plan: The onsite features map in the downstream analysis submitted with your plat application shows an existing pipe system, which is not depicted on the preliminary drainage plan. Please update the dtainage plan to show any required revisions to the existing pipe system. Based upon the existing mapping, it appea±s that the existing storm pipes and catch basins neat the west property line are designed to collect drainage from the onsite ditches and depression, for uncontrolled discharge to Lots 36 and 37 in Shamrock. The updated drainage plan we are requesting for the Martin application should identify preliminary designs for conveying drainage to an appropriate outlet, with drainage easements for conveyance of offsite flows. Wetlands: Our wetlands biologist, Nick Gillen, has reviewed the wetland study submitted with your application and has visited the site. Based on Mt. Gillen' s analysis, we have concluded the feature on the west boundary of the subject property is not a wetland, because it appears to have been artificially created through the conveyance and discharge of collected stormwater. Therefore, we reco!IlJ:Oend that you revise the proposed plat design and eliminate Tract B. Traffic Analysis: Please provide a limited scope traffic impact analysis to analyze the need for left-tum channeHzation at the intersection of 148., Ave. SE with the plat entrance into the Shamrock plat. Please evaluate under the scenario of build-out of Shamrock, East Renton, Rosemonte and the Aster Park plats. Pedestrian Walkway: We wish to make you aware it appears to us there is a need for a pedestrian walkway from the onsite cul-de-sac bulb to 148th Ave. SE, as contemplated by King County Road Standards Sec. 2.08<;:. We reco!IlJ:Oend you take this into .considetation when preparing a revision to the plat design. TQJ)ogtaphy: Please verify that the topographic contours shown on the plat map set are based upon a field sutVey of the site, and place a note to that effect on the plans. • • ATTACHMENT B Left-furn Lane Analysis at 148th Ave SE/SE 124th Street Transportadon En,Pneerlng/Operadons , Impact Studies , Design Services I Transportation Plannlng/Forecastlng 816 .s• Street South • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Office (206) 361-7333 , Fax (425) 889-TENW(8369) • • IKEY: BelOW' aJN8, ~ storage not ·needed far capacity. >fl /Iba.la curve, fi.uther analyals recommended. 25 20 15 10 5 % Total DHV Turning Left (single turning mowment) (1) DHV is lotal volume from both directions. (2) Speeds are posted speeds. 0 1200 1100 1000 900 800£ 700 600 500 300 ~ ! Left-Turn Storage Guidelines (Two-Lane, Unsignalized) Figure 910-!/.a Design Manual M 22-01 January 2005 Intersections At Grade Page 910-19 • Henoch,Lanny From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: toan nguyen [anandtoan@yahoo.com] Monday, February 20, 2006 12:59 AM Florent, Ray Dye, Pete; Henoch, Lanny Fwd: RE: File# L05P0019 -Martin Subdivision Application Attachments: RE: File# L05P0019 -Martin Subdivision Application Dear Mr. Floren!, • I was very surprised to hear from Mr. Henoch that the Shamrock application has been finalized and recorded. In 2005, I sent several hard and digital letters to you and Mr. steve Van Patten to raise my complaint about the frauds the Camwest Co. committed against me as well as against the governmental systems. In parallel with my letters, I also filed comJ:>laint # 472 on line. I occasionally checked back with you, and recalled you answered as their proposal was under reviewed. I have been patiently waited, and then Mr. Henoch's message to me was both a surprised and a disappointing news. How could you or your department finalized and recorded the Shamrock proposal without resolving my complaint? Did they tell you that they have resolved everything with me? As I see it, if a citizen complaint is not resolved and verified, then the complaint process is not effective. Throughout 2005 I have given Camwest the opportunity to correct the frauds they committed. I have spent thousands of dollars of my own on professional fees. Camwest proposed to reimburse me on their terms plus additional compensation which I disagreed; hence I have never been reimbursed a dime. If they did not commit crimes they would not have to propose like that! Last week I received the tax bill from the King County Treasury, and I noticed the change in property description. I never sold an inch of land to anyone. Camwest and their associated fraudulently filed documents against my land to advance their development. I am not the only victim in this fraud. As I see it, other governmental departments are victims as well. Please review my case again. I am anxious to hear from you. I will be happy to meet with you any time. Sincerely, Andy Phung I Note: forwarded message attached. Yahoo! Mail Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments. MAIN FILE COPY 03/07/2006 • Henoch,Lanny To: loan nguyen Subject: RE: File# L05P0019 -Martin Subdivision Application Mr. Phung: • Pagelof3J F-fL-£ L-~!>?t?t'J/" Regarding your concerns as they pertain to the pending Martin Property subdivision application (L05P0019), please call me on the phone so we can discuss this matter. I can be reached at the phone numbers listed below. Note that I will be at work today and tomorrow, and then on vacation for two weeks, returning to work on 3/7/06. If we don't speak before this Friday, we can talk upon my return. Regarding your concerns as they pertain to the Shamrock subdivision application, it is my understanding that the Shamrock plat has been finaled and recorded. Questions you may have concerning Shamrock should be directed to Ray Floren!. I recommend you call him at 206-296-6790. Lanny Henoch Land Use Services Division King County Department of Development & Environmental Services (206) 296-6632 (Renton}, (206) 205-1453 (Redmond) From: toan nguyen [mailto:anandtoan@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 10:04 PM To: Henoch, Lanny Cc: Floren!, Ray; VanPatten, Steve Subject: RE: File# LOSP0019 -Martin Subdivision Application Dear Mr. Henoch, Pertaining to the above subject, it has been a few months since I sent hard copies of my various documents to you to support my complaint. I did not hear back from you, but hoped that you received what I sent. I would like to know where my complaint stands at this time. Have you had a chance to talk with Messrs. Van Patten and R. Floren! yet? Do you know where my previous other complaint pertaining to the Shamrock Development, which I filed with Messrs. Van Patten & Floren!, stand? Please let me know if you need anything else, or if there is anything else I should do. I am anxious to hear from all of you. Thanks, Andy Phung "Henoch, Lanny" <Lanny.Henoc/1@METROKC.GOV> wrote: Dear Mr. Phung: Thank you for your e-mail below. I will consult with Steve Van Patten and Ray Floren!, as well as others in our department, to determine what our position is regarding your claim. Please submit the following t me so we can properly evaluate this matter: 02/16/2006 r ' • • Page 2 of3 o Identify by legal description the land area which is the subject of your claim and would be affected QY. the proposed Martin ProRfil!y subdivision agplication. • Indicate whether your claim concerning the above-described property is one of fee ownership or easement rights. • Any deeds or other documents which you feel are relevant to this matter. If you have further questions, I can be reached at the phone numbers listed below. Lanny Henoch Planner II King County Land Use Services Division, DDES 206-296-6632 (Renton); 206-205-1453 (Redmond) lannv.henoch@metrokc.gov -----Original Message----- From: toan nguyen [mailto:anandtoan@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 11:56 PM To: Henoch, Lanny Subject: File# LOSP0019 -Martin Subdivision Application Dear Lanny Henoch, Today I received a copy of the Notice of Application pertaining to the Martin Subdivision from your department. I am the owner of lot tax ID # I 023059042 which is diagonally accross from the proposed Martin Subdivision. Since I may not be able to attend future meeting(s) pertaining to the Martin Subdivision, and also because I do have concerns and/or disagreements about the subject matter -therefore I am writing this letter to you. According to the sketch, access to the Martin Development appears to come from three directions: a) froml46 Ave SE, then crosses an easement, or b) from 148 Ave SE, then drives along the easement, or c) from 144 Pl SE, then drive along the easement. The easement mentioned above is access to my lot. This easement was a private easement for four families until late 2002 or early 2003 at which time the Camwest Development Co. used my tax lot number to illegally file various documents such as Quit Claim Deeds, and Real Estate Excise Tax Affidavit in order to become owner of this easment. They even switched the ownership of my lot from my name to theirs. I was lucky to find this out late last year, and have presented this matter to Messrs. S. Van Patten and R. Floren!, City of Renton, King County Dept. of Record, etc, including Camwest Co. Then, recently I learned that the above-mentioned easement was "given" to King County and will become a public right of way. I strongly oppose seeing this dirt-and-gravel easement becoming a public roadway. The Camwest Co. has never consulted with me on the use of this easement. I do not want my private easement becoming a public roadway (which as now I 02/16/2006 • • understand -is a part of Camwest proposal for the Shamrock Development and is partially underway). Summing up my position and/or protest: Page 3 of3 I. I am already contesting the Shamrock Development plan on the improper plan to tum this easement into a public roadway. 2. Consistently, I oppose the proposed Martin Development plan because nothing will prevent future homeowners in both the Shamrock and the Martin Developments from using my private easement. Please let me know if you have any question. Sincerely, An (Andy) Phung Yahoo! FareChase -Search multi11le travel sites in one click. --------------------·--------·--- Yahoo! Mail Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments. 02/16/2006 ®" King County Department of Development and Environmental Services • 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 February 10, 2006 Sara Slatten Cam West Development, Inc. 9720 Northeast 120th Place, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 RE: Request for Additional Information • Proposed Preliminary Plat of the Martin Property, File No. L05P0019 Dear Ms. Slatten: The purpose of this letter is to notify you that, pursuant to the provisions of KCC 20.20.040A, the Land Use Services Division (LUSD) is requesting additional information and/ or studies to complete the review of the above-referenced project. The requested information is described on the enclosed "Plat Screening Transmittal." When submitting the information, please provide a cover letter which lists how each requested item has been addressed. Any clarification or explanation of your submittal should also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division · ATTN: Lanny Henoch, PPM II, Current Planning Section 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 If your submittal is hand delivered, please submit it to the Land Use Counter on the first floor at the address above. Your application has been placed "on hold" as of the date of this letter until such time as you are advised that the information you submit satisfies our request, or 14 days after the date the information is received by this division. If the Division determines that the information is insufficient, we will notify you of any additional information which is needed. Please note that supplemental information requited after the vesting of a complete application does not affect the validity of the vesting of the application. The deadline for the s;,bmittal of the requested information is May 12, 2006. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist which may justify an extension of this date, you may submit MAIN FILE COP \ 6 . jl r Preliminary Plat' for the Ma.Property February"l 0, 2006 Page 2 of2 • such request in writing for consideration by this department. Failure to meet the deadline may be cause for the Department to cancel the application. We request that you subrnit all of the information in one package. If you have any questions regarding the requested information or the subrnittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-6632. Lanny Henoch, PPM II Current Planning Section, LUSD Enclosure cc: Kris Langley, Senior Engineer, Road Services Division, KCDOT, w / encl. Kim Claussen, PPM III, Current Planning Section, LUSD, w / encl. Pete Dye, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD, w/encl. Nick Gillen, Senior Ecologist, Critical Areas Review Section, LUSD, w / encl. r • • PLAT SCREENING TRANSMITTAL 1. Drainage: Please address the following: 2. 3. 4. 5. a. b. Off-Site Conveyance: The preliminary drainage plan proposes an offsite storm pipe through Lot 35 of the adjacent plat of Shamrock; however, the recorded plat for Shamrock does not show a public drainage easement to allow construction of the proposed storm pipe. Please provide documents indicating that a public drainage easement is available in a suitable location for the offsite conveyance of storm water. Since the proposed detention pond on the Martin property does not have a suitable spillway location, the downstream conveyance system and easements must be located and designed to accommodate the 100-year developed overflow from the pond. Preliminary Drainage Plan: The onsite features map in the downstream analysis submitted with your plat application shows an existing pipe system, which is not depicted on the preliminary drainage plan. Please update the drainage plan to show any required revisions to the existing pipe system.· Based upon the existing mapping, it appears that the existing storm pipes and catch basins near the west property line are designed to collect drainage from the onsite ditches and depression, for uncontrolled discharge to Lots 36 and 37 in Shamrock. The updated drainage plan we are requesting for the Martin application should identify preliminary designs for conveying drainage to an appropriate outlet, with drainage easements for conveyance of offsite flows. Wetlands: Our wetlands biologist, Nick Gillen, has reviewed the wetland study submitted with your application and has visited the site. Based on Mr. Gillen's analysis, we have concluded the feature on the west boundary of the subject property is not a wetland, because it appears to have been artificially created through the conveyance and discharge of collected stormwater. Therefore, we recommend that you revise the proposed plat design and eliminate Tract B. Traffic Analysis: Please provide a limited scope traffic impact analysis to analyze the need for left-turn channelization at the intersection of 148'h Ave. SE with the plat entrance into the Shamrock plat. Please evaluate under the scenario of build-out of Shamrock, East Renton, Rosemonte and the Aster Park plats. Pedestrian Walkway: We wish to make you aware it appears to us there is a need for a pedestrian walkway from the onsite cul-de-sac bulb to 148'h Ave. SE, as contemplated by King County Road Standards Sec: 2.0SC. We recommend you take this into consideration when preparing a revision to the plat design. Topography: Please verify that the topographic contours shown on the plat map set are based upon a field survey of the site, and place a note to that effect on the plans. 6. 7. 8. • Power Company Easement: The title report submitted with the plat application inclicates that an easement granted to the Sno.qualmie Falls White River Power Company crosses the site. Please show the location and width of this easement on the plat map. Significant Trees: Pursuant to the requirements of KCC 16.82.156, please submit a "significant tree inventory" of the site, to identify the approximate location of "significant trees" on the property. (Note that a "significant tree" is defined in KCC 21A.06.1167.) In adclition, please submit a conceptual tree preservation plan to show how the requirements ofKCC 16.82.156 will be met. Access: Access to the subject plat is proposed from the north via 146"' Ave. SE, and from the west. The construction of public roads via these two routes will involve crossing a strip of land 16 feet wide, which lies adjacent to the proposed plat. If this 16-foot-wide strip of land is owned by Cam West, please provide documentation to show this. Alternatively, if this strip of land is owned by another landowner, please provide correspondence from that landowner inclicating a ,villingness to deed the requisite property to King County, upon the recorcling of the subject plat, in order to create a public road. Finally, if the ownership of this strip of land is in clispute, please inclicate whether a lawsuit has been filed to resolve this matter. Please provide 15 copies of a revised plat map, and eight copies of any other reports or maps which are submitted. . MSN Hotmail -., . . ' ·- msn1®-· Hotmail® • '' • i I l1 ( ,.> •'(:, •, '< '_,-I I ' ; . ' bsafet@h6tmail.com ,. · ·. ' .·. '. •· .. , ' ,,,. I L',,.,./ 1,,, ~-·-:·,., From: Sent: To: CC: SUbject: Safet Basic <bsafet@hotmail.com> Monday, February 6, 2006 9:52 AM lanny.henoch@metrokc.gov bsafet@hotmail.com urgent reply required re: file # LOSP0019 . ~-~ @ Attachment : 1.htm ( < 0.01 MB), 2.htm ( < O.Ql MB), 3.htm ( < O.Ql MB), 4.htm ( < 0.01 MB), 5.htm ( < 0.01 MB), 6.htm ( <,,, O -~ 0.01 MB), 7.htm ( < 0.01 MB) <; 4 ru ===================================jl=~~N ~ · RE: LOSPOOl9 [fJ~~D!&@~!~I ..o E ·m en Kc. o.o.E.s. ~ .s ~ V Dear Lenny As in my previous communication, I need to reiterate the principal areas where you have failed to address very real.concerns on your assessment of the project at J4gth Avenue, file# LOS POOi 9 . . ~-.. ' •. , .. -~ 1 Firstly, there is a significant and a material failure to address the excessive strained being placed on the limited water system. As you are aware, the sole source of water for this project as well as the recent developments is feed from a main junction point located outside the front entrance to my property. Since installation of the water system to feed the new development, my property has been subject to a number of floods. This has been caused solely by the excessive leakages from the junction.point. 'fl)e cost and the time to clear up the resulting mess is totally unacceptable and should be borne by the party that has contributed to the major failing i.e. an inadequate water system for planned urbanization program. ' Secondly, the access road to the existing developments, which will also feed the new Project at I 4gth A venue and runs alongside the entrance to my property, has been constructed principwly out of temporary tarmac. The temporary nature of the road's construction has created numerous· problems, in particular an increased risk of flooding to my property. j PARTYffi R:ECOR: You will note from attached pictures that the access road to the recent development will also form the access of I 4gth A venue Development, has been so poorly finished without consideration to , \~ effe~ts of water. drainage which also con~ributes to potential flooding risk to my prop:rty. ,-( particular you will note from the last two pictures that a run off trench has been made. Whilst t s · y http:/ !by I I 3fd.bay I I 3.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/getmsg?curmbox=00000000%2d0000%2d0... 2/1 MAIN FILE COPY I ~ I ; ; • ., . j :t; ,J" 11 . ' ·1 :. ·r ., ··r· 1,;j · · · • · ,,:, ,i' r 1;i ··:t·· :1::i,!, //. ,,·.';: ,~, rJi ,'., :,·.,1 ·' "·· , l• I ,' . ;t~l ~·· .. i , • • 10, t,-' • .' 1 J • fi ' ,, "''', ,,•!f/{1,;,,t ·.t.~·~; • '; ' '~;r I• .i , . l.i·,;,,,;, ·~r11;. : ., ; .,!/ 'l .·,'1:1, -·~ ----'>~~.,.-i. -~ .. , .• , ··.~-. ..L: .... "'.""·~~--:-; ~~;"; 7~.-;;;_·,. . ; ,, '" .. ,,1 ' ,, : •.' .i'. ,. r!1·; lw..ri, IL -~fr· ,. ':• ,, ' . '•'I.··. ,1, i:r 111.,11 ,ii\·., .·:1• .. /,.,.•.,: ' •• :ti,': . ' .. ·~ ..... ·,i .. .,. . • .. r-.-~·~ .•. ·--.·.- ) I .,t ·_.,/I:,_., '_.,, ,·fJhct_dff '·: •;;,., · 14.:i,ih, '.:.k.f I ''I ' ·-.,,•· ,. ·,, 'j '',c•IJ'~J 1,1 J Ii I,_ I ,·1, -C:i ;, ·11' ..11', r L __ . MSN Hotinail - '· Page 2 of3 allows. water to run of surface of the road it does along the trench which leads directly into my property. In addition, without natural irrigation through trees and foliage that used to exist in the area, the man -made irrigation is not sufficient enough. This is one of many principle reasons for my property being subjected to excessive flooding. This remains failing on behalf of the Planning Departinent and will need to be rectified. Finally, based on the current plans the new development will be situated on elevated position to my property. It is inevitable that this urbanization will further increase the risk of flooding to my property. If you had visited me, you would have noticed that my property is situated in a depressiim.This means that the elevated new development which will surround my property will create further water run' offs directly in the path of my home. • 1 • ' • • Obviously this will impact on my quality of life in term~ .~f'light, vi~ws .of the. surrounding area · and the position of my house in its overall setting.· In. financial terms, there will be an immediate · reducti.on in the value of my property at no fault of my ·own. Such oppressive developments to existing residents should not be sanctioned without remedy by the County's Planning Department. I have considered this matter fully and in the _absence of any dialogue on the matter I would believe one of the only ways to compensate me would be if my property is to be elevated -at least to the same level-as the proposed development without cost ,to me. The above is only a summary of the principal points that need to be addressed prior to preliminary planning approval being granted. Once again, I· would ask that you visit my property for a --meeting to see for yourself the many issues at hand. You will appreciate that this is an urgent . matter requiring immediate. attention. Accordingly, I request that you reply to this enquiry by email by the 9 February 06. Following oi1f0 • last:Commimication you advised that you had no time to visit the site and see f~r yourself the main issues at hand. Therefore, should this still be the case, please ensure that a 'person within your department who is sufficient empowered· to act is available to meet me in person and ensure that the necessary adjustinents are put in place. http://byl13fd.bayl13.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/getinsg?curmbox=00000000%2d0000%2dO:.. 2/12/06 MSN Hotmail - ., I look forward hearing from you. Safet Basic 12601 148th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059-4806 Reply by email to bsafet@hotmail.com 'BSc,fet- Find just what you're aflEr with the new, more precise MSN Search -try it now! Page 3 of3 http:/ !by l l 3fd.bay 113 .hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/getmsg?curmbox=00000000%2d0000%2d0... 2/12/06 .. \.-, -·----~----------. -------------·-···-·-·-------·---------- Please send me notification of the public hearing and other official notices concerning this application. File No.: L05P0019 -Martin Subdivision I . ( Please print ) :5 ·1> A ,..,1 ro Name: 4 FET orr"'-~ Address: 12 ~Pl l4e~ A-vE SE Telephone No.: 4-PC-2.f:"4-06/ o f\~ \ l'c:frh@J King County has received an application to develop property at the address listed .above. You are receiving this _ · ( notice because our records indicate that you own property within approximately 500 feet of the proposal 0 ---,.,------------ 'ill . ·~, 11': ', S::; .• .. - • e • • I ,, ,, L . ; ,. ·r·-·. ;! •• • :.:; . • • ( Henoch,Lanny From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Safe! Basic [bsafet@hotmail.com] Monday, February 06, 2006 9:52 AM Henoch, Lanny bsafet@hotmail.com urgent reply required re: file# L05P0019 Attachments: 1.htm; 2.htm; 3.htm; 4.htm; 5.htm; 6.htm; 7.htm Dear Lenny RE: L05P0019 • As in my previous communication, I need to reiterate the principal areas where you have failed to address very real concerns on your assessment of the project at 148th Avenue, file# L05P0019. Firstly, there is a significant and a material failure to address the excessive strained being placed on the limited water system. As you are aware, the sole source of water for this project as well as the recent developments is feed from a main junction point located outside the front entrance to my property. Since installation of the water system to feed the new development, my property has been subject to a number of floods. This has been caused solely by the excessive leakages from the junction point. . The cost and the time to clear up the resulting mess is totally unacceptable and should be borne by the party that. has contributed to the major failing i.e. an inadequate water system for planned urbanization program. Secondly, the access road to the existing developments, which will also feed the new Project at 148th Avenue and runs alongside the entrance to my property, has been constructed principally out of temporary tarmac. The temporary nature of the road's construction has created numerous problems, in particular an increased risk of flooding to my property. You will note from attached pictures that the access road to the recent development will also form the access of 148th Avenue Development, has been so poorly finished without consideration to effects of water drainage which also contributes to potential flooding risk to my property. In particular you will note from the last two pictures that a run off trench has been made. Whilst this allows water to run of surface of the road it does along the trench which leads directly into my property. In addition, without natural irrigation through trees and foliage that used to exist in the area, the man - made irrigation is not sufficient enough. This is one of many principle reasons for my property being subjected to excessive flooding. This remains failing on behalf of the Planning Department and will need to be rectified. Finally, based on the current plans the new development will be situated on elevated position to my property. It is inevitable that this urbanization will further increase the risk of flooding to my property. If you had visited me, you would have noticed that my property is situated in a depression. This means that the elevated new development which will surround my property will er te fu er water run offs directly in the path of my home. 02/07/2006 ,· Page 2 of2 • • Obviously this will impact on my quality of life in terms of light, views of the surrounding area and the position of my house in its overall setting. In financial terms, there will be an immediate reduction in the value of my property at no fault of my own. Such oppressive developments to existing residents should not be sanctioned without remedy by the County's Planning Department. I have considered this matter fully and in the absence of any dialogue on the matter I would believe one of the only ways to compensate me would be if my property is to be elevated -at least to the same level -as the proposed development without cost to me. The above ·is only a summary of the principal points that need to be addressed prior to preliminary planning approval being granted. Once again, I would ask that you visit my property for a meeting to see for yourself the many issues at hand. You will appreciate that this is an urgent matter requiring immediate attention. Accordingly, I request that you reply to this enquiry by email by the 9 February 06. Following our last communication you advised that you had no time to visit the site and see for yourself the main issues at hand. Therefore, should this still be the case, please ensure that a person within your department who is sufficient empowered to act is available to meet me in person and ensure that the necessary adjustments are put in place. I look forward hearing from you. Safet Basic 12601 148th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059-4806 Reply by email to bsafet@hotmail.com BSafet --------·-----·------ Find just what you're after with the new, more wecise MSN Search -try it now! 02/07/2006 r ~e!sage • • Page I of 2 c/;fj/ < Henoch,Lanny To: toan nguyen Cc: Floren!, Ray; Dye, Pete; VanPatten, Steve Subject: RE: File # L05P0019 -Martin Subdivision Application Mr. Phung: I'm not sure if my message below was successfully sent to you, so I am sending it again. Also, if you would like to receive future hearing notices on the Martin Subdivision application and a copy of our staff report which we will prepare in the future for the hearing, please send me your name and address and I will add it to our "Party of Record" list for the Martin application. Lanny Henoch · Planner II King County Land Use Services Division, DDES 206-296-6632 (Renton); 206-205-1.453 (Redmond) /anny.henoch@metrokc.gov Dear Mr. Phung: Thank you for your e-mail below. I will consult with Steve Van Patten and Ray Floren!, as well as others in our department, to determine what our position is regarding your claim. Please submit the following to me so we can properly evaluate this matter: • Identify by legal description the land area which is the subject of your claim and would be affected by the P._roposed Martin ProP..ertv subdivision agP._/ication. • Indicate whether your claim concerning the above-described property is one·of fee ownership or easement rights. • Any deeds or other documents which you feel are relevant to this matter. If you have further questions, I can be reached at the phone numbers listed below. Lanny Henoch Planner II King County Land Use Services Division, DDES 206-296-6632 (Renton); 206-205-1453 (Redmond} lannv.henoch@metrokc.gov ----,Original Message----- From: toan nguyen [mailto:anandtoan@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 11:56 PM To: Henoch, Lanny Subject: File # LOSP0019 -Martin Subdivision Application Dear Lanny Henoch, Today I received a copy of the Notice of Application pertaining to the Martin Subdivision from your · department. I am the owner of lot tax ID # I 023059042 which is diagonally accross from the proposed Martin Subdivision. · 11/16/2005 rst-1=- ,· • • Page 2 of2 Since I may not be able to attend future meeting(s) pertaining to the Martin Subdivision, and also because I do have concerns and/or disagreements about the subject matter -therefore I am writing this letter to you. According to the sketch, access to the Martin Development appears to come from three directions: a) froml46 Ave SE, then crosses an easement, or b) from 148 Ave SE,then drives along the easement, or c) from 144 Pl SE, then drive along the easement. The easement mentioned above is access to my lot. This easement was a private easement for four families until late 2002 or early 2003 at which time the· Camwest Development Co. used my tax lot number to illegally file various documents such as Quit Claim Deeds, and Real Estate Excise Tax Affidavit in order to become owner of this easment. They even switched the ownership of iny lot from my name to theirs. I was lucky to find this out late last year, and have presented this matter to Messrs. S. Van Patten a:nd R. Floren! , City of Renton, King County Dept. of Record, etc, including Camwest Co. Then, recently I learned that the above-mentioned easement was "given" to King County and will become a public right of way. I strongly oppose seeing this dirt-and-gravel easement becoming a public roadway. The Camwest Co. has never consulted with me on the use of this easement. I do not want my private easement becoming a public roadway (which as now I understand -is a part of Camwest proposal for ihe Shamrock Development and is partiaBy underway). Summing up my position and/or protest: 1. I am already contesting the Shamrock Development plan on the improper plan to turn this easement into a public roadway. · 2. Consistently, I oppose the proposed Martin Development plan because nothing will prevent future homeowners in both the Shamrock and the Martin Developments from using my private easement. Please let me know if you have any question. Sincerely, An (Andy) Phung -----------------------··---------------- Yahoo! FareChase -Search multiple travel sites in one click. 11/16/2005 • < • • Pagelo~,11 r:r'-~ Henoch,Lanny From: loan nguyen [anandtoan@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 11 :56 PM To: Henoch, Lanny Subject: File# L05P0019 -Martin Subdivision Application Dear Lanny Henoch, Today I received a copy of the Notice of Application pertaining to the Martin Subdivision from your department. I am the owner oflot tax ID # 1023059042 which is diagonally accross from the proposed Martin Subdivision. · Since I may not be able to attend future meeting(s) pertaining to the Martin Subdivision, and also because I do have concerns and/or disagreements about the subject matter -therefore I am writing this letter to you. According to the sketch, access to the Martin Development appears to come from three directions: a) froml46 Ave SE, then crosses an easement, or b) from 148 Ave SE, then drives along the easement, or c) from 144 Pl SE, then drive along the easement. The easement mentioned above is access to my lot. This easement was a private easement for four families until late 2002 or early 2003 at which time the Camwest Development Co. used my tax lot number to illegally file various documents such as Quit Claim Deeds, and Real Estate Excise Tax Affidavit in order to become owner of this easment. They even switched the ownership of my lot from my name to theirs. I was lucky to find this out late last year, and hav_e presented this matter to Messrs. S. Van Patten and R. Floren!, City of Renton, King County Dept. of Record, etc, including Camwest Co. Then, recently I learned that the above-mentioned easement was "given" to King County and will become a public right of way. I strongly oppose seeing this dirt-and-gravel easement becoming a public roadway. The Camwest Co. has never consulted with me on the use of this easement. I do not want my private easement becoming a public roadway (which as now I understand -is a part of Camwest proposal for the Shamrock Development and is partially underway). Summing up my position and/or protest: I. I am already contesting the Shamrock Development plan on the improper plan to tum this easement into a public roadway. 2. Consistently, I oppose the proposed Martin Development plan because nothing will prevent future homeowners in both the Shamrock and the Martin Developments from using my private easement. Please let me know if you have any question. MAII\I \FlllE COPY 11/16/2005 • • Page 2 of2 Sincerely, An (Andy) Phung ·-----··----------- Yahoo! FareChase -Search multiple travel sites in one click. 11/16/2005 • Page I of 'J:;,7-,t::/'. r.:r.'-.E. Henoch,Lanny L..<9S:?PcJ I 7 From: toan nguyen [anandtoan@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 2:44 AM To: Henoch, Lanny Subject: RE: File# L05P0019 -Martin Subdivision Application Dear Lanny Henoch, Thanks for your response. 1. Per your instruction, please add my name, as shown below, to the list of Party Of Record on the Martin Subdivision Proposal. My name: An T. Phung, 9333 57 Ave West, Mukilteo, WA 98275. 2. Pertaining to my previous letter sent to you on the Martin Subdivision Proposal, please be informed that this letter is a continuation of my previous email complaints on the Shamrock Development sent earlier this year to Messrs. Raymond Floren!, Steve Van Patten, and Tim Cheatum. 3. Also, per your instruction, I hereby provide several records and reasons why I complained. A) Proof of ownership of my lot. See attachment 1, Tax Bill. Also, note lot description shown on tax bill. I B) Map, and description of lot together with 2 easements showing my lot is 5.25 acres. (Main lot size 661' x 330' = 218130 sq. ft= 5.076 ac. Short easement.16' x 50' = 800 sq. ft.; long easement 16' W x 631' L = 10096 sq. ft. Total: 218130 + 800 + 10096 = 229026 sq.ft= 5.26 ac. 1 ac = 43560 sq. ft.) Note symbols on map tie the easements to the main lot. See attachment 2 and 3. The reasons why I have been contesting the Camwest Co. are what I believe as frauds committed by Camwest and their associates. The following documents were filed without my signature or approval. C. The Camwest Co. fraudulently switched ownership of my lot from my name to theirs in 2002. See attachment 4,5,6. My contention is: this is fraud. D. Once my lot was in their name, Camwest quit claim the long easement mentioned in "B" above, and gave it to the Shamrock Co. The Shamrock Co. needed this easement in order for CamwesUShamrock team to develop the land the way they wanted. See attachments 7,8,9. My contention herein is: Camwest was never the true owner of the lot, thus their quitclaim was illegal. E. Debra Charles, a person previously unknown to me, used my tax lot account number to quit claim and sold a short easement (mentioned in "B" above) for $6000 to the Camwest Co. See attachments 10, 11, 12. Camwest told me that Debra Charles is the heir of. the original owner who some 70+ years ago divided the.land and sold off all lots. My contention is: If Debra Charles is the true owner, then she has to use her own tax lot account number to quit claim, not mine. The fact is that easement is a part of my property as shown in the map and calculation of lot size. D. The Camwest Co. used my lot together with their other lots in the Shamrock Development as collateral to borrow money from the Bank Of America. The Deed of Trust No. are 2003121200238 and 2001100902309. No attachment herein due to too many pages. Upon my complaint, Camwest has corrected this issue. E. During the development of the Shamrock Proposal, Camwest piled up tons of soil into a long hill along the East side of my lot; and removed a gate belonged to my lot. Upon my complaint, Camwest has acknowledged the issue but took no action to remove the encroaching soil. The have built a fence along the east side of my lot to 1 \ \ separate their property from mine. However, this fence was built on encroaching soil!. \\ Exi1ibit Mo. I (p .f''N \FU\\.\E. c<cril?'1 lism Mo. L~5 fbpJ PAR1Y OF j) . 2 2. . ~ RECORD 11/28/2005 Kinq County Hearing Examiner • • Page 2 of 4 F. To date, I have spent several thousands of dollars on professional service fees in order to protect my interest. have sent copies of my bills to Camwest; they agreed in writing to reimburse but has not yet paid as they had said. G. As I see it, both the Shamrock and Martin Development proposals will allow future homeowners to use my private easement. Fairly speaking, this private.easement was used by only 4 families for several decades. The Camwest Co. does not have the right to turn it into a public road. They never even consulted with me, nor obtained my concurrence to route utilities under the easement. As a matter of fact, in 2000, KCWD 90 anticipated development in this area; they requested and obtained my approval to route water line under this easement. Thanks for your time and consideration. Please help me to look into this matter carefully. I will be happy to meet with you if necessary. An (Andy)T.Phung 425-342-0387 (W) Due to file size, I will send all attachments in 3 batches. "Henocll, Lan11y" <La1111y.He11ocll@Jl1ETROKC.GOV> wrote: Mr. Phung: I'm not sure if my message below was successfully sent to you, so I am sending it again. Also, if you would like to receive future hearing notices on the Martin Subdivision application and a copy of our staff report which we will prepare in the future for the hearing, please send me your name and address and I will add it to our "Party of Record" list for the Martin application. Lanny Henoch Planner II King County Land Use Services Division, DOES 206-296-6632 (Renton); 206-205-1453 (Redmond) lanny_.henoch@metrokc.gov Dear Mr. Phung: Thank you for your e-mail below. I will consult with Steve VanPatten and Ray Floren!, as well as others in our department, to determine what our position is regarding your claim. Please submit the following to me so we can properly evaluate this matter: • Identify by legal description the land area which is the subject of your claim and would be affected QY. the Q[Qf)_Osed Martin Prof)_erty_ subdivision Bf)_f)_/ication. • Indicate whether your claim concerning the above-described property is one of fee ownership or easement rights. • Any deeds or other documents which you feel are relevant to this matter. If you have further questions, I can be reached at the phone numbers listed below. Lanny Henoch Planner II King County Land Use Services Division, DOES 206-296-6632 (Renton); 206-205-1453 (Redmond) fanny_. henoch@metrokc.gov -----Original Message----- From: toan nguyen [mailto:anandtoan@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 11:56 PM 11/28/2005 • • Page 3 of 4 To: Henoch, Lanny Subject: File # LOSP0019 -Martin Subdivision Application Dear Lanny Henoch, Today I received a copy of the Notice of Application pertaining to the Martin Subdivision from your department. I am the owner of lot tax ID # I 023059042 which is diagonally accross from the proposed Martin Subdivision. Since I may not be able to attend future meeting(s) pertaining to the Martin Subdivision, and also because I do have concerns and/or disagreements about the subject matter -therefore I am writing this letter to you. According to the sketch, access to the Martin Development appears to come from three directions: a) from 146 Ave SE, then crosses an easement, or b) from 148 Ave SE, then drives along the easement, or c) from 144 Pl SE, then drive along the easement. The easement mentioned above is access to my lot. This easement was a private easement for four families until late 2002 or early 2003 at which time the Camwest Development Co. used my tax lot number to illegally file various documents such as Quit Claim Deeds, and Real Estate Excise Tax Affidavit in order to become owner of this easment. They even switched the ownership of my lot from my name to theirs. I was lucky to find this out late last year, and have presented this matter to Messrs. S. Van Patten and R. Floren!, City of Renton, King County Dept. of Record, etc, including Camwest Co. Then, recently I learned that the above-mentioned easement was "given" to King County and will become a public right of way. I strongly oppose seeing this dirt-and-gravel easement becoming a public roadway. The Camwest Co. has never consulted with me on the use of this easement. I do not want my private easement becoming a public roadway (which as now I understand -is a part of Camwest proposal for the Shamrock Development and is partially underway). Summing up my position and/or protest: I. I am already contesting the Shamrock Development plan on the improper plan to tum this easement into a public roadway. 2. Consistently, I oppose the proposed Martin Development plan because nothing will prevent future homeowners in both the Shamrock and the Martin Developments from using my private easement. Please let me know if you have any question. Sincerely, 11/28/2005 • • Page 4 of 4 An (Andy) Phung Yahoo! FareChase -Search multiple travel sites in one click. Yahoo! FareChase -Search multiple travel sites in one click. 11/28/2005 • Henoch,Lanny From: toan nguyen [anandtoan@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 2:48 AM To: Henoch,Lanny Here is Batch I of attachments An TPhung Yahoo! FareChase -Search multiple travel sites in one click. 11/28/2005 • Page I of I r • • 2005 real estate tax.txt FILE DELETED King County's email anti-virus software found a message sent to you with the file 2005 real estate tax.EXE attached. Files with the extension FILE FILTER= *.exe are prohibited from entering King County's email system because of potential virus or worm infections. The message, "Unknown", was sent from toan nguyen located at METROKC/DMS/KCIMS. The attached file 2005 real estate tax.EXE was Removed. Your email is safe and this Removed file will not harm your computer. Page 1 I • • Lot Size description.txt FILE DELETED King County's email anti-virus software found a message sent to you with the file Lot Size description.EXE attached. Files with the extension FILE FILTER=. *. exe are prohibited from entering King County's email system because of potential virus or worm infections. The message, "Unknown", was sent from toan nguyen located at METROKC/DMS/KCIMS. The attached file Lot Size description.EXE was Removed. Your email is safe and this Removed file will not harm your computer. Page 1 • • Map of Lot.txt FILE DELETED King County's email anti-virus software found a message sent to you with the file Map of Lot.EXE attached. Files with the extension FILE FILTER= *.exe are prohibited from entering King County's email system because of potential virus or worm infections. The message, "Unknown", was sent from toan nguyen located at METROKC/DMS/KCIMS. The attached file Map of Lot.EXE was Removed. Your email is safe and this Removed file will not harm your computer. Page 1 • • Tax Payer Name Change.txt FILE DELETED King County's email anti-virus software found a message sent to you with the file Tax Payer Name Change.EXE attached. Files with the extension FILE FILTER= *.exe are prohibited from entering King County's email system because of potential virus or worm infections. The message, ·"Unknown", was sent from toan nguyen located at METROKC/DMS/KCIMS. The attached file Tax Payer Name Change.EXE was Removed. Your email is safe and this Removed file wi.11 not harm your computer. Page 1 Message • • Page I of I Henoch,Lanny To: loan nguyen Subject: RE: Martin Subdivision Application Mr. Phung: The County's computer software would not allow me to view or print the four attachments which you sent me with this e-mail. If you want these attachments to be included in the file for the Martin subdivision application, and to be available for our review, you will need to mail me copies of the documents. If you have any questions, I can be reached at the phone numbers listed below. Lanny Henoch Planner II King County Land Use Services Division, DOES 206-296-6632 (Renton); 206-205-1453 (Redmond) /anny:.henoch@metrokc.gov ·····Original Message····· From: toan nguyen [mailto:anandtoan@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 2:48 AM To: Henoch, Lanny Subject: Here is Batch I of attachments An T Phung Yahoo! FareChase · Search multi12Ie travel sites in one click. 11/28/2005 Message • • Page I of I Henoch,Lanny -----------------·------------- To: loan nguyen Subject: RE: Mr. Phung: Like Batch 1 of the attachments, I could not open the attachments sent as part of Batch 2. Therefore, you will need to mail me copies of these documents if you wanted them included in our file on the Martin subdivision application. Lanny Henoch Planner II King County Land Use Services Division, DDES 206-296-6632 (Renton); 206-205-1453 (Redmond) /anny.henoch@metrokc.gov -----Original Message----- From: toan nguyen [mailto:anandtoan@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 2:51 AM To: Henoch, Lanny Subject: Here is Batch 2 of attachments. An T Phung Yahoo! FareChase -Search multiple travel sites in one click. 11/28/2005 I M~ssage • • Page I of I Henoch,Lanny ------------·----------··-----,-w-••-----------·------------------------- To: toan nguyen Subject: RE: complaint can't. Mr. Phung: As expected, I cound not open the attachments sent as part of Batch 3. You will need to mail me copies of these documents as well if you want them included in our file for the Martin subdivision application. Lanny Henoch Planner II King County Land Use Seivices Division, ODES 206-296-6632 (Renton); 206-205-1453 (Redmond} /anny_.henoch@metrokc.gov -----Original Message----- From: toan nguyen [mailto:anandtoan@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 2:54 AM To: Henoch, Lanny Subject: complaint can't. Here is batch 3 of attachments. An T Phung Yahoo! FareChase -Search multi11le travel sites in one click. 11/28/2005 ,· • 12/6/2005 Subject: Martin Subdivision Dear Mr. Henoch, I ~a5 fOOl°( R(e.-Co?~ ~ ~©~~~~ru APR 1 8 2006 [Y KC. D.D.E.S. I am sending to you the following documents to support my claim against the Camwest Company on the Shamrock and Martin Developments. Note that items 5 to 10 were filed between various parties against my property for their own benefit. I view these documents as frauds. 1. Tax bill proving my ownership of tax lot 102305-9042. (I page) 2. Lot description showing lot is 5 .25 acres. ( I page) 3. Map oflot ( 1 page size 11" x 17") 4. My letter to King County and the response from Mr. Phil Sanders. (2 pages) 5. Page showing the Camwest Co. switched ownership ofmy lot to their name. (1 page). 6. Quit Claim Deed El884505 and El 885096. (4 pages) 7. Real Estate Excise tax Affidavit El 885096. (1 page) 8. Quit Claim Deed E2033198. (3 pages) 9. Quit Claim Deed E1939049. (3 pages) 10. Real Estate Excise Tax Affidavit El 939049. (1 page) Total of 18 pages. Note that Messrs. Ray Florent, Steve Van Patten, and Tim Cheatum are aware ofmy claim against Camwest on the Shamrock Development. Please call or email me if there is any question. Sincerely, -A~~ -An T. Phung 425-342-0387 (8 AM -4:30 PM) Exhibit No. ---1al5.t.__ ___ _ Item No. b.S:CP~ I ~ Received '.?> · 2..2· (:)::3: King County Hearing Examiner MAIN FILE COPY SEE REVERSE SIDE ® 2005 KING COUNTY-:-WA. REAL ESTATE TAX PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER @ -.-RM 600-500 FOURTH·AVE, SEATTLE WA 98104-2387 RP10 102305-9042-07 292576A BRING ALL PARTS WHEN PAYING IN PERSON PHUNG AN 9333 57TH AVE W MUKILTEO WA KEEP THIS PORTION 331279 98275 ~~~~i.t/; :;;~-y·-.:.i.:i ·::·t )·. .:s:BLDCK: ~. co·pE .·sEc TWP·.-RG, 10-23-05 9042 6867 10 23 05 N 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 ALSON 16 FT OF S 1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 ALSO N 16 FT OF E 50 FT OF S 1/2 OF . State .... Local School Support .... County_ City_ . Unincorporated/Road .. Port. Fire Sewer &/or Water ... Library ..... Other .. 1,498.05 1,903.07 769-93 1,020-25 141-04 835-50 296-64 Emergency Med Svc .. 12 9 • 12 -~~c~~~-108.95 TOTAL CURRENT srLLING E~10:2:::-:s:s::-::: *OTHER CHARGES NOX WEED SWM 1.95 102.00 Lend Vetue ... Improvements less: Exempt Value . TAXABLE VALUE. Levy Rate. General Tax .. •other Charges ................ . IIJ;Ji!lEUT! 455,000 102,000 557,000 11-83771 6,593.60 ~ _J,08,95 TOTAL CURRENT BILLING L.1.,..;,,b.:i.202~ ... 5:5;, Omitted Taxes __ TOT Al CURRENT BILLING · INCLUDING OMITS... F~''-"J.k*;'·7flP:9;~ VOTER APPROVED 2,207-42 SOIL CON 5.00 First half must be paid or postmarked by April 30. or FULL AMOUNT B~COMES DELINQUENT and accrues -~~ ~ -~-·~ .• DELINQUENCY INFORMATION·:·· -~:t. interest and penalty as prescribed by law. If first half paid by April 30 second half must be paid by October 31 or it becomes delinquent and accrues in.erest ar,o j)e,,alty. YEAR I INTEREST PENALTY l PRINCIPAL I NW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 LESS ETC PROPERTY ADDRESS 12415 148TH AV SE FUU AMOUNT MA V BE PAID APRIL 30th DELINQUENT TOT AL h~·~;) ·-~·· GRAND TOTAL 6,702-55 • • - • f)~::::,-·--·:·.,_. ···,.·-· .. ·:r .. _-. , -----'.:: .. ----_ .-.. -._ ·- ' .(Ol'YIIIGHI BY WASHING!Oh RE\fSIA!EijGISIER -INC. SfAJ.ILf liASHINGION' (206=82-3359. · WASH I NS ION . ES-JAi! REGISTEIH!ELIEYES r INFORMAi. ON BEL6w TO BE COAAElr,: euniou ,.,, ' ITS A!CU!.A!Y. . THIS OR/41l1ION 1$ LEASED FROl'I .Nil/ MINS T Plll!PfRTY OF'IIASHINGTu,, RE.AL ESIATE' . GISTf~. INt. . .... ! . ~ _-.. -- ,4:: .. ; .. . . ~-&!!Wll..f2!1CEL_ LISI· BX· ACtMt.m~LaiUL-----------.:....·---~--------~· ·----------l'llltdlZ-EQUiW' c I l/102305-IH'\.AIIEO .,J(l'l-00. :1unRBUS _Sll~~RESS LQHBLLG;~g s! Y=Ea l.N. ftJi.-osammUif ~!, L~ ___ .. :7oi.R!e'~~'l,~~·~ ' . ' . . .. 'lOlS-08 PIEL£ LEONAAD L 14309 Sf ll51H SI 4342 1 SFD .. 1 7907_2 6 . · k_ zso_ ·_20 .ooo_ 65,800 _ ·a,.aoo 1.0 2010 __ .8! 14309 SE 12HH Sl•IU:NTOH WA 9S05S U-SE-10•2~5 PP Act 39917489 ,wllf .. lm LOf , l!EVI 913.-74 . 1.00 \'-' l<io2fit.00Vf BU) D 12239 148THS£ ----685S 1 SFD 1 731116 23)00 --:'216000 . li,100 60.JOO 1.0 "i61o·;2. PO 00~ 2484•1i!NTON WA 98056 U-Sf•10•23-(JS E 2~ H o, S 172 OI S: 1/2 , '* 1 1fA 6v,,44 .91 .. ----------------·-~--~-------~ . .---~ 0027--06 BA1.l0 1*1f!l 14206 Sf 128TH ST 042 5 SfD I 880416 140 000 68.800 3j ,S00 100.300 1,00 1SS0 36 ro oox 68562•sEATTL£ VA 911188 , . u-u-10-2:s,.os w 112 · , SE 114 o# sw ,,,. o, se 14 us 11!8;30 · · 2.46 I •... '~ozs-os_"_.uii ___ 10N_· SliUAA.· £ ASSot. c __ u Ar_e_ · _,"'_-_11_6 SE·_,_ ,_2~iT·--· 2100_ 6s __ u, ·.-1_ 84 __ 0_201• 79,_2_00_·_··· --•_1_,,eoo __ · ._. sa_ •.• ooo_.-· .. ss~ __ ,:oa_ ·•·_2~_-742 1 . ___ · " , . . 11058 MIN ST sre 100tll£LLEVlf 11A 98004 ;, U-SV-10-2:HIS H 110 FT Of S 360 FT o, ·S, ,,~ o, II IYII _629.99 · .,ll : !jo29,-04 TiFFANl ASSOCIATES IP« soo IJ810N,AY ;a .. 2ioo"""iii"-, p21129 4il ooo· 'i:14'800 467 000501,600 .. ,. . ·,c I · -'1177 HMu!IHGTON"Ai'E rt:·130S•RENTON 11A 98051 U-S\l-10-2J-0S S 65 T o, N 694 #r Of w:!Of FT Of Ml 114 s~:'.!19 .40 i . · ..... ••-: . ' . ' . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . -_'.. . . ---. . . ' ,. _·-. --., . 9030;91 f/.e~~'3oo Cln CA 94062 12207-l4~TH AV SE u-'11!1ol2i~8s 51112 01 N 112 OF NE°ll;\81'200 $E~hl0fu· 11~~/;~S 1~5!4' ..... 'I Q031,-00 PR£5SLEY ;AVID, s . . ' . 6855 1 901 . 140329 eo 000· ·r~i 800 . ··. . 0 55.lioo· .·. . 1240! 143T_H S£~NT~:Wl-9l!056 _ _ 1 _ . _ . U-SE~I0-2!:(15 N 1/2 o,·,. 114 o# Sf 1/f.O#. · .SE 1/4 L£~ 643,0~ 3,72 ' '1032--09-rmiTON,EASJ . ' 13808 set 128TH st -2145 1 901 ·~12, 000. 0 12S 000 .·· _,.ecn~ £Alli. E.•81 RAl'flEII Pl~E•NCIERSOHrlSl:.Mt WA 98_303 u-sw-10-2~, E 1/2 _OF Sf 1/4 DI' sr 1/fOI : SW 1/4 LES' f4'3.51 4 .• 52 -----·.----.. , .... -· .... ' -.. ------' -. ·,-. ·---, ---·---.. ~ ~-. -J~~-~~'W,~=~i \IA 9805S · :D!1o!zt2A, PP Acrmh,91 f.OYfE ft/l!200 L!l~0,~v, 7't!~~ l.-~ · . )io34--07 G n ASSOCIATES O : 2145 I 901 790402 z,g··,ooo :6il.too O 68.700 . . I . .r ,., l115 10~m A: ,..~LL~~ .. 98004 . IHW-10-2~5 S 1/2 Of t,t 1/ _jf "·t:.2' _ SI! 1/ 3YII 77!1.-~7 -~ ! , .. ·. ~ 3~,a~arl ~T~IIRITOH VA 981156 . . ~itl1o!2~5 PP _ACT }9911505 ... IL£ .;N•5 00 £ u~~, 5 rw,, 4~50. . .•. ,~a11~l~\2:J~~~~NTm4-IIA 98055 1~012 st-126fH·s, --~H~1ol2~; 11i1/47a1'i~!!2·~1-~11~~P·000 sw'f,r:&, 1~~~,:~-31~4 ~---· • W~7~t1Tff:ffl,Jf:-'~':9!liS6 4526 NE[ 4TH sr Jl~1o!2~, 51290.4 fT·Of E 1SO Ff cit:'e;,n o,4~~~¥7,. 1YY~~il;,!l8 ?2:8s'6 qo3a;.o_i«ocH;Olfi:~•PAi'~_1t1~i --_. -_12605 148TH SE . 6855 j.~f,D_-_ 1 _ 84_ 0_72S _· 67.,0oo_·_-_._.· '._Y1_1·,s_oo_·: .42,500 54_.;'000 :· :_,,_es_e.fsoo_-·_36 .. 1?605.148Tlf l!Vf.~ftf!E~!)N If/I 9~(156 . . . t U-$f,,.10,:2JtCJ5 N 107 g OF S 196 ff:Of;,£"' ,~ fT OF ~ 1/2 0 ~;!)6:"'' l29· • • 90391 ~52t~~x;tt ~ 98168 14430 s!'f 1281" u!fi!10!2~, w't,iarit .111 48,~Ri 1,iri,,00 SE V,rfes ~ffl~;;o 2~36 .,_ -_··_:··_ --_ ---··-·--_-:·_--~_·-··· -_-___ .. :, .. -.~--_---· __ -_ -·----:· _---.......,.. ____ _ . •1904<Hl9 lll!iiliE JNIES-i . . . 6155 ; 901. . 770316 !li,ooo ,o:"t.1,· 800 . 0. 61,800 . : i~6Q+J56JH."YE·s~,RENT~,!!,\ 98P5S. . . ; . U"$f~!ll-'.2~"95 E 112 PF 5!11/4Q SE 1/..~:o : ~E 1/4_LE~. 782,28. 4,52 .. ~~ .... -.~-' ... ,~~-' ._, -·· -~---·-··· . ~'"!". ---~~--~~~ _,, ~--· ,9041 t2t;m01ffl~lNT(!N IIA:98()55, •.. 1~412 .~~( '2.~',~-,.::~ ,, . _,1t:61l~1Q].2g8_t E 1112_0, .. W,1/2 C!F, SI!_ 1/4,:a1·:~ SE~hi!>S, •. tt,i,l1 : 5 ,,L ~~-~---~~-'.?f_,{ __ ~r;;.~:~ .. '.''''. 1' ~i H-· .. ·.· • ~~~~:':::;1::e~:t~J:'~'.1 ~: ::~~:"~ ,~ .. L _ :: :·,_. ~~:?~~~( ~~ __ .;::::~~'-, : f _ ;_; .:; .. ,.:~~;:; .. 0.9:. ,~;::::. ,_ < ::_,:,:· :: :Jt::_ ;.· .. ;-:· ", ii _;:,_: p • • Juno E-mail on the Web Pagel of2 IJJ.UN.O .Y Junalchanne1sl5hapfltte1+y AceounlE-mall on the weij · You are signed in as: antphung@juno.com Sign Out .,....,... .. ---:--,-. .,.,..,, T ._.=-c_,. . .,--.• ,. -'--,r-, f .--,,.,. ...,. ... -.. -..-J--,-. -....] -j\~~ .. :t-,-w-;-·Mr.-. -··-~,mo-"--.,..,.,, ·M•~"?."!"·i•· lnbox J;l4il-· ' Ail~Booic ~ Options I Help Chock for neW mail ~ lnbox ui Sent [;.] Trash (Empty/ Lid Draft Search the Web 'i• ,. ;. ;' '•"' r1;:?:' · Upgrade to'., ' ' I "' '<1/ri'l ·p1a1inum~ • ' • ' • ~ :.._ •r. 1 ,, :. Ssv~ ~~~~ft~.!~.!.•) ~ply ... ~~ly AIJW · Forward l Ooloto ! Fron,; 'Sanders. Phil' <PhlLSandersCIMETROKC.GOV> To: ••antphungOJuno.com•• <antphung· OJunO.com> SubJoct: Property Tax Account Numbar 102305904207 Date: Wed; 19 Mar 2003 07:58:22 -oeoo Return-Path: < PhiLSanders@METROKC.GOV> !Put In Folder.; . .!.)Previous Next I Received: from mxOl.lax~unt;.d.com (mxOl.lax.untd~com. [l0.130.24.61]) by m8.nyc.untd.com with SMTP id AAA9H'I'E34ARF'5NVJ for <antphung@juno.com> (sender <Phil.Sanders@METROKC.GOV>J; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 10:55:42 -0500 (EST) Received; from keyimc.metr-okc.gov (k~yirnc.metrokc.gov ll.46.129.1'77. by mxOl. lax. untd. com with SMTP id AAA9HTE33A64GS7J for <antphung@juno.com> (sender <PhiLSanders@M.ETROKC.GOV> J; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 07:56:41 -0800 (PST) Rec.eived: by KEYIMC with internet Mai,l Service (5.5 .. 2653.19) id <FNBllGSS>; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 07:56:24 -0800 Message-ID: <A42FC8B073D6D311807FOOBOSFA7EOE20E9A69BB@kcmail2.metrokc From: "Sanders, Phil" <Phil.Sanders@METROKC.GOV> To: • • antphung@juno.com• • · <antphung@juno.com> Cc: "Holmes, Garry• <Garry.Holmes@METROKC.GQV> Subject: Property Tax Account Number 102305904207 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 07:56:22 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.191 content-Type: multipait/illternative; boundary=" s··· ~=-NextPart_OOl_OlC2EE3 Q .• l68AEFOO" Your account was changed inlo Cainwest Development b.ecause they filed a Real Estate E Tax Affidavit on May 13, 2002, inslructing us to mail all tax statements to them. tam sendi a copy of the affidavit and a subsequent affidavit filed on February 13. 2003, again filed by · Camwest putting the property li11o Shamrock Highlands LLC. After you review these affidavits, I suggest you contact Camwest and ask them to correct tt documents to reflect the correcnax account number. I will have the name and address chi back to your name and a new 2003 statement will he mailed to you within the next week to days. Phil Sanders Property Tax Supervisor King County Treasury Operations ···'·Original Message····· http://webmailb.juno.com/webmail/D082A I 4B/S'?posilion= I &msgNum=7 I &fol<ler=lnbox,... 3/19/2003 • • Juno E-mail on the Web From: antphung@juno.com [maillo:antphung@juno.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 5:15 PM To: garry.holmes@metrokc.gov Cc: phil.sanders@metrokc.gov Subject: Page 2 of2 On "03/18/2003" at '05:15PM": A customer comment from An T Phung was posted from the. County webpage http://webapp.metrokc.gov/KCTaxinfo/ and mailed to garry.holmes@metrokc.gov Subject: Comment Type: Question Email Address: antphung@juno.com Hi I was looking for my 2003 property tax bill and I could riot find it. I browsed your web site ar found an astonishing error as shown below. I have no idea how it happened. My name: An T Phung Current Address: 9333· 57 Ave West, Mukilteo, Wa 98275 I own a lot in King County since 1987. The tax Acct.# is: 102305904207, Why is the owner of the lot is CAMWEST DEVELOPMENT INC? Camwest did offer to buy from me, but I have never sold it to them or anyone else. I would like to hear from you. Plet1 le. send your response to my email address: antphung@juno.com Thank you. An T Phung An email response has been requested. Savo A~~~!•!_•.•l Reply ~~~!~ A_u Forword Delete ! !Put in Folder... i:]Previous Next I : .:·:·, 1· ,:, , . :r,-.. •UNITED ~0 •'III I My SIM Page I Channels \ St1opphig I Suppo1'1"1 My Accoimt I COrporate I .Join Now Abpul ur, l Products 8, Sol'l/ic::es I Advet11so1s t D1s!ritiulion ! lnvostors I Press I Priyacy Statomnnt ! Terms ol Service http://webmailb.juno.com/webmail/D082A I 4B/8?position= I &msgNum=7 I &folder=lnbox, ... 3/19/2003 • • King County Dept. of Finance, Treasury Operations -Property Tax Information Tax Account Number 102305904207 (This account is active.) Tax Payer Name CAMWEST DEVELOPMENT INC 2N9999 Annual Statement Requested by Amou.nt Due: $2,210.44 . Parcel Number 1023059042 Malling Address 9720 NE 120TH PL UNIT 100 KIRKLAND WA 98034 First half amount if paid by April 30, 2003. It is not necessary to have a tax.statement .to make your payment. Please write the account number on your check and make it payable to and rnail it to: King County Treasury 500 4th Ave, #600 Seattle, WA 98104 If the mailing name or address is incorrect and you want to make a change, please click on the following link: TaxJnfof~Q If you would like an official printed tax statement !lli!l[!!.QJQ_the majling address lis!e{laboye, .click on the REQUEST PRINTED TAX STATEMENT button. ··.·. :R. ~OEST PRINliED:il:_· AX:_STAr!iMENT ; .. · . '. '''I . •.· .. ,, • ...... -' ... ___ .,,,,. .. .... ,_,. ·• '~ . :-~·-< 2003 Tax Information Tax Amount: $ 4,311.9~ Other Information FEES Land Value: $ 190.00( SURFACE WATER $ 91.4: lmorovement Value: Si 161.00< SWMBOND $10.5'. . Status: . Taxabl1 · NOXIOUS WEE1 $1.95 Lew Code: '686'. CONSERVATION $ 5.0r ··~; Total Billed: $ 4.420.88 Paid: $0.00 Interest: $ o.or Penaltv: $0.00 Amount Due: $ 2 210.44 2002 Tax Information Tax Amount: $4,032.7, Other Information FEES Land Value:1 $ 180,00( I Page I of 3 http://webapp.metrokc.gov/KCTaxinfo/taxinfo.asp?parcel_id= I 02305904207 &submit I =Se... 3/18/2003 _,;_....·-----''------------ L,~, ~t1,r ,:f (/c,,A. • WHEN RECORDED MAILTO Kantor Taylor McCarthy & Bntzmann, 1501 4th Avenue, Swte 1610 Seattle, WA 98101-1662 Attn Joe McCarthy • PAOii ees OF ,12 QUIT CLAIM DEED Grantor: The Morris Edelman Trust, Grantee: Legal Deacdptlon: CamWest Development, Inc -+/ Ptn SE 1/4, SE 1/4, Sec 10, T 23N, R 5E /:2.JJ.- Tax Account Number. Related Documents: R,,n ,J '@3305 qfff~ I023oS-C1D47-vo 'JA:Z001..t70CRO ffD None The Morns Edelman Trust, for and m cons1derat1on of Ten Dollars and other good and valuable consideration m hand pa.id, hereby convey and qu1tclaun to CamWest Development, Inc , a Washington corporation, all of 1ta nght, title and interest m the following descnbed real property, situated m Kmg County, Washington The North 16 feet of the South Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Townib1p 23 North, Range 5 East, W M DATED the / q"fl+ day of lrJ*-1 /..._, , 2002 The Morris Edelman Trust -'*'*-'Re -~C:we,\ -io Co«ec.+ "\IA,)' ~le\ l,jl,U'Y\~v--** By Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Trustee :g. By ~~:'.'ff:6&--uru Natnervmi delman, Trustee FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF TRANSNATION TITLE INS•JRANCE CO AS A MISCELLANEOUS ACCOMMODATION ONLY By~.~£,_) Name Herbert Gramger, Trustee Page 1 of3 • • Quit Claim Deed {continued) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss COUNTY OF >ltN fiW.c,/5Co ) . On Jypt)i.., .;i b , 2002 personally appeared I-~Htiltr "6,~1,,./ ,..,/ Joh" ,M WNU, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to the person whose name 1s subscnbed to the wtthm instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same m his/her authonzed capacity, and that by his/her signature on the mstrument, the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument - @ TEDDYWU ' _ Comm1H1on f 1S05871 Notary Pubhc-Ca\lfomla _ Sen Franc:iaco County r MyComm E,q))Te11Jun2Z,20Dlf STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) , ) 88 PnntName E NOTARY PUB-"L"1""c'",-n-an'-d,'fo,"-r~t"h-e""S,-ta-tc-e-o"'f"'C"'a""1t7fomta My comm1ss1on expires ~loLf\Q. ?:l:; ?:::DP.S COUNTY OF ""'11<...e.sco ) On ~ I i , 2002 personally appeared lrvmg E Edelman, proved to me on the basis of eahsfactory evidence to the person whose name JS subacnbed to the wtthm mstrument and acknowledged to me that he/ftbt executed the same in his/her authonzed capacity. and that by his/her 8lgnature on the instrument, the entity upon behalfofwh1ch the person acted, executed the instrument ~ e s s s e s ~o~y';.,J e e J -· CommissLOnf1305671 i Notary PUb11c. ~ Cahfom1a f San Franc:isco County f My Coffm 0q,tl'ea Jun 72,. 2005 P -- ~~_:.No~vJLI NOTARY PUBLIC man<! for the State of Cabfom1a My comm1ssion expires ., Wjg. ,._ ~, ~ ,2 Page2 of3 • • Qi.ut Claim Deed (continued) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) . DL/.)ss COUN O ~) onWQJ. a.a f!.-0 , 2002 personally appeared Herbert Gramger. proved to me on the basis of sabsfacto:ry evidence to the person whose name 1s subscnbed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/!Jkk executed the same m lus/lj¢ authonzed capacity, and that by hls/ber signature on the mstru , the enhty upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the° ll'lstrument • K.FISHER COMM t 127890$ NOTARY PUBLIC -CALIFORNIA SAN MATEO COUNTY Mt Comm EMpn:a OCT OI, 20114 . --- ---Sq;nature of No Print Name NOTARY PUBLIC m and for the SJate of~orrua My comm1ss1on expires \Q ... h :J,O_ • Page 3 of3 ..n = • Return Address KANTOR TAYLOR MCCARTHY & BRITZMANN 1501 4TH AVE #1610 SEATTLE, WA 98101 ATTN JOE MCCARTHY • 111111111111111 2002 13 01 02 TR~SNAT1DN Tl QCD 13 II PAG 881 OF 995 85/ 3/2882 12:113 KING COUNTY, WA •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Document Tolle(s) (or transactoons contained therein) / 1 QCD ~ 12)~ ~ \'\A. "'Z-oo-z..ttx:,o 1-1 ~ 4 .........••...........••......••••....................................... , Reference Number{s) of Documents assigned or released (on Page of documents(s)l •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Grantor(a) 1 MORRIS EDELMAN TRUST 2 _ ... RE-RECORD TO CORRECT TAX PARCEL NUMBER .. , .. 3 4 Addrtoonal names on page of document •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Grantees(s) CAMWEST DEVELOPMENT INC Said document(s) were filed for record by Commonwealth land Tille as accommodation only. It has nol been examined as to proper execution or as to ,ts effect upon title. AddrtJonal names on page of document •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Lega1 descnpt1on (abbreviated 1 e lot, block, plat or sectton, township, range) NE 1/4 SE 1/4 SE 1/4 STR 10-23-5 AddrtJonal legal 1s on pages 2 of document •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Asaassor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number 102305 9042 Addrbonal parcels are on page of document ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1 The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the 1nformat1on provided on the form The staff will not read the document to venfy the accuracy or completeness of the 1ndex1ng 1nformabon provided herein •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• E1885096 1t,Aa6zeez 12,zs "f1t)( OUNTY, WA SALE fl·:: Washington State County Auditor/Recorder's Indexing Form (Cover Sh881) PAGE 081 OF "81 ' f), 2oO 2.0D I.PO w A ... r • ~(~E~E REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT p~J~ 1 ' 1 ' _.tA•'i ,•: ~!_"A .. (\,'LR·;N'-1. CIIAl'Tt:R 112 45 RCW-( IIAPTI:R 4S8·bl Wll( I h11, tonn •~ your re1,.e1pt when ~t.unpeti by 1.J\h1er " •• "~-FURU'>tATCOUtHYlklA\URIM,O!Hll l\ls!{~orrn No S4-0001 ll for Rcportm11 Transfcu ofControU1ng lnterel>t of Entity Ownership lo the Ocp.utment of Revenue) .. TIii\ AFFIDAVIT WILL NOT BF ACC'F.PTED UNLF!\.'oi AU Ak.EAS 1-1 AR[ FUI IV COMPLF1£D .:.:..._ --:--:·---------------------- :· Nanie /~'-::t:f?RRIS EJ?~_LMAN TRUST-----CAMWEST DEVELOPMENT, INC, --------------------- -,.~/0 ~Ji~is !4RG9: BA~, N.A. '\i~eet 44-0 }'lONTGOMER'l~!U} FLOOR ···---\irr~,E2_0 NE 120~!_1 PL~ #100 ( ''Y"~~:~.-/ sA~tF:RAN¢'1sco, CA 94104 { 11y/St.11Lu1 11 . KIRK~~.¥.A 98034 ':,(\~~;·,, [;)\I Ni~ Al I ;:IU W1.i.t '(,I(;·:•;';· ~:I~ 11 Wll.ltl \l'tlNl: N( I Al. I-, ... ~-,-A-Rc-1.1 ;J_M_HI_" . r """"' ...... " "O • .. ,, A\\l\'1UVAIUI II IAXIXlMPI lNam1. sAfl~ ... ~:S ~kj~.{ · .. ~.~ -/--\.,.~-/-PTN OF 102305:9_0_4_2__ __ __ _ __ ",treel _________ ---. --.,------. __ ___ ___ __ C.1tylState/L1p --··.~--J·-::· :.: ,, ::' ~,. /":/ .:: 'f' -----_-__ -::::::::::::: ----a l U,AI m·\t RIPTION Or.PROl'l:KTY S1TlJA r1 [} 11'1/ Q UNINCORP0RATfD tOUNTY QOK IN C'IIVO~ --·---__ . ..._ .:· :· ..... { ·,,, ',':. ;; - ',1ree1 Addre~, (1f properly 1~ 1mp10~1;.~l . _ 7._• __ -_-__ .:'' ··' ~---------____ -------------- / THE NORTH 16 FEET OF THE souh l'/2 OP Tall\,t· 1/i+ OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTi,_ Ri.NGE'\ id.sTJ w.~. •:(." .. -1,-,-h-,s-pr;-,-"-,-,-,-11~~-,a-,-,,---------cVc~c·:~-rcNc(>c.--'-.•.s.0",-,-c,-,"pe-:lfo)~,1-.1·;:~~)~.11 prop.cny 1m.l~dcd m gro~s ~cllmg prn .. c, both '··;~ .:·l.1ng1ble (cg,,forn11{Jrc, t,-l(u1~~en1, eh .. ) or mt.1ng1blc (eg, guodY.Lll, l l.i~,iticd or Uc~1gn.illf\1 ,1, lorc,t l.tnd'I l hJptcr IN 33 KCW .. · ,, .. D ~ ::·.agt,1:cmcnt n.l,1 tu ,cOmpt:Le, ct<.'·) ··,.,.... ,. .,. l l.c.,ificd J~ 1..uncnt.J,e l~~h • .vpen ~race, fum Jnd .1gr11..ultur.1I. or _limber)'/ C~lt:r 84 34 Kl W I i,;cmpl lrom pro1ir1y t»:._,~s a no'~rofit org.u111.ttmn" Ch.~'ptcr 8,{j:t,. Rt'w':'. ',elh:r, Lxempt'H.eg ~ll j__ _:_:_ __ RcLe1\mg ~pc.,;i~l ul1,1~1rnn j, h1~tJm D D K D prupcn) 1 l h4p11..r K4;·"26 R(_:W _.:: Property Type J;i'i.and:,1~~ly / /. O l.ll1d with new bu1ldmg 0 lID<l v.ith pfl..viou,.l} lll,t.d.:bu1ld111!i ,8'1.\fld with mobile home D Um her on~,} .:· .,· :· / O hUH~mg only Prme1pal Use ····,.O A1~;···:(14.{~mt) ,._,/ S re~,d~:nu.tl Dumber 'I~. ,tgr1Luhur,1l ,,/ / ., .. d\omn~r1,.1.1l/mdustnal 0 oLhcr ·:.. / ::· .,· :-' D'"ti) NO 11t i. 01 C't>;l~~·c; (~c. ~7;4=,,:: _ _.:";,=_~:c,R;:~c,~e,-.;84= .. :J=_.~=>==-I 11 lhe nlw ov.ncr(,) ol l,md thJt 1, ~-J~\ll~1=d qi dc!>!J;lh~i:d as current\1sc 11r lore,1 l.tnd ,,1,h 10 o..onunuc 1h1.. d..1!>S1li2,n'ion or-Od1gn.1t1Q0'-0I sudi land lhe nlv. uwm:r(!>) mu.~t ,,gn bel~~ .... II the n~i i\>me~~5 do}ot d.~su':/ ·· to ton\1nue ,u1..h d~\1fi1...ttwn or de\lg:1:ldlHm, .i._lf 1..ompcn)aung !lt; .. :: .:· .idJ1twn..il l.1x 0...11!..ul.ttei.l purm,ml 10 Rl'W,~·j3 11.0 .ind' 140 or RC'W 84 14 108 ~hJli he due .1nd p.iyJb1e b) lhc \elkr or:\r.imi~rur at the t1mi' ol ~"'1,... l'hc u,unty J~>c,sur mu.,t dctennmc 11 the fand tt:i,oi.fo~red .. 4uJhtic, tu wntmue cl.ts,ilk.itmn or de~1gnatmn Jnd mu~\ so 111411..ahf ·.'·::.\,,/''".,,,,_ 1t~,~~;~,,~~ ... 1.i,t;~e~r'"i':~tW):r{um~r 4J e*i>l•n•t•un WAC No :t-'>.~f .... u~) ~58=~1-~/~0,_,_/_-• __ .~------- l:.xpl.tn.ttmn ~R-~-~EC05J}·-''rP~O_B.MCJ!:{N{__~~gL ___ _ ·•·-G I . 4S •. type ol 1l0Lum1..nt ·· .. Qu'J;i c4~D __ _ L>,1le ol LloLllmLnt AP~·];r;;' l,",~, i002 --~ 7 ., (,ru\\ ",dhng Pru .. c ··s: .. ,( __ _ -0- Pcrsnn.il l'rnpo..rl) {dedu1..t) ~-.. I .ti,;Jhlo.. <.,dling Pno..e $ IK~l)e I.ix ",t.tl!.. s - l,00..,11 s l>ehnqu1..nt lnlctl,I "itJle s I 01..Jl s Udmquenl Pen.iii) s I utJI Dul s_ . , .. -·-i-- AFI-IDAVIT below ",1gndlUrc~ d.i nuL ne1.1....,~,1.nly mcdfl the land ~JI remain/I\ · dai,~1h1.Jhon or dcMgn.t11on II 11 nu longer qu.ihf\e,, ,f:w.1.lUlll''~em~ved and the: Lllnl[ll.n\Jtmg I.ix~\ v.111 be ,ipphcd All new owner~ muM l,'.1gn llm IJnd Qdoc, 0 docs nnl qualify for cunhnu.uLce .. , /ce~.iiy tjiidcr l'c1Mlt).uf.l'el)ury Um.let l'hc I .tw~ ol l'ho.. ',t.ilt: ul WulllngtOn I h·.tt4he I o~~l'l~ h I rue And LurTC\.l ( ",o..c bJdr. p.igc: ol th1~ fort'\) .:· .. .. ·' ,. Date ----o-,-,-.. ,-V-M\~SSOR .: .¢::~:T~/b~}.r~~-i:"':l):~::::..JR~-·~:-7,1:..:::::===::..---c (2) NU I (CC Of' <.OMPLIANCr ((.1taptcr 84 26 RCW) ~~ (pri:~t) -~_ .... ___ --~,w,;' AGENT ~ 6~ If the ntw owner(s) of property with special valuatmn as historio.. propeny wish to LOnt1111.11:: this special valuation lhe new owner(s) must sign below II the ntw owner(~) do not desire to continue such SJ1Cc1al valuation, a.II add1\lonal Wll 1..alculated pursuant lo Chapter 84 26 RCW, shtdl be due and p.tyablc by the seller or lransferor al the ume of !.Ble (3) OWNER(S) SIGNATURE p,,,..,. ''"""" • ""' r '·'·1·· m· 111111 lhan "" ''"'· o, by 11 fme (RCW 9A 20 021 REV'40001•(l·l8-99) 1 096 D""ri~-Pl...,olSS~m~ Ii~.,~ BfIIij'.'Tlg IT' ~~:*'~,"-~>' ~-···-~ Nam,(pnnt) CH;;;;;;URTI~ A9fof fu,-,r,.'}~~:•· D,i,& Ploc, ofS,grung •'•-= t,/\,;· ••' ,lltutm::7.i:um tcnti orn()i mote "\, -:,. \,000 00), or by bo1~\m~i50~~t ~ .,· C6uNT'v T.RE4uRo' I0/13/Z ... "~t· "1N~ COUNTY , ,. , .. .i. • ... PAG6 ea\ OF 19\ • ' ' • • • • • WHENRECORDEDMAIL TO JOSEPH P MCCARTHY KANTOR TAYLOR MCCARTHY P C 15014'" AVENUE, SUITE 1610 SEA'JTLE, WA 98101-1662 llllll!f lJIIII SHAMROCK QCD 2• •• PAG&:001 OF 082 • "" 041/Z,/2084 12 48 KING COUNTY, LIA QUIT CLAIM DEED Grantor: DEBORAH J CHARLES Grantee: SHAMROCK HIGHLANDS, LLC Legal Description: Ptn SE 1/4, SE 1/4, Sec 10, T 23N, R 5E Tax Account No.: \02-505 90.1.\-2-. Related Documents: None DEBORAH J CHARLES, an 1DdtV1dual, for and ID cons1derallon of Ten Dollars ($10 00) and other good and valuable cons1derallon ID hand patd, hereby convey and qmtclatm to SHAMROCK HIGHLANDS, LLC, a Wash1Dgton hrmted habthty company, all of her nght, tttle and 1Dterest ID the follow1Dg descnbed real property, situated ID KIDg County, Wash1Dgton The North 16 feet of the East 50 feet of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter ofSecllon 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W1llamette Mend1an QU!TCLAJM DEED (The remainder ofthzs page 1s left blank mtentlonally) E2033198 04/23/2894 12'48 KING COUNTY LIA TAX $108 80 SALE se,eea ea PAGE001 OF 081 I " i • • • • • GRANTOR'S S1GNATVRB PAGE Jl'OR QVJT CLAIM DEED ST A TE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF ~!!.B ) ) ss ) I certify that I know or have sattsfactory evidence that DEBORAH J CHARLES 1s the person who appeared before me and said person acknowledged that she signed this mstrument and acknowledged 1t to be her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned m the instrument DATED . ,f-f,-o~ Prmt~~dz~-cC Res1dmg at 8eatz?N My appomttnent exp1Tes L/-,;L70~ QUITCLAIM DEED SJGNA TURE PAGE • • • • • Pl}~SE i.PE QlrP.~NT REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT This fonn ts your rcceLpt when stamped by cashier CIIAPTER 82 45 RCW-CIIAPTER4S8-61 WAC ,.':: FOR Use AT COUl'ITY 'TREAsURl!R'S 0FflCS (Use Fonn No 84-0001 B for Reporting Tt11.nsfen ofContro\ling Interest of Enllty Ownership to the Department of Revenue) .. THIS AFFlDAVIT WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ALL AREAS 1-7 ARE FULL V COMPLrflD Na~:· Deb-irab f"Charles J72<5 I 9,-tt, ME NW 4'bll] ·,-AriDRess·To s!.).No AL.i PRoiiER:ri TAX REi:A:rno coRREsraN.l.)r.NcE Name Sb:amrO:Ck uighlaPd{ LLC···•-. ··-· .:· i .. ,; ,.. :. Street ckl'6imW¢St s72~NE:i2olh:'.J>1ac¢ #ioo C11y/S1<1tc/Z1p K1ik1an'd, ~ashfug1~fi' 980;4~> Name Shamrock Hlsblands LLC street cfoCamWcst9720NE120 111 Placc #lOO C1ty/State/Z1p K1rk:)agd Wasbmgton 98034 ALL TAXPARCIILNUMDERS COUNTY TREASUR.l:R PU.Cl! ASSESSED VALUE IP TAX EXEMPT /02-305 '!D't2.. ~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION 6~tR~;~~~;i~1f~T~l~i~ UN~J°,~:~ll'ED ~ COUNTY OR ~ IN CITY OF eR,aen!!11S!!Q!!n _____ _ Street Address {if property 1! tmpro~~) .. ,,~' -..'-" --.~'--,~· --+.i·---,,'-'~, ------------------------- The North 16 feet of the East sO' ~cct odhe ~~th n.8\f or..riil}f~rth.iest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Rang,f S East, W1Uamet;if: M~rid1Qii ls this property currently ;: YES/ ,'NO 181 " [ii Classified or designated as forest land? · ... Q: Chapter 84 33 RCW Classified as current use land (open space, fann D and agricultural, or t1mber)? Chapter 84 34 RCW Exempt from propcrttlli,u1s a nooprofil D orgamzauon? Chaptq' 84 ~6 . .RCW 181 Seller's Exempt Reg' No ~ Rece1vmg special .i~Tuatlon as h:(stonc property') Chaptcf84 26.R_CW ·· .. 0 181 l'rOJICrty Type [8] l~d onl{ ._\ :i Descnpt10:n ofpe,,onJi'l property included tn gross selling price, both ta11w.ble (c·g, furnitilri!, equipment, etc) or mtangtble (eg, goodw11l, ~re~cn91ot .\o·<;~inpete, etc ) iicxempt1o~di:1mcl hwW'/\l'.h>,umber and ~,;planat1on ~ic\~o." cs~i~su.~; / '\ ,,. ···:, · . .1;:xplan,11iio~.'; ·,·'I'· ~~~~··~f ~Lurry~~' //lpj;··rr:·· Ql6 Mf ' TfllS 1S MY TA-~ wr- J::P . -A~ •. t.rP~? 0 1:md with prev1.ously U$Cd building:: 0 umber only _/ ·' ·· ,, Prmc1p.d Use a··/ Apt.)~+ unfi; D land with new bu1[dmg D land with mobile home D bu1ldmg only Date ofDci·<!+en~/ _:" ... ·-~> 4/:,'f_,. __ ¢Lf: Grosi:_seil;~;·Pnce/ sj_)~·-_j~;:"' ,_. QQ~Ol('.02__ ___ _::~~--- Personal Prop&ty;.(d<tluct:{ 5'_' -'---~-------181 res1dent1al 0 umber : agntu!turaf D other ·· · ·' .,,,B ci:,,mmcrcial/mdustnal ( l) NOTI<i.e OF cONiTNUAJkF. (RC\!{. 84 3:foR RCW 84 34) If the new ownei{s}. of land that 1{C1J~1fltq.(jj. designiucd as current use or forest Jami wtsh fufontmuc \lih c~~s1ficit1on:Or de.~1gnat1g.rt?f such lam.I, the new owner(s)'·rnll:Sl-Stgl\ b~ow _Uthe l)ew owncr(,s) do MJ desire 10 rontmuc such class1ficat1on or de!i1gno.hon, 1ill con'l~satmg or ·· adt.lmvna! tax calculated pursuant tO .. RC\'{._8f3J qci .'*1d 140 or RCW 84 34 I 08 shall be due and payable ~y the 'Si:ller o(tftfusfcr~f'af.~.hc tin,ie of sale The county assessor must def~nrune 1fthc''la.nd trap'sferro;I qua!1fics to contmue class1ficat10n or dt:~1gna11c-h anti muir: so mdiCittC below Signatures do not neccssanly mciirt tit~· land:.W11l t'~m m .,., cla.,s1ficanon or design:mon If 11 no longer quahfiQ, 11 Will b,e removed· and the compcnsatmg taxes will be applied All ne~ owni:rs·hi~.st SIW\:· This land D docs D docs not qualify for conl't!!_uance ,./ D;itc -------DEPun' ASSESSOR (2) NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE (Chaplcr 84 26 RCW) ·;._ Taxable Selling°:pn~·~ /S_~·'~l~4 .. ,~ao""~o,L ______ _ Excise Tax }i,te_:i S,--.c..Jl~::r..,_.~ ... '-------- Local \$.~;,:_· ------------ Delinquent Interest State $ ____________ _ Local s ____________ _ Delinquent Penalty $ ____________ _ Total Due $ ____________ _ A MINIMUM OF $2 00 TS DUE AS A PROCESSING FEE AND TAX AFFJDAVIT J C~tfy !J~d~·.fcnalty of PctJUTY Under The Law& of The State of Washinglbn Thaf·The Foregoing Is True And Correct (See back ofth1s fr)./ ./ .:(.,.,,·····.··:. ~ ..... ,,..., ,,,;t ~· ~ ·Gn~lor(;1',ie~.1'~ :.. . .. . • Name (ptmt) ::ocljbf;:: O~~~ ~d Pl~-~ o~;;;; l,e 6., y, lftht ni:w owner(s) of property with special v11luat1on all h1stone pro~sfy) wish 10 contmue this special valuation the new owner(s) must sign below·: !fthcncwownet(s)donotdes1rctocontmuesuchspec1alvaluatmn,all ·:, .. : :· ·· :: ,. :: .:· § ....... ,. :~~1~~;.~~1~b;~~~u!:lfir~~\::~!~0 ~:i~!rt~~c2!r~~~· shall be due ·~1gri~reir .-/ {:J~'.· ./ : .. /'·'' '·;,'. .. Graniio.lAacnr:->.:"-· A : · ~ ··:: (J) OWNER(S) SIGNATURE Name(pnnt)/ .·&~ ~/\~ Date and P\11c~··o'f:~Jgl1fg/j/ :;r.fi,le.nJ PcrJury PerJury 1s a class C felonywh1ch ts punishable by 1mpnsonmcnt 1n lhe stale correctional ~1or{for J~,~n,\e~ of~ot more\ than five years, or by a fine man amount fixed by the coun of not more than five thousand dollars (SS,000 00), or by''bOt)l nnprisom:tiCh't-:and :: finc(RCW9A20020 IC '· ·:. ,, . .. :°' REV 84 0001 a (J·l8·99) (PD 08-01-0l) ,· ,..' PAGEllll1 OP' Ni )' ;; • WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO 11111111 IIIIIIIIIH 20030213002662 Kantor Taylor McCarthy & Br,tzmann, P C 1501 4th Avenue, Suite 1610 CAMWEST QCD 21 10 Seattle, WA 98101-1662 PAGE Ill OF 102 1211312013 u se KING COUNTV, WA Attn Joe McCarthy QUIT CLAIM DEED Grantor. CarnWest Development, Inc, Grantee: Shamrock H1ghlands, LLC Legal Description: Ptn SE 1/4, SE 1/4, Sec. 10, T 23N, R SE Tax Account Number: l oz 30:>-qoq;i_ Related Documents: None CamWest Development, Inc , for and m considerat10n of Ten Dollars and other good and valuable cons1derat10n m hand paid, hereby conveys and qu1tcla1ms to Shamrock Highlands, LLC; a Washington !united hab1hty company, all of its nght, title and mterest in the following described real property, situated m Kmg County, Washmgton The North 16 feet of the South Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Secllon 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W M DATED the .Jlj+h day of January, 2003 CamWest Development, Inc a Washington Corporation By~,~~ Nam~pbl Its Pres1dent E1939049 02fu\3/ZH3 14'56 kfAx COUNTY, w~ 08 SALE le ee Page 1 of2 PAGE 001 OF 001 • • Quit Claim Deed (cantmued) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Enc Campbell 1s the person who appeared before me and said person acknowledged that he/ she signed this mstrument, on oath stated that he/ she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged 1t as the President of CamWest Development. Inc to be the free and voluntary act such party far the uses and purposes mentioned m the instrument Signature of Notary · Pnnt Name _____\d i.;,o('< ';;, ~-c..><... NOTARY PUBLIC m and for the State of Washmgton Res1dmg at £'iu..rn:>"', My commission expires Page 2 of 2 ---------------- • REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX AFFID-This form 1s your receipt .. .. CHAPTER R2 45 RC'W-CHAPTER 458-61 WAC when stmnped by cashier . :: Fok Use AlCOUNTYTRf.AW.R~R.'~OFflCE (lJs~:'f'orm No 84..QOOI B for Rcportmg Transfers of C'on!rolhng Interest of Entity Ownership to the Department o/ Revenue) / THJS AFPIDAVlT WILL NOT DE ,'CCEJ>iEO UNLESS ALL AREAS 1-7 ARE FULLY COMPI.ETED Narnc -~,,_~C~-~~m~W-"c,.e~·\~t~D~·~,,-f~~l~o~~'f.m~•~•~.t~.~l~~-~C_;.,;.--~,:'--- Strcet ---·-·:·.~·9·~7s20o;:c-N~E,.,..i~2~0-"~r.,1c~hc~,-it,~1~oo;o'..,· ,__ __ ,,.,.··''_·"'--- N•~--~S~h~a~m,,.,ro~c~k..,,H~•g0 h..,,laun~d~s4,~L~l.~C~------- <;1rcc1 ___ 9~7u2~0,..cNuE'-'l~2~0·_•~p~\~a~c~c~, #rr.,_IO~Oe_ ______ _ C1ty/Slate/Z1p Kirkland, WA 98034 ALL TAX PARCEL NUMBER~ COUNTY 'rltfASURl,.R Pl AC~ ASSE<;!>l:D VAi UE: rrTAX t-J,.C.\-IPI II , , GAL Dt SC'RIP 110N oF:~RO~~·RTv,Ji·~·rnlrn~)·~-:;·.~~ UNIN~.RPd~ ¢o_K=m~•~----COUN1 y O OR IN cnv m ----- ••• L' -~. ':,ucet Alhhc~s (1f property 1s 1mprovC~l,,,NµcMc',.__-'-----!'"' --'---..-"-""--------------------------- The North 16 feet of the South Half:~f thi°Northcast.'"Cjil!."f~cr .(;'f the Southeitst Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 E~jt, '}i'M : .,· ·· ·· Is this property currently Classified or designated as forest land? Chapter 84 33 RCW Classified as current usc;:lJmd (open space, farm .:ind agm:ultural, or 11m,6er)".J::haptcr 84 34 RCW E11empl from propcny\ax as -~\,_(!nprofit orgam1at1on'> Chapter 84 36 RCW D D ., Seller's Exempt R.e'g No ::. - Rccc1v1ng special ,;alua119~\1s h1s1di-1e O l!1 prnper1y? Chapt.ef84 26,."kCW ·· Propcr1) Type !Bl 1Jd only/ !! i 0 \.ind with prcv16u~ly l!.iicd bu!ldmg -i 0 11111ber only · Pr1nc1pal Use tJ Apt.i(~+ unii) 0 t11nbcr :'O .igri'C:µ11uJl 0 other __ · ··:,,,,• 0 land with new bu1Jd1ng 0 land with mobile home 0 building only .g·rcsic1en11al 0 co~~rc1aUmdustnal (l) NoT1cE6F. CONTINUANGE(RQW s4 n QR Rew S4 34) lfthe new owncr(s) ohaod th~H'~· cla~s1ficti"ord~·s1gnJied as-·ci.:ttre11t use or forest land wish to continue the cHiss1fitat1on~'~rdcs'1gndlion of S~h land, the new owncr(s) must sign bciow lf.th~.~ew ~~r{s) do nol ~<:sire to continue such class1ficat1on or dcS:ignat1cin~··alJ cotnpcnsa.tmg-Or ·.: <1dd1t1on<1! la.,; calculated pursuant to R,.CW 84 l3 liO:ii.nd 14<1 or'R.cw.: 84 l4 I 08 $hall be due and payable b/l!lc sellcr.,ci'r tr:insfe~'6r at ilie..t1riie ol sale The county assessor must detcni.\'inc,.,if't\lc laild tra;ilsfcrred ·:,,; qualifies to continue classification or designation anii mu~t so md1catc below Signatures do not necessanly mean the !and ·~11l r'emaln. m .. ctass1fication or des1gnat1on /f11 no longer quallfies';·.1t will be rl:,pov~ and the compensating taxes will be applied All new ify..,iers mu,(s1g"D Tots l,md O does O does not qualify for conun:~fltlf'",:' ;· Date ______ _ DEPUTY ASSESSOR (2) NOTICE OF COMPLlANCE (Chapter 84 26 RCW) lfthc new owncr(s) of property wtth special valuauon as htstonc property wish to cont,nue this special valuation the new owner(s) must sign below If the new owner(s) do not desire to continue such special valuation, all ,u!d1t1on,il ta.K calculated pursuant to Chapter 84 26 RCW, shall be due and p<1yablc by the seller or transferor at the tune of sale (3) OWNl<:R(S) SIGNATURE D.plcrilpt1on::o(pt1'1i,ori~I property rnc1uded m gross selhng pncc, both l_~g1bf~..(cg", fu.rii.11i.i~c, equipment, etc) or mtang1blc (cg, goodv.tll, _,agrecmc!n:!:;!'Ol}b colnpete, etc) &,-";, r :If exemnn'on/CJa1ry:iCd, l1s1. V:fAC ~~mb',i.r an.~{e,q~,inauon ~~(!·No (§ec/S~b),./~58'~i1"::f76 :. .~ / Explanat10:ri· .. ?§an{fer J>:ffilj;mb~f to/LL~(os cap1tal1zat1on IRc'.Section-·'121 / Tyve of Document ··::Qu 1 .1~~, .. ,lt,'.'." ... · : .. ~:;_.-~d __ _./ Date of Document--'--·•.,,..,....,.__.,.. ___________ _ Gross Selling Price'.$'.-'---"---------- Personal Property (deduct) $_>_:,.. ____________ _ Taxable Selhng Pnce $ ____________ _ E)mse TaK State $ _____________ _ Local s ____________ _ Dchnquent Jn1eresf State $ _____________ _ Local $ ____________ _ Delinquent Penalty $ ____________ _ Total Due S, ___ _..'-"Q"--------- .::~ M!_iu~1~M.9r s::i oo 1s DUE AS A 1>Roci;s:,1No me AND I AX tn the state corrccuonal 1ns11tuhon ford max,m~~.iirm of;~ot ~ore~/ ll1 five thousand dollars ($5,000 00), or by both 1mPnso~cn1.~nd · Pi:IC:E ee1 OF Hl rvK 11<.t!A~URER'S USE ONLY r r -~:(7~~~,{~:,"0-'.:~:~,~---~ --~·~~---·-h·, '(i-. ' ~ ·-;;::-" .. ,• ' • i,/: I. ~,4c. e ~I ·I !I~ Ill !II I') • /t::'9..3_ z7 • k,Ac..· 8· ' (,1J) t 2.00 I I ~ ~ ·Iii I), ' \ "1 I ~ o·<:fo,A~-~ . -@ ~ 20o " ); 50 1292.e+ 1 , .4-t:,/lc. Q ~ 322.84 --@ j 3>7.Z.7 ---~ -I Io, z.7 ,e.15 ~ ~ -----·-- ,tJ, .~ ,., ~ Q <) ' ' ., ~ I ' ,,_'o')µ-.· I I) r-cfil I~ i "' ~ . o.fo ... c .. ~o ~/ ~ €&/. +2 ' I PHUN·~ S LC>1 TAX /'.-GGT -c11 102. :io5 _ q 04.2 I \ i / \ ' , c· ,,4,e. .5.Z-· ., N) °' Ill I I'<) .. __ __ ~ ,o ,; ,! ·, :ti' ~~ ~ ~ .. I) ' ~ \: ,.#Ac.-1 ~ L_ 2-7?.•5 ~~ ~ \J \/ii\.. Ill '< ~ 50 1eo --·-·--~---· $9,+. ZS /'/ _ t:: G/. 2 2 /:", ___ N. OB::. -er'-4+7----.. ·y/ ~~ z /-~~ I G3/.2 ------:,:. z /&.' .,,... · ~r r '*-----------~--'. ,,,,.. . ( ,,;,· - ;, --,i ,4-,e. ® \, I ~ _OT 2 LOT 3 ./ I '904/20866 rP ~· I, @) I-'· ,;I, \•' (~9 ___ .,/ .• ~II} , ... f..;,~Af.1,. C!.Y:" C\I . 180 '\J' .~., .. _,_t!;;!."~ -~··----'>' ..... --t' 111-'-:330. 49 /J'..1. ,rs p) ~ .,, " ~.., ~ ... •. Ill . ") I\ ,j . c'.:;;J,'' ~J' ~-:.;;~!~; ":-i •,?\.,.',\{: "At ~. i/.·n .,.., 1:-:.fi . -; ' . ~... ,.. ti'-·--,,,, ,, I I') ~ ' '>·'' i-~-""'' ,. ,--~-, ,, f ~Jllj' 1 ;~::~,;;'.' :lti·, r'' 'ar )' 1 , I ti,. (/'.g'~ ~~:!~-4.fr. •.t~~""---·~·-r=··-·-··. -··--,-_; ~-,;;--:_;;; --... /(I.?') ·------r I .. ' 12<> ~ ~ ~ .. r/20 i " .. J,,.c.. "' 'I-. ' -W> f--,__ ~ 110--1---- "' b 'l I 53A~-~I-•• 3-~ '· o'(§) , /BO . .SO .~ I~ 120 "' ~ AC· 'b· . z5 /'.'.ri) I ~ 0 C\J ....: -"l 1. •' r ,. • Henoch,Lanny From: Keith and Cathy Gilbert [kcccgilbert@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 3:49 PM To: Henoch, Lanny Subject: L05P0019 Dear Mr. Henoch, • Pagel of~ Fft-.£ j,. ()~j>PIJ I '1 We have adjoining property to the Martin Subdivision (we're the house at 12609 148th Ave SE) and wondered what we could do to hook up to the sewer system that will serve that new subdivision. We are on a 13+ year old septic system and would rather pay to hook up to sewer tha11 to rebuild the drainfield. Any information you can give us about this would be very much appreciated. I can be reached during the day at 206-768-7000 ext 212 or you can just reply to this e-mail. Thank you in advance for your help. Cathy Gilbert and Keith Gilbert Yahoo! Music Unlimited -Access over I million songs. Try it free. 11/29/2005 PARlYOF RECORD ·i, • • Page I of2 Henoch,Lanny From: Keith and Cathy Gilbert [kcccgilbert@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 7:40 AM To: Henoch, Lanny Subject: RE: L05P0019 Lanny-- thank you for the information. We will follow up with either the City or the developer to find out the timeline and costs. We appreciate your help. Cathy "Henoch, Lanny" <Lanny.Henoch@,METROKC.GOV> wrote: Mr. and Mrs. Gilbert: Regarding your inquiry below, I have two recommendations. Since the City of Renton is the sewer purveyor for sewer service to the proposed Martin Property subdivision, I recommend you contact the public works department of the City to inquire as to what steps must be taken for you to receive sewer service, and what the City fees will be. If they indicate that an additional sewer trunk line must be built before you can receive service, and they anticipate CamWest, the developer of the Martin Property subdivision, will be constructing such a line, I recommend you contact CamWest to get their estimate on when they expect to construct a line. CamWest can be reached at 425-825-1955. If you have other questions you think I can help you with, please call me at the phone numbers listed below. If you would like to be added to our "Party-of-Record" (POR) list for the Martin Property subdivision application, please call me or send me an e-mail with your mailing address. If you are added to the POR list, you will then receive any further public notices sent out on the application, a copy of our staff report which will be mailed out prior to the public hearing on this subdivision application, and a copy of the Hearing Examiner's report and decision after the hearing has been completed. Lanny Henoch Planner II King County Land Use Services Division, DOES 206-296-6632 (Renton); 206-205-1453 (Redmond) lanny.henoch@metrokc.gov -----Original Message----- From: Keith and Cathy Gilbert [mailto:kcccgilbert@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 3:49 PM To: Henoch, Lanny Subject: LOSP0019 Dear Mr. Henoch, Exhibit No . .-2~?..._ __ _ Item No. LC>Spo~ Received ':> '2..2-~:t_ King County Hearing Examiner We have adjoining property to the Martin Subdivision (we're the house at 12609 148th Ave SE) and wondered what we could do to hook up to the sewer system that will serve that new subdivision. We are on a 13+ year old septic system and would rather pay to hook up to sewer than to rebuild the drainfield. Any information you can give us about this would be very much appreciated. I can be reached during the day at 206-768-7000 ext 212 or you can just reply to this e-mail. 11/29/2005 r ., • Thank you in advance for your help. Cathy Gilbert and Keith Gilbert Yahoo! Music Unlimited -Access over I million songs. Tr)' it free. Yahoo! Music Unlimited -Access over I million songs. Try it free. 11/29/2005 ' • Page 2 of2 r • • Henoch,Lanny From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Safet Basic [bsafet@hotmail.com] Monday, November 21, 2005 12:28 AM Henoch,Lanny bsafet@hotmail.com L05P0019 Importance: High Dear Lanny • Page 1 oflc4 F:rt..£ LPS'?~e>/i!J This email is the response to the Notice of Application dated November 9, File number L05P0019- Martin Subdivision. I would need some further information in regard to this project. I have been·trying to get information for number of months now, I am getting nowhere. My address is 12601, 148TH Ave, SE which clearly indicates the way I am affected by all these changes. They are number of questions I need an urgent answer to. Primarily, what will be happening to the side and front of the garden? Obviously as it stands, the pedestrian part will be taking a lot of my front garden. How will you go about it -needless to mention my concern that you will be taking my land? What compensation parameters have you got in place? I wrote already number of letters complaining about the noise and vibrations I have experienced. By the nature of this project this will only continue and I am very concerned about all the further damage you may cause to the property and surrounded land. I would also need a contact details for the person I can talk to in case I decide to built an additional property at the back of the existing house. This is also of a great urgency to me. I am sure you would agree that the above is of a great importance considering the direct impact this have on my property and life and as such I am sure you will provide me with all necessary details to enable me fully understand your proposals on basis of which I will decide how to handle this matter further. Many thanks for your assistance and I look forward receiving your reply direct to bsafet@hotmail.com. BSafet Download toda)"s top songs at MSN Music from artists like U2, Eminem, & Kelly Clarkson 11/29/2005 Message • • Page 1 of2 Henoch,Lanny ___ ,. ___ ,. ___ .. _-_ .. ,. _________________________________ _ To: Safet Basic Subject: RE: L05P0019 Sir or Madam:· I am unable to respond to your inquiry below, because, in part, I don't have sufficient information regarding your questions. Please call me at the following phone numbers and I will see if I can help you. I can be reached at the Renton phone number on Tuesdays and Fridays, and the Redmond phone number on Wednesdays and Thursdays (see below). Lanny Henoch Planner II King County Land Use Services Division, DOES 206-296-6632 (Renton); 206-205-1453 (Redmond) lanny_.henoch@metrokc.gov -----Original Message----- From: Safet Basic [mailto:bsafet@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 12:28 AM To: Henoch, Lanny Cc: bsafet@hotmail.com Subject: LOSP0019 Importance: High Dear Lanny Exhibit No . ..J2=<!.l ---- Item No. L..~'S POI::) l'j: Received ~ • 2.2 ~ O'"!t:: King County Hearing Examiner This email is the response to the Notice of Application dated November 9, File number L05P0019- Martin Subdivision. I would need some further information in regard to this project. I have been trying to get information for number of months now, I am getting nowhere. My address is 12601, 148TH Ave, SE which clearly indicates the way I am affected by all these changes. They are number of questions I need an urgent answer to. Primarily, what will be happening to the side and front of the garden? Obviously as it stands, the pedestrian part will be taking a lot ofmy front garden. How will you go about it -needless to mention my concern that you will be taking my land? What compensation parameters have you got in place? I wrote already number of letters complaining about the noise and vibrations I have experienced. By the nature of this project this will only continue and I am very concerned about all the further damage you may cause to the property and surrounded land. I would also need a contact details for the person I can talk to in case I decide to built an additional property at the back.of the existing house. This is also of a great urgency to me. I am sure you would agree that the above is of a great importance considering the direct impact this have on my property and life and as such I am sure you will provide me with all necessary details to enable me fully understand your proposals on basis of which I will decide how to handle this matter further. Many thanks for your assistance and I look forward receiving your reply direct to bsafet@hotmail.com. 11/29/2005 ~-------------·----------- Message • • .. BSafet ·------------------------------------ Download today's toll songs at MSN Music from artists like U-2., Eminem, & Kell:r. Clarkson 11/29/2005 ---' Page 2 of2 -• . .. · ..•............ · REQUEST FOR King Cou,ity SCHOOL INFO.RMATION PRELIMINARY PLATS Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton. WA 98055-1219 · DATE: October 31 2005 ffej&@&DW&!n) TO: FM: Issaquah School District ,~ f, / Kim Claussen, Program/Project Manager Ill '{j7 · Nov I 2 2005 t.0 KING COUNTY RE: Proposed Short Subdivision LUSD File No: L05P0019 -Martin Property Subdivision The Land Use Services Division (LUSD) has received an application for a subdivision in your District. Enclosed is a copy of the (revised) plat map received by the Land Use Services Division on. September 28. 2005. In order for us to adequately evaluate this proposal, provide the most accurate information to the public, and for LUSD to serve the School District better, please provide us with the following information: Which schools do you anti · ate the students living in this subdivision would attend? If the students will be bussed, where do you anticipate the bus stops will be located? If that information is not available at this time, currently, where are the closest bus stops located to this site? Elementary_--=.tTYJ_;___/-L-"'f_/:t~------'-------- Jr. High/Middle _ _!!.tfYlL..!_'--L._u._--.,,-,-------------- Please complete this form and ret rn it by October 28. 200 the address below. If you have questions regarding this proposal, please call Kim Claussen at 206-296-7167. Thank you very much. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATTN: Lanny Henoch / Program/Project Manager II 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Ex/Jibit No. --=-\ _,_\--:---- Item No. Lh'f>P Qt:) J ~ Received Z> ..-z 2,. <;::;,~ King County Hearing Examiner i I® King county Department of Development and Environmental Services OAK-DE-0100 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 -~,lie I ~"- i , " C ~.' ~~,/ (1·1 ,, -09 r.:,:-, 200 S' ---- .,.·r· . .,-. ,., .... -:. ~·1..., ...... 1'1 ·;!~fil7t: C . :z ::~·~ rn:.-· z ;j _,(--· p:r."; r-~ (r. ~~ . ' ;._ j . ..:_~ ;.=_: (- .·a~ r·..._"'; C'. ·cPLN/CR -:;;;c::,:.7.: .. -i :2 i ·3 i}! j, 1l!i ),iL;11}; I,!;! i,111li1 l i ,i; 11iii I I,! i,i ,,i,l 111! i!il 1 £·•--::.-, --~, ... - • ··-® • King County Department Of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Land Use Services Division Permit Fee Estimate Application Estimate Number: L05P0019 Permit Title: Martin Property Permit Type: Preliminary Plat Applicant: CamWest Development -. • Date: l 0/20/2005 Estimated Maximum Hours: 257 Total Fees: $37,934.13 The following disclaimers are attached and are part of the fee estimate for this permit. The applicant is required to submit a signed copy of this form with the application and fee payment acknowledging that the applicant has read the disclaimers stated below. Disclaimer Applicants are responsible for all fixed fees, reported hours performed in reviewing submittal materials and processing, up to the fee estimate. Changes in the scope of the project review will result in a revised review fee estimate. Fee estimates are based on information submitted to DOES by the applicant prior to linalization of the permit application. In addition, estimates are determined by utilizing historical data gathered from projects of similar type, size, and scope. The fee estimate will be the maximum fee charged unless the scope of the project changes. Should fewer hours be required to complete the review, then the applicant may receive a refund for those hours. If items are identified that are not originally disclosed or identified later in the process, a new estimate may be required. Applicants will be responsible for any additional hours identified in a new estimate because of: 1) Changes in the project and unknown or undisclosed site issues 2) Incomplete information or errors in applicant submittal 3) County code fee changes 4) Incomplete information from applicant 5) Errors in applicant information or submittal 6) County code fee changes 7) Appeals & public hearing(s) ' 8) Excessive Citizen inquiries, questions, etc. 9) Environmental Impact Statement l 0) Additional Review for documents not provided with the initial submittal: a) King County Road Variance application b) Surface Water Design Adjustment, etc. Keeping review fees at or below the fee estimate will depend on the applicant's commitment to complete the process review. Acknowledged: ~~ Applicant/Owner Name (signature) Date /0/ Z It, I {)5"" SMA' S}J[TT&J Applicant/Owner Name (print) MAIN FILE COPY r • ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Sen1lces 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 • Wednesday, October 26, 2005 Activity Number: L05P0019 Project Number: L05POO I 9 CIIAR(a:s Description Project Mngmt Hrs Budget TRS Hourly Fee: Land Use Planning Bldg FireFiow Review TRS Hourly Fee: Engineering Plan Review Counter Service Fees TRS Hourly Fee: Critical area review SUBTOTAL: PAYMENTS Description Check Check Transfer To A05PM371 SUBTOTAL: CHANGE GIVEN: BALANCE DUE: • FEE RECEIPT Applicant: CAMWEST DEVELOPMENT, INC. SARA SLATTEN 9720 NE 120TH PLACE, SUITE JOO 98034 KIRKLAND, WA 425-825-1955 Checklog Check # Payee Checklog Check # Payee 11595 CAMWEST DEVELOPMENT, INC. I 1625 CAMWEST DEVELOPMENT, INC. Transfer To Date Entered Date Entered 09/28/2005 10/26/2005 09/29/2005 Amount $37,239.30 $811.45 $211.31 $43.47 $483.00 $543.38 $39,331.91 Amount ($ I 8,474.75) ($18,967.07) $392.44 ($37,049.38) SO.OD $2,282.53 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the Information provided to DOES at the time of application. ODES permit fees were restructured effective March 4th, 1999. Many fees previously assessed a flat fee, now are assessed as hourly charges. Because of this change, and to ensure that our customers secure permits as quickly as possible, permits may be Issued prior to all hourly charges being recorded Into our billing system. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate In affect at the time of service, and wlll be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit Issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DDES Issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.0. Printed on: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 at 2:37:52 PM Page I ofi. I.____ ® • King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 October 20, 2005 Sara Slatten Cam West Development 9720 NE 1201h Place, Suite I 00 Kirkland, WA 98034 • RE: Permit Fee Estimate -Proposed Preliminary Plat of Martin Property FileNumber: L05P0019 Dear Ms. Slatten: Beginning January 2, 2004, our office implemented a new program for managing certain types of permit applications to provide customers with an enhanced level of customer service. The Project Manager Program seeks to provide customers with increased predictability for the permit process and better accountability from County review staff. For pem1it applications using the Project Manager Program, a project manager is assigned to the permit to facilitate communication with the applicant and provide a fee estimate to cover the anticipated scope of review. The project manager will also monitor and manage the permit application throughout the review process to ensure that review schedules remain in line with perfonnancc standards and the overall work hours are within the range of estimated fees for the project. Your application was received by our office on September 28, 2005. The enclosed information provides a summary of the fee estimate for the anticipated work disciplines and also discusses the submittal process and disclaimers which may affect the final permit fees. Once the attached estimated fee form is signed and submitted to our Department, including payment of the estimated fee, review of your project will continue. If you have any questions regarding the permit fees or other aspects of the review process, please contact me via email Kimberly.claussen@metrokc.gov or by phone at (206) 296-7167. Sin rely,~ i1 Claussen, Project Manager III Current Planning Section • • Enclosures Cc: Lisa Dinsmore, Supervisor Current Planning Section, LUSD w/enc Lanny Henoch, Planner, Current Planning Section, LUSD w/enc Pete Dye, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD w/enc Administrative Section w/enc Application File w/enc ,, ·@ • King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Land Use Services Division Permit Fee Estimate Application Estimate Number: LOSPOOI9 Permit Title: Martin Property Permit Type: Preliminary Plat • I Date: 10/20/2005 I Based on permit information submitted by the applicant, the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) has determined the amount of review fees for the subject application. The fees shown below do not include ancillary permit fees, recording fees, project-related mitigation fees, or other fees that are passed through to the applicant from other agencies or as part of the project's environmental review. Fixed Fees: Counter Service Fee for Application Intake Fire Review Estimate for Hourly Fees: ( 257 Hours x $144.90) Total Fixed Fees Total Permit Fee Estimate: $483.00 $211.83 $694.83 $37,239.30 $37,934.13 Note: The estimate for hourly fees stated above is based on the total estimated number of hours not to exceed 257. hours for the disciplines listed below, and is calculated using the department's hourly rate in effect at the time the work is performed. Based upon the financial disclosures found on page 2, the number of hours required may be modified. The total estimated hours reflect work performed by the following disciplines: Engineering, Grading, Sensitive Area, Traffic, Parks, Planning, and Project Management. This estimate does not include hours and fees associated with variances and/or adjustments to the King County Roads Standards and Surface Water Design Manual, engineering plans, or additional time associated with the public hearing. After receiving the fee estimate from ODES, the applicant has twenty eight (28) days to return this paperwork, and proceed with an installment plan for the remaining balance due or complete payment. Please call 206-296-6797 to set up an appointment with the Permit Center to complete your payment. Ifthc payment is not received within twenty-eight (28) days, the applicant may be required to obtain a new fee estimate or this application may be cancelled. • • For further questions regarding this fee estimate or for other requirements about this permit application, please contact Kim Claussen via email Kimberly.claussen@metrokc.gov or by phone at 206-296-7167. Project Manager 111 Lnnd Use Services Di vision I -------, . ,'_ -., • • "V,o MARTIN PROPERTY 13.; LOT SUBDIVISION~~~ ~O P~it Appro,al Cood;tioos Dornmoot <:;ft",-~ Fire System Review % ci ~ '<) Tracking Number: LOSP0019 ~,i1.. .J' The following conditions apply to the Fire Engineering approval of the above referenced preliminary plat: AA02 MUDD Any questions regarding the fire review of this plan should be directed to: Bill Mudd, Fire Engineering Telephone: (206) 296-6785. FHOl FIRE HYDRANT W ATERMAIN PERMITS A separate permit is required for the installation of water mains and/or fire hydrants. Submit three (3) copies of drawings and specifications to DOES Building Services Division Permit Service Center for a permit application. Review and approval by Fire Engineering Section is required prior to installation. Plans shall include, but are not limited to; pipe sizes, pipe type, valves/fittings, thrust blocks and/or rodding and material listings. Fire hydrants shall be installed per K.C.C. Title 17 Water mains shall be installed and tested per A WW A standards and/or NFP A#24 (STANDARDS FOR PRIVATE FIRE HYDRANTS AND W ATERMAINS); as applicable. Ref. 1001.4 UFC NOTE: UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED, ANY W ATERMAIN OR FIRE HYDRANT DETAILS ON BUILDING PLANS/ORA WINGS HA VE NOT BEEN REVIEWED OR APPROVED. FH74 PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL Preliminary Fire Engineering approval has been granted based upon the following information provided. To obtain final Fire Engineering approval, the following item(s) must be submitted to the DOES permit service center; reviewed and approved: I. Certificate of Water Availability. (Provided by appropriate water purveyor): Valid one year from date of signature. Minimum acceptance flow shall be 1000 gallons per minute at 20 pounds per square inch residual pressure. II. Three copies of plans indicating: A. Fire hydrant(s) location -measured by vehicular travel distance. (K.C.C. Title 17) Residential 1. 700 ft. maximum spacing. 2. Not more than 350 ft. from each lot. ~ 9 B. Watermain placement (K.C.C. Title 17) t.-:AIN FIU.. e ,. "-iwOPy 1. Source (i.e.) supply connection. 2. Main sizes identified. C. Fire access roads Ref. IFC, Sections 501 through 503, 2003 addition Fire Systems Review Approval Conditions Page I of2 • • 1. Minimum 20 ft. wide unobstructed -13 '6" vertical clearance, unobstructed. All-weather surface, able to withstand 25 tons. 2. Fire access roads in excess of 150 feet (dead-ends), must have an approved tum-around area. Access road shall extend to within 150 ft. of all portions of building exterior walls. Required tum-arounds must be a minimum 80-foot diameter **********Including temporary turnarounds************ 3. Fire access roads must provide 20-foot minimum inside turning radius and 40 outside turning radius when said roads change direction. 4. Fire access roads shall not exceed 15% grade. 5. The required width of any fire apparatus access road shall not be obstructed in any manner, including parking of vehicles. Minimum required widths and clearances established under this section shall be maintained at all times. D. Marking when required, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads and prohibit the obstruction thereof or both. Ref. IFC, Sections 501 through 503, 2003 edition FH77 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL Final plat approval requires an inspection and approval of the fire hydrant and water main installation by a King County Fire Inspector, prior to recording. Call [888)546-7728 to schedule an inspection; after a permit to install has bee obntained from DDES; Fire Protection Engineering. Fire Systems Review Approval Conditions Page 2 of2 FW,.Ncw 'J'nx t\ssigm-ii -Cam West Page I of 2 Anderson, Noreen From: Sara Slalte11 [sslatten@camwest.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 4:15 PM To: noreen.anderson@metrokc.gov Subject: FW: New Tax Assigr,ment # -CamVl/esl Noreen, Thanks for the information just now. Hore is a summary and supplemental inlormation I previously foiwardod to David Please !el me knO',V if you have any questions on anything tiere. Thanks. Sam Slatten (425) 625-1955 ... ·-Orlt;itnal t-1e~aoe·•04 • Frorn: S.ara Sl.ittc.ln Sont: Mend~. April 01, 2005 3:23 PM To: 'd,Wkl,kis5:it,i;,er·ft·0tclrok·q1<iv' Subject: Oavict, I called the dept of assessments and the person I spoke to thought I should contact you regarding t11is question since the properties involved are located w/in TW~ 25 N, Here is a brief summary of the easements in question (attached do_cuments for your review)· 1) A 16' x so· easomont and a 16' x • 600' easement exists and benefits a few parcers. Back in the 60's these easements were never conveyed when the surrounding properties were sold off. After conducting research. we found the neirs to each arid both easements were quit claimed to us, Shamrock Highlands LLC. 2) ShamroCI< Highlands LLC owns many parcels In lhe surrounding area including the one just south and west oJ the easements (attached). ' 3) The KC assessors maps Incorrectly shows An Phung as owning the underlying easement properties which we determined Is not correct. His 1.egal description does not include eilher easernenls In terms of ownership. However. ho is benefited from the easements. What I need to·talk to you about is gelling a separate tax id number for the easements. Currently they are both listed undor lhc following tax id: 1023059042 which is the id no. to Phung's Parcel. Wanted lo see iJ the easements can be included with our adjacent lax parcet: 1023059364 or a new tax id created for them. <~SD0C0903.pdt>> «SOOC0904.pdf» «S00C0905.pdf» «SDOC090S.pdf» It you could call me when you have a minute to discuss I would appreciate it. Thanks, Sara Statton Cam\'Vost Oovolopmant (A25) 825-1955: phono (.12'5) 825-15£5: t.u. 4i6/20()5 Exhibit No. __..1 ...,2 ___ _ Item No. L~:S:PC)S;>\ ':t Received ~ • Z.2.-S):3-: King County Hearing Examiner • King County Department or Assessments Kif\8 County Adtninktntloo. Bldg, SOO Fourth Avenue, Room 709 Suttle. WA 98104-1384 (206) 296·51•1 FA.X (206) 296-0106 March I, 2006 An Phung 9333 57 1h Avenue West Mukilteo Washington 98275 RE: 102305-9042 & 16 root casement Deur Mr. Phung. • Scott Noble Assessor In April 2005, a request and supporting deeds c:unc from Camwcst Development 10 cmrnct an error on our assessors 111:1p. For years the 16 fom easement leading to the County Road was attached to your propcny as if it was yours. Your enclosed deed from July l I, l 986 clearly states that you huve an ciiscment across the Nonh 16 feet of the South half of the Nonhcast hall' or the Southeast guancr of the Southeast quancr of 10-23-05. I con·ccted your legal description which made it much shoner. · Camwcst Development has always acknowledged that you have a right to use the casement. Our office normally does not carry casements in our legal descriptions: however, if you feel more comfortable, I will put a reference to your easement in your legal. Easements "tun with the land" and since you deed calls out the easement, you area emitlcd to it. · Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any more questions. Sincerely, 'ftww ~&u,yJ I Noreen V. Anderson Abstract Analyst Dcpm1mcnt of Assessments 500 4'h Avenue, Room 725 Seattle, W i\ 98354 20(i-205-5736 Direct line Noreen.A ndcrson@mct.rokc.(ov --/ l~ c::, c:;;, • • ..,;,s !O·d:, ·-5 WHE~ R!WORDED MAIL TO ',' \ Josep\l P. McCo.rthy ---~-·--·---·-· Kiintor Taylor .McGarthy & Bntzmann, PC. l501/4th Averiuc, Siiite 1610 ...... P•a• oe1 OF oes .-'Seattle, ~VA 981Ql-1662 /' '} . ;' ' " ·. '" . { ,i"';; ,/ ') }i } 1 ':.( ' ' '':1, ./ ....... ~· .('':;f ,/ j 'QUIT CLAIM DEED " } i i (Plinliandle) 3/J.;J..f3!)/J:5Rcts ./ ... · / '/ / . . ,/ 6' Grnntor: /JP r·, .. J,P HlJri L LCJa Was)urig!on,lumted µ;;b)l,ty compantr/B ti:>-. '7", 2. Patnck K .Hul)sakei-and Ann Mane Hiin~i\ker v_; 3 ~~<ls M.Htpisaker.ind.Den,iseM J;l~.risaker Orante~; " . ;: Lcg'\1.D•~,:i~lptfon: : 4. 11mothy,Hursal,'.er andB011111~ Hunsalfor 5 Brian MornSon..imd Cota Morri"S101{ , 6 · John D Hotlaiid and Barbara Ho1iand' : 7 ! KenneU1 Troseth afad sh·aibn.Tro:setl{ ~- 8.' John W Hunsaker lind Nontia,Jean·.-Hun~faf;;\ •> .,•' •' '''"CC-,, Shamrock H1ghfamds, LLC, a wast1~hor"1 iuwte4.hab~.1fty)onl;any Ptn SEI/4 of SEJ/4 Section 10, ;;;N,:~s{•I{i~g chur/;y .. (Full Description on Schedule A)~ J , ....... , ..... ··t / · Tim Acc,~uut Nos: "102305,9042 .:' J f'·•!fon LI, c:'. a""w"!'h;rtgto~ !muted ltab1hty company, Patrick K Hunsaker and Ann Mane Hunsaker, ,husband .and,.;WJ[e"; James· .. M Hunsaker and Den1se M. Hunsaker, husband and wife: John\v !-lttnsW<e{ and N6rma Je·~n Hunsaker, husband and wife, Timothy Hunsaker and Bonme Hu1isaker, ·husf7i,d and 0 .w1fi:,; B1;mn Mornson and Cora Morrison, husband and wife, John D HoHand ond..sB.arbarll Ho1lad.d,:husband ru1d wife, Kenneth Troseth and Sharon Troseth, husband''an~ ,'•l'ife;_:'Patnck K.''h!ilnsakef, as. his separate estate; Timothy Hunsaker, as hrn separate estate~ Bna·n M9rnso11 1 a:f'h1si:sepat·ate estate, and John D. Holland, as hts separate estate, for and i"n cdnsid~ratwn 6r ten dbllars and other good and valuable cons1demt1on m hand pa1d;....hereby .convey/and,'qu,tcln1~·t.o Shamrock Highlands, Ll,C, a Wash111gton !muted hab,llty compariy,)he .reaLproperty de$crlb~d on Schedule A attached hereto and incorporated herem by refetCnce~:~1tilat~.d 1~ Km'g CoUl\ty, Washmgton· DATED the J:-ct:'/!r ~:;~~~:~~t·; and incelrl·:r 01"/1ll1p,ari:iillelsl,I I II' I ,·--1·------ / I I I t::.7)1!-,.( t<-f.e. </-1..c /u'.WJ • , II /~d 1v:,/it 1it~1~ie1l'i /:~~/ 20~ 1 0 1 00-2. e 1 ~A 1,:.,,,,,.,1vf' ,/l(VJ'" 'l-"-"' ,.,,_.. . TRANSNAIION Tl oco . 18.00 · ..... " ,~·""""'' ~ . "'1 "' "''"' ~ PROS: 'I OF 011 . .. 10/09 01 IS: 2 / .,. / ,Ji '((, Q.,:;, KINO C UNTY, U ,. ;, " t:Ul-r.;./..(:./J'.. .,.C,lt..J.P"l',t(l,t,.,{., t,,e, ·7 Page J v1 ii .,' • /d;,/ 1,l,:. ~' At«) (},vu,u,ils /L,fPl<_ / )'?,/be,,,/ j~M,1 ()!<) ,fi~/1~1-,' ,. ~•••• • ,.,.-,··•r • . .hft. 11 3 p rH 'BS liYTHE. 1"'· .. , or RECl1f,11~ •, ·.·' . ktti Kl»n C;r:1, 11· KING~UNTY E'.l'r.11.-s: .,.~x ,,, ... , ' -.;..., 1•111 tnlU ·~iollll-.Ztpltnrulbn1 'Uot\JOO~-------- § co THE CRANmf( 4ZN..U.D BU~ and t\A'il' I. 8(Ll, t..,~ ·100 ,.J f4 ltN IULARS 1M OTllC!l VALIJA8lt CllNSIOERAl!Otlli es,,o7.ru •· ·RECO F Ct1Sll5L 01313 s.oo 1 Su~ or Wuhi.n rton : NMUI n&l r or tho NMUwtrat qtJDC'l:er oF tho SouU~flt. qu&r:t:r or tht. SQvt,J,.11-d; q110rtct ur $81:tlon 10. T~6h.1l• ?) Hatlh, Ra.,ge, l:•nl1 i .. tt~. Jf\.KJf\U Ctu')ty,. w~hirYJlonJ ~ J(JC(h(~ "1'flt an rcth,ltir.-1!., fh'cr lhc North 16 feet or t~ Soutti h•H or Lhe Nudhn~t ht1lt / nr tho So,.,t.:h(.pi\; qv9,"'ff;f .. ol' thb Soutkwnt tJdllrter of 11:Ud S.~llon 10f ~K> _......., f'OC!T:-'CP. v,n, tit'I tHVJt~tl'.'!!.. o""cr ~ kn"flh 1' r.,ot. or t.t1e t.ut ,o f?:l't of th~ ScMlh holf I' or ltw, Norlh.Moo.l 'f)tl"Hn M the-Soulhr:ir.:t ""Attn or tho $ouhuH•al qui,,rlcr Gf ~.dd St<tlo" ,o. . ,, ........ s.oo ·-· -~--· -~-·• O< • -,M, 0 •• • 0, ..... OM -.... _,, H ....... -· ....... • .. ·•-•"'•• --______ ..... __, __ ., .. ________ .,_ ....... _ .. .... .. . .. . . .. .. . . ... .. . -· . ..... __ . ____ _ -~- I) K ng'County Rccorder.fice Web Access • Page I 01'2 @ King County MMMW 111/!JfilUf? 