The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFanny and Philip Yee. A'CTIVITY. LOG . File Name: __ .J.b...!.A?:.i.M=w:LL.r:-..Lz:!..i.o=-e=--___ ___; ___ _ ·.·Date Staff Activity (Note names, type of contact, issue, resolution) . ,,.,/· "-. -~ . t.J. r .. ~ .. , .,/} J ...;t: . • ~c, ~ :t-). , "'7'., -' cJ.!. • . , , •f. OI < ,_ 11 -I H I -• -C:C ,,,... .. . . - ',d· I_/,, ,.,., ~ "'/J A " ~ ' V --~-·n.. ... """ ·-.,, '. /.--... -a .. / I 6 /fl.JI A--~J)p. ·-/1!3-. . ~ 111,4,(S: Cf'b.s 1..\ ·-'L. 0 r ~ "'-·· y ,_' . -.,,1 " -ti...., ~ . I ... -• ._ • ' / .,, I' ............... ~: s;.... 21-.b C,,f'o > -~ .,,,. -• /}-<,/_ • , £1 ~ ,.//. .. r. ; " -~ ' ' .,. ' FSo/Ai::t.ivity,Log July 9, 1993--·):!,bpm/dj . A'CTIVITY LOG .. ,-.. File Name:_·--~.C_../j;:..,..n,Al=N.l<-4-r'-· __...L'""'l>f:'"""""°----- File No: ___ _.w....=...tf-2<PO 6 S- .···Date Staff Activity (Note names, .type of contact, issue, resolution) ~ em~ /A_,'J) (c/,z.£ J A; if;. • dK._ 7-/')..-' .. ' . . '-di -' fh1/'S /1 .. L ,t, I'. ~ /q. •_/) ,, ,, . ~ . e:..fb ~ ,, , /7 . . . 8.,,ur;-1. 0 PJLUct~- ' ~./-. L d. '. /,. . h• /'}. . ? . , ft . /1.7:L ~-? I , , .1. ' ·,~ ,,., ~ /Ill . 1A . -.. j. . Jl:J.... ~ -. . ·-~ , ·/-A 17 ' ? I> ... --I;-: II) . . . -• ' . .- :) ,fl -z!I-:-"T. • ~.1 V I ~ /. , -- • ,I .I ·~ /.. --: -~, J -~ _ _:_· /Zbr~. I .'tu~. . /."~. ~6',~.$ ~ /.,~ -; 77:". /} of)_ • -. (/ -n . /~---<y'fzt/ ·-. /1. ( II • V V f P2__//" C" OFo> MT£ LA-I PE 128/1 Teri J, . . '()Jrf 5 ' • 'I • /Jtt /jut:.. A,m, IMP; -l-677(:r... pf' 11trt."'N r I /11-llA=~P . Ptllr/A-1€ . . . I ';, ,,,,,,, ---()~e.JLN N oT K.Gfl.$ ' .,. 8-g'J-S {hf> h. '· './J. /) A ../ ,/,,"/;-;'_ ~ /) /'.. . -~ ;&. h. .1· ; /J . . .., . ' . .. /J, it:. (,t .. . /.," h:-T. .. . ~ ., .. . . A , ' .. . u Jf., • \ j ~ ~-'1.t." c; C.Fn <:. AA it. Lv/. :11.1.//_& •• ~ ~ /,J_ "_, : .~7.,§ .. }A . f_ / .JJ • ••:I /) 0 -~ ' - 1) fl/) ·/ -~~ u.,... ,,, -,I-/J ,,& . # .• --,,, ~ , 11,,:1 A ,{ . • . • .,g.__ k. •. -/A -.. . ---""" /) [/(}. ~./. //. I • .I : r.:. .;<,fA . -·- .. I ·/ q, f-~ c'--#A.a ,$-.7~ ,, . ~-~-;I) · _ __p .· fo.. ./:, / .. e, _~ ,, . /: •. A ~ • V v· -1, . . A • • I ~-1..'f-). c..Fos ~;a.;i&;~ '//. r.v !f>. ~ ~--~-~~A. 4,.. f°-All -.-,,{~,-/)~ ht. ?'o~~- . ~-?o-'° lFos · - ,1 V .J a ;:d;. -7 .• -/-:;.-1 A.·k ._,,~ -_j1 1.,,/I _ -/ """"--. , ~ d/z:,\. , / . L '5C,l)J~(J J.,+:1117/2,.1 le). /-j• ~ <...fOl c-.. _., -~ ·v·• ot}A--9",-:. ·ci :,,,. __ --.. ...... ,v:-_ ..... • 0 • N, 0...... 'IA-"' /J: . .A. J •........ ~ >J; -. . ,. 61't'l!\1G~ July 9, ol'.ifin},,1o,,. i v . -A 1'1t~ . .. F •· - A'CTiViTY LOG . File Name: /ztMNt' ~ · File No: LP456'J065 Date Staff • A'CTIVITY LOG F~H File Name: __ ...._/71i____.~~w'""'t:~~>:::,~c~e _______ _ File No: ···Date Staff Activity (Note names, type of contact, issue, resolution) iµt/5" ~s ,£/ ,_,. ,,,,-/, /J£MJ ~ A~~:t.~ ~ 7"' . AIC,. ..< . ~ -/t/P' 1? /Ut3E7JII//-: /0 ,4Jl1;1 We tR/,B t) 4-4 ~ ~k~ ~ ~ y.~.A/, / uf!f?-~ -,./.,?':-. ~ AA/• ,, _ ,, ,r -. , , /,. --~ z;;v~ ~VI Jlift~ -, ..... 1-t-n -7 () . ~ ,--I -/) , ,, ,, /-, ,,_J . , F/ ' Fl . ' , . II ·- ' f%//l.ctivity.Log July 9, 1993--·J:!1&1,m/dJ ~~~----------................. ........ Foster, Curt From: Sent: To: Subject: Floren!, Ray Monday, March 27, 2006 5:45 PM Foster, Curt; Simmons, Pat FW: Maintenance of off site roadway Raymond E. Florent, PLS DDES Chief Land Surveyor I Engineer IV Land Use Services Division Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 (206) 296-6790 Fax (206) 296-6613 Curt/ Pat, I modified the note below. Pat, please check that it meets the intent. Thanks, Ray From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Curt Simmons, Pat Thursday, March 23, 2006 11:46 AM Foster, Curt Florent, Ray Maintenance of off site roadway "'\~ ',, Here is a draft, you also could say a note that conveys a responsibility to each lot owner for the cost of the maintenance of the offsite roadway similar to: That would allow additional editing at final review. Ray Any comments Ownership of a lot within this short plat shall include an equal and undivided responsibility for the cost of maintenance of the access roadway and other facilities within the easement as shown on this short plat, pursuant to King County Engineers Subdivision No. 7257. The access roadway and other facilities are a condition of approval for this short plat, and are shown per the approved plan and profile, Plan No. P-__ _ This maintenance responsibility may be modified by a separate agreement to designate one or more lot owners within this short plat to be responsible for said maintenance. This modification must be approved and signed by all persons having an interest within said easement, and recorded with the King County Office of Records and Elections. These improvements shall be privately maintained until such time that they are constructed to the governing public agency standards, and that governing public agency agrees to accept the maintenance responsibilities of said improvements. 1 Foster, Curt From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Curt Simmons, Pat Thursday, March 23, 2006 11 :46 AM Foster, Curt Floren!, Ray Maintenance of off site roadway Here is a draft, you also could say a note that conveys a responsibility to each lot owner for the cost of the maintenance of the offsite roadway similar to: That would allow additional editing at final review. Ray Any comments I Each lot of this short plat shall have ancf equal undivided responsibility for the cost of the maintenance of access roadway and facilities within the easement per King County unrecorded short plat 7257 that was constructed; as a condition of this short plat, per the approved plan and profile, Plan No. P . This responsibility may be modified by a agreed to, and signed by all the beneficiaries of the original easement and recorded document or if the area is deeded to a public agency as right of way that the public agency agrees to accept the maintenance of these facilities. Thanks Pat Simmons 206-296-6636 I ' 5. 1993 King County Road Standards (KCRS) (KCC 14)-Final short plat approval shall require full compliance with the provisions set forth in the King County Road Standards (KCRS), including engineering plans for all road and site improvements. The engineering plans shall be prepared by a professional civil engineer licensed in the state of Washington. DOES strongly recommends that the engineering plans be submitted at least two years prior to the expiration date of the project. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads within this short plat shall comply with the following requirements unless otherwise approved by DOES (KCRS Section1 .03). A. B. The proposed road and cul-de-sac serving the property shall be constructed to urban minor access street standard per KCRS, Section 2.03. It shall extend from 1201" Avenue SE and continue into the site terminating into a cul-de-sac bulb as shown on the site plan per KCRS Section 2.08. The off-site portion of the road improvements may remain in the existing ~ ...... j Fo,matted: ~ndent: Lelt: 1•, easement. A note conveying an equally undivided responsibility (to each future lou Hanging. o.s owner) for the oITsite maintenance cost (for roadway and facilities within the easement) shall be v.Iaced on the final recorded ma~agc or recorded separately. Additionally, the ~ .::tl,._ A~;t;_ note shall include a s1atement allowing !he maintenance responsibility to be modified if ~ ~ agreed to bv all beneficiaries of the original easement including right of way dedication ~-~ .. ..,~ 0 -_ · --u to.a pJJblic agency~ (/ ··--~ ~C~. __ T,,,he Clrl:S_itEl_irnpr<l\lern_em~.s.h!!II bE!JllaCE!c!.i.n .. a_trl!C_t_._T_hE! trl!C_!__Shlll_l_l)El_a_n ..... { Deleted: Howe,e,, t undivided ownership to the lots it serves, and the lot owners shall be responsible for its maintenance. ,Q, ..... ThEl_l)rCll)\lSe<J_rcia_d_irnl)rciy_ernEln_ts.~h_a_ll_ad_9_re_s~_therE!CJUire_rnE!r1ts __ for_r_ol!d __ ..... ·{~0e_1e_ted_: c ______ _ surfacing outlined in KCRS Chapter 4. As noted in section 4.01 F, full width pavement overlay is required where widening existing asphalt. I;,. ....... _IV1Cldifi~ll\i_o11~ _to_ tl1E!. at>o_yE!. rcil!d __ cClriditiCJris __ rnl!y be. ~9_nsid_ered. _bx l<i~g ...... _ .... · · ~...,, o ______ =:) County pursuant to the variance procedures in KCRS 1.08. [. ..... Th El. fcillQIVi ng. rio_te_s. s_h_all _b_e __ sho~ri. on t_hEl _final. rElC.<;l!_decj. !!ho_rt_ .... subdivision: ________ ... ---{ ~ De_le_te_d_: E ______ _ (1) All private easements and/or tracts to be maintained, repaired, and/or rebuilt by the owners of the parcels having legal access there from and their heirs, assigns or successors, unless and until such roads are improved to King County standards and are dedicated and accepted by King County for maintenance. (2) All restrictions, easements, tracts, and their purpose shall be shown on the final recorded short subdivision. ® KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 REPORT AND DECISION SHORT SUBDIVISION File No. L04S0065 A. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED SHORT SUBDIVISION: This is a short subdivision of .96-acre site (two tax parcels) into six (6) lots for detached single-family dwellings in the R-6 zone. The proposed density is 6 dwelling units per acre. The proposed lot sizes range from approximately 3000 square feet to 5,300 square feet. Refer to Attachment 1 for a copy of the short plat map. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: Owner/Applicant: Consulting Engineer: STR: Location: Zoning: Acreage: Number of Lots: Density: Lot Size: Proposed Use: Sewage Disposal: Water Supply: Fire District: School District: Fanny and Philip Yee 11431 2381h Street Woodway WA 98020 Lang Associates, Inc. 10658 Riviera Place NE Seattle, WA 98125 SW Y. 33-23-05 12052 SE 129th Place R-6 .96 acre 6 6 du/acre Ranges from 3000 to 5,300 square feet Residential Soos Creek Water and Sewer District Soos Creek Water and Sewer District Fire District 40 Renton School District Complete Application Date: January 17, 2005 C. HISTORY and BACKGROUND The Subdivision Technical Committee (STC) of King County has conducted an on-site examination of the subject property. The STC has discussed the proposed development with the applicant to clarify technical details of the application and to determine the compatibility of this project with applicable King County plans, codes, and other official documents regulating this development. As a result of preliminary discussions, the applicant presented the Technical Committee with a revised site plan on January 9, 2006. The revision to address some of the technical issues was minor. No change to the road or lot layout was made. Report & Decision Page I of9 L04S0065 D. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 1. Topography: The site slopes down gently from west to east. The maximum slope is3%. 2. Soils: One soil type is found on this site per King County Soil Survey, 1973. The entire site is classified AgB. The following are characteristics of AgB soils: AqB -Alderwood gravely, sandy loam; 0-6% slopes. Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight. This soil type has moderate limitations for low building foundations due to a seasonally high water table, and severe limitations for septic tank filter fields due to very slow permeability in the substratum. 3. Wetlands: A wetland and report was prepared by Altmann Oliver Associates dated December 22, 2004. The report identified a small (175 sq.ft.) isolated shallow wetland partly on site. This wetland is exempt from regulation. The site lies within the Soos Creek drainage basin. 4. Vegetation: This site is primarily covered in grasses. Scattered evergreen and deciduous trees and sherubs occur in limited numbers. 5. Wildlife: Small birds and animals may inhabit this site; however, their population and species are limited due to nearby development. No threatened or endangered species are known to exist on or near the property. 6. The Sensitive Areas Folio does not identify any mapped sensitive areas as being present on this site. E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The property lies within a gradually urbanizing area east of the City of Renton. The proposed subdivision of Fleuve Des Voies, KC File L04P0002, with 38 residential lots is on parcels east of the site and is currently under review by DOES. There are larger lots with potential for re-subdivision to the west and north of the site. The properties south of the site are developed with single family residences. The site and the surrounding parcels are zoned Residential (R-6) with six dwelling units per acre. The proposed subdivision site is undeveloped. F. DESIGN FEATURES 1. Lot Pattern and Density: The proposed density and lot layout meets the density requirements of R-6 and the Short Subdivision Code. 2. Access/Roadway Section: The site obtains access to 1201 h Avenue SE via a 30- foot wide easement extending east from the road to the site. The easement will be improved to an urban minor access road standards consisting of curb, gutter and sidewalks on the north side of the road. 3. Drainage: Currently drainage from the property leaves the site in the form of sheet flow. After development, storm water runoff (from the proposed under ground vault) will be conveyed eastward (same direction) to a proposed development on the neighboring property. The on-site vault will be located in the southeast corner of the property. It will be designed for Level II flow control and basic water quality (1998 Surface Water Design Manual). 3. Other Design Features: The proposal includes a 3,173 square foot recreation tract located southeast of the site. This tract will be improved with landscaping and a toy structure for the benefit of the subdivision's future residents. Report and Decision L04S0065 •• G. PUBLIC SERVICES 1. Sewage Disposal: The applicant proposes to serve the subject subdivision by means of a public sewer system managed by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. A Certificate of Sewer Availability, dated December 2004 indicates this sewer district's capability to serve the proposed development. 2. Water Supply: The applicant proposes to serve the subject subdivision with a public water supply and distribution system managed by the Soos Creek Water and sewer District. A Certificate of Water Availability dated December 17, 2004 indicates this water district's capability to serve the proposed development. 3. School facilities: The subject subdivision will be served by Benson Elementary, Nelson Middle, and Lindberg Senior High Schools, all located within the Renton School District. 4. School Access: The District has indicated that the future students from this subdivision will walk to Benson Elementary and the middle and high school students will be bussed at the intersections of 1201h Avenue SE and SE 1881 h Street and at the intersection of SE 1881h and 1161h Avenue SE respectively. Current/X, there are no sidewalks along 120th Avenue SE to its intersection with SE 188 Street. Sidewalk improvements are expected along SE 188th Street by other subdivision proposals in the area. 5. Parks and Recreation Space: The nearest public park is Soos Creek Park located along SE 192"d Street a few miles southeast of the site. KCC 21 A.14 requires subdivisions in the UR and R zone classifications to either provide on- site recreation space or pay a fee to the Parks Division for establishment and maintenance of neighborhood parks. At this time, the applicant is proposing to . provide a 3,100 square-foot recreation tract on the site. The site of the recreation tract is encumbered by the Soos Creek utility easement. The Soos Creek Water and Sewer District has agreed to reduce the easement to 10-foot wide for water main. The District has no objection to development of a recreation tract on the easement provided no toy structure is anchored within the easement, see attachment i. KCC 21A.14.190 requires subdivisions to provide tot/children play areas within the recreation space on-site. The proposal must include a 270-square-foot play area with the required recreation tract. The recreation tract plan must be reviewed and approved by the Soos Creek Utility District. G. SEPA THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21C, the responsible official of the LUSD issued a mitigated threshold determination of non-significance (MONS) for the proposed development on March 24, 2006. This determination was based on the review of the environmental checklist and supporting documentation filed with the application, resulting in the conclusion that the proposal would not cause probable significant adverse impacts on the environment provided the following measures are attached to the project as conditions: In accordance with the requirements with RCW 58.17.110 (2), the Applicant shall improve 120th Avenue SE, from the plat entrance in the 19000 block northward to the intersection of SE 188th Street/120th Avenue SE by providing a paved walkway along the easterly side of 120th Avenue SE. The walkway, per Section 3.09 of the KCRS shall be selected and designed by the Applicant's engineer in accordance with any one of the following standards, and upon approval by DOES, constructed. A. A full width (8 feet) paved shoulder B. A paved shoulder of no less than four (4) feet in width, separated by vehicle traffic by either an extruded curb or an unpaved gravel shoulder strip Report and Decision L04S0065 C. A concrete curb and gutter, and sidewalk section H. FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS: The subject subdivision will comply with the goals and objectives of the King County Comprehensive Plan and will comply with the requirements of the Subdivision and Zoning Codes and other official land use controls of King County (e.g. 1993 King County Road Standards, 1998 Surface Water Design Manual, etc.), based upon the conditions for final short plat approval. DECISION: The proposed Short Plat received January 9, 2006 (Attachment 1) is granted preliminary approval subject to the following conditions of final approval: 1. The proposal shall comply with all platting provisions of King County Title 19A. 2. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final short subdivision. 3. All utilities within proposed rights-of-way must be included within a franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final short plat recording 4. Drainage: 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) (KCC 9) The proposed short plat qualifies for full drainage review as outlined in Chapter One of the SWDM. Final short plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. A professional civil engineer licensed in the State of Washington shall prepare drainage plans and a technical information report as outlined in Chapter 2 of the drainage manual. The drainage plan submittal shall demonstrate compliance with all applicable Core and Special Requirements. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved short plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval, which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. A. Engineering plans and analysis shall comply with the SWDM. Prior to short plat recording, the applicant shall submit engineering plans to address the required short plat improvements. King County approval of drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. Permit fees for review and inspection shall be paid as required by County codes and policies. Bonding for the drainage plans will also be established as determined by ODES prior to plan approval. After receiving drainage plan approval, the applicant shall contact the DOES Land Use Inspection Section to schedule a pre-construction meeting prior to performing work on the site. B. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by DOES Engineering Review shall be shown on the engineering plans. C. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: Report and Decision "All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings# on file with DOES and/or the Department of Transportation. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots L04S0065 designated for perforated stubouts, dispersion, or infiltration systems, the designs shall be constructed at the time of the building permit and shall comply with the plans on file." SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: The conceptual drainage plan for this short plat proposes to discharge surface water run-off into a future piping system. The future piped conveyance would be constructed and located on the adjacent property to the east under a proposed subdivision application (L04P0002). Prior to engineering plan approval, the applicant shall provide proof that assures the offsite conveyance will be constructed and located in easements where appropriate. D. Should the proposed offsite conveyance not be available at engineering review, and prior to plan approval the applicant shall submit a revision to this application with a new conceptual drainage plan. Since this will require a substantial change this project may be re-vest to the current SWDM (20.20.080 KKC). 5. 