Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Report 02
. JLIU & AS§OCIATES9 INC. Geotechnical Engineering Mr.Bob Holm Bob Holm Company 4905 -200th Street SE Bothell, WA 98012 Dear Mr. Holm: Engineering Geology November 10, 2008 Subject: Geotechnical Investigation and Recommendations · Plat of Pleasant Path 12204-148th Avenue SE Renton, Washington L&A Job No. 8A098 INTRODUCTION Earth Science We have completed a geotechnical investigation for the site of the subject plat, located at the above address in the unincorporated King County, Washington, just east of the city limits of Renton. The general location of the project site is shown on Plate 1 -Vicinity Map. Over most of the eastern two thirds of the site is a wetland and its buffer zones. We understand that the proposed development for the site is to plat the western portion of the site outside of the wetland buffer zone into eight single-family residential building lots. .The site is bounded by 148th Avenue SE to its west and adjoined by residential developments on the other sides. The building lots of the subject plat will be accessed from 148th Avenue SE via a short roadway with a cul-de- sac tum-round in the middle of the to-be-developed western portion of the site and a driveway from the cul-de-sac to the southern lots. A stormwater detention vault is to be located near the southwest comer of the site to store storm runoff collected over the impervious surfaces of the proposed development of the site. 19213 Kenlake Place NE · Kenmore, Washington 98028 Phone (425) 483-9134 · Fax (425) 486-2746 November JO, 2008 Plat of Pleasant Path L&A Job No. 8A098 Page2 The purpose of this investigation is to characterize the subsurface conditions of the site and provide geotechnical recommendations for the design of the roadway and driveway and the stormwater detention vault. We did not conduct subsurface exploration on the site with test pits or test borings. Instead, this geotechnical investigation is based on the geologic and soil conditions shown on a published geologic map and our experiences of previous projects in the general area of the subject plat site. Presented in this report are our findings of the subsurface conditions and our recommendations. SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE CONDITIONS The subject plat site is situated on· the top of a broad, gentle to very-gentle, westerly to southwesterly declining slope flanking the western fringe of a broad, southeasterly trending highland. A wetland traverses roughly south-southeasterly through the middle of the site. As shown on Plate 2 -Site and Plat Plan, the terrain within the site generally slopes down very gently at 2 to 8 percent grade from its east boundary westward towards the wetland, and again from the wetland towards its west boundary. The site is currently occupied by a single-family residence with a separate garage and a work shop within the northwestern quadrant of the site. We understand these existing structures will be demolished for the proposed development of the site. The area surrounding the existing structures is cleared and covered with sporadic grass. The eastern portion of the site is dotted with young deciduous trees and covered with dense underbrush. GEOLOGIC SETTING AND SOIL CONDITIONS The Geologic Map of the Renton Quadrangle. King County. Washington, by D.R. Mullineaux, . published by U. S. Geological Survey in 1965, was referenced for the geologic and soil · lLJIU & ASSOCIATES, JINC. · November 10, 2008 Plat of Pleasant Path L&A Job No. 8A098 Page3 conditions of the subject plat site. According to this publication, the surficial soil unit at and in the vicinity of the site is mapped as Ground Moraine (Qgt), as shown on Plate 3 -Geologic Map. The geology of the Puget Sound Lowland has been modified by the advance and retreat of several glaciers in the past and subsequent deposits and erosion. The latest glacier advanced to the Puget Sound Lowland is referred to as the Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation, which has occurred during the later stages of the Pleistocene Epoch and retreated from the region some 14,500 years ago. The ground moraine soil unit is composed of a thin layer of ablation till over lodgmont till, deposited by Puget glacial lobe of the Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation. The underlying lodgmont till is generally a compact mixture of unsorted clay, silt, sand, gravel and cobble, commonly referred to as "hard pan". The surficial ablation till is similar to lodgmont till, but is much less compact and coherent. The thickness generally varies from 2 to 4 feet for the ablation till deposit, and 5 to 30 feet for the lodgmont till deposit. The lodgmont till deposit is practically impervious, except local lenses of sand and gravel. It has a compressive strength comparable to that of low-grade concrete and can stand in steep natural or cut slopes for a long period. The lodgmont till can provide excellent foundation support with little settlement expected. The overlying ablation till is generally in a looser state, and is more compressible and permeable. GROUNDWATER CONDITION The very-dense, weakly-cemented lodgmont till deposit underlying the site at shallow depth is of extremely low permeability, and would perch stormwater infiltrating into the more permeable surficial soils. The amount of and. the depth to this near-surface ·perched groundwater would fluctuate seasonally, depending on precipitation, surface runoff, ground vegetation cover, site L][U & ASSOCKA. TES, INC. November 10, 2008 Plat of Pleasant Path L&A Job No. 8A098 Page4 utilization, and other factors. The perched groundwater may dry up completely during the dryer summer months and accwnulate and rise in the wet winter months. DISCUSSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL The to-be-developed area in the western portion of the site is most likely mantled by a thin layer of topsoil, underlain by a layer of ablation till of mediwn-dense silty sand to about 2 to 3 feet deep, which is in turn underlain by a lodgmont till deposit of very-dense, weakly-cemented, gravelly, silty sand with occasional cobble. The to-be-developed area is gently to very-gently sloped. The underlying very-dense lodgmont till soils are of very-high shear strength and are capable of providing excellent foundation support to the proposed stormwater detention vault and the residential buildings to be constructed on the site. Conventional footing foundations constructed on or into the lodgmont till soils may be used to support the stormwater detention vault and the buildings. SITE PREPARATION AND GENERAL GRADING Vegetation should be cleared and grubbed within construction limits and should be preserved and maintained beyond construction limits. Topsoil and loose to mediwn-dense ablation till soils in the to-be-developed areas of the site should be completely stripped down to the very-dense lodgmont till soils within building pads of the building lots, and topsoil and the unsuitable soils in the root zone should be stripped down to the medium-dense ablation soils and/or the lodgmont till soils within the paved roadway/driveway. Fill, if required for grading, should be constructed on proof-rolled, unyielding, undisturbed, firm native soils following the stripping of the surficial unsuitable soils. LIU & ASSOC:e:A TES, INC. November 10, 2008 Plat of Pleasant Path L&A Job No. 8A098 Page 5 SEISMIC HAZARD AND DESIGN CONSIDERATION The Puget Sound region is in an active seismic zone. The subject site is underlain at shallow depth by very-dense lodgmont till soils of very-high shear strength. There is a lack of continuous, extensive, static groundwater table at shallow depth under the site. The site is generally gently to very-gently sloped. The combination of the above makes it rather unlikely for seismic haz.ards, such as landslides, liquefaction or soil lateral spreading, to occur on the site during strong earthquakes. Therefore, the seismic hazard of the site should be minimal. The residential buildings to be constructed on the site, however, should be designed to withstand seismic forces induced by strong earthquakes. Based on the soil conditions encountered by the test pits, it is our opinion that Seismic Use Group I and Site Class D should be used in the seismic desigri of the proposed residences in accordance with the 2006 International Building Code(IBC). EXCAVATION AND FILL SLOPES Under no circumstance should excavation slopes be steeper than the limits specified by local, state and federal safety regulations if workers have to perform construction work in excavated areas. Unsupported temporary cuts greater than 4 feet in height should be no steeper than lH:1 V in topsoil and ablation till soils, and no steeper than 1/2H: 1 V in the underlying lodgrnont till soils. Permanent cut banks should be no steeper than 2H: 1 V in topsoil and ablation till soils, and no steeper than 1-l/4H:1V in the underlying very-dense lodgmont till soils. The soil units and the stability of cut slopes should be observed and verified by a geotechnical engineer during excavation. Permanent fill embankments required to support structural or traffic load should be constructed with compacted structural fill placed over undisturbed, proof-rolled, firm, native, fresh_ tiH soils after the surficial unsuitable soils are completely stripped. Permanent fill to be placed over lLillJ & ASSOCIATES, INC. November I 0, 2008 Plat of Pleasant Path L&A Job No. 8A098 Page6 slopes steeper than 15 percent grade should be retained structurally. The exposed ground exceeding 20 percent grade should be benched with vertical steps not exceeding 4 feet tall after stripping of surficial unsuitable soils and prior to placing structural fill. The slope of permanent fill embankments should be no steeper than 2H:IV. Upon completion, the sloping face of permanent fill embankments should be thoroughly compacted to a non-yielding state with a hoe- pack. The above recommended cut and fill slopes are under the assumption that groundwater seepage would not be encountered during construction. If groundwater is encountered, the construction work should be immediately halted and the slope stability re-evaluated. The slopes may have to be flattened and other measures taken to stabilize the slopes. Stormwater should not allowed to flow uncontrolled over cut and fill slopes. Permanent cut slopes or fill embankments should be seeded and vegetated as soon as possible for erosion protection and long-term stability, and should be covered with clear plastic sheets, as required, to protect them from erosion until the vegetation is fully established. STRUCTURAL FILL Structural fill is the fill that supports structural or traffic load. Structural fill should consist of clean granular soils free of organic, debris and other deleterious substances and with particles not larger than three inches. Structural fill should have a moisture content within one percent of its optimum moisture content at the time of placement. The optimum moisture content is the water content in the soils that enable the soils to be compacted to the highest dry density for a given compaction effort. Onsite clean silty sand to gravelly sand soils, meeting the above requirements, may be used as · structural fill. Imported material. to be used as structural fill should be clean, free-draining, JLJ[lU & ASSOCJ[ATE§, INC. -·· November 10, 2008 Plat of Pleasant Path L&A Job No. 8A098 Page 7 granular soils containing no more than 5 percent by weight finer than the No. 200 sieve based on the fraction of the material passing No. 4 sieve, and should have individual particles not larger than three inches. The ground over which structural fill is to be placed should be prepared in accordance with recommendations in the SITE PREPARATION AND GENERAL GRADING and EXCAVATION AND FILL SLOPES sections of this report. Structural fill should be placed in lifts no more than 10 inches thick in its loose state, with each lift compacted to a minimum percentage of the maximum dry density determined by ASTM D1557 (Modified Proctor Method) as follows: Application Within building pads and under foundations · Roadway/driveway subgrade Retaining/foundation wall backfill Utility trench backfill STORMWATERDETENTIONVAULT % of Maximum Dry Density 95% 95% for top 3 feet and 90% below 92% 95% for top 4 feet and 90% below An underground concrete detention vault is to be constructed near the southwest corner of the site to store stormwater collected over impervious surfaces of the proposed development of the site. The bottom of the vault is to be at about 8 to 15 feet below the existing ground surface. At such depths, the vault pit would be excavated into the very-dense Jodgmont till deposit The vault may be supported on footings founded on the lodgmont till soils and an allowable soil bearing pressure of 4,000 psf may be used for the design of the vault footing foundations. JL][U & ASSOC][ATES, INC. November 10, 2008 Plat of Pleasant Path L&A Job No. 8A098 Page8 A drain line consisting of perforated, rigid PVC, drain pipe or slotted, corrugated ADS, drain pipe, at least 6 inches in diameter, should be installed at a few inches below bottom of the perimeter footings of the vault walls to intercept and drain away groundwater which may flow towards the vault. The drain line should have sufficient slope (0.5% mmimum) to generate flow by gravity, and water collected in the drain line should be tightlined to discharge into a storm sewer line or a suitable stormwater disposal facility. The vault footing drain line should be completely embedded in. washed gravel wrapped in a layer· of non-woven filter fabric, such as 140N by Mirafi Inc. or approved equal. A vertical drainage blanket at least 12 inches thick horizontally, consisting of compacted pea gravel or washed gravel, should be placed against the perimeter vault walls. The remaining backfill behind the vertical drainage blanket should be constructed of structural fill. Alternatively, a vertical drain mat, such as Miradrain 6000 by Mirafi Inc. or equivalent, may be placed against the perimeter vault walls in lieu of the gravel vertical drainage blanket. The vertical drainage blanket or drain mat should be hydraulically connected to the drain line at the base of the vault perimeter walls. Sufficient number of cleanouts at strategic locations should be installed for periodical cleaning of the vault wall drain · line to prevent clogging. The perimeter walls of the detention vault would also serve as retaining walls to support cut banks and backfill. The perimeter vault walls capped with a lid would be restrained at their top from horizontal movement and should be designed for at-rest lateral soil pressure. For the condition that groundwater behind the perimeter vault walls can be fully drained by the drain line provided at the base of the walls, we recommend an at-rest soil pressure of 50 pcf equivalent fluid density (EFD) be used for the design of vault perimeter walls. · To counter the at-rest soil pressure, a passive lateral soil pressure of 375 pcf EFD may be used, except that the passive pressure within the top 12 inches of the finish subgrade should be ignored. The above passive pressure assumes the backslope of the walls is level or ascending away from the walls. The at- LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. November 10, 2008 Plat of Pleasant Path L&A Job No. 8A098 Page9 rest soil pressure may also be resisted by the friction force between the footings and the subgrade soils based on a coefficient of friction of0.55. If the site grades are such that it is not feasible to completely drain groundwater behind the. vault walls with a gravity drain line system, the hydrostatic pressure on the perimeter vault walls should also be taken into consideration for the design of the vault perimeter walls. For the condition that a perimeter drain line has to be placed higher than the footing level, the perimeter vault walls should be designed for a lateral soils pressure of 50 pcf EFD above the drain line level and a combined lateral soil and hydrostatic pressure of 80 pcf EFD below the drain line level. The above lateral pressures on the walls may be countered by a passive soil pressure of 375 pcfEFD above the drain line and 210 pcfEFD below. The detention vault should also be designed for seismic loading based on a 100-year seismic event. For seismic design of the detention vault walls, a pseudo static soil pressure diagram of inverted triangle from the finished ground level to the bottom of the foundations should be used. Based on the soil conditions in the detention vault area, we recommend the lateral soil pressure at the top of the triangle be 8H psf for a 100-year seismic event, where H is the height from finish grade on top of the vault to bottom of footings in feet. A one-third increase in the above recommended allowable soil bearing pressure may be used when considering the seismic loading condition. The above design parameters are unfactored ultimate values. Proper factors of safety should be applied for the design of the vault walls against sliding and overturning failures. LliU & ASSOCIATES, liNC. November 10, ·2008 Plat of Pleasant Path L&A Job No. 8A098 Page 10 PAVED ROADWAY/DRIVEWAY Performance of roadway/driveway pavement is critically related to the conditions of the underlying subgrade soils. We recommend that the subgrade soils under the roadway/driveway be treated and prepared as described in the SITE PREPARATION AND GENERAL EARTHWORK section of this report. Prior to placing base material, the subgrade soils should · be compacted to a non-yielding state with a vibratory roller compactor and proof-rolled with a piece of heavy construction. equipment, such as a fully-loaded . dump truck. Any areas with excessive flexing or pumping should be over-excavated and re-compacted or replaced with a structural fill or crushed rock placed· and compacted in accordance with the recommendations provided in the STRUCTURAL FILL section of this report. We recommend that a layer of compacted, 7/8-inch crushed rock base (CRB), be placed for the r_oadway/driveway. This crushed rock base should be at least 6 inches for the roadway off 148th Avenue SE and 4 inches for the driveway off the cul-de-sac end of the roadway. This crushed rock base may be reduced to a 2-to-3sinch layer of leveling course consisting of 7 /8-inch crushed rock if the roadway/driveway bases are cut into undisturbed, very~ense, lodgmont till soils .. This crushed rock base should be overlain with a 3-inch asphalt treated base (ATB) topped by a 2- inch-thick Class B asphalt concrete (AC) surficial course for the roadway and overlain with a 3- inch-thick Class B asphalt concrete (AC) surficial course for the private driveways. RISK EVALUATION STATEMENT The subject site is underlain at shallow depth by very-dense lodgmont till soils. These soils are of very-high shear strength and the site should be quite stable. It is our opinion that if the recommendations in this report are fully implemented and observed during construction and following the completion of construction, the areas disturbed by construction will be stabiliz.ed and will remain stable, and will not increase the potential for soil movement. In our opinion, the LID & ASSOCIATES, INC. November 10, 2008 Plat of Pleasant Path L&A Job No. 8A098 Page 11 risk for damages to the proposed development and from the development to adjacent properties from soil instability should be rninirnal. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for the specific application to this project for the exclusive use by Bob Holm Company and their associates, consultants and contractors. We recommend that this report, in its entirety, be included in the project contract documents for the information of the prospective contractors for their estimating and bidding purposes and for compliance with the recommendations in this report during construction. The conclusions and interpretations in this report, however, shoul.d not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. The scope of this inyestigation does not include subsurface. exploration of the site or services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in this report for design considerations. Our geotechnical recommendations are based on the geologic and soil conditions shown on the above-referenced geologic map, and our experience and engineering judgment. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty, expressed or irnplied,.is made. The actual subsurface conditions of the site may vary from those described in this report. The nature and extent of such variations may not become evident until constructiop. starts. If variations appear then, we should be retained to re-evaluate the recommendations of this report, and to verify or modify them in writing prior to proceeding further with the construction of the proposed development of the site. JLIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. November 10, 2008 Plat of Pleasant Path L&A Job No. 8A098 Page 12 CLOSURE We are pleased to be of service to you on this project. Please feel free to call us if you have any questions regarding this report or need further consultation. Three plates attached Yours very truly, LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. 4;6£'-:) J. S. (Julian) Liu, Ph.D., P.E. Consulting Geotechnical Engineer LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. . • -~E 124TH ST SE 125TH ST !j? --._ ... -SE 112TH SE~ 113TH .o ~ ~ ST ~ ~ ~ SE 114TH ST S£ 116™ ST 14000 SE 117TH ST SE > I.<) I18TH< vi ~ ST i= !l SE 120TH ST 15500 1 ST ST w w ~ ~ > > < < 6TH ST SE : t ' I SC ICfT>tJii:\ 11 4- SE 128TH ST ~ ~ 128TH ~ SE. ii! SE 129TH ~ Pl 2ND s, . IJJRD ST LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering · Engineering Geology · Earth Science w > < ST r i 14aoo SE 132ND ST SE 13 RD CT >I ""' I I I i=I ~, !!)1 I I -:,~DST ..:, q, > <( 14 SE i'= '° "' s ~, /;I SE 144Tll /;I > < ~ VICINITY MAP 15600 SE 131ST ~ SE 132HO SE PL 2 ::) . > SE < 38TH Pl X ,_ 139TH Pl §' SE 141ST ST g SE 142ND £'. w ST ~ > " ' 4._>to ' < ST !! w 144TH ~ 15900i=.,, 0/ ~· ~ c; PLAT OF PLEASANT PATH 12204-148TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WASHINGTON JOB NO. BA098 DATE 11/10/2008 PLATE _1_ I -···--· ' ' ' ~ghli .. "", ' ~· . I fi; ·-·--l>) ~ ~ LllIJ & ASSOCIATES, INC; Geotechnical Engineering · Engineering Geology · Earth Science GEOLOGIC MAP MAP PLAT OF PLEASANT PATH 12204 -148TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WASHINGTON JOB NO. ·8A098 DATE 11/10/2008 PLATE_]_ cxmuoED CURB :: 1 FOR 'iHEET ~ucrn,_:::~t:11 CVRB T IS w. . !A 30' " v 9 12 ~If/I'll.I UM/I.) IV DC. UC.LJIYll'i /C.U ( 2 \ BY ORANGE C0NSTRUCT70N FENCE \::../ 0R SILT FENCE (TrP.) FENCE 1.2' S0U1H OF FEN i: CROSSES ;-PROPERTY LINE ,_ 155.2 E'LY u'{t -,"-"'ROeeM CORNER FENCE 1.· PR ~ GON (:. PIPE Yi ~ ~;~:;;~~;,J'Lll 11 -s,c-: ; '"r: 0 -• w-, CT r ... , .~ .......... .o _;;>, i ,...,....,,..K CF Pl~OPUHY cor~NEH-\ . 1 / r~~()SCA>"E \ WAl.L ' \ i / ---_ 4'V8F Y ' ~--..;q, ~ ~ -I ~!I l FENCE ~:OHNEf'! l ... i"OUND HEBAR 'l,1TH Y[L.LOW...J :;1 0.2 • SOUTH Qt· I PLASnC ~AP "MEADE GILMAN & ASSOC. 29270/3243•'r/ P_ROPERTY LINE 3o i 3~)14~1/.'!16811" 0.1 SOUTH OF I 12 f PROPER TY COR ~ I 4'HWF .,~COVERED PATIO . : .. FENCE 0.6' ..J. or: Ff_ ,fJ# ·--~ 1S 20'x20' PA WA IF NJ£(}(JA Y REA/. . FOR 0/SP \ Of 8 \ . 0m LE.CEPi OE~IL~fII C2.J,(TYP/,, ROCK/CHt SE£(O£TA1 C2. ,Tf-{TYi @\ \ ' Project · SheetNo._of_· FL6)(' 1 &I h f'A\/eMGJr Q;~ftjfr!p. No. • J~:n:U & ASSOCKATES, KNC. . . Geotechnical Engineering • Engineering Geology • Earth Science PLP-1 Of-:: ftf:ASAtlT f'A11:l 19213 KENLAKE PLACE NE • KENMORE, WA 98028 --~---..----.--~-~~Job No &>AD "f S PHONE, (425> 483-9134 FAX, (425) 486-2746 .. ,z..72 I 4 · By ~$1.... Dato ';,If' 7 c, Ck'd by DESIGN CALCULATIONS ROADWAY FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT PLAT OF PLEASANT PATH 12204-148TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WASHINGTON \IBrn@rnn~rn@ ~p~ I 3 '/\\\)9 1<.c. o.o.e.s. Date ! ' . LIU & ASSOCJrA'fES, ][NC. .· I ,z__ Project · ._ ·: SheetNo.-of_ EL 1::,){ I lbl h fAvet16JJr Q$(4,t;!p. No. __ ~ f'LA1 01-: ftfASAt.lT PA'"J"H Geotechni_~I Engineering_ • Engineering Geology • Earth Science 19213 KENLAKE PLACE NE • KENMORE, WA 98028 PHONE, (425) 483-9134 FAX: (425) 486-2746 -----,--,-~---Job No ~Ao<:JS By _j$l_ Date j,/27/oj Ck'd by Date · ~l-G)(.l@.L,E:, f'AVGMGNT DGSIG)N ,~ e:ASE::j)ON E::Mfli(!CAL--Me:-rl-to6 IN ·" ! 4 q 3 ,A.A.SH To Gi Ll1DE--Fct<.. DGSI&, 1-l ai;:: f"~\/~MG-t-1:f ~-rRJ l:fv~E,t;.! Ol?~(~N f'AMMGfeRs ! •. -rypG ot=: RoAO: \Ji:z..SAN R&.S1DG...l"T1A.L-1 ONE:: L.Ai-.!Eo f2A, DIRGC::..T(oN TRAFFIC-o,~rR.1g,rfi,.,t,.J~ loo%, oi:= Lot-,,..Dtt-.1~ IN ~teqlJ LAN& DGSl~i-l f'GRlo D: 2,o Yv.s .. · At-tiJ01;,.1.-c'::!Row-r-,., RA.fr::..: 2 % t.Qi,1S.,-RUl-"f1ot..! MA16RIA-L.: "f~Y~ HM/:>.. ~uRi::-A-c.t::;. Goli°R~e:; :. 3 "> ,,_. 11 \-1 M A lb A SG Co t.J ~ E:. : 2.." {:j c~e. : <o'' 5t-l-::.. 9)<..0,44+ ~)(0,13 =-Z~°t~ 7Ul¥!RA0 ( Fv'e~h-r~II ~i'\~) .. MF.,:. lb1 ooo fSt ( SuMme,v' 8s .~\\) · · . :::: q I oc'Jc, f'St (Wt V\ +.ev-2,. $I° \11 Vl.5) Ov6l2.P,u.... ~G~v1c.g,o..g1 U1') Loss. ~ .6 f'S1=-Po -ft-=-f. S-3,o =-1, 6 f<6t..\Alsl L.-11)' : (< :::-q o ,Y0 ·. . . . · Ov"G.AAu., S1ANDARD D6V/A1ioN, s~ = 0,'70 . 'I RAFF-/ C C:::...O c.J ~, : . . . . . . . . . . EA . W ~r .· f'A~%s/ 4Af<..e,M-0 '("R.Je,k (S111 ~I.e. Un;+)~ 2. /w Kx Z -x '54 :::: t I 6 7"( v' i:;1.(<e, 8-N(:ilNG"fRVok(DG>ubk.Un:+):::: lo ~te.y1.,. . · .. I. Mov I N6t -rR.v ck. ( DD w 1.k Uvi{./-) ::::. 2, l'lovv..e..c x 3 rr...w/r<:::. 'Vt~!J~ '{,,,_ ffc.ut--1<-1l'<A1 i-1 c;. :::::.-0 . . GSAL.s::: '2.(b')<;0,4o~ ((o+Z4)'><'1,o.:i.:::. !21>/y .... oe~1<:tJ G->AL~-=-(1+<,)~1 >< tio °J . :a::: Q +o, tJ2 .. )z~ I X ( "2-o :::::: 2 9 l b/y v / &.oz 7A1 t)SE:" vl'(_:3 ::: 0000 /'fv. V }~JIU & ASSOC:[A '.n:'JES, INC. '2,. "2...- Project . SheetNO,-· _of_._ EL 6)( 1 rbi £ fAve:M6JT kGSIC?tr!p. No·-----'--- f'LA1 of ft6A.s.A"1I PA'.:r:H Geotechnical Engineering • Engineer:ng Geo10QY • Earth Science 19213 KENLAKE PLACE NE • KENMORE, WA 98028 PHONE: (425) 483-9134 FAX: (425) 486-2746 ~---~~----Job No &>Ao'1B By --l$L. Date -;/z7 / o'j Ck'd by Date . 0~~11.Jf:; s0g.GJ~AOG RG~ILt~tJ, Mo1Dvt..,U.S( cJ~tww we:5 4-+eJ) ~ReJt::::. (e,~i;;xCf,oao +0 1 ~)( <f,o 00 fkcxl~ooo -f (),{~ o -,. f °i OOD) -=r 4' ::::: &>, b 't D p .S .,: U~e AfuDv6 PA!<f\MGf~~ IN --nff; {n>LLow1r,.,J~ &QuAT10N ~ l0s10CW!!3 ')~ e~x ~o + i, ib:xlo5 ,o(st-l+i)-0,-Z.O + . \o, c.c.r~ 1. ) -0, 1:~.,.r,~~f + 2,$2..X /03,o(M~)-6.ol (SNf ') S.t4 ~ou.l~ re~ ~i-j, ~~ St-.! :::-(, lo ~ . . .[{Z."(: HMA ~()~~c.:.~ u:>(.)~Sl:::.: ,.~ HM/).. ~AsG u:><.lR;si.s = 111 · c... ~ e. : 1-" <; f-! -:::. .( /;~-,. I ) o, 44 -/-Z)( c>, I 3 ::. /, , b IJ ~ fl-IE:: W€w -re., p. L s r-..1 ::. I, )~ A~ D Ar'.,ov (::; \:) G-! I (1 ~ f'A RA t"V\Et"e~.s. . IN Ti-10 P.P;;oVE; G6l.iJA1110N 2,.. S-oL-tJE St-I P61A1,.J 1 ~etd-~iJ ~ {.Io -:= (. 3b SH<) Jt...O /!)G () .\(.' DuG-1/~fi...i f....ll:t~f 1 ~ c::f-1 c:. ('.o O \J I ' ~ ~0!2& ~DESIGN April 9, 2009 Core No. 06083 Mazen Haidar, PE Engineer II King County DOES 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, Washington 98055 .y Core Design, Inc. 14711 N.E.29thPlace,Suite 101 Bellevue, Washington 98007 425.885.7877 Fax425.885.7963 www.coredesigninc.com ~rn@rnowrn~ RE: Pleasant Path -King County Constructa~I~ Review Comments APR 1 3 2009 \..-C>"z5~\iJZb KC. D.D.E.S. Dear Mr. Haidar: This letter is in response to the constructability review and engineering review of the Pleasant Path project. Along with this letter you will find 3 sets of revised civil plans, 3 sets of the vault structural plans, 3 copies of the pavement section calculations, I copy of the revised TIR, 1 copy of your engineering review comments along with responses, and County redlined plans. If you have questions, please don't hesitate to call me at 425-885-7877. To assist in your review, we have prepared the following italicized responses to explain how we addressed each of the constructability review comments. See attached excel spreadsheet for responses to County comments. l, The proximity of this project to the wetland should qualify it as a highly sensitive site and require a TESC supervisor. The site drains away from the wetland and is therefore, is not a highly sensitive site. 2. The luminaire plan for the frontage will be reviewed by KCDOT, I assume. As shown, the luminaries are located on private property and would require easements. The luminaires are located within the 10' utility easement located behind the right of way. The luminaire plan has already been approved by the County. 3. The utility poles relocation will require easements, and the pole relocation cost needs to be included in the bond quantity worksheet. · The cost for the utility pole and luminaire relocation has already been paid to the contractor that will be doing the work therefore, the cost does not need to be included in the 06083Ltr06 King County Constructability Review Comments ENGINEER/NG PLANNING SURVEYING " 4/9/2009 Mr. Mazen Haidar page 2 bond quantity worksheet. The utility poles will be located within the 10' utility easement located behind the right of way. 4. The frontage pavement widening will prompt an overlay (including prelevel) of 148th SE ( an arterial) unless waived by the County Roads Engineer. The pavement crown and cross- slope varies along the frontage. As shown on the plans, a ridge appears at the proposed pavement joint along the frontage. The applicant should be prepared for more extensive pavement work than shown on the plans, and possibly revisions to the curb grade design, to address the anticipated requirement from KCDOT for a consistent 2% cross-slope in the overlay. This same type note is shown on the plans on sheet 5 under the title "Street Widening on J 48'h Avenue SE". 5. The pavement taper from the new sidewalk at the south end of the frontage is called out incorrectly to begin at the curb rather than from the back of sidewalk. Revised as requested. 6. The vault outfall along the existing ditch along 148th SE is problematic. Placing it under the ditch causes the pipe crown to daylight as much as 40 feet along the downstream end of the pipe. This renders the existing ditch ineffective and out of compliance with the Road Standards, not to mention the pipe material needs to be ductile iron for lack of cover. It is clear the minimal pipe slope is dictated by the vault outfall invert. One way to address this issue would be to add a Type I catch basin at the end of the pipe, revise the ditch to a paved shoulder section with extruded curb along the length of the pipe, then provide a pipe stubout outfall from the added catch basin. Unfortunately, this would likely prompt an extension of the pavement overlay requirement along 148th SE due to the added paved shoulder. Another way would be to do the same installation but offset the pipe alignment from the ditch, the provide the stubout at an angle to the ditch, and maintain/restore the ditch to its current configuration. Please note there are existing drainage problems immediately to the south along 148th SE due to the lack of an existing pavement crown. Whatever solution is designed, it must not exacerbate the existing drainage issues downstream. The vault outfall has been revised per conversations with you (Mazen). 7. The outfall pipe in the 148th SE ditch requires a beveled end. Callout added. 8. The steep pipe between CB3 and Inlet 3A creates problems where the pipe connects to the CB and the vault. A large elliptical opening in both is required to allow the pipe penetration. The Type I CB 3 may not have enough wall to accommodate the opening. The vault opening structural reinforcement requires specific attention. An alternative would be to move CB3 to the north, allowing a reduced pipe slope. There is plenty of room in the landscape tract to do this. A public drainage easement over the tract is 06083Ltr06 King County Constructability Review Comments , 4/9/2009 Mr. Mazen Haidar page 3 already required to allow vault maintenance, so this easement would cover the conveyance at any location within the tract. CB 3 has been relocated to provide a reduced pipe slope. 9. In the vault, the circular sump for the restrictor T creates a few issues. The sump is usually provided by the use of a Type II catch basin sump. This sump location typically conflicts with the vault footing. It also sets the T back from the vault wall, requiring additional bracing of the T in the gap. This is apparent in the Restrictor Plan View detail (in conflict with the Restrictor Detail elevation view). Also apparent in that detail is the conflict wiith the required 2-foot clearance for the personnel access. The use of the Type II sump is suitable as long as these issues are addressed. Per conversations with the structural designer of the vault, the sump poses no problem as currently shown. During construction, the sump will be placed prior to the pouring of the vault footing. The vault footing will be cast against the sump as indicated on the structural plans. A note to this same effect has been added to the Vault Section B-B on sheet 8 .. 10. I suggest the street tree plan will only require four trees at the frontage, rather than the crowded six shown on the plan. Six trees along the frontage are required to provide minimum number of trees required by Code. Sincerely, CORE DESIGN, INC. -a~~b Gina R. Brooks, P .E. Project Engineer grb@coredesigninc.com 06083Ltr06 King County Constructability Review Comments LUSD ENGINEERING REVIEW SECTION STRUCTURAL REVIEW TRANSMITTAL TO: Hou-Ching Chow, P.E., S.E. *FM: Mazen Haidar, P.E. * · RE: SW Detention Vault for Plat of (project) * DATE: February 10, 2009 *Project# L98SR020 Please accept and review the attached Structural Review Package. The LUSD Engineering Review Section has begun reviewing the engineering plans for the road and storm system; we anticipate completion by as soon as possible. Your efforts in assisting us with this deadline are greatly appreciated. Please contact me at 6-7133 when your review begins or at any time you require additional information. Upon structural approval, please return the plans and approval documentation to the LUSD Engineering Review Section with an approval memo/e-mail and stating any additional required fees. *Description of Structure: Two-cell reinforced concrete underground vault *Location of Structure (Page# and/or describe location): Section 202605 Corner of Assessors Parcel# 1123059010 (1481h Ave, SE) Public ROW: Existing, ______ _ Public Tracts: Existing, ______ _ Private Tracts: Existing ______ _ Easement ( ______ _, Existing ______ _ (Type) Restrictions/Requirements Related to the Structure: (e.g. other approvals (HPA, DOT}, ordinances, elevations) Future ______ _ Future ______ _ Future ______ _ Future ______ _ *submittal Package Includes: minimum: Engineering Plans (Road/Drainage) 1X13 Sheetscopies (1) Structural Drawings and Plans 2 x 3 Sheets copies (2) Manufacturing Specifications (if necessary) copies (2) Design Calculations 2 Report copies (2) Soils Report copies (1) Note: If this is a REVISION to an approved structural plan, then include the approved plans. List of Key Contacts: · King County Sensitive Area Staff: Design Engineer: Structural Engineering Plans: Other:. ___________________________ _ Installation/Inspection lnspectfon Responsibility of Commercials: ________________ _ Contractor License # (if needed). _______ _ Structural Value $. _____ _ Attachments. ____________________________ _ *REQUIRED REVISION DATE: ___ ..,....=i:,c::,,.-.,...,......--,_...___ ____ _ ?.:?: .. · ..-::,-SIGNATURE: ___ ...... ~-~~~~=..------- tQ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 ITY 206-296-7217 www. kinqcounty.qqv January 8, 2009 Josh Beard, LA Core Design 14711 Northeast 29th Pl, Suite 101 Bellevue WA 98007 RE: Pleasant Path Short Plat {ODES File No. L07S0018) Recreation Space Plan Activity No. L08MI075 Dear Mr. Beard: ' draft This is in response to your December 31, 2008 request for approval of the landscape and recreation space plan for the Pleasant Path short plat. We have reviewed your submittal, and with the following conditions and additions, approve it as submitted: 1. The equipment (structures, benches, picnic table, etc.) shall meet at a minimum, Consumer Product Safety Standards and be appropriately anchored. 2. Walkways/Trails shall be installed from the sidewalk to the play areas. Walkways shall be constructed of a material and grade that is Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible. 3. The fence along the perimeter of the tract shall be backed by either chain link or low plantings to alleviate any potential conflicts between users of the recreation space and vehicles (i.e. balls rolling into street, etc.). 4. The grass-crete or other alternatives for access to the stormwater facility must be approved with the engineering plans. If this surface is not approved, a revised recreation plan will be required. In the event a solid surface (i.e. asphalt, concrete, or similar) is required for the drainage facility a revised plat layout may be required, as the access to the drainage facility and associated appurtenances are not counted toward the recreation space requirement. 5. In the event the engineering plans, soil amendment, street tree and/or significant tree plans result in modification/revisions to the recreation space plan, a revised recreation plan will be required. The landscaping and recreation space improvements (i.e. play structures) must be installed and inspected or a performance bond posted, prior to plat recording. The amount of the bond has been established at $40,000. This includes landscaping, equipment, surfacing materials, fencing, etc. The bond amount includes a thirty- percent contingency. as well as the requirement for the wood fence to be backed with chain link or additional shrubbery/low plantings along the fence. Note, this approval does not include soil amendment plan, street trees or significant trees. This will be reviewed in conjunction with the engineering plans. An inspection fee is also due prior to recording. This fee covers the cost of an installation inspection and a maintenance inspection. The amount of the inspection deposit will be determined by the Land Use Inspection Section (LUIS). If a performance financial guarantee is posted, the improvements must be installed within two year's from the date of recording. At the time of inspection by the Land Use Inspection Section, if the improvements are fully installed per the approved plan, the performance financial guarantee may be reduced. Enclosed is a copy of the approved plans for your records. If you have any questions, please call me at (206) 296-7167. If you have questions regarding the financial guarantee please contact Carol Rogers, Finance Section at (206) 296-7250. Questions regarding the inspection process may be directed to the Land Use Inspection Section (206) 296-6642. Sincerely, Kim Claussen, PPM Ill Current Planning Section Cc: Pete Dye, Engineering Review Section w/enc Ray Floren!, Engineering Review Section w/enc Steve Townsend, Development Inspection Section w/enc FGMU w/bond quantity worksheet File w/enc "I ... ~ Core Design, Inc. ~Q~fg ~DESIGN 14711 N.E. 29th Place, Suite 101 Bellevue, Washington 98007 425.885.7877 Fa,425.885.7963 . December 8, 2008 Core No. 06083 Ms. Kim Claussen Land Use Services Division Department of Development and Environmental Sewices King County 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA. 98055-1219 www.coredesigninc.com Re: Pleasant path Subdivision-On-site Recreational Facilities Narrative (L0750018) Dear Kim: Please find the following narrative to help explain the Bond Quantity Work sheets for the Recreation Space & Landscape Plan. Recreation/Landscape Plan: Cut Sheets- A) Cut sheets have been provided for the proposed play equipment (Highlander I by Gorilla Playsets) and safety surfacing (SofFall by SofSolutions) and furnishings (bench, table, trash receptacle by Fairweather). Landscape Bond Quantity Worksheet - A) A landscape bond quantity worksheet has been provided to include improvements within the recreational space tract.. Under the "Additional Items" section the price shown includes the play structure(+/-$3,700), safety surface installation (+/-$1,000), 1 bench & 1 table (+/-$800), 1 trash receptacle(+/-$300), rail fence ( +/-$2,900), timber edge ( +/-$500) and gravel path (+/-$1,170). Please contact me if you have any questions with your continued review. ,LA. Landscape Architect IL091Wl[ 07!5 ENGINEER/NG PLANN/r¥£. Q;Oiv~.YING I ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 PROJECT NAME: Pleasant Path (Rec. Space) Web date· 11/16/2005 LANDSCAPE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET FORM For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. DDES PROJECT#: -'L:c.c0"'-7"-50c...c0:..:.1.::..8 __________ _ ADDRESS: PREPARED BY: _C.::..o::cr.::..e-=D-=e.:csi.w;gn"","""I n"'c"-. ""( J-=o.:csh-'-='Be=-a"'-rd"","""R""'LA=-:,.) _ PHONE: 425. 885. 7877 Bonds are based upon required landscaping only and will be posted for performance and/or maintenance. Required landscaping includes perimeter landscaping, surface parking area landscaping, (KCC 21A.16) and any landscaping required by SEPA environmental review. The maintenance period is for the life of the project, however, after posting for maintenance, the performance bond will be reduced to 30% ($1,000.00 minimum) and be held for a two year period. Upon re-inspection of the site the bond will be released if the site has been properly maintained (21A.16.180). A landscape maintenance inspection deposit is required prior to permit issuance to cover the costs of the 2-year maintenance inspection. Landscape inspections are billed at the current hourly rate once the initial deposit is exhausted. If the project has not been maintained and there are dead trees, shrubs, ground cover, or other deficiencies noted in the required landscaping, the bond will be held until the deficiencies are corrected. UNIT PRICE· UNIT TYPE QUANTITY PRICE SOD LAWN AREAS $500.00 MSF (1000 SQ. FT) -- HYDROSEEDING $50.00 MSF (1000 SQ. FT) 4.3 215 ' ". " '"~ ., , . ,•,, ~ '""---.. ----.. SOIL PREPARATION A. TOPSOIL (6 INCHES DEEP) $25.00 CY (CUBIC YARD) 110 2,750 B. MULCH (2 INCHES DEEP) '$4.00 SY (SQUARE YARD) 318 1,272 C. PEAT MOSS (rWO INCHES DEEP) $2.30 SY (SQUARE YARD) D. COMPOST (3 INCHES DEEP & TILLING $26.00 SY (SQUARE YARD) E. FERTILIZER $6.67 CY (CUBIC YARD) 1 6.67 --_·, . . .• . PLANT MATERIALS A. DECIDUOUS TREES 1.75-2.00" CALIPER (minimum height 10') $250.00 EACH COST& LABOR PERIMETER & PARKING AREAS 5 1,250 1.5 -1.75" CALIPER $225.00 EACH COST&LABOR INTERIOR lANOSCAPING OR OTHER REQUIRED LANDSCAPING B. EVERGREEN TREES FIVE (5) FEET OR ABOVE $150.00 EACH COST& LABOR 4 600 C. SHRUBS $35.00 EACH COST& LABOR 80 2,800 D. GROUND COVER $4.00EACH COST & LABOR 870 3,480 SUB TOTAL BOND AMOUNT BOND AMOUNT SUB TOTAL: $ 12.373.67 06083 LandscapeBondQuantity recspace.doc b-wks-landscapebq.pdf 11/16/2005 ·" I UNIT PRICE UNIT TYPE QUANTITY PRICE -;:_: ,,,. ~-::-.. . -.. ::··' -. ; .;,,"'_., •. ~~a: .-.- MISCELLANEOUS TREE STAKES $2.65 EACH PER STAKE & LABOR 27 71.55 FENCING: LINEAR FOOT SOLID WOOD CEDAR $28.50 INCLUDES LABOR -- BERMING $17.50 LINEAR FOOT INCLUDES LABOR IRRIGATION 80¢ SQUARE FOOT 7,290 5,832 RELOCATING TREES ON SITE 36" BALL $260.00 EACH 60" BALL $920.00 EACH RELOCATING SHRUBS ON SITE 12" BALL $26.00 EACH 24" BALL $33.00 EACH ADDITIONAL ITEMS: Onsite recreation facilities 1 $10,370 SUB TOTAL BOND AMOUNT BOND SUB TOTAL: $ 28,647.22 Add 30% of the Bond Sub-Total for Contingency in accordance 30% CONTINGENCY: with Financial Guarantee Ordinance 120220, Section 13. $ 8,594.17 TOTAL BOND PRICE TOTAL BOND PRICE: $ 37,241.39 Revised LBQW 1111312002 Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes 06083 LandscapeBondOuantity recspace.doc b-wks-landscapebq.pdf 11116/2005 Feair.Weather Standar.d Recycled Plastic Seilection ;/. • . .~. ·•.• -: . 1 . ' ~ . , ·, l . . . t ,, . . J r.-~ · ....... : . t . · ... · ;, r .... 1 ;:__,..-._. -· ..... ·: ;;_·-'-..J· Cellar Grey Weathered wood 17airWeather. Standard C:.:olor Selection CJ IF I ai1l: or Gloss or Semi- Gloss ISlaiclk fDJ!E(e~~~IE~ ~ DEC~ 1 2006 K.C. o.o.e.s. 12 ' 12" LE55 THAN OUT TO OUT DIM. 6" .120 x 2" x 2" STEEL TUBE f : I ·,·_, . •, : .. SURFACE 3/411 .. . i/ 1-1/2" HOLE FOR #3 REBAR MOUNT L ~ .. ' . .... ~ ,·.'· PLEASE NOTE, DEPTH AND DIAMETER OF INSTALLATION HOLE MAY VARY WITH SOIL CONDITIONS. CONSULT ' · ... PROJECT ENGINEER FOR CORRECT DIMENSIONS. EMBED \ 2"x3"WOOD (11/2" X 21/2") 3/8" x 3" STEEL 5TRAP_J ~ t: . 0 15"_J 161/2" 5/8" DIA. HOLES FOR 1/2" ANCHOR BOLTS. (ANCHOR 60Li5 6Y OTHERS) I 29" -r J 161/2" 3/8"x3" JLandscape Seirnes, Model lL-2 lRencll:n STEEL STRAP REV. 6-10--05 5PECIFICATION5 MATERIAL Wood: Wood shall be 11 ea. 1-1/2" x 2-1/2" boards, all edges eased. All boards are 2 inches shorter than nominal size. For example, 6 ft. bench would be 5 ft. 10 in. out to out. Frame: The frame shall be fabricated 3/8" x 3" mild steel drilled and formed for quick assembly, fully welded to .120 x 2" x 2" square steel tube. Benches 5 ft. through 7 ft. long shall have a center strap. Benches 8 ft. through 12 ft. long shall have a complete center frame. All steel shall conform to ASTM A 36 hot rolled steel. FASTENERS Wood shall be attached to frames with vandal resistant stainless steel pan head screws. Mounting hardware by others . PROTECTIVE COATINGS Wood: clear wood preservative Metal: All metal elements, following fabrication shall be cleaned and treated with an iron phosphate process prior to the coating application. This process shall include a non-chromated alkaline cleaner, and an iron phosphate treatment followed with an acidic sealer for maximum adhesion. The protective coatings shall be either polyester or polyester TGIC powder. Following application the parts shall be baked until properly cured. The coating shall be a minimum of 4 mils thick on all surfaces. OPTIONS Mountings: Surface mount or embed Arms: Arms shall be 3/8" x 2" steel strap welded to seat. Length: 4 to 8 ft. standard, other lengths available Wood: Western red cedar, clear vg Douglas Fir, lpe other species available on request. Recycled Plastic: Grey, cedar, weathered wood, light oak FairWeather Site Furnishings 360-895-2626 or Toll Free 800-323-1798 Port Orchard, Washington Cll999--1004 l.eader International c.otporation, FairWeather Site Furnishings division M'"' I- l_ --- . . . • • . 3• x rx .120WALL TUBE 3/16" x3"x r ANGLE • - - • . , . . . . . • . . • • . . . . • R RECYCLED PLASTIC . • . . • . . . • • • • . . • • . . . . fl,s· 321/2" t-L·t ~ ......... l...,i---L-1 __j .. 11 131/2" .. :'-: .. ~·. '4 .- EMBED MOUNT ,-__ 5nxs~x.l80WALL TUBE 3/8· x 16" x 16· BASE ,_14"J 5/8" HOLES FOR 1/2" ANCHORS SURFACE MOUNT Modell lF-4J. oir lF-4ll? 4J.8" Picnic 'Il'alblle with Wheellchanir Access, 4J. x 4J. §lats GRADE REV JJ-02-06 SPECIFICATIONS MATERIAL Table & Seat Tops: 3-1/2" x 3-1/2" wood or · recycled plastic, nominal size is 4 x 4 . Frames: 5" x 5" x .180 steel tube center post. Table top and seat frames fabricated with 3" x 3" x .120 wall tube, 2" x 3" x .120 wall tube and 3" x 3" x 3/16" angle. Steel shall conform to ASTM A36 hot rolled steel. All angle and flat stock shall be wheelabrated prior to fabrication. HARDWARE Slats shall be attached to frames with 3/8" plated carriage bolts, nuts and washers. Assembly hardware is provided. Seat arms shall be attached to center post with carriage bolts secured inside center post for cleaner appearance and Increased vandal resistance PROTECTIVE COATINGS Wood: clear wood preservative Recycled Plastic: none Metal: following fabrication frames shall be cleaned and treated with an iron phosphate process prior to the coating application. The protective coatings shall be either polyester or polyester TGIC powder applied by the dry electrostatic method. The coating shall be a minimum of 4 mils thick on all surfaces. Option: Hot dip galvanizing for frames, in place of powder coating OPTIONS surface or embed mount Lag bolts for assembly hardware Table & Seat Tops: F-4 Wood: Western Red Cedar, clear vg Douglas Fir, lpe F-4P Recycled Plastic: Gray, weathered wood, cedar Embed mounting: Depth & diameter of post hole may vary with 5oil condition5. Consult project engineer for correct dimensions. Surface mount: Anchor bolts by others FairWeather Site Furnishings 360-895-2626 or Toll Free 800-323-1798 Port Orchard, Washington Ql999--2006 Leader International Corporation, FairWeathei--Site Furnishings division 51/2' 0 0 0 0 0 ---. . . 0 0 'o ~ o· ' I I ~A/ TR-2 WITH OPTIONAL llOLT DOWN PEDESTAL ~ 0 0 0 0 :11 Ii Iii .. :.,--~---1 [01\0 Ill o Ill O Ill O Ill 01101 011011011o110110/Jo al I,.. r +/-,.""_:.bJ-" ..• (16) 11/2" • 31/2" ELEMENTS ------ .---~· .,,,,,,;.--., , HOLES ', . / ·•••• (6 l"lACES) ', <:() • w,r,r \ ··.,'(// PLATE ~:'-:[E""° : ---:-T / \ 2" 10 6" A5 REQUIRED ,' . ' ·__l_ : ·.~A~· 29" I l 1•To 4" AS REQUIRED 1.:. __ j [:. . GJ·.: 2" SCH 40 PIPE (20" LONG) .. , ..... TR-2 TAPERED WITH OPTIONAL PERMANENT EMllED PEDESTAL 2T' ~ 1/"I-.. :7 l t.t.L HUUl':7 (2 PLACES) - l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29" 0 0 0 0 0 0 .~1 ~ 11/4" TR-2 WITH STANDARD SURFACE MOUNT REV. 8-10--06 TR-2 Straight and! 'JI'R-2 Tapered! 'JI'Jrash Receptacile SPECIFICATIONS MATERIAL The TR-2 receptacle shall be fabricated with 18 each, 1-1/2" x 3-1/2" wood elements. Elements shall be fastened to 1/4" x 2" and 1/4" x 3" mild steel hoops. Hoops shall be powdercoated a standard FairWeather color. All steel shall conform to ASTM A 36 hot rolled steel. Liner shall be standard 30 gallon galvanized can. FASTENERS Wood shall be attached to hoops with carriage bolts unless otherwise specified. Surface mount: Anchor bolts by others . PROTECTIVE COATINGS Wood: clear wood preservative Metal: Following fabrication, all metal elements shall be cleaned and treated with a five stage iron phosphate process prior to the coating application. The protective coating shall be either polyester or polyester TGIC powder applied by the dry electrostatic method. The resultant coating shall be minimum of 4 mils thick on all surfaces. OPTIONS Straight or tapered sides Leveling feet (set of 4) Wood: Douglas Fir, Red cedar, lpe Recycled Plastic: Grey, cedar, weathered wood Mountings: Surface, embed or pedestal base Tops: Spun steel flat top, spun steel dome top, galvanized dome top Hardware: Lag bolts, corrosion resistant undercoat (frames) Please Note: For Embed Mountings Depth and diameter of installation hole may vary with soil conditions. Consult project engineer for correct dimensions. lFairWeather Site Furnishings 360-895-2626 or Toll Free 800-323-1798 Port Orchard, Washington Cl l 999-200S Leader lntematiorutl Corporation, FairWeather Site Furnishings division Sof'Fall Engineered Wood Fiber is a virgin wood surfacing that is nontoxic, nonflammabl... Page I of2 Specificatooll"lls DESCRIPTION OF PRODUCT o Product is manufactured engineered wood fiber fiber comprised of softwoods and/or hardwoods, consisting of randomly sized wood fibers the majority of which do not exceed 1.5" in length and containing 10% to 20% fines to aid in compaction. (It is generally understood that the manufacturing process allows a few oversized pieces.) • Product must prove to be non-toxic. It may not contain any recycled wood products or any wood containing paint, chemicals or additives. Bidder to provide Toxicity Test Data*. • Product to have minimal bark and to be free of twigs, leaf debris and other organi material, and to be certified as non-flammable. (Test data available upon request • Product depth, after installation, must be in accordance with the procedure described in ASTM F-1292 and meet guidelines for critical height as set forth by the CPSC for use of wood products for protective surfacing. Click below to see CAD details of our products. ~ CADdetails.com ~~ PROOUCl $PEC-SHEElS ASTM TESTING CERTIFICATION Manufacturer must be in compliance and provide testing data for the following standards as set forth by the American Standard for Testing Materials (ASTM), for surface systems under and around playground equipment. 1. ASTM F-1951-99 (Previously ASTM PS 83-97) Determination of Accessibility of surface systems under and around playground equipment* 2. ASTM F-1292-96 IMPACT ATTENUATION of Surface Systems Under and Around Playground Equipm~~t· . . r" re: -··· 3. ASTM F-2075 Standard Spec1f1cat1on for Engineered W~ ~~f~uJled \f; \QJ IL O 8 00 JI O 15 DEC 3 1 200B . htto://www.sof-fall.com/soecs.aso K.C. D.D.l:RS9/06 SofFall Engineered Wood Fiber is a virgin wood surfacing that is nontoxic, nonflammabl... Page 2 of 2 as a playground safety surface under and around playground equipment. CSA -Meets or Exceeds Canadian Standards Association (CSA) 2614-98 IPEMA Certified Manufacturer must provide proof of certification. "In the interest of public playground safety, IPEMA provides an independent laboratory which validates a manufacturer's certification of conformance to ASTM F-1292-99. A list of current validated products, their thickness and critical height may be viewed at WWW.IPEMA.COM" GEOTEXTILE WEED BARRIER FABRIC • Installation of Geotextile fabric must accompany SofFall Engineered Wood Fiber on all new installations. • Geotextile fabric must be a minimum of 28 mills thick and have a tested 26 gallon per square foot per minute permeability. Download an Installation Spec Sheet MANUFACTURER AGREEMENT • Manufacturer must carry 1 O Million Dollars in Product Liability Insurance • Manufacturer must have a written 10-year limited product warranty. *If a summary of these items does not accompany this specification please contact yot representative or customer service Welcome to SofFall®1 SofFall® Is, Specifications I Delivery & Installation Maintenance: Rep Login 1SofMat™ 1 Industry Standard I Request Information I Home Copyright 20(J(J. 2005 S0/'Solutionsn11 lncorpor~ued. A!l rights ri.::si..:rvcd. http://www.sof-fall.com/soecs.aso 8/29/06 [}{]o@D'uDcIDeru@J@IT' 1J ~ ~ ~~~®mm [ID O 1f ffi§il cal [fi) M cal 0 Copyright© 2007 Gorilla Playsef@) ~ (C ~ ~ ~ \E. D' All Rights Reserved lfil l.!:V ~de in the U.S.A. DEC 31 2008 L Ori81]MLJ1D9ltcYh Industrial Court• Canton, GA 30114 • (80$),'88:Dcflill.S. ' IMPORTANT INFORMATION~ IF YOU HAVE MISSING OR DAMAGED PARTS OR NEED ASSISTANCE ASSEMBLING, PLEASE CALL gorilla playsets@ MANUFACTURING DIRECT. (800) 882-0272 FACTORY HOURS -MON.-FRI., 8AMa5PM EST DO NOT RETURN THIS PRODUCT TO THE RETAILER OR CONTACT THE RETAILER DIRECT. THE RETAILER DOES NOT STOCK COMPONENTS. CONTACT INFO: Gorilla Playsets, Inc. 190 Etowah industrial Court Canton, GA 30114 Tel. (678) 880-3328 Fax. (678) 880-3329 custsrv@gorillaplaysets.com 2 Thank you for choosing gorilla playsets® for your new backyard playground! We've included everything you need except tools, to build your very own professional looking playset. When complete, your new playset should far exceed the quality of playset kits from other build-your-own companies. Our engineers and design team have over 30 years of playground experience. What we've developed is a playset that doesn't compromise quality for simplicity. Yet you'll appreciate how quick and easy construction really is! Our playset kits are designed for children ages 3 to 11. gorilla playsets® believes every child should have a playset and with our kits they can! You can rest assured your new playset is safe, durable and designed to hold up to the elements. As parents ourselves we know how important the security and well being of our children is and this shows in all of our products. Each playset features our step-by-step 3D illustrated manual, patented powder coated swing beam bracket, heavy-duty swing belts with chains, slide(s), accessories, plus all the required hardware and pre-milled lumber. Quality Lumber At Gorilla Playsets, we use only the finest, hand selected lumber available. Whether you choose a. playset made from our Premium Preserved Pine, our Beautiful California Redwood or our Western Red Cedar, you can be assured that our lumber is strong, durable, and conforms to the national standards for use in children's play equipment. It's this quality that allows us to offer a 10 year warranty on the lumber used in our play sets. Premium Preserved Pine Our Premium Preserved Pine is double kiln dried. We utilize this process to minimize. shrinkage, warping, and cupping. Because our pine has been "pre-shrunk", the hardware used to assemble your playset will hold tight, stay tight, and won't loosen or weaken. Our preserved pine is clean, odorless, non-staining, and non-irritating to humans, animals, or plants. Gorilla's Preserved Pine uses one of the only exterior wood preservation systems that is EPA approved. Our pine lumber is preserved with a preservative system containing copper and quaternary compounds to protect against termite attack and fungal decay. Our Premium Preserved Pine can withstand harsh weather conditions and is effective for decades, Making Gorilla Playsets the best choice in pine lumber built swing sets. 4 limited Manufacturers Warranty gorilla playsets® ("Gorilla") warrants this product to be free from defects in workmanship and materials, under normal use and conditions, for a period of 10 years for structural wood components and one year for all other components (i.e., hardware, plastics, tarps, rope ladder, etc.). Cosmetic defects that do not affect the structural integrity of the product, or natural defects of wood such as warping, checking or any other physical properties of wood· that do not present a safety hazard, are not covered by this warranty. gorilla playsets® will repair or, at its discretion, replace any part within the stated warranty period that is defective in workmanship or materials. This decision is subject to verification of the defect upon delivery of the defective part to gorilla playsets® at 190 Etowah Industrial Court, Canton, Georgia 30114. Any part(s) returned to gorilla playsets® must include proof and date of purchase. This warranty is valid only if the product is used for the purpose for which it was designed and installed at a residential, single-family dwelling. This warranty is void if the product is put to commercial or institutional use. This warranty does not cover (a) products which have been damaged by negligence, natural disasters, or accident by improper use, or which have been modified or repaired by unauthorized persons, (b) the cost of labor, or (c) the cost of shipping the product, any part, or any replacement product or part: This warranty is valid only in the United States of America, is non-transferable and does not extend to the owners of the product subsequent to the original purchaser. gorilla playsets® disclaims all other representations and warranties of any kind, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, including the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. gorilla playsets® will not be liable for any incidental or consequential damages. Some states do not allow limitations on implied warranties or exclusion of incidental or consequential damages, so these restrictions may not be applicable to you. This warranty gives you specific legal rights. You may also have other rights that vary from state to state. IMPORTANT SAFETY GUIDELINES This product is intended for residential use only and not intended for use in any public setting. A safety surface such as mulch or recycled tire should be used under the play set to prevent injury from falls. Also a 6 foot safety zone should be used around the entire playset. As with any home project, good judgment and respect for power tools will greatly reduce the risk of injury. · gorilla playsets® recommends you follow all tool manufacturers' safety guidelines. Always wear eye protection and safety gloves to prevent injury. In several phases of construction two people may be required for lifting and securing of lumber. While playset is being constructed, please keep children off the equipment until the project is complete. Bolts and screw heads should be checked regularly for tightness. The ground ladder, rope ladder, slide, swings and other areas where children spend a majority of their playtime should be checked more frequently. gorilla playsets® shall not be liable for incidental, indirect or consequential damages or injuries that result from the building and/or playing on our playsets. Adult supervision is recommended anytime a playset is being used. 5 WEIGHT LIMITS FOR GORILLA PLAYSETS o FORT PLATFORMS: 800 LBS. TOTAL WEIGHT o SWING BELTS: 175 LBS. o GLIDER SWINGS: 70 LBS. PER CHILD o TRAPEZE: 125 LBS. o FULL BUCKET SWING: 50 LBS. o TODDLER BUCKET SWING: 50 LBS. o INFANT SWING: 35 LBS. o TIRE SWING: 125 LBS. TOTAL WEIGHT o ROPE LADDER: 75 LBS. o ROCK WALL: 150 LBS. o ALL SLIDES: 250 LBS. Gorilla Playsets recommends that the weight limits for all components must not to be exceeded. Failure to adhere to these and other safety guidelines could result in damage to the playset and injury to the users. 6 Safety and Maintenance Tips for Your New Play Set: o It is recommended that on site adult supervision for children of all ages be present while playground equipment is in use. o Please restrict children from walking close to, in front of, behind or between moving items. o Restrict children from twisting swing chains or ropes since this may reduce the strength of these items. o Warn children to avoid swinging empty seats. o Teach children to sit with their full weight on the center of the swing seat. o Teach children to use the playground equipment in the intended manner. o Teach children not to get off play equipment while still in motion. o Parents should make sure children are dressed appropriately. For example: wear well fitting clothing, shoes, avoid ponchos, and scarves or any loose fitting clothing, which may be potentially hazardous while using the playground equipment. o Restrict children from climbing on playground equipment when wet. o Check all nuts and bolts twice monthly during the usage season for tightness. Tighten as required. It is particularly important to check & tighten bolts at the beginning of each season. o Check swings, chains, and slides for cracks or deterioration. Replacement should be made at first sign of deterioration. Playgrounds should be inspected on a regular basis. If any of the following conditions are noted, they should be removed, corrected or repaired immediately to prevent injuries: (see list, following page) o Hardware that is loose, worn or that has protrusions or projections o Exposed equipment footings o Scattered debris, litter, rocks, or tree roots o Rust and chipped paint on metal components o Splinters, large crack, and decayed wood components. o Deterioration and corrosion on structural components, which connect to the ground o Missing or damaged equipment components, such as handholds, guardrails, swing seats 7 !?lay Set Surfacing Recommendations: Below are some of the recommendations that the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) offers from its Handbook for Public Playground Safety. 1. Protective Surfacing -Since almost 60% of all injuries are caused by falls to the ground, protective surfacing under and around all playground equipment is the most critical safety factor on playgrounds. Certain manufactured synthetic surfaces also are acceptable; however, test data on shock absorbing performance should be requested from the manufacturer. Asphalt and concrete are unacceptable. They do not have any shock absorbing properties. Similarly, grass and turf should not be used. Their ability to absorb shock during a fall can be reduced considerably through wear and environmental conditions. Certain loose-fill surfacing materials are acceptable. Surfacing materials are acceptable, such as the types and depths shown in the table. It should be recognized that all injuries due to falls cannot be prevented no matter what surfacing material is used. 2. Fall Zones -A fall zone, covered with a protective surfacing material, is essential under and around equipment where a child might fall.This area should be free of other equipment and obstacles onto which a child might fall. Stationary climbing equipment and slides should have a fall zone extending a Minimum of 6' in all directions from the perimeter of the equipment. Swings should have a fall zone extending a minimum of 6' from the outer edge of the support structure on each side. The fall zone in front and back of the swing should extend out a minimum distance of twice the height of the swing as measured from the ground to the top of the swing support structure. 8 ' M~ ----, . ® ·o· •~n ··o· "" .W')i\lJ(' 'I! Ii 11s· n, O· ·. ,tc.1l·v· · · r·~L __ /.(v~,,·--'-)~li: 1:yJ,.,\~LIJ_ ',U,~ ·_-_-.1,'1;. __ 1-__ . f 1 l<lng County Deparbnent of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division · , · · .. li't;,...~\~;n,.~ ·si.,,., ~,;,;,,i..,: ·'-'·WJ¥'~:1t. _ · __ ,1r1:e~I 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (206) 296-6600 TTY (206) 296-7217 Alternative formats available . upon request Drop-Off Cover Sheet for Land Use Services Division ******H*"'************"***** IMPORTANT"'********* .. ***"***********"* PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME IS NECESSARY FOR ALL ~~OP-OFF.S Project No.: L b7'50 (J / 8' Project Name: Plt(l ?((Jt r fqt~ FROM: · lov{ Pe')•~ h / Roh C;f£v"-J<~. 6-,M ~YPJf'> Company Na e t'contact Person ' . Telephone No.: 4Z5: /!f,t;-?«77 TO: ;J,{.q:z. P/'.I lf11.'Jor Date Received by LUSD ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY KING COUNTY STAFF (please print) Short Plat/ Plats Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Lot Line Adjustment Permit ;• Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Right of Way Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Clearing / Grading Permit Additional Information requested; please specify ltem(s) dropped-off: reef!. i-o s ;>,: 0 llf. ID ,,, "' Kl = "" '-:,,. z N -., :,;,,. ::Ji: ~ C7' '5 l"'l"I t""'.!> ~·. """, ' ' o.C r. -· Other:------------------~------------------ PLEASE NOTE: All drop-off item(s) will be logged into the computer under the project number, therefore, it is important that the top portion of this form is completed properly before you· drop-off anything. Assistance in finding a project number can be provided by speaking to a Land Use Services Division Person of the Day (POD) or the Zoning/Land Use Technician. Your cooperation is important. Thank you. LUSD Drop-Off Cover Sheet lg-cvs-dropoff.pdf 05-30-2002 Page 1 of 1 ---~ t41l Kirog ColUlfflY Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 ' Engineering Review Comments Review Date: 02/25/2009 Reviewer Name: Mazen Haidar, P.E. Project Type : 8 Lots Short Plat Project Name : Pleasant Path Short Plat Review No.: 2nd Email: mazen.haidar@kingcounty.gov Project Number : L07S0018 Activity Number: -L.,.08_S __ R __ 0_2_0 ______________________________ _ Phone : (206) 296-7133 i-ax: \LUt:>J L96 -6613 Project Manager: Peter Dye, P.E. Sub Document Review Comments and Code Reference Consultant Response Date: <:'.L 'U //",Li Complete Item Item Reference Name: Gina Brooks, P.E, , , , 0 w7 IV/NI Sheet 5 1 Please revise the DDES Approval Block as shown in red on all Revised as requested. ~.,.v. ,/ plan sheets except the standard cover sheet Sheet 7 1 In plan views please label Tract "A" as landscape tract Revised as requested. encumbering a public drainage easement dedicated to King v" Countv for the RID facilities Sheet 8 1 In the vault section details please show 5' X 10' openings for Revised as requested. equipments access with hinged man access in the RID section ./ of vault, and please make sure the vault structural plans are revised to reflect this change as well 2 Please clearlv label the control structure location on olans Revised as reauested. • 3 Drainage Easement shall be shown within proposed Tracts A Tracts A and B labeled on sheet 7 as Public Drain. v and B Esm't to Kina Co. and Access Esm't to Kina Co. General 1 The submitted Geotechnical Report contains pavement See attached. section recommendation and it does not contain pavement /,/J f'YM,..-_ .D~ v design calculations, please submit three sets of these calculations for County review and approval as soon as ,,,,,,..,.pv..£ ,f,v.._ h.,e nossible. + ~ j ,,f. Gf'("-w.J;l Q.J Please be informed that channalization and street lights plans Noted. ff<>-A. review is pending for the subject project and full compliance -rv--4 z:;-~ -,,,,,,-- with review comments (if any) is required for the engineering review annroval MJM:r::. I f;,' /.:z.7/P'f 3 Please be informed that Constructability Review is pending for Noted. the subject project and full compliance with review comments v-- (if any) is required for the engineering review approval 4 Please refer to plans redline markups and revise accordingly Revised as requested. v 5 Please submit 3 copies of revised Civil Plans, revised vault See attached. Structural plans, and all County redline markups with list of ,/ resnonses to this list of comments •: " ' I ., 1j ,l' '.:: ;/, r I.: ~ ,/,., ·--~· <', Et23RD §T -----·------______ _ EXISTING FOGLINE \ ,' --------~\ :·\, ', ,.'l : ' ·' 25Lf l2"LCI s .. . , ' I ·! :-::. '. .. I· . " --' I ' •• ' , If . . I I -=--e,Lo· .. -.! .. 1. ' TYP£H,;48_"1. : . i.: STA. 10+52. -21.25'. RT., · R/1,1 s,aoo · ·5,. /£ 505.95 12" 1£ 50180 (N) · · ' · . ·.1r 1£ 5054t"(str:· i · OUTLET 191 · ux:A TE AS SHOHN . · · · 12" /£ 505.59 .. ' ! C82 TYPE I . .. ' ·10f~7.j9 PROP Boi.titoARY . "STA: -to+56, BEGIN "SIDEWALK . RAUP fl.OYiUNE £LEV. ,51a5-1 STA 11+!9.!8, PC, · ciJRB RDURN Flot'tUNE ELEV. 512.38. • 1.:. \ ~TA, 11+69 f 148111 Al£ SE• I I . STA. o+OO ROAi) A STA 12+18.00. PT CVRB RlTUP.N FLOr.uNE ELEV. 5!5.00 I STA. 12+13, 21.25' RT.· RI/J 516.18 . . . .... :. -!, ... ,2~ /£.· 51.J. i~. STA · 12+86.10. END SIDEWAI.K RAMP FlOHf./NE ..fl!V.. §!.6:.18.. STA. 12+91. 71, PROP BOUNDARY ... ( CB 2A TYPE/ C""): I STA; 13+39.83, 17.52' Rr.· · !;;!:. ~\I· II -\· LOCATE OVER EXIST.: CUL VERT. ?s ~, RI/J 517.57 ,:, i;!• \ .1 .II .. : . : 12" 1£:515.51. ;,,.;. ~ _j ~.::.l<' . \ ~ \· B RE!NF HORZ I, E (2)·#5 ,ARS@ .THE !NE 12-1/211 JRE POUR. === ® . . .. 811 TH CK CONCRETE WALL AT VAULT PER! ETER. 48 11 TYPE 2 CATCH BASINI-----\:'.: BASE .:,, . ~ · .. '.'· .-·,., . • .. , .... ·~· '· SECTION @ SUMP /, SCALE N/A . -·:--:t. \I-::, r f\:.1). \}~a '. ' ' CB 2 ··TYPc, STA •. 12+?3, (21.25' RT RIM 5!6i8 "'' 12" !E.°s!J. '1 ·- CB 2A T'IPF I , i ...... ._.,.,.STA.'J'!J+J9.8J,· 17.52''R[ . LOCATE.OVER [XJST.. CUL VfRT. R!U 5!7.51 ' · ,r 1('s1s.s4 . ! . i STA. !!+19.18, PC, · .. CURB RETURN fLOM..l!fE I I ,£LEV. 512.38 § . 1•· SrA 11+69 f uam Al£ SE= , n; STA. 0+00 f RO;,O A STA. 12+1aoa PT CURB Rt.TURN FLOWl.lNE El.EV. 515.'00 STA. :12+86.70. END . · SIOtWALK RAMP FlO'ltl.!NE I I [?E~_.5-.~f.1~-_ --~; ___ ..... STA. 12+91:lf,· PROP iJOUNOARY <:"'): I '> ;-,\. I ... 5>~\ .\ . I ~~I I.\ \'i;:;,lcl : I ... ':'-I .. Pleasant Path Page 2 of3 3. The utility poles relocation will require easements, and the pole relocation cost needs to be included in the bond quantity worksheet. 4. The frontage pavement widening will prompt an overlay (including prelevel) of 148th SE (an arterial) unless waived by the County Roads Engineer. The pavement crown and cross-slope varies along the frontage. As shown on the plans, a ridge appears at the proposed pavement joint along the frontage. The applicant should be prepared for more extensive pavement work than shown on the plans, and possibly revisions to the curb grade design, to address the anticipated requirement from KCDOT for a consistent 2% cross-slope in the overlay. 5. The pavement taper from the new sidewalk at the south end of the frontage is called out incorrectly to begin at the curb rather than from the back of sidewalk. 6. The vault outfall along the existing ditch along 148th SE is problematic. Placing it under the ditch causes the pipe crown to daylight as much as 40 feet along the downstream end of the pipe. This renders the existing ditch ineffective and out of compliance with the Road Standards, not to mention the pipe material needs to be ductile iron for lack of cover. It is clear the minimal pipe slope is dictated by the vault outfall invert. One way to address this issue would be to add a Type I catch basin at the end of the pipe, revise the ditch to a paved shoulder section with extruded curb along the length of the pipe, then provide a pipe stubout outfall from the added catch basin. Unfortunately, this would likely prompt an extension of the pavement overlay requirement along 148th SE due to the added paved shoulder. Another way would be to do the same installation but offset the pipe alignment from the ditch, the provide the stubout at an angle to the ditch, and maintain/restore the ditch to its current configuration. Please note there are existing drainage problems imme.diately to the south along 148th SE due to the lack of an existing pavement crown. Whatever solution is designed, it must not exacerbate the existing drainage issues downstream. 7. The outfall pipe in the 148th SE ditch requires a beveled end. 8. The steep pipe between CB3 and Inlet 3A creates problems where the pipe connects to the CB and the vault. A large elliptical opening in both is required to allow the pipe penetration. The Type I CB 3 may not have enough wall to accommodate the opening. The vault opening structural reinforcement requires specific attention. An alternative would be to move CB3 to the north, allowing a reduced pipe slope. There is plenty of room in the landscape tract to do this. A public drainage easement over the tract is already required to allow vault maintenance, so this easement would cover the conveyance at any location within the tract. 9. In the vault, the circular sump for the restrictor T creates a few issues. The sump is usually provided by the use of a Type II catch basin sump. This sump location typically conflicts with the vault footing. It also sets the T back from the vault wall, requiring additional bracing of the Tin the gap. This is apparent in the Restrictor Plan View detail (in conflict with the Restrictor Detail elevation view). Also apparent in that detail is the conflict wiith the required 2-foot clearance for the personnel access. The use of the Type II sump is suitable as long as these issues are addressed. 10. I suggest the street tree plan will only require four trees at the frontage, rather than the crowded six shown on the plan. Mazcn Haidar, P.E. ~ineerll Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055 -1219 mi:!zen. hi;i_ic;:t~..r@kingt;_O.Ynty~gg_y_ P 206. 296. 7133 F 206. 296. 6613 Office Hours M -Th 6:00 am -4:30 pm 03/31/2009 Pleasan_t Path Haidar, Mazen From: Sent: To: grb@coredesigninc.com Monday, March 30, 2009 4:22 PM Haidar, Mazen Subject: Pleasant Path Attachments: 20090330160745690.pdf Mazen, Please see attached in regards to comments 6 and 9 below. Page I of3 6. Please review my 'redlined' profile for the outfall pipe. I am proposing to regrade the ditch flowline between the proposed pipe outfall and the existing culvert to eliminate the previously exposed pipe. This new ditch profile results in a worst case ditch that is 1 foot deep. The minimum cover over the pipe is 0.5'. Since this ditch will receive little drainage since all upstream drainage is contained within the pipe that this project is installing, I don't see an issue with the ditch being regarded with a worst case depth of 1' prior to the pipe outfall. As well, it doesn't seem necessary that this pipe should be ductile since it will not experience traffic loads except under the existing driveway in which case the pipe has 3' of cover. Please let me know if this design is acceptable. 9. Please review the structural design of the sump section for the control structure. Per the structural engineer, the sump will not affect the structural integrity of the footing that will be poured around it. Since this is the case, no revision to the location of the sump should be necessary. Moving the sump away from the wall will create a situation where the control structure will be difficult to stabilize. Please let me know if our current design is acceptable. Thanks for your help. Gina R. Brooks, P.E. Project Engineer Core Design Inc. 14711 NE 29th Place, Suite 101 • Bellevue, WA 98007 Tel 425.885.7877 • Fax 425.885.7963 http://www.cor~designinc.com •••New From: Haidar, Mazen [mailto:Mazen.Haidar@kingcounty.gov] Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 6: 14 AM To: Core -Gina Brooks Subject: RE: Pleasant Path Hello Gina, Below are the constructability review comments we just received from the Land Use Inspection Services, please review and properly address these comments in your next re-submittal and let us know if you have any questions, thanks: I. The proximity of this project to the wetland should qualify it as a highly sensitive site and require a TESC supervisor. 2. The luminaire plan for the frontage will be reviewed by KCDOT, I assume. As shown, the luminaries are located on private property and would require easements. 03/31/2009 Pleasant Path From: grb@coredesigninc.com [mailto:grb@coredesigninc.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 4:50 PM To: Haidar, Mazen Subject: Pleasant Path Mazen, Last question ... I promise. Page 3 of3 On your comments list, you indicated that the drainage easements need to be shown on Tract A and Bon sheet 8 (Vault Detail Sheet). Tract A is an easement itself and no easement linework is shown. The easement line along Tract Bis shown but not called out. How do I address this comment. Do you simply want a callout for the easement line shown on Tract B? Gina R. Brooks, P.E. Project Engineer Core Design Inc. 14711 NE 29th Place, Suite 101 • Bellevue, WA 98007 Tel 425.885.7877 • Fax 425.885.7963 http://www.coredesigninc.com • • • New 03/31/2009 I, JGf[J & ASSOC][ATE§, INC. Project · Sheet No. __ of_· FL6i< 1 rbl h f'A,Je:MW Q$(4r,!p. NO.----'- PL.Ar of: f'LE-A~~T PA'.IJ:1 Geotechnical Engineering • Engineering Geology • Earth Science 19213 KENLAKE PLACE NE • KENMORE, WA 98028 PHONE: (425) 483-9134 FAX: (425) 486-2746 DESIGN CALCULATIONS ROADWAY FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT PLAT OF PLEASANT PATH 12204-148TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WASHINGTON ®1@©1gU~1g@ ti.PR 1 3 'l\)09 ate. o.o.e.s. Date ' L:n:U & ASSOC:n:A TES, :n:NC. . . I -z_. Project _ . · __ ·: Sheet No._of_ FL6l<I &I b f'A\/eMM Q,$1{:aJ;!p. No·--~ f'LA1 op fLf:ASAt.l! f'A-rH GeoteChni_~l 'Engineering • Engine~ring Geology • Earth Science 19213 KENLAKE PLACE NE • KENMORE, WA 98028 PHONE: (425) 483-9134 FAX: (425) 486-2746 -----,----,......-----Job No EbAo "f e, By .j $L. Date -;/z1 / b4 Ck'd by Date · .. ~L.G)(.t{;L.E:, f"AVG-MGt-l"'f DGS!G)N (~ @ASepo1'1 EMf'll<!CAL--ME;-1HoD IN " 14'13 ,A.A.SHTo GiutOE-~ ,Di;;,sr&,N OF f"iVE?'MGl-1.1 ~-r~Jc.:fv~~~? Qtr$(('EjN fAMMGfeRs ! . -ryp6 o(: RoAO: \Jt<..SAt-l ~.StD<?Nl'tAL-1 ONG l..A.NE':c EA, DIRGC..Tio..J 1RAfftc. Ol~fR!~t.Jiio\J: (c:,o % o~_LoA.DtiJ6j IN l)c;,~ltfilJ LAt..15 DG-<;IGtt-1 f'GRlo D: 2-o Yvs .. · At--li.JU1->.t... ~RoW"fJ-1 RAfe.: .2 % 0t-lS-rRUt.."f1oi,.l MAfE;R(f-1...L: t~'l"=-HM.A. ~'-'RPAG~ eou·~~~ :. 3. · ''> ..--11 rl MA e.A SG eou~e. : ~' l:j. C ~ e. : <a'' 0u~RAG ( h"e£h "f;1I ~i"\~) 5i-l-==-9><-o,44+ b:>(.0,\'3 .t-1~:::. lb1 ooo fSt ( Su~V\'\e,-1 &; .~JI)·· . . :::: q, Oc)o f'Sl (wt t11 +,e.,,-2.-$1"' vi' \1\5) Ov6,2.p.LL.. ,;GR_Vte&P-e.1 u-ry L.o.ss. ~ .6 fS1=-Po -R-=-A. ~ _., -·1 -. •.· ,.=> J,0 -•? R 6 t...\ A e, I 1.-1-ry : f< .:::-'1 o ,Y0 . · · · 0,J'{E..(<AL,,.L,. S-rAt-lDARD DGV/A1ioN, s~:::: o,c;o . "f R':r:~~~~~:~k (S,ri ~1-e tJ n ;+) ·~ Z eA/w K X Z 'I< '54W ~ ti [A~Jtfr V r;::,. 1<6 5-t,\~1t-\G "f~vol::.(DG>ubkUl'l:-I--) :::. lo ~.i:ef 1v . . .. /. Movtr-l6t -rR.uck.(Dc>tJloiR.UVJ(f-') ==-2Hovvwx 3. (tl"(1;el((< =-vt~ss~y.,,._ rte.r.J£..(<-1AA1 to!'::. ::::. 0 . . G.SAL..s-::: 2{b>"><0,4ot-(10+24-)'X'!,Dc.=: 12-c>/Yv [)~~1'4tJ '2~AL:, ((+~)':_.\ ></2-o -::;. '7 z:::; (J +o, o2-)z~ 1 x I -io ::::: 2 9 l b / v c,,c,z . / '1 y t;A'f ()SE; t:iJ(_~ :: booo /'fv. ,LIU & ASS0CKA1'JE§, KNC. Geoiechnkal Engineering • Engineer.ng GeoroQY ; ·Earth Science 19213 KENLAKE PLACE NE • KENMORE, WA 98028 --"--c--------,------,-----Job No &>AO "16 By j $t... Date -;/27 / oj Ck'd by PHONE: (425) 483-9134 FAX: (425) 486-2746 Date . 0~(1\V'c; S0f;Gi~AOG RG~ILtftJi Mo'DuL,LJS( GJ~tuw wei'j 4-+ecR) ~ tZe-Jk :::. 0?, 8<;,x'1;000-\-O!J;< q,o 00 f koxl ~oo o -fo/16 y. (o,oooJ,t4 ~ ·-B~/to ps~ . --'-'---- u~e: A~v6 PAMMGfB<:S IN --nfG ~LloWIN~ E:&UAT10N ~ lo5,0CW!13 )-:::-°er<_X S0 + '7, lb:xlo5 10(S"1+ i)-(1,-Z.., f -\05,0 (a£:~~) . O,'--~•:>-t (o"/4: + 2,'$2..X /05 10 (M~)-8.ol (s N f,) s.i-, ~ouJt; ro~ ~t-1, ~~ St-.! ~ I, lo . // f-( MA -So~~c.G l.i>u~SG:.:: / .c; HM A P.,A~G U:,c.l~SI,::: : 111 . C.R. e, : 1.-'' ~Is-!-=-.(/;~-,. r )o,t(-4-tZ)(.o.(3 :-/, '3£ lJ Se-il-16 tJ~w ir2J P.. L S ,-...I :::. I, r2>. A~ o A~o'1 fc lj) G-! I Ei !J f'A RA t'\I\E'f<:= I"(.$ . IIJ 11-lG-P.fl=oVE: C:;&lJATrlDN $,.. SoL,IJE St-! P61A1,-I 1 ~etd. ~r-l .,,,,_ (. ( 0 -:= (. 3b -rrte~~n,RE:;1 fAv~MEJJ-rvE~(~tJ Z)~ · ~ . \-~' MMA SuR~ACh (,,au~ >e 'r Sf-tc,JL,O eiG O ,k. . . I. HMA \3>ASE:-Coc.J~s~ c j Dt>G-1/~fi..i f...16'Hf ,t,1' C:..~ ~ · -1~ c:f-1 c:. C.o cJ \J I {~~ l,o,.J<;,E:R_v'AftVE::i f\Jjl?.f'c,~<S-J US..e; . . . . . . . { ~,t' HM/-\ ~~Ac..<:;-Gouf2.~tS--3 As RE-(.,oW)W)G:"108> . ,z.'' HMA ~/::,,,,,;<:; . ltl LIU & PrSS.0, · (o 1' c.L~ . , < /1 ~ZoDS ~ G-o r~c f..f rJ I CAG ~~or:?:f I, LIU & ASSOC][ATE§, ][NC. Project Sheet No._ ot_· EL 6)( I fb! h f'A\/E:MGJT Q,sl(at,Ap: No __ ---'--- f L,A.1 Of--: ftfASAf!T PA'.111 Geotechnlcal Engineering • Engineering Geology • Earth Science 19213 KENLAKE PLACE NE • KENMORE, WA 98028 PHONE: (425) 483-9134 FAX: (425) 486-2746 --~---.------,--~--'-~~Job No R>Ao Cf B By .J.$1.... Date ·i,/z1 / c,4 Ck'd by DESIGN CALCULATIONS ROADWAY FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT PLAT OF PLEASANT PATH 12204-148TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WASHINGTON oorn@rnowrn@ APR 1 3 ,0119 OC.C. 0.0.E.S. Date ' L][U & ASSOC][ATES, ][NC. . .· I ,z_. Prpject _ · .: ·: Sheet No._of_ EL6)(t&ff; f'A\/er:'.l6NT Q$!4t;l,p,No, __ _ f'LA1 01--: f'Lf:ASAt.lT PA:rH GeoteChni.tal ·Engineering. • Englne13:ring Geology • Earth Science 19213 KENLAKE PLACE NE • KENMORE, WA 98028 PHONE: (425) 483-9134 FAX: (425) 486-2746 ----~-.-~---Job No ~Ao"IS By .j Sl-Date j/27 / t>j Ck'd by Date · ~L..G><.1 c;L.E:, f'AVGMG"11 i)GS16).tsi I 5 '6ASE::D ON EMPt~CAt-ME;:-iHoD . . . . .· . A. IN.\\ (4'13 AASHTo CiLJ\OE:. Ft;:R.Di;;;s1C:qt-l 6~ f't1...V~ME?N.1 ~-r~uG'fv~~~? 06-~t(EiN PAf<:AMGfeRs ! . . . . . . . ""fyp6 oi:;: RoAO : \) \Z.Sf.>..r-l ~s, D~NllA'-, o,..J & l.ANE:c E:A, DI RGC.TioN '[R..AfflG o,~rR1gu'fio..J~ lc:,o % oi==: LoA.DIN~ IN l);;~lt,'.jtJ LAtJ& D~SIGtiJ f'GRlo D: 2-o Yvs . · Ai'liJUt,.1.-~Row1H RAf~: .2 % L'.-ot,1~:fROC:.-"'{"101-l MAfe,:R(t.s..L : 1'~1'~ HM/.>.. ~uRPA-ct2-c:ou·R~~ :_ 3_ · "> ... 11 rl MA e,r....s,,; Cou~~ : 2.'' C5 c~e. : <a'' 0uf¥1RAG, (rre~h-r~,, ~n~) ~N-=-9><o,44+ ~><?\1'3 ==-z:q<l t-1 f!.. -:::. I bl Ooo rs t ( s I,) ~\'\'\e,v' &; . t:;:,._\ \) ... ;::: · q 1 ooc, f'$l' ( Wtvi+,e.,-2, S(->V1\/l.5) Ov612.P,LL.. >6~\/lO?P..~lt...rry Los.~~ .6FSl=-Po-~-=-A. ,_ _ ·1 ,,.... · · f · 1 ,:, 3,0 -, ? ·. R6t....\t-'.e.11,.1-ry: R ;-q o '}'0 ·. . -· · Ov'/E.RAW... 5."fANDARD DGV/A"'(ioN, s~:: O,C::,o . -rRAF-PI C <'.'.:.-0 c.) iU, : . ;. . . . . . EA . . . w kr . FA~se.74 4ARe.r~-6rG· '"fR.uvk(S,11 11-eL.lvi;+)==-2. /wKx2.'><~4 :::::216 '(v r;:;1(<e, &t--l(Ei1t-lG"f!'<'!Vvk(DG>ul.k.(.)n,+-) ==-lo ~"'o/'(v . · . ,/, Mov I r-16i -rR.u Ck. ( DD c.J blR. <.J.,,1{.f-) ::::: 2 ~O'tM.! X 3 ft,w.J/-r'( = #~ sser-rv. fRucA<--n~1"1,; ~ 0 . . . GSAL~ ::: '2.lb-x o,4o-r C!o+2".J-)xl,Dci..:: t2-c>/y .... Pf~14 tJ ~~AL~"=' ( I +~J ':...1 °) )< l 2-o ·:a::: CJ fo, 02.-)'Z~ I X ("1-o :::::: 2 9 I b /Yv . &,c,z 1 · ~A'1' l)SE-vJ(_~ ::: 0000 [fv. . ' , L[U & ASSOC[A TJES, [NC. Geoiechnical Engineering • Engin9er.ng Geoto9Y ~ ·earth Science 19213 KENLAKE PLACE NE • KENMORE. WA 98028 PHONE: (425) 483-9134 FAX: (425) 486-2746 · G'~-c.1\vf;; s0e.G,RAOG RG~lt.lGNi Mo'Dl.)i..,l}$( cJ~;-uw wei'j 4+-eJ.) ~ ~ eJt: ~ (e, S'jX .'1,000 + c,,iy_.>( 'f,o 00 f kox I qoo o -+o.t~o ><, fl'ioooJ-=t4 ~ .~1(:/fo ps~ Use Al?:vv6 PAMMGf~,S IN -nf6 ~!.l.ow1"1~ E&UATroN ~ l0s 1o(c;:rj"~ )-:::. CR_ X so+ '1, ~{. )( 105 ,o(s t-.1-t-j. )-0,-Z.O + \oj ct::.rs1-) -0 , 1~,:,f (~§f + 2, ?-2..>< I Oj 10 (M~) -6,o 1 (SN fl) S,f4 ~i? u/~ ro~ ,s t-J , · ~~ Si-.1 :::-I,! o !<ZY : f-{ MA -So~0Ac.G c.,u~se: :. l :i;11 HM/)., 12;,AsG~c.iRse: 111 • C-R. e:. : 1-" ~!J =. ( /;~-f" I )OJ(-4 -f Z)( 0, ! 3 :. /, ~ b U ~ fl-IE:; t-..lfvJ 1/2.J p. L S r,J .::. (. 5"f> A~ 0 llt~ol/ f:: 'D G-S t c, IJ PA RA l'\I\E-"fE ~s · IN THG-P.P;oVr:; ~6l.Uf'.\{11DN 2,.. SoL,\)fE; St-I P<'.SlAI~ /. !\et~ ~iJ"""" f.to ~(.3b ,!fe~~Fl>RE:-1 fAv~ M8-J-r 'i)E;~ t~ ~ z:>F,-·. ~ \-~ 1 H:MA St>R~AC6 u,V~ >£:':; ') Srti>Jl.,O eiG O .I(.. · /. HMA ~,AS~ Cou~~~; j DuG-ve{l...,'f t..16!~1 -ti' C:.-~ B . '"(M t:f-1 c. C:o u \J i fur« Lot-l~R.v'A111J~ Puie-f'o~e-1 US.E: . · · · . · . { 3u HM/.i.. ~f!.F-Ac.E;-c.oufZ.~'G-J As RE-(....0W1Mr;;t10G;> 'Z. ll 11 MA {!;./::...Sf:;; . . I tl LI lJ & PrSSo' · ro '' ~'3 · , , /r l..../Z-oDS ~G-of~CC-fNICAG ~ef'o'{j I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ ~Oiz.& ~DESIGN Core Design, Inc. 14711 N.E. 29/hPlaco,Suifo 101 Bellevue, Washington 98007 425.885.7877 Fax425.885.7963 www.coredesigninc.com TlECHNlICAJL JINFORMATION RlEJPORT (T.I.R.) Prepared by: Reviewed by: Date: Core No.: FOR JPJLJEA§ANT JP ATH KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Nathan W. Driggers, E.l.T. Gina R. Brooks, P.E. April, 2008 06083 IBi \l©~O\Ylrn@ APR 2 8 2008 K.C. D.D.E.S. \...6~~~ h~S>o0\~ ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYING I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 1 PROJECT OWNER AND · ·. · PROJECTENGINEER·'·· .. ,.-·· -. Project Owner f> ~A.\: P"'-.\h I LJ.f Phone ('1ZS7 78'.S-2 S70 Address i~~~fwt~~% ~c,\e.7~q1 Project Engineer (; i!'.'A f}r:ctJs~ P£ Company Core I)...,;l:;f' , 1,,()(1 Phone ifZ , - :'F:. .:;-.:,c··.•."'>~: · _ , .. :::·. ',L\;,_:;.;:..i_:.z;,;,;11-:'l..-~ .. :..._, ~< .-.;;;.~:),·:·-~ :-· -. ... ~-·.:~ :tfrt __ [:!1~I?ttJ.~M!'.~~l'!~~~ !!~~.:,,. · ·. ,,;~,, ll<I Landuse Services ~ubdivison',,; Short Subd. / UPD D Building Services M/F / Commerical I SFR ~ Clearing and Grading ~ Right-of-Way Use 0 Other Technical Information Report Type of Drainage Review TFtilll / Targeted / (circle): 't:arge Site Date (include revision dates): Date of Final: ~(? Project Name Pb:ie,;,,rv\ Jllli ODES Permit # /..07 scot IS Location Township l';JN Range SE Section _ ___,/_,_1 I ___ _ Site Address LZZO'f &:et::J-A:t,:: ~ .:;-,~;>:•.q,1·.J;;..;.7'h.i-"f :,~'!_',. · ··.-_;.<:, .. ~.> ;.: .. ,·.-;..,:-;c;-1.·!;_'i..ii,'.f,-,.;_c.:..: '"?7 ;, 'Rart''4:POTHER REVIEWS AND,li?ERMl;rs>.\ · :it~· . .t:~-'1:-l~;t,i;,i";f")t_(\'7' 1. ,~,~ :~;r·· '_,';'<· ·' .,; ''. ,: '}_!'.f~.~;;".~ '/ ;. ,'_ 0 DFW HPA O Shoreline 0 COE404 0 DOE Dam Safety 0 FEMA Floodplain 0 COE Wetlands 0 Other __ _ Management ~ Structural RockeryNault/ __ 0 ESA Section 7 Site Improvement Plan (Engr. Plans) Type (circle one): c6![) / Modified Small Site Date (include revision dates): Date of Final: 'l(zcoe Type (circle one): Standard / Complex I Preapplication / Experimental / Blanket Description: (include conditions in TIR Section 2) Date of Annroval: 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 1/1/05 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Describe: Monitoring Required: Yes / No -------------- Start Date: Completion Date: Community Plan: -'-'tJwe"""'"""'c..""oo.i.~.a\e...._ ______ _ Special District Overlays:------------------------ Drainage Basin: -----1:/...~o~w~erc_j,,,ji:Q:;,,,__:____r:lU!~=--~,,_- Stormwater Requirements: ~.:.i<.-1...l,..lfc..Q..,..J[#+.!.&45'i:£.J,'!\e:l:J~....1:l!!Jd-..l..!l~b~".l._--- 0 River/Stream O Steep Slope --------- 0 Lake O Erosion Hazard ~ Wetlands we.4/c.aJ 41= 31Z3i?> 0 Landslide Hazard _____ _ 0 Closed Depression O Coal Mine Hazard-------- 0 Floodplain O Seismic Hazard -------- 0 Other O Habitat Protection-------- ~YPJ J Al (J,~f, 0 High Groundwater Table (within 5 feet) 0 Other _________ _ 0 Additional Sheets Attached 2005 Surface Water Design Manual Slopes '1-/5% 2 0 __________ _ 0 Sole Source Aquifer 0 Seeps/Springs 1/1/05 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET ·-. , .. Part 11 DRAINAGE DESIGN LIMITATIONS .. REFERENCE LIMITATION/ SITE CONSTRAINT D Core 2 -Offsite Anal~sis 0 Sensitive/Critical Areas D SEPA D Other D D Additional Sheets Attached Threshold Discharge Area: T)\nr. "---"{\\ '.I) \ \ <l... · 1 \ ~ /name or descriotion) T l:.IA>J-A l' Yw\'V\ 0 tt:.- Core Requirements (all 8 apply) Discharqe at Natural Location Offsite Analysis Flow Control (incl. facility summary sheet) Conveyance System Erosion and Sediment Control Maintenance and Operation Financial Guarantees and Liabilitv Water Quality (include facility summary sheet) Number of Natural Discharqe Locations: / Level: Q.)' 2 I 3 dated: _ _.1,,-./3cl""'l~z.,.oo""'-<7'---- Level: 1 / l£) I 3 or , ~xemption Number ____ _ Small Site BMPs " LL, ~ , •.•• 1 Spill containment located at: ESC Site Supervisor:Qol\\1~ -\o ~it\W-..\,e.., Contact Phone: '--l After Hours Phone: Responsibility: Private / ~ If Private, Maintenance Log Required: Yes / No Provided: Yes / o Type: (.Basic ) Sens. Lake / Enhanced Basicm / Bog or Exemption No. --------- Landscape Mana!'.]ement Plan: Yes / No Special Reauirements (as annlicable) Area Specific Drainage Type: CDA / SDO /MOP/ BP/ LMP / Shared Fae. {None.) Reauirements Name: Floodplain/Floodway Delineation Type: Major I Minor / Exemption / ~ 100-year Base Flood Elevation (or range): _____ _ Flood Protection Facilities Source Control (comm./industrial landuse) 2005 Surface Water Design Manual Datum: Describe: Describe landuse: Describe any structural controls: 111105 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Oil Control High-use Site: Yes ie_v Treatment BMP: Maintenance Agreement: Yes / No with whom? Other Drainaae Structures Describe: . Part 13 • EROSION AND SEDIMENTCONTRO~ REQUIREMENTS · ·· . ·_: ··.,, .. · .. \ ' '··' MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION AFTER CONSTRUCTION ~ Clearing Limits ~ Stabilize Exposed Surfaces ~ Cover Measures . ~ Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities I] Perimeter Protection ~ Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris Ensure ~ Traffic Area Stabilization Operation of Permanent Facilities ~ Sediment Retention D Flag Limits of SAO and open space ~ Surface Water Control preservation areas D Other W Dust Control ~ Construction Seauence 'Part 14 STORMWATER FACILITY DESCRIPTIONS7Ni:i1EHhdUde Facility Sunimarv ahd Sketch\'". . Flow Control T"ne/Descriotion Water Quality T"ne/Descriotion ~ Detention -.J.o.u It D Biofiltration 0 Infiltration [.ij° Wetpool W2-\ '}AA\-\- 0 Regional Facility D Media Filtration 0 Shared Facility D Oil Control ua Small Site BMPs ~\'rll~~J{NIPII 0 Spill Control 0 Other ~ Small Site BMPs -¥~e, ~~efl\ 0 Other 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 1/1/05 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 15 EASEMENTS{fRACTS Part 16 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS ~ Drainage Easement i2lJ Cast in Place Vault (8l Access Easement 0 Retaining Wall 0 Native Growth Protection Covenant 0 Rockery> 4' High ~ Tract 0 Structural on Steep Slope 0 Other 0 Other •.. Part 17 · SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER • I, or a civil engineer under my supervision, have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attached Technical Information Report. To the best of my knowledge the infor · ovided here is accurate. Si ned!Date 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 1/1/05 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PLEASANT JP A TH TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Project Overview 2. Conditions and Requirements Summary 3. Off-Site Analysis 4. Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design 5. Conveyance System Analysis and Design 6. Special Reports and Studies 7. Other Permits 8. CSWPPP Analysis and Design 9. Bond Quantities, Facility Summaries, and Declaration of Covenant IO.Operations and Maintenance Manual I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. PROJECT OVERVIEW: Pleasant Path is located in SW Y. Section 11, Township 23N Range SE on 148 1h Avenue SE, 0.3 miles north of the intersection of 148 1h Avenue SE and SE 128 1h Street in King County, Washington. See Figure I and Figure 2 on the following pages. The property will be made up of tax parcel 1123059092 and 1123059010 to create a property size of 4.54 acres. The parcels are divided by a wetland area. Only the 1.52 acres west of the wetland buffer will be the developed Pleasant Path. The site is bordered by 148 1h Avenue SE to the west, single family residences to the north and south, and wetlands to the east. The site is currently occupied by a single family residence and outbuildings. Ground cover is predominately grass and landscaping with gravel vehicular access. The entire property slopes to the southwest and sheet flows to the west property line. The eastern boundary of the site is the boundary setbacks of a treed and heavily brush covered wetland. The King County Basin map shows the runoff from the property flows into the Lower Cedar River basin. See the Downstream Analysis in Section 3 of this Report for a description of the downstream system The proposed project includes constructing 8 single-family residential lots with associated roadways and utilities on 1.43 acres of the property. All existing structures will be removed. Access to the site will be via ! 48'h Avenue SE. Half-street improvements on 148th Avenue SE along the property's west frontage, including pavement widening and installation of curb, gutter, and sidewalk, will be completed as part of the project. Developed drainage will be conveyed to a proposed combination water quality/detention facility that will be located in the southwestern comer of the property. The facility will discharge to an existing ditch downstream and south of the property within the 148 1h Avenue SE Right-of-Way. The site is subject to the Conservation (Level Two) Flow Control and Basic Water Quality requirements within the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual (2005 KCSWDM). I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I , I : ' VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Figure 1. Vicinity Map I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2. CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY: Attached on the following pages are the conditions of approval and Road Variance (File No. L07V0022), H. DECISION: Proposed Short Plat File No. L07S0018, received and revised on July 3, 2007 as described by Attachment I of this report is GRANTED PRELIMINARY APPROVAL; ,subject to the following conditions of final approval; 1. Title 19A a. This short plat will comply with all of the Land Segregation provisions of King County Code (KCC) Title 19A. b. The final short subdivision recording documents must be prepared by a professional land surveyor, licensed in the State of Washington. These documents shall comply with the conditions of the approval listed in this letter. c. The final review process must be completed prior to the recording of the short subdivision or the sale of any lots contained within. The Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) strongly recommends that the Final Short Plat review package be submitted to the department at least one year prior to the expiration date of the preliminary approval letter. d. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final short subdivision. e. All utilities within proposed rights-of-way must be included within a franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final short plat recording. Prior to recording KCC 19A.08.160 requires that the following is required: f. Prior to recording KCC 19A.08. l 60 requires that the following site work is completed: I. Drainage facilities and erosion control measures are consistent with K.C.C. 9.04.090; 2. Water mains and hydrants (if required) are installed and fire flow available; 3. Grading as necessary so that all the lots are accessible by passenger vehicle; 4. Specific site improvements are completed that are required and conditioned prior to plat recording or required to remove and safety hazard; 5. Undeveloped critical areas are delineated. 2. Surface Water Management (KCC 9) 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The proposed short plat qualifies for full drainage review as outlined in Chapter I of the SWDM. Final short plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04 as proposed in the conceptual drainage plan for this short plat. A professional civil engineer licensed in the State of Washington shall prepare drainage plans and a technical information report as outlined in Chapter 2 of the SWDM. The engineering/drainage plan submittal shall demonstrate compliance with all applicable core and special requirements. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved short plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval, which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the SWDM must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. a. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the SWDM. Prior to short plat recording, the applicant shall submit drainage and engineering plans to address the required short plat improvements. King County approval of drainage and roadway plans is required by county codes and policies. Bonding for the drainage plans will also be established as determined by ODES prior to plan approval. After receiving drainage plan approval, the applicant shall contact the DOES Land Use Inspection Section to schedule a pre-construction meeting prior to performing work on site. b. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by ODES Engineering Review shall be shown on the engineering plans. c. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: "All building roof downspouts and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings # on file with the DOES and/or the Department of Transportation. A copy of this plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval or certification of occupancy. For those lots designated for perforated stub outs, dispersion, or infiltration systems, the designs shall be constructed at the time of the building permit and shall comply with the plans on file." d. Storm water facilities shall be designed using the KCRTS Conservation flow control standard. Water quality facilities shall also be provided using the basic protection menu. The size of the proposed drainage facility and tract may have to increase to accommodate the required detention storage volumes and water quality facilities. All runoff control facilities shall be located in a separate tract and dedicated to King County unless portions of the drainage tract are used for recreation space in accordance with KCC 21A.14.180. 3. Road Standards (KCC 14) 1993 King County Road Standards I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Roadway improvements are required to address access requirements and impacts to existing roads and right-of-way. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the 1993 King County Road Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No. 11187, as amended (KCRS). The proposed short subdivision shall comply with the KCRS including the following requirements, unless otherwise approved by DDES: The extent of improvements ( conditioned below) requires submittal of engineering plan and profiles and appropriate review fees. Plans shall be prepared and stamped by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Washington and contain the applicable elements outlined in KCRS and/or the 2005 Surface Water Design Manual (see Section 2.2.2). Please note that the applicant should submit the plans a minimum of one year prior to the preliminary approval expiration date. a. 148th Avenue SE is classified as an urban collector arterial (KCRS 2.02). Urban frontage improvements (including curb, gutter and sidewalk) shall be constructed along the frontage. There shall be no direct vehicular access to 148th Avenue SE. A note to this effect shall be placed on the final recorded map page. b. The onsite road improvements shall be designed to conform to KCRS 2.03 for urban minor access roads. The improvements include: 22 feet of paving, curbs and a sidewalk on one side and one foot of right away width behind the sidewalk and curb. The intersection shall conform to the location of the approved variance (L07V0022) at 169 feet north of the centerline intersection of 148th Avenue SE and SE !23rd Street. c. Tract B shall be designed as a private access tract (PAT) serving proposed lots 6,7,8 and the future development Tract E. These lots and tract shall have undivided ownership of the tract and be responsible for cost for its maintenance as a prorated share of the number of dwelling units that use the tract for access. Improvements shall conform to KCRS 2.03 for urban minor access roads which include 22 feet of paving. The minimum tract width shall be 26 feet with a maximum length of 150 feet. d. Tract C (if required) shall be improved as a private joint use driveway (JUD) serving lots 6 and 7 and the future development Tract E. These lots and tracts shall have undivided ownership of the tract and be responsible for the cost of its maintenance on a prorated share of the number of dwelling units that use the tract. The tract will be configured to allow the construction of a 2007 KCRS alignment of a private access tract roadway. However, only the 1993 KCRS JUD will be required to be constructed for this short plat. As specified in KCRS 3.01 C, the driving surface shall be paved 18-feet in width) and have a minimum length of 20-feet measured from the edge of tract "B". Please look under DDES application packets at www.metrokc.gov/ddes/forms for detailed information on driveway connections. An ingress, egress and utility easement or tract can be extended from Tract "C" across lot 6 to tract "D" for the benefit of the owner of tract "E". The easement or tract shall be configured to allow for construction of a 2007 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I KCRS private access roadway (2005 KCRS 2.09) and this tract can be combined with the PAT "tract ''B". e. Tract F within the wetland shall be created to accommodate a future 2007 KCRS (2.09) private access roadway from tract C to tract E (if the owner(s) receives approval to subdivide tract E). The tract shall remain in a native state until the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) or succeeding agencies approved the construction of a roadway including a wetland mitigation that would be required by the approving agencies. See conditions 11 (I) and 11 (L) if an alternative access is provided. f. A cul-de-sac bulb shall be provided at the east terminus of onsite road consistent with KCRS 2.08. g. The property line at the intersection of the onsite road and 148th Avenue SE shall have a radius of 25 feet per KCRD 2.1 O.A.4. The intersection shall be constructed to urban minor access street standards. Modifications to the above road improvement conditions may be considered by King County pursuant to the variance procedures in KCRS 1.08. Any request for a road variance shall be submitted to DDES on the appropriate form and with the minimum fee deposit. Other engineering details that may be shown on the preliminary site plan with the exception of the above mentioned may not have been reviewed for compliance with KCRS. If differences exist, the final design shall be modified to meet KCRS. 4. Site Improvements Inspections, Fees and Financial Guarantees (Title 19 & 27 KCC) This short plat was conditioned to construct/reconstruct road access/right-of-way improvements and/or drainage facilities. Approved engineering plans, inspection fee and applicable financial guarantees are required prior to either starting construction or recording this short plat. At the time of engineering plan approval, you will be notified of the fee amount that will be required to inspect construction and the amount shall be deposited with DDES and the financial guarantee amount(s) required prior to scheduling of the pre-construction meeting. Please note that the pre-construction meeting is mandatory prior to the start of any work (including site clearing) or the recording of the short plat. 5. Health (KCC 13) This project is exempt from further King County Health Department review. However, if improvements are required from the sewer and/or the Water District, then verification shall be required from said District( s) that the improvements have been bonded and/ or installed, prior to final recording of the short plat. 6. Building and Construction Standards ( Title 16) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I A. The applicant shall comply with all the applicable provisions of KCC 16.82. B. To implement KCC 16.82 which applies to the site, a detailed tree retention plan shall be submitted with the engineering plans for subject short plat. The tree retention plan and engineering plans shall be consistent with the requirements of KCC 16.82. Flagging and temporary fencing of trees to be retained shall be provided, consistent with KCC 16.82. The placement of impervious surfaces, fill material, excavation work, or the storage of construction materials is prohibited within the fenced areas around preserved trees, except for grading work permitted pursuant to KCC 16.82. 7. Fire Code (KCC 17) Section 902 of the 2004 Edition of Uniform Fire Code The applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main and fire flow standards of Chapter 17 .08 of the King County Code. 8. Zoning Code (KCC 21A) A. Density and Dimensions (KCC 21A.12) All lots shall meet the density and dimensions requirements of the R-4 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary short subdivision, whichever is larger. Minor revisions to the short subdivision, which do not result in substantial changes and/or do not create additional lots may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services. B. Street Trees (KCC21 A.16) Street trees shall be provided as follows (per KCRS 5.03 and KCC 21A.16.050): a. Trees shall be planted at the rate of one tree every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. b. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. c. If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. d. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the County has adopted a I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. e. The species of trees shall be approved by DOES iflocated within the right-of-way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. f. The applicant shall submit a street plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by DOES prior to engineering plan approval. g. The applicant shall contact Metro Service Planning at 684-1622 to determine if 148th Avenue SE is on a bus route. If 148th Avenue SE is a bus route, the street tree plan shall also be reviewed by Metro. h. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DOES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. 9. Road Mitigation Payment System The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with the Road Mitigation Payment System (MPS), King County Code 14. 75, by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by King County Department of Transportation. The applicant has an option to either. A. Pay the MPS fee at final short plat recording, or (B) pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of short plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the short plat that reads, "All fees required by King County code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS) have been paid." If the second option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of the building permit application. I 0. Lots within this subdivision are subject to King County Code 21 A.43, which imposes impact fees to fund school system improvements needed to serve new development. As a condition of final approval, fifty percent (50%) of the impact fees due for the plat shall be assessed and collected immediately prior to recording, using the fee schedules in effect when the plat receives final approval. The balance of the assessed fee shall be allocated evenly to the dwelling units in the plat and shall be collected prior to building permit issuance. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l l. Suitable recreation space shall be provided consistent with the requirements of KCC 21A.14. a. A detailed recreation space plan shall be submitted for review and approval by DOES and King County Parks prior to or concurrent with the submittal of engineering plans. b. A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording of the plat. 12. Critical Areas: The proposed short subdivision shall comply with the Critical Areas Code as outlined in KCC 21 A.24. Impacts to critical areas shall be avoided where possible, and compensatory mitigation is required for approved adverse impacts. Preliminary short plat review has identified the following specific requirements that apply to this project. All other applicable requirements from KCC 21 A.24 shall also be addressed by the applicant. A. Wetland Category and Buffers (KCC 21A.24.325): This property contains part of a Category II wetland with fewer than 20 habitat points. The standard buffer width for this category of wetland is JOO feet of unaltered native vegetation between the wetland and residential uses. Structures must honor an additional IS-foot building setback beyond the buffer. Within a currently undeveloped buffer, no development of any kind is usually allowed, including clearing, grading, or any other alteration of the existing vegetation. B. Critical Areas tract (KCC 21A.24.180). The wetland and buffer on this property shall be placed in Critical Areas Tract to be shown on the engineering plans and final short plat. The Critical Areas Tract shall be held in an undivided interest by each owner of a building lot within the development, with this ownership interest passing with the ownership of the lot, or shall be held by an incorporated homeowner' s association or other legal entity that ensures the ownership, maintenance and protection of the tract. C. A minimum building setback line of 15 feet shall be required from the edge of the buffer (KCC 21A.24.200). D. Permanent survey marking, and signs shall be installed prior to final short plat approval (KCC 21A.24.160). E. Temporary marking of critical areas and their buffers (for example, bright orange construction fencing) shall be placed on the site and shall remain in place until all construction activities are completed. F. The following note shall be shown on the final engineering plan and recorded plat: RESTRICTION FOR CRITICAL AREA TRACTS AND CRITICAL AREAS AND BUFFERS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Dedication of a critical area tract/critical area and buffer conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the tract/critical area and buffer. This interest includes the preservation of native vegetation for all purposes that benefit the public health, safety and welfare, including control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The critical area tract/critical area and buffer imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the land subject to the tract/critical area and buffer the obligation, enforceable on behalf of the public by King County, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the tract/critical area and buffer. The vegetation within the tract/critical area and buffer may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged without approval in writing from the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services or its successor agency, unless otherwise provided by law. The common boundary between the tract/critical area and buffer and the area of development activity must be marked or otherwise flagged to the satisfaction of King County prior to any clearing, grading, building construction or other development activity on a lot subject to the critical area tract/critical area and buffer. The required marking or flagging shall remain in place until all development proposal activities in the vicinity of the critical area are completed. No building foundations are allowed beyond the required 15-foot building setback line, unless otherwise provided by law. G. No adverse impact to wetland hydrology shall result from this proposal. Engineering plans and calculations shall demonstrate that the pre-existing wetland hydrology will be maintained following construction of the development. H. Buffer reduction (21A.24.325.A.3.b): the buffer width will be reduced by 25 feet to a total of 75 feet in width, with a compensatory mitigation plan to remove off non-native plants and replace them with native vegetation to improve the degraded buffer condition. I. Future road access across the wetland and buffer to the Future Development Tract on the eastern portion of the property may be provided through a combination Access/Critical Areas Tract. If, in the future, access is provided to the Future Development Tract that does not require crossing the wetland, then that would preclude any road development on the Access/Critical Areas Tract. J. Compensatory mitigation (21 A.24.340): A conceptual mitigation plan shall be provided for ODES review and approval along with engineering plan review for the buffer reduction proposal and Access/Critical Areas Tract. K. A performance bond or other financial guarantee will be required at the time of engineering plan approval to guarantee that the buffer reduction mitigation measures are installed according to the plan. Once the mitigation work is completed to DOES Environmental Scientist's satisfaction, the performance bond may be replaced by a I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I maintenance bond for the remainder of the three year monitoring period to guarantee the success of the mitigation. The applicant shall be responsible for the installation, maintenance and monitoring of any approved mitigation. The mitigation plan must be installed prior to final inspection of the plat. If, in the future, an access road is to be built across the wetland and buffers in the Access/Critical Areas Tract to the Future Development Tract on the eastern portion of the property, in conformance with the relevant Critical Areas Regulations of the local agency with jurisdiction, then the applicant at that time will be required to provide a detailed plan to mitigate for impacts from the wetland and buffer alteration for review and approved by the local agency with jurisdiction. Other Considerations A. Preliminary approval of this application does not limit the applicant's responsibility to obtain any required permit or license from the State or other regulatory body. This may include, but not limited to, obtaining a forest practice permit, an HPA permit, building permits, and other types of entitlements as necessitated by circumstances. B. Development of the subject property may require registration with the Washington State Department of Licensing, Real Estate Division. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ® King County Road Services Division Department of Transportation KSC-TR-0222 201 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104-3856 October 22, 2007 Robert H. Stevens, P.E. 14 711 NE 29th Place, Suite 101 Bellevue WA 98007 · RE: Road Variance L07V0022 -Johnseine Short Plat Dear Mr. Stevens: Thank you for your application for a variance from the 1993 King County Road Standards (KCRS). You requested a variance from Section 2.10 of the KCRS concerning the intersection spacing for.the proposed access onto 148th Avenue SE. ·This road is classified as a collector arterial, and theKCRS requires a minimum of300 feet of intersection spacing. The proposed location of the site access is 169 feet north of SE 123 rd Street and is supported by · the Department of Development and Environmental Services. The access accommodates future development to the west. Moving the access to the north property line is not viable because a 15- _foot landscaping tract owned by a homeowner's association obstructs a potential half-street. 1 approve a variance for reduced intersection spacing for the access road as proposed at 169 feet north of SE !23rd Street. · This decision applies only to KCRS identified in the variance request. All other design requirements in the KCRS and other regulations, such as surface water management and zoning, must still be satisfied for a land use permit application. The applicant retains the rights and privileges afforded by King County Code and adopted Public Rules pertaining to road variance processing (KCC-14.42, PUT 10-2). This variance decision is valid for one year from date of letter unless an associated land use permit is pending or submitted within the one year period. In these cases, the variance decision is valid for the duration of the permit processing. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. · Robert H. Stevens, P .E. October 22, 2007 Page 2 A copy of staft's analysis, findings, and conclusions is enclosed. If you have any questions, please call Craig Comfort, Road Variance Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, at 206-263~6 I 09. Sincerely, J C~.(1t.lf1> A..h·P//!f1~,_ Paulette Norman, P .E. County Road Engineer Enclosure cc: , James Sanders, P.E., Development Engineer, Land Use Services Division (LUSD), Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) Pete Dye, P.E., Senior Engineer,LUSD, ODES Linda Dougherty, Division Director, Road Services Division (RSD), Department of Transportation (DOT) Matthew Nolan, P .E., County Traffic Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD; DOT Fatin Kara, P .E., Supervising Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section; RSD, DOT Kris Langley, Senior Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT Craig Comfort, P.E., Road Variance Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3. OFFSITE ANALYSIS: Upstream Tributary Area The area to be developed currently does not receive any upstream drainage. The wetland to the east of the site receives all of the drainage from the east and conveys it to the north and south of the site. Downstream Analysis RESOURCE REVIEW The site is located within the Lower Cedar River Drainage Basin which is within the Cedar River/Lake Washington Watershed. Resources listed in the KCSWDM were reviewed for existing/potential problems within the study area, i.e. the site and within I- mile of the site along the downstream drainage route. King County Soils Survey: The soils on site are Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. See Soils Map in Section 3A of this Report. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FEMAMaps: FEMA map dated May 16, 1995 nwnbered 53033C0982 F was reviewed. located within a flood plain. See Figure 3. The site is not / ' II" ' -----ll=:::::JI~ I ~u s,•<,t \ CITY OF RENTON B0088 --- ""''''•·"" •.. ""'"' I ZONE X LECENO em~=-=- I ,:._;;.. ...... _ -· =.::.:: .. -=..-=..= lfZi! .:.:.:::: ;';.: = am-· ¥-ffi:a~ o---··---· ::..:..---· ~ g r;m --..:'"----·---·-·- ·~· - - ZONI X Figure 3. FEMA map numbered 53033C0982 F • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Sensitive Areas Folio iMAP: The King County iMAP was reviewed to confirm whether or not wetlands, strean1s or floodplain areas, erosion hazard areas, landslide hazard areas, or seismic hazard areas are located within the study area. A portion of a larger wetland, wetland number 23b, is located on the east side of the property. No other sensitive areas are located within the one mile downstream study area. See Figure 4. )( Moun1ain Peaks ltigl ... 'ilY,, Stroots ;,:J. . .,,. ... l " ,...,,,,,, 1P "''" SAO Stream 1 0-1 Om3. 2 :ia-crnd /V Q.:rH 2 ~fflO'td ;,I Cm,) 'U~cd l ! o@.i · ,-·Wetland 23 lig. I \ ; . I . I \ ; i ~J r.5°\ " -.......... ·.. 1 • ··-· -~ _J ~~ ···11--·1 i ·.,.,,, ·-; ..... -, -~ I ' I ' t i ' Ii i-·· i I 1J.1 / '1 ... ·1r~.--. "i. , :::1 . , i :~: I ·1···· , •. • .. r:-· rrc ,·-:.o:~~ t 11•• ; I I1,·-· ·. • I 1. :::: I 1 , ,· • --• 1 ••• r... . . ·-· , , \ :}::. j ·1,-·I ~ j . ~ . j l ·-· ·-1 I._:-· ·-· \,;. :1 : : "°' -~,. , ··· ·-' ·-· I ,..(·V\ , · '._, i EndofStiJdYAr••. .. 1._i • '+\,i;,,f 1 f '1 ·-·, I I ... _..,..;... ff~!\ jt ! ·==· '··-~ . D Lu1loi. ond Lu~o Rhrors ;,I Stroum,. I!] 100 Year Floodplain 00 SAO Wetland ~ SAO Lun<lslido mll SAO C<rn1 Minu ~ SAO Seisn'Dc: l .i SAO EroSIOn Figure 4. Sensitive Areas iMAP I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Drainage Complaints Maps: From the King County drainage complaint records on iMap there were four complaints found within the one mile downstream study area of the site. See Figure 5. - Figure 5. iMap Drainage Complaints Researching the complaints, none were directly related to the storm water conveyance or the property being developed. Complaints D and B were over BCW membership and S WM fees. Complaint A was a dispute over a neighbor grading his property. The property has since been developed. Complaint C was from grey water discharge from a home. Complaints A and C follow. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I E I I Complaint A King County Complaints #1996=1771 #1996=0323 #1996=0157 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _..;;JAi. 29. 2007 3:55PM -KING CO. WLRO NO. 1165 P. 18/29 --KING COUITTY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT Page 1: INVl!STIGATION'Rl!QUEST . • ReoelVed by: .(.~ . . . Dato: /~~2;llk OK!d by,'~ Filo No. ~ Rt1tJtJ/v11d from: OA\J#'• bu.i:LAA 1c W...._f!crDM print plllnly for soannlng). .. (Day) (I!,,) NAME: .:ht1N 'i: \!g €:r,J K+qZUl--p.Ig .. , PH~4-c:r7oo ADbRl!SS: I 2,227 , l 4 B n/ JJ.r > <= City J?.,.,,.,-ro «l Stato~~Zl-p--:. _'i_i>._1:1S'_9 Loca~on of problem, If different: Roportod Prob/om: i),w..,· \S C.L.~1 ·.._, t: fi..,._ ·\/,! ~<-0~'-Y '?-""c9-"'3''. 'TfnrY /V .. ?:-'l) To 5'.nt. /'M!7,r .5 .,fc..RF.S $vt' l'V-0 ;:;,..,,.,.-:l'R::n,,JJ c.,,-o. A-s:.-,r_.,,,~.~ {o 1""7<)L "" _s;,,....,.-J:)""41,y./lecF /~,a:v E'S:. So,-H '?,t.~'""""-r,.,..s ~~ ........ .,. "' rPF &.,,/tArN-' ... -r;:, ~..Jr/I ~ ,(. ,t.{.,lt.$.P."(. Noe.rt-I ',A ?irU'c...;; 4-r; r.......-4,,,,.r..,.,,, ~ tf,r. • .J<WT 1...J nt.-t ,d':, ... ,,.. .II ..e'e.<;"I:, A~'\? D1,t!iarr-o J:)A-+r,-/A-e:; ,,,,..,,., 7i'/r<F/I:! · ~.J~--,,.,-J'. 0·7?1>,-· <'.--r ro n,;,,r l'/,,<-r-'>' ~ dt.-s-,s, ~,.........,...,.,, · /7&-'· /Uo:f< ·.4,,r CS 111,...., r!W' lf!.,,.-c-.,..,p'<D h<-.,..,,,..,-.,;.1--n,,e, !et/.: ·Ct-L-t...' [hv.r Atoll n, /w~uo~,v /c3 N:-e;,., Ou .. tY1s /fwc'l'VO "frl7'1'"<:¢ •. -bAI . Platnatne: ~../ Lot NO! Block No: Other agencJea Involved; No,Fleld Investigation Needed ' : (!nlllal9J l"lMl~PF'fillffl!llN~n;m:wrw,rnm:. e ;/4 ~-T---R-Parcel No •. _-'-------KroU __ _ Th.Bros:=N~ew,._ __ _ , Old Basin_ Counoa Dfst Charg; No: RESPONSEr Citizen notlfled,on ~ by ..Jl:L phone letter In parson ~I~ ~"t('I<~ .f.o e,(l>'o'<!.. ~,k -le:, "i)'!)E:5. 6-cw_ tr--I '"'""'....,=? ....,.. ~ e .. 4~ -fl.;· ~ u:.,.... (,.!"'re.. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •...... JAN. 29. 2007 3:55PM , __ KING CO. WLRD ______ _ Kin,County DepartJ.ncnt of Natural Rcsowwa Surfhco Water Management DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REl'ORT· FJBU) INUITl~TION PllJI N09'°1771 NAM!!: ZOHN KA.\JZLAlUCH ADl>aBN: UU1 14mt AVI U nlOMI .fJ'"'700 MAlNl1!NANCB 4 _ ___ NO. 316_5_P. 19c.,/;;.2J_, .,. ..... ~l'>!I 'l'HOMAS PAOI mn DATB 10.a.J4f INrrlAU DCD DETAILS OF INVESTIGATION: DaveKauzlarlcli b the son of the property ownen. Dave b concerned that tho property bu been damaged with all the actlvl17 at the nursery to the 1outb and the nelahbors to the north of them. A wetlRlld now eslslJ.OD the baclalde ofthe property. Dave feels with all the.acdvllf or the · other propeller they. are now tho duinplng ground for all the 1urface water Dows. I walked the paiture on the baclalde ofthe property and round the wetland llave was talking about but could not find a db-eel Dow path of fhe water from tho nursery or the north property. It appear, the water ponds on the Kauzlarich'• ·, property thnn fiow.1 to the 11ortb. I wlll check the 1eusltive anas maps to flnd out what Jr locnted on the badulde of thil propety. .SKETCH: ' .............................................................................................. I ·········-~·-················································································································· II ii • I I I ii I I •· r· I I r I r 1. r I r I ! I JAN. 29. 2007 3:54PM -' . KING CO. WLRD N0.3165 P. 13/2.9~. KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION · DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORT · --) · (l'ca. c,., f Page 1: INVESTIGATION REQUEST . Type C., · rr,m yq}/YJ CCJmlf:!!,.t1 . : _A A J . R•celved by: /j'/e/( 'lhofYlpS0/1 .. tllne) Dale:~:if!/9fa ·-DK'd by: . :.Jlt.9.... FIio. N~: "9' & "3 ,;;/3 -· /i9,:;sfvsd fram": . ~ (Pltau print p!alnly for acannlng). (Day) (Ev,) PHONE ,1,,:j'--0/93 _··---NAME, vaa uhlfon ADDRESS: /g:}:) 7 -µ/_8/h /Jt/(', 8l City. ~) ~ta<e ___ Zlp fj't7j l.~anton of problem, 1f different: md'IJOe. She ' Lo: No: 81ocl( No: · O'lhar agancla.s Involved: No Fiald lnves.ig1tlon Neidad __ ._ ___ s_••_'"-~-.L..-Co~~~~~~s_i_/._;.2 __ -~C:'.h:or:.':g:::•.:_N:::o::: ===== RESPONSE: Citizen notified on ___ by _ phone_ letter _ In person DJSPDS!TION,: Tu"med to ___ on----by ---OP.; No furthet' action taeommended bece Le.td egenoy has beein notttled: = FroblE.!m l)as bean correcledi -_-::N~o-pr~o~bl-em~h-es~b~e~e-n'ld~e~n,~ili-,d~. ---~P~,~lo-, l~n,-e-st'ig-a'tlo-n-.,,.,d"d,-.~.,-,-, -p,::coblr -S.• Filo"-----_ Pri\1~u, problem • NDAP wlll not consider btccuse: _ Water 9rlglnates onslle and/or on neighboring parcel Location Is outslds SWM SeNlce Area. _ Other (Specify): DATE C~OSED: ....!i_/~ 'J(. by, .::::flJ/ . SG§'. 'lt~fJl 57 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -JAN. 29. 2007 3:54PM -KING CO. WLRO -N0.3165 P. 11/29 - KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION ~PORT . , . Paga l: INVESTIGATION REQUEST Type (!_. Rece~ad hY:JleO ,-.. ···---· · ________ o.ie; ... 2} "] /'f (,,OK'd by:~j{:~L ___ m' No .. CJ G,-/ 5J __ , R9c.elvsd lrcim; · "K..1cl.c. iV\ O '()\ ~ £.ON{P1•1m print pl•lrity for ,eannlng). (Day) 1ev,J NAME: __ 1-'--'--'1 N..ccAcc.----'-'\A,,_/ '°'tl(.__,tp-"'--'-N'-----c-. __ · __ PHONE Z'S'S-C, 19 :;::i,.._' __ 'IZ:Z2. ':1:-.li./Sfh IIWE:-<,£. Chy, Re.,,mi°N Stat•-._· z1/l~c,sq ADDRESS: Location of problem, if different Ropor'tttd Problem: . · ~e.e.. # '9'461'2.e: N~hbov. 'is. /;, "'-Cl::.. J,,,oe. , ~I S uJ....f.-1~.- ~~~;1r13 tN ~ I~ he-!; -e.veol +.:, Lo;: No: Slock No: No Fls!d ln'-'es;lg2tlon Nnde::1 --- Basin t.,.C/2...,. Council Dist--1£.__ Charge No: -~---------·--·--~::::.:=..:.:::::::::::=~ R!:SPONSE: Cltlze:n notified ori Z,Z81t, by -,1£ phone~ lener ~ in person · 1 1 bCI-~~ .\.k9 fl..b .....,,,v!J -1,~ ,;;-e,,,-I -1o ~..lo ~· , .... ;i,A() 01.u...;,_ q,.....,J., A~ c.-~'l-'l<--lo '1;,,'l:>e:s_ ~ DISPOSITION,: Turn~d to __ on----by __ _ OR: No further action recoinmended.~ect 1::\aad ec;ency has be,n riotlflad:. /) !) !f;5" r-;,at>D,d C _ Problem he.~ been corrected, ---"'-'-':N-c'o"'p""ro~bl~e"";;;-?Ci;.,"'b,.,.e"'en~ld.;,on"'tif"it~O.----P~,i~o,~1-nv-._.~ll~ga~tlro~n -,-ed"'d"'re~ss"e.,.., ))"'r,,.o'bl -So. Fill I ____ _ _ Prive.re problem -NDAP wf/1 nor consider because: _ Water originates onslta e.nd/or On neighboring parcel _ Locallo~ !• outside SWM S•.:;;:;,-_ Other (Spoclty): DATE CLOSED: _d_; ;15}1_2!{ b\c ,('r()J),/7e,-:J"($e'/)([; I I • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •. JAN. 29. 2007. 3:54PM KING CO. WLRO ----. ------·-· ... NO. 3165 P. 12/29 complaint 96-0167 Walton, Tina Investigated by Doug Dobkins on 2-21-96 I met with Mr. Walton onslte to discuss his concerns with the work being done on the nursery property to the south. According to Mr. Walton the nursery has been clearing land that could be considered a wetland. I walked the back property line of Mr. Walton's property and discovered that he also has dona •ome work In the wetland to install a fence. Mr. Walton cleared In the wetland end disturbed a small slream. I told .Mr. Walton that he needs to talk to ODES Grading section about a penmlt to do this work and to stop work In the wetland. I tried to access the property of the nursery to the south but was unsuccsssful because they were closed. The nursery eppeara to have encroached the wetland with Its clearing. I suggest sending this complaint to ODES Grading section for !heir investigation. ssoa· ::'!____~l::"::'=""::"::":ll::'ran:::::'::'"'::ill:ir.:j . ..:::> c.. I V -t:: ...j -!) ---,----'Nt.f0-23-5 "·"~' ,,w. -----== SCALE: , ... -,oo· ,iksi t:au.,, __ _ ,,.,,~- @ n I it . I I ' ,-,to, { ~·----i----------=,---"'~---·.~ -I'-"·.. ,.;J ----·-.-· I -. VI .. :I ... ..I ·~J i~ ·--··----------·-·----~--2.l~J~. . . ,. ~ .. ! '" I I I I I I I I I Complaint C I King County Complaint I #1998-534 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Location of problem, if differcn't: ~. •· TO BE COMPUTED BY COMPLAINT Pl(OGl<AM STAFF •.-'. ., :: . ·· ..... ·• ~ ·':,• • Bas.in. L C,1' Council Distrlot .12.... K:,;oll~· Th.Bros: New &.sfcTJ?, Old <J{f0Q ChargeNo~. ------- RESPONSE: Citiz~ notified on -----by: __ phone __ letter __ m·person . . . ~o<!;i~rr:y-l!li'!f~lll:!!'Cl!!":fied:. ____________________ _ ~L='•:m~h~ub:eo~nc:;co~rrrw"""--No probl~m has been identified. _ Prior investigation i.;ldresses problem: ,"i,\ SUFILC# --- Priv,ate problem~ NDAP will not consider because: __ Water originates onsite and/or On neighboring parcel. __ Location is outsjde WLRD ~rvi~e3.: __ Other (Specify): )ATECLOSED: /2 12010{ By:~I( · . . . /"~L6Jl1(},,e~ I I I I I I I I I I • • • I I I I FEB. 9. 2007 12:34PM Kl NG CO. WLRD --------·-·-. nate: Mo.nib 26, lOOl Dato oflnvu{!gutlo1H l>cccmher 14"', 2000 ll'M: o.uy..Paul Reinko RE: WQ Evaluatlon for Complnfnt # 98--0534 Shayla and Casoy Cox 13224 • 14~ Avonuo SB Rontoll, WA. 98055 bay ~CONNECTED (tho Cox f11mlly hu moved on) OYnJcr~-768-1062 .l!lwllru,., NO. 3377 P. J I havo been chocldng this sfto wbonovcr I wu,in the area to sec ifl could f'md 11Df C'Videnco of tho problems the Cox's have monlfoned. I have notfc_>und Illy evidence ofhou10 pipes exiting to Iha stream or any othor part of tho property. The Cox's hnvr. ml:Jvcd on and thore is a now family in the. house now. They had uoidea. of what I wu1olldttg about. I did contact tho owner (Roget Brendan) of the property and he ,aid tho previous tenauta badDl.ldo the Ult1sal connection. 'Ihe fonnor ccnanta aro now JODC acd tho illegal -pipo hu bQn plugged up. Numerous visits tQ tho lite cont1nn, this i., no longer 11. ptoblcm. Optton, ond Dlrsntdon ' Al I stated, I haven't found any ovidencc of thoprobl(UU in about 8 apot chcoks on Cho plm.o. The oveall condition of tho property is poor and there is lots of Junk lyine about but nothing thnt would seem to afftct water quality. Prono.red 8oluHon 1 1uggest we closo tho compln!nt. r i,, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FIELD INVESTIGATION The downstream field investigation was conducted on January 30th, 2007. The weather was cool, 55 degrees and sunny. There had been no precipitation in over a week. The downstream analysis begins at the site (point A). See Downstream Analysis Existing Course Figure 6 on the following pages. The drainage flows through a vegetated open channel south for approximately 129 ft in front of the site (point 8). Flow then enters a 12" concrete pipe flowing approximately 22 ft under the driveway of the neighboring lot (point C). Flow exits the pipe into approximately 121 ft of vegetated channel in front of 12232 and 12240 148 1h Avenue SE (point D). Flow continues approximately 69 ft through a 12" concrete pipe under the driveways of 12240 and 12250 1481h Avenue SE (point E). Leaving the pipe, flow continues through approximately 79 ft of vegetated channel in front of 12250 and 12260 1481h Avenue SE (point F). Continuing flowing south, flow enters approximately 19 ft of 12" concrete pipe under the driveway of 12260 148'h Avenue SE (point G). Flow discharges from the pipe into approximately 54 ft of vegetated channel (point H). 12" CMP collects flow from the channel and directs flow approximately 24 ft (point I). Flow leaves the CMP falling into the catch basin at the NE corner of the 1481h Avenue SE and SE 1241h Street intersection (point J). Flow exits the catch basin to the east through approximately 21 ft of CPEP into a catch basin on SE 1241h Street (point K). Flow is redirected from the west to the southwestern direction at the catch basin (point L). Leaving the catch basin through approximately 43 ft 15" CPEP flow continues in the southwestern direction (point M). A catch basin on the SE corner of the 148th Avenue SE and SE 1241h Street receives the flow from the pipe (point N). A 15" CPEP takes the flow approximately 34 ft under the sidewalk improvements and discharges into a vegetated channel (point 0). The open vegetated channel takes the flow approximately 75 ft south in front of 12414 1481h Avenue SE. (point P). From the channel, the flow is taken through approximately 71 ft of 12" CPEP (point Q). The CPEP transitions into approximately 69 ft of concrete pipe (point R). The flow exits the concrete pipe into a concrete structure (point S). Leaving the concrete structure through a 12" concrete pire, the flow continues approximately 224 ft south in front of 12430, 12438, and 12444 1481 Avenue SE. (point T). The flow exits the concrete pipe into a concrete structure (point U). Flow continues south through 12" concrete pipe for approximately 34 ft under the driveway of 12610 1481h Avenue SE (point V). Flow exits the pipe into the channel in front of 12610 1481h Avenue SE to continue flowing south for approximately 115 ft (point W). Flow leaves the channel through a trash rack into 18" CPEP for approximately 14 ft (point X). Flow exits the pipe into a catch basin (point Y). Flow exits the catch basin through approximately 84 ft of 18" CPEP (point Z). Flow exits the CPEP into a catch basin (point AA). Leaving the catch basin, flow continues for approximately 139' through 18" CPEP along 1481h Avenue SE (point AB). Flow exits the pipe into a catch basin (point AC). From the catch basin, flow continues approximately 95 ft south through 18" CPEP (point AD). The 18" CPEP empties into a catch basin at the end of the Y. mile study area end (point AE). No drainage, erosion, or sediment buildup problems were found during the field investigation. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 6. Downstream Analysis Existing Course LEGEND I OPEN CHANNEL I CONCRETE ICMP I CPEP cCATCH BASlN ~CONCRETESTRUCTURE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LEGEND I OPEN CHANNEL I CONCRETE ICMP I CPEP a CATCH BASIN o coNCRETESTRUCTURE Figure 6. D owns tream Analysis Existing Course Continued I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4. FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN: A. Hydraulic Analysis The drainage analysis was modeled using the King County Runoff Time Series software. The onsite soils are Alderwood (AgC), KCRTS group Till per the Soils Map attached on the following pages. The site is located in the Landsburg rainfall region with a location scale factor of0.85. EXISTING CONDITIONS EXISTING BASIN BOUNDARY The existing drainage basin boundary will include the property area, 197,974 square feet, less Tract D which will remain undisturbed, 90,532 square feet, less Tract E which is a future development area, 45,000 square feet, plus the 1481h Avenue SE frontage area between the existing edge of pavement and the right-of-way, 3,801 square feet. Existing ground cover will be modeled as Till-Forest. The following information was used for generating time series and flow frequencies. EXISTING CONDITIONS Total Area= 66,243 sq. ft. or 1.52 acres (06083ex) GROUND COVER AREA(acre) Till-Forest 1.52 I I (RENTON QUAI: I .- I I I I .,. An I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3.2.2 KCRTSIRUNOFF FILES METHOD-GENERATING TIME SERIES ~1j.l'f~~ ........ ,. «>'.",::-{;~.-., .. ,,, ...... '•, ... ~··"': ._., ··: • -._ ·:·~·-~·,t;;···-......... _ ...... "C .. "~"f,~;;..J,i./' •• ~-~~_ .. _ ... ~->.-·,~·--·-:;<~, ... ,, : . \·:~iABLi{31:l°,2:a.'ifQi.iIVAL:ENGE BET\VEEN scs'son:f.rv'r.Ekt;(~jfrKCRl'S 1SOTLc,fypifs~ •.,f A~•·c..-..-;:. ·..:~::,i,:~::~.?~_J...-,l ~-'_ ~ '~ ·-; ·~ ·::, ... , ~-.-,•r:.~ •. ·,._, -...-:: (!'· ,.,,·;_;,;;:"'J .. S.': ;;) _; 'i'1'1.~~' --~. ,!i~~.;~. ~ '' i>_:,_·i,1 --,;;:,.:,i:f', ;: -i'..-.. ~,X"t.,~-1.~.:.,; SGS Soil Type SGS KGRTS Soil Notes Hydrologic Group Soil Groun ( Alderwood (AgB, Age, AgD) e Till ) Arems, Alaerwooa Material (AmB. AmC) e Till Arents, Everett Material (An) B Outwash 1 Beausite (Bee, BeD, BeF) C Till 2 Bellingham (Bh) D Till 3 Brisco! (Br) D Till 3 Buckley (Bu) D Till 4 Earlmont (Ea) D Till 3 Edgewick (Ed) e Till 3 Everett (EvB, Eve, EvD, Ewe) A/B Outwash 1 Indianola (lne, lnA, lnD) A Outwash 1 Kitsap (KpB, Kpe, KpD) e Till Klaus (Kse) e Outwash 1 Neilton (Nee) A Outwash 1 Newberg (Ng) B Till 3 Nooksack (Nk) C Till 3 Norma (No) D Till 3 Orcas (Or) D Wetland Oridia (Os) D Till 3 Ovall (Ove, OvD, OvF) e Till 2 Pilchuck (Pc) C Till 3 Puget (Pu) D Till 3 Puyallup (Py) B Till 3 Ragnar(RaC,RaD,Rae,RaE) B Outwash 1 Renton (Re) D Till 3 Salal (Sa) e Till 3 Sammamish (Sh) D Till 3 Seattle (Sk) D Wetland Shalcar (Sm) D Till 3 Si (Sn) e Till 3 Snohomish (So, Sr) D Till 3 Sultan (Su) e Till 3 Tukwila (Tu) D Till 3 Woodinville (Wo) D Till 3 Notes: 1. Where outwash soils are saturated or underlain at shallow depth (<5 feet) by glacial till, they should be treated as till soils. 2. These are bedrock soils, but calibration of HSP.F by King County DNRP shows bedrock soils to have similar hydrologic response to till soils. 3. These are alluvial soils, some of which are underlain by glacial till or have a seasonally high water table. In the absence of detailed study, these soils should be treated as till soils. 4. Buckley soils are formed on the low-permeability Osceola mudflow. Hydrologic response is assumed to be similar to that of till soils. 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 1/24/2005 3-25 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6.4.1 WETPONDS -BASIC AND LARGE -METHODS OF ANALYSIS FIGURE 6.4.1.A PRECIPITATION FOR MEAN ANNUAL STORM IN INCHES (FEET) ST 1,0 ST 1.1 0.54" {0.045') rz::zJ Incorporated Area --oo River/Lake Major Road 0.47" {0.039') 0.47" {0.039') NOTE: Areas east of the easternmost lsop1uvial should use 0.65 inches unless rainfall data Is available for the location of interest 24 The mean annual storm ls a conceptual storm found by dividing the annual preclpHatlon by the total number of storm events per year :LUU5 Sllrface Water Design Manual 6-71 LA 1.0 LA 1.2 SMOHOMl1H C0\1"1Y ~ING COUNH 1/24/2005 I I Flow Frequency Analysis LogPearson III Coefficients Time Series File:06083ex.tsf Mean= -1. 