11-i4fM!f.ll (3,fom1,,,lf.'l llf.~,M~31l Recorder's Office Records, Elections and Licensing Services Division Department of Executive Services Ojjicial Public Records Scurcil Results l:eo)nqoases.oU.er.:tlvo.,Juty 1,.:2005 ar'td Augq51 L 2(105 Menu New Search Prefs Help Instrument Book~ Otite Filed Document Nnmo Nome AsaoeWttid Nnmc Nnme Legal DcGcdpt!on Number Page Type (+)=Moro Names Type (+)=More Nnmos Typo ~00302.1.30026.0'i? 40.Q1M~>OOJ.Oo.Q 00{), 000 20040813GOOJ8..:1 coo. l)OQ 02fl:\J2003 Oliff GLAlM DEED 04/231200.1 QUlT CLft.lM DEED ()~fl '.3!~~04 D€E00F \'HUST CAMWEST DCVCLOPML:JJ1 INC CHARLES OF.J30f'.iAH .J SHAMROCK HIGH~.M<DS LL C R H R 200~08_13@,0.;181 {}00 • (18/13-'::!N/4 ASSIGNMENT SHAMROCK R {)00 OF RENTS H!GHlANOS LLC 20040813000~84 OGO · D8H3i£!004 UCC FILING 000 ,1\l!lA~:12/l 000 • 0412StJ005 NOTICE 000, , .. · __ . j!;·: ' ... ·\iri;;,,;,,, SHt,MROCK 11 HIGHLANDS LLC CAMWEST DEVELOPMENT INC(+) · R SHAMROCK HIGHl.ANOS LLC SHAMROCK Hl(:iHtPJJQS I.LG BANK OF AMEH!CANfl-. BAMK OF .A.Ml:JllCA NA BANK OF AMERICANA SHAMROCK HIGHLANDS E E E E E E Links to oxtemal silos do nol cons1i1u10 endorsements DY Kinu County. By visiling this and olt,or King County wob pa.gos, you O):prossly agrao !~) bo bound by torms and conditions or tho site. Tt10 rJPHlil::L l11tnn1111 PtJIJiv~ Ar:c;;f;,HS Mc•<Jul~1 Vtusion 3., C<f'Yt'IHhl \.y) 2Cii~ 'l!OIY) 'Hnfl lfll~J1(.;iv;;;.;, 11'1(:, All F\1~;!1(~ nlit!.!Zlt'V(ICI, hllp:// 146. 129.54.93:8193/rcsults.asp SEC 10 1WNS1-1P 2J Fl.NO O'."i ;o;:i:,y;;;o.1:1 SEC 10 TOWN 23 RANGE M H12'.'.,~~,. r1u1:: SEC ~() T01NN ... ~~ MAt-;(,E ui.;. 1:;;-r,.,;:, tl-(H;J .. , SEC iO iOWN 2:i RANGE Of1 \!)2405· 004'.: SEC 10 TOWC 2'.! RANGE 0;') 102:H)f,, 9042 .. SE£ DOC FOH ADOTIONAL REFERENCE MUMSEAS SEC 10 TOWN 23 RM•JGI?: ()!', 1:)2~!(,J:),r!(\,I~' 2/2812006 I M :Loo, 200 ueo r • ~[ RF.Al. t:ST,\TE EXCISt: TAX AfflDAVIT nL,\l JYPI 111t'·nuN1, t"l1,wn.Rti,sRcw-t1tArrt11.~,M-1>IWA< I h" i.,rm ,~ )",... •<'~t•r1 ""h,:n ,\.lmp<'J b'j \J-.h..:t , "ll !lMl..~}.t.i . h~IJ,1;,1CoL~l1l11l11\l,~1II\011u1 · / ;tJ,:h.rm Mu 64°tll!(U ti fo1 ktr,,;rt,n¥ T1;1;1n/rr1 ufCM!roil1n; l111f1u( ol \;1'111ty (l.vr>tml1Jf i.i \lit Oq~M1rnl 11r 14,~111,c1 ,, i' TUI\ A.J'flUA'il1' Wtli. NOT Uf .'IC:rtrrr.o liSLF!\.",AU AktAS 1·1 AIU'. f\Jl I,\' ('0\il't.r1F.I) f i . i,;~,..,~K.'i~.MORR[S ED~I.M~=iRUS! -~---iN_, ___ c~ ~-~!_LO~ENT, lNC:, _________ _ _ Jl1L~.!:l:!.~2Jl .. BAN~.-~~---. .... ~ ··-··-...... ----• . .. --•... \11~ 42b MONTGOMERY s·r, 3RD FLOOR t ~ \lltf\ 97 20 NE 120TH PL. I 100 r . ... . . --·--· -----. ----~ --. ---·------. - tn>1,up~1t,r, SAN FRANCIS~~A 94104 -·---1,t)~i.1;,p .KIRKLAND, \IA~~ , ... ,~~' ,~. \l ld';";;I l'lttl~l 111~. •I-':,,,~.'.' "''1.llttllllll\l'l"'!Jfl I'/\.. I All 1 "\1'1111<,! I 1<1\1i.u1111, ~-rr;fiNrY11u A,\Hllt R f1 JIU , : ,I .' •· , ,,,·"\.,.-A\',l\\111\All>lllt,\\l\!\11'! I Nam~ S~~, fs ~RAtiT~B .,...~-~,-\ ,;..;/---/ 2!.!L9!_ 102305:9042 ___ -·-····-__ ·- 1 ;·,:,,:;,,:'=.:~~=[~t]_[ ?:27 ;·;:=· ·---~=--= "--~~*=:· __ ------ a 11.(,,\I l)h( ~ll'TIUN oi<r,wP~krv:}n:f ri l\1N,::,6lJMsc;:~;~~~ ... ~{1, ___________ (OllNfY ClUII IN:("11 ~II~-------~- \h«) AJ.:lln, 1,rpr.ip,:rl} ",mp,.,k.•:J) E.«:L...:...-.. ,(__~·~----/:·~.~-~:_ ___ ----··---·····"-.... __ . ___ ...... "-··-·-··- , rnr. NOR'l'H 16 FEET or THE soLlTH 1:12 oF nti 'Nv. I/4 or rim SE 1/4 Of THE trn l./t. m· ' SECTION 10, !OWNSIHP 23 }:()RT~',, ltANC£··5 dsr.f w.~. _.,. ... ,, ·~ .. .,_, ; ./; / / ;· \ I \,tl.l'\\ \dhn; l'tld,,'·s,..: .•.. H \'.:nm1.1t l'wf'l.r1) 1,kJu~n \ ___ .. I J~.-hk ",ll"'ll Pm,· \ I ~.i;.r l,n '\l.ito., 1, l.1><.sll \ -0- • Scharer, Karen From: Sent: toan nguyen [anandtoan@yahoo.com] Tuesday, August 29, 2006 12:58 AM To: Anderson, Noreen Cc: Floren!, Ray; Scharer, Karen Subject: Your letter dated 3/1/2006 • Attachments: 2374847992-doc1 .jpg; 3827376833-doc2.jpg; 3421750085-doc3.jpg; 1903820223-doc4.jpg; 1945285862-doc5.jpg; 506301035-doc6.jpg Dear Ms. Anderson, Page I of2 I am writing this Jetter in response to your Jetter dated march I, 2006. See Doc. I attached. Also, included with the Jetter are 12 other pages. See Doc. 2-13, attached. (I will send all attachments in 2 emails). Due to having to take care of my very ill 80+ parents and three children, I was not able to write to you sooner. I recall we spoke once on the phone. I would like to protest the action of your department for the following reasons: I. I have used, maintained, and paid tax on the entire property since 1987 without being challenged by anyone. Thus, if the 16' x 50' easement and the 16' x 600' easement were owned by others, then per the Adverse Possesion Rule I have the right to claim them as mine. 2. It does appear that there was an error committed in 1942 when the land was sold by the Edelmans to the Goodes. However, I do not think it make practical/logical sense to assume or argue that the ownership of the easements is still belong to the.Edelmans's Trust because conveyance was not made. What if the conveyance document was lost? What sense does/did it make if the Edelmans sold off the land but retained the easements for themselves? The easements serve several lots. It makes sense to attach the easements to the largest Jot - which is my Jot based on the county map. 3. Debra Charles and the Camwest/Shamrock Companies unfairly filed quit claims without informing me. The latter have tried to buy my land several times in the past. Shamrock was my neighbor for over a decade. Ms. Charles is someone I never knew or have ever met. Both knew the easements were described on my tax bill. Thus, it's absolutely unethical for them to file quit claims, especially when I am the owner of the Jot. Plea.se keep in mind that in 2003 Camwest even somehow switched the ownership of my Jot to their name. I have a letter from Mr. Phil Sanders, KC Tax Supervisor as proof. Per the quit claims, I am surprised that Camwest paid Ms Charles $6000 for the 16' x 50' easement; but paid nothing for the 16' x 600' longer one. I wonder how Camwest was able to get you to send my 2003 tax bill to them. Is there a procedure that must be met? Don't you verify ID of requester? I would like to know if what had been done by the Camwest Co. can be properly reversed. If there is a way, please let me know. Please share this letter with your manager. Thank you. Sincerely, An (Andy) T. Phung 08/30/2006 • Scharer, Karen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: toan nguyen [anandtoan@yahoo.com] Tuesday, August 29, 2006 1 :05 AM Anderson, Noreen Floren!, Ray; Scharer, Karen your letter dated 3/1/2006 -part 2 • Attachments: 1959860860-doc?.jpg; 3945854302-docB.jpg; 277052935-doc9.jpg; 2352753773-doc10.jpg; 276365111-doc11.jpg; 1868743538-doc12.jpg; 1785310929-doc13.jpg Hello again, This is the rest of the attachments. Andy Phung Get your own web address for just $1.99/lst YI-We'll help. Yahoo! Small Business. 08/30/2006 ----------, Page 1 of 1 / -~ • I'! I ,\',I'. l''fl•t.tJKP!l!NJ 1·11-·A-.1 ... I KLVi1tM : ; ,,, • llf.AL F.STATE EXCISI'. I'.\\ Al-I· Ill,\ \'IT (rl,.\PllUt1}•l'ifH\\ tllll'IIK-1,,,,\\,\\ lot l•,i ~!/ o,tt,.I' h1 \\! Ml~ \OH• I 111'~ l,,.m h )<"II IHUrJ <>.hv1 ,1.u111•1,I h> , .i\.11,-•1 f (U.'.l' J<>r>nNu 11a.oou111 mr lttpun,llj lr;in~ln,ul\ ,.,11 .. ,:1m~ I""''" ,•1 I 1,c·" '"''""~'!''"*'"' 1>.r"'""'"1"11<s"""•l -/ nu, AfUU,O'I l'WII I.Mll Ut: '" I I l'I t O l<f\,I "" \11 \Ut '" 1·1 \Ill I l 11 l j 11,1r1 I H/1 .--1:;~h1, r~;:;11}· ~~·,null) .. ~ (.,,.,fi,•J UI J,nq,)l!.lh ~ "' l..rql lJr11il l lrn('l.:r K~ ,! ! UL w ',,, ~ 1J,f1li.:J "' ~IJ/T<'lll h·~: 1 .. 1;'.nJ.'f"'" 'f"I~_, .. 1..m1 ,rnJ 11111c11lh.i1;.I, 0111Ji1h,r)' \. h.ii>!~1 ri-1 J.I lU. W I ,cmp! IM01 Pf111i,,,_r1t 1.1\ 1' J n1,1~,,!\i my111111J11u,t• c:tuiii~, -~ 1 l't,_J,U w · .. ',,:lh:r\ l'.,t(lljl! lh~ \J/i . . ' ikc~lVijt~ \p.'.!h!I ,.,lu,lio,,11 .;. h1,!hl'l< 1'11./f''ll} I 11.11~\'.f 1'-1 ~611( W '. 0 0 0 l'rnp~ri, I H... ~"..iw "t'i, ,. · ;: O l.uiJ .. ,1h IIL" h"'IJ"'l.: O !.inJ "11h r,R1'1t!u.~l)\i,wJ i'."•lJm.::· CJ.4.1•.l ,.,,1, 1ui,h1II' t,,,,m-. []11111~11111!)/ .: ,· · ·Clbu1ldu;11<'"1l) l'nnnl'•l lh, ·bApt\h-(.;',.11 /' /' 0 ''"J~1;J.i.1I Q1,mt,i:1 (].~r,<1~ul1m.1I r .. ~' p·;-~1n1n,r/1t.l/u1,lu.,.111JI O Ulh..'t M-H, ___ ;., -· ., / •• ;, -:: •• ,.:,,zi._, ":":::: a ,,)No'i1l.1·Vl1't1~·n"ll'i';~N~:;• nu'w ~~ lllJ!\ll(W>,4'l41_ ll lhL ,1~" "'"'ncrtil <1( faoJ itui is, 1.-,"1"---0. ,,r ;,.,,11,1.oJt.JI J\, 11111:11111,l, ,., l;,r.·,1 l,mJ ,..,,h 1u -.,,i,1mu, Llw .1~~,,1;,;,1",n "' Ji;,,i(,,,111,,.,.,,1 ·t111,.h :, l,mJ, llw "~"" ""'1",r{\) ~""'' ,,i;n t-.,h,i~-II ,h~ IW"'l'ticrt\l(kf n~ <kM_,h' '" ,1~1n1.M: wd, .l ... ,vh•.a.1 .. ,n ,,, IA "'!;11;\l""'· ~II ~01n~ru.ujn• u, -~,. ;: ~M•1m1111I \,,\\ .~.t!u1l~ul f\ll\111111 Iii N(:w1,~~1.;J·,20;1';nt1 l,~0.111 Kt \\Ir : .. :4~ ·\,U!l~ -J\,lll II\'. ~:ai1U pll)'Ahlc hy tllt\cOcr n,JrJri:.ftftn .ti lh~ hm,.. :,·,,i~ic,:ihec.OllnG~"'1~iirm\b-i'11t1.:tm;Ol.'Jf1t~1.1iM;!Wil,r1.11t1.1,, : 4ilahilo tu W11ii'11:it ila'~,11',uf..,n ;,r J~"flflJ1m11 ,mil 11111'>1 ,,.im[i~~I• ' h,.•lo" \1;:11111u1n U<>rl<>l 11,u..,,,.,,I\ 111~~!1 th., 1,.,,-J ,,,thc11Mm •n,' · • l.l'>lli,.itu,,r, uf ,J,.-:,;1,:n,olm!I I! ,1 "" !,,n;i,t ,,.u,!Jti,,, ,1 ;.;llt,~·.r,'1uo,{,l ">./ II~ ,u1r.n,.w, ... 11111t, l,1,,, "'II h,; .oppt,.J /\U """ !'"""'" ITTU).I \ll'ill D.itc _________ _ --------------·----~· l't• ,,,,, Ill. l'.t\ ., '-\1.ra.-:J,' in ,AG& •t\ o, 161 Jej --'-../, y / / ".·,,.,..... / ,' ,· ······-~ _.. } : ,· ii fllUll"tHf, Lup,rd/11,! W Al 01unl~r J!t,J cv•l.111,1),1,11 WA( So I '>t,< _-\uh/·: 4SS.:::.{1i:2S5 ; I >I'• ,1t ! 1,.,,.,1u Ii\ (Nil/c1luti: ~1 1 ' ' , Apr11 'f9('..2~2~ (,m\\ \dhfll! l't1H" s· "'/ _,-o-. n- /'lt,,,n.i] l'JhJ"-11~ i,!ul,a!I 1-_::2::. _ l.o,~hl, ,,11,,,).1'11·~ l, ,-0-··-··--=· I ,.,,, I," '>tat,; \ _ -i},-------~· ilc ,·mre,11 .. n;ll 1rul1luh<Hl for 11 ~~-~i1~·um 1~m ul nvt 1~1<1t~, · '• ,.,.i..,01<! tl<Alai~ ('U.(X.liJ 00'!, i•r by hmh 1rn_rn".(:rim..:r.r'ifld,, \hi • l'!I \ \ I ... ' I '.\., .... , .. , .... , • • ! ,, .. ~ / ,/'"'\ . ,;"·/ ,/ I :'RfAL ESTATE E.XCISE 1" AX AFFlllAVIT / si/PP~i'.~iENTA~ N')Riui1;1VE UNDER wAc •s1-61-21s \ \ .. ~/ /; :/ /·,/~/--:: /"//•',j The Mom:ffdclm:111.'J'n1~1: Grahtor; holds th!,-als~t(of Mr 11.nd Mn Moms und I.1lhan Edelman, de-ceased 111,: \ 9~}:· the.:l~dcl_mnns }nten:~l' 1111~ i{ Real Hsi.ate Crnm'U.Ct to convey 10 Mr and Mrs Goode the ''NW 1/4 of the SK,\/.1 9(.t111f sP., 1/4 of Setuon 10 und the NM)t 16 feet of tfl': South 112 of1he NE Ji4 o(the SE 1{4 oith·c !3E li4 ofS~chon 10 Copy attached ·L,~~-/ ,.,' / / ./ _,,"°····,,,.,.,, /·-., The l'ulfillmcnl deed fronfthe l;.de\nums ;o lho·q,uodes, d:1t~d Junc.flO,f' 942, om1ttrd the 16 foot smp Copy Attached The 'ff\.ls1, lhcrd'orc/n;lumcd a prdsump1iV_,; tntcl't5t in the strip Copy Attached ~:-t ·'/ :.:"" / ~-_.<''::_.·,,. } /:;.~-,·t CainWt:st Development, rnc, Grnmee. 1s_U s1icc1:isor ut 1'1llC 1,{thc:/Goodcs 111e qu1t.c\lum deed transfers ihc Trullt's mterut m the 16 1001 strip I~ C'°m\Vcs11n miler tci'Ct~ar mk to the 16 foot Slnp .• r·""··.,., \ ·,,.,>,, :/ / <..,·' ·1: ',\ ./ '} f cert!fY under ~i~palty or JIC'JUr)' under the Ja,..,·,,o(.tj)C' St;J.tc of W9slungt_?,~:1h:u~tho forcghmg 15 true ~nd COOCCI ' {_\ { / ~~;;:,·: ·:' ~ ~ !J6seph . , .arthy, ~1:c:nt or Gr~~ / Dnt~i.l M'y 1,.'-7'o_9z; at SC~1.1le, Wa11hmc.ton .......... ':',{,,,,... } ,. ' l ·I r'/ ,, ,' / ::' • • ... ' ,' / .\' . ' w'i:.EN 1&coRDED MAIL TO 111 IID 1 1 111111111 20030213002662 , , Kantoi/faylilr 1,1cCarthy & Bntzmnnn, P C . 1501 4"' Avenue, Suite 1610 .. ,._, CM9Mi oco 2e ee PA 0\0F U/13/ en 1!'&1 KIHG COUNTY, Y~ ,Seatiii:, WA98!QJ:16q,J ',, . ·Attn Joe McCarthy ,....,,/ ,, ... ,,,, ' .l / ... / ./ ./ ,,:: ./ .,····"'"'• 'Cam West Oevelopmen,:· Inc, / ·,,. Sham1~ock 0H1gl1\atj~,l LLC'\ >·, ,/ ·-,(r ..: _:: .r / ~:. .. ..:' ·!;, Ptn SE 1/4;' SE.,'1/,4, Sec. 10, Tc23N, Ri5E Orantor: Grantee: Legal Deocr!ptlon: ·· ... ; .'.· ·:· _.:. ;" 102305-'164.i. ' . ' '\ .:' Tax Accoui:w,t t{umber: Related Oi>cumenta: None . j j f' ~ CamWe;;' Deve)op:tent, Inc, for and ,n cons1derat10~ ofTch Dqllars ar)d othec· good and valuaqle cotis1d~ratJ9n m hand paid, hereby conveys ariti'qurtclat,ms,io Sl,arni·ock' Highlands, LLC, J-' Wa,slunston lirnned hab1hty company, all or its right, htle and mt,<frest rn,:,ihe following described .... rcal pro~rty, situated tn King County, Washington ··i • . · Th{Noc[~ tifeel';c•th~·s6'ilth Half of the Northeast Quarter of the~'$<1u~l1eniQuarter of the Southeast'Quarlir .. bf Sesnon 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, WM . DA~ED·.th.~ . ..7qth d~i~r ;ianuary,,-2003 ' :' . ' ;· . •. Cam West Devetol)meht/'lnc/· / a Washington Coi=porat1oq/ ./ 'I. . .t ', l ·:,,,;,.,;' By ~11.oa~~···P~' ·'··ri Nun~~bi,W ' · · Its President ·~. Page I of2 ' • ;' WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO : ~· .:• JOS.F.Pfi P ~ICCARTIW / ·' .'..•' .. i<;At,TOR TAYLOR MCCARTHY PC fsot 4"'.'A'vm,uE; SUITE 1610 ' S~A1·rr.E, WA 98101'1662 . ,, / /.,· Grantor: DEB6RAH'J C.HAl<LES' ., ,/········,,. I' ' • • ,• Gn.1nt cc: Lognl DoscriJllion: Tax Account" N·U;·:. Related llocumcnts·:·:, '.·,. .. :· :: ; .J '" SHAMROCKJH?H11NfS, f·C 'i..,,, Ptn SE 1/4, SE l/4;S!:c l.O, T;23N, R SE 102.?>059o'ti. <· None • ; ;. '· '\; DEI30R,\H J./Clil\RLES, an 111d1V1dual, for and m considcranori' of'i'cn ii,pars ($10 00) arid other good und vi'1uable'comiidcra!ton 111 hand paid, hereby convey and qu,tclai~, t,:i"°SHAMRQCK_.HIGHLANDS. LLC/a Wnsh111gtbn h!;Jlitt:d habthty company, all of her nght, lltle and\hte~t uf.th~ follOwmg descnbed rca!JJJrop~fty, H_1fuate~· 11~.KYiig Cyunty. Washington · · · ' :' ···:,.,,,/ ./ ,/ \ Thc'Nprlh 16 fcc,1·G(the Easf';50 f~cl of the South Halt' of the Northwest Quarter or'the Southeast Quaner of the Southcasl"Qm\rter.:of Scct,on 10,'fawnship 23 North, Range S East, Willamette Mend,an ,.,, ~·· ' ; .' :· .,· .,_, QUllCLAIM DULD ·' .. ·' ,_r _.:-.:·"'\ -· ,-t·' .t ./ ': .... : . '''"'• '"'"··rrhtt.'nmilunder ofthJs page)s lcfi-b.!ank lltfi!flflfJnally) ,. :-, " ' :. __ ,,/\, ,,.,• ,.,. ·'/ E2033198 94/Z3/Zff4 12'4& ~J~C COUNTY MA stlf~ *e~A:I a: ~-·· ;. :;;: PAGEHl OF 091 • • REAL ESTATI!: •:xc1sE TAX AfflDAVIT 1'tus form lf your receipt .,.t,en swnpa.l by cuh,a Cl!AP1ER 0"$ RCW-CHAl"ll:R Hikfl WAC , J'o,. USi AT COU'flV Tkl:IAWli'l'SOfflCE \Ute: fr.rm Nt.1 U-000111 fbt Rtpor11tts T1tn1f~n ofContro1hn1 1tt1.1:m1 ornr.myo,nenru, 10 tht Pr;i.f11nt111 of llt\·cnue) ' TIIIS An'JOA\'IT WU.I.NOT nt: ACC1:n·•:11 w,;u:s.s Al,I.A\I.J:AS 1~, AMF. Ft:U.)' COMPl.f.1'1\U ,-.. -"~"'-- • (.!:'GAL 0£Sl'llJ!1TION t5\,.~lt;;;m?~\r~Ji\r~.ts' i~~~ t/Nl~~-"4i~/n:o ~~('()\~TY ()R €JIN ('11'Y or &uum ________ _ Suu, Addoe-u (•(p,np~rt)' '",,..p,o>'cd) .·c' --·-~'--"' --•'-+'"··--------------------------.,. ' . . . t ~ . ' The North I 6 fed of 1h,: E,ul SO feel of the ~Oath I llJf or1h't North¥i·es: Quarter of the Sout."lc,st QtUrtcr of the S0ulh<1a~1 Quarter n( Sci:uon 10, Township 23 North, Runge S fall, W1ll~mcUC hll:;1diai1 ., : . ' . \ ......... ,~ -----------------''s···'-' _,.J.. .. ,/ . II l11hu proµi:rl~ currcn1ly YF.s/ ' Cla:mf1ed u, dn11.nah:d as forcu hmd'7 Ch~p!tl 84 B RCW . \ .. cf Cfosi.11leil .s cunem ll5oC bnd (opcfl r.p.«. fum IUld agmultural, or timbcr)'l Cht1pcu 8·1 ),I RCW ~cmpc /t.;m pro1>cJtyiltJ\,as a nonprnllt 01g:.1'111utw11 Ch:qn~r 34 )~ RC:W Sdlt:1\·P..1<0,n,pt Rei :>lo _·_·. '. ... ReHN1og. sp1:i:ial /.ihuuon u h(ilon, ptl)f>n'ly'I Cha pit( S4 ~i\,f<.CW , 0 0 IJ !') l'rtle:£1'1)' Tn,t G,J Lmd only· '·: ; LJ l~n;J w11h prcHO\.l.dy wie.i bi.JilJmg:, I] 1,mbcr ,mly ' 0 land 1~11h new b\.11!Jin,1 0 l~d with mobile h,m;,: 0 bu11d1ns only Pn111'1pal Uui .D Apt .i.i+ 1uul) 0 1cw:kn1wl D umbc, tJ ai~u!tu!~I .· C} comn\C1~1all11ldustu.il , 0 urh(r __ ,.: -_ J B ( 1 > Nor1C:~ op cOl'<'TiNuAl::c.n iac~. ~ Ji~oR RCW &4 H) --i If the ne.., ownt"rt.) uf!.ind 1h:n 1fclw1fic,;t(l1 delip,iw:l a., 1;urrcr11 u~ or fo,m land v.uh io_cormnue }he ctiu1fiQA11on,:<11 dt~1g11a11~~ •. o! tuch land, 1hc n,w,1wnc1(s) nliJ;\U1gn b1,low _If the !)CW ~~c5(,;) do' n~ du1re lo eonhnue '"'h clas111icahon or dcsisnatw.i, ~1 w~,.aung Of \ atldmonaf cu. calcul,1ed Jlllr1U&nl ,;1 RC\\'..&.!,·)) llr.i .Ind 140 ot RCW 8-4 .l4 104 sh.di be dut and p.1y.1hlc tiy lhe SClln ot:11/11sfcror,11hc hmc of &:llc l11c i.wnt)' mcssor mJ11 lkll:;mnnc 1f thd'lc.iiJ tr~Men'9 ~· / ,, qu&h!ln tO contmuc cfo.n11ieouet1 or dttj,J~tllh ~ uaijt so w!iCl!tC .. lxlow S1gnit1.11e1 do nOI noceuanly mcirl ffic land_:will !cmain U1 · ,.: tllW.tfitiLI\On 0( de'ugniltnm lfll 00 kin&crq1.1al10~, II WJ.11 ~ mMVffl. and lhe compnnahng 1:s,,;cs will be apphtd All naw_ uwncrr 11~~111&~l T'h1, laud O Jut~ D <:lwt not qu;thfy for cMim.111111,c , ' : 1>-.. k _____ _ Oc~tnpt1Qn ofpciwnil property mt!udtJ in gru.u 1tlhng pmr, lwth 11ps1blt (c:1, fom1hm!, eqi.:ipm'1nl, etc J or m1angiblc (cs, goodw1ll, ..,grcc"rncn1a101 tb-~ofTipclc, clt ) : '; :: ' ,. GIO:'!~ iidh~·g )>r,~t .., s/--le·h,0/l_Q_,,, __ ~, ---- Pcnonul t'rnpiirty.(di!Uu.:~ f .. _:---------·-·-------- TD11Gblc l>elhnt1-.I?1,Ce :S~,.O.QQ _____ .. ··--- F.xmc Tiu Sil.it;'. t~:_J:,8_'-------- Lool :. $·"'-------·---··--·· SU.IC Loccl '----------- Ocl:nqucnt Penalty s ________ _ Total Due A MINIMUM OFU 00 IS DU£ AS A PROCESSING l'fili A~I) 'fA>.. AFFlDAVfl' PrrJLlrf l'c:1Jury as II clus C felony which u pun.1dublc by 1mpnsonmcnt 1n th,e ttale corrc(tit•m,I 1~11~J.;_ror ~-~,,~~n/icfin uf nlll rnort than fi,..t )(ars., or by a liflt 1n an W'nOun! ll,cJ by tht cou11 of nN more th11n five 1hoW41\d dollar, {SS.000 00}, or by'bolh 1mp,isonn'iff11,v.n<1 ti~ (RCW 9A 20 020 {IQ) ·----------'~· ·--~'----~-'-'---'- .. -....... ~· 2 rrn IN'rv;ssc66€rlt ~~ llf:.V 84 OOOlt (J•li•'J'J) {l'f) Ol,Ul-01 J . ' PAGIQet (If! 001 • • ,:" •: wiim:i'~\ir;nRr>RD MAIL TO: ·: .~ .•. / ·, / 11111111111111111 20050425000208 ',,, ,., ...... •• •. ··">< ''"·'" ios1;r11 pJ~tccAR'.fi'iv . J' KAiro1i/rAYl.OR MCl,',J\RTliY P.C. / ; '·)501 4rit AV~NlJE,;SUri'E 1610/" ,. •. / SEAH'LE, WA'981.01-1.662/ ", '· $1U111110CK HIGMI. N ze 'ell PAGHlll OF H2 04/2S/ffl8 10:02 "" Kl!l(l COUNTV, UA Grantor: Grantee: Properly Tax Accounl: .. ·- ' , . . iNOJ'ICE (W TM~R<>PER TAX ACCOUNT .' ,.' .· . : ( ' · _Camw~st DQ,elgpm~rit, .Inc. . ' Shamrock Jlighlands, !!,LC -: •' . .,:' ;: .,. Plat ofSllamf'()Ck,tiighlan,ds : 102305904{!()230593&~ • ;; / ' lfoforenc~~f 1:>oc·tu.1,1~nts: •' ''.i,,3: .• _, ,l .· ... ( :. ( ·-,_~- 200 I 1009002299, 20011009002308, 200 I I 02600 I 657.':20021231002396, 20030403001808, 2001'10090·0~09,,.200,H 00900231 J,i200,i'I0!)9002312, 20020508002503, 20020513001'602{ 20020815.000404, 20030213002662, 20031212002038, 20031212002039, 2003 tii2002040, 2004042300 I 060, 20040813000484, 20040813000485, 20040813°00041!6,.il0040928001366, ·. 20041018002418, 20041229002517 • ... ,, .. ""? . . . .,. , ... ' "-:1.:/ ,· :/ \:l .. : . ,/ ,:·'· ·:. <. .,· Caf11Wcsf"'Dcvc.lol)inent, ... J.nc., ,·, a Washington corporntion, and Shamrock '"Highlands, LLC, a Washington li11\ited liatiility cQinpany, hereby give notice that die documents recorded under the Audit6r's,Hl{N~rnbc,is listed abovc·impropcrly included the properly tax account I 023059042 in the Indexing lnfonnu\ion.'Thii propet'tax parccloumber should have been 1023059384. ··. ,.::-" . DATED: APRIL '2i/~ 2005( -·--_,,," ,,' Num:u (W IMl'ROtll:R TI\X AL'<."OU}l.'T.l'l!IJNO.APR06 05 ,;SIIAMROCK HIGHLANDS, LLC a Wii:s~ington limited liabili1y company 8y:(:amWcst Development, Inc. //~~N.L. By:, ,, . .· .. //yjf_ ·_ } / E_ric C.ampbe !;:President . ,, : scm1ou~:li 0 l-.!~ c.x;1i~rr .~ · :'" ·i ' ,· ...... -............. _____________ _ HPCI 102305904207 t;J CAMWES'l' DEVELOPMRNT""i.NC' 9720 NE 120TH Pl, tJNIT ] 00 KIRKLAND WM • • .'.." t::' :t .t Po.c:-r:, / ;J l I l'..117¥~-i'>"-'.:.~;;:{ ... .:, iJ,Kf~,'V,d 0 EJ(isc.': ,,,. I'-' t.1 :J07 / {1.J,4110,ur f'{{V ')'"0 11-~ ~11-~,,.,? l:t'" ;, DOC:.1--88,1505 11/lBiO? MAME/ADDRESS S'I':A!JDIT ACTIVE 2N99!)~-----N 1/2 OF NW <t/4 OF SE 1/4 OF 9803<! LOT,10--23-05 BLOCK: 9042 02/28/06 SE 1/4 .1\1,SO N 16 F'T OF S 1/2 OF' NE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 ALSO N 16 FT OF E 50 FT OF S 1/2 OF LAST l,EGAL NW .l./4 OF' SE .l/4 OF SE 1/4 l,P.SS RY OY ST SC NC 04 T 03 T U:VY OM--LV 6867 6867 YEAR RECEIVABLE 'J'YPE 03 SURFACE WA'l'ER 03 SWM BOND 03 NOXIOUS WEED 03 CONSERVATION RPCI, 1()230$.904207 ·--06 L.r\ND 190,000 190,000 IS 6 C'O RD IHPS 161.,000 161,000 'f'O'I'AL BILLED .00 4,311.93 DUE; LEVY BII,LE:D AMT PAID AM'l' 9440 91.0 91. 4.3 9470 10.57 10.57 9420 1. 95 1. 95 9430 5.00 5.00 JUMP CODE: PAID P A .00 4,311.93 ACRE BENEFIT @ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services • 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 October 26, 2005 Sara Slatten Cam West Development 9720 Northeast 1201h Place, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 • RE: Notice of Complete Application Proposed Subdivision of the Martin Property Application No. LOSPOOl 9 Date Filed: September 28, 2005 Date of Complete Application: September 28, 2005 Dear Ms. Slatten: The purpo~e of this letter is to notify you that the Land Use Services Division (LUSD) has determined the above-referenced application is complete as of September 28, 2005, under current requirements for a complete application. This initial determination is intended for the purposes of determining the vesting date, and for applying the time periods for permit processing specified in KCC 20.20.100. Supplemental information may be requested by LUSD, as necessary, for the continued review of your application. Our goal is to process your application within 120 days. However, the complexity and level of analysis required to review this project and available staff resources will affect the actual review time. The timeline can also be impacted by one or more of the following: • any request made by the Division for additional information • changes or revisions requested by the applicant • mutually-agreed-upon· requests to stop the time clock . • preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement • failure to post the property • resolution of land use decisions appeals Enclosed arc instructions for posting the required notice board signs on your property. The notice boards must be posted within 14 days from the date of this letter. Please follow the · instructions and return the enclosed affidavit of posting immediately after the notice boards have · been installed. Complete Application .ew -Proposed Subdivision of the Ma.Jroperty October 26, 2005 Page 2 of 2 If you have any questions about our processing of this application or the posting requirements, please contact me at (206) 296-6632. Sincerely, ~~ Lanny Henoch Program and Project Manager II Current Planning Section, LUSD Enclosures cc: Rebecca Cushman, P.E., Triad Associates Kim Claussen, Program and Project Manager III, Current Planning Section, LUSD ® -·· King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 October 20, 2005 Sara Slatten Cam West Development 9720 NE 120'h Place, Suite I 00 Kirkland, WA 98034 • RE: Permit Fee Estimate -Proposed Preliminary Plat of Martin Property File Number: L05P0019 · Dear Ms. Slatten: Beginning January 2, 2004, our office implemented a new program for managing certain types of permit applications to provide customers with an enhanced level of customer service. The Project Manager Program seeks to provide customers with increased predictability for the permit process and better accountability from County review staff. For permit applications using the Project Manager Program, a project manager is assigned to the permit to facilitate communication.with the applicant and provide a fee estimate to cover the anticipated scope of review. The project manager will also monitor and manage the permit application throughout the review process to ensure that review schedules remain in line with performance standards and the overall work hours are within the range of estimated fees for the project. Your application was received by our office on September 28, 2005. The enclosed information provides a summary of the fee estimate for the anticipated work disciplines and also discusses the submittal process and disclaimers which may affect the final permit fees. Once the attached estimated fee form is signed and submitted to our Department, including payment of the estimated fee, review of your project will continue. · If you have any questions regarding the permit fees or other aspects of the review process, please contact me via email Kimberly.claussen@metrokc.gov or by phone at (206) 296-7167. Sin rely,~ i Claussen, Project Manager III Current Planning Section MAIN FILE COPY 0J,,· ,· U/ • • Enclosures Cc: Lisa Dinsmore, Supervisor Current Planning Section, LUSD w/enc Lanny Henoch, Planner, Current Planning Section, LUSD w/enc Pete Dye, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD w/enc Administrative Section w/enc Application File w/enc I • • For further questions regarding this fee estimate or for other requirements about this permit application, please contact Kim Claussen via email Kimberly.claussen@metrokc.gov or by phone at 206-296-7167. Project Manager III Land Use Services Division (® • King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Land Use Services Division Permit Fee Estimate Application Estimate Number: LOSP0019 Permit Title: Martin Property Permit Type: Preliminary Plat • I Date: 10/20/2005 I Based on permit information submitted by the applicant, the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) has determined the amount of review fees for the subject application. The fees shown below do not include ancillary permit fees, recording fees, project-related mitigation fees, or other fees that are passed through to the applicant from other agencies or as part of the project's environmental review. Fixed Fees: Counter Service Fee for Application Intake Fire Review · Total Fixed.Fees Estimate for Hourly Fees: ( 257 Hours x $144.90) Total Permit Fee Estimate: $483.00 $211.83 $694.83 $37,239.30 $37,934.13 Note: The estimate for hourly fees stated above is based on the total estimated number of hours not to exceed 257. hours for the disciplines listed below, and is calculated using the department's hourly rate in effect at the time the work is performed. Based upon the financial disclosures found on page 2, the number of hours required may be modified. The total estimated hours reflect work performed by the following disciplines: Engineering, Grading, Sensitive Area, Traffic, Parks, Planning, and Project Management. This estimate does not include hours and fees associated with variances and/or adjustments to the King County Roads Standards and Surface Water Design Manual, engineering plans, or additional time associated with the public hearing. After receiving the fee estimate from ODES, the applicant has twenty eight (28) days to return this paperwork, and proceed with an installment plan for the remaining balance due or complete payment. Please call 206-296-6797 to set up an appointment with the Permit Center to complete your payment. If the payment is not received within twenty-eight (28) days, the applicant may be required to obtain a new fee estimate or this application may be cancelled. ® • King County Department Of Development and Environmental Seivices 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Rent.on, WA 98055-1219 Land Use Services Division Permit Fee Estimate Application Estimate Number: L05P0019 Permit Title: Martin Property Permit Type: Preliminary Plat Applicant: Cam West Development • Date: 10/20/2005 Estimated Maximum Hours: 257 Total Fees: $37,934.13 The following disclaimers are attached and are part of the fee estimate for this permit. The applicant is required to submit a signed copy of this form with the application and fee payment acknowledging that the applicant has read the disclaimers stated below. Disclaimer Applicants are responsible for all fixed fees, reported hours performed in reviewing submittal materials and processing, up to the fee estimate. Changes in the scope of the project review will result in a revised review fee estimate. Fee estimates are based on information submitted to DOES by the applicant prior to finalization of the permit application. In addition, estimates are determined by utilizing historical data gathered from projects of similar type, size, and scope. The fee estimate will be the maximum fee charged unless the scope of the project changes. Should fewer hours be required to complete the review, then the applicant may receive a refund for those hours. If items are identified that are not originally disclosed or identified later in the process, a new estimate may be required. Applicants will be responsible for any additional hours identified in a new estimate because of: ' 1) Changes in the project and unknown or undisclosed site issues 2) Incomplete information or errors in applicant submittal 3) County code fee changes · 4) Incomplete information from applicant 5) Errors in applicant information or submittal 6) County code fee changes 7) Appeals & public hearing(s) 8) Excessive Citizen inquiries, questions, etc. 9) Environmental Impact Statement 10) Additional Review for documents not provided with the initial submittal: a) King County Road Variance application b) Surface Water Design Adjustment, etc. Keeping review fees at or below the fee estimate will depend on the applicant's commitment to complete the process review. Acknowledged: _______________ _ Applicant/Owner Name (signature) Date Applicant/Owner Name (print) ® • ' • ,. \··REQUEST · FOR King County SCHOOL INFORMATION PRELIMINARY PLATS Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 DATE: October 3, 2005 TO: Issaquah School District FM: Kim Claussen, Program/Project Manager Ill RE: Proposed Short Subdivision LUSD File No: L05P0019 -Martin Property Subdivision The Land Use Services Division (LUSD) has received an application for a subdivision in your District. Enclosed is a copy of the (revised) plat map received by the Land Use Services Division on September 28, 2005. In order for us to adequately evaluate this proposal, provide the most accurate information to the public, and for LUSD to serve the School District better, please provide us with the following information: Which schools do you anticipate the students living in this subdivision would attend? Elementary _________________________ _ Jr. High/Middle _______________________ _ Sr. High __________________________ _ Will the students walk or be bussed to these schools? Elementary _________________________ _ Jr. High/Middle ______________________ _ Sr. High __________________________ _ If the students will be bussed, where do you anticipate the bus stops will be located? If that information is not available at this time, currently, where are the closest bus stops located to this site? Elementary _________________________ _ Jr. High/Middle _______________________ _ Sr. High __________________________ _ Other Comments: _________________________ _ Please complete this form and return it by October 28. 2005 to the address below. If you have questions regarding this proposal, please call Kim Claussen at 206-296-7167. Thank you very much. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATTN: Lanny Henoch / Program/Project Manager II 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 . MAIN \FIL.le. COl?Y • • CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: November 5, 2009 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M. Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office - Project Name: MARTIN PROPERTY y \I LUA (file} Number: LUA-09-117 Cross-References: KC File # LOSP0019 AKA's: Project Manager: Acceptance Date: 10/25/2005 Applicant: Cam West Development Owner: Kenneth Martin Contact: Cam West Development PID Number: 1023059383 ERC Decision Date: ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Approval: 4/3/2007 Appeal Period Ends: 4/17/2007 Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: KC Date: 4/3/2007 Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: Subdivision of 3.71 acres into 31 lots in the R-4 zone Location: West of 148th Ave SE, south of SE 125th St. and north of NE 5th. Comments: Denislaw ·• Mayor October 23, 2009 John Harkness Cam West Development, Inc. 9720 NE 120th Place, Ste #100 Kirkland, WA 98034 Department of Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Request for Extension of Project's Period of Validity Martin Preliminary Plat/ City of Renton File LUA09-117 Dear Mr. Harkness: This office has reviewed your request (dated September 30, 2009) to extend the validity period of the above referenced preliminary plat (File No. LUA09-117), which will expire on April 3, 2012. Section 4-7-080L of the Renton Municipal Code, relating to preliminary plats, authorizes the City to approve a single one-year extension of the usual five-year expiration. Requests for one- year exte~sions are reviewed closer to, but at least 30 days in advance, of the expiration date in order for the applicant to demonstrate that he/she has attempted in good faith to submit the final plat within the five year period. Therefore, your request for the standard one-year extension is hereby denied. Under Ordinance No. 5452 (RMC 4-1-080F) authorization has been given to the.Planning Director to approve· an additional two-year extension beyond the standard extensions possible under the Code for any land use or subdivision project that was valid on or after April 1, 2009. As the single one-year extension has not been exercised your extension under Ordinance No. 5452 is also hereby denied. Please note that your application remains active and you still have the right to seek extensions under the terms specified. You may call Rocale Timmons at (425) 430-7219 should you have any further questions. Sincerely, 1 / C. <Z-. \J '-"~---+ C.E. "Chip" Vincent Planning Director cc: City of Renton File No. LUA09-117 Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov • September 30, 2009 Chip Vin9ent Planning Director City of Renton I 055 -S. Grady°Wai Renton, WA 98057 • City of Renton P/anninf} Division . SUBJECT: MARTIN -'PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL-EXTENSION REQUEST Cain West Development is respect(ully requesting extension of the -Preli~inary Plat Approval for the project known as Martin. I will start with some background related to this project as you may not be familiar with it.. The project ~as approved by the King ~ounty Hearing Examiner on April'3, 2007 and subsequently has been in the engineering revi_ew · process with King County. In· Spring of 2009 ·the property was annexed into the City of Repton·and Cam West has been working with staff to get /Ill the.information together and hopefully move the project to review and ultimately approval o_f the engineering. As you ·. know, .this is a difficult and long process since a significant ·amount of:information and history must come from King County and be deciphered by ihe City .of Renton before mo-:ing forward with revi~w. · · · · . • I ~ • For these reasons, as well as the continued poor economic· climate, Camw·est would like to · extend the Preliminary Plat approval ·to the maximum t_imefraine allowable by the City of · Renton. This added time will a!low Cam west to work through the transfer of information, : r~view and approval process witli the City of Renton that is along with flexibility in starting ~ite.development at a more economically beneficial time. ' Cc: Jennifer Henning, Rocale' Timmons . . ' -. Laureen M. Nicolay From: Sent: To: Subject: • • Laureen M. Nicolay Monday, September 21, 2009 11 :34 AM Jennifer T. Henning; Stacy Tucker; Kayren K. Kittrick Martin Property LUA09-117, 13-Lot Approved Preliminary Plat Transferred from County in Construction Stage This one is ready for Stacy to prep to send to the Clerk's Office. It should be still be assigned so we can send them a letter with their new staff contacts 13-LOT PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH TRACTS TRANSFERRED 9-21-09 FROM KC WITH PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL AND MDNS, BUT PRIOR TO RECORDING. SEVERAL UTILITY PERMITS ARE ATTACHED THAT WERE ISSUED IN 2007, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN FINALED. COUNTY APPROVAL WAS SUBJECT TO 18 CONDITIONS. Laureen Nicolay, Senior Planner City of Renton Development Planning 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425) 430-7294 phone (425) 430-7231 fax lnicolay@rentonwa.gov 1 - • • MINUTES OF THE MARCH 22, 2007, PUBLIC HEARING ON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FILE NO. L05P0019. James N. O'Connor was the Hearing Examiner in this matter. Participating in the hearing were Karen Scharer, Pete Dye, Kristen Langley and Ray Floren! representing the Department; Robert Johns representing the Applicant, and Andy Phung and Safe! Basic. The following Exhibits were offered and entered into the record: t-4hibit No.t'-J DOES file no. L05P0019 L,El11iibit No. 2 "-.i DOES March 22, 2007, preliminary report for file no. L05P0019, with attachments as follow: • 2.1. Plat Map w/13 Lot Plat Design 2.2. City of Renton Sewer Availability 2.3. Surface Water Management Variance/L06V0043 2.4. Density Calculations w/R-4 zoning 2.5. ROW/Easement Exhibit, 2 pages ~ibit No. 3 \ Application for land use permit/plat no. L05POO 19 received 9/28/2005 ...... Exhibit No. 4 ~ SEPA Checklist received 9/28/2005 <--Exhibit No. 5 \.J SEPA Mitigated Determination ofNonsignificance issued 1/26/2007 c.-Exhibit No. 6 "J Affidavit of posting for Notice of Application indicating posting date of 11/4/2005; received by DOES on 11/8/2005 \.-Exhibit No. 7 \ Revised Site plan (13 lot preliminary plat map) received 4/21/2006 ~ibit No. 8 \i Assessor's maps (2) -SE I 0-23-05 & SW 11-23-05 (Jb(hibit No. 9 \i Level I Downstream Analysis by Triad Associates, date received 9/28/2005 /,6hibit No. I~ Traffic Impact Analysis by Transportation Engineering North West, received 4/21/2006 ~ibit No. 11 \, Request for School Information Form from Issaquah School District, received 11/12/2005 c'.Exhibit No. 12'-I Email from Sara Slatten to Noreen Anderson dated 4/6/2005, with 14 pages of attachments tfilhibit No. I~ Vicinity Map for L05P0019, L03P0018 & L02P0005, prepared by KC staff on 3/19/2007 l&hibit No. 14..'\J DOES Field Report and GIS Information dated 11/3/2005 ~ibit No. 15 \J Letter (with 17 attachments) from A Phung, received 4/18/2006 v£'511ibit No. 110! Email to & from A Phung, re: ownership of 16' wide strip, dated 11/23/2005 I/Exhibit No: I j'J Email (with 7 attachments) from Safe! Basic re: road improvements & flooding dated 2/6/2006 v"lfxhibit No. 18 \J Letter from Sara Slatten re: response to request for information & Phung/ownership, dated 6/22/2006 e,,6hibit No. 19\ Email from Sara Slatten dated 7/12/2006 regarding Summary of An Phung discussions, forwarded by Kim Claussen on 7/13/2006 with 3 attachments ~it No. 20\i Letter (with enclosures -3 pages) from Eric Campbell of Cam West to A Phung re: resolution of property ownership, etc, dated 9/14/2005 ~hibit No. 21 '\J 1121/2005 email from Safet Basic regarding property lines & noise with undated response from Lanny Henoch ~ibit No. 22'\J 11/28/2005 email from K & C Gilbert with 11/29/2005 response re: sewer extension to / their property "E;Sl>ibit No. 23~ Email from Ray Floren! re: ownership documentation, dated 6/22/2006 -'Elih:1bit No. 24,_ \/ Email from Ray Florent re: ownership documentation, dated 6/28/2006 ibit No. Z? \J Letter from A Phung, re: property ownership, dated 3/19/2007 Exhibit No. 26\/ Testimony of Raymond Floren! dated 3/22/2007 C .-' TYPES 3 and 4 FILE CONTENTS / LOG SHEET (Format Plat, Rezone, Special Use, Shoreline Redesignation) FILE NUMBER: L05P0019 HEARING DA TE(si, _ __,:::,.,_\.µa""""o::=it..,,o.,_M-1---- PLAT/PROJECT NAME: MARTIN PROPERTY CONTINUANCE HEARING DATE(S), __ ~-~ PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO.: J),}:] -0~ PLANNER: Lanny Henoch ENGINEER: Pete Dye RELATED APPLICATION & FILE NO. A05PM260 APPLICATION FILED (date): 09/28/05 EXAMINER DECISION/REC: ~\.\~-?>~--D~J ______ _ COMPLETEAPPLICATION(date): ,;o/U::,/P;r-APPEALFILED: ONO· DYES date:. ____ _ A. COUNCIL ACTION: ORDINANCE NO.: EFFECTIVE DATE: HEARING DA TE(S) - I. D NOTICE OF APPEAL 2. D APPEAL ARGUMENTS ~ HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTIONS I. D PREHEARING CONF. NOTICE date(s): 2. _¢ HEARING NOTICE date(s): 3 D PREHEARING ORDER date(s): 4 0 CONTINUATION date(s): 5. "iiJ REPORT date(s): ~\)Aft,"] 6 D RECONSIDERATION date(s): 7. 0 APPEAL SUMMARY date(s): ~ DDES STAFF ACTIONS I. D CONTINUATIONNOTICE 2. f'A. REPORT date mailed: ------ date mailed: ~----- 3. .D ADDENDUM REPORT date mailed: _____ _ 4. 'tJ TRANSMITTAL TO EXAMINER (POR's/DOCS/STUDIES) date sent: _c..!....<""'3..l-"'--'.---i.--- 5 . ../ c:i'PROPOSED ORDINANCE NUMBER EMAIL TO THE KC CLERKS OFFICE date sent: -~"""'c.µ.L.1--- @ SEPA REQUIREMENTS G:) THREsHoLD DETERMINATION, \'<\ DN.:\ DATE 1ssUED, ilo~) ()"°'1 (~ DATE 500' RADIUS/AGENCIES/PORS/STAFF SENT: _ ___:\L\+<a;;,.._,,\.i><-1\_,<...,1c.:"1C1.----------~ 1 1 3. APPEAL FILED: D YES D NO a. APPELLANTS: -------------- b. APPEAL ARGUMENTS: ----------- date received: -------- date received: -------- date received: -------- date received: -------- date received: -------- date received: -------- '· · .. ..:, .. ~ ' • •• ~BLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENT '-1:"" NOTICE OF APPLICATION ·, a) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING/POSTING PACKAGE SENT lt>~0t;;" REC'D "-b) LEGAL AD SEATTLE TIMES date(s) sent: ~:z~f datepublished: LOCALS date(s) sent: __ Zf. __ date published: '-c) 500' RADIUS/AGENCIES/POR's/STAFF date(s) sent: /t /9: 6.c: G NOTICE OF RECOMMENDATION/PUBLIC HEARING L05P0019 ....._ a) LEGAL AD SEA TTLlbTI¥ESl'.J date(s) sent: date published: LOCALS f\eOll!'fl ~eoo(s) sent:--1,-+"-c._+-"\)'-'---_date published:_._..,.'---'-'-~- ., b) 500' RADIUS/AGENCIESIPOR's/STAFFI date sent: 1/d,Ui(O? QAPPLICATION Date received: September 28, 2005 L ~TAKE CHECKLIST D APPLICATION FEE l!!f" 9PLICANT DESIGNATION FORM ia"'LEGAL DESCRIPTION 13"i(SSESSOR'S MAPS: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. ------------------------ ~ER TI FICA TE OF WATER AVAILABILITY 8. 9. i7 CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITY D PRELIMINARY HEALTH.APPROVAL 0 S)lRTIFICATE OF FUTURE CONNECTION 10. ~IRE DISTRICT RECEIPT l l. r;£ SI]jl PLANIPLA T MAP 12. ~AL LOT PROOF 13. [B"' 9fIDA VIT CONCERNING CRITICAL AREAS COMPLIANCE 14. 0'°'1}NVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST · 15. ig/T~NSPORTATION CONCURRENCY 16. &"LEVEL ONE DRAINAGE ANALYSIS 17. ~THER ()W5/7Y (?/V e,,J 18. D WAIVER(S} _____________ _ ~ ADDITIONAL PLANS/MAPS L CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN DA TES RECEIVED: 2. WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN ~ .REVISION NO. l 4. REVISION NO. 2 5. REVISION NO. 3 6. REVISION NO. 4 7. OTHER MAPS a) \l,c.,"~~.C.r LOS\>oc\"\ , l !;) ;\f'QD\'R, +\od,. ~CDC s b} _________________ _ c}, _________________ _ d}, _______________ _ e), _________________ _ !) _________________ _ r l .~ .. .. • . ,lfllljf' -~ L05P0019 @SPECIAL STUDIES DATES RECEIVED 9/,,;,g,d;,c <.J<' WETLAND/STREAM REPORT t..,:k GEOTECHNICAL REPORT 3. TRAFFIC STUDY 4. WILDLIFE STUDY 5. OTHER (document title} _____________ _ 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. IL IJll\.~B.\-J::l:5-~~lli~!L__~~~~~L::X----I'i.QUU~:!u.Yl.U'>\---- 13. £/Oce/01,p fu:oa; Q Coro()')--Sott± 'Busic -lo Lrl,¥\ , Lr\£.V1 :\a INju~c, 14. O;?. /0'9/Ql,e £roo-:Jl C Cl'fY\JX\· S,.,.f,::\-:B0,s.ic. --b l \;:\rr'.l, no:l;no, -.Q (?df ,,,(l)bn:\:os, FPf-.-fu-M. 15. o::i,l!o/olt> 16ee,; :for add.. iofu. :ID Caw L\les+ Uc..vd~,''oii fiuo::i LH:U\ 16. @/1':l tDlD sou·, o C>c\Ybtf\ ces~x. ±o --Chl~.1'.'1 :6::rto-,, LJ-\eK'I 17. oa,l;),0/ole SnM~ e,c,np'Y) T~j'J/\ -1:o R f\o'(U):\:1 cc..£ D'-je t Lf+e D 18. 03/a;.Jo1p lecM X'{\a:oo,o-.!)rl,.uYY\ :tE-N\N :To V,, kan3\~ :kM1s. ~-bJW ~~: ::~: :J:C:t;;~;t~ ~F, 1 ~ ;~1~~+ co:°vn ~~:: 21. oYt:;21,/0\i> ,;ir..l AddenJ.uM 'i<ryies.± £x AAd.ln{i?. I( Scr\/1 :l:o Ca\'.Y\ \.ue\\t 22. ocom}Olo fu\;ro -Pl?.± To511.broi M =1Ec9,, Co.m /Ale&± ±o I~ &.h.c<- ~::; ~;,~:~:~ 3~!ol:~:!;t~1:c."\SZ;~:ro~~2:::::,j:~~. L~os. R~~ ~~· 25. 01 {as:/olo 3'°' PrAAr.ol.11M Rea . .fu< \?tt:ld. \l')-fu. , il\c\. eN rco.1hror"':\:s \( 3® -1-b Ca MWes+ v 26. )O/o?,!Ofo &ra·d com,n. Rf::: fuse,neot:'.plowsa3e 4•j"O +o Co.WIUlts\:, Cc l'i&ho.,11.r\llv- 27. 10/txs/Ow 1Iro:<: f:.':l:h!'.\s1QC1 :SixS1A'c>ro;th,,D oEl\dd. )frp?, \'<,,':Y:DP.. :it> Caro u Jcs.± 28. 10/31/o{o fh.\ioo. \?la± Resu'omita.D :t:-3 C'o;m I.& le,:')± :\:o '6. S: loo. 29. 1~1s1 L f~ ;~n1. Orrlilfl. ~~ =~:i±n Q i-3 C' om \ Des+ :\o K &.\:w-- 30. '__'3.!!'.>_~1 ~ll:_F-_ _J-7 ~"(W1\l_~ ~-)_:_ 31. ~~~ \u.+:z~:J:: '<~kloce~ . 32. L~ ~-~ ... ==l-s<-14 ~ ~.; ,L Scb ... ....,n,., 33. 34. 35. ,.. I ., ... • • ' . April 3, 2007 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER REPORT AND DECISION KING COUNTY, WASIDNGTON 400 Yesler Way, Room 404 Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 296-4660 Facsimile (206) 296-1654 Email: hearex@metrokc.gov SUBJECT: Department of Development and Environmental Services File No. LOSP0019 Proposed Ordinance no. 2007-0082 Location: Applicant: King County: MARTIN Preliminary Plat Application 120 feet west of 148th Avenue Southeast, 100 feet south of Southeast 125th Street and 100 feet north of Northeast 5th Street, Renton Cam West Real Estate Dev., lnc. represented by Robert Johns, Attorney Johns Momoe Mitsunaga 1601 -I 14th Ave. SE,# 110 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Telephone: (425) 467-9960 Facsimile: (425) 451-2818 Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) represented by Karen Scharer 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Telephone: (206) 296-7114 Facsimile: (206) 296-7051 QQAl\\a FILE COPY SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS/DECISION: Department's Preliminary Recommendation: Department's Final Recommendation: Examiner's Decision: EXAMINER PROCEEDINGS: Hearing Opened: Hearing Closed: Approve, subject to conditions Approve, subject to conditions (modified) Approve, subject to conditions (modified) March 22, 2007 March 22, 2007 'ls-s • • ' L05POOJ 9 · Martin Page 2 of 13 Participants at the public hearing and the exhibits offered and entered are listed in the attached minutes. A verbatim recording of the hearing is available in the office of the King County Hearing Examiner. ISSUES AND TOPICS ADDRESSED: • Access • Surface water drainage • Property ownership and encroachments SUMMARY: The proposed subdivision of 3.71 acres into 31 lots in the urban area is approved subject to conditions. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: I. General Information: Developer: Engineer: STR: Location: Parcel: Zoning: Acreage: Number of Lots: Density: Lot Size: Proposed Use: Sewage Disposal: Water Supply: Fire District: School District: Camwest Real Estate Development, Inc. 9720 NE I 20th Place, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 Contact: Sara Slatten 425-825-1955 Triad Associates 12112115th Ave NE Kirkland, WA 98034 Contact: Gerry Buck 425-821-8448 10-23-05 120 feet west of 148th Ave SE; 100 feet south of SE 125h St., and 100 feet north of NE 5th St. (Renton) 102305 9383 R-4 3.71 acres 13 Approximately 3.5 units per acre 6,700 -7,600 square feet in size Single Family Detached Dwellings City of Renton Water District# 90 City of Renton Issaquah School District Complete Application Date: October 26, 2005 ' . • • L05P0019-Martin Page 3 of 13 2. Except as modified herein, the facts set forth in the King County Land Use Services Division's preliminary report to the King County Hearing Examiner for the March 22, 2007, public hearing are found to be correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. The LUSD staff recommends approval of the application, subject to conditions. 3. This proposed subdivision is south and east of the plat of Shamrock. Access to this subdivision will be from 148th Avenue Southeast, through the north portion of Shamrock, and from Northeast 4th Street, through the south portion of Shamrock. This plat will participate in funding a traffic signal and associated improvements being constructed at the intersection of SR 900 and 148th Avenue Southeast, to mitigate its adverse impacts to that intersection and the intersection of 164th Avenue Southeast and SR 900. This subdivision will also construct road frontage and off-site improvements along Southeast 125th Street, west from the project entrance, to connect with 144th Place Southeast, to provide access to the south. These improvements are planned to be constructed partly on right-of-way dedicated to King County by the recorded plat of Shamrock. The adjacent property owner claims an interest in a portion of the Southeast 125th Street right-of-way dedicated by Shamrock. However, King County does not recognize that interest as impairing the right-of-way dedication. In the event it is determined through legal proceedings that the property to the west is not available as dedicated right-of-way, the access to the Martin plat from the north would be sufficient to serve this development without an alternative access to the west and south. 4. The Martin property slopes down from east to west. No surface water runoff from the planned development of the Martin property will flow onto the adjacent properties to the east. 5. There will be no access to any of the Jots within the proposed subdivision directly from 148th A venue Southeast. The strip of land approximately 120 feet by 15 feet, that is shown as a panhandle of proposed lot 5, will be segregated from lot 5 and established as a separate tract. 6. All students residing within the subject property will be bussed to the elementary, junior high and high schools that serve the area. The bus stop that is proposed to serve students within this plat will be located at Southeast !24th Street and 148th Avenue Southeast. With the construction of urban improvements within this subdivision, safe walking conditions will exist from all lots within this plat to the bus stop. Improvements necessary to be made on 148th A venue Southeast to provide for a safe bus loading zone will be constructed by other developments that are required to make improvements to 148th Avenue Southeast. The subject property has no frontage on 148th Avenue Southeast, other than the 15 foot wide "panhandle" tract thaf is used for a driveway to an adjacent property owner's garage. CONCLUSIONS: I. If approved subject to the conditions recommended below, the proposed subdivision will comply with the goals and objectives of the King County Comprehensive Plan, subdivision and zoning codes, and other official land use controls and policies of King County. 2. If approved subject to the conditions recommended below, this proposed subdivision will make appropriate provision for the public health, safety and general welfare, and for open spaces, • • LOSPOO 19 -Martin Page 4 of 13 drainage ways, streets, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supply, sanitary waste, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds and safe walking conditions for students who only walk to school; and it will serve the public use and interest. 3. The conditions for final plat approval recommended below are in the public interest and are reasonable and proportionate requirements necessary to mitigate the impacts of the development upon the environment. 4. The dedications of land or easements within and adjacent to the revised preliminary plat, as required for final plat approval or as shown on the proposed preliminary plat submitted by the Applicant on April 21, 2006, are reasonable and necessary as a direct result of the development of this proposed plat, and are proportionate to the impacts of the development. 5. The applicant has agreed to provide off site improvements on the alignment of Southeast 125th Street, between the plat entrance road and 144th Place Southeast, in order to provide improved access to future residents of the subdivision, as well as the residents of the adjacent plat of Shamrock to the north and west of the subject property. In the event dedicated right-of-way is not available to complete those improvements, access to the north only will be sufficient to adequately serve the proposed subdivision. 6. The proposed plat of Martin will have no adverse impact upon surface water drainage that affects, or will affect, the adjacent properties lying between the Martin plat and 148th Avenue Southeast. DECISION: The proposed preliminary plat of Martin, as revised and received on April 21, 2006, is approved, subject to the following conditions of final plat approval: I. Compliance with all platting provisions of Title 19A of the King County Code. 2. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final plat a dedication that includes the language set forth in King County Council Motion No. 5952. 3. The plat shall comply with the base density and minimum density requirements of the R-4 zone classification. All lots shall meet the minimum dimensional requirements of the R-4 zone classification or shall be shown on the face of the approved preliminary plat, whichever is larger, except that minor revisions to the plat which do not result in substantial changes may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environment Services. All plat boundary discrepancies shall be resolved to the satisfaction of DD ES prior to the submittal of the final plat documents. As used in this condition, "discrepancy" is a boundary hiatus, an overlapping boundary or a physical appurtenance which indicates an encroachment, lines of possession or a conflict of title. 4. The applicant must obtain final approval from the King County Health Department. • • LOSPOOl 9 -Martin Page 5 of 13 5. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the King County Road Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No. 11187, as amended (1993 KCRS). 6. The applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main, and fire flow standards of Chapter 17 .08 of the King County Code. All future residences constructed within this subdivision are required to be sprinklered (NFPA 13D) unless the requirement is removed by the King County Fire Marshal or his/her designee. The Fire Code requires all portions of the exterior walls of structures to be within 150 feet (as a person would walk via an approved route around the building) from a minimum 20-foot wide, unobstructed driving surface. To qualify for removal of the sprinkler requirement, driving surfaces between curbs must be a minimum of 28 feet in width when parking is allowed on one side of the roadway, and a minimum of36 feet in width when parking is permitted on both sides. The road width requirement applies to both on-site access and roads accessing the subdivision. Storm Drainage 7. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location oflots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval, which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. a. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual. DDES approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. b. Standard plan notes and a construction sequence as specified in the King County drainage manual shall be shown on the engineering plans (Reference Section 7B). c. A storm water pollution prevention and spill (SWPPS) plan shall be included with the project engineering plans as required in Chapter 2 of the drainage manual. d. Storm water facilities shall be designed using the KCRTS conservation flow control standard. Water quality facilities shall also be provided using the basic water quality protection menu. If the proposed onsite storm water pond is used as a wet pond for water quality treatment, the facility shall be revised as necessary to comply with requirements for a 3: 1 flow path for water quality treatment as outlined in the drainage manual. e. To implement the required Best Management Practices (BMP's) for treatment of storm water, the final engineering plans and technical information report (TIR) shall clearly demonstrate compliance with all applicable design standards. The requirements for best management practices are outlined in Chapter 5 of the drainage manual. The design engineer shall address the applicable requirements on the final engineering plans and L05P0019-Martin • • Page 6 of 13 provide all necessary documents for implementation. The final recorded plat shall include all required covenants, easements, notes, and other details to implement the required BMP's for site development. f. All runoff control facilities shall be located in a separate tract and dedicated to King County unless portions of the drainage tract are used for recreation space in accordance with KCC 21A.14.180. g. During preliminary review, the applicant received approval for a drainage adjustment (L06V0043) regarding the building setbacks for constructing an offsite drainage pipe within the adjacent plat of Shamrock. The final engineering plans shall show the design requirements for constructing the offsite pipe and demonstrate compliance with all conditions of approval as listed in the drainage adjustment decision. To assure adequate capacity is provided for conveyance of storm water from the onsite detention pond, the overflow system and conveyance pipe shall be designed at a minimum for the I OOyear storm based upon developed site conditions. h. As depicted by field topography on the site plans, an upstream drainage basin is located east of the subject property. The final engineering plans shall be designed to address any requirements for bypass of upstream drainage as described on page 1-42 in the drainage manual. Due to groundwater conditions on the site, the design engineer shall also evaluate the need for interceptor trenches and easements for conveyance of drainage. As shown in applicants drainage report site map, an existing french drain is located in the eastern portion of the site which should be removed or relocated. Based upon the final designs, drainage easements may be required to convey surface or ground water through the project. 1. As shown on the applicant's preliminary site plans, the existing storm system located near the west property line shall be removed during site construction. The existing pipes and catch basins shall be shown on the final engineering plans with applicable notes and/or design requirements for removal. Access/Roads 8. The proposed subdivision shall comply with the 1993 King County Road Standards (KCRS) including the following requirements: a. Road A shall be improved as an urban minor access street. b. The frontage road (SE 1251h St) along Tract A shall be improved full width as an urban subaccess street and shall extend westerly from the project entrance at 1461h Ave SE to 1441h Place within the Shamrock plat. Sixteen feet of additional right-of-way shall be dedicated for completion of the road improvements. A temporary cul-de-sac located on lots 38 and 39 within the Shamrock plat shall be removed upon completing the road connection. Design standards for removing a temporary cul-de-sac are provided in KCRS 2.08D. In the event off site right-of-way is not available to construct improvements to connect with 144th Place Southeast, Southeast 125th Street shall be improved in the manner stated above to the west boundary of the Martin plat. A • • L05P0019 · Martin Page 7 of 13 temporary cul-de-sac or other provision for emergency vehicle tum around may be required by the King County Fire Marshal. c. As shown on the preliminary plat map, an existing easement for ingress and egress is located along the north boundary of the plat and extends easterly to 148th Ave SE. Any rights of direct vehicular access to 148th Avenue Southeast granted to the Martin property by this easement shall be extinguished prior to or concurrent with final plat recording. d. Street trees shall be included in the design of all road improvements, and shall comply with Section 5.03 of the KCRS. e. Modifications to the road standards shown above may be considered by King County pursuant to the variance procedures in KCRS 1.08. f. (Deleted) 9. There shall be no direct vehicular access between this plat and 1481 • Ave SE, except for the existing driveway that serves the abutting property from the 15 foot wide "panhandle" tract. A note to this effect shall appear on the engineering plans and the final plat. 10. Off-site access to the subdivision shall be over a full-width, dedicated and improved road which has been accepted by King County for maintenance. If the proposed access road has not been accepted by King County at the time of recording, then said road shall be fully bonded by the applicant of this subdivision. 11. (Deleted) Mitigation/Impact Fees 12. The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by the applicable fee ordinance. The applicant has the option to either: (!) pay the MPS fee at the final plat recording, or (2) pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the plat that reads, "All fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), have been paid." If the second option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of building permit application. 13. Lots within this subdivision are subject to King County Code 21A.43, which imposes impact fees to fund school system improvements needed to serve new development. As a condition of final approval, fifty percent (50%) of the impact fees due for the plat shall be assessed and collected immediately prior to the recording, using the fee schedules in effect when the plat receives final approval. The balance of the assessed fee shall be allocated evenly to the dwelling units in the plat and shall be collected prior to building permit issuance. - • • LOSPOO 19 -Martin Recreational Area Page 8 of 13 14. The plat shall provide suitable recreation space consistent with the requirements ofK.C.C. 2 IA.14.180 and K.C.C. 21A. 14.190 (i.e., children's play equipment, sport court[s], picnic table[s], benches, etc.). Other a. A detailed recreation space plan (i.e., location, area calculations, dimensions, landscape specs, equipment specs, etc.) shall be submitted for review and approval by DDES prior to or concurrent with the submittal of engineering plats. b. A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording of the plat. 15. A homeowners' association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction ofDDES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the recreation, open space and/or sensitive area tract(s). 16. To implement K.C.C. 16.82 which applies to the site, a detailed tree retention plan shall be submitted with the engineering plans for the subject plat. The tree retention plan (and engineering plans) shall be consistent with the requirements of K.C.C. 16.82, as well as the conceptual tree retention plan ( dated April 21, 2006). No clearing of the subject property is permitted until the final tree retention plan is approved by LUSD. Flagging and temporary fencing of trees to be retained shall be provided, consistent with K.C.C. 16.82 The placement of impervious surfaces, fill material, excavation work, or the storage of construction materials is prohibited within the fenced areas around preserved trees, except for grading work permitted pursuant to K.C.C. 16.82. 17. Street trees shall be provided as follows (per KCRS 5.03 and K.C.C. 2\A.16.050): a. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. b. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. c. If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. d. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the county has adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. • • L05POOl9. Martin Page 9 of 13 SEPA e. The species of trees shall be approved by ODES iflocated within the right-of-way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. f. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by DOES prior to engineering plan approval. g. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DOES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. h. A landscape inspection fee shall also be submitted prior to plat recording. The inspection fee is subject to change based on the current county fees. 18. The following have been established by SEPA as necessary requirements to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of this development. The applicants shall demonstrate compliance with these items prior to final approval. !.) To mitigate the significant adverse impact the plat of Martin will have on the intersections of SR 9001148th Ave SE and SR 9001164th Ave SE, the applicant shall install, either individually or in conjunction with other development projects in this area, the following improvements at the SR 9001148th Ave intersection: • A traffic signal, and • Eastbound and westbound left tum lanes The design for the SR 9001148th Ave intersection improvements shall be approved by the Washington State Department of Transportation (and by King County to the extent such improvements are located in County right-of-way). In addition, at a minimum, the existing entering sight distance looking east for the north and south legs of the intersection (602 feet and 386 feet, respectively) shall not be reduced as part of the intersection improvements. Documentation shall be submitted to show this requirement is met. All construction work associated with the intersection improvements shall be completed between April J" and September 30th. This seasonal restriction shall be clearly shown on the final engineering plans. In lieu of the installation of the above-noted intersection improvements prior to final plat approval, the applicant may post a financial guarantee with WSDOT which assures the installation of these improvements within two years of the recording of Martin. In this event, intersection improvement design must be approved by WSDOT prior to King County approval of the engineering plans for Martin. If the above-noted intersection improvements have already been made by others prior to the recording of Martin, or a financial guarantee has been posted by others which assures the • • LOSPOO 19 -Martin Page 10 of 13 installation of these improvements, then the applicant for Martin shall pay a pro-rata share dollar amount to the developer who has made the improvements or "bonded" for the improvements, in an amount proportional to the impacts of Martin. The pro-rata share dollar amount to be paid shall be set by WSDOT, and documentation shall be provided by the Martin applicant to the King County Land Use Services Division to show this payment has been made, prior to final plat recording. The pro-rata dollar amount to be paid shall be based on the following: • The final Martin lot count • The trip distribution for Martin • The total trips contributed to the intersection of SR 900.1481h Ave by the plats of Aster Park (LOOP0024), Stone Ridge (L99P3008), East Renton (L02P0005), Shamrock (L02POOl4), Rosemonte (aka Ironwood-L03P0018), Martin (L05POOl9) and any future land use applications submitted to King County for which compliance with the King County Intersection Standards (KCC 14.80) is required at either the SR 900/148th Ave intersection, or the SR 900/164th Ave High Accident Location. In the event that either King County or WSDOT adopts a formal "latecomer's" system prior to final plat recording, that system may be followed in lieu of the approach described above, at the discretion of the applicant, as long as at a minimum there is a financial guarantee which assures the above-noted intersection improvements will be installed within two years of the date of recording of the plat of Martin. [Comprehensive Plan Policy T-303 and King County Code 21A.28.060A) 2.) Documentation shall be provided to demonstrate to the satisfaction ofWSDOT that stopping sight distance (360 feet) is available on the east leg of the SR 900/148th Ave intersection. The intersection shall be modified by the applicant, ifnecessary, so that this stopping sight distance requirement is met on the east leg. In addition, the applicant shall clear vegetation within the right-of-way along SR 900, east of 148th Ave., to maximize the entering sight distance for the north and south legs of the intersection. [Comprehensive Plan Policy T-303 and King County Comprehensive Policy T-303 and King County Code 21A.28.060A] ORDERED this 3rd day of April, 2007. TRANSMITTED this 3rd day of April, 2007, to the parties and interested persons ofrecord: Safi! Basic 12601 -148th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Robert D. Johns Johns Monroe Mitsunaga 1601 -I 14th Ave. SE,# 110 Bellevue WA 98004 Joel Delange 12438-148th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Andy T. Phung 9333 -57th Ave. W Mukilteo WA 98275 Keith & Cathy Gilbert 12609 -148th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Christi Schumann 12502 -145th Pl. SE Renton WA 98059 • • L05P0019-Martin Page II ofl3 Seattle KC Health Dept. Sara Slatten Triad Associates E. Dist. Environ. Health Cam West Development 12112 -I 15th Ave. NE 14350 SE Eastgate Way 9720 NE 120th Pl #100 Kirkland WA 98034 Bellevue WA 98007 Kirkland WA 98034 Kim Claussen Lisa Dinsmore Peter Dye DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 Ray Florent Nick Gillen Shirley Goll DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 Kristen Langley Karen Scharer Steve Townsend DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 Larry West Kelly Whiting DDES/LUSD KC DOT, Rd. Srvcs. Div. MS OAK-DE-0100 MS KSC-TR-0231 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL In order to appeal the decision of the Examiner, written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the King County Council with a fee of$250.00 (check payable to King County Office of Finance) on or before April 17, 2007. If a notice of appeal is filed, the original and six ( 6) copies of a written appeal statement specifying the basis for the appeal and argument in support of the appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the King County Council on or before April 24, 2007. Appeal statements may refer only to facts contained in the hearing record; new facts may not be presented on appeal. Filing requires actual delivery to the Office of the Clerk of the Council, Room 1025, King County Courthouse, 516 3•• Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104, prior to the close of business (4:30 p.m.) on the date due. Prior mailing is not sufficient if actual receipt by the Clerk does not occur within the applicable time period. The Examiner does not have authority to extend the time period unless the Office of the Clerk is not open on the specified closing date, in which event delivery prior to the close of business on the next business day is sufficient to meet the filing requirement. If a written notice of appeal and filing fee are not filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date of this report, or if a written appeal statement and argument are not filed within twenty-one (21) calendar days of the date of this report, the decision of the hearing examiner contained herein shall be the final decision of King County without the need for further action by the Council. • • L05P0019-Martin Page 12 of l3 MINUTES OF THE MARCH 22, 2007, PUBLIC HEARJNG ON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FILE NO. L05P0019. James N. O'Connor was the Hearing Examiner in this matter. Participating in the hearing were Karen Scharer, Pete Dye, Kristen Langley and Ray Floren! representing the Department; Robert Johns representing the Applicant, and Andy Phung and Safet Basic. The following Exhibits were offered and entered into the record: Exhibit No. I Exhibit No. 2 DOES file no. L05P0019 ODES March 22, 2007, preliminary report for file no. L05P0019, with attachments as follow: 2.1. Plat Map w/13 Lot Plat Design 2.2. City of Renton Sewer Availability 2.3. Surface Water Management Variance/L06V0043 2.4. Density Calculations w/R-4 zoning 2.5. ROW/Easement Exhibit, 2 pages Exhibit No. 3 Application for land use permit/plat no. L05POOl 9 received 9/28/2005. Exhibit No. 4 SEPA Checklist received 9/28/2005 Exhibit No. 5 SEPA Mitigated Determination ofNonsignificance issued 1/26/2007 Exhibit No. 6 Affidavit of posting for Notice of Application indicating posting date of 11/4/2005; received by DOES on 11/8/2005 Exhibit No. 7 Revised Site plan (13 lot preliminary plat map) received 4/21/2006 Exhibit No. 8 Assessor's maps (2) -SE 10-23-05 & SW 11-23-05 Exhibit No. 9 Level I Downstream Analysis by Triad Associates, date received 9/28/2005 Exhibit No. 10 Traffic Impact Analysis by Transportation Engineering North West, received 4/21/2006 Exhibit No. 11 Request for School Information Form from Issaquah School District, received 11/12/2005 Exhibit No. 12 Email from Sara Slatten to Noreen Anderson dated 4/6/2005, with 14 pages of attachments Exhibit No. 13 Vicinity Map for L05P0019, L03P0018 & L02P0005, prepared by KC staff on 3/19/2007 Exhibit No. 14 DOES Field Report and GIS Information dated 11/3/2005 Exhibit No. 15 Letter (with 17 attachments) from A Phung, received 4/18/2006 Exhibit No. 16 Email to & from A Phung, re: ownership of 16' wide strip, dated 11/23/2005 Exhibit No. 17 Email (with 7 attachments) from Safet Basic re: road improvements&' flooding dated 2/6/2006 Exhibit No. 18 Letter from Sara Slatten re: response to request for information & Phung/ownership, dated 6/22/2006 Exhibit No. 19 Email from Sara Slatten dated 7/12/2006 regarding Summary of An Phung discussions, forwarded by Kim Claussen on 7/13/2006 with 3 attachments • L05P0019-Martin Exhibit No. 20 Exhibit No. 21 Exhibit No. 22 Exhibit No. 23 Exhibit No. 24 Exhibit No. 25 Exhibit No. 26 JNOC:gao L05POOl9 RPT • • Page 13 of 13 Letter (with enclosures-3 pages) from Eric Campbell of Cam West to A Phung re: resolution of property ownership, etc, dated 9/14/2005 1121/2005 email from Safet Basic regarding property lines & noise with undated response from Lanny Henoch 11/28/2005 email from K & C Gilbert with 11/29/2005 response re: sewer extension to their property Email from Ray Floren! re: ownership documentation, dated 6/22/2006 Email from Ray Floren! re: ownership documentation, dated 6/28/2006 Letter from A Phung, re: property ownership, dated 3/19/2007 Testimony of Raymond Floren! dated 3/22/2007 , 1 ,,. I ' I OFFICEOFTHEHEARINGEXAMINER KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 400 Yesler Way, Room 404 Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 296-4660 Facsimile (206) 296-1654 Email: hearex@metrokc.gov January 31, 2007 NOTICE OF HEARINGS SUBJECT: Department of Development and Environmental Services Preliminary Plat Applications Proposed File No. & Name Location Ordinance No. Applicant Information L02P0.005 West of 148th Avenue Southeast 2007-00 I 0 East Renton at approximately Southeast I 20th Street, Renton L03P0018 West of 148th Avenue Southeast 2007-0011 Rosemonte at approximately Southeast I 17th Street, Renton L05P0019 120 feet west of 148th Avenue 2007-0082 Martin Southeast, I 00 feet south of Southeast I 25th Street and I 00 feet north of Northeast 5th Street, Renton C_am West Real Estate Dev., Inc. Attn: Sara Slatten 9720 Northeast 120th Pl., Suite 100 Kirkland, Washington 98034 Telephone: (425) 825-1955 Cam West Real Estate Dev., Inc. Attn: Sara Slatten 9720 Northeast I 20th Pl., Suite I 00 Kirkland, Washington 98034 Telephone: (425) 825-1955 Cam West Real Estate Dev., Inc. Attn: Sara Slatten 9720 Northeast I 20th Pl., Suite I 00 Kirkland, Washington 98034 Telephone: (425) 825-1955 King County: Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) represented by Karen Scharer 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwe1MAIN F Renton, Washington 98055 lLE COPY Telephone: (206) 296-7114 Facsimile: (206) 296-7051 A public hearing has been scheduled on these proposals for 9:30 a.m. on March 22, 2007, in the Department of Development and Environmental Services Hearing Room, 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW, Renton, Washington. Any primary party wishing to reschedule the hearing for a different time or location must make a request in writing to that effect and must obtain the written concurrence of all other primary parties, which shall be submitted to the Hearing Examiner's Office at the above address within 7 days of the date of this notice. Primary parties include the applicant, property owner, and responsible MAIN FILE COPY '} L02P0005, L03POOJ 8 & L05POOJ 9 Page 2 of3 County agency. (Other persons likely to be directly and substantially affected by County action on this proposal may request "party" status by submitting an intervenor petition to the Hearing Examiner.) Agreement to reschedule this proceeding shall constitute waiver by the parties of procedural time limits for its occurrence. A pre-hearing conference may be requested by any primary party prior to March 8, 2007. Hearing Examiner Rule Vill, which is included with this notice, governs pre-hearing conferences. If you are a party to this proceeding and believe a pre-hearing conference should be held prior to the public hearing, submit your written request with specific reasons in support thereof to the King County Hearing Examiner. To promote efficiency in the conduct of hearings and to eliminate surprise, pre-hearing exchange of information is encouraged by the Rules of Procedure. Any person is entitled to receive, at cost, copies of documents in the County file. Application may also be made to the Examiner to direct exchange of other significant information by any person or agency. Mediation of disputes is available pursuant to King County Code Section 20.24.330 and Rules of Mediation. Please contact the Office of the Hearing Examiner if you need a copy of the Rules of Procedure or Rules of Mediation, or obtain the Rules by visiting our web site at www.metrokc.gov/mkcc/hearingexaminer. ORDERED January 31, 2007. PeterT. Donahue King County Hearing Examiner TRANSMITfED January 31, 2007, to the parties and interested persons listed above, and the following: Robert L. Anderson Cam West Devel., Inc. Kristine & Keith Childs PO Box 353 Attn: Sara Slatten 12004 -148th Ave. SE Maple Valley WA 98038 9720 NE !20th Pl. #100 Renton WA 98059 Kirkland WA 98034 Claudia Donnelly John Graves Ralph Hickman 10415 -147th Ave. SE Lozier Homes 9720 NE I 20th Pl. # 100 Renton WA 98059 1203 I 14th Ave. SE Kirkland WA 98034 Bellevue WA 98004 Rebecca Lind Seattle KC Health Dept. Triad Associates City of Renton, EDNSP E. Dist. Environ. Health 12112 -115th Ave NE 1055 S. Grady Way 14350 SE Eastgate Way Kirkland WA 98034 Renton WA 98057 Bellevue WA 98007 Core Design Ursula Eggert Gregg Zimmerman Attn: Robert Stevens 15520 SE I 16th St. City of Renton -Planning 14711 NE 29th Pl., #IOI Renton, WA 98059-6014 1055 S. Grady Way Bellevue, WA 98007 Renton, WA 98057 . ' , (' re \. , L02P0005, L03POOI8 & L05P0019 Page 3 of3 Safit Basic Joel Delange Keith & Cathy Gilbert 12601 -148th Ave. SE 12438-148th Ave. SE 12609 -148th Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Kim Claussen Lisa Dinsmore Peter Dye DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 Nick Gillen Shirley Goll Kristen Langley DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 Karen Scharer Steve Townsend Larry West DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 Kelly Whiting Bruce Whittaker An T. Phung KC DOT, Rd. Srvcs. Div. DDES/LUSD 9333 -57th Ave. W MS KSC-TR-0231 MS OAK-DE-0100 Mukilteo, WA 98275 NOTE: If the Renton School District announces a district-wide school closure due to adverse weather conditions or similar area emergency, the proceeding on this matter will he postponed. Parties of record will he notified of the time and date of the rescheduled proceeding. Any questions regarding postponements and rescheduling can be directed to the Hearing Examiner's Office at (206) 296-4660. PTD:ms Sign language and communication material in alternate formats can be arranged given sufficient notice at 296-4660 (TDD number is 296~ I 024). L02P0005, L03P0018 & L05P0019 NOT Attachment ,..,. • •••• ·=· Rule VIII. A. RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE KING COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER PRE-HEARING CONFERENCES Pmpose and Initiation Pre-hearing conferences promote efficient case management by providing an informal process for early identification of issues and resolution of procedural matters in complex cases. Evidence generally will not be received at a pre-hearing conference, except when required in order for the examiner to rule on a motion. (Pre-marking and introduction of exhibits to which there is no objection may occur at the discretion of the examiner.) The examiner, on motion of any party or upon his/her own motion, may convene a pre-hearing conference to: 1. Identify, clarify, limit or simplify issues. 2. Hear and consider pre-hearing motions. 3. Schedule hearings, identify parties and witnesses, determine the order of and limits upon testimony, obtain stipulations as to facts and law, identify and admit exhibits, order discovery, and consider and act upon any other matter which may aid in the efficient disposition of the hearing. B. Requests for Conference A motion to convene a pre-hearing conference shall be made to the examiner as soon as the need for a conference is recognized by the moving party (at least 21 days prior to the scheduled hearing date), and shall state the reasons for the request, including any motions to be presented. For good cause stated in the motion, the examiner may consider a request that fails to meet the 21-day requirement. For hearings authorized under KCC 20.24.080, a motion by any party for a pre-hearing conference shall be granted if timely. However, unless consented to by all parties or otherwise ordered for good cause by the examiner, no pre-hearing conference on an appeal can be convened later than 45 days after receipt of the statement of appeal by the hearing examiner's office. C. Proceedings at Conference A party who has received timely notice of a pre-hearing conference shall identify at the conference any pre-hearing motions not previously made which he/she intends to make. Parties or interested persons may also file timely written pre-hearing motions for consideration at the pre-hearing conference. Failure to make or disclose a motion which was available to the party at the time of the conference may be grounds for its denial if subsequently made. D. Pre-hearing Order Following a pre-hearing conference, the examiner shall issue an order specifying all items determined at the conference. The order shall be binding upon all parties and interested persons who received timely notice of the conference. Revised March 31, 1995 ' ., ; •. DIRECTIC(,To ODES HEARING RooC.• 900 OAKESDALE AVE SW, RENTON SOUTHBOUND 1-5 EXIT 157 -Martin Luther King Way Tum RIGHT onto 68"' Ave. S. 68'' Ave. S. becomes MONSTER RD. SW Monster Rd. turns into OAKESDALE AVE SW ODES is on your left (building 900) NORTHBOUND 1-5 EXIT 154 to 1-405/WA-518/Burien/Renlon Stay right to 1-405/Renton/Bellevue 1-405 EXIT I to WA-181/W. Valley Hwy. LEFf onto W. Valley Hwy/SR 181 RIGHT onto East Grady Way LEFf onto Oakesdale Ave. SW ODES is on your right (building 900) NORTHBOUND SR 167 Northbound under the 1-405 overpass LEFT at SW 7., St. (2"" light) LEFT onto Oakesdale Ave. SW DDES is on your letl (building 900) SOUTHBOUND 1-405 EXIT 2 to WA-167/Aubum/Rainier Ave. Follow to SR-167 (Valley Fwy.) north LEFf onto SW Grady Way RIGHT onto Oakesdale Ave. SW DOES is on your right (building 900) NORTHBOUND 1-405 EXIT I lo Interurban Ave. S/West Valley Hwy LEFf at light at ramp bottom (north under 1-405) RIGHT onto SW Grady Way LEFf onto Oakesdale Ave. SW ODES is on your right (building 900) SW7'"STREET SWGRAOYWAY -E s G:\working\Misc\Hex\DDES duections.doc 3c ~ "' ~ .. > < "j ~ 0 .. • • King County DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER March 22, 2007 -PUBLIC HEARING AT 9:30 A.M. DDES Hearing Room 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 Phone: (206) 296-6600 PROPOSED PLAT OF MARTIN FILE NO: L05P0019 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO: 2007-0082 A. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION: This is a request for a subdivision of 3.71 acres into 13 lots for detached single- family dwellings. The proposed density is 3.5 dwelling units per acre. The lot sizes are predominately 6,700 -7,600 square feet. See Attachment 1 for a copy of the proposed plat map .. This plat is near (south) of the plats of East Rention/L02P0005 and Rosemonte/L03P0018 which are currently under review by DOES and is scheduled for hearing on the same date as Martin. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: Developer: Engineer: STR: Location: Parcel: Zoning: Acreage: Number of Lots: Density: Lot Size: Proposed Use: Sewage Disposal: Water Supply: Fire District: School District: Camwest Real Estate Development, Inc. 9720 NE 120th Place, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 Contact: Sara Slatten 425-825-1955 Triad Associates 12112115th Ave NE Kirkland, WA 98034 Contact: Gerry Buck 425-821-8448 10-23-05 120 feet west of 1481h Ave SE, 100 feet south of SE 125h St., and 100 feet north of NE 5th St. (Renton). 102305 9383 R-4 3.71 acres 13 Approximately 3.5 units per acre 6,700 -7,600 square feet in size Single Family Detached Dwellings City of Renton Water District# 90 City of Renton Issaquah School District Exhibit No. --=2.=----- liem No. b<::)&:lfs:>t::> L~ Received :> 'Z.<!. • ~1 Complete Application Date: October 26, 2005 King County Hearing Examiner • • C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The Subdivision Technical Committee (STC) of King County has conducted an on- site examination of the subject property. The STC has discussed the proposed development with the applicant to clarify technical details of the application, and to determine the compatibility of this project with applicable King County plans, codes, and other official documents regulating this development. As a result of preliminary discussions, the applicant presented the Technical Committee with numerous revisions with the most recent plat map revision on April 21, 2006. The modifications from the initial submittal include: • Revised Detention Tract increasing the size and adding a rain garden in the tract. • Revised recreational space adding additional area for a total of 10,562 square feet (5,070 sf is required). • Elimination of pond area originally labeled as wetland, as it was determined to be a manmade and is not regulated. • Elimination of a joint use driveway, instead all lots will have separate, direct access to the public street. Other revisions by the applicant not shown on the Plat Plan: • Placement of the Lot 5, 14 foot wide panhandle out to 1481h Ave SE into a separate tract, whereby the tract could be transferred to the adjoining property ownership at some future date. • SWM Adjustment L06V0043 was approved in association with the plat of Shamrock to provide a drainage outlet through an easement in the Shamrock Plat. D. THRESHOLD DETERMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE: Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21 C, the responsible official of LUSD issued a mitigated threshold determination of non- significance (MONS) for the proposed development on January 26, 2007. This determination was based on the review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent documents, resulting in the conclusion that the proposal would not cause probable significant adverse impacts on the environment provided mitigations measures are implemented referencing the following mitigations: 1. To mitigate the significant adverse impact the plat of Martin will have on the intersections of SR 900/148 1h Ave SE and SR 900/1641h Ave SE, the applicant shall install, either individually or in conjunction with other development projects in this area, the following improvements at the SR 900/1481h Ave intersection: • A traffic signal, and • Eastbound and westbound left turn lanes The design for the SR 900/1481h Ave intersection improvements shall be approved by the Washington State Department of Transportation (and by King County to the extent such improvements are located in County right-of- way). In addition, at a minimum, the existing entering sight distance looking east for the north and south legs of the intersection (602 feet and 386 feet, respectively) shall not be reduced as part of the intersection improvements. Documentation shall be submitted to show this requirement is met. All construction work associated with the intersectign improvements shall be completed between April 151 and September 30 1 • This seasonal restriction shall be clearly shown on the final engineering plans. FILE NO L05P0019 Page 2 --------------------------~ • • In lieu of the installation of the above-noted intersection improvements prior to final plat approval, the applicant may post a financial guarantee with WSDOT which assures the installation of these improvements within two years of the recording of Martin. In this event, intersection improvement design must be approved by WSDOT prior to King County approval of the engineering plans for Martin. If the above-noted intersection improvements have already been made by others prior to the recording of Martin, or a financial guarantee has been posted by others which assures the installation of these improvements, then the applicant for Martin shall pay a pro-rata share dollar amount to the developer who has made the improvements or "bonded" for the improvements, in an amount proportional to the impacts of Martin. The pro- rata share dollar amount to be paid shall be set by WSDOT, and documentation shall be provided by the Martin applicant to the King County Land Use Services Division to show this payment has been made, prior to final plat recording. The pro-rata dollar amount to be paid shall be based on the following: • The final Martin lot count • The trip distribution for Martin . • The total trips contributed to the intersection of SR 900.148th Ave by the plats of Aster Park (LOOP0024), Stone Ridge (L99P3008), East Renton (L02P0005), Shamrock (L02P0014), Rosemonte (aka Ironwood - L03P0018), Martin (L05P0019) and any future land use applications submitted to King County for which compliance with the King County Intersection Standards (KCC 14.80) is required at either the SR 9001148th Ave intersection, or the SR 9001164th Ave High Accident Location. In the event that either King County or WSDOT adopts a formal "latecomer's" system prior to final plat recording, that system may be followed in lieu of the approach described above, at the discretion of the applicant, as long as at a minimum there is a financial guarantee which assures the above-noted intersection improvements will be installed within two years of the date of recording of the plat of Martin. [Comprehensive Plan Policy T-303 and King County Code 21A.28.060A] 2. Documentation shall be provided to demonstrate to the satisfaction of WSDOT that stop~ing sight distance (360 feet) is available on the east leg of the SR 900/1481h Ave intersection. The intersection shall be modified by the applicant, if necessary, so that this stopping sight distance requirement is met on the east leg. In addition, the applicant shall clear vegetation within the right-of-way along SR 900, east of 1481h Ave., to maximize the entering sight distance for the north and south legs of the intersection. [Comprehensive Plan Policy T-303 and King County Comprehensive Policy T-303 and King County Code 21A.28.060A] An environmental impact statement (EIS) was not required as a result of issuing the MONS. The appeal period for the revised threshold determination ends at the close of business on February 20, 2007. The specific mitigation measures have been incorporated as part of the applicant's proposal and are included in the list of recommended conditions of preliminary approval. Agencies, affected Native American tribes and the public are offered the opportunity to comment on or appeal the determination until February 20, 2007. E. AGENCIES CONTACTED: 1. King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks: Comments are incorporated in the discussion in this report. 2. King County Fire Protection Engineer: Fire protection engineering preliminary approval has been granted subject to the standard code requirements and requirement for sprinklering of homes unless higher standards for road improvements are met. FILE NO L05P0019 Page 3 • • 3. Issaquah School District: The comments from the district have been incorporated into this report. 4. King County Water District #90: The comments from this district have been incorporated into this report. 5. City of Renton (sewer provider): See Attachment 2. 6. METRO: No response. 7. Washington State Department of Ecology: No response. 8. Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife: No response. 9. Washington State Department of Natural Resources: No Response 10. Washington State Department of Transportation: The comments from WSDOT have been incorporated into the SEPA TD and in this report. F. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT: 1. Topography: The site slopes from the east down to the west with an overall elevation change of approximately 18 feet across the site resulting in slopes of approximately 5 percent or less. 2. Soils: The type of surfaces soils found on this site per King County Soil Survey, 1973, include: The site is classified as AgB -Alderwood gravely, sandy loam; 0-6% slopes. Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight. This soil type has a moderate limitation for low building foundations due to a seasonally high water table, and severe limitations for septic tank filter fields due to very slow permeability in the substratum. Soil exploration was preformed by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. in April of 2003 and geotechnical study was prepared January 27, 2005. Goetechnical staff of DOES has reviewed this report and has concluded that specific geotechnical conditions are not required for plat preliminary approval. 3. Wetland/streams: A wetland/stream report was prepared by C. G. Schultz dated September 26, 2005. One wetland is identified in the report. Subsequent to this report, DOES staff determined that this small feature is manmade and not a wetland, therefore the feature is not regulated under KCC 21A.24. The reference to a wetland feature was eliminated from the plat. 4. Vegetation: The site is primarily covered in pasture grasses. Trees line the property lines on the west half of the site and are clustered near the residence on the central portion of the property. Some of these trees are classified as significant in size and regulated under KCC 16.82 (Grading and Clearing provisions). 5. Wildlife: Small birds and animals undoubtedly inhabit this site, however, the population of species is limited due to increased nearby development. 6. Mapped Critical Areas: The Critical Areas Map Folio does not reference any Critical Area features on the property. G. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The property lies in southeast King County, north of the City of Renton, west of 1481h Ave SE. Via the Plat of Shamrock to the north, 1481h Ave SE provides arterial access. Through the plat of Shamrock on the west, a second access will be available. The site is designated as Urban and is within the urban growth boundary. In recent years FILE NO L05P0019 Page4 • • there have been numerous plats in the local area approved by King County and the City of Renton. This area is in transition from a suburban/rural residential area to a low to medium density urban setting. On this site there is an existing residence and detached garage and other out buildings typical of rural area. This property and other surrounding property in the Urban area are zoned R-4 (Residential -4 du's per acre). Immediate surrounding properties are all developed at urban densities. Directly north of the Martin plat and east of 1461h Ave SE to 1481h Ave. SE is a 16 foot wide strip of land that is owned by interests in Shamrock; the strip provides access easement to the Martin property and to the Phung property. Properties east of 148th Ave SE and north of SE 1201h St. are zoned RA-5 (Rural Area -1 du per 5 acres). Additionally, these properties are outside the Urban Growth Boundary. 1481h Ave SE is a 60 foot public right-of way and the full right-of-way is within the Urban Growth Boundary. H. SUBDIVISION DESIGN FEATURES: 1. Lot Pattern and Density: The proposed lot and street layout is in conformance with King County Codes (i.e. KCC 21A and the 1993 King County Road Standards. Density calculation for the plat is 3.5 dwelling units per the gross 3.71 total acres. Base density would allow up to 15 lots (dwelling units) on the property. Density based on net buildable area of 2.94 acres calculates to 4.4 dwellings per acre. The minimum allowed density requires development of at least 12 lots. The 13 lots proposed generally range from 6,700 to 7,600 square feet in area. See Attachment 5 for the Density & Dimension Calculation Worksheet for further details. It is noted that area on the east portion of the property has encroachments. This area includes the entire Lot 5 panhandle and along the entire east property line. It is estimated by staff that approximately 4,184 square feet is in question do to encroachments. If all of this area were to be excluded from the calculation of plat area, staff estimates the plat area would have a base density of 14 (one unit than requested by the applicant). Therefore, ODES finds there is sufficient documentation supporting that proposed unit count will meet density code requirements in the subsequent phase of engineering should potential adjustments to the property size result. 2. Internal Circulation and Roadway Section: Lots will front onto the internal public street (cul-de-sac) that provides access within the subdivision. Urban road improvements with curb, gutter, and sidewalk for both the internal street and road frontage improvements will be provided. As shown on the preliminary site plans, the frontage road (SE 125th St.) will extend westerly from the project entrance and connect to the existing road at 1441h Place SE within the Shamrock plat. During site development of the Shamrock subdivision, road right-of-way stubs were dedicated at the north and west properly line of the Martin plat to provide public road connections. Development of the Martin property will now complete the road connections and provide better traffic circulation within the neighborhood. An existing temporary cu I- de-sac within the Shamrock plat along 144th Place SE will be removed upon completion of the new road connection to the Martin property. See the proposed plat layout, Attachment 1 to this report. Currently the Martin has easement access over the 16 foot wide strip of land just north of the plat out to 1481h Ave. SE. DDES recommends that the access easement rights of Martin be relinquished off this easement to reduce potential use of the strip for vehicular access. 3. Drainage: The proposed subdivision includes a storm water detention pond located within Tract B shown on the preliminary site plan. In accordance with the 2005 King County drainage manual, the drainage facility will be designed using the conservation flow control standard to minimize the release rate of storm water and reduce potential downstream erosion. The drainage pond will also be designed as a water quality facility to assist in removing pollutants from storm FILE NO L05P0019 Page 5 • • water runoff. After construction and acceptance of the onsite detention pond, the drainage facility will be maintained in the future by King County. The surface water from the Martin plat drains westerly through several lots in the recorded plat of Shamrock. During review of downstream conditions for the project, it was determined that a public drainage easement was not available for conveyance of storm water. The adjacent plat of Shamrock was recorded without the necessary drainage easements or pipe systems for conveyance of storm water from the Martin property. The applicant has contacted a property owner of a lot within the Shamrock subdivision and obtained a drainage easement for conveyance of storm water; however, it was determined that an existing house within the lot area was built within the normal 5-foot setback from the drainage easement. To resolve the site constraints for downstream pipe installation, a drainage adjustment application was reviewed by King County to determine the design requirements for installing the storm pipe. As shown in L06V0043, Attachment 3, the drainage adjustment has been approved with special designs to insure proper installation and future maintenance of the drainage pipe. Additional downstream analysis did not identify any significant drainage problems. Storm water from the Martin property is conveyed further downstream approximately 1000 feet to a large storm water pond located in the City of Renton. Also see comments in Section N.2. of this report regarding neighbor's concerns. I. TRANSPORTATION PLANS: 1. Transportation Plans: The King County Transportation Plan indicates that 1481h Avenue Southeast is designated as a collector arterial. Via the plat of Shamrock, 1481h provides the primary arterial access to the plat. The King County Non-motorized Transportation Plan indicates the closest arterial in the plan is1481h Avenue Southeast accommodating bicycles via shared roadway. 2. Subdivision Access: The Martin subdivision will provide urban road improvements with curb, gutter, and sidewalk frontage improvements along SE 125th St. The frontage road will extend westerly from the project entrance and connect to the existing road at 144th Place SE within the southwest portion of the Shamrock plat. Development of the Martin property will now complete the road connections and provide better traffic circulation within the neighborhood. An existing temporary cul-de-sac within the Shamrock plat along 144th Place SE will be removed upon completion of the new road connection to the Martin property. To provide adequate walking conditions for school children, this plat will be subject to similar walkway conditions as East Renton a'nd Rosemonte plats located north of Shamrock. Walkway improvements along 1481h Ave SE are needed to extend to the existing crosswalk on the north side of the intersection at SE 11 ?1h Street. Due to the topography and existing road improvements near the crosswalk, the applicant's design for the sidewalk shows a rockery located outside the right-of- way on private property. The applicant has contacted the property owner regarding acquisition of a road easement; however a final resolution has not been provided at this time. During final engineering, easements would need to be secured for construction on private property or an alternative walkway design which satisfies the design requirements would be needed within the existing right- of-way. It is possible that the applicant could design walkway improvements on the east side of 1481h that would meet the safe walkway requirements to the elementary. 3. Traffic Generation: It is expected that approximately 130 vehicle trips per day will be generated with full development of the proposed subdivision. This calculation includes service vehicles (i.e., mail delivery, garbage pick-up, school bus) which may currently serve this neighborhood, as well as work trips, shopping, etc. FILE NO L05P0019 Page6 J. • • 4. Adequacy of Arterial Roads: This proposal has been reviewed under the criteria in King County Code 14.70, Transportation Concurrency Management; 14.80, Intersection Standards; and King County Code 14.75; Mitigation Payment System. a. King County Code 14.70 -Transportation Concurrency Management: The Transportation Certificate of Concurrency dated October 22, 2004, indicates that transportation improvements or strategies will be in place at the time of development, or that a financial commitment is in place to complete the improvements or strategies within six (6) years, according to RCW 36. 70A.070(6). b. King County Code 14:80 -Intersection Standards: The existing arterial system requires improvements to accommodate the increased traffic volume generated by this proposal. As a result, ODES issued a MONS which calls for the mitigation needed to address the impacts resulting from added traffic onto local intersections rather than requiring an EIS prior to action on the preliminary plat application, see Section D of this report. The appeal period for the Threshold Determination closes February 20, 2007. c. King County Code 14.75 -Mitigation Payment System: King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), requires the payment of a traffic impact mitigation fee (MPS fee) and an administration fee for each single-family residential lot or unit created. MPS fees are determined by the zone in which the site is located. This site is in Zone(s) 442 per the MPS/Quartersection list. MPS fees may be paid at the time of final plat recording, or deferred until building permits are issued. The amount of the fee will be determined by the applicable fee ordinance at the time the fee is collected. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Schools: This proposal has been reviewed under RCW 58.17 .110 and King County Code 21A.28 (School Adequacy). a. School Facilities: Students from the proposed plat of Martin will be served by Apollo Elementary, Maywood Middle, and Liberty High School. As a result of the passage of time following the receipt of the response from the District, the STC has reconfirmed the school service boundaries by checking the School District's web site, and the 'service area'/Attendance map pages for each of the applicable schools. b. School Impact Fees: Currently the Issaquah School District required that an impact fee per lot be imposed to fund school system improvements to serve new development within this district. Payment of this fee in a manner consistent with K.C.C. 21 A.43 will be a condition of subdivision approval. c. School Access: Apollo Elementary School is located to the north of the subject subdivision, off of SE 11?1h Street, east of 1481h Avenue SE. According to information provided by the Issaquah School District, students of this age group would be provided bus transportation to the school due to conditions along the walkway route unless sidewalk improvements would be provided along 1481h Avenue SE (see Condition 11). The Subdivision Technical Committee (STC) has recommended that the applicant must provide safe walking conditions to Apollo Elementary as the school is only about one half mile away. Either shoulder improvements on 1481h Ave SE, from Shamrock north to SE 11 yth St. or another alternative. The existing designated crossing of 1481h Avenue SE is located immediately off-frontage from the northern subdivision boundary of Rosemonte, providing a safe walkway/crossing at this location will require special attention. Such improvements should meet th~ urban standards for sidewalks and curbs due to location on the north side of the intersection, the need for a railing, and traffic volumes on 1481h Ave SE. FILE NO L05P0019 Page 7 • • In conjunction with the plats of East Renton and Rosemonte, location and construction of a safe walking path on the east side of 1481h Ave SE is being discussed as one alternative, should the walking path connection not be completed on the west side of road. Maywood Middle School is located to the south of the proposed subdivision, on the opposite side of Southeast 1281h Street, in the 14400 block of 1681h Avenue SE. Students of this age group are provided bus transportation to/from the school due to distance and the traffic conditions along any potential walking routes. The District had requested that a safe waiting area be provided at the intersection of Southeast 1201h Street/1481h Avenue SE. The STC recommends in the plat conditions that a level concrete 'pad' be constructed to augment the required sidewalk improvements at/near the indicated intersection. See Condition 8.f. This improvement will serve the middle and high school-aged residents of the subject subdivision and the proposed plats of Rosemonte and East Renton. Liberty High School is located to the south of the proposed subdivision, on the opposite side of Southeast 1281h Street, in the 16600 block of Southeast 1361h Street. Students of this age group are provided bus transportation to/from the school due to distance and the traffic conditions along any potential walking routes. The Issaquah School District had requested, in its April 2002 response, that a safe waiting area be provided at the intersection of Southeast 1201h Street/148 1h Avenue SE. The STC recommends in the plat conditions that a level concrete 'pad' be constructed to augment the required sidewalk improvements at/near the indicated intersection. See Condition 8.h. This improvement will serve the middle and high school- aged residents of the subject subdivision and the proposed plats of Rosemonte and East Renton. 2. Parks and Recreation Space: K.C.C. 21A.14 requires subdivisions in the UR and R zone classifications to either provide on-site recreation space or pay a fee to the Parks Division for establishment and maintenance of neighborhood parks. The applicant's plan for recreation area far exceeds the requirement suitable recreation space as required by code. In total 5,070 square feet of recreational area is required (390 square feet per lot). Martin Tract A includes 10,562 s.f. of area. The recreation tract is located at the entry to the plat with two of the four sides fronting on right of way providing good visibility. All lots will be within 250 feet of the recreation tract and the tract is convenient to all lots. The recreation area is mostly level and will require minimal grading. 3. Fire Protection: The Certificate of Water Availability from Water District# 90 indicates that water will be available to the site in sufficient quantity to satisfy King County Fire Flow Standards. Prior to final recording of the plat, the water service facilities must be reviewed and approved per King County Fire Flow Standards. All future residences constructed within this subdivision are required to be sprinklered NFPA 130 unless the requirement is removed by the King County Fire Marshal or his/her designee. The Fire Code requires all portions of the exterior walls of structures to be within 150 feet (as a person would walk via an approved route around the building) from a minimum 20-foot wide, unobstructed driving surface. To qualify for removal of the sprinkler requirement driving surfaces between curbs must be a minimum of 28 feet in width when parking is allowed on one side of the roadway, and at least 36 feet in width when parking is permitted on both sides. The road width requirement applies to both on-site access and roads accessing the subdivision. FILE NO L05P0019 Page 8 • • K. UTILITIES 1. Sewage Disposal: The applicant proposes to serve the subject subdivision by public sewer of the City of Renton. The City conditioned the extension of sewer to the requirement that the developer sign a covenant allowing for future annexation of the property into the City. (See Attachment 2) 2. Water Supply: The applicant proposes to serve the subject subdivision from a public water supply and distribution system managed by Water and District# 90. A Certificate of Water Availability, dated 09/13/2005, indicates this district's capability to serve the proposed development. Dedication of easements to the district for extension of water mains will be required. L. COMPREHENSIVE AND COMMUNITY PLAN: M. 1. Comprehensive Plan: This plat is governed by the 1994 King County Comprehensive plan which designates this area as Urban Residential 4-12 dwelling units per acre. The proposed subdivision is not in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Community Plans: The subject subdivision is located in the Newcastle Planning Area and does not conflict with the goals, guidelines, and policies of the Community Plan. STATUTES/CODES: If approved with the recommended conditions in this report, the proposed development will comply with the requirements of the County and State Platting Codes and Statutes, and the lots in the proposed subdivision will comply with the minimum dimensional requirements of the zone district. N. NEIGHBOR CONCERNS: 1. A neighbor, Mr. Phung who owns property northwest of the Martin property, raised ownership issues regarding the 16 foot wide strip of land north of Martin. The strip provided the only physical access to the Phung property and Martin property prior to the plat construction of Shamrock. During the engineering review of the adjoining plat of Shamrock, Mr. Phung contended that he was the owner of the 16 foot wide access strip and submitted a series of documents to DOES he felt supports his claim of ownership. These documents along with documentation submitted by Cam West regarding ownership and easement rights were analyzed and resolved prior to the recording of Shamrock. Documentation supported the Cam West claim of ownership. Through recording of Shamrock, that portion east of 1461h Ave SE was made a separate tract as part of Shamrock, and that portion west was dedicated as right-of-way to King County. However, Mr. Phung appears to be reemphasizing his concerns about the department's decisions regarding the 16 foot strip and has again submitted documentation which has been reviewed by the ODES engineering section. The documentation presented appeared to include the same information previously submitted. After DOES review of these documents ODES found there is nothing new offered which may have altered the ODES conclusions regarding ownership. Further, the land in question is not within the property boundaries of the Martin Plat. The Martin Plat only contains access easement over this strip. Therefore, the department considers Mr. Phung's concerns moot as they relate to this plat. Also see Attachment 5 a & 5 b for illustrations. 2. The property owner east of proposed Lot 5, Mr. Safe! Basic raised concerns regarding storm drainage which was determined by the applicant's engineer to most likely caused as a result of the storm socks being full in catch basins along FILE NO L05P0019 Page 9 r I I ! • • associated with the development of Martin. Mr. Basic is also concerned that there will be future flooding that will result from runoff from the Martin Plat onto his property. As planned, storm drainage from the plat will be directed to the drainage facility on the west side of the plat and then will outlet northwest though Shamrock. Access to the Mr. Basie's lot is of issue as the existing access off 1481h crosses over the panhandle portion of Lot 5 and additionally there are significant encroachments of fencing and yard in the panhandle area, this was voiced as a concern in a November 21, 2005 email to DDES by Mr. Basic. In an October 31, 2006 letter from Cam West, they agreed to place the panhandle in a tract for future possible conveyance to Mr. Basic at the time of final plat. 3. The only other concern raised in correspondence is whether sewers can be extended to other nearby properties. This owner was directed to contact the City of Renton who provides sewer service. 0. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The subject subdivision will comply with the goals and objectives of the King County Comprehensive Plan and will comply with the requirements of the Subdivision and Zoning Codes and other official land use controls of King County, based on the conditions for final plat approval. 