1993 King County Road Standards (KCRS) (KCC 14)-Final short plat approval shall require full compliance with the provisions set forth in the King County Road Standards (KCRS), including engineering plans for all road and site improvements. The engineering plans shall be prepared by a professional civil engineer licensed in the state of Washington. DOES strongly recommends that the engineering plans be submitted at least two years prior to the expiration date of the project. · All construction and upgrading of public and private roads within this short plat shall comply with the following requirements unless otherwise approved by ODES (KCRS Section1 .03). A. B. C, 0. fZ'. The proposed road and cul-de sac serving the property shall be constructed to urban minor access street standard per KCRS, Section 2.03. It shall extend from 1201 h Avenue SE and continue into the site terminating into a cul-de-sac bulb as shown on the site plan per KCRS Section 2.08. $~c. IN$€f4.i rtion of the road im rovements a re ain in the existing easement: e on-site improvements s all be p aced in a trac . he tract sha e ail undivided ownership to the lots it serves, and the lot wners shall be responsible for its maintenance. The proposed road improvements shall address the requirements for road surfacing outlined in KCRS Chapter 4. As noted in section 4.01 F, full width pavement overlay is required where widening existing asphalt. Modifications to the above road conditions may be considered by King County pursuant to the variance procedures in KCRS 1.08. The following notes shall be shown on the final recorded short subdivision: (1) All private easements and/or tracts to be maintained, repaired, and/or rebuilt by the owners of the parcels having legal access there from and their heirs, assigns or successors, unless and until such roads are improved to King County standards and are dedicated and accepted by King County for maintenance. (2) All restrictions, easements, tracts, and their purpose shall be shown on the final recorded short subdivision. 6. Health (KCC 13)-This project is exempt from further King County Heath Department review. However, if improvements are required from the Sewer and/or the Water Report and Decision L04S0065 District, then verification shall be required from said District(s) that the improvements have been bonded and/or installed, prior to final recording of the short plat. 7. Building and Construction Standards (Title 16) A. The applicant shall comply with all applicable provisions of KCC 16.82. B. The applicant shall demonstrate compliance with KCC 16.82.180 C (open space) requirements at engineering and final short plat. 8. Fire Code (KCC 17) -Section 902 of the 1997 Edition of Uniform Fire Code The applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main and fire flow standards of Chapter 17.08 of the King County Code prior to the final short plat approval. 9. Density and Dimensions (KCC 21A.12) All lots shall meet the density and dimensions requirements of the R-6 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary short subdivision, whichever is larger. Minor revisions to the short subdivision, which do not result in substantial changes and/or do not create additional lots may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services. 10 Street Trees (KCC 21 A.16) -Street trees shall be provided as follows (per KCRS 5.03 and KCC 21 A.16.050): A. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. B. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. C. If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of~way line. D. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the County has adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. E. The species of trees shall be approved by DOES if located within the right-of-way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. F. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by ODES prior to engineering plan approval. G. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DOES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. Report and Decision L04S0065 11. Sensitive Areas (KCC 21A.24)-The small size Class Ill wetland located near the northeast property line is exempt from the Sensitive area requirements. 12. Road Mitigation Payment System -The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with Road Mitigation Payment System (MPS), King County Code 14.75, by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by King County Department of Transportation. The applicant has an option to either: A. Pay the MPS fee at final short plat recording. If this option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of short plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the short plat that reads, "All fees required by King County code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS) have been paid." Or B. Pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If this option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of the building permit application. 13. As shown on the site plan, a recreation tract shall be provided consistent with the requirements of KCC 21A.14.180 and KCC 21A.14.190 (i.e., sport court[s), children's play equipment, picnic table[s], benches, etc.). A detailed recreation space plan (i.e., landscape specs, equipment specs, etc.) consistent with KC 21 A.16 shall be submitted for review and approval by ODES and King County Parks prior to submittal of the final plat documents or concurrent with the Engineering Review phase. The recreation plan must show only a 10-foot wide easement within the tract as agreed by the Soos Creek Utility District. No toy structure shall be placed within the 10-foot wide utility easement. The recreation tract shall be fully fenced. A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording of the plat. 14. A homeowner's association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction of DOES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the recreation tract. 15. To implement KCC 21A.38.230 which applies to the site, a detailed tree retention plan shall be submitted with the engineering plans for the subject plat. The tree retention plan and the engineering plans shall be consistent with the requirements of KCC 21A.38.230, as well as the conceptual tree retention plan which is part of the hearing record for this project. No clearing of the subject property is permitted until the final tree retention plan is approved by LUSD. Flagging and temporary fencing of trees to be retained shall be provided, consistent with KCC 21A.38.230B4. The placement of impervious surfaces, fill material, excavation work, or the storage of construction materials is prohibited within the fenced areas around preserved trees, except for grading work permitted pursuant to KCC 21A.38.230B4d(2). A note shall be placed on the final plat indicating that the trees shown to be retained on the tree retention plan shall be maintained by the future owners of the proposed lots, consistent with KCC 21A.38.230B6. Please Note that the tree retention plan shall be included as part of the final engineering plans for the subject plat. 16. The following has been established under SEPA: In accordance with the requirements with RCW 58.17 .110 (2), the Applicant shall improve 120th Avenue SE, from the plat entrance in the 19000 block northward to the intersection of SE 188th Street/120th Avenue SE by providing a paved walkway along the eastward side of 120th Avenue SE. The walkway, per Section 3.09 of the KCRS, shall be selected and designed by the Applicant's engineer in accordance with any one of the following standards, and upon approval by DOES, constructed. A. A full width (8 feet) paved shoulder B. A paved shoulder of no less than four (4) feet in width, separated by vehicle traffic by either an extruded curb or an unpaved gravel shoulder strip Report and Decision L04S0065 C. A concrete curb and gutter, and sidewalk section Other Considerations A. Preliminary approval of this application does not limit the applicant's responsibility to obtain any required permit or license from the State or other regulatory body. This may include, but not be limited to, obtaining a forest practice permit, an HPA permit, building permits, and other types of entitlements as necessitated by circumstances. B. The short subdivision shall conform to KCC 16.82 relating to grading on private property. C. Development of the subject property may require registration with the Washington State Department of Licensing, Real Estate Division Appeal Information and Parties of Record Report and Decision L04S006S RIGHT TO APPEAL This action may be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner, with a fee of $250 (check payable to King County Office of Finance). As required by KCC 20.20.090 and 20.24.090, the appeal period shall be twenty one (21) calendar days and shall commence on the third day after the notice of decision is mailed. Filing an appeal requires actual delivery to the King County Land Use Services Division prior to the close of business (4:30 p.m.) on April 24, 2006. Prior mailing is not sufficient if actual receipt by the Division does not occur within the applicable time period. The Examiner does not have authority to extend the time period unless the Division is not open on the specified closing date, in which event delivery prior to the close of business on the next business day is sufficient to meet the filing requirement. If a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall file a statement of appeal within a 21-day calendar period commencing three days after the notice of decision is mailed. The statement of appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including file number) and the alleged errors in that decision. The statement of appeal shall state: 1) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the statement of appeal. Failure to timely file a notice of appeal, appeal fee, or statement of appeal deprives the Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Appeals must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services, addressed as follows: LAND USE APPEAL Land Use Services Division Department of Development and Environmental Services BlackRiver Corporate Park 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Any party may make a request for a pre-hearing conference. For more information regarding appeal proceedings and pre-hearing conferences, please contact the Office of the Examiner for a Citizens' Guide to the Examiner Hearings and/or read KCC 20.20 and 20.24. Parties and Persons of Interest: Report and Decision L04S0065 Foster, Curt From: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Sent: To: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 11 :47 AM Foster, Curt Subject: FW: L04S0065, Yee Short Plat Curt: The following is the off-site walkway improvement requirements. Would this require additional drainage requirements or your conditions will cover this? Fereshteh From: Sent: To: Subject: Langley, Kristen Tuesday, March 21, 2006 11:44 AM Dehkordi, Fereshteh L0450065 In accordance with the requirements with RCW 58.17.110 (2), the Applicant shall improve 12oth Avenue SE, from the plat entrance in the 19000 block northerly to the intersection of SE 188th Street/120th Avenue SE to provide a paved walk~ay along the easterly side of 120th Avenue SE. The walkway, per Section 3.09 of the KCRS shall be selected and designed by the Applicant's engineer in accordance with any one of the following standards, and upon approval by DDES, -COi :cl: acted. • A full width (8 feet) paved shoulder • A paved shoulder of no less than four (4) feet in width, separated by vehicle traffic by either an extruded curb or an unpaved gravel shoulder strip • A concrete curb and gutter, and sidewalk section 1 ·• King County Department of Development Envlormantal Services Detailed Time Report by lndivdual L04S0065 PRE-SP Name Date Employee type fn task hours note Ballweber, James 01/25/2005 LSDSJBAL RH GA 51 Field Check Yee short plat field-check w/JPED Summary For LSDSJBAL L04S0065 1.00 Hours Total Bergam, Mark 01/17/2006 BERGAMM RH ER 1 O Case/Plan Review 0.25 Yee SP -CFOS vault layout ventilation openings not in travel way Summary For BERGAMM L04S0065 0.25 Hours Total Cheshier, Beth 03/02/2005 CHESHIERB RH ER 51 Field Check 1.75 FIELD CHECK 03/07/2005 CHESHIERB RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review 3.75 report, copies etc ... Summary For CHESHIERB L04S0065 5.50 Hours Total Dehkordl-Westerlund, Feres 01/13/2005 DEHKORDIF RH PR 10 Case/Plan Review 2 review, research. pred NOA & ltr, routing 02/11/2005 DEHKORDIF RH PR 80 Public Contact 0.75 responded to Pl by neighbors 02/25/2005 DEHKORDIF RH PR 10 Case/Plan Review 0.5 review & coordination 03/03/2005 DEHKORDIF RH PR 51 Field Check 2 field 03/11/2005 DEHKORDIF RH PR 92 Correspondence 3 review issue, discussion, research, draft screening ltr 03/15/2005 DEHKORDIF RH PR 10 Case/Plan Review 0.5 finalized screening ltr. 04/01/2005 DEHKORDIF RH PR 10 Case/Plan Review 0.5 05/26/2005 DEHKORDIF RH PR 92 Correspondence 0.5 extension ltr, update record. 07/28/2005 DEHKORDIF RH PR 10 Case/Plan Review 0.5 review & coordination 07/29/2005 DEHKORDIF RH PR 10 Case/Plan Review 2 review supplemental material, route, schedule screening mtg 08/16/2005 DEHKORDIF RH PR 94 Meetings screening mtg 08/17/2005 DEHKORDIF RH PR 92 Correspondence 1.25 coorination, drafting a screening ltr 08/19/2005 DEHKORDIF RH PR 10 Case/Plan Review 1.25 review & coordination 08/25/2005 DEHKORDIF RH PR 10 Case/Plan Review 0.5 review & coordination with applicant consultant 08/26/2005 DEHKORDIF RH PR 92 Correspondence 1.25 finalized letter 8/22/05 08/30/2005 DEHKORDIF RH PR 10 Case/Plan Review 0.75 Review & coordination 09/02/2005 DEHKORDIF RH PR 10 Case/Plan Review 0.5 coo~dination of review re additional engineering cond 8/29/05 09/13/2005 DEHKORDIF RH PR 80 Public Contact 0.5 responded to inq 11/08/2005 DEHKORDIF RH PR 10 Case/Plan Review 0.4 updated file email to De En lang 11/15/2005 DEHKORDIF RH PR 10 Case/Plan Review 0.5 01/04/2006 DEHKORDIF RH PR 92 Correspondence 0.4 eextende deadline letter. 01/17/2006 DEHKORDIF RH PR 94 Meetings 1.5 review, preparation attending screening meeting with Curt Foster 01/18/2006 DEHKORDIF RH PR 92 Correspondence completed draft of 3rd screening ltr. 01/19/2006 DEHKORDIF RH PR 10 Case/Plan Review 0.5 coordination of review Tuesday, March 21, 2006 Page I of4 L04S0065 PRE-SP -"""'"""""'""""'"'"""'"' Name Date Employee type fn task hours note 03/02/2006 DEHKORDIF RH PR 10 Case/Plan Review 0.5 recieved and reviewed revision, routing & scheduling 0310712006 DEHKORDIF RH PR 10 Case/Plan Review 0.5 review & coordination 03/0912006 DEHKORDIF RH PR 94 Meetings 0.75 screening meeting & discussion of remaining issues 0311512006 DEHKORDIF RH PR 96 Report Preparation 2 strat draft of rept. Summary For DEHKORDIF L04S0065 27.30 Hours Total Eichhorn, Paul 02104/2005 EICHHORNP RH FF 12 0.75 6-LOT Summary For EICHHORNP L04S0065 0.75 Hours Total Engell, Bruce 0210812005 ENGELLB RH GA 16 1.25 Sig Tree Plat Review 02/1012005 ENGELLB RH GA 16 Review and consultation with Feresteh 02/11/2005 ENGELLB RH GA 16 1.5 Review sig tree/commenUreq for revised plan Summary For ENGELLB L04S0065 3.75 Hours Total Foster, Curtis 0112112005 FOSTERC RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review Setup file, cements and PRMS. 02/08/2005 FOSTERC RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review 2 Prep for staff meeting + meeting 02/1612005 FOSTERC RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review 0.5 Neighbor complaint. 03/04/2005 FOSTERC RH PM 32 PM-Fee Estimating 5 Field trip~.Road and drianage issues. 0310712005 FOSTERC OT PM 32 PM-Fee Estimating 3 Photos and comments and setup file. 0310812005 FOSTERC RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review 3.25 Conversation with Nick Gillen + file comments and hold issues. 0310912005 FOSTERC RH PM 10 Case/Plan Review 5.75 Hold issues to Fereshteh. 03/1012005 FOSTERC RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review 3 Hold issues. 0311112005 FOSTERC RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review Coordination with Fereshteh and draft revision. 0312212005 FOSTERC RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review 0.5 Neighbor complaints, recd hold letter, file comments. 04101/2005 FOSTERC RH PM 10 Case/Plan Review 0.25 E-mail-Easement issue. 07/1212005 FOSTERC RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review 0.5 Status, file comments. 08/06/2005 FOSTERC OT ER 10 Case/Plan Review 2.25 Submittal review+ file comments and mtg prep. 0811612005 FOSTERC OT ER 10 Case/Plan Review Prep and staff meeting w/Fdeh and Psim + emailed revised issues list. 08116/2005 FOSTERC RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review 1.5 Prep and staff meeting w/Fdeh and Psim + emailed revised issues list. 08/2212005 FOSTERC OT ER 10 Case/Plan Review 2.5 Screening letter review. 0812612005 FOSTERC RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review 6.5 Hid letter, mtg with Bruce (discharge location) addendum letter+ ph/email. 08/30/2005 FOSTERC RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review E-mail from De-En/Fanny and file comments and responce. 0911512005 FOSTERC RH PM 10 Case/Plan Review 0.25 Project management, status tracking, and project list. 10/2012005 FOSTERC RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review 0.25 Phone call (no name): status-De-En out of town. 0110312006 FOSTERC OT ER 10 Case/Plan Review 0.25 E-mail from De-en requesting extension, print and file comments. Tuesday, March 11, 1006 Pagelo/4 .. L04S0065 PRE-SP ___ ,,, __ ,,,_,,,,,,,,""'""'''"'"'--''''"""'----·--·--------------------Name Date Employee type fn task 01/05/2006 FOSTERC RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review 01/11/2006 FOSTERC RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review 01/12/2006 FOSTERC RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review 01/17/2006 FOSTERC OT ER 10 Case/Plan Review 01/18/2006 FOSTERC RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review 03/02/2006 FOSTERC RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review 03/09/2006 FOSTERC RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review 03/13/2006 FOSTERC OT ER 10 Case/Plan Review 03/14/2006 FOSTERC RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review 03/15/2006 FOSTERC RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review 03/15/2006 FOSTERC OT ER 10 Case/Plan Review 03/16/2006 FOSTERC RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review 03/16/2006 FOSTERC OT ER 10 Case/Plan Review 03/17/2006 FOSTERC OT ER 10 Case/Plan Review 03/17/2006 FOSTERC RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review Summary For FOSTERC L04S0065 Hudson, Richard 12/28/2004 PLANRHUD RH PR 31 Project Coordination Summary For PLANRHUD L04S0065 Pederson, Jon 01/25/2005 PEDERSONJ 02/08/2005 PEDERSONJ RH GA 51 Field Check RH GA 31 Project Coordination Summary For PEDERSONJ L04S0065 Sanders, James 03/01/2005 SANDERSJ 03/09/2006 SANDERSJ RH PM 32 PM-Fee Estimating RH ER 94 Meetings Summary For SANDERSJ L04S0065 Simmons, Patrick 02/15/2005 SIMMONSP 02/17/2005 SIMMONSP 04/01/2005 SIMMONSP RH FR 10 Case/Plan Review RH FR 1 O Case/Plan Review RH FR 1 O Case/Plan Review Summary For SIMMONSP L04S0065 Tibbits, Chad 12/27/2004 PINTCTIB RH CS 31 Permit Application Intake Summary For PINTCTIB L04S0065 Whittaker, Bruce Tuesday, March 21, 2006 hours note 0.25 Phone (Robert Britton ?) Status and deadline extension questions + file comments 1.5 E-mail exchanges and submittal. 5.5 Recd submittal, downslope issues/conflicts, mtg w/Bruce W, drainage easement. 8.25 Screening letter, Mtgs w/1)Fdeh and 2) Kris L 3.75 Revised Fdeh screening letter. 0. 75 Submittal review and mtg schedule. 6.5 Submittal review and mtgs w/ 1) Bruce and 2) Fereshteh and 3) Jlm + Bruce. 1.5 PA issues. 2.5 Staff mtg, draft PA issues. 7.25 Draft PA issues. Draft PA issues. 5 PA issues and draft, meeting with Jim and corrections. PA issues and draft, meeting with Jim and corrections. PA draft, corrections, PRMS and e-mail. 6 PA issues and draft, and corrections(meeting with Jim). 93.00 Hours Total 0.5 reviewed file and assigned to planner/engineer, updated computer. 0.50 Hours Total 1.5 Yee Short Plat w/ Ballweber Yee Short Plat 2.50 Hours Total 0.2 BudgeUposting for KCLA 0.25 Met w/ CFOS on access design issues/conditions 0.45 Hours Total 0.75 prelim 0.25 LETTER 0.5 access easement 1.50 Hours Total 1. 75 intake set up routing file for short plat 1.75 Hours Total Page 3 of 4 • L04S0065 PRE-SP Name Date Employee type fn task 03/09/2006 WHITIAKERB RH ER 10 Case/Plan Review Summary For WHITIAKERB L04S0065 Tuesday, March 21, 2006 Summary For L04S0065 Average Hours /,ours note 0.5 in house meeting on drainage:connection to Fleuve Des Voiles 0.50 Hours Total 138. 75 Hours Total 1.69 Page 4 of 4 • F. SHORT SUBDIVISION File No. L04S0065 DESIGN FEATURES 2. Access/Roadway Section: The proposal obtains access off 20th Avenue SE by means of a private easement. The road serving this short plat will be improved to the urban minor access street standard. It will terminate at a cul-de-sac bulb located near the center of the property. 