272 StdDev-0.226 I Project Location:Landsburg Skew-0.101 ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak --Peaks Rank Return Prob I (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.061 21 2/16/49 21:00 0.170 1 89.50 0.989 0 .144 3 3/03/50 16:00 0.165 2 32 .13 0. 969 I 0.120 4 2/09/51 18:00 0.144 3 19.58 0.949 0.044 33 1/30/52 8:00 0.120 4 14.08 0.929 0.035 40 1/18/53 19:00 0.103 5 10.99 0.909 0.047 28 1/06/54 6:00 0.102 6 9.01 0.889 I 0.055 24 2/07/55 22:00 0. 096 7 7. 64 0.869 0.049 25 12/11/55 16:00 0. 091 8 6.63 0.849 0.044 31 12/09/56 17:00 0.091 9 5.86 0.829 I 0.035 41 1/17/58 7:00 0.086 10 5.24 0.809 0.042 36 1/24/59 15:00 0.077 11 4.75 0.789 0.063 19 11/21/59 2:00 0.075 12 4.34 0.769 0.047 29 11/20/60 15:00 0.073 13 3.99 0.749 I 0.023 47 12/17/61 7:00 0. 071 14 3.70 0. 729 0.043 34 2/03/63 3:00 0.067 15 3.44 0.709 0.073 13 6/18/64 17:00 0.066 16 3.22 0.690 0.059 22 1/29/65 7:00 0. 064 17 3.03 0. 670 I 0.020 49 1/05/66 16:00 0. 064 18 2.85 0.650 0.034 42 12/13/66 11: 00 0.063 19 2.70 0.630 0. 046 30 6/03/68 6:00 0.061 20 2.56 0.610 I 0.075 12 6/23/69 21:00 0.061 21 2.44 0.590 0.034 43 12/13/69 21:00 0.059 22 2.32 0.570 0.066 16 1/09/71 0:00 0.057 23 2.22 0.550 0.077 11 2/28/72 16:00 0.055 24 2.13 0.530 I 0.036 39 1/13/73 5:00 0.049 25 2.04 0.510 0.032 44 2/19/74 0:00 0.049 26 1. 96 0.490 0.091 8 12/27/74 2:00 0.048 27 1. 89 0.470 I 0.061 20 12/02/75 21:00 0.047 28 1. 82 0.450 0.015 50 3/03/77 2:00 0.047 29 1. 75 0.430 0.064 18 12/02/77 23:00 0.046 30 1. 70 0.410 0.039 38 2/06/79 19:00 0.044 31 1. 64 0.390 I 0. 067 15 12/15/79 12:00 0.044 32 1. 59 0.370 0.086 10 11/21/80 11: 00 0.044 33 1. 54 0.350 0.049 26 1/23/82 20:00 0.043 34 1. 49 0.330 0.071 14 1/05/83 10:00 0.042 35 1. 45 0.310 I 0.102 6 1/24/84 16:00 0.042 36 1. 41 0.291 0.031 45 11/01/84 23:00 0.039 37 1. 37 0. 271 0.057 23 1/18/86 21:00 0.039 38 1. 33 0.251 I 0. 096 7 11/24/86 5:00 0.036 39 1. 30 0.231 0.048 27 3/27 /88 11:00 0.035 40 1. 27 0.211 0.039 37 1/09/89 22:00 0.035 41 1. 24 0 .191 0.103 5 1/09/90 7:00 0.034 42 1. 21 0.171 I 0. 091 9 11/24/90 14:00 0.034 43 1.18 0.151 0.044 32 4/18/92 18:00 0.032 44 1.15 0.131 0.042 35 3/23/93 0:00 0.031 45 1.12 0 .111 0.023 48 3/03/94 3:00 0.031 46 1.10 0.091 I 0. 064 17 2/19/95 18:00 0.023 47 1. 08 0.071 0.165 2 2/09/96 0:00 0.023 48 1. 05 0.051 0.170 1 9/17/97 11: 00 0.020 49 1. 03 0.031 I 0.031 46 10/30/97 7:00 0.015 50 1. 01 0. 011 06083ex.PKS Page I of2 I I I Computed Peaks 0.186 100.00 0.990 Computed Peaks 0.160 50.00 0.980 I Computed Peaks 0.135 25.00 0. 960 Computed Peaks 0.105 10.00 0.900 Computed Peaks 0.099 8.00 0.875 Computed Peaks 0.082 5.00 0.800 I Computed Peaks 0.053 2.00 0.500 Computed Peaks 0.036 1. 30 0.231 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 06083ex.PKS Page 2 of2 I ·~~===;=;==;=;=;=;;=;===;===;=;,;'i"F'F'i';;======;=o========= I r~ ;:~:~~---_ 1, 1 1r \r~x ~-____ ,_2->\I -s ,, . 2 so ---l \ ., J I _,,, ·. :1 C8 l YP, • -~,: ; ~1·: J\ II . , l, : r le • ,, I Rlii 515. 49 .-. ~ . ' : .V i E N 513.12 .........--..----1,-,,;3!1!::i;:;w-·/ -- : W 512.94 I: I ~ ~:----• -4jl--J J-,~ ~ le: L1 \ I.I Ii 1-l I ' CONC p I / ~ N . .._! IE ::.._ 7 ;;-EXISTING BASIN 111 [::;;: ~-PP W/ = ( ) w j TRANSFOI BOUNDARY 1.52 AC I ~ I \ CB TYPE 1~ ,M \~ ~~':" _ DEVELOPED BASIN I " RIM 514.01 '-..~ ~( G~-b·)::01 BOUNDARY (1.52 AC) I I I I I 12 IE S 510.41 ~~ J .,, 'l-. 1' -/£· I ~•• 12" IE N 510.46 .-."-,._ 14 _ "'--.J_t.+m:::i:r:-tt m -·-·---./ I ____ )_ 11-------lc;-. ~- ·, ,: • N \ \ i--.. / \g_ ~-.C. PIF'l ~ C , J' .78 / ~ ''Y. i/ I\ I rv CB TYPE 1~ ; RIM 509.94 I 12" IE N 506.64 ,; '." IE SW 505.74 '.J\ .L \,.I ,,_---~ .. I{ \ \/ . I fPE 1 /? . 0 ,)8.37~ /~ ••• , .~:: C,, ··~ ""'~J ~ It! I ' .s, ,.--1,\ ';, I i'... m\..12" CONC. i' ~ IE 507.97 i '-...cuLVERT DU -BURIED I I I SSMH RIM 508.66' :; ~ _-. ~ 8" IE W 501.58 .> I ,_ I 30' 30j SCALE: 1 " = 40' 9 10 20 @@m ~DESIGN 40 14711 #«2911,Pb»,#101 ,-..._,w~ 98007 42$.88.S.7177 l'u 425.88$.7963 ENGINEElllNG · PLANNING· SURVEYING SITE PLAN PLEASANT PATH DATE APRIL 2006 DESIGNED NWD DRAWN NWD PROJECT NUMBER 06083 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DEVELOPED CONDITIONS The proposed project includes constructing eight single-family residential lots with associated roadways and utilities. Access to the site will be via the onsite road accessing !48'h Avenue NE. Half-street improvements on 148'h Avenue SE along the property's western frontage , including pavement widening and installation of curb, gutter, and sidewalk, will be completed as part of the subject project. FLOW CONTROL BMP REQUIREMENTS Per Section 1.2.3.3 in the 2005 KCSWDM, projects subject to Core Requirement #3 must apply flow control BMPs to impervious surfaces as directed by this section to either supplement the flow mitigation provided by required flow control facilities or provide flow mitigation where flow control facilities are not required. Flow control BMPs must be selected and applied according to the basic requirements, procedures, and provisions detailed in Section 5.2 and the design specifications for each BMP in Appendix C, Section C.2. This project is implementing the flow control BMPs with the development of the site. The implementing of flow control BMPs during site development is optional and can be deferred until a permit is obtained for construction on each lot. By implementing the flow control BMPs during the development of the project, all or some of the flow control BMPs can be moved outside of the individual lots themselves and placed in designated tracts within the development. Implementation during the development process not only allows for more options in placement of flow control BMPs, but also lets the development take credit for these flow control BMPs when sizing the onsite detention/water quality system. Per the Small Lot Requirements, lots less than 11,000 square feet, each lot must connect to the local drainage system with a perforated pipe connection, and must apply flow control BMPs to mitigate runoff from an impervious area equal to I 0% of the lot area. These BMPs can either be applied individually on each lot or if done during development, the flow control BMPs can be distributed throughout the site. For the subject project, flow control BMPs will be applied during the development of the site. Each lot will connect to the onsite detention/water quality facility through a perforated pipe connection. A portion of the 10% of mitigation for every lot will be done through the use of permeable pavement on Tract C, a joint use driveway serving lot 6 and lot 7. The remaining mitigation will be accomplished with permeable pavement on each lot. The area needed to be mitigated for on the site is broken down below. AREA ON SITE REOUIRING FLOW CONTROL BMPS Total Area of Lots on Site 41,236 SQ ft Percent of Lot Area to be Mitigated 10% Total Area to be Mitie;ated for on Site 4,124 sq ft I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mitigating for the impervious surface on Tract C with the flow control BMP option of permeable pavement accounts for I, 145 square feet of the 4,124 square feet of impervious surface needing mitigation on the site. The remaining 2,979 square feet will be broken up equally between all eight lots. The breakdown can be seen below. INDIVIDUAL LOT FLOW CONTROL BMP MITIGATION Total Area to be Mitigated for on Site 4,124 sq ft Area Mitigated for with Permeable Pavement on Tract C 1,145 sq ft Remaining Impervious Surface Area Needing Mitigation 2,979 sq ft Area of Impervious Surface Mitiiiation Required Per Lot 372 SQ ft The 372 square feet of impervious surfaces requiring mitigation on each lot will be accomplished by the use of a minimum of 372 square feet of permeable pavement on each lot. The permeable pavement will not be constructed during the development of the project, but a declaration of covenant and a grant of easement will be placed on each lot to ensure the flow control BMPs are constructed with lot improvements. The covenant will provide notice to the future lot owner that they are responsible to install a minimum of 3 72 square feet of permeable pavement on the lot prior to final inspection approval of constructed lot improvements. Alternative BMPs that provide equivalent performance may be proposed at the time of permit application for proposed lot improvements. In any case, a revise covenant will needed to be recorded to reflect the final approved BMPs and site improvement plans. The easement over each lot will grant King County or its successor the right to enter the property at reasonable times for purposes of inspecting the flow control BMP and to perform any corrective maintenance, repair, restoration, or mitigation work on the flow control BMP that have not been performed by the property owner within a reasonable time set by Department of Natural Resources and Parks, and to charge the property owner for the cost of any maintenance, repair, restoration, or mitigation work performed by King County. Flow Control BMP Sizing Credit Credit will be given to the sizing of the onsite detention and water quality facility as stated in Table 5.2.2A (p. 5-12). For the subject project the flow control BMPs that will be implemented are "Permeable Pavement (non-grassed)" and "Perforated Pipe Connection". Per Table 5.2.2A "Permeable Pavement (non-grassed)" can be modeled as 50% impervious and 50% pervious and no facility sizing credit is given for the use of "Perforated Pipe Connection" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DEVELOPED BASIN BOUNDARY The developed drainage basin boundary will include the property area, 197,974 square feet, less Tract D which will remain undisturbed, 90,532 square feet, less Tract E which is a future development area, 45,000 square feet, plus proposed improvements and existing pavement along ! 48'h Avenue SE that will be captured within the proposed conveyance system, 3,80 I square feet. The impervious and pervious areas break down within the right of ways and tracts are tabulated on the following page. The impervious and pervious areas for each lot was calculated per section 3.2.2.1 of the 2005 KCSWDM. Per this section, the lots can either be calculated by taking an average of 4,000 square feet of impervious surfaces per site, or by calculating the maximum impervious surfaces allowed per the zoning of the site. Option with the lowest impervious area should be used. Our site is zoned R-4. This allows for maximum impervious coverage of 55%. There are 41,236 square feet of proposed lots on the site. With the maximum impervious coverage of 55% there would be a total of22,680 square feet of impervious surfaces on the lots. Using the 4,000 square feet of impervious surfaces per lot and having eight lots on the site that would be 32,000 square feet of impervious area. Taking the lower value, 22,680 square feet of impervious surface will be accounted for on the site. With the use of flow control BMPs, 50% of the impervious surface on Tract C will be accounted for as pervious and 50% of the 2,979 square feet of pervious pavement required on the lots will be considered pervious. The breakdown of impervious surfaces on the subject project can be seen on the following page. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I DEVELOPED CONDf]['IONS TRIBUTARY TO VAULT Total Area= 66,243 sq. ft. or 1.52 acres AREA DESIGNATION AREA Area Adjusted for Flow (sq. ft.) Control BMP Credit 148'" AVE SE R/W 3,801 3,801 Existing Impervious 1,395 1,395 Proposed Impervious 2,202 2,202 Pervious 203 203 ENTRY ROAD R/W 8,768 8,768 Impervious 8,768 8,768 TRACT A 8,925 8,925 Pervious 8,925 8,925 TRACTB 2,087 2,087 Impervious 1811 1811 Pervious 276 276 TRACTC 1,495 1,495 Impervious I, 145 573 Pervious 350 922 LOTS 41,236 41,236 Impervious 22,680 21,190 Pervious 18,556 20,046 The following information was used for generating time series and flow frequencies. DEVELOPED CONDITIONS TRIBUTARY TO VAULT (06083dev) Total Area= 1.52 acres GROUND COVER AREA(sq ft) AREA(acre) Till-Grass (Landscaoin<>) 30,944 0.70 Impervious 35,367 0.82 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS -DENSITY AND DIMENSIONS 21A.12.010 -21A.12.030 21A.12.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish basic dimensional standards for development relative to residential density and as well as specific rules for general application. The standards and rules are established to provide flexibility in project design, and maintain privacy between adjacent uses. (Ord. 10870 § 338, 1993). 21A.12.020 Interpretation of tables. A. K.C.C. 21 A.12.030 and 21A.12.040 contain general density and dimension standards for the various zones and limitations specific to a particular zone(s). Additional rules, exceptions, and methodologies are set forth in K.C.C. 21A.12.050 through 21A.12.210. B. The density and dimension tables are arranged in a matrix format on two separate tables and are delineated into two general land use categories: 1. Residential; and 2. Resource and Commercial/Industrial. C. Development standards are listed down the left side of both tables, and the zones are listed at the top. The matrix cells contain the minimum dimensional requirements of the zone. The parenthetical numbers in the matrix identify specific requirements applicable either to a specific use or zone. A blank box indicates that there are no specific requirements. If more ·than one standard appears in a cell, each standard will be subject to any applicable parenthetical footnote following the standard. (Ord. 10870 § 339, 1993). 21A.12.030 Densities and dimensions -residential zones. A Densities and dimensions residential zones - RESIDENTIAL ' '""" ""''" "'""' 0 "· RESIDENTIAL ' SERVE ' ' STANDARDS ... RM RA-10 RA-20 "' R-1 (17) , ... .. .. R-12 R-18 ,,. , ... ,., Bau Density: .. , 02 o., 0.05 '' ' ' • • " " " .. Dwalllng du/ac du/ac du/ac '""' "'" '"'" '"'" '"" '"'" '"'" dulac '"" du/oc Unit/Acre 121) ,., "' Maximum Density; .. , • • " " " " " Dwelling Unlt/Acra du/ac 1:~ '"'" '"'" dwK dulac '"'" du/1c " 120! Minimum Dtnalty; ... ... .. . "' '" '" ... '" (12) (12) (12) (18) (18) (16) (18) (18) (18) (18) 123\ Minimum Lot Arn 113) 1.875 3.75 7.5ac 15ac " " Minimum Lot 135 ft 135ft 13511 135ft ,,. "' '" '" "" '" "" "' ~, """' "' "' ,,. Minimum SlrNt "" "" '" "" "' , .. , .. "' "' "' "" ''" "" Setback "' '" ,,, ,., "' '" ,., '" ,., '" ,., "' "' ,,, Minimum Interior " "' "' "' '" " " " " '" " " '" Setbac~ ., ,,, '" '" "' "' (10) (10) (10! (10) 13, 1\61 BaHHelght ~· ~· ~· ~· "" "" "" '" "' ... ... .., ... ,,, (25) '" "' '" ... ... -g:! !~!! (14) {14) (14) Mulmum lmjMNlo1t1 '" "' ,,. 12.5% "" , .. ... '" '" ... ... . .. "' Surlaca: (11) (11) (11) (11) (11) {11) I (25) (25) '"' "" "" (25) (25) Pen:•ntag• (5J (19) (19) (19) (19) (25) (25) 125] (2$) i:t (25) .. -B. Development conditions. 1. This maximum density may be achieved only through the application of residential density incentives in accordance with K.C.C. chapter 21 A.34 or transfers of development rights in accordance with K.C.C. chapter 21A.37, or any combination of density incentive or density transfer. Maximum density may only be exceeded in accordance with K.C.C. 21A.34.040.F.1.g. and F.6. 2. Also see K.C.C. 21A.12.060. 3. These standards may be modified under the provisions for zero-lot-line and townhouse developments. 21A-107 I I Flow Frequency Analysis LogPearson III Coefficients Time Series File:06083dev.tsf Mean= -0.530 StdDev-0.154 I Project Location:Landsburg Skew-0. 7 37 ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak --Peaks Rank Return Prob I (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.316 21 2/16/49 19:00 0. 952 1 89. 50 0. 989 0.556 2 3/03/50 16:00 0.556 2 32.13 0. 969 I 0.330 17 2/09/51 2:00 0. 4 93 3 19.58 0.949 0.241 37 10/15/51 13:00 0. 4 7 4 4 14.08 0.929 0.242 36 3/24/53 15:00 0.468 5 10.99 0.909 0.301 22 12/19/53 19:00 0.465 6 9.01 0.889 I 0.159 50 11/25/54 4:00 0.447 7 7. 64 0.869 0.199 45 12/11/55 13:00 0.429 8 6.63 0.849 0.245 33 2/24/57 14:00 0.426 9 5.86 0.829 0.206 43 12/25/57 17:00 0.426 10 5.24 0.809 I 0.282 24 9/26/59 14:00 0.397 11 4.75 0.789 0.235 39 2/06/60 19:00 0.396 12 4.34 0.769 0.177 47 2/14/61 22:00 0.380 13 3.99 0.749 I 0.206 44 12/17/61 7:00 0.352 14 3.70 0. 729 0.244 34 2/28/63 20:00 0.349 15 3.44 0. 709 0.429 8 9/18/64 5:00 0.345 16 3.22 0.690 0.266 28 11/24/64 4:00 0.330 17 3.03 0. 670 I 0.208 42 12/03/65 17:00 0.328 18 2.85 0.650 0.328 18 9/10/67 13:00 0.319 19 2.70 0.630 0.199 46 8/24/68 17:00 0.317 20 2.56 0.610 I 0.468 5 6/23/69 21:00 0.316 21 2.44 0.590 0.253 30 11/04/69 13:00 0.301 22 2.32 0.570 0.349 15 9/02/71 4:00 0.297 23 2.22 0.550 0.352 14 9/10/72 15:00 0.282 24 2.13 0.530 I 0.168 49 11/25/72 14: 00 0.282 25 2.04 0.510 0.253 31 11/11/73 2:00 0. 274 26 1. 96 0. 490 0.426 10 12/27/74 2:00 0. 267 27 1. 89 0.470 0.243 35 12/29/75 15:00 0.266 28 1. 82 0.450 I 0. 397 11 8/26/77 1:00 0.256 29 1. 75 0.430 0.282 25 12/01/77 23:00 0.253 30 1. 70 0. 410 0.175 48 2/06/79 16:00 0.253 31 1. 64 0.390 I 0.274 26 12/14/79 23:00 0.250 32 1. 59 0.370 o. 396 12 11/21/80 11: 00 0.245 33 1. 54 0.350 0.250 32 10/06/81 2:00 0.244 34 1. 49 0.330 0. 317 20 10/28/82 18:00 0.243 35 1. 45 0.310 I 0.447 7 1/24/84 16:00 0.242 36 1. 41 0.291 0.256 29 11/01/84 23:00 0.241 37 1. 37 0.271 0.345 16 10/22/85 17: 00 0.237 38 1. 33 0.251 I 0.426 9 11/21/86 9:00 0.235 39 1. 30 0.231 0.227 40 5/28/88 16:00 0.227 40 1. 27 0. 211 0.237 38 1/09/89 22:00 0.219 41 1. 24 0.191 0.380 13 1/09/90 7:00 0.208 42 1. 21 0.171 I 0. 465 6 10/18/90 19:00 0.206 43 1.18 0.151 0. 297 23 7 /06/92 16:00 0.206 44 1.15 0.131 0.219 41 3/22/93 19:00 0.199 45 1.12 0.111 0.474 4 9/10/94 14:00 0.199 46 1.10 0.091 I 0.319 19 11/30/94 5:00 0.177 47 1. 08 0.071 0.493 3 2/09/96 0:00 0.175 48 1. 05 0.051 0.952 1 9/17/97 11: 00 0.168 49 1. 03 0.031 I 0.267 27 10/29/97 6:00 0.159 50 1. 01 0 .011 06083dev.pks Page I of2 I I I Computed Peaks 0.808 100.00 0.990 Computed Peaks 0. 69.S 50.00 0.980 I Computed Peaks 0.593 25.00 0. 960 Computed Peaks 0.473 10.00 0.900 Computed Peaks 0.451 8.00 0.875 Computed Peaks 0.390 5.00 0.800 I Computed Peaks 0.283 2.00 0.500 Computed Peaks 0.224 1. 30 0.231 I I I I ,I I I I I I I I I I 06083dev.pks Page 2 of2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Retention/Detention Facility Type of Facility: Facility Length: Facility Width: Facility Area: Effective Storage Depth: Stage O Elevation: Storage Volume: Riser Head: Riser Diameter: Number of orifices: Detention Vault 76.00 ft 34.00 ft 2584. sq. ft 6. 4 0 ft 506.10 ft 16538. cu. ft 6. 4 0 ft 12.00 inches 3 Pipe Orifice # Height (ft) 0.00 3.01 4.52 Diameter (in) 0.75 0.86 1. 00 Full Head Discharge (CFS) 0.039 0.037 0.037 Diameter (in) 1 2 3 4.0 4. 0 Top Notch Weir: None Outflow Rating Curve: None Stage (ft) 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.19 0.31 0.44 0.56 0.69 0.82 0.94 1. 07 1.19 1. 32 1. 4 4 1. 57 1. 69 1. 82 1. 94 2.07 2.20 2.32 2.45 2.57 2.70 2.82 2.95 3.01 vault.doc Elevation (ft) 506.10 506.11 506.12 506 .13 506.14 506.15 506.16 506.29 506.41 506.54 506.66 506.79 506.92 507.04 507.17 507.29 507.42 507.54 507.67 507.79 507.92 508.04 508.17 508.30 508.42 508.55 508.67 508.80 508. 92 509.05 509 .11 (cu. Storage ft) (ac-ft) Discharge (cfs) 0.000 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.007 0.009 0.010 0. 011 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.016 0. 017 0.018 0.018 0.019 0. 0.000 26. 0.001 52. 0.001 78. 0.002 103. 0.002 129. 0.003 155. 0.004 491. 0.011 801. 0. 018 1137. 1447. 1783. 2119. 2429. 2765. 3075. 3411. 3721. 4057. 4367. 4703. 5013. 5349. 5685. 5995. 6331. 6641. 6977. 7287. 7623. 7778. 0.026 0.033 0.041 0.049 0.056 0.063 0.071 0.078 0.085 0.093 0.100 0.108 0 .115 0.123 0.131 0.138 0.145 0.152 0.160 0 .167 0.175 0.179 Page I ofS 0.020 0. 021 0.021 0.022 0.023 0.023 0.024 0.024 0.025 0.026 0.026 0.026 Percolation (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I I 3.02 509.12 7804. 0.179 0.027 0.00 3.03 509.13 7830. 0.180 0.027 0.00 I 3.04 509.14 7855. 0.180 0.028 0.00 3.05 509.15 7 881. 0.181 0.030 0.00 3.06 509.16 7907. 0.182 0.031 0.00 3.07 509.17 7933. 0.182 0.032 0.00 I 3.08 509.18 7959. 0.183 0.032 0.00 3. 21 509.31 8295. 0.190 0.036 0.00 3.33 509. 4 3 8605. 0.198 0.039 0.00 I 3.46 509.56 8 941. 0.205 0.042 0.00 3.58 509.68 9251. 0.212 0.044 0.00 3.71 509.81 9587. 0.220 0.046 0.00 3.83 509.93 98 97. 0.227 0.048 0.00 I 3. 96 510.06 10233. 0.235 0.050 0.00 4.09 510.19 10569. 0.243 0.052 0.00 4. 21 510.31 10879. 0.250 0.053 0.00 I 4.34 510.44 11215. 0.257 0.055 0.00 4.46 510.56 11525. 0.265 0.056 0.00 4.52 510.62 11680. 0. 268 0.057 0.00 4.53 510.63 11706. 0.269 0.057 0.00 I 4.54 510.64 11731. 0.269 0.058 0.00 4.55 510.65 11757. 0.270 0.059 0.00 4.56 510.66 11783. 0.271 0.061 0.00 4.57 510.67 11809. 0.271 0.063 0.00 I 4.58 510.68 11835. 0.272 0. 065 0.00 4.59 510.69 11861. 0 .272 0. 065 0.00 4.60 510.70 11886. 0.273 0.066 0.00 I 4. 61 510. 71 11912. 0.273 0.066 0.00 4.74 510.84 12248. 0.281 0.072 0.00 4.86 510. 96 12558. 0.288 0. 077 0.00 4.99 511. 09 12894. 0. 296 0.081 0.00 I 5.12 511. 22 13230. 0.304 0.085 0.00 5.24 511.34 13540. 0. 311 0.088 0.00 5.37 511.47 13876. 0.319 0.091 0.00 I 5. 49 511. 59 14186. 0.326 0. 094 0.00 5. 62 511. 72 14522. 0.333 0. 097 0.00 5.74 511.84 14832. 0.340 0.100 0.00 5.87 511. 97 15168. 0.348 0.102 0.00 I 5.99 512.09 15478. 0.355 0.105 0.00 6.12 512.22 15814. 0.363 0.107 0.00 6.25 512.35 16150. 0.371 0.110 0.00 6.37 512.47 16460. 0.378 0.112 0.00 I 6.40 512.50 16538. 0.380 0.113 0.00 6.50 512.60 16796. 0.386 0.423 0.00 6.60 512.70 17054. 0.392 0.987 0.00 I 6. 70 512.80 17313. 0.397 1. 720 0.00 6.80 512.90 17571. 0.403 2.510 0.00 6.90 513. 00 17830. 0.409 2.800 0.00 7.00 513 .10 18088. 0. 415 3.050 0.00 I 7.10 513. 20 18346. 0.421 3.290 0.00 7.20 513. 30 18605. 0.427 3.510 0.00 7.30 513. 40 18863. 0.433 3. 720 0.00 7.40 513. 50 19122. 0. 439 3.910 0.00 I 7.50 513.60 19380. 0.445 4.100 0.00 7.60 513.70 19638. 0.451 4.280 0.00 7.70 513. 80 19897. 0.457 4.450 0.00 I 7.80 513. 90 20155. 0. 4 63 4. 610 0.00 I vault.doc Page 2 of5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 7.90 514. 00 20414. 0. 469 4.770 0.00 8.00 514.10 20672. 0.475 4.920 0.00 8.10 514. 20 20930. 0.480 5.070 0.00 8.20 514.30 21189. 0. 486 5.220 0.00 Hyd Inflow Outflow Peak Storage Target Cale Stage Elev (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft) 1 0.33 ******* 0.12 6.40 512.50 16540. 0.380 2 0. 4 9 0 .14 0.10 5.86 511. 96 15136. 0.347 3 0.38 ******* 0.10 5.88 511. 98 15191. 0.349 4 0. 4 5 ******* 0.06 4.57 510.67 11816. 0.271 5 0. 4 0 ******* 0.08 4.89 510.99 12 64 6. 0.290 6 0.28 ******* 0.08 4.85 510.95 12534. 0.288 7 0.20 ******* 0.03 3.05 509.15 7890. 0.181 8 0.11 ******* 0.03 3.07 509.17 7945. 0.182 ---------------------------------- Route Time Series through Facility Inflow Time Series File:06083dev.tsf Outflow Time Series File:rdout Inflow/Outflow Analysis Peak Inflow Discharge: 0.952 CFS at 11: 00 on Sep 17 in 1997 Peak Outflow Discharge: 0.115 CFS at 20:00 on Feb 9 in 1951 Peak Reservoir Stage: 6.40 Ft Peak Reservoir Elev: 512.50 Ft Peak Reservoir Storage: 16540. Cu-Ft 0.380 Ac-Ft Flow Duration from Time Series File:rdout.tsf Cutoff Count Frequency CDF Exceedence_Probability CFS % % % 0.002 217138 49.575 49.575 50.425 0.504E+OO 0.005 42675 9.743 59.318 40.682 0. 4 07E+OO 0.008 44457 10.150 69. 4 68 30.532 0.305E+OO 0. 011 49351 11. 267 80.735 19.265 0.193E+OO 0.015 28148 6.426 87.162 12.838 0.128E+OO 0.018 22191 5.066 92.228 7. 772 0.777E-01 0.021 15579 3.557 95.785 4.215 0.421E-01 0.024 11537 2.634 98.419 1.581 0.158E-01 0.027 3727 0.851 99.270 0.730 0.730E-02 0.031 174 0.040 99.310 0.690 0.690E-02 0.034 446 0.102 99. 412 0.588 0.588E-02 0.037 423 0. 097 99.508 0. 492 0. 4 92E-02 0.040 383 0.087 99. 596 0.404 0.404E-02 0.044 346 0.079 99.675 0.325 0.325E-02 0.047 360 0.082 99.757 0.243 0.243E-02 0.050 2 94 0.067 99.824 0.176 0.176E-02 0.053 272 0.062 99.886 0 .114 0.114E-02 0.056 218 0.050 99.936 0. 064 0.642E-03 0.060 33 0.008 99.943 0.057 0.566E-03 0.063 7 0.002 99.945 0.055 0.550E-03 0.066 19 0.004 99.949 0.051 0.507E-03 0.069 26 0.006 99.955 0.045 0.447E-03 0. 073 21 0.005 99. 960 0.040 0.400E-03 0.076 26 0.006 99.966 0.034 0.340E-03 vault.doc Page 3 of 5 I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.079 29 0.007 99.973 0.027 0.274E-03 0.082 10 0.002 99.975 0.025 0.251E-03 0.085 13 0.003 99.978 0.022 0. 221E-03 0.089 14 0.003 99.981 0.019 0.189E-03 0.092 10 0.002 99.983 0.017 0.167E-03 0.095 10 0.002 99.986 o. 014 0.144E-03 0.098 14 0.003 99.989 0. 011 0 .112E-03 0.102 18 0.004 99.993 0.007 0.708E-04 0.105 12 0.003 99. 996 0.004 0.434E-04 0.108 8 0.002 99.997 0.003 0.251E-04 0.111 8 0.002 99.999 0.001 0.685E-05 0.114 2 0.000 100.000 0.000 0.228E-05 Duration Comparison Anaylsis Base File: 06083ex.tsf New File: rdout.tsf Cutoff Units: Discharge in CFS -----Fraction of Time--------------Check of Tolerance------- Cutoff Base New %Change Probability 0.026 0.99E-02 0.77E-02 -22.8 I 0.99E-02 0.037 0.39E-02 0.48E-02 23.0 I 0.39E-02 0. 04 9 0.17E-02 0.21E-02 22.4 I 0.17E-02 0.060 0.74E-03 0.57E-03 -23.2 I 0.74E-03 0.071 0.38E-03 0.42E-03 12.0 I 0.38E-03 0.082 0.20E-03 0.25E-03 26. 4 I 0.20E-03 0.093 0.91E-04 0.16E-03 72.5 I 0.91E-04 0.104 0.32E-04 0.43E-04 35.7 I 0.32E-04 0 .115 0.18E-04 0.23E-05 -87.5 I 0.18E-04 0.126 0.68E-05 O.OOE+OO -100.0 I 0.68E-05 0.137 0.68E-05 O.OOE+OO -100.0 I 0.68E-05 0 .148 0.46E-05 O.OOE+OO -100.0 I 0.46E-05 0.159 0.46E-05 O.OOE+OO -100.0 I 0.46E-05 0.170 0.23E-05 O.OOE+OO -100.0 I 0.23E-05 Maximum positive excursion= 0.009 cfs ( 9.9%) occurring at 0.089 cfs on the Base Data:06083ex.tsf and at 0.098 cfs on the New Data:rdout.tsf Maximum negative excursion= 0.055 cfs (-32.2%) occurring at 0.170 cfs on the Base Data:06083ex.tsf and at 0.115 cfs on the New Data:rdout.tsf Base New %Change 0.026 0.026 -1. 7 0.037 0.041 9.1 0.049 0.050 3.7 0.060 0.056 -6.7 0.071 0.074 4.6 0.082 0.088 8. 0 0.093 0.101 8.4 0.104 0.107 2.7 0 .115 0.110 -4.6 0.126 0.112 -11. 2 0 .137 0.112 -18.4 0.148 0 .112 -24.4 0.159 0.112 -29.6 0.170 0.115 -32.2 Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:rdout.tsf Project Location:Landsburg LogPearson III Coefficients Mean--1.392 StdDev-0.215 Skew-0. 475 ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.026 0.050 0 .115 0.023 0.039 0.045 0.032 0.032 0. 026 vault.doc 40 18 1 46 23 20 32 33 39 2/17/49 3/05/50 2/09/51 2/01/52 1/12/53 1/06/54 2/08/55 12/11/55 12/13/56 7:00 6:00 20:00 5:00 7:00 8:00 4:00 22:00 0:00 -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- --Peaks --Rank Return Prob (CFS) (ft) Period 0.115 6.40 1 89.50 0.111 6.30 2 32.13 0.102 5.88 3 19.58 0.102 5.86 4 14.08 0.081 5.00 5 10.99 0.078 4.89 6 9.01 0.077 0.076 0.069 Page 4 of 5 4.85 4.84 4. 68 7 8 9 7.64 6.63 5.86 0.989 0. 969 0.949 0.929 0.909 0.889 0.869 0.849 0.829 I I 0.024 44 1/17/58 11: 00 0.069 4. 67 10 5.24 0.809 0.037 27 1/24/59 17:00 0. 064 4.57 11 4.75 0.789 I 0.069 9 11/21/59 4:00 0.057 4.52 12 4.34 0.769 0.051 17 11/20/60 18:00 0.056 4. 4 4 13 3.99 0.749 0. 022 48 12/19/61 17:00 0.056 4.41 14 3.70 0. 729 0.025 41 2/03/63 9:00 0.054 4.28 15 3.44 0.709 I 0.037 28 1/25/64 11: 00 0.053 4.24 16 3.22 0.690 0.057 12 1/30/65 13:00 0.051 4.03 17 3.03 0.670 0.021 49 11/05/65 3:00 0.050 3.95 18 2.85 0.650 I 0.026 36 12/13/66 17:00 0.048 3.86 19 2.70 0.630 0.036 29 6/03/68 9:00 0.045 3.66 20 2.56 0.610 0.040 22 1/07/69 10:00 0.044 3.56 21 2.44 0.590 0.026 34 12/14/69 9:00 0.040 3.39 22 2.32 0.570 I 0.038 26 1/09/71 14: 00 0.039 3.33 23 2.22 0.550 0.056 13 3/01/72 7:00 0.038 3.29 24 2.13 0.530 0.038 25 12/27 /72 21:00 0.038 3.28 25 2.04 0.510 0.032 31 1/16/74 18:00 0.038 3.27 26 1. 96 0. 4 90 I 0.026 35 11/21/74 18:00 0.037 3.27 27 1. 89 0.470 0.054 15 12/04/75 3:00 0.037 3.24 28 1. 82 0. 4 50 0.024 45 8/26/77 6:00 0.036 3.20 29 1. 75 0.430 I 0.077 7 12/03/77 0:00 0.034 3.14 30 1. 70 0. 410 0.024 43 2/12/79 18:00 0.032 3.07 31 1. 64 0.390 0. 07 6 8 12/15/79 16:00 0.032 3.07 32 1. 59 0.370 0.078 6 12/03/80 23:00 0.032 3.07 33 1. 54 0.350 I 0.034 30 1/24/82 1:00 0.026 2.94 34 1. 49 0.330 0.056 14 1/05/83 16:00 0.026 2.88 35 1. 45 0.310 0.064 11 1/25/84 3:00 0.026 2.85 36 1. 41 0.291 I 0.053 16 11/03/84 18:00 0.026 2.82 37 1. 37 0.271 0.044 21 10/28/85 1:00 0.026 2.81 38 1. 33 0.251 0.111 2 11/24/86 8:00 0.026 2.79 39 1. 30 0.231 0.038 24 3/27 /88 14:00 0.026 2.78 40 1.27 0.211 I 0.026 38 11/06/88 2:00 0.025 2.67 41 1. 24 0.191 0.102 3 1/09/90 17:00 0.025 2.67 42 1. 21 0.171 0.069 10 11/24/90 16:00 0.024 2.57 43 1.18 0.151 I 0.026 37 1/30/92 11:00 0.024 2.53 44 1.15 0.131 0.025 42 1/26/93 9:00 0.024 2.43 45 1.12 0.111 0.019 50 12/01/93 19:00 0.023 2.26 46 1.10 0.091 0.048 19 2/19/95 20:00 0.022 2.07 47 1. 08 0.071 'E 0.102 4 2/09/96 4:00 0.022 2.04 48 1. 05 0.051 0.081 5 1/03/97 2:00 0.021 1. 86 49 1. 03 0.031 0.022 47 10/30/97 12:00 0.019 1. 57 50 1. 01 0. 011 Computed Peaks 0.152 6. 41 100.00 0.990 D Computed Peaks 0.126 6. 4 0 50.00 0. 980 Computed Peaks 0.104 5.94 25.00 0. 960 Computed Peaks 0.078 4.89 10.00 0.900 I Computed Peaks 0.073 4.77 8.00 0.875 Computed Peaks 0. 061 4.56 5.00 0.800 Computed Peaks 0.039 3.33 2.00 0.500 Computed Peaks 0.028 3.04 1. 30 0.231 I I I I vault.doc Page 5 of5 I ,, ~ 0 -0 :S :3 ~ I "C "C ~ <ii I-0 Cl "C ~ ~ cu -I I '7 0 I I ~ I ::-o ~ I (I) u C: (I) I "C (I) (I) u "1 X 0 w -~ ~ I :0 cu .0 0 ~ a. i I "f 0 ~ i I "1 I 0 ~ I J 0:: 0 I 0 0 0 0 'I' 0 gr ·o M·o Z(·o 0(0 8 0 9 ·o v ·o z ·o oo· ~ I (Sci::>) a6Je~os10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I C. Water Quality Volume Calculations Basic Water Quality Treatment shall be utilized to mitigate for the developed storm drainage flows. The dead storage portion of the combination water quality/detention vault will satisfy this requirement. The required volume was designed per 2005 KCSWDM Section 6.4.1.1. The following variables were used in the calculation: Volume Factor (J) = 3 Rainfall = 0.041 feet or 0.49 inches Area= developed basin tributary to proposed water quality facility Where A; = area of impervious surface ( sJ) Aig = area of till soil covered with grass (sf) Air= area of till soil covered with forest (sJ) A0 = area of outwash soil covered with grass or forest (sJ) V, = (0.9A; + 0.25Aig + 0.1 Air+ 0.0 I A0 ] * (R/12) Vb= f*Vr Vb= 3*((0.9)(0.82) + (0.25)(0.70)]0.041 * (43560sf/ac) = 4,892 CF The I" cell of the vault accommodates a dead storage volume of 14'*19'*5.48' = 1,458 CF. The 2"d cell of the vault accommodates a dead storage volume of 14'*57'*5.48' = 4,373 CF. The vault therefore, provides a total dead storage volume of 1,458 + 4,373 CF = 5,831 CF which exceeds the required 4,892 CF. I I I I I I I I I I I ff I I 6.4.1 WETPONDS-BASIC AND LARGE-METHODS OF ANALYSIS FIGURE 6.4.1.A PRECIPITATION FOR MEAN ANNUAL STORM IN INCHES (FEET) ST 1.0 ii. ) ST 1.1 0.54" (0.045') IZZl Incorporated Area ....c:::::> River/Lake Major Road 0.47" (0.039') 0.47" (0.039') NOTE: Areas east of the easternmost isopluvial should use 0.65 inches unless rainfall data is available for the location of interest 24 The mean annual storm Is a conceptual storm found by dividing the annual precipitation by the total number of storm events per year LUU5 Surface Water Design Manual 6-71 0.52" (0.043') LA 1.0 LA 1.2 •ING COUNTY 1/24/2005 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN: 148 1h Ave NE Frontage Conveyance To size the conveyance system along 148th Avenue NE an analysis of the upstream tributary basin was completed. Since the outfall of the conveyance system is the downstream road side ditch, no backwater conditions were assumed. Topographical data and aerial photos were used to delineate the upstream tributary basin. The 7.56 acre basin consists of one single family residence with outbuildings and landscaping along 1481h Avenue NE, and pasture and forest behind the residence to the east. Table 3.2.2.D was used to calculate the impervious area outside of the right of way. The impervious area was conservatively calculated at 15% since the actually density of the basin is below one dwelling unit per acre. For the 7.56 acres tributary to the site, this would be 1.13 acres of impervious surfaces. In addition to the 1.13 acres of impervious surfaces in the tributary lots, the 0.07 acres of impervious 148th Ave NE right of way must also be included. The remaining site was delineated from the aerial photographs and is broken out below. For clarification, see the upstream exhibit on the following pages. UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY TO 148TH AVE NE FRONTING SITE (upstream tributarv.tsf) Total Area= 7.56 acres GROUND COVER AREA(acre) Till Forest 3.47 Ti II Pasture 2.48 Till-Grass (Landscaoino) 0.41 Impervious 1.20 KCRTS was used to create a IS-min time series to calculate the upstream flow. The unmitigated 100-year return period storm from the tributary area will be used to asses the minimum required slope. The I 00-year return period flow for the upstream basin (upstream_tributary.tsf) is 2.75 cfs. See attached KCRTS Flow Frequency Analysis on the following pages. Since the conveyance system along 148th Ave NE also collects the runoff from the onsite detention vault, the discharge of the 100 year storm was also assumed to be flowing in the pipe. Combining the 0.15 cfs of flow from the onsite detention facility calculated in I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Section 48 (rdout.tsf) with the 2.75 cfs of upstream flow, 2.90 cfs of flow is assumed through the conveyance system during the JOO-year event. The conveyance system along 148th Ave NE is 12" pipe and the minimum slope is 0.6%. Using Manning's equation, this conveyance system can carry the following flow: 2 I Q 1.49 A R' S2 (full) =--X X X n 2 = 1.49 x I'n x 0.5, x 0.006~ 0.012 4 2 Q(follJ = 3. 00 cfs The 3.00 cfs is more than the generated flow of2.90cfs. Therefore, a 12" pipe at 0.6% will exhibit free flow conditions for the generated 2.90 cfs of flow. The proposed system is therefore, adequately designed to handle the required flows and will not exhibit backwater effects. I I I I I I I I I I E I I I I I I I I SECTION 3.2 RUNOFF COMPUTATION AND ANALYSIS METHODS 1/24/2005 Dwelling Units/Gross % lmpervious111 Dwelling Units/Gross Acre Acre 1.0 DU/GA 1512) 4.5 DU/GA 1.5 OU/GA 20 5.0 OU/GA 2.0 OU/GA 25 5.5 OU/GA 2.5 DU/GA 30 6.0 DU/GA 3.0 DU/GA 34 6.5 DU/GA 3.5 DU/GA 38 7.0 DU/GA 4.0 DU/GA 42 7.5 DU/GA For PUDs, condominiums, apartments, commercial businesses, and industrial areas, percent impervious coverage must be computed. Notes: 11 > Includes streets and sidewalks. % Impervious 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 12> These figures should be adjusted by the effective impervious fraction given in Table 3.2.2.E, if applicable. Values from Table 3.2.2.E may be interpolated as necessary . . 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 3-28 '-----------------------------... I I IMPERVIOUS R/W (0.07 AC) Till PASllJRE (2A8 AC) Till LANDSCAPING (0. ,f.f AC) Till FOREST (3.47 AC) IMPERVIOUS LOT COITT?AGE (1.13 AC) Cm 14711 Nf29Wi"'-, #IOI __ W...,,.._98007 \.--~ 42.S,"5JUT ""'42S.88S.71'63 ~ DESIGN ENGINEEIIING · PLANNING · SUIIVEYING UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PLEASANT PA TH DA TE APRIL 2008 DESIGNED NWO DRAWN NWD PROJECT NUMBER 06083 I I Flow Frequency Analysis LogPearson III Coefficients Time Series File:upstrearn_tributary.tsMean= 0.008 StdDev-0.184 I Project Location:Landsburg Skew-0.027 ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak --Peaks Rank Return Prob I (CFS) (CFS) Period 1. 37 15 2/16/49 17:30 2.19 1 89.50 0.989 1. 52 10 3/03/50 14:45 2.15 2 32 .13 0. 969 I 0.903 29 2/09/51 3:00 2.03 3 19.58 0.949 0. 772 35 11/28/51 18:15 1. 98 4 14.08 0.929 0.669 41 2/03/53 16: 4 5 1. 98 5 10.99 0.909 1. 37 16 9/16/54 16:00 1. 66 6 9.01 0.889 I 0.575 45 5/13/55 0:15 1. 62 7 7.64 0.869 0.523 49 12/22/55 6:15 1. 59 8 6.63 0. 84 9 0.872 31 2/24/57 13:15 1. 58 9 5.86 0.829 I 0.731 37 12/25/57 16:00 1. 52 10 5.24 0.809 1. 28 17 9/26/59 13:30 1. 52 11 4.75 0.789 0.704 38 10/24/59 10:45 1. 51 12 4.34 0.769 0.630 43 4/29/61 14:00 1. 43 13 3.99 0.749 I 0.442 50 10/09/61 17: 45 1. 40 14 3.70 0. 729 1. 23 19 2/28/63 19:00 1. 37 15 3.44 0.709 2.03 3 9/18/64 4:15 1. 37 16 3.22 0.690 0. 767 36 11/24/64 2:45 1. 28 17 3.03 0.670 I 0. 671 40 5/06/66 7:15 1. 25 18 2.85 0.650 0.935 27 9/10/67 11: 30 1.23 19 2.70 0.630 1. 04 25 6/02/68 3:15 1.19 20 2.56 0.610 I 1. 51 12 6/23/69 20:00 1.18 21 2.44 0.590 0.544 47 6/29/70 14:45 1.16 22 2.32 0.570 1. 98 4 9/02/71 2:00 1.10 23 2.22 0.550 1. 43 13 6/25/72 2:15 1. 09 24 2.13 0.530 I 0.540 48 10/25/72 10:15 1. 04 25 2.04 0.510 0.831 33 11/11/73 0:30 o. 960 26 1. 96 0.490 1. 40 14 12/27/74 1:15 0.935 27 1. 89 0.470 I 0. 872 32 7/08/76 23:00 0. 927 28 1. 82 0. 450 1.16 22 8/25/77 23:30 0.903 29 1. 75 0. 430 1.18 21 9/22/78 18:00 0.897 30 1. 70 0.410 0.569 46 11/04/78 20: 45 0. 872 31 1. 64 0.390 I 0. 960 26 12/15/79 6:15 0. 872 32 1.59 0.370 1. 52 11 5/10/81 22:00 0.831 33 1. 54 0.350 0.681 39 10/06/81 1:00 0. 780 34 1. 49 0.330 0.897 30 9/10/83 16:45 0. 772 35 1. 45 0.310 I 1. 98 5 10/30/83 13:00 0.767 36 1. 41 0.291 0. 667 42 11/01/84 20:00 0. 731 37 1. 37 0.271 1. 59 8 10/22/85 16:15 0.704 38 1. 33 0.251 I 1.10 23 11/21/86 8:00 0.681 39 1. 30 0.231 0.780 34 12/03/87 3:00 0. 671 40 1. 27 0. 211 0.628 44 11/22/88 12: 45 0.669 41 1. 24 0.191 1. 66 6 1/09/90 11: 15 0. 667 42 1. 21 0 .171 I 1.25 18 10/18/90 18:30 0.630 43 1. 18 0.151 1.19 20 4 /18 / 92 18:00 0. 628 44 1.15 0.131 1. 58 9 5/21/93 15:00 0.575 45 1.12 0.111 0. 927 28 10/31/93 15:00 0.569 46 1.10 0.091 I 1. 09 24 9/27/95 15:15 0.544 47 1. 08 0.071 2.15 2 5/14/96 6:15 0.540 48 1. 05 0.051 2.19 1 9/18/97 4:30 0.523 49 1. 03 0.031 I 1. 62 7 8/16/98 15:15 0.442 50 1. 01 0. 011 upstream _tributary.pks Page I of2 I I I Computed Peaks 2.75 100.00 0.990 Computed Peaks 2.44 50.00 0.980 I Computed Peaks 2.15 25.00 0. 960 Computed Peaks 1. 75 10.00 0.900 Computed Peaks 1. 67 8.00 0.875 Computed Peaks 1. 45 5.00 0.800 I Computed Peaks 1. 02 2.00 0.500 Computed Peaks 0.738 1. 30 0.231 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I upstream_ tributary .pks Page 2 of2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Onsite Conveyance The conveyance system was designed for the 25-year, 24-hour and 100-year, 24-hour storm events. A conveyance sheet was generated using the rational method to calculate flows for each area collected by each catch basin. See attached Catch Basin Subbasin Map on the following pages. The precipitation rates for the 25-year, 24-hour and I 00- year, 24-hour storm events are 3.45 inches and 3.94 inches consecutively. The flows generated from the conveyance system spreadsheet for both storm events were input into backwater analysis spreadsheets to confirm adequate sizing. The backwater analysis was performed to ensure that during the 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the headwater elevation in each structure did not overtop any of the rims. For the I 00-year, 24-hour storm event structures are allowed to overtop, but all runoff must be safely conveyed to ensure that overflowing runoff or ponding would not cause structural damage. A weighted C value was used for each area collected by each catch basin. The average C value is based on the total area collected by the catch basins. The total catch basin area tributary to the combination detention/water quality vault is equal to the developed conditions tributary to the vault as delineated in Section A of this Report. The average C value is (0.70*0.25 + 0.82*0.90)/1.52 = 0.60. The tailwater elevations within the combination detention/water quality vault were derived from the KCRTS outfall information. See Section B of this Report. The 25-year and JOO-year tailwater elevations are El. 512.04 and El. 512.51 consecutively. Per the attached backwater spreadsheet all flow during the 25-year storm was maintained within the conveyance system. During the I 00-year storm, runoff overtopped CB 4 and CB 5. Due to the topography of the site, the runoff will be safely conveyed down 148 1h A venue NE to the next downstream conveyance structure, CB I. Both storm events meet the requirements of the KCSWDM and therefore the conveyance system is adequately designed. The outfall design for Outfall IA is based on the 100 year storm event, 2.90 cfs. This includes the tributary JOO-year, 15-minute return period storm, 2.75 cfs and the discharge of the detention vault 0.15 cfs. The pipe upstream of Outfall I A can carry a full flow of 2 t Q 1.49 A R1 S' (full) =--X X X n 2 = 1.49 X I'it X 0.53 X 0.0061 0.012 4 2 Q<.,11 > = 3.00 cfs I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I and a full flow velocity of 2 I V 1.49 R' S' (full) =--X X n -' I = J .4 9 X O.S 3 X 0.006 2 0.012 2 v(foll) = 3.82 fps Since the full flow velocity is less than 5 fps and the I 00 year storm event is below full flow, a rip rap outfall was designed based on the discharge velocity falling within the range of O to ~ 5 fps per Table 4.2.2.A. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4.2.3 PUMP SYSTEMS Discharge Velocity at Design Flow (fps) Greater than 0 5 10 20 Less than or equal to 5 10 20 N/A Type Rock lining1 2l Riprap13 > Gabion outfall Engineered energy dissipater required REQUIRED PROTECTION Minimum Dimensions(1) Thickness Width Length 1 foot Diameter 8 feet + 6 feet or 4 x diameter, whichever is greater 2 feet Diameter 12 feet + 6 feet or or 4 x diameter, 3 x diameter, whichever is whichever is greater greater As required As required As required Height Crown + 1/oot Crown + 1 foot Crown + 1/oot 11> These sizes assume that erosion is dominated by outfall energy. In many cases sizing will be governed by conditions in the receiving waters. 12> Rock lining shall be quarry spalls with gradation as follows: Passing 8-inch square sieve: Passing 3-inch square sieve: Passing 3/4 -inch square sieve: 100% 40 to 60% maximum 0 to 10% maximum 13) Riprap shall be reasonably well graded with gradation as follows: Maximum stone size: 24 inches (nominal diameter) Median stone size: Minimum stone size: 16 inches 4 inches Note: Riprap sizing governed by side slopes on outlet channel is assumed to be approximately 3:1. 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 1/24/2005 4-31 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I SECTION 3.2 RUNOFF COMPUTATION AND ANALYSIS METIIODS FIGURE 3.2.1.C 25-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS WIESTERIN KING COILDNTY 25-Year 24-Hour Precipitation in Inches 1/24/2005 0 2 4Miles 3-16 SN ~~S_!'_.,S,2!!_"!2.,! I:\ KING COUNl'Y .. 2005 Surface Water Design Manual I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FIGURE 3.2.1.D JOO-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS WESTERN KING COUNTY 100-Year 24-Hour Precipitation in Inches 2005 Surface Water Design Manual c:, 1,<· 0 2 4 Miles 3-17 3.2.1 RATIONAL METHOD 1/24/2005 11 I I ! I I·· I llh I -•----,.l li ii I , \tc , , u 1 , 1, ' '-I Ii= . 1 11 [[ ·1 t· ! r•;. II fi, -,,~ ~ r:.:1r-r11. ·------J 1] . ~ I 11\1 ~ i I n I u I/ ·..._/ ! I I '- \ .ffi ~'- ; : \ \ .' I '\· ~ ::---8 ;,:! , -r .... I .. I I •• , I 1 / I ·• . \ \ , \ 2 r· 3 . ., \ I • .• -~ \ , 051 I , .. ,.,\ \ \ I' :. , , J 0 45 AC\.. , ~ LJ .. ·,· 7 , / \ I \ " ~· \ \ ~ ~ ~-~-'\ ~ "" (J\ .... -I" \ I \j' '.;\ \ \ . \ \ 8~ \ \ \ \ '3' 'b 4 GB 6 0.24 AC I 5 TRACT C~v JOINT USE DRIVE .. "\_ ' r-ce a o.44AC --------2'~' 6 -,--/-----~ / \ "--- \ ; •,, ' ~ I II, ' \I'\ -·--------l' ~"I l I . (/ J . 1 I I 11 ~11 r . e .. 1 Ii • . 1 ,,,,. I l i / t l SCALE: 1" = 50' 0 12.5 25 50 ©cm ~DESIGN JQI 1 NE 29lfi ,.._, #IOI ....-.w~9B007 42$.885JS77 Fax 425.BB.SJ963 ENGINEERING· PLANNING• SURVEYING CATCH BASIN SUBBASIN MAP PLEASANT PATH DATE APRIL 2008 DESIGNED NWO DRAWN NWO PROJECT NUMBER 06083 !Bl! I!!!!!!!!! ~ !!!!!!!!!!I l!!!!!!!!!I -------------- $Jt()~¢10NV:~¥~¢ESV$WEMUE$JGN )1 LOCATION, KING COUNTY 24-HR RAINFALL: 3.45 INCHES I OB NAME: PLEASANT PATH JOB NUMBER: 06083 NWD DESIGN STORM: 25 YEAR I ······················ t~tt1jt 1~,~ :1rn !t 111,J 1r,~t ~1{ Jtii~ 1 ~1 !~ i11~hf~dfr~1i;;: CB 8 CB 7 0.436 0.60 0.262 0.262 6.30 2.77 0.726 0.012 12 0.500 19 2.92 0.11 2.729 3.47 26.6% CB7 CB6 0.023 0.60 0.014 0.275 6.30 2.77 0.763 0.012 12 0.800 65 3.52 0.31 3.452 4.40 22.1% CB6 CBJ 0.243 0.60 0.146 0.421 6.30 2.77 l.167 0.012 12 5.200 75 7.45 0.17 8.801 11.21 13.3% CBS CB4 0.453 0.60 0.272 0.272 6.30 2.77 0.754 0.012 12 l.000 50 3.71 0.22 3.86-0 4.91 19.5% CB4 CBJ 0.161 0.60 0.097 0.369 6.30 2.77 1.023 0.012 12 0.500 51 :us 0.27 2.729 3.47 37.5% CB3 3A 0.205 0.60 0.123 0.912 6.30 2.77 2.531 0.012 12 136.300 4 28.97 0.00 45.061 57.37 5.6% I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I If; f-<;cr:-2. -c"." ;¥.::-;~:: ___ .,. .. ~~;~:?' ,-i,-~-. iB~CKWfo..'tlKR?CJt,~trIJI-,A~lQ~~t·J: ,i} .... ~. ::~; }~. · ,· ·~ ... ,fi c·':,:",. .. ."c':0 :;}r"'··~r c_--c·l=---=""',.,--l,--,.--=--,1=-~"'---~'-·=rl-.cs;·",:_--ci-,,.-,.,,_--,,;...:;·.j __ -,,-""---·.,+ .. -="-I,-,,,,,--.,_-,,j,.··=-"-"• ---· I I I I i I i I I CI(,:' ·'~ diC; • (CFS) :(FEET): ~i:-n.Ni V ALUE1r, ,,, (Fli'ETJ" ;,~ (FEET) "; (SQIT) :'.c:(fl/SEC) . .' ;c{hisEC) ~ :;;(FEET);,,, ·~f<FEET) ,.: ",(FEET). f.,:(FEET).,.·; , ,, (FEET):~, . (FEET)i. '.,i;(FEET), '· · '(FEEli' ;(FEET) ' '(FEET) ' : ~(FEET) ' , ; (FEET)' '.' Rrii'tL INLET3A CB3 2.53 4 12 0.012 504.10 509.55 0.79 3.22 57.52 0.1613 512.05 0.0170 512,07 0,0807 0,1613 512.31 510.55 0.0343 0,1420 0.5060 512.92 514.50 CB3 CB4 1.02 50 12 0.012 509.55 509.98 0.79 1.30 4.57 0.0264 512.92 0.0348 512.96 0.0132 0.0264 513.00 510.98 0.0143 0.0169 0.0000 513.00 513.02 CB4 CBS 0.75 51 12 0.012 509.98 SI0.25 0.79 0.96 3.59 0.0143 513.00 0.0193 513,02 0.0072 0.0143 513.04 511.25 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 513.04 513.32 CB3 CB6 l.17 75 12 0.012 509.55 513.40 0.79 1.49 1 l.16 0.0343 512.92 0.0679 514,40 0.0172 0.0343 514,45 514.40 0.0147 0.0343 0.0000 514.47 517.72 CB6 CB7 0.76 65 12 0.012 513.40 513.92 0.79 0.97 4.41 0.0147 514,47 0.0251 514.92 0.0073 0.0147 514.94 514.92 0.0133 0.0094 0.0000 514.94 517.64 CB7 CBS 0.73 19 12 0.012 513.92 514,02 0.79 0.92 3.57 0.0133 514.94 0.0067 515.02 0.0066 0.0133 515.04 515,02 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 515.04 517.64 ------------------- ····••n $'tPBM GONY:i'{YiJ~;ijij S1¥$WltM DESJGN• •••••••••• 1 LOCATION, KING COUNTY 24-HR RAINFALL: 3,94 INCHES OBNAME: PLEASANTPATH JOBNUMBER: 06083 NWD DESJGNSTORM.: 100 YEAR ~~~;~~~ :~!~t tt~!~ t! !~f !!. ~~I !t~ ~! :~!~ ii~ I :11~ ~~~~i~Tu#",JfS~t: CBS CB7 0.436 0.60 0.262 0.262 6.30 3.23 0.844 0.012 12 I o.soo 19 3.02 0.10 2.729 3.47 30.9"A CB7 CB6 0.023 0.60 0.014 0.275 6.30 3.23 0.888 0.012 12 I o.soo 65 160 0.30 3.452 4.40 25.7% CB6 CBJ 0.243 0.60 0.146 0.421 6.30 3.23 1.357 0.012 12 I s.200 75 7.79 0.16 8.801 11.21 15.4% CB5 CB4 0.453 0.60 0.272 0.272 6.30 3.23 0.877 0.012 12 I 1.000 50 3.9J 0.21 3.860 4.91 22.7% CB4 CB3 0.161 0.60 0.097 0.369 6.30 3.23 1.189 0.012 12 I o.soo 51 3.32 0.26 2.729 3.47 43.6% CB3 3A 0.205 0.60 0.123 0.912 6JO 3.23 2.942 0.012 12 I D6.300 4 30.98 0.00 45.061 57.37 6.5% I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,..-. ,;z_ '' '·"'' --'Cc<:' "":',,~ --~;t: '~ _ .. .;_:-~ ~~ i·-~ -'.: f,-··: :, ,,_ JB~ij~~Adl:fJER:-fAidCtiJLA:'WIONS ~i _·· •. r,, ~" _:,.~:·:: -_. ~ . -,.; .. ~l!' {,:.-·,,.__. -L.;-~--~.-~-L·:.:-~--~-r~~J:.ti-::t::;;J;/ ... :. ~:·.;, /;_:--:~~-~..7I'l00 1 YEAR~-~~"c:·~· -,_-~£ _--1. ' ' ' -;~!!,E_ ·•. sPIP~.' ~~i~~9·s :,ovr]~J ... ~-~li\~'t' 'P,jP~' :;:i}t\{f, L l!liwf'. ,Cit.2cfft IAIL'YN'il ;F~~i;~! )Jt~~f ~~rHE1,~E; :}!;;'. ::l\tJR~L,' J:it:'"' t1t.cf~fl ::,\D.:: :HEAD lt4;~:i \.¥i' FRO,M:, ) J9 t fLOW. ,LE~f P~ , , .'?'1t , . n, J;;i,,EY tHO,'i ELE~A,_T_l~N '(ARE1' ,\~!;~£!.~ YELPflT\' : ,,J:I.i;Ao•r· pst;V 1Tl()N ~JHSS, :, [l,E\'.ATl!?,N :,'. ~~~;• , LOSS .· ELEYATI?N ELEVATIOf .;H~AD';',: -:. 1'?81'_\ . LOSS ELEVATION . ,;, ;:\', .Te•;·-, , ·CB ,''(CcFS), '1FEET)' ,~(INf ;: ,-vALUE· , .L(FEET)' _, ... c(FEET)·r, (SQ FT) ,i/(FT/SEQ. ,(FT/SEQ:: (FEET) -· -:(FEET)-~~ ''J(FEET):, ,./'(FEET)~•· /c,,(FEET)' (FEET). (FEET) e (FEET) ,, · · (FEET),• ;,(FEET), ,. (FEET), (FEET)' ,. RIM.EL INLET3A CB3 2.94 4 12 0.012 504.10 509.55 0.79 3.75 57.52 0.2182 512.51 0.0230 512.53 o.109q 0.21821 512.86 I 510.IO I 0.04641 0.19201 0.5525 I 513.56 I 514.50 CB3 CB4 1.19 50 12 0.012 509.55 509.98 0.79 LSI 4.57 0.0356 513.56 0.0470 513.61 0.0178 0.0356 513.66 510.98 I 0.01941 0.02281 o.ooool 513.66 I 513.02 CB4 CBS 0.88 51 12 0.012 509.98 510.25 0.79 1.12 3.59 0.0194 513.66 0.0261 513.69 0.0097 0.0194 513.72 511.25 I 0.00001 0.00001 0,00001 513.72 J 513.32 CB3 CB6 1.36 75 12 0.012 509.55 513.40 0.79 1.73 11.16 0.0464 513.56 0.0918 514.40 0.0232 0.0464 514.47 514.40 0.0199 0.0464 0.0000 514.50 517.72 CB6 CB 7 0.89 65 12 0.012 513.40 513.92 0.79 1.13 4.41 0.0199 514.50 0.0341 514.92 0.0099 0.0199 514.95 514.92 0.0180 0.0127 0.0000 514.94 517.64 CB7 CB 8 0.84 19 12 0.012 513.92 514.02 0.79 1.07 3.57 0.0180 514.94 0.0090 515.02 0.0090 0.0180 515.05 515.02 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 515.05 517.64 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Sewall Wetland Consultin , Inc. JOHNSEINE PROPERTY WETLAND ANALYSIS REPORT KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Prepared For: Robert Johnseine 9805 NE 116'h Street #7499 Kirkland, WA 98034 October 10, 2006 Job #A6-209 Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. Phone: 253-859-0515 Fax: 253-852-4732 1103 W. Meeker Street Kent, WA 98032 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Sewall Wetland Consultin , Inc. 1103 W. MeekerSl Kerl, WA 98032-5751 JOHNSJEIN PROPJERTY WJET.LAND ANAL YSJIS RJEPORT KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Location l'tn1e: 253-<l5!>-0515 Fax: 253,%2-4732 This report describes the jurisdictional wetlands located on the Johnseine Property. The 3.93 acre property is located within the urban growth area along the east side of 148th Avenue SE (parcels I 123059010, 1123059092) in unincorporated King County, Washington. ... 1.2 Existing Conditions g -~--· • • The property contains a single family home with several out buildings. The western half of the property is maintained lawn, the eastern half of the property is comprised of a forested area which appears to be at least 3rd growth mixed deciduous. The south and Formerly known as B-12 Wetland Consulting, Inc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Re: Johnseine Property SWC Job# A6-209 October 10, 2006 Page 2 of8 east side of the site is bordered by high density development. The property is bordered by a single family to the north, and is bordered to the west by single 148th Avenue SE. Kin Coun I-ma I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2.0 METHODOLOGY Re: Johnseinc Property SWC Job# A6-209 October IO, 2006 Page3of8 On July 20, July 28, and August 3, 2006, and again on August 7, 2006, Sewall Wetland Consulting Inc. inspected the site for jurisdictional wetlands and streams using methodology described in the Washington State Wetlands Identification Manual (W ADOE, March 1997). This is the methodology currently recognized by the King County, the City of Renton and the State of Washington for wetland determinations and delineations. The Washington State Wetlands Identification Manual as well as the 1987 Federal Manual requires the use of the three-parameter approach in identifying and delineating wetlands. A wetland should support a predominance ofhydrophytic vegetation, have hydric soils and display wetland hydrology. To be considered hydrophytic vegetation, over 50% of the dominant species in an area must have an indicator status of facultative (FAC), facultative wetland (FACW), or obligate wetland (OBL), according to the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9) (Reed, 1988). A hydric soil is "a soil that is saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part." Anaerobic conditions are indicated in the field by soils with low chromas (2 or less), as determined by using the Munsell Soil Color Charts; iron oxide mottles; hydrogen sulfide odor and other indicators. Generally, wetland hydrology is defined· by inundation or saturation to the surface for a consecutive period of 12.5% or greater of the growing season. Areas that contain indicators of wetland hydrology between So/o-12.5% of the growing season may or may not be wetlands depending upon other indicators. Field indicators include visual observation of soil inundation, saturation, oxidized rhizospheres, water marks on trees or other fixed objects, drift lines, etc. Under normal circumstances, indicators of all three parameters will be present in wetland areas. 3.0 OBSERVATIONS 3.1 Existing Site Documentation Prior to visiting the site, a review of several natural resource inventory maps was conducted. Resources reviewed included the King County Soil Survey, King County Sensitive Areas Folio: Wetlands, King County Sensitive Areas Folio: Streams, City of Renton Inventory and the National Wetland Inventory. 3.1.1 King County Soil Survey According to the King County Soil Survey, the site contains Alderwood gravelly, sandy loam (AgC), which typically occurs on slopes of 6-15 percent. Alderwood soils are moderately well drained, and were formed under conifers, in glacial deposits. According to the publication "Hydric Soils of the United States," Alderwood soils are not considered Hydric or wetland soils. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ii I I I I I 3.1.2 King County Sensitive Areas Folio: Wetlands and Streams Re: Johnseine Property SWC /ob# A6-209 October 10, 2006 Page4of8 According to the King County Sensitive Areas Folios, there are no wetlands or streams located on or within 300-feet of the property. There is a wetland identified as 23b, this wetland appears to be located further than 300-feet away and associated with a larger wetland area near Highway 900. 3.1.3 City of Renton Inventory T:· -L According to the City of Renton Streams and Lakes Inventory (figure 4-3-050Q4) and the City of Renton Wetland Inventory (figure 4-3-050Q5), there are no streams, Lakes or Wetlands located on or near the property. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3.1.4 National Wetland Inventory Re: Johnseine Property SWC Job# A6-209 October 10, 2006 Page5of8 According to the National Wetland Inventory, there is a PFOC (palustrine, forested, seasonally flooded) wetland located near the center of the property. National Wetland Invento ., · . • -I • !·. 3.2 Topography The site varies in elevation with high points along the western and eastern property boundary. A low depressional draw near the center of the property extends from the southern property boundary to the northern property boundary. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3.3 Uplands Re: Johnseine Property SWC Job# A6-209 October 10, 2006 Page6of8 The upland portion of the site is typical of disturbed urban areas sites. The western portion of the property appears to have been historically cleared and graded in association with the existing single family residence. The eastern portion of the property has a deciduous forested canopy predominantly comprised ofred alder (A/nus rubra) with a shrub underbrush dominanted by Himalayan blackberry (Rubus anneniacus). Other · species located within the upland areas include beaked hazelnut (Cory/us cornuta), red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa), holly (!lex sp.), and snowberry (Symphoricarpos a/bus), Soil pits excavated within the upland areas of the site generally revealed a 16-inch layer of gravelly, silt loam. Two recorded data points within upland areas revealed colors of lOYR 3/6 and IOYR 4/3. These areas were dry within 16-inches of the soil surface during the time of our field investigation. 3.4 Wetland A/B Wetland A/B was flagged with pink "Wetland Delineation" flagging labeled A-1 through A-12 (western wetland edge) and B-1 through B-14 (eastern wetland edge;) Wetland A/B is located near the center of the property and extend off-site to the north of the property and to the south of the property. Wetland A/B is a scrub-shrub and emergent wetland located near the center of the property. Although there are some tree species located within the wetland there are not enough trees greater than 20-feet tall to comprise a forested wetland class. Dominant vegetation within Wetland A/B includes black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera), red alder (A/nus rubra), salmonberry (Rubus spectabi/is), hard hack (Spiraea doug/asi1), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea), manna grass (Glyceria e/ata), skunk cabbage (Lysichitum americanum), soft rush (Juncus effusus), and buttercup (Ranunculus repens). Soil pits excavated within the wetland revealed a silt loam A-horizon with a color of I OYR 2/1; an underlying sandy, silt loam 8-horizon revealed a color of SY 5/2. Soils within the wetland were typically saturated within 12-inches of the soil surface during the time of our site visit. According to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) wetland classification method (Cowardin et al. 1979), WetlandA/B would be considered a PSSlC (palustrine, scrub-shrub, broad-leaved deciduous, seasonally flooded), and PEMl C (palustrine, emergent, persistent, seasonally flooded) wetland. · According to the King County Code (KCC §21A.24.380), Wetland A/B would be considered a Category 3 wetland based on an overall score of 46 (Water Quality 22, Hydrologic 7, Habitat 17) on the adopted Department of Ecology Wetland Rating Form for Western Washington. Typically, Category 3 wetlands with habitat scores less than 20 points and located within the urban growth area have 75-foot buffer measured from the wetland edge. A 15-foot building setback line (BSBL) is measured from the buffer edge. I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I Re: Johnseine Property SWC Job# A6-209 October IO, 2006 Page 7 of8 Wetlands located within the urban growth area may receive a 25-foot buffer reduction if all criteria pursuant to §21A.24.325 are followed. According to the City of Renton Municipal Code (RMC §4-3-050(B)(7)), Wetland A/B would be considered a Category 2 wetland due to is size being greater than 2,200sf and not being classified as a Category 1 or Category 3 wetland. Typically, Category 2 wetlands have a 50-foot buffer measured from the wetland edge (RMC§4-3-050(M)(6). 3.6 Wildlife and Habitat per Renton Study Requirements Research for wildlife species included field investigations and research of the Washington Fish and Wildlife habitat inventories. The site can be broken into two distinct vegetative communities based on the site visit and review of the aerial photographs provided by King County I-map and the City of Renton 2003 aerial photo. (Note: these sketches are not to scale and do not represent surveys of the mapped vegetative communities.) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Re: Johnseine Property SWC Job# A6-209 Ootober I 0, 2006 Page 8 of8 No threatened or endangered species were observed during the time of our site visits. Likewise, no identifiable visual signs of any endangered or threatened species were observed on the property. · A search of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Habitat and Species Map for King County and Vicinity did not reveal any Endangered, Threatened or Sensitive species located on or near the site. The inventory does reveal a State Candidate Species site located approximately 2 miles to the northeast of the site. 4.0 Proposed Project The proposed project is a single family subdivision. Under the King County Code the . project has been designed to avoid impacts to the wetland and its associated buffer by utilizing the mitigation measures set forth by §21A.24.325. Therefore, with the 25-foot buffer reduction the project will avoid impacts to the critical area. Upon acceptance of the conceptual mitigation plans, a final mitigation plan will detail the plant species, size, location, monitoring requirements of any degraded area within the reduced wetland buffer. Under the Renton Municipal Code the proposed project will avoid impacts to the wetland and its associated buffer. If you have any questions or need any additional information please contact our office at 253.859.0515 or by e-mail at awill@sewallwc.com. Sincerely, Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. J. Aaron Will Wetland Scientist File:AS-209 Johnseine Property wa.doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .o,-., E8090 ·mtii"Or ,o, •• , £So9o ·oN<BOr -"'""-' tsoeo ·oN'BOr ,' ,Ot•.L £8090 ·oN'SQ; I I 1· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .o••.! eaoeo ·oNBO; .o,-., £8090 ·or.tao; . ' I I I I I ! I l II '! ,1 .O>•,L £so90 ·oN'~"Of .O••., ESoso ·oN'SO; I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (Washington State Wetlands Identification & Delineation Manual, 1997) B-12 WETLAND CONSULTING, INC. 1103 West Meeker Street Kent, Washington 98032 (253) 859-0515 Proiect Name/#: Sinoh -Stillwater Prone~· Date: 8-3-06 Investioator: Aaron Will Data Point: ) Jurisdiction: Kino Countv State: WA A ~-ical Analvsis: Ihle/ Problem Area: t,,.rel VEGETATION Dominant plant species Stratum Indicator Coverage% 1. /v l;tv S .,..(?-"I ( 11 ·'-c. V";., 51s 'F1:Cc0- 2. AJA v) r"Vl.,.,I",:..... -. 3. Sc,, b v-:, Scae.J\~ ..... b .,-F 1:C,:IA 4. -,-,_wt!' r,• 11, .,- 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. % of species OBL, FACW and/or FAC: > 39. Hydrophytic vegetation criteria met: Yes @> Marginal Comments: SOILS Mapped Soil Series: Alderwood On Hydric Soils List?: Yes ~ Drainage Class: moderatelx well drained Depth(O in) Matrix color Redox concentration color Texture .JE..in. /0 t.il. '5/~ 8,::e,vt.\\j ,s,t J+ la:.r,,1~ in. - in. - in. Organic soil_, His tic epipedon ___, Hydrogen sulfide_, gleyed _, redox concentrations___, redox depletions___, pore linings_, iron concretions_, manganese concretions_, organic matter in surface horizon (sandy soil)_, organic streaking (sandy soils)_, organic pan {sandy soil)_. ,41,'§ 1-,. C k "'!!! ""' "'-Hydric soil criteria met: Yes l@" Basis: Comments: HYDROLOGY Recorded data , inundation -, saturation , watermarks ___ , drift lines ___ , sediment deposits ___ , drainage patterns . Wetland hydrology criteria met: Yes cflil Basis: Dr~ Comments: (.I SUMMARY OF CRITERIA Soil Temp. at 19.7" depth: Growing Season?:.ifr! -· Hydrophytic vegetation:.Y® Hydric soils:..Yll9?',Vetland hydrology: Yflj) Data point meets the criteria of a jurisdictional wetland?: Yes M';;l I I I 'I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (Washington State Wetlands Identification & Delineation Manual, 1997) B-12 WETLAND CONSULTING, INC. 1103 West Meeker Street Kent, Washington 98032 (253) 859-0515 Project Name/#: Singh -Stillwater ProQe!:!Y Date: 8-3-06 Investigator: Aaron Will Data Point: ;;i,. Jurisdiction: King County State: WA Atypical Analysis: ltlfJ Problem Area: ltlfJ VEGETATION Dominant plant species Stratum Indicator Coverage% 1.~{}.~,,,!il,.._, [.i'b~·.(et:tl).,.,.-I+ E..J:.c f-v c1 ll. t.::~1·1...b,1 li' S ~t.S :FA-c.t-2. &,b,)< 3. a::, i ........ ~ • C& 1t.J.£. IV""1 'f:.d:.tY• ~ 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. % of species OBL, FACW and/or FAC: ... '7 % Hydrophytic vegetation criteria met: ~No Marginal Comments: SOILS Mapped Soil Series: Alderwood On Hydric Soils List?: Yes ltlfJ Drainage Class: moderately well drained Depth(O in) Matrix color Redox concentration color Texiure t•/in. /O'r(l 'v,./1 <;,'If J-L """ }J_in. ~!:'. ,; /~ t,..-"",;.,,-a.-.,~)~,r ~." .id 5.1ft /~t':!j m. - m. Organic soil_, Histic epipedon_, Hydrogen sulfide_, gleyed_, redox concentrations.!{_, redox depletions_, pore linings_, iron concretions_, manganese concretions_, organic matter in surface horizon (sandy soil)_. organic streaking (sandy soils)_, organic pan (sandy soil)_. Hydric soil criteria met@No Basis: Comments: HYDROLOGY Recorded data -, inundation , saturation k , watermarks__, drift lines_, sediment deposits ___ , drainage patterns . /VI O ,"'., J-$ "'+.,.,. •• _\,· eJ Wetland hydrology criteria met@No Basis: -'> Comments: SUMMARY OF CRITERIA Soil Temp. at 19.7" depi Growing Season?:&IN Hydrophytic vegetation: IN Hydric soils:.t1LN Wetland hydrologytlfil Data point meets the criteria of a jurisdictional wetland?: G No :I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (Washington State Wetlands Identification & Delineation Manual, 1997) B-12 WETLAND CONSULTING, INC. 1103 West Meeker Street Kent, Washington 98032 (253) 859-0515 Project Name/#: Singh -Stillwater ProQerty Date: 8-3-06 Investigator: Aaron Will Data Point: .S: Jurisdiction: King County State: WA Atyr,ical Analysis: ~ Problem Area: ~ VEGETATION Dominant plant species Stratum Indicator Coverage% I. l,,i, ~ 6.Ct!'.l.t:l!'.l 1'&' J.l~ Sl~ FAl'..!1 2. LI J s ('" l,, ( "'--r F.'' 3. -r,~., ,. ~1< NZ 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. % of species OBL, FACW and/or FAC: ~t) 9.:! Hydrophytic vegetation criteria met: Yes~inj;B Comments: SOILS Mapped Soil Series: Alderwood On Hydric Soils List?: Yes ~ Drainage Class: moderately well drained Depth(O in) Matrix color Redox concentration color Texture L£in. !Of I(_ '113 ~,.~,''.;) s: i+ ( o .... vV\. in. -in. - in. Organic soil_, His tic epipedon _, Hydrogen sulfide_, gleyed _, redox concentrations_. redox depletions_, pore linings_, iron concretions_, manganese concretions_, organic matter in surface horizon (sandy soil) _J organic streaking (sandy soils)___, organic pan (sandy soil)_. Hydric soil criteria met: Yes® Basis: ti. ~a"' C. \,., .r O"""' !!,. Comments: HYDROLOGY Recorded data_, inundation , saturation , watermarks_, drift lines ___ , sediment deposits ___ , drainage patterns [")" ~ Wetland hydrology criteria met: Yes @ Basis: Comments: C1 SUMMARY OF CRITERIA Soil Temp at 19.7" depth: Growing Season?:~ Hydrophytic vegetat10n:m Hydric soils:...'!'.LH'N etland hydrology: Y1fP Data point meets the criteria of a jurisdictional wetland?: Yes tt1Y I I WETLAND RATING FORM -WESTERN WASHING TON Name of wetland (if known): Wetland A/B -Johnseine Property Location: SEC: __ _ TWNSHP: RNGE: __ _ (attach map with outline of wetland to rating form) ,, Person(s) Rating Wetland: Aaron Will Affiliation: Sewall Wetland Consulting. Inc. Date of site visit: 8-3-06 I I I I t I I I I I I I I SUMMARY OF RATING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland I II III IV Category I= Score> 70 Score for Water Quality Functions 22 Category II = Score 51 -69 Score for Hydro logic Functions 7 Category Ill = Score 30 -50 Score for Habitat Functions 17 Category JV = Score< 30 TOT AL Score for Functions 46 Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTCS of Wetland I II Does not apply -- Final Category (choose the "highest" category from above") 3 Check the appropriate type and class of wetland bemg rated. .1}@"',''·/iil,\Wiil ·-a~1;~:·1~~tw~ .. ,, .. ~1,,tiJ .. ?. ,~ .•. 11n . .. . e.,.. ~-, 1, 'ifl!£fW I fftitr1m~tw_etrtn'<faCn1ss1ri:~tt'i}i~: i.-;~~~f Estuarine Denressional X Natural Heritaee Wetland Riverine Boe Lake-frinee Mature Forest Slone Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal Laaoon Freshwater Tidal Interdunal None of the above Does the wetland being rated meet any of the criteria below"/ If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the ulations re ardin the s ecial characteristics found in the wetland. :\t>'N!r,·11\.'. ''., ;}~·(-: r.··;4.,Jf\iffe.1"11la"n·b""s'"t' 'b' .Jlt'YN' ,l.:~:rii1vs·1*i':1l"!lec'l'l,at,_\'r:1il.P"r. \·· {/,;1~tt£i}\, ~.,(·~ 1U _~_."'1~'M~,r®_ ._1!tn.~!.!i'l.1;!.:,,•:t:ic;~~i~~-~,P,w-~. r·ffl_ /~~:_' ,,.,ha•,.,.,,,. n, , . a ;arem.ot/lnclnd il,ln{the,Rat.m SP 1. Has the wetland been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered plant or animal species (TIE species)? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state or federal database. SP2. Has the wetland been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or Endangered plant or animal species? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the a ro riate state database. SP4. Does the wetland have a local significance in addition to its functions? For example. the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program. the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local mana ement lan as havin s ecial si nificance. To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the Hydrogeomorphic Class of the wetland being rated. The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands in to those that function in similar ways, This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. See p. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Wetlancl Ratinl! Fann-western Washin!lton ( 11/04) Page I of8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Wetland Name: Classification of Vegetated Wetlands for Western Washington Date: I. Are the water levels in the wetland usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during fioods)? IHQJ-go to 2 YES -the wetland class is Tidal Fringe If yes, is the salinity of the_ water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? YES -Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO -Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) ff your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. !fit is a Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuari11e wetland. Wetlands that were call estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the term "Estuarine" wetland is kept. Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Category I and II estuarine wetlands have changed (seep. __ ). 2. Is the topography within the wetland flat and precipitation is only source (>90%) of water to it. IHQJ-go to 3 YES -The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a "Flats" wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the wetland meet both of the following criteria? 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. ___ The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of open water (without any vegetation on the surface) where at least 20 acres (8ha) are permanently inundated (ponded or flooded); -~ ___ At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 (2 m)? @ go to 4 YES -The wetland class is Lake-fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria? ___ The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual). ___ The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks. · ___ The water leaves the wetland without being impounded? NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these types of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than I foot deep). IHQJ-go to 5 YES -The wetland class is Slope Is the wetland in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river? The flooding should occur at least once every two years, on the average, to answer "yes". The wetland can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding. IHQJ-go to 6 YES -The wetland class is Riverine Is the wetland in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at some time of the year. This means that any outlet, if present is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO -go to 7 ~ -The wetland class is Depressional Is the wetland located in a very flat area with no obvious depressional and no stream or river running through it and providing water. The wetland seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. No -go to 8 YES -The wetland class is Depressional Your wetland seems to be difficult to classify. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. Sometimes we find characteristics of several different hydrogeomorphic classes within one wetland boundary. Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second colunm represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland being rated. If the area of the second class is less than 10% classify the wetland using the first class. ,,~.'itGM'<;:t ·•· '"JKih " >1,Cl{ t'i1t'W.i/'"flJiJ"W'''/l ;;:;:~t -'r::, . ·: · .. cps_e$s: .1,_l, zn.,a, ... e n.~g e ; .e {l,n · Q .Q tJ, ,p~i,1 .i:i$;¥F" ,,";.:J;~fl#,~J.WQ/(l's_sfiO\tJ~i.rt.nNt.'ii'ltii'ii!l~i;\'ttt{~4~tt{l!1M?~})·i\i Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Denressional Slope+ Lake-fringe Lake-frinPe Depressional + Riverine alonl! stream within boundarv Deoressional Depressional + Lake-fringe Denressional Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of Treat as ESTUARINE under wetlands with special freshwater wetland characteristics If you are unable sllll to determme which of the above cntena apply to your wetland, or you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. WP.tlnnrl RntinP Fonn-WP.StP.m WashinPton (11/04) Paee 2 of 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I D I Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (see p.38) D l .1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: • Wetland is a depression with no surface water outlet ............................................................ points= 3 • Wetland has an intermittently flowing, or highly constricted, outlet.. ................................... points= gj • Wetland has an unconstricted surface outlet ......................................................................... points= I Wetland is flat and has no obvious outlet and/or outlet is a ditch .......................................... oints = l D l .2 The soil 2 inches below the surface is clay, organic, or smells anoxic (hydrogen sulfide or rotten eggs). YES oints = NO oints = 0 D 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation (emergent, shrub, and/or forest class): • Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation>= 95% of area ............................................... points= 5 • Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation>= Yz of area .................................................. points= I] • Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation>= 1/10 ofarea ............................................... points = 1 • Wetland has ersistent un razed ve etation < 1/IO of area .................................................. oints = 0 D 1.4 Characteristics o seasona pon ing or inundation: T, is is the area o the wet/an that is ponded for at least 2 months, but dries out sometime during the year. Do not count the area that is permanently ponded. Estimate area as the average condition 5 out of IO years. NOTE: See text Jor indicators of seasonal and permanent inundation. Area seasonally ponded is> 1/2 total area ofwetland ........................................................... points = 4 Area seasonally ponded is> 1/4 total area of wetland .......................................................... points -~ • Area seasonall onded is< 1/4 total area of wetland ........................................................... oints = 0 Total for D 1 Add the oints in the boxes above D 2 Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (seep. 44) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water corning into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland? Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft Untreated storrnwater discharges to wetland Tilled fields or orchards within 150 ft. of wetland A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas, residential areas, farmed fields, roads, or clear-cut logging _x_ Residential, urban areas, golf courses are within 150 ft. of wetland Wetland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen Other YES multiplier is 2 2 4 3 2 11 Multiplier 2 .:::}::It'?~;a:Jw~oR:oUoGI0~F-CJNfrm0Ns·.:iiiiitdiC-atOfs\iKit-\.W.et1an'&fi ntrriori'S\to\te'di1CcfflCtd'chfi'"·randYStream·1ae·· ·aaat1ort~)i!t?:::i:,t.::tM(~~? D 3 Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? (see p.46) ttf,,,>:~,\~·iii D 3. I Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: • Wetland has no surface water outlet ..................................................................................... points= 4 • Wetland has an intermittently flowing, or highly constricted, out]et.. ................................... points = ~ Wetland is flat and has no obvious outlet and/or outlet is a small ditch ................................. points= l Wetland has an unconstricted surface outlet ......................................................................... oints = 0 D 3 .2 Depth of storage during wet periods. Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. • Marks of ponding are 3 ft. or more above the surface ........................................................... points = 7 • The wetland is a "headwater wetland" .................................................................................. points== 5 • Marks of ponding between 2 ft. to< 3 ft. from surface ......................................................... points= 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft. to < 2 ft. from surface ................................................................... points= QJ • Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water ................................ points == 1 • Marks of ondin less than 0.5 ft .......................................................................................... oints = 0 D 3.3 Contri ut1on of wetland to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio o upstream basin contn utmg surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland itself. • The area of the basin is less than IO times the are of wetland ................................................ points = 5 • The area of the basin is IO to 100 times the area of the wetland ........................................... points= \J:] • The area of the basin is more than I 00 times the area of the wetland .................................... points = 0 • Wetland is in the FLATS class basin -the wetland b definition ...................................... oints = 5 Total for D 3 Add the oints in the boxes above D 4 Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? (seep. 49) Answer YES if the wetland is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage, or reduction in water velocity, it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Answer NO if the water coming into the wetland is controlled by a structure such as flood gate, tide gate, flap valve, reservoir etc. OR you estimate that more than 90% of the water in the wetland is from groundwater. Note which of the following indicators of opportunity apply. Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems. Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might otherwise flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems Other---------------------------------- YES multiplier is 2 ¢ TOTAL -H drolo ic Functions Multi D4; then add score to table on . 1 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington (11/04) 2 2 3 7 Multiplier I 7 Page J of 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I H 1 Does the wetland have the potential to provide habitat for many species? H I. I Vegetation structure (see P. 73): Check the types of vegetation classes present (as defined by Cowardin) if the class covers more than I 0% of the area of the wetland or 1 /4 acre. Aquatic Bed _x_ Emergent plants _x_ Scrub/shrub (areas where shrubs have> 30% cover) _x_ Forested (areas where trees have> 30% cover) __ Forested areas have 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) Add the number of vegetation types that qualify. If you have: 4 types or more ... points = 4 3 types .. points=~ 2 t es ................ oints = 1 1 t e .... oints = 0 H 1.2 Hydroperiods (seep. 74): Hl.3 H 1.4 Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than /0% of the wetland or 114 acre to count (see text/or descriptions ofhydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated _x_ Seasonally flooded or"inundated 4 or more types present ..... points= 3 _x_ Occasionally flooded or inundated 3 types present .................. points= if] x __ Saturated only 2 types present .................. points= l Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake-fringe wetland ................. = 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland .......... = 2 points Richness of Plant Species (seep. 76): Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least IO ft 2 (different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold) You do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Mi/foil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian Thistle. If you counted: > 19 species ....................... points= 2 5 -19 species .................... points= I!] List species below (optional): < 5 species ......................... points = 0 Interspersion of Habitats (seep. 77}: Decided from the diagrams below whether interspersion between types of vegetation (described in H 1.1), or vegetation types and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, medium, low, or none. None·= 0 points Low= 1 point Moderate = 2 points / [riparian braided channels] High = 3 points Note: If you have 4 or more vegetation types or 3 vegetation types and open water, the rating is always "hi h". H 1.5 Special Habitat Features (seep. 78): Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points you put into the next column. x __ Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland(> 4 in. diameter and 6 ft. long) _x_ Standing snags (diameter at the bottom> 4 inches) in the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft. (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3 .3 ft. (Im) over a stream for at least 33 ft. ( I Om) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present At least 1/4 acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg-laymg by amphibians) _x_ Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in each stratum of plants 2 2 2 3 10 Pag:e 4 of 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I H 2 Does the wetland have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species? 1 ' :.-:5:f.::{<i,!;1:":/:' H 2.1 Buffers (see P. 81): Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See text for definition of "undisturbed". __ I OOm (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 95% of circumference. No developed areas within undisturbed part of buffer (relatively undisturbed also means no grazing) ......................................................... points= 5 __ 1 OOm (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 50% circumference .................................................................................................... points= 4 __ 50m (170 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 95% circumference .................................................................................................... points = 4 __ 100m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 25o/o circumference .................................................................................................... points = 3 3 _x_ 50m (170 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for> 50% circumference ............................................................................................... points ~ If buffer does not meet any of the three criteria above: __ No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25m (80 ft) of wetland> 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing or lawns are OK ................................... points = 2 __ No paved areas of buildings within 50m of wetland for> 50% circumference. Light to moderate grazing or lawns are OK ................................................................... points= 2 __ Heavy grazing in buffer ................................................................................................. points= 1 __ Vegetated buffers are< 2m wide (6.6 ft) for more than 95% circumference (e.g. tilled fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland) ............................. points= 0 Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above ............................................................... points= 1 H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (seep. 82) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft. wide, has at least a 30% cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (Dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads, paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor). YES= 4 points (go to H 2.3) NO= go to H 2.2.2 H. 2.2.2 ls the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian 0 or upland) that is at least 50 ft. wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size'/ OR a lake- fringe wetland, if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? YES= 2 points (go to H 2.3) NO= go to H 2.2.3 H. 2.2.3 ls the wetland: , Within 5 mi (8km) of a brackish or salt water estuary OR , Within 3 miles of a large field or pasture(> 40 acres) OR • Within l mile of a lake greater than 20 acres? YES = © iioint I NO= omts I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW (seep. 83): Which of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft. ( I OOm) of the wetland? (See text for a more detailed description of these priority habitats.) __ Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. __ Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.8 ha (2 acres) __ Cliffs: Greater than 7.6m (25 ft) high and occurring below 5000 ft. _x_ Old-growth forests: (Old growth west of Cascade Crest) Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings, with at least 20 trees/ha (8 trees/acre) > 8 l cm (32 in) dbh or> 200 years of age. Mature forests: Stands with average diameters exceeding 53cm (21 in) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth; 80 -200 years old west of the Cascade Crest. Prairies: Relatively undisturbed areas (as indicated by dominance of native plants) where greases and/or forbs form the natural climax plant community. Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 -2.0m (0.5 -6.5 ft), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages. Oregon white Oak: Woodlands stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component of the stand is 25%. Urban Natural Open Space: A priority species resides within or is adjacent to the open space and uses it for breeding and/or regular feeding; and/or the open space functions as a corridor connecting other priority habitats, especially those that would otherwise be isolated; and/or the open space is an isolated remnant of natural habitat larger than 4 ha (10 acres) and is surrounded by urban development. Estuary/Estuary.Jike: Deepwater tidal habitats and adjacent tidal wetlands, usually semi-enclosed by land but with open, partly obstructed or sporadic access to the open ocean, and in which ocean water is at least occasionally diluted by freshwater runoff from the land. The salinity may be periodically increased above that of the open ocean by evaporation. Along some low-energy coastlines there is appreciable dilution of sea water. Estuarine habitat extends upstream and landward to where ocean-derived salts measure less than 0.5 ppt. during the period of average annual low flow. Includes both estuaries and lagoons. Marine/Estuarine Shorelines: Shorelines include the intertidal and subtidal zones of beaches, and may also include the backshore and adjacent components of the terrestrial landscape (e.g., cliffs, snags, mature trees, dunes, meadows) that are important to shoreline associated fish and wildlife and that contribute to shoreline function (e.g., sand/rock/log recruitment, nutrient contribution, erosion control). If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats . = 4 points If wetland has I priority habit ... =~ If wetland has 2 orioritv habitats .............. -3 ooints No habitats ............................... -0 ""'ints H 2.4 Wetland Landscape: Choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland that best Ji.ts (seep. 85) • Theie are at least 3 other wetlands within 1/2 mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields, or other development ....................................................................................................................... points = 5 • The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within 1/2 mile ..................................................................................................... points= 5 • There are at least 3 other wetlands within l/2 mile, BUT the connections between them are disturbed ............................................................................................................................. points = ~ • The wetland fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within 1/2 mile .................................................................................................................... points = 3 • There is at least I wetland within 1/2 mile ........................................................................... points = 2 • There are no wetlands within 1/2 mile ................................................................................. ooints = 0 H 2 TOTAL Score -opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores in the columns above Total Score for Habitat Functions Add the points for H I and H 2; then record the result on p. 1 ,11n+ln-,.:i Dn+;~,.. p,.,,.,...,., ,,,art.,~ \lf,,,.h;,.,,...+,._,.., (11 /(),1'1 3 7 17 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described below and circle the appropriate answers and Category. f?,:)tt-ii-W Ctld"ri"ct ::1t ~e ~'tihitRta-'~?ab~·~j~'Pi,lf.i~::.tii~{Q; ,:,:..1. '.,t~ ~/ji'~tW~ilit ''ti.:,; ·.(t)f~i~:Iht'C~ie '.-'(t'·'JVhJlt;'Jlti/'fi'' ,.*~c/ · r;a·1e t~;/:;: .... · :;,~1:;h ~: -j ~}:::./:f',i:~;;;~l·1'id1;J~;J~r-::?iJJt.~~~;f;.~~1~~i~::)(,t'ft'::.:s:··IJ~ttt ,::\/~·Yf:t4e·u~}J:);tf~f ~/::fW2\}tf4t~.1i/t?hf P·i':-;j~,i~~~t.'.:~'l \)llt??::i}t';~~ . : SCI '""'"~'E;?f ~;~:;:.i;~:~~~:~· fo, &•·~:· ""'""' :ltl\ SC2 SC3 SC 1.1 ls the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332- 30-151? YES = Category I NO = go to SC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the following conditions? YES = Category I NO = Category II __ The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing, and.has less than 10% cover of non-native plant species. If the non-native Spartina spp,. are only species that cover more than I 0% of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual rating (I/II). The area of Spartina would be rated a Category II while the relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a Category 1. Do not, however, exclude the area of Spartina in determining the size threshold of I acre. __ At least 3/4 of the landward edge of the wetland has a I 00 ft. buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland __ The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. Natural Heritage Wetlands (seep. 88) Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural heritage Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland being rated in a Section/Township/Range that contains a natural heritage wetland? (This question is used to screen out most sites before you need to contact WNHPIDNR.) S/T/R information from Appendix D or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site __ _ YES __ Contact WNHP/DNR (seep. 88) and go to SC 2.2 NO __ _ SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? YES = Category 1 NO Bogs (seep. 88) Does the wetland (or part of the wetland) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify if the wetland is a bog. If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its junction. 1. Does the wetland have organic soil horizons (i.e. layers of organic soil), either peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils)? YES= go to question 3 NO= go to question 2 2. Does the wetland have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or vo1canic ash, or that are floating on a lake or pond? YES= go to question 3 NO= is not a bog for purpose of rating 3. Does the wetland have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND other plants, if present, consist of the "bog" species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation (more than 30% of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)? YES = Is a bog for purpose of rating NO = go to question 4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent or mosses in the understory you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hold dug at least 16" deep. If the pH is Jess than 5.0 and the "bog" plant species in Table 3 are present, the wetland is a bog. 4. Is the wetland forested(> 30% cover) with sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Englemann's spruce, or western white pine. WITH any of the species (or combination of species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover(> 30% coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover)? YES= Category I NO= Is not a bog for purpose of rating Cat. I Cat. I Cat. II Dual Rating 1/11 Cat I Cat. I P~P"e. 7 of8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SC4 Forested Wetlands (seep. 96) Does the wetland have at least 1 acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats?. lfyou answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its Junction. __ Old-growth forests: (west of Cascade Crest) Stands of at least two three species forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/acre (20 trees/hectare) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of32 inches (81 cm or more). NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests. Two-hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and "OR" so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. __ Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are 80-200 years old OR have an average diameters (dbh) exceeding 21 inches (53 cm); crown cover may be less than I 00%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth. Cat. I YES -Category I NO - SCS Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (seep. 92) Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? __ The wetland lies in a depressional adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks __ The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured near the bottom.) YES -Go to SC 5.1 NO ___ not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1 Does the wetland meet all of the following three conditions? __ The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing) and has less than 20% cover of invasive plant species (see list of invasive species on p. 74). __ At least 3/4 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft. buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. Cat. I __ The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre (4350 square ft.) YES= Category I NO -Category II Cat. II SC6 Interdunal Wetlands (seep. 94) Is the wetland west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? YES= Go to SC 6.1 NO ___ not an interdunal wetland for rating If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based 01t its functions. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: • Long Beach Peninsula --lands west of SR 103 • Grayland-Westport--lands west of SR 105 • Ocean Shores-Copalis -lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is one acre or larger? YES = Category II NO -go to SC 6.2 SC 6.2 Is the wetland between 0.1 and I acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and I acre? YES -Category III Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics <> Choose the "highest" rating if wetland falls into several categories, and record on p. 1. If you answered NO for all types enter "Not Applicable" on p. l Wetland Rating Fann-western Washington (l I/04) Cat. II Cat. III Page 8 of 8 I I I I I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I 8. CSWPPP ANALYSIS AND DESIGN: Design of the ESC plan was completed in conformance with Core Requirement #5 per the 2005 KCSWDM. Compliance with the 9 minimum requirements is summarized below. l. 2. 3. 4. 5. Clearing Limits: Clearing limits have been delineated on sheet C2.01 of the civil plans. The clearing limits extend only to those areas that will be disturbed during construction of the subject project. Cover Measures: The Erosion/Sedimentation Control Notes listed on sheet C2.31 of the civil plans specify specific times at which temporary and permanent cover measures will be installed. Perimeter Protection: Per sheet C2.0 I of the civil plans, silt fence will be used for perimeter protection. Silt fence will be installed along the perimeters of those areas that will be receiving silt-laden runoff. Traffic Area Stabilization: A construction entrance will be installed at the entrance to the project site. See sheets C2.01 and C2.31 for location of construction entrance and detail. Sediment Retention: The proposed detention/water quality vault will be used for sediment retention. Sediment retention will be designed per the 2005 KCSWDM Appendix D. Surface Area: Q 10 (06083dev.tsf) = 0.47 cfs (See attached KCRTS Flow Frequency Analysis in Section 48 of this Report) SA= 2080 sf/cfs • Q10 SA= 2080 sf/cfs • 0.47 cfs = 978 SF SA Provided= 2,584 SF> 978 SF => OK I I I I I I I I I I I I I . I I I I I I Dewater Orifice: The dewatering orifice will be placed at the outlet to the vault. The sizing of the orifice is below: As (2h) 0 ' Ao=----- 0.6x3600Tg0' Ao= 2,376 (2 x 3.5)5 294,166 Ao= 0.021 D=24x~ D = 24x ~0·~ 21 D=l.96" 6. Surface Water Collection: Interceptor swales will be used to direct all sediment- laden runoff to the sedimentation vault. See sheets C2.0l and C2.3 l for location of swales and details. 7. Dewatering Control: A note on sheet C2.0 I addresses the procedure for discharge/treatment of runoff from dewatering. 8. Dust Control: A note on sheet C2.0l addresses the procedure for dust control should soils become too dry. 9. Flow Control: The proposed detention/water quality facility will be used for sediment retention therefore, discharge from the facility will be per the Conservation (Level Two) Flow Control standard . Design of the SWPPS plan was completed in conformance with Section 2.3.l.4 in the 2005 KCSWDM. The ESC and SWPPS plan contains notes establishing what materials will not be allowed on the site along with notes describing BMPs for treatment of materials that will be on the site. Since no storage ofliquids including fuel will be allowed on the site, no spill prevention report and/or clean up report is required. Vehicle maintenance will not be allowed on the site. Storage of construction materials and wastes will be stored within a designated stockpile area. Any concrete waste or waste from sawcutting or surfacing will be discharged to formed areas awaiting installation of concrete or asphalt and/or to a lined sump as specified in the notes and shown on the ESC and SWPPS plan. The contractor shall designate a person as the responsible representative in charge of erosion control and maintenance of all erosion control and stormwater pollution prevention facilities. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 9. BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT: A blank "Declaration of Covenant and Grant of Easement" along with maintenance and operation instructions for the "Perforated Pipe Connection" and "Permeable Pavement" are attached on the following pages. The blank "Declaration of Covenant and Grant of Easement" will be filled out and recorded during final plat. The "Facility Summary Sheet" and "Bond Quantities Worksheet" will be submitted upon approval of plans. I 1, ,- 1 I I I I I I ii" I I I I I I I I I RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: RECORDING COVER SHEET DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT Grantor: -------------------- Grantee: -------------------- Legal Description:----------------------- Additional Legal(s) on:---------------------- Assessor's Tax Parcel 1D#: --------------------- I Ir ( I I I I I I I I ( \ I I I I I I I 1"-J I 3. King County shall have a nonexclusive perpetual access easement on the Property in order to ingress and egress over the Property for the sole purposes of inspecting and monitoring the Property's Flow Control BMPs, and if applicable in accordance with the terms of Paragraph 4 below, performing any corrective work required to bring the Property's Flow Control BMPs into compliance with Title 9 of the King County Code. 4. If King County determines that maintenance, repair, restoration, and/or mitigation work is required to be done to the Flow Control BMPs and has not _been performed by the Property owner(s), the Director of the Water and Land Resources Division of the King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks shall give notice to the Property owner (s) of the specific maintenance, repair, restoration, and/or mitigation work (Work) required pursuant to Title 9 of the King County Code. The Manager shall also set a reasonable time in which the Work is to be completed by the Property owner(s). If the Work is not completed within the time set by the Division Director, King County may perform the required Work. Written notice will be sent to the Property owner(s) stating King County's intention to perform the Work. Performance of the Work by King County will not commence until at least seven (7) days after such notice is mailed. If, within the sole discretion of the Water and Land Resources Division Director, there exists an imminent or present danger, the owner hereby waives the seven (7) day notice period and the Work will begin immediately. 5. The owner(s) of the Property shall assume all responsibility for the cost of any Work required to be done to the Flow Control BMPs. Such responsibility shall include reimbursement to King County within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the invoice for any such Work performed by King County in accordance with the terms of Paragraph 3 above. Overdue payments will require payment of interest at the current legal rate as liquidated damages. In the event that King County does not receive reimbursement within the required time frame, it may elect to place a lien on the 3 I I I I I I I Ir I I I I I I I ,(,_) I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Declaration of Covenant and Grant of Easement is executed this ______ day of ____________ ., 20_. ST ATE OF WASHINGTON) )SS COUNTY OF KING ) Its -------------- By _______________ _ Its -------------- On this day of , 20_, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of , duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared , to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he signed and sealed the said instrument ash free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. Printed name Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at _____________ _ My appointment expires --------- 5 ., I; I II I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Property and act upon the lien in accordance with the terms and procedures specified in Chapter 23.40 of the King County Code, as amended from time to time. If legal action is taken to enforce the provisions of this Paragraph, the prevailing party is entitled to costs and attorney's fees. 6. Apart from performing routine landscape maintenance, the Property owner(s) is (are) hereby required to obtain written approval from the Water and Land Resources Division Manager of the King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks prior to performing any alterations or modifications to the Flow Control BMPs. Any notice or consent required to be given or otherwise provided for by the provisions of this Declaration of Covenant and Grant of Easement shall be effective upon personal delivery, or three (3) days after mailing by Certified Mail, return receipt requested, whichever occurs sooner. 7. This Declaration of Covenant and Grant of Easement is intended to promote the efficient and effective management of surface water drainage on the Property, and it shall inure to the benefit of all the citizens of King County, its successors and assigns. This Declaration of Covenant and Grant of Easement shall run with the land and be binding upon Grantor(s), and Grantor's (s') successors in interest and assigns. 8. This Declaration of Covenant and Grant of Easement may be terminated by execution of a written agreement by Grantor(s) and King County expressing their mutual agreement to terminate this Declaration of Covenant and Grant of Easement. 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT For Stormwater Flow Control Best Management Practices IN CONSIDERATION of the following approved King County (check one of the following) D residential building permit, D commercial building permit, D clearing and grading permit, D subdivision permit, or D short subdivision permit for Application No .. _--------- relating to real property ("Property") legally described as follows: The Grantor(s), the owner(s) in fee of the above described parcel of land, hereby covenants with King County, a political subdivision of the state of Washington its successors in interest and assigns ("King County"), that it will observe, consent to, and abide by the conditions and obligations set forth and described in Paragraphs I and 2 and 4 through 7 below with regard to the Property, and hereby grants an access easement on and to the Property to King County, for the purposes described in Paragraph 3 below. Grantor(s) hereby grants, covenants, and agrees as follows: I. Owner(s) of the Property shall retain, uphold, and protect the stormwater management devices, features, pathways, limits, and restrictions, known as flow control best management practices ("Flow Control BMPs"), shown on the approved Flow Control BMP Site Plan for the Property attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. 2. Owner(s) of the Property shall at their own cost, operate, maintain, and keep in good repair, the Property's Flow Control BMPs as described in the approved Design and Maintenance Details for each BMP attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B. 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR PERFORATED PIPE CONNECTION Your property contains a stormwater management flow control BMP (best management practice) called a "perforated pipe connection," which was installed to reduce the stormwater runoff impacts of some or all of the impervious surface on your property. A perforated pipe connection is a length of drainage conveyance pipe with holes in the bottom, designed to "leak" runoff, conveyed to the pipe, into a gravel filled trench where it can be soaked into the surrounding soil. The connection is intended to provide opportunity for infiltration of any runoff that is being conveyed from an impervious surface (usually a roof) to a local drainage system such as a ditch or roadway pipe system. The size and composition of the perforated pipe connection as depicted by the flow control BMP site plan and design details must be maintained and may not be changed without written approval either from the King County Water and Land Resources Division or through a future development permit from King County. The soil overtop of the perforated portion of the system must not be compacted or covered with impervious materials. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION INSTRUCTIONS FORPERMEABLEPAVEMENT Your property contains a stormwater management flow control BMP (best management practice) called "permeable pavement," which was installed to minimize the stormwater quantity and quality impacts of some or all of the paved surfaces on your property. Permeable pavements reduce the amount of rainfall that becomes runoff by allowing water to seep through the pavement into a free-draining gravel or sand bed, where it can be infiltrated into the ground. The type of permeable pavement used on your property is permeable pavers. The area covered by permeable pavement as depicted by the flow control BMP site plan and design details must be maintained as permeable pavement and may not be changed without written approval either from the King County Water and Land Resources Division or through a future development permit from King County. Permeable pavements must be inspected after one major storm each year to make sure it is working properly. Prolonged ponding or standing water on the pavement surface is a sign that the system is defective and may need to be replaced. If this occurs, contact the pavement installer or the King County Water and Land Resources Division for further instructions. A typical permeable pavement system has a life expectancy of approximately 25-years. To help extend the useful life of the system, the surface of the permeable pavement should be kept clean and free ofleaves, debris, and sediment through regular sweeping or vacuum sweeping. The owner is responsible for the repair of all ruts, deformation, and/or broken paving units. (• "'' Web date· 06/29/2007 ti King County Department cf Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 DROP-OFF COVER SHEET FOR LUSD ONLY 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Drop-Off Cover Sheet for Land Use Services Division 0&000000000000000 IMPORTANT c,,0000000•••000000 DATE RECEIVED BY LUSD PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME IS NECESSARY f OR ALL DROP-OFFS Project No L. Di sf.. o·w Project Name PJ>.e.ao.aa-vt ft~ FROM fa~ ~J U){ZC, I)e,5tg~ Coqpany Nime / Contact Person 1 Telephone No _ 'Z, S: .--g'g',5:-7 g I TO @;le_~ ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY KING COUNTY STAFF (please print) Short Plat / Plats Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Lot Line Adjustment Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Right cf Way Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Clearing / Grading Permit -Additional information requested. Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Other: ;:,,: n ~ c;;a, r'1 C/) ...., = ~ :,,,, ,, ::0 I'\.) co ,, ::ir ~ ,I:" \D ~ it! fJ:.\, ;• rri <C f'TJ 0 PLEASE NOTE: All drop-off item(s) will be logged into the computer under the project number, therefore, it is important that the top portion of this form is completed properly before you drop-off anything. Assistance in finding a project number can be provided by speaking to a Zoning/Land Use Technician. Your cooperation is important. Thank you. Check out the DDES Web site at www.kingcounty.gov/permits Drop-OffCoverSheet-LUSDOnlyFORM.doc Jg-cvs-dropoff.pdf 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 1 / ~ ~O~FE ~DESIGN ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYING DATE: 4-28-08 TO: King County DOES ATTN: Pete Dye CORE PROJECT NO: REFERENCE: FROM: SENDING VIA: Core De•lgn, Inc. 14711 N.E. 29th Place, Suite 101 Bellevue, Washington 98007 425.885.7877 Fax 425.885.7963 www.coredesigninc.com 06083 Pleasant Path L08SR020 Robert Stevens, P.E. ADDRESS: 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055 0 MAIL O PICK-UP [8] HAND DELIVER 0 COURIER 01-HR D 2-HR 0 4-HR 0 OVERNIGHT QUANTITY DATED DESCRIPTION 3 Tech. Information Report (TIR) 3 Road, Grade and Storm Drawings 1 Sewer Drawing 1 Water Drawing 1 Check $765 1 Cert. of Applicant Status TRANSMITTED: [8] FOR YOUR USE [8] PER YOUR REQUEST ACTION REQUIRED: D PROCESSING 0 REPLY 0 RETURN 0 INFORMATION ONLY [8] NONE COMMENTS: For your review. Thank you. CC: Robert Johnseine BY: ~rn@rnowrn@ APR 28 ?008 K.C. D.D.E.S. ~cl ~obert Ste,eo,, P .E. V tQ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: Johnseine Robert Activity Number: L08SR020 Project Number: L07S0018 Development Number: _______ _ DDES Review Engineer:----------- Notes: Date: ---- OK [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l Hearing Examiner's Report .... Date: ___ Revised Report ..... Date: ___ _ Plat Ordinance Number: _____ Date: _____ _ Preliminary Plat Map ......... Date Approved by Hearing Examiner: ___ _ Revised Preliminary Plat Map ......... Date Approved by ODES: ____ _ 5-year Expiration .......... Date: (Show on engineering cover sheet) ROUTING TO OTHER KING COUNTY SECTIONS [ l Wetland Report/Plans: Route Date: ___ _ Response date: ____ _ [ l Geotechnical Report/Plans: Route Date: ___ _ Response date: ____ _ [ l Grading Report/Plans: Route Date: ___ _ Response date: ____ _ [ ] Structural Designs/Calculations/Civil Plans/Soils Report (Vaults, Retaining Walls, Bridges) Route Date: Response date: ____ _ [ l Landscape/Recreation/Street Tree/Plan: Route Date: Response date: [ l Traffic Improvement Plan/Report: Route Date: Response date: [ l Tree Retention/Forestry/Plan: Route Date: Response date: [ l Other Report/Plan Route Date: Response date: [ l Site Inspections -Constructability Route Date: Response date: [ ] All required routing stations shown and updated on PRMS Updated 04/07 Activuy Number: _______ _ GENERAL SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS [ ] Site plan layout matches preliminary plat approved by Hearing Examiner (Check for same lot count, tract configuration, road alignments, etc ... ) [ ] Compliance with conditions of preliminary approv.al [ ] Compliance with Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance [ ] Tract Table if three or more tracts. Identify name, size and purpose. [ ] Show and label all SAO tracts, buffers, and I 5' BSBL. [ ] Review maximum height of 6-feet for rockeries and retaining walls per KCC 2 IA.12.030, 110-170, 220) Also show standard note per policy on web site. [ ] Use updated cover sheet showing designation for highly sensitive sites per Appendix, D73. [ ] Determine ifHPA fisheries permit required-contact CAO staff. [ ] Tree Retention Plans -Show standard plan note (see section policies). SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL (2005) CORE AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS OK SWDM [ ] I .2.1 Core# I -Evaluate diversion of drainage within subbasins, discharge of unconcentrated [ l [ l 1.2.2 1.2.3 runoff, and/or tightline requirements for landslide hazard drainage areas. Core #2 -Offsite' analysis. Evaluate adequacy and conclusions. Core #3 -Flow control. Determine design standard based upon mapping and/or offsite analysis. Evaluate exemptions from flow control if applicable. Also evaluate target surfaces and BMP criteria. [ ] 1.2.6 Core #6 -All drainage facilties and road access shall be located in public tracts, right-of- way and/or drainage easements dedicated to King County. For private facilities, specify the required Declaration of Covenant and drainage easements for final recording. [ ] 1.2.8 Core #8 -Water Quality. Determine design standard based upon mapping and/or offsite analysis. Evaluate need for enhanced basic water quality based upon five land use types, including subdivision density~> 8 units per acre developed area. Also evaluate exemptions if applicable and untreated discharge per page 1-67. [ ] 1.3. I Special# I -Area specific requirements. Perform P-suffix search on computer, evaluate grading code restrictions, critical drainage areas, and review for shared facility drainage plan. [ ] 1.3.2 Special #2 -Floodplain boundaries and channel migration areas shown on plans. DRAINAGE ADJUSTMENTS [ l 1.4 Activity No. ______ _ Design Issues PLANS REQUIRED FOR DRAINAGE REVIEW 2.1.2 Site Improvement Plans ESC Plan Approval Date: _____ _ [ l [ l [ l [ l Stormwater pollution plan (SWPPS) Technical Information Report (TJR) Updated 04/07 Page 2 of 15 Activity Number:. _______ _ TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT OK [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l I l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l SWDM 2.3.1.1 Section 1 -Project Overview Figure I: TIR Worksheet Figure 2: Site Location Figure 3: Drainage Basins a. Acreage of subbasins. b. Identify all site characteristics c. Show existing discharge points to and from the site d. Show routes of existing, construction, and future flows at all discharge points and downstream hydraulic structures. e. Use a minimum USGS I :2400 topographic map as a base f. Show and cite the length of travel from the farthest upstream end of a proposed storm system in the development to any proposed flow control facility. Figure 4: Soils a. Show the project site. b. the area draining to the site. c. the drainage system downstream for the distance of the downstream analysis. Section 2 -Preliminary Conditions Summary with responses Section 3 -Off-Site Analysis Section 4-Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design Existing Site Hydrology (Part A)-Topographical map with listed site information. Developed Site Hydrology (Part B) -Data/narrative for developed site conditions. Performance Standards (Part C)-Summarize flow control and BM P's. Flow Control System (Part 0)-Illustrative sketch and documentation. Water Quality System (Part E) -Illustrative sketch and documentation. Section 5 -Conveyance System Design and Analysis Section 6 -Special Reports and Studies -Geo, Wetlands, Flood analysis (4.4.2), etc. Section 7 -Other Permits ( HPA, Special Use, WSDOT, etc .... ) Section 8 -Design Requirements for Erosion/Sedimentation Control and Stormwater Pollution (SWPPS) Section 9. -Bond Quantities Worksheet, RID Facility Summary, Private Covenants Section 10 -Maintenance and Operations Manual (Section IO for privately maintained or special non-standard features) SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS OK [ l [ l [ l SWDM 2.3. l.2 Vertical Datum NA VD 1988 -show benchmark Horizontal Control NAD 1983/91 Base Map per table 2.3. I .A 2.3.1.2 General Plan Format [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l Updaled 04/07 (I) Sheet size 24" X 36"; quality reproducible (2) King Co. Standard Map Symbols; existing/proposed (Reference 7A) (3) Project Information/Cover Sheet a. Title: Project name and ODES file number b. Table of Contents if more than 3 plan sheets c. Vicinity Map d. Name & Phone of Utility field contacts and One Call Number: 1-800-424-5555 (water, sewer, gas, power ... ) e. Preconstruction/lnspection notification requirements f. Name and Phone of erosion control supervisor g. Name & Phone of Surveyor Page 3 of 15 OK [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l SWDM 2.3.1.2 Activny Number: _______ _ SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS (cont.) h. Name & Phone of Owner/Agent i. Name & Phone of Applicant j. Legal description k. Plan approval block for ODES I. Name & Phone of engineering firm preparing plans m. Fire Marshal's approval stamp (if required) n. Mailbox location approval by U.S. Postal Service o. List of conditions of preliminary approval on all site improvements (4) An overall site plan if more than three plan sheets are used. a. The complete property area development b. Right-of-way information c. Street names and road classification d. All project phasing and proposed division boundaries e. All natural and proposed drainage collection and conveyance systems with catch basin numbers shown (5) Each sheet and TIR is stamped, signed, and dated by a Professional Engineer licensed in Washington State. Survey control plan sheet stamped by licensed PLS in Washington State (6) Detail Sheets Provided (7) Title block on each sheet a. Development title b. Name, address and phone number of engineering firm c. Revision block d. Page numbering e. Sheet title (e.g., road and drainage, grading, etc.) (8) King County approval block on each plan sheet. (9) The location and label for each section or other detail shall be provided. (I 0) Critical Areas with buffers and setbacks. (II) All match lines correspond to the sheet referenced (12) Division phase lines with limits of construction (13) Wetlands with inventory numbers ' (14) Standard Plan Notes -General, Drainage, & Structural notes (Reference 7B) Plan View: Site Plan and Roadway Elements (I) Property lines, R/W lines, roadway widths shown (2) Existing/Proposed road features; CL, edge pavement, edge shoulder, ditches, curb, sidewalk, & access pts (3) Existing/Proposed Topographic Contours@ 2', 5'> 15% slope, 10'>40% slope (4) All affected utilities are shown; utility poles marked (5) All roads and adjoining subdivisions identified (6) Existing/Proposed R/W dimensioned and shown (7) Existing/Proposed surfacing shown (8) Scale generally 1"=50' (1"=100' forlots>l Acre) 2.3.1.2 Plan View: Drainage Conveyance [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l Updated 04/07 Sequentially number all catch basins and curb inlets Show length, diameter, and material for all pipes, culverts, and stubouts Label catch basin size and type Show stub out locations for roof drains Label all drainage easements, access easements, tracts, and building setbacks Provide flow arrows for drainage direction. Page 4 of 15 Activity Number:. _______ _ SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS (cont.) [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l Notes:· SWDM 2.3.1.2 Plan View: Other Show all buildings, property lines, streets, alleys, and easements. Verify condition of public right-of-way. Show structures on abutting properties within 50 feet Identify fencing for drainage facilities Provide section details of all retaining walls and rockeries Show all wells on site and within I 00-feet of site. For well abandonment, include notes referencing DOE procedures. Show flow control BMP's and source control BM P's for SWPPS. 2.3.1.2 Profiles: Roadway and Drainage Existing/Proposed roadway centerline {CL) at 50' stations increasing, reading from left to right. Show stationing of points of smooth vertical curve, with elevations Show vertical curve data including stopping sight distance Show all pipes and detention tanks with slope, length, size, type Show all pipe inverts and elevations of catch basins or lids Minimum cover dimensions if less than 2.0' Indicate roadway stationing and offset for all catch basins. Show vertical and horizontal scales (vertical I"= 5') Label all profiles with street names and reference numbers to plan sheet. Show all property boundaries and match line locations. Provide profiles for conveyance systems of 12" and larger pipes or channels other than roadway ditches Catch basin lids are flush with ground line 2.3.1.2 Plan Details Provide scale drawing of each pond, vault, or water quality facility. Include all pipe details for size, type, slope, length, etc. Show existing and final grade contours at 2-foot intervals. Show maximum design water elevation. Dimension all berm widths. Provide two cross sections through pond, including one section through restrictor. Specify soils and compaction requirements Show location and detail of emergency overflows, spillways, and bypasses. Specify rock protection/energy dissipation details Provide inverts for all pipes, grates, etc. and spot elevations on pond bottom. Show location of access roads to control manholes and pond/fore bay bottoms. Provide plan and section views of all energy dissipaters. Specify size and thickness of rock. Show bollard locations (Typically at entrance to drainage facility and walking trails). Restrictor and control structures must have section and plan view drawn to scale. 2.3.1.2 Structural Plan Details Verify that designer is a licensed structural P.E. for vaults or bridges. Page 5 of 15 Updated 04/07 Activ1cy Number: _______ _ EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (SWDM Appendix D) [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l SWDM 2.3.1.3 General Specifications 2.3.1.4 D.3.1 D.3.2 D.3.3 D3.4 Separate plan sheet showing entire site w/features. Show sensitive areas and buffers in separate tracts. Show existing contours and final grades if scope of work includes grading. Pertinent information from soils report is added to plans. Drainage features identified (streams, wetlands, bogs, springs, seeps, swales, ditches, pipes, & depressions). Utility corridors other than roads shown. Show drainage divides and flow directions. Specify best management practices. Show cut and fill slopes with catch lines indicated. Sufficient conceptual details to convey design intent. Standard ESC plan notes shown on plans (Page D-92). For grading and structural fill within lot areas -show standard notes for geotechnical work. (See section policies for geo notes) Storm Water Pollution Prevention and Spill Plan (SWPPS) A. Activity Specific Information B. SWPPS Site Plan C. Pollution Prevention Report D. Spill Prevention and Cleanup Report Clearing Limits (I) Delineate clearing limits -colored survey tape may be used. Sensitive areas require plastic/metal safety fence or stake and wire fences. (2) Provide detail of fencing Cover Measures (I) Specify the type and location of temporary and permanent cover measures. Mulch, erosion control nets, blankets, plastic, seeding and sodding. (2) Specify the seed mixes, fertilizers, and soil amendments to be used and applications rates. (3) Areas receiving special treatment are specified Qute netting, rock lining, or sod). (4) Soil cover practices and locations of disturbed areas. Perimeter Protection (I) Specify the location and type of perimeter protection to be used -silt fence, brush barriers, and/or vegetated strips. (2) Provide details and specify type of fabric for silt fence. Traffic Area Stabilization (I) Show construction entrance with detail (Fig. D.3.4.A). (2) Show proposed construction roads and parking areas. Specify details for stabilization. D.3.5 Sediment Retention [ ] (1) Show location of sediment pond or sediment trap. Very small areas can be treated [ l [ l [ l Updated 04/07 with only perimeter protection (See D.3.3). (2) Sediment Trap -Can be used for drainage areas 3 acres or less. Calculate surface area using 2-year design storm. Show detail per Figure D.3.5.A. (3) Sediment Pond-Determine pond geometry and show details on plan for required storage, depth, length, and width. (4) Show sediment pond cross section and detail (Figures D.3.5.B,C,D) Page 6 of 15 Act1v1ty Number:. _______ _ EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (SWDM Appendix D) (cont.) OK [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l SWDM (5) (6) (7) (8) Provide details of cell dividers and stabilization techniques for inlet/outlet. Specify mulch or recommended cover of berms & slopes. Specify the I-foot marker for sediment removal. Indicate catch basins for protection and show design details (Fig. D.3.5.E,F,G,H). D.3.6 Surface Water Collection {I) Show conveyance of all surface water to a sediment pond or trap. (2) Discharge location shall be downslope from disturbed areas. (3) Show details for conveyance with interceptor dike, swales. (Figures D.3 .6.B,C). ( 4) For ditches, determine capacity for I 0-year storm with 0.5 feet freeboard. Show details for check dams (Fig. D.3 .6.E). Determine check dam spacing and as needed, show inverts and minimum slopes ofopen channels. Also show direction of open channel flow. (5) For pipe slope drains, determine capacity for JO-year storm. Show details per Fig. D.3.6.D. (6) Determine level of protection for outlet (rock pad, outfall design, or level spreader). See requirements in D-63 through D-64. (7) Evaluate offsite flows entering the site and assure bypass of disturbed areas. D.5.1 ESC Plan (I) Show detailed construction sequence {page D-93). (2) All required calculations and soils reports contained in TIR. (3) For large projects, determine need for phased clearing. D.5.2 Wet Season Requirements [ J (I) Provide a list of all applicable wet season requirements. (Details on page D-72) [ l D.5.3 Critical Area Restrictions (I) Consider phased construction during the dry season. See special recommendations on page D-72/73. D.5.4 Maintenance Requirements [ ] (I) Plans shall list the name, address and phone number of the ESC Supervisor. A sign. [ l [ l shall also be posted on the construction site with information for contacting the ESC supervisor. See KCC 20.20.060(1) and web site policy for sign details. (2) Determine if site is Highly Sensitive (Soil Types C or D, 5 acres of disturbance, large areas with slopes> I 0%, proximity to streams, wetlands, or lakes). (3) On cover sheet of engineering plans, designate if highly sensitive site. D.5.6 NPDES Requirements [ ] (I) Determine if project will disturb more than I acre. [ ] (2) If disturbed area is greater than I acre, show the following note on the plans: "No construction or site disturbance for this project may begin before the applicant first obtains a General Permit to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity permit from the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE). For more information or application form, please visit DOE's web site at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/9937.pdf D.S. 7 Forest Practices Permit [ ] (I) Determine if project needs FPA permit. Contact DOES grading section. [ ] (2) Provide a reference note on the cover sheet indicating whether or not a FPA permit has been obtained. Page 7 of 15 Updated 04/07 Activity Number: _______ _ EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (SWDM Appendix D} (cont.} <?K SWDM Early Start Plan Review [ ] ( l) Standard Cover sheet included with Title for Phased Early Start. [ ] (2) List the scope of work for early start (Scope of work will vary for each project - Evaluate clearing, grading for roads, lot grading, utility installation, vault construction, offsite work) [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l (3) Update the sheet index to identify all plans with updated page numbers. (4) Include standard ESC plan prepared in accordance with all requirements listed above for erosion and sediment control. (5) Include pollution control plan elements as required by SWDM( pg 2-l 6, 2-28) (6) Include detailed construction sequence and identify ESC supervisor. (7) Show standard erosion control notes. (8) Show early start activity number on all plan sheets. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS OK SWDM [ l [ l [ l 3.2 Runoff Computation Rational Method required for onsite conveyance (See Table 3 .2) KCRTS used for flow control design Evaluate correct data: Rainfall region, scale factor, time step, record type, acreages, soil cover groups, and percent impervious. (See correct time steps -page 3-23) [ ] l-29 For Conservation Flow Control, apply historic site condition for predevelopment [ ] 3-27 For urban areas, unprotected forest modeled as pasture or grass [ ] For rural areas, unprotected forest assumes 50% grass, 50% pasture [ ] All pre developed grassland modeled as pasture [ ] All post developed grassland modeled as grass [ ] Impervious coverage calculated based upon specific project -clearly summarize types and [ l [ l amounts of impervious. For urban development, impervious for each lot,>= 4,000 sq ft or maximum allowed in zoning code. For rural development, impervious for each lot,>= 8,000 sq ft or maximum allowed in zoning code. [ ] Evaluate requirements for modeling with effective impervious area. [ ] 3.3.6 Point of compliance -evaluate for onsite bypass and offsite closed depression. [ ] 3.3.7 Onsite closed depressions and ponding areas. [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l 4.0 Conveyance System Analysis and Design Conveyance systems are in easements of correct width with BSBL's. Offsite easements must be recorded using standard fonns (Reference 8L) Determine which easements are public and private, label and dimension. Pipes are parallel to and alongside property lines 4-7 Minimum pipe size 12-inch. Private systems may allow 8 inch. Show easements for pipes extending outside right of way. 4-9/10 For connecting pipes at structures, match crowns, 80% diameter, or inverts For connections to manholes, pipes 12 " and smaller do not need to match crowns or inverts. 4-1 l Minimum velocity at full flow 3.0 feet per second. 4-1 l Minimum cover for pipes 2 feet. 4-13 Debris barrier for pipes 18-36 inch 4-29 Outfall design criteria Surcharges (backwater analysis may be required) 4-38 Trash Racks 4-37 Maximum headwater allowed for culverts 4-53 Bridge design 4-55 Open channels 4-71 Floodplain analysis Page 8 of 15 Updated 04/07 Activity Number:. _______ _ DESGN REQUIREMENTS (cont) 5.2 [ l [ l 5-6 [ l 5-7 [ l 5-8 [ l Flow Control BMP Requirements Determine if project proposes BM P's as flow control credits. If credits not proposed, skip to (A) below. Small Lot BMP's -Demonstrate feasibility of full dispersion and/or full infiltration. If not feasible, choose other BMP's as listed. Large Lot Low Impervious BMP's -Demonstrate feasibility of full dispersion and/or full infiltration. If not feasible, choose other BMP's as listed. Large Lot High Impervious BMP's -Demonstrate feasibility offull dispersion. If full dispersion not feasible, choose other BMPS's as listed. For any BMP chosen, designate which lots are proposed for BMP's and show appropriate design details from Appendix C. [ ] 5-12 Evaluate facility sizing credits for flow control BMP's. [ ] 5-13 Evaluate BMP's within road right-of-way. [ ] 5-13 Evaluate BMP's within dedicated tracts. [ ] 5-14 Evaluate BMP implementation requirements on individual lots and perform lot-specific [ l [ l [ l Updated 04/07 assessment to determine feasibility. Determine which of the following four scenarios apply for site development: (A) Flow control credits are not used and all BMP issues are deferred to the building permit review process. In this case, the engineer_ing plans shall show roof drain connections for all lots and the following note must be shown on the design plans: "The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: "Permit applications for buildings or other improvements constructed on lots created by this subdivision must _be reviewed by King County for compliance with best management practices (BM P's) and other applicable drainage standards as specified in the King County Surface Water Design Manual. As determined necessary by King County, the permit applicant for each lot must prepare a drainage site plan with procedures for design and maintenance details, and record a declaration of covenant and grant of easement for implementaiion of the best management practices." (B) Flow control credits are used for sizing the drainage facility and the plat developer will implement the required BMP's as part of the subdivision process. This will occur only for certain types ofBMP's such as full dispersion to an open space tract, full infiltration for entire plat, or construction of a joint use rain garden located within a separate tract. The feasibility of BMP's has been determined with design details shown on the plans including roof drain connections. In this case, the final plat must record a note indicating that BMP requirements are satisfied and building permit review is not required. Additional notes are needed to specify tract ownership and maintenance requirements for BMP facilities and the standard declaration of covenant easement shown in the drainage manual (Reference 8M) shall be recorded as necessary. Show the following notes on the engineering plan: I) The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: "Single family residences and other improvements constructed on lots created by this subdivision shall connect roof downspouts and drains from other impervious surfaces to the permanent storm drain outlet shown on the approved construction drawings for this subdivision. All storm drain connections must be constructed and approved prior to final building inspection approval. The designs for best management practices (BMP's) as required by the King County drainage manual have been satisfied during development of the subdivision and no further drainage review is required for individual building permits." 2) The Declaration of Covenant and Grant of Easement shown in Reference Section 8M of the King County drainage manual shall apply to Tracts ___ and be recorded with the final plat. Page 9 of 15 Activity Number:. _______ _ DESIGN REQUIREMENTS {cont\ SWDM (C) Flow control credits are used for sizing the drainage facility and the plat developer · chooses to defer implementation ofBMP's to the building pennit process. This process would apply for certain types of BMP's such as lot infiltration, limited infiltration, basic dispersion, individual lot rain gardens, permeable pavement, reduced impervious surface within lots areas, etc ... The subdivision review will demonstrate the feasibility of certain types ofBMP's for all or some lots and design details are shown on the plans. In this case, the recorded plat would contain a note requiring future review of building permits as shown on page 5-14 in the drainage manual. At the time of plat recording, the declaration of covenant and grant of easement must also be recorded for specified lots. The following notes shall be shown on the engineering plans: I) The Declaration of Covenant and Grant of Easement shown in Reference Section 8M of the King County drainage manual shall apply to lots __ and be recorded with the final plat. 2) The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: "Single family residences and other improvements constructed on lots (lots numbered_,_, ) created by this subdivision must implement the flow control best management practices (BM P's) stipulated in the drainage plan declaration of covenant and grant of easement recorded for each lot. Compliance with the stipulation must be addressed in the small project drainage plan submitted for drainage review when application is made for a single family residential building pennit for the lot." (D) Flow control facilities may not be required for certain types of subdivisions which meet the flow control exemption criteria; however, the building permits must still comply with BMP requirements in the drainage manual. In this case, the recorded subdivision must contain notes indicating the need for drainage review of each building pennit. Show the following note on the engineering plans: "The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: "Single family residences· and other improvements constructed on lots created by this subdivision must be reviewed by King County for compliance with best management practices (BMP's) and other applicable drainage standards as required by the King County Surface Water Design Manual."'' [ ] 5-14 Demonstrate compliance with details for declaration of covenant and grant of easement including site plans and maintenance details. For either of options B or C shown above, the following note shall also be shown on the engineering plans: " The final plat shall record the required maintenance responsibilities and declaration of covenant and grant of easement as described in the drainage manual on page 5-9 for each lot within the subdivision required to implement drainage BMP's. [ l For any connection of roof downspouts to the local drainage system, use perforated pipe connection per Appendix C, page C-77. [ l Use of credits by projects within rights-of-way. 5.3 Detention Facilities [ ] Emergency overflow -Evaluate flow path for safe and adequate conveyance [ ] Setbacks [ ] Flow-through system [ ] 5.3.1 Detention Ponds [ ] Dam Safety Compliance [ ] Two cross-sections through pond (one x-section to include control structure) [ ] Review pond details in Figures 5.3.1.A and B. [ ] Designed as flow-through system [ ] Side slopes interior 3H: IV or fenced Page 10 of 15 Updated 04/07 Activity Number:. _______ _ DESIGN REQUIREMENTS (cont) OK [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l SWDM Vertical interior retaining walls Stamped by licensed structural civil engineer. For pond walls, min. 25% of perimeter vegetated and no steeper than 3: I. Minimum top width of berm 6 feet. Berms greater than 4 feet require key excavation. Primary overflow (control structure with riser). Secondary Inlet to the control structure. Emergency Overflow Spillway, 100 year de~eloped peak flow Soil and compaction requirements described (95% modified proctor) Access road min. turning radius, maximum grade, min. width, fences or gates. Pond sign (Figure 5.3. 