2. Beyond the typical plat requirements, conditions are proposed which would require the applicant to provide design plans and documentation that address the items below to the satisfaction of DDES: a. Acquisition of easements from private property owners with property adjacent to 1481h Ave SE are needed to construct road/sidewalk improvements at the intersection of 1481h Ave SE. and 11 ?1h St. Acquisition includes an easement for a retaining wall to support sidewalk improvements to the existing crosswalk on the north s[de of at SE 11 ?1h St. Walkway improvements on the west side of 1481h Ave SE along the property frontage north to the north side of SE 11 ?1h will satisfy the need for safe walkway access to the school. Given that there is no direct frontage (other than the panhandle) urban sidewalks were not deemed as needed as a result of the Martin Plat, except at the intersection of 148 1h Ave SE and SE11?1h St. Should the applicant be unable to obtain easements, it is feasible that walkway improvements could be provided on the east side of 1481h Ave SE for a safe walking path to the school. b. Plan submittals delineate a driveway encroachment in the northeasterly panhandle, along with a fence encroachment along the easterly boundary of this plat. These plat boundary discrepancies such as: (1) A boundary hiatus; (2) an overlapping boundary; or (3) a physical appurtenance, which indicates encroachment, lines of possession, or conflict of title, must be resolved to the satisfaction of the Department prior to the review submittal for the filing of the final plat. Certain resolutions may have a negative impact on plat density calculations, although this possibility is considered as remote. P. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the subject subdivision preliminary plat, revised and received April 21, 2006, be granted preliminary approval, subject to the following revisions to the plat design and conditions of final approval: 1. Compliance with all platting provisions of Title 19A of the King County Code. FILE NO L05P0019 Page 10 • • 2. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final plat a dedication that includes the language set forth in King County Council Motion No. 5952. 3. The plat shall comply with the base density and minimum density requirements of the R-4 zone classification. All lots shall meet the minimum dimensional requirements of the R-4 zone classification or shall be shown on the face of the approved preliminary plat, whichever is larger, except that minor revisions to the plat which do not result in substantial changes may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environment Services. All plat boundary discrepancy shall be resolved to the satisfaction of DOES prior to the submittal of the final plat documents. As used in this condition, "discrepancy" is a boundary hiatus, an overlapping boundary or a physical appurtenance which indicates an encroachment, lines of possession or a conflict of title. 4. The applicant must obtain final approval from the King County Health Department. 5. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the King County Road Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No. 11187, as amended (1993 KCRS). 6. The applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main, and fire flow standards of Chapter 17 .08 of the King County Code. All future residences constructed within this subdivision are required to be sprinklered NFPA 13D unless the requirement is removed by the King County Fire Marshal or his/her designee. The Fire Code requires all portions of the exterior walls of structures to be within 150 feet (as a person would walk via an approved route around the building) from a minimum 20- foot wide, unobstructed driving surface. To qualify for removal of the sprinkler requirement driving surfaces between curbs must be a minimum of 28 feet in width when parking is allowed on one side of the roadway, and at least 36 feet in width when parking is permitted on both sides. The road width requirement applies to both on-site access and roads accessing the subdivision. Storm Drainage 7. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval, which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. a. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual. DOES approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. b. Standard plan notes and a construction sequence as specified in the King County drainage manual shall be shown on the engineering plans (Reference Section 7B). c. A storm water pollution prevention and spill (SWPPS) plan shall be included with the project engineering plans as required in Chapter 2 of the drainage manual. FILE NO L05P0019 Page 11 • • d. Storm water facilities shall be designed using the KCRTS conservation flow control standard. Water quality facilities shall also be provided using the basic water quality protection menu. If the proposed onsite storm water pond is used as a wet pond for water quality treatment, the facility shall be revised as necessary to comply with requirements for a 3:1 flow path for water quality treatment as outlined in the drainage manual. e. To implement the required Best Management Practices (BMP's) for treatment of storm water, the final engineering plans and technical information report (TIR) shall clearly demonstrate compliance with all applicable design standards. The requirements for best management practices are outlined in Chapter 5 of the drainage manual. The design engineer shall address the applicable requirements on the final engineering plans and provide all necessary documents for implementation. The final recorded plat shall include all required covenants, easements, notes, and other details to implement the required BMP's for site development. f. All runoff control facilities shall be located in a separate tract and dedicated to King County unless portions of the drainage tract are used for recreation space in accordance with KCC 21A.14.180. g. During preliminary review, the applicant received approval for a drainage adjustment (L06V0043) regarding the building setbacks for constructing an offsite drainage pipe within the adjacent plat of Shamrock. The final engineering plans shall show the design requirements for constructing the offsite pipe and demonstrate compliance with all conditions of approval as listed in the drainage adjustment decision. To assure adequate capacity is provided for conveyance of storm water from the onsite detention pond, the overflow system and conveyance pipe shall be designed at a minimum for the 1 OOyear storm based upon developed site conditions. h. As depicted by field topography on the site plans, an upstream drainage basin is located east of the subject property. The final engineering plans shall be designed to address any requirements for bypass of upstream drainage as described on page 1-42 in the drainage manual. Due to groundwater conditions on the site, the design engineer shall also evaluate the need for interceptor trenches and easements for conveyance of drainage. As shown in applicants drainage report site map, an existing trench drain is located in the eastern portion of the site which should be removed or relocated. Based upon the final designs, drainage easements may be required to convey surface or ground water through the project. i. As shown on the applicant's preliminary site plans, the existing storm system located near the west property line shall be removed during site construction. The existing pipes and catch basins shall be shown on the final engineering plans with applicable notes and/or design requirements for removal. Access/Roads 8. The proposed subdivision shall comply with the 1993 King County Road Standards (KCRS) including the following requirements: a. Road A shall be improved as an urban minor access street. b. The frontage road (SE 125th St) along Tract A shall be improved full width as an urban subaccess street and shall extend westerly from the project entrance at 145th Ave SE to 144th Place within the Shamrock plat. Sixteen feet of additional right-of-way shall be dedicated for completion of the road improvements. A temporary cul-de-sac located on lots 38 and 39 FILE NO L05P0019 Page 12 • • within the Shamrock plat shall be removed upon completing the road connection. Design standards for removing a temporary cul-de-sac are provided in KCRS 2.080. c. As shown on the preliminary plat map, an existing easement for ingress and egress is located along the north boundary of the plat and extends easterly to 148 1h Ave SE. Any rights of vehicular access granted to the Martin property by this easement or other easements shall be extinguished, prior to or concurrent with final plat recording. d. Street trees shall be included in the design of all road improvements, and shall comply with Section 5.03 of the KCRS. e. Modifications to the road standards shown above may be considered by King County pursuant to the variance procedures in KCRS 1.08. f. 1481h Ave SE is classified an arterial street which may require designs for bus zones and turn outs. As specified in KCRS 2.16, the designer shall contact Metro and the local school district to determine specific requirements. 9. There shall be no direct vehicular access to or from 1481h Ave SE from that lot or tract which abut it, unless such a tract is transferred to the abutting property. A note to this effect shall appear on the engineering plans and the final plat. 10. Off-site access to the subdivision shall be over a full-width, dedicated and improved road which has been accepted by King County for maintenance. If the proposed access road has not been accepted by King County at the time of recording, then said road shall be fully bonded by the applicant of this subdivision. 11. The applicant shall provide a safe walking access to Apollo Elementary School with walkway improvements along the west side of 1481h Ave NE from the north line of Shamrock to the existing crosswalk on the north side of SE 11 ]1h St. This improvement includes urban improvements at the crosswalk on the north side of SE 1171h St. It is noted that the adjoining plat of East Renton will be subject to urban frontage requirements and extension of safe walkway improvements to the existing crosswalk on the north side of SE11?1hST. The safe walkway noted above or other alternative shall be designed to the satisfaction of the school district and DOES. Mitigation/Impact Fees 12. The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by the applicable fee ordinance. The applicant has the option to either: (1) pay the MPS fee at the final plat recording, or (2) pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the plat that reads, "All fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), have been paid." If the second option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of building permit application. 13. Lots within this subdivision are subject to King County Code 21A.43, which imposes impact fees to fund school system improvements needed to serve new development. As a condition of final approval, fifty percent (50%) of the impact fees due for the plat shall be assessed and collected immediately prior to the recording, using the fee schedules in effect when FILE NO L05P0019 Page 13 • • the plat receives final approval. The balance of the assessed fee shall be allocated evenly to the dwelling units in the plat and shall be collected prior to building permit issuance. Recreational Area 14. The plat shall provide suitable recreation space consistent with the requirements of K.C.C. 21A.14.180 and K.C.C. 21A. 14.190 (i.e., children's play equipment, sport court[s], picnic table[s], benches, etc.). Other a. A detailed recreation space plan (i.e., location, area calculations, dimensions, landscape specs, equipment specs, etc.) shall be submitted for review and approval by ODES prior to or concurrent with the submittal of engineering plats. b. A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording of the plat. 15. A homeowners' association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction of ODES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the recreation, open space and/or sensitive area tract(s). 16. To implement K.C.C. 16.82 which applies to the site, a detailed tree retention plan shall be submitted with the engineering plans for the subject plat. The tree retention plan (and engineering plans) shall be consistent with the requirements of K.C.C. 16.82, as well as the conceptual tree retention plan (dated April 21, 2006). No clearing of the subject property is permitted until the final tree retention plan is approved by LUSD. Flagging and temporary fencing of trees to be retained shall be provided, consistent with K.C.C. 16.82 The placement of impervious surfaces, fill material, excavation work, or the storage of construction materials is prohibited within the fenced areas around preserved trees, except for grading work permitted pursuant to K.C.C. 16.82. 17. Street trees shall be provided as follows (per KCRS 5.03 and K.C.C. 21A.16.050): a. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. b. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. c. If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. d. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the county has adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. e. The species of trees shall be approved by ODES if located within the right-of-way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to FILE NO L05P0019 Page 14 SEPA • • obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. f. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by ODES prior to engineering plan approval. g. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DOES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. h. A landscape inspection fee shall also be submitted prior to plat recording. The inspection fee is subject to change based on the current county fees. 18. The following have been established by SEPA as necessary requirements to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of this development. The applicants shall demonstrate compliance with these items prior to final approval. 1.) To mitigate the significant adverse impact the plat of Martin will have on the intersections of SR 9001148th Ave SE and SR 9001164th Ave SE, the applicant shall install, either individually or in conjunction with other development projects in this area, the following improvements at the SR 9001148th Ave intersection: • A traffic signal, and • Eastbound and westbound left turn lanes The design for the SR 9001148th Ave intersection improvements shall be approved by the Washington State Department of Transportation (and by King County to the extent such improvements are located in County right-of- way). In addition, at a minimum, the existing entering sight distance looking east for the north and south legs of the intersection (602 feet and 386 feet, respectively) shall not be reduced as part of the intersection improvements. Documentation shall be submitted to show this requirement is met. All construction work associated with the intersection improvements shall be completed between April 1st and September 30th. This seasonal restriction shall be clearly shown on the final engineering plans. In lieu of the installation of the above-noted intersection improvements prior to final plat approval, the applicant may post a financial guarantee with WSDOT which assures the installation of these improvements within two years of the recording of Martin. In this event, intersection improvement design must be approved by WSDOT prior to King County approval of the engineering plans for Martin. If the above-noted intersection improvements have already been made by others prior to the recording of Martin, or a financial guarantee has been posted by others which assures the installation of these improvements, then the applicant for Martin shall pay a pro-rata share dollar amount to the developer who has made the improvements or "bonded" for the improvements, in an amount proportional to the impacts of Martin. The pro- rata share dollar amount to be paid shall be set by WSDOT, and documentation shall be provided by the Martin applicant to the King County Land Use Services Division to show this payment has been made, prior to final plat recording. The pro-rata dollar amount to be paid shall be based on the following: • The final Martin lot count . FILE NO L05P0019 Page 15 • • • The trip distribution for Martin • The total trips contributed to the intersection of SR 900.148th Ave by the plats of Aster Park (LOOP0024), Stone Ridge (L99P3008), East Renton (L02P0005), Shamrock (L02P0014), Rosemonte (aka Ironwood - L03P0018), Martin (L05P0019) and any future land use applications submitted to King County for which compliance with the King County Intersection Standards (KCC 14.80) is required at either the SR 9001148th Ave intersection, or the SR 9001164th Ave High Accident Location. In the event that either King County or WSDOT adopts a formal "latecomer's" system prior to final plat recording, that system may be followed in lieu of the approach described above, at the discretion of the applicant, as long as at a minimum there is a financial guarantee which assures the above-noted intersection improvements will be installed within two years of the date of recording of the plat of Martin. [Comprehensive Plan Policy T-303 and King County Code 21A.28.060A] 2.) Documentation shall be provided to demonstrate to the satisfaction of WSDOT that stopping sight distance (360 feet) is available on the east leg of the SR 9001148th Ave intersection. The intersection shall be modified by the applicant, if necessary, so that this stopping sight distance requirement is met on the east leg. In addition, the applicant shall clear vegetation within the right-of-way along SR 900, east of 143th Ave., to maximize the entering sight distance for the north and south legs of the intersection. [Comprehensive Plan Policy T-303 and King County Comprehensive Policy T-303 and King County Code 21A.28.060A] Q. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: 1. The subdivision shall conform to K.C.C. 16.82 relating to grading on private property. 2. Development of the subject property may require registration with the Washington State Department of Licensing, Real Estate Division. 3. Preliminary approval of this application does not limit the applicant's responsibility to obtain any required permit or license from the State or other regulatory body. This may include, but is not limited to the following: a. Forest Practice Permit from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources. b. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit fromWSDOE. c. Water Quality Modification Permit from WSDOE. d. Water Quality Certification (401) Permit from U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. R. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Plat Map 2. Renton Sewer Availability letter 3. Surface Water Management Variance/L06V0043 4. Density Calculation Worksheet 5. ROW/Easement Exhibit FILE NO L05P0019 Page 16 • • s. TRANSMITTED TO PARTIES LISTED HEREAFTER: BASIC, SAFET 12601 -148TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 CLAUSSEN, KIM PPM Ill MS: OAK -DE-0100 LUSD/DDES DELANGE JOEL 12438 148TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 DINSMORE, LISA SUPERVISOR MS: OAK -DE-0100 CPLN/LUSD DYE, PETE SR. ENGINEER MS: OAK -DE-0100 ERS/LUSD GILBERT KEITH & CATHY 12609 -148TH AVE. SE RENTON, WA 98059 GILLEN, NICK ENV. SCIENTIST MS: OAK-DE-0100 CAS/LUSD GOLL SHIRLEY ASII MS: OAK -DE-0100 LUSD/DDES HEARING EXAMINER ATTN: MARKA/GINGER MS: YES-CC-0404 LANGLEY, KRIS TRAFFIC ENGINEER MS: OAK -DE-0100 CPLN/LUSD PHUNG.ANDY 9333 57TH AVE WEST MUKILTEO WA 98275 SCHARER, KAREN PPM II MS: OAK -DE-0100 LUSD/DDES SEATTLE KC HEALTH DEPT. E. ENV HEALTH 14350 SE EASTGATE WAY BELLEVUE WA 98007 SLATTEN SARA CAM WEST DEVELOPMENT 9720 NE 120TH PL #100 KIRKLAND WA 98034 TOWNSEND STEVE SUPERVISOR LUIS/DOES MS OAK DE 0100 TRIAD ASSOCIATES 12112 115TH AVE NE KIRKLAND WA 98034 WEST, LARRY ENV. SCIENTIST MS: OAK -DE-0100 CAS/DDES WHITING KELLY KC DOT RD SERV DIV MS KSC TR 0231 ANDERSON, ROBERT L., PO BOX 353 MAPLE VALLEY, WA 98038 CHILDS, R. KRISTINE & KEITH, 12004-148TH AVE. SE RENTON, WA 98059 CORE DESIGN INC., 14711 NE 29TH PL, #101 BELLEVUE, WA 98007 CRULL, RICK & DEBRA, 11813 148TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 DALRY, MIKE, 11524 -148TH AVE. SE RENTON, WA 98059 DONNELLY, CLAUDIA, 10415147TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 EGGERT, URSULA, 15520 SE 116TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059-6014 GRAVES, JOHN LOZIER HOMES CORPORATION 1203 -114TH AVE. SE BELLEVUE, WA 98004 LIND, REBECCA CITY OF RENTON EDNSP DEPT. 1055 S. GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98058 ZIMMERMAN, GREGG CITY OF RENTON PLANNING 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98055 FILE NO L05P0019 Page 17 • • Ccasp..-• .,., 2/B/2007 II: 22 All, [: \PRo.£CTS\0<257\dwg (JH\nnal\0<257b•l.d•9, 11,'7 SIi• Plan 5JIOq 5Jl0qsn 011598S I 01159 TOI 01159FCI 01159£CI 0 <25lcCI 0<257PRI 0<257FCI 0<257701 0<25lcSV 0<257TSV. ,,. ......... $[,//(Mortin aerial.pg ,nomrack.111 FN,OOJO.tif Fil,OOJO.tlf '-f-_,/''\/ JL ! -==i,t=_ .===!;;==:-..--t~~ --+----<--+-+- _ _,---, I I ·1 l L __ _J ----------1 I I 1 I I I L __ _J -----, --~ I I I ,_ __ ..J ----1 r I ___ _J .. ______ -- r-, J L-, I I I I ___ _J .... -~ ... ----1 ......_1 I ....... _ _---s:...:.,_ __ ---,....,,,.,.,..,_, -- -----, LI I () --~ I "' L __ J 8 -.J I I I I I r-------1 I 1 1 I I f _______ J , _________ .._ ----- i ----'----+----,i --- > ;;I V, I I 11n,, lffll1Dlfl JI r-JI 1, 0 I, .. ;4 I lit ... I\) § ~ ~ L_ Mm IOT Cl 0 (J) !!l (') ~ s rr:i .... • II 0) q , I ~ , I I ,' ,I I I I , I / / I / 1/i.,. . ) ~fr,.L 1 .. --::. ----- SITE PLAN CAMWEST DEVELOPMENT MARTIN PROPERTY KING COUN TY. WASHINGTON (/) m .... ']. (/) m ' .• (/) m C, .... 0 z 1111n 'f ul r ~ l I ~ . - ·~· . ·· .. · ' -..u. -· ·. ' Kathy· KCo!ker-~heeler, MayOr. September 26, 2005 Sara Slatten Cam West Development 9712 N.E. 12o•h Place, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 .CIT.-::>F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zinimerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: SANITARY SEWER AVAILABILITY -12439 148T 11 A VE. S.E. KCPID NO 102305-9383 13-LOT MARTIN PLAT Dear Ms. Slatten: This letter shall serve as a supplement to the sewer availability prepared for this proposed development dated September 26, 2005. Sanitary sewer service from the City is available to serve this proposed development Sewer is directly available to this proposed plat. The development will be responsible to provide all sewer extensions to adjacent rights-of-way and within the actual development Initial review indicates that this development will serve into the City's existing system in the plat of Shamrock. This sewer availability is also conditioned upon the requirement that a covenant to annex document be executed prior to th_e recording cifthe proposed plat. This document will be forwarded to you prior to the recording of the plat. Fees for this plat will include System Development Charges of $900.00 per lot, Special Assessment District charges for the East Renton System, $60 per lot side sewer permit fees, right- of-way fee and bond to be determined upon submittal, inspection and plan review fee of 5% of estimated construction cost, and a King County permit fee equal to I 00% of costs billed by the County to the City. Please note that fees are subject to change without notice. any questions r garding this availability, please contact me at 425-430-7212. LOSfo01q A1TAGf1Nt,Jr Z - I IYile Sys\WWP -WasteWatcr\WWl'-01-0000 Corre,pondencc -Wastcwa1et1<111vrc1Snw us-oil_ Milo in) ettc~N T Q N · I 055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 1\... C AHEAD nF TH F. CTJRV11 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenu.e SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 July 27, 2006 Sara Slatten Cam West 9720 NE 120th Place, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 Rebecca Cushman, P.E. Triad Associates · 12112-1151h Avenue NE Kirkland, WA 98034 RE: Shamrock Heights Subdivision 1998 KCSWDM Adjustment Request (File No. L06V0043) Dear Applicant and Engineer: The Land Use Services Division, Engineering Review Section, has completed review of the adjustment request for the Shamrock Heights subdivision. You are requesting approval for an adjustment from the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) Section 4.1, Route Design and Easement Requirements. Our review of the information and a site visit provides the following findings: 1. The proposed Shamrock Heights subdivision is located in the 12600th block of 144th Place SE. The completed and constructed Shamrock Heights subdivision is filed under Land Use Services Division (LUSD) file number L02P0014. 2. The Shamrock Heights subdivision recorded a IO foot utility easement along the south property line of Lot #35 for the purpose of constructing a drainage conveyance pipe at the natural discharge location to benefit the proposed preliminary plat of the Martin Property, LUSD file number.L05P0019. Releases from the Martin Plat's stormwater facility would enter a drainage pipe that would pass from east to west through Lot #35 and connect to a catch basin in the 144th Place SE right-of-way. These detained releases would be tributary to the Shamrock Heights drainage facility which is in the City of Renton. 3. The 10 foot utility easement, which requires no building setback line (BSBL), should have been labeled a drainage easement which would have required a 5 foot BSBL. The foundation of the home on Lot #35 was poured directly against the edge of the 10 foot utility easement (with no BSBL) before the error was discovered. 4. The intent of a BSBL from a drainage easement is to guarantee that a 1: 1 vertical to horizontal influence line from the base of a building's foundation does not bear on the drainage pipe. For instance, if a pipe were centered in a IO foot easement, the _ __,,.. -----· ~--~~::ghts&oo43 • July 27, 2006 Page2 of2 foundation was placed against the easement and the bottom of the foundation footing was 3 feet deep, then the influence line would meet the center of the easenient at a depth of 8 feet. ' 5. The applicant has provided a cross sectional view of the as-built location of Lot #35's foundation in relation to the property line and the foundation's line of influence. Based on the invert elevation of where the drainage pipe must connect to the catch .. basin in the 144th Place SE right-of-way (the pipe's downstream end) and the fact that the pipe must be laid at positive grade, the applicant has shown that the pipe, when installed, will remain above the influence line of the foundation and therefore satisfy the intent of the BSBL requirement. Based on these findings, we hereby approve this adjustment to allow the elimination of the· BSBL from the drainage easement given that the intent of the requirement will be satisfied when the drainage pipe is installed, with the following conditions: I. The drainage pipe must be installed in the center of the 10 foot drainage easement. 2. In the portion of the corridor next to the foundation, the drainage pijle must be laid no deeper than 5 feet plus the depth of the existing foundation footing. 3. The easement corridor must remain unobstructed. 4. Notification to, and written acknowledgement from the City of Renton that the stormwater facility of the Martin Plat will be connected to the drainage system tributary to a facility in the City's jurisdiction. If you have any further questions regarding this KCSWDM adjustment or the design requirements, please contact Mark Bergam at (206) 296-7270. James Sanders, P.E. Development Engineer Engineering Review Section Land Use Services Division t?f-c?-- Jim Chan, P.E. Supervising Engineer Site Engineering and Planning Section Building Services Division ' cc: Curt Crawford, P.E., Managing Engineer, Stormwater Services Section, KCDNR Steve Van Patten, Engineer II, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Mark Bergam, P.E., Engineer III? Engineering Review Section, LUSD • () ® King County Deparbnent of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division Alternative formats available upon request 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6800 TTY 206-298-7217 . loSPOO/CJ FIie Number (To be filled in by ODES) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION WORKSHEET RELATING TO DENSITY AND DIMENSIONS Several development regulations play a role in the creation of a subdivision wijhin King County. Determining the allowable density, minimum density, and a lot width on a piece of property can be confusing. This worksheet will assist you in correctly applying specific portions of the code and will be used to determine if a proposed subdivision or short subdivision meets the density and dimensions provisions of the King County Zoning Code (TIiie 21A). This worksheet is designed to assist applicants and does not replace compliance with adopted local, state and federal laws. Pre-application conferences are required prior to submittal of a subdivision or short subdivision. These conferences help to clarify issues and answer questions. They may save you both time and money by eliminating delays resulting from requests for additional information and revisions. You may call 206-296-6600 to find out how to arrange for a pre-application conference. Worksheet Prepared By: SM-A S; t.A-TIFN Date: 9 -2 7 -OS (Print Name) Subdivision Name: MA1?-T1N P\2-PPl?l?-1)/ · Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: l Jg.AA}:J M f:..D\ I ltY\ i2.0 ' Zoning: -"'-=-:::::i:-1------------------------ If more than one Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation or zone classification exists for the property, show the boundary between the land uses or zones and the area within each on the preliminary plat map. If a single lot is divided by a zone boundary, transferring densfy across zones on that lot may be permitted subject to the provisions ofK.C.C. 21A.12.200. Please complete only the applicable portions of this form I. Site Area (K.C.C. 21A.06.11721 also see (K.C.C. 21A.12.080): Site area (in square feet) is the gross horizontal area of the project site, less submerged lands as defined by K.C.C. 21A.06.1265, and less areas which are required to be dedicated on the perimeter of a project site for the public rights-of-way. -~o~--square feet in submerged land (any land below the ordinary high water mark -see K.C.C. 21A.06.825) __ -0-~--square feet in perimeter rights-of-way which will be required to be + ~:fr...__Total dedicated m]@@@ Q 'v/J@ D 4 ~I SEP 2 8 2n1J<; @ Ai\) Gfl .Me~tthe DDEST~!v.mt!!:Jdes Kc. ·D.D.E.S 1,1\ Subd,O•on Den•~ aad o,m'"''°" Colculalloos l~::,:g,; 12110/03 MAIN flb.£1 Ci)()PV • \( = • Calculation: n • LJ 1 lal 1704 Gross horizontal area of the project site __ :fr:=---Total submerged lands and rights-of-way 11,e,1,1s+ 3.71 Site area in square feet NOTE: To continue calculations, convert site area in square feet to acres by dividing by 43,560 Site area in acres NOTE: When calculating the site area for parcels in the RA Zone, if the site area should result in a fraction of an acre, the following shall apply: Fractions of .50 or above shall be rounded up to the next whole number and fractions below .50 shall be rounded down. Example: If the stte area in acres is 19.5 acres (less the submerged land and less the area that is required to be dedicated on the perimeter of a project site for public right-of-way) the site area can be rounded up to 20 acres. No further rounding is allowed. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.080) II. Base Density IK.C.C. 21A.12.030 -.040 tables): The base density is determined by the zone designations(s) for the lot. 4 du/acre Ill. Allowable Dwelling Units and Rounding IK.C.C. 21A.12.070l: The base number of dwelling units is calculated by multiplying the site area by the base density in dwelling unils per acre (from K.C.C. 21A.12.030 -.040 tables) . .3.11 site area in acres (see Section 1.) X 4 base density (see Section II) = 14.'i!,l., allowable dwelling units Except as noted below, when calculations result in a fraction, the fraction is rounded to the nearest whole number as follows: A. Fractions of .50 or above shall be rounded up; and B. Fractions below .50 shali be rounded down. NOTE: For parcels in the RA Zone, no rounding is allowed when calculating the allowable number of dwelling units. For example, if the calculation of the number of dwelling units equaled 2.75, the result would be 2 dwelling units. Rounding up to 3 is not allowed. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.070(E)). IV. Required On-site Recreation Space (K.C.C. 21A.14.180l: This section must be completed only if the proposal is a residential development if more than four dwelling units in the UR and R zones, stand-alone townhouses in the NB zone on property designated Commercial Outside of Center if more than four units, or any JP~• ... .al mixe~i. d•p2f more than ~n~ Recreation space must be computed by ftl \fllC,PI ""tA'I I Che7t:lut the ·S~~slte www.metrokc.gov/ddes Subdivision Density and Dimension Calculations lc-cal-subden.pdf 12/10/03 Page 2 of6 • (J • multiplying the recreation space requirement per untt type by the proposed number of such dwelling units (K.C.C. 21A.14.180). Note: King County has the discretion to accept a fee in lieu of all or a portion of the required recreation space per K.C.C. 21A.14.185. Apartments and town houses developed at a density greater than eight units per acre, and mixed use must provide recreational space as follows: 90 square feet X ___ proposed number of studio and one bedroom units 170 square feet X proposed number of two bedroom units + 170 square feet X === proposed number of three or more bedroom units + Recreation space requirement Residential subdivisions, townhouses and apartments developed at a density of eight units or less per acre must provide recreational space as follows: 390 square feet X ---1...:,..___ proposed number of units = 9:)70 SF Mobile home parks shall provide recreational space as follows: 260 square feet X ___ proposed number of units V. Net Buildable Area (K.C.C. 21A.06.7971: This section is used for computing minimum density and must be completed only if the site is located in the R-4 through R-48 zones and designated Urban by the King County Comprehensive Plan. The net buildable area is the site area (see Section I) less the following areas: ::0:::: areas within a project site which are required to be dedicated for public rights-of-way in · excess of sixty (60') of width · + 10,434 sensitive areas and their buffers, to the extent they.are required by King County to remain undeveloped + 23 1'2:% areas required for above ground stonnwater control facilities lndudlng, but not limited to, retention/detention ponds, biofiltration swales and setbacks from such ponds and swales -9: areas required by King County to be dedicated or rese,ved as on-site recreation areas. + + + Deduct area within storrnwater control facility if requesting recreation space credit as allowed by K.C.C. 21A.14.180 (see Section IV) _fr-"'---regional utility corridors, and __ fr,._,_ __ other areas. excluding setbacks, required by King County to remain undeveloped 331~'£2. Total reductions Calculation: l<al,7S# site area in square feet (see Section1) 33, /£2.Total reductions · 12 e, 102. Net buildable area in square feet NOTE: convert site area is square feet to t acres by dividing by 43,560 = 2,94 Net buildable area In acres Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Subdivision Denslty end Dimension Celculet!ons 12/10103 Pege3of6 + + + + + + + = = •,.'\ ' l VI. Minimum Urban Residential Density (K.C.C. 21A.12.060): The minimum density requirement applies only to the R-4 through R-48 zones. Minimum density is determined by multiplying the base density in dwelling units per .acre (see Section II) by the net buildable area of the site in acres (see Section V) and then multiplying the resulting product by the minimum density percentage from the K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table. The minimum density requiremen.ts may be phased or waived by King County in certain cases. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.060.) Also, the minimum density requirement does not apply to properties zoned R-4 located within the rural town of Fall City. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.030(8)12.) Calculation: __ 4..__ base density In du/ac (see Section II) X · 2 ,qL.l. Net buildable area in acres (see Section V) -~-~~ X minimum density% set forth in K.C.C. 21A.12J!o or as adjusted In Section VII 11,1 '2 minimum dWelling units required VII. Minimum Density Adjustments for Moderate Slopes (K.C.C. 21A.12.087l: Residential developments .in the R-4, R-6 and R-8 zones may modify the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 based on the weighted average slope of the net buildable area of the site (see Section V). To determine the weighted average slope, a topographic survey is required to calculate the net buildable area(s) within each of the following slope increments and then multiplying the number of square feet in each slope increment by the median slope value of each slope increment as follows: ____ sq. ft 0·5% slope increment X 2.5% median slope value= ____ sq. ft 5-10% slope increment X 7 .5% median slope value = + ____ sq. ft 10-15% slope increment X 12.5% median slope value= _____ + ____ sq. ft 15-20% slope increment X 17.5% median slope value= + ____ sq. ft 20-25% slope increment X 22.5% median slope value= + ____ sq. fl 25-30% slope increment X 27 .5% median slope value = + ____ sq. ft 30-35% slope increment X 32.5% median slope value= + sq. ft 35-40% slope incrementX 37.5% median slope value= + Total square feet Total square feet In net buildable area adjusted for slope Calculation: ____ total square feet adjusted for slope divided by total square feet in net buildable area weighted average slope of net bulldable area ----% (Note: multiply by 100 to convert to percent -round up to nearest whole percent) Use the table below to determine the minimum density factor. This density is substituted for the minimum density factor in K.C.C: 21A.12.030 table when calculating the minimum density as shown in Section VI of this worksheet. · Weighted Average Slope of Net Minimum Density Factor Buildable Arearsl of Site: 0% --less than 5% 85% 5% --less than 15% 83%, less 1.5% each 1 % of averaae slooe in excess of 5% 15% -less than 40% 66%, less 2.0% for each 1 % of averane slone in excess of 15% ~eNr" + 'r. .~ t · Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Subdivision Density and Dimension Calculations lc-cal-subden.pdf 12/10/03 Page 4 of6 r l ~ ~ --------------------------- &G'l9l -------------------~------~- ---------~=t., g R ) ; I----'-__; ~ ""--;;,;i,r----3.loil----'"== 1 I ' ' ·~~o. . , I . 'r,; ' oO' \11 r /: a: w 0. 0 °' 0. " z ::, :,: 0. ••REA A 33 34 35 36 44 43 42 41 40 , AREA B w a, ... 14 ,,. :z: .. CD 16 .. 15 ~ / 32 31 30 ' I SE 125TH ST AREA A: 797 SQ. FT. AREA 8: 2,596 SQ. FT. AREA C: 7,504 SQ. FT. w "' ... ,,. :z: .. ... 18 19 20 .. 17 ~ I SE 124TH Pl ~ 29 28 27 26 V, .... u "' ~ ARFA C I ....... -7N'\~ SCALE: 1" = 100' /_T1JAP, --12112 116th Ave. NE Kirkland, WA 98034-6923 426.821.8448 22 www.trladassoc.com ~ e • 23 .. .... ii; -al w ~ .. ~ ~ !I! I-24· < Ui C/) TRACT D :z: .... ,-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 25 ~ C/) ~ ~ ~ (.) ,.: C) ~ a: u .. ii; "' • -GERRY BUCK -00,D, SEB -NAY t).IJl!, 9/IJ/05 ~ a, scu.r, BlJlllZ., , rxr "' l'JI]'.: 5 JllBli1JIIBll 01-159 SIIB!TNlll!BIB "' ~ 1 011 <::. a, ANDERSON ROBERT L P.O. BOX 353 MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 llASIC, SAFET 12601 -148TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 98059 CHILDS KRISTINE & KEITH 12004 148TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 CLAUSSEN. KIM PROGRAM MANAGER Ill MS: OAK -DE-0100 ODES/ LUSD CORE DESIGN INC. 14711 NE 29TII PL# JOI BELLEVUE WA 98007 CRULL RICK & DEBRA 11813 148TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 DALRY MIKE 11524 148TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 DELANGE JOEL 12438 148TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 DINSMORE, LISA CURRENT PLANNING SUPERVISOR MS: OAK -DE-0 I 00 DOES / LUSD • L05POOl9 L05P0019 L05POOl9 L05POOl9 L05PD0!9 L05P0Dl9 L05POOl9 LD5POOl9 L05POOJ9 • DONNELLY CLAUDIA 10415 147TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 DYE, PETE SR. ENGINEER DDES/LUSD MS: OAK -DE-0100 EGGERT URSULA 15520 SE 116TH ST RENTON WA 98059 GILBERT KEITH & CATHY 12609 -148TH A VE. SE RENTON, WA 98059 98059 GILLEN, NICK CRITICAL AREA WETLAND REVIEW MS: OAK -DE-0100 DDES / LUSD GOLL SHIRLEY ASII CURRENT PLANNING SECTION MS: OAK -DE-0100 DDES I LUSD GRAVES JOHN LOZIER HOMES CORP 1203 114TH A VE SE BELLEVUE WA 98004 KC HEALTH DEPT EAST DISTRICT 14350 SE EASTGATE WAY BELLEVUE WA 98007 KC HEARING EXAMINER'S OFFICE ATI'N: GINGER/MARKA MS: YES-CC-0404 L05POOJ9 L05POOJ9 L05POOJ9 L05POOJ9 L05P0019 L05PD019 L05P0Dl9 L05POOJ9 L05P0Dl9 LANGLEY, KRIS rRAFFIC ENGINEER MS: OAK -DE-0100 DOES/ LUSD LIND REBECCA CITY OF RENTON EDNSP DEPT 1055 S GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98058 PHUNG ANT. 9333 57TH A VE WEST MUKILTEO WA 98275 SCHARER, KAREN PROJECT MANAGER II MS: OAK -DE-0100 DOES/ LUSD SLATTEN SARA CAM WEST DEVELOPMENT 9720 NE 120TH PL.# 100 KIRKLAND WA 98034 J'OWNSEND STEVE SUPERVISOR LUIS/DOES MS OAK DE 0100 fRIAD ASSOCIATES 12112 115TH AVE NE Kl RKLAND WA 98034 WEST, LARRY CRITICAL AREA GEO REVIEW MS: OAK -DE-0 I 00 DDES/LUSD WHITING KELLY KC DOT RD SERV DIV MS KSC TR 0231 • L05P0019 L05P00!9 L05POOl9 L05P0019 L05P0019 L05POOl9 L05POOl9 L05POOl9 L05P0019 • ZIMMERMAN GREGG CITY OF RENTON PLANNING 1055SGRADYWAY RENTON WA 98055 L05POOl9 • • TO: FAX NO.: PHONE NO.: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 Fax No. 206-296-6613 or 206-296-7051 FAX COVER SHEET Ginger/ Marka 206-296-1654 206-296-4660 Total numbers of pages including this cover sheet: 4 Date: 1/26/2007 From: Shirley Goll Sender's Name Time: 0 l', 51.t \\. .'tl\. Phone: 206-296-6796 Sender's Phone Permit Name/Number: L05P0019 -Martin Parties of Record list. applicant name & address. property location. COMMENTS: Hearing date is set for March 22. 2007. SEPA appeal period will end on February 20. 2007. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NUMBER -# 2007-0082 MAIN FILS C. PY ExaminerFaxCover.doc (}'\ ____ __.,,. • • TRANSMITTED TO THE FOLLOWING PARTIES OF RECORD FOR L05P0019 BASIC, SAFET 12601 -148TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 CLAUSSEN, KIM PPM III MS: OAK-DE-0100 LUSD/DDES DELANGE JOEL 12438 148TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 DINSMORE, LISA SUPERVISOR MS: OAK-DE-0100 CPLN/LUSD DYE, PETE SR. ENGINEER MS: OAK -DE-0100 ERS/LUSD GILBERT KEITH & CATHY 12609 c 148TH AVE. SE RENTON, WA 98059 GILLEN, NICK ENV. SCIENTIST MS: OAK -DE-0100 CAS/LUSD GOLL SHIRLEY ASII MS: OAK-DE-0100 LUSD/DDES HEARING EXAMINER ATTN: MARKA/GINGER MS: YES-CC-0404 LANGLEY, KRIS TRAFFIC ENGINEER MS: OAK-DE-0100 CPLN/LUSD PHUNG ANT. 9333 57TH A VE WEST MUKILTEO WA 98275 SCHARER, KAREN PPM II MS: OAK -DE-0100 LUSD/DDES SEATTLE KC HEAL TH DEPT. E. ENV HEAL TH 14350 SE EASTGATE WAY BELLEVUE WA 98007 SLATTEN SARA CAM WEST DEVELOPMENT 9720 NE 120TH PL # I 00 KIRKLAND WA 98034 TOWNSEND STEVE SUPERVISOR . LUIS/DDES MS OAK DE 0100 ... • TRIAD AS SOCIA TES 12112 115TH AVE NE KIRKLAND WA 98034 WEST, LARRY ENV. SCIENTIST MS: OAK-DE-0100 CAS/DDES WHITING KELLY KC DOT RD SERV DIV MS KSC TR 0231 • ~otice of: • Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 Se9JA Threshold Determination, Plat Recommendation & Plat Hearing File#: L05P0019 Project Name: Martin (Type 3) Applicant: CamwestReal Estate Development, Inc. 9720 NE 1201h Place, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 Contact: Sara Slatten Phone# 425-825-1955 ODES Project Manager: Karen Scharer, Project/Program Manager II Phone# 206-296-7114 Email: karen.scharer@metrokc.gov Project Location: 120 feet west of 1481h Ave SE, 100 ft south of SE 1251h St., & 100 ft · north of NE 5th St. (Renton). STR 10-23-05 Parcel# 1023059383 Project Description: A request for a subdivision of 3.71 acres into 13 lots for detached single-family dwellings. The density is 3.5 dwelling units per acre. The lot sizes are mostly 6,700 -7,600 square feet. Permits Requested: Formal Subdivision Department Recommendation to the Hearing Examiner: Approve, subject to conditions SEPA Threshold Determination: Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Issued: January 26, 2007 Date of Public Hearing: March 22, 2007 at 9:30 AM DDES Hearing Room -first floor 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98057-5212 Please Note that two other plats in the neighborhood will be considered on this same day and tim·e (Files L02P0005 and L03P0018). The Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) will issue a written report and recommendation to the Hearing Examiner two weeks prior to the scheduled public .hearing. Persons wishing to receive a copy of the report should contact ODES at the address listed below. Following the close of the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner will issue a written decision which may be appealed to the Metropolitan-King County Council. Appeal procedures will be stated in the Examiner's written decision. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact the Project Manager at the phone number listed above. Written comments may also be submitted to DDES. A public hearing as required by law will be held to consider the approval of this application. If the Renton School District announces a district-wide school closure due to adverse weather conditions or similar area emergency, the public hearing on this matter will be postponed. Interested parties will be notified of the time and date of the rescheduled hearing. Any questions regarding postponements and rescheduling can be directed to the Hearing Examiner's Office at (206) 296-4660. Comment/Appeal Procedure on SEPA Threshold Determination: Comments on this SEPA determination are welcome. This SEPA determination may also be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner. A notice of appeal must be filed with the Land Use Services Division at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on February 20, 2007, and be accompanied with a filing fee of $250.00 payable to the King County Office of Finance. If a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall also file a Statement of Appeal with the Land Use Services Division at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on February 20, 2007. The Statement of Appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including the file number) and the alleged errors in that decision. Further, the Statement of Appeal shall state: 1) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the Statement of Appeal. Failure to timely file a Notice of Appeal, appeal fee or Statement of Appeal, deprives the Hearing Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Appeals must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) at the following address: Date of Mailing: January 26. 2007 DDES--Land Use Services Division Attn: Permit Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 MAtN t:/L"' <;; CQpy If you have any questions regarding the appeal procedures, please contact the Planner at the phone number listed above. If you require this material in Braille, audio cassette, or large print, call (206) 296-6600 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (TTY). You are receiving this notice because our records indicate that you own property within approximately 500 feet or because you requested to receive notice of the decision. ' Goll, Shirley From: Sent: To: Subject: The number is 2007-0082. -----Original Message----- • Masuo, Janet Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:12 PM Goll, Shirley RE: Request for Ordinance No. From: Goll, Shirley Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:19 AM To: Council, Clerk Subject: Request for Ordinance No. • Please e-mail me the ordinance number for the plat of Martin L05P0019 per following attachments thanks « File: Martin Subdivision Agenda.doc » « File: Martin Subdivision cover memo.doc » « File: Martin Subdivision Ord.doc » MAIN FILE COPY 1 ., . ; . Goll, "Shirley From: Sent: To: Subject: • \ \ ./ Goll, Shirley Thursday, January 25, 2007 11: 19 AM Council, Clerk Request for Ordinance No. • ' ' J Attachments: Martin Subdivision Agenda.doc; Martin Subdivision cover memo.doc; Martin Subdivision O~.doc . Please e-mail me the ordinance number for the plat of Martin L05P0019 per following attachments thanks Martin Subdivision Martin Subdivision Martin Subdivision Agenda.doc ... cover memo.... Ord.doc (41... MAtN FILE COpy 1 -' , •·' • • ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton WA 98057-5212 PRELIMINARY PLAT AGENDA HEARING EXAMINER FOR METROPOLITAN-KING COUNTY COUNCIL LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION, BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK KING COUNTY DOES HEARING ROOM 900 OAKESDALE AVE SW, RENTON WA March 22, 2007 -PUBLIC HEARING 9:30 a.m, or as soon thereafter as possible FILE NO. L05P0019-MARTIN SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT REQUEST Owner: Address/Phone: STR: Location: Camwest Real Estate Development, Inc. Attn: Sara Slatten 9720 NE 1201h Place Suite 100, Kirkland, WA 98034 Phone: 425-825-1955 10-23-05 Located 120 feet west of 1481h Ave SE, 100 feet south of Se 1251h St., and 100 feet north of NE 5th St. (Postal City Renton) Land Measurement: 3.71 acres Proposed Use: Fire District: School District: To subdivide into 13 lots for detached single family dwellings. The. proposed density is 3.5 dwelling units per acre. No. 0025 #411 Issaquah • • ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton WA 98057-5219 DATE: TO: FM: RE: January 25, 2007 Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council King County Council Lisa Dinsmore, Planning Supervisor Land Use Services Division Introductory Ordinances for Preliminary Plats Attached are Introductory Ordinance(s) for the Hearing Examiner's agenda scheduled for public hearing, as follows: File No. L05P0019 -MARTIN SUBDIVISION scheduled to be heard on March 22, 2007 A copy of the hearing agenda for each item is also attached for your information. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 296-7171. Attachments •.. .. ..title .. body • • AN ORDINANCE authorizing a subdivision on certain property located 120 feet west of 1481h Ave SE, 100 feet south of Se 1251h St. & 100 feet north of NE 5th St., Renton, at the request of Camwest Real Estate Development, Inc., department of development and environmental services file no. L05P0019 • ' King County Department of Development and Environmental Services State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance for Martin / L05P0019 Date of Issuance: January 26, 2007 Project: Location: Applicant/Contact: King County Contact: King County Permits: This is a request for a subdivision of 3.71 acres into 13 lots for detached single-family dwellings. The proposed density is 3.5 dwelling units per acre. The lot sizes are predominately 6,700 -7,600 square feet. 120 feet west of 1481h Ave SE, 100 feet south of SE 125h St., and 100 feet north of NE 5th St. (Renton). Camwest Real Estate Development, Inc. 9720 NE 1201h Pl~ce, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034. Contact: Sara Slatten Phone # 425-825-1955 Karen Scharer, Project/Program Manager II Phone# 206-296-7114 or email at karen.scharer@metrokc.gov Formal Subdivision Existing Zoning: R-4 Community Plan: Newcastle Basin: May Creek Section/Township/Range: 10-23-05 Parcel# 102305 9383 Notes: A. This finding is based on review of the plan showing the revised preliminary plat received 4/21/2006; SEPA Environmental Checklists, dated 9/28/2005; Level 1 Drainage Analysis Preliminary Storm Analysis by Triad Assoc., dated 9/18/2005; Traffic Analysis by Transportation Engineering Northwest., received 4/21/2006; WSDOT correspondence of 2/27/2003 and 3/14/2003; Certificate of Water Availability, dated 9/13/05; Certificate of Sewer Availability, dated 9/26/2005. B. Issuance of this threshold determination does not constitute approval of the formal subdivision. The application will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable King County Comprehensive Plan Policies and King County Codes which regulate development activities, including the Uniform Fire and Road Standards, Surface Water Design Manual, and the Sensitive Areas Regulations. C. The Residential designation on the Land Use Map of the King County Comprehensive Plan allows for the proposed density. Additionally, this density is within the range per the R-4 Zone. The plat with 13 lots would yield an average density of 3.5 dwellings per acre (based on the site area). The lots will be approximately 6,700 square feet or greater. Exhibit Mo. _...::5=------ ltem No. LO:SP~~,, MAH\l lFILIE co~v Received 'a · ~ -G King County Hearing Examiner L05P0019/SEPA TD January 26, 2007 Page 2 • • D. The subject property is located southwest of the intersection of State Route 900 and 1481h Ave. SE. According to the applicant's traffic analysis, this intersection will operate at Level-of-Service "F" following the development of the proposed plat (unless improvements to the intersection are made). Per the applicant's traffic analysis, approximately 51% of the P.M. peak hour trips from the proposed plat will pass through this intersection. The proposed plat will have a significant adverse impact on this intersection per KCC 14.80.030. E. A horizontal curve exists on the east leg of the SR 900/1481h Ave SE intersection. Based on data provided by the traffic engineer for the plat of Shamrock, which was reviewed by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), the available stopping sight distance on the east leg of the intersection meets the standards of the Washington State Highway Design Manual. F. WSDOT has concluded that, based on turn lane warrants from the Washington State Highway Design Manual, eastbound and westbound ieft turn lanes should be constructed on SR 900 at the 1481 h Ave. intersection. The proposed plat will add vehicular trips to the hazardous westbound left turn movement at this intersection. G. In order to address traffic impacts from the proposed plat, WSDOT has requested that the applicant (along with other development projects that will contribute traffic to the SR 900/1461 h Ave. intersection) improve this intersection with a traffic signal and eastbound and westbound left turn lanes. H. The intersection of SR 900/1641h Ave SE is located approximately one mile east of the subject property. This intersection of SR 900/164 1h Ave SE. is located approximately one mile east of the subject property. This intersection has been identified by WSDOT as a High Accident Location, and lies within a High Accident Corridor. The subject plat will contribute peak .hour trips to this intersection and WSDOT and the King County Department of Transportation have concluded that the subject plat will have a significant adverse impact at the intersection. The installation of a traffic signal at the 1481 h Ave. SE/SR 900 intersection will mitiiate the impact of the proposed plat on the 1641 h Ave. intersection, by diverting traffic away from the 164 intersection to the 1481h intersection, where following signalization, certain turning movements can be made more safety. Threshold Determination The responsible official finds that the above described proposal does not pose a probable significant adverse impact to the environment, provided the mitigation measures listed below are applied as conditions of permit issuance. This finding is made pursuant to RCW 43.21 C, KCC 20.44 and WAC 197-11 after reviewing the environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency and considering mitigation measures which the agency or the applicant will implement as part of the proposal. The responsible official finds this information reasonably sufficient to evaluate the environmental impact of this proposal. Mitigation List The following mitigation measures shall be attached as conditions of permit issuance. These mitigation measures are consistent with policies, plans, rules, or regulations designated by KCC 20.44.080 as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority and in effect when this threshold determination is issued. Key sources of substantive authority for each mitigation measure are in parentheses; however, other sources of substantive authority may exist but are not expres_sly listed. 'L05P0019/SEPA TD • January 26, 2007 • Page 3 1. To mitigate the significant adverse impact the plat of Martin will have on the intersections of SR 900/1481 h Ave SE and SR 900/1641 h Ave SE, the applicant shall install, either individually or in conjunction with other development projects in this area, the following improvements at the SR 900/1481 h Ave intersection: • A traffic signal, and • Eastbound and westbound left turn lanes The design for the SR 900/148 1h Ave intersection improvements shall be approved by the Washington State Department of Transportation (and by King County to the extent such improvements are located in County right-of-way). In addition, at a minimum, the existing entering sight distance looking east for the north and south legs of the intersection (602 feet and 386 feet, respectively) shall not be reduced as part of the .intersection improvements. Documentation shall be submitted to show this requirement is met. All construction work associated with the intersection improvements shall be completed between April 1 '1 and September 30 1 h. This seasonal restriction shall be clearly shown on the final engineering plans. In lieu of the installation of the above-noted intersection improvements prior to final plat approval, the applicant may post a financial guarantee with WSDOT which . assures the installation of these improvements within two years of the recording of Martin. In this event, intersection improvement design must be approved by WSDOT prior to King County approval of the engineering plans for Martin. If the above-noted intersection improvements have already been made by others prior to the recording of Martin, or a financial guarantee has been posted by others which assures the installation of these improvements, then the applicant for Martin shall pay a pro-rata share dollar amount to the developer who has made the improvements or "bonded" for the improvements, in an amount proportional to the impacts of Martin. The pro-rata share dollar amount to be paid shall be set by WSDOT, and documentation shall be provided by the Martin applicant to the King County Land Use Services Division to show this payment has been made, prior to final plat recording. The pro-rata dollar amount to be paid shall be based on the following: • The final Martin lot count • The trip distribution for Martin • The total trips contributed to the intersection of SR 900.1481 h Ave by the plats of Aster Park (LOOP0024 ), Stone Ridge 9L99P3008), East Renton (L02P0005), Shamrock (L02P0014), Rosemonte (aka Ironwood -L03P0018), Martin (L05P0019) and any future land use applications submitted to King County for which compliance with the King County Intersection Standards (KCC 14.80) is required at either the SR 900/148 1h Ave intersection, or the SR 900/164 1 h Ave High Accident Location. In the event that either King County or WSDOT adopts a formal "latecomer's" system prior to final plat recording, that system may be followed in lieu of the approach described above, at the discretion of the applicant, as long as at a minimum there is a financial guarantee which assures the above-noted intersection improvements will be installed within two years of the date of recording of the plat of Martin. [Comprehensive Plan Policy T-303 and King County Code 21A.28.060A] ... L05-~0019/SEPA TD • January 26, 2007 • Page 4 2. Documentation shall be provided to demonstrate to the satisfaction of WSDOT that stopping sight distance (360 feet) is available on the east leg of the SR 900/1481 h Ave intersection. The intersection shall be modified by the applicant, if necessary, so that this stopping sight distance requirement is met on the east leg. In addition, the applicant shall clear vegetation within the right-of-way along SR 900, east of 1481h Ave., to maximize the entering sight distance for the north and south legs of the intersection. [Comprehensive Plan Policy T-303 and King County Comprehensive Policy T-303 and King County Code 21A.28.060AJ An environmental impact statement (EIS) was not required prior to proceeding with the review process. Agencies, affected Native American tribes and the public were offered the opportunity to comment on or appeal the determination for (21 days). Neither the MONS nor the specific mitigation measures were appealed by any party, including the applicant, and they have been incorporated as part of the applicant's proposal. Comments and Appeals The SEPA determination may be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner. Written comments or a notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on February 20, 2007 and be accompanied with a filing fee of $250.00 payable to the King County Office of Finance. . Please reference the file numbers when corresponding. If a SEPA Appeal is filed, the appellant must also file a Statement of Appeal with DOES at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on February 20, 2007. The Statement of Appeal shall identify the decision appealed (including the file number) and the alleged errors in that SEPA decision. The Statement of Appeal shall state: 1) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the Statement of Appeal. Failure to timely file a Notice of Appeal, appeal fee or Statement of Appeal, deprives the Hearing Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Comment/appeal deadline: Appeal filing fee: Address for comment/appeal: Re ponsible Official: Lis Dinsmore, Current Planning Supervisor Current Planning Section Land Use Services Division 4:30 PM on February 20, 2007 $250 check or money order made out to the King County Office of Finance King County Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98057-5212 ATTN: Current Planning Section January 26, 2007 Date Signed ~------------------------------------------------------ ® • • King County Department of Development and Environmental Services State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance for Martin / L05P0019 Date of Issuance: January 26, 2007 Project: Location: Applicant/Contact: King County Contact: King County Permits: This is a request for a subdivision of 3. 71 acres into 13 lots for detached single-family dwellings. The proposed density is 3.5 dwelling units per acre. The lot sizes are _ predominately 6,700 -7,600 square feet. 120 feet west of 1481h Ave SE, 100 feet south of SE 125h St., and 100 feet north of NE 5th St. (Renton). Camwest Real Estate Development, Inc. 9720 NE 1201h Pll,!ce, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 Contact: Sara Slatten Phone# 425-825-1955 Karen Scharer, Project/Program Manager II Phone# 206-296-7114 or email at karen.scharer@metrokc.gov Formal Subdivision Existing Zoning: R-4 Community Plan: Newcastle Basin: May Creek Section/Township/Range: 10-23-05 Parcel# 102305 9383 Notes: A. This finding is based on review of the plan showing the revised preliminary plat received 4/21/2006; SEPA Environmental Checklists, dated 9/28/2005; Level 1 Drainage Analysis Preliminary Storm Analysis by Triad Assoc., dated 9/18/2005; Traffic Analysis by Transportation Engineering Northwest., received 4/21/2006; WSDOT correspondence of 2/27/2003 and 3/14/2003; Certificate of Water Availability, dated 9/13/05; Certificate of Sewer Availability, dated 9/26/2005. B. Issuance of this threshold determination does not constitute approval of the formal subdivision. The application will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable King County Comprehensive Plan Policies and King County Codes which regulate development activities, including the Uniform Fire and Road Standards, Surface Water Design Manual, and the Sensitive Areas Regulations. C. The Residential designation on the Land Use Map of the King County Comprehensive Plan allows for the proposed density. Additionally, this density is within the range per the R-4 Zone. The plat with 13 lots would yield an average density of 3.5 dwellings per acre (based on the site area). The lots will be approximately 6,700 square feet or greater. L05P0019/SEPA TD January 26, 2007 Page 2 • • D. The subject property is located southwest of the intersection of State Route 900 and 1481h Ave. SE. According to the applicant's traffic analysis, this intersection will operate at Level-of-Service "F" following the development of the proposed plat (unless improvements to the intersection are made). Per the applicant's traffic analysis, approximately 51 % of the P.M. peak hour trips from the proposed plat will pass through this intersection. The proposed plat will have a significant adverse impact on this intersection per KCC 14.80.030. E. A horizontal curve exists on the east leg of the. SR 900/148 1h Ave SE intersection. Based on data provided by the traffic engineer for the plat of Shamrock, which was reviewed by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), the available stopping sight distance on the east leg of the intersection meets the standards of the Washington State Highway Design Manual. F. WSDOT has concluded that, based on turn lane warrants from the Washington State Highway Design Manual, eastbound and westbound ieft turn lanes should be constructed on SR 900 at the 1481h Ave. intersection. The proposed plat will add vehicular trips to the hazardous westbound left turn movement at this intersection. G. In order to address traffic impacts from the proposed plat, WSDOT has requested that the applicant (along with other development projects that will contribute trafficto the SR 900/146 1h Ave. intersection) improve this intersection with a traffic signal and eastbound and westbound left turn lanes. H. The intersection of SR 900/1641h Ave SE is located approximately one mile east of the subject property. This intersection of SR 900/1641h Ave SE. is located approximately one mile east of the subject property. This intersection has been identified by WSDOT as a High Accident Location, and lies within a High Accident Corridor. The subject plat will contribute peak hour trips to this intersection and WSDOT and the King County Department of Transportation have concluded that the subject plat will have a significant adverse impact at the intersection. The installation of a traffic signal at the 148'" Ave. SE/SR 900 intersection will miti!i!,ate the impact of the proposed plat on the 1641" Ave. intersection, by diverting traffic away from the 164 intersection to the 1481h intersection, where following signalization, certain turning movements can be made more safety. Threshold Determination The responsible official finds that the above described proposal does not pose a probable significant adverse impact to the environment, provided the mitigation measures listed below are applied as conditions of permit issuance. This finding is made pursuant to RCW 43.21 C, KCC 20.44 and WAC 197-11 after reviewing the environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency and considering mitigation measures which the agency or the applicant will implement as part of the proposal. The responsible official finds this information reasonably sufficient to evaluate the environmental impact of this proposal. Mitigation List The following mitigation measures shall be attached as conditions of permit issuance. These mitigation measures are consistent with policies, plans, rules, or regulations designated by KCC 20.44.080 as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority and in effect when this threshold determination is issued. Key sources of substantive authority for each mitigation measure are in parentheses; however, other sources of substantive authority may exist but are not expressly listed. ; L05P0019/SEPA TD January 26, 2007 Page 3 • • 1. To mitigate the significant adverse impact the plat of Martin will have on the intersections of SR 900/148'" Ave SE and SR 900/164'" Ave SE, the applicant shall install, either individually or in conjunction with other development projects in this area, the following improvements at the SR 900/148'" Ave intersection: • A traffic signal, and • Eastbound and westbound left turn lanes The design for the SR 900/148'" Ave intersection improvements shall be approved by the Washington State Department of Transportation (and by King County to the extent such improvements are located in County right-of-way). In addition, at a minimum, the existing entering sight distance looking east for the north and south legs of the intersection (602 feet and 386 feet, respectively) shall not be reduced as part of the .intersection improvements. Documentation shall be submitted to show this requirement is met. All construction work associated with the intersection improvements shall be completed between April 1 '' and September 30'". This seasonal restriction shall be clearly shown on the final engineering plans. In lieu of the installation of the above-noted intersection improvements prior to final plat approval, the applicant may post a financial guarantee with WSDOT which . assures the installation of these improvements within two years of the recording of Martin. In this event, intersection improvement design must be approved by WSDOT prior to King County approval of the engineering plans for Martin. If the above-noted intersection improvements have already been made by others prior to the recording of Martin, or a financial guarantee has been posted by others which assures the installation of these improvements, then the applicant for Martin. shall pay a pro-rata share dollar amount to the developer who has made the improvements or "bonded" for the improvements, in an amount proportional to the impacts of Martin. The pro-rata share dollar amount to be paid shall be set by WSDOT, and documentation shall be provided by the Martin applicant to the King County Land Use Services Division to show this payment has been made, prior to final plat recording. The pro~rata dollar amour:it to be paid shall be based on the following: • The final Martin lot count • The trip distribution for Martin • The total trips contributed to the intersection of SR 900.148'" Ave by the plats of Aster Park (LOOP0024 ), Stone Ridge 9L99P3008), East Renton (L02P0005), Shamrock (L02P0014 ), Rosemonte (aka Ironwood -L03P0018), Martin (L05P0019) and any future land use applications submitted to King County for which compliance with the King County Intersection Standards (KCC 14.80) is required at either the SR 900/1481h Ave intersection, or the SR 900/164'" Ave High Accident Location. In the event that either King County or WSDOT adopts a formal "latecomer's" system prior to final plat recording, that system may be followed in lieu of the approach described above, at the discretion of the applicant, as long as at a minimum there is a financial guarantee which assures the above-noted intersection improvements will be installed within two years ofthe date of recording of the plat of Martin. [Comprehensive Plan Policy T-303 and King County Code 21A.28.060A] L05P0019/SEPA TD January 26, 2007 Page 4 • • 2. Documentation shall be provided to demonstrate to the satisfaction of WSDOT that stopping sight distance (360 feet) is available on the east leg of the SR 900/1481h Ave intersection. The intersection shall be modified by the applicant, if necessary, so that this stopping sight distance requirement is met on the east leg. In addition, the applicant shall clear vegetation within the right-of-way along SR 900, east of 1481 h Ave., to maximize the entering sight distance for the north and south legs of the intersection. [Comprehensive Plan Policy T-303 and King County Comprehensive Policy T-303 and King County Code 21A.28.060AJ An environmental impact statement (EIS) was not required prior to proceeding with the review process. Agencies, affected Native American tribes and the public were offered the opportunity to comment on or appeal the determination for (21 days). Neither the MONS nor the specific mitigation measures were appealed by any party, including the applicant, and they have been incorporated as part of the applicant's proposal. Comments and Appeals The SEPA determination may be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner. Written comments or a notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on February 20, 2007 and be accompanied with a filing fee of $250.00 payable to the King County Office of Finance. . Please reference the file numbers when corresponding. If a SEPA Appeal is filed, the appellant must also file a Statement of Appeal with DDES at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on February 20, 2007. The Statement of Appeal shall identify the decision appealed (including the file number) and the alleged errors in that SEPAdecision. The Statement of Appeal shall state: 1) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the Statement of Appeal. Failure to timely file a Notice of Appeal, appeal fee or Statement of Appeal, deprives the Hearing Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Comment/appeal deadline: Appeal filing fee: .Address for comment/appeal: LisDmsmore, Current Planning Supervisor Current Planning Section Land Use Services Division 4:30 PM on February 20, 2007 $250 check or money order made out to the King County Office of Finance King County Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98057-5212 A TIN: Current Planning Section January 26. 2007 Date Signed ® • • alotice of: Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division SEl'A Threshold Determination, Plat Recommendation & Plat Hearing 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 File#: L05P0019 Project Name: Martin (Type 3) Applicant: Camwest Real Estate Development, Inc. 9720 NE 1201h Place, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 Contact: Sara Slatten Phone# 425-825-1955 ODES Project Manager: Karen Scharer, ProjecUProgram Manager II Phone# 206-296-7114 Email: karen.scharer@metrokc.gov Project Location: 120 feet west of 1481h Ave SE, 100 ft south of SE 1251h St., & 100 ft north of NE 5th St. (Renton). STR 10-23-05 Parcel # 1023059383 Project Description: A request for a subdivision of 3.71 acres into 13 lots for detached single-family dwellings. The density is 3.5 dwelling units per acre. The lot sizes are mostly 6,700 -7,600 square feet. Permits Requested: Formal Subdivision Department Recommendation to the Hearing Examiner: Approve, subject to conditions SEPA Threshold Determination: Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Issued: January 26, 2007 Date of Public Hearing: March 22, 2007 at 9:30 AM DDES Hearing Room -first floor 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98057-5212 Please Note that two other plats in the neighborhood will be considered on this same day and time (Files L02P0005 and L03P0018). The Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) will issue a written report and recommendation to the Hearing Examiner two weeks prior to the scheduled public .hearing. Persons wishing to receive a copy of the report should contact ODES at the address listed below. Following the close of the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner will issue a written decision which may be appealed to the Metropolitan-King County Council. Appeal procedures will be stated in the Examiner's written decision. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact the Project Manager at the phone number listed above. Written comments may also be submitted to ODES. A public hearing as required by law will be held to consider the approval of this application. If the Renton School District announces a district-wide school closure due to adverse weather conditions or similar area emergency, the public hearing on this matter will be postponed. Interested parties will be notified of the time and date of the rescheduled hearing. Any questions regarding postponements and rescheduling can be directed to the Hearing Examiner's Office at (206) 296-4660. Comment/Appeal Procedure on SEPA Threshold Determination: Comments on this SEPA determination are welcome. This SEPA determination may also be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner. A notice of appeal must be filed with the Land Use Services Division at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on February 20, 2007, and be accompanied with a filing fee of $250.00 payable to the King County Office of Finance. If a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall also file a Statement of Appeal with the Land Use Services Division at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on February 20, 2007. The Statement of Appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including the file number) and the alleged errors in that decision. Further, the Statement of Appeal shall state: 1) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the Statement of Appeal. Failure to timely file a Notice of Appeal, appeal fee or Statement of Appeal, deprives the Hearing Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Appeals must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) at the following address: Date of Mailing: January 26. 2007 DDES--Land Use Services Division Attn: Permit Center ,--· 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest1ADN IF!llE C. Renton, Washington 98057-5212 If you have any questions regarding the appeal procedures, please contact the Planner at the phone number listed above. If you require this material in Braille, audio cassette, or large print, call (206) 296-6600 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (TTY). You are receiving this notice because our records indicate that you own property within approxima~ely 50 eet or because you requested to receive notice of the decision. ' : , if BASIC, SAFET 12601 -148TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 98059 CLAUSSEN, KIM PROGRAM MANAGER Ill MS: OAK -DE-0100 DDES/ LUSD DELANGE JOEL 12438 148TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 DINSMORE, LISA CURRENT PLANNING SUPERVISOR MS: OAK -DE-0100 DDES / LUSD DYE, PETE SR. ENGINEER DDES/LUSD MS: OAK -DE-0100 GILBERT KEITH & CATHY 12609-148TH AVE. SE RENTON, WA 98059 98059 GILLEN, NICK CRITICAL AREA WETLAND REVIEW MS: OAK -DE-0100 DDES / LUSD LANGLEY, KRIS l'RAFFIC ENGINEER MS: OAK -DE-0100 DDES / LUSD PHUNG ANT. 9333 57TH A VE WEST MUKILTEO WA 98275 • L05POOl9 L05POOl9 L05POOl9 L05P0019 L05POOl9 L05P0019 L05POOl9 L05POOl9 L05POOl9 • ING SECTION 0 DDES / LUSD SCHARER, KAREN PROJECT MANAGER II MS: OAK -DE-0 I 00 DDES I LUSD SLA TIEN SARA CAM WEST DEVELOPMENT 9720 NE 120TH PL, #100 KIRKLAND WA 98034 TRIAD ASSOCIATES 12112 115TH AVE NE KIRKLAND WA 98034 WEST, LARRY CRITICAL AREA GEO REVIEW MS: OAK -DE-0100 DDES/LUSD L05POOl9 L05P0019 L05POOl9 L05POOl9 L05POOl9 7708200240/L05POOl9 ARNOLD WILLIAM 12420 147TH PL SE RENTON WA 98059 I 123059017 /L05POO 19 • BASIC VENTURES #510408 C/0 EXECUTIVE HOUSE INC 7517 GREENWOOD A VEN SEATTLE WA 98103 7708200360/L05POOl9 BROWN NICK H 12520 145TH PL SE RENTON WA 98059 1023059069/L05POOl9 CAIRNES CONSTRUCTION LLC 14845 SE 264TH ST KENT WA 98042 5637200360/L05POOl9 CHEUNG CHING BRIAN PAK+PUI SHUEN AMY 5606 NE 4TH CT RENTON WA 98059 7708200400/L05P0019 CHUNG GARY W+KATHERING L 12445 146TH PL SE RENTON WA 98059 I 123059118/L05POOl9 DAUM DERON E+SHANA L 459 NILE PL NE RENTON WA 98059 7708200450/L05POOl9 DORE MOLLY+FARRAR JEROME 12415 146TH PL SE RENTON WA 98059 5637200430/L05P0019 ELLIOTT ROBERT & RUTH 413 LYONS A VE NE RENTON WA 98059 2739200130/L05POOl9 FISHER JOHN AND KATHRYN 12415 149TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 • 1023059026/L05POOl9 BASHARY SHAY I 0025 SE 260TH ST KENT WA 98031 I I 23059122/L05POO 19 BENNICK DERIK+MOUY-LENG 454 NILE PL NE RENTON WA 98059 7708200340/L05POOI9 BROWN RICKI V+CYNTHIA L 12508 145TH PL NE RENTON WA 98059 7708200390/L05POO I 9 CAIRNES CONSTRUCTION LLC 14845 264TH ST KENT WA 98032 5637200290/L05POOl9 CHINN THURMAN & KRISTINA 414 LYONS AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 PL33/L05POOl 9 CITY OF RENTON • ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 2739200071/L05POOl9 DELANGE JOEL J 12438 148TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 I 023059316/L05POOl 9 EBBERT DAVID M 459 NILE A VE NE RENTON WA 98059 I 123059075/L05POOI9 ENGH DALE+ENGH MARYE ROBINSON- 12250 148TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 5637200380/L05P0019 FITTON JAMES A 5522 NE 4TH CT RENTON WA 98059 I023059355/L05POOl9 BASIC SAFET 12601 148TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 2739200080/L05P0019 Bl ELKA RONALD G 18419 SE 122ND ISSAQUAH WA 98027 7708200110/L05P0019 BURWELL JASON R+CHONG C 14701 SE 124TH ST RENTON WA 98059 I 023059383/L05POO 19 CAMWEST DEVELOPMENT INC 9720 NE 120TH PL STE I 00 KIRKLAND WA 98034 I 123059120/L05P0019 CHROMY JONATHAN R 466 NILE PL NE RENTON WA 98059 PL50/L05POO 19 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 3448730020/L05P0019 DO STEVEN+NAGATO TAMAKI 5317NE4THCT RENTON WA 98059 5637200350/L05POOl9 EGBEJIMBA JUDE E+ JOY I 5612NE4THCT RENTON WA 98059 1023059193/L05POOl9 ESQUEDA JUANITA+BARRERA JULIAN 421 NILE AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 2739200050/L05P0019 FLATTUM PATRICIA LEE 12422 148TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 .. UAC-FC/L05P0019 FOUR CREEKS UNINCORPORATED AREA COUNCIL PO BOX 3501 RENTON WA 98056 I 023059341/L05POOI 9 GILBERT KEITH C+CATHERINE C 12609 148TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 1023059I70/L05P0019 · HODGE HAROLD D 19210 121ST PL SE RENTON WA 98055 7708200250/L05P0019 JOSEPH KEVIN R+HEATHER L Kl 12426 147TH PL SE RENTON WA 98059 7708200330/L05P0019 • KIM PYONG+CHRISTIANA SCHUMA 12502 145TH PL SE RENTON WA 98059 7708200440/L05P0019 KOLLARMALIL SAIBEE+MATHEW A 12421 146TH PL SE RENTON WA 98059 7708200410/L05P0019 LEE MARIA GILDA 12439 146TH PL SE RENTON WA 98059 2739200!60/L05P00!9 MAZURKIEWICZ ERIC R 12406 149TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 1123059105/L05POOI9 MEDONICH IV AN M+ TERESA A 5707 NE 4TH PL RENTON WA 98059 1123059121/L05P0019 MOY JAMES THONG+BEA TRICE TANG 460 NILE PL NE RENTON WA 98059 5637200390/L05P0019 FRASER KEITH M+SUSAN E 5516 NE 4TH ST RENTON WA 98059 7708200460/L05P0019 HANSEN MIYIM 12409 146TH PL SE RENTON WA 98059 3448730010/L05P0019 • HUANG KUAN-MING+LI CHING HU 8102118THCTSE NEWCASTLE WA 98056 7708200070/L05P0019 KERSTEN PAUL C+DENISE M 14727 SE 124TH ST RENTON WA 98059 2316800150/L05P0019 KING COUNTY 600 KC ADMIN BLDG SEATTLE WA 98104 2739200020/L05P0019 LA PHONG Q+ANH-YAN T NGUYEN 14815 SE 124TH ST RENTON WA 98059 2739200010/L05POOI9 LUONG SUSAN HY LE 12409 149TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 5637200300/L05POOI9 MCGUIRE NA TASHA 5603 NE 4TH ST RENTON WA 98059 !123059070/L05P0019 METCALF WILLIAM+BERNICE 12260 148TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 I 123059021/L05P0019 MULLENBERG DEAN J+CAROL YN L - TRUST 5816 NE 4TH PL RENTON WA 98059 5637200410/L05POOI9 GARDNER PAUL T+SHELLEY M 425 L VONS A VE NE RENTON WA 98059 7708210110/L05P0019 HERITAGE HOMES INC 4325 SE 323RD ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 5637200370/L05P0019 JAUCIAN JENNIFER+SIU GREGG 5600 NE 4TH CT RENTON WA 98059 7708200420/L05P0019 KIM HEE 12433 146TH PL SE RENTON WA 98059 1023059038/L05P0019 KOCH JOHN E+PATRICIA D 12605 148TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98056 2739200060/L05P0019 LARSON JAMES M+GLORIA E 12430148THAVESE RENTON WA 98059 3448730040/L05POOl9 LUU KAREN K 459 KITSAP PL NE RENTON WA 98059 7708200350/L05P0019 MCWILLIAMS MONZELLE GARY 12514 145TH PL SE RENTON WA 98059 5637200490/L05P0019 MORGAN PLACE HOA C/0 DA YID WHITENER INC PO BOX 808 SEAHURST WA 98062 2739200040/L05P0019 MUNRO RICHARD G 12414 148TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 563720031 O/L05POO 19 MURlLLO OLIVER 5609 NE 4TH CT RENTON WA 98059 • 1023059206/L05P0019 PHO TRAN 5640 NE 4TH ST RENTON WA 98059 1023059320/L05P0019 REED LA WREN CE A 465 NlLE A VE NE RENTON WA 98055 5637200420/L05P0019 REV ARD ABNEY 9375 SW COMMERCE CIR STE 7 WILSONVILLE OR 97070 ·11082003101L05Poo19 SAHA! MALAY A 14623 SE 124TH PL RENTON WA 98059 I 123059093/L05POOI9 SHAHNEW AZ KAZl 5702 NE 4TH PL RENTON WA 98059 27392001 IO/L05P0019 SIKES DONALD K JR 12435 149TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 5637200440/L05POOl9 STPETER MARK 407 LYONS A VE NE RENTON WA 98059 1123059123/L05POOl9 SZACIK MICHAEL+CHRISTINE 472NILEAVENE RENTON WA 98059 3448710090/L05P0019 TOKER EREZ+NANCY A 5310NE4THCT RENTON WA 98059 • I 123059117/L05P0019 NGUYEN TUAN A 5706 NE 4TH PL RENTON WA 98059 1023059042/L05POOl9 PHUNG AN 9333 57TH A VE W MUKILTEO WA 98275 2316800130/L05P0019 RENNE MARK+AUDREY 12338 149TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 1123059124/L05POOl9 • ROBlNSON COREY E+BARKER DON 478 NILE AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 1123059031/L05P0019 SCOTT SHARON ELIZABETH 12610 148TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 7708200040/L05P0019 SHAMROCK HIGHLANDS 9720 NE 120TH PL STE I 00 KIRKLAND WA 98034 SD8/L05POO 19 STEVE CRAWFORD, NEW CONSTRUCTION lSSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT #411 565 NW HOLLY ST ISSAQUAH WA 98027 7708200210/L05P0019 STROTHERS KATHLEEN M+COLEMA 12404 147TH PL SE RENTON WA 98059 7708200380/L05P0019 TAN MlCHAEL M+BETH M 12511 145TH PL SE RENTON WA 98059 5637200330/L05P0019 TOLLlVER MICHAEL J+SALL YA 5624 NE 4TH CT RENTON WA 98059 2739200190/L05POOl9 ORENDORFF GABRIEL+RENNIE 12428 149TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 1023059219/L05P0019 PINCOMBE ROBERTS 451 NILE AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 2739200180/L05P0019 REPENN ROGER L 12422 149TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98055 7708200300/L05P0019 RODICA JEROME 14629 SE 124TH PL RENTON WA 98059 5637200320/L05P0019 SENG JOHNNY 5615 NE 4TH CT RENTON WA 98059 2739200200/L05POOl9 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 12436 149TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 7708200480/L05POOl9 STEWART DUANE A+NADINE W 14601 SE 124TH ST RENTON WA 98059 CG2/L05POOl9 SUSAN SULLlV AN 24311 SE 47TH ST ISSAQUAH WA 98029 11230590 I 5/L05POO 19 TEA HUY 570 I NE 4TH PL RENTON WA 98059 5637200340/L05POOl9 TOYOHARA SCOTT 14023 SE 60TH ST BELLEVUE WA 98006 3448730030/L05P0019 TRUONG TONY+WEN PAULINE 5323 NE 4TH CT RENTON WA 98059 7708200080/L05POOl9 WHITE PAUL A+TINA C 14721 SE 124TH ST RENTON WA 98059 7708200470/L05P0019 YOON SEUNG J 12403 146TH PL SE RENTON WA 98059 • • 1123059119/L05P0019 TSANG SHEK CHUNG+SOK WAI LAU 467 NILE PL NE RENTON WA 98059 5637200400/L05POOl9 WONG TERENCE K+JULIE Y CHEN 431 LYONS AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 1023059192/L05P0019 ZARAGOZA CANDELARIO+CHRISTI 431 NILE AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 2739200170/L05POOl9 VU HUNGD 12414 149TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 7708200090/L05POOl9 WRIGHT GEORGE+NICOLE 14715 SE 124TH ST RENTON WA 98059 3448730050/L05P0019 ZHANG XUAN+BRA VO SERGIO 421 KITSAP PL NE RENTON WA 98059 .. -® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 Project Name: Martin Property Project Address and Parcel Number: 10230593$3 ApplicanVDesign Engineer Name: CamWest/ Rebecca Cushman Address: 121121151" Ave NE ·-.·, Web Date· 0912812005 ROAD STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUEST TO THE COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER For alternate formats. call 206-296-6600. DDES File No.: L Telephone: 425 821-8448 City, State, ZIP: DDES Engineer Initials: Kirkland, WA 98034 D Route Application to LUIS D Check here ii project engineering plans are approved and construction has begun. INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT/DESIGN ENGINEER: Please be sure to include all plans, sketches, photos and maps which may assist in complete review and consideration of your variance request. For a complete list of road variance submittal requirements, refer to separate list from DOES. Failure to provide all pertinent information may result in delayed processing or denial of request. Please submit this request and applicable fee to the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) Permit Center at 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219. To make an appointment for permit submittal, please call 206-296-6797. For more information, refer to the ODES Web site, www.metrokc.gov/ddes. I · ',, · REFER TO•SECTION 1.08 OF THE 'KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS FOR VARIANCES DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUEST: Intersection Stopping Sight Distance: Illumination on Sag Curve. APPLICABLE SECTION(S) OF STANDARDS: 1993 KC Road Standards 2.12C and D. to JUSTIFICATION (see attachments, pages see attached ----___ ): AUTHORIZATION SIGNATURES: ODES STAFF RECOMMENDATION County Roa Engineer: NSPORTATION AUTHORIZATION Conditioned A roval D Denied Date Date Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes RoadStandardsVarReq6_ 19_07.doc le-req-rdvar.pdl 0912812005 Page 1 of 1 • King County Roads and Engineering Dh-ision Department of Public Works 'resler Building .;oo Tusler Wnv Room -t-00 Seattle, \VA 98104·2637 April 27, 1994 TO: Gary Kohler, Manager, Land Use Services Division • Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) TfN: Jim Sanders, P.E., Development Engineer VI loyd Neal, P .E., Traffic Engineer, Traffic and Planning Section F ulette Norman P.E., Development Review Engineer RECEIVED r~!N ~; \) t I~j/'-f i'\' LAi~D US[ ~:UNiC[S King County's illumination requirements on arterial streets differ from those required by Puget Power for residential streets: Section 2.12C, of the 1993 King County Road Standards, allows DDES to approve illumination as a means of mitigating deficient sag vertical curves for night time conditions. In an effort to eliminate inconsistencies in illumination designs, this office met with Puget Power regarding criteria for illuminating sag vertical curves on residential streets. We mutually agreed on a minimum light level of0.4 foot-candles and a 6:1 uniformity ratio. To meet these criteria, design residential street lighting as follows: l 00 watt High Pressure Sodium luminaires 25 foot mounting height l 00 to 120 foot spacing, throughout the sag curve, as defined by King County Road Standards Illumination plans, which incorporate these elements, will provid6 night. time stopping sight distance on roadway widths of22 to 36 feet, without excessive illumination of neighboring homes. I request that your engineering review staff utilize these standards in future considerations. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Paulette Norman at 296-6596. cc: Greg Frisbee, Lighting Engineer, Puget Power Harold Taniguchi, Interim Manager, Roads and Engineering Division f:\sh\lr\li&}itdoc -~- A TIN: Tom Benek, Road Variance Engineer, Engineering Services Linda Smith, Signal Operations and Design Engineer -------------------------------~---~--------------------------------·--·-·---' '' June 19, 2007 Jim Sanders King County ODES 900 Oaksdale Ave. S.W. MS IB Renton, WA 98055-1219 RE: Martin Property • King County Project # L05POO 19 (Triad Job No. 04-257) Dear Jim: • 121!21!5thAvenueNE Kirkland, WA 98034~6929 425.821.8448 425821.3481 fax 800.488.0756 toll free www.triadassoc.com Please review the enclosed variance for one illuminated sag curve on a sub-access street (see enclosed exhibit). The proposed SE 125 1 h Street is classified as a sub-access street with a design speed of 25 mph and an approximate length of 230 feet ending at both ends as "T" intersections. The curve in question is between STA I +27.38 to 2+77.38 (50 feet). By calculation, utilizing intersection stopping sight distance of 125 feet, a minimum length of curve of 158 feet is needed. The request of the variance is due to physical constraints of connecting to existing roadways at the east and west limits of the proposed road and private properties located beyond the north and south rights-of-way line limiting grade changes. The proposed road is not intended to be extended to the east or west in the future. Historically, these requests have been requested and granted for substandard sag curves that can be mitigated with illumination for nighttime stopping sight distance. Illumination will be provided, spaced per the King County Road Standards (KCRS). The standard landing is provided at the intersection as required by KCRS Section 2.1 O C. Please let me know if you require any further information for your consideration of this request. Sincerely, ~I T.._E_S ___ _ Rebecca Cushman, P.E. Project Engineer Land Development Consultants l .. • • April 3, 2007 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER REPORT AND DECISION KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 400 Y esler Way, Room 404 Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 296-4660 Facsimile (206) 296-1654 Email: hearex@metrokc.gov SUBJECT: Department of Development and Environmental Services File No. LOSPOOI9 Proposed Ordinance no. 2007-0082 Location: Applicant: MARTIN Preliminary Plat Application 120 feet west of 148th Avenue Southeast, I 00 feet south of Southeast 125th Street and 100 feet north of Northeast 5th Street, Renton Cam West Real Estate Dev., Inc. represented by Robert Johns, Attorney Johns Monroe Mitsunaga 1601 -I 14th Ave. SE,# 110 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Telephone: (425) 467-9960 Facsimile: (425) 451-2818 King County: Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) represented by Karen Scharer 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Telephone: (206) 296-7114 Facsimile: (206) 296-7051 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS/DECISION: Department's Preliminary Recommendation: Department's Final Recommendation: Examiner's Decision: EXAMINER PROCEEDINGS: Approve, subject to conditions Approve, subject to conditions (modified) Approve, subject to conditions (modified) Hearing Opened: March 22, 2007 Hearing Closed: March 22, 2007 Participants at the public hearing and the exhibits offered and entered are listed in the attached minutes. • • L05POO 19 -Martin Page 2 of 13 A verbatim recording of the hearing is available in the office of the King County Hearing Examiner. ISSUES AND TOPICS ADDRESSED: Access • Surface water drainage • Property ownership and encroachments SUMMARY: The proposed subdivision of3.71 acres into 31 lots in the urban area is approved subject to conditions. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: l. General Information: Developer: Engineer: STR: Location: Parcel: Zoning: Acreage: Number of Lots: Density: Lot Size: Proposed Use: Sewage Disposal: Water Supply: Fire District: School District: Camwest Real Estate Development, Inc. 9720 NE 120'" Place, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 Contact: Sara Slatten 425-825-1955 Triad Associates 12112 115'" Ave NE Kirkland, WA 98034 Contact: Gerry Buck 425-821-8448 10-23-05 120 feet west of 148'" Ave SE, I 00 feet south of SE 125" St., and 100 feet north of NE s'" St. (Renton) 102305 9383 R-4 3.71 acres 13 Approximately 3.5 units per acre 6,700 -7,600 square feet in size Single Family Detached Dwellings City of Renton Water District# 90 City of Renton Issaquah School District Complete Application Date: October 26, 2005 " • • L05POOl 9 -Mmtin Page 3 of 13 2. Except as modified herein, the facts set forth in the King County Land Use Services Division's preliminary report to the King County Hearing Examiner for the March 22, 2007, public hearing are found to be correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. The LUSD staff recommends approval of the application, subject to conditions. 3. This proposed subdivision is south and east of the plat of Shamrock. Access to this subdivision will be from 148th Avenue Southeast, through the north portion of Shamrock, and from Northeast 4th Street, through the south portion of Shamrock. This plat will participate in funding a traffic signal and associated improvements being constructed at the intersection of SR 900 and 148th Avenue Southeast, to mitigate its adverse impacts to that intersection and the intersection of 164th Avenue Southeast and SR 900. This subdivision will also construct road frontage and off-site improvements along Southeast 125th Street, west from the project entrance, to connect with 144th Place Southeast, to provide access to the south. These improvements are planned to be constructed partly on right-of-way dedicated to King County by the recorded plat of Shamrock. The adjacent property owner claims an interest in a portion of the Southeast 125th Street right-of-way dedicated by Shamrock. However, King County does not recognize that interest as impairing the right-of-way dedication. In the event it is detennined through legal proceedings that the property to the west is not available as dedicated right-of-way, the access to the Martin plat from the north would be sufficient to serve this development without an alternative access to the west and south. 4. The Martin property slopes down from east to west. No surface water runoff from the planned development of the Martin property will flow onto the adjacent properties to the east. 5. There will be no access to any of the lots within the proposed subdivision directly from 148th Avenue Southeast. The strip of land approximately 120 feet by 15 feet, that is shown as a panhandle of proposed lot 5, will be segregated from lot 5 and established as a separate tract. 6. All students residing within the subject property will be bussed to the elementary, junior high and high schools that serve the area. The bus stop that is proposed to serve students within this plat will be located at Southeast 124th Street and 148th Avenue Southeast. With the construction of urban improvements within this subdivision, safe walking conditions will exist from all lots within this plat to the bus stop. Improvements necessary to be made on 148th Avenue Southeast to provide for a safe bus loading zone will be constructed by other developments that are required to make improvements to 148th Avenue Southeast. The subject property has no frontage on 148th A venue Southeast, other than the 15 foot wide "panhandle" tract that is used for a driveway to an adjacent property owner's garage. CONCLUSIONS: 1. If approved subject to the conditions recommended below, the proposed subdivision will comply with the goals and objectives of the King County Comprehensive Plan, subdivision and zoning codes, and other official land use controls and policies of King County. 2. If approved subject to the conditions recommended below, this proposed subdivision will make appropriate provision for the public health, safety and general welfare, and for open spaces, drainage ways, streets, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supply, sanitary waste, • • LOSPOO 19 -Ma1tin Page 4 of 13 parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds and safe walking conditions for students who only walk to school; and it will serve the public use and interest. 3. The conditions for final plat approval recommended below are in the public interest and are reasonable and proportionate requirements necessary to mitigate the impacts of the development upon the environment. 4. The dedications of land or easements within and adjacent to the revised preliminary plat, as required for final plat approval or as shown on the proposed preliminary plat submitted by the Applicant on April 21, 2006, are reasonable and necessary as a direct result of the development of this proposed plat, and are proportionate to the impacts of the development. 5. The applicant has agreed to provide off site improvements on the alignment of Southeast I 25th Street, between the plat entrance road and 144th Place Southeast, in order to provide improved access to future residents of the subdivision, as well as the residents of the adjacent plat of Shamrock to the north and west of the subject property. In the event dedicated right-of-way is not available to complete those improvements, access to the north only will be sufficient to adequately serve the proposed subdivision. 6. The proposed plat of Martin will have no adverse impact upon surface water drainage that affects, or will affect, the adjacent properties lying between the Martin plat and 148th Avenue Southeast. DECISION: The proposed preliminary plat of Martin, as revised and received on April 21, 2006, is approved, subject to the following conditions of final plat approval: I. Compliance with all platting provisions of Title 19A of the King County Code. 2. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final plat a dedication that includes the language set forth in King County Council Motion No. 5952. 3. The plat shall comply with the base density and minimum density requirements of the R-4 zone classification. All lots shall meet the minimum dimensional requirements of the R-4 zone classification or shall be shown on the face of the approved preliminary plat, whichever is larger, except that minor revisions to the plat which do not result in substantial changes may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environment Services. All plat boundary discrepancies shall be resolved to the satisfaction of DOES prior to the submittal of the final plat documents. As used in this condition, "discrepancy" is a boundary hiatus, an overlapping boundary or a physical appurtenance which indicates an encroachment, lines of possession or a conflict of title. 4. The applicant must obtain final approval from the King County Health Department. 5. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the King County Road Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No. 11187, as amended (1993 KCRS). • • • LOSPOO 19 -Mattin Page5of13 6. The applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main, and fire flow standards of Chapter 17.08 of the King County Code. All future residences constructed within this subdivision are required to be sprinklered (NFPA l 3D) unless the requirement is removed by the King County Fire Marshal or his/her designee. The Fire Code requires all portions of the exterior walls of structures to be within 150 feet (as a person would walk via an approved route around the building) from a minimum 20-foot wide, unobstructed driving surface. To qualify for removal of the sprinkler requirement, driving surfaces between curbs must be a minimum of 28 feet in width when parking is allowed on one side of the roadway, and a minimum of 36 feet in width when parking is permitted on both sides. The road width requirement applies to both on-site access and roads accessing the subdivision. Storm Drainage 7. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval, which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. a. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual. DOES approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. b. Standard plan notes and a construction sequence as specified in the King County drainage manual shall be shown on the engineering plans (Reference Section 7B). c. A storm water pollution prevention and spill (SWPPS) plan shall be included with the project engineering plans as required in Chapter 2 of the drainage manual. d. Storm water facilities shall be designed using the KCRTS conservation flow control standard. Water quality facilities shall also be provided using the basic water quality protection menu. If the proposed onsite storm water pond is used as a wet pond for water quality treatment, the facility shall be revised as necessary to comply with requirements for a 3:1 flow path for water quality treatment as outlined in the drainage manual. e. To implement the required Best Management Practices (BMP's) for treatment of storm water, the final engineering plans and technical information report (TIR) shall clearly demonstrate compliance with all applicable design standards. The requirements for best management practices are outlined in Chapter 5 of the drainage manual. The design engineer shall address the applicable requirements on the final engineering plans and provide all necessary documents for implementation. The final recorded plat shall include all required covenants, easements, notes, and other details to implement the required BMP's for site development. f. All runoff control facilities shall be located in a separate tract and dedicated to King Ul5POOl9-Martin • • Page 6 of 13 County unless portions of the drainage tract are used for recreation space in accordance with KCC 21A.14.180. g. During preliminary review, the applicant received approval for a drainage adjustment (L06V0043) regarding the building setbacks for constructing an offsite drainage pipe within the adjacent plat of Shmmock. The final engineering plans shall show the design requirements for constructing the off site pipe and demonstrate compliance with all conditions of approval as listed in the drainage adjustment decision. To assure adequate capacity is provided for conveyance of stom1 water from the onsite detention pond, the overflow system and conveyance pipe shall be designed at a minimum for the 1 OOyear storm based upon developed site conditions. h. As depicted by field topography on the site plans, an upstream drainage basin is located east of the subject property. The final engineering plans shall be designed to address any requirements for bypass of upstream drainage as described on page 1-42 in the drainage manual. Due to groundwater conditions on the site, the design engineer shall also evaluate the need for interceptor trenches and easements for conveyance of drainage. As shown in applicants drainage report site map, an existing french drain is located in the eastern portion of the site which should be removed or relocated. Based upon the final designs, drainage easements may be required to convey surface or ground water through the project. i. As shown on the applicant's preliminary site plans, the existing storm system located near the west property line shall be removed during site construction. The existing pipes and catch basins shall be shown on the final engineering plans with applicable notes and/or design requirements for removal. Access/Roads 8. The proposed subdivision shall comply with the 1993 King County Road Standards (KCRS) including the following requirements: a. Road A shall be improved as an urban minor access street. b. The frontage road (SE I 25th St) along Tract A shall be improved full width as an urban subaccess street and shall extend westerly from the project entrance at 146'" Ave SE to J44<h Place within the Shamrock plat. Sixteen feet of additional right-of-way shall be dedicated for completion of the road improvements. A temporary cul-de-sac located on lots 38 and 39 within the Shamrock plat shall be removed upon completing the road connection. Design standards for removing a temporary cul-de-sac are provided in KCRS 2.080. In the event off site right-of-way is not available to construct improvements to connect with 144th Place Southeast, Southeast 125th Street shall be improved in the manner stated above to the west boundary of the Martin plat. A temporary cul-de-sac or other provision for emergency vehicle tum around may be required by the King County Fire Marshal. c. As shown on the preliminary plat map, an existing easement for ingress and egress is located along the north boundary of the plat and extends easterly to 148'" Ave SE. Any rights of direct vehicular access to 148th A venue Southeast granted to the Martin • ---------------------------------- • • L05POO l 9 -Martin Page 7 of 13 property by this easement shall be extinguished prior to or concurrent with final plat recording. d. Street trees shall be included in the design of all road improvements, and shall comply with Section 5.03 of the KCRS. e. Modifications to the road standards shown above may be considered by King County pursuant to the variance procedures in KCRS 1.08. f. (Deleted) 9. There shall be no direct vehicular access between this plat and 148'" Ave SE, except for the existing driveway that serves the abutting property from the 15 foot wide "panhandle" tract. A note to this effect shall appear on the engineering plans and the final plat. I 0. Off-site access to the subdivision shall be over a full-width, dedicated and improved road which has been accepted by King County for maintenance. If the proposed access road has not been accepted by King County at the time ofrecording, then said road shall be fully bonded by the applicant of this subdivision. 11. (Deleted) Mitigation/Impact Fees 12. The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by the applicable fee ordinance. The applicant has the option to either: (I) pay the MPS fee at the final plat recording, or (2) pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the plat that reads, "All fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), have been paid." If the second option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of building permit application. 13. Lots within this subdivision are subject to King County Code 21 A.43, which imposes impact fees to fund school system improvements needed to serve new development. As a condition of final approval, fifty percent (50%) of the impact fees due for the plat shall be assessed and collected immediately prior to the recording, using the fee schedules in effect when the plat receives final approval. The balance of the assessed fee shall be allocated evenly to the dwelling units in the plat and shall be collected prior to building permit issuance. • • LOSPOOl 9 -Martin Page 8 of 13 Recreational Area 14. The plat shall provide suitable recreation space consistent with the requirements of K.C.C. 21A. l 4. I 80 and K.C.C. 21 A. 14.190 (i.e., children's play equipment, sport court[s], picnic table[s], benches, etc.). Other a. A detailed recreation space plan (i.e., location, area calculations, dimensions, landscape specs, equipment specs, etc.) shall be submitted for review and approval by DOES prior to or concurrent with the submittal of engineering plats. b. A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording of the plat. 15. A homeowners' association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction of DOES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the recreation, open space and/or sensitive area tract(s). 16. To implement K.C.C. 16.82 which applies to the site, a detailed tree retention plan shall be submitted with the engineering plans for the subject plat. The tree retention plan (and engineering plans) shall be consistent with the requirements ofK.C.C. 16.82, as well as the conceptual tree retention plan ( dated April 21, 2006). No clearing of the subject property is permitted until the final tree retention plan is approved by LUSD. Flagging and temporary fencing of trees to be retained shall be provided, consistent with K.C.C. 16.82 The placement of impervious surfaces, fill material, excavation work, or the storage of construction materials is prohibited within the fenced areas around preserved trees, except for grading work permitted pursuant to K.C.C. 16.82. 17. Street trees shall be provided as follows (per KCRS 5.03 and K.C.C. 21 A.16.050): a. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. b. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. c. If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. d. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the county has adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. e. The species of trees shall be approved by DOES if located within the right-of-way, and • • • LOSPOO 19 -Maitin Page 9 of 13 SEPA shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. f. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by DOES prior to engineering plan approval. g. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DDES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. h. A landscape inspection fee shall also be submitted prior to plat recording. The inspection fee is subject to change based on the current county fees. 18. The following have been established by SEPA as necessary requirements to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of this development. The applicants shall demonstrate compliance with these items prior to final approval. 1.) To mitigate the significant adverse impact the plat of Martin will have on the intersections of SR 900/l48'h Ave SE and SR 900/164'" Ave SE, the applicant shall install, either individually or in conjunction with other development projects in this area, the following improvements at the SR 900/148'" Ave intersection: • A traffic signal, and • Eastbound and westbound left tum lanes The design for the SR 900/l 48'h Ave intersection improvements shall be approved by the Washington State Department of Transportation (and by King County to the extent such improvements are located in County right-of-way). In addition, at a minimum, the existing entering sight distance looking east for the north and south legs of the intersection ( 602 feet and 386 feet, respectively) shall not be reduced as part of the intersection improvements. Documentation shall be submitted to show this requirement is met. All construction work associated with the intersection improvements shall be completed between April 1 '' and September 30'h. This seasonal restriction shall be clearly shown on the final engineering plans. In lieu of the installation of the above-noted intersection improvements prior to final plat approval, the applicant may post a financial guarantee with WSDOT which assures the installation of these improvements within two years of the recording of Martin. In this event, intersection improvement design must be approved by WSDOT prior to King County approval of the engineering plans for Martin. If the above-noted intersection improvements have already been made by others prior to the recording of Martin, or a fmancial guarantee has been posted by others which assures the installation of these improvements, then the applicant for Martin shall pay a pro-rata share dollar • • L05POOl 9 -Mai1in Page 10 of 13 amount to the developer who has made the improvements or "bonded" for the improvements, in an amount proportional to the impacts of Martin. The pro-rata share dollar amount to be paid shall be set by WSDOT, and documentation shall be provided by the Martin applicant to the King County Land Use Services Division to show this payment has been made, prior to final plat recording. The pro-rata dollar amount to be paid shall be based on the following: • The final Martin lot count • The trip distribution for Martin • The total trips contributed to the intersection of SR 900.148'" Ave by the plats of Aster Park (LOOP0024), Stone Ridge (L99P3008), East Renton (L02P0005), Shamrock (L02POO 14 ), Rosemonte ( aka Ironwood -L03POO 18), Martin (L05POO 19) and any future land use applications submitted to King County for which compliance with the King County Intersection Standards (KCC 14.80) is required at either the SR 900/1481 " Ave intersection, or the SR 900/164'" Ave High Accident Location. In the event that either King County or WSDOT adopts a formal "latecomer's" system prior to final plat recording, that system may be followed in lieu of the approach described above, at the discretion of the applicant, as long as at a minimum there is a financial guarantee which assures the above-noted intersection improvements will be installed within two years of the date of recording of the plat of Martin. [Comprehensive Plan Policy T-303 and King County Code 21A.28.060A] 2.) Documentation shall be provided to demonstrate to the satisfaction ofWSDOT that stopping sight distance (360 feet) is available on the east leg of the SR 900/148'" Ave intersection. The intersection shall be modified by the applicant, if necessary, so that this stopping sight distance requirement is met on the east leg. In addition, the applicant shall clear vegetation within the right-of-way along SR 900, east of 148'" Ave., to maximize the entering sight distance for the north and south legs of the intersection. [Comprehensive Plan Policy T-303 and King County Comprehensive Policy T-303 and King County Code 21A.28.060AJ ORDERED this 3rd day of April, 2007. James N. O'Connor King County Hearing Examiner pro tern TRANSMITTED this 3rd day of April, 2007, to the parties and interested persons ofrecord: Safit Basic Joel Delange Keith & Cathy Gilbert 12601 -148th Ave. SE 12438 -148th Ave. SE 12609 -148th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Robert D. Johns Andy T. Phung Christi Schumann Johns Monroe Mitsunaga 9333 -57th Ave. W 12502 -145th Pl. SE 1601 -I 14th Ave. SE,# 110 Mukilteo WA 98275 Renton WA 98059 Bellevue WA 98004 Seattle KC Health Dept. Sara Slatten Triad Associates • • • • LOSPOO 19 -Maitin Page II ofl3 E. Dist. Environ. Health Cam West Development 12112 -115th Ave. NE 14350 SE Eastgate Way 9720 NE 120th Pl # l 00 Kirkland WA 98034 Bellevue WA 98007 Kirkland WA 98034 Kim Claussen Lisa Dinsmore Peter Dye DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 Ray Florent Nick Gillen Shirley Goll DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 Kristen Langley Karen Scharer Steve Townsend DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 Larry West Kelly Whiting DDES/LUSD KC DOT, Rd. Srvcs. Div. MS OAK-DE-0100 MS KSC-TR-0231 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL In order to appeal the decision of the Examiner, written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the King County Council with a fee of $250.00 (check payable to King County Office of Finance) on or before April 17, 2007. If a notice of appeal is filed, the original and six (6) copies of a written appeal statement specifying the basis for the appeal and argument in support of the appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the King County Council on or before April 24, 2007. Appeal statements may refer only to facts contained in the hearing record; new facts may not be presented on appeal. Filing requires actual delivery to the Office of the Clerk of the Council, Room 1025, King County Courthouse, 516 3ro Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104, prior to the close of business ( 4:30 p.m.) on the date due. Prior mailing is not sufficient if actual receipt by the Clerk does not occur within the applicable time period. The Examiner does not have authority to extend the time period unless the Office of the Clerk is not open on the specified closing date, in which event delivery prior to the close of business on the next business day is sufficient to meet the filing requirement. !fa written notice of appeal and filing fee are not filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date of this report, or if a written appeal statement and argument are not filed within twenty-one (21) calendar days of the date of this report, the decision of the hearing examiner contained herein shall be the final decision of King County without the need for further action by the Council. RECEIVED JUL 1 ll 2007 KING COUNTY LAND USE SERVICES • • L05POO l 9 -Martin Page 12 of 13 MINUTES OF THE MARCH 22, 2007, PUBLIC HEARING ON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FILE NO. L05P0019. James N. O'Connor was the Hearing Examiner in this matter. Participating in the hearing were Karen Scharer, Pete Dye, Kristen Langley and Ray Floren! representing the Department; Robert Johns representing the Applicant, and Andy Phung and Safet Basic. The following Exhibits were offered and entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1 ODES file no. L05POOI 9 Exhibit No. 2 DOES March 22, 2007, preliminary report for file no. L05P0019, with attachments as follow: 2.1. Plat Map w/13 Lot Plat Design 2.2. City of Renton Sewer Availability 2.3. Surface Water Management Variance/L06V0043 2.4. Density Calculations w/R-4 zoning 2.5. ROW/Easement Exhibit, 2 pages Exhibit No. 3 Application for land use pennit/plat no. L05P00! 