3. Drainage: Currently drainage from the property leaves the site in the form of sheet flow. After development storm water runoff (from the proposed under ground vault) will be conveyed easterly (same direction) to a proposed development on the neighboring property. The on-site vault will be located in the southeast property corner. It will be designed for Level II flow control and basic water quality (1998 Surface Water Design Manual). DECISION: 2. Access Requirements 1993 King County Road Standards (KCRS) (KCC 14) Final short plat approval shall require full compliance with the provisions set forth in the King County Road Standards (KCRS), including engineering plans for all road and site improvements. The engineering plans shall be prepared by a professional civil engineer licensed in the state of Washington. DOES strongly recommends that the engineering plans be submitted at least two years prior to the expiration date of the project. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads within this short plat shall comply with the following requirements unless otherwise approved by ODES (KCRS Section1 .03). a. The road serving the property shall be designed as an urban minor access street (Section 2.03). It shall extend from 20th Avenue SE to the cul-de-sac (CDS) bulb located at its eastern terminus (Section 2.07). b. A permanent CDS bulb shall be improved as shown on the revised site plan (KCRS Section 2.08). c. The off-site portion of the road improvements may remain in the existing easement. However, the on-site improvements shall be place in a tract. The tract shall be an undivided ownership to the lots it serves, and the lot owners shall be responsible for its maintenance. d. The proposed road improvements shall address the requirements for road surfacing outlined in KCRS Chapter 4. As noted in section 4.01 F, full width pavement overlay is required where widening existing asphalt. e. Modifications to the above road conditions may be considered by King County pursuant to the variance procedures in KCRS 1.08. m. The following notes shall be shown on the final recorded short subdivision: (1) All private easements and/or tracts to be maintained, repaired, and/or rebuilt by the owners of the parcels having legal access there from and their heirs, assigns or successors, unless and until such roads are improved to King County standards and are dedicated and accepted by King County for maintenance. Report and Decision L04S0057 & L04S0058 (2) All restrictions, easements, tracts, and their purpose shall be shown on the final recorded short subdivision. 3. Surface Water Management and Control 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) (KCC 9) The proposed short plat qualifies for full drainage review as outlined in chapter one of the SWDM, Final short plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. A professional civil engineer licensed in the State of Washington shall prepare drainage plans and a technical information report as outlined in Chapter 2 of the drainage manual. The drainage plan submittal shall demonstrate compliance with all applicable Core and Special Requirements. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved short plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval, which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. a. Engineering plans and analysis shall comply with the SWDM. Prior to short plat recording, the applicant shall submit engineering plans to address the required short plat improvements. King County approval of drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. Permit fees for review and inspection shall be paid as required by County codes and policies. Bonding for the drainage plans will also be established as determined by DOES prior to plan approval. After receiving drainage plan approval, the applicant shall contact the ODES Land Use Inspection Section to schedule a pre-construction meeting prior to performing work on the site. b. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by ODES Engineering Review shall be shown on the engineering plans. c. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: "All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains· from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings # on file with DOES and/or the Department of Transportation. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots designated for perforated stubouts, dispersion, or infiltration systems, the designs shall be constructed at the time of the building permit and shall comply with the plans on file." SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: The conceptual drainage plan for this short plat proposes to discharge surface water run-off into a future piping system. The future piped conveyance would be constructed and located on the adjacent property to the east under a proposed subdivision application (L04P0002). Prior to engineering plan approval, the applicant shall provide proof that assures the offsite conveyance will be constructed and located in easements where appropriate. Should the proposed offsite conveyance not be available at engineering review, and prior to plan approval the applicant shall submit a revision to this application with a new conceptual drainage plan. Since this will require a substantial change this project may be re-vest to the current SWDM (20.20.080 KKC). Report and Decision L04S0057&L04S0058 ~ Lang Associates, Inc. Land Use and Development consultants 10658 Riviera Place N.E. •Seattle• Washington• 98125 • Tel: (206) 306-8880 • Fax: (206) 362-6848 February 28, 2006 iE ([; J_; n r..;; F_t ~\ Le, LJ ~ [ ... /. I Ms. Fereshteh Oehkordi, Senior Planner King County DDES-LUSD MAR O 1 200G i 1 }/ KC. D.D.E.S. 900 Oaksdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055 Re: Yee Short Plat-Responses to 1/19/06 Notice of Request for Additional Information King County File No. LD4S0065 Dear Fereshteh: Hope you had a wonderful holiday and looking forward to an even better new year. We are writing in response to your Notice of Request for Additional Information dated January 19, 2006 regarding the Subject Project. Our responses are enumerated similar to your original letter and are in bold. Original County comments appear in Italics. A .. Road 1 .. 2. \_/ It appears as depicted on the revised site plan that the sidewalk and grading associated with the construction of the new road at the intersection of the entrance road with 120th A venue SE, extends beyond the perimeter of the existing road easement. Please provide a letter of intent from the neighbor, tax lot # 6199000125 to allow for additional easement for construction of the road. This letter must be provided prior to the preliminary approval. The actual easement must be recorded prior to the engineering plan approval. The subject intersection has been reconfigured to show all of the new Improvements within the existing right-of-way or easement As shown the proposed private road accessing the short subdivision does not meet KCRS Section 2,07. The road must contain a vertical curb along its south edge per KCRS Drawing #1-010. Please revise the site plan to show this. ,- The proposed road cross section has been revised to meet KCRS. The proposed project is within the designated "urban" area. The proposed thickened edge and asphalt shoulder is not permitted for the on-site road per the KCRS, Section 2.03 in urban areas unless a variance from the standard is obtained. The proposed road cross section has been revised to meet KCRS. The private road as proposed is acceptable however an agreement to use the cu/.<:Je.sac bulb by the neighboring property (Tfl)( Lot # 6199000125) will be required. A note to this effect will be recorded on the face of the short plat. Comment acknowledged.· B. Drainage 1. The ventilation grates for the underground RID vault cannot be located in the roadway per KCSWDM, Section 5. 3. 3. 1. Please revise the RID design to show the grates outside the travel lane. r,; ' Ms. Dehkordi February 28, 2006 Page 2 of3 The RID vault has been reconfigured and the ventilation grates are no long in the roadway. 2. A 3 to 1 length to width ratio is required for the RID facility. Please demonstrate / how this is accomplished. The RID vault has been reconfigured to meet the 3 to 1 ratio requiremenl 3. The Level 1 (last page) shows a pipe extending easterly from the RID facility to the street drainage system within the plat of Flevue Des Voiles, KC File L04P0002. This conflicts with the engineering v-plans for the plat. A conceptual drainage plan is required demonstrating how the two drainage systems will connec!t. Please coordinate this with the proponent of Flevue Des Voiles. We have contacted the applicant of Flevue Des Voiles and determine that they are changing their plan to show drainage connection to Yee Short Plat per easement agreemenl 4. The proposed short plat depends on the completion of Flevue Des Voiles plat for drainage discharge. The proposed drainage facility along with the discharge pipe crossing the tax parcel to the east must be completed in the event Flevue Des Voiles plat fails. A letter of intent from the tax parcel (6199000220) directly east of the site must be provided to allow construction of the discharge pipe. Letters of Intent along with a Mutual Easement Agreement were previously submitted to the County. The agreement has provisions for the construction of the discharge pipe. In the event Flevue Des Voiles falls (which is unlikely), alternative drainage systems acceptableio the County would be proposed. If no acceptable alternative is available, it would not be financially fe~ible for a 6 lot short plat to construct the entire drainage discharge system, then the short plat would not be constructed. Further more property ownership of Flevue Des Voiles is in the process of changing hands. The new owner, who has been working with us during the entire short plat process, has agreed to sign any necessary document when the transaction Is completed. C. Recreation Plan D. The conceptual recreation plan does not show the location of water main easement. Please be advised that no anchored or permanent structure can be placed within the water easement without approval from the Water District. A detailed recreation and landscaping plan will be required during engineering review plan. This will be a condition of approval. Comment acknowledged. Tree Replacement Please remove the proposed tree replacements from the site plan. A separete tree replacement plan will be required for roview and approval during the Engineering Review phase. The tree replacement plan must be propared showing tree species and other details and must be submitted along the road and drainage plans. This will be a condition of preliminary approval. Comment acknowledged. Other comments 1. Four copies of a conceptual drainage plan showing the items discussed above. This plan must be prepared, stamped, and signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Washington. Four copies of the revised conceptual drainage plan are enclosed. ., Ms. Dehkordi February 28, 2006 Page3 of3 2. Letters of intent from tax parcels 61990Q0125 and 6199000220 as discussed above. Please see responses to Item B4. 3. Four copies of a revised site plan to match the revised conceptual drainage plan. Revision to the Conceptual Drainage Plan did not require changes to the site plan. 4. Two copies of a reduced site plan 8 1/2 by 14. Revision to the Conceptual Drainage Plan did not require changes to the site plan. If you need the reductions of the previously submitted site plan please let me know. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact me at (206) 306- 8880 or email me at deenlang@yahoo.com. De-n Lang President Enclosure Cc Fanny Yee Todd Popelka Mike Luna ' ,I ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 January 19, 2006 De-En Lang Lang Associates Inc. I 0658 Riviera Place NE Seattle, WA 98125 RE: Yee Short Plat, KC File L04S0065 Dear Mr. Lang: Thank you for the submittal of additional information on January 9, 2006. We have reviewed the supplemental information and have the following comments: A. Road 1. It appears as depicted on the revised site plan that the sidewalk and grading associated with the construction of the new road at the intersection of the entrance road with 120 1h Avenue SE, extends beyond the perimeter of the existing road easement. Please provide a letter of intent from the neighbor, tax lot# 6199000125 to allow for additional easement for construction of the road. This letter must be provided prior to the preliminary approval. The actual easement must be recorded prior to the engineering plan approval. 2. As shown The proposed private road accessing the short subdivision does not meet KCRS Section 2,07. The road must contain a vertical curb along its south edge per KCRS Drawing #1-010. Please revise the site plan to show this. 3. The proposed project is within the designated "urban" area. The proposed thickened edge and asphalt shoulder is not permitted for the on-site road per tl_ie KCRS, Section 2.03 in urban areas unless a variance from the standard is obtained. 4 The private road as proposed is acceptable however an agreement to use the cul-de-sac bulb by the neighboring property (Tax Lot# 6199000125) will be required. A note to this effect will be recorded on the face of the short plat. B. Drainage 1. The ventilation grates for the underground RID vault cannot be located in the roadway per KCSWDM, Section 5.3.3.1. Please revise the RID design to show the grates outside the travel lane. 2. A 3 to I length to width ratio is required for the RID facility. Please demonstrate how this is accomplished. 3. The Level I (last page) shows a pipe extending easterly from the RID facility to the street drainage system within the plat ofFlevue Des Voiles, KC File L04P0002. This conflicts with the engineering plans for the plat. A conceptual drainage plan is required demonstrating how the two drainage systems will connect. Please coordinate this with the proponent of Flevue Des Voiles. 4. The proposed short plat depends on the completion ofFlevue Des Voiles plat for drainage discharge. The proposed drainage facility along with the discharge pipe crossing the tax parcel to the east must be completed in the event Flevue Des Voiles plat fails. A letter of intent from the tax parcel (6199000220) directly east of the site must be provided to allow construction of the discharge pipe. If you have any questions regarding the road and drainage standards, please contact Curt Foster at (206) 296-7106. C. Recreation Plan The conceptual recreation plan does not show the location of water main easement. Please be advised that no anchored or permanent structure can be placed within the water easement without approval from the Water District. A detailed recreation and landscaping plan will be required during engineering review plan. This will be a condition of approval. D. Tree Replacement Please remove the proposed tree replacements from the site plan. A separate tree replacement . plan will be required for review and approval during the Engineering Review phase. The tree replacement plan must be prepared showing tree species and other details and must be submitted along the road and drainage plans. This will be a condition of preliminary approval. Please submit the following by March 20, 2006: I. Four copies of a conceptual drainage plan showing the items discussed above. This plan must be prepared, stamped, and signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Washington. 2. Letters of intent from tax parcels 6199000125 and 6199000220 as discussed above. 3. Four copies of a revised site plan to match the revised conceptual drainage plan. " ' I 4. Two copies of a reduced site plan 8 Y2 by 14. If you have any questions regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project/Program Manager Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division cc: Fanny & Philip Yee Curt Foster, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, Land Use Services Division Application File ® Dept. of Development and Enviromnental Services · Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 ~ ;;t: P-r1 E:'M- l-17 -fo Cor:rected or Additional ,Information or Studies List Application No: L04S0065 Filed on: --------- Please provide the following information. Please submit the same number of revised documents as the number of copies required with your initial application, and a minimum of 3 copies of each special study. B. Access and Traffic, 1993 King County Road Standards (KCRS): 1. The off-site sidewalk and grading appears to extend beyond the 30-foot wide easement. A letter of intent (from the neighbor, tax lot # 6199000125) is required with the next submittal indicating a willingness to provide additional easement prior to final recording. 2. A vertical curb is required along the south side of the off-site road to accommodate the ultimate 22-foot wide urban road section (KCRS Section 2.07). 3. Thickened edge and asphalt shoulder is not permitted on-site (urban area) unless variance approval is obtained (KCRS Section 2.03). A revised plan or an approved variance is required with the next submittal. 4 A private road is permitted with the agreement for the use of the CDS bulb by the neighboring property (Tax Lot# 6199000125) prior to final recording. No action is required at this time. C. Drainage, King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM): 1. The submittal proposes an RID vault located under the cul-de-sac (CDS) bulb. The ventilation grates cannot be located in the roadway (Section 5.3.3.1). Please revise the facility with the grates located outside the travel lane. 2. A 3 to 1 length to width ratio is required for the RID facility. Please demonstrate how this is accomplished. 3. The Level I (last page) shows a pipe extending easterly from the RID facility to the street drainage system within the plat of Flevue Des Voiles (L04P0002). This conflicts with the engineering plans for the plat. A conceptual drainage plan is required demonstrating how the two drainage systems connect 4. Conceptual Drainage Plan: Submit 3 copies of a conceptual drainage plan, which is prepared, stamped, and signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Washington. 5. The letter of intent included in the preliminary TIR did not address a plat failure situation. A revised letter of intent is required with the next submittal reflecting the situation where the short plat stands alone and is required convey drainage to an acceptable discharge location. D. Revised Site Plan: 1. Drainage Improvements. Provide 3 copies of a revised site plan that addresses the drainage standards as discussed in the above section. Redesign the site plan as necessary to comply with the 1993 KCRS and the 1998 SWDM. F96\sprs\InfoStdy. Lst 2/10/98 clc Page I / • r lang Associates, Inc. Land Use and Development consultants 10658 Riviera Place N.E. •Seattle• Washington• 98125 • Tel: (206) 306-8880 • Fax: (206) 362-6848 January 5, 2006 Ms. Fereshteh Dehkordi, Senior Planner King County DDES-LUSD L04S0065 900 Oaksdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055 Re: Yee Short Plat-Responses to 8/23/05 Notice of Request for Additional Information King County File No. L04S0065 /0) & @ & ll [V7 rs ~ Ln) u LSI DJ Dear Fereshteh: · JAN D. 9 ,::; D Hope you had a wonderful holiday and looking forward to an even better new yt'(~ ."'4ft i=lffl::w.r:iling in response to your Notice of Request for Additional Information dated August 23, 2005re'g:fr'ding the Subject Project. Our responses are enumerated similar to your original letter and are in bold. Original County comments appear in Italics. 1. A revised conceptual plan must be prepared to show an appropriate drainage discharge location. If the discharge location will be into a sensitive area, then a conceptual discharge design must be shown: Since you plan to locate the detention vault under the road, please show that in the revised drainage plan. Road plan revised to show detention in the proposed cul-de-sac and conveyance going to the east via the existing water easement out side the area with toy structures and into to the proposed adjacent development conveyance system. Letter of intent form the adjacent property is included in the Preliminary TIR. ~ 2. If you plan to make the proposed road a public road, then a letter of agreement from the property owner directly to the west shall be provided to allow for dedication of his property road frontage. 3. 