1.D) 2Fencing and planting requirements. Setbacks -5 feet from tow of exterior slope or 5 feet from water surface for cut slope 5.3.2 Detention Tanks Flow-through system required 6" of dead storage in tank bottom. Minimum pipe diameter of36". Materials and structural stability. Control structure per Section 5.3.4 Buoyancy Access risers and CBs are spaced properly with max. depth from finished grade to tank invert shall be 20 feet and accessible by maintenance vehicles. Hanging sign required for OSHA confined space requirements. [ ] 5.3.3 Detention Vaults [ ] Structural package submitted for approval [ ] Flow-through system required [ ] Review design details per Fig. 5.3.3.A, Note: grate over sump with 2' x 2' hinged access door. (2x2 access door also required for Sx IO grate if over inlet or outlet). [ l Access positioned a maximum of 50 feet from any location. (if over 3 foot cover use cone riser). Access required to inlet pipe and outlet [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l For vault under roadway, removable panel located outside travel lanes. Hanging sign required for OSHA confined space requirements. Removable 5xl O panel if vault greater than 1250 sq. ft. floor area. Maximum depth from finished grade to vault invert to be 20 feet. Minimum internal height shall be 7 feet, min. width shall be 4 feet min. Ventilation pipes provided in all four corners. [ ] 5.3.4 Control Structures [ ] Section and plan view shown to scale [ ] Orifice size and elevation on plans match calculations. Minimum orifice 0.5'' [ ] (Note: Information Plate details are no longer required -See policy on web site). [ ] 5.4 Infiltration Facilities [ ] Appropriate soils logs and testing procedures in TIR. [ ] Pond bottom at least 3 feet above seasonal high water [ ] Permeable soil extends minimum 3 feet below bottom of pond. [ ] Geotechnical report states suitability and determines design infiltration rate. [ ] Overflow route identified with I 00-yr overflow conveyance. [ ] Spill Control device upstream of facility. [ ] Presettling [ ] Review setback requirements, page 5-60. Design water surface setback of 20 feet from external tract, easement or property lines. [ l Show standard note regarding public rule for in operation facility (see section policies) Page 11 of 15 Updated 04/07 Activrcy Number: ______ _ DESIGN REQUIREMENTS (cont.} SWDM 6.0 Water Quality Design [ l 6.1 Water Quality Menus [ l 6.2. Water Quality facilities [ l 6.2.2A Water Quality Sequencing [ l 6.2.3 Setbacks, slopes and embankments [ l 6.2.4 Facility Liners [ l 6.2.5 Flow Splitter Designs [ l 6.3 Biofiltration Facility [ l 6.3.1 Biofiltration swales and soil amendments [ l 6.3 .1.1 Methods of Analysis [ l 6.3.1 Swale geometry, plantings, flow conveyance, high flows, velocity. [ l Road access requirements, page 6-43. [ l 6.3.4 Filter strip geometry (slopes) [ l 6.4 Wetpool Facility Designs [ l Wetpool geometry, 2 cells, minimum depth of.first cell 4 feet. [ l Flowpath length to width ratio 3: I, without internal berms or walls. [ l 6.4. I .2 Berms, Baffles, Slopes [ l Inlet/Outlet Design [ l 6.4.1.1 Access, setbacks, and plantings [ l 6.4.2 Wetvaults [ l 6.4.1.1 Sizing basic or large [ l 6.4. I. I Berms, Baffles, Slopes [ l 6.4.2.2 Two cells separated by wall or removable baffle. [ l Vault bottom forms a broad "V" with 5% sideslopes. [ l Inlet is submerged and outlet pipe designed for I 00-year overflow. [ l Gravity drain provided if grade allows [ l Minimum 50 square feet of grate over second cell. [ l 5-foot minimum wet pool depth based on inlet design criteria. [ l 6.4.3 Stormwater Wetlands [ l 6.4.3.1 Methods of Analysis [ l 6.4.3.2 Design Criteria -Wetland geometry, liners, access, plantings [ l 6.4.4 Combination Detention and Wctpool facilities [ l 6.4.4.1 Methods of Analysis [ l 6.4.4.2 Design Criteria -Detention and wetpool geometry, berms, baffles, slopes [ l 6.4.4.2 Access and plantings [ l 6.5 Media Filtration Facility Designs [ l 6.5.1 Pre-settling/Pre-treatment [ l 6.5.2 Sandfilters -Basic and Large [ l 6.5.2. I Methods of analysis [ l 6.5.2.2 Design Criteria -Geometry, overflow/bypass, underdrain, and access [ l 6.5.3 Sandfilter Vaults [ l 6.5.3.2 Design Criteria -geometry, pretreatment, flow-spreading, energy dissipation, [ l 6.5.3.2 Overflow/bypass, underdrain and access NOTES: Page 12 of 15 Updated 04/07 OK [ l [ l [ l [ l Code 16.82.100 16.82.150 16.82.152 16.82.156 Activity Number:. ______ _ CLEARING AND GRADING CODE KCC 16.82 Soil Amendments -Sections F and G. Note: For subdivision review, apply soil amendments to disturbed areas outside lots. Building permits will be reviewed separately. Clearing standards for individual lots in rural zones. Clearing standards for subdivisions in rural residential zone. Significant trees within the urban growth area NOTES: KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS (1993) 1993 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS [ ] 1.0 General Considerations . [ ] 1.03 A, B Offsite and frontage improvements determined by reviewing agency. Note: For grading permits, the required extent of road improvements must be determined during engineering review. For subdivisions, the requirements are determined during preliminary review. [ ] 1.03 D Subdivisions must have recorded public access except for private roads. [ ] 1.08 Variances: [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l Activity No. ______ _ Approval Date: ____ _ Design Issues 2.0 Design & Geometric Requirements ROAD CLASSIFICATION TABLE Name of Roadwav KCRS Classification 2.03C 2.030 2.03E 2.03F 2.03G 2.03H 2.031 2.03J Maximum Superelevation (2.05) Horizontal curvature (2.05) Maximum grade (2.11) Stopping Sight Distance (2.05, 2.12) Entering Sight Distance (2.05, 2.13) Minimum pavement width (Note: Footnote 9 -Neighborhood collectors require 36-feet at approach to intersections with arterials) Minimum roadway width Minimum R/W width Page 13 of 15 Updated 04/07 Activity Number.: _______ _ 1993 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS (cont.) [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l [ l 2.03) Min. R/W width (Footnote 12 and 2.198 -include 1 foot extra ROW behind curb or sidewalk) 2.03K Curb or shoulder type road (2.01) 2.03L Minimum Half-Street width 2.06 Private Street Design Standards 2.0687 Verify maximum potential of 16 lots 2.07 Half Streets 2.08A Minimum Cul-de-Sac diameters 2.088 Maximum Cul-de-Sac length 2.08E Maximum Cross Slope 6% 2.08F Bulb island shall be offset 2-feet 2.09 Alleys 2.098 Private Access Tracts (Note: Must meet all standards for minor access street, except cut driveway design is allowed with property line radii dedication) 2.lOA 2.lOA 2.lOA 2.108 2.lOC 2.lOE 2.1 IA 2.118 2.12D 2.16 2.18 2.20 3.0 3.01 3.01 3.02A 3.028 3.05 3.09 3.10 3.11 4.0 4.01 4.0lF 4.0lF 4.02 4.02 4.03 4.05 5.0 5.01 5.02 5.03 Angle of intersection between 85 and 95 degrees Intersection curb radius Intersection right-of-way radius Intersection spacing Intersection landing Low Speed Curves Maximum Grade -Use AC for grades> 12%, Use PCC for grades >20% Grade Brakes -maximum 1 % at intersections Intersection stopping sight distance (125' SSD allowed for local access streets) Bus zones -For arterials and neigh. collectors, the designer shall contact metro. Intersections with State Highways Single access serving more than 100 lots Driveways, Walkways & Trails Driveways Joint Use Driveways Sidewalks (both sides for subcollectors and higher classification) Location and width Handicapped access ramp (Use updated detail from KC Road Engineer, 3/26/04) School Access -asphalt walkway, sidewalk, or delineated shoulder. Bikeways Equestrian Facilities Surfacing Road Section and Surfacing (Drawings 1-00 I --1-006) Note: Neighborhood collectors require 3-inch asphalt concrete Perform saw cut of pavement at fog line. Pavement overlay for widening and channelization (show special note as approved by Development Engineer -see web site) Residential street design Poor subgrade evaluation Arterial pavement design Pavement markings, channelization, and tapers (Requires DOT review) Roadside Features Rock facings (Dwg. Nos. 5-004 -5-007) Side slopes, generally 2H: lV Street trees and landscaping Mail boxes (Dwg. Nos. 5-010-5-012) Street illumination Survey Monuments to be disturbed are shown Roadway Barricades curb 5.04 5.05 5.06 5.07 5.08 5. I I Bollards for walkways or maintenance roads Roadside obstacles (Note: If variance required for utility ·pole, the utility company must 6.0 6.02 6.03 apply for the variance. , Bridges Bridges (minimum width 28-feet) Approach slabs Page 14 of 15 Updated 04/07 Activity Number:. ______ _ 1993 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS (cont.) [ ] 7.0 Drainage [ ] 7.02A-D Grass-lined, pipe or rock lined, special designed ditch [ ) 7.03A Minimum pipe size 12-inch diameter [ ] 7.03L Beveled ends for culverts in ROW [ ] 7.04A Maximum spacing between catch basins [ ] 7 .04B Inlets not allowed for collecting water from road surfaces. [ ] 7 .04E CBs taller than 5' (grate to invert) are Type II, Max. depth 12-feet r,er Dwg. 2-005 Deeper pipes require Manholes in Dwg. 2-007 through 2-0 I 0 [ ] 7.05A Vaned grates [ ] 7 .05B Through curb inlet frames for sag curves and intersections> 4%. Notes: a) Through curb inlet shall not used on rolled curb, b) See web site for policy on flanking inlets. [ ] 7.05D Use round locking covers for new catch basins in roadway which do not collect runoff. [ ] 7 .05E All covers and grates shall be locking [ l [ l [ l 7.0 8.02 8.03B NOTES: Updated 04/07 Utilities Utility pole locations and other obstacles. Open cuts on existing roadways, patch requirements Pagel5ofl5 ~ ~QMQC;;i(§j f~j ~ Cn~; o ~CJCil o ~f!@J4 "?.rt i£l ·-. - King County Employees Deferred Compensation Plan. w~ M&i~~ n1r ~&.~if. 888-457-5770 i -)../ -t:Fj f J-_,/ b()gs?•W 7/J lfr!·lvn ,v0- . ew~ 1 7 / to] 5111:il g ~J//U/l'I~ -(W ~/J-_.~ u-':f?G @ King County DEC-~-2006 01:35 Dec 28 2006 23:31 D. R. STR!Nl Gina Lex -"----· -· ··--·· · 4252354675 p,3 ,' .,.I ) King County Road Services Division Department of Transportation KSC-TR-0222 201 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104-3856 October 22, 2007 Robert H. Stevens, P.E. 14711 NE 29th Place, Suite IOI Bellevue WA 98007 RE: Road Variance L07V0022 -Johnseine Short Plat Dear Mr. Stevens: Thank you for your application for a variance from the 1993 King County Road Standards (KCRS). You requested a variance from Section 2.10 of the KCRS concerning the intersection spacing for the proposed access onto 148th Avenue SE. This road is classified as a collector arterial, and the KCRS requires a minimum of 300 feet of intersection spacing. The proposed location of the site access is 169 feet north of SE I 23rd Street and is supported by the Department of Development and Environmental Services. The access accommodates future development to the west. Moving the access to the north property line is not viable because a 15- foot landscaping tract owned by a homeowner's association obstructs a potential half-street. I approve a variance for reduced intersection spacing for the access road as proposed at 169 feet north of SE I 23rd Street. This decision applies only to KCRS identified in the variance request. All other design requirements in the KCRS and other regulations, such as surface water management and zoning, must still be satisfied for a land use permit application. The applicant retains the rights and privileges afforded by King County Code and adopted Public Rules pertaining to road variance processing (KCC 14.42, PUT 10-2). This variance decision is valid for one year from date of letter unless an associated land use permit is pending or submitted within the one year period. In these cases, the variance decision is valid for the duration of the permit processing. ~ Robert H. Stevens, P.E. October 22, 2007 Page 2 A copy of staff's analysis, findings, and conclusions is enclosed. If you have any questions, please call Craig Comfort, Road ariance Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, at 206-263-6109. Sincerely, ~ c::;z;;]_/. ,h//:tt;1l tp?" /? ft,ic_ Paulette Norman, P.E. County Road Engineer Enclosure cc: James Sanders, P. ., Development Engineer, Land Use Services Division (LUSD), Department of evelopment and Environmental Services (ODES) Pete Dye, P.E., Ser 'or Engineer, LUSD, ODES Linda Dougherty, Division Director, Road Services Division (RSD), Department of I Transportation (pOT) Matthew Nolan, P. ., County Traffic Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT Fatin Kara, P.E., S pervising Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT Kris Langley, Seni r Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT Craig Comfort, P. ., Road Variance Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT @ King County Road Services Division Department of Transportation Traffic Engineering Section MS KSC. TR.0222 201 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104 October 22, 2007 TO: Variance File FM: Craig Comfort, P.E., Road Variance Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section RE: · Road Variance L07V0022 -Johnseine Short Plat Applicant's Presentation: 1. The Johnseine Short Plat is proposed for eight lots on the east side of 148th Avenue SE, to the north of SE 123rd Street. The location at 148th Avenue SE is classified as a collector arterial. The King County Road Standards (KCRS) requires 300 feet of intersection spacing along a collector arterial. The proposed minor access road access street (centerline) will be 169 feet north of the road centerline of SE 123rd Street. 2. An access road must be located on the frontage as there is no alternative. No matter where the access is located, the requisite 300 feet of intersection cannot be met. The proposed new intersection maximizes intersection spacing to future roads to the north and west. The favorable sight distance conditions would allow concurrent left-turners to use the intersections without conflict. Staffs Findings and Conclusions: I. The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) supports the proposed access point. The proposed access allows for future development on the west side of 148th A venue SE. The access cannot be moved to the north property line because there is a narrow IS-foot strip for landscaping purposes that is owned by the Homeowner's Association of the Ellis Park Plat. The strip is in the city of Renton. 2. The entering sight distance and stopping sight distance at the access exceeds KCRS minimums. .. --® King County 1 ), Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 Project Name: Johnseine Short Plat Project Address and Parcel Number: 12204 148th Ave SE; 1123059092, 1123059010 ApplicanVDesign Engineer Name: Robert H. Stevens, P.E. Address: 14711 NE 29th Place, Suite 101 Web Date· 09/28/2005 ROAD ST AND ARDS VARIANCE REQUEST TO THE COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Engineering Firm Name: Core Design, Inc. Telephone: 425-885-7877 Date: C.Ute &.,s/?J , '1,,c, co City, State, ZIP: DDES Engineer Initials: Bellevue, WA 98007 0 Route Application to LUIS 0 Check here if project engineering plans are approved and construction has begun. INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT/DESIGN ENGINEER: Please be sure to include all plans, sketches, photos and maps which may assist in complete review and consideration of your variance request. For a complete list of road variance submittal requirements, refer to separate list from ODES. Failure to provide all pertinent information may result in delayed processing or denial of request. Please submit this reguest and applicable fee to the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) Permit Center at 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219. To make an appointment for permit submittal, please call 206-296-6797. For more information, refer to the ODES Web site, www.metrokc.gov/ddes. I REFER TO SECTION'1.0B'OF THE KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS FOR VARIANCES DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUEST: Intersection centerline offset APPLICABLE SECTION(S) OF STANDARDS: KCRS Section 2.1 OB JUSTIFICATION (see attachments, pages to ----1 2 ): --- AUTHORIZATION SIGNATURES: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AUTHORIZATION D A roval D Conditioned A roval d Denied Date Date Date Check out the ODES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes 06083 Road Variance Request Form le·req.rdvar.pdf 09/28/2005 Page 1 of 1 .. V • ' ' moo~o=J~ ROAD STANDARDS •'® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division VARIANCE REQUEST TO THE COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 . TTY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Project Name: Johnseine Short Plat Project Address and Parcel Number: 12204 148th Ave SE; 1123059092, 1123059010 Applicant/Design Engineer Name: Robert H. Stevens, P.E. Address: 14711 NE 29th Place, Suite 101 ODES File No.: JL Signature: Engineering Firm Name: Core Design, Inc. Telephone: 425-885-7877 City, State, ZIP: DOES Engineer Initials: Bellevue, WA 98007 0 Route Application to LUIS D Check here if project engineering plans are approved and construction has begun. INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT/DESIGN ENGINEER: Please be sure to include all plans, sketches, photos and maps which may assist in complete review and consideration of your variance request. For a complete list of road variance submittal requirements, refer to separate list from DOES. Failure to provide all pertinent information may result in delayed processing or denial of request. Please submit this reguest and applicable fee to the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) Permit Center at 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219. To make an appointment for permit submittal, please call 206-296-6797. For more information, refer to the DOES Web site, www.metrokc.gov/ddes. · REFER.TO SECTION 1.08 OF THE KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS FOR VARIANCES DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUEST: Intersection centerline offset APPLICABLE SECTION(S) OF STANDARDS: KCRS Section 2.1 OB JUSTIFICATION (see attachments, pages _ __.:.1 __ to _::,_2_,): AUTHORIZATION SIGNATURES· DOES STAFF RECOMMENDATION DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AUTHORIZATION D Annroval D Conditioned A""roval D Denied County Design Engineer: Date Development Engineer/Designee: Date County Road Engineer: · Date CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes 06083 Road Variance Request Form le-req-rdvar.pdf 09/28/2005 Page 1 of 1 I . -•• ' ' (t:~[E Core Design, Inc. 14711 N.E. 29th Place, Suite 101 Bellevue, Washington 98007 425.885.7877 Fax425.885.7963 ~DESIGN March 15, 2007 Core No. 06083 King County Department of Transportation Attention: Craig Comfort, P.E. 20 I South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104 www.coredesigninc.com Subject: Johnseine Short Plat Road Variance Request (Related File L,0'1&Jol8) Intersection Spacing Variance KCRS 2.10B Dear Craig, We are pleased to submit a variance request for intersection spacing to the Johnseine Short Plat. The plat is located on the east side 148 1h Ave SE, north of SE I 23rd Street (north entrance to Shamrock Heights.) The short plat application consists of8 lots and I future development tract. A preliminary site plan is included. Intersection Centerline Offset Variance Existing Conditions Summary and Design Standards The proposed entrance road to the subject plat will create an intersection off l 48'h Avenue SE, which is classified as a collector arterial. The new road is classified as a minor access street and terminates with a cul-de-sac. The road centerline of the proposed site access is located approximately 169 feet north of the road centerline of SE 123rd Street. KCRS section 2.IOB requires that intersections shall be offset 300 feet when the highest classification of road is a collector arterial. Justification The northern property line of the subject site, which is 292 feet north of the 148 1h Avenue SE and SE l 23'd Street intersection, still falls short of the 300-foot offset. Locating the proposed site access 169 feet north of the SE 123'ct Street intersection maximizes spacing to future intersections that may be proposed for development north of the subject site or directly west creating a direct alignment if those parcels should develop. The favorable sight distance conditions would allow concurrent NB/SB left-tum movements to use the intersection without conflict. The low traffic volumes of 77 A.D.T. generated by this short plat would also help mitigate the proposed offset. ~ ~©~OW~ I[)' 1L07V0022 MAR 162007 l_l::) N :\2006\06083\Docs\06083 _ RoadVarianceRequcst.tloc ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYING K.C. D.D.E.S. .i ' ' ' Conclusions In summary, we request approval of the Intersection Centerline Offset variance described above. We feel that the proposed off set propose between the site access and opposing SE 123rd Street will not create a hazard to public safety. The intersection offset is not expected to negatively impact intersection operations or any future intersections planned along 1481h Ave SE. We appreciate your review of the included materials. Please feel free to call me with any questions at (425) 885-7877. Sincerely, CORE DESIGN, INC. Robert H. Stevens P.E. Principal/Senior Engineer cc: Robert Johnseine Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan ! £XPIRES 12-04-()~ I I I I ~I II • ~ 51 < fA ,,CYJT16 NOl!JNlllS 66,,L 31.IIIS ':ts :,77 'H.L It'd .L 17"Sl7"37d A.LH3d0Hd3N/3SNHOr .ltrld AlllfNIW/73/ld JDH:llO I tw..,.110 ,-.. N3J,D V'f'IC/l'I OlN!JIS]O i '1 ~ LOOZ Alh'flH83:J :llVO i '--------------------'--------------------1) ~- ~ l§@l§DWllifo\ MAR 16 2007 ~ K.C. 0.0.E.S. ' ' Ave SE looking north along project frontage Eastside of 148m Ave SE looking south along project frontage , SE 123rd Street located on far right of thi s photo Johnseine Short Plat I ~ ----------- Westside of 148m Ave SE & SE 123ra Street, looking toward project project frontage Looking north from intersection of SE 123ra Street ' L07V0022 ~ CORE ~DESIGN fo) ~©~OW~'[)' !Ju MAR 1 6 2007 ~ K.C. 0.0.E.S Q) C\I C: C\I ·-o Q) 0 ~> ..c: ,..._ 00 , ....J ~----.l / ... ~ I ~ ------1 I I I ------1 / --I I ' I I I 1 i /_ __ ~--- ,/ / ( _/ .. _/ 1------Jf!,' .. King County Road Services Division Department of Transportation KSC·TR-0222 201 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104-3856 June 12, 2007 Robert H. Stevens, P.E. 14711 NE 29th Place, Suite 10 I Bellevue, WA 98007 RE: Road Variance L07V0022 -Johnseine Short Plat Dear Mr. Stevens: Thank you for your application for a variance from the King County Road Standards (KCRS). You requested a variance from Section 2.10 of the KCRS concerning the intersection spacing for the proposed access onto 148th Avenue SE. This road is classified as a collector arterial for which the KCRS requires a minimum of300 feet of intersection spacing. We reviewed your proposal and determined clear direction from the permitting agency, the Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES), is necessary for the proper location of your plat access. Other considerations, beyond intersection spacing, are necessary in the determination of plat access. For your project, these considerations include locating the connection to accommodate future access to the parcel to the west, and to provide adequate intersection spacing to luture road connections to the north. The reviewing agency must also evaluate the efficient use of the arterial roadway system to promote safe and functional future road connections. A variance consideration on intersection spacing is premature without sufficient land use planning input. 1 suggest you consult with ODES on the proper location of the intersection. Your variance is put on hold until these decisions are made. lfyou have any questions concerning this correspondence, please call me at 206-263-6109. s_~~cerely, .. _ .... ) 1 r I ·'/ lrJ_ (_~~ (_,,.,,~u,¥ , Craig ?amforf;'/P.E. Road Variance Engineer @·ti!&'>•w2" Robert H. Stevens, P. · June 12, 2007 Page 2 cc: James Sanders, P.E., Development Engineer, Land Use Services Division (LUSD), Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) Pete Dye P.E., Senior Engineer, LUSD, ODES Kim Claussen, Senior Planner, LUSD, ODES Paulette Norman, County Road Engineer, Road Services Division (RSD), Department of Transportation (DOT) Matthew Nolan, P.E., County Traffic Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT Falin Kara, P.E., Supervising Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT Kris Langley, Senior Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, RSD, DOT D e, Pete From: Sent: To: Subject: Langley, Kristen Friday, April 20, 2007 1 :26 PM Dye, Pete; Simmons, Pat; Claussen, Kimberly RE: Johnseine Short Plat-· L07S0018 The critical area creates a significant issue to subdivision of the properties to the north of that 'panhandle' of Renton jurisdiction. We had a pre-app for them, and the only realistic access is off of Pasco Place NE, so there's a huge question as to the ability to get the remainder of the right-of-way --even if there weren't the jurisdictional issue. The properties on the west side of 148th. The northerly one was provided an access via a tract in the plat of Shamrock. The second one probably has limited subdivision potential. Only the third one, located across from the general location of the proposed plat entrance, appears to have some realistic subdivision potential and hasn't already been provided for with access into the northern portion of Shamrock · From: Sent: To: Subject: Dye, Pete Friday, April 20, 2007 1:17 PM Langley, Kristen; Simmons, Pat; Claussen, Kimberly Johnseine Short Plat --L0750018 The road variance committee needs some input and recommendations regarding the best location for property access. The applicant is requesting approval for a road entry at the center of the property which does not align properly for future development on the west side of 148th and does not meet the minimum intersection spacing of 300 feet. A half street along the north property line would provide the best intersection spacing, however an odd strip of land north of the site is owned by City of Renton. Where is the best location for site access based upon potential future access for all adjacent parcels? « OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)» 1 • 0 8 r c.... oo ....... ~ < ::J o en 0 Cll. N ::J "' Cl) ,':, _____ 11· 1.50JH 'i ·~-== I I i l._. ___ _ .... -----1~1- i r-,- r'-oo -...J ::r <::, 0 (/) 0 <1>. "' ::, "' (1) +· Comfort, Craig From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Hi Craig, Foster, Curt Tuesday, September 18, 2007 4:23 PM Comfort, Craig Tibbits, Chad; Simmons, Pat L07V0022-Johnseine SP-Intersection Spacing Issue This morning at a meeting with the applicant and staff from Core Design you requested a statement from us (DOES) in regards to our position concerning the proposed access. The following is our conclusion/position: The proposed access appears to accommodate the future subdivision for the property on the opposite side of 148th Street. The other option considered was an access at the north boundary (subject property). However, the (off-site) 12- foot wide(+/-) City of Renton landscape strip conflicts with a future road located on the common boundary with the adjacent property. Please call me if you have further questions. Thank you for your time, Curt(@ 6-7106) Curt Foster, P. E. Engineer Ill King County, DOES, LUSD 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Office: 206.296.7106, Fax: 206.296.6613 Email: cur).tosteI@kin_gcwn_ty,gQV Please note my new e-mail address. September , 2007 Robert H. Stevens, P.E. 14711 NE 29th Place, Suite IOI Bellevue WA, 98007 RE: Road Variance L07V0022 -Johnseine Short Pia Dear Mr. Stevens: Thank you for your application for a variance from ti ing County Road Standards (KCRS). (f11f. You requested a variance from Section 2.10 of the KCRS concerning the intersection spacing \s s; for the proposed access onto 148th Avenue SE. This road is classified as a collector aie~a].»O:.;",J/1,~.,. and the KCRS requires a minimum of 300 feet of intersection spacing. ~~•It P~ The proposed location of the site access is 169 feet north of SE 123rd Strcc~is supported by the Department of Development and Environmental Services. The accessQ.s:commodate~ future development to the west. Moving the access to the north property line is not a viable . because a 15 foot landscaping tract owned by a homcowner's association obstructs a potential half street. I approve a variance for reduced intersection spacing for the access road as proposed at 169 feet no1ih of SE I 23rd Street. l/ This decision applies only to King County Road Standards identified in the variance request. All other design requirements in the KCRS and other regulations, such as surface water management and zoning, must still be satisfied for a land use pennit application. The applicant retains the rights and privileges afforded by King County Code and adopted Public Rules pertaining to road variance processing (KCC 14.42, PUT I 0-2). This variance decision is valid for one year from date of letter unless an associated land use permit is pending or submitted within the one year period. In these cases, the variance decision is valid for the duration of the permit processing. A copy of staff's analysis, findings, and conclusions is enclosed. If you have any questions, please call Craig Comfort, Road Variance Engineer, Traffic Engineering Section, at 206-263-6109. Sincerely, Paulette Norman, P.E. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. PermltNumber:~~1<2: . _ ActlvltyNumber:\ ffi\/~ PermltName: -~C\ ~\,t:R}, 2Vst . \ FOR INDIVIDUALS: I, ________________ _ (print name). hereby certify that I am the/an owner of the property which is the subject of this permit. If I am not the sole owner of the property, I certify that I am authorized to represent all other owners of the property. My mailing address is: I further certify that I am the "Applicant" for this permit and as such am financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. I shall remain the "Applicant" for the duration of this permit unless I transfer my "applicant" status in writing on a form provided by ODES. * Signature of Applicant -OR- FOR CORPORATIONS/BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS: I,-------------------- Date Signed (print name), hereby certify that I am · an authorized agent of , a corporation or other business association authorized to do business in the State of Washington, which is the sole . owner of the property that is the subject of this permit. If this corporation or business association is not the sole owner of the property, I certify that this corporation/business association is authorized to represent all other owners of the property. The mailing address of this corporation/business association is: I further certify that the above named corporation/business association is the "Applicant" for this permit and as such is financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. This corporation/business association shall remain the "Applicant" for the duration of this permit unless it transfers its applicant status in writing on a form provided by ODES. * Signature of Applicant's Agent Date Signed * By signing as the Applicant or the Applicant's Agent, I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the information provided above is true and correct. Certification of Applicant StatusFORM lc-cer-apstat.pdf 01/08104 Page 1of 2 \ II I I I I~ II I I I I H---_L T __L_-j I II I I i---- 11 I I I · II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L_ r---- 1 I I Haidar, Mazen From: Haidar, Mazen Sent: To: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 2:19 PM Claussen, Kimberly · Cc: Dye, Pete Subject: RE: L07S0018/L08Ml075 -Pleasant Path short plat Attachments: Picture (Metafile) Kim, I read your draft letter and I have no issues or concerns, once we receive the revised plans submittal from the: engineer I will review the access layout to the stormwater vault through the recreation tract and I will let'you know if there will be a need for revised recreation plans, again thank you for your help and please let me know should you have any questions. ~ King County Mazen Haldar, P.E. Engineer II Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 mazen.haidar@kinqcounty.gov P 206. 296. 7133 F 206. 296. 6613 From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Claussen, Kimberly Tuesday, January 06, 2009 I :49 PM Haldar, Mazen Dye, Pete L0750018/LOBMI075 -Pleasant Path short plat Attached is a draft letter associated with the recreation/landscape plan. Please let me know if you have any issues, concerns, etc. by Thurs 12/8 -noon. I'll also drop off a plan. Thanks « File: 108mi075appvl.doc » 1 lQ King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Engineering Review Comments Project Type: 8 Lots ShorfRlat Review Date: 10/13/2008 Reviewe~f~T,Mazen Haidijr}_P.E Project Name : Pleasant Path . . Review No. : 1 s Email : . . mazen.haidal'@kingc:ouiitV;q6v projElct Number : L07SOQ18 ~hohe :: (206) 296 ~ 7133i ··· Acti'(ity Number : L08SR020. Fax/ h' {206) 206 ° 69.13'' .. - Reference Sheet 1 Sheet 5 Sub Item I item 1 1 2 3 4 5 DocumJJFI Refererice.1 ccS--~C ~-c.'·::···ss-·--- Review . .Corriments · Please show the USPS approval stamp and si.9.nature for mailboxes location For the proposed on-site access road, please revise plans to show centerline of road same as center line of road ROW Per approved road variance L07V0022 conditions please verify that a minimum 169-feet separation is maintained between centerline of on-site access road/ROW and center line of SE 123"' Street. Also, olease show the name of SE 123"' Street on plans Please clarify / label whether spot elevation around the Cul-De-Sac (CDS) as shown are at fiow the line or at the top of the curb Please label the classification of 14s1° Ave. NE as Urban Collector Arterial Please revise the pavement taper at the north terminus of the frontage road improvements to a speed limit to 1 as required for Arterial roadways Page 1 of 7 Co~;tilta;i~11sponse date · 't}> '-i "'Cciinplete I • T • , .... ,.. ..... . . ~a~t · (Y/N) tQ King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Sub• Document Reference Item I .. ifreln .. Reference .. ; .,,r:,·. .::··, 6 7 8 Sheet 6 1 2 Sheet 7 1 2 ..•. :· s ,··... . i/·, ,, ..... . '. ' .,. '.,, ..... ·:,,.,, ...... .. .consultant:Response'date, Complete .·:: ,:I~~y1eVJ.Commenbl:/: : ; ... ,· {,·.···•• ·Name: ·:.·• .. } .. ,:,···.;\];1:;;;:;:;::iii•::•·••· ... • .· ........ ' ) ., ) ... ,. ('r'IN) ··.,<··./. Please curb cut at the intersection of proposed Private Access Tract and the on-site access road Please revise ODES Approval Block as shown in red as show on all plan sheets except the standard cover sheet . Please add ADA ramp on the west side of 148"' across the street from the subject short plat Please show the existing fog line in 148'" on plans in plan views and in road section, and show saw cut line at the foa line Please replace the pavement overly note with the following note: Per the 2007 KCRS Section 4.03, a 1.5 inch full width overlay shall be required. Appropriate repairs to the existing subgrade, base material, surfacing and pre-level may be required prior to placing the overlay. The overlay may be waived only upon written request and after an evaluation of pavement conditions and/or channelization requirements has been completed and approved by the County Road Enaineer or Develooment Engineer. Please remove the proposed water and sewer improvements from the plan and profile views. Please add a table on the plan for the individual lots storm stub-outs showing the its stations, stations offset, invert elevation, rim elevation and pioe size Page 2 of 7 tQ . King County Deparbnent of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov .·· .. .• Sub Document. /. ·· .. i\ ... · •. _... ... .. . c:;ri~ult.ii,Tk~sponse date ·.· : ;:;.• .. . Complete Reference-.Item Review Comments . .. .. . · .. ·. . · Item Reference, •. ···•··· , [ ,~j~e : ~1";~!;" ~"1,ct _·; ~", (YIN) 3 Please revise the proposed storm pipes layouts at the intersection of the on-site access with 148th as show on plan. This should minimize the amount of uncontrolled flows entering KC ROW and should maximize the amount of flows generated in 148th to be routed to the orooosed RID Vault 4 Please label Tract "A" as Landscape Tract encumbering a public drainage easement to King Countv for the orooosed RID facilitv 5 In profile design views, please clearly where existing grade and proposed grade are taken at, such road centerline, flow line, or center of nine. 6 In profile design views please show the followings: a. New flow line profile for improvements in 148th b. Property line station, ROW stations, tract stations, and lot lines stations c. New/ ex. ditch flow line for improvements in 148th · d. CB stations and stations offset e. CB tvnes Sh t 8 1 Please revise the vault bottom per the 2005 King ee County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), fiaure 6.4.2A, oaae 6-88 2 Show 5' X 10' openings for equipments access with hinged man access in vault details, and make sure the total access openings area is at least 4% of the total vault bottom area Page 3 of 7 ~ King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Reference TIR General Sub Item J . Jtem 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 1 2 3 Document'F Reference ,_ ---- ,Review Comrnents;> Show footing drains line for the vault in the vault details and show the downstream discharge point location for the drain line Please clearly label the control structure location on p_lans Maintenance access should be provided to all 9_rates opening in the proposed vault Drainage Easement shall be shown within proposed Tract A and B Please include the maintenance access to the vault in the areas calculations and revise as needed Please submit reduced peak-flow calculations for the pre and developed conditions, and either show 2-yr + 10-yr + Duration matching or 25-yr + Duration matching. Please revise all calculations as needed. Please submit Bond Quantities Calculations in TIR Please provide Horizontal Control Plan with complete information Please submit pavement design calculations for the proposed pavement widening in 148th based on actual field soils conditions Please provide 3 sets of structural plans for the p_roposed RID vault wit_h design calculations Page 4 of 7 Consultant Resp;;~;~ date-Complete .i' I Name: (YIN) I tQ King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Sub Document ··. Reference Item Item Reference· -· . 4 5 6 7 . .. .... C :,·" ---::-,.--_ . .-"·:_· -Consultant Response date· .. , .. I I Complete . Review Corn111:nt;iI .. -: ; __ .. . . 2· Name:. J C - .. .·· . (Y/N)' .. · ---~ . "-- Please submit 10 copies of Landscape Plans under separate Land Use Miscellaneous application, and make sure street trees are not part of the Landscape Plans. Street trees shall be on a separate plans and exnlained above Please submit 5 sets of Separate Significant Trees Plans Please submit 4 sets Illumination plans for improvements in 148th Please submit 4 sets channelization plans for improvements in 148th Page 5 of 7 ti King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton. WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Reference I Item Sub I Document Item-I Reference -. .. -- 8 9 cRe~iew Comments Please show the following drainage BMP on the plans: I. The final short plat shall include the recording of applicable documents for implementation of storm water BMP's as described in Appendix C of the King Cowty drainage manual for permeable pavement, Page C6 l-64. A declaration of covenant and grant of easement with the required text of instructions shall be recorded to address the drainage designs as shown on the engineering plans. 2. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded short plat: "Single family residences and other improvements constructed on the lots created by this subdivision must implement the flow control best management practices stipulated in the drainage plan declaration of covenants and grant of easement recorded for each bt. Compliance with this stipulation must be addressed in the small project drainage plan submitted for drainage· review when application is made for a single family residential building permit for the lot." Please be informed that Constructability Review is pending for the subject project and full compliance with review comments (if any) is required for the roval Page 6 of 7 ctn~ultant Response Complete< (Y/N) tQ King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055,5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov .Referentl~i Item Sub I Dc,cumettt~ Item I Refer~nce 10 11 ·Review Ccffil"meri~i11 ,. <., >""', ,c·····-' Please refer to plans and TIR redline markups and revise accordingly Please submit 4 copies of revised Civil Plans Set and TIR with all County redline markups and a list of responses to this list of comments Page 7 of 7 Cons.ultaiit Rl!_~poiisedl!te . • ,:;--':,';~,--':,_.·:·. • ·.::c--:eaa.-s:c.o--" .. • . -,- Name:: ti~~~Pll!te_•_ ,~~1.N1if·· ~ King County · Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Engineering Review Comments Proj~tTYP.!liif~?ts Stio~. P,l~t.~ :;!]:1!.'~i}'h':"•t ~~viejN, !;)ate:,o~t~§!.29.0l!!t. Pro·;~t"Niril~r,:e1easaritPath·snartif:>1afl\;l?'l:; · 1 1.···, ~t~· · Review3Nol:::2r:,c1tt;\· ·. · ·<·-· ~ ' .. ,::12r~::~;llt':'" "'H"·\#,· _·. • • • ,.\'_· ,·· .,_·~Y~; .. ~; :~::•'.:~1.~·:~:;·~~,-~~ -~-·.'." '\~~~--~::~ ;;;~:·.~,-·::\~···;::,..-,-.: _ Pro1ectNumber-:cL:.07S0018·. , .. .,,, .. ''.~r·· .r.L;.;·-,,~: ·.· -~, · .. ,, .. ,,., ··.,,.·. •1,.,. ·· ._(•·: <·:{0~t)s'l~~,~-. ,·; .·-, / -.· .•~1~:• L·,~.;~;::<·~t~:~;~~-~--:-~-?~·'. .. _, .. '., , •~t'-'"'_ /'.;;:.~.;·;<~~:'>. Act1v1ty,.Number;:,L!08SR02P., . ii., ,··r.,,::>,.&:,! ;~'. · ,>;,• · .7,.,. ·,Fax: (206). 296 f,§613:-. ~.-··''" ,: .P-.v;..,.. •,:i:<~7 i'.~~;.f>'l'. · __ _., ,•' •C. ,",· •• ;,• c,•'1'.)!. --., • "-"""-!O.'-~AJ~.-,, .• l,,·~ :a ·_,,. ;.,,., ,·' ·'-wrC.:',·•· _, . .,.~,..., ,._,,,.,r:, .. ~ ,-'• ~ '-,; ~ii~;;;t{; ·sub, Document : :,J?.::;t{it~1:~f3t;~"~~ a~~;C,~<!~/it:~;~c; .. J .. '}; .1iern1 tReferen?~: Sheet 5 1 Please revise the DOES Approval Block as shown in red on all plan sheets except the standard cover sheet Sheet 7 1 In plan views please label Tract "A" as landscape tract encumbering a public drainage easement dedicated to King Countv for the RID facilities Sheet 8 1 In the vault section details please show 5' X 10' openings for equipments access with hinged man access in the RID section of vault, and please make sure the vault structural plans are revised to reflect this chance as well 2 Please clearlv label the control structure location on olans 3 Drainage Easement shall be shown within proposed Tracts A and B General 1 The submitted Geotechnical Report contains pavement section recommendation and it does not contain pavement design calculations, please submit three sets of these calculations for County review and approval as soon as nossible. 2 Please be informed that channalization and street lights plans review is pending for the subject project and full compliance with review comments (if any) is required for the engineering review annroval 3 Please be informed that Constructability Review is pending for the subject project and full compliance with review comments (if any) is required for the engineering review approval 4 Please refer to plans redline markups and revise accordingly 5 Please submit 3 copies of revised Civil Plans, revised vault Structural plans, and all County redline markups with list of responses to this list of comments "':{ .. " .' 1;·, .t.: . Revie'ller'.Na_riie·: Mazen Haidar,,P.E:. <:;·.,.,, ? "'\'.: ... ' . ' . '".~:;:,.· ,:.~-~~ii::= rn~z;n: ti~~af«'Al<!~§cou.~tx:eo~·,;,: :<. , . ·, f, ,.Phg!le :,.(?06) 296-7.1}3 · ' '''?c;·-:·~ ';' :, P~ci]e'bf'.'Man~g~r,:·Peter Dye; P:E. · ,., '" · .. ~ ' .. -. ·'-·-.. ' , .•... Consultant,Respoiise Dati,:'' . -. -. . . ' ~· c:~.n:ieJ,~~;1 Ni,\i'e:-o.,;;{ ,,j,,:{;::·,;:.'. _ ·,; :: ... -,-_,. .· • .. -·: :..-· ", ··,·::{::, : ~ ' ,, '.·:,IY/N\':: . ' ' tQ King County · Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Engineering Review Comments ·:erojecf!;J;ype'ilt8t:ots Sh'ort Piaf>, :?i''.\:-'tft.'@.~f.:>~e' -.Review-:Clate: 02/25/2009'"'' . . . rr9i.ftl".~l.~rti,~i§in1·.·~;\h·s:~;#1;;¥:~;~§:it:/;,:?~~H~~¥i~~11~i!-~r·:· Reviei.vedilame·. :.Mazen 'Haidar,,P. E,;,,,;,~ .. ·.·.· :~~ 3f~:··:;~~*'~tl»'.;m!ien'ff~L~~;@~]ndc~~ty:;.~! '~: .. : , , Proiect,Number./'1107S0018.;: -· ,,, ··"'-"'"'·\)'\v5iiJ.c :.;··"":· ·. -~';;;:>:· FY ·"·c,:.?"'.', :.,.1-. ·.·1,.-··;t,,·:"' .. ,, . .' ::, ·.--')';;-~~, .,; rd~~-;;-:.:....-. .. .-t,:'-·-'. ,.:·,. ~·:> -· :· .. -;:. ·,:~/;'.,h~?;1,*}~fu;$1': J,j':J;f~--'0,1"'.. -;-: .. ''-\~;,.. ., · · ·.::tF,,/, --:":th~·. :,~.v:_,,:,.:',<V.1-.; ActivitykNilffiberl:L":08SR020 .. ·;::-;;r"'';;:;.;,·:· ·IW"''· .<:F · }:1':' ':Fa,C'(206f296fc'.66:13' · ;,o,• .• , .A_~_:;;,~,! ;::,:~<_i'_~.' ;''ff","'"',~ ,, •', ,.-;:_:_. ·,,-•.,_._.,~: ·• ~Ot,t~:I '-,:~~~~~-· ;/,;._~~ ;;<.":.J>(.,.l:,_ ·,' ,-'S\~-..:...)'.g4' __ -"*;.-W*·4}"}4\. 1 '!,",,i:1: ~;j-~~~-:::;;1:::)~ ~\!~J, ,Document · ' : ,:: :, ?RevieWICommerits a·11d: Cotle Reference , '/ ·,Y, . iltem1 iRefereni:'e ~ -;, ).t~r;:~t1~J1t\~~1?Jt~-:.)1t( -,_ -. ~ti_:·:::;_· : ·:\i~) ·. ·-.· ;,:::1 -~;: · ;~~:ff :./: ;_ Sheet 5 1 Please revise the DOES Approval Block as shown in red on all plan sheets except the standard cover sheet Sheet 7 1 In plan views please label Tract "A" as landscape tract encumbering a public drainage easement dedicated to King Countv for the RID facilities Sheet 8 1 In the vault section details please show 5' X 10' openings for equipments access with hinged man access in the R/D section of vault, and please make sure the vault structural plans are revised to reflect this chanae as well 2 Please clearlv label the control structure location on plans 3 Drainage Easement shall be shown within proposed Tracts A and B General 1 The submitted Geotechnical Report contains pavement section recommendation and it does not contain pavement design calculations, please submit three sets of these calculations for County review and approval as soon as oossible. 2 Please be informed that channalization and street lights plans review is pending for the subject project and full compliance with review comments (if any) is required for the engineering review annroval 3 Please be informed that Constructability Review is pending for the subject project and full compliance with review comments (if any) is required for the engineering review approval 4 Please refer to plans redline markups and revise accordingly 5 Please submit 3 copies of revised Civil Plans, revised vault Structural plans, and all County redline markups with list of resoonses to this list of comments .,.. . . .. ,~.;;;;Rhone .. (206) 296. 7J 33-'· . ·i< ·':t· .:, · .' ·,·:·:~-\fi~_,,.r;'\(,~t,:*1~·.·-<·' '-'::. -~-·-:---~· '~'"-~. , .... : . ."'~'"'-·.:;~'..~ . __ --. :\ :.,: Proiect Manager,:,Peter,.Die;. P,E~.-· · ... : f.i1,-,. :::, . ,->'. '-~-t y,.. ...... ..; .. ~.~--.cC''· ·g-. ·-., .. ,_. ~ -~-:'. ' ..... _ ••.•.. --~; ~11~,t~~;~~e~~~~;'!.~~t~=:" ·.·. .. ' ~ " . : c;:,?/Tl~l.et!!(; ; ·-. "'' ~-~ : .,.IY/NI ' . King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www .kingcounty.qov January 8, 2009 Josh Beard, LA Core Design 14711 Northeast 29th Pl, Suite 101 Bellevue WA 98007 RE: Pleasant Path Short Plat {ODES File No. L07S0018) Recreation Space Plan Activity No. L08MI075 Dear Mr. Beard: This is in response to your December 31, 2008 request for approval of the landscape and recreation space plan for the Pleasant Path short plat. We have reviewed your submittal, and with the following conditions and additions, approve it as submitted: 1. The equipment (structures, benches, picnic table, etc.) shall meet at a minimum, Consumer Product Safety Standards and be appropriately anchored. 2. Walkways/Trails shall be installed from the sidewalk to the play areas. Walkways shall be constructed of a material and grade that is Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible. 3. The fence along the perimeter of the tract shall be backed by either chain link or low plantings to alleviate any potential conflicts between users of the recreation space and vehicles (i.e. balls rolling into street, etc.). 4. The grass-crete or other alternatives for access to. the stormwater facility must be approved with the engineering plans. If this surface is not approved, a revised recreation plan will be required. In the event a solid surface (i.e. asphalt, concrete, or similar) is required for the drainage facility a revised plat layout may be required, as the access to the drainage facility and associated appurtenances are not counted toward the recreation space requirement. 5. In the event the engineering plans, soil amendment, street tree and/or significant tree plans result in modification/revisions to the recreation space plan, a revised recreation plan will be required. The landscaping and recreation space improvements (i.e. play structures) must be installed and inspected or a performance bond posted, prior to plat recording. The amount of the bond'has been established at $40,000. This includes landscaping, equipment, surfacing materials, fencing, etc. The bond amount includes a thirty- percent contingency, as well as the requirement for the wood fence to be backed with chain link or additional shrubbery/low plantings along the fence. Note, this approval does not include soil amendment plan, street trees or significant trees. This will be reviewed in conjunction with the engineering plans. An inspection fee is also due prior to recording. This fee covers the cost of an installation inspection and a maintenance inspection. The amount of the inspection deposit will be determined by the Land Use Inspection Section (LUIS). If a performance financial guarantee is posted, the improvements must be installed within two year's from the date of recording. At the time of inspection by the Land Use Inspection Section, if the improvements are fully installed per the approved plan, the performance financial guarantee may be reduced. Enclosed is a copy of the approved plans for your records. If you have any questions, please call me at (206) 296-7167. If you have questions regarding the financial guarantee please contact Carol Rogers, Finance Section at (206) 296-7250. Questions regarding the inspection process may be directed to the Land Use Inspection Section (206) 296-6642. Sincerely, Kim Claussen, PPM Ill Current Planning Section Cc: Pete Dye, Engineering Review Section w/enc Ray Floren!, Engineering Review Section w/enc Steve Townsend, Development Inspection Section w/enc FGMU w/bond quantity worksheet File w/enc ~ King County · Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Engineering Review Comments Project Type : 8 Lots Short Plat Project Name : Pleasant Path Short Plat Project Number: L07S0018 Review Date: 02/25/2009 Review No.: 2nd -.,..,..,,..,..,.,..-----------------,.,-------Activity Number: L08SR020 Fax: (206) 296-6613 Sub Document Review Comments and Code Reference Item Item Reference Sheet 5 1 Please revise the DDES Approval Block as shown in red on all plan sheets except the standard cover sheet Sheet 7 1 In plan views please label Tract "A" as landscape tract encumbering a public drainage easement dedicated to King Countv for the RID facilities Sheet 8 1 In the vault section details please show 5' X 1 O' openings for equipments access with hinged man access in the RID section of vault, and please make sure the vault structural plans are revised to reflect this chance as well 2 Please clearly label the control structure location on clans 3 Drainage Easement shall be shown within proposed Tracts A and B General 1 The submitted Geotechnical Report contains pavement section recommendation and it does not contain pavement design calculations, please submit three sets of these calculations for County review and approval as soon as possible. 2 Please be informed that channalization and street lights plans review is pending for the subject project and full compliance with review comments (if any) is required for the engineering review aooroval 3 Please be informed that Constructability Review is pending for the subject project and full compliance with review comments (if any) is required for the engineering review approval 4 Please refer to plans redline markups and revise accordingly 5 Please submit 3 copies of revised Civil Plans, revised vault Structural plans, and all County redline markups with list of responses to this list of comments Reviewer Name: Mazen Haidar, P.E. Email : mazen.haidar@kinqcounty.gov Phone : (206) 296-7133 Project Manager: Peter Dye, P.E. Consultant Response Date: Complete Name: IY/Nl ,r ti King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www .metrokc.gov Engineering Review Comments Project Type : 8 Lots Sho'rt-PLat Revi~viDate : · . 10/13/2008 j ReVi.ewer: Ma_ zen Hajdar; P.t . . . . Project Name : Project Number: :~~~;;~fath . Revi~~~~~---= 1 51 .1~~:~~::·,-I>:C~6~~~·;:i~ii~jir19~~~~~.qov Activity Nurnber : ---------L08SR020 Fax:_ ·. (206) 206-6613·'< •.. -,. 1,· .::,;.,, :· ' _-. .. , ·> · · Ii ·''•• ' .''•)t .. ,. ''.,, _... . . ~ •• ,'':'. Sub Document -.· I ConsultantResponse date .. •. 1 •complete Reference Item Review Comments .... ····· .· ·.' ··.··· .. . i <i,_ •i} .·.,... .. Item Reference -.>,-. ,Name-: ·· -•-----. . -i C \,, (Y/N) -:··:; -_.,_.'.--·-... ,-.. -·-:~:c"':_~_:_" -·) __ --: __ ,· : . - Sheet 1 1 Please show the USPS approval stamp and signature for mailboxes location Sheet 5 1 For the proposed on-site access road, please revise plans to show centerline of road same as center line of road ROW 2 Per approved road variance L07V0022 conditions please verify that a minimum 169-feet separation is maintained between centerline of on-site access road/ROW and center line of SE 123"' Street. Also, please show the name of SE 123'' Street on clans 3 Please clarify / label whether spot elevation around the Cul-De-Sac (CDS) as shown are at flow the line or at the too of the curb 4 Please label the classification of 148'" Ave. NE as Urban Collector Arterial 5 Please revise the pavement taper at the north terminus of the frontage road improvements to a speed limit to 1 as reauired for Arterial roadwavs Page 1 of 7 • tQ King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Reference ,, Sheet 6 Sheet 7 Sub ltem'j ·, ,. item 6 7 8 2 2 Document Reference ·, Review Comments· Please curb cut at the intersection of proposed Private Access Tract and the on-site access road Please revise DOES Approval Block as shown in red as show on all plan sheets except the standard cover sheet Please add ADA ramp on the west side of 148"' across the street from the subject short pla_t~_ Please show the existing fog line in 148m on plans in plan views and in road section, and show saw cut line at the fog line Please replace the pavement overly note with the following note: · Per the 2007 KCRS Section 4.03, a 1.5 inch full width overlay shall be required. Appropriate repairs to the existing subgrade, base material, surfacing and pre-level may be required prior to placing the overlay. The overlay may be waived only upon written request and after an evaluation of pavement conditions and/or channelization requirements has been completed and approved by the County Road Engineer or Development Engineer. Please remove the proposed water and sewer improvements from the plan and profile views. Please add a table on the plan for the individual lots storm stub-outs showing the its stations, stations offset, invert elevation, rim elevation and pipe size_ Page 2 of 7 ConsultantRes-11on'$;sdat~r~- •",: Compleie ('t'IN)i:' ::.·-;::,.,"";;'·' • tQ King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov ... .· ,. ,_. ___ · .. Document Sub Reference lt~m Item .' .... :·· . -,·; Reference _c_ .. 3 4 5 6 Sheet 8 1 2 " : . ,; ·:: i::ti~•"""aw ;,i ··. ··' ' ... Complete .,· 'i .• Review C.ommehts i, ... ;, (YIN) ·········· .:\ .. -. )/;:::::·_·.: . ·-., ,.:· . . . . Please revise the proposed storm pipes layouts at the intersection of the on-site access with 148th as show on plan. This should minimize the amount of uncontrolled flows entering KC ROW and should maximize the amount of flows generated in 148th to be routed to the orooosed RID Vault Please label Tract "A" as Landscape Tract encumbering a public drainage easement to King Countv for the orooosed RID facilitv In profile design views, please clearly where existing grade and proposed grade are taken at, such road centerline, flow line, or center of oioe. In profile design views please show the followings: a. New flow line profile for improvements in 148th b. Property line station, ROW stations, tract stations, and lot lines stations C. New I ex. ditch flow line for improvements in 148th d. CB stations and stations offset e. CB tvnes Please revise the vault bottom per the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), fiaure 6.4.2A, oaae 6-88 Show 5' X 1 O' openings for equipments access with hinged man access in vault details, and make sure the total access openings area is at least 4% of the total vault bottom area Page 3 of 7 ' t'1 King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Reference [item f-§ub ·1Jtem ::::::: 1~£'~t R&VI~ Comnieri&,ce · ::,:rao,.,;,i,•fdi<o 3 4 5 6 TIR 1 2 3 General 1 2 3 Show footing drains line for the vault in the vault details and show the downstream discharge point location for the drain line --- Please clearly label the control structure location on _l)fans Maintenance access should be provided to all grates opening in the proposed vault Drainage Easement shall be shown within proposed Tract A and B Please include the maintenance access to the vault in the areas calculations and revise as needed Please submit reduced peak-flow calculations for the pre and developed conditions, and either show 2-yr + 10-yr + Duration matching or 25-yr + Duration matching. Please revise all calculations as needed. Please submit Bond Quantities Calculations in TIR Please provide Horizontal Control Plan with complete information Please submit pavement design calculations for the proposed pavement widening in 1481 " based on actual field soils conditions Please provide 3 sets of structural plans for the proposed R/D vault with design calculations Page 4 of 7 cqrriplete . -(Y_/N)i • . , I ., ~ King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296· 7217 www.metrokc.gov - , ,-· I Sub Document I Reference J 1tem ,r I Item Reference -1 - 4 5 6 7 -. ,:." Review Commen~ ,s- Please submit 10 copies of Landscape Plans under separate Land Use Miscellaneous application, and make sure street trees are not part of the Landscape Plans. Street trees shall be on a separate plans and explained above Please submit 5 sets of Separate Significant Trees Plans Please submit 4 sets Illumination plans for imp_rovements in 148'" Please submit 4 sets channelization plans for imp_rovements in 148'" Page 5 of 7 - Consu_ltant ReSp!)nSedate-· I Complet~' I Name·,·: -f~ Y("'./N) -- tQ King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov , Sub,\Document Reference Item Item I ~eference 8 9 - •Review Comments Please show the following drainage BMP on the plans: I. The final short plat shall include the recording of applicable documents for implementation of storm water BMP's as described in Appendix C of the King County drainage manual for permeable pavement, Page C6 l-64. A declaration of covenant and grant of easement with the required text of instructions shall be recorded to address the drainage designs as shown on the engineering plans. 2. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded short plat: "Single family residences and other improvements constructed on the lots created by this subdivision must implement the flow control best management practices stipulated in the drainage plan declaration of covenants and grant of easement recorded for each bt. Compliance with this stipulation must be addressed in the small project drainage plan submitted for drainage· review when application is made for a single family residential building permit for the lot." Please be informed that Constructability Review is pending for the subject project and full compliance with review comments (if any) is required for the enQineering review approval Page 6 of 7 lic::on~~ltant Respon~e d~te . ---I Complete Name:' ~'-, (Y/N) I ~ King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Sub I Document .Reference I Item Item. I Referenc~ 10 11 Revi~w Conunents> • Please refer to plans and TIR redline markups and revise accordingly Please submit 4 copies of revised Civil Plans Set and TIR with all County redline markups and a list of responses to this list of comments Page 7 of 7 c~ns~1ta~f'RJ~;Jinse--date -_, ::: ------~ Name,: ---;_ -·-. --·· C(Y/N)> tQ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www.kingcounty.gov May 7, 2008 Robert Johnseine 9805 NE 116th Street, #7499 Kirkland, WA 98034 RE: Permit Fee Estimate: ,Johnseine Short Plat Permit Type: Short Subdivision Engineering Activity L08SR020 Dear Applicant: Thank you for submitting site improvement plans for the Johnseine short subdivision. To implement the engineering review process, the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) has implemented a program for managing certain types of permit applications to provide customers with an enhanced level of customer service. The Project Management program seeks to provide customers with increased predictability for the permit process and better accountability from County review staff. For permit applications under Project Management, a project manager is assigned to the permit to facilitate communication with the applicant and provide a fee estimate to cover the anticipated scope of review. The project manager will also monitor and manage the permit application throughout the review process to ensure review schedules remain in line with performance standards and the overall work hours are within the range of estimated fees for the project. Your application was received by our office on April 28, 2008 and will be processed by a Project Manager. The enclosed information provides a summary of the fee estimate for the anticipated work disciplines and fee estimate revisions which may affect the permit fees. Please return the signed Acknowledgment Form, page 2 of the enclosure, to my attention at the address specified in the letter head. Failure to return the Acknowledgement Form and payment of the estimated fee within I 7 days of the date of this letter may result in the suspension or cancellation of the application. All fee payments shall be made to the cashier in the DOES permit center using activity number L08SR020. Robert Johnseine May 7, 2008 Page2 The enclosed fee estimate includes the scope of work for engineering plan review only and does . not evaluate other final plat requirements such as construction inspection and review of plat recording documents. If you have any questions regarding the permit fees or other aspects of the review process, please contact Peter Dye via email pete.dye@kingcounty.gov or by telephone at 206-296-7185. Sincerely, !~t~. Senior Engineer Land Use Services Division enclosures cc: Robert Stevens, Design Engineer ti King Co11.11nty Land Use Services Division Permit Fee Estimate Permit Number: L08SR020 J Date: May 7, 2008 Permit Title: Johnseine Short Subdivision Permit Type: Short Subdivision J Permit Subtype: SITEREVS Based on permit information submitted by the applicant, the Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) has determined the amount of review fees for the subject application. The fees shown below do not include ancillary permit fees, recording fees, project-related mitigation fees, or other fees that are passed through to the applicant from other agencies or as part of the project's environmental review. Fixed Fees: Counter Service Fee for Application Intake Tree Retention Review Fee Critical Areas Review Base Fee (5 hours) Structural Fees To Be Determined at Final Approval Total Fixed Fees: Estimate for Hourly Fees: ( 112 Hours x $140) Total Permit Fee Estimate: Less Amount Previously Paid: Aniount Due $205.00 $700.00 $905.00 $15,680.00 $16,585.00 $765.00 $15,820.00 Note: The above Estimate for Hourly Fees stated above is based on the total estimated number of hours for yciur project and is calculated using the department's hourly rate in effect at the time the estimate is completed. The total estimated hours and fees reflect work performed by some, or all, of the various disciplines listed on the enclosed Fee Estimating Worksheet. Based upon the enclosed fee estimate revisions, the number of hours required may be modified. Your permit will be billed using th\: installment plan you select, not to exceed three equal monthly payments. Your first Project Management Statement will reflect the installment schedule to be paid for your permit. You may choose to pay the balance in full or make monthly payments. To avoid finance charges, please submit the minimum payment each month. If you have questions about the billing statement, please call Elaine Gregory, Finance Manager, at 206-296-7139 or the Billing Hotline at 206- 296-6659. Page I ltQ King County Land Use Services Division Fee Estimate Acknowledgment Form and Revision Policy Permit Number: L08SR020 Date: 5/07 /08 Permit Title: Johnseine Short Subdivision Permit Type: Short Subdivision Estimated Maximum Billed Hours: Applicant: Robert Johnseine Total Fee: $16,585.00 Amount Due: $15.820.00 Not later than 17 days after the date of this fee estimate letter. the applicant must submit a signed copy of this form to ODES. disputing the estimated cost of this permit and thats/he has read the DOES policy relevant to fee estimate revisions stated below,. Failure to do so will result in the loss of your right to dispute and appeal the estimate and may result in cancellation of the application. Fee Estimate Revision Applicants are responsible for all fixed fees, reported hours performed in reviewing submittal materials and processing, up to the fee estimate. Changes in the scope of the project review will result in a revised review fee estimate. Fee estimates are based on information submitted to DOES by the applicant prior to finalization of the permit application. In addition, estimates are determined by utilizing historical data gathered from projects of similar type, size, and scope. The fee estimate will be the maximum fee charged unless the scope of the project changes. Should fewer hours be required to complete the review, then the applicant may receive a refund for those · hours. If items are identified that are not originally disclosed, a new estimate may be required. Applicants will be responsible for any additional hours identified in a new estimate if: I. The applicant fails to provide accurate, complete, or timely information. 2. The applicant fails to disclose a site or development issue that creates the need for additional review that could not have been reasonably anticipated by the Project Manager during the preparation of the previous Fee Estimate. 3. The applicant changes the scope or design of the proposal, creating the need for additional review that could not have been reasonably anticipated by the Project Manager during the preparation of the previous Fee Estimate. 4. The applicant fails to complete the construction of the project in a timely manner, creating the need for additional review, unanticipated by the Project Manager during the preparation of the previous Fee Estimate. 5. The applicant files an appeal and the Fee Estimate did not anticipate an applicant appeal. · 6. The applicant makes a request to separate the review of the project into distinct phases .7. There has been unauthorized construction on the property, including, but not limited to, clearing or grading, or an associated code enforcement case is opened. 8. The King County Council modifies permit fees. 9. The project is modified, such that there is a change in the building valuation and the resulting building valuation fees. Keeping review fees at or below the fee estimate will depend on the applicant's commitment to complete the process review. This commitment should include submitting materials which address all County codes, policies, previously approved conditions, and responding to the County's request for corrections or additional information in a timely manner, not to exceed 90 days. D Accept the Fee Estimate D Dispute the Fee Estimate Applicant/Owner Name (print) Applicant/Owner Name (signature) Date Page2 W King County INFORMATION ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT STATEMENTS, BILLING/PAYMENT REQUIREMENTS, INSTALLMENT PAYMENT PLANS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT, APPEALS AND FINANCE CHARGES Your application is being reviewed under the Project Management program, you will be provided a budget estimate that is based on historic averages and the information you provided with the application. Once you have received the estimate, it is your responsibility to contact the Project Manager and make arrangements for payment plans. Checks may be made out to King County Finance. Typically 100% of the estimate is due prior to assigning your permit for review. Failure to do this may result in cancellation of your application. The Department may remove your project from the Project Management program under the following conditions: • During project review, the applicant changes the proposal to such an extent that the project is below the Project Management threshold. • To accommodate State and Federal procurement regulations. • In accordance with other contractual agreements between the Department and the applicant, including but not limited to Financial Guarantees. • The applicant requests and the Department concurs, if the Department determines that no value will be added to the overall project or it creates a redundancy in the Project Management process. • Projects in default as defined by K.C.C. 27A.20.020. PROJECT MANAGEMENT STATEMENTS: You will receive a monthly statement showing any used hours against the estimate. The statement also lists all fees and any past due amount, installment due or budget adjustments that must be paid by the first of the following month. PAYMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS: Your permit submittal may qualify for participation in a DOES Finance Section policies installment plan. Under the plan, you must pay an initial amount, typically 50% of the fee estimate plus 100% of fixed fees. The remaining balance will be billed in monthly installments. Each monthly statement will include any past due amounts, current fees, or budget adjustments, and any installments due by the first of the following month. You will be required to pay the 'Total Amount Due' as reflected on the "Remittance Advice" page for your Project Management Statement. Any remaining balance will be billed in equal monthly installments on subsequent Project Management Statements. You may make full payment of the 'Total Balance' reflected on the first page of the Project Management Statement at any time; however. you must make the amount due on the remittance advice in order to avoid finance (late) charges. If the project is approved before all of the installment payments are billed, all outstanding balances will be billed on the subsequent statement. FINANCE CHARGES: To avoid finance charges, payment will be required prior to the due date listed on the remittance advice of the statement. Finance charges are assessed on the outstanding delinquent balance. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND APPEALS: By checking the Accept the fee estimate box, the applicant/owner accepts the fee estimate provided in this letter and waives the right to dispute the estimate. By checking the Dispute the fee estimate box, the applicant contests the fee estimate and requests a Director review and appeal of the fee estimate. The applicant must return the acknowledgement form accompanied by a statement of facts supporting the dispute to ODES within 17 days of the date of this fee estimate letter. DOES will issue a decision within 14 days of receipt of the applicant dispute. ODES' decision is final unless the applicant files with DOES a combined Notice and Statement of Appeal together with the $50 appeal fee within 17 days after DOES mails the decision. The applicant may only appeal an adverse decision, in which DOES denied all or a portion of the dispute. The appeal is heard by the Hearing Examiner, who will conduct a closed record hearing on the fee estimate appeal. The burden is on the applicant to demonstrate that the fee estimate is unreasonable. If the Hearing Examiner determines that DOES' fee estimate was unreasonable, the Hearing Examiner may modify the fee estimate or provide other relief the Hearing Examiner determines is reasonably necessary. If the applicant is the substantial· prevailing party on the appeal, the $50 appeal fee is refunded. The Hearing Examiner's decision is final. Acknowledgement and the required application .materials are mandatory prior to the review of the permit application. In addition, you are still required to pay the deposit, current balance and any future installments. Failure to do so will result in finance charges. Page3 ~ King County Land Use Services Division Engineering Review Section Printed Date 05107108 Project Management Fee Estimating Worksheet Permit Type: S1te'.Rtan!LShQ'.rf P18ii:;u~hi~kif411SYJ Prepared For: rJOti'ifS8lrie!1i&0:11m1Hrr!\1g;;,fiiJ&f>f1iill!lrn PermiUPreApp No: '~'i:08SR02'Qjf Permit Type: SITEREV Submitted: fo41287fi'Oti'ifft?f±'tlP!hlElifi'.2:lciifE;iiJffiV'Jslf:1!!011 Subtype: SITEREVS Fixed Fees: Aiith6i"i Intake Group 2 B. Fire Flow and Access 27.10.040 BUdget Default · HOUri LtSted Fei8S Hours... ESt 205.00 Date'-Prepare<J: APPli_ci:iblEl . F'ixed Fee Houri Fee $ 205.00 Type of Permit Not Applicable C. Boundary line adjustment 27.10.220 Incl. 1st 4 hours of review D. Forestry/Tree Retention _ . 27.10.090 ~;;1:o;oofli~Acres I Enpineerln; ReVlew:· !E~ _·. _;_ l SIM ~11liiiMrn1U 1t!dilJ. I Final_ SLll'Ve~·RevleW::(fR~ r. §Jbdlelrbd. 111fai 1ffiG@@i· Boundary line adjustment C00Sth:a'Ctabm ':R&Yi8W.:F88SS SI Review and Fee Estimate 2,. id.JOG 21. 16.ffb 27.10.220 Fee est. and Project Management 0. Nonresidential review Geotech Streams Wetlands 560.00 15 Critical Area Estimate after 5 hours: s min. per lot L'EtlrnJ'iifmil~ Lots N. Other (Shorelines, FPA) 27.10.140 ·o. Plans Examiner Review Enter Fixed + plan review fee from Permit Plus: l!sinrttH@ 50 Jii(11fljfi\ Hrs. @Stnrlfic@ 2 li'.J~;Sf2!21 Hrs. 6 i!:?2!(:['.6i Hrs. $ 840.00 9 0\i!!i1l[1!$; Hrs. $ 1,260.00 5 700.00 Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. 3 Hrs. $ 420.00 • ijij~fliiiEI Hrs. Total Fixed Fees: 5 $ 905.00 Estimated Review Hours Above Base Hours: 112 Hourly Fee: $ 15,680.00 Total Estimated Review Hours: 117 Total Fee Estimate: $16,585.00 Minimum Payment Amount: $8,745.00 PM-ERSFeeEstimate.xls Version 021108 ·' ti King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Project Type : 8 Lots Short Plat Project Name : Pleasant Path Project Number : L07S0018 Activity Number: L08SR020 . ~ d J /\lb ~ I,./ sf~i(l,11 Engineering Review Comments Review Date : 09/25/2008 Reviewer: Review No.: 1 s, Email: Phone: Fax: . Mazen Haidar, P.E. mazen.haidar@kingcounty.gov (206) 296 -7133 (206)206-6613 Sub Document Consultant Response date Complete Reference Item Review Comments Item Reference Name: (Y/N) . Sheet 1 Please show the USPS approval stamp and signature for mailboxes location Sheet 5 For the proposed on-site access road, please revise plans to show centerline of road same as center line of road ROW Per approved road variance L07V0022 conditions please verify that a minimum 169-feet separation is maintained between centerline of on-site access road/ROW and center line of SE 123rd Street. Also, · olease show the name of SE 123'• Street on ~ lans Please clarify/ label whether spot elevation around the Cul-De-Sac (CDS) as shown are at flow the line or at the ton of the curb Please label the classification of 148"' Ave. NE as Urban Collector Arterial Please revise the pavement taper at the north terminus of the frontage road improvements to a soeed limit to 1 as renuired for Arterial roadwavs J\f> A-C,/fS 5 \ l.J-( {)4-- Page 1 of 6 ., ti King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Sub Document Reference Item Item Reference Sheet 6 Sheet 7 Consultant Response date Complete Review Comments •Name: (YIN) .. ~e separ~~s f~~Trees_with , sta ard te d details e Please revise DDES Approval Block as shown in red as show on all plan sheets except the standard cover sheet Please show the existing fog line in 148"' on plans in plan views and in road section, and show saw cut line at the foQ line Please replace the pavement overly note with the following note: Per the 2007 KCRS Section 4.03, a 1.5 inch full width overlay shall be required. Appropriate repairs to the existing subgrade, base material, surfacing and pre-level may be required prior to placing the.overlay. The overlay may be waived only upon written request and after an evaluation of pavement conditions and/or channelization requirements has been completed and approved by the County Road Enqineer or Develooment Enaineer. Please remove the proposed water and sewer improvements from the plan and profile views. Please add a table on the plan for the individual lots storm stub-outs showing the its stations, stations offset, invert elevation, rim elevation and oioe size Page 2 of 6 ti King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Sub Document Reference Item Item Reference Sheet 8 Consultant Response date Complete Review Comments Name: (Y/N) Please revise the proposed storm pipes layouts at the intersection of the on-site access with 1481h as show on plan. This should minimize the amount of uncontrolled flows entering KC ROW and should maximize the amount of flows generated in 148'" to be routed to the proposed RID Vault Please label Tract "A" as Landscape Tract encumbering a public drainage easement to King County for ihe proposed RID facility In profile design views, please clearly where existing grade and proposed grade are taken at, such road centerline, flow line, or center of pipe. In profile design views please show the followings: a. New flow line profile for improvements in 148'" b. Property line station, ROW stations, tract stations, and lot lines stations C. New I ex. ditch flow line for improvements in 148th d. CB stations and stations offset e. CB !voes Please revise the vault bottom per the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), fiqure 6.4.2A, oaoe 6-88 Please show~e wall in the vault 1" cell Page 3 of 6 <f feA ~ qi.,li> c»JC ~ King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Sub Document Reference Item Item Reference Consultant Response date Complete Review Comments Name: (Y/N) . Please revise the opening~een cell 2 and the detention portion of thJ" to match the width of cell 1, and show handr · n orrosive material between cell 2 an e detention portion of the vault Show 5' X 10' openings for equipments access with hinged man access in vault details, and make sure the total access openings area is at least 4% of the total vault bottom area , Show footing drains line for the vault in the vault details and show the downstream discharge point location for the drain line Please clearly label the control structure location on plans Page 4 of 6 ti King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Sub Document Reference Item Item Reference TIR Review Comments Please include the maintenance access to the vault in the areas calculations and revise as needed Please submit reduced peak-flow calculations for the pre and developed conditions, and either show 2-yr + 10-yr + Duration matching or 25-yr + Duration matching. Please revise all calculations as needed. Please submit Bond Quantities Calculations in TIR v'~r ,A~__j_.,C~~' Page5of6 --r~s~ ~ TV't><~ ,,4-r__fi -Consultant Response date Complete Name: (Y/N) ti King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Sub Document Reference Item Item Reference General . Review Comments Please provide Horizontal Control Plan with complete information Please submit pavement design calculations for the proposed pavement widening in 148th based on / actual field soils conditions Please provide 3 sets of structural plans for the .,. proposed RID vault with design calculations Please submit 10 copies of Landscape Plans under separate Land Use Miscellaneous application, and make sure street trees are not part of the Landscape Plans. Street trees shall be on a / seoarate olans and exolained above Please submit 5 sets of Separate Significant Trees Plans --· Please submit 4 sets Illumination plans for improvements in 148th --- Please refer to plans and TIR redline markups and revise accordingly Please submit 4 copies of revised Civil Plans Set and TIR with all County redline markups and a list of responses to this list of comments Ct/1'S-J._r"~t,i/,·~ ~ 6'l :': ~ . - ~-fr~. v,. '*"''s. Page 6 of 6 Consultant Response date Complete Name: (Y/N) ti KingCounty Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Date: October 13, 2008 Robert Stevens, P .E. CORE Design 14711 N.E. 29 1h Place Suite 101 Bellevue, WA 98007 RE: Pleasant Path Short Plat L08SR020,L07S0018 Dear Mr. Stevens, Our office has completed the initial review of engineering plans for the Pleasant Path Short Plat. The attached list of review comments dated October 13, 2008 provides summary of design issues which must be addressed in your next submittal. The review comments are based upon the design plans and technical information report received on April 28, 2008. Once the initial review comments have been addressed, please submit 4 sets of revised plans and technical reports. To assist in reviewing the revised plans, the design engineer should prepare a written response for each issue identified in the attached comments. If you desire an electronic copy ofmy review comments, please send an email to mazen.haidar@kingcounty.gov. If you have questions regarding the design requirements for the project, please contact me at 206-296- 7133 for assistance. Sincerely, Mazen Haidar, P.E. Review Engineer Enclosure cc: Mr. Robert Johnseine, Pleasant Path LLC ti1 KingCounty Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Date: October 13, 2008 Robert Stevens, P .E. CORE Design 14711 N.E. 29th Place Suite 101 Bellevue, WA 98007 RE: Pleasant Path Short Plat L08SR020,L07S0018 Dear Mr. Stevens, Our office has completed the initial review of engineering plans for the Pleasant Path Short Plat. The attached list of review comments dated October 13, 2008 provides summary of design issues which must be addressed in your next submittal. The review comments are based upon the design plans and technical information report received on April 28, 2008. Once the initial review comments have been addressed, please submit 4 sets of revised plans and technical reports. To assist in reviewing the revised plans, the design engineer should prepare a written response for each issue identified in the attached comments. If you desire an electronic copy ofmy review comments, please send an email to mazen.haidar@kingcounty.gov. If you have questions regarding the design requirements for the project, please contact me at 206-296- 7133 for assistance. Sincerely, Mazen Haidar, P.E. Review Engineer Enclosure cc: Mr. Robert Johnseine, Pleasant Path LLC Haidar, Mazen From: Sent: To: Dye, Pete Friday, October 03, 2008 1:11 PM Haidar, Mazen Here's the bmp notes for Pleasant Path. I. The final short plat shall include the recording of applicable documents for implementation of storm water BMP's as described in Appendix C of the King County drainage manual for permeable pavement, Page C61-64. A declaration of covenant and grant of easement with the required text of instructions shall be recorded to address the drainage designs as shown on the engineering plans. 2. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded short plat: "Single family residences and other improvements constructed on the lots created by this subdivision must implement the flow control best management practices stipulated in the drainage plan declaration of covenants and grant of easement recorded for each lot. Compliance with this stipulation must be addressed in the small project drainage plan submitted for drainage review when application is made for a single family residential building permit for the lot." Peter Dye Senior Engineer King County DOES Land Use Services Division 206-296-7185 1 I Routing! Project List I Project Budget! Schedule I Reports Jver. 2.6 SEND THIS PAGE 3/9/2009 &!Jl 0 PERMIT ILOBMI075 I 0 STATION I r;,11 JOHNSEINE ROBERT 0 Intake El I Permit Center PCEN Entire File Review El RELATED PERMITS I l~I I Search ] IView CommentJ [~ I Print I PERSON I I STATusl -----~ ' TYPE ' "' I ~~,,,;, • • -''"' -,---,o:- STATUS , , ; ) --:'.i:\' I ''~ . : NOT STARTED 0 L-MISC MISC-OTH COMPLETE -----FINISHED Magat, l~esjor 12/31/200812/31/2008 12/31/2008 12/31/2008 i-·--------1 Current Planning Review ' iPLNR Entire File QUEUED 12/31/2008 Monday, Mar 09, 2009 08:06 AM User: haidarm Computer: DE235354 Os: Windows NT Version: 5.1 I Routing ! Project List l Project Budget! Schedule ! Reports I LOBSR020 Project Manager: Dye, Pete Permit Type: SITEREV / SITEREVS Permit Number: I LOBSR020 -JOHNSEINE Budget Status: LOCKED !.A.dd Function I j View Defaults I [save Comrnent) 3/2/2009 % Due at App: >=I 5=0 == Number of Installments: L..13 __ ....J PM Statement for this Permit [ Unlock Budget) I Cancel , -i!F,Jio.c-:ii:' -~ -@1is1wiei,81i1J,;~~::;rr:;\ -:I,,M1les10,ie-2--:;-· ~:::1-·:;::r;p\11 ,.::r~~~l1Ta"fife1:::MI ER )so I )25 I 75 75 FR 1, I D 2 12 I GO D D 4 D PM D D 9 D PN D D 2 D SI lo I D 6 D TR ITO D 15 IT[=:] WL 12 I D 4 14 I Total 72 45 117 117 Comments: View Comments Monday, Mar 02, 2009 08:22 AM User: haidarm Computer: DE235354 Os: Windows NT Version: 5.1 King County Department of Development Enviormantal Services Detailed Time Report by Function (see SOC) L08SR020 SITEREV Fn Dale Employee type fn t11sk hours 110/e ER Engineering Review 05/07/2008 Sanders, James RH ER 945 Meetings 0.25 Met w/ PDYE re: project scope & est 09/22/2008 Haidar, Mazen RH ER 100 Case/Plan Review 4.5 Review of contruction plans and TIR 09/23/2008 Foster, Curtis RH ER 100 Case/Plan Review 0.25 Meeting with Mazen (PA language issue). 09/23/2008 Haidar, Mazen RH ER 100 Case/Plan Review 7 Continued review of contruction plans and TIR 09/24/2008 Haidar, Mazen RH ER 100 Case/Plan Review 7.5 Completed review of contruction plans and TIR + long telephone discussion with e 09/25/2008 Haidar, Mazen RH ER 100 Case/Plan Review 2.5 Compiled list of issues and updated project system files 10/02/2008 Haidar, Mazen RH ER 100 Case/Plan Review QIC I project disc. w/pm 10/07/2008 Haidar, Mazen RH ER 100 Case/Plan Review Q/C mtg. + Traffic issues 1011312008 Haidar, Mazen RH ER 100 Case/Plan Review Finaliazed and updated list of issues, malle cover letter and review comments to 1012912008 Haidar, Mazen RH ER 100 Case/Plan Review 0.75 Proe3jct issues cord. w/engr. + Traffic for ADA ramp 02109/2009 Haidar, Mazen RH ER 100 Case/Plan Review 3 Resubmittal Reviwe 02/1012009 Haidar, Mazen RH ER 100 Case/Plan Review 2.25 Plans review 02/11/2009 Haidar, Mazen RH ER 100 Case/Plan Review 1.5 Plans review 02/12/2009 Haidar, Mazen RH ER 100 Case/Plan Review 2.75 Continued Plans review 0211812009 Haidar, Mazen RH ER 100 Case/Plan Review 2 Plans review 02/19/2009 Haidar, Mazen RH ER 100 Case/Plan Review 1.5 Plans review 02/23/2009 Haidar, Mazen RH ER 100 Case/Plan Review 5.25 Continued review of plans and TIR 0212412009 Haidar, Mazen RH ER 100 Case/Plan Review 5.5 Completed plans and TIR reviews 02/2512009 Haidar, Mazen RH ER 100 Case/Plan Review 1.5 List of issues and project cord. Summary For ER Function L08SR020 51.00 Hours Total PM Project Management 05/05/2008 Dye, James RH PM 100 Case/Plan Review 2 Review site plan, TIR, prepare draft fee estimate letters 0510712008 Dye, James RH PM 100 Case/Plan Review 1.75 finalize fee estimate, update file, copies, mail. 07/2212008 Dye, James RH PM 100 Case/Plan Review 0.5 Update finance records, prepare file for assignment. 0712912008 Dye, James RH PM 100 Case/Plan Review 0.5 Review file contents, update computer, assign to Mazen. 0912412008 Dye, James RH PM 100 Case/Plan Review 0.25 Discuss drainage designs. 1010212008 Dye, James RH PM 100 Case/Plan Review Review meeting with Mazen. Summary For PM Function LOBSR020 6.00 Hours Total TR Traffic Review 1010612008 Langley, Kristen CH TR 190 0.25 Research in prep for 10n meeting with MHAID 1010712008 Langley, Kristen CH TR 945 Meetings 0.25 Meeting with MHAID to discuss his traffic issues on the SR Summary For TR Function LOBSR020 0.50 Hours Total Monday, Afarclt 02, 2009 Page I of 2 ?-p p p m fl) ti King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Project Type : 8 Lots ShortPlat Engineering Review Comments • mazen.haidar@kintjcbunty gov 10/13/2008 j R~xill',1/~r :: { Mazen Haidar, F';:•E. Project Name : Pleasant Path 1st Email : F'roject Number : L07S0018 Phone.: (t06).296-7f}3 Activity Number : L08SR020 Fax:> (206) 206 -6613 Sub I Document Coni;ultartt f{esponse date Name: · Reference I .Item Sheet 1 1 1 c:..... uuil 2 )> © z ". uuil ----= c Cc€ = uuil 3 4 5 Item I Reference Review Comments Please show the USPS approval stamp and si_g_nature for mailboxes location For the proposed on-site access road, please revise plans to show centerline of road same as center line of road ROW _Per approved road variance L07V0022 conditions please verify that a minimum 169-feet separation is maintained between centerline of on-site access road/ROW and center line of SE 123"' Street. Also, lease show the name of SE 123'd Street on plans Please clarify/ label whether spot elevation around the Cul-De-Sac (CDS) as shown are at flow the line or at the top of the curb Please label the classification of 148m Ave. NE as Urban Collector Arterial Please revise the pavement taper at the north terminus of the frontage road improvements to a speed limit to 1 as required for Arterial roadways Page 1 of 7 (Y/N) w King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Sub -I Document . Reference !Item <,t~m .1.Reference 6 7 8 Sheet 6 1 2 Sheet 7 1 2 - Revi.ew Comments Consultant;R.es~.c,nse;iiate t.,iame: Please curb cut at the intersection of proposed Private Access Tract and the on-site access road Please revise DOES Approval Block as shown in red as show on all plan sheets except the standard cover sheet Please add ADA ramp on the west side of 148111 across the street from the _subject short plat Please show the existing fog line in 148'" on plans in plan views and in road section, and show saw cut line at the foQ line Please replace the pavement overly note with the following note: Per the 2007 KCRS Section 4.03, a 1.5 inch full width overlay shall be required. Appropriate repairs to the existing subgrade, base material, surfacing and pre-level may be required prior to placing the overlay. The overlay may be waived only upon written request and after an evaluation of pavement conditions and/or channelization requirements has been completed and approved by the County Road Engineer or Development Engineer. Please remove the proposed water and sewer improvements from the plan and profile views. Please add a table on the plan for the individual Jots storm stub-outs showing the its stations, stations off_set, invert elevation, rim _elevation and pipe size Page 2 of 7 .· Co..;;J,~tit .. (YIN) tQ King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov I .. .. •, Sub Doclunent ·· Reference Item Item Reference 3 4 5 6 Sheet 8 1 2 .. ,·. ' ') 'cJn;u1tanfRJ;ponse date ..•. ---·····••?(_·· .• J:!r 1/tomplete .. Review Comments IC .,· cc·· . ,. }'f NarfieI=c ' ' . .. -~~t ·· .,;.f(fN). • .... --.-. . ,.;,· :. C • Please revise the proposed storm pipes layouts at the intersection of the on-site access with 148th as show on plan. This should minimize the amount of. uncontrolled flows entering KC ROW and should maximize the amount of flows generated in 148th to be routed to the orooosed RID Vault Please label Tract "A" as Landscape Tract encumbering a public drainage easement to King Countv for the orooosed RID facilitv In profile design views, please clearly where existing grade and proposed grade are taken at, such road centerline, flow line, or center of oice. In profile design views please show the followings: a. New flow line profile for improvements in 148th b. Property line station, ROW stations, tract stations, and lot lines stations C. New / ex. ditch flow line for improvements in 148th d. CB stations and stations offset e. CB !voes Please revise the vault bottom per the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), fiaure 6.4.2A, pasie 6-88 Show 5' X 1 O' openings for equipments access with hinged man access in vault details, and make sure the total access openings area is at least 4% of the total vault bottom area Page 3 of 7 ti King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Reference I Item . I 3 4 5 6 TIR 1 2 3 General 1 2 3 Sub · t lt4llll _ Document Reference Review Commentii; Show footing drains line for the vault in the vault details and show the downstream discharge point location for the drain line - Please clearly label the control structure location on .elans Maintenance access should be provided to all _g_rates opening in the proposed vault Drainage Easement shall be shown within proposed Tract A and B Please include the maintenance access to the vault in the areas calculations and revise as needed Please submit reduced peak-flow calculations· for the pre and developed conditions, and either show 2-yr + 10-yr + Duration matching or 25-yr + Duration matching. Please revise all calculations as needed. Please submit Bond Quantities Calculations in TIR Please provide Horizontal Control Plan with complete information - Please submit pavement design calculations for the proposed pavement widening in 148th based on actual field soils conditions Please provide 3 sets of structural plans for the proposed RID vault with design calculations __ Page 4 of 7 Consulta11t Resp<> ll_~i'date Name: ~r complete 1 ·· . (Y/N) tQ King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Sub I Document Referenc«f[item •. Item_ I Reference 4 5 6 7 Review Corril'l'l~hti=fc:t Please submit 1 O copies of Landscape Plans under separate Land Use Miscellaneous application, and make sure street trees are not part of the Landscape Plans. Street trees shall be on a separate plans and explained above Please submit 5 sets of Separate Significant Trees Plans Please submit 4 sets Illumination plans for ime_rovements in 148th __ Please submit 4 sets channelization plans for ime_rovements in 148th Page 5 of 7 Consulta!:!t Re~'~on~e;<tate• Name··: cohlpletf; ji/'JN) ti King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov · Reference I Item 8 9 '_ Sub.-.l~·Doc-ument 'Jtem ]"RefE!rence · Reviev.iCoinments . ' Please show the following drainage BMP on the plans: l. The final short plat shall include the recording of applicable documents for implementation of storm water BMP's as described in Appendix C of the King County drainage manual for permeable pavement, Page C6 l-64. A declaration of covenant and grant of easement with the required text of instructions shall be recorded to address the drainage designs as shown on the engineering plans. 2. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded short plat: "Single family residences and other improvements constructed on the lots created by this subdivision must implement the flow control best management practices stipulated in the drainage plan declaration of covenants and grant of easement recorded for each bt. Compliance with this stipulation must be addressed in the small project drainage plan submitted for drainage review when application is made for a single family residential building permit for the lot." Please be informed that Constructability Review is pending for the subject project and full compliance with review comments (if any) is required for the eni:iineerini:i review approval Page 6 of 7 Narri;: . <~' Complete,· (Y/N) w King County Department of Development And Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Sub I DocumeriH Reference J Item Item· 10 11 - Review Cornrtients. Please refer to plans and TIR red line markups and revise accordingly Please submit 4 copies of revised Civil Plans Set and TIR with all County redline markups and a list of responses to this list of comments Page 7 of 7 Consult.inf RespoWse d~te _Naine: 'ti king County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Engineering Review Comments Review Date: 10/13/2008 Reviewer Name: Mazen Haidar, P.E. Project Type : 8 Lots Short Plat Project Name : Pleasant Path Short Plat Review No.: 1st· Email: mazen.haidar@kinqcounty.gov Project Number : L07S0018 . Activity Number • _L_0_8_S __ R_o2-o-'--..------------------------------ Phone: (206)296-713.3 ·. t-ax.: {2Uti) 296.-6613 · Project Manager: Peter Dye, P.E. Sub Document Review Comments and Code Reference Consultant Response Date: 1/26/09 Complete Item Item Reference Name: Gina Brooks, P.E. IY/NI Sheet 1 1 Please show the USPS approval stamp and signature for Postmaster approval located in Section 6 of TIR. / mailboxes location Sheet 5 1 For the proposed on-site access road, please revise plans to Revised as requested. / show centerline of road same as centerline of ROW "::I DJ! Per approved road variance L07V0022 conditions please Refer to station callouts. SE 123rd St located at Sta / -~ verify that a minimum 169-feet separation is maintained 10+00. Road A centerline located at Sta 11 +69 which ~ C-between centerline of on-site access road/ROW and provides minimum 169' separation. Also, see Sheet 7 p ~ @ centerline of SE 123rd Street. Also, please show the name of 148th profile for reference to road variance. -r-,:. {iiiil SE 123rd Street on clans b -.l C3' Please clarify/ label whether spot elevation around the Cul-De Revised as requested. / iTI ,.._, ~ Sac (CDS) as shown are at the flow line or at the top of the = en = r.;;;i = curb \ 3J Please label the classification of 148th Avenue NE as Urban Revised as requested. <./"' Collector Arterial 5 Please revise the pavement taper at the north terminus of the Pvmt taper at south end remains 3:1 since "no liablility" frontage road improvements to speed limit to 1 as required for for vehicles, Pvmt taper at north end revised to 1 O: 1. .;__ Arterial Roadwavs KCRTS lists no req'mts for ovmt taoers. 6 Please show curb cut at the intersection of proposed Private Not required since vehicles can drive over rolled curb. / Access Tract and the on-site access road 7 Please revise the DOES Approval Block as shown in red on all Revised as requested. Is(_ nlan sheets exceot the standard cover sheet 8 Please add ADA ramp on the west side of 148th across the street from the subiect short olat location Revised as requested. ,/ Sheet 6 1 Please show the existing fog line in 148th on plans in plan Revised as requested. views and in the road section, and show saw cut line at the fog ,/ line ~ Sub Document Review Comments and Code Reference Consultant Response Date: 1/26/09 Complete Item Item Reference . Name: Gina Brooks, P.E. IY/Nl 2 Please replace the pavement overly note with the following This project is required to follow the standards within note: Per the 2007 KCRS Section 4.03, a 1.5 inch full width the 1993 KCRS. A note based on the requirement overlay shall be required. Appropriate repairs to the existing within Section 4.01 of the 1993 KCRS has been added. subgrade, base material. surfacing and pre-level may be / required prior to placing"the overlay. The overlay may be waived only upon written request and after an evaluation of pavement conditions and/or channelization requirements has been completed and approved by the County Road Engineer or Develooment Enaineer. Sheet 7 1 Please remove the proposed water and sewer improvements Revised as requested. / from the olan and orofile views 2 Please add a table on the plan for the individual lots storm Revised as requested. / stub-outs showing its stations, stations off-set, invert elevation, rim elevation and oioe size 3 Please revise the proposed storm pipes layouts at the Per phone conversation with you on 10/20/08, the storm intersection of the on-site access road with 148th as shown on layout as shown is acceptable. The storm system plan. This should minimize the amount of uncontrolled flows collects an equal amount of area that will be improved. / entering KC ROW and should minimize the amount of flows generated in 148th to be routed to the proposed RID vault 4 Please label Tract "A" as landscape tract encumbering a See "Additional Notes #3" on Sheet 5 for designation, public drainage easement dedicated to King County for the ownership and storm easement language. cZ__ R/D facilities 5 In profile design views, please clearly show where existing Revised as requested. grade and proposed grades are taken at, such as road ~ centerline, flow line, or centerline of oioe 6 In orofile desian views olease show the followings: ,/ a. New flow line orofile for imnrovements in 148th Revised as reauested. v' b. Property line station, ROW stations, tract line stations, and Lot line stations not required per phone conversation / lot lines stations with vou on 10/20/08. c. New/ ex. ditch flow line for imorovements in 148th Revised as reauested. .,.. d. CB satiations and stations offset Revised as reauested. V e. CB hmes Revised as reauested. v Sheet 8 1 Please revise the vault bottom per the 2005 King County Vault bottom has been designed per the 2005 Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) figure 6.4.2A page KCSWDM. See response to same comment on plans. C<_ 6-88 2 Show 5' X 1 O' openings for equipments access with hinged A 5' X 14' grate has been provided which exceeds the man access in the vault detail, and make sure total access minimum 5' X10' requirement. The 5' X 14' grate also ~ openings area is at least 4% of the total vault bottom area satisfies access requirements on page 6-86 of the 2005 KCSWDM. See Section 4C of TIR as well. 3 Show footing drains line for the vault in the vault details and Revised as requested. show the downstream discharge point location the footing c/ drain line 4 Please clearlv label the control structure location on plans Revised as reauested. I)\ .. Sub Document Review Comments and Code Reference Consultant Response Date: 1/26/09 Complete Item Item Reference Name: Gina Brooks, P.E. IV/NI 5 Maintenance access should be provided to all grate openings Vehicle access has been provided to within 10' of all / in the proposed vault access locations. 6 Drainage Easement shall be shown within proposed Tracts A Easements added to Tract B but not required for Tract ~ and B A since entire Tract A is a drainaqe easement. TIR 1 Please include the maintenance access to the vault in the See Section 4C of the Report for required grating ~ areas calculations and revise as needed calculation over the 2nd cell. 2 Please submit reduced peak-flow calculations for the pre and Revised as requested. developed conditions, and either show 2-yr + 10-yr + Duration / matching or 25-yr + Duration matching. Please revise all calculations as needed. J Please submit Bond Quantities Calculations and include in TIR Revised as requested. v"" General 1 Please provide Horizontal Control Plan with complete Refer to Sht 3 for boundary information as required per ,__.,/' information General Plan Format#5 on nn 2-19 KCSWDM. 2 Please submit pavement design calculations for the proposed See Section 6 of the TIR for pavement design. --{, ,cc pavement widening in 148th based on actual field soils \:> {'I conditions J Please provide 3 sets of structural plans for the proposed R/D Attached as requested. / vault with desion calculations 4 Please submit 1 O copies Landscape Plans under separate Landscape plans have been approved. Approved 1. Land Use Miscellaneous application, and make sure street landscape plans are enclosed within Civil/Landscape trees are not part of the Landscape Plans. Street trees shall Plans attached. be on a separate plans and as explained above. -? 5 Please submit 5 sets of Seoarate Sionificant Trees Plans Not req'd per "Project Notes" on Sheet L 1.01. / 6 Please submit 4 sets of Illumination Plans for improvements in Attached as requested. __,.. 148th 7 Please submit 4 sets of Channelization Plans for Channelization Plan labeled as sheet C7.01 in Civil Plan A f--,r' imorovements in 148th Set. 3>0 8 Please show the following drainage BMP notes on the plans: See "Notes #3" on Sheet 7. a. The final short plat shall include the recording of applicable documents for implementation of storm water BMP's as c/ described in Appendix C of the King County drainage manual for permeable pavement, Page C61-64. A declaration of covenant and grant of easement with the required text of instructions shall be recorded to address the drainage designs as shown on the engineering plans .. .. Sub Document Review Comments and Code Reference Consultant Response Date: 1/26/09 Complete Item Item Reference Name: Gina Brooks, P.E. IY/Nl b. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded short plat: "Single family residences and other improvements constructed on the lots created by this subdivision must implement the flow control best management practices stipulated in the drainage plan declaration of covenants and grant of easement recorded for each lot. Compliance with this stipulation must be addressed in the small project drainage / plan submitted for drainage review when application is made for a single family residential building permit for the lot." 9 Please be informed that Constructability Review is pending for Noted. the subject project and full compliance with review comments / (if any) is required for the engineering review approval 10 Please refer to plans and TIR redline markups and revise Noted. / accordinalv 11 Please submit 4 copies of revised Civil Plans Sets and Tl R Revised Civil Plans, Revised TIR, County redlined Civil / with all County redline markups and a list of responses to this Plans and Tl R are attached. list of comments -" -··-: (.~·-••• J•1. t/.51.!'" 1 I' •'~L'1'1$it' , ,.Q!!1t•:i.\!!lll1~tiP!:>;. 11 -:;,, I' I If, , 1,,, ',', A!:liviilffi"."Affac~d·.10 thii"P.iO~CCf" 'Acii'Vif :N,) '1'"',ift"" '• 'O'ate~"'' ""···· i'Sf,i'U*' ',:, • 11,·· ' A09BN135 BOND 06/24/2009 CANCELED ,: (! .; . LON0022 SUBVAA 03/16/2007 GRANTED ·u:!I L-MISC 12/31/2008 COMPLETE !"; SITEAEV 04/24/2008 PENDING '1111 (·· INSPECT 02/26/2009 CANCELED ! ,, ,;_,;i!j INSPECT 02/26/2009 CANC£LED (..JI. INSPECT 01/08/2009 CANCELED } \,,, ( ,!I './,,,,·, I,)• ',;' "· Tuesday, Jul 21, 2009 11 :55 AM User: carlsonj Computer: DE242927 Os: Windows NT Version: 5.1 ,,-" ~ -~ ' TITLE STATION Protect 'Maoaae Proa !11.!" NotiCB. ofDeCision·, - Tuesday, Jul 21, 2009 11 :56 AM User: carlsonj Computer: DE242927 Os: Windows NT Version: 5.1 .. ~ •• • ix 7 /2112009 !:i§1I! C SUBTYPE STATUS .. ~ I Routing I Proje'ct Listj Pri;Jje(it Budtiet'I sCheE;Jul~J ~epqrt;s·Jver. 2.6 SEND THIS PAGE Ii i.u,,i, •d,·H.-i!:.;, ........ ,, J . '., ",., • • 7 /21 /2009 l:lm TITLE I i;:JO::::H~Nc:;.SE~IN~E:!!/P:.:,L!::,'.EA:,:S~A~NT'-'P:::A~TH).;S:!:P_~!!;.'.~·-'-'-'-'-lJ-..Jl!e,.S!Pc£R~OYE.;. :!:!P:J,•!!111!''-'~-"" Intake El -- STATION ITEM ~ermjt C_enter , Complete Application,, CAPP Enti.(~,FH~{:, , . : ~JNIS~~p ~, ': ?3{,!~/:2~~10,41/3f2\l0,! /0411312601'04113/2~07 :i Tuesday, Jul 21, 2009 11 :56 AM User: car1sonj Computer: DE242927 Os: Windows NT Version: 5.1 !-di IX -~ . . ' . l1fI .,l\,dqr~~~Jfl htte,://ddeshome/prms2/prms.asp?curT ab•Routfng&permitNo•L07S0018 712112009 l::WR !JOHNSEINE .... TITLE PHIH·lffiKBfllll_llll_ .. _ .. J143 ]llff j~ _ _!§i!.EREY ,_l§ITEREYS !PENDING j!fl; ,Intake§] IB ....... 1111 .. r ~ermrt Center , j IPcE~,Entrre Frie ,I !RINISHEDj~~ders !o412412008!04128/2DOB!o4/2812008:o4128/20081t. Project Manageme~t El I tf! •• • ........ ;f ERS Office Tech ._ .. ' ERS Entire Frie, • • lF1N 1 1SHED)JCarlson · · lo4/2812tXJS1o4/29/2008 lo412912ooa!o4129120;tf:,: f.c--_....,,. ___ ......;---"l+'-' _, =· +-'---'-' ;..' "--...:.+.::,-• oanne , b . . 1 I :/; , . ~1Proiect Manage Prog 1 ; • 2 PMGR Fee Estimate , tflN1SljEJiillV9~~{/i2~~~9~~2~~~@"2QQ(l3 ;,1 STATION lt:l 111-11111111 .. tlllll!l&a~:I ........................ ,...... ..... .......... . .. ....... .. . ... , .. ,.... ... ...... . ... . . . .. .. .. ...... ,... .. .. . . .... , .. ,. .. .. . . . , ' . . .... !il Review El STATION Tuesday, Jul 21, 2009 11 :57 AM User: carlsonj Computer: DE242927 Os: Windows NT Version: 5.1 STATION Proiect Manage Proo c::J Land Use Inspection .s.e.ru Fin. Guarantee ERS Office Tech. Development Engineer Land Use Inspection Plans DOI Ro~ds ~9or,dina1ioo ERS Fees DENG Mylars LUlP Approved Plan Set m-,---~" /, _R9A,~ ?~ii ~l~r.~' Tuesday, Jul 21, 2009 11 :57 AM ,-.-.-~ Waite7s E,INISHED . Qfil!!J User: carlsonj Computer: DE242927 Os: Windows NT Version: 5.1 --·------""M; ,,j 7/21/2009 !::WR -1· '· I . ~ --~ -S-1 T_IE_S_T_R_U_C_T_U_R_E_S_ I A Division of Kosnik Engineering, PC PLEASANT PATH Sto1rm Water Detention Vault Snohomish County, Washington Structural Calculations for Permit Submittal 00 rn © rn OW\§@ Project No. S-08-072 .IJiN t. ·1 Z009 November 13, 2008 KC. D.D.E.S. 1051119r" Ave SE, Suite C, Everett, WA 98208 0 (425) 357-9600 (phone)+ (425) 357-9622 (fax) Pleasant Path Storm Water Detention Vault · Project No. S-07-072 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS INDEX Design Criteria Lid Review Wall & Footing Design Interior Wall Header Grate Beam and Top of Wall Reinf · Seismic Analysis Appendix A: Vehicle Loading Pre-cast Plank Section Properties & Load Charts Truck Live Load & Wall Pressure Charts 01 02 03-08 09-10 11-12 13-14 Al A2-A4 AS ,. DESIGN CRITERIA Code: Permitting Agency: Soil Cover: Lid Loading: Foundation Design: Pleasant Path Storm Water Detention Vault 2006 IBC King County l '-0" Minimum to 2'-6" Maximum · HS20-44 truck loading 150 psfuniform live load Uniform live load not to act concurrently with truck wheel loading. Foundation design is based on the following assumed values typical of soil types within this region. These values are to be verified by a geotechnical engineer or technician at the time of construction: Allowable Bearing Pressure: 3,000 psf Lateral Earth Pressures on Vault Walls: At Rest Condition: 50 pcfEFW (Drained Level Backfill) Active Condition: 35 pcfEFW (Drained Level Backfill) Seismic Addition: E = 20H psfUniform .· • Passive Soil Resistance: · Coefficient of Base Friction: Saturated Soil Density: IBC Soil Classification: Material Requirements: 250 pcfEFW (F.S. = 1.5) 0.35 (F.S. ~ 1.5) 125 pcf D Rebar: Concrete: Grade 60 fc= 3000 psi Lid: Pre-cast, Pre-stressed Hollow Core Plank .12-1/2" thick. CD /l-{:,-O'fi 'SITE STRUCTURES Project PLEASANT PATH 10511 19th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 PRECAST HOLLOW CORE PLANK REVIEW · Lid Data Soil Desity Soil Cover depth over lid Plank design clear span Design Uniform Live Load Design Superimposed Load · "w,.:125 pcf ' 1 1, .. 1·1[1",lil'.,'!.i.,l~III / r ,;;,;2;5.ft . )id :.},}'2'[: ft ,,,,, "11' -~-?Jh.:,,,bf!l4t ,:itt:;,.,,.,: .,159. psf 462,5 psf Plank capacity based on uniform superimposed load tables see appendix A sheet A4 for load span tables Plank span No of tendons Allowable superimposed loads Allowable superimposed loads base of design span of Based on flexural capacity Based on shear capacity Plank capacity based on truck load charts see appendix A sheets A2 & A3 for load span chart Plank span No of tendons Allowable soil cover without knee-walls Allowable soil cover with knee-walls 21.25 ft sheet z.: ------- date //-/3-o'i! prJ. no. S-08-072 • 6§6, psf / 498 psf / ,. SITE STRUCTURES 1051119th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 Project PLEASANT PATH Vault Walls -Lateral Pressures Review Minimum soil cover depth to top of wall: Maximum soil cover depth to top of wall: Wall Height: At-Rest soil pressure: Active soil pressure: Uniform Addition to At-Rest soil pressure: Soil Density: Load Combinations: ..-:--lc,,St;"-J1''"'J::.'!7'"•~" '•c ,:::,·,t"'· ,.,,,1,6 L (soil pressure)+ ,~·fi •-T '. "F;")"" • ,;,,:c, .>1.6 L (soil pressure)+ Due to HS20 Truck Loading: 1 :o ft min cover over lid: 2.5 ft max cover over lid: Total Factored Lateral Force: 1.6 ft min cover over lid: 2.5 ft max cover over lid: Due to Uniform Surcharge Load: Uniform surcharge: Equivalent lateral force: Total Factored Lateral Force: 2.5 ft max cover over lid: Due to Seismic Activity: Uniform seismic addition: E = Seismic lateral force: Total Factored Lateral Force: 2.5 ft max cover over lid: Combined Load Factor: · !,:.~ ,6 L (surcharge/wheel load) ' Jt+,i"t , '·1 ,0 L (seismic) (see appendix A5) "'i, ' ')."145 psf Uniform '.'Jl}','~"i 1' ,.,;.,,.,!);I, / • 1, ,~11,:::' ·ti,a5 psi Uniform" 5190 plf 5370 plf ";)>'If,-,'"'-·-f ·,,t:1§Q ps · qO psi Uniform 5070 plf ,:-r{:::2'b H .. ".-'·'"""""'' 150 psi Uniform 41.70 plf 1.'14 sheet: date: prJ. no. //-/.3-08' S-08-072 ,. SITE STRUCTURES 10511 19th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 Desi n Data Soil Density Soil Cover depth to the top of the wall Wall height Soil Pressure EFW Surcharge Information Project PLEASANT PATH 125 pcf 3.5 ft/ 7.5 ft 50 pcf Ws1 = Ws2= sheet 1 --'---- date //-13-os- prJ. no. S-08-072 175 psf 375. psf uniform S1 = 150 psf (on surface of ground) Equiv Ws = 60 psf truck Ws = 85 psf ( on surface of wall -see design chart ) Critical Design Surcharge pressure = Calculated Design Forces 85 psf (on the surface of the wall) W1= 260 W2= 375 F1 = 1950 lbs "F2 = 1406.25 lbs M1 = 1828 M2 = 1353 M total= 3181 ft-lbs Wall Reinforcing Wall thickness Clear Cover Rebar Size Rebar Area Bar spacing Rebar strength fy= cone strength fc = Load Factor = Anchorage at Top of the Wall ,. Ru= Shear capacity of Dowel = Bearing capacity of Dowel = 8 inches 1.5 inches 5 0.31 sq-in 12 inches 60 ksi 3000 psi 1.6 2310 plf < ,,- 3720 plf 2625 plf/ · Assume comp block= Depth to CL of bar= d-a/2 = calc comp block= phi Mn= Mu= Rebar Dowel Size = Dowel Area= Dowel strength fy= Dowel Spacing = Dowel brg length = cone strength fc = Anchorage at Bottom of the Wall Ru= Nominal Shear friction capacity of the footing to wall Dowel 3060 plf~ ,... 9486 plf Rebar Dowel Size = Dowel Area= Dowel strength fy= Dowel Spacing = Coefficient of friction = R top= R bot= 1444 lbs 1913 lbs 0.61 inches 6.19 inches 5.88 inches 0.61 inches 8208 ft-lbs 5090 ft-lbs 5 0.31 sq-in 60 ksi r' / :;tl:§Q.. z.4''~ V!JU-7V -t,1D. 011,h,LS 24 inches . · 2 inch"es 3000 psi 5 0.31 sq-in 60 ksi 12 inches -tJ: 5"€-/Z, ''<>It. w#t,'-TO FTO- !A:1Wif U 0.6 smooth surface 'SITE STRUCTURES 10511 19th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 Project PLEASANT PATH Vault Walls • Lateral Pressures Review Minimum soil cover depth to top of wall: Maximum soil cover depth to top of wall: Wall Height: At-Rest soil pressure: Active soil pressure: Uniform Addition to At-Rest soil pressure: Soil Density: Load Combinations: ~11,~·.,.e;"..-• .,..s ; ,iii 'i,-.iiiiJJ.1§_ L (soil pressure) + , ''),, ; :· i),.~--i L (surcharge/wheel load) · ':, ·"</;t_6 L (soil pressure)+ , ' 'l{1.0 L (seismic) Due to HS20 Truck Loading: · fo ft min cover over lid: 2.5 ft max cover over lid: Total Factored Lateral Force: 1.0 ft min cover over lid: 2.5 ft max·cover over lid: Due to Uniform Surcharge Load: Uniform surcharge: Equivalent lateral force: Total Factored Lateral Force: 2.5 ft max cover over lid: (see appendix A5) ::.'.t (~'.j,g§: psf Uniform · ,. \, , q5' psi Uniform 10250 plf 10?50 plf o''lt'., :'·,-_ ·1···5"0· f ,--, " . ps "" -- 0 60 psf Uniform/ 10950 plf Due to Seismic Activity: Uniform seismic addition: E = fl) ,I·'-. ::20 H Seismic lateral force: . , ,,_,. '2.so' psf Uniform Total Factored Lateral Force: ?,5 ft max cover over lid: Combined Load Factor: 9959 plf 1,41 sheet: date: 5 //-/3·0~ prJ. no. S-08-072 Project PLEASANT PATH sheet date 6 11-13-o?r 0 SITE STRUCTURES 1051119thAveSE, SuiteC Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 prJ. no. S-08-072 Desi n Data Soil Density Soil Cover depth to the top of the wall Wall height Soil Pressure EFW Surcharge Information Ws1 = Ws2= 175 psf 625 psf uniform truck S1 = :r;i;;•;;;::U,g' psf (on surface of ground) Equiv Ws = .-~ ,.,.,i,,.'lt.,,.,.r . 60 psf Ws =: • ;:":\'§~ psf ( on surface of wall -see design chart) Critical Design Surcharge pressure =t' •;.,"::':,/\,§0 psf (cin the surface of the wall) .-- Calculated Design Forces W1= 235 W2= 625 F1 = 2937.5 lbs F2 = 3906.25 lbs R top= R bot= 2771 lbs 4073 lbs M1 = 4590 M2 = 6265 M total= 10854 ft-lbs Wall Reinforcing Wall thickness )M:~i f:J,Q, inches Clear Cover ',,.,,,1,:.,:2, inches Rebar Size t•i,M<t"J? 'J.r'"i_i .. ,1,0,sm Rebar Area ';; ~l '.Q,g, sq-i~ Bar spacing ·: ·•: \(1!f 2. inches Rebar strength fy= ,"C: ·· .. '. '601 ksi cone strength fc = 1,,,1}~9g§l psi Load Factor= ''-'•c'-' 1.6 , .. r;., -., ., Anchorage at Top of the Wall Ru= Shear capacity of Dowel = Bearing capacity of Dowel = 4433 plf /' 7200 plf r 4594 plf' · Anchorage at Bottom of the Wall Ru = .6517 plf / Nominal Shear friction capacity of the footing to wall Dowel 13464 plf" ,r. L "''-" :L> -~·•-1' Assume comp block=:" i'I. :, ·:tm.11, inches Depth to CL of bar= 7.56 inches d-a/2 = 6.97 inches calc comp block = phi Mn= Mu= 1.18 inches 18831 ft-lbs ,,,-- ...--- 17367 ft-lbs Rebar Dowel Size='' ;,,}iji:;Z Dowel Area = ,,: : •)i'· JO. -~ •. sq-in · , ·: ,T• ,c ", 'i'fi,~,1t1:rl,S"t1 Dowel strength fy= . ,t1u.,,:;..60, ksi a,,•, L .... -~~. Dowel Spacing = ·• ,:i,:,;tg,j, inches Dowel brg length=,. :: , .. ,,,,2.,5 inches -·:' fa,,iitr:.ti .. cone strength re = ''. ,,,,'),';3Q.9Q psi Rebar Dowel Size = Ht ·' :;· "'' 6 , , '-" ' •''!:i-"' ·n~ Dowel Area = , , tc/'4 ti: 0.44 sq-in '''.' _.,ff.,_ --··."'"91'" Dowel strength fy= ,; ;#( ::1~6 ksi :¥;"""'· Dowel Spacing = . · 'i:\,,, .. :1tg inches Coefficient of friction = ' /F c .Q,q smooth surface 0 SITE STRUCTURES Project PLEASANT PATH sheet date prJ. no. 10511 19th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 Design Data : Wall Foundation Loads Analysis Soil Desity Soil Cover over the lid Plank weight Uniform Live Load Truck Rating Wall Height · ,'lij.:,-:, 1::r.$0 psf <i...,:.·. -:,i;. t 1 s. o. psf t,a, -,1.,;i.,ia,•c,,,-.,r ~.%,'.H$2,0'44 12.5 ft~ '' Per. wall Cell Width Int wall Cell Width left Int wall Cell Width right Front Axle Load Rear Axle #1 Load Rear Axle #2 Load Total vehicle wt r,;;,"fa666 lbs ;'~'32ooo' lbs f_:,-t.,.-.,,_==-"": c::,~32000Jbs 72000 lbs Truck Wheel Load Distribution to Perimeter Wall Foundation 7 IJ-L3-o~ S-08-072. Truck Perpendicular to the perimeter wall wl rear axle #2 directly over wall & distance to axle #1 = 14ft · total truck load to wall = 42667 lbs distribution width = 38 ft Load @ base of wall = 1123 plf Truck Parallel to the perimeter wall wl one wheel over wall & 2nd wheel on plank (incl axle 1 &2 only/ total truck load to wall = $4857 lbs calc distribution width= 46 ft Load@ base of wall= 1193 plf Truck Wheel Load Distribution to Interior Wall Foundation Truck Perpendicular to the int. wall wl rear axle #2 centered over the wall & dist between axles = 14ft toial truck load to wall = 3733~ lbs distribution width = · 38 ft Load @ base of wall = 982 plf Truck Perpendicular to the interior wall wl rear axle #2 directly over wall & distance to axle #1 = 14ft total truck load to wall = · 42667 lbs left plank Load @ base of wall = 11'23 plf total truck load to wall = 32000 lbs right plank Load @ base of wall = 842 plf distribution width = 38 ft Truck Parallel to the interior wall wl one wheel over wall & 2nd wheel on plank (incl axle 1 &2 only / total truck load to wall= 54857 lbs left plank Load@ base of wall= · 1193 plf total truck load to wall = 50?86 lbs right plank Load @ base of wall = 1093 plf disiribution width = 46 ft Truck Parallel to the interior wall wl the truck centered over the wall (incl axle 1 &2 only / total truck load to wall = distribution width = 52571 lbs 46 ft Uniform Live Load distribution to Wall Footings Perimeter Wall Interior Wall 1575 plf ,-, 2625 plf ,,,- Load @ base of wall = 1143 plf ·slTE STRUCTURES 1051119th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 Project PLEASANT PATH sheet date prj. no. Design Data : Wall Foundation Design Allowable Bearing Pressure , iww;;,}36,oo: psf / Rebar strength fy = 1 ·:;>,, i:u;f/YM. ksi ''r'"-:-.'\""•.,,:~ Concrete strength = . r,{,,:0,\1:, , 3QQ9 · psi Soil Desity Soil Cover over the lid 125 pcf 2.5 ft Perimeter Wall Footing Design Design live load Soil Cover dead load Plank dead load Wall dead load total dead load 3542 plf 1020 plf 1562.5 plf 6124 plf Total live+ dead Load 7699 plf 2.57 ft Required Fig Width Selected Fig Width As regd = Asmin = Qu =. 1.33 x As regd = :~:: _. t A:·;:~'.~tiit tt 3696 psf 0.03 sq-in/ft 0.43 sq-in/ft 0.04 sq-in/ft Mu= Vu= phi Vn= · Interior Wall Footing Design Design live load Soil Cover dead load Plank dead load Wall dead load total dead load 5468.75 plf 1575 plf 1562.5 plf 8606.25 plf Total live + dead Load 11231.25 plf 3.74 ft Required Ftg Width Selected Fig Width Qu = As regd = Asmin = 1.33 xAs regd = 3793 psf 0.09 sq-in/ft 0.43 sq-in/ft 0.12 sq-in/ft Mu= Vu= phi Vn= Per. wall Cell Width Int. wall Cell Width left Int. wall Cell Width right Plank weight Wall Height Wall Thickness L.F 1.6 1.2 1.2 1.2 Wu 2520 plf 4250 plf 1224 plf 1875 plf 7349 plf 9869 plf Selected Ftg Thickness 1559 ft-lbs 3394 plf 11732 plf L.F 1.6 1.2 1.2 1.2 at face of wall at face of wall · at face of wall Wu · 4200 plf 6562.5 plf 1890 plf 1875 plf 10327.5 plf 14527.5 plf Selected Ftg Thickness 4258 ft-lbs 5683 plf 11732 plf at face of wall at face of wall at face of wall 1/-/3-1)5' S-08-072 21 ft 21 ft 14 ft 90 psf 12.5 ft 10 inches A , ... :s -=-, 21"-l.fr !iiTE STRUCTURES 10511 19th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 Project PLEASANT PATH INTERIOR WALL HEADER GEOMETRY AND LOADS ANALYSIS Header Overburden & Uniform Loads Lid weight Soil Desity Soil Cover depth over lid Plank design clear span left Plank design clear span right Design Uniform Live Load Lid tributary width to header Uniform service load to header Uniform factore.d load to header Truck Wheel Loads to Header Truck type .Axle Load . Wheel Spacing Cover depth 17.5 ft 9669 plf . 12653 plf Axle assumed centered over & perpendicular to header sheet Cf ------- date J/-/3-o'B' prj. no. S-08-072 Load Factors distribution width distribution length 5.50 ft 12.00 ft opening width ' li'!,;ffl'QQ ft - uniform load @ top of plank wheel load to header from left span wheel load to header from right span Total wheel load to header Factored wheel load to header Design Loads & Forces in Header Service Factored· Critical section for shear is at Design Vu= Design Mu= · 485 psf 2494 plf 2286 plf 4779 plf 7647 plf 14.4 kif 20.3 kif length ea side of hdr 6.00 ft 1.5 feet from the face of the support 71 k 254 k-ft ... Project PLEASANT PATH sheet date to. //-/3-0B' SITE STRUCTURES 1051119th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 prj. no. S-08-072 INTERIOR WALL HEADER DESIGN Header Data 8 inches Concrete Strength 3000 psi Header width Header span Header depth ln/d ratio 10.00ft ~ 30 inches / d = ( 27.00\inches Min shear steel ( Area I spacing ) ratio · Max spacing of shear steel Min horiz steel ( Area / spacing ) ratio Max spacing of horzontal steel Review shear capacity of header Reinforcing yield strength Shear reinforcing area spacing Reinf shear capacity <!>Vs Total Shear Capacity Max <l>Vn @ ln/d < 2 4.44 Deep Beam limit ln/d < 5:0-· · 0.012 Min Rebar spacing 60 ksi 0.31 sq in 6 in 57 k 78 k/ 80 k ·6 inches #3@ 9.17 #4@ 16.67 0.02 10 inches #4@ #5@ 10.00 15.50 Horz reinf area 0.31 sq in· Horz reinf spacing 12 in Cone shear capacity <!>Ve 20 k Factored shear Vu 71 k ,,,,- Max <l>Vn @ 2 < ln/d < 5 10814 k Review flexural capacity of header min As based on 200 bwd/fy min As based on eq 10-3 0. 72 sq inches 0.59 sq inches As reqd based on bending model 2.26 sq inches As reqd based on tie -strut model assume Vu is focused @ the center of the header then Tu= .. 157.88 k As reqd = 2.92 sq inches (5) -1J.7 N,R5 'l;;JTE STRUCTURES 1051119th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 Project PLEASANT PATH Beam Design Below Grated Opening Design Data Height of Curb: Curb Thickness: Soil Density: Beam Width: Beam Span: Truck Rear Axle Load: Calculated Design Forces Soil Weight = Curb Weight= Self Weight = Wheel Load= Load Factor: 729 plf 250 plf . 469 plf 16000 lb Wu= 1738 plf Pu= 25600 lb Design for Flexure Reinf Size # of Top & Bot Reinf Area of Steel Depth to Reinf (d) Comp Block (a) d -a/2 3.53 sq-in ' ,,;, ~'¥! 10.13 in ?.31 in 8.97 in . / Cl>Mn = 142658 ft-lbs Mu= Design for Shear Tie Reinf Size · Area of Steel Depth to Reinf (d) Max Spacing Reinf Spacing ·:.;·:~:u;r1, 0.20 10.50 5.25 in i:~1iJ1W;(§ in Cl>Vc = 17598 lbs Cl>Vs = 42057 lbs Cl>Vc +Cl>Vs = 59655 lbs / Vu= u :c )Q 132169 ft-lbs --- / 37763 lbs sheet: I/ date: /1-/3-o?i prj. no. S-08-072 • SITE STRUCTURES 1051119th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 Project Reinforcing at Top of Wall Below Grated Opening Design Data · Top of Footing to Inside Top of Vault (H1) Top of Footing to Finished Grade (H2) Soil Pressure EFW Controlling Lateral Surcharge Grating Span SURCHARGE SOIL PRESSURE W52 WSI -·-----+-- Calculated Design Forces Fbot of curb = Fbotofwall = 13$ plf 81Q plf Mwa11 uolform = 12302 ft-lbs Mwa11 tnangle = 16276 ft-lbs Wall Reinforcing Mu horz curb = cpMncurb = Mbase of wall= R= Mu horzwall = curb height curb horz reinf bar curb horz rein! spacing depth to center of rein! curb thickness 3308 ft-lbs 5107 ft-lbs 28578 ft-lbs 2~86 plf 89629 ft-lbs Addi H R . f""'''"'-'·:i•t"•c, orz ern '1'1~·· r.,J,!e.·.rl.~ ... );.lm., .. "' ... '·.~ .. i :::!if'"' J;.f,' ·ii ·~·l:i,.il<<· .• # of Addi Bars 1 ){'1,1;;:~. "!~~;§ sheet: date: prJ. no. /!-/3-o'if '2 -!~· t(h- Ws1 = 750 Ws2 = 60 curb self-supported As@ Top of Wall 3.61 sq-in Cl>Mn = 94775 ft-lbs depth to reinf ( d) comp block (a) d -a/2 Mu= 6.69 in 4.84 in h 4.27 in 89620 ft-lbs Conterminous 48 States 2003 NEHRP Seismic Design Provisions Zip Code= 98059 Spectral Response Accelerations SDs and SDI SDs = 2/3 x SMs and SDI= 2/3 x SM! Site Class D Period (sec) 0.2 1.0 Period (sec) 0.2 1.0 Period (sec) 0.2 1.0 Centroid Sa (g) 0.915 · (SDs) 0.476 (SDI) Maximum Sa (g) 0.964 0.496 (SDs) i/..,..,... (SDI) vc Minimum Sa (g) 0.857 (SDs) 0.453 (SDI) @ l/·13·0'8' \ • SITE STRUCTURES Project PLEASANT PATH sheet: date: 11 1051119th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 Vault Seismic Analysis v Vault Length = L ' I I PLAN Vault Width =W Vault Le~9th. 77 .3 " .Soll Density. ,-- Vault Width: 37 ft Wall Thickness: - Soil Cover: 2.5 ft Number of Cells: Structure Dead Load Tributary to the Lid: Weight of Soil Weight of Lid Weight of Walls Total Structure Dead Load: Seismic Review: Site Zip Code: I BC Site Class: 98059 D 894 k 257 k 258 k Design Spectral Response Accel (Sds): Response Modification Factor: 1.2(Sds)/R = 0.289 V= Shear distributed over 90% of shortest length . of wall (d assumed to be 90% of vault width): V = 6.12 kif ,,.-- <l>vc + <!>vs = 32.41 kif / ))-/3·08 prj. no. S-08-072 Average Soil Cover Depth = sc 111-111 SECTION Wall f.e,ght h. ' Wall Height =h la.5~ fc:. 12:; pcf 10 in 2 Vert Reinf: _,.- Vert Reinf Spacing: ~ 7 fy: 12 "o/c 1409 k 0.964 ....- 4.0 for Ordinary Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls • 408 k Shear capacity of concrete: <l>vc = 9.86 kif Shear capacity of reinforcing: <!>vs = 22.55 kif 3000 psi 60 ksi • ~ SITE STRUCTURES Project PLEASANT PATH sheet 1051119th Ave SE, Suite C date Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 prJ. no. HS20-44 TRUCK LOADING HS20-44 72,000 LBS Front Axle: ~1 I 8,000 LBS ·~ • in ~ Rear Axle #1: 111 I 111 I 32,000 LBS 0 • 0 «'> 0 1,-, ,:,; 0 '. ,t- ! Rear Axle #2: ill 111 32,000 LBS i ··~, ,l I.. 14' , IE v= 11• to 30' :-I· 8,000 lb HS20-4.4 32,000 lb 32,000•lb a,;le 6.000 lb KSl5•44 24,000 lb 24,000-lb axle 1t -~ fl. . -1 Some o·s eor,espondin9 # 0 :1w ¥ 0.4W~ H-1rvck W = coniblned weigh! of fm two o,les V • vorio\rle, 11Se spacing 1"hidl produces mo•imum stress For desiqn of smbs, eenterl1ne of wheel to be I ft from curb Al Jl·l.3·08 S-08-072 ~ SITE STRUCTURES Project PLEASANT PATH sheet date A2 10511 19th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 /l·/3-CZ prj. no. S-08-072 --------- ___ c-o_N_C_R_E_J_E~I-EC_H_N-O_L-0-G_Y_c_o~R-P_o-R_A~I-IO~N~--. 12112" HOLLOW CORE SLAB HS20-44 12 I 11 ~\ ', 1 ~) K ~ 1' -~· q 10 z ::> LL 9 0 D.. ) " ·. \ f;,, -- \t"W·-.. :·· ) -·- ·.\ 0 N 8 ~ II l:::! ~,· L {# = Number of Filled Voids required -\ K' -for 2'-0" at each end of each Slab. 2 .\ . . ~ a ., 7 b i=- !!::. 6 0:: w ~ 5 0 ' ' y. )1 I I I_ _., -,-----· ·-----e----··-------- ' \ I Vent NotchP \ ', ' ~ . -~ ,J-' ' ---~-.. --- ' ' V , H11 Strands ' ~ '<; ' '\. .:·J\, ,,. 11 Strands (y 5001 = 125 pcf) -~ -=--=....=-= \ :!,. l ·. ,/ / 1 ·1 Strands (Yson = 135 pcf) I ..J 5 4 (J) LL 0 I-3 :c (!) jjj 2 :c ~ '', ') , -t" ..__p,._ ,. "' ... ]'' .. ;,. ....... ~ ' .... ~.~ -f, ' Jg' .¢-t'--.... ~ rs-.' -.:· ~ - / ~ -N 'J:' ~ . rs-. I • .. :. ~ '--Knee ........ .....,. ~ Wall 3 -=-~ ,-...... .. ... ~-.... · .. I I-I ' ,...._ ,__f''' •.-;--; I I I 0 I I I ., I I I I I I . . . . 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 SIMPLE SPAN (ft) GENERAL NOTES; 1.} A minimum cover depth of six inches OR a three inch thick cast in place concrete topping slab is required. 2.) Simple Span is center1ine of bearing to centerline of bearing. 3.) The Knee Wall envelope represents the maximum span and height of soil cover that can be supported by slabs with standard notches for manhole openings, assuming void fill concrete fc = 3,000 psi. Points falling outside this envelope require knee walls to support the slabs at manhole openings. 4.) Interpolation between strand contours is acceptable. 00 NOT extrapolate beyond the bounds of this chart 5.) Soil cover is assumed to be uniform. 6.) Except as noted, soil cover unit weight is assumed to be 120 pcf. 7.) Minimum span length= 14'-0". 8.) The values shown on this chart are in compliance with IBC 2003·& ACI 318-05. · 9.) The Vent Notch envelope represents the maximum span and height of soil cover that can be supported by slabs with 614" standard notches in adjacent slabs to accommodate 12" diameter vents, assuming void fill concrete fc = 3,000 psi. Refer to Detail 3 on page 15 of this brochure for vent notch details. · 1/5/07 MANUFACTURERS OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE • TACOMA, WASHINGTON 7 ... SITE STRUCTURES sheet A3 Project PLEASANT PATH --------- 10511 19th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 date )/-/3-0% prj: no. S-08-072 __ ----:C..:.O=N~Ca::.1,;RllJaE.uJE.._T.u.·E~C"-.1.H.LLN..:O~L O..:.G~X~C~O..:.RwF~O~RA.;Ji.J.u.l O~N!...--liui 12%" HOLLOW CORE SLAB d z ::i L1. u a. ls! ... II -' 0 " c 150 PSF 12 ~~~1~~,~~~~~~.~~.~~~-1 ~~~~I~~~~~~ 1 Vent Notch9 ' ~ 4 J I 11 I-\ •• ) +tl*\\1--+-+-f+-1--l--1---l-l---l-1--l-l---l-l-+-1-+-l-1--1-1 ~ 3 { '# = Number of Filled Voids required -' r \ ... ~.-.. ~, '~~.t--1-t--1 _, ~ ~\- 1 \.~~ for 2'-0" at each end of each slab. 10 9 8 · 2 -p i;;. , -C-i-1---1--1---<--+--l--+--+--+-1- '-'l '" ·.~ .....1-1~1-s-,~ra_n_d'--s-' ~A ~~~--~~-~/-,-+.~~~±~~HH-1-++rH I'-~ \.'· ~ ,f11 Strands (y~,....__=~12::::5:_.:p::::c'.!.f)_,1++-f-t-i-+-f-H 6 \--~-~ --~'.:ly;··, --=i=Il ...... 1...i.l __ 1.cL_ .J...-1--+-1-----1--+--1-' \L~ / 11 Sl{ands (y •• ,, = 135 pct) \ 7 5 \. \ -....J~i: :l"~"-,:--!-..+--l--t---1--1--~l--l-+-1--l---l--+--I-'-,,.N ·.J~ I N.::.'.~ 4 . --l--4--P"-+1'.-1-1.1-P ... .,.-.1,, 1 ~:-.-:.-N'~~:"'.~--1--1--1-rg,-1--1--1--1--1--1--1--1--~-1---1 I I I'-. 'IL , "/ 3 · -Knee ~ . -lli 77'1-lf--t'-c'!,_,1· <;').~+-+-+-+-1--+--l--+-l-+--l-- 3 I t'-"' ""' ... · .~io.... tl, ' ~... ....... ,:-~ 2 .. 1-1--1---1--l--t--+---l-1-~ ~ . '' · I ,I '~ r--·· :, I o 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 SIMPLE SPAN (ft) GENERAL NOTES; 1.) A minimum cover depth of six i~ches OR a three inch thick cast in place concrete topping slab is required. 2.) Simple Span is centerline of bearing to centertine of bearing. 3.) The Knee Wall envelope represents the maximum span and height of soil cover that can be supported by slabs with standard notches for manhole openings, assuming void fill concrete fc = 3,000 psi. Points falling outside this envelope require knee walls to support the slabs at manhole openings. 4.) Interpolation between strand contours is acceptable. DO NOT extrapolate beyond the bounds of this chart. 5.) Soil cover is assumed to be uniform. 6.) Except as noted, soil cover unit weight is assumed to be 120 pct. 7.) Minimum span length= 14'-0". 8.) The values shown on this chart are in compliance with IBC 2003 & ACI 318-05. 9.) The Vent Notch envelope represents the maximum span and height of soil cover that can be supported by slabs with 6%· standard notches in adjacent slabs to accommodate 12· diameter vents, assuming void fill concrete fc = 3,000 psi. Refer to Detail 3 on page 15 of this brochure for vent notch details. 1/5/07 MANUFACTURERS OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE • TACOMA, WASHINGTON 9 .. •' i1TE STRUCTURES 1051119th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 Project PLEASANT PATH sheet A4 ------- date J/·/3·o?> PIJ. no. S-08-072 ----,---- ___ C_O ___ N--'C __ RE--'TE..,....TE...;..C ___ H __ N;._O_LOG--'.-~_C_O...;._R_PO.........;....RAJI_O..;.;...· .,.._N _____ _ 121/2 11 HOLLOW CORE SLAB DIMENSIONS FOR DETAILING •• 11i,':a• 3'-101/2" . . 11'/2" •• 111,,· 11v~· ... :-.i. I __ ,. _ 1111:1:-: 3•.i,7/11". ··c4•.o·~~Wfc;tlnJ SPAN-LOAD TABLE A,L~()WA,13LE SUPERi!.!POSED ~()A,~ In pour\~~ per sq~~ .... fc,ot Effective NO.of SIMPLE SPAN i~ i~~. Prestress 112;.· a (!OPS) STRANDS 28 32 36 40 44 48 !i2 56 Bil .. . . ·.· 70.7 3 78 44 20 .77.7 4 126 80 49 26 101,3 5 174 117 78 50 .27 124.8 6 ?21 153 106 70 43 23' 148.4 7 267 186 129 89 59 36 172.0 8 307 216 153 108 74 49 29 . 195.5 9 343 243 .174 i25 89 61 40 23• 219,1 ~ ! 378'! 270 195 142 103 73 50 31• 242.7 11 4131 297 217 160 1_17 85 60 40 ?.4* SECTION PROPERTIES (with shear key!) grouted) . 12 A =.:i13 ln2 .I =6138 In• Zt ·= 1019 In' Y1 "6.02 In . zb =947.ln' · Yb a 6.413 In NOTES: -1. Thii Vaiues given In tlila table Me based_on hollow core slabS ~ui st,ear relr,farcement. Sup_erseripts_ (1, 2, etc.) foHc,wing value$ ln_tha tab.I~ lndicaie thit_number of fl tied VO!ds ri,quli'&d at t~ ~cfs of Slabs to d&\felbp lhe alloWable Sl:-IPSrtinP~.se~ lo~d: S1:1_G p~ge 2, ~SHEAR'.'. f~r 4\SCuS,irii_on. · . · 2. As1e·r1sk (1 fotlOOlriQ va1ues In the table lnd1C.it8 th.al the tcital d8flecilon under an loads 1s greater thari LJ3SO but less than' Lheo. · · · · · · · · · · -· -· · 3. 1nterpo1llt1o_n between va1lJes 19 acceptable. Do not mctrapolate values Into the blank_ spaces of the table. -4, Th&S8 ·span~Lo_Sd Tabl&S are int8n_ded a!I an aid to p'relilTll!"lafY sizln"g. Sot.incl el'\glneering Judgellierit ls required for th8 apprrc8trori O_f this lriformatiori to speciflC i:t~Sigii CeseS. MANUFACTUR~RS OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE • TACOMA, WASHINGTON •' .. SITE STRUCTURES •. 10511 19th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 Project PLEASANT PATH sheet date AS /1-/3-0'if prJ. no. S-08-072 HS 20 -44 TRUCK LIVE LOAD ON WALLS -.. -oio,.;. -.. 8 LL 6 . a:: w > 0 u 4 2 0 --,~ . . .. . . .. , 0 16K 16K. 6' ,. . . .· .. HS20-44 LOADING . 7':2'; tall waiis . --, ~ 1 ',0" rninirrium cover: ... .. 145 psf uniform r,-,-I . ' . .· . .~ 2',6" inaxiinuin cover: i \ . 85 psi uniiorm -' . -.. ·.·· ' 12'-6'' tall walls ,-',-,, \ \ 1 '-0" minimum cover: ,\ .. -. ,,-... ' 100 psf uniform . '. ·. ; ',-'- \\ \ \ ,-;.-, \ \' ' 2'-6" maximum cover: ' 55 psf uniform --'-\' \ \ '\ ' \ ., .. '\ \ \ ,\ \. '\· x~ ... . . - \ 'x .. " . • " fl/. ' . \ I\ \ +. ~e. " .... ....... '-' .. 1 \ ' . " .'-. ... ..... -~ ,,. . ' ....... ' .. ·' ' ' ......,_ :---... .. " " ' ""-.. \~ '\,;_ 0-' . ......... ........ "-- \ '\ i'\.. ..... ......., ...... -....... ... ' . ioo .. 400 2 )0 300 AVERAGE UNIFORM HORIZONTAL LOAD __ ,;_ s _,__:_ _________ _ ·· SITE STRUCTURES I A Division of Kosnik Engineering, PC PLEASANT PATH Storm Water Detention Va ult Snohomish County, Washington ~~@~OW~@ ,IAN t 7 W09 K.C. 0.0.E.~. Structural Calculations for Permit Submittal Project No. S-08-072 November 13, 2008 1051119TH Ave SE, Suite C, Everett, WA 98208 ¢ (425) 357-9600 (phone)~ (425) 357-9622 (fax) Pleasant Path Storm Water Detention Vault · Project No. S-07-072 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS INDEX Design Criteria Lid Review Wall & Footing Design Interior Wall Header Grate Beam and Top of Wall Reinf Seismic Analysis Appendix A: Vehicle Loading Pre-cast Plank Section Properties & Load Charts Truck Live Load & Wall Pressure Charts 01 02 03-08 09-10 11-12 13-14 Al A2-A4 AS " Pleasant Path Storm Water Detention Vault DESIGN CRITERIA Code: Permitting Agency: Soil Cover: Lid Loading: Foundation Design: 2006 IBC King County l '-0" Minimum to 2'-6" Maximum HS20-44 truck loading 150 psfuniform live load Uniform live load not to act concurrently with truck wheel loading. Foundation design is based on the following assumed values typical of soil types within this region. These values are to be verified by a geotechnical engineer or technician at the time of construction: Allowable Bearing Pressure: 3,000 psf ' Lateral Earth Pressures on Vault Walls: . At Rest Condition: 50 pcfEFW (Drained Level Backfill) Active Condition: 35 pcfEFW (Drained Level Backfill) Seismic Addition: E = 20H psfUniform Passive Soil Resistance: 250 pcfEFW (F.S. =c 1.5) Coefficient of Base Friction: 0.35 (F.S. = 1.5) Saturated Soil Density: 125 pcf IBC Soil Classification: D Material Requirements: Rebar: Concrete: Lid: Grade 60 fc= 3000 psi Pre-cast, Pre-stressed Hollow Core Plank 12-1/2" thick. 