9 received 9/28/2005 Exhibit No. 4 SEPA Checklist received 9/28/2005 Exhibit No. 5 SEPA Mitigated Determination ofNonsignificance issued 1/26/2007 Exhibit No. 6 Affidavit of posting for Notice of Application indicating posting date of 11/4/2005; received by DOES on 11/8/2005 Exhibit No. 7 Revised Site plan (13 lot preliminary plat map) received 4/21/2006 Exhibit No. 8 Assessor's maps (2) -SE 10-23-05 & SW 11-23-05 Exhibit No. 9 Level 1 Downstream Analysis by Triad Associates, date received 9/28/2005 Exhibit No. IO Traffic Impact Analysis by Transportation Engineering North West , received 4/21/2006 Exhibit No. 11 Request for School Information Form from Issaquah School District, received 11/12/2005 Exhibit No. 12 Email from Sara Slatten to Noreen Anderson dated 4/6/2005, with 14 pages of attachments Exhibit No. 13 Vicinity Map for L05P0019, L03P0018 & L02P0005, prepared by KC staff on 3/19/2007 Exhibit No. 14 DOES Field Report and GIS Information dated 11/3/2005 Exhibit No. 15 Letter (with 17 attachments) from A Phung, received 4/18/2006 Exhibit No. 16 Email to & from A Phung, re: ownership of 16' wide strip, dated 11/23/2005 Exhibit No. 17 Email (with 7 attachments) from Safet Basic re: road improvements & flooding dated 2/6/2006 Exhibit No. 18 Letter from Sara Slatten re: response to request for information & Phung/ownership, dated 6/22/2006 Exhibit No. 19 Email from Sara Slatten dated 7/12/2006 regarding Summary of An Phung discussions, forwarded by Kim Claussen on 7/13/2006 with 3 attachments Exhibit No. 20 Letter ( with enclosures -3 pages) from Eric Campbell of Cam West to 'A Phung re: resolution of property ownership, etc, dated 9/14/2005 I• ... : ._;;; ''"•I! I .. L05POO 19. Mai1in Exhibit No. 21 Exhibit No. 22 Exhibit No. 23 Exhibit No. 24 Exhibit No. 25 Exhibit No. 26 JNOC:gao L05P0019 RPT • • Page 13 of 13 1121/2005 email from Safet Basic regarding property lines & noise with undated response from Lanny Henoch 11/28/2005 email from K & C Gilbert with l 1/29/2005 response re: sewer extension to their property Email from Ray Florent re: ownership documentation, dated 6/22/2006 Email from Ray Florcnt re: ownership documentation, dated 6/28/2006 Letter from A Phung, re: property ownership, dated 3/19/2007 Testimony of Raymond Florent dated 3/22/2007 ' ! I , Ii !! '-,, i~ !! Ii H ~; ~i i·; J ;{ H li ,i ·-• MAIDI-Q.lllll Wi --~__:.:__J_ PLAT Of SHAMROCK ¥w "!m, 12° I[ 4)98/J (IN-N) flj 15· Jt 4J9 65 (WI-S)(IN-1;) ------ff>i-1*f.l- -7------ RECEIVED JUL l 6 2201 KING GOUNTY bAN9 us~ SEllVIG~9 ,.,, "'62 . .JO. 1 ~~ cf5,.85 \ 6" I[ 452U (DS,;r,) 12· IC <5'-17 (OSCN} NCW TOP 454 )5 W/'SIJUO ((Xl(JN(;U:, N('tr 2(!'-1:t" (N) (CC/Nll?AC:TOII IV l{'Pl'Y 12" IC) :ii • • SE 1/4, SE 1/4, SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23N., RANGE SE., W.M. I I Pl.Ai Of I ' ! ~~ l"AS(U[N I .. ~-~-m-! REC. NG. 528•21~ , I 15' ' "' t ASO,Off \ \ J", \ -· . : U I \ !!;l:rll,'/\'ll>j" \ ti I ;/ 6 ·, : :,: .-:_~ OCTAU Mcf;~N PLACE voL. 2Ps. PG!sl Ga-n 1 ,---,I,~-, , 1 1 I I r----1 ,J ! '. ' : : ' ;jPAD lL ~58.Bj : : ' : : i i 'I l_l 5" -.(lrP) '-· \ I ; C ;i r~~-- c I lu. /JU/WING I -1.. __ J 1--- 1,01."30'?9'3"13_..! I I ; I I LI I ~?,""" ,. ,~, r=~ I I r-1 "~ $ ,o'2.'2>o13fo?>a YAl/0 DR""' ~ ,~- l)RAJN (WI.Y ' \0'2-'3C)S93A \ YARD flfU//1 rOP •59.o --DllAJN ON!.i SCALE: 1" = 40' 0 • • f---- GSllf'f'P NQlfS· ALL POUUrANTS, INCI.IXJINC WASrt MATf/1/AJ.S AN{) DOIOU1ION /X8Rf5. TliAr OCCl/ff ONS/rt SHALL OE Hl4ND!.,:C, AND Dl5PCSEP OF IN A MANNOI /H,<r (!0£5 NOr CAUSl' CONWJINA"f/()N OF SroFIIIWMU.. C0CV HOUSEl(Ef:l'ING AA{) P1'£\,9/FA711(" M£ASlJRC5 11U. 8£ TAK£N TO <NSURf THAT THE 'i11f "71..(. 8E l(U'T a£AN, lt[U ORGANIZF!I. ANO fRfE OF DCBfllS. NO P!J.1.UTION PfffXJUCTS ~ TO 11£ STORED ON 11<£" 'i1rE UN!.CiS A Pl.AN ,S Sl/fJlll/("fED AN() APf>RO.a> 8Y /(/NG COUNIY = A DETM[O usr OF PC~SONS SHAU BE SUBM/TTUJ ro l(!NC COUNIY DDn Pl?ll)fl ro ANY CONS1RUCfJ()N ACml!TY ON 7HE: 'i11f INCI.UOING THE TcSC SVP£fft!SOR AND PCflSONNU flf:SPONSIB!.£ FOR = Pr«JP£R RUUtuNC or CONSmucm,,i [QIM'ICNT AN() CONTNN/NG ANY ="fE WASHOIH f"ACII.IIY. POIIT-'Bff SAJ,IJrMION f"ACVl!f"S 11U. BE FIR'II.Y SEOJRU!. ~GI.A.ARL r 11.AJNTAJN(IJ, ANO [WPl1U! 'M<EN N£Ct:SSAll'1'. sa.10 WASIE i!<LL 8f S10Rt:D IN SEOJ~. CJ.IA/11. r IIMll<f;D CON TA!/IER5. I sec AUGNJ./£Nr PU.N. FOR HORJ.ZONrAL. CU'i'V..~ MC h ~ ROAD 0/ll~~s. SHffr ~ _ _ ________ _ 1/<CONNCCr ON£ OOMNSPOUr ro &i',on F"/t.1.£f) rRENOI.. THIS 81.lP ro PROYrDC TRCATMCNr FOR 700 SF OF ROOF DRAJW.GE. PROYrOC ACCCSS DURING CONSTRUCnON ro LOCAL TRAFFIC/ CXISnNG ORIVCWA I'S sm: PRfPARAr/ON, FLL CXC1VAncw AND COIJPACTION RCCOUUENOATIONS ARC LOCATED IN TH£ G£07CCHNICAL CNGJNffRING RCPORr BY ASSOOATCO CARTH SCICNC£S, INC. OArcD 1/27/05 [ M.L CA rOi BASINS 1D BC nPE" I UNLESS OTH£Rt1tfSE SffQFl£D. [ AU CArOi BASINS 1D HAVE VANED GRAlfS fJM£5S 0TH£Rt11fSC SP£CIF1CD. = CAT'CH BASINS HAVC BITN SiZED TO uccr CUR'1£NT KING COUNTY ANO i.soor KNOCKOIH RCOUIROIENTS U9NG ADS N-12 ~- CONTRACrr:R UAY IIO'i'K DtRCCTtY 11111-I CAT'CH BASIN lrlAHUFACrtlRUl 1D R£T)UC£ CATCH BASIN SIZCS PROvroro KNOCKOUT RCOUIROIE:NTS ARC snu un. LOCATION OF CX1SnNG UTIUIICS SHOWN IS APPROXIUATE: ANO .IIAY NOr 8£ ACCURATE OR AU IWCWSII-£. Ir IS TH£ CONTTUCroR'S RCSP()NSIBIUTY ro FICUJ VERIFY LOCAl1CW OF unuTl£5 PRIOR ro PROC£ITNNG IWIH CONSTRUCTION. YOU 1,tUSr CALL 1-80()-424-5555 NOr LESS THAN TltO FVLL BUSINCSS DA rs 9£FOR£ BEGINMNG £XCA VA TION '1N£RC ANY UNDCRGROUNt) unun£S 1,tAY BE LOCAi'W. FAIi.~ ro 00 SC) COULD 1,tCAN BEARING SVBSrANnAL R£PAJR COSTS. ioNGCOUNTYD.D.E.S. .....,.rn ...... !-""'""'- .W,CS II. SN«l!S. P.(. ,,..,_,, . ..,_ c.,...,rto· c,.,.,..,..,,.,. • Com ... ,..,"°" .._.,...0.10 b b C,2007 TRIA.0 ~SS0CIAl'(SI /r.fil@ :..------ " "' .., 11. "' "' ~ "' 0: c:, ::i; 0: 0 ... Cl) §1 "' c:, "' 0 0: " ,ltl ~ " • • 1 l i z ! i 5! ~ t~: lltl 1211211511,lwo.NE ~-.w~~ 425.B21 .M48 Ull.$213111t ... I00..,.-""6 ... --- ).. ..... ~ ffi ~ 3~ ~ Q::: ~ a.: ... ;~ ::i; i,.;;; ~ I),: i ~ " ~ ;l ,, ... ~ 0 " ! -,-~ ~~ flllX Na' PKO/ECT Ml.NI.GER ~:ciwm~ -«AS.~l'C PIDJOCT blCINW IIEI--S>I/.Q!! -A5'A PR01ECT UNDSCAPE ARc!irrtcr !"WT SUIIMm!L DATE: 2/16/07 SCAlt: aDIII.: 1"•40° TlltcN/A JOB ND STAii!' HOT VAIJD UNLESS SIGNED I.ND DATED 04-257 ..... 6M12 ...... I J •• 'i 11 • • • • SE 1/4, SE 1/4, SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23N., RANGE SE., W.M. tOWPCl#T ,111. dtUI LOW l'CINT ~ • 1*15.IO ~ i;: ~ ; z:::.·: ' w ~ • 4-60 I , a I• ~ I ; _,--------o- !:l • ;. ,,' L-- 460 ~~ --~ 4 ~ k ' _\,.. / ./ . \ --,.oos: n ! ""~~ ------I \ ...... I .... -./ -I -----,---:::-.---1 I -ss·-1W e.:::--., ----~- 450 I DI ------I...--::v1..- ra 19 .,;:.IZ..,. ~ I ----~--_..:-=-- • -i------11 1£<15.11~--.. -K' --< ---20·-,r ,_, ...... --' _ .... 1---m •""'tll ----r--L~ ._. ... -r 7su:, _t~-I _ _ ,rjr "52.u ,•,co; , I ,n -"· £:'I -,,· ,c <15 -• #Cllfmo I Jl)P45..11H -. w/.~ u:, ,r,c«au ~ 11 """:.1 1:1·,cisdn (co,,..,, I (SC£ sc ,~ "' ~.,. 1(111F'Yt 1EJ 1r,c'"1.'•1 I .J,·-• Cl#l8 ,c,cr r.;: ii" 8 ID" <151.IO '-«l'-1:r • s.; ~ $--1. ~-""" 11"/C«a. ,r ,c ua,, (SEE ,a,c ' . ·-• • ~ 440 -l'(IICI ,r l W .-c 1 . .5t ~ e ,-, 1r IC AfD<I oT .... '::-c I. (IN-,.,J .n ~ (SalnCNIDJ~~) ~-IC I. ~t-wJ ."!'" '"="" _ -55"•11" • • :5S' ~,r/1. i-;_ T1 -c) ~*;:1:i JV~ rr,m I" IC U (W-S) (WI.I'] CU1iS *UT 12: '!...::~50 IY/£444•1 fDP4.!!UO '1/-PNJ 11." /TOOIWG POND Pl.AN) ;~. ~~ ro w,, GAl«HJ 2:" ~. -----,, .Ul.fJ ~ ,....._ V I\ I rmJ""auc: V' \I/ ' ' ', ' .. .. .. .. 1+00 2+00 J+OO ROAD A lillN()R Arx:t:ss 2' IIPH 1 PROFILE SCALE 1 11 • #1' HORIZONTA. ,I·~ 4' \.O?IICAL 4+00 450 440 ·s+oo ' •IWOl,U" ~-! LOll'PONT lEV• «'.111:5 JO LO'lf,,~T TA • i+JHII • ••• :50 /l"Mlll •'46..511 PWQ£V•4S50 ,a. ·..-: 100.oa"O'I: .. I · i . ' ' L ---~ j ' , ' ~ II I . I -J : , r ,,-/' ---r::-. .::.::~ O r --,s, .. ~ / V -----. :. 'SO •• ----,,~p< ---'-JI ~ f, /... ..,,, ..,_; -~1 .,,-.< ,:;;,-----I T/£f5L (l / .-, ....--;•9'.,,-;.,;::., ,:;::',. l,l IT T/£"5!. (I / _,_.-..--g..!:-:::::-~.-""·:a • I r IE f5J.Jo" ., I _,_.-_,_.:::::;.~~--,z•E.u9.u I 0 .I. _,_-;;,.-.-zr-,~-• ~l-e-:O-/-JIHH'----1 II ~ F:: ,;----I~-~..;,. smrx. I ~"'J II L-!!:.~---__ f:t 11 -------j. ---1-E!-'£:.~--------- 0 -L!l ,.,. . ....,.;a ur; 4.a.z-I~ .uu, ....c ,z· :,:•9.:° . ·- ,o· IE .uo.,. fr i£ ~~ !t b.x, , -,,r ~ ~ -','r-:':l:., .... i3'"1i ~ ':' "' ('SE£ RQIO A l'WUUJ -· ••· -- ... 40 W !'ii PfKPS£rJ r w) ~ '"' ,g w 1£ ,.., f5' r, ~ _. ~ 44"6:Z ro-~ • ,•j,(C) ••1.0~ /'IIA~ '.J r .,.,, ,. IE• ., =-~• IZ 1£"42.U ~ij b.) • ' ,-"' t'{!;!f-:;::c>fS ,r 1z·a•1•u:11 ........ _, .. ll) UC CB I{} THJ -- ;;!:'u2.111(l CJ WI~ :~::: ::gn r":$) ~ ~'V' \ I ~na.cii o I ~ ; ' • ' i . . ...... ------J+OO 1+00 2+00 SE 125TH STREET SV8Aca5S 25 IIPH PROFILE SCALE I ,. 40 HORIZONTAL 1• .. 4' ~11CAL """" LOCArlON OF £)(!STING UTII..IT1£S SHOWN IS APPROXIIIAT'f: ANO /IAY NOT BC ACCURA'ff: OR ALL INCI.USI!.£. IT IS 1HC CONTfMCTOR'S RCSPONSIBIUTY TO flCLO ',,£RIFY LOCATION OF UTIUTICS PRIOR 1D PROaUJINC Nl1H CONSTRUCTION. YOU /IUST CALL 1-800-424-5555 NOT LCSS THAN 11K) F'UU. BU~SS DAYS B€rORE 8€GINNING CXCAVAm::w IIIH£R£ ANY UN()CRCRCIUND UTIUTICS IIAY BC LOCATED. FAJI..IJM TO DO SO C0UW IIEAN 8£:IIRING SUBSTANTIAL RCPAJR COS1S. KING COUNTY D.D.E.S. ......... ....... J.0.111;5 II. SANDEIIS. P.E.. 0£-.e.()PY[NT [N(l!N[Efl -·· -~--· ... --- Q200J Tl!IAD ASsoCIATEsl Lr.fil(M? 121121lMPIAn.N:E ...-.WA"""3H11211 ...... _ <20.1121.34f11ax sa,ulll.OT561o1- L ,o,l Dt,elopm•" Con so liao1, ti :::! I ~ ~ ~ 't ~ i Cl) S! 't Q ~ " ,ltl Si ~ • " i I • '. ! • !if ).. ..... ~ ffi f Q; ;o ~~ .. ;~ ~ i,..; ~ a: ~ ~ " " ;!; I ~ "' i i ic i§ i~ ~•"" ~ B~~ ~~ di.ill1ti rmr SLlllllfflL 11111: Z/16/07 SCUI: 11111.,l"•<O" nn:1·-·· STJIII' 11n' ,.u.m IJIQ.ISS SICIID ll!I tllD .... 04-257 ....... 6 .. 11 Permit Application Report -ow, King County, Washington • Page I of I t,i King County llllEm:m m 4llhi44M 13-init,14.\ti ~ Department of Qevelopment and Environmental Services ~ DD ES Homepage Online Permit Applications Report 3 Search Results for File No: 105p0019 Reported through: June 17, 2007 A/P/D No Permit Type Urban Project A 1• d Rural Title/Description PP ie Status Applicant A05PM2(l0 LUSD URBAN 13 LOT PLAT 07/14/2005 COMPLETE CAMWEST DEVELOPMENT, INC. L05P001.9. PRE-PLAT URBAN MARTIN PLAT 09/28/2005 PENDEXAM CAMWEST DEVELOPMENT, INC. L07SR015 SITEREVP URBAN MARTIN PLAT 03/20/2007 REVIEWED CAMWEST DEVELOPMENT, INC. List Date: June 21, 2007 King County DOES I New ARRlication Search I News I Services I Comments I Search Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. Irie_d~e_t~Hs., http://apps01.metrokc.gov/www6/ddes/scripts/permlist.cfm 6/21/2007 t® • King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 Permit Number: -=LO:c:5::.P.:::0.::.01.:..:9:.__ _____ _ Permit Name: Martin Property FOR INDIVIDUALS: Web date: 09/09/2005 :9,,~B!lflyf'T~QN ()F APPLICANT STATUS For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. z:v -=¥-v65Zer;; Activity Number: ~L0~7~S-'-R""0-'-15c.___ ____ _.:_I __ _ I, (print name), hereby certify that I am the/an owner of the property which is the subject of this permit. If I am not the sole owner of the property, I certify that I am authorized to represent all other owners of the property. My mailing address is: I further certify that I am the "Applicant" for this permit and as such am financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. I shall remain the "Applicant" for the duration of this permit unless I transfer my "applicant" status in writing on a form provided by DDES. * Signature of Applicant Date Signed -OR- FOR CORPORATIONS/BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS: I, S AtA SUJT~ (print name), hereby certify that I am an authorized agent of CArYJ~ Df;.YSl..DteM~ /NL , a corporation or other business association authorized to do business in the Staeofashington, which is the sole owner of the property that is the subject of this permit. If this corporation or business association is not the sole owner of the property, I certify that this corporation/business association is authorized to represent all other owners of the property. The mailing address of this corporation/business association is: 9720 NE 120th Place Suite 100 Kirkland WA 98034 I further certify that the above named corporation/business association is the "Applicant" for this permit and as such is financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. This corporation/business association shall remain the "Applicant" for the duration of this permit unless it transfers its applicant status in writing on a form provided by DDES. ~~~~--b-Jl-o? ~~-~nt Date Signed * * By signing as the Applicant or the Applicant's Agent, I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the information provided above is true and correct. CertApp1icantStatus martin lc-cer-apstat.pdf 09/09/2005 Page 1 of 2 • • NbTICE TO APPLICANTS: By law, this department returns all engineering and other plans to the applicant. If, however, you wish to authorize the department to return engineering and other plans directly to the engineer, architect, or other consultant for the limited purpose of making corrections, please designate below: IZI I authorize this department to return plans directly to my consultant(s) for the limited purpose of making corrections as designated on this form. CONSULTANTS: Triad Associates-Attention Rebecca Cushman 12112 115111 Ave NE Kirkland, WA 98034 Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes CertApplicantStatus martin lc-cer-apstat.pdf 09/09/2005 Page 2 of 2 • • Date: July 2, 2007 To: Jim Sanders King County DDES 900 Oaksdale Ave #MS1B Renton, WA 98055-1219 Job No: 04-257 Project: Martin Property-King County Project L05P0019 Request for Variance Enclosed are: C8l Prints C8l Copies 0 Reproducibles 0Reports 0Documents D Specifications 0 Other 3 6/19/07 1 3 6/29/07 1 6/26/07 3 3 6/17/07 3 4/3/07 3 6/29/07 Remarks: Jim, These have been sent; 0 For Your Use C8l For Your Review I Apprava/ 0 For Your Signature I Return D At Your Request [81 For Your Records [81 For Your lnforma/Jon OotJrer Triad Cover Letter to Jim Sanden from Rebecca Cushman KC-DDES Road Variance Submittal Checklist One Original Signed Road Variance and Two Copies Certificate of Aplicant Status (Sara Slatten ofCamwest) I III 7 Copies -Road Plans. sheets 6 and 11 of 12 Online Permit Applications Report Hearing Examiner's Conditions Road, Storm Drainage Plans. sheets 1-12 (Triad) 12112 !15th Avenue NE Kirkland, WA 98034-6929 425,821.8448 425821.3481 rax 800.488.0756 toll free www.madassoc.com Here is the information requested per your Road Variance Checklist for the Martin Property, for your review. Hyou have any questions, please contact Rebecca Cushman, the Project Engineer, in our office (425-821-8448). Thank you. SentBy: ~~...L..;;....;..~~-X...L...L=..'1¥;;;.x;___ Copies To: Camwest (w/encl) LeeAnn Fraser Land Development Consultants • • . ------------. . . . ® King County Department of DeveJopment and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division • 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Drop-Off Cover Sheet for Land Use Services Division **************************** IMPORT ANT *************************** PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME IS NECESSARY FOR ALL DROP-OFFS l vs Pt!!>D/°, Date Received by LUSD l?J~[;~ll~~rR\ JUL O 2 2007 [Y K.C. D.D.E.S. ORMATION REQUESTED BY KING COUNTY STAFF (please print) Lot Line Adjustment Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off Right of Way Permit Please specify itern(s) clroppecl-off Clearing/ Gradinq Permit -Adrl1t1011al 1nfrn111at1011 requested Please specif; ite..rs1 dropped-of!_ {), · J; /r0 ( ,ef,02 (L'_,a~-~~ -;:)_ ---___ _fi5~ --~ --~-a,__] -- Other: _________ -----------------~==-"'--"-: -------· ···----------------------------- PLEASE NOTE: /\II drop-oil it8rn(s) will be lc,g~Jed i11\o tho computer under the prnjecl nurnber, therefore, it is i111po1icml lhat the top portion of this for111 1s completed properly before you drop-off anything. Assis lance in finding a project number can be provided by speakin9 tc1 a Zon111g/Land Use Tcchr1ician. YoLn cooperation is important. Thrn1k you. Check out the DOES Web site at www.metro/(C~']QVlddes lo-cv:~-clrnpofl pdi A05PM260 2002 PHOTO S-T-R ,\ ,' QSUNES ~SEClltES '/\/1WP1JtES N SlnN!la Aerial PllCa -2002 N Clly 9widal1es Ol8I 0 100 200 Feet 1 .. 20011111 ®King County :~!.i; r '-~~.~~~":=::.:.~=': dwve--~°"""I'-.... --"'--"'in'flOd.•to .. .....-cy,.,.....,__.,rfllllltob-al ::...--:-.::..~:-:.:::..,,. ...... ~. but natlmlld lo, ... MWnUN«lolt ::.-::...~ .. ~.:.n::;.,ir::=., ............. ~-t,y--al Ooutty. Plot dlle: Ju 30, 2005; \lddel001"'°1'GII\IIY_~. H20 Complaints N T<Mnllllpl.NI S.T-R 1\ 'QSUl'ES %v. SEQJl'ES l'\/TWPUtES N Stnm W*1:Bodlel D WI.RO~ Coml)lalnla CJ Partell N Cly Bclln:lal1el Olea 0 500 1000 felt ,-.1oooi. ®~County ~§ z=::..-::::=::.=.~=i: dwqe--~Oounly-no ..,.w--or--or.......,•1o,,_ -·------"'""'*"',,__., --~Oounly-... bo-lor~ --...-.--.«---~iu ... ,_.,,...,,__.,..., pa._,,_ .. _.,_., .. _ -... ";.::.. ..,,,,_., ......... --='"""· -..i,y-~ot Plol dale: Nov 29, 2006; l'ddel0011>d>l~-~apl" ! a: w "' '- :) z w -' ... w C 0 u 0 w .., a: w "' I: :, z .... u w - King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesd;ile Al'{'nue Soutin\'est Ren 1011, \\',\ 98055·1219 MEMORANDUM FROM: Site Investigator_ P,ETH CH_ESH I EJs. TO: Engineer 'P ~TE DYE ( Lf:t EN J RE: field Check Observations I. PROJECT NUMBER/ NAME LOSPOOl9 / MA!<..TI1'l l Address I Location i 2L.\39 IYBJJ:t A\JE $£ Date \ \ · 3 · 5 FtEL-D ~ 11· 'Z· 5 Related Project#, Name _,_AJCo""'-'5=.!P-Lt'.)..L-'2_.(""""o""--------------- Thomas Map Page (new) (o 5{a ,I\ Thomas Guide Page (old) _______ _ 1.. SYNOPSIS OF PROPOSA~ S\.SDl\/.lDE 3,log ACJ<ES OF R-Y I l\Jf o IY LOTS WA:TER QUALi I Y BASIC. L H: D6._ _________ _r__ _______ _ FLoW CONTROL 3. SIERRA FILE INFORMATION Parcel#(s) 102305 9?.?8'3 Kroll Map fuS E Acres / Feet2 3 . CoC\ A * Community Plan NEW CASTLE S-T-R $ \:;: 10• '23 · () S Current Zoning_~f<~--Y-4----- o Comprehensive Plan _,U"'--'---'l'Y\'-'--------· --------- a: o. Limited Text Entry NO 'P-Svf f IX CC)t-.il)11laJ ~ Fa.JJ,,.l.C) PAGE I 4, SENSITIVE AREAS INFORMATION MAP FOLIO PAGE# SITECQNTAINS SUE ABUTS YES NO YES NO COMMENTS • Wetlands ___ [ZJ D D [21 Wetland# _____ Wetland Class ____ Drainage Basin -------- Sub Basin LOWER CEDAR . f? 1\/EJ< Critical Basin? I] 0 • Streams ______ o IZJ D [21 Stream Class _____ Stream Name ---------------- • I 00-year Floodplain _0 [2l ___ 0 [ZJ • Erosion Hazard __ 0 [21 _____ 0 ~ • Landslide Hazard _0 C2J __ 0 0 • Seismic Hazard ____ 0 [Z) ___ 0 [2j • Coal Mine Hazard _0 [21 ____ 0 [2l • Other known SA's _o D ~D D Class I or 2 Stream or Class I Wetland within one mile downstream of project site1 _____ _ FEMA FIRM number· ________________ In FEMA Floodplain? I] ffiJ Soils Mapped · ' A:j,, A 5G Map # _,_,!;5'""---- Best available Topographical Map VSG:i S :# '2 S S. SITE DESCRIPTION MATCHES T.I.R. DESCRIPTION/ UIE StTE" \ S A R~C..TM!6UlAJ<. ~tth:PED PARCEL w111-1 A '$MAL-L sn,e 0(2 "PtsN ttfs:NDLE" l~)([ENDINq avr "JP Tl:::IE. EA-ST. TBEPE Is "A:N \?')(\STINfu \WUSS AND Bf<:12.N I OUIBµI L-DI t...16 3 $\,£-RQU/\JOta) BY ACD\J S PASN l?-E ) (Ho5T LY 60,.e.(rs) w rrll SB/ff.AL LJ'Sgb S :IJ2.E::"E'S AND C.Rt2S:S ::Qt(; S11]Z : som t; CCN17\1 ts..1. I 1'.X1 BC2l @A:LDG\2 . A Sr--'IALL W~D MEA IS I OEtStTlnED Dtv "11-tS: S1:n;: nLiP, tv1uct:J of :-:o±1s APOQ\QS =::t:7') 111\\?E, '.B~ . DsweB.roj6t'.t\\l6) m 6Y C.ol03T'eucst),O(\,J OF &N M/Ad:Vr ii?LA:I -n-tE. Q.8):1Alt,JOl?e-\$ 1 N '11-\-S ~A"ST].lg.f; WD IS C.,ur2,r2:0JIJ;( A::CCE:,,2(1) (?;'( A b r2AvBl, Qb/u) wren-+ 6f: THE Si~. PAGE 2 6. EXISTING SITE FEATURES Unmapped Sensitive Areas: --"N,..C»-ucs.1.)..i;;E;;,_,'5...u;£B}J...1:-..--..i::::.1 _______________ _ Soils types seen and evidence of soil movement. slides, slumps, erosion, or deposition: ------ t0D SOIL I-"\ Q/8):1/:aJT SESN Existing Utilities (hydrants, signs, poles, etc.) shown on site plan/__,Y'--'F"'-S«---------- Wildlife and habitats: __,6....._Q"""'-'A--'-'~'-s=--------------------- Water Wells: NQ-.IE S£BN · WCBUIU)/1,,;,(,:;j';;, OQS.J'Ti::: Work started on site/ · WO, SU2-R,DUN\)@ BY Sl:t7cMi<D::X'.,_ CCN'$1]2.U:::..,1'0W. Closed depression >5000foet2 1 IIJ @ Steep slopes? IIJ Iii·------------ 7,· DRAINAGE Drainage complaint records ?>EE. kTT7ta-tED qt'.::, -60CS I t0"ID gt::IJTI)kj Proposal will add >5000fc2 of new impervious surface/ [rJ [ID Approximate Area ______ _ Proposal will collect and concentrate surface and storm water runoff from an upland and site drainage area of over 5000 ft'/ IYI [ID Approximate Area ______ _ Upl~nd Draina~e Basin (draining directly onto site): 3 'PAl<ce:1..S {.;,: l Aeei;) F LOU ) 00Tl) T1-f E' 'S 1Tt A2.cM :Di i;:-@ST On-siteDrainage: SLOPES /'\ND DIJLl-1-ES 0!2AJN 1J±S SITE Tb ::n-±E: W\?'ST BDL.N Dl\}2.}:( \ ..J "1B ( lt:,.ICL,..u[)I µh /:\ Downstream Drainage (minimum 1/4 mile distance): :::r:B:E: StTh D\2-l<;J JvS 'TD ~~ Dl2.tn~ bUlkt" W ~-;;_ 'Tl-1-S-PLA-r OF ( ® ie co.u~'D2o D · A:ND PL.ows , UU) '11:::\:C D~T\Ot-,,) ?'Act i:tI':C FPK'. Stt2U::H<-CC'L.. Ttt:S 'Dt?T J?oµD o~s. SOI.JD:\ l)IYDE'l2-5£ 125TH '$I :n:2 A 'DtTI--H 'i2£rtJivQ A ?;>F 1:mu.sr::::. tWTO A '$ff£" ' SQ.;JQt OE . D±F: t\-D.,)s.J; "JJ:i1\"r::: 1 s N~L>< . b MOIW &ND h?0D£-'> <ro '.BIZ uu;ee._ D@fwt.d? lafl:1@..JT"", fJ2-LJt:1 ~ 11:\:~ QQ,t\)i.Jkl:a,14 fl_o,.µS Sol)ll-\: ::n:t,2-0l.h H-Nt;?W8)2.. G•'f'( OF'" 12.~ pj2..oll:Z,"t':, f'6 0 ~t!SW lt..J n..\ t, 11 I:'.-. Drainage Description Matches T.I.R.? -1..,<!e;>::;...------------------ PAGE 3 8. EXISTING ROAD NETWORK On-site Roads __ :i)=c\2"'-\\J..,,_,,B-u="--/N.!.....1 __________________ _ Adjacent Roads 6 f2.&J EL \?ct;'[) A l.oN eJ NOl2JJ::\ S \DE -.QO/\j)S fOQ, St::17'.rt0£<.0:X:, IN M?.SA -WOT Bull ... T uP ID St:rE 'RctsO \5".Sl>fz> ON SM:MlZOcY. ~OT i:2.E:SDLVBD Closest Transit Stop----'---------------------- 8. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT IMPACTS ON SOIL AND WATER II. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS SlTE. PAGE 4 10 CONSTRUCTION SIGNS WITHIN SOO FEET AND ADJACENT USE 11 NUMBER OF PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN PA GE 5 ATTACHMENT TO MEMORANDUM PROJECT NUMBER: FIELD/OFFICE SKETCH WORK: Drainage systems, features, channels within the upland site plan areas, on the development site, and in the downstream receiving areas: SKETCHED BY: SC ALE Notes:----------------------------- I"= ___ _ 0 PA GE 6 .)eaek.§top Tuesday, Nov 01, 2005 02:22 PM Tuesday, Nov 01, 2005 02:23 PM Tuesday, Nov 01, 2005 02:23 PM Parcel Number: 1023059383 Taxpayer: MARTIN KENNETH A Annexation: N/A Jurisdiction: Unincorporated King County Situs Address: 12439 148TH AVE SE Postal City: Renton, 98059 Plat Name: ; Rec: nil Lot: N/A; Block: NIA Kroll Page: 805 E Thomas Bros. Page: 656 1/4-S-T-R: SE-10-23-5 Acres: 3.69 (160736 SqFt.) Current Zoning: R-4 Potential Zoning: Comp. Plan Land Use: um Assessors Open Space: NIA Commercial Use: N/A Number of Units: N/A Mobile Home: N Appraised Land Value: 140000 (2004), 415000 (2005) Appraised Improvements Value: 217000 (2004), 165000 (2005) Community Plan Area: Newcastle Unincorporated Area Council: Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council School District: Issaquah School District 411 Fire District: 0025 Roads MPS Zone: 442 ($2918.00) Roads TCM Zone: 754 Waterfront: Water Service: Water Service Planning Area: King County Water District 90 Sewer Service: Airport Noise Remedy Program: N/A Bald Eagle Flag: NIA Council District (1996-2001): 12 David Irons Jr. (R) Council District (2002): 12 David Irons Drainage Basin: Lower Cedar River, WRIA 8 Police: King County, Pct: 3, Dist: F2 Service/Finance Strategy Area: Service Planning Snowload Zone: Standard Agricultural Production District: N Forest Production District: N Rural Forest Focus Area: N TDR Type: NIA TDR Status: NIA TDR Permit Number: NIA Building Inspection Area: N-7 Clearing Inspection Area: Bruce Engell Code Enforcement Inspection Area: Bill Turner ESA Inspection Area: Greg Sutton Grading Inspection Area: Bruce Engell Land Use Inspection Area: Tim Cheatum Sens. Areas Notice(s) on Title: NONE Aquatic Areas Buffer: N Basin Condition: Low Flow Control Area: Conservation Flow Water Quality: Basic Critical Aquifer Recharge Area: None Area of Potential Wetland Influence: Y ~--------------------------------------------- SOC Page I of 3 ® King County ll.lmlll lllm!ml lh§fi/14¥ Mdiik4,M By law this information may not be used for commercial purposes. Taxpayer MARTIN KENNETH A Parcel Number 1023059383 Account Number 102305938304 --------------------------Tax Year 2004 Tax Status TAXABLE Appraised Land Value Appraised Improvement Value Code 6867 Taxable Value Reason $140,000 Taxable Land Value NONE OR UNKNOWN $140,000 $217,000 Taxable Improvement Value $217,000 Parcel Number 1023059383 Taxpayer MARTIN KENNETH A Account Number 102305938304 -------------------------- Tax Year 2005 Tax Status TAXABLE Appraised Land Value Appraised Improvement Value Code 6867 Taxable Value Reason $415,000 Taxable Land Value NONE OR UNKNOWN $415,000 $165,000 Taxable Improvement Value $165,000 Assessor Property Sales Records: Tip: Use the Recorders Office: Excise Tax Affi.davits Regort to see more sales records details Sale Date 3/7/1986 Sale Price $0 Seller Name MARTIN KENNETH A $ER Buyer Name MARTIN KENNETH A Assessor Parcel Records: District Name KING COUNTY Property Name Plat Name Plat Block Plat Lot Lot Area 160,736 SqFt (3.69 acres) Section/Township/Range SE 10 23 5 Property RESIDENTIAL Type Present Single Family Use (Res Use/Zone) Water WATER System DISTRICT Sewer PRIVATE System Access PUBLIC Street PAVED Surface soc;; Page 2 of3 Assessor Legal Description Records: Account Number 102305938304 I Record Number lo1 Legal Description 102305 383 S 1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 LESS N 16 FT LESS E 150 FT LY S OF N 14 FT THOF LESS CO RD Assessor Residential Building Records: Address 12439 148TH AV SE 98059 Building Grade Average Building number 1 Condition Good Bedrooms 3 Year Built 1969 Baths 2 Year Renovated 0 1/2 Baths 1 Total Living SqFt 2360 3/4 Baths 0 1st Floor Sq Ft 2360 Stories 1 Half Floor SqFt 0 Single Story Fireplace 1 2nd Floor SqFt 0 Multi Story Fireplace 0 Upper Floor Sq Ft 0 Free Standing 0 Fireplace Total Basement SqFt 0 Basement Garage SqFt 0 Total Finished Basement 0 Attached Garage SqFt 440 SqFt Finished Basement Grade NONE OR Open Porch SqFt 0 UNKNOWN Daylight Basement Enclosed Porch SqFt 0 Heat System Elec BB Deck SqFt 0 Heat Source Electricity Percent Brick Stone 0 This report was generated: 7/30/2005 10:13:59 AM Related on-line reports: [King County-GIS:_P~op~y_informatioJLEAQ----------·-•. ----·----_J [!slrui CC>_unty Ass':'s~_or: S.u~mit_a re_gy_e_st to correc.t this information _ I !ggEs: Permit Am1lic;_ations Re11ort ] l!Sl!)~· ~ci~nty. i:iistri~l~-~nd D~vel~·r;;;;~~t Conditio~s Reiiort .... . ... . ] I King County Assessor: eReal Prop~ ReQort {PDF format requires Acrobat) j ~:o~d:~~:~eas~:!;::o~~::;.~:::-·lnformatio~·-·······.···· ·-·-· · ·· .. ·,~--··_··-=,·1 1··~-~~o;ci~rs6itice: •• _.sc~11_11~ci i~~gi~--of Rlats, s~-~!lxs_,~n§(,iii~r-~~p~()~~rri~6t~ ] Enter a 10 digit Parcel Number: I __J :=========::::_ ___ ___, or Enter an address: L.---·-·· .... ---·---····-.) ·--------------------·-------~ soc;: Page 3 of3 King CountY. I GIS Center I News I Services I Comments I Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. Ibe detajj§.,_ soc; Page I of I (® King County IIEl!l'.ll.al lllllEm!l!llll ll-1•ikiid4¥ Comments M5¥fk3,M No P-Suffix Conditions Found The Parcel Number you entered "1023059383" does not have any Development Conditions. To start over click on the New Query link below. Updated: December 29, 1998 King County I DOES PaQsl I DDES/GIS Page I New Query I News I Services I Comments I Search Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, y6u expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. Th~d_Qiails. --------- Document Title(s) (op'ttansiictior1i'coniained th;~in/tlllf;.,.... applicable to your document mu,t be filled in) ·•:.,, .. ,. .. ·•' : ,. ·' ., ..... I. 3. -D12.A1~1;-.. ~E4"~':+ +_.,-.. ---··----,-_------- Reference Number(s) ofDocujnen*1i ~ign.id.~r reJellsedi:: ··· ... ,;: :: ·: .,· / .... ·,·. :· Additional reference #'s on page __ ~f d<i~um<!ht : . ···-;, .. /' •' Grantor(~) · CL"'!! name, first name, initi~) '\ 1. C,AIRNr:--S·Q)NSU2,IU10~,u L. \ / 2. .. .,. _-·---"---.c---"----+--='-----'---,l'--.,> s AddUiota1 n~e;'~n paie __ of document. J\~ditional nrum;,:·~~.:1age/',···'\ of document. ,•'' ,,,,w,,·,, • Legal descripti9n (,ibbr<;<iiate{ J:{ lot, blo~k, plat or section, township, range) L0"J: &S OF ~~ I A'(~w 711€ fw,,f 11£@µ,tf/) VN~INf, WV , l:iit-·· ./I--,'-,:..--~ fZPt.D ~ /(:.11\)6 C.DlltJ7Y, WA. ·:;. .,. ,• .,.. '':·,./ ,. .. Additional legal is on page _j, of di:>cur;nent. . ':, .... ,'•' Assessor's Property Tax Pah~I/Ac;eb~!i't N.J~b.li'r assigned ... ,,., _,. .,·· :; ,· 110820 03SO -· .. .:: D Assessor Tax # not yet f:.,,,w'•',, The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the infonnatiordlto)lided.6n the fo,;m. Tl:ie sta!l:~ill not read the document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing inf~tio.1:1 provlded b~reio:· :: · .. .. ·: ;: . I am requesting an emergency nonstandard recording'for an_.iddifional fee' l!~ pro:v.ided in RCW 36.18.010. I understand that the recording processing requtt~JtJCnts.'inaYcover up/ir otherWise. obscure some part of the text of the original document. ·.,. .. · · .. · · ·· · ______________________ .Signatllre ~fil~~;~~ting.Pirty fei I ' ~' ,, ... __ .. ,, ... ,;: .~~} After Recordilig retu111,t'6: / ',•. ,,• .. ,.,?· ;:.:,,:/' ._,;·,·.,-;_ King County Real Estafo Sc;tvices' 500 4th Avenue, Room'SO~A ,· Seattle, WA 98104 . ..... ,.,:, .,··",.,(/'., ... ,\ ...... ,/f .,., ..... ,,,. DRAINAGE EASl!JME,NT .,, \ ~6r a '<lllual,1\l consideration, receipt of;hicn'i~·~;e~¥G~?;:ied)h~·6JNTOR, .::' ./ ··::. ::. ·::: ....... :/ -i .,·····"'\ .,,· / .. :· Caimes Constru~tion; LLC, the owner(s) in fee of that certain p(lrceiofland/describbd as :· ,.:· . ·: '':, •' ,, .:· foHi:i:s: "\,,. Lot 35 ofShamrock''Heights I according to the plat recorded under rec~fding number ·:. ,· ..... ·.' :. ,::' . ...... ~0051°122000044·;~<:ords of King County, Washington. ' .. •' . . . hereby grant ancfconvey a,ri~ri-e~6I~;ve fuseriiont over that portion of Lot 35 legally described in exhibit "A" an~,-depi~;ed .. on J~J:µbit·;;~'':•both ~f)'vhlc;h are attached hereto and incorporated ,• ., .... ·,.,, •' ..... ' ,, :·: herein, to King County, a politi\;itl ~iyisiori of the State ot),y~hington, (GRANTEE) for the ........ .:" ;: .-:' .:= .:· .:.,' ·::._ purpose of conveying, storing, m~ing ·lliid fapilitating s!IJrm ijnd s!l,rface water per an engineering pian approved by 1(1hg c~un'ty f6r ~ projei;ts k\town as: ,, ' . ·• ,• ' . ,, .,·····"',•,, .... Shamrock Heights I: King County File No: L02P0014 lfud f6r th~ even!Ulll benefit 6fthe Martin Property, King County File No: L05P0019, toge~er ~th the' rjgi; for ~\ng/C6~fy ~<l . ,, ,. ,. ,• (' .: ::,.·· •' reasonably ingress and egress to enter said drainage easement ':tbr'' th~ plirpos.tofJnspecting, Pti 2. •,:,.,,,,.~,·'' ·-······· .. / .' ... /<::/ !; ,i•'".i .... \ .{_ ·:,. . .:../ .? . //:/·: . ....,/ .,· ,./ ./ ·:).. . operating, mllµltaining/i:epairi~ ~~ impfq;virig.¢'e drainage facilities contained herein. In the ··.,,,:,,, .. ,. .. , .. / :"·:·· ./' .:··:: . /" .,.<:''·:::,,,··· . event the Grantee perfqtms Jmy 'efork,J1t' the easement area, Shamrock Heights Homeowners . i . -~ Association shall repl~~6;' ~t its. cqs( ~y J~ds;;;;~., or 01:1:i/ftnprovements damaged or destroyed as a result of such actl~i!jJ: th!t :((i~lcoifuiido~ ndt;;p~r or replace. .. . :. ' ·-. ....... ·"°' ..... ., The oRANtoi of said parcel is requ;;~ tdobkiri})tjor,litt;n 4;;;:;;l'trom ~twater and .-< '':.\_ ·.:-.. :.... ,,,,,· /:' ... / '';,,./ "''\ \: .,/' /; Land R~sources Pivision of the King County'"Depaftmi,iit .or"Na'tural Resc:>\Jrc~s prior to :·· ./'".:;. \ {.. / f , ... -.. ,·.·:, .t ./ ./ perfof)hing any, al~rations or modifications to the dnii~e ~jlities/(~<leriround pipe) contiined within said drainage easement. _,. ;' .. ,: --". ......... -.:~· Th,is'baseirient is intcinded to facilitate reasonable access to th~'\iriiimme facilities. It is ' .. . •', ,.;" bi~ding upon)li~ 6RA:N;6R, f ts h\:irs, successors and assigns . . ,, ..... ,.~····· ' / ·-t ,,' •', GRANTOR ASSOCIATION SHAMROCK-14.EIGJITS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION -·-" . .. .. ' ,, ·.. .. By: .~ .. ,,, .. . ..... ,., \· , ... ,// ST A TE OF WASl:ID{C,TQN )/ COUNTY OF KING Jss. / / On this day person~ly a~e~ b.efor¢ ~{ ..-... Andy Cairnes, known to me to be"ih~inru:i,giir o{~airiie~ ci~:~ction, LLC, described in and who execut~d the within and foregoing' in~ent RQ,d ackn~wl~ged'iliat·h\) signed H~e same as the free anf~oh1ntary act and deed of said party fo/tii~ 11se~ and'0purp9ses,the~in stl)t~d/ 5'i~e~,~~:>fY hand and official seal~;~· d3~'~;i/of%i;:~{sf i/':i// , 2006. •., .. , •. ., ... ,,··· ·:,, ..... ~:: •.. ,, ,;-:· \ .... ~~dforthe State of Washington, residing at Jt,1'-K-fM/01 wA )My,Commission Expires: 2 -2S::-01{ On this day persdnajfy ap(iaredb~fore Ai~: ..-···, • ' Eric H. Campbell, known to irie ~ li.e° du{·~~si\if~t,' of the,tS~ock Heights Homeowners Association, described in and wh<( elleci,jted /the *ifuin'. lljid foregoing instrument and acknowled~e9. that he signed the same as·ihe iree;\m4.'loluntiuy -~ct Jui.ct'°deed,of said pai;t:y for the uses and p,11rp6~ therein stated. , . · ,, , .. · '• ... ,. .. · .. ./ ./ ,ffive~~d:ifyhand and official seal ~~·~(~d~y-of·~-~f¥-•• /' , 2006. )MyComrnissionExpires: :J-~s-oe, ,:· ,, .... ,,,.,·· ,.,,,.,,."'r'· i .. •'·{···· ' iss0 ·o· 2"vi' > \> .,· i i o•w 'B' ,, -~4' '" sie.o± SO~ .. FT . .. ,,..,, .. · N 9~34"W 0 ~ ·,. .· ,,.; . .. , ;· _'.;;,' /:. ::)t . /1;}~! ·~. :· /1.;,·~; ; : 0:'"\~tfl ... : ·,!;\'! ,,:::;ti ,'~i~:i •/Xttf~ "; t~~ :i}'.{?t' .. riutr/: ''! .. • ' .. ,:.,··,;, .•.. , ..-.1',i;IAMR()9~')-!EIGl-iTS L..,. n;r:>.:i.>:· · :L.Ei,,AL: o.E§cR1~·ri.9N·. .· .EXHIBITA· TRIAD JOB# 01-159 AUGUST. 11, 2006 . ··. . i :LOT:i5 DRAfNAGE EASEMENT ;J:.so~;H,1;:~~ F,EET .6F LO~:i~.~HA~t~ot<. HEIG~~s I ACCORDING TO THE PLAT . THEREOE,RECORD!:D .UNDER RECORD,IN~ )'IUMBE;R 20051122000044, RECORDS OF KING ?OUNJYi'WA,S!i,IN9r0'N .. :./. · . , , ,-•,• / •. ! •• •: wR'.rfrerfsY: · AWG .. >· • CHECKED BY: NAY P(;J 1 , .•• , .... ".I' . .:.~,,/ ···~-··""' .. :: £ .. l - ! Martin Property King County, Washington Level 1 Downstream Analysis Prepared for CamWest Real Estate Development, Inc. Triad Job No. 04-257 LOSPOOI ~ Prepared By: Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis / Prepared For: Cam West Real Estate Development, Inc. Martin Property Level 1 Downstream Analysis King County, Washington Issued: September 18, 2005 Kristen Anderson, E.I.T. Reviewed By: K.C. D.D.E.S. Rebecca Cushman, P.E. LOSPOb/'7 9/18/2005 Job #04-257 /rRJAD ---~·· Page i • •• Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis Table of Contents 1 TASK 1 STUDY AREA DEFINITION & MAPS ................................................... 1 1.1 lntroduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Area ............................................................................................................................ 2 2 TASK 2 RESOURCE REVIEW ........................................................................... 2 2.1 King County Basin Reconnaissance Program ................................................................. 3 2.2 Sensitive Areas Folio .......................................................................................................... 3 2.3 King County Soils Survey ................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) .......................................................... .4 2.5 King County Wetland lnventory ......................................................................................... 5 3 TASK 3 & 4 FIELD INSPECTION & DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND PROBLEM DESCRIPTIONS ............................................................................. 5 3.1 Existing Site Conditions ..... : ............................................................................................... 5 3.2 Onslte Drainage ....................................................................................... : ........................... 6 3.3 Off site Drainage ................................................................................................................... 7 4 TASK 4 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION .................................................. 9 4.1 Downstream Description .................................................................................................... 9 4.2 Downstream Problems ........................................................................................................ 9 5 TASK 5 MITIGATION OF EXISTING OR POTENTIAL PROBLEMS ............... 11 APPENDIX iMAP DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE EXHIBIT ONSITE FEATURES EXHIBITS WESTSIDE OF SITE EASTSIDE OF SITE DRAINAGE BASINS (K.C. BASIN RECONNAISANCE PROGRAM 1987) LOWER CEDAR RIVER BASIN MAP (PRINTED 8-18-05) KING COUNTY COMMUNITY PLANNING AREAS FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP #530071 0350 A (F.E.M.A.) KING COUNTY SOILS SURVEY MAP AND LEGEND REPORT PREPARED BY AES!, INC. (January 27, 2005) TABLE 3.2.2.B OF THE 1998 KCSWDM TOPOZONE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP LOWER CEDAR RIVER TRIBUTARIES OFFSITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE . OFFSITE ANALYSIS -DRAINAGE COMPLAINT MAP DRAINAGE COMPLAINTS TERRASERVER AERIAL IMAGE SENSITIVE AREAS FOLIO MAPS SIENNA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 9/18/2005 ·Job #04-257 Page ii . ·-------I Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis • 1 TASK 1 STUDY AREA DEFINITION & MAPS • • 1. 1 Introduction The project proposes to construct 14 single-family lots on approximately 3.71 acres in King County, Washington. The site, currently referred to as Martin Property, is north of the City of Renton boundary and between 144th Place SE and 148th Avenue SE. Martin property is within Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington. The Vicinity Map below shows the general location of the site. This Level 1 Downstream Analysis describes drainage to and from the site per Tasks 1-5 (Page 2-10 through 2-13) of the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). 9/18/2005 Job #04-257 TO 1-405 -~, / N,t. 4th ST I . ·-I I : /- .. -//. M/1" v,,i.:F'! {.'Oi.JNiY,;JAf<i< _\ fS~-! i?i/ i I I 1 :=..~1 LI ·t1--i 1 \ 1--l- r-,1/?KI' & r,:1()£ 5l:......;_-!_.?nd_:'=:.i_/ ·/ I ' I / / -·· 'J • · • ,:,·.,.·1 .... -,i' ., .... ,,,' .... r' -.'.:. --/-o .<:---i -' Vicinity Map Not to Scale /-rRIAD '""''"' _____ .. Page I • J • • Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis 1.2 Study Area The study area, per Tasks I & 2 (Definition, Maps and Resource Review), will extend up to I mile downstream of the site. A one mile radius from the site is shown on the King County iMAP (printed 6/16/05) available in the Appendix. The site is rectangularly shaped, with a 15' wide 'flagpole' road on the northeastern edge extending approximately 120' eastward to 148 1h Ave NE. The upstream, offsite basin is limited to a small area (less than 0.83 acres) composed of three parcels neighboring the eastern edge (I 023059355, I 023059038, and I 023059341 ). As required, the upstream limit goes far enough to preclude any backwater effects from this pro· ect. Onsite runoff flows southwest as evident by the site's topography. A french drain collects runoff few feet off site of the western site border in the neighboring Shamrock development's tightlined conveyance system. The intercepted drainage is conveyed to the Shamrock detention wetpond and released gradually via the associated control structure. The downstream, offsite analysis extends to the Maplewood Creek beyond 148'h Ave SE and SE 142nd St leading to the Cedar River. An appendicized iMap figure is available to observe the one mile radius limit around site. Per Tasks 3, 4, and 5, the downstream study area is only required to extend to the quarter-mile point located near 148 1h Ave SE and SE 142nd St (as shown on the Existing Conditions Exhibit providing a circle with a Y. mile radius) or a location where the project site area is less than 15% of total tributary drainage area to the quarter-mile point. 2 TASK 2 RESOURCE REVIEW Available maps and information reviewed which are included for the following Resource Review are: Lower Cedar River Basin Map Sensitive Areas Folio Maps FEMA 100-year Flood Plain Map (September 12, 1978) Drainage Complaints on file at King County Records Division King County Community Planning Areas (May 1985) Resources reviewed and listed in the 2005 KCSWDM discussed below include: King County Basin Reconnaissance Program 9/18/2005 Job #04-257 /rRIAD ,,,, -- Page 2 • ------------------------ Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis Sensitive Areas Folio King County Soils Survey FEMA King County Wetlands Inventory Other Offsite Analysis Reports (more specifically, Sienna Level I Downstream Analysis-dated 8/1/200 I and Shamrock Level I Downstream Analysis-dated 1/1/2004. Resources listed in the 2005 KCSWDM which were not reviewed are: Critical Drainage Area Maps Road Drainage Problems Migration River Studies 2. 1 King County Basin Reconnaissance Program According to the King County Basin Reconnaissance Program Summary (Vol. 2), the site is located within the Lower Cedar River Sub-basin of the Cedar River Drainage Basin (see • Basin Maps located in the Appendix). The site is located within the Newcastle Community Planning Area as shown on the appendicized delineation of King County Community Planning Areas. • 2.2 Sensitive Areas Folio Maps from the King County Sensitive Areas Folio (December 1990) show that the site is not in a sensitive area with regard to seismic hazards, coal mine hazards, erosion hazards, wetlands, streams, or I 00-year flood plain. However, a Class IV wetland has been delineated centrally along the western boundary of the site . 911812005 Job #04-257 /rRIAD '·"" "". ---- Page :l ------------·--------------------------~------------ • • • Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis 2.3 King County Soils Survey According to the King County Soils Survey, the majority of the site lies wit soils (AgB and AgC). I I --, __ I \ (' I "\ /\', AgO -- \ I I I '- · AgC I Ag8 \\·,"- 1 ~\ :~ .. l I ah~/ -··/ [v8 ; , ', t·· \ ---::::::... --/-I ' ) Nt 4..'l-,: AVC,\'U{ ..._ --·' ···--·--\ --· -···-"'-'-'-'-' . ---··· . .~·) ··'-·/ APPROX/MA TE SIT[ LOCA TtON {N TS See the appendicized King County Soils Survey Map and Legend. Table 3.2.2.B of the 1998 KCSWDM classifies this type of soil in the SCS Hydrologic Soil Group C and the Till KCRTS Soil Group (available in the appendix). A 'Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report' (January 27, 2005) prepared by Associated Earth and Sciences, Inc. is available for review in the appendix. 2.4 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) According to the appendicized FEMA Map #530071 0350 A (dated September 29, 1978), the site is not located within a 100-year floodplain . 9/18/2005 Job #04-257 /rRIAD . \ .. '" ''"' -·- Page 4 • • • Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis 2.5 King County Wetland Inventory According to the King County Wetlands Inventory Maps there are no wetlands located onsite. However, a small (0.03 acre, approximately) wetland has been observed near the central-western portion of the site. A wetland study will be completed and the wetland area will be marked. Appropriate buffers based on wetland classification will be incorporated into the final design. 3 TASK 3 & 4 FIELD INSPECTION & DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND PROBLEM DESCRIPTIONS The following site description is based upon a field inspection performed on August 241 \ 2005 by Rebecca Cushman, P.E. and Kristen Anderson, E.I.T. (Triad Associates) The weather on August 24th was mildly humid and sunny. The entire site was walked and downstream drainage conditions were examined on that date. Observations are noted in this section. 3. 1 Existing Site Conditions Refer to the Onsite Features Exhibits to aid in the following site description. One single-family home along with an associated driveway, two barns and internal fencing currently exist onsite. Approximately 0.03 acres in the central western edge of the site appears to have some wetland characteristics such as reeds, buttercups, and sedges. During this site visit the 0.03 acre area was dry. It appears to be self-contained and did not have outgoing flows. The wetland characteristics do not appear to extend beyond the property line onto the western neighboring parcel. Most of the existing site terrain is mildly sloped (2-5%) from northeast to southwest. Steeper slopes (8-10%) are on the 15' wide flagpole extension. The highest elevation (480 feet) is at the tip of the flagpole extension adjacent to 148 111 Ave NE. The lowest elevation is at the southwest comer (443 feet). The entire site is pastured with some trees and blackberry overgrowth. Deciduous trees are planted in line with three 9/18/2005 Job #04-257 /TRIAD Page 5 • • Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis shallow channels. Three Evergreen trees (30-40 feet tall) are near the existing onsite structures. existing structures. Much of this site is enclosed by fencing. The 15' wide gravel drive running from 148th Ave toward the western property edge is fenced off from the rest of the site except at the garage entrance driveway. The east, west and south property boundaries are entirely fenced. In addition, onsite fence enclosures exist within the site. One 20 x 20 fence enclosure contains blackberry brambles on the west side of the residence's driveway. A second fence enclosure appears to be used as a corral for livestock and is located in the southeast comer of the site. This corral is offset from the eastern and southern fence line by nearly 10 and20 feet, respectively. 3.2 Onsite Drainage Onsite elevations range from 478 feet to 444 feet. The majority of the site consists of elevations between 444-470 feet. The site elevation in the northeast comer is at elevation 478' at the northern tip of the 15' wide flagpole end (near 148th Ave SE). The slope along . the flagpole access route is nearly 9%. This area is graveled and is used as access to the current onsite residence's driveway. There ar three notable onsite drainage paths hat extend to the western edge of the site. One ditch (labeled 'A' on the Onsite Features Map) is on the west half of the northern edge of the site. This ditch crosses in front of the driveway, through blackberry brambles and through a line of medium-sized deciduous alder trees before reaching the west edge of the site. A second ditch (labeled 'B') extends from an upstream eastern parcel along the entire southern edge of the site also leading drainage to the western edge of the site. This ditch is sporadically lined with blackberry brambles that increase in density toward the west. The southern-edge ditch increases width to nearly four feet as it ventures west. A third ditch (labeled 'C') is located amongst the central path of trees in the western pastur The over ' site has one distinct ons,te drainage basins flowing southw st owards the neighboring Shamrock Development. 9/18/2005 Job #04-257 /TRIAD '" "' I '" • .......---- Page 6 • Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis Other notable onsite features are shown on the Onsite Features Map. This includes a 2' diameter 'home-made drywell' that exists in the small front yard of the residence. It appears to be an empty metal barrel in the ground with a pipe outlet inside receiving drainage from the south. Drainage entering this drywell drains westerly during overflow to ditch A. A second onsite feature is a 10-15' long drainage rock path/french drain runs parallel to both the northern fence line and northern corral fence line (labeled as a 'french drain' on Onsite Features Exhibit). This runoff collection appears to outlet to the east-to-west ditch/swale along the southern property line, however the outlet was not observed 3.3 Offsite Drainage The basin's offsite drainage path is described in the following paragraphs. To assist in , understanding the narrative, please see the Downstream Drainage Exhibits. The only ~ D me~d~ upstream areas draining to the site are from three eastern adjacent properties 0023059355, ""o~~{)aWio23059038, and 1023059341). The offsite flow from this site enters a backyard French • v Ulilli 1 drain system (D, see Downstream Drainage Exhibit) alongside the Shamrock site's eastern 'l'. border. This runoff is incorporated into Shamrock's tightlined storm drainage system and ¥ lS 1 collected in a wet detention pond within Shamrock. The associated control structure releases runoff as required by Level Two Flow Control Standards (matching peaks at the 2-and I 0- year, 24-hour storm event and durations between Y, of the 2-year and 50-year storm events). The released runoff flows south through a 120'-42" culvert underneath 128 1h St, into a drainage ditch behind 14415 SE 128 1h St. The ditch ranges from 2 to 3 feet deep and then travels 34' under a driveway via an 18-inch culvert. No formal drainage complaints were provided b King County or the City of Renton; however;overtopping of the ditch was noted on November 14, 2001 during a site visit on the Sienna Project. hes ormwa er appeared to be 2-3 feet below the existing house and did not enter the area behind the home within the chain link fence. Once the storn1water reaches the south property line of this parcel, the storm water enters the north property line of a recent development (Sienna). The flow is then picked up in an emergency overflow birdcage structure at SDMH, tightlined through the 36- inch bypass pipes within the Sienna development and conveyed in a southerly direction. (See Sienna Road and Storm Plans, Sheet 10 of 36-available in the appendix). At NE 2"d • Street (a.k.a. NE I 32"d St) the tight lined conveyance is joined by the tightlined and controlled 911812005 Job #04-257 /fRJAD ,,,,, ,,,,, __ ....... Page 7 • • i ------ • • • • Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis release from the Sienna wetpond. The 36" tightlined system turns west to run along NE 2"d street and turns south to follow the westside of Jericho Ave NE (a.k.a. 144th Ave). The tightlined flow is joined by an westward-flowing culvert underneath 144'11 Ave and continues west and then south as a ditch. The ditch is briefly culverted to the south under the intersection between SE 136th Street and 142nd Ave SE, and exits a 42-inch culvert with a trash rack into a large swale known as Maplewood Creek. The Maplewood Creek/swale meanders southand east as shown on the Topozone Topogrpahic Exhibit until reaching the outfall into Cedar River. At the time of the site visit the Maplewood Creek swale was dry. At the 42-inch culvert the creek is a broad swale (20 feet wide) and ten feet deep. The swales width, and especially its depth, increase towards Cedar River. It is more accurately described as a ravine as the drainage path is followed south . 911812005 ,lob #04-257 /TRIAD "" "'" .--~· Page 8 Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis • 4 TASK 4 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION • 4. 1 Downstream Description Drainage from the site is tributary to one drainage sub-basins. The The tributary associated with this project leads to collection point 6 as shown on the map of Lower Cedar River Tributaries available in the appendix. An aerial of the downstream drainage system through Maplewood Creek is available in the appendix. 4.1.1 Offsite Runoff to Cedar River Runoff from the basin is tributary to Cedar River and, ultimately, Lake Washington. The following narrative describes the downstream drainage paths for the basin. No downstream drainage problems were observed at the time of field investigation. 4.2 Downstream Problems A list of downstream drainage complaints within a I mile radius of the site was obtained per King County Request via the 2005 manual. WLRD Stormwater Services Section indicated that complaints pre-1990 are not readily available. In addition, complaints older than IO years are not required per the 2005 KCSWDM and, therefore, not included. Additionally, King County was not able to locate some of the complaints in the area and will not be included in this report. The list was evaluated for pertinent complaints within the downstream corridors of the site. The following narrative lists the downstream problems reported to the King County Water and Land Resource Division (KCWLRD). Downstream complaints lists for near by developments (ie. Shamrock, Sienna) were reviewed in addition to the complaints obtained for this project. According to complaints compiled by the King County Water and Land Resources Division available in the Shamrock Downstream Analysis (1/1/2004) several instances of past oocling have been reported in areas near. the downstream drainage path of the site. Problems of flooding and drainage in the are south of the Sienna project seem to have been 9/18/2005 Job #04-257 lrRIAD - Page 9 • • ----------------------------------------- Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis alleviated with the recent installation of a 36-inch pipe system . Details of these complaints -are available in the Shamrock Level I Downstream Analysis. Since the installation of the 36-inch conveyance system there has been one downstream complaint. This complaint comes from the resident at the address of 5511 NE 2nd Street. The resident complains of the roadside ditch overtopping. Per conversations with Ron Straka with the City of Renton, this is considered a maintenance issue. In addition, available topography suggests that potential over-flows from the Sienna project would flow east along 3rd Street to Lyons Avenue, then south along the west side of Lyons Avenue rather than further east to the subject property. Some complaints have been documented near the Martin project's downstream path. A compilation of the drainage complaints reviewed for this site are in the appendix. An Offsite Analysis Drainage System Complaint Map shows the approximate location of the drainage complaints on a Thomas Guide map. King County's 2005 Surface Water Manual does not require drainage complaints that are more than IO years old to be included in a Level Downstream Analysis due to the age of the problem, development that has occurred, etc . A list of drainage complaints within a one mile radius has been compiled and evaluated in reference to the proposed project's downstream drainage pathway. Please refer to the master list of complaints and annotated Offsite Analysis Drainage System Complaint Map included in the appendix. The complaint map shows the approximate location of the drainage complaints on a Thomas Guide map. King County's 2005 Surface Water Manual does not require drainage complaints that are more than IO years old to be included in a Level I Downstream Analysis due to the age of the problem, development that has occurred, etc. Complaints #1 through #42 have been listed, however, they are not within the downstream drainage path. Copies have been provided as informational only. The following complaints are due to either flooding or erosion. Drainage Complaint #28 (location shown on the Offsite Analaysis -Drainage Complaint Map) was at or near the intersection of 148th Ave SE and S.E. 136th Street in August of 1999. These were concerns about possible future flooding due to development at that location. Drainage Complaint #10 is a description of flooding near Amante Florist at 4801 NE 4th Renton, WA. This flooding was due to clogged cb's and culverts and appears to be a maintenance issue. The siltation of cb's and culverts will not be 911812005 Job #04-257 -- Page I 0 • Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis aggravated by development of the Martin Property due to not being located within the Martin Site's downstream path. Complaint #30 in August 2000 was due to citizen concern regarding flooding from upstream development. Capital Improvements were under taken to correct historic flooding expressed by this neighbor. The Martin Property is not upstream of this flooding described in this complaint and should not aggravate the situation during development. Complaint #12 in 1997 was flooding in Puget Colony Homes (also not downstream of the Martin Site). Complaint #16 and #17 were of ponding in yards and are not downstream of the proposed site. Compiaint #2 and #3 are related to a residence that is low with respect to the road and neighboring lots and storm water tends to pond in the driveway. This residence is not in the drainage path of the Martin property. Complaint #42 and #39 are regarding a pond outlet control structure that is not within the Martin Site's drainage path. It was clogged and flooding. The remaining drainage complaints on record that are not related to flooding or erosion were often related to suspected pollution or broken fences. Complaint #24, #2 l, #3 7 and #38 were pollution related. Complaint #5 is. at or near the intersection of SE ! 28th and 143rd is in • regards to possible pollution led to storm drainage system. Complaint # 15 is a broken fence at an RID pond outside of our drainage path. Complaint # 31 is a broken fence at easement. Complaint #4 is permission to vacate a road that is unrelated to this project. The proposed development of this site will not aggravate the above mentioned situations. • 5 TASK 5 MITIGATION OF EXISTING OR POTENTIAL PROBLEMS .-==~i/Ve!V(ff~ The project proposes to construct a storm water detention pond which will provi e Level 2 Flow Control per the 2005 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual. The pon will incorporate sufficient dead storage to also provide Basic Water Quality Treatment in accordance with King County requirements. Additionally, all new stom1 water conveyance systems will be designed in accordance with the criteria outlined in the current King County Surface Water Design Manual. 9/18/2005 Job #04-257 /rRIAP --· Page 11 Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis During the field investigation of the downstream drainage course ongomg eros10n or • downstream drainage problems were not observed onsite or near Cedar River. To mitigate any potential problems, overflow route for flows larger than the 10-year peak storm event will be directed into the downstream pipe system. The proposed detention pond will be modeled assuming the existing site as completely forested as required by the 2005 KCSWDM. Flows will be detained and released controlling the 2-and I 0-year peak flows as well as matching the durations of storm events from the 1/2 of the 2-year through the 50-year storm . • • 911812005 Job #04-257 /rRIAD Page 12 ' '" "< I -- • • • Martin Property -Level 1 Downstream Analysis APPENDIX iMAP DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE EXHIBIT ONSITE FEATURES EXHIBITS WESTSIDE OF SITE EASTSIDE OF SITE DRAINAGE BASINS (K.C. BASIN RECONNAISANCE PROGRAM 1987) LOWER CEDAR RIVER BASIN MAP (PRINTED 8-18-05) KING COUNTY COMMUNITY PLANNING AREAS FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP #530071 0350 A (F.E.M.A.) KING COUNTY SOILS SURVEY MAP AND LEGEND REPORT PREPARED BY AESI, INC. (January 27, 2005) TABLE 3.2.2.B OF THE 1998 KCSWDM TOPOZONE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP LOWER CEDAR RIVER TRIBUTARIES OFFSITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE OFFSITE ANALYSIS -DRAINAGE COMPLAINT MAP DRAINAGE COMPLAINTS TERRASERVER AERIAL IMAGE SENSITIVE AREAS FOLIO MAPS SIENNA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 9/18/2005 Job #04-257 Page 13 Map Output Page I of I (® King County ~ ~ K1§W11att-rt, ·.----------------- • • 0 CJ 0 * Tha Buffer Bu!fered Selection Tho,oos Brothers Map Page WLRD Surfaoo Water Engineering Projects ; :• County Boundmy Slmets # tti,pKff}" '""' Legend ;-I -,J\/ ~ O P£uoets D Lakes and Large Rrvers /'-/ Streams IG;;J WLRO Drainage Complaints he information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such Information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, Incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to. lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this ma is rohlbited exce I b written ermission of Kin Coun King Co_unty I GIS Center I News I $~rvices I Comm~nts j $~ar~h By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The_Q§!.~.i!§~ http://wwwS.metrokc.gov/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovcrvicw&Clie... 8/16/2005 (J l CULV "' ----...., ~ ,, it §;!o Cl.. V) 0 --"'\)~ u, \ 0 ·-....,,_ ' ' ' 's '-', \ \ \ \ \ '· \ " •J' " \ ' \ \ 0 0 \ \ ', \ \ \ ~--'6'... --\ 6" PVC CUL t-ERT INLET \ ,:,-00 \·---~~(~ , DITCH C '-;1-'.e"v, .. ~ • ~- 3.11'1----t" \ ~ ,, . \ ! \ \ \ , \ I 1SL~-• :r ~ ·¥--r-d~'@) I ·"' / / / / \ / /' / Iii j 1 '0 0 \\ ; "··-·-·-~--- ··-~,4.50, ....... ...,,_ \ ·,, .. ~, of\ -~p O " ·····, I ~ \ \ I ' \ '· ·, ""-, .......... \, \ '· '· 0 ', i rtS:L-~ ~/~-~ ·,j". ,~ \ '"'""·-.. ..... ! ., \ ' ' ' ' \ Ch ' I ----·· ··,< .. "'r: ... , ..... x~ I "' .... IJJ,.,_ ·.,, -·· ~~---~":> .sec· ··-458 ! f ·-r,...._,,_ -,.o,,,_ I / .~\ ;\ ~ .,/ p ,,., / ,· •. ,-· •..• \ •• ·f * • •• I• t ~, • • I • \ • . -'4.-" I/ , .. ~i-.-.-: ,.-. I ·o-o .'4 •: •• { -~ } ., .. ,,,. . ,.,, ,•s .. , ~: .,, :0:YL ·. ·. ~ ... -' ,-,..; .. ;, ,:.: - ' ! c-460-·, /' . D '··. ', 'J ; >.< · . l SHE ' ':!: .,, 7' :. l"•,"' \· -·~···-~ ........... •: 7 ' o--o--DITCH C. ' i \ 12439 148TH AVf. SE 1 STORY WOOD FRAME STRUCTURE \~{<(/({<'///,'// .. 4 1 ~ ) ~ ,, ---, 1 "'~ c·Ha o~"' ~--• . ' :0:YL WOOD BARN i( '\._ );( ,_ ~·!48 ~"-, ' ~ * \_ h,ns... · * ~\.fB.HANG _j 713J ' EAvE.1 ,--466.28 \ EAVE.1 ' t~ o;-,. I ~ .. ·, SWBC! I ElEfD ,, ' WOOD BARN ,, ' . ' .,, ... -·-· ,..,. \ I ! 10 * ', \ / ·-:.)s \ '· / ; ; ..... D CB D D < OJLV "" HB Ell w -0-UP E-GUY :0: YL --*--- --{}-- --so-- --OHP-- ~5-?J ,._...,.,l!I -., • CA TI:H BASIN ( TIP I ) DRAIN CULVERT HOSE BIB WA~ METER UTILITY POL£ GUY ANCHOR YARD LIGHT \\IRE FENCE AS NOTED WOOO FENCE AS NOTED STORM DRAIN LINE OVERHEAO POii£!! LINE WATER LINE GAS LINE ~. "'LT \ : \ .~ DITCH 8 · ------1c·o,.,,-·.-1--· --~-=----·-:c=:.:.~·:, ----~-- ( ·-O._::::.-., f}fTCh' 8 * ' , .. , CONCRETE SURFACE ASPHALT SURFACE / / __ ,., .. / ,,---··' , .. ,.,--.---- ,.-,/'. * @ p,- SOIL LOG WEllAND FlAG © 2005 TRIAD ASSOCIATES ~ ~ ... ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ (/) ~ " ~ ~~ 1?'11.21111111,-.._NI: _ .. _ 425.821.84il8 ~ZU21.>lal --.....C11S11tll"--- ).. .... ffi ~ ~ ~ ~ Q:: ~ :a: g I ~ ,: ,_ ~ 0 (J "' .. "' ~i'I ~- ?<}JcJ,J :J.J.J.j.J'..J :J<I ~ANACEl!-~-·-- r':lITTIITTnOR ----- r~~-,- PROJECT LiJiDS<:Art: ARCIIITECT FU51" Sl18KITTIJ. DATE: SCALI:; HO!II..: HTS 1'!11.:NTS STAMP NOT VAUD UNIL'SS SIGN[!) .I.ND DA'l?II JOii NO. 04-257 SHED NO. OF __ 9 0P_ f '· ... ,; . . S5 -• .1 ...... .. -1 "? ~ ',,, I . ' ) /;, p \ \ ' \ \ 0 \ , ------"'" ~· UP ----.----....: ; '-, ·~,,so, -----·-··· -----···---------· ---··· --···--~c, --458 i _, I r , b • I ~ : "' )( )( /r: ~ ' ~H«1 r I .-·-· ' /~\ YARD DRAIN UP \ , ) ' I -.Q,,_ I r- "' .'S *" °' . '1 \ ORY llfl.l.\ , 4. INLET PIPE l 8 "··;;, .~ -0~ \ I ':, 'i \ ---- ·, 'S '" ~ ~ ·- ?: ;;;;;1c r BUILDING 4.4' -~o -.,, \ ,. 0 ~ DRA'MNG IS NQT TO SCALE \ * 12439 148TH AVE SE 1 STORY WOOD FRAME STRUCTURE \ ,,I r \ \ I \ f •\-.~. ~ ! --. 0---0 .._ f ......... S'(MBOL LEGEND 0 CB CATCH BASIN ( TYP I ) 0 D DRAIN < CULV CULVERT e; HB HOSE BIB Bl l'!M WATER METER -0-UP UTILITY POLE E--GUY GUY ANCHOR :0: YL YARD LIGHT ---x---WIRE FENCE AS NOTED ---0------0---WOOD FENCE AS NOTED --SD--STORM DRAIN LINE --OHP--OVERHEAD PO\\£R LINE I -.... t~:,~;;}.7~~..1 lwEJti11t2l @ r" WATER LINE GAS LINE CONCRETE SURFACE ASPHALT SURFACE SOIL LOG WETLAND FLAG \ ' :, . \ \. .. ·--. . ~ C ·,:-\ --,. - . \ ' ---~ . ._ .... ,, \ ; ~ f ---, I T\~ o* "' ~ WOOMS. ' '.~~ ~ , r Uig;a~ H * x~ EAVE.1 lfE.,_..dtlQ_ _J 713:, '· r--""'''--~s.2s VE.1 '-...._ \ \ '· ' ·, ·,...._,, WOOD BARN ···-; __ }::,:,, ' ' \ x x:-i \ \ . .I " "'!' )i< \ \ .\)"' I~ , --J . \ \ ··, ~l \ \ \ * 10 / ; * DITCH ():: ~;::. J ,.,al( -l( ,, .. ~ _ ... * \ )( )( *\/ . r .... :DITCH \} ---· ·"=-----c····· --x ... ~ ·--.. -X ----~·· }( ,... ·X X ····· * / c' >.< --------- ----------- ----- ----- l'!M UPI IE w a, ~ C i!: ' .. ~-- CJ) ~ ~ ~ -CJ) ~ 0 "' 9 CJ) >- CJ) ~ 0 121u1m..-.NE .....,..,__, .,.,., .... 4211.ct.klltD IOCIMI.Ol'II IDII ---- ::.... .... f5 ~ C) ~ ;!: ~ Q: ~ g I ~ ,: .... !s 0 " ~ ~ ~F---------- :; ~ ii;I~ -,~ i~ g<J<KY-.KJ,yJ();J'.]cJ<J PROJF.rl liLI.NAGEf PROJECT S\IRVE'IDR--··--· fROJocf~-- PROJECT 1.1.NDSCAP( ARfllrTECT FlRSI' SI.IBWITTAL JlAn:: SCALE: BORIZ-: ltl!T.: smrr NOT V4UD \INLESS SIGNEII AND DATIII JOB NO. 04-257. SHH1 NO. • OF • f9 .l··· J-~ ~1 1t ~ I t '"" I \ . ( '-.~t, •. .. ~1 vl .. ,- ; i. / ·-r \i :,.. ______ \\ '.\ ,i ''i I I i i I i I I I :... \ I i \ ' ·- ~I -I :~--- i•/ t ' ,;,;,-·. .ORAi NAG. \ ·-•.,o..:z;.,\,... \ . :.: ·-. ' \ ~, ( .. - \ ) -~ ' . ! J ' ...... \ ... ¢ /,11 ',·,<~f~<~~ J ~ J . \. q ~ ~ ., Bu<lloy ·-·-------j7~ !~~ .....----~ .::-..... , =,: t..:_. J l ~ } :::- 1.~ -V '.;::""'-~ __,. - ~ - . .. I .:::::::.--..,~ .. -- '~ ,· , .. ~---...... - ., - _F .... "· -~ ....... ~ '!ffY()F S£&TH.f W4t(R5HE0 ~ ----- -;I ./.~ BASIN • .... _.....__., ' ...,~·-·-·· ···-• "'(-•• _ J, , .... -. • ~ '· '. -~· ' \ ..., . <:·r: '-=-';' ,:::: ~ .... BASIN -Foti! ;~- ,·-··· .. ~ ' ti ,,., ~ J·-·-=;-------·---·-·-·--.,..;---------~--------.--, ·-· -'v. :: if. ,_/., . ,-1; '= - ' ' \ < i -. \ \ -( /':--j ·-·:1 '":::, -~~-~=~ ~i ftrNS "~N OQUAl MIC .iUVER ~ -~ ·-· 'l .. -.,_ '. Jf( 'NAr10,AL f01'LSt ;, ~-,#~· , a~ J.... ,-.~ r=-- i L :::-) :~SIN ·_:·· ;. --:-'I,. .. ; -- -~- Cl -- .,,---.... ·-;),. ·s \ ,·· i ./ ,,· ... · .. -:.~_'."' -~ 2i:.. ·, -..;_ .. ·~ \ ,--· ' ··-=t \ > -../ I \ . ,.. I ' ./ "-·,. ' + I ·~ ... ' ::::; . ) -:. -·::: "l "'='" -.:\ ~~. • f,, -··-,~~ • 1. "\t ... >1 ;I. ·--=-· ~ • 0 • " ., " .. 1:-•. , ~ .J DRAINAGE BASINS K ing County 1987 Major Basin Boundary Sub-Basin Boundary Source: Ki"9 County Basin Reconnaissance Program \\ \ .... .... I ~~ "'-' -~-,.._. ·~ ... t I . ~ .. -\ ' -~,-~-\ _,,. 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MIios 1 : 300,000 • • Lower Cedar River Basin Map m1Em111Ci40A4¥ Comments Ai¥119'M Natural Resources and Parks » Water and Land Resources Division » Lower Cedar River Basin .. . . ' ' ·: . ...,_ " ~ .... IM.,. { . ~ ,._, ... 1 c. .... i.· -" ' \. ,\. ~; \ ·' \, .. .,, ····· , . Page I of 1 • .. ·. ' l•d! C.uk _,-. ..,., P'o1 fl«-6:,.y 1ob....-w ec,.,.M"Y lr<O'N"O't'li Atta br.rdarv Ufb.o"" C,o..,lrt AulO loudor, Back to the Cedar River Basin Plan Upda~d :May29 , 1998 Kir}g County_ I Natural Resources & Parks I Water & Lang I News I Serv ices I Comments I Search Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County . By visiting this and other King County web pages , you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of th e site. The details. http ://dnr.metrokc.gov/w lr/BASINS/cedarrnap.htm 8/18/2005 ••• • • I .,,. -·-·-·y -f._,-=.fr:n:";]~,d-. '·\ i1 :j i I i i / / ; i j i I \ ·, I i ,-- \ Figure 1 KING COUNTY COMMUNITY PLANNING AREAS King Counw 1986 0 1 2 I 4 5 6 7 IMI ... 1 ,100,000 ::-\__ ..... / • • • This m.ap is for flood Insurance pur,,oses only; it does not n eces- ~arily show all areas subject to noodin s In the com m unity or all planimetric featu res outside special nood hazard areas. For adjoining map panels, see separately printed Index To Map Panels. For description of Elevation Reference Marks, see panel 530071 0175A INITIAL IDENTIFICATION JANUARY 17, 1975 CONVERSION TO REGULAR PROGRAM S EPTEMBER 29, 1978 j f ~@ A, ... -rr ~ ' -l '1 --J. 'Z. --~-'-I: ij ~~ ~ \.I. ~ ~ \ I '-v,._L_ ----.:-· \ .~ .. ~_:-,t \,,-if) I\ ~--~~- <'.j "11\T6' Sm:; t..Ot.AT1DN ~ f. L l .. -· -.J .. J. -~1----4~~-~"'r· -~ rt·~--~-r= -~-· 12e>~~~ NE rt ! µ~ Q '" . i I ; r -11· ~ t l . t t~~... ~· . f t ~ I ----=, I -r ~ ~ }. Refer t o the CONVERSION TO REGULAR PROGRAM date shown on th is map to determine when ac tuarial rates apply 10 structures in the zone\ where elevat ions o r depths have been estabhs hc:d . To determine II 1lood insurance is available in this community, conuct your insur.incc .igent, or call the N.ational Flood Insur- ance Program, at (800) 638~620, or (800) 424 -8872. ~ APPROXIMATE SCALE 2000 0 2000 FEET F:-3 E-3 E3 ~,~{.: .. l ~ .... , ZONE A5 .1 , ,_ r ... Y , ;t J \ "'1 .... ~\ r~ fl ~ V / ~ .. ·~ :L.,~ .. ' ' . . ~ n ~ -,_? '1 ,. -:~.rF1 r-. f ( \' ·~-'-'; . .--.Ir:~ f \ \ ~~ ~. ~'<-• ~ lt,,µJ~~(f ~-. ~~cj/~ . , • ·~~ ~ . y(~l .. . ,,..._,V ·9""" ~-f I ,._ \~ ... ,{ I ,1---• ''\., ·,r ~ r ~ . . j •. ~J .. =----'r~ 1, ....... = l _, } ··-~[ r 1 , l·--r-J . -( l 1~1., . , -·1 ~!---,.a --I -4-4-l -1 I -~--- -·-) \ ~, I 7 , ZONE B ~ ~ ... ~~ &~ ~6.0 ~ " ~ :::: I 1 14 116 -? \ '\ ) a NAllJIIAL FLOOD INSU~NCE PIOHAM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON (UNINCORPORATED AREAS ) COMMUNITY ·PANEL NUMBER 530071 0350 A PAGE 350 OF 650 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PAGES NOT PRINTED) EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 29, 1978 . I 00 ;;;....- U.S . DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT I .FED ERAL I N SU RAN CE A DM INISTRATION ,/ 182 ' / Ef£:_r -~~!'J!J! / ~ '""'1~---. ~ I 1 ,i , , I . :• ; '~...:ics~~ -=-= I , I. ~ ~~ • ~o .. ~ ' • /\_ 530071 0175 A t ,(> ~'\: 530071 "" 0 "" :s .. g f! .3 0 Town of Black Diamond Green 530071 0575 A 5300 53007 530071 SOlL MA.P ~INC::1 COl)tJT)' SOILS SURVEY M~P SHEET N0.11 KING COUNTY AREA, WASHINGTON (RENTON QUADRANGLE) \(\N~ (D . ~ILS SUJi!.vE'/ ~I N6 CDUNl'f SOIL..S SUR\/Ey L£tiEND. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE CONSERVATION SERVICE SOIL LEGEND The first copirol le11er is rhe inillol one of 1he soil nome. A second capitol lener, A, 8, C, D, E, Of" F, fndi<::otes the class of slope. Symbolll withotil <l 1.lope letter ore those of nearly level soils. SYMBOL AgB ~AgC AgD AkF AmB Am( Ao B•C B•D O,F os B, Bo Cb loA lo( loD KpB Ke( KpO K,C Mo Ne( Ng Nk No (), o, 0,,( 0..D O,,F p, Pk Po Py Ro( RoD RdC RdE R• Rh NAME Atderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 6 percenl slopes Alderwood gravelly sandy loom, 6 to 15 p.rcenl slopes Alderwood gravelly sandy loom, 15 to 30 percent slopes Alderwood ond Kiisop soils, very sleep Ar.,nts, Alderwood moterlol, 0 lo 6 pen:enl slopes • Arents, Alderwood material, 6 to 15 percent slopes• A,enrs, Everett material• Beousit., gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slQPfls Beousile gravelly sandy loam, 15 10 30 pctrceol $lopes !;1,.0 usit" gravelly sandy loom, 40 to 75 pe,cen! slopes a.11,nghom .,11 ,_ ... Brlscot silt loom Bvckley sih loom (OQstol Beochu Eorlmont silt loom Edgewicl,; fine sandy loom E,,.e,e!t grovel!y sondy loom, 0 to 5 percent slop<i-s E,,.erett gravelly sandy l<>am, 5 to 15 percenl slopes Everell grove!ly sondy loom, 15 to 30 percenl slopes Everelt·Alderwood g,0 velly sondy looms, 6 10 15 pt1rcen• slopes lnd,onolo loomy Fine sond, 0 to 4 petct1nl slop,is lndionolo l(>Qmy fine sond, d lo 15 percl!nl slopes lndionolo loomy fone sond, 15 to JO percl!nt slop,,s Kirsop silt loom, 2 to 8 percent slopes Kitsop sill loom, 8 10 15 percl!nt slopes Kitsop sih loom, 15 to 30 pl!rCenl slopes Kious gro .. elly loamy sond, 6 to 15 p,,rcenl slopes Mi~ed oJlv,..iol lond Neiltoo "•'Y 9rovt1lly loamy send, 2 to 15 percen• slopes Newbe,9 slit loom Nooksock sih loom Normo sondy loom Orcos peot Oridio silt loom O...otl gravelly loom, 0 lo 15 percenr slopes O...oll 9ro"f!!ly loom, 15 lo 25 percent slopes Ovall gravelly loom, 40 lo 75 pe,cen, $lopes PilchV<:k loomy Fine sond Pilchuck Fine sondy loom Pvget silty cloy loom Pvyollup fine sondy loom Rognor fine sondy loom, 6 IO 15 percent slopes Rognor fine sandy loom, IS to 25 percent slopes Ragnor-lndionolo as50Ciotioo, sloping• Ragnor-lndianola assoclo!lan, moclerotely steep• Renton s i h loom Ri,..e<wosh So Sola! $ill foam Sh Sammamish silt loom ik Seat! le mvd< Sm Sho!cor mvck Sn Slsih loam So Snohami11h sih loom Sr Snohomish sill loom, thick surfoc111 "orion, Sv Sulton silt loom Tu Tvkwila muck Urban land Wo WO<><lin,,.IJle silt loom • The composlt!an of these vnits i$ more vorlable lhon thot of lhe others in 1he area, but II hos been controlled we11 enovgh to lnlerprel for 1h111 expected use of !he soils. KING COUNTY AREA, WASHINGTC Boundary, notionol Sro,e .... County, Pori'!.h, (ivil township, 1 lncorporo•ed ci•y Rese,vorion, nor. Smo!I porl., ceme SecliOn !,ne. nor Un Bovndory manulnf"n> Building-,; (dwelling, School, church. ond Bv,lding~ (born, "''" Power 1<on-,;m,-ssior Well-,; nther rhc,n W<>f• Loco•ed or lond,no,I.. Qther rec<>veroble • Horiror,10\ conrrol ,,, Any recoveroble me Ver!ico! control stoti Other recoverable, Checked spo, ele .. 01i, Unchecked spo• .. 1e.-c • • • SUBSlJRFACE EXPLORATION, GEOLOGIC HAZARD, AND PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT MARTIN PROPERTY King County, Washington Prepared for: CmnWest Development, Inc. 9720 NE 120'" Place, Suite 100 Kirkland, Washington 98034 Prepared by: Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. 911 5'" A venue, Suite I 00 Kirkland, Washington 98033 425-827-7701 Fax: 425-827-5424 January 27, 2005 Project No. KE04710A • • • Martin Property King County, Washington 1.0 INTRODUCTION Subswface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Project and Site Conditions I. PROJECT AND SITE CONDITIONS This report presents the results of our subsurface exploration, geologic hazard, and preliminary geotechnical engineering study for the proposed new residential development. Our recommendations are preliminary in that project plans are still under development at the time of our exploration and preparation of this report. The project site location is shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure I. The existing site features, topography, and approximate locations of the explorations accomplished for this study are presented on the Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 2. The locations of the proposed improvements were not available at the time this report was completed. Therefore, the conclusions and recommendations contained. in this report should he reviewed and modified, or verified, as necessary once project plans and details are developed. 1.1 Purpose and Scope The purpose of this study was to provide subsurface data to be used in the preliminary design of the project. Our study included a review of selected geologic literature, excavating exploration pits, and performing geologic studies to assess the type, thickness, distribution, and physical properties of the subsurface sediments and shallow ground water conditions. Preliminary geotechnical engineering studies were completed to formulate our recommendations for site preparation, site grading, house construction, drainage, and paving. This report summarizes our current fieldwork and offers development recommendations based on our present understanding of the project. We recommend that we be allowed to review project plans prior to construction to verify that our geotechnical engineering recommendations have been correctly interpreted and incorporated into the design. Additional exploration or design modifications/review may be required to finalize project documentation. 1.2 Authorization Written authorization to proceed with this study was granted by Ms. Sara Slatten of CamWest Development, Inc. (CamWest) by means of a signed copy of our scope of work and cost proposal dated November 9, 2004. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of CamWest and their agents for specific application to this project. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering and engineering geology practices in effect in this area at the time our report was prepared. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. January 27, 2005 • ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGB!m -KE047/0A2 -Projr.r11\20047!0\KC\WI' Page I r- • • • Martin Property KinR County, Washington 2.0 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnica/ Engineering Report Project and Sile Conditions This report was completed with an understanding of the project based on a preliminary plot plan with proposed exploration locations provided to us by CamWest. The plan does not show lot layouts or road locations. Site grading plans were also not available when this report was prepared. The plot plan was used as a basis for Figure 2 of this report. The project site includes one rectangular-shaped parcel currently developed as a rural residential property. The parcel is roughly 3.69 acres in overall area. A house and barn occupy the eastern portion of the parcel. The north, west, and south property lines border existing CamWest developments currently under construction. The eastern property line borders other rural residential properties. The majority of the property is covered with pasture used for goat, sheep, aml horse grazing. Deciduous trees are scattered throughout the property. A small ephemeral wetland exists near the west property line. Overall vertical relief across the site is approximately 24 feet. The property slopes gently to the southwest. The proposed project is anticipated to include construction of residential building Jots, access roads, buried utilities, and other typical improvements. The planning for this project was in the conceptual phase at the time this report was written and details such as cut and fill areas and amounts, lot and street layouts, detention facility locations, etc. were not known. However, we assume that storm water detention facilities will be constructed in the southwest site corner or storm water will be conveyed to the adjacent CamWest development storm water facilities. 3.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Our field study included the planned excavation of nine exploration pits to gain subsurface information about the site. The exploration locations were staked in the field by CamWest during our subsurface exploration. The various types of sediments, as well as the depths where characteristics of the sediments changed, are indicated on the exploration logs presented in the Appendix. The depths indicated on the logs where conditions changed may represent gradational variations between sediment types in the field. The conclusions and. recommendations presented in this report are based on the mne exploration pits completed for this study. The number, locations, and depths of the explorations were completed within site and budgetary constraints. Because of the nature of exploratory work below ground, extrapolation of subsurface conditions between field explorations is necessary. It should be noted that differing subsurface conditions may sometimes be present due to the random nature of deposition and the alteration of topography January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EAR'l1l SCIENCES, INC. SGJl/m -KJ:;047/0AZ-rrojuu\2004710\KF.IWP Page 2 • • • Ma,1in Property King County. Washington Subsurface Exploration. Geologic Hazard. and Preliminary Geoter.hnical Engineering Report Project and Site Conditions by past grading and/or filling. The nature and extent of any variations between the field explorations may not become fully evident until construction. If variations are observed at that time, it may be necessary to re-evaluate specific recommendations in this report and make appropriate changes. 3. 1 Exploration Pits The exploration pits were excavated using a rubber-tired backhoe. The pits permitted direct, visual observation of subsurface conditions. Materials encountered in the exploration pits were studied and classified in the field by a geotechnical engineer from our firm. All exploration pits were backfilled immediately after examination and logging. Selected samples were then transported to our laboratory for further visual classification and testing, as necessary. 4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions at the project site were inferred from the field explorations accomplished for this study, visual reconnaissance of the site, and review of selected geologic literature. The general distribution of geologic units is shown on the field logs in the Appendix to this report. The explorations generally encountered a relatively thick sequence of topsoil and organic weathered soils over medium dense grading to very dense silty sand with gravel and cobbles interpreted as lodgement till. The on-site sediments are mapped as Vashon till deposits on the Geologic Map of King County, Washington by Booth et al., 2002. 4.1 Stratigraphy Grass/Topsoil A surficial layer of grass and organic topsoil was encountered at the location of each of the exploration pits. This organic layer ranged from approximately 10 to 31 inches in thickness. Due to their high organic content, these materials are not considered suitable for foundation, roadway, or slab-on-grade floor support, or for use in a structural fill. Below the organic topsoil, we encountered loose to medium dense, brown to dark brown weathered soils derived from the underlying lodgement till. This material varied across the site in thickness, density, and organic/root/wood content. It is not considered suitable for foundation support, but may be used at the discretion of the Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AES!) field representative for support of pavement and structural fill in areas where it contains only minor amounts of organics, and can be compacted to project specifications described in the Preliminary Design Recommendations section of this report. Because of its relatively high organic content, it should not be used as structural fill. January 27. 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SGENCES. INC. SGlllsn ·· KE04710A2 -f'mjects\20047J01KE\W/' Page 3 ,) • • • Manin Property King Coullly, Washington Vashon Lodgement Till Subsurface Exploration, Geologic.Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Project and Site Conditions All of our exploration pits encountered medium dense grading to very dense, silty sand with gravel, cobbles, and occasional boulders interpreted as lodgement till. The lodgement till observed in our explorations graded from mottled gray and brown near the surface to gray and weakly to moderately cemented at depth. Lodgement till was deposited at the ~ase of an active continental glacier and was subsequently compacted by the weight of the overlying glacial ice. Lodgement till typically possesses high strength and low compressibility attributes that are favorable for support of foundations, floor slabs, and paving with proper preparation. Lodgement till is silty and moisture-sensitive. In the presence of moisture contents above the optimum moisture content for compaction purposes, lodgement till can be easily disturbed by .vehicles and earthwork equipment. Careful management of moisture-sensitive soils, as recommended in this report, will be needed to reduce the potential for disturbance of wet lodgement till soils and costs associated with repairing disturbed soils. 4.2 Hydrology Ground water was encountered in severai exploration pits at or near the contact with the weathered soil and lodgement till. Our exploration pits provide a reasonable assessment of ground water conditions that may be encountered during normal construction activities during the middle or beginning of the "wet" season. We expect that increased seepage could occur throughout the site during normal construction activities that begin towards the end of the "wet" season in April. This seepage is representative of interflow. Interflow commonly occurs in areas underlain by lodgement till and originates as surface water that percolates down through the near-surface, relatively permeable weathered soils and becomes trapped or "perched" atop the underlying, relatively impermeable, unweathered lodgement till sediments. Interflow is often a seasonal phenomenon. It should be noted that the presence and depth of seepage at the site may vary in response to such factors as changes in season, precipitation, and site use. 4.3 Laboratory Test Results Laboratory testing on selected soil samples from explorations was completed in accordance with report requirements typically requested by CamWest. Laboratory testing results are also included in the Appendix. Moisture content was tested in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM):D-2216. Table I summarizes the moisture content laboratory results. Table I also provides the depth to bearing soils identified in each test pit January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SG1J!sn -KE047lnAZ-/'r<!ft'Cli12004710\K£1Wl' Page 4 e e • Martin Property King County, Washington Approximate Ground Surface Exploration Elevation Pit (feet) EP-l 453 EP-2 450 EP-3 455 EP-4 462 EP-5 465 EP-6 448 EP-7 453 EP-8 4.57 EP-9 457 Table I Depth to Bearing Soil (feet) 2 2 2 3 3 3.5 3 2.5 1.5 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geolechnical Engineering Report Pro;ea and Site Conditions Approximate Bearing Soil Elevation Existing Moisture Content (feet) (percent)' 451 14.2@ 3' 448 14.2@ 3.5' 453 16.3@ 3' 459 14.0@ 3' 462 20.5 @3' 444.5 10.9@4' 450 12.8@ 3.5' 454.5 15.6@ 3' 455.5 18.4@ 2.5' • All samples arc above optimum moisture content for compaction. The maximum dry density of one soil sample was determined using the modified Proctor test procedure (ASTM:D-1557). The results are as follows in Table 2. Table 2 Maximum Dry Density Optimum Moisture Conteut Sample Location Sample Type (pc0°i (percent)'" EP-1@ 3' Lodgement Till 135.4 7 0 > pd = pounds per cubic foot. m Reported results are corrected for gravel content . January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EART/f SCIENCES, INC. SGlllm -Kl:..047/0112 -l'rojects\20047IO\KE\Wf' Page 5 • • • Martin Property King County, Washington Subsu,face Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geoteclmical Engineering Report Geologic Hazards and Mitigations II. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS The following discussion of potential geologic hazards is based on the geologic, slope, and shallow ground water conditions as observed and discussed herein. 5.0 SEISMIC HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS Earthquakes occur in the Puget Lowland with great regularity. Most of these events are small and are usually not felt by humans. However, large earthquakes do occur as evidenced by the 2001, 6.8-magnitude event; the 1965, 6.5-magnitude event; and the 1949, 7.2-magnitude event. The 1949 earthquake appears to have been the largest in this region during recorded history and was centered in the Olympia area. Evaluation of earthquake return rates indicates that an earthquake of the magnitude between 5.5 and 6.0 is likely within a given 20-year period. Generally, there are four types of potential geologic hazards associated with large seismic events: I) surficial ground rupture; 2) seismically induced landslides; 3) liquefaction; and 4) ground motion. The potential for each of these hazards to adversely impact the proposed project is discussed below. 5 .1 Surficial Ground Rupture Generally, the largest earthquakes that have. occurred in the Puget Sound area are sub-crustal events with epicenters ranging from 50 to 70 kilometers in depth. For this reason, no surficial faulting or earth rupture, as a result of deep, seismic activity has been documented, to date, in the area of the subject site. Therefore, it is our opinion, based on existing geologic data, that the risk of surface rupture impacting the proposed project is low. 5.2 Seismically Induced Landslides It is our opinion that the risk of damage to the proposed structures by seismically induced landsliding is low due to gentle slope inclinations that exist on the site. 5. 3 Liquefaction Liquefaction is a temporary loss in soil shear strength that can occur when loose granular soils below the ground water table are exposed to cyclic accelerations such as those that occur during earthquakes. The observed site soils were generally dense and silty and are not expected to be prone to liquefaction. A detailed liquefaction analysis was not completed as a part of this study, and none is warranted, in our opinion. · January 2 7, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGD!m -K£047/0A2 -Pmjects\2()()4710\KE\WI' Page 6 • • • Martin Properly King County, Washington 5.4 Ground Motion Subswface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Geologic Hazards and Mitigations The project site is located within a Zone 3 rating for seismic activity on a scale of I (lowest) to 4 (highest) based on the Seismic 'Zone Map of the United States, Figure No. 16-2 in the 1997 edition of the Uniform Building Code (UBC). This zonation is based on past earthquake activity in the Puget Sound region. As such, design recommendations in this report accommodate the possible effect of seismic activity in areas with a Zone 3 rating corresponding to a peak ground acceleration of 0.2g (a Richter magnitude 7 .5 earthquake occurring directly beneath the site) in accordance with lJBC guidelines using soil type Sc. This soil type corresponds to seismic coefficients: C, = 0.33 and C, = 0.45. Design of the project should also he consistent with 2003 International Building Code (!BC) guidelines. In accordance with the 2003 IBC, the following values should he used: Site Class "C" ·(Table 1615.1.1) Ss = 125% (Figure 1516[1]), F, = 1.0 (Table 1615.1.2[1]) S1 = 45% (Figure 1516[2]), F, = 1.4 (Table 1615.1.2[2]) 6.0 EROSION HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS The sediments underlying the site generally contain silt and fine sand and will be sensitive to erosion, especially in the sloping portions of the site. In order to reduce the amount of sediment transport off the site during construction, the following recommendations should be followed. I. Silt fencing should be placed around the lower perimeter of all cleared area(s). All silt fencing must be keyed into the existing subgrade a minimum of 6 inches. The fencing should be periodically inspected and maintained as necessary to ensure proper function. 2. To the extent possible, earthwork-related construction should proceed during the drier periods of the year and disturbed areas should be revegetated as soon as possible. Temporary erosion co_ntrol measures should be maintained until permanent erosion control measures are established. 3. Areas stripped of vegetation during construction should be mulched and hydroseeded, replanted as soon as possible, or otherwise protected. During winter construction, hydroseeded areas should be covered with clear plastic to facilitate grass growth . January 2 7, 2005 ASSOC!ATFD EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SCfllrn -KE047IOA2 -/'wjcm\20047J01KF.\WP Page 7 • • • Manin Property Kin~ County, Washington Subswface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Geologic Hazards and Mitigations 4. If excavated soils are to be stockpiled on the site for reuse, measures should be taken to reduce the potential for erosion from the stockpile. These could include, but are not limited to, covering the pile with plastic sheeting, the use of low stockpiles in flat areas, and the use of straw bales/silt fences around pile perimeters. 5. Interceptor swales with rock check dams should be constructed to divert storm water from construction areas and to route collected storm water to an appropriate discharge location. 6. A rock construction entrance should be provided to reduce the amount of sediment transported off-site on truck tires. 7. All storm water from impermeable surfaces, including driveways and roofs, should be tightlined into approved facilities and not be directed onto or above steeply sloping areas (including cut and fill slopes). 7.0 LANDSLIDE HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS The project site is characterized by gentle slopes with a low landslide risk and no detailed landslide hazard analysis is warranted, in our opinion . January 27. 200.5 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. s<,n1t,, -KE04710A2 -· Projcr.ts\2004710\KF.\WP Page 8 e e • Martin Property King County, Washington Subsu,jace Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations III. PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 8.0 INTRODUCTION Our exploration indicates that, from a geotechnical standpoint, the proposed project is feasible provided the recommendations contained herein are properly followed. The bearing stratum is relatively shallow, and conventional shallow foundations and standard pavement sections should perform well with proper subgrade preparation in most areas. 9.0 SITE PREPARATION Site preparation of building and pavement areas should include removal of all grass, trees, brush, debris, and any other deleterious materials. If the existing structures are not part of future development plans, the structures should be demolished and any remaining foundation elements or buried utilities that are not to remain operational should he removed. All existing fill around structures that are to be demolished should be removed. Existing septic systems that are not to be reused should be decommissioned in accordance with King County Health Department requirements and removed from beneath any areas where structures or paving are plaimed. If any water wells exist on-site, they should be decommissioned by a licensed well driller in accordance with Washington Administrative Code Section l 73-160. If any heating oil storage tanks or other similar structures are present on-site, they should be decommissioned and removed in accordance with applicable Washington State Department of Ecology regulations. Any depressions below planned final grades caused by demolition activities should be backfilled with structural fill as discussed under the Structural Fill section. The existing grass, topsoil, and organic weathered soils should be removed from areas where new buildings, paving, or other structures are planned. These materials will "swell" some 25 to 30 percent upon excavation. The actual observed in-place depth of sod, topsoil, and organic weathered soils at the exploration locations is presented on the exploration logs in the Appendix. After stripping, remaining roots and stumps should be removed from structural areas. All soils disturbed by stripping and grubbing operations should be recompacted as described below for structural fill. Once excavation to subgrade elevation is complete, the resulting surface should be proof-rolled with a loaded dump truck or other suitable equipment. Any soft, loose, or yielding areas should be excavated to expose suitable hearing soils. The subgrade should then be compacted to at least 90 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density as determined by the ASTM:D-1557 test procedure. Structural fill can then be placed to achieve desired grades, if needed. January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EA/1111 SCIENCES, INC. SGBlln -Kt:04710112 -/'rojects\2004710\KE\WP Page 9 • • • Martin Property King County, Washington 9.1 Temporary Cut Slopes Subswface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations In our opinion, stable construction slopes should be the responsibility of the contractor and should be determined during construction. For estimating purposes, however, temporary unsupported cut slopes can be planned at lH:lV (Horizontal:Vertical) or flatter in the lodgement till. Permanent cut or fill slopes should not be steeper than 2H: IV. These slope angles are for areas where ground water seepage is not encountered, and assume that surface water is not allowed to flow across the temporary slope faces. If ground or surface water is present when the temporary excavation slopes are exposed, flatter slope angles will be required. As is typical with earthwork operations, some sloughing and raveling may occur and cut slopes may have to be adjusted in the field. In addition, WISHA/OSHA regulations should be followed at all times. 9.2 Site Disturbance Most of the on-site soils contain substantial fine-grained material which makes them moisture- sensitive and subject to disturbance when wet. The contractor must use care during site preparation and excavation operations so that the underlying soils are not softened. If disturbance occurs, the softened soils should be removed and the area brought to grade with structural fill. 9 .3 Winter Construction Due to the high in-situ moisture content of most of the site soils determined by laboratory testing completed for this study, it will be necessary to dry some of the site soils during favorable dry weather conditions to allow reuse in structural fill applications. If construction takes place in winter, drying is not expected to be feasible, and we anticipate that the lodgement till soils will be unsuitable for structural fill applications. Even during dry weather, site soils excavated for .installation of buried utilities might not be suitable for utility backfill under paving or other structures. We recommend budgeting for backfill of buried utility trenches in structural areas with imported, select structural fill. For summer construction, significant, but unavoidable effort may be needed to scarify, aerate, and dry site soils that are above optimum moisture content to reduce moisture content prior to compaction in structural fill applications. Care should be taken to seal all earthwork areas during mass grading at the end of each workday by grading all surfaces io drain and sealing them with a smooth-drum roller. Stockpiled soils that will be reused in structural fill applications should he covered whenever rain is possible. If winter construction is expected, crushed rock fill could be used to provide construction staging areas. The stripped suhgrade should be observed by the geotechnical engineer and should then he covered with a geotextile fabric such as Mirati .500X or equivalent. Once the January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. SGlllsn -K£04710A2-f'rojec:u\20047/0IKF.IWP Page JO e • • Martin Property King County, Washington Subswface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations fabric is placed, we recommend using a crushed rock fill layer at least 10 inches thick in areas where construction equipment will be used. If desired, planned roadways can be paved with asphalt treated base (ATB) for construction staging as described in the Pavement Recommendations section of this report. 10.0 STRUCTURAL FILL Structural fill may be necessary to establish desired grades. All references to structural fill in this report refer to subgrade preparation, fill type, placement, and compaction of materials as discussed in this section. If a percentage of compaction is specified under another section of this report, the value given in that section should be used. After stripping, planned excavation, and any required overexcavation have been performed to the satisfaction of the geotechnical engineer/engineering geologist, the upper 12 inches of exposed ground should be recompacted to 90 percent of ASTM:D-1557. If the subgrade contains too much moisture, adequate recompaction may be difficult or impossible to obtain and should probably not he attempted. In lieu of recompaction, the area to receive fill should be blanketed with washed rock or quarry spalls to act as a capillary break between the new fill and the wet subgrade. Where the exposed ground remains soft and further overexcavation is impractical, placement of an engineering stabilization fabric may be necessary to prevent contamination of the free-draining layer by silt migration from below. After recompaction of the exposed ground is tested and approved, or a free-draining rock course is laid, structural fill may be placed to attain desired grades. Structural fill is defined as non-organic soil, acceptable to the geotechnical engineer, placed in maximum 8-inch loose lifts with each lift being compacted to 95 percent of ASTM:D-1557. In the case of roadway and utility trench filling, the backfill should be placed and compacted in accordance with King County codes and standards. The top of the compacted fill should extend horizontally outward a minimum distance of 3 feet beyond the location of the perimeter footings or roadway edges before sloping down at a maximum angle of 2H: IV. The contractor should note that any proposed fill soils must be evaluated by AES! prior to their use in fills. This would require that we have a sample of the material at least 72 hours in advance to perform a Proctor test and determine its field compaction standard. We have completed one such test on a representative sample of the lodgement till and the results are included in this report. Soils in which the amount of fine-grained material (smaller than the No. 200 sieve) is greater than approximately 5 percent (measured on the minus No. 4 sieve size) should be considered moisture-sensitive. Use of moisture-sensitive soil in structural fills should be limited to favorable dry weather and dry subgrade conditions. The on-site lodgement till contains substantial amounts of silt and is considered highly moisture--sensitive when excavated and used as structural fill. At the time of our exploration program, soil January 27, 2005 ASSOCTATED EARTH SCIENCHS, INC. SGlllsn -KE04710A2 -l'rojem\2004710\KE\WP Page 11 e • • Martin Properly King County, Washington Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report · Preliminary Design Recommendations moisture content tests indicated that all soils encountered were at moisture conditions above optimum for structural fill use. We anticipate that most excavated lodgement till soils will require aeration and drying prior to compaction in structural fill applications. Construction equipment traversing the site when the soils are wet can cause considerable disturbance. · If fill is placed during wet weather or if proper compaction cannot be obtained, a select import material consisting of a clean, free-draining gravel and/or sand should be used. Free-draining fill consists of non-organic soil with the amount of fine-grained material limited to 5 percent by weight when measured on the minus No. 4 sieve fraction and at least 25 percent retained on the No. 4 sieve. 11.0 FOUNDATIONS Spread footings may be used for building support when they are founded on approved structural fill placed as described above, or on the glacial sediments that are prepared as recommended in this report. Based on our observations, suitable foundation bearing soils are expected approximately 1.5 to 3.5 feet below the existing ground surface on each lot. The depth to suitable foundation bearing soils is presented in a table in the Subsu,face Conditions section of this report. If existing fill is discovered around existing structures, it should be removed and replaced with structural fill, which is also suitable for foundation support. For residential structures, footings may be designed for an allowable foundation soil bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot (pst) including both dead and live loads. Detention vault foundations excavated into dense native till can be designed with a 6,000 psf maximum allowable soil bearing pressure. An increase of one-third may be used for short-term wind or seismic loading. Perimeter footings should be buried at least 18 inches into the surrounding soil for frost protection. However, all foundations must penetrate to the prescribed bearing stratum and no foundations should be constructed in or above loose, organic, or existing fill soils. In addition, all footings must have a minimum width of 14 inches for one-story structures, 16 inches for two-story structures, or 18 inches for three-story structures. Anticipated settlement of footings founded as recommended should be on the order of :Y.. inch or less, with differential settlement of 1/z inch or less. However, disturbed material not removed from footing trenches prior to footing placement could result in increased settlements. All footing areas should be inspected by AES! prior to placing concrete to verify that the foundation subgrades are undisturbed and construction conforms to the recommendations contained in this report. Such inspections may be required by King County. Perimeter footing drains should be provided as discussed under the section on Drainage Considerations . January 27, 2005 SGRfi11 -KE047/0A2 ·· Projl'r.td20047101KE\WP ASSOCIATED EART/1 SCIENCES, INC Page 12 e • • Martin Property King County, Washington Subsuiface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations It should be noted that the area bounded by lines extending downward at 1 H: 1 V from any footing must not intersect another footing or intersect a filled area which has not been compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM:D-1557. In addition, a I.SH: 1 V line extending down and away from any footing must not daylight because sloughing or raveling may eventually undermine the footing. Thus, footings should not be placed near the edge of steps or cuts in the bearing soils. 12.0 FLOOR SUPPORT If crawl space floors are used, an impervious moisture barrier should be provided above the soil surface within the crawl space. Slab-on-grade floors may be used over medium dense to very dense native soils, or over structural fill placed as recommended in the Site Preparation and Structural Fill sections of this report. Slab-on-grade floors should be cast atop a minimum of 4 inches of pea gravel or washed crushed rock to act as a capillary break. The floors should also be protected from dampness by covering the capillary break layer with an impervious moisture barrier at least 10 mils in thickness. Floor slabs that are supported by site soils prepared in accordance with the Site Preparation section of this report or by structural fill should experience 1/i inch or less of settlement. 13.0 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS All footing walls, basement walls, and retaining walls should be provided with a drain at the footing elevation. Drains should consist of rigid, perforated, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe surrounded by washed pea gravel. The level of the perforations in the pipe should be set at the bottom of the footing at all locations and the drain collectors should be constructed with sufficient gradient to allow gravity discharge away from the buildings. In addition, all foundation walls taller than 3 feet should be lined with a minimum 12-inch-thick washed gravel blanket provided to within 1 foot of finish grade that ties into the footing drain. Roof and surface runoff should not discharge into the footing drain system but should be handled by a separate, rigid, tightline drain. In planning, exterior grades adjacent to foundations should be sloped downward away from the structures to achieve surface drainage. These recommendations apply to conventional shallow foundation walls and landscape walls less than about 4 feet tall. One should refer to the following section for walls up to 12 feet tall . .January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC . SGLJ!s11 -KF.04710A2 -l'mjem\2()()4710\KE\WP Page 13 • • • Martin Property King County, Washington Subsuifnce Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations 14.0 CAST-IN-PLACE RETAINING WALLS AND BASEMENT WALLS All backfill behind foundation walls or around foundation units should be placed as per our recommendations for structural fill and as described in this section of the report. Horizontally backfilled walls, which are free to yield laterally at least 0.1 percent of their height, may be designed using an equivalent fluid equal to 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). Fully restrained, horizontally backfilled rigid walls that cannot yield should be designed for an equivalent fluid of 50 pcf. Walls with sloping backfill up to a maximum gradient of 2H: IV should be designed using an equivalent fluid of 55 pcf for yielding conditions or 75 pcf for fully restrained conditions. If parking areas are adjacent to walls, a surcharge equivalent to 2 feet of soil should be added to the wall height in determining lateral design forces. As required by the 2003 IBC, retaining wall design should include a seismic surcharge pressure in addition to the equivalent fluid pressures presented above. Considering the site soils and the recommended wall backfill materials, we recommend a seismic surcharge pressure of 4H and 8H psf where H is the wall height in feet, for the "active" and "at-rest" loading conditions, respectfully. The seismic surcharge should be modeled as a rectangular distribution with the resultant applied at the midpoint of the wall. The lateral pressures presented above are based on the conditions of a uniform backfill consisting of excavated on-site soils, or imported structural fill compacted to 90 percent of ASTM:D-1557. A higher degree of compaction is not recommended as this will increase the pressure acting on the walls. A lower compaction may result in settlement of the slab-on-grade or other structures supported above the walls. Thus, the compaction level is critical and must be tested by our firm during placement. Surcharges from adjacent footings or heavy construction equipment must be added to the above values. Perimeter footing drains should be provided for all retaining walls as discussed under the section on Drainage Considerations. It is imperative that proper drainage be provided so that hydrostatic pressures do not develop against the walls. This would involve installation of a minimum I-foot-wide blanket drain to within I foot of finish grade for the full wall height using imported, washed gravel against the walls. 14.1 Passive Resistance and Friction Factors Lateral loads can be resisted by friction between the foundation and the natural glacial soils or supporting structural fill soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the buried portions of the foundations. The foundations must be backfilled with structural fill compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density to achieve the passive resistance provided below. We recommend the following design parameters: January 27. 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. MJ8!111-KE047JOA2 -Pmjccts\20047/0\Kf:JWP Page 14 • • Martin Property King County, Washington • Passive equivalent fluid = 250 pcf • Coefficient of friction = 0. 35 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations The above values are allowable and include a safety factor of at least 1.5. 15.0 PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS The pavement for this project is expected to be supported by medium dense, silty sand (lodgement till), recompacted, inorganic weathered soils, or structural fill soils. These soils should be suitable, with proper preparation, to allow the use of standard paving sections. Because some of the site soils were substantially above optimum moisture content at the time of our exploration program, remedial subgrade preparation might be required below the paving. Remedial preparation measures could include removal of some of the existing site soils below the planned pavement section and restoring the planned subgrade elevation with select imported structural fill, treating the native soil subgrade with Portland cement to stabilize the wet soils, or aeration and drying of existing soils prior to compaction of the road subgrades. We recommend that the final determination of how to prepare the road subgrades be made at the time of construction when weather and field conditions are known. The King County standard paving section for residential access streets is 2 inches of Class B asphalt concrete paving (ACP) above 3 inches of A TB above 6 inches of gravel borrow. All depths given are compacted depths. All paving materials, base course materials, and placement procedures should comply with suitable standard specifications such as the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction or other suitable specifications. All structural fill and all native subgrades less than 4 feet below finished grade for a planned roadway should be compacted to 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density as determined by ASTM: D-1557. Prior to structural fill placement or to placement of base course materials over native subgrades, the area should be proof-rolled under the observation of AESI with a loaded dump truck or other suitable equipment to identify any soft or yielding areas. Any soft or yielding areas should be repaired prior to continuing work. If desired, ATB can be used to provide a construction working surface. After the buried utilities are in place, the subgrade is prepared, the gravel borrow is placed, and the ATB is laid and compacted. This ATB surface is then used for construction access, and once most of the heavy construction traffic has subsided, any damaged pavement areas are repaired prior to final surfacing with ACP. January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTII SCIENCES, INC. SGlll:m -KJ.:.'047/0,12-Pmjl'ct.rl2(XJ47JOIKE\WP Page 15 • • • Martin Property King County. Washington Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geo1echnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations 16.0 PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MONITORING At the time of this report, site grading, lot layouts, structural plans, and construction methods have not been finalized, and the recommendations presented herein are preliminary. We are available to provide additional geotechnical consultation as the project design develops and possibly changes from that upon which this report is based. We recommend that AES! perform a geotechnical review of the plans prior to final design completion. In this way, our earthwork and foundation recommendations may be properly interpreted and implemented in the design. We are also available to provide geotechnical engineering and monitoring services during construction. The integrity of the foundations for buildings and of new pavement depends on proper site preparation and construction procedures. In addition, engineering decisions may have to be made in the field in the event that variations in subsurface conditions become apparent. Construction monitoring services are not part of the current scope of work. If these services are desired, please let us know and we will prepare a cost proposal. We have enjoyed working with you on this study and are confident that these recommendations will aid in the successful completion of your projeqt. If you should have any questions or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Kirkland, Washington ~~~ Sus·;m G. Beckham, P.E. Project Engineer Attachments: Figure 1: Figure 2: Appendix: _January 2 7. 