4. There is no plan to dedicate the proposed road. That portion of the cul-de-sac containing the detention vault could be dedicated to the County if required. The conceptual road plan shows a drainage system located in the center of the road. KCRS Drawing 1-003 requires a crowned centerline unless a variance to this requirement is approved. This will be a condition of approval. Road design changed to show a crowned centerline per KCRS Standard Drawing 1- 003. Please be advised that the County will require that all toy structures be safely and pennanent/y anchored. This may conflict with the Utility District's easement. Please prepare a conceptual recreation tract showing the location of the easement, landscaping, toy facilities and any other improvements. The conceptual recreation plan must be / ,,, Ms, Dehkordi January 5, 2006 Page2 of2 • reviewed by the district to determine that no conflict will exist. Soos Creek Water and Sewer in a letter had agreed to relinquish the north 20' of the existing 30' water line easement subject to final review. All toy structures that require anchoring will be located out side the remaining south 10' of the water line easement. Conceptual Recreation Space Plan is now added to Sheet 2 of 2 of the Short Plat map. 5. The preliminary TIR proposed the use of infiltration for flow control. If infiltration is to be used, a soils report must be prepared and submitted for review by ODES. The report must include the infiltration rate. Alternatively, the TIR and conceptual drainage plan may be revised to reflect a larger pond size without the use of infiltration. Infiltration at this time will not be used. The TIR calculations show detention sizing per Level 2 Flow control. Addendum 1. The current discharge point located in the Soos Creek Plat (off-site) does not appear to comply with the natural discharge location. KCSWDM Section 1. 2. 1 states the following: "All surface water runoff from a project must be discharged at the natural location so as not to be diverted onto or away from downstream properties. The manner in which it is discharged from the project must not create a significant impact to downhill properties or drainage systems (see "Discharge Requirements').· A SWDM adjustment will be required with the next submittal, Since the Plat of Fleuve Des Voiles does not drain to the natural discharge location. It is antic ve Des Voiles will change their preliminary des n to be in complian i CSWDNI Section 1.2.1. If they don't, It would be logl for Fleuve Des Voiles to uest a SWDM adjustment. Enclosed please find copies of documents cited in this letter and 4 copies of the revised drainage plans. We do not see the need to revise the site plan. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact me at (206) 306-8880 or email me at deenlang@yahoo.co Enclosure Cc Fanny Yee SOOS CREEK WA1. ~l & SEWER DISTRIC1' 14616 S.E. 192nd St. • P.O. Box 58039 • Renton, WA 98058-1039 • Phone (253) 630-9900 • Fax (253) 630-5289 September I, 2005 Ms. Fanny Yee RE: Short Plat Dear Fanny: K.C. D.D.E.S. L04S0065 This letter is in response to your request for a letter to reduce a JO-foot construction easement that Soos Creek now holds for the installation of a water line to a IO-foot easement. Soos Creek will require a minimum of a JO-foot easement for the installation of the water line; however, we have no problem reducing that to a IO-foot easement after the line is constructed. The easement we are discussing is from Alaskan House Movers to King County Water District No. 58 (33~23-5-21). Sincerely, a4{~ Ron Speer District Manager RS:lks C:\Linda\LETIERSIFannyYee.doc www.sc1oscrcck.cnm 0 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 January 4, 2006 De-En Lang Lang Associates Inc. 10658 Rivera Place NE Seattle, WA 98125 RE: Application for the Preliminary Yee Short Plat DDES File No. L04S0065 Dear Mr. Lang: Thank you for your request for an extension of the deadline for the submittal of the additional information required to process the above referred preliminary short plat application. The request for additional information stops all processing of the plat application until the required information is received. The time spent waiting for information to be submitted is not counted toward any time limit requirements of the plat application process. Per your request a final extension has been granted If the Land Use Services Division of ODES does not receive the necessary information requested to process your application by March 6, 2006, your application may be canceled or denied. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, l-~-l)~l~~- Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division Cc: Curt Foster, Engineer, Engineering Review Section Planning File soc Page I of I Foster, Curt From: DEENLANG Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 11 :54 AM To: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Cc: Foster, Curt; Todd Popelka; Philip M. & Fanny Y. Yee; Mike Luna Subject: Yee Short Plat-L04S0065 Fereshteh Hope you had a wonderful holiday. We just realize that the deadline for resubmjtta] is 12/30/05 and some of our consultants are on an extended holiday. We do have must of the revision completed and necessary documents collected, just waiting for a conceptual recreation plan. Please give us a short extension so we can complete the revision. Thanks. De-En 01/03/2006 -soc Page I of8 Foster, Curt From: DEENLANG Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 12:24 PM To: Fanny Yee Cc: Dehkordi, Fereshteh; Foster, Curt; Todd Popelka Subject: Re: FW: Yee Short Plat-L05S0065 Fanny I am Cc this to King County so they know that WD is OK with landscaping as long as no trees are planted in the easement. Thanks. De-En Fanny Yee <Fyee@llud.net> wrote: FYI -do we need from Ron? -----Original Message----- From: Ron Speer [mailto:RSpeer@sooscreek.com] Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 4:41 PM To: Fanny Yee Subject: RE: Yee Short Plat-L05S0065 Fanny Shrubs are ok but small trees can become big trees. Ron Speer Soos Creek Water & Sewer District P.O. Box 58039 Renton, WA 98058 email:rspeer@sooscreek.com phone: 253-630-9900xl02 fax: 253-630-5289 -----Original Message----- From: Fanny Yee [mailto:Fyee@nud.net] Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 4:33 PM To: Ron Speer Subject: RE: Yee Short Plat-L05S0065 Ron: Does the District's easement policy preclude the landscaping of the easement area with shrubs and small trees? Fanny 11/15/2005 -----Original Message----- From: Ron Speer [mailto:RSpeer@sooscreek.com] Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 4:30 PM To: Fanny Yee Cc: De-En Lang (E-mail); Alice Marshall; Alan Eades Subject: RE: Yee Short Plat-L0550065 . soc 11/15/2005 Page 2 of8 Fanny We do not foresee a problem, but until we receive your plat design we cannot approve it. Ron Speer Soos Creek Water & Sewer District P.O. Box 58039 Renton, WA 98058 email:rspeer@sooscreek.com phone: 253-630-9900xl02 fax: 253-630-5289 -----Original Message----- From: Fanny Yee [mailto:Fyee@nud.net] Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 4:09 PM To: Ron Speer Cc: De-En Lang (E-mail) Subject: FW: Yee Short Plat-L05S0065 Ron: KC is happy with your letter about the location of play equipment on my proposed short plat. They want me to confirm that the District is okay with landscaping of the utility easement (see KC's email below). I don't think we need another letter from you; your email reply will be sufficient. Thanks. Fanny -----Original Message----- From: De-En Lang [mailto:deenlang@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 4:01 PM To: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Cc: Curtis R. Foster; Todd Popelka; Fanny Yee; Mike Luna Subject: RE: Yee Short Plat-L05S0065 Fereshteh Thank you for your quick response. I hereby instruct our engineer to revise the plan accordingly. De-En "Dehkordi, Fereshteh" <Fereshteh.Dehkordi@METROKC. GOV> wrote: De-En: It appears that the utility district has no problem reducing the easement. So as far as the required toy equipment can be placed outside of the easement and be properly anchored, I don't see any problem with the recreation tract being encumbered by a I 0-foot wide utility easement. Landscaping will be required for the recreation tract. Please confitm this with the District that landscaping requirements will not conflict with their easement. soc 11/15/2005 You must be back by now. Hope you enjoyed your trip! Fereshteh -----Original Message----- From: DEENLANG Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 3:39 PM To: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Cc: Foster, Curt; Fanny Yee; Todd Popelka Subject: Re: Yee Short Plat-LOSS0065 Fereshteh I received your reminder for additional information dated 11/8/05. But you have not responded to our question contained in the attached email. Are we to assume you have accepted Soos Creek WD's Jetter and should go ahead revise our plan accordingly? Please Jet us know. Thanks. De-En De-En Lang <deen/ang@ya/100.eom> wrote: Fereshteh Attached please find the letter from Mr. Ron Speer, District Manager of Soos Creek Water & Sewer District stating that the district "have no problem reducing that (the 30' easement) to a 10-foot easement after the line is constructed". If this Jetter is assurance enough to the staff, we would then proceed to revised the plans accordingly. Thank you for your help. De-En De-En Lang <deenlang@ya/100.eom> wrote: Fereshteh Thank you for your prompt response. We will get a letter of intent from Soos Creek indicating that if the short plat receives preliminary approval they will relinquish the 20' before construction starts. No one will grant or relinquish any easement unless they are assured that the project is approved and moving ahead. I know this was the way we handled this kind of issue in the past like the drainage easement we would get from Fleuve Des Voiles when and if both project are approved. Does this make sense to you? De-En "Dehkordi, Fereshteh" <Fereshteh.Dehkordi@METROKC.GOV> wrote: De-En: I am forwarding Curt's comments to you. If Page 3 of8 soc 11/15/2005 you have any questions regarding the Rid facility, please contact Curt. Please note that during the preliminary review, staff has to determine that the proposal would work. it appears that utility District is not sure if it can allow the reduction of the 30-foot easement. The area encumbered by the easement would be use for recreation tract and RID facility. The staff must be assured that the construction of both R/D and recreation tract can be done without any restriction. You have the option of placing the RID vault under the road. For the recreation part, you need to get an assurance that your conceptual recreation plan, including toy facility and landscaping could be within the District's easement. Fereshteh -----Original Message----- From: Foster, Curt Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:31 AM To: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Subject: FW: Yee Short Plat-L05S0065 Hi Fereshteh, I'm forwarding my comment to you. Ron Speer stated that the District may reduce the 30 foot easement to 10 feet once they have an approved final plat. Unfortunately the R/D facility needs to be installed prior to final recording. A revised site plan will be required, if the R/D facility cannot be located as shown (within the easement). Additionally, this will include preliminary sizing calculations if the facility is altered. Curt -----Original Message----- From: DEENLANG Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 9:17 PM To: Fanny Yee Cc: Dehkordi, Fereshteh; Foster, Curt Subject: Yee Short Plat-L05S0065 Fanny I'm forwarding these email excahnges to King County for their reaction. Page 4 of8 soc 11/15/2005 De-En Fanny Yee <Fyee@nud.net> wrote: De-En: Will the county buy this or do I need a letter from Soos. If I do, what does it have to say. Is "consider" good enough? Please ask KC first before I ask for the letter so I don't have to keep bugging them. Fanny -----Original Message----- From: Ron Speer [mailto:RSpeer@sooscreek.com] Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 4:46 PM To: Fanny Yee Cc: Alan Eades; Alice Marshall Subject: RE: Short Plat Fanny The District will consider reducing the easement to 10 feet from the existing 30 feet once we have the approved final plat. I am glad this easement has no connection with what I asked you to sign for the sewer easement. . Have a nice day. Ron Speer Soos Creek Water & Sewer District P.O. Box 58039 Renton, WA 98058 email:rspeer@sooscreek.com phone:253-630-9900xl02 fax: 253-630-5289 -----Original Message----- From: Fanny Yee [mailto:Fyee@nud.net] Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 8:01 AM To: Ron Speer Subject: RE: Short Plat Ron: The attached Word document is a copy of the easement from Alaska House Movers to KCWD Page 5 of 8 • soc 11/15/2005 No. 58. AHM had planned to build three houses and ended up building just one. I bought that house and the two vacant lots in the early 80's. I am not sure if they paid any connection fees or assessments on the two vacant lots. Can you please check? I am also requesting that the District release the eastern portion of the easement that it does not use back to me so that I can complete the short plat. Thanks. Fanny -----Original Message---- From: Fanny Yee Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 3:06 PM To: 'rspeer@sooscreek.com' Subject: Short Plat Ron: As you know, I am doing a short plat in SCWSD. The District has formed a ULID to bring sewer service to my and my neighbor's properties. When I was asked to sign over the easement to the District with no compensation, I did. This is my first short plat and I don't really know what I am doing. During the short plat Page 6 of8 . soc 11/15/2005 process, King County has informed me that I need to provide space for kids play equipment and a 10-foot wide storm water detention vault. If I were a seasoned developer, I would have reserved those rights for myself before signing the easement over to the District at no cost. But I am not and now I am stuck. Alice did give me a letter that allows me to put the playground equipment in the easement area if they are not anchored. The County is not satisfied with that because it requires playground equipment to be anchored for safety. The playground equipment, I am told, typically have two to three feet of anchoring. Will SCWSD consider either releasing the easterly 70' of the ' easement back to me (There's no sewer in that area because it's beyond the end of the planned sewer line.) Page 7 of8 '. soc 11/15/2005 or give me permission to put the playground equipment and a detention vault in the easement area as long as I stay away from any District facilities? I have asked Alice if it will be okay for me to hire Greg Hill to look at my proposal to see if it is feasible. Alice told me that it would be inappropriate to do so because Greg is a consultant to SCWSD. Ron, is there anyway you can help me out? I don't see my requests doing any harm to the District's facilities. I am going to the September SPU Operating Board and MWPAAC meetings in Bellevue. I will appreciate some of your time to talk about this face to face after either meeting. Fanny Page 8 of 8 .. soc Page I of 5 Foster, Curt From: DEENLANG Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 4:01 PM To: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Cc: Foster, Curt; Todd Popelka; Philip M. & Fanny Y. Yee; Mike Luna Subject: RE: Yee Short Plat~4 ;ia,6!. Fereshteh Thank you for your quick response. I hereby instruct our engineer to revise the plan accordingly. De-En "Dehkordi, Fereshteh" <Fereshteh.Dehkordi@,METROKC. GOV> wrote: De-En: It appears that the utility district has no problem reducing the easement. So as far as the required toy equipment can be placed outside of the easement and be properly anchored, I don't see any problem with the recreation tract being encumbered by a 10-foot wide utility casement. Landscaping will be required for the recreation tract. Please confirm this with the District that landscaping requirements will not conflict with their easement. You must be back by now. Hope you enjoyed your trip! Fereshteh -----Original Message----- From: DEENLANG Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 3:39 PM To: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Cc: Foster, Curt; Fanny Yee; Todd Popelka Subject: Re: Yee Short Plat-LOSS0065 Fereshteh I received your reminder for additional information dated 11/8/05. But you have not responded to our question contained in the attached email. Are we to assume you have accepted Soos Creek WD's letter and should go ahead revise our plan accordingly? Please let us know. Thanks. De-En De-En Lang <deenlang@yalwo.com> wrote: Fereshteh Attached please find the letter from Mr. Ron Speer, District Manager of Soos Creek Water & Sewer District stating that the district "have no problem reducing that (the 30' easement) to a 10-foot easement after the line is constructed". If this letter is assurance enough to the staff, we would then proceed to revised the plans accordingly. Thank you for your help. De-En De-En Lang <deenlang@yahoo.com> wrote: 11/14/2005 ... soc Fereshteh Thank you for your prompt response. We will get a letter of intent from Soos Creek indicating that if the short plat receives preliminary approval they will relinquish the 20' before construction starts. No one will grant or relinquish any easement unless they are assured that the project is approved and moving ahead. I know this was the way we handled this kind of issue in the past like the drainage easement we would get from Fleuve Des Voiles when and if both project are approved. Does this make sense to you? De-En "Dehkordi, Fereslttel," <Feresl,teh.Del,kordi@METROKC. GOV> wrote: De-En: I am forwarding Curt's conunents to you. If you have any questions regarding the Rid facility, please contact Curt. Please note that during the preliminary review, staff has to determine that the proposal would work. it appears that utility District is not sure if it can allow the reduction of the 30-foot easement. The area encumbered by the easement would be use for recreation tract and RID facility. The staff must be assured that the construction of both RID and recreation tract can be done without any restriction. You have the option of placing the RID vault under the road. For the recreation part, you need to get an assurance that your conceptual recreation plan, including toy facility and landscaping could be within the District's easement. Fereshteh -----Original Message----- From: Foster, Curt Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:31 AM To: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Subject: FW: Yee Short Plat-L05S0065 Hi Fereshteh, I'm forwarding my comment to you. Ron Speer stated that the District may reduce the 30 foot easement to 10 feet once they have an approved final plat. Unfortunately the R/D facility needs to be installed prior to final recording. A revised site plan will be required, if the R/D facility cannot be located as shown (within the easement). Additionally, this will include preliminary sizing calculations if the facility is altered. Curt -----Original Message----- From: DEENLANG Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 9:17 PM To: Fanny Yee Cc: Dehkordi, Fereshteh; Foster, Curt Subject: Yee Short Plat-L05S0065 I 1/14/2005 Page 2 of5 ... soc anny 'm forwarding these email excahnges to King County for their reaction. e-En anny Yee <Fyee@Jlud.net> wrote: e-En: Will the county buy this or do I need a letter from Soos. f I do, what does it have to say. Is "consider" good enough? lease ask KC first before I ask for the letter so I don't have to eep bugging them. Fanny ----Original Message----- rom: Ron Speer [mailto:RSpeer@sooscreek.com] nt: Monday, August 29, 2005 4:46 PM o: Fanny Yee c: Alan Eades; Alice Marshall ubject: RE: Short Plat anny he District will consider reducing the easement to 10 feet from the xisting 30 feet once we have the approved final plat. · am glad this easement has no connection with what I asked you to ign for the sewer easement. ave a nice day. on Speer oos Creek Water & Sewer District .0. Box 58039 enton, WA 98058 mail:rspeer@sooscreek.com hone: 253-630-9900x\02 ax: 253-630-5289 -----Original Message----- From: Fanny Yee [mailto:Fyee@nud.net] Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 8:01 AM To: Ron Speer Subject: RE: Short Plat Ron: The attached Word document is a copy of the easement from Alaska House Movers to KCWD No. 58. AHM had planned to build three houses and ended up building just one. I bought that house and the two vacant lots in the early 80's. I am not sure if they paid any connection fees or assessments on the two vacant lots. Can you please check? I am also requesting that the District release the eastern portion of the easement that it does not use back to me so that I can complete the short plat. Thanks. 11/14/2005 Page 3 of 5 • soc 11/14/2005 Fanny -----Original Message----- From: Fanny Yee Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 3:06 PM To: 'rspeer@sooscreek.com' Subject: Short Plat Ron: As you know, I am doing a short plat in SCWSD. The District has formed a ULID to bring sewer service to my and my neighbor's properties. When I was asked to sign over the easement to the District with no compensation, I did. This is my first short plat and I don't really know what I am doing. During the short plat process, King County has informed me that I need to provide space for kids play equipment and a 10-foot wide storm water detention vault. If I were a seasoned developer, I would have reserved those rights for myself before signing the easement over to the District at no cost. But I am not and now I am stuck. Alice did give me a letter that allows me to put the playground equipment in the easement area if they are not anchored. The County is not satisfied with that because it requires playground equipment to be anchored for safety. The playground equipment, I am told, typically have two to three feet of anchoring. Will SCWSD consider either releasing the easterly 70' of the easement back to me (There's no sewer in that area because it's beyond the end of the planned sewer line.) or give me permission to put the playground equipment and a detention vault in the easement area as long as I stay away from any District facilities? I have asked Alice if it will be okay for me to hire Greg Hill to look at my proposal to see if it is feasible. Alice told me that it would be Page 4 of 5 .