The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMisc 4' ; i ~ :;::;:;, '.°g ' "' NOTE: APPROXIMATELY 1.8 ACRE OF INDOOR AND/OR OUTDOOR AREA FOR ACTIVE RECREATION SHALL BE DEVELOPED ON THE PLAZA/PATIO DECKS DURING FINAL DESIGN DEVELOPMENT L,1,rf" L.. W,1Slf1,1,: C -,.. G,o,v °?, ~ 1:-\ %~ ~ ,','\. 0 "' 'o ~ ~ ~ ~~ . °'<OY °'.::. 1-~ 1:-t < -r ~~. o' Q>,!.. ~ \-~ ) ~? q, > <';..~ " ~(:¥ \y-'=!":' "·'"' I '"!; i~ \> I J )0 -----•--..l "' (; , r·"!.".~~"'~-i' --.. ,"'--, "\ It·.'.. .-"'" 1 ,,,,,:... I ~ l.... . / ,,,ces ,O _..-, \ -~ --'------=~"'--=-~---;:~-;~~( ~~-----=-----~ --~c:::, -""--- \ .,---~---20 FR= LA$-~1't~~_!_':'.-.::n:-_:-SITE & BUILDING SUMMARY BUILDING CODE: 2009 IBC SITE ZONING: COR POST DEVELOPMENT ACREAGES BUILT AREA (IMPERVIOUS AREA) BUILDING AREAS = BUILDING AREAS = 187,350sf PARKING DECK AREAS= 59,000sf PARKING DECK LANDSCAPE AREAS= 25,000sf COURTYARD PLAZAS= 117 ,600sf COURTYARD MISC. DECKS"' 4,026sf TOTAL BUILDING AREAS= 392,976sf PAVED AREAS {R.O.W., ROADS, PEDESTRIAN/Bl KE PATHS)= STREET 'A', 'B' & 'C' AREAS= 99,250sf STREETS 'D' & 'E' AREAS= 23,522sf SIDEWALK AREA= 60,SOOsf TOTAL PAVED AREAS= 183,572sf SURFACE PARKING AREAS~ 89,000sf TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREAS= 665,548sf PERVIOUS AREA OCCUPANCY ITPE: M & R-2 \ ~-'<"'"·:=::-/!.: -:-"'" .-<Cc~~:~----0~~~-:: ...... ~ /\ SFF f'1 J OR or" ~ ~--7 ~--- C(J~F.>.CF PARK NS "--- --f--=~11'!\1 ~~IJS_ ~~II u c J ~---:f 1 ~·~-~~T3~~ CONSTRUCTION TYPE: I & VA -SPRINKLERED MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT: 10 STORIES OR 125' \ \-? DESIGNATED NATURAL/OPEN SPACE AREA= 140,33Bsf UNPAVED FIRE LANE/PEDESTRIAN TRAIL= 19,970sf STREET LEVEL LANDSCAPED AREAS = 15,300sf TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS AREA SW 1 RESIDENTIAL (5 FLOORS & 7.1 UNITS) -78,iOOsf SW 2 RESIDENTIAL (5 FLOORS & 80 UNITS) -88,000sf SW J RESIDENTIAL (4 FLOORS & 64 UNITS) -70.400st SW 4 RESIDENTIAL [3 FLOORS &42 UNITS)-78,iOOsf NW 1 RESIDENTIAL (5 FLOORS & 71 UNITS) -46,200sf NW 2 RESIDENTIAL (4 FLOORS & 56 UNITS) -61,600sf SE 1 RESIDENTIAL (5 FLOORS & 82 UNITS)• 78,1.00sf SE 2 RESIDENTIAL (4 FLOORS & n UNITS) -79,20Dsf NE 1 RESIDENTIAL (5 FLOORS & 82 UNITS)• 78,100sf NE 2 RESIDENTIAL (4 FLOORS & 72 UNITS)-79,200sf TOTAL BUILDING AREAS -737,000sf TOTAL RESTAURANT AREA -9,000sf TOTAL RETAIL AREA -20,025sf TOTAL PARKING AREA SW LOWER PARKING LEVEL -125,180sf NW LOWER PARKING LEVEL -41.,SOOsf SE LOWER PARKING LEVEL-114,870sf NE LOWER PARKING LEVEL -75,490sf TOTAL LOWER PARKING LEVEL AREAS -357,J40sf TOTAL ENCLOSED AREA~ 1,123,365sf STRUCTURAL RESIDENTIAL COURTYARDS -H7,600sf STRUCTURAL OPEN PARKING DECKS -84~000sf ' '\ .. FA. ~ ON *I'' ,.,., I~""'~. '"" ~ i'2 i .J.~ ~; '¥ §~.,,~ a::gi~ <'!..JC,::, ~~"' so= J C )ol= nL ,-/ ~ ' ' OTHER LANDSCAPED AREAS= 33,495sf LOT 7 SATELLITE PROPERTY= 50,725sf TOTAL PERVIOUS AREAS= 259,828sf UNIT SUMMARY SW RESIDENTIAL TOTAL UNITS= 257 NW RESIDENTIAL TOTAL UNITS= 127 SE RESIDENTIAL TOTAL UNITS= 154 NE RESIDENTIAL TOTAL UNITS= 154 r--"-TOTAL UNITS= 692 11 J DECK PARKING, ij j~ SE QUADRANT= 130 DECK PARKING STALLS TOTAL AREA~ 1,324,965sf LAND AREAS GROSS SITE AREA-925,376sf NATURAL PUBLIC OPEN SPACES: NATURAL AREAS ALONG SHORELINE TRAIL• 140,338sf SHORELINE FIRE LANE/PEDESTRIAN TRAIL 19,970sf SUB TOTAL -160,308sf JL_·_ ---·-·-+.l:-W-S-fReE:,..,c,.:-.---·-·-'?c- _ ~,, ~ NE QUADRANT= 39 DECK PARKING STALLS ~ I ' • ~ TOTAL DECK PARKING= 169 STALLS " .. eecernw ""' ,me srncc·../ -------s,~---••,, _ .; __ )_ ::::---...~~:;J LEGEND OTHER AREAS· STREET LEVEL -122,772sf (EXCLUDES SIDEWALKS & LANDSCAPE) LANDSCAPED COURTYARDS -117,600sf SIDEWALKS SIDEWALKS IN PUBLIC R.O.W. -36,BOOsf SIDEWALKS NOT IN PUBLIC R.O.W. -24,000sf PAVED PARKING AREAS DECK PARKING AREA -84,000sf (INCLUDES SIDEWALKS & LANDSCAPE) c ,.q /.'( r-------------' ~----L~LV.1:J" ~l·JLWA.L~ ----'· YI!;' ·-.• SURFACE PARKING AREA• 89.000 COURTYARD MISC. DECKS -4,026sf LANDSCAPE AREAS STREET LEVEL LANDSCAPE• 15,300sf OTHER LANDSCAPE AREAS • J3,495sf LOT 7 SATELLITE PROPERTY• 50}25sf SUB TOTAL AREA"" 738,026sf BUILDING GROUND COVER -187,350sf TOTAL AREA~ 92S,376sf LEGEND --~·,S1-111vr,---··:---.., _____________ u r 0111 _ OHWM ' lQ/ ''-. 50'WETLANDSETBACK ~-~--~------~ \ 100' OHWN SETBACK _, ---..._ --~ WETLAND EDGE C EXIS IING Pf/(JI Lil I'; LI Ne FXISTl~G 3NRR G' BIKE LA.NC: ~ G " / / GRA:~IIIC SCALl ; 6C! SC~L[· 1· -6C" VD C: ' r l __ ' --1 ---' \ 1:- "" ~ ?(:¥ / C§'.J DUMPSTER/ RECYCLE BIN [-~ -E] UTILITY AND ELECTRICAL SPACE ~""l EXIT STAIR [§j LOBBY AREA PROPERTY LINE LOT 7 50,725sf -i't'. PR?;p-t"itr>Ci/"1;-,.-\. .. __ -------...:::........._ "'"'"'" ,,cr--~~\l __ _ QUENDALL TERMINALS -PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE RENTON, WASHINGTON CENTURY PACIFIC, LLLP 1,rlt'' i.?~:~.! liFs' I, ~~;i, <~f, i~j~ii;i ., •.. 1.1. I " " ' i( ~ •" ~ -~ • ·1 < . if~1tf, }i ~1,.~i ~II [!J:'F·· B-1' I L--, .. -' ,~~N~~J \ _--.... _ Ul _J <( z --C' z ~ 2u ~ c-~ 0:::: ~ u w IL, ~ U) L, ~? _J . > _J 6 rY !---· <( 7 ":;; w •'--Ou::~ z w =:, 0 b b • w < ,..: 0 ~o <t • • o' < Ww °' °' • w• LL.i j Ww . " ~ " ~ . ~ ' ' . . ' ,,I ~ 8: ~_). ~ I I~ 0 j z • 0 z < • <t " < ~· ----·- 0... shed ~ PO.O VJ ' ' '--a I e ~ Q 7 \~ LEGEND OHWM 50' WETLAND SETBACK iOO' OHWN SETBACK WETLAND EDGE I 5~.!\'i.:1.__-~: rFJ45----.._ _ I _,,r ---..__ -'-- ~ "" '<> "o-,, \ I /.,qi('° W,4Sff11\1Grol\l ~ \ .) 9'. \ ) c> <;; '% ;.;.~. " '? """ <'-" q, 0 "" ~ '?, ~ " i ~~ t ~" "o-\ 0 / \ I I ---~O~~,~~BA~----- 1 L=~-~~~l~~---- -----' \ ' --1,J~I I icfffi., /¢1~ PARKING SUMMARY ="F -~ + =f= ___ t : t-t ' t+ "+' I.ct cs, • . ---j ± + rv 1 n':~ 10' : 1-J' "" ... - i ' - ' ' .---- LIJJJI!! I .. - I •• •• iil P, G J ~ ' I\JI ~ tll ~ _, i Lr, r h "I! !iJli ~/ P-iCOVERED GARAGE PARKING: SW QUADRANT= 34 7 PARKING STALLS NW QUADRANT= 95 PARKING STALLS SE QUADRANT-318 PARKING STALLS NE QUADRANT-206 PARKING STALLS TOTAL P-1 PARKING= 966 STALLS SURFACE PARKING: SW QUADRANT= 151 SURFACE PARKING STALLS SE QUADRANT= 42 SURFACE PARKING STALLS NW QUADRANT= 38 SURFACE PARKING STALLS TOTAL SURFACE PARKING -231 STALLS DECK PARKING SHOWN ON SHEET PO.O: SE QUADRANT= 130 DECK PARKING STALLS NE QUADRANT= 39 DECK PARKING STALLS TOTAL DECK PARKING -169 STALLS RESTAURANT (9,000 sf) REQUIRED PARKING = 36 RETAIL (20,225 sf) REQUIRED PARKING= 81 692 RESIDENTIAL UNITS REQUIRED PARKING= 1,211 TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED= 1.328 STALLS ! : ~ / -~' --,~~'j' I' ' _' ~-~---~~·~l~--t~~:;J --~---c _eecernc,c,"'-,rns~e., ________ fiT --°'-__ 7- ==:;l,,:=-7-i-2 -~ C,,SCSC-0-ROPES,-> "'.~ .. ,: .. ,. -_ II ~ l jUl.,W.IULWUUIUMUL TOTAL PARKING SHOWN -1,366 STALLS LEGEND ~-ii;.~-==========----"·-EXIST1% BNRR :? 7J 5· OIKL LAN~ / ~ _ I Xl';I '.;lll'/IA_ ~\',Tl~·~---·'"-'""·" ------L~EW !l' SICEll'Alk LAk1> I ------------G"''"" "_'"-_ ·,c' / ---~' c it' Ji C.·1-, 1 ----~ so· c' 'k-------:-i / s..),7, I,..,..... ~-- J,\i R / ~ SCALE, , .. = 60 <" '-1//J c:--[ ~ "" <' "o-/ L ____ _ IE] DUMPSTER/ RECYCLE BIN ~ UTILITY AND ELECTRICAL SPACE N EXITSTAIR ~ LOBBY AREA ~Po~rn-y LINE _QT 7 ~iO, 775s' -----~,.)µ~1--, ,----\ •/vf_ -------....._________, __ _ pROFffiY uNS \ '~,- -~)- QUENDALL TERMINALS -PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE RENTON, WASHINGTON CENTURY PACIFIC, LLLP ~~~1;1% ~ ~ -i < ~ > ' l.,~ ... 1.-.1,, ~ :i ~ ,!, <>I " L ~ ~1' ¥ ~ ~ j_ u c-u ~ ;,.~ia~ 'I t~i·: • !:J,:! I -ij~t) " .. U) __J <( z 1'"1 ::;:e's _J I I _J 0::::: C) liJ 7 U ~ L r---Vi_ (-l :::1-._;.->-u: __J 7 >- _J n e:.:: <( c=-:-, z c- I. I L._ 0 f""V" u u z w => a ' >-' _J <C " . " " w ~ 0 ~ -N "<' W < N n:::;:; .. ;;; (t'. 0 N LU oi • "'-b: .. ;;, (t'. "'\ C Q._ u ~ • w I ~ w "' " _J w w,J e > ::i; l t:l w ' _J ~ u :::i • Z ~ O Y'. < n (t'. " < ~ sheet I P1.0 o__ ' ' §. ~ i ~! o< ·,.e:_ " ----~--_,.,, ___ _ ~.t,'/,'M sera~r:,,; ---........ _ --------~'---- " BUILDING COVER TOTAL AREA = 187,.350sf cour~ I YARD TOTAL Aq[A = 1" 7,60·:Jsf SUF~F AC:.. P<C .4Ri-..A = 89,00:Jst 8~J DLC< PKG N:LA = ~·9,000sf or< LlLC< LS A.'?LA = 2~.000sf I STREETS 'A', 'B' & 'c' Al~LA = S9,2:1Ds' SIOEWAL,< TOTAL AREA = 60,BOOsf f\'t,TURAL L/1f\DSCAP[ AR[A = 14D,.5J8sf _QT 7 SATELLITE PROPERTY = 50, 725sf UI\Pi\1/ED FIRE LANE & F'EO. 'WAL-< ARLA = 19,9/:Jsf srn:=_:ETS ·c· & '[' /1RE,'\ = 23,522sf S TR::TT L::VEL LI\NCSC/\f'E ~\REA = 1 ~·.3DOsf OT--!FR i Af\fJSCN'E /\RF.:,~. = .33,'195sf TOTAL SITE AREA TO HIGH WATER LINE = 925,376sf T_QQ ,_0~~--'~ -·,~ --/ --~ l __ ~ ~ /---------_/ ----------~ ~ -,,...___.,.....-/ / N~llfiAI l~~APL :~:: _ 14U '..l~sl //-~=---'-~ -t \ 1£' --_____,/ -------=-=--c:::c--=::---// ~--~ -~ -\\ § ____ _:-~-=~-----~~~-------iJWA~(QFIRE LA~E ~~-W~.;-m:t~~~~---='":s::_=-',, ~J / ~ --~---~~-:; -~----:-------~Ji(-) \c~---'f-~----,~~r \ i ---::-:_:_-/ ~_) ~ATU~ L .A o:r.:~~~,2~~-_£_ ,oo -? " :l :l ~ ,j,, :l '-ii \ u '-"-> o_ '"' •--8 a II '\ ; 'l, ~ ~ ; ~ , ~ : ~ : '? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : -~ \ : Q LI Cl O OC:, r," ~ .\ · a ~ B ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ \ l ~ ffi ~ ~j ~ ~ 13 ~ \ ) '°"a 3 !'5 ~ \ U 0 \/""'-, ~ if) 'f'.3' & 'C' ~9,750sf ~ ~ 'Z · -- r )~~ ',r ~,i~ 8 f ~ =· = ~ a ' • " • • < ~ ':; ~ a ' a " ' • ::s )l g 0 ,-:i [_ < i 0 ) w OHl'IM SE~BJ\~K O~'/IM SETBACK .~ \~- a • i r; ~~ , 1 • ~ ~ • u ; ' ' s \~I ~--__ _L" _0 _ _11_;1 I --j ~-~ U I snEET 'A' A~EA 4C,000sf / UN JLCK LS Ai{lA l OT 7 50, 7?5-d 2::,:JOOsf ~ I I I I ,, ! ' 11 IUf[J~li. 1-+-Rj '" !,lg~. I u 0 " 11:?,lt, ,, ·1 ; g C ,• i-£..:~ ' " ~I d.J ---\., ~ ~ii: ~i I ~ ~~u ~ ~,,, -\~~~ 11vl __J 11<C z 2is c_ _, ~ c--' D::: () w~ (_) T "-t'--Ul (_) <C < s l' __J z __J 0 r,- <C ~ cc 0~ z ,,, (_:, z w ~ a ~----j ' • ~ < 0 N N N 0 '-~ . VJ • w< , ~- []._ . co • J J ~-J 0 a - > ' w z 6 " =:J z ~ c-< :::J J • 0 shee• ___ <( w P2.0 CL <( ' ' ~ :} ~ t· §_ G z " QUENDALL TERMINALS -PREFERRED ALTERNATE Exterior Design Goals: Provide a coordinated design language with a variety of details and materials to Provide a human srale, highlight portal elements, and provide a visually interesting street-scape and facade. r BUILDING NW 2 RENTON, WASHINGTON CENTURY PACIFIC, LP Retail and Restaurant Space Features: A sidewalk orientatlon with architecturally articulated punched openings with glass extending to sidewalk Jevel Include canopies of steel and glass for weather protection Include sconce and i::anopy lighting fixtures for an appropriate lighting level Street lighting on public right-of-ways and intersections. Alternate facade materials and details are used for varie1y To visually conceal \he structured parking from sireet .. We are providing retail/restaurant at some street facades which completely screens parking behind Facades with parking directly behind have the following: • Architecturally articulated punched openings in-filled with grillwor',,; that also allows climbing vines. !nterrnillent trellis elements are vine covered Berm and extend landscaping to sill of punched openings. Alternate facade materials and details are used for variety. We avoid solid walls. BUILDING NW 1 Residential Floors Features: These floors are setback from the base facade for modulation and visual interest Additional architectural facade modulaUon is provided via: Horizontal plan modulation with projecting decks. Projecting vertical elements beyond the parapet Al!ernate fac.ade materials and details are used for variety Archltectural facade element variety. Strong corner elements to highlight the entry portal. Amenilies: --rf Large landscape courtyard at level I visually screens structured parking below and provides restful areas to view or for sitting, reading, and strolling. It may include an ex:ercise room or enter1ainment space. Potential for rooftop plaza with landscaping and green roof elements. Bulldlngs: There are 4 to 6 levels ,n 1hese m,xet1cnsive eleveted landscaped courtyards as an amenity Exterior Finish; Descriptions: Coping· Gl~ss & store fron1 system: Walls a1 Base of Building (level P 1) Walls above Base of Building (Residential Floor.i 1 throogh 5) Walls al Stair Penthouse & Roof Equipment: Railings. Grillwork and Trellis Material/Finish: Painted Met::il, color 10 ma1cn sjding Green tint insula1ed glass in aluminum frames. clear anodized -typical. Use ciear gtass at retail Includes a mi)( of ma1enals for var.ety • Conm.i1e -stained or 11ainted l1nish. • Brick veneer wilh randon color Includes a mix of materials for v;mety: Metal Panel Siding -1Jainte-d finish. Stucco -painted finish. Composite Panel Siding -painted rlmsh Bnck veneer with rardom color. Me!al Panel Sid,ng -painted finish. Painted Meal, accent colors TSO. C;;,•PH C <;("Al( PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION FROM LAKE WASHINGTON . L______2 ?-2t Entry C::inopy Painted Meter, accent color$ TBD Green tint glazing in ~luminum frame. --SO: PARTW... ELEVATION r. ::-~:~.~,--~---------------:~--~-~,-,~::.:--__ -_-11-------------1,-. . "" """"' -, . • ,•'"" ·'.__ ,-DTiliiil!OlCE ,,-,,•=cc•u,c. : ' ; "''= "' E"I '"I"' . , ~1 , ~ =y.,.,,-.·· . :' ,' "'"'" EB .,. _,...,J.. JI ""I : -,cl, .. ,,,~,,-- • . ""''" -~'"liil ,, . " • ~-------------------------------------------------------~ BUILDING NW 2 BUILDING NW 1 BUILDING SW 1 BUILDING SW 2 OVERALL WEST ELEVATION FROM LAKE WASHINGTON ~CA_L, 1" 12 Sconce L1ght1ng Fixtures l~pical et Level Pl. Selection TBD. """' lfV!.l ,. ,, • ..., BUILDING SW 3 BUILDING SW 4 ,·.i,A~i< s:,,Ls 'b.."'!'J -~o· T ~CACL · 1" • ~0' R,)1'' I ML 4'" ~Y-~ I f :;;r: i " I ' ~l,··~ I ' 1 · ~~!~.:)~ ,!~~'.Ft ~~·}t·~~L .JJ!; i ~ "' f D l {! ! it.:': ("; ~ I t! ~ ;:t, .);:\,1 ~·~; "' ~~1, ,~.~-,,-'"-~ (/) ...I <1': z ~ t§ G .. I ,--a:: ~ r __ ) ~ -- LL.I & ~~ 1--< -, ..J ?~ ~ ....I~(:~ <1': :;: '., C LL LJ rY () z LU :::::> 0 ~ ' _:; t-• _J 0 --' 0 w P3. _J w. I ~ i ~ I ~ z QUENDALL TERMINALS -PREFERRED ALTERNATE Exterior Design Goals: Provide a coordinated design language with a 11ariety of details and materials to Provide a human scale, highlight portal elements, and provide a visually Interesting street-scape and fai;.ade BUILDING NW 1 RENTON, WASHINGTON CENTURY PACIFIC, LP Retail .ind Restaurant Space Features; A sidewalk orientation wilh archltedurally articulated punched openings with glass extending to sidewalk level. Include canopies of steel and glass for weather protection Include sconce and canopy lighting fixtures !or an appropriate lighting level Street lighting on public right-of-ways and intersections Alterna1e facade materials and det8ils are used for var~ty To visually conceal the structured parlcing from street • We are providing retaiVrestaurant at some street facades which completely screens parking behind Facades with parking directly behind have the following: • Architecturally articulated punched openings in-filled with grillwork Lhat also allows climbing vines Intermittent trellis elements are vine covered Berm <1nd extend landscaping to sill of punched openings. Allerna1e facade materials and details are used for variety. We avokl solid walls. G"'JIPH:( SCALE PARTIAL SOUTH ELEVATION 'b-d, " S(:M.(· 1· ,,. Residential Floors Features: These noors are setback from the base facade for modulation and visual interest. Additional architectural facade modulation is provided via: Horizontal plan modulation with projecting decks. Projecting vertical elements beyond the parapet. Alternate facade ma1erials and details ere used for variety. Archileclural facade element variety. Strong corner elements to highlight the entry portal. Amenllies: Large landscape courtyard at level I visually screens structured parking below and provides restful areas to view or for sitting, reading. and strolling. It may include an exercise room or entertainment spacP. Potential for rooftop plaza with landscaping and green roof elements ~4· Buildings: There are 4 to 6 levels m these mixed use buildings as follows: P1 includes screened structured parking with some retail & restaurant uses sou1h facing inNW1. Floors aoove P1 are all residential use. Floor 1 includes extensive elevated landscaped courtyards as an amenity. Exterior Finish: Descriptions: Coping Glass & store front system Walls at Base of Building (Level P1 ): Walls above Base or Building (Residential Floors 1 through 5) Walls.at Stair Penthouse & Roof Equipment: Railings, Grillwork and Trellis Entry Canopy: Sconce Lighting Fixtures: Material/Finish: Painted Metal. color to mc1tch siding Groon tint Insulated glass in aluminum frames. dear anodized -typical. Use clear glass a1 retail. Includes a mix of materials for variety: Concre1e -stained or painted finish a Brick veneer with random color Includes a mix of materials for variety: Metal Panel Siding -painted finish. Stucco -painted finish. Composite Panel Siding -painted finish. Brick veneer with random color. Metal Panel Siding -painted finish Painted Meal. accent colors TBD. Painted Metal, accent colors TBD. Green tint glazing in aluminum frame. Typical at Level P1, Selection TBD r • ••• -• ---------• • • • • __ -•• _______ • • • • • -------____ • • _ • • • •" ----------SEE PARTIAL ELEVATION 11:.· ' ,';'·. ROOf JV[_·_ 6'1-.2j" -;.,, 5\n FLOOR 53.5 s t.t~ FLOOR ~j 5 ·e 3rd f"~COI\ 35.5" ·~ 0 '? ·;-:, f'-1 C FVL , [I] [[]] [I] [I] [[]] [I] 21J re r ·1 Tl rn [II] rn rn [II] rn :rn • mi JEI rn rn rn rn JIJ Qllia llEl CD :LU QlliarrEl "'"''l ~-------------------------------------------------------~ BUILDING NW 1 SOUTH ELEVATION ji:IJ.IDJ :'f . -~-~ . ~ .'l:!JB·m-1 ~:::;:i ... J ···-" '1• ~ ~ I n:;::: .... , ... , ,.,_,_,-- m _ _ ' BUILDING NE 1 CAAP>·:C SU .. E 3~· ~f,;....-_ ·sdr:; ~ 3c1· sc· C 1~: n J; I i ; i i 'f;ttL ' ,I C ~I : ' , ' . ' ·. ;'; .Q /: ~ 1! ~ '--~_J u: .,, < t~~e ,~! ' ' ! ~.,:; "~ -.:__~,,:-, (/) ...J <( z -:;E / n 0 _ _J I c:: :) LL.I 'I: .... (,C ,, ~'.:: ...J >· ...J z ·,· <( ~ __ ) / C ~ ~·~ z LL.I :::) Cl "I ~ " ~ " 0 • '~" r-< ' ....J u " ;; "' 0 0 • . < 0. ' < • ~" ~ '.j. 0::: l> s w" w LL.. UJ w l/] LcJ J "' a ~ ,l-e J: r 8 w u P3.1 w _J w l \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ dl 11 'J IJIJVd JsdnlN:D NOl~N IHSVM 'N01 N3d S1VNILAJ~3l 11VGN3nO >-a:: <( ~ ~ :::> tJ) 1- z :::> C z LIJ (!) LIJ ....I I I ~ ::s:: ~ aJ t;:; VJ z ~ I 0 0 0 " UJ Cl C UJ C z :5 t;:; ?: C z LIJ (!) LIJ ....I ~,;,;z !,at' 90Z: • ZZl\15 YM '31Ulf3S 4 301S])l\f"1 Of l 0 0 : a.. {; .0-.0i • .I ·1 w 03dtl3..:J 3cl d -NVld 31 IS -(/) ,.._~ 1-". oo ...1111 \ \. \ 0 \ -~ 0::: w 1- _J _J <( 0 z w :J a 0 td/1WON](J()/Ol160/~Q/:N 60-9L-LL 0 I ~ ~ z i i z </ / / / / / ~ o)t- {I) ~ ~ {I)("! ~ 'o) -:> "o--'o> Ulk£ W,4SH, tNGroN ...., ,::::. ~\ \j'y ------------- \-. ·, \ \, ~ \ ) -...__>110" 'l<AstR 51'0~0 LEGEND OHWM \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ c:;:;=i SURFACE P ARKlNC ON"C~AD~ 15" PARKING $P AC(S . \ ~ \\;' \ \ ..,\ s:;::i i 1b.\ ~ .. 1'-).\ 'f. \.\ \~ 50' WETLAND SETBACK ~--------~ 100' OHWN SETBACK ~ -~ WETLAND EDGE .......---..-a--,- i_ -t---•• •• •• RED c.JAG!: P,;.;;;;c;- _J_ -r -r-- -.... -....,,...,,.... ~ ··--··--··---·· l.QYlliED ~ PAR!ill:!li. ~ \ J ~ ~ ~ -:>('!, ~ 0 -:>" Cc o)~· °s, ~ 0-:><P t {I)~ {I)~ ~ ~ ,v 'o- ) 0 I EXISTIN G PROPERT Y LINE 'r '!i g; E'.XISliNG ONRR g 6' Bl~[ LANE SCALE: 1· • 60' .,,,,,. ,,-/ ~ ~ z 50' 0 1--'h'J,.j SETBAC___i 100· OH~ S£T8AG_K 1 m n ~ ·1t n • n, - PARKING SUMMARY P-1 COVERED GARAGE PARKING: SW QUADRANT -347 PARK ING STALLS NW QUAD RANT -95 PARKING STALLS SE QUAD RANT a 3 18 PARKING STALLS NE QUADRANT = 206 PARKING STA LLS TOTAL P-1 PA RKIN G a 966 STALLS SURFACE PARKING: SW QUADRANT = 151 SURFACE PARKING STALLS SE QUADRANT -42 SURFACE PARKI NG STALLS NW QUADRANT -38 SURFACE PARKING STALLS TOTAL SURFACE PARKI NG -231 STALLS DECK PARKING SHOWN ON SHEET PO .O: SE QUADRANT -1 30 DECK PAR KING STALLS NE QUADRANT • 39 DECK PARKI NG STALLS TOTAL DECK PARKING -169 STALLS RESTAURANT (9,000 sf) REQ UIRED PARKING -36 RETAIL (20,225 sf) REQU IRED PARKING = 81 692 RESIDENTIAL UNITS REQUIR ED PARKING -1,211 TOTAL P ARKING REQUIRED -1,328 STALLS TOTAL PARKI NG SHOWN • 1 ,366 STALLS LEGEND IE] DUMPSTER / RECYCLE BIN @II UTILITY AND ELECTRICAL SPACE 0 EX ITSTAIR f~ LOBBY AREA PROPERTY ll\j[ L OT 7 50,725sf t ~ P~o,,tRtq liit --....._ .. ------- ~~i_i_ i i t {I)("! ~ -:>o, / pRQP{Rf'/ u«t QUENDALL TERMINALS -PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE RENTON, WASHINGTON CENTURY PACIFIC, LLLP v) _J <C z -0... 2 z _J 0 _J f--_J 0:::: C) • w ~ ~ I LL f---(/) ---- _J 6 Ct'. <C f--=> z -w z 0 C::: CL u z w => 0 "' £1 "' ~ "' "' ....: "' "' _J 0 <( "' 0 -"' w "' Ct'. -< .; Ct'. "' w .. LL . :i: w ~ ~ Ct'. 0... I: LI;:\ I w Cl) ' _J w w -0 > X ~ w " _J w 0 5 • 0 "' < - sheet I P1.0 0... 'i' ~ ~ z ~ 2 ! ~ ~ z QUENDALL TERMINALS -PREFERRED AL TERNA TE Exteri or Design Goals: Provide a coord inated design language with a variely of deta ils and materials to Provide a human scale. highlight Portal elements. and provide a visually interesting street-scape and facade. , BUI LDIN G NW 2 RENTON, WASHINGTON CENTURY PACIFIC, LP Retail a nd Restaurant Space Features: A sidewalk orientation with architecturally articulated punched openings with g lass extending to sidewalk level Include canopies of steel and glass for weather protect ion Include sconce and canopy lighting fixtures for an appropriate lighting level. Street lighting on public right-Of-ways and intersections. • A lternate facade materials and details are used for variety. To visually conceal the structu red parking f rom street We are providing retaiUrestaurant al some street facades which completely screens parking behind. Facades with parking directly behind have the f ollowing: • Architecturally articulated punched openings in-filled with grillwork that also allows c limbing vines. In termittent trellis elements are Vine covered. Berm and extend landscaping to sill ol punched openings. Alternate facade materials and details are used for variety. We avoid sohd walls . Residential Floors Features: T hese floors are setback from t he base facade fo, modulation and vis ual interest. Add itional architectural facade modulation is provided v ia · Horizontal plan modulat,on with projecting decks. Projecting vertical elements beyond the para pet. , Alternate facade matenals and details are used for va nety. , Arch itectural facade element variety. Strong comer elements to highlight the entry portal. Amenities: Large landscape courtyard at level I v isually screens st ructured par1<ing below and provides restlul areas to view or for sit1ing, reading , and strolling. ti may include an exercise room or entertainment space. Potential l o, rooftop plaza with landscaping and green roof clements. Buildings : Tnere are 4 to 6 levels ,n tnese mb:ed use butto,ngs as fOllows • P1 includes screened slrudure-0 perking 'Nlth some retail a, restaurant uses south facing mNWl . • Floors above P 1 are all residenhal use. Fklor 1 includes extens,ve elevated landscaped couriyards as an amenity Exterior F i nis h : ~ Descriptions: Coping: Materi.1 1/Finish: Painted Metal. cok>r t o match sidrng. B UILDING NW 1 CRAPH'C SO.I. [ Glass & store front system Walls at Base ot Bu1khng (Level P 1 ): Walls all<Ml Base of Bu11drng (Residential Floors 1 through 5 ) wans at St.air Penthouse & Roof Equipment: Raclu,gs, Gnltworl< and Tre"is: Green tint insulated g lass in aluminum frames. dear anodized -typical Use clew-glass at retail Includes a mix o f ma1e11.als for \131'ie ty • Concrete -stained or painted firush. • Brick veneer with random cok>f Includes a mix o f matanals 10< vatiety- Metal Panel &ding -painted fini:$h. Stucco -painted finish. • Composite Panel S1chng -painted linish • Brick veneer with random color. Metal Pone! Siding -painted finish. Painto-d Meal, accent colors TBD. PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION FROM LAKE WASHINGTON 12· o· 1:r 24· ,.., -l SCA£: ,· • 1:r Entr y Canopy: Painted Metaf, a ccent colors TBO. Green tint g lazing in aluminum frame. Sconce Ughijng F octures· Trp;cal a t l evel P1 . $election TSO r-------• • --• • -•-• • •---•-• -• -----------__ ----• --• • • -• • --'H .....-:-_...-·SU: P.ARTW. lllVATlON I : ~~'''" 2_, . .,n~ z_,.., J\OOl'I "~- ;, 1~ '·°"' 23' !!.._,un~,J~' ,. ~ p., 1.£',<. oo· I ------ I --....... NOOf' ~Ml t•n· ~"!..:'~~ --; ~}.£: ;:;;,J:. : '7 e,. J<d '\OOA lJ~ • ~-------------------------------------------------------~ BU ILDIN G NW 2 BUILD ING NW 1 BUILDING SW 1 BUILD ING SW 2 OVERALL WEST ELEVATION FROM LAKE WASHINGTON B UIL D ING SW 3 c~t1c s:1..~r J>' Q ~ w· GO' : SCA!.L 1· • ~O B U ILDI NG SW 4 ftlXll' lC'wf'L .,;~-~ ! ~11 noo-J.i.~· ~ ... .. t_f,d fl.O()lt ].)~---=--.. ' i ·, uri.~,J~"-...:..,. .. ':'.'1 L£V(l oo· ~ .... (/) ..J <( z :E § Q_ 0::: 0 u L -LU I' LL. I-(f'. :i ~ Q_ ..J ->-..J z 0::: C ::i <( 1--I 7 7 C LL. w (Y u z LU ::::> O' ~ ~ t-..'. _J <{ Cl w n::: n::: w LL w n::: a.. (/) z "' w ~ < 0 0 " "' < .. ~ w J J w :, ~ w LI z < "' "' "' " ~ "' .. 2 -" " . -., .. < } . ~ .. = u j ~ "' . w -0 l'. ~ " u j . ~ .... sheet 0 F ~--, <{ ~I P3.0 _J w ;;: ---' 3 ~ ~ ~ 0 ---z QUENDALL TERMINALS -PREFERRED AL TERNA TE Exterior Design Goals: Provide a coordinated design language with a variety or deta ils and materials to Provide a human scale. highlight portal elements. a nd provide a visually interes~ng street-scape a nd racacte . BUILDING NW 1 RENTON, WASHINGTON CENTURY PACIFIC, LP Retail and Resta ura nt Space Features: • A sidewalk orientalion with architedurally artk:ulated punched openings 'With glass extending to sidewalk lev el. • Include canopies of steel and g lass for weather protection , Include sconce a nd canopy lighting fixtures fo r an appropriate lighting level. • Slreet lighting on p ublic right-of-ways and intersections. • Alternate facade ma terials and details are used for variety, To visually conceal the strudured p a rk ing from street: • We are providing retaiVrestaurant at some street facades which compfete ly screens park ing behind . Facades with parking directly behind have the following: • Archijecturally articulaled punched open ings in.filled "ilh grillwork that also allows climbing vines. Intermittent trellis elements are vine covered. • Berm and extend landscaping to sill of punched openings • Alte rnate facade m aterials and deta ils are used for va riety. • We avoid solid walls. GRl\?HIC SCALE ,~ 12' PARTIAL SOUTH ELEVATION c;('.At.f ,· • 12· Resident ia l Flo ors Featu res: • T hese floors are setback from the base facade for modulation and v isual interest. • Additional arcllitectural facade modulation is provided via: Horizonta l ptan modulation with projecbng decks. Projecting vertical elements beyond the parapet. • Alternate facade materials and details are used for variety • Architectural facade element variety. • Strong corner element s to h ighlight the enlry portal. Amenities: • Large landscape courtyard at level I visually screens structured park ing bek>w and provides restful areas to view or for s itting, reading, and strolling. It ma y inciude an exercise room or entenainment space. Potential ror rooftop plaza with landscaping a nd green roof ~ements. 24' I Buildings: There are 4 to 6 levels in these mixed use build ings a s follows. P1 iricludes screened struc tured parking with some retail & resta urant uses south facing in NWl . Floors above P l are a ll residential u se. Floor 1 includes e xtensrve elevaled landscaped courtya rds as an amenity Exterior Finis h: Des criptions: Coping: Glass & s tore front system· W alls at B ase of Building (Level P 1) Walls above Base o f Building (Residential Floors 1 through 5) Walls at Stair Penthouse & Roof EQuipme nt: Ra ilings. Griltwork and Trellis : Entry Canopy· Sconce L ighting Fixtures: Material/Finish: Pain led Me tal, color lo match siding. Green t int insulated glass in alu m inum frames. dear anodized -typical. Use clear glass at retail. Includes a mix of materials for variety. • Concrete -stained or painted finish . Brick veneer with random color Includes a mix of materials for variety : Metal Panel Siding -painted fin ish. Stucco -painted finish Composite Panel Sid ing -painted finis h. B rk;k veneer with random color. M etal Panel Siding -painted lin,sh. P a inted Meal. accent colors TBD. P a in led Meta l. accent COiors T BD. Green tint glazing in aluminum fra me. Typical at Lever P1 . Selection TBD. r-------------• --•••--•••••••••••--------------___ -------. --------S EE I (<' PARTIAL ELEVAT IO N "' ·~ .. 2 ~ 0 0 ·2 ~ ' ·~ 'lOOf LcVE-6<.2~· :ltn ~ u.:ut-? :i3.!:i " 4tn F"'LCOR 4 3.5" 3rc: F'LOOR 33.5. 2ro F,OOR 2J 5' ___r-.....r~ 1st rLOOR 13_5 . P I tFVE.. I I I I I I I I ~-------------------------------------------------------~ BUI LDING NW 1 SOUTH ELEVATION "re r.jj i'IE Eelffi Ill Ill f!ll!!l IEJ [IE Ill Ill Ill r1 ~ IIIEll m f [IE Ill [IE Ill Ill ~ Ill [IE [IE /" g rn !';µI i;;;u;a m ~ EEG rn rn rn rn Em []]J I EE rn !):! IlEI m mi lIEl ~ EE m iIE rn rn rn rn i=:ma c=ma • ~ . []]J []]J BUILD ING NE 1 C'l4?H1: sc1._r :,o~· :,o· 60' SCALE ,-• lO' (/) ..J <( z . 0 .. . D .. ~ z Q_ 0 _J f-a: C) -7 ':::! w :::: L. t-&i u <( < <'" n. ..J -_ >- ..J L. C::: <( 0 ""') f-f-z z 0 Id l,I Ct: () z w :::) O' ., ,n ,n N ,n ~ ,0 0 N .. w -~ -~ f-< < --' 0 ., <( 0 .. .. < 0'° ~ w< 0::: .. 0::: w a LL w W-' .J Cl:'. w u Q_ :, -0 l 5 w " u < T .; z < ., o-' ~ ·;·~.1 -' w ~,.#\ Aspectconsulting • ' earth+water PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL STUDY Quendall Terminals Renton, Washington Prepared for: Altino Properties Inc. and J.H. Baxter & Company Project No. 020027-010-04 • November 11, 2009 ' Aspectcansutting • earth+water PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL STUDY Quendall Terminals Renton, Washington Prepared for: Altino Properties Inc. and J.H. Baxter & Company Project No. 020027-010-04 • November 11, 2009 Aspect Consulting, LLC John L. Peterson, PE Senior Associate Geotechnical Engineer jpeterson@aspectconsulting.com Henry H. Haselton, PE Senior Associate Geotechnical Engineer hhaselton@aspectconsulting.com V:\010027 Queadall Tcrmil:Jab\Gcotcchnical St1.1dy\final.\Quendall Final Gcot«.h Enlitlemc11l_l l_l 1_2009.doc 401 Second Avenue S, Suite 201 Seattle, WA 98104 Tel: (206) 328-7443 Fax {206} 838-5853 www aspectconsultmg com ---~ I ASPECT CONSUL TING Contents 1 Project and Site Conditions ....................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 Purpose and Scope .............................................................................. 1 1.2 Authorization .............................................................................................. 2 1.3 Project Description ..................................................................................... 2 1 .4 Adjacent Properties .................................................................................... 3 2 Site Conditions ............................................................................................ 5 2.1 Surface Conditions and Topography .......................................................... 5 2.2 General Geology ........................................................................................ 6 2.3 Seismic Setting .......................................................................................... 9 2.4 Field Exploration ...................................................................................... 1 O 2.4.1 Review of Existing Subsurface Information ......................................... 10 2.5 Subsurface Conditions ............................................................................. 11 2.5.1 Potential Modifications to the Subsurface ........................................... 11 2.5.2 Groundwater ....................................................................................... 12 3 Geotechnical and Environmental Considerations ................................. 13 3.1 Soft Ground .............................................................................................. 13 3.2 Seismic Hazards ...................................................................................... 14 3.2.1 Surface Fault Rupture ........................................................................ 14 3.2.2 Ground Response .............................................................................. 14 3.2.3 Liquefaction ........................................................................................ 15 3.3 Environmental Considerations .................................................................. 16 4 Site-Wide Geotechnical Options .............................................................. 18 4.1 Mitigation of Lateral Spreading ................................................................. 18 4.1.1 Ground Improvement.. ........................................................................ 18 4.1.2 Lateral Resistant Piles/Anchors .......................................................... 18 4.2 Building Support ....................................................................................... 19 4.2.1 Static and Seismic Settlement ............................................................ 19 4.2.2 Displacement Piles ............................................................................. 19 4.2.3 Structural Slabs .................................................................................. 20 4.3 Earthwork ................................................................................................. 20 4.3.1 General Site Preparation .................................................................... 20 4.3.2 Shallow Groundwater and Dewatering ................................................ 20 4.3.3 Preloading .......................................................................................... 20 4.3.4 Infrastructure Development Considerations ........................................ 21 PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 ASPECT CONSUL TING 5 References ................................................................................................. 22 Limitations and Additional Services ............................................................... 23 List of Tables 2.5.1 On-Subsurface Geologic Units and Properties ........................................ 12 3.1 .1 Estimates of Static Settlement.. ............................................................. 14 List of Figures 1.1.1 Site Vicinity Map 1.1.2 Site Plan 1.1.3 Proposed Site Plan 2.2.1 Geologic Cross Section A-A' 2.2.2 Geologic Cross Section B-B' 2.2.3 Geologic Cross Section C-C' 2.2.4 Geologic Cross Section 0-0' List of Appendices A Existing Site-Wide Geotechnical Data ii PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 ASPECT CONSULTING 1 Project and Site Conditions 1.1 Introduction This report presents the results of a preliminary engineering study by Aspect Consulting, LLC (Aspect) to provide a planning-level understanding of geotechnical considerations, and support a development entitlement process for re-development of the Quendall Terminals property (Site) located in Renton, Washington. Aspect is also engaged in assessing environmental conditions and evaluating cleanup alternative to address site impacts associated with past industrial activities at the Site. The environmental work is being completed under agreed order with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The environmental studies will be documented in separate reports. Geotechnical recommendations, as presented herein, have been developed in coordination with the clean-up study planning. The location of the Site is presented on Figure I. I. I. The approximate locations of selected explorations previously accomplished on-site are presented on Figure 1.1.2. 1.1.1 Purpose and Scope KPFF and Century Pacific have prepared conceptual development plans for the approximately 19-acre Site and have requested this geotechnical evaluation to assist in the master planning process. The development concept under consideration is mixed-use commercial and high density multi-story residential. Buildings would generally be setback from the shoreline. We understand the proposed buildings typically will be 5 to 7 above-ground stories with the lowest 2 stories dedicated for parking. Street-level space will also be used for commercial purposes. No below-ground levels are planned. A preliminary site plan is shown on Figure l. l.3. Site development will need to consider the environmental Site characteristics and constraints relating to site environmental cleanup, and the relatively weak, compressible soils known to be present on-site. Grades would be raised across the Site with a generally 2-to 5-foot capping fill. Thicker fills might be required at certain locations. We anticipate that typical development features such as underground utilities, pavement/roadways, and grading will be important considerations for the conceptual plan. The principle objective of this study is to provide planning-level geotechnical engineering recommendations to support the development entitlement process. Additional studies and design will be necessary after detailed development plans become known. The key geotechnical conditions that must be considered include: • Seismic hazards, such as liquefaction, lateral spreading, and amplified seismic response; PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 1 ASPECT CONSULTING • The need for enhanced building support on special foundations such as improved ground or piling; • Geotechnical considerations for designing and constructing utilities, grading, and other development features on weak, compressible ground; and, • Potential construction costs associated with special geotechnical construction methods that could be used to mitigate the geotechnical challenges at the Site. Geotechnical solutions for site development must also be consistent with selected environmental remedies, and will be subject to approval by EPA. Our study included reviewing available geologic literature, maps, and Site data to assess the physical properties of the subsurface soils at the Site. This information was used to develop concept-level conclusions and recommendations for the potential Site develgpment. 1.2 Authorization Aspect entered into a Professional Services Agreement with Altino Properties, Inc. and J.H. Baxter & Company to perform this work. The Professional Services Agreement was authorized by the Altino Properties, Inc. on August 19, 2009 and J.H. Baxter & Company on August 31, 2009. Our scope is based on our proposal dated April 17, 2009. 1.3 Project Description 2 The proposed project is illustrated on Figure 1.1.3. It would include the construction of 800 residential units plus office, retail, and restaurant space. Parking would be accommodated in the lowest two levels of the buildings. The buildings would be up to seven stories high. We assume that the buildings will be steel and/or concrete-framed and would have foundation loads that are typical for buildings of this size and type. The development plan is divided in to "Quads" separated by proposed roadways running east-west and north-south. A roundabout is planned at the intersection of the central roads and at the south end of the central north-south roadway. Another roundabout with parking is planned at the western terminus of the central east-west roadway, adjacent to the shoreline. Roads are also planned along the eastern, northern and southern property boundaries. We understand the roadways will become public right-of-way and will be constructed in accordance with City of Renton standards. We assume that typical utility infrastructure, including domestic water supply, sewer, power, communications and possibly natural gas, will be constructed in the rights-of-way. Open space and a recreational trail are planned for the waterfront. The shoreline is irregular, and the proposed buildings are generally set back from the shoreline greater than 100 feet from the shore. However, there are two locations where the setbacks will be less than 100 feet, as shown on Figure 1.1.3. The planned buildings include 450 residential units in the SW Quad, bordering Lake Washington. This Quad will include three buildings separated by landscaped courtyards. The northernmost building (bordering the central roadway) in the SW Quad will have PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 ASPECT CONSUL TING retail and restaurant space. Buildings in the SW quad will have five residential floors over two floors of parking and/or commercial space. The NW Quad, also bordering the lake, would have 175 residential units within two buildings, and commercial space in the building bordering the roadway. A landscaped courtyard will separate the buildings. These buildings will also have 5 floors of residential space over two floors of parking and/or commercial space. The SE Quad would have 175 residential units and office space within three buildings, separated by landscaped courtyards. The buildings will include five floors of residential or office units over two floors of parking. The NE Quad will have one office building with five stories of office space over parking levels, and a large parking structure on the NE comer of the Site. Geotechnical and Environmental Constraints Geotechnical study of the Site indicates weak, compressible soil with considerable static and seismic settlement potential, liquefaction potential, and liquefaction-induced lateral spreading potential. The proposed multistory buildings will require a deep foundation system to address settlement concerns. Lateral spreading can be mitigated through engineered lateral resistance features associated with individual buildings, such as batter piles or anchors. Alternatively, site-wide lateral spreading mitigation could be accomplished with broader scale lateral restraint techniques such as in-situ stabilization, soil densification, soil replacement, or a containment structure. Deep foundations and/or site-wide lateral spreading mitigation measures must be coordinated with environmental remediation, long-term environmental protection objectives, and civil/structural design. The implementation of geotechnical solutions for site development is subject to review and approval by the EPA. Fill cap construction will need to be scheduled such that time is allowed for the majority of the soil consolidation to be completed prior to the installation of grade-sensitive utilities or roadways. Special building/utilities connection may be required to account for long term organic and seismic settlement. 1.4 Adjacent Properties To the north of the Site is the former Baxter property, currently used as the Football Northwest training facility. The Site had contamination related to past wood treatment processes, and a shallow groundwater table with weak shallow soils. The geology and contamination issues are similar to those at the Site. However, a distinct geologic difference at the Football Northwest site is the presence ofrelatively shallow bedrock in the northern section of that property, where the structure was built. Large diameter drilled shafts were used for the building foundations on that property, and they were designed to resist lateral movement. No significant improvements for liquefaction and lateral spreading were made for the remaining (southern) portion of the on-grade fields. The property to the south, formerly known as Barbee Mill, is a residential subdivision being developed by Conner Homes. This site was also contaminated from wood PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 3 ASPECT CONSULTING treatment processes, and has geologic conditions that are similar to the Site. Areas of high arsenic level were excavated and refilled with compacted gravel. A permeable reaction trench was provided down-gradient of the contaminated area, which treats impacted groundwater. 4 Soils at the Conner Homes site are weak and highly varied across the site. A structurally- compacted cap fill was placed over the site. Shallow foundations in the structural cap were allowed by the City of Renton for the lightly loaded single family homes, except where sited directly over the reaction trench where structures were placed on pin piles. No apparent mitigation for lateral spreading was performed. PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 ASPECT CONSULTING 2 Site Conditions This section provides a discussion of the physical site conditions, including our characterization of the subsurface conditions. Figure 1.1.2 illustrates the current Site features layout and selected historical features. 2. 1 Surface Conditions and Topography The Site borders approximately 1,500 feet of Lake Washington shoreline, and is bordered on the east by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad tracks and right-of-way. Immediately adjacent shoreline properties include Conner Homes to the south (former Barbee Mill property) and Port Quendall Company/Football Northwest to the north (former J.H. Baxter & Company property). Access to the Site is across the railroad tracks from Lake Washington Boulevard, located along the eastern side of the property. Interstate 405 is located approximately 500 feet to the east. The Site had been a wood treatment facility from about 1917 to 1977. From 1977 to present, the Site has been used as a log sorting and storage yard. Various structures, docks, pits, and tanks have existed from time-to-time on the Site. Only small scattered buildings remain currently on the Site. Several utility easements currently exist on the Site. Further details of the Site history are documented in a prior report supporting the on- going environmental investigation (Anchor and Aspect, 2007b) The Site is located on Lake Washington in the northernmost limits of the City of Renton (City). The Site occupies the middle portion of a roughly 70-acre alluvial plain, which was historically formed as a delta where May Creek enters Lake Washington. The topography has been modified over the past 90 years by filling and grading activities. The property currently slopes at a I to I Y, percent grade towards the shoreline, having a maximum relief of about 15 feet across the 19 acre area. Upland elevations at the Site range from approximately 35 feet on the east side of the property to about 20 feet at the lakeshore (all elevations reported in NAVD88). At the shoreline, the slopes increase to about 20 percent for about 20 feet in elevation to lake level. The lake-bottom portion of the alluvial fan grades at approximately IO percent or less toward the center of the lake. The Site su1face is predominately wood dust/soil fill or wood debris. Gravel access roads and remaining structure foundations make-up less than 5 percent of the surface area. Site drainage is relatively poor because of the flat topography and the fine-grained nature of the surface soils. During the active log yard operation and prior to implementing the interim measures, most runoff was directed into two stormwater collection ponds on the west side of the Site (Quendall Pond and South Detention Pond) and a drainage ditch along the southern property boundary. Storrnwater also accumulated in low-lying areas east ofBH-24, southwest of BH-21A/B, and south ofBH-20A/B (refer to Figure 1.1.2). Following curtailment of the log sorting operation, interim storm water management measures were implemented in October 2008, to control storrnwater discharges to the PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 5 ASPECT CONSUL TING lake, promote infiltration in less contaminated areas, reduce int1ow into Quendall Pond, and prevent erosion (Anchor and Aspect, 2007b). 2.2 General Geology 6 The geologic units beneath the Site consist of highly heterogeneous shallow alluvial and lacustrine silts, sands, and peat underlain by a coarser sand-gravel alluvium. The shallow alluvial deposits are overlain by fill deposited over the years since the lake level was lowered in 1916. The alluvium was deposited by May Creek and the Site is located within the creek's delta. The delta extends well below lake level, approximately 5,000 feet along the shoreline of Lake Washington, and projects up to 3,000 feet offshore toward Mercer Island. No1mal delta depositional processes where the May Creek channel changes position periodically, and episodic earthquake-induced slumps that occurred at the face of the delta, have resulted in a deposit with abrupt changes in lithology and little vertical or lateral continuity of units. Detailed geologic cross sections along four alignments show subsurface conditions and the relationship of the uplands portion of the Site to Lake Washington and underlying sediments. Cross section locations are shown on Figure I. 1.2 with the cross sections on Figures 2.2.1 through 2.2.4. The major geologic units are described below. Fill and Fill History Fill is found across the entire Site. Draft Task 3 report (Anchor and Aspect, 2007b) provides a detailed history and annotated observations of the surface activity and fill soils. A condensed presentation of this information is presented below. Along the southern and eastern boundaries, fill ranges from l to 2 feet in thickness, while in other areas, the fill ranges to more than IO feet thick. Most commonly, the fill is a mix of silt, sand, and gravel with wood debris. Wood chips and bark from the log sorting operations are common in the upper few feet with finely ground wood dust covering the Site up to a foot in depth. Where creosote and pitch-like (tar) material has been encountered in soil explorations, such materials have generally been observed at depths greater than 2 feet below the ground surface. In addition to the industrial surface contaminants, dense non-aqueous liquids (DNAPL) contamination has been observed at the Site to a depth of generally 25 feet, with a maximum depth of 32 feet below ground surface. Specific areas of fill include: • Northwest Quarter of Site: Fill may be as thick as 10 to 14 feet in this portion of the Site. Fill in this area includes abundant wood material, glass, brick, and pitch-like material. • East ofQuendall Pond: Fill is 7 to 9 feet in thickness with brick and pitch-like material observed in area explorations (BH-515A, TP-4, and TP-9). • Former May Creek Channel: Exploration logs from this area indicate that some of the fill used in this area includes tar, brick, wood, and metal fragments to depths of 6 to 7 feet. PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 ASPECT CONSUL TING • Former Tank Area: Tar and pitch were logged at a depth of 5 feet in borings BH-5, BH-6, and BH-25. This may represent a previous ground surface in the former tank area (the tanks areas are shown as circles on Figure 1.1.2). • \Vest of South Detention Pond: In July 2007, slag-like material was observed in near-surface soils in the area of former well BH-12. Fill history is informed by geologic characteristics identified in subsurface explorations and historical records. Key episodes of fill placement at the Quendall Site are summarized below: • The Lake Washington Ship Canal was completed in 1916, which resulted in the lowering of the lake level by about 9 feet. Not long after the lake was lowered, tar refining operations began at the Site. Both the existing shoreline and the historical (pre-1916) lake shoreline based on historical DNR maps are shown on Figure 1.1.2. • May Creek stream channels were located on the southern portion of the Site until the creek was rerouted sometime between 1920 and 1936. These channels have now been filled in. The former channel locations on the Site, indicated by early DNR maps, are shown on Figure 1.1.2. • Solidified tar products (pitch or "Saturday coke") were reportedly placed on the Site during the period of creosote manufacturing. These materials as well as other debris, including brick, concrete, and metal have been observed in the fill unit. • Foundry slag from PACCAR, Inc. was reported by Roberts (Anchor and Aspect 2007b) to have been placed as fill along the shoreline. Although geologic logs in this area generally have not identified slag, a few pieces of slag-like material were identified in the June 2007 well survey east of the former location of well BH-12 during the environmental review of the Site. • In 1983, Quendall Terminals placed approximately 3 feet of fill consisting of sawdust and soil over most of the Site. • Ongoing log yard operations have resulted in the creation of several piles on the Site consisting largely of wood debris. Shallow Alluvium The shallow alluvium at the Site consist of interbedded sand, silt, clayey silt, organic silt, and peat beds, characteristic of a deltaic environment. The shallow alluvium occurs throughout the Site to a depth of about 25 to 50 feet, with thinner deposits in the eastern portion of the Site. Saturated conditions have been encountered at depths ranging from 2 to 10 feet depending on groundwater elevation and seasonal recharge. The shallow alluvium was deposited by the May Creek delta. The delta complex is composed of three general sets of strata. Nearly horizontal topset beds were deposited in the fonner floodplain and shallow marshy areas near the mouth of the creek. Inclined foreset beds were deposited on the delta face below lake level near the mouth of the former creek, and dip into the lake at low angles (less than 10 degrees). Nearly horizontal bottomset beds were deposited on the lake floor well away from the mouth of the creek. The majority of the delta is composed of the gently dipping foreset beds. PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 7 ASPECT CONSULTING 8 Very soft peat and organic silts present within the shallow alluvium is interbedded with very loose silty fine to medium sand. Interbedding occurs when sandy sediment is deposited on the gently sloping delta face to form foreset beds. The sediment is deposited on the delta slope at an angle that is marginally stable. During this delta forming process, the accumulated sediment periodically slumps or flows down the face of the delta to form a poorly graded and laterally discontinuous lens of sediment. Fine-grained silt and clay sediment carried in suspended load is carried farther and deposited as thin layers on the delta face and on the lake floor beyond the delta foreset beds. Occasional floods deposit fine sediment on the marshy area at what was once near lake level. The process of alternating deposition of finer and coarser sedimentation continued as the delta accumulated material over time. As the sediment built up a topographic mound around the mouth of May Creek, the stream would periodically jump its bank and shift laterally to a new position (a process called avulsion). Deposition of coarse-grained sedimentation then resumed elsewhere on the delta and the former location of sandy deposition was blanketed with silt and clay and organic-rich wetland deposits. Periodic large earthquakes also created significant disturbance of the sediments. Since much of the sediment that composes the delta foresets was rapidly deposited in the quiet water of the lake, the soils are weak and the delta is at the margin of its presumed stability under static conditions. During an earthquake, large po11ions of the outer surface of the delta slumped into deeper water, disrupting strata and re-depositing sediment. The result of normal delta avulsive processes and periodic earthquake-induced landslides is a deposit with abruptly changing lithologies and potentially limited vertical and lateral continuity of beds, when considering the entire delta. Deeper Alluvium The deeper alluvium is generally coarser, consisting of medium dense to dense sand and gravels. This unit occurs below a depth of 30 to 50 feet, with a shallower occurrence of about 25 feet at the southeast comer of the Site (BH-l 7B). The sand and gravel most likely represents an earlier phase of delta growth when the sediment supply to the area was coarser, likely following de-glaciation of the lowland during the late Pleistocene and early Holocene. Borings SWB-3 and SWB-4B were completed to depths of 121 and 151 feet, respectively (Anchor and Aspect, 2007a). In these borings, a fine to medium sand was encountered at approximately 90 feet, followed by a silty clay deposit at approximately 120 -135 feet. Lacustrine Deposits As inferred from geophysical explorations (Woodward Clyde, 1988) and deep borings completed at the Site, the base of the alluvium is estimated to be in the range of90 to 135 feet below ground surface (bgs). Below this a silt/clay was interpreted to be a lacustrine deposit consisting of a very soft to medium stiff silty clay. A third deep boring (SWB-8) was completed to a depth of 121.5 feet near the lakeshore and did not reach this fine grain sequence. A fourth deep environmental boring (BH-20-C) was recently completed near the shoreline with a fine to medium sand encountered at approximately 80 feet, followed by a silty clay deposit at approximately 135 feet. PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 ASPECT CONSULTING 2.3 Seismic Setting The Site is located in a moderately active seismic zone. The subsurface soils beneath the Site exhibit susceptibility to liquefaction to a depth of about 80 feet. The Site is within an area of active tectonic forces associated with the interaction of the offshore Juan de Fuca plate, the Pacific plate, and the onshore North American plate. These tectonic forces result in earthquakes generated in three source areas: subduction zone; deep intra-slab or Benioff zone earthquakes; and shallow crustal earthquakes. Each of these three sources has characteristic magnitudes, rupture characteristics, length of shaking, and average recurrence intervals. Subduction zone earthquakes occur during rupture of the contact between the subducting oceanic plates and the over-riding continental plate. Rupture zones for these earthquakes can occur over several hundred miles oflength along the Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ) and extend from offshore to near the longitude of the Site. Ground shaking could last for up to several minutes with magnitude on the order of 9 or higher. Strong aftershocks are common. The distance from the Site to the rupture surface would reduce the intensity of the shaking at the Site. The recurrence interval for a CSZ earthquake is believed to range from around 200 to 700 years, averaging about 500 years. The last great CSZ earthquake occurred about 300 years ago. Deep intra-slab, or Benioff Zone earthquakes occur due to tensional rupture within the subducting Juan de Fuca plate at depths of 45 to 60 kilometers (km). Earthquakes from this source have potential for magnitude 7.5 events. Due to the great depth of these earthquakes, very strong shaking is attenuated at the surface. These earthquakes occur every few decades and include the 2000 Nisqually earthquake. Strong aftershocks are not common and ground rupture is uncommon. Shallow crustal earthquakes potentially present the greatest concern to proposed Project features. These earthquakes occur when the shallow crust ruptures due to compressive forces associated with interaction of regional tectonic blocks within the larger North American plate. They generally occur within the upper 30 km of crust. Because the source is shallow, they have the potential for strong ground shaking, with magnitudes up to 7.5, which would produce intense shaking at the Site, and numerous aftershocks. Crustal faults exist in the region. The most significant to the Project is the Seattle fault, an east-west running compression fault zone that separates the Seattle Basin to the north from the Seattle Uplift to the south. The southern edge of the currently mapped fault zone crosses the Site and has a number of identified past rupture surfaces, some of which have been active during the Holocene epoch (the last 10,000 years). The Seattle fault is considered "active" which means it is anticipated to generate earthquakes in the future. Large shallow crustal earthquakes can conceivably produce ground rupture at the Site. Large Seattle fault earthquakes capable of causing regional uplift or subsidence are thought to occur on the order of every few thousand years, with smaller events capable of localized uplift or subsidence occurring about every thousand years. The most recent event was large, caused regional land level changes, numerous landslides (both subaerial and subaqueous) into Lake Washington, and occurred about 1 , I 00 years ago. PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 9 ASPECT CONSUL TING Due to the distance to known past fault rupture surfaces and the large width of the fault zone, the potential for ground rupture at the Site is considered low during the life of the proposed development. Due to the lengthy recurrence intervals, the potential for strong ground shaking is low during the life of the proposed development, but must be considered for the structure design as required by the building code. The potential for moderate shaking from all identified sources is considered high during the life of the proposed development. 2.4 Field Exploration No new geotechnical field exploration was conducted for this stage of study; however, new environmental borings (sonic core)/probe data have been incorporated into this study along with review of previous explorations and investigations as shown on Figure 1.1.2. Descriptions of the sediments encountered in past explorations by others, as well as the depths where characteristics of the sediments changed, are indicated on the exploration logs presented in Appendix A of this report. Generalized subsurface conditions are interpreted from our review of existing subsurface data and associated environmental exploration program, with respect to overall site geology, and are shown on Figures 2.2.1 through 2.2.4. · 2.4.1 Review of Existing Subsurface Information 10 Various environmental borings have been performed on the Site in the past by Hart Crowser, CH2MHill, and Woodward-Clyde Consultants, and others. These data were compiled and categorized to support the on-going environmental investigation (Anchor and Aspect, 2007a). Some of the explorations by Shannon & Wilson collected geotechnical blow count data using hollow-stem auger (HSA) and mud rotary drilling methods. Four mud rotary borings by Shannon & Wilson were on or close to the Site. Aspect has added to the subsurface database with a series of probes and environmental borings, which are currently in draft form to be released under separate cover. Substantial weight was given to the mud rotary borings for evaluating soil engineering properties at the Site, since they represent the best standard-of-practice sampling for soft/loose soils relative to SPT blow count testing, and they were deep. A selection of other HSA boring data, which where shallow, were compared to the analysis results from the mud rotary and produced similar trends of potential liquefaction prediction. As expected, these borings did not indicate as severe a potential as the mud rotary data. Those HSA borings and other environmental borings and probes were used to extend our interpretation of the extent of strata across the Site, based on the qualitative field-based textual and strength descriptions of the different soil strata encountered in the explorations. This has allowed for reasonable extrapolation of the deep mud rotary boring data across the Site. PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 ASPECT CONSUL TING 2.5 Subsurface Conditions 2.5.1 Potential Modifications to the Subsurface Environmental investigations at the Site have identified the presence ofDNAPL within the Shallow Alluvium across much of the Site, and also under the BNRR property along the eastern property boundary. The DNAPL is the source of dissolved phase chemical constituents observed in groundwater beneath the Site which discharges to Lake Washington. The process for assessing environmental conditions, and evaluating and selecting a cleanup remedy is still on-going. This process includes a feasibility study of cleanup alternatives to evaluate the range of potential remedies to address environmental impacts. Remedial actions to address existing soil contamination will be a key component of the remedy. Although the remedy has not been selected, it is anticipated that alternatives will include actions that may modify the subsurface conditions at the Site and therefore need to be considered when evaluating geotechnical constraints for site redevelopment. Modifications to the subsurface may include (but is not limited to) one of the following actions, either as a stand-alone or in combination of other actions: soil capping, in-situ stabilization, and removal/replacement. Modification of subsurface conditions would likely occur in the upper 25 to 30 feet bgs. Some of the actions will alter the engineering properties discussed below. It will be important from a design and implementation cost standpoint, to integrate the proposed geotechnical solutions for Site redevelopment with site cleanup actions, to the maximum extent possible. Site development constraints, such as the need for pile supported foundations, need to be identified and considered as part of the remedial evaluation process. Summary of Geologic Unit Properties Surface and near-surface conditions are especially variable across the Site, in terms of presence, thickness, and composition of various fill units. Deep subsurface conditions should also be considered to be approximate, as available subsurface data below approximately 40 feet below ground are somewhat limited. In general, soils from O feet to approximately 25 feet deep (Fill and Shallow Alluvium) are relatively weak with variable compressibility and permeability characteristics. Soils from approximately 25 feet to 135 feet (Lower Alluvium Deposits) are moderately strong with low compressibility and high permeability. Below 120 feet, soils consist of Lacustrine deposits with moderate strength, low to moderate compressibility, and low permeability, which are presumed to overlie other glacial deposits and rock. General engineering properties of these subsurface units are summaiized in Table 2.5. 1. PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 11 ASPECT CONSUL TING Table 2.5.1 -On-site Subsurface Geologic Units and Properties Min to Max Geologic uses Relative Compressibility Permeability Description Depth Classification Strength (ft bgs) Fill SP to SM, GP to GW, Low to Low to high low to high 5 to 14 ML, various debris moderate Organic Silt/Peat 4 to 24 ML, OH, MH, PT low High Low to Moderate Shallow Alluvium 5 to 50 SM, SP, SP-SN Moderate Low to Moderate Moderate to Deeper Alluvium 25 to 50 SP, SP-SM, GP, GW High Low Lacustrine 115 to Ml,Cl Moderate low to Moderate Deposits 135 2.5.2 Groundwater Twenty-four groundwater monitoring wells are located on the project Site. Aspect is currently monitoring water levels in these wells as part of ongoing environmental investigations at the Site. Groundwater is typically encountered between approximately 2 and 10 feet bgs, with groundwater flow generally east to west/northwest direction towards the lake. Vertical groundwater flow gradients in the Shallow and Deep Alluvial units at the Site exhibit downward gradients along the eastern portion of the Site becoming upward near the lake shoreline. The adjacent Lake Washington is influenced by the lake level management of the U.S Army Corps of Engineers Chittenden Locks in Seattle. Lake level varies two feet during seasonal changes, with the lowest level typically maintained from November to February. The groundwater levels in site monitoring wells show a varying degree ofresponse to lake fluctuations, which appears to correlate with distance to the lake. Water levels during the winter are typically higher on the eastern side of the Site, due to greater recharge from adjacent uplands, and lower on the western side of the Site, due to the controlled lake level, than during the summer. High High Low 12 PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 ASPECT CONSULTING 3 Geotechnical and Environmental Considerations This section provides a discussion of the planning-level geotechnical and environmental considerations that should be considered for the development entitlement process. 3.1 Soft Ground This section discusses soft ground conditions under static (non-seismic) conditions. Soft ground considerations as they relate to seismic conditions are discussed in a later section ofthis report. Our characterization of subsurface conditions suggests the Site is underlain by a surface layer of Fill that is variable in composition and density, and is generally on the order of 8 to 10 feet thick. The Fill mantles a sequence of very, soft Shallow Alluvium ranging in thickness from about 20 to 35 feet and consisting primarily of fine-grained organic-rich and peaty soils with scattered loose sand layers. Deep Alluvium consists of generally more competent sands and gravels to a depth of 130 feet or more. Very soft, fine-grained Lacustrine deposits were encountered beneath the alluvium. Competent, glacially consolidated soil and/or bedrock were encountered beneath the alluvium on the adjacent shoreline properties (Football Northwest to the north), but were not encountered in explorations on the subject property. The near-surface soils (Fill and Shallow Alluvium) are considered to be compressible and weak. Soils of this nature cannot be expected to support the foundation loads anticipated for the planned buildings. Therefore, deep foundations (piles) will be required to support the buildings and any other heavily loaded and/or settlement-sensitive structures. Certain ground improvement technologies may be applicable to support structures, subject to further analysis. The implementation of pile foundations and/or ground improvement is subject to review and approval by EPA. The near-surface soils will also compress under the load of new fills that would be placed to grade the site. Settlement of new fills would be variable due to the variability of the Fill properties, combined with the variable thicknesses of the Fill and Shallow Alluvium. Static settlement occurs in two forms: primary compression from static loading of new structures and fills, and secondary compression, which stems from decomposition of organic materials. Building settlement is not considered since, as previously discussed, it is assumed that buildings will be supported on piles. However, settlement of the compressible sediments after pile installation can produce negative skin friction, or down-drag loads, on deep foundations, which must be considered in design. lfthe fill cap is placed and allowed to settle before building and utilities are constructed, subsequent total and differential settlements can be minimized. Primary settlement estimates for the · placement of a 5-foot cap, and additional amounts of new fill are summarized in Table 3. l. l. An estimate of secondary settlement is also provided. PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 13 ASPECT CONSUL TING Table 3.1.1 -Estimates of Static Settlement Source Amount at Surface (inches) Primary Compression from New Fill 18 (5-foot-thick) Primary Compression from 1.5 inches per foot of fill Additional Fill Secondary Compression over 100-5 vear Desion Life The shallow groundwater across the Site would present construction challenges for trenching and excavating below the water table. Construction dewatering should be anticipated for these deep excavations. If deep excavations occur after parts of the Site are developed, construction dewatering plans will have to consider the potential of dewatering-induced settlement caused by draw-down of the water table. Any dewatering activities will need to consider health, safety and water treatment issues associated with potential exposure to and extraction of dissolved phase chemical constituents in groundwater. 3.2 Seismic Hazards Seismic hazards to consider for Site development include surface fault rupture due to the proximity of the Site to the Seattle Fault Zone, amplification of strong shaking as a result of the soft soil profile, and liquefaction of the relatively weak granular soils beneath the Site. Hazards associated with liquefaction include lateral spreading, where the low- sloping unsaturated, near-surface soils tend to translate shore-ward during soil liquefaction, surface settlement caused by the shaking-induced consolidation, temporary loss of strength (and bearing capacity), and sand boils caused by the expulsion of excess porewater pressures during liquefaction. The following sections described these hazards in greater detail. 3.2.1 Surface Fault Rupture Faults that could produce surface rupture in the project area are not well-defined and are thought to have recurrence intervals in the range of one to several thousand years. The current state of engineering practice in the Seattle area is such that surface fault rupture is only considered in extraordinary cases. In our opinion, the relative risk of fault rupture at the surface of the Site is very low, and it is unlikely that development plans in the near future will explicitly design for this risk. 3.2.2 Ground Response The soft ground conditions are expected to cause moderate amplification of seismic shaking, compared to the inertial seismic forces that would be expected at a similarly located site with a finn soil profile. Appropriate design of structures in accordance with 14 PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 ASPECT CONSULTING the current International Building Code (!BC) will mitigate seismic hazards to acceptable risk levels. !BC requires design for a "Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE)" with a 2 percent probability of exceedance (PE) in 50 years (2,475-year return period). The United States Geological Survey (USGS, 2002) has completed probabilistic ground motion studies and maps for Washington. The USGS maps indicate that for recurrence intervals of 475 and 2,475 years, the peak bedrock acceleration in the Site vicinity would be 0.32g and 0.66g, and have magnitudes of6.5 and 6.7, respectively. Current !BC design methodologies express the effects of site-specific subsurface conditions on the ground motion response in terms of the "Site Class" for IBC. These factors represent the density and stiffness of the soil profile underlying the Site, and are used to account for the seismic response of the soil profile. Based on our characterization of the subsurface conditions, the soil profile at the Site would fall into !BC Site Class "F". With the limited set of data available at this time, a preliminary seismic analysis was performed for the Site. This analysis was based on the non-site specific seismic factors allowed by Chapter 18 of the 2006 version of the !BC using a Site Class "D". !BC Chapter 18 allows that in lieu of using a site-specific study, the peak ground acceleration used for design can be set as the 5% damped design spectral acceleration at short periods, Sos, divided by 2.5 (Sos/2.5) for the purposes of evaluating geotechnical site effects. Therefore, a peak ground acceleration (PGA) of 0.39g (Sos/2.5) was used for evaluation of the ground motions at the Site. Given the amount ofliquefaction forecasted by our analysis and the type of proposed structures, a site-specific study will be required for the actual design of the structures. 3.2.3 Liquefaction Liquefaction occurs when loose, saturated and relatively cohesionless soil deposits temporarily lose strength as a result of earthquake shaking. Primary factors controlling the onset of liquefaction include intensity and duration of strong ground motion, characteristics of subsurface soil, in-situ stress conditions, and the depth to groundwater. Liquefaction evaluations were conducted with the aid ofLiquefyPro, a seismically induced liquefaction and settlement analyses software program developed by Civi!Tech Corporation (2009) and WS!iq, a liquefaction analysis software program that was created as part of an extended research project supported by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and authored by Kramer (2008) Based on our characterization of the Site, and the ground motions described in the previous section, our analyses indicate that moderate liquefaction hazards exist to a depth of about 80 feet, with the exception of fine-grained Shallow Alluvium layers, which are not considered to be liquefaction-prone. Seismic Settlement Liquefaction-induced settlements were estimated using the recommended methods presented by Kramer (2008) and Civi!Tech (2009), and our characterization of the Site subsurface conditions. Based on these studies, we estimate that seismic settlements PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 15 ASPECT CONSUL TING produced from a design-level earthquake could range from about 12 to 30 inches across the Site. A comparative analysis of the 1 in 74 year return period earthquake is predicted to cause 4 to 5 inches of settlement at the surface, indicating Site design concerns from a much more likely event. Due to the variability of the seismic settlement results, it should be assumed that fairly significant differential settlement on the order of several inches can occur after a design level earthquake. Lateral Spreading Lateral spreading is the movement toward the shoreline of the "crust" of soil above the liquefiable layer. Since liquefaction of the underlying soils appears likely during the design earthquake, there is also potential for seismically induced lateral spreading towards the shoreline. Because of the size of the Site, we evaluated lateral spreading magnitudes at varying distances from the shoreline, using the Site topography, and our characterization of subsurface conditions. Using the empirical methods presented by Kramer (2008) and Youd, et al. (2002), we estimate the lateral spreading could result in horizontal displacements from 8 to 13 feet near the shoreline, and I to 3 feet along the eastern edge of the Site. The empirical methods are not site-specific, and the regression formulas that form their basis could over-estimate predicted displacements. Given the unique, deltaic geologic environment of the Site, site-specific numerical analyses would be appropriate for predicting post-liquefaction ground displacements with a higher degree of confidence. Sand Boils Sand boils are liquefaction-related features that could potentially result from subsurface porewater pressure relief via the path ofleast resistance. They manifest themselves as small mounds on the surface of ejected soil slurry. They are typically several feet in diameter and cause a mound that can be several inches high. Up to several cubic yards of material can be ejected. If sand boil occur, their locations are typically random, and the prediction of their occurrence is not considered practical for design. 3.3 Environmental Considerations 16 A summary of existing Site conditions and environmental investigations completed to date are summarized in a report by Anchor and Aspect (2007a). The primary contaminants of concern are DNAPL in soil, and dissolved-phase chemicals in groundwater. Soil contamination is generally limited to the Fill and Shallow Alluvium. Environmental remedies currently under consideration will focus on protecting the aquifer that is present in the Deep Alluvium, and water quality in Lake Washington. The geo-structural solutions that could enable site development include pile foundations and/or ground improvement technologies, as discussed in Section 4. The final cleanup action at Site is anticipated to include leaving DNAPL contaminated soil in-place. Design of these solutions must consider protection of the deep aquifer (Deep Alluvium) when and if they penetrate the contaminated upper strata beneath the Site both during construction and in the long term. The design and installation of deep piles and ground improvement will require coordination and approval by EPA as part of the remedy PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 ASPECT CONSULTING selection process. The following provides a starting point for consideration of pile installation techniques. Limited research has been performed on the issue of potential carry down of contamination and cross-contamination of aquifers stemming from installation and long- term presence of piling at contaminated sites. Since 2000, several investigations have been completed on the installation of driven piles in "Brownfield Sites", including those with DNAPL-related contamination. An EPA-funded, state-of-the-art paper by Boutwell, et al. (2005) summarizes the current body of knowledge, and provides recommendations for pile foundations at Brownfield Sites. In the past, environmental regulators have required expensive protection measures for pile installation, generally focusing on surface casing measures through the contaminated zone to prevent carry down. Boutwell (2005) identifies the potential mechanisms of aquifer cross-contamination resulting from the installation and presence of driven piling, and how these mechanisms can be overcome by appropriate design. With proper consideration to these mechanisms, standard driven displacement piles can be safely used without special near-surface protection measures. Regulators in some states have allowed driven piles under these circumstances and without special near-surface protection measures. The current state-of-practice is such that driven displacement piles can be used in the conditions at the Site, provided that proper pile materials and installation techniques are used. Impermeable pile materials are necessary, such as steel or concrete, in order to not provide a conduit of contaminants by "wicking". Piles should be installed using displacement methods, such that in-situ soil is displaced during their installation, resulting in densification of the soil immediately adjacent to the piles and sealing of the pile-soil interface. Pointed pile tips should be used during driving to avoid carry-down of a "plug" of contaminated soil during driving. Ground improvement technologies could also be considered for stabilizing the Site with respect to soft ground and seismic hazards. Ground improvement could potentially be used in concert with environmental remedies. Appropriate ground improvement technologies would involve in-situ strengthening of soil by densification, in-situ soil stabilization by a variety of grouting techniques, soil removal and replacement and internal drainage to dissipate excess porewater pressures that can cause liquefaction. Near-shore ground improvement utilizing internal drainage techniques could potentially be feasible due to the upward hydraulic gradient of the deep aquifer. These ground improvement technologies have the potential to be applied singularly or in combination with each other. The use of ground improvement technologies will be considered in consultation with EPA as part of the evaluation of site remedial alternatives. PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 17 ASPECT CONSULTING 4 Site-Wide Geotechnical Options Technically viable geotechnical options exist to develop the Site as planned. As noted previously, structures with vertical settlement sensitivity will need to be placed on piles or improved ground to maintain design functionality. Options are available to mitigate the post-earthquake lateral spreading problems. Geotechnical options must also consider the environmental site cleanup, and the need for EPA approval, given the soil and groundwater contamination that is known to be onsite. Sequencing of site work (major fill grading) will be an important consideration to minimize total and differential settlement of features that gain their support from shallow soil. The geotechnical site improvement options create an additional expense to the project when compared to a location with competent soil and no contamination. Different geotechnical mitigation strategies, combined with potential contamination remediation strategies, may produce combined cost effectiveness, when compared to a strategy of each mitigation effort being performed independently. 4.1 Mitigation of Lateral Spreading Given the calculated predication oflarge post-earthquake lateral spreading at the shoreline (8 tol3 feet) and the significant movement (I to3 feet) at the eastern boundary, buildings must be designed to resist such movement/soil loading to maintain structural safety. Based on our review of the available data, using anchors or battered piles at the building foundations, or a designed ground improvement program, would provide the necessary lateral movement mitigation for the buildings. While augmented foundations would provide protection of individual buildings, a ground improvement program has the potential to protect larger areas of the Site and possibly provide Site-wide benefits. 4. 1. 1 Ground Improvement 4.1.2 18 Ground improvement strategies could be used to produce area-wide or site-wide protection from lateral spreading. Site-wide protection would have the benefit of increased seismic performance of proposed buildings, roads, open space and utilities during and after strong shaking. The extent and depth of improved ground, in combination with building foundations, must be such that life safety is protected in accordance with applicable building codes. This could be accomplished with deep foundations for buildings and ground improvement designed to limit seismic-induced ground displacements to tolerable limits. Further analysis and EPA approval would be required to develop preliminary design and cost analysis of such an appropriate ground improvement program. Lateral Resistant Piles/Anchors If the building foundations are to independently resist the lateral movement imposed by lateral spreading without ground improvement, then the following loads would need to be PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 ASPECT CONSULTING considered. The upper soil profile of unsaturated soil, which would be mobilized during lateral spreading, would exert passive pressure on buried structures and foundations. This loading could be taken by the lower foundation elements and transferred to the pile system or to anchors. The silty peat zones may not completely liquefy but would be too weak to prevent the movement and would load the pile trunks. These additional lateral loads could be resisted from battered piles incorporated into the structure base foundation system, or through very deep anchors fixed into the non-liquefied zone of the Deep Alluvium and stressed into the easterly walls/footings of the structures. Because of the significant length required of such anchors, it would be beneficial to design these as high capacity anchors to reduce the number of anchors. The lateral resistant pile/anchor system would provide restraint for the buildings only and would not offer protection for the general Site. 4.2 Building Support 4.2.1 Static and Seismic Settlement , All building foundation designs must incorporate the potential settlement expected over the life of the building. The estimated settlements and sources have been discussed in Section 3. Due to the large settlement estimates, the likely foundation system for the planned buildings is a deep pile system. The long-term and seismic settlement of these soils can also produce negative skin friction, or down-drag loads, on deep foundations which should be factored into the capacities of the piles. 4.2.2 Displacement Piles In general, deep foundation options include driven piles and drilled piles. In the Seattle area, the common driven and drilled piles for buildings are steel pipe piles and auger-cast piles, respectively. Steel pipe piles can be filled with concrete after driving, or left empty. They can also be driven close-ended or open-ended. Another system which has been used in Seattle is the driven cast-in-place pile. This type of pile has the benefit over the auger cast pile in that no contaminated material is withdrawn from the ground, and has been documented to have similar capacities. The actual pile type would be subject to approval by EPA. Studies have shown (Boutwell, 2005) that smooth-walled displacement piles are effective at preventing vertical migration of the DNAPL types of contaminants found on-site. Driven steel pipe piles, which are commonly used in the Seattle area, would appear appropriate for these purposes. Other proprietary displacement piles have also been used for these purposes in other areas of the country and could be considered as options as well. Steel pipe piles are driven using a heavy impact hammer that is controlled by a lead, which in tum is supported by a crane. The principle advantages of driven steel pipe piles are their relatively high capacity, the speed in which they can be installed and structurally loaded, their capacity can be readily determined, and they create no spoils. Steel pipe piles can be easily spliced and driven open-ended to penetrate or displace obstrnctions. The principle disadvantages of driven piles are noise and vibrations created during constrnction, and their relative cost when compared to driven cast-in-place piles. PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 19 ASPECT CONSUL TING 4.2.3 Structural Slabs Slabs-on-grade may be feasible for lightly loaded structures gaining support from shallow foundations. However, with the high likelihood for long-term, site-wide settlement, and the potential for embankment and seismic settlements discussed in Table 4.2.1, the use of standard slab-on-grade floors in combination with pile-supported structures is not recommended. As noted in Section 3, the post construction settlements (secondary and seismic) are estimated to be large and slabs-on-grade would settle differentially from the building foundations. Therefore, ground floors of pile-supported structures need to be structural slabs, tied into the building foundations, to maintain functionality. 4.3 Earthwork 4.3.1 General Site Preparation Special considerations relating to general earthwork and grading at the Site include the shallow water table and the presence of compressible near-surface soil. In general, development plans should minimize excavation depths to avoid the need for construction dewatering and shoring ofloose saturated soils. Re-use of on-site fills should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Grading work will need to be coordinated with the approved environmental cleanup plan to maintain cost effectiveness. Removal of existing accumulations of woody debris associated with the former log yard operation prior to placement of any additional fill is recommended under planned building and roadway footprints to avoid long-term settlement resulting from decomposition of the wood fill. In non sensitive areas, such as open landscaping and surface parking, placement of additional fill over woody material may be acceptable with the understanding that grades will need to be restored in the future. 4.3.2 Shallow Groundwater and Dewatering Deep excavations should be avoided if possible due to the shallow groundwater table. Additionally, in areas where excavation would intersect the silt/peat zones, shoring will probably be needed given the low strength of the peat and the high groundwater table. In areas where relatively deep vaults, pump stations etc. penetrate below the planned fill cap, allowance should be made for dewatering of the excavations. If a deep excavation is required and it is determined that dewatering is necessary, the impact of dewatering settlement will need to be evaluated especially if the dewatering is near the property boundaries. Dewatering activities will also need to consider health and safety issues and treatment/disposal of impacted groundwater. 4.3.3 Preloading We understand an approximately 5-foot fill cap is plaru1ed for the majmity of the Site. This cap should be placed with a grade surcharge to account for predicted settlement. It should also be placed at several months before any grade sensitive feature such as foundations, roads or utilities are installed. This timeframe can be shortened if the Site is preloaded to a higher fill grade and then the excess fill removed. More detailed analysis is necessary to evaluate the specifics of preloading. Planning should consider that further 20 PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 4.3.4 ASPECT CONSULTING settlement would occur due to the high organic content of the lower sediments, even if a preload is utilized. Infrastructure Development Considerations Underground Utilities The practical depth to which underground utilities can be placed is limited by the relatively shallow groundwater depth. It is desirable to maintain these in the fill cap. Sags resulting from post seismic differential settlement pipe support will result in undesirable sags that can adversely affect the performance of conveyance pipes. Therefore, initial maximum gradients may be desirable where allowed by cover requirements. Flexible connections to buildings will be necessary to allow for the differential settlements from grade load changes and seismic settlements. Low impact stormwater management techniques that rely on infiltration, will also be limited due to the shallow groundwater depth in most areas, and contamination considerations. Pavements and Roadways The wood waste fill should be removed in areas where grade sensitive roadways and utilities are going to be constructed prior to cap fill. As noted previously in non-sensitive areas the wood waste could remain with future maintenance performed where required. The pavements in areas where relatively competent surface fills exist, can likely be designed with standard pavement sections. Soft areas encountered during construction should be overexcavated and replaced with clean, compact sand and gravel prior to placing the standard pavement section. PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 21 ASPECT CONSUL TING 5 References 22 Anchor Environmental, LLC and Aspect Consulting, LLC, 2007a, Task 2 -Summary of Existing Information and Data Quality Report. Remedial Investigation/Feasibility, Quendall Terminals Site. Report prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region I 0, on behalf of Altino Properties, Inc. and J.H. Baxter & Company, by Anchor Environmental, LLC and Aspect Consulting, LLC, August 2007. Anchor Environmental, LLC and Aspect Consulting, LLC, 2007b, Task 3 -Preliminary conceptual Site Model, Remedial Action Objectives, Remediation Goals, and Data Gaps. Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study, Quendall Terminals. Report prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region I 0, on behalf of Altino Properties, Inc. and J.H. Baxter & Company, by Anchor Environmental, LLC and Aspect Consulting, LLC, August 2007. Boutwell, 2005, Presentation titled-Installation of Driven Piles in Brownfields Sites, by Dr. Gordon P. Boutwell, PE, Pile Driving Contractors Association 2005 PDCA Winter Roundtable, Charleston, SC, February 19, 2005. CH2M-HILL, 1978, Memorandum to Tim King, Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Prot Quendall Development Renton Washington, By Jeff Layton CH2M-HILL, 20 December l 978. CivilTech Software, 2009, Liquefy Pro v5.5j Analysis program. Kramer, S., 2008, Evaluation of Liquefaction Hazards in Washington State, prepared for the Washington State Transportation Commission. Shannon & Wilson, 2006, Geotechnical Report Seahawks Headquarters and Practice Facility Renton, Washington. Prepared for Football Northwest, LLC. September 13, 2006. U.S. Geological Survey, 2002, United States National Seismic Hazard Maps: http://gldims.cr.usgs.gov/nshmp2008/viewer.htm. Youd, T.L., Hansen, C.M., and Bartlett, S.F., 2002, Revised Multi linear Regression Equations for Prediction of Lateral Spread Displacement, Journal of Geotechnical Geoenvironmental Engineering, 128 (12), pp. 1007-1017. PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 ASPECT CONSUL TING Limitations and Additional Services Work for this project was performed, and this report prepared, in accordance with generally accepted professional practices for the nature and conditions of work completed in the same or similar localities, at the time the work was performed. It is intended for the exclusive use of Altino Properties, Inc. and J.H. Baxter & Company and their agents for specific application to the referenced property. This report does not represent a legal opinion. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. The conclusions and interpretations presented in this report should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. This report is issued with the understanding that it is preliminary in nature and that additional geotechnical studies will be necessary to support future designs. Additionally pile type selection along with any ground improvement will need to be presented for approval to the EPA. This scope of our work did not include environmental assessments or evaluations regarding the presence or absence of wetlands or hazardous or toxic substances in the soil, surface water, or groundwater at this Site. The Site remediation studies are being conducted under a separate scope of work. PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 23 www .a:;pectconsultilg.com e Mnilodli-""if'tcompany Quendall Termi nals Renton , Washington Nov 2009 or~e•"' J JP """"" PM8 ......... ~ PROJ£CTNO. d, 0 0 020027 ~ 'iii 'O FIGURE NO. C Q) 1.1.1 ::, Q a Legend Shoreline (2009) Shoreline {1936) -----Shoreline (1920) Shoreline (1916) / BH24/ 29 @ I __J 0 () B-1 21.a@ Soil Boring with Geotechnical Data \f/r I .QP-1 D ~ Geoprobe Boring Historic structure Existing structure { J Estimated maximum extent of ONAPL prior to Task 5 implementation -...---;: - \\ // ~ .· \'\ \ ' \ ' '\\ \<~\ ' ' \<\. \\ \~ ... IIH-i.-@ ~11.5 ; "" 6" -. @· -·~ I J I ~"" / ', i I \ I ', ~;/-,,~ I I \ 0 ' I i 'i I I / \ I . ·-/ D .,. BH23@. ;,-: '--..'-..~/ D /---------\ f ' f ' ( ' \ \ ' --- " C O::, C 'D ,,, 1 'i O ,!f.V/ L~clid.Mate~· 0 // oad1ng Pl , , 1 arm ·// ' f. ,.ie.: 0 '/"'lr'rlP' ~---a•1(J,'~.6.ad·.· ·· ·· · u. rera··· y:i;i <.:.~.·· ·' 0 /5'; · , Fo[r'rler v.· .. i'/ I _P[ant A 'I" ; ' Entrance 0 Af'fe· xiil"at~ Former ~~~~i~i~tc~~~n. ..... v ' § ~ I , \ \ ',/ ---i f '\ ' ..:::.-02002' • / , -0 ---·"'"'''·"' s;te Plan -~ --l I ' " ---. -1.1.2 ' @att-111 111.0 / // I ormer-r: -.\~ · --?:7-- Car,L' ,·restle/ I,'.· -.-..;; ,e>admgArea: .. ,~ --- · .. / ''/ ; ----~ ------- -_. F]er-- May Creek _ Channels / :::. :::. ~ ;cc_ / ! --.. ~: .,.,- ' /,/. . ·•·. ~-" ... ·, .. · .. / .-· ./-'". •' -~ ·. ' /,, .· ··. h· . /.'.. ' ~ u ./ / / ./ ./ ./ / "' -@•N---' --~---,=~ ~ ---D ,Aspect.....,., a~odall T•~;a,h; -· 0 I .. r111,w,,., t n Washington , ' I --o. \ I "' - / O 120 ..... ..._. Foot -' •, ·-:-""·-::- ' ii SW OJAD SE QUAD '75 RESIDrnT,AL UNITS (280 CARS) '1 C,000!.i OFFICE (330 CARS) c-, ~ ~ " 0 0 u ~ LAKE WASHINGTON 0 wo ~~ Mi'.: "" ~5 ~u SW 2 RESIDENTIAL 5 FLOORS. 0.li1R PARKING 42,954s~ND AREA 190 UNITS ',-\\Gl'I ~}l,.l[~ St"OR£Llti£ i~ u> ~-o< B WU -·--- 0 < ~ w < " " < _Jif Cl 51l:: z Z~-5 Q~ [l)V,' -a!!o:~ ....,og:~z ;:;:'ON::l ~.r,uiN~ ---·--0EN-fffit1Nf-?2:....~ -f---- ~ANDSCAP[D COURTYARD cl •:s -" ,. wn 0 ,i~ Z O woo 0 0 vi VI -!fl ~8§i "'r:.o.:=i w O• V,u"lNll;I " ' n • •• ;:;:'~ 8c "" ~ « ti~ w~ ~B U 0 ~u E~., oog '"'C': t:,l..-,;:::; ,,_ ' I I i i ~ I ii i ii. Ii . , I t --ffi • ii .I.. I I ; •::s -;-I~ a.._,a. a <~55 Z>o !-WOO:: ~§i@QO~ (l'.u,5'io_,-. ~~9~~ (fl~ ........ u"l ~Zlf"lNf's. ~ANDSCAPED COUi.'TYARD OV£R P-2 ! l ..... _. 1il ' ' I I : ~ •I• ' NW 2 ~ I 5 FLO SIDENTIAL I 26.311~UND AREA I 100 UN<TS I I -·---~~ .. ,-...... I -----?-eEtHf-Ri..tNE-·i'i,:.·~R+VE·----------f·---·-·-j -~~ i 0 Z< aw •" •• "o oz ~6 t,O~ ~~f. "08 -w. w"-,i; Z~'>t-. ~~GI I I iSI ~ I • 1·14 -+-=t-, ----4--_____L_ z .=t= ~-=±=a= = --+ n =±= ~ ~~~ • ·~ i 1 z ~ > ffi 5 • n TOTAL SITE SUMMARY 800 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS 266,300sf TOTAL OFFICE 21,600sf TOTAL RETAIL 9,000sf TOTAL RESTAURANT P-1 & P-2 TOTAc AREA = 816,085sf (PARKING FOR 2,095 CARS IN STRUCTURE) PARKING ON GRADE = 169 CARS TOTAL PARKING = 2.264 CARS USEABLE SITE LESS NEW 60' R.O.W. = 18.9 ACRES PARKING ASSUMPTIONS: RESIDENTIAL @ 1.6 STALL PER UNIT RETAIL @ 4 STALLS PER 1,000sf RESTAURANT A@ 1 STALL PER 1 OOsf OFFICE @ 3 STALLS PER 1,00Dsf RESIDENTIAL UNITS ARE 1,100sl AVERAGE NW QUAD 175 RESJD[NT•AL UN,TS (230 CA.RS) NE QUAD 101,000sl OFflCE (JOJ) CARS) ·, -...... • ..,1?0,':,, -·-·----~'ff.:ftt..1Hf-i',tf-W--~eRIW--·---·----------~ ·-c", ,,, ----·-- QUEN DALL TERMINAL CONCEPTUAL PLAN '---ANCE MUELLER & CENTURY PACIFIC 7-27-09 P.SSCCIA TES LL. C *ALL STATISTICS ARE. BASEJ ON CONCEPTUAL PLAN WHICH ARE APPROXll"1A T[ AND SUBJECT TO. CHANGE (' PRoPERTY LINE D(1SC1NG BNRR GRAPHIC SCALE s~· sp· 't SCALE: ,· "' so· ~ " lil 8 < ~ ~----./-z+--------- / _J <{ z -Q) (1) u.. C C 0 0 ~ -30 6i w Legend - t; ... "' -c: "li ~ ~ Q c -~ 13 ~ j c:: .Q ~ i .s FILL : Silt, Sand, Grav el, Wood and Mixed Debris Shallow Alluvium: Stratified Organic Silt. Peat, Sand Deep Alluvium: Coarse Sand and Gravels La custrine Deposits: Silt and Clay --- 'St' a; ~ i3 -I i -Boring ID and offset from cross section (() ct 53 7 Water level at ~n time of drilling 5 300 ----Boring • 19 3 Standard Penetration Resistance and depth ~ a.. a 400 (") ci._ a t; ~ t; .,: ... -., 5 .,: Cl) "li 0 ~ ..... C) "1:) 0, ~· ] -~ ill El .15' t; ., <:: "li ~ 0 co "1:) .. 0 .. ·a- ct (() Q. ct --a:r:----·-'St' -Cl) -- co 'St' .-N I I I I ~ C/) co (() 53 I 37 7 8 'f'J" ,-., ~ g 6 ~-----~-~ 0 2 2 2 8 6 8 38 34 500 0 0 5 19 3 600 15 10 7 2 4 37 4 2 67 Horizontal Scale 100 Feet Vertical Scafe 30 Faet ----t; ... Q) .,: "li ~ c:, "' "1:) ~ I C, ; _ct _ --~ .... I I co t; r s ~ 0 Cl) u 0 "' I "1:) CJ 0 ·i .. f Q) Cl) (") "' I "' co 8 ~ c:: C/) ~ (.) ., i .s 23 ----___ _...._ __ -- A' 90 60 -30 56 24 . -if --------Fill --I ..... __ ... _... .... -----f-,,,... ____ _ 2 0 ----------- 27 25 700 Shallow Alluvium 800 Lacustrine Deposits 900 1000 1100 1200 0 -30 -60 -90 -120 -150 1300 CX) co 0 > <{ ~ Q) (1) u.. .S C .Q m > (l) w ~ 'O c:i 0 ~ .:. N 8 N 9 r-I ~ Geologic Cross Section A-A' ~~ -2009 PRoJEcrNo. ~ 200 "-·~ 020027 ~ "' Quendall T ermina ls --"™8 F1GuRENo. ~ ::> 60 Aspedconsuwng earth•water WNw espectconsUnng.com Vertical E xaggeration 3. 33X 1 '"'"""" .. 1111,ty'°""'""' I Renton, Wash ington -=•· 2.2.1 ~ 0 • 0 m 0) mo 0) 0 <O 0 (gg 0/\ 'v'N) 1aa:i LI! LIO!)eA a13 0 0 ~ 0 C") ~ ~ "\'-----------~-------.' 1//JON ,L 9 pa1oa{0Jd V'Jt,9-8 --1--11--1--1-- l//f10S .oz P8/08[01d 9-:::>H --·-----.:>-:> UO//:JaS SSO.() UO/J08SJ3/U/--1--~.-i.......l 111JON.09pa1aafo1d 6-Hs_r 89<::-HS --- ~ I _I I r I I I I -I I I I I I I I 111no5,Q<;pa,:,afo1d O~<:)V'J ---1-~t-------- -it 1/IJON .oc pa,:,afOJd £-:)V'J ---1----1...-------- 1//nOS ,OP papa[oJd t, ~ -:)V'J ---~------'----- 111nos m pa1oa[o1d 9 -:)V',!--- ·--· ---I 1//JON ,Oil pa1:>afo1d 8-SMS--•---------- 1/IJON ,i:; I papa{Old 1/IJON ,()<; papa[Old 8-:::>V\I -- 111nos .oi:. p;,pafo1d v ~ -HS -- 0 <O 0 C") 0 i:::-r::- 0 C'; <O <O (88 0 /\ 'v'N) 1aa:i LI! LIO!JeAa13 t t I i cl .. • l 0 ~ 0 C\J ,-. I 5Mp·aaw· aooc:o\80·600Z~1epu.:1norn 0 lO -o 'O C") ,-. 0 0 co 0 0 " 0 0 <O 0 0 lO 0 i Q C") 0 0 (\j 0 0 ,-. 0 0 lO ,-. I C, ~ -!l:1 Cll u Cl) ~g C: -0 "§ :i::: 0 --0 C (l) Cl Q) ....J 0.. .E 0.. ~ Q) 0:: m I m C 0 ·-., (,) Q) "' en en 0 .. u (,) en 0 -0 Q) C) 0 <O -!l:1 Cll u -C/) .. -o : <lJ M -!2 "t:: ~ 0 (/) ro C C _g E Ol .... -~ <1) .c <JI I-(1) -3:: (1J c "O _g C <1) C (l) ::, 0:: a ~ t g, l '5 i g -= l "i l ~ I ~ C") M C: ~ ~ .; (I) .f 8: Cll in ~ t: ~ C 90 .; ~ co in r--al ..... u ' (b 60 I "o' co ct 30 - 0 co co 0 > <X'. z ~ m -30 <I) • LL .£ C .Q iii > <I) w -60 -90 -120 -1500 Refer to Figu re 2.2.1 for Legend m .; .; i al ~ ~ c:, g·i c:, "' I c-, -.,, . .,, ii~ (b ~Q) 0) u ~,u (b ... ' (b co -; i:g I "i5' .s <3 co ct co in: I .; ~ ~ r--al NU 'C, I "i5' co ct ~ ~ 4: UJ -<:: ~ c:g ('1") 't, .o t.) I Q) 13 Q) C:OU .,V> ~-~ ~~ C' 90 .; ~ ~ .,, N.'!! 60 I l;l I "o' co ct --:t --·----.... -- -r I "'~Q. £; 0 MAX V I j I L T~ F-1, I , I .... I I I I -.-:,:::w•30 100 0 0 200 Horizontal Scale 100 Foor Vertical Scale 30 ---~------- 300 200 60 400 500 Shallow Alluvium 600 Deposits 700 800 0 -3 0 -60 -90 -120 -150 900 CX) co 0 > <l'. z Q) <I) LL £ C .Q iii > <I) w ! ci 0 l N 0 0 N 9 co -.----·---··-~ PROJECT NO. Nov 2009 ,5 "ecuon \.#•\.# -= 8 M-1J,l'-'-I.Q11111UIUO§I • "'....,,,, 0 20027 ~ earth+water JLP co Geologic Cro~-,ro, __ ... : __ ,. ,., feer I -wwwaspeclconsu!bngr.om Quenda ll Te rminals -~··~1B FIGURENO. l Vertical Exaggeration 3.33X •• ,..,.., .. Odftycompan1 Renton, Washi ng to n .,_.,. . 2.2.3 & D 90 60 30 0 co co 0 > <( z ....., Q) Q) -30 LL .!: C 0 ~ > Q) w -60 -90 -120 -150 O ! it, .... 't) ., -r- J Lt) ..... I I en I 32 . I 22 ~------43 1g g 100 al I CD .; g ~ c:·-. :2 ~ ~ ~Cl) j i~ :s .!:,<) 'c5' it CJ? u ~ I I r---I y ._..---............... __ 200 t;; ~ ~ 't) ~ -~ it O? en ~ Cf) I ... T/'" 1 0 1 2 -• -5 8 3 3 -- 28 34 23 2 300 • Fill -., ~ ~ -~ . ~ ~ g i ~ -,:, liJ c:, ., ~ $! io J. ~-8} -t3 ~ -<I.) b .~ 'o" "l:J O C\,j ct 0: f3 1 ·~ "g co -~ it ~ U O it = ·e-0 N ~, ll.. ~± ~ ~ I ,.,., a..' I ..-en ~ en ' I I 0 1 . I g; 1?-r I -ps 4 ..... ----------------. . I 16 ----._..------~~---~--- Shallow Alluvium 7 10 25 28 25 400 500 600 Horizontal Scale 0 100 200 10 700 800 900 4 ci C: ~ ., (.I) ] ~ :s i:? i 1000 1100 o· 90 60 30 01-MM (18.677 OLI-\M /16 67J 0 -30 -60 -90 -120 -150 1200 co co 0 > <( z ....., Q) Q) LL !: C .Q ro > Q) w C> ~ ci 0 ~ N 0 ~ 9 Refer to Figure 2.2.1 for Leg en d ,-------------,---------------------------------------------1 9 "' 15 "ecuon u•u -= 8 l"l~t,lll.\oo,QJllll\llU'lV • ,,.,,_,,. 020027 ~ earth+water JLP n, Geologic Cros-,ro, __ .... =--.... ""'' .. N<W2009 PROJECT NO Fee t Vertica l Scale O H 00 Feet I -wwwaspectoonsLltlngcom Que ndall Termin als -~"I'll.a F IGURENO ] , Vertical Exaggeration 3 .33X '""'"""'""'''-"' Rento n, Washington ..,.,.,,. 2.2.4 Q 0 APPENDIX A Existing Site-Wide Geotechnical Data ASPECT CONSUL TING A.1 Existing Site-Wide Geotechnical Data The stratigraphic contacts shown on the individual summary logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types; actual transitions may be more gradual. The subsurface conditions depicted are only for the specific date and locations reported, and therefore, are not necessarily representative of other locations and times. A.1.1 Remediation Exploration Data from recent remediation studies (Anchor and Aspect, 2007b) and data just generated by Aspect was also reviewed. Those selected probe and boring logs that were used in this report are included n this appendix. A.1.2 Geotechnical Borings by Others Data was reviewed from the previous data summary for the Site (Anchor and Aspect, 2007a) from studies by Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Hart Crowser, Shannon & Wilson and Neil Twelker. Additional reports were provided by KPFF from Shannon & Wilson (2006) and CH2M-HILL (1978). Selected borings were used to develop the geologic sections and allow for extrapolation of soil parameters where possible. Those borings are included in this appendix. PROJECT NO. 020027-010-04 • NOVEMBER 11, 2009 A-1 ATTACHMENT A-1 Geotechnical Borings by Others r - \ r ' , I _r_ ·. - f ,~~ ... ~ ' r l [ ~- , -""" I. r- '. w ?,- i:.....t [ ' ,,_ -, r .. __ , [ • , [ ·--f r L r·· .. ' r '--• l . , ;._,., '- L l ( I ,., r r r MASTERLO 'ln/97 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation: Approx. 27 Feet \ Wood chips; (Fill]. ,., Dark gray SANO: moist; (Fill) SP. Wood chips: (Fill), Medium dense, gray, fine SANO: moist; (Fill) SP. Loose, gray, fine to medium SANO and COAL FRAGMENTS. lnterbedded, very loose and very soft, gray, fine to medium SAND and brown, sllghtly clayey, peaty, organic SILT: moist; !scattered roots; SP/OH. ii'. i ... I) 0 f 0.3 r 2.5 3.e ~- ,.o e.s 9.0 -24.0 27.0 Very soft, dark brown, sllghtly clayey, peaty, organic SILT; moist; scattered root hairs; untreated wood at 17 .8 feet; occasional layers of loose, gray, fine to medium SAND; wet at 20 feet; (Depression Fimnal OH. 28.0 : l Stratified, medium dense, gray, slightly ~ 30_0 i: ·1 silty, fine to mellium SAND, trace gravel; , H'i;:w;:e_:;t;~S=P-·=S:.;M;.;·_,.'S-.:.·'::., -~,-,-~-,----....IIH 33.o > Medlum stiff, brown, slightly clayey, .~-· peaty, organic SILT; wet; organics; Depression Filling) OH. · loose, gray, slightly silty, fine to medium SAND; wet; (Depression Filling) SP-SM.· -42.0 Dense, siltY, gravelly SAND; wet; (Coarse IAnuviumJ SM. Stratified, very loose to medium dense, · sffghtly silty to silty, fine to medium SAND and SILT: wet; interbedded organic and wood layers at 37 feet; !Medium IA lluvlum/Depresslon Fililng) SP-SM. Medium dense to dense, gray, clean to I slightly silty, fine to medium SAND, trace \of gravel; wet; (Medium AiluviumJ SP-SM. 55.0 ... ... -:·-:. ~--- ; I . ' ·-· I :-~ . ' : I • ·1 ; I . I 'J • I ~· lnterbedded, dense, light brown to gray, ;• 11.. :s_an_d...,y,..._fi_n_e_, _ro_u_n_d_e_d_G_R_A_v_s._:_w_ei_, __ j •0 - 0 """' • .-:··.··. \!Coarse Alluvium) GP, C0NT1ll1JED NEXT PAGE LEGEND • Samplli Not Recovered .. .. . £m Surface Seal •I •I •I •I •I ·JI 1I "'~ C II :, -5:i: •I¥ •Ii \OI ! ·2 nI cS ,,I 13I ••I ••I ,.I "I ,.I "I .. I :r: 2• 0.0. Split Spoon Semp!o .lC 3• 0..0. Shelby Tubo Samplo 13:::E Annular Soalent GHJ Pie,:omotor Screen ~ Grat.It i, Water Level 1. The 'IJtrotificelion !inn ropr0t.ont tha appraximato bound11tiM b.tweon soil typos .. and tho transition may be gr.duat. 2.. Tho dlscuuion in tha tot of thit ropon i1 no,r:Nc.,.,. for a propor Standard Penetration Resistance 1140 lb. weight, 30" drop) .A. Blows per foot 20 40 6' . -............. . . . . . . . . . . ' ..... . . . . . . . . . ....... . i!~lj~(\! :: 5 .... : : :; : ........ ........ ' )/1:~·; : : ; ; 10 ....... -. ~= :; ; : :: ; . . . . -. . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . : : :; : : : : : 15 : : : : : : : : : 20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ ........ ~!~!~!~~! ~:: ;; ;; ;; . . . . . . . . . : : : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... . . . . . . . . . . .... ' ... . . -...... . . . . . . . . . . ...... --. ......... ....... '. . . . . . . . . . ......... ......... . . . . . . . . . :,; : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . ... ' ..... . . . . . . . . . . ..i/ : : : ; : ; : : : ; : :~: : . ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . ....... ' ......... . . . . . . . . . ......... ......... ......... ......... ..... -... ::, .. ;;;; ......... . ' ...... . . ' .. ·'. . ... ......... . . . . . . . . . : :: ; :: :111: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : : :-66.80· : : : : 167.70 == : : ~;3!1,a ~ . . . . . . . . ' ;~~~~;\~1 . ....... . :"'X.;... . . :....: : : : : : : : ......... ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . . 25 :i:;klJ':::;: ,-:=:::::' ':::::::: :: , ... : : : : ; : : :: ; •= : ; :: :: ::: : : ; ..... : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... -.. 40 ~ i i [ 1 i i i l i l i l i i f ti 1 i j 45 ;: ;: :, :, _;_ ;= N·=,; , , ,., , =,,, : : :, : : : : ; : ......... ::':::'::~:;:::': so lilililff ii:iNii 55 i::::ii} :1:1:1\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... -...... . 60 : : : : : : : : : . : : : : : : : : ..... -........... . . . . . . . . . . . ' ..... '. . . -..