2005 Vicinity Map Site and Exploration Plan Exp lo ration Logs Laboratory Test Results SGB/sn -KE047/0,12 -Projccts\2004710\KE\WP l El(PIAII 11 /20/ O!o Kurt D. Merriman, P.E. Principal Engineer ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. Page 16 "' ~ w S2 Cl'. 0 ;::: w :::, ;;! C!) w st z< 0 u: ~ w u ,.: "' 0 0 d z z a er: a. u Kl C .; ~ u ~ C .! u .. ,,: m ~ L • w ... ~ ~ ~ • u 0 ~ ~ ~ < ,r a;' i j C 0 Well-graded gravel and ·t ro GW gravel with sand. lillle to u:: no fines " l'!" '$. o 0 o 0 "' ro > o• Poorly-graded gravel > 0"' ~.· ••• "' u U) 'vii 0~ GP and gravel witt, sand, u5 .. , av o, ••• 0 •, •o• little to no fines 0 0 •o •o• N -;fl.Z •• ••• 0 0 C • 0 • 0 z "' 0 Silly gravel and silty C cu " 0 ro " GM gravel with sand ,5 .s J ~O • 0 'O "' J3 " C ~ " .§ ~ oc " Clayey gravel and oc w ,:. ,; GC clayey gravel with sand "if'. > 0 i" "' Cl C Well-graded sand and "' C 5 0 sand with gravel, little I'! ti SW 0 i" lo no fines ::,; IL " .,, w Poorly-graded sand ro ~ ·a 0 " and sand with gravel. en 0 ·- 'O -en lillle to no lines " o.., C .,, . -§ ~ 0 oz Cl ::,; w Silty sand and " 0 ~ -SM w silly sand with .. w ro 0 ~ a.. gravel 0 0 "' w Clayey sand and 'O clayey sand with gravel C "' U) Silt. sandy sill, gravelty silt, " ML silt with sand or gravel > " u5 0 Clay al \ow to medium 0 N 0 CL plasticity; silty, sandy, or z gravelly clay, lean clay w " w w .. Organic clay or silt ol low n. e DL plasticity 0 ::,; J; Elastic silt, clayey silt, silt "" MH with micaceous .or 0 diatomaceous line sand or U) w silt :g Clay of high plasticity, U) 'O CH sandy or gravelly clay, fat " C clay with sand or gravel '§ Cl " Organic clay or silt of C u: OH medium to high plasticity Terms Describing Density Relative Density and Consistency SPT 121 blows/foot Coarse· Grained Soils Fine· Grained Soils Very Loose Loose Medium Dense Dense Very Dense Consistency Very Soft Soft Medium Stiff Stitt Very Stitt Hard Oto 4 4 to 10 (Oto30 30 to 50 >50 SPT 121blows/foot 0102 2 to4 4 to8 8 to 15 15 to 30 >30 Test Symbols G = Grain Size M = Moisture Conter1\ A = Allerberg Limits C = Chemical DD -Ory Density K = Permeability Descriptive Term Boulders Component Definitions Size Range and Sieve Number Larger than 12· Cobbles Gravel Coarse Gr~vel Fine Gravel Sand Coarse Sand Medium Sand Fine Sand Silt and Clay 3' lo 12" 3' to No. 4 (4.75 mm) 3' !o 3/4" 3/4' to No. 4 (4.75 mm) No 4 (4.75 mm) to No. 200 (0075 mm) No. 4 (4.75 mm) to No 10 !200 mm) No. 10 (2.00 mm) lo No. 40 (0.425 mm) No. 40 (0.425 mm) to No. 200 (0.075 mm) Smaller than No. 200 (0.075 mm) (J) Estimated Percentage Moisture Content Ory . Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch Slightly Moist -Perceplib1e moisture Component Percentage by Weight <5 51010 15 to 25 Trace Few Little With Sampler Type 2.0'00 Splil-Spoon Sampler (SP1] Bulk sample · Non-primary coarse constituents: > 15% · Fines contenl between 5% and 15% Moist -Damp but no visible waler Very Moist -Water visible but not free draining Wet . Visible free water, usually from below waler !able Symbols Blows/6" or portion of 6" I • " • Sampler Type Description 3.o· OD Split-Spoon Sampler 3.25" OD Split--Spoon Ring Sampler ,., Cement grou! surface seal Bentonite seal :.· Filter pack wilh :':· blank casing :-· section ·: Screened casing ."· · or Hydrolip Grab Sample 3.o· OD Thin-Watt Tube Sampler (including Shelby tube) ·: with lilt er pack :. End cap O Portion not recovered t-,,,-----"=-----------·-----------1 (l) Percentage by dry weighl C 4 ) Depth of ground water ~-~ Ul Peat. muck and other (2) (SPn Standard Penetration Test l--'--~@.!'l---t---------1 (ASTM 0-1586) l3l In General Accordance With Standard Practice for Description Y ATD = At time of drilling '5J_ Static water level (dale) .c (Q = PT .Q> e>~ Io highly organic soils and tdentincation of Soils (ASTM 0-2488) (5l Combined uses symbols used for lines between 5% and 15% Classincalions of soils in this report are based on visual field and/or laboratory observations, which include density/consistency. moisture condition, grain size, and plaslicity estimates and should not be construed lo imply field or laboratory testing unless presented herein. Visual-manual and/or laboratory classification melhods of ASTM 0-2487 and 0·2488 were used as an identification guide for lhe Unified Soil Classification System. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-..:::::::===================~.::============================ Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. FIGURE ~~~[!j~ Exploration Log Key A-1 • g t Q) 0 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-1 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, lnc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION ·--Sod a·ndTopsoil grading to loose, moist, dark brown, silty SAND, with gravel roots, cobbles and ___ _ 1 2 3 4 .. 5 6 7 8 abundant organics. TIii Medium dense, moist, gray mottled, silty SAND, with gravel, cobbles, trace boulders. Dense at 3', lightly cemented and no longer mottled. 9 Very dense below 9'. 10 · -----·--- 11 12 - 13 - 14 15 16 17 18 19 Bottom of exploration pit at depth 10 feet No ground water_ No caving. ~ ·-·-20----·--------··--·--·-------·--·--·---··-----·· ---···--··-· • i • < ~ o'. "' ;l ~ ;f, M i= Logged by: SGB Approved by: Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~f!j~ Project No. KE04710A 1112/05 • • LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-2 -----------------·-------- This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil 1 Weathered Till Loose, moist, brown, silty SAND, with gravel, roots and organics. 2 ----------------------Tili 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 .. 10 - Medium dense, moist, slightly mottled gray, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles_ Dense below 4' and lightly cemented, few boulders. Sandier below 8' . 11 --------------------------------------------------·-·-- 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Bollom of exploration pit at depth 11 feet Slow seepage from north al 5'. No caving. ~---20-------------·-···-·----·--···--------·--------·-----~---··--····--·- -Martin Property i King County, WA Logged by: SGB Approved by: Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~~~ Project No. KE04710A 1/12/05 • • g t " 0 1 2 3 4 5 - 6 7 8 9 - 10 11 12 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 17 - 18 19 - LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-3 -----------·-----,---, This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil -------Weathered Till Loose, moist, brown and dark brown, silty SAND, with gravel roots and organics. ··---·-----· Till ·---·---------------- Medium dense, moist, gray mottled, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. Dense at 4' and weakly cemented. Very dense below 8' . Bottom of exploration pit at depth 8 feet No ground water. No caving. ~-·---20---·--·----· ·-·-····-···-·----·-··----------·----·-------·-·----------·- •i~~~~~~~~~~~~-M-a-rt-in~~-r-o-pe-rt~y~~~~~~~~~~~ Ji King County, WA Logged by: SGB Approved by: Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~~~ Project No. KE0471 OA 1/12/05 • • g £ a. ID a 1 2 - LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-4 -----------------·-·------------·- This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should he read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of lime. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil Weathered Till -----------· ---- Loose to medium dense, moist, brown, silty SAND, with gravel roots and few pockets of organics and wood. 3 ----------------·--------~T;i=n· 4 5 6 Medium dense to dense, very moist, gray, silty SAND, with gravel, cobbles. 7 ---·-··---·-···-· ---· -------···--------·-·----··---·····-----· 8 - 9 10 - 11 - 12 13 - 14 15 16 17 18 19 Bottom of exploration pit at depth 7 feet Moderate seepage at 3'. Slight caving 2' to 3' . ~--·20-·--·---------··--··--------·--···----·-----·------------g -"! ~ "' i ; ;! ~ i= Logged by: SGB Approved by: Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~~~ Project No. KE04710A 1/12/05 • • g £ 0. " 0 2 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-5 ---------------·-·----------------------------· This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. {AESl) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the lime of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil · · · · ----·-------Weathered Till ------- Loose to medium dense, moist, brown, silty SAND, with gravel, trace roots and pockets of organics and wood. 3 -------------------------------Till ---- Medium dense, moist, gray mottled, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. 4 -Dense below 4', weakly cemented. 5 6 7 8 - 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Very dense and moderately cemented below 6'. Bottom of exploration pit at depth 7 feet No ground water. No caving . ~--·-20--------------------------------------------------------------------- • Martin Property ! King County, WA Logged by: SGB Approved by: Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~[!10] Project No. KE0471 OA 1/12/05 • • g ~ 0. w 0 1 2 3 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-6 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read tqgether with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurtace conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION ·----------· Sod and Topsoil Weathered Till · · Loose, moist, dark brown and brown, silty SAND, with gravel and roots and organics. ------.----·--------·-··-· Till --·----·-··-----·--·---- 4 -Medium dense, moist, gray, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. 5 6 7 Dense at 4', few boulders, sandier with depth. 8 -Very dense below 8' . 9 - 10 11 12 13 14 15 - 16 17 18 19 Bottom of exploration pit at depth 11 feet Slow seepage at 3.5'. No caving ~-2()---------------·-·---··-·-·--··--··-·--····-·-··-·---·--··--··------·--- Logged by: SGB Approved by: Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~~~ Project No. KE0471 OA 1/12/05 • LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-7 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AES1) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the locafion of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of lime. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION -·---· -------·---···-·---·--s~od and Topsoil Weathered Till 1 2 Loose to medium dense, moist, brown and dark brown, silly SAND, with gravel roots and organics. 3 ·-···-···------------·-···-· Till ·-··--·· Medium dense to dense, moist, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. 4 - 5 6 -Strongly cemented and very dense below 6'. 7 8 9 Bollom of exploralion pit at depth 8 feet No ground water. No caving. 10 11 12 - 13 14 - 15 16 17 18 19 ~ ··-· zt>· ----··-··------·-···---····---····-··-···---------· Logged by: SGB Approved by: Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~~~ Project No. KE04710A 1/12/05 • • g E :,J-o LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-8 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, lnc.·(AESI) for the named project and should be read togettier with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION --· · ----· -· Sod and Topsoil · 2 3 -----··-·--····--·-·-------··-·Tm··--··---···-·--··-··--·--··-· -- 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - 11 12 13 14 15 - 16 - 17 18 19 Medium dense, moist, brown grading to gray, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. Dense and lightly cemented below 3'. Very dense below 6'. Bottom of exploration pit at depth 8 feet No ground water. No caving. .,.~----zo-----·· ----··--·----·-·-----··-·------.. ··-·····--··----·-· ·---··---····--·----·----·-• ' C ~ ;;: " ~ ~ Logged by: SGB Approved by: Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~~~ Project No. KE04710A 1/12/05 • • g £ C. ~ 1 2 3 4 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-9 ---------------------------------------------------------- This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encoLJntered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil ------------···'• ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Medium dense to dense, very moist, gray, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. Mottled and medium dense to 4'. Dense below 4'. 5 -Trace boulders, very dense below 5'. 6 7 ---------------------------------------------------------------- 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 - 15 16 - 17 18 19 Bottom of exploration pit at depth 7 feet Slow seepage at 3'5" from south. Slight caving 2' to 5' . ~----20---------------------------------------------------------------------------• e ll ic ~ :i ;:: 6 Logged by: SGB Approved by: Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~[Jjo Project No. KE0471 OA 1/12/05 Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Date Sampled Project Project No. 12-Jan-05 Martin Property KE04710A Tested By Location EB/EP No. KWL Eps Depth Proctor Analysis ASTM D1557, D698 Soil Description Light brown silty SAND with gravel ~IP~e~rc~e:::n.:.:tLp~as=s~in~g~3:::/~4'_'s:::i=-ev:.:~~: ___ ~83% ASTM D1557 Method C ______j ___ ......:.A.:.:uc.:toc.:m.:.:ac.:tic=-T-"a:::m:.:ip:.:e:;_r __ :::]--' A Mold Number 1 2 3 Remarks ·- B Water Added field dry dry C Wt. of Wet Soil + 24.420 24.760 24.500 Mold llbl - D Wt. of Mold (lb) 14.090 14.090 14.090 - E Wt. of Wet Soil (lb) 10.330 10.670 10.410 - F Wet Density, (pcf) 137.733 142.267 138 800 G Wt: of Pan (lb) 0.735 0.735 0 660 --- H Wt. of Wet Soil + 11.075 11. 925 11.125 Pan /lbl J Wt. of Dry Soil + 9.865 10.920 10.420 Pan /lbl K Wt. of Water (lb) 1.210 1.005 0.705 M Wt. of Dry Soil (lb) 9.130 10.185 9.760 N Moisture Content 13.3 9.9 7.2 %) 0 Dry Density (pcf) 121.6 129.5 129.4 z For a 6 inch mold: Z = 0.075 For a 4" mold: Z = 0.0333 """ ----==r-Test Results: ·---··----·-----·· .. ----·-···· ._,, ________ . Optimum Moisture Percentage: 8.5 135.0 · ----··· -----1--·------·---· -----· ·-----Maximum D,:y Density: 130.0 130.0 ·--·-·--·· .... ·,.. ··-~-------·-----~ i, · ____ t -~ Correciion for oversize: ASTM 04716 'in c;::::-125 0 ---·· -----C <.> ~ Corrected Moisture Percentage: 7.0 .. C. -o -120.0 ------------Corrected Maximum D,:y Density: 135.4 c:' "O 115.0 ··------·--.-.----f---····- Assumed Specific Gravity: 2.7 110.0 -_ ... __.___._ ..... _. -.. -~--~ -· ......... j-..._ ...... _ ............ _..___.__ 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 moisture content, % • ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC . 911 Fifth Ave., Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98033 425-827-7701 FAX 425-827-5424 .. ssociated Earth Sciences, Inc. Moisture Content f] ~ Im ~ ~ ASTM D 2216 . [ te Sampled Project Project No. Soil Description 1.2/2005 Martin Propertv KE04710A rested By Location EB/EP No. !Depth F >T EP's ,ample ID. EP-1 @3' EP-2@3.5' EP-3@3' ,t Weight + Pan 2316 1730 1896 y Weight+ Pan 2057 1542 1662 'Veight of Pan 227 221 223 ,ight of Moisture 259 188 234 ,. y Weig ht of Soil 1830 1321 1439 'o Moisture 14.2 14.2 16.3 J.sa,/ .,., .. ~ •-mple ID EP-4@3' EP-5@3' EP-6 ,t Weight+ Pan 1515 1256 1498 Jry Weight+ Pan 1355 1080 1278 ·,-fPan 215 223 220 , f Moisture 160 176 220 1ry Weight of Soil 1140 857 1058 Moisture 14.0 20.5 20.8 :mplelD EP-6@4' EP-7@3.5' EP-8@3' ,et Weight+ Pan 1528 1706 1510 ry Weight + Pan 1400 1537 1336 sight of Pan 226 221 221 reight of Moisture 128 169 174 -y Weight of Soil 1174 1316 1115 Moisture 10.9 12.8 15.6 ,mple ID EP-9@2.5' et Weight + Pan 1502 ry Weight + Pan 1300 eight of Pan 202 eight of Moisture 202 y Weight of Soil 1098 Moisture 18.4 ---ASSOC/A TED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. 911 5th Ave, Suite 100 Kirkland. WA 98033 425·827 .770 I FAX 425-827-5424 3.2.2 KCRTS/RUNOFF FILES METHOD-GENERATING TIME SERIES .. . "~-· • TABLE.3.2.2.B EQUIV ALEN CE BETWEEN SCS SOIL TYPES AND KCRTS SOIL T:YPES , (. ' . ,, ; ·. ' SCS Soil Type scs KCRTS Soil Notes Hydrologic Group Soil Group . . Alderwood (AgB, Age, AgD) e Till Arents, Alderwood Material (AmB, Ame) e Till Arents, Everett Material (An) B Outwash 1 Beausite (Bee, BeD, BeF) e Till 2 Bellingham (Bh) D Till 3 Brisco! (Br) D Till 3 Buckley (Bu) D Till 4 Earlmont (Ea) D Till 3 Edgewick (Ed) e Till 3 Everett (EvB, Eve, EvD, Ewe\ A/B Outwash 1 Indianola One, lnA, lnD) A Outwash 1 Kitsap (KpB, Kpe, KpD) e Till Klaus (Kse) e Outwash 1 Neilton (Nee) A Outwash 1 Newberg (Ng) B Till 3 Nooksack (Nk) e Till 3 Norma (No) D Till .• 3 Orcas (Or) D Wetland • Oridia (Os) D Till 3 Ovall (Ove, OvD, OvF) e Till 2 Pilchuck (Pc) e Till 3 Puget (Pu) D Till 3 Puyallup (Py) B Till 3 Raanar (Rae, RaD, Rae, RaE) B Outwash 1 Renton (Re) D Till 3 Sala! (Sa) e Till 3 Sammamish (Sh) D Till 3 Seattle (Sk) D Wetland Shalcar (Sm) D Till 3 Si (Sn) e Till 3 Snohomish (So, Sr) D Till 3 Sultan (Su) e Till 3 Tukwila (Tu) D Till 3 Woodinville (Wol D Till 3 Notes: 1. Where outwash soils are saturated or underlain at shallow depth (<5 feet) by glacial till, they should be treated as till soils. 2. These are bedrock soils, but calibration of HSPF by King County DNRP shows bedrock soils to have similar hydrologic response to till soils. 3. These are alluvial soils, some of which are underlain by glacial till or have a seasonally high water table. In the absence of detailed study, these soils should be treated as till soils. 4 . Buckley soils are formed on the low-permeability Osceola mudflow. Hydrologic response is assumed to be similar to that of till soils. ' • 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 1/24/2005 3-25 • • • TopoZone -The Web's Topographic Map 0 0.3 0.6 0 .9 1.2 1.5 k m 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 !Iii Map center is UTM 10 563458E 5257030N (WGS84/NAD83) Renton quadrangle Projection is UTM Zone 10 NAD83 Datum M=18 .096 G=0.62 r.-i ,, ) JL ( \ ·1 \ . ~·::::,\ ... ·.--. ' ~'.l" -, , .. .......... \:.. -·· :;.~\ . \ ' \~ ~M /""!!' t; • ' ·- • .• F. M ;~• ,-.. ••.•. , I' ~ ":.;.1,1 .. ,· /', • = • -· \ I ! LOWER CEDAR RIVER BASIN Basin Boundary Subcatchment Boundary @ Coll ection Point ___,,. Stream 0299 Tributary Number e311s Proposed Project N 1 ,.,,., + ~ ~ ' -. 0 "" / I (\. ....... \ \ ~~ -') 0 '• 11 .:=i> / •. -; ~ L\/~ ':~ " ! -,,....,. c::::. ,...__.... '--m @ 1t~. ~ ,,_.,.il'C::::, -t ;;.p~---::::::., ~,,;;\ i ~ 70 I .~ • .....,/L/ '!~. ,!"' ., -:::.· ~ . ,~ x £_'. ~ OFFS\TE: ANAL-\/5\'5 -DRAINA~E c..o,, .. ,H=>L..AtNT M/\~ ·, ,J w :;:.. SE V) " 140TH PL a:{ st/ "° V SE 142ND ..... SE ~ 14 2ND u.J u.J :l: <ii) ~.....J V) V) ..._ :l: ;:!;O.. ~ p L _J ....J ,-.... ..._ SE~ 143 Q. Q. -.:::-~ RD ~ r= ....-i ST PL "° V V ..... ..... V) ...J ~ ~ ....J t .f:l ST FA I RWQQ[j + 'v M ~ ~ (' .. -~ .-4 ,... N 65( u.J V) _J Q. i= 0 JU") ...... (/') rn rn I . ---. vomp1a1nt Status Problem Type Rec Date PADD PADD1 , .. oo PIN ··-.... 995-0104 CLOSED H20LEVEL C Tt.ie Jan 311995 12050 148TH AVE SE 1123059087 I 1995-0472 CLOSED RUNOFF C Tue May 23 995 14007 144TH AVE SE 1523059125 2 -1995-0472 CLOSED RUNOFF RN T_ue May 30 1995 14007 144THAVE SE 1523059125 3 / 1995-0783 CLOSED VACATION C Mon Sep 4 1995 14010 134TH ST 6928000310 4 ---1995-0788 CLOSED DISCHARG C Thu Sep 21 1995 14328 128TH ST 1023059035 :5 ,/ 1995-0991 CLOSED DUMPING woe Mon Nov 20 1995 12516 142NDAVE SE 1023059281 r... _., 1996-0157 CLOSED DIGGING C Tue Feb 8 1998 12227 148TH AVE SE 1023059022 "'7 ?, 1996-0323 CLOSED WETLAND C Tue Feb 6 1996 12227 148TH AVE SE 1023059022 ~- 1996-0880 OPEN EROSION woe Thu Apr 4 1996 14328 128TH ST 1023059035 "" •' ... 19:m• 1 .. 01 CLOSED FLOG C Sun Jul 211996 128TH & 142ND A SE 1523059039 '"' ./ 1996-1771 CLOSED RUNOFF C Thu Oci 10 1996 12227 148TH AVE SE 1023059022 I/ ••• ·uuoo CLOSED FLOG C Wed Jan 1 1997 14105 133RD ST 6928000210 12 CLOSED FLOG NOA Wed Jan 29 1997 14105 133RD ST 6928000210 I~ CLOSED FLOG R Sun Jan 121997 14105 133RD ST 6928000210 14 ~ ~997-0715 CLOSED RID FENG FCR Wed Apr 2 1997 13845 131ST ST 1523059223 lS . CLOSED DRAINAGE C Tue Sep 231997 14004 133RD ST 8928000160 I,, 1 . LOSED DRAINAGE R Tue Sep 301997 14004 133RD ST 6928000160 11 1997-1380 CLOSED DRAINAGE C Tue Sep 231997 14005 133RD ST 692800017( I~ • I Ml97-1625 J OPEN BMP'S WQA rue Dec 30 1997 1441, 128TH ST 847100016 I"> 1- CLOSED POND FCR Sun Ja-n 4 1998. 13907 149TH PL SE 1072030540 :;!. 0 -1, ( LOSED DRAINAGE C Thu May 21 1998 1445< 132ND ST 847100054 2. f LOSED DITCH FCR Tue Aug 4 1998 1400( 142ND ST 1072030540 2 . CLOSED WQI WQR MOn Aug 17 1998 13224 144THAVE SE 847100073 z I ) vLOSED WASHWATE wac Sun Aug 9 1998 13224 144TH AVE SE 847100073 z. 11;n:t9-0015 CLOSED DRAINAGE R Tue Jan 5 1999 1401, 133RD ST 6928000180 2..5 CLOS"",..,. r>.t('!_r"I .... FCR Mon Mar 1 1999 14102 148TH PL SE 1072010510 ?1~ ft 1999-0202 CLOSED DRAINAGE CL ) Sun Mar 7 1999 14004 133RD ST 6928000160 :Z.1 "7 ,s99-0609 J CLO~cu CONSTRUC " Mon Aug 181999 146\J! 136TH ST 847100100 -1999-0625 CLOSED STND H20 C Sun Aug 22° 1~99 13741 148TH PL SE 1012030440 :;..~ .... 2000-0597 CLOSED DCA C Mon Aug.28 2000 1410( 132ND ST' 1523059217 ~ --!000-0763 CLOSED MNM FCR Mon Nov_ 20 2000 1400. 133RDST 6928000160 ::31 DOM FCR Mon Jan· 22 2001 14005 149TH PL SE 1072030540 3 (I 2001-0697 OPEN -DOM C tUEtNov 1:i 2001 13309 148TH AVE SE 847100071 :3- !CLOSED MMF FCR Wed Dec 12 2001 14005 149TH PL 1072030540 -;., CLOSED MMF R Sun Dec 23 2001 14005 149TH PL 1072030540 'J C 2002-0126 CLOSED Wed.Feb 20 2002 14012 133RD ST 6928000150 ;:1(., . ..-~ ., __ Mon Aug 2002 14019 145TH AVE •• 5104200520 3"1 2002 0899 CLOSED WQD WOR Thu Sep 5 2002 14019 145TH AVE 68 5104200520 :;e -·-CLOSED MNM FCR Tue Feb 4 2003 14.00f 149TH PL se 1072030540 I ( 2003-0359 '°LOSED woo wac Sun May 18 2003 14005 149TH PL se. 1072030540 I-to 2003-0359 / OPEN woo WOE Wed May 21 2003 1400! 149TH PL se 1072030540 11 ?00S-LU14S CLOSED MNM FCR Tue Nov 18 2003 14920 139TH PL 1072030540 • -Page I of I ... d Torkelson, Cindy e From: Rebecca Cushman [rcushman@TriadAssoc.com] Tuesday, August 16, 20051:54 PM • • -;,-... Sent: To: Torkelson, Cindy Cc: Kristen Anderson Subject: drainage complaints Attachments: consolidated list 8_ 16_05xls.xls Cindy, How have you been? I have not talked to you in some time. I have another new project that we are doing a downstream analysis on. Enclosed is the list of complaints off of I- map that I determined may be downstream of the site: Would you please pull these complaints and send them to me? Please let me know an estimated time frame. Thanks much! Hope your summer is going well. Sincerely, Rebecca Cushman, PE I Project Engineer Triad Associates· 12112 115th Ave NE>> New Address Kirklanc!, WA 98034 P: 425.821.8448 F: 425.821.3481 E: crush,nan@trladassoc.com W: www_.trladassoc.com Comrnemornting 30 years of land development consulting 08/16/2005 • • King County Water and Land Resources (WLR) Division 20 I S Jackson St, Suite 600 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 FAX Fax: ------------Phone: ----------- Date: K,119/cs Number of pages· including cover sheet: --- From: Cindy Torkelson WLR Stormwater Services Section Phone:206-296-1900 Fax Number: 206-296-0192 IMPORTANT LEVEL 1 ANALYSIS NOTE,; We do not send copies of certain complaint types that are not relevant such a~BCW, FI, FIR, FIH and WQA, and we do not send CL and LS types. See key below. Type SI, S2 and S3 will not be faxed due to size constrains"/ J."1 {},Ai_, ~ t--~ ~ 1911-t}c)o~ .-~d' · 9'!b-0 11117-lbJS' 'µXJ/-(%;97 -t-~3-C>~9 0/(,t.,~~d- The following is a list of complaint.types received by the Water and Land ~esources Stormwater Services Section. Complaint numbers beginning prior to I 990-XXXX have been archived and are no longer in our possession. They can still be retrieved, if necessary, but will take additional time and may not be beneficial to your research due to their age, development which bas occurred, etc. If you are interested in reviewing the actual complaints, they can be pulled (time permitting) for your review. Copies can be obtained for$ .15 per page, and $2.00 per page for plans. Keys: Type.of Investigation C Action Request BCW Business' for Clean Water CCF Response to Inquiry · •ct Claim EH Enforcement on Hold ER Enforcement Review FCC,FCR,FCS Facility Complaints Fl SWM Fee Inquiry Fffi SWM Fee Review FIH SWM Fee on Hold '1.'l RR NDA WQC WQE WQR WQA WQO Sl,S2,SNJ Lawsuit Facility Engineering Review Neighborhood Drainage Assistance Water QuaJity C9mplaint Water Quality Enforcement Water Quality Engineering Review Water Quality Audit Water Quality-Other Engineering Studies .Type of Problem DCA DDM DES DLE DTA INQ MMA MMF . •·MMG ,:: 'MNW .SWF. ·WQB WQD WQI REM NWD GRT Development/Construction Drainage -Miscellaneous Drainage -Erosion/Sedimentation Drainage -Landslide/Earth Movement Drainage Technical Assistance Drainage -General Inquiry Maintenance -Aesthetics Maintenance -Flooding Maintenance -General Maintenance -Mowing MIUntenance -Needs Maintenance Maintenance-Noxious Weeds SWM Fee Questions Water Quality-Best Management Practices Water Quality-Dumping Water Quality-Illicit Connection SWM Fee -Remeasurement SWM Fee-Grant SWM Fee-New Discount •Subject to Public Disclo~ure requirc_ments l. Receipt of written request for documents 2. Review and approval by Prosecuting Attorney's office -KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT Type _:;(Z_--'-- Flle No. 95-0104 (._ ' .elved by: f.J.. . Page 1: INVESTIGATION REQUEST 14 Date: 2/, /q $ OK'd by: ·---------------'-------------- Received from: NAME: fh/mtgt/16-f, /l/Cl(7 ADDRESS: /J..050 I '18 ..,-;., AV£ Location of problem, If different: Reported Problem: (Please print plainly for scanning). (Day) J :.t, . PHONE 2 7/-7/Z'"/ (Eve) P46£R 37'0· 76.9 / 5£ City ££ /I/TON State __ Zip. ___ _ /)J,f. llolm'?u/s f /s <!.-~'nc.ernecl aho,,,:t +he ,· n crea. Se-in +he. wa..t-er +a.Joie, nea.r his lot, The 10+ direc+ly S:,u,+h has a I c:,..Ke, f:orrnlr"><j on. ,' +, and +he '(etc.an+ Lo+ b-ehi0d h,m 1S Sa.+l-ifa.+ea'. C.a.ri we help rnR Hotrnq,ufst w,'+h h'.·s r,ei h/x,,s , who.+ are Co<.,U,f;y r~<..<.lo.+1ons on 9e+rec+in3ar,ei9hbor'.s kJo..+er ;eve/?' >10.con+ Lo+ • "'//230S 96"5 ow~ci by l<obu"+ An::lerso..J e Plat name: Other agencies Involved: .UO holM4... 4,.,,~ Alc:.-t.1,,;"''t.· Le<'~ M.•~cs .._ ~ -1.> «,.\\ z.,1..14, 2· 'r, ]·IC, 2.-~ Lot No: Block No: No Field Investigation Needed __ _ {lnltla/s) ml,trii1:;:n1:iaitt~itlt!ffi114lffi91!!S~MflYm1§Yft?!Mfil~B:rllrti@JAML~m4:l!~tJ!illlf"~rJ!$it~Il,.i!ilt . 5t.J _I_I _ 2..Z, -2._ Parcel No.11230!5 9087 Kroll 806w 1/4 S T R Basin H/tY Council Dist 12. Charge No: ____ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notified on ?-/J-1J-by L phone_ letter _ In person ..,.er Co.Uc.I-1-'t,-/./o(,.,~,__a;_f ~ i".{h'"'t i,.;.._,1k+ Sw"'-d.o~k·J '-'......_ ~ V"C.~vk.\..:c,~_,. c.-'o~~+- ~vz,v...J.~ " ..,,.,.1:;,~ "'c.i.3"~-..< ...... ~ pu....1.:rr ... ...__ Sc.-,.,.l :r ,.._,..,Vy_ (..~ f--:+ "'"Y"'.Jc..... .q,.,_~ \J I O \c,..J.,o "~ . C. ke<. 1-.cJ-1:> l:>£ S c,..,J t L.... "-' "'-•j I, j,,,r -lo ./l... =f J..,..,.d. c... '() ,-,:..J.; u ;l'.)\v--\-io"' +c"'7 t.,.,"1' l')C.hs-.:d. IZ-Z.W-14 k.v Ko"' ~=I~ Cu..ll"<tl M• i-lc,h ... 2,..,,s-f J,,,..,_{, ....,,'#_.. ~ ..... ,,<A'l:.:::i:::) _ ,,_ ,os.<=d' rvf. ?~4-Z-1!; -<;:,"'-;,.J.:c-11- DISPOSITJON: Turned to on by OR: No further action recommended because: Lead agency has been notified: -.Problem has been corrected. -==..,.N.,..o_p_r....,ob""le_m....,..h-as_b,..e_e_n..,.ld.,..e-nt"'lfi,...1ed...,..-----.P=-r,...io-r ,...ln-ve_s...,.tlg-a-.ti-on-ad..,.d.,..r-es-s-es_p_r-oblem: • -See File# rlvate problem -NDAP will.not consider because: · . ------ -Water originates onslte and/or on neighboring parcel .£. Other (Specify): f7~Jvi)~ · _ Location Is outside SWM Se,;,.,yea. DATE CLOSED: .J!_; / S(,U. ·.?Y: .:£,/ .··.·,'."f.; "/t1171&J6 • • • Complaint #95-0104 Holmquist Investigated by Doug Dobkins ... --.. --· ·-, -· ~-·---· .. ,. {i) Mr. Holmquist is concerned about the groundwater table around his house. Holmquist's neighbor to the south has standing water in the pasture/front yard (see picture ). The neighbor to the North of Holmquist has some standing water on his driveway area. This neighbor has a small V-ditch along the north property line ofHolmquist that picks up surface flows and drains them to the roadside ditch. Area around the Holmquist property. was damp on the day of investigation. I recommend that I contact Mr. ·Holmquist to inform him that SWM doesn't have any programs or regulations to deal with groundwater. 148TH AVE SE D •• -.. -... v.i:iireH, . -.. ·--------- KING COUNlY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT Page 1: INVESTIGATION 'REQUEST p-/s) Type C. Date: 5/2'-I /C/S . OK'd by: FIie No .. q 5-D'i ?:Z. . .. Received from: Fm (Please print plalnly.for scanning). (Day) (Eve) NAME: __ _,c;[.,_r..,..4-"'z"";e""-,_,__.O""-'-'a'-'-/)"------'----------PHONE 2.7 /-'1279 - ADDRESS: / 'i 60 7 City R.£.NTC>r-J State __ Zip ___ _ Location of problem, n dffferent: Reported Problem: £i-ces.s/Vc rwnoFf' ('n:,tVJ Sf-re<!:.:t. Re.Pe,;--tb o. ·H-ci.ched P rn c.c,mp fa..i "+ . • Plat name: Other agencies Involved: sE .J2. 23 __£_ Parcel No. J 5 2305 9 I z5 1/4 S T R Basin /-C.R. ·Council Dist 12 Charge No: Lot No: Block No: ~-. No _Field Investigation Needed __ _ Kroll 810 E. Th.Bros: New 65{. J'3 Old 3SP{. RESPONSE: Citizen notifled ori (>~1-, 1by I/ phone _ letter _ In person ;-15>11--RN. ~ ;~...._,,. c,.,._;f ...,f ~-, .,J~ .. rcr. &.r .r. DISPOSITION: Turned to· Won z,. -;/~7?by ~ OR: No further action recommended because Lead agency has been notified: , . -Problem has been corrected. --..,.N.,..o-p-r"'"'ob'"'"le_m__,..h .... as_b,..e_e_n..,.ld~e-n-'-tn-led-. ----P-r-io-r -ln-ve-s-tl-ga_t_lo_n_a-dd_r_e-ss_e_s -pr-oblem: A . -. -~~# WPrivate problem -NDAP w/11 not consider because: ------ Water originates onslte and/or on neighboring parcel -Location Is outside SWM Service Area. DA TE CLOSED: __%.__j ....:i_J '7 S-· by: ~ X Other (Specify): l'lfo//tl>8' TcC-ff. t'M.;/Sl;f, -- • . Detalls of Investigation: On site 5-25-95. KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT Page 2: FIELD INVESTIGATION _: The Frazier lot is a corner lot below road grade and lower than the lot to the south. Bordering roads are shoulder type without ditches. Run off is to the Frazier's gravelled driveway. Mr Frazier is not looking so much for County assistance as he is wanting to know what he can do on his own property to keep the water from ponding in the driveway. Photo 1) Looks across 144th at house (left) and garage. 2) Looks north on 144th from frcint of driveway. 3) Looks south in front of lot. 4) View west on 140th with Frazier lot on left. 5) Looks east on 140th. with Frazier lot behind maple bush on right . • Sketch: • f. l, . > ·' ' Investigated by ~'¥:,tC /k,.61 - f ,..-/ Date _-<;:S_--.:c~...:.1_--'9_J __ • • • EMORANDUM DATE: Au 7, 1995 TO: file FROM: Gary-Paul Reinke Engineer, DIR RE: File #95-0472 ( 95-0472BJ CC: Brian Sleight, P.E Brian, This is similar to the Riordan file I just sent to you. I haven't filled out a score sheet prior to this but have included one with this. The letter and information has gone out. This compl.aint was a request for technical assistance, not for a fix. I feel we can close this out right away.· I will pass along Tony Ledbettor's phone number to Mr. Frazier . Brian, I have talked to Mr. Frazier concerning his questions on this complaint just this last week. He is satisfied with our assistance at this time. He is planning some work in his yard first and if this does not stop the flooding· in the driveway he will contact Tony Ledbetter about what he might be able to do to stop the water in the right-of-way. I feel we can close this out at this time. Gary ---(4) • KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER.MANAGEMENT DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT . • Page 1: INVESTIGATION RE OU EST · · Type V Date: Cf/6/q5 OK'dbL.------'~JAAJ FileNo.q0-07/p?J Received by: ------------------------------------. -------___________________ ,_: ______________________ ------~=J[_'1_ ______________________ ---------- Received from: (Please print plainly for scanning}. (Day) (Eve) NAME: _ ___,,])"--=ljYl'----'-""'-b-'J"O'-S-'/C-"-'--/ ,_J _a/. __ rr_· _ed. ______ PHONE _____ ---- ADDRESS: / ,f O / 0 SC-/3 'f 'fn sr. City /<-tn-hrn State . Zip '14t2S} Location of problem, rt different: { {Jov-hfrns ()f It/() th JWe s IE.) . . . ------------------------------------------------------------------:1--------------------------------· Reported Problem: . · St::£ ~~A?y • 8e.,£re__ rnue.s-f1,3crl-1~ I"·' ''-3/ _,._,, 1,v. ?arcsl :,a. (pq;;;i f OO D :3/ {) Kroll ff/() E,, ---------- Basint-C I<_ Council Dist./ :2., Charge No: -~-------------------------------·-··---- Slack i'!o: ,h.';rcs: New~ 5&J-/ ~ Gld 3'5D5 RESPONSE: -Cte Crtizen notrtied on o/:-22~ffoy C b;.,etf :J:Z;_~ .s~ f- phone letter in person 1o-r~t;---~~ ~ ~~ DISPOSITION: Turned to on by -----------OR: No further action recommended beca1 Lead agency has been notrtied: ---'---------------~----.,..---ccc--'-----::-:-::- a-. Problem has been corrected, No problem has been identified. Prior inves1igation addresses proble W-See File #. · Pri-1a;e problem -NDAP will not consider because: -Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel = Location i.s outside SWM Se~A~ja. _ Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED: _i!}__; / 5' / J 5 by _/l!'v //1/rtJ /?£.t>u/~cib _, __ . //! ~./, -.. ---------------~-----------------------------. -·-··-----·-- • • • complaint 95-0763 Dembroski, Alfred investigated by Doug Dobkins on 9-18-95 Mr. Dembroski is requesting to vacate some ROW along 140th avenue SE. The area in question is unopened ROW and not maintained. The only drainage that I could find was at the end of SE 132nd avenue which crossed the 140th Ave. SE ROW from the west to the east. This is a 12"concrete pipe. No other pipes or drainage systems were found in this ROW. Drainage within the plat of Puget Colony Homes drains away from the 140th avenue southeast right-of-way to the southeast. On the westside of the 140th Ave se ROW there are 4 large parcels which have no drainage systems affected by this proposed vacation of ROW. Right of Way isn't improved for travel. see attached drawing (1-) KING COUNn' SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION C?) , DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT ~6 • . Page 1: INVESTIGATION REQUEST Type --- Received by:M Date:.: 'f/,;;.;;i./q5 OK'd by: ...AA.. A File No. q5.()788 -·---------------------------------------------------0---------------------------------------j_J_-::J ________________ _: ________________ _ Received from: (Please print plainly for scanning). (Day)~ /: 30 (Eve) NAME: _ __.Vi'-.J.1-'-~"'-f.q_,__i'-'-n_:_;"'""t)<.)=---ltl--'-e-_G_· _t.._12_0_,_y_·____ PHONE ,;;2 so -/34-2:..·_ · __ _ / 11'22 Q 'f1i O 1-. 4'3Z -33.3~ ADDRESS:. ___ ._'T-'---"-:..,_._o=-------=S~f=-__ , 2_8_____ City f(,{:11-n; n . State __ Zip q,g(Jf)' 'Joi," Mt. r,, l.e . Location of problem, if different: -------------···---------····----------····--------------------·-· ---------------·------·-·····--------------------- Reported Problem: --1)1/LS. v1VJC-£ l£ty' ~l1S pnJP-<:.r-1-y ~ ,,f-e;,.:/s ;/--/1Uf' -m CU?d £/du-IC( ULCU(, h-e.L !1.)..e.1qhi:»rs 7P --(he. tJtv#I ho.ti lit5-/-c..l(~ .;;2. .L./" '])rt,ttn pip-?5 whibh disdic.v-qc.5 ~Id heY fltfPeJ/hj.-'1nUf crWYl ~ doq /::0717-l/ Mti f.ti../.e,/l/ sh~ !>us nt,-hcec{ P... 1:/lm lf SC1vb!>; Crrn·.,-nq J:vt;m -/11e.. pip-t-. :she. wovJd {,).)a -this k,;.i.cd lo s~ tJnt'1.-I-1- 16, r;vr,_ d /)(7 $ ~ i b I l.f so Jrl,.{_ .fh ,' J1 q d 611 e. ahrt,vl--rt, ; S-A ClrJ 17)1-/o J,~ PHf ~1'1 711~ . !l.fp.e ~s Coco.kcl t)..lcrnq -111~ p%PllJ4 !/11.e_. tJ')1 Ifie NOv-WI c,Jde., 1 al-!Jo,fkr,n., 01 miclclf~ tJ/,-knee p._btrt,t.:/ t;c,o fr baci::. -Pf-ease p(o nof- llfit../11-cr h~ 1<.ai.:1-e.e. , ~h-c. Atts-·. camce.e. ;;: l/tn,t n~at lo lf{lv< Ca.I'! ca..L/ ~.es . rn e, IE c eo If • s n e fuA 5' c..! ~~ti-s-,wn <! o? ..fN 8 n< s A ,:u.,..,CU/ s-o '1lM C c,..,r... S-e~ i-1-fu..tl-uz., lu.£ · ,,Je .. iq{., bOV 1<.,ec ... ~nfl(f Pu:!-~ b{),t,.rlf'/ pvvz_ ripe. ",_/.: s T .~ Le~ /'~o: Kroll 805£ 31ock No: '.::'1~.,t.,t. ,h3ros Nev: (p 5/p:{j Old 3 '5 DJ/-- Basin L GI<_ Cccmsil Dist / 2---Charga No: -----------------------------------=----=--.- DISPOSITION: Turned to on by -----------OR: No further action recommended beec _ Lead agency has been notiiied: --,.,---,.,--~---~--------------~ Pro. blem ha.s been corrected, _ No problem has been identified. Prior investigation addresses prob! W -See File# ____ _ _ Pnvate problem -NDAP will not considei because: _ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel _ Location. i.s outside SWM 83l)ervice Are . DATE CLOSED: /0 / /2,.; 9S by: ------,uof7~-,6 _ Other (Speciiy): KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION· REPORT • . . . . Page 1: INVESTIGATION REQUEST . . Type wQC.. Received_ by: J: L.. ---------------------------------Date: 1//z,t / <;!5 _____ OK'd by:----------------------File No _q5-Q_C/Cf L Received from: (Please print plainly for scanning). (Day) (Eve) , (Ylob:I NAME: /I-el.son, 15;°;; d C'@IZOu PHONE 255-6721 er C/91-3,Ec ADDRESS /J6/ 6 /'-/2,-d /ttJt: 5E City !(e_;?f-on State Zip98Q6li • Location of l?roblem, if different: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reported Problem: • !?JR. Ale/Sc>n ':s (')e}ghbo, ; 5 accus,'n3 h \ rY\ of d.u.,n f' l 0:f ?U'li ((\ol 10 a.. '5 +-e... ()ea.I -the d.r-a..•r\ a..ge_ ctfect, C.o..n u..'.)e... CC>r(I.L. DL.d OJ\O. CY\£. uZ +or St _g Y\S of d l,l)VI p -i~ , a..n. d -ta\ K "t'O n, s rw~f1b0(" : ~:ca ,,c.11,:::. Lot No: 1 . 31ock No 77&:£1, Oiha:-2gencias i;ivo:ved: t-Jo Field Jnves:igstion Needed --- (:."1/:,tc,~: tt:0.ttttt:{t:tt:~t,;:;::::·.tttr:tticZ;~:tt<-:,::.t:IP_-:.~.·-~:;qgf:1.~bs:-:'.-.. ~-It~Yrf9JiJ~ ,l?.}h~T:l\5 Q,2..~:~t.i.1 . .-·.~-±£ .. ~:/\::t.J:t//t/ft.;>:\t\t:;tf ,:,;::::,/;,f :~}jf/;\: SE. /0 Z3__ 5 ?ari:slNo. /t)Z305 q?.g"/ Kroll ----s T Basin LC/<_ Council Dist / Z-Charge No: -------------------------------- RESPONSE: Citizen notiiied on by ---phone let1er · in person Th. 3ros: New &>5l>J { Old 35 Di D15_POSITION: Turned to on by OR: No further action recommended beca, ----------- . _ Lead agency has been notified: • Prob! em has been corrected, -&...,.... . .,.N.,..o-p-.r-o.,..b~le-m~h~a-s~b-e_e_n-,-id.,..e-n~ti.,..f ie-d.,... ----~P~r.,..io_r.,..in-v-es_t.,..ig_a.,.tio-n-ad7 o.,..· r-es_s_e_s -p-ro'ble See File# _____ _ _ Priva,e problem -NDAP will not consider because: Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel -Location is out;ide ·swM Service Area. _ Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED: [:J.. /Q_{_/ 7. 5 by: ~J.: -_jj_\ r{o (A!M /uc/1.fT • ' • • Date: December I, 1995 Date of Investigation: November 30, 12995 FM: Gary-Paul Reinke RE: Evaluation for Complaint# 95-0991 The Nelsons neighbor (McTies) is claiming they are dumping animal waste from their dogs and from their dog grooming business into a drain system which eventually empties on the McTies property. The · Nelsons have an easment through the neighboring property directly east of them. This neighbor raises dogs and has two horses on the property. I checked the Nelsons' drainage system (roof drains) and found them to be clear and clear. We walked to the outfall near the McTies property. Mr. Nelson's system ends in a dry well that has a rock wall on the side the water would empty on. Although it was raining hard at the time of the visit there was no moving water coming from the drywell. The pond on the McTies' property sits in the middle of a low spot, so water would collect there naturally. The health department was out recently and did not find any evidence of animal waste from the Nelson system. This appears to be bad relations between the neighbors. I did not find any violations and closed the complaint onsite. I asked Mr. Nelson to send a sketch and history of his problem with the McTies for the file. He said he would send it in. Drain Dog pens cleanout (if') Ponded area Horse barn KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT - ."""" '' 11 '-0____ __ _ _ _ ::::, _•_:'/~'/~':o~::s~ __ ,;,~ "' ~'~ · / ~]_- Received from: Kick::.. T1'\ 0 Y'v\ \D r.ciN(Please prinl plainly Jar scanning). (Day) (Eve) NAME: __ -'l,_r'-'-N---'A--'W'-"-'t1..'-'-'l'-'t-o'-"'-f\J_,__ ________ PHONE ZS 15 -D 19 3~-- AooREss: __ 1_z_2_2._-=r ___ ~--1 Lf~s_m_, ___:_:W\/c_c_:::E-:__<;".::;_c_£_ City. R l,/1.lTl>N State Zi/liD:f . Location of problem, if different: Reported Problem: ---'SE.-€-# ~ 41f12.S s N~-3 l-.bov 1s b t:i..cL hDe . ~Is u.JQ_+-1~.- . . ~5:JIVl'.J tN ~ I'=' he.I ~ ·ev-e.ol +o Lo: No: Slack No: ?arcel tfo. /01.. 30'5 C/()'lZ. --'-----------Kro:1 805 e, ,h 3ros Nev: 02(p.J"i "i ii Basin f,..C/2_. o:d {p 2 7:/ 4-:. 34-D<t -~---------- Council Dist (.p Charge No: ':5 ?j:_ l=-L ______________ ----_-_ _____ _ __ a D , RESPONSE: Citizen notified on 2·2$ft. by + phone _ letter _-in person -, le-Cl-~-W +4> i..Jt,u/J ·J,c_ :S-o,,4 +D ~..L d ~· '4- ~Ao 0,oW...:..... s~ A~ z.-z..1-~'=-+o ~)::,es. ~ DISPOSITION: Turned to on by -----------0?.: No further action recornr.ier,ded_ bee: (\ Lead agency has been n·otified: __:!::/):....!)~~,,,__5~_,,,,G£.£~=1~.l-d:_,c_,:2<;:'=--~------=-,---,---,----,------,--,-'----. Problem has been corrected, _ No problem hes been identified. Prior investigation addresses prob See File# ____ _ Privare problem· NDAP will not consider because: -. . _ Water originaies onsite and/or on neighboring parcel _ Location_ i_s outside SWM Se':)t?· _ Other (Specify): DAT,C: CLOSED: A'/ ,?5};__2!{ by: /RJ/JP&-::f"b,e~('f; • complaint 96-0157 Walton, Tina Investigated by Doug Dobkins on 2-21-96 ( ct) I met with Mr. Walton onsite to discuss his concerns with the work being done on the nursery property to the south. According to Mr. Walton the nursery has been clearing land that could be considered a wetland. I walked the back property line of Mr, Walton's property and discovered that he also has done some work in the wetland to install a fence. Mr. Walton cleared in the wetland and disturbed a small stream. I told .Mr. Walton that he needs to talk to DOES Grading section about a permit to do this work and to stop work in the wetland. I tried to access the property of the nursery to the south but was unsuccessful because they were closed. The nursery appears to have encroached the wetland with its clearing. I suggest sending this complaint to DOES Grading section for their investigation . ..::> C... I U -c:'. ..j -!:) SCALE I" -100' SSOR - _____ NE.I 0-23-5 N.aa-1 S1w.------'----- ~ ~ " .. ~ ,, . ~ ~ (01 -------= --\----------------------- • l : ,.,.,.J.. ~ 8 ~ : ,i ! '"' z_,1-r,. .,. @) ~ ------- -· ----.-- • ------~-= ... --~·="'="''---- ~ ; ... ~"'· ~ .,_!!) :__~·~ H -,r ~I I ·1 1· : . ~· ~w ,. I . ,. A( ... ,.,: > --------------·------~ -. §: I _J~i) J _.~ ~ --_________ u··• ~" -·---· ···--· --·· '""'-'· ?•' ,,_.,_ / ~;;: . ~ ! ~ ,--...---!i ;; ~\ ,,.,.. ·1 . -~ .. ,:~ ~ .... ----------"'~ ,--,,. _ _3.?J 1 ~[U~ ,,~ ii ' . .,· ,.,., ... -KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION 1/.,r~\ DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT l v) - · /"/l '"'· 'M ,,.J, , f Page 1: INVESTIGATION REQUEST . Type (2... . -· . lT"nlflloU/ .. ,C0/11,-<aill · :.A,J eceived by: /?Id 71zompso~ot//ne) Date: .. ?J.J/94 ____ OK'd by:· -~_1(tSJ _____ File No .. ·· 9&-3 :)3 _ Received from: .. (Please print plainly for s.cannirig). (Day) (Eve) NAME: 7-Zoa uJalton .PHONE ao:5-083 --- ADDRcSS: //);:JJ 7 -/~th /J(!e tit City. ~ State Zip f .f'.1: loe2tion of problem, if different: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- She • La: No: 31ock No: Olha:-c.gancias bvo)ved: t~o Field lr.vesiig:.tion Needed __ _ s ' ;; a2sin /JJa (/ /. i'arcsl No. /02/10/i" -9{)ck{ Kroll 80/ff:.. Council Dist / .2, Charge .No: --------------------- RESPONSE: Citizen notified on by ----phone Jen er in person ,n3ros: Nev:·~:l7fl? O:d 35-£1 DISPOSITION: Turned to on by OR: No further action recommended bee, ------------- _ Lead agency has been notified: ------------------------~-'--- .- Problem has been. corrected, . _Nop. rob.lem has been identified. Prior investigation.addresses probl -Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: _ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel Location is outside SWM Service Area. -See File# _· O,her (Specify): DATE CLOSED: _g_;~}j_j 'j~ by:~ s~ 9t,-.0/57 ------ __ .. ,... KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION J)C}) DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT (io) ;-- Page 1: INVESTIGATION'REQUEST Type --'V"--- ._ec_e_ive_d_b_y: __________ _?.ate: 7 /22~/~q_4,~_o_K_'d_b_y:--~-~ File No. q6 -/ L./0/ (Day) 7p3!'6 (Eve) Received from: (Please print plainly for scanning). PHONE ,;277-tJ.5"3/ __ _ City State Zip ------------- Basin L<:.R., Council Dist / Z.. Charge No: ____ _ RESPONSE: C~izen notified on -~-by . _ phone _ letter _ in person DISPOSITION: Turned to on by -----------OR: No further action recommended beec _ Lead agency has been notified: --~-~___,--,-----,-,--.:;--;---~--=--,-----,-------:,--,,:-----,-,---- • Problem has be.en corrected. _ No problem has been identified. Prior Investigation addresses probi -See File# ------Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: Water originates onslte and/or on neighboring parcel . = Location Is outside SWM Serv5,e, ~r;-a. · DATE CLOSED: _3_; 'f / ~ by: .....-fr../ ---fftJ5fGtP Other (Specify): • • TO: FROM: DATE: · · · · • • • a.:i.LvM 3:::>v..i 8 ns -· ~'-' -AfNno:::i 8 Ni>1 KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT INTERNAL MEMORANDUM Don Althauser Larry Gettle August 7, 1996 (io) SUBJECT: James Montgomery -Amonte Florist 96-1401 , .. 4801 NE 4th (142nd Avenue Southeast and Southeast 128th street) Per your request Local Drainage Services Unit inspected the drainage channel from the pipe outlet at southeast 128th street to the South Lobe of Wetland 150. We also checked to determine if there are easements or agreements that require the county to maintain this off R/W channel. our investigation revealed the channel south of Southeast 128th street has been impacted with sediment, vegetation and debris. The channel invert appears to be higher than the culvert outlet. we determined at least 40 feet of channel dredging would be required to obtain positive flow. FUrther downstream a significant amount of brush and trees are restricting the channel and causing additional sediment building: A check for easements at the Record center and Property services Division did not identify any easements or agreements giving King County maintenance responsibility for this channel. Because we do not have maintenance responsibility this maintenance should be considered as part of the CIP project. Thanks for the opportunity to respond to your request. If you have any questions or need additional information please feel free'to call me at 6-8326. ' • KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT {_11) Page 1; INVESTIGATION "REQUEST . ~ate: /0'/) 7/tt OK'd by:.~ FIie No. Type (! 7t'rfV/ lease print plainly for scanning). (Day) (Eve) NAME: ,JO ti N ( \;:\~ 1 (9-1..1 Z l.Ml. !g..,:H PHONE 54 -q 7 OCl ----- ADDRESS: I 2,. 2 2 7 . 14 B fti v(.J I:; > c:;; City t<e,-...rrc N State cJ It Zip )'. f a5'" 5 Location of problem, If different: Plat name: Other agencies Involved: Parcel No. --------------1/4 S T R Basin Council Dist Charge No: Lot No: Block No: No_Fleld Investigation Needed __ _ Kroll ---Th.Bros: .,_,N:,,;ew"----- Old RESPONSE: Citizen notified, on~ by ....JtL phone_ letter _ In person Lu..(~ <-D~ (~a,vt.v.J -lo c.J~ -e.. _(>~ k -b "t)t)E 5 . 6-cw. ~ Cr le.. fc.. Ct-,...,'.J -=# t Evi ~ -f/-; . - DISPOSITION: Turned to . on . by -----------OR: No further action recommended because: .:{_ Lead agency has been notified: t)Dt:,--::, >IT{£ ~(S2.e/Jt1~Af"T .s:..n///cc{3 oblem has been corrected. _ No problem has been Identified. _ Prior Investigation addresses problem: _ vale problem • NDAP will not consider because: _ Water originates onslte and/or on neighboring parcel _. Location Is outside SWM Serv~jA::J. See Ale# • · _. _ Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED: _Jj_; .Qlj .1f_ by:~ 11R)--rrJ'v965 King County Department of Natural Resources · Surface Water Management DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT 1/IELD INVl!STIGATION FILE NO 96-1771 NAME: JOHN KAUZLARICH ADDRESS: 12227 148'111 A VE SE PHONE 454-9700 MAINTENANCE 4 THOMAS PAOE627n DATE 10-25-96 INfTIAl.8 DCD (11) DETAILS OF INVESTIGATION: Dave Kauzlarich is the son of the property owners. Dave is concerned that the property has been damaged with all the activity at the nursery to the south and the neighbors to the north of them. A wetland now exists on the backside of the property. Dave feels with all the. activity of the · other propeties they are now the dumping ground for all the surface water flows. I walked the pasture on the backside of the property and found the wetland Dave was talking about but could not find a direct flow path of the water from the nursery or the north property. it appears the water ponds on the Kauzlarich's property than flows to the north. I will check the sensitive areas maps to find out what is located on the backside of this propety . . SKETCH: • I NURSERY • 148THAVESE . cv 'DQZ/13) Type V 97-55 Received fr~ LAmE, ·., (Please prl;plalnlyfoi scanning). .. (Day) NAMe ~~_, /)$vnfff . (Eve) ADDRESS: _y5 s 2_ ·_ 3 ~ rel I . PHONE f:< S"°S -'S<f-jSCJ Clty,&J/.bii 1 .State : :21-p'.9&2-. , -. -SJ-°9 Location of problem, H dHferent: Reported Prob/9111: Plat name: /l'J <2.f Lo(c,,1.., i!o,ne-:5 Other agencies Involved: »'-~ Lot No: / Block No: No.Field Investigation Needed __ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notified on ___ by _ phone _ letter _ In person ( iioft,d) · ·· · . DISPOSITION: Turned ~o f-· on f-r J · 9 7 . by ft-= OR: No further action recommended because: _ Lead agency tias been notified: · roblem has been corrected. .-~~""'N,_o-p-ro_,.b.,..le-m""'ha,--s..,.b-e-en-:-:ld-en...,t"'lfl-ed'"". ---_-_...,P=-r,-lo-r ,...,n-ve-s"'"tlg-a""t1-on-ad.,..d,-re-s-se_s_p-ro·b1em: _ r/vate problem -NDAP w(f/ nor consider because: _ Water originates onslte and/or on neighboring parcel . Locatlon}s outside SWM Servlc(Area. DATE CLOSED: ~by:# . ~1.,-5) ' Seo Alo# • _. _ Other (Specify): • • • .--~----·-··-..... ·-·------ Date: January 13, 1997 Date of Investigation: January 11, 1997 FM: Gary-Paul Reinke RE: Evaluation for Complaint# 97-0056 Ben Lamb 14105 SE 133"' Street Renton, WA 98059 255-5459 ·-· ----··------- Mr. Lamb lives in the Puget Colony Homes project. The neighborhood had significant flooding during the Xmas storm of 1997. They experienced several feet of standing water around their homes. This area has been under a study by Wendy Kara and Don Althauser. They do have a project that is ready to be started but are held up by one or two property owners. A public meeting is schedule for this coming February to discuss the solution. This part of the complaint should be closed to that project. -Downstream from Mr. Lamb is another series of pipes which might be plugged or collapsed. I suggest we do a Quick Fix on this section to determine the actual condition of the pipe. Please see the attached diagram. <._ C-, \< ~ --, KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION {10) ~ DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT · o . Page 1: INVESTIGATION'REQUEST Type FC1c -Received from: I I . (Please print plainly for scanning). (Day) Date: .r@ f; 7 OK'd by: ~ File No. q,-'() -, 1 "5 (Eve) NAME: . (L(;JJ&:;g~ . . . PHONEcf55-'8i2i""'--)~~-~ . ~ . ADDRESS: 138 :<11'. (_5£ · /3/AI c<?-1 City '-/Bdflii?v State Zip .frf<2[9 Location of problem, If different: Plat-name: '#~ e,ii111,,,J~ 4.u//w,/4 u OJ d..v ~ <l/ ~ .e.,,n,ql cy' do a<y;i.o,tf ~"f t.veef 6-7? S£ /3~ ,nd SI Lot No: Block No: Other agencies Involved: No_Fleld Investigation Needed __ _ (lntuals) ~i~li~~-k~-~Z~'t~ttr(:~1~Af.~~~J~fC.~MRl~.W.l~BW.-~~txtL•~at~r~;;.~~!t.tf~~lE!f.J~;t}i~ j/jj 11/ c13 _5_ Parcel No. /~/L.'1:?Q6 -01-.'l ~ Kroll J/(} V\J Th.Bros: New 0.%,//~ 1/4 S T R Old ?:f7> 1)5 BaslnLC/f Council Dist_0__ Charge No: DISPOSITION: Turned to · On . by . OR: No further action recommended because . _j2 Lead agency has been notified: io k5) ~eJ?-1' ,<1,v &;>: -!f?ef'.GCJ Jt L--(! F 5 • Problem has been corrected. _ No problem has been Identified. Prior Investigation addresses problem: -See File# ----- -Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: Water originates onslte and/or on neighboring parcel ------:-Location Is outside SWM Service _Area. _. _ Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED:~ /cf/ 22_ by: _fi ct rJ) 7c) ~p _5' . INVESTIGATION DA'1'E: 4-10-97 ADDRES81 ~3845 SE 13lsr ST LOCATION: CITY RENTON PHONE REPORT DATE: 4-11-97 ZIP !>8059 P'ACIUTY# INITLWI, DCD MAINTENANCE DMSION: 4. (15) CHAIN LINK FENCED DAMAGED DUR)NG LAST STORM EVENT. NEED TO DO A ASSESSMENT OF THE FACILITY ON MIS TO REPLACE THE CHAIN LINK FENCE. WILL DO RESEARCH TO FIND OUT WHAT POND nns IS AND WHETHER WE MAINTAIN nns POND. COULD BE AN OLD OFF OR REGIONAL FACILITY. FURTHER RESEARCH NEEDED. I talked to Lany Gettle about the maintenance of the pond in question and found out that ii is maintained by roads as part of the SE 128th street drainage. Sent email to Jon Cassidy about the problem. Attached copy of e-mail to Jon Cassidy. File closed to Roads . • • DR.Aill·AGE·INvESTIGATIONREPORT lllo//7) '.;-,: . r r . .. Page I: INVESTIGATION REQUEST Type (_., PROBLEM:LDC41 d:e.'lA:>'.ia's= ;. f'?A!'vev.P r-I OK'd b : FILE No.Cf 1-/ 3r eceived from: (Day) ( ) L(V5(Eve) ,._( ----<l NAME:.l_~oc/"'-c::;__:_/).:._c,-_.::.J.u-~:....._------PHONE 9'.?t/210/e tJ .:pjf /C/flf t/ I 'i O {) '-I ,.,, ADDRESS:._-..)_,t;:;:c...~_. ~/_,,.3"-'3"'--~-+>_st--'--______ City l(e.-<t ±er State µ,ff Zip 1 ~05'7 Location of problem, if different: Parcel NoJA2. gco-D\LPD Kroll gl!> t-Th.Bros: New Lt W J-1 Z, Old ?,':, ~ Basin / (,R,_ Council District~ Charge No. ______ _.:___ ............................................................................. -............................................ -......... -.............................................................................................. _________ ,., .......................................... . RESPONSE: Citizen notified on -----by: __ phone _. _ Jetter __ in person DISPOSITION: Turned tog_ on /tl, I , z2 by ~R: No further action recommended because: __ Lead agency has been notified:-------------------,----- -Problem has been corrected, _ No problem has been identified, .--Prior investigation addresses problem: SEE FILE# ----a-Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: w, __ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel, __ Location is outside WLRD Service Area. __ Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED: @ I {Ct '[v i --· • • Evans, Glenn From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Althauser, Don Tuesday, October 07, 1997 4:54 PM Welch, Maureen ONell, Mike; Kara, Wendy; Evans, Glenn; Adler, Paul; Parsons, Randall Phone Complaint from Lola Archer -status Ms Archer complained about activity on our Capital Improvement Project-Puget Colony Homes Flooding Improvements to your office a second time. · We called her to understand her Issues about unfenced area of the project and nuisance flooding potential In her rear yard area. People were accessing her property at times when the contractor's equipment did not block entry and caused nuis.ance on the unimproved right of way adjacent to her home. Paul Adler supervised a Conservation Corp crew to Install a pennanent fence at the perimeter of the work area at several sites to secure the private properties. His program allowed for quick response and an Inexpensive solution to the complaint. Ms Archer is concerned about surface water drainage changes that may occur due to our construction. We ·have filed her complaint with Local Drainage Services Unit and requested support from Glen Evans in the Neighborhood Drainage Assistance Program to provide a drainage solution for her lot and an adjoining lot. This program Is capable of providing small drainage project construction this fall. It Is apparent from field inspection that they need a drainage llne to convey surface flows from an adjoining pasture-through their lots to the street drainage system. Our field Inspector has had many contacts with Ms. Archer and taken care to protect her property, but Ms Archer felt we were not addressing her Issues adequately and quickly enough. I have also encouraged her to contact me in the future If she feels her concerns are not being addressed. From discussion with her and neighbors I think these staff actions will fully address her concerns. Page 1 • • • DATE: TO: FROM: --------------.--- NEIGHBORHOOD DRAINAGE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM COMPLAINANT EVALUATION MBMO December 2, 1997 FILE JEFF JACOBSON RE: ENGINEERING EVALUATION FOR COMPLAINT NO. 97-1378; Archer COMPLAINT CHRONOLOGY: ORIGINAL: FIELD INV: FIELD EVAL: OLD FILES: BACKGROUND: 9/24/97 11/21/97 11/21/97 N/A Don Althauser with the CIP group is heading a conveyance project in the area of SE 133rd Street and 140th Avenue SE. The project will convey the area's surface water from a nearby wetland along an undeveloped portion of King County right-of-way, 140th Avenue SE. As part of the project "the County cleared the flora found in the right-of- way including a few large trees. The· conveyance line is expected to be constructed sometime in the late spring of 1998. Two residents ·claim to have been affected by the clearing practice, the aforementioned Ms. Archer and her neighbor Lilly Bischai/ Rene Treadwell. Ms. Archer claims surface water enters the· back of her property resulting in stailding water problems. According to Ms. Archer ·the recent clearing has exasperated the extent of the standing water problems. In the past Archer's neighbor~, Bischai/Treadwell, have had greater standing water problems. They have a sump pump in the basement of their house. The pump outlets to the drainage system fronting their property along SE 133rd Street. Ms. Archer would like to see a conveyance system installed along the property boundary shared with her neighbor Bischai/Treadwell with the termination point located in the backyard. The Bischai/Treadwells have recently expressed their desires to have a drainage system i'nstalled after first taking a "wait and see" approach. The rainstorm of December 17, 10th of i997 changed their minds. Both residents firmly believe the recent clearing has exasperated their drainage problems. FINDINGS: Since the problem meets all of the NDAP project criteria listed below, it qualifies for·and has been investigated under the NDAP program. • The problem site is within the SWM service area and does not involve a King County (KC) code violation. 1 • • • • The problem site shows evidence of or reported localized flooding, erosion and/or sedimentation within the off road drainage system on private residential and/or commercial property due to later upstream development. • The.problem ls caused by surface water from more than one adjoining property. SOILS: According to the KC soils map, the site is located in the following soil association: ALDERWOOD ASSOCIATION: Moderately well drained undulating to hilly soils that have dense, very slowly permeable glacial till at a depth of 20 to 40 inches; on uplands and terraces. OPTIONS AND DISCUSSION: 1. Construct a conveyance line along the two complainant's properties with one termination point in the backyard of the Archer property and the other in the open ditch found on the Bischai property. The conveyance l.ine would outlet in the sump/storm drain system found fronting the complainants• property. 2. Do nothing. The CIP project may provide some relief to the problem. The project is scheduled to be constructed in the spring/summer of 1998. The trench for the project may intercept problematic surface water and re-direct it to the south and away from the complainants' properties. IMPACT SCORE = 40 PROPOSED SOLUTION: The NDA Program will incur the material costs for the proposed project discussed under option number. 1. The CIP group will provide the funding for the remainder of the project. PRIORITY SCORE= 3.1 2 ~---------~------- •• u,.,a.a,;.,.a., .... A,,J.,.L#' .LIL"l,J.U.,' .l.'~Li'.>VUKL.I!.,~ J.llVl~lUN DRAINAGE INvESTIGATION REPORT ~ Pag~: l~STIGATION REQUEST ·-+",,-;"'-",.,..=="""-'=-...,k"'=...,QJM.[=e.....;~~ CEIYEDBY: Date: ¢: OK'd b FILE No. Cii1-/ ?;JB1) NAME: ADDRESS: Location of problem, if different: Reported Problem: CALL FIRST O (Would Like To Be Present) ~ Je.ee-np-f,~ h, 4,_/~ t/_ r~ Other agencies involved: BasinlL,tZ Lot No: Block No: No field investigation required __ _ (initials) Parcel No, t/12-S'66 -o l]O Kroll 'b/1) B Th.Bros: New &6& H 2- 0ld 35D5 Council District ~ Charge No. ________ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notified on ------by: __ phone _·_ letter __ in person DISPOSITION: Turned to on _ __,_/ _ _,_/ __ by __ OR: No further action recommended because: __ Lead agency has been notified:-------,------------,--------- --Problem has been corrected. __ No problem has been identified. __ Prior inves~ation addresses problem: · SEE FILE# ':J-2-t Y7 J' • Private problem -NDAP will riot consider because: . ___ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. Location is outside WLRD Se~. __ Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED: /0; / I 'fJ By: __£J/ 5t:-~-f7-/J7rf>' • • --~----~-·-------. -~·-··--··----~------·---·-~ ------··-~-··--·-,.···· TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: KING COUNTY WATER & LAND RESOURCES INTERNAL MEMORANDUM Glenn Evans Larry Gettle October 1, 1997 Archer, Lola 97-1378 14004 Southeast 133rd Street Reference, 97-1380 Treadwell These complaints were referred to us by Don Althauser. These sites are adjacent to and part of the Puget Colony Homes BPCIP Project. The problem here is water ponding in the backyards of these two parcels. These are being referred to you per your discussion with Don . DRA:INA6E INVESTIGATION 'REPORT 4~ D~!:)... I Page I: INVESTIGATION REQUEST (jo j Type (~ PROBLEM: l1.f)'1Ct_ RECEIVED BY: Jl-cJ Date: 1/":5 OK'd by:))~FILE No. CfJ-O{)IJ7 .Received from: . (Day) ( f7Jz} PHONE 'J2j.JJ. -'21.-tl, (Eve) ~< _ __,_) NAME: ()/<:j l, Gae.-t #'-L- ADDRESS: l:?f:l0"1 14-g-l"" :Pl . Location of problem, if different: SE. ~os15 City 'Ren-hnL.-State __ Zip 118QS~ Reported Problem: CALL FIRST D (Would Like To Be Present) 1,-~, W name: ~M 1-f-it/ S }Jo 4 Lot No: lP--14 BlockNo: Other agencies involved: No field investigation required __ (initials) 5W :...11::_ ?-3 --2._ Ifs, 14.3 ~ E.i,: Y-i S T R Parcel No. iDJ?Q:'l-Q5tD Kro115S)I IN Th.Bros: NeVf(gS(p ::f~ Old-:,5()<, Basin /JJ2-: Council District Jl:_ Charge No .. _______ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notified on I-s--rr by: __ phone _. _ letter _r__ in person €~ 170~.:. d,-., wl-i, k ~'a"-• Clos~ w,'lf.., W/f# ls:'Ob 3' :Po, DISPOSITION: Turned to on / / by __ OR: No further action recommended because: L. Lead agency has been notified: K'o -1:-? s rJ1trN'f %~ [d:L--al'7 ..S _ Problem has been corrected. _ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: SEE FILE# ---- _ Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: • Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. Location is outside WLRD Se~P.1· __ Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED: f; ~( I ff By: _)E_"O ·:) . 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 ,Hl 0 0. 0 lmJ~gency "aUance Division: 4 Thous Bros Nap: 657 A3 Type: Pond BRIAR HILLS I ~ Street Address: 14005 -149TH PL SE Directions: FROM SE 128TH ST, TAKE 144TH AVE SE. GO SOUTH. TUR_N··1.2 .SE 142ND ST. TURN LEFT ONTO 149TH PL SE •. THE POND IS ON. THE LEFT 14005. Checked on 1/1S/9ft by DOUB DOBKINS~ Special Equip1ent: SWN Notes/Coo1ents: Radio 1: 555 Charge to Project 1: Oft7~75 Fisheries: N Repair inlet pipe to CS/CBI and backlill with~ to 6 inch spalls to anchor pipe. ll you have any questions concerning the anchoring of the pipe please contact Doug Dobkins at 296-1975 or on Cell 660-ft352. Roads Div. Notes: Task Unit Code Type I Date Actual Naterial Naterial Units Wori Requested Coapleted Units !nit Placed Excavated W02 Ea. Fae. 1 iReaove sediaent in control structure CSCB/1, (rellOI • WIS Each 2 IRe1ove sediaent lroa the lollowing catch basin(sl and dispose in accordance with applicable Regulations: CB12 CB13 (rel2101 W2~ Ea.fac. l •Perlon the following aaint_enance/repair work: repair inlet pipe to CS/CBI. see notes in the co11ent section .• ( ref6601 Worl<. A_uthor i zed: _______________ _ Worl<. Completed •----------------Progra1 Version: February 22 1 1993 Date: _____ _ Date: _____ _ KING COUNTY WATER A.'!B 16AND RESOURCES DIVISION · DRAINAGE INvESTIGATION REPORT f z_ \) \ Page I: lNVESTIGA TION REQUEST ( ' Type L- PROBLEM: tfA:J f\A:(;rb .CEIVED BY: µu Date: C::f 2-2-OK'd by: ~ILE No. q 8'-03LPD Received from: NAME: C..-curot MU{e.Y ADDRESS: \"\464 % l:w/1d :'if Location of problem, if different: (Day) (425) (Eve) fC& ) PHONEZ.01-L,,/[O (0er~ 2.'t"u -1 13(, City'.±0~ State ZipC/&)::f} Reported Problem: CALL FIRST D (Would Like To Be P;e,ent) • Plat name: BitLCk L.oc.uv_ 5:...a.,Mt_ Other agencies involved: I .2-~ LL LotNo: 7 Block No: No field investigation required __ (initials) ·TOBE COMPLETED BY COMPLAINT PROGRAM STAFF ~ 15 '23 S Y-i -S-7r -R-Parcel No. 0'84-110 -000"r Kroll :?10 6 Th.Bros: New v~,:r:'k,. Old '3 '5D '? Council District !:!._ Charge No .. ________ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notified on 5 --z..1-9 8 by: V phone __ letter __ in· person "':?e_n+ To DDE.S -e:,-,,,._J.:"'). C...onro...c..f: R.&s..-.<ij Sc,,.,-,<1_;1'7, ;J., pev-m·f~ +01,1.nd +or 3v-.,_cl:n::, wor-k) poss:bJe. ;"'1f"''-t to YYI~~'(' -pvop~i-:,1. DISPOSITION: Turned to on / / by __ OR: .No further action recommended because: -2[' Lead agency.has been notified: ,/!Rz:._ ~~&q--c..z-~0'.Gaa:::S ;){)~ _ Problem has been corrected. _ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: -SEE FILE# W-Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: __ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. Location is outside WLRD Se~e~ __ Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED: ~ pf'tj I fljY By:__,{[_'</ /,/l>a?_p~ • ----·-·· ·----··-··-··- Complaint 98-0360 Meyer Investigated by Robert Manns on 5-27-98 I found that a large area bad been cleared, approximately 1/2 acre. An existing depression with water is located at the south side of Tax parcel 084710-0045, next to Meyer's property. Some dirt and debris has been pushed into the water from the grading work being done on parcel -0045. I checked Sierra and found no permits for the grading work. Clarence Weyer is the property owner of this parcel. His house is on the adjoining parcel; house# 14602. Meyer's property is not impacted by the work, because of the higher elevation above the grading. Barn • EJ I \Prop. Lines 18" cone. Meyer 14454 12" cone. SE. 132nd ST. ___ .._ __ 4--__ __c__ _______ _ I I e1 I I I I "' 12" cone. 12" cone. Weyer 14602 146th A VE. SE. NTS I -KING COUNTY WATER AND LAND RESOURCES DIVISIOJly: z._ 1 · DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT . l 2 :I --;;; iJ ~ , /I • .Jage I: INVESTIGATION REQUEST Type r L,,I l PROBLEM: r~~ · . • EJ\'.ED BY: <?/it?.> . · . Date: ~/f9S OK'd by: F~LE No. PJ' ~ 5:JQ Received from:~--or; {JC1(,t?.e.) ~~ . /J (Day) { ) NAME: ~_a/J,!]_, PHONE------ (Eve) ,._( _ __,) ADDRESS: _______________ City ______ State. __ Zip __ _ Location of problem, if different: .Reported Problem: CALL FIRST D (Would Like To Be P;esent) . iJ)z;A ~l.i/tu «~ 1f)p072~ «» ~~ ~-<'/VJ, ~I~ 0t'l{b ~ZW La,a/ :fl/A/V/ ~~A/~_,/~~ cxJ ff20I d~/'/ZU!lj, ~o/ ~/2,0 ~ ~o/, 11:. 0 9 O 0 ~ 9 , en fJ905 I .5 m 11co5 -l'/f-t/, /Y sE 'r 8 .. /537 rft . "'I/ ;1;J \ -rf / 9 ,0007 V/lL ',;v-U~ H Plat name: 'L}, Lot No: Block No: Other agencies involved: No field investigation required __ (initials) TO BE COMPLETED BY COMPLAIN_T PROGRAM STAFF: · (,.57 651, 7 :J ¥ JL J3. _s:_ . . ,0 ' Y-i S 'T R Parcel No. / (} 7J03rJ'2?/Q Kroll f// 0 Th.Bros: New Basin/...f:Jr Council District .M_ os-00e Charge No. _______ _ Old RESPONSE: Citizen notified on -----by: __ phone __ letter __ in·person DISPOSITION: Turned to on __ /~~/ __ by __ OR: . No further action recommended because: __ Lead agency has been notifi :.,: ----------------------- -Problem has been com;cted. No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: . . SEE FILE# ---- _. Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: __ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. Location is outside WLRD S~a. __ Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED: f'1 /J 1ff By: //IJ~ tr/JI t>::swr • • • .. ------M '•T . I . . , ... •, . Complaint 98-0520 Anonymous . ' Investigated by Robert Manns on 8-6-98 . I checked D90515 and found no problems. This facility has no ditch. In the pond facility D90669 there is a rock lined ditch that I found to have no problems. This pond had work done on it last year. It's clean and functioning. No problem was identified. No photo's were taken . R~M Type~- CEIVED BY: eceived from: Location of problem, if different: TO BE C0~1PLETED BY C0b1PLAINT PROGR4M STAFF t</ E . /$' ,.:i, q ____;i_ 114 S T R ParcelNo.Ogtf'l/OC(J'!j Basin LC,;f' Council District //}, Kroll fl/(}/:, Th.Bros: New C:S~ J.Z, Old J505 Charge No. _______ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notified on -----by: __ phone __ letter __ in person DISPOSITION: Turned tJJJ~f!.-on r I I r I ft by~R: No further actio~ recommended because: ~~tmey"ff!B=tiez:t~tified: _____________________ _ fem has been. corr · _ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: SEE FILE# --- Private problem -NDAP will not consider because:. -. Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. Location is outside WLRD Servi~ea.:. __ Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED: /2 12010{ By:0-~~ . . /?~tOl{}:,,e~b • • Date: March 26, 2001 Date of Investigation: December 14'', 2000 FM: Gary-Paul Reinke RE: WQ Evaluation for Complaint# 98-0534 Shayla and Casey Cox 13224 -144~ Avenue SE Renton, WA. 98055 Day ~CONNECTED (the Cox family has moved on) Owner "206-768-1062 11\\2, Findines I have been checking this site whenever I was in the area to see if! could find any evidence of the problems the Cox's have mentioned. I have not found any evidence of house pipes exiting to the stream or any other part of the property. The Cox's have moved on and there is a new family in the house now. They had no idea of what I was talking about. I did contact the owner (Roger Brendan) of the property and he said the previous tenants had made the illegal connection. The former tenants are now gone and the illegal pipe'has been plugged up. Numerous visits to the site confirm this is no longer a problem. Options and Discussion As I stated, I haven't found any evidence of the problem in about 8 spot checks on the place. TI1e overall condition of the property is poor and there is lots of junk lying about but nothing that would seem to affect water quality. Proposed Solution I suggest we close the complaint. ,· KING COUNTY WATER AND LAND RESOURCES DIVISION DRAINAGE INvESTIGATION REPORT (2.f,t,) · . . /1 · .. ?. . Page I: INVESTIGATION REQUEST l~ Type .,.c"cg_ .lOBLEM: &-V « «='"t) raN !? . . . 'CEIVEDBY: . t -CErrL~ Date: 3/.z/ 57 7 OK'd by: FILE No. q_q-o;J:6' r. Received from: (Day) ( f 'JS (Eve) ( ) NAME: --'-A-'--=t.-'-"L4.....:..C.0-'---LK,-"--'--/-=,E-=<,'-L-=c-?2_ ____ PHONE 2 2-C, / ,/.-f(. ADDRESS: I 4 Io;;. I 4 fo-1 ~ {._ s C City R o..,7e1,J St.ate w A Zip QJi;)sS Location of problem, if different: Reported Problem: . CALL FIRST D (Would Like To Be Present) /<jp /;,,v£) C!Jfc...cr t?'c .A-c A tV 0 / /M. I) /1_ <--' e:' t: .:-() . 1-v A ,..-c-YZ. /17< cE n-o= C,/,JC. Lot No: "3 / Block No: Other agencies involved: No field investigation required __ . dill "~om~,i,~..,~A11~ n "-swir~!\!:1l"-~--!%::!N~~'¥--~? n S ' T R Parcel No. l01 WI -6 '='l O Kroll 6'1 / \JV Th.Bros: New (os:&JD Old 6<S D(p Council District /"1..,-Charge No. _______ _ i-jz_7/97 by: _0hone __ letter ___ inperson BasinL.fL RESPONSE: Citizen notified on w.;t-#-15 9 ~s DISPOSITION: Turned to on / / by __ OR: No further action recommended because: __L.1 Leadagencyhasbeennotified: ~A-t, '> f'Vb:_,,.,...:-c Vr:r<::IA-L,.-o/>.S _· _ Problem has bee.n corrected. __ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investi:::,ation addresses problem: · . SEEF'n..E# ._ Private problem -NPAP will not consider because: ---- __ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. Location is outside WLRD Se~JllJ· _· _Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED: g I/ 71 // By: ~ w/!f?s:r • • • KING COUNTY Department of Natural Resources Water and Land Resource Division FILE NO, NAME D90515 ALLAN KIESLER ADDRESS 14102 148TH PL SE PHONE 425/226-1448 TB PAGE 656J3 DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT FIELD INVESTIGATION KROLL PAGE 811W DMP DATE INITIALS - 1/27 /99 MAINT. DIVISION DETAILS OF INVESTIGATION: 99°0188 • SllE VISIT ON 2/27/99. RECEIVED CALL FROM L. GETTLE THAT A R/D POND LOCATED IN THE PLAT OF BRIAR HILLS DIV. 4 WAS CURRENTLY IN OVERFLOW. MET WITH MR. KIESLER AND FAMILY ON SITE. INVESTIGATION FOUND THAT UPON SITE VISIT THE POND WAS OCCUAING A BREACH OF THE SPILLWAY ONTO 149TH PL SE, THE SPILLWAY IS DIRECTED TO OVERFLOW ONTO THE R/W WITH FLOW BEING COVEYED VIA CURBSIDE DRAIN AGE TO THE SOUTH. THREE TYPE I CATCH BASINS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF SE.139TH PL CONTAINED WATER OVERFLOW THE TOP OF THE BASIN, ·As WATER IN THE POND WAS AT A HIGHER ELEVATION THEN THE RIM OF THE BASIN GRADE. FLOW FROM THE TYPE I BASINS ARE CONVEY SOUTH ON 139 PL SE., ANO WEST ALONG SE 13 TH PL. A 35' RUN OF 30• CMP IS THE OUTLET PIPE FROM THE PONO TO THE CONTROL MANHOLE. THE MANHOLE REFLECTED WATER ENTERING THE 30• PIPE AT APPROX. 10% CAPACITY (•THAN 4-6j. THE OVERFLOW TEE•SECTIN WAS NOT IN OVERFLOW. THIS INDICATED THAT A BLOCKAGE OCCURED AT THE PIPE INLET TO THE CS/CB1. TREE DEBRIS FROM OVERHANGING EVERGREENS WERE REMOVED FROM THE PIPE INLET INCREASING THE AMOUNT OF WATER RELEASE TO THE CS/CB1. EVENTUALLY, WITH SOME MANUEL LABOR THE BLOCKAGE WAS REMOVED AND THE POND WAS CAPABLE OF DECREASING AND THE OVERFLOW CEASED. • THE KIEBLER LOT JS LOCATED ON THE S.W. SIDE OF THE POND WITH A PRIVATE GATE PROVIDING ACCESS TO THE TRACT. THE BERM ELEVATION ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PONO DID NOT POSE A THREAT TO THE KIESLER LOT. WATER WAS DESIGNED TO OVERFLOW ONTO THE R/W OF 149TH PL SE. MR. KIESLER AND FAMILY WAS VERY PLEASED WITH THE EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCE ANO OPPORTUNITY TO DISCUSS THE FUNCTION OF THE POND • SKETCH: '&-~ KING COUNTY WATER AND LAND REsOURCES DIVISION C -.)l --- DRAINAGE INvESTIGATION REPORT hrto) . . -Page I: INVESTIGATION REQUEST ~ Type L _ .OBLEM: ~0'7,,x..., · RECEIVEDBY: /U!I)., Date:0 /t7 OK'dby: ~FILENO. qq-{)(jOC'/ Received from: (Day) ( ) (Eve) ( ) PHONE _____ _ NAME:~ ----£~ ADDRESS: /4itt0{g ,65 /.3./e Pl ,5r Location of problem, if different: City ~ State __ Zipq~ Reported Problem: CALL FIRST D (Would Like To Be Present) ~u-t~J -ni ~ ~i-..,r trrL-td :3.f3 tz.i //4-g-lh fr1le-Se C7D C4£,V-5). JJ,iio r.o ~ t!J--iJ'-'-l:.wvna.x,-d ~ (,wvp!e wnrds 6S~). ~qu,i._ jJ/0-,no iZJ ~,,;,, a2uw -/zJ /4:gn"-$) [Uhtc,AJ he-u;,.) . - ~ ~~ ~ ~.cJnc_e_ k ~ -hu _,,s,x,_d ~ ;,Y)./vv.u}, ~ ~ ~ /YY'Vv +Ju-~ tJ-nA'v rt.VU P,tJ~?J-· c,/,_,_vf? eX s-f g d ra-, ::_Y' • ~ t.._ r f' r"( • • Plat name: Lot No: Block No: Other agencies involved: s T R Th.Bros: New u5ZtJ J2.. Old ?6PS Basin I.-CJ2-Council District~ Charge No. _______ _ . { I . RESPONSE: Citizen notified on ~ "l'j tJ z.f by: __ phone __ letter ~ in p~rson d,n--µ14, ,;-i;~c-.-c.... ~ :s,<t-.r, ~ £~ -~ .-,:;,-,._. w-.- ~ ~e>ro P.n,,n .. .,.,-........A-.;6y ~----.....c ~;,,,a..-u;-....,.,.J, VT,,-...... ~4-.. .¢ //f w., ,,.--..,J C!,r ~ C......,,n -~....,, e """"''° ~ p • .c~ er-.,,. If'<, .,,;.-.A ....,G-e_ . .....,~~ ~ ,... .s~ ,.,; r:-.,,:> .!rF nk ,4..,,,.1 .,...._ .,., ~ '4.vc~ ..,._ ,,.,;(,, '"""· a&' ,11,-(..h 'f77',:.,-o .,4.,,;,,... ~ ~tA:J l,r~ K.C. _.v'__...,::-> ,:::::.....,.-..1 o,.:,-~ 1~V~~. DISPOSITION: Turned to·--on / / by __ OR: No further action recommended ber.ause: _£ Lead agency has been notified: /(,,JC ~-.J A/7 1 ~~f _· _ Problem has been corrected. ___ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: • SEEFILE# --Private problem -NPAP will not consider because: --- __ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. Location is outside WLRD Se~jf-9) __ Other (Specify): DATE CLOSED: ?1 2 I /9 By: ~V ;!?/frl~k t' • ::."t/.'.:.r. \if t · .:::.~:.":~_);;:.. ~·-· ~~ ' Complaint 99-0609 Torantola Investigated by Chris Treichel 08/19/99 Visited, and met Mrs. Torantola at the site. Her property is a five acre lot, Lot 16 of Black Loam Five Acre Tracts. Her lot is at the east end of the semi developed portion of SE 136m ST. The lot slopes from north to south. Streets 144m Ave SE, 146m Ave SE, 148m Ave SE, and l 32"d Ave SE are undeveloped at this time. The area in question is east of the site. It is wooded area of approximately 62.7 acres, has type 2 and 3 wetlands on it, and is located within the city limits of Renton. There is currently a land use proposal . by Bumstead Construction filed with the city under: LUA-99-069, PP, ECF,V, to subdivide the property into 218 lots for single family residences. Mrs. Torantola is concerned that the development proposal does not adequetley address the storm water runoff She also said that two years ago she received a letter from the county wanting to vacate SE 136m ST, so the county could expand Maplewood park and put in additional baseball fields. The Bumstead proposal does not include using SE 136m ST . 14606 SE 136m ST .I • ..... ~j :J 1: II t::! . Di~ ~ , ____________ l Jit.~_JL. .L3.i ____________ .. 1~ . -· · future baseball fteldl? NIS Wetlands -----------~ ~ KlNG COUNTY WATER AND LAND RESOURCES DIVISION C Jl - ~ DRAINAGE INvESTIGATIONREPORT (j"I') . /J. . c-lh: ,J' /, I =:-~age 1: INVESTIGATION REQUEST Type _L...L__ .OBLEM: (Jl//$_//Lt/Jcf lt/(}d/JJ. · .CEIVEDBY: Date: OK'd b . ~ FILENO. Received from: Location of problem, if different: Pht r.ame: Lot No: (Eve) 1Y.C?) 20.Y-9~ ._Zip9t0$1 Block No: Other agencies involved: No field investigation required __ ~ !l~~~l!'§.9.WAr~r,IP~~~ Y4 S ' T R Parcel No. i0:J2 ('.)?01:4:() Kroll 'flt Th.Bros: New (Q5\.p J 2-;1 3 Old BS 0.5 Basin L--CIZ., Council District -11::-Charge No. _______ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notified on 8'7)/9 9 by: _k_ phone ___ letter __ in person M,r;. ..,;...,'° tf2t.1.-..,-A/ O"" , ,,rzr tr/:,.7/P~ . .,.,_ ~~ ,:s _,.., ~ C-1v v:>ur- c?.,... •--j ,<w • ,,._,;, .,CO u-. ~ I Or¥, ,;,r,--""'""~.., .,.,_,-,-_.-e.,., ~;> _,<k#¢/.-<,.. ?°y,r- . ~ ~ -"oD -f,-,1 .,,,,,__,., V -,J ...,, ~ ~ ,t"1,,0.r; DISPOSITION: Turned to on -~l-~I~-by __ OR: No further action recommended because: __ Lead agency has been notified: ______________________ _ ~-Problem has been correcied. _ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: SEEF'ILE# --- • Private problem -NJ)AP will not consider because: __ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. Location is outside WLRD S~. _Lother (Specify): DATE CLOSED: 'f I ,,l__ I / / By: G.t2vJ,-.,'»...J~ fV;'/M.i • Wet area • CMU Wall 2-4' tall • ·,, ) ·. '',(' -~:' _,., , · · · ,,: -' · . .' · ·, ·, ·,' :\., .. '.·.· },'.·.··.;._ .. i,v_·,··.·.. -.'.,''.'.'''' ... \.,·. ,· .. · . .-; ;,. ",_" -.1 ·k:-'.-. i"' ;-.. -~'c..c:..;...c_' ~· c.,.•.:.· ..c..c..c.:s:=.L".'-""--=-'2-"""'-"-""--.:.....:--'--------'--~-· Complaint 99-0625 Quinn Investigated by Chris Treichel 08/30/99 Met with Mrs. Quinn on site Aug. 27, 1999. Her lot is Lot 44 of Briar Hills Div 4. The property is relatively flat but the house does sit in the higher elevation. There is a CMU block wall on the west property line. The water drains away from the house in all directions. 1liey have a street to tlie east and south, a single-family residence to tire west, and Maplewood Park to the north. She stated that she was worried about an area in the Northwest comer of the property where the water seems to slowly infiltrate. She stated that she and her husband thought that the sprinkler system for the yard maybe leaking, they are in the process of replacing some of the sprinkler heads. When they were digging the sprinkler heads up, she stated that there was water in the ground. She also stated that they smelled a waste type of odor. The area seemed to be the low point from tl1e park, house and neighbors. She stated that this was occurring prior to the CMU wall being installed. Maplewood Park Blockade at end of road Lot 44 Briar Hills #2 SE 138th PL = a: • -NTS ------------------------------------------ KING COUNTY WATER AND LAND RESOURCES DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT c~ol INVESTIGATION REQUEST Type-. (:_, ..ilOBLEM: 'DfUI 10A GrE:- WcEIVEDBY: Ao...Juc.., Date: t;.zs&lloK'db FILENo. -597 Received from: (Eve) 1--C _--..J) NAME: MRS. ADDRESS: / L/: / 0 0 (Day) (tf)-5) PHONE 2 2(:, -'2, Cf 5°6 City ~""'--State __ Zip Cj" /-() 5~ LOCATION OF PROBLEM, IF DIFFERENT: Access Permissio11 Gra11ted ~ Call First (Would .Like To Be Present) l8J Alo /$/a /161 r J0 , I h?cu; b!, !lo~cls fad 1ft; ~ . j),-!{ c_ v<:S~ -<J / I)),,..; ,,/?,/,11,/£~ · /J of\) w 1 ~ t.. CA t.L tt,f,e s Y /11-, 7V' /hv0 /J1ccu>.S fY.?oJ~---r. /_j:,_,rf> //NT/ L /.-;/?f,Js..,- Plat name: /7z:,,r1 l>otv, "711<} Other agencies involved: Lot No: Block No: §1 .. .121=:: --1.5. ':23 ___.5_ Y.'.i S -T-R Parcel No. /5JJu5f:J/7 Kroll J/0£ Th.Bros: New 0.J{Q '/l.:?;if2 ' Basin LC,8 Council District /,J._, Charge No. _______ _ .RESPONSE: Citiz~n notified on q ~/ 2> l, by: ~ phone __ letter __ in person '})o,._, ,At-,HA-v$-E::fL gt' .w] Mt-S, YA;,JJ -r1:> PIS-<!.-vlS vf'u...,.,N2., C!. t ,P f /1-o J6,,:;,....,-, µc> I N \I . /J G Gc:,S-5,q (VJ 5~ (.,,)AS SA 11 5' f'" l6C> l,J 1-,. H HI S I t-J~AC,""'--ri'I t V"' , DISPOSITION: Turned to on / / by __ OR: No further action recommended because: X-Lead agency has been notified: :J W G,~ 5 D<2 f>./ It L. T /iA iJ ..S .(;--fe-.- Problem has been corrected. _ No problem ii'as been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: SEE FILE# ---e Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: · Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. ___ Location is outside WLRD Service Area. DATE CLOSED: '=f 1 ~ ;0"'6 By: D~ -~Other (Specify): 1< f n --ro s vJ e E:: s KING COUNT'Y WATER AND LAND RESOURCES DIVISION J DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT CJ' v-PP-- ~ /1/'l-fi. INVESTIGATION REQUEST Type FC!l. .OBLEM: up P1t / j"'f"} J ~~ . RECEIVEDBY: Date:// !CO OK'dby: j/l'""\c1" FILENO. CA:3-o;z.G:3 Received from: D (Day) ( t/},S) (Eve) ~C -~> NAME: ___,,,,,_,T ~"-~"---1..110,;iLL,(.,C.Lfu.Y:L.Ai..,..... _____ PHONE aJ-8:: -/ <./t./ '/ ADDRESS:~/,_~~OO:;_;:__,_L{~, ..... S"'=£,,__--+/.J--='.):......!--'-"O'---_._,S_..T_.__city ~ r State_ ---_-Z-ip_9_'6C6'i_ LOCATION OF PROBLEM, IF DIFFERENT: UO € ,.,.Access Permission Granted O Call First (Would Like To Be Present~ 11l1q 0-0 3 :.:'"' fM ~fi\2~100 ~JM (YV7 ~ ~ }tpt • Plat name: .. <-/µ~~~~~ n-,,rA,, ();U, ~ U:; ~ °'-~ )N, pj.ku ~ ~ ~ Lot No: Other agencies involved: Block No: KrollS/0 Th.Bros: New bs0t/ d. Basin LC,&, Council District ..11::_ Charge No. ________ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notified on by: __ phone __ letter __ in person J)15c.v<:5 ~ W / J:tc_/c_ ?·,;'IA/7/fnfN P55'. /k /~ /5..::nr,,..f /.V {tf,uvt-c7 (.,.// ?.:, Ur /11,tv<) /::h-J 1 "'7>'7/ ,,P,cp,,t/~......-c, (y-r7.£ . DISPOSITION: Turned to on _ _,_I _..,,I __ by __ OR: No further action recommended because: __ Lead agency has been notified: _________________________ _ Problem has been corrected. __ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: .-. SEE FILE# __ _ -. _ Private problem . NDAP will not consider because: ___ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. Location is outside WLR~jrea. DATE CLOSED {-( > I t7 ( By: ~ ;fpP-yrP />5 .5 -~Other (Specify): • • • Complaint No 00°0763 Investigated By: Virgil Pacampara DETAILS OF INVESTIGATION Name: Lola Archer Date: November 29, 2000 I went to the residence of Mrs. Lola Archer on 11/29/00 at 3 :00 PM. She was not home at time of the visit. I was able to spoke with Mr. Rene Treadwell (neighbor of Mrs. Archer) who lives at# 14005 SE 133'd St. He is also concern on the damaged gate and people entering/using the easement as a trail/access which is located at the back/rear side of his property. Mr. Treadwell showed me the damaged /tom down gate. He informed me that the King county has installed the fence gate and showed me also drainage catch basin alonf the undeveloped trail. Investigation shows that the gate is located at the south end of the culdesac of SE 132° St. The gate is made of ·aluminum grill/ round bar and attached to a wooden post (4"by 4" by 6 feet). The gate is at the comer of 140'" Ave. SE and SE 132•• Ave. St. The fence gate is detached from the wooden post and bent. Inquiry reveals that the access road is not included in the list of KC maintained road. It is a dirt road and undeveloped and no street vehicular access. Gravel Road 15 14 Archer #14004 I fflfi!i!a 1133 RD ffl"i!i"a ii Treadwell #14005 I 18 I 31 :I 32 Ill!. 11 Ml'll'IMI 11"11'. 33 l DNTS ~------------------------------------ aoBLEM: RATS KING COUNTY WATER AND LAND KESOURCES DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT C ~~ J IN ~\r> poV~GATION REQUEST Type r-c. ~ ~CEIYEDBY: Date: 1 7., 3 O I OK'd b : ~ FILE No. 2001 . Received from: . NAME: KG.IJ f A '<Lurz-(Eve) ,_{ _ __,) AooREss: /41?.. D 5£ / 3 'f # LOCATION oF PROBLEM, IF DIFFERENT: I 1to o s (Day) ( lfL5) PHONEF5-4:3 6 7 Pl City ~"" State. __ Zip __ _ J 4'Cj 4 "'-f L $.f . Access Permission Granted D Call First (Would Like To Be Present) D I tz.slol ':.tle-' ~\ 1\t't\b\ n~ ru.!7kloorlto1id Ji~ b~e.,1/\, r~v/q..-tj {:ee_J,~5 -/-k-c, dv~ ,:,_ +he P.,,/D pov\J, 1/,e., bv--eJ av1J .f o o j} -tin 'f' j a~ /e.,;,. vi ~"J -f"t1r--+he du f/k-5. h u: s /:f /-Pr ti (,,f e --;) r 4 f s . ~ -I /w.,re., ~ IA / ti-lc7-rvh~ av« 1f~)b fe deler-fo 1', pvtJ};,~K, ~ ( ~ , w/ ~ DJ~ d ,<:ut' ~" ,,<:U~ ~ -~ , Do,.; c;. /c,I C-6 /1/1 A :, /l i.,s;t, IC/JDµ,) , Plat name: l'C\. ~ < /~1'//s ./tlf {DtJDSISj Lot No: Block No: DISPOSITION: Tunied to on _ _,_/ _ _,_/ __ by __ OR: No further action recommended because: _ Lead agency has been notified: -.-::=-------------------------Problem has been corrected. No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: • SEE FILE# __ _ Private problem· NDAP will not consider because: ___ W.ater originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. Location is outside WLR~~Area. DATE CLOSED h I 2 KJ/ By: -~~u+~I/_ /VtJfn../6 _ ___,Other (Specify): KING COUNTY WATER AND LAND RESOURCES DIVISION DRAINAGE INvESTIGATION REPORT ---, (?t/8~ Type £CfZ._. Date: OK'd b : FILE No. 2001 - Received from: V .. f}_ (Day) ct/JS) - NAME:ff/;1/J. #~~ PHONE ,Q'35'-i367 ADDRESS: (t{Cjr).O 86 /3,9Y1, Pl-City RE<\---ttOi-l State LJA Zip __ (Eve) ,_( _ __,) tt{oos 1lfr1' Pl LoCATION OF PROBLEM, IF DIFFERENT: Access Permission Granted D Call Fi~st (Would Like To Be Present) D ~10 h~ Plat name: '9'7(J5/'J Lot No: Block No: Other agencies involved: No field investigation required ~ . 5-. Y4 · S T R Parcel No. l()]d000S'/6 Krol(K//{;J Th.Bros: New {(A)/}3 RDP __ Basin l,-(}L Council District /) Charge No .. __________ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notified on aj~}l O I by: ~phone __ letter __ in person -ll'f1):r 'f.\-1-c ~~~ LJM TD12-t-J6"P TD ~IE\AJ A......i.o vJ1lL iAP:':. 1-2..w1=:;:.1<~ DJSP0SJ1'10N: Turned to__,/{_ on /Z-124to/ by~R: No further action recommended because: _ Lead agency has been notified:. _____________________ --'----- --Problem has been corrected. __ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: • -SEE FILE# Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: ___ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. _ __oOther (Specify): DATECLOSED: (0; 'l.1..-;01.-By: --# I' ll0-5 ce.-n eo « ec'Tc'.cl ----------------..... • • • COMPLAINT NO. 200 l-0805 Investigated By: Virgil Pacampara DETAILS OF INVESTIGATION I responded to a flooding during a storm event on 12/13/01 at 4:30 -PM. The intersection of 149111 PL. SE and SE l39rn PL. was flooded_ The water level at the facility D90515 (Briar Hills #4) was very high but not overflowing to the spillway. The facilify was a by-pass pond. The pond was functioning well, the water was flowing through the control structure and unto the orifice. The three catch basins at the intersection of the road were overflowing and surface water was flowing onto the road and by passing the pond. It seems that either it is clogged or too much water coming from J49TH PL. SE and SE 139rn PL. The water level was approx. 4-6 inches. It seems that there were too much water going to CB-4. I observe the great amount of water coming out from the 3 catch basins despite the pond was worldng. I spoke with Engr. Brian Slates with regards to the condition of the flooding. The surface water has not reached the houses around the area. It just stayed within the edge of the lawn and side walks. I also notice that the two llatcb basins lid/cover was removed from the frame. The KC Roads personnel arrives at around 7:00 PM and installed the sign ('Water on the roadway") at the upstream and downstream of the 149m PL. SE. I return to the site to check the condition of the flooding and the water had receded_ I spoke with Mr. Taylor with regards to the water at their basement. He informed me that the water has reached their heater. I went to the crawl space and notice that the water was gone The heater was working. It seems that the water that impacted the crawlspace and the heater did not come from the surface water but from the ground water seeping unto the crawlspace. The clearance from the crawl surface and the base of the heater was approx. 2"-4". I walked and drove to the upstream and found that there was a large drainage facility that was discharging water downstream_ The drainage facility was part of the new large development that was being constructed at SE 128m ST. It seems that the water from this fucility was discharging much amount of water that may have contributed to rise of the water level of the pond (090515). The amount of water discharge from the new development has to be address in the future that may impact the facility D90515. The facility is located within the Renton jurisdiction. I reported the clogged catch basin at the intersection of 149rn PL_ SE and SE 139™ PL-KC Roads drainage hot line. SEE FACILITY SKETCH • • Fm: Len Juhnke RE: Engineering Review for complaint #2001-0805 Complainant: Kenneth Taylor Background 14920 SE 139th Place Renton, WA 98102 Called compainant who said problem had already been corrected. Findings Checked with Drainage Investigator, Virgil Pacampara, with regards to complaint. Found out the ' problem was corrected on 4/29/02 by removing debris from the control structure and removing the trash rack at the outlet from CB2 to the pond of facility D90515. NDA Impact Score= N/A Options and Discussion Proposed Solution File should be closed as problem corrected. NDA Priority Score= NIA -"~-·.. ···---- K!NG COUNTY WATER AND LAND RESOURCES DIVISION DRAINAGE lfl. ... f'ESTIGATION REPORT 1.,.,_p=:, INVESTIOATIONR.EQUEST ~'11 ~ Vff Type IA)Q C · -ROBLEM: 'CEIVEDBY: Date: FILE No. 2002 -• ooe Received from: (Day) <VJ;)) NAME:_ G ~-·-<~,..,. ~·~~----PHONE ;lJ/-7t.fht/ (Eve) ADDRESS: _________________ City _______ State __ Zip __ _ I {.;/0 /q I 1,;[5M {l/lJf,, Access Permission Granted 0 Call First (Would Like To Be Present) 0 LOCATION OF PROBLEM, IF DIFFERENT: ~ c£ ~ rxkc:WY) ~ 01 (JtMm, dN1vn ~ ~ &L ~ a,j__J Plat name: r+ ~ Other a encies involved: Lot No: Block No: .._..._,._ _.f£._ ~ 5- y. s T R Parcel N.o. 51 (j,/J-Ct);y J(Ki:011 'i/O Th.Bros: New 0,50 \ ),3 RDP RESPONSE: Basin /,/;f Council District { p-City __ ~ Charge No. _______ _ Citizen notified on ---,-----by: __ . phone __ letter _,_ in person DISPOSITION: Turned to ~n L I / /) l---b~: No further action recommended because: Lead agency has been notified: · V Problem has been corrected, __ No problem has been identified, __ Prior investigation addresses problem: °"f"," . . SEE FILE # __ _ • Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: ___ Water originates onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. DATE CLOSED: ·i 110105 By:~ __ Other (Specify): '}JV~~ rDG7Ufr: ) • • • Memo Date: January 29, 2003 Complaint Number: 02-0599 (Smith) From: Cameron Chapman Regarding: Closing of file 02-0599 This complaint was regarding (veggie) oil in a catch basin, reported by Grant Smith from KC Roads. The problem is long gone. Virgil P. found nothing and neither did I. It is not apparent whether Roads ever cleaned out the CB, as the basin is (still) filled with sediment. Either way, it has rained considerably since the time of the complaint, so it is probably a moot point. I smelled the water in the catch basin and it seemed normal. I stenciled the catch basin with Dump No Waste. There is nothing else to do and I am closing this file. Cameron Chapman ,:; . .fl r,,D KING COUNTY WATER AND LAND RESOURCES DIVISION A f (\,~.,,.--V~7 /'7 DRAINAGE INvESTIGATION REPORT ( ?0..J 7:> INVESTIGATION REQUEST . .. Type FG f<:.- t OBLEM: r C I C>"-'D oµ s ( .-z:.. 2--Io • o1i;J CEJVED BY: 1-lAN (AJ QC-Date: 2 £ 0 3 OK'd b : FIL~ No. 2003 - Received from: /<CDOT NAME: 0Yl 0 /2-, s /<.E:N (Day) ( LfZ-5) PHONE Z.3 f" -'f:3G 7 (Eve) ,._( _ ____, ADDRESS: /4 Cf ?,, 0 /]C/~1,-. fL S,c. City ______ State __ Zip --- LOCATION OF PROBLEM, IF DIFFERENT: It/ oo. s: . ' 1~9 ~ Access Permission Granted D · Call First ·cwould Like To Be Present) D p~ ~ F;fie ~ ~~. ~~J~~~- ; ~ --6 ~ RDP RESPONSE: ~~nd~ Lot No: Block No: .t..=....L -5;-Parcel No. /Q]J.02/)5<-/0 Kroll '6///J Th.Bros: New _fil 7,{}.3 Basin l C)t_ Council District _,(b_. __ City ___ Charge No. _______ _ Citizen notified on ______ by: __ . phone __ letter __ in person DISPOSITION: Turned to on / / by __ OR: No further action recommended because: . -t<JLead agency has been notified: )r o~~ vVIA-,,,,JT:; 50rc 1/-Jz._. C ('S __ Problem has been corrected. __ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: SEE FILE# __ _ a-Private problem -NDAP will not consider because: W ___ Water or~es onsite and/or on neighboring parcel. DATECLOSED: tf-1 t!f{;3 By: ~ __ Other (Specify): lJZo745 · Citizen Action Request Request taken via Request Details ¥i, // U/( ® King County . Department of Transportation :Z) Request No: Request Date / .;_ 2 U Time / '-/ : 2.. , 2003 Oa.m. .m. ge,9uest fo,ded to: --,;:: /Y .3D ~ IPU I. DIV Dispatched to,,fLLcll":...'ECA"'-'-='------------- 1J ~ -Ba.m. Time Ref'd -'-f-•-->=-.(,_ D p.m. Above this b tUttlce Use Below this llne for Fleld Use Initial Investigation by \T. Ira f•o c,.J' "'=-,,., ±J . Req. Type_fl_ Investigation Date / • .J·t , 2003 /ye "1 ·tte) 1ut.J fn,/,~//., )lc.k, c(' Findings/Action Taken u1,, f /.,. 7~ pl?! i / . r I . .J I I Refer'd to ,·, RPU ----'<-- 01her PU dr Agency Work Scheduled_· __ ,_/_/"'-1-"-,,-"-,'-'b..,_ __ _ Month/Task Responding Pit __ -~'-""-"c'-·-·_,· '-'-----------Date Ref'd ___ ..'-'(. _____ , 200_ Second Invest. by ___________________ _ Date Recv'd _________ , 200_ Action Taken -:'-'ll;,..'..._,: ..... ,,.,.~\l"';,..,__~~"""'·>s..:::'..::·J)"---?''-.. ---L-+j_,_ __ · .. -"'I""::>'-<.Ll\ w-r·u, 1-1';,..;..) ______________ _ ( "7' . • 9. ..... CONTACT LOG Wr-6 Task Completed Request Type ·0 Date Closed, __ ~/--__,_~_-'-'--, 200..,J Mode Date .Ae of Request Choices ~bandQned/Com'I Vehicle B. Utility Inspection C Contract/Overlay issues 0. Drainage E. Debris or Hazard on Roadway F. Flooding Property (E) Emall (I) In person (NJ Note (letter) (U) Unable to contact (VJ Voice Malf G. Guardrail/Fence Damage H. Spill Cleanup (General) M. Illegal Use of R/W S. Street Maint./Sweep N. Shoulder Maintenance T. Trash/Litter on R/W 1. Inquiries RE: Maint. Activities 0 Misc. Requests U. Snow/Ice J. Spray Application K. Washout Repair/Slide Removal P. Pothole V. Water on Road/Flooding Q. Sidewalk/Curb. Maint. W. Lid Missing (C/B, Util.) L. Vegetation Control (Mow, Brush, etc.) R. Repair StreeVPaving X. Ditching 0917jRev. 12/02) White Copy (Closure) Canary Copy (PU) Pink Copy (Scheduling) Goldenrod Copy {Cata Entry) Y. Bridge Issues -. KING COUNTY WATER AND LAND RESOURCES DMSION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT '~v -12. .BLEM: ""Dtv,-1,.JP,Gc.£ RECEIVED BY: [__ br,---cT( tdf Received from: INVESTIGATION REQUEST Date: l ~ / tf03 OK'd by: FILE NO, (Day) c4?S1 PHONE 2 3 'i° -4 .:f {,. 7 Type ;:CR._ 2003 -{£<Is (Eve) ,._( _ ____,_) City /fuv-rc/,-v State,b(;,¢ NAME: Kc:")U TJJyLo e ADDREss: /4 fzo ..Se-I~ ;:iL. ' Zip tfP>?' LOCATION or PROBLEM, IF DIFFERENT: Access Permission Granted D Call First (;o~ld Like ~o ~e P;esent) D 11fi.0cr 17,:f Y. ~=--zic-Zc.#t#l~ Platname: 0105{5 ~JlJ}o=lf4 Other a encies involved: e:J,-:::- Lot No:, Block No: s Th.Bros: New b5"'j,) RDP Basin lCJ.. Council District / J City Charge No. _______ _ RESPONSE: Citizen notified on aj I l \1';L . by:·~ ,Ph?.ne __ letter __ in P<:rson . ~ u.J/J... IA.,(.,';: :T 14.-~u,.,-ct.,~ ·~. +-Le../.. 'f'~ l,). ~ 1<-S sit.~\ ()' ~ Ov«-, t.b1,V 4o 51kt.A-. ~ ~ t.v ~ -£~ , -,. f. fKif ~ Sp~ Pt,crvel?(' e,.,0ort: et . ~· (o "--o ..K.<.. I r DISPOSITION: Turned to on _ _,_/_~/,___ by __ OR: No further action recommended because: _· _ Lead agency has been notified: ________ _:_ _______________ _ _ Problem has been corrected. _ No problem has been identified. __ Prior investigation addresses problem: SEE FILE# Private problem -NDAP will not consider becau.se: W. ater originates on.site::pd/o on eighboring parcel. -t' 0th. er (Specify};_ · ,,_ _ __.;;, DATE CLOSED: / 2-, I/ P5 By: . · ~U!f M'-V &i2oJ-i..A w.,,-"'°"'- / ~ ff) fR.e>,; I bA KING COUNTY DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT .FIELD INVESTIGATION NAME: Ken Taylor ADDRESS: 14920 SE 139th Pl, Renton, 98059 PHONE: 425-235-4367 TH. BROS PG: 656J3 KROLL PAGE: 811 MAINT. DIV: 4 INITIALS:MAG On site December 5, 2003. At the time of my visit it was precipitating heavily and the pond and control structure were working at well. The inlet to the control structure had some moderate debris on the trash rack. This debris did not disrupt flow to the control structure. The inlet to the pond was running at normal capacity for the conditions at the time of inspection. The Emergency spillway for this pond spills over the control structure onto 149•• PL SE. On November 19, 2003 the area experienced significant precipitation. I could find no defects at the time of my inspection to indicate a blockage in the control structure or catch basins down stream from this facility . • NTS CB-2 • .... i 1J r (/) m SE 139th Pl • • • TerraServer Image Courtesy of the USGS Send To Printer O''----'--......_ _ _., 200M 0'--.___.__.__. 200yd Image courtesy of the 4.t$. Geological Survey Page I of 1 Change to Landscape © 2004 Microsoft Corporation . Terms. of Use Privacy Statement http://terraserver.microsoft.com/Printlmage.aspx?T=4&S=11&Z=l0&X=l408&Y=13 l46&... 9/2/2005 • • • + MILE N ! . -~~ 1 ··:\-L"l+ ~. n~-~ ~ ··~:,. ·r-: I_~ .,, •• , y T he boundaries of the sensitive areas dis- played on these maps are approximate. Additional sensitive areas that have not been mapped may be present o n a devel - opment proposal site. Where d ifferences occur between what ts Illustrated on these maps and the site conditions, the actual pre- se n ce or absence on the site of the sensitive area • as defined In the Sensitive Area Ordinance -Is the legal control . r • -... J. ._ "· ,,,,.,.. (_/--......,, .. ~~ -., ,: . .. -~. . . ,. ··,·1~ L --1' • ,. ' ~-~~~4 --q , \~ 1"-.. ~ ·-:___,~1.. ., li...,..l 1 ~ : ··-,~ '-, . :·_,t "'Cr-, ~ I.' I'. V"-" r , , • / · • \ • , .• ..cr,;r 1 r.:--, ,1 · I ,., , .. ,.,. .. , One-hundred-year floodplains extend be· s d 10(} yonel those shown on maps, Flood In-_ surance Rate Maps Clo not always Show the treams an flooelplaln to the headwaters of streams. year Floodplains 9 • • • • • • • • 1/2 + N 0 MILE The boundaries of the sen sitive areas dis- played on these maps are approximate • Additional sensi tive areas that have n o t been mapped m ay b e present on a devel - o pment proposal site. W h ere differences occur between what Is I llu strated on these maps and the site conditions, t h e ac tual p re- sen ce or absence on the site o f the sensitive area · as defined in the sensitive A r ea Ordinance . Is the legal cont rol. '"' .... ._, ~ r--:,, <·, ···r·!:--~~·~ './/~._/ \-.\ : ~<~~ ', . r-·· ~hese coal mines have had addltlonal min- Ing since the most recent map was flied with the Washi ngton Department of Natural Re- sources. AnY develo pment that occurs adJac:ent to th-areas shoul d be preceded by a thorough study to co nfirm or deny the e x i stence of additional subsurface tunnels. ·.' _L . ,. .. ~. <t -j:::)::: ·~ ~'-·"- '--i.· ~~ • ;:y.,. ~ "':= , . . . _,. . \ i ·; .. ' t, " . ~ . ,. .'t . I I ..... •. c ·· ...... -.· . .r -.. .:t· ... ' ..... i .. }: /j .. _ ... -:___,_~·· ~ r .c-;;,--- ,-'.>--\ . '! ·~ -~ , . ~ • • 4 . ..... ~·· \ l . (\. -·~ >C :, 9 u " ' ; ' •' ~ . -~-'-t . ~-: ~ -I I i a' I-· ~ 0 -~. / ,, ', l ~. ..._ ...... ~ -· .,: ~~-·<J :T ,¥;).,. ' ~-·•;. • .•,. I I . " ' .~-..-~"-, 'I • · .• •, -t-' '\ f . • ,,..:: J._ ..• -• t · .. t " ! ,_ ,. -~ \ ~. \·: .:.. :-, ~ I :" !; " " ·y.--..,r' .-.'"~ ,...,. . ·,1(/ .I.I ~· :' . ~~· . ··-.,~·+ f .. ? \ Ir . '~ -~-• I ,J '"' '--' ,. • . \'.. . . . ·' 1. ' ff ., , 4--r ',;,. ,.i,.,r·"' ~r -.;.~·.~.·r -~-... -:_:~ . . . . . ' . . .I ' : .• -' _.,, I I. I • • • '... . .'; . . . ... Issaquah "' ' 9 \ \ \ • ··,,~ • MILE + N 1/2 0 • The boundaries of the sensitive areas dis- played on these maps are approximate . Additional sensitive areas that have not been mapped may be present on a devel- opment proposal site. Where differences occur between what Is illustrated on these maps and the site conditions, the actual pre- sence or absence on the site of the sensitive area -as defined In the sensitive Area Ordinance -Is the legal control . ', Erosion Hazard Areas Issaquah ·7 \ •• -. l C s:-::--: ~ ... -...,,-. 9 • • 1/2 0 • + MILE N The boundaries of the sensitive areas dis- played o n these maps are approximate . Addit ional sensitive areas that have not been mapped may be present on a devel- opment proposal site. Where differences occur between what Is Illustrated on these maps and the site cond itions, the a c tual pre- sence or absence on the site of the sensitive area · as defined i n the Sensitiv e Area Ordinance • Is the l egal control. r '. 'I y ' \ J \ i i ,. $ • • I~• • o I Seismic Hazard Areas . ,. <t ~--._ t~ -~ ~ . _f '0 ;,I 19 l5 ~t·· "\;. . z . C' . --:!lo ,.,.., ..... ~ ~ -· ~- ;g f ,.. 30 ~ .. --:._ - .. i l · ,r.; . '. i }i t ,,.f I . ~::::·r -.,,:...,a;_,.:~ ,_,~--~ .... )17 l ... ;· '. "'< J','~ ·. . .. : . L, ·j ; '• ..:+: . > : =,·,~¢-- ~ _de~:-:-: -\ , I; r ,, . . "' :¥ . r. .. ~ : I 1,.: ----.!I. -r ;_ I ' : 111'1 i ~ ·-: /'-1 ~ .> . --;--. ·-~ t : .. / \...-: . .J\-:. ; .. ,' '. i .f ,-·•-. .r-· : ; l ,: .. ,_ . •. ·, , I .-I-• ,·. i, i .-,,1 .. --.. \ .. ·\. ..~,; . .-<""-} 4 ·.,~· .. ' ,·· -, ' .\ '· I \ {; '. )$ \, J> :~-""l;-/ ,1 A/ ~ ' •.' ' ,.. ,· h+;.· .\I T ,J I " . .....,_ .. '-! -. . -L .. . < ,4' , /-\. ' ) ~. ~I o --. < ·---r '--.: . \ ...,,...... ' ~ ' ,.. '+--~--; -;; ... ,ct -:.., .... · :_· ·· j . I.;~':~ J ·\. .. ' ... '-l. · I • •. I • • ti I '; ,.., .... . . :.. - ,. , Issaquah 9 ' ( ' • • 1/2 0 • + MILE N ' ' . /,..._,I ; "!l'$A."-'11"" --L ~~t"-.,...:,.· • ~ t • t I 'I. T he b ounda ries of t h e se n sitive ar eas d is- played on these maps are approximate . Additional sensitive areas that have not been mapped may be present on a devel - opment proposal site. Where di f fer ences occu r between what Is Illustrat ed on these maps and the site condi t ions, the actua l p r e- sence or absence on t he site o f the sensiti ve area -as defined In the Sensitive Area O rdinance -i s the legal control. "-..,, I ' I , I -~·-~ 0 f ! .: ~ I -'a\~{)\ " ••I •I f Landslide Hazard Areas . ' !~ ·-~ -.:1:- -~·· s~ ..,.~ -., '":: ;-i "' . -~ . ' ! , '\. • ,; . ~ ~ I: -.:-- ~ . ,., -~---.. -·· I ~ -.~ -. . -,~~ ., ... ~ _ _; ,i,.t,,. ~ { ,. ~¥ •. ... . ' , I' , " . ' •i '., • ...... ·,~· --~~--- -,-~--: \ . .. /(, I .j t • I t,:I ·. !\ ,• : ~, ,. ( .. _ ... ,-.. , -v·, -'(,:: --~ ,. r ' ··+--· . ~ ''· 1 f •-. : I ~~~• • .• 1-·. .. ,·1. i: . ...,,.... ! . ,' I ~ .. ~-• ~-,/-' .' • .a \ -:..t tf ,. ,, \ ,_ • f:>..._ t · .. :,...-.. " ·, ••. : -,_ • -I I 'I I ·-'-~• l • '\· • , ... ' 1 ~ / ' I '-' :,, ........ -,\/ ·, i)t ,-.,{.J , , )~(\(/ ' T ·' ,-4-·,. ·' ~ • ., \•ct • I • • ----:r -~ !• . -;:. ,~ -. -<-···· --. ' ~·~~ -~ I -,\', ,.,...,l't,., \ •<,"i ~·' I ·-' !iv. ~\,. ---...,_ ··r -~/<._ .... --. ---, , , -~ .r ·-I • . ~-I ; .' . ' . it.. ::' "'I ,,,._._,.,_ ' • I j l· ,. . i.:. Issaquah \ 71 , I 9 ., ... ., ... :1 I I I I . i I I I r ' ' '' SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION, GEOLOGIC HAZARD, AND PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT MARTIN PROPERTY King County, Washington Prepared for: Cam West Development, Inc. 9720 NE 120th Place, Suite 100 Kirkland, Washington 98034 Prepared fry: Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. 911 5th A venue, Suite l 00 Kirkland, Washington 98033 425-827-7701 Fax: 425-827-5424 January 27, 2005 Project No. KE04710A (ru~@[gOWrnill) $£? 2,8 2005 K.C. D.D.E.S. I I I . I \. Martin Property . King County, Washington . LO INTRODUCTION Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Project and Site Conditions I. PROJECT AND SITE CONDITIONS This report presents the results of our subsurface exploration, geologic hazard, and preliminary geotechnical engineering study for the proposed new residential development. Our recommendations are preliminary in that project plans are still under development at the time of our exploration and preparation of. this report. The project site location is shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. The existing site features, topography, and approximate locations of the explorations accomplished for this study are presented on the Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 2. The locations of the proposed improvements were not available at the time this report was completed. Therefore, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report should be reviewed and modified, or verified, as necessary once project plans and details are developed. 1.1 Purpose and Scope The purpose of this study was to provide subsurface data to be used in the preliminary design of the project. Our study included a review of selected geologic -literature, excavating exploration pits, and performing geologic studies to assess the type, thickness, distribution, and physical properties of the subsurface sediments and shallow ground water conditions. Preliminary geotechnical engineering studies were completed to formulate our recommendations for site preparation, site grading, house construction, drainage, and paving.' This report summarizes our current fieldwork and offers development recommendations based on our present understanding of the project. We recommend that we be allowed to review project plans prior to construction to verify that our geotechnical engineering recommendations . have been correctly interpreted and incorporated into the design. Additional exploration or design modifications/review may be required to finalize project documentation. 1.2 Authorization Written authorization to proceed with this study was granted by Ms. Sara Slatten of CamWest Development, Inc. (CamWest) by means of a signed copy of our scope of work and cost proposal dated November 9, 2004. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Cam West and their agents for specific application to this project. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering and engineering geology practices in effect in this area at the time our report was prepared. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGB/sn -KE047IOA2 -Projects\2004710\KE\WP Page 1 I I I I . ( I I r I r , I ~ 1. Ma11in Property King County, Washington 2.0 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION Subswface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnica/ Engineering Repol1 Pro;ect and Site Conditions This report was completed with an understanding of the project based on a preliminary plot plan with proposed exploration locations provided to us by Cam West. The plan does not show lot layouts or road locations. Site grading plans were also not available when this report was prepared. The plot plan was used as a basis for Figure 2 of this report. The project site includes one rectangular-shaped parcel currently developed as a rural residential property. The parcel is roughly 3. 69 acres in overall area. A house and barn occupy the eastern portion of the parcel. The north, west, and south property lines border existing CamWest developments currently under construction. The eastern property line borders other rural residential properties. The majority of the property is covered with pasture used for goat, sheep, and horse grazing. Deciduous trees are scattered throughout the property. A small ephemeral wetland exists near the west property line. Overall vertical relief across the site is approximately 24 feet. The property slopes gently to the southwest. The proposed project is anticipated to include construction of residential building lots, access roads, buried utilities, and other typical improvements. The planning for this project was in the conceptual phase at the time this report was written and details such as cut and fill areas and amounts, Jot and street layouts, detention facility locations, etc. were not known. However, we assume that storm water detention facilities will be constructed in the southwest site corner or storm water will be conveyed to the adjacent Cam West development storm water facilities. 3.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Our field study included the planned excavation of nine exploration pits to gain subsurface information about the site. The exploration locations were staked in the field by CamWest during our subsurface exploration. The various types of sediments, as well as the depths where characteristics of the sediments changed, are indicated on the exploration Jogs presented in the Appendix. The depths indicated on the logs where conditions changed may represent gradational variations between sediment types in the field. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the nine exploration pits completed for this study. The number, locations, and depths of the explorations were completed within site and budgetary constraints. Because of the nature of exploratory work below ground, extrapolation of subsurface conditions between field explorations is necessary. It should be noted that differing subsurface conditions may sometimes be present due to the random nature of deposition and the alteration of topography January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGB!sn -KE047IOA2-Projectsl2004710\KE!WP Page 2 I I r I l_ Manin Propeny King County, Washington Subsuiface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnica/ Engineering Repon Pro;ect and Site Conditions by past grading and/or filling. The nature and extent of any variations between the field explorations may not become fully evident until construction. If variations are observed at that time, it may be necessary to re-evaluate specific recommendations in this report and make appropriate changes. 3 .1 Exploration Pits The exploration pits were excavated using a rubber-tired backhoe. The pits permitted direct, visual observation of subsurface conditions. Materials encountered in the exploration pits were studied and classified in the field by a geotechnical engineer from our firm. All exploration pits were backfilled immediately after examination and logging. Selected samples were then transported to our laboratory for further visual classification and testing, as necessary. 4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions at the project site were inferred from the field explorations accomplished for this study, visual reconnaissance of the site, and review of selected geologic literature. The general distribution of geologic units is shown on the field logs in the Appendix to this report. The explorations generally encountered a relatively thick sequence of topsoil and organic weathered soils over medium dense grading to very dense silty sand with gravel and cobbles interpreted as lodgement till. The on-site sediments are mapped as Vashon till deposits on the Geologic Map of King County, Washington by Booth et al., 2002. 4.1 Stratigraphy Grass!I'opsoil A surficial layer of grass and organic topsoil was encountered at the location of each of the exploration pits. This organic layer ranged from approximately 10 to 31 inches in thickness. Due to their high organic content, these materials are not considered suitable for foundation, roadway, or slab-on-grade floor support, or for use in a structural fill. Below the organic topsoil, we encountered loose to medium dense, brown to dark brown weathered soils derived from the underlying lodgement till. This material varied across the site in thickness, density, and organic/root/wood content. It is not considered suitable for foundation support, but may be used at the discretion of the Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESD field representative for support of pavement and structural fill in areas where it contains only minor amounts of organics, and can be compacted to project specifications described in the Preliminary Design Recommendations section of this report. Because of its relatively high organic content, it should not be used as structural fill. January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGBlsn -KE04710A2-Projects\2004710\KE\WP Page 3 I I r r ~ I Manin Property King County, Washington Vashon Lodgement Till --------------~ Subswface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Repon Project and Site Conditions All of our exploration pits encountered medium dense grading to very dense, silty sand with gravel, cobbles, and occasional boulders interpreted as lodgement till. The lodgement till observed in our explorations graded from mottled gray and brown near the surface to gray and weakly to moderately cemented at depth. Lodgement till was deposited at the base of an active continental glacier and was subsequently compacted by the weight of the overlying glacial ice. Lodgement till typically possesses high strength and low compressibility attributes that are favorable for support of foundations, floor slabs, and paving with proper preparation. Lodgement till is silty and moisture-sensitive. In the presence of moisture contents above the optimum moisture content for compaction purposes, lodgement till can be easily disturbed by vehicles and earthwork equipment. Careful management of moisture-sensitive soils, as recommended in this report, will be needed to reduce the potential for disturbance of wet lodgement till soils and costs associated with repairing disturbed soils. 