• soc • 11/14/2005 inappropriate to do so because Greg is a consultant to SCWSD. Ron, is there anyway you can help me out? I don't see my requests doing any harm to the District's facilities. I am going to the September SPU Operating Board and MWPAAC meetings in Bellevue. I will appreciate some of your time to talk about this face to face after either meeting. Fanny Page 5 of5 ·"'-, soc Page I of3 Foster, Curt From: Foster, Curt Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:31 AM To: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Subject: FW: Yee Short Plat-L05S0065 Hi Fereshteh, I'm forwarding my comment to you. Ron Speer stated that the District may reduce the 30 foot easement to 10 feet once they have an approved final plat. Unfortunately the R/D facility needs to be installed prior to final recording. A revised site plan will be required, if the R/D facility cannot be located as shown (within the easement). Additionally, this will include preliminary sizing calculations if the facility is altered. Curt -----Original Message----- From: DEENLANG Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 9:17 PM To: Fanny Yee Cc: Dehkordi, Fereshteh; Foster, Curt Subject: Yee Short Plat-L05S0065 Fanny I'm forwarding these email excahnges to King County for their reaction. De-En Fanny Yee <Fyee@llud.net> wrote: De-En: Will the county buy this or do I need a letter from Soos. If I do, what does it have to say. Is "consider" good enough? Please ask KC first before I ask for the letter so I don't have to keep bugging them. Fanny -----Original Message----- From: Ron Speer [mailto:RSpeer@sooscreek.com] Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 4:46 PM To: Fanny Yee Cc: Alan Eades; Alice Marshall Subject: RE: Short Plat Fanny The District will consider reducing the easement to 10 feet from the existing 30 feet once we have the approved final plat. I am glad this easement has no connection with what I asked you to sign for the sewer easement. Have a nice day. Ron Speer Soos Creek Water & Sewer District P.O. Box 58039 Renton, WA 98058 email:rspeer@sooscreek.com 08/30/2005 , Page 2 of3 phone:253-630-9900x102 fax: 253-630-5289 -----Original Message----- From: Fanny Yee [mailto:Fyee@nud.net] Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 8:01 AM To: Ron Speer Subject: RE: Short Plat Ron: The attached Word document is a copy of the easement from Alaska House Movers to KCWD No. 58. AHM had planned to build three houses and ended up building just one. I bought that house and the two vacant lots in the early BO's. I am not sure if they paid any connection fees or assessments on the two vacant lots. Can you please check? I am also requesting that the District release the eastern portion of the easement that it does not use back to me so that I can complete the short plat. Thanks. Fanny 08/30/2005 -----Original Message----- From: Fanny Yee Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 3:06 PM To: 'rspeer@sooscreek.com' Subject: Short Plat Ron: As you know, I am doing a short plat in SCWSD. The District has formed a ULID to bring sewer service to my and my neighbor's properties. When I was asked to sign over the easement to the District with no compensation, I did. This is my first short plat and I don't really know what I am doing. During the short plat process, King County has informed me that I need to provide space for kids play equipment and a 10-foot wide storm water detention vault. If I were a seasoned developer, I would have reserved those rights for myself before signing the easement over to the District at no cost. But I am not and now I am stuck. Alice did give me a letter that allows me to put the playground equipment in the easement area if they are not anchored. The County is not satisfied with that because it requires playground equipment to be anchored for safety. The playground equipment, I am told, typically have two to three feet of anchoring. Will SCWSD consider either releasing the easterly 70' of the easement back to me (There's no sewer in that area because it's beyond the end of the planned sewer line.) or give me permission to put the playground ·"' soc 08/30/2005 Page 3 of3 equipment and a detention vault in the easement area as long as I stay away from any District facilities? I have asked Alice if it will be okay for me to hire Greg Hill to look at my proposal to see if it is feasible. Alice told me that it would be inappropriate to do so because Greg is a consultant to SCWSD. Ron, is there anyway you can help me out? I don't see my requests doing any harm to the District's facilities. I am going to the September SPU Operating Board and MWPAAC meetings in Bellevue. I will appreciate some of your time to talk about this face to face after either meeting. Fanny soc Page I of3 Foster, Curt From: DEENLANG Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 12: 15 PM To: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Cc: Foster, Curt; Fanny Yee; Todd Popelka Subject: Yee Short Plat-L05S0065 Fereshteh Thank you for your prompt response. We will get a letter of intent from Soos Creek indicating that if the short plat receives preliminary approval they will relinquish the 20' before construction starts. No one will grant or relinquish any easement unless they are assured that the project is approved and moving ahead. I know this was the way we handled this kind of issue in the past like the drainage easement we would get from Fleuve Des Voiles when and if both project are approved. Does this make sense to you? De-En "Dehkordi, Fereshteh" <Fereshteh.Dehkordi@METROKC.GOV> wrote: De-En: I am forwarding Curt's comments to you. If you have any questions regarding the Rid facility, please contact Curt. Please note that during the preliminary review, staff has to determine that the proposal would work. it appears that utility District is not sure ifit can allow the reduction of the 30-foot easement. The area encumbered by the easement would be use for recreation tract and RID facility. The staff must be assured that the constrnction of both RID and recreation tract can be done without any restriction. You have the option of placing the RID vault under the road. For the recreation part, you need to get an assurance that your conceptual recreation plan, including toy facility and landscaping could be within the District's easement. Fereshteh -----Original Message----- From: Foster, Curt Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:31 AM To: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Subject: FW: Yee Short Plat-L0550065 Hi Fereshteh, I'm forwarding my comment to you. Ron Speer stated that the District may reduce the 30 foot easement to 10 feet once they have an approved final plat. Unfortunately the R/0 facility needs to be installed prior to final recording. A revised site plan will be required, if the R/0 facility cannot be located as shown (within the easement). Additionally, this will include preliminary sizing calculations if the facility is altered. Curt -----Original Message----- From: DEENLANG Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 9:17 PM 09/01/2005 soc To: Fanny Yee Cc: Dehkordi, Fereshteh; Foster, Curt Subject: Yee Short Plat-L05S0065 Fanny I'm forwarding these email excahnges to King County for their reaction. De-En Fanny Yee <Fyee@nud.net> wrote: De-En: Will the county buy this or do I need a letter from Soos. If I do, what does it have to say. Is "consider" good enough? Please ask KC first before I ask for the letter so I don't have to keep bugging them. Fanny -----Original Message----- From: Ron Speer [mailto:RSpeer@sooscreek.com] Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 4:46 PM To: Fanny Yee Cc: Alan Eades; Alice Marshall Subject: RE: Short Plat Fanny The District will consider reducing the easement to 10 feet from the existing 30 feet once we have the approved final plat. I am glad this easement has no connection with what I asked you to sign for the sewer easement. Have a nice day. Ron Speer Soos Creek Water & Sewer District P.O. Box 58039 Renton, WA 98058 email:rspeer@sooscreek.com phone:253-630-9900xl02 fax: 253-630-5289 -----Original Message----- From: Fanny Yee [mailto:Fyee@nud.net] Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 8:01 AM To: Ron Speer Subject: RE: Short Plat Ron: The attached Word document is a copy of the easement from Alaska House Movers to KCWD No. 58. AHM had planned to build three houses and ended up building just one. I bought that house and the two vacant lots in the early BO's. I am not sure if they paid any connection fees or assessments on the two vacant lots. Can you please check? I am also requesting that the District release the eastern portion of the easement that it does not use back to me so that I can complete the short plat. Thanks. 09/01/2005 Page 2 of3 ~ soc Fanny 09/01/2005 -----Original Message----- From: Fanny Yee Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 3:06 PM To: 'rspeer@sooscreek.com' Subject: Short Plat Ron: As you know, I am doing a short plat in SCWSD. The District has formed a ULID to bring sewer service to my and my neighbor's properties. When I was asked to sign over the easement to the District with no compensation, I did. This is my first short plat and I don't really know what I am doing. During the short plat process, King County has informed me that I need to provide space for kids play equipment and a 10-foot wide storm water detention vault. If I were a seasoned developer, I would have reserved those rights for myself before signing the easement over to the District at no cost. But I am not and now I am stuck. Alice did give me a letter that allows me to put the playground equipment in the easement area if they are not anchored. The County is not satisfied with that because it requires playground equipment to be anchored for safety. The playground equipment, I am told, typically have two to three feet of anchoring. Will SCWSD consider either releasing the easterly 70' of the easement back to me (There's no sewer in that area because it's beyond the end of the planned sewer line.) or give me permission to put the playground equipment and a detention vault in the easement area as long as I stay away from any District facilities? I have asked Alice if it will be okay for me to hire Greg Hill to look at my proposal to see if it is feasible. Alice told me that it would be inappropriate to do so because Greg is a consultant to SCWSD. Ron, is there anyway you can help me out? I don't see my requests doing any harm to the District's facilities. I am going to the September SPU Operating Board and MWPAAC meetings in Bellevue. I will appreciate some of your time to talk about this face to face after either meeting. Fanny Page 3 of3 :,· Foster, Curt From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: De-En: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Monday, August 29, 2005 8:38 AM 'deenlang@yahoo.com' Foster, Curt FW: L04S0065-Fanny Yee Addendum Please see the attached amendment to Curt's request for additional information. thanks -----Original Message----- From: Foster, Curt Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 3:16 PM To: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Subject: L04S0065-Fanny Yee Addendum Hi Fereshteh, I met with Bruce Whittaker this morning to discuss drainage coordination issues with his project (L04P0002-Soos Creek Plat), located along the down slope flow path immediately east of the Fanny Yee property. Unfortunately, the proposed discharge point (for flow leaving the Fanny Yee property) is not the natural discharge location and a SWDM adjustment is required. As a result, I'm adding the adjustment request as an addendum (attached) to our screening letter (dated 8/23/5). I talked to Mr. Lang (agent) and explained the situation to him. Sorry about the inconvenience, Curt L04S0065-Fanny Yee Adendum 8-2 ... 1 A L04S0065-Fanny Yee Addendum to Screening Letter (Dated 8-23-5) In an effort to coordinate drainage issues with the Soos Creek Plat (L04P0002), located along the down slope flow path immediately east of the Fanny Yee property, it was disclosed that the proposed discharge point (for flow leaving the Fanny Yee property) is not the natural discharge location. As a result the following additional comment is added as an addendum to the screening letter dated 8/23/5. I. The current discharge point located in the Soos Creek Plat (off-site) does not appear to comply with the natural discharge location. KCSWDM Section 1.2.1 states the following: "All surface water runoff from a project must be discharged at the natural location so as not to be diverted onto or away from downstream properties. The manner in which it is discharged from the project must not create a significant impact to downhill properties or drainage systems (see "Discharge Requirements")." A SWDM adjustment will be required with the next submittal. Please submit the following by October 24'\ 2005. I. Four copies of an approved diversion adjustment. ,: • Foster, Curt From: Sent: To: S_ubject: Hi Fereshteh, Foster, Curt Friday, August 26, 2005 3:16 PM Dehkordi, Fereshteh L04S0065-Fanny Yee Addendum I met with Bruce Whittaker this morning to discuss drainage coordination issues with his project (L04P0002-Soos Creek Plat), located along the down slope flow path immediately east of the Fanny Yee property. Unfortunately, the proposed discharge point (for flow leaving the Fanny Yee property) is not the natural discharge location and a SWDM adjustment is required. As a result, I'm adding the adjustment request as an addendum (attached) to our screening letter (dated 8/23/5). I talked' to Mr. Lang (agent) and explained the situation to him. Sorry about the inconvenience, Curt L0450065-Fanny Yee Adendum 8-2 ... 1 ' ., • .. L04S0065-Fanny Yee Addendum to Screening Letter (Dated 8-23-5) In an effort to coordinate drainage issues with the Soos Creek Plat (L04P0002), located along the down slope flow path immediately east of the Fanny Yee property, it was disclosed that the proposed discharge point (for flow leaving the Fanny Yee property) is not the natural discharge location. As a result the following additional comment is added as an addendum to the screening letter dated 8/23/5. I. The current discharge point located in the Soos Creek Plat (off-site) does not appear to comply with the natural discharge location. KCSWDM Section 1.2.1 states the following: "All surface water runoff from a project must be discharged at the natural location so as not to be diverted onto or away from downstream properties. The manner in which it is discharged from the project must not create a significant impact to downhill properties or drainage systems (see "Discharge Requirements")." A SWDM adjustment will be required with the next submittal. Please submit the following by October 241 \ 2005. 1. Four copies of an approved diversion adjustment. ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 August 23, 2005 De-En Lang Lang Associates Inc. 10658 Riviera Place NE Seattle, WA 98125 RE: Notice of Request for Additional Infonnation or Studies, KC File L04S0065 Dear Mr. Lang: We have reviewed the supplemental infonnation submitted on July 23, 2005 and have the following comments: I. A revised concep\ual plan must be prepared to show an appropriate .drainage discharge location. If the discharge location will be into a sensitive area, then a conceptual · discharge design must be shown. Since you plan to locate the detention vault under the road, please show that in the revised drainage plan. 2. If you plan to make the proposed road a public road, then a letter of agreement from the property owner directly to the west shall be provided to allow for dedication of his property road frontage. 3. The conceptual road plan shows a drainage system located in the center of the road. KCRS Drawing 1-003 requires a crowned centerline unless a variance to this requirement is approved. This will be a condition of approval. 4. Please be advised that the County will require that all toy structures be safely and pennanently anchored. This may conflict with the Utility District's easement. Please prepare a conceptual recreation tract showing the location of the easement, landscaping, toy facilities and any other improvements. The conceptual recreation plan must be reviewed by the district to detennine that no conflict will exist. 5. The preliminary TIR proposed the use of infiltration for flow control. If infiltration is to be used, a soils report must be prepared and submitted for review by ODES. The report must include the infiltration rate. Alternatively, the TIR and conceptual drainage plan may be revised to reflect a larger pond size without the use of infiltration. Please submit the following by October 24, 2005: 1. Four copies of a revised conceptual drainage plan 2. Four copies of a revised site plan if any change is proposed 3. Four copies of a conceptual recreation plan 4. A letter of approval regarding the recreation plan by the District. 5. A letter of intent from the property owner directly west of site agreeing to dedicate frontage for a public road. 6. Four copies of a Soils Report, stamped by a licensed engineer. If you have any questions regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project/Program Manager Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division cc: Fanny & Philip Yee Curt Foster, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, Land Use Services Division Application File SOOS CREEK WATE1'" & SEWER DISTRICT 14616 S.E. 192nd St. • PO. Box 58039 • Renton, WA 98058-1039 • Phone (253) 630-9900 • Fax (253) 630-5289 July 21, 2005 Ms. Fanny Yee 11431 238 1h St SW Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Parcel Nos. 619900 0126 and 0127 Yee Short Plat Dear Ms. Yee: This letter confirms that the District is not opposed to playground equipment within the proposed water easement area of this short plat with the understanding that the equipment is not permanently anchored. The District will not take any responsibility for the equipment in the event that they need to access their easement. Please contact me at (253) 630-9900 ext 107 or via email at amarshall@sooscreek.coni if you have any questions. Sincerely, Alice R. Marshall Supervisor, Development Administration Enclosures www.sooscreek.com ,.. -. , ..... LO 4 s _ 0 6 5-ETTER OF INTENT lfJ&@mowm JUL 2 J2oas @ K.c. D.D.E.s. June 24,005 Re: Yee Short Plat, L04S0065 To Whom It May Concern: Philip M. and Fanny Y. Yee ("Yee"), Husband and wife own the two tax lots 619900-0126 and 619900-0127 known as the Yee Short Plat application. Ritz Trust own Tax Lot 619900-0220 property known as the development of the Fleuve des Voiles (L04P0002), located adjacent and to the east of the Yee property. Ravenna Development, LLC, developer of Fleuve des Voiles (L04P0002) has an open escrow to purchase the Ritz Trust tax lot 619900-0220 and will complete the purchase upon preliminary plat approvat of the development of the Fleuve des Voiles (L04P0002). The Soos Creek Water and Sewer District has indicated that the development of the Fleuve des Voiles plat will require a connection to the existing stubbed out water line on the Yee's property. The Yees are desirous of allowing treated storm water to drain through the future Fleuve des Voiles storm system. The Ravenna Development, LLC and the Yees .. have agreed to execute a Mutual Easement Agreement in the form attached upon the close of escrow to purchase the Ritz Trust tax lot 619900-0220. It is the intention of the Yees and Mr. Charles Spaeth, as Manager of Ravenna Development, LLC to sign the Mutual Easement Agreement in the form attached as soon as Fleuve des Voiles and Yee Short Plat receives preliminary plat approval from King County and the escrow closes on the Ritz Trust tax lot 619900-0220. YEES Address: 11431 -238th Street SW Edmonds, WA 98020 Ravenna Development, LLC Address: 6839 Ravenna Ave NE · Seattle, WA 98115 Attachment: Mutual Easement Agreement Form for Yees -Ravenna Development, LLC , AFTER RECORDING PLEASE RETURN TO: DE-EN LANG 10658 RIVIERA PLACE NE SEATILE, WA 98125 MUTUAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT Properties Parcel "A" Owner(s) The Ritz Trust (Ritz Trust) nna Walters, Trustee Tax Lot 619900-0220 Number(s) Legal NORTHWESTERN GARDEN Descriptions TRACTS, DIVISION N0.5 LOT 2 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 388021 RECORDING NO 8902210370 SD SHORT PLAT DAF • TRACT 11 OF NORTHWESTERN GARDEN · TRACTS DIV NO 5 TGW S 240 FT OF LOT 1 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 582064 RECORDING NO 8404200923 TAXABLE PORTION PARTIALLY EXEMPT UNDER RCW 84.36.381 THRU .389 Mutual Easement Page 1 of 5 Ritz Trust. Yee Parcel "B" Philip M. Yee and Fanny Y. Yee 619900-0126 and 619900-0127 TRACT 6, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS, DIVISION NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT. THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 47 OF PLATS, PAGE 90, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 343 FEET THEREOF. This Mutual Easement Agreement is made this_ day of April 2005, by and between Tina Walters. Trustee of the Ritz Trust, hereinafter termed the 'Trustee•, and Phffip M. Yee and Fanny Y. Yee. hereinafter termed the 'Yee.' Trustee and the Yee are collectively referred to as 'Parties." BACKGROUND 1. Trustee's Property or Parcel 'A' Trustee is the legal owner of the property located at 12208 SE 192nd Street, Renton, Washington, tax lot 619900-0220, legally described as follows: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS, DIVISION N0.5 LOT 2 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 388021 RECORDING NO 8902210370 SD SHORT PLAT OAF -TRACT 11 OF NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO 5 TGW S 240 FT OF LOT 1 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 582064 RECORDING NO 8404200923 2. Yee's Property or Parcel 'B' Yee is the legal owner of the property located at 12040 SE 190U' Place and 12052 SE 190ll> Place, Renton, Washington, tax lots 619900-0126 and 619900-0127, legally described as follows: Tract 6, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS, DIVISION NO. 5, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 47 of Plats, page 90, records of King County, Washington; Except the West 343 feet thereof. 