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . . ......... ......... : :..: : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . -...... . .......... ......... . ....... . ..... --.. ......... ......... . . . . . ' . . . ......... . . -. . . . . . ......... ......... . . . . . . . . . ......... . -...... . . . . . . . -. . ..... ' ... ' . . . . . . . . ......... ~::::::: . . . . . . . . . ......... . .... ' ... . . . . . . -. . . ..... -.. ......... 0 20 40 60 • % Water Content Plostlc Limit I • I Uquid Um~ Natural Water Content JAG Development Renton, Washington LOG OF BORING SWB-3 December 1996 undomancfina of tho nature 11f 1oubturlKe material,., 3, W.r.ar lwoT. U indiut.d obova. S. fofthe d.i:e ~pcic:ifi&d and m.1v vwy. W-7443-03 4. Refor to KEY far oxplanation of ·Symbols. 11nd dofinit~. 5. USC lcrn.or symbol b•ed an villuo1 d••ifiution. FIG. A-5 Sh~ot'1.of 2 -----------------·---. I ( lf . ' ) l Ir, ' ,. / J "· I 1· '' '' if '· j I I I 11 11, I[ \L IL iL I( !t IL. J --, i ... I ... r .... ].:·· L r ···-,, ... -., r r ·--l MASTEl'ILO '2f7197 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation: Approx. 27 Feet ii 0 .. .s::: .c 'a E -·E C. > ... .. <n <n Q Medium dense to dense, brown, fine to medium SAND, trace of gravel, scattered layers of rounded fine gravel: wet; (Medium Alluvium) SP, : .... ., -.· ~ . ·: -. -·-. .":- ·-. •:: .. :·.- -... •, :· .. ... ·-.· ..... I -::-· 1------~--~=------195.0 :·, Dense, gray, silty fine SAND, trace of fine gravel; wet; (fini,Alluviuml SM. l::-;-;::=:--:=.:--:::::::-c:..:C'.:...;-~C':':'-:::C:c'..'.C---:::1121.0 Very soft, gray, silty CLAY, trace sand; / · 121.5 moist; ML. ._ ___ B"'o'"'n=o~M~O~F~B~O~R"'IN"'G ___ _, COMPLETED 1 1/6/96 LEGEND • Sample Not Recovered X. 2• 0.0. Split Spoon Serriplo J[ 3" 0.D. Shelby Tubo Somplo Surface Seal Annular Sealant Plazometer Scraen Grout Water Level 1. Tha strllli~ca't!m'I rinN npre11.nt the appro:dmate ~ggndarles botwoan. coa types. and the transition may be gr-actual. :· . 2. Th8 dil:Q!aalon In the text of tht• report la necosHry fM • proper undmst•nd'mg of th11 nature of sub&urface materiala. ·. 3. W.tGr love!. if indicated abov .. I• fM the dat11 'SJIRlfied aiid may V•TY• 4. Refer to KEY for oxplal\rion of "Symbofa" end definitions. !5. USC licttarayrmJm bated on visual cl=siflc~on. . ~ .. : ~"ii :, -~J ii .s::: -~ Q ... Standard Penetration Resistance 1140 lb. weight, 30" drop) J,.. Blows per foot ?n -..,, "' : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ ........ . . -..... . . . . . . . . . ........ 70 .. : ::: ::: . . -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. . . : : : : : : : ; : . . . . . . . '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; : : : ~ : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' : : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. . . . . . . . . .. ' ..... . . ....... . . .. ' ... ' . : : : : : : : : : 75 ......... : : : : : : : : : .N ...... . ....... . . . . . ' .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -..... . ........ . . . . ' ... . . ....... -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... . 80 : : : : : : : : : . . --. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . .. -..... . . . . . . . . . --..... . . . ·• .... • • . :"1'"' ••• . . . . . . . . . ........ ' . . . . ... . ' . . . . . . . . . . : : : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . ......... . ....... . . . . . . . . . . : : : : : : : ; : . . . . . -.. . .... ' ... . . ....... . ......... . . . . . . . . . 85 : : : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . -. . . .. . . . . . . . . . -.. -..... . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . . ' .... -... : : : : : : : : : . ....... . ......... . . . . . . . . . ......... -....... . : : : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . 90 : : : : : : : : : ...... -.. .... -. -.. ......... ......... ......... . . . . . . . . -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . . ......... . ....... . . ..... -.. : : : : ; : : : : . ....... . 95 '.:::::::: ....... -. 100 ; : : : : : : : : . ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -...... -. . . . -. . . . . : : : : : : : : : : . : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ;· . -. . . . . . ' : : : : : : : : ~ '\:::::::: :•::':::: ~~1/f~lii ~~~~~i~~~ i !'.~~~~\ ........................... 105~.~;;-;~;~;~;-:~;~;r;~;-;-;-;~;~;.-:;-+--;~;r;-:-;,~: ;~;-'-'; : : : :_ : : : : ~ ; : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ; : : : : : : : : -: : : : : : .................. -. ' . -.... 1 W ri""i "'"; "'-i ;-; "'"( -'( (+'-i -'( ('-'-(-j "'i ('-'-j-'-i +"j,,.--'-: +-, '"'( (--'-: .;...: :....c.i; i 115 iiHi:iii !!HZ :1::11:1: i I I 1 ! I LrD i \ : 1 \ 1 : it i 1 1 , : i 120 ... /:: : :.: : : : : : : .:.';: '(;~.!); ~=:::::: : :·:: ~:::; :: : : : : : : : . . . . . -. . . . . . . . . . . . ............... ' .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. . . . . . -. ' ..... ' .. . . . . . . . . . ' .... -... : : : : : : : : : 1251--::-:-:-:-:-:-::-1-:-:-:-:-:-:-:·-.:-+-:-:-:-:-:·-.:-:-1: : : : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. . . . . --. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . ... -.... : : : : : : : : : ... -..... . . . . . . . . . ... -.... ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... . ......... -. . . . . . . . . . ' ..... . . . ' . . . . . . 0 20 40 60 • % Water Content Plastic Limit I • I Uquld Limit Natural Water Content JAG Development Renton, Waslllngton LOG OF BORING SWB0 3 · December 1996 W-7443-03 SHANNON &. WILSON, INC. I FIG. A-5 ~and EmWWMni.l ~ Sheet 2. of 2 MA&TERUI 2/7'97 . MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ,i ci J 1~ ,i Standard Penetration Resistance i l '! j (140 lb. weight, 30' drop) ~' .a. Blows per foot Surface Elevation: Approx. 25 Feet Q Q " ~" .,, 601 Gray, sandy GRAVEL; mom; 1FIIII GW. . ..... ' ..... '. ...... ' .. ,-... . . . . . . . . . . . ........ • ..... . .... '•.• . ........ •::':: ........ . . . . . . . . . 2.& ?,.l •I : :: : : :.:.:A,: .... '.' .. ......... Dense, gray, gravelly, fine to madlum ... ' .... . . . . ' ... . .. r 4,0 r : . . . . . .. ~.:::: .... . . . . . \ SAND: dry: sl~ht sheen and odor; IFl111 5 . . . . .. . . . . .... •I :£ .. :: ......... : ..... SP, . . . ' . . . . . . . . •. I : : : . : : : : i . . . ' ..... : ........ . . . . . . . . . ........ .Loose, gray, allghtly clayey, allghtly silty •I ........ . . . . . . . . . : . ....... . . ' ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' ..... . ....... to silty SAND; moist; scattered to 9.5 I ........ . . . . . . . . . ........ f 10 . . . . . . . . ......... ..... •.•..:. numerous wood fibers: slight odor; IFIIQ •I ~:::::::: ......... : : : : :·:·: ! . i : : : : : : : : : ' . . . . . . . . SP•SM, :~:: ::: : : :::~:::: . . . . . . . . . •I ......... . . . . . . . . ........ Soft and very loose, brown, sightly . . . . . . . . . ' ....... . ....... . . . . . . ·-. . . . . . . . . . ........ I 15 ......... . . . . . . ·--' ....... clayey, sandy SILT, sUghtly clayey, peaty, •I . . . . . . . ..... ' .. : : : : :(&p,2 18.0 "' . . . . . . . ..... ' ... organic SILT, and gray, fine to madlum '' ...... : : : : : : ; : : ,J[ C . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... SAND: molst; numerous wood fibers; f ........ ' . . . . . . . . ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ '' . . . . . . ......... . ....... ' (t)apreulon Flllng/Madlum Alluvfuml 20 '' . . . . '. . . . . . .... ; ; ; ; ~~~~~ •I . ' ... ' .. : :•:::;::: SM/SP. P';::::::: . . . . ' .... ' ..... ' .. r 22.0 . ' ...... :::::::.: ......... Very soft, brown, slightly clayey, peaty, .... . ' ' ........ •I . . . . . . . ......... .. : : : : : ; : : . " " .... ' . . . ' . . . . organic SILT: molat; numerous wood . ' : ;..,;.,: : : : . . -.. .... 25 . . . . . . . . . ' ... .... fibers; (Depression FDllng) OH. ••I . . . . ... : : : : :-: : : : . " . .... .... '' . . . . ' . ... 28.5 . ' ..... . ' . . . . . ......... Gray, lmarbedded, 10ft and very loose, :::: '' . . . . . . .. ' ...... '' .. . ' . . . . . '. .. ,-, ..... 11I . . . . . . . . . . ' ....... sDty Ci.AY and ,Utv, fine SAND; wet; .... . ........ . ..... ' .. •:•: . ' .. . . . . . . . . . ........ ..... . ' ...... . ' . ..... scattered arganllll; (Lacustrlna Deposit) :•:• ••I 30 :lr:.:: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •:•: ....... ....... ' ' CUSM. . . . . ' ... ' . ' . ...... ' .. ' .. .. 32.0 ""' . . . . . . . . ::•'':::: . ' ..... ' . . . . . . . . . . ' ....... Medlurn dense, gray, gravely, fine and · .. 13I ... ' -.... '' 33.5 . . . . . .... . . . . . . '.' ...... .. . . ' . . . . . : . ...... '. fine to madlum SAND, traca of silt; wet; . . . . . . . . . . . . ' ... ......... ' .. I .. I 35 ~"""" ..... ... '' ..... (Coarse ADuvlurnl SW. . . . . . . . ' . ..... ... . ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ . . . ' ..... . . . . . ... .. : : : : : :: Loose, gray, fine ta madlum SAND, trace "I :,::::::: . . . . . ' ... ' ....... . . . . . . ... ... '.' ... n \Of silt; wet: (Medium AlluvlumJ SP. 39.a . . . . . . . ' . ...... ... ' ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... -.... ' " ... 40 . .... . .. ' ... .. K ..... . .... '.' Very loose, brownish-gray, fine sandy :·: ' . . . . . . . . . . . . ''. ..... ''' ' ....... ' . . . . . . . ' SILT with fine to medium SAND lenses, 42.0 .,... '' .. ' ... ' . . . . . . . . ' ' . . . . . . ' . . . . . . " . ......... -::: ' ....... ........ ..... ' ... trace of organic silt and fine organics: . . . . . . . . . . . . . ''. . ... .'·: . ' ...... . . . . ... . . . . . . .... . ' .... ' .. . ' . . . . " . ......... wet; (Fine Alluvium) MUSP. .. : "I 46 '":tN ''' . . . . .... ... . . . . . . . . . ........ ........ . Medium dense to dense, greenish-grey, ... . . . . . . . ' . '' ... ' .. ''' ... . ...... .. ' ...... . . . . . '. . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . fine gravelly, fine to coarse SAND, local -:·-:. "I ........ ~:)) . ' '.' " ' ...... '. . '' .. ' ''' ' . . . . . . . . . . ' . ..... 11raca of silt; (Coarse Alluvium) SP. ,, . . . . . . ' . . ' .... ' ... ••I 50 ' ...... .. ' ...... !,?:::::: ... .. ' ...... . . . ' ..... lnterbedded, madlum dense to dense, -:·-:. . . .... ' . . . . . . ' . . ' ...... : : : : :: •= . . . . . . . . . . ..... "j2 . '' ...... greenish-gray, graveUy, fine to medium, ,• ••I . . . . . ' .. . . . . . . . .. •::: .. ...... ' . . . . ' . ... ...... fine to coarse SAND, trace of sUt; wet; ... ...... '... . . ' . . . . ..... . . ' ...... . . . . . . . . . . ' . ..... gravel lens at 47 to 48 feet: SP/SW. -:·~ . .. I 55 : : : : ::• . . . . . . . ' ... ..... . . . . . ... . . . . .... ''' . . . . . ... . . . . . ... 57,0 ~ ~:::: . . . . . .... Medium dense, gray-brown. fine to '' ...... . . . . ' ... ... ••I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ,.· . . . . . . . . . ~::::: ... ..... .... medium SAND,&r;,cs,(lf .Jl!lt, ~ocally fine ..... ... ' ..... . . . . . . ... . . . . ' . . . . ... " LEGEND 0 20 40 61 • % Water Content • Sample Not Recovered [!IJ:J Surfaoa Sea1 Plaotlo Limit I • I Uquld Limit ::r: 2" 0.0. Sp6t Spoon Somplo §[Ill AMular Sealant Natural Water Content JI: 3" 0.0. Shelby Tube Somplo tEl Plazometar Soreen 13::ll:1 Grout i Weter Level ' JAG Development •, Renton, Washington NOTES ' 1. The stratlftoetlon Ono, ':rJ"ent the, •pproxll'l\fde boundariN batwun •oil typol. and the trana on mav b• gradual. LOG OF BORING SWB-48 2. The dlecuaslon In the tolC't of thl1 ropart ts necenerv for a p,op.,. underwtancfnt of th• naturo of ,ubsurl'ace materlal,, December 1996 W•7443-03 3. Water lovcil, lf Indicated abow, I• for the date 1p111cJfled end may \'11ry. 4. Ref ct to KEV for explenatlon af •9yf11bole" and deDnltlon1, SHANNON & WR.SON, INC. I FIG. A-6 &. USC latter 1ymbot be .. d on Ylluel clasefflcldon, G~ and EnffilrMleldtl Corwulllntl Sho!)I 1 of 3 L L r ., _, J._·-- r .... k'" [ a:· L t r r_ r 1... ( . Jr. !• L [ J- :..., r. ' ~ ,~ ... r ~" [ : ,_ ,. ,. . .. , f , ... L .. " . ' L ~- I :.... L P':~ .. , L ( L (" ~ L . : -~ L. ,., .. L . ,. MATl:RIAL DESCRIPTION Surface Elavatlon: Approx. 25 Faet ,i 0 ii 1 i" Q ... . .. sano; wet; (Medium Allwroml SP, :._. ·.: .. . ... ·> ... ::-· :•: ?/ JII ;1-.,..,...,,.......,;..;.,...,._,,=,,....,==-===--1 70.0 >i:'. ..,I Medium densa to densa, gray, gravouy, • fine to coarse SAND end sandy GRAVEL, \ · 21 I trace cf .lilt; wat; [Coarse AllUvluml GP/SW, ··. .. -:-:.: , h==========;;;---i 82.0 i Moulum dense, gray, fine to medium r\ SAND, trace of slit; wet: SP, / 84,0 t-;-. •," Very dense to med!tJm densa, gray, fine to -:·-; medium SAND, t,aca of silt; wet; slit lense ,. • . et 88 feet and ptterad trace of wood ··• r, fraornentsi (M,illi~m Alluvium) SP. • / eo.o '!:'.· Medium dense to dense, Dl'BY, slightly silty :• .• to 1ll1Y fine SAND, scattered organics a.nd • i silt lenses; wet; (Fino Alluvium) SM. aa • :;: hMri .. 1::r.,..,1u::m~di;;e;:;:ns=e~t;;o~di:;e;:ns;::o~.=-igi""I~, tra;;;;:c;;e;-;t;;;o:----J · t· slightly silty, lino SAND; wet; scattered }; !Ina wood and organics; [Fine Alluvium) ·.: •• SP/SP-SM. :,; • .. : .. ... ... ·> . .:--. ... ,:·,:. .. ... ··' f-========-=====r,;;;-; 113.0 ,· ... Medium dense to dense, gray, slightly silty to silty, fine SAND; wet; scattered fine organics and 1 /4·lnch ant layersi [Rne AIUlrl~m) Sf'.SM/SM. ""'"' ...• LEGcND "'I .. I • lhmp1e Not Rocovel't:d :::C 2• O.D. Split Spoon Sample :n: a· O.D, Shelby Tuba Sample ec:B IIIE llE:I llDlil ~ Surfaca Saal Annular Sealant Pfezometor Sorom GrDllt ;:.' Water Level . ~ ', . 1.1he Watihatlon Dnn ttJ)lctent the approxtm•• boundarln berween ntr typ~ .-nd the tranafllon 1119'( N ~dill:· , .2.,·The ~•tkiD Tn di, te>ct. af thr.·~.11 neoHIIUY for a prDJRI'" • · und~ of 'tho natuM af ~111matarllla. • S:.. W.W, lfv.a. ti tmnc11,t.d llbcw." ft for th• date 1ptcld&d: and may vary. 4. Rtf«lo 1,~ for eHJll•nllllon ot •sym111i!1• .at dot;i!f1Gn1. s. USC lttttr ~mbot b .. t4 on Yl1(ftl ll••l~catlol\~ ' . ' Standard Penetration Roslstance 1140 II. wel;ht, 30" drop) A Blows per foot "'"' Al\. Rt' . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... -.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... . 1HH/H 1~1'HiH i.,.'=.:U:.:!U . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... 85 ·::::··:: :· .:::::: ::::::::: 111 ill l t~ fr 1 H H 1 n inn i 1 70 :::::::::~:::::: ::::::::: o • • • • • o • • • 0 • o o • • o o o o o o I o ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ' . • • • • • • • • • o o o O o o o • o • • • o o I o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ' . : :: :: : :::,: :: : :;':-srrtf:::: :::::: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ' . 75 ···•····· ......... ~ ..... . ::::::::: ::::0::::: .:::::::: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ . .......................... ::,,::::;..::: ::::·.;:: ::::::::: 80~:c:.:.,.,:::.;:-1~.1-:.:c;.:;-·~.~i,,."':,-:-.~ .. :-:-.+.:.;.-;-.-:-: .. -:-.-:-, .. :-:-t. . ........ : ..... : : : : : :: : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... . ::::,:::, :::::::::r-<-l::::::: ········· ·········\::~"''' 86 ................. ' '.. . .. ' HHHH/ HHH~H HHH~TI ::::::::: ::::::::: :.,,.:_,_:.:u .... ......... :::~:;:;: 90 ... '..... . .......• lllllll~ \1!11H1/ H\11:llf 95i..:..:...:..:.:..:..:.:~·:.;·.,.·:-:··:.;·.,.,··:.;·+:-: .. -:-.7'.,;-;-.-;-,.;-;-.I l!Hi!Hi1filill/1 HHHIH ;;;;;:;:;. ;+~;;~;;;:; ;~;;;;;;;; 100 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ::::::::: ;::::.::: ~ni~;~~; 1os~;c;.;.;.:;;c:.;.,.,:;:.;;.,.,;i--;;.,-;~:-::i'<:-,;:.;;-,.;:--1; -:-:-:-:,,-:-:'"::7::-:'1:: : : : : : : ~ : : l : : 1 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : . . ~ ' . . . . . ':: .·,. -·:. ': ·': ::, :,. ·,·. _::, I 11 I I I 11: I:::\:::: ,,o,f-'-'::.,.:.,.:::-::..:.:.,.::-1: .,.:··nm:c-::-:'.'<"· 1 ::.;::.;:+:-: .. -:-.-;-.:-; .. -:-.-:-.. ~, iiuiiui ,.:_;.:;_·:,:_ .. 1:1:··:_1.'_ irniin ::::::::: ::::::::: 1151-'-'_._.~,..:._.~_.-'-•• -'-•••• ~,+;.~.;..,.; .. ~.7.7.~.~.~.-:-.~.-:-.~ .• :-;,c:-.I li\H!!H tHt{\: HHHU\ ::::::::: ·:::::::: ....... .. O ,J 40 60 • % Water Content Plallllo Limit I • I Uquld Limit Natl.Ire! Wato, Content JAG Development Renton, Weshlngton : .. ,. J;,_OG OF BqRING SWB-4B December ~996 W-7443-03 SHANNON· & WILSON, INC. .1 ~,lJllll~CIIMIII-•I, ...... AG.A-6 Sh .. t 1of 3 ---. l , C 1 r ' .. , r. - [ -~ k . [ i- [ t:· r '·-I" L. [" ~- L., [ f.-:- ~ r. J.·- ' ~ [ ': . ·-"' [ -· ~· L ~ L ...... i... l. ,I. • ' ... , L t • r l ' ' I' (--~ r L MASl'l!Rl.Q 211"1 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ~ a i 1 Surface Elevation: Approx. 25 Feet ti!! $1 • m stiff to Stiff, gray, allty LAY, 123.D : laminated, looally dlstotted and 129.0 • ..I allckansldecl1 fine sanely allt lenses locany; Wat; Clacustrlna Olposltl CL, Stiff to medium stiff, gray, silty a.A Y; Wat 11.acustrlne Deposit) CH, -Dense to very dense, gray, sllty fine SAND, trace of otganlcs and gravel and silty fine sandy GRAVEL (angular and part!ally weathered]J wet; !landslide or Mudflow Depos~ SM/GM. <. .,,_ ·, BOTTOM OF BORING COMPLETED 11/27/96 . '. • samPta Nol Racov11N1d :C 2• O.D. SpDt Spoon S~pJ11 JC 3" 0.D, ShelbyT•b• Sampfa l. . ,:,-.. ' wm .. I ""I .. I GI ·., . ., . .... ) SiqfaceS.o~.' • . .Annul1r·s~·111nt Pl~.rn(litr Screen o,'61:ati-' . .- w.;~r-i.ave1 . :·:,· 1. Tho-df[ollltJ'on Inn re~ecentthe ap~ato boundortoa between aaU tn, "* ..,d the tran1hfon may b• Gfed'ual. 2. Tho dkc:u1alon ti 1he tllXC nf th1I taPGrt la. naa~ far• proper und•rataftlffng of the nl!ltllre of au!iiurfaoe materl.J•. . 3. Weter level, If lndfcltfld' abovt, i• for th• i:tat.apaatfftd and may very. 4. Rilf• ti, KEV' for explanirtion af •sv,nbota" Md dolfit11Jim1, &, use laUer •vmbo1 bMod cin v1111tl o1•rBalldl'on.: 125 135 140 145 150 Standard Ponotratlon Reaiatance (140 lb, Weight, 30" drOJl) 4 Blows·per loot ......... .. . . . . . . . ......... ' ....... . ' ....... . ......... .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ......... ......... ......... . . . . . . . . . ......... . ....... . ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . /H!fHH ......... ......... . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . . 0 IO' oo • o o . . . . . . . . . ......... ......... ......... . . . . . . . . . 0 Io• o' o o o , == = =-iir : : : : : ~!>i~ . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... '.' . ....... . ..... ' .. . . .. . . . . . . iiiiii\T'~\ ..,.:~::..,.:~it..,.1~11~~~~ .................. . . . . . . . . . . .. ' .... . . . . . . ' . . . . ....... . . . . . . . . . . . ....... . 165 ,: :_ =. =. :. :, '· •.· :. . . . .. . . . . '· :. :, :. :. :. :. : : : : : ~ :,: : ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... '• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . '·' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' ... . 160 :·' :. '._: :_: '._: ;_ ;, :. :. ; \: \;;: '..'. ', ;_ ! .. :: : .. ;_ : : : ; : ·:·: : : ·:::::;::: ......... ::::::: ..... ' . . . . ....... . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . 166 ri"':j..,.j"'jjc:-j-:-j:"'\j-t-;-,j!'"'.j.,..l"'ijc:-j-:-j:~j .,.j"'jjc:-j-:-ji'"[j:-:--:-1 170 r.ic;i.,-i '"j i,.,i.,.i .,.,i tc-r.:-:-: :--:· ;:-:-;-:-; :--:; ;:-:;-t-:--:( :,.,:.,.: "'/'"';~• ......... o 'o o, •.• • • I'' o • • •• • • o' o . . . .. . . . . . . . ..... . 175~;c..:.;.:.:;;c..:.;.:..:;;:--;;-i';l-"-'-~~-'+:::-:c::"':..,.11"'1-i':-I :·~: : : : : : : : : : : ! : : :n~J-_:::: :: :::::: ;.:::::: 0 20 40 . • 'l6 Water Content PluUo Limit I • I Uquld Limit. Natural Water Content JAG Development Renton, Washington LOG OF BORI.NG SWB-4B December 1996 . W-7443-03 RG.·A-6 Sl>••tS of 3 I l L r . -~ .C··· \ ~ S--- ~ . [ 1·· [, ·r f 1-r I..., ( ~:- i ·~ r '-r I ~ r t--·-,. ·- ( ·-r . , I \ ~ [ ,. ....... r -~ L ~ L.. L l- ,:.-.:- L, ~-.... ..• . [ [ L ·---- 'MASTERL.0 2/7197 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation: Approx. 25 Feet Brown, slightly silty SAND; moist; SP·SM. Medium stiff, light gray, slightly sandy, gravelly, clayey SILT; moist; chalky odor; (FiD • Kiln Dust7l ML ,i ~ -0. .. C 2.0 1-~~---,-----=--:e===::-:-----t 9.0 Very loose to loose, gray, slightly silty, fine to medium SAND; wet at 10 feet; lenses and pieces of slightly silty, clayey silt: wood fiber at 12.5 feet; (Fill?) SP-SM. _ Very soft, brown, slightly clayey, peaty, organic SILT, lenses of gray, fine to medium SAND and fine sandy sUt; wet; (Depression Filling) OH, 15.0 1-.,.....~~.,..-.,--,-,..,----,,===--:::=--J 26.0 lnterbedded, soft to medium stiff, gray, clayey, and fine sandy SILT and loose to very loose, gray, slightly silty, fine to medium SAND~-x,,et; (Depression Filling/Medium ldluvlum) MUSM. 1-===-======-==-::;;:=;:-:-----i 35.0 Medium dense to dense, gray, slightly silty, sandy, fine to coarse GRAVEL; wet; 0 J:, E in .. I • I :~ •· I • creosote odor; cobbles at 39 feet; (Coarse t Alluvium! GP-GM. • r • ,1-====-===-=r=:-::=====--J 42.0, ~-I,: Very loose, gray, clean to slightly silty, . 1 fine to medium SAND; wet; slightly : J gravelly at 45 feet; faint creosote odor; :.: t oxidized sell at 47.5 feet; (Medium Alluvium) SP-SM. • I .' 'I " :=.~ 1-:--:-:c:-:c=====-==-=::r==----i 51.0 Loose, sHghtly clayey, silty, fine SAND; ''l u.o r'\ ~x!dlzed; no creosote odor; (Fine Alluvium) I \sP-SM. ·.·: ··.·: Loose to medium dense, gray, fine to h medium SAND, trace silt; wet; (Medium r se.o Alluvium) SP. i-;e---,-'---;:c--,-----==--;='rl 81.0 Loose to medium dense, gray, sandy, fine Ito coarse GRAVEL; wet; (Coarse Alluvium . ; CONTNJ£D NEXr !"AGE LEGEND. ... ~ . ' • ·1 : .I • I •I •I •I •I •I •I •I •I •I ,oI nI ,,I ,,I .. I ,.I 10:r "I ••I ,.I '°I "I 2.2:r »I ••I • Semple Not RecovorDd ::C :I." O.D. Split Spoon S..mplo J[ 3" o.O. Shelby Tub, ~mnplD I3JZI" ~urf1ce Se1I 9:E A,,nular ,Sealent GR:l Pioz.oTT'lol.~r.~~een ll:!J2I Grout · ~-Weter Lovet' . "·;·.-. '· NOTES · 1. 'Jho -.tratifiution lin• repr•ant the apprt»eim.to boundariN betwoon · •CHI typN. and tho tran11rtion IIIUIY be gradual. 2. ih11 di•'ct-don In tha t•Jd of thi, r..port 11 n.c:M&ary for a propw understan.di"'1 of the natur11 of fllbsurfaoa materfala, 3. Watoi' levct ff lnd"u,atlKI •bova. Is far the date speclflecl end moy vary. 4. Refer to KEY fot ~anatian of "Symbols .. end dofiraitions. 5. use letter symbol baaed on vfaual dM:alflcation. ¥ J 'c 0 .. C "§ C Standard Penetration Resistance (140 lb. weight, 30" drop) A. Blews per foot 2n 40 Al . . . . . . --......... . ::::::::: !~\~;~~~~ ......... : : : : : : : : : :: :: :1i2il,EI , ......... ......... ': ': ': ': "· ,_ ... ·, '.·. ', ........ . z: ::::::::: 5 ~)..:,;.a=-:..:.+~::~:~:~::~:7:~:~:.-7:_.~:_.;:-:-1;fM• : : . : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ;:i::L:\ :;i:iini 1::1n?1i 1 ---. . . . . -·....... . ....... . 101-o!" ...... -....... . Jl\l:ll! lt\H:n: 15 ........ . ~:::::::: ......... . ' ...... . ... : ; : : : : ; : : 20 : : : : : : : : : ~:;:;:::: : : : ; : : ; : : .. -..... . : : : : : : : : : ......... . . . . . . ' . . : : : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . '. -..... \ .... " .. : : : : : : : : : . : : : . : : : ....... " . . . . . . . : : : : : : : : : : 25 ([)···:_(:(_.(_(_.\_·). =:~IL~=: ::::·· .:: : : .. : : : : : : : : .. : : : : 30 :·. ::: :: : •........ . . : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ;:;;::::; '=•=='=' : : : : : : ; : : ......... 55 =::4s::=:::: ::i:,:i:: : : .. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : .... : =~:::::; 60 ........ . . . . . . . . . . ......... : : : : : ; : : : : ; : : : : : : : : :~::::: ' ....... . ' ....... . . . . . . . ' . . ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... -..... . . . . . . . . . ......... ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : : : :·.; ~ !·: ' ....... . ; ; : ; :1~~;1(1, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : : : :ail~' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : : : :.:.;.:.:_ . . . ". ;c.,l·. : : : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... : ; :-: : : : : : ......... ......... : : : : : : : : :• ......... ;;~~~-~~1 ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . ~ .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . . ......... ' ....... . ....... '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... ......... . . . . . ' ... ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... . . . . . . . . . .... ' .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . ' . . . ' ...... . '' ...... . . ' ...... . ' ....... . ......... ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : : : : : : : : ...... ' .. ......... ......... . . . . . . . . . 0 20 40 60 • % Water Content Plestlc Limit l • I Liquid Limit Natural Water Content · JAG Developmen_t Renton, W8shingti:in LOG OF BORING SWB-8 · December 1996 W-7443-03 . SHANNON & WILSON. INC. I RG. A-8 Gtolaehnlcal n ~.a eon.A91\l:11 Sheet 1 of 2 -··--·--·--·· -·----··-··--··-·-····-·-· --·----·------·------·-··-·····-. r f [ r· r [ ( [ [ r [ L t L L ,. '' ~- ' /..··· . ' ·- ~-. r r l C MASTERLG 2/1197 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION i 0 ., " Surface Elevation: Approx. 25 Feet ,= .0 -E a. > .. "' C D. .E ... "' \GP. I ., 201_ Stratified, medium dense, gray and brown, trace of silt to silty, fine to medium SAND and silty, sandy GRAVEL; wet; (Medium and Coatse Affuvluml SP-SM/GM. Stratified, very dense to dense, gray, graveny, fine to medium SAND, trace of silt, and gray, sandy GRAVEL; wet; (Coarse Alluvium) SP/GP. 83.0 .I t L I ; ,I .. t :"'( :,11, t : I I . I : L I ~-... ··. -::.· :·.- 1--:-----:;:-c-:-,-:--::,,--:;:==-=-101.0 i' Dense, gray, fine to medium SANO; wet; ·· · (Medium Alluvium! SP. '•. :· _ .. ... .. : ... • .. .. ..... • .. . .. .. · :·: l-----===~====~-----1121.s,::..: BOTTOM OF BORING COMPLETED 11/15/96 LEGEND 21I "'I Sample Not Recovered I 2· 0.0. Split Spoon Somple Jr 3• 0.0. Shelby Tube Sample Surface Seal Annular Sealant Piezometer Screen Grout W11terlovot 1. The ctratlfu:atlon Unn represent the •PProxknilt:e boundlll'fes botw1111m . •~ 'tYPOCt c'1i:1 tho tr••ltion may ba Ql'.Bduel. 2. Tho dlscuadon ln thD text af this repqrt Is nDCOllllllf'Y 0 tor. proper undmrtan~ Qf the nature of 11ub.urfaco mat mar.. · · ~.-Wtlf.w 19Vel.. Tf Jndieetcd •bc,.ve, le for tha date speeifiod and may very. 4. Rofu to KFt' for 11xplenetion of ·symbar.• •nd def11nitiim11. 5. USC-letter ayinbol bosed on. visual dainification_. · 1! ~ :, -~~ ., ... ,= -a. .. C 70 Standard Penetration Resistance (140 lb. weight, 30" drop) "' Blows per foot 0 20 40 '" ::::::~: :=,:::::: :::::=::: : :-: : : : : =°' : : : : : : : : : -: : : : : : : : . . . . ' . ' . . . . . . . . . . ' . ' . . . . -. . : : : : : : : : : ~ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . --. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' ... :~ ..... .. -..... -.. : ; : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . ... ' ..... . . . -. . . . . ' ....... . 75 : : : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . ....... ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' .. ......... . ....... . ......... . ....... . . . . . . . . . ' so~:-:-:"-:-::-:-:"-:+"--::~:-:-:-::~:-+-'-:.:.:~::-:-:-:.:.:'-': ~~~~!~(~~ ~Li=~~~\ ~~~'.ii~~i ::::::::: :::.::.~· ::::::::: 85 : : : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 : : : : :-: : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . ' . 95 : : : : : : : : : ......... ' .... ' ... ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... ' .... . . . . . . ' .. . . . . . . . . . : : : : : : :s~ ' ......... ......... . ....... . . ....... . . . . . . . . . . : : : : : : : : : : : : ; : : :~~.,. :i::ii:::!!:::0 : :: ;: :: ii lvf::,;,: i:I : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : .. : : : : : : :. ................. ' ........ . 100,1-::~:~::~::7:~::~:~·~::~::~;~~·,:r:7::~:~::7::'-'--I: Ii/it\\\\ \/f~H\1~ ~iii~iii! ..................... ' ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1051-::-,-:.,-: :c: ::-::-,-:.,.: ,.,: r.:.,-: .,-: cc: :-:-:-:-: -:-::-1-'1· .,-· cc· ·-,-·-:-· .,-· c:· ·-1 i:11:11:1:11::::::1R1iii! ::::1:1::::::1:1:1:1 :i:1::::::::1:::: :i:~i:1::1::::::1: ::::::::' ::::::':: "::,::':' ......... . ' ...... ' . . . . ' . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' ' . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12s;..:..:::..:.:.:..:-=-:::...::..:.:.:.:+-':..:.:..:.:.:.:'-::..:.:..:.:.:.:+-':r.:"-:'-::..:.:..:.:.:.::..i: . . . ' ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ' ...................... . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' ...................... . ... ' .......... ' ... ' ... ' ... . ........................... . . . . . . . . . . .... ' . . . . ....... . 0 20 40 • % Water Content Plast;o Unlit I e I Uqu;d Lknit Natural Water Content JAG Development Renton, Washington l,OG OF BORING SWB-8 60 Decembe, 1,996 W-7443-03 SHl>,NNON &. WILSON. INC. I G~~ W &wnn-tal Canlu1tanta , FIG. A-8 Sheet 2. of 2. 40 26.4%-101 ••• '29.0%-96 i N=I 164-So/o-.35 N" 4 26.l o/o-10 I N,.. 17 42.Z %-"[2 N•S 0 21.4%-105 N=l!!l 9.4"/o-131 N=40 ·~.!i'%-t2! N:70 4,8%-1'2.I N::.40 N=70 7.90/o-lH N c ta lf,ld" -II 8 153'%-114 N ='10 N• 40 N~ 80 12..3%-120 -50 N ,..50 ~t;,%->04 23.0% 21.3%-106 -70 2Q.0%-10e thlOO BORING 64M LOCATION• Sto. 35 '38 ( 20' LI.) ELEVATION• 31.7 DATE DRILLED 1-11 to 16-63 BROWN AND GRA"( SANO ANO SILT WITH GRAVEL AND 006ANIC MATTER -FlLL, 50ft TO MODERATELY FIRM MOTTLED BROWN~GRAY VERY FINE SANDY SILT WITH FINE" SAND LENSES -SO~T INTERBEOOED BROWN PEAT, PEATY SILT, SILTY FINE SAND AND GRAY FINE-MEO. SANO IN LAYERS-SOFT ANO LOOSE CAS1N8 AT EL. l 1, BOA ING AT EL 7, OVERl'IIGHT WATER LEVEL Ar EL 1'3.4 GRAY ~ILTY VERY FINE SANO GRAY SAND AND GRA\/EL WITH SOME SIU' GRAY FIN.E -MEO. SAND GRAY GRAVEL WITH COARSE SANO-CLEAN SROWN SAND ANO GRAVEL BROWN FINE-MED. SANO WITH SOME SANOY GRAVEL LAYERS -DENSE COHTAtNS TILL AND FIRM CLAY FRAGMENTS BROWN t1Nt-VERY FlN.E SAND WITH SOME SILT AND SANLT'I" Sll.T LAk41NATIONS-DENSE BROWN~GRAY F1NE -MEO. SAND -DEN!3E, CLEAN OVERNIGHT WAfER LEVEL 4T El. .16 l ~te Drille~ ·~·pe of Sor 1ng : · rnrner Weight ·' ; ~ ;;: • 0. ' ~ ~ e • ;; 0 0 • "' ., 0 -- - - - 2 56 - s-3 24 -.. 4 8 -.. -5 14 - . IO- . " -. _ 6 2 7 IS- - - - -7 25 20- . - ' - PORT QUENDALL Renton, Washington 4" Hal low S~e-:i Auger MATERIAL Surface-E1e"a~ion 23. 4 FILL Log of Remarks DESCRIPTION D.002 Waodchips and Aggregate Boring No. Bl-+ .:t >- t_; 0 -' 0 :i: >- -' ,, <; C ,\ 1--------------------1 , r <.., /'~ '; C 0.93 4.8 SANDY SILT (ML) A 01 iv~ ... gray, occasional grave.l.-1erises, distinctive HC odor through9<Jt( l ' ...... T BeCO!"'"!eS T less sandy / / ( . '-":·" "' .. , ... > '., - --- --- --- - ----- 0.002 Water l\li th some organ{: deb!(, --:: = ~_.sz_~'-----------------~ 0.001 0.009 J, SIL TY SAND (SM) -~ Medi ur-to "f0 n~ , .. ._i~Q7; silt , frequent peat lenses,'·.some ·,distiF1Ctive odor . \/. - )-Peat I ens / ,_. / ~ I J J" ) --· ( "\ . .., ~ Peat lens '--soTTOH OF . ,,,,· .._ \ ' \ ·- BORING ;: 19 • 5' --- --- --- - - --- - - ,_ - - . .0 u > 0. C -L-- .l: u C ' N 0 u > 0. C .I: u C ' N -- Proj, L No. 90029A I Woodward·Clyde Consultants Appendix A-1 HC004701 pr O j e ct : PORT QUENDALL Log of Boring No. gu-2 Renton, Wa<hington ~ate Drdled Ma~ 17, 19a3 Remarks 1ype of Boring 4" Hollow Stem Auger •. 1,n,rnnier Weight ..... ' • ;;: ; >-~ • • <.:) . .;, . ..... ;; i ;; .MATERIAL DESCRIPTION C -& E • ..J -< 0 ~ . --• 0 u C ... ' ;: • "' Ill • :i: 0 u ... - Sudace Elevat:Ol"i 20.8 ..J FILL -- 1 52 < ----Si It, Gravel and black .. -;:r ( .. organic. debris 1)'_o~ -u-:-----" (SM) fl C: --"' -SILTY SAND ---. ..c 2 33 0.002 Olive-gray, damp, occasiona!, .'"" u > -lenticular gravels and pea_f ~'-. -•. o._ interbeds ... "/ .... s-' .. , .. --C 1--3 8 0.003 V --Water " - ..5L /) --.c --·z -u - I C: -I . -4 Li 4 ·' /' / --·--< I . (, / . -N --~< -. ' -----5 27 < ' ·. -·,. .. ·' ,.---<----------~ '· --- \ '";:-.::.·----- '10--\·/ ~-~/ -- . '\.·:: /" ----.. <, ---. - ,,,,,.--....., fl= -\/ J'/"t"\ l -c, ----dJ - ,' ) --, ,-... -~ - ~ ----(' ', .. / / ..... '·---...../ 0 ---6 10 0.001 JP~a0 .___ "' -. ... ::.:-:.:::.. u --c.::.= > -,,,..--,/ o._ -15---< ·r C -.. - ' -----I -.c -~ u ---C: -·--I -N --. .. .. --.. 7 34 l Peat -----< . ------------ 20-'-,_ BOTTOM OF BORING @ 19.5' . . . . -L . . ~roJ. No. 90029A I Woodward-Clyde Consultants Appendix A-2 HC004702 ,. pr O j e ct: PORT QUENDALL Log of Boring No. Renton, \Jashing_ton 4 Qate Drilled May 18, 1983 Remarks 4" Ho I low Ster., Au;er T'(Pf! of Boring Hammer Wei9h1 ::: • ::: • >-• ;,... ; f ;; " - .i " MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0 ..J - E • ~< ~ Q. ., ... ~ ~ .. a 0 • 0 .. C 3: ~ • '" • :i:: ". " !:: C Surtace E lt'\·11,on ~ ~-I 1 26 < FILL )o o --. -- Si 1 t with aggregate o.! <i_' -- -)Oo C ' -A . . 0¢;; . . -. --- : Co C , -_;,_t::,_ . lense~) .-:-C ( , l s-SANDY SILT (ML) -. . . ' 2 . " ---Oark brC)l,Jn, occ:as ion~J _peat ---.. --' -/ , -~ - ~,</ - }Log --~ ----<. --, '' --t Fl LL '~ ",) -. '' \ r--. ,._ __ ,. --., -. -~ ··-= - 3 2 0.056 CLAYEY SILT ~-~ --10-Black, med • • )+P·l'astic, · -c=-. noti~eable H~~ o~ and iridescent ' --"" , ' -"' 4 18 0.44 ~ome peal \ --' . \ ·' ...__ 0 ' ---v~ en -.-,=..=.. :, ----"-' -' --" 5 4 3.4 ,___ ----·-.. -" _ ~nt throughout --0 ' ' ...__ - 15-n~ -C < " -.= a, \ --\ -, . = . ' . --'· ' -Y.v (CH) -...__ . ' -- 6 Brown, with occas iona I peat lenses --7 0. 75 ' -' --' -20-\ ·. '-I -• I -. --,_ 7 2 0.041 / BOTTOM OF BORING @ 23' -.... ,_ I' Proj. No. 90029A I Woodward-Clyde Consultants Appendix . A-4 --· ----·--~ !"" project: PORT QUENDALL Renton, ~ashin;ton Log of Boring Nci. 5 ~ate Drilled Mal 20 1 1983 ~emarks 611 Hoilow Sterr. Auger e of Boring T;P Hamme' Weight : C -~ >-. ; : ;: ~ t.:: a ;;--:r • -MATERIAL. OESCRI PTION C ~ E • < 'E ~ ..J ~ < .. 0 Q,. II: -!2 ... -'ii ~ u ;: ., ii C 0 • 0 E " u ~ Su,.fac:t Elt\•a1,or,· ..J 1 10 o. 73 FILL .. --Si I ty Sand (S/1)' brown, dry, -- some organic debris/rootlets -.:..-( ,.. . 2 10 I. 0 /l . --. ---0 3 16 0.90 ~ -(,.~~ . --"' " .t: ,_ u 5-"l"Becomes damp, pitc~'agments and'llla<:k -= "' 4 20 0.89 ~·at er fibres, with notice l~ HC odor " ~ - _..5L •. -~ .,, -C I SILTY CLAY (CH-CL) . / ~ /; == "' ' 5 24 0.89 - 01 ive-gray 1 mediui,Jo ~~-"plasticity, ..c -~= <.> occasional black fi~s &:brick fragments ,-= > ' "· ---"' -6 3li 0.006 '-· ; .. .. C . ,/--.-._ .. ---:-.-.· - SIL TY SANO (Slj)\--.::'-...._ .. .t: 10--u Gray, med i um~CC)<l'.:,Jle....AI i st inct ive C -HC odor and i · e'Scent sheen --' <, . .,,. . .. --"\ \ > .. -/ ,,.--. ' .. / (_ ) /.--.. , -- --. (_ .....;,.~? ---- 7 29 0.006 " < --"') --- ( - :/ _ ... IS-- . . ( / :;t'°"""•' ooo,=;o,i;oo --.,, -.. ., -., I --.·.·., ... - ~~· ... - ~ ·· ticeable HC odor and iridescent 0 -. -- heen; some rapid corporation --·-· "' -.. <.> - -of lig~ter fractions noted . .--t" -.. -... "'-- :::::,-_ ~ -a 28 1.9 Cl --. \..-Concentrated contamination . • -----.. 20-.s= -" -.-... C - CLAYEY SILT to .SANDY SILT (11H·l1L) ----I --Brown, some odor .,,. --· -_:_...:...; --.. -9 12 0.71 - ......-eoTT0/1 OF BORING@ 23' . ..,.----- Pro· J. No. 90029A l Woodward-Clyde Consultants Appendix A-5 TI project: PORT QUENOALL Log of Boring Renton, Washington No. 8 ..-May 19, 1983 Remarks o.aie Drilled !ype of Soring 6" Hol lm·J Stem Auce r r1arnmer Weight • ~ >-.: M ;: • :~-"' .-1 = .. .... MATERIAL OESCRI PTION 0 M <'c~ .., < " E • ~ . -.., ... ~ 0 0 " 0 ... "' iii < 3: ... • B :r " >-::, Surfacl! El!'liilt1on --1 36 o.86 FILL . ---(ML) , Sandy Si 1 t dark brown, damp ------2 53 0.054 --/"} ---(SM) /' \._ 3. 0.013 SILTY SANO ;'-. ·. -01 ive--gray 1 medium graine~,/ 1c:tt'!.: im:~e . HC odor and iridescent she~eti ~ '~ . . .,, .. C: s-"' 4 19 0.94 ·,_ - CLAY (CH) : Light gray 1 J7ighly plastic .c -u -SAND (SW): Black, HC ddof a.9d.sheen ... :,, <I. ' ' ...;._ -5 44 1.2 CLAY ( CH) : Light 9 ril~ "'-... // Q CLAY (CH): Br:>wn "-. ' --.... , .. ~ 6 30 l. 1 "'""'."."". .r. ... , _; u SIL TY SANO ( Stt},._ ' C: -SL . - Gray, 30; s~~4table HC odor and . :: ' Water ... ~ 10-abundant br "\ ) d_,ari'1 iridescent -_-... -· ·--sheen ,, / ~. -~-~-. \'( - /~ \? _......: -" ... ~ s4 t"-SJy.~11: t). > --. -.=.=. / ·= 7 12 1.8 L-"9..ht ~n,"l,ighly plastic, some ---orgil'I\Jc ~bris (wood) --"' - ~ " - ~'""'": ~ 15--~ - -:-~-0 -< · nish 9ray1 3'.J% sand --"' --~/ -... ·.· -u .. .. :,, ---· "--. ., ; . .. ----¥v ...=.=. Q -. -CLAY (CH-CL) --- 8 19 1. 3 Dark brown, occasional sand lense5 ,___ .<: ---u -. C: ---·--'---' --~ -- 20 "'7,. 'C, .. ,c i~ a • ~--1~ ·= TBecomes gray , .... - 22 • ·· .. ·:· .... ----. = ~ 2~ -9 27 0.0~2 ~ BOTTO/I OF BORING € 24.5' Pro· J. Ho. 90029A I Woodward,Clyde Consultants Appendi.x A-9 ' r:-. project: PORT QUENOALL log of Boring No. 9 Renton, 1/ashington oate Drilled. M.ay 16, 1983 Remarks Type of Boring· 411 Hollow Stem Auger Hammer Weight: ' > • 2 ;;: • ;;: = r.:, .., .. ;:-: . -MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0 -' - $ E • <iii/I -' -' "' .. 0 .. . -0 w .. 0 • 3 "' ! "' iii ' ::c 0 C • !:: Surfact E1~vuion: -' • ' FILL OCo l 0.005 ', Si 1 t, with some gravels . ' --7~ . --c . 1. 7 TAR: Black, distinctive HC odo;.Q ... .4,. --. ' 2 - with occasional cement fragme s -·-' . .· ,,. ._;;..: --/ .. ' .. 3 2.2 J--. SAND: Black stain with odo('.";"' ~ -? ' ' ---Wood . "-,,' ' ' ' 5-/h> "-./ ,-, , ' -.. .--//(/,/; -. .. •. ·-. ' , \ 4 10 1. 3 '-- CLAYEY SILT (HH) ,· (~ --',' --, I' -· 01 ive-9ray 1 damp, soft~·tnc:tive 5 4 0.014 --"' , , odor / ... .____ --"' --' -. \~----I ,, .:: 6 9 1.0 --0 \ / , 10-:J. Brown peat\(/...._ ::::::=--"' :, ,-==--::: ---C. .... --/;-', '} --" . ,, ~ ---. / //) )__ • ..._ V C: ·.' --0 ' ~ l .... _ . .t -·-, ' --C , -\ ' . ~ -· ' \ ·.·. . 7 25 0.03 . S ...._{SIi) . -~.·-::'.· '· ' -V 9/fi ne, poorly sorted, .. .,· N ... ", .. , .... "' .. sheen ..::.. ..;... 15-< -, n }oder in sand ,,,· ,--.. -.,~ .. ' ' .. ~ ·.·· ' -;.. .....;.·;.: '' ' : .. ~ .. :· :. \ -. ,• .. ----,, 'CLAYEY SI-LT (IIH) --. -8 28 ( 0 I i ve·gray, slight odor -,, • --- . "·' -- 20- '-BOTTOM ,_ OF BORING @ 19.5 . - . - -. Pro· J. No; 90029A I Woodward•Clycfe Consultants Appendi~ A·ll .. ,..,...... ' t proJec : PORT QUENOALL Log of Boring No. Renton, W'ash i ngton 12 oau Drilled May 17, 1983 Rernarks fype of Boring 1<" Hal low Stem Auaer ~,mmer Wei9h~. • ~ >-;;: .!! ;;: ;; "' ;.-:I. :. -MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0 ~ ,; A " . .. ~ -< E • " . -0 ... ~ "& V 2 " ;: E .. 0) ' :,: ! R !: ~ S1.1rfact e1ev11•on. ~ FI LL: Si It, dark brown ----. --r FILL: Si 1 t, with organics ,.::-.;. . 1,--:-...:::. . 1 29 O.OM " . --~=--~ - . /(, .. .-... " . -.... :-~· "' SILTY SANO (SM) ~ . '' •. .<; 2 20 < Gray 1 medium to ·fine, oc~ Vn~ ~ ---. . ): gravel Jense5, and organic . ' I " ' . ' / -.I ... t s-3 53 0.001 /') .._. •. I . .,, ..5L ~.;.__ C: (0'; .. 'w'ater . ... -. -.-.D • •O 0.003 .., .. ~e· i,,t > . o,:•_,o c.. ", o·Ct ~. -0 . /~~) ------.<; -... C \~,0-/ ·--·---7 ' 10-4' \,~ .. \J. -. /:::\ \. ;_-:..z.} I ·,·,; . (< );:~ ----' --.--"O --C: SA ~'51}.'I' / EY SILT (ML·MH) --.. - 5 19 -0.001 --"' -Br~,.soft, abundant -.-. --. ' .J::. --organ, ris --~ -,.,..--·-/ ~-- IS---=--): ---< ---) 1--~ .,, -.:..:..-" . -~ --., ~ -~ ~-0 '/ ~ --.... -.--. --.. wt "' -._, -V > --... -SILTY SAND (SM) ':-""·~·--6 ~ 0.00) ·i: ·, 40% s i It, abundant organic -Q --Gray, '.· . ---· -deb~is . '' .· . - 20-,_ ·>·.: :; . ..c: -u --.·.· " -~.:....-_: --... '.·l:i:: ' -4' - iJ SILTY CLAY (CH·CL) \... \ -. ··,: : Brown, darop, medium to highly plastic . ····· . - 2 23' -=-=--7 < ~ BOTTOM OF BORING ~ --- Proj. Ho. 90029A I Woodward-Clyde Consultants Appendix A-14 project: PORT QUENDALL Log of Boring No. 14 Renton~ Washington --;l' o,d1ed May 1 a. 1983 Remarks ~· ' •" Ho 110"" Stern Auoe r of sor 1ng h'Pe mer Weight "•"' C ..... .2 >-;;: -.: • <;; • ;;--% • -DESCRIPTION 0 -' " c C ., MATERIAL I, ' .. -fragments and wood ~ I.,'• .•o7, 1--,,, ... . . Do C It -E~ '· 2 43 0.007 . -· . TPitch '" "·-fragments --.. 0 D • ,_ --. s-26 0.007 \Jat:er-/ , ··~ ' . 3 SL ---- C l ~t ., / . / / /·, 4 28 ·-< SILTY SANO (SM) ( ~, / ---. - Dark gray, medium,~ a<t"ed, .. .--occasional thin grave ,,ir\l-~beds . ----"' 5 20 0.009 ~) -. tr, --. . .. TGrades ' -, t ~~~~ 0 ; ' -...,. ~-.";., "' ,- lO-,_ .. . I ,-.....,, -..,_. ::, --' < C. ,• . . .. --., -6). -, · . C L. . -· 0 . ., ,-~~ " C .. .. . . ·.:.• :~-... \ ~-.;,.~·.:· . ~·- 6 7 < ~fine sand . ~ :. : f,. :. ', . . ~-· ,. is~ v=-,_ :<,_·: ~ .... < / ··- ', . ~•-~arse . . -. --" . ' ' -. .. L. \ " --' . I, ' -. ' ~ ' . 7 2~ < PEAT ---r: • ---. --I I, With cl av. brown. hichh olastic ------ 20- ~BOTTOM OF ,_ BORING€ 19.5• -. . - . . Pro· J. No. 90029A I Woodward,Clyde Consultants Appendix A•16 project: · PORT QUENOALL Log of Boring No. 15 Renton, Washington ~ Ortlled. May 17, 1983 Remarks oau 4" Hollow Ste-Aucie r Type of Soring· Hammer Weight ~ < .: • .:: • ,_ ~ ;; " --' " ::--:t ~ -MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0 .... - ~ E • <{ C >' .... " .. • ~ .. -52 .. I-a u 3: ,!l ., iii ' "' • .:: 0 u Surfac, Eievaiion :; FILL: Si 1 t, dack bcown -- 1 58 0.004 -----~~ SANO (SIi) .. -Medium to fine, occasional grav.e-1 -- and clay lenses, slight HC odc{r 1 .. ,:; -/(._ -.. "' ' t. ·, .. 2 32 0.008 / r ....... _ . . •.· ---V ' ~, C SANDY SILT (ML) ' ' ·• ~ 0 '-... ---s-Greeni.sh gray, some cla.y (co-20t) l ----C 3 22 0.002 V -" occasional organics/pi~i fragments ---..Q --~ _.; ---.c (< /) ----· --4 44 < --J: -. ·,/ / --SAND (SP-SM) ,., . ( -"" . SILTY u -"" 30% s i l t, med·i um to c.o~T;,$;~~1"1d, ,. -C -43 . Cl. -"' 5 < -some HC od~i:, .... _t t, roughout ·,,,/ .,, -..Q .. C --< --. .. -'-' ~~ ~c.....,,, "' -:,, -... .,, 10-\\ // .. ,' ----Q V, 3 -\ / .. --. ' . - \ \ .,, -.,, r··. " -u ·v·· ... --C -.,r,-., . .. --·-,: . ~ .. 0 -' ~·· / i ;.--.....,~ --N ( ''/ _.,-.-.. .... "' --. -·-., ,· . .... '-' _:._·;..:' :,, -6 19 0.002 PEAT~·k·.c,.lay, ---... --br-own, highly plastic ~ ------------Q - 15-,, -"' -: --< -·. - /' SI ty\SANO (SP-SM) -·--. . .. .c -:· .. ::: .. u -. S i !ht odor C - .. ,::.·-:.-·-- ~ ' -.. .'-~·\<: N --\ .. ·.· ·= ·:· --.-: .. . . . -.-~ . .--7 ~ 0.001 -• -··, .. · -:·.-_:_-.\ - 2D- "--BOTIOM - OF BORING f 19,5' -- -- --- Pro· No. I Appendix -J, 90029A Woodward,Clyde Consultants A· 17 1 ,. DRILLING LOG LOCATION N196831 DRILLING AGeNCY HOLeNO. NAME OF DRILLE!l TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE ELEV. T. 0. C: 29.16 GRND ELEV: 2J.l CEMENT PROJECT OUENDALL -. TOTAL NUMBER SAMPLES 15 SOIL SAMPLING SERVICE DEPTii TO WATER BELOW GRD SURF ACE BH-175 Terry Asberry 50' SAMP % NO. REC 000 40 015 10 40 60 80 90 DATE HOLE STARTED COMPLETED DRILLING MEil-lOD HOU.OW STEM AUGER INSPECTOR WARREN PERKINS CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS (DESCRIPTION) 4" . loose, topsoil, gray-brown, sand. gravelly SILT. (ML) 4' Medium dense, damp. brown , medium SAND, (10% silQ. (SW) ... wet and gravelly SAND ... REMARKS -Bouncing on s1ones ... FILL .sz. 12121 .sz. a.1 fton12/22 090 80 11· Loose, saturated, gray, silty SAND (30-40% silQ. (SM) 14.8~--------l Very stiff, Salurated, gray SILT. (ML) Woodward-Clyde Consultants e • 11 • • • • • • • DRILLING LOG (Cont. Sheet) HOLE NO. BH-178 D S (FT) T SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS AM % CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS REMARKS NO. REC. {DESCRIPTION) 21 185 90 20 2:35 70 10 Very stiff, saturated, gray SILT wtth trace fine sand ( 10%). (ML) 26' Gray, dense, saturated GRAVEL wtth trace sand. (GW) Woodward-Clyde Consultants •• • • .. I DRILLING LOG (Cont. Sheet) HOLE NO • BH-17B SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS D S Bl AM % CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS REMARKS (FT) T NO. REC. (DESCRIPTION) 10 15 5 Very dense. saturated, gray sandy GRAVELS. (GW) Woodward-Clyde Consultants e • .. 1--D::..:.:R...:IL;.:Ll::.:Nc.:.G::..:L:.:O;.::G:_,_:(C::..o;.:n;.:t.::..S::.:h.;..e:...:e:.:,t)'----'""-HO-L-E _NO_.__:.B:;::H.:..· 1:.:.7.:;:B _____ _,..=-------1 SHEET 4 OF " SHEETS % CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS NO. REC. (DESCRIPTION) 485 10 Very dense, sawrated, gray sandy GRAVELS. (GW) TOTAL DEPTH= 50 FT REMARKS Woodward-Clyde Consultants e •• DRILLING LOG PROJECT QUENDALL PRU/ ECT NUMBER LOCATION N197707 TOTAL NUMBER SAMPLES 14 DRILLING AGENCY SOIL SAMPLING SERVICE DEPTI-110 WA TEA BELOW GAD SURF ACE BH-188 NAME OF DAUER Terry Asberry ORIWNG METHOD HOLLOW STEM AUGER TOTAL OEP'TH OF HOt.E S4' INSPECTOR WARREN PERKINS 4 5 1 1 5 SAMP % CLASSIFICATION QF MATERIALS NO. REC (DESCRIPTION) 000 30 040 0 060 20 075 30 090 50 Firm, damp, gray SILT wi!h gravels. (ML) LOOSE RUBBLE NO SAMPLES 6.0' Very soft, saturated, brown SILT wi!h oi sheen and some organics. (ML) 2 125 50 REMARKS FILL ..:sz Nap!halene odor OVA> 100 ppm at sample OVA 2-3 ppm at borahole Woodward-Clyde Consultants e I , DRILLING LOG (Cont. Sheet) HOLE NO. BH·18B SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS I DP s Bl AM % CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS REMARKS (Fil T NO. REC. (DESCRIPTION) I I oder off samples BENTO-• NITT: SLURRY 8 175 40 18.S I Loose to dense, saturated, gray. flfle to medium s,lty SAND (20-40% sih). (SM) I I I 6 225 70 OVA < 1 ppm Breathing I Zone (B.Z.) I I • 16 275 I 50 .. -mediurn dense ... • I • • Woodward-Clyde Consultants e I , I IJ • • • • • ~ DRILLING LOG (Cont. Sheet) HOLE NO. BH-188 SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS DP S Bl (FT) T M % CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS REMARKS NO. REC. (DESCRIPTION) 38 325 75 Dense. saturated, gray fine SAND and silt with trace gravel (20 • 40% silt). (SM) 40 24 425 40 ... Trace well-rounded gravel ... 25 Very dense. saturated gray, sandy GRAVEL. (GW) Woodward-Clyde Consultants e DRILLING LOG (Cont. Sheet) DP S (FT) T !S7 HOLE NO. BH-186 SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS 'l'o CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS REC. (DESCRIPTION) 0 Very dense, saturated, gray , sandy GRAVEL (GW) A few gravel bits in spoon TOTAL DEPTI-i = 54 Fr REMARKS Woodward-Clyde Consultants e • DRILLING LOG .· . . . . 2"PVC . . I PROJECT SHEET 1 OUENDALL PRQ.J ECT NUMBER 86004S OF 2 SHE S N19 639 E166212 TOTAL NUMBER SAMPLES 8 SOIL SAMPLING SERVICE DEPTH TO WATER BELOW GAD SURFACE BH-19 Teny Asberry 19 ft SAMP % NO. REC 000 75 100 030 75 050 75 065 75 100 18 130 100 DATE HOLE STARTED 12/1 18 COMPLETED 12119188 DRILLING METiiOD HOLLOW STEM AUGER INSPECTOR KELLY SUSEWIND CU,.SSIFICATJON OF MATERIALS (DESCRIPTION) Medium dense, moist, brown, gravelly, silty SANO. (SM) 2.0' Medium stiff, moist, gray SILT with some sand and trace of gravel. ( ML) 6.0' Loose, saturated, gray, medium to coarse SAND. (SP) REMARKS FILL VOA = 0-3 ppm in breathing zone (B.Z.) OVA 0.5 ppm in B.Z. 500 ppm in auger Flll Coal like inclusions in silt .8 ppm on sample 0.5. ppm in B.Z. 1 oo ppm@ sampl > 1000 ppm in auger Woodward-Clyde Consultants ~ , DRILLING LOG (Cont. Sheet) HOLE NO. BH-19 DPT S (FT) T 6 20 27 a 29 3 31 SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS AM % CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS REMARKS NO. REC. (DESCRIPTION) Loose, saturated, gray, medium to coarse SAND. ( SP) 4.5 ppm in B.Z. Drager shows o ~~~~~~~~...;Benzene 10 175 100 18' Stiff, wet. tan to brown SILT w~h organics. (Ml) TOTAL DEPTii; 19 FT Woodward-Clyde Consultants ~ • • .. • DRILLING LOG LOCATION DAtlllNG AGENCY HOLE NO. NAME OF DRILLER TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE ELEV. T.O. C.22.88 PROJECT OUENDALL N197389 PROJ ECT NUMBER ~ TOTAL NUMBER SAMPLES 14 SOIL SAMPLING SERVICE DEPTH TO WATER BELOW GAD SURFACE BH-208 DATE HOLE STARTED 12/19/88 COMPLETED Terry Asberry DRILLING METHOD HOLLOW STEM AUGER 54' INSPECTOR KELLY SUSEWINO SAM % CLASSIFICATION OF MATERlALS NO. REC (DESCRIPTION) Very loose, tan brown, fine sand 4 ooo 1 oo wfth trace of some silt and trace organics as wood, dry. (SP/SM) 5 015 100 36 030 100 12 050 70 8 065 60 6 080 100 5 125 100 .o· -----------, Very stiff gray/black, sandy SILT. (ML) Greervgray,wet, loose medium SAND. (SW) 5.5' ----------l Loose, wet, green, gray medium SAND. (SW) 9.0' Medium stttf. wet, brown SILT with trace sand (ML) 13.5'---------1 Very loose, wet, gray, medium SAND with silt and trace organics. (SW) REMARKS FILL .:sz. 12/20 0.5 ppm in Breathing Zone (8.2.) 1.5 ppm in auger Woodward-Clyde Consultants e DRILLING LOG (Cont. Sheet) HOLE NO. BH-20B BENTO- NITE SLURRY DP S {FT) T SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS M % CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS REMARKS 7 NO. REC. {DESCRIPTION) 175 100 Loose, wet, gray, medi:Jm SAND with peaty sift layeis. ( SM) .•. stiff, peaty SILT... 7 225 100 ... stiff, silty CLAY ... 10 275 100 3 ppm in auger 8.G. in 8.Z. Woodward-Clyde Consulumts I I I • • • • • .J • • II • • • • • • DRILLING LOG (Cont. Sheet) HOLE NO. BH-208 SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS AM % Cu\SSIFICATION OF MATERIALS REMARKS NO. REC. (DESCRIPTION) 40 30 Medi.Im dense, wet. gray, medium to fine SAND with silt (SM) 35' ----------1 Medium dense.gray, wet.gravelly sub-rounded , fine to medium SAND. (SW} ... Increasing gravel size ... Woodward-Clyde Consultants @ I , I II I I • I I I I • II I II • • • I DRILLING LOG {Cont. Sheet) HOLE NO. BH-208 CAVE- IN DP S (FT) T 56 59 SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS AM % CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS REMARKS NO. REC. (DESCRIPTION) 62 525 0 Medum dense to very dense, sa1urated, gray, gravally, fine to medium SAND. (SW) TOTAL DEPTH ; 54 FT Wood_ward-Clyde Consultants e DRILLING LOG LOCATION DRILLING AGENCY PROJECT OUENOALL N197050. SOIL SAMPLING SERVICE BH-218 Terry Asbeny PROJ ECT NUMBER 8 TOTAL NUMBER SAMPLES SHEET 1 .. 16 DEPTI-1 TO WATER BELOW GRD SURFACE DATE HOLE STARTED 12/23188 COMPLETED DRILLING METHOD HOLLOW STEM AUGER TOT AL DEPTI-1 OF HOLE 54.5 ft INSPECTOR WARREN PERKINS . NITE :- PELLETS/•: HOLE :• PLUG -...i--. 8/ SAM % CLASSIFICATION OFMATERIALS REMARKS NO. REC (DESCRIPTION) 59 000 60 55 015 60 Loose-dense, wet. brown SILT and gravel with wood chips 2.S FILL 45 030 80 Very stiff, wet gray-white, silty CLAY Fill, Decomposed gypsum? 50 045 70 36 060 40 075 0 090 40 FILL 9.0' Very dense. saturated, gray, medium to fine SAND (10-20% silt) sz 130 5 sand and silt, gradational contact from creosote odor and sand above to silt below sheen Woodward-Clyde Consultants e • ,. ~D:..:R-=1-=L-=Ll=-N:..:G:..:L=-O=-G.::....:.(C::.o=.n:.:;t::... ::.Sh::.e:.:e::.tl!..--,-Jl.-H-O-LE_N_ 0 _· _B_H_-2_1 B-----r::~~,-------i SHEET 2 • D S (FT) T OF 4 SHEETS AM % CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS NO. REC. (DESCRIPTION) 12 180 5 Sliff, saturated, gray-brown sandy · SILT. 16 2:30 80 24' Very stiff, saturated, gray-brown, peaty SILT. 26' 28 280 70 very stiff, saturated, gray sandy SILT to silty SAND (20-30% silt). REMARKS W~odward-Clyde Consultants e DRILLING !-CG (Cont. Sheet) HOLE NO. BH-216 AQUAS SAND 0 SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS % CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS REMARKS REC. (DESCRIPTION) 1 60 trace of gravelly silt in sand trap silty gravel sluff at top Very S1iff, saturated, gray sandy SILT of sample Medium dense, saturated gray to 44 430 70 yellow-brown, silty SAND. 8 480 40 Woodward-Clyde Consultants e l ' I • • I • • I • • • I • • I • • • DRILLING LOG (Cont. Sheet) HOLE NO. BH-218 BENTO- NIT!: PEUETS DP S Bi (FT) T SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS AM % CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS REMARKS NO. REC. (DESCRIPTION) Medium dense. saturated, gray to yellow-brown silty SAND . 17 530 45 54' sa GRAVEL TOTAL DEPTI-1 E 54.5 FT 60 Woodward-Clyde Consultants e DRILLING LOG 'Ill.ING AGENCY NO. IIAME OF DAIUER AL DEPTH OF HOLE LEV. T. O.C. 28.09' I;. 26.6' ICRET • ~0- SUJRRY I • I • I PROJECT OUENDALL N197560 . PROJ ECT NUMBER 86004S TOT AL NUMBER SAMPLES SHEET1 OF 2 SHE::TS 11 SOIL SAMPLING SERVICE DEf'TH TO WATER BELOW GRD SURFACE BH-22 Teny Asbeny 28.5' SAMP % NO. REC 000 100 015 100 030 100 4 045 100 LE STARTED COMPI.ETED DATE HO 12/06188 DAU.ING METHOD HOLLOW STEM AUGER INSPECTOR KELLY SUSEWIND CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS (DESCRIPTION) Soft, brown, moist SILTwith trace sand and organics as roots 1.5' an/brown medium interbedded SAND and SILT. 6.0' ~~~~~~~~----, REMARKS OVA at Background in Breathing Zone (BL) and at borehole enerally interbedded ray silt and red sand OVA at Back Ground in Breathing Zone (B.Z.) and in borehole Very soft , saturated, gray, Sil Twtth 060 100 trace sand and organics. ..• 6" gray, medium sand lense ... 1 075 100· 095 100 ..• Medium stiff ... 8 130 1 oo ... 6" organic (wood chips) layer ... OVA=Oppmin auger • OVA= 0 ppm in auger. Woodward-Clyde Consultants I ,---------------)-,.-H-O-L~E-N-O-.--S-H---22----------------, • DRILLING LOG (Cont. Sheet • l---------'------:.....J.-------------.-,S""H"'E"'E'="T""'2,-------l I D s (Fl) T • I • I • SCREEN • ' I I I CAVE IN I I 31 OF 2 SHEETS AM % ClASSIFICAllON OF MATERIALS NO. REC. (DESCRIPTION) 16.0' Me<fOJm dense., wet, gray medium SAND with trace silt. SmaU silt strtngers at + r at 19 ft. 11 180 100 ... 1 foot medium stiff, wet. gray 14 230 100 dayey SILT to silt w~h some ciay lense (washed material is clayey silt 25-30) 70 TOTAL DEPTH• 29.5 FT REMARKS OVA= 0 ppm in B.Z. OVA=Oppmin B.Z. OVA= 0 ppm in 82. • 32 ,..__ __ _.__ ............ __.__,i.___.__ _____ ....__ __ ----1 Woodward-Clyde Consultants ~ I • ~ DRILLING LOG LOCATION DRILLING AGENCY • HOI.ENO. NAME OF DRILLER • TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE I El.EV. T. O. C. 24.51' -~Zl.O' I I CEMENT • .. HOLE PLUG .· . . . I PROJECT QUENDALL PROJECT NUMBER N197551 · _,' TOT AL NUMBER SAMPLES 9 SOIL SAMPLING SERVICE DE?TH TO WATER BELOW GAD SURFACE BH-23 DATE HOlE STARTED COMPLETED 12i28/tl8 T eny Asberry ORILUNG METHOD HOLLOW STEM AUGER 24.S INSPECTOR WARREN PERKINS SAMP % CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS NO. REC (DESCRIPTION) 6" ·loose.silt and WOOd ch" 000 70 rock, gravel FILL 015 75 030 60 050 5 065 5 080 70 Stiff lo very stiff, gray SIL Twith gravel 4.0' -----------1 Very stiff. blad< to gray banded silt to siltstone wood debris FILL 8.0' ----------! Medium dense. saturaled, silty SAND witt, gravel 5 130 80 Firm. saturated, brown SILT REMARKS FILL wood debris and slough (no sample) strong odor, Qil sheen OVA => 1000 ppm at borehole oil sheen Woodward-Clyde Consultants e • I I I I I I • • • • • II • • • • • • DRILLING LOG (Cont. Sheet) HOLE NO. BH-23 SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS DP S 8/ AM % CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS REMARKS (FT) T 24 5 26 27 28 29 30 1 32 NO. REC. (DESCRIPTION) 10 180 100 7 230 100 Stiff, saturated, brown Sil T with WOOcf debris. S.and at tip of spoon Sard Lense? Rnn, saturated gray SILT oa sheen Oil sheen 23.S--,..----------l Brown silty peat Oil sheen 24' Stiff, saturated. ra SILT Oil Sheen much less TOTAL DEPTH ~ 24.5 FT Woodward-Clyde Consultants I DRILLING LOG PROJECT: PROJECT NO. SHEET • OUENDALL 86004S 1 of 2 LOCATION: N 197,848 TOTAL NO. SAMPLES: a E 1 662.383 DRIUJNG AGENCY: SOL SAMPLING SERVICE OEl'Tli TO WATER ea.ow GAD SURFACE: 3.SFT • HOLE NO. BH-24 CATE STARTED: 7/31/90 DATE COMPLETED: 7r.lfl90 IJ NAME OF DRILi.ER: WAYNE GUY DRIWNG METHOD: HOU.OW STEM AUGER lOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE: INSPECTOR: 29FT DAVEWAU<ER • DPT s $AMP 'IC, Cl.ASSJACATION OF MATI:RIALS REMARKS (Fl1 T 6'FT NO. REC. (DESCRIPTION) ' ' • ' ' Brown sihy gravely sand (SM). OVA= 17ppm ' ' ,~ 1 , ' , ' • , , ' Enw<>plug ' , OVA• 120 ppm Benl0ni1e ,' ' Chips , ' • 3 53 100 \J 3.5' -• Fibrous o~anics • 0 (probably wooclwaste) ---OVA= 1000+ppm • ---7 25 • • 0 25 OVA= 120 ppm • • Cdo<ado 10-ro • Wellpack NA 3 0 OVA• 300 ppm @Borehole • = 0.5 in B.Z. • 4 25 • lntermiXad organic silt (OL) and peat (Pn ooft, saturated. Woodward-Clyde Consultants•f# I HOLE NO. SHEE7 , DRILLING LOG (CON'T} BH-24 2 of 2 DPT s SAMP ... CLASS IF I CA TlON OF MATERIALS REMARKS I (FT) ,. fl/FT NO. REC. (DESCRIPTION) Intermixed o,ganlc sil (OL) and peat (Pl) soft. saturated I OVA> 1000ppm (In peat) • 17 l!/llwn organic Sil (OL) trace wood flbars @ 17 .o•. I ti 5 100 19 • Dark brown peat (PT) with fibers@ 19.5'. OVA~ 150ppm ......... 20 , , , , • ..., ... , .. , .. , ' ..... ' ., , , , ........ ' , , , , ' ....... 21 Ban""1 ... , , , , • Chips ~~~'~":' , , '' , , , , .......... ,,,, 22 .. ' ..... Brown organic silt (OL) @ 22.0' , , , , ' ' .. ' , , , , becomes gray dayey Sitt (ML) @ 22.5' . ' .. ' .... , , , , .......... , , , , ........ 19 100 , , , , :ti ',';''·,', Gray fine sand (SP) medium dense, ' ....... , , , , saturated with trace sil wlh seam of ... ' .... • , , , , ' ..... ' organic silt @ 23.o·. , , , , .... ' .. 24 ,,,, ......... , , , .,. .. ' ...... , , , , .. ' .... • , , , , ... ..... ' , ,., , 2$ ........ , , , , .......... , , , , .. ' .. ' , , , , .. ' .... , , , , • ... ' .. ' , , , , 28 ......... , , , , "' ...... ' , , , , ' ....... , , , , .. ' ..... , , , , • ....... ' rT , , , , ... ' .. ' Gray fine sand {SP) and silty sand (SM) , , , , ... ' .... so , , , , 3 with Sitt layers . .. .. ... ... , , , , ........... , , , , 28 • ......... ,,,,.._,,, , , , , .......... ., , , , ' ........ I I I I ... ' ' ' 2!I • • • • Woodward-Oyde Consultani:-e I -• • • • DRILLING LOG I PROJECT: OUENOALL LOCATION'. N197,109 E 1 662265 DRILLING AGENCY: SOIL SAMPLING SERVICE HOLE NO. BH-258 NAME OF ORILl..ER: WAYNE GUY TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE: 47.5 FT T.O.Cfil DPT s l!IFT SAM!' ... (FT) T NO. REC. ..-, ' :, ,-.:, -r,.,, t,.~, ,.. ... i,r..·, ,..~, ":' '-1-,...,, ~~' ,' ", ... - E,wi'oplug ,..,.... ...~ ... ,.. .. h.' .. ---r-o;, "'~' ~z-....... ,..., IX Chips ,.. t,.', -15 50 -' ,', ' ,..,, ,,, ,..,, ~3-'-',' ,,, ,..,, ,,, ,', -,,, ~;~ ,,, ' ,,, "' , ,,, ,,, -,,, ' ,,, ,,, ' '-5-28 100 ,,, ~,: ,,, ",' ', -,,, ,,, ' ,,, '' H"".""~ ,,, ,', ,...,~, ,', X :;~ -,,, 17 75 ,,, , '' ' >-7-,', ' .. ~ ... , ,,, ..... ~ --,,, ', ,' i,!, -,,, ,,, ~~: ,,, -,,, ' ' ,,, H-24 100 ",' ', ,,, ... ~, -,,, " ' , ,,, " ,, ,,, ro.;, 1-10-:...-,,, ,,, ,·' -,,, ,', ,,, ,,, ,,, "';' -11- " '' ' ,', " -, ~~ ,,, ,, 1-1.z--~~~ ,,, ~--,,, "'' -,,, •'' , ' ,, ' i-13-12 100 , ,,, '' , ,' ", ~ -' , ' ,..,, ,, ,', -14-L..-, ro-', -~ ,, -, ,,, ' ' ,:~ -~ L-15- PROJECT NO. I SHEET 66004S 1 of 3 TOTAL NO. SA1JPL£S: 12 OEPlH TO WATER BELOW GRO SURFACE: SFT DATE STARTED: 81219-0 l DATE COMPLETED: 8/3190 ORIWNG MElHOO: HOLLOW STEM AUGER INSPECTOR: OAVEWAU<ER Cu\SSIFICATlON OF MATERIALS REMARKS (DESCRIPTION) l SIity sand. gravel with wood chps - - - OVA= 130 ppm -70'Yo wood chips u: j - - - - Gray silty sand (SM) with seams of clean OVA= 40ppm - fine sand and sandy silt, trace organics. ~ - - -Gray fine sand (SP), medium dense, wet OVA= 10ppm - - OVA= 10 ppm -@sampler in sill sample - Gray silt layer, soft, saturated, -trace organics 6.5'·9.5'. Gray fine sand@ 9.5', saturated. - OVA=60ppm '- - -- - - Gray silly sand, saturated, with seams - of sandy silt (·40'Yo of sample). OVA= 30 ppm - -Fine sand (SP), dense, below 14.0'. - I- -.... - Woodward-Clyde Consultants e ,. DRILLING LOG (CON'T) Ben1<>nl1B Pel1815 ,4;• Stainless Slee! ,010- Slot!Bd -- COiorado 10-20 Sand , ', ' , ' , ', ' , ' , ', ' , ~~ ' , ' , ' ,, , ' , ', ' , ' ,, , ' ,, , ' ,, , ' , ' , ' , . . . -·. . . . . . . . . OPT s (FT) T , ' , ' , -' , ' ,: 1e ' , ', ' , ' , 17 ' ,, ~: ' , ,, 11 ,, , ' , ', ' •• ~; , ' , ' ' , 20 ,, , ' , ' , 21 . . . . . . . . . . 22 . . . . . . . fl/FT 4 11 ,, SAMP "' NO. REC. 100 100 100 HOLE NO. BH-25B CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS (DESCRIPTION) Gray fine sand (SP) Brown sill (ML), soft, saiurated wtth organic mater1aL lnter1ayarad 2-5" seams of fine sand and silt Gray slit (Ml) with seams of sandy silt. fine sand and brown sUl Gray sand (SP) @I 32.0'. SHEET 2 cl 3 REMARKS OVA• 170ppm @lntartace OVA= 100ppm In borehole OVA~ 1 ppm in 8.Z: OVA~ 50 ppm OVA~ 54 ppm Woodward-Clyde ConsuHa~ts e ,. DRILLING LOG (CON'n o Io I I It 0 ········ ········ ········ ········ ,•,·,··· ,., ..... ········ CAVE IN '•,•, . '•'• ' ... . ' ... . . ,,,, : :::: . ,:,: OPT S SIFT SAMP '!'o {Fl) T NO. .REC. 10 100 ,,-. 10 41 25 7 20 HQI.ENO. BH-258 CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS (DESCRIPTION) Brown gray slll {ML) 32.S' • 33.S'. Brown gray sandy sill will, clay and gravel @ 33.S'. SHEET 3 of 3 REMARKS OVA •30ppm Gray sandy gravel (GP) very danse w~h OVA = 2o ppm pockets 01 silt. Gravel to ~ • diameter. Woodward-Clyde Consulta~ts·~ DRILLING LOG I PROJECT: PROJECT NO. T SHEET OUENOALL 86004S , of 3 LOCATION: N 196,847 TOTAL f'.iQ. SAMPLES: 11 E 1.662 032 DRILLING A.GENCY: SOIL SAMPLING SERVICE OEPTH TO WATER BELOW GMO SURFACE: SFT HOLE NO. BH-269 DATE STARTED: 816190 I DATE COMPLETED: 816190 NAME OF CRII..LEfl: WAYNE GUY ORlWNG METliOD: HOLLOW STEM AUGER TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE: 48.5 FT INSPECTOR: DAVE WALKER . CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS DPT s SIFT SNM' ,r. REMARKS T.O.C +1.0'. -(FT) T NO. REC. (DESCRIPTION) ' , ' "'' , ' Brown sandy gravel (GP). I .tis.Ila; ~--"' -Stral)graphy from ""'8.5 ft -.,, ~:, bor-(-nad). -... ~ ... ,,, ~,-_, " ' ,,, ...J Well inltaled in 36 ft , ' -~I~ li: bofehde 4 ft west of ,, -- E11vfroplug .,, , abandoned borehOkl. .-, ,,, '--2-1-- Ben1Dnill!t ' ' •'' , Chips , ',' ' •,, -- ' , ' ',' Gray sandy silt (ML). wet. ' '' 1-3-,a 100 -,, , , ',' ' ' ' -,', ,', -,, , OVA=4Sppm •· blank . ' ,, , ' - stainless "";, ,_,, ateel . ' ,,, -Gray silty fine sand (SM). medium dense, -, , ' " ' casing , ,,, wet ,_,, '-5-10 75 • seams cl sandy silt @> 4.0'-4.5'. OVA. 9ppm I- , ,,, ,, • saturated@ s.<r. ,, , . , ' --,,, . ' ,,, •'' e--e-'--, ' •'• ,, , . ' ,,, , --. ' -silt seam@ 6.5'. ~:: •'' , .... ; ... -7-22 100 - " ',' Gray line to ccarse sand (SP), dense, OVA= 9 ppm(8.G.) ,, . ' , , -saturated, trace gravel, some wood -.. .,~ ,,, ,' -chunks. ,, '' - ,', ,_,, ~--•', -Fine sand below a.o·. -,, , .,, ,, •• ~-31 100 ,', t-', -,, •', , ' •', --,, , ,,, ,, ,_, 1--10-.......-OVA= 12 ppm I-,,, 1<, ,, •,• ,,, ,,, --,, ',' ,', ',' -11--,, ' \ ,, .... ~ ... --•'· ,,, ,, .,, ,, .,, 1-12-' -,, ""," "'' ,,, -- ,', ,,, ~--•,• 1-1:a-I--OVA• 75 ppm -•'• •,• , •,' ,,, -I - ",' ',' Brown organic si! (OL) soft, saturated '' , ' ,,, :~~ 1....-14-7 too with Wood fiber.;. -,,, , ',' ~> -\ - '' ,' •'• ,,, ,, ' l...-15-1.--.. f.- . .. -Woodward-Clyde Consultants e • HOLE NO. 5HEET • DRILLING LOG (CON'T) BH-26B 2 of 3 OPT s SIFT SAMP ... CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS REMARKS • (FT) T NO. REC. (DESCRIPTION) ' ' , , , Brown organic silt (OL) ' , ', ' ' , , • ' ' --,: ~~ 16 ', ~-n -' , ', ~~-' , ' , • ~-~~ 17 ,, ' ..,. ' , ' , ,' ,: ,' • , ,, ,a ' , ' , ' , ' 4 50 Gray fine sand (SP), loose, satura1ed. OVA~ 14 ppm ' ,' ' , ,, ' , ,, ti ll!fil: • ,, ' , OVA was OUl Of fuel at ' , ' , """10lellor> ol drlllng-, , ' ', OVA readings could ,, ' , ' , 20 be in 81'ror. ', , • ' ' , ., ' ' , , ' , ' , 21 . . • . . Elentonite . . . Pellets ·. . . . . 22 . . . • . ZI 53 50 Dense below 23.5". OVA• 45 ppm • 2, Slit seam @ 23.s·. ,. Stainless • Sl8el .010· 25 Slotted Seraer, • 26 • • Colorado 10-20 Peat and silt seams 28.0'·29.0". Wallpadc 39 50 OVA~ 45ppm • Gray fine sand below 29.0' silt seam (11 ·@ 29.5' • • Ill • Woodward-clyde Consultants~ ~ • HOLE NO . SHEET DRILLING LOG {CON'T) BH-268 3 ol 3 • DPT s SIFT SAMP ... Ct.ASSIFICA TION OF MATERIALS REMARKS (FT) T NO. REC. (DESCRIPTION) G·ray silt (ML) 33.2"-33.T with 2• brown 33 organic sin saam. 37 50 Waod 33. T -34.2'. Gray silty Rne sand (SM) with trace M gravel bea>mes Rne sand (SP) with gravel @ 33.5'. Gray sandy gravel (GP}, very dense, OVA = 5 ppm (B.G.) 3S satura18d. gravel to 1 ~·diameter. 3e • 37 ~ 38 52 50 OVA• 5 ppm 39 • • • 2 • 59 50 OVA-Sppm • • • 7 • 48 so,,.. 0 .. "" • ! Woodwan!~lyde Consulta~ts e I , I • I I I • I , • I I • • • • • • ORILLING LOG I PROJECT: OUENOALL LOCATION: N 197,376 E 1 662.640 DAIL.UNG 1-GENCY: SOL SAMPLING SERVICE HOL.ENO. BH-27 NAME OF DRR.1.ER: WAYNE GUY TOTAL OEPTM OF HOLE: 25FT T.0.C • 24.81 TO.C+o.5:j = L OPT s SAMP "' (FT) T &FT NO. REC. " ' ;.... ...; .. -......... ,;, ,; ... ',' '' ,-1- ' ' ,', ' ' :~~ , -" Et,viropiug ' ',' ,,, r-2-Ba,tonite ' ' , Ch;,,& ',' " , ' ' ' -' ,', ' ' ',' ',' r-l-tx 13-€. " ' ' 100 , ·,; ... '-' , ' ' ' ~ , .. ; .. ,' 1--t-.,, ' ' ·-' ,, , ' ,,, , , -,,, ',' ~,~ ',' -s-r---' ,,, •'• __ ) ,', , '-. ,,, ,, 23 75 ,', , ' ' ~;, ,, , '' , ' r,,.;, ;:: --,,, -7-..;__ '' , , '' ' ' , ,,, ',' -" ,', ' ' ',' ' ' -8-10 100 " ,', , ' ,', ,,, ,', -.. ;" ,', ._.,: ,,, ,,, , ' ,,, ' ' ~~: -.. ;~ , 7 100 '' -10-, ' ,,, , , ' ' ',' ' ' ' ' -' ' , ' ' ~ ~ -11--. . Ben""1lls ••• i-~--~: ... · ••• Pellet! ,·. .. ·. -12-,·. ,·. .. :: . .. -- C®rado t"':: 10-20 ·. ~13- Wellpad( -6 100 4• Slainless -1,4- Sleel.010" Slollad ----15- PROJECT NO. SHEET 860048 1 of 2 TOTAL NO. SAMPLES: 7 DEPTH TO WATER BELOW GAD SURFACE: B FT OATE STAATEO; B/1190 I DATE COMPLETED: B/1190 DRIWNG METHOD: HOLLOW STEM AUGER INSPECTOR: DAVE WALKER CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS - REMARKS (DESCRIPTION) Oallt brown cobbles (GP) OVA= 17ppm - with sand. - - - - -' - Dari< brown silty sand 3.0"-3.S". = OVA=60 ppm u. HC odor - - - Black sandy gravel@ 5.0'. -(111serrbles pieces of coal). - • OVAz 180 ppm - Gravely silty sand (SM). medium dense. - wet. trace organics. - - OVA =30 ppm - Brown peal (Pn, llbrous, some silt. - - - - - Gray clayey silt (ML), soft, OVA= 52 ppm - saturated . 2" Gray sand@ 11.0', - - - - Brown peat (Pn. OVA= 125ppm - - - - -· - Woodward-Clyde Consultants{# • , I • • • • • • .. • • II • • • • • • DRILLING LOG (CON'1) OPT s fFT) T 11 ~ 10-20 17 w.Jpadc ... _ 11 SIB<ll.010" --19 20 21 22 24 25 SMIP 8/FT NO. 6 7 HOLE NO. SHEET BH-27 2 of 2 "' CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS REMARKS REC. {DESCRIPTION) Brown peat (PT) Brawn organic sift (OL) with wood fiber,; at 17.5' 4"peatlayer@18.0' • 100 OVA• 15ppm lrnenayerad dayey sll (ML), nne sand (SP), and sandy siH (ML) Gray clayey sift 18.5'-19.0'. Gray fine sand 19.0'·19.5'. Driller thinks sand 19.5' to 22.S' Gray sandy siH (Ml) sott, sa1urated, w~h seams of clayey siH and silty sand, trace organics below 22.5'. 100 OVA•30ppm Woodward-Clyde ConsuUa~ts e Boring Log HC-2 Soil Descriotions Ground Surface Elevation 1n Feet: 23.JJ '""" I r very aense. damo. gray-Drown. silly. very sanely GRAVEL with cobOle'.i. Loose, damp, dark brown. silty, very gravelly SAND with rotted wood debris and coal-like particles with slight ctiemical-like odor. Loose, moist, tan-brown. very silty. fine SAND with wood Oebris. Loose. ~et. gray, coarse SAND -..,ith coaHike bih and strong chemical-like OCIOf. So ft. we!. dark brown. slightly s.andy SILT with organic debris. Loose, wet, gray. medium to tine SANO. saturated with yellowish viscous product. Very soft. wet, brown, sandy SIL 7 with wood debris anel debris. Loose. wet, gray, coarse SANO. Sort to very soft. wet. brown SIL i . ..,1th wood and organic decris. Very soft. wet. gray SILT. Very loose to loose. wet. gray. slightly silty SANO. Bottom of Sorin~ at 24.0 Feet. Completed 6/14/95 - t. Refer to Figure A-I for explanal1on of descr.::i :~~ and symbols.. 2. Soil descriptions and stratum lines are inter::·=~.~ dn(l actual changes may be gradual. -:-5 -·iJ -·5 -25 J. Ground waler leYel, if indicated, 1S al lime :ii :• .r.g (ATO) or for aate soec1f1ed. Level may vary ,o;r :1,11!= Samo1e s-, S-2 S-3 __s .\iO s-, S-5 5-3 5-r S-8 S-9 ST ANO ARO P:cNE TRH ION RESISTANCE • B!o)js per Foot 10 20 50 i I i i ! -I I - C _,v / V I ,_ i ,_ I I I ~ ' t ): I I ! . i I C 11 - 1 Ii I I \ I i/ i / i ' i ,_ I I ,_ I. ,_ I ; ! ,_ I I '' ' I I\ " I '\ r,_ " ~ I i I i I I I I I - - ,_ I I I I I I I ,_ I ,· i I ! ' i i i I I - I I ! " I ! I I I. I roo I I I i' 11 194 ' I I ' ' 10 .. o SD 100 • wate, Content 1n Percl!nt -... J-4042-04 Figure A-3 LAB TESTS & IPIDI ~ ~1f,,F' I CA (<1) (<:I] LG 1 s,, ,. ( I,, GS C.A !4) I:i. C:A 121 r l<:11 i •[A I 1<11 I 8/95 Boring Log HC-3 Gfouna Surface E1e~at1on 1r, Feet: 22.r2 Deptri ,n Feet Medium dense to 1case. :no1st. gr:::ly, very silly to silty SAND with some chemical-like odor. ~ Soft, wet. tirown SILT. ~ Very soft to soft, wet. gray SILT with a sand stringer. Meaium dense to very loose, wet. gray. silty to s1ightly silty SANO with a chemical-like odor. Very soft. wet. Drown. slightly sanely 11 :--._ S:LT with a slight chemicaH1ke odor. "\ Very !oose. ·..,et, gray, shghlly 5i/;,y SAND w,th ctiemicaHike odor. ~ ve~y soft to medium stiff, wet. brown .~ SILT with organic deOr1s and chemical-like odor. Soft. wet, gray S1L T with chemical-like odor. ~ r, ~ Very loose. wet. gray. slightly silty, Ii~ medium to fine SANO with chemical-like "' odor. ,' Very soft. wet. brown SILT with organic debris. Very locse. wet. gray. s\:ghtly si!'.y, fine SANO. Bottom of Boring at 25.CJ Fee+ .. Completed 6114/95. i L Refer lo Figure A-1 for explanation of descr1ot,on:, and symbols. 2. Soil desct'1ptions and stratum lines are 1nterprebe and actuar chariges may be gradual. f 5 10 ,- I L rs r ,L ' ;- I T20 L r L I r I J_ -o IJ ~ r I , ~ T-" ~ a L -.JC 3. Grour,d water level. if indicated. is al time of c'rillln·J (ATD) or for date soec1fied. Level may ·,ary with time s-, _5} 5-2 '10 5-J s-, s-s S-6 s-r s-a S-9 ST ANOARC FE~ETR..l -:-[c~~ F.E S ISTANCc / \ I/ I I;. / I 1' \ I I i I ; ,I I ; : : . ' ' 1, !i ,a • ' IC :'C 50 I : 1 l i ' I i i, ! ·oc· i I I ,I I I. 111, I 1 \ 11:1 I I I/! I , 1, I ,, I J· I I I I I ! ii I I 1 '.iO 00 • ·.~a:er [an:ent 1ri Per:e'lc -.. ,_t.6 -ES TS t. P!O: [J1i j l<l) I I (<ii IA ·:.:. [<II r l<•.I ' ;..IA. C.:. ! l<i) I :<11 I :...,Js I l<il Lr, I < I I I I I I L__ __ _ Hl.lRTCROWSER J-4042-04 Figure A-4 8/95 Boring Log HC-4 S01r Oe~cript1ons Grouna Surface Elevation 1n Feet: 24.57 :eOi., :-. ~= :: Med1um dense, damp, gray, s1tg11t1y silly. sligntly gravelly SAND with chemical-like oClor. Loose, wet, gray, silty, tine SANO with cflemicaHike odor. Loose. wet. bro\lin, silty, fine SANO with staining and chemical odor. Loose. wet. gray SANO saturateci with ore duct. Very soft, 1o1et, brown SILT -~ith orgarnc debris and chem1caHike odor. Solt, wet, gray, sandy SJL T wilh chemical-like odor. Lease. ~el. gray to gray-oro .... n . .,ery silty to silty SAND with chem1caH:ke ocor. very soft. wet. brown SILT ·~1th org.;n1: oc;ors. t..Jo:dium dense to loose. wei. gray, si:~:, t~ slightly silty SAND ,...ith slight c:iemical-like odor. Soft, wet, gray, ·,ery sanoy SILT with chemical-like odor. Ver·t loose. wet. grsy. 'Slightly 'Silty SANO with chemical-like odor Soft. wet, gr,ay SIL i, 3otlorn of Boring al 25.0 Feel. :ompieted 6/14/95. 1. Refer to Figure A-l for explanation of ces::ri:: :~: anc syrnools. 2. S01I Oescriotions and stratum 11nes are ·nt!;:!re;,-::· .~ ana actual i;lianges may be gradual. 3 Grou11d water level, ii 1nd1catec. is at L:me oi :· _ (ATO) or for date s:,ecif1ec. Leve' rnay ,a-~.,:- -.J - -··: s-, s-, 5-3 _') .!, Ti] s-, S-5 5-'5 5-, 5-3 S-9 s-:o s-11 5-12 ST ANOARO PENE-R.A TION RESISTANCE • Blows per Foot t IC io 50 !CO i i I- L - 111 I: I i I, ~ i' J. _/ i · 11 ,ti / Ii I Ii v 11 V, II: I ! . 2 I I ;ii 11 1 i '11: , I I' ! . I ! . I ' I Ii I I • !II; I I "Ii '' I. I ! ! ,! I I ' I 'I ; ii ii:' . I 1,' ' 11 ! I 1! , I I ; II I , i !I 1: I ' I ' : 1, ', · ''' : 1 I i I : i: I I' l I I l i ': ! 1' • water Content 1n ::ierce:st -.. J-4042-04 Figure A-5 & (P!Oi t,) c, 11 {14] [NAJ 110·, L Si 111 IJOJ 120) 8/95 Boring Log HC-5 S011 Descriptions Grouna Surlace Elevation 1n Feet: 26.47 Meaium dense ta loose. damp, gray-brown to dark brown. sligntly gravelly lo gravelly, very silty to silty, fine SANO with organic detms and cnem1cal-lik.e odor Soft, moist to wet, gray SILT wiih strong chem1cal-!ike odor and staining/sheen. Loose. wet, black SANO saturated with yellow-black viscous product. with a stringer of soft, wet. brown. slightly sandy SILT. Very soft, we!, Drown SILT with organic deoris. Medium dense. wet, gray SANO. Soft. we!, brown Sil T with organic ) k deor1s. I"'\ Loose, wet. gray SANO with wood debris / and chem1caHike odor. Bottom of Boring at 19.0 Feet. Comoleted 6/15/95 ! ' :. Reier to Figure A-1 for expla!'lal:on ol descriptio.,s and symtiols. 2. Soil aescnptions and stratum lines are interore:,.,,e and actual changes may Ce graC!ual. }o t I -7: I ~ f ,o i f- I f- -;5 I r -e-2c I ' r ~ ' -2: 30 3. Grownc water level. 1f 1na1cated. ,s at lime of er,11mg (ATO) or fer date speciiied. Level ma:, vary ..,,th time s-, S-2 --5) ATO S-3 s-, ' ::-5 ~ ''\ "1 --~ I I ' 5-: ST ANOARO PENETRATION ~.ESJSTANCE .., E!lcws oer Foot 5 10 20 "0 !00 . : I I ' I ! ~ // i I I r I t f-I/ I i ·/ i I I'-" ! " i I i 1 I ' i i ' I r ' I I I I '!' ~ I : 1' I r I ! 11 ~ L I I I , I r i I I f-i I I ' ' I I Ii' I I I I " I ~ i I I " !' I ' " I I I ! f-I I I I ~ I i I ' I i r I I I I I :I : -i I I r ~ I I I : l s ,a ~a 50 100 • water Content 1n Percent -.. LAB -ESIS & iPiOI C: ~ 110) lr, I l1BI ~IA i !<<C L-!A. :,\ INAI IIJJRTCROWSER J-4042-04 F~ure A-8 8/95 Boring Log HC-1 Grouno Surtace E1e ... at1on 1n Feet· 20.83 Oeotn .n Feet , Medium dense. moist. gray, shghtly silty, slightly gravelly SANO. Meaiurn dense, wet. dark brown, very silty, gra'llelly SAND with wood debrrs and oroduct sheen. Loose, wet, med:um to fine S~ND saturated with black viscous product. i Very soft, wet. brown SILT with organ,c Oet:ris. Bottom of Soring at :6.5 Feet. Completed 6/14/95. I. Refer to Figure A-1 lor eioranation of aescr1pt1c!"1S ana symt:iots. 2. Soil descriptions and stratum 1,nes are interpretive and actual cnanges may tie gradual. 5 tO 15 T20 I 25 3C 35 3. Ground waler level, if ,ndicated. is at time of drilling (ATC) or for date soec:fied. Level may vary w1lh time Samole s-1 _5} Ato S-2 S-3 S-4 s-s I ~ I I I ST ANO ARO PENETFAT!CN ~ESISTANCE .. Blows OE!I Foot ' 50 ~ I r I I ~ ii ~ I: I! . lV . I I I I " I fi 1 I ,, ,, 11 ll .. I i I .. I I .. 11 I .. .. C ' " I I I I L ' I . I I I I -.. I ' I C I ' ! .. I .. ! ' I I I I -.. I I ' ! ! I ' ~ 10 50 100 • wate'. Senter.: •n Percent .. u LAB TESTS G IP!CI !A, CA {<:) [A INAI IA. •'.=5 (<ll [A. ·:A (NA) (NA) IIJJRTCROWSER J-4042-04 F/gureA-8 8/95 ATTACHMENT A-2 Borings by Aspect § N "' N • , 'l' < ~ " ~ w m 0 &' " " ~ ~ i'i z w ~ 0 ~ ~ i'i z w ~ 0 g 0 ~ 5 z w < ~ w \ Aspectco~!u!~~2 Project Name Quendall Terminals Location Renton, WA Dnller/Method NW Probe J Push~Probe Sampling Method Continuous Core Depth/ Elevation (feet) Borehole CompleHon 5 7122/2009 10 15 Sampler Type: § No Recovery [] Continuous Core Samph:! TypeJID S1 S2 S3 $4 Pro1ect Number 020027 DRAFT Shoen/NAPL Comments metalic blebs 80% MC-1-10.5-11.5-S rainbow flouret blebs 90% blebs 75% blebs 75% rainbow 30% Sheen Product Material Typo NS NS MS HS 0 oc 0 0 0 MS 0 0 OS 0 0 0 HS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HS 0 0 0 0 oc 0 0 0 0 0 0 HS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MS Sorin Boring Number MC-1 Ground Surface Elev Depth to Water Start/Finish Date De$C1'iption Dry wood debris (FILL); trace gravel Sheet 1 of 2 5.5' ATD 7122/2009 Dry, gray to brown, silty, sandy GRAVEL (GM): Moist, dar1< gray, slightly gravelly SIL TY SAND (SM): trace wood becomes wet Wet, brown SILTY SAND (SM): Wet PEAT (PD; organic mat and leaves, Wet, blue gray SANO (SP): sand fine to medium, oil oated Wet, brown, sandy G VEL to gravelly SAND (SP-GP): oil coated to 11' oil stained from 11' to 12' oil coatecf from 12' to 17.5' Wet, brown gray SAND (SP): sand fine to medium, oil stained Wet. brown PEAT (PT): PIO -Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) Logged by: RRH y Static Water level Approved by: JJP '¥-Water Level (ATD) Fi ure No. A-2 Dep~ (fl) 5 10 15 Project Name Location Driller/Method Quendall Terminals Renton. WA NW Probe I Push-Probe Sampling Method Continuous Core Dep~/ Elevation (feet) 25 30 ~ 35 I ~ ,'. " ~ ill ~ ~ u " ~ ~ z w => CJ ~ z w 51----'--" Borlthole Completion g Sampler Type: 0 § No Recovery "' ~ [] Continuous Core w -· Type/ID S5 S6 S7 S8 Sheen/NA.PL Comm'"" metallic 90% 4% blebs >90% MC-1,26-27-S blebs :>90% rainbow 75%, florets blebs 100% Project Number 020027 DRAFT Sheen Product Material Type NS Borin Boring Number MC-1 Ground Surface Elev Depth to Water Start/Finish Date Sheet 2 of 2 5.5' ATD 712212009 _ =-Wet, olive gray ORGANIC SILT (OL); trace wood, -=== leaves and roots NS MS ss HS HS NS ow MS OS HS ow NS Wet, gray, slightly silty SAND (SP); 1" lense of gravelly sand, heavy oil staining oil wetted from 25.5' to 27', estimated 90 wt. viscosity : · Wet. gray, SIL TY SAND (SM); sand fine, silty · interbeds, heavy oil staining to 30.5' Wet, gray SILT (ML); ·. Wood in a SAND (SP) matrix; oil wetted to 31.5' metalic 40-50% MS Wet, gray SILT WITH SAND LAM)NEA (MUSM); sand fine OS Wet, gray and blue SAND (SP): sand fine, oil stained _ === Wet, olive gray ORGANIC S)L T (OL); NS ..{J·-1·· Wet. pink clayey SILT (VOLCANIC ASH) Dep~ (fl) 25 30 ___ Wet, olive gray ORGANIC SILT (OL); trace gravel F"~+,-,--~-~~-----------1-35 Wet. gray SAND (SP); sand fine to medium NS NS Wet. olive gray, sandy SJLT (ML-SM); with organics ·. Wet, gray SAND (SP); trace gravel, gravel fine to coarse and well rounded to subrounded Boring terminated 40 ft BGS PIO -Photoionization Detector {Headspace Measurement) .!. Static Water Level Logged by: RRH Approved by: JJP Yi-Water Level (A TD) ~ Fi ure No. A -2 wL..----------------------------------'-""==:......:..:...;:;... _____ __. Project Name Location Dnller/Method Quendall Terminals Renton, WA NW Probe/ Push-Probe 5 10 ~ ~ 15 i ~ " ~ ~ .. " ~ ~ ffi ~ a I ~j__.JL__ Continuous Core Borehole CompreOOl't 8/1112009 g Sampler Type: R No Recovery 11 I:=! ~ a Continuous Core w Sample Type/ID S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 Sheen/NAPL Comment! Sorin Project Number Boring Number Sheet 1 of 3 020027 MC-3 Ground Surface Elev DRAFT. Depth to Water Start/Finish Date 7' ATD 8/1112009 Sheeo Produe! NS NS NS NS NS Descnptioo Dry, brown. sandy SILT (FILL): with wood Wood waste (FILL) Slightly moist, gray to dark gray, silty. gravelly SAND (SM); slight creosote odor Wood waste (FILL) Moist, olive gray, ORGANIC SILT (OL) Wet. gray, SAND (SP}; sand fine ta medium ===== Moist, olive gray, ORGANIC SILT (OL) Wet, gray clayey SILT with silty SAND Jaminea (CL-ML) Wet. gray SAND (SP); sand fine to coarse. predominantly medium O,p~ {ft) L_'--'-J..-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-4--10 Wet, brown to gray, slightly silty SAND (SP): with PEAT laminae Wet, brown PEAT (PT) ""';;;,;.;i.,.,.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-+1s Wet. gray SAND (SP); sand fine to medium; trace wood -=-=-Wet, dark brown, slightly sandy ORGANIC SILT (OL): =-=-= with few SAND laminae Wet, brown PEAT (PT) PIO. Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) .!. Static Water Level Logged by: RR H Approved by: JJP 'Sl-Water Level (A TD) t Fi ureNo. A-2 wL--------------------------------------'-=""""-""-..:..;'-':::....-------' Borin Project Number Sheet 020027 2 of 3 Project Name Quendall Terminals Ground Surface Elev Location -'-R"e"'n"to"-n"-. "-W"A"----------~ DRAFT-Driller/Method NW Probe / Push-Probe Sampling Method Continuous Core ~ 0,,,lh, Elevation (feet) 25 30 ~ 35 I < § ::i m ~ ~ j § ~ z "l Ot-~- Borehale Completion g Sampler Type: 0 § No Recovery « ~ a Continuous Core w S-5 S-6 S-7 S-8 Sheen/NAPL s-Pcod«<t Commonts NS --- --- -- ----- -- ------ -- -- NS NS NS Depth to Water 7' ATD Start/Finish Date 8/11/2009 Descnplfon Wet. olive gray ORGANIC SILT (OL) PEAT layer Wet, dark brown PEAT (PT) Wet, olive gray ORGANIC SILT (OL) Pink, clayey SILT (VOLCANIC ASH) Wet, gray SAND to slightly silty SAND (SP); sand fine to medium, silt laminea Wet, gray, clayey SILT with SAND laminea (CH) Wet, gray SAND with clayey SILT laminea (SP); sand fine to coarse, predominantly medium; Wet, olive gray, slightly sandy SILT {ML) Wet, gray SANO (SP): sand fine to coarse, predominantly medium to coarse Wet, gray, sandy GRAVEL (GP); moderate creosote odor PIO -Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) Logged by: RRH ~ Static Water Level 'l-Water Level (A TD) Approved by: JJP Dep~ (0) 25 30 35 l Fi ure No. A • 2 W~------------------------------------~~-~-~--------~ ~ ~ w Project Name Location Driller/Method Sampling Method Quendall Terminals Renton, WA NW Probe/ Push-Probe Continuous Core Depth I Elevation (feet) Borehole Completion 5-• Type,1D . 45· ' 50 ' ' Project Number 020027 DRAFT Sheerv'NAPL Sheoo Prod,a Matenal Comments r,,,. Borina Loa I Boring Number MC-3 Ground Surface Elev - -,...._ Depth to Water Start'Finish Date Desaiption Boring terminated at 40 ft SGS I Sheet 3 of 3 7' ATD 8/11/2009 Depth (ft) - 50 >-55 51-.....J'--'----L-----.....JL.J __ ...J.. _____ .....J __ -L_L.J __ _,_ ___________________ J.__I Sampler Type: g 0 § No Recovery ~ ~ 0 Continuous Core w PIO -Photoionizalion Detector (Headspace Measurement) .!'. Static Water Level :Ii'. Water Level (A TD) Logged by: RRH Approved by: J JP £ Fioure No. A -2 wL..---------------------------------------'-:l!""'-:.:::::......:..;c...;::_ ______ ...J Project Name Location Driller/Method Quendall Terminals Renton. WA NW Probe / Push-Probe Sampling Method Continuous Core °"'~' Ele,ati<,n Borehole Corfl)letion (feet) 5 8/11/2009 10 ii 15 g Sampler Type: t:=::I No Recovery ~ t::l ~ a Continuous Core w S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 Project Number 020027 DRAFT Sheen Proa.Jet Matenal r,.. Ground Surface Elev Depth to Water Start/Finish Date Sheet 1 of 3 8'ATD 8111/2009 Ory, red brown, sandy SILT (ML-SM) with wood waste WOOD WASTE Moist, dark brown silty gravelly SAND Boulder ·. Wet. gray SAND (SP); sand fine to medium NS Dart< brown WOOD WASTE 5 ~~l--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-l-10 Wet, gray to brown, slightly gravelly, silty SAND (SW) .... NS NS Wet, gray, gravelly, sandy, SILT (ML. TILL FILL); slight creosote odor PIO -Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) Y. Static Water Level Logged by: R RH Approved by: JJP ¥' Water Level (A TD) ~ Fi ureNo. A-2 wL..-------------------------------------'-'===-.:..:....;;... ______ _, \ Aspectco~!u~~~~ Project Name Quendall Terminals Locat'lon Renton, WA Driller/Method NW Probe / Push-Probe Continuous Core Depth' Borehole CompleUon Elevation !teeo 25 30 ii 35 ~ t " " w ! ~ u ~ ~ z ~ I w 5, j__.:L.__ Sampler Type: § A No Recovery ll 1::1 ~ a Continuous Core w -Type/ID S-5 S-6 S-7 S-8 Sheen/NAPl Comments Borin Project Number Sheet 020027 2 of 3 Ground Surface Elev DRAF.T Depth to Water S'ATD Start/Finish Date 8/11/2009 s-"'°""' Matenal Description NS NS NS NS NS NS Type sand laminae from 21 to 22.5 gray SAND layer Wet. gray, slightly silty SAND with silty SAND laminae (SM/SP) Wet, brown PEAT (PD Wet. brown PEAT (PD ·. Wet, gray SANO (SP); sand fine to medium ·. Wet, gray, gravelly SAND (SP}; sand fine to coarse, predominantly medium .,;.,',.,.,e4-------------------I Wet, gray, sandy, clayey SILT (ML) Pink, clayey SILT (VOLCANIC ASH) Wet. gray SAND (SP): sand fine to medium Wet, gray, very gravelly SANO (SP) PIO -Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) .J. Static Water Level Logged by: RR H Approve<! by: JJP Water Level (ATD) oe,• '"' 25 35 l Fi ure No. A -2 w'---------------------------------------'-'="'-'='--~_..,;=---------' ~ ~ N ~ , % o'. " 00 w m 0 " a. " ,. ~ ~ i'i z w :, 0 ~ ~ z w :, 0 8 ~ 0 " ~ w < a. w Project Name Location Quendall Terminals Renton, WA Driller/Method NW Probe/ Push-Probe Sampling Method Continuous Core Dep111 / Ele,iation (feet) -, _, 45· . . 50 . . -- 55· .. . . . Bofehole Completion Sampler Type: § No Recovery a Continuous Core Sample Type<O Project Number n2nn07 .. DRAFT -~ ·····--- .. -·--. .. - Borina Loa Boring Number MC-6 Ground Surface Elev Depth to Water I Sheet 3 of 3 8'ATD Start/Finish Date 811112009 Sheen/NAPL Comments Sheen Product Material Type Description Boring terminated 40 ft SGS PIO -Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) :!. Static Water Level ~ Water Level (A TD) Logged by: RRH Approved by: JJP Fiaure No. A -2 Dept, (fl) C L C c45 . - - -50 - - - - -55 - . Project Name Location Driller/Method """'" Elevation (feet) 5 10 ii 15 Quendall Terminals Renton. WA NW Probe/ Push-Probe Continuous Core Borehole Compjetioo 13/11/2009 -Type/ID S-1 Borehole bar;:ktill9d With 1.-...ie------l hydrated bentonile S-2 S-3 S-4 Pro1ect Number 020027 DRAFT- Sheen/NAPL Comments sheen dissipates quickly multicolored metallic motor oil-like viscosity brown blebs Sheen Product Mateoal r,,,. ss OS MS HS ow oc HS NS Borin Boring Number MC-8 Ground Surface Elev Depth to Water Start/Finish Date Oesctiption Sheet 1 of 2 4' ATD 8/11/2009 Dry. red bro'M'I, sandy SILT (ML); with wood and rootlets Wet, dark brown PEAT (PT) Wet. dark bro'M'I to gray SAND (SP); with trace wood Becomes gray, fine to medium Becomes fine Wet. brown, slightly silty SAND (SP) Wet, brown PEAT (PT) Wet. gray SAND (SP); fine to medium sand C!I Sampler Type: 9 i::==:l No Recovery IE t::i PIO -Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) .f. Static Water Level Logged by: RRH Approved by: J JP ~ a Continuous Core w Water Level (A TD) o.,• (NJ 5 10 15 ~ Fi ure No. A -2 wL..-------------------------------------'-=:.::..c:::c'---'-'-'=---------' Project Name Location Driller/Method Quendall Terminals Renton, WA NW Probe / Push-Probe Sampling Method Continuous Core ~ 0,,,~ I EJevaUon (feet) 25 30 ~· 35 ' t ~ ~ ~ i:! I, ~ u ~ ~ z w a I Borehole Comp!elicn 5.lmple Type/ID S-5 S-6 ProJect Number 020027 DRAFT Sheen Product Material Type Ground Suriace Elev Depth to Water Start/Finish Date Description Wet, brown PEAT (Pl1 Sheet 2 of 2 4'ATD 811112009 Wet, gray SAND (SP); fine to medium sand SIity sand Oep~ (ft) Wet. gray, gravelly SAND (SW); fine to coarse sand ~-~·~·~·-i-,.,,-----~~--~---------+-•25 Wet. gray SAND (SP); fine to medium sand Wet, gray SAND {SP); fine to medium sand i'--"'-'-l---------------+30 Bottom of boring at 30' 35 Bt----'---'--_J-----_J-'---'------J_-_J_ _ _. __ c_ _________________ ..1-_1 Logged by: RRH Sampler Type: § R No Recovery :i1 l:c:l ~ a Continuous Core w PlD -Photoionizatlon Detector (Headspace Measurement) ~ Static Water Level Approved by: JJ P Water Level (A TD) l Fi ure No. A -2 wL...-----------------------------------'-""=='-...:...:.....::..._ _____ __, Project Name Location Quendall Terminals Renton. WA Driller/Method NW Probe I Push-Probe Sampling Method Continuous Core Dep~ I Elevation (""1) Borehcie Completion 5 8/'10/2009 10 15 § Sampler Type: t::=:l No Recovery IE ~ ~ a Continuous Core w Sample Type/ID S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 Sheon!NAPL Comment, Project Number 020027 Sheen Product Metenal Type NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS ~~r. . · ... ) .... . ·. : . Borin Boring Number MC-10 Ground Surface Elev Depth to Water Start/Finish Date Sheet 1 of 2 8' ATD 811012009 Ory, brown, gravelly, silty SAND (SM); abundant wood Wood debris dark brown 2.0' -2.5' Moist. brown, SAND (SP); trace gravel, predominantly fine sand, fine to medium sand Wood 4 5. 4.7' Moist, gray SAND (SP); predominantly fine sand, coarsens with depth, fine to medium sand Moist. olive gray, organic SlLT (OL): with rootlets Wet. gray SAND (SW) interlaminated with silty SAND (SM) Wet, darl< brown PEAT (PT) Wet. gray, SAND (SP); fine to medium sand Wet, gray silty SAND (SM); fine sand Wet. gray, SAND (SP); fine to medium sand Wood 16' Wet, brown PEAT (PT) PIO -Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) Logged by: RRH ~ Static Water Level 'Sl Water Level (A TD) Approved by: JJP 5 10 15 ~ Fi ure No. A -2 wL-------------------------------------...:,;=c::.:,,::;_..:..,:_::;_ ______ _, Project Name Location Quendall Terminals Renton. WA Driller/Method NW Probe I Push-Probe Sampling Method Continuous Core Borehole Completion 25 30 Sampl• Type/ID S-5 S-6 S-7 SheerJNAPL Commert, Project Number 020027 Stieen Product Material Typo Ground Surface Elev Depth to Water Start/Finish Date ~oiption Sheet 2 of2 8'ATD 8110/2009 NS ·. Wet, gray, slightly silty SAND (SP); predominanUy fine sand NS NS Wet, brown PEAT (PT) Wet. ra SAND SP : fine to medium sand Wet, brown PEAT (PT) Wet. gray SAND {SW); trace gravel, fine to coarse sand D,pth (ft) H·~·~·~·,4..,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~j..25 Wet. gray, silty SAND (SM): trace gravel, fine to coarse NS NS NS sand ·. Wet, gray SAND (SP); medium to coarse sand Fine to coarse sand Wet, olive gray, organic SILT to PEAT (PT-OL) Wet, gray, silty SAND (SM); trace wood, trace gravel. fine sand -=-=-Wet, olive gray. organic silt (OL): with laminae of silty =-=-= sand Wet. brown PEAT (PT) -=-=-Wet, olive gray. organic silt (OL); with laminae of silty -----sand Approved by: JJ P 30 Proiect Number 020027 Project Name Quendall Terminals Borin Boring Number MC-14 Ground Surface Elev Sheet 1 of 2 Location ~R~e~n"to~n~-~VV~A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Driller/Method NW Probe I Push.Probe Depth to Water Start/Finish Date 5'ATD Sampling Method Continuous Core g Depth/ Elevation {feet) 5 10 15 Borehole Completion 811"'2009 R No Recovery ii? t:cl ~ a Continuous Core w S-• Type/ID S-1 S-2 S-3 Sheen Prodi;ct Matenaj Type NS NS NS .. . . .. . . NS 8/10/2009 DesCl'iplion Moist, gray SAND (SP); fine to medium sand Olive rav Sfl T ML Moist, brown, silty SANO (SM); abundant organics and wood Wet. gray, gravelly SAND (SW); fine to coarse sand Wet, gray SAND (SW); trace gravel, trace wood, predominantly medium sand. fine ta coarse sand Wet, dark brown, fiberous PEAT (PT) Wet, brown SAND (SP); fine to medium sand Wet. dark brown, sandy PEAT (PT) VVet. dark brown PEAT (PT) PIO -Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) .!. Static Water Level Logged by: RRH >i'. VVater Level (A TD) Approved by: JJP Dept/, (ft) 5 10 15 ~ Fi ure No. A ~ 2 wL-------------------------------------...;...=;.:.c=--'--'-'C....------~ ,'. <!) "' ill :? a. <..> " ~ z w => 0 Project Name Location Quendall Terminals Renton, WA Driller/Method NW Probe / Push-Probe Sampling Method Continuous Core """"I Elevation (feet) 25 30 0 S-5 S-6 S-7 S-8 SheenlNAPL '°"""""' Moderate creosote-like odo ~ z Slight creosote Project Number 020027 Sheer'I Product NS NS NS NS NS Ground Surface Elev Depth to Water Start/Finish Date Sheet 2 of 2 5'ATD 811012009 Wet, brown PEAT (PT): few sand laminae · ·:. Wet, brown to gray slightly silty SAND (SP}; trace wood ""'~ (ft) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~---1~25 Wet. olive gray organic SILT interlaminated with PEAT (OUPT) Thin bed volcanic ash(?) Wet, gray, slightly silty, slightly gravelly SAND (SW); fine to coarse sand Wet, olive gray organic SILT (OL) Wet. gray, sitty SAND (SM); fine sand Peat Wet ilt AN M · fine sand Wet. gray SAND (SP); fine to medium sand Wet, gray, slightly sandy SILT (ML); fine sand Wet. ink da e silt CL · volcanic ash Wet, gray, slightly sandy SILT (ML); fine sand Wet, gray, slightly gravelly SAND (SP); predominantly medium sand Wet. gray, silty SAND (SM); fine sand Wet, gray, gravelly SAND (SP) 30 35 §1--'-....L"""""""-------'>a<l--..L--o-d_o_r __ _,_wu __ L....:.....J..=B=ott~o~m:;.::.o~f=bo~r~in~g~.~4=0·~B~G=S=-----------1--I PID -Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) logged by: RRH "' Sampler Type: 9 R No Recovery ~ t:::l ~ a Continuous Core w ~ Static Water Level Approved by: JJ P Water Level (ATD) ?t Fi ure No. A -2 wL..-------------------------------------'-'===-.:..;,....:::....-------' ii N ~ N ~ ~ < o'. " ~ ~ 0 ~ g f-~ :, " :, < J ~ w :, 0 J J cl z w :, 0 ~ 0 "' > z w < ~ w \ Aspectca~~)~~~ Project Name Quendall Terminals Location Renton. WA Driller/Method Cascade I Rotarv Sonic Sampling Method Continuous Core o.,,~, Elevation (feet) Borellole comp1e~on s.m, .. TypeAD 1 . 2· 3 - 4 5 - 6 7 - 8 9 - 10 11 · 12· 13· 14· 15· 16 17· 18 19- Temporary 8" steel casing 0..57 Temporary 6" !18el casing 0.99' Sampler Type: § No Recovery [I Continuous Core ~ - . Borina LoQ Project Number Boring Number ' BH-20-C I Sheet 1 of 8 DRAFT -Ground Surface Elev - Depth lo Water 13' ATD SheervNAPL Comments Creosote-like odor ---... Start/Finish Date 8/3/2009-8/5/2009 Slieen Product Material Type Description Dep~ 1•1 NS NS Dry, brown, silty. very sandy GRAVEL (FILL); abundant asphalt and concrete debris, trace wood " 1 IE:,<;:~l-;:----,---,--,-,,---,,,-..,,.==,.,,-,---,--+2 Dry, brown slightly silty SAND (SM); trace gravel >)< I IE:,<;:~l-;:--,,.-,-----,C"7=c-=,.,.,-.,----,----,-+4 95< Dry. Dark gray gravelly SAND (SW); trace asphalt and ~~ wood 1"""""4------~----------+5 Dry, brown SAND (SP); fine to medium . : .. T : ·\ .\. · _·. No Recovery from 6' to 1 O' l. ': 6 -8 9 l.l-,c,-:-,---,-,----,,-,-,:--,,.,----,'"""'e77ecc-,,,.,-,,-+-1Q Slightly moist, brown. slightly silty, gravelly SAND (SM): 11 ~-'-t-,-,--~.,-.,.~---,:-:-:-::,-.,,,,cc--,,----cc-~~~----t-12 Very moist, brown SAND (SP); trace silt )-,-c,-..+,,-----:~-~-----------+-13 Wet. gray SAND (SP) ~ ..... -1-:,,,..,.-,-~-.,-,-,,--~-=,=-=-.,.,.,c=--"'7'=-,C-,C--,-+-14 Wet. brown, slightly sandy ORGANIC SILT (OL) f-=---c-__ Very slight odor NS --'""""",i--;w-;-;-e~t,7b-ro_w_n-:,P~EA-cc;T~(~P~T)~;-m_o_d~e-ra~t-e)~y~fi~b~e-ro-u-,~~~~-t-15 NS 1 /8" sand laminea PIO -Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) .!. Static Water Level "l Water Level (ATD) Logged by: RRH Approved by: JJP Fioure No. A-2 f-17 •18 >-19 \ Aspectco~u!~~! Borina Loa Project Number I Boring Number I Sheet 020027 BH-20-C 2 of 8 Project Name Quendall Terminals Ground Surface Elev Location Renton, WA DRAFT -Driller/Method Cascade / Rotarv Sonic Depth to Water 13' ATD -Sampling Method Continuous Core Start/Finish Date 8/3/2009-8/5/2009 Dep~/ Borehole Compleilon -· Shoon -Ma!erial Dop4h Elevation Shoon/NAPL Typo DescopUon (feet) Ty~D -· [ft) becomes dark brown 21-L21 22 ·22 NS Wet, brown, slighlly gravelly SIL TY SAND (SM); 23·1-ornanic silt laminea 23 Wet, gray SAND (SP); 24 Slight odor NS Wet. gray, very gravelly SAND (SW); sand fine to 24 coarse predominately medium, gravels fine and sub 25·1- rounded, decrease in gravel with depth 25 NS Yellow to yellow ~ Wet, brown PEAT (PT) brown blebs HS 26 C -26 --::-::--Wet, olive gray, slightly sandy ORGANIC SILT (OL); 27 1-=-=-= c27 1---::::-:::::- Slight odor NS .· .. Wet, olive gray, slightly silty SAND (SP); sand fine to 28· medium, trace organics ·28 .. 29· Temporary 8" steel -29 casing 0-57' I Wet, brown PEAT (PT); trace gravel 30 Slight odor NS -30 Wet, gray SAND to SlL TY SAND (SM); 31· >. Wet, gray SAND (SP) 31 Slight odor NS : · Wet. gray SIL TY SAND (SM); sand fine 32· T9fTl)Of"ary 6" steel 32 casing0.99' lense of volcanic ash NS --Wet, olive gray ORGANIC SILT (OL) 33· Wet. olive gray, sandy SILT (ML); trace gravel, trace 33 organics 34· NS 34 35· ·35 36 .. _·. Wet, gray. gravelly SAND (SP); sand fine to medium 36 37-· .. ·37 .. 38 Slight creosote NS 38 odor .. 39 ·39 < .· . Sampler Type: PID . Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) Logged by: RRH § No Recovery :? Static Water Level Approved by: JJP [I] Continuous Core 5l Water Level (A TD) IS] Finure No. A-2 BorinQ LoQ Project Number 020027 I Baring Number BH-20-C Project Name Location Driller/Method __1Q~u~e.i:in!1d.§al_!IIJT~e~r.i:im:i_,i.i:in§a~ls;_ ____ r------:----,.,_ Ground Surface Elev Renton, WA Cascade / Rotarv Sonic Sampling Method Continuous Core 0.,,lh I Eleva~on {feet} 41- Borehole completion Sample Type/ID SheerVNAPL Commeoa DRAFT= Sheeo Product M81erial Type Depth to Water Start/Finish Date Description becomes slightly gravelly NS I Sheet 3 of 8 13' ATD 81312009-81512009 Deplh (ft) 41 ..=::---+,.,,----,,-~=-------------! Wet, gray SAND (SP); sand fine to medium 42 42 43-rempaary s· sjeej casingo.57' NS L.c--4--------------------+43 Wet. brown, slightly gravelly SAND (SP): 44-44 45· Temporary 6" steel casing 0..99· Slight odor NS - .· . ·_ L-:-.:...-'-l---------------------1-45 Wet. gray SAND (SP); sand fine to medium 46 47 NS 48 49· 50 Slight odor NS 51 52 NS ~-- Wei, gray, slightly gravelly to gravelly SAND (SP): increasing gravel with depth : · _·. 6" lense of gray sandy GRAVEL, sand fine to medium. gradational contact 46 48 ~49 50 52 53· Very slight odor NS l-,,~"""'~--~--~~------~~--1-53 Wet. gray, slightly silly to silty, ver; gravelly SAND (SM) bentonrte seal 52'-57' 54 ~ ~55 ~ • ~· ~ Wet, gray, gravelly SANO (G'vV); sand fine to medium ~ 56 o.o. ~ oaoo ~ ·c·c t; 57-NS Q• 8• ~ ,·b·~ o.o. ~ oooa ~ 58 • 0 C ffi ~o 56 t-57 58 5 't:t ';;' O Wet. gray, silty, very sandy GRAVEL to very gravelly ..i 59 Tempora,y s· steel Slight odor NS o c SAND (GW); sand well graded fine to coarse ~ casing 0-99' 0 • 8" ~59 ~ 1-·~·~ 1ji~-L---L--L-1.-1. ______ ._~_._ __ ,L_ _____ ...J... __ l-_...1J<o:,_._,o:,_._._ ___________________ .L.._ g Sampler Type: c=::J No Recovery ii! t:::I ~ [I) Continuous Core ;[ l:il "' PIO -Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) -'-Static Water Level ¥'. Water Level (A TD) Logged by: RRH Approved by: JJP Fioure No. A-2 m ~ ~ ~ S' < o'. <!) 00 \I z 0 00 g r 00 " <!) " < J J cl z w " 0 J J ~ z w " a ~ 0 ~ > z w < ~ w Project Name Location Driller/Method Sampling Method Quendall Terminals Renton. WA Cascade I Rotarv Sonic Depti I Elevation (f~t) 61-- 63-1- 64 65- 66 67· 69 70· 71-1- 72-1- 73 74-1- 75 76· 77· 78· 79 Continuous Core Borehole Completion Temporary 6" steel casing 0-99' Sampler Type: § No Recovery [I] Continuous Core l'5l Samplo Type/ID Project Number 020027 I -·---- Boring Log Boring Number BH-20-C Ground Surface Elev DRAFT = Deptl1toWater -Comments Sheen Produci Material Typo Start/Finish Date Descflption I Sheet 4 of 8 13' ATD 8/312009-8/512009 Wet, brown. SAND (SP); sand fine to medium .... -.. NS O,pti 1ft) i't-i+r-,+-,-"'"'..,....-......,==-==-=~-..,..,,------r--,52 J t 11. · Wet, brown, SIL TY SAND (SM); sand fine water sample ' HZOC-63.5-64-W taken with hydro punch NS NS NS water sample NS I H20C-72.5-73-W ~ taken with hydro punch NS NS NS _:_ . .. ·. _. .-.. Wet. brown SAND (SP); sand fine to coarse predominately medium, trace gravel Wet. brown, slightly silty to silty. gravelly SAND (SM): sand fine to coarse Wet, brown SAND (SP) sand fine to medium, trace fine -63 64 ·65 66 -67 ~68 r69 ~70 ~71 72 -73 74 graver ·75 -76 ~~~·+,-;.,..,.-,--~-=-==c--~--~~~-~~ · · Wet, brown SAND (SP); sand fine to medium 77 -78 -79 PIO -Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) Logged by: RRH Approved by: JJP Fioure No. A-2 ~ Static Water Level ':CJ. Water Level (ATD) \ Aspectco~,:u.11!~~ Borina Loa Project Number I Boring Number I Sheet 020027 BH-20-C 5 of 8 Project Name Quendall Terminals Ground Surface Elev -Location Renton, WA ·DRAFT·· C-- Driller/Method Cascade I Rotarv Sonic C--Depth to Water 13' ATD Sampling Method Continuous Core Start/Finish Date 81312009-81512009 D,p~/ Bofeoole Compleijon S"""e Sh"° Prndoct Material Dep~ Elevation Sheen.lNAPL Description /feet) Type/ID c-,,,. {fl) ~119nt ocfor sand is predominately fine water sample I H20C-80.5-81-W~ ... ·. -: 81· taken with hydro NS -~ 81 punch Wet, brown SANO (SP); sand fine to medium predominately medium 82 NS .:.....:...;, . Wet. brown SAND (SP); sand fine to medium 82 -'-- 83· ~83 ·.·.·. 84 NS >-84 . Wet, gray SAND (SP); sand fine to medium 85· ~s5 .· ... 86 NS ~86 . 87· t?\ 87 Wet. gray, gravelly SAND (SW); gravel fine to coarse 88 NS 88 ~::;··· Wet, gray, slightly gravelly SAND (SP); sand fine to 89 Temporary s~ steel medium, gravels fine 89 c.asing 0-99' Water sample collected 90 ~go 91 grades to predominately medium sand, trace gravels, >-91 gravels fine lo coarse, subangular to subrounded .. 92 ~]. Increase in gravels 92 -: .. <· 93· 93 Wet, gray, slightly gravelly to gravelly SAND (SW); sand fine to coarse predominately medium, gravels fine 94 to coarse, subrounded to subangular 94 95 >-95 96 96 97 Wet, gray SAND (SP); sand fine lo medium 97 predominately fine 98 ' sill laminea between 98' and 98.5' 98 99 Water sample collected 99 No soil sample collected between 99' and 100' Sampler Type: PID -Photoionizalion Detector (Headspace Measurement) Logged by: RRH § No Recovery .?: Static Water Level JJP (I] ConUnuous Core Approved by: ,,;: Water Level (ATD) e'il Fiaure No. A-2 \ Aspectco~!u~~~~ Borina Loa Project Number I Boring Number I Sheet 020027 BH-20-C 6 of 8 Project Name Quendall Terminals Ground Surtace Elev Location Renton, WA "-- DrillerfMethod Cascade I Rotarv Sonic DRAFT: Depth to Water 13' ATD "-- Sampling Method Continuous Core Start/Finish Date 81312009-8/512009 • ···-r •• ' ""'"' Borehole Completion Sam,,, She,n """'"" Material "'"" E!evaUO!'I SheenfNAPL Description (feeO T-D Comments Type (fll ~ Wet. gray SAND (SP): trace silt laminae ' 101-' •101 .. ~ ' Hydropunch sample 8H-20C-101.5-102-W6 collected 102--',;: .· at 15:15 ·102 .. ' 103-' 103 ' 10•H ~ -104 105-~ _. · : 30' heave at 100' -105 ' 10& ' "ii 106 \ 107-' -107 .. ' 108 ' -108 ~ ' 109 ' -109 .. ' ' 110, ~ Wet. gray SAND with very thin beds of SILT (SP/ML); 110 ' ' sand fine to medium 1a, ' -111 ' ' .. · -Wet. gray SAND (SP); fine to medium sand 112-' 112 I\. 11:i, ~ •113 ' _. .. 11~ \ .. 114 r--_. I\. .. 115-~ .. •115 .' ·: ·.· 2-' heave .. 11& ' l-116 ' \ _. .. 11, ' 117 .... < Hydropunch sample BH-20C-117.5-118-W9 collected 11& ~ _. -.·: at 16:45 -118 ' 119 ' 119 ' _. ' Sampler Type: PIO -Photoionizalion Detector (Headspace Measurement) Logged by: RRH § No Recovery !'. Static Water Level I] Continuous Core ,;,_ Approved by: JJ P Water Level (ATD) l'Sl Fiaure No. A-2 '. Aspedco~~!~~2 Borino Loo Proiect Number Boring Number I Sheet 020027 BH-20-C 7 of 8 Project Name Quendall Terminals Ground Surface Elev -- Location Renton, WA DRAFT -- Driller/Method Cascade I Rotaru Sonic Depth to Water 13' ATD - Sampling Method Continuous Core Start/Finish Date 8/3/2009-8/512009 Deplh / -Sheen Proouct Matenal O,plh Elevation Borahole Gomple~on SheervNAPL Descnption (feel) Type.-1D Comrnef11S Type (ft) ' ---- ' 12} ' ' 1-121 " 122 'ii Wet, gray, Silty SAND with clayey Sll T and SILT 122 ' laminae (SM/ML) 123 ' 1-123 ' ' 124 r,;; Wet, gray, slightly silty SAND (SP-SM); fine sand 124 ' 125 " -125 ' ' 128 \ -126 -- " 127 ' 127 ' ' 128 ~ H2a " 129 ' f-129 ' I'\ • 130 " = . \';layey SILT (ML); in shape of sampler barrel 130 ' : • heave at 130' 131 " Wet, gray SAND (SP); trace gravel. fine to medium sand 131 ' --. ·_. " _- 132 " ";-'-: · ... Wet, gray, gravelly SAND (SW,: gravel to 3" diameter 132 ::::}: "' Hydropunch sample BH-20C-132.5-133-IJV6 collected 133 '.'lo ~·.:;··.· 133 I'\ Wet, gray SAND (SP); trace gravel, trace silt, fine 10 medium sand 134 ~ 134 Wet, gray, gravelly SAND (SP); trace silt, fine to I'\ · medium sand 135 I\ 135 ' I\ 13, r,;; 136 ' 137 I\ 137 ' Wet. gray. silty CLAY (CH); laminated (glaciolacustrine) I\ 138 l"i 138 ' 13S ' H39 I'\ I\ Sampler Type: PIO -Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) Logged by: RRH § No Recovery ~ Static Water Level Approved by: JJP [[] Continuous Core '¥-Water Level (ATD) ~ Fioure No. A-2 Project Name Location Driller/Method Quendall Terminals Renton. WA Cascade I Rotarv Sonic Sampling Method Continuous Core O,,,~ I Elevation (feel) 14} 142 143 144 145- 14& 14r- 14&> 149 150 15} 152 153 ~ ~ 154 <l 155 ~ ~ ~ u ~ 156 g ~ 151 ~ ~ ~ 15& z w il 3 159- ~ w Borehole Corrpletion -~· Type/ID Project Number 020027 I BorinQ LOCI Boring Number BH-20-C Ground Surface Elev DRAFT_.-Depth to Water Start/Finish Date SheeNNAPL Comments ShN!l Product Material Typo Bottom of boring at 140' I Sheet 8 of 8 13' ATD 8/3/2009-8/5/2009 °""' (tt) -141 -142 -143 H44 145 146 147 H48 149 "150 f,151 152 "153 f,154 -155 -156 -157 -158 159 5t---'---'---'------''-'---'-------'----'---'---L------------------...L-J Logged by: RRH § Sampler Type: PIO -Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) @ § No Recovery :f. Static Water Level W ~ [fl Continuous Core :jl. Water Level (ATD) if ~ Fiaure No. A-2 w L.:::'---------------------------------~~:::c.:.:.::::.......:...::.:=-------_J Approved by: JJP Project Name Location Quendall Terminals Renton. WA Driller/Method NW Probe / Push-Probe Sampling Method Continuous Core Depth I E!evatiC(l {feet) 5 10 Borehole Completion 712112009 Sample Type/10 51 52 Tests ,· ,1 ~,' ~ '·~"~' ~4~~~. '!'. '-~ijit ' -i~,)' ·l~ '. (J sti,¥4..5 sheen ~ , test (no sheen, · ·:ii, J 20% florets, semi I circle blobs) 54 ST/16 sheen test (moderate sheen, 35-40% florets, blobs) 16.5-18.5 heavy sheen, oil wetted QP-1-17-18.5 ST/19 sheen test {moderate sheen Pro1ect Number 020027 Sorin Boring Number QP-1 Ground Surface Elev Depth to Water Start/Finish Dale Sheet 1 of 2 6 5' ATD 712112009 PIO (ppm) Blows/ Matenal Description .... 6" Type Loose, dry, brown, s(ighUY.,;l/lV!l'i 10 sandy SILT (ML); sand fine, trace gravels~~ ,,organics Wet, brown silty SAND (SM); sand fine to medium redominantl fine abundant r anics . : : Wet, gray SAND (SP); 1/2" peat lens and 14.5 becomes gray lo brown banded fine to medium sand (SP) Staining from 14.5' to 16.5 _._ .•.. +. =------==-~--~----i Wet, gray to brown SAND (SP); fine to medium, abundant organic fiberous organics, oil wetted from 16.5' to 18.5' Soil sample collected from 17' to 18' SGS'. (Sample ID: P-1-17-18-S Wei. brown, sandy ORGANIC SILT (OL); wet. brown, PEAT (PT); non fiberous § Sampler Type: ~ § No Recovery PID -Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) .!. Static Water Level Logged by: RRH Approved by: JJ P § a Continuous Core > 'l-Water Level (ATD) D,plh (fl) 10 15 ili, .... ____________________________________ _;_F;.i e:"c:re:..:.,:N;::O'--. .....;Ac.:..-..;2::.. ______ _, Project Name Location Quendall Terminals Renton. WA Driller/Method NW Probe I Push-Probe Sampling Method Continuous Core Clep~/ Elevauon (feet) 25 Sam~• Type/ID S5 Tests ST/21 sheen lest (slight sheen, 3% ST/24.5 sheen test (no sheen) 1.-.J.----l S6 Project Number 020027 PtD Blows/ Matelial (ppm) 6" Type Ground Surface Elev Depth to Waler StarUFinish Date Sheet 2 of 2 6.5' ATD 7/21/2009 ~ (ft) 30 Wet, brown ORGANIC SILT (OL); !=-'=-=+------------------+-30 ;; ~ ~ :;; ! ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ z Boring terminated at 30 fl BGS 35 "l "+--'--.l....---'------.l....L....-...L. ____ _J __ L.__.L...._...L. ________________ _1__, ~ SamplerType: Logged by: RRH ~ § No Recovery ~ [] Continuous Core PIO -Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) !. Static Water Level Sl-Water Level (ATD) Approved by: JJP ~ w 1 .__ ____________________________________ ...;F...;i,.u::;r..:e..;N.;;o".--'-A.;...-..:2:-. ______ _. Project Name Quendall Terminals Project Number 020027 Location Renton. WA -==~~-----------------0 r i II er/Method NW Probe I Push-Probe Sampling Method Continuous Core Bof'ehole Completion 5 , .. ~ ST/13.5 sheen test (no sheen) slight odor ST/5.5 sheen test (no sheen} PID BloNs/ Material {ppm) fi' Type Ground Surface Elev Depth to Water Start/Finish Date Sheet 1 of 2 7.5' ATD 7/21/2009 sandy SILT (ML); trace "'"" [ft) 5 10 i'l4,.,,.--,----,"""''""'",=-""',----,-,----,--,-.---J..10 Wet, brown, silty SAND (SM); sand fine, abundant ~ ~ § ::J ~ ~ g; j ~ ~ 1--~- S4 ST/16 sheen test (no sheen) ST/17.5 sheen test (no sheen} organics, trace wood Wet, gray SAND (SP}; fine to medium, wood 2" lense of wet gray silty SAND (SM); Wet, gray, slightly silty SAND (SM); sand is fine § Sampler Type: PIO • Photoionizalion Detector (Headspace Measurement) ~ § No Recovery ~ Stalic Water Level Logged by: RRH g a Continuous Core "Sl-Water Level (ATD) Approved by: JJ P 15 ~ Fi ure No. A · 2 ,L--------------------------------------'-'""'""'-'=-'-'--''-------~ ;;; i ii: "' "' I ~ 0 ~ z !lj Project Name Location Quendall Terminals Renton, WA Driller/Method NW Probe / Push-Probe Sampling Method Continuous Core D,pthl Elevation (feel) 25 30 Borehole Completion Sa""e T"""D S5 r.,., ST/21 sheen test (no sheen) ST/23 sheen test (no sheen) 1.-.1---15r /25 sheen test (no sheen) S6 ST/26 sheen test (no sheen) Project Number 020027 PIO (ppn) Blows/ Material 6" Type Sorin Ground Surface Elev Depth to Water Start/Finish Date DesCliption ·"' Sheet 2 of2 7.5' ATD 7/2112009 8",T (PT); with gray to olive Boring terminated 30 fl. BGS D,pth (fl) 25 35 ot-----'--:--'----'------'L.1---'--------'--...J...-----'--L------------------..L-I § Sampler Type: PID -Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) Logged by: RRH ~ § No Recovery !. Static Water Level ~ 0 Continuous Core n -+ Water Level (ATD) ~ w,'--------------------------------------'F-'i"u"'r"e..:N.::De.;·_.:.A.:...·..:2:.... ______ .J Approved by: JJP Sorin Project Number Sheet 020027 1 of 2 Project Name Quendall Terminals Ground Surface Elev Location ___cR,se"'n.,,to,:.n,_ . .,_W"Ao._ ___________________ _ Driller/Method NW Probe / Push-Probe ;;; ~ ~ ! ~ ~ 0 ~ z Sampling Method Continuous Core 5 10 ~I...._JL_ Sam"' Type/ID S4 Tests :~ sheen test ·,isheen) ST/15 sheen test (no sheen) ST/16.5 sheen test (no sheen) ST/18 sheen lest (no sheen) ST/20 sheen test PIO (ppm) Blows .. Depth to Water 14' ATD Start/Finish Date 7121/2009 Material Descnplion Type Uy moist, brown, sandy SILT (ML); trace lense of moist brown peat at 9.5' -=-e:::= Wet, brown, sandy ORGANIC SILT (OL); ===== Wood from 14'-14.5' Wet, olive gray, slighty silty SAND (SM); sand fine PEAT (PT); with wood Wet, dark, gray SAND (SM); abundant organics and peat, organic silt laminea Wet, brown, to dark brown PEAT (PT); fiberous to non fiberous § Sampler Type: PID -Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) ~ § No Recovery .!. Static Water Level Logged by: RR H g a Continuous Core 'Sl.. Water Level (ATD) Approved by: JJP °'P~ )ft) 5 10 15 ffi Fi ure No. A -2 ,L..--------------------------------------'-=""'-='-...;...'--=--------~ • ~ '" ~ ~ 'i ;;: " ~ lll ii1 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 1'i z w ~ 0 § " z ~ 0 ~ > z w I Project Name Location Quendall Terminals Renton. WA Driller/Method NW Probe f Push-Probe Sampling Method Continuous Core Depth/ B"""°" (feet} Borehole Cornplet!on . ..,,. Type/10 S5 "'" s 19 s een, dissapates quickly Project Number 020027 Ground Surface Elev Depth to Water Start/Finish Date Sheet 2 of2 14' ATD 7121/2009 Depth (ft) 25 ST/25 sheen test ..,. __ _. (no sheen, very 25 S6 30 35 Sampler Type: § No Recovery [] Continuous Core slight odor) Wet. gray SAND {SP); fine to medium f--'--+-------------------1-30 Boring terminated 30 ft BGS 35 PID -Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) .I. Static Water Level Logged by: RRH Approved by: JJP ,;'. Water Level (ATD) Fi ure No. A -2 "' ~ ~ ~ § "' w i ~ 0 ~ Project Name Location Driller/Method Deplh I Elevation {feet) 5 10 ~'L-'-- Quendall Terminals Renton. WA Continuous Core Borehole ~elion Sa"""9 Type/ID S1 ST /2 sheen test (no sheen) L.-.l---l ST 15 sheen test {no sheen) S2 S4 ST/15 sheen test (heavy sheen) ST/19 sheen test (heavy sheen) Project Number 020027 PIO Blows/ Material (pp(n) 6" Type 19 Borin Boring Number QP-5 Ground Surface Elev Depth to Water Start/Finish Date Desoiplion Ao,, Sheet 1 of 2 7.5' ATD 7/21/2009 ·~own, slightly silty to tF, few roots ¥ oist. dark brown, ORGANIC SILT (OL); trace plant fragments Oil coated wood bark in a fine to medium sand matrix 11'-12' Soil sample collected from 11' to 12· BGS'. (Sample ID: QP,5-11-12-S Wet. dark brown PEAT (PT); very thin slit laminea 15'-15.5' interbed of wet SAND (SP); fine to medium, oil stained Peat becomes slightly fiberous Wet, alternating beds of grey, slightly silty SAND (SM); fine to medium; and brown SAND (SP): fine to medium, oil stained § Sampler Type: PIO -Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) i § No Recovery .!. Static Water Level Logged by: RRH Q a Continuous Core ~ Approved by: JJ P Deplh (•) 5 10 15 -Water Level (ATD) !,,_ ____________________________________ _.:..;Fi=u:.:,e;.;N.:O::.