0 'SITE STRUCTURES 1051119th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 Project PLEASANT PA TH PRECAST HOLLOW CORE PLANK REVIEW Lid Data Soil Desity Soil Cover depth over lid Plank design clear span Design Uniform Live ~cad Design Superimposed Load Plank capacity based on uniform superimposed load tables see appendix A sheet A4 for load span tables Plank span No of tendons Allowable superimposed loads Allowable superimposed loads base of design span of Based on flexural capacity Based on shear capacity Plank capacity based on truck load charts see appendix A sheets A2 & A3 for load span chart Plank span No of tendons Allowable soil cover without knee-walls Allowable soil cover with knee-walls 21.25 ft sheet 2-------- date //·/3-o'i prJ. no. S-08-072 \~1~ psf/ 1',i19a.·. psf ,...-"'·· ~·, • 'SITE STRUCTURES 1051119th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 Project PLEASANT PATH Vault Walls -Lateral Pressures Review Minimum soil cover depth to top of wall: Maximum soil cover depth to top of wall: Wall Height: .:ii2 ft/ •.. .,. . lj,'.F~ / ' · · ·. 3.5 ft I.,. , .. ,, ~; ' •.'..· ,;,,,,;-.·. sheet: :3 ------- date: /l-/.3-o'8: prJ. no. S-08-072 At-Rest soil pressure: :~ .. ;,·_~,_'..·· .. _.',-.. ·".: .. : ... ~''.7:5 ft r . ..-"l';';,'f'll.1!:.t; , · :,:-,· 50 pcf EFD ,..- ,,, ''-'-..l; 'ti',,,, ,-,, ' Active soil pressure: Uniform Addition to At-Rest soil pressure: Soil Density: Load Combinations: t:'r,:::· ''!'\:f's L (soil pressure) + :, ''· > · '((6 L (soil pressure)+ • it"! ·35 pcf EFD . -, ·C-'.f _,~r,:,:; , ,,e:·,.~i"· o psi ' ,I· J.t1.a.«~J :, ·gti,pcf, , ~ ,6 L (surcharge/wheel load) /{9' L (seismic) Due to HS20 Truck Loading: ·· · · ·1 :o ft min cover over lid: · ·f5 ft max cover over lid: (see appendix A5) Total Factored Lateral Force: · 1.0 ft min cover over lid: .. 2'.$ ft max cover over lid: Due to Uniform Surcharge Load: Uniform surcharge: Equivalent lateral force: Total Factored Lateral Force: , 2.!I ft max cover over lid: Due to Seismic Activity: ·i., \ '. 1{5 psi Uniform / i'· , , '11,-,ll,-. :, ·.-''t?~ psi Uniform /}5199 plf • .• 5370 pl( · ·,·,/ 0-,150 psf •:'[6 psi Uniform 5070 plf Uniform seismic addition: E = · ' Seismic lateral force: ,•::,20 H · \f~g psf Uniform Total Factored Lateral Force: . • ?,$ ft max cover over lid: Combined Load Factor: · ,417'0 plf 'i;ii44 'SITE STRUCTURES 10511 19th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 Project PLEASANT PATH Vault Walls -Lateral Pressures Review Minimum soil cover depth to top of wall: Maximum soil cover depth to top of wall: Wall Height: At-Rest soil pressure: Active soil pressure: :·:r~~·-·. -·· ··.•; ··-'.:!(l2 ft (""'" "=-:· : .. ,!' i·.:·" :,1x~l!:S' r . . , · : · · 3.5 ft • •.• '.·'"' ~."···~'!J<, / ·.:. · ',1.:0'12,5 ft/' • •. . . .;,~ ;,_, ~'t' .. ~~-:: . ' .:',:!,: ,:-.~\/ pcf EFD ' , ',},·.', ·;35 pcf EFD I.' i•":' '_'-c1p Uniform Addition to At-Rest soil pressure: • I., if,t. --~a· psf · · '•, ·1 '1 1.-.J,w fl'/./: .. '· ,:'. 1,125_ pcf Soil Density: Load Combinations: ·::r·;'~?TJ L (soil pressure)+ .· · · ·,;, r.$ L (soil pressure)+ , ·. L~, L (surcharge/whee\ .load) 'I° lO. L (seismic) Due to HS20 Truck Loading: · · 1.9· ft min cover over lid: · ·?,5 ft max cover over lid: Total Factored Lateral Force: 1.0 ft min cover over lid: .·'«'ifili. · ,:?,5 ft max·cover over lid: Due to Uniform Surcharge Load: Uniform surcharge: Equivalent lateral force: Total Factored Lateral Force: 2,5 ft max cover over lid: Due to Seismic Activity: Uniform seismic addition: Seismic lateral force: Total Factored Lateral Force: . ;' 2.5 ft max cover over lid: , --.,--, Combined Load Factor: (see appendix A5) ·' ' · .. · rn.Q psf Uniform , .' .§~ psf Uniform l92fi0 plf ,108§Q plf ',:•.i§Q. psf . ,' ·"§6 psf Uniform / 'U: •. 10950 plf E = \'"?-.. ' c,;;?,9, H · .\ •.: 2.50 psf Uniform ·. 9950 plf :. j s1>H sheet: 5 ------- date: //-/3-o~ prJ. no. S-08-072 "SITE STRUCTURES Project PLEASANT PATH 6 10511 19th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 sheet date 11-/3-0P/ prJ. no. S-08-072 Design Data Soil Density . t n.§ pcf . '; '.'>3.5 ft/ 175 psf 625 psf Soil Cover depth to the top of the wall Wall height :: 12:5 ft / Ws1 = Ws2= Soil Pressure EFW · · ".?~5 pcf Surcharge Information uniform truck S1 = ''T'~i-~9,_' psf (on surface of ground) Equiv Ws = '§0 psf Ws = \pg psf ( on surface of wall -see design chart) Critical Design Surcharge pressure = · · ·. • ·'jp psf (on the surface of the wall) .- Calculated Design Forces W1= 235 W2= 625 F1 = 2937.5 lbs R top= R bot= 2771 lbs 4073 lbs F2 = 3906.25 lbs M1 = 4590 M2 = 6265 M total= 10854 ft-lbs Wall Reinforcing Wall thickness '. i,;. ,i:1.9, inches Clear Cover ;;.;:ct:·. 2 inches Rebar Size t'.'~·l:i\iZL Rebar Area ·: '"\.,Q._§ sq-in Bar spacing , /~[12 inches Rebar strength fy= ,: ":: i:'sc5 ksi . ' ·1,h'i,,,;;.te,f'l- conc strength fc = ;,'' ;,~Q.Q9. psi Load Factor= ,,&)1l".'1.l;l Anchorage at Top of the Wall Ru = • ·44~:1 plf <"" Shear capacity of Dowel = Bearing capacity of Dowel = Anchorage at Bottom of the Wall Ru= Nominal Shear friction capacity of the footing to wall Dowel 6517 plf / 13,464 plf / Assume comp block = Depth to CL of bar= d-a/2 = calc comp block= phi Mn= Mu= : '1)1( inches 7.56 inches 6.97 inches 1.18 inches . 18831 ft-lbs / • , 17367 ft-lbs Rebar Dowel Size = ' .. ;) J{J'. Dowel Area= · ·,.::: ::.;o.6 sq-in . -.-. ,.,,,r,:c.:r.- Dowel strength fy= ,·· · ,: ,::.:,:;JIP ksi • ~. ,••, o,, .;,,J•.'.L, Dowel Spacing = · , ,, . : •:'{·24 inches ' ; . ,-.;,,;-;;;fp.; Dowel brg length = .. l>';JJ~ inches cone strength fc = : q.,.: .. ·, ~QOO psi Rebar Dowel Size = : •: · .. .. . 6 .J, 'L ·t·"'P;-_':'" • Dowel Area= .. :;;,,,.>.9,1j, sq-1n Dowel strength fy= , · ;, · ·; 'sci ksi Dowel Spacing= ·\ . .'1£,,CJ'J'g inches Coefficient of friction = · . •;, ·,_OJ, smooth surface • ,, 'SITE STRUCTURES Project PLEASANT PATH sheet date prJ. no. 1051119th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 Design Data : Wall Foundation Loads Analysis Soil Desity Soil Cover over the lid Plank weight Uniform Live Load Truck Rating Wall Height :;})<.,\:{~~~'ti~Qs psf -. ,;,e HS20i,44 12.5 ft /' Per. wall Cell Width Int. wall Cell Width left Int. wall Cell Width right Front Axle Load Rear Axle #1 Load Rear Axle #2 Load Total vehicle wt cL\tLlIS!P.2., lbs d":1'32000"' lbs ·j ,l·"·,.,~-sw1',sWrn:! rS!i:32000" lbs 72000 lbs Truck Wheel Load Distribution to Perimeter Wall Foundation 7 /J-1.3-08 S-08-072 Truck Perpendicular to the perimeter wall wl rear axle #2 directly over watt & distance to axle #1 = 14ft total truck load to wall = ' '::f?.~~Z lbs distribution width = ., '>fa ft Load @ base of wall = 11.?~ plf Truck Parallel to the perimeter watt wl one wheel over watt & 2nd wheel on plank (incl axle 1 &2 only/ total truck load to wall = "'"''-'.'.~t~!if lbs calc distribution width = · '. \ . 46 ft Load @ base of wall = 1 J 19:l plf Truck Wheel Load Distribution to Interior Wall Foundation Truck Perpendicular to the int. watt wl rear axle #2 centered over the watt & dist between axles = 14ft total truck load to wall = " *'"'"""373331bs :;"::c•:'.,:\·,:t> 1 distribution width = •. ,J :38 ft ' Load @ base of wall = ,,., 982 plf Truck Perpendicular to the interior wall wl rear axle #2 directly over watt & distance to axle #1 = 14ft total truck load to wall = ., ,. ,eii~I lbs left plank Load @ base of wall = .. ff~l plf total truck load to wall = ; ~399q lbs right plank Load @ base of wall = '' ·{'. 8~ plf distribution width = '"'.,\ ~s· ft Truck Parallel to the interior watt wl one wheel over wall & 2nd wheel on plank (incl axle 1 &2 only/ total truck load to wall = "''.'':');~~l~! lbs left plank Load @ base of wall = . ij'.~Jr plf total truck load to wall = ci .· f-lg9,.?Jl& lbs right plank Load @ base of wall= <19!1~ plf distribution width = · T' , •'.46 ft Truck Parallel to the interior watt wl the truck centered over the watt (incl axle 1 &2 only/ total truck load to wall = · "•. • "'52571 lbs distribution width= ·.: :"/:'.'Jey ft Load @base of wall= · 114:i plf Uniform Live Load distribution to Wall Footings Perimeter Wall Interior Wall .... ,. / 1575 plf 2625 plf,,,. -SITE STRUCTURES Project PLEASANT PATH sheet date prJ. no. 1051119th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 Design Data : Wall Foundation Design Allowable Bearing Pressure : ;"h!:;:-.\ ,~ggg psf / Rebar strength fy = · · :7i';:/ ;:: 60 ksi :\i·:_ ,1\_:' .,l,,,,,,,,,,, Concrete strength = : .:,:; -~qgq psi Per. wall Cell Width Int. wall Cell Width left Int. wall Cell Width right S-08-072 21 ft 21 ft 14 ft Soil Desity 125 pcf 2.5 ft Plank weight 90 psf Soil Cover over the lid Perimeter Wall Footing Design Design live load 3542 plf 1020 plf Soil Cover dead load Plank dead load Wall dead load 1562.5" plf total dead load Total live+ dead Load Required Ftg Width Selected Ftg Width As regd = Asmin = Qu = 1.33 x As regd = 3696 psf 0.03 sq-in/ft 0.43 sq-in/ft 0.04 sq-in/ft Interior Wall Footing Design 6124 plf 7699 plf 2.57 ft Mu= Vu= phi Vn= Wall Height Wall Thickness L.F Wu 1.6 2520 plf 1.2 4250 plf 1.2 1224 plf 1.2 1875 plf 7349 plf 9869 plf Selected Ftg Thickness ,'>~:· 1559 ft-lbs 3394 plf .11732 plf at face of wall at face of wall at face of wall ,,,-L.F Wu Design live load Soil Cover dead load Plank dead load Wall dead load total dead load .,----i'_?§.?§ plf 1.6 5468.75 plf 1575 plf 1562.5 plf 8606.25 pli 1.2 1.2 1.2 4200 plf 6562.5 plf 1890 plf 1875 plf 10327.5 plf 14527.5 plf Total live+ dead Load Required Ftg Width Selected Ftg Width 11231.25 plf 3.74 ft .,;,c. <-a··-.·8·3·"· ft . ,/,;J,.,, ::.~,'··-······ Selected Ftg Thickness Qu = 3793 psf As regd = Asmin = 1.33xAs regd = 0.09 sq-in/ft 0.43 sq-in/ft 0.12 sq-in/ft Mu= Vu= phi Vn= 4258 ft-lbs 5683 plf fft)? plf at face of wall at face of wall at face of wall 12.5 ft 10 inches JiLin .. ,, siTE STRUCTURES 10511 19th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 Project PLEASANT PATH INTERIOR WALL HEADER GEOMETRY AND LOADS ANALYSIS Header Overburden & Uniform Loads Lid weight Soil Desity Soil Cover depth over lid Plank design clear span left Plank design clear span right Design Uniform Live Load Lid tributary width to header Uniform service load to header Uniform factored load to header Truck Wheel Loads to Header Truck type .Axle Load Wheel Spacing Cover depth 1.7,ii ft 9669 plf 12653 plf Axle assumed centered over & perpendicular to header sheet date //-/J·o'B' prj. no. S-08-072 Load Factors distribution width distribution length 5.50 ft 12.00 ft i·:·,. ..~ ..... _,_,_ ---opening width .. , ;,.;,;,1.9,QQ ft uniform load @ top of plank wheel load to header from left span wheel load to header from right span Total wheel load to header Factored wheel load to header Design Loads & Forces in Header Service Factored· 485 psf 2494 plf 2286 plf 4779 plf 7647 plf . 14.4 kif • 20,3 klf length ea side of hdr 6.00 ft Critical section for shear is at 1.5 feet from the face of the support Design Vu= Design Mu= 71 k 254 k-ft "' ' SITE STRUCTURES i Project PLEASANT PATH sheet to -'--'------ 1051119th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 INTERIOR WALL HEADER DESIGN Header Data date //·/3-o'B' prj. no. S-08-072 8·inches Concrete Strength .3000 psi Header width Header span · Header depth ln/d ratio 10.00 ft Min shear steel ( Area I spacing ) ratio · Max spacing of shear steel Min horiz steel ( Area I spacing ) ratio Max spacing of horzontal steel Review shear capacity of header Reinforcing yield strength Shear reinforcing area spacing Reinf shear capacity <!>Vs Total Shear Capacity Max <l>Vn @ ln/d < 2 30 inches / d = 27.00 inches 4.44 Deep Beam limit ln/d < 5.0 0.012 Min Rebar spacing 60 ksi 0.31 sq in 6 in 57 k 78 k/ 80 k 6 inches #3@ 9.17 #4@ 16.67 0.02 10 inches #4@ #5@ 10.00 15.50 Herz reinf area 0.31 sq in Herz reinf spacing 12 in Cone shear capacity <!>Ve 20 k Factored shear Vu 71 k / Max <l>Vn @ 2 < ln/d < 5 10814 k Review flexural capacity of header min As based on 200 bwd/fy min As based on eq 10-3 As reqd based on bending model As reqd based on tie -strut model 0. 72 sq inches 0.59 sq inches 2.26 sq inches assume Vu is focused @ the center of the header· then Tu= .. 157.88 k As reqd = 2.92 sq inches .• • SITE STRUCTURES Project PLEASANT PATH sheet: date: I/ 10511 19th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 Beam Design Below Grated Opening Design Data Height of Curb: Curb Thickness: Soil Density: Beam Width: Beam Span: Truck Rear Axle Load: Calculated Design Forces Soil Weight= Curb Weight = Self Weight= Wheel Load= Load Factor: 7?9 plf . 250 plf ~~"i'.,, .fl§@ plf . 16.QOO lb DL ,1,2 ..,,.,·,-t LL .1,6 Wu= , H?8 plf Pu= 25§09 lb Design for Flexure Reinf Size # of Top & Bot Reinf Area of Steel Depth to Reinf (d) Comp Block (a) d -a/2 .. / <l>Mn = 1426~.8. ft-lbs Mu = Design for Shear Tie Reinf Size Area of Steel Depth to Reinf ( d) Max Spacing Reinf Spacing ·; \1.:J/r1, 0.20 10.50 ·5.25 in :\1.(f4§: in <l>Vc = <rts~il lbs <l>Vs = <42057 lbs <l>Vc +<l>Vs = Cc_§!l~~s lbs / Vu= u :c )0 //-/3-0'(; prJ. no. S-08-072 11 11 I l 1'-0 11 OR 2'-0 11 l "l 1 --. ; , 1 :!.?1 Gl! ft-lbs / :!'.1'7Ei:! lbs ' • SITE STRUCTURES Project 10511 19th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 Reinforcing at Top of Wall Below Grated Opening Design Data · Top of Footing to Inside Top of Vault (H1) Top of Footing to Finished Grade (H2) Soil Pressure EFW Controlling Lateral Surcharge Grating Span SURCHARGE SOIL PRESSURE WS2 WS1 ------ Calculated Design Forces Fbotofcocb = > ,,(,':,:{~.~ plf Fbo1ofwall = · 'Jt§ plf Mwa!I uniform = Mwan triangle = ;'_ Load Factor Wu= Wall Reinforcing Wall Thickness .~J'.?J\i?it;;\%~'.)~Ji: (~ Clear Cover 'i•:s'l"'.'·"'"' ,,,. .. ,j.2. in · f_;;,} ., ~ 1:£~-~~.,,)~1}1;'.:= Vert Rebar Size,;•:. ,,., ,,,,-a',.,; .. ,,,,,i7'., GRATE: Mu horz curb = q,Mnc,rb = Mbase of wall = R= Mu horzwan = Rebar Area g,~O sq-in cone strength fc ,: .. XfL ai,J.Q.QQ. psi Closure Reinf . EL! ~Xt: " . As in Closure (;/;:,,)('l,';,1,§~ sq-in <l>Mn = · ·. ·~4!!§ ft-lbs sheet: date: prJ. no. I/J. /1-;3-oc;t z·!&·t(k curb height 1.5 ft curb horz re inf bar :\ -~: ~~;}i'}(~r curb horz reinf spacing 1. ?l,'',1,:i _;12 in o/c depth t~ucr~nt~~~~~:~f :~'.x::;~:·i, :~ Ws1 = 750 Ws2= 60 :~~~ ft-lbs ; . SJ.QT ft-lbs curb self-supported '28578 ft-lbs /~/'@/1S :2]J,fl. plf .§~§?,Q ft-lbs depth to reinf (d) 6.69 in comp block (a) 4:§J in d -a/2 •.,,·,, ,,, ,,4,27 in -~-... ,-.,-, Mu= II • Conterminous 48 States 2003 NEHRP Seismic Design Provisions Zip Code= 98059 Spectral Response Accelerations SDs and SD I SDs = 2/3 x SMs and SDI= 2/3 x SM! Site Class D Period (sec) 0.2 1.0 Period (sec) 0.2 1.0 Period (sec) 0.2 1.0 Centroid Sa (g) 0.915 0.476 (SDs) (SDI) Maximum Sa (g) 0.964 0.496 (SDs) / . .,.,,.- (SD I) v°' Minimum Sa (g) 0.857 0.453 (SDs) (SDI) 0) 1/-13-0'8" • ~ SITE STRUCTURES Project . PLEASANT PATH sheet: date: 10511 19th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 Vault Seismic Analysis v Vault Length = L ' I I PLAN Vault VVidth =W V Bf.lit Le~9tr.. 17 .3 " .Soll Density. ,,- Vault Width: 37 ft Wall Thickness: ~ Soil Cover: 2.5 ft Number of Cells: Structure Dead Load Tributary to the Lid: Weight of Soil Weight of Lid Weight of Walls Total Structure Dead Load: Seismic Review: Site Zip Code: IBC Site Class: 98059 D 894 k 257 k 258 k Design Spectral Response Accel (Sds): Response Modification Factor: 1.2(Sds)/R = 0.289 V= Shear distributed over 90% of shortest length . of wall (d assumed to be 90% of vault width): v= 6.12klfr_ <l>vc + <!>vs = 32.41 kif .r ' )/-/3-08 prj. no. S-08-072 Average Soil Cover Depth = sc r;:::::11=1-='=" ======:::;::i ---. ~ 12.:; pcf SECTI~N Wall ,e19ht h. 10 in Vert Reinf: ~ 2 Vert Reinf Spacing: - 1409 k 0.964 ..-- Wall Height =h ...., L 13.5ft 7 12 "o/c fc: fy: 4.0 for Ordinary Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls 408 k Shear capacity of concrete: <l>vc = 9.86 kif Shear capacity of reinforcing: <!>vs= 22.55 kif 3000 psi 60 ksi .. • SITE STRUCTURES Project PLEASANT PATH sheet 1051119th Ave SE, Suite C date Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 prJ. no. HS20-44 TRUCK LOADING HS20-44 72,000 LBS Front Axle: I 8,000 LBS '(i;, • ~ = Rear Axle #1: ~·111 1. 111 I 32,000 LBS 0 ., "g b b = 0 ,:, -at" ...,, .1 I Rear Axle #2: '' · 111 111 32,000 LBS l~0 oe.J I , ..• ·.· ,~ ·. ) I ( v· 14· ~ ~o· .·.·•··. ~I 8,000 lb l-!S20•44 :12,000 lb 32,obo~lb axle s,600 lb HSIS.,.44 24,000 lb 24,000.,.l~ o••e . . )-.· ·. . ~.···.···.·.{-~~~o.•.•correspondiag O.IW . . OAW . . . ' H,tl'l,lck . "' ... W = col!>blne<I weight t1f fo:t two o,les V • vorlQ'ole, use spoclng whic:.h proO~ces moxlmum stres~ Far de$fqn of sfubs, Ce<lteroae l3f lllheei to be i ft from curb Al )/-1_3 ·OS S-08-072 , ..... ' • SITE STRUCTURES 1051119th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 Project PLEASANT PATH sheet date A2 II ·13-CZ prJ. no. S-08-072 ______ c .... o=--N_.C..._R .... E...,TE .... T .... E .... C .... H_...N ..... O .... L...,O.._G=--Y .... C.._O.._.R ..... P __ O .... R_.A .... T ..... 10.._N.___~iiii 12%" HOLLOW CORE SLAB - HS20-44 12 11 \', \\ {._4) · ~ -\1· 'M,htt-l-+-l-+--l--+-f---1-·-··---l--·l--+-li---+--t--l--li----1--~ 1 .\. 1' -q 10 z ::i u. 9 u a. \ l\ ·. ... ) -t-\-+F~\-..,-f\--t--t7--J---t--f--t--t-+--l·-t-+--t--l--+-r-· -1--. ---1 ' • \ l ·. ·. \. i 0 N 6 ~ II . L\L~ L { # = Number of Filled Voids required + · e---~ T\J \\; :\ -for 2' -0" at each end of each slab. ·- 15 :l: 7 i=' !:::. 6 a: w ~ 5 u :::! '\--' L\:~ I I I ___ ------------+-------' CT '., 'f\ _., 1 Vent Notch' I\ '{ ' );~., I ·- 'rt-.f"\-~--'~.c-\)v~_-_'~-'ilr\i~-4,.,:.'.J-~J=1111s~1ra~ln~d~-:.;=1i1~-~1~'--r--t-i-,,--i--i--i i ·----,____,,_--1--+-+--+-f--l +1--~-t'..-').-t-'_•.r-'-x--t--'if.l_,,:r~'"'\:~l--;,f-"-· fi1.,1,,s,,,tra,,,.nd,,,•,,,<,,-r,,,.,;;,=,,,.12.,s,,,p"'c.;f)=!,t-+-+-·t--- ",I\ -~ I'-·',i,c / 11Strands(r,0 ,=135pcf) I 0 4 !/) u:. 0 ~ 3 (!) iii 2 ::c +1-1--+-+-1--11--+.1 /_ ·+-..._ :---. -I'< ... ::-:-~-lt--t--t--+--r--1 "-K 'r-..._ / ~._ ,"<J::, :::::r +I--+-!-/ -l-+-1-1-+--=RP. nee i • • r -~ :, wau•-~ 1-..... -r-;,._ ·r-:. ,,.,.,_ +-+-+--+-;.....;-...,...-+t-1 I \ ....._ '-f'"'·~: ;"r,,"-,-:::1, -t--l I I I 0 +1--1--l-' -f--,!l-+--+'--a-~'1-+-:-'-+--+' -1--,'-+--1-' -+--+' -1--+'-+--+-f--l 14 16 16 20 22 24 26 26 30 32 34 36 36 SIMPLE SPAN (ft) GENERAL NOTES: 1.) A minimum cover depth of six inches OR a three Inch thick cast in place concrete topping slab is required. 2.) Simple Span is center1ine of bearing to centerline of bearing. 3.) The Knee Wall envelope represents the maximum span and height of soil cover that can be supported by slabs with standard notches for manhole openings, assuming void fill concrete fc = 3,000 psi. Points falling outside this envelope require knee walls to support the slabs at manhole openings. 4.) Interpolation between strand contours is acceptable. DO NOT extrapolate beyond the bounds of this chart. 5.) Soil cover is assumed to be uniform. 6.) Except as noted, soil cover unit weight is assumed to be 120 pcf. 7.) Minimum span length= 14'-0". 8.) The values shown on this chart are in compliance wtth IBC 2003·& ACI 318-05. · 9.) The Vent Notch envelope represents the maximum span and height of son cover that can be sup'ported by slabs with 6Yzn standard notches in adjacent slabs to accommodate 12· diameter vents, assuming void fill concrete fc = 3,000 psi. Refer to Detail 3 on page 15 of this brochure for vent notch details. 1/SJ07 MANUFACTURERS OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE_• TACOMA, WASHINGTON 7 • SITE STRUCTURES 1051119th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 Project PLEASANT PATH sheet date A3 )/-13-0% prJ. no. S-08-072 __ ____,C=O=N~C.,,Ri...ETu..E--1.T.:...EC=:..i.H.i..:.N.::.::0;.1;;,L O=G:..i.Y....:C=O=R P....:O=R=A...:.T=I O~N--iiiffl 121/2" HOLLOW CORE SLAB d z ::i u.. ~ !;l ..... II ... 0 E 150 PSF 12 ,---~...,1-,---1.,......~~~--.--,---,--,,~-~I --.-~~~~,---,---~~~--.-~~ Vent Notch0 ' 11 -_: ',\ n. 4' I I I I 10 . \J . ' ____L ) _j__j_~-l-+--1--1--1---.J.---1--+-I---~ ~ '\. '. ~-T-( '#, = Number of Filled Voids required 9 ..-\.. ,\ t -for 2'-0" at each end of each slab. ~ \-~ -I I I 8 -\"'\\ .; '\ ,,. '.,\ ,_ -'l-+----1--+.--l----e'---!--.J.-+.---1--1--I -' 11 Strands ~' ·. \. / ~I\ 7 II--H-i\.f-1 ,._\'~+\\'·i,,'1..~'i·l\--+..,.f'-Jl'. .. ,~1-,:S~trands (y'°" = 125 pct) _}.1-+-1-~-+---+--+--+-+--I ' -1--1-~' .. dl ' • '.I> ,. , 6 --,-r +--, , \ •• • / 11 Strands (r~, = 135 pct) I \. '\' ',. ,· 5 -'-1--1--'-+-"--1---1-~~-' • • , ~~. ·f--+--l-+-+-+-·l-+-+-+-"-+-+-+--1--1 f' ..,, .. -~ 4 +1-+-+-11'..~f-+l-+"\.-Hl-fl~-~*-+--l--e--!---1---+---l--+-le--!---1---+---I--I "-f " "~' 9 I ' 3 ··-Knee 3 I i"- 2 I I I I o I I I 14 16 18 20 22 ' I ' 24 -.... I I 26 I ' 28 SIMPLE SPAN (ft) ' I ' 30 32 34 36 38 GENERAL NOTES: 1.) A minimum cover depth of six inches OR a three inch thick cast in place concrete topping slab is required. 2.) Simple Span is centertine of be"aring to centerline of bearing. 3.) The Knee Wall envelope represents the maximum span and height of soil cover that can be supported by slabs with standard notches for manhole openings, assuming void fill concrete fc = 3,000 psi. Points falling outside this envelope require knee walls to support the slabs at manhole openings. 4.) Interpolation between strand contours is acceptable. 00 NOT extrapolate beyond the bounds of this chart. 5.) Soil cover is assumed to be uniforrn. 6.) Except as noted, soil cover unit weight is assumed to be 120 pcf. 7 .) Minimum span length= 14'-0". 8.) The values shown on this chart are in compliance with IBC 2003 & ACI 318-05. 9.) The Vent Notch envelope represents the maximum span and height of soil cover that can be supported by slabs with 6%0 standard notches in adjacent slabs to accommodate 12 .. diameter vents, assuming void fill concrete fc = 3,000 psi. Refer to Detail 3 on page 15 of this brochure for vent notch details. 115107 MANUFACTURERS OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE • TACOMA. WASHINGTON 9 .. SITE STRUCTURES Project PLEASANT PATH sheet date prJ. no. A4 1051119th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 J/-/3-0ri S-08-072 U _...:..,...C.;...;.Q...:..,...NC...:..,...R...:..,...~T...:..,...E _TEC_;...·· ... ·...:..,...HN...:..,...O...:..,...LOG.;...;,..• ·. ·;..;...· .·. ~_c_;.... o;..;...·· .· R...:..,...PO.;.;....RATI...:..,...· -"'-0"-+N__,...,...,..._..__ -~ I 121/2 11 HOLLOW CORE SLAB DIMENSIONS FOR !)ETAILING .s:, · , 3'•10112• · . 111(1•' 1'1/111' . . . . ....... ·.· (4'·0" NC?!"hs,! WldU1) SPAN-LOAD TABLE . -7 . 1:~ilve tio.01 ······ . . 5HIAPLl:SPAN I~ l~~i Prestress 1h""i, ... -.·.·· (KIPS) ST~l'JD~ 40 #. 4a ~il i;tj . 28 32 36 82 ··--:··· 70.7 3 78 44 20 77.7 4 125 80 49 26 101.3 5 174 117 78 50 .27 124.8 6 221 1.53 106 70 43 23• 148.4 7 267 186 129 89 59 38 172,0 .a 307 216 15.3 11l8 74 49 29 195.5 9 343 243 1.74 125 88 .61 40 23• 219.1. OQ] I 37B'i 270 195 142 103 73 50 31• 242.7 11 4fai ~97 21} 160 1.17 85 6() 4,) ?4* ··. SECTION PROPERTIES (with shear keys grouted). 12 A ,,;:i131n2 I " 6138 In~ Z, ·-; 1()19 In' v, ;;; a.:o21n Zo =9'.47.in' 'w 1:1 84 psf · Vo = s.4il In NOTES: .. . . . ...... · ·.. . . . . . -1. Th• values glvEin_ In thrs table we. bas_e~ .Cli:l._holJ_OW core slab$ ~-ut ~ar ~elrtfo!f!~enL_.SUpe~ertpis (1. 2, etc.) fonOWlrtg ·va1u~$. lri.th8)~bl8 _1n_dtc~te tt,& .iitiinber 0( fli!&d YOlds r8ciUl.rGd at the ~ds o, slabs to d8\1916p 1h8 .;inciv.iable ~rfrnP9.s~ .I~~-. &19 Page.?, -~~~~~·-~CJ_r .dl~~S.!C!~\ . _ . . . . _ . · . . . _ ' 2. Astflrlsk {*) toUOWlriQ v8lu8S In the table lndlcatiiJ that the total deflection ul1dei' a.a loads 1s gnilat8ithari U3SO bu1 leS9 · th8:n" i.J;·ao; · -· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·-' -· · · ·.· · · · · · · · · · · · -· · · · · :3. lri~~tj:>~J~t~O~ b~~~,p_\lc3:~.~. ls -~pta~1~ .. i;>? n~ ~rat~ ya1oo,s ~ th~ .blary~. ~P~¥~ of _th_~~~-· .4. Th~i,. Spa_i,-:~~fi Tables-~ lryte~f:td .. liS _an_alt;l._to preJi_rplriary ~ng, ~ound engl~eering Judgement l_s requlrod for u,e ·1:1pprie~t1cn of ~ in.to~~-ori ~~ ~ffri d~S1grl ca_s~~. · · · · · MANUFACTUR~RsoF PREitREssE6 cbNcRET~·. TACOMA. WASHINGTON·. \.,'' .. ,.,, ... SITE STRUCTURES Project PLEASANT PATH sheet A5 ------ 1051119th Ave SE, Suite C Everett, WA, (425)-357-9600 date Jl-/3 -0'8' Pr.J. no. S-08-072 ~ . . -~ -.. HS 20 ~ 4 4 TRUCK LIVE LOAD ON . WALLS i6K 6' .. \ I I I I I ------ .... . B +,,.1r,=1-..+-+--+----i.,.,..a.+-,-· r··~__,t,,-......_~__,,i.,;-,,.,.._..,.._~..,.,,,"'-'.....,,-'--1--,t,,--t .... i-is2044 LOADING .. · .. ,, . ······ .. ... ,·, . . . . 70:2" tall w~ils • . 1 '0 0" minimum cciver: 145 psf Uniform LL 6-+--+i,H+i-1+-~-+,,,,,,,,,_;·=··+-,-··~~,=-1--,.+ ' ~,~,, rn~~).ryi,y.m ¢9\f$r: 85 psf uniform •,-'--: ""':--. a: w > 0 u ..... .•: .·. . I 1 \ ·• \ \\ ' .. -· . . ·,'\ ... ,_ •..... ,' \ '\ I\ X , :·.··.· x~ :::···· 12'-6" tall walls 1 '-0" rniriimurn cover' · · 1,00 psi uniform .. . . .. 2'-6" maximum cover: 55 psfuniform .... · . ·, •.·-·. . ... _. '·'i"' ·· ... . --,, ,' \ " \ X,:-,/ s 2+-+-+ir\ft\~ .... ~.~'\.rJ~.~~~.~~;.~,-.•• ·.+'-'T"~.+,-.+-:-+,-'-,i~t-'-'+-++,-'-,i..,...,,t,,-+++~ ... •. -· , .'\ \. ...._ ·x ... ·.--._ .· ........ 0 +--1..~y.L.;..,.,&1..:,+4"'--'.J.j.,~....;.J,;l....... ++ ... ..,··' c,"-...;·,J.·· ..:..;.;.L.;.,.· ..1"'-'.:::· .... b.+4..;.,.;,.J,.;·;.;.· · .;J· i.,.>.;:;,;..;;..i 0 .. ·.. I DO: 2 JO 300 400 AVE:RAGE UNIFORM HOR fZONTAL l,OAD I I I +-..;· co ~ l . ~ I ,. I I : 'I • 1 r·1 /. :, I, ,, ,, ' I• \1 p 1, .I! !I ., {"=It)' I I I' . . . I I , ~I~ --'--f---+--+-'-----,l----+- _f-.------1~, . -· ffi -I j . ! I I I I 'Qf-\.nr' E.."i-.\-116\T ?L~51'\nT PA-lit • DIMENSIONS MEASURED ALONG BACK EDGE OF SiDEWALK ---.._ SEE PLANS FOR RADIUS --J TOP WIDTH OF CURBS VARIES WITH TYPE OF CURB (SEE FIG. 3-002) FLUSH 4" THICK CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6' ~ 5' MIN LANDING 6' 6" CEMENT CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN CURB 3/8" EXPANSION JOINT, TYP. .. RAMP TEXTURE @ DEPRESSED CURB 0.15' MIN. CRUSH. SURF. TOP COURSE 10 :0 lij E ij m ,_a C SE 8 CTRIOAN A 2 0 --------------=UR,...,.__,_"-'=M,_P_..._A,__ ____________ _ SEE PLANS FOR RADIUS TOP WIDTH OF CURBS VARIES WITH TYPE OF CURB (SEE FIG. 3-002) NOTES: CURB RAMP 28 6" CEMENT CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN CURB PLANTER STRIP, TYP. 3/8" EXPANSION JOINT, TYP. (SEE STD. PLAN F-3) 1. PLACEMENT OF GRATINGS, ACCESS COVERS AND OTHER APPURTENANCES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED ON CURB RAMPS, LANDINGS AND GUTTERS WITHIN THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE. @ RAMPS SHALL BE TEXTURED USING TRUNCATED DOME PATIERN (SEE FIGURE 3-011). DETECTABLE WARNING PATTERN SHALL BE YELLOW IN COMPLIANCE WITH WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION B-14.3(3) 3. RAMP CENTER LINE SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO OR RADIAL TO CURB RETURNS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER. 4. RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT CORRESPONDING SIDEWALK· LOCATIONS ON OPPOSITE SIDE OF STREETS WHEN RAMPS ARE CONSTRUCTED ON ONE SIDE or STREET. SEE FIG. 3-010. .Q :Q :0 ·n ·:~ :r1 1-Y lij i 5. THIS DETAIL APPLIES TO BOTH ROLLED AND VERTICAL CURB ROADWAYS. l1 ===6;,,. =S;;;E;;;E;,.;.;Fl;;;GU;;;R,;;E~3-=0;;0;,;1=F=O;,;,R;,.,;;,CU;;.R,;;B;.,;;AN;,;;D;.;;S,;;ID=E=W=AL;;,K~JO;;IN;;.T;..;_P;;;LA;;;C;;;EM;;;E;;,N;,;,T ·~=============',"=t4 ~ King county Department of Transportation Road Services Division :Z007 Design and Construction Sti:ndards FIG. 3,~61~. \Jrt 3.25 · • :U CURB RAMP 2A, 28 ALTERNATE • (SEE SEC. f'IG 3-012) 3/8" EXPANSION JOINT ·(TYP.) ---.J ____ ,,,, @OETECTABLE WARNING PATTERN (SEE DETAIL)--;i~-j....-'" CURB RAMP SIDEWALK PlAN lAYOUT 1 NOTES ' . CURB, OR· CURB AND GUTTER ', ·, •• 1 .• '. '•,. DETECTABLE WARNING - PATTERN AREA SHALL BE ~ · ' . YELLOW, IN COMPLIANCE' I iJ!.i I ' . \ ' WITH STD. SPEC. 8-14.3(3)~i, .•. MIN. A 1 5/8- B 5/8" C 7/16" D 718" MAX. 2· ;515- 1 112· 3/4" 1 7 /16" AT !.,(;t~l/ ·_··' .·.~. B 1__J,lft~.' .@Ad,. ·~"ll~~·" . . -... , .. -_;.,/• PLAN El&YATION DETECTABLE WARNING PATTERN. DETAIL 1. PLACEMENT Of' GRATINGS, ACCESS COVERS AND OTHER APPURTENANCES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED ON CURB RAMPS, LANDINGS AND GUTTERS WITHIN THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE. @ RAMPS SHALL BE TEXTURED USING TRUNCATED DOME PATTERN (SEE DETAIL THIS PAGE). DETECTABLE WARNING PATTERN SHALL BE YELLOW IN COMPLIANCE WITH WSDOT STANDARD SPECIF'ICATION B-14.3(3) 3. RAMP CENTER LINE SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO OR RADIAL TO CURB RETURNS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER. , 4, RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT CORRESPONDING SIDEWALK LOCATIONS ON OPPOSITE SIDE Of' STREETS WHEN. RAMPS ARE CONSTRUCTED ON ONE SIDE Of' STREET, SEE f'IG. 3-010. @ C:@ LANDING SHALL BE MINIMUM 4 X 4'. ---. CURB RAMP IA MUST BE INSTALLE; ~~~~S; OTHE~ISE APPR~O: • :::.:.::::, 7. SEE f'IGURE 3-001 f'OR CURB AND SIDEWALK JOINT PLACEMENT. ~ King County Department of Transportation Road Services OMslon 2007 Design and Construction Standards CURB RAMP1A FIG. 3-011 3-21 Mary Marcotte 10314 SE 194th Place Renton, WA 98055-7309 (party of record) Kevin Morrison 10448 SE 194th Place Renton, WA 98055 (party of record) Updated: 10/22/09 IPAIRTXIE§ OIF IRIECO!Rli) HIOlllDAY-ZASTOUPIL AA? LUA09-121, AAP Roger & Priscilla Witters 19409 104th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98055 tel: (253) 852-5864 (party of record) Michael Willmore 10327 SE 194th Place Renton, WA 98055 tel: (206) 841-6354 (party of record) Brenda Supasatit 10308 SE 196th Street Renton, WA 98055 tel: (253) 373-9777 (party of record) (Page 1 of 1) Stacy Tucker From: Jennifer T. Henning Sent: To: Thursday, March 04, 2010 11 :36 AM Stacy Tucker Subject: FW: 19405 104th Ave SE Remember the Holliday Add'I Animals permit? Here is some current info ... From: Marilyn J. Kamcheff Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 8:02 AM To: Jennifer T. Henning Subject: FW: 19405 104th Ave SE Here's the string of emails on the Additional Animals Permit for the above address. It appears that the problem has been resolved. I notice D09-093 is listed as "pending" in permits plus -LUA09-121 and P09-169 are both approved. Does D09-093 remain pending? M From: Thomas Wilkinson Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 4:37 PM To: Marilyn J. Kamcheff Subject: RE: 19405 104th Ave SE There are no animal at the house. They will be tearing down the temporary structures and treating the ground before they move to their new home. Tom From: Marilyn J. Kamcheff Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 10:08 To: Thomas Wilkinson Subject: RE: 19405 104th Ave SE Thanks. -~ ---·------- From: Thomas Wilkinson Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 8:53 AM To: Marilyn J. Kamcheff Subject: RE: 19405 104th Ave SE I will stop by the house today. Thanks, Tom From: Marilyn J. Kamcheff Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 8:18 AM To: Thomas Wilkinson Subject: 19405 104th Ave SE 1 At the end of January I got another c, .,la int on the Holliday residence and wet. ,d at that time. The goats were removed over the weekend and you said that the property owners were moving to Maple Valley. Have you done an inspection lately? Are they in compliance? Is the property vacant? Paul wanted me to tell you he has your map. Thanks for your help. M ~ rtlk:J VI, KC! vv..c~ eff Code Compliance Inspector 425-430-7269 mkamcheff@rentonwa.gov 2 I CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: January 27, 2010 To: City Clerk's Office From: City Of Renton Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office Project Name: Holliday Additional Animals Permit LUA (file) Number: LUA-09-121, MP Cross-References: AKA's: Holliday-Zastoupil Additional Animals Permit Project Manager: Ion Arai Acceptance Date: September 30, 2009 Applicant: Maria Holliday Zastoupil Owner: Same as applicant · Contact: Same as applicant PID Number: 6388000140 ERC Decision Date: . ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Approval: November 20, 2009 Appeal Period Ends: December 4, 2009 Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: Applicant is requesting an Additional Animals Permit to allow 1 dog, 3 birds, 2 goats, 28 chickens, and 67 rabbits on a 15,142 sq. ft. lot within the R-8 zoning designation. Location: 19405 104'" Avenue SE Comments: Code Compliance for any further action regarding this project. I DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT --==~J[) PLANNING DIVISION ADDITIONAL ANiMALS PERMIT DATE OF PERMIT ISSUANCE: LAND USE ACTION FILE NO.: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT MANAGER: OWNER/ APPLICANT: PROJECT LOCATION: DATE OF EXPIRATION: EVALUATION FORM & DECISION November 20, 2009 LUA09-121, AAP Holliday Additional Animals Permit Ion Arai, Assistant Planner Maria Holliday-Zastoupl 19405 -1041h Avenue SE Renton, WA 98055 19405 -1041h Avenue SE November 19, 2010 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant is requesting an Additional Animals Permit to allow 1 dog, 3 birds, 2 goats, 28 chickens, and 67 rabbits on a 15,142 square foot lot within the Residential-8 zoning designation. Per City Code, the applicant shall apply for the obtainment of an Additional Animals Permit [RMC 4-9-100] to allow for the extra animals beyond those permitted by the Code. The Code permits 3 household pets, 3 small lot domestic, and 2 large lot domestic animals without an Additional Animals Permit if lot size requirements are met. The facilities for the animals would be located within the southwest portion of the property behind the primary residence. There is a perimeter fence around the entire enclosure. The animal facilities include an existing 512 square foot outbuilding, a chicken house which is a 60 square foot covered area enclosed by chicken wire, a 100 square foot covered stall for the goats, a 180 square foot roofed structure for protection of the animals during inclement weather, a 380 square foot pole and tarp enclosure for the caged rabbits, and a 2,400 square foot open area for the goats and chickens to roam for exercise. The structures are located on the southeast property line and the open area is located between the southern property line and the facilities for the animals. ; City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Holliday Additional Animals Permit Admin,,.,"'1tive Additional Animals Permit WA09-121, AAP DATE OF PERMIT: November 20, 2009 Page 2 of6 DECISION CRITERIA (RMC 4-9-lOOG): The Development Services Director shall review requests for Additional Animals Permits for compatibility of the proposal with the surrounding neighborhood. In order to determine that the site and facility will be adequate and to ensure the humane and appropriate care of the animals, the Development Services Director may require that the property be inspected by an Animal Control Officer. Factors to be considered in determining compatibility and adequacy are: Yes No N/A ~ D D ~ D D D ~ D D ~ D D ~ D D ~ D D ~ D D D ~ D D ~ 1. Will the keeping of additional animals have an adverse effect on abutting or adjacent properties or cause a detriment to the community? (see Decision Criteria Comments for more discussion) 2. Is there a past history of animal control complaints regarding animals kept by the applicant? (see Decision Criteria Comments for more discussion) 3. Do adequate and appropriate facility and rear yard specifications/dimensions exist that ensure the health and safety of the animals? (The facility for medium lot and large lot domestic animals must include a grassy or vegetated area.) (see Decision Criteria Comments for more discussion) 4. Are the animal's size, type, and characteristics of breed compatible with the adequacy of the site and facilities? (see Decision Criteria Comments for more discussion) S. Is animal waste product managed in a safe, clean, and odor-free manner? (see Decision Criteria Comments for explanation of more discussion) 6. Is the request for additional animals compatible with the zoning classification of the premises on which the keeping of additional animals is to occur? (see Decision Criteria Comments for more discussion) 7. a. Keeping of additional large lot animals requirements If the application is for keeping of additional large lot animals, does the applicant provide a copy of an adopted farm management plan based on the King County Conservation District's Farm Conservation and Practice Standards? (see Decision Criteria Comments for more discussion) b. Is there adequate pasturage to support a greater number of animals? 8. If the application is for an animal foster care provider, has the t ..... ' City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Admi;Jative Additional Animals Permit LUA09-121, AAP Holliday Additional Animals Permit DATE OF PERMIT: November 20, 2009 Page 3 of 6 Yes No N/A applicant kept paperwork for all foster animals which states that the animals are foster animals from a sponsoring organization? (Such paperwork shall be provided upon request to City officials.) GENERAL STANDARDS FOR KEEPING ANIMALS (RMC 4-4-0lOG): D [8J D D [8J D D D [8J D [8J D [8J D D 9. Is the shelter location located a minimum of ten (10) feet from any property line and in the rear yard? (Note: unless, Planning Division determines that a side yard would be a better location) (see Decision Criteria Comments for explanation of mitigation measures) 10. a. Are dog-runs, open-run areas, and permanent/temporary kennel structures surrounded by a fence of adequate height, located a minimum of ten (10) feet from any property line and in the rear yard? (Note: unless, Planning Division determines that a side yard would be a better location.) (see Decision Criteria Com'ments for more discussion) b. Is the subject lot larger than one gross acre in size? If so, then dog-runs, open-run areas, and permanent/temporary kennel structures surrounded by a fence of adequate height, may be located closer than ten (10) feet from any property line and if the dog-run, open run areas, and kennel structure is no closer than one hundred (100) feet to any dwelling unit and the location is approved by the Planning Division. 11. Are all animals kept in such a manner so as not to create any objectionable noise, odor, annoyance, or become a public nuisance? (see Decision Criteria Comments for more discussion) 12. Are animal and food wastes properly removed to keep the kennel free from the infestation of insects, rodents, or diseases, and from obnoxious or foul odors? DECISION CRITERIA COMMENTS: [the bullet number below corresponds to the Decision Criteria number above] 1. Two comment letters were received concerning the impact of the animals on the neighborhood. The major complaint stated in the letters was odor. A neighbor to the southwest commented that they kept their windows closed to avoid the odor. One letter suggested that an outdoor compost pile was compounding the odor problem. Allergens from the animals were cited as a health concern. Other concerns expressed were loose chickens causing damage to landscaping, the animals attracting predators such as coyotes and raccoons, and diminished property values due to the animals' odor. City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Holliday Additional Animals Permit DATE OF PERMIT: November 20, 2009 Admin,w~, ative Additional Animals Permit LUA09-1Zl, AAP Page 5 of 6 10. The open run area for the animals is located south of the primary residence and the animal shelters in between the east and west property lines. The east property line fence is not an adequate barrier. Photographs of chickens wandering outside the animals' enclosure were provided within the comment letters. The same comment letter describing the chickens' destructive behavior to the surrounding properties' landscaping. 11. The Animal Control Inspection report approves the condition in which the animals are kept, but the odor and loose chickens have proven to be a nuisance to the neighbors, especially the neighbor to the southeast, who have difficulties with the odor and allergens produced by the animals which restricts them from enjoying the use of their property. CONCLUSION: Although Animal Control approved the inspection of the animals' living conditions, the animals' impacts and intensity of use on the surrounding neighborhood are detrimental to the neighbors' welfare. The neighbors' concerns are detailed within the submitted comment letters. The concerns include issues with odor, allergens, loose animals, noise, property damage, and reduction in property value due to the odor. Because of the impact on the surrounding neighborhood, Staff recommends that the number of outdoor animals be reduced to the permitted number allowed by City Code. The 1 dog and 3 birds do not impact the surrounding neighborhood, and are not mentioned as concerning the neighbors in a negative way; therefore staff recommends that the indoor animals be permitted to remain on the subject property. The application also does not meet the General Standards for .Keeping Animals. Shelter locations and animal pens shall be located a minimum of 10 feet from any property line. The rabbit enclosure appears to be within ten feet of the southeast property line. Also, City Code requires that all animals shall be kept and maintained in a manner which confines their movement and activity to the premises of the owner. During a Staff visit, a Staff member took a picture of one of the applicant's chickens on top of the perimeter fence, and outside of the property. Also a neighbor submitted photographs of loose chickens in the immediate neighborhood .. The perimeter has shown to be unable to confine the chickens to the property. Staff recommends that the applicant rebuild/repair the perimeter fence to a height of 6 feet to adequately confine the chickens on the property. DECISION: The Holliday Additional Animals Permit is partially approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The goats are not permitted and shall be removed from the property. The applicant has 60 days to remove the animals from the property from the date of this decision. 2. The applicant shall rebuild/repair the perimeter fence to a minimum height of 6 feet in order to adequately confine the animals to the applicant's property. City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Holliday Additional Animals Permit DATE OF PERMIT: November 20, 2009 Admin,-~, ative Additional Animals Permit WA09-121, AAP Page 6 of 6 3. The applicant shall move all shelter structures a minimum of 10 feet from any property line. 4. The applicant shall reduce the total number of combined rabbits and chickens to no more than 7 total animals. The applicant has 90 days to remove the excess rabbits and chickens from the property from the date of this decision. 5. The applicant shall schedule an inspection of the property with City of Renton Code Compliance by calling the Code Compliance Hotline [425-430-7373] within 90 days to verify that all of the conditions have been met. Datb Development Services Division -APPEALS: Appeals of permit issuance must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 p.m. on December 4, 2009. Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required fee to the City of Renton Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. EXPIRATION: The Additional Animals Permit is valid for one year and the annual fee for renewal is $50.00. The Additional Animals Permit shall be annually reviewed and valid as long as the operator is in compliance with the City requirements and has not had the Additional Animals Permit and/or related home occupation license revoked or renewal refused. In addition, all animals that are required to be licensed shall be individually licensed according to the regulations found in chapter 5-4 RMC, Animal Licenses. Failure to renew animal licenses as required in chapter 5-4 RMC shall trigger review and/or revocation of the Additional Animals Permit. cc: parties of record 89-15-54 W 135 ii~ ,••a'ii:=ll:IIDlllltlZIZl!IIDD D ~'!.,_,-o= D•DD c::::ca a 1. u O IU!Sml ' 18' RD. E.SMT M ,-- ro: (Y) ~.E. 194TH PL N 89-06-27 W --. -----·----· -------------. ------- 135 128.316 -~~.;1· 0 Olli r-i r-Q~~""""""'---L OT 1 r-iD 85. 083 '" ~R. "X" ~i<:J '2, w -~ 64. 918~·- : ro ,0 r-i r-i u 052205 I i 9234 O'\ u (Y) u 14684 s:g,I • -.• D ~-: _; ;,L'.~ D LC) · ·--· z10 ••••=•n .. c:=;naaclq.9 D Q 2 -El/ 2 -~~--~-1~ ) • D N !N 3. 4 6 -. ·; l!j'j --·- w r-1~ a:> u I og O', m I (Y) O'\ u I r-i D 0 z -~ D U' '' U: AC Jm D LI) ,D'a) '~ . ... <:::I' 14 ~ '};-~ <) ' .{: "y<:) <q0 · 638800 0140 ~ ',' ..) '\:i ',\, •. i LI) ..; 0 <o '? . ' 3 0 'i' .3 i • s O 11 '\ O'\ Lf)UJ ! 0 '1,, '1: ~ (Y) ~ Cl) ; O'\ • . c:::, I : r- "I 0 w • <:::I'! : <:::I' 0 z ~ I.O 0 •· 638800 0110 :r: Cb 15 .._ ):! -.:::I" 0 • ' ~> .1. ,L :J 15142 /\ i q"'·i VJ.. ~ rt, Oi Co .C)C) ··~ <o •. ·· / "y '? ·/1., 'l,, . ~"y ~ 633800 0130 13 I\\Z: ! f-'i w -.1: I o',N • : 0 ,t:,. . I ow 0,0 \tt ::8 12 60 -. I 638800 uW: 0120 I.O LI) 0 ro I ,• ,, . ro O'\ • (Y)' 1 O', I ' <:::I' o: r-i Z' ' October 15, 2009 From: Dennis Zastoupil 19405 104th Ave. S.E. Renton, Washington 98055 253-217-1501 To: Renton City Planning Board In the Fall of 2006 at age 61, I was a distributor of framed art to furniture stores in Washington State. Unfortunate for me, retirement came early because of the sale of business by my wholesale supplier in Coeur d' Alene, Idaho. Not being eligible for Social Security for yet more than a year, I decided to begin raising rabbits as a table fare and as a supplemental income. Concurrently to raise chickens for eggs and table fare, we undertook to develop the 4000 or so square feet of overgrown land at the South end of our property. At the time it had been overgrown primarily by Himalayan blackberries and of no use to us for recreation, agriculture or animal husbandry. Most of my searching for and success in acquiring breeding stock rabbits transpired via Craigslist contacts and subsequent purchases. Not being able to find the breed I sought West of the Cascades, namely New Zealand and California rabbits, I was able to make contact with three breeders in the Spokane area during the Winter of 2007. Unlike horses or cattle which require "bills of sale" and other certifications, my transactions with individuals for rabbits was for cash, and a hand shake. Similarly via Craigslist, I had acquired a pick-up load of cages to house them. Nutritionally, rabbits are very healthy. The breeds I raise are ready for table in 10 to 12 weeks. Rabbits will not make me a fortune. Using the same vehicle, Craigslist, I have been able to provide pets to individuals, often children in families, pets to 4H individuals, breeding stock to individuals interested in raising rabbits, and occasionally sell at the Enumclaw Livestock Auction on Saturdays. • Laureen M. Nicolay To: Stacy Tucker Cc: Jennifer T. Henning; Ion Arai Subject: Missed Notice and Party of Record for Holliday Additional Animals Permit -LUA09-121 Please make Kevin Morrison a party of record for this project. His lot is approximately 260' from the outer boundary of the Holliday property but he did not get the notice. I am not sure how we generate the label list, but he was not on it. Kevin Morrison 10448 SE 1941 • Pl Renton, WA 98055 He is not happy with the application or that he almost missed his opportunity to comment -He found out yesterday from his neighbor. He will submit a comment letter by Wednesday of next week. Lcuwee,ri, N~, Seruor P~ City of Renton Planning Division 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425) 430-7294 phone {425) 430-7231 fax lnicolay@rentonwa.gov 1 Ion Arai Assistant Planner Department of Community and Econrnic Development 1055 South Grady Way Renton 98057 Mr. Arai 10-5-09 We strongly oppose the Holliday AdditionarAnimals Permit /LUA09-121. AAP. I. This property and the animals at 19405-104th Avenue S.E. is located just 35 feet from our house at 19409-104th Avenue S.E. Therefore we smell all the objectional and obnoxious fumes coming from the animals and chickens waste products. 2. The stench from the rabbits is so bad we are limited in the use of our property, house and yard. We can't open our windows to get fresh air because the animal odors come into our house. We can't enjoy social events or eating outdoors because of the smell. During the hot summer weather the strong smell of urine made us sick. Our visitors As soon as they leave their cars they complain about the smell. 3. Goats and rabbits create serious allergens. This effects the health and general welfare for us especially Mrs. Witters as she is highly allergic to animal hair causing her tQ• have asthma attacks. · · .. -· -· 4. The shelters and some pen fencing for the animals are on our western property line ; a code violation. 5. WHERE'S THE HUMANITY? The animal pen fencing area is very small as the Property at 19405-104th S.E. is only one third of an acre; much to small for goats And all the other farm animals. There is no grassy or vegatation area just barren ground. 6. WHERE'S THE HUMANITY? 67 rabbits cooped up in crowded cages sitting in Their waste. Their shelter a open tent with easy accessibility by rats and other Predators. Since the arrival of the rabbits we've seen coyotes, several raccoons and Rats in our yard next to the rabbit tent. 7. WHERE'S THE HUMANITY? The chickens are not kept in a manner that confines Their movement., We've seen the chickens upon the streets where they could get Killed. The chicken_s are often in our yard making a mess scratching, scattering the Bark and tearing the plastic ground cover.. . '. ,i, ' ' .<' , . ;: ·:·· ' ' ; ' . . . . •· ... . '"• 8. We strongly object to any FOR-PROFIT VENTURE as this is a residential area In the City of Renton. There are two families occupying the residence at 19405- 104th Avenue S.E. Their parking area is filled with a large camper, boat and traveler, another very large trailer, truck and several cars. Our point and concern is businesses create more traffic, noise and safety issues and our property will become a parking lot. It has already occurred. 9. Having a smelly farm business in our community will devalueate our property and Make it very difficult to sell our homes. For the general welfare of the residents and animals please reject The HOLLIDAY ADDITIONAL ANIMALS PERMIT/LUA09-121,AAP Respectfully yours, 111 Ill Cl ur ···k I.It !,I I\! bl M r -,---- '' ' To: IonArai Re: Holliday Additional Animals Pennit/LUA09-121, AAP Please do not allow any more animals than the city ordinance normally allows! I am concerned about the effects of this farm on such a small lot, especially by the health hazards that are already present because of the animals that are housed on the Holliday property. I have seen a coyote twice from my window, heading toward the farm, drawn by the chickens. But ifthere are no chickens outside for them to eat, they will eat just as happily any small cat or dog that may come by. And Priscilla Witters, in the house next door to the southeast, has seen 5 raccoons crossing her yard to get to the Holliday farm, and several rats which were never there before the animals came. Priscilla and her husband, who is battling cancer, are elderly and have suffered a lot from the terrible smell coming from the property. She has asthma and is allergic to rabbit fur. Furthermore, their house is right next door to the farm. As the Witters' house is at the bottom of a high ridge on their south, there is very little air circulation to move out the fumes from the area, as the prevailing winds come from the southwest. This summer was particularly bad for them and for the Willmore's (to the west of the farm) because of the stifling heat magnifying the offensive odor. Both of these families have had to leave their windows closed all summer because the smell was worse than the heat. I could smell it when I have gone to the mailboxes near the farm to get my mail, and it is dreadful. Come and smell it for yourself if you can. Maria told me that they keep the manure from the animals and compost it for their garden. So it is not just the fresh daily manure, but the rotting stuff that may be making things worse. At first there were two goats, but Maria told me that they got rid of the billy goat because it was mean. The result was the nanny goat bleating all day long because it was lonely, until a kid was born. There have been up to 4 goats there at the same time. Maria leaves the chickens out during the day to roam the neighborhood, which presents another problem: chickens are very destructive to flower beds, as they scratch for their food to turn up worms and seeds. The roots of shrubs like rhododendrons suffer a lot, as they are close to the surface. And the plastic used under the Witters' beauty bark has been torn up by their sharp claws. Another problem is the terrible noise that the newly mature young roosters make. All day long, starting at 4:30am this spring there were 5 new roosters crowing all day, waking the neighbors even with the windows shut. Finally, how could the Witters hope to sell their property so as to move, with such an undesirable situation present nearly in their front yard? Old sick folks should not have so much to worry about. My neighbors are all patient and law-abiding, but enough is enough. Please help! Thank you, ~·~ MARY MARCOITE 10314 SE 194TH PL RENTON WA 98055·7309 1.0 m ... , (i't ,,,J e..:; i,! ''l <... I\) =- -· -· --ra .. , Lm I Purpose: Animal Control Additional Animals Permit Report of Inspection LU Al'.) ~ -1-z. I_ 1 A AP To ensure the keeping of animals occurs in a humane and appropriate manner that benefits the animals and allows animals to coexist harmoniously with adjacent and abutting uses by: I. Location: 19405 1041h Ave SE 2. Type of animal I dog, 2 goats, 28 chickens and 67 rabbits 3. Quantity of animal to kept at location. _ _.,,s"'e"'e-'a"'b"'o--'-v-"-e __________ _ 4. Type of shelter Covered open air w/separate cages for rabbits. 5. Animals for foster care Yes x No ---------~-- 6. Occasional Breeder x Yes ______ No 7. Adequate ventilation x Yes ______ NO 8. Animal food storage location garage and shed in plastic containers 9. Removal of animal waste. Are there adequate provisions made for the removal of animal waste and food waste so that the area is kept free from infestation of rodents and prevent obnoxious or foul odors. x Yes No Describe means Gathered daily and mulched into vegetable garden. I 0. Past history of animal control complaints One complaint from a neighbor on chickens getting loose and odor on hot days. 11. Comments regarding observations: The animal's shelter cannot be seen from the city street. There was a slight fam1 smell in the air on the day of inspection but not what I would consider to be offensive. The animals are well cared for and the Zastoupil's seem receptive to suggestions. I entered documents showing that the chickens and goats were purchased in March of 2007. Mr. Zastoupil stated that he purchased the rabbits in the winter of 2007. The animals are used for providing milk, eggs and meat for the family and extended family. The '• Zastoupil's wish to be grandfathered to keep the animals that they currently have and not replace the adult animal once they are gone, l 2, Photos taken oflocation New pem1it X Renewal permit Approved X Date 10/29/09 T,W, Wilkinson/ 4317 Animal Control Officer Yes Yes x (Ion took photos) Yes No No X No Yes No Time 1256 hrs, - Thank you for your order. Here is your printable receipt. Click to Print Return to McMurray Hatchery Home Page Billing Info Maria k Holliday -Zastoupil 19405 104th Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 USA Shipping Info Maria k Holliday-Zastoupil 19405 104th Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 USA Shipping Method Baby birds are shipped the fastest way possible. They will be held at the Shipping Address Post Office. Payment Info Order will be charged to Visa ****152112/2009 Delivery Date Your Poultry will be delivered the week of March 05, 2007 Baby chicks will arrive Sunday through Tuesday of the week shown. Baby fowl (not chickens) will arrive Tuesday through Friday of the week shown. Your Order Item -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Price -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Qty -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COVC Coccidiosis Vaccination (Baby Chicks Only) $0.14 25 $3.50 RESP RED STAR Females (Baby birds are shipped the fastest way possible) $2.14 15 $32.10 CXRP JUMBO CORNISH X ROCKS Females (Baby birds are shipped the fastest way possible) $1.57 2 $3.14 CXRC JUMBO CORNISH X ROCKS Males (Baby birds are shipped the fastest way possible) $1.72 8 $13.76 VACC Vaccinate for Marek's Disease (Baby Chicks Only) $0.14 25 $3.50 SubTotal $56.00 Shipping $15.06 Total $71.06 Merchandise Returns Prior approval is required before merchandise can be returned. Call or write for approval. We accept merchandise for refund or exchange as long as it is in it's original carton or container, has all the appropriate literature, has not been used, and is in resalable condition. You may be subject to a handling and restocking fee of I 0% of the original cost of the item. Merchandise that is drop-shipped from the factory may be subject to additional or different terms set by the individual manufacturers. Refund will not be issued until the return item has arrived at our hatchery. Website Pricing While we have taken every precaution to insure accurate website prices, we cannot guarantee the website to be free of pricing and description errors. Also, prices may change without notice. The merchandise prices on this website supersede all prior prices. Zimbra: maria,astoupi l@comcastnet http://szO 173.ev .mail.comcastnet/:rimhra/mail I of I SmartZone Commtmications Ce, .. t:r Collaboration Suite mariazastoupil@comcast.net goat Thursday, October 15, 2009 1 :40:09 PM From: jsschleh@yahoo.com To: mariaz.astoupil@comcast.net This is to let you know that you did purchase your doeling from us in March 2007 along with a little wether boy. You paid $250 for the two of them. -Joan Schleh GardenHorne Farm Mount Vernon, WA , 10/15/2009 1:57 PM ,' '<,, ... •'. NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED)-Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: September 30, 2009 PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Holliday Additional Animals Permit/ LUA09-121, AAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant is requesting an Additional Animals Permit to allow 1 dog, 3 birds, 2 goats, 28 chickens, and 67 rabbits on a 15,142 square foot lot within the Residentlal-8 zoning designation. Per City Code, the applicant shall apply for the obtainment of an Additional Animals Permit !RMC 4-9-100] to allow for the extra animals beyond those permitted by the Code. PROJECT LOCATION: 19405 1041 h Avenue SE PUBLIC APPROVALS: Administrative Additional Animals Permit APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Maria Holliday; 194051041 h Avenue SE; Renton, WA PUBLIC HEARING: N/A Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ion Arai, Assistant Planner, Department of Community & Economic Development, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on October 14, 2009. lf you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager at {425) 430-7270. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: September 21, 2009 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED, Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. File Name/ No.: Holliday Additional Animals Permit/ LUA09-121, AAP NAME:---------------------------------- MAILING ADDRESS: _____________________________ _ TELEPHONE NO.: -------------- Denis Law Mayor September 30, 2009 Maria Holliday-Zastoupil 19405 1041h Avenue SE Renton, WA 98055 Department of Community & Economic Development Subject: Notice of Complete Application Holliday Additional Animals Permit, LUA09-121, AAP Dear Ms. Holliday-Zastoupil: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is ·complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. You will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at ( 425) 430-7270 if you have any questions. Sincerely, • Assistant Planner Renton City Hall o 1055 S_outh Grady Way o _ Rent~n; Washington 98057· o renton\Na.90v DATE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Muter Application ha• been filed and accepted with the Oepartment of Community & Economic Development {CED)-Planning DMslon of the City of Ren too. The follow\ng briefly describe• the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPllCATION; PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: September 30, 2009 Holliday Additional Animals Permit/ LUAD9·l21, AAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant is requesting an Additional Animals Permit to allow 1 dog, 3 birds, 2 goats. 28 chickens, and 67 rabbits on a 15,142 square foot lot within the Residential·& zoning deslgna!ion. Per City Code, the applicant shall apply for tl>e obtainment of an Additional Animals Permit [RMC 4-9-100] to allow for the extra animals beyond those permitted by the Code. PROJECT LOCATION: 1940S 104'" Avenue SE PUBLIC APPROVALS: Administrative Additional Animals Permit APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON Maria Holliday; 1940S 104'" Avenue SE; Renton, WA PUBL1C HEARING; N/A Comments on the above appficatlon mu,t be submitted In writing to ton Arai, As,i,ta,nt Planner, Department of Community & Economic Dev~lopment, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on October 14, 2009. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party ol record and receive additional no\;fication by mall. contact the Project Manager at (425) 430-7270. Anyone who rnbmia written comments will automatically become a party of record and wil! be notified of any decision on thi1 project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CAlLING FOR PROPER fllE IDENTIFICATION DATE Of APPLICATION: NOTICE OF COMPl£TE APPLICATION; September 21, 2009 September 30, 2009 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED, Planning Division, 1055 Soutti Grady Way, Renton. WA 98057. File Name/ No.: Holliday Additional Animals Permit/ LUA09·121, AAP NAME:-------------------------------- MAILING ADDRESS·---------------------------- TEtEPHONE NO.: ------------- CERTIFICATION SIGNED: ' . ' ' I"'• ' «; ' '' :·.,:'.I\. ,•'<\,f .,,, 'I"' Vi ,,,, ,, ' ' : "'i ',• ' ,, •,·,, ,, \'•q : ,r I , } ', ' r CITY OF RENTON ' ·. · ,. , ' ' 11,-· ""·' '; ' "! .. , 0•(:(" .,.,, •!;+'!'·•('< ,. "''.'.'!( .,. < /': , , L, )', .,c\;, 't., ,,;,;' ,'./: '.' •i,/1'11\ti, \ !YI• ! , "•··: 'b _': ,,'., ,, .•. ,, \i/ >di '. + .. , ;., k \· ', 'DEPARTMENT OF,COMMUNTV &'ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION ,, '·,, ,',C:,' .... ,. : ,,, 1;:;'i, ,AF,fll?AYIT~~~~.ij;l/l,C,E1~yryi,A.1.~,~~i•''" ,}! ,. '. . "· ' On the 30th day of September, 2009, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter & NOA documents. This information was sent to: ' ,, .)~J~1~i,,, " . ';i' .. ~ . ' ' ' ; v. « •• "·..(,, , .. :\:.:.:!,i: .. : <>,,' .. ',' ,, "'' . ' ''!'11,' "' ' , Representing (", ., " . Maria Holliday -Zastoupil Owner/ Applicant Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only See Attached (Signature of Sender): /~ '7J7 ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker ,,,,,\\\\\\11 signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for t':),_~!l,S~~m~l<l[~~,es mentioned in the instrument. .=-;<S}(;. ~ '?;\) Ji,, ''/1~ = ;J ;.:i:t, • (· ... ~1. ':,.. . .•. V ~ . f[' "·{'_ . -~-'1: % Dated: [p/1/D't • Project Name: Holliday Additional Animals Permit Project Number: LUA09-12 l, AAP ·, ,1,· .• 638800012004 CORLEY DANIEL SCOTT 19408 104TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 638800003003 FINK DANIEL E 10418 SE 196TH ST RENTON WA 98055 638800014000 HOLLIDAYZASTOUPIL MARIA 19405 104TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 638800011006 KOLOSKI JON 10405 SE 194TH PL RENTON WA 98055 638800002005 PETERSON JOHN A+ELIZABETH C 10412 SE 196TH ST RENTON WA 98058 638800022003 SNYDER RONALD D 10412 SE 194TH PL RENTON WA 98055 052205923403 WILMORE MICHAEL T +SUZETTE M 10327 SE 194TH PL RENTON WA 98055 638800008002 CRANE GEORGE W 10455 SE 195TH RENTON WA 98055 638800020007 GAUDENCIO TALOZA 10430 SE 194TH PL RENTON WA 98055 052205900609 JENKINS MONTEL R 10404 SE 194TH PL RENTON WA 98055 052205933105 MARCOTTE MARY A 10314 SE 194TH PL RENTON WA 98055 052205924302 RANDALL TERRY D+DEBORAH R 10400 SE 194TH PL RENTON WA 98055 052205900708 SUPASATIT PHI RAT +BRENDA J TRUST 10308 SE 196TH ST RENTON WA 98055 638800013002 WITTERS ROGER W+PRISCILLA J 19409 104TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055-7374 .. 638800010008 E*TRADE BANK 3476 STATESVIEW BLVD FORT MILL SC 29715 638800021005 GRUPP PATRICIA 10420 SE 194TH PL RENTON WA 98055 638800019009 JOHNSON RE 10440 SE 194TH PL RENTON WA 98055 052205923304 NEEDHAM GEORGE W 10320 SE 194TH ST RENTON WA 98055 052205924005 RUTH JOHN W 19406 102ND AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 638800009000 WARREN JOSEPH D 3941 SW MONROE SEATTLE WA 98136 638800001007 ZIELKE RANDAL C+KRISTINE M 10404 E 196TH ST RENTON WA 98055 • CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED , SEP 21 2009 ·"""·~-.--i;e. ~---= " ~ C,ty o~ ,'.'::'\ eu1te114a rnoi5 ~~fill~©IID ~ DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT City of Renton ADDITIONAL ANIMALS PERMIT APPLICAi!f1QNision 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 (then press 4) Fax: 425-430-7231 www.rentonwa.gov ALL REQUESTED ITEMS MUST BE PROVIDED IN ORDER TO PROCESS THIS ~W~[Q) Note: A fee of $SO is required at the time of application submittal. If approved, this license is valid for one year and will need to be renewed annually for a fee of $SO. 1. Property Address: / q '10.., -I 04 ',;k AvE S 6 Zip Code: 'fg' 0 5S 11 ?ST0U..f)1f.... 2. Property Owner's Name: /11/,ar,o.. no/ I I~. Daytime Phone: J./d.5 ·:3Dlo. 77 5 / 3. Pet Owner's Name (if other than above): ____________________ _ 4. Site Plan: Please provide four (4) copies of a fully-dimensioned site plan drawn at a scale of 1"=10' or 1" = 20' (or other scale approved by the City) showing the following: • Date, scale and north arrow (oriented to the top of the paper/plan sheet) • Subject property with all property lines dimensioned • Location of existing driveways, alleys, and streets abutting the subject property • Public improvements (i.e. sidewalks) adjacent to the subject line • Location of existing and proposed fencing, hedges, or retaining walls o Parking areas, driveways, and existing easements • On-site trees, topographic features or other natural features relevant to proposal • Location of proposed animal shelter(s) on property. Indicate distance in feet between shelter(s) and lot lines S. Description of facility where animals will be kept (include dimensions): E"-1 sr, N§_ O k<C I I r., 13LU. L c , hX1, l '1 c-3 oL 11t, rot-a ~, A/2,r &v / l -,b , U!fJ .3)U') ~-Pf. 6. Description of fence surrounding shelter (type, height): {p ET C 1-+At N Lt ;.J k.,j f / l.(.S A. Pou.LI tty rJ e.r c1+1CKEcl G tJ CLQSu.-t'c,E 7. Description of Animals: Number: Type (ex, cat, dog): l bOE:i $OATS Weight: "]lb.s O"Z' S ( 2.olba ,'fo//i,,s '1 lbs ' <ol RAf>& rTS (;;,lb~ Nec.oZeAl-A,..JI> R.e)(, L.of' I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington, that to 'ihe bes/ of my I Ft.en, knowledge the above information is true, correct, and complete and that the applicable requirements of the City of Renton ~ will be met. If the applicant is not the property owner, please attach the property owner's signed authorization to apply for this permit. Applicant Signature: ln.M+t..> ./1,,..J_,e, ~!Yu-bur: R H :\CED\Oata \Forms-Te mp !ates \Seff-H el p Ha ndouts\Plan n ing\Additional Ani ma Is Appl icatlon.doc 08/09 _ ... September 15, 2009 Marilyn Kamcheff Renton City Hall 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98057 Dear Marilyn Kamcheff, City of Rent Pta -on nn,ng DiVision SEP 21 zaog R e'TYcOF RENTON EIVEo SEP 21 2009 BUILDING o,v,s,oN We, my husband and I are applying for an additional animals permit. I have tried to the best of my ability to submit the required site plan drawing. I have also included a description page defining the areas by number with their function. I have include a 'bird's-eye' view of the property to give you an idea of the layout of the land as well as a blow up of the king county map with the property dimensions. The driveways are visible as well as the streets. We have no sidewalks in the area. The area that we use to house the goats and chickens was a pre-existing building. We built the pole and tarp construction for the rabbit housing. We have had our small farm since 2006 after my husband retired. He keeps the rabbits for hobby and extra income . The number of adult rabbits are 18, and the additional number are young ones ear marked for sale at the Enumclaw Auction, or to private parties for pets and 4H purposes. Our twenty eight chickens are for eggs. We do not have any roosters, just hens. They supply ourselves and our extended family, three daughters, sons in laws and 6 grandchildren with healthy fresh eggs. Each chicken has a name, courtesy of the grandchildren. The two goats supply our family with milk and milk products and keep the blackberries which grow in the neighboring property at a distance from our fence line. The entire fenced area of our property before we had the goats was covered with blackberries and we were not able to keep them under control. The more we trimmed them the better they grew! The use of this portion of our property was lost to us due to the overgrowth. By permission of the neighboring property owner we cleared a 25' by 85' area on his property that the goats browse in and keep the vegetation managed. They are also fed grains and hay. Everyday, I hand pick manure from the chicken and goat areas and place it into empty feed sacks that are removed from the enclosure and disposed of or placed into our garden bed and rototilled into the earth. There is very little smell from the animals as we keep 11(1'9' .. • them very clean and well cared for. The rabbit area is routinely cleaned as well, but not on a daily basis. When we had the animal control agent respond due to a complaint of 'odor' it was shortly after the hottest part of the summer and we had been misting the rabbits with water to keep them cool. The additional water along with the abnormally high temperatures, I believe, was composting the hay along with rabbit droppings under the rabbit cages and creating an 'odor' which is not normally present. Our very small dog Jives most of his life inside or on a leash when outdoors. The birds are caged inside as well. Please feel free to call me if you have further questions. Respectfully yours, Maria Holliday-Zastoupil Legend for drawing of existing outbuilding with animal housing I. Existing outbuilding approx. 16ft x 32ft 2. Chicken House with roosts, nest boxes and an attached covered area fenced with poultry netting to protect the chickens during inclement weather. C,~IC.l(.S. ,J ~e. 6; X ID 3. Stall for goats approx I Oft x IO ft with facilities for food and water 4. Roofed approx I Oft x 18ft for protection during inclement weather. 5. Pole and tarp enclosure for caged rabbits approx 380 sq ft. 6. Cleared and fenced area for goats and chickens to roam for exercise. This area was previously covered with weeds and blackberry vines and ~ a part of our property that we could utilize at all. 7. Area cleared on neighbors property (parcel# 0522059269) to keep blackberries away from our property line. We spoke with Mr Jan Visser and he agreed that we could clear this area and let the goats browse on his property to maintain the area free from blackberry infestation. This portion of his property is not flat but more like a shallow canyon with a year round drainage going down the middle that encourages blackberries to grow profusely. No one maintains this area. Jan Visser used to graze cows on his property, but not any longer. .. ' 1 15 FT' -p= -___ --__ :-~~--:_ --~·· =-.--:-- .i ,, ' / , ; , '1 , " '1 ------------ ' ~ .-...... 0 .... :r .... o-• -00 I. • ~ !• ~ il j I ' -· ) , ' , ' , i , N / , / Printed: 09-21-2009 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 lLand Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA09-121 Receipt Number: R0903982 Total Payment: #1273 09/21/2009 12:22 PM 50.00 Payee: MARIA HOLLIDAY-ZASTOUPIL Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 50.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 1273 50.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 DO NOT USE -USE 3954 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .oo .oo .00 .oo .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .oo .oo .00 .00 y King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Setvi~s (DOES) Land Use Services Division (LUSD) 900 Oakesdale Av. SW Renton Washington 98055-1219 ~~ TYPE2 FILE CONTENTS / LOGmlN SHEET (For Variances, Conditional Uses, Reasonable Uses, Short Plats, Shoreline SD/VA, Binding Site Plan) FILE NO.: L04S0065 PROJECT I FILE NAME: YEE Short Plat OWNER(S): Fanny & Philip Yee REVIEW PLANNER: Fereshteh Dehkordi REVIEW ENGINEER: Curt Foster APPLICATION FILED: December 27, 2004 AGENT(S): DeEn Lang, Lang Assoc. Inc. COMPLETE APPLICATION DATE: 1h-& S-- A. PRELIMINARY. FINAL AND RECORDED ACTIONS B: 1. Notice of Decision Date: ·~/-31 /6t, 2. Preliminary Approval Date: 3. Revision: 4. Recording No.: HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTIONS (If Applicable.) If Appeal Filed: D (recvd date): ____ _ Pre-Hearing & Hearing Date(s): ___ _ Examiner's Action and date signed: 1. PreHearing Notice, dated: 2. PreHearing Order, dated: 2. Continuation, dated: 4. Examiner's Report, dated: 5. Reconsideration, dated: 6. Appeal Summary, dated: Appeal Receipt -D C. DDES RECOMMENDATION LETTER. NOTICE AND STAFF REPORTS 1. Recommendation Letter: 2. Appeal Report: 3. Addendum Report: S.E.P .A. Requirements (if applicable) X Threshold Determination Type: 2. Date Determination Issued: . / t,,k" 500' Owners/ SD/ or Agenc,ies Mailing Sent: 50l (Ob 4. Appeal Filed on Determination: D -No· D -Yes 5. Appeal Statement(s): From: 6. Appeal Response(s): From: (DNS~S) Date recvd: Date sent: c:J'-NOTICE REQUIREMENTS 1. 2. Notice of Application / /. a. Affidavit of Posting sent: 1 /Lff/~ S"-' b. Legal Ads: Seattle fi/~ /7 Local ( ~ a--1<' c. 500' owners'/ SD/ agencies' mailings sent: Recvd: Date Published: ) / %r Published: cf?// ,J- Notice of Decision ~/) .----3 a. 500' owners' I SD/ agencies' mailings sent:_ u) { ~ " . "'i , __ , & COMPLETE APPLICATION ITEMS Date Received: December 27, 2004 0 Intake Checklist, Application 2. Application Fee Info. A: Applicant Designation Form A. Legal Description 5. Assessor's Maps: v&. Certificate of Water Availability ~ Certificate of Sewer Availability 8. Preliminary Health Approval 9. Certificate of Future Connection ...,H). Fire District Receipt ~Site Plan (Platting) Map fl. Legal Lot Proof . ..,..1'3. Sensitive Areas Compliance Affidavit ,.....f-21_ Environmental Checklist _...i-5. Transportation Concurrency / ,G)t..E/1A-/>T7~/V vf6. Level One Drainage Analysis ~7. Other(s~: ~Jz~PhM~e» $TlluT 18. Waiver(s): a. b. IF APPLICABLE TO FILE BEING REVIEWED: 19. Right-of-Way Use Permit, File No.: 20. Variance, File No.: 21. Rezone, File No.: 22. Shoreline File No. 23. Others -File No(s). · L04S0065 c) ADDITIONAL PLANS/ MAPS 1. Conceptual Drainage Plan i-hd-t? /Pl},;7~¥ 4/)/v;:J / ftt1~ l.!~/tJ6 2. Wetland Mitigation Pl~n_ ' ~ . ', -j '/.;. ~therMap(s) a) KE)/~/) ~-6,0;£,Z.,-N 7-~x . b) ~ c) d) (jj) SPECIAL STUDIES vi. Wetland I Stream Report: 2. GeoTechnical Report: 3. Traffic Study: 4, Wildlife Study: Other(s): L04S0025 Page 2 of 3 j ·-~ L04S0065 0 1. 2. 3. 5. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 17.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.f-::a:::?7~, ~ 18. _________________________ _ 19. _________________________ _ 20. _________________________ _ 21. _________________________ _ 22. _________________________ _ 23. _________________________ _ 24. __ ~----------------------- 25. _________________________ _ 26. _________________________ _ 27. _________________________ _ 28. _________________________ _ 29. _________________________ _ 30. _________________________ _ 31. _________________________ _ 32. _________________________ _ 33. _________________________ _ 34. _________________________ _ 35. _________________________ _ 36. -------------------------- 37. _________________________ _ 38. -------------------------- 39. ---------,---------------------- 40. -------------------------- 41. -------------------------- 42. -------------------------- 43. -------------------------- 44. -------------------------- 45. -------------------------- L04S0025 Page 3 of 3 ~- ' \. Denis Law Mayor Department of Community and Economic Development · April 13, 2011 · · · . Alex Pietsch, Administrator · Anthony Ford Heidi Kuehleni 413 South 47th Street Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: HITONE SHORT PLAT {LUA09-122) Dear Mr. Ford & Ms. Kuehlenz, This office has reviewed your request (dated February 15, ~Oll)"to extend an approved short plat (File No. LUA09-122) pursuant to RMC 4-7-07011/L Specifically, the municipal code allows the original approving body to issue a single one (i) year extension: ' < • • ' · As the decision was issued on M~rch 31, 2009, your request offebruary 15th is timely. F~rther, _ you note in your correspondence tha_t you are having difficillty moving forward at this time due · to economic ·conditions. Therefore, your request .is.'reasonable._ ·' · . You should_ be aware this office is empowered to issue only' one such extension. If the final short plat is ~ot r~coraed February 15, 20li it will expire and cannot be extended again. · . Therefore, your short plat extension request is approved. The short platwill expire on February 15, 2012. ' ' . Please ie~I free to contact Roca le Timmons at (425)-430-7219.should you have any further . questions or comments regarding this extension. . Sincerely, ~to~u~- Jennife, Toth Henning, AICP Planning Ma_nager cc: -Chip yincent; Pl~nning Director Neil Watts, Development Services Director Rocale Timl'Tlons, Associate Planner . . Stacy T~cker, secret~ry Carrie Olson Project File . '. Renton City Hall. o i 055 South Grady Way o Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov ,-., I February 15,2011 Mr. Chip Vincent Planning Service Director Of City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton Wa 98057 Re: Hitone short plat LUA09-122 Mr. Vincent CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED fEB 15 2011 BUILDING DIVISION We are the current owner's of the Hitone short plat LUA09-122. It was transferred from the King county. To the city of Renton. We are requesting a extension on are short plat due to the economy and the financial burden that it would cost us we feel at this point and time with the employment rate as high as it been it would be loss for us move forward. Difficult task that creates a situation where all party's involved would not be a win situation We would appreciate your consideration. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call us Best regards Anthony Ford 206-9191. 0:791 Jr~ (,\./ Heidi Kuehlenz 206-669-0961 Owner's of the Hitone short plat 413 S 47th st Renton Wa 98005 • .,~, CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: December 29, 2009 To: City Clerk's Office From: City Of Renton Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office = I Project Name: Yee Short Plat LUA (file) Number: LUA-09-122, SHPL-A I Cross-References: King Co. File #L04S0065 AKA's: Hitone Short Plat Project Manager: Rocale Timmons Acceptance Date: January 17, 2005 Applicant: Fanny & Philip Yee 1 Owner: Same as applicant I Contact: Same as applicant PID Number: 6199000126, 6199000127 j ERC Decision Date: March 31, 2006 ERC Appeal Date: April 24, 2006 Administrative Approval: March 31, 2006 Appeal Period Ends: April 24, 2006 Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: ' Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: j Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: A short subdivision of .96-acre site (two tax parcels) into six (6) lots for detached single-family dwellings in the R-6 zone. \ Location: 12052 SE 129th Place I Comments: I y ( --.. (i1 • ~ YEE/HITONE SHORT PLAT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LUA 09-122 Project Condition Source of When Compliance is Party Condition Required Responsible Improve 120'" Avenue SE, from the plat entrance in the 19000 block SEPA Prior to engineering Applicant/ northward to the intersection of 1881 h Street/1201 h Ave SE by providing plan approval Builder a paved walkway along the easterly side of 100'" Ave SE. The walkway, per Section 3.09 of the KCRS shall be selected and designed by the Applicant's engineer in accordance within any one of the following standards: • A full width of (8 feet) paved shoulder • A paved shoulder no less than 4 feet, separated by vehicle traffic by either extruded curb or an unpaved gravel shoulder strip • A concrete curb and gutter and sidewalk section The following note shall be placed on the face of the short plat: "All Admin Prior to the recording Applicant/ building downspouts, footing drains and drains from all impervious of the short plat and Builder surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the at Building Permit permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings# ___ on file with the City of Renton. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots designated for perforated stubouts, dispersion, or infiltration systems, the designs shall be constructed at the time of building permit and shall comply with the plans on file." Provide proof that assures the offsite conveyance will be constructed Admin Prior to engineering Applicant/ and located in easements where appropriate (on the adjacent plan approval Builder property to the east). If the conveyance is not available a revision shall be submitted with new conceptual drainage plan. This would constitute a major change and the applicant would be required to comply with the current SWDM (20.20.080 KKC) A note conveying an equally undivided responsibility (to each future Admin Prior to the recording Applicant/ lot owner) for the off site maintenance cost (for roadway and facilities of the short plat Builder within the easement) shall be place on the face of the short plat or Y£LU>IN liL£ c11pY Compliance Notes Signature/Date I .. ( ,, Yee/Hi tone Short Plat Conditions of Approval Page 2 of 3 recorded separately. The note shall include a statement allowing the maintenance responsibility to be modified if agreed to by all beneficiaries of the original easement including right of way dedication to a public agency. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval Pay MPS fee at the time of Short Plat recording or at the time of building permit application. lf fee paid at recording at note to that effect shall be placed on the face of the short plat. A detailed recreation space plan shall be submitted for review and approval. Must show a 10-foot wide utility easement, no toy structure within the easement and the tract shall be fully fenced. A Homeowners Association shall be established that provides maintenance for the recreation tract. A note shall be placed on the final short plat indicating the trees shown to be retained on the tree retention plan shall be maintained by future owners of the proposed lots, consistent with KCC21A.38.230B6. Please note that the tree retention plan shall be included as part of the final engineering plans for the subject plat. Street trees shall be planted 40 feet on center along the frontage of all roads Haul hours are limited from 8:30 am to 3:30 pm Monday through Friday Within 30 days of completion of grading work the applicant shall hydroseed or plant appropriate vegetation. Construction hours are from 7:00 am to 8:00 pm Monday through Friday and 9:00 am to 8:00 pm on Saturday and no work is allowed on Sundays. Admin Prior to engineering plan approval Admin Prior to the recording of the short plat or at the time of building permit approval Admin Concurrent with engineering plan review or prior to short plat recording Admin Prior to the recording of the short plat Admin Prior to the recording of the short plat Code Prior to final building permit inspection Code During Project Construction Code During Project Construction Code During Project Construction Expires 3-31-2011; Vested R-6 King County Development Standards include, but not limited to, the following: Applicant/ Builder Applicant/ Builder Applicant/ Builder Applicant/ Builder Builder Applicant/ Builder Builder Contractor/ Builder Contractor/ Builder ,. .r 'I Yee/Hi tone Short Plat Conditions of Approval Page 3 of 3 Develo~ment Standard Lot Size Lot Width Lot Depth Street setback (FY or SYAS) Attached Garage Setback Detached Structures Interior Setbacks (SY or RY) Building Height Lot Coverage Landscaping Recreation Roads Surface Water cc City of Renton File LUA 09-122 Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Jan Illian, Plan Reviewer Reguirement None 30 feet None 10 for primary structure (see garage below) 20 feet for entrance City of Renton Code S feet 35 feet 70 percent Per approved plan Per approved plan 1993 KC Roads 1998 Surface Water I ' ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 March 31, 2006 Fanny and Philip Yee 11431 2381h Street Woodway, WA 98020 ' RE: Preliminary Approval for Short Subdivision No. L04S0065 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Yee: The Land Use Services Division (LUSD) has completed review of the short subdivision application captioned above. The LUSD finds that the proposed short subdivision complies with the King County Land Segregation Code (Title 19A), Zoning Code (Title 21A), and other applicable codes as specified in King County Code (KCC) 19A.08.060. The short subdivision is granted preliminary approval subject to the Conditions of Preliminary Approval attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Any aggrieved party may appeal this decision by the appeal deadline, which is April 24, 2006. The appeal procedure is enclosed for your information. The preliminary approval is valid for a period of 60 months from the date of this letter, unless an appeal is filed. In the event that an appeal is filed, the preliminary approval is valid for a period of 60 months from the date of the appeal decision. Enclosed are the following: o Notice of Decision o Conditions of Preliminary Approval o Appeal Procedure If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Fereshteh Dehkordi, Program Manager, at (206) 296-7173 and Curt Foster, Engineer, at (206) 296-7106. Sanders, Development Engineer Engineering Review Section, LUSD Enclosures cc: De En Lang, Consulting Engineer Applicant File Letter.frm/CoverLtr2000.SP.doc 3/9/00 iWl~~ Lisa Dinsmore, Supervisor Current Planning Section, LUSD ' \ ® KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Re_nton, WA 98055-1219 REPORT AND DECISION SHORT SUBDIVISION File No. L04S0065 A. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED SHORT SUBDIVISION: B. This is a short subdivision of .96-acre site (two tax parcels) into six (6) lots for detached single-family dwellings in the R-6 zone. The proposed density is 6 dwelling units per acre. The proposed lot sizes range from approximately 3000 square feet to 5,300 square feet Refer to Attachment 1 for a copy of the short plat map. GENERAL INFORMATION: Owner/Applicant: Consulting Engineer: STR: Location: Zoning: Acreage: Number of Lots: Density: Lot Size: Proposed Use: Sewage Disposal: Water Supply: Fire District: School District: Date Submitted: Fanny and Philip Yee 11431 2381h Street Woodway WA 98020 Lang Associates, Inc. 10658 Riviera Place NE Seattle, WA 98125 SW Y. 33-23-05 12052 SE 129th Place R-6 .96 acre 6 6 du/acre Ranges from 3000 to 5,300 square feet Residential Soos Creek Water and Sewer District Soos Creek Water and Sewer District Fire District 40 Renton School District Complete Application Date: December 27, 2004 January 17, 2005 C. HISTORY and BACKGROUND The Subdivision Technical Committee (STC) of King County has conducted an on-site examination of the subject property. The STC has discussed the proposed development with the applicant to clarify technical details of the application and to determine the compatibility of this project with applicable King County plans, codes, and other official documents regulating this development. As a result of preliminary discussions, the applicant presented the Technical Com.mittee with a revised site plan on January 9, 2006. The revision to address some of the technical issues was minor. No change to the road or lot layout was made. Report and Decision -I -L04S0065 D. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 1. Topography: The site slopes down gently from west to east. The maximum slope is3%. 2. Soils: One soil type is found on this site per King County Soil Survey, 1973. The entire site is classified AgB. The following are characteristics of AgB soils: AgB -Alderwood gravely, sandy loam; 0-6% slopes. Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight. This soil type has moderate limitations for low building foundations due to a seasonally high water table, and severe limitations for septic tank filter fields due to very slow permeability in the substratum. 3. Wetlands: A wetland and report was prepared by Altmann Oliver Associates dated December 22, 2004. The report identified a small (175 sq.ft.) isolated shallow wetland partly on site. This wetland is exempt from regulation. The site lies within the Soos Creek drainage basin. 4. Vegetation: This site is primarily covered in grasses. Scattered evergreen and deciduous trees and sherubs occur in limited numbers. 5. Wildlife: Small birds and animals may inhabit this site; however, their population and species are limited due to nearby development. No threatened or endangered species are known to exist on or near the property. 6. The Sensitive Areas Folio does not identify any mapped sensitive areas as being present on this site. E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The property lies within a gradually urbanizing area east of the City of Renton. The proposed subdivision of Fleuve Des Voies, KC File L04P0002, with 38 residential lots is on parcels east of the site and is currently under review by DDES. There are larger lots with potential for re-subdivision to the west and north of the site. The properties south of the site are developed with single family residences. The site and the surrounding parcels are zoned Residential (R-6) with six dwelling units per acre. The proposed subdivision site is undeveloped. F. DESIGN FEATURES 1. Lot Pattern and Density: The proposed density and lot layout meets the density requirements of R-6 and the Short Subdivision Code. 2. Access/Roadway Section: The site obtains access to 1201h Avenue SE via a 30- foot wide easement extending east from the road to the site. The easement will be improved to an urban minor access road standards consisting of curb, gutter and sidewalks on the north side of the road. 3. Drainage: Currently drainage from the property leaves the site in the form of sheet flow. After development, storm water runoff (from the proposed under ground vault) will be conveyed eastward (same direction) to a proposed development on the neighboring property. The applicant has received a letter of agreement from the property owner directly east of the site to allow a drainage easement across his property for this purpose. The on-site vault will be located in the southeast corner of the property. It will be designed for Level II flow control and basic water quality (1998 Surface Water Design Manual). 3. Other Design Features: The proposal includes a 3, 173-square-foot recreation tract located southeast of the site. This tract will be improved with landscaping and a toy structure for the benefit of the subdivision's future residents. Report and Decision -2 -L04S0065 G. PUBLIC SERVICES 1. · Sewage Disposal: The applicant proposes to serve the subject subdivision by means of a public sewer system managed by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. A Certificate of Sewer Availability, dated December 2004 indicates this sewer district's capability to serve the proposed development. 2. Water Supply: The applicant proposes to serve the subject subdivision with a public water supply and distribution system managed by the Soos Creek Water and sewer District. A Certificate of Water Availability dated December 17, 2004 indicates this water district's capability to serve the proposed development. 3. School facilities: The subject subdivision will be served by Benson Elementary, Nelson Middle, and Lindberg Senior High Schools, all located within the Renton School District. 4. . School Access: The District has indicated that the future students from this subdivision will walk to Benson Elementary and the middle and high school students will be bussed from the intersections of 120th Avenue SE and SE 188th Street and from the intersection of SE 1881h and 1161 h Avenue SE respectively. Currently, there are no sidewalks along 1201h Avenue SE to its intersection with SE 1881" Street. Sidewalk improvements are expected along SE 188th Street by other subdivision proposals in the area. This improvement together with the required off-site pedestrian improvements (See SEPA condition below) will complete a contfnuous walkway facility from the site to the school bus pick up areas. 5. Parks and Recreation Space: The nearest public park is Soos Creek Park located along SE 192nd Street a few miles southeast of the site. KCC 21 A.14 requires subdivisions in the UR and R zone classifications to either provide on- site recreation space or pay a fee to the Parks Division for establishment and maintenance of neighborhood parks. At this time, the applicant is proposing to provide a 3,100 square-foot recreation tract on the site. The site of the recreation tract is encumbered by the Soos Creek utility easement. The Soos Creek Water and Sewer District has agreed to reduce the easement width to 10-foot wide for the water main. The District has no objection to development of a recreation tract on the easement provided no toy structure is anchored within the easement, see attachment 2. KCC 21 A.14.190 requires subdivisions to provide tot/children play areas within the recreation space on-site. The proposal must include a 270-square-foot play area with the required recreation tract. The recreation tract plan must be reviewed and approved by the Soos Creek Utility District. G. SEPA THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21 C, the responsible official of the LUSD issued a mitigated threshold determination of non-significance (MONS) for the proposed development on March 24, 2006. This determination was based on the review of the environmental checklist and supporting documentation filed with the application, resulting in the conclusion that the proposal would not cause probable significant adverse impacts on the environment provided the following measures are attached to the project as conditions: In accordance with the requirements with RCW 58.17 .110 (2), the Applicant shall improve 120th Avenue SE, from the plat entrance in the 19000 block northward to the intersection of SE 188th Street/120th Avenue SE by providing a paved walkway along the easterly side of 120th Avenue SE. The walkway, per Section 3.09 of the KCRS shall be selected and designed by the Applicant's engineer in accordance with any one of the following standards, and upon approval by DOES, constructed: Report and Decision -3 -L04S0065 H. A. A full width (8 feet) paved shoulder B. A paved shoulder of no less than four (4) feet in width, separated by vehicle traffic by either an extruded curb or an unpaved gravel shoulder strip C. A concrete curb and gutter, and sidewalk section FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS: The subject subdivision will comply with the goals and objectives of the King County Comprehensive Plan and will comply with the re_quirements of the Subdivision and Zoning Codes and other official land use controls of King County (e.g. 1993 King County Road Standards, 1998 Surface Water Design Manual, etc.), based upon the conditions for final short plat approval. I. DECISION: The proposed Short Plat revised and received January 9, 2006 (Attachment 1) is granted preliminary approval subject to the following conditions of final approval: 1. 2. 3. 4. The proposal shall comply with all platting provisions of King County Title 19A. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final short subdivision. All utilities within proposed rights-of-way must be included within a franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final short plat recording 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) (KCC 9)-The proposed short plat qualifies for full drainage review as outlined in Chapter One of the SWDM. Final short plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. A professional civil engineer licensed in the State of Washington shall prepare drainage plans and a technical information report as outlined in Chapter 2 of the drainage manual. The drainage plan submittal shall demonstrate compliance with all applicable Core and Special Requirements. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved short plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval, which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. A. Engineering plans and analysis shall comply with the SWDM. Prior to short plat recording, the applicant shall submit engineering plans to address the required short plat improvements. King.County approval of drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. Permit fees for review and inspection shall be paid as required by County codes and policies. Bonding for the drainage plans will also be established as determined by ODES prior to plan approval. After receiving drainage plan approval, the applicant shall contact the ODES Land Use Inspection Section to schedule a pre-construction meeting prior to performing work on the site. B. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by DOES Engineering Review shall be shown on the engineering plans. C. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: "All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings # on file with DOES and/or the Department of Transportation. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any Report and Decision -4 -L04S0065 5. building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots designated for perforated stubouts, dispersion, or infiltration systems, the designs shall be constructed at the time of the building permit and shall comply with the plans on file." SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: The conceptual drainage plan for this short plat proposes to discharge surface water run-off into a future piping system. The future piped conveyance would be constructed and located on the adjacent property to the east under a proposed subdivision application (L04P0002). Prior to engineering plan approval, the applicant shall provide proof that assures the offsite conveyance will be constructed and located in easements where appropriate. D. Should the proposed offsite conveyance not be available at engineering review, and prior to plan approval the applicant shall submit a revision to this application with a new conceptual drainage plan. Since this will require a substantial change this project may be re-vest to the current SWDM (20.20.080 KKC). 1993 King County Road Standards (KCRS) (KCC 14)-Final short plat approval shall require full compliance with the provisions set forth in the King County Road Standards (KCRS), including engineering plans for all road and site improvements. The engineering plans shall be prepared by a professional civil engineer licensed in the state of Washington. DOES strongly recommends that the engineering plans be submitted at least two years prior to the expiration date of the project. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads within this short plat shall comply with the following requirements unless otherwise approved by ODES (KCRS Section1 .03). A. The proposed road and cul-de sac serving the property shall be constructed to urban minor access street standard per KCRS, Section 2.03. It shall extend from 1201h Avenue SE and continue into the site terminating into a cul-de-sac bulb as shown on the site plan per KCRS Section 2.08. B. The off-site portion of the road improvements may remain in the existing easement. A note conveying an equally undivided responsibility (to each future lot owner) for the offsite maintenance cost (for roadway and facilities within the easement) shall be placed on the final recorded map page or recorded separately. Additionally, the note shall include a statement allowing the maintenance responsibility to be modified if agreed to by all beneficiaries of the original easement including right of way dedication to a public agency. C. The on-site improvements shall be placed in a tract. The tract shall be an undivided ownership to the lots it serves, and the lot owners shall be responsible for its maintenance. D. The proposed road improvements shall address the requirements for road surfacing outlined in KCRS Chapter 4. As noted in section 4.01 F, full width pavement overlay is required where widening existing asphalt. E. Modifications to the above road conditions may be considered by King County pursuant to the variance procedures in KCRS 1.08. F. The following notes shall be shown on the final recorded short subdivision: Report and Decision -5 -L04S0065 6. 7. 8. 9. 10 (1) All private easements and/or tracts to be maintained, repaired, and/or rebuilt by the owners of the parcels having legal access there from and their heirs, assigns or successors, unless and until such roads are improved to King County standards and are dedicated and accepted by King County for maintenance. (2) All restrictions, easements, tracts, and their purpose shall be shown on the final recorded short subdivision. Health (KCC 13)-This project is exempt from further King County Heath Department review. However, if improvements are required from the Sewer and/or the Water District, then verification shall be required from said District(s) that the improvements have been bonded and/or installed, prior to final recording of the short plat. Building and Construction Standards (Title 16)-The applicant shall comply with all applicable provisions of KCC 16.82. including the significant tree retention requirements. Fire Code (KCC 17) -Section 902 of the 1997 Edition of Uniform Fire Code The applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main and fire flow standards of Chapter 17 .08 of the King County Code prior to the final short plat approval. Density and Dimensions {KCC 21A.12) -All lots shall meet the density and dimensions requirements of the R-6 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary short subdivision, whichever is larger. Minor revisions to the short subdivision, which do not result in substantial changes and/or do not create additional lots may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services. Street Trees (KCC 21 A.16) -Street trees shall be provided as follows (per KCRS 5.03 and KCC 21A.16.050): A. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. B. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. C. If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. D. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the County has adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. E. The species of trees shall be approved by ODES if located within the right-of-way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. F. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by ODES prior to engineering plan approval. Report and Decision -6 -L04S0065 G. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DOES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. 11. Sensitive Areas (KCC 21A.24)-The small size Class Ill wetland located near the northeast property line is exempt from the Sensitive area requirements. 12. Road Mitigation Payment System -The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply.with Road Mitigation Payment System (MPS), King County Code 14.75, by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by King County Department of Transportation. The applicant has an option to either: A. Pay the MPS fee at final short plat recording. If this option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of short plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the short plat that reads, "All fees required by King County code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS) have been paid." Or B. Pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If this option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of the building permit application. 13. Recreation Tract. KCC 21A.14-As shown on the site plan, a recreation tract shall be provided consistent with the requirements of KCC 21A.14.180 and KCC 21A.14.190 (i.e., sport court[s], children's play equipment, picnic table(s]. benches, etc.). A detailed recreation space plan (i.e., landscape specs, equipment specs, etc.) consistent with KC 21A.16 shall be submitted for review and approval by ODES and King County Parks prior to submittal of the final plat documents or concurrent with the Engineering Review phase. The recreation plan must show only a 10-foot wide easement within the tract as agreed by the Soos Creek Utility District. No toy structure shall be placed within the 10-foot wide utility easement. The recreation tract shall be fully fenced. A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording of the plat. 14. A homeowner's association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction of ODES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the recreation tract. 15. To implement KCC 21A.38.230 which applies to the site, a detailed tree retention plan shall be submitted with the engineering plans for the subject plat. The tree retention plan and the engineering plans shall be consistent with the requirements of KCC 21A.38.230, as well as the conceptual tree retention plan which is part of the hearing record for this project. No clearing of the subject property is permitted until the final tree retention plan is approved by LUSD. Flagging and temporary fencing of trees to be retained shall be provided, consistent with KCC 21A.38.230B4. The placement of impervious surfaces, fill material, excavation work, or the storage of construction materials is prohibited within the fenced areas around preserved trees, except for grading work permitted pursuant to KCC 21A.38.230B4d(2). A note shall be placed on the final plat indicating that the trees shown to be retained on the tree retention plan shall be maintained by the future owners of the proposed lots, consistent with KCC 21A.38.230B6. Please Note that the tree retention plan shall be included as part of the final engineering plans for the subject plat. Report and Decision -7 -L04S0065 16. The following has been established under SEPA: In accordance with the requirements with RCW 58.17.110 (2), the Applicant shall improve 120th Avenue SE, from the plat entrance in the 19000 block northward to the intersection of SE 188th Street/120th Avenue SE by providing a paved walkway along the eastward side of 120th Avenue SE. The walkway, per Section 3.09 of the KCRS, shall be selected and designed by the Applicant's engineer in accordance with any one of the following standards, and upon approval by ODES, constructed. A. A full width (8 feet) paved shoulder B. A paved shoulder of no less than four (4) feet in width, separated by vehicle traffic by either an extruded curb or an unpaved gravel shoulder strip C. A concrete curb and gutter, and sidewalk section Other Considerations A. Preliminary approval of this application does not limit the applicant's responsibility to obtain any required permit or license from the State or other regulatory body. This may include, but not be limited to, obtaining a forest practice permit, an HPA permit, building permits, and other types of entitlements as necessitated by circumstances. B. The short subdivision shall conform to KCC 16.82 relating to grading on private property. C. Development of the subject property may require registration with the Washington State Department of Licensing, Real Estate Division Parties and Persons of Interest: BULEN, BRENDA & KEN 19007 120TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98058 BUSH, BEN & GERALDINE 19124 121ST PLACE SE RENTON, WA 98058 LABRIE, ERIC ESM CONSUL TING ENGINEERS 720 S 348TH STREET FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 LANG ASSOCIATES DE EN LANG 10658 RIVIERA PLACE NE SEATTLE, WA 98125 YEE, FANNY & PHILIP 11431-238TH STREET WOODWAY, WA 98020 CLAUSSEN, KIM PROGRAM MANAGER Ill DDES/LUSD DEHKORDI, FERESHTEH PROJECT MANAGER II DDES/LUSD FOSTER, CURT SR. ENGINEER DDES/LUSD LISA DINSMORE, SUPERVISOR, CURRENT PLANNING SECTION JIM SANDERS, DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER< ENGINEERING REVIEW SECTION Report and Decision -8 -L04S0065 Appeal Information and Parties of Record RIGHT TO APPEAL This action may be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner, with a fee of $250 (check payable to King County Office of Finance). As required by KCC 20.20.090 and 20.24.090, the appeal period shall be twenty one (21) calendar days and shall commence on the third day after the notice of decision is mailed . . Filing an appeal requires actual delivery to the King County Land Use Services Division prior to the close of business (4:30 p.m.) on April 24, 2006. Prior mailing is not sufficient if actual receipt by the Division does not occur within the applicable time period. The Examiner does not have authority to extend the time period unless the Division is not open on the specified closing date, in which event delivery prior to the close of business on the next business day is sufficient to meet the filing requirement. If a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall file a statement of appeal ~ithin a 21-day calendar period commencing three days after the notice of decision is mailed. The statement of appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including file number) and the alleged errors in that decision. The statement of appeal shall state: 1) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the statement of appeal. Failure to timely file a notice of appeal, appeal fee, or statement of appeal deprives the Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Appeals must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services, addressed as follows: LAND USE APPEAL Land Use Services Division Department of Development and Environmental Services . Black River Corporate Park 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Any party may make a request for a pre-hearing conference. For more information regarding appeal proceedings and pre-hearing conferences, please contact the Office of the Examiner for a Citizens' Guide to the Examiner Hearings and/or read KCC 20.20 and 20.24. Report and Decision -9 -L04S0065 :OVALS: RECORDING NO. "'"""'-"(' ,, ... _ MENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND EN'IIRONMENTAL SER'IICES :t and approved thle --day of 20 __ Examinad Qnd approved ~a --day of 20 __ • Land Uee SerAces DMslon -d and approved this __ day of ----~ 20 __ Deputy Annaor n-,t Engln._. Ac:::count Number ----------- S.E. 188th ST. • CASED MON .. NO MARr--OFFSETS FOR t.lON. 'ON) ,.. I ~ s ~ ... '-(") ~I I C! s: i m -0 ,, ~ i 6199000041 RS-6-50 .. 0 " .. "'° SCALE: 1 " = 50' PORTION Of SE 1/4 of SW 1/4, S. 33 T. 23 N., R. 5 E., W.M. EXISTING LOTS I I N _J.28.>s 6199000050 RS-6-50 ~ INJ(tj) Rir IHI 6199000059 RS-6-50 Houco 1 ,; '//(///////////, I / I FOUND REBAR i '( AND C,.,. LS 18898 \ 0.36' N. OF LINE 6199000080 RS-6-50 12' D~A Ir:! '.;r STAND ,<>. T ' / 5 6199000125 ~PE ~ = '\ A _ J.; l -RS-6-50 I 3" -, * -i p -~ I -• ¢ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'I ~ TRACT 6 ~oo· 5--~II ' ? 6199000120 VOL. 47, PAGE 90 J I / ;"! RS-6-50 ~ I 30' EASEMENT FOR ----INGRESS, EGRESS. --- l.LJ !;! \1l I DRAINAGE AND UTIUTIES ~ I 11 \ I I REC. NO. 7810060608 ' ::t: b N .... G ~-"' _--:::1 J? -' 343..01 jj 0 0 0 ' l N 89'U9'20" "fl I ru I o C I ,,-, BM E IN POWER P<X.E '· 505.27 ~JG ! 106 , I I 6199000142 I RS-6-50 ~,~ :c LEGEND -1-6199000140 I 'a_ =POWER Pot£ RS-6-50 0 BOUARD 1'° M WA 1ER VAf.1/E I .Q FIRE HYDRANT ijj) WAlER MElER .... "' "' ~ ij I I I -g 8 \ ;., -0 ~ Jr--=-.w.t1and..,.., ~"tlr. 175 Sq. Fl .. LOT 1.1> LOT 2 ~ z An" ~ PRIVATE STREET R£CRfA TION SP AC1: 6199000220 'f RS-6-50 , -6199000210 RS-6-50 ~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION lRACT 6, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN lRACTS, DIVISION NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 47 OF PLATS, PAGE 90, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE WEST 343.00 FEET THEREOF. ,FOUND 2• IRON PIPE 3(J WATER MAIN E~-1;:;\ REC. NO. 7810020168 :::!,2.J I um! I?' J> @ 0 'Z _p 0 in (I) "'Q tJI> ···= ~ $ r g ~ rtiJ g g ~ 01< · SOOS CREEK WAT.1_ & SEWER DISTRICT 14616 S.E. 192nd St. • P.O. Box 58039 • Renton, WA 98058-1039 • Phone (253) 630-9900 • Fax (253) 630-5289 September 1, 2005 Ms. Fanny Yee RE: Short Plat Dear Fanny: oo~©~OW~[Q) · JAN O 9 20~3 .. K.C. D.D.E.S. JL04S0065 / This letter is in response to your request for a letter to reduce a JO-foot construction easement that Soos Creek now holds for the installation of a water line to a IO-foot easement. , Soos Creek will require a minimum of a JO-foot easement for the installation of the water line; · however, we have no problem reducing that to a I 0-foot easement after the line is constructed. The easement we are discussing is from Alaskan House Movers to King County Water District No. 58 (33-23-5-21). Sincerely, Q4t{~ Ron Speer District Manager RS:lks C:\Linda\LElTERS\FannyYce.doc www.snoscrcck.cnn1 ATTACHMENT~2..~- \ QF_,;..,, -==-- PAGE PAGE Date of Issuance: Project: Location: King County Department of Development and Environmental Services State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Mitigated Determination Of Significance Yee Short Plat, File No. L04S0065 March 31, 2006 short subdivision of .96-acre site (two tax parcels) into six (6)residential lots and construction of the associated roads, utilities drainage and recreation facilities. King County Permits: 12052 SE 1291h Place Short Subdivision County Contact: Proponent: Zoning: Drainage Subbasin: Section/fownship/Range: Notes: F ereshteh Dehkordi (206) 296-7173 Fanny and Philip Yee 11431 238'h Street Woodway WA 98020 Residential, 6du/acre Soos Creek SW V. 33-23-5 A. This finding is based on review of the project site plan dated January 9, 2006; Conceptual Drainage Plan dated March I, 2006 environmental checklist dated December 24, 2004; Technical Information Report dated December 27, 2004; Wetland delineation report dated December 22, 2004 and other documents in the file. B. Issuance of this threshold determination does not constitute approval of the permit. This proposal will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable King County codes which regulate development activities, including the Uniform Fire and Building Codes, Road Standards, Surface Water Design Manual, and the Sensitive Areas Regulations. Threshold Determination The responsible official finds that the above described proposal does not pose a probable significant adverse impact to the environment, provided the mitigation measures listed below are applied as li\llAII\I FILE COPY L04S0065 March 31, 2006 Page 2 conditions of permit issuance. This finding is made pursuant to RCW 43.21C, KCC 20.44 and WAC 197-11 after reviewing the environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency and considering mitigation measures which the agency or the applicant will implement as part of the proposal. The responsible official finds this information reasonably sufficient to evaluate the environmental impact of this proposal. Mitigation: The following mitigation measure shall be attached as conditions of permit issuance. These mitigation measure is consistent with policies, plans, rules, or regulations designated by KCC 20.44.080 as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority and in effect when this threshold determination is issued. Key sources of substantive authority for each mitigation measure are in parentheses; however, other sources of substantive authority may exist but are not expressly listed. I. In accordance with the requirements with RCW 58.17 .110 (2), the Applicant shall improve I 20th Avenue SE, from the plat entrance in the 19000 block northward to the intersection of SE 188th Street/I 20th Avenue SE by providing a paved walkway along the east side of 120th Avenue SE. The walkway, per Section 3.09 of the KCRS shall be selected and designed and constructed by the Applicant's engineer in accordance with any one of the following standards, and upon approval by DDES: A. A full width (8 feet) paved shoulder B. A paved shoulder ofno less than four (4) feet in width, separated by vehicle traffic by either an extruded curb or an unpaved gravel shoulder strip C. A concrete curb and gutter, and sidewalk section Comments and Appeals Written comments or any appeal of this threshold determination must be received by King County's Land Use Services Division prior to 4:30 PM April 24, 2006. Appeals must be accompanied by a nonrefundable filing fee. Please reference the file numbers when corresponding. Appeals must be in writing and state the perceived errors in the threshold determination, specific reasons why the determination should be reversed or modified, the harm the appellant will suffer if the threshold determination remains unchanged, and the desired outcome of the appeal. If the appellant is a group, the harm to any one or more members must be stated. Failure to meet these requirements may result in dismissal of the appeal. CommenUappeal deadline: Appeal filing fee: SEPA Determination.doc 7/27/99 clc 4:30 PM on April 24, 2006 $250 check or money order made out to the King County Office of Finance l ~} L04S0065 March 31, 2006 Page 3 Address for commenUappeal: Responsible Official: Lj::t!~,p,~;w, Current Planning Section Land Use Services Division Date Mailed: _March 31, 2006 __ _ SEPA Determination.doc 7/27/99 clc King County Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 ATTN: Current Planning Section Ma@b 2 ~ 1 '2J>DG Date Signed .. ~· ~ Notice of King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Wa 98055-1219 Land Use Decision AND Environmental Threshold Determination File No.: L04S0065 Applicant: Philip and Fanny Yee 11431 238 1h Street Woodway, WA 98020 Department Decision: Approve with Conditions /Tvoe 2) SEPA Threshold Determination: II/litigated Determination of Non-significance; (MDNS) Date of Decision and SEPA Determination: March 31, 2006 Project Location: 12052 SE 1901h Place Parcel Number: 6199000126 & 0127 Project Description: Short subdivision of a .96-acre site into 6 residential lots in R-6 zone together with construction of the associated road, utilities, drainage and recreation facilities. Permits Requested: Short Subdivision King County Contact: Fereshteh Dehkordi, 206-296-7173 Fereshteh.dehkordi@metrokc.gov Appeal Deadline: April 24, 2006 Comment and Appeal Procedure: Comments on this proposal are welcome. You also have the right to appeal this decision and/or determination in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner. In order to appeal, a party must file: 1. A notice of appeal and a $250.00 non-refundable filing fee (payable to the King County Office of Finance) by 4:30 p.m., April 24, 2006, and 2. A statement of appeal, by 4:30 p.m., April 24, 2006, which includes: A. The decision and/or determination being appealed; B. The errors contained in that decision and/or determination; C. Specific reasons why the decision and/or determination should be reversed or modified. D. The harm suffered or anticipated by the party; and E. The relief sought. Appeals must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) at the following address: DDES -Land Use Services Division Attn: Permit Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the Statement of Appeal. Failure to timely file a Notice of Appeal, appeal fee or Statement of Appeal, deprives the Hearing Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. The Hearing Examiner does not have the authority to extend the time period unless the Division is not open on the specified date, in which event delivery prior to 4:30 p.m. on the next business day is sufficient to meet the filing requirement. Date of Malling: March 31, 2006 If you have any questions regarding the appeal procedures, please contact the Project Manager at the phone number listed above. If you require this material in Braille, audio cassette or large print, call 206- 296-6600 (phone) or 206-296-7217 (TTY). King County has made a decision on an application for a development proposal on property at the address listed above. You are receiving notice of this decision because our records indicate that you own property within approximately 500 feet or because you requested to receive notice of the decision. Type2 NOD combined w sepa l\llAQN FILE COPY :23,.DS- (E Re~tori)" "-· FD25 (Spring Glen) FD40 Fire Protection Dist #25 Fire Protection Dist #40 P.O. Box 2925 10828 SE 176th St Renton WA 98056-0925 Renton WA 98055 MS: KSC· TR-0431 KC27 LI15 Gary Kriedt Fairwood Library KC Metro Envirn. Planning 17009 -140th Av SE Renton WA 98058 LI20 LI23 Highlands Library Kent Regional Library 2902 NE 12th St 212 --2nd Av N Renton WA 98056 Kent WA 98032-4482 Documents Dept. Librarian LI24 LI36 King County Library System Renton Library 960 Newport Way NW 100 Mill Av S Issaquah, WA 98027 Renton WA 98055 ATIN: Edward White PL18 PL19 Kent Engineering Dept Kent Planning Dept 220 -4th Av S 220 -4th Av S Kent WA 98032 Kent WA 98032 City of Renton PL33 Clinton G. Marsh, Director Fae. & Const. Dept SD9 Economic Development Dept. Kent School District # 415 1055 S. Grady Way 12033 SE 256th St. Bldg B · Renton WA 98055 Kent WA 98031-6643 R. Stracke, Facilities & Ping SD13 Administrator SES Renton School Dist # 403 Kent Sewer Utility 1220 N 4th St 220 -4th Av S Renton WA 98055 Kent WA 98032 Environmental Review Section ST17 Habitat Biologist, Rod Malcom TRl WA State Dept of Ecology Muckleshoot Indian Tribe PO Box 47703 39015 • 172nd Av SE Olympia WA 98504-7703 Auburn WA 98002 Russ Ladley, Fisheries Biologist TR2 TR3 Puyallup Tribe Snoqualmie Tribe 6824 Pioneer Wy E PO Box 280 Puyallup WA 98371 Carnation WA 98014-0280 Fisheries Habitat/Environment TR5 Richard Young TR4 Suquamish Indian Tribe Tulalip Tribe PO Box 498 7615 Totem Beach Rd Suquamish WA 98392 Marysville WA 98271 .. , -... ~ ·-·· Cedar River Water/Sewer Dist 18300 SE Lk Youngs Rd Renton WA 8058-9799 City of Renton, Public Works Dept. Development Services Div. 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Water Dist #90 15606 SE 128th St Renton WA 98059-8522 Water Dist #111 27224 -144th Av SE Kent WA 98042-9058 WA State Dept. of Wildlife Habitat Mgmt. Division P.O. Box 43155 Olympia, WA 98504-3155 WD12 WD32 WD55 WD58 Public Works Dtr Kent Water Dist 220-4th Av S Kent WA 98032 Soos Creek Water/Sewer Dist PO Box 58039 Renton WA 98058-1039 Coal Creek Utility District 6801 132nd Place SE Newcastle, WA 98059 WA State Dept. of Wildlife 16018 Mill Creek Blvd. Mill Creek, WA 98012 WD23 WD41 WDS7 .... .• i.:,- 6199000185/L04S0065 SCHOLES STEPHEN R 19113 121ST PL SE RENTON WA 98055 6199000240/L04S0065 SOOS CREEK REAL ESTATE LLC 6839 RAVENNA AV NE #201 SEATILE WA 98115 6199000161/L04S0065 VANENGELENBURG BILL+ TINA 25302 139TH PL SE KENT WA 9804 2 6199000215/L04S0065 WALTERS GARY A & TINA M 12204 SE 192ND ST RENTON WA 98058 6199000080/L04S0065 WHE~R TIM R+BRANDIE J 12131 SE 188TH ST RENT WA 98058 6198400200/L04S0065 YORK GORDON+LOIS 18827 120TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000182/L04S0065 SITTLESTEVE 12054 SE 192ND ST RENTON WA 98055 6199000210/L04S0065 TROFIMENKO ANATOLIY+RIMMA 19107 121ST PL SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000059/L04S0065 VOLCKE ERHARD H 12053 SE 188TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6199000184/L045006S WARREN SEAN S 19125 121ST PL SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000126/L04S0065 YEE PHILIP M & FANNY Y 11431 238TH AV SW WOODWAY WA 98020 6198400280/L04S0065 ZEMANEK GREG J 19003 120TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000180/L04S0065 SOLIS ISREAL O + TARA L 19133 121ST PL SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000160/L04S0065 VANENGELENBURG BILL+ TINA 25302 139TH PL SE KENT WA 98042 6199000143/L04S0065 VUONG HOA V+ TRAN TUYEN K 19036 120TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000101/L04S0065 WEHRMAN MARVIN 5115 33RD AV W EVERITT WA 98203 6199000127/L04S0065 YEE PHILIP M & FANNY Y 11431 238TH ST SW WOODWAY WA 98020 ,,,·. --·) BU LEN, BRENDA & KEN 19007 120TH A VENUE SE RENTON, WA 98058 98058 BUSH, BEN & GERALDINE 19124 121ST PLACE SE RENTON, WA 98058 98058 CLAUSSEN, KIM PROGRAM MANAGER III DDES/LUSD DEHKORDI, FERESHTEH PROJECT MANAGER II DDES/LUSD FOSTER, CURT SR. ENGINEER DDES/LUSD LABRIE, ERIC ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS 720 S 348TH STREET FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 98003 LANG ASSOCIATES DEEN LANG !0658 RIVIERA PLACE NE SEATTLE, WA 98125 YEE, FANNY & PHILIP I I 43 l-238TH STREET WOODWAY, WA 98020 L04S0065 L04S0065 L04S0065 L04S0065 L04S0065 L04S0065 L04S0065 L04S0065 ~'.: •. ,: .. . -6199000186/L04S0065 BREVIK DENNIS A & DEBORAH 19103 121ST PL SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000060/L04S0065 BUI KIM 3059 BELLEVUE WY NE BELLEVUE WA 98004 6199000200/L04S0065 BUSH BENEDICT & GERALDINE A 19124 121ST PL SE RENTON WA 98058 6198400260/L04S0065 EAGLESON RANDOLPH G PO BOX 4156 RENTON WA 98057 6199000142/L04S0065 HALKO LOUIS M 19028 120TH SE RENTON WA 98055 6199000099/L04S0065 HOLMGREN L L C 310 29TH ST NE PUYALLUP WA 98372 6199000022/L04S0065 MARTIN FRANK L 12023 SE 188TH RENTON WA 98058 6198400245/L04S0065 NICHOLSON RON JR+ANABELLA 18831120TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000026/L04S0065 PATIERSON GERALD E 18826 120TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 6198400242/L04S0065 RJDER NATHAN BRENNAN BRIDGETIE 18835 120TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000040/L04S0065 BROWN JAMES A & ETHEL 18834 120TH SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000125/L04S0065 BULEN KENNETH W JR+BRENDA 19007 120TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000183/L04S0065 BUSH BENEDICT & GERALDINE A 19124 121ST PL SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000041/L04S0065 ERVIN SHAWN L+ANNETIE M 18848 120TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 6199000205/L04S0065 HALLADIN STEPHEN K+MARGIE B 19118 121ST PL SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000140/L04S0065 HULSE JOHN H+CYNTHIA L 15404 SE 167TH PL RENTON WA 98058 6199000025/L04S0065 MARTIN FRANKL 12023 SE 188TH RENTON WA 98055 6199000120/L04S0065 OLSON BERNARD J+ TERESA L 19004 120TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 SD13/L04S0065 R. STRACKE, FACILITIES & PLANNING RENTON SCHOOL DISTRJCT #403 1220 N 4TH ST RENTON WA 98055 6199000220/L04S0065 RITZ JANIE L ESTATE OF C/0 LANWAY DONNA PR 12208 SE 192ND ST RENTON WA 98058 6198400300/L04S0065 BUI AN VAN+NGUYEN VINH CHI THI 19029 120TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000023/L04S0065 BURCHELL KEVIN JEFFREY+UNDA M 12029 SE 188TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6199000241/L04S0065 COGGERTIM 609 GRANT AV S RENTON WA 98055 6199000141/L04S0065 HALKO LOUIS M 19028 120TH SE RENTON WA 98055 6199000020/L04S0065 HAUGEN CRAIG+ANGIE 18806 120TH SE RENTON WA 98058 6198400320/L04S0065 JPS HOLDINGS LLC 18124 RJVIERA PL SW SEATILE WA 98166 6199000021/L04S0065 MARTIN FRANK L 12023 SE 188TH RENTON WA 98055 6199000100/L04S0065 PACHECO EDUARDO SANTOS 12139 SE 188TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6199000260/L04S0065 RAVENNA DEVELOPMENT C/0 CHARLES SPAETH 6839 RAVNNA AV NE SEATILE WA 98115 6199000024/L04S0065 SARRETI MARK 18820 120TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 '13m & (jm 'Busli 1912412Lst Pface SE !Jl.mtorl, 'Wftl 98058 7237 Dept of Dev & Environmental Services Land Use Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton WA 98055-1219 ~" -(;: PM -g, ~ =-- r· -i fEij / LI ,, ---- ;,, '\\-:',~ c_q,=~-1 ·-· ...... ,, .. :. ,0 ci. -,, R [}y -=_ ---f __ --·) ,, FE· --,_J\\, >'---:h., I ~jl_ 1 .--,-'-<_ -, ~ -;, i-~ "' ·-- ' ·-r ~"\ ,-Tl :.:.c. i~\; C." ·1_, -: __ .... :--, ::--.,.. r-·-._ ' -' , ~-, - [TIC) :g-o oPo rn (/) c, CJ! ,-··1 r,-, C,() :=:--., -tJ r>/ f,) 1 ! C'l i '! ,_ ·3~c_:~.f.:.+ i 2 i -~ i I, I, ,I,, I, II,,,, I ,i!ll 1in 11ll, ,I, l 11,lll, In l I I,, l, I,,, ,j,jj . --~ _.. ------· =================================== ------. ---------·-=,--=--~~-=---------_-,..... lfyou wish to receive a copy of the DDES report and decision of this application, complete and return this / portion of the notice to the Land Use Services Division at the address listed above. .._. File No. L04S0065 f~' J ( Please print ) ~ 6.> IL Narne:.~--U--'-d)'---(]./fe;--lf))--'--~~D-~~~-----------'-- Address: __ --"-O'--«t;'-'0-'2,cc:._01)-=c__~§ &=· .'---0-"'-\S-"--(}---'-'~-:·~~::__~--"'-~,:.;:;C::?~. ·---'-'~-=0 n,.c..c:.,-<>:~=-=--a"-"-----"'W'-"")'-----'-'-~ Telephone No.:Jl~ P!i?9o-C!:JCJ 0f5J @J ~ @ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakcsdak Ave SW Renton, \VA 98055-1219 L04S0065 -Yee Short Subdivision Application DDES Project Number l) -r / ,,G, r.{ C o.o.E.S. I,__.=----=£.'----C.-'-,{../J< ___ ?-_,£J_,.., _____ , hereby affirm that I have posted tneTcillowing: (print name) X Notice of Permit Application 0 Other --------------- on the 27"" day of J,4,(l(ltPj:.-Y , 2005, in accordance with the Department of Development and Enviro~ental Services' requirements. I further affirm that the notice will remain in place and visible during the full required notice period. Notice was provided at the following location(s): 1) ---r/./'li.-~UttNCTi..-:z;o 7!/G 5qt1,/r;c..7 j?i{I/LC6L o,</ 2) / ,µ, i,;. dfuE--SC · Signature This affidavit must be completed and returned to the Land Use Services Division within 7 days of posting. Improper posting or failure to return the affidavit within 7 days shall be cause for the final decision regarding your permit to be postponed. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 January 18, 2005 ' Notice Board & Posting Procedures Instruction Package Notice of Application L04S0065 In accordance with King County Code Section 20.20.060, enclosed you will find instructions, specifications, and materials in order to meet the notice of application posting requirements of the County. Please read these instructions carefully and take action quickly to order your notice board sign. Your notice board sign can be ordered through a sign painter, using the information supplied on page 2 of the enclosed "Notice Board Requirements." The cost of the sign is the responsibility of the applicant. Further processing of your application is dependent upon fulfilling the notice of application posting requirement. When your sign is in place, attach the colored laminated notice of application along with the plastic envelope ( containing extra copies of the notice of application) to the notice board as depicted on page 1 of the instructions. Maintain a supply of notices within the plastic envelope throughout the comment period. The posting sign/notice board must remain in place throughout the duration of your application. Immediately upon completion of the above instructions, complete the enclosed affidavit of posting and return to the Department of Development and Environmental Services, Land Use Division, Current Planning Section, at the address shown above (envelope enclosed). Failure to comply with posting requirements may be cause for a delay in the processing of your application. If you have any questions, please call the Land Use Services Division at (206) 296-6600. Enclosures: Notice Board Requirements-Application Laminated Notice of Application Waterproof Vinyl Envelope containing copies of the Notice of Application Affidavit of Notice of Application Posting form/LU SD return envelope Notice Board & Posting Procedures Instruction Pkg.-NOA 8/8/01 King County Department or Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 AFFIDAVIT OF -POSTING .. · •• ; . ; ,, I, .-' L04S0065 -Yee Short Subdivision Application ODES Project Number !, ______________ , hereby affirm that I have posted the following: (print name) X Notice of Permit Application D Other--------------- on the day of , 2005, in accordance with the Department of Development and Environmental Services' requirements. I further affirm that the notice will remain in place and visible during the full required notice period. ' I Notice was provided at the following location(s): \ 1) 2) _________________________ ~ 3) I hereby affinn that the above is a true and correct statement. Signature This affidavit must be completed and returned to the Land Use Services Division within 7 days of posting. Improper posting or failure to return the affidavit within 7 days shall be cause for the final decision regarding your permit to be postponed. I I NOTICE BOARD KEQUIREMENTS- 1\lOTICE OF APPLICATION King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division CJOO Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Rcn1on. Washington 9805~-l 2 I:! Per King County Code Section 20.20.060, a notice board must be prepared and posted for your land use application. Please prepare and post in the following manner: Notice Board Size and Text Specifications The notice board shall be constructed to the specifications described below. The notice board shall display the information shown in the figure. Board Construction: The notice board shall be constructed with 4' x 4' plywood. Professionally prepared plastic notice board overlays, permanently affixed to the board are permissible. Notice boards may be reused but they must be clean and show no evidence of former wording. · 1. Lettering style: Helvetica or similar standard typeface 2. Lettering size: Title should be 3" capital letters (NOTICE OF PROPOSED LAND USE ACTION). Other letters should be 2" letters except on the 8%'' x 14" laminated paper providing the details of the proposal. See illustration below for use of capital and lower case letters, and placement of laminated paper and vinyl jacket. 3. Lettering: Black (permanent ink or silk-screen) 4. Background Color: White 5. Logo: King County emblem, in black 6. Laminated Notice of Application on a legal size sheet which provides information regarding the proposed land use application. TO BE SUPPLIED BY Land Use Services Division (LUSD) (see enclosed). 7. Legal size waterproof vinyl jackets with a fold flap, and wrap string. TO BE SUPPLIED BY LUSD (see enclosed). The applicant must make copies of the Notice, place them in the vinyl jacket, and maintain a supply of copies throughout the posting period. 4 FT @ NOTICE OF PROPOSED LAND USE ACTION King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Call (206) 296-6600 Type of Action: Proposal: File No.: NOTICE OF APPLICATION 8.5" X 14" LAMINATED 4 FT EXAMPLE COPIES OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION· IN VINYL JACKET Notice Board Requirements-NOA 8/8/01 Pg 1 ' ,,, . , .'' n, ,\.,, ,;;, 1 .• ·; f ', \ .t: /,>, .'. , ,, , e , '·, , ,''. ' • ·, ,' _ .,.' ,,, Standards for Locating and Installing· Notice Boarcf'' ' ' ,(• j• ','' The notice board shall be located and installed to the specifications described below. Number of Notice Boards required for this application: ONE ( 1 ) Special Instructions: ------------------------ Notice board shall be located: Place the sign near road and facing 1201 h Ave SE • Midpoint on the site street frontage or as otherwise directed by LUSD staff to maximize visibility. • At a location 5 feet inside from the street property line; a notice board structurally attached to an existing building shall be exempt from the setback provisions, provided that no notice board is _located not more than 5 feet from the property line without approval from LUSD staff. So that the top of the notice board is between 7 to 9 feet above grade. So that it is easily accessible and totally visible to pedestrians. The applicant shall erect the notice board by solidly setting the post 12 to 18 inches into the ground; or structurally attached it to an existing building. Two 4" x 4" 8-foot-long (minimum) posts and four washers, bolts and nuts (3/8-inch diameter and bolts are 5-inches long) shall be used to install the notice board. Installation Certification The notice board(s) must be installed within 14 days after Land Use Services Division has determined that the application is. complete. The enclosed "Affidavit of Posting" must be signed, and returned to the Land Use Services Division within 7 days following the date of posting. Maintenance and Removal of the Notice Board The applicant shall maintain the notice board in good condition throughout the application review period, which shall extend through the time of the final county decision on the proposal and the expiration of any applicable appeal periods. If the notice board is removed, LUSD review of the land use application may be discontinued until the notice board is replaced and has remained in place for the required period of time. TO BE FILLED OUT BY LUSD STAFF ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTICE BOARD TEXT INFORMATION (To Be Given to the Sign Painter) Type of Action: Short Subdivision Proposal: Subdivision of a .96-acre parcel into 6 residential lots in the R-6 zone. File No.: L04S0065 NOTE: If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 206-296-6600 (voice) or for hearing impaired 206-296-7217. Notice Board Requirements-NOA 8/8/01 Pg 2 Rogers, Carol From: Sent: To: Subject: Carol: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Thursday, January 13, 2005 3:06 PM Rogers, Carol L04S0065 NOA Please mail the NOA on January 18th and have the applicant place the sign somewhere (perhaps on adjacent parcel near and road and facing !20th Avenue SE. Thanks L0450065NOA.doc (51 KB) Fereshteh 1 ST A TE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Lily Nguyen, being first duly sworn on oath that she is a Legal Advertising Representative of the King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the King County Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Public Notice was published on Monday, 1/24/05 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $128.50 at the rate of $35.00 per inch for the first publication and NIA per inch for each Lily Nguyen Legal Adverti_{ing Representative, King County Journal Subscriped and.s~om to me this 24th day of January, 2005. ,,11\\I I 111///f /// ,-,.,,,, r-.GHEfl 111111 ~ ~~............ ~ ,:2::' . ,.• (\ E)(P"e.r '•,, ~ ~ "'f"/,,,,;,,,_O '( \'1,. ~ Tom A. Meagher =: .:. ; ? <.. ~'?"> "\ 0 ::: Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Redmoiii:J;W,jj,htl(grce. ,c., i 0 ~ -.o r---,;-"'<!'- Ad Number: 858110 P.O. Number: ~ \ p\)'<> l/ -§ Cost of publishing this notice includes an affidavit surcharge. % ··.... MA-c ;;,/ c.,~ ~ 'l & l" •••••• •• • • ~ '?-,$:' 'l1,11 -1 TE or ,,,,,, 11// I/// 111 \\ \ \ \\\ KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DDES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219 NOTICE OF LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUEST, SHORT SUBDMSION Filec L04S0065 Short Plat Applicant: Fanny & Philip Yee Location: Located at 12052 SE . 190th Pl. Proposal: Subdivision of a .96 acre parcel into 6 residential lots in the R- 6 zone. Project Manager: Fereshteh Dehkordi, 206-296-7173 COMMENT PROCEDURES: DDES will issue a decision on this appli- cation following a 21-day comment period ending on February 25, ~ Written comments and addi- tional information can be obtained by contacting the project manager at the phone number listed above. Published in the King County Journal January24,2005.#658110 t 8 !;:J oc ~ j Affidavit of Publication 2951215 / 3 State of Washington, Counties of King and Snohomish, Daniel S. O'Neal being duly sworn, says that he/she is the Authorized Agent of Seattle Times Company, publisher of The Seattle Times and representing the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, separate newspapers published daily in King and Snohomish Counties, State of Washington: that they are newspapers of general circulation in said Counties and State; that they have been approved as legal newspapers by orders of the Superior Court of King and Snohomish Counties; that the annexed, being a classified advertisement, was published in: Newspaper Publication Date The Seattle Times 01/24/05 And not in a supplement thereof, and is a true copy of the notice as it was printed and/or distributed in the regular and entire issue of said paper or papers during all of said period, and that said newspaper or newspapers were regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. Subscribed and swom to before me this 2"' day of February, 2005 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at Seattle ' Rogers, Carol From: Rogers, Carol Sent: To: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 8:52 AM 'Legals' Subject: Legal ads for publ. on Monday, 1/24 Please confirm receipt. Please publish the accompanying, legal notice in your newspaper on MONDAY. January 24, 2005, which will meet our minimum legal notice requirement. Should this not be possible, please call or fax me immediately. Submit your invoice and 3 copies of the affidavit of publication to Accounts Payable, as soon after publication as possible, in order for us to enter legal proof of publication in our file records, and so that we may process same for payment. Attachment: Legal Notice KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DOES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219 NOTICE OF LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATIONS REQUEST: SHORT SUBDIVISION File: L04S0065 Applicant: Fanny & Philip Yee Location: Located at 12052 SE 190'h Pl. Proposal: Subdivision of a .96 acre parcel zoned R-6 into 6 residential lots. Project Planner: Fereshteh Dehkordi, 206-296-7173 COMMENT PROCEDURES: DOES will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day comment period ending on February 25, 2005. Written comments and additional information can be obtained by contacting the planner at the phone number listed above. REQUEST: SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ( SSDP) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) FILE NAME: FILE NO.: APPLICANT: LOCATION: Snoqualmie River Soccer Camp L04SH015 SSDP & L04CU032 CUP Peter Fewing Located at 45621 SE 150'h St. PROPOSAL: Further develop recreational activities by improving existing buildings and constructing new buildings. PROGRAM MANAGER: Mark Mitchell, 206-296-7119 COMMENT PROCEDURE: The Department of Development and Environmental Services will issue a decision on these applications following a 30-day comment period ending on February 25, 2005. Written comments and additional information can be obtained by contacting DOES at the address above or by phoning 206-296-6600. Published this 24th day of January, 2005. cc: Accounts Payable, Administrative Services Division, DOES Application File(s): L04S0065: Yee short plat application notice L04SH015 & L04CU032: Fewing shoreline & CUP application notice Seattle Times account #078871004 1 soc I ·-· .l Rogers, Carol From: Legals [legals@seattletimes.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 5:45 PM To: Rogers, Carol Subject: RE: Legal ads for publ. on Monday, 1/24 Hi Carol -your legal ad runs Mon 1/24 for $124.64 thanks . lady byrd -----Original Message----- From: Rogers, Carol [mailto:C:arol.Rogers@METROKC.GOV] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 8:52 AM To: Legals Subject: Legal ads for publ. on Monday, 1/24 P,lease_ confirlTl [ec~ip_t. Please publish the accompanying, legal notice in your newspaper on MONDAY. J_anu.a_ry_2~,_io_0_5, which will meet our minimum legal notice requirement. Should this not be possible, please call or fax me_immediately. Submit your invoice and 3 copies of the affidavit of publication to Accounts Payable, a_i;_soon after 11ublication as_ 11ossible, in order for us to enter legal proof of publication in our file records, and so that we may process same for payment. Attachment: Legal Notice KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DOES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW. Renton, WA 98055-1219 NOTICE OF LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATIONS. REQUEST: SHORT SUBDIVISION File: L04S0065 Applicant: Fanny & Philip Yee Location: Located at 12052 SE 1901h Pl. Proposal: Subdivision of a .96 acre parcel zoned R-6 into 6 residential lots. Project Planner: Fereshteh Dehkordi, 206-296-7173 COMM.ENT PROCEDURES: ODES will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day comment period ending on_February~. 2005. Written comments and additional information can be obtained by contacting the planner at the phone number listed above. REQUEST: SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ( SSDP l _CONOITIONAL USE PERMIT ( CUP l FILE NAME: Snoqualmie River Soccer Camp FILE NO.: L04SH015 SSDP & L04CU032 CUP APPLICANT: Peter Fewing LOCATION: Located at 45621 SE 1501h St. PROPOSAL: Further develop recreational activities by improving existing 01/19/2005 Page 1 of2 soc . ·-·"" Page 2 of2 buildings and constructing new buildings. PROGRAM MANAGER: Mark Mitchell, 206-296-7119 COMMENT PROCEDURE.: The Department of Development and Environmental Services will issue a decision on these applications following a 30-day comment period ending on February 25, 2005. Written comments and additional information can be obtained by contacting ODES at the address above or by phoning 206-296-6600. Published this 24th day of January, 2005. cc: Accounts Payable, Administrative Services Division, DOES Application File{s): L04S0065; Yee short plat application notice L04SH015 & L04CU032; Fewing shoreline & CUP application notice Seattle Times account #078871004 01/19/2005 i -·~ Rogers, Carol From: Sent: To: Subject: Please confirm receipt. Rogers, Carol Tuesday, January 18, 2005 9:00 AM 'legals.bellevue@kingcountyjournal.com' Legal ad for publ. on Monday, 1 /24 KC Journal Please publish the accompanying, legal notice in your newspaper on MONDAY. January 24, 2005, which will meet our minimum legal notice requirement. Should this not be possible, please call or fax me immediately. Submit your invoice and 3 copies of the affidavit of publication to Accounts Payable, as soon after publication as possible, in order for us to enter legal proof of publication in our file records, and so that we may process same for payment. Attachment: Legal Notice KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DOES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219 NOTICE OF LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUEST: SHORT SUBDIVISION File: L04S0065 Short Plat Applicant: Fanny & Philip Yee Location: Located at 12052 SE 1901h Pl. Proposal: Subdivision of a .96 acre parcel into 6 residential lots in the R-6 zone. Project Manager: Fereshteh Oehkordi, 206-296-7173 COMMENT PROCEDURES: DDES will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day comment period ending on February 25. 2005. Written comments and additional information can be obtained by contacting the project manager at the phone number listed above. Published this 24'h day of January, 2005. cc: Accounts Payable, Administrative Services Division, DOES Application File(s): L04S0065: Yee short plat application notice E.ile f:.dit ~iew !.nsert Fgrmat Iools {!ctions t:!elp ,,., &eply ~ Reply to A[I ~" For~ard & v G>J X ,o. • -o-• if,, 12) • From: Tom Meagher [tom.meagher@kingcountyjournal.com) To: Rogers, Carol Cc: Subiect: RE: Legal ad for publ. on Monday, 1/24 KC Journal Hi, Caroll >!'-.· .. :,:1 ... ~ .. f1';251Yj· _,_,·-"."~~.n 1-,.;,t· .:1 question f.::-.1 · ~· Sent: Tue 01/18/2005 9: 15 AM I have received your email, and will publish the notice (Re/File LD4S0065) in the 1/24/05 edition of the King County Journal. Thanks very much, Carol.. have a really great day! Tom Meagher Legal Advertising Representative King County Journal Newspapers Phone: 425-453-4296 Fax: 425-635-0602 -----Original Message----- From: Rogers, Carol [mailto:Carol.Rogers@METROKC.GOV] Sent: Tuesday, J armary 18, 2005 9:00 AM To: 'legals. bellevue@kingc ountyjoumal. com' Subject: Le gal ad for pub!. on Monday, I f24 KC J oumal ". P/e.'?se confirm receipt. 1Y·! :IB~~--.,-~-~~@-}1 ~~~~--~1~~oo:;;~ ·rli!l~-c -~~_;;@'~*©~ re~aoo .,_... ·-. --~.,.----. ,~---···-··~~--~, -:.-· - Tuesday, Jan 18, 2005 09:16 AM User: p1ancrog Computer: DE217953 Os: Windows NT Version: 5.1 ~. J.· @ ,; Department nf D~vdor,rn~nt and Environrnenial Service.~ Land u.~e Scnicc.'i Division 900 Oakt:sdale Avenue Southwest Renton. Washington 98055-! 219 Applicant: Fanny & Philip Yee I I 431 238 111 Street Woodway, WA 98020 425-398-4406 Consultant: Lang Associates, Inc. 10658 Riviera Place NE Seattle, WA 98125 (206) 306-8880 Project Location: 12052 SE 190th Place ~~~~~® ©~ A~~~ ~~©J~~©[n) (Type 2) File No : L04S0065 ODES Project Manager: Fereshteh Dehkordi Telephone No. 206-296-7173 Fereshteh .dehkord i@metrokc.gov Date Application Filed: December 27, 2004 Date Determined Complete: January 17, 2005 Project Description: Subdivision of a .96 acre-parcel into 6 residential lots in R-6 zone Permits requested in this application: Short Subdivision Relevant envirorunental documents are available at the above address: D Yes [fil Not Applicable Development regulations to be used for project mitigation, known at this time: KCC 21A. (Zoning), KCC 19A (Subdivision), KCRS (Title 14), KCSWDM (Title 9. Consistency with applicable County plans and regulations: This proposal will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable King County codes including Roads Standards, Surface Water Design Manual, and Sensitive Areas Codes. Other permits not included in this application, known at this time: NA The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day public comment period which ends on February 25, 2005. Written comments on this application must be submitted to DOES at the address below. A public hearing is not required for this application prior to the DOES decision. However, the ODES decision may be appealed to the King County Hearing Examiner. who would conduct an appeal hearing prior to making a decision on the appeal. Details of the appeal process will be included in the notice of decision. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact the Project Manager at the phone number listed above. You may review the application and any environmental documents or studies in our Renton office. NOTE: If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 206-296-6600 ( voice) or 206-296-7217 (TTY). Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Date of Mailing: Februarv I, 2005 =================================================== If you wish to receive a copy of the DOES report and decision of this application, complete and return this po11ion of the notice to the Land Use Services Division at the address listed above. File No. L04S0065 ( Please print) Name:.~---------------------------------~ Address: ________________________________ _ Telephone No.: _____ _ - ,:;. ~ 0 0 in ·cp ~ !") ~@ (""I wiu • .~ c::::::> '-lo ~ \@i\ cg I ~ ~ s C'9 ..- i POlla! POLE 05.27 RECORDING NO. VOL/PAGE PROPOSED LOTS .. • 100 SCALE: 1" = 50' ~-., I =• II) PORTION OF SE 1/4 of SW 1/4, S. 33 T. 23 N., R. 5 E., W.M. S.E. CUR\£ 188th ST. C1 -C2 C3 C4 = r Q§ C6 f:7 DELTA ANGLE Br.f. 1 26"37'.J.4. J6'555.J 56'0<f.10 .... _ ... 281.f.F2 mJ'24' zo·31•44 RADIUS 25.00 45.00' "5.00 45.00' ·---"5.00 ~ "5.00 ARC LENGTH 35.69 20.91 29.01 ... ,,. --·-2218 :J9. :..I ~ qi EXISmNG TREES TO BE REMOVED AND REPI.ACED 6199000041 RS-6-50 ~I ~ II 6199000120 RS-6-50 VOL --~00-.-- TRACT 6 . GARDEN TRACTS DIV. 47, PAGE 90 J 30' EASEMENT FUR --INGRESS, EGRESS, --- N 89'54'2~ 629.92' 12'0~A • 5 STANO--..__· a, =25 PIPE\._ ; 7~ i\~ll • /11 ' I ,~ ~· DRA1NAG£ AND UTIUTIES REC. NO. 7810060608 i/ ~ I -Js=¢:f-.,, \ -I :::::::::3 ,, ;',, \"'ILOTl,. N ~ Clll l~ ' ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~o · _,,::--:$1/ I , ) o ~,-i • i " ~~ .\630.15' J, ) \ ~ wJI/ lln I · "' ii o"6 .,. I L //// I I ,, /. • z 1 I s199000142 I RS-6-50 6199000140 I LEGEND I RS-6-50 't>. PO'll£R POLE 0 BOLLARD I 42.01 619!KXIIJ50 RS-6-50 ,, , 1 ,,,-1 M wAJER vALVf. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ~ li\!IOJRiJ"'IHI 6199000059 I RS-6-50 I I t, I 136.41 287.13 6199000210 RS-6-50 ~ ' . i .0 FIRE HYDRANT TRACT 6, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS, DIVISION NO. 5, -----------------------. ---~----. ..... ~-• 11..11:' ~ ~ House «I/ (( (////(/ FOUND REBAR AND CAP ·51991 RS-8-50 LS 18898 0.36' N. OF LINE ,s;r;. D4 w::.r...-r~we11m1• Anoa .,--,. ~ -175 Sq. FL 'A· 2o·~®J~~ '° <O "' ........... 0 CD ,... :.,. ... 0 z 6199000220 RS-6-50 ,FOUND 2"' IRON PIPE JO' WAlER MAIN EASEMENT REC. NO. 7810020168 0 Depanmem of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900. Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Re~ton, Washington 98055·12 l 9 Applicant: Fanny & Philip Yee 11431 238 1h Street Woodway, WA 98020 425-398-4406 Consultant: Lang Associates, Inc. 10658 Riviera Place NE Seattle, WA 98125 (206) 306-8880 Project Location: 12052 SE 190th Place Nt,tice of Application (Type 2) File No : L04S0065 DDES Project Manager: Fereshteh Dehkordi Telephone No. 206-296-7173 Fereshteh.dehkordi@metrokc.gov Date Application Filed: December 27, 2004 Date Determined Complete:.JanU:aryl7, 2005 ,-:,;:,, Project Description: Subdivision ·of a .96 acre-parcel into 6 r~sidenti;)Iots in·R~6 :ioriJ1 !,··,.,,.,,.,,,,,,.,., ,,,, Permits requested in this application: Short Subdivision Relevant environmental documents are available at the. above address: · D Yes l:RlN ot Applicable . Development regulations to be used for project mitigation, known at this time: KCC 21A. (Zoning), KCC 19A (Subdivision), KCRS (Title 14), KCSWDM (Title 9.' Consistency with applicable County plans and regulations: This proposal will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable King County codes inducting RoadsStan~ards, Surface Water Design Ma,nual, an,d'Sensitive A,:reils.'Cod~s,: · Other permits not included in this application; known at this time: NA The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day public comment period which ends on February 25, 2005. Written comments on this application must be submitted to DOES at the address below. A public hearing is not required for this application prior to the ODES decision. However, the DOES decision may be appealed to the King County Hearing Examiner, who would conduct an appeal hearing prior to making a decision on the appeal. Details of the appeal process will be included in the notice of decision. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact the Project Manager at the phone number listed above. You may review the application and any environmental documents or studies in our Renton office. NOTE: If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 206-296-6600 (voice) or 206-296-7217 (TTY). Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Date of Mailing: February 1, 2005 ========================================~========.= If you wish to receive a copy of the DDES report and decision of this application, complete and return this portion of the notice to the Land Use Services Division at the address listed above. File No. L04S0065 ( Please print ) . Name:·----------------------------------'-- Address:. ___________________________ ~------ Telephone No.: ------ PROPOSED LOTS RECORDING NO. SCALE: 1" = 50' PORTION OF VOL/PAGE .. 0 J¥1 grs ,_, St ,., ,_, . I ~ SE 1/4 of SW 1/4, S. 33 T. 23 N., R. 5 E., W.M. 1 S.E. 188th a.JR\£ DELTA ANGIE RAOIIJS ARC LENGTH ~ CASED MOH., NO M-E ~ OfFSETS FOR WOH. ~ :> . ~ ~ __ ,.. °n @ "' ·o -'c-> __ ~ 'i;' ·9 .··t. ~ ~, I i \ ~ ~ - 6199000041 RS-6-50 Cl 8J",f.I fL ST. C2 26"37'34· -C.J 36'55 c• 56t).f.'10· cs 2tn•2r C8 .fJ'2J '24 C7 10"31'#- N 59•54'2~ 629_92, . @ ii 9 I --TRACT ~.oo-· - :1l 12'~1A DIV. 5 6199000125 ~D~ RS+so -I ;! R:H-50 ~ I Ir.: 6199000120 11 1 \qi.)~ VOL 47, PAGE 90 l&J l 30' EASEMENT FOR (I) --1NGR6S, EGRESS, - ~ ~ "' z I, i· 1 REC. NO. 7810060608 (JI I ORAIIW)E AND UTILITIES T --==·r::::::;!--~ G -8 (rj J I 0 C'4 -~~f~~ot: . I G ~I l \)34.3.01 • I "' " . 1 · a;.59'20• w \ 630. 15' '0 I "' Yok////?J l POm Pa.[ 05.27 0) I 7/////7////-'j I J /fl .. I ~I % : ~L i! I 6199000142 ,: R:H-50 I 6199001140 I LEGEND. "' RS-6-50 'a. PO\\£R POI£ .; _,!> 0 BOl!ARD - \ I I I l><I WAlER VAi.VE \ f r, FIRE H'fDRANT \1 ~ I I I 2S.00 Js.69 4li 2(191· <liOO 29.0! <liOO' ..... <liOO ~ 4li <Ii EXISIT1NG 1REES 10 BE REMOVED AND REPLACED 6199000050 RS-6-50 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2.7' li\!)16l} !gljjl}={] " ~ I ~ I 6199000059 I RS-6-50 , I t1 I [/;:;;j 61 RS-6-50 ~ ~~--175 Sq. FL " 20· ... ,i;i lDT 6 ® 94.~ z R£CRfA!UI SPACE 136.41 6199000220 RS-6--50 6199000210 RS-6-50 ~ , FOUND 2" IRON PIPE Jd YIAlER MAIN EASEMENT REC. NO. 7810020168 TRACT_~' __ NQ!llliWESTERN GARDEN TR~CTS,_ DIVISION NO. 5, • • CLAUSSEN, KIM PROGRAM MANAGER III DDES/LUSD DEHKORDL FERESHTEH PROJECT MANAGER II DDES/LUSD FOSTER, CURT SR. ENGINEER DDES/LUSD LAl31(11,, l,RIC ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS 720 S 348TH STREET FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 LANG ASSOCIATES DE EN LANG I 0658 RIVIERA PLACE NE SEATJ'LE. WA 98125 YEE, FANNY & PHILIP I 1431-238TH STREET WOODWAY, WA98020 L04S0065 L04S0065 L04S0065 L04S0065 L04S0065 L04S0065 0 -.._ .,.. • 6199000260/L04S0065 B & J IPL LC 13425 E KATHLEEN DR SE RENTON WA 98059 6198400300/L04S0065 BUI AN VAN+NGUYEN VJNH CHI THI 19029 120TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000200/L04S0065 BUSH BENEDICT & GERALDINE A 19124 121ST PL SE RENTON WA 98058 6198400260/L04S0065 EAGLESON RANDOLPH G 18851 120TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000142/L04S0065 HALKO LOUIS M 19028 120TH SE RENTON WA 98055 6199000099/L04S0065 HOLMGREN JAY H 12205 SE 188TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6199000022/L04S0065 MARTIN FRANKL 12023 SE 188TH RENTON WA 98058 6198400245/L04S0065 NICHOLSON RON JR+ANABELLA 18831120TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000026/L04S0065 PATTERSON GERALD E 18826 120TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 6199000143/L04S0065 RITTER LAMONT D 19036 120TH AV SE RENTON ·wA 98058 6199000186/L04S0065 BREVIK DENNIS A & DEBORAH 19103 121ST PL SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000060/L04S0065 BUI KIM 10909 SE 222ND ST KENT WA 98031 6199000183/L04S0065 BUSH BENEDICT & GERALDINE A 19124 121ST PL SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000041/L04S006S ERVIN SHAWN L+ANNETTE M 18848 120TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 6199000205/L04S0065 . HALLADIN STEPHEN K+MARGIE B 19118 121ST PL SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000140/L04S0065 HULSE JOHN H+CYNTHIA L 15404 SE 167TH PL RENTON WA 98058 6199000025/L04S0065 MARTIN FRANK L 12023 SE 188TH RENTON WA 98055 6199000120/L04S0065 OLSON BERNARD J+ TERESA L 19004 120TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 SD13/L04S0065 R. STRACKE, FACILITIES & PLANNING RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT #403 1220 N 4TH ST RENTON WA 98055 6199000220/L04S0065 RITT JANIE L 26422 22ND CT SE MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 6199000040/L04S0065 BROWN JAMES A & ETHEL 18834 120TH SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000023/L04S0065 BURCHELL KEVIN JEFFREY+UNDA M 12029 SE 188TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6199000241/L04S0065 COGGER TIM 609 GRANT AV S RENTON WA 98055 6199000141/L04S0065 HALKO LOUIS M 19028 120TH SE RENTON WA 98055 6199000020/L04S0065 HAUGEN CRAIG+ANGIE 18806 120TH SE RENTON WA 98058 6198400320/L04S006S KOKESH ROBERT J+ARLENE J 7695 SW WESTMOOR WY PORTLAND OR 97225 6199000021/L04S0065 MARTIN FRANK L 12023 SE 188TH RENTON WA 98055 6199000100/L04S0065 PACHECO EDUARDO SANTOS 12139 SE 188TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6198400242/L04S0065 RIDER NATHAN BRENNAN BRIDGETTE 18835 120TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000125/L04S0065 SALGUERO BRENDA 19007 120TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 -··-... -. 6199000024/L04S0065 SARRITTMARK 18820 120TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000180/L04S0065 SOLIS ISREAL O + TARA L 19133 121ST PL SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000160/L04S0065 VANENGELENBURG BILL+ TINA 25302 139TH PL SE KENT WA 98042 6199000215/L04S0065 WALTERS GARY A & TINA M 12204 SE 192ND ST RENTON WA 98058 6199000080/L04S0065 WHEELER TIM R+BRANDIE J 12637 NE 68TH PL KIRKLAND WA 98033 6198400200/L04S0065 YORK GORDON+LOIS 18827 120TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 • 6199000185/L04S0065 SCHOLES STEPHEN R 19113 121ST PL SE RENTON WA 98055 6199000240/L04S0065 THOMPSON JAMES LEEROY+JUDIT 12218 SE 192ND RENTON WA 98058 6199000161/L04S0065 VANENGELENBURG BILL+ TINA 25302 139TH PL SE KENT WA 9804 2 6199000184/L04S0065 WARREN SEAN S 19125 121ST PL SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000126/L04S0065 YEE PHILIP M & FANNY Y 11431 238TH AV SW WOODWAY WA 98020 6198400280/L04S0065 ZEMANEK GREG J 19003 120TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000182/L04S0065 SITTLESTEVE 12054 SE 192ND ST RENTON WA 98055 6199000210/L04S0065 TROFIMENKO ANATOLIY+RIMMA 19107 121ST PL SE RENTON WA 98058 6199000059/L04S0065 VOLCKE ERHARD H 12053 SE 188TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6199000101/L04S0065 WEHRMAN MARVIN 5115 33RD AV W EVERITT WA 98203 6199000127/L04S0065 YEE PHILIP M & FANNY Y 11431 238TH ST SW WOODWAY WA 98020 ,\ ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 Web date: 09/09/2005 CERTIFICATION & TRANSFER OF APPLICANT STATUS For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Permit Number: L04S0065 -------------- FOR CURRENT OWNER: I, Fanny Y. Yee , (print name) hereby certify that I am an/the owner of the property which is the subject of this application for permit or approval. If I am not the sole owner of the property, I certify that I am authorized by any and all other owners of the property to make this certification and transfer any an all rights I/we have to apply for this permit or approval to the person listed below. I, therefore certify t at Ton Ford (print name) is the "applicant" for this ermit or approval and shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless "applicant" talus is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. By being the "applicant," that individual as umes financial responsibility for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. I certify under pe alty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. 4/28/2006 Date Signed FOR INDIVIDUALS: I, Ton Ford , (print name) hereby certify that I am the "applicant" for this permit or approval. I shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless "applicant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. I accept financial responsibility for all fees associated with this permit or approval and will receive any refunds. My mailing address is: . Anthony Ford ~ 2648 15th Ave West Seattle, WA 98116 I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. y J <7"'-b ./ 'i?'-1 (, --o(.., Signature of Applicant Date Signed OR FOR CORPORATIONS/BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS: I, , (print name) hereby certify that I am an authorized agent of , a corporation or other business association authorized in the State of Washington and that this business association is the "applicant" for this permit or approval and is financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. This association shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless "applicant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. The mailing address of this business association is: I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature of Applicant Date Signed CertAndTransferApplicantStatusFORM.doc lc-cer-trapstat.pdf 09/09/2005 I\IIAII\I FILE COPY Page 1 of 2 I NOTICE TO APPLICANTS: By law, this department returns all engineering arid other plans to the applicant. If, however, you wish to authorize the department to return engineering and other\plans directly to the engineer, architect, or other consultant for the limited purpose of making corrections, please designate below: ~ I _,,,h-,;~-,h;" -'---~---"-,_,,, __ -•----''·--"·· •--.. ----.. ••--"·' , __ .J 1 u ... u 1u1 ,.._'-' ll 11,,;;,, U'i.it,,'C;u U 11,;;;il ll lV I VlUI 11 t,JICU l;::I UII C\.,llY lU 11 IY \,,,VI l.:>Ulldl lL\.:>J IUI ll t 3f limited purpose of making corrections, as designated on this form. · . . >NSULTANTS: ana Associates, Inc. 10658 Riviera PL NE, Seattle, WA 98125-6938 North Casacdes Enaineerina PLLC, PO Box 309, Winthroo, WA 98862 Check out the DOES Web site at www.metrokc.qo• Vddes CertAndTransferApplicantStatusFORM.doc lc-cer·trapstat.pdf 09/09/2005 Page 2 of2 Web date: 09/13/2005 ,® King County DROP-OFF COVERSHEET FOR LUSD ONLY Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 . TIY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Drop-Off Cover Sheet for Land Use Services Division 00000000000000000 IMPORTANTooeoooooooooooooo PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME IS NECESSARY FOR ALL DROP-OFFS Project No L04S0065 ~~~~-------------- Project Name "Yee Short Plat" now known as "Emerald Estates" FROM LANG ASSOCIATES, INC. Attn: De-En Lang Company Name/ Contad Person Telephone No 206 306-8880 TO Fereshteh Dehkordi DATE RECEIVED BY LUSD ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY KING COUNTY STAFF (please print) Short Plat/ Plats Please specify ttem(s) dropped-off: Certification & Transfer of Applicant Status Please notify Finance office this change so all future invoice will go to the new applicant Lot Line Adjustment Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Right of Way Permit Please specify ttem(s) dropped-off: Clearing/ Grading Pennit-Additional information requested. Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Other: PLEASE NOTE: All drop-off item(s) will be logged into the computer under the project number, therefore, it is important that the top portion of this form is completed property before you drop-off anything. Assistance in finding a project number can be provided by speaking to a Zoning/Land Use Technician. Your cooperation is important. Thank you. Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Drop-OffCoverSheet-LUSDOnlyFORM lg-cvs-dropofl.pdf 09/13/2005 Page 1 of 1 - ::: '.' v \crr1r-~1F JRJEN1rO>N f.D ., · Kathy Keolker, Mayor l'lanning/Buildirtg/PublicWorks Department ~. I e Gregg Zimmerman. P.E., Admi.nistrator ' Aprjl 13, 7006 ) Ms. Fereshteh Dehkordi King County Department of Development & E~vironmental Services Land.Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, W.A 9.8055-1219 . SUBJECT: NOTICE OF SEPA-MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE YEE SHORT PLAT L04S0065 Dear Ms. Dehko.rdi: . . Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project proposal. Renton's Planning/Building/Public Works Department comments are as follows: . l. ·The proposed development is within the City of Renton's potential annexation area. Therefore, we req~est that street improvements (roadway widening and pavement thickness, curb, gutter, sidewalks, street lighting, etc.) to 120th Avenue Southeast abutting the development site, and the new streets within the site be installed per City ·of Renton standards .. . Sincerely, { .·EztttJIJ//1/?f#/~ Administ!"at0·r · Planhing/Building/P\1blic Works Dept. cc: AleX PietSch. 'EDNSP Administrator Lys Hornsby. Utilit}; Systems Director Peter Hahn, Deputy Administrator-Transportation Lesley Betlach, Parks Director · Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshall Jennifer Hen"ning, Principal Planner Bob Mahn, Civil Engineering .. MAIN !FILE co~v H:\File Sys\ADM -PBPW Adminstrntion\Admin Sec !l\2006\SE.PA\041306 SEPA Ye: Short Plal L04.S0065.d~ 1055 South.Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 · ~ E N T O N . . . .@ This paper coni.alns 50°/~ ~cycled inaterial, 30% post consumer_ AHEAD OF THE CURVE -_ j!J@ <CII1rY (())JF mEN1r<ON. · ~1~ ·. · Planning/Building/Public. Works 1055 South Grady Way ~ Renton Wash\ngton 98055. ·:.:,u,. ... "' ·1-¢ . a: .... ·c.., ... ... IU U> :: !' · I\Js. Fereshteh Dehkor,i°i · .~, r~+i ~,-. , .. 'it. : \ l,P. Q #Pft. 14'06 . . . : g J] l o ·'·'c- ~ . II . ) ijlf•a · . g . io~99,1 u.a. IIOSTAOC g -· ;'"' ;;,: -~/~ ··~- c_-.. ·,:-; ~-; :!; ··~ if; a . ;;,;, -'Fn 2:...,, -0 -10 --..J ·,-7 J>n, .. . .--<:: "l> . -:-: · King County Department of Development & Environmental Services · r. 0 :.!J :it' ......... rn .· ITJ · ';tJ •.'J . "' . < ~ .. o_ .~Ds,) . .r::;'- Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest . Renton, WA 98055-1219 /-::-~ ~ .·J) 5-:-IOSMP 98055 II ,I ,!I "I ,II" .. 1,1, ,I ,J ,;.,(I .,J ,I; .. 11.,i ,Ill;, ,JI., ,I ,,,II . @ Thispaper~SO%recydedpaper,30%post~. ' ., ® King County lrtrtlf~~:pz.,,~~:~~h-··i Department of De'Velop~e.nt and SnvJronmen~ Sevices Land U!le Services Dlvistoo 000 O,,kesdale Av,,r.ue So"mwest ~enton, Vliuttington 9$055-1219 ::jl: (( »y4t"§[J) (0 {5 5_ si,,,.. Alternative formats availlble upon request Zip P ne I ·-Fannv&PhilipYee 11431-23~1h~t ______ vyoodwav. WA 98020 42~398-4406 ; 1 , ~:~~N;::ociates. lnc.St/;;658 Riviera __ PI NE ............... s:ttle ..... WA .. 9~~25 . 2:i;00-8880 AdtUeat.'l.octi!H))\ of Pfupefry Size,.~, Pmpt-rty ~·o. ot Lo1s i 12052 SE 19Qlh Pl . 0.96 acres (41,935 sa-ft) / s r ~E: ~4vJ s;; Ii;; jR 5El T , NW~::::~~cts, Dh/5, Vol 47 of! T~:~~~~~2610127 .... _ ................. , .......... -... -.. •----' lats, Page 90, KC Record Except W 343' · .... _.,_ .... ., .... -.............. .L ...... -----t me is lrue and con~ctto the best of m1knowter.J\le. Signature Dai1r ····························-T echniclan; Kto!i: -············································ Zur.ing: Min. Lot Atea ·······-·····-Re~"rict.:0:if.: ------ Min. Lot V'.fdth ................................... -.... --------- Cc:1u11tmitv ?ia!'lniog Atea. -----··---··························- CcfflJitetwnsiYe Pla1l Oe1ignatir;n: ··········-····--··----___ ...... _ .. ___ -..... . SensUN'e Atnas ~p No •. ···-··--······-··························-······ .. ······-Landslide Floodplain fali l!u~J>g W.lland --Erosion .......... --CQal f.lJne Sebmoc ==::: Sloop Slope -·-······-··--·-·-··----·-······-·····---- Known Urunapped SenSi!ivn A!eaa: -------- Crilie3l t"h'ait!age 6asm: -····-·······-·-·--------·---·-·······- SWM Varia!\08 Reque'lR.$1? ·-·-·-······················· .. ·······-·· .. ·-··-·- C!P Projet,·r? ··········-············-···-·-···························--···-·········-- ····················-·-········-----······-····················-····-····--.... - C:? P1i)jdct? ·········-··-···-·····-······-···----·-······················-······- Seb:')iti-/o AM,, VaJ"i3.nco R~ed"! ............ -·····-·--·- Certif,cate ofW-.Mer AY.lt~bU:tf R&Q,#etrl Certif!C8i!3 of sewer Availabfllly Req1Jired1 ............ _____ ........... i l-iealll: Department AppfoVa.! Re,q~red? .................... ·-----··--- SEPA Requnod7 ••• -..... -... -.................... -.. (SA, 2!"10,P.8.) Pfoof of l.egol L.ct Re<jlJ~eo? Qlt,e,: i I i i FEES State Higt1way? Yn Ho .......... / •. .:_-""'" ------)-------- / Said Eagle Na>t Buffer? S.1id Eng:10 Hab:ilai Area? ......................... 1 ..................... -.. --.. -.. . Yos J No_ Yeo ....... J. tlo Yes No -=-=-------·-·-......................................... . F!!rest Dis,!. AG Ois1 RELATED FILES: ••. Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/dde! p-~ 1 o!2 (f) • ® King County Department of Development and Environmental _Services Laud Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 ,. - Application Number(s) _________ --i~-fi::/iS~:fE' n 1111 r.=t r:::-. Date Filed: _______________ In}_ DEC;; 2;0411; lUI I (We) request the following permit(s)or approval(s): D Building Permit D Clearing & Grading Permit 8 Temporary Use Permit Binding Site Plan D Site Development Permit D Boundary Line Adjustment "JSt Short Subdivision t1 Formal Subdivision D Urtian Planned Development D Plat Alteration D Plat Vacation D Road Variance . D Drainage Variance D Right-of-Way Use Permit D Shoreline Exemption I, EaooyYee (pdntname) D D D D D D D D D D D D D D Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Shoreline Conditional Use Permit Shoreline Variance Shoreline Redesignation Zoning Variance Conditional Use Permit Reuse Of Public Schools Special Use Permit Zone Reclassification Site Specific Comprehensive Plan Amendment P-Suffix Amendment Reasonable Use Exception Public Agency & Utility Exception Periodic Review for Mining Sites being duly sworn, state that I am the owner or officer of the corporation owning property described in the legal description filed with this application and that I have reviewed the rules and regulations of the Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) regarding the preparation and filing of this application and that all statements, answers and information submitted with is application are in all respects true, accurate and complete to, the best of my knowledge and belief. During the review of this application, it may be necessary for DD S staff to make one or more site visits., By signing this application form, you are giving permission for th e visits. If it is rental' 'property, the owner hereby agrees to notify tenants of possible site visits. EaaayY Yee printed name 11431-2JBtb St mailing address Woodway city WA 98020 State zip corporation or company name 425 398-4406 telephone If applicable, state below, the name, address and telephone number of the authorized agent forthis application as shown on the Certification and Transfer of Application Status form filed with this application. name mailing address telephone city state zip I ,. PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT: OWNER: PROJECT PLANNER MANAGER: LAND SURVEYOR: FIELD TOPOGRAPHY: ENGINEER: EXISTING ZONING: ACREAGE: DENSITY CALCULATION: No. OF LOTS PROPOSED: PROPOSED USE: WATER: SEWAGE DISPOSAL: FIRE: SCHOOL: POWER: TELEPHONE: · Yee Short Plat Fanny Y. & Philip M. Yee 11431-238th St. Woorf.Nay, WA 98020 425 398-4406 LANG ASSOCIATES, INC. 10658 Riviera Place N.E. Seattle, WA 98125 Attn: De-En Lang (206) 306-8880 Sadler and Barnard, Inc. 12714 Valley Ave E, Suite B Sumner, WA 98390-1522 Attn: Mike Luna 253 826-8135 TLP Pacific, LLC 17624 NE 301h Place Redmond, WA 98052 Attn: Todd A. Popelka 206 396-8449 R--6 0.96 (41,935 sq-ft) See attached density calculation 6 (/Acre) Detached Single Family Soos Creek Water & Sewer District Soos Creek Water & Sewer District King County Fire District 40 Renton School District Puget Sound Energy Qwest ., ~[E~[E~Wf[g[OJ· DEC 2 7 2004 K.it.3~~t~ (CQ!f''\1 soc DDES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 December 27, 2004 1- Summarv of Charees at Aoolication Applicant: Description YEE, FANNY & PHILIP l 1431-238TH STREET WOODWAY, WA 98020 425-398-4406 Bldg FireFlow Review Counter Service Fees Critical Areas Non-Resi Deposit Based on Est Hrs Totals By Category: Total Fees: Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: Due At Application $138.86 $283.76 $724.50 $12,171.60 $13,318.72 Page I of I L04S0065 PRE-SP APPLIED Due At Settlement $0.00 $13,318.72 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the Information provided to DOES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the a licant. All fees must be paid in full before DOES issues Final A roval, T.C.0. or C.O. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 .. Application Aclknowfledgemenfc 12-27-2004 This letter is to acknowledge that an application has been received for the following work: Application Number: L04S0065 Application Date: 12/27/2004 Applicant: YEE, FANNY & PHILIP Location: Site Address: Parcel: 619900-0126 Permit Type: PRE-SP Subtype: PRE-SP Title: YEE SHORT PLAT 6-LOT Description: PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT FOR 6-LOTS Questions about this application and it's status should be directed to the permit service center at: 206-296-6600. LU_APP _ACK 05-16-03 King County Deparbnent of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton. WA 98055-1219 Aoolication No. CERTl~~ATION ~ fE (G IE ~ WI fff! . ' APPLICANT STATUS DEC 2 7 2004 [DJ I, Fanny Y & Pbilip NI Yee, hereby certify that I am an/the owner of the property ~"1chlis ,ttie:.s. subject of this application for permit or approval. If I am not the sole owner of the property, I certify that I am authorized to apply for this permit or approval by any and all other owners of the property. My mailing address is: 11431-23Btb St Waactway WA sao20 I further certify that I am the "applicant" for this permit or approval and am financial responsible for all non-hourly fees and hourly charges. I shall remain the 'applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless I transfer my "applicant" status in writing on a form provided by this department. By being the 'applicant" that individual assumes financially responsibility foe all fees and will receive any refunds paid. -OR- I, , hereby certify that I am an authorized agent of __ , a corporation or other business association authorized to do business in the State of Washington which is the subject of this application for permit approval. If this business association is not the sole owner of the property, I certify that this business association is authorized to apply for the permit or approval by any and all other owners of the property. The mailing address of this business association is: I further certify that the above named business association is the "applicant" for this permit or approval and is financially responsibility tac all fees and will receive any refunds paid. This association sh II remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless it transfer its "applicant" status in writing on a form provided by this department. penalty of perjury under the law of the State of Washington that foregoing is true (~41°~ Date Signed NOTICE to APPLICANTS: By law, this department returns all engineering and other plans to the applicant, if, however, you wish to authorize the department to return engineering and other plans directly to e engineering, architect, or other consultant for the limited pi,rpose of making · , please designate below. rize this department to return plan directly to Lang Associates INC for the limited ose of m · corrections. ;<'::.:._. ~~~~~~--=--J_'!:/._J~e,;(t~e7:_9 __ _ , From: Peter Hayet To: D•En Lang Date: 12/23/2004 Time: 5:28:04 PM ' ••••••••*******~***•*******+~••~**********•w********~**~******• * * • • • Parce:#:519900 0126 HE'I'!il.OSC/IN .PROPERTY PROFILE KING COUNTY 'EXPANDED LEGAL rm:Sc:ll.IFTION Site ACdress:*no Site Address• LOT 6 NORTHWESTERK GARDEN TRS DIV #5 E 143 FT OF W 486 FT OF T"-1\CT 6 AKA LO~ B OF R~VISEC K C SHORT SUED NO 0725 7 K.C, o.o.E.S. Page 3of6 • • • From: P7ter Hayes io: Oe-En La:'\; Date: 12123/200,4 Time: 5:26:04 PM * * * HETROSCAN PROPERTY PROFILE :KING COUNTY '/lXPANDED LEGAL 'D1&SC1I.I1?TION LOT 6 NORTH\IESTERK GARDEN TRS DIV #5 TAP.CT 6 ::,Ess W 48 6 FT AKA LOT C CF REV:SED K C SHORT SUED NO C7257 f)age 5 of e * + • ~~THl~ND L.:_J TITlf INSURANCE COMPAN, PHILADELPHIA ................ _,. ~~ rr.uu.uc.u -'.l " '-Ul;ki't;SY fOR THE SOLE Pl.'RPOSE OF ASSlSTrnc UI LOCA.TtNC Tf'F· -r:BJECT PROPERTY AtiD KO LtABlltTY ts ASSL~EO FOR t~r.c1:RAC ::r:HCN THE SKETCH. REFER~CE 7200LIVEWAY SUITE 1000. SEAmE. WA5HINGTON98101 SHOULD BE ~.ADE TO A Sf!RVEY F'OR F":RTHf.R I~FOR..".A!'ION. ORDER !10. I I .j_ .Se; t6t!/-ST --.,,-------- ' I ti 'b !! ,, ' ' \ 0 .. : ' . .. ~:.;,..:, _,-:, p D 2Ct.'"J 00 ,.,,,.., c,-•:4 ".?.-t··;v i SB /92""° ST. 8 i -2.1'1 l... VOL. __ '-/~I-- . (r, o,Z.5 7 NO~rHWES"T.':','-"N :j,,.U,.'LV:N 7~C'TS , ,_ I l.NVIS.'J,;.MJ 3 _, ., Ai c,.,• s4·z.::.-·w I Co29.'7Z l~.:s.OO ~ ,., !1. ez ~ I '• • • J .o '• , ' ' ffl t'\ ..... •' ,, ' • 0 ' ' A J •• ~ 8 -.,. 91·,1·zv* i b·l'J?·.,,~c:= t • 1,:., ' s ; . L"'!),11,y J'.L•:s.,oO ' g : l1l 3-1.:1' • .JO I 1ot;J1s___j/ -----· --1-----CS\.17: .'-"~).ff! Di!-V,\14Gf';' .,;,n UTILITIES 0 Q o;,;;.!E$6ef I~•H.; .~~· " 4!ili 7!:J ., 7' .. .., ;,:t "'' .. N,=;iJ ;,-:, 'i!O·a-v j c;:10, .. ;: .:-, : .~, . N ~Th.~ND TlTtf INSURANCE COMPAN\ PHllAOELPHIA ~ .. ~ ......... _ .. '-.JI f'l'",V'ILUC.U .b A \.Ul;KU:::!iY fOR THE SOLE Pt!RPOSE OF ASSlSTUCC tu LOCATUIC Tfl,· ·r:aJEr.T PROPERTY AliO NO LIA8ILITY IS ASSL-,,En !'OR l~W;R.\C ::t:HtN THE SKETCH. REFERE~CE 7200LIVEWAY SUITE 1000. SEATTU:. WA5HINGTON98101 Sllout.D BE ~.ADE TO A Sf!RVEY roa f'':RTHf.R n1F0R."A':'I0tf. ORDER NO. 4' I S"° 3, S (., CUS'rol'll!R NO. 8 <f -21'1 l.. VOL. __ '-/~'--PACE __ 'J..!....::(.):....___~ I I t S1:f6e• sr .. ---···--- ' ' II 'b !! If • • \ .. :i,)..:, -• lo D zc,,., 00 ,...,~-·.·-,.·.:-. ..,··;v ~ S/2 192-ST. NORl""wes·r1:·, .... ~N ::;A.K..'CieN ,~c TS I l.NVIS.V,,.J :s " -, • , ., ·-.. Ncf·J·s4'z.:,"'w I Gi2'3. '32 J,..;s.oo )I 1J:t.e2 ~ I • • • J . o '• , ' ~-~ M ,; ~ •' ,. . ' A I a, ! 8 ·.s· 9,·,fz.;• ~ b· ,n·,,,, .... ~ l .. • s '.:, ' ; . '-·~"g ~y ~~-.:··· ' ~--'~_j/ ..3,1'.;t.JO I .I -----· ·-r:!5,'i.O: ,'"CJR 0,e.JJ,\J4Ge;" .,.,11 Ur.'LITli::!S 0 ,, 0 o;..;;.!£56ef r~•n.; j~i. .. ... ~,i 1!:J .. "··'' 'l\t IC.,. !!J ,V$:J :,·:, 'c'O • .. v I ,3;1() 11.<; .:-, : , .. , , '" N ~~f'\5@ . l:=i mt.£ INSURANCE COMPAN, PHIi.ADELPHiA 7200LIVEWAY su,re 1000. SEATllE. WASHINGTON98101 ~ .... ., ......... _,. ""' rr.v.,1.uc.u 11.:> "1..ui;Klt.!lY fOR THE SOLE Pl!RPOSE Ot ASSISTI:.1C ln LOCATING Tl'F' -1:&JECT PROPERTY AtiD ffO LlABlLITY [S ASSL~EO FOR t~r.cr:RAC ::r:H[N 7HE SKETCH. REFEROCE S110U1.D BE ~.ADE TO A Sl.!RVEY ma f':RTHF.R C:IFOR.UA-:'(ON. ORDER NO. 4' I ~ 3, S \o CUS'lO<mR NO. 8 'f -Z.1"'/ '-VOL. __ C/_1 __ Lu \;) 1 Cl N, '-. I I t $1!168-ST . ' -------- fl 'll !! ,, . • \ '· r k ~ 0 .. l ... :..:.:>-.• .;:.,,,;, ~ D zc,., DO N,-.o-·-·-.1-",?.-t··;v ' ill S2 192-ST. OrZ.'57 NaRTHW.ES"T.'~-. .. ~A,. ~A;.~N 7~cr.s IU,V.tS.~,J .:s , -' ., ·- Nci-,·s-,.·zd"'W I 629.'::112 , .... ~oo 1" /J::l.~2 ~ I • • ~ I .0 .. , ' ' ffl "' •':I ,, I, ' .. 0 --A I .. ! 8 -. . • i 4 -I'}?·., .. s:; l ·-~ J~!Jtt1Z'-'.: .. ' < 1.-:,.., ... y ,......., L• :>., Oei _jJ . · 111 ' 3'::i.Jo I totl/S -------->-----CS.\.l'I." .'·CJ,e Qi:,.U,V""G£:" ,;ON, Ur!!.,TleS 0 0 11;,.;;;:£'$&4 £~•s.,.; " .~~· ., 4dl> 7!:J 7'-"' "'t ""' •• .v.:;v ~.-:, .i:'O ·w 1 ,; :10 , .. ,; C, : .~, ' --... N . ...... 0 . 0 • 0 .. ~ le 0 • 0 .. .... !t ~ LI.,,,,,; •o ) ~ ~i -;,.··. -·~-· :L~ ~~ z·.· -. r-.. . : j: ,1 I 1 t ;; ' fl ~;: • I .. <: ~ I· ' t. .. ' \ l • i • <I .... (l'.) ~ t ' .. I ,: ·1 ~ ...... 0 :e 0 0 • 0 .. . "' • 0 8 ,. I .. .. qi '? t ' ,. ~ . \~-,-~~'-.. :~:--3 :z ,-7.'•,, ::. !"!.:..... • ·--.• ·. \':<.".'..:) • o-----! I lR, i, · ..• I • . 1 rl" § ~ : .: II) 0 ,~ I ,_ ·-· I~~ r, . ' ·I . ~S:l .• -1., _,.· f--V~~d.00 • I . I • 1-z-s-£-z-E £ « I 1.f"f3W3SV3 • f. Vl Ill V, ·-· 'r ·- -·-r,·-.. ' \'.'..'.) . . ... · .. -I '. j: " • i \ l ._; I, ----. r -i· ;:--~ ·· ·; t :t: {r,; ~\ · .,i ::l · I• . ~-I t . .':'1. • .. ' :1 \ i) -. . ....... . . , w . rt . ' \lzl !.\ 200,00 D ~ llt-100.00 O l,. NefT' :,4';:s'w ' .. ' A ,. 1-:,, f ~ ~ : ' I.I ( · 11 ti l1 ~\ 6 _....,,l,._· 34~ _JJ!_~ ----~,t ' I I 1-N ~~- f~;";·\ I 0 3~. ,..;;,) ,: ·i u1rn , <( (() -i ,' uJ~ se ,s2-Sc i---· .... ' ~~~l~ . ' • •NESt-i{\i·, ~ ·,1,1~tHi ·fCM. · .·,t:t1Nfi. :;.., , , ·u·1t•· . . ·1·r11 :(.()(, ,. . . ·" ·DATE .. ···-·--.·.1 •• .:,.__,:.-., ·-···· ·!• ... ,.,-;;-·-:-= ·--... - .... ' ' es,i,rr.-~ DR!AINA_ISI!'· 6!!0,1~ · .;:, ,, ::~--.;~ . -'~{~"~\ii.':; LEGEND -~~~- I -• 0 • /lf~E,AA! / w/ ~TAlt'r.~ Or !,'Ne S'-'~"·r.s ll.·· -· • • •• • .~ i,..t/A.'a .. ';~NCI: {.f·oA.L ~-f i~:.;:.\··:·: .. r,c.1 ~·.·· G .· ;,:_,,.. ··• ·,.,lAtr:" ::;·n•t-::'N .:.Y'l.'''/;F..1\/ -.~/, ;-4,_ . i.~1\ ·t~· ~. ,IC:,: .• ,Al',·~·,:· 71.., 7 ne Pc A I ":.'t:· .. ).l '/.: 1-:·.~: :I,/ , ··~''-U/\.".' {.· 4/ .;.1r f.JI. ;1T.S,· /')4(')F. 9..::>, /Al A;i,VG ......... ~_,_._. C '· .... ·1·· "ii .., ~ - /OIi. " . ,.;:.._ 0 ... ·-· I -- '" I \_J ! 1ror1t?rly at C.i:. 188th St.. t .;:.-;., ,IIC:. 1800 llcRtlnkc A Euot.t.lc, \"A 9310S nmr.n :t: I ·----·--•CALii ,'' • ""O A ... ltQYl:D D"l'I onr, !"> • if()-::·, nn;:r:-1·V/'I!~ ,•,i•rr,f~!.','t;':S. r.:r:, ~=.: .. ~. a.__:_.J!t!h :,..,,. .. • --..... :=. ... • • This certificate provides lnfo,mation naclltlsary to evaluate devolopment propo1$21lli, Certificate : 31129 SOOS CREEK WA TEJR AND SIEWER DISTRICT CIERTIJFICA1'E OF WATERAVAlfLABILITY Type: Preliminary J>lut orl'UP ; AppllcQol's Name: l~annyYee Propllied Use: 6 Single Family Rcsidm1ccs Location: Lot:6 Block: Developme11t: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRA Pa~el: 619900 0126 Address: "NO SITE ADDRESS*, RENTON Infor.matlon: Includes parcel 619900 0127 WATER PURVEYOR INFORMATION I. a C Water will he provided by service co1111ection only 10 en oxistins Null incl\ water main. Null feet from U,e :site. Aild I OthtJr b oil Wats't service will requue on imptovcmnt tu tho water syeton1 of: Water service 10 the proposed plat will requite the installation <>nsite and offsile water main. connecting at existing water main located In 120th A.ve SF. and rwllli11g easl llllder access improvcl1l0llhl to the east property llnc oftbc plat and also looping with an exisling main localed at !he south property iitle. Final waler main requirements and layout ""111 be deCl!nllincd ba<cd on iinal site devel<,pment pi•""· All plam· 1111111 meet the requiicn-ts of the KC 1''lre Marshal and Soos Creek Water.and Sower niKldct. l. • ~ ·n,e Wlllor 1)'111en1 I• in confomianco with a Co uni)' approved waltt comp,ebensi ve plan. b rJ The water s)'Stem improv~nt will nq11irc u warcr cnmprchens-ivo plan amendment. 3. a ii£, Tho propoeud project is within tho co,poraa, lilllilS oftbe 4alric~ o, has been granted Boundary Review R<llltd approval for oxtcasion of aen,ice outtide tile dlstrict or city, or is within !ho Coun1y approved service aroa of a ptivato water purveyor. b O Anoc~ation or Boundary Revi<:w Board approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. e lilL Water is/or wlll be •vailable at the rate of flow and duration inuicated below at no less thun 20 (l>i mcasurod at tho nearesl ftre hydtallt 400 feet ftom the buikllns/property (or 11$ marked 011 the attached map): R.ateof Plow; 1,000 gpn1 l>uratlou, 2 lww·s b ! j Water ll)'&tcD'II i• nut· capable nfprovltliog iire flow. Cross Connection Control devices 1nust be In conformance with stale laws. Service is subject to the IIJ)Plicants agreement to comply and perform to make such installation 1111d/or connections to the standards, regulations, requirements and conditions of this Dislrict and such other agency or agencies having jurisdiction. This District is not representing that i1's facilities will be extended or otherwise modified to make such service availRble to the applicant. It is the responsibility of Lhc applicant to make any required extension of faciliticg to sct'Ve their property. J lwoeby .. rlll'y lh•t the above water purvoyor informotlon ls true. 'llltt certification shall he valid for one yenr from data o[ alenaturc. SOOS CReEK WATER & SllWER DISTRICT ----·· Agcocy1'1amo -·--· Supervisor, Devolopmonl Administration ·-·-·~----- ~ ..... ..,,.. ., ... Alic:o R Marshall --··s/tiiiiioiy!I .... -··-u,;; / r,1 •N. I f Y. _,, .. This cartlficate provides Information nec:essa,y Co evaluate development proposals. f'..· '""' --1 u Certificate : 4489 SOOS CREEK WA TJER AN])) SEWER DlIS']['J!UCT CEJR'I'I1Fl!.CA1'E OF SEWEJR AV AilLillJLYTY Type: Praliminll1')' Plat or PUD Applicant's Name: Farm)' Yee Propased Use: 6 Singlo Family Residences Locadon: J.ot: 6 Block: DeveloplDellt: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS5 Parcel: 619900 0126 Address: ,:,NO SITE ADDRESS*, RENTON lnforllllltlon: Includes parcel 619900 0127 SEWER PURVEYOR fNIFOJR..1\1.ATlON 1. • n Sewm serviA:e will be pn,v.idod by """'Ice coonectlon only io aa citiotiug sewer 1l1lWI Null reer ftum lhe aite and lhe sewer sy,1ea1 bas tbs capacity IO •oivo lhe pl'OJl()Sed atea . . b iii!i Othc:r (describe): The proposed plarls located·wilhin !be boundaries ofewcrULID 107, currc11tly in de,;igu antl scbedulcd for construclion in 2005. S<ll'Vice to the proposed lots will be ••ailable wbcll the ,ewer system baa boen ac.:opa:d for aotVlce by Snos Crock Watet and Sower Di&lrlet l, • G2I Tho sewer &ysllltll 11 In comannance ,.;111 • CoW11Y 11J1Proved sewer compr,:henaivo plan. b O 1 be sewer ll)'IICORI improvmient will requite o "'~ comprehensive pl81l amcadmimt. 3, • iitJ Tbb proposed project is within 1ho c;mpon11D limits oflbe district. or ha, bc1:l1 granted Bmmdary Review Board IIPP'°""I for extension of aarvice nutaido !he dislrict or city. b I j ~tioA or Bounduy llevicw Board approval will be necessary to provide semcc. 4, Serricc b 111bjecl to the ronow1as1 Connection CJiatso: Yoo Easement (a); Olhor, Exialin.8 Seo conditions lb above and below. Scrvico is subject to the applicanls agreement to comply and perform to make such installation and/or connccliona to the standards, regulations, requirements and conditions of this District and such olher agi,ncy or agencies havingjurisdictlon. This Distrn;t is not representing that it'• facililics will be extended or othoiwisc:: modified to make such service available to the applicant. Tt is I.be responsibilily oftha i:pplicani lll make any required extension of facilities to serv" their property. • h........,._ _ .. fifv that fba above IGWer purvovor la.form.ntlon ~ true. 1biD certlf1catlon obaD be valid for one -··--.. ------., --·-----... year from date ohllfllature. SOOS CREl!l{ WAT.Ell & SEWEii. DISTRICT .-· ·--~----· Supc,viaor, Dovolopmcnl Administration --Yido-- K.C. D.D.E.S. ® King County · Department of Development ana Envlromnental Services 900 Oakcsdulc Avenue R!!nton, WA D8055-l219 fire District Receipt Fire District # __ 4n ____ _ Name of Project/ Proposal Yee Short Plat Location of Project/ Proposal _1c:.2c:.n_'-:::2:.cSc:.:.cF_1-'9-'nt=hc.:Pc_lc:.":..:."c:.·A=-------------------------- (Address, parcel number, tax account number, legal description)" •one of these required for processing of application 12052 SE 190th Place, Tax Parcels 6199000126 & 6199000127 33 SEC----·--·---·-TWN _ 23_______ _____ ANG.-·· 5 E ____ .. ·-----KROLL PAGE 605 ___ _ Name of Applicant _ Fatm_y Y L& Philip l\11. Yee. ___ _ --------------- Address of Applicant . 11431s238th.St.,.Woodway...!IIIA.980,.-.2u.O __ Telephone Number ___ 4 __ 2_5_3_9_8 __ 44_0_6 _____________________________ _ Description: Type of Project / Proposal Check appropriate box(es) D Apartment / Multifamily D Commercial / Industrial ORetail D Residential: Single Family Residence ODuplex D Subdivision ],():Short Subdivision / Short Plat ORezone D Conditional Use D Unconditional Use D Planned Unit Development D School / Classroom OOther (describe) _________________________________ _ Storz couplings required on Fire Hydrants Issuance of this receipt does not imply an approval, disapproval nor review of referenced project/ proposal. This receipt shall be valid for ·30 days from date of signature . ..itl--lG-ih.2&.1:u 5VF-D\SC LIO Agency Name .-\ ~----------- Distribution: White: Applicant (see below) Yellow: King County Building Services Division Pink: Fire District Note Applicant: at the time of application to DOES the white copy must be presented with project / proposal submittal. 0178 (Rev. 9197) Fire District: mail yellow copy to: King County Building Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Renton, WA 98055-1219 Attn: Fire Engineering K.C. D.D.:C.S. / ll \ ) 1-- STATUTORY WARRP.NTY DEED Filed lo, Record ot RCIIIUOII of NAME M,:. ·,.v, •".i ltl LAND Tltl.E ; ,: . !: r ~NCl COtlPANY , ··~ .,1 " ..,. sta'ti.L C\ can ADORESS11601. :.e11a CQola Rd .•. I nus SPACE 1u:s1:Aveu FOM Ht:COMOl!R'S U$t '. . {fi]@©@DW~ffi' ~:~\" a-0 JUL 2 3 2005 ~ \\-0. K.C. D.:D.E.S. G CITY :4.NOSTATE .:.dllM>rlds, I@. 980 ~ G '.3 .:; 7 ..; 7?; , P" ..... a,uNT't EXCISE lAX PAID ciAR2 21982 -~ ~! :o~nrn ltil': ~;,•.· . ·--~ THEGRANTOR PHILIP 14. YEE AND FANNY Y. YEE, husband and wife,,• Rlct· .. to,..,.;n-•t""'ot TEN OOllARS AND OTHER VALOABLE CONSIDERATIONS •'~ . ·)' •.:'i1n-.~ ·~· inhandpaid.conm,,cnd...-,11,111to GUS J. SAKELARIS AND DENA G. SAKELARIS. husband anci wife. the loUowingdncrmd roal eslllte. litualed in the Coc,nly of King . Su•• ot Wd\ington: The !lest 343.00 feet of Tract 6 of Northwestern~ Tracts. Division No. 5, as per plat thereof recorded In VolUR12 47 of Pl , age 90, In King County, Washington; -· AU O EXCEPT the North 73 feet of ~st 200 feet thereof; TOGETHER tUTH an ea.s t for ingress, egress, drainage and utilities over, under and across the South 30 feet of Tract 6; reserving to the grantors herein an easea:ent for ingress. egress, drainage and utilities over, under and across the South 30 feet of the !!est 343. feet of Tract 6. Situate In tne County of King, State of Washington. SUBJECT TO: That certain Deed of Trust 1n favor of Suburban Coastal Corp., dated· Jun;, 20, 1979, and recorded Jw,e 28, 1979, under Recording No. 790628-0192, which grantees contract, covenant and agree to assume and pay according to conditions thereof and hold grantor herein hannless therefrom; t Eas6t3tlts. restrictions, reservations, covenants, conditions and c ;/ pub11c rights of record. \ (' STATE OF WASHIN~ COUNTYOF King On thfl ~ DelrlOfldly cppocrod mforo mo ...----Pht 11 p M. Yee and Fanny Y. Yee AAIN FILE copy STATE OF WASHINGl'ON COUNTY OF ~~ ~°'-----19-. bafonlmo, lho undarslgnod. • NotcrY PublC In and for tho S\lltO of WDshinalOn, duly contmiuioned ond IWOffl, pc:1nonallycppcwd __________ _ .... -------------,,--tomo lmoan to b:l lhO _______ ,,_, end Sccm.crv. rocp;x:tlvoly, ot th:, .c:o,po,.ctton 1:hatoxccut:od th) torcplng INlrumont. ond cc:lclllO 1cdg::id lhO SDld lnnnamcnt tom thotroo end wolun- u:rv CCI and Cbcd of add co,porotfon, lor tho UICI ond pu,. polOI thoroin mcintion=cf. end Ol'I ooth ltDtOd thllt - -----,----cuthorfaod to oxocuto tho SDid lnAJvfflOftt end that the sod ot"nllOd h thcl torpOrOW mat ot sokt COfPOmion, Whnaamy hcndand ottldcl IOCI hcrato 11ffiacd thO dav end ycor tlm d:olc1 arlnon. Noa:r, Public: In end fof tho Stato ot WcshinQton. t'Qddlno .. --------------- TL-3 A2 ,1116 MAIN FILE C v/dJ_ OPU/ ' ~· . i ; ' ; :, 06 ~ ~) · 1 EA~NT Nu: ";;_23-Sw) & © & a DJ ~ . f/1.Er) i PROJECT A1aa1u> Ull.a II If . ? , S/lffr.r ~~ RECORo AT IIEOuEST Tcmooro.,. Sarv0ldLAgt~5 I OF 2615 41b ~'.~NU'"•U~llffl;:; r:,,..,,.'!fy ] ·•• E. SEArni. ___ ..., : KING i:OUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 58 ··. WA ss,z, K.C. DJ?. i:: s . 10823 3. E. 176TH Sr. 9 7Ji -.3,4j'-. ~~ ; REITTON, !-!ASH I NGTON 98055 l ) '.l1RE~ ; ~:· ;.~~. -· \ F1f.Efi~R-~e~cooj·W-r REQUEST E A S E It E N T R v1> I s, l THIS a>197a·, by (,0 ' INDENTURE: 'made this 12th day of July ~ / and between·' uNG coum NATER DI_ST_R_ICT~-N-0-.~S-B-.-a-m_un_i_c_i_p_a_l __ • ~ / ,-corporation of King County, Washington, hereinafter termed the "Grantee", 0 and A.H.N. Inc. "' . ----------------------------------- 0 , hereinafter termed the "Grantors". 0------------------· .... QO ! ,._ lfITNESSBTH: That the said Grontors for a valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by the Grantee, does by these presents convey, grant and ffllttant unto the Grantee e perpetual easement for water -mains and appurtonmaces under, through, above, over llUd across the follolrlng described property situated tn·ll'.ing County, Washington, tofether with all after acquired title of the Grantors herein, and QOre part cularly · i I ' ' ' 1 I ( I I I .described-as follows: · · · Tba Soutb 30 foot of Tract '• lilorthuQotern Garden. 'tra.cta. DJ.:doioo s. o.ccord1ag to tbe plat recor~ ta Voluc::2 47 of Plats. pagci 90, in Ung County, Va.shiugtoo .. .. ... ------······ ···-·' 'lefiut'- 1% EXCISl: TAX NOT REQUIRED . ~ Co. Re<:Ofds DivisioA· e, 9 /kefof' , Ospl!Q The Grantor warrants that their· title is free and clear of all encumbrances except: The Grantor acknowledges that part of the consideration being p'id by the Grantee :ts for any and all damage resulting to or resulting hereafter from the possible interfe1ence oft.he natural flow of surface waters by Grantee·s digging of pipe lines which may disturb the soil composition within said easement. I i i I 1 I I I I \ I i . ! ~~-,~. -· ... :·J ... ~·., • (. ' ' ' ' ! I \ • ' I I i I I I L ('. ' ! ', ~ ~}1 Tho said Grcntoo shall hovo tho right without prior instttuti.oo of auy suS.t or proceeding at lav. at such ti.mo ao may "4 neceosary, to enter upon daa eaBOMat for the purpose of cooetl'\lctlns, repairing, o1ter1cg or re......,truct11111 oe.ld voter lllQ/.u, or ...runs uy coanectlooa thereeith, vlthout :lncurTing GDy lo30,1 obligo.tloa. or llabilicy therefor, pt"o- videcl that auch conotr.ac:ting, ropair.i.ng, altering or recoaauucttaa of said water IMin liha11 be accompllotw,d lo. ouch o. mmmor that tbo private Ulprovec::na.to md.sti.ng 1n this . easHaent shall not be diaturbod OT door:royod. or in tho OVOllt tba.t tba.y 11ra disturbed or deecroyed, they wlll be ropJ.acod in ao good a condlt1oa co thcq vara :la::::ld1ately before the property vaa ealtered upoa tv tbt sold Grantco. the Grat&tor shall retain the rigbt to uoo tho surfoco of dao eaM:nnnt U such use doea '1ot interfere v1tb iastallar::loa of tba uot.tY c::::,,tn. Bouovor, tho Granto't Gboll not erect build!ngo or otruc!'Urao .. on tbo eosomat durtaa tho cmietcr.lCQ of OGicl oaaacant. n.o eacemaat, durlaa, :lta -auatOllco, obo.11 be Q covonaat rumd.aa vicb tbo land and ab.all. be b:lndiag Oll the 8UCCG1i1D0:-0• heirs. and CDOigDO of botb of tbarOO hereto. Ill lll:1M!SS IIIIBBIIDP, ua bav<> oot our bando aad ooolo t 11 ~ day of July 19~7~8~~~ ... ,.,11u,,,,,,,~~ • . .• If • '•;._ co .... -co"" tbol#M<4d: a..v.le& r«M-1 n-~ of the corporot:lon that mmc:uted tho widd.a and forogoiaa luai~ admavlodgod said iaaitrun:::mt co be the !'ree and voluntary act and "deecl of o:! d 9rpo-rotian. fo:: tho uses and purpoooa tbe.reJa C31lt:lancd. and on oath seated tba.t :::Z--~ v.:D/varo aut.bod .. sed to e:m:cute aaid :l118trum:ant and that tbe seal affim.d 1o t c:.orporoto aoo.1 of said corporattc:.l. . . IN lll'DIESS UIIIIIIBOF I have be.....,.to sec my hand aad affixed my offic1al and.year flrot above written. 2. There ,so/are aot spec1a1 conditions attached to tbia easeceat • The special concU.Uono, if any, allll the C:fB1dorati01l iot~ithlu oud foregoing OOOOClllt are hereby approved and accepted thio~da:, of _ , 192'.tot A rogulor open public meeting of the Board of Commleaioaera of K IIATEU. DIST11ICT 11(1. 58. By Id P~i~ actd ? end isaloaer BASl!l!ll!HT HO. ~~.-, ..• •.·;.:•\';. ~---······ -·· ... ---·· ······-'-····-· . ' ! l I 1 i I { i .\ • ' ' I { ! , ' . . .. AFTER RECORDING PLEASE RETuRN To: WIUIAMS CLARK PSC 6161 NE 175™, SullE 200 l<ENMoRE, WA 98028 Grantor(s): Grantee(s): Beulafiteded Property Yu Lot No.: Bunbned Property Te Lot No. ~elSE fAX NOT REQUIIU!D King County Re~ BY: /(9ax: , Dapuly I Philip M. Yee and Fanny Y. Yee Anakllly Trofimenko and Rlmma Trofimenko 61990(M)210 619900-0126 and 619900-0127 This Temporary Use Easement is made Ulis I~ of November 2004, by and between AnalqJiy T rofimenko and Rimma Trofimen((q. hereinafter termed the "Grantee". and El!i!!!!. M. Yee and Fanny Y. Yee. hereinafter termed 0 Grantor. • Grantor and Grantee are collectively referred lo as "Parties." BAC~GROUND 1. Granlor's Property/ "Burdened Parcel" Grantor is the legal owner of land located al 12040 SE 19{)111 Place and 12052 SE 190"' Place. Renton, Washington, tax lots 619900-0126 and 619900-0127, legally described as follows: Temporary Easement Page 1 of5 Yee-Trofimenko days, Gran tor may remove the shed, fence and other encroachment and bill Grantee for the related cosls. Grantor shaD have no obligation to re-install the removed fence and shed. 7. This easement shall continue until cancel pursuant to paragraph 6 or when the Burdened Property is sold, whichever is earlier. 8. If any suit or action Is conunenced by either party, or their successors and/or assigns, to enforce any rights under this agreement or regmdlng any encroachment, in addition to costs provided by statute, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of aflorney's fees In such sum as the Court may atf]Udge Just and reasonable. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have set our hands and~ this~ of November 2004. Grantor: Temporary Easement Page 3 of5 Yee-Trolimenko Grantee: Rlmma Trollmenko ·, ' Tract 6, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS. DMSION NO. 5, according to the plat thereof recorded In Volume 47 of Plats, page 90, records of King County, Washington; Except the West 343 feet lhereof. 2. Grantee's Property / "Benefited Paicer Grantee Is the legal owner of the property located to the south of Burdened Property, with an address of 19107-121ST PLSE, 98055, Renton, WA98055, tax lot No. 6199000210, legally described as follows: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRS DIV #5 LOT 3 OF KC SHORT PlAT NO 582084 RECORDING NO 8404200923 SD SHORT PlAT OAF - TRACT 10 NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO 5 LESS W 113 FTOFS240FT 3. Encroachment Grantee has a wood shed and fence across a portion of the lhe souttiem most three feet of the Burdened Property. The encroachment was indenlified in a Sepetmber 2004 survey by Sadler/Barnard & Associates, Inc., a licensed surveyor In the Slate of Washington. A drawing of the properties and the encroachment is included as Exhibit 'N for rereience. 4. Grantor has no Immediate use for Burdened Property and Grantee wishes to leave the fence and shed in place temporarily. The parties agree as follows: 5. Grantor grants a temporary easement to Grantee along and across a portion of the Southern three feel of the burdened property for the expressed purpose of allowing Grantee to leave his shed and fence temporarily In place. 6. Grantee agrees to relocate his fence, along with any fencing materials, away from the Burdened Property at his own cost, at any time, upon 30-days notice from Grantor. If Grantee fails to prompfly comply with Grantor's request to relocate the fence within 30 Temporary Easement Page2 of 5 Yee· Trolimenko ; STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING ) ss. On this ).?,fl day of November 2004, before me pelSOllaDy appemed PHILIP M. YEE and FANNY Y. VEE. lo me known lo be the indlvlduals described In and who executed the wflhln and foregoing instrurmmt, and acknowledged said inslrument 1D be the free and volunlary act and deed of said Granlols, for the uses and purposes lhel8ln mentioned. WITNESS my hand and offlclal seal here1o affixed the day and year above written. STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING )ss. On !his __ day of Novembar 2004, before me pe,sonaUy appeared .Analpliy Troflmenko and Rlmma Troftmenko. ID me kno\'/n lo be the lndMduals descrim!d in and who executed 1he wi!hin and ro,egomg Instrument, and atknorula illjlld Ed fnstlumant 1D be the free and voluntmy act and deed of said Grantees, for the uses and purposes lh9rein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and offlclal seal herell> affixed the day and year above wrlllen. :·:·? · .. ~· ,, .. ~ ~· .. Temporary Easement Page4 of 5 Yee -Trofimenko My commission expires: 3 · 3 0 · 0 ~ \ . - • ElthlbitA Fence located north of property line I ' I I 611!9DDDUat as+ft 1 I BREVIK Temporary Easement Page 5 of5 Yee -Trolimenko / I f I ' ,J I 2.2· ~ ~- 1 lR O Fl MENK O I ~~ . ' AFTER REcoRDING PI.EAsE RETURN To: WILLIAMS Cl.ARK PSC 6161 NE 1'75™, SUITE 200 KfNMoRE, WA 98028 Gmvto,(s): Gmtufs): Bermlll8llad ~ Tax Lot No.: BurdQ!ned ProFffi1I T111 Lot tile>. 065 EXelSE 'fAX NOf REQUIRE!) King2:! Rrf Divlaion BY: /~¥ . Deputy Philip M. Yee and Fanny Y. Yee Dennls A. Brevik and Deborah Brevik 619900-0186 619900-0126 BACKGROUND 1. Grantor's Property / 'Burdened Parcer Granter is the legal owner of land located at 12040 SE 190\h Place, Renton, Washington, tax lols 619900-0126, legally described as follows: Temporary Easement Page 1 of5 Yee· Brevik . I 0-I ( i' . NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRS DIV#5 E 143 FT OF W 486 FT OF TRACT 6 M<A LOT B OF REVISED KC SHORT SUBD NO 07257 2. Grantee's Property / "Benefited Parcel" Grantee is the legal owner of lhe property located to the south of Burdened Property, wi!h an address of 19103-12111 Place SE, Renton, WA 98055, tax lot No. 6199000186, legally described as follows: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRS DIV #5 LOT 4 OF REVISED KC SHORT PLAT NO 879082 RECORDING NO 8202190368 SD PLAT OAF -TRACT 9 OF NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO 5 LESS E 7 FT OF S 240 FT THOF 3. Eneroar;hmenl Grantee has oonslrucled a wood fence across the SOU1hem most lluee feet of the Burdened Property. The enCIOaChmenl was indantiffed in a Sepelmber 2004 survey by Sadler/Barnard & Associates, Inc., a f1C811sed surveyor in the Slate of Washington. A drawing of the properties and the encroac:hmenl Is included as Exhibit 'A" for reference. 4. Grantor has no immediate use for Burdened Property and Grantee wishes to leave Ille fence in place temporanly. AQ¥88~ The parties agree as follows: 5. Gran~_grants ii temporary ~Ip~~ a.!Q!l9 ~-~ South three feet of the burdsned prope,ty for the expressed purpose of allowing Grantee to leave his fence temporarily in place. 6. Grantee agrees to relocate his fence, along with any fencing materials, away from the Burdened Property at his own cost, at any lime, upon 30-days nottce from Grantor. If Grantee falls to prompUy comply with Grantol's request to relocate the fence within 30 days, Grantor may remove the fence and other encroachment and biD Grantee for the related costs. Grantor shall have no obfigalion to reinstall the removed fence material. T empi:>rary Easement Page2of5 Yee-Bmvik .. " 7. This easement shall continue until cancel pursuant to paragraph 6 or when the Burdened Property Is sold, whichever Is ea~ier. 8. If any suit or action Is commenced by ellher party, or their successors and/or assigns, to enforce any rights under this agreement, or regarding any encroachment, In addition ID costs provided by slalUte, Ille substantially prevailing party shall be enliUed lo an award of attorney's fees in such sum as the Court may adjudge Just and reasonable. ;. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have set our hands and seals lhis "J.1' day of November 2004. Grantor: Temporary Easement Page 3 of5 Yee· Brevik Grantee: ~ . . . STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING ) ss. D::tcJ/, On 1hfs .fCIC_ day of November 2004, before ma personaDy appeared PHILIP M. YEE and FANNY Y. YEE. to me known to be the Individuals described in and who execuled Ille within and foregoing inslrUmen!, and acknowledged said Instrument ID be the flee and vo!unlary act and deed of said Gran!Drs, for Ute uses and pwposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and olllclal seal her8ID affixed the day and year above wlitten. STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING )ss. On ttris /o~ day of November 2004, before me personally eppee,ed DENNIS A. BREVIK and DEBORAH BREYJK, ID me ltnown ID be the Individuals desalbed in and who execul8d the wilhin and fulegohl!J lns1rumenl, and aclmowladged sa!II insllument ID be the free and voluntary act and deed of sa!d Gla,tees, for Ute uses and pu,poses therein mentioued. WITNESS my hand and olllcl8I seal hemlD affixed the day and year above wrfflen. .-·.~ .......... . . . ·. Temporary Easement Page 4 of5 Yee-Breu11< q(~~ PrlntName: K.:t f-h€"' ne G /illq,,c wJIP NOTARY PUBLIC In and for the Sla1e of Washinglon Residing at f?.erJ n,.a-,,,. ~ • , I BREVIK I Temporary Easement Page5of5 Yee-Brevik EldllbitA - ~ ~-I TROAMENKO 1 · D ® N CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP ANY 701 FIFTH AVENUE, #3400, SEATILE, WA 98104 ORDERNO: YOURNO: UNITNO: LOAN NO: PHONE: (206)628-5623 FAX: (206)628-5657 001144207 YEE SHORT PLAT 10 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT 0 R D E R R E F E R E N C E I N F O R M A T I O N SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER: SELLER: PURCHASER/BORROWER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1 PHILIP M. YEE AND FANNY Y. YEE WASHINGTON Our Title Commitment dated 08/19/04 at 8:00 A.M. is supplemented as rollows: 0 PARAGRAPH NUMBER(S) 1 OF OUR COMMITMENT IS (ARE) ELIMINATED. p Q THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THIS COMMITMENT SINCE AUGUST 19, 2004, EXCEPT THE MATTERS NOTED HEREINABOVE. OCTOBER 13, 2004 AUTHORIZED BY: MIKE HARRIS ~ [E (G ~ ~ w ~ [DJ'' DEC 2 7 2004 K.C. D.D.E.S. 0 ... N CHICAGO TITLl ,l"SURANCE COMP ANY 701 FIFfH A VENUE, #3400, SEATILE, WA 98104 ORDER NO: YOUR NO: UNIT NO: LOANNO: PHONE: (206)628-5623 FAX: (206)628-5657 001144207 YEESHORTPlAT 10 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT 0 R D E R R E F E R E N C E I N F O R M A T I O N SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER: SELLER: PURCHASER/BORROWER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1 PHILIP M. YEE AND FANNY Y. YEE WASHINGTON Our Title Commitment dated 08/19/04 at 8:00 A.M. is supplemented as follows: 0 PARAGRAPH NUMBER(S) 1 OF OUR COMMITMENT IS (ARE) ELIMINATED. p 0 THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THIS COMMITMENT SINCE AUGUST 19, 2004, EXCEPT THE MATTERS NOTED HEREINABOVE. OCTOBER 13, 2004 AUTHORIZED BY: MIKE HARRIS SUPPLCOM/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLB INSURANCE COMP ANY 701 FIFfH A VENUE, #3400, SEATILE, WA 98104 Order No.: 001144207 YourNo.: YEESHORTPLAT LANG ASSOCIATES, INC. 10658 RIVIERA PLACE NORTHEAST SEATILE, WASHINGTON 98125 ATTN: DE-EN LANG PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON 1/1 Enclosed are your materials on the above transaction. If you have any questions regarding these materials, please contact us. Thank you for this opportunity to serve you. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UNIT 10 -YOUR COMPLETE BUILDER/DEVELOPER SERVICE CENTER WE HA VE EXPANDED TO SERVE ALL YOUR TITLE INSURANCE NEEDS RELATED TO LAND ACQUISITION, DEVELOPMENT FINANCING AND PROPERTY SUBDMSION. MIKEHARRIS TITLE OFFICER (206) 628-5623 (E-MAIL: MICHAELHARRIS@CTT.COM) KEITH EISENBREY TITLE OFFICER (206) 628-8377 (E-MAIL: KEITH.EISENBREY@CTT.COM) STEVE KINSELLA CONDO COORDINATOR (206) 628-5614 (E-MAIL: STEVE.KINSELLA@CTT.COM) BOB BLOEDEL SENIOR TmE EXAMINER FAX NUMBER: (206) 628-5657 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NEW ADDRESS ALERT: CHICAGO TITLE has moved its Seattle office from the 18th to the 34th floor of the Bank of America Tower. Effective January 20, 2004, our new address is: 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3400 Seattle, WA 98104 Our phone and fax numbers are still the same, but please note that our e-mail addresses have changed, as shown above. TITLETI/RDA./0999 fUCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP"(' 3400 COL'Dlm:r.A CBN"l"BR, 701 S'l'H AVK SBA'l'TLB, NA 98104 Order No.: 1144207 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE Certificate for Filing Proposed Short Plat In the matter of the short plat submitted for your approval, this Company bas examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of KING County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following descn"bed land situate in said KING County, to-wit: SEE SCHEDULE A (NEXT PAGE) VESTED IN: PHILIP M. YEE AND FANNY Y. YEE, HUSBAND AND WIFE EXCEPTIONS: SEE SCHEDULE B ATTACHED CHARGE: $200. 00 TAX: $ 17.60 Recordsexaminedto August 19, 2004 at 8:00 A.M. CHICAGO 1111..E INSURANCE COMPANY By SHPLATA/12-5-90/EK f'""'<uCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP,r"'. SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION Order No.: 1144207 TRACT 6, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS, DIVISION NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 47 OF PLATS, PAGE 90, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 343.00 FEET THEREOF; TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS, DRAINAGE AND UTILITIES OVER UNDER AND ACROSS THE SOUTH 30 FEET OF THE WEST 343 FEET OF SAID TRACT 6. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY r ' ClllCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OrderNo.: 1144207 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULEB This certificate does not insure against loss or damage by reason of tbe following exceptions: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in tbe public records or attaching subsequent to tbe effective date hereof but prior to tbe date tbe proposed insured acquires.for value of record tbe estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by tbe public records. C. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of tbe premises. D. Easements or claims of easements not shown by tbe public records. E. Any lien, or right to lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' compensation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as imposed by law, and not shown by tbe public records. F. Liens under tbe Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. H. General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding or in the same becoming a lien. I. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. J. Water rights, claims, or title to water. K. THIS REPORT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS($1000.00). SHPLATB/03H94/soc CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ("UCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP{"" SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULEB (Continued) EXCEPTIONS Order No.: 1144207 A 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES A STRIP OF LAND 20 FEET IN WIDTH AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT AUGUST 20, 1968 6394101 s 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 58 WATER MAINS AND APPURTENANCES THE SOUTH 30 FEET, AND OTHER PROPERTY OCTOBER 2, 1978 7810020168 c 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: DISCLOSED BY: IN FAVOR OF: PURPOSE: AFFECTS: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: DELINEATION ON THE KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP, AND ATTACHMENT TO RECORDED INSTRUMENT NOT DISCLOSED DRAINAGE, UTILITIES, AND UNKNOWN OTHER USES SOUTHERLY PORTIONS OCTOBER 2, 1978 7810020168 4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: INGRESS, EGRESS, DRAINAGE, AND UTILITIES THE SOUTH 30 FEET MARCH 22,. 1982 8203220316 5. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS, NOTES, DEDICATIONS AND SETBACKS, IF ANY, SET FORTH IN OR DELINEATED ON THE PLAT OF NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV. NO. 5. , 6. TERMS AND CONDITIONS, IF ANY, CONTAINED IN KING COUNTY UNRECORDED SHORT SUBDIVISION NUMBER 07257. THE SUBDIVISION IS REFERENCED IN THE KING Cl-llCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY f""DCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP.,.Y-- -. COUNTY TAX ROLL. SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULEB (Continued) · EXCEPTIONS a 7. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS "AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Order No.: 1144207 BETWEEN: AND: RECORDED: AHM, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 58 OCTOBER 6, 1978 RECORDING NUMBER: 7810060608 REGARDING: TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE 11 8. ROAD MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: MARCH 22, 1991 9103220786 r 9. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS COMMITMENT IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS AS DEFINED IN THE POLICY TO ISSUE. THE PARTIES TO THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRIOR TO CLOSING IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. J NOTE l: GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAID IN FULL: YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: AMOUNT BILLED AND PAID: AFFECTS: A WESTERLY PORTION. NOTE 2: 2004 619900-0126-07 4250 $ 20,000.00 $ 0. 00 $ 238.26 GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES,_ PAID IN FULL: YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: 2004 619900-0127-06 4250 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 20,000.00 $ 0. 00 CHICAGO 1ITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SHPIATB3/12-12-90/EK F"IlCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP.o'j" ' SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULEB (Continued) EXCEPTIONS AMOUNT BILLED AND PAID: $ 238.26 AFFECTS: AN EASTERLY PORTION. L NOTE 3: Order No.: 1144207 THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 64.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: PORTION LOT 6, VOLUME 47 PLATS PG 90. AS OF AUGUST, 19, 2004, THE TAX ACCOUNTS FOR SAID PREMISES ARE 619900-0126-07 AND 619900-0127-06. END OP SCHBDULE B SHPL\TB3/lZ..12-90/EK CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ··O CHICAGO TITL{ .'1SURANCE COMPANY C 701 FIFTH A VENUE, #3400, SEA TILE, WA 98104 PHONE: (206)628-5623 FAX: (206)628-5657 IMPORTANT: This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon . I ,. ' • ., < ·--·--i--- I"'·· : N t -~ ~ ~ f ~ ~- ' ' ~ f i' .. -l~ ,;! ' "' > .. .":r· .. 0 !:'! ~-]. •· ·~ . ,,, •• .. . .;~ . . ~-: ' ' J . · l I ... •• • •• ,,. ,, •• ·-'· 5:;;:E;...· ..:'9c;;,2_N..:D-''"-ST;... l)2~,30 • •• ; 1 I! )$ "' !! II l:f 12 0 .. .. ~ ' I • -·1 ; • i;,r i ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ' ~ ~, 0 ' .. " ~·· •'f.;;, . • • ,. .. ' MAP RDA 0999 Application No. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING file Number· } } ss. } Applicatioo Name· Yee Sbart Plat Parcel Number· 6199000126 & 6199000127 Project I ocalicD' 12os2 SF 19oth Place AFFIDAVIT CONCERNING SENSITIVE AREAS COMPLIANCE The under signed, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says: 1. That the affiant is competent to be a witness herein; 2. That the affiant is the applicant for the above project; [pJ IE a; lE ll WI fE /ffJ o::c 2 7 2oa4 1DJ K.c. D. o.r.s. 3. That to the best of the affiant's knowledge the sensitive areas on the development proposal site have not been illegally altered; and 4. That th affiant has not previously been found in violation of sensitive areas regulations for any pr perty in King County, or, alternatively, that if there have been any violations, such /. violatio s have been cured to the satisfaction of King County. V ( aft&~ 'ie&1A~1 WA Date and Place (City & State) I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. @ KIi COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL CH1:;..,KL1ST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project: Yee Short Plat 2. Name of applicant: Fanny Y. & Philip IVI. Yee 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant Contact Person Fanny Y. & Philip IVI. Yee LANG ASSOCIATES, INC. 11431-238th St. · 10658 Riviera Place N.E. Woodway, WA 98020 Seattle, WA 98125 425 398-4406 206 306-8880 Attn: De-En Lang 4. Date checklist prepared: December 21, 2004 5. Agency requesting checklist: King County Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Land development portion of the project to be completed by December 2005. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. None. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be ·prepared, directly related to this proposal. Field topography and Wetland study. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None are known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Preliminary and final plat approval; sewer, water, road & storm plan approval; clearing, grading, and building permits; FPA approval. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The development of a 6 lot single-family short subdivision on 0.96 (41,935 sq-ft) acres of R- 6 zoned land. The project would have public sewer, water and private streets. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known. Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. 12052 SE 190th Place, the site is in Section 33 Township 23 North, Range 5 Eas(W.IVI. King County, Washington. \D) ( t { \\ "l'!J \;;, M . ~ ::207:: (i) Yee Short Plat-SEPA Checklist Page 1 L O 4 ~~IFU Qi~ "'' B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (underline one): Elat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other ____ _ b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 5 % c. What general types of soils on the site (for examples, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them arid note any prime farmland According to USDA Soils Conservation Services, the site consists of AgB. d. Are there surface conditions or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None are known. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filing or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Construction of streets will require approximately 1,700 cubic yards of cut to be utilized for on-site fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. There could be a short tenn increase in potential for on site erosion where soils are exposed during site preparation and construction. Erosion control practices will be followed during construction to minimize erosion. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction? Approximately 70 % of the site will be covered by roads, driveways, walkways and houses. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to earth, if any. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan will be submitted to the County for approval. Construction phase erosion coritrol tneasures typically include the use of hay bales, check dams, siltation ponds, geotextile barriers (silt barriers), controlled surface grading, and early seeding of disturbed areas. Dry season clearing and grading whenever possible. 2. Air a. What type of emission to the air would result from the proposal during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known. Dust and engine exhaust during construction and fireplace smoke and automobile exhaust when the homes are occupied. Yee Short Plat-SEPA Checklist Page 2 b. Alhere any off-site sources of emissions "' odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. Confonnance with the Washington State Clean Air Act (WSCAA) requires the use of all known, available and reasonable means of controlling air pollution, including dusl All activities on the project site will confonn withWSCAA. 3. Water a. Surface 1) Is there any surface water body in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river if flows into. A small non-regulated wetland at the northeast comer of the site is mostly on abutting property. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Homes and street will be within 200' of the wetland. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the areas of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Filling of the non-regulated wetland is most likely by home homer(s). 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. D.N.A. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. D.N.A. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharge of waste materials to surface water? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground Common pollutants associated with residential development may eventually, after pass through water quality facilities, drain into nearby waters. 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No ground water will be withdrawn. Increases in impervious surfaces would reduce while vegetation removal would increase the amount of water being recharged to ground water. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example, domestic sewage; industrial, Yee Short Plat-SEPA Checklist Page 3 containing the following chemicals .... ; agrici.. .. ural; etc.).Describe the general size of the system, the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. Public sewer serves the proposal. c. Water Runoff (including storm water) 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Runoff from roofs, paved areas; and landscaped yards will be collected by storm drains and may eventually flow into nearby water. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface water? If so, generally describe. The detention or siltation system will reduce the amount of waste material entering ground or surface water. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. Detention system, grass swale and on-site infiltration where possible. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: JLdeciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other JL evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other JLshrubs _ grass _ pasture _ crop or grain ..JL wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _ other types of vegetation On-Site Vegetation consists of scattered douglas firs, big leaf maples and red alder with an understory of salal and oregon grape. Most of the site was obviously logged years ago. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Approximately 80 % of the native vegetation will be removed and partially replaced with residential landscaping. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. D.N.A. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Significant vegetation retention plan will be prepared before construction to ensure retention of trees in perimeter buffer. Individual homeowners or builders will install residential landscaping. The use of native materials is encouraged. Yee Short Plat-SEPA Checklist Page 4 • 5. Animals a. Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawks, heron, eagle, sooghjrd, other: Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: The birds and animals found on the site are typical of that wooded area disturbed by nearby houses and human activities. b. list any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Do not know. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. Residential landscaping may enhance wildlife somewhat. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and natural gas will be the main source of energy used for heating, cooking and lighting. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Clearing for the development may increase solar access to property north of the project. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Better solar orientation and insulation are encouraged. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. D.N:A. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. D.N.A. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: D.N.A. b. Noise 1) What type of noise exists in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic noises from nearby streets. Yee Short Plat.SEPA Checklist Page 5 2) What type and level of noise would be create:d by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hour's noise would come from the site. Construction noises at 80 to 90 DBA range 50' from noise sources may be expected during working hours. 3) Proposed measures to control noise impacts, if any. Out door construction activities will be limited to daytime hours. 8. Land and Shoreline a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties: The site is vacant, single-family home subdivision to the south, large lots to the north and west, a proposed single-family subdivision (Soos Creek Plat) to the easl b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. D.N.A. c. Describe the structures on the site. None ori site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? D.N.A. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The site is currently zoned R-6. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? King County Comprehensive Plan designated the site URBAN. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? D.N.A. . h. Has part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. None. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 18 persons would reside in the completed project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? D.N.A. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: The proposal is providing 6 new housing units. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and project land uses and plans, if any: The proposed use and density complies with existing land use policy, and is consistent with current land use trends in the area. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. 6 units of middle -income housing. Yee Short Plat-SEPA Checklist Page 6 • b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. D.N.A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: The project will provide 6 quality-housing units in a choice location. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest heights of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas, what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest structure is approximately 35 feet high. Principal exteriors building material to be bricks or woods. b. What view in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? In ward view from off site would be altered from existing partially wooded area to a suburban rural residential development. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Residential landscaping would reduce aesthetic impact. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light and glare will be proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Automobile, house and street lights after dark. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? O.N.A. c. What existing off-site source of light or glare may affect your proposal? Automobile lights on adjacent streets. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: D.N.A. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Boulevard Lane Park-1/8 miles east Kentridge HS/Park-1 mile south Renton Park-1 mile north b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. D.N.A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: On-site tot/children play areas will be provided. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on or proposed for national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on the site? If so, generally describe. D.N.A. Yee Short P!at-SEPA Checklist Page 7 • b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None are known, but there is very little evidence available at this time. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: In the event that cultural materials are disclosed during construction, work in the immediate vicinity should be discontinued and the State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation notified. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to existing streets system. Show on-site planstl, if any. 120th Ave SE a neighborhood collector via SE 190 Pl. a local street. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? METRO bus Route# 163 and 169 run on 106th Ave SE o/. miles west of the projecl Park & ride lot located at Renton 5 miles north. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? A minimum of 2 parking spaces per lot will be provided and none will be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Approximately 560 feet of new private streets within the project would be required to be developed. e. · Will the project use (of occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. D.N.A. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Approximately 60 A.W.D.T. at the completion of the project, with the peak occurring at 7:00 -9:00 am and 4:00 -6:00 PM. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. The developer will make fairshare traffic mitigation contributions to needed off-site road and traffic improvements per County ordinances. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The proposal will result in an increased need for services as no development currently exists on the site. The impact will be minimal, however, and can be accommodated by existing service purveyors. Yee Short Plat..SEPA Checklist Page 8 b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct 11,1pacts on public services, if any: The project will be designed and constructed with adequate water pressure, properly located fire hydrants and streets that allow adequate access for aid, fire, and police protection vehicles. School mitigation fees will be paid according to adopted County ordinances. 16. Utilities a. Underline utilities available at the site: Electricity nah1cal gas, water refi1se seNice, telephone, sanitaQC sewer, septic systems, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The following utilities are available on site or within a reasonable distance, on site extension of these utilities will be required: Sewer: Soos Creek Water & Sewer District Water: Soos Creek Water & Sewer District Power: Puget Sound Energy Telephone: Qwest C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision . . ··"e-.. -Signature:_ ,,· December 27 2004 De-En Lang, Planner/ Designer Date Submitted Lai file# Yee SP sepa Yee Short Plat-SEPA Checklist Page 9 ® King County Road Services Division Department ofTransportatlon 201 South Jackson Street Seattle. WA 98104-3856 May 6, 2004 De-En Lang Lang Associates, Inc. 10658 Riviera Place NE Seattle, WA 98125 RE: Transportation Concurrency Exemption File #04-04-28-01. Parcels 6199000-126. 127 Dear Mr. Lang: Thank you for your April 28, 2004, application for a Certificate of Transportation Concurrency. The King County Department of Transportation has determined that a Certificate of Transportation Concurrency is not needed for your project. As of March 12, 2001, according to King County Code, Section 14.70.15.A2, any short subdivision within the urban growth area is exempt from Transportation Concurrency. This letter does not guarantee a development permit. Please take this letter with you tc, the Department of Development and Environmental Services at 900 Oaksdale Avenue SW in Renton when you apply for your development permit. · If you should have any questions, please contact Rebecca Campeau, Transportation Planner, at (206) 263-4722 or rebecca.campeau@mctrokc.gov. Sincerely, . ..,,::: / ,-• ..• \ _;.. . . V""''o/ ~ ... ..,U..,/. 1· ". Linda Dougherty (__, Director LD:RW:lc cc: Phillip & Fanny Yee, Property Owner Rebecca Campeau, Transportation Planner {fJ IE rt; rE U WI f€ fill DEC 2 7 20D4 ~) K.C. D.D.E.S. L(U)4h§({)065 ~ rM,Jb\Ill\!l irUIL~ lCOl?V { PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT Parcel-num~r 6J90.00I26. Parcel number 619000127 A part of NORHTWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVJSION NUMBERS King County, WA PREPARED FOR -Fanny Yee C/0 Lang Associates, Inc. 10658-Riviera-Place NE Seattle, WA 98125 December 27, 2004 Prepared for and on behalf of TLP ·Pacific; LLC 17624 NE 30th Place . Redmond, Washington 98052 'f1R Yee Short Plat Section I. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Appendices A. B. C. TABLE OF CONTENTS Description Page Number Project Overview Conditions and Requirements Summary Off-site Analysis 3 3-5 5 Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design 6 Conveyance Systems Analysis and Design 7 Special Reports and Studies 7 Other Permits 7 ESC Analysis and Design 7 Bond Quantity, Facility Summaries, Declaration of Covenant 8 Operations and Maintenance Manual 8 Figures: I. · TIR Worksheet 2. Site Location 3. Drainage Basins & Sub-basins Off-site Analysis Drainage System Table & Map Drainage Complaint Analysis 2 of 11 12/23/2004 TIR Yee Short Plat SECTION 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW The proposed development consists of the subdivision of 6 residential lots and an associated private road to service those lots form two existing 0.48 acre lots. The project is also proposing a recreation area in the southeasterly portion of the site. Impervious surfaces will include the residential house roofs, driveways, walkways and the associated private road to access the . property for 120th Ave. SE. The proposed short plat will also require the installation of utilities to support the proposed res~dential development. SECTION 2. CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY The existing lots combined are 0.96 acres of R6-SO zoned properties that is undeveloped. The majority of the site is undeveloped with vegetation ranging from native trees to brush and grasses. Existing Grades slope from the west to the east approximately 4.0%. . . Site access is provided via 120th Ave. A private road will be required to access the proposed 6 lots from 120th Ave. SE which is classified as a neighborhood collector. This section of the TIR is intended to meet the agency specific requirements for a report addressing all Core and Special Requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Manual. Core Requirement 1. Discharge at the Natural Location. The site currently drains from the west to the east portion of the site. The site is currently heavily · vegetated and any substantial flow across the site appears to sheet flow from west to east. From evaluation of the survey it appears off site drainage form the north could be conveyed to the existing wetlands on the easterly boundary of the site. This drainage path will be maintained. The existing discharge point for this site is along the east boundary line. The proposed development to the east has included this area as described above in its calculations for infiltration. Core Requirement 2.. Offsite Analysis A level one downstream analysis has been prepared and is provided in Appendix B of this TIR. The upstream analysis investigation reveals approximately 3 acres of property will release stormwater in the direction of the proposed property. Storm runoff will be generated from 3 of II 12/23/2004 TIR Yee Short Plat residential roofs, drives and landscaped areas. Arial topo revealed the majority of this area to be native landscaping and should not contribute very much flow if any to the proposed development. Reference Figure 2 in Appendix A. Core Requirement 3: Flow Control The site lies within the Level 2 flow control. The site is in the Soos Creek Basin. Runoff from the site will be controlled to meet the required KCSWDM with a detention or infiltration pond. The current preliminary drainage plan shows the detention option and infiltration will be explored once soils information has been obtained. Core Requirement 4: Conveyance System The conveyance system will be sized to convey the 25-year storm event. Conveyance analysis will be provided in the final TIR. The conveyance system will meet all applicable codes. It is anticipated the conveyance system to the east of this property (Soos Creek Plat) will be in place in order to discharge to that system. Reference the attached layout of that plat. The review of the Soos Creek Plat TIR indicates the Yee Short Plat acreage has been included in the up-stream basin area that will contribute runoff to the proposed storm system within the Soos Creek Plat development. Core Requirement 5: Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Runoff from the grading and trenching construction areas will be contained and directed to the proposed sediment trap or pond in accordance with KCSWDM. This site will also be required to install a temporary construction entrance, silt fencing as need to provide adequate Erosion Sediment Control. A separate ESC plan will be prepared for the Construction Document Phase. The ESC plan shall meet all applicable codes. Core Requirement 6: Maintenance and Operation ' ' The Maintenance and operation schedule will be in accordance with KCSWDM. The M&O manual shall meet all applicable codes. Core Requirement 7: Financial Guarantees and Liabilitv Financial guarantees will be required. The King County Bond Quantity worksheet will be provided for public arid private improvements after sufficient city review to establish design specifics. Bond Quantity worksheet will be provided in the Final TIR. 4ofll 12/23/2004 TIR Yee Short Plat Core Requirement 8: Water Quality More than 5,000 square feet of POIS will be added per "new impervious surface" definition on page 1-4 and standard W.Q. exemptions are not applicable and therefore Basic Water Quality Treatment is required for this project. A Stormwater Management catch basin filtration devise is proposed to meet these requirements. Special Requirement # 1: Other adopted area-specific requirements. None. Special Requirement #2: Floodp/ain/Floodway delineation The project does not contain nor is adjacent to a significant stream, lake, or closed depression. Therefore, this requirement does apply to the site. Special Requirement #3: Flood Protection Facilities The project contains no significant streams nor flood protection facilities. Therefore, this requirement does not apply to the site. Special Requirement #4: Source Controls The site is not a commercial, industrial or multifamily project. Therefore, this requirement does not apply to the site. SECTION 3. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS Off-Site Downstream drainage analysis was performed during the preliminary design phase of the project and is attached to the Appendix. The previous visual reconnaissance of the downstream system revealed no indications of scour, flooding, plugged culverts, overtopping or general drainage problems. County Staff has supplied us with drainage complaints for the downstream area. These areas were investigated and found that the proposed development should not contribute ·to and increase any existing drainage problems. SECTION 4, FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 5 of II 12/23/2004 TIR Yee Short Plat Existing(Pre-developed} Site Hydrology: The following table lists the existing site conditions used in the modeling software KCRTS. SeaTac Scale factor 1.0 D escnption s· 1te Forest 1.205. Grass 0.0 Wetland 0.0 . Imt,etvious 0.0 'total Area I.205 Proposed (Developed) Site Hydrology: The following table lists the proposed site conditions used in the modeling software KCRTS. SeaTac Scale factor 1.0 D escnption s· 1te Forest 0.0 Grass 0.236 Wetland 0.0 Imoervious 0.969 Total Area 1.205 It was assumed 80% of the proposed lots would be covered with impervious surface. Performance Standards: The site lies with in a Level 2 Flow Control area per KCSWDM. The proposed detention vault was designed to detain the release no more than Y. the 2-year and 50-year stonn events. The 100-year stonn will be by-passed through the riser orifice. Flow Control System: The infiltration pond was sized using the KCRTS computer model. The following table summarizes 6 of II 12/23/2004 tll{ Yee Short Plat the sizing requirements for infiltration. Distance from No Right of way improvements are anticipated as part of this project. Water Quality System: The site lies with the Basic Water Quality Control area per KCSWDM. Runoff for the developed site will be treated by a Stonnwater Management water quality vaults prior to stonnwater entering the detention vault prior to proceeding downstream. SECTIONS. CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Conveyance calculations will be provided in the final TIR. SECTION 6. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES 1. Geotechnical Report (to be included in the Final TIR) 2. Wetland Study (to be included in the Final TIR) SECTION 7. OTHER PERMITS SECTIONS. ESC ANALYSIS AMD DESIGN Erosion Control Designs (ESC) has been prepared per the King County Standards, since the new site impervious area exceeds 5,000 sf. The plan, together with the grading/drainage plan, shows all existing and proposed topographic features, ESC notes, ESC details and drainage features. 7 of II 12/23/2004 tm. Yee Short Plat Erosion:Colttroleleinents shall consist of a Clearing and Grading Limits, rock construction entrance, intetceptorswales; silt-fencmfrand-use of the a sediment trap as-an erosion· control pond. These calculations will be prepared for the Final TIR. SECTION 9. BOND QUANTITY, FACILITY SUMMARIES, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT Bond quantity, Facility-summaries, and declaration of covenant-will ·all be part of the Final TIR. SECTION 19. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL Operation and Maintenance manual will be part of the Final TIR. 8 of 11 12/23/2004 Renton, Washirig-ron, United States f!.\"\\\ _.I··,_·'~-.---~·::~ ~tt" Ske"'..-'_. . ! thi; Boei.Lg '. •·••··• .'.r .: ) ~9;_~~~.~ J~:i~/1~81 .. i / ,d· 'Jr d ' -3.: fl y}:vt•A.>s. . . -·~ - ~] -ii~~ ~-t: ·,E: ,,_ . ~, !..:..J -~~: i'~~~:.i,..~, 11\! ... GTON "" .. ,, ' . 1 ,_:169_ -~ § • 1 ~ ~ ~~~·~X~R~d~,~~l •• / :j . ~ \ ., ->· ~ .c \(t~ ~ ' ·~ '--~, 1 .!i1''· f":':'1\: '; ·.J » -f ,,1 ., ~ ;;......JJ \~ \.J l'' ' ""\f uF" "?ID "' .. , I· \ -. ' Omi 2 3 14 IV "' ;_ " \" ,! ,'-..._ 4 Copyright O 1988-2003 Miaosoft Corp. and/or its suppliers. All rights 1'8S8J\19d. htJf)Jlwww.microSOft.com/'screett C Copyright 2002 by Geographic Data Technology, lne. All rights reserved. C 2002 Navigation Technoklgie1. AU rights reserved. This data lnductes information taken with permission from Canadian authorities O 1991-2002 Government at Csnada (Statistics Canada and/or Geomatics Canada), au rights reseNed. ""' 5 0 Grass Lined 0 Tank Channel X Vault X Pipe System D Energy Dissapator 0 Open Channel X Wetland 0 Ory Pond 0 Stream 0 Wet Pond Brief Description of System Operation Infiltration 0 Depression 0 Flow Dispersal 0 Waiver 0 Regional Detention Method of Analysis KCRTS Level 2 - Compensation/Mitigali on of Eliminated Site Storage Site runoff directed to catch basins connecting to a detention pond. System sized to handle the SO year storm event to prevent damage to the proposed structures. Outfall will be attached to the proposed development to the east. If Conveyance system is not available prior to construction this project will infiltrate its storm runoff. Facility Related Site Limitations Reference Facility . Limitation "':";,:. ,-;':>:} ;·,~·:.;:.i;·,;; ... ;\::::'·,._;\::::;,;, ·,'--__ . '.' ,·, :· . ; . . It~~t~}\\~J;~UST;V~L!.A_NALYSIS . . • X Cast in Place Vault D Retaining Wall D Rockery > 4' High D Structural on Steep Slope D Other . -i>art12 :EAseij'¢Nt~!J~cts· ··: .,. ·_._ { X Drainage Easement X Access Easement D Native Growth Protection Easement 0 Tract D Other . P~rt 13 ·. SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER :.":-, .. ,". , I or a civil engineer under my supervision my supervision have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accuJa«ie-... King County lartrnent ofDevelopment and Environmental Services TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Project Owner Fanny Yee 12040 SE 19th PL King County, Washington Project Engineer Todd Popelka, P.E. TLP Pacific, LLC 17624. NE 30th Place Redmond Washin on 98052 ',l;'iili:t 3 :;;:t;Yf/.E::()f;'PE:RJ~IT(' ,: , ·. ;APPCICATION':C· .. ;-;,,:,_;: .-: · : ··: · D Subdivison X Short Subdivision D Grading D Commercial Community Renton, King County Drainage Basin Soos Creek 0 River 0 Stream __________ _ 0 Critical Stream Reach D Depressions/Swales D Lake __________ _ Steep Slopes ________ _ Project Name Yee Short Plat King County Location Township 23 North Range 5 East .......... Section ·sw 33 !PatF'..t' ofHeRREV1ews~_NDP1:R'~rrs,: _· > .... D DFW HPA D Shoreline Management D COE 404 D Rockery D DOE Dam Safety X Structural Vaults D FEMA Floodplain D Other 0 COE Wetlands '. ._,'_,. D Floodplain X Wetlands D Seeps/Springs D High Groundwater Table D Groundwater Recharge D Other ·,r' ... ,, ... ;, . Soil Type AgB Slopes 0-6% X Additional Sheets Attached Reference . Geotechnical Report D D D D D REFERENCE X Additional Sheets Attached MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION X Sedimentation Facilities X Stabilized Construction Entrance X Perimeter Runoff Control X Clearing and Grading Restrictions X Cover Practices X Construction Sequence D Other Erosion Potential Erosive Velcoties LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT Steep Slopes. _________ _ MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS AFTER CONSTRUCTION X Stabilize Exposed Surface X Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities X Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris X Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities D Flag Limits of SAO and open space preservation areas · D Other ® King County mm ¥146144¥ l(I Selected Patt:els '-· CotJnty Boundary Sltt!ets ;; H--/\/ .... ,., Fott>st PIOduclion District Boundary ,., AgrietJlluml P<O<lu<:tiOn Ol!ilri<:I Boundary ,llf lMlan Gmwth Area Line D Lakes and Latge RNeta ,t./ Streams ~ -sho<>ITlibe EE Klng CotJnty ""'1<ld properlle!s D Pamals ZOnlng labels Legend Zornng [j§fj A-10, ~.o,e DU~ fOID'C!S • A,3S.~ .. M:1:0Ups3Sa:nn • F·Fcrc!IC llil!l " . """" AA2.5, Rd ~cn,00 Pl" 5a:7CS f-~~) AA,5, R,...,.~crieOtJ OS" SIS:R!l$ ~ RA-TO• Rtnf Arm, c:re DU per 10i!r'7e5 UR. Urbli Resi:nc.cn,OU IJl5" 5 r.res R,f.~,cw-,0Ul)!ra7e R,,4,~.40Upet"l00 ['''.~.~) AA,,~.60\lP!!l"a:nt id R,a.~.souc:a-iae fill:IJ R,12 • --... 1200,..""' ml} A,f8.fusds1ill!l:,t80UJIIS"a:re n R,24,~.2400J)!s'a::nt ~ R,48.~,'*IBOUP!l'a:2'0 • NB, N~&ditle:n i-, MiMiiY,M Ill ce. Ccrnnrtm,&.zsitms ~ RB,_...._ BJ 0, °""' If rtJ 1 • huwi~ ~ ""' ,t./ ToPo Contours (5ft) m lnoorporated Alea :·:::::\,'._ •. ·'.·,. :,: . ~ . ;~60 , I :c· . . . >. I http://wwwS.metrokc.gov/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=overview&Clie ... 10/5/2004 j LEVEL 1 DRAINAGE ANALYSIS Parcel number 619000126 Parcel number 619000127 A part or NORHTWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NUMBER 5 King County, WA PREPARED FOR · Fanny Yee C/0 Laug Associates, Inc. 10658 Riviera Place NE Seattle, WA 98125 EXPIRES 1/25/05 · September 30, 2004 By TLP Pacific, LLC . 17624 NE 301b Place Redmond, Washington 98052 TLP Job No. 0407 • PROJECT OVERVIEW The Proposed Development consists of short platting the current property into multiple individual residential lots. Impervious surfaces will include access road, driveways, houses, patios and walkways. · PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY The existing parcels consist of a total of 0.96 acres of undeveloped land with vegetation ranging from trees, brush and grasses. The site slopes from west to east at approximately 3%. The site access will be provided via 120th Avenue SE. No further road improvements are assumed warranted by this . . project accept pavement restoration from utility tie in connections. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS (DOWNSTREAM -UPSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS) UPSTREAM DRAINAGE The proposed development should not receive any upstream drainage since the surrounding properties consists of residential lots with significant landscaping to act as a buffer for any concentrated stromwater runoff. UPSTREAM DRAINAGE Downstream drainage currently sheet flows across heavily wooded land consisting of approximately a 3% slope for approximately 300 feet then sheet flowing across heayily wooded land consisting of approximately a 16% slope for approximately 650 feet before reaching Soos Creek. At this time their are no drainage complaints on record with the County that the proposed development will contribute storm water runoff to. PROPOSEDDRAINAGEDIMPROVEMENTS The site is in located within the Soos Creek drainage basin. All proposed improvements are anticipated to infiltrate all impervious surface runoff using the King County Small Siie Drainage Requirements. It is anticipated the existing flow durations for the proposed storm events will rang from the 2 year thru the SO-year event. It is anticipated the stonnwater runoff from the . proposed development will be infiltrated or released downstream at a rate current to existing conditions. The property to the east is into the County for review under Application/Permit L04P0002 and will consist of a residential subdivision with storm sewer conveyance pipes and a regional detention pond. The proposed Yee development will make every feasible attempt to coordinate the design and tie into this system if possible. ® King County IIIElmlll m Wl4fli34M IMAP -Stonnwater (.131J[.I 0320 036!) SE·192ND·ST ~ Legend Selected Parcals Shaets. Thomas Brothers Map Page ~ tlig'M.I)" I!,. SWS Drainage Studies "'°'"' liiil S\IYS Neighborhood Drainage ; ,•, .. / = PrajBds D Paa ts 0 SWS Rsgi:mal S1ofTT1W"d1er Contours· 100 ft Facilities. Conlours -20 fl. 0 SWS Resd1;tnlial SlontM'aler 0 Lakes and Large Rive,s Facililies ,,/ Stlaams © SVVS Commett;ial SlolTTTl\-ater m WLRD Drainage Complaints Facilities ·-County Boundary , _. . Comments 111 "\,, 6() I e ;;;;;,w e'9673S 9054 me lnfonnatton Included on this map has been compiled by Klng Counly slafl from a varfety of soun:es and Is subject to change without notice. king Counly makes no n,p,esen1atlons or warranties, express or Implied, as to acauacy, completeness, timenness, or rlgh1s to the use of such Information. Klng County sllaD l10I be liable for any geneml, special, Indirect, lncldental, or consequential damages Including, but not Dmlled to, lost ravenues or lost profits msulllng from the use or misuse of the Information contained on this map. />Jry sale of this map or lnfonnatlon on ~Is ~•• Is orohlbiled ex.....,'"' wrfttan -lsslon of Kinn Cou"'". King County I GIS Center I News I Services I Comments I Search By visiting this and other King Counly web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. http://wwwS.metrokc.gov/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=overview&Clie... 9/29/2004 Basie: Soos Creek OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE SURFACE WATER lDESIGN MANuAL, CORE REQUIREMENT #2 Subbasin Name: Subbasin Number: f \f rt J?l Ir~1ir1JJ1:: -· · · ;iffj~i':\ ,,~,o-~-:;itti~:::t :};;_~~t;~.;:::.· :~-1~r;~,;t·\·;: i:\1t~fiil~1L e,c:·-map. ·;' · ', ,Tw,r.•sbeet flow .swale;· . .' drainage .basln;Nagetstlon;' • · • · · ., .. ·,.-constrk:tJons,' under.capacilyil)l)ndir,gg· ,. •:· tributary. aiea/' likellhood:of,prilbleni;: • . . . ,. •· ' •,:slJe~c'chaniiei,\i,ipe, 'cover, depth, type of sensitive . . OV9r!O!)plng, floo<!ing; habitat of organ~: ·. oveit!ow'pattiways;CpoteniJaj fmJ;ac,- ~~U~ ~~; aiea, volume · • • • . .:'!:i~:~!::~~i~"r~~> · · · '· · · · · · : ,<··. A I Sheet Flow I Heavy Vegetation I 3 I 300 ft I None visible I None proposed B I Sheet Flow I Heavy Vegetation I 16 j 650 ft I None visible I None proposed C I· Soos Creek I Drainage way I ! 370 ft I None visible I None proposed . 98-4\inB04 · lillll atr labirlllJll lnlll&M ....... 811111 8IID1llfl l;/OIA '9ve 5£ q.t-Eli·---Prin1d : 11/3W2004 2:.22:1111 PM S'E 190-lh Sf _., TVlle TJil8 lfl'l'IIIIIIB At1i'811Df PJulllmil Oi Ill llltll lftl'lllli --1975-0078 C . FLOG RD WV/F\.t)'D/112TH AVE SE/SE 188TH ST 888E2 1977.()072 C FLDG 12202 SE 19aNDST seeF2 19711.()080 C PO!fOING 19248 12tSTPLSE EAST OF BENSON HWY 686F2 . 1978-00St C DRNG 19248 f21STPLSE 886F2 . 1979-0047 C 11403 SE204Tt1ST SOIL lilULLDOZEOIPANTiiER LK AREA 8861:2 1"2·0539 C FlOG 12600 SE f92NDST EAST KM AAl:A 86Bl'2 1984-03!3 R . FI.DG tS2liO SE192NOST TO ROADS DIVA 686F2 1984-1!314 C FI.DG 13250 SE192N0ST SE 192ND ST/134TH AVE SE 886F2 19116-1188 C FLOG 11202 SE 196TH ST STOFW OVERFLOW 886E2 · 198'M185 C Fl.00 11202 SE 188Tli ST SEE: 86-1188 BRYANT, BILL · 88SE2 1988·1190 C FI.DG 11001 SE 188THST BASEMENT GETTING WATER 688E2 I· 1987--o334 C Dl'ING 11202 SE 186THS'!' CULVERTS BLOCKED 88·1166.1165 688E2 19a7~71 C FI.DG 11202 SE 188THST SPRING GI.EN 86-1168.11115 68BE2 1987~6 C DRNG 18827 109TiiAVE SE fNADEClllATE SYSTEM B88E2 1987-1049 C TO RD COORD 04/?:T/87. 8&6F2 1988•0238 C FLOG 18431 120THAVE' SE NEW DRIIIEWAVWIU.ITFl.000 6881'2 1988~ £f1 PIPE 18431 120THAVE SE NEED EXTENSION OF 42' CULVERT 88&1'2 1989-0003 C DANG 18612 120THAVE SE INCREASED RUNOFF/CHANNEL 686F2 1989-0192 C DRNG 181112 120THAVE SE X PIPE NOT WOflKJNG B88F2 ,~o C ORNG 186a1 111TH PL SE S/W DANG AND DAMAGE easea 1eee-o100 X DRNG 18831 111THPL SE WATER ON SIDEWAI.Kl89'<16SO AIITON aaaa )990-Q075 C DANG 11264 SE 1B8THST PLUGGED CULVERT/STORM 688E2 1990-0141 C FLOG 18400 112TKAVI: SE PONO OVEflFLOW/90'4149,285,3721STOR 688&2 1880-0149 c. FLDG 11202 SE 186TH ST 1W POND OVERFLOW/ROBERTI STORM 8B8E2 1980-0231 C DFING 18425 112THAVE SE ·RID POND OVERFLOWISTORM 90-274,S? 686E2 1980-0236 C FI.DG 11202 se 1118TKST WATER INBASEMENTISTOFIM/90-141,149, 686E2 1980-0274 C FUlG 11022 SE 114THPL RID POND FLOOOEDISTORM 8B8E2 1990-0842 C FlDG 11202. SE 188THST . RID POND/ROBERTI STORM EVENT 6$6il! 1990-0372 )( DRNG 11202 SE 1811TNST RIO PONDS OVERFLOW9/90-141,149,l!3S,2 888E2 19SD-0709 CL FLOG 18S04 112THAVE SE 0Lf1~59 SEE CL01$224 OUe OECEMBE 68BEl! 188().()1184 C ORNG 18427 112THAVE SE AID PONO DRAINAGE/STOflM 886E2 1990·1081 CL FLOG 11202 SE 18BTHST Cll/13224 SEE CUl12959 GARAGE FLOO 688E2 1990-1188 CL FLOG 11044 SE 186THST MEMOIRUDDELLS STUDY TO PA 688E2 1980-1212 C DtrCH 11044 SE 186TH ST RD/SIDE OITCtl-FU.U9o-1188 888E2 1990-1212 e FILUDIT 11044 SE 186THST WILL START WORK Oll/20 CHK ON Oer.t0/9 686E2 1990-1212 ER FIUJOIT 11044 SE l&eTHSt RUDEU.S ST\JDY 8B8E2 1990-1226 C DANG 18815 107THAVE SE FLOODED BASEMENT/BAD ROADWAY 88&E2 Pao•, ora ::' "'° l'n!laf PiU!liil -.. DfflllltliiJ f\'jl@gnpQtll 1111'111 Pqu 1990-1445 C DANG 18427 · 112THAVE SE RIO POND OVERFLOWING TO STUDYl!IM 88E2 1990·1ll30 SR FUlG 18427 112THAVE SE STORM EVENT 8881:2 1980-1591 SR FLOG 18427 112THA\/E SE STORM EVENT NOT NDAP 6881:2 199Nl150 C DANG 18824 112THAVE SE 8881:2 1991-01BO SR DRNG 18824 112THAVE SE NOTNDAP -E2 1991-11198 C FLbG 18425 112THAV& se B86E2 1991-<1196 SR FI.DG 18425 112THAVE SE NOTNOAP 888E2 1891-0253 C DANG 11264 SE 188TH ST 686E2 1991-()438 S1 $PK TO FINISM S1 3/4 • S2 TO '!12 CON 886E2 1991-o867 CL DRNG 18427 112THAVE SE SEE 91-o4311 Sl!E RUDOS.LS 698E2 1891-0SST C DAMAGECB 19001 118THAVE SE C/B.BEL.OW GRADE 8861;2 1991-1085 C Fl.DG. 11200 SE 188THST RUDDELL POND OVERFLOW 886£2 1991-1132 C DRAINAGE 19008 118THA\/E SE INFO TO PM&D 68BE2 1991-1148 X FI..DGRID 11200 SE 184TH ST CCFII SWM-1031 FIii> PONO CAPICffY 886E2 1994-8038 C PONDING 114SO SE 192NDST POSSGRADING/FllUNGVIOLAllON 6881!2 1998-o&OS C DRNG 19400 120THAVE SE DFWNGE FLOW QUESTION DEVEi.DP INF Q6E2 1988·1850 C DRNG 18121 f2'1THA\/E SE PLUGGED 0/W CULVERT IMPACT TO PVT 61161'2 1996•fS64 C DANG 18908 11STHWAY SE PRIVATE PROPERTY IMPACT TO PVT DRN 886E2 1997-1123 C GRADING 18908 113THWAY SE PVT PROP IMPACT NO DRNG INSTALLED 886E2. 1997-1123 R GRADING 18808 11aTHWAY SI: PVT PROP IMPACT NO DRNG INSTALLl:D 886£2 · 1997-1178 C DAAINAGE 1911ll · 121STPL SE INSTALLATK»I OF DflNG IN R1W OLl>/OFF 686F2 · 1097·1179 NOA DRAINAGE 19113 121ST.PL SE INSTALLATION OF DANG IN R/W OLD/OFF 8861'2. 18117-1179 R DRAINAGE 19113 121STPL SE INSTALLATION OF DANG IN A/W OLD/OFF 8861'2 1997·1301 C DRAINAGE 191211 121STPL SE SUBSTANDARD INSTL OF DANG S\'S PVT .61161'2 ··~9 C DRAINAGE 19016 116TH AV!: SE NEW GRAVEL RD POSSIBLE PVT PROP WI 886E2 J,998.Q068 C DRAINAGE 18820 118THAVE SE SFR CONST IMPACTING ADJACEJ\IT PROP 686£2 18118·0928 C DRAINAGE · 19193 121STPL SE APPARENT OBSTRUCTION IN ROAD DRN 6881'2 1899-0306 C DRAINAGE. 11618 se 188TH ST ADJACEJ\IT PFIOP PAVED 2SOO SQ Fl' 688E2 200CK)388 C DOM. 12626 SE 1112N1> ST flEQUESTTO DIVERT FLOW DISCHARGIN 888F2 2000*72 C DOM ACROS 18029120TH AVE SE APPARENT Flt.LING OF ROADSIDE DITCH. 888E2 .2000-0572 R PDM ACROS 19029120THAV!a SE APPARENT FIi.UNG OF ROADSIDE DITCH. 888E2 2002-o&S3 C OTA 19013 114THCTSE CONCERN REGARDING POSSIBLE SLOUG 68BE2 2003-0546 WOR WQB 18601 126THPLSE 688F2 2003-0762 WOA WOAI 19433 VASHON lf'NY SW BMPS are AU. IN PLACE 686F2 2009-0847 C DDM 192SO 116THAVESE AP PAA ENT OBSTRUCTIOt-l QF OFFSITE C 6BBE2 2003-11847 R DDM 19230 118THAVESE APPARENTOBSmuCTION OF OFFSIT!: C 886E2 2003-o909 WQC WQOR 18601 12GTHPLSE AUTO FLUD RESIDUE ON STREET AS A R 6861'2 ""002 at 2 i@ --- SHORT t-LA T NO. KING COUNTY, WA=SH-IN=GTON~ DEDICATION ~ r..-iY. 'iti REtUdJlR s canllCAlE n. ... ,-d Ulil __ .. ·---"-....... ..... --.. ---ot,.. _ot 1M l'*""1 d M9r. SupL of R-,. ,..-._ APPROVALS: DEPNl1Ma. •SSFSWFNTS i,';';:':""·"-r J?.E. 188th ST ~) FOIi WON. -----·· --- ~ ·-· ....... 20' £ASEMENT FOR ........ ""'51 ... U1'J11ES REC. NO. 8314101 1/ ~I ·r------ Lu (I) ~ § ~, · TRACT 6 ...,.,.. I ! \! NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV. lllll~' l ls+_'"°::.:. 4: PAGE-90 j ii""':···,;;;,;· ,;;;:;,,,;:.,.,.,, .. \ --.............. -~I-----1 '\ I ' ""· .._ ,.,, ...... ' "' ~ 1114 l\'!'"'T' '-,---Ii.......,.. jw 'ir "" .. !nE" Iii l'OltR P(l[ B.Ff'. 505.27 FCUC> 1111"55 IISK --Ill COfrlC., • Co\S1INC '""" llna»l40 ....... • / I l ___ _ S.E. 192nd ST. LAND SURIIEYOR'S CERTIACA TE lla Sbcrt Plat CCSNdly ~ 0 llllrW)' ffiOOt by m. or i.iw my dhdlorl h can~ wtth UMII ~.,u ot tbt ~ State onc1 County Stotut• ond Clrdlnanc. h Augu1t, 2004. Dot. E:. Oc:ik• ,._...__._ MA •o•- I I -....... I LEGEND ~ """PO.£ • -• um VAL\£ .Q Fl!E H11lRANT Ii "'"' IVER ...... • t.lCNJMEHT AS ocsauetll 0 REBAR ANO r.N> • Frull U\O' UARK£R *" e """"' "" llllllillll """ , .. ~4%.t,,;) OX1G -OIMI ta FOa: -·-·-·-· -roa: --mmruca: SADLER/ ®BARNARD & As:s'OC. INC. 12714 VAi.LET A\OU: t --M""' (2ffl a.-112 • RECORDING NO. VOL/PAGE SCALE: 1 " .. 50' • i • -tw ® .. r· 11L .... flj j PORTION OF SE 1/4 of SW 1/4, S. JJ T. 23 N .• R. 5 E .• W.M. ~ NORTH /~ LECAL DESCRIPTION TRACT 6. NORlHWEStERN CAROEN TRACTS, Dl\1StON NO. &, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT lHERECF, R£COROED IN \Q..UME •7 Of Pl.ATS. PACE 90, IN KING COONTY, WASH~. EXC(PT THE YIEST 343.00 FEET THEREOF. BASIS 0, BEARING NORTH'hESTERN GARDEN lRACTS, Dl\"19~ NO. &, o\CCORDING TO THE PLAT TiiEREOf', RECORDfD IN VOLUME 47 OF Pl.ATS, PAGE 90, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. (Pl.AT) ELEVATION DATUM: NAW 88 ESTABLISHED FROM KING COUNTY OONlROL POINT No. EN,, 3" ERASS DISK SET IN A CCIMOIElE MON. l.OCAlED AT THE INiERSECllON Of' S.E. Hl2nd ST. ANO 120th A\C. S.C. El.EVATI~ 494.70 ""' .. SET lARaE SPIKE IN S.E. EDGE Of POll£A Pa.£. lOCA 1[D ON EAST SIDE «" 1:zou.t AVE. S.E. AND 1HE tlmNTIOH <, lH£ SOUTH UNt Of THE STE. El.EVA TION 00,.27 fanny Yee [,"'.::' J .,,.._ ...... • ......... ....... I ~ Lang Aaaoclates, Inc. 1085e Rhlwo PL N.E. s.aw, Waahngtoft. 91125 Dfal. BY .. ,. T.W.K. .-11fn/2D05 00<0.,BY D.E.O. SCALE 9-1,-cu ,. -50' JCS NO. 2004HJ SHUT I -· . ' t J / ·-...-·· I J , ·l_ f'" I ,r \ •• ' I 1 S89'5-4'26"E 612.39' \ A17 ------J,[)4 D5. . . \---\A16 \ . , uruilo ·rr I 30 34 35 36 ,~ \ \ . to,_,1998 s~ FEET 28 29 I ,.,., £J,o ,..., , \ \ \ r 2o 21 ""' -....,. ,, ' · r.a:u --,, .... I "2 999 6 Ol I 1 ''\, w.lch '~ 25 " 37 : I ·l:. A14 \ \ (lJJI ,'\ · , s.on I ""' "''0 : I ~ I : .1 \ \ SP~, l«IPA ~. RIIJ J?J.50:t lE JS..'l.60 \ \ I \ \ I 32 I 38 i WI \A13 ...,, 1 ,.... , I 1· : ·998 \ ~ 30· \ \ tll . •·'"\ ;A, ----' 23 ...,, . ,cf ~ I f• ~ I 1":--"' i I z ,r---:,-----_Jt, I .~HED ~.B.R. I . \ ·\ . -----•-I 1·\ . 1:;;: 997-RBC. ...,, I I~ \ I \· SP4 I .~ \ \ \ ·1 ,,~ \ ~12 \\ . . \ \ \ \ ' i '1 f: (Cl _.\ ?J ~ \ 21 ..... 1S ,.,.. 'z I \ \ :J#s\ .f-"' .,, .• 20 ,..,. \\ 1;.:i\ I ·\·~\\ M . \ ~· l 1> = . -~p \ . , fl SHORT PLAT.STRT,f!_ TO Bw £DEB I/ 19 / ~ 11 · Li . · ro COUNTY PDP. RJCHT-\ w,, -, l II --\ ~ A -~.~ . . /~ 7 .a P.18 '<td .J.m : . PfDl!ED 111: 2 ~ I \ \ ~ ~ --k ""··----r@ /_ 17 I \_ ...,... .,. g < s.,11 -' ,.,.. : ; AA.} I 7 \i ,-;"',-: [~-r-----I ... , : ' ~ .A2/ 1:\ \ ~ I HOUSE 11[~ \>,. 'g -----~~-\ \ _j --,: i ,:g ,.f' . ~ I saa·55•.,·c ,.,_,,. \ . \ \k ~ ~ iD I \ \ \ \ I 8 ,,,, ,., ; I AA! "-\ \ \ o I . ~ l::l ·z ~'I-· "-\ f,; <f~\> 18. p'f. 's ·1 ,.,,, ~ I ,, ,~ I ,,.,. A4 I i ,l'" ~ I I ,> \~~ · t Hovse I .. _ \ / . I ,.,,.,--:,,-s"':~(P) -.. -. ;;:c,":v.,uLr sp1 / I • I I .----·-/A2 . ': ---· ,-RJ./289 \ \ \ . I . _LJ_' I. . j_' . .-_____ --',,U. SP2 \ V j ; i N69"-4.0'S{"E 130.62' .. -,: -'. -. {. Ill l_ / . ---...--~ . . -----f-'" • '4', . ,,::__:'j:_'1:_:_.. _______ ~a~ ===t:Ir::,,c:-::.ic::= . :±_ -s. E. 192ND sr--:--::=..,s; __ -,---~------=--=:::----,-' -. --------- -.----·-----~----·-··--------·~-~--------=--···-·--·~=,JI---------· -.--------·---·-!!IQ·"'·--------·--·----·--·-----·--------·-----.. .. .,.,,_________.,._.--~ -·------·- l/:.--0-~"----0----0-----0 GRAPHIC SCALE LOT LAYOUT PLAN EB I I • l I···I }is,+ '"'*'•*f Lt \~1 ·"'•-• · · CCU-,. it• t,.\'t"S {aft!lt) l..,..• • IL \ \ \ ,< foJ&©&DW LnJ · 5£P 1 6 2DD4 KC.· D.D.E.s. /kJJi~W- UJ4 .llRM GAU. EJEFqE ~D/0 1-800-424-5555 Riff fELI) LOCArot or ~ tlJ1JllES • TGJlor Enellllllllfno Co118111tmda 205 fhlil SI. S. P.O. Boa 1717 _ .. ...., td. 425-ltt-HIS · fa 425-lSl-15!1 Pro}ecb 8008a&IC Pt.AT -<--It.a.ea..... . cm Anci:li ,._ IIE ~1:All11S .,,. Delo, nr M ,. 2lt:.)na -Bil ....... -LIii Authorized. Uae: 11b ..,., b lmM ,,, -~-~~D'-=-· .. ,.,.. ..... a. =-~-----""'"""' Sl'laot Title: .,,,.,... Det• PAaNNAR'( LOl'LAYOUT "S1>Ht No: 2 -ol Page I of I Dehkordi, Fereshteh From: Eric LaBrie [eric.labrie@esmcivil.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 11 :24 AM To: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Subject: Yee Short Plat (KCLU# L04S0065) Fereshteh, We recently had a pre-ap for a proposed plat to the east of the Lee short plat (on the west side of SE 120th) and will be proposing access to SE 120 Ave. SE. Kris Langly and Kim Claussen mentioned that this short plat was processing and also proposing access to 1201h. Can you fax (or otherwise send) me a layout of the project so that I can account for the access in the design or variance for our project? Thanks, ERIC.G. LaBRIE, A.I.C.P. Director of Planning eric.labrle@esmcivil.com ESM CONSUL TING ENGINEERS, LLC www.esmclvil.com Federal Way I Bothell I Cle Elum 720 S 348th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 Tel: 253.838.6113 206.491.3415 cell Fax: 253.838.7104 Civil Ennineer!na I Surw~vino I l...and Plannlna I U'rndscaoe Architecture I GIS 01/14/2005 \ .... Yee Short Plat Justification for proposed private street 1. The applicant does not own the 30' access and utility easement of the proposed private street therefore unable to dedicate said easement as public right-of-way. 2. Circulation pattern in the area indicates that the proposed street will not be extended. 3. Tax Parcels potentially served by the proposed private street: Tax Parcel No. 619900-0126 & 0127 619900-0142 619900-0125 Total No. of lots Acreage 0.96 0.58 0.72 4. Other Tax Parcels in the area No. of lots 6 3 4 Max 13 Remarks Subject short plat Small home currently serve by the esmt. Existing home restrict potential use 619900-0141 Existing home restrict potential use; direct access to 120 Ave SE 619900-0120 Not fronting on the proposed street 582064-0186 Currently served by 121 Pl SE, a private street 582064-0210 Currently served by 121 Pl SE, a private street Total number of potential lots could be served by the proposed private street would be 13 within the maximum allowed (16 lots) on a private street. Please see attached aerial photo of the area. K.C. O.~ _..,_ r, • >· (@) l<ing County I IX0rr@ I [ ~ 11 ~ I l@mnidiJ•IE 11 ~ Information Plannin ' ',. ' .61!i'90DOWO '.l ~ OO;!;JI he information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. ing County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such formation. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages Including, but not limited to, st revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the infonnation contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on is ma is rohibited exce t b written ermission of Kin Coun . ~ilJ9~.Q\.1_11b'.1 ~!$_C~nte_r. I ~.8.11!.~. I S_~_ryjce_s I c_g_rm11en.ts_ 1 s~~[C_h By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. ThE!A_e_t_ails, ® King county Department od Development and Environmental services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale AvenueSN Renton, WA 98055-1219 {206) 296-6609.~ ~29fj-J,217r:=, n 1'I f1 r.:"'1 ~ I!:!~ ~ \hg ~ u ~ Lt:; ILJI Li U DEC 2 7 2004 10 Subdivision Density and Dimension Calculations PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION WORKSHEET RELATING TO DENSITY AND DIMENSIONS Worksheet Prepared by: Lang Associates, Inc. Date: 17-Dec-04 Subdivision Name: YEE SHORT PLAT Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Zoning: R-6 I. Site Area (KCC 21A.06.1172l also see (K.C.C. 21A.12.0BOI: 0 squire feet in submerged land -------- 6.00 Units per Acre + ______ __...co_square feet in perimeter right-of-way which will be required to be dedicated (area 30' from center line of road) = O Total ----~--- Calculation _____ 4'-1"',8'-1c,8,_Gross horizontal area of the project site 0 Total submerged lands and rights-of-way ------,,..,-,,-41,818 Site area in square feet -----~--0.96 site area in acre II. Base Density (KCC 21A.12.03D-.040 tables}: 6.00 du/acre -------'=- Ill. Allowable Dwelling Units and Rounding (K.C.C. 21A.12.D70l: 0.96 site area in acres (see section 1.) X 6.00 base density (see section II) = 5.76 allowable dwelling units, rounded to 6 units IV. Required On-site Recreation Space (KCC 21A.14.18Dl: Apartments and townhouses developed at a density greater than eight units per acre, and mixed use must provide recreation space as follows:: 90 square feet X __ proposed number of studio and one bedroom units ·130 square feet X __ proposed number of two bedroom units + 170 square feet x __ proposed number of three or more bedroom units + Recreation space requirement = -------- Reside n ti a I subdivision and townhouses developed at a density of eight units or less per acre: 390 square feet X 6 proposed number of units Mobile home parks shall provide recreational space as follows: 260 square feet X __ proposed number of units V. Net Buildable Area (KCC 21A.06.797l: = = areas within a project site which are required to be dedicated for public --------right -of -way in excess of sixty feet of width. 2,340 + ________ areas required for above ground stormwater control facilities) (\ + O sensitive areas and buffers.to the extent they are required to remain undeveloped@ Page 1 blllb\Uli\!l lrUll..lE. ©(Q)~V ~ t ® King County m ilm.&iildiMW Comments L,4\114,M (® King County Department od Development and Environmental services Land Use sarvk:" Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue&N Renton, WA ~1219 (206) 296-860?~ (~l,~:!l17r=s fl t'\ rt r,::, ~ I~~ ~ ~ Is u '/!} LL:; I u I Li U DEC 2 7 2004 l.!::!J Subdivision Density and Dimension Calculations File Number PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIGNWORKSHEET RELATING TO DENSITY AND DIMENSIONS Worksheet Prepared by: Lang Associates, Inc. Date: 17-Dec-04 -------- Subdivision Name: YEE SHORT PLAT Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Zoning: R-6 I. Site Area (KCC 21A.06.11721 also see /K.C.C. 21A.12.0SO}; _______ o_squire feet in submerged land 6.00 Units per Acre + 0 square feet in perimeter right-of-way which will be required to be dedicated (area 30' from center line of road) = O Total -------- Calculation _____ 4;...;1cc,8:.1;...;8_Gross horizontal area of the project site O Total submerged lands and rights-of-way --------41,818 Site area in square feet ---------,c-=-::--0.96 site area in acre -------- II. Base Density /KCC 21A.12.030-.040 tables): 6.00 du/acre -------- Ill. Allowable Dwelling Units and Rounding /K.C.C. 21A.12.070l: 0.96 site area in acres (see section I.) X 6.00 base density (see section II) = 5.76 allowable dwelling units, rounded to 6 units IV. Required On-site Recreation Space (KCC 21A.14.180): Apartments and townhouses developed at a density greater than eight units per acre, and mixed use must provide recreation space as follows:: 90 square feet X __ proposed number of studio and one bedroom units 130 square feetX __ proposed number of two bedroom units + 170 square feet X __ proposed number of three or more bedroom units + Recreation space requirement =-------- Residential subdivision and townhouses developed at a density of eight units or less per acre: 390 square feet X 6 proposed number of units Mobile home parks shall provide recreational space as follows: 260 square feet X __ proposed number of units V. Net Buildable Area (KCC 21A.06.797l: = = areas within a project site which are required to be dedicated for public --------right-of-way in excess of sixty feet of width. 2,340 + ________ areas required for above ground stormwater control facilities) (\ + O sensitive areas and buffers,-to the extent they are required to remain undeveloped@ Page 1 l\ll~UOO lrUllE C~lll>V 1 i .. + ______ 2"-''-3_4.:...0 area, dicated or reserved as required recreatio ace (See 111) + O regional utility corridors. + O other area to remain undeveloped. = 2,340 Total reduction ------"--- Ca I cu I a ti on 41,818 Site area in square feet -------:-:.,--------=2 c:, 3....:4~0 Total reduction 39,478 net buildable area in square feet 0.91 net buildable area in acres -------- VI. Minimum Urban Residential Density {KCC 21A.12.060l Calculation 6.00 base density in du/ac X 0.91 net buildable area in acres --------= ______ 5;;.;._44.:...X minimum density 85 % set forth in K.C.C. 21A 12 or as adjusted in Section VII = ______ 4"'".;....6_2 minimum dwelling units required VII. Minimum Density Adjustments For Moderate Slopes {K.C.C. 21A.12.087): 41,818 sq-ft O -5% slope increment X 2.5% median slope value= 1,045 ------~-=----------,-+ 0 sq-ft 5-10% slope increment X 7.5% median slope value= _______ _;;_O + O sq-ft 10-15% slope increment X 12.5% median slope value= o --------+ 0 sq-ft 15-20% slope increment X 17.5% median slope value= --------=-0 + O sq-ft 20-25% slope increment X 22.5% median slope value= O --------=-+ o sq-ft 25-30% slope increment X 27.5% median slope value= o -------- + 0 sq-ft 30-35% slope increment X 32.5% median slope value= 0 -------.,---------+ O sq-ft 35-40% slope increment X 37.5% median slope value= -------~O 41,818 Total sq-ft in net buildable area ·otal sq-ft adjusted for slope 1,045 -----------------'-- Calculation 1,045 total sq-ft adjusted for slope divided by 41,818 total sq-ft in net buildable area ------,--~ = 0.025 weighted average slope of net buildable area --------= _______ .:.,.3 % round up Weiahted Averaae Slope of net buildable area of Site Minimum Densitv Factor 0%-less than 5% 85% 5%-less than 15% 83%, less 1.5% for each 1 % of averai:ie slope in excess of 5% 15% -less than 40% 66%, less 2.0% for each 1 % of average slope in excess of 15% 85% adjusted minimum density factor -------- VIII. Maximum Dwelling Units Allowed: 6.00 base density in dwelling units per acre X 150% = --------=-9 maximum density in dwelling units per acre X 0.96 site area in acres= --------8.64 maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density incentives (K.C.C. 21A.34). -------- 6.00 base density in dwelling units per acre X 200% = --------'-'-.,.~ 12 maximum density in dwelling units per acre X 0.96 site area in acres= --------,,.,-11.52 maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density incentives with 100 percent --------affordable units(K.C.C. 21A.34). 6.00 base density in dwelling units per acre X 150% = --------9 maximum density in dwelling units per acre X 0.96 site area in acres= ------,--c,-:-8.64 maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density transfer (K.C.C. 21A.36 or 21A.55). Calculation + + 5.76 base allowable dwelling units calculated in Section Ill. --------bonus units authorized by K.C.C. 21A.34 transfer units authorized by K.C.C. 21A.36 or 21A.55 5.76 total dwelling units (cannot exceed maximum calculated above) -------- IX. Minimum Lot Area For Construction: Acknowledged Page 2 @ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services OAK-DE-0100 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 <CPJLN/CCm -.,, \ u I.•/ '4-J'";t-• ·l V, p lvl u:; "' :.:: 28 ),-\,) 2c r;'\ ---- r&'!~~)f'{J!_:. I'll~ ~ . ~ ,c1, g' f '=·' r~ 1...-;· __ :- .r-. 2( z·-3:'.. r.,9 z ,, -,c:, J:>C"n :---.,.:::::: rn --::._,'-.., <,C· ,_,,--- 0 (.,'l L ,;...o .-.. -:_ .:-.-'.'! "' :JI: ';;) -c:, r,: CJ "3,&f".J.'S'S.ai-\. "?.. \. "'3 11.1 .. 1 .. 1. 11, .. , I, I, ,1,1 .... 11 .. I ,l, 1111/,/111,1 .. 1,1,,,, l,II , V ·~r AOA Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC PO Box 578 Carnation, WA 98014 Office ( 425) 333-4535 Fax (425) 333-4509 Environmental December 22, 2004 Fanny Yee c/o Lang Associates, Inc. 10658 Riviera Place NE Seattle, WA 98125 Attn: De-En Lang SUBJECT: Wetland Delineation for Yee Property, King County (Parcel #s 61990000126 and -0127) Dear De-En: Planning & Landscape Architecture AOA-1984 On May 19, 2004 I conducted a wetland reconnaissance on the 0.96-acre subject property located east of 1201h Ave. SE in the vicinity of SE 1901h Street in King County, WA. The site is undeveloped and consists primarily of an upland deciduous forest. Topography on the site gnerally slopes gently down from west to east. One small wetland (Wetland A) was identified along the eastern property boundary (Figure 1) and was delineated utilizing the methodology outlined in the 1997 Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Wetland A consists of a small (175 s.f. on-site) isolated shallow topographic depression that extends slightly off-site to the east. Vegetation within the on-site portion of the wetland was generally sparse and consisted primarily of one small black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) and one small Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia). The remainder of the wetland consisted of surface stained duff, indicating early seasonal ponding. Hydrology within the wetland was assumed during the field investigations based on the presence of hydric soils. /J}) Attachment A contains data sheets prepared for a representative location in '2,61h' thf (!.: le>/! upland and wetland. These data sheets document the vegetation, soils, and l.f ,._ I.I; [Jf k hydrology information that aided in the wetland boundary determination. !Jc.c 2;, !!;&'' k <Oo4 U1 Wetland A has been determined to be unregulated by King County as part of their ·C: D.o ,._ review of the project site to the east (King County #L04P002). As delineated by H & S ·c..s. 0 . Consulting and described in their Wetland Evaluation and Delineation Report ( dated \ May 26, 2004), the total wetland area is well below the 2,500 s.f. threshold size for isolated wetlands within the urban area. Under the current King County code, isolated ~ 1L (Q) 4b § ([J) (0) ~ ~ ©~~'1 l}.