3. Water Main Easement Trustee has plan to develop Parcel ·A' and desires to have an easement across the southerly ten feet of Parcel 'B' for the installation and connection of a water main to the water distribution system of Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. 4. Drainage Easement Yee desires to develop Parcel 'B" and needs a drainage easement for the installation of a drainage pipe across Parcel 'A' for connection to the larger drainage collection system on Parcel 'A". The parties agree as follows: Mutual Easement Page 2of 5 Ritz Trust· Yee AGREEMENT ; · 5. . StQIID Drainage for Parcel "B" (a). Trustee agrees to create no less than a ten-foot-wide storm drain easement, or as required by King County (or its successor), in which a storm drainage pipe will be installed to receive direct runoff or runoff from a storm detention system on Parcel "B" as may be required. (b). Trustee shall determine the exact location of said storm drain easement which shall run easterly from the eastern boundary of Parcel "B" to the nearest feasible point of connection to a larger storm drainage system that shall service Parcel "A.' The storm drainage pipe as described in 5(a) shall not include any portion that may be used to service any potential or resulting subdivided lot(s) in Parcel "A.' (c). Trustee will be responsible for the selection and hiring of professionals for the design and construction of the storm drainage pipe described in (5a), in a manner acceptable to King County (or its successor}, as part of the larger drainage system that shall service Parcel ·A.· (d). Yee shall pay for the design, engineering and construction of the storm drainage pipe described in (Sa) directly to the engineer, consultant and contractor as itemized bid items and in separate billings. (e). The granting of said easement is subject to the condition that Yee pays for. (i) all costs of facilities to be constructed on Parcel ·s·, and (ii) any incremental costs for facilities to be constructed on Parcel 'A', which are directiy attributable to the added storm drainage volume from Parcel ·s·. These incremenlal costs include, but are not necessarily limited to, engineering design, permitting, construction of improvements and/or modifications, and/or enlargement of storm water detention, treatment, infiltration and/or discharge facilities on Parcel 'A". (ij. Trustee makes no warranty that the conveyance of storm runoff from Parcel 'B" can be permitted; or constructed for a specific cost. Yee shall not be responsible for the cost of any portion of the storm drainage system that may benefit Parcel 'A' except as set forth in 5(e). 6. Water Main Easement for Parcel 'A" (a). Yee agrees to grant no less than a ten-foot-wide easement to Soos Creek Water and Sewer District for a water main that shall be designed or approved by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District The easement will run from the eastern boundary of Parcel ·A', through an area defined as the southerly thirty (30) feet of Parcel 'B.' (b). The owner of Parcel 'B" agrees to grant no less than a thirty-foot-wide construction easement to accommodate installation of the water main. · Mutual Easement Page 3 of 5 Ritz Trust. Yee (c). This water main shall be Installed at the sole cost of Trustee. (d). Trustee agrees to restore Parcel 'B" to its original condition before construction with the exception of restoring vegetation that will have been removed from within the southerly thirty (30) feet of Parcel 'B' during construction. · 7. All provisions herein are to be completed within ten years from the date of this agreement. 8. This agreement is made for the mutual benefit of both parties; neither party will receive additional compensation directly or indirectly through another party for actions, conveyances, fulfillment of any obligations described above beyond the specific considerations described in this Agreement. 9. If any suit or action is commenced by either party, or their successors and/or assigns, to enforce any rights under this agreement, in addition to costs provided by statute, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of attorney's fees in such sum as the Court may adjudge just and reasonable. 10. The provisions of this Agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon future owners of Parcel "A" and Parcel 'B.' according to the terms set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have set our hands and seals this_ day of March 2005. Trustee: Yee: Tina Walters, Philip M. Yee Trustee of the Ritz Trust FannyY. Yee STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING ) ss. On this day of April 2005, before me personaUy appeared PHILIP M. YEE and ™ Y. YEE. to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and Mutual Easement Page4of5 Ritz Trust -Yee .. .._ -· ··• AFTER RECORDING PLEASE RETURN To: WIUIAMS CLARK PSC 6161 NE 175"<, SUITE 200 l<ENMORE, WA 98028 Grantor(s): Grantee(s): Beneflteded Property Tait Lot l\lo.: Burdened Property T Ill( Lot l\lo. EXelSE fAX NOf Rml!Rm KingCountyR~ BY: t6mc . 'Deputy J PhUip M. Yee and Fanny Y. Yee Analoliy Trofimenko and Rlnuna T rofimenko 619900-0210 619900-0126 and 619900-0127 This Temporary Use Easement is made this I~ of November 2004, by and between Ana1Dliv Trofimenko and Rimma Trofimenko, hereinafter tenned the 'Grantee', and fl!i!lR M. Yee and Fanny Y. Yee, hereinafter tenned "Grantor. • Grantor and Granlee are collectively referred to as "Parties." BACKGROUND 1. Grantor's Property/ 'Burdened Parcel" Gran tor is the legal owner of land localed at 12040 SE 1 !l{)lh Place and 12052 SE 19011> Place, Renton, Washington, tax lots 61990().0126 and 619900-0127, legally described as follows: Temporary Easement Page 1 of5 Yee-Trofitnenko ) days, Grantor may remove the shed, fence and other encroachment and blll Gran1ee for the related cosls. Grantor shall have no obligation to re-inslall the removed fence and shed. 7. This easement shall continue until cancel pursuant to paragraph 6 or when lhe Burdened Property is sold, whichever is ~ler. 8. If any suit or action is commenced by either party, or 1helr successors and/or assigns, to enforce any rights under this agreement or regarding any encroachment in addition to costs provided by statute, the prevailing party shaD be enlllled lo an award of attorney's fees In such sum as the Court may adjudge Just and reasonable. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have set our hands and~ this n of November 2004. Grantor: Fanny . Temporary Easement Page 3of5 Yee-Trofimenko Grantee: Rlmma Trollmenko ·, . ' Tract 6, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS, DIVISION NO. 5, according to the plat thereof recorded In Volume 47 of Plats, page 90, records of King County, Washington; Except the West 343 feet thereof. 2. Grantee's Property / "Beneffled Parcer Grantee Is the legal owner of the property localed to the south of Burdened Property, with an address of 19107 • 121ST PL SE, 98055, Renton, WA 98055, tax lot No. 6199000210, legally described as follows: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRS DIV #5 LOT 3 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 582064 RECORDING NO 8404200923SD SHORT PlAT OAF - TRACT 10 NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO 5 LESS W 113 FTOFS240FT 3. Encroachment Grantee has a wood shed and fence across a portion of the the southern most three feet of the Burdened Property. The encroachment was indentified in a Sepetmber 2004 survey by Sadler/Barnard & Associates, Inc., a flcensed surveyor In the State of Washington. A drawing of the properties and the encroachment is included as Exhibit 'A" for reference. 4. Grantor has no lmme<fiate use for Burdened Property and Grantee wishes to leave the fence and shed in place temporarily. The parties agree as follows: 5. Grantor grants a temporary easement to Grantee along and across a portion of the Southern three feet of the burdened property for the expressed purpose of allowing Grantee to leave his shed and fence temporarily in place. 6. Grantee agrees to relocate his fence, along with any fencing matelfals, away from the Burdened Property at his own cost, at any time, upon 30-days notice from Grantor. If Grantee fails to prompUy comply with Grantor's request to relocate the fence within 30 Temporary Easement Page 2 of 5 Yee· T rolimenko ; STA TE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING ) ss. On this ,?.?,fl day of Nowmber 2004, before me pe,sonaDy appeared PHILIP M. YEE and FANNYY. YEE. to me known to be the Individuals described In and who executed Ille within and fi>regolng inslrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the fi"ee end volunlaiy act and deed of said Grantors, forlhe uses and purposes 1hereln mentioned. WITNESS my hand and offlclal seal hereto afflxed 1he day and year above writlen. STATE Of WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING )ss. My commission expires: .10/?-/o;z... On this __ day of November 2004, before me pe!SOll80y appeared Analoliy Troflmenko and Rimma Trofimenko, to me known to be the Individuals described in and who executed the wilhin and foregoing lnstnunen~ and acknowledged sa!cl lnslrument to be the fi"ee and volunlary act and deed of said Gran1ees, for 1he uses and purposes 1h8leln mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year above written . .. ~ ... ;, . .. ; Temporary Easement Page4 of 5, Yee-Trofimenko My commission expires: 3 · ;:, Q · a ~ . . '. . .. • Temporary Easement Page 5of 5 Yee-Trofmenko Exhibit A Fence 1~ north of property line I I I I I I I ~, iif I ~ ~ -------- ~ ~~ I TRORMENKO - ' . ' K.C. o.o.E.S, AFTER REcoRDING Pl.EASE RETURN To: W1u1AMS C!ARK PSC · 6161 NE 175'", SUITE 200 KENMORE, WA 98028 Grantor(s): Granaa(9): Betl8ffledad Prop8rtv Tu Lot No.: Burdened Property Tu Lot l\9o. Philip M. Yee and Fanny Y. Yee Dennis A. Brevik and Deborah Brevik 619900-0186 619900-0126 This Temporary Use Easement is made this 't/i'! day of November 2004, by and between Demis A 8l8yjk and Deborah Bfeylk. hereinafter termed the "Grantee", and PhimM. Yee . and Fanny Y. Yee, hereinafter termed "Grantor.' Grantor and Grantee are coilecUvely referred to as "Parties.' BACKGROUND 1. Grantor's Property / "Burdened Parcer Grantoris the legal owner of land located at 12040 SE 19Qth Place, Renton, Washington, tax lots 619900-0126, legally described as follows: Temporary Easement Page 1 of5 Yee-Brevik . I ~"\ ,, NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRS DIV #5 E 143 FT OF W 486 FT OF TRACT 6 PJ<A LOT B OF REVISED KC SHORT SUBD NO 072f;l 2. Grantee's Property / 'Benefited Parcel" Grantee is lhe legal owner of the property located lo the south of Burdened Property, wi1h an address of 19103-121si Place SE, Renton, WA 98055, tax lot No. 6199000186, legally described as folloWs: NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRS DIV #5 LOT 4 OF REVISED KC SHORT Pl.AT NO 879082 RECORDING NO 8202190368 SD PLAT OAF -TRACT 9 OF NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO 5 LESS E 7 FT OF S 240 FT THOF 3. Encroachment Grantee has constructed a wood fence across the southern most three feel of the Burdened Property. The encroachment was lndentified in a Sepetmber 2004 survey by Sadler/Bamard & Associates, Inc., a licensed surveyor In the State of Washington. A drawing of the properties and the encroachment is included as Exhibit "A' for reference. 4. Grantor has no immediate use for Burdened Property and Grantee wishes lo leave lhe fence in place temporarily. The parties agree as follows: 5. Gran~_granls a temporary ~I!)~~ <!!!ms.~-across Soulh lhree feel of lhe bunlened property for the expressed purpose of alloWing Grantee to leave his fence temporarily in place. 6. Grantee 8Qf8E!S to relocate his fence, along with any fencing materials, away from the Burdened Property at his own cos~ at any time, upon 30-days notice from Grantor. If Grantee falls lo promptly comply with Grantor's request to relocate lhe fence within 30 days, Grantor may remove the fence and other encroachment and blU Grantee for the related costs. Grantor shall have no obligation to reinstall the removed fence material. Temporary Easement Page2of 5 Yee-Brevik -, ·, i:l 7. This easement shaD continue until cancel pursuant to paragraph 6 or when the Burdened Property Is sold, whichever Is earfrer. 8. If any suit or action Is commenced by eilher party, or their succeSS01S and/or assigns, to enfolce any righls under this agreement, or regarding any encroachment, In addition ID cos1s provided by statute, the substantially prevailing party shall be entifled to an awaro of attorney's fees in such sum as the Court may adjudge just and reasonable. .J. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have set our hands and seals lhls 1,'> day of November 2004. Grantor: Temporary Easement Page 3of5 Yee· Brevik Grantee: __ , ( ~ . . .• STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING I ss. D~r,/1--0n this EiC-day of November 2004, before me pen;onally appealed PHILIP M. YEE and FANNY Y. YEE, to me known to be 1he Individuals described In and who executed the within and wregoing insllUment, and BCknovt1edged said lnslrument to be the free and 1lllluntary act and deed of said Grantors, for the uses and pwposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seat hereto affixed the day and year allow written. STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING )ss. On this /a""-day of November 2004, before me pen;onal(y appeared DENNIS A. BREVll< and DEBORAH BREYJK, ID me known to be the Individuals desaibed in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument. and acknowledged said lnslnnnent to be the free end voluntary act and deed of said Grantees, for the uses end purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and olliclal seal hel8to affixed the day and year above written. -;-· ,. .. . :-··. Temporary Easement Page4 of 5 Yee-Brevil< My commission expires: J.4 I., f 4 ,J.. ()0£ .-,. ..... •ji·· Exhibit A Fence locaur noI1h of property line 8'1'11 i • .m RS-HD Temporary Easement Page 5 of 5 Yee-Bnwik ff!!_ 824• I I I I I I i I I •9f I I "'1 ,, I ~ ~~ I TROFIMENKO .- From: To: CC: Print -Close Window nSirnmons, Pat" <Pat.Simmons@METROKC.GOV> "'De-En Lang"' <deenlang@yahoo.com>, "Dehkordi, Fereshteh" <Fereshteh.Dehkordl@METROKC.GOV> "Fanny Yee" <fyee@nud.net>, "Mike Harris" <mlchael.harrls@ctt.com> Subject: RE: Yee Short Plat L0450065 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:53:29 -0800 Mike The recording number is item #7 per your title report 1144207 That is recording number 7810060608 this is shown as the legal access to the lot on the survey map. The item that needed to be clarified is the ingress, egress, drainage and utility easement shown of the assessor map and given title report. · I additional research the easement was created on unrecorded short plat 07257 which I have got a copy from or record. These easement do not restrict improvements by a benefited owner at their expense. Sorry for the typing error. Pat ----Original Message----- From: De-En Lang [mailto:deenlang@yahoo.com] sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 11:03 AM To: Dehkordi, Fereshteh CC: Simmons, Pat; Fanny Yee; Mike Harris SUbject: RE: Yee Short Plat L04S0065 "Dehkordl, Fereshteh" <Fereshteh.Dehkordl@METROKC.GOV> wrote: De-En: The easement Number according to Pat Simmon our platting engineer who reviewed the legal documents for this proposal is AF# 7110060608. A copy of this easement is needed to assure required improvements can be placed within the easement ROW. Pat can be reached at (206) 296-6636. Fereshteh --Original Message---- From: De-En Lang [mailto:deenlang@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 10:35 AM To: Harris, Mike CC: Curt Foster; fereshteh.dehkordl@metrokc.gov; Fanny Yee Subject: RE: Yee Short Plat L04S0065 I'm trying to get County to clarify this. De-En http://us.f547.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?box=Lang%20Assoc&Msgid=397 ... 7/18/2005 . ' . . "Harris, Mike" <Nllchael.Harrls@ctt.com> wrote: De-En, this is an incomplete recording number. I don't see anything close to that in our report and the recordings for 10/6/1971 don't go up that high. Mike Title Officer, Unit 10 Builder/Developer Unit 206 628-5623 fax 206 628-5657 e: michael.harris@ctt.com From: De-En Lang [mailto:deenlang@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 4:57 PM To: Mike Harris; Mike Harris subject: Fwd: Yee Short Plat L04S0065 Your order#OOl 144207. Mike could you get me a copy of AF 711006608 ? Thanks. De-En De-En Lang <deenlang@Jlahoo.com> wrote: Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:26:40 -0800 (PST) From: De-En Lang <deenlang@yahoo.com> Subject: Yee Short Plat L04S0065 To: Trishah Bull <trishah.bull@metrokc.gov> CC: Bruce Whittaker <bruce.whittaker@metrokc.gov>, Fanny Yee <fyee@nud.net>, Mike Luna <mikeluna.sadlerbarnard@earthlink.net> Trishah We couldn't find the following referenced easement on the survey map nor in the title report. Could you tell us where is this easement shown? Thanks. De-En c. Platting and Sun-ey requirements: 4. Please provide a copy of easement AF# 711006608 to show that it allows the required road improvement within the easement. http://us.f547.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?box=Lang%20Assoc&Msgid=397 ... 7/18/2005 II ' I STATUTORYWARRP.NTY oeeo 065 .. ·• v, <ii~ LAIID 1111.£ FiledtorRocDfdolRewos,tot ;~:·,::rr..N..:l COrAPANY . • •·~ Ml II Ml:I 51AT1ll Cl C)IJI NAME Mr. & Mrs. Gus J,. S.ake.larfs ADDRESS 1 l.6P1. :;.:11a CQola Rd .• I lt11SSPACE HUtRVfO •OM HtCOffDl!R'S US( '. . oo~©~ow~rcr ~Ir' . 1.0' ~: .. u-0. JUL 2 3 2005: \·\{). K.C. D.:D.E.S .. ~! ;-ORnrn IHI':~,:.· ~-¥"9 ~.,-,. . (,. Si; THEGRANTOR PHILIP"· YEE ANO FANNY Y. YEE, husband and wtfe, :,• RH:1··· . ·)' ,.:·ilnNS 10 ,-;n...,....,.,,00 o1 TEN DOLLARS ANO OTHER VALtlABLE CONSIDERATIONS •'~ ·~· inhond-.conv..,...,_,an.,,o GUS J; SAKELARIS AND OENA G. SAKELARIS, husband and w1fe, lht lollowingdelcrlbltd roal t11tate, situated in the County of IC.tng • St11t• of Wod\inoton: The llest 343.00 feet of Tract 6 of Northwestern~ Tracts, Dlvtston No. 5, as per plat thereof recorded In Voh,,111 47 of PJ , age 90, In King County, Wash1ngton; •· A~ 0 EXCEPT the North 73 feet of l!l!st 200 feet thereof; TOGETHER 111TH an eas t for tng,ess, egress, drainage and utilities over, under and across the South 30 feet of Tract 6; reserving to the grantors herein an easement for ingress. egress, dretnage and utfltt1es over. under and across the South 30 feet of the I/est 343. feet of Tract 6. Sttuate In the County of King, State of Washington. SUBJECT TO: That certain Deed of Trust 1n favor of Suburban Coastal Corp., dated· Ju"" 20, 1979, and recorded June 28, 1979, under Recording No. 790628-0192, which grantees contract, covenant and agree to assume and pay according to conditions the, eof and hold grantor here1n harmless therefl"Cffl; t Easemants. restrictions, reservations, covenants, conditions and c / public rights of record. I(' ~ '· STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF K1 ng On 1h11 ~ ~tondly appureg brfore mo ..----Phi 11 p M. Yee and Fanny Y. Yee incrton. midina ~bF Cofl\/l!Yance a -• mgton , .