4.2 Hydrology Ground water was encountered in several exploration pits at or near the contact with the weathered soil and lodgement till. Our exploration pits provide a reasonable assessment of ground water conditions that may be encountered during normal construction activities during the middle or beginning of the "wet" season. We expect that increased seepage could occur throughout the site during normal construction activities that begin towards the end of the "wet" season in April. This seepage is representative of interflow. Interflow commonly occurs in areas underlain by lodgement till and originates as surface water that percolates down through the near-surface, relatively permeable weathered soils and becomes trapped or "perched" atop the underlying, relatively impermeable, unweathered lodgement till sediments. Interflow is often a seasonal phenomenon. It should be noted that the presence and depth of seepage at the site may vary in response to such factors as changes in season, precipitation, and site use. 4.3 Laboratory Test Results Laboratory testing on selected soil samples from explorations was completed in accordance with report requirements typically requested by CamWest. 'Laboratory testing results are also included in the Appendix. Moisture content was tested in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM):D-2216. Table 1 summarizes the moisture content laboratory results. Table 1 also provides the depth to bearing soils identified in each test pit: January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. SGB/sn -KE047JOA2 -Projects\2004710\KE\WP Page 4 I . , . I I I I [ I Manin Propeny King County, Washington Table 1 Approximate Ground Surface Depth to Exploration Elevation Bearing Soil Pit (feet) (feet) EP-1 453 2 EP-2 450 2 EP-3 455 2 EP-4 462 3 EP-5 465 3 EP-6 448 3.5 EP-7 453 3 EP-8 457 2.5 EP-9 457 1.5 Subsuiface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnica/ Engineering Repon Project and Site Conditions Approximate Bearing Soil Elevation Existing Moisture Content (feet) (percent)' 451 14.2@3' 448 14.2@3.5' 453 16.3@ 3' 459 14.0@ 3' 462 20.5@3' 444.5 10.9@ 4' 450 12.8@ 3.5' 454.5 15.6@ 3' 455.5 18.4@ 2.5' ' All samples are above optimum moisture content for compaction. The maximum dry density of one soil sample was determined using the modified Proctor test procedure (ASTM:D-1557). The results are as follows in Tab1e·2. Table2 Maximum Dry Density Optimum Moisture Content Sample Location Sample Type (pcf)<'l (percent)(2l EP-1@ 3' Lodgement Till 135.4 7 ''> pcf = pouods per cubic foot. l'> Reported results are corrected for gravel content. January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGB!sn -KE047JOA2-Projects\2004710\KE\WP Page 5 I I I I p L Martin Property King County, Washington Subswface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary G_eotechnical Engineering Report Geologic Hazards and Mitigations II. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS The following discussion of potential geologic hazards is based on the geologic, slope, and shallow ground water conditions as observed and discussed herein. 5.0 SEISMIC HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS Earthquakes occur in the Puget Lowland with great regularity. Most of these events are small and are usually not felt by humans. However, large earthquakes do occur as evidenced by the 2001, .6.8-magnitude event; the 1965, 6.5-magnitude event; and the 1949, 7.2-magnitude event. The 1949 earthquake appears to have been the largest in this region during recorded history and was centered in the Olympia area. Evaluation of earthquake return rates indicates that an earthquake of the magnitude between 5.5 and 6.0 is likely within a given 20-year period. Generally, there are four types of potential geologic hazards associated with large seismic events: 1) surficial ground rupture; 2) seismically induced landslides; 3) liquefaction; and 4) ground motion. The potential for each of these hazards to adversely impact the proposed project is discussed below. 5 .1 Surficial Ground Rupture Generally, the largest earthquakes that have occurred in the Puget Sound area are sub-crustal events with epicenters ranging from 50 to 70 kilometers in depth. For this reason, no surficial faulting or earth rupture, as a result of deep, seismic activity has been documented, to date, in the area of the subject site. Therefore, it is our opinion, based on existing geologic data, that the risk of surface rupture impacting the proposed project is low. 5. 2 Seismically Induced Landslides It is our opinion that the risk of damage to the proposed structures by seismically induced landsliding is low due to gentle slope inclinations that exist on the site. 5. 3 Liquefaction Liquefaction is a temporary loss in soil shear strength that can occur when loose granular soils below the ground water table are exposed to cyclic accelerations such as those that occur during earthquakes. The observed site soils were generally dense and silty and are not expected to be prone to liquefaction. A detailed liquefaction analysis was not completed as a part of this study, and none is warranted, in our opinion. January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, ENC. SGBlsn -KE04710A2-Projects\20047!0\KE1WP Page 6 I . I I I I I I ~ Martin Property King County, Washington 5.4 Ground Motion Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Geologic Hazards and Mitigations The project site is located within a Zone 3 rating for seismic activity on a scale of 1 (lowest) to 4 (highest) based on the Seismic Zone Map of the United States, Figure No. 16-2 in the 1997 edition of the Uniform Building Code (UBC). This zonation is based on past earthquake activity in the Puget Sound region. As such, design recommendations in this report accommodate the possible effect of seismic activity in areas with a Zone 3 rating corresponding to a peak ground acceleration of 0.2g (a Richter magnitude 7.5 earthquake occurring directly beneath the site) in accordance with UBC guidelines using soil type Sc. This soil type corresponds to seismic coefficients: C, = 0.33 and C, = 0.45. Design of the project should also be consistent with 2003 International Building Code (IBC) guidelines. In accordance with the 2003 IBC, the following values should be used: Site Class "C" (Table 1615.1.1) Ss = 125 % (Figure 1516[1]), F, = 1.0 (Table 1615.1.2[1]) S1 = 45% (Figure 1516[2]), F, = 1.4 (Table 1615.1.2[2]) . 6.0 EROSION HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS The sediments underlying the site generally contain silt and fine sand and will be sensitive to erosion, especially in the sloping portions of the site. In order to reduce the amount of sediment transport off the site during construction, the following recommendations should be followed. 1. Silt fencing should be placed around the lower perimeter of all cleared area(s). All silt fencing must be keyed into the existing sub grade a minimum of 6 inches. The fencing should be periodically inspected and maintained as necessary to ensure proper function. 2. To the extent possible, earthwork-related construction should proceed during the drier periods of the year and disturbed areas should be revegetated as soon as possible. Temporary ero_sion control measures should be maintained until permanent erosion control measures are established. 3. Areas stripped of vegetation during construction should be mulched and hydroseeded, replanted as soon as possible, or otherwise protected. During winter construction, hydroseeded areas should be covered with clear plastic to facilitate grass growth. January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGB!sn -KE047JOA~ -Projects\2004710\KE\WP Page 7 l I I I I ~ L Martin Property King County, Washington Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Geologic Hazards and Mitigations 4. If excavated soils are to be stockpiled on the site for reuse, measures should be taken to reduce the potential for erosion from the stockpile. These could include, but are not limited to, covering the pile with plastic sheeting, the use of low stockpiles in flat areas, and the use of straw bales/silt fences around pile perimeters. 5. Interceptor swales with rock check dams should be constructed to divert storm water from construction areas and to route collected storm water to an appropriate discharge location. 6. A rock construction entrance should be provided to reduce the amount of sediment transported off-site on truck tires. 7. All storm water from impermeable surfaces, including driveways and roofs, should be tightlined into approved facilities and not be directed onto or above steeply sloping areas (including cut and fill slopes). 7.0 LANDSLIDE HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS The project site is characterized by gentle slopes with a low landslide risk and no detailed landslide hazard analysis is warranted, in our opinion. January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGB!sn -KE047JOA2-Projects\2004710\KE\WP Page 8 I 1 I I 1 Mart in Property King County, Washington Subsu,face Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations III. PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 8.0 INTRODUCTION Our exploration indicates that, from a geotechnical standpoint, the proposed project is feasible provided the recommendations contained herein are properly followed. The bearing stratum is relatively shallow, and conventional shallow foundations and standard pavement sections should perform well with proper sub grade preparation in most areas. 9.0 SITE PREPARATION Site preparation of building and pavement areas should include removal of all grass, trees, brush, debris, and any other deleterious materials. If the existing structures are not part of future development plans, the structures should be demolished and any remaining foundation elements or buried utilities that are not to remain operational should be removed. All existing fill around structures that are to be demolished should be removed. Existing septic systems that are not to be reused should be decommissioned in accordance with King County Health Department requirements and removed from beneath any areas where structures or paving are planned. If any water wells exist on-site, they should be decommissioned by a licensed well driller in accordance with Washington Administrative Code Section 173-160. If any heating oil storage tanks or other similar structures are present on-site, they should be decommissioned and removed in accordance with applicable Washington State Department of Ecology regulations. Any depressions below planned final grades caused by demolition activities should be backfilled with structural fill as discussed under the Structural Fill section. The existing grass, topsoil, and organic weathered soils should be removed from areas where new buildings, paving, or other structures are planned. These materials will "swell" some 25 to 30 percent upon excavation. The actual observed in-place depth of sod, topsoil, and organic weathered soils at the exploration locations is presented on the exploration logs in the Appendix. After stripping, remaining roots and stumps should be removed from structural areas. All soils disturbed by stripping and grubbing operations should be recompacted as described below for structural fill. Once excavation tci subgrade elevation is complete, the resulting surface should be proof-rolled with a loaded dump truck or other suitable equipment. Any soft, loose, or yielding areas should be excavated to expose suitable bearing soils. The subgrade should then be compacted to at least 90 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density as determined by the ASTM:D-1557 test procedure. Structural fill can then be placed to achieve desired grades, if needed. January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. SGB/sn -KE04710A2-Projects\2004710\KE\WP Page 9 -~1 I r 1 · I I l \ _ ~ Martin Property King County, Washington 9.1 Temporary Cut Slopes Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations In our opinion, stable construction slopes should be the responsibility of the contractor and should be determined during construction. For estimating purposes, however, temporary unsupported cut slopes can be planned at lH: 1 V (Horizontal: Vertical) or flatter in the lodgement ti!L Permanent cut or fill slopes should not be steeper than 2H: 1 V. These slope angles are for areas where ground water seepage is not encountered, and assume that surface water is not allowed to flow across the temporary slope faces. If ground or surface water is present when the temporary excavation slopes are exposed, flatter slope angles will be required. As is typical with earthwork operations, some sloughing and raveling may occur and cut slopes may have to be adjusted in the field. In addition, WISHA/OSHA regulations should be followed at all times. 9.2 Site Disturbance Most of the on-site soils contain substantial fine-grained material which makes them moisture- sensitive and subject to disturbance when wet. The contractor must use care during site preparation and excavation operations so that the underlying soils are not softened. If disturbance occurs, the softened soils should be removed and the area brought to grade with structural fill. 9. 3 Winter Construction Due to the high in-situ moisture content of most of the site soils determined by laboratory testing completed for this study, it will be necessary to dry some of the site soils during favorable dry weather conditions to allow reuse in structural fill applications. If construction takes p\ace in winter, drying is not expected to be feasible, and we anticipate that the lodgement till soils will be unsuitable for structural fill applications. Even during dry weather, site soils excavated for installation of buried utilities might not be suitable for utility backfill under paving or other structures. We recommend budgeting for backfill of buried utility trenches in structural areas with imported, select structural fill. For summer construction, significant, but unavoidable effort may be needed to scarify, aerate, and dry site soils that are above optimum moisture content to reduce moisture content prior to compaction in structural fill applications. Care should be taken to seal all earthwork areas during mass grading at the end of each workday by grading all surfaces to drain and sealing them with a smooth-drum roller. Stockpiled soils that will be reused in structural fill applications should be covered whenever rain is possible. If winter construction is expected, crushed rock fill could be used to provide construction staging areas. The stripped sub grade should be observed by the geotechnical engineer and should then be covered with a geotextile fabric such as Mirafi 500X or equivalent. Once the January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. SGB/sn -KE04710A2 -Projects\2004710\KE\WP Page 10 I I I I , I I , I L. Martin Property King County, Washington Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations fabric is placed, we recommend using a crushed rock fill layer at least 10 inches thick in areas where construction equipment will be used. If desired, planned roadways can be paved with asphalt treated base (ATB) for construction staging as described in the Pavement Recommendations section of this report. 10.0 STRUCTURAL FILL Structural fill may be necessary to establish desired grades. All references to structural fill in this report refer to subgrade preparation, fill type, placement, and compaction of materials as discussed in this section. If a percentage of compaction is specified under another section of this report, the value given in that section should be used. After stripping, planned excavation, and any required overexcavation have been performed to the satisfaction of the geotechnical engineer/engineering geologist, the upper 12 inches of exposed ground should be recompacted to 90 percent of ASTM:D-1557. If the subgrade contains too much moisture, adequate recompaction may be difficult or impossible to obtain and should probably not be attempted. In lieu of recompaction, the area to receive fill should be blanketed with washed rock or quarry spalls to act as a capillary break between the new fill and the wet subgrade. Where the exposed ground remains soft and further overexcavation is impractical, placement of an engineering stabilization fabric may be necessary to prevent contamination of the free-draining layer by silt migration from below. After recompaction of the exposed ground is tested and approved, or a free-draining rock course is laid, structural fill may be placed to attain desired grades. Structural fill is defined as non-organic soil, acceptable to the geotechnical engineer, placed in maximum 8-inch loose lifts with each lift being compacted to 95 percent of ASTM:D-1557. In the case of roadway and utility trench filling, the backfill should be placed and compacted in accordance .with King County codes and standards. The top of the compacted fill should extend horizontally outward a minimum distance of 3 feet beyond the location of the perimeter footings or roadway edges before sloping down at a maximum angle of 2H: 1 V. The contractor should note that any proposed fill soils must be evaluated by AESI prior to their use in fills. This would require that we have a sample of the material at least 72 hours in advance to perform a Proctor test and determine its field compaction standard. We have completed one such test on a representative sample of the lodgement till and the results are included in this report. Soils in which the amount of fine-grained material (smaller than the No. 200 sieve) is greater than approximately 5 percent (measured on the minus No. 4 sieve size) should be considered moisture-sensitive. Use of moisture-sensitive soil in structural fills should be limited to favorable dry weather ·and dry subgrade conditions. The on-site lodgement till contains substantial amounts of silt and is considered highly moisture-sensitive when excavated and used as structural fill. At the time of our exploration program, soil January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGBlsn -KE047I0A2-Projecrsl2004710\KE\WP Page 11 r I I I L I : C l. Martin Property King County, Washington Subsuiface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations moisture content tests indicated that all soils encountered were at moisture conditions above optimum for structural fill use. We anticipate that most excavated lodgement till soils will require aeration and drying prior to compaction in structural fill applications. Construction equipment traversing the site when the soils are wet can cause considerable disturbance. If fill is placed during wet weather or if proper compaction cannot be obtained, a select import material consisting of a clean, free-draining gravel and/or sand should be used. Free-draining fill consists of non-organic soil with the amount of fine-grained material limited to 5 percent by weight when measured on the minus No. 4 sieve fraction and at least 25 percent retained on the No. 4 sieve. 11.0 FOUNDATIONS Spread footings may be used for building support when they are founded on approved structural fill placed as described above, or on the glacial sediments that are prepared as recommended in this report. Based on our observations, suitable foundation bearing soils are expected approximately 1.5 to 3.5 feet below the existing ground surface on each lot. The depth to suitable foundation bearing soils is presented in a table in the Subsurface Conditions section of this report. If existing fill is discovered around existing structures, it should be removed and replaced with structural fill, which is also suitable for foundation support. For residential structures, footings may be designed for an allowable foundation soil bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf) including both dead and live loads. Detention vault foundations excavated into dense native till can be designed with a 6,000 psf maximum allowable soil bearing pressure. An increase of one-third may be used for short-term wind or seismic loading. Perimeter footings should be buried at least 18 inches into the surrounding soil for frost protection. However, all foundations must penetrate to the prescribed bearing stratum and no foundations should be constructed in or above loose, organic, or existing fill soils. In addition, all footings must have a minimum width of 14 inches for one-story structures, 16 inches for two-story structures, or 18 inches for three-story structures. Anticipated settlement of footings founded as recommended should be on the order of '.)4 inch or less, with differential settlement of 1h inch or less. However, disturbed material not removed from footing trenches prior to footing placement could result in increased settlements. All footing areas should be inspected by AESI prior to placing concrete to verify that the foundation subgrades are undisturbed and construction conforms to the recommendations contained in this report. Such inspections may be required by King County. Perimeter footing drains should be provided as discussed under the section on Drainage Considerations. January 27, 2005 · ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGB!sn -KE047IOA2-Projects\2004710\KE\WP Page 12 I I i- i I ~ l __ Martin Property King County, Washington Subswface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations It should be noted that the area bounded by lines extending downward at lH: 1 V from any footing must not intersect another footing or intersect a filled area which has not been compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM:D-1557. In addition, a l.5H:1V line extending down and away from any footing must not daylight because sloughing or raveling may eventually undermine the footing. Thus, footings should not be placed near the edge of steps or cuts in the bearing soils. 12.0 FLOOR SUPPORT If crawl space floors are used, an impervious moisture barrier should be provided above the soil surface within the crawl space. Slab-on-grade floors may be used over medium dense to very dense native soils, or over structural fill placed as recommended in the Site Preparation and Structural Fill sections of this report. Slab-on-grade floors should be cast atop a minimum of 4 inches of pea gravel or washed crushed rock to act as a capillary break. The floors should also be protected from dampness by covering the capillary break layer with an impervious moisture barrier at least 10 mils in thickness. Floor slabs that are supported by site soils prepared in accordance with the Site Preparation section of this report or by structural fill should experience 1/2 inch or less of settlement. 13.0 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS All footing walls, basement walls, and retaining walls should be provided with a drain at the footing elevation. Drains should consist of rigid, perforated, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe surrounded by washed pea gravel. The level of the perforations in the pipe should be set at the bottom of the footing at all locations and the drain collectors should be constructed with sufficient gradient to allow gravity discharge away from the buildings. In addition, all foundation walls taller than 3 feet should be lined with a minimum 12-inch-thick washed gravel blanket provided to within 1 foot of finish grade that ties into the footing drain. Roof and surface runoff should not discharge into the footing drain system but should be handled by a separate, rigid, tightline drain. In planning, exterior grades adjacent to foundations should be sloped downward away from the structures to achieve surface drainage. These recommendations apply to conventional shallow foundation walls and landscape walls less than about 4 feet tall. One should refer to the following section for walls up to 12 feet tall. January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGB!sn -KE0471DA2 -Projec/s\2004710\KElWP Page 13 r I I i I r I I ~ I_ Martin Property King County, Washington Subswface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations 14.0 CAST-IN-PLACE RETAINING WALLS AND BASEMENT WALLS All backfill behind foundation walls or around foundation units should be placed as per our recommendations for structural fill and as described in this section of the report. Horizontally backfilled walls, which are free to yield laterally at least O .1 percent of their height, may be designed using an equivalent fluid equal to 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). Fully restrained, horizontally backfilled rigid walls that cannot yield should be designed for an equivalent fluid of 50 pcf. Walls with sloping backfill up to a maximum gradient of2H:1V should be designed using an equivalent fluid of 55 pcf for yielding conditions or 75 pcf for fully restrained conditions. If parking areas are adjacent to walls, a surcharge equivalent to 2 feet of soil should be added to the wall height in determining lateral design forces. As required by the 2003 IBC, retaining wall design should include a seismic surcharge pressure in addition to the equivalent fluid pressures presented above. Considering the site soils and the recommended wall backfill materials, we recommend a seismic surcharge pressure of 4H and 8H psf where H is the wall height in feet, for the "active" and "at-rest" loading conditions; respectfully. The seismic surcharge should be modeled as a rectangular distribution with the resultant applied at the midpoint of the wall. · The lateral pressures presented above are based on the conditions of a uniform backfill consisting of excavated on-site soils, or imported structural fill compacted to 90 percent of ASTM:D 0 1557. A higher degree of compaction is not recommended as this will increase the pressure acting on the walls. A lower compaction may result in settlement of the slab-on-grade or other structures supported above the walls. Thus, the compaction level is critical and must be tested by our firm during placement. Surcharges from adjacent footings or heavy construction equipment must be added to the above values. Perimeter footing drains should be provided for all retaining walls as discussed under the section on Drainage Considerations. It is imperative that proper drainage be provided so that hydrostatic pressures do not develop against the walls. This would involve installation of a minimum 1-foot-wide blanket drain to within 1 foot of finish grade for the full wall height using imported, washed gravel against the walls. 14.1 Passive Resistance and Friction Factors Lateral loads, can be resisted by friction between the foundation and the natural glacial soils or supporting structural fill soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the buried portions of the foundations. The foundations must be backfilled with structural fill compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density to achieve the passive resistance provided below. We recommend the following design parameters: January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGB!sn -KE047IOA2 -Projects12004710\K£\WP Page 14 I . I I [ I I r r I i- i I h C I I. Martin Property King County, Washington • Passive equivalent fluid = 250 pcf • Coefficient of friction = 0.35 Subsuiface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Design Recommendations The above values are allowable and include a safety factor of at least 1.5. 15.0 PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS The pavement for this project is expected to be supported by medium dense, silty sand (lodgement till), recompacted, inorganic weathered soils, or structural fill soils. These soils should be suitable, with proper preparation, to allow the use of standard paving sections. Because some of the site soils were substantially above optimum moisture content at the time of our exploration program, remedial subgrade preparation might be required below the paving. Remedial preparation measures could include removal of some of the existing site soils below the planned pavement section and restoring the planned subgrade elevation with select imported structural fill, treating the native soil subgrade y.>ith Portland cement to stabilize the wet soils, or aeration and drying of existing soils prior to compaction of the road subgrades. We recommend that the final determination of how to prepare the road subgrades be made at the time of construction when weather and field conditions are known. The King County standard paving section for residential access streets is 2 inches of Class B asphalt concrete paving (ACP) above 3 inches of A TB above 6 inches of gravel borrow. All depths given are compacted depths. All paving materials, base course materials, and placement procedures should comply with suitable standard specifications such as the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction or other suitable specifications. All structural fill and all native subgrades less than 4 feet below finished grade for a planned roadway should be compacted to 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density as determined by ASTM:D-1557. Prior to structural fill placement or to placement of base course materials over native subgrades, the area should be proof-rolled under the observation of AESI with a loaded dump truck or other suitable equipment to identify any soft or yielding areas. Any soft or yielding areas should be repaired prior to continuing work. If desired, ATB can be used to provide a construction working surface. After the buried utilities are in place, the subgrade is prepared, the gravel borrow is placed, and the A TB is laid and compacted. This ATB surface is then used for construction access, and once most of the heavy construction traffic has subsided, any damaged pavement areas are repaired prior to final surfacing with ACP. January 27, 2005 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. SGB!sn -KE047JOA2 -Projects\20047101KEIWP Page 15 I I I r I; I Manin Property King County, Washington Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and . Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Repon Preliminary Design Recommendations 16.0 PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MONITOR1NG At the time of. this report, site grading, lot layouts, structural plans, and construction methods have not been finalized, and the recommendations presented herein are preliminary. We are available to provide additional geotechnical consultation as the project design develops and possibly changes from that upon which this report is based. We recommend that AESI perform a geotechnical review of the plans prior to final design completion. In this way, our earthwork and foundation recommendations may be properly interpreted and implemented in the design. We are also available to provide geotechnical engineering and monitoring services during construction. The integrity of the foundations for buildings and of new pavement depends on proper site preparation and construction procedures. In addition, engineering decisions may have to be made in the field in the event that variations in subsurface conditions become apparent. Construction monitoring services are not part of the current scope of work. If these services are desired, please let us know and we will prepare a cost proposal. We have enjoyed working with you on this study and are confident that these recommendations will aid in the successful completion of your projegt. If you should have any questions or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Kirkland, Washington Susan G. Beckham, P.E. Project Engineer Attachments: Figure 1: Figure 2: Appendix: January 27, 2005 Vicinity Map Site and Exploration Plan Exploration Logs Laboratory Test Results SGB/sn -KE04710A2 -Projecrs\2004710\KE\WP I Pl'IMI 11/20/ fXo Kurt D. Merriman, P.E. Principal Engineer ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Page 16 .... It) ~ !:2 UJ .... .... a: 0 ,.._ ::::> UJ g UJ C) ~ UJ ;j_ u:: :x: z< (.) 0 0 (/) z 0 -; z 0 a: a. ..,... F ,_ "Cl C) V) N 3$ ...... ~ NJ Hl()qr r-. UJ ..... (/) ..-i w i= \I)~ ,.... r-UJ ,...., VI LC) (/) (t) 3S A'tf Hl8vI z 0 I-::i:: t- c.. ~~ t-VI t- ~ VI <( 0:: ~ ,rl :E ~ Cl) 3S fl'rl t-QJ~lvr 3$ A'tf I/) 0~ ~f-UJ zz~ t-t-l/) --z VI 1/) 0 I-:> ..... N ~ -0:: 0 ,rl > <o ~ (!) z S2 u ~ C .: G u ~ C ti u II) .c e .. .. d w .,, ~ G .. d u 0 .. rm .. < JP:,'A!IUPfll OW•O\U!)JBW OW•O I. r ' r ~ ;s 1-a ' • 1 d 0 L i ~ " en 0 1;l 0 z C 0 'O " C s &! .!<! ·a V, 'O " C '" i3 ,J, 1! " 0 0 " > " en 0 0 "' 0 z 0 " 0 0 " 0.. " 5 :, ...? 'if'. 0 "' .!<! ·a "' 0 ,, C " V, 0 "' e 0 0:, >, ~ .!!! 0 Oo Well-graded gravel and GW gravel with sand, little to no fines GP Poorly-graded gravel and gravel with sand, little to no fines Silty gravel and silty GM gravel with sand Clayey gravel and GC clayey gravel with sand Well-graded sand and sw sand with gravel, little to no fines Poorly-graded sand SP and sand with gravel, little to no fines SC Silty sand and silty sand with gravel Clayey sand and clayey sand with gravel Silt, sandy silt, gravelly silt, ML silt with sand or gravel CL Clay of low to medium plasticity; silty, sandy, or gravelly clay, lean clay Organic clay or silt of low OL plasticity Terms Describing Density Relative Density and Consistency SPT12lblows/foot Coarse- Grained Soils Very Loose Loose Medium Dense Dense Very Dense a to4 410 10 10 to 30 30 to 50 >SO Test Symbols G = Grain Size Fine- Grained Soils Consistency Very Solt Soft SPT121 blows/foot 0102 2 to 4 M = Moisture Contenl A = Atterberg Limits C = Chemical DD = Dry Density Medium Stiff Stiff Very Stiff Hard 4 to B B to 15 15to30 >30 K = Permeability Descriptive Term Boulders Component Definitions Size Range and Sieve Number Larger than 12· Cobbles Gravel Coarse Gr~vel Fine Gravel Sand Coarse Sand Medium Sand Fine Sand Sitt and Clay 3' to 12" 3' to No. 4 (4.75 mm) 3' to 3/4' 3/4' to No. 4 (4.75 mm) No. 4 (4.75 mm) to No. 200 (0.075 mm) No. 4 (4.75 mm) to No. 10 (2.00 mm) No. 1 O (2.00 mm) to No. 40 (0.425 mm) No. 40 (0.425 mm) to No. 200 (0.075 mm) Smaller than No. 200 (0.075 mm) (3 ) Estimated' Percentage Moisture Content Dry -Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch Component Percentage by Weight Trace Few Little With <5 5 to 10 15 to 25 -Non-primary coarse constituents: .:::._ 15% -Fines content between 5% and 15% Slightly Moist -Perceptible moisture Moist -Damp but no visible water Very Moist -Water visible but not free draining Wet -Visible free water, usually from below waler table Symbols Sampler Type Blows/6" or portion of 6" Cement grout surface seal I • Elastic silt, clayey silt, silt 2.0" 00 MH with micaceous or Split-Spoon Sampler Type Description Bentonite seal diatomaceous fine sand or Sampler W,,',1--ji'.'s::'ilt_-;-:-:-,--,--:;--;:-----j (SPl) " • 3.0' OD Split-Spoon Sampler 3.25. OD Split-Spoon Ring Sampler ,., :: Fitter pack with :·:· blank casing :-· section 'O " ,, "' c~ Clay of high plasticity, sandy or gravelly clay, fat clay with sand or gravel Bulk sample • 3.0" OD Thin-Wall Tube Sampler (including Shelby tube) ••• Screened casing • •• or Hydrolip C 'f! (!) ,J, C u: " E .!!! :::i := "C Cl) ·5 C' ~-+-----------! Grab Sample O Portion no! recovered ::J Cl) Percentage by dry weight Organic clay or silt of OH medium to high plasticity (2) (SPl) Standard Penetration Test -'---fi£,,'i6€J--+----------i (ASTM D-1586) ·: with filter pack •• End cap (4) Depth of ground water .Y. A TD = At time of drilling i Static water level (date) 1:-"2 en '5, co =a ·-e>"' Io Peat, muck and other Pl In General Accordance with PT highly organic soils Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (ASTM 0-2488) (SJ Combined USCS symbols used for fines between 5% and 15% Classifications of solls in this report are based on visual field and/or laboratory observations, which include density/consistency, moisture condition, grain size, and plasticity estimates and should not be construed to imply field or laboratory testing unless presented herein. Visual-manual and/or laboratory classification methods of ASTM D-2487 and D-2488 were used as an identification guide for the Unified Soil Classification System. Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~[!j~ Exploration Log Key FIGURE A-1 [. 1· i~ ~ 0 0 N t " • , ~ C -'l ~ "' < 0 ;:: " M .. ~ g £ a. Q> 0 1 - 2 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-1 ' This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AES!) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil grading to loose, moist, dark brown, silty SAND, with gravel roots, cobbles and abundant organics. Till Medium dense, moist, gray mottled, silty SAND, with gravel, cobbles, trace boulders. Dense at 3', lightly cemented and no longer mottled. Very dense below 9'. Bottom of exploration pit at depth 1 a feet No ground water. No caving. Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Logged by: SGB -~ ~ ~ f!j ~ Project No. KE0471 DA 1/12/05 Approved by: I ! I I r ~ 0 0 N :; <' ' ~ t -'I ,< '--" "' 0 ;: ~ 0 M ~ ~ ii LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-2 g £ a. " 0 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences. Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurtace conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil 1 -Weathered Till Loose, moist, brown, silty SAND, with gravel, roots· and organics. 2 Till Medium dense, moist, sl.ightly mottled gray, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. 3 - 4 -Dense below 4' and lightly cemented, few boulders. 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 -Sandier below 8'. 9 - 10 - 11 12 - Bottom of exploration pit at depth 11 feet Slow seepage from north at 5'. No caving. 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - Logged by: SGB Approved by: Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~~~ Project No. KE0471 OA 1/12/05 I. j I' l t I ~ 0 0 N ..: " • , h C ~ ii ,-" ., 0 ~ z M a. ~ g £ C. w 0 1 2 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-3 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read togettier with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. · DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil Weathered Till Loose, moist, brown and dark brown, silty SAND, with gravel roots and organics. Till Medium dense, moist, gray mottled, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. Dense at 4' and weakly cemented. Very dense below 8'. Bottom of exploration pit at depth 8 feet No ground water. No caving. Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc . Logged by: SGB ~la~~~ Project No. KE0471 OA 1/12/05 Approved by: I r I I I 1:::1 L ~ g N ..: ~ ~ -'l <C '!! ;\ ;: ~ 0 M ~ >-!;1 g £ C. <1> 0 1 - 2 - LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-4 This fog is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AES!) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil Weathered Till Loose to medium dense, moist, brown, silty SAND, with gravel roots and few pockets of organics and wood. 3 --4------------------T-il~I----------------- Medium dense to dense, very moist, gray, silty SAND, with gravel, cobbles. 4 - 5 - 6 - ?+------------------------------- 8 -Bottom of exploration pit at depth 7 feet Moderate seepage at 3'. Slight caving 2' to 3'. 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - Logged by: SGB Approved by: Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~ ~ ~ [!i ~ Project No. KE0471 OA 1/12/05 I. I r g ,5 0. " D 1 - LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-5 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil Weathered Till Loose to medium dense, moist, brown, silty SAND, with gravel, trace roots and pockets of organics 2 -and wood. 3 Till Medium dense, moist, gray mottled, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. 4 -Dense below 4', weakly cemented. 5 - 6 - 7 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - Very dense and moderately cemented below 6'. Bottom of exploration pit at depth 7 feet No ground water. No caving. ~-----29----------------------------- · ~----------------------------------------------± i -'l o'. " ~ ~ ~ Logged by: SGS Approved by: Martin Property King County, WA Associated .Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~[!j~ Project No. KE0471 OA 1/12/05 ~ ---------------------------------------------- [. r. I r r :g 1 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-6 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. {AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil Weathered Till Loose, moist, dark brown and brown, silty SAND, with gravel and roots and organics. 2 - 3 - Till 4 -Medium dense, moist, gray, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. Dense at 4', few boulders, sandier with depth. 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 -Very dense below 8'. g - 10 - 11 12 -Bottom of exploration pit at depth 11 feet Slow seepage at 3.5'. No caving. 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - ,:---------------------------------------------- £ " ~ ~ o'. " i ~ ;;' Logged by: SGB Approved by: Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ~~~~~ Project No. KE0471 OA 1/12/05 ~---------------------------------------------- I r 1 ~ 0 0 N i. " • , I C ~ n ~ ~ C <!) ,i 0 ~ • I 0 ~ ~ L-~ s' g ,; 0. Q> 0 1 - 2 - 3 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-7 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, lnc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil Weathered Till Loose to medium dense, moist, brown and dark brown, silty SAND, with gravel roots and organics. Till Medium dense to dense, moist, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. Strongly cemented and very dense below 6'. 8+-------------'------------------------- 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - Bottom of exploration pit at depth 8 feet No ground water. No caving. Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Logged by: SGB ~ ~ ~ fii ~ Approved by: Project No. KE04710A 1/12/05 I l r ' 1-1 C L ~ 0 0 N -f. ~ • , C ~ i'. "' « ~ 0 M ~ ~ !;l g 1 - 2 - 3 - LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-8 This log is part of the report prepared bY Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil Till Medium dense, moist, brown grading to gray, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. 4 Dense and lightly cemented below 3'. 5 - 6 -Very dense below 6'. 7 - 8 9 -Bottom of exploration pit at depth 8 feet No ground water. No caving. 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 14 15 -, . 16 - 17 - 18 19 - Martin Property King County, WA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Project No. KE04710A Logged by: SGB Approved by: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1/12/05 I r I I g 5 Q. " 0 1 - 2 - 3 - LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-9 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation. Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. . DESCRIPTION Sod and Topsoil Medium dense to dense. very moist, gray, silty SAND, with gravel and cobbles. 4 -Mottled and medium dense to 4'. Dense below 4'. 5 - 6 - 7 8 .- 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - Trace boulders, very dense below 5'. Bottom of exploration pit at depth 7 feet Slow seepage at 3'5" from south. Slight caving 2' to 5'. ~-----26-----------------------------~---------------------------------------------- t Martin Property f King County, WA « ~ Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Project No. KE04710A -Logged by: SGB m ~ fl\liiil ~ rc::;:J g Approved by: ~ ~ ~ rn !(;;di 1/12/05 ~---------------------------------------------- I. r r r I I l ) l_ Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Proctor Analysis ASTM D1557 1 D698 Date Sampled Project Project No. Soil Description 12-Jan-05 Martin Property KE04710A Light brown silty SAND with Tested By Location EB/EP No. Depth KWL Eps gravel I Percent passing 3/4" sieve: 83% ASTM D1557 Method C Automatic Tamper A Mold Number 1 2 3 Remarks B Water Added field dry dry C Wt. of Wet Soil + 24.420 24.760 24.500 Mold /lbl D Wt. of Mold (lb) 14.090 14.090 14.090 E Wt. of Wet Soil (lb) 10.330 10.670 10.410 F Wet Density, (pcf) 137.733 142.267 138.800 G Wt. of Pan (lb) 0.735 0.735 0.660 H Wt. of Wet Soil + 11.075 11.925 11.125 Pan /lbl J Wt. of Dry Soil + 9.865 10.920 10.420 Pan (lbl K Wt. of Water (lb) 1.210 1.005 0.705 M Wt. of Dry Soil (lb) 9.130 10.185 9.760 N Moisture Content 13.3 9.9 7.2 '%) 0 Dry Density (pcf) 121.6 129.5 129.4 z For a 6 inch mold: Z = 0.075 For a 4" mold: Z = 0.0333 140.0 Test Results: Optimum Moisture Percentage: 8.5 135.0 Maximum Orv Densitv: 130.0 130.0 Ji, -............ Correction for oversize: ASTM 0471 B ! c;::-125.0 ~ Corrected Moisture Percentage: . 7.0 ~ u ; .!, 120.0 Corrected Maximum Orv Densitv: 135.4 .,, 115.0 Assumed Specific Gravity: 2.7 110.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 moisture content, % ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. 911 Fifth Ave., Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98033 425-827-7701 FAX 425-827-5424 r . d ... ssoc1ate f, te Sampled I 1. .2/2005 Tested By f'JT l I Sample ID. f ·?t Weight+ Pan U y Weight+ Pan Weight of Pan { ?ight of Moisture r:,, y Weight of Soil Yo Moisture I <>·mple ID / at Weight+ Pan Dry Weight+ Pan r•ight of Pan t. aight of Moisture Dry Weight of Soil r Moisture I mple ID lvet Weight+ Pan l'lry Weight + Pan r eight of Pan Weight of Moisture )-y Weight of Soil ( Moisture j ,mple ID ~vet Weight+ Pan Dry Weight+ Pan ' \ eight of Pan \. eight of Moisture Dry Weight of Soil ) _Moisture I:; Earth Sciences, Inc. Project Project No. Martin Pronertv KE04710A Location EB/EP No. EP's EP-1 @3' 2316 2057 227 259 1830 14.2 EP-4@3' 1515 1355 215 160 1140 14.0 EP-6@4' 1528 1400 226 128 1174 10.9 EP-9@2.5' 1502 1300 202 202 1098 18.4 'Depth EP-2@3.5' 1730 1542 221 188 1321 14.2 · EP-5@3' 1256 1080 223 176 857 20.5 EP-7@3.5' 1706 1537 221 169 1316 12.8 Moisture Content ASTM D 2216 Soil Description EP-3@3' 1896 1662 223 234 1439 16.3 A;fA fl..w_J J61/ EP-6 1498 1278 220 220 1058 20.8 EP-8@3' 1510 1336 221 174 1115 15.6 ASSOC/A TED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. 911 5th Ave., Suite 100 Kirkland, WA98033 425-827-7701 FAX425-827-5424 "~~·-""'7"'-,~·~ '~ I 16' X SO" EJ.SEJENT FOR · /--/IICR£SS AND ECllESS 661.26' U? r CULV. OOY UP ------------,._-----~UP -----------<>-' i' I \ -1_ _~ _--r=--~ ------~-~~ _ ~\ -~ ~--. . -~-__-:~_~a_-zt~~-.1 ,,631.25' ~\ / " ·~ I ~· ... :·,:~~-:. ( .'.'i;,. :.,F··}··:"{ 1 ~ CCflC. £-448.6'· CATCH BASIN rop,.'5().'3 IE tr PVC S-448.83 r.W' KNOO(OUT tfa.(.48.7 CATO< BASIN TOP-....... IE 12" P\4C Na-444..84 IE 12" PVC 5-4,44.84 :ii '" ~ l ii }~ '\ I I ·, 0 -~ \ \ \ \ • EP-1 \ \ 0 \ \ \ ~-' ' " \ :'lo'ERT ' \ ~ENO 6" P\IC \ \ / 1'•450.55 . . •..•. ·- \ ~ ~-~ e:,o ,--, ffl~ '.~ '°"Q-;1:g" I 00 ... ( ~-/ . I I i ' \ ' ! ' ,6' \ '\ \ ',\ \ • EP-8 ! ' I ' ! I I ·:i=·:s. ·, . iittt;:.: 12439 1481H AVE. SE I stOOY woa, FRAIIE STRUC1\JRE I K:~!~-:, I ~.-.-;;( ;.:74:2·.· ,.,.,....,. TOP-459.86 E 6'" PVC N•457.99 E S-f1VC S-~OS ' \ ' I ' I I I YARD DRAIN TOP-461.13 E O" CONC N-457.60 E 6" PVC s-457.47 ... UP ._ 16" 1B --/-~---\---f-!!---------- i / I \ \ I \ I \ \ \ • EP-5 \ \ ' \ '\. ' ' \ \ " ~ \ .... ~ ~ 120.~3 O;l ~ 'r -.-' ~ r ~1~;~ L:.4. 8 ,,•"" --------UPI ____ -o- / ! ' \ .EP-2 \ ' / / / \ \ \ \ • EP-3 \ ~ -1~: o"~ He • ~,i:,:-.. WJOO BARN ~ Ha " " ', \ ~ m " tul.>£l<T IE\2"...,_-.20\ CULV'\ "' i ,, ,,, ..... ! \ \ \ i ! I I ·O ' 0 / I \ \ \ / \ \ L,._ ' -----' ' \ \ I i ' ' \ -~, \ \ \ \ 0\ ·, \ \ \ ·, \ \ ·, •, ' '- \ \ ' \ \ \ '· ··., ' ' ' ' ' I ',. I L-~-..J V,000 - ....................... ~, -.. \ ·, \ ' '· \ i ' \ \ \ \ " • EP-4 ' ' ' ' \ \ ' ' I f '' _. \ \ \ '- \ \ ' \ I ' \ \ ~ .... \ lb I o ,z I '~ JO' w rn ~ < ::c ------------li; ~ ... (\ I I I I u I I I ~, ii I I I "' "' I~ ~ " I'° ~ 0 :ii I i J, I ! I r· --\. -fu\ -'-'-'--- ' ·, ·, \ ' '-1-~------~-150'----~---~~ ·•• EP-6 ' \ LEGEND ' '-' 0 ', D[ltH ..• '@: ---- \ \ N ' .......... __ .......... _w.---=-- • EP-7 \ ,_ ---.§. / ---·- ! ' I I :o I Q"-_ rr-- / / ., \ \ / ,_ ---- • EP-9 \ ' ~-"":.'."= 661.06 / 5:..-11 ' --· ' .............. ,. ', = '- I '- \ \ .,, !,/' \ / i I \ ' I \~ ··-··-··-··-··-··-··- I I j I ca a ~ ~QJY '""" l!!YN IB .. ..,. ... N A EP-1 • Approximate location of exploration pit I . . 0 ; ~ f . Reference: Tnad Associates ~======================================;.;~ ~.J Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN FIGURE 2 r m ~ rlliil ~ ~ MARTIN PROPERlY i ~ E ~ LW I.di KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON PROJECT NO. KE04710A '---===--===------------------------------------------------:-----------------------.......:._;;,__ ___ _;;,___ · .. DATE 01/05 ; tQ · King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 · 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov April 6, 2007 Sara Slatten · Carn West Development 9720 NE 1201h Place Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 RE: Permit Fee Estimate Project: Martin Property File Number: L07SR015 Dear Applicant: Thank you for submitting the engineering plans for site development of the Martin Property subdivision. To implement the engineering review process, our office will use a new procedure for managing the permit application to provide applicants with an enhanced level of customer service. A project manager will be assigned to your project to provide a fee estimate for the anticipated scope of review and will also monitor and manage the permit application throughout the review process. Your application for engineering review was received by our office on March 27, 2007 and will be processed using the Project Manager Program. The enclosed information provides a summary of the fee estimate for the anticipated work disciplines and also discusses the submittal process and disclaimers which may affect the final permit fees. The fee estimate includes the scope of work for engineering plan review only and does not evaluate other final plat requirements such · as construction inspection and review of plat recording documents. During our initial screening process of the engineering plans, it was determined that numerous standard design documents for evaluating the plat requirements were not included in the submittal. The design items identified during the screening process are listed as disclaimers on the attached fee estimate form. Due to the missing information, the fee summary is a rough estimate and is subject to modification based upon the fee estimate disclaimers. To provide an efficient process for review of the engineering plans, it is recommended that the missing design · information be addressed in your next submittal with the required fee payment. ,, Sara Slatten April 6, 2007 Page 2 In addition to engineering design documents, our Department must also review and approve the recreation space plan as required by plat conditions. Please be a'Yare that the recreation plan must be submitted to our planning section as a separate permit application with fee payment. For further information regarding the submittal process for recreation plans, please contact Kim Claussen at 206-296-7167. Once the attached fee estimate form is signed and submitted to our Department with the estimated fee payment, your project will be assigned for further review. The enclosed Certification of Applicant Status form must also be included with your next submittal. All fee payments shall be made to the cashier in the DDES permit center using activity number L07SROl 5 and the signed fee estimate and applicant status form shall be mailed to my attention in the Land Use Services Division. · If you have any questions regarding the permit fees or other aspects of the engineering review process, please contact the project manager, Pete Dye via email pete.dye@metrokc.gov or by telephone at 206-296-7185. Sincerely, i~ · Peter Dye, P .E. Senior Engineer Enclosure cc: Rebecca Cushman •' _, ® King County Land Use Services Division Permit Fee Estimate Pre-app Estimate Number: L07SR01S I Date: 04/06/2007 Permit Title: Martin Property Subdivision Permit Type: SITEREVP -Engineering Plan I Based on permit information submitted by the applicant, the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) has determined the amount of review fees for the subject application. The fees shown below do not include ancillary permit fees, recording fees, project-related mitigation fees, or other fees that are passed through to the applicant from other agencies or as part of the project's environmental review. Fixed Fees: Counter Service Fee for Application Intake Tree Retention Review Structural Review (Determined at final approval) Other Fixed Fees Estimate for Hourly Fees: (147 Hours x $144.90) Amount previously paid as deposit Total Fixed Fees: Total Permit Fee Estimate: $205.28 $2,173.50 $ $2,378.78 $21,300.30 -$784.88 $22,894.20 Note: The estimate for hourly fees stated above is based on the total estimated number of hours not to exceed 147 hours for the disciplines listed below, and is calculated using the department's hourly rate in effect at the time the work is performed. Based upon the financial disclosures found on page 2, the number of hours required may be modified. The total estimated hours reflect work performed by the following disciplines: Engineering Review, Survey Coordination, Constructab!lity Review, Project Management, Traffic Review, Planning, and Geotechnica/ Review. After receiving the fee estimate from DDES, the applicant has ninety (90) days to complete the · application submittal. Please call 206-296-6797 to set up an appointment with the Permit Center to complete your application and payment. If the application is not received within ninety (90) days, the applicant may be required to obtain a new fee estimate or this activity may be cancelled. For further questions on this fee estimate or for other requirements about this permit application, please contact Pete Dye via email pete.dye@metrokc.gov or by telephone at 206-296-7185. Peter Dye Senior E gineer Land Use Services Division Project Manager.dot 1/26/04 Page 1 • · ,. @ King County Land Use Services Division Permit Fee Estimate Pre-app Estimate Number: L07SROI5 Date: 04/06/07 Permit Title: Martin Property Plat Permit Type: SITEREVP -Engineering Plan Estimated Maximum Hours: 147 Applicant: Sara Slatten Total Fee: $22,894.20 The following disclaimers are attached and are part of the fee estimate for this permit. The applicant · is required to submit a signed copy of this form with the application and fee payment acknowledging that the applicant has read J_he disclaimers stated beiow. Disclaimer · Applicants are responsible for all fixed fees, reported hours performed in reviewing submittal materials and processing, up to the fee estimate. Changes in the scope of the project ~eview will result in a revised .review fee estimate. Fee estimates are based on information submitted to ODES by the applicant prior to finalization of the permit application. In addition, estimates are determined by utilizing historical data gathered from projects of similar type, size, and scope. The fee estimate will be the maximum fee charged unless the scope of the project changes. Should fewer hours be required to complete the review, then the applicant may receive a refund for those hours. If items are identified that are not originally disclosed or identified later in the process, a new estimate may be required. Applicants will be responsible for any additional hours identified in a new estimate because of: I) Changes in the project and unknown or undisclosed site issues. 2) Incomplete information or errors in applicant submittal. 3) County code fee changes. 4) Fees for structural review. 5) Fees for variance applications. 6) One major and one minor set of redline comments. 7) Construction Bond amount that exceeds $500,000. 8) Tree retention plan not provided per KCC 16.82.156. 9) Street tree plan not provided. 10) Recreation plan not provided. 11) Soil amendment plan not provided per KCC 16.82.100. 12) Water Quality pond does not meet 3: I flow standard. 13) Wall heights exceed maximum height allowed in zoning code -KCC 2 IA.12.170. Keeping review fees at or below the fee estimate will depend on the applicant's commitment to complete the process review. This commitment should include submitting materials which address all County codes, policies, previously approved conditions, and responding to the County's request for corrections or additional information in a timely manner, not to exceed 90 days. Acknowledged: Applicant/Owner Name (print) Date: ___ Applicant/Owner Name (signature) Project Manager.dot I /26/04 Page2 June 29, 2007 Claire Jonson King County DOES 900 Oaksdale Ave SW RECEIVED JUL O 2 2007 KING COUNTY i/R LAND USE SERVICES cf>. /i,V ,, .(;:/. ~ Renton, WA 98055-1219 f';~I J\ . RE: Martin Property Triad Job No. 04-257 (KC #L07SR015) Dear Claire: 12112115thAvenueNE Kirkland, WA 98034-6929 425.821.8448 425.821.3481 fax 800.488.0756 toll free www.triadassoc.com Enclosed is the re-submittal package for the Martin Property road and storm engineering plans consisting of 6 sets of bond copies. In addition to the plan sets, 4 copies of the revised TIR are also included. Each comment provided by you has been responded to in bold italic font for your ease of review. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 425 821-8448. General Comments: 1. Submit structural designs, calculations, and geotechnical report for retaining walls shown over 4' in height. Eate artartge ~lb ~ · 12-- 2. Submit landscape, recreation, and street tree plans. t--Landscape, recrmtion and strttt lrtt plans are included in the submittal set. Please see sheets Ll-L4. -{:!p,n ..,e 5 t.lPMi f-,t-» ~; I"\... ct&,,.()-~? 3. Submit tree retention plan. ,;(" Tl,e tree retention plans has bttn included in the submittal seL Please see sheet LS and L6. 4. Wctpoofracf li~provSe minimum flow path length to width ratio of 3: I without internal berms or walls. V 1'11e pond has been re-configured to obtain the minimum flow pat/, required. 5. v 1 6. I All inlets to W etpool facility shall enter cell I . Tl,e pipe layout has been re-designed to provide all inlets directed to enter cell 1. Delete pipe from CB 16toCB 17. AddpipefromCB 16toCB 18. The design must provide controlled discharge directly into the downstream conveyance system. + Per discussion, CB 17 is tl,e Emergency Overflow structure. In tl,e event that the control structure completely plugs, t/ris structure acts as t/re emergency spillway and is required to provide a safe overflow pathway. {y Submit mailbox location approval by the U.S. Postal Service. I have obtained verbal approval on the /ocatlon oftl,e mail box stand and am awaiting the approved plan. ,,J'. Change all references to 144"' Place SE to 145"' Place SE. The Street has been re-labeled as requested. Land Oevelopment Consultants Page 2 Claire Jonson King County DOES ) June 29, 2007 / Per Traffic Engineer's recommendation the sidewalk ramps should be moved south to line up with each other. The sidewalk ramp located on the south east corner of Street A and SE 125'" Street has been moved to the south to line up better to the ramp located 011 the south west corner of the intersection. Engineering Plans: Sheet 2: ~ Add Hearing Examiner's conditions of final plat approval. V The Hearing Examiner's conditions have been added to .,·heel 2. -Sfh ,;U· 9-- Sheet 3: . ~ Survey control plan shall be stamped, dated, and signed by a licensed PLS in Washington State. The sheet has been renamed and our Surveyor and I have stamped it as requested. ~ Add King County approval block. The KC approval block has been added to this sheet. J. Add IO' existing drainage easement for Lot 35 of Shamrock Heights, Recording No. 20060825000187. The call 0111 for the existing drainage easement has been added. Sheet 4: t,,.Y. Clarify clearing limits, where and what type of fences will be placed. Gray areas shown with orange construction fence are in areas outside of project boundary and on existing lots. This suggests that areas outside of project boundary areas will be cleared. The Plan legend has been updated to provide clarification on the clearing limits. An existing power pole and telephone risers at the northwest comer of project is shown to be relocated. Show where these utilities will be relocated to. The power pole and riser relocations will be coordinated wl PSE and the phone company for locations. i/. Show minimum dimensions of the Riprap pad, see KCSWDM page 4-31. /Yimensions have been added to the rip rap pads. vf{. Provide a list of all applicable wet season requirements see KCSWDM page D-72. Wet season requirements have been added to the plans. / Show the following note: "No construction or site disturbance for this project may begin b~fore y· the applicant first obtains a General Permit to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity permit from the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE). " For more information or application form, please visit DOE ·s web site at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/9937.pdf. This note has been added to the plans as requested. ~ vi. Ad~ Name and Phone of erosion control supervisor on Notice of Construction Activity Sign. See web page http://www.mctrokc.gov/ddes/forms/lg-not-conact.pdf. 11,e name and number has been added to the sign. Page 3 Claire Jooson King County DOES June 29, 2007 ~ /1, Show where existing sidewalk matches new sidewalk. A call-out has bee11 added to clarify the co1111ectio11 poi11ts of the 11ew sidewalk to the existi11g sidewalk. ,/There is an existing storm and culvert shown to be removed near the southwest comer of the project that is outside of project boundary. Provide documentation of consent from property owner that this work can be done. The call out has bee11 modified to keep off of private property. V'~ 9)1' (9 ~~~y foot sag vertical curve on SE 125th St does not meet minimum stopping sight distance. f ;\ This can be mitigated with an installation of street illumination through a variance. See memo ~ dated April 27, 1994 attached. A road varia11ce has bee11 submitted for review a11d approval with this submittal. Change vertical scale to I" = 5'. We do 11ot wi.,h to cha11ge the vertical scale due to two other jurisdictio11s (City of Re11to11 for Sewer a11d Water District 90) require a 1"=40' horizontal and I"= 4' vertical. By keeping the scales the same for all co11structio11 drawings, coordi11atio11 for cha11ges and clarity can be achieved. In addition, by keeping the scale at l "=4 ', your scale does not need to be rotated when evaluating horizontal to vertical. ~ CB 2 is taller than 5' (grate to invert). Change CB 2 to a Type II CB. The storm drainage system has been modified to decrease the depth of this CB. /. Through curb inlets shall not be used on rolled curb. See "Guidelines for Using Flanking Catchbasins", dated December 2002 attached. I CB x will remain as a thru curb inlet due to the vertical curb. CB y across the street has ~ee11 v\ modified to a rolled vaned grate as requested. ; . c . 0/ ·' '1 ,. ,:. ' i;> c ? • , , , ' J ; , '~ t }(I" I '} f 1 ... I • I :1 S .. ,.,. / r, t ... ' (J Sh t 8· OW width shall include 1' of extra ROW behind curb or sidewalk. e ROW has been modified to accommodate the 1' of area behind the sidewalk/curb. A"P- w).P ~!J +v I z_s-Y' c,,--, l)<..-Y-f-/c...=J e,v.-{::,, 1 v ,.,.-- ~ r '5-7~,c._ ~·;..A.,_ l7 l\1_ove pond sign outside of fence for maximum visibility. · -::_.. The pond sign has been relocated. I M Add note that King County will grant the Home Owner's Association a Special Use Permit free l/ of charge if they would like to maintain the Rain Garden. A note has been added to the plans as requested. Sheet 10: fl\ Change pond sign to what is shown on KCSWDM Figure 5.3.1.D. L/ The pond detail sign has been changed to the detail available 011 the King County web page. Page 4 Claire Jonson King County DOES June 29, 2007 Technical Information Report: Sectioll/2: \.Y' Add Preliminary Conditions Summary with responses. The Conditions of approval and responses have been added to Section 2. ~ I)'. Add Bond Quantities Worksheet. A Bond Quantity Worksheet has been included in Section 9. i/ Add a single, generic Declaration of Covenant and Grant of Easement (see KCSWDM Reference 8-J) for the individual lot BMPs. The Declaration of Covenant and Grant of Easement form has been provided in this section. -; , Q -~ ~ 4-; Or.-fl'e:o tfuJ~ ~ S;ncerely, ~r-(7-f,1 !ATES a S. Cushman, PE Project Engineer RSC cc: Cam West/Sara Slatten enclosures ~----------------------------------------------------- .. L05POO 19 Martin Plat Page I of 2 Sara Slatten From: Carlson, Joanne [Joanne.Carlson@METROKC.GOV] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 12:17 PM To: Sara Slatten Subject: RE: L05P0019 Martin Plat Hi Sara I setup the Engineering Activity for you the number is L07SR015 the deposit fee for Pete Dye's project manager review is $784.88 when he has completed the budget letter he will mail it to the applicant. Please provide Engineering Review with a signed Certification of applicant status form. Thank You Joanne From: Sara Slatten [mailto:sslatten@camwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 8:41 AM To: Carlson, Joanne Subject: RE: LOSP0019 Martin Plat Thanks Joanne, I am planning to be at KC this Thursday for the hearing and can bring the additional copies, check and request letter to Jim Sanders. Possible to get the required fee amount/ project code from you and I can swing by the cashiers office w/ payment and drop off the plans to the front desk to Pete's attention. Sara ·····Original Message····· From: Carlson, Joanne [mailto:Joanne.Carlson@METROKC.GOV] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 3:51 PM To: Sara Slatten Subject: LOSP0019 Martin Plat Hi Sara Pete ask me to let you know he needs the following item to do his project management review, we did receive the one road & storm plan set and TIR. Pete will need 2 additional sets. The day you are ready to submit the rest of the items call or e-mail me and I will set up the activity number. You can have your submittal dropped at the front reception desk & you can just go to the cashier and post the fee to the number I can give you. If you want to meet with the permit tech's you can schedule a appointment with them at 206-296-6797. Pete mentioned that the hearing for the Martin Plat is the 22nd, however he still needs a letter addressed to Jim Sanders, requesting concurrent review, since it hearing is not complete and the hearing examiner has not published their report. Please feel free to contact Pete Dye 206-296-7158 Jim Sanders 206-296-7178 or myself at 206-296-7216 or by e-mail joanne.carlson@metrokc.gov Thank You Joanne M. Carlson 3/26/2007 L05P0019 Martin Plat Page 2 of2 AS 11 Engineering Review Section Follow these steps for submitting engineering plans for a subdivision: 1. Provide 3 sets of complete engineering plans and 3 Technical Information Reports (TIR). 2. Provide a completed Certification of Applicant Status form. Ui~\\ ffi ~ \(' 3. Provide a fee deposit of $784.88. 4. Call Joanne Carlson for a submittal appointment at 206-296-7216. '' 3/26/2007 ' . ) August 13, 2007 Claire Jonson King County ODES 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 RE: Martin Property KC # L07SR015 Triad Job No. 04-257 Dear Claire: 12112 115thAvenueNE Kirkland, WA 98034-6929 425.821.8448 425.821.3481 fax 800.488.0756 toll free www.triadassoc.com Enclosed, as requested, is one set of Road and Storm Plans and one TlR. Please note the responses to your second review comments are provided in bold. Don't hesitate to call me at (425) 821-8448 if you have any questions. General Comments: v(" Submit mailbox location approval by the U.S. Postal Service. RESPONSE: Two copies of the approval from the U.S. Postal Service for mailbox location have been included in the re-submittal package. Mailbox location is shown on Sheet 6. /. Add sidewalk ramps at east and west side of 145th Place SE at intersection with 125th. Sidewalk ramps without 4' landing can be approved by Development Engineer without a variance per memo dated 7 / 13/07 attached. RESPONSE: The sidewalk ramps have been added to the east and west side of 145th Ave at the intersection with SE 125 1h Street as requested. Please see sheet 6 for the locations and Sheet 8 for the details. / Note that Bruce Engell has approved tree retention/replacement plan sheets L5 and L6. A bond quantity worksheet must be submitted electronically and approved prior to LUIS accepting the plat for construction. RESPONSE: The electronic version of the bond quantity work sheets has been forwarded via email. A copy of the email is attached for reference . .../. Provide Soil amendments plan per KC Code 16.82.100 f, g . RESPONSE: Notes have been added to the grading plan reflecting the requirements for soil amendments per KC Code. 5. How is H.E. Condition 7h (bypass and groundwater interception) being addressed? Page 2 Claire Jonson King County DOES August 13, 2007 /. RESPONSE: The existing French drain located near the east property line will be removed during infrastructure construction. Drainage from the yards of the three parcels to the east will continue to sheet flow to the west. This area has been accounted for in the storm water detention and water quality treatment calculations. Please refer to the Geotechnical Report for details on groundwater. Per Pete Dyes' letter dated April 6, 2007," the recreation plan must be submitted to our planning section as a separate permit application with fee payment. For further information regarding the submittal process for recreation plans, please contact Kim Claussen at 206-296-7167." RESPONSE: Landscape plans were submitted in July to Kim Claussen. Please see Activity #L07MI065. Engineering Plans: ~ ..)'. Add Hearing Examiner's conditions of final plat approval #Sf, and 9 to 11. RESPONSE: The above referenced Conditions of approval have been added. Please note that Conditions Sf and 11 were labeled 'deleted' in the Hearing Examiners report. ~ ;f. Revise note for CB 16 to see detail, sheet 4. RESPONSE: CB 16 detail is located on Sheet 10 and the note has been updated. ~Rockery is shown in the pond tract. Rockeries are not allowed in KC owned storm pond tracts per DNR policy. Consider moving lot line boundary so that rockery and clean out for rockery is outside of storm pond tract. RESPONSE: Lot #11 has been revised to include the entire rockery, thus removing the rockery outside of the storm pond tract. / The ROW boundary of SE 125th St is not clearly shown for the offsite improvements in that ROW. The sidewalk appears to encroach into the adjacent lot. Please clarify and correct as needed. RESPONSE: The existing ROW line in Shamrock Heights has been darkened and labeled to be clearly identified. The sidewalk located in this area is within the ROW and does not encroach into the lot. An additional cross section has been added to Sheet 8 to clarify the condition. Sheet 7: / Fifty foot sag vertical curve on SE 125 1h St does not meet minimum stopping sight distance. This can be mitigated with an installation of street illumination through a Page 3 Claire Jonson King County DDES August 13, 2007 I variance. See memo dated April 27, 1994 attached. Variance application has been received and can be approved administratively. RESPONSE: Comment noted. The variance was applied for on 7/16/07 with King County Activity Number L07V0066. Sheet 8: 7125"' St vertical curb, gutter, and sidewalk side -ROW width shall include l' of extra ROW behind sidewalk. RESPONSE: The ROW within the project boundary indudes the extra 1-foot of space behind the sidewalk. Please note that beyond the boundary, the ROW has an existing width that precludes the addition of the requested I-foot of extra ROW. Please see response provided above for Sheet 6 Sheet 9:, /. Correct "Home Owner's Association (H.0.A.)" in note that King County will grant a Special Use Permit free of charge if they would like to maintain the Rain Garden. RESPONSE: The typographical error has been corrected. Sheet 10: (1· Make pond sign text more clear so that it is readable. RESPONSE: The sign detail has been scaled to a larger size to provide clarity. I CB 16 Flow Restrictor detail -Add note" l' section of pipe attached by gasketed band to allow removal" per KCSWDM page 5-40. RESPONSE: The note has been added as requested. ~ \)1. Add the following: GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS PROVIDE FOR SPECIAL INSPECTIONS BY AN EXPERIENCED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST FOR COMPLIANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS BY ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. DATED JANUARY 27, 2005 AND JUNE 22, 2007. WRITTEN RECORDS OF ALL INSPECTIONS AND APPROVALS SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE KING COUNTY SITE INSPECTOR. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHALL HAVE SPECIAL INSPECTION: Page 4 Claire Jonson King County DOES August 13, 2007 MONITOR AND APPROVE THE PLACEMENT OF ALL STRUCTURAL FILL INCLUDING THE POND BERMS, AND STRUCTURAL FILL ADJACENT TO THE ROCKERIES. VERIFY THE SUITABILITY OF BEARING SOILS AFTER EXCAVATION AND PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF STRUCTURAL FILL, RETAINING WALLS IF ANY, ROCKERIES, ROADS AND FOOTINGS. VERIFY PROPER FILL PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION WITH FIELD AND LABORATORY DENSITY TESTING. RESPONSE: The above note has been added to Sheet 12 as requested. ~ ,II-Verify that the trees are planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads per KCC2 l A.16.050. RESPONSE: A general note has been added to the sheet to provide street trees at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage. The tree spacing will have to be adjusted in the field once the driveway locations are determined. Sincerely, !ATES ca . Cushman, PE ProJect Engineer RSC -j~J~ cc: Jennifer Reiner, Cam West Development enclosures r Rebecca Cushman From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Rebecca Cushman Thursday, August 09, 2007 1 :46 PM 'Engell, Bruce'; 'Jonson, Claire' Gerry Buck; 'Sara Slatten'; 'Jennifer Reiner' FW: Martin Property: Landscape Bond Qty. Sheets Attachments: 04-257 KC Lndscpe Bnd Onty Wrksht.xls; SigTreeExPlantBond7-16-07.doc Bruce, Page I of I Enclosed are the electronic versions of the landscape bond quantity work sheets for the Martin Property -KC #L05P0019 as requested by Claire Jonson. Thank you again for all of your assistance. Rebecca S. Cushman, PE I Project Engineer Triad Associates 12112 115th Ave NE Kirkland, WA 98034 P: 425.821.8448 F: 425.821.3481 E: rcushman@triadassoc.com W: www.triadassoc.com 8/13/2007 _..,, September 4, 2007 Claire Jonson King County DOES 900 Oaksdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 RE: Martin Property RECEIVED SEP o a 2007 KING COUNTI LAND USE SERVICES Triad Job No. 04-257 (KC #L07SR015) Dear Claire: 12112 llSthAvenueNE Kirkland, WA 98034-6929 425.821.8448 425 821.3481 tax 800.488.0756 toll free www.tric1dassoc.com Enclosed is the re-submittal package for the Martin Property road and storm engineering plans consisting of 1 set of Mylar original. In addition to the plan set, I copy of the revised TIR is also included. Each comment provided by you has been responded to in bold italic font for your ease of review. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 425 821-8448. General: I. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: "Single family residences and other improvements constructed on the lots created by this subdivision must implement the flow control best management practices stipulated in the drainage plan declaration of covenants and grant of easement recorded for each lot. Compliance with this stipulation must be addressed in the small project drainage plan submitted for drainage review when application is made for a single family residential building permit for the lot. Condition noted. This will be added to the final recorded plat. ~gineering Plans: y1. Sheet I, provide note that the mailbox and location has been approved by the US Postal Service Highlands STA 98056 Renton, WA on July 9, 2007 and to see file. An approval note has been added to the cover sheet. j Label and dimension a drainage easement for the storm pipe crossing Tract A An easement for the storm pipe on Tract A has been provided and dimensioned as requested. Gr -,tt,, (Y1 ""-"'~ O>" '\v""6\-/'r /. Show Tract B dedicated to King County A note has been added to the plans stating the dedication of Tract B to King County. I ~ -5n u+ <t N ct<:--11• t'\-hu--J --:r ;d c.,, · Provide a reference note and summary of the road variance -L07V0066. Please find attached the approved copy. A reference note has been added to the plan view and the actual variance text has been added to Sheet 2. I Sheet 6, Tract B -revise the reference note to sheet 9 pond details rather than I 0. The note has been revised to reference Sheet 9. , Land Development Consultants ~------------------- .--.... Page 2 Claire Jonson King County DDES September 4, 2007 ~how the following notes on Sheet 6: "The final plat shall include the recording of applicable documents for implementation of stonn water BMP's as described in Appendix C of the King County drainage manual. A declaration of covenant and grant of easement with the required text of instructions shall be recorded to address the proposed lot dispersion and rain garden. " This note has been added to Sheet 6. t,7. Change the street tree species to match the KC list attached. The street tree call out has been revised to one off of the KC list tion 2: Change response for Condition 7h to what is shown in response letter dated August 13, 2007: "The existing French drain located near the east property line will be removed during infrastructure construction. Drainage from the yards of the three parcels to the east will continue to sheet flow to the west. This area has been accounted for in the stonn water detention and water quality treatment calculations. Please refer to the Geotechnical Report for details on groundwater." This response in the TIR has been revised as requested. S,ection 4: r-J. Per 2005 KCSWDM page 1-34, for conservation flow control assume historic site conditions as the predeveloped conditions. The definition of Historic Site Condition per Definitions page l O -means those which existed on the site prior to any development in the Puget Sound region. For lands not currently submerged shall be assumed to be forest cover unless reasonable historic, site-specific infonnation is provided to demonstrate a different vegetation cover. Existing conditions must meet historic. See Steve Foley's email attached. Onsite areas have been revised to Historic Conditions (forest) as requested. Off site/upstream are non-targeted pervious and impervious areas and has been documented and modeled as existing areas. If these parcels develop in the future, they will be required to provide flow control and water quality treatment. Sincerely, RSC cc: Cam West/Jennifer Reiner enclosures \ Jonson, Claire From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Rebecca Cushman [rcushman@TriadAssoc.com] Thursday, August 09, 2007 1 :46 PM Engell, Bruce; Jonson, Claire Gerry Buck; Sara Slatten; Jennifer Reiner FW: Martin Property: Landscape Bond Qty. Sheets Attachments: 04-257 KC Lndscpe Bnd Qnty Wrksht.xls; SigTreeExPlantBond7-16-07.doc Bruce, Page I of I Enclosed are the electronic versions of the landscape bond quantity work sheets for the Martin Property -KC #L05P0019 as requested by Claire Jonson. Thank you again for all of your assistance. Rebecca S. Cushman, PE I Project Engineer Triad Associates 12112 115th Ave NE Kirkland, WA 98034 P: 425.821.8448 F: 425.821.3481 E: rcushrnan@triadassoc.com W: www.trladassoc.com 08/09/2007 ·' LANDSCAPE BOND QUANTITY FORM King Cou1i.ty Department ofDevelopmcnl and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 PROJECT NAME: Martin Property: Landsc. Bond DOES PROJECT #: L04P0024 ADDRESS: SE 125th Street; King C. PREPARED BY: Margie Korve, Triad Assoc. DATE PREPARED: July 17, 2007 DRAWING DATE: June 29, 2007 Bonds are based upon required landscaping only and will be posted for performance and/or maintenance. Required landscaping includes perimeter landscaping, surtace parking area landscaping, (KCC 21A.16) and any landscaping required by SEPA environmental review. The maintenance period is for the life of the project, however, after posting for maintenance, the performance bond will be reduced by 30% ($1,000.00 minimum) and be held for a two year period. Upon re-inspection of the site the bond will be released if the site has been properly maintained (21 A.16.180). If the project has not been maintained and there are dead trees, shrubs, ground cover, or other deficiencies noted in the required landscaping the bond will be held until the deficiencies are corrected ,.,.. ' ....• , .• \:l':;1::1:i 11'i!iii!l!i::Ii:: ,, .,.,.•,:,\\j' ,•,· ,., -.· .. ,,· ']:,::II'·" ::; '" r, E\ "'("'•'''• .. ,, :,"'{'\)/ :;, 'IN :<ti ;I; ·!_J <:}·· SOD LAWN AREAS $500.00 MSF (1000 SQ. FT) 0.00 HYDROSEEDING: LAWN $50.00 MSF (1000 SQ. FT) 3.30 HYDROSEEDING: INFILTRATION PONDS $50.00 MSF (1000 SQ. FT) 7.07 AQUATIC PLANTS $500.00 MSF (1000 SQ. FT) 1.00 RAIN GARDEN PLANTING $500.00 MSF (1000 SQ. FT) 3.60 DETENTION POND SHRUBIGROUNDCOVER PLNTC $1.00 SQ.FT 8,330.00 SOIL PREPARATION A. TOPSOIL: SHRUB & TREES (6 INCHES DEEP) $25.00 CY (CUBIC YARD) 215.00 TOPSOIL: LAWN AREA (4 INCHES DEEP) $25.00 CY (CUBIC YARD) 41.31 B. MULCH (2 IN.): included w/ tree & shrub plant'g $24.00 CY (CUBIC YARD) 70.00 C. PEAT MOSS (TWO INCHES DEEP) $2.30 SY (SQUARE YARD) 0.00 D. COMPOST (3 INCHES DEEP & TILLING) $26.00 SY (SQUARE YARD) 0.00 E. FERTILIZER: included w/tree and shrub plant'g $6.67 CY (CUBIC YARD) 0.00 PLANT MATERIALS A. DECIDUOUS TREES (INTERIOR LANDSCAPING OR OTHER REC'D LANDSCAPING) 2.0ft CALIPER (minimum height 10') $250.00 COST&LABOR 0.00 1 . 75" CALIPER (minimum height 1 O') $200.00 COST&LABOR 3.00 MULTI TRUNK (minimum height 6') $80.00 COST&LABOR 2.00 8. EVERGREEN TREES FIVE (5) FEET OR ABOVE $150.00 COST&LABOR 0.00 C. SHRUBS (5 Gallon) $45.00 COST&LABOR 0.00 C. SHRUBS (2 Gallon) $30.00 COST&LABOR 245.00 SHRUBS (1 gallon) $10.00 COST&LABOR 27.00 <·······•{g//!:I::: $165.00 $353.50 $500.00 $1,800.00 $8,330.00 $5,375.00 $1,032.75 $1,680.00 $0.00 $600.00 $160.00 $0.00 $7,350.00 $270.00 SUB TOTAL BOND AMOUNT BOND AMOUNT SUB TOTAL: =>AGE 1 OF 3 $27,616.25 I D. GROUND COVER (1 Gallon) $8.00 COST & LABOR 0.00 GROUND COVER (4 inch Pots) $4.00 COST& LABOR 0.00 MISCELLANEOUS TREE STAKES $2.65 PER STAKE & LABOR 0.00 FENCING LINEAR FOOT 3.5 FT. WOOD SPLIT RAIL $8.00 INCLUDES LABOR 176.00 $1,408.00 IRRIGATION IRRIGATION: Tract A $0.50 SQUARE FOOT 7,696.00 $3,848.00 IRRIGATION: Tract B $0.25 SQUARE FOOT 12,614.00 $3,153.50 ADDITIONAL ITEMS SURFACES CONCRETE PAVING/ WALK $15.00 SY (SQUARE YARD) 84.40 $1,266.00 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT: All Unit Prices include delivery and installatio PLAY STRUCTURE $9,183.00 LS (LUMP SUM) 1.00 $9,183.00 PLAY SURFACING ( 12 INCH DEPTH) $2,106.00 LS (LUMP SUM) 1.00 $2,106.00 PLAY SURFACE PERIMETER EDGING $14.00 LF (INCLUDES LABOR) 114.00 $1,596.00 SUB TOTAL BOND AMOUNT BOND AMOUNT SUB TOTAL: $22,560.50 PAGE 2 OF 3 I SITE FURNISHINGS: All Unit Prices include delivery and installation WOOD BENCHES $540.00 EACH 1.00 $540.00 PICNIC TABLE $1,075.00 EACH 1.00 $1,075.00 THIRTY.PERCENT CONTINGENCY FEE $15,537.53 TOTAL BOND AMOUNT TOTAL BOND PRICE: Note: 1. Street trees and coniferous trees are not calculated in this bond quantity worksheet, but are included as part of Significant Tree Bond Quantity Worksheet. PAGE J OF J $67,329.28 SIGNIFICANT TREE RETENTION PLAN BOND INFORMATION (Planting & Existing Trees) This Significant Tree Retention performance and maintenance bond (for replanting and existing significant trees) is to ensure that significant tree replacements are planted and survive. It is also to ensure that the significant trees to be retained are saved in a healthy state and replaced as approved by the approved significant tree retention plan or DOES approved ( documented) revisions to that plan. The planting portion of the bond is for a period of three (3) years monitoring from the date of tree planting installation acceptance in writing by DOES or until the approved Significant Tree Retention Plan has been successfully complied with. The existing bond amount can be released upon successful retention of the significant trees to be retained after the construction has been completed. At the final inspection for Significant Tree Retention by the ODES Land Use Inspection Unit (LUIS), the general site bond may be released if the site is in compliance with the ODES approved Engineering Site and Construction Plan and the Significant Tree Retention Plan. This Significant Tree Retention (Planting) portion of the performance and maintenance bond remains in affect for three (3) years monitoring or until DOES LUIS has completed final construction inspection and supports bond release as the Significant Tree Retention Plan is in compliance. If the Tree Retention Plan is not in compliance at the end of the street tree monitoring period LUIS can forward monitoring responsibility to DOES Site Development Services. DOES Site Development Services will assign an inspection/monitoring tracking number and bill the permittee the hourly rate in effect at that time as established by the King County Council Fee Ordinance. The permittee/developer is responsible to post the Significant Tree Retention and Planting Bond with ODES (Financial Guarantee Section) prior to the LUIS pre-construction meeting and prior to starting any site work/disturbance. A private agreement may be necessary between the plat permittee/developer, the future builder and the future landowner to ensure continued access for DOES inspections to the lots for the three (3) years monitoring or until the approved Significant Tree Plan has been complied with. This may require legal documentation as requested by DOES and is the sole responsibility of the plat permittee/developer to secure this agreement. A copy of this agreement shall be submitted to ODES Site Development Services and the LUIS Inspector. The future builder/landowner on the referenced lots that include significant trees ( existing or planted) shall not remove or damage these trees in any way without prior approval (a permit may be required) from DOES -Site Development Services. It shall be the responsibility of the bond holder to request bond release from DOES. !fat the end of the three (3) year monitoring period (or as extended) the Significant Tree Retention Plan has not been complied with the bond may be forfeit to King County. It is the responsibility of the bond holder to perform monitoring and maintenance of the plantings as stated on the DOES Significant Tree Retention Plan or as legally assigned to . others as stated above. Status reports on planting success shall be submitted to ODES Site Development Services a minimum of once per year. Submittal of this bond by the permittee/designee and acceptance by DOES constitutes acceptance of the above stated conditions. SIGNIFICANT TREE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET (Planting & Existing Trees) (Complete and return electronically) Date: July 16, 2007 Project Name: Martin Property DDES Project Number: LOSP0019 I. Soil Preparation Topsoil Mulch (2 inch depth X 36" round) Fertilizer Removal of invasive species lrrigation (hand water per owner) 2. Plant Materials Deciduous Trees (Nursery Stock) Caliper: 3" cal Evergreen Trees (Nursery Stock) Cali er: 3" cal / 8' ht Other: 3. Labor & Equipment Costs Labor: (planting) Equipment: 4. Tree Protection Measures High Visibility Fencing (includes labor) Tree Stakes s. Monitoring Costs 3 years monitoring with reports Existing Significant Tree Values Retained Existing Significant Trees: Other: SUBTOTAL 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION TOTAL PERFORMANCE BOND AMOUNT First $2500.00 shall be cash $10.00 31 $6.00 31 $15.00 31 NIA NIA $175.00 18 $125.00 13 $165.00 31 $45.00 31 $50.00 34 $2.65 62 $500.00 3 ears $250.00 3 $310.00 $186.00 $465.00 NIA NIA $3,150.00 $1,625.00 $5,115.00 $1,395.00 $1,700.00 $164.30 $1,500.00 $750.00 $16,360.30 $4,908.00 $21,268.30 Quantity Calculations completed by: Margie Korve & Mei-Shiou Lin@ Triad Associates Approved by Site Development Specialist: Included in landsc. Bond (18) Dec. Trees to be installed as Street Trees includes (3) retained trees (2) stakes per re lacement tree (3) Alder Trees ... V, (Jij A¥ 11YA/10) 3S AV Hl8£1 lS ·o:> 9NDI '~3SAV t;; AV Mflltttt;.,l,-,a""",._11 r. ~ ' ( ( (' C ( ( • • • • • • • ----• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .. • • • • • • \ • • • • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • T';;;. Apollo ) I• •sch / ) ..~ • • • • • • • • . ·I • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • = • • It •. II II • • JI• ,• II • II ' ---J • • • ~ . ~. • • • AgC -~ • • • • • • •. A• •Y/ •• AgC • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • •••• ===~=. • • •••••• •• •••••••• ••••••• • • • •• • • • • ••• •• ·-• • • • • ~ • • AgB ·aN . • • •• • • • • • • • ~--• • I • i- i I I •• I • • : • • •••• I • .. : ··: r:-: • • • I I I • ~15 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ___ I ----·-=----1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • / I I I I I I I I I I • • • • • • • • • • • • • AgC 7 1 680 000 FEET • ti • • • II II • ~ • • • • • II • II II // // I/ • AgC • • • E • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 14 /===;~ • •11 II II • II --·11 I 11 • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I • • • • • -• • • ·-•• • • • • • -• • • ••••• • • •• • •• • ••• • • • 1 • •• • • • • • I • • • -~ \...:;/ ID ... i 0 ,,. ,- N l'- -,.'3l>te- @) ~ ~ (, 661.42 0 l ltl:57J. 'J F ,31.21 12,uo 12,:us 1237.27 12,2.84 50 ,, C. f<.{'P I I ,1 100 I ~ D ( 3) ,. ~3""' t.'t8 lt.c. ,, ,()¢ Al.. ~ ~ ~ u,~ 776004 vl!.J t:.;. ~ @ _jjO_ --r--~:----,----:-~~66::.:,:ao.,,...,~...__~~~---+--:---~-=-----='.:::;?iO;:.:·'~'---~-----I ,-111t 153.'25 330A' 330.4, 300.5 S.P 877012 (2) so PAr-Tu I . I ·~~ [1 . I ;. I A05PM260 ZONING S-T-R ,, 'Q5UN6S I.*. SEQJl'ES '1'fTWPUNES N ~ WallllrBalel -Raid RIQM9,d-Way C]Paroels Cl Pao1<s Oles ~10-~oneDUper10acres -A-35-~. one OU per 35 aa. -F-Foreet -M·Mlnhl RA-2.5 -Rini -· one OU per 5 acres RA-5· Rani Area , one DU per Saa. RA-10 -Rini l'nla, one OU per 10 acres ~ -Utian-. one OU per 5 acres R-1--· one OU per acre R-4 • Rlllldentlal, 4 OU per acre R~-RINldentlal , 8 OU per acre R~--· 8 OU per acre R•12-Relldlnllal , 12 DU per acre -R-18-Reeldenllal , 18 DU per acre -R-24 • Reeklanlial, 24 DU per acre -R-48 -Ralidonllal , 48 DU per acre NB • Neigl',bomood lluliness -CB. Cormu1ily a...,,.. -RB • ReQIOl1al Bt.Blr,- -O -Offlee I • klltarlll N Otv BoundllfleS 0 600 1000 1600 Feel 1"a 1333- ®l<Jng County ---..... ----bl' Klr'GOouriy--•vaWyal ................ .. I II I I I I ''=~~m:-.... .. «:O.ffl:Y.--or,'Gfato .. _al =-.--=:-~~=-.:=:..., --~ ...... -....... --...... pral*~flom .. .-cr_allho-.., :-::-..:" .. ·:.:r.r:=-::..~ Oouriy Plol dlle: .AA 30, 2006; \lddee001\x01'Gl9\av_~\bllse2.apr II J ii ;i; !JI' i '! -lii'i!llli! 0 I -' ]t j -Ii H ! ibh)Jt co f,x •11ib;~ C\I i ~ t l I I ~ lit,p! ,,ii I 'I' 1111 J ' (i) Ut (d 1 ltl j 0.. 0 I ~<( ,.s 11umh r · I~{ ldih <( (.) <!ii%~ < 1{11 01 ~rt fdtdu I i;f ~ I i 0 co N c~ ·-CL tLO COO ~<( A05PM260 2005 SWDM WawBodlee landlllCle -Ol3irage ,.,_ D Landlllde Hazad Ol3irage CJ lMdlllide Hazad Mia D Parcall F1oN Control (2004) BMlc -eo-...on -Flood PlotJlarnl N Oly Ba.nd8rfee Olhls 0 ~ Feel 1-.500191!1 ® King Cowlty I :1 111r~~J , , 1 1 1 • , ~"V>,!?.!!0;-~z=::«-r:.i:.:;:.:.~=~ ~-nalioo. KreCO..C-,_,,, Np.Willlllt..•or......,.,...acpw0tffCllld..all>tht -,ocy, _,.,...._, _ orrial*IDh-fll ::...--:-~~:.:::.:.11'¥ --=: ....... -...... -..... ..--.. ...... _ .. _., .. _ L. 1_.,f~J:~u~i4::-'...;'.':,;::.."::~=..,~ Qu.iy. Roi dale: .U 30, 2005( \lddll001"'°1'Gla\aY_~apr A05PM260 LIDAR Topot23r05 5 N 10 Bald Eagle Nella tt=Nelvm ~T·R ,, 'QSUNSS ~SEO.JNES '/(/TWPU'6 N S1t8* ik %'v,u3 ' ,, CZ, SAO WIiiand (18118) 1ZJ SAO Lancllllde BB SAO Qlal Mine CS SAO Sellllic E3 SAO EroelOn WalarBOdlel CJWLRD~~ c:J Pan:ela Paroels ,_. Eagle Habitat WDFW1 WllFW2 OR TREES1 WDFW2 OR lREES3 TREES2 Naty~ N FeMA o--Sedkn m FeMA Aooct,yay CJ FEMA 100-yr. Aocq,lain Olea 0 .600 1000 1 .. 1333"'81 ® King Cow,ty 1500 Feel ---........ ,__.,.,...by )fl>= I~ ~~.J:: ·~-::::"· ou>jod ID .... C ........,......orWMa1Mr._...«.,,.,..._ a lDtht _,.,.,,_..,...,__.,,... ...... ., =---.:=:.-~~=-.:.=:..,, --fr'cldr4i,bul ... l-lO,lool--«lool ..-~ ........ .,--., ... - ~,,..:".';.:t.l:.=-.::...~":""· Oouny. A05PM260 HYDRO/GEO BaldEagle- • ~Netwotk ~Ba9inl ~lelf='=;\-TJ-+-J -.--~--1 %E N ~ Els;- L_LJ' ("' , , ~r I • CX8 SAO WIiiand (19118) e'J SAO L8ndllld8 11D SAO CCIII Mine S:, SAO s.nlc ~ SAO EIOllial waterlloclel CJ WLRO Orange~ C]Parcell Partels ,,..1:ag1,e Hallilal WDFW1 WOFW2 OR TREES1 WOFW2 OR TREES3 TREES2 N aty 8Qundar1M N FBMO..SS-.... mJ FBM Flooo,,8y CJ FBM1~1"-~ Ollllt 0 &oil 1000 1500 Fell iiiiil!!!!!!!!! 1"• 1333 feel ®King County t;:::1 1[ j i , , ~~=::.n~===-~=i: -'IITTPITT/1 II ~--Klng°'""I'-... 411 I l~r---. ==:::-.:..-==:~ .. -..:: I ---l<q °"""-... bo _ .... .., rill / i§t/]i',J I llFl ~~~r::?".£~ ~ I :::*..;',.':".::..':~:..~:-· eo...r, Plot -Ju 30, 2005; \ldclll001\x01'gll\av_~ 0 ot-(00 NI ::? a.. a.. ~ LOO Oo <(N \...__..- --..r--__ + ------......... .. ~~~ -. .. ~ ~ -~ --.;:--- A05PM260 ARTERIALS S-T·R . ' ,' \ ,' QSUNES 'A'/ /. V. SEOJIES 'IV lWPlJNE$ /\/ Sir.a w .. Bodies D Pan:ela /\ICIiy~ a. 0 1000 :ZOOO 3000 "4000 Feel 1 .. 3333feal ®King County Tho--.... ---~i.r t<q Oounly--. ~cl--loMljocj .. da-qa-llOljoo. Klrv Oounly-no Npi .. Mllol,o, ................. Olfl'Cllld,•toa. -.-......-.-or~IOIN-d --IQ'GOounly-notbo-lor"'f _.. ....... --.«..._- ._lrdolr'9, tu not llmlad to. lool-orlool prollla-'*'9tanh,-or-c111w-..-. ::-'..:.·:: . ..1:::..~ Oounly. Plot dtle: .U 30, 2005; \\ddll001lx01'Gil\8V_~ I ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division • 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (206) 296-6600 TIY (206) 296-7217 Alternative formats available upon request Drop-Off Cover Sheet for Land Use Services Division PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME IS NECESSARY FOR ALL DROP-OFFS Project No.: LOJ oR 015 Project Name: ffJ/t/L,TJN $Q/JY!-7Y K.C. 0.0.E.S. FROM: S!lr!A s t.Lr1f,~ /1/tm l,t(_,£"5T Company Name / q9ntact erson ~ Telephone No.: 4-JS:-'&)S':-" !'1~-.> TO: f £1£ DYE .! t:i !V6J/l/f.UtrJq ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY KING COUNTY STAFF (please print) Short Plat / Plats Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Lot Line Adjustment Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Right of Way Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Clearing/ Grading Permit Additional information requested; please specify item(s) dropped-off: s e/,.ns , t PLEASE NOTE: All drop-off item(s) will be logged into the computer under the project number, therefore, it is important that the top portion of this form is completed properly before you drop-off anything. Assistance in finding a project number can be provided by speaking to a Land Use Services Division Person of the Day (POD) or the Zoning/Land Use Technician. Your cooperation is important. Thank you. LUSD Drop-Dff Cover Sheet lg-cvs-dropoff. pdf 05-30-2002 Page 1 of 1 ® King County Department of Deve.lopment and Environ mental Services Land Use Services Division • 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Drop-Off Cover Sheet for Land Use Services Division **************************** IMPORT ANT *************************** Date Received by LUSD Project No.: ~ ~ ~R ~} :7~ la) FROM: K.C, O.D.E.S. Company Name/ Co' P on TelephoneNo: ~~ -I~~ TO ¥!3?1V DYE-- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY KING COUNTY STAFF (please print) Short Plat/ Plats Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Lot Line Adjustment Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Right of Way Permit Please specify ilem(s) dropped-off: Clearing I Grading Permit -Acldilional information requested Please specify ilem(s) dropped-off --U~!A45~T-~L-:'f: Ez1.J~_NG,_ ~-:J)G\)-1-8«,J--~---f2.fLOJ-~1=------ 0111er: -~-~srr5 __ QF-_~_s:~ -JI~ 12a~LA, --= PLEASE NOTE: A.II drop-off itcrn(s) will be logged into the cornputer under the project number, therefore, ii is irnportanl that the top portion o( this form is cornpleted prope,·ly before you clrop-of1 anything. Assistance in finding a project number can be provided by speaking to a Zoning/Land Use Technician. Your coopor:ation is important. Thank }'OU. Check out the DOES Web site at 1_11ww.metrokc.govlddes Drop-Off Cover Shect-LUSD Only !9-cvs-dropoff 1>di 11-03-2004 Pa~w ·1 of 1 ffi'Iil·· !ill. . " . . . •:, ' ~ m~~~ @tw1M#§(t@irii) • March 7, 2007 . ' , Pete Dye, Engineering King County Department of Development & Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 RE: Martin Property: L05P0019 1. Early Engineering Review Request Dear Pete, • The following is a request to allow Cam West to submit the engineering plans for the Martin Property Plat prior to preliminary plat approval. The Martin property is a 13 lot plat, located directly south of our Shamrock Heights plat. Martin is scheduled to · go to Hearing later this month ·on March.22. · · • The Martin property is a smaller, relatively straight forward plat. Our hope is to submit the engineering plans early in attempts to gain approval later this summer. Our goal is to start construction towards the end of the summer around l~te July. Jim Sanders indicated that we should submit this request along with two sets of plan_s to you for consideration. Should you have any questions, please call me at 425-825-1955. We look forward to hearing back from you._ Thanks. Sincerely, C'~,,. U/ f{.'V• Sara slatten Cam West Development, Inc. enclosures ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Web date: 09/09/2005 CERTIFICATION OF APPLICANT STATUS Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats. call 206-296-6600. Permit Number: L o]Sgo 15= Activity Number: Lo5Pl>O /CJ Penmlt Name: m fl't.,TJ/V /¥.Of&rTj FOR INDIVIDUALS: I, (print name), hereby certify that I am the/an owner of the property which is the subject of this permit. If I am not the sole owner of the property, I certify that I am authorized to represent all other owners of the property. My mailing address is: I further certify that I am the "Applicant" for this permit and as such am financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. I shall remain the "Applicant" for the duration of this permit unless I transfer my "applicant" status in writing on a form provided by DOES. * Signature of Applicant Date Signed -OR- FOR CORPORATIONS/BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS: I, SJrrJ.A. an authorized agent of , a corporation or other business association authorized to do business in the tale of Washington, which is the sole owner of the property that is the subject of this permit. If this corporation or business association is not the sole owner of the property, I certify that this corporation/business association is authorized to represent all other owners of the property. The mailing address of this corporation/business association is: °t1l0 /JE 120-rt. fl-#t{O /L/fL.lA?JD,i lVJ/: 9 fOJLf I further certify that the above named corporation/business association is the "Applicant" for this permit and as such is financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. This corporation/business association shall remain the "Applicant" for the duration of this permit unless it transfers its applicant status in writing on a form provided b DES. * Lf-/.Z-07 Date Signed * By signing as the Applicant or the Applicant's Agent, I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the information provided above is true and correct. CertApplicantStatusFORM.doc lc-cer-apstat.pdf 09/09/2005 Page 1 of 2 NOTICE TO APPLICANTS: By law, this department returns all engineering and other plans to the applicant. If, however, you wish to authorize the department to return engineering and other plans directly to the engineer, architect, or other consultant for the limited. purpose of making corrections, please designate below: D I authorize this department to return plans directly to my consultant(s) for the limited purpose of making corrections as designated on this form. CONSULTANTS: Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes CertAppticantStatusFORM.doc lc-cer-apstat.pdf 09/09/2005 Page 2 of 2 ® King County Department of Deve,opment and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Drop-Off Cover Sheet for Land Use Services Division **************************** I MP ORT ANT *************************** PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME IS NECESSARY Date Received by LUSD FOR ALL DROP-OFFS Project No. LDJ S~o IS""' Project Name m ~TJIJ ~0--0ef3f.;['/ FROM SRr:tf, RLff'[r~ [R1 ~ cc ~ ll \If ~ (R\ APR 2 8 2007 /bd) Company Name I ~oni_act erson {& Telephone No: ·· --' . 1. TO Pt+&< Dy£:, 0N6rl!Jf£4..) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY KING COUNTY STAFF (please print) Short Plat/ Plats Please specify item(s) droppecl-off: Lot Line Adjustment Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Right of Way Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off. Clearing I Grading Permit-Additional information requested Please specify ilern(s) droppecl-oll' k.C. D.D.E.S. PLEASE NOTE: All drop-oil ilom(s) will be logged into !he compuler under the project number, tl1erefore, it is irnporlant ll1at the top podion of this fmrn is completed proper·ly befme you drop-off anythin~J. Assistance in finding a project number can be prnvided by speaking to a Zo11111g/La11cf Uso Techr1ici811. Yotir coopera!im1 is irnporiant. Tharil·; you. Check out the DOES Web site at ':vww.metrokc.gov/ddes. Drop-Off Cover Sheet-LUSD Only l9-c 11s-dropoft pdf Pc19e 1 of 1 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Monday, April 23, 2007 CHARGES Description Counter Service Fees - Deposit Based on_ Est Hrs _______________ _ SUBTOTAL: PAYMENTS FEE RECEIPT Checklog Check # Payee _____________ D:...c.:.•t:..:e_E_n...:t.c••...:•:..:d ____ A~m:,.:oc:u.:cnt $205.28 $434.71 $144.89 $784.88 Description __________ Checklog Check# Payee Date Entered Amount Check ---------~'---6~3~02~9--C~A~M~W=E~ST=D~EV~E-L_O_P_M_E_N_T_I_N~C--~0~4/~23=/=20=0=7--7.($~2=2,=89~4~.2~0.) Check 62659 CAMWEST DEVELOPMENT INC 03/27/2007 ($784.88) SUBTOTAL: ($23,679.08) CHANGE GIVEN: $0.00 BALANCE DUE: ($22,894.20) The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DOES at the time of application. DDES permit fees were restructured effective March 4th, 1999. Many fees previously assessed a flat fee, now are assessed as hourly charges. Because of this change, and to ensure that our customers secure permits as quickly as possible, permits may be issued prior to all hourly charges being recorded into our billing system. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before ODES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. Printed on: Monday, April 23, 2007 at 2:35:50 PM Page I of I @ King County Land Use Services Division Permit Fee Estimate Pre-app Estimate Number: L07SR015 Date: 04/06/07 Permit Title: Martin Property Plat Permit Type: SITEREVP -Engineering Plan Estimated Maximum Hours: 147 Applicant: Sara Slatten Total Fee: $22,894.20 The following disclaimers are attached and are part of the fee estimate for this permit. The applicant · is required to submit a signed copy of this form with the application and fee payment acknowledging that the applicant has read the disclaimers stated below. Disclaimer Applicants are responsible for all fixed fees, reported hours performed in reviewing submittal materials and processing, up to the fee estimate. Changes in the scope of the project review will result in a revised review fee estimate. Fee estimates are based on information submitted to DOES by the applicant prior to finalization of the permit application. In addition, estimates are determined by utilizing historical data gathered from projects of similar type, size, and scope. The fee estimate will be the maximum fee charged unless the scope of the project changes. Should fewer hours be required to complete the review, then the applicant may receive a refund for those hours. If items are identified that are not originally disclosed or identified later in the process, a new estimate may be required. Applicants will be responsible for any additional hours identified in a new estimate because of: I) Changes in the project and unknown or undisclosed site issues. 2) Incomplete information or errors in applicant submittal. 3) County code fee changes. 4) Fees for structural review. 5) Fees for variance applications. 6) One major and one minor set ofredline comments. 7) Construction Bond amount that exceeds $500,000. 8) Tree retention plan not provided per KCC 16.82.156. 9) Street tree plan not provided. 10) Recreation plan not provided. 11) Soil amendment plan not provided per KCC 16.82.100. 12) Water Quality pond does not meet 3:1 flow standard. RECEIVED APR 2 8 2007 KING COUNlY LAND USE SERVICES 13) Wall heights exceed maximum height allowed in zoning code -KCC 2 lA.12.170. Keeping review fees at or below the fee estimate will depend on the applicant's commitment to complete the process review. This commitment should include submitting materials which address all County codes, policies, previously approved conditions, and responding to the County's request for corrections or additional information in a timely manner, not to exceed 90 days. Acknowledged: Applicant/Owner Name (print) Date: i./-12--0~plicant/Owner Name (signature) Project Manager.dot 1/26/04 Page2 C® King County Land Use Services Division Permit Fee Estimate Pre-app Estimate Number: L07SR015 I Date: 04/06/2007 Permit Title: Martin Property Subdivision Permit Type: SITEREVP -Engineering Plan I Based on permit information submitted by the applicant, the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) has determined the amount of review fees for the subject application. The fees shown below do not include ancillary permit fees, recording fees, project-related mitigation fees, or other fees that are passed through to the applicant from other agencies or as part of the project's environmental review. Fixed Fees: Counter Service Fee for Application Intake Tree Retention Review Structural Review (Determined at final approval) Other Fixed Fees Estimate for Hourly Fees: (147 Hours x $144.90) Amount previously paid as deposit Total Fixed Fees: Total Permit Fee Estimate: $205.28 $2,173.50 $ $2,378.78 $21,300.30 -$784.88 $22,894.20 Note: The estimate for hourly fees stated above is based on the total estimated number of hours not to exceed 147 hours for the disciplines listed below, and is calculated using the department's hourly rate in effect at the time the work is performed. Based upon the financial disclosures found on page 2, the number of hours required may be modified. The total estimated hours reflect work performed by the following disciplines: Engineering Review, Survey Coordination, Constructab(lity Review, Project Management, Traffic Review, Planning, and Geotechnical Review. After receiving the fee estimate from DOES, the applicant has ninety (90) days to complete the · application submittal. Please call 206-296-6797 to set up an appointment with the Permit Center to complete your application and payment. If the application is not received within ninety (90) days, the applicant may be required to obtain a new fee estimate or this activity may be cancelled. For further questions on this fee estimate or for other requirements about this permit application, please contact Pete Dye via email pete.dye@metrokc.gov or by telephone at 206-296-7185. Peter Dye,..E. Senior Engineer Land Use Services Division Project Manager.dot 1/26/04 Page I · tQ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 INFORMATION ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT STATEMENTS AND BILLINGS PROJECT MANAGEMENT STATEMENTS: If your application is being project managed, you will be provided a budget estimate that is based on historic averages and the information you provided with the application. Once you have received the estimate, it is your responsibility to contact the Project Manager and make arrangements for payment plans. Failure to do this may result in cancellation of your application. INSTALLMENT OPTION -OPTIONAL REQUEST: The permit type/sub type for this project qualifies for participation in the DDES installment plan. Under the plan, you can elect to make a down payment of at least 50% of the fee estimate. The remaining balance will be billed in equal monthly amounts beginning with the first project management statement you will receive. You may make all of your installment payments at once, but you must make the scheduled installments when due to avoid additional finance (late) charges. If you want to elect to pay a portion of the fee estimate and pay the remainder on a monthly installment plan, please contact your Project Manager before you submit your payment. If you do not do this, then 100% of . the deposit will be required prior to continuation of the project. PROJECT MANAGEMENT STATEMENTS THAT DO NOT HAVE AN INSTALLMENT PAYMENT OPTION: Under the project management system, if you do not elect to pay installments, then 100% of the deposit will be required at this time. You will receive a monthly statement and any total amount due, including any past due amounts, finance charges, current fees or budget adjustments will be refiected on the statement. PROJECT MANAGEMENT STATEMENTS WITH INSTALLMENT OPTION PLANS: · Under the project management system, you will receive a monthly statement for the total amount due that will include any past due amounts, current fees or budget adjustments, and any installments due by the first of the following month. FINANCE CHARGES: To avoid finance charges, payment will be required prior to the due date listed on the remittance advice of the statement. Finance charges are assessed on the outstanding delinquent balance. PROJECT MANAGEMENT INVOICES WHEN THE BUDGET IS NOT LOCKED BY THE PROJECT MANAGER. FINANCE SYSTEM PRODUCES AN INVOICE REFLECTING THE HOURLY CHARGES AND FEES INCURRED. You have 90 days to accept or reject the fee estimate. We will not lock your budget estimate for Project management until we receive your signed fee estimate letter and accompanying payment. In the interim, you may receive an invoice refiecting any hours charged or fees incurred on behalf of your project. The fees listed on this invoice are due regardless of whether you decide to move forward with your application process or your application is cancelled. If you do not pay these fees prior to the due date listed on the remittance advice of the invoice, finance charges may be assessed against any outstanding delinquent · balance. Project Manager.dot 5/6/04 Page 3 --, I tQ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov April 6, 2007 Sara Slatten · Carn West Development 9720 NE !20th Place Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 RE: Permit Fee Estimate Project: Martin Property File Number: L07SROl5 Dear Applicant: :rhank YO!! fo~ s~~mitting the ~ngi~e~ri~g plans for siie ·development or'th~ Martin Prnp~rty. , subdivision. To implement the engineering review process, our office will use a new procedure for managing the permit application to provide applicants with an enhanced level of customer service. A project manager will be assigned to your project to provide a fee estimate for the anticipated scope ofreview and will also monitor and manage the permit application throughout the review process. Your application for engineering review was received by our office on March 27, 2007 and will be processed using the Project Manager Program. The enclosed information provides a summary of the fee estimate for the anticipated work disciplines and also discusses the submittal process and disclaimers which may affect the final permit fees. The fee estimate includes the scope of work for engineering plan review only and does not evaluate other final plat requirements such · as construction inspection and review of plat recording documents. During our initial screening process of the engineering plans, it was determined that numerous standard design documents for evaluating the plat requirements were not included in the ~ubmittal. : The design, items identified during the screening process are. listed as disclaimers on the attached fee. estiml\te form. Due to-the missing information, the fee summary is. 3: rough estimate and is subject to' modification based upon the fee estimate disclaimers. To provide an efficient process for review of the engineering plans, it is recommended that the missing design information be addressed in your next submittal with the required fee payment. Sara Slatten April6,2007 Page 2 In addition to engineering design documents, our Department must also review and approve the recreation space plan as required by plat conditions. Please be a..yare that the recreation plan must be submitted to our planning section as a separate permit application with fee payment. For further information regarding the submittal process for recreation plans, please contact Kim Claussen at 206-296-7167. Once the attached fee estimate form is signed and submitted to our Department with the estimated fee payment, your project will be assigned for further review. The enclosed Certification of Applicant Status form must also be included with your next submittal. All fee payments shall be made to the cashier in the ODES permit center using activity number L07SRO 15 and the signed fee estimate and applicant status form shall be mailed to my attention in the Land Use Services Division. · If you have any questions regarding the permit fees or other aspects of the engineering review process, please contact the project manager, Pete Dye via email pete.dye@metrokc.gov or by telephone at 206-296-7185. Sincerely, t~ Peter Dye, P.E. Senior Engineer Enclosure cc: Rebecca Cushman @ King County 04/06/07 Land Use Services Division Engineering Review Section Project Management Fee Estimating Worksheet Current Hourly Rate: $ 144.90 Permit Type: 1Siie' P1B'ii':"shOif P1aF ~· .. Permit Type: SITEREV Subtype: SITEREVS PermiUPreApp No: L07SR015 Prepared For: lM"a'riTO Property· "i '".,.. ···,-··;·: ',r·~r ~, BLA, Engineering and ·Final Review F8e8: BudQet ;HO(Jrs LiSted :Fees Est. Date Preptif'Bd: 04/06/07 Descriotion of Fees A\Jthoritv Applicable Fix'ed Fee Hour1v F00 Initials nxea'Pee~. A. Counter Service Intake Intake Group B. Right-of-way application C. Fire Flow and Access Type of Permit 2 27.06.030 27.10.120 27.10.040 Not Applicable D. Boundary line adjustment 27.10.220 Incl. 1st 4 hours of review E. Forestry/Tree Retention 27.10.090 205.28 434.70 579.60 ·::·3:ff'':JAcres 2,173.50 F. Work Without a Permit 27.02.140 l~rlnwR8Vlew:~R) . -J @1 Qliffif11rrgV.Jw. 21 :lir.080 $ 205.28 $ 2,173.50 ETEKi .:·. ·2,Hrs. DENG: ''i 31Hrs. LENG• "'105iHrs. I Final Surve't:Revlew: (FR) ili:=-sabai~1arF-11na1fflfew. Boundary line adjustment Total ER hours ----no" 27~1)!200 27 .10.220 ETEK i ' Hrs. DENGE.,!'\J iHrs. LENG~Hrs. Total FR hours ___ 2 I Project M~erit Fees: (PM) Ber, eil'n,@. 21:02~00 Fee est. and Project Management PM Estimate '!'.; ,o;;;:f:21 Hrs. Constructablility Review, Inspection Fee '. .. lf>.i'.l:t>.! Total PM hours 18 I Curiiinf Pfariiif niiRot>tlll;!Fiii:!( P.Rff if--t&n~cts'C'aPl~parl<l119. 