·c_.:A..:...-..:2:_ ______ __, ,; ~ "' ~ § ; ~ .. 1; ~ z !'J ~ Aspectco~~::2 Project Name Location Quendall Terminals Renton. WA Driller/Method NW Probe f Push-Probe Sampling Method Continuous Core Depm I Elevation (le,t) 25 30 -· ,,,,.,,o Tests s een es (heavy sheen) ST /21 sheen test (no sheen, trace) ss ST/22.5 sheen test (no sheen) 1-1---1 ST/25.01 sheen test (no sheen) S6 ProJect Number 020027 PIO (ppn) Sio,,,,sl Matertal .. Type Ground Surface Elev Depth to Water StartfFinish Date Description ... Wet, brown, PEAT O?il/J!II" Sheet 2 of 2 7.5' ATD 7/21/2009 Bonng terminated 30 ft BGS, 9' below DNA PL product Depm (ft) 35 ot-----'--'----'----------'----'--~---------'--..L..--'---"-------------------......l--l Logged by: RRH § SamplerType: ~ § No Recovery g a Continuous Core l, w,,_ __________________________________ Fc.:ill.u:::r.:ce.:.N:::o::.. --'AC..:....-_,2=--------' PIO -Photoionization Detector (Headspace Measurement) .Y. Static Water Level 'fl-Waler Level (ATD) Approved by: JJ P WETLAND ASSESSMENT, STANDARD LAKE STUDY, HABITAT DATA REPORT, AND CONCEPTUAL RESTORATION PLAN QUENDALL TERMINALS Prepared for Altino Properties, Inc. and J.H. Baxter & Company Prepared by Anchor QEA, LLC 1423 Third Avenue, Suite 300 Seattle, Washington 98101 November 2009 WETLAND ASSESSMENT, STANDARD LAKE STUDY, HABITAT DATA REPORT, AND CONCEPTUAL RESTORATION PLAN QUENDALL TERMINALS Prepared for Altino Properties, Inc. and J.H. Baxter & Company Prepared by Anchor QEA, LLC 1423 Third Avenue, Suite 300 Seattle, Washington 98101 November 2009 I I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Review of Existing Information ...................................................................................... 2 2 STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 3 2.1 Topography ....................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Soils ................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Hydrology ......................................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Plant Communities and Habitat Types .......................................................................... .5 3 WETLAND DELINEATION .................................................................................................. 7 3.1 Wetland Delineation Methods ........................................................................................ 7 3.1.1 Vegetation ................................................................................................................... 8 3.1.2 Soils ............................................................................................................................. 9 3.1.3 Hydrology ................................................................................................................... 9 3.1.4 Other Data Sources ................................................................................................... 10 3.1.5 Wetland Classifications ............................................................................................ 10 3.1.6 State Wetland Ratings System ................................................................................. 10 3.1.7 City of Renton Wetland Rating System and Buffer Requirements ....................... 12 3.1.7.1 Wetland Rating System and BufferRequirements ........................................ 12 3.1.8 Wetland Functions Assessment ............................................................................... 14 3.2 Wetland Delineation Results ......................................................................................... 14 3.2.1 Wetland A ................................................................................................................. 14 3.2.2 Wetland B ................................................................................................................. 16 3.2.3 3.2.4 3.2.5 3.2.6 3.2.7 3.2.8 3.2.9 3.2.10 Wetland C ................................................................................................................. 17 Wetland D ................................................................................................................. 18 Wetland E ................................................................................................................. 20 Wetland F ................................................................................................................. 21 Wetland G ................................................................................................................. 22 Wetland H ................................................................................................................ 24 Wetland I .................................................................................................................. 25 Wetland J .................................................................................................................. 26 3.3 Regulatory Framework .................................................................................................. 28 3.3.1 USFWS Classification ............................................................................................... 28 Wetland Assessment, Standard Lake Study, and Habitat Data Report Qµendall Tenninals i November 2009 060059-01 3.3.2 Ecology Rating, Classification, and Functions and Values Scores ......................... 28 3.3.3 City of Renton Wetland Classification Guidance ................................................... 31 3.4 Wetland Functions and Values Summary .................................................................... 31 3.4.1 Water Quality Functions ......................................................................................... 33 3.4.2 Hydrologic Functions ............................................................................................... 33 3.4.3 Habitat Functions ..................................................................................................... 34 3.5 Exempt Wetlands ........................................................................................................... 35 3.6 Constructed Storrnwater Features ................................................................................. 35 3.6.1 Excavated Features from the 1970s ......................................................................... 35 3.6.2 Best Management Practices Implementation -2006 ............................................. 36 3.6.3 Anticipated Regulatory Status ................................................................................. 36 3.7 Wetland Delineation and Typing Limitations .............................................................. 37 4 LAKE WASHINGTON OHWM DELINEATION AND LAKE STUDY ............................. 38 4.1 Lake Washington OHWM Delineation Methods ........................................................ 38 4.2 Lake Washington OHWM Delineation Results ........................................................... 39 4.3 Lake Study ...................................................................................................................... 39 4.3.1 Fish Species Presence .............................................................................................. .40 5 SHORELINE RESTORATION PLAN .................................................................................. 41 5.1 Introduction and Purpose .............................................................................................. 41 5.2 Goals and Objectives ...................................................................................................... 42 5.3 Elements of the Plan ..................................................................................................... .43 5.3.1 Riparian Buffer Habitat ........................................................................................... .43 5.3.2 Wetland Restoration ................................................................................................ 44 6 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................... 47 Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qpendall Tenninals ii November 2009 06()(J59-0J List of Tables Table l Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Wetland Plant Indicator Definitions ................................................................... 9 City of Renton Wetland Regulations ................................................................. 14 USFWS Wetland Classifications and Connections to Surface Water .............. 28 Summary of Wetland Classes and Rating Scores Using Ecology Wetlands Rating System ....................................................................................................... 29 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7 Table 8 Summary of Functions and Values Wetland Rating Scores ............................. 30 City of Renton Wetland Ratings and Standard Buffer Distance ...................... 31 Riparian Buffer Plant List ................................................................................... 44 Wetland Plant List .............................................................................................. 46 List of Figures Figure l Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Vicinity Map Project Site and Aerial Photo Site Topography Soil Series NWI Mapped Wetlands Vegetative Cover Wetlands and OHWM Delineation Results Shoreline Restoration Conceptual Design List of Appendices Appendix A Plan View and Cross Sections of Wetlands A through H Appendix B Ordinary High Water Mark Flag Locations Appendix C Sample Plot Summary Data Appendix D Field Data Sheets Appendix E Ecology Wetland Rating Forms Appendix F Site Photographs Appendix G Mitigation Analysis Memorandum, Quendall and Baxter Properties Appendix H 1990 Aerial Photograph Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qµendall Terminals iii November 2009 060059-01 Introduction 1 INTRODUCTION From April to June 2009, Anchor QEA, LLC (Anchor QEA) performed wetland delineation, lake ordinary high water mark (OHWM) delineation, and habitat assessments of the approximately 21-acre Quendall Terminals Site (Site) in Renton, Washington (Parcel No. 2924059002; Township 24 North, Range 5 East, Section 29). A vicinity map is provided on Figure 1, and a recent aerial photograph of the project area is provided on Figure 2. The survey included an approximately 1.15-acre adjoining portion on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard (Figure 2). This report is intended to support City of Renton (City) entitlement processing for Master Siteplan Approval, Shoreline Substantial Development, Environmental Review, and a Binding Siteplan, for the Quendall Terminals property. The redevelopment project anticipates submittal of a checklist with the intent of securing a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS) under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The proposed project includes a mix of 5-story residential units above two levels of above-grade parking and at-grade surface street parking along with retail/restaurant space. The redevelopment project anticipates entitlement of approximately 800 residential units, 260,000± square feet of office space, and 30,000± square feet (st) of retail/restaurant space with associated parking. Under the direction of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Quendall Terminals owners {Altino Properties, Inc., and J.H. Baxter & Company) are concurrently conducting a remedial investigation (RI) and feasibility study (FS) at the Site. The work is being conducted under an Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent, as amended (AOC), with EPA under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA; i.e., "Superfund"). Detailed information on existing lake and upland conditions will be included in the RI, anticipated to be completed in summer 2010. CERCLA cleanup actions along the shoreline will likely include remediation of hazardous substances in lake sediments and/or in the upland portions of the Site. While this report was prepared in accordance with City criteria, as defined in the City of Renton Municipal Code (RMC) Section 4-3-050 (City of Renton 2009), some elements required by the code will not be available until selection of a cleanup remedy for the Site by EPA, which is currently anticipated in early 2011. As required by CERCLA, all substantive provisions of City regulatory requirements will be met by the cleanup remedy selected by EPA. Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qµendall Tenninals 1 November 2009 06()()59-01 Introduction Land use within the study area is currently zoned for commercial use and consists of abandoned log storage facilities, modified dirt roads, and fragmented patches of forest and shrub habitat. Ten wetlands (Wetlands A through J) were identified within the study area. This report describes the methods used in the field investigation and Anchor QEA's findings. A description of the study area is included in Section 2. Summaries of the findings of the wetland delineation are included in Section 3. Summaries of the findings of the lake OHWM delineation are included in Section 4. Drawings showing plan view and cross sections of each wetland are provided in Appendix A. Flag locations from the OHWM survey are provided in drawings in Appendix B. A summary of data collected at each sample plot during the wetland delineation is presented in tables in Appendix C and in the field data forms in Appendix D. Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) wetland rating forms are included in Appendix E. Site photographs are provided in Appendix F. Previous wetland delineations performed in 1997 are included in the Mitigation Analysis Memorandum provided in Appendix G. A 1990 aerial photograph of the site is provided in AppendixH. 1.1 Review of Existing Information As part of the analysis to identify natural resources and critical areas in the study area, Anchor QEA ecologists reviewed the following sources of information to support field observations: • Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey (USDA 2009) • Soil Survey of King County, Washington (USDA 1973) • Hydric Soil List for King County, Washington (USDA 2001) • United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Wetlands Mapper for National Wetlands Inventory (NW!) Map Information (USFWS 2009) • RMC (City of Renton 2009) • Aerial photographs • Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Priority Habitat and Species (PHS) Maps (WDFW 2009) • WDFS Non-game Data System Special Animal Species, as identified in Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 232-12-011 · Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark Dehneation Report Qpendall Terminals 2 November 2009 06(}()59-01 Study Area Description 2 STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION The study area consists of one parcel with two parts. The larger portion is rectangular- shaped and is approximately 20.08 acres located adjacent to Lake Washington. The smaller portion is located just across Lake Washington Boulevard and is approximately 1.15 acres. The study area is located in the City of Renton, King County Washington (Township 24 North, Range 5 East, Section 29; see Figures 1 and 2). Shortly after the lowering of Lake Washington in 1916 to construct the Lake Washington Ship Canal, the Site, including newly exposed portions of the former May Creek delta, was developed into a creosote manufacturing facility. Up until 1969, creosote was manufactured on the Site by refining and processing coal tar and oil-gas tar residues. From 1969 to approximately 1977, some of the aboveground tanks at the Site were used intermittently for crude oil, waste oil, and diesel storage. From 1977 to 2008, the Site was used primarily for log sorting and storage, with tree, shrub, and herbaceous vegetation associated with upland, wetland, and riparian habitats. The Site is currently vacant. Aquatic lands adjacent to the facility managed by the Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) were historically leased for log rafting and vessel storage uses, but those leases terminated in the 1990s. Immediately adjacent properties include Conner Homes to the south (former Barbee Mill property) and Port Quendall Company/Football Northwest to the north (former J.H. Baxter property). Lake Washington borders the western boundary of the study area. BNSF railroad and Lake Washington Boulevard separate the two portions of the parcel, with Interstate 405 (I-405) located along the east side of the eastern portion. May Creek currently discharges into Lake Washington approximately 400 yards south of the Site, just south of the Conner Homes development. An aerial photograph of the study area shortly after redevelopment of the Port Quendall Company/Football Northwest property, but prior to more recent redevelopment of the Conner Homes property, is depicted on Figure 2. 2.1 Topography Overall, the topography of the Site is relatively level with a gradual slope west down to Lake Washington (Figure 3). Site topography has been modified over the past 90 years by filling and grading activities. Site elevations are based on the North American Vertical Datum 1988 Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report QpendaU Tenninals 3 November 2009 060059-01 Sludy Area Description (NA VD 88) and range from approximately 35 feet on the east side of the property to about 20 feet at the lake shore. The exposed Site soils are relatively fine-grained, which slows infiltration during rainy periods causing ponding in many areas. The Site has been heavily manipulated through the placement of fill, which is found across the entire Site. Fill thickness ranges from 1 to 2 feet along the southern and eastern boundaries up to 6 and 10 feet in northern portions. Most commonly, the fill is a mix of silt, sand, and gravel with wood debris. Wood chips and bark from the log sorting operations are typical in the upper few feet. Where creosote and pitch-like material has been encountered, it generally occurred at depths greater than 2 feet below ground surface. The surface of the Site is currently covered by either wood debris or by a 0.25-to 1-foot- thick layer of rock and organic muck generated from imported gravel and wood debris mixed together by operation oflog sorting equipment in wet areas. There is also a network of roads at the Site that were previously used for log sorting and storage, resulting in relatively compacted soil on much of the Site. Additionally, several stormwater features have been constructed on the Site that appear to have historically collected and conveyed much of the site's stormwater into Lake Washington. During the rainy season, most runoff flows into stormwater collection ponds on the west side of the Site or a drainage ditch along the southern property boundary (Figure 3). Stormwater also accumulates in low-lying areas. During field surveys it was apparent that these features still function by conveying and storing seasonal stormwater. Several features were excavated, constructed, or improved in 2006 to limit stormwater runoff into Lake Washington (Phoinix 2006). These areas have developed wetland characteristics supporting riparian tree species like willows (Salixsp.) and black cottonwoods (Papulus balsamifera). 2.2 Soils The NRCS Web Sail Survey (USDA 2009) identifies two soil series in the location of the study area: "Nonna sandy loam (No)" and "Bellingham silt loam (Bh)." The Nonna sandy loam series is mapped within the majority of the study area, and the Bellingham silt loam series is mapped along the northern portion. Figure 4 shows soil series in the study area. Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qpendall Terminals 4 November 2009 060059-01 Study Area Description Both soil series identified in the study area are described as having poorly drained soils that formed in alluvium, under sedges, grass, conifers, and hardwoods. The Norma series are in basins on the glaciated uplands and in areas along the stream bottoms. The Bellingham series are nearly level and are mostly in depressions on the upland glacial till plain (USDA 1973). According to the Hydric Soil List for King County, Washington, both the Norma sandy loam and Bellingham series are classified as hydric soils (USDA 2009). Sample plot soil profiles are described in Section 3.2. A summary of soils data collected at each sample plot is presented in tables in Appendix C and in the field data forms in Appendix D. 2.3 Hydrology The study area is located in the Lake Washington/Sammamish River Basin Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 8 (Ecology 2009a). Hydrologic characteristics in the study area are influenced by regional groundwater, direct precipitation, surface water runoff, and Lake Washington. The OHWM of Lake Washington was delineated as part of this investigation and is described in Section 4 of this report. Sample plot hydrology is described in Section 3.2. A summary of hydrology data collected at each sample plot is presented in tables in Appendix C and in the field data forms in Appendix D. 2.4 Plant Communities and Habitat Types The USFWS Wetlands Mapper for NWJ Map Information identifies palustrine scrub-shrub (PSS) habitat on the western border of the study area adjoining Lake Washington (USFWS 2009; Figure 5). Wetland vegetation community types identified during the delineation include palustrine and lacustrine emergent (PEM and LEM), palustrine and lacustrine scrub shrub (PSS and LSS), palustrine and lacustrine forested (PFO and LFO), and palustrine open water (POW) wetland systems. Vegetation within the study area includes tree, shrub, grass, and herbaceous species associated with upland, wetland, and riparian habitat associated with Lake Washington and the constructed stormwater features. Vegetative cover by community (forested, scrub/shrub, and herbaceous/disturbed) and trees more than 10 inches in diameter at breast height (dbh) within 100 feet of the shoreline are shown on Figure 6. Wetland and Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Quendall Terminals 5 November 2009 060059-01 Study Area Description upland vegetation in the study area is described in Section 3.2. A summary of vegetation data collected in the study area and at each sample plot is presented in the tables in Appendix C and in the field data forms in Appendix D. The WDFW PHS database does not identify any priority habitats within the study area (WDFW 2009). Priority wetland habitat occurs approximately 0.25-mile south and east of the study area and consists of scrub-shrub, forested, and emergent marsh wetlands along May Creek, its tributaries, and Lake Boren. Priority fish presence documented in May Creek includes coho salmon ( Oncorhynchus kisutch), fall Chinook salmon ( Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), resident cutthroat ( Oncorhynchus darki), sockeye salmon ( Oncorhynchus nerka), and winter steelhead ( Oncorhynchus mykiss). Priority fish presence within the study area includes species documented in Lake Washington, including coho salmon, fall Chinook, resident cutthroat, sockeye salmon, winter steelhead, and Dolly Varden/bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus). Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineadon Report Quendall Terminals 6 November 2009 06()()59-01 Wetland Delineation 3 WETLAND DELINEATION On April 23 and 30, May 6, and June 19 2009, Anchor QEA ecologists performed wetland delineations and a wetland ratings analysis of wetland habitats in the study area. Ten wetlands, Wetlands A and J, were found in the study area. Complete descriptions of Wetlands A through J are provided in the following sections. Wetland delineation results are shown on Figure 6 -Wetland and OHWM Delineation Results. A summary of vegetation, soils, and hydrology data collected at each sampling plot is presented in the tables in Appendix C and in the field data forms in Appendix D. Site photographs are provided in AppendixF. 3.1 Wetland Delineation Methods This section describes the methodology used to perform the wetland delineation, including the review of existing information and field investigation procedures. These methods are consistent with current federal and state agency requirements, as well as local jurisdiction requirements, for performing wetland delineations and identifying protective wetland buffer widths. As specified by the RMC (City of Renton 2009), this wetland delineation was conducted according to the methods defined in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987), the Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Westem Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Corps 2008), and Ecology's Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual (Ecology 1997). Soil colors were classified by their numerical description, as identified on a Munsell Soil Color Chart (Munsell 1994). The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps; Environmental Laboratory 1987), the Washington State Shoreline Management Act (SMA; Ecology 2009b), the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA; Access Washington 2007), and the RMC all define wetlands as: "Areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas." Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qµendall Tenninals 7 November 2009 060059-0 I Wetland Delineation The method for delineating wetlands is based on the presence of three parameters: hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. Hydrophytic vegetation is "the macrophytic plant life that occurs in areas where the frequency and duration of inundation or soil saturation produce permanently or periodically saturated soils of sufficient duration to exert a controlling influence on the plant species present." H ydric soils are "formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part." Wetland hydrology "encompasses all hydrologic characteristics of areas that are periodically inundated or have soils saturated to the surface for a sufficient duration during the growing season" (Ecology 1997). Data collection methods for each of these parameters are described below. A total of 21 data plots were sampled at the approximately 21.23-acre study area. Sample plots are identified numerically as wetland or upland plots (for example, SPl Wet, SP2Wet, SP3Up, etc). Vegetation, soils, and hydrology information were collected at each of the plots, recorded on field data sheets, and photographed. Locations of wetland delineation boundary flags and data plots are provided in Appendix A. A summary of sample plot data is presented in Appendix C. The field data sheets are provided in Appendix D. Site photographs are provided in Appendix F. Wetland boundaries were determined based upon sample plot data and visual observations of each wetland. Wetland locations and boundaries were flagged and subsequently surveyed by a professional surveyor to establish and verify the location and size. 3.1.1 Vegetation Plant species occurring in each plot were recorded on field data sheets, one data sheet per plot (Appendix D). Percent cover was estimated in the plot for each plant species and dominant species were determined. At each plot, trees within a 30-foot radius, shrubs within a 15-foot radius, and emergents within a 3-foot radius from the center of the plot were identified and recorded on a data sheet. A plant indicator status, designated by the USFWS (Reed 1988 and 1993), was assigned to each species and a determination was made as to whether the vegetation in the plot was hydrophytic. To meet the hydrophytic parameter, more than 50 percent of the dominant species, with 20 percent or greater cover, must have an indicator of obligate wetland (OBL), facultative wetland (F ACW), or facultative (FAC or F AC+). Table 1 shows the wetland indicator status categories. Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark DeHneation Report Qµendall Terminals 8 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation Table 1 Wetland Plant Indicator Definitions Indicator Status Description Obligate wetland (DBL) Plant species occur almost always in wetlands (estimated probability greater than 99 percent) under natural conditions. Facultative wetland Plant species usually occur in wetlands (estimated probability 67 (FACW) percent to 99 percent), but occasionally found in non-wetlands. Facultative (FAC) Plant species equally likely to occur in wetlands or non-wetlands (estimated probability 34 percent to 66 percent). Facultative upland Plant species usually occur in non-wetlands (estimated probability (FACU) 67 percent to 99 percent), but occasionally found in wetlands. Obligate upland (UPL) Plant species occur almost always in non-wetlands (estimated probability greater than 99 percent) under natural conditions. 3.1.2 Soils Soils were sampled in each plot and evaluated for hydric soil indicators. Soil pits were dug to a depth of 16 inches or greater, and all profiles were photographed. Hydric soil indicators include low soil matrix chroma, gleying, and redoximorphic features (such as mottles), and are formed predominantly by the accumulation or loss of iron, manganese, sulfur, or carbon compounds in a saturated and anaerobic environment. Mottles are spots of contrasting color occurring within the soil matrix (the predominant soil color). Gleyed soils are predominantly bluish, greenish, or grayish in color. For example, a depleted dark soil surface (F7), a matrix value of 3 or less, a chroma of 2 or less, and 20 percent or more redox depletions are positive indicators of hydric soils (Corps 2008). Due to the presence of known soil and groundwater contamination at the Site, soil pits were not excavated at many wetland sample plots located in the upland area. This includes the constructed stormwater features located throughout the project site and most upland plot locations. 3.1.3 Hydrology Wetland hydrology was evaluated at each plot to determine whether it "encompasses all hydrologic characteristics of areas that are periodically inundated or have soils saturated to Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qµendall Terminals 9 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation the surface for a sufficient duration during the growing season" (Ecology 1997). The mesic growing season in western Washington is generally March through October. Field observations of saturation and inundation, and other indicators of wetland hydrology, such as water-stained leaves and drainage patterns in wetlands, were recorded. 3.1.4 Other Data Sources Reviews of existing information were conducted to identify potential wetlands or site characteristics indicative of wetlands in the study area. The sources of information reviewed to support field observations are identified in Section 1.1. 3.1.5 Wetland Classifications Wetland community types are discussed below according to the USFWS classification developed by Cowardin, et al. (1979). This system, published in 1979 by a team ofUSFWS scientists led by L.M. Cowardin, bases the classification of wetlands on their physical characteristics, such as the general type of vegetation in the wetland (trees, shrubs, grass, etc.) and prevalence and location of water in the wetland. The Cowardin classification system provides a classification for every known wetland type that occurs throughout the United States, and, under this system, a wetland can be classified as having one or more wetland classification types. The community types found during this investigation were: • Palustrine and Lacustrine forested (PFO and LFO) -These wetlands have at least 30 percent cover of woody vegetation that is more than 20 feet high. • Palustrine and Lacustrine scrub-shrub (PSS and LSS) -These wetlands have at least 30 percent cover of woody vegetation that is less than 20 feet high. • Palustrine and Lacustrine emergent (PEM and LEM) -These wetlands have erect, rooted, herbaceous vegetation present for most of the growing season in most years. • Palustrine open water (POW) -These wetlands are characterized by open water, such as ponds. 3.1.6 State Wetland Ratings System At the state level, wetlands are categorized by applying the most current version of the rating system developed by Ecology: Washington State Wedands Rating System -Westem Washington: Revised (Ecology 2004), and Washington State Wedand Rating Form - Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mack Delineation Repon Quendall Terminals 10 November 2009 060059-01 ,Mfla) [cr1oo,' developed this system to stern Washington, version 2(Ecology LWOJ, i , . J1iflc1nce in the erenriate wetlands based on their sensitivity to disturbance, th1:11r sf gu. I tershed, their rarity, the ability to replace them, and the beneficial functions they prov;de society. ·o determine an accurate assessment of a wetland' s rating and functional values, function ;cores were calculated based on entire wetland systems, not just the delineated portion of wetlands within the study area. The Ecology rating system requires the user to collect specific information about the wetland in a step-by-step process. AB part of the rating system, the hydrogeomorphic classification of the wetland was determined and three major functions were analyzed: flood and erosion control, water quality improvement, and wildlife habitat. Each hydrogeomorphic wetland class has specific rating criteria for water quality and hydrologic functions. Habitat functions rating criteria were the same for each of the hydrogeomorphic wetland classes. Ratings were based on a point system where points are given if a wetland meets specific criteria related to the wetland's potential and opportunity to provide certain benefits. If a wetland provides the opportunity to improve water quality or hydrologic functions, a multiplier of two was applied to the points for the wetland's potential functions. If a wetland does not provide the opportunity to improve water quality or hydrologic functions, a multiplier of one was applied. Per Ecology's rating system, wetlands were categorized according to the following criteria and on points given: • Category I wetlands (70 to 100 points) represent a unique or rare wetland type, or are more sensitive to disturbance, or are relatively undisturbed and contain ecological attributes that are impossible to replace within a human lifetime. • Category II wetlands (51 to 69 points) are difficult, though not impossible, to replace, and provide high levels of some functions. • Category III (30 to 50 points) wetlands have a moderate level of function. They have been disturbed in some ways, and are often less diverse or more isolated from other natural resources in the landscape than Category II wetlands. • Category IV wetlands (0 to 29 points) have the lowest levels of functions and are often heavily disturbed. Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qp1.endall Terminals 11 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Del 3.1.7 City of Renton Wetland Rating System and Buffer Requirements Wetlands in the study area were also rated according to the City of Renton Critical Are. Regulations that establish local regulatory requirements for wetlands and their associate( buffers (City of Renton 2009). Wetlands in the study area were assigned a local rating category based on the applicable City and King County (County) critical areas regulations and the associated regulatory wetland buffer widths. Section 3.3.3 provides wetland information contained in the RMC (City of Renton 2009). The full text of the city's critical areas regulations was consulted during this analysis. 3.1.7.1 Wetland Rating System and Buffer Requirements Category 1 wetlands meet any of the following criteria: • Contain species listed by federal or state government as endangered or threatened, or the presence of essential habitat for those species • Have 40 to 60 percent permanent open water (in dispersed patches or otherwise) with two or more vegetation classes • Are equal to or greater than 10 acres in size and have three or more vegetation classes, one of which is open water • Contain plant associations of infrequent occurrence, or at the geographical limits of their occurrence Category 2 wetlands meet any of the following criteria: • Are wetlands that are not Category 1 or 3 wetlands • Have heron rookeries or raptor nesting trees, but are not Category 1 wetlands • Are wetlands of any size located at the headwaters of a watercourse, i.e., a wetland with a perennial or seasonal outflow channel, but with no defined influent channel, but are not Category 1 wetlands • Have minimum existing evidence of human related physical alteration such as diking, ditching, or channelization Category 3 wetlands meet any of the following criteria: • Are severely disturbed wetlands; severely disturbed wetlands are wetlands that meet Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qµendall Tenninals 12 November 2009 ,.,.,... .. - W ctland De1ineauuu the following aiteria: Are characterized by hydrologic isolation, human-related hyJr~lagit 1J[ef4l/Olli such as diking, ditching, channelization, and/or outlet modification Have soils alterations such as the presence of fill, soil removal and/or compaction of soil May have altered vegetation • Are newly emerging wetlands; newly emerging wetlands are wetlands occurring on top of fill materials, and characterized by emergent vegetation, low plant species richness, and used minimally by wildlife. • Include all other wetlands not classified as Category 1 or 2, such as smaller, high quality wetlands. According to the RMC, Category 3 wetlands less than 2,200 sf in area are exempt from the regulations if they meet the following exemption criteria[ 4-3-050 CS(f)]: • Standing water is not present in sufficient amounts, i.e., approximately 12 inches to 18 inches in depth from approximately December through May, to support breeding amphibians • Species listed by Federal or State government as endangered or threatened, or the presence of essential habitat for those species, are not present • Some form of mitigation is provided for hydro logic and water quality functions; for example, stormwater treatment or landscaping or other mitigation • A wetland assessment is prepared by a qualified professional demonstrating the criteria of the exemption are met According to the RMC Title 4, Chapter 3, Section 5, wetland buffers are measured from the wetland edge as delineated in the field and are sized depending on the wetland category. Building or activity setback from a critical area or buffer may be required to ensure adequate protection of the critical area/buffer during construction and ongoing maintenance of the activity. Section 5 also states that alterations to wetlands shall be mitigated through creation, restoration, and/or enhancement. Mitigation actions must re-create as nearly as possible the wetland being replaced, and result in no net loss of wetland acreage and/or function. Table 2 provides a summary of the City's wetland buffer requirements. Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark DeHneation Report Qpendall Terminals 13 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation Table 2 City of Renton Wetland Regulations Wetland Classification Buffer Requirement Category 1 100 feet Category 2 50 feet Category 3 25 feet 3.1.8 Wetland Functions Assessment The functional values of wetlands were rated according to Washington State Wedand Rating System -Western Washington: Revised (Ecology 2004) and Wedand Rating Form -Western Washington, Version 2 (Ecology 2006). Using Ecology's system, wetlands were rated based on a point system where points are awarded to three functional value categories: water quality, hydrologic, and wildlife habitat. Detailed scoring, based on Ecology wetland rating forms, is provided in Appendix E. 3.2 Wetland Delineation Results Ten wetlands, Wetlands A though J, were found in the study area. A complete description of each wetland is provided in the following sections. Wetland delineation results are shown on Figure 5 and for each individual wetland in Appendix A. A summary of vegetation, soils, and hydrology data collected at each sample plot is presented in the tables in Appendix C and in the field data forms in Appendix D. 3.2.1 Wetland A Wetland A is a 0.08-acre (3,433-sf) lake-fringe and slope wetland that contains LFO, LSS, and LEM habitat (Figure 7; Appendix A). The entire boundary of Wetland A was delineated within the study area. Wetland A is located in the southwest comer of the study area and is associated with Lake Washington (Photographs 1 and 2 in Appendix F). A compacted dirt access road abuts the eastern edge. Wetland A vegetation is dominated primarily by young (less than 10 inches dbh) red alder (Alnus rubra), red-osier dogwood ( Comus sericea), and black twinberry (Lonicera involucrata) (Photograph 2 in Appendix F). The dominant buffer vegetation of Wetland A is Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark DeHneation Report Qµendall Tenninals 14 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation also young red alder with some Indian plum ( Oemleria cerasiformis) and dense Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) where the vegetated buffer transitions into a compacted soil road. Much (75 percent) of the buffer is disturbed compacted soils with sparse native and non-native invasive plants. The northwest perimeter of Wetland A is Lake Washington with extensive open and deep water habitats. Wildlife use of the wetland and its buffer was evident through several physical indicators such as woodpecker cavities, forage snags, beaver forage marks, and mammal tunnels in the dense vegetation. There was evidence of turtle and waterfowl use on the partially submerged woody debris at the edge of the wetland bordering the lake. Wildlife observed in the wetland and its buffer includes black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus), song sparrow (Melospiza melodia), Bushtit (Psaltriparus minimus), and Anna's hummingbird ( Calypte anna). The transition from an open water habitat to wetland to maintained upland offers both soft and hard edges between habitats. Movement of wildlife from the wetland habitat to the lake or from the lake to the wetland appears healthy and may offer migration, forage, shelter, and breeding opportunities for specific species of amphibians, waterfowl, and mammals. The transition from the upland buffer habitats to the wetland habitat offers a more abrupt transition to wildlife. Hard edges tend to benefit some species while creating a less beneficial habitat for others. Migration, forage, shelter, and breeding near or in these areas may be limited for many species. Soils in the wetland plot included very dark gray (lOYR 3/1) to very dark grayish-brown (lOYR 3/2) day loam to 18 inches deep. Below about 18 inches, very dark gray (2.SY 3/1) clay loam with dark yellowish brown (lOYR 3/4) mottles was observed in the matrix. Soils in the upland plot were very dark gray (lOYR 3/1) to 18+ inches with brown (lOYR 4/3) mottles observed around 8+ inches, Soil saturation was at the surface in the majority of Wetland A and the upland plot, with free-standing water in the sample plots within about 10 inches of the surface. Two sample plots were established as part of Wetland A: SPl Wet and SP! Up (Appendices A and B). SPl Wet contained indicators of hydrophytic vegetation, wetland hydrology, and hydric soils. The upland plot, SPlUp, had indicators of wetland hydrology and hydric soils, Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qpendall Terminals 15 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation but lacked hydrophytic vegetation. Twenty flags were used to identify the Wetland A boundary (Appendix A). 3.2.2 WetlandB Wetland Bis an approximately 0.14-acre (6,051-sf) depressional wetland and is one of the largest constructed storm water features in the study area displaying wetland characteristics (Figure 7; Appendix A). Wetland B was excavated in the 1970s as a retention pond to control tar from flowing into the lake (King County Metro 1972). The wetland is triangle-shaped and representative of a settling pond with standing water observed during the survey. The eastern boundary of Wetland B narrows to a ditch-like feature that possibly used to convey water west from Wetland G during large rain events through either a culvert or a shallow ditch (now abandoned). Wetland B is positioned in the landscape approximately 6 to 8 feet below Wetland C. Wetland B contains PSS and POW habitats (Photograph 2 in Appendix F). As part of an effort to prevent silt and wood debris from entering Lake Washington in 2006, an outfall was excavated along the north side of Wetland B to create a stable outlet for stormwater into Lake Washington. Wetland vegetation is dominated by fapanese knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum), Pacific willow (Salix lasiandra), soft rush (Juncus effiJsus), and purple-leaved willowherb (Epilobium ciliatum). Dominant buffer vegetation of Wetland B includes monotypic stands of Japanese knotweed and Himalayan blackberry. Most (90 percent) of the buffer apparently was maintained until recently. These maintained areas have now become fully vegetated, with fapanese knotweed dominating the western buffer and Himalayan blackberry dominating the eastern buffer. The remaining buffer ( 10 percent) on the north and south ends of the wetland has a few large native trees (greater than 16 inches dbh), but the understory is a shrub layer dominated by non-native invasive plants. The western buffer extends to Lake Washington with extensive open and deep water habitats. Wildlife use of Wetland B and its buffer was not very evident, but there were a few physical indicators such as a beaver slide to the west from the wetland toward the lake, and other small mammal tunnels in the dense vegetation. There was evidence of turtle use on the partially submerged woody debris within the standing water of the wetland. No aquatic organisms were seen in the water other than the purple-leaved willow herb. Wildlife observed in the wetland and its buffer includes spotted towhee (Pipilo maculatus), song Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Quendall Tenninals 16 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation sparrow, and American goldfinch ( Carduelis tristis). The open water habitat within the wetland quickly transitions to a scrub-shrub buffer habitat. Movement of wildlife from the wetland habitat to the buffer or from the buffer to the wetland appears to offer migration, forage, shelter, and breeding opportunities for specific species of amphibians, waterfowl, and mammals. Similarly, the transition from the wetland to the buffer to the lake offers a greater migration route with the dense shrub cover between the two open water habitats. Wetland B (denoted as Quendall Pond in the CERCLA Rl/FS documents) is known to contain relatively high concentrations of contaminants in soil and groundwater, which limit the quality, use, and function of these habitats and corridors. Because contaminants are known to be in the study area, soil pits were not excavated in Wetland B. Wetland B is the largest of the constructed stormwater features in the srudy area. As described above, during large rain events, Wetland G may convey stormwater through a relic connection or by surface flow. The depth of water in Wetland B was not discemable because of opaque water coloration and the presence of contamination preventing further investigation; however, the volume and depth did appear to exceed several feet. Two sample plots were established as part of Wetland B: SPIWet and SPIUp (Appendices A, C, and D). The wetland plot contained indicators ofhydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology. The upland plot lacked indicators of wetland hydrology and hydrophytic vegetation. Eleven flags were used to identify the Wetland B boundary (Appendix A). 3.2.3 WetlandC Wetland C is an approximately 0.03-acre (1,200 sf) depressional wetland and is another constructed stormwater feature in the study area displaying wetland characteristics (Figure 7; Appendix A). The wetland is located in the center of the parcel with the western boundary approximately 38 feet from Lake Washington. Like Wetland B, the wetland is representative of a stormwater pond with standing water observed during the survey. Wetland C is positioned in the landscape approximately 6 to 8 feet above Wetland B. The entirety of Wetland C was constructed in 2006 as part of an effort to prevent silt and wood debris from entering Lake Washington (Phoinix 2006). An earthen berm was constructed along the Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Quendall Ternunals 17 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation south west edge of Wetlands B and C, and check dams were installed to control turbid water and floating debris. Wetland C likely flows directly into Wetland B during high flow events via sheetflow (Figure 7; Photograph 3 in Appendix F). Wetland C was constructed in an upland area that did not contain wetland indicators, based on the fact that Wetland C was not identified during a wetland delineation conducted by David Evans and Associates in 1997 (Appendix G). Wetland C contains PFO, PSS, PEM, and POW habitats. At the time of the survey, Pacific willow and black cottonwood saplings were the only vegetation observed in Wetland B and distributed along the wetland's edge. The saplings were all 3 to 5 feet in height with a dbh of approximately 1 to 3 inches. Because of the recent construction and maintenance of this feature, the wetland habitat and buffer habitat are heavily degraded and offer little or no opportunity for wildlife use. Because contaminants are known to be in the study area, soil pits were not excavated in Wetland C. The wetland is oval-shaped and, as described above, resembles a small settling pond. The wetland primarily receives stormwater runoff from the study area and direct precipitation. During the survey, based only on visual approximations, the depth of standing water was about 10 to 12 inches in the deepest parts. Two sample plots were established as part of Wetland C: SPlWet and SPlUp (Appendices A, C, and D). The wetland plot contained indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology. The upland plot lacked indicators of wetland hydrology and hydrophytic vegetation. Soil pits were not excavated. Ten flags were used to identify the Wetland C boundary (Appendix A). 3.2.4 WetlandD Wetland Dis a 0.38-acre (16,686-sf) lake-fringe and slope wetland that contains LFO, ISS, and LEM habitats (Figure 7; Appendix A). Wetland Dis associated with Lake Washington (Photograph 4 in Appendix F) and extends approximately 170 feet into the study area. Wetland D is the only wetland in the study area included in the USFWS Wedands Mapper Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qµendall Tenninals 18 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation for NW! Map Information (Figure 5), which identifies this as PSS habitat. Wetland vegetation is dominated by large black cottonwood, Pacific willow, red alder, and red-osier dogwood. The dominant buffer vegetation includes black cottonwood and Himalayan blackberry and is the most diverse in vegetative strata layers (canopy, sub-canopy, scrub- shrub, and herbaceous) and the most intact of all the project site wetland buffers. Approximately 40 percent of the wetland buffer is Lake Washington to the northwest. Wildlife use of Wetland D is very similar to but more diverse than Wetland A. Several physical wildlife indicators within the wetland and the buffer were observed: woodpecker cavities, stick nests, basket nests, mole mounds, soil burrows, forage snags, beaver forage marks, matted vegetation, and mammal tunnels in the dense vegetation. There was also evidence of turtle and waterfowl use on partially submerged woody debris and vegetative mats at the edge of the lake and within the wetland. Wildlife observed in the wetland and its buffer includes Black-capped chickadee, song sparrow, bushtit, spotted towhee, downy woodpecker (Picoides pubescens), brown creeper ( Certhia amen·cana), American robin ( Turdus migratrious), and northwest crow ( Corvus caurinus). The transition from the open water habitat to the wetland to an intact upland buffer offers soft edges between all habitats. Movement of wildlife from the buffer to the wetland to the lake, or back, may offer healthy migration, forage, shelter, and breeding opportunities for specific species of amphibians, waterfowl, and mammals. This wetland, along with its buffer, appears to offer the best habitat opportunity for the most species due to its size, vegetative structure, hydrology regimes, and position in the landscape. Three soil pits were excavated in Wetland D (Appendix A); one near the lake's edge (SPlWet), one in the upland (SPlUp), and one in the uppermost extent of the wetland (SP2Wet). The soils in SPlWet included very dark grayish-brown (lOYR 3/2) sandy loam to 6 inches deep and then gray (lOYR 5/1) silt loam with dark yellowish brown (lOYR 4/6) mottles through 18+ inches. Soils in SP2Wet included black (lOYR 2/1) loamy sand through 10 inches and then dark gray (2.SY 4/1) loamy sand through 18+ inches. At approximately 10 to 12 inches, a narrow band of dark gray (2.SYR 4/1) silt loam with dark yellowish-brown (lOYR 4/6) mottles was observed with interspersed coarse angular rock. SPl Up included grayish brown (2.SY 5/2) loamy clay through 18+ inches. Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Quendall Terminals 19 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation Soil saturation was observed at the surface in the majority of Wetland D with standing water near the lake's edge. The primary hydrologic indicator in the upper extent of Wetland D included sparsely vegetated concave surface and water-stained leaves. In the upland plot, saturation was observed at the surface. Three sample plots were established as part of Wetland D: SP! Wet, SP2Wet, and SPlUp (Appendices A, D, and D). SP! Wet and SP2Wet contained indicators of hydrophytic vegetation, wetland hydrology, and hydric soils. The upland plot, SP! Up, had indicators of wetland hydrology and hydric soils, but lacked hydrophytic vegetation. Twenty-two flags were used to identify the Wetland D boundary (Appendix A). 3.2.5 WetlandE Wetland E is a 0.11-acre ( 4,556-sf) depressional wetland that contains PFO and PSS habitat located in the southwest corner of the study area (Figure 7; Appendix A). Like Wetlands B, C, and G, Wetland Eis a constructed stormwater feature in the study area, but it contains a more developed and mature forested component than the others (Photographs 1 and 2 in Appendix F). Wetland vegetation is dominated by young black cottonwood, Pacific willow, red alder, and red-osier dogwood. Dominant buffer vegetation includes Japanese knotweed and Himalayan blackberry, and a few mature black cottonwoods and young red alders (Photograph 5 in Appendix F). The entire wetland buffer apparently was maintained as transportation routes (roads) or staging areas (log storage) up until the facility closed in the past few years. These areas, other than the roads, have now become overgrown with upland invasive species, such as Scot's broom ( Cytisus scoparius) and Himalayan blackberry. The dirt roads remain and are heavily compacted, supporting very little vegetation. Wildlife use of Wetland E and its buffer was not evident other than a few stick and leaf nests. There were some physical indicators of beaver foraging, but the teeth marks were very old and not very common. There was no evidence of aquatic organisms within the standing water of the wetland other than plants. Wildlife observed in the wetland and its buffer includes spotted towhee, Anna's hummingbird, northwest crow, American robin, song sparrow, and Wilson's snipe ( Gallinago delicata). The open water habitat within the wetland quickly transitions to a scrub-shrub, young forest buffer habitat. This transition of an open water habitat to a wetland to a disturbed upland offers both soft and hard edges between Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qµendall Terminals 20 November 2009 060059-01 W ctland Delineation habitats. Movement of wildlife from the wetland habitat to the upland or from the upland to the wetland appears healthy and may offer migration, forage, shelter, and breeding opportunities for some species of amphibians, waterfowl, and mammals. The transition from the disturbed maintained upland habitats to the wetland habitat offers a more abrupt transition to wildlife. Hard edges tend to benefit some species while creating a less beneficial habitat for others. Migration, forage, shelter, and breeding near or in these areas may be limited for many species. Contaminated soil and sediments in this wetland may limit the quality, use, and function of these habitats and corridors. Because of the presence of contamination in the study area, soil pits were not excavated in Wetland E. The wetland determination for each plot was based on hydrology and vegetation data. The majority of Wetland E had standing water at the surface with some areas appearing in excess of 2-feet deep. A staff gauge was installed in 1995 to monitor water levels in 1995 and 1996 (Aspect 2009). At the time of the survey, the water level was around O foot; however, there were indications that the high water line on the gauge exceeded 3.5 feet. It is not known if this device was installed relative to any fixed position, but it does provide details on the storage capacity of the wetland. Wetland hydrology was not observed in the upland plot. Two sample plots were established as part of Wetland E: SPlWet and SPlUp (Appendices A, C, and D). SPl Wet contained indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology. The upland plot lacked any indications of hydrophytic vegetation or wetland hydrology. Nineteen flags were used to identify the Wetland E boundary (Appendix A). 3.2.6 WetlandF Wetland Fis a small 0.11-acre (546-sf) lake-fringe and slope wetland that contains LSS and LEM habitat (Figure 7; Appendix A). The entire boundary of Wetland F was delineated within the study area. Wetland Fis associated with Lake Washington (Photographs 1 and 2 in Appendix F) and is located in the center of the study area, immediately west of Wetland C. Wetland vegetation is dominated by red alder, Pacific willow, soft rush, and reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea). Dominant buffer vegetation includes Japanese knotweed and Himalayan blackberry (Photograph 3 in Appendix F). Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Repon Quendall Terminals 21 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation Although Wetland F is a very small wetland, wildlife use in the wetland and buffer was evident through several physical indicators such as shell and crustacean middens, forage snags, waterfowl droppings, beaver forage marks, and mammal tunnels in the dense vegetation. There was also evidence of recent turtle use (wet log) of a partially submerged log at the edge of the wetland bordering the lake. No wildlife was observed in the wetland or its buffer during field investigations. Half of the wetland perimeter is along Lake Washington, offering a transition from an open water habitat to a wetland to a vegetated upland. Movement of wildlife from the upland habitat to the wetland to the lake appears unobstructed and may offer migration, forage, shelter, and breeding opportunities for specific species of amphibians, waterfowl, and mammals. The actual wetland is so small that habitat function associated with the wetland may be reduced as an area for migration, forage, shelter, and breeding. Soils in the wetland plot included dark grayish-brown (2.5Y 4/2) sand with yellowish brown (lOYR 5/6) mottles to 6 inches deep (Appendix D). Below about 6 inches, dark gray (2.5Y 4/1) sand with dark yellowish-brown (lOYR 4/6) mottles was observed in the matrix. Soil pits in the upland plot were not excavated in Wetland F because of the presence of contamination. Wetland hydrology was evident with free-standing water in the sample plot within about 10 inches of the surface. Wetland hydrology was not observed in the upland plot. Two sample plots were established as part of Wetland F: SPlWet and SPlUp (Appendices A, C, and D). SPl Wet contained indicators of hydrophytic vegetation, wetland hydrology, and hydric soils. The upland plot lacked hydrophytic vegetation and any indication of wetland hydrology. Soils were not examined in the upland plot. Four flags were used to identify the Wetland F boundary (Appendix A). 3.2.7 WetlandG Wetland G is a small, approximately 0.05-acre (2,198-sf) depressional wetland (Figure 7; Appendix A). It is thought that Wetland G was excavated as part of construction of berms to direct tar on the site into Wetland B (Aspect 2009). The wetland is narrow and ditch-like Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Quendall Tenninals 22 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation and at one time conveyed stormwater to Wetland B, but has since been separated by a compacted dirt road separating the two (no culverts were found) (Figure 7). During prolonged rain events, Wetland G likely fills to capacity and sheetflows into Wetland B. Wetland G is positioned in the landscape approximately 2 to 4 feet below the rest of the study area. Wetland G contains PSS and PFO habitat. Wetland vegetation is dominated by black cottonwood, Pacific willow, and Himalayan blackberry, with an isolated patch of emergent vegetation. Dominant wetland buffer vegetation includes black cottonwood, black twinberry, and Himalayan blackberry (Figure 4; Photographs 7 and 8 in Appendix F). Based on aerial photography, it appears that more than half of the current areas adjacent to Wetland Gare or have been maintained as transportation routes (roads) or staging areas (log storage). Appendix H provides a historic aerial photo from 1990 that shows log storage and roads present in the current location of Wetland G. These areas, aside from one existing road to the west, have now become overgrown with upland invasive plants such as Scot's broom, Japanese knotweed, and Himalayan blackberry. Physical evidence of wildlife use in Wetland G was limited possibly due to the wetland's long and narrow shape. Wildlife observed in the wetland and its buffer includes northwest crow, song sparrow, and black-capped chickadee. The narrow scrub-shrub habitat and small patches of young forest buffer habitat offer wildlife a possible corridor of cover/shelter along or through the wetland. This wetland and buffer habitat extends further east than any other wetland at the project site and overlaps with the buffer from Wetland B, creating a corridor to Lake Washington. Due to the narrow shape of the wetland, migration, forage, shelter, and breeding near or in these areas may be limited for many species. Contaminated soil and sediments in this wetland may limit the quality, use, and function of these habitats and corridors. Because of the presence of contamination in the study area, soil pits were not excavated in Wetland G. The wetland determination for each plot was based on hydrology and vegetation data. Wetland G is a narrow, ditch-like wetland that primarily receives stormwater runoff from the study area and direct precipitation. Standing water was present in much of the wetland. The upland plot did not display any wetland hydrology indicators. Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qµendall Terminals 23 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation Two sample plots were established as part of Wetland G: SP! Wet and SP] Up (Appendices A, C, and D). SPl Wet contained indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology. The upland plot contained indicators of hydrophytic vegetation but lacked wetland hydrology. Eighteen flags were used to identify the Wetland G boundary (Appendix A). 3.2.8 WetlandH Wetland H is an approximately 0.01-acre (511-sf) slope and depressional wetland located on the southern edge of the study area along the property boundary (Figure 7; Appendix A). Like many of the other features described in this report, Wetland H was constructed as a storm water feature to control stormwater. Work was conducted in January 2006 to control silt and wood debris from flowing into Lake Washington. Wetland H was excavated in January 2006 to clean out the ditch along the southern portion of the site. Four rock check dams were placed in the cleared ditch at approximately 25-foot intervals to allow for sediment and wood debris control. Although Wetland H contains wetland indicators, it is located in an area that was excavated to function as stormwater conveyance off the site and into Lake Washington. Wetland H is positioned in the landscape approximately 2 to 4 feet below the rest of the study area and contains PFO, PSS, and PEM habitats (Figure 2; Photographs 9 and 10 in Appendix F). It is adjacent to a 15-foot-tall engineered concrete block wall, which is the boundary line between the project site and the newly developed parcel to the south. The low area extends along the concrete block wall and develops more ditch-like characteristics near Wetland H and Lake Washington. Wetland vegetation is dominated by mature black cottonwood, red alder, Pacific willow, and Himalayan blackberry. Dominant wetland buffer vegetation includes reed canarygrass and Himalayan blackberry. Effectively, the wetland only has two-thirds of its buffer. Wildlife use of Wetland H and its buffer may be increased by the presence of an adjacent concrete wall south of the wetland. Species traveling south or north may follow the wall until they reach the shoreline, effectively routing them through Wetland H or its buffer. Several physical indicators of wildlife presence within the wetland and the buffer were observed: woodpecker cavities, stick nests, forage snags, and beaver forage marks. Wildlife observed in the wetland and its buffer includes black-capped chickadee, song sparrow, Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Quendall Terminals 24 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation spotted towhee, Downy woodpecker, and northwest crow. The entire area from the open water habitat of Lake Washington to the west, through the wetland, to the upland buffer is fully vegetated and may provide good shelter as well as a migration path for wildlife. Movement of wildlife from the buffer to the wetland to the lake, or back, may offer healthy migration, forage, shelter, and breeding opportunities for specific species of amphibians, waterfowl, and mammals. A single soil pit in the wetland was excavated and photographed in Wetland H; however, because of the presence of contamination in the study area, the soils were not handled and no information was recorded. The wetland determination for each plot was based on hydrology and vegetation data. Wetland H is a narrow ditch-like wetland that primarily receives storm water runoff from the study area and direct precipitation. Adjacent to the wetland is another, smaller constructed stormwater feature that also collects stormwater from portions of the site. This feature sits at a higher elevation than Wetland Hand conveys stormwater from an adjacent ditch through a culvert to the eastern extent of the wetland. Flowing water was present during the survey. The upland plot did not display indications of wetland hydrology. Two sample plots were established as part of Wetland H: SPl Wet and SPl Up (Appendices A, C, and D). SPl Wet contained indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology. The upland sample plot lacked indicators of wetland vegetation and hydrology. 3.2.9 Wetland/ Wetland I is an approximately 0.05-acre (2,358-sf) depressional wetland located on the small portion of the property across Lake Washington Boulevard (Figure 7; Appendix A). Like many of the other features described in this report, Wetland I is a result of land surface manipulation and road construction. Wetland I is positioned in the landscape between I-405 and Lake Washington Boulevard where it receives stormwater runoff from adjacent impervious surfaces. The wetland contains PSS and PEM habitats (Figure 2; Photograph 15 in Appendix F) and all habitats are dominated by Japanese knotweed. Wetland vegetation is either stunted or dying adjacent to or under the thick canopy of Japanese knotweed. Dominant wetland buffer vegetation includes Himalayan blackberry and Pacific willow. Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qµendall Terminals 25 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation 3.3 Regulatory Framework Guidance from USFWS, Ecology, and the City was used to determine the wetland classifications. Information and excerpts from the specific guidance language are provided below. 3.3.l USFWS Classification The wetlands identified in the study area have been classified using the system developed by Cowardin et al. (1979) for use in the NW!. Table 3 lists the USFWS classifications for the wetlands and their connections to surface waters. Table 3 USFWS Wetland Classifications and Connections to Surface Water Wetland A B C D E F G H I J Notes: PFO -Palustrine forested PSS -Palustrine scrub-shrub PEM -Palustrine emergent POW -Palustrine open water USFWS Classification Connection to Surface Water LFO, LSS, & LEM Associated with Lake Washington PSS, POW, PEM, and PFO Not associated to surface water PSS& POW Not associated to surface water LFO, LSS, & LEM Associated with Lake Washington PSS & PFO Not associated to surface water LSS & LEM Associated with Lake Washington PSS& POW Not associated to surface water PFO, PSS, & PEM Associated with Lake Washington PSS Not associated to surface water PSS & PEM Flows to adjacent stream LFO-Lacustrine forested LSS -Lacustrine scrub-shrub LEM -Lacustrine emergent 3.3.2 Ecology Rating, Classification, and Functions and Values Scores The wetlands identified in the study area have been rated using Ecology's Washington State Wetland Rating System -Westem Washington: Revised (Ecology 2004) and Wetland Rating Form -Westem Washington: Revised (Ecology 2006). As part of the rating process, an examination of the soil is required for depressional wetlands to determine if "2 inches below the surface (or duff layer) is clay or organic." Although soil plots were not collected in all Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Quendall Terminals 28 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation upland depressional wetlands (constructed stormwater features) due to the presence of contamination, observations from other soil plots throughout the site and soil series maps suggest no soils were clay or organic. Table 4 lists the wetland ratings and classifications. Water quality, hydrologic, and habitat functional values are shown in Table 5. A summary of the wetland rating scores and the Ecology Wetland Rating forms are included in Appendix E. Table4 Summary of Wetland Classes and Rating Scores Using Ecology Wetlands Rating System Hydrogeomorphic Wetland Area (acres) Classification Wetland A 0.08 Slope/Lake Fringe Wetland B 0.14 Depressional Wetland C 0.03 Depressional Wetland D 0.38 Slope/Lake Fringe Wetland E 0.11 Depressional Wetland F 0.01 Slope/Lake Fringe Wetland G 0.05 Depressional Wetland H 0.01 Slope Wetland I 0.05 Depressional Wetland J a.as• Depressional/Slope Note: *Full extent of Wetland J is undetermined due to right-of-way crossing. Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineadon Report Qµendall Tenninals 29 State Rating (Ecology) Ill 111 IV II 111 111 111 IV Ill Ill November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation Table 5 Summary of Functions and Values Wetland Rating Scores Water Quality Water Hydrologic Hydrologic Habitat Habitat Functions Quality Functions Functions Functions Functions Total Potential Opportunity Potential Opportunity Potential Opportunity Functions Wetland Score (Yes/No) Score (Yes/No) Score Score Score 1 Total No= 1 No= 1 Maximum 16 16 18 18 72 Score Yes= 2 Yes=2 A 6 2 4 2 9 11 40 B 2 2 12 2 6 8 42 C 2 2 8 2 0 6 26 D 9 2 6 2 12 12 54 E 7 2 12 2 7 5 50 F 6 2 4 2 6 9 35 G 9 2 8 2 4 7 45 H 3 2 3 2 7 6 25 I 9 2 8 2 3 6 43 J 7 2 5 2 8 6 38 Note: 1-Calculated as (Water Quality Functions Potential Score times Water Quality Opportunity Score) plus (Hydrologic Functions Potential Score times Hydrologic Functions Opportunity Score) plus Habitat Functions Potential Score plus Habitat Functions Opportunity Score Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report QuendaD Terminals 30 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation 3.3.3 City of Renton Wetland Classification Guidance Wetlands were also rated according to City wetland rating criteria in the RMC (City of Renton 2009). The City classifies wetlands into three categories (Category 1, Category 2, and · Category 3) based on the City critical areas regulations. Appropriate wetland buffers have been identified according to the current RMC (City of Renton 2009). City ratings and buffer widths are provided in Table 6. Table 6 City of Renton Wetland Ratings and Standard Buffer Distance Study Area Size State Rating Local Rating Buffer Width Wetlands (acres) (Ecology) (City of Renton) (feet) Wetland A 0.08 111 2 50 feet Wetland B 0.14 Ill 1 100 feet Wetland C 0.03 IV 3 25 feet Wetland D 0.38 II 2 50 feet Wetland E 0.11 111 1 100 feet Wetland F 0.01 111 2 50 feet Wetland G 0.05 Ill 3 25 feet1 Wetland H 0.01 IV 3 25 feet Wetland I 0.05 Ill 3 25 feet Wetland J 0.05 2 Ill 3 25 feet Total 0.89 Notes: 1-Wetland G is exempt from City of Renton critical area requirements based on the criteria in RMC 4-3-050 CS(f), as discussed in Section 3.5. 2 -Full extent of Wetland J is undetermined due to right-of-way crossing. 3.4 Wetland Functions and Values Summary In general, wetlands in the study area provide many functions including water quality improvements, floodwater storage, groundwater recharge, and wildlife habitat. The wetlands in the study area can be divided into two categories: wetlands that are constructed stormwater features and wetlands that are naturally occurring. The constructed stormwater features generally display a higher opportunity to provide hydrologic function than naturally occurring wetlands, given their storage capacities to control flow during large storm events. Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qµendall Tenninals 31 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation However, the constructed stormwater features also display generally low to moderate opportunity and potential to provide habitat value and opportunity to provide water quality value. The naturally occurring wetlands on the main parcel (Wetlands A, D, and F) are all slope and lake-fringe wetlands and provide moderate potential and opportunity to provide habitat function; however, given the nature of lake-fringe wetlands, they provide only low to moderate potential to provide water quality and hydrologic functions. The functional values of wetlands in the study area were rated according to the most current version of the Ecology Washington State Wetlands Rating System -Western Washington: Revised (Ecology 2004). Based on the rating scores, the overall functions of each of the three wetland rating categories of water quality, hydrologic, and wildlife habitat are rated as low (less than 34 percent of the maximum possible score), moderate (34 percent to 67 percent of the maximum possible score), or high (greater than 68 percent of the maximum possible score). Overall, the majority of wetlands in the study area have low to moderate water quality, hydrologic, and wildlife habitat function scores. Few of the wetlands have high hydrologic function scores and none of the wetlands have high water quality or habitat function scores. Of the ten wetlands in the study area, six were identified as depressional wetlands, three were identified as lake fringe wetlands, and one was identified as a slope wetland. Ecology wetland rating forms are provided in Appendix E. A summary of the wetland classes and functions and values rating scores is provided in Table 5. Wetland acreage also affects function. No wetland in the study area is larger than 1 acre. Because large wetlands have more capacity for capturing stormwater flows, improving water quality, and providing a variety of habitats for wildlife, they are more likely to provide beneficial functions than smaller wetlands. Water quality, hydrologic, and habitat functional values for wetlands in the study area are described below. For each function category, the wetlands' opportunity to provide that function is described first and the wetlands' potential to provide that function is described thereafter. Wetland buffers are areas of land surrounding a wetland boundary that protect wetlands from the effects of adjacent land use. Buffers help wetlands function by filtering storm runoff from surrounding developments, trapping sediment, absorbing nutrients, attenuating high flows, and providing wildlife habitat. Buffers also physically separate wetlands from developed areas in order to lessen noise, light, chemical pollution, and other associated Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark DeHneation Report QuendaU Terminals 32 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation human-related disturbances. Most of the wetlands in the study area are adjacent to some disturbed habitat, roadway, or compacted dirt roads. With the exception of the three lake- fringe wetlands in the study area, wetland buffer habitat is generally of low quality and typically includes compacted dirt and roads, and is nearly devoid of vegetation. The buffers associated with each wetland, per local codes, are detailed in Table 6. 3.4.1 Water Quality Functions All of the wetlands in the study area provide opportunities to improve water quality, to varying degrees, primarily because their location in an urban environment allows the opportunity for water quality improvement. Three of the ten wetlands in the study area have a low potential (less than 34 percent of the maximum possible score) to improve water quality. This low score was observed in three of the five constructed stormwater features, which have characteristics of intermittent flowing or highly constricted surface outlets, and contain permanently ponded water, precluding cyclic changes between oxic and anoxic conditions. The remaining seven wetlands have moderate potential (34 to 67 percent of the maximum possible score) to improve water quality. None of the wetlands has a high potential to improve water quality (greater than 68 percent of the maximum possible score). Additionally, the moderate score is also due to the nature oflake-fringe wetlands (Wetlands A, D, F), which have a maximum score of only 12 for water quality function instead of the maximum of 16 that other wetland types have. This is because lake-fringe wetlands typically do not improve water quality to the same extent that riverine or depressional wetlands do, because oflower denitrification rates, and because ofthe fact that any pollutants taken up in plant material will be more easily released into the water column when the plants die off (Ecology 2006). Wetlands with moderate or high scores typically have characteristics such as organic soils, a high proportion of wetland area with seasonal ponding, or dense vegetation to restrict flow through the wetland. 3.4.2 Hydrologic Functions All of the wetlands in the study area provide opportunities to reduce flooding and erosion to varying degrees. Four of the ten wetlands in the study area have a low potential (less than 34 percent of the maximum possible score) to reduce flooding and erosion. The low scores for potential hydrologic functions are due to a lack of natural surface water outlets, ponding features, and the types of vegetation necessary to reduce surface flows. Four of the wetlands Wedand and Ordinary High Water.Mark Delineation Report Qµendall Tenninals 33 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation have moderate potential (34 percent to 67 percent of the maximum possible score) to improve hydrologic functions. The remaining two wetlands, Wetlands C and E, have high potential to improve hydro logic functions (greater than 68 percent of the maximum possible score). Wetlands with moderate or high scores typically have characteristics such as a highly constricted outlets or significant water storage depths during wet periods. 3.4.3 Habitat Functions Habitat function of the study area wetlands is further defined by their Cowardin classifications (forested, scrub-shrub, emergent, and aquatic bed). Two wetlands are classified as scrub-shrub and open water system; one wetland includes scrub-shrub and forested systems; two wetlands include scrub-shrub and emergent systems; three wetlands include forested, scrub-shrub, and emergent systems (see Table 2); and three wetlands include forested, scrub-shrub, emergent, and open water systems (see Table 3). Wetlands with mixed classifications are generally of higher value than wetlands with a single classification. Three of the ten wetlands have a low opportunity (less than 34 percent of the maximum possible score) to provide habitat for many species. The low score for habitat opportunity is due to the characteristics of the wetland buffers and the overall lack of quality habitat conditions near or adjacent to the wetlands. The remaining seven wetlands have a moderate score (34 to 67 percent of the maximum possible score), and none of the wetlands has a high score (greater than 68 percent of the maximum possible score). Wetlands with moderate or high scores typically have characteristics such as a several Cowardin vegetation classes, several hydroperiods, high habitat interspersion, or the presence of special habitat features. Six of the ten wetlands have a low potential (less than 34 percent of the maximum possible score) to provide habitat for many species. The low score for habitat functions is due to the general lack of vegetative structure, hydroperiods, plant richness, habitat diversity, and special habitat features, especially characteristic of Wetland C, which received a score of 0. The remaining four wetlands have a moderate potential score (34 to 67 percent of the maximum possible score). Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Quendall Terminals 34 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation 3.5 Exempt Wetlands Wetland G is exempt from any activity affecting these wetlands, as described in RMC 4-3- 050 C5(f). It is a hydrologically isolated Category 3 wetland smaller than 2,200 sf. Standing water does not appear to be present in sufficient amounts to support breeding amphibians (i.e., less than approximately 12 inches in water depth from approximately December through May). No species are listed by federal or state government agencies as endangered or threatened, and the presence of essential habitat for those species is not present. Any impacts to Wetland G for cleanup activities will be mitigated for hydrologic and water quality functions. As shown in Table 5, hydrologic and water quality function is provided at a moderate level for Wetland G. Although Wetlands C, F, and H are smaller than 2,200 sf, they do not meet the exemption criteria in RMC. Wetlands F and H are not hydrologically isolated due to their proximity to Lake Washington. Wetland C has sufficient water depths in the winter to potentially provide amphibian breeding habitat, but the presence of contamination in Wetland C limits the habitat quality. However, Wetland C was constructed for stormwater treatment in 2006, as described in Section 3.6.1, and is not expected to be regulated by the City of Renton. 3.6 Constructed Stormwater Features Five wetlands in the study area were apparently constructed as part of historic site activities in an attempt to control stormwater on the site during large storm events, and to avoid disruption to the log storage operation that has since been abandoned. Based on recent aerial photographs (Appendix H), site history, and other references, Wetlands B, C, G, and H were constructed to manage stormwater or control spills associated with site activities. Historic construction of each of these features influences the regulatory status as determined by the City and EPA. Wetland Eis thought to have developed from changes to recent stormwater drainage on the site based on the fact that it did not qualify as a wetland during the 1997 David Evans and Associates wetland delineation conducted on the site (Appendix G). 3.6.1 Excavated Features from the 1970s Wetland B was excavated in the early 1970s as a retention pond to control tar from flowing into the lake (King County Metro 1972). It is thought that Wetland G was also excavated at Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qµendall Terminals 35 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation the same time as part of construction of berms to direct tar on the site into Wetland B (Aspect 2009). Wetland B continues to provide stormwater retention for the Site. 3.6.2 Best Management Practices Implementation -2006 Work was conducted in January 2006 to implement best management practices to control silt and wood debris from flowing into Lake Washington. Work was conducted in the ditch along the southern property boundary (Wetland H) and in the area of Wetlands Band C. The work was conducted as recommended by Ecology to control potential sources of contamination from entering Lake Washington (Phoinix 2006). The entirety of Wetland C was constructed in January 2006 to prevent stormwater from flowing into Lake Washington (Phoinix 2006). An earthen berm was also constructed along the southern portion of Wetland C. Check dams were installed to control turbid water and floating debris. Wetland C was constructed in an upland area that did not contain wetland indicators, based on the fact that Wetland C was not identified during a wetland delineation conducted by David Evans and Associates in 1997 (Appendix G). Work was also completed on Wetland B to improve storm water flow conditions in 2006. Along the north side· of Wetland B, an outfall was excavated to create a stable outlet for stormwater into Lake Washington (Phoinix 2006). Wetland H was excavated in January 2006 as part of best management practices to clean out the ditch along the southern portion of the site. Four rock check dams were placed in the cleared ditch at approximately 25-foot intervals to allow for sediment and wood debris control. Although Wetland H contains wetland indicators, it is located in an area that was excavated to function as stormwater conveyance off the site and into Lake Washington. Wetland H also was not identified during the 1997 wetland delineation (Appendix G). 3.6.3 Anticipated Regulatory Status Wetlands B, C, G, and H may not be subject to City of Renton Critical Area regulations based on the history of their construction. According to RMC 4-11-230, "wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created for purposes other than wetland mitigation, including, but not limited to ... drainage ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, detention Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Quendall Terminals 36 November 2009 060059-01 Wetland Delineation facilities, wastewater treatment facilities." Wetlands B, C, G, and Hall were excavated from upland areas to manage spills or stormwater runoff. Excavation of Wetlands Band G occurred in the 1970s. Excavation and construction of Wetlands C and H occurred in 2006. At that time, nearly the entire Site was being used for log storage and associated activities, as documented in the 1990 aerial photo (Appendix H). In addition, Wetland G is exempt from City of Renton Critical Area regulations, provided that mitigation for hydrologic and water quality functions is provided for any impacts to the wetland. EPA may not choose to regulate Wetlands B, C, E, G, H, I, and J as waters of the U.S. based on their proximity to known waters of the U.S. (e.g., Lake Washington or Gypsy Creek). They may be determined to be isolated from waters of the U.S. and therefore not regulated, pending EPA's evaluation. Although wetland jurisdictional determinations are generally conducted by the Corps, impacts to these wetlands will occur as a result of a cleanup action under Superfund _and are therefore regulated by EPA. Other wetlands along the shoreline, including Wetlands A, F, and D, are expected to be regulated as waters of the U.S. because they abut Lake Washington. 3.7 Wetland Delineation and Typing Limitations Wetland identification is an inexact science and differences of professional opinion often occur between trained individuals. Final determinations for wetland boundaries and typing concurrence or adjustment needs are the responsibility of the regulating resource agency. Wetlands are, by definition, transitional areas; their boundaries can be altered by changes in hydrology or land use. In addition, the definition of jurisdictional wetlands may change. If a physical change occurs in the basin or 5 years pass before the proposed project is undertaken, another wetland survey should be conducted. The results and conclusions expressed herein represent Anchor QEA's professional judgment based on the information available. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Quendall Tenninals 37 November 2009 060059-01 Lake Washington OHWM Delineation and Lake Study 4 LAKE WASHINGTON OHWM DELINEATION AND LAKE STUDY Anchor QEA ecologists identified and delineated the OHWM of approximately 1,400 feet of Lake Washington within the study area between the neighboring parcels to the north and south. Habitat features of these two channels are described in the following sections. The result of the OHWM delineation is shown on Figure 7 and in Appendix B. 4.1 Lake Washington OHWM Delineation Methods To document the Lake Washington OHWM within the study area, Anchor QEA ecologists reviewed existing information (described in Section 1.1), performed an aerial photograph analysis, and conducted site visits on April 23 and 30, and May 6, 2009. The OHWM delineation was completed by walking the lake shoreline beginning at the south end of the study area and moving north. Photographs were also taken to document OHWM conditions (Photographs 11, 12, and 13 in Appendix F). During the site visits, the OHWM of the entire length within the study area was identified and flagged. The OHWM boundary was marked with pin flags and later surveyed by a professional surveyor. Anchor QEA ecologists identified the stream OHWM boundary consistent with Chapter 90.58 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) and Chapter 173-22 of the WAC. The WAC defines the OHWM as: '"Ordinary high water line' means the mark on the shores of all waters that will be found by examining the bed and banks and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual and so long continued in ordinary years, as to mark upon the soil or vegetation a character distinct from that of the abutting upland: Provided, that in any area where the ordinary high water line cannot be found the ordinary high water line adjoining saltwater shall be the line of mean higher high water and the ordinary high water line adjoining freshwater shall be the elevation of the mean annual flood." Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Quendall Terminals 38 November 2009 060059-01 Lake Washington OHWM Delineation and Lake Study 4.2 Lake Washington OHWM Delineation Results Anchor QEA ecologists identified and delineated the OHWM of approximately 1,400 feet of Lake Washington within the study area between the neighboring parcels to the north and south. This included the placement of 43 pin flags installed at all meandering locations of the shoreline. Additionally, the OHWM was coincident with Wetlands A, D, and F and formed the western boundary of each of those wetlands. The OHWM is shown on Figure 7. Detailed flag locations are shown on drawings in Appendix B. Overall, the southern half of the study area contained an OHWM that was clearly defined by an armored shoreline consisting of large boulders. The northern half was not as clearly defined, with a gradual transition from the upland to the water as well as former pier structures and large floating logs along the lake's edge. This half of the property was delineated using the investigators' best professional judgment and based on parameters set forth in Chapter 90.58 of the RCW and Chapter 173-22 of the WAC (Photographs 12 through 14 in Appendix F). Water depth during the investigation adjacent to the OHWM ranged from about 4 inches to more than 3 feet deep. 4.3 Lake Study According to RMC 4-3-090, and consistent with Washington State Administrative Code (WAC 173-26-251 and RCW 90.58.030(2)(e))), Lake Washington is classified as a Shoreline of Statewide Significance, meaning "lakes, whether natural, artificial, or a combination thereof, with a surface acreage of one thousand acres or more measured at the ordinary high water mark," and thus subject to the local jurisdiction's SMA. The SMA governs the use and development of shorelines in Washington State for responsible shoreline development with environmental protection and public access. Subsequent activities along the shoreline will include remediation of hazardous substances in lake sediments and/or in the upland portions of the Site, as directed by EPA. The sediment and upland cleanup is being performed under Superfund. All substantive provisions of City regulatory requirements will be met by the cleanup remedy selected by EPA. Additional information on the existing lake conditions will be included in the RI. Details on each of the remedial alternatives considered will be included in the FS. Previous information on the Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qµendall Terminals 39 November 2009 060059-01 I Lake Washington OHWM Delineation and Lake Study aquatic habitat conditions is included in Appendix G. A summary of known fish species present is described below. 4.3.1 Fish Species Presence During the surveys, no fish were observed along the lakeshore of the study area; however, the Salmon and Steelhead Habitat Limiting Factors Report for WRIA 8 identifies five salmonid species that use Lake Washington, and could reasonably be expected to occur along the property: sockeye, coho, Chinook, coastal cutthroat, and rainbow/steelhead trout (Kerwin 2001). Anadromous forms of each of these species are present, so individuals are present in the lake both as adults during migrations to spawning grounds and as juveniles. Sockeye are known to spawn along some beaches of the lake while there are unconfirmed reports of Chinook spawning in littoral areas of the lake. Non-anadromous forms of winter steelhead (rainbow trout), sockeye (kokanee), and cutthroat also occur in the lake. Resident rainbow trout spend their entire life in Lake Washington. Non-anadromous coastal cutthroat trout also occur in Lake Washington and are much more abundant than the anadromous form (Nowak 2000). Other non-anadromous species expected to occur near the study area include: longfin smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys), sticklebacks (Gasterosteusspp.), and dace (Leuciscusspp.). Non- native freshwater species known to occur in Lake Washington, and likely found near the study area include: black crappie (Pomoxis nigromaculatus), bluegill (Lepomis macrocheilus), common carp ( Cyprinus carpio), largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus), smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomiew), tench ( Tinca tinca), and yellow perch (Perea flavescens). Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qpendall Tenninals 40 November 2009 060059-01 Shoreline Restoration Plan 5 SHORELINE RESTORATION PLAN 5.1 Introduction and Purpose This section presents a conceptual shoreline restoration plan to create significant net ecological functional improvement to the Lake Washington shoreline, riparian buffer, and wetlands and associated buffers. Subject to EPA approval under their CERCLA authorities, the plan would offset impacts resulting from prospective Site remediation efforts (e.g., capping) related to hazardous substances as may be present in lake sediments and in the upland portions of the Site. All wetland impacts at the Site are anticipated to occur as a result of CERCLA remediation. Because the sediment and upland cleanup is being perfo.med under CERCLA, all substantive provisions of City regulatory requirements will be met by the cleanup remedy selected by EPA. Although specific details on remedial alternatives have not yet been developed, they will be included in the FS following additional testing and discussions with EPA. Once Site remediation is completed under CERCLA, the remaining wetlands will not be impacted by the planned redevelopment. This conceptual shoreline restoration plan provides the City with information on the wetlands to be impacted as pan of the cleanup and some general information on the types of mitigation that will occur, all subject to EPA approval. There are no anticipated wetland impacts from the planned redevelopment and therefore no mitigation is required as part of Site redevelopment. It is generally assumed that any cleanup decision by EPA will result in impacts to Wetlands B, C, E, F, and G, and portions of Wetlands A and D. In general, projects with wetland impacts can only occur after it can be demonstrated that impacts to wetlands cannot be avoided, that impacts have been minimized to the greatest extent possible, and finally after adequate mitigation is provided. However, the cleanup will likely be ordered by EPA to address hazardous substance contamination on the Site that will result in unavoidable wetland impacts. Based on existing information on Site contamination, Wetlands H, I, and J, and portions of Wetlands A and D are not anticipated to be impacted by remediation actions. This conceptual shoreline restoration plan is intended to update the Mitigation Analysis Memorandum completed for the Quendall and Baxter properties in 2000 (AESI 2000). That memorandum was prepared to address cleanup-related impacts to wetlands and the lake Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Quendall Tenninals 41 November 2009 060059-01 Shoreline Restoration Plan shoreline when investigation and cleanup of the site were being conducted under Washington's Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA). That document was prepared for the City of Renton and Vulcan Nonhwest, and was developed with input from WDFW, Ecology, WDNR, the Corps, and the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, among others. Mitigation as a result of cleanup and development activities was completed on the Baxter site (located immediately nonh of the Quendall site) in 2007 according to the requirements in the Mitigation Analysis Memorandum. 5.2 Goals and Objectives The conceptual shoreline restoration plan would provide significant ecological functional gains for the Lake Washington shoreline including wetlands, buffers, and lake riparian areas. The conceptual plan would provide compensation necessary to mitigate impacts resulting from the prospective cleanup action (to be selected by EPA). Following cleanup, it is anticipated that the propeny would be redeveloped. A conceptual development plan is presented in Figure 8 to show how wetland creation/restoration ratios and buffer widths could potentially be applied to the site, subject to EPA's cleanup decisions. EPA has also included the resource agencies in its process and those agencies may be involved in future mitigation discussions, including changes to Site shoreline areas to funher improve ecological functions (see Figure 8). Subject to EPA approval, impacts to wetlands will likely be mitigated at a 1.5: 1 replacement ratio to offset functional losses resulting from Site remediation. This ratio is consistent with the Mitigation Analysis Memorandum (AESI 2000). Because Wetland G is exempt from critical area regulations, it will likely be mitigated at a 1: I ratio. If additional impacted wetlands are not regulated by the City and EPA (as discussed in Section 3.6), the total wetland restoration area may be smaller than what is presented in Figure 8. The conceptual shoreline restoration plan could also improve habitat for aquatic species within Lake Washington such as migrating juvenile salmon. Subject to EPA approval, shoreline habitat and complexity could be restored with appropriate habitat mix gravel, large woody debris, and overhanging vegetation. The large woody debris could be collected and stockpiled during remediation activities and reused along the shoreline to the extent practicable. Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Quendall Terminals 42 November 2009 060059-01 Shoreline Restoration Plan The conceptual shoreline restoration plan depicted in Figure 8 includes a 100-foot average width riparian buffer from the lake OHWM. This buffer is consistent with the Mitigation Analysis Memorandum (AESI 2000). The proposed riparian area could also provide a buffer for existing wetlands, and prospective wetland expansions in addition to providing a shoreline buffer. The new development adjacent to the shoreline following cleanup could provide a 100-foot average setback. The setback may fluctuate in width, depending on the proposed development plan. This setback is significantly greater than the SO-foot minimum setback required by the City of Renton Shoreline Master Program (RMC 4-3-090). 5.3 Elements of the Plan 5.3.1 Riparian Buffer Habitat Subject to EPA approval, the 100-foot average width riparian buffer would revegetate the area adjacent to Lake Washington (see Figure 8). The revegetation would focus on species diversity, species density allowing for varied light penetration, and the creation of different successional stages along the lake. A preliminary plant list for riparian buffer enhancement is presented in Table 7. Willow and water-tolerant shrub vegetation along the shoreline would provide shade for aquatic species. Deciduous-dominated forests would include open areas where sunlight can penetrate to the forest floor. Coniferous-dominated forests would provide important habitat for upland species. Long-term function of riparian areas would provide detritus inputs, insect drop, and woody debris inputs for aquatic species to support prey resources and provide cover for juvenile salmon. In addition, woody debris and substrate enhancement of the shoreline would support these aquatic ecological functions in the short term. Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qpendall Tenninals 43 November 2009 06{)()59-0 I Shoreline Restoration Plan Table 7 Riparian Buffer Plant List Common Name Scientific Name Groundcovers Lady Fern Athyrium filix-femina Salal Gau/theria shallon Sword Fern Polystichum munitum Willows/Shrubs Vine Maple Acer Circinatum Red-osier Dogwood Camus sericea Black Twinberry Lonicero invo/ucrata Oregon Grape Mahonia nervosa Nootka Rose Rosa nutkano Hooker's Willow Salix hookeriano Scouler's Willow Salix scouleriano Sitka Willow So/ix sitchensis Douglas Spirea Spiraea dauglasii Snowberry Symphoricarpos a/bus Trees Big Leaf Maple Acer macrophyllum Pacific Dogwood Cornus nuttalii Red Alder A/nus rubra Hazelnut Cory/us cornuta Oregon Ash Fraxinus latifolia Sitka Spruce Picea sitchensis Douglas Fir Psuedotsuga menziesii Black Cottonwood Popu/us tremu/oides Western Crabapple Pyrus fusca Western Hemlock Tsuga heterophylla 5.3.2 Wetland Restoration Subject to EPA approval, it is anticipated that wetland creation/restoration along the Lake Washington shoreline would expand existing Wetlands A, D, and J (see Figure 8). Impacts to existing lakeshore wetlands from cleanup activities (Wetlands A, D, and F) could be mitigated along the lakeshore, adjacent to Wetlands A and D. Impacts to existing wetlands Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qµendall Tenninals 44 November 2009 060059-01 Shoreline Restoration Plan that are not connected to the lakeshore (Wetlands B, C, E, and G) could be mitigated adjacent to Wetland J. In all areas, the creation/restoration would diversify the existing range of wetland habitat and will include emergent, scrub-shrub, and forested habitat areas. This includes restoration adjacent to Wetlands A and D for impacts to LFO, LSS, and LEM components of lakeshore Wetlands A, D, and F. In addition, the prospective wetland creation/restoration area adjacent to Wetland A could include a low swale (see Figure 8). This swale would connect to Lake Washington and diversify the marsh habitat by adding open water and emergent habitat. The creation of this swale could also offset impacts to POW habitats in Wetlands B and C. The swale could be designed to encourage seasonal use by juvenile salmonids with the placement of large woody debris (L WD). L WD provides habitat complexity and areas for cover for juvenile salmonids. Water quality and hydrologic functional improvements would also result from improved stormwater retention and capability to trap sediments through wetland, riparian, and associated buffer replanting. A preliminary plant list for wetland creation/restoration is presented in Table 8. Restoration adjacent to Wetland J would offset impacts to PSS, PEM, and PFO components of Wetlands B, C, E, and G. POW habitat would be replaced as part of restoration adjacent to Wetland A. The restoration/creation would replace current wetland areas with a wider range of wetland function and value. New wetland areas adjacent to Wetland J would provide an improvement to habitat quality and overall function from that provided by existing wetlands, which are compromised by the presence of soil and water contamination. Habitat function would also benefit from improved structure and diversity. Wetlands B, C, E, and G currently provide a moderate level of water quality and hydrologic function through stormwater retention. These wetlands currently have a higher opportunity to provide these functions due to the presence of contaminated stormwater on the site. Water quality and hydrologic functions provided by existing Wetlands B, C, E, and G would be replaced with improved on-site stormwater control and treatment as well as an increased ability to trap sediments as part of riparian and shoreline wetland buffer improvements. Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qµendall Terminals 45 November 2009 060059-01 Table 8 Wetland Plant List Common Name Scientific Name Emergents Slough Sedge Carex obnupta Hardstem Bulrush Scirpus acutus Small-fruited Bulrush Scirpus microcorpus Willows/Shrubs Red-osier Dogwood Cornus sericea Black Hawthorne Crataegus douglasii Black Twinberry Lonicera invo/ucrate Pacific Ninebark Physocarpus capitotus Hooker's Willow Salix hookeriana Pacific Willow Salix /asiandra Scouler's Willow Salix scouleriana Douglas Spirea Spiraea doug/asii Trees Red Alder A/nus rubra Sitka Spruce Picea sitchensis Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Deh'neation Repon Qµendall Terminals 46 Shoreline Restoration Plan November 2009 060059-01 References 6 REFERENCES AES!. 2000. Mitigation Analysis Memorandum, Qµendall and Baxter Properties, Renton, Washington. Prepared for Vulcan Northwest and City of Renton. February 17. Access Washington. 2009. Washington State Growth Management Act. Accessed online at http://www.gmhb.wa.gov/gma/index.html on February 23, 2009. Aspect Consulting, LLC (Aspect). 2009. Personal communication with Jeremy Porter regarding current understanding of historic property use and excavation of Wetland G. August 27. City of Renton. 1992. Renton's Critical Areas Inventory. Prepared by Jones and Stokes. City of Renton. 2009. Renton Municipal Code. Accessed online at http://www.codepublishing.com/wa/renton/ on June 11, 2009. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington D.C. Ecology. See Washington State Department of Ecology. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. Kerwin. 2001. Salmon and Steelhead Habitat Limiting Factors Report for the CEDAR- SAMMAMISH BASIN (Water Resource Inventory Area 8). Washington Conservation Commission. Olympia, WA. King County Metro.· Memorandum from Larry Peterson to Glen D. Harris regarding Quendall Terminals Co. Industrial Waste. March 29, 1972. Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Dehneadon Report QµendaU Tenmnals 47 November 2009 060059-01 References Munsell. 1994. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Kollmorgen Corporation, Baltimore, Maryland. Nowak, G.M. 2000. Movement patterns and feeding ecology of cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki clarki) in Lake Washington. M.S. Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle. Phoinix. 2006. Memorandum to Mr. John J. Tortorelli, Western Wood Lumber Company, regarding Best Management Practices (BMP) Implementation Project. January 19. Reed, P.B., Jr. 1988. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Biological Report 88 (26.9). Reed, P., Jr. 1993. Supplement to List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Supplement to Biological Report 88 (26.9). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). 2008. Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region, ed J.S. Wakeley, R.W. Lichvar, and C.V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-08-13. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1973. Soil Survey of King County, Washington. USDA Soil Conservation Service (SCS). USDA. 2001. Hydric Soil List for King County, Washington. USDA Soil Conservation Service. Accessed online at http://www.wa.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/soils/county _hydric_lists.html on May 8, 2009. USDA. 2009. Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey. Accessed online at http://soils.usda.gov/use/hydric/lists/state.html on June 11, 2009. Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark DeHneation Report Quendall Tenninals 48 November 2009 060059-01 References United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2009. USFWS Wetlands Mapper for National Wetlands Inventory Map Information. Accessed online at http://wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov on May 8, 2009 Washington Depanment of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 2009. Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) Maps in the Vicinity ofT24, ROSE, Section 29. Repon Date August 28 2009. Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). 1997. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Publication No. 96-94. Olympia, Washington. Ecology. 