-:rax-a -~si. ::_,,.,,(Ii= I 0.00 § \,)• ~"'CtlUI P.t.. m:£1 = ~ . STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF ~~ ~~----- 18-, betonima, thlll undcmignod, • Naur, Public in and for thO Sblto of Wmhmgton, duly commb$iontd 4ll1CI swo,n, panonolly cppcauad __________ _ and; ____________ _ 10moknawntob0 thO --------• ond Socmcry, fospoetiNly, Of dlO corporation 1hDt oxccutOd Cbo fo,cgolng "*'umont. ONI adtnOWIOdpd tho ,old IMtfUffiCll'lt 10 b:1 lho lrtO and wolun- tcrv a:t ond cbOd ol ukl COl'l»OfOtion. for lho uaot ond pur· PoSCl lhoroln montioncld. and on oath statMt lhat _ ________ anhorind to oxocuto Iha uld Instrument and lhlt the sod offlxtd ii tho c:ot'POfUI w.t of acid corporation. Witnasl my hand and offlclcl .. o1 hontto ottlxod lho div ond VODI' tint cbow wrltton. Nogry Public in ond fOJ th• !hate of Washll'l(Jton, ,osk:tlng ··--------------- ~- i ; , r ' ' ' i i ' i I ' 1 ! r • • •·,u wiil ~) ' me Gtw 2 to\ s O 6 5ASENENT Nu: ~3-23-5@ & © & D w & OIREC • · o · ; <: ·· 1 Fl(fD F~R ~ PROJECT Alulla IJll. 11 11 '> -2...onn : FI ~I.Jl.PT"o·R, ·_ R.E"c'~•~t-J:,srr.r rnu :~,,!1J!!oursr OF T-re.y Semldd.u.~--rW5 j lt..LLE urw " REQUEST OF 4th .,ViNUE, SEA-, :C..."!'.wr KltlG f.OUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 58 ··. 111.£. WA se,2, 10828 3. E, 176TH ST, .RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 ~ i I E A S E ff E N T I{ t1) l s, ' INDENTURE: 'made this~ day of _·_:.Ju:.;1:::cY--'---------• ~ ! ~197a·, ~y and between° 0 1tING COUNTY l'IATER DISTRICT NO. 58, a municipal ~ TH[S .-corporation of King County, l:lashington, hettinafter termed the "Grantee", 0 and A.ff.ff. Inc. "' . ___ _;,;.;;;;.;=....;;;.;.;;.;.... ____________________ _ g--------------------• hereinafter termed the "Grantors" • .... lfITNESSl!TH: QI) ,.._ That the said Grantors for a v•luable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by the Grantee, does by these presents convey, · grant and 'tlGrrant unto the Grantee a perpetual easement for water 111ains and appurtenances under, through above, over and across the following described property situated in·ia:ng County, Washington, together with all after acquired title of the Granters herein, and iaore particularly · . . described as follows: · · · . The South 30 foot of Tract 6, HortbvQote~ Garden Tracta. D1vio1on s. accord1Dg to the plat recor4ac' 1D Volmce 47 of Plate. Pap 90. ta. Ung County, Vasbingcon .. -' ~··:·r.,~fis :;; ... :~w. '. ~,,--------·--·-------· , !Jet,ot'- 1 % EXCISl: TAX NOT REQUIRED · ~ Co. Records Division- 9'/ 9. t'iryf' , Ouput, The Granter warrants that their· title is free and clear of all encumbrances except: The Granter acknowledges that part of the consideration being paid by the Grantee ;_s for any and all damage resulting to or resulting hereafter from the possible interfe1ence of the natural flow of surface waters by Grantee's digging of pipe lines which may disturb the soil composition within said easement. j f I ; I I 1 I I l I I i ' ! ! ! i i I . ! .· .·in~.i'.\ ', • ' ;: ' \. ' I I ! ' \ ' I \ I I \ \ l I. .-. ., ,. . ; tSX ~.;P Tho said Grmtoo elulll hava tho right without prior inatltuttoo of &DJ' eu1t or proceed.lag at law, at auch timeo as my k neceosary • to enter upon tho eascm:aa.t for the purpose of cooatrucctng, repair1na, olterlng or racoutructlag aa.!d woter IIIG!a, or mattas 811)' connect1oua therew:Ltb, without IIICUl'Ting may logel. ob11Sot.loll OT llab111ty therefor, pt'o- vided that such caaotnacc.ias, ropalrlna, altor.lng or recoasnucttaa: of said water main Hha11 be accompl1ohN 111 ouch a. atllQQQ:r chat tho private taipnvec,aata ed.attng f.n thi.a . earK·meat ehall not bo di.aturbed or deocroyod, or 1D tbo GVOtlt r.bot thay are dlaturbed or de&troJ'ed, they vll1 be ropJ.acod in ao good a ccmdieloa aa they° von, lm:c::ld1ate1y before the property vaa encered upoo t-v the sold ~aateo. ne Graa.tor aball retata the rlgbt to uoo tho eurf11eo of tba eaMmoet if such use does ttot :later fen vith iastallat.:loa of tbe voU'l" coin. Hauovor, tho Orontot ahGJ.l oot erect buildlaga or otruc:ureo .. ou tho eaeoC'JJll.t duriag tho ad.stGr.lCO of aaf.d caaaaat. The eao.emaat, durl.aS its ·Cnd.atoa~, .ohall be a c:OVOIIGllt rUllll1Dfs vttb tho land and shall be bind1Dg on the aucceaoo:u. heirs• aa.d oostpo of both of thartiCIO hereto. IB WITNESS llllBIIIIOF, .., haw oot our baado aa4 oaa1o /? ~ day of July 19c.;78.=... ___ . ., .. .u11H111~· . .• fl • ,,~ .. .,... . C) N ., 00 j:: . . ... ·.. ._: ,-STATB:·OF IIASBIBllt!)l1) ~---·· •..•• : ......... ···_.•) 88 • WU11rr o~·'· > . J; 0a t~a1=:&7fu , • 192.L ~fare me peraonallJ' a.ppaarad ~nz~<l!d ~41'~ ...... -to be tt,,:,P•,4(4d: a,,.,.wf 4?1#d n~ of the corporaticm tha.t mracuted tho vtmin and foregoing luat~ admovloclgad said inatrua::ant to be the free and voluntary act and 'deed of oa1.d c;prporntion, fo:-tile uses and purpoeaa the.reia. mti.oQQ:d • aad on oath stated that ~ waa/vere authorized to e:amcute said f.U8trumaot: aod that the aeal affimed 1a ~ c.orporato aeal of aald corporation. . - IH IIItlll!SS llllBIIIIOP I bava bereuato set my hand aa4 affixed my official ool tho clAJ' and.year firot above written. Public in and for w: too. rea~ a ......... ~ .. 6*A***""*******************"******A'*-k**6*6'A"ft**~~· l. The considez:ation for this easement 1a v~ • 2. There a.o/ar:e not special conditions attached tO this eaaeaent. approved and recommended, Engineer. Dated •• , Attorney. ·nat~2.:;!a~~.S.?.,..C.,6).-------- 0F cot1MlSSI01188S OP IWIG Tha special conditions, if &DJ', and the c:c.asiderati.oo i,hlo and forogolag aaoornat are hereby approved and accepted th~a~day of • 19.7.:t,.at 4 rogulor open publi.c meeting of the Board of Commiaalone-rs of lCI VATEa DISTUCT Im. S8. B EASEMl!IIT NO. CORPOilATB ACKJIOIILl!DCBlll!NT ...... ,.··,·. ·".!.~-. ·~· .. ~t-:;::.~·~..:.:;_.: ~·~~-• .-·..,.,.~c-,-=--~·~---·--··· -·-.,. --~-· ....... , ....... --.. -· I ' ! i 1 t I 1 i I ' ' } ! ) ' """~ , J>qR. orDtw1opnm1..., En,0...,..,4111 scnoca •· ' I.and 11H S...1<a Dhuloa . HD013'11>"-~ Bcllrnot. W..iun,,,,,, '8006-14DO ·' Project No: . L 04:-S (?P ,1' t; Project ~ame: ft.£ :JH.~AT ?.td : Lang Associates, Inc. . ·. From: Land Use & Development Consultants To: ' N.E. Seattle, WA 98125 Fax (206) 362-6848 D Resubmittal O Peer review 0 LUSD review 'O Change order 0 Initial submittal 0 Resubmittal I 0 Additional informatio11; as requested by KC staff Please briefly d~scribe plan, information: · Revisions Submitted BEFORE Public Hearing )( Requested through screening 0 Requested by planner assigned to the plat JO Ap:Jlicant generated . Revisions AFTER Pu!>lic "{earing -· 0 Requested by LUSD staff Specify who.:___,..,--..,....._ D Required by condition of plat approval (i.e., staff report) . D Applicant generated Please briefly describe revision: . 1 '2:E.£ ,g.ps.q&41/7T&... L~ITU:. ' . • • I ·' \ June 22, 2005 The Ritz Trust Tina M Wal!=. Trustee 26422 2271h Ct SE Maple Valley, WA 98038 LETTER OF INTENT Re: Fleuve des Voiles, L04POOOi . To Whom It May Concern: ffeJ&@mowm JUL 2, 3 2005 w K.c. DD .. £.s The Ritz Trust owns the parcel known as tax lot 619900-0220 which is one of three parcels (most westerly) that compose the Fleuve des Voiles preliminary plat application. Ms. Fanny Y. and Philip M. Yee own the property adjacent to and west of the Ritz Trust property near its northern edge. The Soos Creek Water and Sewer District, in its Water Availability Certificate of June 17, 2005, indicates that development of the Fleuve des Voiles plat will require a connection to the existing stubbed out water line on the Yee's property. The Yees are desirous of allowing treated storm water to drain through the future Fleuve des Voiles storm system. The Ritz Trust and the Yees have agreed to the language of a -Mutual. Easemep.t Agreement (attached). It is the intention of the Ritz Trust to sign the Mutual Easement Agreement as soon as Fleuve des Voiles receives preliminary plat'approval from King County. Sincerely, The Ritz Trust .,./ ~ ~~'o!L~· Tina M Wa1ters . Trustee Encl. Mutual Easement Agreement ~· Lang Associates, Inc. Land Use and Development consultants 10658 Riviera Place N.E. •Seattle• Washington• 98125 • Tel: (206) 306-8880 • Fax: (206) 382-6848 July 20, 2005 L04S0065 Ms. Fereshteh Dehkordi, Senior Planner King County DDES-LUSD 900 Oaksdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055 ffel~!;o!g@ K.c. o.o.E.s. Re: Yee Short Plat-Responses to Notice of Request for Additional lnfonnation King County File No. L04S0065 ', Dear Fereshteh: It is so nice to work with you again. We are writing in response to your Notice of Request for Additional lnfonnation dated March 15, 2005 regarding the Subject Project. Our responses are enumerated similar to your original letter and are in bold. Original County comments appear in Italics. A. Access and Traffic: A power pole is located in the area where the new road is proposed. KCRS (Section 5. 11) requires 10 feet of clearance between the obstacle (power pole) and the edge of the travel lane (or 5.5 feet from the face of a vertical curb). Because of road improvement, the power pole must be relocated unless a variance from this requirement is granted. Acknowledged. We will take care of this during construction. B. Drainage. King County Surface Water Design Manual ISWDMI: 1. Drainage appears to leave the site in the foITTJ of sheet flow. A drainage conveyance system must be provided to convey concentrated runoff across the down-slope properties to an acceptab/e_disch[Lrg!zpo/nt. As proposed, this proposal will depend on the approval and construction of the proposed plat of Soos Creek, KC File L04P0002. Because of uncertainty regarding the completion and timing of the Soos Creek Plat, this proposal may have to be placed on hold until Soos Creek plat rec~ives a preliminary approval. Otherwise, an off-site conveyance system from the site to an f!Epropriate discharrze point together with appropriate easements across neighboring properties must be secured. Letters of intent from neighboring property owners indicating a willingness to grant easements are required. We have obtained letter of intent from abutting owner and contract purchaser of neighboring property for the exchange of easements. Please see attached letters. As suggested by Mr. Bruce Whittaker, We are also / Ms. Dehkordi July 20, 2005 Page 2 of2 --==-- orking with the pllcant of "Fleuve Des Voiles" to provide drainage discharge-co nectlon. 2. The property contains a wetland along the east property line and a storm drainage system running just off site along the northern property boundary. Dellneetlon of the 100 year flood plain for the wetland and drainage course Is required prior to preliminary approval. Our understanding Is that applicants of the subject short plat and Fleuve Des Voiles both Intent to alter the non-regulated wetland. Therefore,. rt delineation of the 100-year flood plain would no be useful. ..,___ () ~ / ~ . . . ~0G- c. Platting and Survey requirements: tJ!'-~-· 1. The contours must be based on a field survey per KCC 19A.08.150B.2. A statement to this effect must be shown on the site plan. A copy of the topographic survey certified by Mr. Dale Oaks, PLS (Certification No. 19635) was included in the initial submittal of the subject short plat We can submit another one if the map is misplaced. · 2. The site plan shows a fence and a shed encroachment along the south boundary of the site. This encroachment issue must be resolved prior to the final engineering plan approval. Please show how this encroachment will be resolved. 3. These encroachments are recent and do not have adverse possession rights. Ms. Yee had granted property owners temporary easement for the encroachments. Grantees are required to relocate the encroaching elements on demand (AF# 20041130000990 & 20041130000991 copies enclosed). As proposed, the recreation tract and the detention vault will be located within a 30-foot water main easement (recording No 7810020168). This easement must be relocated. A letter of agreement from the easement holder to allow relocation or relinquishment of the easement must be provided. Soos Creek Water & Sewer District does allow the use of the easement for vault and/or recreation spaces. The · 1c w1 nly use the south 1 O' of the easement and the detention facility (most likely a, detention tank) would fit within the remaining 20'. Letter from~is forth coming. Please provide a copy of easement AF# 711006608 to show that it allows the required road improvement within the easement. This item was clarified by Mr. Pat Simmons in his email dated 4/1/05 (attached). In addition, the Yees had reserved an easement when they sold the Tax Parcel 619900125 (AFN 8203220316 copy enclosed). .. , Ms. Dehkordi July 20, 2005 Page 3 of3 D. Recreation Tract The proposed combined drainage and recreation tract must allow for a full improvement of the recreation tract as an active recreation area together with landscaping and other related improvements. If other design constraints require the relocation of the vault, it will be preferable to locate the recreation tract where Lot 2 is proposed. The district has indicated that we can use the easement for recreation as long as nothing Is anchored to the ground. Letter from the District is forth coming. Enclosed Qlease fi ies of documents cited in this letter. We do not see the need to rev~ site planaftnis-Um . e are working withJhe applicant of Fleuve Des Voiles onJhe Co~ptual Drainage Plan. t will be submitted_aS-soon-as-they are revised. If you have any q · dditional information, please contact me at (206) 306- 8880 or email m . t deenlang@yaho~. :om -~''"'l..,, . ll!!l!'!=" ... , ,,' Enclosure Cc FannyYee February 9, 2005 Dept of Development & Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton WA 98055-1219 RE: Application L04S0065 Dear Sirs: We are 17-year property owners just south of this property and have several concerns: l. .96 acres is not an acre. Why is there an application for 6 homes? Our cul-de-sac is about 2.5 acres, and only 8 homes. We purchased property because of the view we have (for now) and the amount ofland that each homeowner owns. We dispute the necessity of 6 homes on this property. They will be too close together and they probably will be too large. 2. This property, along with ours, is on the hill on the west side above Soos Creek. We are concerned about the amount of water that flows underground all the properties in this area and the amount of potential pollution of Soos Creek. Although we are on the hill, we are not at the high point of the hill, and there can be a tremendous amount of water flow underground during a wet season. Topically, we've had some driveways flood/washout in past years; one home lost their basement to flooding several years ago. The property involved in this application does not have evergreen trees on it, which, we understand, means a higher water table. More houses, more water problems. On the south side of SEl92"d, we know ofa house that ended up with a "sink hole" in their front yard. They just happen to be east of a newer cul-de-sac with 25 homes in it. Isn't it possible the sink hole was caused by excess water flowing and being disturbed underground from the construction of all those homes? 3. The traffic congestion is getting worse. There is a new area tinder construction with 58 homes in it -IO feet between each house. Calculating 2 vehicles per house, and then counting all the applications in process in the one square mile around us, we're looking at probably 300 more vehicles and pollution from them on our roadways. Already, we find it is more difficult to get out on our major road from our cul-de-sac entrance. It used to be waiting for a car to go by; now it can be a dozen or more. Used to take just a minute, now can take 2-5 minutes or more! Other than Benson Road, all our roads are 2 lanes and can barely handle the traffic as it is. We don't want more lanes, we want less traffic! 4. And what about fire safety between homes? With only 10 feet between houses, how can a fire department properly protect the neighborhood? 5. Wir, have paid high property taxes in King County for this urban property we own for all these years, and we highly dispute what King County has done to our zoning rights. The last meeting we were notified of and attended, this area was zoned at one house per half acre. We have had no other notification, but it appears that somehow, these properties were changed to R6 zoning and those of us with more land highly disapprove of this dense construction that is being allowed. This particular application appears to indicate 6 homes per half acre? What kind of zoning is that? 6. We are NOT city dwellers. Ifwe had wanted to live close to our neighbors, we would have moved within the city limits! What about OUR property rights and OUR quality of life? We can understand people wanting to develop their land, but WHY does it have to be so dense? People want open space between their units, not just a tiny patch of green space on a comer of the property. In general, people have sized down their families; what happens to all these huge homes when they are no longer needed or wanted? We request that you reconsider the number of homes on this property, if the application itself cannot be denied. ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 March 15, 2005 De-En Lang Lang Associates Inc. 10658 Riviera Place NE Seattle, WA 98125 . RE: Notice of Request for Additional Information or Studies, KC File L04S0065 Date Filed: December 27, 2004 Date of Complete Application: January 17, 2004 Dear Mr. Lang: The purpose of this letter is to notify you pursuant to Ordinance 12196 that the Land Use Services Division is requesting additional information and/or studies to complete the review of your project. The information is described on the enclosed plat screening transmittal. When submitting the requested information, include a copy of the plat screening transmittal and retain a copy for your records. Provide a cover letter which lists how each item was addressed. Any clarification or explanation of the submittal can also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION ATTN: Fereshteh Dehkordi, Current Planning Section 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 If the submittal is hand delivered, submit it at the address above. Your application is on "hold" from the date of this notice, until the date you are advised that the. additional information satisfies this request, or 14 days after the date the information has been provided. You will be notified if the Division determines that the information is insufficient. Please note that the supplemental information required after vesting of a complete application shall not affect the validity of such application. The deadline for the submittal of the necessary information is, May 20, 2005. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist which may justify an extension of this date, you may submit such request, in writing, for consideration by this department. Failure to meet the deadline shall be cause for the Department to cancel or deny the application. If you have any questions regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project/Program Manager Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division cc: Fanny & Philip Yee Curt Foster, Senior Engineer; Engineering Review Section, Land Use Services Division Application File 'l King County ShortPlat Screening Transrt 11 LUSD File No. L04S0065 Date of:lnformation.Request: May 1,5, 2005' Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division Deadline for Submittal of Information: May 20, 2005 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 A. B. C. Access and Traffic: A power pole is located in the area where the new road is proposed. KCRS (Section 5.11) requires 10 feet of clearance between the obstacle (power pole) and the edge of the travel lane (or 5.5 feet from the face of a vertical curb). Because of road improvement, the power pole must be relocated unless a variance from this requirement is granted. Drainage, King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM): 1. Drainage appears to leave the site in the form of sheet flow. A drainage conveyance system must be provided to convey concentrated runoff across the down-slope properties to an acceptable discharge point. As proposed, this ro osal will depend on the approval and construction of the proposed plat of Soos Creek, KC File L04P0002. Because of uncertainty regarding the completion and timing of the Soos Creek Plat, this proposal may have to be placed on hold until the Soos Creek plat receives a preliminary approval. Otherwise, an off-site conveyance system from the site to an ap!J!:2priafediscfiarge point together with-appropriate easements across neighboring properties must be secured. Letters of intent from neighboring property owners indicating a willingness to grant easements are reqtJi-ed. 2. The property contains a wetland along the east property line and a storm drainage system running just off site along the northern property boundary. Delineation of the _l OQ_ year_f1,0_9_g__pjaiE_for the wetland and drainage course is required prior to preliminary approval. Platting and Survey requirements: 1. The contours must be based on a field survey per KCC l 9A.08. I 50B.2. A statement to this effect must be shown on the site plan. 2. The site plan shows a fence and a shed encroachment along the south boundary of the site. This encroachment issue must be resolved prior to the final engineering plan approval. Please show how this encroachment will be resolved. 