21.10.080 . PR Estimate::· ;i5FF2l Hrs. rcnt1ey1tt=11::•sa1GO!Sfft/g;Wl!J ~. nca e 1 • • • :so D. Nonresidential review $724.50 5 $ 724.50 $ 289.80 EICHE' $ 434.70 _JS_A_N_,: __ $ 15,214.50 -'' --''--'-'----'-- $ 289.80 '-:·-~·-· ·--~"~·· 1 $ 1,738.80 "-R"'.ci'-'Y-=E+~::.., $ asg.40 .. t.::::: :·' r Critical Area Estimate after 5 hours: ff? '.'5: Hrs. $ 724.50 .LWES··.· : 11 M. Exceptions and Variances 27.10.140 Estimate: _1 ·:_·_· _' Hrs. N. Other (Shorelines, FPA) 27.10.140 PR Estimate: Hrs. Addressin :Fees: AD 5 min. per lot Total Fixed Fees: 5 $3,103.28 Estimated Review Hours Above Base Hours: 142 Hourly Fee: $ 20,575.80 Total Estimated Review Hours: 147 Total Fee Estimate: $ 23,679.08 't ~ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov April 6, 2007 Sara Slatten Carn West Development 9720 NE !20th Place Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 RE: Permit Fee Estimate Project: Martin Property File Number: L07SR015 Dear Applicant: Thank you for submitting the engineering plans for site development of the Martin Property subdivision. To implement the engineering review process, our office will use a new procedure for managing the permit application to provide applicants with an enhanced level of customer service. A project manager will be assigned to your project to provide a fee estimate for the · anticipated scope of review and will also monitor and manage the permit application throughout the review process. Your application for engineering review was received by our office on March 27, 2007 and will be processed using the Project Manager Program. The enclosed information provides a summary of the fee estimate for the anticipated work disciplines and also discusses the submittal process and disclaimers which may affect the final permit fees. The fee estimate includes the scope of work for engineering plan review only and does not evaluate other final plat requirements such · as construction inspection and review of plat recording documents. During our initial screening process of the engineering plans, it was determined that numerous standard design documents for evaluating the plat requirements were not included in the submittal. The design items identified during the screening process are listed as disclaimers on the attached fee estimate form. Due to the missing information, the fee summary is a rough estimate and is subject to modification based upon the fee estimate disclaimers. To provide an efficient process for review of the engineering plans, it is recommended that the missing design information be addressed in your next submittal with the required fee payment. Sara Slatten April 6, 2007 Page 2 In addition to engineering design documents, our Department must also review and approve the recreation space plan as required by plat conditions. Please be myare that the recreation plan must be submitted to our planning section as a separate permit application with fee payment. For further information regarding the submittal process for recreation plans, please contact Kim Claussen at 206-296-7167. Once the attached fee estimate form is signed and submitted to our Department with the estimated fee payment, your project will be assigned for further review. The enclosed Certification of Applicant Status form must also be included with your next submittal. All fee payments shall be made to the cashier in the DDES permit center using activity number L07SRO 15 and the signed fee estimate and applicant status form shall be mailed to my attention in the Land Use Services Division. If you have any questions regarding the permit fees or other aspects of the engineering review process, please contact the project manager, Pete Dye via email pete.dye@metrokc.gov or by telephone at 206-296-7185. Sincerely, ?cl&~ · Peter Dye, P.E. Senior Engineer Enclosure cc: Rebecca Cushman -.. @) King County Land Use Services Division Permit Fee Estimate Pre-app Estimate Number: L07SR015 Date: 04/06/2007 Permit Title: Martin Property Subdivision Permit Type: SITEREVP -Engineering Plan . Based on pennit infonnation submitted by the applicant, the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) has detennined the amount of review fees for the subject application. The fees shown below do not include ancillary pennit fees, recording fees, project-related mitigation fees, or other fees that are passed through to the applicant from other agencies or as part of the project's environmental review. Fixed Fees: Counter Service Fee for Application Intake Tree Retention Review Structural Review (Determined at final approval) Other Fixed Fees Estimate for Hourly Fees: (147 Hours x $144.90) Amount previously paid as deposit Total Fixed Fees: Total Permit Fee Estimate: $205.28 $2,173.50 $ $2,378.78 $21,300.30 -$784.88 $22,894.20 Note: The estimate for hourly fees stated above is based on the total estimated number of hours not to exceed 147 hours for the disciplines listed below, and is calculated using the department's hourly rate in effect at the time the work is perfonned. Based upon the financial disclosures found on page 2, the number of hours required may be modified. The total estimated hours reflect work perfonned by the following disciplines: Engineering Review, Survey Coordination, Constructab\lity Review, Project Management, Traffic Review, Planning, and Geotechnical Review. After receiving the fee estimate from DOES, the applicant has ninety (90) days to complete the · application submittal. Please call 206-296-6797 to set up an appointment with the Pennit Center to complete your application and payment. If the applic~tion is not received within ninety (90) days, the applicant may be required to obtain a new fee estimate or this activity may be cancelled. For further questions on this fee estimate or for other requirements about this pennit application, please contact Pete Dye via email pete.dye@metrokc.gov or by telephone at 206-296-7185. Peter Dye Senior E gineer Land Use Services Division Project Manager.dot 1/26/04 Page I • @) King County Land Use Services Division Permit Fee Estimate Pre-app Estimate Number: L07SR015 Permit Title: Martin Property Plat Permit Type: SITEREVP -Engineering Plan Applicant: Sara Slatten Date: 04/06/07 Estimated Maximum Hours: 147 Total Fee: $22,894.20 The following disclaimers are attached and are part of the fee estimate for this permit. The applicant is required to submit a signed copy of this form with the application and fee payment acknowledging that the applicant has read the disclaimers stated below. Disclaimer Applicants are responsible for all fixed fees, reported hours performed in reviewing submittal materials and processing, up to the fee estimate. Changes in the scope of the project review will result in a revised review fee estimate. Fee estimates are based on information submitted to DOES by the applicant prior to finalization of the permit application. In addition, estimates are determined by utilizing historical data gathered from projects of similar type, size, and scope. The fee estimate will be the maximum fee · charged unless the scope of the project changes. Should fewer hours be required to complete the review, then the applicant may receive a refund for those hours. If items are identified that are not originally disclosed or identified later in the process, a new estimate may be required. Applicants will be responsible for any additional hours identified in a new estimate because of: I) Changes in the project and unknown or undisclosed site issues. 2) Incomplete information or errors in applicant submittal. 3) County code fee changes. 4) Fees for structural review. 5) Fees for variance applications. 6) One major and one minor set of redline comments. 7) Construction Bond amount that exceeds $500,000. 8) Tree retention plan not provided per KCC 16.82.156. 9) Street tree plan not provided. 10) Recreation plan not provided. 11) Soil amendment plan not provided per KCC 16.82.100. 12) Water Quality pond does not meet 3: I flow standard. 13) Wall heights exceed maximum height allowed in zoning code -KCC 2 IA.12.170. Keeping review fees at or below the fee estimate will depend on the applicant's commitment to complete the process review. This commitment should include submitting materials which address all County codes, policies, previously approved conditions, and responding to the County's request for corrections or additional information in a timely manner, not to exceed 90 days. Acknowledged: Applicant/Owner Name (print) Date: ___ Applicant/Owner Name (signature) Project Manager.dot 1/26/04 Page2 CAM•WEST D E V C LO P M E NT •' 1,N C ~arch 26, 2007 . Jim Sanders, Managing Engineer Supervisor King County Department of Development & Envirnnmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 ' RE: Martin Property: L07SR015 1.._ Early Engineering Review Request Dear Mr. Sanders, ' . . The following is a request to allow Cam West to submit the engineering plans for the Martin Property Plat prior to preliminary plat approval. Peter Dye recently indicated that I should submit this formal request letter to your attention .. The Martin property is a 13:lot plat, located directly south of our Shamrock Heights plat. The plat hearing recently occurred on Thursday, March 22, 2007. A final · decision is pend_ing over the upcoming weeks. The Martin property is a smaller, relatively straight-forward plat. Our hope is to submit the engineering plans early in attempts to gain approval lah:r this summer. Our goal is to start construction towards the end of the summer around late July. Should you have any questions, please call me at 425-825-1955·. We look forward . to hearing back from you. Thanks. · Sincerely, ~0 Sara Slatten Cam West Development, Inc. enclosures l ;.-11' < <'I ' > " • ' I '> 0847(0-0076 LARRY .k .JUANA NOYOLA 13226 /NIii AV£ Sf REI/TON; IYA 98055 .-------------.. NOTF:: P/10'1/DE: INTERIM PflOrE:OTION · TO ALL EXIST/NO CA TC/ BASINS P£R DcTAll, SIIEE:T 4 084710-0/15. ALAIN $MJTII IJ415 144711 AV£ 5£ RENTON, WA 98055 Will/AM IIOFFORO IJJ2J 1!6T/i AVf Sc f/€1/ION, WA 98055 PORTIONS SEC. 15, TWP. 23N., RGE. 5E., W.M. 0847f0-0107 KLAVS « MARGAR£T£ DITTMAN 24419 145TI/ Pl 5£ KtNT, WA 98042 084110-0066 MAUIVCt· &-NORIIA QUESNf:L 13218 144T// A••f Sc REI/ TON, I>~ 98055 4.JO--·-----:-: --·-·---t------+--,.,._,,._ --+-.,,.----,--.~-c-+-----1-----+------+-------------;.---,-..-1·--·-----i-----·t--·------;11----------·----l--------14JO '· --~' ~ i t ~~ • ' VJ '<( i fl C) l ti (I ----+------,------t--·---+--------r ·---~ r-->----- ~ ~ ,.1 ~~ -· -----i i~ ----- 1--1-------------+-----+----+-----+----+------1-----if---·---+-----,----+------+------=-J-~~ ------r·----1420 420 -- ----_(-__ _ £'XIS11 G GROUND ___ ..----- -----. ---____ .:.- 11 r 1,,1:. lEHwn/;. \ __ ~ (T'IP) --r-t-------+-----·t------+------+--------1-------if-----'--'-+---·----.\,---==---1+--1f-----+------1-------<f-------•------,f----1-f--f--·-------------, -- --4101-+·~--·-------~-1-~~-:::-;~-t"-'-:::.::::.. _ ...... ---.,.. -----__ .... ---- e• --· _ .... -- II II II - --------- --------- ,. 3•• 0 t.~ JOJ -• ----- ·i--- "'" " 2. 1YPI! 11-5<" W/ Ol.10 LOCKING UO TOP 415.8± (Ao..~sr TO FINAL GI/Al ) J8" o 406,76 99'-J!J" 0 0,50~ 1-------1111----------r-----J,110 SDM I 3 l"rP£ il-72'! --1---------'evl,(_QJ.!Q./J2P.!S!IJQ.J.".ID-+------1 ,OP <)/O.U (AO, ST ro FIi/AL (;RAO ) JG* r 4ClJ.25 40()1--1------~------i----+--+-----+------t------·l----~--l-----1-------+-·----:1--------t···-----+------->------I-·-----·------·---+-----1400 JiQM ,. ,....,, 11-12· !f{. ~ Ill LOCl(f/lr; UO TOP 9.7± (AOJI T TO RNAL Cf/AOE J6" I, 401,90 EX. 2 "1e •Wl.98 Ullill!i!LJ!Bl!J !jp EU.VAnO/J AT CliiiTtRlJM CTYPJ \ \ C) " <\ "' "i ,; :; • ; 87+00 88+00 ROF7l£ SCAI I , 4v HORIZON, " t'• 4' VERTICAL 1441 II AVENI.,!: SE " o, ,1 <o :; :; 89+00 .· " :; !·''1.·.1. !'°.:, I· t! I. 't1·r/''1'"[,,~l ... j.j.-.,/· ~~·· _____ __:_ ___ ____'. _l_. _____ ._. ~' -,_____:_L....:..._______~_ SCALE: 1" == 40' 0 10 80 l ,J -j j NOT£: CATCH BASINS HA VE BEEN S/Z£0 TO McET CUIIRcNT COUNTY ANO wsoor KNOCKOUT flcQUIREMcNTS ' USING AOS N-12 PIP£. NOTE:: Vl!HICULAR ACCcSS TO AOJACOIT PflOPcRTY SHALL BE MAINTAIN@ AT ALL TIMES. ANY 0/STUflBcO ASPHALT OR GRA \!fl IN THE EXISTING 0111\'1:WA l'S SHALL 8£ Re PLAC£0 IN l<INO. NOTE:: ALL STORM 011A1NAG£ PIPE MATERIAL I SHALL 8£ Pm KC/IS SPcC/F/CA T/ONS, ScE NOTE: 9 OF STORM ORAINAGE NOrE:S. SHc£T 4. NOrE:: ALL STORM DRAIN MANHOlcS SHALL BE PER KCRS OWG. NO. 2-009. SEE DcTAII., SHc£T4. CAUTION LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN IS APPROX/MA TE ANO MAY NOT 8£ ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. IT IS TH£ CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VERIFY LOCA T/ON OF UTILITIES PRIOR TO PROC££0/NG WITfl CONSfflUCT/ON. NOTE: YOU MUST CALL 1-800-424-5555 NOT L£SS 7HAN 48 HOURS BEFORE BEGINNING EXCAVATION WHERE ANY UNOERCROUNO UTILITIES MAY-8£ LOCATED. FAILUR£ Tf}_ 00 SO COULD M£AN B£AR/NG SU8STAN71AL REPAIR COSTS (UP TO THR££ TIMES THE COST OF REPAIRS TO THE SERVICE.) . LtJ1.RWo15, L02 S'R037 COU .E.S, G-~-DZ. C«np!ot!on. Doto ($-~ -<'2- C<lmp!otlon Dato .~,,~ Commont~ I >.. ~ Cl ~ c!! a:: oq: ~ ~ '1; ~ ~~ (.'j bll ~s .... o ~~ ~~ ... ~ E Cl) rr l:l g i'il ~ I 11tiH 1151.h.Avo, NE Kl11,J;ind1 WA9S034-w23 421i.821.8448 425.lni.3481 fol( SOO . .W!J-0756 toll r,eo wm,.trladassoc.com ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ <:) .... ~ I ~ ~ i:.:: (3 .... ~ a: "' t,., ~ Iii a: ).,' t,.. :;.,. ::i 0 0 ~ S( r rmr 11:cHAEl. L. UATHfSON. PE r n PROJECT Ull!YlfiOR ctAY A. Hl®]S PE FJlOlKCI' I.INDSC!PE AIICl!lrllCf FIBST suumm ».in, SC!IB: Ham.11•;;40• rm.~t";:.4' C EXPIRES; ,onuo2 e;/2:z;a St!lU' UO'l' YAL!D UNl.!.SS SJQ!/IW AND D.ITRD IOB NO. 01-108 Sl!Kl/l' NO, 2014 I (ID 2002 lRIAD ASSOCIA1<S ...... limlllllfflllllllllPIII' IIIZIIWMIIFCITllll75illllll?illl Eii"l'liill~ ii - I i I i I &: ~ ~ ~ Ci /ii ·----·--------------- PORTIONS SEC. 15, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. Hn[ ll1'vji: . \.. . ,,... , ... 12' VAD£ CRA lfl. ACCESSHQAD PEil 0£TNl, SHEET 19 I 6£.E: SHE/ff 17 1-.~ .. A ~. -,-"" t~/,-\\, t ~;. ... J ••• ) ·:2 Sff PROF/Lli1 srro;r uJ W. THRU C//REJ /1/U:T 9+4'-46, 15.54' RT (STCR) lli,J9' RT (CRA!G) ' 20 ~ 16 Nom CATCH :.BASINS HA w;: BEF.N SIZE(} TO MEET CURRENT CITY ANO V/SOOT MINIMUM WAil. Tl{ICKNESS REQUIREMENTS USING ADS N-12 PIPE. NOTF: SEE SHEET 17 FOR FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS ON NE 2ND smEET SCALE: 1" = 40' ~o ao L;;e,a,;;;J 36 --- ___ .. -- \.oul£All. 15B (i;Y£ SHEU Ii} 1Nf.10r08.3'J U'ONS AV£ NC ..: lOrOD.00 N£2NO §T- 32 . JJ r.:..' CATCH BASIN RIMS AR£ 0.10' DEPRESSEO IN FLOW UN£ AS REQUIRED BY 1HE CITY Of RENTON. NOT£: SEE Sf/EtT 2 FOR TIES TO HORIZONTAL AND VER7/CAL CONmOL vCRncAL OAIUM-NA\V BB/ HORI" NAO '?/91 OASIS OF BEARING: HORIZ. I/AO 83/91 CITY OF REI/TON GPS CONTROL N£TWOIIK HOW!NG CITY Of REJ/T0/1 MCWI/MEIITS C.O.R./11!51 (BA'!£ POII/T) ANO C.0./1./1852 ORICINAL 8£1/C//MARK: CITY OF Rl:NTC//-'1851' ~ A J-1/2' D0!./£0 BRASS. DISC 1!1111 A PUNCH MARK ON CONC!/f:11; Smff:T SW/FACE: AT 11/E CO/IS/RI/CW 11/TEI/SECTiOII OF /IE 4111 ST/IEET (S£ 128111 sm££T) 4t 1401// A\£ ~ a.EV. ~ Joa549· SECOIIDARY 8/J/C/IMARKS: TBM-A " TOP OF A l?Al!ROAJ) SPIKE 1.20' ABOlf' CR0//110 IN ntE ltf'ST fACf' CF A POltf'R POI.£ W( Tf/AI/Sf0/11,/Ef/ ALONG 1111; EAST S/0/; Of 144111 Avf/11//; 51'; Q,Q /IORTII Of NORTH £OGE CF CHIA~ POI.£ SUPPORTS POY,£11 TO //OU!ie / IJ0/6. ELEV. ;;; '1J1,ti{J TB/,/·EJ w TOP Of A /?l<!UWAO SP/Xf 1.00' AaOlf' liROUNO ,V T//f: NCRT/1- FAST-fACf Of A POY,£R POLE, LOCATE() IN THE SOUT/1 lif.ST QUADRANT Of nlf: IIIT£R5£Cl/ON OF SE tJ2//0 smm 4t , H611/ AV!/IUE SE. POI£/ J/1969 l67fi6J. £UV. ., 4Z~1i5 29 I' PR/ (t)ff-ti;f AlK (\ -----------~--~ --~-~ NOTE:: ALL CURB RADII ARE: . ,, SH0f1N ON SHEcTS 25 AND 26 NOTE: SEE SHEETS 25 AND 26 FOR LOCA7/0NS OF'MONUMENTS AND DR/\.1:WA )S TO BE INSTAil.£!), OTE: SEE SHEET 19 FOR TYPICAL OADWA Y SECTION. ALL CATCH BASINS SHALL BE: TYPE I UNLESS 01IIIIRfl1SE NOTED, ALL INLETS SHALL BE PER CITY OF RENTON STANDARD DETAIL 8-26, OTE: ALL ·STORM DRAINAGE Pl{< 'A TEli!AL SHALL BE PER PIPE AN CATCH BASIN SPECJF/CA710N$ ON SHEU 20. e to City Standards 1-f"l>1- ·---~-··--·-·--·---------·------·--·----·-----·----····-------------.. -~-. -----·-· .. ·---------·--·,. ----·-----·-··----·~·-----· -·---·-··---·-·--------·--· __ -·--------------__ -·· -· -·----·-·· .. ·---···. ····--·---·-·-··---··-----·-·---· __ . -···· ·-··-···------------·---·------,02001 lRIAD_ ASSOCIATES 11814116'.hAve. NE Kirk/emf. WA980JH923 425.821.8448 425.821.S481 fox 800.488-07!:iG Wil free mw.triad~ssoc.e-0m ., .•• ; i 'r , t, , ., ~, i:•H·1~t1 ufJ111tt M/CHMJ. L. IJATHlS<J.'11 f£ ' PROJECI' YANA.Gl!R 'tffWAJJ COOOR£Y. P!.S PROJKC!' SUJ!IDOR a.AY A. !00/,/IS, PC PROJECT BNGINKiR PRO/Et:!' L!NDSCAP! ABCHITaC!' F!RBI' SlJB.lllTIAL Dial: II /21/0 I SCALI!:. EOi!L: l'u40' \'lll<l',tN/,1 . 4/t-'l/t71. SfM' 1107 VAJ.lD . UNLESS SJGNIID ANll DA'lED =•• §! ' ;;;::. lOB NO. l)1-:108 ;~ ~~~----~~~~~ ~~ SBl!!.TNO, ·110136 i ~ ' ' ? ~ "' ·< ,, %1 ;, .- .~ .<) 'ii • -u f:~ ~! ~~ Q I:.: \~~ ~~ o$ "t •• S1 fig. ·, . '~, m ' 11.1. 1 < ,\,, ~ . i~U .,., . -··-··- ' .? "''. [ Ht.a HU , ~H.I 4tU HM HM HJ.> • • • ' ~11.) T, or BRAMRO • ' 1.i 1))0 ~-.0.1 l~l.) •~U iy>.1 ·~ti II' !, ISU ·~:u .I I 1 1, . 11 ii In --.. ·-·--... · .. 1·-·· -·-·-r-·· '-'--··· · .. rr·-· .. ,----~r:.~- , ' -·-··-;,,-:;;~: -· \ \ ,~u 01,0 '" ;o,) till!, 0 HJ.7 "' 14.U lM 11).f l • HM- 110.i · " • • • .. • tll.l i)H .. • i NO,B.TH OF 70N/NG ~.,. l)U 1»,0 4<'111, "' IU.l LJ u c:/.l f I E3) [J 01., 'L j ~ ·-·--· .... _____ __ )110 X .. ' ·~ X· I X 11a.,. ewamrs rm 712 :-r~ M X L'-!.a 11.10V ... -~ ..... ··--~ X\tU~ xa1,o "1•11 xu 11 l·· ,. ___ _ L_s 1U.}i X }(1(1.:,0 x.se,.o x'"o.1" ' x1e;,.e1 XHO-~ x1,0-:1 XH~.14 XHMI X l{Oel X HO.ti xteo.~ X 1,1.~~ XU¢~ X HO.JG X lt0.01 !~Ma X XIGO.~ xw:i.io X 1{0.~I xie~u X 1~1).~l •\ Xtt>t.H · .. ,, ~: .-.. . ·: (. . -~···· .... i . --.,iepa ': ... f • x1~0 SE 120 h ., .; J x':.4 ' . , . - ( - -l - ... ~ "fV'; I ·;r, RT Q.; ~· ). Ct: ~ :'.) f9 ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ::5 ' TRIAD As.s·oc IATBS 11614115\hAw.NC Kindand, WA 00034-6'923 425.621.8448 425.i12U181 fM 800.488.0750 toil froo www.lrlod.iG~oom Iii ti m7r:rmrw1m SEE i'.: "' I !;! A :.: ~ t5 Q; ~ :,.. ~ s g <l<J<l(]<J<]<J<J<J<J< meeme lliCX JJAT1fl'SON. PE p ROIBCI' IUIUGER /JO CONOR£.'U. PLS 8 p ROIECI' SU31'BYOR JIARK Rmi). PE ROIBCI' ElWliEilR p p ROIR<:r i.lJIDSC.IPR ARCIIITBCT FIR8I' Sl/BllllTAL DATE: s CW:: BJF!l.l NTS WIT, .. re mrwm 7 ;,i'Al!P Mr VALID i UNU'.,S SIGNIO AND DATED ll'IIPIIIIIIIIIIIIMfflRllllllllllll,f--llllllilllil a JOB NO. 01-108 for 1 § • ~ ij I ~ l g I (/) (/) I 0... 0... 0... ~ ii h i=1 !i@ 11-~ a ~:1 !i ~ I· i I I "' a. ?;: ~ 0 6i '" i .., I z D ·~ -;; "' 11 -·u r.~ cl t t;~ I :, . () ··-"k! i.i \> ag ,--1-e- }~ g ,,, -. ... -~ ._ ___ . . - -- WE: CRA~. ACCESS Pl# DETA/4 S1/li:YTo ', . 'v, . "'\ 2 ,, ,, ( '1 l 4 , .. , ~ t (" • • ' , .. t; .. At,r, ..... J/·\l"'I, ;) I ) / ) \/"[ ,,, • \) .. . I,~ 311 ~ \ \ I ' \ /' ('t}r: -rf";/' r--r-:: ,~\"1\t. I \,~ ..... I,., PG. 101 12 ··----------------------·-·------------·· ------.. PORTIONS SEC. 15, TWP. 23 N~.~. RR~GEE-:-. 551E~ .• :-viwu.Miit.--·-------------------:--~-----.-------iilfi / .fRIAD "') ./ I s:A!\eY.[ ANO REMO C E . r "' CONCR/!IE, R£Pl.tlCI: IN I , ,. 1. KINO PEI? CITY OF RcNTOf/ RU/U/REMl:ll/S (TYP) j "' .,. 47 I. , I 38 I , / / I. , I , /'/,;,u•'" ..... , ...... I 4~ I I I I 49 7-5.3 MATCII EXISIII/G IMPRO'.EMEIITS (Sf£ MORtAN Pl.tlCI: PLl//S) ,-.._ I i I 33 NOTE: 5££ SH££T 16 FOR FRONTAG£ l NOTE: SE£ SH£ET 2-FOR TIES TO IMPRO'IEMENTS ON JERICHO AVENUE NE SCALE: 1""' 40' 0 20·40 60 t;rm •• ~1rsm1w~ --·· -·-·· -···· .. .,_ ... -~-----····---·-.. -·----·--· .. -···- f/ORIZONTAL ANO VERTICAL CONmoL. -. -, --, NOTE: CATCH BASINS HA'.t£ BEEN SIZED TO M££T CURRENT CITY ANO !WOT MINIMUM WALL THIC1<N£S$ R?QUIRcMENTS USING ADS N-12 PIPE. -..... _ CATCH BASIN RIMS·AR£ 0.10' OEPRESS£0 IN FLOW LIN£ AS R£QU/RcD BY TH£ CITY Of' RENTON. w3•,;.,;! • ' ' . ..,, J,.,. . . ,;i " ,.. ' ' 'tf/WCAI. OATUM-NAID 88 / HO///Z. NAO OJ/91 UA$1S Of' OffARIIIG: HOR/Z, I/AO O:J/91 CITY Of' REIIT0/1 uPS GOii/ROi. 1/f:rofORi( IIOU!/1/G CITY OF Rl:IIT0/1 M0/1/JMfNTS C.O.fl./1851 {BASE POI/IT) AN~ C.O,R.//6!i2 · OR(GIIIAJ. 0£1/CIIMARK: CIT,Y OF R£//TOII-·,aw w A J-11r·ow@ BRASS DISC 1,111/ A PUNCH MARK 0/1 CONCRt:11: STREET SVRfAU: AT 11/t: COIISTRUCTW INTl:RSf.CTI0/1 OF NI: 4TH smEtr (SF: t28TII STREET)&, f4()TII Al:f. SE. ru:v. -J98.549 S£~CWDARY IJENCHMARKS: TBM-A -TOP Of A" RAilROAD SP/Kt: J.20' ABOVE Gt/OUNIJ 111 TH£ llfST FACI: OF·A. POi\fR POI.£ Wf .. TRA!ISFORMER ALO/IC/ THI: FAST S!Of: OF 144111 A'.ENUo SE. 9.0 //Of/Tl/ OF NORIII £Or;£ Of' <i11Alfl. PO/.o SUPPORTS POnfR TO HOUSI:, IJ0/6, ELEV. ~ ,IJ/, 56 . IDM-8 ~ TOP OF A RNlROAO SPiK£ WO' AB0\1: /iR()/J//1) ill 7111: NO/Wl- oASr FACE: OF A POJWR PO/.£, WCATEO Ill TIie SOUTH ttfST QUADR,11/( or Tri£ 1/lrEl/Sl'.CTION OF 5t: tJ2NO STR/ifl' ,t IHI/I Av!."IW( S.:: POL£ t! J/1969 167o6J, . w:v. u 120./!5 NOTE: SEE SHEETS 25 AND 26 FOR ' LOCATIONS Of' MONUMENTS AND DR/I/EWA Y.S TO 8£ If/STALLED, OTE: SEE SH£ T 19 FOR TYPICAL OADWA Y SECTION. ALL CATCH BASINS SHALL 8£ TYPE I UNLESS 07HcRl't1SE NOTED •. All INLETS SHALL 8£ PER CITY OF RENTON. STANDARD DETAIL 8-26. OTE: ALL STORM DRAINAGE PIP£ ATER/AL SHALL 8£ PER PIPE AN CATCH BASIN SPECIFICATIONS ON SHffT 20, . Chee ed for CompJ{ance to City Stqndords 4. 7'.'.-0 '2. f-8-oz.. ·~-----··--·-----·· --···--·-· A s_~.,2.c I AT B s .;.;f. .. 1 __ _ ~. 'q; ci! ~ ~ .... ~ Q i ~ Cl) i ,q; . Q ~ ~ 11814116UlAvo. NE l<lil<!end. WA S00JH'l23 426.821.8446 42.$,e21 3481 fM 800.486 07li6 toll free vr.w,.trlsda~c.com ~ ·~ ~ Cl) rmmrz 1,1/CIIML' I.. UATHES-OV. PE, FHOIKCJ: IWl!GHll t!!WA~ /Xl'IDR£Y, PIS FROJRcr SURmoa !UY A. LOOJIS. Pc PROIRC'i l!NG!!OOG! FROJR(;J' U!WSC.ll'l: ARClllfECJ: FIMl' SUlllllTl'AL _D.\l'I!: 11/21/01 SC!J.B: BOli!l: 1~•40' Vlllr.:N/A 4/~'I/Cl'.I. SJ'AllP HOT VAUD UJILRliS SIGNED Allli DATEJ) ii ()1~108 ;~ lOB NO. ~~~~~-~~~~~ ~~ Sllm NO, 1001$6 i ~ l-(i ~g ~ I ~ I ~ (J) (J) I ii CL CL 0... I I I I I 0:: u. ~ ~ R 0 6i 440 .. . 0 YR £M£1/ LO 0 12:'RFLOW EL p EL !,, oi c ~l I!: ~----ENCY ,..; ' 4JJ.~0 V . - 4J2.W V ~ '4JO -- .. 420 410 "' ~ PORTIONS SEC. 15, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. ' -. ·---LOT 5 i : "' il !.l . ~I , -" 1M I' ··- -,--. .. / ,, " PROPOSED t:1!1 ; u "'0 An£o ~I ~ I .... / --/(TWJ ~ , ..... ", / ~ --I , -" .. I / -'---\·_/ --. f -. .., \ ~ ,nota ""OVNP Ir; . \ -, --,;;; .--' " '8" ...... If: Y>",05 / ----,_ -r / -·-/ .$2'-J5' 0 0 50,f ',. ·..:.. -"'· 112'-J6"@ 0,50X .... //Jj f..,/ .10. ='£!/ aw Sf/lUCTVI< W DEBmNIARR/£11 P 'JI OETA/t., S1/{£T 2 ~ D ''1,2,'! J IE 427.05 --- ·- EXIS'7Pi,.C f!i,D o Ttlf 'fl' . cf' " <) !1 ;i, V \ I .... . .,..- ... __ --. --. 25 ,· '!...J6'" o , --,_ :, -l]~t >t'--'Pmi-,----·-------~w ' IE 424.87 98" --51'-J(;" (} 0.55; ca 0 TYPF' 11 •. s;• IE 424.44 muu 8 60" TOP 4JZ5J: TYPE 11· ; ~H OVCRf!-OW ir,(,, SOUO, LOCl<JNG uo t:: ~ ,.,. £<..._,__: .. 6' //; 42Q.OJ : cm .J 7 TvME lf-8&"' ri OU/J, LOCKING LIO 4J(,J2 W/ 50UO,' f.QCJ J8' E: 421,5J TOP 4J0.65 ......1L1£ 42.JdL . ---'---------· - I ' en a 'V,I nO/J 0 -:PS/TE s roRk1 C< NVEYANlr;E SYST. :M ., \' ' \ "' '" Q " " "' O> "' ~ ::i. "' ~ aj ~ •• "' " ti .., "' "' •• " ,, V ~ ~ " ,, ,, 1-----~·-----~------·-··-·----.---------·----.------0------~,,---... "ACT C LOT !i7 I . I I 4JQ1------!-------J.--··-·-l-----l-------ll~---~fdi2ij~iliiii.--·· -·u ----· ---4JO r .. -... -..;-n.,._"_'..i·.:::'t~.,.. .. · -1---~=F:.:;;.::...,"""'=~l--;;;.::.:l~~:__~P~-_rm • --. ~ ~ .420 "( ---. / • V '\ ~ -.. " ---./ ' ,,,·\ ~"-~ ,_ -\ V) ~ \ I c, 1--1· ---!i-------·1----'---+~----·-+--·---1----'\".:::,,,.."". _____ .... -"r-i-i' -·- 12i!!f.DSE0 '"'SI' ""'DP\ -...__ \ \'!j (rrP, :--....I""'-~ : ·1 a =t=±=f::==' y~\ _,__ ___ I \ . I I/ i.--'SIJ·4'-J6'-Q>O;QJ;f c ----· -~-420 ~ kl ~nw, rrPI': 11-54" .i!: WI SOU , Ll!Cl<IN(} LJO ~ 1--....JJTPl!l;P:.J.4~2/llf·I i,t'c..=~-~~-l------+------+-----l----·--+---...:...-1 .. ____ . ----·· (NJJUST TO FINAL GRAD£) J6' IE: 4 9,86 i ij 4101------~-------1-----f--,---------,--.,..., ---f-----__ __..__ ·1---+--· 410 £X1S1lfJ(J__GR0U D ELEVAnON ?Wf:711'/Pt: I" ' \ 4 FFSJTE \ .. ,, (\ ~ CB 4. TYPE 11-54• I ;roRM CONVEYAJ CE SYS"EM .·;r:t·,%7 . J6" IE 16.84 (IN) J6' IE; /Q.47 (OVT) c, a; ,,, ,, wr ro r-.~ .•. "· 168'-J{;" o o.~ .• IJ-84. ING LJO ·----· -· . "' aj " ., 440 - 4JO .... -· ...... ___ J;( 410 " i\' " CALE: .. _ 1"= 1"= S!::8:0 z,. tf120:ll TRIAi) ,\f.SOCIAlfS ·-····. ---····-. ---. ' . ·/~FUAD /_AS !,£.C I AT BS -.:.---. 11814 t tilth A\·o. NS . Kllt.land. WA S80J4-eS23 ~ i.;; ~. liJ Cl) ,-,I Li: lij i~ Q; ~ ~~ §~ ~ (.) ij ~ ~~ ~~ i,.;. Cf) ~ cil tt· () 425.621.6448 425.821.3~8\ rax 800.486.0756 toil frco VMW,trlad:ISSQC.ccm ~· ~ :~ 1t,j IBPI t:l~g3 ~ Ii q ~ ~ ... ~ !I: (/) ·~ ·~ ~ ~ . ifi . tc ls !).. i... <3 5 g ~~kl<l<l<l<l<l<l<l<l Ula/AEL L. I.IA THESCW1 P£ PBOIJ!CI' M!HAGfil! WWAJJ CWDRl!'f, PLS PBOll!CI' SU!lVEYOR Ct.AY A. LOOI/IS, PE PRWBfi ENGJNWI PROJECI' UliDSCAPR .LRClil!Kcr l'IBSr SUllllfiTAL D.\18: lt/21/01 SCALE: nom.: ,·;:,~f(}· mr;,,1•g4* .Bl'AJIP NO' VAllD UNl!SS SIGNHI> IND D!TIID tr? 7 10B NO, 01-108 Sllffl NO, _. ___ .. Site Plan Approval Vicinity Map '" .t " f.) O ·~ "- Approval of these plans Is for construction of road ond drainage 1-:=t-4.-------1 Improvements, site drainage & grading and temporary erosion .control In unincorporated Kl~g County only. lhese· plans do not authorize any other utlllty approval or Improvements proposed in 'l I t s ~ -• E& ',& (.) •:.: o;- SCALE: 1" = 200' 0 100 200 L, p:nr,t;;. King County Roadway Improvements LEGEND .---"•---DOUNOARY ffJ/CE LOT UNI: •, ·-· , ·-SWALE or, DJTcu I/IC/IT-OF-1'/AY -• -• -lltilLANO CUnER, now, tt CIJRO LJN£ .................. 0 ••• • HE'TtANO OUff!R -----crNTfR U/1£ =ROCl<£RY ----EASEMENT ----· ---OU!U!ING St;TUACK LI/It" (BSfJL) IT] . PROPOS£0 CRAWL --220----10' EX/Sll/10 COi/TOURS ~ EXISllNG C//Afcl. ----2/B·------2' EXISllNr; COi/TOURS ' G "fTLA/11) El ' fX/SllN/J A5PI/AlT Ill llf"/LA/10 10 Pc f/LLEO [ml] PROPOS£D ASF'/IAL T PAia/,/ ff/ T [J2 PROPOS£0 510£/VAU< . PROPOSr::D STORM DRAINAGE: ------SEl'IE/1 /JAIN I= SINGLE'.WATfR ME'TfR W/ J/~' SER'I.C/i SEl!f/1 SERl1Ct: OOUQLE' WATfR /.IETfR WI,. 58/'I.Ct: --··---WA/Ell MAIN ~ f1Rt: HWIIANT STORM ORAi/i PIPE AIR/\IAC RE1£AS£ VAL\1i' ·----------------ROOF 4< f.OOllNG 01/A!II -OLOW OfF @ SE*rtlMANIIOLE' . fl CA 1f: VAL vC <ii YARD Of/All/ ~ TEE • Cll:ANOUT 8£//0 Ill CATCH OAS///, nn: I I> R£01/C!Ti ® CArCH OAS/II, l'!Pf: II .... COi/CRETE: BLOCl<lll(l EX/SllNG FEATURES LEGAL DESCRIPTION PAI/Cf/. A: mACT 5. f.XC£PT 11/f: EAST Jl)(}.J2 FEET 11/Ef/EOf; BLACK LOA/J 5 AC/lo 11/ACI:>; ACCORDING TO THo PLAT THEREOF. RECORDW Ill VOi.UM£ 12 Of PLAI:>; PAGli IOI, Ill /(/1/G COI/N TY. WASIIINGT/)/{. PARCE:l. O: m. /1(/(/T// 201.10 FEET OF THE IIEST JOO.J2 FEET OF TRACT U. BLACK LOAM 5 ACHE: mACTS, ACCORDING TO m. PLAT Tl/£REOF. RECORDED IN l«UMI: 12 OF PLATS, PA(;£ IOI, IN 1<11/fJ COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ' TRAOr J, BUCK LOAA/ 5 ACRE TIIAG/ll, IICCOROING 10 TI/E PLAT TH£REOr. RE:t;Q{/UW lll VOLUME 12 OF PLATS. PACE 101, IN l<ll/G COUNTY, WASIIINGTON. TRACr 6, BLACK LOAM 5 ACRE Tl/ACTS, ACCORD/1/G TO mo PLAT mf/1£.0'; Rf.COi/OW Ill VOW/le' 12 OF PLATS. PAGE 101, IN f<.JN(I COUNTY. WASHl/l{;T0/1, fflACT 7, BLACK LOAM Fini' ACRE TRACrs, ACCORD/NI/ TO THE PLAT T/1£REOF R£CORD£0 Ill VCI.UME 12 OF PLATY, PACE IOI, /11 J(ING COUNTY. WASHINGTON; £XC£PT mE I\EST 150 FEET 111£RE()f/ ANO .x~r mE li'AST 200 FEET TH!J/£0F. 11/E EAST 200 F££T OF T/IACT 7 OF BLACI< LOAM F/Vf ACRE II/ACTS; ACCORDING /0 THI; PLAT R£COJIDEO Ill Vf!/.UMo 12 OF PLATS. PAGE IOI, IN KING CO(J/ITY, WAS/11110/V.V; £XC£PT THE ltf'ST 7/J FEET Of 11/E SOIJ111 120 FEET 11/CREOF. Sl/(f.£CT II): EASEMfflT FOIi TIii: I/SE OF Al/0 INGRESS ANO £.GRcSS TO A CER(,VN lifLL LOCATfO ON THE UNI; l/f:IK££11 TRACTS 6 ANO 7 OF OLACI< LOAM fl',( ACf/1: TRACTS. AS CRE'JllfD or 11/STRUM!IITS R[CORO!.D MARCI/ !12, 1949 UNOfJI KUii) COi/i/TY RECOIIQ//10 NI/MBERS J8118218 Al/0 J886217. NOTES I, INSTRUMEJ/TAll0/1 FOR THIS SURvCY WAS A 0//o WNUTE 7111:0DOUTE IJ/0 EUCIIIOIIIG 0/STA/ICE /./£AS/IRING UNIT. PROCEDURES USEO IN Tl/IS SURITT l!t11o F/W) IRAnJ/54 !.IEEnNG 0/11:XCCIJ)ING STANIIAIIOS scr or WAC JJ1-IJIJ-050. 2. TH£ /Nfl!RMATI0/1 Oll'/OTEJ) OIi mis /./AP REPR.SCIITS mi: RESULTS OF A SUHtEY /./AO£ ON DATE iNDICATfD ANO CAN 0//LY BE CONSIOCREO AS INDICATING 1Ho C8/ERAL CCWDITI0/1 EXISTING AT Tl/Ar TIAIE'. J. NO EASE:M/J/1:>; RESTRICllOIIS, OR RESVIYATIOliS OF I/ECORD ffHICII IWUJ.D Bf 0/SCLOS@ BY T/11.E REPO/IT ARE SJ/Oil//. ./. SANITARY S£11£/1 AND STQRM ORA/NACE FACILJT1£S 1/Ani' Off// ASOU/LT 7//110//G/I flW} MEASIJREMff/TS OF Tl/ii LOCAll0/1 Of m. ACC.SS STRUO/URE:i, me TOP fJ.EVATIOli OF THE STRUCTUREll, A}{O THE 11/VERf EUVAllOIIS OF ANY PIPES ENTERl/1/J Cl/ LEA11NG 11/o STRUCTURES. IT IS STAIIOA!ID Pl/ACT/Cf ro 51/0W 71//; PIPE~ COI/Nf.Olll/G nits£ STRUOTURCS AS STRAICIIT UI/Es. THIS IS ONLY AN AS$VAIPTION ANO THE AC/UAl LOCAll0/1 OF me: PIPING NUS( OE VERIFIED IN mE F/EIJ) OY 1HE CONSTRUCT/ON CONTRACTOR PRIOR ro ANY CONS1RUGTION, 5. UTIUTY LOCATIONS 5/101111 HERE:0/I ARE OASEO UPON AS8UJLT F/W) LOCA1/0II OF EX/Sll/10 S1RUCTURES. F/W> LOCAi/ON OF U11UTIES BASEO OIi LOCATOR PAINT NARK/I/GS ANO LOCA110l1S IJASD> ON UIILJTY MAPS FROM CITY ANO UllLJTY DRAll!NC.S. /J, THE: CONIRACTCR 51/AU. VCR/FY IH/i EXACT LOCATION, ELEVATIOII ANO SIZE OF EX/SllNO UTILJllES PRIOR ro C0NSTRUC110N, . 7. Tl/IS SVllvCY WAS PERFORMED tllTHOUT Tllo BfNEFIT OF A 7/7l£ 1/EPORr. BENCHMARK AND DA TUM vCRllCAL OATUM-HAW 88 / 1/0RIZ NAO 8'/91 OASm OF B,ARING: 1/()(//Z NAO 8J/OI CITY OF.RENTON CPS CONmOL NEntf!/11< HOU!/110 CITY CF Rf.NWN MO/IU!.lf.NTS C.O.R./IIJ:il (BASE: POI.VT) ANO C.O.R,/IIJ!i2 THE f/EllJ MEASIJRfJ.1£1/TS FOR Tl/JS TOPOGRAPHIC SUI/VO' 11,RE 0/JTNNED UITUZl/111 GlOUAL POS//TONIN/1 S'rSTflo( (GPS) SIJRvCY TEC/1/1/Qlji:S USING I.Elwl SR ~:ml E(/1.1/PIJ/Jlr. CQOROINATfS ASSOCIATED t\1111 THIS ORAYtl/lG ARE' PROJtOT COORO!NATES l!IIICII NAY o. COI/VCRTU) ro STAie PLANE cm, COORDINATES OY SIJ8TIIA01/NO IQO,OIJO METf//S (J21J,08J.JJJJ FEIT}, mEJ/ MULTIPLYING UY (M999UJ85), Tllo IN/IIAI. C()()ROI/IATf: CO/lvtllS/0/I WAS PERFCRMro USING Tllo Wlil'C2PD C()l,IPUTER PROGi/AM PROl1/JEO OY n/f: IVAS//1/1011)// STAie DEPART/,/!NT OF TIIA//5P(/{/TA1/0N, PRIMARY CDIITROI. POINTS ANO ACCESS/BU MO/IW£f/T POstnoNS 1!£11E f1W> MEAWRW UllLIZING CI.OOAL POSJ1/0/IING SYSTEM (GPS) SURVF:Y lcCJ/NIOl/£.5 US/1/G LE/CA SR 9500 £0/JIPMfl/T. MCWU/lfNT POS/710//S 11/AT »fl/E HOT DIRECT/.Y OI/SERV£D USING GPS SURVF:Y lcC/INIOl/lS IIERE 11!1) ///TO n/E CONTROi. POii/TS UllLJZING LE/CA EUCTRONIC row. STA11DIIS FOR lllo !.IEASURfJ./ENT OF BOlll AJIGI.EIJ ANO 0/STAJICES. THIS SURVF:Y NUTS OR fXCEWS THo STANDARDS SET BY WAC JJ2-tJO-O'IO. ()RIC/I/AL 0£1/Ct/!IARK: CITY or RENTON-•1o:;1• • A J-1/2" OOA/£0 BRASS msa 111111 A PU/IC/I MARK OIi CONCRl;TE smm SURFACE AT TIIE COIISTRUCTfri . 11/TfRSECIION OF NE 4TH S1REET (SE 128111 S111£EI) 4t HOTH AVF:NUE !it'. fJ.£v. • J98.(i./9 · Sf:COliOARY BEI/C/1/JARKS: T/J!,/-A • TOP OF A RNLROAO SPIKE 1,20' ABOI!." CROU/10 IN //If l!EST FACE or A POl',£R POI.£ W(. TfWISl'OflMEf/ ALONG THf EAST 5/0E OF 114711 AV£HU£ SE, 9.0 NORTH OF /IOI/TH E!JCE OF c.'/AITT. POI.£ SUPPORTS PO*t:R ro //OU/£# IJ0/6, [LEV, • 4Jl,66 TUl,/-/J • TOP or A RAILROAD SP/Kc 1.00' A801'C GROl/110 IN 7//E: 1/0llll/.- E"AST fACE OF A PO*f11 POI.£, LOCATfD Ill me S0/1111 ttEST QUADJIAIIT OF //IE INTfRS.Cll0/1 OF St: IJ2NO STRlE'T 4t H6RI AIV/UE Sf. POI.E # J/7969 1676QJ, mv. -420.55 SHEET INDEX 1 COVER SHEET 2 STORM DRAINAGE ANO ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN 3 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN 4 DETAILS AND NOTES NOT£: YOU MUST CALL 1-800-424-5555 NOT LESS niAN 48 HOURS BEFORE BEGINNING EXCAVAnON WERE ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MAY 8£ LOCATED. FAILURE TO 00 SO COULD MEAN BEARING SUBSTANTIAL REPAIR COSTS (UP TO mR££ nM£S m£ COST OF REPAIRS TO TH£ SERVICE'.) ,,, 5£ 116th St < ~ ~ "' ~'j ~ SIENNA SITE fl£ 41H ST Soils Map Scale 1 "= 300' \ I I f \ J \ Ag8 / \ I , __ SIENNA SITIJ L __ l I .• I AgC arr w n~,~ L_Jl __ J""J KING COI.INTY Tl "Ti __ ,.:;s:,;.E:,.:.t.:J021;,.:1:::;o.;;s~n,::1EE.;;r:......, JgJI c,l ~I I IMPROVEMENT 91 VAREA ''I ~I I -1 I I I AyC Notice Required Controctora sholt notify ope£ator~ who maintain undergcound uUl!ty 1/ne.u In tho oroa of propo~ed cxcovaUon or blaa\lng at loaot lwo .buslneOij do)'U, but nat moro thon Wn working dayJ prior to commencement of .(lxc,;watlon or domolitlon fn QCCQrtton~o with RCW TIUo 19, Nomoa <1nd t~ophono numboro of tho oporatoro of tmdorground utl/lty l!noo fn thfo projcct' oppear bolow. lhoa.o numbora eholl oleo bo uaod to aorva rn en orneJgoncy condlllooo oo toqu!rod. c1rY OF RElllOH /9AHl1AHY BEMJIJ WA 1£11 D/8 TR/CT NO. ¥Q /WAI§EJ. Sanitary Scwor & Water OWE'OT Tolcphono f1){;/!T SIXU> E>.'t:'llQY Goa Company pUGi!( BDl.tllJ EJJERQY P<lwor Compo.ny C..il! Ouforo You D/9 DJAL-A-U!G Notes fjl6:JJ 31'2·4Sl10 BCOTT TASHl(lO i10D1 #l4238 LIDA EJUCK80JI 1-8Q0-424-5555 1. Ti10 Otwo!opcr l!i r-0qufrt1d to notify thQ Lalld Ucu s,uvicou OM3!on 1 land Uae ln::ipoctlon Section, thr.Jo doyJ prior to tho beginning or conattucllon tor o preconotrucllon confcrunco and .1,1poclflcolly requeat !napac:tron boforo bcglnnlng: A. Jn(Jlo1Jlng of o!llotlon and ero:iton conUcl maa:iuroa a. C!oorlng and 9rubbln9 C. Earthwork 0. ln~tQl/atlon of coy undarground utlllty E. B0fort1 p!ac!n') aubboso, boso or pa't1ng aurfa~o F. /notallalfon of any form::. or pluo!ng ony toncretc 2, A permit mu~t bo obtoln~d from tho otflco <JI lho Ra,ldont Englnoor, Washtn9t<1n Stato Oopartmimt of Tnmi.portotlon. bofore any con&tructfon fu started on any ox!ot!rig ototo routo • J. A H;lf,aullo Proj,ol Appro.ol (HPA) Pormlt muol bo obtained from tho Wosh!ngton !itotu Ooportment of f1Gh6rloa prior to any work 'whOn re,qufrod. In any State right of woy. Site plan approval la void If tho commerclol building permit hos not been obtained or renewed within two years of approval. Subdivision pion approval Is void If tho final plat Is not record.ed when the preliminary plot approval expires. PRO RATA SHARE ASSESSMENT ANALYSIS (County Uae Only) Section Township Rongo L!liJ l2Ji!J LJ1.1..fil Tax Parcel IOIBl41TltlOI Number 10101s101* Sito LticoUon ,~ within the o/alnogo ohed(s) Pro Reta Shera Aseaeomont(o) ere: D Hequkod O Not R•Jqulred frcm Uic ollc due to dovo!opmcnt for lncrooffd :1torm wotu rur1off, Peak Runoff Aoa~amant Rate($ ) per c;.f.s. lncreaaos.(10 )'Uar, 2 hoYr stQrm) Paak Volumo Asso~mant Rote{$ ) per Ac. Ft. fncroasn(2 ;-aor. 2 hour storm) *SEE PLAN 111EW, LEFT, FOR ADDITIONAL TAX NUMBERS AGREEMENTS, PLAN REFERENCES, PERMITS ETC. Preliminary Plat Approval Ordlnanco # Preliminary Map Approval Construction Permits Received Sanitary Sower Water Dlolrlot Gas Company Power Company Telephone Other~~-~~-~~-~~-- Dote Emergency 911 Police-Fire-Rescue RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Dote Engineer Plan Reviewer t:.u~rc~ & F<>s7'e,t , ll e. Engineer Supervl$ar Traffic & Planning Engineer King County Conservation District Materials Engineer Other ·APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION Dept. Development & Envlronmeniol Services King County, Washington · 1l_ 1l CONNOR HOMES COMPANY ("126} 456-9280 ..Q e L 0.) Name PhQne O>+'~V) > C C: O ~ 8 ~ .!I 848 108TH A~. NE, Sulit> 202, BELLEVUE, WA 98004 o 11,l o · Address and Zip Codo Name Address and Zip Code D A Corporation 0 A Partnership D An Individual Phone --SO--· -EXISllNG STORM OIi.Vii PIPE -0-F:XISI/NO POilfR POI£ --SS---EX!Sll/1() SEltfff /JAIi/ ..... EX/STING WAlfR I.IE/ER --w---fXIS//110 WATfR MAIN 1 ~ CAU77QN gl LOCATION OF EXISTING UTlL/Tl£S SHOWN JS Bondi'ng inforrnat'ion l1l A Corporation "';; APPROX/MA TE AND MAY NOT 8£ ACCURATE ' . D A Portnershlp ~,! OR ALL INCLUSIVE. IT IS ni£ CONTRACTOm D An Individual A EXISllNO FIRE 1/WIIAIIT 0 EXISTl(IG CATCH IIAS/N, TYPE I @ £X1Snl1G CATC/1 BASIN, TYPE: ll rf EXlsnNO AIR/VAC RELfA5( YALvC i'l ,n ci :,: Sl ,:) 0 ii) 0 j> ti I~~ . ffi .. ~ i5 "' J!! ~ ,( 1'l ,::i, () ;~ .... I'/) :z ,c( . .J fl. 1-:;i:: IU :~ IU :> t:) lX: ll. ::i: ·- I'-, f') C:) e: (\) ,;;l -,) ,_ ·~ J) I: ::;) -7 <- :"' ;J :;~ SJ I) <( i! ~~ ii t " "' E il is -ill '~-h N .ci "l ij ij ~~2 <( z z w -Cl) l{) .... ~ ~ Cl ....f L. <l) .0 E :J z ..... 0 (!) ·-~ 0 L. Q. E I w 0. z· § ~ " .J ~ a ,. °' w C) .,: ~ " t; l!j 0 &: z 0 .... CJ z :i: i >,: I-z ::) 0 0 CJ z !2 If) L. (!) .0 E :J z <l) u.. >. +' C :J 0 0 mmrs-~ . o UNLESS SICNEO AND OAru> ----'< ~ t"• ( 0.1 \ (- ~ .~ (;; <:--... -. '-::':': .. 0 ... __ . -!.; 0 EXlSntlG S.llEI/ MANI/OLE 0-DIISl/1/G OLOIV OFF M EXIST/NO CA le VAL vC i~ R£SPONSJ8ll/TY TO FIELO VERIFY LOCA nON Restoration Bond Amount $ _..c?(-~41-1~,e.Oo><---g ~ g _r.,,.11"',A"'D"-"A"'s"'s,,o"'cl"'.t~r..,E,,,9 _______ (426/ 021.s.us ,~ OF UnL1n£S PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH~ "'~ " Name .Phone ·i :f CONsmucnoN. Pcrformanco Oond Amount 1) __ ,:.L_______ ~ ~ 5 ! ~11"'8~1"~·-'1.,.167'.=1/'-"A"'YE....,N.,,E.,,_,~K"'IR"'K"'LA=H,,.D._. c,W.e,i4~9.,,8c,,0.:34z....__ G t~.~~~~~~~~~..-~~--~~~~~~~~~~--~~~~~~------~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~----~~~~~~~~~~~~----~--~~----~~,2!:l:~);;:~:.;;J.--~~~~~~~jft)~:f.1'l.;·~~·.~vL··f~-:ol·~ ..... _.~~~----~.l~:0~11l:._A~d=d:re:s:•~o:nd:.:Z:lp~C=a=d:e~~--..... _.~~--~--Jf~h~'.e~e~t~~:::~~J~" 1()2002 l!UAO ASS0CIA1E' 1 .I !!' '. I .. -~-· -. --~--~· --~~~ _ ____.:__. V V PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE ---·-----BOUNDARY ------LOT LINE ------RIGHT-OF-WAY ====== GUTTER, FLOW. & CURB LINE ---CENTER LINE ------EASEMENT -------BUILDING SETBACK LINE (8S8L) STORM DRAIN PIPE . -------------ROOF & FOOTING DRAIN ---------------------------ROCKERY DRAIN --· • ----SEWER MAIN --·----------SEWER FORCE MAIN .............. -.................... SEWER SERVICE ---------.... WATER MAIN ---300--··--.... , .. ---·· 10' EXISTING CONTOURS .. 302·· -----, •. ,., .. 2' EXISTING CONTOURS ---420---------10' PROPOSED CONTOURS ----422----------2' PROPOSED CONTOURS ----,<--------+<------>1--FENCE --• • • SWALE OR DITCH ---------TOP OF 40% SLOPE ---· -· -EDGE OF WETLAND • • • · • •, • • • • • • • • • • • • • BUFFER LINE -11--11 II-DAYLIGHT LINE rTJ CD ROCKERY I T D CUT SLOPES l I L FILL SLOPES 'l1ftJ, RIPRAP -MAILBOX SIGN CURB RAMP STREET LIGHT ///////LL/////// NA TJVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT (NGPE) " z z , z z z z z z 21 RETAINING WALL GUARDRAIL • --• BARRICADE • @ • ® CATCH BASIN, TYPE I CATCH BASIN, TYPE II STORM CLEANOUT YARD DRAIN 8- W 8}-- ii}······ OVERFLOW STRUCTURE SEWER MANHOLE SEWER CLEANOUT SINGLE WATER METER DOUBLE WATER METER /RR/GA TION METER 0-DETECTOR CHECK VAL VE ASSEMBLY Ill DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK VAL VE ASSEMBLY , __ fl1 x--·i ;,- FIRE HYDRANT FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC) POST IND/CA TOR VAL VE (PIV} AIR/VAC RELEASE VAL VE BLOW OFF GATE VALVE TEE BENO REDUCER CONCRETE BLOCKING EXISTING GRAVEL PROPOSED ORA VEL EXISTING ASPHALT PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT PROPOSED SIDEWALK PROPOSED CONCRETE WETLAND 240% SLOPE R/PRAP EXISRNG FEATURES --SD----EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPE --SS----EXISTING SEWER MAIN ---W----EXISTING WATER MAIN --t'O----EXISTING POWER LINE --UGP----EXISTING UNDERGROUND POWER LINE --G----EXISTING GAS MAIN --rL----EXISTING TELEPHONE LINE D EXISTING CA TCH BASIN, TYPE I @ EXISTING CA TCH BASIN, TYPE II 0 EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE -0-EXISTING POWER POLE [EJ EXISTING POWER VAULT E-- EE- EXISTING GUY ANCHOR EXISTING WATER METER EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING AIR/VAC RELEASE VAL VE EXISTING BLOW OFF M EXISTING GA TE VAL VE ~--EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE () EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE I ' I I I I I . I ' I (i I 1p ! '\ , t i 11 ' 'i ' if j . , 1 •FOUND TACK IN LEAD IN CDNC. /iMON. IN CASE DOWN 1.5' 11-16-00 11 ! I i SCALE: 1" = 100' 0 60' 100' 200' ~ iE CORNER, NE 1 '4, $E 1 '4, SE 1 '4, SEC 0 I i KING COUNTY ~-~· •••••••••"•-•••••• •••••••••"•••-'- ; ~ ~~·-~~~(•;• CITY OF RE1VTON i I I LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER LAND AMERICA TRANSNA TION TITLE REPORT ORDER NO. CS-20096926, OA TED OCTOBER 20, 2004 AT 8:00 AM. THE SOUTH //ALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANCE 5 EAST, W.M .. IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 16 FEET THEREOF; ANO EXCEPT THE EAST 150 FEET THEREOF; AND THE SOUTH 14 FEET OF THE NORTH JO FEET OF THE EAST 150 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10; EXCEPT THE EAST JO FEET THEREOF TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS ANO EGRESS ANO ROAO PURPOSES OVER THE NORTH 16 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; EXCEPT THE EAST JO FEET THEREOF SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STA TE OF WASHINGTON. HORIZONTAL DATUM HORIZONTAL NAO 83/91 VERTICAL DA TUM VERTICAL-NAV/J 88 BENCHMARK AND DA TUM CITY OF RENTON SURVEY CONTROL NETWORK MONUMENT /1852 J" BRASS SURFACE MONUMENT FOUND AT THE CORNER OF NE 4TH STREET(SE 128TH ST.) ANO 148TH AVE SE EL.=454 .. 78' "TBM A• SET RR SPIKE IN ~ FACE OF UTILITY POLE NOTES .8' ABOVE GRADE EAST SIDE OF 148TH A VE SE EL.=484.7' * ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES ON SITE ARE TO BE REMOVED * OFF SITE PARCEL LINES, BUILDINGS & WETLAND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROIMA TE * TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS SHOWN ARE BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY OF THE SITE * THIS PROPERTY SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT ANO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF GRANTED TO SNOQUALMIE FALLS WHITE Rl\£R POWER COMPANY FOR A POLE LINE. RECOROEO AUGUST ,J, 1904 UNDER RECORDING NO. 305589. THE LEGAL OESCRIPTON CONTAINED IN SAIO DOCUMENT IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO LOCATE THE EASEMENT. i,., .. ,_ ...... -----··--- 1 ·-------.......... ---·-.... --------------------------- NOTE: MAILBOX LOCA RON AND TYPE HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE HIGHLANDS STA 98056 RENTON, WA ON JULY 9, 2007. PLEASE SEE KING COUNTY MAIN FILE FOR APPROVED PLAN. PROJECT INFORMATION YOU MUST CALL 1-800-424-5555 NOT LESS THAN 48 HOURS BEFORE BEGINNING EXCA VA RON WI-IERE ANY UNDERGROUND URURES MAY BE LOCATED. FAILURE TO DO so COULD MEAN BEARING SUBSTANRAL REPAIR COSTS. PROJECT DEVELOPER: ENG/NEER/SURVEYOR: GEOTECH. ENGINEER: TESC SUPERVISOR: CAMWEST REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT, INC. 9720 NE 120TH PLACE, SUITE 100 KIRKLAND, WA 98034 (425} 825-1955 CONTACT: JENNIFER REINER TRIAD ASSOC/A TES 12112 115TH A VE NE KIRKLAND, WA 98034 CONTACT: GERRY BUCK (425} 821-8448 ASSOC/A TED EARTH SCIENCES 911 FIFTH A VENUE, SUITE 100 KIRKLAND, WA 98033 CONTACT: KURT MERRIMAN (425} 827-7701 CAMWEST REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT, INC. 9720 NE 120TH PLACE SUITE 100 CAURON LOCA RON OF EXISRNG URL/RES SHOMJ IS APPROX/MA TE AND MAY NOT BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VERIFY LOCA RON OF URL/RES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCRON. NOT£ TO CONmACTOR: RECORD DRAWINGS PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS, RECORD DRAWINGS MUST BE PREPARED BY THE ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED TO THE PERM/Tr/NG AGENCY FOR REVIEW/APPROVAL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ANTICIPATE NEED FOR AS-BUILT FIELD SURVEY AND NOTIFY THE SURVEYOR WHEN FACILITIES ARE CONSTRUCTED, ACCESSIBLE AND READY FOR SURVEY. TO AVOID DELAY AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH RE-EXCAVATION, OR ADDITIONAL SERVICES TO S'1 TISFY OSHA REQUIREMENTS FOR WORK WITHIN CONFINED SPACE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL: Vicinity Mop (N TS) TO 1-4 5 SE 120th ST S£ 124lh NE 4th ST '--SITE rsick'; •. ,Oo"""· ,o~~,,, Soils Mop (N TS) \', \ r' I I ' I I \ \ ' AgB ' I I \ SE I.J2nd ST SE I.J.Jrd er '· I j \ ' i PARK & RIDE AgC \ " ) \ f----I I } E/h' I \ ~-I ,' EvB I I I I \' i ' ' . . '-..... ' \ \ -,, I ' ' NE 4 TH A \';,/VUE ,---: . ..: c.::....__: ' ' I Notice Required '· Contractor's shall notify operators who maintain underground utility lines in the area of proposed excavation or blasting at least two business day'!?','. but not more than ten working days prior to commencement of excavatiorl or demolition in accordance with RCW Title 19. Names and telephone nurrib·ers of the operators of underground utility lines in this project appear beloW. These numbers shall also be used to serve In an emergency conditions as required. \ Phone CITY Of RENTON (425) 255 9600 Sanitary Sewer WA TER DISTRICT 90 (425.) 255 91/00 Woter District PUGET SOUND ENERGY (206) 447 .12.36 Gas Company PUGET SOUND ENERGY (206.) 447 J/69 Power Company Site Pl an Approval Approval of these plans is for construction of road and drainage improvements, site drainage & grading and temporary ero~ion control in unincorporated King County only. These plans do not authorize any other utility approval or improvements proposed in any State right of way. Site plan approval is void if the commercial building permit has not been obtained or renewed within two years of approval. Subdivision plan approval is void if the final plat is not recorded prior to the preliminary plat approval expiration . Section PRO RATA SHARE ASSESSMENT ANALYSIS (County Use Only) Township Range Tax Parcel Number I 11 01 12131 I 0151 1110121310151 191318131 Site Location is within the ---------drainage shed(s) Pro Roto Share Assessment(s) are: D Required D Not Required from the site due to development for increased storm water runoff. Peak Runoff Assessment Rote($ ) per c.f.s. increases.(10 year, 2 hour storm) Peak Volume Assessment Rate($ ) per Ac. Ft. increases.(2 year, 2 hour storm) AGREEMENTS, PLAN REFERENCES, PERMITS ETC. (To be completed by Consultant) Preliminary Plat Approval/Permit Issued Date: 4/3/2007 Expiration Date: 4/3/2012 Other Related Permit Numbers Received: Right-of-Way Use Permit Grading Building/Structural Other ______________ _ Board feet of tree removal on site: Cubic yards of material hauled on/off the site: __ 1~1,_0_0_0 __ Is this a erosion sensitive area site? (Yes/No): NO Note: If "yes". a Highly Sensitive Site Erosion Control Supervisor is required. See ESC plan and TIR for details. Date Ernergency 911 Police-Fire-Rescue RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL (To be completed by King County) 1· I r·of f'l$,ey uperv1sor Traffic & Planning Engineer Sensitive Areas Structural Review Engineer Other APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES @) King County, Washington en z <( _. C. _. 0 a: 1-z 0 (.) z 0 -en 0 a:: w C z <C Cl z -C <C a:: Cl -w Cl <( z -<( a: C :!!ii a: 0 I- C/) -C <( 0 a: . ' KIRKLAND, WA 98034 CONTACT: MONTE DUNN (425} 825-1955 PROVIDE ADEQUATE NOTICE TO THE SURVEYOR TO ENABLE SCHEDULING OF AS-BUILT SURVEY OF THOSE FACILITIES NOT VISIBLE FROM THE SURFACE PRIOR TO BACKFILL (WHEN POSSIBLE), AND PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE TOPS OF DRAINAGE VAULTS (ALWAYS). ALL BURIED UTILITIES REQUIRED TO BE AS-BUILT SHALL BE REFERENCED BY Date James H. Sanders, P.E. APPROPRIATE MARKERS SUCH AS SHOWN WITHIN THE STANDARD DETAILSl----c-01_1 _e._10_,_•_Y_ou __ D ... ig ____ DI-AL_A_D_1G ____ 1 _8_0_0_4_2•4-55-5•5-----+-----------D-e_v_e_1o_p_m_e_n_t_En_g_i_ne_e_r _______ ..J U) et:: w [[] SHEET INDEX 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 L1 L2 L3 L4 LS COVER SHEET CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SURVEY CONTROL AND ALIGNMENT PLAN GRADING AND TESC PLAN TESC DETAILS AND NOTES ROAD AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN ROAD AND STORM DRAINAGE PROFILES ROAD AND STROM DRAINAGE NOTES AND DETAILS POND PLAN AND SECTIONS POND DETAILS AND NOTES COMPOSITE UTILITY PLAN ROCKERY WALL DETAILS AND NOTES COVER SHEET/STREET TREE PLANTING PLAN TRACT B & C PLANTING PLAN PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS TREE RETENTION/REPLACEMENT PLAN TREE RETENTION REQUIREMENT NOTES AND DETAILS OF THESE PLANS. IF A UTILITY MARKER IS DESTROYED OR REMOVED BEFORE AS-BUILT INFORMATION IS ACQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, IT WILL BE THE CONTRACToR·s RESPONSIBILITY TO EXPOSE SUCH UTILITY FOR MEASUREMENT. OR, BUT ONLY IF ACCEPTABLE TO THE PERM/Tr/NG AGENCY OTHERWISE MAINTAIN AN ACCURATE RECORD OF DRAINAGE VAULT/FLOW RESTRICTOR DIMENSIONS, PENETRATIONS AND INVERT ELEVATIONS; SANITARY SEWER AND STORM DRAINAGE TEE LOCATIONS, STUB CLEANOUT LOCATIONS AND STUB INVERT ELEVATIONS; ALSO WATER BEND AND WATER TEE LOCATIONS, IF REQUIRED; ADDITIONALLY, IF REQUIRED, THE TOP OF WATER MAIN ELEVATIONS AT 50' O.C. SHALL BE RECORDED. THESf RECORDS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO TRIAD ASSOCIATES UPON COMPLETION OF UTILITY/DRAINAGE WORK. REVIEWED BY: MICHAEL MOODY. PE DA TE: 4/17/07 NO. DATE REVISIONS 1 6/29/ol PER KC LETTER 6/12/07 2 B/10/01 PER KC LETTER 7 /25/07 3 B/30/01 PER KC LETTER 8/21 /07 4 9/20/ol PER KC EMAIL 9/12/07 5 1/21/oB REVISED PER CLIENT REQUEST 6 /19/0 REVISED PER KC LETTER 2/13/08 BY CK KMP RS KMP RS PCE RS KMP RA JEM RA TVW RA Notes 1. The Developer Ts required to notify the Land Use Services Division, Land Use Inspection Section (206) 296-6642, three days prior to the beginning of construction for a preconstruction conference and speclflcally request Inspection before beginning: A. Installing siltation and erosion control measures 8. Clearing and grubbing C. Earthwork D. Installation of any underground utility E. Before placing subbose, base or paving surfaces F. Installation of any forms or placing any concrete 2. A permit must be obtained from the office of the Resident Engineer, Washington State Department of Transportation, before any construction is started on any existing state route. 3. A Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) Permit must be obtained from the Washington State Department of Fisheries prior to any work when required. _________________ ....., __ ..... --1 ·--, Bonding Information Restoration Bond Amount $ _______ _ Performance Bond Amount $ _______ _ 0. {5 " L L 0) ., ., +-' C C C/l :: ~ 2 OOf--- 00 PROJECT CONTACT INFORMATION (To be completed by Consultant) CAMWEST Name (4251 825-1955 Phone 2 ::) z w __J LL 97.20 NE 120TH PLACE, SUITE 100 KIRKLAND, WA 98034 Address and Zip Code D A Partnership D An Individual .,C..,AwMO.JWEwa.-:1S.LT____..R,_E,,Ac&.L_E,;;,.-:,S.LT..,A'-'T;'-"E'--------(4251 825-1955 Name Phone 9720 NE 120TH PLACE, SUITE WO KIRKLAND, WA 96034 Address and Zip Code D A Corporation D A Partnership D An Individual U) w 0 0 aJ O ti, TRIAD ASSOCIATES ·->. (Uc Name (4251 821-8448 Phone ~ Q) t:'. ~ ·01 WA 98034 . . L (].J .D E ::J z > .... a: w C. 0 a: C. I... (].J _Q E ::J z >, +-' > u Q) --~ 0 L o_ 2. '" 0 ? 00 I ;;:; (].J oo C ~ 0 ~ ..c ~ Q_ I.... 0 +-' 0 C ·-'CJ I.... 0 0 u +-' 0 Q) ·~ 0 I... Q_ . z 0 I- Cl z -:c en ; >' 1-z ::, 0 (.) Cl z -~ 0 z +-' C (].J E 0. 0 (].J > (].J 0 © 2008 TRIAD ASSOCIATES Sheet 1 of 12 c°l ~ 0 ..5 12112 115TH A VE NE KIRKLAND, D D Address and Zip Code ------------------------·-- . ® April2?, 1994 TO: Gary Kohler, Manager, Land Use Services Division Department of Development and En\'ironmental Services (ODES) TTN: Jim Sanders, P.E., Development Engineer loyd Neal, P .E., Traffic Engineer, Traffic and.Planning Section ulette Nonmm P.E., Development Review Engineer ecific tions for Illumin io of Sa Curves n id n!i I tr RECEIVED King County's illumination rcquiremenl.s on arterial streets differ from those required by Pus et Power for residential streets. Section 2,12C, of the 1993 Kins County Road Standards, aUows DDES to apprpve illumination as a means of mitigating deficient $Ilg vertical curves for night time coaditions. In an effort to eliminate inconsislencies in illumination designs, this office met with :Puget Powe1· regarding cdteria for illuminating sag verticnl curves on residential streets. We mutually agreed on a minimum light level of0.4 foot-candles and a 6: J LJrtiformily ratio. To meet these criteria, design reSide11tial street Jjgh1ing as follows: 100 watt High Pressure SodiLJm luminaire~ • 25 fuot mounting height I 00 to 120 foot spacing, throughout lhe sag curve, as defifled by King County Road Standards Illumination plans, which incorporate these elements, will provide· night. time rto~ping sight distil.nee on roadway widths of22 to J6 feet, without excessive illumination of neighboring homes. l request that )'our engineering review staffut11ize these standards in future considerations. If you have any que,tions concerning I his m11tter, please contact Paulette Nonnan at 296·6596, cc: Greg Pris.bee, Uglltlng Engineer, Puget Power Harold Taniguchi, Interim Manager, Roads and Engineering Division ATTN: Tom Bertek, Road Variance Engineer, Engineering Services Linda Smilh, Signal Operations and Design Engineer ' ' -•• .4 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land UH Services Division ROAD STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUEST TO THE COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER 900 0$k.1;1Sdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206--296-6600 TIY 206-266-7217 For alternate fonnats, call 206-296-6600. Project Name; Martin Property Project Addmss and Parcel Number: 10230593'3 Appl!canf/Deslgn Engineer Name: CamWesV Rebecca=C"~'~"m~•=•----- Address: 12112 115111 Ave NE City, State, ZIP: Kirkland, WA 98034 DOES File No.: l ne ng Firm Name: Triad Associates Telephone: 425 821--8448 ODES Engineer lnilials: D Route Appl(cation to LUIS D Check here if project engineering plans are approved and oonstruction has begun. INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT/DESIGN ENGINEER: Please be sure to include all plans, sketches, photos and maps which may assist in complete review and consideration of your variance request. For a complete list of road variance submlttal requirements, refer to separate tist from ODES. Failure to provide all pertinent information may result !11 delayed processing or denial of request Please submit this request and app!k:able fee to the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) Pem1it Center at 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219. To make an appointment for permit submittal, please call 206-296-6797. For more infonnation, refer to the ODES Web site, www.metrokc.gov/ddes. l':t:1il#~JOOean'!l$WJ!lG;)®llN-'ll\1R'l\i~JffltJ~ffii!<i!MN6i;~,;,,"""'£''·""'1 DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUEST: lntersectlon stopping Sight Distance: Illumination on Sag Cuive. APPLICABLE SECTION(S) OF STANDARDS: 1993 KC Road Standards 2.12C and 0. JUSTIFICATION {see attachmen~. pages see attached AUTHORIZATION SIGNATURES: ODES STAFF RECOMMENDATION ---to ---): NSPORTATION AUTHORIZATiON Conditioned A I D Denied Dale Dale Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes l,Heq-rdvar.pdf 0912M005 Pltge 1 of 1 SE 1/4, SE 1/4, SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23N., RANGE 5E., W.M. DECISION; THE PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT OF MARTIN, AS REVISED AND RECEIVED ON APRIL 21, 2006, IS APPROVED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLi.OWiNG CONDITIONS OF FINAL PLAT APPROVAL: 1. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL PLATT/NG PROVISIONS OF TITLE 19A OF THE KING COUNTY CODE. 2. ALL PERSONS HAVING AN OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SHALL SIGN ON THE FACE OF THE FINAL PLAT A OEOICA T!ON THAT INCLUDES THE LANGUAGE SET FORTH IN KING COUNTY COUNCIL MOTION NO. 5952. 3. THE PLAT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE BASE DENSITY AND MINIMUM DENSITY REQUIREMENTS OF THE R-4 ZONE CLASS/FICA T!ON. ALL LOTS SHALL MEET Tl/£ MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE R-4 ZONE CLASS/FICA TION OR SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE FACE OF THE APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT, WHICHEVER IS LARGER, EXCEPT Tl/AT MINOR REVISIONS TO THE PLAT WHICH 00 NOT RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES MAY BE APPROVED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT SERVICES. ALL PLAT BOUNDARY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE R£SOL V[D TO THE SATISFACTION OF ODES PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF THE FINAL PLAT DOCUMENTS. AS USED IN THIS CONDITION, 'DISCREPANCr" IS A BOUNDARY HIATUS, AN OVERLAPPING BOUNDARY OR A PHYSICAL APPURTENANCE WHICH IND/CA TES AN ENCROACHMENT, LINES OF POSSESSION OR A CONFLICT OF TITLE. 4. THE APPLICANT MUST OBTAIN FINAL APPROVAL FROM THE KING COUNTY HEAL TH DEPARTMENT. 5. ALL CONSTRUCTION AND UPGRADING OF PUBLIC AND PR/VA TE ROADS SHALL 8£ DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS ESTABLISH£0 AND ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 11187, AS AMENDED (1993 KCRS). 6. THE APPLICANT MUST OBTAIN THE APPROVAL OF THE KING COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER FOR THE ADEQUACY OF THE FIRE HYDRANT, WATER MAIN, AND FIRE FLOW STANDARDS OF CHAPTER 17.08 OF THE KING COUNTY CODE. ALL FUTURE RES1D£NC£S CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION ARE REQUIRED TO BE SPRINKLERED (NFPA 130) UNLESS THE REQUIREMENT IS REMOVED BY THE KING COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL OR HIS/HER DES/GNEE. THE FIRE CODE REQUIRES ALL PORTIONS OF THE EXTERIOR WALLS OF STRUCTURES TO 8£ WITHIN 150 FEET (AS A PERSON WOULO WALK VIA AN APPROVED ROUTE AROUND THE BUILDING) FROM A MINIMUM 20-FOOT WIDE, UNOBSTRUCTED DRIVING SURFACE. TO QUALIFY FOR REMOVAL OF THE SPRINKLER REQUIREMENT, DRIVING SURFACES BET'NEEN CURBS MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 28 FEET IN WIDTH WHEN PARKING IS ALLOWED ON ONE SIDE OF THE ROAOWA Y. ANO A MINIMUM OF 36 FEET IN WIOTH WHEN PARKING IS PERMITTED ON BOTH SIDES. THE ROAD WIDTH REQUIREMENT APPLIES TO BOTH ON-SITE ACCESS AND ROADS ACCESSING Tl/£ SUBDIVISION. STORM DRAINAGE: 7. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL SHALL REQUIRE FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE DRAINAGE PROVISIONS SET FORTH IN KING COUNTY CODE 9. 04. COMPLIANCE MAY RESULT IN REDUCING THE NUMBER ANO/OR LOCA T!ON OF LOTS AS SHOWN ON Tl/£ PRELIMINARY APPROVED PLAT. PRELIMINARY REVIEW HAS IDENTIFIED THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, WHICH REPRESENT PORTIONS OF THE DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS. ALL OTHER APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN KCC 9.04 ANO THE SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL (SWDM) MUST ALSO BE SA T!SFIED DURING ENGINEERING AND FINAL REVIEW. A. ORAINAGE PLANS AND ANALYSIS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 2005 KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL. DDES APPROVAL OF Tl/£ DRAINAGE AND ROADWAY PLANS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. 8. STANDARD PLAN NOTES AND A CONSTRUCT/ON SEQUENCE AS SPECIFIED IN THE KING COUNTY DRAINAGE MANUAL SHALL BE SHOWN ON Tl/£ ENG/N££RING PLANS (REFERENCE SECTION 78). C. A STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION ANO SPILL (SWPPS) PLAN SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE PROJECT ENGINEERING PLANS AS REQUIRED IN CHAPTER 2 OF THE DRAINAGE MANUAL. 0. STORM WATER FACILITIES SHALL BE DESIGNED USING THE KCRTS CONSERVA T/ON FLOW CONTROL STANDARD. WATER QUALITY FACILITIES SHALL ALSO BE PROVIDED USING THE BASIC WATER QUALITY PROTECTION MENU. IF THE PROPOSED ONSITE STORM WATER POND IS USED AS A WET PONO FOR WATER QUALITY TREATMENT, THE FACILITY SHALL BE REVISED AS NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS FOR A 3:1 FLOW PATH FOR WATER QUALITY TREATMENT AS OUTLINED IN THE DRAINAGE MANUAL. E. TO IMPLEMENT THE REQUIRED BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) FOR TREATMENT OF STORM WATER, THE FINAL ENGINEERING PLANS AND TECHNICAL INFORMA T!ON REPORT (TIR) SHALL CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE DESIGN STANDARDS. THE REQUIREMENTS FOR BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ARE OUTLINED IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE DRAINAGE MANUAL. THE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL ADDRESS THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS ON THE FINAL ENGINEERING PLANS AND PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS FOR IMPL£M£NTA TION. TH£ FINAL RECORDED PLAT SHALL INCLUDE ALL REQUIRED COVENANTS, EASEMENTS, NOTES, AND OTHER DETAILS TO IMPLEMENT THE REQUIRED BMP'S FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT. F. ALL RUNOFF CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE LOCA TEO IN A SEPARATE TRACT AND DEDICA TEO TO KING COUNTY UNLESS PORTIONS OF THE DRAINAGE TRACT ARE USED FOR RECREA T!ON SPACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH KCC 21A.14.180. G. DURING PRELIMINARY REVIEW. THE APPLICANT RECEIVED APPROVAL FOR A DRAINAGE ADJUSTMENT (L06V0043) REGARDING THE BUILDING SETBACKS FOR CONSTRUCTING AN OFFS/TE ORA/NACE PIPE WITHIN THE ADJACENT PLAT OF SHAMROCK. THE FINAL ENGINEER/NG PLANS SHALL SHOW THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTING THE OFFS/TE PIPE ANO OEMONSTRA TE COMPLIANCE WITH All. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AS LISTED IN THE DRAINAGE ADJUSTMENT DECISION. TO ASSURE AOEQUA TE CAPACITY IS PROVIDED FOR CONVEYANCE OF STORM WATER FROM THE ONS/TE DETENTION POND, THE OVERFLOW SYSTEM ANO CONVEYANCE PIPE SHALL BE DESIGNED AT A MINIMUM FOR THE TOOYEAR STORM BASED UPON DEVELOPED SITE CONDITIONS. H. AS DEPICTED BY FIELD TOPOGRAPHY ON THE SITE PLANS, AN UPSTREAM DRAINAGE BASIN IS LOCATED EAST OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE FINAL ENGINEERING PLANS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO ADDRESS ANY REQUIREMENTS FOR BYPASS OF UPSTREAM DRAINAGE AS DESCRIBED ON PAGE 1-42 IN THE DRAINAGE MANUAL. DUE TO GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS ON THE SITE, THE DESIGN ENGINEER SI/ALL ALSO EVALUATE THE NEED FDR INTERCEPTOR TRENCHES AND EASEMENTS FOR CONVEYANCE OF ORA/NAG[. AS' SHOWN IN APPLICANTS DRAINAGE REPORT SITE MAP, AN EXISTING FRENCH DRAIN IS LOCATED IN THE EASTERN PO/IT/ON OF THE SITE WHICH SHOULD BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED. BASED UPON THE FINAL DESIGNS, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MAY BE REQUIRED TO CONVEY SURFACE OR GROUND WATER THROUGH THE PROJECT. /, AS SHOWN ON THE APPLICANT'S PRELIMINARY SITE PLANS, THE EXISTING STORM SYSTEM LOCATED NEAR THE WEST PROPERTY LINE SHALL BE REMOVED DURING SITE CONSTRUCT/ON. THE EXISTING PIPES AND CATCH BASINS S'HALL BE SHOWN ON THE FINAL ENGINEERING PLANS WITH APPLICABLE NOTES AND/OR DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR REMOVAL. ACCESS/ROADS: 8. THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 1993 KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS (KCRS) INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: A. ROAD A SHALL BE IMPROVED AS AN URBAN MINOR ACCESS STREET. 8. THE FRONTAGE ROAD (SE 125Tt-l ST) ALONG TRACT A SHALL BE IMPROVED FULL WIDTH AS AN URBAN SUBACCESS STREET AND SHALL EXTEND WESTERLY FROM THE PROJECT ENTRANCE AT 146TH AV[ SE TO 144TH PLACE WITHIN THE SHAMROCK PLAT. SIXTEEN FEET OF ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE DEDICATED FOR COMPLETION OF THE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS. A TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC LOCATED ON LOTS 38 AND 39 WITHIN THE SHAMROCK PLAT SHALL BE REMOVED UPON COMPLETING THE ROAD CONNECTION. DESIGN STANDARDS FOR REMOVING A TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC ARE PROVIDED IN KCRS 2.080. IN THE EVENT OFF SITE RIGHT-OF-WAY IS NOT AVAILABLE TO CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS TO CONNECT WITH 144TH PLACE SOUTHEAST, SOUTHEAST 125TH STREET SHALL BE IMPROVED IN THE MANNER STATED ABOV[ TO THE WEST BOUNDARY OF THE MARTIN PLAT. A TEMPORARY CUL-OE-SAC OR OTHER PROVISION FOR £M£RG£NCY VEHICLE TURN AROUNO MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE KING COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL. C. AS SHOWN ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAT MAP, AN EXISTING EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS IS LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THE PLAT AND EXTENDS EASTERLY TO 148TH A VE SE. ANY RIGHTS OF DIRECT VEHICULAR ACCESS TO 148TH A VENUE SOUTHEAST GRANTED TO THE MARTIN PROPERTY BY THIS EASEMENT SHALL BE EXTINGUISHED PRIOR TO OR CONCURRENT WITH FINAL PLAT RECORDING. D. STREET TREES SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE DESIGN OF ALL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, AND SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 5.03 OF Tl/£ KCRS. E. MOD/FICA T!ONS TO THE ROAO STANOAROS SHOWN ABOV[ MAY BE CONSIDERED BY KING COUNTY PURSUANT TO THE VARIANCE PROCEDURES IN KCRS 1.08. 9. THERE SHALL BE NO DIRECT VEHICULAR ACCESS BETWEEN THIS PLAT AND 148TH AV[ SE, EXCEPT FOR THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY THAT SERVES THE ABUmNG PROPERTY FROM THE 15 FOOT WIDE "PANHANDLE" TRACT. A NOTE TO THIS EFFECT SHALL APPEAR ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS ANO THE FINAL PLAT. 10. OFF-SITE ACCESS TO THE SUBDIVISION SHALL BE OVER A FULL-WIOTH, DEDICATED AND IMPROVED ROAD WHICH HAS BEEN ACCEPTED BY KING COUNTY FOR MAINTENANCE. IF THE PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD HAS NOT BEEN ACCEPTED BY KING COUNTY AT THE TIME OF RECORDING, THEN SA/0 ROAD SHALL BE FULLY BONDED BY THE APPLICANT OF THIS SUBDIVISION. F. (DELETED) 9. THERE SHALL BE NO DIRECT VEHICULAR ACCESS BETWEEN THIS PLAT AND 148TH AV[ SE, EXCEPT FOR THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY THAT SERVES THE ABUmNG PROPERTY FROM THE 15 FOOT WIDE "PANHANDLE" TRACT. A NOTE TO THIS EFFECT SHAU. APPEAR ON THE ENGINEER/NG PLANS AND THE FINAL PLAT. 10. OFF-SITE ACCESS TO THE SUBDIVISION SHALL BE OVER A FULL-WIDTH, DEDICATED AND IMPROVED ROAD WHICH HAS BEEN ACCEPTED BY KING COUNTY FOR MAINTENANCE. IF THE PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD HAS NOT BEEN ACCEPTED BY KING COUNTY AT THE TIME OF RECORDING, THEN SAID ROAD SHALL BE FULLY BONDED BY THE APPLICANT OF THIS SUBDIVISION. 11. (DELETED) M/77GA llON/IMPACT FEES; 12. THE APPLICANT OR SUBSEQUENT OWNER SHALL COMPLY WITH KING COUNTY CODE 14.75, MITIGATION PAYMENT SYSTEM (MPS), BY PA YING THE REQUIRED MPS FEE AND ADMINISTRA T!ON FEE AS DETERMINED BY THE APPLICABLE FEE ORDINANCE. THE APPLICANT HAS THE OPTION TO EITHER: (1) PAY THE MPS FEE AT THE FINAL PLAT RECORDING, OR (2) PAY THE MPS FEE AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE. IF THE FIRST OPTION IS CHOSEN, THE FEE PAID SHALL BE THE FEE IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF PLAT APPL/CA T!ON AND A NOTE SHALL BE PLACED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT THAT READS, "ALL FEES REQUIRED BY KING COUNTY CODE 14.75, MITIGATION PAYMENT SYSTEM (MPS), HAVE BEEN PA/0." IF THE SECOND OPTION IS CHOSEN, THE FEE PAID SHALL BE THE AMOUNT IN EFFECT AS OF THE DA TE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPL/CA T!ON. 13. LOTS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION ARE SUBJECT TO KING COUNTY CODE 21A.43, WHICH IMPOSES IMPACT FEES TO FUND SCHOOL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED TO SERVE NEW DEVELOPMENT. AS A CONDITION OF F1NAL APPROVAL, F1FTY PERCENT (50%) OF THE IMPACT FEES DUE FOR THE PLAT SHALL BE ASSESSED AND COLLECTED IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO THE RECORDING, USING THE FEE SCHEDULES IN EFFECT WHEN THE PLAT RECEIVES FINAL APPROVAL. THE BALANCE OF THE ASSESSED FEE SHALi. BE ALLOCATED EV[NL Y TO THE DWELLING UNITS IN THE PLAT AND SHALL BE COLLECTED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE. RECREA 710NAL AREA; 14. THE PLAT SHALL PROVIDE SUITABLE RECREATION SPACE CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF K.C.C. 21A.14.180 AND K.C.C. 2/A. 14.190 (I.E., CHILDREN'S PLAY EQUIPMENT, SPORT COURT{SJ PICNIC TABLE[S}, BENCHES, ETC.). A. A DETAILED RECREA T!ON SPACE PLAN (I.E., LOCATION, AREA CALCULA T!ONS, DIMENSIONS, LANDSCAPE SPECS, EQUIPMENT SPECS, ETC.) SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY ODES PRIOR TO OR CONCURRENT WITH THE SUBMITTAL OF ENGINEERING PLATS. 8. A PERFORMANCE BONO FOR RECREATION SPACE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE POSTED PRIOR TO RECORDING OF THE PLAT. OTHER: 15. A HOMEOWNERS' ASSOC/A T!ON OR OTHER WORKABLE ORGANIZA T!ON SHALL BE ESTABLISHED TO THE SA T!SFACT!ON OF DOES WHICH PROVIDES FOR THE OWNERSHIP AND CONTINUED MAINTENANCE OF THE RECREA T!ON, OPEN SPACE ANO/OR SENSITIVE AREA TRACT(S). 16. TO IMPLEMENT K.C.C. 16.82 WHICH APPLIES TO THE SITE, A DETAILED TREE RETENTION PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE ENGINEERING PLANS FOR THE SUBJECT PLAT. THE TREE RETENTION PLAN (AND ENGINEERING PLANS) SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF K.C.C. 16.82, AS WELL AS THE CONCEPTUAL TREE RETENTION PLAN (DA TED APRIL 21, 2006). NO CLEARING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS PERMITTED UNTIL THE FINAL TREE RETENTION PLAN IS APPROVED BY LUSD. FLAGGING AND TEMPORARY FENCING OF TREES TO BE RETAINED SHALL BE PROVIDED, CONSISTENT WITH K.C.C. 16.82 THE PLACEMENT OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES, FILL MATER/AL, EXCA VA T!ON WORK, OR THE STORAGE OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS IS PROHIBITED WITHIN THE FENCEO AREAS AROUND PRESERVED TREES. EXCEPT FOR GRADING WORK PERMITTED PURSUANT TO K.C.C. 16.82. 17. STREET TREES SHALL BE PROVIDED AS FOLLOWS (PER KCRS 5.03 AND K.C.C. 21A.16.050): A. TREES SHALL BE PLANTED AT A RA TE OF ONE TREE FOR EVERY 40 FEET OF FRONTAGE ALONG ALL ROADS. SPACING MAY BE MODIFIED TO ACCOMMODATE SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR DRIVEWAYS ANO INTERSECTIONS. 8. TREES SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AND PLANTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DRAWING NO. 5-009 OF THE 1993 KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS, UNLESS KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA T!ON DETERMINES Tl/AT TREES SHOULD NOT BE LOCATED IN THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY. C. IF KING COUNTY DETERMINES THAT THE REQUIRED STREET TREES SHOULD NOT 8£ LOCATED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, THEY SHALL BE LOCATED NO MORE THAN 20 FEET FROM THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. D. THE TREES SHAU. BE OWNEO AND MAINTAINED BY THE ABUmNG LOT OWNERS OR THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOC/A T!ON OR OTHER WORKABLE ORGANIZA T!ON UNLESS THE COUNTY HAS ADOPTED A MAINTENANCE PROGRAM. OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE SHALL BE NOTED ON THE FACE OF THE FINAL RECORDED PLAT. E. THE SPECIES OF TREES SHAU. BE APPROVED BY DOES IF LOCATED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND SHAU. NOT INCLUDE POPLAR, COTTONWOOD, SOFT MAPLES, GUM, ANY FRUIT-BEARING TREES, OR ANY OTHER TREE OR SHRUB WHOSE ROOTS ARE LIKELY TO OBSTRUCT SANITARY OR STORM SEWERS, OR Tl/AT IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES. F. THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A STREET TREE PLAN AND BOND QUANTITY SHEET FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY DOES PRIOR TO ENGINEERING PLAN APPROVAL. G. THE STREET TREES MUST BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED, OR A PERFORMANCE BONO POSTED PRIOR TO RECORDING OF Tl/£ PLAT. IF A PERFORMANCE BOND IS POSTED, TH£ STREET TREES MUST BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED WITHIN ONE YEAR OF RECORDING OF THE PLAT. AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, IF THE TREES ARE FOUND TO BE INSTALLED PER THE APPROVED PLAN, A MAINTENANCE BOND MUST BE SUBMITTED OR THE PERFORMANCE BOND REPLACED WITH A MAINTENANCE BOND, ANO HELD FOR ONE YEAR. AFTER ONE YEAR, THE MAINTENANCE BOND MAY BE RELEASED AFTER ODES HAS COMPLETED A SECOND INSPECTION AND DETERMINED Tl/AT THE TREES HA V[ BEEN KEPT HEAL THY AND THRIVING. H. A LANDSCAPE INSPECTION FEE SHALL ALSO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO PLAT RECORDING. THE INSPECTION FEE IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASEO ON THE CURRENT COUNTY FEES. SEPA: 18. THE FOLLOWING HA VE BEEN ESTABLISHED BY SEPA AS NECESSARY REQUIREMENTS TO MIT/GA TE THE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANTS SHALL DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL. 1. MIT/GA TE THE S/GNIF1CANT ADVERSE IMPACT THE PLAT OF MARTIN WILL HA VE ON THE INTERSECTIONS OF SR 900/14BTH AV[ SE AND SR 900/164TH AV[ SE, THE APPLICANT SHAU. INSTALL, EITHER INDIVIDUALLY OR IN CONJUNCT/ON WITH OTHER DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THIS AREA, THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS AT THE SR 900/148TH AV[ INTERSECTION: • A TRAFFIC SIGNAL, AND • EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND LEFT TURN LANES THE DESIGN FOR THE SR 900/148TH AV[ INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE WASHINGTON STA TE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA T!ON (AND BY KING COUNTY TO THE EXTENT SUCH IMPROVEMENTS ARE LOCATED IN COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY). IN ADDITION, AT A MINIMUM, THE EXISTING ENTERING SIGHT DISTANCE LOOKING EAST FOR THE NORTH ANO SOUTH LEGS OF THE INTERSECTION (602 FEET AND 386 F££T, RESPECTIVELY) SHALL NOT 8£ REDUCED AS PART OF THE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS. OOCUMENTA T!ON SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO SNOW THIS REQUIREMENT IS MET. ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK ASSOC/A TEO WITH .. ,THE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED BETWEEN APRIL 1ST AND SEPTEMBER 30TH. THIS SEASONAL RESTRICT/ON SHALL BE CLEARLY SHOWN ON THE FINAL ENGINEERING PLANS. IN LIEU OF THE INSTA4LATION OF THE ABOVE-NOTED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, THE APPLICljNT MAY POST A FINANCIAL GUARANT££ WITH WSDOT WHICH ASSURES THE INSTALLA T!ON OF ,T/jES8'/MPRQVEMENTS WITHIN TWO YEARS OF THE RECORDING OF MARTIN. IN THIS EVENT, INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT DESIGN MUST BE APPROVED BY WSDOT PRIOR TO KING COUNTY APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEERING PLANS FOR MARTIN. ' IF THE ABOVE-NOTED /NTf:RSECTION IMPROVEMENTS HA V[ ALREADY BEEN MADE BY OTHERS PRIOR TO THE RECORDING OF MARTIN, OR A FINANCIAL GUARANTEE HAS BEEN POSTED BY OTHERS WHICH ASSURES THE INSTALLA T!ON OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS, THEN THE APPLICANT FOR MARTIN SHALL PAY A PRO-RA TA SHARE DOLLAR AMOUNT TO T/-!E DEVELOPER WHO HAS MADE THE IMPROVEMENTS OR "BONDED" FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS, IN AN. AMOUNT PROPORTIONAL TO THE IMPACTS OF MARTIN. THE PRO-RA TA SHARE DOLLAR AMOUNT TO E/E PAID $HALL BE SET BY wsoor. AND DOCUMENTA T!ON SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE MARTIN APPLICANT TO THE KiNG COUNTY LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION TO SHOW THIS PAYMENT HAS BEEN MADE, PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT !JECORDING. THE PRO-RA TA DOLLAR AMOUNT TO BE PAID SHALL BE BASEO ON THE FOLLOWING: · ' ' • THE FINAL MARTIN LOT COUNT • THE TRIP DISTRIBUTION FOR MARTIN • THE TOTAL TRIPS CONTRIBUTED TO THE INTERSECTION OF SR 900.148TH AV[ BY THE PLATS OF ASTER PARK (LOOP0024),0STONE RIDGE (L99P3DD8), EAST RENTON (L02P0005), SNAMROCK (L02P0014), ROSEMONTE (AKA IRONWOOD -L03P0018), MARTIN (L05POD19) AND ANY FUTURE LANO USE APPL/CATIONS SUBMITTED TO KING COUNTY FOR WHICH COMPLIANCE W/Trl THE KING COUNTY INTERSECT/ON STANDARDS (KCC 14.80) IS REQUIRED AT EITHER THE SR 900/14BTH AVE INTERSECTION, OR THE SR 900/164TH AV[ HIGH ACCIDENT LOCATION. IN THE EVENT THAT EITHER KING COUNTY OR WSDOT ADOPTS A FORMAL "LATECOMER'S" SYSTEM PRIOR TO F7NAL PLAT RECORDING, Tl/AT SYSTEM MAY BE FOLLOWED IN LIEU OF THE APPROACN DESCRIBED ABOVE, AT THE DISCRETION OF THE APPLICANT, AS•LONG AS AT A MINIMUM THERE IS A FINANCIAL GUARANTEE WHICH ASSURES THE ABOVE-NOTED hVTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE INSTALLED WITHIN TWO YEARS OF THE DA TE OF RECORDING OF THE PLAT OF MARTIN. [COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY T-303 AND KING COUNTY CODE 21A.28.060A] 2. DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE TO THE SATISFACTION OF WSDOT THAT STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE (360 FEET) IS AVAILABLE ON THE EAST LEG OF THE SR 900/148TH A VE INTERSECT/ON. THE INTERSECTION Sf:IALL BE MODIFIED BY THE APPLICANT, IF NECESSARY, SO THAT THIS STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIREMENT IS MET ON THE EAST LEG. IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT Sr/ALL CLEAR VEGETATION WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG SR 900, EAST OF 148TH AVE., TO MAXIMIZE THE ENTERING SIGHT DISTANCE FOR THE NORTH AND SOUTH LEGS OF THE INTERSECTION. {COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY T-303 ANO KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE POLICY T-303 AND KING COUNTY CODE 21A.28.060A] ORDERED THIS 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 2007. \ JAMES N. O'CONNOR, KING COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER PRO TEM JAMES H. SANDERS, P.E. DE\/ELOPMENT ENGINEER Comments: -f· /J' . OJ> Completion Date Approval Dote © 2008 TRIAD ASSDCIA TES " T ASSOCIATES 12112 115th Ave. NE Kirkland, WA 98034-6929 425.821.8448 425.821.3481 fax 800.488.0756 toll free www.triadassoc.com ' ' V<111d Develop111e11l Con-sultan~ts )... I--.... i,... m § r5 0 Q: ~ a.: ~ C) 0 ,q; bi:! ~ ~ :s: ~ ~ C) j::: -~ C) (.) GERALD F. BUCK, AICP PROJECT MANAGER NICK A. YINGER, PLS PROJECT SURVEYOR RICHARO A. TOMKINS. PE PROJECT ENGINEER MEI-SH/OU UN, ASLA PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FIRST SUBMITTAL DATE: 2/16/07 SCALE: HORIZ.: N/A VE!lT.: N/A STAMP NOT VALID UNLilSS SIGNED AND DATED ' JOB NO. 04-257 SHEET NO. 2oF12 ---·· ------- EX. 15' PUBLIC WATER EASEMENT I I ................. ··--1 ru,·r ,·;r I ~ ', , , I VJ .:::~ '\ =1'"''"'1 ,.of-:l;.,/vlr, ut,.K "> . I IJJ 10 I <q; rt I~ I I.O I 'I' I ,.. I i "+ EX. PR/VA TE UTILITY EASEMENT FOR OVER HEAD POWER, TELEPHONE ANO CABLE LINES TO BENEFIT THE ADJACENT PROPERTY I I ~ .. 1. . ... ... . ...... I 1--1--............... ····· ·····--- • . EX. 70' DRAINAGE EASEMENT I REC. NO. 20060825000187 I I I I t---............ ·························- I SE 1/4, SE 1/4, SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23N., RANGE 5E., W.M. D C'T{.'"·' ''Pf'~\j L 1, ... :V ,,,A .. 1 !-···"' ·····-·····----- 1 J! r···········~--······-·~ ........ ~ ........... -~ .. .. 6 R .. , 1 I I -.-IJ.lJ.8'20'42"W . ...;;..:;:...;:......:. _____ _ 10' PR/VAT£ STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT , ' \ ' i \ ' 10 11 15 14 I I ! • 9 g '\~· I , 305" J I 1 (Ji I i I -·····-····-----,.------·-.....,-------T-~------,--:iJBB;a1'.50"wT:iiiiiJ·--..JL_i--r·--..l; _::-: _________ j 1 NBB'2o"so·w I 511.ot-1 ---,-------~ I. d /i.Q'F''''"' r,11;c;c· ! I ,o· PRIVATE STORM j I: I ,VJ ., UAJ' ' . .,.,, L, i I DRAINAGE EASEMENT I V L. 2DS, ?G(S) 58.·f! · I I i . I I I ·-··- I ··-,., SCALE: 1" = 40' 0 20 40 80 .~ j l I .. , l ! ' I • l -i , 1 I & "TBM A• SET RR SPIKE IN Vw. FACE OF UTILITY POLE 0. 8' ABOVE GRADE EL.-484. 7' JAMES H. SANDERS, P .E. DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER Comments; 1 ·tt ·oK Completion Date Approval Date © 2008 TRIAD ASSOCIATES \. T D ASSOCIATES 12112 115th Ave. NE Kirkland, WA 98034-6929 425.821.8448 425.821.3481 fax 800.488.0756 toll free www.trladassoc.com L a 11 d D e v e I o p 111 e n t C o 11 s u l l d 11 l s , I :c:: q: ~ .... )-.. ~ I--i t5 (!J .... -~ ..J q: ~ ~ ...... ~ C> 0 ~ :c:: &: :s. C> ~ ~ ct:: .... ~ Cl) ~ " ...... ~ C> e: ,q; 0 <': C> 0 ).. ~ § Cl) ti &l 0 0 ... 00 00 < ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ tl " t " " w ~ ~ ~ , ~ !;] ., ~ ~ ~ ,, """a ; ~~~~ s-ts~ t;j I ! ! ; ~ z :i fji ~ ~ ~ ~ i; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ., !:1t!!! I ~s~ .. ~ • 0 z GERALD F. BUCK, AICP PROJECT MANAGER NICK A. YINGER, PLS PROJECT SURVEYOR RICHARD A. TOMKINS. PE PROJECT ENGINEER MEI-SI/IOU UN. ASLA PROJECT LANDSCJIPE ARCHITECT FIRST SUBMITIAL DATE: 2/16/07 SCALE: BOR!l!.: 1 • =40' VE!lT.: N/A STAYP NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED JOB NO. 04-257 SHEET NO. 3oF12 v.,~' ,,,.,, .. ,,.,' 'S,"Hi, .. ,"'1,HI · SE 1/4, SE 1/4, SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23N., RANGE 5E., W.M. EXISTING POWER POLE. TELEPHONE RISERS TO BE RELOCATED PER PUGET SOUND ENERGY 16' EASEMENT AGREEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS REC. NO. 5284273 EX. 10' WATER MAIN EASEMENT REC. NO. 20000810000949 EX. CB EXISTING SIGN EX. JO' EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS ' TO BE RELOCATE;D • AND UTILITIES REC. NO. 7208100354 EX. 15' PUBLIC WATER EASEMENT ' \ i< . ' _ .......... +-. :/--f' -,, I l 1 i ~ .. WM .. T ; ,;( r-.. i I<•·< 1-1 EX. WM // \ i .. · .·. I ! l I I I CONSTRUCTiON SIGN INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ,/ ).I )_ i 1 "' 1,···' i SHEET DETAIL, ·SHEET 5 CATCH BASIN PROTE:Cn N. >re. /:. ·11 ] ;Y Ek. DR!VEWA y . . ,. SEE DETAIL, SHEET 5 i i\"' ·. ;v [ .. IEX TR (TYP} : > 1 1 ·.· ·1·· .· r ·1 •• ,;,Ex EJB CONSTRUCT AND 'MAINTAIN ' ·•···• •· I '1-'"Ex.' 'f1r -......................... -· ····· .· .. · .· .. · .. · ·· · · · · · · . "I .. ·. ·.·. ·. I I CLEAR LIMITS AND 15 x 100 MIN. TABIUZED '.: · "' · I·· c::i : -""'"'-"''-'='=<""-'"'-""-,..,,~./ CONSTRUCnON EN~N.Ce,111 <"' i I JI JI I :. FENCE (TYP) .... ,~t 1· I , I i rr::11c:r c· i -·>>f· ·>/··.-.l j G:P£1V !5PACC SA WCUT UN£ I J < f j ... , .. ~ ·-· -~ ... rc_:~~- REMOVE: TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC t 1 1-.. -·1 .. <t CB 15 AND INSTALL CURB, GUTTER AND lij···-,H I SIDEWALK. COORDINATE:DRIVE:WA..l'.'._-1 I I I I 11·-12· 0 2.09% LOCA nONS WITH HOME OWNERS. •lj I ;';' I ! ( CB 16 )- 1 VJ th /.7l ! ii i 1 1 I I 21·-12· o 2.33:r ; I I : -®fl :_::tx. i!J'' SD :..::= =-:..:: ro\'1~~;?C;~~:v. i~T~ ,r1i~;io;~;~;~iggijf~ .. :, I (f.) [ I CB 17 I llJ I i I I ~111 I I "'( I : i ;:;,J , · "1]:L ....... >~~.-~.me,.-; ,;J !~ ' : I.O"' + I '1:1' ,.., EX. CULVERT m BE PLUGGED AND ABANDONED AT If. 24'-12· 0 8.33% ..... ADVERSE SLOP£ SEDIMENT RISER N 509783.86 £ 1644109.12 12" IE 440.50 SEE DETAIL, SHEET 5 , SILT FENCE ... J-, -f-" ·--........ -....... TYP-......... _ ... I EX. PR/VA TE Uf/LITY EASEMENT FOR OVER HEAD POWER, TELEPHONE AND CABLE LINES TO BENEFIT THE ADJACENT PROPERTY LiJ EX. 6' HIGH (f.) · BOARD FENCE 1--~x;;,iff/l,gir;:Afoa ---~'t ::# i DETERMINE IF WALL ~ i I REBUILD IS REQUIRED O' ! ' · .. . EX. CB EXISTING SIGN TO BE RELOCA T, --/ ""' l ,/tj EX. DI TCN ~ e POND BOTTOM i CELL 2 -439.5 I TOP 450.0 TOE 449.5 ·5 I TOP 1457.2 5 2 TOE1452.0 · 6' TALL CHAIN LINi< FENCE W: GREEN VINYL COA nNG PER WSDOT STD. PLAN L-2 TYPE 1 OR TYPE 3 /, 01'"\N I"·',,.... /. J/H. . \'.t.:11· 1 ·" Ll··\l .... L 1 '"11 ! ·z,·,,, J""'/e\ GM -,7 V\, ",' ; ) . ,, " ,., ..... l'j' .. ,,."' ! ""'-''-'' M I OUTFALL LOT 10 IRocKERY DRAIN N 509691.13 E 1644220.81 I LEGEND GRADING AND TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTA noN CONTROL --BOUNDARY = ROCKERY ..................................... LOT LIN£ I ! D CUT SLOPES ---......... RIGHT-OF-WAY j j D FILL SLOPES GUTTER, FLOW, & CURB LINE CENTER LIN£ ~ R!PRAP - EASEMENT ::zrr.;: CURB RAMP -------BUILDING SETBACK LIN£ (BSBL} ~ STREET LIGHT STORM DRAIN PIPE -------------ROCKERY DRAIN t, ROCK CHECK DAM .. ·300 .. ······· ................ 10' EX!SnNG CONTOURS § STRAW BALES · --·302· · ----........ 2' EX/SnNG CONTOURS ---420---------10' PROPOSED CONWURS ~ OVERFLOW STRUCTURE ---422---------2' PROPOSED CONTOURS fill CA TCN BASIN, TYPE I FENCE (lif• j CATCH BASIN, TYPE II ... SWALE OR DITCH 0 STORM CLEANOUT ---------TOP OF 40% SLOPE -, -· -• -EDGE OF WETLAND ® YARD DRAIN •••••••••••••••• I ••• BUFFER LINE bo TEMPORARY STAND PIPE . • • • • FILTER FENCE e -II II II-DA YI../GHT LINE INTERIM CATCH BASIN PROTECnON I CLEARING ! LIMITS OF CLEARING kEl -R!PRAP ••• TEMPORARY INTERCEPTOR SWALE TEMPORARY INTERCEPTOR CUL VERT 6" IE 440.50 W/ 1' THICK x 6' WIDE x 8' LONG RIPRAP PAD KING COUNTY CODE 16.82.100 F. G. THE DUFF LA YER AND NA nVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE RETAINED IN AN UNDISTURBED STA rr: I TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACnCABLE. ANY DUFF LA YER OR TOPSOIL REMOVED ill DURING GRADING SHALL BE STOCKPILED ON-SITE: IN A DES/GNA TED, CONTROLLED AREA 11 NOT ADJACENT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES AND CRlnCAL AREAS. THE MA TE:RIAL SHALL BE i1 REAPPUED TO OTHER PORnONS OF THE SITE: WI-IERE FEASIBL£ ~ )/1 ti 1. EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN SUBSEcnoN G.2 OF THIS SECnON, AREAS THAT ;• HA VE: BEEN CLEARED AND GRADED SHALL HA VE: TH£ SOIL MOISTURE HOLDING CAPACITY RESTORED TO THAT OF TH£ ORIGINAL UNDISTURBED SOIL NA nVE: TO THE SITE: TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACnCABL£ THE SOIL IN ANY AREA THAT HAS BEEN COMPACTED OR THAT HAS HAD SOME OR ALL OF THE DUFF LA YER OR UNDERLYING TOPSOIL REMOVED SHALL 8£ AMENDED TO MlnGA TE: FOR LOST MOISTURE HOLDING CAPACITY. THE AMENDMENT SHALL TAKE PLACE BETWEEN MAY 1 AND OCTOBER 1. REPLACED TOPSOIL SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF EIGHT INCHES THICK, UNLESS THE APPLICANT DEMONSTRATES THAT A DIFFERENT THICKNESS WILL PROVIDE COND!nONS EQUIVALENT TO THE SOIL MOISTURE HOLDING CAPACITY NA nVE: TO THE SIT£. REPLACED TOPSOIL SHALL HA VE: AN ORGANIC MA TTE:R CONTENT OF BETWEEN EIGHT TO THIRTEEN PERCENT DRY WEIGHT AND A PH SUITABLE FOR THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLANTS. 2. THIS SUBSECnON DOES NOT APPLY TO AREAS THAT: A. ARE SUBJECT TO A STA TE: SURFACE MINE RECLAMA noN PERMIT; OR 8. AT PROJECT COMPLEnON ARE COVERED BY AN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, INCORPORATED INTO A DRAINAGE FACIUTY OR ENGINEERED AS STRUCTURAL FILL OR SLOPE. I I TOP 458.8 TOE 456.1 I I TOP 459.5 1 TO£ 458.5 ••·-o->o, RELOCATE: EXISnNG FENCE TO PROPERTY LINE I SCALE: 1" = 40' \ ' . \ CSWPP NOTES; ALL POLLUTANTS, INCLUDING WASlE MATERIALS AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS, THAT OCCUR ONS!TE SHALL BE HANDLED AND DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE CQNTAMINA noN OF STORM WATER. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING AND PREVENTA 77VE MEASURES WILL BE TAKEN TO ENSURE THAT THE SITE WILL 8£ KEPT CLEAN, WELL ORGANIZED, AND FREE OF DEBRIS. NO POLLU770N PRODUCTS ARE TO BE STORED ON TH£ SITE UNLESS A PLAN IS SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY KING COUNTY DOES. A DETAILED LIST OF PERSONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO KING COUNTY ODES PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUC710N AC77VITY ON THE SITE INCLUDING THE TESC SUPERVISOR AND PERSONNEL RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROPER REFUELING OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND CONTAINING ANY CONCRETE WASHOUT FACILITY. PORTABLE SAN/TA T!ON FAC!Ll77ES WILL BE FIRMLY SECURED, REGULARLY MAINTAINED, AND EMPTIED WHEN NECESSARY. SOLID WASTE WILL BE STORED IN SECURE, CLEARLY MARKED CONTAINERS. NO CONSTRUCnoN OR SITE: DISTURBANCE FOR THIS PROJECT MAY BEGIN BEFORE THE APPLICANT FIRST OBTAINS A GENERAL PERMIT TO DISCHARGE STORM WA TE:R ASSOC/A TED WITH CONSTRUCnON ACnVITY PERMIT FROM TH£ WASHINGTON STA TE: DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY. PROVIDE ACCESS DURING CONSTRUCnON TO LOCAL TRAFFIC/ EXISnNG DRIVE:WA 'l'S. THERE SHALL BE NO DIRECT VEHICULAR ACCESS BETWEEN THIS PLAT AND 148TH A VENUE SE EXCEPT FOR THE EXISnNG DRIVE:WA Y THAT SERVES THE ABUmNG PROPERTY FROM THE 15' WIDE "PANNANOLE" TRACT. SITE: PREPARA noN, FILL, EXCA VA noN AND COMPACnON RECOMMENDA noNS ARE LOCATED IN THE GEOTE:CHNICAL £NG/NEERING REPORT BY ASSOC/A TED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. DA TED 1 /27 /05 ALL CATCH BASINS TO BE TYPE I UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. ALL CATCH BASINS TO HA VE: ROLLED VANED GRATES UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. CATCH BASINS HA VE: BEEN SIZED TO MEET CURRENT KING COUNTY AND WSOOT KNOCKOUT REQUIREMENTS USING ADS N-12 PIP£ CONTRACTOR MAY WORK DIRECTLY WITH CATCH BASIN MANUFACTURER TO REDUCE CATCH BASIN SIZES PROVIDED KNOCKOUT REQUIREMENTS ARE snLL MET. CATCH BASIN LOCATION AND ELEVA T/ON TABLE :i -----~--------''! CB 1, TYPE 11-48" W/ SOLID LOCKING LID 2+55.00, 32.00' RT (RD A) TOP 453.00 12" IE 446.35 CB 6 2+15.10, 14.22' RT W/ 81-DIRECnONAL VANED GRATE: TOP 451.91 12" IE 448.54 CB 7 2+15.10, 14.22' LT W/ 81-DIRECnONAL VANED GRATE: TOP 451.91 6" IE 449.32 12" IE 448.82 CB 15, TYPE 11-54" W/ SOUD LOCKING LID N 509807.67 E 1644105.85 TOP 450.50 12" IE 442.50 CB 16, TYPE 11-48" W/ OVERFLOW STRUCTURE SEE DETAIL, SHEET 10 N 509803.18 E 1644097.12 TOP 448.00 12· 1£ 442.27 CB 17, TYPE 11-48" W/ SOUD LOCKING LID N 509789.85 E 1644081.03 TOP 450.00 12" IE 441. 78 15" IE 441.53 (CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY 15" /£) I ® ll CAU710N :'I LOCA noN OF EXISnNG ununES SHOWN IS APPROX/MA TE: ''% ir{ AND MAY NOT BE ACCURATE: OR ALL INCLUSIVE. IT IS THE ,, CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VERIFY LOCA nON !o! Hl OF ununES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCnON. ,i,."I YOU MUST CALL 1-800-424-5555 NOT LESS THAN TWO ,I FULL BUSINESS DA }'S BEFORE BEGINNING EXCA VA noN W/-IERE I ANY UNDERGROUND unLlnES MAY BE LOCATED. FAILURE TO i1': DO SO COULD MEAN BEARING SUBSTANnAL REPAIR COSTS. i'! KING .COUN~D.D.E.S. a<.u,)'."' ~ JAMES H. SANDERS, P .E. DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER Comments: <f·/l·OI Completion Date t!d[;tloata Approval Dote ,.,_, i'"i ,·;u..4 © 2006 TRIAD ASSOCIATES \. T D ASSOCIATES 12112115thAve. NE Kirkland, WA 98034-6929 425.821.8448 425.821.3481 fax 800.488.0756 toll free www.triadassoc.com Land Dev~lopment Cons~1llanlS ).... ..... <: .... m q: ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 (f.) C) C ~ bi:l ~ s ~ ~ ,q: .... ~ (f.) ~ ~ Cl :e : ~ ~ GERALD F. BUCK, A!CP PROJECT MANAGER NICK A. YINGER, PLS PROJECT SURVEYOR RICHARD A. TOMKINS. PE: PROJECT ENGINEER MEI-SH/OU UN, ASLA PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FIRST SUBMITI'AL DATE: 2/16/07 SCALE: BOJUZ.: 1"=40' mn:.:N/A STAMP NOT V A1ID UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED JOB NO. 04-257 SHEET NO. 4oF12 SE 1/4, SE 1/4, SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23N., RANGE 5E., W.M. 2"x2" BY 14 Ga. WIRE OR EQUIVALENT, IF STANDARD STRENGTH FABRIC USED FILTER FABRIC -----1:1 MIN. 4"x4" TRENCH -- BACKFILL TRENCH WITH NATIVE SOIL OR 3 4 -1.5 WASHED GRAVEL JOINTS IN Fil TER FABRIC SHALL BE SPLICED AT POSTS. USE STAPLES. WIRE RINGS OR EQUIVALENT TO ATTACH FABRIC TO POSTS 2' MIN. POSTS 12" MIN. 2"x2" BY 14 Ga. WIRE OR EQUIVALENT, IF STANDARD STRENGTH FABRIC USED ,'.','.' . ::::::::::::::::::::::.,. -........ ' ................... " :.·.·.·:.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·:.·.·.·.·.·. 2 , M''N . ·::.1:1·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·:.·.·:.·.1·1: f, • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ' ................................. . ' ................ ' ............ " .. •·•······11·····•·•·•·•·•···•·•·•·····•·•·•···•·•·•···· .. •r1··•·•···· ~,,. 12' MIN. CROSS SECTION 2"x4" WOOD POSTS STEEL FENCE POSTS REBAR OR EQUIVALENT. POST SPACING MAY BE INCREASED TO 8' IF WIRE BACKING IS USED MAINTENANCE STANDARDS 1. ANY DAMAGE SHALL BE REPAIRED IMMEOIA TEL Y. NOTE: FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR WHENEVER POSSIBLE. 2. IF CONCENTRA TEO FLOWS ARE EVIDENT UPHILL OF THE FENCES, THEY MUST BE INTERCEPTED ANO CONVEYED TO A SEDIMENT TRAP OR PONO. 3. IT IS IMPORTANT TO CHECK THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE FENCE FOR SIGNS OF THE FENCE CLOGGING ANO ACTING AS A BARRIER TO FLOW ANO THEN CAUSING CHANNELIZATION OF FLOWS PARALLEL TO THE FENCE. IF THIS OCCURS. REPLACE THE FENCE ANO/OR REMOVE THE TRAPPED SEDIMENT. 4. SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED WHEN THE SEDIMENT IS 6" HIGH. 5. IF THE FILTER FABRIC HAS DETERIORATED DUE TO ULTRA VIOLET BREAKDOWN, IT SHALL BE REPLACED. 6. WHERE THE SILT FENCE BORDERS WETLANDS AREAS. BRIGHT ORANGE FENCING (BEL TON INDUSTRIES STYLE 803, OR EQUIVALENT) SHALL BE USED. u (FIGURE D.4.E OF THE 2005 KCSWDM) SILT FENCE DETAIL <® NOTICE OF PROPOSED NOT TO SCALE N071CE BOARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIF/CA VONS: E T THE NOTICE BOARD SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH 4'x4'x1/2" PLYWOOD, EXTERIOR GRADE, GOOD SURFACE ONE SIDE. PROFESSIONALLY PREPARED PLASTIC BOARD OVERLAYS, PERMANENTLY AmXEO TO THE BOARD ARE PERMISSIBLE. THE NOTICE BOARD SHALL 0/SPLA Y TH /NFORMA TION AS SHOWN IN THE FIGURE AND AS SPECIFIED AT THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING. NOTICE BOARDS MAY BE REUSED BU THEY MUST BE CLEAN AND SHOW NO EVIDENCE OF FORMER WORDING. CAPITAL AND LOWERCASE LETTERS. 1. LETTERING STYLE: HEL VET/CA OR SIMILAR STANDARD TYPEFACE 2. LETTERING SIZE: OULD TITLE SHOULD BE J" CAPITAL LETTERS (NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCT/ON ACTIVITY). OTHER LETTERS SH BE 2" LETTERS AND THE 'EMERGENCY TEXT AND PHONE MAY BE 1-1/2" LETTERS. SEE ILLUSTRATION FOR USE OF CAPITAL AND LOWERCASE LETTERS. 3. LETTERING: BLACK (PERMANENT OR SILK-SCREEN) 4. BACKGROUND COLOR: WHITE 5. LOGO: KING COUNTY EMBLEM, IN BLACK UNO; 4• THE APPLICANT/DEVELOPER SHALL ERECT THE NOTICE BOARD BY SOLIDLY SEmNG TWO 4"x4" POSTS 12 TO 24 INCHES INTO THE GRO OR STRUCTURALLY ATTACHING IT TO AN EXISTING BU/WING. POST LENGTH SHALL BE AT LEAST 7 FEET ABOVE THE GROUND. TWO 2"x DIAGONAL BRACES SHOULD BE NAILED TO THE INS/OE BACK OF THE POSTS AND STAKED AT THE GROUND TO PROVIDE STABILITY AGAI NST WINO OR SOFT SOIL CONDITIONS IF POSTS ARE LESS THAN 24 INCHES INTO THE GROUND. THE NOTICE BOARD SHALL BE ATTA Cr/ED TO THE POSTS WITH FOUR LAG BOLTS AND WASHERS (J/8-INCH DIAMETER AND J" LONG). N071CE BOARD LQCA TION: THE NOTICE BOARD SHALL BE LOCA TEO: • AT THE MIDPOINT ON THE SITE STREET FRONTAGE OR AS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY ODES STAFF TO MAXIMIZE VISIBILITY. • AT A LOCA T/ON 5 FEET INSIDE THE STREET PROPERTY LINE; A NOTICE BOARD STRUCTURALl Y A TTACHEO TO AN EXISTING BUILDING SHALL BE EXEMPT FROM SETBACK PROVISIONS, PROV/OW THAT THE NOTICE BOARD IS LOCA TEO NOT MORE THAN 5 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM DOES STAFF. ' ~ ' ~ ;,):$f,,C::::-. ~'«Y • SO THAT THE TOP OF THE NOTICE BOARD IS BETWEEN 7 TO 9 FEET ABOVE GRAD£ • SO THAT IT IS TOTALLY VISIBLE TO PEDESTRIANS. MAINTENANCE AND REMOVAL Of N071CE BOARD: TION THE APPLICANT/DEVELOPER SHALL MAINTAIN THE NOTICE BOARD IN GOOD CONDITION THROUGHOUT THE SITE IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUC PERIOD, WHICH SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE TIME OF FINAL CONSTRUCT/ON APPROVAL BY KING COUNTY ODES OR ITS SUCCESSOR OR JURISDICTION. THE NOTICE BOARD SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER FINAL CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL. EARLY REMOVAL OF THE NOTICE BOA MAY RESULT IN ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS AUTHORIZED UNDER KING COUNTY CODE, TITLE 23 ANO MAY DELAY FINAL CONSTRUCT/ON APPROVAL. RD • ,.. "' CONSTRUCTION King County ACTIVITY 011p11rtment of O.velopment & Environmental Services 900 Ooksdole Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Type of Action: Site Development Project No: L05P0019 Description: Subdivision Construcl ion Projected completion Dote: 12/31/11 Hours of Construction: 7am-10pm King County; s Contact: TIM CHEATUM Phone Number: 206-296-7232 Developer,; Conrod: SARA SLATIEN Phone Number: 425-625-1955 TESC Supervisor: MONTE DUNN Phone Number: 425-625-1955 After Elsuiness hour':; for En11ironmentol Saftety Related Emergencies: 1-888-437-4711 It )IOIJ ,..,q,Jlrt thla motorlo Tn a...,m., a,Olo oooso\lo, ~, lo,go print, ploooe odll 206-296-000C ("°k:•) or 10, th, h1orlog lmpor~. 205-296-7217 {ITY}. 48" 1/( "' '>~~~'0 ~. /,A/)-':;/;' " . ;<0,%:,//. ~'2!0 . ,"\,: ' ' '«.0;; «<'w UI NOTICE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SIGN 4' SWALE FLOWI.INE 4' NOT TO SCALE NQTF; 10· STEEL FENCE POSTS TENSAR GS-1 SAFETY FENCE (BRIGHT ORANGE} OR EQUAL. GALVANIZED WIRE NOTF:: 1. CLIP FENCE TO GAL V. WIRE 2. WIRE FENCE TO STEEL FENCE POST 00 NOT ATTACH TO TREES OR OTHER NATIVE VEGETATION ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCE f.>1.A' ~' NOT TO SCALE FILTER FENCE NOTES 1. THE FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PURCHASED IN A CONTINUOUS ROLL CUT TO THE LENGTH OF THE BARRIER TO A VOID USE OF JOINTS. WHEN JOINTS ARE NECESSARY, FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE SPLICED TOGETHER ONLY AT A SUPPORT POST WITH A MINIMUM 6-INCH OVERLAP ANO BOTH ENOS SECURELY FASTENED TO THE POST. 2. THE FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED TO FOLLOW THE CONTOURS (WHERE FEASIBLE). THE FENCE POSTS SHALL BE SPACED AT A MAXIMUM OF 6 FEET APART ANO OR/VEN SECURELY INTO THE GROUND (MINIMUM OF 30 INCHES). 3. A TRENCH SHALL BE EXCAVA TEO, ROUGr/L Y 8 INCHES WIDE ANO 12 INCHES DEEP, UPSLOPE ANO ADJACENT TO THE WOOD POST TO ALLOW THE FILTER FABRIC TO BE BURIED. 4. WHEN STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC IS USED, A WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE SHALL BE FASTENED SECURELY TO THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF THE POSTS USING HEAVY-DUTY WIRE STAPLES AT LEAST 1 INCH LONG, TIE WIRES OR HOG RINGS. THE WIRE SHALL EXTEND INTO THE TRENCH A MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES ANO SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 36 INCHES ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE. 5. THE STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABi?IC SHALL BE STAPLED OR WIRED TO THE FENCE, ANO 20 INCHES OF THE FABRIC SHALL BE EXTENDED INTO THE TRENCH, THE FABRIC SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 36 INCHES ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE. FILTER FABRIC SHALL NOT BE STAPLED TO EXISTING TREES. 6. WHEN EXTRA STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC AND CLOSER POST SPACING ARE USED, THE WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE MAY BE EL/MINA TEO. IN SUCH A CASE, THE FILTER FABRIC IS STAPLED OR WIRED DIRECTLY TO THE POSTS WITH ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF STANDARD NOTE 5 APPL YING. 7. THE TRENCH SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH 3/4-/NCH MINIMUM DIAMETER WASHED GRAVEL. 8. FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HA VE SERVED THEIR USEFUL PURPOSE BUT NOT BEFORE THE UPSLOPE AREA HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 9. FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEOIA TELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL ANO AT LEAST DAIL y OUR/NG PROLON,;Eo RAINFALL. ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEOIA TEL Y. SOLID WALLS FILTER MEO/A FOR OEWA TERING CATCH BASIN-...J GRATE OVERFLOW POROUS BOTTOM •• ' ' . NOTE: THIS DETAIL IS ONLY SCHEMA TIC. ANY INSERT IS ALLOWED THAT HAS A MIN. 0.5 C.F. OF STORAGE. THE MEANS TO OEWA TER THE STORED SEDIMENT. AN OVERFLOW, ANO CAN BE EASILY MAINTAINED. CATCH BA SIN SILTATION CONTROL INSERT NOT TO SCALE TEMPORARY ERQSION/SEDIMENTAUON CONTROL NOTES 1. APPROVAL OF THIS EROSION ANO SEO/MEN TA TION CONTROL (ESC} PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF PERMANENT ROAD OR DRAINAGE DESIGN (E.G. SIZE ANO LOCATION OF ROADS, PIPES, RESTRICTORS, CHANNELS, RETENTION FACILITIES. UTILITIES. ETC.) 2. THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE ESC PLANS AND THE CONSTRUCT/ON, MAINTENANCE, REPLACEMENT, AND UPGRADING OF THESE ESC FACILITIES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT/ESC SUPERVISOR UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCT/ON IS APPROVED. 3. THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CLEARING LIMITS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHALL BE CLEARLY FLAGGED BY SURVEY TAPE OR FENCING, IF REQUIRED, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCT/ON {SWOM APPENDIX O}. OUR/NG THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, NO DISTURBANCE BEYOND THE CLEARING LIMITS SHALL BE PERMITTED. THE CLEARING LIMITS SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE APPLICANT/ESC SUPERVISOR FOR THE DURA T/ON OF CONSTRUCTION. 4. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION ANO MAINTAINED FOR THEOURAT/ON OF THE PROJECT. ADDITIONAL MEASURES, SUCH AS CONSTRUCTED WHEEL WASH SYSTEMS OR WASH PADS. MAYBE REQUIRED TO ENSURE THAT ALL PA VEO AREAS ARE KEPT CLEAN ANO TRACK OUT TO ROAD RIGHT OF WAY DOES NOT OCCUR FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. 5. THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN MUST BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO OR IN CONJUNCT/ON WITH ALL CLEARING ANO GRADING SO AS TO ENSURE THAT THE TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT TO SURFACE WATERS, DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. ANO ADJACENT PROPERTIES IS MINIMIZED. 6. THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ANTIC/PA TEO SITE CONDITIONS. OUR/NG THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, THESE ESC FACILITIES SHALL BE UPGRADED AS NEEDED FOR UNEXPECTED STORM EVENTS ANO MODIFIED TO ACCOUNT FOR CHANGING SITE CONDITIONS (E.G. ADDITIONAL COVER MEASURES, ADDITIONAL SUMP PUMPS, RELOCATION OF DITCHES ANO SILT FENCES, PERIMETER PROTECTION ETC.). 7. THE ESC FACILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE APPLICANT/ESC SUPERVISOR ANO MAINTAINED TO ENSURE CONTINUED PROPER FUNCTIONING. WRITTEN RECORDS SHALL BE KEPT OF WEEKLY REVIEWS OF THE ESC FACILITIES. 8. ANY AREAS OF EXPOSED SOILS, INCLUDING ROADWAY EMBANKMENTS, THAT WILL NOT BE DISTURBED FOR TWO DAYS OUR/NG THE WET SEASON OR SEVEN DAYS DURING THE ORY SEASON SHALL BE IMMEOIA TEL Y STABILIZED WITH THE APPROVED ESC COVER METHODS {E.G., SEEDING, MULCHING, PLASTIC COVERING, ETC.). 9. ANY AREA NEEDING ESC MEASURES, NOT REQUIRING IMMEOIA TE ATTENTION, SHALL BE ADDRESSED WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS. 10. THE ESC FACILITIES ON INACTIVE SITES SHALL BE INSPECTED ANO MAINTAINED A MINIMUM OF ONCE A MONTH OR WITHIN 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A STORM EVENT. 11. AT NO TIME SHALL MORE THAN ONE (1) FOOT OF SEDIMENT BE ALLOWED TO ACCUMULATE WITHIN A CATCH BASIN. ALL CATCH BASINS ANO CONVEYANCE LINES SHALL BE CLEANED PRIOR TO PAVING. THE CLEANING OPERATION SHALL NOT FLUSH SEOIMENT-LAOEN WATER INTO THE DOWNSTREAM SYSTEM. 12. ANY PERMANENT RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITY USED AS A TEMPORARY SEffi/NG BASIN SHALL BE MODIFIED WITH THE NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ANO SHALL PROV/OE AOEOUA TE STORAGE CAPACITY. IF THE PERMANENT FACILITY IS TO FUNCTION ULTIMATELY AS AN INFILTRATION SYSTEM, THE TEMPORARY FACILITY MUST BE ROUGH GRADED SO THAT THE BOTTOM ANO SIDES ARE AT LEAST THREE FEET ABOVE THE FINAL GRADE OF THE PERMANENT FACILITY. 13. COVER MEASURES WILL BE APPLIED IN CONFORMANCE WITH APPENDIX O OF THE SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL. 14. PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF THE WET SEASON (OCT. 1), ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE REVIEWED TO IDENTIFY WHICH ONES CAN BE SEEDED IN PREPARA T/ON FOR THE WINTER RAINS. DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED WITHIN ONE WEEK OF THE BEGINNING OF THE WET SEASON. A SKETCH MAP OF THOSE AREAS TO BE SEEDED ANO THOSE AREAS TO REMAIN UNCOVERED SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DOES INSPECTOR FOR REVIEW. STRUCTURAL NOTES 1. THESE PLANS ARE APPROVED FOR STANDARD ROAD ANO DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ONLY. PLANS FOR STRUCTURES SUCH AS BRIDGES, VAULTS. ANO RETAINING WALLS REQUIRE A SEPARATE REVIEW ANO APPROVAL BY DOES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION (KCC 16.04. 16.70, 14.20). 2. ROCKER/ES ARE CONSIDERED TO BE A METHOD OF BANK STAB/LIZA TION ANO EROSION CONTROL. ROCKER/ES SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED TO SERVE AS RETAINING WALLS. ALL ROCKER/ES IN COUNTY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH KCRS. ROCKER/ES OUTS/OE OF ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNATIONAL BU/LO/NG CODE. r 0 = 0 2' ! 1.5' RIP-RAP SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9-13.1 OF THE W.S.0.0. T./A.P. W.A, STANDARD SPECIF/CATIONS. RIP-RAP SHALL BE REASONABLY WELL GRADED WITH ROCK GRAOA TION AS FOLLOWS: 100% PASSING 8-INCH SQUARE SIEVE 40%-60% PASSING 6-INGE SQUARE SIEVE 0--10% PASSING 2-INCE SQUARE SIEVE ( POLYETHYLENE CAP ( PROV/OE AOEQUA TE STRAPPING ~-446.0 AS PER KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS, ORIVEWA YS SHALL BE PAVED TO THE EDGE OF R-0-W PRIOR TO INSTALLATION KEY ROCK INTO SWALE 0.25 MIN. SWALE CROSS SECTION@ ROCK CHECK DAM Y. 0;,;,-; /1 /j /1, ;,'; l"A KEY ROCK INTO SWALE MIN. 0.25' DITCH SLOPE 0 -5% 5 -10% >10% CHECK DAM SPACING 150' 100' 50' 5' NOTE: ROCK SHALL BE 4" MINUS SUMP BEHIND ROCK CHECK OAM QUARRY ROCK. SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY &: CLEANED WI/EN COLLECTED DEBRIS EXCEEDS 1/2 OF ITS DEPTH. R p DRAINAGE TUBING. 12" TUBING SHALL COMPLY WI TH ASTM F667 ANO AASHTO M294. 4-9 16" DIAMETER OEWA TERING ORIFICE, SCHEDULE 40 STEEL STUB ALTERNATIVE.LY. M£TAL STAKES ANO WIRE MA Y BE USED TO PREVENT FLOTA T/ON MAINTENANCE STANDARDS • 24• CORRUGATED METAL RISER WATERTIGHT 5.5' MIN. COUPLING TACK WELD L 6'M/N. 'I --f -~8" MIN. CONCRETE BASE 2x RISER DIA. MIN. 440.50 I. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE POND WHEN IT REACHES 1 FOOT IN DEPTH. INSTALL ORIVEWA Y CUL VERT IF THERE IS A ROADS/OE DITCH PRESENT, AS PER KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS 12" MIN. THICKNESS 4 "-8' QUARRY SPALLS PLACE AT FUTURE SUBGRAOE ELEVA T/ON IF POSSIBLE OF THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO A V0/0 DAMAGING OF THE ROAOWA Y. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE ENTRANCE BE CROWNED SO THAT RUNOFF ORA/NS OFF THE PAO. "..Oo· -01( UNOERLA Y WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PROV/OE FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS GRESS AREA S££DING NOTES 1. SEEDBED PREPARATION MAY INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: A. IF INFER TILE OR COARSE TEXTURED SUBSOIL WILL BE EXPOSED OUR/NG GRADING, STOCKPILE TOPSOIL ANO RESPREAO IT OVER THE FINISHED SLOPE ANO ROLL IT TO PROV/OE A FIRM BASE. 8. IF CONSTRUCTION FILLS HA VE LEFT SOIL EXPOSED WITH A LOOSE, ROUGH OR IRREGULAR SURFACE, TRACK WALK UP SLOPE. C. IF CUTS OR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT HA VE LEFT A TIGHTLY COMPACTED SURFACE, BREAK WITH CHISEL PLOW OR OTHER SUITABLE EQUIPMENT. PERFORM ALL CUL TUR AL OPERA T/ONS ACROSS OR AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE SLOPES (CONTOURED). THE SEEDBED SHOULD BE FIRM WITH A FAIRLY FINE SURFACE AFTER ROUGHENING . 2. FERTILIZA T/ON -AS PER SUPPLIER'S RECOMMENOA T/ONS. DEVELOPMENTS ADJACENT TO WATER BODIES MUST USE NONPHOSPHOROUS FERTILIZER. 3. HYDROSEEOING APPL/CATIONS WITH APPROVED SEED-MULCH-FERTILIZER MIXTURES MA Y ALSO BE USED. 4. SEEDING -APPLY APPROPRIATE MIXTURE TO THE PREPARED SEEDBED AT A RA TE OF 120 LBS/ACRE. COVER THE SEED WITH TOPSOIL OR MULCH NO DEEPER THAN ONE -HALF INCH. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEED MIX CHEWINGS OR RED FESCUE ANNUAL OR PERENNIAL RYE REOTOP OR COLONIAL BENTGRASS WHITE DUTCH CLOVER PROPORTIONS PERCENT PERCENT BY WEIGHT PURITY GERM/NAT/ON 40% 40% 10% 10% 98 98 92 98 90 90 85 90 RECOMMENDED CONSTRUCllON SEQUENCE 1. PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING. 2. FLAG OR FENCE CLEARING LIMITS. 3. POST NOTICE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SIGN WITH NAME ANO PHONE NUMBER OF ESC SUPERVISOR. 4. INSTALL CATCH BASIN PROTECTION IF REQUIRED. 5. GRADE ANO INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S). 6. INSTALL PERIMETER PROTECTION (SILT FENCE, BRUSH BARRIER, ETC.). 7. CONSTRUCT SEDIMENT PONDS. 8. GRADE ANO STABILIZE CONSTRUCT/ON ROADS. 9. CONSTRUCT SURFACE WATER CONTROLS (INTERCEPTOR DIKES. PIPE SLOPE DRAINS. ETC.)SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH CLEARING ANO GRADING FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. 10. MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH KING COUNTY STANDARDS ANO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENOA T/ONS. 11. RELOCATE SURFACE WATER CONTROLS ANO EROSION CONTROL MEASURES OR INSTALL NEW MEASURES SO THAT AS SITE CONDITIONS CHANGE THE EROSION ANO SEDIMENT CONTROL IS ALWAYS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE KING COUNTY EROSION ANO SEDIMENT CONTROL STANDARDS. 12. COVER ALL AREAS THAT WILL BE UNWORKEO FOR MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS OUR/NG THE ORY SEASON OR TWO DAYS OUR/NG THE WET SEASON WITH STRAW. WOOD FIBER MULCH, COMPOST, PLASTIC SHEETING OR EQUIVALENT. 13. STABILIZE ALL AREAS THAT REACH FINAL GRADE WITHIN SEVEN DAYS. 14. SEED OR 500 ANY AREAS TO REMAIN UNWORKEO FOR MORE THAN 30 DAYS. 15. UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. ALL DISTURBED AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED ANO BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES REMOVED IF APPROPRIATE. GRADING NOTES 1) ALL FILLS LOCA TEO WITHIN THE BU/LO/NG ENVELOPE SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 90 PERCENT OF MAXIMUM DENSITY PER U.8.C. 3313.4. OR AS OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY THE GEOTECHN/CAL CONSULTANT TO BE CERTIFIED AS "ENGINEERED, STRUCTURAL FILL SUITABLE FOR CONVENTIONAL . FOUNOA T/ONS ANO HAVING AOEQUA TE BEARING CAPACITY FOR RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES". Jtf:T SEASON SPECIAL PROVISIONS ' 2.: J. 4.' 5.\ B.\ THE ALLOWED TIME Tl/AT A DISTURBED AREA MAY REMAIN UNWORKOEO WITHOUT COVER MEASURE IS REDUCED TO TWO CONSECUTIVE WORKING DA Y.5, RA Tl/ER THAN SEVEN. STOCKPILES ANO STEEP CUT ANO FILL SLOPES ARE TO BE PROTECTED IF UNWORKEO FOR MORE THAN 12 HOURS. COVER MATERIALS SUFFICIENT TO COVER ALL 0/STURBEO AREAS SHALL BE STOCKPILED ON SITE. ALL AREAS THAT ARE TO BE UNWORKED OUR/NG THE WET SEASON SHALL BE SEEDED WITHIN ONE WEEK O OF THE BEGINNING OF THE WET SEASON. MULCH IS REQUIRED TO PROTECT ALL SEEDED AREAS. FIFTY LINEAR FEET OF SILT FENCE (ANO THE NECESSARY STAKES) PER ACRE OF DISTURBANCE MUST BE STOCKPILED ON SITE. 7.' CONSTRUCT/ON ROAD ANO PARKING LOT STAB/LIZA T/ON ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL SITES UNLESS THE SITE IS UNDERLAIN BY COARSE-GRAINED SOIL. B.\ 9.\ 10. \ 11 ( SEDIMENT RETENTION IS REQUIRED UNLESS NO OFFS/TE DISCHARGE IS ANTIC/PA TEO FOR THE SPECIFIED DESIGN FLOW. SURFACE WATER CONTROLS ARE REQUIRED UNLESS NO OFFS/TE DISCHARGE IS ANTIC/PA TEO FOR THE SPECIFIED DESIGN FLOW. PHASING ANO MORE CONSERVATIVE BMP'S MUST BE EVALUA TEO FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY NEAR SURFACE WATERS. ANY RUNOFF GENERA TEO BY DEWA TERING MAY BE REQUIRED TO DISCHARGE TO THE SANITARY SEWER {WITH APPROPRIATE DISCHARGE AUTHORIZA T/ON), PORTABLE SAND FILTER SYSTEMS, OR HOLDING TANKS. 12. THE FREQUENCY OF MAINTENANCE REVIEW INCREASES FROM MONTHLY TO l WEEKLY. MAINTENANCE STANDARDS (FOR STABILIZED CONSTRUCUQN ENTRANCE) I 1. QI/ARRY SPALLS (OR HOG FUEL) SHALL BE ADDEO IF THE PAO IS NO LONGER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIF/CATIONS. ' 2. IF/ THE ENTRANCE IS NOT PREVENTING SEDIMENT FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO PAVEMENT, Tl/EN AL TERNA TE MEASURES TO KEEP THE STREETS FREE OF SEDIMENT SHALL BE USED. Tlj/S MAY INCLUDE STREET SWEEPING, AN INCREASE IN THE DIMENSIONS OF THE ENTRANCE, O(i' THE INSTALLATION OF A WHEEL WASH. IF WASHING IS USED. IT SHALL BE OONE ON AN A(i'EA COVERED WITH CRUSHED ROCK, ANO WASH WATER SHALL DRAIN TO A SEDIMENT 7VAP OR PONO. 3. A{'/Y SEDIMENT THAT IS TRACKED ONTO PAVEMENT SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY BY SiyEEPING. THE SEDIMENT COLLECTED BY SWEEPING SHALL BE REMOVED OR STABILIZED 01;1-SITE. THE PAVEMENT SHALL NOT BE CLEANED BY WASHING DOWN THE STREET, EXCEPT WI/EN SWEEPING IS INEFFECTIVE ANO THERE IS A Tl/REA T TO PUBLIC SAFETY. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO WASH THE STREETS, THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SMALL SUMP SHALL BE CONSIDERED. THE SEDIMENT WOULD THEN BE WASHED INTO THE SUMP. '\ 4. ANY ROCK SPALLS THAT ARE LOOSENED FROM THE PAD ANO ENO UP ON THE ROAD WAY SHALL BE REMOVED /MMEOIA TEL Y. 5. If; VEHICLES ARE ENTERING OR EXITING THE SITE AT POINTS OTHER THAN CONSTRUCT/ON ENTRANCE(S), FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED TO CONTROL TRAFFIC. ' • l I 4· IJ'· PJ' ROCK CHECK DAM CROSS SECTION INTERCEPTOR SWALE AND ROCK CHECK DAM DETAILS 2. ANY DAMAGE TO THE PONO EMBANKMENTS OR SLOPES SHALL BE REPAIRED. SEDIMENT RISER DETAIL (RGURE 0.4.G OF THE 2005 Kcswvt; STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE Completion Date NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE JAMES H. SANDERS, P.E. DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER Comments: Approval Dote © 2008 TRIAD ASSOCIA 1ES '\. T ASSOCIATES 12112115thAve.NE Kirkland, WA9B034-6929 425.821.8448 425.821.3481 fax 800.488.0756 toll free www.trladassoc.com ' . la 111d Dev e Io 11111 en t Cons u If.int~ Cl) ~ i,... ~ C ~ ~ i C q: ~ Cl) ~ ~ ::::! ~ i,... ~ Cl) ~ (.j ~ crj q: LJ..i 0 ....: ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " i;;; ~ ~ w ~ ~ 2 2 0 ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ! s ,., ......... ~ t$~~ s.~s i.:I ~ ~ ! ; ~ z s 0 e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ti! i1li s s. " s ci z GERALD F. BUCK, AICP PROJECT MANAGER NICK A. YINGER, PLS PROJECT SURVEYOR RICHARD A. TOMKINS. PE: PROJECT ENGINEER ME:I-SHIOU UN, ASLA PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FIRST SUBMITTAL DATE: 2/16 /0 7 SCALE: HORIZ.:N/A VEBT.:N/A EXPaRES: 8/4/e STAMP NOT VAIJD UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED JOB NO. 04-257 SHEET NO. 5oF12 'i ' i CB 13 W ROLLED VANED GRATE 1+37.46, 12.22' LT CEMENT CONCRETE ROLLED CURB (TYP) EX. CB TOP 447.34 /2" IE 442.81 (IN-£) 12" IE 442. 77 (IN-W) 12" IE 442.59 (OUT-S) EX. /8°-72" (FROM EX. CB TO CB 15) CB 14 W SOLID LOCKING LID 7+75.41, 13.96' RT INT 1+00 SE 125TH STREET = 1+14,.50 145TH f'LACE SE EX. 30' EASEMENT FOR INGRESS. EGR'css AND UTILITIES REC. NO. 72081003,!54 ... -' --~...,,,.-:::--t--,-==r-_.,,.,, EX. 15' PUBLIC WATER EASEMENT _ .................. F"'" Pl.Ar Or SHAMROCK ··········7-····· ' I I ' ' / EX. Pf1/VA TE UTILITY EASEMENT FOR OVER HEAD POWER, TELEPHONE AND CABLE LINES TO BENEFIT THE ADJACENT PROPERTY /6' EASEMENT AGREEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS REC. NO. 5284273 CB 18 0+62.30, 12.47 RT EX. CB TOP 454.86 6" IE 452,27 (DSGN) /2" IE 451.77 (DSGN) NEW TOP 454. 75 W/ SOLID LOCKING LIO NEW 20'-12" (N) (CONTRACTOR TO VE:RIFY 12" IE) CB 9 TYPE 11-48" / ··· -r+2~~~~5• :T IIJ- 8" D.I. SD IE 445.10 I EX. /0' WATER MAIN EASEMENT REC. NO. 200008/0000949 112· SD CE 444.57 EX. \ i LOW : ' I ;~~:OSED • ; I sTR:;n~J~~URfl •• ••••• J{ \ AND GUm.R .. : -: ::.:-_.-.::. -:-:.-.:.},._ ! ,,'i,..,., -·. \_ ~ ._CB 12 T/-IRU CURB PfJf!,=1+41.79 tr22•5.3•43• R=25. 46'.. (CTR STCR) R=25.61' (CTR GRATE) .. /6'-12· 0.1. ·,,,, 1+ 7..00, 14.22 RT \-~-:I J 13 ,,, 43·-12· CA EX. C/JL VERT 1 • rD EL. TO BE EMO VE:D P,. 52.0 CB 6 1 I \ \ ·-:;:____ SEE TESC P¥,N : \ II PUBLIC DRAINAGE : \ I;ASEMENT 5;, • I SE 1/4, SE 1/4, SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23N., RANGE 5E., W.M. INT 1+00 ROAD A -3+34.10 SE 125TH ST EX. CB TOP 454.77 72" IE 451.65 (DSGN} MA TCH EX/SI TNG SIDEWALK EX. CB TOP 454.89 72" IE 457.48 (N)j' 72" IE 451.47 (E) Pl.A1 Of' ' .. /2" IE 451.39 (W)j. · , , . 1,-;Ji I t ·.· . .I I · I I sHAMkocK I 15· EASEMENT Ac EEMENT 1 .1. 1 . !I n I t .... 1 1 i · · . · .. • CURB RAMP 1 1 '· FOR INGRESS AND, EGRESS 1 . i 1-:: ,.' · i · · · · CB I ' t ··I EX. ,, PER K.C. FIG. 3-01~. I REC. NO. 528427, / EX. YARD DR!l/N , I :'° I ,Ii,, I .·. o 1 i TYPE 2A (TYP) I I I I TO BE REMDVfD I •. · l,0tj ·L i i ' INSTALL NEIGHBOR 'ooo , Ex. EAs, MEN r 1 , I I :: '; ' 1,1'1) I · · · -~ DELIVE:RY AND COL ECT/ON EX. 10 WA ER MAIN EASEMENT, REC. NOi 8706030864 I EX. 70' w. TER MAIN EASEME. T / ,;. ;. I' . . ·. I . ox UNIT (NDCBU)I (16; REC. ND. , oooq5oaooo2os : EX. YARD DRAIN , , REC. NO. 20000508000205 I : ; ':'. : _ -. I <:: .,;I · ---, -"" :-""'c_-=~ _ _::_::c. _ ~ ':;.::· _; _!