2004. Washington State Wetlands Rating System -Western Washington: Revised. Publication No. 04-06-15. Olympia, Washington. Ecology. 2006. Washington State Wetland Rating Form-Western Washington, version 2. Olympia, Washington. Ecology. 2009a. Environmental Information; Watersheds; WRIA 9 Duwamish/Green Basin. Accessed online at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/services/gis/maps/wria/number/wria9.htm on February 23, 2009 Ecology. 2009b. Washington State Shoreline Management Act. Accessed online at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/sma/laws_rules/index.html on September 5, 2009. Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qµendall Terminals 49 November 2009 060059-01 FIGURES 0 SOURCE : Base map prepared from Terrain Navigator Pro USGS 7 .5 minute quadrangle map of Bellevue South, Washington. WASHINGTON n 0 2000 Sea le in Feet DRAFT Figure 1 Vin c inity Map Port Quendall Terminal Natural Resource and Habitat Assessment Report N (:) u: r "O ,.; 0 9 a. a, 8 "' lil 9 ~ 8 <D :5 ...J c3 z w ::) 0 ~ 8 <D I :;J ~ § ~ (1) "8 g_ M N 0) 0 0 N ,.; 0 I "' '-ft. ANQEAC~ ~ ~ DRAFT LEGEND: Prop erty Lin e HORIZONTAL DATUM: Wa sh i ngton Sta te Plane North, NAD83/91. VERTICAL DATUM : NAVD88 0 0 150 Scale i n Feet Figure 2 Project Site and Aerial Photo Port Quendall Terminal Natural Resource and Habitat Assessment Report (') c., ii: r 0 N 'i' a.. ~ ~ 0 "' "' 8 ~ i 8 3 ..J c3 z w :) ~ "' 0 0 ~ .0 0 :?. ~ C: ~ 'O -~ "8 E "' "' 0 ~ /~ , ~o~ -i-~0 ~'r's // ':" / ' / '" , ' I ,, .· / ..,.<:i !::; ', . I !·· "''°'· .. ~ 1 / """. y ',, ' . ,",,! ~' / // I <s "-< . 1 ' · ;~ ·;/ 1 / , .. , .,s 'I 1.S . . 'o ' .' . ~ , I , . ·, 'o ,;' • ·0· i . . . / , '-I ·" ' ' I I ,o "' ,, , <<-''.h / ,1· .. / I "> r ., , '-"' I,' • . I / (/ ,, •• -·· ,·,T 1 ;::} ~ ;~ I 'I./' y· /·, , ' ' ' ' , · a f, O I I , / • 0 '\, '\, ; / • Pr operty Line , / • • " w <s ':,,. / ,/ .· 1 I 1 / I ,s-~~ ,_ / :io "' , . ; , ' .. · I ~ } "°s ,,.. -~ I (I I / V , ' ,. i:J ,, o A ,{' , A,· . .: / ,; 25 1 l I I~ I ~ / . / . ·,\, 2' ~ '-. <s / I O , Ji 1 /~. / l 25 ' -/ '- 1 '>'i 1 <:; I '-/, ......... ./ ..._...._, ,-,· I • , 1-<, "-.... :/ •• ' # : . . I .·/ 4 , , ' '<" > ~ /1 '· • '//'. I / / , l ,s , ;0 '. l , ,.~ _!1 ~ .. ',.1'-I I ~ C /1(;; ', 30 .:l. / /. '• •;' . / ", · "><, / . •· 0 " : .... f,, , ~ ; . / () • ' " ~ 0 ' ,, ' ,.... O Ill ' 0 . ' · ~- ( OHWM : • ' ' 30 ,o / $ "UJ • .. ·:1-'4' '.,1 / . .,,(:, I ~/ 25". , -,() . I.fl .A' '~.z;·f ' .. ' / . .·' ., 25 /')~-/, • ~ C ..., l'J "'o · ' , I ·· ·' ~ 1 Jo g :' -,o i I";!//, · ./ , :,<:l ,' ., /if .· .· ' ,. I .· I' / ,._ .,,C) \) " ,, ~rl ,3o '.· ./:;1_' . ,1 · / " : .Jo ,,; · I 1 .: · V l / C . IJ R> I :fl / ! \ I 1-'> . n~ "i ' C V,( ....... , "'5 / y .·" .,, ,/ '; / ' Jo > ( ~ '/ I.Y. /, I /, -" /··; "' '::,~~;---- / "'~ ~ ", ... ~ '-" 30 0 0 J/ I i . I I . ) 1/ ::;, I . /~,/ '.{ 'J . I ,, (<t . /I{ , , I , .1 h ,YS LEGEND: I -··-· ,l;!J . 2s "J. '1 ' I ~ ... ' ~.·--~-:' ,~',f,'/ /,/ . ")~ ' ~ -· · -· · -· · -Oridinary High Water Mark (OHWM) r ~ ",~ .,I . / i<; / N U" ~ ~ 1,/) ~ N t ~,., / t}, /_ / ·/ 25 ., .j ~ "'.s J 25 ~2 :s ~ Jr "25 -=-'}; 2S .J.30 ,., 0 s ~ ~ 30 30 -,,1:l so 30 / . ,,, , '~ I : I. "' 30 / :.'' . .,.; ~ ,. _,,,$' • "s ~ 11,,1 ~ (; 45 #' ------Property Line HORIZONTAL DATUM : Washington State Plane North, NAD83/91. VERTICAL DATUM : NAVD88 0 2s 25 -•.::.: -( ' ' :r gi -~----~-----;--"."" -~-·-~-~T/7 ::15 '~(.; t) ~ :-. ,, { ,,'..,. . / ~ :g' I/ ._;,,' .r.· C. 30 0 150 Sca l e i n Feet a, en DRAFT Figure 3 Site Topography Port Quendall Terminal Natural Resource and Habitat Assessmen t Report \f.~;~ DRAFT Property Lin e HORIZONTAL DATUM: Wash ington State Plane North, NA083/91. VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD88 0 0 250 Scafe in Feet Figure 4 Soil Map Port Quendal Terminal Natural Resource and Habitat Assessment Report "' ('.) u: ~ "O <O 'i' a. a;: I 9 i I _J ~ 0 z w ::::> 0 d, "' g 9 "' D 0 ::, i,: ~ "O ~ "8 E .. ci g N ~ 0. a> (j) ~ ANCHOR QE A ~ <..A' ,<,/ DRAFT LE G EN D : NW I Mapped Wet land locat i on Ord inar y High Wa t er Mark (OHWM) Pro perty Line NOTE : No wetlands w ere mapped o n the property on the King County Wet la nd I nventory. HORIZONTAL DATUM : Washingt on State Plane No rth, NAD83/91. VERTICA L DATU M: NAVD88 () 0 150 Se a le in Feet Figu re 5 NWI Mapped Wetlands Port Quendall Termina l Natura l Resource and Hab itat Assess ment Report a, ! ~ ~ i g to ~ ~ "' g 9 ..J -;t_ Cl z w ::) a d, "' ! 1l 0 :;:i >( DRAFT 100-Ft Buffer Property Line HORIZONTAL DATUM : Washington State Plane North, NAD83/91. VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD8 8 0 0 Figure 6 Vegetative Cover Port Quendall Terminal Natural Resource and Habitat Assessment Report .... (!) u: (JI ~ ij n. ~ ~ g "' 9 g "' 0 0 <O 9 ....I ....I < Cl z w ::> 0 d, "' 0 0 <O 0 ] 0 ?. "' C ~ "O ·~ '8 E ~ ~ 0 8 N .; 0 a. ., (J) DRAFT LEGEND : Wetland Location and Designation Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) Property Line HORIZONTAL DATUM : Washington State Plane North, NAD83/9 1. VERTICAL DATUM : N AVD88 0 0 150 Sca l e in Feet Figure 7 Wetland an d OHWM Del ineation Results Port Que nd a ll T e rmi nal Natural Res ou rce and Hab itat Asse ss ment Report ·.; ...: X 8. ~ -g "' -' .; "O a:; :, 0 1S w Cl'. w a z w Cl'. 6 :i: a. ~ (.'.J c .Q s ~ Cl'. " .5 .; _g "' ~ E " E ~ E w .; "2 ., ~ :::j .,, C ·;;; § ~ t ~ g ~ ·o i ~ "' 8 N <-i a. " "' AO~ ~~~· t~t{, # ~ 'ft. ANQEAC~ ~ ~ , , / / ~~+".r. ... :_S1!.:. ~ &= I / '/ I I / J!I ~ ,' / ,JI .... ~ ~ /f •'/ ~-I ~ ~ LEGEND : .. r L ,. - ... EXISTING SHORELINE ORDINARY HIG H WATER MARK {OHWM) EXISTING SHORELIN E ORDINARY LOW WATER MARK {OLWM) EXISTING WETLAND TO REMAIN EX ISTING WETLAND TO BE FILLED FOR REMEDIAT ION (TO BE PERFORMED UNDER CERCLA) PROSP ECT IVE WETLAND CREATION/ RESTORATION FOR CERCLA REMEDIATION SHOR ELINE SO-FT SETBACK (PER CITY OF RENTON SHORELINE CODE) PROSPECTIVE SHORELINE SETBACK, 100-FT AVERAGE WIDTH PROSP ECT IVE RIPARIAN HABITAT RESTORAT IO N AREA, WORK TO BE PREFORMED UNDER SEPERATE AGREEMENT PROSPECTIVE WETLAND CREATION / RESTORATION BUFFER FOR CERCLA REMEDIAT IO N HORIZONTAL DATUM : Washington State Plane North, NAD83/91. VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD88 () 0 160 Scale in Feet Figure 8 Shoreline Restoration Conceptual Design Port Quendall Terminal APPENDIX A PLAN VIEW AND CROSS SECTIONS OF WETLANDS A THROUGH H / / / / / /, / / / I / / I I / ! \ ) [] CJ a: LEGEND: t .. 9 Wetland location ~ j Wetland Flag location ill ~ -· · -· · -· · -Oridinary High Water Mark " (OHWM) tA A} Cross Section location and Designation -----Property line Test Plot Location () 0 40 I I ! HORIZONTAL DATUM: Washington State Plane North, NAD83/91. ll VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD88 ~~======================================~ Scale 1n Feet ffi => I A ii 25 u. - .S ~ 20 c: a a> ~ ~ 15 ::,- QJ u} --- 0 Existing s rf u ace I -- -- i-Wetland A --J A' \. ' OHWM .. . . .. _._ .. ··-' I i 40 80 Horizontal Distance in Feet 0 20 Scale in Feet Figure A-1 Wetland A Port Quendall Terminal Natural Resource and Habitat Assessment Report I /-------~ ...... i ' \,~.~--~"~/ ~---------------------------------------~ LEGEND: l .. ~-~I Wetland Location ~ 'f r Wetland Flag Location ft I -· · -· · -· · -Oridinary High Water Mark ~ Test Plot Location ~ , t B B ~ Cross Section Location and Designation ---Property Line ~ (OHWM) 0 40 I HORIZONTAL DATUM: Washington State Plane North, NAD83/91. i I -VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD88 Scale m Feet 3~===============================' ~ w :, i oo B i §! 30 -g ..: ii! ~25 ., [i & 20 ~ ·~ 15 L 1 1l ~ !l! ro ~ 0 ~ w ~ ' Wetland B I I I '- f~-- ' r Existing Surface I I ' • I I OHWM I . .Y-:-:- i I J ' ] •u Horizontal Distance in Feet 0 20 I I Scale in Feet Figure A-2. Wetland B Port Quendall Terminar Natural Resource and Habitat Assessment Report ) i / I / / / / / I , ' I / / / I / I ! - ----- v / / / ./ Wetland Location Wetland Flag Locatlon t C Cj' Cross Section Location and Designation -----Property Line () -30 ., ~-25 .5 ~ a~ w ',i:i <t: ~ ~15 ., w C -J Wetland C - 0 I'll Test Plot Location 0 40 Ex"st' Surface ; I 1ng C r 11 --............_ OHWM .. ··--··- ------:'-:;::"--. -. -·· -----40 80 Horizontal Distance in Feet 0 20 ' ' Scale in Feet FigureA-3 Wetland C Port Quendall Terminal Natural Resource and Habitat Assessment Report / :t ,~ .. .. ll.....-'--\..L..<l._ _____ _s. ___ ___l_l ____ _,, ~ LEGEND: ; -i --Wetland Location ~ j Wetland Flag Location ~ -· · -• · -·, -Oridinary High Water Mark ~ (OHWM) lli •DD'• Cross Section Location and ~ L ,_I Designation ! ~----;;--P~r-op_e_rty_L-in_e _____ _ !'ii Test Plot location HORIZONTAL DATUM: Washington State Plane North, NAD83/91. VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD88 Wetland D -----------i () 0 I Scale in Feet D' I> I : :c::=_ --=-=:--=-~11=--=·-_ :::::~1==_=_=_=1_,_=_"f_,~_=::_=_=1_,_J=:_=:_=:_~~;::-~-1-;;::.:;:;;. -;;::.~~I!:WM:.:_;·. ~=!--~ .. L _ _ Existing ~~rface _ L ;l!/ 0 ----40 80 ----~-----1~2-0~ Horizontal Distance In Feet 0 20 Scale In Feet j 40 I I I Figure A~· Wetland D Port Quendall Termina: Natural Resource and Habitat Assessment Repor1 I I ' / I I / I I I / I I I c..------I / / WF-10 \ / / / ~ -=c-.::-· --a ; "'~----------------------------------------~ "' c: LEGEND: I ;! I l Wetland Location i. i Wetland Flag Location ~ -· · -· · -· · -Oridinary High Water Mark ~ (OHWM) t. E E j Cross Section Location and Designation ------Property Line l'il Test Plot Location 0 0 40 I ' - i'c HORIZONTAL DATUM: Washington State Plane North, NAD83/91. ~ VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD88 ~~========================================~ Seale In Feet w ; w I -!l i co E co Cl ~ 30 I ;i----Wetland E ' l Existing s 1 urface I T ------. : 25 ,f--1-----+---~ 20 f--------r-----+-------+--:i 15~~--t- ~ 0 'gj i . . ! I I -I- "' w 40 80 120 Horizontal Distance in Feet 0 I 20 Scale in Feet I Figure A-5 Wetland E Port Quendall Terminal Natural Resource and Habitat Assessment Report \.___/ -- r:,"-o~ o~~-1 .;-~ ~'?-', t ~<,, \T l 1 l j_ j \ ~ :wetlands! :l, _______________________________ _ ~ LEGEND: t ~ Wetland Location cl. '.\' r Wetland Flag Location J -· · -· · -· · -Oridinary High Water Mark ~ (OHWM) tF Fj Cross Section Location and Designation ------Property line Test Plot Location 1 n j_ i HORIZONTAL DATUM: Washington State Plane North, NAD83/91. I VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD88 0 40 Existing S rf u ace- t 25 ., u.- .s ~20 §> ~ ~ 15 >-., w F ,------ I 0 Scale in Feet l -i Wetland F I-F l I --,.__ OHWM I .. •• ....JL. •• - 40 Horizontal Distance in Feet l 0 20 I I Scale in Feet l Figure A-E Wetland F Port Quendall Terminar Natural Resource and Habitat Assessment Report ~ ... ~ 5 ill ---- Wetland Location Wetland Flag Location 8 -· · -· · -· · -Ori di nary High Water Mark ~ (OHWM) a! ----.! L ------------------ t. G Gj Cross Section Location and Designation -----Property Line Test Plot Location () 0 40 13 HORIZONTAL DATUM: Washington State Plane North, NAD83/91. ~ VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD88 ~!:=======================================~ Scale In Feet z w ; i <' Existing Surface G -:E 35 ---j Wetland G I-G' u.. --~ 130 I i ~ 25 ~-----==--===±:::=====i=:::::::=---------1 w o!.------~-----4-1.0.---------~ Horizontal Distance in Feet 0 20 Scale in Feet Figure A-7 Wetland G Port Quendall Terminal Natural Resource and Habitat Assessment Report I I I Ol I \ " l '-'--. -- l J_ : _________________________________ _ ~ LEGEND: ! ~ ~ "T I Wetland Flag Location I -· · -· · -· · -Oridinary High Water Mark ~ (OHWM) Wetland Location t H H j Cross Section Location and Designation ------Property Line l'il Test Plot Location l n l i HORIZONTAL DATUM: Washington State Plane North, NAD83/91. iil VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD88 0 40 I Scale In Feet I "Ji__ ________________________________________ _, ~,-----------------------------------------~ ffi => i i ~ x H I-Wetland H -i j 25 u.-c: 00 ·-~20 §> +:: <t 15 «>Z >-., w i ,___.__ 0 i 40 E .. s rf J. r x,st,ng u ace H -,-__ OHWM .•. ,,_ l i --80 Horizontal Distance in Feet l 0 20 Scalem Feet l Figure A-ll Wetland H Port Quendall Terminar Natural Resource and Habitat Assessment Report ~~===============================~ "' a: LEGEND: t ~ ~ ~ ~ r Wetland Location Wetland Flag location g -· · -· · -· · -Oridinary High Water Mark ~ (OHWM) t I I 'j Cross Section Location and Designation ------Property Line Test Plot Location 0 () 40 I HORIZONTAL DATUM: Washington State Plane North, NAD83/91. -, ....:V-=E:..:.RT:..:.ICA::..::L....:D.:..A:..:.TU.:..M~: N....:A....:V-=D.::.88:.._ ___________________________ __J ~- I I Scale in Feet c,:r---------------------------------------, ffi f-----Wetland 1---- 1 C I 1l E ! ~ Property Line~ t 35~--~-------.-1 I 1 ~ 30'1 CTjl I' 'E <C2 25 ------j----J -'rj: ~ _ J =-1Existing :u_rf_ac_e_,__ ___ __., ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 Scale in Feet 20 Figure A-9 Wetland I Port Quendall Terminal Natural Resource and Habitat Assessment Report !l LEGEND: ! I ~ L-_...JI Wetland Location Wetland Flag Location 8 -· · -· · -· · -Oridinary High Water Mark ~ (OHWM) I I I I t J J :.t Cross Section Location and Designation ----Property Line Test Plot Location I HORIZONTAL DATUM: Washington State Plane North, NAD83/91. 0 t I I I I 0 !:! VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD88 ~L_ _________________________________ ...::.:...::__ ~c------------------------------------- Scale In Feet 1 !'--Property Line I '$ 1-1---l-l -Wetland J ~ gg 301 I 40 g~2s•~.====-.JL~-======:r.___ ·~ ~ ' >---- .!!! 0 w 0 Scale In Feet 80 20 L L L l l .l I / .l l 1 50 I l J l J FigureA-U Wetland I Port Quendall Terrnina· Natural Resource and Habitat Assessment Repon APPENDIX B ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK FLAG LOCATIONS Match line to Figure B-2 V Property Line LEGEND: . • i Shoreline Flag Location Wetland Location -· • -· · -• • -Oridinary High Water Mark (OHWM) ------Property Line DRAFT HORIZONTAL DATUM: Washington State Plane North, NAD83/91. VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD88 0 0 80 Scale in Feet Figure 8-1 Ordinary High Water Mark Flag Locations -South Port Quendall Terminal Natural Resource and Habitat Assessment Report / / / •• LEGEND: i Shoreline Flag Location l>,:9'.;~l'h\! Wetland Location -• • -• • -• • -Oridinary High Water Mark (OHWM) ----Property Line DRAFT HORIZONTAL DATUM: Washington State Plane North, NAD83/91. VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD88 n 0 80 I I Scale in Feet Figure B-2 Ordinary High Water Mark Flag Locations -North Port Quendall Terminal Natural Resource and Habitat Assessment Report APPENDIX C SAMPLE PLOT SUMMARY DATA Appendix C -Sample Plot Summary Data Table C-1 Plant Species Observed During the Investigation Scientific Name Common Name Trees A/nus rubra Red alder Arbutus menziesii Pacific Mardone Papu/us balsamifera Black cottonwood Salix lasiandra Pacific willow Salix scouleriana Scouler willow Shrubs Camus sericea Red-osier dogwood Cytisus scoparius Scot's broom Fraxinus latifalia Oregon ash lonicera involucrata Black twin berry Oemlerio cerasiformis Indian plum Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry Rubus parvif/orus Thimbleberry Rubus spectabilis Salmonberry Sambucus racemosa Red elderberry Spiraea douglasii Spirea Ferns & Herbaceous Athyrium filix-femino Lady fern Carex obnupto Slough sedge Convolvu/us arvensis Field bindweed Epilobium ciliatum Purple-leaved willowherb Equisetum arvense Field horsetail Galium aparine Catchweed bedstraw Geranium robertianum Robert geranium Impatiens sp. Touch-me-not Iris pseudacorus Yellow flag iris Hedera helix English ivy Lemna minor Small duckweed Lycopus americanus American bugleweed Juncus effusus Soft rush Phalaris arundinacea Reed canarygrass Plantago major Common plantain Polygonum cuspidatum Japanese knotweed Polystichum munitum Sword fern Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Quendall Tenninal C-1 Indicator Status 1 FAC NL FAC FACW FAC FACW NL FACW FAC FACU FACU FAC FAC FACU FACW FAC OBL NL FACW FAC FACU NL FACW OBL UPL OBL OBL FACW FACW FACU FACU FACU September 2009 060059-01 Appendix C -Sample Plot Summa,ry Data Scientific Name Common Name Indicator Status 1 Ronunculus repens Creeping buttercup FACW Rumex crispus Curly dock FAC Tonocetum vu/gore Common tansy NL Taroxacum officionale Common dandelion FACU Trifolium repens White clover FAC Typha latifolia Common cattail OBL Notes: These categories, referred to as the "wetland indicator status" (from the wettest to driest habitats) are as follows: obligate wetland (OBL) plants, facultatlve wetland (FACW) plants, facultative (FAC) plants, facultative upland (FACU) plants, and obligate upland (UPL) plants. TableC-2 Summary of Wetland Sample Plot Vegetation Data WeUand Sample Scientific Name Common Name Plot A/nus rubro (tree stratum) Red alder Cornus sericeo Red-osier dogwood A/nus rubro (shrub stratum Red alder A Wet Lonicero invo/ucroto Black twinberry Rubus porviflorus Thimbleberry Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry Iris pseudacorus Yellow flag iris Convolvulus arvensis Field bindweed Hedero helix English ivy A/nus rubra Red alder Rubus ormenlacus Himalayan blackberry A Up Oemlerio cerosiformis Indian plum Equisetum orvense Field horsetail B Wet Populus bolsomifero Black cottonwood Salix lasiondra Pacific willow B Up No vegetation Present C Wet Polygonum cuspidatum Japanese knotweed Salix /osiandra Pacific willow Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry Juncus effusus Soft rush Epi/obium ciliotum Purple-leaved willowherb Rumex crispus Curly dock Wetland and Ordina,ry High Water Mark Delineation Report Qµendall Terminal C-2 Indicator Status' FAC FACW FAC FAC FAC FACU OBL NL UPL FAC FACU FACU FAC FAC FACW FACU FACW FACU FACW FACW FAC Cover% 100% 20% 10% 10% 10% 5% 5% 5% 5% 75% 35% 20% 1% 25% 25% 65% 10% 5% 50% 25% 5% September 2009 060059-01 Appendix C -Sample Plot Summary Data Wetland Sample Scientific Name Common Name Plot Lycopus americanus American bugleweed Lemna minor Small duckweed Convo/vulus arvensis Field bindweed Trifolium repens White clover Polygonum cuspidatum Japanese knotweed C Up Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry Populus balsamifera Black cottonwood Salix lasiandra Pacific willow Cornus sericea Red-osier dogwood D 1Wet Lon/cera involucrata Black twin berry Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry Plantago major Common plantain A/nus rubra Red alder Camus sericea Red-osier dogwood Rubus spectabilis Salmon berry D 2Wet Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry Iris pseudacorus Yellow flag iris Epilobium ciliatum Purple-leaved willowherb Phalaris arundinacea Reed canarygrass Black cottonwood (tree Popu/us ba/samifera stratum) Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry D Up Black cottonwood (shrub Popu/us balsamifera stratum) Epilobium ci/iatum Purple-leaved willowherb Salix /asiandro Pacific willow E Wet Popu/us ba/samifera Black cottonwood Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry Popu/us balsamifera Black cottonwood Lonicera involucrata Black twinberry Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry E Up Cornus sericeo Red-osier dogwood Epi/obium ciliatum Purple-leaved willowherb Hedera helix English ivy Rubus spectabi/is Salmon berry F Wet A/nus rubra Red alder Salix fasiandra Pacific willow Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Quendall Tenninal C-3 Indicator Status 1 OBL OBL NL FAC FACU FACU FAC FACW FACW FAC FACU FACU FAC FACW FAC FACU OBL FACW FACW FAC FACU FAC FACW FACW FAC FACU FAC FAC FACU FACW FACW UPL FAC+ FAC FACW Cover% 5% 5% 5% 5% 80% 20% 75% 15% 10% 5% 5% 5% 5% 100% 25% 5% 5% 90% 10% 5% 75% 15% 10% 5% 15% 5% 5% 50% 15% September 2009 060059-01 Appendix C -Sample Plot Summary Data Wetland Sample Scientific Name Common Name Plot Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry Populus balsamifera Black cottonwood Juncus effusus Soft rush Phalaris arundinacea Reed canarygrass Iris pseudacorus Yellow flag Iris Ga/ium aparine Catchweed bedstraw Plantago major Common plantain Rumex crispus Curly dock Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry F Up Po/ygonum cuspidatum Japanese knotweed Epilobium ciliatum Purple-leaved willowherb Salix lasiandra Pacific willow A/nus rubra Red alder G Wet Cornus serlceo Red-osier dogwood Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry Polygonum cuspidatum Japanese knotweed Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry G Up Polygonum cuspidatum Japanese knotweed Popu/us balsamifera Black cottonwood A/nus rubra Red alder Salix lasiandra Pacific willow Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry Spiraea douglasii Spirea Lonicera involucrata Black twinberry H Wet luncus effusus Soft rush Phalaris arundinacea Reed canarygrass Equisetum arvense Field horsetail Rumex crispus Curly dock Ranunculus repens Creeping buttercup Convolvulus arvensis Field bindweed Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry Pholoris orundinacea Reed canarygrass H Up Equisetum arvense Field horsetail Polygonum cuspidatum Japanese knotweed Tanacetum vu/gore Common tansy I Wet Camus sericea Red-osier dogwood Polygonum cuspidatum Japanese knotweed Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qpendall Terminal C-4 Indicator Status' FACU FAC FACW FACW OBL FACU FACU FAC FACU FACU FACW FACW FAC FACW FACU FACU FACU FACU FAC FAC FACW FACU FACW FAC FACW FACW FAC FAC FACW NL FACU FACW FAC FACU NL FACW FACU Cover% 15% 10% 35% 25% 10% 10% 5% 5% 15% 60% 5% 60% 20% 20% 10% 5% 25% 60% 40% 20% 20% 10% 15% 15% 10% 10% 5% 5% 5% 5% 25% 40% 10% 10% 10% 60% 25% September 2009 060059-01 Appendix C -Sample Plot Summary Data Wetland Sample Scientific Name Common Name Indicator Cover% Plot Status 1 Salix lasiandra Pacific willow FACW 15% Epilobium cillatum Purple-leaved willowherb FACW 5% I Up Po/ygonum cuspidatum Japanese knotweed FACU 100% So/ix lasiandra Pacific willow FACW 15% Rub us armeniacus Himalayan blackberry FACU 10% J Wet Phalaris arundinacea Reed canarygrass FACW 100% Rubus ormeniacus Himalayan blackberry FACU 15% A/nus rubra Red alder FAC 10% J Up Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry FACU 80% Phaloris orundinacea Reed canarygrass FACW 15% Notes: These categories, referred to as the "wetland indicator status" (from the wettest to driest habitats) are as follows: obligate wetland (OBL) plants, facultatlve wetland (FACW) plants, facultative (FAC) plants, facultative upland (FACU) plants, and obligate upland (UPL) plants. Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineadon Report. Quendall Terminal · · C-5 September 2009 060059-01 Appendix C -Sample Plot Summary Data Table C-3 Summary of Wetland Sample Plot Hydrology Data Wetland Sample Hydrology Plot A Wet Saturation at surface and freestanding water in pit at 10 inches A Up Saturation at surface and freestanding water in pit at 15 inches Soll pit not excavated. Constructed stormwater feature with B Wet standing water present. B Up Soil pit not excavated. Soil pit not excavated. Constructed stormwater feature with c. Wet standing water present. C Up Soil pit not excavated. No evidence of hydrology. D 1Wet No saturation or freestanding water in pit to 18 inches D 2Wet Saturation at surface and freestanding water at surface D Up Saturation at surface, no freestanding water in pit to 18 inches Soil pit not excavated. Constructed stormwater feature with E Wet standing water present. E Up Soil pit not excavated. No evidence of hydrology. No saturation at surface, freestanding water in pit at 11 inch F Wet inches F Up Soil pit not excavated. No evidence of hydrology. Soil pit not excavated. Constructed stormwater feature with G Wet standing water present. G Up Soil pit not excavated. No evidence of hydrology. H Wet Soil pit excavated. Standing water at surface. H Up No soil pit excavated no visible evidence of hydrology. I Wet Saturation at surface, no freestanding water in pit to 18 inches I Up Saturation at surface, no freestanding water in pit to 18 inches J Wet Saturation at surface and freestanding water at surface J Up Saturation at surface, no freestanding water In pit to 18 inches Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineadon Report September 2009 060059-01 QuendaU Terminal C-6 Appendix C -Sample Plot Summary Data Table C-4 Summary of Wetland Sample Plot Soils Data Wetland Sample Soil Horizon Matrix Color Red ox Color Redox Texture Plot (inches) Abundance (%) Oto 10 lOYR 3/1 None None Clay loam A Wet 10-18 lOYR 3/2 None None Clay Loam 18+ 2.SY 3/1 10YR% 5% Clay loam Dto8 lOYR 3/1 None None Clay loam A Up 8 to 18+ lOYR 3/1 10YR4/3 15% Sand B Wet B Up Due to known contamination, soil pits not excavated C Wet C Up Due to known contamination, soil pits not excavated o to 6 10YR3/2 None None Sandy loam D lWet Silt loam, gravel 6 to 18+ 10YR 5/1 10YR4/6 10% interspersed at 6 to 8 Oto 10 lOYR 2/1 None None D 2Wet lOto 12 2.5YR4/1 10YR4/6 25% 12 to 18+ 2.SY 4/1 None None D Up Oto 18+ 2.SY 5/2 None None E Wet E Up Due to known contamination, soil pits not excavated F Wet Oto6 2.SY 4/2 lOYR 5/6 20% 6to 18+ 2.5Y 4/1 lOYR 4/6 40% F Up Due to known contaminants, soil pits not excavated G Wet G Up Due to known contaminants, soil pits not excavated H Wet H Up Due to known contamination, soil pits not excavated Oto6 10YR 3/1 None None I Wet 6to 12 lOYR 3/2 2.SYR 4/6 15% 10YR 6/8 50% 12 to 18 5Y4/2 2.Sy 4/2 25% Oto8 10YR 3/3 None None I Up 8to 18 10YR 3/3 7.SYR 5/8 5% 0 to 3 Root mat None None J Wet 3 to 18 10YR 3/1 None None J Up a to 18 10YR4/2 None None Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qpendall Terminal C-7 inches. Loamy sand loamy sand Sand Loamy clay Sand Sand Loam loam Silty loam loam loam organic Silty loam Silty loam September 2009 060059-01 Appi!ndix C -Sample Plot Summary Data Table C-5 Summary of Wetland Sample Plot Data and Wetland Determination Wetland Sample Vegetation Solis Plot A Wet Hydrophytic Hydric A Up Non-hydrophytic Hydric B Wet Hydrophytlc N/A B Up None N/A C Wet Hydrophytic N/A C Up Non-hydrophytlc N/A D lWet Hydrophytic Hydric D 2Wet Hydrophytic Hydric D Up Non-hydrophytic Non-hydric E Wet Hydrophytic N/A E Up Hydrophytic N/A F Wet Hydrophytic Hydric F Up Non-hydrophytic N/A G Wet Hydrophytlc N/A G Up Non-hydrophytic N/A H Wet Hydrophytic N/A H Up Non-hydrophytic N/A I Wet Hydrophytic Hydric I Up Non-hydrophytic Non-hydric J Wet Hydrophytic Hydric J Up Non-hydrophytic Non-hydric Wedand and Ordinary High· Water Mark Delineation Report Quendall Terminal C-8 Hydrology Positive Positive Positive Negative Positive Negative Positive Positive Positive Positive Negative Positive Negative Positive Negative Positive Negative Positive Negative Positive Negative Detennination Wetland Upland Wetland Upland Wetland Upland Wetland Wetland Wetland Wetland Upland Wetland Upland Wetland Upland Wetland Upland Wetland Upland Wetland Upland September 2009 060059-01 APPENDIX D FIELD DATA SHEETS WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Sile: Quendall Terminals Applicant/Owner: Quendall lnvestigator(s): A. Gala. J. Purs~y Landfonn (hilrslope. lcrrace, etc.): lakefringe Subregion (LRR): A Lal: 47.53N Soil Map Unit Name: Norma sandy loam City/County: Renton/King Sampling Date: State; WA Sampling Point: Seclion, Township, Range: 29/24N/5E Local relief (concave, convex. none): None Long: 122.20W Datum: 04/23/2009 Wet A SP#1Up Slope(%): Oto 2 NW! classification: None mapped Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the sile typical for this time of year? Yes No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Arc Vegetation 0, Soil D, o, Hydrology D, significantly disturbed? Are ·Norma.I ClrcumstancesM present? Yes 1?D No D Are V4?9etation D, Soil D, Or Hydrology D, naturally problamatic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locatlons1 transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes D No 181 Hydric Soil Present? Yes 181 No D Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 181 No D Remarks: Data plot includes wetland hydrology and soils, but laeklng In hydrophytlc vegetation. VEGETATION -Use scientific names of olants Tree Stratum (Plot Size: 30 foot radius) 1. Alnus rubra 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size; 15 foot radius) 5. Rubus armeniacus 6. Oelmerla ceraslformis 7. 8. 9. Absolute ~ 75 35 20 Oominant ~ Yes Indicator Status FAC 75 = Total Cover Yes Yes FACU FACU 55 = Total Coo.;er Dominance Test Worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FAC:W, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Arc DBL, FACW, or FAC: Prevalence Index worksheet: Total% Cover of: 0BL species 0 FACW species 1 FAC species 75 FACU species 55 UPL species Yes D No 181 1 (A) 3 (B) 33% (A/8) Mulli!ID!:b:!f x1 = 0 x2 = 2 x3 = 22S x4 = 220 x5 = Herb Stratum (Plot Size: 3 foot radius) 10. Equlsetum arvense No FACW Column Tolals: 131 (A) 447 (B) 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 1 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size: ) 1. 2. = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 99% Prevalence lOOex = B/A = 3.41 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: No No Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is ::,3.0 1 Morphological Adaptations, (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plan ls 1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) '.Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic. Vegetation Present? Yes D No Remarks: 33% dominant wetland vegetation per the Dominance test and Prevalence index < 3. HydrophytiC vegetation not present. . US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valley, and Coast -interim Ver.sion Project Site: Qu&ndal1 Terminal SOIL Samnllnn Point: Wet A SP#1Un Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicator$-) I Depth Matrix Redcx. ~eatures (inches) Color{moist} % Color {Moist) % Type 1 Loc 2 Texture Remarks ------- 0108 10YR3/1 100 None None None None Clay loam a to 18+ 10YR3/1 85 10YR4/3 15% D M Clay loam 1rype: C= Concentration, D=Deplelion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydrie Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric So\ls3 : D Histosol (A1) D Sandy Redox ($5) D 2 an Mucl< (A10) D Histic Epipedon (A2) D Stripped Matrix (S6) D Red Parent Material (TF2) D Black Histic (A3) D Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) D Loe my Gleyed Matnx (F2) liJI Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) D Depleted Matrix {F3) liJI Thick Dark Surface (A 12) D Redox Dark Surtace (F6) D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) D Depleted Dark Surfaco (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytlc vegetation and wetland D Sandy Gleyed Matnx (S4) D Redox Depressions (F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or ......... blematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth (Inches}; Hydric Soils Present? Yes liJI No D Remarl<s: 1 chroma with redox features. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology JncUcators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) D Surtace Water (A1) liJI Water-Stained Leevea (B9) D Water-Stained Leaves (89) ~ High Water Tabte (A2) (except MLRA 1, ,:, 4A, and 48) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, end 48) liJI Saturation (A3) D Salt Crust (811) D Drainage Patterns (810) D Water Marks {81} D Aquatic Invertebrates (813) D Dry-season Water Table (C2) D Sediment Deposits (82) D Hydrogen SulfKte Odor (C1) D Saturation Vislble on Aerial Imagery (C9) liJI Dnft Depos;ts (B3) D Oxidized Rhizosphercs along Living Rools (C3) D Geomorphic Position (D2) D Algal Mat or Crust (B4) D Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) D Shallow Aquilard (03) D Iron Deposits (BS) D Recent Iron Reduction in TIiied Soils (C6) D FAC-Nautral Test (D5) D Surface Soil Cracks (86) D Stunted or Stresses Plants (D1} (LRR A) D Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) D Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) D other (Explain In Remarks) D Frost-Heave Hummocks (07) D Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) Reid Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes D No ~ Depth (ln-ches): Waler Table Present? Yes liJI No D Depth (indles): 15inches Saturation Present? Yes liJI No D Depth ~nches), At surface Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ~ No D (indudes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remafks: Saturation and standing water obseMKl in sample plot US Anny Ccrps of Engineers We stem Mounl8ins, Valley, and Coo st-Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: Applicant/Owner: lnvestigatol'(s): Quendall Terminals Quendall A. Gale, J. Pursley Landform (hi!Jstope, terrace, etc.): Lakefringe Lat: Subregion (LRR): A Soil Map Unit Name: Norma sandy loam 47.53N City/County: Renton/King Sampling Date: State: WA Sampllng Point: Section, Township, Range: 29/24N/5E Local relief (concave, con'o'ax, none): None Long: 122.20W Datum: 04/23/2009 WetA SP#1Wet Slope (%): 0 to 2 NWI classification: None mapped Are climatic I hydrologic conditions 011 the site typical for this time of year? Yes Are Vegetation D, Soil D, Or Hydrology D, signiflcanlly disturbed? AreVegets.tion D, Soil D. OrHydrology D. nalurallyproblematic? 181 No D (Jf rm, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.) Ye, [i!J No D SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations. transects, Important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 181 No D Hydric Soil Present? Yes 181 No D Is the Sampling Area within a WeUand? Yes ti!l No D Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 181 No D Remarks: Wetland A associated wtth Lake Washington; also rec.elves stonnwater runoff. Adjacent upland areas bolstered by placement of riprap materials and silt funcing. VEGETATION -Use scientific names of olants Tree Stratum (Plot Size: 30 foot radius) 1. A/nus robra 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size: 15 foot radius} 5. Camus stofonifera 6. A/nus rubra 7. Lonlcttta lnvolucrate 8. Rubus parvilloros 9. Rubus armernacus Herb $11'.Htum (Plot Size: 3 foot radius) 10. Hedera helix 11. Iris pseudacorus 12. Convolvulus arvensls 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Woody Vine Stralum (Plot Size: ) 1. 2. % Ba,e Ground in Herb Stratum 40 Absolute = 100 20 10 10 10 s 5 s 5 Dominant Species? Yes lndicalor ~ FAC 100 = Total Cover Yes FACW Yes FAC Yes FAC No FAC No FACU 55 ::.Total Cover Yes Yes Yes NL OBL NL 10 = Total Cover = Total Cover Remarks: 71% dominant wetland vegetation per the Dominance test US Army Corps of Engineers Dominance Test Worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Tolal Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Arc OBL, FACW, or FAC: Prevalence Index worksl'leet: Tqjal % Cover of: OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPl species 5 7 71 Multiply by: x1 = x2 = x3= x4= x5= IA) (B) (A/B) Column Totals: IA) Prevalence Index= 6!A ;:;: (B) Hydrophyttc; Vegetation Indicators: Yes Dominance Test is :>50% Prevalence Index is 9.01 Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular PWlts 1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 11ndicatocs of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or pr'Oblematic. Hydrophytlc Vegetation Present? Yes No Western Mountains, Valley, and Coast -lnlerim Version D Project Site: Quendall Terminal SOIL Samnlina Point; Wet A SP#1Wet Profile Description: (Descrlbe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or con fl rm the absence of indicators.} I Depth Matrix Redox Features {inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type 1 Loe' Texture Remarks ------- 0 to 10 10YR 3/1 100 None None None None Clay loam Coarse organics 10 to 18 10 YR 3/2 100 None None None None Clay roam 18+ 2.5Y 311 95 10YR% 5 RM M Clay loam 1Type: G= Concentration, D•DepleUon, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL•Pore Llning, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unl&SS otherwise noted.} Jndicatora for Problematic Hydrlc Solls3: D Hlstosol (A1) D Sandy Redox (S5) D 2 cm Muck {A10) D Hlstic Epipedon (A2) D Stripped Matrix (S6} D Red Parent Material (TF2) D Black Histic (A3) D Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1} D Other (Exptain ln Remarks) D Hydrogen Sulfide (M) D Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 181 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) D Depleted Matrix (F3) 181 Thick Dark Surface (A12) D Redox Dark Surface (F6) D Sandy Mucky MJneral (S1) D Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland D Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) D Redox Depressions (F8} hydrology must be present, unless dlstu,bed or nroblemallc. Restrictive Layer (If present): Type: Depth (Inches.}: Hydric Soils Present? Yes 181 No D Remarks: 1 chroma HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) D Surface Water {A 1} 181 Water-Stained Leavos (S9) D Water-Stained Leaves (89) 181 High Water labJe {A2} (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) 181 Saturation (A3l D SaltCrust(B11) D Drainage Patterns (B10) D Water Marks (81} D Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) D Dry-Season Water Table (C2) D Sediment Deposits (B2) D Hydrogen Sulfrde Odor (C1) D Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 181 Dnft Depos;ts (B3) D Oxkllzed Rhizoapheres along living Roots (C3) D Geomorphic Posillon (D2) D Algal Mat or Crust (84) D Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) D Shallow Aqultard (D3) D Iron Deposits (B5) D Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6} D FAC-Neutrel Test {05) D Surface Soil Cracks (86) D Stunted or Stresses Plants (D1) (LRR A) D Raised Ant Mounds (06) (LRR A) D lrtundation VISible on Aerial Imagery (87) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) D Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface {B8) Fi&fd Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes D No 181 Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes 181 No D Depth (inches): 4 inches Saturation ?resent? Yes 181 No D Depth (inches): At surface Wet~nd Hydrology Present? Yes 181 No D (Includes capiUary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if availabk3; Remarks: Saturation and standing water observed in sample plot US Army Corps of Enf}Meat'S Western Mountains, Vaf/ey, and Coast-Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: ApplicanVOWTier: 1nvesl'lgator(s}: Quendall Tenninals Ouendall City/County: Renton/King Sampling Date: State: WA Sampling Point: 04/23/2009 Wet C SP#1Up A. Gale, J Purskly Section, Township, Range: 29/24N/5E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Constructed stormwater feature Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope(%): None Subregion {LRR): A Lat 47.53N Long: 122.20W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Norma sandy roam NWI classification: None mapped 181 No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are climatic} hydrologic conditions on lhe site typical for this time of year? Yes Are Vegetation D, Soil D. Or Hydrology D, signQlCantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 181 No D Are Vegetation 0. Soil D, Or Hydrology D, naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showlng sampling point locations transects important features etc . . ' Hydrophytlc Vegetation Present? Yes D No 181 Hydri<: Soil Present? Yes D No D Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland? Yes D No 181 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes D No 181 Remarks: Sample plot localed on compacted berm adjacent and upland to Wetland C. VEGETATION -Use scientific names of nlants Tree Stratum (Plol Size: 30 foot radius) 1. 2. 3. 4. Saofinq/§hrub Stralum (Plot Size: 15 foot radius) 5. Polygonum cuspidatum 6. Rubus annenlacus 7. 8. 9. Herb Stratum (Plot Size: 3 foot radius) 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size: ) 1. 2. % Sare Ground in Herb Stratum Absolute % Cover 80 20 100 Dominant ~ Indicator Status 100 = Total Cover Y(ts FACU Yes FACU = Total Cover =Total Co~r = Total CQver Remarks: Hydrophytic vcgclalioo not present in sample plot location. US Army Cotps of Engineers Dominance Test Worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Aro OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strala: Percent of Dominant Species That Are 0Bl, FACW, Of FAC: Prevalence Index worksheet: Total% Cover of: OBL species FACNV species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = BIA= Hydrophytlc Vegetation Indicators: Yes Dominance Test is :>50% Prevalence [ndex is ~3.01 0 (A) 2 (B) (NB) MultiQl:ib:i· x1 = x2 = x3= x4.: XS= (8) Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non·Vascular Plants 1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 11ndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology musl be present, unless disturbed or problematic. · Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes D No Western Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Veraian Project Site: Quendall Tenninal SOIL Samnlinn Point: Wet C SP#1Wet ProfUe Ooscription: {Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) I Depth Matrix Redox. Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type1 Loe' Texlure Remarks ------- 1Type: C= Concentration, O:;;:Depfetion, RM=R.educed Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Gtains. 2Location: PL:;;:Pore Lining, M:;Matrix Hydr1c Soll Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for ProblemaUc Hydric Sollsl: D Histosol (A1) D Sandy Redox (S5) D 2 cm Muck (A10) D Hlstic Epipedon (A2) D Stripped Matrix (S6) D Red Parent Material (TF2} D Black Hlstic {A3} D Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Hydrogen Sulfide {A4) D loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) D Depleted Matrix (F3) D Thick Dark Surface {A12) D Redox Dark Surface (FB) D Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) D Depleted Dark Surface (F7) alndicators of hydropt,ytic vegetation and wetland D Sandy Gteyed Matrix ($4) D Redox Depressions (F8) hydrology must be present. unless disturbed or nroblematic. Restrictive Layer (If present): Type: Depth (Inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes !ill No D Remarks: Due to known contaminants in the study area, soil pits were not excavated in some areas. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrotogy Indicator&! Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that appCy) Seronda,y Indicators {2 or more required) D Surface Water (A1) D Water-Stained Leaves (B9) D Water-Stained Leaves (89) D High Water Table {A2} (except MLRA 1. 2, 4A. and 48) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) D Saturation (A3} D Sat! Crust (B11) D Drainage Patterns (610) D Water Marks (B1) D Aquatic Invertebrates (B1J} D Dry.season Water Table (C2) D Sediment DeJ)OSits (B2) D Hydrogen sumde Odor (C1) D Saturation Visible on Aerial tmagecy (C9) D Drift Deposits (B3) D Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) D Geomorphic Position (02) D Algal MatorCrust(B4) D Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) D Shallow Aquitard (D3) D Iron Deposits (BS) D Recent !ton Reduction in Tilled Soils (CG) D FAC-Neutral Test (05} D Surface Soil Cracks (86) D Stunted or Stresses Plants (D1) (LRR A) D Raised Ant Mounds (06) (LRR A) D Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) D other (Explain in Remarks) D Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) D Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS) Field Observations.: Surface Water Present? Yes D No !ill Depth (inches); Watef Table Present? Yes D No !ill Depth (Inches): 4 inches Saturation Preaent? Yes D No !ill Depth (inches}: At surface WeUand Hydrology Present? Yes D No !ill (includes capillary fringe) Describe Reeordecl Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, pmvlous fnspections), if available: Remarks: Sample plot located on compacted berm adjacent to Wetland C; no evidence of wettand hydrology. US Nmy Corps of En~ers Western Mountains. Valley, and Coast-Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: ApplicanVOwner: lnvestigator(s): Quendall Tennfnals Quendall City/County: Renton/King State: WA Sampling Date: Sampling Point: 04/23/2009 WetB SP#1Wet A. Gale, J. Pursley Section, Township, Range: 29124N/5E Landform (hilfslope, terr1:1ce, etc.): Constructed stoffilwater feature Local relief (concave, convt!x, none); Concave Slope(%): None Subregion (LRR): A Lat: 47.53N Soil Map Unit Name: Norma sandy loam Are climatic/ tiydrorogic Conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Are Vegetation D, Soil D. Or Hydrology D. significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation D, Soil D. Or Hydrology D. naturally problematic? Long: 122.20W Datum: NWI classification: 0 No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are ~Normal Circumstances~ present? (Jf needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach sfte map showing sampling polnt locations transects Important features etc . . . Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No D Hydrie Sail Present? Yes D No D le the Sampling Area within a Wetland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes lill No D None mapped Yes 181 Na Yes 0 No Remarks: Wetland C is a constructed stormwater feature that receives stormwater runoff from the property. Does not appear to be maintained. VEGETATION-Use scientific names of nlants Tree Stratum (Plot Size: 30 foot rad[us) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub stratum (Plot Size: 15 foot radius) 5. Polygonum cusp/datum 6. Salix laslrllldra 7. Rubus armenlacus 8. 9. Herb Stratum (Plat Size: 3 foot radius) Absolule % Cover 65 10 5 Dominant ~ = Total Cover Indicator Status Yes FACU Yes No FACW FACU 80= Total Cover Dominance Test Worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Ara OBL, FAON, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species A<::ross All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Prevalence lndex worksheet: Tgjal % Covergf: 4 4 100 MuffiDIY bv: x.1 = x2 = x3= x4= x5= D D (A) (B) (A/B) 10. Juncus effusus 50 Yes FACW OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column Totals: (A) (B) 11. Epilobium c11/atum 12. Rumex crispus 13. Lycopus amerlcanus 14. Lemna minor 15. Trllolfum repens 16. Convolvulus arvens/s 17. 18. 19. 20. Woody Vine Stratum {Plot Size: ) 1, 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 1 O -~ 25 Yes FACW 5 No Obi 5 No Oib 5 No Obl -c::. 5 No FAC 5 No NL 100= Total Caver = Total Coy,er Remarks; 100% dominant wetland vegetation per the Dominance test. US Army Corps of Eng/ooers Prevalence Index= BIA = Hydrophytlc Vegetation Indicators: Yes Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is 9.01 Morphologlcal Adap1a1ions 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vaswlar Plants 1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegelalion 1 (Explain) 11ndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytle Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No Western Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Ve~n D Project Sile: Quendall Terminal SOIL Samtilina Point: Wet B SP#1Wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) I Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches} Color (moist) % Color (MoiSl) % Type1 Loe' Texture Remarks ------- 1Type: C= Concenttalion.. D=Depletlon, RM~Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydrte Soll Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Kydric Solls3 : D Histosol (A1) D Sandy Redax (S5} D 2 cm Muek (A10) D Hlslic Eplpodon (A2) D Stripped Malrix (S6} D Red Parent Material (TF2) D Black Histic (A3) D Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) D other(Explain in Remarks) D Hydrogen Suffide (A4} D Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11} D Depleted Matrix (F3) D Thick Dark Surface (A12) D Redox Dark Sul'face (F6} D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) D Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicatora of hydrophytic vegelalion and wetland D Sandy Gleyed Matrix {S4) D Redox Depressioris (FB) hydrology must be present, uoless disturbed or problematlc. Restrictive Layer (If present): Type: Deplh ~nches ): Hydric Soils Present? Yes D No D Remarks; Due to kncwm contaminants In the study area, soil pits were not excavated in some areas. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) D Surface Water (A1} D Water-stained leaves (B9) D Water·Stained Leaves {B9) 181 High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) 181 SaturaUon (A3) D Salt Crust (B11) CJ Drainage Patterns (B10) D Water Marks (81) D Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) D D,y.Season Water Table (C2) D Sediment Deposits (82) D Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) D Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) D Drift Deposits (BJ) D Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (CJ} D Geomorphic Position (D2) D Algal Mat or Crust (84} D Presence of Reducsd Iron (C4) D Shallow Aquilard (03) D Iron Deposlls (B5) D Re<:ent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (CG) D FAC·Neutral Test (D5) D Surface Soll Cracks (BB) D Stunted or Stresses Plants (D1) (LRR A) D Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) D Inundation Visible an Aerial Imagery (87) D Other (Explain ln Remarks) D Frosl·Heave Hummocks (D7) D Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) Fle!d Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes li!I No li!I Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes 181 No D Depth (inches): At surface Saturation Present? Yes 181 No D Depth (inches); At surface Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes li!I No D (Includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aeriat photos, previous Inspections), if available: Remarks; Standing water present In constructed slonnwater feature. US Army Co,ps of Engineers Westem Mountains, Va/fey, and Coasr -Interim Vel'Sion WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: fl.pplicanUOwner: Quendall Tem,inals Quendall [nvestigator(s): A. Gale, J. Pursley landform (hillsl0pe, lerrace, e1c.): Constructed stormwalef feature City/County: Rtm1on/King Sampling Date: Slale: WA Sampling Point Section, Township, Range: 29/24Nl5E 04/23/2009 Wet C SP#1Up Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope(%): None Subregion (LRR): A Lat: 4 7 .53N Long: 122.20W Dat1.Jm: Soil Map Unit Name: Norma sandy loam NWI classification: Norte mapped Are climatic I hydrologlc coflditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ~ No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation D, Soil D, Or Hydrology D, significantly disturbed'? Are "Normal Circumstances· present? Yes llll No D Ate Vegetation 0, Sail D, Or Hydrology D. naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach •~• map showing sampling point locattons transects Important features etc ' ' Hydrophytic Vegetalian Present? Yes D No llll Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes D No D Is the Sampling Area withln a Wetland? Yes D No llll Watland Hydrology Presenl? Yes D No llll Remario;s: Sample plot located on compacted din road adjacent and upland to WeUand B. VEGETATION -Use scientific names of DI ants Tree Stratum (Plot Size: 30 foot radfus) 1. 2. 3. 4. SaPling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size: 15 foot radius) 5. 6. 7. 6. 9. Herb Stratum (Plot Size: 3 foot radius) 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot Size: ) 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Absolute %Covet Remar1cs: No vegetation present in sample ptot location. us Anny Corps of Engineer.s Dominant Species? lndicalor Status 100 = Total Cover • Total Cover :::. Total Cover = Total Cover Dominance Test Woricsheet: Number of Dominant Species Thet Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: xt = x2= x3= x4= x5= (A) (8) (NB) OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index= BIA= (B) Hydrophytlc Vegetation Indicators: Ye, Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is ~3.01 Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants 1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1lndicators of hydric soil and wetrand hydrology must be present, unless cfisturbed or problematic. Hydrophytlc Vegetation Present? Yes D No We.stem Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Ver.sion Project Site: Quendall Terminal SOIL Samnlinn Point: Wet C SP#1Un Profile Description: (Describe to tho depth needed to document the Indicator or conflnn the absence of indicators.} I Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type 1 Loc2 Texture Remarks ------- 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, R_M .. Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grain a. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M::Matrix Hydric Soll lndk:ators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) tndlcators for Problematic Hydrlc Soils!: D Hlstosoi (A1) D Sandy Red<>x (SS) D 2 an Muck (A10) D Hlstic Eplpedon (A2) D Stripped Matrix (S6) D Red Parent Material {TF2) D Black Hlstic (A3) D Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1} 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) 0 Loamy Gleyed Malrix (F2) D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) D Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Thick Dark Surlace (A 12) D Redox Dafk SUrface (F6} D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) D Dep1eted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 'Netland D Sandy Gieyed Matrix (S4) 0 Redox Depressions (F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or _:._._lematic. Restrictive Layer (If present): Type: Depth (Inches): Hydrfc Soils Present? Yes 181 No D Remarks: Due to known contaminants in the study area, soil pits were nol excavated in some areas. HYDROLOGY WeU11nd Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary lndlcators (2 or more required) D Surface Water (A1) D Water-Stained leaves (89) D Water-stalned Leaves (B9) D High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) (MLRA 1, 21 4A1 and 48) 0 Saturation (A3) D Salt Crust (B 11 ) D Drainage Patterns (810) D Water Marks (81) D Aquatic lnvenebrates (B 13) D Dry-Season Water Table (C2) D Sediment Deposits (B2) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) D Saturatkm Vtsible on Aerial Imagery {C9) D Drift Deposits (83) 0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along living Roots (C3) D Geomorphlc Position (D2} D Algal Mat or Crust (84) 0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) D Shallow Aqultard (D3) D Iron Deposits (B5) D Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (CS) D FAC-Neutral lest {D5) D Suriace Soil Cracks (86) D Stunted or Stresses Plants (D1) (LRR A) D Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) D Inundation Vlslble on Aerial Imagery (B7) D Other (Explain in Remarks) 0 Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) D Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Fletd Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes D No 181 Depth (inches): Waler Table Ptesent? Yes D No 181 Depth ~nchesi 4 Inches Saturation Present? Yes D No 181 Depth (inches}: Al surface We6and Hydrology Present? Yes D No 181 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous lnapectlons), if available: Remarks: Sample plot located on compacted dirt road adjacent lo WeUand B; no evidence of wetland hydroklgy. . US Army Corps of Engineers Wast em Mounralns, Valley, and Coasr-Interim Vemion WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: Applican\/Owner: Quendall Terminals Quendall Ctty/County: Renton/King State: WA Sampling Date: Sampling Point: 04/23/2009 WetC SP#1Wet lnvest!gator(s): A. Gale, J. Pursley Section, Township, Range: 29/24Nl5E Landform (hills.lope, terrace, etc.): Constructed stormwater feature Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slape {°k): None Subregion (LRR): A Lat 47.53N Long: 122.20W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Norma sandy loam NVi/J classificaUon: Are climatic I hydrologic conditions Qn the site typical for this time of year? Yes No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation D. Soil D, Or Hydrology D. significantly disturbed? Are ·Normal Circumstances" present? Are Vegetation D, Soil D. Or Hydrology D. naturally problematic? (If needed, expla!n any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc ' ' ' Hydrophytic Vegetation Presenl? Yes l1'l No D Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes D No D Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes l1'l No D Remarks: Weiland B is a recently constructed slormwater feature that receives stormwater runoff from the property. VEGETATION -Use sclentlflc names of nlants Tree Stratum (Plot Size: 30 fool radius) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size: 15 foot radius) 5. Populus bals,mifera 6. &#Ix laslandra 7. 8. 9. Absolute % Cover 25 25 Dominant Species? ::;: Total Cover lndi~tor filoll!>. Yes FAC Yes FACW 50= Total Cover Dominance Test Worksheet: Number of Dominant Species Thal Are 0BL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Prevalence Index worksheet: Total% Coverqf: None mapped Yes l8J No Yes l1'l 2 2 100 Multiply by: x1 = x2= x3 = x4= x5= No D D (Al (B) (A/8) Herb Stratum (Pio! Size: 3 foot radius) 10. OBLspecies FACW species FAC species FACU specles UPL species Column Totals: (A) (BJ 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. ~ Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size: ) 1. 2. = Totail Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 40 Prevalence Index : BIA ~ Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Yes Dominance Test is >50% ?mvalence Index is ~3.01 Morphological Adaptations 1 {Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non~Vascular Plants1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 {Explain) 1lndlcatora of hydr•c SOil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problemalic. Hydrophytic Vegetatfon Present? Yes No D Remarks: 100% dominant wetland vegetation per the Dominance tesl Young willows and cottonwoods surrounded constructed stormwater feature. US Army Corps of Engin6era Western Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim VeffliOn Project Site: Quendall Terminal SOIL Samollna Point: Wet C SP#1Wet Profile Deseription: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) I Depth Matrix Redox Features [Inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type' Loe~ Texture Remarks ------- 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM::Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2LocaUon: PL=Pore Lining, M=Ma.trix Hydric Soll [ndicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwln noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Solls3: D Histosol (A1) D Sandy Redox (S5) D 2 cm Muck (A10) D HisUc Epipedon (A2) D Slripped Matrix (S6) D Red Parent Material (TF2} D Black Histic (A3) D Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Hydrogen Suffide (M) D Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) D Depleted Below Dark Surlace (A11) D Depleted Matrix (F3) D Thick Dark Surface (A 12) D Redox Dark Surface (F6) D Sandy Mucky Mineral {S1) D Depleted Dark Surfaoe (F7) 3tndicatora of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland D Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) D Reclox Depressions (FS) hydrology musl be present, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Restrlc:tlve Layer {If present): Type: Depth (Inches): Hydric: Soils Present? Yes D No D Rema!'ks: Due lo known contaminants in the study area, soil pits were not excavated in some areas. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary lncSicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) D Surface Water (A 1) D Water-Stained LeaYeS (B9} D Water-Stained Leaves (B9) llll High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) llll Saturation (A3) D Salt Crust (B11) D Oralnage Patterns (B1 O} D Water Marks (81) D Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) D Dry.Season Water Table (C2) D Sediment Deposits (B2} D Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) D Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) D Orifl Deposits (B3) D Oxidil:ed Rhizosph.eres along Living Roots (C3) D Geomorphlc f:Josition (D2} D Alga! Mat or Crust (B4) D Presence or Reduced Iron (C4) D Shallow Aqultard (D3) D Iron Deposits (B5) D Recent Jton Reduction in Ttlled Soirs (C6) D FAC-Neulral Test (05) D Surface Soll Cracks (86) D Stunted or Slrasses Plants (01) (LRR A) D Raised Ant Mounds (D6) {LRR A) D Inundation Visible on Aerial lmagery (87) D Other (Explain In Remarks) D Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) D SpatSely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes llll No llll Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes llll No D Depth Qnches): At surface Saturation Present? Yes llll No D Depth (inches): At surface Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes l!!l No D (lndudes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If available: Remarks: Standing water present in constructed stormwater Cea.ti.ire. US Army Corps of Engineen; Westem Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Jnterim VBt.slon WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: Quendall Terminals Quendall City/County: Renton/King Sampling Date: 04130/2009 WetD SP#1Wet Appficant/Owner: lnvestigator{s): A. Gale, J. Pursley State: WA Sampling Point: Section, Township, Range: 29/24N/5E Landform (hills.lope, terrace, etc.): lakefringe Lat: Local relief (concave, convex, none}: Concave Slope (%); 0 to 2 Subregion (LRR): A 47.53N Long: 122.20W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Bellingham si It loam NWI dassification: Palus1rine scrub-shrub No D (If 110, explain in Remarks.) Are cOmalic I hydrologic conditions on the sile typical fru this time of year? Yes Are Vegetation D, Soil D, Or Hydrology D. significantly disturbed? Are ·Normal Circumstances· present? Yes~NoD Are Vegetation 0, Sail D, Or Hydrology D. naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locaUons transects Important features etc ' ' ' Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 181 No D Hydric Soil Present? Yes 181 No D Js the Sampling Area within a Wetland? Yes 181 No D Welland Hydrology Present? Yes 181 No D Remarks: Wetland D associated with Lake Washingtonj also receives stormwater runoff. VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants Tree Stratum (P1ot Size: 30foot radius) 1. Populus bals-amlfera 2. Salix laslandra 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub §trabJ:m (Plot Size: 15 foot radius) s. Cornus serlcea 6. Lonicera i11volucrate 7. Rubus armenlacus B. 9. Herb Stratum (Plot Size: 3 foot radius) 10. Plantar,o major 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Woody Vine stratum (Plot Size: ) 1. 2. % Bare Grouc\d in Herb Stratum O Absolute ~ 55 35 20 10 10 5 Otlmlnant ~ Yes Yes Indicator S1a1us FAC FACW 90 = Total Cover Yes FACW No No FAC FACU 40 = Total Cover No FACU 5= Total Covet = Total Cover Remarks: 100% dominant wetland vegetation per the Dominance test US Army Corps of Engineers Dominance Test Worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Tolal Number of Oomfnanl Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are 0BL, FACW, or FAC: Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover pf: OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species 3 3 100 Multiply by: xt = x2= x3= x4= x5= (A) (8) (NB) Column To1ars: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = BIA= HydrOphytic Vegetation lndlc,tor.s: Yes Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is ~3.0 1 Morphological Adaptalions1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet} Wet11;md Non-Vascular Ptants1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetationi {l:xplaln) 11ndM:3tors of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless dt:Slurbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Western Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Version D Project Site: Quenda11 Terminal SOIL Sam"Jinn Point Wet D SP#1Wet Prcifile Deseription: (Describe to the depth needed to document lhe indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) I Depth Matrix Redox Fealurcs (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist} % Type 1 Loc2 Texture Remarks ------- Oto6 10YR 3/2 100 None None None None Sandy loam 6 lo 18+ 10 YR 3/1 100 10YR 4/6 ,o D M Silt loam Compacted 1Type: c~ Concentration, D=Depletion, RM-Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PU=Pore Lining. M=Matrix Hydric Soll Indicators: {Applicable to au LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils!: D Hit;losol (A 1) D Sandy Redox (S5) D 2 cm Mud<. (A10) D Histic Eplpedon {A2) D Stripped Matrix (S6) D Red Parent Material (TF2) D Black Histic: {A3) D Loamy Mucky Mineral {F1) (except MLRA. 1) D Other {Explain In Rom arks) D Hydrogen SuW<de (A4) D Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 181 Depleted Below Oark Surface (A 11) D Depleted Matrix (F3) 181 Thick Dark Surface (A12) D Redox Dark Surface {F6) D Sandy Mucl<y Mineral ($1) D Depleted Dark Surface {F7) Jlndlcators of hydrophytic vegelation and ..wtland D Sandy Gloyed Matnx (S4) D Redox Depressions (FS) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or ruoblematlc. Restrictive Layer (If present): Type: Coarse angular rock Depth {Inches): S...Slnches Hydr1e Soils Present? Yes t!!I No D Remarks: 2 chroma, mottles. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: P,imary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Sec.ondary Indicators (2 or more required) D Surface Water (A1) t!!I Water-Stained Leaves (B9) D Water-Stained Leaves (89} D High Water Table (A2) (exeept MLRA 1, 2, 4A. and 4B) (MlRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) D Saluration (A3) D Salt Crust (811) D Drainage Patterns (81 O} D Water Marks (81) D Aquatic Invertebrates {B13} D Dry-Se~on Water Table (C2) D Sediment Deposits (B2) D Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) D Saturation Visible on Aerial lmagety (C9} 181 Drift Deposils (B3) D Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) D Geomorphlc Position (02) D Algal Mat or Crust (84) D Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) D Shallow Aquitard {03) D Iron Deposits (85) D Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) D FAC-Neutral Test (05} D Surface Soil Cracks {66) t!!I Stunted or Stresses Plants (D1) (LRR A) D Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (lRR A) D Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) D Other {Explain in Remarks) D Frost-Heave Hummocks {07) t!!I Sparsely Veg eta led Concave Surface (BB) Ffeld Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes D No t!!I Depth (inches}: Watet Table Present? Yes t!!I No D Depth (inches}: 4 inches Saturation Present? Yes t!!I No D Depth {inches}: Al surface Wedand Hydrology Present? Yes 181 No D (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Primary indicators present. US Army Cor,os al Engineers Western Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: Applicant/Owner: lnvestlgator(s}: Qucndall Terminals Quendall A. Gale, J. Purstey Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc:.): Lakefringe Lat Subregion (LRR): A Soil Map Unit Name: Bellingham silt loam 47.53N City/County: Renton/King Sampling Date: State: WA Sampling Point: Section, Township, Range: 29/24N/5E: Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Long: 122.20W Datum: 04/3012009 WetD SP#2Wet Slope (%): 0 lo 2 NWI classification: Palustrine scrub-shrub Are climatic J hydrologic conditions on lhe site typical for this time of year? Yes Are Vegetation D, Soil D. Or Hydro(ogy D, significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation D, Soil D. Or Hydrotogy D. naturany problemaUc7 l8I No D (If no, explain In Remarks.) Are ~Normal Circumstances~ present? (If needed, exp!ain any answers in Remarks.) Yes 181 No D SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampUng point locations transects Important features etc ' ' ' Hydrophytic Vegetalion Present? Yes 181 No D Hydric Soil Present? Yes 181 No D Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland? Yeo 181 No D Wetland Hydrology Presenl? Yes 181 No D Remarks: Wetland D associated with Lake Washington; also receives stormwater runoff. VEGETATION -Use scientific names of n[ants Tree Skatum (Plot Size: 30 foot radius) 1. Alnus rubra 2. 3. 4. Saplino(Shrub Stratum (Plot Size: 15 foot radius) 5. Comus ser/cea 6. Rubus spec.tabilis 7. Rub us armenlacus 8. 9. Herb Stratum (Plot Size: 3 foot radius) 10. Iris pseudacorus 11. Epilobium c/1/atum 12. Phalaris arundlnacea 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size: ) 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Slralum O Absolute ~ 75 15 10 5 5 5 5 Dominant ~ Yes Indicator ~ FAC 75 = Total Cover Yes Yes No FACW FAC FACU 40 = rotal Cover Yes Yes Yes OBL FACW FACW 15= Total Cover = Total Cover Rema:Jks: 100% dominant weUand vegetation per the Dominance test US Anny Corps of Eng;neers Sample plot located near the lake's edge. Dominance Test Worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number or Dominant Species Across All Strate: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Prevalence Index worksheet: Tota! % Coyer of: 6 6 100 Multiply bY: x1 = x2 = x3= x4 = x5 = (A) (B) (A/B) OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPl species Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index= BIA = (B) Hydrophytlc Vegetation Indicators: Yes Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index Is 9.01 Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Planls1 Problematic HydrophyticVegetation1 (Explain} 1lndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytlc Vegetation Present? Yes No Western Mot1nteins, Valley, and Coast-Interim Ve/Mln D Project Site: Quendall Terminal SOIL Samolioo Point: Wet D SP#2Wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of lndlcatotS.) I Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Cotor (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type 1 Loc 2 Texture Remarks ------- Oto 10 10YR 211 100 None None None None loamy sand 10 to 12 2.5Y YR4/1 75 10YR4/6 25 RM M Loamy sand Oxidized rhizospheres, transition 12 to 18• 2.5Y 411 100 None None None None Sand 1Type: C= Concentration. D=OepleUon, RM=Reduced Matro:, C~overed or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: Pl=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydrle Soll lndrcators: (Appll~ble to aJI LRRs, unless otlterwlse noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc So11$1: D Hlstosol (A 1) li!I Sandy Redox (S5) D 2 an Muck (A10) D Hlstic Epipedon (A2) D $flipped Malm< (S6) D Red Parent Material (TF2) D Black Histic {A3) D Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (e..,.pt MLRA 1) D other (Explain in Remarks) llll Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) D Loamy Gleyed Malrix (F2) D Depl~ed Below Da.-k Surface (A11) D Depleted Mato, (F3) .. D Thick Dark Surface (A 12) llll Redox Dark Surface (F6) D Sandy Mucky Mlneral (S1) D Depleted Darl<. Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland D Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) D Radox Depressions {F8) hydrology must be present. unless disturbed or rvnti1ematiC. Restrictive Layer (If present}: Type: Depth (Inches): Hydric Soll& Pr&sent? Yes Ill! llo D Remarks: 1 chtoma. mottles. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) llll Surlace Water (A1} D Waler-Stained Leaves {89) D Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Ill! High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) Ill! Saturation {A3) D Salt Crust (B11} D Dl'8inage Pattetns (B10) D Waler Marks (81) D Aquatic Invertebrates (813) D Dry-Season Water Table (C2) D Sediment Deposils {B2) D Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) D Saturation Vi$ible on Aerial Imagery (C9) D Drift Deposits (B3} D Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3} D Geomorphic Position (D2) D Algal Mat or Cl\l$t (B4) D Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) D Shallow Aqultard (D3) D Iron Deposits (B5) D Recent Iron Reduction ln Tilled Soils (C6) D FAG-Neutral lest (05} D Surtace Sol Cracks (86) D Stunted or Stresses Plants (D1) (LRR A) D Raised Ant Mounds {06) (LRR A) D Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) D other (Explain in Remarks) D Frost-Heave Hummocks (07) D Sparsely Vegetaled Concave Surfaoe (86) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes llll No D Depth (inches): At surface Water Table Present? Yes llll No D Depth (inclles): At surface Saturation Present? Yes llll No D Depth (inches): At surface Welland Hydrology Present? Yes llll No D (fncludcs capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge. monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remark.a; Primary indicators present. us Army Corps of Engineers Western Moonlains, Va/fey, and Coast-l11terim Vern/on I WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Pwject Site: ApplicanUOwner: lnvestigator(s): Quenda!I Terminals Quendall A. Gale, J. Pun.lay Landform (hiUslope, terrace, etc.): Lakefringe Lat: Subregion (LRR): A Soil Map Unit Name: Bellingham silt loam 47.53N City/County; Renton/King Sampling Date: State: WA Sampling Poinl: Section, Township, Range: 29/24N/5E Local retief(concave, convex, none}: Concave long: 122.20W Datum: 04/30/2009 Wet DSP#1Up Slope(%): 0 to 2 NWI classification: Palustrine scrub-shrub Are climatic/ hydrologic: conditions on the site typical For this time of year? Yes Are Vegetation D. Soil 0. Or Hydrology D, significantly disturbed? 181 No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are MNormal Circumstances" present? Yes 181 No D Ate Vegetation D, Soll 0. Or Hydrology D, naturally problematic? (If needed, explatn any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, Important features, etc. Hydrophytie Vegetation Present? Yes 181 No D Hydric Soil Present? Yes D No 181 Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland? Yes 181 No D Wetlal'Ld Hydrology Present? Yes 181 No D Remarks: Welland D associated with Lake Washington;: also recelves stormwater runoff. VEGETATION -Use scientific names or olants Tree Stratum (Plot Size: 30 foot radius) 1. Populus bsl.samifera 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot $i7,e; 15foot radius) 5. Rubus armeniacus 6. Populus balsamifera 7. 8. 9. Herb Stratum (Pklt Size: 3 foot radius) 10. Eplloblum c/1/atum 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Woody Vine Stralum (Plot Siz:e: ) 1. 2 % Bam Gr'Ound in Herb Stratum 30 Absolute % Cover 100 25 5 5 Dominant Species? Yes Indicator filDl!li FAC 100 = Total Cover Yes FACU No FAC 30 = Total Cover Yes FACW 5= Total Cover = Total Cover Remarks: 66% dominant wetland vegetation per the Dominance test US Army Corps of Ertgineen. Sampte plot located adjacent to WeUand D. Dom(nance Test Worksheet: Number of Dominant Species Thal Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dontinant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: Prevalence Index worksheel: Total% Cover of: 2 3 66 Mutlip[y by x1 = x2= x3= x4= x5= (A) (B) (A/B) OBLspecies FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = BJA :: Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Yes Dominance Test Is >50% Prevalence Index is 9.01 Morphological Adaptations, (Provide supporllng data in Remarks or on a separate sheet} Wetland Non-Vascular Plants 1 Problematic Hydrophyt.ic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 11ndicalors of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Ye& No We.stem Mountains, Valley, and Coast-lntel'im Version D Ptoject Sita: Quendall Terminal SOIL Samnllnn Point: Wat D SP#11Jn Profile Description: (Desctibe lo the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence, of Indicators.) I Depth Malrix Redox Features (;nches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type 1 Loc2 Texture Remarks -------Oto 18+ 2.5Y 5/2 100 None None None None Loamy clay Compacted 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Mamx, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2LocaUon: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydrfc Soll Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc So11s 3: D Hislosol (A 1 ) D Sandy Redox (85) D 2 ,cm Muck (A10) D Histic Epipedon (A2} D Stripped Matrix (S6) D Red Parent Material (TF2) D Bisel< Hislio (A3) D Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) D Other (Explain In Remarks) D Hydrogen Suffide (A4) D Loamy Gleyed Matrbc (F2) D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) D Depleted Matrtx (F3) D Thick Dark Surface (A12) D Redox Dark Surface (F6) D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1 l D Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytlc vegetation and wetland D Sandy Gleyed Matrix ($4) D Redox Depressions (F8) hydrology must be present, unless dtslurbed or nroblematic. Restrictive layer (If present}: Type: Depth ~nches): Hydric Solls Present? Yes D No 181 Remarks: No evidence of hydric soirs. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators; Primary Indicators {minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) D Surface Water (A1) D Water-Stained Leaves (B9) D Water-Stained Leaves (89) D High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A. and 4B) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) 181 Saturation (A3) D SaltCrust{B11) D Drainage Patterns (B1 O) D Water Marks (81) D Aquatic Invertebrates {B13) D Dry-Season Water Table (C2) D Sediment Deposlls {82) D Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) D Saturation Vrsible on Aerial Imagery (C9} D Drift D8JX,lsits {B3} D Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) D Geomorphlc Position (02) D Algal Mal or Crust (84) D Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) D Shallow Aqultard (D3) D Iron Deposits (85) D Recent Iron Reduction in TIOed Soils (C6) D FAC-Neutral Test (D5) D Surface Soil Cracks (86) D Stunted or Stresses Pl'ants (01) (LRR A) D Raised Ant Mounds. (D6) (LRR A) D Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Frost-Heave Hummocks (07) D Sparsely Vege1aled Concave Surface (88) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes D No 181 Depth {inches): Water Table Present? Yes D No 181 Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yos 181 No D Depth (inches): (Includes capillary fringe) At surface Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 181 No D Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspecUons), if available: Remarks: Primary indicators present; saturation at surface. US Army Co,ps of Engineers Western Mountains, Vaf/ey, and Coast-Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: Applicant/Owner: lnvesligator(s): Ouenda!I Terminals Ouenda\l City/County: Renton/King Sami:il!ng Date: State: WA Sampling Point: 04/30/2009 Wet E SP#1Up A. Gale, J. Pursley Section, Township, Range: 29/24N/5E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Constructed slormwater feature Local relief (concave, convex., none): Concave Slope(%): None Subregion (LRR): A Lat 47.53N Long: 122.20W Lmtum: Soil Map Unit Name: Norma sandy loam NW/ ClaSSificaUon: Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical rot this time of yea(} Yes No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation D. SOil D, Or Hydrology D. significantly disturbed? Are ·Normal Circumstances· present? Are Vegetation 0, Soil D, Or Hydrology D. naturally problematic'? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FJNOINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects Important features etc • ' ' Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 181 No 0 Hydric Soil Present? Ye, 0 No D Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes D No 181 Remarks: Sample plot located on compacted dirt road adjacent and upland to Wetland B. VEGETATION-Use scientific names of nlants Tree Stratum (f>lot Size: 30 foot radius) 1. Populus balsamifera 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size: 15 foot radius) 5. Lonicera involucrats 6. Rubus armenl9eus 7. Cornus sericea B. 9. Herb Stratum (Plot Size: 3 foot radius) Absolute % Cover 75 15 10 5 Dominant ~ Yos Indicator Status FAC 75 = Total Cover Yos No No FAC FACU FACW 30 = Total Cover Dominance Test Worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Domin:ant Species Acrtiss All Strala: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL. FACW, or FAC: Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: None mapped Yes 18:1 No Yes D 3 3 100% Multiply by: x.1 = x2= x3;: x4= x5= No 0 181 (A) (B) (NB) 10. Epilobium cm a tum 15 5 5 Yes No No FACW UPL NL OBL species FAC:W species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column lotals: (A) (B) 11. Hedera helix 12. Geranium robertlanum 13. 14. 1S. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size: ) 1. 2. 25 = Total Cover = Total Cover Prevalence Index = SIA = Hydrophytlc Vegetation Indicators: Yes Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is ~3.01 Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheel) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants 1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetalioo 1 (Explain) 11ndicatora of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or probtematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground In Herb Stratum 25 Present? Yes 181 No D Remarks: 100% Percent of Dominant Species that are FAC, FACW, orOBl. Large cottonwood extending from we11and to test plot. US Army Corps of Engineers We.stem Mounlalns. Valley, and Coast-Interim Version Project Site: Quendali Terminal SOIL Samolina Point: Wet E SP#1 Uo Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) I Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type 1 l.oc2 Texture Remarks ------- 1Type: C= Concentration, D=DepleUon, RM=Reduced MBlrix, CS=Covered 01 Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix HydrJc Soll Indicators! (Applleable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) lndlcatol'$ for Problematic Hydric Soi1s 3 : D Hlstosol (A1) D Sandy Redox (S5) D 2cmMuck(A10) D Hlstic Eplpedon (A2) D Stripped Matrix (SB) D Red Parent Material (TF2) D Black Hlstlc (A3) D Laa my Mucky t.1fnaral (F1) {except MLRA 1) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Hi,lrogen Sulfide (M) D Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) D Depleted Matrix {F3) D Thiel< Dark Surface (A12) D Redox Dark Surface (F6} D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) D Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland D Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) D Redox DepreSSlOns (Fa} hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or nroblematic. Restrictive Layer (If present): Type: Depth (Inches): Hydrlc Salls Present? Yes 181 No D Remarks: Due to known contaminanls in the study area, SOil pits were not excavated in some areas. Test plot located on bermed area acf'.jacent to Wetland E and has developed into dirt road. Soils appear very compact. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary lndk:ators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary lndicatol'& (2 or mom required) D Surface Water (A1) D Water-Staine<! Leaves (89) D Water-Stained Leaves {B9} D High Water Table (A.2) (except MLRA 11 2, 4A, and 4B} {MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) D Saturation (A3) D Salt Cru5t (B11) D Drainage Patterns (810) D Waler Marks (81) D Aquatic Invertebrates (813) D Dry-Season Water Table (C2) D Sediment Deposits (82) D Hydrogen Sulficle Odor (C1) D Saturation Visible on Aerial lme.gery (C9) D Drift Deposits (B3) D Oxidized Rhizospheres along living Roots (C3) D Geomorphic Position (D2) D Algal Mal or Crust (B4) D Presence of Reduced Iron (C4} D Shallow Aquitard (D3) D Iron Deposits (B5) D Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sorls (C6) D FAG-Neutral Test (05} D Surface Soil Cracks (B6) D Stunled or Stresses Plants (01) (LRR A} D Raised Ant Mounds {06) (LRR A) D Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7} D Other {t)q)lain in Remarks) D Frost-Heave Hummoeks (D7) D Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observatfons: Surface Water Present? YO$ D No 181 Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes D No 181 Depth (incttes): 4 inches Saturation Present? Yes D No 181 Deplh {inches): Af. surface WeUand Hydrology Present? Yes D No 181 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos. previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Sample ptol located on compacted dirt road adjacent to Wetland B; no evidence of wetland hydrology. US Atmy Corps of Engineers Westem Mounlalns. Valley, and Coast-lnlerlm Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: Quendall Terminals Quendall City/County: Renton/King Sampling Date: 04/30/2009 Wet E SP#1Wet Applicant/Owner: State: WA Sampling Point: I n"8stigator{s): A. Galo, J. Pursley Section, Township, Range: 29/24N/5E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Constructed stormwater feature Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope(%): o -2 % Sub<eg<>n (LRR): A Lat: 47.53N Long: 122.20W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Norma sandy loam NWJ classification: None mapped Are climalie I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for lhis time of~r? Yes No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation D, Soil D. Or Hydrology D. significantly disturbed? Are ·Normal Circumstances~ present? Yes~NoD Are Vegetation D, Soil 0, Or Hydrology D. naturally problematic? (If needed. explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects Important features etc ' ' ' Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 181 No D Hydric Soil Present? Yes D No D Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland? Wetland HydroSogy Present? Yes 181 No D Remarks: Wetland E is a constructed stormwater feature that receives stormwater runoff from the property. VEGETATION -Use scientific names of Plants Tree Stratum (Pl)!: Size: 30 foot radius) 1. Salix laslandra 2. Populus bals,mifera 3. 4. Sap[ing§hrub Stratum (Piel Size: 15 foot radius) 5. Rut,us ffrmen/acus 8. 7. 8. 9. Absolute ~ 90 10 5 Dominant Species? Yes No Indicator ~ FACW FAC 100 = Total Cover Yes FACU 5= Total Cover Domrnance Te&t Worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Slrata: P0fC8nt of Dominant Species That Arc OBL, FACW, or FAC: Prevalet1ce Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: OBL species FADN species FAC species FACU species UPL species Yes 181 1 2 50 Muttlpjy by; x1 = x2= x3= x4;; x5= No D (A) (B) (NB) Herb Stratum (Plot Size: 3 foot .-a.dius) 10. Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index= BIA= (B) 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Siz-a: ) 1. 2. = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 20% Remarks: SO% dominant wetland vegetation per the Dominance test. US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrophytic Vegetation lndfcators: Yes Dominance Test Is >50% Prevalence Index is 53.0 1 Morphological Adaptations~ (Provide supporting data in Remerks or on a separat& sheet} Wetland Non-Vascular Pfants 1 Problematic HydrophytK. VegelaClon 1 (Explain) 1 lndlcalors of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytle Vegetation Present? Yes No Western Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Version D Project Site: Qoondalt Terminal SOIL Sarmilinn Pojnt: Wet E SP#1Wet Profile Description: (Describe ta the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) I Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Cotor (moist) % Color (Moist) % Ty~1 Loc2 Texture Remarks ------- ~Type: C= ConcenlraUon, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soll lndrcators: (Applicable to ell lRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils": D Histosol (A1} D Sandy Redox {S5) D 2 cm Muck (A10) D Kistle Epipedon (A2) D Stripped Matrix (S6) D Red Parent Material (TF2) D Black Hlstic (A3} D Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) D Other (Explain in Remark:s) D Hydrogen Sulfide (M) D Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) D Depleted Below Dark Surface {A11) D Depleted Metruc (F3) D Thick Dark Surface (A12) D Rectox Dark StJrface (F6) D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1) D Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3[ndica!Ol"S of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or D Sandy Gleyed Mauix (S4) D Redox Depressions (F8) .. :-lematic. Restrictive Layer (If present): Type: Depth (Inches): Hydrlc Soils Present? Yes D No D Remarks: Due to known conlaminanls in lhe study area, soil pits were not excavated in some areas. ttYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary lndicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) D Surface Waler (A 1) D Water-Stained Leaves (B9) D Water-Stained Leaves (B9) 181 High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 181 Saturation (A3) D 5811 Crust {B11) D Drainage Patterns (B10) D Water Marks (81) D Aquatic Invertebrates (813) D Dry-Season Water Table (C2) D Sediment Deposits (92) D Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) D Saturation VJslble ot1 Aerial Imagery (C9) D Drtlt Deposits (83) D Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roets (C3) D Geomorphic Position (02) D Algal Mat or Crust (84) D Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) D Shallow Aquitard (DJ) D Iron Deposits (B5) D Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) D FAG-Neutral Test (05) D Surtace Soil Cracks (86) D Stunted or Stresses Plants (01) (LRR A) D Ra;sed Ant Mounds (00) (LRR A) D Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) D Other (Explaln in Remarks) D Frost-Heave H ummacks (07) D Sparsely Vegetated Concave Sulface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Presenl? Yes 181 No 181 Depth (inches): Water Tabla Present? Yes 181 No D Depth (inches): At surface Saturation Present? Yes 181 No D Depth {inches): At surface Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 181 No D (includes capiHary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (sh'8am gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos., previous Inspections), if available: Ttde gauge installed in coostructed stormwater feature. At time of stJrvay water was et height O'. Evidence that water at one time reached 4 feel No indication if the tide gauge was Installed correctly. Remarks: Standing water present In cons\ructed stormwater feature. US Army Co,ps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valley, and Coast-lntcmm Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: Applicant/Owner: lnvestigator(s): Quendall Temiinals QuendaU City/County: Renton/King State: WA Sampling Date: Sampting Point: 05106/2009 Wet~ SP#1Up A. Gale, J. Pursley Landfonn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Subregion (LRR): A Lakefringe Lat: Soil Map Unit Name: Norma sandy loam 47.53N Section, Township, Range: 29/24N/5E Local relief (concave, convex, none): Long: 122.20W None Datum; NWI classification: 181 No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Slope(%): Oto 2 None mapped Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Are Vegetation 0, Soil 0, Or Hydrology D, significanUydisturbed? Are Vegetation D, Soil D, Or Hydrology D, naturally problematic? Are ·Normal Circumstances~ present? Yes Ill No D (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locatlons1 transects, Important features, etc. Hydr'Ophytic Vegetation Present? Yes D No ml Hyclric Soil Present? Yes D No D Is the Sampling Area withln a Wetl.imd? Yes D No Ill Wetfand Hydrology P,esent? Yes D No Ill Remarks: Data plot location on upland berm between WeUand F and WeUand C. VEGETATION-Use sclenU!ic names of nlanls Tree Stratum (Plot Size: 30 foot radius) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size: 15 foot radius) 5. Rubus armeniacus 6. 7. 8. 9. Herb Stratum (Pfot Size: 3 foot r,eidlus.) 10. Polygonum cusp/datum 11. Eplloblum c/1/atum 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Woody VlnA Stratum (Plot Size: ) 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 0 Absolute %Cover 30 60 5 Dominant ~ :;;; Total Cover Yes Indicator Status FACU 30 = Total Cover Yes No ' FACU FACW 65 = Total Cover = Total Cover Dominance Test Worksheet; Number of Dominant Species That Are 0 (A) OBL, FACW, orFAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across 2 (B) All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are 0% (A/B) OBL, FACW, or FAG: Prevatence Index worksheet Tolal % Cover of; MulliBl:t b~ Oe:Lspecles x1 = FACW species x2= FAC species x3= FACU species x4 = UPL species x5= Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index ::: BIA= (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: No No Domina.nee Test is >50% Prevalence Index is ~.01 Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Reman<S or on a separale sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants 1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 11ndicators of hydrlc soil and wetland hydrok)gy must be PJesent, unless disturbed or problematic. HydrophyUe Vegetation Present? Yes D No Remarks: Oo/o dominant weUand vegetation per the Dominance last and Prevalence index < 3. Hydrophytic vegetaUon not presenl US Anny Corps of l=ngfneers Weslem Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Version Project Site: Quendall Terminal SOIL Samolina Point; Wet f SP#1 U" Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document Hle indicator or confirm th@ ~bsence of Indicators.) I Deplh Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type' Lee' Texture Remarks --------- 1Type: C= Concentration, D=DepSetion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS;::;Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 1Location: PL;::;Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3: D Histosol (A 1) D Sandy Redox (S5) D 2 cm Muck (A10) D Histic l:;:pipedon {A2) D Stripped Matrix {S6) D Red Parent Material (TF2) D Black Histic (A3) D Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) 0 Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 0 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) D Thick Dark Surface (A 12) D Redox Dark Surface (F6) D Sandy Mucky Mineial (S1} 0 Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 11ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland D Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) D Redox Depressions {FS) hydrclogy must be present, unless disturbed or nrobtematic. Restrlctlve Layer (If present}: Type, Depth (Inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes 181 No D Remarks: Due to known contaminants in the study area, soil pits were not excavated in some areas. HYDROLOGY Weiland Hydrology Indicators: Prima,y lndica.tOl'S (minimum of one required; check all that apply} Seconda,y Indicators (2 ex more required) D Surface Water (A 1) 0 Water-Stained Leaves (89) D Water-Stained Leaves (B9} D High Wator Table (A2J (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) 0 Saturation (A3) D SaltCrust{B11) D Drainage Patt.er'O$ (B10) D Watet Marks (B1) D Aquatic Invertebrates (613) D Dry-Season Water Table (C2) D Sediment Deposits (B2) D Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1} D Saturation Vlsible on Aerial Imagery (CS) D Drift Depesits (63) D Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) D Geomorphic Position (D2) D Algal Mat 0< Crust (64) D P1esenca or Reduced Iron (C4) D Shallow Aquitatd (D3} D Iron Deposits (B5} 0 Recent lion Reduction in Tilled Soils {C6) D FAC-NeutraI Test (05) D Surface Soll Cracks (86) D Stunted or Stresses Plants (01} (LRR A) 0 Raised Ant Mounds {06) {LRR A) D Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) D 0th.er (Explain in Remarks) D Frost-Heave Hummocks (07} D Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88} Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes D No 181 Depth (inches}: Water Table Present? Yes D No 181 Depth (Inches): 15 inches Saturation Present? y .. D No 181 Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) At. surface Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes D No 181 Oesalbe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If avaUable: Remarks: No evidence of we'liand hydrology. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains. Valley, and Coast-Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: Applicant/Owner. lnvestigator(s): Ouenda!I Terminals Quendall A. Gale, J. Pursley Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Lakefringe Subregion (LRR): A Lat Soil Map Unit Name: Nonna sandy loam 47.53N City/County: Renton/King Sampling Date: State: WA Sampling Point: Section, Township, Range: 29/24N/51;; Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Long: 122.20W Datum: 05/()6/2009 W91 F SP#1Wet Slope(%): o lo 2 NWI classification: None mapped Are cllmatlc I hydrologic condltions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes AreVegetation D, son D. OrHydrology D, slgnlficantlydlstt1rbed? Are Vegetation D, Soi1 O. Or Hydrology D, naturally prob1ematlc1 No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances· pre$8nt? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Yes 181 No D SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locatlons transects Important features etc . . • Hydrophyti'c Vegetation Presenl? Yes 181 No D Hydric Soil Present? Yes 181 No D Is the SampUng Area within a Wetland? Yes 181 No D Watland Hydrology Present? Yes 181 No D Remarks: WeUand F associated. with Lake Washington; al&o receives stormwaler runoff and overflow from WeOand C constructed stonnwater structure. VEGETATION -Use scientific names of nlants Tree Stratum (Plot Size: 30 foot radius) 1. 2. 3. 4. §apJinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot Si2:e: 15 foot radius) 5. Alnus rubra 6. Salix lasiandra 7. Rubus armeniacus 8. Populus balsamifera 9. Herb Stratum (Plot Size: 3 foot radius) 10. Juncus effusus 11. Phalarls arundinacea 12. Iris pscudacorus 13. Gal/um aparlno 14. Plantago major 15. Rumex crlspus 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size: ) 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum5 Absolute ~ so 1S 15 10 JS 25 10 10 s 5 9G Dominant Species? lndicator ~ 100 = Total Cover Yes FAC No FACW No FACU No FAC 90 = Total Cover Yes FACW Yeo FACW No OBL No FACU No FACU No FAC 10 = Total Cover = Total Cover Remat'ks: 100% dominant wetland vegetation per the Dominance test US Army Corps of Engineers Dominanca Te,t Work5heet: Number of Dominant Species That Ive DBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across AH Strata: Percent or Domlnant Species Yhat Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Prevalence Index worksheet: Total% Cpyft( of: 3 3 100 Multiply by: x1 = x2= x:l= x4= x5= (A) (B) (NB) OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = BIA :;: Hydrophytfc Vegetation Indicators: Yes Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is ~.01 Morphological Ade.ptations·· [Provide supporting data in Remar1c;s or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vasoolar Plants 1 Probfematic Hydrophytlc Vegetation1 (Explain) 1\ndlcators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed 01 problematic. HydrophyUc Vegetation Present? Yes 181 No We~em MaunJains, Valley, and Coast-lnlerim Vernion D Project Site: Quendall Terminal SOIL Sampling Point Wet F SP#1Wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document tho Indicator or confinn the absence of indicators.) I Depth Matrix Redox features (inches) Colof (moist) % Color (Moist) % Typo' Loe' Texture Remarks ---------Oto6 2.SY 4/2 80 10YR 5/6 20 RM PL Sand 6 to 18+ 2..5Y4f1 60 10YR 4/6 40 RM PL Sand 1Type: C= Concentration, [);:Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Coverod ot Coat8d Sand Grains. ilocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soll Indicators: (AppHcable to all LRRs, unless otherwiH noted.} Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3 : D Histosol (A1) D Sandy Redox (S5) D 2 cm Muck (A10) D Histic Epipedon (A2) 181 Stripped Matrix (SB) D Red Parent Material (TF2) D Black Histic (A3) D Loamy Mucky Mineral (f1) {except MLRA 1] D Other(Explain in Remarks) D Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) D Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Ill! Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) D Oepleled Matrix (F3) Ill! Thick Dark Surface {A 12) D Redox Dark Surface (F6) D Sandy Mucky Miner al (St) D Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Jndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland D Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) D Redox Depressions (F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Restrictive Layer (if present}: Type: Depth (Inches): Hydrfe Soils Ptesent? Yes Ill! No D Remarks: 2 chroma mth mottles. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 ar more required) D Surface Water (A1) D Water-Stained Leaves (89) D Water-Stained Leaves (89) Ill! High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A,. and 4B) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) Ill! Saturation (A3) D SaltCrust(B11) D Drainage Patterns {810) D Water Marks (81) D Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) D Dry-Season W,;1terTable (C2) D Sedlmen! Deposits (B2) D Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) D Saturation Visible on Aerial lmagety {C9) Ill! Drift Depooils (B3) D Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) D Geomorphic Position (02) D Algal Mat or Crust (84) D Presenco of Reduced Iron (C4) D Shallow Aquitard (DJ) D Iron Deposils (85) D Recent Iron Reduction in Trlled Soils (C6) D FAC-Neutral Test (D5} D Surface Soil Crad:.s (B6} D Stunted of Stresses Plants (D1) (LRRA) D Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) D lnundetion Visible on Aerial Imagery (87} D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Frost-Heave Hummocks (07) D Sparsely Vegetaled Concave Surface (BB) Field Observations: Surface Water Presenl? Ye, D No 181 Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes Ill! No D Depth (inches): 11 inches Saturation Present? Yes Ill! No D Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) 11 inches Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Ill! No D Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if avallabfe: Remarks: Saturation and standing water obsetved in sample plot US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains. Valley, and Coast-fntsn·m Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: Qucndall Terminals City/County: Applicant/Ovmer: Ouendall Renton/King Stale: WA Sampling Date: Sampling Point 05106/2009 WetGSP#1Up lnvestigator(s): A. Gale, J. Pursley SecJion, Township, Range: 29/24N/5E Landform (hlllslope, terrace, elc.): Constructed storrnwater feature Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Sklpe (%): None Subregion (LRR): A lat: 47.53N 122.20W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Norma sandy loam NWI classification: None mapped l8J No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are climatic/ hydrologic conclitioos on tha 5lte typical for this time of year? Yes A,e Vegetation D, So~ D, Or Hydrology O. significantly disturbed? Are ·Nonna! Circumstances~ present? Yes l8I No D Are Vegetation D. Soil D, Or Hydrology D, naturally problematic:? (If needed, explain any answsrs In Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling polnl locations transects Important features etc ' ' ' Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes D No 181 Hydric Soil Present? Yes D No D Is the Sempllng Area within a Wetland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes D No 181 Remarks: Sample plot located on compacted berm adjacent and upland to Wetland G. VEGETATION -Use sc entlflc names of Dlants iroe Stratum {Plot Size: 30 foot radius) 1. 2. 3. 4. SaplinqlShrub Stratum (Plot Size: 15 foot radius) 5. Rubus armeniacus 6. 7. 6. 9. Absolute %Cover 25 Dominant Species? Indicator fil;!M 75 = Total Cover Yes FACU 30 = Total Cover Dominance Test Worksheet: Number or Dominant Species That Are 0BL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FArNo/, or FAC: Prevalence Index worksheet: To1al % Coyer of: Yes D 0 2 100% Multiply by· x1 = x2 = x3= x4= x5= No 181 (A) (B) (NB) Herb Stratum (Plot Size: 3 foot radius) 10. Polygonum cuspidatum 60 Yes FACU OBL species FACW species FAC speciea fACU specie& UPl species Column To1ats: (A) Prevalence Index= BIA = (B) 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 25 = Total Cover Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot Size: } 1. 2. = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Slratum 25 Hydrophyt1c Vegetation Indicators: Yes Dominance Test ls :>50% Prevalence Index is $).01 Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants 1 ProbCematic Hydrophylic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 11ndicators of hydrlc soil and welfand hydrology must be present. unless dishJrbed or problematic.. Hydrophytlc Vegetation Present? Yes D No Remarks: No Dominant Species that are fAC, FACW, or OBL. No wetland vegetation observed in sample plot US Anny Corps of Engineer.. West.em Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Ve~on Project Site: Quendal! Temiinal SOIL Samolina Point: Wet G SF'#1Uo Profile Descript!on: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.} I Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type 1 Loe' Texture Remarks --------- 1rype: C= Concentratloo, D=DepJetion, RM:.Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. •tocation: PL=F'ore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soll Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.} Indicators for Problematic Hydric So11s 1: D Histosol (A 1) D Sandy Redox (S5) D 2 cm Muck (A10) D Hlslic Epipedon (A2) D Stripped Matrix (S6) D Red Parent Material (TF2) D Black Histic (A3) D Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) D Olher (Exprain in Remarks) D Hydrogen Sum.de (A4} D Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) D Depleted Bek>w Dark Surface (A11) D Depleted Matrix (F3) D Thick Dark Surface {A 12) D Redox Dark Surface (F6) D Sandy Mucky Miner.al (S1) D Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndic::ators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland D Sandy Gleyed Mattix (S4) D Redox Depressions (FB) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or nroblematlc. Restrictive layer (If present}: Type: Depth (Inches); Hydric Soils Present? Yes 181 No D Remarks: Due to knoWJ1 contaminants in the sludy area, soil pits were not excavated in some areas. HYDROLOGY WeUand Hydrology lndlcators: Primary Indicators (mlnlmum of one required; check all thet epply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more requir'8d) D Surface Water(A1) D Water.Stained Leaves (89) D Waler·Stained Leaves (89) D High Water Table (A2} (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) D Saturation (A3) D Salt Crust(B t 1) D Drainage Pattems (810) D Water Marks (B 1) D Aquatic Invertebrates (813) D Dry.season Water Table (C2) D Sediment Deposits (82) D Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) D Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) D Drift Deposits (83) D Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) D Geomorphic Position (D2) D Algal Mat or Crust (B4) D Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) D Shallow llquttard (03) D [ron Deposits (BS) D Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) D FAC·Neutral Test (D5) D Surface Soil Cracks {B6) D Stunted or Slresses F'lan1S (D1) {LRR A) D Raised Anl Mounds (D6) (LRR A) D Inundation Visible on Aeria! Imagery (87) D other (Explain In Remarks) D Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) D Sparsely Vegelated Concave Surface (98) Field Ob$erv•tlons: Surface Water Present? Yes D No 181 Depth (inches): Water Ta.ble Present? Yes D No 181 Depth (inches): 4 Inches Saturation Present? Yes D No 181 Depth (inches): At surface Wetland Hydrotogy Present? Yes D No 181 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring wen, aerial photos, previous inspections), if availabSe: ' Remarks: Sample plot located on compacted upland area adjacent to Wetland G; no evidence of wetland hydrology. US Anny Gorps of Engineera Weslem Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: Applicant/Owner: Quendall Termina1s Ouendall lnvestigalar(s): A. Gale, J. Pursley City/County: Rentorv'King Sampling Date: State: WA Sampling Point: Section, Township, Range: 29/24N/5E: 05/6/2009 WetG SP#1Wat Landform {hillslope, terrace, etc.): Constructed stormwater feature Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope{%): None Subregion (LRR): A Lat 47.53N Long: 122.20W Datum: Soll Map Unit Name: Norma sandy loam NWI dassification: None mapped Are dlmatic / hydrologic conditions on lhe site typlcal for this time of year? Yes No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation 0, Soil D, Or Hydrology D, significantly disturbed? Are MNormal Circumstances· present? Yes ~ No D Are Vegetation D. Soil 0, Or Hydrology D. naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampUng point locations, transects1 Important features, etc. Hydrophytlc Vegetation Present? Yes 181 No D Hydric Soll ?resent? Yes D No D Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland? . ·. Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 181 No D . Remarks: Wetland G Is a constructed stormwatar feature that receives stormwater runoff from the property, VEGETATION-Use scientific names ofolants Tree Stratum (Plot Size: 30 foot radius) 1. Sall,c laslandra 2. Alnus rubra 3. 4. Saplinp/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size: 15 foot radius) 5. Comus sericea 6. Rubus armenJacus 7. B. 9. Absolule %Cover 60 20 20 10 Dominant Species? Yes Yes Indicator ~ FACW FAC 60 = Total Cover Yes FACW No FACU 30 =Total Cover Dominance Test Worksheet; Number of Dominant Species That Arc OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number Of Dominant Speaes Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL,FACVV,orFAC: Prevalence Index worksheet: Tota[ % Cover of: OBLspecies FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species Yes 181 3 4 75% Ml@P!Y by: x1 = x2 = x3= x4= x5= No D (A) (B) (NB) Herb Stratum (Plot Size: 3 foot radius) 10. Polygonum cusp/datum 5 Yes FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 5 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size: ) 1. 2. = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 25 Remarks: 75% Percent of Dominant Species that al'8 FAG, FACW, or DBL. US Army Cotps of Engineers Prevalence Index = BIA = Hydrophytic Vegetation lndleators: Vas Domlnance Test is :,.50% Prevalence Index is ~3.01 Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet} Wetland Non·Vascular PJants, Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain} 11ndieators of hydric SOil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed Of problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Westem Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Version D Project Site: Quendall Terminal L SamplinQ Point Wet s \Up Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox i:eatures (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Typa 1 Loc1 Texture Remarks --------- 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Deplet'ion, RM=Redw::ed Ma1rix, CSs::Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 1Location: PL=Pora Lining, M=Matfbc Hydric Soll Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: D Histcsol (A1 I D Sandy Redox (SS) D 2 cm Muck (A10) D Histic Epipedon (A2) D Stripped Matrix (SS) D Red Parent Malarial (TF2) D Black Hislic (A3) D Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) {except MLRA 1) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Hydrogen·Sulfide (A4) D Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2} D Depleted Below Dark Surface {A11} D Depteted Matrix (F3) D Thlck Dark Surface (A 12) D Redox Dark Surface (F6) D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) D Depteted Dark Surface {F7) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland D Sanely Gleyed Matrix (S4) D Redox Depressions (FS} hydrology mu$t be present, unless disturbed or orobfematlc. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (Inches): Hydric Soils Present? v •• 181 No D Remarks: Due to known contaminants in the study area, soil pits were not excavated in some areas. HYDROLOGY WeUand Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; cheek all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) D Surface Water (A1) D Water-Stained Leaves (B9) D Water-Stained Leaves (B9) D High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) D Saturation (A3} D Salt Crust (811) D Drainage Patterns (B10} D Water Marks (B 1) D Aquatic Invertebrates (813) D Dry-Season Water fable (C2) D Sediment Deposits (B2) D Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) D Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) D Drift Deposits (B3) D Oxidized Rhizosph.eres along Living Roots (C3) D Geornorphic Position (D2) D Algal Mat or Crust (84) D Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) D Shallow Aquitard (D3) D Iron Deposits (B5) D Recent Iron Reduction in TIiied Soils (C6} D FAG-Neutral Test (05) D Surface Soil Cracks (B6) D Stunted or Stresses Plants (D1) (LRR A) D Raised Ant Mounds (D6) {LRR A) D Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) D Sparsely Vegetated Concave Su.rface (BB) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes 181 No D Depth (inches): At surface Water Table Present? Yes 181 No D Depth (inches): At surface Saturation Present? Yes 181 No D Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) At surface Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 181 No D Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring weU, aerial photos, previous inspections), ir available: Remarks: Standing water present. US Army Corps of Engineen, Western Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project st,e: City/Gou nty: Renton/King Sampling Date: 05/06/2009 Applicant/Owner: Quendall Tenninals Quendall State: WA Sampling PQ'nt: Wet H SP#1 Up lnvestigator(s): A. Gale, J. Pure;ley Section, Township, Range: 29/24N/5E Landform (hiHslope, terrace, etc.): Oitch Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slc,pe (%): 0 to 2 Subregion (LRR): A lat: 47.53N Long: 122.20W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Norma sandy loam NWI dassificatlon: None mapped 1:8:1 No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are climatic I hydroJogic conditions on lhe site typical forthfs time of year? Yes Are Vegetation D. Soll D. Or Hydrology D. significantly disturbed? Ate Vegetation 0. Soil D, Or Hydrology O. naturally problematic? Are ·Notmal Circumstances~ present? Yes 1111 No D (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showrng sampling point locatlons transects Important features etc • . . Hydrophyllc Vegetation Present? Yes 11!1 No D Hyclric Soil P(8Sent? Yes D No D Js the Sampling Area within a Wetland? Yes 11!1 No D Wetland Hydrology ?resent? Yes D No 11!1 Remarks: Wetland H was hlstorlcally a ,constructed stormwater feature that conveys water to Lake Washtngton. During the survey stormwater flowed direcdy Into the wetland as well as to an adjacent ditch that conveyed water to Wetland H via a culvert. Upland plot located on berm north of wetland. VEGETATION -Use scientific names of nlants Tree Stratum (Plot Size: 30 foot radius) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum {Plot Size: 15 foot radius) 5. Rubus armenlacus 6. 7. B. 9. Herb Stratum (Plot Size: 3 foot radius) 10. Phalarls arundlnac;ea 11. Equlsetum a,vense 12. Polygonum cuspldatum 13. Tanacefum vulga,e 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Woody Vine Stratum {Plot Size: ) 1. 2. % Bare Ground in He.-b Stratum 20 Absolute % Cover 25 40 10 10 10 Dominant ~ = lotal Cover Yes Indicator ~ FACU 25 = Total Cover Yes No No No FACW FAC FACU NL 70= Total Cover = Total Cover Dominance Test Worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are 1 (A) OBL, FAON, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across 2 (B) All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species Thal Are 50 (NB) OBL, FACW, or FAC: Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Coyer of: Munil2!~~ OBL species x1 !:! FACW species 40 x2= 80 FACspacles 10 x3= 30 FACU species :15 x4= 140 UPL species x5= Column Tolals: B5 (A) 250 (B) Prevalence Index = BIA = 2.94 Hydrophytlc Vegetation Indicators: Yes Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is ~3.01 MOl'ph.Ological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet} Wetland Non-Vascular Plants 1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1lndicators of hydric $Oil and wetlancl hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. HydrophyUc Vegetation Present? Yes No D Remarks: 100% dominant wetland vegetation per the Dominance test Prevalence index < 3.0. Hydrophytic vegetation present. US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mounrains, Vall$y, and Coast-Interim Version Project Site: Quendall Terminal SOIL Samclina Point: Wet H SP#1Wet Proflle Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) I 0.plh Matrix Redox Feature$ (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type 1 Loc.2 Texture Remarks --------- 1Typc: C= Concentration, D•Oepletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grakls. 2Location: Pl=Pore lining, M~Matrix Hydrtc Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless olherwise noted.) Indicators for Probtematlc Hydric Solls3 : D Histosol (A 1) D Sandy Redox (S5} D 2 cm Muck (A10) D Histic Eplpedon (A2) D Stripped Matrix (S6) D Red Parent Material (TF2) D Black HisUc {A3) D Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) D Loamy Gleyed Motrix (F2) D Depleted Below Dark Surface {A 11) D Dep1eted Matrix (F3} D Thick Dark Surface (A 12) D Redox Dark Surface (F6) D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) D Oepleled Dark Surface {F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic Yegetation and wetland D Sandy Gleyed Mobix (S4) D Redox Dflpressions (F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or nmhtemat1C. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth {Inches): Hydrlc Solis Pre$ent? Yes 1111 No D Remarks: Due to known contaminants in the study area, soil pits were not exca ... ated in some areas. HYDROLOGY We1tand Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) D Surface Water (A1) D wa,er-Stainecl Leaves (89) D Water-Stained Leaves (89) D High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A. and 4B) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4S) D Saturalion (A3) D SallCrust(B11) D Drainage Patterns (B1 O} D WaterMarl<s(B1) D Aquatic Invertebrates (813} D Dry-5eason Water Table {C2) D Sedimcnl Deposits (62) D Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) D saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) D Dritt Deposits {B3) D Oxidized Rt.izospheres along Living Roots (C3) D GeorT'IOfJ)hic Position (02) D l'Jgal Mot o, Crust (B4) D Presence or Reduced Iron (C4) D Shallow Aquitard (03) D lmn Deposits (BS) D Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6) D FAG-Neutral Test (05) D Surface Soll Cracks (BG) D Stunted or Stresses Plants (D1) (LRR A) D Raised Ant Mounds {D6) (LRR A) D Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D ~tost•Heave Hummocks {07) D Sparsely Veg&1ated Concave Surface (B8) field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes D No 1111 Depth (inches}: Water Table Present? Yes D No 1111 Depth (inches}: 4 inches Saturation Present? Yes D No 1111 Depth (inches): (ineludes capillary fringe) At surface Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes D No 1111 Describe Recorded Oala (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). if available: Remafks: No wetland h)'drology present. us Anny Corps of Engineers We.stem Mountains, Valley, and coast-Interim Vera/an WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: ApplicanVOwner. Quendall Terminals Quendrul City/County: Renton/King State: WA Sampling Dale: Sampling POlnt: 05106/2009 WotH SP#1Wet fnwtsligator(s): A.. Gale, J. Pursrey Section, l"ownship. Range: 29/24N/5E Landform (hilrslope, terrace, etc.): Ditch Local l'elief (concave, convex, none): None Slope(%): o to 2 Subregion (LRR): A Lat: 47.53N Soil Map Unit Name: Norma sandy loam Are dlmaUc / hydrologic conditions on the sile typical for this time of year? Yes Are Vegetation D, Soil D, Or Hydrology D, slgnlficanlly disturbed? Are Vegetation D, Soll D, Or Hydrology D, naturally problematic? Long: 122.20W Datum: NWl classification: 181 No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances· present? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects Important features, etc • . Hydrophytic Vegetallon Present? Yes 181 No D Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes D No D Is the SampUng Area within a Wetland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 181 No D None mapped Yes C!!3 No Yes 181 No Remarks: Wetland H was histotlcally a constructed stormwater feature that conveys water to Lake Washington. During the survey stormwater flowed dlrecuy Into the wetland as well as to an adjacent dJtch that conveyed water to Wet1and H via a culvert. VEGETATION -Use scientific names of c lants Tree Stratum (Plot Size: 30 foot radius) 1. Populus balsamlfera 2. 3. 4. Sap1ingl§hn.Jb Stratum (Plot Size: 15 fool radius) 5. Alnus rubra 6. Salix laslandra 7. Lonicera lnvotucrate a. Spitaea douglasll 9. Rubus af'lfleniacus Herb Stratum (Plot Size: 3 foot radius} Absolute ~ 40 20 20 15 15 10 Dominant ~ Yes lr'ldieator Status FAC 40 = Total Cover Yes FAC Yes FACW No FAC No FACW No FACU 80 = Total Cover Dominance Test Worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: TCIU:11 Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FAOO, ot FAC: Prevalence Index worklhoet. Total % Cover of; DBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species 5 5 100 Multiply by· x1 .. x2= x3 = x4= .x5= D D (A) (B) (NB) 10. Juncus etfusus 10 Yes FACW Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = BJA = (BJ 11. Phalaris arundinacea 12. Equlsetum arvense 13. Rumex crispus 14. Ranunculus repens 15. Convolvulus arvensis 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Wopdy Vine Stratum (Plot Size: ) 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Strat\lm 40 10 5 5 5 5 Yes FACW No FAC No FAC No FACW No NL 40= Total Cover = Tota! Cover Rema.rks: 100% dominant wetla.nd vegetation per the Oomlnanoo test . US Almy Corps of Engineer., Hydrophydc Vegetation Indicators: Yes Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is 9.01 Mocphotogica1Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular PJants 1 Problematic Hydrophytlc Vegetation 1 (Expfain} 11ndicators of hydric soll and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Westem Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Version D Project Site: Quendall Terminal SOIL Samnlina Point; Wet H SP#1Wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document lhe indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) I Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color {Moist) % Type 1 loc2 Tex1ure Remarks --------- 1Type: C= ConcenttaUon, D=DepJetion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered 01 Coated Sand Grains. 2Localion: PL=Pore lining, M=Matrix Hydrlc Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': D Histosol (A 1} D Sandy Redox (S5) D 2 cm Muck (A10) D Histic Epipedon {A2) D St,;pped Matrix (SE) D Red Parent Material (TF2} D Black H;strc (A3) D Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Hydrogen Suffide (A4) D Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) D Depleted Betow Dark Surface (A11) D Depleted Matrix (F3} D Thick Dark S1Jrface (A12) D Redox Dark Surface (FS) D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) D Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 1N8Uand D Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) D Redox Depressions (F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or "roblematic. Restrictive lay1!r (if present): Type: Depth (Inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes 181 No D Remarks: Due to known contaminants in the study area, soil pits were not excavated in some areas. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: F'rimary Indicators {minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) 181 Surtace Water {A 1} D Water·Stained Leaves (69) D Water.stained leaves (89) 181 High Water Table (A2) (exeept MLRA 1, 2, 4A, a11d 4B) (MLRA 1, 2,4A, and 4B) 181 Saturation (A3) D Salt Crust (811 I D Drainage Patterns (B10) lill Water Marks (81) D Aquatic Invertebrates (813) D Ory.season Water Table (C2) 181 Sediment Deposits (B2) D Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) D Saturation Visible on Aerial lmsgecy (C9} 181 Drift Deposits (83) D Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) D Gcomorphic Position (D2) D Algal Mat or Crust (B4) D Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) D Shallow Aqultard (03) D Iron Deposits (B5) D Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) D FAC·Neutral Test (D5) D Surface Soil Craeks (BB) D Stunted or Stresses Plants (D1) (LRR A) D Raised Ant Mounds (D6) {LRR A) D Jnundat\on Visible on Aerial lmagery (87) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Frost·Heave Hummocks (D7) D Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) Fleld ObservaUons: Surface Watet Present? Yes 181 No D Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes 181 No D Depth (inches): 4 inches Saturation Present? Yes 181 No D Depth (Inches): (includes capilfary lringe) At surface Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 181 No D Describe Recorded Data (str&am gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), ff available: Remarks: Saturation and standing water observed in sample plot US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: ApplicanVOwnar: lnvestiga1or(s): Quendall Te1minals Quenda.11 A. Gate, J, Pursley Landform {hlllslope, terrac&, etc.): Ditch Subregion (LRR}: A Lat Soil Map Unit Name: Bellingham Slit Loam 47.31N City/County: Renton/King sampling Date: State: WA Sampling Point: Section, Township, Range: 29/24N/5E Local relief {concave, convex, none}: Concave Long: 122.11w Datum; 06/19/2009 Up I SP#2UP Slope (%Jc O to 2 NWI classification: None mapped Are climallc / h)'drologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Are Vegetation D, Soil D, Or Hydrology D, significantly disturbed? Ive Vegelation D. Soil D, Or Hydrology 0, naturally problematic? 181 No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Ate "Nonnal Circumstances" present? Yes 181 No D (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.} SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytlc Vegetation P~ent? Yes D No ll1l Hydric Soil P1esent? Yes D No ll1l Is th& Sampling Area within a WeUand? Yes D No ll1l Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes D No ll1l Remarks: Wetland I ls located between a elty road and a State/ federal lnte111tate. The area Is a depression and ditch which appeal'S to have standing water or saturated soils for several months a year. VEGETATION Use scientific names of olants Tree Stratum (Plat Size: 30 foot radius) 1. Salix ltiSiandra 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size: 15 foot radius) 5. Polygonum cuspidatum 6. Rubus armenlacus 7. a. 9. Herb Stratum (Plot Size: 3 foot radius) 10. Epiloblum clllatum 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 16. 19. 20. Woody Vine Stratum {Plot Size: ) 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 95 Absolute % Cover 15 90 10 5 Dominant ~ Yes Indicator ~ FACW 15 = Total Cover Yes No FACU FAC 100 = Total Cover No FACW 5 = Total Cover = Total Cover Dominance Test Worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are 1 (A) OBL, FACW, or FAC: lotal Number of Dominant Species Across 2 (B) All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Ate 50 (A/B) OBL, FACW, or FAC: Prevalence Index worksheet: Total% Coverot MultiQl:i~~ OSL species 0 x1 = f/W('/ species 20 ,2 a 40 FAC species 10 x3a 30 FACU species: 90 x4= 360 UPL species x5= Column Totals: 120 (A) 430 (8) Prevalence Index = Bf A= 3.58 Hydroph)ltlc Vegetation lndlcators: No Dominance Test is >50% No Prevalence Index is 53'.01 Morpholog!cal Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks OI' on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants 1 ProbSematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 11ndicators of hydric soil a.nd wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytlc Vegetation Pf'eSent? Yes D No Remarks: The area is dominated by Japanese knotweed which is choking out the entire herb and shrub stratum. US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains, Valley, and Coast-J11terlm Version Project Site: Quendall Terminal SOIL Samoii"""' Point U ... I SP#2UP Profile Description: (Deaeribe to the depth needed to document the !ndicator or confirm the ab$ence of Indicators.) I Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type1 Lac 2 Texture Remarks -------0-8 10y,-313 100 None Silt loam 8-18 10y,-313 95 7.5yr 518 5 RM M Slit loam 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Locarion: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydrlc Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematlc Hydric Soils~: D Histosol (A 1) D Sandy Redox (S5) D 2cm Muek (A10) D Histic Ep[pedon (A2) D Stripped Matrix (S6) D Red Patent Material (TF2) D Black Histic {A3) D Loamy Mueky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) D Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) D Depleted Below Dar1o. Surface (A11) D Depleted Matrix (F3) D Thick Dark Surface (A 12} D Redox Dwk Surface (F6) D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1} D Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weUand D Saady Gleyed Matrix (S4) D Redox Depressions (F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or oroblematic. Restrictive Layer {If present): Type: Depth (Inches); Hydric. Soils Present? Yes D No 181 Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland liydrology lndleatol'$: Primaty Indicators (minimum Of ona required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) D Surface Water (A 1) D Water-Stained Leaves (89) D Watcr•Stained Leaves (89) D High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, end 48) D Saturation (A3) D Salt Crust (811) D Drainage Patterns (810) D Water Marks (81) D Aquatic Invertebrates (813) D Dry-Season Water Table (C2) D Sediment Deposits (82) D Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) D Saturalion Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9} D D!lft Deposits (B3) D Oxidized Rhi.wspheres along Living Roots (C3) D Geomarphic Position (D2) D Algal Mat or Crust (B4) D Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) D Shallow Aquilard (D3) D Iron Deposits (B5) D Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) D FAG-Neutral Test (D5} D Surface Soil Creeks (86) D Stunted or Stresses Plants (D1) (LRR A} D Raised Ant Mounds (06) (LRR A) D lnundatioo Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) D Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (Ba) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes D No 181 Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes D No 181 Depth (inches): Saturation F'reset1t? Yes D No 181 (includes capillary fringe) Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes D No 181 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial pholos, previous Inspections), if available: Remarks: No evidence of hydrology was found at lhis soil plot. US Army Corps of Englneera Wastem Mountains, Valley, and Coast-lnten"m Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site; Applicant/Owner. lnvestigator'{s}: Quendall Terminals Quendalt City/County, Renton/King State: WA Sampling Date: Sampling Point: 06/19/2009 Wei I SP#1Wet A. Gale, J. Pursley SecUon, Township, Range: 29/24NJ5E Landform (hiltslope, terrace, etc.): Ditch Local relief (concave. convex, none}: None Slope ('M O to 2 Subregion (LRR): A lat: 47.31N Long: 122.11W Datum; Soil Map Unit Name: Bellingham SIii loam NWI classification; None mapped 181 No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are climatic I hydro logic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Are Vegetation 0. Soil 0, Or Hydrology D. significanlly disturbed? Are Vegelation D. Soil 0, Or Hydrology D. naturally problematic? Are "Normal Circumstances .. present? Yes 181 No D (It needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, lmportant featurest etc.. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 181 No D Hydric Soil Present? Yes 181 No D ls the Sampling Area within a Watland? y .. 181 No D WeUand Hydrology Present? Yes 181 No D Remarks: Wetland I ls located between a city road and a State/ federal Interstate. The area Is a depression and ditch which appurs to have standing water or saturated soil& for several months a year. VEGETATION -Use sclentlflc names or Dlants Tree Slrab.Jm (Plot Size: 30 foot radius) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size: 15 foot radius} 5. Sanx laslam;tra 6. Poly{Jo11um cusprdatum 7. Com us sericea 6. 9. Herb Stratum (Plot Size: 3 foot radius) 10. Eplloblum cl/Jarom 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 16. 19. 20. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size: ) 1. 2. '% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 95 Absolute %Cover 15 25 60 5 Dominant ~ [ndicator - 0 = Total Cover No No Yes FACW FACU FACW 100 = Total Cover Yes FACW 5= Total Covet = Total Cover Remarks: 100% dominant wetland vegetation per the Dominance test US Anny Corps of Engineers Dominance Test Worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are 2 (A) OBL, FACW, or FAG: Total Number of Dominant Species Across 2 (BJ All Strata: Pen::ent of Dominant Species That Are 100 (A/B) OBL, F ACW, or FAC: Prevalence Index worksheet: Total% Cover of: Mulli&1l!i m:;; OBL species 0 x1 = FACW species BO x2= 160 FAC species 0 x3= FACU specie& 25 x4= 100 UPL species x5= Column Totals: 105 (A) 260 (B) Prevalence lndax = BIA = 2.47 Kydrophytlc Vegetation Indicators: Yes Yes Dominance Test is ;:;,.50% Prevalence Index is ~3.01 Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data. in Remarks or on a separate sheet) WeUand Non.Vascular Plants 1 Problematic Hydrophytlc Vegetation 1 (~in) 11ndicatas of hydric soil and weUand hydrology must be present, un[ess disturbed or problemaOc. HydrophyUc Vegetation Present? Yes No Westem Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Vero/on D Project Site: Quendall Terminal SOIL Sal"P"WS# mo mo Qjnt: et I P IWet Proflle Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the lndleato .. or confinn the absence of lndtcators.) I Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color {moist) % Color (Moisl) % Type 1 Loe~ Texture Remarks ---------0-6 10:,,r 3/1 100 Loam 6-12 10yr3/2 85 2.5yr4/6 15 0 M Loam 12-18 5y 412 50 10yr6/8 50 0 M Loam 2.5Y 412 25 D PL 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils~: D Hislosol {A1) D Sandy Redox (S5) D 2 cm Muck (A10) D Histic Eplpedon {A2) D Stripped Matrix (S6) D Red Parent Material (TF2) D Black Hlsli<: (A3) D Loamy Mucky Mineral {F1) (except MLRA 1) D other (Explain in Remarks) D Hydrogen Sulfide (Ml D Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) 181 Depleted Matrix {F3) D Thick Dark Surface {A 12) D Redox Dark Surface (F6) D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1} D Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators ot hydrophytic vegetation and wetland D Sandy Gleyed Matri:11: (S4) D Redox Depressions (FB) hydrology mtJSt be present, unless disturbed or nroblema.tic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Dep'lh (Inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes 181 No D Remarks: Depleted matrix HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) 181 Surface Water (A 1) D Water-Stained Leaves (B9) D Water-Stained leaves (89) 181 High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) 181 Saturation (A3) D SaltCrust(B11) D Drainage Patterns (810) 181 Water Marks (81) D Aquatic Invertebrates (813) D Dry-Season Water Table (C2) D Sediment Deposits (B2) D Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) D Sa'luration Visible on Aerial Imagery (CS) D Drift Oepos;ls (B3) D Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) D Geomorphic Posilion (D2) D Algal Mat or Crust (84) D Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) D Shallow Aqu;Jard (D3) D Iron Deposils (BS} D Recent Iron Re<:luction in Tilled Soils (CS) D FAC-Neuttal Test (05) D Surface Sail Cracks (B6} D Stunled 01 Stresses Plants (D1) (LRRA) D Raised Ant Mounds (06) (LRR A) D Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery {87) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Frost-Heave Hummocks (07} D Sparsely Vegetaled Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Presenl? Yes 181 Na D Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes 181 No D Depth (inches): 11 inches Saturation Present? Yes 181 No D Depth (inches): (lndudes capillary fringe) At surface Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 181 No D Describe Recorded Data (sh'eam gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Saturation and standing water observed in sample plot US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim V~ion WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: ApplicantJOwner: ln't'estigetor(s): Quandall Terminals Quendall City/County: Renton/King Sampling Dale: State: WA Sampling Point: 06/19/2009 UpJSP#2UP A Gale, J. Pursley Section, Township, Range: 29'24N/5E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.}: Ditch local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope(%): 0 to 2 Subregion (LRR): A Lat: 47.31N Long: 122.11W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Bellingham sm Loam NWI clssslficatlon: None mapped Are climatic/ hydrotogic conditions on the site typical ror this time of year? Yes t81 No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation D, Soil D, Or Hydrology D, significantly disturbed? Ate "Norma.I Circumstances· present? Yes J:81 No D Are Vegetation D, Soil D, Or Hydrology D, naturally pr<>blemetic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc. Hydrophytlc Vegetation Present? Yes D No J:81 Hydr)C Soll Present? Yes D No J:81 Is the Sampling Area within a WeUand? Yes D No Wetland Hydro1ogy Present? Yes D No J:81 Remarks: Wetland J Is located between a city road and a State/ federal Interstate. The area Is a depression and ditch which appears to have standing water or saturated solls for several months a year. VE GET AT JON -Use scientific names of olanls Tree Stratum (Plot Size: 30 foot radius} 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Slratum (Plot Size; 15 foot radius) Absolute % Cover 5. Rubus armenlacus 80 6. Phal,rls ,rundinacea 15 7. 8. 9. Dominant Indicator ~ ~ 15 = Total Cover Yes FACU No FACW 100 = Total Cover Dominance Test Worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are 1 OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across 2 All Slrata; Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover gf: Mul1iEi!~by::; OBL species 0 x1 -= 0 FACW species 15 x2= 30 FAC species x3= FACU species 80 x4 = 320 UPL species x5= J:81 (A) (B) (A/8) Herb Stratum (Plot Size: 3 foot radius) 10. C!llumt1 Totals: 95 (A) 350 (B) 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 5 • Total Cover wopgy Vine S1ratum (Plot Size: ) 1. 2. = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 95 Prevalence Index= BIA= 3.7 Hydrophyllc Vegetation Indicators: No No Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is ~3.0 1 Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland NonNa&cular Planls 1 Problematic Hydrophytlc Vegetation 1 {Explain) 1 lndlcatora of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be presen~ unless disturbed or problematlc. Hydrophytlc Vegetation Present? Yes D No Remarks: The area is dominated by Himalayan blackberry and choking out the majority of the herb stratum. US Anny Corpt; of Engineers Westem Moun!Sins, Valley, and Coast-lntenm Version Project Site: Quendall Terminal SOIL Samalino Paint Un J SP#2UP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or conHrm the absence of Indicators.) I Dsptti Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type' Loc2 Tex1.ure Remarks ---------0-18 10yr 4/2 100 None Sitt loam 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematlc Hydrlc Solls3: D Histosol (A 1) D Sandy Red'ox (S5) D 2 cm Muck (A10) D Hlstic Epipedon (A2) D Stripped Matrix (S6) D Red Parent Material (TF2) D Black Histic (A3) D Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) D Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) D Depleted Below Dark Surface {A11) D Depleted Matrix (F3} D Thick Dark Surface (A12) D Redox Dark Surface (F6} D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) D Depleted Dark Surfac.e (F'7) 3Jndicators of hydroph)'tic vegetation and wetland D Sand~ Gleyed Matrix (S4} D Redox Depressions (F8) hydrology must be present. unless disturbed or oroblematic. Restrictive Layer (If present): Type, Depth (Inches.): Hydrtc Soils Prest:1nt? Yes D No C!ll Rernarb; HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology lndfcators: Primary Indicators (minimu m of one required; check all thal apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more l'tlquired) D Surface Waler (A 1) D Water-Stained Leaves (B9) D Water-Stained Leaves (B9) D High Water labla (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4S) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) D Saturation (A3) D Salt Crust (811) D Drainage Patterns (810) D Water Marks (B1) D Aquatic Invertebrates (813) D Dry-Season Water Table (C2) D Sediment Deposits (B2) D Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) D Saturation Vrsible on Aerial Imagery (C9) D Drift Deposits (83) D Oxidized Rhizospheres along living Roots (C3} D Geomoi:phlc Position (D2) D Algal Mat or Crust (B4) D Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) D Shallow Aquitard (D3) D Jron Deposits (BS) D Recent Iron Reduction in TiDed Soils (C6) D FAC-Neutral Test (05) D Surface Sojl Cracks (86) D Stunted or Sttesses P1anls (01) (LRR A) D Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) D Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (97) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) D Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Waler P1esent? Yes D No C!ll Depth (inches~ Water Table Present? Yes D No Eill Depth (inches~ Saturation Present? Yes D No Eill {includes capillary fringe) Depth (inches}: Wetland Hydrnlogy Present? Yes D No C!ll Describe Record8d Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspecllons), If availablo: ~emarks: No evidence of hydrology was fot.lnd at this soil plot. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains. Vafloy, arid Coast-Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: Quendall Terminals Quendall City/County; Renton/King Sampling Date: 06/19/2009 Applicant/Owner: State: WA Sampflng Point: Wet J #1Wet lnvestigator{s}: A. Gale, J. Pursley Section, Township, Range: 29/24N/5E Landform (hillslope, lerraoo, etc.): Ditch Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope(%}: 0 to 2 Subregion (LRR): A Lat 47.31N Long: 122.11W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Bellingham Silt loam NWI classification: None mapped Ar8 climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical foI this time of year? Yes 181 No D (If no, exptain In Remarks.) Are Vegetation D, Soil D, o, Hydrology D, significan11y disturbed? Are ·Normal Clrcumstances· present? Yes 181 No D Are Vegetation D, Soil D, Or Hydrology D, naturally prob1emallc? (If needed, explaln any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects, Important features etc . ' Hydrophytlc Vegetation Present? Yes !ill No D Hydric Seit Present? Yes !ill No D ls the Sampling Area within a Watland? Yes llll No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes !ill No D Remarks: Wetland J Is located between a city road and a State/ federal Interstate. The area Is a depression and dHch which appears to have standing water or saturated soils for several mon1hs a year. VlaGETATION -Use sclentffic names of nlants Tree Stralum (Plol Size: 30 foot radius) 1. Alnus rubra 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub stratum (Plot Size: 15 foot radius) 5. Phalarhi atundlmu;ea 6. Rubus armeniacus 7. 8. 9. Absolute %Cover 10 100 15 Dominant ~ Yes lndLCatot Status FAC 0 = Total Cover Yes FACW No FACU 100 = Total Cover Dominance Test Worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Perc.enl of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Prevalence Index worksheet Tolal % Cover ot OBLspecies FACW species FAC sp8(';ies FACU species UPL species 2 2 100 Multiply by; x1 ::. x2; x3= x4= D (A) (B) (A/8) Herb Stratum (Plot Size: 3 foct radius) 10. Column Totals: (A) (B) 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 5= Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Siztt: } 1. 2. = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 95 Remarks: 1000/t., dominant wetland vegetation per the Dominance test US Almy Corps of Engineers Prevalence Index= BIA= Hydrophytlc Vegetation Indicators: Yes Yes Dominance Test Is >50% Prevalence Index is ,!:3.0 1 Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) WeUand Non-Vascular Planta 1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation, (Explain) 11ndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrulogy must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydl'Ophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Westem Mountains, Valley, and Coast -Interim Veroion D Project Site: Quendall Terminal SOIL Sam~ling Poin.t: Wet I SP#lWct P1ofile Description: (Describe to the depth noodod to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) I Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type' Loc 2 Texture Remarks ---------0-, Dense root mal, organic :l-18 10YR 3/1 100 Silty loam 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletlon, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soll Indicators: (Appllcable to all l.RRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc So11s 3: D Histosol {A1) D Sandy Redox (SS) D 2 cm Muck (A10) D Hist<: Eplpedon (A2) D Stripped Matrix (S6) D Red Parent Material (TF2) D Black Histic (A3) D Loamy Mucl<y Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Hydrogen Sulf<te (A4) D Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) D Depleted Below Dark StJrface (A11) 181 Depleted Matrix (F3) 181 Thick Dark Surface (A12) D Redox Dark Surface (F6) D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) D Depleted Dark Surface (F7) :,lnclicators of hydrophylic vegetation and wetland D Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) D Redox Depressione (FS) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or ..._J..lematic. Restrictive Layer (if pr&senf): Type: Depth (Inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes 181 No D Remarks: Thick dark surface with matrix chroma of -.1. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum af one required; check all that apply} Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) 181 Surface Water (A1) D Waror-Stained Leaves (89} D Water-Slained Leaves (B9) 181 High Waler Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 181 Saturation (A3) D Salt Crust (B11) D Drainage Patterns (B10} lil Water Marks (B1} D Aquatic Invertebrates (B13} D Dry-Season Water Table (C2) 181 Sediment Deposits (B2) D Hy<l,ogan Sulfide Odor (C 1) D Saturation Vlslble on Aerial Imagery (C9) 181 Drift. Deposits (83) D Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) D Geomorphic Position (D2) D Algal Mat or Crust (84) D Presence of Reduced Iron (C4} D Shallow Aquitard (03) D Iron Deposits (B5) D Recent I ran Reduction In TIiied Soils (CB) D FAC-Neutral Test (05) D Surface Soil C1c1cks (66) D Stunted or Stresses Plants (D1) (LRR A) D Raised Ant Mounds (06) (LRR A) D Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7} D Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Fleld Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes 181 No D Depth (Inches): Water Table Pmsent? Yes 181 No D Depth (inches): 4inches Saturation Present? Yes 181 No D Depth (inches): (includes capillmy fringe) At surface Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 181 No D Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), lf available: Remarks: Saturation and standing water observed in sample plot US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Version APPENDIX E ECOLOGY WETLAND RATING FORMS A Wetland name or number __ WETLAND RATING FORM-WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2 -Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users Updated Oct 2008 with the new WDFW definitions for priority habitats Name of wetland (if known): _w_e_t_la_nd_A ___________ Date of site visit: 0412312009 Rated by Adam Gale and Joe Pursley Trained by Ecology? YesXNo_ Date of training May 2007 SEC: 29 TWNSHP: 24 N RNGE:..::__ IsS/T/RinAppendixD? Yes_ NoX Map of wetland unit: Figure__ Estimated size 0· 1 Acre SUMMARY OF RATING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland I_ II IIIX IV Category I = Score >=70 Category II = Score 51-69 Category III= Score 30-50 Category IV= Score< 30 Score for Water Quality Functions 12 Score for Hydrologic Functions s t-----1 Score for Habitat Functions 20 r---""11 TOTAL score for Functions 40 Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland I_ II_ Does not Apply X Final Category (do_, th,··;-"""'" from•••~) D s ummarvo f b . . t, as1c m ormation a b th out I d "t ewet an um WetlaiJ.d Unit has Special Wetland HGM Class CharacterlsticS used for Ratin2 Estuarine Depressional Natural Herita11e Wetland Riverine Bog Lake-frinee X Mature Forest Slope Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal La1mon Freshwater Tidal Interdunal None of the above X Check if unit has multiple X HGM classes present Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 To be used with Ecology Publication 04-06-025 August2004 A Wetland name or number Does the wetland unit being rated meet any of the criteria below? If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland. · .. ' ' ' ', _.·' Check List for Wetlands That May Need Additional Protection YES (in addition to the vrotection recommended for its cate2:orv) SPl. Has the wetland unit been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered animal or plant species (TIE species)? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the aooropriate state or federal database. SP2. Has the wetland unit been documented as habitat/or any State listed Threatened or Endangered animal species? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are categorized as Categorv I Natural Heritage Wetlands (seep. 19 of data form). SP3. Does the wetland unit contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WDFW for the state? SP4. Does the wetland unit have a local significance in addition to its functions? For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having special significance. . To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the Hydrogeomorphic Class of the wetland being rated. NO . . X X X X The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. Seep. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 2 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August2004 A Wetland name or number~~ Classification of Wetland Units in Western Washington If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. ln this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7apply, and go to Question 8. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during floods)? NO -go to 2 YES -the wetland class is Tidal Fringe If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? YES -Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO -Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wetland. Wetlands that were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the term "Estuarine" wetland is kept. Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Category land II estuarine wetlands have changed (sec p. ). 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. NO -go to 3 YES -The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a "Flats" wetland, use the form for Deprcssional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet both of the following criteria? X The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any vegetation on the surface) at least 20 acres (8 ha) in size; X At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m)? NO -go to 4 YES -The wetland class is Lake-fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _X_ The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), X The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks. ~The water leaves the wetland without being impounded? NOTE: Swface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3ji diameter and less than 1 foot deep). NO -go to 5 YES-The wetland class is Slope Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 3 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August2004 A Wetland name or number __ 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river __ The overbank flooding occurs at least once every two years. NOTE: The riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding. NO -go to 6 YES -The wetland class is Riverine 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at some time during the year. This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO -go to 7 YES -The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding. The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO -go to 8 YES -The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM clases. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM Classes within the wetland unit being rated f:IGM Class ta Use in Ratinll Slone + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Slope + Lake-fringe Lake-fring:e Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional Depressional + Lake-fringe Denressional Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under wetland wetlands with special characteristics If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or if you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 4 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August2004 A Wetland name or number __ . L Lake-fringe Wetlands . WATER QUALI1Y FUNCTIONS -Indicators that the wetland unit functions to improye water auality . L L 1. Does the wetland unit have the l!Otential to improve water quality? L L 1.1 Average width of vegetation along the lakeshore (use polygons of Cowardin classes): Vegetation is more than 33ft (!Om) wide points= 6 Vegetation is more than 16 (5m) wide and <33ft points= 3 Vegetation is more than 6ft (2m) wide and <16 ft points= 1 Vegetation is less than 6 ft wide points= 0 Mao of Cowardin classes with widths marked L L 1.2 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland: choose the appropriate description that results in the highest points, and do not include any open water in your estimate of coverage. The herbaceous plants can be either the dominant form or as an understory in a shrub or forest community. These are not Cowardin classes. Area of Cover is total cover in the unit, but it can be in patches. NOTE: Herbaceous does not include aquatic bed. Cover of herbaceous plants is >90% of the vegetated area points= 6 Cover of herbaceous plants is >2/3 of the vegetated area points =4 Cover of herbaceous plants is >1/3 of the vegetated area points= 3 Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed or herbaceous covers > 2/3 unit points= 3 Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed in> 1/3 vegetated area points= 1 Aquatic bed vegetation and open water cover> 2/3 of the unit points= 0 Man with noi""Ons of different veoetation tvnes L Add the points in the boxes above L L 2. Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in the lake water, or polluted surface water flowing through the unit to the lake. Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants coming from several sou~es, but any single source would qualify as opportunity. -Wetland is along the shores of a lake or reservoir that does not meet water quality standards -Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft -Polluted water discharges to wetland along upland edge -Tilled fields or orchards within 150 feet of wetland -Residential or urban areas are within 150 ft of wetland -Parks with grassy areas that are maintained, ballfields, golf courses (all within 150 ft. of lake shore) X Power boats with gasoline or diesel engines use the lake -Other YES multiplier is 2 NO multiolier is I L TOTAL -Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from LI by L2 Add score to table on o. 1 Comments Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 9 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August2004 Points ( only 1 score per box) (seep.59) Figure_ 3 Figure_ 3 ----- I 6 I -----(seep.61) multiplier 2 -- 12 A Wetland name or nnmber __ .. Lake-fringe Wetlands L HYDROLOGICFUNCTIONS -Indicators that the wetland Urtitfull.ctions to .· reduce shoreline erosion ... ·•·· . · . . L L 3. Does the wetland unit have the potential to reduce shoreline erosion? L L 3 Distance along shore and average width of Cowardin classes along the lakeshore ( do not include aquatic bed): (choose the highest scoring description that matches conditions in the wetland) > % of distance is shrubs or forest at least 33 ft (10m) wide points= 6 > Y. of distance is shrubs or forest at least 6 ft. (2 m) wide points= 4 > V. distance is shrubs or forest at least 33 ft (!Om) wide points= 4 Vegetation is at least 6 ft (2m) wide (any type except aquatic bed) points= 2 Vegetation is less than 6 ft (2m) wide (any type except aquatic bed) points= 0 Aerial ohoto or mao with Cowardin veaetation classes L Record the points from the box above L L 4. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to reduce erosion? Are there features along the shore that will be impacted if the shoreline erodes? Note which of the following conditions apply. X There are human structures and activities along the upland edge of the wetland (buildings, fields) that can be damaged by erosion. -There are undisturbed natural resources along the upland edge of the wetland (e.g. mature forests other wetlands) than can be damaged by shoreline erosion -Other YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 L TOTAL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from L 3 by L 4 Add score to table on p. 1 Comments Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 10 August2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 :Points (only! score p~box) • ... . .· .. -·"··· (seep.62) Figure_ 4 -----I 4 I -----(seep.63) multiplier 2 8 1 A Wetland name or number __ These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITATFUNCTIONS -Indicators that unit functions to provide important habitat H 1. Does the wetland unit have the potential to provide habitat for many species? H 1.1 Vegetation structure (seep. 72) Check the types of vegetation classes present (as defined by Cowardin)-Size threshold for each class is~ acre or more than 10% of the area if unit is smaller than 2.5 acres. __ Aquatic bed __ Emergent plants L Scrub/shrub (areas where shrubs have >30% cover) LForcsted (areas where trees have >30% cover) If the unit has a forested class check if: __ The forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 200/n within the forested polygon Add the number of vegetation structures that qualify. If you have: Map of Cowardin vegetation classes H 1.2. Hydroperiods (seep. 73) 4 structures or more 3 structures 2 structures I structure points= 4 points= 2 points= l points= 0 Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or l4 acre to count. (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods) __ Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present __ Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present __ Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present __ Saturated only I type present __ Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland __ Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland points= 3 points= 2 point= 1 points= 0 L Lake-fringe wetland = 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland = 2 points Map of hydroperiods H 1.3. Richness of Plant Species (seep. 75) Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ff. (different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold) You do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Mi/foil, reed canarygrass, purple looses/rife, Canadian Thistle If you counted: > 19 species List species below if you want to: 5 -19 species < 5 species points= 2 points= 1 points= 0 Points (only l score porbox) Figure_ 1 Figure_ 2 1 4 Total for page __ _ Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 13 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 A Wetland name or number __ H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats (seep. 76) igure _ Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation classes ( described in H 1.1 ), or the classes and unvegetated areas ( can include open water or mudflats) is high, medium, low, or none. C) 0 0 None= 0 points Low= I point Moderate = 2 points ..._~ ~ High = 3 points [riparian braided channels] NOTE: If you have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water the ratin is alwa s "bi h". Use ma of Cowardin vegetation classes H 1.5. Special Habitat Features: (seep. 77) Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points you put into the next column. LLarge, downed, woody debris within the wetland (>4in. diameter and 6 ft long). LStanding snags (diameter at the bottom> 4 inches) in the wetland X Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at --least 3.3 ft (lm) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the unit, for at least 33 ft (10m) __ Stable steep banks of fine material that might be nsed by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30degree slope) OR signs ofrecent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet turned grey/brown) __ At least Y. acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated. (structures for egg-laying by amphibians) __ Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in each stratum of plants 2 3 NOTE: The 20%stated in early printings of the manual on page 78 is an error. ~------------_;_..:_ _ _::._: _____ .,;;_-=----------~---- H 1. TOTAL Score -potential for providing habitat I 9 I L-------------'A~d.~d~t~he~s~c~o~~~s~fr~o~m~H~l~.~l,~H~l~.2~,~H=l~.3~,~H~l~.4~,=H~l~.5--I ____ J Comments Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 14 August2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 A Wetland name or number __ H 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species? H 2.1 Buffers (seep. 80) Figure_ Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland unit. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See text for definition of "undisturbed. 11 -100 m (330ft) ofrelatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no-grazing, no landscaping, no daily human use) Points = 5 -100 m (330 ft) ofrelatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 50% circumference. Points = 4 -50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% circumference. Points = 4 -100 m (330ft) ofrelatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water> 25% circumference, . Points = 3 X 50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for> 50% circumference. Points = 3 If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above -No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft) of wetland> 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 -No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >50% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points= 2 -Heavy grazing in buffer. Points = 1 -Vegetated buffers are <2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference (e.g. tilled fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points = 0. -Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points= 1 3 Aerial ohoto showina buffers H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (seep. 81) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor ( either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that conoects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads, paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor). YES= 4 points (go to H 2.3) NO= go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 ls the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor ( either riparian or upland) that is at least 50ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake-fringe wetland, if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? YES = 2 points (go to H 2.3) NO= H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 Is the wetland: within 5 mi (8km) of a brackish or salt water estuary OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasture (>40 acres) OR within I mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? YES = 1 point NO = 0 points 2 5 Total for page. __ _ Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 15 August2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 A Wetland name or number __ H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW (see new and complete .. descriptions of WD FW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in the PHS report http://wd(ir. wa.govlhablphslislhtm) Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft (100m) of the wetland unit? NOTE: the connections do not have to be relatively undisturbed. __ Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.4 ha (I acre). _2S._Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (Juli descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 152). __ Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. _Old-growth/Mature forests: (Old-growth west of Cascade crest) Stands ofat least 2 tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 20 trees/ha (8 trees/acre)> 81 cm (32 in) dbh or> 200 years of age. (Mature forests) Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm (21 in) dbh; crown cover may be less that I 00%; crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth; 80 -200 years old west of the Cascade crest. __ Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158). __ Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. __ Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non-forested plant communities that can either take the form ofa dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161). __ Jnstream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. __ Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (fall descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report: pp. 167-169 and glossary in Appendix A). __ Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. __ Cliffs: Greater than 7 .6 m (25 ft) high and occurring below 5000 ft. __ Talus: Homogenous areas ofrock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 -2.0 m (0.5 -6.5 ft), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. __ Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of> 51 cm (20 in) in western Washington and are> 2 m (6.5 ft) in height. Priority logs are> 30 cm (12 in) in diameter at the largest end, and> 6 m (20 ft) long. If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats = 4 points If wetland has 2 priority habitats = 3 points If wetland has 1 priority habitat= 1 point No habitats= 0 points Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list. Nearby wetlands are addressed in ouestion H 2.4) · Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 16 August2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 1 A Wetland name or number __ _ H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland that best fits) (seep. 84) There are at least 3 other wetlands within Y, mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields, or other development. points= 5 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within Y, mile points= 5 There are at least 3 other wetlands within Y, mile, BUT the connections between them are disturbed points= 3 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetland within Y, mile points= 3 There is at least 1 wetland within Y, mile. points= 2 There are no wetlands within Y, mile. points= 0 5 -----H 2. TOT AL Score -opportunity for providing habitat I 11 I Add the scores from H2.l,H2.2, H2.3, H2.4 I I -----TOT AL for H I from page 14 9 -----Total Score for Habitat Functions -add the points for H I, H 2 and record the result on 20 p. I Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 17 August2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 A Wetland name or number ... __ CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described below and circle the appropriate answers and Category. Wetland Type Category Check off any criteria that apply to the wetland. Circle the Category when the aooropriate criteria are met. SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands (seep. 86) Does the wetland unit meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? -The dominant water regime is tidal, -Vegetated, and -With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. YES= Go to SC I.I NO X SC 1.1 Is the wetland unit within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, Cat. I National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? YES = Cate1mrv I X NO !!:O to SC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland unit at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? YES = Category I NO = Category II Cat. I -The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, Cat. II cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10% cover of non-native plant species. If the non-native Spartina spp. are the only species that cover more than 10% of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual Dual rating (Vll). The area of Spartina would be rated a Category II while the rating relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a 1/11 Category I. Do not, however, exclude the area of Spartina in determining the size threshold of l acre. -At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a I 00 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. -The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands . . Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 18 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 A Wetland name or number __ SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands (seep. 87) Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland unit being rated in a Section/Township/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? (this question is used to screen out most sites before you need to contact WNHP/DNR) S/Tffi. information from Appendix D _ or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site _ YES __ -contact WNHP/DNR (seep. 79) and go to SC 2.2 NO._X_ SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? YES= Category I NO _x___not a Heritage Wetland SC 3.0 Bogs (seep. 87) Does the wetland unit ( or any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify if the wetland is a bog. I/you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. 1. Does the unit have organic soil horizons (i.e. layers of organic soil), either peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils)? Yes - go to Q. 3 X No -go to Q. 2 2. Does the unit have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on a lake or pond? Yes -go to Q. 3 X No -Is not a bog for purpose of rating 3. Does the unit have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND other plants, if present, consist of the "bog" species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation (more than 30% of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3 )? Yes-Is a bog for purpose ofrating X No -go to Q. 4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16" deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the "bog" plant species in Table 3 are present, the wetland is a bog. 1. ls the unit forested(> 30% cover) with sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Englemann's spruce, or western white pine, WITH any of the species (or combination of species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover(> 30% coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover)? 2. YES = Category I No X Is not a bog for purpose of rating Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 19 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 Cat. I Cat. I A Wetland name or number __ SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands (seep. 90) Does the wetland unit have at least 1 acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its junctions. -Old-growth forests: (west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/acre (20 trees/hectare) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of32 inches (81 cm) or more. NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests. Two-hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and "OR" so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. -Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are 80-200 years old OR have average diameters (dbh) exceeding 21 inches (53cm); crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity oflarge downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth. YES = Category I Cat. I NO X not a forested wetland with special characteristics SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (seep. 91) Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? -The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks -The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured near the bottom) YES = Go to SC 5.1 NO ..X.. not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1 Does the wetland meets all of the following three conditions? -The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of invasive plant species (see list of invasive species on p. 74). -At least% of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. -The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre (4350 square feet) YES= Category I NO = Category II Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 20 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 Cat. I Cat. II A Wetland name or number __ SC 6.0 Interdunal Wetlands (seep. 93) Is the wetland unit west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? YES -go to SC 6.1 NO X not an interdunal wetland for rating If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: • Long Beach Peninsula-lands west of SR 103 • Grayland-Westport-lands west of SR 105 • Ocean Shores-Copalis-lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is once acre or larger? YES = Category II X NO -go to SC 6.2 SC 6.2 Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and 1 acre? YES = Category III Category of wetland based on Spech1lCharactenstics Choose the "highest" rating if wetland falls into several categories, .and record on p. 1. If you answetedNOfor all tvnes enter ''NotAnnlicable" on n.l Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 21 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 Cat. II Cat. Ill B Wetland name or number __ WETLAND RATING FORM-WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2 · Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users Updated Oct 2008 with the new WDFW definitions for priority habitats Name of wetland (if known): _w_e_tl_an_d_B ___________ Date of site visit: 0412312009 Rated by Adam Gale and Joe Pursley Trained by Ecology? Y esX No_ Date of training May 2007 SEC: 29 TWNSHP: 24 N RNGE: _:_:_ Is Sff/R in Appendix D? Yes_ NoX M f ti d ·t F. Est,·mated s·1ze 0· 1 Acre ap o we an um : ,gure __ SUMMARY OF RA TING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland I_ II_ IIIX IV_ Category I = Score >= 7 0 Category II = Score 51-69 Category III = Score 30-5 0 Catei.orv N = Score < 30 Score for Water Quality Functions 4 ~----1 Score for Hydrologic Functions 24 ~----1 Score for Habitat Functions 14 1--..... TOT AL score for Functions 42 Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland I_ II_ Does not Apply X Final Category c,,oodre ••••~•· are,o,y rrom ,..,.) [:] s ummarvo fb .. :t: b th as1c m ormation a out tl d ewe an urut Wetland Unit has Special Wetland HGM Class Characteristics used for Rating Estuarine Depressional 'x Natural Heritai.e Wetland Riverine Bog Lake-fringe Mature Forest Slooe Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal Lagoon Freshwater Tidal Interdunal None of the above X Check if unit has multi pie HGM classes oresent Wetland Rating Form-western Washington l version 2 To be used with Ecology Publication 04-06-025 August 2004 B Wetland name or number __ Does the wetland unit being rated meet any of the criteria below? If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland. . .·. .. Check List for Wetlands That Ma.y Need Additional Protection YES (in addition to the orotectionrecommended for its cateo:orv) '. SPl. Has the wetland unit been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered animal or plant species (I'IE species)? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the annronriate state or federal database. SP2. Has the wedand unit been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or Endangered animal species? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are categorized as Cateaorv I Natural Heritage Wetlands (see u. 19 of data form). SP3. Does the wedand unit contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WDFW for the state? SP4. Does the wedand unit have a local signiflcance in addition to its functions? For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having special significance. To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the Hydrogeomorphic Class of the wetland being rated. ' NO X X X X The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. See p. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 2 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 Angust2004 B Wetland name or number __ Classification of Wetland Units in Western Washington lfthe hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the .entire unit being rated,.you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions l-7 apply, and go to Question 8 . .. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during floods)? NO -go to 2 YES -the wetland class is Tidal Fringe If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? YES -Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO -Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) If your wedand can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wedands. !fit is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wedand. Wetlands that were called estuarine In the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the term "Estuarine" wetland is kept. Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Category I and II estuarine wetlands have changed (see p. ) . 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. NO -go to 3 YES -The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a "Flats" wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet both of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any vegetation on the surface) at least 20 acres (8 ha) in size; _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m)? NO -go to 4 YES -The wetland class is Lake-fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? XThe wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), XThe water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks. ~_The water leaves the wetland without being impounded? NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type ofwedands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3ft diameter and less than 1 foot deep}. NO -go to 5 YES -The wetland class is Slope Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 3 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 B Wetland name or number __ 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? __ The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river __ The overbank flooding occurs at least once every two years. NOTE: The riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding. NO -go to 6 YES -The wetland class is Riverine 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at some time during the year. This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO-go to 7 YES-The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding. The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO -go to 8 YES -The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM clases. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDRO LOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM Classes within the wetland unit being rated HGM Class to Use inRatine Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Deoressional Denressional Slone + Lake-frin!!e Lake-frin!!e Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional Deoressional + Lake-frin!!e Deoressional Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under wetland wetlands with special characteristics If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or if you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 4 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 B Wetland name or number __ D ·. · Depressional and Flats Wetlands . WATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS -Indicators thatthe wetland unit functions to ·. imoro.ve water oualitv · .. ·· D D 1. Does the wetland unit have the uotential to improve water quality? D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: D Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points= 3 Unit has an intermittently flowing, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points= 2 Unit has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet (permanently flowing) points = 1 Unit is a "flat" depression (Q. 7 on key), or in the Flats class, with permanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch points= 1 (If ditch is not permanently flowing treat unit as "intermittently flowing") Provide photo or dr awinq S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface (or duff layer) is clay or organic (use NRCS D definitions) YES points= 4 NO points= 0 D 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation (emergent, shrub, and/or forest Cowardin class) D Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation>= 95% of area points= 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation > = 1/2 of area points= 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation > = 1/10 of area points= I Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation <1/10 of area points= 0 Map or Cowardin veaetation classes D l, 4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation. D This is the area of the wetland unit that is ponded for at least 2 months, but dries out sometime during the year. Do not count the area that is permanently ponded. Estimate area as the average condition 5 out of JO yrs. ' Area seasonally ponded is > \12 total area of wetland points= 4 Area seasonally ponded is > '4 total area of wetland points= 2 Area seasonally ponded is < '4 total area of wetland points= 0 Mao of Hvdroperiods D Total forD I Add the points in the boxes above D D 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to improve water quality? Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland. Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants coming from several sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity. -Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft X Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland -Tilled fields or orchards within 150 ft of wetland -A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas, residential areas, farmed fields, roads, or clear-cut logging -Residential, urban areas, golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland -Wetland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen -Other YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is I D TOTAL -Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from DI by D2 Add score to table on p. 1 Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 5 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 Points (only 1 score per box) (seep.38} Figure_ 2 0 Figure_ 0 Figure_ 0 -----I 2 I -----(seep. 44) multiplier 2 -- 4 B Wetland name or number __ D Depressional and Flats Wetlands HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS -Indicators. that the wetland unit functions to reduce flooding and stream dei:rradation D 3. Does the wetland unit have the gotential to reduce flooding and erosion? D D 3.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland unit Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving It (no outlet) points= 4 Unit has an intermittently flowing, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points= 2 Unit is a "flat" depression (Q. 7 on key), or in the Flats class, with permanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch points= I (If ditch is no/ permanently flowing Jreat unit as "intermittently flowing '1 Unit has an unconstricted, or slll!htly constricted, surface outlet ( oermanendy Oowinul points = 0 D D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outiet. For units with no outiet measure from the smface of permanent water or deepest part (if dry}. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points= 7 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland" points= 5 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points= 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points= 3 Unit is flat (yes to Q. 2 or Q. 7 on key) but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points= 1 Marks of pondinl! less than 0.5 ft points= 0 D D 3.3 Contribution of wetland unit to storage in the watershed Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetiand unit itself. The area of the basin is less than IO times the area of unit points= 5 The area of the basin is IO to 100 times the area of the unit points= 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points= 0 Entire unit is in the FLA TS class ooints = 5 D Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above D D 4. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? Answer YES if the unit is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage, or reduction in water velocity, it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Answer NO if the water coming into the wetland is controlled by a structure such as flood gate, tide gate, flap valve, reservoir etc. OR you estimate that more than 90% of the water in the wetland is from groundwater in areas where damaging groundwater flooding does not occur. Note which of the following indicators of opportunity apply. -Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems -Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems -Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might otherwise flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems ~ Other Overflows to Lake Washington YES multiolier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 D TOTAL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4 Add score to table on p. I Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 6 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 Points (only 1 score per box) (seep.46) 2 7 3 -----I 12 I -----(seep. 49) multiplier 2 24 B Wetland name or number __ These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS -Indicato.rs that unit functions to provide important habitat H l. Does the wetland unit have the potential to provide habitat for many species? H 1.1 Vegetation structure (seep. 72) Check the types of vegetation dasses present (as defined by Cowardin)-Size threshold for each class is !4 acre or more than 10% of the area if unit is smaller than 2. 5 acres. __ Aquatic bed ___2CEmergent plants ___2CScrub/shrub (areas where shrubs have >30% cover) __ Forested (areas where trees have >30% cover) lf the unit has a forested class check if: __ The forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the forested polygon Add the number of vegetation structures that qualif'y. lf you have: Map of Cowardin vegetation classes H 1.2. Hydroperiods (seep. 73) 4 structures or more 3 structures 2 structures 1 structure poiots = 4 poiots = 2 poiots = 1 ooiots = 0 Check the types of water regimes {hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or % acre to count. (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods} ..X..Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present ..X..Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present points= 3 poiots = 2 point= 1 poiots = 0 __ Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present __ Saturated only 1 type present __ Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland __ Seasonally flowing stream io, or adjacent to, the wetland __ Lake-fringe wetland = 2 points __ Freshwater tidal wedand = 2 points Map of hydroperiods H 1.3. Richness of Plant Species (seep. 75) Count the number of plant species io the wetland that cover at least 10 ft 2 • (different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold) You do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Mi/foil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, If you counted: > 19 species List species below if you want to: 5 -19 species < 5 species Canadian Thisde points= 2 poiots = 1 points= 0 Points {only 1 SC<lre per box) Figure_ 1 Figure_ 1 1 3 Total for page __ _ Wetland Rating Farm -western Washington 13 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 B Wetland name or number __ H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats (seep. 76) igure _ Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include openwater or mudflats) is high, medium, low, or none. C) 0 None = 0 points Low= 1 point Moderate = 2 points ~:__,_ / [riparian braided channels] NOTE: If you have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water the ratin is alwa s "hi ". Use ma of Cowardin ve elation classes H 1.5. Special Habitat Features: (seep. 77) Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points you ptit Into the next column. __ Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (>4in. diameter and 6 ft long). __ Standing snags (diameter at the bottom > 4 inches) in the wetland __ Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft (lm) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the unit, for at least 33 ft (!Om) -..X_Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet turned grey/brown) __ At least \ii acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated. (structures for egg-laying by amphibians) __ Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in each stratum of plants NOTE: The 20 % stated In early printings of the manual on page 78 is an error. 2 1 r-------------=-===-=------------,-----+----H l. TOT AL Score -potential for providing habitat Add the scores from Hl.1, Hl.2, Hl.3, HJ.4, Hl.5 ~-----------------------~-~--~-~-------~ 6 Comments Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 14 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 B Wetland name or number __ H 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species? H 2.1 Buffers (seep. 80) Figure_ Choose the description that hest represents condition of buffer of wetland unit. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See text for def1nition of "undisturbed. " -100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no-grazing, no landscaping, no daily buman use) Points = 5 -100 m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 50% circumference. Points = 4 -50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% circumference. Points = 4 -100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 25% circumference, . Points= 3 X 50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for > 50% circumference. Points = 3 If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above -No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft) of wetland> 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points= 2 -No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >50% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 -Heavy grazing in buffer. Points= 1 -Vegetated buffers are <2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference (e.g. tilled fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points = 0. -Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points= 1 3 Aerial ohoto showino buffers H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (seep. 81) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads, paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor). YES= 4 points (go to H 2.3) NO = go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 50ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are al least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake-fringe wetland, if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? YES = 2 points (go to H 2.3) NO = H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 1~ the wetland: within 5 mi (8km) of a brackish or salt water estuary OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasture (>40 acres) OR within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? 1 YES = I point NO = 0 points 4 Total for page __ _ Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 15 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 B Wetland name or number __ H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW (see new and complete descriptions ofWDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in the PHS report http://wdfw.wa.gov/hablphslist.htm) Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft (100m) of the wetland unit? NOTE: the connections do not have to be relatively undisturbed. __ Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.4 ha (1 acre). _x_modiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 152). __ Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. __ Old-growth/Mature forests: (Old-growth west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 20 trees/ha (8 trees/acre) > 81 cm (32 in) dbh or> 200 years of age. {Mature forests) Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm (21 in) dbh; crown cover may be less that 100%; crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth; 80 -200 years old west of the Cascade crest. __ Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158). __ Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. __ Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non-forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161). __ Instream: The combination of physical. biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. __ Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitars and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report: pp. 167-169 and glossary in Appendix A). __ Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. __ Cliffs: Greater than 7 .6 m (25 ft) high and occurring below 5000 ft. __ Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 -2.0 m (0.5 -6.5 ft), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. __ Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of> 51 cm (20 in) in western Washington and are> 2 m (6.5 ft) in height. Priority logs are> 30 cm (12 in) in diameter at the largest end, and> 6 m (20 ft) long. If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats = 4 points If wetland has 2 priority habitats = 3 points If wetland has 1 priority habitat = 1 point No habitats = 0 points Note: All vegetated wedands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list. Nearby wetlands are addressed in question H 2.4) Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 16 August2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 1 B Wetland name or number __ H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland that best fits) (seep. 84) There are at least 3 other wetlands within 1f., mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields, or other development. points= 5 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within 11! mile points= 5 There are at least 3 other wetlands within 11! mile, BUT the connections between them are disturbed points= 3 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetland within 11! mile points= 3 There is at least 1 wetland within \12 mile. points= 2 There are no wetlands within 11! mile. points= 0 H 2. TOTAL Score -opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores from H2.l,H2.2, H2.3, H2.4 TOTAL for H 1 from page 14 Total Score for Habitat Functions -add the points for H 1, H 2 and record the result on p. 1 Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 17 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August2004 3 -----I 8 I I I ----- 6 ----- 14 B Wetland name or number __ CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please detennine if the wedand meets the attributes described below and circle the appropriate answers and Category. Wetland Type Category Check off any criteria that apply to the wetland. Circle the Category when the annrooriate criteria are met. SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands (seep. 86) Does the wetland unit meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? -The dominant water regime is tidal, -Vegetated, and -With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. YES= Go to SC 1.1 NO __x_ SC 1.1 Is the wetland unit within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, Cat. I National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? YES = Categorv I XNOgotoSC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland unit at least l acre in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? YES = Category I NO= Category II Cat. I -The wetland ls relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, Cat.IT cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10% cover of non-native plant species. If the non-native Spartina spp. are the only species that cover more than 10% of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual Dual rating (UII). The area of Spartina would be rated a Category II while the rating relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a I/II Category I. Do no't, however, exclude the area of Spartina in determining the size threshold of 1 acre. -At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. -The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 18 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 B Wetland name or number __ SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands (seep. 87} Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland unit being rated in a Section/fownship/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? (this question is used to screen out most sites before you need to contact WNHP/DNR) S/T/R information from Appendix D _ or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site _ YES __ -contact WNHP/DNR (seep. 79) and go to SC 2.2 NOX SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? YES = Category I NO _x_not a Heritage Wetland SC 3.0 Bogs (seep. 87} Does the wetland unit (or any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify if the wed and is a bog. If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. 1. Does the unit have organic soil horizons (i.e. layers of organic soil), either peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the frrst 32 inches of the soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils)? Yes - gntoQ.3 X~-~toQ2 2. Does the unit have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on a lake or pond? Yes -go to Q. 3 X No -Is not a bog for purpose of rating 3. Does the unit have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND other plants, if present, consist of the "bog" species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation (more than 30% of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)? Yes -Is a bog for purpose of rating X No -go to Q. 4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16" deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the "bog" plant species in Table 3 are present, the wetland is a bog. 1. Is the unit forested (> -30% cover) with sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Englemann' s spruce, or western white pine, WITH any of the species (or combination of species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover(> 30% coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover}? 2. YES = Category I NoX Is not a bog for purpose of rating Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 19 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 Cat. I Cat. I B Wetland name or number __ SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands (seep. 90} Does the wetland unit have at least 1 acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wedand based on its functions. -Old-growth forests: (west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/acre (20 trees/hectare) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of32 inches (81 cm) or more. NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests. Two-hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and "OR" so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. -Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are 80 -200 years old OR have average diameters (dbh) exceeding 21 inches (53cm); crown cover maybe less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth. YES = Category I NO X not a forested wetland with special characteristics SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (seep. 91} Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? -The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks -The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured near the bottom) YES= Go to SC 5.1 NOX not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1 Does the wetland meets all of the following three conditions? -The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of invasive plant species (see list of invasive species on p. 7 4). -At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. -The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre ( 4350 square feet) YES = Category I NO = Category II Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 20 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 Cat. I Cat. I Cat. II B Wetland name or number __ SC 6.0 Interdunal Wetlands (seep. 93} Is the wetland unit west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? YES -go to SC 6.1 NO X not an interdunal wetland for rating If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: • Long Beach Peninsula-lands west of SR 103 • Grayland-Westport-lands west of SR 105 • Ocean Shores-Copalis-lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is once acre or larger? YES = Category II X NO -go to SC 6.2 Cat. II SC 6.2 Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and 1 acre? YES = Category III Cat. III Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics Choose the "highest" ratingifwetlandfalls into several categories, and record on p.1. Ifvouanswered NO for all tvoes enter ''NotAnnlicable" on p,l Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 21 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 C Wetland name or number·-- WETLAND RATING FORM-WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2 -Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users Updated Oct 2008 with the new WDFW definitions for priority habitats Name of wetland (if known): _w_e_tl_a_nd_c ___________ Date of site visit: 0412312009 Rated by Adam Gale and Joe Pursley Trained by Ecology? YesXNo_ Date of training May 2007 SEC: 29 TWNSHP: 24 N RNGE: ~ Is S/I'/R in Appendix D? Yes_ NoX Map of wetland unit: Figure__ Estimated size < 0·1 Acre SUMMARY OF RA TING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland I_ II_ III_ IV X Category I= Score >=70 Category II = Score 51-69 Category III = Score 30-50 Category IV = Score < 30 Score for Water Quality Functions 4 1-----1 Score for Hydrologic Functions 16 f----- Score for Habitat Functions 6 i--.....i TOTAL score for Functions 26 Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland I_ II_ Does not ApplyX Final Category ("'=' "'' "lrlghe,t" ~t,go,y from••~•) [:] s ummarvo fb .. f b th as1c m ormation a out ti d ewe an umt Wetland Unit has Special Wetland I{GM Class · Characteristics used for Ratin!! Estuarine Deoressional 'x Natural Heritage Wetland Riverine Bog Lake-fringe Mature Forest Slone Old Growtli Forest Flats Coastal Lagoon Freshwater Tidal Interdunal None of the above X Check if unit has multiple HGM classes present Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 1 version 2 To be used with Ecology Publication 04-06-025 August 2004 C Wetland name or number __ Does the wetland unit being rated meet any of the criteria below? If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland. Check List for Wetlands That May Need Additional Protection YES (in addition to the orotection recoOUtiendedfor its catee:orv) SPl. Has the wetland unit been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered animal or plant spedes (I!E spedes)? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the annronriate state or federal database. SP2. Has the wetland unit been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or Endangered animal species? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are cate1mrized as Cate1mrv I Natural Herita11:e Wetlands (seen. 19 of data fonn). SP3. Does the wetland unit contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WDFW for the state? SP4. Does the wetland unit have a local significance in addition to its functions? For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having special significance. To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the Hydrogeomorphic Class of the wedand being rated. . NO .. X X X X The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic Class of a wetland can be detennined using the key below. Seep. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Wetland Rating Form-western WasWngton 2 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August2004 C Wetland name or number __ Classification of Wetland Units in Western Washington If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire.unit being xated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologiccriteria in questions l-7 apply, and go to Question 8 . .. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides {i.e. except during floods)? NO -go to 2 YES -the wetland class is Tidal Fringe If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? YES -Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO -Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. Ifit is Saltwater Tidal Fringe ii is rated as an Estuarine wetland. Wetlands that were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the term "Estuarine" wetland is kept. Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Category I and II estuarine wetlands have changed (see p. ) . 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. NO -go to 3 YES -The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a "Flats" wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet both of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any vegetation on the surface) at least 20 acres (8 ha) in size; _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m}? NO -go to 4 YES -The wetland class is Lake-fringe (Lacustrine Fringe} 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? X The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), X The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks. __ The water leaves the wetland without being impounded? NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks {depressions are usually <3ft diameter and Jess than 1 foot deep}. NO -go to 5 YES-The wetland class is Slope Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 3 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 C Wetland name or number __ 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? __ The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river __ The overhank flooding occurs at least once every two years. . NOTE: The riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding. NO -go to 6 YES -The wetland class is Riverine 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at some time during the year. This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. · NO -go to 7 YES -The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression-and no overbank flooding. The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO -go to 8 YES -The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM clases. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a wne of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGMCJasses within the wetland unit beinR rated · HGMClassi<iUseinRatln!! - Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Slope + Lake-frin11:e Lake-frin11:e Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional Depressional + Lake-frimre Depressional Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under wetland wetlands with special characteristics If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or if you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 4 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August2004 C Wetland name or number·-- D Depressional and Flats Wetlands . . WATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS -Indicators that.the wethind uni( functions to im1Jrove water. aualitv .. ·· D D 1. Does the wetland unit have the uotential to improve water quality? D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: D Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points= 3 Unit has an intermittently flowing, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points= 2 Unit has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet (permanently flowing) points = 1 Unit is a "flat" depression (Q. 7 on key), or in the Flats class, with permanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch points= 1 (If ditch is not permanently flowing treat unit as "intermittently flowing'? Provide photo or drawin ~ S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface (or duff layer) is clay or organic (use NRCS D definitions) YES points= 4 NO points= 0 D 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation (emergent, shrub, and/or forest Coward in class} D Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation > = 95% of area points= 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation>= 1/2 of area points= 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation>= 1/10 of area points= 1 Wetland has persistent. ungrazed vegetation <1110 of area points= 0 Mao of Cowardln vei:ietation classes Dl.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation. D This is the area of the wed and unit that ls ponded for at least 2 months, but dries out sometime during the year. Do not count the area that is pennanentiy ponded. Estimate area as the average condition 5 out of 10 yrs. Area seasonally ponded is > 'h total area of wetland points= 4 Area seasonally pon.ded is > \4 total area of wetland points= 2 Area seasonally ponded is < \4 total area of wetland points= 0 Mao of Hvdrooeriods D Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above D D 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to improve water quality? Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland. Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants coming from several sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity. -Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft X Unlreated stormwater discharges to wetland -Tilled fields or orchards within 150 ft of wetland -A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas, residential areas, farmed fields, roads, or clear-cut logging -Residential, urban areas, golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland -Wetland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen -Other YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 D TOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from Dl by D2 Add score to 111.ble on TJ, 1 Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 5 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 Points {only l scote pc, box) (seep.JS) Figure_ 2 0 Figure_ 0 Figure_ 0 -----I 2 I -----(seep. 44) multiplier 2 -- 4 C Wetland name or number __ D Depressional and Flats Wetlands HYDRO LOGIC FUNCTIONS -Indicators that the wetland unit functions to reduce floodin!! and stream deoradation D 3. Does the wetland unit have the !lOtential to reduce flooding and erosion? D D 3.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland unit Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points= 4 Unit has an intermittently flowing, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points= 2 Unit is a ''flat" depression (Q. 7 on key), or in the Flats class, with permanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch points= I 1/f ditch is not permanently flowing treat unit as "intermittently flowing") Unit has an unconstricted, or s[inl.tJv constricted, surface outlet -,n•rmanentiv flowinn\ noints-0 D D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For units with no outlet measure from the surface of permanent water or deepest part (if dry). Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points= 7 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland" points= 5 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points= 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points= 3 Unit is flat (yes to Q. 2 or Q. 7 on key} but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points= 1 Marks of oondinfl less than 0.5 ft Tlflints -0 D D 3.3 Contribution of wetland unit to storage in the watershed Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of unit points= 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points= 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points= 0 Entire unit is in the FLATS class ooints = 5 D Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above D D 4. Does the wetland unit have the O!l!lOrtunity to reduce flooding and erosion? Answer YES if the unit is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage, or reduction in water velocity, it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Answer NO if the water coming into the wetland Is controlled by a structure such as flood gate, tide gate, flap valve, reservoir etc. OR you estimate that more than 90% of the water in the wetland is from groundwater in areas where damaging groundwater flooding does not occur. Note which of the following indicators of opportunity apply. -Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems -Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems -Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might otherwise flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems X Other Overflows to Wetland C and then Lake Washington YES multiolier is 2 NO multiolier is 1 D TOTAL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4 Add score to table on p. 1 Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 6 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August2004 Points (only I score per box) (seep.46) 2 3 3 -----I 8 I -----(seep. 49) multiplier 2 16 C Wetland name or number __ These questi.ons apply to wedands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS -Indicators that unit functions to proVide important habitat H 1. Does the wetland unit have the potential to proVide habitat for many species? H 1.1 Vegetation structure (seep. 72) Check the types of vegetation classes present (as defined by Cowardin}-Size threshold for each class is ij acre or more than 10% of the area if unit is smaller than 2.5 acres. __ Aquatic bed __ Emergent plants __ Scrub/shrub (areas where shrubs have >30% cover) __ Forested (areas where trees have >30% cover) If the unit has a forested class check if: __ The forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy. sub-canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the forested polygon Add the number of vegetation structures that qualif'y. If you have: Map of Cowartlin vegetation classes H 1.2. Hydroperlods (seep. 73) 4 structures or more 3 structures 2 structures I structure points= 4 points= 2 points= 1 ooints = 0 Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wedand. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wedand or * acre to count. (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods) ~Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present points= 3 points= 2 point= 1 points= 0 __ Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present __ Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present __ Saturated only 1 type present __ Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland __ Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland __ Lake-fringe wedand = 2 points __ Freshwater ddal wedand = 2 points Map of hydroperiods H 1.3. Richness of Plant Species (seep. 75) Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft 2 • of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold) You do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple looses/rife, If you counted: > 19 species List species below if you want to: 5 -19 species < 5 species (different patches Canadian Thisde points~ 2 points= I points= 0 Points (only I score per box) Figure_ 0 Figure_ 0 0 a Total for page __ _ Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 13 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 C Wetland name or number __ H 1.4. lnterspersion of habitats (seep. 76) igure _ Decide from the diagrams below whether ioterspersion between Cowardio vegetation classes {described io H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can ioclude open water or mudflats) is high, medium, low, or none. C) 0 0 None = 0 poiots Low= 1 poiot Moderate = 2 poiots ~- High = 3 poiots [riparian braided channels] NOTE: If you have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water the ratin is alwa s "hi ". Use ma of Cowardin ve elation classes H 1.5. Special Habitat Features: (seep. 77) Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points you put into the next column. __ Large, downed, woody debris withio the wetland (>4in. diameter and 6 ft long). __ Standing snags (diameter at the bottom> 4 inches) in the wetland __ Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft {2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft (Im) over a stream {or ditch) in, or contiguous with the unit, for at least 33 ft {10m) __ Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denniog (>30degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet turned grey/brown) __ At least % acre of thio-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated.(stroctures for egg-laying by amphibians) __ Invasive plants cover less than 25% of ihe wetland area io each stratum of plants 0 0 NOTE: The 20 % stated in early printings of the manual on page 78 is an error. ~------------_:~-,....:::------_:_-=----------~----H 1. TOT AL Score -potential for providing habitat I O I L..._ ___________ __;A~d=d~~=-e=~~o=re~s~k~o=m=H=l.~L~H~l~.~Z~H=l~.3~,~H~l~.4~,=H~l~.5:.........,I ____ J Comments Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 14 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 C Wetland name or number __ H 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species? H 2.1 Buffers (seep. 80) Figure_ Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland unit. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See text for definition of "undisturbed. " -100 m (330ft) ofrelatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no-grazing, no landscaping, no daily human use) Points ; 5 -I 00 m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 50% circumference. Points ; 4 -50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas. rocky areas, or open water >95% circumference. Points ; 4 -100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water> 25% circumference, . Points ; 3 -50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for > 50% circumference. Points ; 3 If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above X No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft) of wetland> 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points ; 2 -No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >50% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points ; 2 -Heavy grazing in buffer. Points ; 1 -Vegetated buffers are <2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference (e.g. tilled fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points ; 0. -Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points ; 1 2 Aerial ohoto showino buffers H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (seep. 81) H 2.2.1 ls the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads, paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor). YES; 4 points (go to H 2.3) NO ; go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 50ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? 