3. As proposed, the recreation tract and the detention vault will be located within a 30-foot water main easement (recording No 7810020168). This easement must be relocated. A letter of agreement from the easement holder to allow relocati~n or relinquishment of the easement must be provided. 4. Please provide a copy of easement AF# 711006608 to show that it allows the required road improvement within the easement . . scr LF/PlatSCR.Sub 2/24/98 clc D. Recreation Tract. The proposed combined drainage and recreation tract must allow for a full improvement of the recreation tract as an active recreation area together with landscaping and other related improvements. If other design constraints require the relocation of the vault, it will be preferable to locate the recreation tract where Lot 2 is proposed. Please provide the following by May 20, 2005: I. Four copies of a conceptual drainage plan to show how the runoff from the development will be discharged. 2. Letter of intent from the adjacent property owners granting easement for drainage discharge across their properties. 3. A copy of the easement language for AF# 7110060608. 4. Ten copies ofa revised site plan if revision is made . . scr LF/PlatSCR.Sub 2/24/98. clc ' ; ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 May 26, 2005 De-En Lang Lang Associates Inc. 10658 Rivera Place NE Seattle, WA 98125 RE: Application for the Preliminary Yee Short Plat DDES File No. L04S0065 Dear Mr. Lang: Thank you for your request for an extension of the deadline for the submittal of the additional information required to process the above referred preliminary short plat application. · The request for additional information stops all processing of the plat application until the required information is received. The time spent waiting for information to be submitted is not counted toward any time limit requirements of the plat application process. The March 15, 2005 letter provided a deadline of May 15, 2005 for the submittal of the requested information. We are granting an extension to this deadline. If the Land Use Services Division of DDES does not receive the necessary information requested to process your application by July 29, 2005, your application may be canceled or denied. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, r~~f)a.L.~ Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division Cc: Curt Foster, Engineer, Engineering Review Section Planning File Foster, Curt From: De-En Lang [deenlang@yahoo.com) Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 10:35 AM To: Harris, Mike Cc: Curt Foster; fereshteh.dehkordi@metrokc.gov; Fanny Yee Subject: RE: Yee Short Plat L04S0065 I'm trying to get County to clarify this. De-En "Harris, Mike" <Mic/1ael.Harris@ctt.com> wrote: Page I of I De-En, this is an incomplete recording number. I don't see anything close to that in our report and the recordings for 10/6/1971 don't go up that high. Mike Title Officer, Unit 10 Builder/Developer Unit 206 628-5623 fax 206 628-5657 e: michael.harris@ctt.com From: De-En Lang [mailto:deenlang@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 4:57 PM To: Mike Harris; Mike Harris Subject: Fwd: Yee Short Plat L0450065 Your order #001144207. Mike could you get me a copy of AF 711006608? Thanks. De-En De-En Lang <deenlang@yahoo.com> wrote: Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:26:40 -0800 (PST) From: De-En Lang <deenlang@yahoo.com> Subject: Yee Short Plat L04S0065 To: Trishah Bull <trishah.bull@metrokc.gov> CC: Bruce Whittaker <bruce.whittaker@metrokc.gov>, Fanny Yee <fyee@nud.net>, Mike Luna <mikeluna.sadlerbarnard@earthlink.net> Trishah We couldn't find the following referenced easement on the survey map nor in the title report. Could you tell us where is this easement shown? Thanks. De-En c. Platting_and SurveyJequirements: 4. Please provide a copy of easement AF# 711006608 to show that it allows the required road improvement within the easement. 04/01/2005 February 24, 2005 Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdal~ Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 RE: File No. L04S0065 Dear F ereshteh, Brenda and Ken Bulen 19007 120th Ave SE Renton, WA 98058 Thank you very much for speaking with me about my many issues regarding this project. The following are a list of my concerns: I. The reference to relevant environmental documents is checked "Not applicable". The area under proposed development has previously failed a water percolation test, hence the need for sewer, and the parcel to the North floods during heavy rain. I am concerned that environmental impacts may not be entirely investigated. Is this true? 2. I am concerned about the ensuing removal of trees and the impact, plus the type and location of replacement trees. 3. I need to know how the impact of the slope and grading will affect my property. 4. I would like to know more about the location of sidewalk improvements and/or streetlights, and postal delivery impact. 5. I am concerned about traffic patterns. Please keep me informed about any developments regarding my outstanding issues. I can be reached at 425-235-4540, should you have any questions. Thank you very much. Sincerely, #z,yJ,~e#'- Brenda Bulen Parcel ID # 6199000125 • .. Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC AOA PO Box 578 Carnation, WA 98014 Office ( 425) 333-4535 Fax (425) 333-4509 Environmental Planning & Landscape Architecture December 22, 2004 Fanny Yee c/o Lang Associates, Inc. 10658 Riviera Place NE Seattle, WA 98125 Attn: De-En Lang SUBJECT: Wetland Delineation for Yee Property, King County (Parcel #s 61990000126 and -0127) Dear De-En: AOA-1984 On May 19, 2004 I conducted a wetland reconnaissance on the 0.96-acre subject property located east of 1201h Ave. SE in the vicinity of SE 1901h Street in King County, WA. The site is undeveloped and consists primarily of an upland deciduous forest. Topography on the site gnerally slopes gently down from west to east. One small wetland (Wetland A) was identified along the eastern property boundary (Figure 1) and was delineated utilizing the methodology outlined in the 1997 Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Wetland A consists of a small (175 s.f. on-site) isolated shallow tcipographic depression that extends slightly off-site to the east. Vegetation within the on-site portion of the wetland was generally sparse and consisted primarily of one small black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) and one small Oregon ash (Fraxinus /atifolia). The remainder of the wetland consisted of surface stained duff, indicating early seasonal ponding. , Hydrology within the wetland was assumed during the field investigations based oi!:thez,, presence of hydric soils. i7 f (/} /t Attachment A contains data sheets prepared for a representative location in both tlie'h f /]f If:> upland and wetland. These data sheets document the vegetation, soils, and A ..... ,? ;, la !!;,, hydrology information that aided in the wetland boundary determination. r.c: D u'¢ VI ·D ~ Wetland A has been determined to be unregulated by King County as part of their '"·S: review of the project site to the east (King County #L04P002). As delineated by H & S Consulting and described in their Wetland Evaluation and Delineation Report ( dated May 26, 2004), the total wetland area is well below the 2,500 s.f. threshold size for isolated wetlands within the urban area. Under the current King County code, isolated , ... io· EASEM£.'11" FOO INGRESS, EGRESS, l\tol.O UTIUTIES , ~Ee: NO. 6J94i01 ( ,£E.,t(t)P6'P) ---S-43.00' ·- R- L£G8'1C '<l POWER PC! E 0 8lllUR!) M WAlfR lA,Vf. 619900005ll flS-jl-50 -6199000210 RS-6•50 / ~~ ,,1"·'/. ,, , '• .. Houoo ,, t H~ I ', .,,,, '·•,',' ·'/, ·.: ,::' lP-( 6199000220 RS-6-50 ,F<J'-'<0 2• IRCN PIPE :,,• WAT!ll ~AJN EAS0191T REC. NO. 7810020168 De-En Lang December 22, 2004 Page 2 wetlands within the urban growth area are not subject to the County's critical areas ordinance. If you have any questions regarding the wetland delineation, please give me a call. Sincerely, attachment -.:---·....:...:.' ;,~:·~-:---· ·-· :,--·,:-·, ., .:, ,-~ --..• ----....... ' '.: .... --·· ,:<-,,.,., .$.¥'" .. ) --· 8-2 DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD1 Fiold lnvest>;i~ivtt AvrtM A,J,J Dale: _s-:::,----'-~"--o__,'f ___ _ ProjecVSno: -. · State: 1,-1.~ County: _f,<-._.,__, :.:N:_0,e·c__ ____ _ Applican\/Owner: l-P.. ,J b Plant Community #/Name:------------ Note: tt a morn de!ailod sile description is necessary, use the back or data form or a field notebook. '-------------------------------------------------- Do normal enVironmenta! conditions exist at the plant community? Yes ...:i,_ No __ (If no, explain on back) Has the VE>IJelalion, soils, and/or hydrology bean significantly disturbed? Yos __ No~ (If yes, explain on back) --------------------------------------------------- Dominan\ Plant Species 1. f-rt.,,...,.;t\,/_. \c,_..\~~ .. 1\6, 2. :J'o?~l .,•, ~. c.l..'->! .,/?'• 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. VEGETATION fndicalor Status Stratum (A(vl .- f.Ac. ::r Dominan\ Plant Species 11. ----------- 12. ----------- 13. ---------~ 14. ---------~ 15. ---------~ 16. ---------~ 17. ---------~ 18. ---------~ 19. ---------~ 20.---------- Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC IQ(, <i.·c, rs tho hydrophytic vegetation crnorion mo!? Yes~ No __ lndicalor Status Stra\um Ralionale: ---~-------------------------------- 7 S:o"&-fAc... e,,t ... 1,..11:.5-rf,<-- SOILS Series/phase: -----------------Subgroup:2 ------------- Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes __ No Undetermined------- Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No~ Histic epipedon present? Yes __ No~ rs the soil: Mottfed? Yes,_:t___ No __ Gleyed? Yes__ No L-- Matrix Cofor: I Ol' /2. 3 !'.J,,c___ Mottle Cofors: _Ji£.!CAl.!a..=:!.., <>~·~-',;,_ ___________ _ Other hydric soil indicalors: ------------------------------ Is Iha hydric soil crilerion me!? Yes i_ No Ralionale: -----,---,--~--~-----,-----c:------------------ CHC-•·""-A ~ (-l... v-l, 1 \'I M CT1\ .. f;; 5 HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundaied? Yes No~ Surface water depth: Is the soil sa\urated? Yes No )(. Depth to Jree-s\anding waler in pit/soil probe hole:---------------------- List other field evidence of suriace inundation or soil saturation. Is the welland hydrology crilerion met? Yes~ No __ Ralionale: ~--------~--------~--------~--------&/LfAct. s.i,.,...,,..iG-(:'-'ll)Eo,-JC(;.._ C.\'.-Sf:AS<>;.;A<. p.,-,D,...iG JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the pfant community a we\land? Yes ..x__ No Rationale for·jurisdictional decision: ALL 3 C.!2.11'/z/CIA .... ~-;- 1 This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and ihe,Plant_Communny Assessment Procedure. 2 Classttica1ion according lo "Soil Taxonomy." C . --·· .. '-< ~.'·'' ···-... :.:· . ___ . ·. --·-. ------·-I \ • ,·, .. ....... -.~-, ••• :.-.., ..... + ·······---:_._ . -····----,', ·.· · .. · ' _______ ., ___ . ~,.,.· : ' , ' \ ·_..,j ; ~, 8-2 ,?#7_._·· .. DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD1 Field lnvest>;iatDr(s): Ac TM 1-,,.J .,J Date: __ s~· ---l~"i~--:-c~Y ___ _ ProjecVSne: r_i:.(; Slale: 1,JA County: _.,_1<:._,_1,_,-J'-0"','------ Applicant!Owner: LA,.J lz Plant Community #/Name:------,------ Note: tt a more detailed site descrip:ion is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook. D~ normal enVironmental conditions exist at the plant communrty? Yes .::£_No __ (If no, explain on back) Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes __ No 2!,,_ (If yes, explain on back) Dominant Plant Species 1. 2. 3, 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Yc.\'fs~;.,.1 ....... 1-tv1v'"'1·\ ... '""' ~ ..{.4 yrs,·--v S Indicator Status f'AC.. fAC0 f l',C v N '- f~C- 'ft!, J f~C!id f .>,.( .. } VEGETATION Stratum Dominant Plant Species T 11. s 12. 2 13. 5. 14. + 15. 16. V 17. •t 18. 19. 20. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC ·" 13 're. Indicator Status Stratum Is the hydrophylic vegetation crnerion met? Yes __ No ..x.._ Rationale:---------------~--------------------He T "> Jc.. ~·~-'VA "-c !L V'-.J ~ ... "1 -r .;_ IL- SOILS Series/phase: -----------------Subgroup:2 ------------- Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined------- Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No~ Histic epipedon present? Yes __ No _x__ Is the soil: Monled? Yes No K..__ Gleyed? Yes__ No __;i!;..._ Matrix Color: lo'i fl. '-{:r;-Mottle Colors:----------------- Other hydric soil indicators:------------------------------ ls the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No.x_ Rationale:------------------~-----------------C til...,,._A ol'-'l W<'.(<)<·CI -"'<"~GS: HYDROLOGY Is the ground surtace inundated? Yes__ No L Surface water depth: ----------- Is the soil saturated? Yes__ No .)5__ Depth to free-standing water in piVsoil probe hole:---------------------- List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation. ls the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes__ No~ Rationale:-----------------------------~------/JC. o~s,::.12"'~1,.:.,-> otL E."'1Dc,-..1c~ ~'r-" r..i:'-s"'T'v(l.-A{1 ... .J c,,_ ?(;.,rJ~, N0 JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No~ Rationale for'jurisdictional decision: ---------------------------c!O C. .. ' "tlcf': I ... 'M i; .... 1-This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the.Plant Communny Assessment Procedure. · ' 2 Classnication according to "Soil Taxonomy." C m&~ . l · Consulting WIEl"ILAINJ[Jl IEVAIL.lUJA l"~OINI AINID [J)IEIL~INIIEA l"~ON. IRIEiPOIRl" SOOS CREEK PlA T PROJECT SITE King County, Waslhongton Section 33, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.il/l. prepared for Boston Design and Development . 13425 E. Lie. Kathleen Dr. SE · Renton, WA 98059 prepared by H & 5 Consulting P.O. BolC 731695 Puyallup, WA 98373 253 732-6515 mheckert@qweslnet May 26, 2004 K.C. O.D.E.S. • LfAf'd)O)---. P. 0. Box 731695 • Puyallup WA 98373 (253)732-6515 mheckert@qwest.net (360) 893-6779 EXECUTIVE SUi\/li\/lARY The Soos Creek Plat Project Site is approximately 7.26 acres in total size and located to the east of the · City of Renton, King County, Washington. The project site is comprised of three parcels; ( Parcel # 6199000220, 6199000240, 6199000260). The project site is dominated by mature and sub-mature forest, with single-family residences, managed and maintained lawns, and unmanaged portions. Onsite assessment of the project site following the procedures outlined in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. (Wash. Manual) and the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987 Manual) resulted in the identification of two areas that exhibited hydric soils, wetland hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation consistent with the established criteria of both the Wash. and 1987 Manuals. This assessment, completed in accordance with King County regulations, included an evaluation of the function and value rating for the identified wetlands, a classification of the wetland following the U.S. Fish and Wildlife methods, and an identification of the standard King County buffer width required for these wetlands. · WETLAND SIZE CLASSIFICATION KING FUNCTION STANDARD ONSITE (USFWS) COUNTY AND VALUE BUFFER WIDTH (square RATING RATING feet) A Offsite -PFOE 1 High 100 ft. Buffer onsite B *998 PSSC 3 non-Low Not regulated reaulated *connotes wetland continues off-site PFOE palustrine, emergent, seasonally flooded PSSC palustrine, shrub-scrub, seasonally flooded/saturated . The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and King County, as well as a number of other local, state, and federal agencies, regulate activities in and . around identified wetland and drainage corridor areas. Such regulations focus on the avoidance of adverse impacts to wetlands, streams, associated buffers and the mitigation of such impacts that cannot be avoided. King County has established criteria to categorize wetlands for purposes of regulation and the establishment of buffers. In addition, King County allows a limited amount of alterations to wetlands (i.e. isolated wetlands, roadway crossings) provided such impacts are mitigated pursuant to an approved mitigation plan. The Selected Action Plari of the Soos Creek Plat project site focuses on the creation of independent lots suitable for the development of single-family homesites consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan. . . I • ® King County Road Services Division Department of Transportation 201 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104-3856 May 6, 2004 De-En Lang Lang Associates, Inc. ;., I 0658 Riviera Place NE Seattle, WA 98125 RE: Transportation Concurrency Exemption -File #04-04-28-0 I, Parcels 6199000-126, 127 Dear Mr. Lang: Thank you for your April 28, 2004, application for a Certificate of Transportation Concurrency. The King Couniy Department of Transportation has determined that a Certificate of Transportation Concurrency is not needed for your project. As of March 12, 2001, according to King County Code, Section 14.70.15.A2, any short subdivision within the urban growth area is exempt from Transportation Concurrency. This letter does not guarantee a development permit. Please take this letter with you to the Department of Development and Environmental Services at 900 Oaksdale Avenue SW in Renton when you apply for your development permit. If you should have any questions, please contact Rebecca Campeau, Transportation Planner, at (206) 263-4722 or rebecca.campeau@metrokc.gov. Sincerely, ·,;? -. ! l.'.>';;;,y<<2:;,),--,0\ .· ;.:_. -- Linda Dougherty (_) Director LD:RW:lc cc: Phillip & Fanny Yee, Property Owner Rebecca Campeau, Transportation Planner fa ~ ~--I~ U v7 [E rro·) D.:.r... 2 7 ZOD4 /l !J K.c. o.o.::::.s. ® King CoWlty Department ol Dev~oP!ll•llt and Envlronn1en).al Services Land Un se,vh:<ts DIVl<;lon llO(J Oakeadale Avenue S0u1hwoot Ront,)n, W•#:9t::~219 I[}. I[\\ 21'J6.m.ea~~ -112?1 "(fjj \(Ji t('O 5 File No. &;j) -~ _ ,::w;;rr,-·.,,-;~;r-·-·c,,,,l,mF~·---:···•:irc· .. -···1:r~i¥-····-1 ¥!"11"· ~lfr" rt 'i!,t' t A'iff'rcr l , .. , ·, r11I , . ,~,J •--tr~Jl ·., 1! . •~r,:1:!p '; Alternative formats avail~ble upon request / &'tre1:t Cit; Zip Phrne .... Fannv&PhilioYee 11431-23~1h§t. __ ·-·vyo~dwav. WA 98020 42$398-4406 Au•nro Na,oe s11 ... 1 City Zip Pl~'n• ; Lana Associates. Inc. 10658 Riviera Pl NE. Seattle. WA 98125 206 306-8880 i I ~;~~;Lo;~~ ;;:~;w . ··--·······-·-············-········-···················· 0~~6 ";;;;::~ 41, 935 sa-ft) ····•·· 06°1 Lois . . I r~E: ~~ ~~ I~; rR 5Er·;-··~:~•~;;;~1~~~:~:-~;~·~·:·~:: of', T~~;~~~~~-26 4 0127 -··) ···--············'··-····-'··-·· '-'-··--' lats,Pa9e 90, KC Record Except W 343 ··············································---·--·-· y me is true and ccnect to •~• be5I of mt i<nov.1edge. Slgn,iture -Owner · .... ~~·······-········-·-··-··-/z .... -::_!...J. .. :::-.: .. ~···--· ..... ~."""IM"~·~·""'~ ... W-... A· ... ~··u•~oo NOT VJRITE: BELOW THIS UNI: -~·-··,._ ............ ,u, .. ,,..., ... / Otiur TE!thniclan: Krt13; _,........................................... Zur.i~: Min. i..ol t\rea ·-· .. ·-···--Rii::S.11icli<ma: ------ Min. Loi \J'./idlh ···················-··················-··------ Conmiur,ity ?1anni"9 Atea. -------····-··················-- Co'mptohtraive Plafi Dttslgnatlr;u: ......... ·-····--··--·- Shot~lines: .. ..-,-Err,. Sensltl'/e Ar0,1$ t..Wp t.10.. . .•......•. _ ............ -· .............................. -~ Landslide Fl<rodplain F,!oti Beari119 W.lla1\0l --Erosion ............. C<1al M•"" SelMllo =::: Sleep Slope streal'¥\S, Clam: ·-·····--···--······--·--···-············---- CrUical Otai11age Bas:n: .............................. -,.·-··-·-····-····-·······- SWM Variance Requosl•d? ···········································-··- C!P Pro)ocl7 ·········-··· . ····-·····-························-·················- liir, Raw U.. Pennit R•quilod'I ··----------- Slreo! ································--·······-·························-····-.... I ~EF.S I ............................................... l·····························- s,ate HighW>)'? Yes ..•....•.•.•. Ho ••.•.•.•..•• I -···-···--··-··------+i--- 1 ! -···········-····-·-------+-i City urn,uoo? / I i I i -i Yoa __J_ No I -,::_::_:.,.:-:::,..·:,..:.,.·:,=:-,j:,,..".,..:_·._r:_? __ :~--~=t .. : .. :::::::: ............... . Forest rn,t. AG ms, I .. I I I i Cl? P1<>)dct? ................................................................................. I RfLl\TEO FIL~$; • StiN'oUNe AMa vamnco Ro~med? ....................... ___ ._ c«uflCllio of Sewer A<allablllty R•q"ired? Hea1U1 Oeparlmenl App1o~ai Required? ······--·············-····-····- SEl'A Requilod·I --························-·······-(SA. 2,~1G,P.B.) PIO-Of or l.eg!ll Lo! R•IJ"~•d? Olher: -------·····-····················-···-······· i ! i j I ! ! i I IT5J ~ [: ~ ~ ~f rE [LJI lfl} D :c 2 7 2004 K. r· D.D.E.S. C/1eck out tile ODES Web site at WVM.metrokc.govlddes I F'u£)e 1 of 2