\l - •. ., 20' EASEMEtfT FOO INGRESS. ECRESS, At,,1,0· UTIUTIES !3EC: NO. 6394101 ( ,EE,Mt)J'/F.P) ACT s34J.oo' . ·-/ ,rtDEN TRACTS DIV . • PAGE 90 j R---+- LEGENC ?0\'£1l PCl I:' Botl.AAll F H..... I ' -· ;_·,··.-·,.·,· .. ,, .. ·.·1,: ......... ,.,. 173 ~ Ft. 1?-( 6199000220 RS-8-50 ' '. De-En Lang December 22, 2004 Page 2 wetlands within the urban growth area are not subject to the County's critical areas ordinance. If you have any questions regarding the wetland delineation, please give me a call. Sincerely, :~~LC Ecologist attachment ' . ATTACHMENT A DATA SHEETS B-2 ...... --........ ____ ........ -·--·----·----, -·--·---7'~-~.~~.::._";,)~t\ . -tr~{:'' DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD1 Field lnvestigai,>r(s): AvrM A..Ji--1 · . Date: ___.:5"=,..--_1_c.:.,, .. _o_'f,__ __ _ ProjecVSne: '4:-IC::. · State: 1,JA-County: --'~c_,..:1 iJ=(;,"-· ____ _ Applicant/Owner: \..t>-,.Jb Plant Community #/Name: ___________ _ Note: tt a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back al data form or a field notebook. --------------------------------------------------- Do normal enVironmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes ~No __ (If no, explain on back) Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes __ No~ (II yes, explain on back) --------------------------------------------------- Dominant Plant Species ~: i~;;~:"t,<C~~~~-.:;,, 3. --,---------- 4. ----------- 5. ---------- 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. VEGETATION Indicator Status Stratum (A(vl .- f-"' c.. ::r: Dominant Plant Species 11. ---------- 12. ---------- 13. ---------- 14. ----------- 15. ---------- 16. ----------- 17. ---------~ 18. ----------- 19. ---------~ 20.---------- Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC _ _,l..,O"--"t'-0:...'u><----- Indicator S1atus S1ratum ls the hydrophytic vegetation crnerion met? Yes .lS._ No __ Rationale:---~--------------'------------------- '? S:o 0 ,:. fAc.. Cl-vlE.:s:fc,0 SOILS Series/phase: -----------------Subgroup:2 ------------- Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes __ No__ Undetermined------- Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No£_ Histic epipedon present? Yes __ No .JS_ Is the soil: Mottled? Yesl-Y-No __ Gleyed? Yes__ No L_ Matrix Color: 1 01' (l. 3 _"2.-Motlle Colors: _,v"-"A!.!/l.="~'·::<.J.22.· ___________ _ Other hydric soil indicators:------------------------------ Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes .....k..._ No Rationale:------------------------------------CHtt-~""-A O (# L.. v-1,11-1 ;"'ICT'f'-€::5 HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No~ Surface water depth: ----------- Is the soil saturated? Yes__ No 15._ Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:---------------------- List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes~ No __ Rationale:~--------~------~-=--------.,---------&/Lfp.,cc. s-;-p.1 ,..,,-1(:, --(:v \l')f:,.J(f-Gf-.>f;,,\S"o;-,A<.. p.,,D,,,_,G JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Yes ..x_ No Rationale for'jurisdictional decision: Au... 3 c..f'. IT r>(l.tto, ,__,~,- 1 This data form can be used tor the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the ,Plant,Commun~y Assessment Procedure. 2 Classffication according to 'Soil Taxonomy." ; ~· 8-2 . ----·-----···:-..:!'.'".Y";.·::.-::.:.~.-• .:, ;, .... ,-~-:7:--··. --··--.. ~-,.; ____ •. . -----·.----. . .• " . • --, ~...c..,- 1 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD1 Field lnvest>;iatpJ{s): JL T•'-\AoJ,.j Date: 5 -1',-c Y ProjecVSne: Ll:.i; · State: vJA County: --'-"'-....,_1.,_i-!~0~,~----- Applicant/Owner: Ll\.J Plant Community #/Name:------------ NotB: H a more detail&d site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook. Do normal enVironmental conditions exist at the p!ant communrty? Yes _:j_ No __ (If no, explain on back) Has the ve,getation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes __ No~ (II yes, explain on back) VEGETATION Indicator Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species 1. P..\r,vS r .J br.,; fAC.. T 11. 2. Ci::\¥\v~. ~o,",.r\-5 'fALU s 12. 3. i..il..s t)·, Cc(:lc. r {Ac.U 2 13. 4. :l.\ <~ h r,J '-s: 14. 5. ~ ( ~[ C :Yt· ~·l"c:. ..\-.JV--f;.C. -+ 15. 6. 1~\:,ts.\-;.,_1,.....,,-VV'V"1\..,""' ·t~,v 16. 7. f;: ~-.a vrs, ... v ~ f~(~ V 17. 8. 1P t(;, A l.r-;r ... r ........ v;!.=:, f ,,.c ,J ,1 18. 9. 19. 10. 20. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC ·"' 13 '7c Indicator Status Stratum Is the hydrophytic vegetation crnerion mat? Yes __ No ..2S,._ Rationals:---------------~--------------------tic. j "> S~ C,·~, '("A '-G (t vV ~ ""f ·f { fl- SOILS Series/phase: -----------------Subgroup:2 ------------- Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined------- Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No~ Histic epipedon present? Yes __ No _x..._ Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No){___ Gleyed? Yes__ No _;is._ Matrix Color: \o'1 /1-7.../~ Mottle Colors: ----------------- Other hydric soil indicators:------------------------------ Is the hydric soil criterion mat? Yes No.£_ Rationale: :---:--....,.---;;--.,.----------:=------------------C tl? d,._ o<\ ol'-'l W,f<Js·CI ""•-><'-~S: HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Yes__ No L_ Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Yes__ No ..1::.._ Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:---------------------- List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes__ No~ Rationals:-,,--...,-----,----~-----:,---~~------~----=---:---:,.,.--- /vG t>i?,SC:i2v.,.,.,,.,,..> o(L f-.111);:,-,c\<. o,:.. .fo<<.. SA""(l.-A"•·..l 6~ i'<>r<'D, ,J<:, JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant ccmmunity a walland? Yes__ No L_ Rationale for"jurisdictional decision: tl9 C.P-,-tt('-1,.,. ME.,- t. This data form can ba used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the .Plant Community Assessment Procadura. · - 2 Classffication according to "Soil Taxonomy." C &&~ . 'Consulting WIElrlLANID IEVAILlUJA lr~ON AND IDIEIL~NIEA lr~ON IRIEPOIRlr SOOS CREEK PLAT PROJECT SITE King County, Waslhington Section 33, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. prepared for Boston Design and Development 13425 E. Lk. Kathleen Dr. SE Renton, WA 98059 prepared by H & S Consulting P. 0. Box: 731695 Puyallup, WA 98373 253 732-6515 mheckert@qwestnet May 26, 2004 St ,,,,....wv "'" 1'6 ·I V • P. 0. Box 731695 • Puyallup WA 98373 lo)~©~GW~@) ln} SEP 1 6 2004 K.C. 0.0.E.S. Lffi<~ . (253) 732-6515 mheckert@qwest.net (360) 893-6779 EXECUTIVE SUiYililflARY The Soos Creek Plat Project Site is approximately 7.26 acres in total size and located to the east of the · City of Renton, King County, Washington. The project site is comprised of three parcels; ( Parcel # 6199000220, 6199000240, 6199000260). The project site is dominated by mature and sub-mature forest, with single-family residences, managed and maintained lawns, and unmanaged portions. Onsite assessment of the project site following the procedures outlined in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. (Wash. Manual) and the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987 Manual) resulted in the identification of two areas that exhibited hydric soils, wetland hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation consistent with the established criteria of both the Wash. and 1987 Manuals. This assessment, completed in accordance with King County regulations, included an evaluation of the function and value rating for the identified wetlands, a classification of the wetland following the U.S. Fish and Wildlife methods, and an identification of the standard King County buffer width required for these wetlands. · WETLAND SIZE CLASSIFICATION KING FUNCTION STANDARD ONSITE (USFWS) COUNTY AND VALUE BUFFER WIDTH (square RATING RATING feet) A Offsite -PFOE 1 High 100 ft. Buffer onsite B *998 PSSC 3 non-Low Not regulated reaulated *connotes wetland continues off-site PFOE palustrine, emergent, seasonally flooded PSSC palustrine, shrub-scrub, seasonally flooded/saturated . The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and King County, as well as a number of other local, state, and federal agencies, regulate activities in and around identified wetland and drainage corridor areas. Such regulations focus on the avoidance of adverse impacts to wetlands, streams, associated buffers and the mitigation of such impacts that cannot be avoided. King County has established criteria to categorize wetlands for purposes of regulation and the establishment of buffers. In addition, King County allows a limited amount of alterations to wetlands (i.e. isolated wetlands, roadway crossings) provided such impacts are mitigated pursuant to an approved mitigation plan. The Selected Action Plari of the Soos Creek Plat project site focuses on the creation of independent lots suitable for the development of single-family homesites consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan. . . I I ·, ' PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT Parcel number 6199000126 Parcel number 6199000127 A part of NORHTWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVISION NUMBER 5 King County, WA PREPARED FOR Fanny Yee.C/0 Lang Associates, Inc. 1(1\ /(l\ 10658 Riviera Place NE L ILJ) 4 § ILJ) (0 6 ~ Seattle, WA 98125 cu' December 27, 2004 Revised 12/28/05 Prepared tor and on behalf of TLP Pacific, LLC 17624 NE 30th Place Redmond, Washington 98052 K.C. D.D.E.S. TIR Yee Short Plat Section I. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Appendices A. B. C. D. TABLE OF CONTENTS Description Page Number Project Overview Conditions and Requirements Summary Off-site Analysis 3 3-5 5 Flow Control and Water Quality Facility ~alysis and Design 6 Conveyance Systems An_alysis and Design 7 Special Reports and Studies 7 Other Permits 7 ESC Analysis and Design 7 Bond Quantity, Facility Summaries, Declaration of Covenant 8 Operations and Maintenance Manual 8 Figures: I. TIR Worksheet 2. Site Location 3. Drainage Basins & Sub-basins Off-site Analysis Drainage System Table & Map Drainage Complaint Analysis Letter of Intent (Drainage Easement Soos Creek Plat) 2 of 13 12/28/2005 TIR Yee Short Plat SECTION 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW The proposed development consists of the subdivision of 6 residential lots and an associated private road to service those lots form two existing 0.48 acre lots. The project is also proposing a recreation area in the southeasterly portion of the site. Impervious surfaces will include the residential house roofs, driveways, walkways and the associated private road to access the property for I 20th Ave. SE. The proposed short plat will also require the installation of utilities to support the proposed residential development. SECTION 2. CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY The existing lots combined are 0.96 acres of R6-SO zoned properties that is IJildeveloped. The majority of the site is undeveloped with vegetation ranging from native trees to brush and grasses. Existing Grades slope from the west to the east approximately 4.0%. The site currently sheet flows to the east to a non-regulated wetland depression that will be filled as part of the proposed development. Site access is provided via 120th Ave. A private road will be required to access the proposed 6 lots from 120th Ave. SE which is classified as a neighborhood collector. This section of the T1R is intended to meet the agency specific requirements for a report addressing all Core and Special Requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Manual. Core Requirement 1. Discharge at the Natural Location The site currently drains from the west to the east portion of the site. The site is currently heavily vegetated and any substantial flow across the site appears to sheet flow from west to east. From evaluation of the survey it appears off site drainage form the north could be conveyed to the existing non regulated wetland on the easterly boundary of the site. This drainage path will be maintained. The existing discharge poirit for this site is along the east boundary line. The proposed development to the east (Soos Creek Plat) has included this area as described above in its calculations for infiltration. This proposed project will detain all proposed impervious surfaces with an underground detention vault. This vault will discharge to a proposed conveyance system to the east and connect into the Soos Creek Plat conveyance system. The discharge location is approximately 60 feet to the south of the existing wetland depression that will be filled. The natural flow is to the east and moving that discharge point to the south by 60 feet does not warrant a SWDM 3 of 13 12/28/2005 • TIR Yee Short Plat Adjustment request. The natural flow path to the east is still maintained to the outfall of Soos Creek. Core Requirement 2. Offsite Analysis A level one downstream analysis has been prepared and is provided in Appendix B ofthis TIR. The upstream analysis investigation reveals approximately 3 acres of property will release stormwater in the direction of the proposed property. Storm runoff will be generated from residential roofs, drives and landscaped areas. Arial topography revealed the majority ofthis area to be native landscaping and should not contribute very much flow if any to the proposed development. Reference Figure 2 in Appendix A. Core Requirement 3: Flow Control The site lies within the Level 2 flow control. The site is in the Soos Creek Basin. Runoff from the site will be controlled to meet the required KCSWDM with a detention or infiltration pond. The current preliminary drainage plan shows the detention option and infiltration will be explored once soils information has been obtained. Core Requirement 4: Conveyance System The conveyance system will be sized to convey the 25-year storm event. Conveyance analysis will be provided in the final TIR. The conveyance system will meet all applicable codes. It is anticipated the conveyance system to the east ofthis property (Soos Creek Plat) will be in place in order to discharge to that system. Reference the attached layout of that plat. The review of the Soos Creek Plat TIR indicates the Yee Short Plat acrerage has been included in the up-stream basin area that will contribute runoff to the proposed storm system within the Soos Creek Plat development. Core Requirement 5: Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Runoff from the grading and trenching construction areas will be contained and directed to the proposed sediment trap or pond in accordance with KCSWDM. This site will also be required to install a temporary construction entrance, silt fencing as need to provide adequate Erosion Sediment Control. A separate ESC plan will be prepared for the Construction Document Phase. The ESC plan shall meet all applicable codes. Core Requirement 6: Maintenance and Operation 4 of 13 12/28/2005 TIR Yee Short Plat The Maintenance and operation schedule will be in accordance with KCSWDM. The M&O manual shall meet all applicable codes. Core Requirement 7: Financial Guarantees and Liability Financial guarantees will be required. The King County Bond Quantity worksheet will be provided for public and private improvements after sufficient city review to establish design specifics. Bond Quantity worksheet will be provided in the Final TIR. Core Requirement 8: Water Quality More than 5,000 square feet of PGIS will be added per "new impervious surface" definition on page 1-4 ahd standard W.Q. exemptions are not applicable and therefore Basic Water Quality Treatment is required for this project. A Stormwater Management 54" vault filtration devise is proposed to meet these requirements. Special Requirement # 1: Other adopted area-specific requirements. None. Special Requirement #2: Floodplain/Floodway delineation The project does not contain nor is adjacent to a significant stream, lake, or closed depression. Therefore, this requirement does apply to the site. Special Requirement #3: Flood Protection Facilities The project contains no significant streams nor flood protection facilities. Therefore, this requirement does not apply to the site. Special Requirement #4: Source Controls The site is not a commercial, industrial nor multifamily project. Therefore, this requirement does not apply to the site. SECTION 3. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS Off-Site Downstream drainage analysis was performed during the preliminary design phase of the 5 of 13 12/28/2005 TIR Yee Short Plat project and is attached in the Appendix. The previous visual reconnaissance of the downstream system revealed no indications of scour, flooding, plugged culverts, overtopping or general drainage problems. County Staff has supplied us with drainage complaints for the downstream area. These areas were investigated and found that the proposed development should not contribute to and increase any existing drainage problems. SECTION 4. FLOWCONTROLANDWATERQUALITYFACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Existing (Pre-developed) Site Hydrology: The following table lists the existing site conditions used in the modeling software KCRTS. SeaTac Scale factor 1.0 D escnol!on s· 1te Forest 1.205 Grass 0.0 Wetland 0.0 Impervious 0.0 Total Area 1.205 Proposed (Developed) Site Hydrology: The following table lists the proposed site conditions used in the modeling software KCRTS. SeaTac Scale factor 1.0 Descriotion Site Forest 0.0 Grass 0.236 Wetland 0.0 Imoervious 0.969 Total Area 1.205 It was assumed 80% of the proposed lots would be covered with impervious surface. Performance Standards: 6 of 13 12/28/2005 TIR Yee Short Plat The site lies with in a Level 2 Flow Control area per KCSWDM. The proposed detention vault was designed to detain the release no more than Y, the 2-year and SO-year storm events. The I 00-year storm will be by-passed through the riser orifice. Flow Control System: The infiltration pond was sized using the KCRTS computer model. The following table summarizes the sizing requirements for infiltration. Pond 18,344 cf 8.5 ft 61 ft 35 ft Distance from line 5 feet min. No Right of way improvements are anticipated as part of this project. Water Quality Systfm: The site lies with the Basic Water Quality Control area per KCSWDM. Runoff for the developed site will be treated by a Stormwater Management water quality vaults prior to stormwater entering the detention vault prior to proceeding downstream. SECTIONS. CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Conveyance calculations will be provided in the final TIR. SECTION 6. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES I. Wetland Study (to be included in the Final TIR) SECTION 7. OTHER PERMITS 7 of 13 12/28/2005 TIR Yee Short Plat SECTION 8. ESC ANALYSIS AMD DESIGN Erosion Control Designs (ESC) has been prepared per the King County Standards, since the new site impervious area exceeds 5,000 sf. The plan, together with the grading/drainage plan, shows all existing and proposed topographic features, ESC notes, ESC details and drainage features. Erosion Control elements shall consist of a Clearing and Grading Limits, rock construction entrance, interceptor swales, silt fencing and use of the a sediment trap as an erosion control pond. These calculations will be prepared for the Final TIR. SECTION 9. BOND QUANTITY, FACILITY SUMMARIES, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT Bond quantity, Facility summaries, and declaration of covenant will all be part of the Final TIR. SECTION 10. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL Operation and Maintenance manual will be part of the Final TIR. 8 of13 12/28/2005 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PROJECT ENGINEER Project Owner Fanny Yee 12040 SE 19th PL King County, Washington Project Engineer Todd Popelka, P.E. TLP Pacific, LLC 17624 NE 30th Place Redmond Washin..ton 98052 Part 3 TYPE. OF PERMIT APPllCATION · .. • D Subdivison X Short Subdivision D Grading D Commercial Part 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Project Name Yee Short Plat King County Location Township 23 North Range 5 East .......... Section SW 33 Part4 OTHER REVIEWS AND PERMITS ... . D DFW HPA D Shoreline Management D COE 404 D Rockery D DOE Dam Safety X Structural Vaults D FEMA Floodplain D Other D COE Wetlands Part 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN Community Renton, King County Drainage Basin Soos Creek Part 6 . SITE· CHARACTERIS:rlCS D River D Stream D Critical Stream Reach D Depressions/Swales D Lake Steep Slopes . . D Floodplain X Wetlands D Seeps/Springs D High Groundwater Table D Groundwater Recharge D Other Part7 SOILS Soil Type AgB Slopes 0-6% X Additional Sheets Attached Reference Geotechnical Report Part 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS D D D D D REFERENCE X Additional Sheets Attached Part 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION X Sedimentation Facilities X Stabilized Construction Entrance X Perimeter Runoff Control X Clearing and Grading· Restrictions X Cover Practices X Construction Sequence D Other Erosion Potential Erosive Velcoties LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT Steep Slopes _________ _ MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS AFTER CONSTRUCTION X Stabilize Exposed Surface X Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities X Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris X Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities D Flag Limits of SAO and open space preservation areas D Other Part 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM D Grass Lined D Tank Channel X Vault X Pipe System D Energy Dissapator D Open Channel X Wetland D Dry Pond D Stream D Wet Pond Brief Description of System Operation D D D D Infiltration Depression Flow Dispersal Waiver Regional Detention Method of Analysis KCRTS Level 2 Compensation/Mitigati on of Eliminated Site Storage Site runoff directed to catch basins connecting to a detention pond. System sized to handle the 50 year storm event to prevent damage to the proposed structures. Outfall will be attached to the proposed development to the east. If Conveyance system is not available prior to construction this project will infiHrate its storm runoff. Facility Related Site Limitations Reference Facility Limitation STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS . EASEMENTS/TRACTS Part 11 Part 12 ·. -' ' . . X Cast in Place Vault X Drainage Easement D X Access Easement Retaining Wall D D Native Growth Protection Easement Rockery > 4' High D Structural on Steep Slope D Tract D Other D Other Part 13 SIGNATURE OFPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I or a civil engineer under my supervision my supervision have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of · my knowledge the information provided here is accu1La1E1,--.,. Renton, Washington, United States , ___ _ --1. __ ~ -o WAS '--,: ti f j ---~~'l.,. /~::,-·· ~-:-- INGTON y\if d -ikV:~:-~tiof~J.at1£~. ' .... ;?;J:·1-'"°'.;~<"'~~ r------',·. c,; { -_, ;99 ('',/ ake_.:) ' ( The Boe_ ~tg 'i ComP:8-.J. 212th St ; / 181 -- "-{516 -~ "Keni\. \ <J .c ·-. ~ ! ' r-.. \ Copyright C 1988-2003 Microsoft Corp. end/or its suppliers. All rights reserved. http:l!www.miaosoft.com/streets p n \,.}. :'----, C'}. l 1 ',~ •--' \- .,, >-I .c 15• " ~- t._J Omi '-, l j '.::! ... --~~- ?°'?£:tc. (;?~~ ~;~•'4.'Jf6bl '·, ~S:'.~;I .-,'-~. Y~g1igs'3°·"'·~ ~A~\j{7 tp.l ''{? :4th J,? w <n Covijlgton 2 ' \~ c-~-· . .a,...l ,.. __ :'' ' ' \~ ,) ~I 1 .c co, "'' V' ~ i n n 3 4 C Copyright 2002 by Geographic Data Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. C 2002 Navigation Technologies. All rtghts reserved. This data lnclud8s information taken with permission from Canadian authorities c 1991-2002 Government of Canada (Statistics Canada and/or Geomatics Canada), all rights reserved. 5 1v.1.up vu1.pu1. rage; i u1 ~ @ King County llllm'ffia ~14%?M P4fU34W iMAP -Propert Information f Planninn\ ,_ ,-~~~1.~,,::,..,.--!0'.'=20!'..,..-~/s~....;6!1!.J9~90000~\._", \ 111 I I \ \ 1 \ . i ·s,~o I/ w . !: ·j,~ -y:. l"r r~ I''/ . f199000120 I ~I .. _,. , / "-;7 .~.. 1 , ) J •· '\ I .6199000,., 611100001,2 •199ot1.86 . 6199000210 : ~=±:::;--:-. _:_. rt-~· ·-1-l :JJ I ( 1 ; "I-J j l \ ' }. ' \ 61990001r A Selected Parcels '-· County Boundary Streets ~ tt;,,,.ar ....... /v' """ ,., Fottlst Production District Boundary ,_, Agricuftural Production Oistrict Boundary ~ lkban Growth Area Une D Lakes and Large Rivers /v' Streams ~ Muddeshoot Tribe 111 King County owned properties D Parcels Zoning LabelS 6199000,.s ~: 619900 1 o,o, .. · \ \ \ I 1 ;· .. ·-~ E C-C6199000200-\ O\·· ... ·:_ \_\ \L '_:.1~531i. / r··••-1 i__J ~ Legend Zoning A· 10, Agio.ftrd .me OU p:s-10m:ns A,35• AgloJU-d,O'JDOU pt," lSa::ves F · rae:.1 l\f•MIO!!l'"a AA 2.5• RU'd fnD. °"OU ?'I' 51!1:l'e RA-5. RU"d l«Ja,O'le 00 p,-5m:l'ea RA, 10, RU!a: .lln:slii, cne DU""° 10.i!il's UR, Urttt1R~.o,cD0 ~ 5a71!!5 R, 1 . Residni~, oneOO pcr ~ R«f., Rc2o:b'oa .• 40U per IX7c R,6, Re,;iastJ.1.60U per m:ce l' ·· ·1 R,a. Rc:s1o:b'Da.aoopcr~ l::_J R,12·~.1200pcr3:.7e ~ R,1a. Residi:nld, ,aou Pl5" a:Te mQ1I R·:24• Amid:!r0.1,240\J pcric,,e llll,iiJ t:J R,48,A~,480Upcra:ro ~ NB·--- 0 CB, Canmu-i~ ~ ~ RB-Ac:g:cnt~ i::;i O ' ""= [.11 1.~ 0 ""' /v' Tope contours (5ft) m Incorporated Alea ! ' http://wwwS.metrokc.gov/~rvlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=overview&Clie ... 10/5/2004 Soil Survey of King County Area, w,•,in_,gton"---------------- King County Area, Washington Map Unit Symbol USDA Nataual R~ C:ct::J Consmatlon MtTlce Map Unit Name . Map Unit Legend Summary Acres in AO! Web Soil Survey 1.0 National Cooperative Soil Survey Percent of AO! Yee Plat 12/28/2005 Page 3 of3 Map vurpm !'age 1 or 1 @) King County lllll:lmll!ll llllmllll 41§&11449 •3,jj,!111§,jijj h i4ii3,4 IMAP -Sensitive Areas 6198400203 I 6198400201 8198,00205 61!;\84'Dt:i220 6198,UJ0'202 6199000020 6199000023 6199000012 619!/000080 6198400204 61984'00222 619840020£) 8198400245 6191W00:?60 n-------------'lll 6198.C002SO ~· <· :r! ..,. 11-------------lla;l' 6198400300 8198(.00320 · 61984003<1 ('98<003<0 (CJ~Kirlil~ P-Selected Pan:-.els '-· County Boundary X Mountain Peaks Streets ~ H- """''" l\/ -D Parcels SAO Stream # c,-, 1-, -I 619!)000024 S19!W00025 6199000026 619!)000021 61990000<0 619900004'1 6199000120 61900DD12S 6199000059 & 6190000121 6199000126 619900014'1 61!i'l900D14'2 619000018B 619g(JO(J210 619!W0014,0 619900014'3 6190000185 6199000205 f----'---~1---lll' f-----1 ..i 61P9D00200 "-':'---~.L. 61E"°1 "' ~6199000183 '1 6199000215 S19PD(J(J182 r99000180I I 0 r6'"i160 6199000161 I I Legend Ctass2Pscm:3 Class 2 ~mend C~3 Unc:tmsiicid 0 Lake& and Unga Rivers ~ Sl1'1ams ffl SAO W..lland IBiJ SAO Land•lide ~ SAO SeiSmic: SAO Erosion Landslide Hazard Drainage Area he lnfonnation Included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. ng County makes no representations or warranties, express or Implied, as to acanacy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such nfonnation. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, Indirect, Incidental, or consequential damages lndudlng, but not limited to, st revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the Information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or Information On Is ma is rohiblted exce b written ennlsslon of Kln Coun . King County I GIS Center I News I ~ I Comments I ~arch By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by tenns and conditions of the site. The details. http://wwwS.metrokc.gov/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=overview&Cl... 12/28/2005 Pondcalc Worksheet lnst,;uctions: . . . . . · 1 Enier site information inJhe yellow highlighted cells' 2 Verify no error-messi!ge is displayed . . 3 Results are displayed_ iii Green Box "Note: pondcalc.will.not,WOII( for negtiilveiandcover conversions. pondcalc does riot handle existing Elpr TG very welt [)lsclalmer: This spl'l)adsheet ls_ pl'C)Vlded .Without wattantf Ofaily·l<lnd. Use this spreadsheet af.vour .. own-risk. AIUaclllty sizes shoultU>il verified using KCRT$ software. . Rainfall Region ST {either ST or LA see rainfall regions map} Scale Factor: 1.00 { 0.8 -1.2 see rainfall regions map} FC Level: : { 1, 2, or 3 see flow control app map} Predeveloped landcover Postdeveloped Adjusted Acres Error Messages acres type converted cover 1.205 TF 1.205 0 TP 0 TG 0.236 El 0.969 Acreage Check: post pre gross 1.205 1.205 adjusted 1.205 1.205 .. P'loir f'reqwmcy halyaia: Ti-5Brimr-File:pralev. tsf Project Icce.tion:SctQ-foc. -1.mwal P-1r. Fla. Ratas----Flov F~ .lllalyai- Flow. Rate .... Ti:-of P9Dk --Pt.lb, --.... ... ~ "'°" '"''" lCiS) Pel-i.cd 0>.020 ' 2/0, ... 01 2.: 00 O·. UO 1 100.00 0. ,,o. 0.018 • 1/05 ... 02 16; 00 0 .030 2 2S.OO 0. %0 0:.025 3 12,'08','02 18: 110 0. 025 3 10.110 o. goo 0.021 ' a ... 26.,0, 2: 00 0 .025 • 5.00 0. 900 0. 025 • 10/29"°' 16: 00 0 .022 5 3.00 0. 667 O·. 022. 5 l/19 .... 06 16: 110 0 .021 ' 2.00 0. 500 0.1130 2 10 .... 21; .... 06 0:00 0 .020 ' 1.30 0. 231 0. O,tO 1 l/09/09 6: 110 0 .0111 ' 1.10 0.091 Caoou ......... 0.037 50 .OD 0. 980 Fla. Frequency halysi.s Ti-Sad-File:doT.taf Project Lccotion:Soa-Tac -.bnual Paek Flow Rat------Flow Frequency Analysis-- Flos R4tet """" Tiae of Pu.k --Peab--.... Rehri. """ (CFS) (CFS) Period Q .242 ' 2/09 ... 01 2: 00 0 .475 1 100.00 0.990 0.20? • l/05/02 16 :00 0. 3&2 2 2S.OO 0.960 lt.UO 3 2/27/03 7: 00 0 .290 3 10·.00 0. 900 0.2"2 ' 8/26/H 2: 00 0. 287 • 5.00 o. 900 0. 28? • 10/211/0, 16: 00 0.252 5 3. 00 0. 667 Q:.2S2 5 l/19/06 16: 00 0·.2"2 ' 2 .00 0.500 ll.3S2 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.2'2 ' 1.30 0. 2ll 0:475 1 1/09/08 r.: 00 0'.207 1".10 0. 091 Coap!Ated Peaks o.u, SD .00 0. 980 T!R Yee Short Plat APPENDIXB OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE TABLE 10 of 13 12/28/2005 LEVEL 1 DRAINAGE ANALYSIS Parcel number 619000126 Parcel number 619000127 A part or NORHTWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DMSION NUMBERS King County, WA PREPARED FOR Fanny Yee C/0 Lang Associates, Inc. 10658 Riviera Place NE Seattle, WA 98125 EXPIRES 1/25/05 September 30, 2004 By TLP Pacific, LLC 17624 NE 301b Place Redmond, Washington 98052 TLP Job No. 0407 PROJECT OVERVIEW The Proposed Development consists of short platting the current property into multiple individual residential lots. Impervious surfaces will include access road, driveways, houses, patios and walkways. PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY The existing parcels consist of a total of 0.96 acres of undeveloped land with vegetation ranging from trees, brush and grasses. The site slopes from west to east at approximately 3%. The site access will be provided via 1201h Avenue SE. No further road improvements are assumed warranted by this project accept pavement restoration from utility tie in connections. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS (DOWNSTREAM -UPSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS) UPSTREAM DRAINAGE The proposed development should not receive any upstream drainage since the surrounding properties consists of residential lots with significant landscaping to act as a buffer for any concentrated stromwater runoff. UPSTREAM DRAINAGE Downstream drainage currently sheet flows across heavily wooded land consisting of approximately a 3% slope for approximately 300 feet then sheet flowing across heavily wooded land consisting of approximately a 16% slope for approximately 650 feet before reaching Soos Creek. At this time their are no drainage complaints on record with the County that the proposed development will contribute storm water runoff to. PROPOSEDDRAINAGEDIMPROVEMENTS The site is in located within the Soos Creek drainage basin. All proposed improvements are anticipated to infiltrate all impervious surface runoff using the King County Small Site Drainage Requirements. It is anticipated the existing flow durations for the proposed storm events will rang from the 2 year thru the SO-year event. It is anticipated the storm water runoff from the proposed development will be infiltrated or released downstream at a rate current to existing conditions. The property to the east is into the County for review under Application/Permit L04P0002 and will consist of a residential subdivision with storm sewer conveyance pipes and a regional detention pond. The proposed Yee development will make every feasible attempt to coordinate the design and tie into this system if possible. Map Uutput !'age 1 or 1 @) King County ~ 11U1a111 CiAttiii\\--1 ••·i11\11iA1ih H1¥ilibW 0161 01fi3 -'-- a D b. [] 0 0 0 ·-, _. I f.1360 -s.J,b92ND·SJ 0320 0016 0015 Selected Parcels Thomas Brolhers "-'lap Page sws Drainage Studies SVJS Neighborhood Drainage Projects SWS RegDnal Stomwater Facilities SWS Residential StoTlTM"dler Facilities SINS Comme1eial SlotTTM'il1et Facilities County Boundary iMAP -Stonnwater Legend 111 "'-' so' Slteels #. !i,g'rA,1)" I" A11,-1.,:s -'·/ = D Parcels Contours -100 fl Conlours -20 rt. D Lakes and Large RMJis ,v Streams ~ WLRD Drainage Complaints g!96735 e Information lnduded on this map has been compiled by King Coumy staff from a variety of soon:es and Is subject to change without nollte. g Coumy makes no representations or wanantles, express or Implied, as to acauacy, completeness, timeliness, or rlgh1s to the usa of such formation. King County shaO not be Hable for any general, special, Indirect, lncfdenlal, or consequantfal damages Including, but not limited to, revenues o, lost profi1s resulting from the use o, misuse of the information conlained on this map. /vry sale of this map o, Information on Is ma Is lbOed ex t written n of Kl Coun • Kl!.1Q__Qounty I GIS Center I New~ I Services I Comments J Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by tenns and conditions of the site. The de,aHs. http://wwwS.metrokc.gov/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=overview&Clie ... 9/29/2004 Basin: Soos Creek Symbol Drainage Component Type, Name, and Size see map · Type: sheet flow, swate, stream, channel,· pipe, pond; Size: dlametar, surface area · A Sheet Flow B Sheet Flow C Soos Creek 98-41inB04 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM 'f ABLE SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANuAL, CORE REQUIREMENT #2 Subbasin Name: Subbasin Number: · . · · Drainage.·· . Slope . Dlstanc~ · Eidiltlh ·· . · Potential · Observations of field .... ,. g Compon~nt frc,m site Problems Problems lns~or, 1'8source Desci'lritlon dlscharae .. . . ' . . -. ·, . -. reviewer. or resident drainage basin, vegetation, · % 14 ml= 1,320 ft. constrlct1ons, under capacity, ponding, lnbutary area, likelihood of problem, cover, depth, type of sensitive . overtopplng, flooding, habitat or organism overflow pathways, potential Impacts area, volume destruction, scouring, bank sloughing, sedimentation. Incision. other erosion Heavy Vegetation 3 300 ft None visible None proposed Heavy Vegetation 16 650 ft None visible None proposed Drainage way 370 ft None visible None proposed • TIR Yee Short Plat APPENDIXC DRAINAGE COMPLAINT ANALYSIS 11 of 13 12/28/2005 TIR Yee Short Plat APPENDIXC DRAINAGE COMPLAINT ANALYSIS n ofll 12/23/2004 • 1,;JOIA l9ve 5£ o/ ilDll _, W8la' 811111.11111 bdiliiil NIIBn • lltallllBB lilll'VlllBII Bml1IDi'I k11"'8Jnti11Bi'll!I Printed : 11 /30l2004 2:22:38 PM SE 190-ln Sf can,,IIIDI l'VIID 1JllD llf Pfildlifl Allll'8U llf PfGMalil llillllll&IIIB JnPap lllllllhi' -1975--0078 C FLOG AD WVIFL0'0/112TH AVE SE/SE 18lll'H ST 6861:2 1977-oo72 C FLDG 12202 SE 1 lr.!ND ST 88SF2 1978-00SO C PONDING 19248 121ST PL SE EAST Of BENSON HWY 688F2 1m-ooa1 C DANG 19248 121STPLSE 686F2 1979-0047 C 11403 SE204111 ST SOIL BULLDOZEDIPANlliER LI< AREA 9861:2 1982-0ffl C Fl.CG 12600 SE 192ND ST EAST l<ENT AAEA 988f2 11184-0313 A FLOG 13260 SE192NOST TO ROADS DIVA 686F2 1984..()314 C FLOG 13260 SE192NDST SE 192ND ST/134TH AVE SE 688Fl! 198&-1188 C FLOG 11202 SE. 186THST STORM OVEAFLOW 886E2 1986•11& C FLOG 11202 SE 188TH ST SEE:86-1168 BRYANT, BILL · 8861:2 1988-1190 C FI.DG 11001 SE 188THST . BASEMENT GETIING WATER 686E2 1987-os34 C DRNG 11202 SE 186Tl1ST CULVERTS BLOCKED 86-1168.1168 688E2 198T-o471 C Ft.DG 11202 SE 188THST SPRING GLEN 86-1166, 1185 68SE2 1987-os45 C DANG 18827 109THAVE SE INADEQUATE SYSTEM 688E2 1987-1049 C TO RD COO RD 04/271'7. 888F2 1988·0238 C F\.DG 18431 120THAVE' SE NEW DRIVEWAYWII.Lrl'FLOOO 6881'2 1988-o238 ER PIPE 18431 120TH AVE SE NEED EXTENSION OF 42' CULVERT 88&F2 1989-0QOS C DANG 18$12 120THAVE SE INCREASED RUNOFF/CHANNEL 68SF2 1989-0192 C DANG 111612 120tliAVE SE X PIPE NOT WOFIJCING 886F2 1989-0SSO C ORN<i 19681 111TH PL SE S/W DRNG ANO DAMAGE • B86E2 1989-0700 X DANG 18631 111THPL SE WATl!R ON SIDEWAU</89'0650 FRITON 8861i:2 1990-0075 C DANG 11264 SE 188TH ST PLUGGED CULVERT/STORM 8881:.2 1980-0141 C FLOG 18400 112THAVE SE POND OVEAFLOW/90-0149.235,372/STOR 686El! 1980-0149 C FLOG 11202 SE 186TH ST RID PONO OVEAFLOWIROBERT/ STORM 886E2 1990-G231 C DANG 18426 112TH AVE SE · A/0 POND OVERFLOW/STORM 90-274,37 686E2 1990-0236 C FLDG 11202 SE 1~ST WATER IN BASEMENTISTOAMIII0-141,149, 886E2 1990-0274 C FLOG 11022 SE 184THPL AID POND FLOOOED/STOAM 888E2 1990-0342 C FLOG 11202. SE 18STHST RIO PONO/ROB~T/ STORM EVENT 686E2 1990-03'72 )( DANG 11202 SE 186THST Fl/0 PONDS OVEAFLOW9/90·141,149.23ll,2 886E2 1990-0709 CL FLOG 18504 1121liAVE SE CL012959 SEE CL013224 DUE DEC£MSE 688El! 1980-o&84 C DANG 18427 112THAVE SE RID POND DRAINAGE/STORM 686£2 1990-1081 CL FLOG 11202 SE 18STHST CUtl 3224 SEE CL/112959 GARAGE FLOO 8861:2 1990-, 186 CL FLOG 11044 SE 188THST MEMO/RUDDElLS STl.lDYTO PA li88E2 1990·1212 C DITCH 11044 SE 186TH ST RO/SIDE OITC~l 188 686E2 1990-1212 E FILUDIT 11044 SE 1B6™ST WILL START WORK Oll/20 CHK ON Oll/30/9 686E2 1990-1212 EA FILLIDIT 11044 SE 188THST AUDELLS STUDY 688E2 1990-1226 C DANG 18615 107THAVE SE FLOODED BASEMENT/BAD ROADWAY 886E2 Peoi,1 ora • e1unp1&1a1 I JypaorNni ;I Df l'Nlblalil l'4tllllil' llmr!Dmlltll 1lil'a PailV 1119(1-1445 C DRNG 18427 112lrlAVE SE RID PONO OVERFLOWING TO STUDY/91·1 8B6E2 I 990·1530 SR FLOG 18427 112THAVE SE STORM EVENT 688E2 1990-1SS1 SA FLOG 18427 112TH AVE SE STORM EVENT NOT NDAP 686E2 f99H>1SO C ORMG 18824 112THAVE SE BBBE2 1981-0180 SR DRNG 18B24 112TH AVE SE NOTNDAP 686E2 1991·0198 C FLOG 18425 112THAVE SE 6861:2 199Hll9fl SR F1.llG Hl425 112THAVE SE MOTNDAI' B86E2 1891-0263 C DANG 11264 SE 188TH ST 6881:2 199H>4ll8 S1 SPK TO FlNISH S1 3/4 • S2 TO '92 CON 886E2 1991-11667 CL DANG 18427 112TH AVE SE SEE 91-0438 SEE RUDDELLS 88BE2 1991-0ffl C OAMAGEC8 19001 118TH AVE SE Cit! BELOW GRADE 686E2 199M0115 C FLOG 11200 SE 188THST RUDDELL POND OVERFLOW 8881:.2 1991-1132 C DRAINAGE 19006 118THAVE se INFOTOPM&D 688E2 1991-1149 X FLDGR/D 11200 SE 184TH ST CCF# SWM-1031 RID PONO CAPICITY 886E2 1894.()038 C PONDING 11450 SE 192MDST POSS GRADING/FILLING VIOLATION 888E2 1998-0805 C DANG 18400 120THAVE SE DRAINGE FLOW QUESTION DEVELOP INF 6116E2 1998·1SSO C DANG 19121 1241'HAVE SE PLUGGED D1W CULVERT IMPACT TO PVT G86F2 19$6·1564 C DANG 18908 113THWAY SE PRIVATEPROPERTYIMPACTTOPVTDRN 886E2 19!1'7-1128 C GRADING 18908 113THWAY SE PVT PROP IMPACT NO DRNG INSTALLED 686E2 1887·1123 R GRADING 18908 113THWAY SE PVT PROP IMPACT NO DANG INSTALLED 88662 1997·1179 C DRAINAGE 19113 121STPL SE INSTAUATION OF DANG IN PIN OLD/OFF 686F2 · 1987·1179 NOA DRAINAGE 19113 121STPL SE INSTAu.ATION OF DRNG IN Rm OLD/OFF 686F2 1997·1179 R DRAINAGE 19113 121STPL SE INSTAI.LATION OF DRNG IN A/VII OLD/OFF 686F2 1997·1301 C DRAINAGE 19125 121STPL SE SUBSTANDARD u,,sn. OF DANG SYS PVT .886F2 1fflH>019 C DRAINAGE 19016 116TH .O.VE SE NSW GRAVEL RD POSSIBLE PVT PROP 1M B86E2 199&0068 C DRAINAGE 18820 116THAVE SE SFR CONST IMPACTING ADJ.O.CENT PROP 6l!SS! 1998·0828 C DRAINAGE 19193 121ST PL SE APPARENT OBSTRUCTION IN ROAD ORN 6881'2 1999-0306 C DRAINAGE 11518 SE 189TH 5T ADJACENT PROP PAVED 2SOO SQ Fr 688E2 2000-Q398 C DOM 12626 SE 192NDST REQUESTlO DIVERT Fl.OW DISCHARGIN 886F2 2000•0572 C DOM ACROS 18029120THAVE SE APPARENT FILLING OF ROADSJOE DITCH. 6811E2 2000-0572 R ODM ACRos · 19029 120TH AVE SE APPARENT FILLING OF ROADSIDE DITCH. 888E2 2002-o&53 C OTA 18013 114TH er SE CONCERN REGARDING POSSIBLE SLOUG 688E2 2003-0545 WOR WQB 18601 126TH PLSE 68111'2 2003-0762 WOA WQAI 19433 VASHON HWY SW BMPS are ALL IN PLACE 886F2 20GS-0847 C DOM 19250 116THAVESE APPARENT OBSTRUCTION QF OFFSITE C 686E2 2003-D847 R DDM 19230 116THAVESE APPARENT OBSTRUCTION OF OFFSITE C G8GE2 2003-D909 WQC WQDR 18601 128THPLSE AUTO FLUID RESIDUE ON STREET AS AR 686F2 Pago2ol 2 • TIR Yee Short Plat APPENDIXD LETTER OF INTENT (SOOS CREEK PLAT) 12 of 13 12/28/2005 • • LETTER OF INTENT June 24,005 Re: Yee Short Plat, L04S0065 To Whom It May Concern: Phjlip M. and Fanny Y. Yee ("Yee"), Husband and wife own the two tax lots 619900-0126 and 619900-0127 known as the Yee Short Plat application. Ritz Trust own Tax Lot 619900-0220 property known as the development of the Fleuve des Voiles (L04P0002), located adjacent and to the east of the Yee property. Ravenna Development. LLC, developer of Fleuve des Voiles (L04P0002) has an open escrow to purchase the Ritz Trust tax lot 619900-0220 and will complete the purchase upon preliminary plat approval of the development of the Fleuve des Voiles (L04P0002). The Soos Creek Water and Sewer District has indicated that the development of the Fleuve des Voiles plat will require a connection to the existing stubbed out water line on the Yee's property. The Yees are desirous of allowing treated storm water to drain through the future Fleuve des Voiles storm system. The Ravenna Development, LLC and the Yees have agreed to execute a Mutual Easement Agreement in the form attached upon the close of escrow to purchase the Ritz Trust tax lot 619900-0220. It is the intention of the Yees and Mr. Charles Spaeth, as Manager of Ravenna Development, LLC to sign the Mutual Easement Agreement in the form attached as soon as Fleuve des Voiles and Yee Short Plat receives preliminary plat approval from King County and the escrow closes on the Ritz Trust tax lot 619900-0220. YEES Ravenna Development, LLC ~4?1?-~·-~>(~A_e<: PhilpM~~ cf CharlesSpaeth, anager ~~~ Fan~ ·- Address: 11431 -2381" Street SW- Edmonds, WA 98020 Address: 6839 Ravenna Ave NE Seattle, WA 98115 Attachment: Mutual Easement Agreement Form for Yees -Ravenna Development, LLC • • ·- AFTER RECORDING PLEASE RETURN To: DE-EN LANG 10658 RIVIERA PLACE NE SEATTLE,VVA 98125 MUTUAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT Properties Parcel "A" Owner(s) The Ritz Trust (Ritz Trust) Tina VValters, Trustee Tax lot 619900-0220 Number(s) Legal NORTHVVESTERN GARDEN Descriptions TRACTS, DIVISION N0.5 LOT 2 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 388021 RECORDING NO 8902210370 SD SHORT PLAT OAF-TRACT 11 OF NORTHVVESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO 5 TGW S 240 FT OF LOT 1 .OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 582064 RECORDING NO 8404200923 TAXABLE PORTION PARTIALLY EXEMPT UNDER RCW 84.36.381 THRU .389 Mutual Easement Page 1 of 5 Rilz Trust -Yee Parcel "B" Philip M. Yee and Fanny Y. Yee 619900-0126 and 619900-0127 TRACT 6, NORTHVVESTERN GARDEN TRACTS, DIVISION NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 47 OF PLAT~, PAGE 90, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 343 FEET THEREOF. • • This Mutual Easement Agreement is made this_ day of April 2005, by and between Tina Walters. Trustee of the Ritz Trust hereinafter tenmed the 'Trustee", and Philip M. Yee and Fanny Y. Yee, hereinafter termed the 'Yee.' Trustee and the Yee are collectively referred to as 'Parties." BACKGROUND 1. Trustee's Property or Parcel 'A' Trustee is the legal owner of the property located at 12208 SE 192nd Street, Renton, Washington, tax lot 619900-0220, legally described as follows: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS, DIVISION N0.5 LOT 2 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 388021 RECORDING NO 8902210370 SD SHORT PLAT DAF -TRACT 11 OF NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO 5 TGW S 240 FT OF LOT 1 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 582064 RECORDING NO 8404200923 2. Yee's Property or Parcel 'B' Yee is the legal owner of the property located at 12040 SE 1901h Place and 12052 SE 1901h Place, Renton, Washington, tax lots 619900-0126 and 619900-0127, legally described as follows: Tract 6, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS, DIVISION NO. 5, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 47 of Plats, page 90, records of King County, Washington; Except the West 343 feet thereof. 3. Water Main Easement Trustee has plan to develop Parcel 'A' and desires to have an easement across the southerly ten feet of Parcel 'B' for the installation and connection of a water main to the water distribution system of Soos Creek Water and Sewer District 4. Drainage Easement Yee desires to develop Parcel 'B' and needs a drainage easement for the installation of a drainage pipe across Parcel "A' for connection to the larger drainage collection system on Parcel 'A'. Mutual Easement Page 2 of 5 Ritz Trust -Yee • ' . AGREEMENT The parties agree as follows: 5. Storm Drainage for Parcel 'B" (a). Trustee agrees to create no less than a ten-foot-wide storm drain easement, or as required by King County (or its successor), in which a storm drainage pipe will be installed to receive direct runoff or runoff from a storm detention system on Parcel 'B" as may be required. . (b). Trustee shall determine the exact location of said storm drain easement which shall run easterly from the eastern boundary of Parcel 'B' to the nearest feasible point of connection to a larger storm drainage system that shall service Parcel 'A." The storm drainage pipe as described in S(a) shall not include any portion that may be used to service any potential or resulting subdivided lot(s) in Parcel 'A.' (c). Trustee will be responsible for the selection and hiring of professionals for the design and construction of the storm drainage pipe described in (Sa), in a manner acceptable to King County (or its successor), as part of the larger drainage system that shall service Parcel 'A.' (d). Yee shall pay for the design, engineering and construction of the storm drainage pipe described in (Sa) direcUy to the engineer, consultant and contractor as itemized bid items and in separate billings. (e). The drainage of Parcel 'B" shall in no way cause Trustee to bear additional costs for engineering, catch basin installation, or for the construction of settlement or detention facilities, etc. as a result of the additional runoff from Parcel 'B.' Yee shall not be responsible for the cost of any portion of the storm drainage system that may benefit Parcel ·A.· 6. Water Main Easement for Parcel 'A" (a). Yee agrees to grant no less than a ten-foot-wide easement to Soos Creek Water and Sewer District for a water main that shall be designed or approved by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District The easement will run from the eastern boundary of Parcel 'A', through an area defined as the southerly thirty (30) feet of Parcel 'B.' (b). The owner of Parcel 'B' agrees to grant no less than a thirty-foot-wide construction easement to accommodate installation of the water main. Mutual Easement Page 3 of 5 Ritz Trust -Yee (c). This water main shall be installed at the sole cost of Trustee. (d). Trustee agrees to restore Parcel 'B' to its original condition before construction. 7. All provisions herein are to be completed within ten years from the date of this agreement. 8. This agreement is made for the mutual benefit of both parties; neither party will receive consideration beyond those described in this Agreement 9. If any suit or action is commenced by either party, or their successors and/or assigns, to enforce any rights under this agreement, in addition to costs provided by statute, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of attorney's fees in such sum as the Court may adjudge just and reasonable. 10. The provisions of this Agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon future owners of Parcel 'A' and Parcel 'B.' according to the terms set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have set our hands and seals this_ day of March 2005. Trustee: nna Walters, · Trustee of the Ritz Trust Mutual Easement Page 4 of 5 Ritz Trust -Yee Yee: PhilipM. Yee FannyY. Yee • • STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING ) ss. On this __ day of April 2005, before me personally appeared PHILIP M. YEE and FANNY Y. YEE, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said Granters, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year above written. STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING ) ss. Print Name: ________ _ NOT ARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington Residing at: My commission expires: _____ _ On this __ · day of April 2005, before me personally appeared Tina Walters, to me known to be the Trustee of the Ritz Trust described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said Grantees, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year above written. . Mutual Easement Page 5of 5 Ritz Trust· Yee Print Name: ________ _ NOT ARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington Residing at: My commission expires: _____ _ , . w (/) @---____ -.E. 188th ST. ~~t FOUND CASE~ MO-~-.~N~ ~Al{K ------------- o_ (USED OFFSETS FOR MON. • POSITION) 20' EASEMENT FOR 0 I 9 (210' INGRESS EGRESS I I :B I I AND UTILITIES ' I I '-'1· I G199000041 REC. NO. 6394101 I 6199000050 I 6199000059 ' _ I RS-6-50 I RS 6-50 ilS-6-50 l(rouND-REBAR u; · ~ "'-/ I , f1 ANDCAP 3, ' NORTH I '--.._ ~ I / ~ LS Ja898 21 i L-:-_ ----·-----------------_ -·-------· ·--------~~-~_9"54'2!" !_ G39.92'--I / -11/ f'J6 N. or ~-1-~E • )) I J43 cc· I 12· DIA r -·~----"" \-' ~-;--DO' ·--, . __ , '-. ---,--.-1 --QH·-----"----T ~ --TRACT 5 . , \ .. ' .•. · _ ) .L \ .: ,/_ STAND~ I _ ~ 286 92' TD4 ~ z· ~ House ~ W/U#///U/~ 6199000080 RS-6-50 •0 //lh1 I I O '." \/QL. 47 PAG~· 90 I RS 6-50 P I ~1990001~6LYTJ I ~ / / O~ ~ 1 1! I 'C: 6199000120 ' •. rW//7,0'///h?,3 f, :'s o. , ·SO f.,_ 19 c,22.. &199000127 n, A. 1111 1 \ l-.q-RS-6-50 11 ~~ \ ;,, lO ' ''\ {S-6-)0 ;}1 M / ··/ I !-ocse -~ \ ;-m LOT 1 I '• / _J ,34 ---.'letland A•0 0 LEGEND " POWER POLE 0 BOLLARD M WAT[R V/,l VE .Q FIRE HYDl~ANT (jij WATER METER Q MAIL BOX j I I -, -----JO' EASEMENT FOR --------t-~-~//A ;; ::=f __j ---~ --__ _ ~.,. I 175 Sq n 1//~! ' 1-= =~:~!~E:~EsiTILITIES----=---=---~ J ___ D,c~../'---1 __ ~tj"'1 __ J _Jo~'-'-'-.~_\_ _/?~ •2 , 1 <O; Ii[ 'fl I ( REC. NO. 7810060608 --~~-J I 1 \ ,, I ~ f) 21. ' . -. LGT~6" 2~ ~ cu l} l.i.J I \ ? /1 -f-P-··;~ <.!J cP I . l :· . '.../f..,:[j st ;'.=I / if m . -:::=.+-_.-/ I -IV j ~ ~. fRE HlD. V, c."·· '-1-' .-.-12" 511,1 111 l.,._ ::.G.::=' -I -\ ' \ ' ,--I I O TO CQCNECT TO 1HE w ~ @ 0 MONUM[NT AS DESCRIBED REBAR AND CAP :::C I 'l-~G . ~~~ 0 FOUND SURVEY MARKER 1--10+00 i ~I · ·., 1 REC. SPACE <XJMYANCE SYSTEM ~ 0 'I 'fF"/ . _ ~ +<1$1~{1 ~72.74 -~ FlR N ~ 1 1 J1m 144.13' J -"\:~ RS-6-50 · ~ o _ -~,;,--•1 -----I ---} . STA: 111+02 "' '>l I! 1~ 0 N 89'59'20" w 6.30.15' 1 ) \. ' I ~ '. ~ -g (3 ~ ~ I b §¥ I :f-? ~I j 2 · 7 'fl \.!·2 _. ,FOUND 2 IRON PIPE ~ J ~,, w I , ' .,,. I / " Shed i!! ; II_, I G -y I I / 11 / 6199000186 -· 1 6199000210 / 30' t.ATER MAIN EASCMENT DECIDUOUS TREi:: ~ ~ ~ IL~) I 0 )?.'"7~1 I / . RS-G-50 ~ / _I RS-6~50 ~/ REC. NO. 7810020168 g ~ ~ 5l l1_/ 2i . \-1 j I 51990()()112 : / t1r11t11 1 \ ~i -~,Tflll711111), d );! ;,; i;:; I ol I j RS-6-50 • 1ffrffl,fom f• I l House //1 a."' fli a ~ zlo , 5199000140 I I 'I//, . I V, 1 111 ~ 1 RS-6-so I I v~, 1 II -I -~-~--=1· I ·I -=1 I .. : ,, :>.' .. ; i CONCRETE -0-0-0-0-CHAIN LINK f~NCE -~-•-•-•-W:RE FENCE -c-11-<:-o-WOOD FENCE INDll10UAL LOT GRADING SHAl.1 REMAIN QOSE TO ElllSTING GRADE IN CllDER " 0 ~=B-t~F ==F=FI I -i_:f __ L __ f- 1, -~-' ST~ :~.~:~ ~.. I . -~ 1 -I I I I · I + ~--ryt --~I ---I -. I ~ . I ""'· """' i I I r= TO PRESERVE THE El11S11NG lREES. • 1 • . ---1 ---~ -l'J , I l I 16.5' 13.5' -· i ~ ----T--_I i ______ J ____ -'1 I -0----,...... -~1_--t----~ . _) __ I ----, :..----1 I ----J I : __ : ~ ______ _l ___ ,ff ,_ I ----I !-_____ , ____ : __________ , ______ 4---------1------i -i , __ I I 4901----------r - I -:, i f Ui. 10' 10' 1.S'Qi.} 2' 1 1 1 1 : ....... LL ; A/C I WALK 2.0X I ~ <laOl---1,--· ' ----t----·--1-------- I __ LE ~~~~TR~: ---/ _ -------I TCNTICN VAlA.T I n• ---: -~----------------L--------~ "'~W I I • ! _, ' ~ ~ i ' -ii ~ ' ! ~ ; I ; if . ! 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 1o+OO 1e+oo - 12" $111 A':P. THICKEN EDGE TO CONNECT TO THE PROPOSm SOOS 01ll1< PL.AT S1tlRM DRAINAGE CXIN',£YNIQ'. """" PRIVATE ROAD "" SCALE: VERT: 1"=5' HOR: 1"=30' U. I§~ ~ ' .. . "' "'" ~~i~ .15"::l ~ cr.:i :g ~gz "".:.i (.) ~ t+=: !; ~ ·-i;; (.) ;:;; -... "'s~~ ~ ~:.r A . a, gJ -"'" ~~n~ E-s :s -·· I I 11! ~ ! _,, z <· (.:, .. vi uJ 0 u uJ I-z ~ <( -z _J • ~ a. ~ 0 I-< .Id a:: u 0 ° lil < ::i::: (/) 0 U') < a:: >-w c., a:: ~ z ~ < < z ...J z ~ § ::; " uJ z a:: 2 a. --~. -. • ,. .. ·:·- ·I'•' ...... ,. ~ A-•• • /£'\" lai'llg Associates, ili"ilc. Land Use and D~velopment ~nsultants 10658 Riviera Place N.E. •Seattle• Washington• 98125 • Tel: (208) 306-8880 • Fax: (206) 362-6848 February 28, 2006 . @ r,:., ff'J "" n ii n ~ ~ . . . u u /£: lg, ~ LJ,, \VI IC I· r Ms. Fereshteh Dehkordi, Senior Planner L ({) 4 § ,1)\ ,1) {(~ I.;: MAR O 1 2006. [ 1 ) King County DDES-LUSD 'VJ \j) IL.» ~ 900 Oaksdale Ave. SW K.C. D.D.E.S . Renton, WA 98055_ Re: Yee Short Plat-Responses to 1/19/06 Notice of Request for Additional Information King County File No. L04S0065 Dear Fereshteh: Hope you had a wonderful holiday and looking forward to an even better new year. We are writing in response to your Notice of Request for Additional Information dated January 19, 2006 regarding the Subject Project. Our responses are enumerated similar to your original letter and are in bold. Original County comments appear in Italics. A .. Road 1. It appears as depicted on the 18vised site plan that the sidewalk and grading associated with the construction of the new road at the intersection of the entrance road with 120th A venue SE, extends beyond the perimeter of the existing road easement. Please provide a letter of intent from the neighbor, tax lot # 6199000125 to allow for additional easement for construction of the road. This letter must be provided prior to the p18liminary approval. The actual easement must be 18COrded prior to the engineering plan approval. The subject intersection has been reconfigured to show all of the new improvements within the eJtlstlng right-of-way or easement 2. As shown the proposed private road accessing the short subdivision does not meet KCRS Section 2,07. The road must contain a vertical curb along its south edge per KCRS Drawing #1-010. Please 18vise the site plan to show this. The proposed road cross section has been revised to meet KCRS. 3. The proposed project is within the designated "urban• al8a. The proposed thickened edge and asphalt shoulder is not permitted for the on.site road per the KCRS, Section 2.03 in urban a19as unless a variance from the standard is obtained. The proposed road cross section has been revised to meet KCRS. 4 The private road as proposed is acceptable however an agf86ment to use tha cul-de-sac bulb by the neighboring property (Tax Lot# 6199000125) will be requil8d. A note to this effactwill be 18COrded on the face of the short plat. Comment acknowledged. B. Drainage 1. The ventilation grates for the underground RID vault cannot be located in the roadway per KCSWDM, Section 5.3.3.1. Please 19vise the RID design to show the grates outside the travel lane. -Ms. Dehko«li February 28, 2006 Page2 of3 The RID vault has been reconfigured and the ventilation grates are no long In the roadway. 2. A 3 to 1 length to width ratio is required for the RID facility. Please demonstrate how this is accomplished. The RID vault has been reconfigured to meet the 3 to 1 ratio requirement 3. The Level 1 (fast page) shows a pipe extending easterly from the RID facility to the street drainage system within the plat of Ffevue Des Voiles, KC Fife L04P0002. This conflicts with the engineering plans for the plat. A conceptual drainage plan is required demonstrating how the two drainage systems will connect. Please coordinate this with the proponent of Ffevue Des Voiles. We have contacted the applicant of Flevue Des Voiles and determine that they are changing their plan to show drainage connection to Yee Short Plat per easement agreement 4. The proposed short plat depends on the completion of Ffevue Des Voiles plat for drainage discharge. The proposed drainage facility along with the discharge pipe crossing the tax parcel to the east must be completed in the event Ftevue Des Voiles plat fails. A fetter of intent from the tax parcel (6199000220) directly east of the site must be provided to allow construction of the discharge pipe. Letters of Intent along with a llllutual Easement Agreement were previously submitted to the County. The agreement has provisions for the construction of the discharge pipe. In the event Flevue Des Voiles falls (which Is unlikely), alternative drainage systems acceptable to the County would be proposed. If no acceptable alternative Is available, it would not be financially feasible for a 6 lot short plat to construct the entire drainage discharge system, then the short plat would not be constructed. Further more property ownership of Flevue Des Voiles Is in the process of changing hands. The new owner, who has been working with us during the entire short plat process, has agreed to sign any necessary document when the transaction Is completed. C. Recreation Plan The conceptual recreation plan does not show the location of water main easement. Please be advised that no anchored or permanent structure can be placed within the water easement without approval from the Water District. A detailed recreation and landscaping plan will be required during engineering review plan. This will be a condition of approval. Comment acknowledged. D. Tree Replacement Please remove the proposed tree replacements from the site plan. A separate tree replacement plan will be required for review and approval during the Engineering Review phase. The tree replacement plan must be prepared showing tree species and other details and must be submitted along the road and drainage plans. This will be a condition of preliminary approval. Comment acknowledged. Other comments 1. Four copies of a conceptual drainage plan showing the items discussed above. This plan must be prepared, stamped, and signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Washington. Four copies of the revised conceptual drainage plan are enclosed. Ms. Dehkordi February 28, 2006 Page3 of3 2. Letters of intent from tax parcels 6199000125 and 6199000220 as discussed above. Please see responses to Item 84. 3. Four copies of a revised site plan to match the revised conceptual drainage plan. Revision to the Conceptual Drainage Plan did not require changes to the site plan. 4. Two copies of a reduced site plan B 1/2 by 14. Revision to the Conceptual Drainage Plan did not require changes to the site plan. If you need the reductions of the previously submitted site plan please let me know. If you have any questions or need any additional infom,ation, please contact me at (206) 306- 8880 or email me at deenlang@yahoo.com. De-n Lang President Enclosure Cc Fanny Yee Todd Popelka Mike Luna . . ® King County DROP-OF~ COVER SHEET FOR LUSD ONLY Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296--6600 TIY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Drop-Off Cover Sheet for Land Use Services Division 00000000000000000 IMPORTANTooooooooooooooooo PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME IS NECESSARY FOR ALL DROP-OFFS Project No L04S0065 =~~~-------------- Project Name YEE SHORT PLAT FROM Lang Associates, Inc. Attn: De-En Lang Company Name / Contact Person Telephone No 206 306-8880 TO Fereshteh Dehkordi Senior Planner DATE RECEIVED BY LUSD K.C. 0.0.E.S. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY KING COUNTY STAFF (please print) Short Plat/ Plats Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Responses to County comments; 4 copies of the revised Conceptual Drainage Plan Lot Line Adjustment Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Right of Way Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Clearing / Grading Permit -Additional information requested. Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Other: ' PLEASE NOTE: All drop-off item(s) will be logged into the computer under the project number, therefore, it is important that the top portion of this form is completed prope~y before you drop-off anything. Assistance in finding a project number can be provided by speaking to a Zoning/Land Use Technician. Your cooperation is important. Thank you. Check out the ODES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Orop-OffCoverSheet-Yee lg-cvs-dropoff. pdf 09/13/2005 Page 1 of 1 i ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 January 19, 2006 De-En Lang Lang Associates Inc. 10658 Riviera Place NE Seattle, WA 98125 RE: Yee Short Plat, KC File L04S0065 Dear Mr. Lang: • Thank you for the submittal of additional information on January 9, 2006. We have reviewed the supplemental information and have the following comments: A. Road I. It appears as depicted on the revised site plan that the sidewalk and grading associated with the construction of the new road at the intersection of the entrance road with 1201h Avenue SE, extends beyond the perimeter of the existing road easement. Please provide a letter of intent from the neighbor, tax lot# 6199000125 to allow for additional easement for construction of the road. This letter must be provided prior to the preliminary approval. The actual easement must be recorded prior to the engineering plan approval. 2. As shown The proposed private road accessing the short subdivision does not meet KCRS Section 2,07. The road must contain a vertical curb along its south edge per KCRS Drawing #1-010. Please revise the site plan to show this. 3. The proposed project is within the designated "urban" area. The proposed thickened edge and asphalt shoulder is not permitted for the on-site road per the KCRS, Section 2.03 in urban areas unless a variance from the standard is obtained. 4 The private road as proposed is acceptable however an agreement to use the cul-de-sac bulb by the neighboring property (Tax Lot # 6199000125) will be required. A note to this effect will be recorded on the face of the short plat. B. Drainage l. The ventilation grates for the underground RID vault cannot be located in the roadway per KCSW/DM, Section 5.3.3.1. Please revise the RID design to show the grates outside the travel lane. 2. A 3 to I length to Jidth ratio is required for the RID facility. Please demonstrate how this is accomJlished. 3. The Level I (last plge) shows a pipe extending easterly from the RID facility to the street drainage syiem within the plat ofFlevue Des Voiles, KC File L04P0002. This conflicts witl!i the engineering plans for the plat. A conceptual drainage plan is required demo1strating how the two drainage systems will connect. Please coordinate this wtth the proponent ofFlevue Des Voiles. of the site must e provided to allow construction of the discharge pipe. . 4. The proposed shLt plat depends on the completion of Flevue Des Voiles plat for drainage discharge. The proposed drainage facility along with the discharge pipe crossing the taxf arcel to the east must be completed in the event Flevue Des Voiles plat fails A letter of intent from the tax parcel (6199000220) directly east If you have any questions egarding the road and drainage standards, please contact Curt Foster at (206) 296-7106. C. Recreation Plan The conceptual recreation plan does not show the location of water main easement. Please be advised that no anchored br permanent structure can be placed within the water easement without approval from thb Water District. A detailed recreation and landscaping plan will be required during engineeri~g review plan. This will be a condition of approval. D. Tree ReplacemJnt · Please remove the propJsed tree replacements from the site plan. A separate tree replacement plan will be required fot review and approval during the Engineering Review phase. The tree replacement plan must be prepared showing tree species and other details and must be submitted along the rodd and drainage plans. This will be a condition of preliminary approval. Please submit the folltwing by March 20, 2006: I. Four copies of/a conceptual drainage plan showing the items discussed above. This plan must be ~repared, stamped, and signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State ofWash(gton. 2. Letters of intent from tax parcels 6199000125 and 6199000220 as discussed above. 3. Four copies olr a revised site plan to match the revised conceptual drainage plan. ., -;,! 4. Two copies of a reduced site plan 8 Y, by 14. If you have any questions regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project/Program Manager Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division cc: Fanny & Philip Yee Curt Foster, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, Land Use Services Division · Application File SOOS CREEK WATJillll,:: SEWER DISTRICTf/1 14616 S.E. 192nd St. • P.O. Bnx 58039 • Renton, WA 98058-1039 • Phone (253) 630-9900 • Fax (253) 630-5289 September I, 2005 K.C. D.D.E.S. Ms. Fanny Yee RE: Short Plat Dear Fanny: This letter is in response to your request for a letter to reduce a JO-foot construction easement that Soos Creek now holds for the installation of a water line to a I 0-foot easement. Soos Creek will require a minimum ofa JO-foot easement for the installation of the water line; however, we have no problem reducing that to a I 0-foot easement after the line is constructed. The easement we are discussing is from Alaskan House Movers to King County Water District No. 58 (33-23-5-21). Sincerely, Q4t{~ Ron Speer District Manager RS:lks C:\Linda\LETfERS\FannyYce.doc W\VW.S(lOSCrcck.com • Land Use and Development consultants 10658 Riviera Place N.E. •Seattle• Washington • 98125 • Tel: (206) 306-8880 • Fax: (206) 362--6848 January 5, 2006 Ms. Fereshteh Dehkordi, Senior Planner King County DDES-LUSD 900 Oaksdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055 Re: Yee Short Plat-Responses to 8/23/05 Notice of Request for Additional Information °"' .. ::ofy ,n, No L04S0065 00 ~! ;/ ,;,1~@ Hope you had a wonderful holiday and looking forward to an even better new yl(i;IC IJlifJ f3f~w.rJting in response to your Notice of Request for Additional Information dated August 23, 20t55regartling the Subject Project. Our responses are enumerated similar to your original letter and are in bold. Original County comments appear in Italics. 1. A revised conceptual plan must be prepared to show an appropriate drainage discharge location. If the discharge location will be into a sensitive area, then a conceptual discharge design must be shown. Since you plan to locate the detention vault under the road, please show that in the revised drainage plan. Road plan revised to show detention in the proposed cul-de-sac and conveyance going to the east via the existing water easement out side the area with toy structures and into to the proposed adjacent development conveyance system. Letter of intent fonn the adjacent property is included in the Preliminary TIR. 2. If you plan to make the proposed road a public road, then a letter of agreement from the property owner directly to the west shall be provided to allow for dedication of his property road frontage. There is no plan to dedicate the proposed road. That portion of the cul-de-sac containing the detention vault could be dedicated to the County if required. 3. The conceptual road plan shows a drainage system located in the center of the road. KCRS Drawing 1-003 requires a crowned centerline unless a variance to this requirement is approved. This will be a condition of approval. Road design changed to show a crowned centerline per KCRS Standard Drawing 1- 003. 4. Please be advised that the County will require that all toy structures be safely and permanently anchored. This may conflict with the Utility District's easement. Please prepare a conceptual recreation tract showing the location of the easement, landscaping, toy facilities and any other improvements. The conceptual recreation plan must be ·f :r 1 i' ~ " ~~ t .. , LI• ,,. , '' L ' ' . ~ ' ,, \' ,., : . . , ,. ,._, I . '.) . ' ''Ms. Dehkordi January 5, 2006 Page2of2 .. reviewed by the district to determine that no conflict will exist. Soos Creek Water and Sewer in a letter had agreed to relinquish the north 20' of the eltisting 30' water line easement subject to final review. All toy structures that require anchoring will be located out side the remaining south 10' of the water line easement Conceptual Recreation Space Plan is now added to Sheet 2 of 2 of the Short Plat map. 5. The preliminary TIR proposed the use of infiltration for flow control. If infiltration is to be used, a soils report must be prepared and submitted for review by ODES. The report must include the infiltration rate. Altematively, the TIR and conceptual drainage plan may be revised to reflect a larger pond size without the use of infiltration. Infiltration at this time will not be used. The TIR calculations show detention sizing per Level 2 Flow control. Addendum 1. The current discharge point located in the Soos Creek Plat (off-site) does not appear to comply with the natural discharge location. KCSWDM Section 1.2.1 states the following: "All surface water runoff from a project must be discharged at the natural location so as not to be diverted onto or away from downstream properties. The manner in which it is discharged from the project must not create a significant impact to downhill properties or drainage systems (see "Discharge Requirements'?.· A SWDM adjustment will be required with the next submittal. Since the Plat of Fleuve Des Voiles does not drain to the natural discharge location. It is anticipated the Plat of Fleuve Des Voiles will change their preliminary design to be in compliance with KCSlll/011/l Section 1.2.1. If they don't, It would be logical for Fleuve Des Voiles to request a Slfl/011/l adjustment Enclosed please find copies of documents cited in this letter and 4 copies of the revised drainage plans. We do not see the need to revise the site plan. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact me at (206) 306-8880 or email me at deenlang@yahoo.co Enclosure Cc Fanny Yee ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 January 4, 2006 De-En Lang Lang Associates Inc. 10658 Rivera Place NE Seattle, WA 98125 RE: Application for the Preliminary Yee Short Plat DDES File No. L04S0065 Dear Mr. Lang: • Thank you for your request for an extension of the deadline for the submittal of the additional information required to process the above referred preliminary short plat application. The request for additional infomrntion stops all processing of the plat application until the required information is received. The time spent waiting for infonnation to be submitted is not counted toward any time limit requirements of the plat application process. Per your request a final extension has been granted If the Land Use Services Division of DOES does not receive the necessary information requested to process your application by March 6, 2006, your application may be canceled or denied. · If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, l-~-1).Ju.~~' Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division Cc: Curt Foster, Engineer, Engineering Review Section Planning File ® .. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 August 23, 2005 De-En Lang Lang Associates Inc. 10658 Riviera Place NE Seattle, WA 98125 - RE: Notice of Request for Additional Information or Studies, KC File L04S0065 Dear Mr. Lang: We have reviewed the supplemental information submitted on July 23; 2005 and have the following comments: 1. A revised conceptual plan must be prepared to show an appropriate drainage discharge location. Ifthe discharge location will be into a sensitive area, then a conceptual discharge design must be shown. Since you plan to locate the detention vault under the road, please show that in the revised drainage plan. 2. If you plan to make the proposed road a public road, then a letter of agreement from the property owner directly to the west shall be provided to allow for dedication of his property road frontage. 3. The conceptual road plan shows a drainage system located in the center of the road. KCRS Drawing 1-003 requires a crowned centerline unless a variance to this requirement is approved. This will be a condition of approval. 4. Please be advised that the County will require that all toy structures be safely and permanently anchored. This may conflict with the Utility District's easement. Please prepare a conceptual recreation tract showing the location of the easement, landscaping, toy facilities and any other improvements. The conceptual recreation plan must be reviewed by the district to determine that no conflict will exist. 5. The preliminary TIR proposed the use of infiltration for flow control. If infiltration is to be used, a soils report must be prepared and submitted for review by ODES. The report must include the infiltration rate. Alternatively, the TIR and conceptual drainage plan may be revised to reflect a larger pond size without the use of infiltration. llii!AlllM IFlllE COl?Y /J (j(/ Please submit the following by October 24, 2005: 1. Four copies of a revised conceptual drainage plan 2. Four copies of a revised site plan if any change is proposed 3. Four copies of a concep ual recreation plan 4. A letter of approval regarding the recreation plan by the District. 5. A letter of intent from tHe property owner directly west of site agreeing to dedicate frontage for a public roa~. . · 6. Four copies of a Soils Report, stamped by a licensed engineer. I If you have any questions regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-717 Sincerely, --=t._, A~ 1)___4\r~ Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project/Program Manager Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division cc: Fanny & Philip Yee Curt Foster, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, Land Use Services Division Application File ' .. ·@ • Kiogo...y Dq,,. a1'Dtvclopmm1 ood Envinmmcnl.ol Sema,o Lanc1 Uu ~'ka Dhillo11 . 3600 13611, PIO&C s...- lkllt\11f, Wlllhing,,m ,a006-J4DO / -~ ·. . L '1A.." oo o t; r ---:. 1 · • ProJect No: ,... ___ v-r~_...J __________ i . Date scamp: l L (p· . ! . 1~Jlljfl . Project Name: /If/£ ,J/1:!iT f>LdT j :17 · {) la1T11g Assocoai~es, D1T11c. • · , From: Land Use & Development Consultants 00' ~-@· ~ ~ ~ rn [0 1 ,_![ 10658 Riviera Place N.E. Seattle WA 98125 · Tel. (206) 30S.8880 Fax (208) 362-6848 , JU.L 2 3 ~,~-i '7' I . I.\J\,iJ I ! To: ~1}1(#1 .µg~!)I . . i ' ' l j K.C. D.D.E.S. ! L--·---·-.:...----···--::----! D !Resubmittal D Peer review D LUSD review 'D Change order D Initial submittal D Resubmittal L04SO,Q65 ); . . . Additional information; as requested! by ll<C staff . . D Please briefly describe plan, information: l'l"Y"t""'"'m:-~:,,,,. . .w,....v.; .... .,.,,.,.i•.y;~·~., •• ,.~ ........ '1:;0.0,C • !PlA T/PUD REVISIONS (check appropriate box) ·················""""''~ ....... ;-. .... -~ ........ , ...... :···· ......... , .. ,.. . · Revisions Submitted BEFORE Public Hearing )( Requested through screening D Requested by planner assigned lo the plat iO Ar:>licant generated Revisions AFTER Pu!)lic fiearing . ·o Requested by LUSD staff Specify who_~:-:---,,-...,....,.- 0 Required by condition of plat approval (i.e., staff report) . D Applicant generated ' . VIAIN FILE COPY Please briefly describe revision; . ' :ztt ,d?,-SQ~P!t-&1i~~ () • la!ll1l@ ffe\ssocoai~es, ~ll1lc. Land Use and Development consultants 10658 Riviera Place N.E. •Seattle• Washington• 98125 • Tel: (206) 306-8880 • Fax: (206) 362-6848 July 20, 2005 L04S Ms. Fereshteh Dehkordi, Senior Planner King County DDES-LUSD 900 Oaksdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055 06 5ffeJ&@&DW&tfii . · JUL 2 3 zoos L!:!) K.c. o.o.E.s. Re: Yee Short Plat-Responses to Notice of Request for Additional Information King County File No. L04S0065 Dear Fereshteh: It is so nice to work with you again. We are writing in response to your Notice of Request for Additional Information dated March 15, 2005 regarding the Subject Project. Our responses are enumerated similar to your original letter and are in bold. Original County comments appear in Italics. A. Access and Traffic: A power pole is located in the area where the new road is proposed. KCRS (Section 5.11) requires 10 feet of clearance between the obstacle (power pole) and the edge of the travel lane (or 5.5 feet from the face of a vertical curb). Because of road improvement, the power pole must be relocated unless a variance from this requirement is granted. Acknowledged. We will take care of this during construction. B. Drainage. King County Surface Water Design Manual ISWDMl: 1. Drainage appears to leave the site in the form of sheet flow. A drainage conveyance system must be provided to convey concentrated runoff across the down-slope properties to an acceptable discharge point. As proposed, this proposal will depend on the approval and construction of the proposed plat of Soos Creek, KC File L04P0002. Because of uncertainty regarding the completion and timing of the Soos Creek Plat, this proposal may have to be placed on hold until Soos Creek plat receives a preliminary approval. Otherwise, an off-site conveyance system from the site to an appropriate discharge point together with appropriate easements across neighboring properties must be secured. Letters of intent from neighboring property owners indicating a willingness to grant easements are required. We have obtained letter of intent from abutting owner and contract purchaser of neighboring property for the exchange of easements. Please see attached letters. As suggested by Mr. Bruce Whittaker, We are also Ms. Dehkordi July 20, 2005 Page 2 of2 ( • working with the applicant of "Fleuve Des Voiles" to provide drainage discharge connection. 2. The property contains a wetland along the east property line and a storm drainage system running just off site along the northern property boundary. Delineation of the 100 year flood plain for the wetland and drainage course is required prior to preliminary approval. Our understanding is that applicants of the subject short plat and Fleuve Des Voiles both intent to alter the non-regulated wetland. Therefore, delineation of the 100-year flood plain would no be useful. c. Platting and Survey requirements: 1. The contours must be based on a field survey per KCC 19A.08.150B.2. A statement to this effect must be shown on the site plan. A copy of the topographic survey certified by Mr. Dale Oaks, PLS (Certification No. 19635) was included in the initial submittal of the subject short plat We can submit another one if the map is misplaced. 2. The site plan shows a fence and a shed encroachment along the south boundary of the site. This encroachment issue must be resolved prior to the final engineering plan approval. Please show how this encroachment will be resolved. These encroachments are recent and do not have adverse possession rights. Ms. Yee had granted property owners temporary easement for the encroachments. Grantees are required to relocate the encroaching elements on demand (AF# 20041130000990 & 20041130000991 copies enclosed). 3. As proposed, the recreation tract and the detention vault will be located within a 30-foot water main easement (recording No 7810020168). This easement must be relocated. A letter of agreement from the easement holder to allow relocation or relinquishment of the easement must be provided. Soos Creek Water & Sewer District does allow the use of the easement for vault and/or recreation spaces. The district will only use the south 10' of the easement and the detention facility (most likely a detention tank) would fit within the remaining 20'. Letter from the District is forth coming. 4. Please provide a copy of easement AF# 711006608 to show that it allows the required road improvement within the easement. This item was clarified by Mr. Pat Simmons in his email dated 4/1/05 (attached). In addition, the Yees had reserved an easement when they sold the Tax Parcel 619900125 (AFN 8203220316 copy enclosed). Ms. Dehkordi • July 20, 2005 Page 3 of3 D. Recreation Tract The proposed combined drainage and recreation tract must allow for a full improvement of the recraation tract as an active recreation area together with landscaping and other related improvements. If other design constraints require the relocation of the vault, it will be preferable to locate the recreation tract where Lot 2 is proposed. The district has indicated that we can use the easement for recreation as long as nothing is anchored to the ground. Letter from the District is forth coming. Enclosed please find copies of documents cited in this letter. We do not see the need to revise the site plan at this time. We are working with the applicant of Fleuve Des Voiles on the Conceptual Drainage Plan. It will be submitted as soon as they are revised. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact me at (206) 306- 8880 or email ft deenlang@yahoo.com. Sincerely,/ / LANG A soc1AfEs, 1Nc. ,f '"'"' -"" y President Enclosure Cc FannyYee June 22, 2005 The Ritz Trust Tina M Walters, Trustee 26422 227th Ct. SE Maple Valley, WA 98038 LJETTJER OlF :U:NTJENT Re: Fleuve des Voiles, L04P0002 To Whom It May Concern: /XJ&@&owm JUL 23 2005 w K.c. oo .. E.s The Ritz Trust owns the parcel known as tax lot 619900-0220 which is one of three parcels (most westerly) that comprise the Fleuve des Voiles preliminary plat application. Ms. Fanny Y. and Philip M. Yee own the property adjacent to and west of the Ritz Trust property near its northern edge. The Soos Creek Water and Sewer District, in its Water Availability Certificate of June 17, 2005, indicates that development of the Fleuve des Voiles plat will require a connection to the existing stubbed out water line on the Yee's property. The Yees are desirous of allowing treated storm water to drain through the future Fleuve des Voiles storm system. The Ritz Trust and the Y ees have agreed to the language of a Mutual. Easement Agreement (attached). It is the intention of the Ritz Trust to sign the Mutual Easement Agreement as soon as Fleuve des Voiles receives preliminary plafapproval from King County. Sincerely, The Ritz Trust --'~· ~ U,-t,..,t~· Tina M. Waiters . Trustee Encl. Mutual Easement Agreement ' . • LETIER OF INTENT {fJ&@&ow& June 24,005 JUL 2 32acs @ Re: Yee Short Plat, L04S0065 K.c. D.D.E.s. To Whom It May Concern: Philip M. and Fanny Y. Yee ("Yee"), Husband and wife own the two tax lots 619900-0126 and 619900-0127 known as the Yee Short Plat application. Ritz Trust own Tax Lot 619900-0220 property known as the development of the Fleuve des Voiles (L04P0002), located adjacent and to the east of the Yee property. Ravenna Development, LLC, developer of Fleuve des Voiles (L04P0002) has an open escrow to purchase the Ritz Trust tax lot 619900-0220 and will complete the purchase upon preliminary plat approval. of the development of the Fleuve des Voiles (L04P0002). The Soos Creek Water and Sewer District has indicated that the development of the Fleuve des Voiles plat will require a connection to the existing stubbed out water line on the Yee's property. The Yees are desirous of allowing treated storm water to drain through the future Fleuve des Voiles storm system. The Ravenna Development, LLC and the Yees.have agreed to execute a Mutual Easement Agreement in the form attached upon the close of escrow to purchase the Ritz Trust tax lot 619900-0220. It is the intention of the Yees and Mr. Charles Spaeth, as Manager of Ravenna Development, LLC to sign the Mutual Easement Agreement in the form attached as soon as Fleuve des Voiles and Yee Short Plat receives preliminary plat approval from King County and the escrow closes on the Ritz Trust tax lot 619900-0220. YEE$ Address: 11431 -2381h Street SW Edmonds, WA 98020 Ravenna Development, LLC Address: 6839 Ravenna Ave NE Seattle, WA 98115 Attachment: Mutual Easement Agreement Form for Yees -Ravenna Development, LLC • AFTER RECORDING PLEASE RETURN TO: DE-EN LANG 10658 RIVIERA PLACE NE SEATILE, WA 98125 MUTUAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT Properties Parcel "A" Owner(s) The Ritz Trust (Ritz Trust) Tina Walters, Trustee Tax Lot 619900-0220 Number(s) Legal NORTHWESTERN GARDEN Descriptions TRACTS, DIVISION N0.5 LOT 2 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 388021 RECORDING NO 8902210370 SD SHORT PLAT OAF -TRACT 11 OF NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO 5 TGW S 240 FT OF LOT 1 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 582064 RECORDING NO 8404200923 TAXABLE PORTION PARTIALLY EXEMPT UNDER RCW 84.36.381 THRU .389 Mutual Easement Page 1 of 5 Ritz Trust -Yee Parcel "B" Philip M. Yee and Fanny Y. Yee 619900-0126 and 619900-0127 TRACT 6, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS, DIVISION NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 47 OF PLATS, PAGE 90, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 343 FEET THEREOF. ..) This Mutual Easement Agreement is made this __ day of April 2005, by and between.Tina Walters. Trustee of the Ritz Trust, hereinafter termed the 'Trustee•, and Philip M. Yee and Fanny Y. Yee. hereinafter termed the "Yee.' Trustee and the Yee are collectively referred to as "Parties.' BACKGROUND 1. Trustee's Property or Parcel "A' Trustee is the legal owner of the property located at 12208 SE 192nd Street, Renton. Washington. tax lot 619900-0220. legally described as follows: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS, DIVISION N0.5 LOT 2 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 388021 RECORDING NO 8902210370 SD SHORT PLAT OAF -TRACT 11 OF NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO 5 TGW S 240 FT OF LOT 1 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 582064 RECORDING NO 8404200923 2. Yee's Property or Parcel "B' Yee is the legal owner of the property located at 12040 SE 1901h Place and 12052 SE 1901h Place, Renton. Washington, tax lots 619900-0126 and 619900-0127, legally described as follows: Tract 6, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS, DIVISION NO. 5, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 47 of Plats. page 90, records of King County, Washington; Except the West 343 feet thereof. 3. Water Main Easement Trustee has plan to develop Parcel ·A· and desires to have an easement across the southerly ten feet of Parcel "B' for the installation and connection of a water main to the water distribution system of Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. 4. Drainage Easement Yee desires to develop Parcel "B" and needs a drainage easement for the installation of a drainage pipe across Parcel •A• for connection to the larger drainage collection system on Parcel 'A'. AGREEMENT The parties agree as follows: Mutual Easement Page 2of 5 Ritz Trust-Yee • 5. Storm Drainage for Parcel ·s· (a). Trustee agrees to create no less than a ten-foot-wide stonn drain easement, or as required by King County (or its successor), in which a stonn drainage pipe will be installed to receive direct runoff or runoff from a stonn detention system on Parcel 'B" as may be required. (b). Trustee shall detennine the exact location of said stonn drain easement which shall run easterly from the eastern boundary of Parcel ·s· to the nearest feasible point of connection to a larger stonn drainage system that shall service Parcel 'A.• The stonn drainage pipe as described in 5(a) shall not include any portion that may be used to service any potential or resulting subdivided lot(s) in Parcel "A." (c). Trustee will be responsible for the selection and hiring of professionals for the design and construction of the stonn drainage pipe described in (5a), in a manner acceptable to King County (or its successor), as part of the larger drainage system that shall service Parcel 'A.' (d). Yee shall pay for the design, engineering and construction of the stonn drainage pipe described in (5a) directiy to the engineer, consultant and contractor as itemized bid items and in separate billings. (e). The granting of said easement is subject to the condition that Yee pays for. (i) all costs of facilities to be constructed on Parcel 'B', and (ii) any incremental costs for facilities to be constructed on Parcel 'A·, which are directiy atbibutable to the added stonn drainage volume from Parcel 'B". These incremental costs include, but are not necessarily limned to, engineering design, permitting, construction of improvements and/or modifications, and/or enlargement of stonn water detention, treatment, infiltration and/or discharge facilities on Parcel 'A'. (ij. Trustee makes no warranty that the conveyance of stonn runoff from Parcel 'B' can be permitted; or constructed for a specific cost. Yee shall not be responsible for the cost of any portion of the stonn drainage system that may benefit Parcel 'A' except as set forth in 5(e). 6. Water Main Easement for Parcel "A" (a). Yee agrees to grant no less than a ten-foot-wide easement to Soos Creek Water and Sewer District for a water main that shall be designed or approved by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. The easement will run from the eastern boundary of Parcel "A", through an area defined as the southe~y thirty (30) feet of Parcel "B." (b). The owner of Parcel 'B" agrees to grant no less than a thirty-foot-wide construction easement to accommodate installation of the water main. Mutual Easement Page3of 5 Ritz Trust -Yee ( (c). This water main shall be Installed at the sole cost of Trustee. (d). Trustee agrees to restore Parcel "B' to its original condition before construction with the exception of restoring vegetation that will have been removed from within the southerly thirty (30) feet of Parcel "B' during construction. 7. All provisions herein are to be completed within ten years from the date of this agreement. 8. This agreement is made for the mutual benefit of both parties; neither party will receive additional compensation directly or indirectly through another party for actions, conveyances, fulfillment of any obligations described above beyond the specific considerations described in this Agreement. 9. If any suit or action is commenced by either party, or their successors and/or assigns, to enforce any rights under this agreement, in addition to costs provided by statute, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of attorney's fees in such sum as the Court may adjudge just and reasonable. 10. The provisions of this Agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon future owners of Parcel •A• and Parcel "B. • according to the terms set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have set our hands and seals this_ day of March 2005. Trustee: Yee: Tina Walters, Philip M. Yee Trustee of the Ritz Trust Fanny Y. Yee STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING ) ss. On this __ day of Apnl 2005, before me personally appeared PHILIP M. YEE and FANNY Y. Y!;E. to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and Mutual Easement Page4 of 5 Ritz Trust -Yee • foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said Grantors, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year above written. STA TE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING ) ss. Print Name: ________ _ NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington Residing at My commission expires:----~ On this __ day of April 2005, before me personally appeared T ma Walters. to me known to be the Trustee of the Ritz Trust clescribed in and who executed the within and foregoing instrumen~ and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said Grantees, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year above written. Mutual Easement Page 5 of 5 Ri1z Trust· Yee Print Name: ________ _ NOT ARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington Residing at My commission expires:-----· so;s ~REEK wA1'1 & SEWER v1srRicrflfs:::il-Jsao(()5 Fl>/ 14616 S.E. 192nd St. • P.O. Box 58039 • Renton, WA 98058-1039 • Phone (253) 630-9900 • Fax (253) 630-5289 July 21, 2005 Ms. Fanny Yee 11431 238 1h St SW Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Pared Nos. 619900 0126 aml 0127 Yee Short Plat Dear Ms. Yee: This letter confirms that the District is not opposed to playground equipment within the proposed water easement area of this short plat with the understanding that the equipment is not permanently anchored. The District will not take any responsibility for the equipment in the event that they need to access their easement. Please contact me at (253) 630-9900 ext I 07 or via email at amarshall@sooscreek.com if you have any questions. Sincerely, Alice R. Marshall Supervisor, Development Administration Enclosures MAIN FILE COPY www.sooscreek.com & j . l. /JA. lta11l'i)~ A~co~ft~$, ~ll'i)c. ~ Land Use and Development Consultants 10658 Riviera Place N.E. •Seattle• Washington• 98125 • Tel: (206) 306-8880 • Fax: (206) 362-6848 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Ms. Fereshteh Dehkordi King County DDES-LUSD 900 Oaksdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055 From: De-En Lang, President CC: Date: August24,2005 Re: Yee Short Plat L04S0065 COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 7/2.1/05 Letter from Soos Creek Water & Sewer District I was hoping to submit this when we revise the vault location. If you have any questions please email me atdeenlang@yahoo.com or call meat(206) 306-8880. Thanks 0 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 May 26, 2005 De-En Lang Lang Associates Inc. 10658 Rivera Place NE Seattle, WA 98125 RE: Application for the Preliminary Yee Short Plat DDES File No. L04S0065 Dear Mr. Lang: Thank you for your request for an extension of the deadline for the submittal of the additional information required to process the above referred preliminary short plat application. The request for additional information stops all processing of the plat application until the required information is received. The time spent waiting for information to be submitted is not counted toward any time limit requirements of the plat application process. The March 15, 2005 letter provided a deadline of May 15, 2005 for the submittal of the requested information. We are granting an extension to this deadline. If the Land Use Services Division ofDDES does not receive the necessary information requested to process your application by July 29, 2005, your application may be canceled or denied. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, t---w:;:_,. C)..h.~ Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division Cc: Curt Foster, Engineer, Engineering Review Section Planning File Dehkordi, Fereshteh From: Sent: To: De-En Lang [deenlang@yahoo.com] Thursday, May 26, 2005 10:04 AM Fereshteh Dehkordi Cc: Fanny Yee Subject: Yee Short Plat L04S0065 Fereshteh Page I of I We have been working on getting a mutual easement from the proposed plat (L04P0002) east of the subject short plat for months. But because the plat applicant is the contract purchaser, he has to obtain signature from the current property owner who is a Trust. The trust is run by one of the family members who has no experience in these matters. So we are waiting for the trust to understand the issue then sign the easement agreement. In short, we need more time to provide you with the additional information you requested. Please give us another 60 days. Thank you for your help. De-En 05/26/2005 \ ' I • • L04S0065 Print -Close Window From: "Simmons, Pat" <Pat.Simmons@METROKC.GOV> To: cc: "'De-En Lang'" <deenlang@yahoo.com>, "Dehkordi, Fereshteh" <Fereshteh.Dehkordl@METROKC.GOV> "Fanny Yee" <fyee@nud.net>, "Mike Harrisn <michael.harris@ctt.com> Subject: RE: Yee Short Plat L0450065 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:53:29 -0800 Mike The recording number is item #7 per your title report 1144207 That is recording number 7810060608 this is shown as the legal access to the lot on the survey map. The item that needed to be clarified is the ingress, egress, drainage and utility easement shown of the assessor map and given title report. I additional research the easement was created on unrecorded short plat 07257 which I have got a copy from or record. These easement do not restrict improvements by a benefited owner at their expense. Sorry for the typing error. Pat ---Original Message---- From: De-En Lang [mailto:deenlang@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 11:03 AM To: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Cc: Simmons, Pat; Fanny Yee; Mike Harris SUbject: RE: Yee Short Plat L04S0065 "Dehkordl, Fereshteh" <Fereshteh.Dehkordi@IVIETROKC.GOV> wrote: De-En: The easement Number according to Pat Simmon our platting engineer who reviewed the legal documents for this proposal is AF# 7110060608. A copy of this easement is needed to assure required improvements can be placed within the easement ROW. Pat can be reached at (206) 296-6636. Fereshteh --Original Message--- From: De-En Lang [mailto:deenlang@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 10:35 AM To: Harris, Mike Cc: Curt Foster; fereshteh.dehkordi@metrokc.gov; Fanny Yee SUbject: RE: Yee Short Plat L04S0065 I'm trying to get County to clarify this. De-En MAIN FILE COPY http://us.f547.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?box=Lang%20Assoc&Msgid=397 ... 7/18/2005 l • • • "Harris, Mike" <lllllchael.Harrls@ctt.com> wrote: De-En, this is an incomplete recording number. I don't see anything close to that in our report and the recordings for 10/6/1971 don't go up that high. Mike Title Officer, Unit 10 Builder/Developer Unit 206 628-5623 fax 206 628-5657 e: michael. harris@ctt.com From: De-En Lang [mailto:deenlang@yahoo.rom] Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 4:57 PM To: Mike Hanis; Mike Harris Subject: Fwd: Yee Short Plat L04S0065 Your order #001144207. Mike could you get me a copy of AF 711006608 ? Thanks. De-En De-En Lang <deenlang(gahoo.com> wrote: Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:26:40 -0800 (PS1) From: De-En Lang <deenlang@yahoo.com> Subject: Yee Short Plat L04S0065 To: Trishah Bull <trishah.bull@metrokc.gov> CC: Bruce Whittaker <bruce.whittaker@rnetrokc.gov>, Fanny Yee <fyee@nud.net>, Mike Luna <rnikelunasadlerbamard@earthlink.net> Trishah We couldn't find the following referenced easement on the survey map nor in the title report. Could you tell us where is this easement shown? Thanks. De-En c. Platting and Survey requirements: 4. Please provide a copy of easement AF# 711006608 to show that it allows the required road improvement within the easement. http://us.f547.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?box=Lang%20Assoc&Msgld=397 ... 7/18/2005 ,. ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 March 15, 2005 De-En Lang Lang Associates Inc. 10658 Riviera Place NE Seattle, WA 98125 RE: Notice of Request for Additional Information or Studies, KC File L04S0065 Date Filed: December 27, 2004 Date of Complete Application: January 17, 2004 Dear Mr. Lang: The purpose of this letter is to notify you pursuant to Ordinance 12196 that the Land Use Services Division is requesting additional information and/or studies to complete the review of your project. The information is described on the enclosed plat screening transmittal. When submitting the requested information, include a copy of the plat screening transmittal and retain a copy for your records. Provide a cover letter which lists how each item was addressed. Any clarification or explanation of the submittal can also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION ATTN: Fereshteh Dehkordi, Current Planning Section 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 If the submittal is hand delivered, submit it at the address above. Your application is on "hold" from the date of this notice, until the date you are advised that the additional information satisfies this request, or 14 days after the date the information has been provided. You will be notified if the Division determines that the information is insufficient. Please note that the supplemental information required after vesting of a complete application shall not affect the validity of such application. @ ---II II ·«Ji) ' D. Recreation Tract The proposed combined drainage and r creation tract must allow for a full improvement of the recreation tract as an active recreation area together wilh landscaping and other related improvements. If other design constraints require the relocation of the vault, it will be preferable to locate the recreation tract where Lot 2 is proposed. Please provide the following by May 20, 2005: 1. 2. Four copies of a conceptual draf nage plan to show how the runoff from the development will be discharged. Letter ~f intent from the adjacert property owners granting easement for drainage discharge across their properties. · 3. 4. A copy of the easement langua e for AF# 7110060608. . I Ten copies of a revised site plah ifrevision is made. .scr LF/PlatSCR.Sub 2/24/98 clc ="~·-···-•=•saa, •• ts -- King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 A. Access and Traffic: ..,hort Plat Screening lransmitl LUSD File No. L04S0065 Date of Information Request: May 15, 2005 Deadline for Submittal of Information: May 20, 2005 A power pole is located in the area where the new road is proposed. KCRS (Section 5.11) requires 10 feet of clearance between the obstacle (power pole) and the edge of the travel lane (or 5.5 feet from the face of a vertical curb). Because of road improvement, the power pole must be relocated unless a variance from this requirement is granted. B. Drainage, King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM): 1. Drainage appears to leave the site in the form of sheet flow. A drainage conveyance system must be provided to convey concentrated runoff across the down-slope properties to an acceptable discharge point. As proposed, this proposal will depend on the approval and construction of the proposed plat of Soos Creek, KC File L04P0002. Because of uncertainty regarding the completion and timing of the Soos Creek Plat, this proposal may have to be placed on hold until the Soos Creek plat receives a preliminary approval. Otherwise, an off-site conveyance system from the site to an appropriate discharge point together with appropriate easements across neighboring properties must be secured. Letters of intent from neighboring property owners indicating a willingness to grant easements are required. 2. The property contains a wetland along the east property line and a storm drainage system running just off site along the northern property boundary. Delineation of the I 00 year flood plain for the wetland and drainage course is required prior to preliminary approval. C. Platting and Survey requirements: I. The contours must be based on a field survey per KCC l 9A.08. l 50B.2. A statement to this effect must be shown on the site plan. 2. The site plan shows a fence and a shed encroachment along the south boundary of the site. This encroachment issue must be resolved prior to the final engineering plan approval. Please show how this encroachment will be resolved. 3. As proposed, the recreation tract and the detention vault will be located within a 30-foot water main easement (recording No 7810020168). This easement must be relocated. A letter of agreement from the easement holder to allow relocation or relinquishment of the easement must be provided. 4. Please provide a copy of easement AF# 711006608 to show that it allows the required road improvement within the easement. .scr LF/PlatSCR.Sub 2/24/98 clc, D. Recreation Tract The proposed combined drainage d recreation tract must allow for a full improvement of the recreation tract as an active recreation area together with landscaping and other related improvements. If other design constraints require the relocation o the vault, it will be preferable to locate the recreation tract where Lot 2 is proposed. Please provide the following by ay 20, 2005: I. 2. 3. 4. Four copies of a conceptual drainage plan to show how the runoff from the development will be discharged. Letter of intent from the adj cent property owners granting easement for drainage discharge across their properties. j A copy of the easement Ian uage for AF# 7110060608. . Ten copies of a revised site b1an if revision is made. . scr LF/PlatSCR.Sub 2/24/98 clc ' j .... • February 24, 2005 Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 RE: File No. L04S0065 Dear F ereshteh, L Brenda and Ken Bulen 19007 120th Ave SE Renton, WA 98058 Thank you very much for speaking with me about my many issues regarding this project. The following are a list of my concerns: 1. The reference to relevant environmental documents is checked "Not applicable". The area under proposed development has previously failed a water percolation test, hence the need for sewer, and the parcel to the North floods during heavy rain. I am concerned that environmental impacts may not be entirely investigated. Is this true? 2. I am concerned about the ensuing removal of trees and the impact, plus the type and location of replacement trees. 3. I need to know how the impact of the slope and grading will affect my property. 4. I would like to know more about the location of sidewalk improvements and/or streetlights, and postal delivery impact. 5. I am concerned about traffic patterns. Please keep me informed about any developments regarding my outstanding issues. I can be reached at 425-235-4540, should you have any questions. Thank you very much .. Sincerely, Brenda Bulen . , I Parcel ID # 6199000125 . . J' ) soc Page I of I " rlL- Claussen, Kimberly From: Claussen, Kimberly Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 7:39 AM To: 'BENEDICT BUSH' Cc: Dehkordi, Fer~~ Subject: RE: RE File N(~ Thank you for your comments, a copy of your letter has been forwarded to the short plat file, as well as the planner on this project (Fereshteh Dehkordi, 206-296-7173). Thanks -----Original Message----- From: BENEDICT BUSH [mailto:benandgeri@msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 9:46 PM To: Claussen, Kimberly Subject: Re: RE File No. L0450065 Please find attached a copy of our original letter being mailed to the letter's address. We would appreciate that you make sure it reaches the proper persons. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Benedict & Geraldine Bush 19124 121st Place S. E. Renton WA 98058 02/09/2005 C February 9, 2005 Dept of Development & Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton WA 98055-1219 RE: Application L04S0065 Dear Sirs: We are 17-year property owners just south of this property and have several concerns: 1. .96 acres is not an acre. Why is there an application for 6 homes? Our cul-de-sac is about 2.5 acres, and only 8 homes. We purchased property because of the view we have (for now) and the amount of land that each homeowner owns. We dispute the necessity of 6 homes on this property. They will be too close together and they probably will be too large. 2. This property, along with ours, is on the hill on the west side above Soos Creek. We are concerned about the amount of water that flows underground all the properties in this area and the amount of potential pollution of Soos Creek. Although we are on the hill, we are not at the high point of the hill, and there can be a tremendous amount of water flow underground during a wet season. Topically, we've had some driveways flood/washout in past years; one home lost their basement to flooding several years ago. The property involved in this application does not have evergreen trees on it, which, we understand, means a higher water table. More houses, more water problems. On the south side of SE l 92"ct, we know of a house that ended up with a "sink ho le" in their front yard. They just happen to be east of a newer cul-de-sac with 25 homes in it. Isn't it possible the sink hole was caused by excess water flowing and being disturbed underground from the construction of all those homes? 3. The traffic congestion is getting worse. There is a new area under construction with 58 homes in it -IO feet between each house. Calculating 2 vehicles per house, and then counting all the applications in process in the one square mile around us, we're looking at probably 300 more vehicles and pollution from them on our roadways. Already, we find it is more difficult to get out on our major road from our cul-de-sac entrance. It used to be waiting for a car to go by; now it can be a dozen or more. Used to take just a minute, now can take 2-5 minutes or more! Other than Benson Road, all our roads are 2 lanes and can barely handle the traffic as it is. We don't want more lanes, we want less traffic! -P-A~Rc::TY~Oc=F'"' RECORD 4. And what about fire safety between homes? With only IO feet between houses, how can a frre department properly protect the neighborhood? . .. , 5. We have paid high property taxes in King County for this urban property we own for all these years, and we highly dispute what King County has done to our zoning rights. The last meeting we were notified of and attended, this area was zoned at one house per half acre. We have had no other notification, but it appears that somehow, these properties were changed to R6 zoning and those of us with more land highly disapprove of this dense construction that is being allowed. This particular application appears to indicate 6 homes per half acre? What kind of zoning is that? 6. We are NOT city dwellers. Ifwe had wanted to live close to our neighbors, we would have moved within the city limits! What about OUR property rights and OUR quality oflife? We can understand people wanting to develop their land, but WHY does it have to be so dense? People want open space between their units, not just a tiny patch of green space on a comer of the property. In general, people have sized down their families; what happens to all these huge homes when they are no longer needed or wanted? We request that you reconsider the number of homes on this property, if the application itself cannot be denied. Renton WA 98058 YEE 6-.LOT SHORT PLAT Permit Approval Conditions Document Fire System Review Tracking Numbers: L04S0065 Fire Engineering approval may be granted with the following conditions: AAOl EICHHORN Any questions regarding the fire review of this plan should be directed to: Paul Eichhorn, Supervisor, Fire Engineering. Telephone: (206) 296-6741 FH74 PRELIMINARY APPROVAL Preliminary Fire Engineering approval has been granted based upon the following information provided. To obtain final Fire Engineering approval, the following item(s) must be submitted to the DDES permit service center; reviewed and approved: I. Certificate of Water Availability. (Provided by appropriate water purveyor). Valid one year from date of signature. Minimum acceptance flow shall be I 000 gallons per minute at 20 pounds per square inch residual pressure. IL Three copies of plans indicating: A. Fire hydrant(s) location -measured by vehicular travel distance. (K.C.C. Title 17) Residential [ALL 6 LOTS WITHIN THIS SHORT PLAT] I. 700 ft. maximum spacing. 2. Not more than 350 ft. from each lot. B. Watermain placement (K.C.C. Title 17) I. Source (i.e.) supply connection. 2. Main sizes identified. C. Fire access roads Ref. IFC, Sections 501 through 503, 2003 addition I. Minimum 20 ft. wide unobstructed -13'6" vertical clearance, unobstructed. All-weather surface, able to withstand 25 tons. 2. Fire access roads in excess of 150 feet (dead-ends), must have a turn- around area. Required turn-arounds must be a minimum 80-foot diameter. 3. Fire access roads must provide 20-foot minimum inside turning radius and 40 outside turning radius when said roads change direction. 4. Fire access roads shall not exceed 15% grade. 5. The required width of any fire apparatus access road shall not be obstructed in any manner, including parking of vehicles. Minimum required widths and clearances established under this section shall be maintained at all times. Fire System Review Approval Conditions Page I of2 D. Marking when required, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads and prohibit the obstruction thereof or both. Ref. IFC, Sections 501 through 503, 2003 edition Fire System Review Approval Conditions Page 2 of2 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 · January 18, 2005 De-En Lang Lang Associates Inc. 10658 Riviera Place NE Seattle, WA 98125 RE: Notice of Complete Application for Application Time Periods Application No. L04S0065 Date Filed: December 27, 2004 Yee Short Plat Dear Mr. Lang: The purpose of this letter is to notify you that on January 17, 2005 the Land Use Services Division determined that the above-referenced application is complete under current requirements for a complete application. This initial determination is intended only for the purpose of applying the time periods for permit processing specified in Ordinance 12196. Supplemental information may be requested by the Division, as necessary, for the continued review of your application. Our goal is to process your application within 120 days. However, the complexity and level of analysis required to review your project and available staff resources will affect the actual review time. The timeline can also be impacted by one or more of the following: o any request made by the Division for additional information o changes or revisions requested by the applicant o mutually-agreed-upon requests to stop the time clock o preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement o failure to post the property o resolution ofland use decisions appeals If you have any questions about your application or the posting requirements, please contact me at (206) 296-7173. . Sincerely, -:+-~\-:-:--~ \)~-=+-t Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Site Plan Review Section Enclosures cc: Fanny & Philip Yee Application File "' w .. :t ::, z w ..J -... w C 0 u ' 0 w " King County Department of Development and Environmental Services "flOO On.ke-sd.ile Avenue Southwest Renton, \\'A 98055-1219 MEMORANDUM FROM: Site Investigator 8 ETH CH ES HJEQ TO: Engineer C,uQT FOSTER RE: Field Check Observations I. PROJECT NUMBER/ NAME LOY$00(o5 / YEE <e LOT SP I Address / Location ~ I 9 00 0 I '21JJ}J A\/£ SE .) Date 3' I· S Fl eLD C.H ECK. '> Z. • S Related Project#/ Name _,Ac..u.0.,__YuP_._t'.:\_._..2~3....__S-'--------------- Thomas Map Page (new) (of>(o Thomas Guide Page (old) _______ _ l. SYNOPSIS OF PROPOSAL (p LOT S:t±Dl2CPIAI ON 2. PARCELS TQ'lAL!t--lg . 9Co AU2.E S OF 12,-Co -SO FU)\JJ (_ONTRD L L E\J EL 2. LHDA ¢ WAI ER QUALITY BASIC. 3. SIERRA FILE INFORMATION Parcel #(s) 4:>19900012 (o)Ol 2.7 • S-T-R SW 33 · L?' 05 Kroll Map (po 5 w Acres , Feet' • 9 Co A CurrentZoning (<-Ct:, -SO Community Plan Soos C-!2.EEIL, Comprehensive Plan -'U""--'-rYl..,__.,_ ___________________ _ Limited Text Entry 1<c c -((o, 62. I 50 D I SG-P3, SD· 22D PA GE l 4. SENSITIVE AREAS INFOh..tATION MAP FOLrO PAGE# SITECONIAINS SITE ABUTS YES NO YES NO COMMENTS • Wetlands ___ [Rl 0 ~ 0 VEl2'( SMALL WITLAN,D IN NE Ccf?NEI< Wetland# Wetland Class ____ Drainage Basin -------- Sub Basin Soos CREEK Critical Basin? III ffil • Streams O @ 0 ~ · ----------------- Stream Class -----Stream Name ---------------- • I 00-year Floodplain _0 lxJ _0 (X] •ErosionHazard __ O (XJ_O 12'.i §?oSIPN l'l12&A IN 'lXMNS:WEiZit:1 • Landslide Hazard _o D{]_O [)5J • Seismic Hazard __ o [sr_O IKI • Coal Mine Hazard _0 ~ ____ 0 ~ • Other known SA's -· D Kl _o [ZJ Class I or 2 Stream or Class I Wetland within one mile downstream of project site? __,fwE=-...'$,.._ __ _ SOOS C.Q EE}(. LES$ TH1'l]:J '/.., t'.) l LE FEMA FIRM number _._' ______________ In FEMA Floodplain? III ffil Soils Mapped · ' Ag B Map# -.:.1.:...I ___ _ Best available Topographical Map vS65 # 25 S. SITE DESCRIPTION MATCHES T.I.R. DESCRIPTION! "Tl-1 E. J. SQV/1;12.E f?AQC£) S fq:2/\1'\ A 0, 9 C::> ACQt, :nJE SC0$ C{2.E;Bi., Wfa}_.f'\"ND. ']JjE. S !TE 1-S c..ue.RruL'( A--CcEssro 'By A nfAvEL :D21\/EW/rr:'. :Jb THE t\t:OS.E ADJA:Ca.JI:: W IBE WEST 'A2.oM 12DJ1:i A'1E. SE ~rnDs E:2ss::r: Qtv[D ::n-!E. Pf2d?QSED scos ca..EB;:., B.Ar. :Jl:182,f; A\2..E:" AL.SQ A FEW SNAlL yc)I-JDINg 1';12.0\S. PAGE 2 I 6, EXISTING SITE FEA(URES Unmapped Sensitive Areas: --'N--=0-'-fs!"-'E=--'=S'-'EEN='-=------------------ Soils types seen and evidence of soil movement, slides, slumps, erosion, or deposition: NO Slfa NS Sf SOIL tv\0\/13:\BJ, S E'EN. Ground Cover: WiO\JD\JS :(g.£ES.-t)ts:):3£.AU'n2. 8/EJZb~ -') - A12., CED/s52.-, 12,LJsaBaz.12:r, sM-HCN Bee.e'f', 6e.M-sES a ... Existing Utilities (hydrants, signs, poles, etc.) shown on site plan! YES ND \MPIZ.OJ~:@}T'S al· s 1TI:: -AC.CBS /r?-PAf) \ MPR:Q/8V18JJ3, Ot\J S rTE F\.}QJ Wildlife and habitats: fu.lq €,112..DS · Water Wells: N0"1E SEE:}J Work started on site? _. ~~OL_ _____________________ _ Closed depression >5000 _feet'! Ill @ Steep slopes? [r] ltf ___________ _ 7,· DRAINAGE Drainage complaint records ----------------------- Proposal will add >5000ft2 of new impervious surface! Ill l!!l Approximate Area ______ _ Proposal will collect and concentrate surface and storm water runoff from an upland and site drainage area of over 5000 ft 21 Ill l!!l Approximate Area ______ _ Upland Draina~e Basin (draining directly onto site): ;;) · ?A f?.CE;LS Tb THE: WES.T Df2.Al N CNTD SITE . A j20's'DS1D£ D ITTJ:J: CN TH-E WS'S T On-site Drainage: ::::Q\E SITE::: tsf'.PEZs:Q~ TI? P/2/sJI\) :IP n-/E 1::AST YDLU:u.)l f...\,g HILD TI::/POb 12./s:PHY. Downstream Drainage (minimum 1/4 mile distance): TH:E s,rr PLQWS. c7\ST :J}ti20Jbl--r A WOODED ~ ftN D o'1e)2. A MODEV\1:£ st...WE: m n-tr; w~Ds As'SC(..1 t\'.fEJ:) wrn-t SQ?s ~ ts:ND S00ir-l w int I 10 SOC:>S 02.Ea, Tll: E PLATS OF '$CO$ cg.ff):(, /'ruD -n+~ w8:1:]ZMl'v.J PL/tf WE Qs, truP wo(2.TI-I -c:AST or Ttt1s s,iz)Q.., Pl...l<I PA G £ 3 8. EXISTING ROAD N~,WORK On~site Roads '.WcftfifD ACC'c:S Q[tcQ TI? Sn-E I.S C.W.f28vl]__, Y' A E:ir2A\/EL C@JE V-?KY- Adjacent Roads I 2DTH A:-J E SE 20' UIJ IHm'.2\lED P&/f'.D (2.0.A,-D Wm-\ G'21\5S prr:z_t1: CN L\Je$C 'SIDE: ffi'-0 6Q..A;S-s, <StID,,U)eJ< ~ ~"T SIDE Closest Transit Stop------------,---------------- 8 • E S T I M A T E O F P RO J E C T I M P A C T S O N S O I L A N D W A T E R O. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS PAGE 4 10 CONSTRUCTION SIGNS WITHIN SOO FEET AND ADJACENT USE I I NUMBER OF PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN PA GE 5 ATTACHMENT TO MEMORANDUM PROJECT NUMBER: FIELD/OFFICE SKETCH WORK: Drainage systems, features, channels within the upland site plan areas, on the development site, and in the downstream receiving areas: SKETCHED BY: SC A LE Notes:-----------------------------I"=---- 0 PA G£ 6 .,~",. Location APPLICANT: ~f/E~E~.~FAN=tN-t~PH-IU-P--------- s, .. u, idiiwiil ..!.I Plat N,m,,c fiEE SHORT P!AT &<.OT % Con,,leto: LI p .;.;.J N~o/Lol< ~ D e:a: IP.AEU Ml NARY. SHOATLeLAT ! F.DR:s.LOlS:~;:1:mlt.llilt::clllitJ:Lail/L'.1!1Li'.:UZ!J;ll!:i.J Applied Jl 2/27/2004 Parcel No:16.19900:0! 26;1,,iJ;,;,.£,,L1) Deemed Complete:j01 /18/20C6 Loedion: Vettod: 112127 /2004 C~y/Zip: SEPA\YINi[N SEPA TD:r-I_I_I_ 0 wnei: !YEERHIL!P,,M," F ANNY,;r'""';."i..'~;',,;,,;:,\'.;:.c.,,,,:;;_.;.,.,;:,;,..:,I Appicrt fiEE; FANtN.> PHIUP.,!. •• ...'::.:.:L:!...!~I P!ome,:~ Rev. Eng.:jCFOS Occ"'°""'"l.96"""-- Oevek,o: U Monday, Mar 07, 2005 03:46 PM Open Hearing: Lt_/_ Decision:L/_/_ E,....,L1_1_ R"""dodLI_I_ c.m.i,,,:1_1_1_ L.W. Stlll:ua ~: !Oll:l~,!~ E.-.,.od by: !P.1NJCT1B,:.;J Oote Ente,od!12m/2004~J ' ' rv;;~v111--,. ~ ~'1)~ @ll!J!J;lll§J@------[aw(iU{JJ(ilfun ~Oll)G!J l!Jil<¥/!ilti!ll-<!i tlll1"1llro>----i!MlOOl<!@lllli'l Parcel Number Situs Address Postal City Owner's Name <««Identification Information»>» <««Location lnlormation» > » 1/4-Sec-Twp-Rng ISW-33·23-05 Ref.No. 17257 Plat Name !NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO. 0 Lot No. Is Blk No. ~--- Ae1es I 0.48 Sq. Ft. I 21.018 Kroll Pg 1605 Engr Map No. ----- T raffle Mil Zone School District Fire District Water District Sewer District Vol./Pg. ""104""7'""10"'"90=--- r-=:,-,::---,----ClA: IGREEN420 [342 I 403 (Ren ton] 140 !Soos Creek !Soos Creek Monday, Mar 07, 2005 03:46 PM ,,.. ' c:, ~~ II !lpd<t• I I I E~it I Back I 3 Jurisdiction ~ Date Entered I 11 /24/1998 Last Update I 0911512000 <««Development Information»>» Zone 1 IR·6·SO ----------Zone 2 ZoneJ Zoning Effective Date: Land Use Code Comprehensive Plan Community Plan Public Water Avail? Public Sewer Avail? Vacancy Code I ·., .. "t ,:·: : , · .. , ---··---~J L......:__:__~;; .. J lum ISoosCre IY IN IA" Parcel Number · Situs Address Postal City Owner's Name <««Identification Information»>» l6~.990_0;0}2:~lii:Jiii1'iiL;~,1a Status IMdM#: j «<«Location Information>»» 1/4-Sec-Twp-Rng ISW-33-23-05 Ref.No. 17257 Plat Name !NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO. 0 Lot No. Is Blk No. 1----- Acres Kroff Pg I o.4a 1605 Traffic Mit. Zone School District Fire District Water District Sewer District Sq. Fl ! 20,917 Engr Map No. I 1342 Vol./Pg. -104_7_/090 __ _ =-:,,---,----aA: IGREEN420 I 403 (Ren ton) 140 !Soos Creek !Soos Creek Monday, Mar 07, 2005 03:47 PM 11 llpdat• I I I Ejpt R ..:.I Jurisdiction Date Entered Last Update I 11 /2311998 109115/2000 «<«Development Information»>» Zone 1 IR-6-SO ----------Zone 2 I ----------Zone 3 I Zoning Effective Date: Land Use Code Comprehensive Plan Commun~y Plan Public Water Avail? Public Sewer Avail? Vacancy Code L.J_1_._-~::..J L,~ ___ ; __ J !um !Soos Cre FT IN IA" ,.,,,• . jllllllJIIIIIHI FAN!t11130000990 PAGE001 OF 005 EAS 23.00 Kll/30/2004 11:15 ING COUNTY, IJA < ~i=TE~ RE9°,0ING,PL~SE ~E~~RN To,: ... / W1LL~MS~dRK ~so/ ... ·•·• i //··/ .~?;s'ErAX Ner REOUIREEl 6161 NE 17$JH, suirE2o6 / / "< <ring~Cp'ty~~DM?°?: KENMORE, WA.'il6.Q?B.' ' · · "BY:.~e:::.Ll_~ Deputy ..._:· .,/·,.~:.i' ::' •, .. _. r ,, ..... ,,,., .. TEMPORARY USE EASEMENT AGREEMENT\ " Grantor(s).:.,. Grantee{s): Benefltedeci Pr!)perty Tax Lot No./ .: .. ... :;., ·; :: 619900-0186 619900-0126 ~hisJe~;~racy'·Gs~ E~s~~~nt ;~ made this"vzi'! day of November 2004, by and between DenniskBrevik ~nd Debo/ah ~reyi(hereinafter termed the "Grantee", and Philip M. Yee and Fanny Y. Yee, hereioafterJer:med ".Grant6,r.' Grantor and Grantee are collectively referred to as "Pahies." •· ' ,.. , BACKGROUND 1. Grantor's Property I "Burde~ed.Parc~1·.i' Gran tor is the legal owner of land locafe9 at 1,2,040 ,SE 190\"'Pi'a~e. Rdnion:. Washington, tax lots 619900-0126, legaliyde~cri~ed as fo~ows/ Temporary Easement Page 1 of5 Yee· Brevik ··,. •' .. ,, •. , , NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRS DIV #5 E 143 FT OF W 486 FT OF .. TRACT 6 AKA LOT B OF REVISED K C SHORT SUBD NO 07257 . grantee's property / "Benefited Parcel" .~ .. , ./ Grc1htee is. the legal oWoer of \J'le property located to the south of Burdened ·· P,:opef!Y;Withan.iiddrEi$s df191Q.3/121st Place SE, Renton, WA 98055, tax lot No: 6:199000186, 1€1Qa!ly desciiped as follows: . • . .. ,,• ·. ··· .. ~ ./' ... t 1:,/ 1/ ,· "' NORTHWESTERN GARDEN•TRS DlV #5'!.0f 4 OF REVISED KC SHORTP,LAT'N0.879082 RECORDINGN08202190368 SD PLAT DAF -TRACTifoF NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIVNO 5 LESS E 7FTOFS240FtTHOF .. . . . 3. Encroachment Grantee has constructed a wood feni:e.acroiis th~ southern most lllree·f~ietof the Burifeo~d Property. The encroachment w.as ihd~iltifl.ed)h a ,Sepefi!i~t 2004·surveyby Sadler/Barnard & Associates,'1nc., a licensed stirveyqdn· Uie Sta.I~ of Washington. A drawing of the properties'itrid the'enc.toaphmenfiir'· inciude~~s,.Exhibit "A" for reference. "·· .. f ( .. ·····'\ \ 4. Gran.tor ha.s no iefimediate use for Burdened Property and Granteewi§hjls to lea-re the JenceJn pJace.Jemporarily. · · ·: ,; : ,, •;., ./·\ AGREEMENT The ;~rtles·~~re~ as lollo;.vs: 5. Grantor grantsa,Jemwrary ea~~enHqJ,!!!ht~ aJc:n:ig a_nd across South three feet of the biifdened'property for the ~xpressed:pqrpose of allowing Grantee to leave his feni:e temporarUy In placf .. . . 6. Grantee agrees to relocate ~i~'fen~: albng With a~y fencJhg 11i'~terials, away from the Burdened Property at his own cost, at any timll;"iiporl 3Q'<lays notice n:om G.rantor. If Grantee fails to promptly comply with Grant.or'.!! requesfto (~loccite the fence Within 30 days, Grantor may remove the fence and other ~iicroachri,ent;~nd biili;,rant~e for.th~ related costs. Grantor shall have no obligation to reiiJstall theiem9vedifen~ material'., .. ·a:.,: .:· . .-." -· .. Temporary Easement Page 2 of 5 Yee-Brevik i .Thi$}ea~ement shall continue until cancel pursuant to paragraph 6 or when the • Burdenecl:Property is sold, whichever is eartier . . ·8. ff any suitor l:lCtlon·is commenced by either party, or their successors and/or . assigns!io.enforce any rights ~rid'e(tt,is agreement, or regarding any entroachiiient,.1n· addiUon toiosts .. P!'Ovided by statute, the substantially prevaiiinil party shall b~ !!ntltted tq,iin a,ward o,! attorney's fees in such sum as the Court may a~/udg~ ju~t and ri:t~sofiable. / /' .•. . \ .. . .. >/ .i /·<·:,' ('·" < /' ~1' IN WITNESS WH!;,REOF, we haie se!'.bur haµ&~ aq{seals this 1 1 day of November 2004. /'' ' Granter: ., ...... Temporary Easement Page3 of 5 Yee-Brevik ;~~~/ .. ··Denhis.A. Brevik-· ·" ..... · ... i . .i ~:12'~~ eborahBrevik ....... / .•· STATE OF WASHINGTON) CO~NJYOF KING ) ss . ... ~ Orfthls a day of November 2004, before me personally appeared PHILIP M. YEE ~nd FANNY'Y. Yl:E:lome known to be the Individuals described in and who executed the •withiri and ~oing instriiment, a,nd a'ci<~owledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary'ad ancl,de~ of s.ai~tlranto,r.,,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. . . ...... ,, .•. ·.' .. .. ·: / .: { ,,,. '•,' :/ WITNESS my han,rand.6fficlal seal heretriaffixedcihe'ctay and year above wrttten. ·:, '·:, •. ,. ./ :: ''...,} .. / ,1' • .• ,. / :' ::ofli,lt?:~··~··/ '·: ~" ~ c, 4 .-::,~t·:/ssio';if/~:·,,,/ i ··.· ~P.r'1'n,tN,ame: ~.,A,/~ : /o ~OTA,9,-'%\ { -~Le_z_,-= i <> ..... .., \); j ·•·. / , NOTARY PUBL.IC in a~d fo{the State of '.,i>, \.. 1>us1_1C •• f ... :' ./ W_. as~-~ in~t tqq.rn_ t< Ree~i;1iaidirng.at<./ •.· d.. ,,';,;,·· ro" 1 ···,cf:: / :5'~~ W/7 ·•,,,~o··· .. :.-:;D.-<,<5' •• .: . . .. ,,. .. ...I ft '••,,!'° \'fNo\·\':>~ ,. ,'}O)q>. 0 cJ '7.,/ ''')"'•;.,·, •• '·.My eommission_,6xpir~t -..,,"'-.---"-"T-"'-\--~r .......... ,/'"'·:::,,, STAT~ OF WASHINGTON) ,.. ,,, .. ,,,. "··· COUNTY OF ~ING ' . .,· . . ) ss. i .·· ~-} ·, ............ ·; . .-:" .··· i :ion this 1:.2:_ day o(.November 2004, before me personally appeared DENNIS Ai f i BRE\//K and DEBOAAH BREVIK, to me known to be the individuals described in and,who .. : . execuied the yiitl)in an~.foregoitig instrument, and acknowledged said instrument lo be ·,, . 'ihe free and ~olµntaryact and o~ed o(said Grantees, for the uses and purposes therein me'iitldlfeil: ; / ./ i' .,/ · < .. WITNESS my h1nd and o(lici~'~ealfl~refu,a[fu.ced the qay and year above wrttten. ' ..... , ' .. ··,,;_'. . ./ . , .. de~~ ) i ,'PrintNa~: ,ktJ,•f:h~.,, ne. tr /V1,tl( l,}/JP : NOtAIW PUBLl~in and for.t!J~ State of . Temporary Easement Page 4 of 5 Yee· Brevik Washingt011 Residing at: · R:er1~il ·,-- Exhibit A Fence located north of property line I I 31: ~ 0 c> ! ~ :-' 0--- 111 .·6199000050 .. / i I / R$,6-50 /' • . / ......... . ·/'':;;:/'/'! <:.:·~/' 143.00 619900&26 Rs-8-50 Temporary Easement Page 5 of 5 Yee-Brevik 6199000059 RS-6-50 FOUND REBAR ANO CM' LS 18898 0.36' N. OF LINE 1FOt JO' WAlER MAIi R£C. NO. 78100 N , ; . ·Filed for Record at thE;l'n,iqJest of SOOS CREEK WATER _ANO SEV<.'ER DISTRICT ./· P,0. 13ox 98039 , ...... ,, ···• 1461.6 S,E. 19?1id Street Renton,.WA .9SO$i8 Easement No.: Project: ,' ,,• ·: .. _..,.-; .• ......... ,, Tax Parcel ID#: 519900-0126 iat~9bo-6121 .. ·::, .... ·.·:, .. -,:,. Grantor($): < Philip M. Yee & Fanni''(.Y!i!;: ·, 11431 2381h Avenue SW ··--·· \ Woodway, WA 98020 .. ' ,, ... ,,., ,· Graritee: / / SOOS CREEK WATER ANO SEWE~DlS1,RICT,i AGREEMENT FOR EASEMENT THIS~GhE~-~E~T/m1l'.d~ .. ~h1sabl day of ~"-"--1 < ,2004,by and between SdpSCREf;iiSWA;rE.fl AND,~EWER DISTRICT, a municipal corporation of King County, Wast,ingto.n·; hereinafter terrnedthe "District", and Philip M. Yee & Fanny Y. Yee, hereinafter te"/ined "Granfor", .,,, _,,. ./ .·.•,,. WHEREAS,, Grantofi~ the 9W9~r c?f laQd c\t'_appr9xini~tely 12040 SE 190th Place and 12052 SE 190h PL, Renton;·WA, legally,de~cn!:led.as fol!.ows: Tract 6, NORTHWESTERN GAflDJ,;N T~Acrs:Brv1siON NQ. 5, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume'47_ of Plats/page !:lo;·1ecqtds of King County, Washington; ·· · .... Except the West 343 feet thereof. · ,/ .r: .:'! ! ,• WHEREAS, the District requires art easement for (cfreqk tflose )~at iippiy) Page 1 of 5 Easement No. 33-23-5-C1020 · l8J Sanitary sewer line and appurtenances [g] ...... water main and appurtenances (for future watermain extension) ,• . . ~crpss ~rarilc;)r's J?fOpertY. at,~/f~catj6n more specifically described herein below; and .. · (vVHE~EA\~, .c3rant6f has {;;·;~)b ;~i~ \rl.<'11 property and is authorized to grant and convey this eas~ment .tb ttie DJi:iJrict. {"'/ / ) .: ,I •,'• • ,; NOW, THER'EFORE/ln c;hsicle.t,tion,;f ____________ _ --------'--" ___._·. -'--./ ($:' ·. ·· .·. . . , and.,,other good and valuable consideration in hand paiq; rece\pt <;if whichfa.herebtf\cknowfedged, and in consideration of the performance by the Disfrict,61 the c6yenants, terms ahcl):onditions hereinafter set forth, Grant or hereby grants, 2oriyeys and quitcJi:iirii~ to;the;Oi$frict the following easement: .. :: / ,:. . ... Thatportion of the above-de 1 ~crfbe~ re~,I propertf furthe(cii'i'scrlped as follows: ,• •• ·' .>' ·:. .,,~·.-,.-,,,,r:·'·"'·•,: .. The S0uttt90 feet thereof. \,,,"··· , .... , ..... , ,1. it DISTl3ICT'S USE OF PROPERTY. Said easefnepi is Jor.ihe/purpose of insta!ling, consfructfng, operating, inspecting, maintaining;'.removing,.tep'airjrig, replacing andousing· graility ~nd pressure sanitary sewer mains, manhole$ a[i'dfor Vi1ater lines and appurte.r\anq.es theretcfiholl,lding all valves and fire hydrants (the'"'f<ilcilJfies.!'j, together with tht=i nonexcii.Jsive·· r,ight of ingr;ess to and egress from said portion of Gr~n,tor's property for thefqregoing puq:ioses:\ ·· ' .. ·' .. ,, .. . •'• .. , .... ~····· 2. USE OF p'ROF>ERTY BYGRANTOR. Granter shall retain the right to use the surface of the easement if;-ll~ch .US$ do~s (JOI interfere with installation or maintenance of the facilities. Grantpr s.hiilt\,ot·i3rect·tn;iildings or structures of a permanent nature; shall not install any other improvim~nts including .tfee~ilarge shrubbery, or fences; and shall not change surface grades, exceptli's-~ppro\'.ed in' ad_val'lce by the District, in any manner which would unreasonably lnJerfer.e With Jngress,,egres$ il,l)d access by the District for installation and/or normal mafntena!)ce of the facilities:,... SUch buildings, structures or improvements will be deemed an enci9actiment,up911 ttie-t)istrict'·5rights, and Grantorshall be obligated to remove such encroachments atGr~ntgr's expep~e. Ft,irther, the provisions of Paragraph 4 hereof as to restoration shaRnot apply to imy'su,ch E1ncr9ac;rments in the easement area. Provided, however, that fences<i:pay be,constrycted,vhich provide gate or other access approved in advance by the District>'' · · · 3. RESTORATION AFTER ORIGINAL C0N$JRUCTICJN:• '56( or16rnal construction, Grantor's property will be restored to a condition-ic1s goodasqrbetter,tmm it ·: . ,. . ~ ,: F:l£l004\00107\Daign\Easernen\$ t23122\C1020_Yee-pennOOC Page 2 of 5 ~1/04 ' < Easement No. 33-23-5-C1020 · wai piibr.to the entry by the'District. Where possible, photographs will be taken prior to csfo~irudiori to assure the completeness of restoration. Final restoration shall include, as _appropri;;tte, s·9d replacement in existing lawns, hydro-seeding in unimproved areas, and ,/ repla11ting'or r,eplace.ment of existing shrubs and bushes, where such will not unreasonably · iriterterewitlJ'the bistrict'..s use qfthEl easement. Fences, rockerles, and concrete, asphalt and/or 9favel driveways \vh(q~'cJo npt unreasonably interfere with the District's use of the e1:1sement.wHI b<,/repair~d,.6i'replace~ •. Large trees that exist within the easement area may be pen:iianently rem6ved during·'origirial.ponstruction unless otherwise noted in this easement d~cumeht. /0 i .,, --... .,,./ / ' ;:,··'.,/ .i 4. °i:'lESTbRAllO~ AFTER ~AiNJfuNANCE. If Grantor's property is disturbed by the maintenance, removal, rep 9lt/c>f rElJ)lacement of the. facilities, the District shall restore the easement Iue?i to 9·conditigh as m:iod'as9r bette/ihan it was prior to entry for such purpose by the Disfrict. / · · · ·· ;',, ./ :/ .. 5. A TIORNEY'S FEES./ln case s1,1/t or ~otion,is c¢.mmenced by either party, or their succe§.sors and/or assigns, to ehforc~ ani rights un,derJhis.~asem\:)nt, or r~g,:1rding an encroachry\entpn the easement, in additi61) to ci:>sts proviged f:l,x s.tatute, the gi.Jb~tantially prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of &llorney•s' fees in SU.ch sum as the Court may adjudge, just and reasonable. ·" · . · · / · "· · . • 1· :. • •• -' ··' /6. ii EASE;MENT TO BIND SUCCESSORS ... This e~stfmeni iS 0 PElfinanent and shalf'ierminatli only upon agreement of the parties hereto, their.succE1§s,0'rs ~nd/or assigns. This easem13ht, during·its.existence, shall be a covenant runningwith the l;fnd and shall be b!{iding 00,.the successors, l)eirs and assigns of the parties hereto. ( / '··. .. . ,• . , 7. iEXEMPTION FRQM,EXCISE TAX. The District is a municipal corporation with powers of emi~ery( dqil]ain. Thts. easement is granted for a public purpose. The District shall hold. Gratitor na.rmlEl.ssfroriJ the imposition or payment of any excise tax based upon the conveyarice of.this ea·semenf. f ·::, ··:, ... ,,,,.·•·' . ,. . ..... ' ,. -~- F:\0004\00107\0eslon\E'asements t23122\C1020_ Yoo-perm doc Page 3 of 5 09J_01104 ·:-.:, ... ~,, ....... ···' Easement No. 33-23-5-C1020 1r-/vvlTN~SS,WHEREOF, we have set our hands and seal this~ day of "'/ ,·1).Qr:rwd? of , 2004. /~ /10>ft:~i ·:·',l_/ PHILIP M;Y< Ej ./ ;\ / h./ STATE OF Wf\SH;f\JG~O.~} /' << COUNTY OF KING, .. ··· ./ss. ;i .. .. On this6l ,::!} day of &~ ei"7'.l ·· .. ' ...... , 2004,)' before me personally appeared PHILIP M. YEE and FANNYV. YEE, tq.me kri:0wrJ!6'oe the individuals described in and who executed the within and t9reg6ing in~frum1:1nf; ape! Eipknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and de\cl.d of sai,d Grantors/for_Jhe_µses.i=l,ndpurpo?'es therein mentioned/·,.., ·· ·.•. ·:, ... ·,,, / .:-" ./ ··-....·. ./ '•,,,,, ···~ ..... ,., _ _... .... ,,:. WITNESS my hahi;l and official seal hereto ~ifixelthh day cJ,nd'year-aboJe yJ~itti~- .,..--~~~t'.''•::'··· . Mu/-,~ ~:> /i/ i' ,,.,-~o ......... l",1, 11 ,1 NO~~RY PUBL}y)n and for the·$t~~~pf Wal;lliington f'<J~~~$SlON'2i:_;;f<:,\ , ........ Resrd1ng at: >ht?~ t:::'2-r~ w}f; .94' ~ • i o.:~OT il1yJ-~, ~,, .., ··1111y commission expires: Jo-9-09 ! ~ ~<. ...... ~ ..... ,·(/Ji .,/f ./:;' ,; <1> \ Pveuc ., i i} ,r,~. ·.. .•.s;,· ? -,;'1,.·•, To ·::,. ~1 ;::.,10 :.': ,, ,:,.. ... -~-rl' .. ~· "'' -. ,, ,·o .... -; ...... "t'--" .: .. .. '•, I" Vi/AS'<•''., .. -'t \\.,~\. 't.'I.'"-'\,~.,;,;,, F:\0004\001 07\0eslgn\Euamonta t23t22'C1020_ YH-po,mdoc Page 4 of 5 5 0050 ,_ ___ ...,._...., .,..,,,_,.!" ./(:;:: >0121/ 45' "ftMP . .boNsTl(• 'p~~MIT (JVP.)/ ,' 30' PER!f ES/,\T. JTYf). PERMIT NO. 33-23-5-C1020 0059 0080 0127 '. f RD,jj SE 190TH 1 1 { .(.PRIV_··.·. R_b_.·.·.:·)} I . J I I··/ LOT 4 I ~ I t_OT 3 ··,, · , 1 · q .. I ./ . ···.... 0186 I 0210 ::. g l\. !f'. rf_1b' .T~Mf'.. C.()· NST.R. : 0 ~ .( PERMIT y ( . BREVIK I N I ~~}l·. t r10<T£MP. / •• / 33;12032;'5 '1 6 l ~ u'~;;;c;T"f'~;~ ,~~, ,_,, :J I ~~~:~b~-----~ I ,,;f --', --/ll L~~ ; ; 1 / EASEMENT " I I 020;, ···. U 25' TEMP: j · II II . ··~ ... J 1s coNsTR. LOT 3 01 , ~~c -PERMIT o1ss ~1 1 I 't.J CONTRACT NO. 4-2004S. ULID NO. 107-S PERMit·Nb. 3~-23-~·C1020 F,0004\00107\LDD\DWG.ESMT PAGE 5 OF 5 Kerschke; Bill To: Cc: Subject: Brian: Norton, Brian Downing, Gary CA Fee Estimate: B04M2673 This appears to be a rather strait forward permit, however, there is an off-site wetland that may impact the location of the proposed structure. I believe that even if the structure is iri the wetland buffer, the proposal could be easily modified to accommodate the development. Consequently, I am giving a flat wetland fee of 579.60 or 4 hours. No additional CA information required at this time. Bill Kerschke Senior Ecologist/Env. Scientist III Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 206-296-7292 1 soc Page I of I !Development Condition Query Results = Parcel Search Parcel Number: 6199000126 Parcel Number: 6199000127 Listed below are both Post-Conversion and Pre-Conversion development conditions which are associated with the parcel you entered. To view text for a development condition, choose a condition code in either box below and click on a Get Text button. Otherwise click on 'New Query' at the bottom of this page to perform another parcel search. Post-Conversion Conditions Pre-Conversion Conditions (Effective August 18, 1997) (Prior to August 18, 1997) KCC-16.82.150D SCP-P17 I ' SC-P3 SCP-P3 I S0-220 SCP-P4 SCP-P7 I -. _.,_,.,•w-•, "•"-'""•-· ,."'"' .I ,1Jf&~'\,ir~~l,JI ~1,,,.,,,.,..,,:f,, .,~,.,, .. ,,., Et'~I1:Ti~I Updated: December 29, 1998 King Coun_1y I DOES Pag~ I DDES/GIS Page I New Query I News I Services I Comments I Search Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages. you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details Parcel Number. 