0 R a Lake-fringe wetland, if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? YES ; 2 points (go to H 2.3) NO = H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 Is the wetland: within 5 mi (8km) of a brackish or salt water estuary OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasture (>40 acres) OR within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? 1 YES ; l point NO ; 0 points 3 Total for page __ _ Wetland Rating Form --western Washington 15 August2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 C Wetland name or number __ H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW (see new and complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found. in the PHS report http://wdfw. wa.govlhablphsllst.htm) Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft (100ml of the wetland unit? NOTE: the connections do not have to be relatively undisturbed. __ Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.4 ha (I acre). LBiodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 15Z). __ Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. __ Old-growth/Mature forests: (Old-growth west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 20 trees/ha (8 trees/acre) > 81 cm (32 in) dbh or> 200 years of age. <Mature forests) Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm (21 in) dbh; crown cover may be less that 100%; crown cover may be less that 100%; decay. decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth; 80 -200 years old west of the Cascade crest. __ Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 159). __ Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. __ Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non-forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161). __ Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. __ Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report: pp. 167-169 and glossary in Appendix A). __ Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. __ Cliffs: Greater than 7.6 m (25 ft) high and occurring below 5000 ft. __ Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 -2.0 m (0.5 -6.5 ft), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. __ Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of> 51 cm (20 in) in western Washington and are> 2 m (6.5 ft) in height. Priority logs are> 30 cm (12 in) in diameter at the largest end, and > 6 m (20 ft) long. If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats = 4 points If wetland has 2 priority habitats = 3 points If wetland has I priority habitat = 1 point No habitats = 0 points Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habirat hut are not included in this list. Nearby wetlands are addressed in question H 2.4) Wetland Ratlng Form-western Washington 16 August2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 1 C Wetland name or number __ H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland that best fits) (seep. 84) There are at least 3 other wetlands within ¥., mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields, or other development. points= 5 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within ¥., mile points= 5 There are at least 3 other wetlands within ¥., mile, BUT the connections between them are disturbed points= 3 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetland within Y2 mile points= 3 There is at least 1 wetland within ¥., mile. points= 2 There are no wetlands within Ill mile. points= 0 H 2. TOTAL Score -opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores from H2.l,H2.2, H2.3, H2.4 TOT AL for H 1 from page 14 Total Score for Habitat Functions -add the points for H 1, H 2 and record the result on p. 1 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 17 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 3 -----I 6 I I I ----- 0 ----- 6 C Wetland name or number __ CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please detennine if the wedand meets the attributes described below and circle the appropriate answers and Category. Wetland Type Category Check off any criteria that apply to the wetland. Circle the Category when the annropriate criteria are met. SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands (seep. 86} Does the wetland unit meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? -The dominant water regime is tidal, -Vegetated, and -With a salinity greater than 0.5 pp!. YES = Go to SC 1.1 NO..X.. SC 1.1 Is the wetland unit within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, Cat. I National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? YES = Categorv I XNOgotoSC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland unit at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? YES = Category I NO = Category II Cat. I -The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, Cat. II cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10% cover of non-native plant species. If the non-native Spartina spp. are the only species that cover more than 10% of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual Dual rating (I/II). The area of Spartina would be rated a Category II while the rating relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a I/II Category I. Do not, however, exclude the area of Spartina in determining the size threshold of I acre. -At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. -The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 18 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 C Wetland name or number __ SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands (seep. 87) Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland unit being rated in a Section/Township/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? {this question is used to screen out most sites before you need to contact WNHPIDNR) SfT/R information from Appendix D _ or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site _ YES __ -contact WNHPillNR (see p. 79) and go to SC 2.2 NOX SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? YES = Category I NO --X_not a Heritage Wetland SC 3.0 Bogs (seep. 87) Does the wetland unit (or any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify if the wedand is a bog. If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. 1. Does the unit have organic soil horizons (i.e. layers of organic soil), either peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils)? Yes - ~MQ.3 X~-~MQ.2 2. Does the unit have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on a lake or pond? Yes -go to Q. 3 X No -Is not a bog for purpose of rating 3. Does the unit have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND other plants, if present, consist of the "bog" species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation (more than 30% of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)7 Yes -Is a bog for purpose ofrating X No -go to Q. 4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16" deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the "bog" plant species in Table 3 are present, the wetland is a bog. J. Is the unit forested (> 30% cover) with sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Englemann's spruce, or western white pine, WITH any of the species (or combination of species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover (> 30% coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover)? 2. YES= Category I NoX Is not a bog for purpose of rating Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 19 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 Cat. I Cat. I C Wetland name or number __ SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands (seep. 90} Does the wetland unit have at least 1 acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wedand based on its functions. -Old-growth forests: (west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/acre (20 trees/hectare) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of 32 inches (81 cm) or more. NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests. Two-hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and "OR" so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. -Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are 80-200 years old OR have average diameters (dbh) exceeding 21 inches (53cm); crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth. YES = Category I Cat. I NO X not a forested wetland with special characteristics SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (seep. 91) Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? -The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks -The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured near the bottom} YES= Go to SC 5.1 NO X not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1 Does the wetland meets all of the following three conditions? -The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of invasive plant species (see list of invasive species on p. 74). -At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. -The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre (4350 square feet) YES= Category I NO= Category II Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 20 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 Cat. I Cat. II C Wetland name or number __ SC 6.0 Interdunal Wetlands {seep. 93) Is the wetland unit west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? YES -go to SC 6.1 NO X not an interdunal wetland for rating If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wedand based on its functions. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: • Long Beach Peninsula-lands west of SR I 03 • Grayland-Westport-lands west of SR 105 • Ocean Shores-Copalis-lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is once acre or larger? YES = Category II X NO -go to SC 6.2 Cat. II SC 6.2 Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between O .1 and 1 acre? YES = Category III Cat. III Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics Choose the "highest''rating if wetland falls into sff\Jeral categories, and record on p.L . Ifvpu answered NO for alltvPes enter "Not Annlicable" on p.l Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 21 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 D Wetland name or number __ WETLAND RATING FORM-WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2 -Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users Updated Oct 2008 with the new WDFW definitions for priority habitats Name of wetland (if known): _w_e_tl_a_nd_D ___________ Date of site visit: o4i3oi2oo 9 Rated by Adam Gale and Joe Pursley Trained by Ecology? YesXNo_ Date of training May 2007 SEC: 29 TWNSHP: 24 N RNGE:~ IsS/f/RinAppendixD? Yes_ No.X Map of wetland unit: Figure__ Estimated size 0·6 Acre SUMMARY OF RATING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland I_ II_ IIIX IV_ Category I= Score >=70 Category II = Score 51-69 Category III = Score 30-50 Category IV = Score < 30 Score for Water Quality Functions 18 Score for H ydrologic Functions 12 ,_ __ _, Score for Habitat Functions 24 r----i TOT AL score for Functions 54 Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland I_ II_ Does not Apply X Final Category (<hoo~.., "h;gb,.t" ut,gory from obo~) D s fb ummarvo ti b h tl d asic in ormation a out t e we an unit Wetland Unit has Special Wetland HGM Class Characteristics used for Rating Estuarine Depressional Natural Herita11:e Wetland Riverine Bog Lake-frin11:e X Mature Forest Slope Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal La11:oon Freshwater Tidal Interdunal None of the above X Check if unit has multiple X HGM classes oresent Wetland Rating Form-· western Washington 1 version 2 To be used with Ecology Publication 04-06-025 August 2004 D Wetland name or number __ Does the wetland unit being rated meet any of the criteria below? . If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland. Check List fo~ Wetlands Tha.t MayNeed AdditionalProtectiob >YES (in addition to the orotection recommended fol'its catei:rorv)f · .. . •· . SP!. Has the wetland unit been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered animal or plant species (I'IE species)? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the annronriate state or federal database. SP2. Has the wetland unit been documented as habitat for any State listed . Threatened or Endangered animal species? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are cate1mrized as Cate1mrv I Natural Herita2e Wetlands (seen. 19 of data form). SP3. Does the wetland unit contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WFW for the state? SP4. Does the wetland unit have a local significance in addition to its functions? For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having special significance. To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the Hydrogeomorphic Class of the wetland being rated. .··· NO . X X X X The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. See p. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 2 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 D Wetland name or number __ Classification of Wetland Units in Western Washington If the hydrologlc criteria listed in, each question do not apply to the entire unit being .ratl!tl;youprobably have a unit with multiple HGM classes .. In this case, identify which hydrdlogic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question 8 . . I. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during floods)? NO -go to 2 YES -the wetland class is Tidal Fringe If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? YES -Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO -Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) If your wedand can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wedands. lfit is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wetland. Wetlands that were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the term "Estuarine" wetland is kept. Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Category I and II estuarine wetlands have changed (see p. ) . 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. NO -go to 3 YES -The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a "Flats" wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet both of the following criteria? X The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any vegetation on the surface} at least 20 acres (8 ha) in size; X At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m)? NO -go to 4 YES -The wetland class is Lake-fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? XThe wetland is on a slope (slope can be very graduab, XThe water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks. _6_.The water leaves the wetland without being impounded? NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type ofwedands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks {depressions are usually <311 diameter and Jess than 1 foot deep}. NO -go to 5 YES -The wetland class is Slope Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 3 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August2004 D Wetland name or number __ 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? __ The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river __ The overbank flooding occurs at least once every two years. NOTE: The riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding. NO -go to 6 YES -The wetland class is Riverine 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at some time during the year. This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO -go to 7 YES -The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding. The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO -go to 8 YES -The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM clases. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDRO LOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGMClasses within the wetland unit befriv rated . H9MCJass to Use irJ.Rat1nu Slooe + Riverine Riverine Slone + Deoressional Deoressional Slone + Lake-frin!!e Lake-frin!!e Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional Deoressional + Lake-frin!!e Deoressional Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under wetland wetlands with special characteristics If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or if you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 4 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 D Wetland name or number __ L Lake-fringe Wetlands WATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS -Indicators that the wetland unit functions to improve water quality . . L L 1. Does the wetland unit have the gotential to improve water quality? L L 1.1 Average width of vegetation along the lakeshore (use polygons of Cowardin classes): Vegetation is more than 33ft (10m} wide points= 6 Vegetation is more than 16 (5m) wide and <33ft points= 3 Vegetation is more than 6ft (2m) wide and <16 ft points= 1 Vegetation is less than 6 ft wide points= 0 Map of Cowardin classes with widths marked L L 1.2 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland: choose the appropriate description that results in the highest points, and do not include any open water in your estimate of coverage. The herbaceous plants can be either the dominant form or as an understo,y in a shrub or forest community. These are not Cowardin classes. Area of Cover ls total cover in the unit, but it can be in patches. NOTE: Herbaceous does not include aquatic bed. Cover of herbaceous plants is >90% of the vegetated area points= 6 Cover of herbaceous plants is >213 of the vegetated area points= 4 Cover of herbaceous plants is > 1/3 of the vegetated area points= 3 Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed or herbaceous covers > 2/3 unit points= 3 Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed in > 113 vegetated area points= 1 Aquatic bed vegetation and open water cover > 2/3 of the unit points= 0 Map with oolvaons of different veQetation tunes L Add the points in the boxes above L L 2. Does the wetland have the oggortunity to improve water quality? Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in the lake water, or polluted Points (only I score per box) (seep.59) Figure_ 6 Figure_ 3 -----I 9 -----(see p.61) surface water flowing through the unit to the lake. Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants coming from several so~; but any single source would qualify as opportunity. -Wetland is along the shores of a lake or reservoir that does not meet water quality standards -Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft X Polluted water discharges to wetland along upland edge -Tilled fields or orchards within 150 feet of wetland -Residential or urban areas are within 150 ft of wetland -Parks with grassy areas that are maintained, ballfields, golf courses (all within X 150 ft. of lake shore) Power boats with gasoline or diesel engines use the lake -Other YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 L TOTAL -Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from LI by L2 Add score to table on p. 1 Comments Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 9 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 multiplier 2 -- 18 I D Wetland name or number __ _ Lake~fringe Wetlands . ·.· Points . L HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS " Indicators that the wetlandtmitfunctions to (only !score per.bo,) reduce shoreline erosion . . .. . . . . • ... '"' : .. ',' ,'' L .-. ,,,. ____ ,,,,_, ·--,--:. L L 3. Does the wetland unit have the I!Otential to reduce shoreline erosion? (seep.62} L L 3 Distance along shore and average width of Cowardin classes along the lakeshore (do Figure_ not include aquatic bed}: (choose the highest scoring description that matches conditions in the wedand} > % of distance is shrubs or forest at least 33 ft (10m) wide points= 6 > % of distance is shrubs or forest at least 6 ft. (2 m} wide points= 4 > 1AI distance is shrubs or forest at least 33 ft (10m} wide points= 4 Vegetation is at least 6 ft (2m} wide (any type except aquatic bed) points= 2 Vegetation is less than 6 ft (2m) wide (any type except aquatic bed) points= 0 6 Aerial ohoto or mao with Cowardin veaetation classes -----L Record the points from the box above I 6 I -----L L 4. Does the wetland unit have the oooortunity to reduce erosion? Are there features along the shore that will be impacted if the shoreline erodes? Note (seep.63) which of the following conditions apply. X There are human structures and activities along the upland edge of the wetland (buildings, fields) that can be damaged by erosion. -There are undisturbed natural resources along the upland edge of the wetland (e.g. mature forests other wetlands) than can be damaged by shoreline erosion -Other multiplier YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 2 L TOTAL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from L 3 by L 4 Add score to table on p. 1 12 Comments Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 10 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 D Wetland name or number __ These questions apply to wedands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS -Indicators that unit functions to provide important habitat H I. Does the wetland unit have the potential to provide habitat for many species? H I.I Vegetation structure (seep. 72) Check the types of vegetation classes present (as defined by Cowardin)-Size threshold for each class is % acre or more than 10% of the area if unit is smaller than 2.5 acres. __ Aquatic bed -X..Emergent plants -X..Scrub/shrub (areas where shrubs have >30% cover) __ Forested (areas where trees have >30% cover) If the unit has a forested class check if: -X..The forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the forested polygon Add the number of vegetation structures that qualify. If you have: Map of Cowardin vegetation classes H 1.2. Hydroperiods (seep. 73) 4 structures or more 3 structures 2 structures I structure points= 4 points= 2 points= 1 points= 0 Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods} present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or % acre to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods) XPennanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present points= 3 points= 2 point= 1 points= 0 _x_seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present __ Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present __ Saturated only 1 type present __ Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland __ Seasonally flowing stream in, or a<ljacent to, the wetland ..x_ Lake-fringe wedand = 2 points __ Freshwater tidal wedand = 2 points Map of hydroperiods H 1.3. Richness of Plant Species (seep. 75) Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold) You do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple looses/rife, If you counted: > 19 species List species below if you want to: 5 -19 species < 5 species (different patches Canadian Thistle points= 2 points= I points= 0 Points {only 1 score per box) Figure_ 2 Figure_ 3 1 6 Total for page __ _ Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 13 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 D Wetland name or number __ H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats (seep. 76) igure _ Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, medium, low, or none. C) 0 0 None = 0 points Low= 1 point Moderate = 2 points · ....... ,,·· . ...... ,..v/ ~ .. c3pomS / ,.,...:..__] NOTE: If you have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water the ratio is alwa s "hi h". Use ma of Cowardin ve elation classes H 1.5. Special Habitat Features: (seep. 77) Check the habitat features that are present in the wedand. The number of checks is the number of points you put into the next column. _x_Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (>4in. diameter and 6 ft long). _x_standing snags (diameter at the bottom > 4 inches) in the wetland _x_undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft (Im) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the unit, for at least 33 ft (10m) __ Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet turned grey/brown) __ At least 14 acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated.{structures for egg-laying by amphibians) __ Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in each stratum of plants 3 3 NOTE: The 20 % stated in early printings of the manual on page 78 is an error. ~-------------=--=----=-------=--=----------~----H 1. TOTAL Score -potential for providing habitat I 12 I ...___ ___________ --=A~d=d~m=-e=sc=o~re=s~k~o~m~H=l=·~l,~H~l~.2~,~H=l~.3~,~H~l~.4~,=H=l~.5'---1.I ____ J Comments Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 14 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 D Wetland name or number~~ H 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species? H 2.1 Buffers (seep. 80) Figure _ Choose the descripdon that best represents condidon of buffer of wetland unit. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the radng. See text for definidon of "undisturbed. " -100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no-grazing, no landscaping, no daily human use) Points = 5 X 100 m (330 ft) ofrelatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 50% circumference. Points = 4 -50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% circumference. Points = 4 -100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 25% circumference, . Points = 3 -50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for > 50% circumference. Points = 3 If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above -No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft) of wetland > 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 -No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >50% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 -Heavy grazing in buffer. Points = 1 -Vegetated buffers are <2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference (e.g. tilled fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points = 0. -Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points = 1 4 Aerial photo showina buffers H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (seep. 81} H 2.2.1 ls the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads, paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor) . YES= 4 points (go to H 2.:!} NO= go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is tbe wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 50ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake-fringe wetland, if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? YES= 2 points (go to H 2.:!} NO; H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 Is the wetland: within 5 mi (8km) of a brackish or salt water estuary OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasture (>40 acres) OR within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? 2 YES= 1 oolnt NO= 0 ooints 6 Total for page, __ _ Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 15 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Ocl. 2008 August 2004 D Wetland name or number __ H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW (see new and complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in the PHS report http://wdfw.wa.gov!hablphsllst.htm) Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft (1 OOm) of the wetland unit? NOTE: the connections do not have to be relatively undisturbed. __ Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.4 ha (1 acre). _.X_Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 152). __ Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. __ Old-growth/Mature forests: (Old-growth west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 20 trees/ha (8 trees/acre) > 81 cm (32 in) dbh or> 200 years of age. (Mature forests) Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm (21 in) dbh; crown cover may be less that 100%; crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth; 80 -200 years old west of the Cascade crest. __ Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158). __ Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. __ Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non-forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161). __ Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. __ Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report: pp. 167-169 and glossary in Appendix A). __ Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human: __ Cliffs: Greater than 7.6 m (25 ft) high and occurring below 5000 ft. __ Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 -2.0 m (0.5 -6.5 ft), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. __ Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of> 51 cm (20 in) in western Washington and are > 2 m (6.5 ft) in height. Priority logs are > 30 cm (12 in) in diameter at the largest end, and > 6 m (20 ft) long. If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats = 4 points If wetland has 2 priority habitats = 3 points If wetland has 1 priority habitat = 1 point No habitats = 0 points Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not induded in this list. Nearby wetlands are addressed in question H 2.4} Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 16 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 1 D Wetland name or number __ H 2. 4 W ctland Landscape (choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland that best fits) (seep. 84} There arc at least 3 other wetlands within '12 mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields, or other development. points= 5 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within ¥., mile points= 5 There are at least 3 other wetlands within 1h mile, BUT the connections between them are disturbed points= 3 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetland within '12 mile points= 3 There is at least 1 wetland within '12 mile, points= 2 There are no wetlands within '12 mile. points= 0 H 2. TOTAL Score -opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores from H2.1,H2.2, H2.3, H2.4 TOTAL for H l from page 14 Total Score for Habitat Functions -add the points for H 1, H 2 and record the result on D. 1 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 17 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 5 -----I 12 I I I ----- 12 ----- 24 D Wetland name or number __ CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described below and circle the appropriate answers and Category. Wetland Type Category Check off any criteria. that apply to the wedand. Circle the Ca.tego.ry when the anoropria.te criteria a.re met. SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands (seep. 86) Does the wetland unit meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? -The dominant water regime is tidal, -Vegetated, and -With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. YES= Go to SC 1.1 NOX SC 1.1 Is the wetland unit within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, Cat. I National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? YES = Category I X NO go to SC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland unit at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? YES = Category I NO "' Category II Cat. I -The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, Cat. II cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10% cover of non-native plant species. If the non-native Spa.rtina. spp. are the only species that cover more than 10% of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual Dual rating (I/II). The area of Spartina would be rated a Category II while the rating relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a I/II Category I. Do not, however, exclude the area of Spartina in determining the size threshold of 1 acre. -At least'% of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. -The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 18 August2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 D Wetland name or number __ SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands (seep. 87} Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland unit being rated in a Section/Township/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? (this question is used to screen out most sites before you need to contact WNHPIDNR) S/T/R Information from Appendix D _ or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site _ YES __ -contact WNHP/DNR (see p. 79) and go to SC 2.2 NOX SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? YES = Category I NO ..x_not a Heritage Wetland SC 3.0 Bogs (seep. 87) Does the wetland unit (or any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify if the wedand is a bog. If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wedand based on its functions. 1. Does the unit have organic soil horizons (i.e. layers of organic soil), either peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils)? Yes - go to Q. 3 X No -go to Q. 2 2. Does the unit have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on a lake or pond? Yes -go to Q. 3 X No -Is not a bog for purpose of rating 3. Does the unit have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND other plants, if present, consist of the "bog" species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation (more than 30% of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)? Yes-Is a bog for purpose ofrating X No -go to Q. 4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16" deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the "bog" plant species in Table 3 are present, the wetland is a bog. J. Is the unit forested (> 30% cover) with sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Englemann's spruce, or western white pine, WITH any of the species (or combination of species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover (> 30% coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover}? 2. YES= Category I NoX Is not a bog for purpose of rating Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 19 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 Cat. I Cat. I D Wetland name or number __ SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands (seep. 90) Does the wetland unit have at least 1 acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? lfyou answer yes you will still need to rate the wedand based on its funcdons. -Old-growth forests: (west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/acre (20 trees/hectare) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of 32 inches (81 cm) or more. NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests. Two-hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and "OR" so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. -Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are 80-200 years old OR have average diameters (dbh) exceeding 21 inches (53cm); crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth. YES = Category I Cat. I NO X not a forested wetland with special characteristics SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (seep. 91) Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? -The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks -The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon {needs to be measured near the bottom} YES= Go to SC 5.1 NOX not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1 Does the wetland meets all of the following three conditions? -The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of invasive plant species (see list of invasive species on p. 74). -At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. -The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre (4350 square feet) YES= Category I NO= Category II Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 20 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 Cat. I Cat. II D Wetland name or number~- SC 6.0 Interdunal Wetlands (seep. 93) Is the wetland unit west of the 1889 line {also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? YES -go to SC 6.1 NO X not an interdunal wetland for rating If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. In practical tenns that means the following geographic areas: • Long Beach Peninsula-lands west of SR 103 • Grayland-Westport-iands west of SR 105 • Ocean Shores-Copalis-lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is once acre or larger? YES = Category II X NO -go to SC 6.2 Cat. II SC 6.2 Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and 1 acre? YES = Category III Cat. III Category of wetland based onSpecial Characteristics Choose the "highest" rating if wetland falls into several categories, and record on p;l. Ifvou. answered NO for all tvnes e11ter "Not Annlicable" on o.1 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 21 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 E Wetland name or number __ WETLAND RATING FORM-WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2 -Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users Updated Oct 2008 with the new WDFW definitions for priority habitats Name of wetland (if known): _w_e_tl_a_nd_E ___________ Date of site visit: 0510612009 Rated by Adam Gale and Joe Pursley Trained by Ecology? YesXNo_ Date of training May 2007 SEC: 29 TWNSHP: 24 N RNGE: ~ Is S/f/R in Appendix D? Yes_ NoX M f ti d ·t F" Est1·mated s1·ze 0·1 Acre ap o we an um : 1gure __ SUMMARY OF RATING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland I_ II_ IIIX IV_ Category I= Score >=70 Category II = Score 51-69 Category III = Score 30-50 Category IV = Score < 30 Score for Water Quality Functions 14 Score for Hydrologic Functions 24 I------< Score for Habitat Functions 12 ;--...,. TOT AL score for Functions 50 Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland I_ II_ Does not Apply X Final Category c,oo,R th, "hlghm" """"' £mm """w) D s ummarvo fb . "nf b h tl d as1c 1 ormation a out t e we an umt Wetland Unit has Special Wetland HGM Class Characteristics u:sed for Ratine: Estuarine Deoressional 'x Natural Heritage Wetland Riverine Bog Lake-fringe Mature Forest Slope Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal Lae:oon Freshwater Tidal Interdunal None of the above X Check if unit has multiple HGM classes oresent Wetland Rating Form-western Washlngton 1 version 2 To be used with Ecology Publication 04-06-025 August 2004 • E Wetland name or number __ Does the wetland unit being rated meet any of the criteria below? If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland . ' ... . ···-.. Check List for Wetlands That May Need Additional Protection YES (in addition to the nrotection recommended for its cc1tee:orv) SPl. Has the wedand unit been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered animal or plant species ([IE species}? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the annrooriate state or federal database. SP2. Has the wedand unit been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or Endangered animal species? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are catee:orized as Catee:orv I Natural Heritae:e Wetlands (see o. 19 of data form). SP3. Does the wedand unit contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WDFW for the state? SP4. Does the wetland unit have a local significance in addition to its functions? For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having special significance. To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the Hydrogeomorphic Class of the wetland being rated. .. ··.No X X X X The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. See p. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 2 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 E Wetland name or number __ Classification of Wetland Units in Western Washington If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unitwith multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which . hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question 8. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during floods)? NO -go to 2 YES -the wetland class is Tidal Fringe If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? YES -Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO -Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. !fit is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wetland. Wetlands that were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the term "Estuarine" wetland is kept. Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Category I and II estuarine wetlands have changed (see p. ) . 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. NO -go to 3 YES -The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a "Flats" wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet both of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any vegetation on the surface) at least 20 acres (8 ha) in size; _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m)? NO-go to 4 YES -The wetland class is Lake-fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? XThe wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), XThe water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks. __ The water leaves the wetland without being impounded? NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks {depressions are usually < 3ft diameter and Jess than 1 foot deep). NO -go to 5 YES -The wetland class is Slope Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 3 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 E Wetland name or number __ 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? __ The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river __ The overbank flooding occurs at least once every two years. NOTE: The riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding. NO -go to 6 YES -The wetland class is Riverine 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at some time during the year. This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO -go to 7 YES -The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding. The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO-go to 8 YES -The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM clases. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM Classes within the wetland unit beinl! rated · HGM Class to Use in Rating Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Slone+ Lake-frlne:e Lake-frlne:e Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional Depressional + Lake-frine:e Depressional Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under wetland wetlands with special characteristics If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or if you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 4 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 E Wetland name or number __ _ I) Depressional and Flats Wetlands I WATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS -Indicators that the wetland unit functions to I .... · .. improve water aualitv ·.· . D D 1. Does the wetland unit have the gotential to improve water quality? D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: D Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points= 3 Unit has an intermittently flowing. OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points= 2 Unit has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted. surface outlet (permanendy flowing) points= I Unit is a "flat" depression (Q. 7 on key). or in the Flats class, with permanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch points= 1 (If ditch Is not permanently flowing treat unit as "intermittently jlowing'1 Provide photo or drawina S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface (or duff layer} ls clay or organic (use NRCS D definitions) YES points= 4 NO points= 0 D 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation (emergent, shrub, and/or forest Cowardin class) D Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation > = 95% of area points= 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation > = 1/2 of area points= 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation>= 1/10 of area points= I Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation <1/10 of area points= 0 Map of Cowardin veoetation classes D 1.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation. D This is the area of the wetland unit that is ponded far at least 2 months, but dries out sometime during the year. Do not count the area that is permanently ponded. Estimate area as the average condition 5 out of JO yrs. Area seasonally ponded is > I', total area of wetland points= 4 Area seasonally ponded is > \4 total area of wetland points= 2 Area seasonally ponded is < \4 total area of wetland points= 0 Mao of Hvdrooeriods D Total for DI Add the points in the boxes above D D 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to improve water quality? Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water corning into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland. Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants coming from several sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity. -Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft X Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland -Tilled fields or orchards within 150 ft of wetland -A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas, residential areas, farmed fields, roads, or clear-cut logging -Residential, urban areas, golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland -Wetland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen -Other YES multiolier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 D TOTAL -Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from DI by D2 Add score to table on o. 1 Wetland Rating Form --western Washington 5 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 Points (only I score per box) (seep.38} Figure_ 2 D Figure_ 3 Figure_ 2 -----I 7 I -----(seep. 44) multiplier 2 -- 14 E Wetland name or number __ D Depressional and Flats Wetlands HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS -Indicators that the wetland unit functions to reduce floodine and stream deeradation D 3. Does the wetland unit have the IJOtential to reduce flooding and erosion? D D 3.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland unit Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving ii (no outlet) points= 4 Unit has an Intermittently flowing, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points= 2 Unit is a "flat" depression (Q. 7 on key), or in the Flats class, with permanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch points= 1 (If ditch is not permanently flowing treat unit as "intermittently flowing") Unit has an unconstricted, or sliehtlv constricted, surface outlet -/ =rmanendv flowinn\ noints -0 D D 3. 2 Depth of storage during wet periods Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For units with no outlet measure from the surface of permanent water or deepest part (if dry}. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points= 7 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland" points= 5 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points= 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points= 3 Unit is flat (yes to Q. 2 or Q. 7 on key) but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points= 1 Marks of nnndine less than 0.5 ft nnints = 0 D D 3.3 Contribution of wetland unit to storage in the watershed Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wedand unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of unit points= 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points= 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points= 0 Entire unit is in the FLATS class ooints = 5 D Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above D D 4. Does the wetland unit have the OlJIJOrtunity to reduce flooding and erosion? Answer YES if the unit is In a location in the watershed where the flood storage, or reduction In water velocity, it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Answer NO if the water corning into the wetland is controlled by a structure such as flood gate, tide gate, flap valve, reservoir etc. OR you estimate that more than 90% of the water in the wetland is from groundwater in areas where damaging groundwater flooding does not occur. Note which of the following indicators of opportunity apply. -Wetland is In a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems -Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems -Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might otherwise flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems X Other Overflows to Lake Washington YES multiolier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 D TOTAL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4 Add score to table on p. 1 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 6 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 Points {only 1 score per box) (seep.46) 2 7 3 -----I 12 I -----(seep. 49} multiplier 2 24 E Wetland name or number __ ·. ··These questions appljr to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT.FUNCTIONS -Indicators that unit functions to provide important habitat H 1. Does the wetland unit have the potential to provide habitat for many species? H 1.1 Vegetation structure (seep. 72) Check the types of vegetation classes present (as defined by Cowardin)-Size threshold for each class is M acre or more than 10% of the area if unit is smaller than 2.5 acres. __ Aquatic bed __ Emergent plants __x_scrub/shrub (areas where shrubs have >30% cover) __x_Forested (areas where trees have >30% cover) If the unit has a forested class check if: __ The forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the forested polygon Add the number of vegetation structures that qualify. If you have: Map of Cowardin vegetation classes H 1.2. Hydroperiods (seep. 73) 4 structures or more 3 structures 2 structures 1 structure points= 4 points= 2 points= 1 ooints = 0 Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wedand. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wed and or M acre to count. (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods) _x_Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present _x_seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present points= 3 points= 2 point= 1 points= 0 __ Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present _x_saturated only 1 type present __ Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland __ Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland __ Lake-fringe wetland = 2 points __ Freshwater tidal wetland= 2 points Map of hydroperiods H 1.3. Richness of Plant Species (seep. 75) Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least IO ft 2• (dllferent patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold) You do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, If you counted: > 19 species List species below if you want to: 5 -19 species < 5 species Canadian Thisde points= 2 points= I points= 0 Points (only I score per box) Figure_ 1 Figure_ 2 1 4 Total for page __ _ Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 13 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 E Wetland name or number __ H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats (seep. 76) igure _ Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, medium, low, or none. C) 0 None = 0 points Low= 1 point Moderate = 2 points ... "1: ~· High = 3 points b [riparian braided channels] NOTE: If you have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water the ratio is alwa s "lri ". Use ma of Cowardin ve etation classes H 1.5. Special Habitat Features: (seep. 77) Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points you put into the next column. __ Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (>4in. diameter and 6 ft long). __ Standing snags (diameter at the bottom > 4 inches) in the wetland __ Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft (Im) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the unit, for at least 33 ft (10m) __ Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet turned grey/brown} __ At least 1/., acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated. (structures for egg-laying by amphibians) X Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in each stratum of plants 2 1 NOTE: The 20 % stated in early printings of the manual on page 78 is an error. ~--------------=-....:_-~ ______ _:_....:_ _________ ~---- 7 H 1. TOT AL Score -potential for providing habitat Add the scores from HJ.I, Hl.2, Hl.3, Hl.4, Hl.5 ~--------------======-==-==-===========.::_~----~ Comments Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 14 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 E Wetland name or number __ H 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species? H 2.1 Buffers (seep. 80} Figure_ Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland unit. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See text for definition of "undisturbed. " -100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no-grazing, no landscaping, no daily human use) Points = 5 -100 m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 50% circumference. Points = 4 -50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% circumference. Points = 4 -100 m (330ft} of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water> 25% circumference, . Points = 3 -50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for > 50% circumference. Points = 3 If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above -No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft) of wetland> 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 -No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >50% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 X Heavy grazing in buffer. Points = I -Vegetated buffers are <2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference (e.g. tilled fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points = 0. -Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points = I o Aerial ohoto showinq buffers H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (seep. 81) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads, paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor). YES= 4 points (go to H 2.J'J NO = go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland} that is at least 50ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake-fringe wetland, if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? YES= 2 points (go 10 H 2.J'J NO = H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 Is the wetland: within 5 mi (8km) of a brackish or salt water estuary OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasture (>40 acres) OR within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? 1 YES= 1 ooint NO= 0 ooints 1 Total for page. __ _ Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 15 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August2004 E Wetland name or number __ H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW (see new and complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in the PHS report http://wdfw. wa.govlhablphslist.htm) Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft (lOOm) of the wetland unit? NOTE: the connections do not have to be relatively undisturbed. __ Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.4 ha (1 acre). _2S_Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 152). __ Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. __ Old-growth/Mature forests: (Old-growth west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi-layered ciU)opy with occasional small openings; with at least 20 trees/ha (8 trees/acre) > 81 cm (32 in) dbh or> 200 years of age. (Mature forests) Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm (21 in) dbh; crown cover may be less that 100%; crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth; 80 -200 years old west of the Cascade crest. __ Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158}. __ Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. __ Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non-forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161). __ Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instrearn fish and wildlife resources. __ Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report: pp. 167-169 and glossary in Appendix A). __ Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. __ Cliffs: Greater than 7 .6 m (25 ft) high and occurring below 5000 ft. __ Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 -2.0 m (0.5 -6.5 ft), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. __ Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of> 51 cm (20 in) in western Washington and are> 2 m (6.5 ft) in height. Priority logs are> 30 cm (12 inl in diameter at the largest end, and> 6 m (20 ft) long. If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats = 4 points If wetland has 2 priority habitats = 3 points If wetland has 1 priority habitat = 1 point No habitats = 0 points Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list. Nearby wetlands are addressed in queslion H 2. 4) Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 16 August2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 E Wetland name or number __ H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the one description of the landscape around the weliand that best fits) (seep. 84) There are at least 3 other wetlands within 'h mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed {light grazing between wetlands OK. as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields, or other development. points= 5 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and thcr.e are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within 'h mile points= 5 There are at least 3 other wetlands within 'h mile, BUT the connections between them are disturbed points= 3 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetland within 'h mile points= 3 There is at least 1 wetland within 'h mile. points= 2 There are no wetlands within 'h mile. points= 0 H 2. TOT AL Score -opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores from H2.1,H2.2, H2.3, H2.4 TOTAL for H I from page 14 Total Score for Habitat Functions -add the points for H I, H 2 and record the result on p. 1 Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 17 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 3 -----I 5 I I I ----- 7 ----- 12 E Wetland name or number __ CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please determine if the wedand meets the attributes described below and circle the appropriate answers and Category. Wetland Type Category Check off any criteria ihat apply to the wedand. Cirde the Category when the annrooriate criteria are met. SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands (seep. 86) Does the wetland unit meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? -The dominant water regime is tidal, -Vegetated, and -With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. YES= Go to SC 1.1 NOX SC 1.1 Is the wetland unit within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, Cat. I National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? YES = Cate!!orv I X NO go to SC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland unit at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? YES = Category I NO = Category II Cat. I -The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, Cat. II cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10% cover of non-native plant species. If the non-native Spartina spp. are the only species that cover more than 10% of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual Dual rating (I/II). The area of Spartina would be rated a Category II while the rating relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a I/II Category I. Do not, however, exclude the area of Spartina in determining the size threshold of 1 acre. -At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. -The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 18 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 E Wetland name or number __ SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands (seep. 87) Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland unit being rated in a Section!fownship/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? (this question is used to screen out most sites before you need to contact WNHPIDNR) Sff/R information from Appendix D _ or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site _ YES __ -contact WNHP/DNR (see p. 79) and go to SC 2.2 NOX SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? YES= Category I NO __x__not a Heritage Wetland SC 3.0 Bogs (seep. 87} Does the wetland unit (or any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify if the wedand is a bog. If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. 1. Does the unit have organic soil horizons (i.e. layers of organic soil), either peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils)? Yes - F~~3 X~-F~Q.2 2. Does the unit have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on a lake or pond? Yes -go to Q. 3 X No -Is not a bog for purpose ofrating 3. Does the unit have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND other plants, if present, consist of the "bog" species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation (more than 30% of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)? Yes -Is a bog for purpose of rating X No -go to Q. 4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16" deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the "bog" plant species in Table 3 are present, the wetland is a bog. I. Is the unit forested (> 30% cover) with sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Englemann' s spruce, or western white pine, WITH any of the species (or combination of species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover(> 30% coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover)? 2. YES = Category I No X Is not a bog for purpose of rating Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 19 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 Cat. I Cat. I E Wetland name or number __ SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands (seep. 90) Does the wetland unit have at least 1 acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? lfyou answer yes you will still need to rate the wedand based on its functions. -Old-growth forests: (west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/acre (20 trees/hectare) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a · diameter at breast height (dbh) of32 inches (81 cm) or more. NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests. Two-hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and ''OR" so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. -Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are 80 -200 years old OR have average diameters (dbh) exceeding 21 inches (53cm); crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity oflarge downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth. Cat. I NO X not a forested wetland with special characteristics YES = Category I SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (seep. 91} Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? -The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks -The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured near the bottom} YES= Go to SC 5.1 NOX not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1 Does the wetland meets all of the following three conditions? -The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of invasive plant species (see list of invasive species on p. 7 4). -At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. -The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre ( 4350 square feet) YES = Category I NO = Category II Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 20 August2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 Cat. I Cat. II E Wetland name or number __ SC 6.0 Interdunal Wetlands (seep. 93) Is the wetland unit west of the 1889 Iine (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? YES -go to SC 6.1 NO X not an interdunal wetland for rating If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: • Long Beach Peninsula-lands west of SR I 03 • Grayland-Westport-lands west of SR 105 • Ocean Shores-Copalis-lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is once acre or larger? YES = Category II X NO -go to SC 6.2 Cat. II SC 6.2 Is the unit between 0.1 and I acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and I acre? YES = Category III Cat. III Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics Choose the "highest"rating if wetland falls into several categories, and record.on p. L ff you answered NO for all tvm;:s enter "Not Annlicable" on n.l Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 21 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 F Wetland name or number __ WETLAND RATING FORM-WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2 -Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users Updated Oct 2008 with the new WDFW definitions for priority habitats Name of wetland (if known): _w_e_t_la_nd_F __________ Date of site visit: o5toet 2oo 9 Rated by Adam Gale and Joe Pursley Trained by Ecology? YesXNo_ Date of training May 2007 SEC:_::__ TWNSHP: 24 N RNGE: ~ Is S/T/R in Appendix D? Yes_ NoX Map of wetland unit: Figure __ Estimated size 0· 1 Acre SUMMARY OF RATING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland I_ II_ HIX IV_ Category I= Score >=70 Category II = Score 51-69 Category III = Score 30-50 Category N = Score < 30 Score for Water Quality Functions 12 Score for Hydrologic Functions s 1-----1 Score for Habitat Functions 15 .---.. TOT AL score for Functions 35 Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland I_ II_ Does not Apply X Final Category (d>-th• "blgh"'" ral<gory from abon) 8 s ummarvo fb b h tl d asic in ormation a out t ewe an umt Wetland Unithas Special Wetland HGM Class Characteristics used for Rating Estuarine Depressional Natural Herita11e Wetland Riverine Bog Lake-frin11e X Mature Forest Slope Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal Lagoon Freshwater Tidal Interdunal None of the above X Check if unit has multiple X HGM classes present Wetland Rating Form-western Washington I version 2 To he used with Ecology Publication 04-06-025 August 2004 F Wetland name or number __ _ Does the wetland unit being rated meet any of the criteria below? If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland . . Check List for Wetlands That May Need Additional Protection YES (in addition to the nrotection recornmendedfor its cate~orv) SPl. Has the wetland unit been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered animal or plant species ([IE species)? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the annronriate state or federal database. SP2. Has the wetland unit been docwnented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or Endangered animal species? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are cateaorized as Cate1mrv I Natural Heritae:e Wetlands (see o. 19 of data form). SP3. Does the wetland unit contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WDFW for the stale? SP4. Does the wetland unit have a local significance in addition to its functions? For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having special significance. To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the Hydrogeomorphic Class of the wedand being rated. NO X X X X The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. See p. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 2 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 F Wetland name or number __ Classification of Wetland Units in Western Washington If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire urut being rated, youprobablyhavea unit with multiple HGMdasses. In this case, identifywhich hydrologic criteria in questions l-7 apply, and go to Question 8. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during floods)? NO -go to 2 YES -the wetland class is Tidal Fringe If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? YES -Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO -Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) If your wedand can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wedands. !fit is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wedand. Wetlands that were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the term "Estuarine" wetland is kept. Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Category I and II estuarine wetlands have changed (see p. ). 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. NO-go to 3 YES -The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a "Flats" wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet both of the following criteria? X The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any vegetation on the surface) at least 20 acres (8 ha) in size; X At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m)? NO -go to 4 YES -The wetland class is Lake-fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? XThe wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), XThe water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks. AThe water leaves the wetland without being impounded? NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type ofwedands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3ft diameter and Jess than 1 foot deep). NO -go to 5 YES-The wetland class is Slope Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 3 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August2004 F Wetland name or number __ 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? __ The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river __ The overbank flooding occurs at least once every two years. NOTE: The riverine unit can contain depressions that are f"uled with water when the river is not flooding. NO -go to 6 YES -The wetland class is Riverine 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at some time during the year. This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO -go to 7 YES -The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding. The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO -go to 8 YES -The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM clases. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGMClasses within the wetland unitbein2 rated HGM ClasstoUseinRatine Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Deoressional Depressional Slope + Lake-frinee Lake-fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional Deoressional + Lake-frine:e Depresslonal Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under wetland wetlands with special characteristics If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or if you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 4 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 F Wetland name or number __ L Lake-fringe Wetlands WATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS -Indicators that the wetland unit functions to improve water auaiitv .. L L 1. Does the wetland unit have the 11otential to improve water quality? L L 1.1 Average width of vegetation along the lakeshore (use polygons ofCowardin classes): Vegetation is more than 33ft (!Om} wide points= 6 Vegetation is more than 16 (5m} wide and <33ft points= 3 Vegetation is more than 6ft (2m) wide and <16 ft points= I Vegetation is less than 6 ft wide points= 0 Mao of Cowardin classes with widths marked L L 1.2 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland: choose the appropriate description that results in the highest points, and do not include any open water in your estimate of coverage. The herbaceous plants can be either the dominant form or as an understory in a shrub or forest community. These are not Cowardin classes. Area of Cover is total cover in the unit, but it can be in patches. NOTE: Herbaceous does not include aquatic bed. Cover of herbaceous plants is >90% of the vegetated area points= 6 Cover of herbaceous plants is >2/3 of the vegetated area points= 4 Cover of herbaceous plants is > 1/3 of the vegetated area points= 3 Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed or herbaceous covers > 2/3 unit points= 3 Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed in > 1/3 vegetated area points= I Aquatic bed vegetation and open water cover > 2/3 of the unit points= 0 Map with polvoons of different veaetation tvoes L Add the points in the boxes above L L 2. Does the wetland have the 01111ortunity to improve water quality? Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in the lake water, or polluted I surface water flowing through the unit to the lake. Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants coming from several sou~es, but any single source would qualify as opportunity. -Wetland is along the shores of a lake or reservoir that doe.s not meet water quality standards -Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft -Polluted water discharges to wetland along upland edge -Tilled fields or orchards within 150 feet of wetland -Residential or urban areas are within 150 ft of wetland -Parks with grassy areas that are maintained, ballfields, golf courses (all within X 150 ft. of lake shore) Power boats with gasoline or diesel engines use the lake -Other YES multiolier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 L TOTAL -Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from LI by L2 Add score to table on p, 1 Comments Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 9 version 2 Updated with new WDFW de6nitlons Oct. 2008 August 2004 Points (only 1 score per box) (seep.59) Figure_ 1 Figure_ 3 -----4 I -----(see p.61) multiplier 2 -- 8 F Wetland name or number __ L Lake-fringe Wetlands HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS O Indicators that the wetlan<l,tlrut functions to reduce shoreline erosion · . . ' > .. '.·'_-,' L L 3. Does the wetland unit have the potential to reduce shoreline erosion? L L 3 Distance along shore and average width of Cowardin classes along the lakeshore (do not include aquatic bed): (choose the highest scoring description that matches conditions in the wedand) > % of distance is shrubs or forest at least 33 ft (10m) wide points= 6 > % of distance is shrubs or forest at least 6 ft. (2 m) wide points= 4 > Y.. distance is shrubs or forest at least 33 ft (!Om) wide points= 4 Vegetation is at least 6 ft (Zm) wide {any type except aquatic bed) points= 2 Vegetation is less than 6 ft (2ml wide (any type except aquatic bed) points= 0 Aerial ohoto or mao with Cowardin venetation classes L Record the points from the box above L L 4. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to reduce erosion? Are there features along the shore that will be impacted if the shoreline erodes? Note which of the following conditions apply. X There are human structures and activities along the upland edge of the wetland (buildings, fields) that can be damaged by erosion. -There are undisturbed natural resources along the upland edge of the wetland (e.g. mature forests other wetlands) than can be damaged by shoreline erosion -Other YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 L TOT AL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from L 3 by L 4 Add score to table on p. 1 Comments Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 10 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 Points (oilly l sct,re petbox) --·-· ' (seep.62) Figure_ 4 -----I 4 I -----(seep.63) multiplier 2 8 F Wetland name or number __ , These questions apply to wedands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS -Indicators that unit functions to provide important habitat H 1. Does the wetland unit have the potential to provide habitat for many species? H 1.1 Vegetation structure (seep. 72) Check the types of vegetation classes present {as defined by Cowardin)-Size threshold for each class is M acre or more than 10% of the area if unit is smaller than 2.5 acres. __ Aquatic bed _x__Emergent plants _x__scrub/shrub (areas where shrubs have >30% cover) __ Forested (areas where trees have >30% cover) If the unit has a forested class check if: __ The forested class has 3 ont of 5 strata (canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the forested polygon Add the number of vegetation structures that qualifjr. If you have: Map of Cowardin vegetation classes H 1.2. Hydroperiods (seep. 73) 4 structures or more 3 structures 2 structures 1 structure points= 4 points= 2 points= 1 nnints = 0 Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or M acre to count. (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods) __ Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present __ Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present points= 3 points= 2 point= 1 points= 0 __ Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present __ Saturated only 1 type present __ Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland __ Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland __x_ Lake-fringe wetland = 2 points __ Freshwater tidal wetland= 2 points Map of hydroperiods H 1.3. Richness of Plant Species (seep. 75) Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft 2• of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold) You do not have to name the species. Do not Include Eurasian Milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple /oosestrife, If you counted: > 19 species List species below if you want to: 5 -19 species < 5 species (different patches Canadian Thistle points= 2 points= 1 points~ 0 Points {only I score per box) Figure_ 1 Figure_ 2 1 4 Total for page __ _ Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 13 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 F Wetland name or number __ H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats (seep. 76} igure _ Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation classes (described in HI.I), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, medium, low, or none. C) 0 None = 0 points Low= 1 point ~.~ ~ High = 3 points Moderate = 2 points .. [ riparian braided channels) NOTE: If you have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water the ratin is alwa s "hi h". Use map of Cowardin ve elation classes H 1.5. Special Habitat Features: (seep. 77) Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points you put into the next column. __ Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (>4in. diameter and 6 ft long). __ Standing snags (diameter at the bottom > 4 inches) in the wetland -.X_Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft (Im) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the unit, for at least 33 ft (!Om) __ Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet turned grey/brown) __ At least \i, acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated. (structures for egg-laying by amphibians) __ Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in each stratum of plants 1 1 NOTE: The 20 % stated in early printings of the manual on page 78 is an error. ~------------_;__;__--=-------=-----=----------~----H 1. TOT AL Score -potential for providing habitat I 6 I c_ ___________ _:A~d=d~&=-e~~=o~re=s~fro=-=m~H=l.~1,~H~l~.~~~H~l~.3~,~H=l~.4~,~H=l~.5'--'-1----J Comments Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 14 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 F Wetland name or number __ H 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species? H 2.1 Buffers (seep. 80) Figure_ Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland unit. The highest scoring criterion that appJJes to the wetland Is to be used in the rating. See text for definition of "undisturbed. " -100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no-grazing, no landscaping, no daily human use) Points = 5 -100 m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 50% circumference. Points = 4 -50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% circumference. Points = 4 -100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water> 25% circumference, . Points = 3 -50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for > 50% circumference. Points = 3 If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above -No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft) of wetland> 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 -No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >50% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 -Heavy grazing in buffer. Points= 1 -Vegetated buffers are <2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference {e.g. tilled fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points = 0. X Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points = 1 1 Aerial photo showina buffers H 2 .2 Corridors and Connections (seep. 81) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads, paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor). YES= 4 points (go to H 2.3) NO =goto H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 50ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake-fringe wetland, if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? YES = 2 points (go to H 2.3) NO = H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 Is the wetland: within 5 mi (8km) of a brackish or salt water estuary OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasture (>40 acres) OR within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? 2 YES = 1 point NO = 0 ooints 3 Total for page" __ _ Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 15 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 F Wetland name or number __ H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW (see new and complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in the PHS report hllp:/lwdfw. wa.govlhablphslist.htm) Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft (100m) of the wetland unit? NOTE: the connections do not have to he relatively undisturbed. __ Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.4 ha (1 acre). LBiodlversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 152). __ Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. __ Old-growth/Mature forests: (Old-growth west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 20 trees/ha {8 trees/acre) > 81 cm {32 in) dbh or > 200 years of age. !Mature forests) Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm (21 in) dbh; crown cover may be less that 100%; crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material ls generally less than that found in old-growth; 80 -200 years old west of the Cascade crest. __ Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158). __ Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contalns elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. __ Westside Prairies: Herbaceous. non-forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (Juli descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161). __ Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. __ Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (lull descriptions of habitats and the definition ofrelatively undisturbed are in WDFW report: pp. 167-169 and glossary in Appendix A). __ Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contaln a human. __ Cliffs: Greater than 7.6 m (25 ft) high and occurring below 5000 ft. __ Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 -2.0 m {0.5 -6.5 ft), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. __ Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of> 51 cm (20 in) in western Washington and are> 2 m (6.5 ft) in height. Priority logs are> 30 cm (12 in) in diameter at the largest end, and> 6 m (20 ft) long. If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats = 4 points If wetland has 2 priority habitats = 3 points If wetland has 1 priority habitat = 1 point No habitats = 0 points Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habirat but are not induded in this list. Nearbv wetlands are addressed in ouestion H 2.4) Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 16 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 1 F Wetland name or number __ H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland that best fits) (seep. 84) There are at least 3 other wetlands within I', mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads. fill, fields, or other development. points= 5 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within 1h mile points~ 5 There are at least 3 other wetlands within Vi mile, BUT the connections between them are disturbed points= 3 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetland within 'Ii mile points= 3 There is at least 1 wetland within I', mile. points= 2 There are no wetlands within Vi mile. points= 0 H 2. TOTAL Score -opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores from H2.l,H2.2, H2.3, H2.4 TOT AL for H 1 from page 14 Total Score for Habitat Functions -add the points for H 1, H 2 and record the result on p. 1 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 17 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 5 -----I 9 I I I ----- 6 ----- 15 F Wetland name or number __ CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described below_ and circle the appropriate answers and Category. Wetland Type Category Check off any criteria that apply to the wetland. Circle the Category when the annrooriate criteria are met. SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands (seep. 86} Does the wetland unit meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? -The dominant water regime is tidal, -Vegetated, and -With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. YES= Go to SC 1.1 NO..X. SC 1.1 Is the wetland unit within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, Cat. I National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? YES -Cate!!Orv I X NO 110 to SC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland unit at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? YES = Category I NO = Category II Cat. I -The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no dildng, ditching, filling, Cat. II cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10% cover of non-native plant species. If the non-native Spartina spp. are the only species that cover more than 10% of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual Dual rating (I/II). The area of Spartina would be rated a Category II while the rating relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a I/II Category I. Do not, however, exclude the area of Spartina in determining the size threshold of l acre. -At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. -The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 18 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 . F Wetland name or number __ SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands (seep. 87} Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland unit being rated in a Section/Township/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? (this question is used to screen out most sites before you need to contact WNHPIDNR) S!TIR information from Appendix D _ or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site _ YES __ -contact WNHP/DNR (seep. 79) and go to SC 2.2 NOX SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? YES = Category I NO __x_not a Heritage Wetland SC 3.0 Bogs (seep. 87) Does the wetland unit (or any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify if the wetland is a bog. If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. 1. Does the unit have organic soil horizons (i.e. layers of organic soil), either peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils)? Yes - F~Q.3 X~-F~Q.2 2. Does the unit have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on a lake or pond? Yes -go to Q. 3 X No -Is not a bog for purpose of rating 3. Does the unit have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND other plants, if present, consist of the "bog" species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation (more than 30% of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)? Yes-Is a bog for purpose of rating X No -go to Q. 4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16" deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the "bog" plant species in Table 3 are present, the wetland is a bog. J. Is the unit forested (> 30% cover) with sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Englemann's spruce, or western white pine, WITH any of the species (or combination of species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover (> 30% coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover)? 2. YES = Category I NoX Is not a bog for purpose of rating Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 19 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct 2008 August 2004 Cat. I Cat. I F Wetland name or number __ SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands (seep. 90) Does the wetland unit have at least 1 acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. -Old-growth forests: {west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/acre {20 trees/hectare) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height {dbh) of 32 inches (81 cm) or more. NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests. Two-hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and "OR" so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. -Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are 80 -200 years old OR have average diameters (dbh) exceeding 21 inches (53cm); crown cover maybe less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth. YES = Category I NO X not a forested wetland with special characteristics SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (seep. 91) Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? -The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks -The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured near the bottom) YES = Go to SC 5.1 NO X not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1 Does the wetland meets all of the following three conditions? -The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of invasive plant species (see list of invasive species on p. 7 4). -At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. -The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre (4350 square feet) YES = Category I NO = Category II Wetland Rating Form -western WasWngton 20 August2004 version 2 Updated wilh new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 Cat. I Cat. I Cat. II F Wetland name or number __ SC 6.0 Interdunal Wetlands (seep. 93) Is the wetland unit west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? YES -go to SC 6.1 NO X not an interdunal wetland for rating If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wedand based on its functions. In practical tenns that means the following geographic areas: • Long Beach Peninsula-lands west of SR 103 • Grayland-Westport-landswest of SR 105 • Ocean Shores-Copalis-lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is once acre or larger? YES = Category II X NO -go to SC 6.2 Cat. II SC 6.2 Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between O .1 and 1 acre? YES = Category III Cat. III Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics Choose the "highest" rating if wetland falls into several categories, and recordon p. J. If you answered NO for all types enter "Not Aoo]icable" on p.l Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 21 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 G Wetland name or number __ WETLAND RATING FORM-WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2 -Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users Updated Oct 2008 with the new WDFW definitions for priority habitats Name of wetland (if known): _w_e_ll_a_nd_G ___________ Date of site visit: 0413012009 Rated by Adam Gale and Joe Pursley Trained by Ecology? YesXNo_ Date of training May 2007 SEC: 29 TWNSHP: 24 N RNGE: ~ Is S/f/R in Appendix D? Yes_ No.X Map of wetland unit: Figure__ Estimated size 0-1 Acre SUMMARY OF RA TING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland I_ II_ IIIX IV_ Category I= Score >=70 Category II = Score 51-69 Category III= Score 30-50 Category N = Score < 30 Score for Water Quality Functions 18 Score for Hydrologic Functions 16 1-----1 Score for Habitat Functions 11 a---.... TOT AL score for Functions 45 Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland I_ II_ Does not Apply X Final Category (,hoo~ t1re "'"""'" '"""' rrom •bow) [] s fb . 'nf ummarvo as1c 1 ormationa b h tl d out t ewe an urnt Wetland Unithas Special Wetland HGM Class Characteristics used for Ratin!! Estuarine Depressional 'x Natural Herita11e Wetland Riverine Bog Lake-frin!!e Mature Forest Slope Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal La11oon Freshwater Tidal Interdunal None of the above X Check if unit has multiple HGM classes oresent Wetland Rating Form -western Washington version 2 To be used with Ecology Publication 04-06-025 August 2004 G Wetland name or number __ Does the wetland unit being rated meet any of the criteria below? If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland. Check List for Wetlands ThatMay Need Additional Protection ·•··YEs (in addition to the orotection recommended for its cate1mrv) · . SP1. Has the wetland unit been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered animal or plant species (TIE species)? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the aoorooriate state or federal database. SP2. Has the wetland unit been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or Endangered animal species? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are catee:orized as Catee:orv I Natural Heritae:e Wetlands (see o. 19 of data form). SP3. Does the wetland unit contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WDFW for the state? SP4. Does the wetland unit have a local significance in addition to its functions? For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having special significance. To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the Hydrogeomorphic Class of the wetland being rated. NO· .. ·.·· X X X X The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphlc Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. See p. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 2 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August2004 G Wetland name or number __ Classification of Wetland Units in Western Washington If the hydroiogic criteda listed in each question do not apply to the :entire unit being ··. rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrofogic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question 8. 1. Axe the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during floods)? NO -go to 2 YES -the wetland class is Tidal Fringe If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? YES -Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO -Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the fonns for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wetland. Wetlands that were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the term "Estuarine" wetland is kept. Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Category I and II estuarine wetlands have changed (see p. ) . 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. NO -go to 3 YES -The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a "Flats" wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet both of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any vegetation on the surface) at least 20 acres (8 ha) in size; _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m)? NO -go to 4 YES-The wetland class is Lake-fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? XThe wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), _X_ The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks. __ The water leaves the wetland without being impounded? NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually < 3ft diameter and Jess than 1 foot deep). NO -go to 5 YES -The wetland class is Slope Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 3 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 G Wetland name or number __ 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? __ The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river __ The overbank flooding occurs at least once every two years. NOTE: The riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding. NO -go to 6 YES -The wetland class is Riverine 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at some time during the year. This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO -go to 7 YES -The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding. The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO -go to 8 YES -The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM clases. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDRO LOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM Classes within the wetland unit beini! rated HGMCla$5 to Use JnRatlni!! Slone + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Slope+ Lake-fringe Lake-fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional Depressional + Lake-fringe Depressional Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under wetland wetlands with special characteristics If you are unable still to detennine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or if you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 4 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August2004 G Wetland name or number __ D Depressional and Flats Wetlands WATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS -Indicators that the wetland unit functions to improve water Qualitv D D I. Does the wetland unit have the !lOtential to improve water quality? D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: D Unit ls a depression with no surface water leaving It (no outlet) points= 3 Unit has an intermittently flowing, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points= 2 Unit has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted. surface outlet (permanently flowing) points = 1 Unit is a "flat" depression (Q. 7 on key). or in the Flats class, with permanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch points= 1 (If ditch is not permanently flowing treat unit as "intermittently flowing") Provide nhoto or drawinq S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface (or duff layer) is clay or organic (Ille NRCS D dellnillons} YES points= 4 NO ooints = 0 D 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation (emergent, shrub, and/or forest Cowardin class) D Wetland has persistent, uograzed, vegetation > = 95% of area points= 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation > = 1/2 of area points= 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation > = 1/10 of area points= 1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation <1110 of area points= 0 Map of Cowardin veaetation classes D 1.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation. D This is the area of the wedand unit that is ponded for at least 2 months, but dries out somellme during the year. Do not count the area that is pennanenlly ponded. Estimate area as the average condition 5 out of 10 yrs. Area seasonally ponded is > Y2 total area of wetland points= 4 Area seasonally ponded is> 14 total area of wetland paints= 2 Area seasonally ponded is< 14 total area of wetland paints= 0 Mao of Hvdrooeriods D Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above D D 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to improve water quality? Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater ar surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland. Note which of the following condillons provide the sources of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants coming from several sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity. -Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft ~ Untreated stormwatcr discharges to wetland -Tilled fields or orchards within 150 ft of wetland -A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas, residential areas, farmed fields, roads, or clear-cut logging -Residential, urban areas, golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland -Wetland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen -Other YES multiolier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 D TOTAL -Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from Dl by D2 Add score to table on /J. 1 Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 5 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 Points (only I score per box) . {seep.38) Figure_ 2 0 Figure_ 1 Figure_ 4 -----I 7 I -----(seep. 44} multiplier 2 -- 14 G Wetland name or number __ D Depressional and Flats Wetlands HYDRO LOGIC FUNCTIONS -Indicators that the wetland unit functions to reduce flooding and stream del!l'adation D 3. Does the wetland unit have the notential to reduce flooding and erosion? D D 3.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland unit Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points= 4 Unit has an intermittently flowing, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points= 2 Unit is a "flat'' depression (Q. 7 on key), or in the Flats class, with permanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch points= 1 (If ditch is not permanently flowing treat unit as "intermillently flowing') Unit has an unconstricted, or sll~htlv constricted, surface outlet ·r nermanentlv flowing) oolnts -0 D D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For units with no outlet measure from the surface of permanent water or deepest part (if dry}. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points= 7 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland" points= 5 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points= 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points= 3 Unit is flat (yes to Q. 2 or Q. 7 on key) but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points =-1 Marks of oonding less than 0.5 ft points= 0 D D 3.3 Contribution of wetland unit to storage in the watershed Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of unit points~ 5 The area of the basin is l O to 100 times the area of the unit points= 3 The area of the basin is more than I 00 times the area of the unit points~ 0 Entire unit is in the FLATS class noints = 5 D TotalforD 3 Add the points in the boxes above D D 4. Does the wetland unit have the onnortunity to reduce flooding and erosion? Answer YES if the unit is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage, or reduction in water velocity, it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Answer NO if the water coming into the wetland is controlled by a structure such as flood gate, tide gate, flap valve, reservoir etc. OR you estimate that more than 90% of the water in the wetland is from groundwater in areas where damaging groundwater flooding does not occur. Note which of the following indicators of opportunity apply. -Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems -Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems -Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might otherwise flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems X Other Overflows to Wetland D and then Lake Washington YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 D TOTAL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4 Add score to table on p. 1 Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 6 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 Points (only 1 score per box) (seep.46) 2 3 3 -----I 8 I -----(seep. 49) multiplier 2 16 G Wetland name or number __ These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS -lndicatol'S that unit functions to provide important habitat H 1. Does the wetland unit have the potential to provide habitat for many species? H 1.1 Vegetation structure (seep. 72) Check the types of vegetation classes present (as defined by Cowardin}-Size threshold for each class is !4 acre or more than 10% of the area if unit is smaller than 2.5 acres. __ Aquatic bed _x_Emergent plants _x_scrub/shrub {areas where shrubs have >30% cover) __ Forested {areas where trees have >30% cover) If the unit has a forested class check if: __ The forested class has 3 out of 5 strata {canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the forested polygon Add the number of vegetation structures that qualify. If you have: Map of Cowardin vegetation classes H 1.2. Hydroperiods (seep. 73} 4 structures or more 3 structures 2 structures 1 structure points= 4 points= 2 points= 1 points= 0 Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods} present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or !4 acre to count. (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods) __ Pennanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present points= 3 points= 2 point= 1 points= 0 _x_s easonally flooded or inundated 3 types present __ Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present ~Saturated only 1 type present __ Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland __ Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland __ Lake-fringe wedand = 2 points __ Freshwater tidal wetland= 2 points Map of hydroperiods H 1.3. Richness of Plant Species (seep. 75) Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 rt2. (different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold} You do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Milfoi/, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, If you counted: > 19 species List species below if you want to: 5 -19 species < 5 species Canadian Thistle points= 2 points= l points= 0 Points (only l score per box) Figure_ 1 Figure_ 1 1 3 Total for page __ _ Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 13 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 G Wetland name or number __ H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats (seep. 76) igure _ Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, medium, low, or none. C) 0 0 None = 0 points Low= 1 point Moderate = 2 points .... l\l ~ [ riparian braided channels] High = 3 points NOTE: If you have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water the ratin is alwa s "hi ". Use ma of Cowardin ve elation classes H 1.5. Special Habitat Features: (seep. 77) Check the habitat features that are present in the wedand. The number of checks is the number of points you put into the next column. __ Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland {>4in. diameter and 6 ft long). __ Standing snags (diameter at the bottom > 4 inches) in the wetland __ Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft (Im) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the unit, for at least 33 ft (10m} __ Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet turned grey/brown} __ At least 'Ai acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated. (structures for egg-laying by amphibians) __ Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in each stratum of plants 1 0 NOTE: The 20 % stated in early printings of the manual on page 78 is an error. ~------------_.;...;;._ _ _:. ______ ...;_..;;._ _________ ~---- H l. TOT AL Score -potential for providing habitat Add the scores from Hl.1, Hl.2, Hl.3, Hl.4, Hl.5 4 ~--------------=---'--=--'--=:::...:.=--'---'--"''--'--"''-==-"-"-;:_:;_-~----~ Comments Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 14 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 G Wetland name or number-~- H 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species? H 2.1 Buffers (seep. 80) Figure~ Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland unit. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See text for definition of "undisturbed. " -100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no-grazing, no landscaping, no daily human use) Points = 5 -100 m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 50% circumference. Points = 4 -50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% circumference. Points = 4 · -100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 25% circumference, . Points = 3 -50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for> 50% circumference. Points = 3 If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above X No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft) of wetland > 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 -No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >50% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 -Heavy grazing in buffer. Points = I -V cgetated buffers are <2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference (e.g. tilled fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points = 0. -Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points = 1 2 Aerial ohoto showina buffers H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (seep. 81) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads, paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor). YES= 4 points (.go to H 2.3) NO= go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 50ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 2 5 acres in size? OR a Lake-fringe wetland, ifit does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? YES= 2 points (.go to H 2.3) NO= H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 Is the wetland: within 5 mi (8km) of a brackish or salt water estuary OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasture (>40 acres) OR within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? 1 YES= I point NO= 0 points 3 Total for page. __ _ Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 15 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 G Wetland name or number __ H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW (see new and complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in the PHS report http://wdfw.wa.gov/hab/phslist.htm) Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft (100m) of the wetland unit? NOTE: the connections do not have to he relatively undisturbed. __ Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.4 ha (1 acre). LBiodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (.full descriptions in MJFW PHS report p. 152). __ Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. __ Old-growth/Mature forests: (Old-growth west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 20 trees/ha (8 trees/acre) > 81 cm (32 in) dbh or> 200 years of age. (Mature forests) Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm (21 in) dbh; crown cover may be less that 100%; crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth: 80 -200 years old west of the Cascade crest. __ Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (tull descriptions in MJFW PHS report p. J 58'J . __ Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. __ Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non-forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in MJFW PHS reportp. 