_ MIN.(TYP) _ _' T~rtff-~EM~VE:°, ' i REC. NO. ;20051122000044 , • , '>, '°&</ ~-/~ i1JJ1 .. -·(/ II Mfik.s.:a~ ~ss---__ ,.---------·--------------.. --··· -------· ..L----. L l L ·-. . "'"'· Aic. --,::.:£-I --qn -~ -~ $$~ --~ -S: r~~ --------"------, ""-""""'. --.. ~"' --·--.1 ~ , '" ' -f:dl!v./ Vrf'(I ~' ~ --::-c:-::· ·-::-,-··· -"-==--.,, --::. __ --::_ -=-='il ---'----::._so=SS--~-ai1s-=-=··-=ss==:::c:;~ss·· ----~7----s§ _ .. _~----=:=-:_-:-:_·::·---::--•,,--. -----f'~:. . ··-1-,I-·.:I -oL, -· ··/ . -"·-. --~~.;.~-... : . __ . _.:--~-----~-""~---~ -------~ -"~-=~-=-7;P:P -~°=:-~~-=-:--~~Jn2;~-=t-=yp=$g:f_=:""~\~ ~~ ~-~MJ ~ I_J "I~~ 1~1 ' -.. ,-. "25' Ml/JI•---·o --.--r ---" ·--r---+·---= I <I ~ · ·' '· ··---------------I . l'I, " ' .?"'--.• 25 • ,1 -...,._ ~----.__ ' '. \ +,. '·n /5 l~1-·· lffitjf. ---· --);-:(: ..... tr.~ .. . ·. f (,25' MIN. <:_" 25' MIN. ', I 2'5~M-·1·'•· -/ " • __ -_·--_--"' -_::,_··---•• ·,--•••• _ ,-., I --r _,_ 'Y-. .e\:·.·WMt ~ .. ·;_; 1 ' *® YARD DR IN 1 * , v? *"'',:::, ' ,, · > -----~---=-~-----\_,----.\' \ )? __ ~ /!1 \Ex.-~ -<\::-:~_.-_~ :.:-:-· :-:-1 : \. I TOP 454.2 ·-. * (f) I {fl / ® 1"'1 1 * ® ! ' -----" , \ 1 o • 1 --, ffi-:;'\,\ ·-I t "' I ~oR ROOF .•. \ ' fl"·' I '-.! . I '-"" YARD DRAIN ~ ' ' I \ \ r" --1 "• 1· ' 1· . ..J.. .. .,.,. '' , 1 1 v"RD DR'"IN "-'1 . 1 ,, 1 ,,.f: r.op 458 ~ ui 1 1 1 ; 1 1, · · · -~ · ' DRAIN ONLY I 'n n 'i 1 -·' I °' " -~ •. I I \ r · · t· • · · · · · \ 1 ' ' TOP 456.6 )' ;_460 I ', FOR ROOF, '. \ : \ I • I I I I ·1-. . · I I i,; YARD DRAIN :g FOR ROOF f YARD DRAIN :)l , DRAIN ONL y "t;, /;; ' "' i I EX. BUILDING . :1:~ : . < I , i'"'AD fl.. 454. 7 I ;g~ tg~; '" DRAIN ONL y ; TOP 457.4 T PRDPOSEO 15' ' P, ";' I I \ -L --J I I .. ·"* »I i i 25' MIN. , ',1 FORROOF WATERJEASEMENT\5 •I' 1 --11¥,;·p· ' DRAIN ONLY J( DRAIN ONL r , q I CLEANOUT r ~ · cc L i 2 ' " 4 ' 1' 'IPAD EL. 458.81 \'t I (TYP) d.-_J L,I 11>•·1 < '<< --rrnrx, WM IPAD EL. 455.91 IPAD EL>. 457.11 IIPAD EL 457.91 : / ,t ~ ' "· '2,S:J I I iB"PVC i 6"PVC '/ / : EXISnNG'cROUND \ \'lj \Q'2-'2,0':)9 ' { STORM •@ 2.00% MIN. @ 2.00% MIN. ,t J, ,I '•,/ CONTOUR rr:P) \ \ ':\ PT = 2+67.QZ CLEANOUT \ CB 4 \ (TYP) ', / • 6 °' ' ' ' I --L___ 1 (TYP " ' I ' 1 • 10' PRIVATE STORM ,. . _7 __ , _.,.,-,,j-_.,.,.,., • ~~+:~~8::-~-:~-~-/,-:::::-1 , •• ,\ \1 PAD EL. 458.8,1 11 i QRAINAGE ErSEME_MT CEMEN~ CONCRETE \ : : ROLLED 1CURf! TYP \ : : I ' I , 7 I \ ' 10' PUBLIC UTILITY 1 EASEMEf!/.T TYP I : IPAD EL.'' t,58.81 ) ROOF AND F0071/-IG DRAINS I I •••••••w ~~ •• ,__ .. ··-••••" PROPOSED FINISH 1 . GRADE CONTOUR (TYP) I ,-1 SCALE: 1" = 40' \ / SHALL 8£ INSTALLED , 1 W/ PERFQRA TED PIPE L-, '2,6 \ oi'2iO~o 0 20 40 80 \ 1 CONNECT/ON (TYP) \ • I • I CTR·COS \ I I I I I I l I ~ // = 4-f-~BO 8 \ STORM CLEANOUT PAD EL, (TYP) '• 459.1 , : \ , \ I I 6" PVC @ 2.00% MIN. (TYP) \ '"-' I I b, *'P ~ I I ~ ,,, 1-~Li \\ [ \_ PERFORATED PIPE UfiDERDRAIN 1' 1, ., FOR TOT LOT CONNECT",JO 8" r,', 1 PVC nGHTUNE DRAIN '\ 1 ; • /£-452.68± (SEE LANDSCAP.E I \ . I ' ' f_~ANS) g \ \ ' \ \ [PAD EL. 459.51 '® , 1 <.,. * ' ' \~ I ' i I -· .. I i ,5• ROCKERY .CLEANOUT , /DRAIN (TYP) .. (TYP) i 25'IM1N.T' •"' ,,.,... t ; / / 5}"MIN. TYP iFALL PROTECTION 'FENCE !ca 19 ITYPE1W/S0UI) ill) CONNEtT TRACT A, LOT 9 1 ROp(ERY DRAIN TO CB I /E-453.00 8" PVC T/GHTLINE ' YARD DRAIN TOP 458.6 FOR ROOF 1. DRAIN ONLY f ! 295 LF INTERCEPTOR TRENCH DRAIN SEE DETAIL BELOW /,, \ i o'2-'-'oS9'-' YARD DRAIN TDP 459.0 FDR ROOF DRAIN ONLY -cif"iib "rYPt:""f'"'W OPEN GRATE CONNECT TRENCH DRAIN PERF PIPE TO CB IE-458.5± 8" nGHTLINE Tr CB 19 I 10' PR/VA TE STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT 5' BSB FINISH • ..., 3' 6" DIA. RIGID PERFORATED PVC PIPE (PERFORA T/ONS IN UPPER HALF HALF OF PIPE ONLY) 3 4• TO 1-1 2" DIA. WASHED GRA VEL INTERCEPTOR TRENCH CROSS SECTION NOT TO SCALE * W/ 1' THICK 11 6' WIDE 11 8' LONG' RIPRAP PAD csr,ppp NOTES: ALL POLLUTANTS, INCLUDING WASTE MATERIALS AND DEMOLlnON DEBRIS, Tl-IA T OCCUR ONSITE SHALL BE HANDLED AND DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE CONTAMINA noN OF STORMWA TER. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING AND PREVENTA T/VE: MEASURES WILL BE TAKEN TO ENSURE THAT THE SITE WILL BE KEPT CLEAN, WEIL ORGANIZED, AND FREE OF DEBRIS. NO POLLUnON PRODUCTS ARE TO BE STORED ON THE SITE UNLESS A PLAN IS SUBMIITED AND APPROVE:D BY KING COUNTY ODES. A DETAILED LIST OF PERSONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO KING COUNTY DOES PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCT/ON ACTIVITY ON THE SITE INCLUDING THE TESC SUPERVISOR AND PERSONNEL RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROPER REFUELING OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND CONTAINING ANY CONCRETE WASHOUT FACILITY. PORTABLE SAN/TAT/ON FACILITIES WILL 8£ FIRMLY SECURED, REGULARLY MAINTAINED, AND EMPTIED WHEN NECESSARY. SOLID WASTE WILL BE STORED IN SECURE, CLEARLY MARKED CONTAINERS. SEE SHEET 2 FOR ILLUMINATION REQUIREMENTS. TRACT 8 SHALL BE OED/CA TED TO KING COUNTY UPON PLAT RECORDING. THE FINAL PLAT SHALL INCLUDE THE RECORDING OF APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF STORM WATER BMP'S AS DESCRIBED IN APPENDIX C OF THE DRAINAGE MANUAL. A DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT WITH THE REQUIRED TEXT OF INSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE RECORDED TO ADDRESS THE PROPOSED LOT DISPERSION AND RAIN GARDEN. SEE ALIGNMENT PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL CURVA TUR£ AND ROAD DIMENSIONS, SHEET 3. *CONNECT ONE DOWNSPOUT TO GRAVEL FILLED TRENCH. THIS BMP TO PROVIDE TREATMENT FOR 700 SF OF ROOF DRAINAGE. CAUUON PROVIDE ACCESS DURING CONSTRUCTION TO LOCAL TRAFFIC/ EXISTING DRIVEWA Y.S'. SITE PREPARATION, FILL, EXCAVATION AND COMPACTION RECOMMENDATIONS ARE LOCATED IN TH£ GEOTECHNICAL £NG/NEERING REPORT BY ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. DATED 1/27/05 ALL CATCH BASINS TO 8£ TYPE I UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. ALL CATCH BASINS TO HA VE VANED GRATES UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. CATCH BASINS HA VE BEEN SIZED TO MEET CURRENT KING COUNTY AND WSDOT KNOCKOUT REQUIREMENTS USING ADS N-12 PIP£ CONTRACTOR MAY WORK DIRECTLY 'MTH CATCH BASIN MANUFACTURER TO REDUCE CATCH BASIN SIZES PROVIDED KNOCKOUT REQUIREMENTS ARE STILL MET. LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN IS APPROX/MA TE AND MAY NOT BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION OF UTILITIES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. YOU MUST CALL 1-800-424-5555 NOT LESS THAN TWO FULL BUSINESS DA Y.S' BEFORE BEGINNING EXCAVATION WHERE ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MAY 8£ LOCATED. FAILURE TO DO SO COULD MEAN BEARING SUBSTANTIAL REPAIR COSTS. JAMES H. SANDERS, P.E. DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER Comments: -1-· ,;. ol' Completion Date f/df"/ 11,fl Comple'uon "&te Approval Date © 2008 TRIAD ASSOCIATES \. T ASSOCIATES 12112 115th Ave. NE Kirkland, WA 98034-6929 425.821.8448 425.821.3481 fax 800.488.0756 toll free www.triadassoc.com L r1 n cl D e v e I o µ 111 ~ 11 l C d 11 s u I 't r1 11 / s "' u 0 0 ~ ~ ~ u lQ "' "' < o; o; o; o; o; " :,.. Q, ~ ~ Q, 2 ~ t .. il! 2 w " Q, " , ~ !;;] = ~ ~! l1l ~ " "' " "' 5 ; "-~~"~~ 1'.jlO ... ~J... ~ ~ s <::, ii .: .. il ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ lii ra~~~~ ! ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~!;;]tiit!! ~~s~~s~~ f.E .-N l'l .... ,"J "-J<> I '-J"-J GERALD F. BUCK, AICP PROJECT MANAGER NICK A. YING£R. PLS PROJECT SURVEYOR RICHARD A. TOMKINS. P£ PROJECT ENGINEER M£I-SH10U UN, ASLA PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FIRST SUBMITTAL DATE: 2/16/07 SCALE: BORIZ.: 1 "-40' l'!BT.:N/A EXPIRES: 8/4'/e STAIIP NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED JOB NO. 04-257 SHEET NO. 6oF12 ----------------- i i ! • ' ! ' I ' j ! ' "' iil <o -c:, ~ . c:, ;'; ~ ~ "' ~ N ~ ~ "' 1+00 2+00 SE 1/4, SE 1/4, SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23N., RANGE SE., W.M. • • • • i EXISllNC GROUND EL . @ 'I: Of ROAD ( TYP) \ (CONSTf!UCllDN €) "' ~ 0, ~ ":i N ;;'; "' "' ~ ~ 't-"' 3+00 ROAD A MINOR ACCESS 25 MPH PROFILE SCALE 1"-40' HOR/ZONTAi 1"= 4' VERTICAL \ c,, ~ ··························································?····· I ~ ~ i • • • FINISH GROUND EL . I@€ OF ROA{) (TYP) (CDNSTRUCflQN (£) ' • <o ~ ~ "' ~ 4+00 f .................................................. 440 ........ -------,-.. • -~ ~ ~ 5+00 *PROV/OE !LLUM/NA noN LOW POINT CLEV -446.95 LOW POINT $TA -1+37.46 · . . ... . . . ............. PVI STA ',, 1 +52.JB. ·+· P\i1 STA ·2+j4 ........... . ' . . . $1"' . :· ....... . .. 460 PVI ELEV -446.58 PVI ELEV -452,50 ;f; ;i! 460 · ····················· 50.00' VC 100.00' VG < ;!:; ~ • • • co l ft) 0, " ! ········-···r< ~-···'+ Q;)······i···"··"····· "~ "' <tj ! ........ i . --f vi~ '• '• . §;? §;? ~ ~ "' "' en en .... C) ;,; "' ' r 450 .......................... .,. ".?! · .... ; ·········1"' "' ... ,-;- i II / --1-..._1 /• ........ ill, / ~-. / I -_,1 II • .. ............. ·············1r ······ 11 11 11 ; -· --. --- ----:Ex. 10" SS . -----.----. .... c:, ~~ c:, c:, "' C) ~t : ~ II ! ___ , ---------------_______ d. -85% ----2, • • i • L EX. SSMH ........ r·r. L ....................... ·························· .CBtt ................... L ...... . TOP 452.28 ·····································i440 4401 • CB! RIM 447.09 70" IE 440.24 70" IE 440. 74 W !THRU CURB INLET TOP! 446.62 8" If 444.98 12" !/E 444.65 ' EX. 8" ' 12" IE 449.30 • • CB 9 TYPE li--48" W. SOLID LOCK/NC LID TOP 453.94 , 12' IE 448.66! 26'.·8" DI @ 0.62% 45" BEND , p;. OVID£ ETHAFOAM P~f! OR .......... EX. ·s, ........ ···· ························ ..... EQ(JAL ... BET'NEEN.EX •.. 12 .. so (SEE ROAD A fROFILE) EX.. 8 ,, 45 . BEND 45· B'END ANP PROPSED 8" SO) ! "'EXc,;·,.cse;,·s,"·Mc"if= __ ~ . ··To·:BE'f?EMOVED RIM 454.,63 EX. a"'. 45' BEND .......................................................... , ' ! 'ex. 19'.12" : i (TO EX. CB TO NORTH) E:X. CB TOP 447.34 > 12" IE 442 87 (IN--E:) , 72" IE 442.77 (IN·W) ! 12" IE 442.59 (Di/T--5) 1+00 • CB!/3 W ROLLED VANED ORA 'TE TOP, 446. 77 70" IE 447.47 8 ,, IE 44!7_47 (E) TO BEjREMOVED 70" IE 447.37 8" if: 445.14 B" IE 4-l,1. 47 (IN--S) i ' ' ' 16'-',12" DI @ 14.7±% ····················· ................... ' ............................................ ' ' ' '' . ............ .. ....... ''" ''" .......................... ; Ex1snNc GROUND EL. @ 'I: OF ROAD ( TYP) \ , (CONSTRUCflON €) ' i • ' ············-·-·1····· .. FINISH CRouJD cl I @ 'I: Of; ROAD, (TYP) (CONSTRUCllON fil) . "' :;:; ' ~ ~ \ " I ' i 2+00 3+00 SE 125TH STREET SUBACCESS 25 MPH PROFILE SCALE 1"= 40' HORIZONTAi 1"= 4' VERTICAL \ ( ! ' ( I ! " cci "' "' \ CAU71QN ' ' ' LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN IS APPROX/MAT£ AND MAY NOT BE ACCURA T£ OR ALL INCLUSIVE. IT IS THE CONmACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO AELD VERIFY LOCATION OF UTILITIES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSmUCTION. YOU MUST CALL 1-800-424-5555 NOT LESS THAN TWO FULL BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE BEGINNING EXCAVATION WI-IERE ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MAY BE LOCATED. FAILURE TO DO SO COULD MEAN BEARING SUBSTANTIAL REPAIR COSTS. ~~ Re~glneer , Se Eng({ft JAMES H. SANDERS, P.E. DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER Comments: 'T· /,!· tJ,f' Completion Dote Approval Date I © 2008 TRIAD ASSOCIATES \. T D ASSOCIATES - 12112115thAve. NE Kirkland, WA 98034-6929 425.821.8448 425.821.3481 fax 800.488.0756 toll free www.triadassoc.com ' . . ' ' ,, Lc111rl De11elo11ment Ca11sultants ~ ::::! ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ Cl) ~ ,q: ~ ~ Ct: ~ ;,: ~ [;j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h 13 r,... r,,, r,,, ~ t ~ 3-~ts~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~! !! i ~SScuS GERALD F. BUCI<. AICP PROJECT MANAGER NICK A. YINGER, PLS PROJECT SURVEYOR RICHARD A. TOl,,/K/NS. PE PROJECT ENGINEER MEI--SHIOU UN. ASLA PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FIRST SUBMITTAL DATE: 2/16 /0 7 SCALE: BOJllZ.: 1'-40' vmr.: 1'=4-" STAMP NOT VAIJD UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED JOB NO. 04-257 SHEET NO. 7or12 ,. ------·~----------------------- ' • • ' 6" EXPANSION ~ ~ JWNT ~ 2 :'..1 I T, ~. Lr;:'2~·.07.%7 _J 4. , 0.05 FT. 'FT. ~. · .. •f"-' ~· rr--J, ~ [ . · .. '. '., :• •• .-, ~ CEMtNT CONCRETE SIDEWALK I. 1 '-6" . I • NOTE: TOP OF LIP AT DRl\!!'WA YS. VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER (K.C. STANDARD DWG NO. 3-002) NOT TO SCALE SIDEWALK-- '"'--CURB, OR CURB AND GUTTER I If I 0 DETECTABLE WARNING ----o"---r· ,, .A;-*"" ___ 11 _l1 PATTERN (SEE DETAIL) u ~ ·J u C ---= ',;.; /"'.'. =:J-... c=_ -=>--1 -........_'-----... I CROSSWALK CURB RAMP 1A @ DETECTABLE WARNING PATTERN AREA SHALL BE YELLOW, IN COMPLIANCE WITH STD, SPEC. 8-14.3(3) SIDEWAL.K NOTES -CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK RAMP TYPE 1A PLAN LAYOUT 1 MIN. A 1 5/8" 8 ?ff: .. C D 7JBH MAX. 2 3 B" 1 1 ,· -3/4" 1 7 J 16" PLAN ~~ ~µ ELEVATION DETECTABLE WARNING PATTERN DETAIL 1. PLACEMENT OF GRATINGS, ACCESS COVERS AND OTHER APPURTENANCES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED ON CURB RAMPS, LANDJNGS AND GUTTERS WITHIN THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE. 8 @ RAMPS SHALL BE TEXTURED USING TRUNCATED DOME PATTERN (SEE DETAIL THIS PAGE), DETECTABLE WARNING PATTERN ~;HALL BE YELLOW IN COMPLIANCE WITH WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 8-14.3(3) 3, RAMP CENTER LINE SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO OR RADIAL TO CURB RETURNS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER. 4. RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT CORRESPONDING SIDEWALK LOCATIONS ON OPPOSITE SIDE OF STREETS WHEN RAMPS ARE CONSTRUCTED ON ONE SIDE OF STREET. SEE FIG. 3-010. @ LANDING SHALL BE MINIMUM 4 X 4'. @ CURB RAMP 1A MUST BE INSTALLED UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED. 7. SEE FIGURE J-001 FOR CURB AND SIDEWALK JOINT PLACEMENT. Depart, rie11t al Tr,mspartaticn RLI<ld Services OMsi~n 2007 Design and Kiny Cuunly Canstrc.dian St~ndards ------. CURB RAMP 1A 11, _J ~ 12 1- AG. 3-011 3-21 S£E PLANS --CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK FOR RADIUS-· \ --·3/8" EXPANSION JOINT, TYP. roP WIDTH OF CURBS VARIES WITH TYPE or CURB (SEE FIG, 3-002) FLUSH 4" THICK CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK \__ KAMI-' r1:xruRE ® ~~DEPRESSED CURB CURB RAMP 2A DIMENSIONS MEASURED ALONG 5' MIN LANDING __ 6" CEMENT CONCRETE BACK EDGE OF $10EWALK-....____ \ Ii PEDESTRIAN CURB -1 6' _j._ f,' ' CEMENT CONG. -RAMP--/ -rR~r..-\ SIDEWALK ~-,ft"'°.:"".:,ci=/=~~~t' SEE PLANS FOR RADIUS i 12 ~ -1 , "j;i,;;i,,,;;;,;;;.;mia,, 1 ' ;>E,' IE/J 12 1- . . .,.---PLANrER STRIP, TYP. TOP WIDTH OF CURBS VARIES WITH TYPE OF CURB (SEE FIG. 3-002) -------3/B~ EXPANSION JOINT, TYP. (SEE STD, PL.AN f--3) CROSSWALK ----- CURB RAMP 28 NOTES: 1. PLACEMENT OF GRATINGS, ACCESS COVERS AND OTHER APPURTENANCES SHALL NOT lJ[ LOCArED ON CURB RAMPS, LANDINGS AND GUTTERS WITHIN THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE. @ RAMPS SHALL BE TEXTURED USING TRUNCATED DOME PATTERN (SEE FIGURE 3-011 ). DETECTA3LE WARNING PATTERN SHALL BE YELLOW IN COMPLIANCE WITH WSOOT STANDARD SPECIFICA"rlON 8-14.J(J) 3. RAMP CENTER LINE SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO OR RADIAL TO CURB RETURNS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPFWVED BY THE COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER. 4. RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT CORRESPONDING SIDEWALK LOCATIONS ON OPPOSITE SIDE OF STREf.'.:fS WHEN RAMPS ARE CONSTRUCTED ON ONE SIDE OF STREET. SEE flG. 3-010. 5. THIS OETAIL APPLIES TO BOTH ROLLED AND VERTICAL CURB ROADWAYS. 6. SEE 1'1~.u_RE 3-001 FOR CURB AND s~'°'DE'"W~A~LK~JD,~l"~'~P-'LA~C~E~M~'"~'~· ~~~~~~~~~~~~~- Depart111<.mt of Tro_n~;mrtation Road ~11r11rns LW,is,on 200/ u~sign and Klng C<;>unty Conslructlon St~ndMds. CURB RAMP 2A, 2B ALTERNATE FIG. 3-015 3-25 SE 1/ 4, SE 1/ 4, SECTION NOTES 2.0% 4• •• . .. . ~-.· ~4 . 12· 24" • 1/4" EDGEO GROO\!!' 2.0% • . . " 5~" .. 12· OPTIONAL FOR INTEGRAL POUR CEMENT CONCRETE ROLLED CURB SECTION SIDEWALi< ... 4 oo' -·~ NOT TO SCALE ··--y- CURB, OR CURB AND GUTTER DETECTABLE WARNING MIN. PATTERN (SEE DETAIL)--.J.-.-1-"< @ C =-oO -ry:V CURB RAMP 1 8 (zJ 10.0· FLUSH LS' f 12,1 ":::: ~:~PE • •. o· MIN@ • I 7 i-·· ·::,:• .. ; . ; 4", ;H,ICK CEMENT -GRADE BREAK & 2.0' FLUSH-·-· .. CONCRETE SIDEWALK J/8~ EXPANSION JOINT SECTION A (VERTICAL CURB) 10.0' 6.0' MIN. 4.0' MIN.@ >-----~~=~------· ·-MIN. 12: 1 MAX. SLOPE -4" THICK CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK · · GRADE BREAK & 3/8" EXPANSION JOINT SECTION A (ROLLED CURB) 1. Pl./lCEMENT OF GRATINGS, ACCESS COVERS AND OTHER APPURTENANCES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED ON CURB RAMPS, LANDINGS AND GUTTERS WITHIN THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE. @ RAMPS SHALL BE TEXTURED USING TRUNCATED DOM[ PATTCRN (SEE FIG, -3-011). DETl::CTABLE WARNING PATIERN SHALL BE YELLOW IN COMPLIANCE WITH WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 8-14.3(.3) 3. RAMP CENTER LINE SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO OR RADIAL TO CURB RETURNS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER. 4. RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT CORRESPONDING SIDEWALK LOCATIONS ON OPPOSITE SIDE OF STREETS WHEN RAMPS ARE CONSTRUCTED ON ONE SIDE OF STREET. SEE FIG. 3-010. @ LANDING $HALL BE MINIMUM 4 X 4'. 6. CURB RAMP 1A MUST BE INSTALLED UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED. (j) CURB RAMP 1B IS USED TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO TWO CROSSWALKS ONLY WHEN IT IS UNFEASIBLE TO INSTALL CURB RAMP 1A FOR EACH CROSSWALK. 8. SEE FIGURE 3-001 FOR CURB ANO SIDEWALK JOINT PLACEMENT .... Deparlm.,nt af Trn11sportalion ~ Road Ser.ices Di-,ision , Z007 Design ijnd CURB RAMP TYPE 1B King C.:.unty Cor:struct1on sumdMds FIG. 3-012 3-22 FIGURE C.2.4.B TYPICAL GRAVEL-FILLED DISPEl<SION l'l<ENCH f'OR BASIC DISPERSION TRENCH X·SECTION NTS ---- 1112." w 3/4" washed rock slope-- S700 sq. ft. >700 sq. ft. small catch basin or yard drain I. -., _.. ·" ·"-"<" _.. .. ,-. .,...,.. ----"•" .. ,-. .... .,.. •• ?"' • •-• •.•,• •• • •.• •e ,,, .. , 25-Foot Vegetated 'i FloWPath_ Segment} - .. , ' ..... ·~ =· _ .. ,.; ,,.,.~ ...... ; .. ·~·,'"' "·"'-~ -~ _., -"•"' ..... ,..,.,,. •"',..-" _.. ,, ·"· ...... , ~ ~ -"~ .~ ~ .,~ ",'>.C-.~~-_ • .,,. ... .,..,. Simple 1 O·fo ot trench Type I 1c -. CB ·' ' ; -_, Maximum 50 -foot trench w/notch board (see Figure C.2.1.D, p. C·32) PLAN VIEW OF ROOF NTS 2005 Surface Water Design Manual -Appendix C 10, TOWNSHIP 23N., RANGE SE., W.M. R-0-W I 1 '--1 --- 1 ' CEMENT CONCRETE ROLLED CURB TYP R-0-W 1.5' I I - CEMENT CONCRETE ROLLED CURB R-D-W I I 1.5' - CEMENT CONCRETE ROLLED CURB • 1 • 2.5 14' 37' 14' I 1 • 2" CLASS B ASPHALT CONCRETE 1-1/2" CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE '--5" CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE 5' SIDEWALK R-0-W I I 1' '---GRA \!!'L BASE (CLASS "B") MAY BE REQUIRED PENDING SOIL CONDITIONS ROAD A SECTION 12· NOT TO SCALE 32' (£ I 12· o.5'-- 2" CLASS B ASPHALT CONCRETE R-0-W 5' SIDEWALK I I VERTICAL CURB AND CUTTER '--1-1/2" CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE '--5" CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ~-GRAVEL BASE (CLASS "B") MAY BE REQUIRED PENDING SOIL CONDITIONS (START TO 2+15.04) SE 125TH STREET SECTION 12' -1· 2.5 NOT TO SCALE R-0-W 33' 12' 5' SIDEWALK I I 0.5'--- 2" CLASS B ASPHALT CONCRETE ----1' VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER 1-1/2" CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE ~-5" CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ~-GRAVEL BASE (CLASS "B") MAY BE REQUIRED PENDING SOIL CONDITIONS (2+15.04 TO END) SE 125TH STREET SECTION G G G G "' NOT TO SCALE A. 12" AMENDED SOIL W. 4 OF COMPOST 12" STORAGE RAIN GARDEN NOT TO SCALE SEE SHEET 6 FOR LOCATION . ,,,-_,,_,_ ,.,~ .. _,. ,,,,.,.,_. ' --.. -, ___ . I j 'I GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT/ON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS, THE KING COUNTY CODE (KCC), ROAD STANDARDS (KCRS), WASHINGTON STA TE DOT (WSDOT) STANDARD SPECIF/CATIONS AND THE CONO/TIONS OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL. IT SHALL BE Tl-IE SOLE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE APPLICANT ANO THE PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER TO CORRECT ANY ERROR, OMISSION, OR VAR/AT/ON FROM THE ABO\!!' REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN THESE PLANS. ALL CORRECTIONS SHALL BE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST OR LIABILITY TO KING COUNTY. 2. /HE DESIGN ELEMENTS WITHIN THESE PLANS HA ii!' BEEN REVIEWED ACCORDING TO THE KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DE\!!'LOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DOES) ENGINEERING REVIEW CHECKLIST. SOME ELEMENTS MAY HA ii!' BEEN 0\.1:RLOOKEO OR MISSED BY /HE ODES PLAN REVIEWER. ANY VARIANCE FROM ADOPTED STANDARDS IS NOT ALLOWED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY APPRO\!!'D BY KING COUNTY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCT/ON, 3. APPROVAL OF /HIS ROAD, GRADING, PARKING AND DRAINAGE PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION (E.G. DOMESTIC WATER CON\!!'YANCE, SEWER CON\!!'YANCE, GAS, ELECTRICAL, ETC.) 4. BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCT/ON OR DE\!!'LOPMENT ACTIVITY. A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING MUST BE HELD BETWEEN THE DDES'S LAND USE INSPECTION SECTION, THE APPLICANT, AND THE APPLICANT'S CONSTRUCTION REPRESENTATIVE. 5. A COPY OF THESE APPRO\!!'D PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE WHENE\!!'R CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. 6. GRADING ACTIVITIES (SITE ALTERATION) ARE LIMITED TO THE HOURS OF 7 A.M. TO 7 P.M. MONDAY IHROUGH SATURDAY AND 10 A.M. TO 5 P.M. ON SUNDAY. UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED WITH A WRITTEN OEC/S/ON BY THE REVIEWING AGENCY. 7. IT SHALL BE THE APPLICANT'S/CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO OBTAIN ALL CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS NECESSARY BEFORE IN/TIA TING OFF-SITE WORK. EASEMENTS REQUIRE REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCT/ON. 8. FRANCHISED UTILITIES OR OTHER INSTALLA T/ONS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THESE APPROVEO PLANS SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED UNLESS AN APPRO\!!'O SET OF PLANS THAT MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS OF KCRS CHAPTER 8 ARE SUBMITTED TO THE DDES'S LANO USE INSPECTION SECTION THREE DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCT/ON. 9. DA TUM SHALL BE KCAS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPRO\!!'D BY ODES. 10. DEWATER/NG SYSTEM (UNDERDRAIN) CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE WITHIN A RIGHT-OF-WAY OR APPROPRIATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT, BUT NOT UNDERNEATH /HE ROADWAY. SECTION. ALL UNDERDRAIN SYSTEMS MUST BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT STANDARD SPECIF/CA T/ONS. 11. ALL UTILITY TRENCHES AND ROADWAY SUBGRADE SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED TO 95 PERCENT DENSITY. STANDARD PROCTOR. 12. OPEN CUTTING OF EXISTING ROADWAYS FOR NON-FRANCHISED UTILITY OR STORM WORK IS NOT ALLOWED UNLESS SPECIF/CALLY APPRO\!!'D BY DOES AND NOTED ON THESE APPROVED PLANS. ANY OPEN CUT SHALL BE RESTORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH KCRS. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ADEQUATE SAFEGUARDS, SAFETY DEVICES. PROTECT/\!!' EQUIPMENT, FLAGGERS, AND ANY OTHER NEEDED ACTIONS TO PROTECT THE LIFE, HEALTH, AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC. AND TO PROTECT PROPEFITY IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK COVERED BY THE CONTRACTOR. ANY WORK WITHIN THE TRA\!!'LED RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT MAY INTERRUPT NORMAL TRAFFIC FLOW SHALL REQUIRE AT LEAST ONE FLADGER FOR EACH LANE OF TRAFFIC AFFECTED. MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) SHALL APPLY. WORK IN RIGHT-OF-WAY IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN IS APPROVED BY KING COUNTY. DRAINAGE NOTES 1. PROOF OF LIABILITY INSURANCE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO DOES PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE DRAINAGE FACILITIES, PREFERABLY AT THE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. 2. ALL PIPE AND APPURTENANCES SHALL BE LAID ON A PROPERLY PREPARED FOUNDATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT SPECIF/CA T/ONS. /HIS SHALL INCLUDE LEV/cl/NG AND COMPACTING THE TRENCH BOTTOM, THE TOP OF THE FOUNDA T/ON MATERIAL, AND ANY REQUIREO PIPE BEDDING, TO A UNIFORM GRADE SO THAT THE ENTIRE PIPE IS SUPPORTED BY A UNIFORMLY DENSE UNYIELDING BASE. 3. STEEL PIPE SHALL BE ALUM/N/ZED, OR GALVANIZED WITH ASPHALT TREATMENT #1 OR BETTER INSIDE AND OUTSIDE. 4. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, SUCH AS CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES, NOT LOCATED WI/HIN A TRAVELED ROADWAY OR SIDEWALK, SHALL HA VE SOLID LOCKING LIDS. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ASSOC/A TED WITH A PERMANENT RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITY SHALL HA ii!' SOLID LOCKING LIOS. 5. ALL CA TCH BASIN ORA TES SHALL CONFORM TO KCRS, WHICH INCLUOES THE STAMPING ·ou'rFALL TO STREAM, DUMP NO POLLUTANTS" AND "PROPERTY OF KING COUNTY', EXCEPT THAT PR/VA TE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS SHALL NOT HA ii!' THE WORDS "PROPERTY OF KING COUNTY'. 6. ALL DRl\!!'WAY CUL\!!'RTS LOCATED WITHIN KING COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT LENGIH TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM 3: 1 SLOPE FROM THE EDGE OF THE DRl\l!'WA Y TO /HE BOTTOM OF THE DITCH. CUL \!!'RTS SHALL HA ii!' BEVELED END SECTIONS TO MATCH /HE SIDE SLOPE KCRS. 7. ROCK FOR EROSION PROTECTION OF ROADWAY DITCHES, WHERE REQUIRED, MUST BE OF SOUND QUARRY ROCK. PLACED TO A DEPTH OF 1 FOOT, AND MUST MEET /HE FOLl,OWING SPECIFICATIONS: 4"-8"/40%-70% PASSING; 2•-4• ROCK/30%-40% PAS{i/NG; AND -2" ROCK/10%-20% PASSING. INSTALLA T/ON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WIIH KCRS. 8. DRAINAGE OUTLETS (STUB-OUTS) SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL LDT. 9. EXCEPT FOR THOSE LOTS APPRO\!!'O FOR INF/L TRA T/ON BY KING COUNTY. STUB-OUTS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING: A. EACH OUTLET SHALL BE SU/TABL Y LOCATED AT THE LOWEST ELEVA T/ON ON THE LOT, SO AS TO SERVICE ALL FUTURE ROOF DOWNSPOUTS AND FOOTING DRAINS, DRl\!!'WAYS, YARD DRAINS, AND ANY OTHER SURFACE OR SUBSURFACE DRAINS NECESSARY TO RENDER THE LOTS SUITABLE FOR THEIR INTENDED USE. EACH OUTLET SHALL HAVE FREE-FLOWING. POSIT/\!!' DRAINAGE TO AN APPRO\!!'D STORMWA TER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM OR TO AN APPRO\!!'O OUTFALL LOCATION. B. \ I C. I I ~· l' , I 1 I OUTLETS ON EACH LOT SHALL BE LOCATED WITH A F/11!'-FOOT-HIGH, 2" X 4• STAKE MARKED "STORM" OR "ORA/N". THE STUB-OUT SHALL EXTEND ABOVE SURFACE LE\!!'L, BE VISIBLE, AND BE SECURED TO THE STAKE. PIPE MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO UNOERDFIAIN SPECIF/CA T/ONS DESCRIBED IN KCRS AND, IF NON-METALLIC, /HE PIPE SHALL CONTAIN WIRE OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE DETECTION. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ARE REQUIRED FOR DRAINAGE SYSTEMS OESIGNED TO CON\!!'Y FLOWS IHROUGH INDIVIDUAL LOTS. THE APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE LOCATIONS OF ALL STUB-OUT CONVEYANCE LINES WITH RESPECT TO THE UTILITIES (E.G. POWER, GAS, TELEPHONE, TELEVISION). ALL INDIVIDUAL STUB-OUTS SHALL BE PR/VA TELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY /HE LOT HOME OWNER. ALL! DISTURBED PERVIOUS AREAS (COMPACTED, GRADED, LANDSCAPED, ETC.) OF /HE DEVE;LOPMENT SITE MUST DEMONSTRATE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: /HE EXISTING DUFF LA YER SHALL BE STAGED AND REDISTRIBUTED TD MAINTAIN /HE MOISTURE CAPACITY r;/;.,pt;!f,T~O/L, OR; AMENDED SOIL SHALL BE ADDED TD MAINTAIN THE MOISTURE 10. SEASONAL CLEARING IS LIMITED BETWEEN OCTOBER 1 AND MARCH 30 INCLUSIVE, UtjLESS OTHERWISE APPRO\!!'D WITH A WRITTEN DECISION BY /HE REVIEWING AGENCY. •, 11. IMPRO\!!'MENTS AND/OR BUILDINGS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL DRAINAGE FACl~ITIES ARE "IN OPERATION~ (KCC 9.04). , ' ' ., '" ", " ' ' . JAMES H. SANDERS, P.E. DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER Comments: " " .. , .. , "'I-· ! I· c;f Completion Dote Approval Dote © 2006 TRIAD ASSOCIATES ,. ' ,' '\. T ASSOCIATES .- 12112115th Ave. NE Kirkland, WA 98034-6929 425.821.8448 425.821.3481 fax 800.488.0756 toll free www.triadassoc.com ' . L a 11 d D e. v e 1 I o µ'me 11 l c' o 11 s u J l c1 11 l-s: , Cl) ~ C ::: ~ ~ I--,q:. Cl) i..... t5 ==:! ~ ~ ~ a.: ~ C C) ~ U'.l ~ :s: § ~ -~ .... Cl) ~ ~ ~ e ,q: (.) Cl) ~ ,q: Cl ~ Cc ti LI LI LI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " i!ci ~ ~ w t ~ ~ LI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ >: " " " ~ ~$~ s. ~ s. cj ! ~ ~ ~ ~ >i I';; ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ .. " I ~~S! ~ s ~ fQ GERALD F. BUCK, AICP PROJECT MANAGER NICK A. YINGER, PLS PROJECT SURVEYOR RICHARD A. TOMKINS. PE: PROJECT ENGINEER MEJ-SHIOU UN. ASLA PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FIRST SUBMITTAL DATE: 2/16/07 SCALE: HOIUZ.: N/A VEI1!.:N/A STAMP NOT VAIJD UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED JOB NO. 04-257 SHEET NO. 8oF12 .. ,· ,,. """"" '.' . "·"''" . '"'' . SE 1/4, SE 1/4, SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23N., RANGE 5E., W.M. EXISTING STORM SYSTEM TO BE REMOVE"D I I '' I ··, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f I I I I I 47'-12H @ 0.55% , 1 EXISnNG GROUND ··,., o / CONTOUR (TYP} PROPOSED FENCE EASEMENT, PUBUC DRAINAGE EASEMENT I I I 'i.() I····~,., .. ", /3 I . I • N 509853. 49 • E 1644174.94 I --A \ \ \ ' 12" IE 447.93 W/ 1' THICK x 6' WIDE x 8' LONG RIPRAP PAD \ \ ---------·-----+--~~ ...... \ i_______ --~-\ --\ ------------~---i-.,.i., _________ ..,;------GR;~L POND \ ) ACCESS ROAD I -- ,• SEE DETAIL, { -----.,..:::'..__ SHEET 10 \ / - RAIN GARDEN DWS 449.0 \ BOTTOM 447.8,\ CB 6 A CB 7 '~"' J i ........ / ' ,·""· ~,, I ,, ' ------""''----------. ' ------1----- I I I ' ' ------- ' 20'-12"\ 10' PUBLIC UTILITY ', t;:ASEMEN T TYP \ \ 12 \ CB 1 \ ,., ,. (5-~-;"~/ :o-------SD-J<'f'.-'i+ I W' ·. ;/ \., ACCESS ROAD Gli,[E , I CB 17 INLET N 509783.86, E 1644109.12 12" IE 440. 50 I I f5? / I I I I .), /'. •. / ,,,' t '" .. _ ... ' \ \ I \ I ' ' I I I I I \ \ I I I I ! l \ I I I I I I I l I I I I \ •' l '··1 I I', I I •. I I ' I : '-\ I I l I I I 2 SWINGING 8 SlfCnONS\ . ' . I ' 111·-12· @ 4.88.>1:LJ GRA VE"L POND l ACC/fSS ROAD / 12% MAX SLOPE 'i, I SEE DETAIL, ' ' / SHEET 10 I PROPOSED FINISH ,/ GRADE CONTOUR ./ (TYP) (@) \OUTFALL \ N 509700.21 \ \ ' l ·, E'/644216.59 \ , . ' ' \ ' \ 12 •,(E 440.50 ! \ W/ 1\ THICK x 6'-WIOE x 8' LONG RIPRAP.,PAD \ . '· Dl1TF'1fti-~----------------· 1N 509691.13, \ I ~ 1644220.81 . •. \ lJ" IE 444.50 "· .. I I ly/ 1' THICK x 6' WID"' x 8' LONG i \ \ \ R(PRAP PAD '· •.. ' \ \ a:i ·ff\ '·. t"1 C£ \0 j ;J ,, \C) \0 'V ~ ,,.-~ ,/ '</-~ ' ' (1.tJ'i~ I ,:., I I 6' TALL CHA/Ni LINK FENCE J I W/ GREEN Vl/'J'(L GOA TING SCALE: 1" = 20' 0 10 20 40 1 j PER WSDOT SJ!D. PLAN L-2 I I I. -~ .T~E.~ OR tfE 3 ------·------"'li'.~-=:.::::.::·.:-:.:----. ~ '· 460 450 ' .• I • ! ; .. I ' ' ------__ .. , ........ I l ,· / -.. / '" .. '••••••••""'"•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• .... •.,•••••••••••lh ""'"""'"M•••••_,.,., 15·;icgss I -------- f3 I I I -- POND PLAN SCALE: 1 "-20' ---I -------------------------------------------..... ···········r· l I -------------·-------i" -.. -' , CLEANOUT '. .. l?OGKERY 1 ....... r'tPr·· •·· ··· DRAIN (TYPJ -~-" 1·· ... •' ............................................................................................ r .. - TRAbr 8 DET£NnON ! .................................................................. , .. , .. ,. ....... 0 ......... . . ·····1 I PROPOSE. ROCKERY PER AES/! DETAILS, SH_E.E!Jl ... ··· • ... ................... ! --- RAIN n·~ GARDEN v. EXISnNG • • -- toP450~ /ig' A<::_f!_S _'!.0_!_0.::_ = "'---!--------················ . I c:_oUND (TYP} ~ -----_I_ --=·-·--C:C •. := ---r.•. 'i"'-· ·--l -.... _-} -. -l.---j -----j i ' ' ----------- TYPE 11-54" W. SOLID LOCKING LID TOP 450.50 12" IE 442. 50 0 i PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE TYP CONTROL STRUCTURE , ..... SEE_QEIAIL, . .SHEET ta.... ........... [ .... ···········-... ···· ·· · ··--·-··---j .. · 24'-12"1 @ 8.33?i{ I INLET TOP OF SEDIMENT 438.50 OUTFALL ' POND BOTTOM 437.50 12 IE 440.50 , W/ 1' THICK x 6' WlqE x 8' LONG RIPRAP PAD I ' ! ! i ' ···············---·----·--·-------.. -.. -··-··-!·-"""'----.. -------.......................... ··················- ' 430 I, _____ .......... . 1 IE 440.50 ··------··--·r ·--·---...... __ .. . ,. ..... _____ ,,_,,. ' PROFILE: ·scALE 1"= 20' HORIZONTA, 1"= 5' VERnCAL EX. GROUND EL. AT SECnON \ \ POND SECTION A-A! i . .. I I 6' TALL CHAIN LINK FENCE If. W/ GREEN VINYL GOA nN , ······· ·····1 ··· · · ·PER · WSDOT STD;-· PLAN L"'·2 TYPE 1 OR TYPE 3 (TYP) I ' I EXISnNG i 15' GRA VE"L POND ACCESS !2: 1 I Ii 5' BERM GROUND (TYP) \ _ ---- ;M"A"'. X" .. ··"·· 'r'"'\ TOP OF 5' BERM =·-= __ --·~--.i...._.._, I EL. 450.00 ' _ --r •.: --- --- 450 440 ' -,------- -"'':t;:}:J::s/IT>~n r;:: .n; E:::: HTI+:;;i '""' ,, "'"''·'''-''"~"-~ "' .,,,, _,.,.,., '" "· ",,., .. , .; , , , '-""""·'· •. •M,, ,, , ,,,,,,,,,; , •,, o o o'o'o ,,,,, :. : :;;-;;.:,,.; ;:":.i~_-,; :::: :;:;::·;'): :: :: ; ; ; ;-; .: : \ :i_f Ki~§;i_:i:ti·! 1·1 :i ;i.:j{l:1:1:·r:·i !················································ \;<~ft\~1ttf }t;::;1:j:j1J·.;·.1·:t:l·l l-f :11:: :: :;.;:;:;:;: :: ; 0 0 ,, '"''''";-,.,,.,, 0 0 0 • .,., PON{) BOTTOM 439.50 • ' '. ' ,--·-· ....... -.-.. - ' -------------------------------I ---------------------------------------! \ - I I 1 . 6' TALL CHAIN LINK FENCE W/ GREEN VINYi. GOA TING If 1' PER WSDOT STD. PLAN L-2 "< " , LOT 1 TYPE 1 OR TYPE 3 (TYP) 6 c:, I 1································· ~~=~~-{ ---~!' ==,r; l ------ , __ ---------1 . ....... ·· I ...... 1 9 i r RAIN GARDEN OUTLET EL. 449.00 PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE TYP • 460 450 440 430 RAIN ' GARDEN_ -----;----___ _ __ s;zD.W.S,_EL. 449.00 -----, RAIN GARDEN VOLUME: REQUIRED VOLUME: 2,447 CF PROVIDED VOLUME: 2,483 CF 460 . ·· 1450 TRACT B SHALL BE DEDICATED TO KING COUNTY UPON PLAT RECORDING. KING COUNTY WILL GRANT THE HOME OWNER'S ASSOC/A nON (H.O.A.) A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FREE OF CHARGE IF THE H.O.A. CHOOSES TO MAINTAIN THE RAIN GARDEN. CB 1, TYPE 11-48" W/ SOLID LOCKING UD 2+55.00, 32.00' RT (RD A) TOP 453.00 12" IE 446.35 CB 6 2+15.10, 14.22' RT W/ BI-DIRECnONAL VANED GRATE TOP 451.91 12" IE 448.54 CB 7 2+15.10, 14.22' LT W/ BI-DIRECnONAL VANED GRATE TOP 451.91 6" IE 449.32 12" IE 448.82 CB 15, TYPE 11-54" W/ SOUD LOCKING LID N 509807.67 E 1644105.85 TOP 450.50 12" IE 442.50 CB 16, TYPE 11-48" W/ OVERFLOW STRUCTURE SEE DETAIL, SHEET 10 N 509803.18 E 1644097.12 TOP 448.00 12" IE 442.27 CB 17, TYPE 11-48" W/ SOUD LOCKING LID N 509789.85 E 1644081.03 TOP 450.00 12" IE 441. 78 15" IE 441.53 (CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY 15" IE) fgg.fflgN OF Ex1snNG ununEs SHOWN 1s APPROX/MA TE ti AND MAY NOT BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. IT IS THE /~:.' CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO RELD VERIFY LOCA noN • ,. OF ununES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCnON. • .. YOU MUST CALL 1-800-424-5555 NOT LESS THAN TWO JI FULL BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE BEGINNING EXCA VA noN WHERE ,, :t ANY UNDERGROUND unLlnEs MA y BE LOCATED. FAILURE TO DO SO COULD MEAN BEARING SUBSTANnAL REPAIR COSTS. ING COUNTY D.D.E.S. JAMES H. SANDERS, P.E. DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER Comments: f·lf·t>R Completion Date ttil:ti. Approval Dale © 2008 TRIAD ASSOCIATES '\. T ASSOCIATES 12112115thAve. NE Kirkland, WA 98034-6929 425.821.8448 425.821.3481 fax 800.488.0756 toll free www.trladassoc.com • lnnd De11elopme11t c·o11sulta11ts GERALD F. BUCK, AICP PROJECT MANAGER NICK A. YINGER. PLS PROJECT SURVEYOR RICHARD A. TOMKINS. PE: PROJECT ENGINEER MB-SH/OU UN, ASLA PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FIRST SUBMITIAL DATE: 2/16/07 SCALE: BORIZ.: I "=20' V!R'l.: 1 • -2' STAMP NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED JOB NO. 04-257 SHEET NO. 9oF12 PROVIDE MAINTENANCE ACCESS BY WELDING 4 CROSS BARS TO 4 VERTICAL BARS AS SHOWN. HINGE UPPER ENDS WITH FLANGES/BOLTS AND PROVIDE LOCKING MECHANISIM (WITH PADLOCK) ON LOWER END. LOCATE LADDER STEPS 0/RECTL Y BELOW. A L J 4• DIA. SMOOTH BARS EOUALLY SPACED (4" O.C. MAX.} HOOK CLAMPS 4 PLACES EVENLY SPACED. SEE DETAIL BELOW. 15' (TYP.} SEE NOTE 1 LOWER STEEL BAND J 4"TH/CK x 4• WIDE. FORMED TO FIT IN GROOVE OF CB RISER PLAN VIEW 24" SEE NOTE 1 45' J 4"THICK x 4"WIDE LONG SMOOTH BARS WELDED TO UPPER AND LOWER BANDS. (24 BARS EVENLY SPACED, SEE NOTE 1) UPPER STEEL BANDJ4x 4" WIDE RIM=448.0 SMOOTH VERTICAL BARS HOOK CLAMP ANCHORED TO CB RISER CB RISER . ' .. "'. · ... :.-.. ·\>.:. ... HOOK CLAMP NOTES: ( %. . . : SECTION A-A 1. DIMENSIONS ARE FOR INSTALLATION ON 54• DIA. CB. FOR DIFFERENT DIA. CB'S ADJUST DIMENSIONS TO MAINTAIN 45" ANGLE ON "VERTICAL• BARS AND 7" O.C. MAX. SPACING OF BARS AROUND LOWER STEEL BAND. 2. METAL PARTS: CORROSION RESISTANT, STEEL PARTS GALVANIZED. CB 16 OVERFLOW STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE Permanent Surface Water Control Pond Sign 48" 1112'' l r I This pond is in our care. Storm water Runoff is held here after storms. It is released slowly or stored until the next storm when it is Pond replaced by incoming flows. This helps prevent downstream flooding and erosion and helps clean the water. For more information or to report littering, vandalism or other problems, call 24" @ King County Department of Natural Resources Facilities Maintenance at 206·296-8100. Department of Narural Resources and Parks Pond Name and Number / /~ ~ I/~ /\ / (, \., / / / / / m-+~' \ ' _) ( / I ) '-(_,A Sign Specifications: Size: 48" wido by 24" high Material: .125 min. gauge aluminum Face: Non relective vinyl or 3 coats outdoor enamel (sprayed) Lettering: Silk screen enamel where possible, or vinyl letters Face Colors: Siege background with teal letters Type Face: Helvetica condensed; Title 3"; Sub title 1·1/2"; Text 1" Border: Outer border 1/8" wide, distance from edge: 1/4", all text 1-3/4" from border. Posts: Pressure treated 4x4, beveled tops 1-1/2" higher that sign face Installation: Secured to chain link fence if available. Otherwii:;e install on two 4"x4"pressure treated posts mounted atop gravel bed, installed in 2' -6 1 ' concrete filled post Placement: holes (8" minimum dia.). Top of sign no higher than 3' -6" from ground. Use 6 3/8"x 2" hot dipped galvanized lag bolts & washers. Face sign in direction of prlm;;,.ry visual or physical occess. Place at lease 6' from perimeter of site. Do not block any access road. Do not place within 6' of structural facilities, e.g. manholes, birdcages etc. DDUS 1.info-bo81dpo,,d r.1c.!f Hev. 0'1· 16-200:t 3' -6" (tyr PERMANENT SURFACE WATER CONTROL POND SIGN NOT TO SCALE SE 1/4, SE 1/4, SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23N., RANGE 5E., W.M. REMOVABLE WATERTIGHT ' COUPLING I.E. (SEE I ~ RESTRICTOR it DETAIL) 6" MIN. ~ 12 GA. PLA TE Wl'.!DEO TO I ~ "' ,.....___ 6" ELBOW WITH ORIFICE 1-AS SPECIFIED, 12 GA. -5• MAX. ELBOW DETAIL NOT TO SCALE STANDARD STEPS 6" ELBOW PER DETAIL, THIS SHEET NOT£: OUTLET T££ TO 8£ FABRICATED TO SLOP£ OF OUTLET PIP£ NOTCH WEIR L=l.5' I ,,- 0 I I OUTLET OF TEE SECTION SHALL BE SMOOTHED WALL METAL PIPE WITH OUTSIDE DIAMETER 1/4' LESS THAN INSIDE DIAMETER OF CONNECTING PIPE - 0 159' CB 15 PLAN VIEW SCALE: 1" = 2' TYPE 11-54' CATCH BASIN 8' SHEAR GA TE W CONTROL ROD FOR CLEANOUT/DRAIN. SEE owe. 2-026 OVERFLOW JAIL HOUSE WINDOW, CIRCUMFERENCE 6' STANDARD STEPS OR LADDER. 5££ KCRS owe. 2-006 FRAME, GRATE & SOLID COVER MARKED DRAIN WITH LOCKING BOLTS. SEE NOTE J & KCRS ORA 'NINGS 2-022 AND 2-02J RIM EL. 450.5 (MIN.) TOP OF BERM EL. 450.0 TOP OF JA/LHOUSE WINDOW EL. 449.0 OVERFLOW JAILHOUSE WINDOW CIRCUMFERENCE LENGTH-6 PROVIDE 5/8" VERTICAL GAL VAN/ZED STEEL BARS 4" 0. C. IN FRAME BOTTOM OF JA/LHOUSE WINDOW D.W.S. EL. 448.0 8" SHEAR GA TE ii". CONTROL ROD FOR CLEANOUT RAIN. SEE KCRS owe. 2-026 12' IE 442.5 .. • • ' ~ .' • • • ., ' . . ~ . . . . . . <1.. . ,I ' ,<I.. .. . • • ~' )1 .,,-L _______ -~~~~~-,. ORIFICE #1, 1-1/2"~ /-, I I I'...._ .,,i._' ,'-,t I I I I ~-~ 12· • • • . . tlf---1-.JJ ' ' -. .. .. ;.i. ·• .. , EL. 440.50 ' ..... • '' .. • -" 54• • " ' •. ~ ... ·~ A,·•: ....... .. .d. ·~ ' . . •. ' CB 15 FLOW RESTRICTOR SCALE: 1" -2' OUTLET TOP OF 12" RISER EL. 448.0 BOTTOM OF 5" WIDE NOTCH EL. 447.JO ORIFICE :J 1-1 '2"16 EL. 446.J 5• ELBOW ORIFICE '2 1-5 8"¢ EL. 445.10 6" ELBOW J"x0.090 GAGE SUPPORT BRACKET ANCHORING STANDPIPE TO CATCH BASIN WALL (TYP} 11'-12· g 2.09% 12" IE 442.5 1' SECTION OF PIPE A TTACH£D BY GASKETED BAND TO ALLOW REMOVAL NOTES: 1. METAL PARTS: CORROSION RESISTANT. NON-GAL VAN/ZED PARTS PREFERED. GALVANIZED PIPE PARTS TO HA VE ASPHALT TREATMENT 1. 2. FRAME AND LADDER OR STEPS OFFSET SO: A. CLEANDUT GA TE IS VISIBLE FROM TOP B. CLIMB-DOWN SPACE HAS 2' CLEAR ZONE FROM LADDER C. FRAME IS CLEAR OF CURB TOP OF SEO. STORAGE LIVE/DEAD INTERFACE TOP OF SEO. STORAGE LIVE/UEAD INTERFACE LIVE/DEAD INTERFACE DESIGN WATER SURFACE TOP OF SEO. STORAGE LIVE/DEAD INTERFACE TOP OF SEO. STORAGE LIVE/DEAD INTERFACE LIVE/DEAD INTERFACE DESIGN WATER SURFACE PONO STORAGE TABLE DEAD STORAGE CELL 1 CELL 2 EL. AREA .d VOL VOL. SUB AREA .d VOL. VOL. SUB TOTAL (FT) (SF) (CF) TOTAL (CF) (SF) (CF) TOTAL (CF) VOL. (CF) 438.5 429 0 0 440.0 611 290 780 442.0 2,184 2,795 J,575 442.5 2,438 1,156 4,7JO 4,7JO 440.0 J,222 0 0 442.0 4,767 7,989 7,989 442.5 5,110 2,469 10,458 10,458 UV£ STORAGE EL. AREA ,I VOL. TOTAL (FT) (SF} (CF} VOL. (CF} REQUIRED LIVE VOLUME: 45,190 442.5 7,548 0 0 444.0 6,250 10,J49 10,J49 PROVIDED LIVE VOLUME: 53,167 446.0 11,466 17,716 28,065 REQUIRED 11,Q VOLUME: 14,640 448.0 1J,6J6 25,102 53,167 PROVIDED W VOLUME: 15.188 .. CF fil CF Ii -··:: : --ii!-:_;;: ... ;;:· ,;;:: :i'!.vik1 AS-CONSTRUCTED POND STORAGE TABLE EL. (FT) 438.5 440.0 442.0 442.5 440.0 442.0 442.5 EL. (FT) 442.5 444.0 446.0 448.0 DEAD STORAGE CELL 1 AREA .d VOL. VOL. SUB (SF} {CF} 7VTAL (CF) UV£ STORAGE AREA .1 VOL. TOTAL (SF} {CF} VOL. {CF} 15' (SE£ PLAN} 1.0% 6" THICKNESS CRUSH£0 SURFACING, BAS£ COURSE CELL 2 AREA .d VOL. VOL. SUB 7VTAL (SF) (CF) TOTAL (CF) VOL. (CF) REQUIRED LIVE VOLUME: 45,190 PROVIDED LIVE VOLUME: XX.XXX REQUIRED 11,Q VOLUME: 14,640 PROVIDED W VOLUME: xx.xxx PONO CF CF CF GRAVEL POND ACCESS ROAD (TYP) NOT TO SCALE CAUllON LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN IS APPROX/MAT£ AND MAY NOT BE ACCURA T£ OR ALL INCLUSIVE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION OF UTILITIES PRIOR TO PROC££DING WITH CONSTRUCTION • YOU MUST CALL 1-800-424-5555 NOT LESS THAN TWO FULL BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE BEGINNING £XCA VA TION W/-/£R£ ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MAY 8£ LOCATED. FAILURE TO DO SO COULD MEAN BEARING SUBSTANTIAL REPAIR COSTS. D.D.E.S. f·/1'·01' Completion Date J. IF METAL OUTLET P!Pt: CONNECTS TO CEMENT CONCRETE PIP£: ftl::t! OUTLET PIPE 7V HA VE SMOOTH O.D. EQUAL TO CONCRETE PIPE 1.0. LESS 1/4~ 4. PROVIDE AT LEAST ONE J'x .090 GAGE SUPPORT BRACKET ANCHORED TO CONCRt:TE WALL. (MAXIMUM J'-0' VERTICAL SPACING) 5. LOCATE ELBOW RESTRICTOR(S} AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE MINIMUM CLEARANCE AS SHOWN. JAMES H. SANDERS, P .E. OE"1,LOPMENT ENGINEER Comments: Appro\lal Date © 2008 TRIAD ASSOCIATES \. T ASSOCIATES 12112115th Ave. NE Kirkland, WA 98034...(3929 425.821.8448 425.821.3481 fax 800.488.0756 toll free www.triadaseoc.com L an cl D e v e I o p 111 e n l C a n s u' I l B 11 L s' ti [.l u u ~ ~ ~ ~ < < "' "' "' "' "' " i.i .. .. ~ .. ::! ~ ::! ::! ::! w ~ ~ .. ~ , ~ ~ GERALD F. BUCK, AICP PROJECT MANAGER ~ < "' ~ NICK A. YINGER. PLS PROJECT SURVEYOR RICHARO A. TOMKINS, PE PROJECT ENGINEER MEI-SH/OU UN, ASLA PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FIRST SUBMITTAL DATE: 2/16 /0 7 SCALE: HORfZ.:N/A VEBT.:N/A E~ES: 8/.Ve STAIAP NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED JOB NO. 04-257 SHEET NO. 10or12 EX. CB TOP 447.34 72" 1£ 442.87 (IN-£} 7 2" 1£ 442. 77 (IN-W} 12" /£ 442.59 (OUT-5} INT 1+00 SE 125TH ST = 1+14.50 144TH PLACE SE EX. 15' PUBLIC WATER EASEMENT EX. PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT FOR OVER HEAD POWER, TELEPHONE AND CABLE LINES TO BENEFIT TH£ ADJACENT PROPERTY 16' EASEMENT AGREEMENT FOR INGRESS AND £GRESS REC. NO. 5284273 CB 12 CB 14 SE 1/4, SE 1/4, SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23N., RANGE 5E., W.M. I ·/----- I 1 CB 9 1 r@JD /.~: h ·--. . ., .. "'-----~-........ ~~,.~ ' Ii/ ·r,·-; <I [' T r, / .k/1,...i'f I"-" I OPE.fl SPACE I PROPOSED 10' WA 7E"R EASEMENT Iii I I I 13 CB 8 lil I SSMH 1 ~ CB 6 I 12" SD·~- " ~ -- /Iii ~ (OUTFALL) / , I '---~~ 12 .. SD \ ,...__.,._ »''~RAIN GARDEN\ · · · .. "12'.' -SD , 1 ' \ \ \ ' ·---~ rnscr c) 1 rr; r, r.;; DE !LIV T!O!V I _..,,;;·.···· I EX. SSMH 1 2 PC= 1+76.86 CB 7 SSMH 2 CB 4 PT 2+61.92 \ : \ \ .·.·r,, ::,,i> . CB 2 12" SD ,.. (jD ,\ CB 1i; I PC = 3+66.26 / CB 3 12 SSMH 3 CB SA 11 10 3 4 FIRE HYDRANT (TYP 5 ' . 'C .. I \ t,:/ f, --··········· 0 -,,' C·IJ·/r•-/ < . l i ;},) •. ./",.h,>;t/o~·~ -~.-' 7·•0 ' ' r G t:h ! 1-V ! I I I i ,' I I L ............... /, L_l ------------ 6 CTR CDS = 4+43.80 SSMH 4 7 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT TYP 9 --------- 11 11 -II 11 111 10' PR/VA 7E" STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT 111 ..... ··-·"-···-"-o--...... J 11 11 111 111 II ........ --------...... .. 11 ---,--------,,1:...i 10' PR/VA 7E" STORM 1 •• -' ' - I DRAINAGE EASEMENT i I / CB 20 I I i I I SCALE: 1" = 40' 0 20 40 80 ~---.i CAUTION LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN IS APPROX/MA TE AND MAY NOT BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONS/8/UTY TO RELD VERIFY LOCATION OF UTILITIES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. YOU MUST CALL 1-800-424-5555 NOT LESS THAN TWO li FULL BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE BEGINNING EXCAVATION WI-IERE fi ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MAY BE LOCATED. FAILURE TO t DO SO COULD MEAN BEARING SUBSTANTIAL REPAIR COSTS. JI JAMES H. SANDERS, P.E. DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER Comments: 4·/f'·~I Completion Date Approval Dote © 2008 TRIAD ASSOCIATES . \. T ASSOCIATES 12112115thAve. NE Kirkland, WA 98034-6929 425.821.8448 425.821.3481 fax 800.48B.0756 toll free www.triadassoc.com ' ' I ' . ' La 11 d Dev e Io [l 111 ~ n t C·o 11 s u I l B 11 IS ' ' ' I )... 1-.. ::c:; i,... m ,q: a:i ~ ~ a.: ).. i,... 0 0 .... ~ ;::! 8: i,...; :s; ::::> ~ ~ .__ .... Cl) ;c: Cl) ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ,q: tr: l) l) GERALD F. BUCI<, AJCP PROJECT MANAGER NICK A. YINGER, PLS PROJECT SURVEYOR RICHARD A. TOMKINS. PE PROJECT ENGINEER MEI-SH/OU UN, ASLA PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FIRST SUBMITTAL DATE: 2/16/07 SCALE: uomz.: 1"=40' vm.:N/A z. , , I oa STAY!' NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED JOB NO. 04-257 SHEET NO. 11oF 12 SE 1/4, SE 1/4, SECTIOf',I 10, TOWNSHIP 23N., RANGE 5E., W.M. € • " .o • ' RAIUFENCE BY OTHERS --..........._ AS NECESSARY '- 1'MIN- ,--MIN 1'.WIDE LAYER OF 2" T04" QUARRY SPALLS ADJACENT TO ROCKERY UPPER3' 2-3 MAN ROCKS .f >--,&z;"~-,6~1.~I~~ l ,, J.' (___ T-1-_JL._ ___ / "--sJ '' J-.s-l 3' .......;:i STRUCTURAL FILL COMPACTED TO 95 % OF ASTM D1557 6' MAX WALL HEIGHT SEE TABLE 2 BELOW LOWER3' 4-5 MAN ROCKS t .:;}./' ~ 2' TYP {,J!.J \j "l . ,.-,.;.. '--<;·'!· 1-· .•• ------------/;~; "" :o__x~, -':J. -\ 1;z.:,: i;1/{\ ~Jt le;. SEE TABLE 2 I~~!:{ \_ CHIMN~ DRAIN ?--.clnt:, JC . FOR GRID LE~.fl~1H~-, " "' 'Ji':~ --,____ J'~ 2/3 WALL HEIGHT ',_~c1-·~;.,'< ti -:t,· ,-"l;[/si _ /C.,;;6 12" MIN 'V< ~~~''':?;tG·YfS .. Xi.f:}_;;;::G:.~~;/Sj.~}~~;:~-;A?t(?i~~ --'-------'----'-',.-------%,]\~;: '? ".f GEOGRID REINFORCEMENT LAYERS FORTRAC 55 OR GEOTECHNJCAL ENGINEER-APPROVED 4" DIA PERFORATED PVC APPROVED EQUIVALENT Rook -1-M°an FIRM UNDISTURBED SOIL-MAY REQUIRE PIPE WITH 6" COVER AND OVEREXCAVATION 2" BEDDING OF 1'' WASHED ROCK • MIN 1 % SLOPE TO OUTLET Table 1 -Minimum Rock Sizes Lb. Avg. Dimens~~ {11:_)_ 100-300 12 to 18 Table 2. Gaogrid Lengths 2-Man 300-800 18 to 28 ------28 to 36 3-Man 800-1500 Max Wall Height Max Spacing o_f Grid i.ll.'ers Min Len ofR uiredGrid 4-Man -- ~-Man ····--1--1500-2200 36 to 48 O' -3.0' 2200-4000 48to 54 :l.O' -6.0' REINFORCED FILL ROCKERY DETAIL NOT ·ro SCALE NOTE: 1. CHECK WITH THE MANUFACTURER SPECIF!CATJONS ON CORRECT DIRECTION OF ORIENTATION FOR GEOGRID TO OBTAIN PROPER STRENGTH. NIA ·--·-·--····· '·" 3" OF FILL SOIL IS REQUIRED BETWEE'N OVERLAPPING GEOGRID FOR PROPER ANCHOAAGE :111-fl]J : "ISl··f'J '1 l11i ~. fTIJ] .·.· ~ ., ' . MINIMUM WALL RADIUS INSIDE CURVE . ::iurSIOE CURVE 4.0' (AT BOTTOM OF WALL) 4·.o· (AT TOP OF WALL) GEOGRID INSTALLATION ON CURVES NOT TO SGALE Associated Earth Sciences, Inc . 11ml ••• Ce!ehrafinr; 251Jears of Service June 22, 2007 Project No. KE04710A Cam West Development, Inc. 9720 NE 120" Place, Suite 100 Kirkland, Washington 98034 Attention: Ms. Sara Slatten Subject: Reinforced Rockery Recorrunendations Martin Property SE 125• Street and 146" Place SE King County, Washington Dear Ms. Slatten: As requested, this letter summarizes our recommendations for the design and construction of the proposed reinforced rockery wall on the south sides of Lot 9, JO, and 11 of the Martin property project. Our participation on this project has included the con1pletion of a subsurface exploration and geotechnical design report, dated January 27, 2005, and the design of tllis reinforced rockery, We understand that a rockery is proposed along the south sides of Lots 9, 10, and 11, and will face primarily structural fill to raise site grades on this project. The maximum rockery height is planned to be about 6 feet. In general, all aspects of the planned rockery wall should be constructed in accordance with applicable guidelines for such features as face batter angle, toe embedment, rock size, placement, and drainage features. Examples of acceptable rockery construction guidelines are the Ai:.sociated Rockery Contractors' Standard Rockery Construction Guidelines, King County Building and Land Development's Rockery Standards, or other applicable local guidelines, Reinforced rockeries are designed to perform as a stable reinforced fill, protected from erosion by a rockery facing. As such, performance of the finished system is dependent on adequate construction of both the reinforced fill and the facing. Sheet 1 of 1, attached to this letter, provides a graphical representation of the reinforced rockery construction, as described. Geogrid reinforcing should be placed at the specified elevations shown on the referenced plan sheet, and should be laid flat The geogrid-reinforcing material should be free of wrinkles and folds. The joints between the separate geogrid-reinforcing material should be completed in accordance with the manufacturer's recommended procedures, which vary depending on the specific product selected, Adequate length should also be taken into consideration fur the wrap around face height and top embedment length of the geogrid-reinforcing layer. Suitable fill material should be placed in loose lifts not exceeding 8 inches in thickness and should be uniformly compacted with the l<ltl<la,,dQlfu,,• 911 FilihArenu,, Suite 100• Kiddand, WA 98033 • I' I (425) 827-7101 •FI (425) 827-5424 ~Office• 291I ll2Ht:wittAvenu~ Suite 2 • Everett, WA 98201 •PI (425) 259-0522 • F j (425) 252-3408 www.acsgeo.oom Gricl not reQuired ----·---a.rr ' DESIGN NOTES: DESIGN OF THE REINFORCED ROCKERY IS BASED ON SOILS REPORT PREPARED BY AES!, PROJECT NUMBER KE04710A, DATED JANUARY 27, 2005, AND PLAN SHEETSSHOIMNG EXISTING/PROPOSED GRADING BY TRIAD ASSOCIATES. 1: THE FOLLOWING DESIGN VALUESVV'ERE USED; INTERNAL ANGLE OF FRICTION FOR REINFORCED SOIL= 30 DEGREES UNIT WEIGHT OF SOIL"' 132 LB/CU Fr MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT= SEE DETAILS BATIER OF WALL=6V:1H BACKFILL $LOPE= VARIES, SEE DETAlLS 2. GEOSYNTHETIC FABRIC SHALL BE FOR TRAC 55 OR EQUIVALENT AS APPROVED BY AES! .. 3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS. 4. FOR BIDDING PURPOSES, THE DESIGN WALL HEIGHT SHALL INCLUDE BOTH THE ABOVE GRADE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLANS AND THE BELOW GRADE EMBEDDED PORTION OF THE WALLS SHOv\lN ON THE WALL OETAlLS. GENERAL NOTES: 1, CONTRACTOR IS REPONSIBLE FOR SITE SAFETY, AND PROTECTION OF TEMPORARY CUT AND RLL SLOPES. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SLOPES, SHORING, DRAINAGE OR OTHER MEASURES NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN STABILITY. 2. FILL PLACEMENT OVEB, GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCEMENT: A. REINFORCED Fill MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN MAXIMUM $-INCH LOOSE LIFTS ON THE GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCEMENT. B. THE GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE PRETENSIONED BY HAND TO REMOVE · WRINKLES. TENSIONING IS USUALLY FACILITATED BY THE USE OF STEEL STAKES. APPLY CONSTANT TENSION TO EACH SECTION OF GEOSYNTHETlC REINFORCEMENT UNTIL SOIL FILL HAS BEEN PLACED. SOIL Fill SHALL BE PLACED, SPREAD, ANO COMPACTED IN SUCH A MANNER THAT PREVENTS THE DEVELOPMENT OF WRINKLES ANO/OR MOVEMENT OF THE GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCEMENT. C. IF POSSIBLE, SOIL F!Ll SHALL BE Pl.ACED FROM THE WARPPED FACE OUTWARD TO ENSURE THAT THE GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCEMENT REMAINS TAUT. SOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN UNIFORM LIFTS. 3. WALL LAYOUT/SITE PLAN, SITE DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL ARE NOT PART OF THIS DRA\IIIING, (SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR THIS INFORMATION). CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FORWALLL(?CAT/ON, FINAL GRADES AND VERIFICATION OF /J.NY REQUIRED SETBACKS FROM WALLS. 4. ROCKERIES HIGHER THAN 5' SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF ROCKS OF GRADUATED SIZES FROM 5-MAN TO 3·MAN, FROM B0T1'.0M TO TOP. ROG KERI ES OF 5' OR LOINER SHAU. BE CONSTRUCTED OF 3-MAN TO 2-MAN, FROM BOTTOM OF TOP. 5. THE BASE OF THE ROCKERY SHOULD BE STARTED BY EXCAVATING A TRENCH TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12 INCHES BELOW SU BG RADE INTO FIRM, NATURAL GROUND. IF LOOSE, SOFT, OR DISTURBED MATERIALS EXIST AT THE BASE ROCK LOCATION, THEY SHOULD BE REMOVED, KEEPING IN MIND THAT THE MAXIMUM ROCKERY HEIGHT DESIGN INCLUDES THE BURIED PORTION. 6. THE BASE ROCK SHOULD HAVE A MINIMUM WIDTH {PERPENDICULAR TO THE LINE OF THE ROCKERY) OF 40 PERCENT OF THE HEIGHT OF THE ROCKERY. ALL ROCKS SHOULD ALSO MEET THE v\£1GHT REQUIREMENTS SHOV'JN ON TABLE 1. 7, THE ROCK MATERIAL SHOULD ALL BE AS NEARLY RECTANGULAR AS POSSIBLE. NO STONE SHOULD BE USED THAT DOES NOT 8<TEND THROUGH THE WALL. THE ROCK MATERIAL SHOULD BE HARD, SOUND, DURABLE, AND FREE FROM WEATHERED PORTIONS, SEAMS, CRACKS, OR OTHER DEFECTS. THE ROCK DENSln' SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 160 POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT. ·. 8. ROCK SELECTION AND PLACEMENT SHOULD BE SUCH THAT THERE WLL BE MINIMUM VOIDS AND, IN THE EXPOSED FACE OF THE WALL, NO OPEN VOIDS OVER 8 INCHES ACROSS JN ANY DIRECTION. THE ROCKS SHOULD BE PLACED lN A MANNER SUCH THAT THE LONGITUDINAL AXIS OF ·THE ROCK VVILL BE AT . RIGHT ANGLES OR PERPENDICULAR TO THE ROCKERY FACE. EACH ROCK SHOULD BE PLACED SO AS TO LOCK JNTO TWO ROCKS IN THE LOVV2R TIER AFTER SETTING EACH ROCK COURSE, ALL VOIDS BETWEEN THE ROCKS SHOULD BE CHINKED ON THE BACK \'\IITH QUARRY ROCK TO ELIMINATE ANY VOID SUFFICIENT TO PASSA2-INCH SQUARE PROBE. THE ROCKERY SHOULD BE LIMITED TO 10 FEET HIGH. 9. A DRAIN CONSISTING OF RIGID, PERFORATED, PVC PIPE ENCLOSED INA 12·1NCH~W1DE PEA GRAVEL TRENCH SHOULD BE PLACED BEHIND THE LOI/VER COURSE OF ROCK UNITS TO REMOVE WATER ANO . PREVENT THE BUILDUP OF HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE BEHIND THE WALL Tr[E DRAINAGE MATERIAL BEHIND THE WALL SHOULD CONSIST OF QUARRY SP ALLS WITH A MAXIMUM SIZE OF 4 !NCH ES AND A MINIMUM SIZE OF 2 INCHES.° THIS MATERIAL SHOULD BE PLACED TO A 12-INCH Ml NJ MUM THICKNESS BETWEEN THE ENTIRE WALL AND THE GEOGRID REINFORCED FILL THE SPAU. MATERIAL SHOULD BE PLACED IN LIFTS TO AN ELEVATION APPROXIMATELY 6 !NCHES_BELOWTHE TOP OF EACH COURSE OF ROCKS AS THEY ARE PLACED, UNTIL THE UPPERMOST COURSE IS PLACED. MY SPAU. MATERIAL FALLING ONTO THE BEARING SURFACE OF A ROCK COURSE SHOULD BE REMOVED BEFORE THE SETTING . OF THE NEXT COURSE. 10. THE GEOGRID SHOULD PROVIDE A MINIMUM ALLOWABLE LONG T.ERM DESIGN STRENGTH OF 2000 LBJFT. FORTRAC 55 OR ENGINEER-APPROVED EQUIVALENT MAY BE USED. THE GE<X:iRID MUST BE TAUT PRIOR TO AND DURING BACKFILLING . 11. THE GEOGRID-REINFORCED FILL SHOULD BE PlACED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROCKERY. A TEMPORARY FORM IS RECOMMENDED TO MAJNTAINTHE SHAPE, LINE, AND GAADE OF THE fi8NFORCED FILL FACE DURING CONSTRUCTION. STRUCTURAL FILL SOIL SHOULD BE USED FOR CO/IISTRllCTION. STRUCTURAL FllL 1S DEFINED AS NON-ORGANIC SOIL, ACCEPTABLE TO THE GEOTECHNICAl. ENGINEER, , PLACED IN MAXIMUM.8-INCH LOOSE LIFTS WITH EACH LIFT BBNG COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 95 PERCENT . OF lHE MOD!FE6 PROCTOR MAXIMUM DENSITY USING ASTM:O 1557 AS THE STANDARD. . 12. THE AREAS ABOVE THE ROCKERIES SHOULD BE REVEGETATED OR SURFACED 'MTH PAVEMENT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER THE ROCKERY CONSTRUCTION TO REDUCE THE EROSION POTENTIAL. 13 .. INSPECTION OF THE ROCKERY WALL FOUNDATION SOILS, DRAINC\GE, GEOGRID, STRUClURALFILL, . AND ROCKERY WALL CONSTRUCTION BY AESI IS REQUIRED. CONTACT SCOTT HANNAH (425i827-IT01 TO . SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS. appropriate equipment such that a minimum compaction level of 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density (American Society for Testing and Materials [ASTM]:D 1557) is achieved. Once the reinforced fill is constructed. it is typically shaped at the face, and the rockery facing is constructed conventionally. For this project1 we have designed the rockery for a maximum height of 6 feet. We have assurned that the on-site soil wiJI be used. Based on these criteria, we have calculated a rninirnum vertical spacing of 2 feet, a mhlimwn top embedment length of 3 feet, and a rnininmm embedment length of 6 feet behind the face of the fill e1nbankment for each geugrid-reinforcement layer. We rcc01nrnend the use of a geogrid that has a minimum allowable long-term design strength of2,000 pounds per foot All rockery sections with heights between 3 and 6 feet should include the above- recommended geogrid reinforcements. Rockeries Less than 3 feet in height do not require reinforcement. We reconunend that we be allowed to observe construction of the reinforced rockery to confirm that our design recommendations are adequately interpreted and incorporated into the project. We would also perfonn a number of density readings as work proceeds to verify that the recommended minimum compaction levels have been achieved. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. Please do not hesitate to call ifwe can be of further assistance, or if you have any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Kirkland, Washington Kurt D. Merriman, P.E. Principal Engineer Attachment: Sheet I of 1 -Rockery Wall Details and Notes cc: Triad Associates 12112 115• Avenue NE Kirkland, Washington 98034 Attn: Ms. Rebecca Cushman KDM/ld -KE04710A3-Projws\200407J01KEIWP 2 rn UJ I- 0 z a z z r2 <( ~ (!) rn z _J O'. -LU I ;:: a. UJ 0~ UJ O'. -a a. >-z I- _J -z _J I-::, ~ O'. 0 .,: () :a, (!) >-z a:: "' UJ ~ u 0 a:: EXPIRES 1.1/20/0fJ I DRA'MtBY: EIN GHECrasD B't. KM °'~ 6/07 PROJ£CTNO. KE04710A · s H ' 1 of ' 1 T GE07ECHNICAL CONDIUONS PROVIDE FOR SPECIAL INSPECnONS BY AN EXPERIENCED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST FOR COMPLIANCE WITH RECOMMENDA nONS IN THE PROJECT " GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS BY ASSOC/A TED ' EARTH SCIENCES, INC. DA TED JANUARY I 27, 2005 AND JUNE 22, 2007. WRITTEN 1, RECORDS OF ALL INSPECnONS AND p APPROVALS SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE :I KING COUNTY SITE INSPECTOR. ;ji THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHALL HA VE INSPECnON: MONITOR AND APPROVE THE PLACEMENT OF ALL STRUCTURAL ALL INCLUDING THE POND BERMS, AND STRUCTURAL ALL ADJACENT TO THE ROCKER/ES, VERIFY THE SUITABILITY OF BEARING SOILS AFTER EXCAVA noN AND PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF STRUCTURAL ALL. RETAINING WALLS IF ANY. ROCKER/ES, ROADS AND FOOnNGS. VERIFY PROPER ALL PLACEMENT AND COMPACnONS WITH FIELD AND LABORATORY DENSITY TESnNG. "'f· /~·OP Completion Dote JAMES H. SANDERS, P,E, DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER Appro1Jol Dote Commenh1; © 2006 TRIAD ASSOCIATES "" T D ASSOCIATES 12112115th Ave, NE Kirkland, WA 98034-6929 425.821.8448 425,821,3481 fax 800.488.0756 toll free www.triadassoc.com Land Deve16p111e11l Consul)ants Cl) )i.. ~ I--C) ::c: i,.... m ~ ~ ,q: ~ ~ Cl) C) 0 :::! ~ ~ a: :::::; ~ ~ ....i ....i ~ ::,.. ffi ~ C) Ct: tl u u u " " " ~ ~ ~ " t;:; ~ ~ w ~ 2 2 " ~ ~ ~ " ~ " ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ 3-~ts G:I ~ ~ ~ ~ z li 0 tn ~ ~ ~ ,;,; i ~ ~ ~ "' A ~ I ~tsi AS.Sro ~ GERALD F. BUCK, AICP PROJECT MANAGER NICK A. YtNGER, PLS PROJECT SURVEYOR RICHARD A. TOMKINS, PE PROJECT ENGINEER MEI-SH/OU UN, ASLA PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCfilTECT FIRST SUBMITTAL DATE: 2/16/07 SCALE: BOBIZ,:N/A VKRT.:N/A STAY!' NOT VAIJD UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED ::,..• .... ~ 0 CJ <:, ~ ~ JOB NO. 04-257 SHEET NO, 12oF 12 -·--- I') ~ <n ~ 0 Cl w (/) 5 w 0: C> "' Cl <'i -~ -' ['; " r • J .. ! LEGEND PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE ---••---BOUNDARY ------LOT LINE ------RIGHT-OF-WAY ====== GUTTER, FLOW, &: CURB LINE ---·--CENTER LINE --·----EASEMENT ---·----BUILDING SETBACK LINE (BSBL) STORM DRAIN PIPE: -------------ROOF &: FOOTING DRAIN __ .. ___ .......... -,_ ...... ROCKERY DRAIN ········-...... -, .... _. -··-·--SEWER MAIN ·----··· .. --·······---··-······ SEWER FORCE MAIN ·--.. ·-----.. -· SE:WER SERVICE ·--· ·-· --·--WATER MAIN ·-···JOO--·--· --· -·-..• 10' EXISnNc CONTOURS 302· .. . .......... 2' ExtsnNG CONTOURS ---420·--------10' PROPOSED CONTOURS ---,/22·--------2' PROPOSED CONTOURS __,. _ _,.__..,.__FENCE --• • • -"" SWALE OR DITCH ---------TOP OF 40% SLOPE -, -· -· -EDGE OF WETLAND · .. · .... · .. • · · .. · --, BUFFER LINE -II --il--11-DAYLIGHT LINE: = m ROCKERY TT::r:-,, CUT SLOPES JT1>, FILL SLOPES ?@, RIPRAP • MAILBOX SIGN CURB RAMP STREET UGH T LIi///////////// NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTTON EASEMENT {NGPE) = z z z I I I l I ZI RETAINING WALL II @ • @ GUARDRAIL BARRICADE CATCH BASIN, TYPE I CATCH BASIN, TYPE II STORM CLEANOUT YARD DRAIN 0\l!'RFLOW STRUCTURE SEWER MANHOLE SEWER CLEANOUT IB-SINGLE WATER METER '"1 ~w """ m· DOUBLE WA TER METER /RR/GA TION METER DETECTOR CHECK VAL \I!' ASSEMBLY ,+·--DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK VAL VE ASSEMBLY D D D D D GJ GB D (E FIRE HYDRANT FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC) POST IND/CA TOR VAL \I!' (PIV) AIR/VAC RELEASE VAL VE BLOW OFF CA TE VAL \I!' TEE REDUCER CONCRETF: BLOCKING EXISnNG GRAVEL PROPOSED CRA \/EL EXISnNC ASPHALT PROPOSED ASPHALT PA \l!'MENT PROPOSED SIDE:WALK PROPOSED CONCRETE WETLAND ;;e40% SLOPE RIPRAP EXISnNG FEATURES --SO----EXtSnNC STORM DRAIN PIPE ----SS---EXISTING SEWER MAIN --W----EXISnNC WATER MAIN ---PO·----EXISnNG POWER LINE --UGP-· --EXISnNG UNDERGROUND POWER LINE --G----Ex1snNG GAS MAIN --TL-···---EXISTING TELEPHONE LINE 0 EXISnNC CATCH BASIN, TYPE I @ EXtSnNG CA TCH BASIN, TYPE II 0 EXtSnNG SEWER MANHOLE ·0-EXtSnNG POWER POLE [E] EXISnNC POWER VAULT E-- [j]-- o-- EXISTING GUY ANCHOR EXISTING WATER METER EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING AIR/VAC RE:LE:ASE VAL VE EXtSnNG BLOW OFF N EXtSnNG GA TE VAL \I!' ~-EXISnNG CONIFEROUS TREE 0 EXtSnNG DECIDUOUS TREE I I !: + : + : w )-- I + w w I I I I >FOUND TACK IN LEAD IN CONG. MON. IN C.~SE DOWN 1.5' 11-16-00 II L [ I SCALE: 1" = 100' 100' 200' LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER LANO AMERICA TRANSNA TION TITLE REPORT ORDER NO. CS-20096926, DATED OCTOBER 20, 2004 AT 8: 00 AM. THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST. W.M., IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 16 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THE EAST 150 FEET THEREOF; AND THE SOUTH 14 FEET OF THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE EAST 150 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10; EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND ROAD PURPOSES OVER THE NORTH 16 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; EXCEPT THE £AST JO FEET THEREOF SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STA TE OF WASHINGTON. HORIZONTAL DA TUM HORIZONTAL NAO 83/91 VERTICAL DA TUM VERTICAL -NA VD 88 BENCHMARK AND DA TUM CITY OF RENTON SURVEY CONTROL NETWORK MONUMENT #1852 J" BRASS SURFACE MONUMENT FOUND AT THE CORNER OF NE 4TH STREET(SE 128TH ST.) AND 148TH A VE SE EL.=454.78' "78M A• SET RR SPIKE IN W. FACE OF UTILITY POLE NOTES .8' ABO\!!' GRAD£ EAST SIDE OF 148TH A \I!' SE EL.=484.7' * ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES ON SITE ARE TO BE REMO\l!'D * OFF SITE PARCEL LINES, BUILDINGS &: WETLAND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROIMA TE * TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS SHOWN ARE BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY OF THE SITE * THIS PROPERTY SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF GRANTED TO SNOQUALMIE FALLS WHITE: Rl\l!'R POWER COMPANY FOR A POLE LINE. RECORDED AUGUST 3, 1904 UNDER RECORDING NO. 305589. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTON CONTAINED IN SAID DOCUMENT IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO LOCATE THE EASEMENT. Vicinity Map (NTS) TO 1-4 5 NE 4th ST Soils Map (NTS) \ r-' I I ) I SE 120th ST SE 132nd ST SE IJJrd er AgD /'~ \ ' \ I I \ I \ \ AgB ' ("°', ) \ " f---1 ) \ \ '~7 BhX/,' I . J ,, 1 ~' EvB 1 ) , ~==~'..:,,;_~_J_. __ L_~' ...... __ J_LJ.N>l.!.E:_j_4!!}.TH ,4 VENUE 1 ~;ite Pl an Approval Approval of these plans is for construction of road and drainage improvements, site drainage & grading and temporary erosion control in unincorporated King County only. These plans do not authorize any other utility approval or improvements proposed in any State ri11ht of way. Site plan approval is void if the commercial building permit has not been obtained or renewed within two years of approval. Subdivision plan approval is void if the final plat is not recorded prior to the preliminary plat approval expiration. Section PRO RATA SHARE ASSESSMENT ANALYSIS (County Use Only) Township Range Tax Parcel Number 11 Io I 12131 I 0151 1110121310151 I 91318131 Site Location is within the _ drainage shed(s) Pro Rata Shore Ass,essment(s) are: D Required D Not Required from the site due to development for increased storm water runoff. Peak Runoff Assessment Rote($ ) per c.f.s. increoses.(10 year, 2 hour storm) Peak Volume Assessment Rote($ ) per Ac. Ft. increases.(2 year, 2 hour storm) AGREEMENTS, PLAN REFERENCES, PERMITS ETC. (To be completed by Consultant) Preliminary Plat Approval/Permit Issued Date: 4/3/2007 Expiration Date: 4/3/2012 Other Related Permit Numbers Received: Right-of-Way Use Permit Grading Building/Structural Other ______________ _ Board feet of tree removal on site: Cubic yards of material hauled on/off the site: __ 1_1~, 0_0_0 __ Is this a erosion sensitive area site? (Yes/No): __ N_O __ Note: If "yes", a Highly Sensitive Site Erosion Control Supervisor is required. See ESC plan and TIR for details. Date Emergency 911 Police-Fire-Rescue RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL (To be completed by King County) PROJECT INFORMATION YOU MUST CALL 1-800-424-5555 NOT LESS THAN 48 HOURS BEFORE BEGINNING EXCAVA nON WHERE ANY UNDERGROUND ununES MA y BE LOCATED. FAILURE TO DO so COULD MEAN BEARING SUBSTANnAL REPAIR COSTS. PROJECT DEVELOPER: ENG/NEER/SURVEYOR: GEOTECH. ENGINEER: TESC SUPERVISOR: SHEET INDEX COVER SHEET CAMWEST REAL ESTA TE DEVELOPMENT, INC. 9720 NE 120TH PLACE, SUITE 100 KIRKLAND, WA 98034 (425} 825-1955 CONTACT: SARA SLATTEN TRIAD ASSOC/A TES 12112 115TH A VE NE KIRKLAND, WA 98034 CONTACT: GERRY BUCK (425} 821-8448 ASSOC/A TED EARTH SCIENCES 911 FIFTH A VENUE, SUITE 100 KIRKLAND, WA 98033 CONTACT: KURT MERRIMAN (425) 827-7701 CAMWEST REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT, INC. 9720 NE 120TH PLACE SUITE 100 KIRKLAND, WA 98034 CONTACT: MONTE DUNN (425} 825-1955 CAUnON LOCA noN OF EXISnNG unLtnEs SHOWN IS APPROX/MA TE AND MA y NOT BE ACCURA Tc: OR ALL INCLUSIVE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VERIFY LOCA noN OF ununEs PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCnON. NOT£ TO CONTRACTOR: RECORD DRA 'MNGS PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS, RECORD DRAWINGS MUST BE PREPARED BY THE ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED TO THE PERMITTING AGENCY FOR REVIEW/APPROVAL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ANTICIPATE NEED FOR AS-BUILT FIELD SURVEY AND NOTIFY THE SURVEYOR WHEN FACILITIES ARE CONSTRUCTED, ACCESSIBLE AND READY FOR SURVEY. TO AVOID DELAY A/'/D COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH RE-EXCAVATION, OR ADDITIONAL SERVICES TO SATISFY OSHA REQUIREMENTS FOR WORK WITHIN CONFINED SPACE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL: PROVIDE ADEQUATE NOTICE TO THE SURVEYOR TO ENABLE SCHEDULING OF AS-BUILT SURVEY OF THOSE FACILITIES NOT VISIBLE FROM THE SURFACE PRIOR TO BACKFILL (WHEN POSSIBLE), AND PRIOR TO THE Notice Required Contractors shall notify operators who maintain underground utility lines in the area of proposed excavation or blasting at least two business days, but not more than ten working days prior to commencement of excovatfon or demolition In accordance with RCW Title 19. Names and telephone numbers of the operators of underground utility lines In this project appear below. These numbers shall also be used to serve in an emergency conditions os required. Phone Cl TY OF RENTON (425) 255 9600 Son itary Sewer WA IER DISTRICT 90 (425,1 255 9600 Water District PUGET SOUND ENERGY (206) 44 7 32.lE Gas Company PUGET SOUND ENERGY (206) 447 3169 Engineer Plan Reviewer Engineer Supervisor Traffic & Planning Engineer Sensitive Areas Structural Review Engineer Other APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES King County, Washington Power CompClny INSTALLATION OF THE TOPS OF DRAINAGE VAULTS (ALWAYS). ALL BURIED Date UTILITIES REQUIRED TO BE AS-BUILT SHALL BE REFERENCED BY James H. Sanders, P.E. APPROPRIATE MARKERS SUCH AS SHOWN WITHIN THE STANDARD DETAILS1"---c-a1_1 _s._1o_r_•_Y_ou_D-ig ____ o1_AL_A_o_1a ____ 1_a_o_o_42_4_55-5-5------t,.-------·----D-ev_e_lo-p-m_en_t_E_n_g_in_e_e_r _______ J OF THESE PLANS. IF A UTILITY MARKER IS DESTROYED OR REMOVED BEFORE AS-BUILT INFORMATION IS ACQUIRED BY THE SURVEYOR, IT WILL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO EXPOSE SUCH UTILITY FOR MEASUREMENT. Notes PROJECT CONTACT INFORMATION (To be completed by Consultant) en z < ...I a. ...I 0 er:: 1-z 0 () z 0 -en 0 a: w C z < (.5 z -C < a: C, ft w (.5 < z -< a: C :i: a: 0 I-- CJ) ft C < 0 a: (;) Ct'. w co L ()) _Q > l-a: w a.. 0 a: a.. z t fl L ()) _Q L 0 +-' 0 C ·-u L 0 0 u +-' V) ' >' 1-z :::, 0 () C, z -~ 0 z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SURVEY CONTROL AND ALIGNMENT PLA,N GRADING AND TESC PLAN OR, BUT ONLY IF ACCEPTABLE TO THE PERMITTING AGENCY 1. The Developer ls required to notify the Land Use Services Division, Land Use lnspectlon Section (206) 296-6642, three days prior to the beginning of construction for a preconstruction conference and specifically request inspection before beginning: CAMWEST (425/ 825-1955 W E ::J z E ::J z +-' (" ()) L1 L2 L3 L4 L5-6 TESC DETAILS AND NOTES ROAD AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN ROAD AND STORM DRAINAGE PROFILES ROAD AND STROM DRAINAGE NOTES AJID DETAILS PONO PLAN ANO SECTIONS PONO DETAILS AND NOTES COMPOSITE UTILITY PLAN ROCKERY WALL DETAILS AND NOTES COVER SHEET/ STREET TREE PLANTING PLAN LAYOUT PLAN ANO SITE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS SIGNIFICANT TREE RETENTION/ REPLAC:EMENT PLAN AND REQUIREMENT NOTES AND DETAILS: OTHERWISE MAINTAIN AN ACCURATE RECORD OF DRAINAGE VAULT/FLOW RESTRICTOR DIMENSIONS, PENETRATIONS AND INVERT ELEVATIONS; SANITARY SEWER AND STORM DRAINAGE TEE LOCATIONS, STUB CLEANOUT LOCATIONS AND STUB INVERT ELEVATIONS; ALSO WATER BEND AND WATER TEE LOCATIONS, IF REQUIRED; ADDITIONALLY, IF REQUIRED, THE TOP OF WATER MAIN ELEVATIONS AT 50' O.C. SHALL BE RECORDED. THESE RECORDS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO TRIAD ASSOCIATES UPON COMPLETION OF UTILITY /DRAINAGE WORK. REVIEWED BY: MICHAEL MOODY. P£: DA TE: 4/17/07 NO. DA TE REVISIONS BY CK 1 6/29/07 PER KC LETIER 6/12/07 KMP RS © 2007 TRIAD ASSOCIA ITS A. Installing siltation and erosion control measures B. Clearing and grubbing C. Earthwork D. Installation of any underground utility E. Before placing subbase, base or paving surfaces F. Installation of any forms or placing any concrete 2. A permit must be obtained from the office of the Resident Engln~r, Washington State Department of Transportation, before any construction is started on any existing state route. 3. A Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) Permit must be obtained from the Washington State Department of Fisheries prior to any work whEm requlred. Bonding Information I $ -------!-1-" Restoration Bond Amount Performance Bond Amount $ ------~ Name Phone 9720 ~IE 120TH PLACE, SUITE 100 KIRKLAND, Address and Zip Code WA 98034 Q_ 'ti " '-'-" Q) Q) .... C C Cl} CAMWEST REAL ESTATE Name D A Partnership D An Individual (4251 825-1955 Phone "' "' :, 00~ DD 9720 ~IE 120TH PLACE, SWTE 100 KIRKLAND, WA 98034 Address and Zip Code ~ 6 a; TRIAD ASSOCIATES ~ ~ ~ Name t 2:: Ol ~ Jl 6 ,5 12112 115TH A VE NE KIRKLAN[J, D D Address and Zip Code D A Corporation D A Partnership D An Individual (425/ 821-8448 Phone WA 98034 _J LL Ul LLI 0 0 ~ +-' > +-' 0 <( -+-' 0 ()) --, 0 L o_ E Q_ 0 ()) > ()) 0 UNLESS SIGNED ANO DA ITO Sheet 1 of 12 EX. PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT FOR OVER HEAO POWER, TELEPHONE AND CABLE LINES TO BENEFIT THE ADJACENT PROPERTY I SE 1/4, SE 1/4, SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23N., RANGE 5E., W.M. ,., . ._,_ ,-,-· ---·--~ ' II I Ii It 16" EASEMENT AGREEMENT ! 1 I I I I EX. 30' EASEMENT FOR INGRES!jL.fGRESS AND U TIU TIES REC NO. 7208100354 FOIi INGRESS AND £GRESS K ' ' ..... REC NO 5284273 ,., "./ I .i:: EX. /0' WA T£R MAIN £AS[M[NT ~ , f' I -~R[~~~D~DOD0810000949 \, i \?i ~ ~~·0-W R-25 V ~ l I I ....... ~>1 I EX. 10' WAT[R MAIN AS[M[NT I I I / .. ~ L, .. j EX. 15' PUBL/f:_ WATER EASEMENT [X. EASEMENT .._.. l r==+== '.~[;::'.'.;::;-,,::~::..._;.:::c?,;'"':~""::',;::';;'.'~~-:::: .;;;::;;-::.~~-= "': -;--:,:' '";, 7;'7 v ;',:; vv _ _. ..... ~---··-_ __ _ __ ,r( '~ .~ ~ -~.J REC. NO.i 8706030864 ---~ -,--+-~c4.,= -'' ' " '''' '''' =1- . . I .. ',-.~-~,, :,.,,__,. ······.·---~·=--~-~~ -----' . ·.· .. f, ')' R=25' 15' '"i;' :•··~ • <o · · ·. ·. it/ CONSTRUCT/ON . N88'20'42"W 'C'.::;.,; .. }, ,N <o !: ,,,'.,I ' = J+J4.10 SE 125TH ST REC. NO. 5284213 ,__.,_ _____ ..__,_.., .• _..,._,.. . ·1 ' -1-------~ ,r::~,' /'.'_1··· -_i:_·; / '''' ·1·· ' ' · / GEN TERLIN£ h _w, I<) "q \:!:! !;1~ I' . , EX. JO' WATER MAIN EASEMENT , 14,~ --...._ I iii ["-INSTALL NEIGHBO;HOOD DELIVERY ~~g ~g igg_~~;g;ggg~:; 1 -r ,,;5 / N ·~• 6"£1 / " " : // I .. : ' , 1--. v~ 1 I . . . . I-. . -' . j II .1.·. . ! f · · · · i;·. ' I I l : \ ·. · · I . ·. J I I . .. !'' , .. ;,,, ..... ,, ,,,., .·,,,,, .,: •. I . "' . . . ,'·"l \ . ' ' ' .. ''] '\' . ' ' ' ' ' -~' '" ' ::(j_ , ... " . I· .... " .'·f " .. d --·._·,1. -~ ..... " ., . 'i " ,-. . 'I .. . I ... -.. I ! i]ll. ··.· ... ' ',." . ' ... ·"· ' Lu P : ,, ·r' (';··.,.'"' '" ., .. ,-·'>' i VJ .. ,, JA' ',.,,.>,··1' I '•;;, )u• ' Jl'i ~ ' \ I") '·' '""" 'LIJ I (.) I ,q: 1 ..... I a. I ::i:: I i,...; I l,C') i ;! I I ! R-D-W GEN/ERLINE INT 1+00 SE 125TH ST = 1+14.50 145TH PLACE SE """" -•-••••• •••••-•----~ o·~-""""""'"' '"'"""'"" •••-• i I f . L ., ..... -.... -......... . I · '"I ------__ , '"""' '"' '' I _ EX. 10' DRAINAGE EASEMENT REC. NO. 20060825000187 I I i '" _,_ -----""' . --'''"' ',,,, ,,., ' ! I ,. + I I I I I _ I " ,, -··I·" -.. ,, " r--' ··-· ··----····, ! ' ' i "·---"·-.. -I I -v-r, 4 1·~ T A {/\,·,~__,.' ,·) OF>EN S~'ACE/ REC!?EA T/OtV PC= 1+76.86 '.'!:• <::) i>]i! :.:: k.:·Jjj :, •:J:1' i>f 14' '/1!1 21' 1·1 1NNDDnacu~r(L1E6C)17DN fJOX UNIT .5 11, D') ·1()'.)9,,v 1 ·.·,14 oo· '·, I Iii ,, C, / i PROPOSED 15' 11 ;,sl" 1 >··· ''' ''' I 14'1it 1 ' WA/ER EASMENT 'I I ' I · ..... L ... -- 16' ii I I ' I •.. ·. 1 · ....... ·\ ('.\\\ R= 55. 00 !I --·-············---···r ··~ I I I " 0 .. "'~······----·········--·· ,,, ,,., .. " ---" -;;;,'Ys,,, '-..~ :t ~ -f 1 NB8'20'42"W 104.34' .. , -,,,,,,,.,,.=,,,.,,~.,,, "·•cc,,, = 4+4J.Bo :t .., ik J ROAD -/'~ ''""· I I I I I --" .. -.. ·---· .. , .. _ -· ·c•• \ C" /', 1f{A / LJ ----·----D£7 'C'',/ '/C/ 0/ I !:I' ' (.,, \i -; ' ' I I I ' I ! I I I I ' I ......... ,..... ,., .. ,,, ... -... "I,. I /_ PC = J+66.26 ---...._ •;~'/:~\ 11 : 1 l / 1 'Z ,11 1,.; I "1' \' 7-,, ', \ 1t'l,,,, ,~-ii /\' • ~:c;;ce'., x··v ' ',, ... · .. ·.·,'.,'.·,··.,,, ,/,,./., ,_. '="·"'· I j ~ ••-'""•m••••••-'-""··· •• ~"'"•••••-aoeo,,,vmc,,aa, ; "·<~ ::---;.,"tk';..-c::.':;.,;_-,,.::;:!<';;.;;f'P::~,::~.,. \ ···------.. ··1 --·-· : -· -··-~"·····-···-----------~-.. ····---------·-··"·"'"'"~·--·-· ····----.......... J j ~\-:,:::'.;,_LS:?;;:'.SJ'-,::Y X 1 1 r -- 1 '') , .r.:. I ----/------"<' \ s.·. I j . \ . ' . I j j \ \ / / / \\ \\ .11 : : "' \ '!: .II \\ \\""'''''""' ··---I ' '' '"' ,,,,, '"' '''"""'i ·······"-'"""'•••.,.,.' J \ -_ .. " ; 10 \\, ! 1 1 NBB7D~o·w • I I I 511.02· 11· --i.. f 10' PR/VA IE STORM , DRAINAGE EASEMENT I . I I / I / I I I i I I 10 11 15 14 I SCALE: 1" = 40' ··---- ,t,,. 'TBM A" SET RR SPIKE IN Vw. FACE OF UTILITY POLE 0. 8' ABOVE GRADE EL.=484.7' KING COUNTY D.D.E.S, Revlew Engineer Senior Engineer JAMES H. SANDERS, P.E. DE'IELOPMENT ENGINEER Comments: Completion DottJ Completion Datu Approval Date © 2007 TRIAD ASSOCIATES <: ,q; ~ i,... ~ i ~ .... -.J ,q: -.J ~ <: 0 ~ ~ ::i:: " -.J 0 ~ <: 0 (..) ).. ~ ~ Cl) ... " '-' ~ "' " ti; ~ ~ " "' " ,;;_ ... ~ le ,., ... ; ~ .. ~ c:J ~ ~ I :J ,. ~ ,;..; Ii "' I ~~ ... "' A~ "' • ~ - '\. T ASSOCIATES 12112115thAvo. NE Kirkland, WA 98034-6929 425.821.8448 425.821.3481 fax 800.488.0756 toll free www.triadassoc.com i... ~ ~ 0 ijj ::i ~ i,... Cl) ~ :e ,q: (..) GERALD F. BUCK. AICP PROJECT MANAGER NICK A. YINGER, PLS PROJECT SURVEYOR R£Bf:CCA S. CUSHMAN, Pf: PROJECT ENGINEER MEI-SH/OIi UN, ASlA PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHTIECT FIRST SUBl!l'ITAL DATE: 2/16 /0 7 SCALE: HORIZ.: 1"-40' mrt.:N/A STAMP NOT V!IJD UN1ESS SIGNED AND DATED JOB NO. 04-257 SHEET NO. 3oF12 'I ,, ' ~ :i '' ' . ·! ' .. ' . ' ' ' ' i . I ' , I ,. . r ' ' :. I ' ' ' ' TREE LEGEND ® X EXISTING, SIGNIFICANT TREES TO SE REMOVED * (CONIFER& 8" 4 ASOVE I DECIDUOUS 12" 4 ASOVE) 0 ~ EXISTING TREES TO SE RETAINED 7"" (CONIFER& 8" 4 ASOVE I DECIDUOUS 12" 4 ASOVE) EXISTING TREE DATA TOT AL NUMSER OF TREES ON SITE, 81 TOT AL NUMSER OF 51GiNIF1CANT TREES ON SITE, 40 5YMSOL A COT DEC F 5FECIE5 ALDER QUANTITY 1S COTTONWOOD DECIDUOUS FIR I 3 4 5YMSOL I-! 1-10 F EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN SPECIES 1-!EMLOCK 1-!0LL Y FINE QUANTITY 1 TOT AL NUMSER OF SIGNIFICANT TREES ON SITE TO REMAIN, 2 5YMSOL A 5FECIES ALDER GENERAL NOTES QUANTITY 2 ' \ \ _\ ' \ I I. Prior to final plat recording, a certified arborlet or other qualified pereon ma!:J lnepect and determine the condition or the treee. Treee deemed unhealth!:J ma!:J be removed and/or replaced b!:J flret eubmlttlng a "Flan Revlelon Requeet" to the King Count!:J LUIS lnepector I engineer for review and approva I per KCC l.&.82.IS,& b!:J the DDE5 Site Development Spec la llet / Foreeter. PLAT OF SHAMROCK TREE RETENTION REQUIREMENTS CALCULATION FOR TREE RETENTION ACREAGE FER KCC l.&.82.IS,& (AX!) GROSS ACREAGE -DEDUCTIONS• = NET ACREAGE 3.11AC -1.1.&X AC. = 2.SS AC •DEDUCTIONS, I. VEl-!ICULAR TRACT ACCESS (ROAD -A) 2. UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE (TRACT -S) TOT AL DEDUCTIONS 19,544 SF. 31,293 SF. <DETENTION FOND) S0,831 SF. I.I,& AC SIGNIFICANT TREE RETENTION REQUIREMENTS TREE RETENTION RATE IN R-4 FER Kee l.&.82.IS.& A4, 10 TREES FER ACRE 3.11 AC -LJ,& AC <DEDUCTION) = 2.SS AC 2.SS ACX 10 TREES/AC = 2,& TREES REQUIRED TO SE RETAINED RETAINED SIGNIFICANT TREE CREDIT CALCULATIONS TREE CREDIT CALCULATION& FER Kee l.&.82.lS,& (C) (3) TREE CLA551FICATION TYFE NO. or TREES TREE CREDITS SIGNIFICANT TREES SELOW 18" DIA. TO REMAIN SIGNIFICANT TREES 18" DIA. OR GREATER TO REMAIN 2 X 0 X 1 2 = = TOTAL TREE CREDITS 2 TOT AL EXISTING, RETAINED 51GiNIFICANT TREE CREDITS •.... -• . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . 2 REQUIRED 51GiNIFICANT TREES .......•.............•............................. 2,& REQUIRED REPLACEMENT TREES TO FULFILL 51GiNIFICANT TREE REQUIREMENT ......... 24 SIGNIFICANT TREES TO SE REPLACED SY A NEW OR EXISTING, NONSIGilFICANT TREES 51-!ALL SE A551GiNED A DIAMETER OF 12" FER KCC l.&.82.lS.& (E) (2) REQUIRED REPLACEMENT TREES TREE CREDITS TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENT& 24 X 12" TREE REPLACEMENT CREDIT CALCULATIONS TREE CREDIT CALCULATIONS FER Kee 1.&.82.lS,& (E) (2) (a) TOTAL NEEDED REPLACEMENT TREE CREDITS = 324" • 288" NO.or TREE TREE CLASSIFICATION TYFE STREET TREES TREES CALIPER TREE REPLACEMENT CREDITS IN INCl-!ES 21 X 3 11 = ,&3" e 0.Sd = 12.&" INTERNAL CONIFEROUS TREES (approx. 8'-10' I-IT. = 3" DIA.) S x 3" = IS" e 0.Sd = 30" TOT AL PROVIDED REPLACEMENT TREES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.& TOTAL PROVIDED REPLACEMENT TREE CREDITS ..•.•.•....•...........•.•........... IS.&" TREE RETENTION CREDIT CALCULATION SUMMARY TOT AL PROVIDED REPLACEMENT CREDITS .........•.•..............•.•.•............ 288" TOT AL REQUIRED REPLACEMENT CREDITS . . . . . . . . • . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . 288" ' ' SE 1/4, SE 1/4, SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23N., RANGE 5E., MARTIN PROPERTY Significant Tree Retention Plan W.M. Project Number: LOSPOO 19 Parcel Number: 1023059383 '· N : ':: \ \ \·\ ..... ·. ~ TREE REPLACEMENT LEGEND \ \ \ \ \ Submittal Date: 6/29/07 ' 16"A \ ' ' --- I I I . ',. ··"' ,· ~---1 r----.___ I ' , I &YMeOL eoT ANICAI.../COMMON NAME 01< c.lT'I". SIZE &FACING DECIDUOU6 6TfeET I REE& 0 -----~ --~ NDIF .~AUTt!f1N SRILLIANCE' ---------------- FSEUDOT5LIG,A MENZIE511/ DOOOLA5 FIR GENERAL STREET TREE NOTES: --------- 21 3" CAL. 10' MIN. 8' -10' 1-!T e,1 ST IS'-O.C. lS'-O.C. 1. STREET TREES LOCATION& ARE APPROXIMATE, VERIFY DRIVEWAYS 4 UTILITY LOCATION& PRIOR TO TREE INSTALLATION. ADJUSTMENTS TO 5TREE:T TREES MAY SE NECESSARY TO AVOID CONFLICT&. CONTRACTOR 51-!ALL BE RE5FONSISLE FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO STREET TREES TO MEET Tl-IE FOLLOWING, REQUIREMENT&. • 4' MIN. FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT • 10' MIN. FROM DRIVEWAY I ALLEYWAY • 1!:>' MIN. FROM LIGil-!T FOLE • S' MIN. FROM FIRE 1-!YDRANT, UTILITY FOLE 4 UNDERGiROUND UTILITIES 2. STREET TREES Sl-!ALL SE PLANTED AT Tl-IE RATE OF ONE TREE FOR EVERY 40' OF STREET FRONTAGE. 3. CONTRACTOR Sl-!ALL SE RE5FON51SLE FOR IRRIGATING, STREET TREES DURING PLANT ESTASLl51-!MENT. 4. STREET TREES Sl-!ALL SE LIMSED UF TO,& FEET, UNLESS OTl-!ERW15E NOTED, AND STAKED IN A MANNER NOT TO OSSTRUCT SIDEWALK TRAFFIC. REFER TO KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARD S-009 FOR ADDITIONAL INSTALLATION REQUIREMENT&. S. ON SU5 ROUTES, STREET TREE FLANS 51-!ALL SE COORDINATED WITI-! METRO TRANSIT ROUTE FACILITIES± CONTACT FER50N, FATT COMSTOCK 20.&..&84.IS23 S 4 s. SINGLE TRUNK, WELL SRANCl-!ED, FULL 4 MATCl-!ED. I I I I I I I I I "' I \/ 1------i ,J I CAU71QN I I I / r--, __ I I ,-1 L, 0 I SCALE: 1" = 40' 20 40 80 ~ -··- I I I I r I I SIGNIFICANT TREE RETENTION NOTES: KCC 16.82.156 (S0-220) ' • Pursuant to KCC 16.82.156 an approved Sign;ficant Tree Retention Plan is required for the properly as described on file with King County Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) Records Center, on this sheet of the approved engineering plans Number L05P0019, and Activity Number L07SR015. Tract's A within this plat contain trees that must be retaiQed per said approved Tree Retention Plan. Any proposed c/eari'ng, grading or construction activities that will (or may) impact a significant tree within said lots must be reviewed and approved by Ktng County DOES Land Use Services Division and/or successor, for compliance with said Tree RetenUon Plan. The current landowner and future landowners shall maintain and protect said trees and secure permits as required to perform any maintenance and/or related activity such as hazard tree remediation. • The pennit applicant shall determine that the final tree retenUon plan does not include significant trees unable to survive more than ten years after the date of project completion. • Significant Tree Protection: 1.Prior lo any clearing all trees to be retained shall be flagged. 2. Prior to grading and throughout construction, a temporary chalnllnk, wire or plastic net fence :;hall be used to identify the protected area (drip line) of any significant tree design/Jted for retention. The height of such fencing shall be adjusted according to the topographic and vegetative conditions of the site to provide clear visual delineation of the protected area. The size of the protected area around the tree shall be equal to one foot diameter for each inch of tree trunk diameter measured four feet above the ground or at the drip line of the tree. • At no time during and after construction shall the following be permitted within the significant tree protection area: ( a) impervious surfaces, fill, excavation, or storage of construction materials (b) grade level changes, except in limited circumstances where proposed improvements using permeable materials are determined by an arbor/st to be non-detrimental to the trees root system. • Significant Tree Maintenance: (a) All significant trees shall be maintained for the life of the project including monitoring. (b) AH significant trees shall be pruned and trimmed as necessary to maintain a healthy growi'ng condition or to prevent primary limb fa,1ure. This requirement shall not be interpreted to allow: (1) to'pplng of primary stems (2) pruning that results in the loss of 20 percent of vegetative mass (3) cu.ttlng of major roots, except in preparation for transplantation or as deemed necessary and/or acceptable by a certified arbor/st (4) Wjth the exception of dead, diseased or damaged trees specifically retained to provide wildlife habitat; other dead, diseased, damaged or stolen plan ting shall be replaced imm6diately or the next planting season if the loss does not occur in a planting season. • The Significant Trees to be retained as shown on the approved Significant Tree RetenUon Plan shall be. maintained by the future owners of the proposed Jots, consistent with KCC 16.82.156. Note: A!/ tree's to be removed, pruned, or limbed from pub/le right of ways requires a right of way ose permit from the appropriate public agency and needs to be secured and submitted to KC DOES prior to any clearing in these areas. (Contact Bernard Thompson for clearing In King County Right of Way at telephone number 206-296-0887 or e-mail bernard. thompson@metrokc.gov. LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN IS APPROX/MA TE AND MAY NOT 8£ ACCURATE OR AU INCLUSIVE. IT IS TH£ CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION f·/f ·OJ' Completion Date l-'{'2:ll. OF UTILITIES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCT/ON, YOU MUST CAU 1-800-424-5555 NOT LESS THAN TWO FUU BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE BEGINNING EXCAVATION WHERE ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MAY 8£ LOCATED. FAILURE TO DO SO COULD MEAN BEARING SUBSTANTIAL REPAIR COSTS. ' . ',, . ' " . . ' JAMES H. SANDERS. P.E. DEI/ELOPMENT ENGINEER Comments: Approval Date © 2007 TRIAD ASSOCIATES ---~ • •• --•. , •••• ,. ' i '' "" T ASSOCIATES 12112115thAve. NE Kirkland, WA 98034-6929 425.821.8448 425.821.3481 fax 800.488,0756 toll - www.triadassoc.com Land Development Consultants. ~ ~ ~ .... f5 )... ~ I--. 0 m ~ .... it f5 ~ f a.: "' C) 0 bi:l ~ ~ C) ~ ~ j::: ~ .... i,..;: Cl) ~ ~ tlj ~ ~ :: 0 .... ~ q: 0 i:i: ~ (.? ci5 GERALD F. BUCK, AICP PROJECT MANAGER NICK A. YINGER, PLS PROJECT SURVEYOR RICK A. TOMKINS. PE PROJECT ENGINEER MEI-SH/OU LIN, ASLA PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FIRST SUBMITI'AL DATE: 6/29/07 SCALE: BOBIZ.: 1"=40' VEBT.:N/A STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCH! ECT • MEI-SHIOU LIN CE TIFICATE NO. 826 STAMP NOT VillD UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED JOB NO. 04-257 SHEET NO. l4oF5 ' ', .. ,,., ,.,•,,,_ (, ',, ,, .. ;·,··.,·--.,,,..,,, •.. ,,11,.,.,-~ ' "'- r , __ ~ I r 1 SIGNIFICANT TREE RETENTION NOTES: KCC 16.82.156 (50-220) •PART 1 PLANTING SPEC/FICA VONS General Conditions • Landscape contractor/Developer shall verify that plant installation conditions are suitable within the planting areas. Any unsatisfactory conditions shall be corrected prior to start of work. mien conditions detrimental to plant growth are encountered, such as rubble fill, adverse drainage conditions, significant vegetation, or obstructions, the landscape contractor/developer shall notify KC DOES prior to planting. Beginni'ng of work constitutes acceptance of conditions as satisfactory. •Plants installed in undisturbed areas shall be integrated with existi'ng native vegetation, and planted in a random, naturalistic pattern. LOCA T£/STAK£/VERIFY PLANTING AREAS • Landsc;,;e contractor/Developer shall field locate, stake, and verify planting areas and configurations prior to planting. This shall approximate what is shown on the DOES approved Significant Tree Retention plan. All revisions/changes shall be pre-approved by DOES and documented for recording at final plat approval. APPROVE PLANVNG LOCAVONS AND SPACING •Planting locations shown on planting plans are approximate, based on anticipated site conditions. Actual plan ting locations may vary from those shown due to final site conditions and locations of existing vegetation. Nevertheless, any variations from the planting plan will require prior approval by KC DOES. • Significant tree spacing shall be a minimum of fifteen feet (15' for non-street trees or 40' on center for street trees) or as stated on the approved planting plan. Spacing shall be adequate to allow significant tree's room to expand through the future years. PART 2 -PLANT MATERIAL STANDARDS •Landscape contractor/developer shall examine plant material prior to planti'ng. Any material not meeting the requi'red specifications shall be Immediately removed from the site and replaced with like material that meets the required standards. Plant material shall meet the requirements of County, State and Federal laws with respect to plant disease and infestations. Inspection certificates, required by law, shall accompany each and every shipment and shall be submitted to the Landscape contractor/developer upon receipt of plant material. These certificates shall be made available to KC DOES as requested by the inspector. • Plant materials shall be locally grown (Western WA, Western OR, or Western BC), healthy. bushy. in vigorous growing condition, and be guaranteed true to size, name and variety. If replacement of plant material is necessary due to construction damage or plant failure within three (3) years of installation, the si'zes, species and quantities shall be equal to specified plants as indicated on the approved plans. • Plants shall be nursery grown, well-rooted of normal growth and hab;t, and free from disease or Infestation. KC DOES reserves the right to require replacement or substitution of any plants deemed unsuitable. • Trees shall have uniform branching, single straight trunks and the central leader Intact and undamaged. Balled and burlapped stock shall have been root-pruned at least once within the previous two years, and the plant stock shall have been grown in a container for at least one full growi'ng season. Container stock shall be fully rooted but not root-bound. Plant material wHh damaged root zones or broken root balls will not be accepted. • Coniferous trees shall be nursery grown, full and bushy, and with uniform branching and a natural non-sheared form. Original central leader must be healthy and undamaged. •Landscape contractor/developer shall submit a list of plant supplier names, addresses, phone numbers and storage/growing location of the material to KC ODES prior to planting. SUBSTITUTIONS. • Substitutions of specified plant species, si'ze or condition will be allowed only with prior written appraval tram KC DOES. PART 3 -PLANT INSTALLATION SOIL PREPARA T/ON/AMENDMENTS . • Prior to Installation of plantings, all construction debris and any other non-native material shall be removed from the mitigation area. Trees and shrubs shall be pit planted as shown In the approved pion details. A soil moisture retention agent (polymer) shall be Included in planting backfill per manufacturer's specification. • In non-graded planting areas, planting pits shall be backfilled with a 50/50 mixture of imported, weed free topsoil and the native so,1 from the planting pit. In graded areas, plantings shall be installed directly into newly placed topso11. Imported topsoil shall be a 3-way mix acquired from an approved local supplier. • Soi/Moist, or equivalent, shall be added to the topsoil backfill of all planting pits. The Sol/Moist shall be hydrated before bei'ng added to topsoil backfill. Manufacturers recommended application rates and usage shall be followed. • Woody plantings shall be fertilized with a slow release (B month) high nitrogen, low phosphorus granular fertilizer (21-3-7), with application rates as specified by the manufacturer. Fertillzer shall be applied after planting pit is backfilled, and prior to application of mulch. Fertilizer shall not be applied between November and March. • Outside of wetland areas, a 3 inch layer of mulch (medium Doug Fir bark) shall be placed around the base of each new tree to a 36» diameter for erosion, weed control and moisture retention. • Existing natural or landscaped areas that are damaged during construction shall be restored to their original condition, unless i'mprovements or modifications are specified for those areas. • Landscape con tractor /developer shall exercise care to protect from Injury to trunk, roots, or branches of any trees or shrubs that are to remain. Any living woody plant that is damaged during construction shall be treated within 24 hours of occurrence. Contractor shall prune wounded portions of plant immediately after damage occurs. lnj.Jred plants shall be thoroughly watered and additional measures shall be taken ( as appropriate) to aid in plant survivability. Grading: The duff layer and native topsoil shall be retained in an undisturbed state to the maximum extend practicable. Any duff layer or topso,1 removed during grading shall be stockp11ed on-site in a designated, controlled area not adjacent to public resources and critical areas. The material shall be reapplied to other portions of the site where feasible. Areas that have been cleared and graded shall hove the so,1 moisture holding capacity restored to that of the original undisturbed soil native to the site to the maximum extent practicable. The soil in any area that has been compacted or that has had some or all of the duff layer or underlying topsoil removed shall be amended to mitigate for lost moisture-holding capacity. The amendment shall take place between May 1 and October 1. Replaced topsoil shall be a minimum of 8 Inches thick, unless the applicant demonstrates that a different thickness will provide conditions equivalent to the so;/ moisture ho/ding capacity native to the site. Replaced topsol1 shaft have an organic matter content of between 8 to 13 percent dry weight and a pH suitable for the proposed landscape plants. CLEAN UP • Landscape con tractor /developer shall be responsible for the removal of construction material and debri's on the site following Installation of plant materials. All debris must be removed to a legal landfill facility. PART 4 -PLANT WARRANTY AND MONITORING • Landscape contractor/developer's warranty shall include replacement of plants (same size and species shown on the approved plans) that prove either to be mlslocated or unsuitable as to plant material standards. Except for loss due to excessively severe climatological conditions (substantiated by 10 -year recorded weather charts), Installed plant material are required to be guaranteed for three years against defects and unsatisfactory growth. Plants replaced shall be reinltiated under plant guarantee conditions. The monitoring period shall be three (3) years from installation acceptance In writing by the DOES Inspector. PART 5 -FINAL ACCEPTANCE • Upon completion of planting, the landscape contractor/developer shall provide the DOES Inspector with a set of clearly marked prints designating the actual locations of plantings within the miUgation area. Landscape contractor /developer shall keep a complete set of prints at the job site during construction for the purpose of 'red lining' changes or modifications to the approved plans and shall update said information on a daily basis. • KC ODES shall approve planting locations as depicted on the approved replanting plan. If items are to be corrected a punch list shall be prepared by the DOES Inspector and submitted to the Landscape contractor/developer for completion. After punch list items have been completed, ODES Inspector shall review the project for final acceptance of plan implementation. • AS BUILT SUBMITTAL ON PLATS Note: If revisions and/or changes have been made to the initial DOES approved slgniflcan t tree retention plan submit an As-Bw1t plan. If no changes/revisions have been made an As-Built Plan Is not required. Prior to final plat inspection for the Significant Tree Retention Plan permittee shall submit an AS-BUILT Significant Tree Retention Plan to the ODES Inspector showing all plan revisions/changes and verifying that the DOES approved Significant Tree Retention plan (approved at the ODES Engi'neering Review stage) has been completed per plan requirements. This AS-BUILT plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Site Development Specialist/forester that It conforms to S0-220 and can be recorded. If approved the plan will be sent back to the DOES Inspector for final plat inspection processing. Mitigation monitoring for Significant Tree shall commence upon acceptance and approval of this AS-BUil T plan and last for 3 years or growing seasons. SE 1/ 4, SE 1/ 4, SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23N., RANGE 5E., W.M. MARTIN PROPERTY Significant Tree Retention Notes & Details Project Number: LOSPOO 19 Parcel Number: I 023059383 PART 6 -MAINTENANCE AND CONVGENCY Note: lf street tree's to be planted also qualify for significant tree's then the street tree maintenance and monitoring process shall be used. • Maintenance will be performed twice per year to address any conditions that could jeopard1'ze the success of the mitigation area. Established performance standards for the project will be compared to the monitoring results to j.Jdge the success of the mitigation project. If there Is a significant problem with achieving the performance standards, the bond holder shall work with KC DOES to develop a contingency plan. Cont,'ngency plans can include, but are not limited to: regrading, additional plant installation. erosion control, mediations to hydrology, and plant substitutions of type, size, quantity and location. Such contingency plan shall be submitted to the KC ODES Inspector by December 31 of any year when deficiencies are discovered. Contingency will i'nc/ude many of the items listed below and would be implemented if these performance standards are not met. Maintenance and remedial action on the site will be implemented immediately upon completion of the monitoring event (unless otherwise specifically Indicated below). • During year one, two and three replace all dead plant material. • Water all plantings at a rate of 1" of water at least every week between June 15 - September 15 during the first year after installation, and for the first year after any replacement plantings (C & M). • Replace dead plants with the same species or a substitute species that meets the goal and objectives of the enhancement plan, subject to KC ODES approval. • Re-plant area after reason for failure has been identified (e.g., moisture regime, poor plant stock, disease, shade/sun conditions, wildlife damage, etc). • Remove/control weedy or exotic Invasive plants (e.g., Scot's broom, reed canary grass, Himalayan blackberry, purple loosestrife, etc.) by manual or chemical means as approved by KC ODES. Use of herbicides or pesticides within the mitigation area would only be Implemented If other measures failed or were considered unllkely to be successful, and would require prior KC DOES approval. Trees and shrubs should be weeded to the dripflne and mulched to a depth of 3 Inches. All non-native vegetation must be removed and dumped off site at an approved location. • Clean-up trash and other debris. • Selectively prune woody plants to thin and remove dead or diseased portion of trees. PART 7 -PERFORMANCE BOND • To assure the success of the mitigation, a performance bond will be posted with KC ODES by the Developer at the time of plat approval for the cost of implementing the mitigation plan to be monitored for three (J) years. lt will be the Developer / permittee responsibility to request a final inspection at the end of the three (3) year monitoring period and to release the posted bond. The bond quan tlty calculation form for both existing significant trees and trees to be planted shall be completed and submitted to DDES Site Development Services prior to approval of the Significant Tree Retention Plan (the bond form w/11 be provided by the SDS Forester at the time of the Significant Tree Retention plan review stage). The actual bond will need to be submitted to DOES prior to project acceptance for field inspection by the Land Use Inspection Unit. Note: The Significant Tree Retention Plan shall include depiction of tree planting details with written planting Installation notes. Street trees shall be pravided as fallows (per KCRS 5.03 and KCC 2/A.16.050): • Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. • Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road standards, unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. • Jf King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. • The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the county hos adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. • The species of trees shall be approved by DOES if located within the right-of-way, and shall not Include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that i's not compatible with overhead utility lines (see list of acceptable trees above). • The street tree plan shall be reviewed and approved by the DOES project review engineer In coordi'nation with the ODES Forester if comb1'ned with the Significant Tree Retention Plan. • The street trees must be installed and Inspected or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be Installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a ma1'ntenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the ma1'ntenance bond may be released ofter ODES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. Submittal Date: 6/29/07 "' NOTE, TREES S' TALL AND Sl-!Of<TER DO NOT REQUIRE TREE ST AKES UNLES6 NOT=D OTI-IEFa!JISE Pl<EVAILING WIND FLAN NOTE, .,--''cc:::---TREE ST AKE -'~-ROOT6ALL ig---/--TRUNK ',,-:::_ __ TREE STAKE FLANT TREES I" 1-!IGI-IER TI-IAN DEFTI-I GROIJ.N IN NUl<,SER'T' TREE FIT SI-IALL ElE NOT LESS TI-IAN 2 TIMES ROOT6ALL DIA, WATER Tl40ROIJG,l,lL Y AFTER FLANTING TREE ST AKES F'ERFENDICULAR TO Pl<EVAILING WIND "-----12 GA WIRE, TWIST TO TIGI-ITEN -----112" DIA ElLACK RUElElER 1-!0SE TYF. :--=:===2" x 2" CEDAR STAKES ;... CUT ALL TIES AND FOLD ElACK ElU~AF AND ElAeKET R'<ct1 UFFER l/3 OF ROOTElALL. REMOVE ALL FLASTIC AND TWIN!: _,,.---2" MULOI LAYER SI-IALL Ell: COMFOST _,,---3" UJAT=RING ElASIN c,ni.µ,r-ffi="'----sF'EclFIED SOIL MIX AND FEf<TILIZl:R ~+-----RECOMFACTED NATIVE SOIL 4" 2X MIN DIA. ROOT6ALL TYPICAL CONIFEROUS TREE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE z r: l;i ' "1 .. • Q ' "' Pl<EVAILING WIND FLAN NOTE, TREl=S &' TALL AND SI-IORTER DO NOT fsEQUIRE TfsEE STAKES UNLES6 NOTED OTI-IEFa!JISE ,,.J''.c:::---TREE STAKE -'~-ROOTElALL '-+--TF<UNK ',,-:::_ __ TfsEE STAKE NOTE, FLANT TfsEES I" 1-!IGI-IER TI-IAN DEFTI-I GRO\l.N IN NUf<.5ER'T' TREE FIT SI-IALL NOT ElE LES6 TI-IAN /2! TIMES ROOT ElALL DIAMET=R TREE STAKES F'ERFENDICULAR TO FREVAILING WIND -----211 x 211 CEDAR STAKES -----12 GA WIRE, TWIST TO TIGf.lTEN -----112" DIA ElLACK RUElEll:R 1-!0SE TYF. ----CUT ALL TIES AND FOLD ElACK ElU~AF FROM UFFER l/3 OF ROOT ElALL. REMOVE ALL FLASTIC AND TWIN!: _,,----2" MULCI-I LAYER 61-iALL ElE COMFOST 3" WAT=R ElA51N l±;,-;J:!"'-~-scARIFY SIDES AND ElOTTOM OF FLANTING FIT TO ALLOW FOR ROOT FENETRATION '-----SF!:CIFIED SOIL MIX AND Fl=f<TILIZl:R '-----RECOMFACTED NATIVE SOIL 4" 2X MIN DIA ROOT6ALL TYPICAL DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING NOT TO SCALE FIRE I-IYDRANT OR UTILITY FOLE SIDEWALK NEXT TO VERTICAL CURB \, Se>' MIN. le>' MIN. ALLEYWAY DRIVEWAY IS' MIN. LUMINAIRE ~ =cv· I • le>' MIN'!,.k-S_e>_' _M_IN_.-,1" ._, VERTICAL cu~ LINE AT INT!:F<S!:CTION CAUUQN NOTE 1.-...., NOTE&, + a../ '--.,.,./ PLANTING 5TRIF FLAN I. TREE& 51-!ALL GENERALLY 6E PLANTED 6ACK OF Tl-IE SIDEWALK PLANTING 5TRIF5 WILL 6E AFFROVED ONLY A& FART OF A LAND5CAFING FLAN IN WI-IICI-I PLANT MAINTENANCE, COMFATl61LITY WITI-I UTILITIES, AND TRAFFIC SAFETY ARE DULY CONSIDERED. 2. IF PLANTING 5TRIF5 ARE APPROVED, A. MIN. DISTANCE FROM CENTER OF ANY TREE TO NEAREST EDGE OF VERTICAL CURB 51-!ALL 6E 4 FEET. e. TREE& 51-!ALL eE STAKED IN A MANNER NOT TO 065TRUCT SIDEWALK TRAFFIC. C. IN CASE OF 6LOCK-OUT5, MIN. CLEAR SIDEWALK WIDTI-I 51-!ALL 6E S FEET IN RESIDENTIAL OR 8 FEET IN 6U51NE55 DISTRICT&. 3. &EE &EC. S£l3. STREET TREE STANDARD PER KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARD 5-009 NOT TO SCALE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTIUTIES SHOWN IS APPROX/MA TE AND MAY NOT BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONS/BIUTY TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION KING COUNTY D.D.E.S. a&.4-i~""-~ R~e-vi-ew-ineer OF UTIUTIES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. YOU MUST CALL 1-800-424-5555 NOT LESS THAN TWO FULL BUSINESS DA l'S BEFORE BEGINNING EXCAVATION WHERE ANY UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES MAY BE LOCATED. FAILURE TO DO SO COULD MEAN BEARING SUBSTANTIAL REPAIR COSTS, JAMES H. SANDERS. P .E. DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER Comments: "'!· 1/·CJJ> Completion Date t;!1i. Approval Date © 2007 TRIAD ASSOCIATES \. T ASSOCIATES 12112115thAve. NE Kirkland, WA 98034-6929 425.821.8448 425.821.3481 fax 800.488.0756 toll free www.triadassoc.com Land Development Consulta11ts GERALD F. BUCK, AICP PROJECT MANAGER NICK A. Y1NGER, PLS PROJECT SURVEYOR RICK A. TOMKINS. PE PROJECT ENGINEER MEI-SH/OU LIN, ASLA PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCH!TllCT FIRST SUBMITTAL DATE: 6/29/07 SCALE: HORIZ.: t'-40' VKRT.:N/A STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHI ECT • MEI-SHIOU LIN CE TIFICATE NO. 826 STAIIP NOT VAIJD UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED JOB NO. 04-257 SHEET NO. l5ov5 I :1 ,, i I i !• ' ' i . ! I I I I I I I I NOTES * ALL EXISTING STRUCTIJRES ON SI TE ARE TO BE REMOVED * OFF SITE PARCEL LINES, BUILDINGS 1k WETLAND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPRO/MA TE I I I ! .. I I DATUM ' ,~ .,,. ( -.,./ .. ..------_\ /' ,\ ... '•• "" , .. '··"'-· ',. -·I .,. ' ' ' VER77CAL-NA VD 88 / HOR/Z. NAO 83/91 BENCHMARK CITY OF RENTON SURVEY CONTROL NETWORK MONUMENT #1852 3• BRASS SURFACE MONUMENT FOUND ' ' AT THE CORNER OF NE 4TH STREET(SE 128TH ST.) AND 148TH A VE SE EL.=454. 78' "TBM A• SET RR SPIKE IN W. FACE OF UTILITY POLE • \ \ . 8' ABOVE GRADE EAST SIDE OF 148TH A YI: SE EL.=484.7' SE 1/4, SE 1/4, SEC. 10, TWP. 23N. RGE. SE., W.M. r '/ I I I I ' / J ,··· ' . \ . )-, ... I 10 15 .. TBM A• ScT RR S IKE IN :-FAC/i-.. Of' .. v.nu POI£ , 0,8' ABO'f' Gli'ADEJ''· --...................... ,, ...... ; EL.=484. 7' ! i • l. i I I ' I i I I L I i ' ...... ··-·= .-.... J __ --~--·-····l. I. :g SE CORNER, NE 1/4, SE 1/4, SE 1/4, SEC 10 KING COUNTY itri;'\i,'m ~ ~OO ~,,: --~<1sl!'.'¥.) -·-·(r,fil~----r_,;'(.,Y"'"'!/ '" ~titW-··- 1 CITY OF RENTON I I • i ..... ,.. .... .. I . .... ""~·-·· ··=·-·-····••o, ··-... -................. , ... , .... _, I I Iii FOUND PUNCH MARK IN 3" BRASS SURFACE MON. , 07-26-01 111 ; • I ,----14 ; ' i BASIS OF BEARING LEGAL DESCRIPTION HORIZ. NAO 83/91 CITY OF RENTON GPS CONTROL NETWORK HOLDING CITY OF RENTON MONUMENTS C.O.R.l/1851(BASE POINT) AND C.O.R.#1852 THE FIELD MEASUREMENTS FOR THIS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY WERE OBTAINED UTILIZING GLOBAL POSITION/NG SYSTEM (GPS) SURVEY TECHNIQUES USING LE/CA SR 9500 EQUIPMENT. COORDINATES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS DRAWING ARE PROJECT COORDINATES WHICH MAY BE CONVERTED TO STA TE PLANE GRID COORDINATES BY SUBTRACT/NG 100,000 METERS {328,083.3333 FEET), THEN MUL TIPL l1NG BY THE A Yl:RAGE COMBINED FACTOR OF (0.9999823034), THE INITIAL COORDINATE CONVERSION WAS PERFORMED USING THE LE/CA SKI-PRO PROGRAM VERSION 2. 0 2000. PRIMARY CONTROL POINTS AND ACCESSIBLE MONUMENT POSITIONS WERE FIELD MEASUREO UTILIZING GLOBAL POSITION/NG SYSTEM (GPS) SURVEY TECHNIQUES USING LE/CA SR 9500 EQUIPMENT. MONUMENT POSl710NS THAT WERE NOT DIRECTLY OBSERVED USING GPS SURVEY TECHNIQUES WERE 7/ED INTO THE CONTROL POINTS UTILIZING LE/CA ELECTRONIC TOTAL STA 7/0NS FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF BOTH ANGLES AND DISTANCES. THIS SURVEY MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE STANDARDS SET BY WAC 332-130-090. PER LAND AMERICA TRANSNA TION TITLE REPORT ORDER NO. CS-20096926, DA TED OCTOBER 20, 2004 AT 8: 00 AM • THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST. W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 16 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THE EAST 150 FEET THEREOF; AND THE SOUTH 14 FEET OF THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE EAST 150 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10; EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND ROAD PURPOSES OVER THE NORTH 16 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF SITIJA TE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STA TE OF WASHINGTON. \ '{\-- ""' 4,,,,, }--1-:-r/ ~~ ~ ~9001 ~--> ' , 'l.V l,AY VALL>._r "< -· <",,_, Y OUNIY PARK -1'" ''I, "' r ,,.o Cl I I "v / ~ I bi S's ~ I -,"'Qu I ~ SF !16th sr " i ,s SE 117th I '" -'" '" 1sr c, 900 ' "' " 'l! i ) 'l! -(/~\ '" ' bi "( Ci " 's' " 5£ 120th -·······~·-···· le 'le C, I " 0 ST ~ "' I --- le " I le ·-~ ,, SF c~~1,{f(¥;!: ::~ :;; "' -124{h ~ ~ I ~~~ ~ ~ ,)f 2:1 -~~if1~ ' ' ..... "' ,_ "' ~ s PARK /-4 5 ~ " ~ : if & I NE 4th ST RID£ -SITE I ' ~ , ... ,~.ark ii, i .. I ~ S[ IJ2nd ST 'le I "' ~ ' St I.JJrd er "' --.c: ' ,: "" -'SI-~ - -'SI-,_ -Pofk;::1; ~ I I i. liir · ·· ' I VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE ' SITE INFORMATION OWNER: DEVELOPER: ENG/NEER/SUR~EYOR: I SECTION/TOWNSHIP/RANGE: EXIS77NG ZONIN,;: AREA: NUMBER OF LOT:.:: NUMBER OF Otr,;LING /1NITS: PROPOSED USE• AVERAGE LOT c!ZE: ALLOWED DENSITY: PROPOSED DENJITY: RECREATION AR~A: RECREATION AREA CALCULATION MIN. RECREA T/ON AREA REQUIRED: RECREATION 'AREA PROVIDED WITHIN TRACT A: MIN. REQ'D RE~EA TION PERIMETER ON R.0, W.: ' RECREATION PEflMETER ON R. 0. W. PROVIDED: SEWAGE D/SPOiAL: WA TER SUPPL Yi FIRE DISTRICT: \ SCHOOL DISTR/lf T: TELEPHONE SEI/VICE: ' POWER SOURCE; DRAINAGE BAs,p: DRAINAGE SUBIBAS/N I WETLAND LINE TYPE LEGEND: MARTIN KENNETH A 9720 NE 120TH PLACE. SUITE 100 KIRKLAND, WA 98034 (425) 825-1955 CAMWEST REAL ESTA TE DEVELOPMENT. INC. 9720 NE 120TH PLACE, SUITE 100 KIRKLAND, WA 98034 ( 425) 825-1955 CONTACT: SARA SLATTEN TRIAD ASSOC/A TES 12112 115TH A VE NE KIRKLAND, WA 98034 (425) 821-8448 CONTACT: GERRY BUCK SE 1/4, SE 1/4, SEC, 10, TWP. 23N. RGE. SE., W.M. R-4 161,784 SF (3. 71 ACRES) 13 13 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED ± 7691 SF 4 UNITS PER ACRE 13 -;-3, 71 = 3,5 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE 9752 SF (22 AC) 13 LOTS. X 390 SF = 5,070 SF {0.12 AC) 9,752 SF {0.22 AC) 427 LF X 10% = 43 LF 214 LF {50%) CITY OF RENTON KING COUNTY DISTRICT 90 CITY OF RENTON, DISTRICT #25 ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT GTE NORTHWEST PUGET SOUND ENERGY CEOAR RIVER MAY CREEK -· -• -~ , -• -WETLAND BOUNDARY • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ~~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • WETLAND · BUFFER -----.-----75' WETLAND BUFFER BU/LO/NG SETBACK LINE SHEET li'IDEX I 2 :~:~:~:~~~~ ~~DING AND UTILITY PLAN I K.C. D.D.E.S. SCALE: 1 " = 100' 0 50' 100' 200' ~ L05POO!Cj © 2005 TRIAD ASSOCIATES ··--------·--·-·---~ -~'"---· " T ASSOCIATES - 12112115thAve. NE Kirkland, WA 98034~6923 425.821.8448 425.821.3481 fax 800.488.0756 toll free www.triadassoc.com laqd Development Consultan'ts GERALD F. BUCK, A/CP PROJECT MANAGER NICK A. YINGER, PLS PROJECT SURVEYOR REBECCA S. CUSHMAN, PE PROJECT ENGINEER JEFFREY L. COX, ASLA PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FIRST SUBMITTAL DATE: 9/28/05 SCALE: HORIZ.: 1"=100' V!RT.:N/A STAMP NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED JOB NUMBER 04-257 SHEET NUMBER 1oF2 _-,~. PLAT Of SHAMROCK ,., .,. I ···········! . i ;:._· j __ , -· --~\ ·--·-----·--~ -.. ~- -----"--···. \ \ . "• _____ ,, .... ,•'" '., -"---...• ----···--·----·~--. ! ,/ ' \ ' TRACT C DETE:NTION ,--MWS--.. --------- ,<\ ---, I '·, I --~----------- SE 1/4, "~~·;:,_.· .. •,,• . -. -- ' SE 1/4, \1 \I I ,, 'I r' .... )'. ----\--·--- I I I I I . -·~,- ' ,o' \ \ ', "'·- .,,,.,, .... SEC. \ ' . 1 ' I 10, TWP. PLAT Of SHAMROCK , __ ,--,, . \ 13 \ \ 23N. • • ' PROPOSED STORM ORA/NA Gt (TYP) \ 12 ,, 11 ' TRACT D JOINT USE DRI_VEWAY ., ' , ., .. \ \ • ' ' . " .,.~· ~---1 MORGAN PLAC.E'. VOL. 205, PG( SJ 58-77 RGE. ; 5E., W.M. \ \ ' ,., \ \ 6 ,7 ' . \ \ • \ \ \ \ \ ' , .... , ... , .... :~ \~RJg;J~~o(;:5 ' · · '\\ '. :, , · t . :r--....:.~.::.:::.::.:....~~--....:.,_ ____ .1' -I -~\~:, \ PROPO;ED, SEWER MANHOLE TYP ·,o...._ ', \ \ \, 10 \ 9 \ \ / / / ···= ·---- ~ ,.- , . ,.,. , ,----1 ,J I 8 \ \ \ "" ~ ·-. ,/ ,/ \ \ \ ,c( \ / ' ' ' ' r---___ ,- L, 1 j ,, SCALE: 1" -40' . -· .. ----·------" 0 "TBM A • SET RR SPIKE IN W. FACE OF UTILITY POLE 0,8' ABOVE GRADE EL-484.7' © 2005 TRIAD ASSOCIATES '\. T ASSOCIATES 12112 115th Ave. NE Kirkland, WA 98034-6923 425.821.8448 425.821.3481 fax 800.488.0756 toll free www.triadassoc.com Lang Development Cnnsultr1nts ' GERALD F. BUCK, AICP PROJECT MANAGER NICK A. YING£R, PLS PROJECT SURVEYOR REBECCA S. CUSHMAN, PE PROJECT ENGINEER JEFFREY L. COX, ASL.A PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FIRST SUBMITTAL DATE: 9/28/05 SCALE: HO!UZ.: 1"=40' vm.:N/A EXPIRES: 11/15/05 STAMP NOT VAIJD UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED JOB NUMBER 04-257 -----------------------"-, I f SHEET NUMBER 2oF2