6199000126 Taxpayer. YEE PHILIP M & FANNY y Annexation: NIA Jurisdiction: Unincorporated King County Situs Address: Postal City: Renton, 98058 Plat Name: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO. O Rec: nil Lot: 6; Block: NIA Kroll Page: 605 W Thomas Bros. Page: 686 114-S-T-R: SW-33-23-5 Acres: 0.48 (21018 SqFt.) Current Zoning: R-6-SO Potential Zoning: Comp. Plan Land Use: um Assessofs Open Space: NIA Commercial Use: NIA Number of Units: NIA Mobile Home: N Appraised Land Value: 20000 (2004), 20000 (2005) Appraised Improvements Value: 0 (2004), 0 (2005) -------- Community Plan Area: Soos Creek Unincorporated Area Council: NIA School District: Renton School District 403 Fire District: 40 Roads MPS Zone: 342 ($3765.00) Roads TCM Zone: 799 -Green (Under Threshold) Waterfront: Water Service: Water Service Planning Area: Soos Creek Water And Sewer District Sewer Service: Airport Noise Remedy Program: NIA Bald Eagle Flag: NIA Council District (1996-2001): 9 Kent Pullen (R) Council District (2002): 5 Dwight Pelz Drainage Basin: Soos Creek, WRIA 9 Police: King County, Pct: 3, Dist: F3 Service/Finance Strategy Area: Full Service Snowload Zone: Standard Agricultural Production District: N Forest Production District: N Rural Forest Focus Area: N IDRType: NIA IDR Status: NIA TOR Permit Number: NIA Building Inspection Area: S-4 Clearing Inspection Area: Jim Ballweber Code Enforcement Inspection Area: Sheryl Lux ESA Inspection Area: Kathy Newborn Grading Inspection Area: Ramon Locsin Land Use Inspection Area: Tenzing Thinley Parcel Number. 6199000127 Taxpayer. YEE PHILIP M & FANNY Y Annexation: NIA Jurisdiction: Unincorporated King County Situs Address: Postal City: Renton, 98058 ----------- Plat Name: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO. 0 Rec: nil Lot: 6; Block: NIA Kroll Page: 605 W Thomas Bros. Page: 686 114-S-T-R: SW-33-23-5 Acres: 0.48 (20917 SqFI.) --------- Current Zoning: R-6-SO Potential Zoning: Comp. Plan Land Use: um Assessofs Open Space: NIA CommercialUse:NIA Number of Units: NIA Mobile Home: N Appraised Land Value: 20000 (2004 ), 20000 (2005) Appraised Improvements Value: 0 (2004 ), 0 (2005) Community Plan Area: Soos Creek Unincorporated Area Council: NIA School District: Renton School District 403 Fire District: 40 Roads MPS Zone: 342 ($3765.00) Roads TCM Zone: 799 -Green (Under Threshold) Waterfront: Water Service: Water Service Planning Area: Soos Creek Water And Sewer District Sewer Service: Airport Noise Remedy Program: NIA Bald Eagle Flag: NIA Council District (1996-2001): 9 Kent Pullen (R) Council District (2002): 5 Dwight Pelz Drainage Basin: Soos Creek, WRIA 9 Police: King County, Pct: 3, Dist: F3 Service/Finance Strategy Area: Full Service Snowload Zone: Standard Agricultural Production District: N Forest Production District: N Rural Forest Focus Area: N IDRType:NIA IDR Status: NIA IDR Permit Number: NIA Building Inspection Area: S-4 Clearing Inspection Area: Jim Ballweber Code Enforcement Inspection Area: Sheryl Lux ESA Inspection Area: Kathy Newborn Grading Inspection Area: Ramon Locsin Land Use Inspection Area: Tenzing Thinley · BD03 KING COUNTY DEPT OF ASSESSMENTS BDOl PAI11260-Sl REAL PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS 11/08/04 10:36:18.3 ACCOUNT: 619900-0127-0 SITUS: TAXPAYER: LOT: 6 YEE PHILIP M & FANNY Y BLK: PLAT: QSTR: SW 33 23 05 NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO. 05 JURS: KING CO * L AN D ZONE ACTUAL JURISDICTION SQUARE FEET WAT.ER SYSTEM SEWER VIEW OPEN SPACE TIQELANDS D A T A * I I KING co II 20917 WTR DIST PRIVATE NO WATERFRONT FEET WFT LOCATION WFT BANK * * B U I L D I N G BLDG SQ FOOTAGE DATA FIRST FLOOR 1/2 FLOOR 2ND FLOOR UPPER FLOOR TOTAL BSMT FIN BSMT BSMT GARAGE TOTAL LIVING AREA ATTACHED GARAGE ROOMS D A T A * * BLDG MISC BLDG INFO YEAR BUILT #STORIES #LIVING UNITS DAYLIGHT BSMT HEAT SOURCE HEAT SYSTEM ACCESSORY IMPS POOL AREA POOL CONSTR DET GARAGE AREA CARPORT AREA WFT RIGHTS ONLY I BEDROOMS MOBILE HOME ================================================================= ( CHOOSE ONE OPTION: PRESS <PRINT> TO PRINT SCREEN, OF * * 0. 0) == <PF4> FOR LEGAL, <PF6> FOR HISTORY, <PF7> FOR TAXES OR <PF8> TO END. BD03 KING COUNTY DEPT OF ASSESSMENTS REAL PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION· ACCOUNT: 619900-0127-0 SITUS: TAXPAYER: YEE PHILIP M & FANNY Y LEGAL DESCRIPTION -PAGE 1 BD01 PAI11280-Sl 11/08/04 10:36:21.9 QSTR: SW 33 23 OS JURS: KING CO LOT 6 BLOCK NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRS DIV #5 AKA LOT C OF REVISED KC SHORT PLAT: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN.TRACTS DIV NO. 05 TRACT 6 LESS W 486 FT SUBD NO 07257 * END OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION* 0. 0) =================================================-===-=-==-=-=-==-=-=--------== CHOOSE ONE OPTION: PRESS <PRINT> TO PRINT SCREEN, <ENTER> FOR MORE LEGALS, <PF2> FOR CHARACTERISTICS, <PF6> FOR HISTORY, <PF7> FOR TAXES OR <PF8> TO END. BDOl KING COUNTY DEPT OF ASSESSMENTS BDOl PAI11260-Sl REAL PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS 11/08/04 10:34:50.0 ACCOUNT: 619900-0126-0 SITUS: TAXPAYER: YEE PHILIP M & FANNY Y QSTR: SW 33 23 05 LOT: 6 BLK: PLAT: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO. 05 * L AND DAT A ZONE ACTUAL JURISDICTION KING CO SQUARE FEET 21016 WATER SYSTEM WTR DIST SEWER PRIVATE VIEW NO OPEN SPACE TIDELANDS WATERFRONT FEET WFT LOCATION WFT BANK * I * * BUILDING I BLDG SQ FOOTAGE DATA I FIRST FLOOR I 1/2 FLOOR I 2ND FLOOR UPPER FLOOR TOTAL BSMT FIN BSMT BSMT GARAGE TOTAL LIVING AREA ATTACHED GARAGE I ROOMS JURS: KING co DA T A * * BLDG OF MISC BLDG INFO YEAR BUILT #STORIES #LIVING UNITS DAYLIGHT BSMT HEAT SOURCE HEAT SYSTEM ACCESSORY IMPS POOL AREA POOL CONSTR DET GARAGE AREA· CARPORT AREA WFT RIGHTS ONLY j BEDROOMS MOBILE HOME * * ================================================================= ( 0. 0) == CHOOSE ONE OPTION: PRESS <PRINT> TO PRINT SCREEN, <PF4> FOR LEGAL, <PF6> FOR HISTORY, <PF7> FOR TAXES BDOl KING COUNTY DEPT OF ASSESSMENTS REAL PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT: 619900-0126-0 SITUS: TAXPAYER: YEE PHILIP M & FANNY Y LEGAL DESCRIPTION -PAGE 1 OR <PF8> TO END. BDOl PAI11280-Sl 11/08/04 10:34:55.7 QSTR: SW 33 23 05 JURS: KING CO LOT 6 BLOCK NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRS DIV #5 AKA LOT B OF REVISED KC SHORT PLAT: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO. 05 E 143 FT OF W 486 FT OF TRACT 6 SUED NO 07257 * END OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION* 0. 0) --------------=-======--=--============================================---=--=- CHOOSE ONE OPTION: PRESS <PRINT> TO PRINT SCREEN, <ENTER> FOR MORE LEGALS, <PF2> FOR CHARACTERISTICS, <PF6> FOR HISTORY, <PF7> FOR TAXES OR <PF8> TO END. ' ,, "3'0, S/>.'.~~" .,., ..... -., .......... ,: ...... . - . ' !.~..: l " 0 , . ~ ,, -~ > .. 'i' :'-! ":- ' ~) -~ •, ·, ... -· ' .. , ' '• I ~.'.;; ' > --:: ' . .,. I :·) .-,"' ,_J •'1. I ':i :~ •, . J ' -.. I ' . ·" n 'I1 ~ I I : I I l c, ,, ,, '41 · ...... " .,, '~ :;, :,, •·. ". '~ ' •."':'--~ ~· ,, . ·~ j~ ~ ' ' ' ,A, -.. . --~-~.: ... -..... ~.. ·--- ~t!~t1i:{\1~XX1\ '.;}}::: .~·::;:<.; r--:;,,;'.·/{?J}:~}i?i;'(t~/; (~\)Jili<(}S~~1E:f f'.i}'tJ:; :\)t?.'}t:::~:> ~ i:~/f: /, :")::r::.,:_:i';:'. ·. :' ::~ ;:·:)_::.:·,: :f ;:_ .:··, './:: .; : ·:::: . ..::•'ftii~.:L;~f i:(f:1¥:t~~::; .t;••/, -: .... , .. _ .. ---i ,.f-:.,. •. , ..... :::s11;:;.,._, ·,_..;'(. ri ... , .. :._~o:.;:-,tt~:t;.-~;"Qei,-,\ .Jij~~~;,~~··:ij ··•,-'~'-~ t", e-.,.__ f·> t• ·._'_"'.} /.:· .... )~"liir.r~~L ~· ii :;Jr~~~/ ~- V" · .. ',>ll,i:_,,) Y{:W:~:::. 'i)?. '-. }y f, ·, -;"' ~· " _,,,, .{' //; .,. 1 cl, • -"' KING COUNT)T ENGINEER ' 1 , :~t~~t,~l So::,::·~:~;":,:: ";;;·04 SUBDIVISION AP P(ICATl9~l~f}{f{,,,11 A,' 2• S 9 ~ o_..,. . J EXT. 6 4 4 i!}'i\\':~\;)J . ·"' f4. ~ ---------_,;-·· ._._ .. , _ .. ·::/~[c._\(f(¥~~~ ,--, UCUUGl lONIO 1,,0, , v•a HC:. lwP. IGl,./.../ ~ _ '\·!,:::;: .. ,;_\~ 'A/V_t:!1,,z ::Ja"J&./4<"-, ? • ..;.. ?3 -;I""~..['£ ///-z,--/;. 2<:).;,m ,,,tN,, • Y.Z:.//1,,.'f!._,-UI. '/Ill'.•, /i'rd/ r',,lllt/r . ·--·, d7-4-"'=/r?d '°'itt;:··.~;-f,:• 1609 SOUTH Cf.NlAAL KENT, WASHINGTON 98031 NIIMllUI ...,,u,o f<"f:, N.wtli) -'f -:~~J~::'jf '"· 'l"J 0 ,. ~ , /r~ )' /~ 6 7: ..,..sf --) 6 of,. '!"1-',,. I t..J f:l/l4ly' TY - _...;._...;._.,-____ .J,~~:~ ,··t;.·_ ' ·:5.'.:/ -~. J:\' ~:-· ,'.,) ... :5~·if;.,it-:J wt• SCALE DRAWING OF PROPOSED ""°"' 10l"4 "°"''fVI S UIIDIVIS I ON SCALE USED: S. il~~,"ef' .Yee. R<!> v, set! l) p-4 WI t::J· ~' ,?;$, d ~-77 ~ /~- ~ QHln' '"' INtUW..t.HON IUIHl\"'D l't Mt I\ ttu, SIGNATURE i\.· .} . ,.•: ·._1·· ,;~ "/:~ ;. J •••• ~--.~~,,.:,,/) . -;;:~:~l~{\'. . :·>~::;i:-,- PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FIELD CHECKED "~ .... ,t"J, I. . ... 7 vr DATE t ... !. '' FINAL APPROVAL ' ATE DISAPPROVED IAI Ullol41 .)!';'"" .. CON.DITll:/REASONS C°*,_lyl-£c,1t1-"i ' ~ "· ,S' ~.I ~-, .,,,,. .I rl 44,,, ,w S0e tflf • . fS-111 d t -t ~ a.,..,, ~,,,,,;J, r . t,;;~ .. ,,_,;- \~;) i :;_: y· ·.)u~/.:;:['.t(;jf, . ·1 --$] J:j\~/,::\;;s: . .';' " ·-?'"'"'"•"'·'·' .,, .. c-f1£@!1,.., -·_}'.~)'.~}/;~?\!(i\vi.~t!~:~~!,IJ:O:' :., .. ·.'~~ .... ....r .• '._,,1;!a:..," ~'!.~-,f_id:t"', .. .. ..,, '·~'f ... ,...;....;~t·•·•~;, ,;,.:;,,._;;J.iJ.,:: , :}\;~li.c. r,.·. . ~,;·· .' !t L }· :I I r.• • lb ' l°' 1·.l 1::~ ; '.'_-•.. ~.~ 1f:r -.\ ., ~-~].Jt ' ~·. :, ,-... , . .. ,\< . :.-1 ~ ··----------,--------------- • • • • AgB ••••• ••• •••••••• •••••••••• •• AgC • • • • •• •••• • • • • • • • • • • • I • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • AmC • •• • • : ... ••• • • • • • • •• • •• • • • .. • •• • • • • • • • • • • • AgB • • •• : J-IAY£S • • " •••• • ·" • • • 11• • • ,:, • • • • • AgC •• • • • • • -• • • • • --!.• ---·AmC • • • • AgG ' \ 1~· R'Ur • • • • • AgB • • • \ \ \ \ \ ·1 I I ..1 I \ • 0 LOW C") (!) N -.. ~o o.~ "q" Cl o>-c:i:::c CJ ::, -fl) B a C I B"'lcllsit, a= ~ = :is-;-,w Hl8U -;: A04PM235 ZONING NT,. l SchoolllScllool Fadfflles ./VT~un. s-f.R ,',/QSUNES N.SEO.JNES ~NES N ~ -W-BOCIIS -Rl»d Rlgha,d-W,Y L..] Parollla ~p.- Ollel ~10. Agrlallknl, one DU par 10 aaes -A-35 • Agrlallknl, one OU par 36 aaes -F-Forell -M·Mlnnl RA-2.5 • Rini Ala. one DU par 5 aae1 RA-5 • Rini Nta, one OU par 5 8Cl8I -RA-10 ·Rini ...... one OU par 10 aae1 I.It -ut., AaNn4. one DO par 5 acres R-1 • R8lldlnllal, one DU par acre R_. • A9lidlnllal, 4 DU par acre R-3 -~.B DUparacre !Ml· Relidlnllal, 8 DU par acre R-12 • fWidlnllll. 12 DU par acre R-18 -Allldenlial, 18 DU par acre ia R-24 • Relidenllll, 2,4 DU par acre -R-48 • RMldenllll, 48 OU par acn t...: NB · NIUIIJolllOOd lku*8 -C8 -Conmnlvlku.a = RB . Algkr',al l!ulir.a 0 -0llioe I • klliall1al NOlyaa..-. 0 500 1000 1500 1-1 1-.1333feet ® King County n.---... --i.o-. ........ t,y ICll"9Ccu,ty--•V'""Y"'-·· ..... .. "-_....._ ~ec.ny-no --.. --.. ~-.. .. -.sy,........,.__.,..,. ...... ., --ICll"9Ccu,ly-nolba_lor.,,, _..opac111.-.-... --..._-._1uno1-1o,1oa-.. 1o11 ,,__ ...... _ .. _.,,,.._ -... -.... ,.,., .. ., .......... --..... ....,11~....,.11y-...-o1 OOurcy, • •• J / . . ' ~~--~-~-~-----------~ ---~ I -~ I ii !'t lu· I 0 ~ 1 i ,iiifi, i I LOI-J t 111ibt•i11 MO 8 § 1~11HibP J' NJ: ; ; ; I I I sfrJ ,,rl t ::E Cl. ~ t ® 111.f'lil!I I Cl. N ij~!lll~a ~o ~:::<~< D < 0 hlhlalib ~ ~~ .. i I l L04S0065 001 .jpg L04S0065 006 .jpg L04S0065 011 .jpg L04S0065 016 .jpg L04S0065 021 .Jpg !-~: ;~· .:,.,ll . ,·•}~ I ~I''. 4: ~ fl,'\;'! ·1 ~-~·. ,1 ,· '\ • • .• .. :.ii~ '., I l L04S0065 026 .jpg L04S0065 031 .jpg L04S0065 002.jpg L04S0065 007.Jpg L04S0065 012 .jpg L04S0065 017.Jpg L04S0065 022.Jpg L04S0065 027 .jpg L04S0065 032 .jpg L04S0065 003 .jpg L04S0065 004.jpg L04S0065 005 .jpg L04S0065 008.jpg L04S0065 009.jpg L04S0065 010 .jpg L04S0065 013.jpg L04S0065 014.jpg L04S0065 015.jpg L04S0065 018.Jpg L04S0065 019.jpg L04S0065 020.jpg L04S0065 023.jpg L04S0065 024 .jpg L04S0065 025 .Jpg L04S0065 028.jpg L04S0065 029.jpg L04S0065 030.jpg L04S0065 033.jpg L04S0065 034.Jpg L04S0065 035.jpg L04S0065 036.Jpg L0450065 037.jpg L04S0065 038.jpg L04S0065 039.jpg L04S0065 040 .jpg L04S0065 041 .jpg L04S0065 042.jpg .···~·:· ·.r ~) $2.65 EACH •FENCING:. . SOLID :woqD.CEDAR $2850 ·BERMING $17.50 IRRIGATION 80~. RE1.0CATH'1<J TREES 0~ SITE 36" DALI. .•. '$260.00 60." DALL .· '$920.00 RELOCATING'SHR.UBS ON SITll PER STAKE& LABOR 'L)}.W'Focif .. ·'iNCLl:IDES'LABOR' . LINEAR FOOT. INCLUDES LABOR ·sQUAREFOOt EACH F.ACH 01. i.o ~j ll-·-12_· _BA_L_L ___ -'----'-'""-'-'---l;:::··$~26:.;;.00.;;._ __ -I-EA'--' c...C;:::fl_. .;..;...-"----+-'-'--"" "---+-------II ::.; · 24' BALL ' S.n.oo EACH SUB TOTAL BOND AMOUNT Adil ·30% :of,the :\Jond Sul>'-Total for Contingen<-'Y in accordimce,with Financial'Guararitee'Ordinance·l2n220, Section 13. TOT AL BOND PRICE Revised LBQW 81291200 I BOND SUB TOT AL: W· ,L.LL ,,,,, S . .. . /.":I "l""1", V I 30'% CONTINGENCY: s G. I ;:3;,41 • • TOTAL BOND PRICE: sZ(p,c:;,7e .. % . . .'Independent Humpty Climber-metal climber-playground climber-affordable playground c ... Page I of2 Jlih landscape structures- HOME PRODUCTS VIDEO <;0,,L ..... PloM.ftGChoclOI" Ac-.l- &aMy c-~ FINIIICJng and ....,cl\u,ng 0-• .... _ ~andW•ranty i.-.. ngA.-..y • ABOUT US CONTACT US WHATSNE.W INTERACTIVE All the king's horses couldn't bring this much fun ~13cf13 Ounng outoeor play 11111 cunous ano -le play e\/9111 offers k1<11 fun MW directions to d1m1> Recommen<le<I for ages 5 to , 2 Ava,lal>la ,n s,ngle or doul>le hump Shapes ,n your choice of PllillOM»# ACiA«I 1 3• O D rungs welded to , 9" o D ga1van1zecl-stMI Side ,..,11 Our matenais maner• Learn more lll>out our top.quality IDIIIOIII. DooOle Hump1y Clime« MalOffllllTI fall hetgnt 88" (2 24 m ) Mm,mum area required 14' • 26' (4 27 m • 7 02 m) #100037 A • Double Hwnplty Climber (thown .i left) 308 IM • Single Humpcy Chmbef Max,mum fall height ae· (2 24 m) Min.mum area r9qu,rec 14 • HI· 10" (4 27 m • 5 13 m) #1000378 • Slngle Humplty Climber (llllown Mlow) 164 IM. Single Humpty Cllml>er !.,08 ~[OSI ':The TuffR.iders Motorcycle is commercial playground equipment for outdoor play fun an... Page 1 of2 Jllvi landscape structures· HOME PRODUCTS PLANNING ABOUT US CONTACT US WHArSNEW Motorcycle with Coll Spring (shown at let) #100013A • Surfac.e Mount 64 lbs. #1000138 . Direct Bury 83 lbs. Motorcycle with Torsion Spring #157286A • Surface Mount 68 lbs. #1572868 • Direct Bury 87 lbs. Motorcycle Back Support Available with or without a seat strap (seat strap not IPEMA"' certified ) hnp://www.playlsi.com/Products/lndependents/KidslnMotionffuflRiders/Motorcycle/ 12/9/2008 C200 6 l ano,;cape Structure• Inc All Rights Reserved http://www.playlsi.com/Products/Accessories/SiteAmenities/PolyPicnicTable/ 12/9/2008 ·:Poi y Picnic Tabl e-recycled-Landscape Stru ctures Ji0i landscape structures· Page 1 of 2 SJla...D::IIIR or Search our 11118bsrte for §] HOME PRODUCTS PLANNING ABOUT us CONTACT us WHArs NEW INTERACTIVE Products· "'cce~t~ c:;,,,. Arnen r,~. P"IV P r;n c Tabe A great place for lunch time or snacks FIND YOUR RE PI 1 of 11 Extra-thick, recycled polyethylene planks look like wood but are longer- lasting and easier to keep clean , while the specially curved edges are easy on arms and legs Available in a variety of permanent or moveable configurations to accomodate wheelchair access Made w ith 2-1/2" 100 percent post-consumer, UV-stabilized polyethylene seats and tops Features galvanized-steel- tub ing frame Ch oose any powdercoat @Lor fo r frame #113139A-L C20C& Landscape Structure! Inc A II Rights Reserved http ://www.play ls i.com/Product s/Acce sso ri es/SiteAmenities/Poly Pi c nicTable/ 12/9/2008 ~ · Colltour Series Bench-park bench-playground bench-recycled bench -Landscape Structures Page I of 2 Jlih landscape structures· Sl1a..mlll or Search our website for. §] HOME PRODUCTS PLANNING ABOUT us CONTACT us WHArs NEW INTERACTIVE Prooucts. Accenr5. S,te Arren • "S COt'V'> • Serie<, S,,ncn icontour Series Bench 0 t A comfortable place to watch kids in action FIND YOUR REPI 11 of 11 These 2-1/2"-thick recycled polyethylene planks look like wood , but last much longer and are easier to clean Comfortable curved edges a re easy on legs and arms Features galvanized-steel frame in any QQWdercoat color Available in 60" or 96" lengths, w ith or without a back #111640A-H No-back option C\2008 Lanascape Structures inc All R,gntt. Reservea http://www. play lsi .com/Products/ Accessories/SiteAmenities/ContourSeriesBench/ 12/9/2008 , · :Abbotsforo Con cr ete -Texada HydraPressed Interlocking Paver, HydraPressed Slabs Garden WallSeapes Ret.ted Products Technical Downloads Installation Guides Photo Gallery FAQs About ACP ICPI Certified Installers AquaPave Insullers Brochures Wortc.hops • seminars Texada HydraPressed Slabs The Texada with its light shot-blast finish , provides a smooth non-skid surface. This slab can be used with any of our other slab styles to create a very unique look. More Information . Texada Colors Patterns http ://www.pavi ngsto nes.com/texada .htrn Mouse over thumbnails to view a larger ,mage. Yla1t gwr..rt,qtp AAll«Y to ld«W mont Im- Standard sizes: • 24 "x24"x2" (610mmx610mmx50mm) • 24 "x12"x2" (610mmx30Smmx50mm) • l8"x1S"xl-5/8 " (457mmx457mmx40mm) Cut to size: • 18 "x9 "xl-5/8" (457mmx229mmx40mm) • 12"xl2"x2 " (JOSmmxJOSm m xSOmm) • 9 "x9"xl-5/8" (229mmx229mmx40mm) 12/11 /2008 Denis Law Mayor December 1, 2009 Heidi Kuehnlenz & Anthony Ford 413 S 47th Street Renton, IJ{A 98055 Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator SUBJECT: TRANSFER OF LAND USE FILES FROM KING COUNTY TO CITY OF RENTON (HITONE [AKA: YEE] SHORT PLAT, KC FILE L04S0065, LUA09-122) Dear Fanny & Phillip Yee, We have received files from King County for your project application the Hitone Short Plat (King County File No. L0450065). The project is now assigned the City of Renton File No: LUA09-122 . City of Renton has assigned a Planner and an Engineering Plan Reviewer to your project. You will be working with Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner, and Jan Illian, Plan ·Reviewer. Rocale may be reached by calling: 425.430.7219, and Jan may be reached by calling: 425 .430.7299. Please contact Rocale Timmons to set up a meeting to discuss your project c!nd next steps . Please be advised that the City of Renton will continue to bill you based on the King County billing -rate of $140/hour. King County provided only one copy of the file, therefore, Staff may request that you provide additional copies of application materials so that the project can be processed. We appreciate your patience as we process the multiple files transmitted to City of Renton by the County. C. E. "Chip'.' Vincent, Planning Director cc : Jennifer Henning, Plann ing Manager Kayren Kittrick, Engineering Plan Review Superv isor Roca le Timmons, Associate Planner Jan Illian, Plan Review Renton City Hall ~ 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Wa shington 98057. • rentonwa.gov J ~ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www .metrokc.gov January 8, 2009 Steve Terrell 923 Northwest 50th Street Seattle, WA 98107 RE: Recreation Plan, KC File L08MI051 Hitone Short Subdivision, L04S0065 Dear Mr. Terrell: I have reviewed the revised recreation and landscaping plan received December 17, 2008. With the additional toy structures and picnic area, the grass paved area will be acceptable as an addition to the recreation space. The proposed plan (pages Ll & L2) meets the conditions of the short plat preliminary approval as well as code requirements for a recreation facility (KCC21A 14) and landscaping (KC 21A.° 16). I hereby approve the plan with the following conaitions. This approval is only for the recreation tract. The street tree in the cul-de-sac circle will be reviewed by the Land Use Inspection Section as part of the street tree review. The following are my recommended conditions of approval for the recreation/landscaping plan: 1. The access manhole cover shall be at the ground level and should not pose any safety issue. This shall be inspected and approved by the King County Inspection staff. 2 . The grass pavers shall be installed tightly to provide a continuous grassy area for play and leisure. The grass pavers, grass area and landscaping shall be kept healthy and thriving through the final inspection and at the time the performance bond is released. 3. The equipment (play structures, bench, and picnic table) shall meet at a minimum, Consumer Product Safety Standards and be appropriately anchored. The play area surface shall be of material suitable to play on and shall meet consumer safety standards. 4. The landscaping and recreation space improvements (i.e. play structures, equipment, landscaping materials, irrigation system) must be installed and .. ... , inspected, or a performance bond posted, prior to plat recording. The amount of the performance bond has been established at$ 26,578 .00 for the recreation tract improvements. This includes the required 30% contingency amount. The BQW and the toy structure specifications are attached to the approved plan. An inspection fee is also due prior to recording. This fee covers the cost of inspections. The amount of the inspection deposit will be determined by the Land Use Inspection Section (LUIS). If a performance financial guarantee is posted, the improvements must be installed within two years from the date of recording. The Land Use Services Division will conduct an inspection one year after the recording date. The applicant may request in writing an earlier inspection date if the improvements are fully installed prior to the one year anniversary of recording. Enclosed is a copy of the approved plans for your records. If you have any questions, please call me at (206) 296-7173 . If you have questions regarding the financial guarantee please contact Finance billing hotline at (206) 296- 6659 . Questions regarding the inspection process may be directed to the Land Use Inspection Section (206) 296-6642. Sincerely, ~ •• & w._ r;~~ · Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Current Planning Section, LUSD Attachment Cc: Antony Ford, Applicant, w/enc Steve Townsend, Supervising Engineer, Land Use Inspection Section, w /enc Kim Claussen, Planner ill, Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division Joanne Carlson, ASII, Engineering Review Section, LUSD, w/enc Carol Rogers , FIGMU, w/enc, BQW only L04S0065 File tQ KingCounty Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057 -5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov November 20, 2008 Steven Wade Terrell Terrell Design Group 923 NW 50th Street Seattle, WA 98107 RE: Recreation Plan, KC File L08MI051 Hitone (a.k.a Yee) Short Subdivision KC Files L04S0065 Dear Mr. Terrell: I have reviewed the recreation and landscaping plan dated July 24, 2008 and have the following comments: 1. Please show the dimensions and area calculation for the combined drainage and recreation tract. Please note that at a minimum, 2,340 square feet shall be allocated for recreation . The grass-paved driveway to access the drainage vault cannot be included within the required area. The area allocated for recreation could include landscapin g buffers. No dimension of the recreation tract can be less than 30 feet. 2. At a minimum a 400-square-foot tot lot area must be provided . The proposed 215-foot toddler area (sand box) is inadequate and does not meet the code. In addition to the tot lot area, one additional recreation facility must be provided per KCC 21A.14.180.E2. A pull bar as the only recreation structure does not meet the code requirement. A basketball court or a picnic area with tables and a large grassy area for throwing a baseball or Frisbee may be acceptable for a recreation facility. 3. Please show fencing around the entire perimeter of the tract except the street side. The fencing along the boundary of the tract and Lot 6 may be 4-feet high and see-through. 4 . Landscaping notes must include the type and method of irrigation. 5 . The proposed improvements must not conflict with the engineering requirements for the drainage facility or its maintenance. Normal maintenance includes driving heavy equipment up to the access point, opening vault access points and lowering equipment into the vault to remove sediments. Please show the vault access points for maintenance and any other drainage related structures that will be part of the recreation tract. Please submit the following by December 22, 2008: 1. 5 copies of a revised final recreation plan, addressing the items referred above 2 . 5 copies of a revised Bound Quantity Worksheet for the landscaping and other improvements 3. 5 copies of play equipment and recreation tract furnishings specifications 4. A copy of this memo If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, '-+-~?~ Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Current Planning Section Cc: Antony Ford, Applicant Lanny Henoch, Project Manager III Angelica Velasquez, PPM II Mazan Haidar, Engineer, Engineering Review Section L07SRO 19 File e e LANDSCAPE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET FORM Bonds are based upon required landscaping only and wlU be posted for pcrfonnanoe and/or maintenance. Required landscaping lncludes perimeter landscaping, surface parlcins area landscaping, (KCC 21 A.16) and any landscaping required by SEPA c:nvironmeotal rc~icw. The m1intenancc period i5 (or the life of the project, however, alter posting for mai ntenance, the performanoe bond wiU be reduced to 30% (S 1.000.00 minimum) and be held for a two year period . Upon re-inspection of the site the bond will be released iftbe site ht\s been properly maintained (21Al6.180). A landscape maintenance inspection deposit oU316.80 is required prior to permit lssu.anee to cover th.e costs of the 2-year maintenance inspection. Landscape inspections are bllled at the current hourly rate once the Initial deposit 1, exhausted. If the project has not been maintained and there are dead trees. shrubs. ground cover, or other deticioocies noted in the required landscapin g. the bond will Ix: held until th e deficiencie s arc com:cti:d . L .. I' ., ,. ;,;.;,:1,, ·.va ... ' . . ',.; i{~ ,,,,i;~'.,~ C '•'-1!'.' ~'.., o < ',._·,::: UNlT )!RICE ~TYPE QUANTITY ., PRICE ! SOD LAWN AREAS S500.00 MSF (1000 SQ. f1) 4/r· HYDROS EEO ING $50 .00 MSF (1000 SQ. FT) V>0'1 ipf ,ob.#i SOIL PREPARAT(ON A. TOPSOIL (6 lNCHES DEEP) $25.00 CY (CUB IC YARD) ~7 ctzs, ~ B. MULCH (2 INCHES DEEP) $4 .00 SY (SQUARE YARD) ~i \ l 2.. ' {)0 C. PEA TMOSS (TWO INCHES DBEP) $2.30 SY (SQUARE YA.RD) ,&- D. COMPOST (3 l},JCHES DEiEP & TUL INO $26.00 SY (SQUARE YARD) ,R- E. FERTILIZER $6 .67 CY {CUBIC YARD) ,7 Z4ti. 7q - PLANT MATERIALS .. A DECIDUOUS TREES l.1S • 2.00" CALIPER (minimum height 10') $250.00 EACH COST&LABOR PE'RJMETER & PARK.ING AREAS l.5 -1.75" CALIPER S22S.OO EACH COST&LABOR 3 h75 . Q~ l!il'ltltlOI. U..WSCAl'l.'IO ~ OTl'CEll lEQUIUD I.AHl>SCArlNO D. EVERGREEN TREES FIVE (5) FEET OR ABOVE SJSO .OOEACH COST&LABOR "8-. C. SHRUBS $35 .00EACH COST&LABOR ~ 2., lOO, oc BOND AMOUNT SUB TOT AL: SUB TOTAL BOND AMOUNT $ 4, ( :ft , tit ,.... ~,, ('\ j .... , \ ,..., : V u ''--' ' PAGE 1 OF2 .. .. ... . .. ,, ;; .'• UNITPRICE UNITTYPE ' QUANTITY PRICE - • GROUND COVER $4 .00 EACH COST&LABOR \? {t(),Of> MISCELLANEOUS : TREE STAKES $2.65 EACH PER ST AKE&. ,• LABOR ? 1B 5 • .. FENCING : LINEARFOOT 4? /;f 2., ~c;o. ~v SOLID WOOD CEDAR $28 ,50 fNCLUDES LABOR . . I BERMrNG $17.50 LINEAR.FOOT e--INCLUDES LABOR IRRJOATION 80t SQUARE FOOT t7~~ uvv I L (p()1. 7,o RELOCA TINO TREES ON SITE 36" DALL $260.00 EACH ~ 60"BALL $920.00 EACH r RELOCATING SHRUBS ON SITE ~- 12" BAU. $26.00 EACH .e- 24" BALL $33.00 EACFf ,GI: ADDITIONAL lTEMS ~A:'1 ~vlP H 9')-r ~~LAM-To1A.\... ':3>, 3 ~?,""' l 1o"J"'A\;., ~~.r~~.~~":e*rAvt. £ ~~ ~~L..A~ S, ?76 . 0 " SUB TOTAL BOND AMOUNT BOND SUB TOTAL: s UJtk#.~ Add 30% of the Bond Sub-Total for Contingency in :acoordance with 30 % CONTINGENCY: Financial Guarantee Ordinance 120220, Section 13. sJ, 133,47 TOT AL BOND PRICE TOTAL BOND PRICE: s Zt;,,r:;1&, % .. Revised LBQW &/29/200 I • -----------------, ---tQ LANDSCAPE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET FORM King County KTNGCOUNTY PROJECT NAME: r1 , 1 tvl t, ~ J-e Dept. of Dcvelopmem and Enviromnemal Services DDES PROJECT#: L. C)'(; M !. 0? ( JAN O 1 e e 900 Oakesdale Avenue: South~ Renton, WA 9805S-1219 206/296-6600 ADDRESS: \io iei s~ 140~ 'f\~~ ~4-t>~. ~Ntf&fEi~vtCE~ PREPARED BY : $t9'Jt,,:f"~-,t,~ PHONE: ~'l)t-5.t ~..,- Bonds an: based upon required landscaping only and will be posted for perfonnance and/or maintenMce. Required landscaping includes perimeter IMdseaping. surface parking area landscaping, (KCC 21 A.16) iuid any landscaping required by SEPA t:nvironmcutal review. The maintenance period ~ (or the life of the project, ho\\evtr, after posting for maintenance. the performance bond "'ill be reduced to 30% (S 1.000.00 minimum) and be held for a two year period. Upon re-inspection of the site the bond will be rcleu..~ if the site has been properly maintained (21 A 16.180). A landscape maintenance inspection deposit or $316.80 Is required prior to permit iuutnce to cover the costs or the ?-year maintenance inspection. La_ndscape inspections are billed at the current hourly rate once the Initial deposit Is exhausted. If the project has not bten maintained and there are dead uteS. shrub:>. grounJ cover, or other dcficicnciC:! notod in the required landscaping, lhe bond wiU be held until the d~fici~ncics are corrected . UNITPRICE UNIT TYPE QUANTITY PRICE SOD LAWN AREAS $500.00 MSF (I 000 SQ. Ff) Q' HYDROSEEDING $50.00 MSF { I 000 SQ. FT) UJo1 <pf ,oo.~ SOIL PREPARATION A. TOPSOIL (6 INCHES DEEP) $25 .00 CY (CUBIC YARD) ~7 CfZtS,"° B. MULCH (2 INCHES DEEP) $4.00 SY (SQUARE YARD) z.e \ \ 2. , of; C. PEAT MOSS (TWO INCHES DEEP) $2.30 SY (SQUARE YARD) ,&- 0 . COMPOST (3 INCHES DEEP & TILLING $26.00 SY (SQUARE Y /\RD) ~ E. FERTILIZER $6.67 CY (CUBIC YARD) ?7 z~. 1t:t PLANT MATERIALS A. DECIDUOUS TREES 1.75-2.00" CALCPER (minimum height 10') ruo.OOEACH COST&LABOR PERIMETER& PARKING AREAS 1.5 • 1.75" CALIPER $225.00 EACH COST&LABOR ~ b75, Q~ li'l'ITIOOll l.ANl>I\CAl'tl/0 OIi <mlf:a 11/i(jOlll'.I) I.A~ANNO D.EVERGREENTREES FIVE (5) FEET OR ABOVP. S 150.00 EACH COST &. LABOR -8" . C. SHR UGS $35.00EACH COST&LABOR (/;)() 2., tuo , o BOND AMOUNT SUB TOT AL: SUB TOTAL BOND AMOUNT s 4,(o/t I ?,A; ~I .. , I ('\ ---\ I I ~, :v v I ~· ' PAGE 10F2 UNITPRICE UNIT TYPE QUANTITY PRICE • GROUND COVER $4 .00 l::ACH COST&LABOR \Si {tf),00 ....... MISCELLANEOUS . , Ii TREE ~'TAKES $2.65EACH PER STAKE& ? 7:15 LABOR FENCING : LINEAR FOOT 4?~f. 2.,~c;o .c;u SOLID WOOD CED AR $28 .SO rNCLUDES LABOR BERMrNG $17.50 LINEAR FOOT e--INCLUDES LABOR IRRJOAT ION so, SQUA RE FOOT 'lbOq L CJ>o1. io RELOCATING TREES ON SITE 36" DALJ. $260.00 EACH -tr 60"BALL $920 .00 EACH e- RELOCATING SHRUBS ON SITE -., 12" BALL $26.00 EACll R- 24" BALL $33 .00 EACH .(?" ,;;..., ADDITIONAL ITEMS ft...A'< €-Qvlf M 9J,-lt11,,-.; t.:Jrtw.. To,A.\..-~, 36~, ()() I ~~C-H, fA:~.~ ~e PA.tit, ~ ~'11='..~ c.osr ~ L-A&J ~ 'To-rAL, e, ?76 . OCJ SUB TOTAL BOND AMOUNT BOND SUB TOT AL: s W ,4-4*.~ Add 30o/o of the Bond Sub-Total for Contingency in accordance with 30 % CONTINGENCY: Financial Guarantee Ordinance 120220, Section 13. s G. t33,4Z j TOT AL BOND PRICE TOT AL BOND PRICE: s Zft,l '516, % • Revised LBQW 8129/2001 • ' ~ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206 -296-7217 www .metrokc.gov January 8, 2009 Steve Terrell 923 Northwest 501h Street Seattle, WA 98107 RE: Recreation Plan, KC File L08Ml051 Hitone Short Subdivision, L04S0065 Dear Mr. Terrell: I have reviewed the revised recreation and landscaping plan received December 17, 2008 . With the additional toy structures and picnic area, the grass paved area will be acceptable as an addition to the recreation space. The proposed plan (pages Ll & L2) meets the conditions of the short plat preliminary approval as well as code requirements for a recreation facility (K.CC21A 14) and landscaping (KC 21A. 16). I hereby approve the plan with the following conciitions. This approval is only for the recreation tract. The street tree in the cul-de-sac circle will be reviewed by the Land Use Inspection Section as part of the street tree review. The following are my recommended conditions of approval for the recreation/landscaping plan: 1. The access manhole cover shall be at the ground level and should not pose any safety issue. This shall be inspected and approved by the King County Inspection staff. 2 . The grass pavers shall be installed tightly to provide a continuous grassy area for play and leisure. The grass pavers, grass area and landscaping shall be kept healthy and thriving through the final inspection and at the time the performance bond is released. 3. The equipment (play structures, bench, and picnic table) shall meet at a minimum, Consumer Product Safety Standards and be appropriately anchored. The play area surface shall be of material suitable to play on and shall meet consumer safety standards. 4. The landscaping and recreation space improvements (i.e. play structures, equipment, landscaping materials, irrigation system) must be installed and • inspected, or a performance bond posted, prior to plat recording. The amount of the performance bond has been established at$ 26,578.00 for the recreation tract improvements. This includes the required 30% contingency amount. The BQW and the toy structure specifications are attached to the approved plan. An inspection fee is also due prior to recording. This fee covers the cost of inspections. The amount of the inspection deposit will be determined by the Land Use Inspection Section (LUIS). If a performance financial guarantee is posted, the improvements must be installed within two years from the date of recording. The Land Use Services Division will conduct an inspection one year after the recording date. The applicant may request in writing an earlier inspection date if the improvements are fully installed prior to the one year anniversary of recording. Enclosed is a copy of the approved plans for your records. If you have any questions, please call me at (206) 296-7173. If you have questions regarding the financial guarantee please contact Finance billing hotline at (206) 296- 6659. Questions regarding the inspection process may be directed to the Land Use Inspection Section (206) 296-6642. Sincerely, Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Current Planning Section, LUSD Attachment Cc: Antony Ford, Applicant, w/enc Steve Townsend, Sµpervising Engineer, Land Use Inspection Section, w /enc Kim Claussen, Planner III, Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division Joanne Carlson, ASII, Engineering Review Section, LUSD, w/enc Carol Rogers, FIGMU, w /enc, BQW only · L04S0065 File -Pre-Apl ~tion Meeting Request Form ® Please indicate if Pre-Application is : King County DVoluntary J(i Mandatory nr~.. ·· ·-Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Pre-Aoolication Number: Renton , Washington 98055-1219 Yee Short Plat Applicant Name: Fanny Y. & Philip M. Yee Address c/o Lang Associates, Inc 10658 Riviera Pl. NE Seattle, WA 98125 Attn : De-En Lan Date: October 21, 2004 Phone: FAX: Project Description : The development of a 6 lot single-family short subdivision on 0.96 (41 ,935 sq- ft acres of R-8 zoned land. The · would have ublic sewer water and rivate streets. Parcel No. s : 6199000126 & 6199000127 All pre-application request submittal of an agenda, drawings project document and indication of issues to be discussed (check applicable boxes below} Please submit enough copies of the agenda , drawings and documents for each person requested to attend the meeting , along with two additional copies. Check the box(es) regarding issues you wish to discuss : D Building Issues: Building/mechanical (HVAC)/Energy/Barrier-Free D Fire Issues: UFC/Fireflow/access/Sprinkler/Alarms/Hazardous Material Jc{ Site Issues: Drainage/Site Development Project east of subject site L04P0002 )a Site Issues: Traffic/Road Access/Road Improvement/Parking Layout Private street proposed D Site Issues: Zoning/Landscape/Parking CounUSubdivision Design D SAO/GEO Issues: Landslide/Seismic/Coal Mine/Erosion D SAO/Wetland Issues: Stream/Wetlands/Flood Plains D Grading Issues: Grading/Site Development D SEPA Issues: Environment Concerns/Check LisUOff-Site Improvements D Health Issues: Sewer/Septic/Water/Fixtures/Water Fountains D Other (Specify) Please complete the next page of this form to indicate the numbers and types of representatives that will be at the pre-application meeting from your design team . Meetreq Denis Law Mayor December 1, 2009 Heidi Kuehnlenz & Anthony Ford 413 S 4 7th Street Renton, \NA 98055 . Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch,Administrator SUBJECT: TRANSFER OF LAND USE FILES FROM KING COUNTY TO CITY OF RENTON {HITONE [AKA: YEE] SHORT PLAT, KC FILE l0450065, LUA09-122) Dear Fanny & Phillip Yee, · We have received files from King County for your project application the Hitone Short Plat (King County File No. L04S0065). The project is now assigned the City of Renton File No:· LUA09-122. City of Renton has assigned a Planner and an Engineering Plan Reviewer to your project You will be working with Rocale Timmons; A~sociate Planner, and Jan Illian, Plan ·Reviewer. Roca le may be reached by calling: 425.430.7219, and Jan may be.reached by calling: 425.430.7299. Please contact Rocale Timmons to set up a meeting to discuss your project and next steps. Please be advised that the City of Renton wili" continue to bill you based· on the King County billing rate of $140/hour. King County provided only one copy of the file, therefore, Staff may request that you provide additional copies of application materials so that the ·project can be processed. We appreciate your patience as we process the multiple files transmitte_d to City of Renton by the County. _ Sinc:rely, J \ -" e.~-\.,-~ C. E. "Chip'.' Vincent, Planning Director cc: Jennifer Henning, Planning Manager . Kayren Kittrick, Engi"neering Plan RevreW SuperviSor R0cale TimmOns;. Associate Planner . Jan lll_ian, Plan Review Renton City Hall. ~ 1 o.ss South Gr:ady Way o_ Renton, Washington 98057: o rentonwa.gov tQ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov January 8, 2009 Steve Terrell 923 Northwest 501h Street Seattle, WA 98107 RE: Recreation Plan. KC File L08MI0S1 Hitone Short Subdivision, L04S0065 Dear Mr. Terrell: I have reviewed the revised recreation and landscaping plan received December 17, 2008. With the additional toy structures and picnic area, the grass paved area will be acceptable as an addition to the recreation space. The proposed plan (pages LI & L2) meets the conditions of the short plat preliminary approval as well as code requirements for a recreation facility (KCC2 IA 14) and landscaping (KC ZIA. 16). I hereby approve the plan with the following conoitions. This approval is only for the recreation tract. The street tree in the cul-de-sac circle will be reviewed by the Land Use Inspection Section as part of the street tree review. The following are my recommended conditions of approval for the recreation/landscaping plan: I. The access manhole cover shall be at the ground level and should not pose any safety issue. This shall be inspected and approved by the King County Inspection staff. 2. The grass pavers shall be installed tightly to provide a continuous grassy area for play and leisure. The grass pavers, grass area and landscaping shall be kept healthy and thriving through the final inspection and at the time the performance bond is released. 3. The equipment (play structures, bench, and picnic table) shall i:neet at a minimum, Consumer Product Safety Standards and be appropriately anchored. The play area surface shall be of material suitable to play on and shall meet consumer safety standards. 4. The landscaping and recreation space improvements (i.e. play structures, equipment, landscaping materials, irrigation system) must be installed and .. inspected, or a performance bond posted, prior to plat recording. The amount of the performance bond has been established at $ 26,578.00 for the recreation tract improvements. This includes the required 30% contingency amount. The BQW and the toy structure specifications are attached to the approved plan. An inspection fee is also due prior to recording. This fee covers the cost of inspections. The amount of the inspection deposit will be determined by the Land Use Inspection , Section (LUIS). If a performance financial guarantee is posted, the improvements must be installed within two years from the date of recording. The Land Use Services Division will conduct an inspection one year after the recording date. The applicant may request in writing an earlier inspection date if the improvements are fully installed prior to the one year anniversary of recording. Enclosed is a copy of the approved plans for your records. If you have any questions, please call me at (206) 296-7173. If you have questions regarding the financial guarantee please contact Finance billing hotline at (206) 296- 6659. Questions regarding the inspection process may be directed to the Land Use Inspection Section (206) 296-6642. Sincerely, Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Current Planning Section, LUSD Attachment Cc: Antony Ford, Applicant, w/enc Steve Townsend, Supervising Engineer, Land Use Inspection Section, w /enc Kim Claussen, Planner III, Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division Joanne Carlson, ASH, Engineering Review Section, LUSD, w/enc Carol Rogers, FIGMU, w/enc, BQW only L04S0065 File ' '. •' \ ti King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 · 206-296-6600 TW·206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov November 20, 2008. Steven Wade Terrell Terrell Design Group 923 NW 50'h Street Seattle, WA 98107 RE: Recreation Plan, KC File L08MI051 Hitone (a.k.a Yee) Short Subdivision KC Files L04S0065 Dear Mr. Terrell: I have reviewed the recreation and landscaping plan dated July 24, 2008 and have the following comments: I. Please show the dimensions and area calculation for the combined drainage and recreation tract. Please note that at a minimum, 2,340 square feet shall be allocated for recreation. The grass-paved driveway to access the drainage vault cannot be included within the required area. The area allocated for recreation could include landscaping buffers. No dimension of the recreation tract can be less than 30 feet. 2. At a minimum a 400-square-foot tot lot area must be provided. The proposed 215-foot toddler area (sand box) is inadequate and does not meet the code. In addition to the tot lot area, one additional recreation facility must be provided per KCC 21A.14.180.E2. A pull bar as the only recreation structure does not meet the code requirement. A basketball court or a picnic area with tables and a large grassy area for throwing a baseball or Frisbee may be acceptable for a recreation facility. 3. Please show fencing around the entire perimeter of the tract except the street side. The fencing along the boundary of the tract and Lot 6 may be 4-feet high and see-through. 4. Landscaping notes must include the type and method of irrigation. 5. The proposed improvements must not conflict with the engineering requirements for the drainage facility or its maintenance. Normal maintenance includes \ driving heavy equipment up to the access point, opening vault access points and lowering equipment into the vault to remove sediments. Please show the vault access points for maintenance and any other drainage related structures that will be part of the recreation tract. Please submit the following by December 22, 2008: I. . 2. 3. 4. 5 copies ofa revised final recreation plan, addressing the-items referred-above 5 copies of a revised Bound Quantity Worksheet for the landscaping and other improvements 5 copies of play equipment and recreation tract furnishings specifications A copy of this memo If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, '-::t--~\?~. Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Current Planning Section Cc: Antony Ford, Applicant Lanny Henoch, Project Manager III Angelica Velasquez, PPM II Mazan Haidar, Engineer, Engineering Review Section L07SRO 19 File I •· ·-• ', •• ., ' .:;;;_~~~, .. ,~_. ~-'~-_·./ii: ·~. . ·,·. --~·--' -·.. . ' - KingCounty . KINGCOUNTY 0:.t>epL of Dcvelopmem and Enviromneinal Services 900 Oalresdaic A venue Soulhw,:,;t Renton, WA 98055-!219 206/296-6600 Bonds an: based upon required landscaping only and will be posted for -peribnnance and/or malntenwice._ Requlrc'd landscaping Includes perimeter lnndscnping. surface parking_aren landscaping, (KCC-2IA.16) and any landi;caping:rcquircd by-SEPA eti~·ironmeutal re\'iCW. The maintenance ptriod i~ for the life of the_·projttt,·however~-aftcr·posting for maintenance. th'e·perfonnance·bond Vtill be reduced to-30o/o{S1,QOO.OO minimum) and be held for 11 two year period. Upon re-inspection of the site the bond will be released if the site bns been properly maintained (21A.16.180). A landscape mainten2nee inspection deposit of $316.80 is required prior to permit-iSSusnce to eo,•er.the ·costs of the 2 .. year maintenance inspedion. Landc.C:1.pe inspections arc billed at the current.hourly rate once the Initial deposit Is exhausted. If the project has not been maintained end there are dead trees. shrubs. ground cover, or other dcficitnci~ noted in the required. landscaping..th,e h9n<! will be,hcld until lhe·deficicncic:s W}: corrected. SOD LAWN AREAS $500.00 HYDROSEEOING $50.00 SOJL PREPARATION A. TOPSOIL (6 INCHES DEEP) S2S:OO B. MULCH (21NCHES DEEP) $4.00 O· C. PEAT MOSS (TWO INCHESDEEP) · $2:30 D. COMPOST (J INCHES DF.EP &TILLING . : S26:00 E, FERTILIZER •$6.67 • PLANT MATERIALS A. .DECIDUOUS. TREES l.7S -2.00· CAEll'ER'(minilnuni h~lghMO') S2SO.OO BACH PERIMETER& PARKINGARBAS 1:5 • 1.75" CALIPER $225.00•EACH ltmRlOII t..,OIUSCAl'lNO ~. ~ ttf..QUrl;f:.!) LAm;,sc;APLNO 8. EVERGREEN TREES FIVE (5) FEETORABOVE .$150.00EACH C. SHRUBS $35.00EACH . @ SUBTOTAL BOND AMOUNT = · MS!' (1000 SQ; l'T) t.;1SF (]OOO_SQ. l'f) . ··cv(CUBIC:YARD) ·• · ' SY (SQUARE YARD) ... · SY (SQl!ARE YARD) sv}iQUARE YARD) CY (CUBIC YARD) ' ',•, , ... , .. COST-&LNJO!l COST&LABOR COST&LABOR COST&LABOR I I z.. , oei '. 2., too , oo BOND AMOUNT SUB TOTAL: $ PAGE-l0f2 ,,,,,-------·--·-·····. -~ .. -~·. -- . ... ·_' ', . . ~; GROUND COVER .. (d) oO '. $4:00 EACH COST & LABOR r-· 11--M_Is_c_EL_LA_N_E_o_us ______ -+------4-------4-----4-------ll · 1'REE.STAKES $2.6SEACH •FENCING: 'SOLID WOOD CEDAR $28,50 .BERM!NG $17.50 'IRRIGATION 80¢ 'REl.OCATING;'fREES ON SITE '36' DALL .. $260:00 60_" BALL $920.00 RELOCATING SHRUBS ON SITE . PER STAKE& LABOR . LiNEAR FOOT , INCLUDES LABOR· LINEARFOOT INCLUDES LABOR SQUARE FOOT EACH '"EACH· , . ft>()1. i:o .. . ·_·_.·-····_.....,;,.. .. ' 12" BALI ''$26.00 :EACH ... ·."1'17· -~l~24-",;...BAL_.;...· ~L·-------'----'l~=---i-;,;;.:.;;:,::___~--1...-;J.':,<!·----'l-------ll $33.00 EACH : I , ~ . ' "'",'" ADDITIONAL ITEMS Ad~ 30% :onhe BondSub-Total ·for-.Contingencyin. accordance with FinanciaJ:Gnarilritee Ordinance 120220, Section· 13. . . TOT AL BOND PRICE ' Rovised LBQW 8!29i2001 ,;:}.. . ... ' 30_:% CONTINGENCY: s . ~.J33;4t:·. . . . ... . . ," TOTAL BOND PRICE: s Z'fe.~718,.,~ .: ' ' . King County KING COUNTY · :c'1.~SC~E;1BOND'1Q(J~W0llKSHEET~ORM ' , ' ", ' >,:' ', ' " I, ' ,' ' > () Dept. of Dcvdopmt'.m and Envirorunemal Services 0 0 900 Oakesdale A venw: SuulilWt:St Renton, WA 98055-1219 206/296-66CXJ Bomb an: bused upon required landscaping only and will be posted for perfonnance and/or maintenance. Requirt.>d landscaping includes perimeter lnndscaping. surface parking area landscaping, (KCC ·21 A.16) and any landscaping required by SEPA environmental rcvh:w. The maintenance period U for the life of the projed, however, after posting for maintenance. the performam.:e bond will be reduced to 30o/o ($1,000.00 minimum) 1111d be held for n two year period. Upon re-inspection of the site the bond will he released if the site has been properly maintained (21A 16.180). A landscape mainten:mce inspection deposit of $316.80 ls required prior to permit issuance to ro"·er the costs of the ?-year maintenance inspection. Landscape inspections are billed at thr current hourly rate once the Initial deposit Is nhausted. If lhe project has not been maintained and there are dead trees. shrubs. grounJ cover, or other deficiencies noted in the n.-quircd landscaping, the bond will be held unlil the dcficicni::ics arc corrected, ·,i ·:' . . . . . .. . ~TYPE . . UNIT:PRI.CE QUANTITY .. PRICE SOD I.AWN AREAS S500.00 MSF (1000 SQ. Fl) ~ HYDROSEEDING S50.00 MSF ( I 000 SQ. FT) V>O"f <;;f I Ot, • .,\I, SOIL PREPARATION A. TOPSOIL (6 INCHES DEEP) S25.00 CY (CUBIC YARD) ?7 2:tis,c1a B. MULCH (2 INCHES DEEP) S4.00 SY (SQUARE YARD) 2-'"i, I I 2. , [JO C. PEAT MOSS (TWO INCHES DEEP) $2.30 SY ( SQUARE YARDi &- D. COMPOST (J INCHES DEEP & TILLING $26.00 SY (SQUARE YARD) ./'!,-- E. FERTILIZER $6.67 CY (CUBIC Y ARO) '37 z4!,,, 1'1 PLANT MATERIALS A. Df.CIDUOUS TREES 1.75 • 2.00" CALIPER (minimum height IO'J $250.(1-0 EACH COST&LABOR PERIMETER & PARKING AREAS LS· 1.75" CALIPER $225.00 EACH COST&LABOR 3 b7'5, ot> ll'/llAJl)M. LASll~APINO OR OTiffiR IW.QUlll!'J) l.AND!.Cft.f'IM, 8. EVERGREEN TREES FIVE (5) FEET OR ABOVE $150.00 EACH COST & LABOR -&-. C. SIIRUllS $35.00 EACH COST & LABOR I/JO 2., lOO , oo BOND AMOUNT SUB TOTAL: SUB TOTAL BOND AMOUNT $ 4-,t~ ' 1.,lt =s =\\ q (0 "" I = =~ u ' 1 8 PAGE 10F2 ·,-',t;·,• j·J ------~·"-"--••n••• •• ,:r, UNITPRICE, · UNIT.T'YPE ' . .·, ; ,• I , ,', . QUANTITY . . PRICE JJ. GROUND COVER $4.00EACH COST & LAflOR I'S ftf). (JC, '• ,:1 ,·,, . ., / .. , ~'-· MISCELLANEOUS TRl,E STAKllS $2.65 EACH PER STAKE& ? 79S LABOR FENCING: LINEAR FOOT q, 1.-f 2.,&So.~o SOLID WOOD CEDAR $28:50 INCLUDES LABOR ' BERMING St7.50 UNEARFOOT .e-INCLUDES LABOR IRRIGATION 80¢ SQUARE FOOT 1..b0'1 1. wo1. io RELOCATING TREES 01\' SITE 36" BALL $260.00 EACH ,e,- 60"BALL $920.00 EACH e--- RELOCATING SHRUBS ON SITE 01 12" BALL $26.00 EACH +?' = 24" BAU $33.00 EACH .;;,- ADDJ1'10NAL ITEMS .• 1?\..-A_'( U>vlfM~-r Ccf.,T ~tJtB~ 1'o1A.\..-:, . 3 6?, (>() !~g,,_'[A:6U:,,~ f'At/f,, ~ 1'=¥\v~ias .·u,s,-· ~ i:.Affol?-w-rAL-i. r,7t;. t,t:) SU8 TOTALBOND AMOUNT BOND SUB TOTAL: sW,4-#.~ Add 30% ofthe Bond Sul>-Total for Contingem.'Y in accordance with 30 % CONTINGENCY: Financial Guarantee Ordinance 120220, Section 13. $ 0,/,3,47. ---,....----- TOT AL BOND PRICE TOTAL BOND PRICE: sZ{p/57~ .% ----····· ---·-···-···· Remed LBQW 8/291200 I a ... ·-··--·-· ------------- " ·lQ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov January 8, 2009 Steve Terrell 923 Northwest SO'h Street Seattle, WA 98107 RE: Recreation Plan. KC File L08MI051 Hitone Short Subdivision, L04S0065 Dear Mr. Terrell: I have reviewed the revised recreation and landscaping plan received December 17, 2008. With the additional toy structures and picnic area, the grass paved area will be acceptable as an addition to the recreation space. The proposed plan (pages LI & L2) meets the conditions of the short plat preliminary approval as well as code requirements for a recreation facility (KCC21A 14) and landscaping (KC 21A.16). I hereby approve the plan with the following conoitions. This approval is only for the recreation tract. The street tree in the cul-de-sac circle will be reviewed by the Land Use Inspection Section as part of the street tree review. The following are my recommended conditions of approval for the recreation/landscaping plan: I. The access manhole cover shall be at the ground level and should not pose any safety issue. This shall be inspected and approved by the King County Inspection staff. · 2. The grass pavers shall be installed tightly to provide a continuous grassy area for play and leisure. The grass pavers, grass area and landscaping shall be kept healthy and thriving through the final inspection and at the time the performance bond is released. 3. The equipment (play structures, bench, and picnic table) shall meet at aminimum, Consumer Product Safety Standards and be appropriately anchored. The play area surface shall be of material suitable to play on and shall meet consumer safety standards. 4. The landscaping and recreation space improvements (i.e. play structures, equipment, landscaping materials, irrigation system) must be installed and . ,, • inspected, or a performance bond posted, prior to plat recording. The amount of the performance bond has been established at$ 26,578.00 for the recreation tract improvements. This includes the required 30% contingency amount. The BQW and the toy structure specifications are attached to the approved plan. An inspection fee is also due prior to recording. This fee covers the cost of inspections. The amount of the inspection deposit will be determined by the Land Use Inspection Section (LUIS). If a performance financial guarantee is posted, the improvements must be installed within two years from the date of recording. The Land Use Services Division will conduct an inspection one year after the recording date. The applicant may request in' writing an earlier inspection date if the improvements are fully installed prior to the one year anniversary of recording. Enclosed is a copy of the approved plans for your records. If you have any questions, please call me at (206) 296-7173. If you have questions regarding the financial guarantee please contact Finance billing hotline at (206) 296- 6659. Questions regarding the inspection process may be directed to the Land Use Inspection Section (206) 296-6642. Sincerely, Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Current Planning Section, LUSD Attachment Cc: Antony Ford, Applicant, w/enc Steve Townsend, Sµpervising Engineer, Land Use Inspection Section, w /enc Kim Claussen, Planner III, Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division Joanne Carlson, ASII, Engineering Review Section, LUSD, w/enc Carol Rogers, FIGMU, w/enc, BQW only · L04S0065 File ; IPre-ApL . ;ation "1leet6111g Request Form @ Please indicate if Pre-Application is: King County DVoluntary Jq Mandatory ·n -.. --• Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Pre-Aoolication Number: Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Yee Short Plat Applicant Name: Fanny Y. & Philip '1ll. Yee Address c/o Lang Associates, Inc 10658 Riviera Pl. NE Seattle, WA 98125 Attn: De-En Lan Date: October 21, 2004 / Phone: FAX: Project Description: The development of a 6 lot single-family short subdivision on 0.96 (41,935 sq- ft acres of R~ zoned land. The ·ect would have ublic sewer water and rivate streets. Parcel No. s: 6199000126 & 6199000127 Pro·ect Address/ Location: 12052 SE 1 Place All pre-application request submittal of an agenda, drawings project document and indication of issues to be discussed (check applicable boxes below) Please submit enough copies of the agenda, drawings and documents for each person requested to attend the meeting, along with two additional copies. Check the box(es) regarding issues you wish to discuss: D Building Issues: Building/mechanical (HVAC)/Energy/Barrier-Free D Fire Issues: UFC/Fireflow/access/Sprinkler/Alarms/Hazardous Material )( Site Issues: Drainage/Site Development Project east of subject site L04P0002 )lf Site Issues: Traffic/Road Access/Road Improvement/Parking Layout Private street proposed D Site Issues: Zoning/Landscape/Parking Count/Subdivision Design D SAO/GEO Issues: Landslide/Seismic/Coal Mine/Erosion D SAO/Wetland Issues: Stream/Wetlands/Flood Plains D Grading Issues: Grading/Site Development D SEPA Issues: Environment Concerns/Check List/Off-Site Improvements D Health Issues: Sewer/Septic/Water/Fixtures/Water Fountains D Other (Specify) Please complete the next page of this form to indicate the numbers and types of representatives that will be at the pre-application meeting from your design team. Meetreq ., PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT: OWNER: PROJECT PLANNER MANAGER: LAND SURVEYOR: FIELD TOPOGRAPHY: ENGINEER: EXISTING ZONING: ACREAGE: DENSITY CALCULATION: No. OF LOTS PROPOSED: PROPOSED USE: WATER: SEWAGE DISPOSAL: FIRE: SCHOOL: POWER: TELEPHONE: Yee Short Plat Fanny Y. & Philip M. Yee 11431-23Bth St. Woodway, WA 98020 425 398-4406 LANG ASSOCIATES, INC. 10658 Riviera Place N.E. Seattle, WA 98125 Attn: De-En Lang (206)3~ / Sadler and Barnard, Inc. 12714 Valley Ave E, Suite B Sumner, WA 98390-1522 Attn: Mike Luna 253 826-8135 TLP Pacific, LLC 17624 NE 30111 Place Redmond, WA 98052 Attn: Todd A. Popelka 206 396-8449 R-6 0.96 (41,935 sq-ft) See attached density calculation 6 (/Acre) Detached Single Family Soos Creek Water & Sewer District Soos Creek Water & Sewer District King County Fire District 40 Renton School District Puget Sound Energy Qwest ~ -Lang Ass!ciates, inc. •· Land Use and Development consultants 10658 Riviera Place N.E. •Seattle• Washington• 98125 • Tel: (206) 306-8880 • Fax: (206) 362-6848 October 21, 2004 Ms. Kim Claussen Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Re: Yee Short Plat-Request for Pre-Application Meeting Dear Kim: Enclosed please find five (5) copies of the Voluntary Pre-Application meeting request package of the subject project and $500.00 fee. We requested that all ODES staff relevant to the issues cited attend this required Mandatory Pre-Application meeting for the subject proposed project. Please schedule a pre-application meeting at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions or need additional informatioh, please do not hesitate to call me at (206) 306-8880. // Sincere!¥, ,/ LANG SOCIATliS, INC. ;//} // / V.. ---- De-En Lang President Enclosure Cc: Fanny Y. & Philip M. Yee , Ii ,1 I . ' i f2 ·lo . so -. ----'-/-·=lll-~c X (.o -. Re 6 'Sf.?:3:C e,.. -'> C~~.Uk..--. ,; t1·· 2.\A. l"\". l'OD foy-r-~l r-emLV\,~ ::iv-~er v' H Rt>O.O.S MPS ?4'2-. -$~1ot3 ----L~~e~v,-at::,-,4-G>-"?---$G-------------,/ r: V\le.-+1 AYtol. Gil "1E C-OY-ne..v- 0 DrPvi ~~ -)-' U.>Je,,\ '2-. Ba.6( ~ ~ ~l)~i ±!() . . Iii • c.-o.~,, M~ ~slrn~vi,t -1u lo ,vw; 0t, sob-~oi n.s I • Dbl.0Y1S1YWY\ ~~ · '. • CQP-LW ~-~ flW \_rru&~Jl=_~\M?1.Y1lltJJ · · · · I , ,4 w mi &J)"Ll~ tv\,C/,,~t10t~ ~CU'L-,, ~~~; . .i.e,. . II ''-;+,rt d-I . ~·~ o '!Zoo.A$-/. VY--btu,, ~Vb\10 ~ <S C 20 N'& w/v,1,s ' "'\~ ~ -~h!Qbr\t\oDd C.t>\lic.,+tn-- 4 \50> o.f-tMYSecti6Y' ~~ I if • l.-DY1SC¥'\."'t° of-er-o~V~ 'OWVU.X-~ I Ler\-;.., i1I o/ • C.VI ·de· SAf, b'\,U 'o. -'CX)' pt'vVet{_, lll v'. ~wex--!f-D\l-@) eY\1Y6l,QU2_._~S -tn pc., l"Y\t>"J°e.d 'II • (AAiV$ Vo tvrt,~~DY\ ~ I • II ) • - ' ' ' ' ' ,'I i:i -' . i , I I I ' I ·1 ':,r: ,i i ' ,I I ' 1• 'I I,, 1' ' ' I .Ii I!: .I l ! I 11 ,1 ,, ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,1 111 I 22525 SE 54TH PL, SUITE 252 ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 King County, Washington For: Hitone Short Plat Anthony Ford & Heidi Kuehlenz 413 S 47th St Renton, WA 98055 KC# L07SR019 GeoDatum Project No. 2009-050 Mark X. Plog, PLS, PE HITONE SHORT PLAT -TIR 6/30/2009 Revisions: Date Description 4-23-2008 KCDDES Review Comments #2 PAGE 1 CF' 46 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table of Contents Section 1 -Project Overview Section 2 -Conditions and Requirements Summary Section 3 -Off-site Analysis Section 4 -Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design Section 5 -Conveyance System Analysis and Design Section 6 -Special Reports and Studies Section 7 -Other Permits Section 8 -CSWPPP, TESC Analysis and Design Section 9 -Bond Quantities, Facility Summaries, and Declaration of Covenant Section 10 -Operations and Maintenance Manual Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 TIR Worksheet Vicinity Map NRCS Soils Information PreDeveloped Site Conditions Developed Site Conditions Appendix A -Bond Quantity Worksheet, Facility Summary and Declaration of Covenant Appendix B -Construction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Appendix C -Short Plat Conditions of Approval Note: Copies of all required easements have been provided under separate cover. HITDNE SHOAT PLAT• TIR 6/30/2009 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FIGURE 1 -TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET . . . l'RO.fr·c;·1 OWi\ I I{ ,\Nil 1'·\R 1 1 P1<0.1rcr i::-,c1"1 Fl{ Project Owner: Anthony Ford & Heidi Kuehlenz Address 413 S 47'1' St, Renton, WA 98055 Phone 206-919-0791 Project Engineer: Mark X. Plog, PE ---~ -, l',\I{ I J ·1 \ l'I. l)F l'Fl{,\11 r .\l'l'LIC,\TION r Subdivision r., Short Plat r., Grading r Commercial r;; Other I', RT, l'RO.IIT r I.OC.\TION \ -,\Nil lll:SCRll'.1 IOi\ Project Name: Hitone Short Plat Location: 12020 SE 190"' Pl, Renton Township: 23N Range: 05E Section: SW % 33 l'ARI ~ OTIIEI{ RI:\ 11:\\S .\Nil l'U{~IITS r DFW HPA r COE 404 r DOE Darn Safety r FEMA Floodplain r COE Wetlands r Shoreline Management r Rockery r;; Structural Vaults r Other , I' \1/r ~ -SIT[ (_()~(~llJi\rl \ \Nil Ill{ \Ii\ ,1:r B,\Sli\ Communitv Soos Creek Drainage Basin Green River/Soos Creek -1',\I{ r (1 Sil L c11:\l{,\C !TRIS I ICS - r River r Stream r Critical Stream Reach r Depressions/Swales r Lake r Steep Slopes ------------------------------------------------ l'\Rl'7 S()I L'S Soil Type Alderwoods (AgB) r Additional Sheets Attached HITONE SHORT PLAT• TIR 6/30/2009 Slopes 0· 10% r Floodplain ---------------------------------------------------', ------- r Wetlands Category II buffer r Seeps/Spring; r High Groundwater Table r Groundwater Recharg, r Other ----------------------------------------------------------------- Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities Moderate 3 FPS PAl3E 3 OF 46 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ll I I I I I I FIGURE 1 -TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET -I' \RI S IH \ rl.()l'~I [lsT Ll~II L\ rlOi\S REFERENCE LIMIT A TI ON/SITE CONSTRAINT 17 . -Downstream Analvs,s r Additional Sheets Attached l'-\R r 'I LS( lff()lJIIU:~11::\TS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION r Sedimentation Facilities P Stabilized Construction Entrance ~ Perimeter Runoff Control r Clearing& Grading Restrictions r;;-Cover Practices ~ Construction Sequence r Other l'.\RT Ill ":-lilff-\CI: \\'YI J:I{ S\'STl:~I r Grass Lined Chwt0el r Twtk P Pipe System P Vault r Open Chwt0el r Energy Dissipater r Dry Pond r Wetlwtd r Wet Pond r Stream MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS AFTER CONSTRUCTION P Stabilize Exposed Surface P Remove wtd Restore Temporary ESC Facilities P Clewt wtd Remove A II Silt & Debris r Ensure Operation of Pennanent Facilities r Flag Limits of SAO wtd Open Space Preservation Areas r Other r Infiltration r Depression Method of Analysis: r Flow Dispersal KCRTS r Waiver r Regional Detention Brief Description of System Operation: Surface flow will be collected in a series of catch basins and pipe then conveyed to an underground combination detention and water quality vault Facility Related Site Limitations Reference I Facility I ---- I' \RT 11 s·1 RUCI lJR-\L .\:\.\LYSIS P Cast in Place Vault r Retaining Wall r Rockery > 4' High r Structural on Steep Slope r Retaining Wall . ~ --- I Limitation I (;. Drain~ Easement r Access Easement r Native Growth Protection Easement P Tract r Other Part 13 '51(;;\,\TLIRI: OF l'R(HFSSION-\1 ri\<,INI· rl{ er under my supervision have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this e attachmen . To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. HITONE SHORT PLAT· TIR 6/30/2009 PAGE 4 OF 46 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I Section 1 -Project Overview The proposed development subdivides (Short Plats) two existing lots (less than 1 acre total) into 6 residential lots. To access the development an existing 30' easement off 120th Ave SE will be improved to urban minor access road standard consisting of a sidewalk on the north side and curb & gutter on both sides. Additional improvements include a recreation area located near the southeast corner of the site, storm drainage detention and water quality facilities to treat and detain the proposed storm water, and grading. An asphalt pedestrian path will be constructed along the east side 120th Ave SE, east of the existing roadside ditch, from the new access road to SE 188th Street. Impervious surfaces will include the future residential roofs, paths and driveways, and the proposed access road improvements and 120th Ave SE pedestrian improvements. Utilities including sanitary sewer and water will also be constructed to support the proposed residential development. The existing parcel is zoned R6. The project site is located in the SW Quarter of Section 33, Township 23 N, Range 5 E, WM, King County, Washington and is shown on the vicinity map below. J J c,s~e""1a~a~,.~s~, ----------' ~-~~e}ffJfil_"t=) re' ! ]:===::::,, ; %, \ ~l[fi!!_m:::st"""""' ~.::@::=i i \ I PROJECT SITE -, ,~. i l~U_ i.i! \\ ~. 11 I '--~~-=1 :.._.J._ _ _1. _____ _ r---"S,sE.,_,19e,2nd=Se.l -------, ----------- HITONE SHOAT PLAT -TIR 6/30/2009 1 /fii / 'Ji. FIGURE 2 -VICINITY MAP i l __ l I PAGE 5 OF 46 I I I I I IJ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The majority of the lot area is undeveloped with vegetation ranging from native trees to brush and grasses. Existing grades slope from the west to the east approximately O to 5 percent. The site currently sheet flows to the east to a non-regulated wetland depression. The pedestrian path along 120th Ave SE flows north then east to outfall within a Y. mile the same drainage basin as the lots and access road. The soils on the site are mapped per King County Soils Survey as Alderwood soils (AgB), see soils map below. Alderwood soil is classified as moderately well drained gravelly sandy loam, SCS Hydrologic Soil Group C and for the purpose of KCRTS modeling, Till. ...... ... . Alderwood gravelly sandy lom:i, 0 to 6 percent slopes (AgB) .--Thi8 ~oil ls nearly love! nnd undulating. It is sioilar to Aldetwood grave l!y s:indy loa:D, 6,...:z;o 1S pel'cent slopes, but i.n plnccs its surface l~Ycr is 2 to 3 .inches thicker. Arens are irrogulnr 'ln shupo and range froc, 10 acros to slightly ciore than GOO ncros in sii:c. Some areas are as c:uch as 15 percent included Noma, Bellingh(ll;l, Tukwila, anJ Shalcar soils, nil of which are ooorlv drained; and so::ic areas In the vicinity of Hnumcl~w arc as ouch us iO percent Buckley soils. Runoff is slow, and the erosion h:11.nrd is slight. n,is Aldcrwood soil is used for tlmbcr, posture, berries, and row crops, und for urhnn dcvclopccnt. Cnpabil i ty 1mi t !Ve-2; woodland group 3d2. HITONE SHORT PLAT -TIR 6/30/2009 FIGURE 3-NRCS SOIL INFORMATION PAC3E 6 OF" 46 • I I • I I I I I I OFFSITE ASPHALT INCLUDED TO COMPENSATE FOR ASPHALT WALKWAY THAT CANNOT BE CAPTURED --G e@[O) aitM l1iTil SURVEY --OVIL-5TRUCT1JltAL 22525 SE 64ttl St. Ste 252 Issaquah. WA 98027 (425) 837-8083 ,,, __ -, -.--~ l'}~· I ,~:~,rl1 ---- -"I I I - • ,~ ): .., 1,,1 :~ j~/il )• 11~; I j -;,\m- 11~1" ._' ,1 ~1f1 .. --. ; I 1/\I~'-'' 1 , 'iV ~~--I I ·7i r!, __ Llt,l1, ii I 1 I \Ir ,, ;~I EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN ~ ·- 8:::.'.:'.:'l_/~ I I ' l ' "' °'--/ / > ,.._ t, !.· ---T --\ -. ) / , -r-----.,,.,I \ \ I -.., '"''-''~' ~.,,,,-, . I\;\ > I \,_ / ' I l'~ ~\ ~-41.f'A ~ -H \ " "' ) I ,!J l I :;/, ·-~ l ' /_ I ) I ' !fil! ,j 1~ ---· J p-,7;;7~,7h:0 ; \ \ , ( ,) ~= "z.,,,, •-if \ \ f/ f 1j'i I, V-,,,/'• I ~ -' • -• if='<"'>"' ' -\ I I ~ ' 11 ·11'·' I' -,-----~ ~ ~ c-;:, ')\ \ J ;a • .PROJE-c I :SITE/ _I ~, 1' i' ' I\ I I /txi\'w,ij l ( ' ' \ \ \ " \/ -, --,*· '--' . I, ' 1 I ( I ' \ --<-·-' ~ i \ I ' I µ· 7. / ,,/ --'----, ' f u,1. /, ,-.. =--~1,-:;' !,,\ 1 \ 1() --_:::. -,., ~ f.r" = --\'"J(,; --~·-·~,-. -,--, c~-~--,-r(j-~\~p~==/=-----1--0 .----~--\'-(-' I ' , , -> -~C-/•' ----C--, I _I_ ,;.., __ _ ___ 1 ---/ • --=---1-i'---_,_ r ,c.;;;-;, ;/, ---t------>-r--1------..------1-·r11 I":_ ; -------~-~ _ ----J ' I 1 .._-. -,,==::=:=::::--:_-.• I)!: ! '!'"i:· _: _, i I \ I ) ' i _--0 '"'"1' I I j' --~= -' I ; _.. I I \ \-/ ) \ ') ~ ) i· ' > t---. , ,,., 1 i/i / -I /:-2--;, I I I // // / ~ -I ( /' /$'_ 1 1 ,, /~ ,,-7/?-r i 1· ~~1 I I ' /,,,~,, -~ ,;. I i I ~~ JI • "~~-- HITONE SHORT PLAT DRAINAGE DESIGN EXISTING BASIN CONDmONS ii I N ' GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 50 100 I·· 1'" '"I I i I/ID 31( j 1 INCH = 100 FT. 200 ;;:j DRAFT[R: MXP DESIGNER: MXP PRC>..ECT ENGINEER: MXP DATE: 6/30/09 PRO..ECT NO.: 09-050 SHEET 1 Of 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I OFFSITE ASPHALT INCLUDED TO COMPENSATE FOR ASPHALT WALKWAY THAT CANNOT BE CAPTURED --<G e@[D) arltnmm SURVEY -ovll-STRUCTURAL 22525 SE 64th St. Ste 252 Issaquah, WA 98027 (425) 837-8083 .,, __ ( M_l.!i fa' , ~ 11:H~ PROPOSED DRAINAGE BASIN HITONE SHORT PLAT DRAINAGE DESIGN PROPOSED BASIN CONDmONS I. L, ?-~·"" \;. ) ;i i I . " '-.,.... .,.... ( ;r,'7.7,77-1, '* -/,.\ " ;,; ·- ?,//•(////•,',/ ~~_,, > r-_.,, __ :::::::11 .... 1 50 0 I• "•,•I (-( Iii$ j N I GRAPHIC SCALE 50 100 I I 1 INCH = 100 FT. 200 "'""*"'"' / DRAFTER: MXP DESIGNER: MXP PRO.ECT ENGINEER: MXP DATE, 6/30/09 PRo..ECT NO.: 09-050 SHEET 1 DF I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Section 2 -Conditions and Requirements Summary The following summary describes how this project will meet the eight 'Core Requirements" and the "Special Requirements" that apply: Core Requirements 1. Discharge at the natural location: Currently, the site drains from the west to the east to the unregulated wetland along the easterly boundary of the site. The proposed onsite storm water discharges to a flow dispersion trench which sheet flows to the natural location. The pedestrian path along 120th Ave SE sheet flows to its natural location, the adjacent roadside ditch. 2. Off41te Analysis: A Level 1 off-site analysis was completed for this project and is included in this submittal. 3. Flow control: The proposed detention/wet vault is sized to meet Conservation Flow Control requirements per the 2005 KCSWDM using the KCRTS program. This requires level 2 flow control with pre-developed conditions for the site modeled as till forest, the historic land cover. Bypassed flows are included in the design of the proposed detention vault. 4. Conveyance system: Flows will be conveyed using catch basins and tight line culverts. 5. Erosion and sedimentation control: TESC measures are shown on the engineering plans submitted with this TIR. 6. Maintenance and Operations: Maintenance and Operations procedures are included in Section 10 of this TIR. 7. Financial guarantees and liability: The applicant or the Contractor will provide bonds for performance and maintenance based upon the information included on the Bond Quantity Worksheet provided in Section 9 of this TIR. 8. Water Quality: The new impervious surface area subject to vehicular traffic is greater than 5,000 square feet for this project. As a result, water quality treatment is required. Water quality is to be provided with a detention/wet vault and sized according to Basic Water Quality Treatment requirements per the 2005 KCSWDM. Special Requirements 1. Other adopted area4peciflc requirements: Conservation Flow Control has been provided. 2. Floodplain/Floodway delineation: Not applicable. 3. Flood protection facilities: Not applicable. 4. Source controls: Not applicable. 5. Oil Control: Not applicable. Section 3 -Off-site Analysis This Level 1 Downstream Analysis is submitted as required by Core Requirement #2, Section 1.2.2, of the 2005 KCSWDM. Core Requirement #2 requires a qualitative analysis of upstream and downstream drainage conditions with an initial project submittal. Task 1: Study Area Definition and Maps: See Section-1 of this report for a detailed Study Area Definition. The project site as mapped by KCSWDM appears to be in the Soos Creek Drainage Basin. HITONE SHORT PLAT -TIR 6/30/2009 PAGE 7 OF" 46 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Task 2: Resource Review: A sensitive areas review shows no critical areas on or near the project site. The following is a Drainage Complaints map for a Y. of a mile surrounding this property. 002< I " It 9162 Ji 9024 .,,. HITONE SHORT PLAT• TIR 6/:30/2009 0026 ·0025 ......... 0010, 0090 MAA ~ ;; J, -1' :::-"·· 0110\ 1! M« I :n 9161 JI '"' ~ ~I --i .,,. I ____ , L~" \ .,. 0036 0035 "'·~ 00'1 PAGE 8 OF 46 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I [£:] ~.!.~~~!~~.: Although there have been many drainage complaints, only two are downstream from the project site. Drainage complaint 1996-1550 is over 10 years old and related to a plugged driveway culvert which is upstream from our drainage path. Drainage complaint 2005-0446 was related to water quality and the installation of some BMP's on the school site. See the complete drainage complaint table below. lllog Cllmlty Water and Land Resom,:es DlVlsloD -Drainage Sl!rVa:es Section 1m1D13iDt Search Printe<I: 0412B/2009 3:27:14 PM Complaiot IJIII! IJIII! nf Probll!m llmnber Cllll2 1975-0076 C FLOG 1977-0072 C FLOG 1978-0060 C PONDING 1978-0081 C DRNG 1979-0047 C 1982-0539 C FLOG 1984-0298 C FILL 1984-0313 R FLOG 1934-0314 C FLOG 1986-1166 C FLOG 1986-1165 C FLOG 1986-1190 C FLOG 1987-0334 C DRNG 1987-0471 C FLOG 1987-0545 C DRNG 1987-1049 C 1983-0238 C FLOG 1988-0238 ER PIPE 1989-0003 C DRNG 1989-0192 C DRNG 1989-0650 C DRNG 1989-0700 X DRNG 1990-0075 C DRNG 1990-0141 C FLOG 1990-0149 C FLOG 1990-0231 C DRNG 1990-0235 C FLOG 1990-0274 C FLOG 1990-0342 C FLOG 1990-0372 X DRNG 1990-0709 CL FLOG 1990-0884 C DRNG 1990-1061 CL FLOG 1990-1186 CL FLOG 1990-1212 C DITCH 1990-1212 E FILUOIT 1990-1212 ER FILUOIT HITONE SHORT PLAT· TIR 5/30/2009 Adllrt!ss nf Pndll2m 12202 SE 192NOST 19248 121ST PL SE 19248 121ST PL SE 11403 SE204THST 12600 SE 192ND ST 18504 112TH AVE SE 13250 SE 192NDST 13250 SE 192NDST 11202 SE 186TH ST 11202 SE 186TH ST 11001 SE 186THST 11202 SE 186TH ST 11202 SE 186TH ST 18627 109THAVE 18431 120TH AVE 18431 120THAVE 18612 120TH AVE 18612 120THAVE 18631 111TH PL 18631 111TH PL 11254 SE 186TH ST 18400 112TH AVE 11202 SE 186TH ST 18425 112THAVE 11202 SE 186THST 11022 SE 184TH PL 11202 SE 186TH ST 11202 SE 186TH ST 18504 112TH AVE 18427 112THAVE 11202 SE 186TH ST 11044 SE 186TH ST 11044 SE 186TH ST 11044 SE 186TH ST 11044 SE 186THST SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE Commlllts lbros Pap. RO WY/FL0'0/112TH AVE SE/SE 186TH ST 686E2 686F2 EAST OF BENSON HWY 686F2 686F2 SOIL BULLDOZED/PANTHER LK AREA 686E2 EAST KENT AREA 686F2 ILLEGAL NEAR: 17409126TH AVE SE 686E1 TO ROADS OIV.4 686F2 SE 192ND ST/134TH AVE SE 686F2 STORM OVERFLOW 686E2 SEE: 86-1166 BRYANT. BIUL 686E2 BASEMENT GETilNG WATER 686E2 CULVERTS BLOCKEO 86-1166,1185 686E2 SPRING GLEN 86-1166,1165 686E2 INAOEQUA TE SYSTEM 686E2 TO RO COORO 04/27/87. 686F2 NEW DRIVEWAY WILL IT FLOOD 686F2 NEEO EXTENSION OF 42" CUL VERT 686F2 INCREASED RUNOFF/CHANNEL 686F2 X PIPE NOT WORKING 686F2 S/W DRNG AND DAMAGE 686E2 WATER ON SIDEWALK/89-0650 FRITON 686E2 PLUGGED CULVERT/STORM 686E2 POND OVERFLOW/9().()149,235,372/STOR 686E2 RID POND OVERFLOW/ROBERT/ STORM 686E2 RID POND OVERFLOW/STORM 90-274,3 686E2 WATER IN BASEMENT/STORM/90-141,149, 686E2 RID POND FLOODED/STORM 686E2 RID POND/ROBERT/ STORM EVENT 686E2 RID PONDS OVERFLOW9/90-141, 149,235, 686E2 CL#12959 SEE CL#13224 OUE DECEMBE 686E2 ' RID POND DRAINAGE/STORM 686E2 CL#13224 SEE CL#12959 GARAGE FLOO 686E2 MEMO/RUDDELLS STUDY TO PA 686E2 RD/SIDE DITCH-FILL/90-1186 686E2 WILL ST ART WORK 09/20 CHK ON 09/30/9 686E2 RUDEULS STUDY 686E2 Page 1 of3 I [EJ~.!~~~!~T..: I I Complaml JJIIII JJIIII of Prn!Jlom Address of l'rollll!m 1:nmml!llls lbros Pap llmnber l:11de 1990-1226 C ORNG 18615 107THAVE SE FLOODED BASEMENT/BAO ROADWAY 888E2 1990-1445 C ORNG 18427 112TH AVE SE RID PONO OVERFLOWING TO STUDY/91-686E2 1990-1530 SR FLOG 18427 112TH AVE SE STORM EVENT 888E2 I 1990-1531 SR FLOG 18427 112TH AVE SE STORM EVENT NOT NDAP 888E2 1991-0150 C ORNG 18624 112TH AVE SE 888E2 1991-0150 SR DRNG 18624 112TH AVE SE NOTNDAP 888E2 I 1991-0196 C FLOG 18425 112TH AVE SE 686E2 1991-0198 SR FLOG 18425 112TH AVE SE NOTNOAP 888E2 I 1991-0253 C DRNG 11254 SE 186TH ST 686E2 1991-0438 S1 SPK TO FINISH S1 3/4 -S2 TO '92 CON 888E2 1991-0667 CL DRNG 18427 112TH AVE SE SEE 91-0438 SEE RUDDELLS 686E2 I 1991-0837 C OAMAGECB 19001 116TH AVE SE C/B BELOW GRADE 888E2 1991-1095 C FLOG 11200 SE 186TH ST RUDDELL PONO OVERFLOW 888E2 1991-1132 C DRAINAGE 19006 116TH AVE SE INFOTOPM&O 686E2 I 1991-1149 X FLDGR/0 11200 SE 184TH ST CCF# SWM-1031 R/0 PONO CAPICITY 888E2 1994-0038 C PONDING 11430 SE 192NDST POSS GRADING/FILLING VIOLATION 888E2 1994-0144 C DRNG 17925 116THAVE SE POSS FILLING VIOUACT PLAT MORNING 888E1 I 1995-0200 C DITCH ?S 18204 116TH AVE SE LACK OF CONVEYAYNCE ON PVT PROPE 686E1 1996-0805 C DRNG 19400 120THAVE SE DRAINGE FLOW QUESTION DEVELOP INF 888E2 1996-1550 C DRNG 19121 124THAVE SE PLUGGED 0/W CULVERT IMPACT TO PVT 888F2 I 1996-1564 C DRNG 18908 113THWAY SE PRIVATE PROPERTY IMPACT TO PVT DR 888E2 1996-2071 C FLOG 11828 SE 180THST INADEOUA TE CONVEYANCE OFFSITE FL 888E1 1996-2071 R FLOG 11828 SE 180TH ST INADEOUA TE CONVEYANCE OFF SITE FL 686E1 I 1997-1123 C GRADING 18908 113THWAY SE PVT PROP IMPACT NO ORNG INSTALLED 888E2 1997-1123 R GRADING 18908 113THWAY SE PVT PROP IMPACT NO DRNG INSTALLED 888E2 1997-1179 C DRAINAGE 19113 121ST PL SE INSTALLATION OF ORNG IN R/W OLD/OF 888F2 I 1997-1179 NOA DRAINAGE 19113 121ST PL SE INSTALLATION OF ORNG IN R/W OLD/OF 888F2 1997-1179 R DRAINAGE 19113 121ST PL SE INSTALLATION OF ORNG IN R/W OLD/OF 686F2 I 1997-1301 C DRAINAGE 19125 121ST PL SE SUBST AN OARD INSTL OF ORNG SYS PVT 888F2 1998-0019 C DRAINAGE 19016 116THAVE SE NEW GRAVEL RD POSSIBLE PVT PROP I 686E2 1998-0058 C DRAINAGE 18820 116TH AVE SE SFR CONST IMPACTING ADJACENT PRO 688E2 I 1996-0926 C DRAINAGE 19133 121ST PL SE APPARENT OBSTRUCTION IN ROAD ORN 688F2 1999-0306 C DRAINAGE 11618 SE 188TH ST ADJACENT PROP PAVED 2500 SO FT 688E2 1999-0329 FCR BAMBOO 12317 SE 179TH PL NON NATIVE GROWTH IN R/0 FACILITY 688F1 I 2000-0398 C DOM 12625 SE 192ND ST REQUEST TO DIVERT FLOW OISCHARGI 686F2 2000-0572 C DOM ACROS 19029 120TH AVE SE APPARENT FILLING OF ROADSIDE DITCH 888E2 2000-0572 R DOM ACROS 19029120TH AVE SE APPARENT FILLING Off ROADSIDE DITCH 686E2 I 2001-0247 FCR MMA 12317 SE 179TH PL IDENTIFIED NOXIOUS WEEDS. BLACKBE 888F1 2001-0322 woo 11631 SE 184TH ST APPARENT GREY WATER DISCHARGE IN 888E1 2001-0322 woe woo 11631 SE 184TH ST APPARENT GREY WATER DISCHARGE IN 888E1 I • Page2of3 I I [r:]~.~.~~~~~~.': I I Collll)laiDt Type Type o1 Prublem Alll!ress nf Prublem i:ummarts Tbrns PaQI! IIUm!Jer Code 2001-0389 woe WOI SE 1SOT & 118THAVE SE POTENTIAL GRAY WATER DISCHARGE. 686E1 2001-0389 WOE WOI SE 180T & 118TH AVE SE POTEJ\ITIAL GRAY WATER DISCHARGE. 686E1 2001-0389 WOR WOI SE 180T & 118TH AVE SE POTENTIAL GRAY WATER DISCHARGE. 686E1 2002-0314 C DOM 18524 114TH AVE SE SHEETFLOW ONTO PROPERTY FROM UP 686E1 I 2002-0381 C DOM 11625 SE 184TH ST SOGGY AREA IN YARD. MAY BE THE RE 686E1 2002.0553 C OTA 19013 114TH CT SE CONCERN REGARDING POSSIBLE SLOU 686E2 2003-0545 WOR woe 18601 126TH PL SE PROBLEM CORRECTED RP MOVED 686F2 I 2003-0762 WQA WQAI 19433 VASHON HWY SW BMPS nre ALL IN PLACE 686F2 2003-0847 C DOM 19230 116TH AVE SE APPARENT OBSTRUCTION OF OFFSITE C 686E2 2003-0847 NOA-DOM 19230 116THAVESE APPARENT OBSTRUCTION OF OFFSITE C 686E2 I 2003-0847 R DOM 19230 116THAVE SE APPAREJ\IT OBSTRUCTION OF OFFSITE C 686E2 2003-0909 woe WODR 18601 126TH PL SE AUTO FLUID RESIDUE ON STREET AS A 686F2 2004-0223 FCR TRE 18004 124THAVESE Trees removed from Facility 092182. lnvesti 686F1 I 2004-0286 E MNM 18004 124THAVESE FocDity 092182 dispersion trench fined/grade 686F1 2004-0286 FCR MNM 18004 124TH AVE SE Facility 092182 dispersion trench filled/grade 686F1 I 2004-0286 R MNM 18004 124THAVESE Facility 092182 dispersion trench filled/grade 686F1 2004.0745 C OTA 18418 127TH AVE SE 2 pipes from neighbor drain onto comp!ainan 686F1 2004-0952 C OTA 12701 SE 191ST PL Referml from KC Roods. Flooding of bockyor 686F2 I 200S.0244 C DOM 18617 126TH PL SE Wet back.yard caused by broken !ltOml line? I 686F2 200S.0316 C OTA 12503 SE 188TH PL Backup in KC Rd conveyance system. lnvesti 686F2 20()5.()401 woe waoc 17844 120THAVE SE Construction debris dumped on private prope 686F1 2005-0428 C RFN 19128 113THWY SE Water flows across sideW3lk from water met 686E2 2005-0440 woe WODR 11447 SE 180TH PL DUMPING FROM RV 686E1 2005-0446 WQA WQAI 12600 SE 192ND ST BMPS IMPLEMEJ\ITED AS PART OF KEJ\IT . 686F2 I 200>0468 woe WQI 11700 SE 184TH ST Investigation determined 4-inch pipe exists. 686El 2005-0491 C DCA. 17830 116TH AVE SE Filling/re-grading on neighbor's property. Inv 686E1 200S.0682 FCR MNM 19133 113THWY SE Referral from KC Health. Rats in 091898. Inv 686E2 I 20()6.0173 woe WQDR 11447 SE 180TH PL RV leaving trail of sewarae. 686E1 20Q6.0173 WOR WODR 11447 SE 180TH PL RV leaving trail of sewage.Letter sent RV wa 686E1 2006-0299 C RFN 18621 116TH AVE SE Broken drainage pipe @ Benson Hill Elem Sc 686E2 I 200~04 WQA woo 12317 SE 179TH PL Trucking I construction business 686F1 ~04 woe woo 12317 SE 179TH PL T ruckino / construction business 686F1 ~so C OTA 18621 116TH AVE SE School const causing water seepage into yar 686E2 I 2007-0058 woe WODR 16005 113THAVE SE Renters car leaks gas/otl. 686E1 2007-0221 C OTA 19128 113THWY SE Request permission to remove veg from tract 686E2 2007-0242 R MNM 18004 124THAVE SE REPEAT COMPLAIJ\IT REGARDING IMPAC 686F1 I 2007-0352 FCR MNM 18005 124TH AVE SE Bamboo in 091672 tract? Inv found J3panes 686F1 2008-0253 R DOM 19248 121ST PL SE ORPHAN FACILITY ~VIEW FOR THE PLA 686F2 2008-0254 R DOM 19210 121ST PL SE ORPHAN FACILITIES REVIEW FOR GOLD 686F2 I Page:3of3 I I I HITONE SHORT PLAT• TIR PAil.iL 1 1 OF 46 6/30/2009 ' I I I I I I I I I I I I ,........ I I Ge0 Datum 1nc Task 3: Field Inspection: A field observation of the site and % mile downstream conditions was performed on June 9, 2009 . The weather on this day was sunny, and it had not rained in the area over the previous 2 weeks . Upstream Drainage Area: The landscaped area directly west of the site sheet flows to the west onto the project site. Downstream Drainage Area : Stormwater leaving the site sheet flows to the west through forested slopes from 0-20%. See Task 4 of this report for further information . Task 4: Drainage System Description and Problem Descriptions: The following aerial photo displays the site, contributing upstream drainage area, and downstream drainage pathway up to % mile from the site. The numbers shown on the aerial photo correspond with the photos in the following table describing pertinent segments of the drainage system . HITO NE BHOR.T PLAT • TIR 6 /30/200 9 P AGE 1 2 O F' 46 I I I I I I I I ...__, I I ,....... Photo 1 2 HITONE SHORT PLAT• TIR 6 /30/2 009 Ge0 Datum 1nc SUIIIYIY Ct'IIL-STIIIUClUaAL Looking north just west of the site. Runoff from the landscaped area west of the site sheet flows east onto the site. Looking east on the south portion of the site. A relatively small local depression is located on the south side of the site. Stormwater on the site fills the local depression and spills flowing to the east in large storm events . PAC3E 1 3 OF" 46 I I a I I I ,....... I I I ,....... I ,....... I I ........ 3 4 HITONE SHOAT PLAT -TIR 6 /3 0 /2009 GeoDatum Inc hllt'I IY•CIY IL •I UUC1 VIAL Looking north approximately 250' east of the site. Runoff sheet flows to the east at 0-20% through forested areas with thick underbrush . 0-400 feet downstream Looking north approximately 410' east of the site. Runoff sheet flows to the east at 0-5% over an existing rarely traveled dirt and grass covered driveway. 400-420 feet downstream PA13E 1 4 OF' 46 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5 6 HITONE SHORT PLAT • TIR 6 /3 0 /2009 Ge0Datum 1nc Looking north approximately 800 ' east of the site. Runoff sheet flows to the east at 0-10% through forested areas with thick underbrush. 420-1000 feet downstream Looking east approximately 1100' east of the site. Runoff sheet flows to the east at 0-3% through thick underbrush . 1000-1200 feet downstream P Al3E 1 5 OF" 46 I ,...... I I I I I I ,......... ,......... I I I 7 Ge0 Datum 1nc SUA'llT CIVIL tllU(fUlA\. Looking north approximately 1600' downstream of the site standing on SE 192nd St. Runoff flows to the south as sheet flow and shallow concentrated flow at 0-3% through thick underbrush. 1000-1600 feet downstream The drainage path as described above appears to have adequate capacity and no obvious capacity or erosion problems were observed . Task 5 -Mitigation of Existing or Potential Problems: A combination detention and water quality vault has been designed to mitigate potential downstream problems. Section 4 -Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design Flow control Analys is and Design The drainage on the existing site was analyzed for this project with KCRTS software. Figures provided in the 2005 KCSWDM and KCRTS manual were used to determine project location and parameters. A portion of the site and required frontage improvements located near the northeast comer of the subject site are not able to be collected and treated in the proposed detention and water quality facility. As mitigation for the uncollectable area, this project will collect an equal area from offsite paved surfaces within 116th Avenue SE and provide flow control and water quality treatment. A positive aspect of this proposal is that the uncollectable are from project site and required sidewalk improvements are low impact (non vehicular traffic) P.G.I.S. The proposed offsite trade area to be collected and treated is entirely P .G.I.S. Existing Site Conditions (See Figure 4) Historic Land Cover= Till forest Total Site Area (including frontage and access): 53,095 SF = 1.22 Acres of Till forest HtTONE SHORT P LAT• T IR 6 /3 0 /2 0 09 PAGE 1 6 OF" 46 I I II I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I Offsite Trade Area {asphalt walkway): 2,924 SF= 0.07 Acres of Till Forest Total Existing Site Area: 56,109 SF = 1.29 Acres of Till Forest CREATE a new Time 1. 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 predev.tsf Series 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:predev.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Till Forest Till Pasture Till Grass Outwash Forest Outwash Pasture Outwash Grass Wetland Impervious ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak -Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.081 2 2/09/01 18:00 0.104 1 100.00 0.990 0.022 7 1/06/02 3:00 0.081 2 25.00 0. 960 0.060 4 2/28/03 3:00 0.063 3 10.00 0.900 0.002 8 3/24/04 21: 00 0.060 4 5.00 0.800 0.036 6 1/05/05 8:00 0.053 5 3.00 0. 667 0.063 3 1/18/06 21:00 0.036 6 2.00 0.500 0.053 5 11/24/06 4:00 0.022 7 1.30 0.231 0.104 1 1/09/08 9:00 0.002 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.097 50.00 0.980 Developed Site Conditions: The developed site drainage system will route runoff to a Level 2 detention/wet vault that will release runoff to a level spreader in an easement on the adjacent property to the east. This is the existing natural discharge location. Developed -Detained with Basic Dispersion Impervious Area: Lots = 6; average lot size = 3,769 SF Lot impervious area= 3,769 x 75% (max. lot coverage) x 6 = 16,960 Sf= p.39 AC Access road & sidewalk & offsite trade= 21,789 SF= 0.50 AC \. ,/ Total Impervious= 0.89 AC Pervious Area: {Landscape, Lawn): 17,360 SF= 0.40 Acres {Use Till Grass) CREATE a new Time Series 0.00 0.00 0.000000 Till Forest 0.00 0.00 0.000000 Till Pasture 0.40 0.00 0.000000 Till Grass o.oo 0.00 0.000000 Outwash Forest 0.00 0.00 0.000000 Outwash Pasture 0.00 0.00 0.000000 Outwash Grass 0.00 0.00 0.000000 Wetland 0.89 0.00 0.000000 Impervious dev.tsf HITDNE SHORT PLAT· TIR 6/30/2009 PAGE 1 7 OF 46 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:dev.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.252 6 2/09/01 2:00 0.208 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.301 3 2/27/03 7:00 0. 229 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.275 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.268 5 1/18/06 16:00 0.333 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.505 1 1/09/08 6:00 Computed Peaks -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- --Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0.505 1 100.00 0.333 2 25.00 0.301 3 10.00 0.275 4 5.00 0.268 5 3.00 0.252 6 2.00 0.229 7 1.30 0.208 8 1,10 0.448 50.00 0.990 0. 960 0.900 0.800 0.667 0.500 0.231 0.091 0.980 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Retention/Detention Facility Type of Facility: Detention Vault Facility Length: 102.00 ft Facility Width: 16.00 ft Facility Area: 1632. sq. ft Effective Storage Depth: 10.00 ft Stage 0 Elevation: 4 69. 90 ft Storage Volume: 16320. cu. ft Riser Head: 10.00 ft Riser Diameter: 12.00 inches Number of orifices: 2 Full Head Pipe Orifice # Height Diameter Discharge Diameter (ft) (in) (CFS) (in) 1 0.00 0.55 0.026 2 6.00 0.87 0.041 4.0 Top Notch Weir: None Outflow Rating Curve: None Stage Elevation Storage Discharge (ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs) 0.00 4 69. 90 0.01 469.91 0.02 469.92 0.03 469.93 0.04 4 69. 94 0.05 4 69. 95 0.22 470.12 0.38 470.28 0.55 470.45 o. 72 470.62 0.89 470.79 1. 06 470.96 1.23 471.13 1. 40 4 71. 30 1. 57 471.47 1. 74 4 71. 64 1. 91 471.81 2.08 4 71. 98 2.25 4 72 .15 2.42 4 72. 32 2.59 472.49 2.76 4 72. 66 2.93 4 72. 83 3.10 473.00 3.27 473.17 3.44 473.34 3.61 4 73. 51 3.77 473.67 3.94 473.84 4. ll 474.01 HITONE SHORT PLAT -TIR 5/30/2009 0. 0.000 0.000 16. 0.000 0.001 33. 0.001 0.001 49. 0.001 0.002 65. 0.001 0.002 82. 0.002 0.002 359. 0.008 0.004 620. 0.014 0.005 898. 0.021 0.006 1175. 0.027 0.007 1453. 0.033 0.008 1730. 0.040 0.008 2007. 0.046 0.009 2285. 0.052 0.010 2562. 0.059 0.010 2840. 0.065 O.Oll 3117. 0.072 0. 011 3395. 0.078 0.012 3672. 0.084 0.012 3949. 0.091 0.013 4227. 0.097 0.013 4504. 0.103 0.014 4782. O.llO 0.014 5059. 0.116 0.014 5337. 0.123 0.015 5614. 0.129 0.015 5892. 0.135 0.016 6153. 0.141 0.016 6430. 0.148 0.016 6708. 0.154 0.017 Percolation (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PABE 1 9 OF 46 I [r:l ~.!.~~.?.~~~.·: I 4.28 474.18 6985. 0.160 0.017 0.00 I 4.45 474.35 7262. 0.167 0.017 0.00 4. 62 474.52 7540. 0.173 0.018 0.00 4.79 474.69 7817. 0.179 0.018 0.00 I 4.96 474.86 8095. 0.186 0.018 0.00 5.13 475.03 8372. 0.192 0.019 0.00 5.30 475.20 8650. 0.199 0.019 0.00 I 5.47 475.37 8927. 0.205 0.019 0.00 5.64 475.54 9205. 0.211 0.019 0.00 5.81 475.71 9482. 0.218 0.020 0.00 I 5.98 475.88 9759. 0.224 0.020 0.00 6.00 475.90 9792. 0.225 0.020 0.00 6.01 475.91 9808. 0.225 0.020 0.00 6.02 475. 92 9825. 0. 226 0.021 0.00 I 6.03 475.93 9841. 0.226 0.021 0.00 6.04 475.94 9857. 0.226 0.023 0.00 6.05 475.95 9874. 0.227 0.025 0.00 I 6.06 475.96 9890. 0.227 0.025 0.00 6.07 475.97 9906. 0.227 0.026 0.00 6.08 475.98 9923. 0.228 0.026 0.00 I 6.25 476.15 10200. 0.234 0.031 0.00 6.42 476.32 10477. 0.241 0.034 0.00 6.59 476.49 10755. 0.247 0.037 0.00 I 6. 76 476.66 11032. 0.253 0.039 0.00 6.93 476.83 11310. 0. 260 0.041 0.00 7.10 4 77. 00 11587. 0. 266 0.043 0.00 I 7.27 477.17 11865. 0.272 0.045 0.00 7.44 477.34 12142. 0.279 0.047 0.00 7.61 477.51 12420. 0.285 0.049 0.00 7.78 477.68 12697. 0. 291 0.050 0.00 I 7.95 477.85 12974. 0. 298 0.052 0.00 8.12 478.02 13252. 0.304 0.053 0.00 8.28 478.18 13513. 0.310 0.055 0.00 I 8.45 478.35 13790. 0.317 0.056 0.00 8.62 478.52 14068. 0.323 0.057 0.00 8.79 478.69 14345. 0.329 0.059 0.00 I 8.96 478.86 14623. 0.336 0.060 0.00 9.13 479.03 14900. 0.342 0.061 0.00 9.30 479.20 15178. 0.348 0.062 0.00 I 9.47 479.37 15455. 0.355 0.064 0.00 9.64 479.54 15732. 0.361 0.065 0.00 9.81 479.71 16010. 0.368 0.066 0.00 I 9.98 479.88 16287. 0.374 0.067 0.00 10.00 479.90 16320. 0.375 0.067 0.00 10.10 480.00 16483. 0.378 0.376 0.00 I 10.20 480.10 1664 6. 0.382 0.939 0.00 10.30 480.20 16810. 0.386 1. 670 0.00 10.40 480.30 16973. 0.390 2. 460 0.00 10.50 480.40 17136. 0.393 2.740 0.00 I 10.60 480.50 17299. 0.397 3.000 0.00 10.70 480.60 17462. 0. 401 3.240 0.00 10.80 480.70 17626. 0. 405 3. 450 0.00 I 10.90 480.80 17789. 0. 408 3.660 0.00 11. 00 480.90 17952. 0. 412 3.860 0.00 11.10 481.00 18115. 0.416 4.040 0.00 I 11. 20 481.10 18278. 0. 420 4.220 0.00 I HITCNE SHORT PLAT· TIR PAGE 20 OF' 46 6/30/2009 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11. 30 11. 40 11. 50 11. 60 11. 70 481.20 481.30 481. 40 481. 50 4 81. 60 Hyd Inflow Outflow Target Cale 1 0.51 ******* 0.30 2 0. 25 0.08 0.07 3 0.30 ******* 0.05 4 0. 33 ******* 0.06 5 0.27 ******* 0.04 6 0.18 ******* 0.02 7 0. 21 ******* 0.02 8 0. 23 ******* 0.02 18442. 0. 423 18605. 0. 427 18768. 0. 431 18931. 0.435 19094. 0. 438 Peak Stage Elev 10.07 479.97 9.83 479.73 8.24 478.14 8.55 478.45 7.05 4 76. 95 5.95 475.85 5.16 475.06 3.95 473.85 4.390 4.550 4. 710 4.860 5.010 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft) 16441. 0.377 16043. 0. 368 1344 4. 0.309 13961. 0.321 11502. 0.264 9718. 0.223 8414. 0.193 6454. 0.148 • This list of inflow hydrographs is listed in order of the peak calculated vault outflow. This does not match the order shown in the dev peaks analysis. However, each dev peak inflow event is listed here. The new calculated 25 year peak flow (hyd 2) is less than or equal to the original pre-developed 25 year peak flow (0.08). The new 2 year peak flow (hyd 6) is less than or equal to the original 2 year peak flow (0.036). Therefore the conservation flow control standard is achieved. • The following hydrographs display the developed storm event entering the vault and the corresponding vault outflow. Cumulative storm events over a short period of time have an additive effect on the vault outflow. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8mmn,D " 0 .. 0 .. 0 iii .. u. \!, 0 • ~ " ~ u i5 0 .., 0 0 "' -A ~ 0 0 72. ( l~ ~~ J \----_ 144. 216. 288. rdout.ts ' ' 0 dev.ts start Date:01/02/08 00:0 End Date:01/16/08 23: 00 ' 360. Undetained Developed lOOYR Peak ~e~""""'~·~·~~~Jt:mllO!!!!!~::::::::::::'.:=::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::J,~Q. ~ .. 0 N 0 0 0 0 ' 0. 72. Undetained Developed 25YR Peak HITONE SHORT PLAT• TIR 6/30/2009 ,n ,. \~ "'-n.. 144 Hru- rdout.tsf deY.tsf start Date: 10/19/06 00:00 End Date. 11/02/06 23:00 n ! " n 1"\.I V'-J ' T ' 216. 288. 360 PAC3E 22 OF 46 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8'!<mml N .., 0 m N 0 ~ 0 0 N in 0 .. ~ • ~ m 0 ; 1i .. 0 N 0 m 0 0 .:ti 0 0 M. -rt " 0 0 72. Undetained Developed lOYR Peak 8'!<mml . , cmm g ~ 0 T 0 72. Undetained Developed 5YR Peak HITONE SHORT PLAT· TIR 6/30/2009 ) ~J\ \J~iv\ ' 144. 216 Hour /\ ~ ~ \J 144. 216 T 288. ~ \. 288. rdoul.ts dev.ts f f 0 00 start Date:02/20/03 00:0 End Date:03/06/03 23· /II 11 ' I ( J 360. rdout.ts dev.ts start Dato:01/11/06 00:0 f 0 0 End Date:01/25/06 23:0 360. PAtllE 23 OF 46 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I 1! .,, I -~ -I 0 g 0 0. 72. Undetained Developed 3YR Peak m N 0 <!; 0 0 N 0 iii ~ ... \!. ci • N N u ii ci m 0 0 11 " 0 . ~ 0 " ' ~' 0 0. 72. Undetained Developed 2YR Peak Duration Comparison Anaylsis Base File: predev.tsf New File: rdout.tsf ' 144. ~ ! ' " ' 144. Cutoff Units: Discharge in CFS HITONE SHORT PLAT• TJR 6/30/2009 216. Hour /--..__ ~ vv J ~ 0l 216 - ' 288 ' 288 '" mout.O I I 00 00 dev.ts Start Data:10/21104 oo· End Data:11/04/04 23· IA 360. rdout.ts I I 00 00 dev.ts Start Data:02102/01 00 End Data:02/16/01 23: ' 360. PAl3E 24 DF' 46 I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I I ,I • • • I -----Fraction of Time--------------Check of Tolerance------- Cutoff Base New %Change Probability Base New %Change 0.019 0.86E-02 0.15E-01 69.2 I 0.86E-02 0.019 0.019 0.8 0.024 0.60E-02 0.52E-02 -12.6 I 0.60E-02 0.024 0.020 -15.6 0.029 0. 46E-02 0.46E-02 -0.7 I 0.46E-02 0.029 0.028 -0.8 0.033 0.35E-02 0.37E-02 6.1 I 0.35E-02 0.033 0.034 2.9 0.038 0.28E-02 0.29E-02 3.6 I 0.28E-02 0.038 0.039 1. 4 0.043 0.20E-02 0.18E-02 -10.4 I 0.20E-02 0.043 0.042 -2.1 0.048 0.14E-02 0.15E-02 6.0 I 0.14E-02 0.048 0.049 2.0 0.053 0.88E-03 0.88E-03 0.0 I 0.88E-03 0.053 0.053 0.6 0.058 0.55E-03 0.42E-03 -23.5 I 0.55E-03 0.058 0.057 -2.2 0.063 0.31E-03 0.16E-03 -47.4 I 0.31E-03 0.063 0.060 -5.0 0.068 0.21E-03 O.OOE+OO -100.0 I 0.21E-03 0.068 0.062 -8.8 0.072 0.15E-03 O.OOE+OO -100.0 I 0.15E-03 0.072 0. 064 -11.3 0.077 0.82E-04 O.OOE+OO -100.0 I 0.82E-04 0.077 0.065 -15.4 Maximum positive excursion= 0.001 cfs ( 3.9%) occurring at 0.033 cfs on the Base Data:predev.tsf and at 0.034 cfs on the New Data:rdout.tsf Maximum negative excursion= 0.005 cfs (-21.4%) occurring at 0.026 cfs on the Base Data:predev.tsf and at 0.020 cfs on the New Data:rdout.tsf Proposed detention vault volume= 102' x 16' x 10' = 16,320 CF Required detention vault volume= 16,043 CF @ Maximum Stage Storage I I [£:]~.!.~~~~~~:: --·C!lilll ,Q. I Return Period 2 5 10 20 50 100 <> Pradev.pks 1n Sea--Tac I • rdout.pks • I 10·1 R • in • I u. ~ • £ • • • m ~ ii • • ., i5 • I • 10· I • II 10·3 1 2 5 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 95 98 99 Cumulative Probabitity I -~ C, Q rdout.dur <> I targel.dur o ~ C, Q R I ~ C, Q ~ C, I in Q u. £ • ~ ia Q I ~ u i5 ~ Q 0 I N 00 C, Q c; I Q Q Q • 0 • 10 -5 10 -· 10 -3 10 -2 10 ·1 10" Probability Exceedence I • I I HITONE SHORT PLAT• TIR PAGE 26 CF' 45 6/30/2009 I I I • II I I I I I I • I I I I • I • I • Water Quality Analysis and Design The basic water quality menu is to be used for this project. The selected BMP is a wet vault. Facility Sizing Calculations Runoff -New Developed Condition • V,= (0.9 A,+ 0.25 A1p + 0.19 A•+ 0.01 A0 ) x (R/12) • V,= (0.9 • 38,749 + 0.25 • 17,360) X (0.47/12) • V,= (34,874 + 4,340) X (0.47/12) o V, = 1,536CF Wetpool Volume • v.=r·v, • V0 = 3 * 1,536 CF o V0 = 4,608 CF Required wet vault volume= 4,608 CF Provide 3.0' of dead storage below detention and above sediment storage of 12" Proposed wet vault volume= 102' L x 16' W x 3' D = 4,896 CF Length to width ratio= 102:16 = 6:1. • Per KCSWDM page 6-84 Vault Structure #3 no baffle is required since the length to width ratio is greater than 5: 1 . I I I I I I I I I • I • • I I I I. I II 1. I Section 5 -Conveyance System Analysis and Design For the conveyance analysis on this site the developed flows have been calculated using a 15-minute time step as follows. Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:devl5.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak --Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.424 6 8/27/01 18:00 1.25 1 100.00 0.990 0.296 8 9/17 /02 17:45 0.890 2 25.00 0.960 0. 890 2 12/08/02 17:15 0.588 3 10.00 0.900 0.341 7 8/23/04 14:30 0.500 4 5.00 0.800 0.488 5 11/17 /04 5:00 0.488 5 3.00 0.667 0.500 4 10/27/05 10:45 0.424 6 2.00 0.500 0.588 3 10/25/06 22:45 0.341 7 1. 30 0.231 1. 25 1 1/09/08 6:30 0. 296 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 1.13 50.00 0.980 The 2005 KCSWDM requires that the proposed storm drainage system can convey the 25 year peak flow. On this site the 25 year peak flow is 0.89 els when calculated using a 15 minute time step. The following backwater analysis demonstrates the flows that can be routed through the proposed conveyance system before it goes into overflow. BACKWATER COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR PIPES Pipe data from file:pipes.bwp Surcharge condition at intermediate junctions Tailwater Elevation:479.9 feet Discharge Range:0.5 to 4. Step of 0.5 [cfs] Overflow Elevation:504. feet Weir:NONE Upstream Velocity:3. feet/sec PIPE NO. 1: 30 LF -12"CP @ 35.00% OUTLET: 468.90 INLET: 479.40 INTYP: 5 JUNC NO. 1: OVERFLOW-EL: 482.89 BEND: 30 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 4.0 Q-RATIO: 0.00 Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI ******************************************************************************* 0.50 0.53 1. 00 0. 63 1. 50 0.54 2.00 0. 67 2.50 0.78 3.00 0.89 3.50 1. 04 4.00 1. 21 HITONE SHORT PLAT• TIR 6/:30/2009 479.93 480.03 479.94 480.07 480.18 480.29 480.44 480.61 * 0.012 0.30 0.11 * 0.012 0.43 0.15 * 0.012 0.52 0.18 * 0.012 0.61 0.21 * 0.012 0. 68 0.23 * 0.012 0.75 0.25 * 0.012 0.80 0.27 * 0.012 0.85 0.29 11.00 11.00 0.50 0.53 0.22 11.00 11.00 0.47 0. 63 0.40 11.00 11. 00 0.52 ***** 0.54 11.00 11. 00 0. 61 ***** 0.67 11. 00 11. 00 0. 68 ***** 0.78 11. 00 11. 00 0.75 ***** 0.89 11.00 11. 00 0.80 ***** 1. 04 11. 00 11. 00 0.85 ***** 1. 21 PAC3E 28 OF' 46 I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I • • • r ' • I [r:J~.!.~~~!~~::: PIPE NO. 2: 225 LF -12"CP @ 5.16% OUTLET: 479.40 INLET: 491.00 INTYP: 5 JUNC NO. 2: OVERFLOW-EL: 493.60 BEND: 0 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 4.0 Q-RATIO: 0.00 Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI ******************************************************************************* 0.50 0.37 491.37 * 0.012 0.30 0.17 0.53 0.53 0.30 ***** 0.37 1. 00 0.54 491.54 * 0.012 0.43 0.23 0.63 0. 63 0.43 ***** 0.54 1. 50 0. 68 4 91. 68 * 0.012 0.52 0.28 0.54 0.54 0.52 ***** 0.68 2.00 0.80 4 91. 80 * 0.012 0.61 0.33 0. 67 0. 67 0.61 ***** 0.80 2.50 0.90 4 91. 90 * 0.012 0.68 0.37 0.78 0.78 0.68 ***** 0.90 3.00 1. 00 4 92. 00 * 0.012 0.75 0.41 0.89 0.89 0.75 ***** 1. 00 3.50 1.13 492.13 * 0.012 0.80 0.44 1. 04 1. 04 0.80 ***** 1.13 4.00 1.28 492.28 * 0.012 0.85 0.48 1. 21 1. 21 0.85 ***** 1. 28 PIPE NO. 3: 262 LF -12"CP @ 3. 97% OUTLET: 491.00 INLET: 501. 40 INTYP: 5 JUNC NO. 3: OVERFLOW-EL: 504.00 BEND: 90 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 4.0 Q-RATIO: 0.00 Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI ******************************************************************************* 0.50 0.39 501. 79 * 0.012 0.30 0.18 0.37 0.37 0.30 ***** 0.39 1. 00 0.58 501. 98 * 0.012 0.43 0.25 0.54 0.54 0.43 ***** 0.58 1. 50 0. 76 502.16 * 0.012 0.52 0.30 0.68 0.68 0.52 ***** 0.76 2.00 0.93 502.33 * 0.012 0.61 0.35 0.80 0.80 0. 61 ***** 0.93 2.50 1.11 502.51 * 0.012 0.68 0.40 0.90 0.90 0. 68 ***** 1.11 3.00 1.30 502.70 * 0.012 0.75 0.44 1.00 1.00 0.75 ***** 1. 30 3.50 1. 54 502. 94 * 0.012 0.80 0.48 1.13 1.13 0.80 ***** 1. 54 4.00 1. 81 503.21 * 0.012 0.85 0.52 1.28 1.28 0.85 ***** 1. 81 PIPE NO. 4: 21 LF -12"CP @ 0.48% OUTLET: 501. 40 INLET: 501. 50 INTYP: 5 QICFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI ******************************************************************************* 0.50 0.31 1. 00 0.51 1.50 0.70 2.00 0.91 2.50 1.20 3.00 1.53 3.50 1. 94 4.00 2. 40 HITONE SHORT PLAT -TIR 6/30/2D09 501. 81 502.01 502.20 502.41 502.70 503.03 503.44 503.90 * 0.012 0.30 * 0.012 0.43 * 0.012 0.52 * 0.012 0. 61 * 0.012 0.68 * 0.012 0.75 * 0.012 0.80 * 0.012 0.85 0.30 0.39 0.39 0.30 0.31 0.26 0.43 0.58 0.58 0.50 0.51 0.45 0.54 0. 76 0. 76 0.68 0.70 0. 62 0. 65 0.93 0.93 0.88 0.91 0.78 0.77 1.11 1.11 1.10 1.20 0.94 1. 00 1.30 1.30 1. 33 1. 53 1.10 1.00 1. 54 1. 54 1. 61 1. 94 1. 32 1. 00 1.81 1. 81 1. 94 2.40 1. 56 PAGE 29 OF 46 I I I I • I I I • • I • I • I I 11 • II • I Section 6 -Special Reports and Studies There are no special reports or studies other than the Soos Creek Basin Plan that we are aware of. A Geotechnical Engineering Study was performed by Soil & Environmental Engineers, Inc. and has been submitted with this TIR under separate cover. Section 7 -Other Permits Upon approval of the engineering plans by KCDDES, a ROW use permit is required for all work within KC ROW. In addition, construction of water and sanitary sewer facilities to serve this project must confonn to and be approved by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. Separate building permit applications for residential construction on individual lots must be submitted and approved by King County DOES. Section 8 -CSWPPP/TESC Analysis and Design A Construction Stonn Water Pollution Prevention Plan is located in Appendix B . Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Per Appendix D of the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual, the following information is presented in consideration of compliance with King County Erosion and Sediment Control Standards: Clearing Limits have been defined on the TESC/CSWPPP. Cover Measures both temporary and pennanent are addressed in the construction sequence. Perimeter Protection is proposed in the fonn of Silt fence. Traffic Area Stabilization is proposed in the fonn of a Temporary Construction Entrance . Sediment Retention is proposed in the form of silt fence and sediment trap at the project perimeter until the vault is constructed. The vault will then be used for temporary sediment retention. Surface Water Collection is proposed by utilizing the vault for temporary surface water collection. DeWaterlng Control is not anticipated to be required for this project. If required, a "Baker" filtration tank will likely be utilized to filter stonnwater prior to release into existing downstream storm drainage system . Temporary Dust Control other than the temporary construction entrance is not anticipated to be required. If fugitive dust becomes an issue, watering the soil before it is worked will alleviate the problem. Temporary Flow Control during construction is proposed in the form of utilizing the proposed detention vault once it has been constructed. See Construction Sequence. Sediment Trap Sizing 2,080 SF (0.20CFS) ;a 416 SF '\\ \. I Section 9 -Bond Quantities, Facility Summaries, and Declaration of Covenant Please refer to Appendix A for Bond Quantities, F~cility Summary and Declaration of Covenant. Section 10 -Operations and Maintenance 1\/lanual Please refer to the following pages for Operation and Maintenance lnfonnation . HITONE SHORT PLAT· TIR 6/30/2009 PAC3E 30 OF 46 I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I • • I • NO. 3-DETENTION TANKS AND VAULTS Maintenance Dtfect or Problem Component Si:@ Trash and deb:is Noxious \Tteds comam::unts and p()C-Jtic."'I Grasslg:oundcover Tank or Vault Trash and detris Storage Jvea Sed:."Tlent accumulaticn Ta."\k Structure ?tugged U vent Tank bem out of shape Gaps beh',een sections. d.Jmaged jo:r.ts or mcls or tears in \'tzl V3Ult Structure Damage to wall. frame, bottcm. and/or top- ln!etlOu~t Pipes Sediment accumulation Trash and debris Damaged HITONE SHORT PLAT -TIR 6/30/2009 Conditions WMn Maintenance is Needed Any trash and debris nhich exceed 1 cubic fool per 1.000 square feet (this is about equal to the amount of trash i1 woukl take to m up one sbndard size cffic:e ,garl>age can). In general, there ~ be no visual evidence of dumping. Any noxious or nuisance vegetation which may constitute a hazard to County personnel or the publx:. Any ~dence of cor.taminants or poDution such as ed. gasd:ne. concrete slurries or p.J:1\t. Grass er groundcover exceeds 18 inches in height. Any trash and debris accumulated in vattt or unk (indudes floatables and non-flo.Jtables}. Acamlutated se<f::nent depth exceeds to,. of the diameter of the storage area for % length of storage v3Ult or any point depth exceeds 15% of diameter. Example: 72-inch storage tank vrould reqoJ:l'e deaning \'then sediment rNChes depth of 7 inches for more than Y. leng-.h of tank. Any b!oekage of the vent. Any part of tank/pipe is bent cut of shape more than \0% of its design shape. A gap ,wter than Yrinch at the joint of my tan I: sections or any evidence of soi partic!es @ntering the tank at a joint or through a watl. Cracks wider than Yrinch, any eV>denoe o1 soil entering the strucrure through ctXls or qualified inspection personnel determines that the va\O is not sttuetur3Uy sound. Sed:ment filling 20•;. or more of the pipe. Trash and debris accummated in inletloutlet pipes (inctude,s fl03tab!es and non-float.3bles). Cracks wider than Yr-inch at the jo:nt of the in!et/oudet p!pes or any evidence of soil entering at the joints of the inleVMet p:pes. Results Expteted When P,bintfflPce is Performed Trash and debris cleared from site. Noxious and mrisance vegetation removed accord:ng to applicable regutations. No danger of noxious vegeta'lion fflltre County personnel or the public might no:maDy be. Ma:eriats removed and disposed of ac:corcf:ng to applicab!e regu1atons. Source control BMPs impemen:ed if approprir.e. No contaminants present other than a surface oil film. Grass or groundcover rncnftd to a height no grHt« than 6 inches. No trash or debris in vault All sed:ment removed from storage ..... Tank orvaultfrffly vents. Tank repaired or replaced to design. No water or soa en:ering tank through joints or walls. Vault is sealed and sUIJCtW'3:Jy sound. ln!etfout!et pipes dear of secf:ment. No trash or debris in piJ)ff. No cracks more than Y.-ineh wide at the joint of the inlet/outlet p:pe. PAC3E 3 1 OF" 46 I I a • I I I I I I II I I I I I I • I I • NO. 3 -DETENTION TANKS AND VAULTS f.bintenance Defect or Problem Component Access Manhole C~nhd not in place Locking mechanism not vlOd:ing Coven1id difficult to ,emove Ladder rungs unsafe Large access Oam!ged Ot d:ffieult doorstpl.r.e to open Gaps. doesn't cover eon;,tetely Ltfting Rings missing, ros:ed HITONE SHORT PLAT• TIR 6/30/2009 Conditions Whtn M~ntenance is Needed Cove1J1id is missing or only parfullyin place. Any open manhole requires immediate maintenance. Mechanism cannot be opened by ooe maintenance pe15en with proper tools. Bolts cannot be seated. Se?f..loeking coverJlid does not wor1<. One maintenance pen.on cannot rem:,ve coverJlid after apply:ng ao lbs of Eft. Missing rungs. misalignment. rust. or ends. Large access doors or plr.es c.3Mot be oper.ed!removed using normal equipment. large, access d~ not Sat and/or access oper.:ng not completely covered. Lifmg rings not capable of lifting vleight of door or pla:e. Results Exptcted When Maintenance is Perfonned Manhole access oovered. Mechanism opens with proper tools. Covernid C3n be removed and reinsta!!ed by one maintenance person. Ladder meets design st3ndards. Allow5 maintenance pet!tOO s.T.'e access. Replaoe or repair 3CCffS door so it can opened as designed. Doors dose flat and covers access opening com;,lelely. Llfl:ing rings sufficie-nt to lift or remove door or pbte. PAGE 32 OF' 46 I I I I I I I I I I I u I I I I I I I ll NO. 4 -CONTROL STRUCTURE/FLOW RESTRICTOR Maintenance Defect or Probll!ffl Component Struaure Trash and debris Secf:ment Oanu:ge to fr3me and/or top sbb Cracks in waDs or bottom S~mernl misalignment Damaged p:pe jo:nts Contarr.:na:lts ~ pd:-..ttion Ladder rungs 11'.iss.ing or unsafe FRO?-T Section Damage Cle-3n0Ut Gate Oanuged or missing HITONE SHORT PLAT• TIR 6/30/2009 Condition~ Mainttnance is NHded Trash or debris of more than % cubic foot which is located immediately in front of the structure opr..:lg or is bklcting C3pacity of the structure by more than 10%. Tr.lSh or debris in the structure thal exceeds 1 ~ the depth from the bottom of basin to inven the lowest pipe imo or out of the basin. Deposits of 93,rbage exceeding 1 cubic foot in volume. Se<f:ment exceeds ea•, of !he depth from the bottom of the strueture to the invert of the lowKt pipe into or out of the structure or the bottom of the FROP-T section or is wi:hin 6 inches of the inven of the lo\wst pipe into or out of the stnxture or the bottom of the FROP-T section. Comer of fr3ffle extends more than % inch past curb face into the Strfft (If~). Top slab has holes larger than 2 square inches or cracks wider than Y.. inch. Frame not sitting flush on top slab. i.e .. separation of more than % inch of the frame from the top slat,. Cracks wider than Ya inch and lon;er than 3, feet. any evidence of sex! 1)3tticte,s entering structure through cracks. or maintenance ~ judges that strucrure is unsound. Cracks widerth.ln Ya inch and longer than 1 !oot at the joint of any in!et/out!et pipe or acy evidence o! soil particles entering struetute through cradts. Structure has settled more than 1 inch or has rotated more than 2 inches out of alignment. Cracks wider than Yr-inch at the io:nt of the in!etloude1 pipes or any evidence of soil entering the structure .at the joint of the inletfoutlet pipes. Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such as ca. gas.c&e. concrete slumK or ~t. Ladd-er is uns3!e do.,e to missing rungs. misaSg:nmer.t rust. c.-acks. or sb3rp edges. T section is not securely 3ttaehed to sttudllre waD and outlet pipe structure-should s.upport 31 lust 1.000 Cbs of up or down pressure. Structure is not in upright position (allow up to 10% from plumb). CoMections to outlet pipe are not ¥1.Jtertight or show SQns of deteriorated grout. Any Ides-other than designed holes--in the ltrueture. CJeanout gate is missing. Rrsults ExpKted When Maintenance is PfflOrmed No Trash or debris b!oeking or potenti.ily blocking entrance-to SlruC!Un>. No trash or debris in the structure. No condition present Ylhich would attract or support the breeding of insects or rodents. Sump of structure eontains no sediment. Frame is even with curb. Top slab is free of hdes and cracks. Fra.rre is sitting flush on top slab. Structure is su.'oed ar.d structurally sound. No cracks more than 11. inch ,'ride at the joint of inlet/OU-Jet pipe. Basin replaced or repaired to design standards. No cracks more than Y-inch w;de at the joint of inle1/outlet pipe,s. Matl!f'WS removed and disposed of acccr<f:ng to applieaNe reguhtions. Source control BMPs implemented a appropriate. No contaminants present other than a surface oil f.!m. Ladder meets de-sign standards and allows ma:nte-nanc& person sR a~s. T see1ion seairety attached to waD and outle'I pipe. Structure in correct position. Connections to oudet pipe are water tight structure repaired or repbeed and nods as designed. Structure has no holes other than designed holes. Replace de.anout 93te. PAGE 33 OF' 46 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I NO. 4 -CONTROL STRUCTURE/FLOW RESTRICTOR Mai:nterw,~ Defect or Problem Component Ori5ce Pla:e OamJged or missing Obstruc:tions Overflow Pipe Obstructions Oe!o:med or damaged lip ln!et'Out!et Pipe Sediment accum.ibtion Trash and debris Oaff\3:ged Metil Grates Unsafe grate open:ng (ff Applicable) Trash and detf'is Oamlged or missing Manhole Cover.'Lid Coventid net in place locking mechanism Not\YoritiDg Coven1>d d:fficult to Remow, HITCNE SHORT PLAT -TIR 5/30/2009 Condition Whffl Maintenance is Nffded CleanOIJl 1)3te is no; watertight. Gate C.Jnnot be moved up and down by one maintenanot person. Chain/rod Coding to gat• is missing or damaged. Control device is not ,,orting properly due to missing. out of place, or bent ori5ce plate. Any trash. debris. secfmer.t or vegel3tion blocking the plate. Any trash or debris blocking (or having the potential of blocking) the overflor, pipe. Up of overflow pipe is bent or deformed. Se<f:ment filling 20% or more of the pipe. Trash and debris ac:cumu1.Jted in inlet/outlet pipes {incrudes floatable-5 and non-ftoat.1bles).. Cracks wider than Y....inch at the jo:nt of the in.'et.'outlet pipes or any evidence of soil entering .lt the joints of the inletr'oot!et p;pes. Grate with opening wider than 1/ainc:h. Trash and debris that is 1:18ocling more than 20,. o! gra:e swface. Gra1e missing or broken member(s) of the grate. Cover/lid is missing or onSy partia!ly in pbce. Any open structur. requires urgm maintenance. Mechanism cannoi be opened by one maintenance person ,Yith proper tools. Bolts cannot be sea.ted. Sett-locking ccve:Aid does not worl<. One maintenance pen.on cannot remove cover/lid after apply.ng 80 lbs. of li:'t. Results Expect~ WMn Maintenance is Performed Gate is v,atertight and wod:s as designed. Gate moves up and dcrtm easav, and is watertight. Chain is in place and worts as designed. Plate is in place and v.rorks as designed. Pbte is free of 3D obstructions and ,YOlts as designed. Pipe is free of &I obstructions and ,-ro:ts as designed. Overflcm p:pe does not 31km overflat, a1 an e-lev3tion lower than design lrut'tloutlet pipes clear of secfment No trash or debris in pipes. No cracks more than Y-inch Mde at the joint of the inlet/outlet p:pe. Grate opening meets design standards. Grate he of trash and debris. footnote to guidelines fer disposal Grate is in place and meetS design standards. CovtrJtid protects opening to structure. Mechanism opens with proper tools. Coverllid c.an be removed and reins~ by one maintenance p...on. PAl3E 34 OF" 46 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I NO. 5-CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES Maintenance Defect or Problffll Component Structure Sediment Trash and detris Damage to frame arw!lor top slab Cracks in W30s or b<>ltom Semt-meat/ misalignment Oa~ged pipe joints Contaminants and pcCuton lrJet/~t Pipe Sediment aecumubt:on Trash .:md debris oa~ged HITONE SHOf:lT PLAT -TIR 6/30/2009 Condition When Mainten.Ince is NHded Sed":ment exceeds eo•.4 of tht depth from the bottom of the catch basin to the invert of the loY'6-1 pipe in"..o or out of the catch bas.in or is w~ 6 inches of the inven of the IO\'test pipe irr'.o or out of the ca1ch basin. Trash or detris of more than Ya cutlic foot which is loca:ed immediately in front of the catctl basin open:ng or is t,ocking c.lpacity of the ca1ch basin by more than 1~~- Trash or debris in the catch basin that exceeds 11, the depth from the bottom of basin to invert the lov,est pipe into or out of the basin. Dead animals Of vegetation that could g&nerate odors that could C.:1Use oompla:nts or dangerous 93ses (e.g .• methane). Deposits of garbage exceeding 1 cubic foot in volume. Comer of frame extfflds more than % inch past curb face into the street (If app&able). Top sbb has hol,e,s brger than 2 square inches or cracks wider th.Jn % inch. Frame no1 sitting ftuih on top sbb. i.e .. sep3ration of more than % inch of me frame m>m thetopsbb. Cracks wider th.1n % inch and longer than 3 feet. any evidence of 503 l).Jrticles entering ca:eh basin throogh cracb. or mainten.111Ce person judges !hat catch basin rs unsound. Cracks widerth.ln % inch and longer than 1 foot at the joint cl' any ir'..et/outle'I pipe o, any evidence cf soa partides entering catch ~n th,""OUgh c:racl<s. Catch basin h.1s seated more than 1 inch or has rotlt@d more than 2 inchH out of afignment. Cracl:s wider than Y.-inc:h at the joint of the in!etloudet pipes or any evidence of so~ entering the catch basin at the joint of the inlet/outlet pipes. Any evidence of con1aminants or pollution such as 00. gasoEne. concrete slurries or pa:t'lt. Secf:menttiUing 20% or more of the pipe. Trash and debris accumu!31ed in inlet/outlet pipes (inct-Jd.es float.Jbles and non-floatables). Cracks wider than Yrinch at the joint of the inlet!oude1 pipes or any evidenoe of soil entering at the joints of the inletfoutlet p;pes.. Results Expected When Maintenance is Performed Sump of catch basin ccntains no sediment No Trash or debris b!ocking or potentia.."y blocking entrance to catch bnin. No trash or debris in the catch basin. No dead .animals or vegetation present w.1hin catch basin. No condition present which would attl'3Ct or support the breeding of insects or rodents.. Frame is eY@n m:h curb. Top slab is frff of hdes and cracks. Frame is sitting flush on top slab. Catch basin is sealed and struetura:ly sound. No cracks more than 1 /~ ineh wide at the jo:Rt of infet'ou>Jet pipe. Basin replaced or repaired to design standards. No cracks more than Y-inch wx:le at the join1 of inlet/outlet pipt,s. M.awrials removed and disposed of accord:ng to appliCJbte regmtons. Source control BMPs implemented if approp:ute. No contaminants present other th.1n a surface oil f.!rn. lnlet!ou~t pipes clear of secfment. No trash or debris in pipes. No cracks men than Y...inch wide at the joint of lhe inlet/outlet pipe. PAGIE 3 5 OF 46 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NO. 5-CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES MaintftWlce Defect or Problem Condition When Maintenance is Ne,eded Component Metal Gra:es Unsafe grate open:ng Grate with opening Y.rider than 't• indi. (Catch B3sins) Trash and detris Trash md debris that is b!ocking more th3n 20•1. CJ! grate surface. Damaged« missing Grate missing or broken member(s) ct. the grate. Any open structure requires urgent mainte-nance. Manhole Cower/lid Cowritid not in pbce Cove-:llid is missing or orJy 1)3rtia!Jy in pboe. Any open structure requires urgent maintenance. Locking mechanism Mechanism cannot be opened by one Not \'lorting maintenance peBOn with proper tools. Bolts cannot~ seated. Sett-locking cover/lid does not WOik. Cownlid difficult to One maintenanot person cannot remove Remove coverJlid after apply.ng 80 tbs. of li."l. NO. 6-CONVEYANCE PIPES AND DITCHES Maintenance Defect or Problem Component Pipes Secf:mem & debris accum.ibtion Veget1tionlroots Conwr.:n3nl5 and pc<:u1ion Dam.1ge to protective coating or corrosion Damaged O:tches Trash and debris Sec!:mer.1 accumrlation Noxious ,'l'Mds Conurr~IS and pc,C:,lioo Vegetation Erosion damage to slopes Rock lining out of pbce or missing (H Appl;calll,) HITONE SHOAT PLAT• TIR 6/30/2009 Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Acromul.1ted sediment or debris that exceeds 20% o1 the diameter of the pipe. Vegttationf:oots th.lt red-Jee free movement of water through piJ)H. Any e-vidence of contaminants or poDution such as o3, 93sdme, concrete slurries or pa:rll Protective C03ting is damaged: rust or conosion is weakening the structural integrity of any part of pipe. Any dent th31 decreases the cross section area of pipe by more than 20% or is determined to have weakened stn:c:tural integrity of the p:pe. Trash and debris exceeds 1 wbic foot per 1,000 square fut of ditch and slopes. Accumubted secf.ment that exceeds 20•, of the c!Hlgndop:h. Any noxious or nuisance vegetation which may consti:ute a hazard to County per.;onnel or the pub&:. Any evidence of oontaminants or poDution such as o3. gaso!:ne. concrete sfutriK or pa.:nt Vegetation th3I reduces free movement of water through ditches. Any erosion observed on a ditch slope. One layer or less of rock exists above native soil area 5 square feet or nx,:e, any exposed native soil. Results Expected W~ Maintenance is Perfonned Gr3te opening meets dHi11f1 standards. Grate free of trash and debris. footnote to guidetines for disposal Grate is in place and meets design stanc:13:ds. Cover/lid protects opening to sttuclllre. Mechanism opens ,'tith proper tools. Cover/lid can be removed and reins~ by one maintenance person. Results Expected When Maintenance is Performed Water flows freely through pipes. Water flows freely through pipes. Materi31s removed and disposed of ac:corcfng to applicab!e regu!ations. Source control BM?s implemented a appcp:i.31:e. No contaminants present other th.ltl a surface oil fi!m. Pipe rep3ired or repbeed. Pipe repain!d or replaoed. Trash and debris cleared from ditches. Ditch deanedl~shed of a!J sediment and debris so that it matches design. Noxious and nuisance veg.iation l'fflloved accotd:ng to applicable regulations. No danger of noxious vegetation where County personnel or the public might nonnatly be. Materiats removed and disposed of ac:ccrd:ng to applicab!e re:gw.tons. Source control BMPs implemented if appropriate. No contaminants present other than a surface oil fbn. Water nows freely through ditches. Slopes are not eroding. Replace rocks to design standards. PA13E 35 OF 46 I I I I • • I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I --, NO. 12 -ACCESS ROADS Maintenance Defect or Problem Component Site Trash a."XI debris Contam..1.3r.ts and ~· Bk:ded to.1chny Road 5'.!tface Erosion. settlement. pothcles, soi\ spots. ru15 Veget3tion on ro:ICI surface Shouk!e-rs and Erosion Ditches Weeds and brush Modular Grid Contam:or.ts and Pavement poCulion Damaged or missing HITONE SHORT PLAT • Tl R 6/30/2009 Condition When Maintenance is Needed R.sults Expected When M~ntenance is Perfonntd Trash and debris exceeds 1 oobic foo1 per 1,000 Roachyay drivable by mainttnanoe square feet (i.e •. trash and debris would fill up vehicfff. one standards size garbage can). Debris which could dlrnage vehide tires or Roach'Q)' drivable by maintenance proh:bit use of road. vehicles. Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such Materials removed and disposed of as o3. gascf;ne. concrE-te slurries or pa:rlt aoeorcfng to applit3t:le regu!atons . Source conuol BMPs implemen:ed " approptiate. No contaminants present other th;m a surface oil fJm. Any obstruction ,Yhjch reduces clearance above Roadway overhNd clear to 14 feet road s:.:rfaee to !Ks than 14 feet. high. Any obstruction restrieling the ac:oess to a 10.. to At least 12-.'oot of width on access 12 foot mdth for a distance of men th.an 12 feet n>3d. or any point restricting access to less than a 10 foot width. Any surface defec1 Ymich h:nders or prevects Road driv~e by mainten3noe maintenance acctSs. vehicles. Trees or other veget11ion prevent access to Maintenance vehicles CJn access fa=1Y by maintenance vehicles. facility. Erosion within 1 foot cl' the I03Chway more than 8 Shoulder free of erosion and inches wide and 6 inches deep. matching the SW?Ounding road. Weeds and brush exceed 18 inches i.n height or Weeds and brush cut to 2 inches in hinder maintenance acotss. height or deared in such ,1 ,.,ay as to anow maintenance 3CCeSS. Any evidence of contaminants or poDution such Ma:eria!s removed and disposed of as o3. gascf:ne, oonaete slurries or p.3nt accorcfng to applicab!e reguhtions. Source control BM?s implemented if appropriate. No contaminants present other than a surface oil F.!m. Access surlaoe compaeted because of broken on Access road surface restored so missing fflOCUlar b!ocl. road inlltrates. PAC3E 37 OF" 46 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N0.17-WETVAULT Maintenance Defect or Problem Component Si:e Trash and debris Trt3tment Area Trash and debris Secfmen1 acaJrrobtion Contam.~t:s and pcC-.Jtion Vault Structure Damage to wall. fiame. bottom. and/or !DJ) slJb a=, darnased Ventilation lr.!et/~t Pipe Sed:ner.t accurrubtion Trash 3nd debris Damaged Gravity Drain lnopera~v~ Va.Ve ,,on·t Wal Acctss Manhole Access cover/lid damaged or drffiadt to open Loel.ing mechanism notvl'OR.ing CovenUd difficult to remove Access doo~plate has gaps, doesn't cover co,r.pletely Lffl:ng Rings missing. rusted Ladder rungs unsafe HITONE SHORT PLAT -TIR 6/30/2009 Condition Whtn Maintenance is Nffded RKults Expecttd When Maintenance is Perfonned Trash and debris ac:cumciated on facility si:e. Trash and debris removed from facility site. Atry trash and debris accumulated in v~ ftndudes flo.nab!es and non-floatables). No trash or debris in vault Secment accumu1Jtio."'1i in vattl bottom exceeds No sedimtnt in v3U!t. the depth of the sediment zone ~.Js 6 inches. Any evidenee of cmtaminants or pollution such Materia!s removed and disposed of as o3, gasc:Ene. oonaete slume5 or 1)3:J\L ac:cord:ng to applicab!e regu1atons. Source control BMPs implemented if appropriate. No contaminants present cth~ than a surface oil f.!m. Cracks wider than Yrindl, any evidence of soil Vault is se.ded and structurz1y entering the srruc:tu:e through cracks, vault does sound. not retaln 1Yatff or qualified inspeaion personnel detennines that the vault is not struct.J1'31ly sound. Baff'.es co.-roding, cracting. warping and/or Repair or repbee baffles or wa'.Js to s.hol.'ring signs of failure or b3ffle cannot be sJ)Kific3ticns. removed. Ventilation area blocked or plugged. No reduction of ventilation aru exists. Sec::nent fining 20·~ or more of the pipe. ln!et/ou~t pipes clNr o1 sed:ment Trash and debris aceumu1a?ed in inlet/outlet No trash or debris in pipes. pipes (inc:fudes ffo3tables and non-flo3Ubfes). Cracts wider than Y,.-inch at the jo:nt of the No cracks more than Y..-inch wide at inlet/outlet pipes or any evxienoe of soil entering the jo:rtl of the inlet/ouUet p:pe,. at the joints of the inlet/outlet pipes. Vatve ,'Cill not open and close. V .ahre opens and doses norm.ally. Val\re does no; seal c:c:npletely. Valve completely seals dosed. Access cowri1id cannot be easty opened by one Access ooverllid can be opened by person. Conosionfdefonnation of coverJlrd. one person. Mechanism c.1nnot be opened by one Mech.lnism opens with proper tools. maintenance person ,~th proper tools. Bolts caMOC be seated. Setf-tocking c:overJlid does ne1 work. One maintenance pe,son cannot remove Covern.id can be removed and coverJlld 3'te< apply.ng 80 lbs of <ll. reins~ by one maintenance p ...... Large access docn not bt and/or access Doors close flat and covers .JCCeSs oper.::lg noi eompletely covered. opening eom;,letely. lifting rings not cap,able of lifting weight of door L~ng rings sufficient to lift or or pla:e. remove door or plate. Missing nmgs. 1T.is.ilignment, rust, or crad.s. Ladder meets de-sign stand.lfds. ADows maintenance person s.r.e access. PAGE 38 OF" 46 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Appendix A -Bond Quantity Worksheet, Facility Summary and Declaration of Covenant r , • l ' ' ' ) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 11ft Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet King County Department of Development & Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Project Name: Hitone Short Plat Location: 12020 SE 190th Pl Clearing greater than or equal to 5,000 board feet of timber? ~~~~~~ yes If yes, Forest Practice Permit Number: (RCW76.09) Page 1 of9 bondqtywksht x no Date: 10/30/2008 Project No.: L04S00065 Activity No.: L07SR403 Note: All prices include labor, equipment, materials, overhead and profit. Prices are from RS Means data adjusted for the Seattle area or from local sources if not included in the RS Means database. Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 04/22/02 Report Date: 6/30/2009 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Unit • • • • #of Reference# Price Unit Quantity Applications Cost EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL Backfill & comoaction-embankment Check dams, 4" minus rock SWDM 5.4.6.3 Crushed surfacina 1 1/4" minus WSDOT 9-03.9(3) Ditchina Excavation-bulk Fence, silt SWDM 5.4.3.1 Fence, Temnnrarv (NGPEl Hvdroseedina SWDM 5.4.2.4 Jute Mesh SWDM 5.4.2.2 Mulch, bv hand, straw, 3" deeo SWDM 5.4.2.1 Mulch, by machine, straw, 2" deeo SWDM 5.4.2.1 Pioina, temporarv, CPP, 6" Pipina, temporary, CPP, 8" Pioina, temporarv, CPP, 12" Plastic covering, 6mm thick, sandbanned SWDM 5.4.2.3 Rio Rao, machine olaced; slooes WSDOT 9-13.1 (2) Rock Construction Entrance, 50'x15'x1' SWDM 5.4.4.1 Rock Construction Entrance, 100'x15'x1' SWDM 5.4.4.1 Sediment pond riser assemblv l SWDM 5.4.5.2 Sediment trao, 5' hiah berm I SWDM 5.4.5.1 Seel. trap, 5' high, riprapped spillway berm section SWDM 5.4.5.1 Seedina, bv hand SWDM 5.4.2.4 Soddina, 1" deep, level around r SWDM 5.4.2.5 Soddina, 1" deeo, slooed around I SWDM 5.4.2.5 TESC Supervisor Water truck, dust control SWDM5.4.7 WRITE-IN-ITEMS **** lsee nane 91 Page 2 of9 bondqtywksht $ 5.62 CY 809 $ 67.51 Each $ 85.45 CY $ 8.08 CY $ 1.50 CY 921 $ 1.38 LF 450 $ 1.38 LF $ 0.59 SY $ 1.45 SY $ 2.01 SY $ 0.53 SY $ 10.70 LF $ 16.10 LF $ 20.70 LF 25 $ 2.30 SY $ 39.08 CY $ 1,464.34 Each $ 2,928.68 Each 1 $ 1,949.38 Each $ 17.91 LF $ 68.54 LF $ 0.51 SY $ 6.03 SY $ 7.45 SY $ 74.75 HR 40 $ 97.75 HR 20 Each ESC SUBTOTAL: 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: ESCTOTAL: COLUMN: 1 4547 1 1382 1 621 1 518 1 2929 1 2990 1 1955 $ 14,940.26 $ 4,482.08 $ 19,422.34 A Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 04/22/02 Report Date: 6/30/2009 • • • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • S1te Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet • • • • Unit Price GENERAL ITEMS Backfill & Compaction-embankment $ 5.62 Backfill & Comoaction-trench $ 8.53 Clear/Remove Brush, bv hand $ 0.36 ClearinQ/Grubbina/Tree Removal $ 8,876.16 Excavation -bulk $ 1.50 Excavation -Trench $ 4.06 Fencina, cedar, 6' hioh $ 18.55 Fencing, chain link, vinvl coated, 6' hiah $ 13.44 Fencini:i, chain link, gate, vinvl coated, 20' $ 1,271.81 Fencina, spilt rail, 3' hioh $ 12.12 Fill & compact -common barrow $ 22.57 Fill & comoact -aravel base $ 25.48 Fill & compact -screened toosoil $ 37.85 Gabion, 12" deeo, stone filled mesh $ 54.31 Gabion, 18" deep, stone filled mesh $ 74.85 Gabion, 36" deeo, stone filled mesh $ 132.48 Gradina, fine, hv hand $ 2.02 Gradino, fine, with arader $ 0.95 Monuments, 3' Iona $ 135.13 Sensitive Areas Sign $ 2.88 Soddina, 1" deep, sloped around $ 7.46 Survevina, line & arade $ 788.26 Survevina, lot location/lines $ 1,556.64 Traffic control crew C 2 flanners ) $ 85.18 Trail, 4" chin.......i wood $ 7.59 Trail, 4" crushed cinder $ 8.33 Trail, 4" top course $ 8.19 Wall, retainina, concrete $ 44.16 Wall, rockery $ 9.49 Page 3 of9 SUBTOTAL *KCC 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. bondqtywksht Unit CY CY SY Acre CY CY LF LF Each LF CY CY CY SY SY SY SY SY Each Each SY Dav Acre HR SY SY SY SF SF Existing Future Public Right-of-Way Road Improvements & Drainaae Facilities Quant. Cost Quant. Cost 50 281.00 330 1,854.60 43 366.79 180 1,535.40 48 194.88 200 812.00 456 433.20 1715 1,629.25 1 135.13 1 788.26 5 3,941.30 40 3,407.20 5,606.46 9,772.55 Private Quantity Completed Improvements (Bond Reduction)• Quant. 100 5 0.5 10 65 3 2 1.5 200 Quant. Cost Complete Cost 562.00 42.65 4,438.08 40.60 61.75 405.39 1,576.52 2,334.96 1,898.00 11,359.95 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 6/30/2009 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Unit Price ROAD IMPROVEMENT AC Grindina, 4' wide machine< 1000sv $ 23.00 AC Grindina, 4' wide machine 1000-2000sv $ 5.75 AC Grindina, 4' wide machine> 2000sv $ 1.38 AC Removal/OisoosaVReoair $ 41.14 Barricade, hme I $ 30.03 Barricade, tvne Ill ( Permanent) $ 45.05 Curb & Gutter, rolled $ 13.27 Curb & Gutter, vertical $ 9.69 Curb and Gutter, demolition and disoosal $ 13.58 Curb, extruded asphalt $ 2.44 Curb, extruded concrete $ 2.56 Sawcut, aschalt, 3" depth $ 1.85 Sawcut, concrete, per 1" decth $ 1.69 Sealant, asphalt $ 0.99 Shoulder, AC, I see AC road untt price) $ - Shoulder, aravel, 4" thick $ 7.53 Sidewalk, 4" thick $ 30.52 Sidewalk, 4" thick, demolition and disoosal $ 27.73 Sidewalk, 5" thick $ 34.94 Sidewalk, 5" thick, demolition and disoosal $ 34.65 $ion, handicao $ 85.28 Stripina, per stall $ 5.82 Striping, thermoplastic, t for crosswalk l $ 2.38 Striping, 4H reflectorized line $ 0.25 Page 4 of 9 SUBTOTAL *KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. bondqtywksht Existing Future Public Private Right-of-way Road Improvements Improvements & Drainaae Facilities Untt Quant. I Cost Quant. I Cost Quant. I Cost SY 450 10,350.00 SY SY SY 15 617.10 LF LF LF 1286 17,065.22 LF 209 2,025.21 LF LF LF LF 140 259.00 LF LF 140 138.60 SY SY SY 343 10,468.36 100 3,052.00 SY SY SY Each Each SF LF 200 50.00 23,908.27 20,117.22 • • • • Bond Reduction* Quant. Comclete Cost Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 6130/2009 • • • • • • ••• • • • • • •• • • • Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksneet Existing Future Public Private Right-of-way Road Improvements Improvements & Dralnaae Facilities Unit Price Unit Quant. Cost Quant. I Cost Quant. Cost ROAD SURFACING (4" Rock; 2.5 base & 1.5" top course) For '93 KCRS ( 6.5" Rock-5" base & 1.5" top course) For KCRS '93, (additional 2.5" base) add: $ 3.60 SY AC OVerlav, 1.5" AC $ 7.39 SY 450 3,325.50 AC OVerlav, 2" AC $ 8.75 SY AC Road, 2", 4" rock, First 2500 SY $ 17.24 SY 313 5,396.12 AC Road, 2", 4" rock, Qtv. over 2500SY $ 13.36 SY AC Road, 3", 4" rock, First 2500 SY $ 19.69 SY 144 2,835.36 1715 33,768.35 AC Road, 3", 4" rock, Qtv. over 2500 SY $ 15.81 SY AC Road, 5", First 2500 SY $ 14.57 SY AC Road, 5", Qtv. over 2500 SY $ 13.94 SY AC Road, 6", First 2500 SY $ 16.76 SY AC Road, 6", Qtv. over 2500 SY $ 16.12 SY Asphalt Treated Base, 4" thick $ 9.21 SY Gravel Road, 4" rock, First 2500 SY $ 11.41 SY Gravel Road, 4" rock, Qtv. over 2500 SY $ 7.53 SY PCC Road, 5", no base, over 2500 SY $ 21.51 SY PCC Road, 6", no base, over 2500 SY $ 21.87 SY Thickened Edge $ 6.89 LF Page 5 ol 9 SUBTOTAL 11,556.98 33,768.35 \ *KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. bondqtywksht ' 1 J • • • Bond Reduction• Quant. Complete Cost Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 6/30/2009 • • • • • • •sit:'rm~v~en!\o~ Q~nti~W,ks~et • • • • • Unit Price Unit DRAINAGE (CPP = Corrugated Plastic Pipe, N12 or Equivalent) Access Road, RID $ 16.74 Bollards -fixed $ 240.74 Bollards -removable $ 452.34 • (CBS include frame and lid\ CBTvnel $ 1,257.64 CBTvnelL $ 1,433.59 CB T= 11, 48" diameter $ 2,033.57 for additional depth over 4' $ 436.52 CB Tvne II, 54" diameter $ 2,192.54 for additional depth over 4' $ 486.53 CB Tvne II, 60" diameter $ 2,351.52 for additional depth over 4' $ 536.54 CB Tvpe II, 72" diameter $ 3,212.64 for additional depth over 4' $ 692.21 Through-curb Inlet Framework (Add) $ 366.09 Cleanout, PVC, 4" $ 130.55 Cleanout, PVC, 6" $ 174.90 Cleanout, PVC, 8" $ 224.19 Culvert, PVC, 4" $ 8.64 Culvert, PVC, 6" $ 12.60 Culvert, PVC, 8" $ 13.33 Culvert, PVC, 12" $ 21.77 Culvert, CMP, 8" $ 17.25 Culvert, CMP, 12" $ 26.45 Culvert, CMP, 15" $ 32.73 Culvert, CMP, 18" $ 37.74 Culvert, CMP, 24" $ 53.33 Culvert, CMP, 30" $ 71.45 Culvert, CMP, 36" $ 112.11 Culvert, CMP, 48" $ 140.83 Culvert, CMP, 60" $ 235.45 Culvert, CMP, 72" $ 302.58 Page 6 of 9 SUBTOTAL *KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. bondqtywksht SY Each Each Each Each Each FT Each FT Each FT Each FT Each Each Each Each LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF Quant. Existing Future Public Private Bond Reduction• Right-of-way Road Improvements Improvements & Dralnaae Facilities Quant. Cost Quant. Cost Quant. I Cost Comclete Cost For Culvert prices, Average of 4' cover was assumed. Assume perforated PVC is same price as solid pipe. 45 753.30 2 904.68 7 8,803.48 10,461.46 6 1,049.40 1,049.40 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4122/02 Report Date: 6/3012009 • • • • • • ••••••••••••• S1te Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet DRAINAGE CONTINUED Unit Price Culvert, Concrete, 8" $ 21.02 Culvert, Concrete, 12" $ 30.05 Culvert, Concrete, 15" $ 37.34 Culvert, Concrete, 18" $ 44.51 Culvert, Concrete, 24" $ 61.07 Culvert, Concrete, 30" $ 104.18 Culvert, Concrete, 36" $ 137.63 Culvert, Concrete, 42" $ 158.42 Culvert, Concrete, 48" $ 175.94 Culvert, CPP, 6" $ 10.70 Culvert, CPP, 8" $ 16.10 Culvert, CPP, 12" $ 20.70 Culvert, CPP, 15" $ 23.00 Culvert, CPP, 18" $ 27.60 Culvert, CPP, 24" $ 36.80 Culvert, CPP, 30" $ 48.30 Culvert, CPP, 36" $ 55.20 Ditchina $ 8.08 Flow Disoersal Trench 11,436 base+) $ 25.99 French Drain (3' deoth) $ 22.60 Geotextile, laid in trench, oot..'"rO"'"ene $ 2.40 Infiltration nnnd testina $ 74.75 Mid-tank Access Riser, 48" dia, 6' deen $ 1,605.40 Pond Overflow s, illwav $ 14.01 Restrictor/Oil Seoarator, 12" $ 1,045.19 Restrictor/Oil Separator, 15" $ 1,095.56 Restrictor/Oil Seoarator, 18" $ 1,146.16 Riprao, olaced $ 39.08 Tank End Reducer (36" diameter) $ 1,000.50 Trash Rack, 12" $ 211.97 Trash Rack, 15" $ 237.27 Trash Rack, 18" $ 268.89 Trash Rack, 21" $ 306.84 Page 7 of 9 SUBTOTAL *KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. bondqtywksht Existing Future Public Private Right-of-way Road Improvements Improvements & Drainage Facilities Unit Quant. Cost Quant. Cost Quant. Cost LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF LF 700 LF LF 741 15338.7 LF LF LF LF LF CY LF LF SY HR Each SY Each Each Each CY Each Each Each Each Each 15338.7 • • • • Bond Reduction• Quant. Complete Cost 7490 7490 Unrt prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 6/30/2009 • • • • • • ••• • • • • • •• • • • S1te Improvement Bond Quantity Workstieet • • • • Unit Price Unit PARKING LOT SURFACING 2" AC, 2" ton course rock & 4" borrow $ 15.84 SY 2" AC, 1.5" top course & 2.5" base course $ 17.24 SY 4" select borrow $ 4.55 SY 1.5" top course rock & 2.5" base course $ 11.41 SY WRITE-IN-ITEl1/lS Vault $ 7.00 CF EA. LF EA. EA. EA. LF SF LF LF SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL (SUM ALL PAGES): 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: Page B of 9 *KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. bondqtywksht GRANDTOTAL: COLUMN: Existing Future Public Rlght-of-way Road Improvements & Dralnaae Facllltles Quant. I Price Quant. I Cost 41,071.71 89,458.28 12,321.51 26,837.48 53,393.22 116,295.76 B C Private Bond Reduction* Improvements Quant. I 16,320 Quant. Cost Complete Cost 114,240.00 114,240.00 134,139.35 40,241.81 174,381.16 D E Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 6/30/2009 • • • • • • • • ' • • • • • • • • ' ' • • • Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Original bOnd computations prepared by: Name: Mark X. Plog, PE, PLS Date: 6/30/2009 PE Registration Number: 31976 Tel. #: 425-837-8083 Finn Name: GeoDatum, Inc. Address: 22525 SE 64th Pl, Suite 252, Issaquah, WA 98027 Project No: L04S00065 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS & DRAINAGE FACILITIES FINANCIAL GUARANTEE REQUIREMENTS PERFORMANCE BOND• PUBLIC ROAD & DRAINAGE AMOUNT BOND• AMOUNT MAINTENANCE/DEFECT BOND• REQUIRED AT RECORDING OR Stabilization/Erosion Sediment Control (ESC) (A) $ 19,422.3 TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY·- Existing Right-of-Way Improvements (B) $ 53,393.2 Future Public Road Improvements & Drainage Facilitie (C) $ 116,295.8 Private Improvements (D) $ 174,381.2 Calculated Quantity Completed (E) $ Total Right-of Way and/or Site Restoration Bond•r (First $7,500 of bond• shall be cash.) (A+B) $ 72,815.6 Performance Bond• Amount (A+B+C+D) = TOTAL (T) $ 363,492.5 Tx0.30 $ 109,047.7 OR M1mmum bond;; amount IS $1000. Reduced Performance Bond* Total *** (T-E) $ 363,492.5 Use larger of Tx30% or (l-E) Maintenance/Defect Bond* Total NAME OF PERSON PREPARING BOND" REDUCTION: "' NOTE: The word "bond" as used in this document means any financial guarantee acceptable to King County. -NOTE: KCC 27 A authorizes right of way and site restoration bonds to be combined when both are required. Date: (B+C) X 0.25 = $ 42,422.2 The restoration requirement shall inciude the total cost for all TESC as a minimum, not a maximum. In addition, corrective work, both on-and off-site needs to be included. Quantities shall reflect worse case scenarios not just minimum requirements. For example, if a salmonld stream may be damaged, some estimated costs for restoration needs to be reflected in this amount. The 30% contingency and mobilization costs are computed in this quantity. -NOTE: Per KCC 27A, total bond amounts remaining after reduction shall not be less than 30% of the original amount (T) or as revised by major design changes. SURETY BOND RIDER NOTE: If a bond rider is used, minimum additional performance bond shall be ! $ 290,676.9 !