161). __ Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. __ Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition ofrelatively undisturbed are in MJFW report: pp. 167-169 and glossary in Appendix A). __ Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. __ Cliffs: Greater than 7.6 m (25 ft) high and occurring below 5000 ft. __ Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 -2.0 m (0.5 -6.5 ft), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. __ Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of> 51 cm (20 in) in western Washington and are> 2 m (6.5 ft) in height. Priority logs are> 30 cm (12 in) in diameter at the largest end, and> 6 m (20 ft) long. If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats = 4 points If wetland has 2 priority habitats = 3 points If wetland has I priority habitat = 1 point No habitats = 0 points Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list. Nearbv wetlands are addressed in ouestion H 2.4) Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 16 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 1 G Wetland name or number __ H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the one description of the landscape around the wed and that best fits) (seep. 84) There are at least 3 other wetlands within 1h mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK. as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields, or other development. points= 5 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within 'h mile points= 5 There are at least 3 other wetlands within 'h mile, BUT the connections between them are disturbed points= 3 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetland within 'h mile points= 3 There is at least I wetland within ¥2 mile. points= 2 There are no wetlands within 'h mile. points= 0 H 2. TOTAL Score -opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores from H2.l,H2.2, H2.3, H2.4 TOTAL for H 1 from page 14 Total Score for Habitat Functions -add the points for H 1, H 2 and record the result on p. 1 Wetland Rating Form · -western Washington 17 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 3 -----I 7 I I I ----- 4 ----- 11 G Wetland name or number __ CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please determine if the wedand meets the attributes described below and circle the appropriate answers and Category. Wetland Type Category Check off any criteria that apply to the wetland. Circle the Category when the aooropriate criteria are met. SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands (seep. 86} Does the wetland unit meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? -The dominant water regime is tidal, -Vegetated, and -With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. YES = Go to SC 1.1 NOX SC 1.1 Is the wetland unit within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, Cat I National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? YES = Category I XNOgotoSC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland unit at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? YES = Category I NO= Category II Cat. I -The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, Cat. II cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10% cover of non-native plant species. If the non-native Spartina spp. are the only species that cover more than 10% of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual Dual rating (I/II). The area ofSpartina would be rated a Category II while the rating relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a I/II Category I. Do not, however, exclude the area of Spartina in determining the size threshold of 1 acre. -At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a l 00 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. -The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 18 August2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct 2008 G Wetland name or number __ SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands (seep. 87} Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland unit being rated in a Sectionrrownship/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? {this question is used to screen out most sites before you need to contact WNHPIDNR) S/f/R information from Appendix D _ or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site _ YES __ -contact WNHP/DNR (see p. 79) and go to SC 2.2 NOX SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? YES = Category I NO __x_not a Heritage Wetland SC 3.0 Bogs (seep. 87) Does the wetland unit (or any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify if the wedand is a bog. If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. 1. Does the unit have organic soil horizons (i.e. layers of organic soil), either peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils)? Yes - ~~Q.3 X~-~~Q.2 2. Does the unit have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on a lake or pond? Yes -go to Q. 3 X No -Is not a bog for purpose of rating 3. Does the unit have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level. AND other plants, if present, consist of the "bog" species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation (more than 30% of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)? Yes -Is a bog for purpose of rating X No -go to Q. 4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16" deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the "bog" plant species in Table 3 are present, the wetland is a bog. I. Is the unit forested (> 30% cover) with sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Englemann's spruce, or western white pine, WITH any of the species (or combination of species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover (> 30% coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover}? 2. YES = Category I NoX Is not a bog for purpose of rating Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 19 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 Cat. I Cat. I G Wetland name or number __ SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands (seep. 90) Does the wetland unit have at least 1 acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. -Old-growth forests: (west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/acre (20 trees/hectare) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of 32 inches (81 cm) or more. NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests. Two-hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and "OR" so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. -Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are 80 -200 years old OR have average diameters (dbh) exceeding 21 inches (53cm); crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth. YES = Category I Cat. I NO Xnot a forested wetland with special characteristics SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (seep. 91) Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? -The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks -The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured near the bottom) YES= Go to SC 5.1 NOX not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1 Does the wetland meets all of the following three conditions? -The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of invasive plant species (see list of invasive species on p. 74). -At least 'l4 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. -The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre (4350 square feet) YES= Category I NO= Category II Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 20 August2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 Cat. I Cat. II G Wetland name or number __ SC 6.0 Interdunal Wetlands (seep. 93) Is the wetland unit west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? YES -go to SC 6 .1 NO X not an interdunal wetland for rating If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: • Long Beach Peninsula-lands west of SR 103 • Grayland-Westport-lands west of SR 105 • Ocean Shores-Copalis-lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is once acre or larger? · YES = Category II X NO -go to SC 6.2 Cat. II SC 6.2 Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and 1 acre? YES = Category III Cat. III Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics Choose the "highest" rating if wetland/alls into several categories, and record on p.1. If vou answered NO for all tvnes enter ''Not Annlicable" on n.l Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 21 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 H Wetland name or number __ WETLAND RA TING FORM -WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2 -Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users Updated Oct 2008 with the new WDFW definitions for priority habitats Name of wetland (if known): _w_e_tl_a_nd_H ___________ Date of site visit: 0510612009 Rated by Adam Gale and Joe Pursley Trained by Ecology? YesXNo_ Date of training May 2007 SEC: 29 TWNSHP: 24N RNGE: 2-_ Is S/T/R in Appendix D? Yes_ No~ Map of wetland unit: Figure__ Estimated size 0·1 Acre SUMMARY OF RA TING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland I_ II_ IIIX_ IV_ Category I= Score >=70 Category II = Score 51-69 Category III = Score 30-50 Category IV = Score < 30 Score for Water Quality Functions 6 Score for Hydrologic Functions 6 f-------1 Score for Habitat Functions 13 .---..... TOT AL score for Functions 25 Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland I_ II_ Does not Apply X Final Category (<hoo,o th, • ...,_.,"""'°"' frnm ahov<) c:::::J s ummaryo f b . . ti as1c m orma ti b h tl d ·t on a out t e we an urn Wetland Unit has Special · Wetland HGM Class Characteristics used for Ratin!! Estuarine Depressional Natural Heritage Wetland Riverine Bog Lake-fringe Mature Forest Slooe X Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal Lagoon Freshwater Tidal Interdunal None of the above X Check if unit has multiple HGM classes present Wetland Rating Form-western Washington I version 2 To be used with Ecology Publication 04-06-025 August 2004 H Wetland name or number __ Does the wetland unit being rated meet any of the criteria below? If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland . Check List for Wetlands That May Need Additional Protection . YES (in addition to the protection recommended for its cate11:orv) .·' ' SPL Has the wedand unit been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered animal or plant species ([IE species)? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the annrooriate state or federal database. SP2. Has the wedand unit been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or Endangered animal species? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are categorized as Category I Natural Heritage Wetlands (see o. 19 of data form). SP3. Does the wetland unit contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WDFW for the state? SP4. Does the wetland unit have a local significance in addition to its functions? For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having special significance. To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the Hvdrogeomorphic Class of the wedand being rated. . . NO X X X X The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. Seep. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 2 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 H Wetland name or number __ Classification of Wetland Units in Western Washington If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit With multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions l-7 apply, and go to Question 8. I. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during floods)? NO -go to 2 YES -the wetland class is Tidal Fringe If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? YES -Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO -Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) If your wedand can be dassified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wedands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wedand. Wetlands that were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the term "Estuarine" wetland is kept. Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Category I and II estuarine wetlands have changed (see p. ) . 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. NO -go to 3 YES -The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a "Flats" wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet both of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any vegetation on the surface) at least 20 acres (8 ha) in size; _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m)? NO-go to 4 YES-The wetland class is Lake-fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? XThe wetland is on a slope (slope can be veiy graduan. _X__The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow. or in a swale without distinct banks. ~The water leaves the wetland without being impounded? NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type ofwedands except occasionally in veiy small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3ft diameter and Jess than I foot deep). NO -go to 5 YES -The wetland class is Slope Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 3 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 H Wetland name or number __ 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? __ The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river __ The overbank flooding occurs at least once every two years. NOTE: The riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding. NO -go to 6 YES -The wetland class is Riverine 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at some time during the year. This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland .. NO -go to 7 YES -The wetland class is Depressional 7. ls the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding. The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO -go to 8 YES -The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM clases. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is rec.ommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM Classes within the wetland 'unit belni! rated HGMCJas$to UselnRat111ti Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Denressional Slope + Lake-frinee Lake-frinee Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional Deoressional + Lake-frin!!e Deoressional Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under wetland wetlands with special characteristics If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or if you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 4 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August2004 H Wetland name or number __ s Slope Wetlands WATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS -Indicators that the wetland unit functions to •· improve water Quality . s S 1. Does the wetland unit have the I!Otential to improve water quality? s S 1.1 Characteristics of average slope of unit: Slope isl% or less (a 1% slope has a 1 foot vertical drop in elevation for every 100 fl horizontal distance) points= 3 Slope is 1% -2% points= 2 Slope is 2% -5% points= 1 Slope is greater than 5% points= 0 s S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface (or duff layer) is clay or organic (useNRCS definitions) YES = 3 points NO= 0 points s S 1.3 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the vegetation in the wetland. Dense vegetation means you have trouble seeing the soil surface (> 75% cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 inches. Dense, uncut, herbaceous vegetation > 90% of the wetland area points= 6 Dense, uncut, herbaceous vegetation> 1/2 of area points= 3 Dense, woody, vegetation> \lz of area points= 2 Dense, uncut, herbaceous vegetation > 1/4 of area points= I Does not meet any of the criteria above for vegetation points= 0 Aerial ohoto or mao with veaetation oolvaons s Total for S I Add the points in the boxes above s S 2. Does the wetland unit have the ol!portunity to improve water quality? Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland. Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants coming from several sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity. -Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft X Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland X Tilled fields, logging, or orchards within 150 feet of wetland -Residential, urban areas, or golf courses are within 150 ft upslope of wetland -Other YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 s TOTAL -Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from SI by S2 Add score to table on P. 1 Comments Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 11 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 Points (only I score per box) (see p.64) 2 0 Figure_ 1 -----I 3 I -----(see p.67) multiplier 2 -- 6 H Wetland name or number __ s Slope Wetlands HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS . . . . . . Points ,i < s s -Indicators that the wetland 1.m:itfunctionsJo . . ~ reduce .floodinl!' and stream erosion . ,,: S 3. Does the wetland unit have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion? S 3.1 Characteristics of vegetation that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms. · .. Choose the points appropriate for the description that best flt conditions in the wetland. (stems of plants should be thick enough (usually> I/Bin), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows) Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation covers > 90% of the area of the wetland. Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation > 1/2 area of wetland Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation> 1/4 area More than 1/4 of area is grazed, mowed, tilled or vegetation is points= 6 points= 3 !>Dints= 1 not riaid ooints -0 S 3.2 Characteristics of slope wetland that holds back small amounts of flood flows: The slope wetland has small surface depressions that can retain water over at least 10% of its area. YES points = 2 (only 1 score pe,box) 1 2 NO ooints =0 ~-----------------------'-=-_t==='-----4-----s Add the points in the boxes above I 3 I i..::-l---------------------------------~-----s S 4. Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? (seep. 70} s Is the wetland in a landscape position where the reduction in water velocity it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows? Note which of the following conditions apply. -Wetland has surface runoff that drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems X Other Lake Washington is located immediately downslope. (Answer NO if the major source of water is controlled by a reservoir (e.g. wetland is a seep that is on the downstream side of a dam) YES multioller is 2 NO multinller is I Comments TOTAL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from S 3 by S 4 Add score to table on p. I Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 12 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 multiplier 2 6 H Wetland name or number __ These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS -Indicators that unit functions to provideimportant habitat H 1. Does the wetland unit have the potential to provide habitat for many species? H 1.1 Vegetation structure (seep. 72) Check the types of vegetation classes present (as defined by Cowardin}-Size threshold for each class is ~ acre or more than 10% of the area if unit is smaller than 2.5 acres. __ Aquatic bed __x__Emergent plants __x__scrub/shrub (areas where shrubs have >30% cover) _x_Forested (areas where trees have >30% cover) If the unit has a forested class check if: __ The forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the forested polygon Add the number of vegetation structures that qualify. If you have: Map of Cowardin vegetation classes H 1.2. Hydroperiods (seep. 73) 4 structures or more 3 structures 2 structures 1 structure points= 4 points= 2 points= 1 . aoints = 0 Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wedand. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wed and or ~ acre to count. (see text for descripdons of hydroperiods) __ Pennanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present _x_seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present points= 3 points= 2 point= I points= 0 __ Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present XSaturated only 1 type present __ Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland _x_ Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland __ Lake-fringe wedand = 2 points __ Freshwater tidal wedand = 2 points Map of hydroperiods H 1.3. Richness of Plant Species (seep. 75) Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft 2• (different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold) You do not have to name the species. Do not indude Eurasian Milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, If you counted: > 19 species List species below if you want to: 5 -19 species < 5 species Canadian Thistle points= 2 points = I points= 0 Points (only I score per box) Figure_ 2 Figure_ 2 1 5 Total for page __ _ Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 13 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 H Wetland name or number ___ _ H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats {seep. 76) igure _ Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, medium, low, or none. C) 0 0 None = 0 points Low= 1 point Moderate = 2 points ~--- High = 3 points [riparian braided channels] NOTE: If you have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water tbe ratin is alwa s "hi h". Use map of Cowardin ve etation classes H 1.5. Special Habitat Features: (seep. 77) Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points you put into the next column. __ Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (>4in. diameter and 6 ft long). __ Standing snags (diameter at the bottom > 4 inches) in the wetland __ Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft (lm) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the unit, for at least 33 ft (10m) __ Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet turned grey/brown) __ At least \lo acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated. (structures for egg-laying by amphibians) __ Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in each stratum of plants 2 0 NOTE: The 20 % stated in early printings of the manual on page 78 is an error. ~-----------------=--------=--=----------~----H 1. TOT AL Score -potential for providing habitat 7 Add the scores from HJ.I, Hl.2, Hl.3, Hl.4, Hl.5 ~--------------=-'.....:..==-=--==============------~ I I Comments Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 14 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 H Wetland name or number __ H 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species? H 2.1 Buffers (seep. 80) Figure_ Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland unit. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See text for definition of "undisturbed." -100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no-grazing, no landscaping, no daily human use) Points = 5 -100 m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 50% circumference. Points = 4 -50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% circumference. Points = 4 -100 m (330ft) ofrelatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 25% circumference, . Points = 3 -50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for> 50% circumference. Points = 3 If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above -No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft) of wetland > 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 -No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >50% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 -Heavy grazing in buffer. Points= l -Vegetated buffers are <2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference (e.g. tilled fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points = 0. X Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points = I 1 Aerial ohoto showino buffers H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (seep. 81) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads, paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor) . YES= 4 points (go to H 2.3) NO= go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that ls at least 50ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake-fringe wetland, if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? YES= 2 points (go to H 2.3) NO= H 2.2.3 H 2. 2 .3 Is the wetland: within 5 ml (8km) of a brackish or salt water estuary OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasture (>40 acres) OR within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? 1 YES = 1 point NO = 0 points 2 Total for page __ _ \}'etland Rating Form -western Washington 15 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 H Wetland name or number __ H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW (see new and complete descriptions of WDFW priorily habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in the PHS report http://wdfw.wa.gov/hablphs/ist.htm) Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft (lOOm) of the wetland unit? NOTE; the connections do not have to be relatively undisturbed. __ Aspen Stands: Pure or nuxed stands of aspen greater than 0.4 ha (1 acre) . .1LBiodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WFW PHS report p. 152). __ Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. __ Old-growth/Mature forests: (Old-growth west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 20 trees/ha (8 trees/acre) > 81 cm (32 in) dbh or> 200 years of age. <Mature forests) Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm (21 in) dbh; crown cover may be less that 100%; crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth; 80 -200 years old west of the Cascade crest. __ Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in MJFW PHS report p. 158). __ Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. __ Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non-forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WFW PHS report p. 161}. __ Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. __ Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshorc. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition ofrelatively undisturbed are in MJFW report: pp. 167-169 and glossary in Appendix A). __ Caves: A naturally occuning cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. __ Cliffs: Greater than 7 .6 m (25 ft) high and occurring below 5000 ft. __ Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 -2.0 m (0.5 -6.5 ft), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. __ Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of> 51 cm {20 in) in western Washington and are> 2 m (6.5 ft) in height. Priority logs are> 30 cm (12 in) in diameter at the largest end, and > 6 m (20 ft) long. If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats ; 4 points If wetland has 2 priority habitats ; 3 points If wetland has 1 priority habitat ; 1 point No habitats ; 0 points Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list. Nearby wetlands are addressed in question H 2. 4) Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 16 August2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 1 H Wetland name or number __ H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland that best fits) (seep. 84) There are al least 3 other wetlands within l'l mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill. fields, or other development. points= 5 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within l'l mile points= 5 There are at least 3 other wetlands within l'l mile, BUT the connections between them are disturbed points= 3 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetland within l'l mile points= 3 There is at least I wetland within l'l mile. points= 2 There are no wetlands within ¥2 mile. points= 0 H 2. TOT AL Score -opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores from H2.l,H2.2, H2.3, H2.4 TOT AL for H 1 from page 14 Total Score for Habitat Functions -add the points for H 1, H 2 and record the result on n. 1 Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 17 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 3 -----I 6 I I I ----- 7 ----- 13 H Wetland name or number __ CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please determine if the wedand meets the attributes described below and circle the appropriate answers and Category. Wetland Type Category Check off any criteria that apply to the wetland. Circle the Category when the annropriate criteria are met. SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands (seep. 86) Does the wetland unit meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? -The dominant water regime is tidal, -Vegetated, and -With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. YES= Go to SC 1.1 NO - SC 1.1 Is the wetland unit within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, Cat. I National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? YES = Categorv I NO go to SC 1.2 SC 1. 2 ls the wetland unit at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? YES = Category I NO = Category II Cat. I -The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, Cat. II cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10% cover of non-native plant species. If the non-native Spartina spp. are the only species that cover more than 10% of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual Dual rating (I/II) . The area of Spartina would be rated a Category II while the rating relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a I/II Category I. Do not, however, exclude the area of Spartina in determining the size threshold of 1 acre. -At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. -The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 18 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 H Wetland name or number __ SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands (seep. 87) Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Prograrn/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland unit being rated in a Section/I'ownship/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? {this question is used to screen out most sites before you need to contact WNHPIDNR) S/T/R information from Appendix D _ or accessed from WNHPillNR web site _ YES __ -contact WNHP/DNR (seep. 79) and go to SC 2.2 NO_ SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? YES= Category I NO __ not a Heritage Wetland SC 3.0 Bogs (seep. 87) Does the wetland unit (or any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify if the wetland is a bog. If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. 1. Does the unit have organic soil horizons (i.e. layers of organic soil), either peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils)? Yes - gotoQ.3 No -gotoQ.2 2. Does the unit have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on a lake or pond? Yes -go to Q. 3 No -Is not a bog for purpose of rating 3. Does the unit have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND other plants, if present, consist of the "bog" species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation (more than 30% of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)? Yes -Is a bog for purpose of rating No -go to Q. 4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory you may substitute that criterion by measuring tbe pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16" deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the "bog" plant species in Table 3 are present, the wetland is a bog. 1. Is the unit forested (> 30% cover) with sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Englemann' s spruce, or western white pine, WITH any of the species (or combination of species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover(> 30% coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover)? 2. YES= Category I No_ Is not a bog for purpose of rating Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 19 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 Cat. I Cat. I H Wetland name or number __ SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands (seep. 90) Does the wetland unit have at least 1 acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. -Old-growth forests: (west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/acre (20 trees/hectare) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of 32 inches (81 cm) or more. NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests. Two-hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and "OR" so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. -Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are 80 -200 years old OR have average diameters (dbh) exceeding 21 inches (53cm); crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth. YES = Category I NO _not a forested wetland with special characteristics SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (seep. 91) Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? -The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks -The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured near the bottom) YES = Go to SC 5.1 NO_ not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1 Does the wetland meets all of the following three conditions? -The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of invasive plant species (see list of invasive species on p. 7 4). -At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. -The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre ( 4350 square feet) YES = Category I NO = Category II Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 20 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 Cat. I Cat. I Cat. II H Wetland name or number __ SC 6.0 Interdunal Wetlands (seep. 93} Is the wetland unit west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? YES -go to SC 6.1 NO _ not an interdunal wetland for rating If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. In practical tenns that means the following geographic areas: • Long Beach Peninsula-lands west of SR 103 • Grayland-Westport-lands west of SR 105 • Ocean Shores-Copalis-lands west of SR 115 and SR I 09 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is once acre or larger? YES = Category II NO -go to SC 6.2 Cat. II SC 6.2 Is the unit between 0.1 and l acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between O .1 and l acre? YES = Category III Cat. III Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics Gho.ose the "highest" rating if wetland falls into several catesories, and record on p,J. If you answered NO for all types enter "Not Aoolicable" on o.l Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 21 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 I Wetland name or number __ _ WETLAND RATING FORM-WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2 -Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users Updated Oct 2008 with the new WDFW definitions for priority habitats Name of wetland (if known): _w_e_ll_a_nd_l ___________ Date of site visit: 0611912009 Rated by Adam Gale and Joe Pursley Trained by Ecology? Y esXNo_ Date of training May 2007 SEC:~ TWNSHP: 24 N RNGE: ~ Is S/T/R in Appendix D? Yes_ NoX Map of wetland unit: Figure _2 _ Estimated size o.o 5 Acre SUMMARY OF RATING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland I_ II_ IIIX IV_ Category I= Score >=70 Category II = Score 51-69 Category III = Score 30-50 Cate1;orv IV = Score < 30 Score for Water Quality Functions 18 1-----1 Score for Hydrologic Functions 16 1-----1 Score for Habitat Functions 9 .,_ __ ..... TOT AL score for Functions 43 Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland I_ II_ Does not Apply X Final Category (<h-th, .. ,...,,, • .,,.,...,. from •hon) D s urnmarv o f b . . f, ti as1c m orma b tth ona ou tJ d "t ewe an um Wetland Unit has Special Wetland HGM Class Characteristics used for Ratine Estuarine Deoressional y Natural Heritaee Wetland Riverine Bog Lake-fringe Mature Forest Slope Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal La11oon Freshwater Tidal Interdunal None of the above X Check if unit has multiple HGM classes present Wetland Rating Form-western Washington I version 2 To be used with Ecology Publication 04-06-025 August 2004 I Wetland name or number __ Does the wetland unit being rated meet any of the criteria below? . If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in Jhe wetland. ·_: ' ' -' . .;.,. YES Check List for Wetlands That May Need Additional Protection (in addition to the protection recommended for its categorv)f . SPl. Has the wedand unit been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered animal or plant species (]'IE species}? For the purposes of this rating system, "docwnented" means the wetland is on the aooropriate state or federal database. SP2. Has the wedand unit been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or Endangered animal species? For the purposes of this rating system, "docwnented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are cate1zorized as Categorv I Natural Heritage Wetlands (see p. 19 of data form). SP3. Does the wedand unit contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WDFW for the state? SP4. Does the wedand unit have a local significance in addition to its functions? For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having special significance. To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the Hydrogeomorphic Class of the wedand being rated. . .. NO X X X X The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. See p. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 2 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 I Wetland name or number __ Classification of Wetland Units in Western Washington If the hydrologic criteria.listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you pI;Obably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question 8. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during floods)? NO -go to 2 YES -the wetland class is Tidal Fringe If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? YES -Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO -Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. !fit is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wetland. Wetlands that were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the term "Estuarine" wetland is kept. Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Category I and II estuarine wetlands have changed (see p. ) . 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. NO -go to 3 YES -The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a "Flats" wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. · 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet both of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any vegetation on the surface) at least 20 acres (8 ha) in size; _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m)? NO -go to 4 YES -The wetland class is Lake-fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? __ The wetland is on a slope (slope can be ve.ry gradual), __ The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks. __ The water leaves the wetland without being impounded? NOTE: Surface water does not pond ill these type of wetlands except occasionally ill ve.ry small and shallow depressions or behilld hummocks (depressions are usually < 3ft diameter and less than 1 foot deep). NO -go to 5 YES -The wetland class is Slope Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 3 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 I Wetland name or number __ 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? __ The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river __ The overbank flooding occurs at least once every two years. NOTE: The riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding. NO -go to 6 YES -The wetland class is Riverine 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at some time during the year. This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO -go to 7 YES -The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding. The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO -go to 8 YES -The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM clases. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM Classes within the wetland un1t beinf! rated HGM Class to Use in Ratin!! · Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Slope + Lake-frine:e Lake-fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional Depressional + Lake-frine:e Deoressional Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under wetland wetlands with special characteristics If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or if you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. • Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 4 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August2004 I Wetland name or number __ D Depressional and Flats Wetlands VVATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS -Indicators that the wetland unit functions to ' improve water au,tlitv ·. · D D 1. Does the wetland unit have the I!Otential to improve water quality? D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: D Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points= 3 Unit has an intermittently flowing. OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points= 2 Unit has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet (permanently flowing) points = I Unit is a "flat" depression (Q. 7 on key). or in the Flats class, with permanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch points= 1 (If ditch is not permanently flowing treat unit as "intermittently flowing") Provide Photo or drawina S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface (or duff layer) is clay or organic (use NRCS D de/lnitions) YES points= 4 NO points= 0 D 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation (emergent, shrub, and/or forest Cowardin class) D Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation>= 95% of area points= 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation>= 1/2 of area points= 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation > = 1/10 of area points= 1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation <1/10 of area points= 0 Map of Cowardin veoetation classes D 1.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation. D This is the area of the wetland unit that is ponded for at least 2 months, but dries out sometime during the year. Do not count the area that is permanently ponded. Estimate area as the average condition 5 out of 10 JTS. Area seasonally ponded is > 'h total area of wetland points= 4 Area seasonally ponded is > V.. total area of wetland points= 2 Area seasonally ponded is< V.. total area of wetland points= 0 Mao of Hvdrooeriods D Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above D D 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to improve water quality? Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradicnt from the wetland. Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants coming from several sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity. -Grazing in the wetland or within I 50 ft X Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland -Tilled fields or orchards within 150 ft of wetland -A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas, residential areas, farmed fields, roads, or clear-cut logging -Residential. urban areas, golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland -Wetland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen -Other YES multiolier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 D TOTAL -Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from Dl by D2 Add score to table on p. 1 Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 5 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 Points (only 1 score per box) (seep.38) Figure_ 2 0 Figure_ 3 Figure_ 4 -----I 9 I -----(seep. 44} multiplier 2 -- 18 I Welland name or number __ D Depressional and Flats Wetlands HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS -Indicators that the wetland unit functions to reduce floodine: and stream dee:radation D 3. Does the wetland unit have the !lOtential to reduce flooding and erosion? D D 3.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland unit Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points= 4 Unit has an intermittently flowing, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points= 2 Unit is a "flat" depression (Q. 7 on key), or in the Flats class, with permanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch points= I (If ditch is not pennanently flowing treat unit as "intermittently flowing '1 Unit has an unconstricted, or sliehtlv constricted, surface outlet ·1 =rmanentlv flowinnl noints -0 D D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the oudet. For units with no outlet measure from the surface of permanent water or deepest part (if dry). Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points= 7 The wetland is a "headwater'' wetland" points= 5 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points= 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points= 3 Unit is flat (yes to Q. 2 or Q. 7 on key) but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points= 1 Marks of ooncline less than O .5 ft =ints -0 D D 3.3 Contribution of wetland unit to storage in the watershed Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itsell The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of unit points= 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points= 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points= 0 Entire unit is in the FLATS class ooints = 5 D TotalforD 3 Add the points in the boxes above D D 4. Does the wetland unit have the O!l!lOrtunity to reduce flooding and erosion? Answer YES if the unit is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage, or reduction in water velocity, it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Answer NO if the water coming into the wetland is controlled by a structure such as flood gate, tide gate, flap valve, reservoir etc. OR you estimate that more than 90% of the water in the wetland is from groundwater in areas where damaging groundwater flooding does not occur. Note which of the following indicators of opportunity apply. -Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems -Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems X Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might otherwise - flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems -Other YES multiolier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 D TOT AL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4 Add score to table on p. 1 Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 6 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 Points (only I score per box) (seep.46) 2 3 3 -----I 8 I -----(seep. 49) multiplier 2 16 I Wetland name or number __ . These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. . HABITAT FUNCTIONS -Indicators that unit functions to provide important habitat H 1. Does the wetland unit have the potential to provide habitat for many species? H 1.1 Vegetation structure (seep. 72} Check the types of vegetation classes present (as defined by Cowardin)-Size threshold for each class ls 14 acre or more than 10% of the area if unit is smaller than 2.S acres. __ Aquatic bed __ Emergent plants _x_scrub/shrub (areas where shrubs have >30% cover) __ Forested (areas where trees have >30% cover) If the unit has a forested class check if: __ The forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub-canopy. shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the forested polygon Add the number of vegetation structures that qualil'y. If you have: Map of Cowardin vegetation classes H 1.2. Hydroperiods (seep. 73) 4 structures or more 3 structures 2 structures 1 structure points= 4 points= 2 points= 1 points= 0 Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or 14 acre to count. (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods) __ Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present _x_seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present points= 3 points= 2 point= 1 points= 0 _x_occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present _x_saturated only 1 type present __ Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland __ Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland __ Lake-fringe wetland = 2 points __ Freshwater tidal wetland= 2 points Map of hydroperiods H 1.3. Richness of Plant Species (seep. 7S) Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft 2• (different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold} You do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, If you counted: > 19 species List species below if you want to: 5 -19 species < 5 species Canadian Thistle points= 2 points= 1 points= 0 Points (only l score peroox) . Figure_ 0 Figure_ 2 a 2 Total for page __ _ Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 13 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 I Wetland name or number __ H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats (seep. 76) igure _ Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation classes (described in H I.I), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, medium, low, or none. C) 0 0 None = 0 points Low= 1 point Moderate = 2 points ··~~· ~ High = 3 points [riparian braided channels] NOTE: If you have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water the ratio is alwa s "hi ". Use ma of Cowardin ve etation classes H 1.5. Special Habitat Features: (seep. 77) Check the habitEt features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points you put into the next column. __ Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (>4in. diameter and 6 ft long). __ Standing snags (diameter at the bottom > 4 inches) in the wetland __ Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft (Im) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the unit, for at least 33 ft (IOm) __ Stable steep banks of fme material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet turned grey/brown} __ At least 'A acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated. (structures for egg-laying by amphibians) __ Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in each stratum of plants 1 0 NOTE: The 20 % stated in early printings of the manual on page 78 Is an error. ~---------------------------------~----H 1. TOT AL Score -potential for providing habitat I 3 ._ ____________ A_d_~_lh_e_~_o_res_m_o_m_H_l.~1,~H_l_.2~,_H_l~.3~,~H~l_.4~,_H~l~.5---1 ____ _ Comments Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 14 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 I Wetland name or number __ H 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species? H 2.1 Buffers (seep. 80) Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland unit. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetiaod is to be used in the rating. See text for definition of "undisturbed. " -100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no-grazing, no landscaping, no daily human use) Points = 5 -100 m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 50% circumference. Points = 4 -50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% circumference. Points = 4 -100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water> 25% circumference, . Points = 3 -50 m {170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas. or open water for > 50% circumference. Points = 3 If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above -No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m {80ft) of wetland> 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 -No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >50% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 -Heavy grazing in buffer. Points = 1 -Vegetated buffers are <2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference (e.g. tilled fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points= 0. X Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points = 1 Aerial ohoto showina buffers H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (seep. 81) H 2.2.1 fa the wetland part af a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in ripariao corridors, heavily used gravel roads, paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor). YES= 4 points (go to H 2.3) NO =goto H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 50ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? 0 R a Lake-fringe wetland, if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? YES= 2 points (go to H 2.1) NO= H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 Is the wetland: within 5 mi (8km) of a brackish or salt water estuary OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasture (>40 acres) OR within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? YES = 1 point NO = 0 points Figure_ 1 1 2 Total for page __ _ Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 15 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 I Wetland name or number __ H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priori1y habitats listed by WDFW (see new and complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in the PHS report hftJJ:llwdfw. wa. gov!hablphslist.htm) Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft (1 OOm) of the wetland unit? NOTE: the connections do not have to be relatively undisturbed. __ Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.4 ha (1 acre). _.X_Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 152). __ Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. __ Old-growth/Mature forests: (Old-growth west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 20 trees/ha (8 trees/acre) > 81 cm (32 in) dbh or > 200 years of age. (Mature forests) Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm (21 in) dbh; crown cover may be less that 100%; crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth; 80 -200 years old west of the Cascade crest. _ Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158}. __ Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. __ Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non-forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161). __ Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. __ Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the deflnition of relatively undisturbed are in WFW report: pp. 167-169 and glossary in Appendix A). __ Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. __ Cliffs: Greater than 7.6 m (25 ft) high and occurring below 5000 ft. __ Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 -2.0 m (0.5 -6.5 ft), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. __ Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of> 51 cm (20 in) in western Washington and are > 2 m (6.5 ft) in height. Priority logs arc> 30 cm (12 in) in diameter at the largest end, and > 6 m (20 ft) long. If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats = 4 points If wetland has 2 priority habitats = 3 points If wetland has 1 priority habitat = 1 point No habitats = 0 points Note: All vegetated wedands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list. Nearby wedands are addressed in Question H 2. 4) Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 16 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 1 I Wetland name or number __ H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland that best fits) (seep. 84) There are at least 3 other wetlands within 'h mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed (light gra.,;ing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields, or other development. points= S The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within 'h mile points= 5 There are at least 3 other wetlands within 'h mile, BUT the connections between them are disturbed points= 3 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetland within \12 mile points= 3 There is at least 1 wetland within 'h mile. points= 2 There are no wetlands within 1h mile. points= () H 2. TOTAL Score -opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores from H2.1,H2.2, H2.3, H2.4 TOTAL for H 1 from page 14 Total Score for Habitat Functions -add the points for H 1, H 2 and record the result on o. I Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 17 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 3 -----I 6 I I I ----- 3 ----- 9 I Wetland name or number __ CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described below and circle the appropriate answers and Category. Wetland Type Category Check off any criteria that apply to the wetland. Circle the Category when the annropriate criteria are met. SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands (seep. 86) Does the wetland unit meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? -The dominant water regime is tidal, -Vegetated, and -With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. YES: Go to SC 1.1 NO.X SC 1.1 Is the wetland unit within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, Cat. I National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? YES : Category I XND go to SC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland unit at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? YES "' Category I NO: Category II Cat. I -The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, Cat. II cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10% cover of non-native plant species. If the non-native Spartina spp. are the only species that cover more than 10% of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual Dual rating (1/11). The area of Spartina would be rated a Category II while the rating relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a I/II Category I. Do not, however, exclude the area of Spartina in determining the size threshold of 1 acre. -At least :it. of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. -The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels, • depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 18 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 I Wetland name or number __ SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands (seep. 87) Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland unit being rated in a Section/fownship/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? (this question is used to screen out most sites before you need to contact WNHPIDNR) S/T/R information from Appendix D _ or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site _ YES __ -contact WNHP/DNR (see p. 79) and go to SC 2.2 NOX SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? YES= Category I NO ___x_not a Heritage Wetland SC 3.0 Bogs (seep. 87) Does the wetland unit (or any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify if the wetland is a bog. If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wedand based on its functions. 1. Does the unit have organic soil horizons (i.e. layers of organic soil), either peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils)? Yes - gnroQ.3 X~-gnroQ2 2. Does the unit have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on a lake or pond? Yes -go to Q. 3 X No -Is not a bog for purpose of rating 3. Does the unit have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND other plants, if present, consist of the "bog" species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation (more than 30% of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)? Yes-Is a bog for purpose of rating X No -go to Q. 4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16" deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the "bog" plant species in Table 3 are present, the wetland is a bog. 1. Is the unit forested (> 30% cover) with sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Englemann's spruce, or western white pine, WITH any of the species (or combination of species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover(> 30% coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover)? 2. YES = Category I NoX Is not a bog for purpose of rating Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 19 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 Cat. I Cat. I I Wetland name or number __ SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands (seep. 90} Does the wetland unit have at least 1 acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? lfyou answer yes you will still need to rate the wedand based on its functions. -Old-growth forests: (west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/acre (20 trees/hectare) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of 32 inches (81 cm) or more. NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests. Two-hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and "OR" so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. -Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are 8D-200 years old OR have average diameters (dbh) exceeding 21 inches (53cm}; crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth. Cat. I NO X not a forested wetland with special characteristics YES = Category I SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (seep. 91) Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? -The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks -The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon {needs to be measured near the bottom) YES= Go to SC 5.1 NOX not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1 Does the wetland meets all of the following three conditions? -The wetland is relative! y undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of invasive plant species (see list of invasive species on p. 7 4). -At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a 1 OD ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. -The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre ( 4350 square feet) YES= Category I NO= Category II Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 20 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 Cat. I Cat. II I Wetland name or number __ SC 6.0 Interdunal Wetlands (seep. 93} Is the wetland unit west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? YES -go to SC 6.1 NO X not an interdunal wetland for rating If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wedand based on its functions. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: • Long Beach Peninsula-lands west of SR 103 • Grayland-Westport-lands west of SR 105 • Ocean Shores-Copalis-lands west of SR 115 and SR I 09 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is once acre or larger? YES = Category II X NO -go to SC 6.2 Cat. II SC 6.2 Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and 1 acre? YES = Category III Cat. III Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics Choose the "highest" rating if wetland falls into several categories, and record on p.J. If you answered NO for all types enter "Not Aoolicable" on o.1 Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 21 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 J Wetland name or number __ WETLAND RATING FORM-WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2 -Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users Updated Oct 2008 with the new WDFW definitions for priority habitats Name of wetland (if known): _w_e_ll_an_d_J ___________ Date of site visit: 0611912009 Rated by Adam Gale and Joe Pursley Trained by Ecology? YesXNo_ Date of training May 2007 SEC: ~ TWNSHP: 24 N RNGE: ~ Is S/f/R in Appendix D? Yes_ No.X Map of wetland unit: Figure _2 _ Estimated size 0·1 Acre SUMMARY OF RATING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland I_ II_ HIX IV_ Category I = Score >= 70 Category II = Score 51-69 Category III = Score 30-50 Category IV = Score < 30 Score for Water Quality Functions 14 1-------1 Score for Hydrologic Functions 1 o 1------1 Score for Habitat Functions 14 ... __ ....,. TOTAL score for Functions 38 Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland I_ II_ Does not Apply X Final Category (,,,,~ the "b;gh-""''" from ·•~•) D Summarv o basic in ormation a out t e we an f b h tl d unit Wetland Unit has Special Wetland HGM Class Characteristics used for Rating Estuarine Depressional V Natural Heritage Wetland Riverine Bog Lake-frimie Mature Forest Slope X Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal Lagoon Freshwater Tidal Interdunal None of the above X Check if unit has multiple X HGM classes oresent Wetland Rating Form -western Washington August2004 version 2 To be used with Ecology Publication 04-06-025 J Wetland name or number __ Does the wetland unit being rated meet any of the criteria below? If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland . . . · .· Check List for Wetlands That May Need Additional Protection . YES, NO (in addition to the orotection recommended for Its categorv) · ,--:·- SPl. Has the wetland unit been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered animal or plant species (TIE species}? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the aoorooriate state or federal database. SP2. Has the wetland unit been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or Endangered animal species? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are categorized as Categorv I Natural Heritage Wetlands (see o. 19 of data form). SP3. Does the wetland unit contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WFW for the state? SP4. Does the wetland unit have a local significance in addition to its functions? For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having special significance. To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the Hydrogeomorphic Class of the wedand being rated. X X X X The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. See p. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 2 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 J Wetland name or number __ Classification of Wetland Units in Western Washington If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated,.you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question 8. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during floods)? NO -go to 2 YES -the wetland class is Tidal Fringe If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? YES -Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO -Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) If your wedand can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wedands. !fit is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wedand. Wetlands that were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the term "Estuarine" wetland is kept. Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Category I and II estuarine wetlands have changed (see p. ). 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. NO -go to 3 YES -The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a "Flats" wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet both of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any vegetation on the surface) at least 20 acres (8 ha) in size; _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m)? NO -go to 4 YES -The wetland class is Lake-fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? ..X The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), X The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks. __ The water leaves the wetland without being impounded? NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type ofwedands except occasionaJly in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3ft diameter and Jess than I foot deep). NO -go to 5 YES -The wetland class is Slope Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 3 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 J Wetland name or number __ 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? __ The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river __ The-overbank flooding occurs at least once every two years. NOTE: The riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding. NO -go to 6 YES -The wetland class is Riverine 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at some time during the year. This means that any oudet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wedand. NO -go to 7 YES -The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding. The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO -go to 8 YES -The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM clases. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1"7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS 1N THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area . HGM Classes within the wetwid unit bein£ rated . · HGMCiB.ss,to}JseJn Ra.tin£ . . Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Deoressional Slone + Lake-fringe Lake" fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional Depressional + Lake-fringe Depressional Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under wetland wetlands with special characteristics If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or if you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 4 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 J Wetland name or number __ D Depressional and Flats Wetlands WATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS -Indicators that the wetland unit functions to improve water qualitv . D D 1. Does the wetland unit have the jlOtential to improve water quality? D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: D Unit ls a depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points= 3 Unit has an intermittently flowing. OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points= 2 Unit has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted. surface outlet (permanently flowing) points= I Unit is a "flat" depression (Q. 7 on key), or in the Flats class, with permanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch points= I (If ditch is not permanently flowing treat unit as "intermittently flowing') Provide photo or drawinA S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface (or duff layer) is clay or organic {use NRCS D deI'mitions) YES points= 4 NO points= 0 D 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation (emergent, shrub, and/or forest Cowardin class) D Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation>= 95% of area points= 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation>= 1/2 of area points= 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation>= 1/10 of area points= 1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation <1/10 of area points= 0 Map of Cowardin vecietation classes D 1.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation. D This is the area of the wetland unit that is ponded for at least 2 months, but dries out sometime during the year. Do not count the area that is permanendy ponded. Estimate area as the average condition 5 out of 10 yrs. Area seasonally ponded is > !I', total area of wetland points= 4 Area seasonally ponded ls > '/.i total area of wetland points= 2 Area seasonal! y ponded is < 114 total area of wetland points= 0 Mao of Hvdrooeriods D Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above D D 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to improve water quality? Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland. Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants coming from several sources, but any single source would qualify as.opportunity. -Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft X Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland X Tilled fields or orchards within 150 ft of wetland A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas, residential areas, farmed fields, roads, or clear-cut logging -Residential. urban areas, golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland -Wetland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen -Other YES multiolier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 D TOTAL -Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from Dl by D2 Add score to table on p. 1 Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 5 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 Points (only I score per box) (seep.38} Figure_ 2 0 Figure_ 3 Figure_ 2 -----I 7 I -----(seep. 44) multiplier 2 -- 14 j Wetland name or number __ D Depressional and Flats Wetlands HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS -Indicators that the wetland unit functions to reduce flooding and stream dei;rradation D 3. Does the wetland unit have the 11otential to reduce flooding and erosion? D D 3.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland unit Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points= 4 Unit has an intermittently flowing, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points= 2 Unit is a "flat" depression (Q. 7 on key), or in the Flats class, with permanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch points= I (JJ ditch is not pennanently flowing treat unit as "intermittently flowing") Unit has an unconstricted, or sliehtlv constricted, surface outlet -, n,,rmanentlv Jlowine) ooints -0 D D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For units with no outlet measure from the surface of permanent water or deepest part (if dry}. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points= 7 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland" points= 5 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points= 5 Marks are at least O .5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points= 3- Unit is flat (yes to Q. 2 or Q. 7 on key) but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points= l Marks of oondlm! less than 0.5 ft ooints = 0 D D 3. 3 Contribution of wetland unit to storage in the watershed Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wedand lo the area of the wed and unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of unit points= 5 The area of the basin is 10 to l 00 times the area of the unit points= 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points= 0 Entire unit is in the FLATS class points= 5 D Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above D D 4. Does the wetland unit have the 01111ortunity to reduce flooding and erosion? Answer YES if the unit is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage, or reduction In water velocity, it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Answer NO if the water corning into the wetland is controlled by a structure such as flood gate, tide gate, flap valve, reservoir etc. OR you estimate that more than 90% of the water in the wetland is from groundwater in areas where damaging groundwater flooding does not occur. Note which of the following indicators of opportunity apply. -Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems -Wetland drains to a river or stream that bas flooding problems X Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might otherwise flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems X Other primary hydrology source from WSDOT pond YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 D TOT AL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4 Add score to table on p. 1 Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 6 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August 2004 Points (only I score per box) (seep.46} 2 3 0 -----I 5 I -----(seep. 49) multiplier 2 10 J Wetland name or number __ These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS -Indicators that unit functions to provide important habitat H 1. Does the wetland unit have the potential to provide habitat for many species? H 1.1 Vegetation structure (seep. 72) Check the types of vegetation classes present {as defined by Cowardin)-Size threshold for each class is % acre or more than 10% of the area if unit is smaller than 2.5 acres. __ Aquatic bed __x_ Emergent plants __x_scrub/shrub (areas where shrubs have >30% cover) __ Forested (areas where trees have >30% cover) If the unit has a forested class check if: __ The forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the forested polygon Add the number of vegetation structures that qualify. If you have: Map of Cowardin vegetation classes H 1.2. Hydroperiods (seep. 73) 4 structures or more 3 structures 2 structures l structure points= 4 points= 2 points= 1 points= 0 Check the types of water regimes {hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or % acre to count. (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods) _K_Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present points= 3 points= 2 point= 1 points= 0 __x_seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present _x_ Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present _x_ Saturated only 1 type present __ Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland __ Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland __ Lake-fringe wetland = 2 points __ Freshwater tidal wetland= 2 points Map of hydroperiods H 1.3. Richness of Plant Species (seep. 75) Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold) You do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Mil/oil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, lf you counted: > 19 species List species below if you want to: 5 -19 species < 5 species (different patches Canadian Thisde points= 2 points= I points= 0 Points (only 1 score per box) Figure_ 1 Figure_ 3 5 Total for page __ _ Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 13 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 J Wetland name or number __ H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats (seep. 76) igure _ Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, medium, low, or none. C) 0 0 None = 0 points Low= 1 point Moderate = 2 points ~~-,-/ [riparian braided channels) NOTE: If you have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water the ratin is alwa s "hi ". Use ma of Cowardin v elation classes H 1.5. Special Habitat Features: (seep. 77) Check the habitat feacures that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points you put into the next column. __ Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (>4in. diameter and 6 ft long). _1$__Standing snags (diameter at the bottom > 4 inches) in the wetland __ Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft (lm) over a stream (or ditch) in, or. contiguous with the unit, for at least 33 ft (!Om) __ Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30degree slope) OR sigos of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet CUrned grey/brown) _x_At least V.. acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated. {structures for egg-laying by amphibians) __ Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in each stratum of plants NOTE: The 20 % stated in early printings of the manual on page 78 is an error. 1 2 r---------------------------------~----H I. TOT AL Score -potential for providing habitat I 8 '-------------'A~d=d~m:::..::...es=c=o=re=s~m~o=m~H=l=·~l,~H~l~.2~.~H=l~.3~,~H=l~.4~,=H=J~.5'-<-1----~ Comments Wetland Rating .Form -western Washington 14 August2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 J Wetland name or number __ H 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species? H 2.1 Buffers (seep. 80) Figure_ Choose the description that best reprnsents condition of buffer of wetland unit. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See text for definition of "undisturbed. " -I 00 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no-grazing, no landscaping, no daily human use) Points = 5 -100 m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 50% circumference. Points = 4 -50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% circumference. Points = 4 -100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water> 25% circumference, . Points = 3 -50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for> 50% circumference. Points = 3 If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above -No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft) of wetland > 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 -No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >50% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 -Heavy grazing in buffer. Points = 1 -Vegetated buffers are <2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference (e.g. tilled fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points= 0. X Buffer docs not meet any of the criteria above. Points = I 1 Aerial ohoto showina buffers H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (seep. 81) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads, paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor). YES= 4 points (go to H 2.3'} NO =goto H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 50ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake-fringe wetland, ifit does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? YES = 2 points (go to H 2.3) NO = H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 Is the wetland: within 5 mi (8km) of a brackish or salt water estuary OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasture (>40 acres) OR within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? 1 YES = I point NO = 0 points 2 Total for page __ _ Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 15 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 J Wetland name or number __ H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW {see new and complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in the PHS report http://wdfw.wa.gov!hab!phslist.htm) Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft (100ml of the wetland unit? NOTE: the connections do not have to be relatively undisturbed. __ Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.4 ha (1 acre). LBiodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 152). __ Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. __ Old-growth/Mature forests: (Old-growth west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 20 trees/ha (8 trees/acre) > Bl .cm (32 in) dbh or > 200 years of age. /Mature forests) Stands . with average diameters exceeding 53 cm (21 in) dbh; crown cover may be less that 100%; crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth; 80 -200 years old west of the Cascade crest. __ Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (filll descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158). __ Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. __ Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non-forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161). __ Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. __ Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (filll descriptions of habitats and the definition ofreiatively undisturbed are in WDFW report: pp. 167-169 and glossary in Appendix A). __ Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. __ Cliffs: Greater than 7 .6 m (25 ft) high and occurring below 5000 ft. __ Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 -2.0 m (0.5 -6.5 ft}, composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. __ Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of> 51 cm (20 in) in western Washington and are> 2 m (6.5 ft) in height. Priority logs are > 30 cm (12 in) in diameter at the largest end, and > 6 m (20 ft) long. If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats = 4 points If wetland has 2 priority habitats = 3 points If wetland has 1 priority habitat = 1 point No habitats = 0 points Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not induded in this list. Nearby wetlands are addressed in question H 2.4) Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 16 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct 2008 1 j Wetland name or number __ H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland that best fits) (seep. 84) There are at least 3 other wetlands within 'h mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields, or other development. points= 5 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within 'h mile points= 5 There are at least 3 other wetlands within 'h mile, BUT the connections between them are disturbed points= 3 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetland within 'h mile points= 3 There is at least 1 wetland within 'h mile. points= 2 There are no wetlands within 'h mile. points= 0 H 2. TOT AL Score -opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores from H2.1,H2.2, H2.3, H2.4 TOT AL for H 1 from page 14 Total Score for Habitat Functions -add the points for H I, H 2 and record the result on p. l Wetland Rating Farm -western Washington 17 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 3 -----I 6 I I I ----- 8 ----- 14 J Wetland name or number __ CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described below and circle the appropriate answers and Category. Wetland Type Category Check off any criteria that apply to the wetland. Circle the Category when the annropriate criteria are met. SC LO Estuarine wetlands (seep. 86) Does the wetland unit meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? -The dominant water regime is tidal, ,,. -Vegetated, and -With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. YES" Go to SC 1.1 NOX SC l. l Is the wetland unit within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, Cat. I National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? YES " Cate2orv I X NO 20 to SC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland unit at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? YES " Category I NO " Category II Cat. I -The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, Cat. II cultivation, grazing, and has less than l 0% cover of non-native plant species. If the non-native Spartina spp. are the only species that cover more than 10% of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual Dual rating (I/ID. The area of Spartina would be rated a Category II while the rating relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a 1/11 Category I. Do not, however, exclude the area of Spartina in determining the size threshold of 1 acre. -At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. -The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 18 August2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 J Wetland name or number __ SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands (seep. 87) Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland unit being rated in a Section/fownship/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? (this question is used to screen out most sites before you need to contact WNHP/DNR) Sff/R information from Appendix D _ or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site _ YES __ -contact WNHP/DNR (see p. 79) and go to SC 2.2 NOX SC 2 .2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? YES = Category I NO ---X_not a Heritage Wetland SC 3.0 Bogs (seep. 87} Does the wetland unit (or any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify if the wetland is a bog. If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. 1. Does the unit have organic soil horizons (i.e. layers of organic soil), either peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils)? Yes - ~mQ.3 X~-~mQ2 2. Does the unit have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on a lake or pond? Yes -go to Q. 3 X No -Is not a bog for purpose ofrating 3. Does the unit have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND other plants, if present, consist of the "bog" species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation (more than 30% of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)? Yes -Is a bog for purpose of rating X No -go to Q. 4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16" deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the "bog" plant species in Table 3 are present, the wetland is a bog. J. Is the unit forested (> 30% cover) with sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Englemann's spruce, or western white pine, WITI-1 any of the species (or combination of species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component nfthe ground cover (> 30% coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover)? 2. YES = Category I No..X Is not a bog for purpose of rating Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 19 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 Cat. I Cat. I J Wetland name or number __ SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands (seep. 90} Does the wetland unit have at least 1 acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wedand based on its functions. -Old-growth forests: (west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least two tree species, fonning a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/acre (20 trees/hectare) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of 32 inches (81 cm) or more. NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests. Two-hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and "OR" so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. -Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are 80 -200 years old OR have average diameters (dbh) exceeding 21 inches (53cm); crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth. Cat. I NO X not a forested wetland with special characteristics YES : Category I SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (seep. 91) Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? -The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks -The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured near the bottom) YES: Go to SC 5.1 NOX not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1 Does the wetland meets all of the following three conditions? -The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of invasive plant species (see list of invasive species on p. 7 4). -At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. -The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre (4350 square feet) YES = Category I NO = Category II Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 20 August2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 Cat. I Cat. II J Wetland name or number __ SC 6.0 Interdunal Wetlands (seep. 93} Is the wetland unit west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? YES -go to SC 6.1 NO X not an interdunal wetland for rating If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. In practical tenns that means the following geographic areas: • Long Beach Peninsula-lands west of SR 103 • Grayland-Westport-landswest of SR 105 • Ocean Shores-Copalis-lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is once acre or larger? YES= Category II X NO-go to SC 6.2 Cat. II SC 6.2 Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and 1 acre? YES = Category III Cat. III Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics . Choose the "highest" rating if wetland falls into several categories, and record on . p.1. If you answered NO for all types enter "NotAnolicable" on p.1 Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 21 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 August2004 APPENDIX F SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Photograph 2 Wetland B Facing South Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qpendall Terminal F-1 Appendix F -Site Photographs September 2009 = Photograph 3 Wetland C Facing East Photograph 4 Wetland D Facing North Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qpendall Terminal F-2 Appendix F -Site Photographs September 2009 xxxxxx g Photograph 5 Wetland E Facing South Photograph 6 Wetland F Facing South Wetland and Ordinary-High Waler Mark Delineation Report QpendaU Terminal F-3 Appendix F -Site Photographs September 2009 = Photograph 7 Wetland G Emergent Community Photograph 8 Wetland G Soil Plot Location Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Quendall Tenninal F-4 Appendix F -Site Photographs September 2009 xxxxxx Appendix F -Site Photographs Photograph 9 Wetland H Facing West Photograph 10 Wetland H Soils (not touched or keyed due to known contaminants) Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Debncation Report Quendall Tenninal F-5 September 2009 = Appendix F -Site Photographs Photograph 11 OHWM Delineation; Southern Half of Property ·.· •-:··: :--:. · .. ",,,,:,,. I Photograph 12 OHWM Delineation; Southern Half of Property Wedand and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report September 2009 Quendall Terminal F-6 Photograph 13 OHWM Delineation; Northern Half of Property -""' Photograph 14 Wetland J Facing Southeast Wetland and Ordina,y High Water Mark Delineation Repon Qµendall Terminal F-7 Appendix F -Site Photographs September 2009 xxxxxx Photograph 15 Wetland I Facing Southeast Wetland and Ordinary High Water Mark Delineation Report Qµendall Tenninal F-8 Appendix F -Site Photographs September 2009 =x APPENDIX G MITIGATION ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM, QUENDALL AND BAXTER PROPERTIES ~ ~tifP\) AESI ASSOCIATED rl M1?\\ d EARTH e um SCIENCES, INC "M,"f~ 911 Fifth Avenue, Suite 100, Kir1<1and, Washington 98003 Phone (425) 827-7701 Fax (425) 827-5424 FEB 2 3 2000 DATE: February 17, 2000 PROJECT NO.: KB99142A PROJECT NAME: Quendall/Baxter Mitigation Analysis Memorandum TO: Larry Martin, Chuck Wolfe, John Ryan, Grant Hainsworth, Ron Straka, Susan Carlson, Jennifer Henning, Bill Joyce, Catherine Petito Boyce, Elizabeth River Higgins, Jim Green, Erik Stockdale. Brian Sato, Gail Colburn, Martha Turvey, Sarah Suggs, Larry Fisher, David Bortz, Carol Cicen, Karen Walter, Glen St. Amant, Jim Hanken, and Lynn Manolopoulos FROM: Andy Kindig, Judith Light, and Carl Hadley REGARDING: Notes from the November 17, 1999 Meeting and The Final Remediation Mitigation Analysis Memorandum. The third and final meeting on the Ouendall Terminals and Baxter Remediation Mitigation Plan was held on November 17, 1999 in Renton. Handouts from that meeting were sent to your attention on November 18, 2000. Those included: 1. The agenda, 2. A Memorandum dated November 17, 1999 summarizing the comments received on the draft (October 19) Mitigation Analysis Memorandum and a brief description of how they were handled, and 3. A revised Mitigation Analysis Memorandum, dated November 17, 1999. A summary of discussion during the November 17" meeting is attached in this package. That summary was not sent earlier, so that we could include the final results of discussions with Ecology on minor changes to the November 17, 1999 Mitigation Analysis Memorandum. The final changes were minor, and have been incorporated into a final Mitigation Analysis Memorandum report dated February 17, 2000. That report is also attached. The final changes agreed with Ecology included the following 1. Any main north-south pedestrian trail connector proposed by subsequent development would be landward and outside of the buffer along Lake Washington and the two wetland mitigation areas at Baxter Cove and the southwest comer of Quendall Terminals. Access would be controlled by signage, and any combination of fencing or dense/thorny native vegetation. 2. The final Consent Decrees will provide for assurance that the mitigation described in the Mitigation Analysis Memorandum will be implemented, and that the contractor overseeing the implementation and the subsequent success monitoring will be made known in advance to Ecology. 3. Monitoring would occur five times over 10 years, not over 5 years as previously proposed. 4. Water derived from the dewatering of Baxter Cove to allow remediation would be treated as necessary and discharged to the sanitary sewer, not to Lake Washington. 5. An error in Figure 4-4 was corrected, so that the tree cover was correctly referenced as 50 percent. All of these changes were minor. Thank you very much for participating in the preparation of this mitigation plan. In combination with contamination remediation, implementation of this plan will greatly enhance the southeastern Lake Washington shoreline. ACK/Id KB99142A55 LD-0~-00 · W2K 2 Quendall/Baxter Mitigation Analysis Memorandum Third Meeting List of Attendees on November 17, 2000: Larry Fisher, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Martha Turvey, Washington Department of Ecology Gail Colburn, Washington Depamnent of Ecology Grant Hainsworth, ThermoRetec Carol Cloen, Washington Department ofNarural Resources Andy Kindig, Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Judith Light, Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Carl Hadley, Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Darlene Madenwald, Orion Group Lynn Manolopoulos, Davis Wright Tremaine Bill Joyce, City of Renton; Ogden, Murphy & Wallace Ron Straka, City of Renton Chuck Wolfe, Vulcan Northwest; Foster Pepper & Shefelman Jennifer Henning, City of Renton Meeting Notes from November 17, 2000: These notes are based on notes taken by Andy Kindig, Judith Light, and Carl Hadley. As you might expect, they reflect major topics and points, and are not intended to be a transcript of the meeting. [Light] Described the 1.5: I wetland mitigation ratio basis as consistent with City of Renton policy given the proposed enhancement; and that the elimination of vertical and bare dirt banks at the lakeshore will actually create more lake-side wetlands than are being counted for acreage at the northern and southern ends of the mitigation area. Buffer averaging was discussed as up to the subsequent development to detennine the need for; any implemented averaging would have to make biological sense given the restoration objectives of the mitigation plan. That determination would be made at the time of the final planting plan preparation, which Ecology and the Anny Corps would review through the NWP 38 permitting process. [Suggs, Colburn. Fisher] While Sarah Suggs indicated that she felt there should be no trails anywhere in the mitigation area, Larry Fisher indicated that he would prefer the main north-south trail spine be outside the mitigation area. [Light response] Public access is one part of the City's comprehensive plan for the property, and could be controlled with perpendicular extensions to the main north-south spine extending to outlooks landward of the ordinary high water mark of Lake WashingtOn. It was agreed that placement of the main north-south trail spine outside of &bT1UJ.ry I 7. 2000 ACKIIIJ -KB99142.A56 • LD-0:'i1412-fXJ. W2K ASSOC!AT'ED EAR.m SCIENCES. INC. Page I the mitigation area would be presented to those deriving development concepts for the properties. [LightJ 50 percent forest cover was being proposed to maintain and, enhance the bird habitat along the shoreline. Greater tree cover would decrease the bird habitat value. [Suggs J Can tree type/placement be specified at this time? She wants full consideration to habitat, not to creating views. [Light response] Not at this time. Specifications would be prepared for Anny Corps and Ecology review at the time of the final planting plan. [Suggs and Colburn] Enquired about placing vertical tree snags within the mitigation area. [Light response] Snags need to be buried up to at least 30 percent of their height to stay upright, and this would interfere with the capping objectives of the site, as well as potentially interfere with ground water flow. The objectives of the contaminant remediation team need to take priority, but will be consulted during preparation of the fmal planting plan to see if any snags could be safely placed. [Suggs] Requested 10 years of monitoring, rather than the 5 years proposed. Would the contractor guarantee planting success? [answer: yes for immediate success in first year]. [Madenwald] Who will get the reports, and will the Muckelshoots be involved? [Light response] We expect the mitigation reports will be distributed to anyone with an interest, but Ecology would likely be the lead to make the initial determination for a mailing list. The Muckleshoots have participated in the process since its first inception years ago, and receive all information as a listed participant. It is our understanding from Karen Walters that the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe views the remediation as a positive action, and are directing their resources in other directions at present. [Hadley] Described fisheries assessment and mitigative elements as being directed at all fish species in Lake Washington, not just sockeye. In response to questions. about the accounting method for measuring linear extent of bulkheads, clarified that initial work looked south onto the Barbee Mill where genuine bulkheads occur, but that property is not now included. The category stayed nonetheless. Bollards were separately accounted from bulkheads in the report tables, although they both have the same fisheries habitat effect. The 33 percent of area with bank protections in place included bollards, rip-rap, log skids, and other reinforcements. There are no true bulkheads on the Quendall or Barbee properties. Ftbruary 17, 2000 ASSOClATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. ACXJ/4 -A'.899142.4$6 • LJ>.D:\ldlZ.aJ-W2K Page2 [Colburn] The question is procedural. [Suggs] Her experience with other municipalities does not give her assurance. She would like bonding. [Joyce] [Colburn] Doesn't see need for bonding, but it could be discussed further. Assurance is not documented in this tnitigation report. [Wolfe and Joyce] We can consider an inclusion by reference to the Consent Decree obligations. [Suggs] What type of temporary irrigation would be used for the tnitigation plantings? Would there be a diversion from Lake Washington? City water would be the source. [Light] {Suggs] In the early 1990s, portions of the Baxter site were cleared without a permit. [Colburn] The owners were required to tnitigate at that time [City added that a permit was granted after the fact as an administrative matter]. Mitigation consisted of a silt fence, straw cover on the cleared areas, and winter wheat planting (occurred in November). [Suggs] Then the site had more habitat value than at present. Is the comparison of enhancement to how it appears now, or then? [Hadley] To how it appears now. 50 years ago it was a forested river delta. [Light] The issue is moot. Vegetation will sti!l be removed by remediation, and this mitigation proposal will replace it with greater value. [Kindig] Practically speaking, there are no data on the past 1990 action to apply a valuation 10 the alder that were removed, nor would ii change the mitigation p Ian. The site exists as we see it at present, and that condition is documented. [Wolfe] In the 1960s to 1980s it had less value while industrial activity was active. The discussion closed at that point. Ftbroary /7, 2000 ASSOClA'/ED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. ACK/kl -KB99/4W6-£.D.D:Vd12.W. W1K Page4 MITIGATION ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM OUENDALL AND BAXTER PROPERTIES RENTON,WASHINGTON COJPORATE OFFICE 911 r.lth A-, Suila 100 Kirkland, Was&inglon 98033 (425) 827-7701 FAX {425) 827-5-424 BAINBRIDGE ISlAND OFFlCE 1 79 Modrone lane North Boinb.idge lslond, WA 98110 12061 780-9370 FAX (2061 780·9438 PREPARED FOR Vulcan Northwest City of Renton PROJECT NO. KB99142A February 17, 2000 Ai SI ASSOCIATED EARTH F SCIENCES, INC PORT QUENDALL MITIGATION ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM Prepared for: Vulcan Northwest 110 110"' Avenue NE, Fifth Floor Bellevue, WA 98004 and The City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way, Sixth Floor Renton, WA 98055 Prepared by: Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. 911 Fifth Avenue, Suite 100 Kirkland, Washington 98033 February 17, 2000 Project No. KB99142A Quendall and Baxter Properties Mitigan"on Analysis Jlemorandum TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 rNTRODUCTION ......... ... . . ... .. .......... . ........................................................................... I 1. 1 Objectives ........................................................................... : ............... 1 1. 2 Disclaimer ........................................................................................... 1 2.0 DESCRJPTION OF AFFECTED RESOCRCES .................................................................. 2 2.1 Water Quality ....................................................................................... 2 2.1.1 South Lake Washington .................................................................. 2 2.1.2 Gypsy Subbasin Drainage ................................................................ 9 2.2 Plants and Animals .............................................................................. 12 2.3 Fisheries Affected Environment ............................................................... 16 2.3. I Introduction ............................................................................... 16 2.3.2 Lake Washington Biology .......................................................... 17 Pelagic Species ............................................................................. 17 Benthic Species ............................................................................. 21 2.3.3 Lake Washington Shoreline ........................................................ 21 Survey Methodology ...................................................................... 21 On-Site Habitat and Valuation ........................................................... 21 Off-Site Habitat ............................................................................ 27 2.3.4 Lake Washington Open Water ........................................................ 29 Benthic ....................................................................................... 29 Water Column .............................................................................. 30 Surface ....................................................................................... 30 2.3.5 Habitat Valuation ........................................................................ 30 2 .4 Recreational.. ..................................................................................... 31 2.5 Cultural ............................................................................................ 31 2.6 Economic .......................................................................................... 31 3 0 IMPACTS .............................................................................................................................. 32 3 .1 Plants and Animals .............................................................................. 3 2 3.1. l Disturbance to Shoreline ............................................................... 32 3.1.2 Dredge Offshore Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) ................... 32 3.1.3 In-Water One-Foot Sediment Cap .................................................... 37 3.1.4 Dredge Offshore Areas with Greater Than 50 Percent Wood Chips ........... 37 3. l.5 Upland Soil Excavation and Capping ................................................ 37 3.2 Fisheries Impacts ................................................................ , ................ 37 3.2.1 Shoreline Disturbance ................................................................. 37 3.2.2 Dredge Offshore (PAH) .............................................................. 38 3.2.3 Dredge Offshore (Wood Chips) ..................................................... 38 3.2.4 Upland Soil Excavation and Capping ................................................ 40 4.0 MITIGATION ....................................................................................................................... 41 4.1 Plants and Animals ............................................................................. 43 4.1.1 Disturbance to Quendall Shoreline and Loss of Wetland C ...................... 43 4.1.2 Excavation of Baxter Cove (Wetland E) and Loss of Wetland D ............... 49 February I 7. 20()() A.CKljhfld · KB99J4LU7 · W-D:lldl2.00 · W2K ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. !NC. Page i Quent/al/ and Baxter Properries Mitigation Analysis Memorandum TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) 4.1.3 Dredge Offshore Areas with Greater Than 50 Percent Wood Chips ........... 49 -ii.1.4 Dredge Offshore P AH Areas .......................................................... 50 4.1.5 Upland Soil and Excavation and Capping ........................................... 50 4.2 Fisheries Mitigation ............................................................................. 50 4.2.1 In-Water Work Timing ................................................................. 50 4.2.2 Shoreline Disturbance .................................................................. 51 4.2.3 Dredge Offshore (PAH and Wood Chips) .......................................... 51 4.2.4 Upland Soil Excavation and Capping ................................................ 51 4.3 Water Quality ..................................................................................... 53 4.4 Mitigation Implementation Schedule ......................................................... 53 4.4.1 Baxter Property .......................................................................... 53 4.4.2 Quendall Property ....................................................................... 53 4.5 Monitoring and Contingency ................................................................... 55 4.5. l Performance Standards ................................................................. 55 4.5.2 Maintenance .............................................................................. 56 4.5.3 Monitoring ................................................................................ 56 4.5.4 Monitoring Schedule .................................................................... 57 4.5.5 Monitoring Reporting ................................................................... 57 4.5.6 Contingency Plans ....................................................................... 58 5.0 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................... 