(C+D)-E REQUIRED BOND• AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND MODIFICATION BY DOES Page 9 of 9 bondqtywksht Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 6/30/2009 • I I I I I I I • • I I . , I I I I I I KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL STORMWATER FACILITY SUMMARY SHEET Number ___ ___._ ___ _ DOES Permit (provide one Stormwater Facility Summary Sheet per Natural Discharge Location) Downstream Drainage Basins Major Basin Name ------------- Immediate Basin Name ------------ Flow Control: Flow Control Facility Name/Number-------------- Facility Location -------------------------------- If none, Flow control provided in regional/shared facility (give location) ______________ --,- No flow control required Exemption number General Facility Information: Type/Number of detention facilities: Type/Number of infiltration facilities: ___ ponds ponds _....__ vaults tanks tanks trenches --- Control Structure Location! ~-tbc: , nu.+ Type of Control Structure __,,e~lS~t2......._C _________ Number of Orifices/Restrictions z._ Size of Orifice/Restriction: No. I No. 2 ~,....,8,...7+-+-<i 1-"">--- No. 3 ------- No. 4 -----,--- Flow Control Performance Standard L.e;, ,el Z, 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 1 ti912009 I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I I I I KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL Live Storage Volume /tJ 37() Number of Acres Served 6 r ,5': ;,.-, I Depth _ ____.,,,._,!...d_""-___ Volume Factor of Safety Number of Lots ----s-b,_,,.. ____ _ Dam Safety Regulations (Washington State Department of Ecology) Reservoir Volume above natural grade ______ _ Depth of Reservoir above natural grade ______ _ Facility Summary Sheet Sketch All detention, infiltration and water quality facilities must include a detailed sketch. ( 11 "x 17" reduced size plan sheets may be used) 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 1/9/2009 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL Water Quality: Type/Number of water quality facilities/BMPs: biofiltration swale --- (regular/wet/ or continuous inflow) large) ___ combined detention/wetpond large) above (wetpond portion basic or large) combined detention/wetvault --- ___ filter strip ___ flow dispersion ___ farm management plan ___ landscape management plan ___ oil/water separator (baffle or coalescing plate) Liner? --------- catch basin inserts: --- Manufacturer ___ sand filter (basic or large) ___ sand filter, linear (basic or ___ sand filter vault (basic or sand bed depth ___ (inches) stormwater wetland --- ___ storm filter ___ wetpond (basic or large) _J__ wetvault ___ Is facility Lined? If so, what marker is used -------------------- ___ pre-settling pond ___ pre-settling structure: Manufacturer ------------------- ___ high flow bypass structure (e.g., flow-splitter catch basin) source controls --- Design Information Water Quality design flow ------------- Water Quality treated volume (sandfilter) _______ _ Water Quality storage volume (wetpool) A;, b()B c:Q Facility Summary Sheet Sketch 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 3 1/9/2009 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL All detention, infiltration and water quality facilities must include a detailed sketch. (11 "x 17" reduced size plan sheets may be used) 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 4 1/9/2009 t ,. I I I I • • • ' , i I I , I I I I I I I 8 I ':'. "-w ~ C d ~ 0 I' ,t ~ ' ~ 6 ~ • -; i ~ J ~ " l u, / 0 ~ •• !§I ?1. DETENTION: REQUIRED 16,403 CF. PROPOSED 16,320 CF. WATER QUALITY: = REQUIRED 4,608 CF. PROPOSED 4,896 CF. SEE STRUClURAL VAULT PLANS FOR VAULT CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. ....,. FLOW INLET A• ..,_., ,_ ... ., j" i-1= 5"><10" GRAlED =·-Ra.I • 483.61 _I I "'' i I J _1 l I _,_ -1 -1- PLAN YJEW SCALE: 1"•10' HCRIZONlAL. -1-!- ~ W;;wr-SURFAa: El.EV. • 47i.ii) 1 _J 10' UVE ~4CE J ---= .__.,.....,,.~ ~ WATER QUALITY STOA4CE -1. --80!Il!U"f W4lEJI QUALITY~ ~ 4M.....!Q.__ 1" A\IERACt SEDIMENT STORAGE D { SECTION A SCAI..£: 1"•10' ltORIZCINTAL SCALE: \"•5' VERTICAL SE 1/4, SW 1/4, SEC 33, TWN 23N, RGE SE, W.M. e,,... ""1V; ... """' Ir ..... 9b. "'-" I _5'x10" GRATDl ACCESS PANEL. V W/ 2'X2" IIAINTEMANCE ACCESS ffl'. AA -, 4" • PERF PVC SJ '\.._ VAIJ!..T F"TG 0R.-MS EL 470.00 s·.,o· GRA1£0 """"'""'- --482.00 FLOW OUn..ET 461.311 A---+J Fl QW RfSTRICTOR NQTfS: 1. PF( SIZES, IH\OT [L£VATIONS, ORFIC£ SIZES, O\'ERFlOW ELEVATIONS AND ......... """' 2. W1l.ET CAPACTY: NOT LESS lHAN CXllllllNEll 1NLE1S. J. EXCEPT AS St.awN OR NO"ltil, UNITS SHALL 8E CONSlRUClED IN ACCCR0ANC£ VlllH 111£ REQUl!ElltNTS FOR CATOl BASIN T'IPE 2, ~-Mfi. DIAM. 4. PFE !l.ffORTS AND RESlRICTOR SHALL fl( or SMC[ IIA1ERlAL., AND BE AN040R[J) AT~ IIAX. SPACING BY '!f>/rt' DIAW. STAINLESS SIW. EXPANSOI 90l.TS (II D&DOED T IN "PU.. ~ TI-£ \UltlCAL RISER 5181 or TI-£ RESTICTOR SHAU. BE 1H[ SAIIIC DIAW. AS 1H[ HORIZONTAL OUll.ET PF'E. VlllH AN S-MIN. DIAW. I. FRAME AND LADDER CII STEPS OFf'SET SD lHAT: A. SHEAR GRA.lE IS WllBI.[ FR01i1 "!OP. 8. QJM8 DOW"' SPAa: IS ClLAR or ll!SER AND ..... ..,.,c C. F'ltAIIE IS a.u.R or Q.l!8. 7. F METAL OJT\.£T PFE <XHCECTS TO COIOfT CCHCRETE PIPE: OUll.ET PIP£ TO HAYE SMOOTH 0.0. EOUAL TO CONCRETE PW'E lO. LESS 1/4". 11. IIIUl.11-CIIIRCE EL80'IIIS MAY BE: LOCA1£0 AS SMOIIIIN (II ALL ON ONE SIDE OF RISER lO A$SlME LAllOER a.£AAANCE. 11. St£AII CRA1E HANDl.E SMAL.l. BE UTAOIEO lO I.AOOEJI/ S1£P I.OCAlEO .,... 24" ACCESS S£C110N. tO. F NO"IO-IED WIER IS USED IN UDJ or EUIOW, EW1'l..E SHAU. NOT OBSlRUCT ACCESS lO TI-£ SlR!JC1\IR[. .. T ~·-1~_ ± QUALITY ;;rCJRA« 479.00 \_ .... ffi, DRAIN. TYP I-__J_ -C ;lr-n I 5JE ..._:;:;_ PEJENTION \/AULT SECTION B SC4I..£: 1"•10' HORIZONTAl. 5C.ALE: 1"•5" ~TICAL ,· PA: SUPPClm {2 IIIN): J")(.(S".~~/~~ SEE:-NOlE 10 ANO 12 4" .. ~ SEE NOlE 11 SHEAR CRAlE ORJllCE .. o.87". ELEV.•4r.r..llO' IL--!---1Tt1 RISER :c;:00~~ O.SS"t1 EL.EV. 467.IID' 461..Jv' BOT1tlM Of 4'loS'J:4' '"""'" .... DEJENJJON YAYbI I SECJJQN c ·~ DETENTION VAIJI T NOTIS: 1. 8AfFl£ WAI.L :-0 CIWX VAIA.T INlO rM;) N'PROJOMATD.Y EQUAl. SIZE ctll.S. 2. -ONE Aca:55 MANHOI..[ PER CEl..L lllllH 4T I..E4ST ONE 4CCESS PEA SO" '141.l. T lDIGTH CII 'MOTH. J. PROVIDE W4TD! STOP AT All CAST-IN-Pl.AC£ WISTR\JCTION .K»ITS. l't!E-cAST VNJI.TS SttALl. HAVE 4PPRO\IED RUBBER CASl<ET STSlEM.. 4. VALILT !!HA1.L BE OE!i1GNED ANO ST,\l,lf'Q) BY A RECilSlEJl£D Sm.icn.RAL EJrlGIIEER. v ..... l.T 9fAU. BE ~ FOR HS--20 1RAfnC LOADNGS. IIINIIJll. All WETAL PARTS SKALJ._ BE CORROSKlN RESSTANT. 5. PROWlE L.AOt'Efl: RUNGS -allA.TD.Y ADJACENT TO ALL INL.EljOUTL£T PIF'£S. 6. AU N.ETS 1U FRST CELL 7. If" PROPOSED COVEJI IS CREAlEJI THAN 8. !'. ntEN IT W,JST BE 2.5' -..W NC> ACCESS MUST BE 48" ECCENlRIC a»€ S£T OV[R 24" DIAMETER ACCESS ~ NOTE: KING COUNTY DOES APPROVAL. IS FOR STORM AND ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ONLY AS SHOWN HEREON. KING COUNTY D.D.E.S. A..i... .,....; I CarnpMU,:I Dot,, -E¥-j Ccn,plolUd Dol<o IIW.T"-J.iii§.i.i.f'.L _,,,_,. Ai'PR(JYAl. -CALI. "8 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 I ~ l - ! E ! ::ll ~ +9: m~ /0)~ 0~ CD~ ~! ~ m~ it~ £~ill ~:: ¥ gj ~-M ~,~ ~I~ > I i i ~ ~ 0 ,¥ .... w z 5 5:g 5 0.. 0.. .... 0. g: !::; a: :c.., 0 l; ;i: :::, I C, • ~ (/) -z WO w (/)t--z z oz 0 0 NW F= .... ~c:: z :i: ~ "' 0 PROJECT I'«).: 09050 DES>WWAAWN A Schmidt ENGINEER/SUMYOR M.Plog SHEET C11 OF 12 I I I I I I I I I I I I I RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: DECLARA'JflI.ON OF COVENANT FOR l!NSPECTU:ON AND MAINTENANCE OF S1l'ORMW ATER FACILITIES AND BMPS Grantor: -------------- Grantee: King County Legal Description:--------------------------- Additional Legal(s) on:-------------------------- Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#:------------------------- INCONSIDERATION of the approved King County ___________ permit for application No. ---------relating to the real property ("Property") described above, the Grantor(s), the owner(s) in fee of that Property, hereby covenants(covenant) with King County, a political subdivision of the state of Washington and its municipal successors in interest and assigns ("King County" and "the County", or "its municipal successor"), that he/she(they) will observe, consent to, and abide by the conditions and obligations set forth and described in Paragraphs I through I 0 Fonn Revised 12/12/06 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ll ll I I I I below with regard to the Property, and hereby grants(grant) an easement as described in Paragraphs 2 and 3. Grantor(s) hereby grants(grant), covenants(covenant), and agrees(agree) as follows: I. The Grantor(s) or his/her(their) successors in interest and assigns ("Owners") shall at their own cost, operate, maintain, and keep in good repair, the Property's stormwater facilities and best management practices ("BMPs") identified in the plans and specifications submitted to King County for the review and approval of permit(s) #: -------------. Stormwater facilities include pipes, swales, tanks, vaults, ponds, and other engineered structures designed to manage storm water on the Property. Storm water BMPs include dispersion and infiltration devices, native vegetated areas, permeable pavements, vegetated roofs, rainwater harvesting systems, reduced impervious surface coverage, and other measures designed to reduce the amount of stormwater runoff on the Property. 2. King County shall have the right to ingress and egress over those portions of the Property necessary to perform inspections of the stormwater facilities and BMPs and conduct other activities specified in this Declaration of Covenant and in accordance with King County Code ("KCC") 9.04.120 or relevant municipal successor's codes as applicable. This right of ingress and egress, right to inspect, and right to perform required maintenance or repair as provided for in Section 3 below, shall not extend over those portions of the Property shown in Exhibit "A." 3. If King County determines that maintenance or repair work is required to be done to any of the stormwater facilities or BMPs, the Director of the Water and Land Resources Division or its municipal successor in interest ("WLR") shall give notice of the specific maintenance and/or repair work required pursuant to KCC 9.04.120 or relevant municipal successor's codes as applicable. The Director shall also set a reasonable time in which such work is to be completed by the Owners. If the above required maintenance or repair is not completed within the time set by the Director, the County may perform the required maintenance or repair, and hereby is given access to the Property, subject to the exclusion in Paragraph 2 above, for such purposes. Written notice will be sent to the Owners stating the County's intention to perform such work. This work will not commence until at least seven (7) days after such Form Revised 12/12/06 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ll notice is mailed. If, within the sole discretion of the WLR Director, there exists an imminent or present danger, the seven (7) day notice period will be waived and maintenance and/or repair work will begin immediately. 4. If at any time King County reasonably determines that a stormwater facility or BMP on the Property creates any of the hazardous conditions listed in KCC 9.04.130 or relevant municipal successor's codes as applicable and herein incorporated by reference, the WLR Director or equivalent municipal successors official may take measures specified therein. 5. The Owners shall assume all responsibility for the cost of any maintenance or repair work completed by the County as described in Paragraph 3 or any measures taken by the County to address hazardous conditions as described in Paragraph 4. Such responsibility shall include reimbursement to the County within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the invoice for any such work performed. Overdue payments will require payment of interest at the current legal rate as liquidated damages. If legal action ensues, the prevailing party is entitled to costs or fees. 6. The Owners are hereby required to obtain written approval from the King County WLR Director prior to filling, piping, cutting, or removing vegetation ( except in routine landscape maintenance) in open vegetated stormwater facilities (such as swales, channels, ditches, ponds, etc.), or performing any alterations or modifications to the stormwater facilities and BMPs referenced in this Declaration of Covenant. 7. Any notice or consent required to be given or otherwise provided for by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective upon personal delivery, or three (3) days after mailing by Certified Mail, return receipt requested. 8. With regard to the matters addressed herein, this agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, and all agreements whatsoever whether oral or written. 9. This Declaration of Covenant is intended to protect the value and desirability of the real property described above, and shall inure to the benefit of all the citizens of King County and its Fonn Revised 12/12/06 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I municipal successors and assigns. This Declaration of Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon Grantor(s), and Grantor's(s') successors in interest, and assigns. 10. This Declaration of Covenant may be terminated by execution of a written agreement by the Owners and King County or the municipal successor that is recorded by King County in its real property records. Form Revised 12/12/06 4 I I I I I I I I I I I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Declaration of Covenant for the Inspection and Maintenance of Storrnwater Facilities and BMPs is executed this __ day of ________ _, 20 . GRANTOR, owner of the Property GRANTOR, owner of the Property ST A TE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING )ss. On this day personally appeared before me: ------------------~to me known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein stated. Given under my hand and official seal this __ day of ________ _, 20 __ . Form Revised 12/12/06 Printed name Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires---------- 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • Appendix B -Construction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan £808·l£8 (9Zv) Lz:096 't/M 't.1Dnbess1 zsz: e1s ·1c1 411-0 3S szszz '\" -----ri 'I ' ' 89086 VM 'NO!N3!cl 3:JVld H!06 I 3S oiou • ! 1 --------· j j I I v; .., ci ci ~ z l a u ; ~ J ~ ~ w 5 w ~ a ~ a le ! "' z 0 I • u ~; ~= i 'iz'crl I~ gf~ ~ ~{@, I- I• I: ·-a~ .~ le i~ 'i--:- ""' ,_ g~ : ~1! 5 I:! 'i~ li g~ "0 a- j I ~1 ,i ~ • ~ l u z • "' a • w ~ ~ 5 ~ a " " ~ 6 a " ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ • I ~ ~ h t1i • ~: ~~ .5 -··· -•----· .. •--·--············· ··--· ---•---······ ··········----•----• •---• --•--•-...• ----·-·· •--•-- I • I I I I I I • • I I I Appendilc C -Short Plat Conditions of Approval I I I I I I I H1TONE SHORT PLAT· TIR 6/30/2009 PAGE 41 OF 46 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SHORT PLAT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. THE PROPOSAL SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL PLATIING PROVISIONS OF KING COUNTY TITLE 19A. 2. ALL PERSONS HAVING AN OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SHALL SIGN ON THE FACE OF THE FINAL SHORT SUBDIVISION. 3. ALL UTILITIES WITHIN PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY MUST BE INCLUDED WITHIN A FRANCHISE APPROVED BY THE KING COUNTY COUNCIL PRIOR TO FINAL SHORT PLAT RECORDING 4. 1998 KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL (SWDM) (KCC 9)-THE PROPOSED SHORT PLAT QUALIFIES FOR FULL DRAINAGE REVIEW AS OUTLINED IN CHAPTER ONE OF THE SWDM. FINAL SHORT PLAT APPROVAL SHALL REQUIRE FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE DRAINAGE PROVISIONS SET FORTH IN KING COUNTY CODE 9.04. A PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSED IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON SHALL PREPARE DRAINAGE PLANS AND A TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT AS OUTLINED IN CHAPTER 2 OF THE DRAINAGE MANUAL. THE DRAINAGE PLAN SUBMITIAL SHALL DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CORE AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS. COMPLIANCE MAY RESULT IN REDUCING THE NUMBER AND/OR LOCATION OF LOTS AS SHOWN ON THE PRELIMINARY APPROVED SHORT PLAT. PRELIMINARY REVIEW HAS IDENTIFIED THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, WHICH REPRESENT PORTIONS OF THE DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS. ALL OTHER APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN KCC 9.04 AND THE SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL (SWDM) MUST ALSO BE SATISFIED DURING ENGINEERING AND FINAL REVIEW. A. ENGINEERING PLANS AND ANALYSIS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE SWDM. PRIOR TO SHORT PLAT RECORDING, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT ENGINEERING PLANS TO ADDRESS THE REQUIRED SHORT PLAT IMPROVEMENTS. KING COUNTY APPROVAL OF DRAINAGE AND ROADWAY PLANS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. PERMIT FEES FOR REVIEW AND INSPECTION SHALL BE PAID AS REQUIRED BY COUNTY CODES AND POLICIES. BONDING FOR THE DRAINAGE PLANS WILL ALSO BE ESTABLISHED AS DETERMINED BY DOES PRIOR TO PLAN APPROVAL. AFTER RECEIVING DRAINAGE PLAN APPROVAL, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ODES LAND USE INSPECTION SECTION TO SCHEDULE A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING PRIOR TO PERFORMING WORK ON THE SITE. B. CURRENT STANDARD PLAN NOTES AND ESC NOTES, AS ESTABLISHED BY DOES ENGINEERING REVIEW SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS. C. THE FOLLOWING NOTE SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE FINAL RECORDED PLAT: "ALL BUILDING DOWNSPOUTS, FOOTING DRAINS, AND DRAINS FROM ALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACES SUCH AS PATIOS AND DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE PERMANENT STORM DRAIN OUTLET AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS# ON FILE WITH ODES AND/OR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. THIS ~PLA_N_S_H_A_L_L -BE-SUBMITIED WITH THE APPLICATION OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT. ALL CONNECTIONS OF THE DRAINS MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVAL. FOR THOSE LOTS DESIGNATED FOR PERFORATED STUB- OUTS, DISPERSION, OR INFILTRATION SYSTEMS, THE DESIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT THE TIME OF THE BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PLANS ON FILE." HITONE SHORT PLAT• TIR 6/30/2009 PAGE 42 OF 46 I I I I I I I I I I I I SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: THE CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN FOR THIS SHORT PLAT PROPOSES TO DISCHARGE SURFACE WATER RUN-OFF INTO A FUTURE PIPING SYSTEM. THE FUTURE PIPED CONVEYANCE WOULD BE CONSTRUCTED AND LOCATED ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTY TO THE EAST UNDER A PROPOSED SUBDIVISION APPLICATION. PRIOR TO ENGINEERING PLAN APPROVAL, THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE PROOF THAT ASSURES THE OFFSITE CONVEYANCE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AND LOCATED IN EASEMENTS WHERE APPROPRIATE. D. SHOULD THE PROPOSED OFFSITE CONVEYANCE NOT BE AVAILABLE AT ENGINEERING REVIEW, AND PRIOR TO PLAN APPROVAL THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A REVISION TO THIS APPLICATION WITH A NEW CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN. SINCE THIS WILL REQUIRE A SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE THIS PROJECT MAY BE RE-VEST TO THE CURRENT SWDM (20.20.080 KKC). 5. 1993 KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS (KCRS) (KCC 14)-FINAL SHORT .PLAT APPROVAL SHALL REQUIRE FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS SET FORTH·IN THE KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS (KCRS), INCLUDING ENGINEERING PLANS FOR ALL ROAD AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS. THE ENGINEERING PLANS SHALL BE PREPARED BY A PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSED IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. DDES STRONGLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE ENGINEERING PLANS BE SUBMITIED AT LEAST TWO YEARS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THE PROJECT. ALL CONSTRUCTION AND UPGRADING OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ROADS WITHIN THIS SHORT PLAT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY DDES (KCRS SECTIONL.03). A. THE PROPOSED ROAD AND CUL-DE SAC SERVING THE PROPERTY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO URBAN MINOR ACCESS STREET STANDARD PER KCRS, SECTION 2.03. IT SHALL EXTEND FROM 120" AVENUE SE AND CONTINUE INTO THE SITE TERMINATING INTO A CUL-DE-SAC BULB AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN PER KCRS SECTION 2.08. B. THE OFF-SITE PORTION OF THE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS MAY REMAIN IN THE EXISTING EASEMENT. A NOTE CONVEYING AN EQUALLY UNDIVIDED RESPONSIBILITY (TO EACH FUTURE LOT OWNER) FOR THE OFFSITE MAINTENANCE COST (FOR ROADWAY AND FACILITIES WITHIN THE EASEMENT) SHALL BE PLACED ON THE FINAL RECORDED MAP PAGE OR RECORDED SEPARATELY. ADDITIONALLY, THE NOTE SHALL INCLUDE A STATEMENT ALLOWING THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY TO BE MODIFIED IF AGREED TO BY ALL BENEFICIARIES OF THE ORIGINAL EASEMENT INCLUDING RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION TO A PUBLIC AGENCY. C. THE ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE PLACED IN A TRACT. THE TRACT SHALL BE AN UNDIVIDED OWNERSHIP TO THE LOTS IT SERVES, AND THE LOT OWNERS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS MAINTENANCE. D. THE PROPOSED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS SHALL ADDRESS THE REQUIREMENTS FOR ROAD SURFACING OUTLINED IN KCRS CHAPTER 4. AS NOTED IN SECTION 4.01 F, FULL WIDTH PAVEMENT OVERLAY IS REQUIRED WHERE WIDENING EXISTING ASPHALT. E. MODIFICATIONS TO THE ABOVE ROAD CONDITIONS MAY BE CONSIDERED BY KING COUNTY PURSUANT TO THE VARIANCE PROCEDURES IN KCRS 1.08. F. THE FOLLOWING NOTES SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE FINAL RECORDED SHORT SUBDIVISION: (1) ALL PRIVATE EASEMENTS AND/OR TRACTS TO BE MAINTAINED, REPAIRED, AND/OR REBUILT BY THE OWNERS OF THE PARCELS HAVING LEGAL ACCESS THERE FROM AND THEIR HITONE SHORT PLAT• TIR 6/30/2009 PAGE 43 OF 46 I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I I HEIRS, ASSIGNS OR SUCCESSORS, UNLESS AND UNTIL SUCH ROADS ARE IMPROVED TO KING COUNTY STANDARDS AND ARE DEDICATED AND ACCEPTED BY KING COUNTY FOR MAINTENANCE. (2) ALL RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS, TRACTS, AND THEIR PURPOSE SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE FINAL RECORDED SHORT SUBDIVISION. 6. HEAL TH (KCC 13)-THIS PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM FURTHER KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT REVIEW. HOWEVER, IF IMPROVEMENTS ARE REQUIRED FROM THE SEWER AND/OR THE WATER DISTRICT, THEN VERIFICATION SHALL BE REQUIRED FROM SAID DISTRICT($) THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN BONDED AND/OR INSTALLED, PRIOR TO FINAL RECORDING OF THE SHORT PLAT. 7. BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS (TITLE 16)-THE APPLICANT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF KCC 16.82. INCLUDING THE SIGNIFICANT TREE RETENTION REQUIREMENTS. 8. FIRE CODE (KCC 17)-SECTION 902 OF THE 1997 EDITION OF UNIFORM FIRE CODE THE APPLICANT MUST OBTAIN THE APPROVAL OF THE KING COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER FOR THE ADEQUACY OF THE FIRE HYDRANT, WATER MAIN AND FIRE FLOW STANDARDS OF CHAPTER 17.08 OF THE KING COUNTY CODE PRIOR TO THE FINAL SHORT PLAT APPROVAL. 9. DENSITY AND DIMENSIONS (KCC 21A.12) -ALL LOTS SHALL MEET THE DENSITY AND DIMENSIONS REQUIREMENTS OF THE R~ ZONE CLASSIFICATION OR SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE FACE OF THE APPROVED PRELIMINARY SHORT SUBDIVISION, WHICHEVER IS LARGER. MINOR REVISIONS TO THE SHORT SUBDIVISION, WHICH DO NOT RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES AND/OR DO NOT CREATE ADDITIONAL LOTS MAY BE APPROVED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. 10 STREET TREES (KCC 21A.16) -STREET TREES SHALL BE PROVIDED AS FOLLOWS (PER KCRS 5.03 AND KCC 21A.16.050): A. TREES SHALL BE PLANTED AT A RATE OF ONE TREE FOR EVERY 40 FEET OF FRONTAGE ALONG ALL ROADS. SPACING MAY BE MODIFIED TO ACCOMMODATE SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR DRIVEWAYS AND INTERSECTIONS. B. TREES SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AND PLANTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DRAWING NO. 5-009 OF THE 1993 KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS, UNLESS KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DETERMINES THAT TREES SHOULD NOT BE LOCATED IN THE STREET RIGHT -OF-WAY. C. IF KING COUNTY DETERMINES THAT THE REQUIRED STREET TREES SHOULD NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, THEY SHALL BE LOCATED NO MORE THAN 20 FEET FROM THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. D. THE TREES SHALL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE ABUTTING LOT OWNERS OR THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OR OTHER WORKABLE ORGANIZATION UNLESS THE COUNTY HAS ADOPTED A MAINTENANCE PROGRAM. OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE SHALL BE NOTED ON THE FACE OF THE FINAL RECORDED PLAT. E. THE SPECIES OF TREES SHALL BE APPROVED BY DOES IF LOCATED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF- WAY, AND SHALL NOT INCLUDE POPLAR, COTTONWOOD, SOFT MAPLES, GUM, ANY FRUIT- BEARING TREES, OR ANY OTHER TREE OR SHRUB WHOSE ROOTS ARE LIKELY TO OBSTRUCT SANITARY OR STORM SEWERS, OR THAT IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES. HtTONE SHORT PLAT -TIR 6/30/2009 PAGE 44 OF 46 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I F. THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A STREET TREE PLAN AND BOND QUANTITY SHEET FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY ODES PRIOR TO ENGINEERING PLAN APPROVAL. G. THE STREET TREES MUST BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED, OR A PERFORMANCE BOND POSTED PRIOR TO RECORDING OF THE PLAT. IF A PERFORMANCE BOND IS POSTED, THE STREET TREES MUST BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED WITHIN ONE YEAR OF RECORDING OF THE PLAT. AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, IF THE TREES ARE FOUND TO BE INSTALLED PER THE APPROVED PLAN, A MAINTENANCE BOND MUST BE SUBMITTED OR THE PERFORMANCE BOND REPLACED WITH A MAINTENANCE BOND, AND HELD FOR ONE YEAR. AFTER ONE YEAR, THE MAINTENANCE BOND MAY BE RELEASED AFTER DOES HAS COMPLETED A SECOND INSPECTION AND DETERMINED THAT THE TREES HAVE BEEN KEPT HEALTHY AND THRIVING. 11. SENSITIVE AREAS (KCC 21A.24)-THE SMALL SIZE CLASS ILL WETLAND LOCATED NEAR THE NORTHEAST PROPERTY LINE IS EXEMPT FROM THE SENSITIVE AREA REQUIREMENTS. 12. ROAD MITIQATION PAYMENT SYSTEM -THE APPLICANT OR SUBSEQUENT OWNER SHALL COMPLY WITH ROAD MITIGATION PAYMENT SYSTEM (MPS). KING COUNTY CODE 14.75, BY PAYING THE REQUIRED MPS FEE AND ADMINISTRATION FEE AS DETERMINED BY KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. THE APPLICANT HAS AN OPTION TO EITHER: A. PAY THE MPS FEE AT FINAL SHORT PLAT RECORDING. IF THIS OPTION IS CHOSEN, THE FEE PAID SHALL BE THE FEE IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF SHORT PLAT APPLICATION AND A NOTE SHALL BE PLACED ON THE FACE OF THE SHORT PLAT THAT READS, "ALL FEES REQUIRED BY KING COUNTY CODE 14.75, MITIGATION PAYMENT SYSTEM (MPS) HAVE BEEN PAID." OR B. PAY THE MPS FEE AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE. IF THIS OPTION IS CHOSEN, THE FEE PAID SHALL BE THE AMOUNT IN EFFECT AS OF THE DATE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. 13. RECREATION TRACT. KCC 21A.14-AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN, A RECREATION TRACT SHALL BE PROVIDED CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF KCC 21A.14.180 AND KCC 21A.14.190 (I.E., SPORT COURT[S), CHILDREN'S PLAY EQUIPMENT, PICNIC TABLE[S), BENCHES, ETC.). A DETAILED RECREATION SPACE PLAN (I.E., LANDSCAPE SPECS, EQUIPMENT SPECS, ETC.) CONSISTENT WITH KC 21A.16 SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY ODES AND KING COUNTY PARKS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL OF THE FINAL PLAT DOCUMENTS OR CONCURRENT WITH THE ENGINEERING REVIEW PHASE. THE RECREATION PLAN MUST SHOW ONLY A 10-FOOT WIDE EASEMENT WITHIN THE TRACT AS AGREED BY THE SOOS CREEK UTILITY DISTRICT. NO TOY STRUCTURE SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN THE 10-FOOT WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT. THE RECREATION TRACT SHALL BE FULLY FENCED. A PERFORMANCE BOND FOR RECREATION SPACE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE POSTED PRIOR TO RECORDING OF THE PLAT. 14. A HOMEOWNER'$ ASSOCIATION OR OTHER WORKABLE ORGANIZATION SHALL BE ESTABLISHED TO THE SATISFACTION OF DOES WHICH PROVIDES FOR THE OWNERSHIP AND CONTINUED MAINTENANCE OF THE RECREATION TRACT. 15. TO IMPLEMENT KCC 21A.38.230 WHICH APPLIES TO THE SITE, A DETAILED TREE RETENTION PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE ENGINEERING PLANS FOR THE SUBJECT PLAT. THE TREE RETENTION PLAN AND THE ENGINEERING PLANS SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF KCC 2114.38.230, AS WELL AS THE CONCEPTUAL TREE RETENTION PLAN WHICH IS PART OF THE HEARING RECORD FOR THIS PROJECT. NO CLEARING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS PERMITTED UNTIL THE FINAL TREE RETENTION PLAN IS APPROVED BY LUSD. FLAGGING AND TEMPORARY FENCING OF TREES TO BE RETAINED SHALL BE PROVIDED, CONSISTENT WITH KCC 21A.38.23084. THE PLACEMENT OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES, FILL MATERIAL, EXCAVATION WORK, OR THE STORAGE OF I I I I I CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS IS PROHIBITED WITHIN THE FENCED AREAS AROUND PRESERVED TREES, EXCEPT FOR GRADING WORK PERMITTED PURSUANT TO KCC 21A.38.230B4D(2). A NOTE SHALL BE PLACED ON THE FINAL PLAT INDICATING THAT THE TREES SHOWN TO BE RETAINED ON THE TREE RETENTION PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE FUTURE OWNERS OF THE PROPOSED LOTS, CONSISTENT WITH KCC 21A.38.230B6. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE TREE RETENTION PLAN SHALL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE FINAL ENGINEERING PLANS FOR THE SUBJECT PLAT. 16. THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED UNDER SEPA: IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS WITH RCW 58.17.110 (2), THE APPLICANT SHALL IMPROVE 120TH AVENUE SE, FROM THE PLAT ENTRANCE IN THE 19000 BLOCK NORTHWARD TO THE INTERSECTION OF SE 188TH STREET/ 120TH AVENUE SE BY PROVIDING A PAVED WALKWAY ALONG THE EASTWARD SIDE OF 120TH AVENUE SE. THE WALKWAY, PER SECTION 3.09 OF THE KCRS, SHALL BE SELECTED AND DESIGNED BY THE APPLICANT'S ENGINEER IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS, AND UPON APPROVAL BY DOES, CONSTRUCTED. A. A FULL WIDTH (8 FEET) PAVED SHOULDER B. A PAVED SHOULDER OF NO LESS THAN FOUR (4) FEET IN WIDTH, SEPARATED BY VEHICLE I TRAFFIC BY EITHER AN EXTRUDED CURB OR AN UNPAVED GRAVEL SHOULDER STRIP I I I I I I I I I I C. A CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, AND SIDEWALK SECTION i ,l :' ~ :.e --.~-·~~ 0 8 Online Search & Report Page I of 5 IF1illii1!lil;flim)J;11tim Pe rm it at a GI an ce @;J!lli@~ .~©1~. ~lm!Iall '-"'-~"'=-.-== ~D{illlii111.l~ ~----. __ ,_, __ , .. '.'. --,-=-------==·- ®ifflml{illlii111.l~ Cate~~ry descriptions Status definitions ____ Permit routing de!nitions_..,,.. Search tool improv~ment ~@,~IDF\Ff/l1l) litmmi)@,~ Enter permit jL04 S00 65 or file number: --~ or Parcel ID number (PIN}: I.=== __J (6-10 digits, e.g., 2123069016) I Submit J Title I Permit routing I Building inspection I Comments I Related permit activities I Title Details of the permit itself Status definitions ~iilliilii11%1iliililii'liil\ll~*JI I Proje~t t:io:JL04S006_5 J ~pplicant:iFORD ANTHONY TO TOP Status:jTRANSFER j Applicanf413 S 47TH Title· YEE SHORT PLAT 6---·--. address:' •• RENTON, WA 98055 __ _ ---··---· LOT_____ . Assig_ne_d_s_t.,.a_ff..,:;C_F_O_S ______ -l ._ __ P_e!mit \}'.po: Pf3_E::-SP --·--if----'C'-'o-"n-"tr..ca.c,_tc..co.c.r:..,i ----------! Sub-type: PRE-SP Contractor; · address:1 __ App1ieil10i,eiiec1,[12121,2004·········· Approval/Decision: 03/31/2006 Expiration Date: 03/31/2011 _____ _ Completed D_ate: 9_9/08/2009 Valuation:i$0.00 Location &iRN · ····· · · Desc,ii,1ion=1;~~:~tii1\oR 6_ _____ Juris.:!----------·--~-··--· CommunityiSOOS CREEK Plan:• Comp Plan:[URBAN RES 4-12AC . ,0, ·· · · Owner:!YEE PHILIP M & FANNY Y Parcel No:!6199000126 (Link to Parcel Viewer Map) Link to:!Property Report Districts 'Report iMap Permit routing ,0, Building Inspection function status Comments Keyword: I J Search keyword PermitsPlus TIBBITSC 12127/2004 INTAKE 6-LOT SHORT PLAT ON 12127/04; TIBBITSC 12127/2004 ROUTED FILE AND MATERIALS TO LUSD CURRENT PLANNING ON 12127/04; PLANRHUD 12128/2004 REVIEWED FILE AND ASSIGNED TO FERESHTEH DEHKORDI/PLANNER AND CURT FOSTER/ERU. REFERENCE TO L04P0002 IN THE FILE -NO RECORD OF PRE-APP BEING HELD. http ://info. kingcounty. gov /property /permits/Penni tG lance/ ( S( xmx I n4um O I xt3 lbgvfwrpx5... I 2/09/2009 Online Search & Report Page 2 of 5 ROGERSCA 1/18/2005 Notice of complete application letter and posting package sent 1/18/05 to DeEn Lang; application considered complete ala 1/17/05. Legal ads emailed to the Seattle Times and KC Journal for publ. on 1/24; NOA being mailed 211 to 50011.parcels. Comment period will end 2/25/05. Notice posted to the ODES web page. ROGERSCA 1/20/2005 File information routed 1/20/05 to Curt Foster/ERS, Ray Florent/SUR, Jim Ballweber & Bill Mudd/Fire; in-house screening mtg. scheduled for 2/8/05, 10:00 D44. ROGERSCA 2/1/2005 File information routed 211/05 to Fereshteh Dehkordi. ROGERSCA 2/212005 Affidavit of posting for application notice received 1/31/05; property posted 1/27/05. EICHHORNP 214/2005 FENG APPV'L IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO REQMTS OUTLINED IN THE FENG FILE LOCATED IN THE LUSD FOLDER ON THE "S" DRIVE PEDERSONJ 218/2005 Transfered routing package and changed routing screen to BENG. This prelim. plat applic. has S0-220 issues that will be reviewed by BENG. SIMMONSP 2117/2005 Sent comment to planner with concerns about improving the access easement. ROGERSCA 3/15/2005 Request for additional information letter sent 3/15/05; information due by 5/20/05. ROGERSCA 5/26/2005 Letter sent 5/26 to applicant extending deadline for additional information until 7/29/05. ENGELLB 8/1212005 I have made comments and routed back to planner. This will require a detailed significant tree retention plan at the Engineering stage. ROGERSCA 8/23/2005 Request for additional information letter sent 8/23/05; information due by 10/24/05. ROGERSCA 1/4/2006 · Letter sent to applicant extending deadline for additional information until 3/6/06. GOLLS 1/10/2006 submittal rcvd from Lang Assoc. via Priority Mail 1/09/06 but did not receive in CPLN/LUSD mail slot until 1/10/06 which is date routed on to assigned PPM II, F .Dehkordi ROGERSCA 1/19/2006 Letter sent 1/19/06 to applicant requesting additional information; due by 3/20/06. DEHKORDIF 3/16/2006 recieved requested information on March 1, 2006. ROGERSCA 3/31/2006 Report and Decision, combined with SEPA MONS, issued 3/31/06; preliminary approval granted, subject to conditions. Appeal period will end 4/24/06. Report, TD & NOD to pars; packages to Big9 agencies; TD & NOD to STR agencies; NOD to 50011.parcels. If no appeals are filed, preliminary approval will be effective a/a 3/31/06. Notice posted to the ODES web page. FOSTERC 4/24/2006 Engineering Plans Required ROGERSCA 5/5/2006 Preliminary file taken down to DOES 5/5/06 WOODCA 5/9/2007 Change of address made. 2648 15th Ave West Seattle, Wa 98116. Changed to 413 S 47th ST Renton, Wa 98055. Per property tax viewer. MOEJUD 11/21/2007 Drop off recvd 11/21/07 from Tony Ford, addressed & routed to PDYE. ADMIN 9/15/2008 As a result of a claim filed under the Tiger Mtn LLC vs King County lawsuit, a refund was remitted in the amount of $506.40. For detailed information contact DOES Finance Section. GOLLS 9/3/2009 FILE HAS BEEN BOXED UP WITH APPROVED REC PLAN L01MI051 & ENGR FILES L07SR017 AND L09SR015 TO BE TRANSFERRED PER CITY OF RENTON REQUEST VIA P.ADAMS TO RENTON AS OF 9/09 CARLSONJ 9/8/2009 CARLSONJ changed status to TRANSFER on 09/08/2009 (added by script) CARLSONJ 9/8/2009 file to the city of renton WOODCA 11/23/2009 Refund in the amount of $2890.61 tranfered to City of Renton. Will forward refund check to Kim S once I receive it from downtown. http ://info .kingcounty. gov /property/permits/Penni tG lance/ ( S( xmxln4um0 I xt3 lbgvfwrpx5... 12/09/2009 Online Search & Report PRMS routing PINTCTIB 12/27/2004Added to Project Management PINTCTIB 12/27/2004 FINISHED at Permit Center ROGERSCA 1/18/2005 FINISHED at Complete Application ROGERSCA 1/18/2005 Complete application a/o 1/17/05 ROGERSCA 1/18/2005 STARTED at Notice Of Application ROGERSCA 1/18/2005 NOA to be mailed 2/1/05 ROGERSCA 1/18/2005 RECEIVED at Complete Application ROGERSCA 1/18/2005 STARTED at Current Planning Review ROGERSCA 1/20/2005 Routed file information ROGERSCA 1/20/2005 Review added ROGERSCA 1/20/2005 QUEUED at Land Use Engineering ROGERSCA 1/20/2005 QUEUED at Land Use Survey Review ROGERSCA 1/20/2005 Routed file information ROGERSCA 1/20/2005 Routed file information ROGERSCA 1/20/2005 QUEUED at Grading Unit EICHHORNP 1/21/2005 QUEUED at Fire Engineering ROGERSCA 2/1/2005 FINISHED at Notice Of Application ROGERSCA 2/1/2005 Mailed NOA 2/1/05 EICHHORNP 2/4/2005 STARTED at Fire Engineering EICHHORNP 2/4/2005 FINISHED at Fire Engineering SIMMONSP 2/17/2005 FINISHED at Land Use Survey Review SIMMONSP 2/17/2005 comments CLAUSSENK2/28/2005 BUDGET LOCKED CHESHIERB 3/7/2005 FINISHED at Engineer Technician CHESHIERB 3/7/2005 rpt copy to main,cfos,fdeh,wetl ROGERSCA 3/15/2005 req.addtl info; due by 5/20/05 FOSTERC 5/13/2005 WAITOTHR at Land Use Engineering ENGELLB 8/12/2005 FINISHED at Grading Unit DEHKORDIF 8/17/2005 STARTED at Resubmittal DEHKORDIF 8/17/2005 receive info DEHKORDIF 8/17/2005 no geo issues CLAUSSENK 10/12/2005change sa to wl CLAUSSENK 10/12/2005 BUDGET RE-LOCKED DEHKORDIF 1/11/2006 routed add inf this day DEHKORDIF 1/11/2006 add info was routed today SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 SETUP at Resubmittal SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 FINISHED at Resubmittal SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 na DEHKORDIF 1/11/2006 received add info 1/09/06 SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 QUEUED at Land Use Engineering SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 na SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 Routed add"I info to CFOS SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 na SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 RECEIVED at Current Planning Review SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 STARTED at Current Planning Review SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 FINISHED at Project Manage Prag SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 payment recvd 4/5/05 FOSTERC 1/17/2006 Rec"d submittal 1-9-6. Not complete. FOSTERC 1/17/2006 Responce mailed 1-18-6 ROGERSCA 1/19/2006 req more info; due by 3/20/06 ROGERSCA 1/19/2006 not applicable at this time ROGERSCA 1/19/2006 not applicable at this time ROGERSCA 1/19/2006 not applicable at this time DEHKORDIF 3/2/2006 recieved revison DEHKORDIF 3/2/2006 RECEIVED at Current Planning Review DEHKORDIF 3/2/2006 error DEHKORDIF 3/2/2006 error Page 3 of 5 http ;//in fo.kingcounty .gov /property /permits/Permi tG I ance/ (S ( xmxln4um O I xt3 lbgvfwrpx5... 12/09/2009 Online Search & Report Page 4 of 5 ,e, DEHKORDIF 3/212006 RECEIVED at Resubmittal DEHKORDIF 3/2/2006 received revision DEHKORDIF 3/212006 FINISHED at Resubmittal DEHKORDIF 3/212006 error DEHKORDIF 3/2/2006 RECEIVED at Current Planning Review DEHKORDIF 3/212006 error DEHKORDIF 3/212006 RECEIVED at Resubmittal DEHKORDIF 3/2/2006 FINISHED at Current Planning Review DEHKORDIF 3/2/2006 error DEHKORDIF 3/212006 error FOSTERC 3/17/2006 FINISHED at Land Use Engineering FOSTERC 3/17/2006 Routed draft PA to Fereshteh. ROGERSCA 3/31/2006 FINISHED at Resubmittal ROGERSCA 3/31/2006 FINISHED at Notice of Decision ROGERSCA 3/31/2006 FINISHED at Current Planning Review CLAUSSENK4/6/2006 red CLAUSSENK4/6/2006 BUDGET RE-LOCKED MOFFITIC 5/24/2006 Date complete entered for Milestone 1. MOFFITIC 5/24/2006 Final processing triggered for Finance. MOFFITIC 5/24/2006 Date complete entered for Milestone 2. MOFFITIC 5/24/2006 Date complete entered for Milestone 4. MOFFITIC 5/24/2006 Date complete entered for Milestone 3. PRMS clock PINTCTIB 12127/2004 SYSTEM auto-started preclock at Permit Center ROGERSCA 1/18/2005 FINISHED at CAPP ROGERSCA 3/15/2005 WAITCUST at Current Planning Review SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 add info received 01/09/06 SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 DELETED at RSUB ROGERSCA 1/19/2006 WAITCUST at Current Planning Review DEHKORDIF 3/212006 RECEIVED at RSUB SYSTEM 3/16/2006 14 pre-clock period expired. SYSTEM 4/1/2006 Clock Approved. Permit Status: WAIT-APL PRMS Milestone No comments available for L04S0065 Related permit activities on parcel For more information about categories and statuses used on reports, see: • Category descriptions for a list composition types and sub-types for each report grouping. Also refer to each permit type for additional details. • Status definitions for general definitions for statuses such as pending, approved, finaled, etc. Permit routing status definitions for general definitions for statuses that are used by PRMS -Permit routing management system. Please e-mail questions or comments to DDESWeblnguiries@kinqcounty.gov. Permit information I FAQ j Maps & property research I Forms & publications I Codes policies & growth management I Code Enfor ----·--·-------· Home I Privacy I Accessibility I Terms of use I Search http://info.kingcounty.gov/property/permits/PermitGlance/(S(xmxln4um01xt31bgvfwrpx5... 12/09/2009 Online Search & Report Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. © 2009 King County Page 5 of5 http://info.ki ngcounty. gov /property /perrni ts/Perrni tG lance/( S( xmx ln4um0 I xt3 lb gvfwrpx5... 12/09/2009 Online Search & Report --------- ~®W!I ~@/~ --- ~/£ill!@ ·•·...e·=c·c.=:.=..=··=-•----•c"·-- Nltilliiilllm ~ --:rr_.s=~==---·-"' ~O(il!Ilii11]~ Reports notes Category descriptions ;""-----~ ... -"., ___ ....,,,.,.,...,_,,. ..... -, Status definitions j Permit-routing definitions ) ·---···~------···---:; --····-----··-----·---~ ---···· Search tool improvement --~ommro ------• OOililillil~f€1ii'iNll1il ~~(illll1)lil;ffl Page I of 5 Permit at a Glance Enter permit jL04S 0065 1 or file number:-----------· or Parcel ID number (PIN): l. _______ __j (6-10 digits, e.g., 2123069016) r Sllbmit '·I Title I Permit routing I Building inspection I Comments I Related permit activities I Title Details of the permit itself Status definitions I ~ ~roj~ilt~jJt~~~f~R _ ·. I ··· ··· ~:~\f;;~;i=j3R~:~~H~TNY TO TOP Title:JYLOETE SHORT PLAT 6-address:fRENTON, WA 98055 Assigned staff::CFOS · e-__ ,Permit t~e.!'_JPRE-SP Corrtractor:\ ----I ----------Sub-type:[PRE-SP ------· ----------Contractor, ·-··············--· -,--_ _ _____ address:!_ __________ -·--·-·--·-·-··-···---·-···-·--·----·--, b-Applied/Opened:jt2127/2004 --------L.-; m illi/Ndr , -~ ~~~=~~~:f~!~~--= ,0, Descrlption:1:~6~~~6..~\oR 6-·c·om·m~~~fyisoos CREEK ________ _ '°" 1-~1:~~:~s,m !Parcel Viewer Map,__i __ 1 Link !o:IProperty Report Districts I Report iMap Permit routing ,0, Building inspection function status Comments Keyword: I __ _ ______ j S~arch'keyword PermitsPlus TIBBITSC 12/27/2004 INTAKE 6-LOT SHORT PLAT ON 12/27/04; TIBBITSC 12/27/2004 ROUTED FILE AND MATERIALS TO LUSD CURRENT PLANNING ON 12127/04; PLANRHUD 12/28/2004 REVIEWED FILE AND ASSIGNED TO FERESHTEH DEHKORDI/PLANNER AND CURT FOSTER/ERU. REFERENCE TO L04P0002 IN THE FILE -NO RECORD OF PRE-APP BEING HELD. http://info.kingcounty.gov/property/permi ts/Penni tG lance/ ( S( xmx ln4 um O I xt3 lb gvfwrpxS... 12/09/2009 Online Search & Report Page 2 of 5 ROGERSCA 1/18/2005 Notice of complete application letter and posting package sent 1/18/05 to DeEn Lang; application considered complete a/o 1/17/05. Legal ads emailed to the Seattle Times and KC Journal for pub!. on 1/24; NOA being mailed 2/1 to 50011.parcels. Comment period will end 2/25105. Notice posted to the DOES web page. ROGERSCA 1/20/2005 File information routed 1/20/05 to Curt Foster/ERS, Ray Florent/SUR, Jim Ballweber & Bill Mudd/Fire; in-house screening mtg. scheduled for 2/8/05, 10:00 D44. ROGERSCA 2/1/2005 File information routed 2/1/05 to Fereshteh Dehkordi. ROGERSCA 2/2/2005 Affidavit of posting for application notice received 1/31/05; property posted 1/27/05. EICHHORNP 2/4/2005 FENG APPV'L IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO REQMT'S OUTLINED IN THE FENG FILE LOCATED IN THE LUSD FOLDER ON THE "S" DRIVE PEDERSONJ 2/8/2005 Transfered routing package and changed routing screen to BENG. This prelim. plat applic. has S0-220 issues that will be reviewed by BENG. SIMMONSP 2/17/2005 Sent comment to planner with concerns about improving the access easement. ROGERSCA 3/15/2005 Request for additional information letter sent 3/15105; infonnation due by 5/20105. ROGERSCA 5/26/2005 Letter sent 5/26 to applicant extending deadline for additional infonnation until 7/29/05. ENGELLB 8/12/2005 I have made comments and routed back to planner. This will require a detailed significant tree retention plan at the Engineering stage. ROGERSCA 8/23/2005 Request for additional information letter sent 8/23/05; infonnation due by 10/24/05. ROGERSCA 1/4/2006 Letter sent to applicant extending deadline for additional infonnation until 3/6106. GOLLS 1110/2006 submittal rcvd from Lang Assoc. via Priority Mail 1/09/06 but did not receive in CPLN/LUSD mail slot until 1/10/06 which is date routed on to assigned PPMII, F.Dehkordi ROGERSCA 1/1912006 Letter sent 1/19/06 to applicant requesting additional infonnation; due by 3/20/06. DEHKORDIF 3/16/2006 recieved requested infonnation on March 1, 2006. ROGERSCA 3/31/2006 Report and Decision, combined with SEPA MONS, issued 3/31/06; preliminary approval granted, subject to conditions. Appeal period will end 4/24/06. Report, TD & NOD to pars; packages to Big9 agencies; TD & NOD to STR agencies; NOD to 50011.parcels. If no appeals are filed, preliminary approval will be effective a/o 3/31/06. Notice posted to the DOES web page. FOSTERC 4/24/2006 Engineering Plans Required ROGERSCA 5/512006 Preliminary file taken down to DOES 5/5/06 WOODCA 5/9/2007 Change of address made. 2648 15th Ave West Seattle, Wa 98116. Changed to 413 S 47th ST Renton, Wa 98055. Per property tax viewer. MOEJUD 11/21/2007 Drop off recvd 11121/07 from Tony Ford, addressed & routed ADMIN GOLLS to PDYE. 9/15/2008 As a result of a claim filed under the Tiger Min LLC vs King County lawsuit, a refund was remitted in the amount of $506.40. For detailed information contact DOES Finance Section. 913/2009 FILE HAS BEEN BOXED UP WITH APPROVED REC PLAN L01MI051 & ENGR FILES L07SR017 AND L09SR015 TO BE TRANSFERRED PER CITY OF RENTON REQUEST VIA P.ADAMS TO RENTON AS OF 9109 CARLSONJ 9/8/2009 CARLSONJ changed status to TRANSFER on 09/08/2009 CARLSONJ WOODCA (added by script} 9/8/2009 file to the city of renton 11/23/2009 Refund in the amount of $2890.61 tranfered to City of Renton. Will forward refund check to Kim S once I receive it from downtown. http://info.kingcounty.gov/property/permits/PermitGlance/(S(xmxln4um01xt3lbgvfwrpx5... 12/09/2009 Online Search & Report PRMS routing PINTCTIB 12127/2004Added to Project Management PINTCTIB 12/27/2004 FINISHED at Permit Center ROGERSCA 1/18/2005 FINISHED at Complete Application ROGERSCA 1/18/2005 Complete application a/o 1/17/05 ROGERSCA 1/18/2005 STARTED at Notice Of Application ROGERSCA 1/18/2005 NOA to be mailed 211/05 ROGERSCA 1/18/2005 RECEIVED at Complete Application ROGERSCA 1/18/2005 STARTED at Current Planning Review ROGERSCA 1/20/2005 Routed file information ROGERSCA 1/20/2005 Review added ROGERSCA 1/20/2005 QUEUED at Land Use Engineering ROGERSCA 1/20/2005 QUEUED at Land Use Survey Review ROGERSCA 1/20/2005 Routed file information ROGERSCA 1/20/2005 Routed file information ROGERSCA 1/20/2005 QUEUED at Grading Unit EICHHORNP 1/21/2005 QUEUED at Fire Engineering ROGERSCA 211/2005 FINISHED at Notice Of Application ROGERSCA 211/2005 Mailed NOA 211/05 EICHHORNP 214/2005 STARTED at Fire Engineering EICHHORNP 214/2005, FINISHED at Fire Engineering SIMMONSP 2117/2005 FINISHED at Land Use Survey Review SIMMONSP 2117/2005 comments CLAUSSENK2128/2005 BUDGET LOCKED CHESHIERB 3/7/2005 FINISHED at Engineer Technician CHESHIERB 3nt2005 rpt copy to main,cfos,fdeh,wetl ROGERSCA 3/15/2005 req.addtl info; due by 5/20/05 FOSTERC 5/13/2005 WAITOTHR at Land Use Engineering ENGELLB 8/1212005 FINISHED at Grading Unit DEHKORDIF 8/17/2005 STARTED at Resubmittal DEHKORDIF 8/17/2005 receive info DEHKORDIF 8/17/2005 no geo issues CLAUSSENK 10/12/2005change sa to wl CLAUSSENK 10/12/2005 BUDGET RE-LOCKED DEHKORDIF 1/11/2006 routed add inf this day DEHKORDIF 1/11/2006 add info was routed today SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 SETUP at Resubmittal SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 FINISHED at Resubmittal SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 na DEHKORDIF 1/11/2006 received add info 1/09/06 SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 QUEUED at Land Use Engineering SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 na SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 Routed add"I info to CFOS SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 na SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 RECEIVED at Current Planning Review SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 STARTED at Current Planning Review SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 FINISHED at Project Manage Prog SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 payment recvd 4/5/05 FOSTERC 1/17/2006 Rec"d submittal 1-9-6. Not complete. FOSTERC 1/17/2006 Responce mailed 1-18-6 ROGERSCA 1/19/2006 req more info; due by 3/20/06 ROGERSCA 1/19/2006 not applicable at this time ROGERSCA 1/19/2006 not applicable at this time ROGERSCA 1/19/2006 not applicable at this time DEHKORDIF 3/2/2006 recieved revison DEHKORDIF 3/212006 RECEIVED at Current Planning Review DEHKORDIF 3/2/2006 error DEHKORDIF 3/212006 error Page 3 of 5 http ://info. kingcounty. gov /property /permits/Penni !Glance/( S( xmx ln4 umO I xt3 lbgvfwrpx5... 12/09/2009 Online Search & Report Page 4 of 5 .0, DEHKORDIF 3/2/2006 RECEIVED at Resubmittal DEHKORDIF 3/2/2006 received revision DEHKORDIF 3/2/2006 FINISHED at Resubmittal DEHKORDIF 3/2/2006 error DEHKORDIF 3/2/2006 RECEIVED at Current Planning Review DEHKORDIF 3/2/2006 error DEHKORDIF 3/2/2006 RECEIVED at Resubmittal DEHKORDIF 3/2/2006 FINISHED at Current Planning Review DEHKORDIF 3/2/2006 error DEHKORDIF 3/2/2006 error FOSTERC 3/17/2006 FINISHED at Land Use Engineering FOSTERC 3/17/2006 Routed draft PA to Fereshteh. ROGERSCA 3/31/2006 FINISHED at Resubmittal ROGERSCA 3/31/2006 FINISHED at Notice of Decision ROGERSCA 3/31/2006 FINISHED at Current Planning Review CLAUSSENK4/6/2006 red CLAUSSENK4/6/2006 BUDGET RE-LOCKED MOFFITIC 5/24/2006 Date complete entered for Milestone 1. MOFFITIC 5/24/2006 Final processing triggered for Finance. MOFFITIC 5/24/2006 Date complete entered for Milestone 2. MOFFITIC 5/24/2006 Date complete entered for Milestone 4. MOFFITIC 5/24/2006 Date complete entered for Milestone 3. PRMS clock PINTCTIB 12/27/2004 SYSTEM auto-started preclock at Permit Center ROGERSCA 1/18/2005 FINISHED at CAPP ROGERSCA 3/15/2005 WAITCUST at Current Planning Review SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 add info received 01/09/06 SANDERSJ 1/11/2006 DELETED at RSUB ROGERSCA 1/19/2006 WAITCUST at Current Planning Review DEHKORDIF 3/2/2006 RECEIVED at RSUB SYSTEM 3/16/2006 14 pre-clock period expired. SYSTEM 4/1/2006 Clock Approved. Permit Status: WAIT-APL PRMS Milestone No comments available for L04S0065 Related permit activities on parcel For more information about categories and statuses used on reports, see: • Category descriptions for a list composition types and sub-types for each report grouping. Also refer to each permit type for additional details. • Status definitions for general definitions for statuses such as pending, approved, finaled, etc. Permit routing status definitions for general definitions for statuses that are used by PRMS -Permit routing management system. Please e-mail questions or comments to DDESWeblnquiries@kinqcounty.gov. I Permit information I FAQ I Maps & property research I Forms & publications I Codes policies & growth management I Code Enfor Home I Privacy I Accessibility I Terms of use l Search http ://info .kingcounty. gov /property /permi ts/Permi tG lance/(S ( xmxln4um0 I xt3 lbgvfwrpx5... 12/09/2009 Online Search & Report Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. © 2009 King County Page 5 of5 http://info.kingcounty.gov/property/permits/PermitGlance/(S(xmxln4um0lxt31bgvfwrpx5... 12/09/2009 ~------------------------···----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------·------· -----------' -------·----------· ------------,c,-_ - i , ------------------·-------1 S7 & --·-·If--------------------- SCALE: 1" 30' 3634 I I I , ~----- Sr~ 1 21 - . , I ' i , I . , · I I I 1· I I . 167655 · 2 l I I I I I I I l ~ ffi~ I I =->.""1----l f ' ' ''L - • r OHP--i;:r"'i-/--+---pp W/ \0 X-FER 1 ' 1r .. 1A1 I . ~ lif-- J +- I ' I ·1 I I I [I I ii / , IT '1 ,, i ' t,2 .......______. __ I I I I I I t ' \ 11 ' I I ' i I 318284 167656 ? I I I ! j E)U_1)' ~ , i ft:11 . \ I I \ I __ ~,-·-------& Ii ' "' -.. ( I '-l-R-ll C' T J! II I · ~--------' "-, S TOR;t;/ DRA/JVA GE ~')L •.: I 11 IL ~-~--11 ' I --=-=-=====~2-r , I i . 1!/· Tl --'13ift-'l-Pl'NB=-'Rc7 ~~~fr 1 0 CJ. 0 5 --jo,,f--.._ X-F E R I i ·-/ '° ' ,1 ' 1 II ( I ii I I n ' ~-----10 I I. j' I ~ I iC I I': ( I i I .Uf j -~ • r- ' c C - I' f-----------------------------] I I ii ,3182 1676 69 I I , I I ______ ~ ------~- I < I I I Ni ,--; 55 --- , EL2 1 = '----~------ y T---t 6 ' 1 -,_.,_ __ , ____ . ________ ,,. --~--__l~.~--- LX i ---_,_. -··-------- I 3 --I Ir n ---L-,_____.,4':__L_, I] i:; J __ ~ \ I , I ' ' I I i I I I I -... -I 8 , I I I , 7 6 I I I 1 I I ! I I I 11 I i 1,'o 1 / I e,---1\/ , • I I I J ! l ------£, I j ~r l 0), )7 I II co , . 0 N I 12 I I I 11 ' (X) VJ 15' "·WER i J[. ' . -------LD. _____ . ----·---------------· Street Light Tables . Existing Street Light Tables ! ' i ! !SL# TAG# uRID# i POLF ~; I I ! LU!\1IG!Jl.lRE AIRM ! .:n i ! ! , --·--------- I I ' SL# iTAG# GRID# POLE MH ' I - i ! I I 318301 EXISTING PSE 30' i 250WHPS 14' I SL1 ! I --·-·-- J COBRAFLAT , 167655 WOOD I I EL1 I 318284. EXISTING PSE -I ' 167656 WOOD i I I 318269 EXISTING PSE EL2 I 167655 WOOD - i I ·---~--------·------·-·--~ ---------------~-----·--· ----------- LILJfvl,INA!RE ARM --- 250WHPS 14' COBRAFLAT 250WHPS I ! ! 14' i COBRAFLAT I I INTOLIGHT STREET LIGHT NOTES ALL STREET LIGHTING POLES ARE TO BE INSTALLED PER STANDARD 6375.4800 (page #2) IN THE "LINE WORK PRACTICES MANUAL". ALL POLES (WOOD, CONCRETE OR FIBERGLASS) ARE TO BE SET PLUMB AND EMBEDDED TO THE GROUND LINE MARKED ON THE POLE. BACKFILL AROUND POLE WITH 5/8" MINUS GRAVEL AND COMPACT IN 6" LIFTS. (PEA GRAVEL AND NATIVE SOILS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.) APPROXIMATELY 1 CU. YD. OF 5/8" MINUS CRUSHED ROCK WILL BE REQUIRED. THE DEVELOPER IS REQUIRED TO SUPPLY AND INSTALL PLASTIC (NON PAPER) STREET LIGHT TUBES (MINIMUM 18" DIAMETER) TO AID IN THE INSTALLATION OF THE STREET LIGHTING POLES. THE DEVELOPER MUST ALSO SUPPLY THE REQUIRED 5/8" MINUS GRAVEL AT EACH STREET LIGHT LOCATION. IN ALL SHOEBOX AND COBRAHEAD INSTALLATIONS, THE LUMINAIRE MUST BE LEVELED. DEVELOPER MUST SUPPLY DURABLE LID/COVER AT EACH STREET LIGHT TUBE . Plan View Detail of Street Light Tube Vv'ira Entrance -Street Light Slot-_ Tube ~ . Field 45° Road Side . --\-4-5°-4-----+ )~S~lde~ / , ___ _/ 'Mre Entrance Slot s·-0 11 Field Side 311 X 6u I/Vire Entrance Slot [ Street light tube -set 2" below grade. 26" Road Side Position 3" x a~ 'hire entrance slot 45 degre-es left or right from a !inei perpendicular to road- way through center of tube. Poles that are 15' MH use 4' lube. 45' STREET LIGHT TUBE DETAIL 00 rn:©rn:UW@@) JAN 't. 7 2009 K.C. D.D.E.S, FOREMAN (CHECK BOX WHEN COMPLETED) 0 Sb'MI.Uit,b Er,,o~i;:e,td :.J PSE EqLlipm,lri LOCKEIYSE~RED 5. Well( Aru. i.tt in a...EAt.'SAFE c«dlicln. =· Grid, Cat., an<l Sw,t~h r,Lfflb.a INSTAUEO l V'ERIFlED.--··-- :J Flold Chan~ P.EO.Ut£0"" A:t-b.it. 2 Mlll9111l VERIFIED arid CHANGES notgd on ~peNl(lri,; CJ CGrnP",~ 10,:, RECORCtD In corm locdon Ql'!A«ul. 0 hxh,::flf <;Ql'l.,;t F:W>E SLZE on AHl'JM l 1/ERlfYJ:ro!JfiP~.§:~ 0 ~ o.c Cti.cklla~~l ~-0 Dllvbl.t!,on,i ncad on th.a AHILil am !heir __ D ! ee!1tfy ti..t Iha ;,,,on( pelform9d /T\'N<II PSE'1 ltandardl and prool(UN Ind that •JI QIJ•lity requntllllft& .. rr.t ·---··---·· PROJECT PHASE NOTIF# ORDER# PWR St Light X ---- CIC ! Relocation , , Removal I CABLElV ., ____ PHONE ---·· -- Proj&ct Manager Contact lnfonnation: STEVE AVIS 206-991).1514 Call Phone ·--- "Locatq Required" Yes O No 00 "Outages Required'' Yea D No 00 "Flagging Required" Yes O No DI 18" -Minimum Vicinity Map THOMAS GUIDE PAGE 657 A-1 i I . i ' ' ' I I Owner I DeveloperContii.ctJnfo---~ ! ATTN: 253-630-3945 office i : Fcr contacts be-l-ow-d-ial-1--888--~CAL-L ~PS-E-(2-25--577-§!ALLfl!OO) 424-556! 2 BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG THIS SKETCH NOT TO BE REUED UPON FOR EXACT LOCATION OF EXISTING FACILITIES ~D ·-·· --- NEW BUSINESS D CORRECTIVE/ REAL ESTATE/EASEMENT PERMIT 10 DAY WAIVED NIA N/A -- 3 FUNCTION CONTACT PHONE NO I DATE -----·-----··-··-- 2 ACCOUNT MGR Jim Kennedy 425--45&-2978 ---I ---- 1 ENGR-POWER Mike Hammons 425--45&-2602 ~ --·--··--REV# BY DESCRIPTION ENGR-GAS - ' --COUNTY ·EmerS&et Gas Wk Ctr POWER WK CTR DRAWN BY Mike Hammons 425--456-2602 1/22/09 1--,o· --·--···-·--· KING SKC--SVC --CHECKED BY I -···-····---·-·--· - iOPMAP -1/4 SEC PLAT MAP APPROVED BY , ··---i ·---- NIA FOREMAN#1 ... --·· ,- lCIRCUIT NO -·--· ------- U-MAP NO (POWER) 'OHCKT MAP UGCKTMAP FOREMAN#2 , ------------, --~-~ i NIA MAPPING ' ·--l-~ ------•. ___ i ---· ---- JOINT FACILITIES ARRANGEMENTS --··-· -·----·i'------- UTILITIES N/A NIA NIA i NIA , - CONTACT N/A NIA NIA I N/A -- PHONE#; N/A N/A N/A N/A I ··-----------·-·-··-·· - PUGET INCIDENT MAOP l PLEASANT PATH FRONTAGE ! SOUND STREET LIGHT DESIGN Gas OnJer Elect Order i -------ENERGY ------~~~DESIGNED BY: l_moLlgh_t APPROX 12204 148 AVE SE RENTON, WA SCALE --jPAGE 1 " = 30'_______J____! of 1 ------------------------ ·-··------ I SPECIAL INSPECTION GENERAL: SPECIAL INSPECTION BY A QUALIFIED INSPECTOR IS REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2006 IBC AS ADOPTED BY KING COUNTY ON THE FOLLOWING ITEMS. a, CONCRETE STRENGTH AND PLACEMENT b. REINFORCING BAR PLACEMENT QUALiFiCATiON: THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR SHALL BE A QUALIFIED PERSON WHO SHALL DEMONSTRATE COMPETENCE, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. DISTRillUTION OF REPORTS: SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO FURNISH INSPECTION REPORTS TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND SITE STRUCTURES, AND SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT STATING WHETHER THE 1NORK REQUIRING SPECIAL INSPECTION WAS COMPLETED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE WORKMANSHIP PROVISIONS OF THE 2006 !BC. CONCRETE CONCRETE REQUIREMENTS: STRENGTH MAX W/C RATIO LOCATION C.1.P. LID VAULT WALLS :;ooorsI @ 28 DAYS o.53 FTGS & GRADE SLAB PLANK VOID FILL PLANK JOINT GROUT :;ooorsI @ 28 DAYS o.53 '.JOOOPSI @ 28 DAYS 0.55 TO MEET PLANK MFGR 1S REQUIREMENTS* TO MEET PLANK MFGR'S REQUIREMENTS* * STRENGTH MUST MEET OR EXCEED :;QQOPSI @ 28 DAYS AIR CONTENT: CONCRETE EXPOSED TO WEATHER SHALL CONTAIN 57-+/-17, ENTRAINED AIR. MIX DESIGN: SHALL BE BASED ON FIELD EXPERIENCE OR TRIAL MIXTURES IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS. MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS: CEMENT: ASTM C150. ADMIXTURES: AC! 301. AGGREGATES: ASTM C33. WATER: ASTM C94. PLACING REQUIREMENTS: PLACING: PLACE CONCRETE AS NEARLY AS PRACTlCABLE TO [TS FlNAL POSITION TO AVOID SEGREGATION. THE FREE UNCONFINED FALL OF THE CONCRETE SHALL NOT EXCEED 5 FEET. DEBRIS: REMOVE ALL DEBRIS FROM FORMS PRIOR TO PLAClNG CONCRETE, CONSOLIDATION: CONSOLIDATE CONCRETE BY SUITABLE MEAr,s. THOROUGHL '( WORK CONCRETE AROUND EMBEDDED ITEMS AND INTO CORNERS OF FORMS. CURING REQUIREMENTS: CURING: CONCRETE SHALL BE MAINTA!NED IN A MOIST CONDITION FOR A SUITABLE PERIOD OF TIME AFTER PLACEMENT. WEATHER CONDITIONS: ADEQUATE PRECAUTIDNS SHALL BE TAKEN DURING HOT AND COLD WEATHER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS LID PLANK PLACEMENT: IN NO CASE SHALL THE LID PLANKS BE PLACED BEFORE THE WALLS HAVE BEEN ALLOWED A MINIMUM OF 3 DAYS OF CURE. WHEN AVERAGE AMBIENT TEMPERATURES ARE LESS THAN 50 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT, THE CONTRACTOR MUST ALLOVv A ~1INIMUM CURE TIME OF 7 DAYS OR PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL SET OF CYLlNDERS TO BE BROKEN AT THE T[ME OF LID PLACEMENT DEMONSTRATING A MIN[MUM CONCRETE STRENGTH OF 1,000 PSI HAS BEEN REACHED. REINFORCING BAR MATERIAL REQUIREMENT: REINFORCING BARS: USE DEFORMED BARS CONFORMING TO ASTM A615, GRADE 60, EXCEPT AS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. WELDED WIRE FAllRIC: SMOOTH FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A185. FAllRICATION AND PLACING REQUIREMENTS: BENDING: BARS SHALL BE BENT COLD. BARS PARTIALLY EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE SHALL NOT BE FIELD BENT UNLESS NOTED OR SHOWN OTHERWISE OR AUTHORIZED BY THE ENGINEER. PLACING: REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE SUPPORTED AND TIED TO PREVENT DISPLACEMENT BY CONSTRUCTION LOADS OR BY PLACING OF CONCRETE. MAXIMUM SPACING OF SUPPORTS SHALL BE 3'·6 11 , CONCRETE COVER: MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER FOR REl~!F. SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE: CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH 311 CONCRETE CAST AGAINST FORMS AND EXPOSED TO EARTH 211 WELDING: DO NOT WELD REINFORCING BARS. WET SETTINGS: REINFORCEMENT ANCHOR BOLTS, OR ANY EMBEDDED ITEM WITHIN THE CONCRETE, MAY NOT BE SET INTO THE CONCRETE AFTER IT HAS BEEN POURED WITHIN THE FORMS. LAP SPLICES: PROVIDE LAP LENGTHS AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES CODE: VAULT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE 2006 !BC AS ADOPTED BY KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. GENERAL DETAILS: TYPICAL OR GENERAL NOTES AND DETAILS ON THESE SHEETS SHALL APPLY TO ALL CONSTRUCTION UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OR SHOWN OTHERWISE. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS NOT FULLY SHOWN OR NOTED SHALL BE SIMILAR TO DETAILS SHOWN FOR SIMILAR CONDIT!ONS. DISCREPANCIES: THE CONTRACTOR & SPECIAL INSPECTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE ENGINEER WITH A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION UPON FINDING ANY DISCREPANCY OR OMISSION IN THE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS. SHORING & EXCAVATION: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLEY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL EXCAVATION PROCEDURES, INCLUDING LAGGING, SHORING AND PROTECTION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY, STRUCTURES, STREETS AND UTILITIES. WALL BACKFILL: PRIOR TO BACKFILLING VAULT WALLS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE PLACED THE LID PLANKS AND PROVIDED A MINIMUM OF 5 DAYS OF CURE ON THE PLANK VOID FILL. BACKFILL SOIL: WALL BACKFILL SHALL BE WELL GRADED FREE DRAINING SOIL FREE OF ORGANIC MATERIAL. BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED IN LIFTS OF NO MORE THAN 8 INCHES AND COMPACTED TO WITHIN 90Y. OF THE SOILS MAXIMUM DRY DENS[TY. ALL COMPACTION OCCURING WITHIN 5' Of THE WALL SHALL BE COMPLETED USING HAND OPERATED MACHINERY. DESIGN CRITERIA VERTICAL LOADS ON VAULT LID: DESCRIPTION: UNIFORM LIVE LOAD TRUCK WHEEL LOADS SOIL COVER LIVE LOAD: 15DPSF * HS20·44 * VERTICAL LOADS ON OPEN MET AL GRATING: DEAD LOAD: NA NA 11·011 MINIMUM TO 21·5 11 MAXIMUM PEDESTRIAN LIVE LOAD 100PSF * NA * UNIFORM LIVE LOAD AND TRUCK LOAD NEED NOT BE APPLIED CONCURRENTLY. SEISMIC DESIGN: SEISMIC USE GROUP 11 111 le = 1.0 STRUCTURE LOCATION; ZIP CODE 98059 SITE CLASS = D DESIGN SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATIONS Sda = 0,964 Sd1 = 0.496 SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY = D BASIC SEISMIC FORCE RESISTING SYSTEM BEARlNG WALL SYSTEMS ORDINARY REINFORCED CONCRETE SHEAR WALLS RESPONSE MODIFICATION COEFFIClENT 11 R11 = 4.0 REDUNDANCE COEFFICIENT p = 1.0 SEISMIC HORIZONTAL l.OAD EFFECT: E = 1.0l1.2)0.964[W)/4.'~ = 0.289(WI = 408K FOUNDATION DESIGN: FOUNDATION DESIGN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING ASSUMED VALUES TYPICAL OF SOIL TYPES WITHIN THIS REGION. THESE VALUES ARE TO BE VERIF!ED i'>Y A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR TECHNICIAN AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION: ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE: 3,000 PSF LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES ON VAULT: AT REST CONDITION 50 PCF EFW (DRAINED LEVEL BACKFILL) ACTIVE CONDITION: ~5 PCF EFIV !DRAINED LEVEL BACKFILL) SEISMIC PRESSURE COMPONENT: E = 20H PSF UNIFORM PASSIVE SOIL RESISTANCE 250 PCF EFI'/ [F.5. , 1.5) COEFFICIENT OF BASE FRICTION: 0.~5 !F.S. , 1.5) SATURATED SOIL DENSITY: 125 PCF DEFERRED SUBMITTALS THE FOLLOWING AREAS OF WORK SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS "DEFERRED SUBM!TTALS 11 AS DEFINED IN THE 2006 !BC a. PRECAST PRESTRESSED HOLLOW CORE PLANK a. OPEN METAL GRATE ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS SHALL BEAR THE STAMP AND SIGNATURE OF A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER LICENSED TO PRACTICE IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON WHO HAS CURRENT DESIGN EXPERIENCE IN THE TYPE OF WORK REVIEWED. SUBMIT 4 COPIES OF ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR REVIEW. THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THEIR DESIGN DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THE ENGINEER DF RECORD, AND A RECORD SET OF THE REVIEWED DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. HOLLOW CORE PLANK SCOPE OF WORK: THE WORK INCLUDED lS THE DESIGN, MANUFACTURE AND DELIVERY OF PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE UNITS. DESIGN PLANK FOR THE MOST CRITICAL OF THE LOADING CONDITIONS AS SHOWN WITHIN THE DESIGN CRITERIA NOTE. THE MANUFACTURER SHALL SUBMIT STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND PLACEMENT DRAW[NGS SIGNED BY A WASHINGTON STATE REGISTERED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER FOR REVlEW PRIOR TO FABRICATION. THE MANUFACTURER SHALL INSTALL ALL BLOCK OUTS REQUIRED FOR STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS AS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS. NO OTHER PENETRATIONS ARE ALLOWED WITHOUT THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE PLANK MANUFACTURER. ALL HOLLOW CORE JOINTS SHALL BE GROUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. SECTION 11 TOWNSHIP 23 N RANGE 05 E W.M. OPEN METAL GRATING DESIGN RESPONSIBILITY: THE METAL GRAT[NG SUPPLIER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SELECTION AND DESIGN OF THE GRATING. THE SUPPLIER SHALL SUBMIT DESIGN CALCULATIONS, SHOP DRAWINGS, MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS AND ANY OTHER DOCUMENTATION NECESSARY TO SHOW THAT THE GRATING SELECTION MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. GENERAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS: LOADS: SEE DESIGN CRITERIA FOR LOADING REQUIREMENTS. FINISH: ALL GRATING SHALL BE GALVANIZED, UNO END BRG SEE GENERAL DETAILS ON THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. DESIGN OF BRG ANGLE OR EMBED SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE GRATING SUPPLIER. SPAN DIRECTION: SPAN DIRECTION SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THESE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS C.I.P. LID SECTION @ MANHOLE TO BE DESIGNED -~ BY PLANK MANUFACTURER. SEE PLANK MANUFACTURER'S PLACEMENT DWGS FOR ALL LID REINF @ MANHOLE OPNG. I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I i i I I I I I I I 1-------,-,--- ' ' I • • • • • • • I I I I I I i I I • I -<l) (!) ' eZ = -st-z .,.. 1LJ 0. 0 4B 51 11·611 " -- I I I I I I I I I I 611 -" " • • • • • • • 0------- [ [ " - 2 91 I ,,,,' I ' ADD #5 DIAG. AS SHOWN TYP WALL REINF ,/ ,, .. .. ,,' ,, /' ', ... >' I ,,' ..... ' ' , ';<', . ' "' ', BOT OF VAULT AS OCCURS / ,, ,, ',, J.------;s-- ' --· --1.--I __,.,.___. FOR EACH GROUP OF VERTICAL BARS CUT @ OPENING ADD ONE VERTICAL BAR FULL HEIGHT EA. SIDE OF OPENING. .-----• ' TYP WALL REINF @ PIPE PENETRATION SCALE N/A 2'·011 DIA OPNG ,,-+--ROUND LOCKING LID. SEE CIVIL DWGS FOR SPECIFICATIONS. \ C.I.P. SLAll SECTION \_ PERIMETER OR INTERIOR VAULT WALL . It MANHOLE. SEE PLANK MFGR PLANS FOR RE!NF. ©>------------ 4 TYP LID REINF @ MANHOLE w/o KNEE WALL S1 SCALE :,; 411 •1'-0 11 C.I.P. LID SECTION @ VENT PIPE -, PENETRATION TO BE DESIGNED BY \ PLANK MANUFACTURER. SEE PLANK \ MANUFACTURER'S PLACEMENT DWGS FOR ALL LID REINF @ VENT PIPE , PENETRATION. \ 91 i ,, ,, ,5 • 91 #5@12 11 0/c HORZ & VERT ON BACK FACE OF WALL. DOWELS TO FOOTINGS ARE NOT REQUIRED AT THESE VERT BARS 24 11 #5 X 30 11 \ TO MATCH WALL I HORZ. REINF \ · #5 x2 411x2 411 \ = CORNER BARS TO MATCH WALL HORZ REINF TYP ALT. HOOK TYP ~/ALL CORNER RE!NFORCING SCALE 3/4 11 •1'·0 11 FORM SAVER - #5x24 11 x24 11 AT EA FTG. LONG RE!NF BAR TYP PERIMETER I FOOTING REINF STEP FOOTING DETA!L .,-.,-. -~----,-,--= ~ -~---.. . ::,·:,;: ; ~ >ft·. Cl 1LJ Cl JU 0 • v /-FILL WITH GROUT AS DIRECTED BY / PRECAST PLANK MFGR. 6 S1 I I I I I o I I I I I I I l I I -r-----, .,--- ' I I I I I I ' I I I I ---T--J.--- 1 I I ---l--r.:-'1.--+7"·,L-----., I Id') LID REINF @ VENT PIPE SCALE '.:>/4 11 =1 1-0 11 ,?,L,Li--12" llELLGRATE AND FRAME AT ALL VENT PIPE LOCATIONS. OLYMPIC FOUNDRY PART NO. 12 T ~ G. SUBJECT TO CIVIL AND D.D.E.S. APPROVAL. -~~~~'~~...,.,.,..,-~-·.·.·,:-:-:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:··.·.·.·.·.:,:-:•:•:•Jlt:·:·:·:•:··.·.·.·.·-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-·.·. • , ,»-cs. , • .. "Ll ... . :::::::::::-. . .. · :< :<<p' . . . . ' . \_ CONT. BACKER ROD IF REQ'D. 1 TYP PLANK JOINT DETAIL S1 SCALE 111 =1'·0 11 [m @©f1UW~ (]) ,IAN t 7 2009 K.C. D.D.E.S. KING COUNTY D.D.E.S. APPROVAL FOR SITE CONSTRUCTION Review Engineer Date Senior Engineer Date Development Engintier Date I :c I- C a. I-z <C U'J <C LIJ ..J a. ; ::, :::. 0:: ; : t= ,.,,, : VJ! '" = w .:: ' I--·' ,,, I- ...I • <C > z 0 ...... I-z II.I I-w C a: w • ..... <C :II: ::IE a: 0 I-en SHEET: z 0 I- CJ z -:c ; ~ z :::, 8 CJ z 52 1 OF 3 S-08-072 I .. L~ ' ~ --"" IU > 10 11 I. 2>'·611 V V " er . CJ ' I 15 ,, ;y, ~ c;:; D D \ ' D -- 7 --V ar '-...-- 1 - ' J !D J D u lJ 0 . - J D J D D [ D 5 " S2> , r/ / . ' I 21·011 , I VAULT LID PLAN SCALE 1/8 11 = 11-0 11 GRATE COVER & SUPPORT ANGLE BY GRATE MFGR J n 0 , 10" THICK CURB REIN ,,., w/ #5@12 11 0/c HORZ & VERT. PROVIDE l2)·t5 CONT HORZ BARS @ THE TOP OF THE CURB. HATCHED 70NE ~ REPRESENTS 12·1/2 11 THICK CLOSURE POUR AT PERIMETER OP THE VAULT. EXTEND VERT ----------•••• REINf INTO '0 CLOSURE AS SHOWN. VAULT PERIMTER WALL ADD l7)·#7x16'·0" AT THE TOP OF THE WALL AT THE 14 1·011 LONG OPNG. CURB @ 51x14 1 GRATE SCALE 111 =1'·0" 77'·8" 19 PLANKS @ 4'·0" • 76'·0" = 0 -' 2 S:'1 6 s:; 671-6 11 , 1 ' S1, 70'·6 11 J ll I 1TOV•512.61 1--\ TYP THROUGH OUT VAULT, 2' 8' GRATE COVER & SUPPORT-\ ANGLE BY GRATE MFGR. \ gn THICK CURB REINF w/ t5@12 11 o/c HORZ. !. VERT. PROVIDE 12)-#5 CONT HORZ BARS@ THE TOP OF THE CURB. \ ;,,,_ #4 TIES @ 511 0/c. PLACE FIRST TIE NO MORE THAN 5' FROM FACE OF SUPPORT. 181·#6 TOP & BOT @ 2>611 BM\ ~'-0" 2 CURB & BEAM @ 51x14 1 GRATE 52 SCALE 111 =1'·0 11 SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 23 N, RANGE 05 E, W .M. I 1QII '· 5'-0" . ' 0 ' ' "" 2> - ' S2> ~ 11 l I ' = co = .,.. • r'-.,., 5 le IJ ~ :; /. S2 ~ 0 s:; 0 ..! -.,.. :;'-6" . 241 16' GRATE COVER !. SUPPORT, ANGLE BY GRATE MFGR. \ li: -"" JU > 0 ~ ' ch: \ 1 s:, 5 S:l 5 EXTEND VERTICAL WALL REINF INTO CLOSURE POUR. ~\ \ VAULT INTERIOR WALL __,.- 10 11 ! •••• -I' .. I c;; t I 71·011 5 4 ) ) 4 15 12 1-011 2 2 S2> ----·---------- ./. 77 1-8 11 76 1-0 11 71·0" F2>2x14 -----~ :;:.::_· ----------- 1 ~ IBOV=500.15 .J., TYP @ CELL 2 PERIMETER !IBOV•499.80 ~ ( = 0 ..! _..., DETENTION ONLY CELL JBOV•504.89 GJ' IBOV•504.89 I ~ --------------------------------------~-~--- f2>2x14 2 ( ~' -----"--'-' , 10" S1 = co 0 ..! -""' = "' = .,.. ' r;;: PLAN KEYNOTES 1. 411 THICK CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE REINF WITH 6x6·W2.9xW2.9 WWr. PLACE ALL REINr AT MID-DEPTH OF THE SLAB. CAST GRADE SLAB IN A SINGLE POUR. 2. C.I.P. CONCRETE WALLS AT THE PERIMETER !. INTERIOR OF THE VAULT. SEE WALL SECTIONS ON SHEET S2> FOR DIMENSIONS AND REINFORCING. PROVIDE ADDED REINF AT PIPE PENETRATIONS AS SHOWN IN 2/S1. PROVIDE REINF @ ALL WALL CORNERS AS SHOWN IN :l/S1. :l. THICKENED SLAB FOOTINGS TO BE GAST WITH THE GRADE SLAB. SEE SCHEDULE FOR REINF. 4, ACCESS HATCH ABOVE. 5. PIPE INLET OR OUTLET TO VAULT. SEE CIVIL DWGS FOR PIPE 6, 7. DIAMETER, LOCATION !. INVERT ELEVATION. SEE 2/S1 FOR WALL REINF II PENETRATION • 12·112 11 THICK PREGAST HOLLOW CORE PLANK. SEE DESIGN CRITERIA NOTES ON SHEET S1 FOR PLANK LOADING REQUIREMENTS. 24" DIAMETER OPENING TO ACCEPT RISERS, LADDE~ AND LOCKING MANHOLE COVER PER CIVIL DRAWINGS. T P 2 ACES. SEE 4/S1. 8. POUR SLOTS IN TOP OF PLANK. MANUFACTURER TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 2 SLOTS @ EACH END OF EACH PLANK. PLANK MANUFACTURER MAY REQUIRE GROUTING OF ADDITIONAL CELLS BEYOND THE MINIMUM OF 2. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE GROUTING OF THESE ADDITIONAL CELLS IN HIS BID. 9. PROVIDE BLOCKOUTS IN THE EDGE CELL OF THE PLANK PARALLEL TO THE PERIMETER VAULT WALLS. LOCATE BLOCKOUTS APPROXIMATELY AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. 10. 1211 • VENT PIPE. SEE 6/S1 FOR DETAIL INFORMATION. 811 4'·0 11 6'·6 11 6 s:; r-~1~0'~-6~11 --, . 811 11. 5'·0 11 x14'·0" OPENING TO RECEIVE REMOVABLE OPEN METAL GRATING COVER. METAL GRATING COVER TO HAVE INTEGRAL 24 11 SQUARE HINGED ACCESS OPENING LOCATED AS SHOWN ON THE VAULT LID PLAN. METAL GRATING SELECTION AND DESIGN IS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE GRATING SUPPLIER. SEE STRUCTURAL NOTES ON S1 FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. VAULT FOUNDATION PLAN 24 1 SCALE 1/8 11 = 1'·0 11 LEGEND 12. 10 1-0 11 WIDE x 5'·0 11 TALL OPNG WITHIN CENTER WALL. SEC: 7 !. 8/S2>. 12>, "FLO CONTROL" 411 , JPS SWING CHECK VALVE. TIE VALVE TO 4", FT DRAIN. CONSTRUCTION LOADS THE VAULT LID HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO CARRY THE "DESIGN LOADS" ONLY AFTER VAULT CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE, ALL DESIGN CONCRETE AND GROUT STRENGTHS HAVE BEEN ACHIEVED, AND ALL COVER HAS BEEN PLACED OVER THE VAULT • WITHIN THE LIMITS SPECIFIED ON THIS DRAWING. "BOBCAT" OR OTHER LIGHT EQUIPMENT SHALL BE USED fOR PLACEMENT OF MATERIALS OVER THE VAULT LID. ALTERNATIVELY, ALLOWABLE UNIFORM LOADS ON THE BARE SLAB CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE PLANK MANUFACTURER DIMENSIONS & ELEVATIONS THE CONTRACTOR AND HIS SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL DIMENSIONS AND ELcVATIONS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS WITH THE CURRENT PERMITTED SET Of CIVIL DRAWINGS, AND SHALL NOTIFY BOTH THE CIVIL !. STURCTURAL ENGINEERS IN WRITING OF ALL DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE CIVIL DWGS AND THESE DWGS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. -'1.-----f---. . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • rn m rn • • • • • • • • • IBOV !TOY ,~.---,-, ==,»--c,-___ ,,, ( ' ' e ~ • • • • • • • m • • • • • • • 811 THICK CUR REINF w/ #5@12 11 0/c RZ !. VERT. PROVIDE 12)·#5 CONT HORZ B S II THE TOP OF E CURB. HATCHED ZON REPRESENTS 1 -11211 THICK CLOSUR POUR. = co 0 ' "" D ----t----------1-------;----------:-----• • • • .- • • • • "' I'.!> .. z ~ z -t-IU cs l'.L 0 4B S2 • • INSIDE BOTTOM OF VAULT !TOP OF GRADE SLAB) INSIDE TOP OF VAULT LID [TOP OF CONCRETE WALLS) CIP CONCRETE WALL CONCRETE SPREAD FOOTING 14. 48 11 DIAMETcR TYPE 2 CATCH BASIN BASE. SEE: 4/92. PLACE SUMP INLINE w/ OUTLET PIPE AS SHOWN IN THE CIVIL DWGS. 15. 6"• DRAIN PIPE PENETRATION INTO VAULT. LOCATE PIPE BETWEEN TYP WALL HORZ !. VERT REINF. NO ADDITIONAL REINF IS REQD AROUND THE PENETRATION. CIP CONCRETE EDGE POUR OR ACCESS HATCH INFILL CONCRETE CURB EXTENDING ABOVE THE TOP OF THE PLANK DIRECTION OF DOWNWARD SLOPE 16. 2411 DIAMETER OPENING TO ACCEPT RISERS, LADDER, RING AND LOCKING MANHOLE COVER PER CIVIL DRAWINGS. TYP 1 PLACES. SEE 4/S2. FOOTING SCHEDULE GRATING SPAN DIRECTION FOOTING STEP LOCATION SEE 5/S1 SWING CHECK VALVE DIRECTION OF FLOW· ~ 14)-#6 PLANK DOWELS PLACED AT MIDDEPTH OF SLAB. ~ 12-1/2 11 THICK CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE SLAB SHOWN SHADED. ···· 112>1·#5 T!.B AS SHOWN. D 411 (!11+") 811 THICK WALL . REINF w/ t5@12"o/c HORZ & VERT. PROVIDE 121·#5 CONT HORZ BARS @ THE TOP OF THE WALL. = 0 ..! "" '· -r MARK SIZE REINFORCING f:l2x14 :;2 11 WIDE x 1411 THICK (:;J-#5 B. LONG. fr4@12 11 o/c B. TRANS. F46x14 46 11 WIDE x 14 11 THICK 14)·#5 B. LONG. #4@12 11 0/c B. TRANS. NOTE: ALL FOOTINGS ARE CENTERED ON THE WALL ABOVE, UNLESS DIMENSIONED OTHERWISE IN THE WALL SECTIONS 21·0" DIA OPNG \ '--G.I.P. SLAB SECTION II MANHOLE. SEE 4A/S2 ,-#5 DOWEL TO MATCH VERT WALL REINF SPACING. · CAST fTG & GRADE SLAB AGAINST I PRECAST BASE. ....------------.. ( 1 ' ' L ______ -- ~-ROUND S LID LOCKING ID PERIMETE VIALL OF VAULT SEE \VALL SEC IONS ON SHEET s:;, '. -·.· ;-·. ~- · <· i----..c4:c-8._.11 t.__ _ __.-f ' . = 0 -' .,., .. , . :' ·\ 48" TYPE 2 CATCH --t.,., . BASIN BASE .· s ,-, KING COUNTY 0.0.E.S. APPROVAL FOR SITE CONSTRUCTION 0-------©-------Review Engineer Date CURB @ 51x14 1 GRATE L!D & K~~EE WALL RE!NF @ MANHOLE S,enior Engineer Dote 52 SCALE 111 =1'·0 11 SCA E NI~ DeveJopment Engineer Dote I Iii 00 00 q Q ... ' l2 Q ---' 1:1 • -N -- V, C ~ IJ.I • 0 . c,: . . • :) ~ F" ,. u :c ::i ::; • ~~ : I-~ : V'l <) C .w.~ • F"; ' '" -c .: ',;."\ -;:( "" I- ...I :::::, er: > ::c z 0 I-..... er: I- CL z I-II.I I-z UJ er: C "' er: a: II.I II.I ...I • r- CL er: ;c :E a: 0 I- "' ~ ' ... i.ll ' I tJ i ~ § g fl! "' " uj Z I ; ~ [lj <~· ~~~ ~ re !!i ~ :c ~ .. z s z -::c ; ~ :::, 8 C, z S2 SHEET: 2oF 3 S-08-072 I • I I • ' I • I ' - ' __, .i ~--,C"',4: 0 .., - 06,----.. -"', 10' ';15ig ~ -,=<-• . --.--.-------------. ""~. ~r~ 7'.-!!•:~-CCCC.·~-·::: C 112 -·.·c-;-=c,;CO' . --.-·.··=o~. :::::;~~:::c; :- c,cc---------· 'mr~" ; "-''~'"' c" ·--·= ·--·--·--=··"" ' -------. ----------. ·--------------, .· ·-·-·--·-.. -.-.--.-. =:::::· :c::c:_~'- 103 102 07 211 (•1/-1 11\ CLR. \-0 11 ) 101 .... ·.·.· .. -.--.--.-.--.--....... -.. -.. -.-, . ....... ------" ... -.-. _, __ , •................... " . . .... . 1 TYP WALL SECTION s:, SCALE 1/2 11 =1'-0 11 2 s:, 21-0 11 MIN @ VOIDS w/ POUR SLOTS 211 (' + 11 -111\ CLR. \011 ) 213 210 TYP WALL SECTION SCALE 1/2 11 =1 1-0 11 102 207 s:, SECTION 11 TOWNSHIP 23 N RANGE 05 E W .M. 110 109 108 211 (+1141 1\ CLR. \·0 11 ) 213 101 TYP SECTION @ 51x14 1 OPNG SCALE 1/2 11 -1 1-0 11 102 411 (t114") 105 112 4 WALL SECTION @ STEP SCALE 1/2 11 =1'-0 11 = _,.,. 0 .,J... 210 5 s:, 206 105 207 1-1/2 11 1, 11-111\ CLR. l\·0 11 ) 103 TYP WALL SECTION SCALE 1/2 11 =1'-0 11 WALL SECTION GENERAL KEYNOTES 101. PROVIDE A BENTONITE CLAY OR HYDROPHILIC WATERSTOP IVOLCLA'T' 1'WATERSTOP·RX 11 OR 11 AKWASTOP"I AT ALL PERIMETER WALLS OF THE VAULT. INSTALL WATERSTOP IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. 102. 12·1/2 11 THICK PRECAST PRESTRESSED HOLLOW CORE PLANK. 10:;. '0' I -,, 105. FINISHED GRADE. ELEVATION VARIES. SEE DESIGN CRITERIA ON SHEET S1 FOR APPROXIMATE SOIL DEPTHS OVER THE VAULT LID IN ADDITION TO THE CIVIL OWGS FOR FINAL GRADE ELEVATIONS. 611 , PERFORATED PVC FOOTING DRAIN ViRAPPED IN 12 11 x12 11 MINIMUM DRAIN ROCK BEDDING I,. FILTER FABRIC. ROUTE DRAIN TO DISCHARGE POINT AS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL DWGS. ~ ! ~-111 ~ ,·----·-.'..---J~-~~ -,, // "' --= = = = ~ ---..,;_ -~ i_~ 1 = __.L_ -• ---~ ''~ti' -~·~~}------~-a . ~004 ,--,1---------J..1-1.. •. ~---· ---.... --------------·.. .. --.:::. --'-t---·------0:... Ill, · 1 , SEE HEAD~ ELEVATIO 7/S~'< APPL'!' PREFABRICATED DRAINAGE PANEL IMIRADRAIN 6000 OR EQUIVALENT! TO ALL PERIMETER VAULT WALLS. EXTEND DRAINAGE PANEL OVER THE FULL HEIGHT Of THE WALL. A 12 11 THICK LAYER OF FREE-DRAINING GRANULAR FILL MA'!' BE USED IN LIEU OF THE DRAINAGE PANEL. a, .., .... -'!<- ---------........ ,... ... ----· ·--· ------· ---~ _.,"!' .. "--------· I I I ; · '~• I · ~ ____ _.. ____ y,-;t"-----.------· 2l ---· ---· ------· -· • ----·1,1-+---------• . · ---------,,t!f.'. -" --·-<:i-• -· -------14---·· ----{~--~F•"~~----~---,......,_ ~I · ,>::rl'i ~,05 ·. ~. J'(~:',,,_ ~.·. 4.,.. 11,,., ""·11 II,, ,-. . . A_,1: ! : ·, :}11 SPACES @ 6110/c FOR 10 1-0 11 OPN 31"-! : , \,:,, . ~ !~1-~ 10 1-0 11 ~ I ! i . 1,061' I , ··-· -----: : ,o6l --•• ••~LI~ : I <J • </ 1.-1 I I I I 1 1· I I ·. r,o, i I i i ' ~ ! ,03 • ~ I I I 4...ll ., </ ,,-..,,,~ 1f1r •: /,~. f,nfi ,_.-, Ill :1 ; ,·~06 ~ ',, ":,' I : : I J / ... :1.-,· /l --.._ ,111 w, ~</ . • ',, ~ .: ::i, ,/ . . . -L~~~~~~~~~~~~ .. , •• 1t:'-------------------------. ___ LL __ --------_c _____________ .. 7.1:tr~~v-~~~=-=-~~-' . . 1, ', <J . ·. · . . ./ ,l I I . · . : ' "L\ 1:.,,... •,. <l . ·,d . //·1,11· . -------, _____ j 4-->~~-. ____ · ,1 __________ _Ll ______ . -----" .. -------. _· . ------'' :L":..~:/ -+4i!------------- . ll'.7• ' · . . .£...I '' 111 • .. 1:: ..... <J.· .... .1_ //,. -111.' I I I • ', · . <J ./ · L..L I '<1' A . . · I I ~ I I 1 1 1 ' . . REINFORCING KEYNOTES :;01. 15)-#711 HORZ HEADER RE!NF SPACED AS SHOWN. EXTEND 24 11 MIN BEYOND EDGE OF OPNG BELOW. :;02. 12)-#5 CONT @ TOP OF WALL. :;o:;. PROVIDE l:;)-#5 VERT EACH JAMB OF OPENING. :;Q4. T'T'P WALL HORZ REINF. :}05. #5 VERT J-BARS II 611 0/c. :}06. 12)-#5 x 41-0 11 DIAGONAL BARS EACH CORNER. FOR REINF. 8" HEADER SECTION SCALE 1/2 11 =1'-0 11 106. PLANK TO BEAR :,11 MINIMUM ONTO THE TOP OF THE CONCRETE WALL. SEE PLANK MANUFACTURER'S DRAWINGS FOR FINAL BEARING LENGTH. INSTALL NEOPRENE BEARING PAD AS DETAILED ON THE PRECAST PLANK PLACEMENT DRAWINGS. 107. 611 t PVC PRESSURE RELIEF SLEEVE SET :,n CLEAR FROM TOP OF WALL. PROVIDE 121 SLEEVES @ 25 1-4 11 0/c ALONG THE LENGTH OF ALL INTERIOR WALLS. 108. CIP CONCRETE BEAM. SEE :;/S2 FOR REINFORCING. 109. SEE DETAILS 2, :,, & 4/S2 FOR CURB REINFORCING AND THICKNESS AT THE REMOVABLE OPEN METAL GRATING. 110. DESIGN BUILD OPEN METAL GRATING w/ 24'' HINGED SQ ACCESS PANEL. SEE SHEET S1 FOR LOADING CRITERIA I,. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS. 111. 11FLO CONTROL" 411 f !PS SWING CHECK VALVE. PART NO. 1520-40. GROUT INTO sn, THRU 1VALL SLEEVE. TIE VALVE TO 411, PERF PIPE @ THE PERIMETER OF THE VAULT. BACKWATER VALVES ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. 112. 411 f PERFORATED PVC FOOTING DRAIN WRAPPED IN 12 11 x12 11 MINIMUM DRAIN ROCK BEDDING I,. FILTER FABRIC. TIE DRAIN TO 4 11 f !PS SWING CHECK VALVE. 6 - 21-0 11 MIN @ VOIDS w/ POUR SLOTS 1-1/2 11 (+114 11\ CLR. \·0 11 ) 210 105 TYP WALL SECTION SCALE 1/2 11 =1 1-0 11 WALL SECTION REINFORCING KEYNOTES 201. 811 THICK CONCRETE WALL. REINF w/ #5@12 11 0/c HORZ t,, VERT. PLACE VERT REINF NEAR THE INSIDE FACE OF THE WALL. LAP ALL HORZ BARS 24 11 MIN @ SPLICE LOCATIONS. PROVIDE 12)-#5 CONT HORZ BARS @ THE TOP OF THE WALL. 202. 811 THICK CONCRETE WALL TYPICAL @ THE INTERIOR OF THE VAULT. REINF w/ #5@12 11 0/c HORZ & VERT. PLACE VERT REINF @ THE CENTER OF THE WALL. LAP ALL HORZ BARS 24 11 MIN @ SPLICE LOCATIONS. PROVIDE 12)·#5 CONT HORZ BARS @ THE TOP OF THE WALL. 20:;. f5 FOOTING TO WALL DOWELS TO MATCH WALL VERTICAL REINFORCING SPACING. PROVIDE STD HOOK @ END OF BAR CAST INTO FOOTING. PLACE ALL DOWELS @ THE CENTER OF THE WALL. DOWELS SHALL BE EMBEDDED A MINIMUM OF 11 11 +/-1/2 11 INTO THE FOOTING I,. SHALL EXTEND INTO THE WALL :,0 11 MIN. 204. #6 FOOTING TO WALL DOWELS TO MATCH WALL VERTICAL REINFORCI~JG SPACING. PROVIDE STD HOOK @ END OF BAR CAST INTO FOOTING. PLACE ALL DOWELS @ THE CENTER OF THE WALL. DOWELS SHALL BE EMBEDDED A MINIMUM OF 11 11 +/-1/2 11 INTO THE FOOTING I,. SHALL EXTEND INTO THE WALL :;0 11 MIN. 205. #5x 24 " @ 24 11 0/c l#5x4'·0 11 @ INTERIOR BRG WALLI PLACED SUCH THAT EACH 48 11 WIDE PLANK RECEIVES 121 BARS. LOCATE BARS IN VOIDS WITH POUR SLOTS AS SHOWN ON THE PRECAST PLANK PLACEMENT DWGS. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL BARS @ EACH PLANK If REQ'D AND SHOWN ON THE PRECAST PLANK SHOP DWGS. 206. #5 HAIRPIN w/ 14'1 WIDTH & 18 11 LONG TAILS @ EACH VOID KNOCKOUT. 207. #5 CONT WITHIN EDGE VOID OF PLANK. 208. #5 x 21-6 11 @ 24 11 0/c. BAR TO EXTEND 10-112" ABOVE TOP OF WALL. PLACE BAR @ THE CENTER OF THE WALL. 209. #7 x 21-6 11 @ 24 110/c. BAR TO EXTEND 10-1/2 11 ABOVE TOP OF WALL. PLACE BAR @ THE CENTER OF THE WALL. 210. l:;l-#6 CONT IN CLOSURE POUR . 211. l2f-#5 CONT. 212. #5 x24 11 x24'' @12110/c. 21:,. 1011 THICK CONCRETE WALL. REINF w/ #5@12 11 0/c HORZ & #7@12 11 0/c VERT. PLACE VERT REINF @ THE INSIDE FACE OF THE WALL. LAP ALL HORZ BARS 24 11 MIN @ SPLICE LOCATIONS. PROVIDE 121-#5 CONT HORZ BARS II THE TOP OF THE WALL. 214. ADD l71·#7x16'-0 11 AT THE TOP OF THE WALL AT THE 14'-011 LONG OPNG. SEE 2/S2. KING COUNTY D.D.E.S. APPROVAL FOR SITE CONSTRUCTION Review Enginee.-Dote Senior Engineer Doto Development Engineer Dato u, z I-e ..I ::, C, z <C -::c > ; :c z 0 I-""""' <C I- 0. z I-LI.I I-z l.i.i <C C U'J <C a: LI.I LI.I • ...i .... 0. <C ~ == z :I ::, 8 C: 0 C, I-z -UJ ::w:: SHEET: OF 3 S-08-072 -- I I ' ., ·, I \ ' . \ ' ', ' \ ' I '· \ \ \ \ \ ', ,, ', ' ( --.,'- --,.-~. ---- ) i / J \ ----·----, __ ' / \ ' / \ \ [ ' I 1 ' ' ' j ' ', ' \ ' ' \ \ '· ' \ i ,, ' -- ! ' ' ' \ - ' - < ---,. ' \ ', ~- ./ L, ,/ f \ \ . \ ' I ' I / ·-,, ', \ i ' ' ' / ' \ ,. • .:c.. ______ ..JI.· .J ---- . / ·' ',' \ . ' \\ ' . \ ___ _;_ __ --'• ---- -- !---/ ) --_,,./ ' i - ' ' / \ \ \ ' \ \ '·-r, .. , ---' 1_.,.-..... ' ' ' '<l[ ', .. _ '· . . \., I I ' i I mri,, •eo. ·- . -,:- \ . ', \, ' ' \ ' ' • • , ' \ { ,.., -. __ \ ·---- \ . ·-"<-;-··· \ \ \ -, "1_ \ ' ' ', ', ·---.-, ' \_ ' \ \ . ' ' ! ·, ' \ ' \ . i ' ! ' i I \ ' ,---. \ // i I ;,,----'-/--,!._ "\ \ '\:·c,-.)----~\--"\\·--•'-'-'··~ .... ,--1 "'· ~< ,__ ii ·-' \ \ ' ' ' \ \ '· \ \ ' \ ' ' \ \ ' ·-'\ \ ·,_ ', •, \ ... -~--\~,__.,);-----'(\ :::--··:.c. ' \, ' ·, ·-.. ", ',,_ ' ' \ \ \, ' ' \ ' ' \ ·, \ \., . / ' ' ' \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ ' \. \ \ \ -'-'-I·- ~\ ( \ \ \ t~··,,----+--·----,, I • \ \ \ \_ ' ' ' \ \_, \ \ " \ ·. \_ \ '\ \ l . ' .. ·' l ; / ' l ' ' ·, \ \ ' i i \ ' . \ \ \ \ ' ' '· \ ·, \ ' I \ ' ·-', \ \ \ \ \._ '--. ,, \ I ·--, \. \ ·--·- \ \ \ ) ' ' / / ! -~- ,,·. __ ,i J I } f i / i • r ( \ ' I \ \ ' ,· I -, / ··-' / i ------ ' " ' . i j ' ' ) J ' ' (.-··' -----.. -· ,._ \ / (,.~_ ·,-------·-)>--- I .. ------- ·--·-" ," I ! ---- I _/ 1, ' ,. ) / ) ' ' --. - \ ) , __ \ . ;:,;,- \ ··----~-...;.;.._...l. __ ., ___ ....;.',-··-" ") / ', "'1 \ -'"~- ! ----.. I I \ ) ' ( l \ / . \ ' ~- . ·------------,.,--__....._-- ' I ' ·' ·, ' / "-, ' ' / ( ' i .. -, ' ' ,-·------•. -j \ S<r•·', •, \ ' ' ) <$HAM~ ~ LOT 118 ' ' ' z ') { J / I 1 ' ' i ' ' '· ~- ' ·, ; _,--, --~ (._ ' ' '. / \ ! { ' ·- \ ' -- / ·' \ \ ------"\ ', _,./ \ ··c_ I ' ' ~ ... \ I ' ,, \ \ -- --, .. -· \ ---') ' ,_ \ \ ) . ! ' ' ' ' ' ··~. ·, / -· ,, -· ' ' ,, ' / \ ' ' / _/ \ . ··---·-' - -:--- ... ,.J' \ -~ ..... _, / J ' ' ' ' ·,. ' ' ' \ ' i J ----,r-~~- • l / i, \ \,. ' \ \ \ t_ '· ",---'-"'"" ) \ \ \ \. \ ) I \ ·, ' \ 1 \ ' \ i ·, \ ,, l i I 1 ' . -- ' ---- \ ', l \ \ \ ' I \ \ / .( i -...... ,, \ ' . \ ,. __ ) \ " ' \ \ '·, ·-~ \,, \ } . '--·-·· ---~ -, ~-... ' \ ,.,, i -..._ ' ·. ' '• .. '-t \ 'k'"-':--\--'--.!,...---~,------~ ·-..,I ) \ \ \l,lii) i I \ ! 1 i /',}-' f--J-.:-, .L\ / '· . ·, . ,-~----···-~· ' \ \, \\, ' ----~-·x., ~---\-.-- j \, -- ·-/ ' I ) \ \ ' ' ) ( I { \\.\\"\ \\\,\\ / r(c1_·· --,1~-; _1,;_,_ ... _,·~/_··_'-'-~.~-/--·~"· ·~·,. __ -_\,. ---·-··· ,.J \'III,'\\.,\ / \ \ .\ t ', \ '~ \ . •, . \. ·,. ~. --._ -., ·-·~---"c --, •• ---. __ ',, ,, ---~,-' ' ', \ ' 3 -, ', ,, /\ l '• • \ i·- _} ) \ f ( / \ ! ' \ (_)!/' I [ \ \ \ . i I ' -\ \ ' ·-..... ' ', ,) I . ' .. I 1-- \ ! ' •• -·--, ... \ \ ' i . -, / ' ---... ' i ' J I I ' "j ; ' ·'-- \ \ ' ' ' ' • \ ' ' ' I \ \ \ ' \ l ' ' _/ ' ' i . ; \ ' / I l + •. l ' ' ) ' \ l ', \ ,, . / ·-,_ f \ ___ / / l ,,, . ,, ! , ' I 'JP) \ ~· ..... ,· i .. / i ' ; -1 ) L_ ·, '', i ) ..f -·'--, i ' ! ' { ' ( '·-, \ [ \ \ ·::i1_ ,_; \ ' ' ,._.-· ' _t -· --' / ' L ' "; ',_ j i ! :~~ ', ' ' ' \ '· \ -~ ... , ------. -,,_, _/ -. ' \ ·-------- \ -.,. \ .,, i _/ / // /' i // ___ \ i ', ( I \ ' \ \_ \ \ _.) r ) t __ ... -- [ ·, "-r / \ \ \ \ ! .: l ! I / ! . I , \ ' . ' \_ ··-..__ ! \ . ···-~--···-~-·-·. ' ~ "'>S,• .,-,,,, • .,..,,,. •• "" • ., .. , . .,. ---- \ "·- / , __ _ I ,/ -- \ I -\ \,_ \ ' t ' \ ) I / \ ··-, \ \ \ ·,, ' \ \ \ l \...-\ /, { , ' I, ' ' '· \ \ ,-- \. I \ \ ·-.\. . --·--, ······---- '' ,' ( I ', -., ,-,_, ; .-/ \ ' ! i - / ·------\__,/ j '-.. ,' \ ! \ / ' I .. -,J •-.. ---~-~- \ ·, / / "\ ____ ...-· ······-·-·· f ·-.\. / I ,/ \ ' ·'"1 ) /-- ' { \ ( -./ -, [; -·\ .. ' ' ' / ·1 -. ···--·" . ., ., / --. ,· / ,~ -• i ( .J-.• -,.·- __ .. -·---. ------ , ! \ 't / ·--. ,,. \ \ ,) f ,.' , ' t '-·-j i " · .. ',. --. \ -, [ _,.. . _,,.-{ _i ·-.J .•-.. j } ;, { ' ' / I _,.,' /" '·· ·-, "S.\ ' _I ,· ,· ' \_. ' ,. ( .~ / ,' _,,- ,' • ........ - / / ---"> I \_ '·. -~c•' -, .•' /,/ /] ' . ) (·--- --./ ' •-. 1 _) ' { ' '· " . ' i ,, _.le.-:;'····· ( ··-'--~----·' / ( _/ : ) \ ! / j ·----- !· ,,,-··.-<·~.j ) . PRIVATERGAD '·----~- / ', ... ....--''· ·,_ ... -.------~---· .~--· .----·-.... ----.... ----.---·-' ---- ,._ / ~,_ \ ... ' /' ,_ ····-. / _.~-- i ___ ) ' ' I -. '. \ ,,,-'""'/ J .. ---· ----- \\ "-~, \_./ ) < \ ' ...~. \ ,' ... I ·-.,•• , 1 .. ' -..- ,/ ' ' ,!; / 1/, l /' I. l I / --... ~ ..... / ... _. ____ ., .. I I 1 . , ' \, .,.__. /, •, ; ' , I J ( ' \. \ " I ,' V ) ···: I ) { / ,, ( I / \ ) --'-- I 1 ,. J I J - / ' l ' / . / .,·., . ./ I I } ( (/ I__--. / ,r· I \ / '/. I -' ' '< , .. ,,.. / .. ,, ., .. /' / Z'',,i ' ' ... \ l- ·-~,. \ ... _,' ----.. ' \ ' ·, ' / / ', \ "'', / ( . -:,.., / j l. . I , I. / / ' ' ,,. ' / ' --. ' Y. -;---· _,,--· \._ ; I \ -,,, . ' I / / / " ' , ___ _ ,' ,-. -· ·, I j "\. 1 _/ J i ! ) I ( ) ·-., ' \ / L __ .. " __ _ ' ' ' i ,_ ~--· ,,·, ' ', ·, ) \ ----) \. i ! ' ., (~ ' ' . ' ' _/-.......... , '\ . . .........__ ···-. ' \ , .. ' -_ .. ' ' l ;-, " ----·-, / •,/ ; ,, ' ' j 1 ' ' I j_ ___ j_,. ', ' "• // ,· ,--.· .. - ,-' / / ,' ----. i I \ \ ). •• >"·' ····----····--··--, __ .... - ·-·····-·· ----._ ,· \ ' ,. -•·-, ~----~=---- ( . ' -·• .. - \ \, ! \ ' ' ' . " \ ' \ '·. ' / (~-~- ! \ / ' , TR4CT A ' \ . ' \,:·, . .. --- I I \ ' \ I \ ' -~-, ' ' . ,. -- ""'! ( I __ ··,, -· ' -, i i ' ', / I I I \ .,/ .. ., ... _ ) ( '",., --· . .., I. --~. ; \ \ 's. [ ,.) ) ,- ) l ' J ' .~---"- __ .. -·· [ ' \ \ I ! ·'t )\ .-,, ,.,- ' \ ---- . ,' \ I \ ' I -·· \ ! ' I ,..,•' ' _,.- ' ' I · .. -... , ~-. ~--"-'. ( \ i -. -. {l _ I l ' ' ' r ' ·._ "') '._ . "\ ·, . ' ' .: 1 _( \ --.. .-.· ' ' _. \ \ ', ,I ', ,, ' \ ' ', ' ' ' _)____ .> ---... _,.._ . ·--, / .-. ..- / ,,.- ( ; I ,, ..... /""\.·· f·-' i_..1 1 •C ' ---· l l ' i ) i I ' ,_ - > ', ( ; ; ! I I I I ' ' • i ' ! ) \ ,, i ' •-.. -- 'fR'" -, D-_., •",J.,I..,., ,· ' ILc1 --.-·· --.. , i .. ' .-', ,.· .-~- / ( ,..-.· I I '·, / / -, __ - ..-, / '·'[ \ ~ ·, : . \ ' " ·, . ·, \ ,, ... -. I .; ' . ,, I .-/ ; ) / .-,' ' ' I \ '! ' I -' ' ' ' ( ; ' / ' \ ' I . -----·-. --- \ \ ' ·~ .. -, \, ' \ ' \ ,! " / '' -...... --' / ,_ -·----·' , ·a- I ·' / < .. ,.r>·-··' I .. , ·, ----· __ .. , ·,/ .. '., <: l\'' ',, I ) ,· 1: --··· ··-, ! ,/ / -{ ' . ' / l l " -,,) (~ i a I_ .,.:··-/ . ~ { ,, \ ' "··--·-- . _,.,... ---~ ' I i ·, 1 \_ /. ' i ' .. , ~ ... ,. ·-·-· f--•w---, ./ -.. /_,, ' . j / \ ! ( ·-._ ... / ;_·-~_.,...- /f ;, ' .---· I '-··· - ' -- I / l ) / ,:. ,:: __ ---· ./ tf : ---4- ' ' ·, __ / rto -, 1,00' ' l ; ) .i ..---~- ·-/ ----~ .-•. -.... -.--.··-"'-,--,-.. ------ --.. --·-·----· / ( ---- /-. -··---·--j-' c:-- ;-, ··--._/ A-····-·· / I / I ,,-'si / ' ' ' ' ·-:> / / .,./' ' . ··-,_ / I ,, / --.. ]_ .. -, __ ' , __ \ (;:.,,,·:~:~_;· i "· . \~ - ' " __ _f \_. -· f ,.> ' ' ' I '··--/ l ·-! 11 I .' /" .. i ' '·-·,..-· · .. f / 1 '· ' ··!.-· ••• ,--., \ ! \ ·1_ _) / _, ( ) . ' I i ,/ ·'•. \ ', ; I ' { ! r ' ' . , ...... . ' ' .. ~~--.... ./ \ -,._ j, ', \ \,,_ -· I I ,,J~ , J:' i I,.~· I·.,.,- ' ' ' ' ·) -, • ;"-t-·~-,,. :l' .b.1>. ' ' .;_: I ' ', / .,~·-~ ' ' ,., . / ' ./ / ·-----~ .. / ' .. · ,. ·i l ' l .. ----- .-· -, / \ / ·-.. -... ,-, \ I _ .. , ./ ·- / ... .~- '··-; ' --··· ----/ ( / i / 1. \ -~-- \_ _ .. -. ! ./ ', / _ ... --· / . __ _,, ( ' ' ' ( -----,· __ ,,-, . j «' \ ·-- '' . ' i / I / '- I / I i -.,. ' --.. ---- / \ '-... __ ,- -<. I ) ·1 ' ! ',' • • ' I I I _·,\ !" -... -- ,' / ._/-· . ·~----,..,~.,,:..-~ . 'l ··-·-· -.·)----,l----....... ----.,.,,._, --, I I ' -, ' I -. ·_; ·-~ ' \. ' 14~·-·· ' { ; -~ _ _., ' • J I .... --/, .. / l ----- 'c , .. ' ., ------,'-,_, --Cb., - ' ' -.. -,· ' ---· I / / / ' / , ____ ,, __ _ / ' ' -. f · t:~'.~3~:_:-~;:-----,,,. ! . ' / i ' '' . ) ' ' / 'I ·-·· . -._ ·-=---,-c,-~-=-,-,.--..,~ -~-. .. -{ _,' ,/ Ir· --'---.--.--+\-+---• ·""';--!4i--"'--\ \ I r--· f-',-----'~·-'-/"'., c;··c,,,,i· b-'-. .-' , _________ .._._ ____ ,_,, __ "="'"' ! I . ( ' ' . ' ' \ I ; .......... ' ' \ !c. ·-.. --, • .. , ··' ' i ' . i , ·'t / l ,,.,,.,------~-- { \ ·, . ' ' '· '' -----;-I .. : .. L,_. ! i ' ' . _i '.'! ' I ' I •, r. ,' '; \ ·• I l ! . ' I ·\' · .. "''•' ' ·~ { ._-,--·. -' ! ,, / ' r ~~-____ . } ; ' ' I ! / l ,' / ( , ' [ / ' '· I ,,/ /1 J \ ' . , ' I / _., .. ····"-.,-. ! ' ' ! ·--··L \ .. J ,. 1 ' .. - ; , I $~ ' ' ) \ ', '····-- '·-·-·--·/ ' ' ' " {I, • ' ' ' ' I I I ,/ ' ! ' ' .. ,--- \/ ,, ', ' ;,- -\,. ' ' ~ 1 . zo' " f ,, ' i, __ .> r / ' ~"-----~+--~., l i ' \ l ' ' t>--- jc_,; IS \' .:,--.. -· I ) ' ! I i ,-·---·-I ____ ,,_,,._ ___ .. / ·' _,/ . ·• -- / ' ' -,------.. ··-··.--""-" -l ---/ / ·\ / ' ' ,, ',. ·-· .. . . -,._, .. \_. .. -·· -. __ .. -· ·----'-·--.. /-- ' ' ' ,. \ ' \ ·,..,_ ' \ ' ··,-:.. ' ' \ ) \ 'l"r--=·· =i"" ,·,··~--r'-'--.! •• ---",,.,;----,_ ... ·",-~-'--'. 7' i i i ' ' \ I /Al / / / / <0-,-' ' J ________ ... - ' ' I "'/-T -·-- --.. ) ' \ ' ,/ . / I r . \,,r·---·_;;_ ___ ,, ___ ,f---./ \ ' ' ---/ j .-·· , _____ _ ' ·-,_ '. \ / _.,~'" ' ) ... ·/ .. , , ! ' \ \ . ' '·.,, __ _ ·--- \" •. '· . \ ·---.. _ .. -----r-- \ --( •"" ' ,. , /,- • -,-._·ac"~ ~-1: ~n . r... ,_ .• -. • ,e' ' ) ----1 ' ,.----.. ·.,_ ) ' • • ' ' -,. , ,/ '} ' ' I i ... -. ) _. ) -----~ ··--- .-' \ j ··" j _ ... _ .. -. . --. ., ' ·--. -- .' / , ) ', __ ,- ( --.. " ....... , , ---------- . ,---- ,. li / -. .,, .. -·~--- --·; i ,; \ .• j _;;-\ _ _.,.. ) ' ) : __ , ----~·-·''\ _,-- \ / I ./ / ,. ', ·-----... ' · .. , ' ' --·-- .~.-- \ .. ·-·~/-•''-~-' ! ' ' ) r ) ' ' ' ' l '·---··, _ .. -..,.... __ _ ,, _.c--- -,_ •" '-•-~r , '· ' l •, ) --·' \ ' ""'· ., " .... --·, _-_ ·. : ' ./ .~·:.) . \ \ ,., " •• L ll 2'. 25 50 I" =BO' ~ ~ ~ ~~ a:~ 8 (!) ,_ ~ ~ Ill <· <l !."I' 0 __, I- ~ UJ UJ I <SJ ·~-,- -- - oc Ill ffi ; r ~ z G ~ ~~ ~ iL SSMH5 STA. 12+84, !JO' LT. STA. 11+64, !JO' LT. (148TH AVE NE) .,',-· ,~e·.·,.·,,,,M j EX. SSMH • . • • • ;t:: •.... ····················•····•~Y'S··• ···• I~~ ·......:: I~ . . . '"' -, . vi ~'"' '-.' . . <;<;c . ;:,-. '5,~ '5· "-! "'~ ~-'-'' ...._.-...;: ......::-.1 • ~ ~ :-. ll-. . "-1,J 1:1:: ' o;, o;, . ,·, -·-"•·····-"'",-' . · · • @()0220 12o!P B · . 14BTHAb'ENE • <:> '· \_ •. ,,,, ,, ... .,,.,.-,.w· ' \ i \ \ \ ' ! '··" . ' ' '·,,, . .\_ SEC. 1.1., TWP. 23 N., RGE 5 £, W.M. - \~\ SCALE: 1 '' = 40' ',\,,,, ...... \ \ I \ . \ • ---'i:- .. i i \ a 20 40 ea ~ BENCHMARKS OWNER/APPLICANT TOP OF THE MONUMENT AT THE ltEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 11-23-5, CITY OF RENTON POINT NO. 2101 EL.= 51201 FEET (OR 156.060 METERS) PLEASANT PA TH. LLC 9805 N.£ 116TH ST., SUITE 1499 KIRKLAND, WA 98034 PHONE· (425) 185-2810 DATUM ENGINEER/SURVEYOR NA fV 88, PER CITY OF RENTON VERTICAL CONTROL CORE OESICN, INC. BASIS OF BEARING 14111 N.£ 29TH PL., SUITE 101 BELLEVUE, WA 98007 PHONE· (425) 885-1811 N0077'JO"E BETWEEN THE MONUMENTS FOUND IN PLACE AT TH£ ltEST QUARTER ANO SOUTHM:ST SEC(ION CORNER OF SECTION 11-23-5 PER THE PLAT OF WINDWOOD Dlv!SION 3, REF. !. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: LOT A OF KINC COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER 115040 RECORDED UNDER RECORD/NC NUMBER 15032805/8, IN KINC COUNTY, WASH/NC TON,· EXCEPT !HE NOR!H 100 FEET OF THE IIEST 267.96 FEET !HEREOF. PARCEL B: THE NORTH 100 FEET OF THE /ffST 261.96 FEET OF LOT A OF KINC COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER 115040 RECORDED UNDER RECORD/NC NUMBER 1503280518, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. '···---. ---···-··-.,...-·.-........:.; '····'""'/"...:-:q .. :::-~ - ?/ ~' / . --------' ---..,.-' . . --;--~ --,. /. . . ? /. ~=-=-=~-------~-----r ·,-,- · / · ./ . ; / . n . . /.' ....... / ... ! ...... . / / • • • • 5.:'J'5 ............... J ....... ,'L.1 .. . . . . . . 8' §0 0233 • • 1/9L( . • .. • . • • ' ........ ' ....... '.' ..... '. . .... ' ........... ' ' ....... ' ........ ' ....... ' ' ..... --·· ·pr?·· O'F°IZL·E· · · . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . : . . 1-(0RIZ SCALE: • t • 50' • 'IERT. SCALE.· · 1• 5' · • •ROAD A, TRACT BANI) TRACT C • .1------'------'------'-------'-------'-------'-----c__----'----l....--~----'------'----~------'----------------------------__J _o z SANITARY SEWER NOTES !. ALL WORK MATERIALS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE W!TH TH£ STANDARDS ANO SPEC!RCATIONS OF THE CITY OF RENTON UTILITY DEPARTMENT ANO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE l'r5001/APWA STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2. THE HOURS OF WORK IN THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL 8£ UM/TEO TO 8:30 AM TO 3·30 PM ON lff£KOAYS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED IN WRIT/NC BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AT 425-4J0-720a ALL STREET CLOSURES, PARTIAL OR FULL, SHALL 8£ APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, RRE DEPARTMENT, ANO 911 SHALL BE NOT/RED 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE J. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL 8£ IN ACCORDANCE WllH 'STANDARD SPECIRCATIONS FOR MUNICIPAL PUBLIC WRKS CONSTRUCTION' PREPARED BY !HE WASHINGTON STA TE CHAPTER AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC/A TlON (APWA), LA TEST EDITION ANO THE CITY OF RENTON STANDARD SPEC/RCA TIONS. 4. ALL LOCATIONS OF EXIST/NC UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ANO IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR's RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE TRUE AND CORRECT LOCATION SO AS TO AVOID DAMAGE OR DISTURBANCE 5. A PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE ANO A 24 HOUR NOTICE SHALL 8£ REQUIRED PRIOR TO START/NC NEW CONSTRUCTION. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR's RESPONSIBILITY TO SECURE ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO START/NC CONSTRUCTION. (INSPECTION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITY OF RENTON). IT SHALL BE !HE CONTRACTOR's RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY tHE UTILITY DEPARTMENT 24 HOURS IN AO VANCE OF BACK RLLINC ALL CONSTRUCTION. 6. CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MEANS, METHODS ANO SEQUENCES OF CONSTRUCTION ANO FOR THE SAFETY OF WORKERS ANO OlHERS ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 7. IT SHALL 8£ THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN STREET US£ ANO ANY OlHER RELA TEO PERMITS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. . 8. PLANS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SHALL TAK£ PRECEDENCE OVER ALL OTHER PLANS. 9. A COPY OF THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON TliE JOB SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. 10. · THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROV/OE THE CITY OF RENTON WITH AN AS-BLIILT ORAW!NC OF THE SANITARY SEY.ER SYSTEM WHICH HAS BEEN STAMPED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENC/NEER OR LICENSED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR. 11. BACK RLL SHALL BE PLACED EQ/JALL YON BOTH SIDES OF THE PIPE IN LAYERS WITH A LOOSE A VERACE DEP!H OF 6 INCHES, MAXIMUM OEPTH .OF 8 · INCHES, THOROUCHL Y TAMP/NC EACH LA YER TO 95% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY. THESE COMPACTED LAYERS MUST EXTEND FOR ONE PIPE DIAMETER ON EACH SIDE OF THE PIPE OR TO THE S/0£ OF THE TRENCH. MATERIALS TO COMPLETE THE RLL OVER THE PIPE SHALL 8£ THE SAME AS DESCRIBED. 12 OPEN CUT ROAD CROSSINGS FOR UTILITY TRENCHES ON EXIST/NC TRAVELED ROADWAY SHALL 8£ BACK RLLED WITH CRUSHED ROCK ANO MECHANICALLY COMPACTED. CUTS INTO EXIST/NC ASPHALT SHALL BE NEATLINE CUT W!TH A SAW IN A CONTINUOUS LIN£ A TEMPORARY COLO MIX PATCH MUST 8£ PLACED IMMEDIATELY AFTER BACI< RLL ANO COMPACTION. A PERMANENT HOT MIX PATCH SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN 10 OAY.5' ANO SHALL 8£ PER CURRENT CITY OF RENTON STANDARDS. . 13 OA TUM SHALL BE CITY OF RENTO.I>/, NA fV 1988 (METERS) ANO NAO· 1983/1991 (METERS) . 14. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED ANO MULCHED OR OTHERWISE STABILIZED TO THE SATISFACTI01V OF THE DEPARTJ.IENTFOR TH£ PREVE,VT/0,V OF ON-SITE EROSION AFTER THE CO/vf PLETION OF CONSTRUCllON. · . 15. ALL PIP£ ANO APPURTENANCES SHALL BE LAID ON A PROPERLY PREPARED FOUNDATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1-023(1) OF THE CURRENT STATE OF WASHINGTON STANDARD SPECIRCATIONS FOR ROAD ANO BR/DC£ CONSTRUCTION. Tli/S SHALL INCLUDE NECESSARY LE'IEL!NC OF TliE TRENCH BOTTOM OR THE TOP OF THE FOUNDATION MATERIAL AS ltELL AS PLACEMENT ANO COMPACTION OF REQUIRED BEDDING MATERIAL TO UNIFORM CRAOE SO THAT THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF PIPE WILL BE SUPPORTED ON A UNIFORM£ Y DENSE UNY/ELD/NC BAS£ PIPE BEDDING SHALL 8£ PEA CRA VEL 6" ABOVE ANO BELOW THE PIP£ 16. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE POLWINYl. CHLORIDE (PVC) RUBBER CASKETEO ASTM O 3034, SOR 35, C900, OR OUCTlLE IRON CLASS 50. SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN TO 8£ CEMENT LINED DUCTILE IRON PIPE CONFORM/NC TO LATEST RE'I/S/ON OF AWWA C/10 & C!!!, THICKNESS CL. 52. 17. IN UNIMPROVED AREAS, MANHOLE TO EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 6" ANO A MAXIMUM OF 18" ABOVE RN/SHED GRAD£ IN PAVED AREAS, COVER MUST SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTlONS TO MATCH PAv!NC. 18. ALL SANITARY SE/ffR IMPROVEMENTS SHALL 8£ CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE MTH THESE APPRO'IED PLANS. ANY DE'IIA TION FROM THESE PLANS l'lfLL REQUIRE APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER, ENC/NEER AND APPROPRIATE PUBLIC AGENCIES. 19. LOCATIONS OF ROAOWA rs; BU/LD//VCS ANO PARK/NC AREAS SHOWN HEREON ARE APPROX/MA TE. FOR 0/MENS/ONEO LOCATIONS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS, REFER TO !HE ARCHITECTURAL Sil£ PLAN. IMPROVEMENT ANO STRUCTURE LOCATIONS SHALL BE RELO SET BY TliE ENC/NEER AS REQUIRED. .. 20. · ALL MANHOLES SHALL BE PER THE CITY OF RENTON STANDARDS ANO SPEC/RCA TIONS. ALL MANHOLES SHALL HA 'IE A MINIMUM 0.10 FOOT TO MAXIMUM 1.0 FOOT DROP 8£TW£EN INVERT IN ANO INVERT OUT. ALL MANHOLE COVERS SHALL 8£ ADJUSTED TO FINISH CRAOE PRIOR TO RNAL PAV/NC OR LANDSCAPING. 21. ALL TRENCH BACK RLL SHALL 8£ COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 95% OF THE MAXIMUM ORY DENSITY PER ASTM D-1551-10 (MOO!REO PROCTOR), FOR TliE RRST THREE FEET ABOVE !HE PIPE. THE REMAIN/NC BACK RLL MAY 8£ TO 90% IF NOT IN AN AREA OF FUTURE PAVEMENT OR STRUCTURAL RLL. TRENCH BACK RLL ANO COMPACTION SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO TEST/NC LINES FOR LEAKAGE 22 ALL SIDE SEWERS SHALL BE A MINIMUM 6" DIAMETER ANO HAVE A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 20%. PROPERTY/LOT CORNERS ANO/OR BU/LO/NC LOCATIONS ANO FINISH GRADES SHALL 8£ ESTABLISHED IN THE REL.O PRIOR TO ANY SEWER CONSTRUCTION. SIDE SEWER TEE STATIONS ARE REFERENCED FROM THE NEAREST DOWNSTREAM MANHOLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCURATE AS-BUil T RECORDS OF ALL SIDE SEWER LOCA T/ONS. ALL SIDE SEIIERS SHALL BE TESTED AT THt TIME OF MAIN LINE TESTlNC. PIPE MATERIAL SHALL BE C900 FOR DEPTHS OVER 15'. ' 23. WHERE A WATER MAIN CROSSES ABOVE !HE SANITARY SEM:R, ANO LESS THAN 3V" OF VERTICAL CLEARANCE EXISTS BETWEEN THE TOP OF SEWER ANO BOTTOM OF WATER MAIN, THE SE/ffR SHALL 8£ CONSTRUCTED OR RECONSTRUCTED Willi DUCTILE IRON PIPE (CLASS 50) FOR A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL DISTANCE OF 10' ON EACH S/0£ OF TH£ WATER MAIN CROSSING. 24. SANITARY SEY.ER MAIN LINES (8" DIAMETER ANO LARGER) SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED ANY CLOSER THAN 10 FEET TO ANY BU/LO/NC OR 5 FEET TO ANY CARPORT. . . · •, 25. NEW CONNECTIONS TO EXIST/NC FACILITIES SHALL BE SEALED OFF UNTIL UPSTREAM CONSTRUCTION IS RN/SHED, TESTED, CLEANED ANO ACCEPTED. ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS ANO WATER SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO OPEN/NC THE SEAL. ALL TEST/NC SHALL BE IN !HE PRESENCE OF A CITY OF RENTON INSPECTOR. . 26. PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OF CONSTF/UCTION ANO/OR ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS, ENCINEER/SURVEYOR-CERTIREO AS-BUILT DRAWINGS MUST BE PREPARED OF ALL SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES. · · · · -· 27. INSTALL FALL RESTRAINT SYSTEM IN ALL SANITARY SE/ffR MANHOLES OVER 20 FEET DEEP. FALL RESTRAINT SYSTEM SHALL BE "SURETRACT CLIMB/NC ANO FALL PROTECTION SY.5'TEM: AS MANUFACTURED BY "MILLER FALL PROTECTION~ ' ' ,, , I ' ' ( , - ) , I - [)T I 1-1:,-+--I-J..J.1 - ' f VIC/Nln 1 MAP ,· = 1200'± , UNDERGROUND LOCATOR SERVICE CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! 1-800-424-5555 RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL B: VAT£.·~ DATE.·~ BY:------DATE.· -- 14111 NE 29th Place Suite 101 Bellevue, Washington 98007 425.885.7877 Fax 425.885.7963 ENGINEERING· PLANNING· SURVEYING CORE JOB# 06083 SANITARY SEl'ER PLAN, PRORLES AND NOTES cs.or : ; j ' """""""~w,., i / """""""'' -,~.---·-··.·, .. · Ii , \ ' il : ; ; •: ,, ' : ' ,;,, ;. _, __ , ' g;: : ' 'l'c':i .... ..d: .-m ' ' . ' .. ,', ' 1 1 G. C. ( I .JL: : } I ' t I . -" ' ' Fir""'£ (. ""-. ,ii_-,_ ' • C .... , """' '"·I [;/ I ' ' ' --'-'h-..:q.-1--~1--+--./. ' ' ' -.-, -L2JI 31 ; , -·ii:: • I ' 'Li ' , ''" ' .·• .•, '" '1 ' 11 I )r " '. i i TR££ (T ;)) J i . ,. ,,, I I J! L2.JI ' ' -·· ---SH1JiJ/J•1T'r'P.) ,? I ',,,, L2.J! ,. ., ......................... ' ~: t ' : : ; ' : ii j 'I I 1.r ',, :• l • •• I . • .. ··... ' ;· i ···.'y" i ' ' ·-J I . J !''·~,., ' .. ,1-; g, i i"· i ',,, .. ,·?}f i : !_'l,\, , ,. ' .; •. I ";- ·, \ /· '.\ • • . I ·, ,'. ' . ''i ·:: I . IJ, ' ., i I . J, ·,i :: ;·•,,j : il i '"°'"H"."S>.··· I, ,..... I : ') ~ : i LEGEND PROJECT NOTt {SEE SHEET BELOW} RAIi FENCE LANDSCAPE 80/JLDER ' \ 1 £DC£ (T'r'P.~ ' ' i 2 7 L2.JJ cp <P. >ri-- 1 a;) ..., I ' ' \ u1 : "' I i 'f' ! iO ' l;'1J ' ""\ : ' I"' :~ ' ' ' \_ • o_· 0 :;: ~- l ' ',' ~"--·-~- REC. SPACE CALCS. SITE AREA: NUMBER OF LOTS: RECREATION SPACE REQUIRED (B X 390 S.F.): RECREATION SPACE PROVIDED: PLAY AREA CALCS. PLAY SPACE REQUIRED (B X 45 5.F.): PLAY SPACE PROVIDED: 190, 123± S.F. (4.36± ACRES) 8 3,120 S.F. 8,925 S.F. 360 5.F. 1,310 S.F. 8 \ ' ' -. ' " ' ''"•• ,J \, ' . . ,,,,,; . ,.. ""''' ·. S71?££T TREE (T'fP.); SE£ STREET TR££ PLAN FOR INFORMA 110N ... ~--- ' ,,• G PLA X' STRUCTURE . 5 F SEA Tl WALL (T'fP.) t -GRASSPA 1-f"RS,(S££ C!'IIL) •, ', ', ·,_ e"'" \_ \ \ ....... •"" .. _/ / \ SEC. 11, TWP. 23 N, RGE 5 EAST, W.M. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ,--·' \ ' ' ' ' ' \ ' " ' '' ,.:.1 : > '" , ! s".( 625.00 I ', ' " ·.,, 0. \ .............. ,., .. -. ''"~'""• "' .... ------'"" " ,· ,· " ,/ ' i l / ; " _; / " // /• ' f \ 4,. ,, '. ·--', .. ,' (' ... , ' \, '· ' \ \ '· '". --. \ \ ;'-/,,' @::::=::==~==c-r:--_J_~ '''"·····"'" -. ..... .__,, ..... , .. ~-... ,, \ ' . '· ,'i .i ---'l ;! 1! Ji ii ,, ,, ·i ii I I ij I: -i .7 ·, .,_-,- ' 6 .. ·=··" •-'"' .,. ' ) T + \ \_ ' ' i ' / i ( ', ' ' ' ' ' . "'"" ---· ' . ' ./ { ' ' ' i ' i' J \ PLANT SCHEDULE QTY BQTANICAL NAM£ COMMON NAM£ SIZE SPACING COMMENTS TREES + 5 CORNUS 'EDD/E's IH-IITt WONDER' £OD/ES /H-1/Tt WONDER DOGWOOD I. 75• CAL MIN. AS SHOWN 4 TS/JGA MERTtNSIANA MT. HEMLOCK 6' HT. MIN. AS SHOWN SHHt/8S 0 82 !LEX CRENATA WNi-fXA' CONi-fX JAPANESE HOLLY 2 GAL MIN. 3.5' a. C: GROIJNDC()',FR 1,535 TRIANGi/LAR SPACING; ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-URS/ KINN/KINNICK 4• POT 18" o.c. 2• Mil/CH CO!f'RAGE sf MIN. IN BEOS Tl/RF 4,322 LAWN JB PREMIUM SEED OR SIMILAR sf PROJECT NOTES G) PICNIC TABLE: FAIRWEATHER F-4 ADA TABLE. RECYLED PLAS11C, CEDAR COLOR. MOUNT PER MANUFACTVRER's SPECIF/CA 1/0NS. CI) TRASH RECEPTACLE.· FAIRWEATHER TR-I MODEL (OR APPROl-f"D £QUAL).R£CYL£0 PLAS11C. CEDAR COLOR. INSTALL AS PER MANUFACTVRER's SPECIF/CA TlONS BENCH: FAIRWEATHER LANDSCAPE SERIES, MODEL L-2 (OR SIMILAR). RECY!.£0 PLASTIC. CEDAR COLOR. INSTALL AS PER MANUFACTURER's SPECIF/CA TlONS 4' WIDE CRUSHED ROCK PATH {SEE DETAIL 4 ON SHEET L231) (f) LANDSCAPE 80/JLDERS: TO BE BANDERA YtEA THERED GRAN/ff WITH ROUND EDGES. PLACE BOULDERS INTO CLUSTtRS AS SHOWN (SE£ DETAIL 5 ON SHEET L2.JI) (TYP.). CD CD I.D. SIZE OTY. 00 1/2-1 MAN ROCK 2 @ 2-J MAN ROCK 4 /8' SEAT WALL (SEE Cl'IIL) PLAY STRUCTURE.· HIGHLANDER I, BY CORILLA PLA YSETS (OR SIMILAR). TO 8£ INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER's SPECIF/CA TlONS. 6' SAFETY FALL ZONE REQUIRED AROUND £NT/RE STRUCTURE (IMAGE BELOW). 5££ DETAIL 7 ON SHEET L231 FOR PLAY EDGE DETAIL) PLANTING NOTES I. THE LANDSCAPE CONll?ACTOR MUST BE LICENSED AND DR BONDED. CONll?ACTOR MUST BE EXPERIENCED IN LANDSCAPE WORK OF TH£ BEST 7l?AD£ PRACTlCE"S AND HAl-f" TH£ NECESSARY EOUIPM£NT AND PERSONNEL TO PERFORM WORK. 2 TH£ LANDSCAPE CONll?ACTOR SHALL 8£ RESPONSIBLE FOR FAM/UAR/ZING HER/HIMSELF WITH TH£ SIT£ ANO ALL OTHER SIT£ IMPROl-f"MENTS PRIOR TO THE START OF LANDSCAPE WORK. 3. TH£ LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL 8£ RESPONSIBLE FOR TH£ PROT£C110N OF ALL U11L/1l£S AND US£ CAUTlON WHILE EXCA VA TlNG IN ORDER TO A vV/0 DISTURBING ANY £XIS11NG UllL/11£5. TH£ LANDSCAPE CONll?ACTDR WILL PROMPTI. Y NOTlFY TH£ GENERAL CONll?ACTOR AND OWNER OF ANY CONFLICTS. IN TH£ £1-f"NT OBSTRUCTlONS AR£ ENCOUNTERED DURING PLANTlNG AC11Vl1l£S. AL TE!i'NA 111-f" LOCA TlONS MAY 8£ SELECTED BY TH£ OWN£R's R£PR£SENTA TlvE. 4. TH£ LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR WILL COORDINATE ALL WORK RELATED TO OTHER 7l?AD£S AS REOUIREO. 5. TH£ LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL PLANTS OF TH£ CORRECT SIZE, SPECIES VARIETY, OUANTlTY ANO DUALITY AS SPECIFIED ON PLANT SCHEDULE AND SYMBOLS ON LANDSCAPE PLAN. IF UNA VAILABL£, TH£ LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTlFY TH£ OWNER's R£PR£S£NTA111-f" IMMEDIATELY AND PROVIDE TH£ NAMES AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS OF THREE NURSERY SUPPLIERS OR PLANT BROKERS THAT HAVE BEEN CONTACTED. SUBSTlTUT/ONS SHALL ONLY 8£ MAD£ UPON TH£ APPROVAL OF TH£ OWN£R's R£PR£S£NTA 1/vE. 6. ALL PLANT MA T£RIAL SHALL 8£ INSPECTED ANO APPROVED BY TH£ OWN£R's R£PR£S£NTA 111-f" PRIOR TO PLANTlNG. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO TH£ AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK BY AMERICAN ASSOC/A 110N OF NURSERYMEN (ANSI Z60. I}. 7. TH£ LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL OEL/1-f"R, MAINTAIN AND WA T£R PLANT MATERIAL UNTlL OWNERS FINAL ACCEPTANCE" IS R£C£/i-f"O. 8. TH£ LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAK£ ALL NECESSARY PR£CAUT/ONS TO PROTECT ALL PROPERTY, INCLUDING PAl-f"M£NT, WALKWAY$, CURBS. FENCING, STRUCTURES. £TC. DURING CONSTRUCTlON. I 9. TH£ LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL 8£ RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING INFORMED OF ALL £XIS11NG CODES. LA/!5' ANO ORDINANCES RELA 1/NG TO TH£ WORK R£0UIR£0 ON SIT£, ANO SHALL COMPLY ACCORDINGLY. 10. TH£ LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH TH£ GENERAL CONll?ACTOR TO ASSURE PROPER SUBGRAD£S AR£ MET. THESE INCLUDE 6' BELOW FINISHED GRAD£ FOR PLANTlNG BEDS AND 4• BELOW FINISHED GRAD£ IN LAll?V AREAS. II. TH£ LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THREE REPRESENTA 111-f" SOIL SAMPLES TO TH£ 0/l?VER's R£PR£S£NTA11VE FOR APPROVAL, BY AN APPROl-f"D SOIL TESTlNG LAB.ORA TORY. AMENDMENTS SHALL 8£ ADDED TO TH£ SOIL MIX AS R£COMM£N0£0 BY SOIL TEST/NC LAB. 12 TH£ CONll?ACTOR SHALL 8£ RESPONSIBLE FOR BR/NC/NC PLANTlNC BEDS ANO LAll?V AREAS TO FINISHED GRAD£ USING APPROl-f"O TOPSOIL. TOPSOIL SHALL 8£ PACIFIC TOPSOIL THREE-WAY MIX OR SIMILAR AND SHALL HA 1-f" A PH RANG£ OF 5. 0 TO 6. 5. 13. TH£ LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TOPSOIL TO A DEPTH OF 6" BELOW FINISHED GRAD£ IN PLANTlNG BEDS AND 4' BELOW GRAD£ IN SODDED LAWN AREAS. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ROTOTlLL SOIL A MINIMUM OF 6' INTO £XIS11NC SOIL LA YER. 14. TH£ LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL RAK£ PREPARED AREAS AND REMOl-f" ANY ROCK OR DEBRIS OVER I~ IN LAWN AREAS ROLL FOR FIRMNESS TO PROVIDE A UNIFORM SURFACE WITHOUT DlvVTS OR MOUNDS. 15. TH£ LANDSCAPE CONll?ACTOR SHALL SET FINISHED GRADES BELOW EOG£ OF HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS, PRIOR TO MULCH PLACEMENT, AT 3" FOR PLANTlNG BEDS ANO I" FOR LAWN AREAS. 16. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A 2" DEEP LA YER OF MULCH IN ALL PLANTlNG BEDS. 17. MULCH SHALL 8£ FIN£ GROUND FROM FIR OR HEMLOCK OF UNIFORM COLOR, FR££ FROM WEED SEEDS, SAWDUST, WOODF/8£RS OR ANY OTHER COMPOUND DETRIMENTAL TO PLANTS. 18. F£R11LIZ£R SHALL BE A COMPLETE COMMERCIAL BRANO F£Rll[IZE.'/_ WITH COMPLETE CHEMICAL ANAL YS/S SHOWN ON AN UNOPENED CONTAINER WHEN DELIVERED. FERTlLIZER SHALL BE APPLIED AT RATES CONSISTENT WITH THE MANUFACTURER's RECOMMENDA TlONS AND PER TH£ SOIL LABS RECQMMENDA TlONS. 19. AREAS TO 8£ CLEAN AND FR££ OF DEBRIS AND RUBBISH OUR/NG PROGRESS OF WORK UNTlL COMPL£110N. RAKE BEDS NEA Tl. Y TO AN £1-f"N FIN£ GRADE AROUND ALL PLANTS. ALL PA 1-f"D AREAS AR£ TO BE CLEANED WITH BROOM ANO WASHED AS NEEDED. ALL PLANTlNG AREAS ANO ADJACENT PAl-f"O AREAS SHALL 8£ LEFT IN CLEAN CONDI 110N, UPON COMPL£110N OF WORK. 20. IF A DISCREPANCY EXISTS BETWEEN THE PLANT OUAN1111£S ON THE PLANT SCHEDULE AND THOSE SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE QUAN 1111£S ON TH£ PLAN SHALL GO VERN. 21. ALL 71?££S ADJACENT TO PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS ANO 1-f"HICULAR C/RCULA 110N ROUTES SHALL 8£ LIMBED UP TO 8'HT. /RR/GA llON NO TES I. STREET TREES TO BE MAINTAINED BY TH£ ADJACENT LAND OWNER. 2 /RR/GA 110N IS OPTlONAL: /RR/GA 110N DESIGN FOR PROJECT TO 8£ BY BIDDER DESIGN. 3. /RR/GA 110N DESIGN TO BE COMPLIANT WITH KING COUNTY STANDARDS AS PRESCRIBED IN KCC 2/A. 16.330 -.370. L08MID75 K.C. o.o.E.S, King County ilepar tr1ent of Developnent o.nci Environr11ento.l Services APPROVAL FOR SITE CONSTRUCTION Review Engineer ENGRCDMP Dote SCALE: 1 '' = 30' DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER COMPLETE Dote CoMnents: t...J.-t....Jo SENIUR ENGINEER Dnte STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT >- (j] -0 z J SHUA PENNINGTON BEARD CERTIFlCATE NO. 938 -"' "' "' z ('.) z "' PROJECT NUMBER 06083 DRAWING L2.01 SHEET 130F 14 ' 0 DETAILS l 1 1/2 x ROOTBALL DIA. 2 STAKING N01£S: RUBBER HOSE AT TR££; ~ HOSE SHALL BE LO/IC ENOUGH TO ACCOMMOOA TE 1 lf'ARS GROWi/i ANO BUFFER ALL BRANCHES fli'OM THE MRE. J HAROWOOO STAKES OR -~ OTHER APPROVED MATER/Al; ALL STAKES TO BE OR/VEN OUTSIDE THE ROOTBALL, AT 120· SPACING CAL VAN/ZED MRE OR CA8l£,• -~ TWIST MR£ TO TIGHTEN 0//l Y ENOUGH TO KEIP FROM SLIPPING {ALLOW FOR SOME TRUNK MOVEl,/ENI). J' MIN. I 1/2 x ROOTBALl DIA. 8 ,---GROIINDCfJVER ,,--2' IA '/ER MULCH AS SPEC/f/ED OIi PLANS; TAPER TO CROMv ~-f/N/SHED GI/ADE: +=>'-a::.---ROOTBALL -1!!=-----TOPSOIL BACKflll &-FDITIUZER _,,~~-----CVT NEYIROOTMASS TO S TIMULA TE NEW ROOT GROWTH '----UNDIST/JRBED NAIIVE SOil GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL l NTS ~-PLANT SET CROWN OF PLANT AT RN/SHED GRADE ,--2• LA YER MULCH AS SPEC/RED ON PLANS; TAPER TO CROWN ,.------SAUCER 2" HIGH _,,----RN/SHED GRADE !.---ROO TB ALL ~~----TOPSOIL BACKRLL & F£R71LIZER "'"" ROUGHEN ALL SURFACES 2 x ROOTBALL DIA. OF PIT ....__ __ CUT NEW ROOT MASS TO ST/MULA 1E NEW ROOT GROWTH .....__ SOIL LA YER SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL • • • • NTS • • • • • •• ~------PRUNE IRE£ AS DIRECTED IN •••• • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • <I'. • • • • •• • g • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • PLAN TING SPEC/f/CA TIO/IS. ~-PLANT /REE SO THAT THE TRUNK CROYII/ IS vlS/BLE AT /HE TOP OF TH£ ROOTBAll; SET TOP OF ROOTBALL FLUSH TO CRADE; 00 NOT COltrR /HE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL MT// SOIL. ~--MIN. 3" MULCH; DO NOT PLACE IN COi/TACT MIH TRUNK. ~-4 IN. HIGH EARTH SAUCER AROUND EDGE OF PLANTING PIT. ~-f/NISH GRADE: .,-ROUGHEN EDGES OF PIT ;,.....--REMOVE ALL TWINE, MRE ANO BURLAP FROM TOP HALF OF ROOTBAlt N0/1-BIODECRAOllJLE MA /ER/AL SHAil 8£ --il~I,~---REMOltrD CO/,/P/£7£1 Y. i' llr TAMP TOPSOIL BACKf/LL ,t!}wo,, ~II 11 AROUND ROOTBALL BASE f/RNL Y KITH FOOT PR[SS{JRE TO A WO SHIFT OF ROOTBALL. 2 x ROOTBAll 0/A. "'--NATIVE SOIL IA lf'R "--PLACE ROOTBAll OIi UNEXCA VA TED SOIL PEDESTAL TO PREVDIT SEmlNG TREE PLANTING DETAIL NTS --·-· ' . ·-. ,, " ' - 4 5 SEC. 11, TWP. 23 N, RGE 5 EAST, W.M J' -2%P/TCH PATH EDGING DETAIL NTS L INTERLOCK/NC PLASTIC IANOSCAPE EOG/NG (PERMALOC OR SIMILAR); TOP OF EOG/NC TO BE A MAXIMUM OF 1/2" ABOVE SURFACE MATER/Al f/NISHEO GRADE {PITCH AWAY fli'OM SI.OPE) {T'!P.) COMPACT GRADES ADJACENT TO EOG/NC TO A 'l()/0 SETTUNC 3-1/2' COMPACTED CRUSHED ROCK (5/8" MINUS) TO 95% -PITCH AWAY FROM BUILDING -TYP. 12' ALUMINUM STAKES TO LOCK INTO PERFORMED LOOPS ON TH£ EOG/NC NOTE· I. l INTERLOCK/NC PLASTIC LANDSCAPE EOG/NC TO 8£ INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS SPEC/f/CA TIONS. BOULDER STOCKPILED ON SITE TO 8£ RELD LOCATED PER SITE PLAN 1/J OF BOLDER TO BE BURIED SHRUBS, GROUND CO VER, LAWN PER PLAN COMPACT SUB GRADE TYPICAL LANDSCAPE TREATMENT BOULDER DETAIL • "' ----. \ ,, '1 I : ' .. ' ' L ---- ' ' .. ----, / -.-. -r ----1 .· / '-I i --fl . ' I, ', I ' \ \ ' ----APPLY EXTERIOR WOOD GLUE TO NOTCHES (TYP) NTS CHAMFER TOP OF POST 45 DEGREES ---~ TO A DEPTH OF ONE INCH 10 FT. 4 -1/2 • DIA. PRESSURE TREA TEO LOOCEPOLE PIN£ POLE. SPACED 10 FT. O.C. J -1/2 "DIA. PRESSURE TREATED LOOGEPOLE PINE POLE, .. : \ ~----1----4 ' 1-'''1----==---===-----=--------==---'---,ii' /1-----1 -----' -. ················-.. ···• ..... _ -· ··--- - --·-11.1 J' ---, ,-----... ---···· --·--·-_-c_c ------.c·=---__ ' 1-----""-I ' ' ' I ' ; i ' - ' ' ' '· I ! \ ! I-,_,,-.. -____ -____ -. "'·· C, .. --1! t--------=---,,-=-------,.,,,-------... -----I ! !, I--_ ---, . ·--·------·------------------.: ----------------___ ::-..:::::-:-.:::~~-:. -·--~=:~·-'"----~----_:::-.--------:_~-" ~-~-------: ____ -~ ----------._ ·=---~------····--.-;_:---. ' .' ·-, ____ ----·_ i ', 'IERllCAL STEP GREATER THAN 30 INCHES. Al TERNA TE LOCATIONS MAY 8£ APPRO'IEO BY CITY. i ;' ' 1--_-_____ -_-__ ---l \' t-------------------------------l-' 1------< --:__ --, --;-• ----', : ---------------------~~----·_ -----:-.:_:= ~ -------·· _:---------: _--:-___ :--:_--;-:__ __ -::_-_ __ --:::::..·-~---::: __ ----:-__ ---==-----= -----~~~~--------:_-------~-.:..: --. --~ . ----' \ -·::---~·_: :__, __ -- i t-·~·· ----==----------------------~-~--..... 1-~~-1 IF ADJACENT SURFACE IS PAVEMENT, INSTALL-~ FLUSH W/ TIMBER EDGE AND SLOPE AWAY@ 2% (T'tP.) IF ADJACENT SURFACE IS TURF, RN/SH GRADE TO 1• BELOW TIMBER EDGE TO ALLOW FOR THICKNESS OF TURF, SLOPE AWAY AT 2% (T'tP.) 2% 4x6 PRESSURE TREATED TIMBERS (LP22). (4) DEEP MIN. OR, OPTIONAL 4"xf6" POURED IN PLACE CONCRETE EOG£ ,----PLAY SURFACE SHALL BE/" BELOW TIMBER EDGE TO REDUCE SPILLOVER OF SURFACE MATERIAL 12• OF GT IMPAX ENGINEERED RBER SURFACE MATERIAL OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT ----------········,;:__·,_·,r:,·,,1l;;isS·, ·,-filfJ.IJT'. ·,~ -~Ill]"' ·,:r:, i,ss··, :r:,· ·, +--+, ';r'C',;';.:,. ,, ... -"' ,--~ . .,,v"'·";:~:r;-, -) r_; -':). ,; -~. :c._.. ,;-,-·:; ._-,-::·-:·,:·r.-:7:-~_:·,.--·-_,.1/ = ;:::::1 l==I -. ·:•:,·•:·, '7-, "''"~ c· ,-,--,-,,c·c·c·cy·,-,,,.,v-,-,-,.-;••;-•;•• -;-,v v ·.-•, ,--•-· ,. •;•c••:·c, 7 v ·, v •; •; •,-,,,; ,-,,, ,,,-; -;,-•;--, ·;-, ·; •; i=n1 1 11 1 >>>~<:-,-::-.-:< ·:~,-:v:·_,:<<,:<:,:-,~-.-:-.-:,,:,-:<<,,:,,:=->>>>>>:-- GEOTEXT/LE FABRIC (ABOVE & BELOW DRAINROCK). SECURE 11MBERS W/ JO" /4 REBAR DRIVEN . THROUGH PRE-DRILLED HOLES STAGGERED @ /8" O.C., RECESS STAKES~· BELOW TIMBER SURFACE (ASSURE SNUG Fil). ~~,·,, vv ·~··u,,v,,,vvvYvvvv~v~v·;·,-,· -, ,; ·, 'J ,, ,, ,;, ''" ,•a•c·v-,,-;-v ·; ,, v v ,,-,; <; v ,, 7,;,v;,-, --1 ----~· DRAINROCK ---COMPACTED SUBCRADE (95%) r---2% SLOPE TOWARD DRAIN FROM CENTER PERIMETER DRAIN; 4" DIA. ADS POLYETHYLENE PERFORATED PIPE, CONNECT TO SITE STORM DRAINAGE S'fSTEM {SEE Cl.Of). 7 PLA Y AREA SURFACE & EDGE DETAIL NTS • / FINISHED GRAOE '; / '--'---~--- • •. ~ /2" DIA. CONC. ' FOO 11NG FOR If:~; .. ,,~ POSTS; PITCH ~---------~-=v'=.,,='-"Jc:1;; TO DRAIN (T'tP.) w 6 RAIL FENCE DETAIL DETAIL NO TES I. FENCING SHALL BE A PRE -OR/Ll£0 iJOWELEO RAIL FENCING S'ISTEM SUPPLIED BY SULTON POST ANO POLE, OR APPRO'IED EQUAL. 2. FENCING SHALL BE PRESSURE TREA TEO LODGEPOLE PINE. PRESSURE TREATMENT SHALL BECCA IN ACCORDANCE MTH APWA LP-22 TO A MINIMUM RETENl/ON OF 0. 4 ib./cu. ft. J. CORNER FENG£ POSTS SHALL BE 5-1/2' DIA. ANO LIN£ POSTS SHALL BE 4-1/2" DIA .. BY 6 FT. IN LENGTH. SPACED 10 FT. O.C.. 4. FENCE RAIL/NC SHALL BE J-1/2" DIA. BY 10 FT. IN LENCTH WITH J RAILS PER POST. 5. TH£ TOP OF THE POSTS SHALL 8£ 4 FT. ABO'IE f/NISH GRADE. 6. ALL POSTS ANO RAILS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE MANUFACTURE's WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS. NTS King County Depor t,ent of Develop,ent and Environ,entol Services APPROVAL FOR SITE CONSTRUCTION Review Engineer ENGRCOMP Date DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER COMPLETE Dote CoMeents: SENIOR ENGINEER Date ~ ~ 'S,! 8: 'C w I- <{ 0 -------------------- STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ..._ ~ I 8 ~ § 8 ~ c,:: !:i:l ~ ~ >-rn z 0 VJ > w Ct'. -0 z J SHUA PENNINGTON BEARD CERTIFICATE NO. 938 '< -.j '< -.j '< s::,' '" Cle: "' i:'.i Cle: "' i:'.i Cle: C!j i:'.i C!j "' C!j "' "' 0 0 w w > z z 0 D ,c O' {/) <{ Q_ w °' Q_ 0 0 <{ ~ ~ <t) 1--... ~ <: ~ ~ l.j 0.: ->- "' :,. "' :::, V) [,)' ~ ~ "' w :,; __J ..._ <( ~ u VJ ~ >-c_ 0-: O' w w D > <t z <( :, I-u w , 0 °' Q_ t.l """' """' ;:J::" i,.;;;: ~ ..... <:: ~ ~ ~ I ' u ~ z __J -<( ('.l wzz z C) -o-:s: O'.'. <( VJ O Ct'. -0 z Ct'. 0 <( m 0 & ~ ~ ; :s &s vj 0) ' f.....: ~ V) ;:s s::::i' <.c, <' ........ ~ ........ ~ l.,.j ~ < '.\: ~ ~ PROJECT NUMBER 06083 DRAWING L2.3.1. SHEET .1.40F 14 ---- ' .r -· SEC. 11, lWP. 23 N, RGE 5 EAST, W.M. :ttffs'g§fg I -) , ii I I 1~dr ABANDON EXISTING SERI/CE AT~ l 11 1 1 ,\ i. ' MAIN, REMOV,C-EXISTING WATER I I 11 I [ I L . ,' .... ,::,\:·~ t:·/F'E iE '::-"] ,j 9 :'. .··, 2'' f' ·, C ;-·=:FE :E IIETER; AND SAL VAf{ /:OrJY.f. go , I HH i I i ,, ·\ J r~a,.,i '516.5.s . \11 - 1 :11 r~rj: ,. : PARCEL NO. 1023059002 1,~'•.r-c-1··,-..,,.., I' "I -lr·---~-·-.... :.. 1i::.._'-:i.c:..i('.,·-·" .. _, ___ "'-.. ,'i ',!1'·z\rl -731,',11,' ·,·1, .. -~~,~;-.-.r,[-"'~·-·--_,_'"'· -·~--- 1·)" ,r'.· (~ "'>,' ") -~--n -t----,.~~--·-·-"· -~""""'~ -· "" ____ ,n,,:· •r::, __ ':;;..,..~-;..,.-;;-.:...l.'•.J •-··--•-•,•-,, --L-:,c•~. :~ I I I I! I,' I •~ "'j :" : ·----·•-• ------~·:::'""' ' ---~ -·--- ' \ , \ I \ FOR FILL/NC TEST/NC iff;o1 'rt/Jsf!1Jlc.: ·No CO,VNECTIONS TO THE MAIN ARE 'ALLl'Jwi!tJ "t})i;fk.1 THE j ~ ! I \. ., ,,, , / ; . I \ '/ \ \ \ I ! I ~iffif£z1fcf(;fsc;;iiIUJ5N.AJfM;i;~r;Y "if [;/oNJ --11i1 · 1 ~-· -1·11'~,f\ C,, 0 \ I ~ y::6~, ~~~~12/ 1 1 ;", • ;~,~ ~!;£f;01:xMJ' \" 'ri ffi, 1 f ) / l' , ; , ·. , , ( 1 '/ ... CAN BE REMOVED UPON DISTRICT ACCEPTANCE .~1·11 "s:i::;:i:: ~,I i Ir ' t '. ·r '. _,., :. 0 1F ~ ''l I I . , •1-a: 22 1 /.2' BEND (IFLx,!IJ' ·, ...... _ 1 11 ~,11,, ,.~ ~,,~1 l , ,1 .-.\ /,.,_ '/ - • ' ' , 1-::: ·. r' ,, • i ·-· · f ' 2 ' ' , '3 · COrv'C BLOCK/Nr. --.... , j STA.(1141r8'7'TH:5,A7;;N,R'ET.' iil1l Cl() '!11·1·.: ,,:;_ I (f..5165 FF51d5 ,fTJl 521.0 r .. ; -;,\ ~ ', I 1-12"x8" LONC SL£EV,C-t~ox/ 11 , ~ , ' 1i ~: f -,. ,, --..... :·,i-,' -\ -· . -i 1 L-""",-· --,, , ' ) \\ ..• ' .. \ · 1 ! , I:: I, 1r., ~lf' .. ,J-:; ~,r:0,/F \..~ .... ,. L'......_~·~-=-~-·r~-=-.~"'.·,....,--'~-_,." \ ...... COATED STEEL TAPP/NC TEE i ,I , : I , 1 , ri(I , 7; \ ' · '-.--\ \:\ ,~a" CATE VAL VE (flxMJ) !1 j ' 111, !\I ', \ ' ---'1 •':f... ........... • • .J .-·· ,,• . ', ·-,--,, 11··1\(f',,\ ,',, ... \ _... ' PARCEL NO CONC BLOCKING ; !l T I , '"[ ., 11 ·10• 1 .-· ~~-( ,\ ,,.-.• cB r,F'E : •• 1,1,2,,; , a"ilD!' , ·1 I ;~1 \;" ["'f"'r--·· ,,, ,4 ,if= T '\ , '"' , (.,. .,\ \ /023059021 STA. 0+32:'"E''lT.-C,i ··'f:l j ,j I' ,; 1 ,,, 1 ''-_,,,,;;,,o·/1:c'i,•.' '\iPF,,ft''~ / , . '°' -._ \' '-,.>, \ 1-B"x6"'i1i:i':'/FJJ}i{', 4: <1 ' I· ' T • r 'W"'·"~n,i",' = ,, 6 ) ·· '-'b · \ 1,. ,clf~'.,1,Y•lb ,,'j.j ,,,1/~·~,'": 1 1_ / jg~ 8"/DI ! /_'•.~ '.· ··,'-... '{:>0 s,.____\ \ / !~6" CA TE VAL v,r (R.xMJ) I I 1-, . Li I : i I . . I , • \ ··, s--- 30LFN6" DI ,j +, . -: i' : . ' 7:' 'l • -_-' 10) . ·-........ ···/···STA. 0+45 5• LT. /N5 1/4" MVO FIRE HYDRANT ASS'Y. ., ' Ii '1·r··r· 111-, ,-;-~·-~, ':~_ROAD .. \ . -,::::.··~ _ _../' I 1--10' PUBL/C-U71l. ' 1NAtR"l11e-ASS'Y PER\ PER ffV90 STANDARD DETAIL /'4 ,_a, i i ! l ,. 'r 1/\ r"'"'":t,--::, ': fl'.*'' ... -/1-J-----& WATER ESM't WD.9D sm\DTL /18 \ ; 1 1 11 ~ j 1 \ , ~ ..-·"""? -~ \ ,, c:c f 1. : 1 r----~-.. _1 "\ , \1 MECALUC RESTRAIN/NC GLAND . , . i ' I 1.,_,,,, ... c ,,. ,·· ·"c'c "'· \ \ . .-, , , / 4 l 1 ' . ' I ::....'2. ._ J --"1'"'1 . '-; \ I /j I Slit O+i5!,I 5 LT. ! 1~,,15' Bf ND (M,J).•. CHECK VALVEFssYPER ffV90 ! .,[, : 1 '1,, t1 J1' I SEPARATION' ~~\c._.,_ --~-··."'· ~~dK " ____ ,_ car BLO(SK/N/J'' .-· .. . . sTAN&ARo DETAIL 121 i :J/! i I ii 1 ;r · \I\BETHfEN 1VA rt1t, \,;~~~ ·.,-.: -,. . :\ /' ___ 1 // .. . JI . 1 I ;j , >Jt{D ,§"El/ER ______ (£ , , \. ... .-·, \ I,, 5 STA. Off/, 8'/L T. ·11 ··1 -11 ' :/' ! ·. ~' ----' " · · \ 1~a· 45· BEN_D (FLxMJ) i l1i ', · 1: i I : . \ I r-i;:;G~ . --", . ..··\, ~ . . \ FF 521'5 f-8" 22 1/2'· BENO (FLxMJ) . . i Jt/ 111 ! : 111 I \I 1-~AC _i'_'____i__ ·,~~ '\\ ',, CONC. BI.OCK!t-(C I I · 1 IJ .. , · · 1 , ----· ~\ '°) \,_ ·"·... 20' ACCESS A1VD . 1 : 'I '·I I i 1/' \ii 1 1 \ \ . ''--. \\~ 1 ~\\ . ' "' , U/LITY ESM'T I •;B .1\e'f, ,.,, , , ii ! i ! 1 · ~ , I.. . . \ .· · '·, . .., \' _11 1 \. f:,,1 ... · "fliiT t--\;-~ \ R.r.1 .. :;1.,s,, ~14 .,. r ·/' 11 1 1 "/ 1 ii\ \ '\ -~--~ ~~---1 \ L)/1 _ '.\ \ '12" I[ r•I 5G6,G+ \, r;j i 11!1 i i]1 '·I:~ --;-'~-5/d--•--~~-·--.. ' \. lf --, -·; -;;::::__ ____ ·-.. , 0+58.0 I \ ·1·•" 'E' ~,· ,-,~"71 1·-!··1 I Ii I ,111,' ' ' ~ \ \ I 1--~ ·----,: l.__ :::, I',' .)\..IL), .·.. .• ',i-~:-. ! I I j I r;/~ !( --. , -\ \ \ I ! , ~-.. ·~ \ . . . '/!' .. , ·---...... ·-~·it,_· · 1. . -'e!-.:t==;::_.i!±.1a .. , I , .-1· ,.;-· .. '1J;!--~ . ! : 11,._,,_ j , '. · . \,,· \, :1-. ,. --. · \-~ ,.-::; ,., .. JF -,,..._ ·r ! ! ·tW ,..; ~ -l---~-· · r SHAMROiK H£/CHTS PLAT r'E' rr1~·1-=-· 1--"' _,.,:·:;;:;;! '·-..... ! \ : f', \\ ·-c. c;1 \ J / I \ ····-...... :_-'C"J . H~r~i' S.Us:37 --·--~ .. /<>:---t,(;;.?' ··,,t·-··r~-~--'-r:\{ ' ,-·--"····--'·'"--i ·:;-. \ •. ,. 7.'-5 1 I u..,..,_·~-., __ t···~1·0, f)J/Dlfc un, ---=-~J..;;~;.;..._.::;,,<~ ,, .. · f.; , j , , --. ; ! I ----j _ IUOL/1 /IL. 1:2'' :E t-JE :;,o:: .. 2~i 1.---'.'.·-~~, •. ;/fP'' . ri.1 : . _/1_\~.;_.,\, ,~:.-.. i '1 i, ·" ··,,. ·""-·-.... _ I ~ & WATER ES1rtr 12" IE ':?/I' ~SC5.2'.? · 1 j I .. "'"" .. '-\...I l -...... ,. I i I I°.' .. ;~ r~\ .. : )'' ----~r.:·· -;_';:~n ' \\' \ ·-~-r-··-. ~ --'---~--, 1 + , i 1 1:1 ,r'-,., ; ; · LocA 1E As sH011N \ 8 · 1 ill ·, ,z 6 ... 520. ..... 510 ......... 1 .... · .......... 505 ...... . .............. 500 ..... . SE 123RD ST ' ' ,t-[10l ! J .i i i1 ., '· ',0 •, 1"'.8-0 ·22, 1/2' BEND (MJ) . ·, Ft;,, 520.2 I I FF 520.7'·,., FF 521.0_, ~. ·-. .i, C '1 !I : l ··-fJL;''"'· '.; coNc BLOCKING -' \ /0' ·-1· . . -~ ...... -·-',\ l , Ir ., 1· \ 15' PUBLIC /VA ,?ESl/'T 1i ! ! lri l PARCEL NO ·. \, g' i II/ 10LF 8" DI IO"ATE AS .,/ 11-23-05 '.' r; ! l 11 ,! /123059067 zo· PUBLIC ' . 10 ' PUBLIC ,-;-22 1/t;J;::O (MJ) 26 '.;:,1.,11<. ""'I ·,ue.cc \ ,,j i '··!-<l1[ r il lf'A:/Ff/-.£ 'T.:_" WA !ER £SM T CONC. BLOG!<, ALL ONSITE EAS[!/ENTS PARCEL NO 102305go2s ,I \ ·-:~: . c:S ' . "'-. . "' . . hi., . .~. .................. !O)···. . 'l.V) . . "' . ·-· I i '} ' · · CONNECT TO EXISTING; REJfov,r Ef!ST/NC . 0 ! f 1 '!E5T/1VG'"ii1VD FqUSHING NO CONNECTION,S TO THE MAIN ARE ; 30i BLOIIVfF A/ID SALVAGE TO IIV90. CONNECT TO ,;!I ' A!cLO!IED UNTIL! THE DISTRICT ACCEPTS JfRESSURE AND PURITY · ' EXIST/NC B"IJ! w/ 1cv8" COUPLING. CONTRACTOR TEST AND AUTHORIZES THE CONNECTION. TEMPORARY TO V,C-R/FY LOCA170N OF EXISTING 8" DI /YATER BLOWOFF CAN BE REMOV,C-D UPON DISTRICT ACCEPT4NC£ 6" /,(/N!cLR w/ ' .• If , . • £1/iA FOAM 9R , · SAND CUSHION -.,--~----:,~~-'-----~,........---. . -/l;~=""SEmEfmPts-~==.L::.:.cc ;_-~===·~·•;,··~ ""' 6." MIN CLR; w/ E_THA FOAM, QR -s---~, -" / ·,,..;-· -~ ....... ...... · SAND CUSHION BE fllttN PIPES .................. <.: .. . -~ · 111 ·Vl· .· :0 ·/ )/·' /! 0 0 ··~·············· " . . -~~. ~=· ·~~· !~ ~· ·"'-"'1 . : <;j . "-"'-. . s.::.i Q5 . . -. . : --.J . --. . . s.::-s ~--. ' "' i~ ~ ~ •.........• li.l.~ ..•....•....•.....•.. ) ....•....•....•....• ····~··•····· ..•.. ii·~2 ..• le ..... •';;j ~ • . "'1 . ' ~ ~ ';;j ,('.si:;,~. s fl : ,\;: "" "' . cc; . <c,. :f2~3_ .( 0 ----•, . . . ' .---: -1--....:. ·- ·3-· ·~· ~· ~ . i::, . . f::, . -·---t . ,a:. . ::a, . . l;iJ . . ,;:; . . . . ctj . ctj "' . ' ....... ~ . . . ~ .. . • ....•....•....•....•....•.... • ····• .. "k,• z-i . i;:i . . ,.... . . ....._,.;:;,-.... ......... . . . . . ·~. ·N ~(S· PROFILE•.• · HOR!Z SCAL£· I'' . 4,0' · . VERT. 1 SCALE.· /" 5( ' ) . ' " SCALE: 1" -40' 20 40 80 2-t::...J BENCH MARl(S TOP OF THE MONUAIENT AT THE !/EST 1/4 CORNER OF SEC/ION 11~23-5, CITY OF RENTON POINT NO 210! EL= 512.01 FEET (OR 156.060 . ,!IE7ERS) DATUM NAW 88, PER CYTY OF RENTON I/ER 1/CAL C01VTROL BASIS OFBEA,lr/NG N00'17'.JOt BETWEEN TH£ MONU.!IENTS FOUND IN fLACE AT THE ilf'ST QUARTER AND SOUTHWEST SEC710N CORNER OF SEC710N 11-23-5 PER THE PLAT OF lf/ND!VOOD D/115/0N j; REF. I. ........... ' LEGEND --.. ·--~--·/1 ,-:.. __ .,," . ,---' ,.. " 0 • :& EX!S71NC CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS TYPE 1 CB TYPE II CB CLEANOUT SS MANHOLE . FIRE HYDRANT WATER MEIER !RR/CA 1TON METER '"' CA TE VAL v,r BLOW-OFF ASSEMBLY . .~ AIR-VAC ASSEMBLY COUPLING ... 520. 510 ..... ' • NOTES f. POL YURAP TO 8£ USED ON ALL WA /ER MAINS. 2. CONTRACTOR Si/ALL PROv!DE POS/1/V,C-SLOPE ON WATER 1/AIN TO ASSURE AIR RELIEF. J. POL YLINES UNDER DRIVEWA l'.5 TO BE SLEEv-rD. 4. /YA !ER M£!ERS IN DR/V,C-WA Y TO BE INSTALLED 111TH TRAFF7C LOAD/NC BOXES AND LIDS. 5 !ND/11DUAL PRESSURE ,?EDUCING VAL v,rs ARE REQUIR£D FOR THOSE LOTS AT £LEVATIONS BELO/I' 465'. E:X!Sl/NC PR£SSUR£ ZONE 649 . 6. WATER EASEMENT OV,C-R TRACTS B AND C TO 8£ CRAN TED. TO /YATER DISTRICT go UPON RECORD/NC Fh\iAL PLAT. DWG· D-3020 BASE MAP: D-3 WATER DISTRICT NO. 90 APPROVED /J , CONSTRUCT~IO -I/ L/ .. DRAWINGS:~· l·='-~C-bC·-· -DATE,/g,.f,1.t:1,J . . . v . . y.1:£-t!t~r~~~-'{~\:r;;+;r;:;::.:-:s'a~~h"fr',l::;\~,-3~1;-::c~:.t:1ar~;:,:~,:,-"'~~,·,:#.i{f;Z~r~-2;R.1.~:~;,.i'~1';w,J:t?ii'~..-.?-.z~ ! UNDERGROUND LOCA1'0R SERVICE ii g • ·• CALL BEFORE YOU DIG/ ~' ~' 1-800-424-5555 ~ ! . I ~,'ir~j{/tti<'.'/":-it'&Xf£.~i:1i:f,·t;;t•tt'._-',:'p-,:;;;;;"~'it~:.\!:·f;t!!'lt'h'',;"{~~%;;]·_:";-;,:~~'.;;W}.:.t~-Jf'C~[f,;·¥,;;\,.c:e,"l~~Jti -·-e ~co "-g ~N "tJ ~. (I) ~ ~ ..... ~ e .Q :::s Cl) "I= -- -- 0 \) ci.: \0 (;J :s: ~ 1-..: V) "' ::i:: '<l >-.. \0 ~ e5 ~ ~ G ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "" ~ "' ~ C(j 6' Q :i:: ct: w '-' a! (5 ~ ::e >-.. i;5 ~ 8 >-.. ~ ~ \2 c:; ~ ~ [}i . c:,:: ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ::::: "' o· z ·->- (.') z - (.') z -"' u, u, z -(.') z "' I w u a! (5 ~ ::e >-.. ~ ~ 8 >-.. ~ ~ ~ c:; ~ ~ [e ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ - z..J _J -<( (.'.) ,,,: wzz u (/) Z 0-o-3' >-a: ,,,: LL lf) 0 oc oc ~zD w 9i 0 > . " C C" ,::.·_ .. L, C' L, ,. ""' C ( - ' C ' "' ;,,: Sj 4' CD &: ::i:: z c., < :,: "' "' 0 ::, 0 '!! c-w u z ~ 0 w C, w O' , c-"' "' D.. 0 "" w O'. CL O' 0 0 0 <c D.. .. ~ ~ g:: ;t; ~~ CJ) <...) CJ) . ct: ~ ~ -i ~Cl: -i I:::! "I· ;:J:;' s ~ . "' t-.::: tij CX) ~<: 0) ~· ' h.: ::"( 0.: V) :,;;. -- ~.~ ..... i:S SS' <!: '-a <: u1i ,.._, ""' "'-~ ~ Li'i Li'j l'-.j ~ ~ ~ ~~ ·rt '<') ~ ~o.: CJ) @ §©@GW JAN 2 7 200 K.C. D.D.E. , PROJECT NUMBER 06083 --·· DRAWING C6.01 -· SHEET 2 OF 5 0...------------------------------~--------..... D 0 L 0 0 0 0 U. IMPERVIOUS R/W {0.07 AC) llLL PASTURE (2. 48 AC) llLL LANDSCAPING (0. 41 AC) llLL FOREST (3. 47 AC) IMPERVIOUS LOT COVERAGE (1. 13 AC} 14711 NE 2911, Place, #101 Befle vve1 Wash ington 98007 425.8 85.7877 Fax 425.885.7963 ENGINEERING , PLANNING · SURVEYING UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PLEASANT PATH DATE APRIL 2008 DES IG NE D NWD DRAWN NWD PROJECT NUMBER 06083 [ [ [ [ [ D D D- u D 4 qe s 0.24 AC l 5 "' TRACT C \ JOINT USE DRIVE/11,ttY \ 6 SCALE: 1" = 50' 0 12.5 25 50 ~ ~. ::::.:...:=::: ::.;, ..,, 425.885.7877 Fax 425.885.7963 ~DESIGN . ENGINEERING · PLANNING · SURVEYING CATCH BASIN SUBBASIN MAP PLEASANT PATH DA TE APRIL 2008 D ES I GN ED NWD DRAWN NWD PR OJ E C T NU MBER 06083 / rl llrr I ru llfj Jl_ INLET3A CB 3 CB 3 CB 4 CB4 CB 5 CB 3 CB 6 CB 6 CB 7 CB 7 CB 8 2.53 4 1.02 50 0.75 51 1.17 75 0.76 65 0.73 19 12 0.012 504.10 509.55 0.79 3.22 12 0.012 509.55 509.98 0.79 1.30 12 0.012 509.98 510.25 0.79 0.96 12 0.012 509.55 513.40 0.79 1.49 12 0.012 513.40 513.92 0.79 0.97 12 0.012 513.92 514.02 0.79 0.92 57.52 0.1613 512.05 0.0170 512.07 0.0807 0.1613 512.31 510.55 0.0343 0.1420 0.5060 512.92 514.50 4.57 0.0264 512.92 0.0348 512.96 0.0132 0.0264 513.00 510.98 0.0143 0.0169 0.0000 513.00 513.02 3.59 0.0143 513.00 0.0193 513.02 0.0072 0.0143 513.04 511.25 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 513.04 513.32 11.16 0.0343 512.92 0.0679 514.40 0.0172 0.0343 514.45 514.40 0.0147 0.0343 0.0000 514.47 517.72 4.41 0.0147 514.47 0.0251 514.92 0.0073 0.0147 514.94 514.92 0.0133 0.0094 0.0000 514.94 517.64 3.57 0.0133 514.94 0.0067 515.02 0.0066 0.0133 515.04 515.02 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 515.04 517.64 ~ '·.· .. :·l· ';;i '!: ,: ~ . . ru . .. ru ' I l i::1 ;J ,f, I L.·!· .. ·.1 f!f_':, fl ~ ' . ' INLET3A CB 3 CB 3 CB 4 CB4 CB 5 CB3 CB6 CB6 CB7 CB7 CB 8 2.94 4 12 0.012 504.10 509.55 0.79 3.75 1.19 50 12 0.012 509.55 509.98 0.79 1.51 0.88 51 12 0.012 509.98 510.25 0.79 1.12 1.36 75 12 0.012 509.55 513.40 0.79 1.73 0.89 65 12 0.012 513.40 513.92 0.79 1.13 0.84 19 12 0.012 513.92 514.02 0.79 1.07 • .-,, ,_.,,., .. ,)1'· ,·:' 57.52 0.2182 512.51 0.0230 512.53 0.1091 0.2182 512.86 510.10 0.0464 0.1920 0.5525 513.56 514.50 4.57 0.0356 513.56 0.0470 513.61 0.0178 0.0356 513.66 510.98 0.0194 0.0228 0.0000 513.66 513.02 3.59 0.0194 513.66 0.0261 513.69 0.0097 0.0194 513.72 511.25 0.0000 0.0000 0:0000 513.72 513.32 11.16 0.0464 513.56 0.0918 514.40 0.0232 0.0464 514.47 514.40 0.0199 0.0464 0.0000 514.50 517.72 4.41 0.0199 514.50 0.0341 514.92 0.0099 0.0199 514.95 514.92 0.0180 0.0127 0.0000 514.94 517.64 3.57 0.0180 514.94 0.0090 515.02 0.0090 0.0180 515.05 515 02 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 515.05 517.64