59 Figure 2-1. Figure 2-2. Figure 2-3. Figure 2-4. Figure 2-5. Figure 2-6. .figure 2-7. Figure 3-1. Figure 3-2. Figure 3-3. Figure 4-1. Figure 4-2. Figure 4-3. Figure 4-4. LIST OF FIGURES Metro Water Quality Sampling Stations in Lake Washington ............................... 3 Wetlands and Shoreline Vegetation ...................................................................... 13 Aerial Overview of Port Quenda!l Remediation Site ........................................... 14 1994 beach seining results at Kennydale Park ...................................................... 18 Wetlands and Shoreline Structure ......................................................................... 24 Wetlands and Shoreline Substrate and Depth ....................................................... 25 Lake Washington Shoreline Composition along a 14-Mile Reach of Lakeshore on Both Sides of Quenda!I and Baxter in September 1995 .............................................................. 28 Wetlands and Shoreline Vegetation with Remediation Overlay .......................... 34 Wetlands and Shoreline Structure with Remediation Overlay ............................. 35 Wetlands and Shoreline Substrate and Depth with Remediation Overlay ........... 36 Conceptual Shoreline and Wetland Mitigation Plan ............................................. 42 Shoreline Enhancement Concept ( shrub-dominated cross-section) ..................... 46 Shoreline Enhancement Concept (tree-dominated cross-section) ........................ 47 Conceptual Wetland Design for Lake Washington Shoreline .............................. 48 Febl'Ullry 17, 2000 ASSOCIATED EAR11l SCIENCES, TNC. ACK/jhlld · ICB99/.4W1-W-D:\Jdl2-00-W2K Page ii Table 2-1. Table 2-2. Table 2-3. Table 2-4. Table 2-5. Table 2-6. Table 2-7. Table 2-8. Table 2-9. Table 2-10. Table 2-11. Table 3-1. Table 3-2. Table 3-3. Table 4-1. Table 4-2. Table 4-3. Quendall and Baxter Properties Mirigation Analysis Memorandum LIST OF TABLES Nearshore Lake Washington Total Metals Concentrations for a Water Sample Collected South of the Gypsy Subbasin Culvert Outfall on the Baxter Parcel... ......................................... 4 Lake Washington Surface Water Quality near the Port Quendall Property ........................................................................................... 5 Lake Washington Water Quality Data Collected near the May Creek Mouth .................................................................................... 6 Water Quality Measured in the Lower Gypsy Subbasin Drainage Outfall to Lake Washington ................................................................. I 0 Results of Metals Screen for Lower Gypsy Sub basin Drainage at the Culvert Outlet to Lake Washington ............................................. 11 Wetlands to be Dredged or Filled by the Port Quendall Remediation Actions ..................................................................... 15 Fish Species in Lake Washington ......................................................................... 19 Benthic Biota Present in Lake Washington .......................................................... 22 Lake Washington shoreline characteristics for the Quendall and Baxter Properties ............................................................................ 26 Comparison of Shoreline Conditions within the Remediation Area and the Surrounding Shoreline .............................................. 27 Comparison of Overwater Pier Coverage within the Remediation Area (l 997) and the Surrounding Shoreline ( 1989) ....................... 28 Shoreline Vegetation Disturbance Resulting from Upland Excavation and/or Capping ...................................................................... 32 Impacts to Wetlands to be Dredged or Filled by the Quendall and Baxter Remediation Actions (Refer to Figure 3-1) ..... . ............ 33 Valuation of Physical Shoreline Characteristics as Fish Habitat and Mitigated Condition Following Remediation (3,130 feet surveyed April 11, 1997) ................................................................... 39 Plant Species Proposed for Planting within the Wetland and Shoreline Buffers ............................................................................. 45 Mitigated Lake Washington Shoreline Characteristics (3, l 30 ft. surveyed April 11 l 997) ........................................................................ 52 Mitigation of Short-Term Impacts Related to Site Cleanup ................................ 54 ASSOCIATED EARW SClENCES, /NC. Page iii February 17, 2000 ACKJjh/fd. KB99142AJ7 · W-D:lldlZ-00 W2f. Quendall and Baxter Properhes Mitigation AtU2lysis i\1emoram:iu.m 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Objectives Mitigation analysis has been prepared for remediation of the Quendall Terminals (Quendali) and Baxter sites under Prospective Purchases Consent Decrees as provided for under the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA). The remediation areas include the Quendall and Baxter properties, as well as areas offshore of the Quendall property. The Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) is a landowner offshore of the Quendall and Baxter properties. Use authorization will be obtained from DNR prior to remediation activities on its property. Under a Consent Decree in conformance with MTCA (RCW 70.105D), remediation actions are exempt from procedural requirements of permits under RCW Chapters 70.94 [Air]. 70.95 [Solid Waste], 70.105 [Hazardous Waste], 75.20 [Hydraulic Permit], 90.48 [Water Quality]. and 90.58 [Shorelands], and the procedural requirements of any laws requiring or authorizing local government permits or approvals for the remedial action (RCW 70.105D.090). For the mitigation action, this would include such procedural requirements as Hydraulic Permit Approval (HPA), National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issuance, and City of Renton wetland mitigation requirements and shorelands permits under the Renton zoning regulations. The Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) will ensure compliance with the substantive provisions of these laws and regulations through issuance of the Consent Decrees for the Quendali and Baxter remediation projects, and will make the final decision regarding which substantive provisions are applicable. The substantive requirements will be incorporated into the Consent Decrees as Ecology deems appropriate, or into other remedial action documents. The Consent Decrees would provide assurance that the mitigation proposed in this document will be performed. The Consent Decrees would also require that the mitigation installation, oversight, and monitoring contractor be identified in advance to Ecology. In this document, references to City of Renton wetland buffer requirements, buffer widths, and shoreline setbacks are made for the purpose of comparing substantive elements of the proposed remediation under MTCA with the local procedural requirements for the Quendall and Baxter properties. Resources potentially impacted by the site remediation plans are described in Section 2.0, and impacts to those resources from remediation are described in Section 3.0. Conceptual mitigation plans are provided in Section 4.0. 1.2 Disclaimer The City of Renton has an interest in the Quendall property, and Vulcan Northwest, Inc. has an interest in the Baxter property. The DNR is a landowner of record for areas offshore of both properties that would be affected by some of the proposed remediation work. The City of Renton, and Vulcan Northwest, Inc. are submitting this document with the understanding that no independent liabilities shall be assumed by any party under the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) or any comparable federal or state enviromnental laws should any party elect not to complete purchase of the subject properties; nor shall the current owners of the Quendall or Baxter project areas be in any way obligated to undertake any mitigation approach or recommendation contained herein. February 17, 20(/() ACK/jh/ld · KB99U2.U7 · lD-D:'Jd1z.l)() · W2K ASSOCEATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. Page 1 Quendail and Baxter Properties Mitigation Analysis Memorandum 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF AFFECTED RESOURCES 2.1 Water Quality Lake Washington is the largest lake in King County with a drainage area of 472 square miles and an area of 21,500 acres. The lake has a volume of 2.35 million acre-feet, a mean depth of 108 feet, and a maximum depth of 214 feet. The Lake Washington watershed is urban, and approximately 63 percent of its area was developed by 1989 {Metro 1989}. The basin is much more urbanized today. The main inflows to the lake are the Cedar River in the south end (57%} and the Sammamish River in the north end (27 % ). The Cedar River contributes 25 percent and the Sammamish River contributes 41 percent of the phosphorus load to the lake, respectively. The lake outlet is the ship canal, which flows through Portage Bay and Lake Union to Puget Sound near Shilshole. Metro has established numerous water quality monitoring stations for nutrients and conventional parameters throughout Lake Washington (Figure 2-1}. Most of the historic water quality data available for Lake Washington are from 5 nearshore stations established in Juanita Bay, Yarrow Bay, Newport, Meydenbauer Bay and Kenmore, which are all north of the remediation site. However, additional nearshore and offshore stations were added to the monitoring effort beginning in 1992, which included three near the Port Quendall remediation site. These three lake stations are located at the mouth of May Creek (stations 0839 [shallow] and 0840 [deep]), and near Renton (station 0831}. Lake Washington is listed as water quality limited for sediment under the 1972 Clean Water Act (Section 303(d) Segment No. 08-9350). Six sediment bioassay studies are cited as the basis for the listing. Three of the six bioassays were conducted on sediment collected near the Port Quendall site (Norton 1991; Norton 1992; Bennett and Cubbage 1992). Lake Washington (Waterbody Segment Number WA-08-9350) is listed as impaired for wildlife habitat as a result of industrial point source pollution. Contamination of the Quendall and Baxter properties, and cleanup standards agreed under Consent Decrees for each, are not the subject of this water quality section. Conventional water quality parameters are described, mainly from existing literature, to allow evaluation of habitat suitability following remediation. 2.1.1 South Lake Washington Beak Consultants Incorporated collected one on-site shoreline water sample on March 21, 1997 from Lake Washington approximately 200 feet south of the lower Gypsy Subbasin Drainage outfall to augment the Metro data, which lacked information on heavy metals. This sample was analyzed for metals (e.g., cadmium, copper, lead, and zinc) and hardness (Table 2-1). Cadmium and zinc exceeded the acute State water quality standards, and lead exceeded the chronic water quality standard. The exceedences were based on State standards (WAC 173-201 A) for metals at the ambient hardness of 32 mg CaCO,/L. February 17, 2000 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. ACKl}h!/d -KB9914W7-W-D:\td\2-00-W2K Page 2 t f I LEGEND Lake Union l053§: Seattle 4903 · Historic water quality stations Shallow station Deep station ;~\I):.·\ \;'{ .;:· ! ' \ l, ' Lake Washington '----May Creek A NORTrl NO SCALE ============================== METRO WATER QUALITY SAMPLING STATIONS IN LAKE WASHINGTON QUENDALL AND BAXTER PROPERTIES REMEDIATION MITIGATION PROJECT RENTON. WASHINGTON FIGURE2·1 DATe 9/24/99 PROJ. NO. KB99142A Quendnll and Baxter Properties Mitigation Analysis Memorandum Table 2-1. Nearshore Lake Washington Total Metals Concentrations for a Water Sample Collected South of the Gypsy Subbasin Culvert Outfall on the Baxter Parcel. Lake Class Criteria •. Metal Result (mg/L) (WAC 173-201A) Standard Met? mg/L Cadmium: 0.0010 Acute 0.0009 NO Chronic 0.0004 NO Copper: 0.002 Acute 0.0052 YES Chronic 0.0038 YES Lead: 0.001 Acute 0.0132 YES Chronic 0.0005 NO Zin<:: 0.054 .. Acute 0.0397 NO Chronic 0.0360 NO Water sample collected from Baxter parcel shorehne by Beak Consultants on March 21, 1997. Metals standards shown for hardness of 32 mg/L as CaC03 in the sample. Metro has monitored two Lake Washington stations near the mouth of May Creek and an offshore station near Kennydale Park in Renton (Table 2-2). The sampling frequency varied, but was from approximately 1992 to the present, with samples collected bimonthly. Parameters monitored were temperature, D. 0., pH, conductivity, transparency, turbidity, alkalinity, nitrate+nitrite-nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen, total nitrogen, orthophosphate, total phosphate, chlorophyll-a, phaeophytin, fecal coliform, and enterococcus. The lake water quality near the Quendall and Baxter sites can be described as moderate for a rnesotrophic urban lake. The remediation actions are expected to improve sediment quality and decrease risk of exposure of aquatic organisms to contaminants originating on the two sites. Water quality for the whole lake is rated by Metro as good, except for algal blooms in periods of warm weather. Average transparency for the south lake stations was 3.8 m. Fecal coliforms were high at the May Creek nearshore station (average of 128 MPN), as was chlorophyll-a (9.6 mg/m3 in 1996). Nutrients were low at the Kennydale Park and May Creek lake stations, with the average nitrate + nitrate nitrogen value less than 0.25 mg/Land the average orthophosphate was less than 0.010 mg/L. Transparency, total phosphorus, and chlorophyll-a trends for METRO station 0839 during water years 1992 through 1994 indicate decreased transparency, slightly increased phosphorus, and slightly decreased chlorophyll-a (Table 2-3). Chlorophyll-a peaked annually from 1992 through 1994 in April or May offshore of May Creek, which may be reflective of nutrient loading from the February 17, 2000 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, [NC. ACK/jhlld · K89914'2A57-Ll).D:\ldlUXJ -W2K Page 4 Quendall and Baxter Properties Mitigarion Analysis Memorandum creek coincident with increased sunlight in the spring. Table 2-2. Lake Washington Surface Water Quality near the Port Quendall Property. 1992-13.6& 10.43 7.86 1996 / 0831 1992-15.55 11.11 7.83 1996 / 0839 1995 / 14.24 11.34 8.29 0840 1996/ 13.72 10.23 7.79 0840 1997• / 12.44 9.40 7.54 0840 96 4.2 1.2 36.4 97 97 97 94 4.4 3.5 3.2 3.7 1.3 0.9 1.4 0.6 36.0 38.0 36.0 38.1 Entero. Ml'N 10 54 10 19 :/tlf~ }f'i~f~iiii J::Z~ ·0;~~ •• t 2J1,_7°ta1 f ;.(~ ;~;~ii1i ~t~;;,~jlill .c{;~_ ,;i:, ,.,,, (iri.!};); ~p.,, ,,., ,-,,~·_N ,· ·.,(mglL).. s· ,:, (mg/L}·: 'Wl r:·,,:;,mgl'm§r,1\ -~'mg/iii;··,:, ::·~~Iii ' ~~~t ' ,, -_, ,Ji.'''~i£'Y (111g1LJ ·~a-.•!;•?1~t:,.~'1':" ",~·<t~ ~'/''~tt;~'t?t4' i:lf:,;c:>sc: ·:· -;."i_ooiiiLif 1992-0. IS7 0.022 0.296 0.009 0.022 4.4 1.5 25 1996 / 083 l 1992-0.117 0.029 0.31 0.008 0.017 4.2 3.4 128 1996 / 0839 1995 I 0.190 nm 0.32 0.006 0.020 9.6 1.0 2 0840 1996 / 0.181 0.031 0.324 0.007 0.020 nm nm 25 0840 1997* I 0.226 0840 Notes: 0.021 0.289 0.008 0.017 nm run Lake Washington water quality data collected near Ren1on from l992 to 1996 (M~cro station 0831) Lue Washington water quality data collected from 199'2 to l99S offshore of May Creek mouth (Source Meuo .station 0839). Lake W.asbinJton wau::r qualiry data collected near May Cr.eek mouth {Metro st.arion 0840 -Deep Lake Station). Momhl)' avc:rage of wa~r q\Wity dala collected at a depth of I meter. nm = noc monitored • 1997 data includes only October. November aIK1 December •• Field measurement 52 February 17, 21)()() ACK/jhlld • KB99142.A57 • l.D-D:\ld\2·00 • WZK ASSOCIATED EAR11f SCIENCES, /NC Page 5 Quendai/ and Baxter Properties Mitigation Analysis Memorandum Table 2-3. Lake Washington Water Quality Data Collected Near the May Creek Mouth. ,, ... · . Seccbi Dtsc-,.i'. · ,.;·!·.':; . , , . -,~ . .;:,/' . Total Phosphate (Jog/L)· . Date ' ,;:_; .... . .. -~~fi . Cblim>phyll'<i (mglm') .,,. __ .. · . ···0:r~----· -~·'.· .:~ ·,; ......... --·.· ··-, ·. ., ' .. ·, •.· . . er _ :.:rr,~: :-· .. ' ., May 1192 5.0 nm 21.0 May 18 92 3.4 O.Dl 1 1.5 May 26 92 4.6 nm nm June 01 92 6.0 0.006 l.6 June 15 92 5.7 O.C)Ol run June 22 92 5.8 0.023 run July 06 92 5.5 0.0009 2.1 July 20 92 4.4 0.010 run Aug 03 92 4.7 0.010 0.9 Aug 10 92 4.4 0.008 run ' Aug 17 92 4.1 0.017 nm Aug 24 92 4.5 0.028 nm Aug ~l 92 4.3 0.020 nm Sep 08 92 3.6 0.029 2.9 Average: 4.7 0.014 5.0 nm = not monitored Source: Metro Station 0839 (shallow) Feb=ry 17, 2()()() ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. ACK/fMd -KBr;tJJ4ZA31-W-D;lld\1-00-W2K Page 6 Quendail and Baxter Properties Mitigation Analysis MemorandJ,m Table 2-3. Lake Washington Water Quality Data Collected near the May Creek :Woutb. (Continued) . ~;<i}l:,·.· \._. . . . ' • TotalPhospbate ~h ·,€Jooropbyll-a (mglm') . . ·• . '.•. ·'r'"f( ..:_ . -. . ..•... ·: ,• . . -·--:~ ~--, Oct 05 92 5.0 0.014 2.5 Oct 20 92 4.2 0.015 am Nov 02 92 6.5 0.017 1.8 Nov 17 92 4.6 0.022 2.3 Dec 01 92 4.5 0.027 2.8 Jan 04 93 6.0 0.035 3.2 Feb 01 93 3.3 0.012 2.7 Mar 01 93 3.3 0.025 7.6 Mar 16 93 2.4 0.021 0.7 Apr 15 93 2.1 0.024 21.0 Apr 19 93 2.1 0.019 11.0 May 03 93 3.0 0.009 4.0 :-.fay 25 93 3.3 0.036 4.5 Jun 07 93 5.0 0.014 2.0 Jul 06 93 4.0 0.019 0.5 Aug 02 93 3.0 0.059 0.1 Sep07 93 4.2 0.009 0.4 Average: 3.9 0.022 4.2 am = not monitored Source: Metro Station 0839 (shallow) February 17. 2000 ASSOCIATED EAR11{ SCIENCES, INC. A.CKljhlla-KB99l42AS7-lD-D:\ld\1-00-MK Page 7 Quendall and Baxter Properties Mitigation Analysis Memorandum Table 2-3. Lake Washington Water Quality Data Collected Near the May Creek Mouth. (Continued) \:.. ~~·:· f; ·~~ • Seccbi Disc ... ... . ,,:· . (l'nmsparency)· Total Phosphate ~f .. Date ··' ;:;chlorophyll-a (mglm'} -. ~---~,, .., .. -~ ~, .. __ .. ; .. ~--"~-· /•;," '· ._. . . -, '"' (meter) . ··.~--~ . ,. . .. Oct 04 93 7.0 0.009 0.4 Nov 01 93 5.0 0.011 2.4 Dec 08 93 5.S O.D18 0.5 Jan 05 94 5.0 0.081 0.4 Feb 15 94 3.8 0.011 4.1 Mar0794 3.2 0.023 4.5 Mar 2194 2.5 0.020 6.1 Apr 04 94 2.8 0.045 18.0 Apr 18 94 3.0 0.012 7.7 May 02 94 3.8 0.020 6.3 May 23 94 2.7 0.017 6.9 Jun 06 94 3.5 0.013 7.2 Jul 05 94 4.0 O.D18 3.6 Aug 04 94 5.0 0.031 2.0 Sep 06 94 4.5 0.017 2.0 Average: 4.1 0.023 4.8 om = not monitored Source: Metro Station 0839 (shallow) February 17, 2000 A.CK/jh/14 · K/J99l42Aj7-LD-D:1ld\2-00· WV<. ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. Page 8 Queruia/1 ""'1 Baxrer Properries Mi1igation AnJJlysis Memorandum Table 2-3. Lake Washington Water Quality Data Collected Near the May Creek Mouth. (Continued) ,·' SecchilMc '' :Date·· (Transparency) Total Phosphate (Dlg/L) Chlorophyll-a (mgtm') (meter) Oct 03 94 6.0 0.011 2.5 Nov 02 94 5.0 0.027 2.4 Dec 05 95 4.0 0.028 2.3 Jan 23 95 5.5 0.027 5.0 Average: 4.8 0.028 3.7 nm = not monitored Source: Metro Station 0839 (shallow) 2.1.2 Gypsy Subbasin Drainage No historic water quality data were available for Lower Gypsy Subbasin Drainage. The Lower Gypsy subbasin flows from the east side ofI-405 through an approximately 125-foot open channel before entering a culvert in the northern area of the project site that discharges directly to Lake Washington. Lower Gypsy subbasin water discharges via tightline directly to Lake Washington and is thus classified as Class A (extraordinary) by WAC 173-201A. This drainage is distinct from Gypsy Creek, which joins May Creek at RM 1.15. Limited water quality monitoring of the Lower Gypsy subbasin occurred on March 28, 1997 by Beak Consultants, Inc. (Table 2-4). The results were consistent with an urban stream and show some influence of upstream wetlands. Waters were neutral, cool, with low dissolved oxygen, high conductivity, and high total dissolved solids relative to most regional waters. Oil and grease were below detection, fecal coliforms were moderate (41 CFU/100 mL) and hardness was moderate. Nutrients were moderately elevated: nitrate and nitrite oxygen was l. 0 mg/L and total phosphorus was .038 mg/L. All metals met the chronic toxicity standard (WAC 173-201A) adjusted for the ambient hardness (Tables 2-4 and 2-5); however, while cadmium, lead, mercury, and silver were all below detection, the detection levels for these metals were above their respective standard. Based on the limited water quality data (one sampling event), dissolved oxygen was below the Class AA standard (>9.5 mg/L). Turbidity may not meet the standard, but compliance was not determined because of lack of baseline data. It is likely that temperature would not meet the standard ( < 16°C) during the summer months due to the low elevation and the wetland component of the stream system. During some site visits, a strong sewer odor was noticed where Gypsy February 17, 2000 ASSOCIA'IED EARm SCIENCES, INC. ACXl)hlld • KB99142A5'1 · I.l)..l);lld11..00 -WlK Page 9 Quendall and Baxter Propern'es Mitigation Analysis Memorandum subbasin enters the site from the east; however, this odor was not apparent during the single monitoring event reported here. Origin of this odor is not obvious. Table 24. Water Quality Measured in the Lower Gypsy· Subbasin Drainage Outfall to Lake Washington. 10:21 9.85 7.15 O.Q28 1.0 0.5 110 5 6.3 Monitoring Date; March 28, 1997 Dlssol..,d Oxygen (m/Ll'JI,) 8.00/71.8 Tocal Pl1ospbonls (mg/L) O.Q38 Conductivity (ohms/cm') . . 180 0rtbo Phospbak (mg/L) 0.025 ..(le·_;,, , • • . ToiaJ OU & G~; TPH (mg/L) <l Feat Coliform (CFU/lOOmL) (avg. 3 reps.) 41 ,. Totat'Copper". : '.T'otal Zinc" (mg/L) · · (mg/L) Hardness (mg/L} <0.02 <0.002 <0.02 (dissolved) <0.002 (dissolved) 0.06 0.0105 (dissolved) 74 24-hour rainfall recorded at Sea-Tac was 0.10" on March 27, 1997. • See Table 2-5 for a complete listing of the metals screening analysis. Ftbruary 17, 20()() ASSOCIATED EARm SCIENCES, INC. ACKljhlllJ. • KB99I42AJ7 ~ !D·D:\ld\2-00 ~ W2K Page 10 Quendall and Ba;rter Properties Mitigation Analysis Memorandum Table 2-5. Results of Metals Screen for Lower Gypsy Subbasin Drainage at the Culvert Outlet to Lake Washington hramdK" -<~>--. .:..;_:' . . Mardi 28 Result . --::·. . Dolectloo l.hnlf ·,~ Aluminum: 0.26 0.01 Antimony <0.02 O.Q2 Arsenic. <0.03 O.oJ Boron <0.1 0.1 Barium 0.015 0.003 Beryllium <0.005 0.005 Calcium 18.0 0.1 Cadmium <0.002 0.002 Cobalt <0.003 0.003 Chromium <0.006 0.006 Copper <0.002 0.002 Iron 1.6 0.01 Mercury <0.01 0.01 POtaSSium 2.2 1.0 Lithium <0.02 0.02 Magnesium 7.2 0.1 Manganese 0.320 0.002 Molybdenum <0.01 0.01 Sodium 8.9 0.1 Nick.el <0.01 0.01 Phosphorus 0.08 0.05 Lead <0.02 0.02 Sulfur 3.3 0.1 Selenium <0.03 0.03 Silicon 1.0 0.10 Silver <0.01 O.ot Tin 0.02 0.02 Strontium 0.120 0.003 Tiwtium <0.01 0.01 Thallium <0.03 0.03 Varuu!ium <0.002 0.002 Yttrium <0.001 0.001 Zinc 0.060 0.002 Samples collected on March 28, l 997, Lower Gypsy Creek subbasin outfall at Lake Washington. Note: Total metals. All values are in mg/L EPA Method 200,7. Italics indicate resuits which exceed or may ei.ceed the WAC l 73-201A surface water standard (chronic); the ambiguity occurs when the standard is !ower than the derection limit and the result is below detection. Bold italics indicate a result wb.ich may e:a;ceed <he acute standard (silver). February 17. 2{)(){) ACK!jhlld -K8'J9J42A57-UJ.D:\Jd12.{J(} ~ W1K ASSOCIATED EAR11f SCIENCES, INC. Page 11 Quenda/1 and Baxrer Properties Mitigation Analysis Memorandum 2.2 Plants and Animals The Port Quendall and Baxter parcels are sparsely vegetated. Five wetland areas were delineated within the Quendall/Baxter remediation area (David Evans and Associates 1997, Figure 2-2). The Port Quendall parcel is currently an active log yard; vegetation on the site is primarily limited to the shoreline (Figure 2-3, Table 2-6). Two of the wetlands (Wetlands A and B) are found along the Quendall shoreline. Wetland A is a palustrine forested wetland dominated by immature red alder (A/nus rubra) and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor), with a sparse herbaceous layer of reed canarygrass (Pha/aris aruruiinacea), buttercup (Ranuncu/us repens) and yellow flag iris (Iris pseudacorus). Wetland B is a palustrine forested wetland comprised of red alder with a hardhack (Spiraea douglasil) and Pacific willow (Salix lasiandra) shrub layer. Hydrology in Wetlands A and B is controlled by the lake level. Only minor surface discharge enters these areas. Vegetation and embedded logs help stabilize the shoreline. These wetlands provide little flood control. base flow support or water quality improvement, because they lie along the shoreline and receive little surface discharge. A third wetland (Wetland C) located on the Quendall parcel is a remnant of an old industrial lagoon which currently supports a permanent open water component, emergent vegetation dominated by cattails (Typha latifolia) and a black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera) sapling shrub layer. Wetland C detains some drainage from the adjacent log yards and therefore provides some water quality function by diverting this runoff from the lake. However, no outlet was observed and the area appears to be isolated from ground water, therefore, no base flow support is provided by this wetland. The remaining vegetated shoreline along the Quendall parcel is dominated by red alder, willow and Himalayan blackberry. Industrial activities on the Baxter parcel ended in the early 1980s; a portion of the site is currently used to store bark mulch. The compacted fill soils on the Baxter parcel support sparse stands of non-native grasses and patches of sapling-and seedling-size black cottonwood and soft rush (Juncus ejJilsus). Baxter Cove (Wetland E) is found along the southern Baxter shoreline and appears to have been created by shoreline fill or fill and dredge activities. Baxter Cove supports an open water component, cattails and a shrub layer comprised of Himalayan blackberry, red alder saplings and red-osier dogwood ( Comus stolon if era) and a few willow (Salix spp.) and Pacific Madrone (Arbutus menziesil}. The second wetland area (Wetland D) on Baxter is an old industrial pond isolated from Lake Washington that is dominated by cattail, Pacific willow and red-osier dogwood. The floodwater control, base flow support and water quality functions provided by Baxter Cove and Wetland D are limited due to the small area that drains each wetland area. A narrow band of vegetation, approximately 25 feet wide, along the remaining Baxter shoreline is comprised of Scotch broom (Cytisus scoparius) (also frequently referred to as Scott's broom) and Himalayan blackberry. A short open channel section of the Gypsy Subbasin Drainage is also located on the Baxter parcel. The Baxter site was cleared in 1990. Sapling red alder and willow are present on the steep banks of the channel. However, only extremely limited habitat value is currently provided by this vegetation. February 17. 2000 ASSOCIATED EAR'I1i SCIENCES. INC. ACK/j/t/ld • KB99142.A57-W-D:lldll-00 -W2K Page 12 ~o+ ~0 ~'?-'"::,~ ,c-..,.~ .- : • , i ~ g 2i 3! ~ ~ :::) 0 !!:: ~ ffi ~ 0 ~ Q r i= I: ':'1':,'' ·~·.1 (,' ~ ~'t'f- 0 ~ '¢0-vt. ~ . -'~~- <r.,~ "'("5/ ~'<.: V - 0 WETLAND A ~I .a,& .. --... _, -. ..... .;.:~-. ;.,i "<: ~~ GYPSY SUBBASIN DRAINAGE (UNAFFECTED BY Rl:MElillATION) , .) . ,-.. · .. ~ ,# (v~t;j ..i.~. o'I' . <:)~~ /'~ -~ '"'-, ................ I I [ WETLANDS AND SHORELINE VEGETATION QUENDALLAND BAXTER PROPERTIES REMEDIATION FOOTPRINT RENTON, WASHINGTON - ;.. ~ ,. ·~-. ..:.::~- LEGEND Black.berry Shrubs Trees NOTE: ALL HABITAT, WETLAND, AND PROJECT FEATURE LOCATIONSAND QUANTITIESAREAPPROXIMATE . A NORTH 0 100 :IIO 3lO <iO APPROXIMATE SCAU: IN FEET FIGURE 2-2 DATE 9/24199 PROJ. NO. KB99142A QUENDALL AND BAXTER PROPERTIES REMEDIATION RENTON, WASHINGTON FIGURE 2-3 Quendall and Baxter Aerial View (Barbee Mill in right foreground) Ae ria l photo is believed to da te summer 1995. Quendall and Ba.xrer Propemes Mitigati on Analysis Mem orandum Table 2-6. Wetlands to be Dredged or Filled by the Port Quendall Remediation Ac ti ons ·--~ ;:.n:.._11: .<~.,,,,,. . b!7•.r -,?,~. ~~-~- i -.. ~Y·< .. • ••• ·f ,!'\l."r"';.r ~;"' .. ~~~\t .. A 0 .20 B 0 .37 C 0.17 D 0 .08 E 0.23 (Baxter Cove) PFO ,,. Pal u.sttian Forested Wetland PSS = Pal ustrian Scrub-Scrub Wetland PEM • Palu saian Emergent Wetland POW • Palusaian Open Wate r February 17, 2000 Phys ical Ch aracteristics Wetland along Lake Was hington shoreline, mi nor surface disc harge from proJect site ; so me sho reline protection provided by vegeta ti on and log s embedded nearshore: linle flood control , base flow suppon or wace r quality improvement is provided . Wetland along LaJc.e Washington shoreline. minor surface discharge from projec t site; so me shoreline protection provided by vege tatio n and logs embedded nearshore: lit1 le flood control. base flow suppon or water quality improvement is provided. The wetland resulted from e;i;cava cion in fill material; det.1U1S drainage from log yards: no outlet was observed and the area appears to be isolated from ground water . therefore no base flow suppon is provided by thi s wetland; water quality improvement provided by detention of log yard run off . Old industrial settling pond iso lated from Lake Washington; Jiule flood co ntro l o r base flow suppon is provided; no water quality improvementS provided. Cove created by fi ll along the lake shore line ; some shoreline procect ion provided by vegciation 3Jld logs embedded nearsho re ; flood control. base fl ow suppon and wa ter qua li ry improvement are limited due to the sma ll area that drains into the cove . ACK/jltlld -KB99UW7 . W -D:lld\1-<XJ • W2X Biological Condition and Ha bita t Supported PFO · immaru re red alder with a Himalayan blackberry underst ory and a sparse he rbaceous cover of ca n.ail. reed can.1rygrass. but1ercup and flag ins: hab ita t value is moderate due co adjacency to the lake; provides potenual habitat for amp hibians, passe rine birds and limH ed wa terfowl nesting -o bserved wildlife use includes Canada goose, beaver. several species of passerine birds. PFO · red alder with a hardhack and Pa cific willow shrub laye r : habitat value 1s moderate due co adjacency to the lake; provides po1entJal habitat for amphibians . passerine birds and li mited wa terfow l nesting; observe d wildlife use includes Canada goose. beaver. seve ral species of passerine birds . PSS /PEM/POW -black cononw ood sa plings, cattails and soft ru sh ; perennial open water : low habita t val ue due to low veg etat ive diversity and isola ted nature of area: observed wildlife use includes Canada goose, mallards. and green heron . PSS -small wetland within former industrial area dominated by ca1t.1il, Pacific willow an d red-osier dogwood: ove rall hab itat va lue is low: observed wild life use includes red - winged blac kbird . sni pe . PEM /POW/PSS • can.ail. Himalayan blackberry, red -os ier dogwood and red a lde r ~apling : emergent vegeuci on es tablished after l 990: habitat value is moderate due to adjacency co the lake; prov ides pote nual ha bi ta1 for amphibians. passerine birds and water fow l: observed wildl ife use inc lud es turtles (painted and sliders); beav,:r. red -win g bl ackbird, mallards. ASSOCTATED EARTH SCIENCES . INC . Page 15 Quendall aJUi 8ax1er Properfles ,Wi1iga11on .~naNsis .Wemorandum The remediation activities are being implemented with a primary intent of enhancing sediment and water quality in Lake Washington. Improving the uplands portion of the sites is also a critical component of the remediation project. This will benefit all species rearing and migrating along the project shoreline. Existing conditions for the shoreline and nearshore areas are described in the following text. 2.3.2 Lake Washington Biology Pelagic Species Lake Washington supports a variety of anadromous salmonids, including chinook ( Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), coho (0. kisutch), and sockeye salmon (0. nerka), and steelhead (0. mykiss) and cutthroat trout (0. clarki). Runs of non-anadromous kokanee (0. nerka) salmon are also present (King County, 1993). Lake Washington contains a wide variety of non-salmonid species. some of which are considered "warm water" species. These include both native and non-native species such as speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus), three-spine stickleback ( Gasterosteus aculeatus). northern squawfish (Ptychocheilus oregonensis), yellow perch (Perea flavescens), black crappie (Pomoxis nigromaculatus), largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieul), mountain whitefish (Prosopium williamsom), largescale sucker (Catostomus macrocheilus), longfin smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys), and prickly sculpin (Cottus asper) among other species (Pfeifer and Weinheimer 1992, King County 1993, Wydoski and Whitney, 1979). A more complete list of fish species potentially found near the project is provided in Table 2-7. Of particular importance to the project is the presence of chinook salmon in Lake Washington. On March 16, 1999, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) listed the Puget Sound evolutionarily significant unit of chinook salmon as a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). Adult chinook salmon migrate past the site on their way to the Cedar River each summer. Juvenile chinook pass the site on their trip back out to the Puget Sound and may spend some time rearing in the site vicinity. Beach seining surveys by the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe in Kennydale Park found chinook fry rearing nearshore from March through June (Figure 2-4). February 17, 2000 ASSOCIATED EARffi SCIENCES. /NC. ACK/jhlld-KB99l42AS7 · LD-D·\ldl2,00-W2K Page 17 Quendall and Baxter Properties Mitigation Analysis Memorandum Table 2-7. Fish Species in Lake Washington r --~ -- r -t~:ii -.:? ___ -~ -~:!:;;~,,...... ·. ---_~ -_-~ j I Petromyzonlidae Western brook lamprey Lampecra richardsoni Lampreys Pacific lamprey £n1osphenw triden1atus River lamprey Lamperro. ayresi Acipenseridae White sturgeon Acipenser transmontanus Srurgeons Oupoidae American shad Alosa sapidissirna Herrlllgs Salmonidae Mounuin whitefish Prosopium williamsoni Trouts Cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarki Rainbow trout (steelhead) Oncorhynchus mykiss Brook trout Salve/inus JontinaJis Lake trout Sal've/inus namaycush Coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta Pink salmon Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Sockeye salmon (kokanee) Oncorhynchus nerka Osmeridae Longtin smelt Spirinchus thaltichthys Smelts Cyprlnidae Carp Cyprinus carpio MiMOWS Peamouth Mylocheilus caurinus Northern squawfish Ptychoce;Jus oregoMnsis Speckled dace Rhinichtlrys osculus Redside shiner Richardsonius balleatus Tench Tmca tinca Catostomidae Largcscale sucker Catostomus macrocheilus Suckers lctalurldae Brown bullhead Icraluru.s nebulosus Catfishes Channel cacfish /ctalurus pW1Ctatu.s Gasterosteidae Threespine stickleback: Gasterosreus aculeatus Sticlclebacl< Centrarchldae Smallmouth bass Micropteru.s dolomieui Sunfishes Largemouth bass Micropterus sal.moides Black crappie Poxomis m·g,omaculatus Percidae Yellow perch Perea flavescens Perches Cottldae Coastrange sculpin Cottus aleuti.cu.s Sculpins Shorthead sculpin CotruJ con[usus Torrent sculpin Co/tu.! rhotheus Prickly sculpin Cottus asper Riffle sculpin Carrus gulosus Pacific staghom sculpin leptocottus amarus Source: Shepard and Hoeman 1979. Also of importance to the project is the population of sockeye salmon juveniles which rear in Lake Washington. These fish may utilize the shoreline and offshore habitat along the project for rearing. The majority of sockeye outmigrate from the Cedar River, although a smaller number February 17, 2()()() ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. ACK/jltlld • Kll99UW7 • LD-D:tld\2.00 · W2K Page l 9 Quendail and Baxcer Properties Mirigation AMlysis Memorandum day and one survey at night each month. Relatively high numbers of sockeye fry, chinook fry, coho fry, and yellow perch were captured (Figure 2-4). Lesser numbers of sockeye presmolt,. smallmouth bass, and squawfish were caught. Most sockeye were observed in May during the daytime surveys. A high number of yellow perch were also captured during the same survey. Fewer sockeye fry were captured in June but a higher number of chinook were netted. Again, an abundant yellow perch population was also netted. The coho population peaked in April. Bemhic Species Crayfish (Pacifasticus spp.) and freshwater shrimp (Ostracods and Mysids) are relatively abundant benthic biota in the vicinity of the project. Numerous individuals were observed in diver and video surveys within the outer harbor line. Most crayfish were associated with larger pieces of wood where many were noted protecting the entrance to dens under logs. Freshwater clams (Pelecypods) were also noted in several places on the lake bed. Other benthic species potentially found in Lake Washington, within and around the remediation bounds are listed in Table 2-8. No site specific benthic studies were completed as part of the assessment for this project. 2.3.3 Lake Washington Shoreline Survey Methodology Physical surveys of the Lake Washington shoreline along the project boundary were undertaken to characterize existing conditions affecting fish habitat. A total of 3,130 feet of shoreline was walked from the northern edge of the Baxter property to the southern edge of the Quendall parcel. A hip-chain was pulled to measure distances. Five variables (riparian vegetation, bank type, bank protection, substrate, and water depth) were assessed at roughly five-foot intervals. The dominant characteristic in each five-foot interval was noted on a spreadsheet. Substrate and water depth were measured approximately five feet from shore. Overwater structures were also noted and measured. Existing literature was reviewed to describe shoreline characteristics in the immediate vicinity of the project. This information is provided for comparison with project site conditions. On-Site Habitat and Valuation Project shoreline characteristics are shown in Figures 2-2, 2-5 and 2-6. Features within the remediation area are summarized in Table 2-9. February 17, 2000 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. ACK/jftlld-KB99J42A.57 -LD·D:lld\2--00 • W2K Page 21 Quendall and Baxter Propenies Mitigation Analysis Memorandum The existing shoreline vegetation provides little visual refuge for fish, bank stability, insect habitat, or shading, because the lack of diversity and non-native characteristics of the existing vegetation are not well suited for these purposes. The young, sparse hardwood stand currently growing along the banks do not provide any of the above functions or serve as a source of large woody debris or bank refuge beneath undercut rootballs. The majority of the bank (56%) is unsupported and consists of steep dirt banks from one to four feet high (30%), or relatively low gradient "beach" like shoreline (26%) (Figure 2-5). Manmade structures and protection features (rip-rap, log bollards, piers, buildings, log skids) cover 33 percent of the shoreline (Table 2-9). Eleven percent of the bank could not be surveyed due to heavy blackberry coverage. Four percent of the bank (110 feet) is undercut by wave action. Large logs floating or sitting on the lake bottom near the shore protect 81 percent of the shoreline. These logs not only shelter the banks from wave action, they provide excellent rearing and shelter habitat for fish and macroinvertebrates. Historically the lake shoreline was primarily low-gradient beach habitat formed as the delta of May Creek. Over time, erosion caused by industrial landfilling, riparian vegetation removal, and wave action has created oversteepened banks. Other banks are artificially protected with rip-rap and log bollards. Neither condition is conducive to habitat formation. Cull logs and stringers from the mill effectively provide many of the habitat functions and diversity normally associated with large woody debris (LWD). Various manmade structures provide some diversity and overhead cover, and may be used by juvenile salmonids (Ratte and Salo, 1985; Heiser and Finn, 1970). Inlets, or coves make up approximately 26 percent of the shoreline. Most have a few pieces of LWD floating or sitting on the bottom. These areas of meandering shoreline add diversity to the relatively straight shore elsewhere. Shallow coves filled with LWD could provide nursery areas for many species of fish and benthic organisms. Surficial substrate along the shoreline is dominated by sands (54 % ) with relatively equal proportions of mud/silt and gravel in other areas. None of the substrates are free of silts; a muddy layer underlies most areas. A large amount of woody debris including wood chips covered the substrate in several areas (Figure 2-6). Clean gravels can provide spawning habitat for sockeye as well as macroinvertebrate habitat. Finer materials anchor vegetation and are preferentially inhabited by other aquatic species. Dense wood chip coverage leads to anaerobic conditions and a relatively sterile environment. No benefit is derived from the wood chip coverage. Water depths five feet from shore are typically less than one foot (57 % ). Only 15 percent of the shoreline has a slope greater than about 3: I. These areas are usually heavily disturbed by nearshore activities and may have resulted from past filling of the lake. February 17, 2000 ASSOCIATED EARIB SCIENCES. INC. ACK/jltlld -KB991"2157 -LD-D:lld\UXJ-WZK Page 23 t l i ,<,..O~ -1-~0 ~"?-Cj ,)'~Y,, ).. a: c'i ~ 0 Ill g; ~ 1 ~ :;J 0 /,/ / / / / / / / .. // / ,/// / / ,,--\ // ,,.~/ -~\)/ O.v/ "' . / ~v· o..'if/ 01'~ :(v'<:,,/ o"/ / / ///'-- GYPSY SUBBASIN DRAINAGE "' ·' (UNAFFECTED BY REMEDIATION), t> · 01//,/L/i....... 1 x,'(-c,'/ . . ···... I ~'<-o#'/ ~ ······:,..... / .·. :::>. \)v /.,. ··-... ; , /1: ,;,,/ ~ I . .· ,/· ,. , ;;~· • / /;,/I ' .. /.,/;' ., . ". r · l·r . •;·· . ,·.·; .. ;/ /I~-(.',.:_;,/·. "~ ( I / ·/;/ '. WETLAND ( {.,.WETI,,AND' _I D . E··· .. // ,/ . (i)/l_ ... • .1/' •. :'\ ' .r ·.//: f;:. / f / ~' ~··. . J,) WET::ND ~~. .··+ ,,.:1f,.·· . '-0"?'/ .,.~ j/ . I .,!/ • , I' .,:-: .. -///, I <!l. ,'. ji/. / I i Qi :r:; ~I UJ, i 0 ~ -.... ,. _ .. WETLAND A WETLAND C 'v / ,4: .J/· y/1··· /;/ A~ /. /·.t ~~ f( .Ji {: . "' r ~ ;;/ ,,) / .• I ,}/ -<'._,..:· f• ''f . ' // >\\•.,_, ~.;_.;:-?' "":;' // : ,I e;/ ·. .. I I ' / .-• ~-· ./ ,, ,,. / /./, "":' ' -·~~~~c==::::::::::::::::::---/ . ,~:>/ -,-·<·. ./: y' , J . .t//,/ ' ./ .. ;· f l. ' WETLANDS AND SHORELINE STRUCTURE QUENOALL ANO BAXTER PROPERTIES REMEDIATION FOOTPRINT RENTON, WASHINGTON LEGEND Beach Vertical dirt Rip-rap Undercut Log bollard Logs in lake NOTE: ALL HABITAT, WETLAND, AND PROJECT FEATURE LOCATIONS ANO QUANTITIES ARE APPROXIMATE .A.. NORTH 0 100 a:o :m -0) APPROXIMATE SCALE lN FEET FIGURE 2-5 DATE 912,199 PROJ. NO. K899H2A ! ! i "o't'" ~~0 ~~s -s-f.«., >-0::: e's ~ 0 co 0::: 0 ~ 1 ffi f-. ::i 0 /' // / / ( I Cl. i i:i (I) i ffi: ~I 0 0::: ~ -:;.:.-.;:" --------~----·r I i ./ ~/ 0~\J// 'co/ roo~/ //'-~~ ./ )__ '""' / . " '<"~~// ~'<,~/ j/ ASIN DRAINAGE "r,""' . "~ GYPSY sues BY REMEDIATION) ... • (UNAFFECTED I /~ ... // // / / .// \ / . ' ' <>/ ,/ •• I -~''/ / ···..• / 17"' ( ··, .. _ /· /. / ··~ I . . . . ·,,// ., ' µ , ,.. I '/'' ,,, .• I .· ., .. ~ ~ ·· .. \;,. I . './ \) • \'.l-''.!! // •' . . ~)" {( /, "•-·. · \ ' WE""LAND ·-~--...-_-.-~ I, / / ""' ,_i D l.t WETLAND I E . ~ ... ( ~ JI ~ _,,j WETLAND "--. 8 '-I _· .. :'·. I , .·/ , !··-· _;'':· . >{:-..' ,:; ' /. /,j/ .. : '4! ·. $ /"·.f/. #i. ~ ___ ,_ ,£_;· .,. : ,: I /· !,? . l),,; / // ' . .· V ' /,, I -;,:, <· ... :' ;:'·, l_ p;i'· ; , ;,; . ;,: • // I //._If/·. ) / WETLAND / ! . C Q~// ~~ ___ .:_/ ,= . = .l'i i:{~ . .,:fT· •ff r-) . / / . ·. __ / WETLAND A ~~· ~ _,_! ,..... .,, V' " ~-/ ',' ,f I 1'fi ·· ·$ // , {~---~·~---")t!:~ -.. ~I , 1.. . r' ,/,': /}. \_· ', . ,~-' _,· ,,./.~>· "' ·/ / -. ,: <--·:/:: / ,;,;, / / )'/ I, ,,·/ / ./' ~ i .. ~----- WETLANDS AND SHORELINE SUBSTRATE AND DEPTH QUENDALLAND BAXTER PROPERTIES REME~ATIONFOOlPRINT RENTON, WASHINGTON LEGEND SUBSTRATE Mud silt Sand Gravel >50% wood chips Qff'II:! 0-1 foot 1-2 feet >2 feet NOTE ALL HABITAT, WETLAND, AND PROJECT FEATURE LOCATIONS AND QUANHTIES ARE APPROXIMATE .... ,, NORTH 0 100 2Xi 3XJ 4:0 APPROXI\.I.ATE SCALE IN FEf! FIGURE 2-6 DATE 9124!99 PROJ. NO. KB99142A Quenda/1 and Baxter Propenies MitigaJion A11L1iys1s Memorandum Table 2-9. Lake Washington shoreline characteristics for the Quendall and Baxter Properties. f ·--,-----------------------------:i lj' • • I ( I I ' ._ ~---~----·-----~,!__ ' -~ 1,_ , -I Vegetation none 800 b!ackberrv 1.425 shrubs 905 trees 770 wetland 535 Bank type/Protection beach 805 vertical dirt 930 rio-rao 415 bulkhead 0 lo~ bollard 515 >ier 55 buildin• 35 lo• skid 35 undercut 110 inlet 820 lo,s 2,550 Substrate' mud/silt 755 sand 1,685 •ravel 690 woodwasceb 500 Depth' 0-1 ft. 1,775 1-2 ft. 870 >2 ft. 485 3, 130 feet, surveyed 11 April 1997 ' Measured or sampled approximately five feet out from shoreline. 'Woodwaste = areas where chips and bark exceed 50% surface coverage. 26% 46% 29% 25% 17% 26% 30% 13% 0% 16% 2% 1% 1% 4% 26% 81 % 24% 54% 22% 16% 57% 28% 15% Anthropogenic structures are found in several areas along the shoreline. Two boat sheds (one sunken), half a dozen docks, a barge, three boats, two log skids and several other smaller structures impact approximately 5 percent of the shoreline. All of these structures overhang shallow water habitat in Lake Washington. No floating log rafts were present offshore of Baxter or Quendall the day of the survey, although aerial photographs indicate this practice was historically common. The Gypsy Subbasin Drainage enters the Baxter property via a 24-inch concrete culvert beneath the Burlington Northern railroad tracks (Entranco, 1995). The culvert is 55 feet long, has a gradient of approximately 2 percent, and is likely a barrier to upstream fish passage. Upon entering the property, the drainage is discharged to a small (approximately 10 foot diameter). quarry-span lined pond. From the pond, the drainage enters a 24-inch, 46-foot long concrete culvert beneath a din haul road before daylighting again to an open channel. The open channel is February 17, 2000 ACK!jh/ld · KB99U1A57 -~D:\ldl2.(JO. W2K ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC Page 26 2.3.4 Lake Washington Open Water Benthic Quendall a,uJ Bcuter Properties Mingallon Analvsis .'4emoraruium In general, the Quendall and Baxter offshore lake bottom drops off gently at slopes between approximately 20: l and 9: l. Small localized areas with slopes in excess of 3: l are present. After dropping relatively quickly to 15 to 20 foot depths within 250 feet from shore, the gradient flattens into a broad plateau sloping gently for another 400 to 600 feet offshore. Approximately 5 to 10 additional feet in depth are gained over this plateau. Additional topography/bathymetry information and a map is provided in the Sediment Quality Memorandum, Section 4.1 (RETEC, 1997). The vast majority of remediation activities will take place in 10 or less feet of water. although dredging near the old T-dock would occur in about 30 feet of water. The surface of the lake bottom substrate was characterized in terms of particle size and organic material (e.g., wood chips). The subsurface composition was examined via sediment-profile imaging (SP!). The surficial layer was surveyed with video by both towed and diver operated cameras, and during the SPI surveys. In general the lake bottom consists of very fine particles. Occasional sandy areas were also noted. No graveled areas were noted. A more complete description is provided in Section 4.2 (RETEC, 1997). SPI images provide a measurement of the substrate depth in which aerobic activity is occurring (RETEC, 1997). These data are useful in assessing the quality of habitat for epifauna and infauna. A thin redox potential discontinuity (RPO) is indicative of a stressed environment. Stress can occur physically (e.g., prop wash) or chemically (e.g., high biological oxygen demand or chemical contamination). RPO depths of less than 0.4 cm are indicative of an anaerobic condition. The shallowest RPO depths in the remediation area ( < 0.2 cm) were measured off the southern end of the Port Quendall parcel and were associated with areas with high wood waste (RETEC, 1997, Figure 6-2). Intermediate RPO levels (0.2 to 0.8 cm) were observed over much of the rest of the lake bottom off Port Quendall. These levels are indicative of a disturbed environment where benthic stress is present but likely varies. Both scattered wood debris and chemical contamination are likely present. The rest of the remediation area has RPO depths over 0.8 cm, which is considered to be a relatively undisturbed benthic condition in terms of overall animal-sediment interactions for nearshore environs in this portion of Lake Washington (RETEC. 1997). A complete description of the SPI process, wood and chemical contamination extents, and associated maps are provided in the Sediment Quality Memorandum, Section 6 (RETEC, 1997). Sunken logs are present throughout the remediation area with the highest densities (3 to 5 logs/acre) mapped along the Quendall shoreline. Much of the aquatic organisms observed during video surveys (e.g., crayfish, sculpin, perch) were associated with the logs. Milfoil was noted during the side-scan sonar and video surveys (RETEC, 1997). Areas of dense milfoil are mapped in Figure 2-2. Milfoil is common throughout most of the remediation area at water depths from about 4 to approximately 15 feet. Only in the dense woodwaste area at the south end of the remediation area was milfoil relatively absent. February 17, 2000 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. ACK/jhlld -KB99142A57 · l.D-D:lld\2-00 -W2K Page 29 Quendall and Baxter Properties Mitigation Analysis Memorandwn Fish habitat value of the Gypsy Sub basin Drainage within the project boundary is minimal. The two short open stretches offer some potential rearing habitat, however, shallow depths, a muddy substrate, no instream structure, and little instream cover limits the overall habitat value. With little protection from high velocities, winter stonn events likely flush many fish from the system. Summer conditions produce extremely low flows which may also limit the habitat quality. 2.4 Recreational There is one private dock and boathouse located over Lake Washington at the extreme northern boundary of the Baxter parcel. No other recreational opportunities and no public access are currently provided on the site. Recreational resources are not discussed further. 2 .5 Cultural See Larson Anthropological/Archaeological Services, 1997, for a cultural resource assessment of the Quendall and Baxter sites. as well as for recommendations for cultural monitoring based on the assessment findings. 2.6 Economic A portion of the Baxter parcel is used for storage of "beauty bark." The southern portion of the Quendall parcel is used for log sorting. Both of these uses would be curtailed by remediation. A utility right-of-way separates the Baxter and Quendall parcels, however use of this right-of-way is not affected by remediation. Economic resources are not discussed further. February 17. 2(J(J() ACK/jhlld -KB9914W1-LD-D:\ld\2..00-W2K ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. lNC. Page 31 Quendall and Baxter Propenies Mitigation Analvsis Memorandum Table 3-2. Impacts to Wetlands to be Dredged or Filled by the Quendall and Baxter Remediation Actions (Refer to Figure 3-1) I~-----,-...,.-. 't ,. '-. I ' ':...,,;) ... ~ •' ~---" l ,..;._ -: ' " A B C D E (Baxter Cove) 0.20 0.37 Q_J7 0.08 0.23 February 17, 2000 Wetland along Lake Washington shoreline. minor surface discharge from project si(e: some shoreline protection provided by ,..egetation and logs embedded nearshore: little flood control, base flow support or water quality improvement is provided. Wetland along Lake Washington shoreline. minor surface discharge from project site; some shoreline protection provided by vegetation and logs embedded nearshore; little Oood control, base flow support or water quality im rovemem is rovided. Excavation in fill material; detains drainage from log yards; no outlel was observed and the area appears to be isolated from ground water, therefore no base flow suppon is provided by this wetland; water quality improvement provid~ by detention of log ard runoff. Old industrial settling pond isolated from Lake Washington; little flood control or base flow suppon is provided~ no water quali[}' im rovements rovided. Cove created by fill along the lake shoreline; some shoreline protection provided by vegetation and logs embedded nearshore; flood control, base flow support and water qualicy improvemenl are limited due to the small area that drains into the cove. ACK!jhlld -KB9914'2AS7-LD-D:\ld\2-00 -W2K PFO -immarure red alder with a Himalayan blackberry understory and a sparse herbaceous cover of canail. reed canarygrass, buttercup. and flag iris; habit.al value is moderate due 10 adjacency to the lake: provides potential habitat for amphibians. passerine birds and limited waterfowl nesting -observed wildlife use includes Canada goose. beaver, several s ecies of asserine birds. PFO -red alder with a hardhack and Pacific willow shrub layer; habitat value is moderate due lo adjacency to the lake~ provides potential habitat for amphibians, passerine birds and limited waterfowl nesting, observed wildlife use includes Canada goose, beaver. several species of passerine birds. PSS/PEM/POW -black cononwood saplings. cattails and soft rush; perennial open water; low habitat value due to low vegetative diversity and isolated narute of area: observed wildlife use includes Canad.a goose. and mallards. PSS -small wetland within former industrial area dominated by cattail. Pacific willow and red-osier dogwood; overall habitat value is low: observed wildlife use includes red- win ed blackbird. sni . PEM/POW /PSS -cattail, Himalayan blackberry. red-osier dogwood and red alder sapling; emergenl vegetation established after 1990; habitat value is moderate due to adjacency to the lake; provides potential habicat for amphibians, passenne birds and water fowl: observed wildlife use includes turtles (painted and sliders); beaver. red-win blackbird. mallards. A ponion to be excavated and replaced with clean material; remainder to be Clpped with 3 feet of clean material. A ponion to be excavated and replaced with clean material; remainder to be capped with 3 feet of clean material. Excavated and replaced wilh clean material. A portion to be exca valed and replaced with clean material; remainder 10 be capped with 3 feet of clean ma1erial. Most to be excavated 3 to 6 feet and replaced with clean material; remainder excavated to 3 feet and replaced with clean material. Minor portion to 'iouth along shoreline may be retained. /lSSOCIAT'ED EARm SCIENCES, INC. Page 33 Ji j 11 t ,<..,O~ ~~0 ~~s V',{<, ),.. 0: I <tl ls &! ~ lli ::> 0 //\ // / /, / / / . I ' I / / ' t ,// / / / 'Li / / / / ¢/ ~\)~/ rooJ/ ;,,O~/ 0'?-~~ ~<),/ _7 / / ·' / / / _,./· / / / / ./ /~~ GYPSYSUB8A~NORAINAGE ,,}'_.~,, (UNAFFECTED/BY REM!EDIATION) ..:_~:_:::~ ~~,,,_ ----=-l_______ i ·----·--=-.==------'-. "/ ~~---.. ----->... ,_, . .. ' e.'<''/ . '--==-,.----· . r.v~-'/ ,. ------- 0~ "S:'<?-Q --·---··--·--·--·---------.....:.-.. _-,.____ -------------------- -----·------------... -f-•"""1'_ I -------~--.. h·~....,.-~ I ~ .... --~-~--. 1 /~ · .. ; ... ~/ -~ -".F -----• ---. * · ·:1 f ~--· ~fI----------·j f/ t_,"' /;;3'':' .,,/ /. ,,.,z -------==--=-=-----/~,,'· ,.' } .. :~c~,;--· IUW==---=-······· ·---?JB /i /_ '· -----------------------_tl / _..,:"..--"'·--~. / ' . t',. ~ ~ ... ::1 ~ l =-~ __ '": L ---.. ~=-:-::-:~:-~ --C •-7:_,;-_ -· · x • ,/:· , .. . • I I / / .-..,'--- ' / L / ,,c-';': I ~·: . /f/ ' ~;~_:.~,>' .,...< :-/.' ./,. ' ' WETLANDS AND SHORELINE VEGETATION QUENDALLANO BAXTER PROPERTIES REMEDIATION FOOTPRINT v,;vvy ----~- c-=::--.=J - ' -, ---, -,·m, 1 )11 i1 J 1-=1 ---·-----::::: f-'7///,--) r/////1 LEGEND Area of remediation impact along the shoreline Wood waste >50% removed with dredging Potential 1-foot sediment cap Dredge to 6' and replaced with clean material to original grade Dredge to 3' and replaced with clean materral to original grade 3' cap with clean material or cap with redevelopment Excavated to required depth to remove contaminants and replaced with clean material to capped grade Blacl<berry Shrubs Trees NOTE ALL HABITAT, VVETLAND, AND PROJECT FEATURE LOCATIONS AND QUANTITIES ARE APPROXIMATE A NORTH O '!00 ZC XO 4X APFROXJMATE SCALE Iii FEET FIGURE 3-1 DATE 9!24/99 RENTON, WASHINGTON PROJ. NO. KB99142A ----· . i l ,<,,O~ ~~0 ~~s ,:yf.Y; >-Q:: ,q: ~ ::, ~ ls ~ ~ ffi s 0 ' ,. :i I/ ~()~, o-J. (l) ~~ct. vi.fi;, ~~ , 0 I • / / GYPSY SUBBASIN DRAINAGE ~ (UNAFFECTED BY REMEDIATION);-; //L _/-r- l _,).~ (c,~'7/ ~~ ~o ()~. ,F~ !' il!.J//1 /'/ '-•/I· l' 1· ,. ///; ·~ ... , .. /,/·~/ ;;? I,/·;/. /,;,_ ,.· // . ----· ----~// -----r .Irr, -~If / ; / '/;;/0/ '/!J/;/ / / / / f/;;:-lf / 111>' /~;ii !·' _;,/J_i / ,f/ . / :;/ . , I(!,· / /'.:/ . ;// ·. /;;~/./ I. , , /·/// ,<,j1i; ,• ;;c<c l '//},},,'-. -'. ?' .,-: - ''/ , I , ; ;.._~/ -' / /// ,::',,ccc--, ,/ _.-· ' ~·:-·· ··~',· / /. ---. 1 .. ,::~-. , c :/ (;Ji ,; " ,,, ~-i; / / / / I , I ( ' ' WETLANDS AND SHORELINE STRUCTURE QUENDALLAND BAXTER PROPERTIES REMEDIATION FOOTPRINT RENTON, WASHINGTON I ! VVv\N L__.-::..J :11111111] Wfli ~""---"·· -·-..._ LEGEND Area of remediation impact along the shoreline Wood wasle >50% removed with dredging Potential 1-foot sediment cap Dredge to 6' and replaced with clean material to original grade Dredge to 3' and replaced with clean material to original grade 3' cap with clean material or cap with redevelopment Excavated to required depth to remove contaminants and replaced with clean material to capped grade Beach Vertical dirt Rip-rap Undercut Log bollard Logs In lake NOTE: ALL HABITAT, VVETLAND, AND PROJECT FEATURE LOCATIONS AND QUANTITIES ARE APPROXIMATE. A NORTH 0 100 a;c D:i 4Xi APPROXIMATE SCALI; IN FEET FIGURE 3-2 DA TE 9124199 ?ROJ NO l<RQG14?A 1l I : I ~ " ,o~ ~~0 ~'?-C'j .,,y-+-<v /// :;,.. r/ 0:: d ~ o I , co / ; ~ 0:: ~ ::, 0 /\ .- / // // /// / cl . ~ .... ~/ o0~// n._ Q:5/ O'-• tp/ '('~/ 0"v.,'<;/ oy // // , / / / / / / / / / ~-. ~~~=~-·-__:_;l-, •• --f -~~=~yl , ,~~~~~=:~,-"~~w i ;:::: --·-----------j I =--~----------I/ • /' ,· .,~ /"i •//' . '. -' i; /. ,..-, i ... /. 1 I ,....;-?Y E. ·· . •l \. /r-· t-' ,' ,;._, ,, eY.....-' !; y'' .• _'/ '· /· . ' .<, • , I / /·' -·' :.· ... ,/, ·..,.:;_;..-~ -···.. ~-2::= ---------7 / /;,:;;·::;:-t .. :~: ·-- / ~--, __ ,/,)-',- , ,. ., .. , I' ' f WETLANDS AND SHORELINE SUBSTRATE AND DEPTH QUENOALLAND BAXTER PROPERTIES REMEDIATION FOOTPRINT RENTON, WASHINGTON ~ \ _ .. --- ------l JIIBU i ! ~ ! I ; I I !I b=--=l l//'7/ l,1 ',, , /.•j - LEGEND Area of remediation impact along the shoreline Wood waste >50% removed with dredging Potential 1-foot sediment cap Dredge to 6' and replaced with clean material to original grade Dredge to 3' and replaced with clean material to original grade 3' cap wrth clean material or cap wrth redevelopment Excavated to required depth to remove contaminants and replaced with clean material to capped grade SUBSTRATE Mud silt Sand Gravel >50% wood chips DEPTH 0-1 foot 1-2 feet >2 feet NOTE. ALL HABITAT. WETLAND, AND PROJECT FEATURE LOCATIONS AND QUANTITIES ARE APPROXIMATE A NORTH u 100 m 3lJ .co APPROXIMATE SC.t<l.E 1r, =EE! FIGURE 3-3 DATE 9124199 PROJ. NO. KB99142A Queruiall arui Ba.tCer Properlles Mitiganon Analysis Memorandum 3. 1.3 In-Water One-Foot Sediment Cap If Ecology determines that less than 50 percent wood waste areas require remediation, these areas would be capped with one foot of clean sand. These areas are indicated as a "potential" one-foot cap in Figure 3-1. No impact to nearshore, partially submerged logs that provide resting platforms for waterfowl and turtles, or to other features along the shoreline and water interface, are expected due to this potential action, other than the staging areas within the impact zones shown in Figure 3- l. 3. 1.4 Dredge Offshore Areas with Greater Than 50 Percent Wood Chips No impact to plants or animals will result from the removal of material with greater than 50 percent wood chips. Although approximately 7,666 square feet of milfoil will be removed, this is considered to be a positive impact. 3.1.5 Upland Soil Excavation and Capping In addition to the removal of shoreline vegetation shown in Figures 3-1 through 3-3, all upland vegetated areas on the Quendall and Baxter parcels, including Wetlands C and D, will be eliminated with this action (Table 3-2 and Figures 3-1 through 3-3). The narrow band of existing shoreline vegetation on the Baxter site that is excluded from the shoreline impact zones in Figures 3-1 through 3-3 will be retained. The upland vegetation removal will eliminate all current wildlife use of the Quendall and Baxter parcels upland of the shoreline areas. Snipes, Canada geese, and some passerine birds have been observed using these sparsely vegetated areas. Osprey nesting in the area could be impacted by the remediation activities. However, the osprey successfully nested on the adjacent active mill site in 1997, indicating that high levels of activity and construction-level noise would not necessarily impact osprey nesting in this area. The occasional use of the osprey nest platform on the Puget Sound Energy cable station pole by bald eagles during the winter could be eliminated during remediation activities. As a result of this very limited use, remediation should not affect bald eagle foraging. The closest known bald eagle nest site is approximately l<i mile west of the site; therefore, the project will not impact nesting bald eagles. Capping over the piped section of Gypsy subbasin drainage on the Baxter site would not preclude any mitigation potential the drainage may represent co future development after remediation. Gypsy subbasin drainage is not included or needed co reasonably mitigate remediation as proposed in Section 4.0. 3.2 Fisheries Impacts 3.2.1 Shoreline Disrurbance Shoreline disrurbances affecting fish habitat include complete removal of all vegetation along 660 feet of shoreline, removal of all nearshore woody debris along 1,045 feet of shoreline, 100 percent filling of Wetlands A and B, the two wetlands adjacent to the lake, and dredging of "Baxter Cove". Onshore capping activities are not expected to impact shoreline vegetation. February 17. 2()()() ACK/jhlld · KB99U2A57 • l.D-D:\ld\2-00 -W2K ASSOCIATED EARm SCIENCES. INC Page 37 Quendall and Baxter Propem·es Min·gation Analysis Memorandum Table 3-3. Valuation of Physical Shoreline Characteristics as Fish Habitat and Mitigated Condition Following Remediation (3, 130 feet surveyed April 11, 1997). Vegetation Shrubs dominated by non-native Scotch broom and Himalayan blackberry to the exclusion of native species; small hardwoods; relatively homogeneous structure. Bank Type Beach type shoreline dominates. Anthropogenic fearures (e.g., piers. bollards. etc. ) are also common (33 percent). Eroding din along shoreline at southeast. Bank Pro~tion Approximately 33 percent anthropogenic structures; floating Jogs along 81 percent of shoreline and in shallow nearshore lake environment. Substrate Depth February 17. 2000 Dominated by fine materials including sand and silts (79 percent); graveled substrate around 12 percent of shoreline; abundant wood chips in areas ( 16 rcent). Mostly (57 percent) very shallow nearshore environment ( < l foot within 5 feet offshore). Occasional deeper areas. ACKIJW · KB99I4W7-lD-D:lk/12-00 · W1K Low growing vegetation including grasses and shrubs provide overhanging visual refuge for fish, bank stability. insect habitat (prey item). and shading; trees provide similar functions plus source of large woody debris, and overhanging banks when rootball is undercut. Historically the lake shoreline was primarily )ow-gradient beach habitat formed as the delta of May Creek; large woody debris (LWO) near beach may provide juvenile salmon refuge. Alternative shoreline types (e.g., bollards, riprap) provide some diversity and rearing habitat for juvenile salmonids. Fallen trees along the shoreline provide bank stabilization as well as quiet backwater rearing habitat for juveniles. Logs enhance primary productivity in nursery areas. Rocks and roorwads provide refuge and habitat diversi Clean gravels provide potential spawning habilat for salmonids as well as macroinvenebrate habitat; finer materials anchor vegetation and are preferentially inhabited by other aquatic species: dense wood chips provide no benefit. Juvenile salmonids prefer nearshore shallow habitat at night; deeper areas provide adult holding and refuge especially when combined with overhanging banks or other complex suucrures. Intermediate de ths for ve etation. Non-vegetated and blackberry covered shoreline would be reduced by 23 percent and 28 percem respectively; native trees planted along 50 percent of the remediated landscape; native shrubs planted along 50 percent of the remediated Jandsca All anificial structures removed from the remediation area; wetland mitigation along shoreline fronted with beach type habitat (Figure 4-4); beach habitat increased by lO percent; non-wetland graded more steeply (Fi res 4-2 and 4-3). Anthropogenic structure reduced to 22 percent; percent log coverage remains the same. Substrate returned lo original grain size and grade; wood waste eliminated in most areas. No change ui depth characteristics from existing conditions. ASSOCIATED EARIB SCIENCES. INC. Page 39 Quendall and Baxter Properties Mitigation Analysis Memorandwn Areas to be dredged of wood chips are commonly associated with highly anaerobic conditions (RETEC, 1997), thus little beneficial habitat currently exists in the dredging areas. No long-term negative impact is expected from the activity. Dredging of the wood chips is expected to have a net long-term benefit on fish habitat in the area. The areas are expected to be rapidly recolonized with benthic invertebrates and flora, and shortly thereafter with the larger species which prey on these organisms. Ecology specifications for cleanup standards should prevent sub lethal impacts to the fishery from the wood leachates and anaerobic chemical processes after remediation. 3.2.4 Upland Soil Excavation and Capping Upland soil excavation and capping activities have the potential to introduce sediment to Lake Washington. Excessive sediment introduction can result in reduction of nearshore habitat availability. Excessive fine sediments can elevate turbidity which can have a detrimental effect on fish communities. High turbidity can impact fish directly through changes in behavior and physiology, or indirectly by decreasing food supply and habitat availability. Behavioral modifications include cessation of feeding and outmigration. Physical reactions include excessive mucus secretion, excretory interference, and respiratory complications resulting in possible suffocation (Redding et al., 1987). An erosion and sediment control plan would be developed and implemented to contain all significant sediment sources, thus no significant impacts to fish resources should be expected from the upland activities. February /7, 2000 ACK/jh/lJJ-KB9914ZA57 · UJ.D:lld\2-00-W1K ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Page 40 Quendal! and Baxter Propenies Mitigation Analysis Memorandum 4.0 MITIGATION The wildlife habitat within the remediation area is primarily found along the shoreline. The goal of the wildlife mitigation is to expand and enhance the plant communities and other habitat features (e.g., down woody debris) along the Quendall and Baxter shorelines. All wetlands on the Quendall and Baxter parcels are Class 3 wetlands (per City of Renton categorization) that require replacement at a I: 1.5 (impact:restoration) ratio by the City of Renton. Wetland communities would be replaced with higher value Class 2 forested wetlands in two areas. The northern area would include the present location of Baxter Cove (Wetland E). The southern wetland mitigation site would be a large complex along the southern Quendall shoreline. Wetland hydrology would be primarily controlled by Lake Washington. Vegetation and logs would provide shoreline protection as found under current conditions. Water quality functions would be limited in these wetland systems due to the limited area that would drain into these wetlands, similar to existing wetland conditions. The biological support provided by the wetland mitigation areas is expected to be greater than currently provided by the five wetland areas (A through E) that would be impacted by the remediation because two large and enhanced wetland areas would be linked by a restored JOO-foot vegetated shoreline. The resulting habitat would also support greater vegetative diversity and structure than current conditions, including an overstory conifer component. Conceptual mitigation actions are summarized in Figure 4-1 and discussed below for each remediation action. Wetland mitigation is not proposed along intact portions of the shoreline unaffected by remediation (for example, northern Baxter) or in areas of Quendall with extensive monitoring requirements under the cleanup action plan. Shoreline enhancement and restoration has been placed where the shoreline will be impacted by the remediation (Quendall shoreline north to Baxter cove). A trail north to south with perpendicular extensions to controlled outlooks landward of the OHWM is expected with subsequent development of the site. A trail is not proposed as part of the remediation mitigation. Nonetheless, mitigation enhancement for the remediation is considered to constrain any future trail and public access as follows: l. The main north to south trail would be landward of the buffer. 2. Perpendicular trail extensions to controlled Lake Washington outlooks would be allowed to extend into the buffer, with buffer widths extended to make up the area lost to the trail. 3. All access would be controlled to within the trail and outlook system, using some combination of dense or thorny native vegetation or fencing. Signs would be posted indicating the wildlife value of the buffer, indicating ownership, and restricting access. 4. The buffer perimeter may be averaged. Febn,ary J 7, ZOOO ASSOCIATED EAR1H SCJENCES. INC. ACK/jhlld. KB99J42AJ7 -LD-D:\ldl2.00-W2K Page 41 I I I ;{ ~~ )s~ I <co 0~ '(''?-~~ I -:<..«,~ 0\) I I I I I I I LAKE WASHINGTON OUTER HARBOR BOUNDARY f('.,, 0)., "t'. ,0 '1',:s o')., ;.<-1'(' <l'v. /'"' <5'.s, ''O '1'& <S')., 'q, 1'~ o"". ~~"'?~ ~ "i'Q \ DNR OWNERSHIP "'-)00' / 'b . \ I \ :'hFT S ,+.:,P.f.U'1E E,·..,F F tH A\if.f.A:0':C IX:,.$ 1 Si-GRELJNE 8UFFER ( A\o'E..RA~Dr ~ \ i ! I f aAx-cEB I I I • ! I i auENDALL I f CONCEPTUAL SHORELINE AND WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN ~ QUENDALL AND BAXTER PROPERTIES I f REMEDIATION FOOTPRINT ~ RENTON WASHINGTON i"'I "'1>~~ 0 100 ,00 3'.XJ 4(,(, APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET FIGURE 4-1 DATE 9/24199 PROJ NO KB99142fa. Quendall aJUi Baxter Properties MitigaJion Analysis Memoranaum 4.1 Plants and Animals 4.1.1 Disrurbance to Ouendall Shoreline and Loss of Wetland C The goal of the Quendall shoreline mitigation is to replace existing vegetated shoreline areas (including Wetlands A & B) and Wetland C with similar or enhanced vegetated/habitat conditions. The following actions will be conducted to mitigate for shoreline wildlife habitat impacts: • Establishment of an averaged I 00-foot-wide zone of native plant communities along the impacted shoreline that is currently only poorly vegetated or lacking vegetation. Shrub species will be established along most of the revegetated shoreline (Figure 4- 2). Trees will be established along at least 50 percent of the shoreline and cover at least 50% of the wetland restoration areas (Figure 4-3). • Plant diversity will be increased from current conditions. A list of plants proposed for the restoration plantings are provided in Table 4-1. • Wetlands A, B, and C will be replaced with enhanced functions on a 1: 1.5 area (impact:restoration) in one wetland complex associated with Lake Washington in the current location of Wetland A, totaling approximately 1.11 acres (Figure 4-4). The length of the wetland complex along the shoreline will at least equal current shoreline wetland area (approximately 395 feet). The creation of one larger system comprised of more diverse communities (e.g., conifers) will increase wetland value. Wetland hydrology will be controlled by lake level during the summer and stormwater release from the developed project during the winter, and is thus guaranteed. • Vegetation species composition and diversity will be increased in the wetland buffer from the current condition. The wetland buffer will be expanded from 25 feet to 50 feet because the newly created wetlands associated with the lake would be classified by the City as Class 2 wetlands, rather than having the e11:isting Class 3 starus. The increase in buffer width reflects Renton's requirements for the improved wetland values. • Woody debris will be placed in all re-<::reated shoreline habitats, including replacement of logs as necessary along the shoreline. • Wetland and buffer slopes would average 4: 1 or less in most areas, although some banks may rise more steeply to provide diversity in limited areas so long as erosion risk can be avoided. • If contaminated material removal coincides with wetland placement, one or two snags could be installed where clean fill is placed. February 17, 2(1()(J ASSOCIATED EARW SCIENCES, /NC. A.CKljlrlld · KB991"2A57-l.D-D:lla\1--00 -W'lK Page 43 Quendall a,ui Baxter Properties Mitigation Analysis MemorandJ4m Table 4-1. Plant Species Proposed for Planting within the Wetland and Shoreline Buffers SCIENl1FIC NAME COMMON NAME , ., ' Shallow Emergent Wetland Care.t obnupta slough sedge Care.t stipaia saw-beaked sedge Eleocharis ova1a ovid spike-rush Juncus oxymeri.s pointed rush Sagittaria latifolia broadleaf arrowhead Scirpus microcarpus small-fruited bulrush Veronica Americana arnerican Drooklime Deep Emergent Wetland Ali,ma plamaga-aquatica water plantain Scirpus acuJus hards1em bulrush Scirpus validus softstem bulrush S<rub-Sbrub Wetland Cornus sericea red-osier dogwood lonicera involucraJe black twinberry Physocarpus capitatus Pacific ninebark f'yrus fusca western crabapple Rhamnus purshiana cascara Ribes lacustre swamp gooseberry Rosa nurkana Nucka rose Rosa pisocarpa pea-frui1 rose Rubus spectabilis salmon berry Salix lucida var. lasiandra Pacific willow Sa.fix sitchensis Sitka willow February 17, 2()()() ASSOCIATED EAR171 SCIENCES. INC. ACK/jhlld -KB99142A57 -LJ)..D:1,k/12-00 • W2K Page 44 Quendalt and Bauer Properties Mirigation Analysis Memorandum Table 4-1. Plant Species Proposed for Planting within the Wetland and Shoreline Buffers (continued). SCTENl'IFIC NAME I COMMON NAME. . ·:-· .. ..;-~~ . Forested Wetland Fraxinu.s lalifolia Oregon ash Picea sitchensis Si1ka spruce Populus 1richocarpa black cottonwood Thuja plicata western redceda.r Upland Forest (trees and shrubs) Acer circiMtum Acer macrophylium Arbutus menziesii Berberis {Malwmaf spp. Cornus !Wltallii GaulthLria sha/ion Oemleria cerasiformis Pinus conrona Populus tremulaides Pn.uws emargin.ata Pseudatsuga men.ljesii Thuja plicata Tsuga heterophylla Acer circinarum Ameianchier ainifolia Corylus cornura Rosa spp. Rubus parviflorus Salix spp. Symphoricarpos a/bus February 17. 2000 ACK/jltll,d-KB99142AJ7-lD-D:lld12-00-WZK vine maple bigteaf maple Pacific rnadrone Oregon grape Pacifc dogwood salal Indian plum shorepine qua.Jcing aspen bitter cherry Douglas-fir western redced.ar western hemlock Upland Shrub vine maple serviceberry hazelnut rose thimbleberry willow snowberry . ASSOCIATED EARm SCIENCES. INC Page 45 I I I I I I I I I I I I ~j I I NORTH-SOUTH I· TRAIL ., I (Outside Outer Edge of Buffer) I I I I I I I I l 00-Foot Averaged Shoreline Buffer Shrub plantings interspersed with grussy openings & o«11Sionul upright deciduous tree (i.e. quaking 1spen). woody debris plarement SHORELINE ENHANCEMENT CONCEPT (SHllUB-IOMINATED CllOSS SEOION) Overhang at shoreline edge ~ I with red osier dogwood dewlop shallow & deep emergent plant mmmunilies as lake lewl Hudlllltion allows FIGURE 4-2 DATE 10199 PROJ. NUMBER KB99142A s 'it1 NORTH-SOUTH TRAIL r -1 (Outside Outer Edge of Buffer) 100-Foot Averaged Shoreline Buffer Plant native specie! near the shoreline and 111111sllion to hortkulturol/non-notive species as needed to blend into the overoll site landscape pion OBSERVATION/AREA VIEWPOINT (Typical, Reached By Perpendicular Eltens ions From Main Trail) • ' ' :g .... .... ! ! Seleclively place woody debris within the near shore native species planting area ! ls to provide additional '111dlile habitat structure using both deciduous and :tii coniferous logs ranging from 4" to 36" dbh. Snags could also be installed. / Provide owrhang al shoreline edge with native willows and red osier dogwood r Develop area of emergent vegetolion (is. bulrush, arrowroot} as allowed by lake level fluctuation. O.H.W. ! :============================ SHOllELINE ENIIANCIMENT coNaP1 FIGURE 4-3 (Tllll-OOMIIIATED CROSS SKrlON) DATE 10199 PROJ. NUMBER K899142A ~ I Mn.Mo•,& ZOIIMIIXIO ,,,.., fOlfSr aanAr- Provides shade & miaodimate buffering, large woody debris and OlgOni< nutrient source (leaf liner), bank stubiity, food supply (insecls), as well os wildlife habitat (nesting, feeding). SO-Foot Averaged Buffer • · I 50% Tree Cover[ Welland WIRMIDAlfA.. emergent wgetotion, anchored LWD lo provide fish riluge habilot, shade, nutrients, etc. WCf WASHINGTON Log ac: i I "• "'"e 1ere1 1 [ Low We level J l========================================~~~===============~F~IG~U~RE~4-4~==== COIIOPTUAI. Wf1IAIII IESIGII IOll WCE WASIIIIIGTOII SIIOllEUIIE DATE 10/99 PROJ. NO. KB99142A Quendall and Bauer Propern·es Mingarion Anaiysls .\1.emorandum 4.1.2 Excavation of Baxter Cove (Wetland E) and Loss of Wetland D The following actions will restore wetland habitat in an area centered around Baxter Cove: • • • • • • • Turtles currently existing in Baxter Cove will be live-trapped and removed to nearby areas in Lake Washington containing suitable habitat. Dispersal areas will be identified in conjunction with County and WDFW wildlife biologists. When remediation has been completed and Baxter Cove has been replanted, anempts will be made to capture turtles from the dispersion areas and return a small population (6-12 individuals) to Baxter Cove. Dredged areas will be filled with clean material of a similar grain size and to elevations similar to current conditions. This will recreate a hydro logic regime that supports open water and emergent vegetation components. The area will be replaced with suitable clean fill material. The Baxter Cove wetland area will be expanded by excavating additional areas (to a total of approximately 0.46 acre) to provide a I: 1.5 forested wetland replacement for the Baxter Cove wetland (Wetland E) and Wetland D. Logs will be partially buried and/or anchored along the lake shoreline at the mouth of Baxter Cove to stabilize the shoreline and provide resting platforms for turtles and waterfowl. Logs will be floated across the open water mouth of Baxter Cove. Large down logs will be placed in the wetland perimeter. Shallow and deep emergent wetland species will be planted to establish an emergent plant community with greater diversity than is currently found in Baxter Cove: a bench to appropriate depth for shallow emergents will be constructed during regrading with clean fill after the excavation is complete. Obligate and facultative wetland tree and shrub species will be planted at the wetland perimeter. A 50-foot forested and shrub upland buffer will be planted. with a slope of 4: I or less throughout most of the buffer. Trees will comprise at least 50 percent of native canopy cover in areas where tree and shrub communities are established. An osprey nest platform will be erected in the buffer if the cable station nest platform is removed during remediation. 4.1.3 Dredge Offshore Areas with Greater Than 50 Percent Wood Chips No mitigation action required. The remediation will improve the existing condition and restore the lake bottom to its original contours. Febnmry 17. 2(X)() A.C](fjh/ld · KB991'W7-LD-O.-lldll-00-W2K ASSOCIATED EARnt SClENCES. INC Page 49 Quendatl and Baxter Propenies Miriglllion Analysis ,\,femorandum 4.1.4 Dredge Offshore PAH Areas No mitigation action required, other than replacemem to original contours with clean material of a similar grain size. 4.1.5 Upland Soil and Excavation and Capping Wildlife habitat impacts will be compensated by habitat created along the shoreline. This will include: , Replacement of Wetlands C and D on a I: 1.5 area basis in the two wetland complexes associated with the shoreline restoration (as discussed above); Enhancement of the vegetation species composition and diversity of the wetland and wetland buffer from the current condition (Table 4-1 and as discussed above); , Placement of woody debris in wetland and associated buffers. As a result of these mitigations, the following improvements would result: 1.05 acres of existing degraded Class 3 wetland replaced by 1.58 acres of replaced Class 2 forested wetland hydrologically supported by Lake Washington; • Approximately 53,500 ft1 of degraded shoreline vegetation (including wetlands and buffers replaced/enhanced by approximately 115.000 tr of shoreline vegetation and buffers; , an average JOO-foot Lake Washingt0n enhanced shoreline buffer, in excess of the Renton minimum code requirements of 50 feet (commercial) or 25 feet (residential). 4.2 Fisheries Mitigation Fish habitat mitigation for remediation impacts would take place along the shoreline and is closely integrated with wetland mitigation activities. Mitigation planning was directed towards creating a high quality nearshore rearing environment as the first priority. Physical shoreline characteristics and the final mitigated condition are shown in Table 4-2. 4.2. l In-Water Work Timing To minimize impacts to sensitive fisheries resources, the timing of work in Lake Washington and along the shoreline below the ordinary high water mark will avoid the annual migration of juvenile salmonids (see Section 3.2.2). To protect the juvenile runs from physical disturbance and short- term turbidity, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife recommends no in-water work in southern Lake Washington during the period from February l through June 15. Therefore, February 17, 2000 ASSOC/A TED EARm SCIENCES. INC. ACK/jhlld · KB9914W7. W-D:\ld\:Z-00 · W2K Page 50 Queruiali and Baxter Prupemes ,'t,fwgmivn Analysis ,\,femvrandum dredging and clean sediment replacement on the lake bonom and all work below the OHWM along the shoreline, including Baxter Cove, would be conducted between June 16 and January 31. Water quality protection measures are described in Section 4.3. Additional details required to protect species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act will be provided as necessary during the biological review process for those species. 4.2.2 Shoreline Disturbance Vegetation removal resulting from the remediation activities would be mitigated by replanting the nearshore environment as described in Section 4.1. The riparian width would vary, but would average JOO feet. A minimum of 50 percent of the remediation shoreline buffer would be planted with low growing native groundcovers and shrubs. Together with the existing shrubbery remaining outside the remediation area, the total linear distance of shrubs would include 1,490 feet of shoreline. Plants along the shore would be selected to maximize overhanging vegetation and provide bank stability. Compatible species would be planted in those areas converted to wetland from the existing conditions. A minimum of 50 percent of the remediation shoreline would be replanted with trees for a total of 1,135 feet (tree planting would be concurrent with other shrub and groundcover vegetation). Trees close to the waterline would be selected to provide similar functions to those described for the shrubs. Mitigation for loss of nearshore wetlands was described in Section 4.1. Enhanced wetland habitat along the Baxter shoreline will replace areas with relatively poor fish habitat conditions (e.g., vertical dirt banks, abandoned structures, rip-rap) with a vegetated gently sloped shoreline. Wetland replacement would result in increased low-gradient shoreline and a more diverse shoreline structure. Reductions in the extent of vertical dirt bank. rip-rap, log bollards, and several industrial structures would be accomplished (Table 4-2). 4.2.3 Dredge Offshore (PAH and Wood Chips) No direct habitat mitigation is proposed for offshore dredging undertaken to remove P AH and wood chip contamination except for re-establishing and enhancing the Baxter Cove shoreline. 4.2.4 Upland Soil Excavation and Capping Potential upland soil excavation and capping impacts would be mitigated to the greatest extent practicable with implementation of an erosion and sediment control plan. No other mitigation is proposed. February I 7, 2000 ACK/jhlfd • KB99l42A57-W-D:\fJ.\2..()(J -W2K ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC Page 51 Quendall anti Baxter Properties Mitigauon Al1ill-ysis Afrmorandu.m Table 4-2. Mitigated Lake Washington Shoreline Characteristics (3,130 ft. surveyed April 11, 1997) I . a l'.listbJ& --. -~-,Coad.., ..... c...-Jllllipled . " ·_", .. _ .. Millpltit·e ., Coadltioa ~ .. -· ,. Cbanderilll< ' _._..,.. c ......... ~, G<lol • ··Mlllpted•. ~ l,-; · 1 .::.:."!: ''...; Uiiar' lJnur Goo[~ . ·Clwt&e . c......., Chanae -~a, ... , c....iaii,ai . . ·;;,~~ ~ ('I') -('I') ('I') 'lllllaaco' Cannce ·• &om ' ",--1,-,.,,..-,:i ... • (ll) (ft) ' <Ill /'I'} R......u.bd " . ~ ... ~ Vegetation none 800 26% 14o() 47% +83'% 75 2% -95% blackberry 1425 46% 1000 32% -JO% 540 17% -46% shrubs 905 29% 670 21% -26% + 1490 48% +122% trees 770 2.5% 425 14% -45% + 1135 36% +167% wetland 535 17% 255 8% -52% =I+ 1070 34% +]20% Bank type I beach 805 26% 485 15% -40% + ll20 36% + 131 % Prot£Ction vertical di.rt 930 30% 750 24% ·19% 660 11% -12% riprap 415 13% 335 11% ·19% 335 11% +0% bulkhead 0 0% 0 0% +0% -0 0% +0% log bollard 515 16% 435 14% ·16% 285 9% -34% pier 55 2% 35 1% -)6% 35 1% +0% building 15 1% 35 1% +0% 35 I% +0% log skid 15 1% 20 1% -43% 0 0% -100% undercut 110 4% 110 4% +0% =I-80 1% -27% inlet 820 26% 690 22% -16% =I+ 820 26% +19% logs 2550 81% 1505 48% 41% + 2550 81% +69% Substratc 2 mud/silt 755 24% 315 10% ·51% =/-325 10% +0% sand 1685 54% 1080 35% -36% =f-1080 35% +0% gravel 690 22% 1725 55% +150% =I+ 1725 55% +0% wood waste3 500 16% 0 0% -100% 0 0% +0% Dep<h' 0-1' 1775 57% 1775 51,:, +0% =I+ 1775 57% +0% 1-2· 870 28% 870 28% +0% :::I+ 870 28% +0% >2' 485 15% 485 15% +0% =I-485 15% +0% 1 BanJc cype assumes capping does not .affect ex.istin,g bank, 1 Measured or sampled a.pproitimarely five feet ou1 from shoreline; 1 Woodwaste = areas when: chips and buk. exceed SO% surface coverage. Rcmcdiatcd cotviition assumes lake bed capped to original elevation with material sized similar 10 existing conditions. Clmt,p -~ -91% -,;2"' +65% +.t7% +l00% +39% -29% -19% +0% -45% -36% +0% -100% -27% +0% +0% -,1% -36% +150% -100% +0% +0% +0% Mitigated conditi<m assumes 50% of dredged sborcline would be replanted with trees, 50% with shrubs • .iOO wedand areas would be recreated as beach. February / 7, 2000 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. ,KK/jhlld -KB99142A57 • l..D-0:\ld\l-00 -W2K Page 52 Quendnll and Bauer Properties Jfitigmion Anniysis .\,femorandum 4.3 Water Quality Water quality impacts will not accrue from the proposed remediation and mitigation in the long term. These combined actions are expected to improve water quality over the existing condition. However, impacts in the short-term from implementation of the remediation action could occur if proper temporary erosion and sediment control (TESC) measures are not taken. A synopsis of likely TESC measures that would be proposed as part of the Consent Decree under the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) is provided in Table 4-3. 4.4 Mitigation Implementation Schedule 4 .4. I Baxter Property Based on the current projected schedule, the remediation activities could start on the Baxter property sometime in the fourth quarter of 2000. Upland excavation activities, including soil treatment, are projected to be completed within an 80-day period. Baxter Cove remediation activities are estimated to take approximately one month. Capping activities on the Baxter site should be completed within a 90-day period. Under a start date of the fourth quarter of 2000, the Baxter Cove excavation and fill activities would need to be completed prior to January 31, 2001 to accommodate the recommended fisheries window for in-water work of June 16th to January 31". This would allow for completion of remediation activities on the Baxter site to be completed by the first quarter of 2001. The wetland restoration/ mitigation activities in Baxter Cove would begin with the excavation of the areas adjacent to Baxter Cove that would be converted to wetland habitat. This excavation would at least include over-excavation of the planned grade for topsoil placement or whatever depth may be necessary to acconunodate remediation excavation. Backfill of Baxter Cover and the adjacent wetland expansion area would include a least 12 inches of topsoils. If remediation is initiated in the last quarter of 2000, the wetland mitigation area and shoreline areas disrurbed by remediation activities on the Baxter parcel would be planted in the spring of 2001. If the remediation is conducted under an alternative schedule the area should be planted late fall, winter, or early spring, if possible. Temporary watering of the plantings would be conducted as necessary to establish the plants. Long-term watering would not be required for these plantings. 4.4. 2 Ouendall Property Remediation activities on the Quendall property would likely begin after June 16, 2000. Remediation of the Quendall site involves much more extensive in-water dredging than the Baxter site, where in-water dredging is limited to Baxter Cove. Upland excavation activities are also more extensive on the Quendall site than the Baxter site. The materials dredged from Lake Washington would be transported to the upland areas of the Quendall property to be treated on-site or off-site. These materials would likely be brought onto the site just south of Wetland A. February 17. 2000 ASSOCIATED EARm SCIENCES. INC. ACK/jh!!d -KB99J,ZA57 · W-D:\Jd\2--00 · WZK Page 53 Quendall and Baxter Propenies Mitigation Analysis Jfemorandum Table 4-3. Mitigation of Short-Term Impacts Related to Site Cleanup ClfJamp Adfffty Pmsihle Miligallon Approach Genera.I Site Conuols Where possible a vegetative buffer will he left between upland activities and the lake. (n all places. silt fencing will be installed to prevent sediment frorn entering the lake. In addition. the site will be graded, as necessary. to prevent stormwa1er discharge to the lake (Chapter 173-201A WAC establish water quaJity criteria). Measures recommended in the 1999 draft Volume II SlOrmwater Management in Wa.shjngtan St.ate will be considered representative of "typical .. best management pr.:1.ctices (BMPs) for much of the uni and silC work. Excavation and ~watering Excavations will be dewa1ered, as necessary, to prevent handling of saturated soil e,;.cavated from below the water table. Water will be treated and preferentially discharged to the local sanitary sewer with prior permission. l flake discharge is necessary, specific testing regimes and criteria for lake discharge would be agreed with the Washington Sr.ace Department of Ecology (Ecology). Surge capacity will be provided by the use of rented storage tanks. fa.cavated soil will be stockpiled and provided with appropriate erosion and sedimentation controls. Dredging -Baxter Cove Ba.x1er Cove will be hydraulically isolated from the lake using steel sheet piles or similar. Free water will be pumped off for discharge to the sanitary sewer. Excavation will be ~rformed using !and-base(] ..... uioment. Dredging -QuendaJI Silt cunains or screens will be used to control the spread of turbidity from dredging. Turbidity criteria under WAC Ji3-201A-030 can be mcxiified to allow a temporary mi;,;ing zone during dredging of!ake bouom scdimenl!i, however the point of compliance would not be further than 150 feet from the dredging ac[iviry pursuant to WAC l 7'.l-201A·l l0('.l)(d). Dredging will be performed using spo::ialized c:qu1pmem (e.g., CableAnnn.1), techniques, and dredge rates that limit the potential for generating turbidity and that do not cause exceedances of surface wa1er quality criteria outside the work area. Most chemicals present on-site will be strongly associated with sediment particles. Surface water quality monitoring will be performed during drcdging to ensure no impacts are occurring beyond the work area. This plan would be devel""ed as a nan of U.S. Armv Corns of En1i!'ineers (COE) oerminin~. Sedlment Transport and Haul barges for mechanically dredged sediment would be welded water tight to prevent discharge of free Offloading -Mechanical water back into the lake. Offloading will occur by placing the haul barge as near to shore as possible. (Spillage Preventio!:, Offloading will occur with a clamshell or similar A spill apron barge may be used under the crane swinu area to collect anv incidental snilla"'e. Sediment Trarupon and Any sediment dredged hydraulically wilt be pumped directly to the upland ponions of the site using a Offloading -Hydraulic pipeline. ('-'"'illaoe Prevention) Sediment Staging and Dredged sediment will be contained in barges or upland dewatering cells or ponds. Free warer will be Dewatering collected and treated prior to discharge to the sanila.I)' sewer. Oewatering from hydraulic dredging would require discharge to Lake Washington after trea1ment due to the large volumes it would generate. Upland cells or ponds will be lined. will have a water collection system, and will be constructed with berms to nrevent run-on or run-off. Off-Site or On-Site Hauling Entry poirus to the site will be upgraded with crushed rock or quarry spalls. All trucks leaving the site will proceed through a wheel wash and any soil tracked 0010 public roads will be addressed through occasional stree1 washin17 • Process waste water could be controlled and kl!ll I semi.rate from storm water. Soil Capping A clean soil cap will be placed over large portions of the site. The soil will consist of imponed clean or treated soil. As for general site activities. a vegetative buffer will be left between [he sml cap and shoreline to the maximum extent practicable Other erosion and sedimentation controls, noted at:,ove under ll'COeral site controls. will remam in nlace until redevelc1nment activities commence. Water Treatment Any water collected from soil or sediment dewatering will be treata:l using some combinauon of equalizacion. free-phase hydrocarbon separation, coagulationlfloaulation (for example. polymer creacment). or filtration. Discharge water would conform to sundards required by ilS receiving localion If discharged to Lake Washingt0n. Chapter l73-201A WAC would apply. tr discharged w the samrary sewer, Kini!'. CountvfMetro standards would an.,lv. Permiuing Treated dewatering water and stormwater discharge will be pennitted under a Consent Degree in conformance with MTCA (Chapter70-1050 WAC). Under RCW 90.-1-8.039, remediation actions do not require a separate National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Sys1em (NPDES) construction-phase penni1; however. there must be compliance with substantive requirements of an NPDES permit. A detailed Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be developed prior to implementation of the final cleanua olan. February 17, 2000 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. ACX/jhlld -Kl99/42.,U7-W.D:1/d!l.(X)-WZK Page 54 Queruiali anLi Ba<Ier Properties Jfrngaiwn AMJvm .\1emoranLium If all of the remediation activities on the Quendall site are completed within a single fish window opening (June 16, 2000 to January 31, 2001), the wetland mitigation and shoreline plantings could be conducted in the second quarter of 2001 (assuming a June 16, 2000 start date). If the remediation dredging activities cannot be completed within a single fish window period, the dredging activities would be halted from February l" through June 15~ and be completed in the following fish window opening. Wetland mitigation could not be completed until the dredging activities are completed since the materials would be brought onto the site in the proposed wetland mitigation area (southern Quendall shoreline). If the remediation activities in the northern portion of Quendall are completed in the first season, the shoreline mitigation plantings, north of lhe wetland mitigation area, could be implemented in the first or early second quarter of 2001, and the wetland mitigation implemented after the dredging is completed the second year (project first / second quarter of 2002. If not, all wetland and shoreline mitigation activities would be initiated when all remediation activities are completed. Again, plantings would be irrigated on a temporary basis as needed to successfully establish the plants. 4.5 Monitoring and Contingency This section outlines post-construction performance standards, a monitoring schedule, maintenance requirements, and contingencies for the proposed buffer and wetland enhancement project. As proposed, monitoring to docwnent plant survival would occur five times over a 10-year period. Each monitoring survey would be conducted by a qualified biologist. 4.5.1 Performance Standards The success of the remediation mitigation effort would be based on the following standards: • Survival of 90 percent of the tree and shrub species plantings and 10 to 15 percent cover for emergent wetland plantings after one growing season. Percent survivorship would be calculated through a direct count of all dead rooted and severely stressed stock plantings within permanent sample plots. If necessary. the reason for the failure of plantings would be determined (i.e .• soil conditions, herbivory, moisture conditions, etc.). and recommendations to rectify the problem(s) provided. • Survival of 80 percent of the tree and shrub plantings and 30 percent cover of emergent wetland plantings after two growing seasons within the representative permanent sample plots. Fifteen percent cover for the tree and shrub plantings and 60 percent cover of emergent wetland plantings within the representative sample plots after three growing seasons. February 17, 2000 ACK/jhlld -KB99UZA57-lD-D:\ld\2..(J() -WlK ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. Page 55 Quendall and Baxter Propenies Mitiga1ion Analysis .'.femorandurn • Thirty to 40 percent cover for the tree and shrub plantings and 75 percent cover of emergent wetland plantings within the representative sample plots after five growing seasons. • Forry to 55 percent cover for the tree and shrub plantings and 75 percent cover of emergent wetland plantings within the representative sample plots after 7 and 10 years. • For all years less than or equal to 5 percent cover of non-native, invasive herbaceous species. 4.5.2 Maintenance A goal of this plan is to establish communities of native plant species that require little planned scheduled maintenance to become established, and require no routine maintenance after the plants have become successfully established. The planting contractor would be responsible for maintaining all plantings for a one-year period after installation before the final project acceptance is issued to the contractor. A temporary irrigation system would be used as needed during plant establishment. No permanent irrigation system would be required once the plants have successfully become established. 4.5.3 Monitoring During the first monitoring survey, randomly selected 5-meter radius plots would be permanently established within the restored habitats to provide a representative sampling of the tree and shrub plantings. One-meter square plots would be established to monitor the emergent wetland plantings. The entire area would be visuaJly inspected at the time of sample plot establishment to ensure that the plots are representative of site conditions. Information on survivorship and percent cover would be collected from inside the permanent sample plots to judge the success of the restoration plantings. Information collected during each monitoring survey would not be of sufficient quantity or complexity to provide a statistical analysis for the project. However, it would be sufficient to adequately assess the success of the restoration efforts. Photo documentation stations would be permanently established either at the center of the permanent sampling plots, or at other locations that provide representative views of the mitigation areas. Photographs taken at these photo stations would be used to document the establishment of planted materials and to illustrate plant community changes within the restored areas. Percent survivorship for the project would be calculated through a direct count of all dead and severely stressed plantings within the permanent sample plots. Plant vigor would be evaluated using the following categories: live; stressed; tip die-back; and dead. Live plants would be judged to be those with healthy, vigorous stems, and adequate succulent foliage. Plants having sparse or desiccated foliage, significantly damaged twigs, sunburn or sunscald, etc. would be assigned to the stressed category. Plants suffering from significant stem mortality, especially the leader and/or February 17, 2000 ASSOC/A TED EA11T1l SCIENCES. INC. ACK/jh/ld -KB99142A.57 -l..D-D:lld124XJ -WZK Page 56 Quetuiali and Ba:ner Properties Jfi1iga1ion Analysis Memorandum main stem, would be placed within the tip die-back category. Plants found to support no foliage or live sterns would be assigned to the dead category. Severely stressed plants and plants with tip die-back and no healthy basal sprouts or side branches would be considered dead for that monitoring period. During the first year following restoration, monitoring would occur during early spring before lake water levels rise and late summer before lake water levels are lowered. The focus of the initial spring monitoring survey would be to assess the suitability of the planting location selected for a particular plant species in relation to the lake water levels during the early growing season. Additionally, general observations of wildlife use of the enhanced habitat would also be noted. Photographs would be taken at each of the permanent photo stations during each monitoring survey, and current photographs from these photo stations would be included in the report prepared for that particular monitoring survey. 4. 5. 4 Monitoring Schedule All monitoring surveys would be conducted by a qualified biologist. Monitoring and reporting would be conducted over a IO-year period as follows: I) Immediately after plant installation to provide an as-built plan. The as-built review would include the establislunent of the plloto stations and documentation of the distribution of plant materials. 2) Early spring (i.e., March, April) and late summer (e.g., September) of the first growing season. 3) Late summer of the second growing season. 4) Late summer of the fifth growing season. 5) Late summer of the seventh growing season. 6) Late summer of the tenth growing season. 4.5.5 Monitoring Reporting The as-built report for the restored habitats would be submitted to the reviewing agency when completed, and all subsequent written reports would be submitted to the reviewing agency no later than October 15°' of the monitoring year for review and approval. The written reports would include: • Condition of plants. including survivorship, percent cover, healtll, and vigor . Rationale for poor condition of plants, if present, would be determined and recommendations to rectify these conditions would be provided in the report. A Febnuuy 17, 2()()() ASSOCIATED EARIB SCIENCES. INC. Page 57 ACX/jhlld · Kll99l"2AS1-l..D-D:\ld\2.(}() · W2K Quenda/1 and Baxter Properties Mitigarion Analysis Merrwrandllm discussion of the natural establishment of species not included in the planting plants (desirable and weedy species) would also be provided. Observations of wildlife use. • Photo documentation from the permanently established photo stations. • Overall condition of the restored habitats and nearshore habitat, including indications of erosion, human disrurbance, etc. 4.5.6 Contingency Plans Appropriate contingency plans would be developed as necessary to correct problems identified during the monitoring (i.e., planting failures, shoreline erosion, etc.). If plant survivorship does not meet the established criteria, replanting would be conducted only after the reason for failure has been identified (e.g., poor planting stock, incorrect moisture regime, herbivory, disease, shade/sun conditions, hydro logic conditions, vandalism, plant competition, etc.). Any replanting effort required would occur between October 15"' and March 15"', or the following spring. All contingency plans would be submitted to the reviewing agencies for their approval prior to implementation. Therefore, timing of implementation would be dependent upon agency staff availability and scheduling. A report would also be submitted to the reviewing agencies following the implementation of any contingency plans. February 17, 2000 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. ACK!jh/ld · KB99142A57 · LD-0:\ld12-00 • W2K Page 58 Que,ulnl/ and Ba;i;rer Propemes Mingarion .4nalyszs Memorwulum 5.0 REFERENCES Bennett, J. and Cubbage, J. 1992. Effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from Lake Washington on freshwater bioassay organisms and benthic macroinvertebrates. Ecology Report, 28 p. plus appendices. Burgner, R.L. 1991. Life history ofsockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Pages 3-117 in: Groot, C. and L. Margolis, eds. 1991. Pacific salmon life histories. UBC Press, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Entranco. 1995. Gypsy subbasin analysis, technical memorandum No. 2. Prepared for the City of Renton, Washington. David Evans and Associates, Inc. 1997. Wetland determination report on the JAG Development Property, Renton, Washington. Prepared for CNA Architecrure Group, Bellevue, WA. Fisher, L., Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Personal communication to Andy Kindig (Beak), June 6, 1997. Heiser, D. W. and E. L. Finn, Jr. 1970. Observations of juvenile chum and pink salmon in marina and bulkheaded areas. Supplemental progress report, Washington State Department of Fisheries. September 1970. 28 p. King County. 1993. Sammamish River corridor conditions and enhancement opportunities. King County Surface Water Management, Seattle, WA. 54 p. plus appendices. Larson Anthropological/Archeological Services, 1997. Culrural Resonance Assessment JAG Development, King County, Washington. Technical Report 97-7, March 27, 1997. Muckleshoot Indian Tribe. 1997. Draft summary of Lake Washington srudies completed by the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe in the vicinity of the Port Quendall project. Provided by Rod Malcom, habitat biologist. Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, Environmental Division, Auburn, WA. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (Metro). 1989. Quality of local lakes and streams 1987- 1988 status report. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, Water Resources Section, Water Pollution Control Department, Seattle. WA. Norton, 1991. Distribution and Significance of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Lake Washington Sediments Adjacent to Quenda!J Terminals/ J.H. Baxter site. Ecology Report, 73 p. Norton, 1992. Results of Sediment Sampling in the J.H. Baxter Cove, Lake Washington -June 1991. Ecology Technical Document, 18 p. Februo.ry 17, 2000 ASSOCIATED EARm SCIENCES, INC. ACK!jhlld -KB99l42A57 -lD-D:ildlUJO -W1K Page 59 QuendaU and Bauer Properties Mitigation Analysis Memorandum Pfeifer, B. and J. Weinheimer. 1992. Fisheries investigations of Lakes Washington and Sammamish, 1980-1990. VI Warmwater fish in Lakes Washington and Sammamish (draft report). Washington Deparunent of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA. Rane, L. D. and E. 0. Salo. 1985. Under-pier ecology of juvenile pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) in Commencement Bay, Washington. Final report prepared by the University of Washington, Fisheries Research Institute for the Port of Tacoma. FRI-UW-8508. December 1985. Shepard, M.F. and J.C. Hoeman. 1979. Some comparisons ofbenthis biota in control areas and areas affected by sewage effluent in Lake Washington, 1977 -1978. U. W. College of Fisheries, Wa. Coop. Fish. Res. Unit, Seattle, WA. citation from EVS Consultants, 1990. Aquatic Resources of Lake Washington. Report prepared for Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Seattle, WA. November 19, 1990. Thermoretec (RETEC). 1997. Sediment quality memorandum. Consultant report prepared for Port Quendall Company. April 29, 1997. Remediation Technologies, Inc., Seattle, Washington. University of Washington. 1996. U.W. Lake Washington Sockeye Workshop. Notes from presentations by Roger Tabor (USFWS), Roland Viera (U.W.) and Tom Sibley (U.W.) at U.W. conference held November 19, 1996. Washington Department of Ecology. 1995. 1994 Washington state water quality assessment, [305(b)J report companion document. Olympia, WA. Washington Department of Ecology. 1996. 303(d) Department of Ecology draft decision matrix for surface waters listed under section 303(d) included in 305b Report of the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA). Washington Deparunent of Ecology, Olympia, WA. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and Western Washington Treaty Indian Tribes. 1994. 1992 Washington State salmon and steelhead stock inventory, Appendix 1, Puget Sound stocks, South Puget Sound volume. WDFW, Olympia, Washington. Wydoski, R.S. and R.R. Whitney. 1979. Inland fishes of Washington. University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA. 220 p. February 17, 2000 ASSOCTATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. A.CK!jhlld · KlJ99J42AS7. l.D·D: lld\2-00. W1.K Page 60 I APPENDIX H 1990 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH N 0 ci.. a; 1ii "' 8 ~ g "' 0 0 "' ~ ...J c§ z w :::, 0 ~ § ........ 9 "' .0 0 ;:i " C: fil ;~ "' ll E C. 0 ~ 0, 0 0 N ~ --,.,ANQEAC~~~ 'L,, ~ DRAFT LEGEND: Property Lin e (approx imate) () 0 150 I Sc ale in Feet I Appendix H 1990 Aerial Photograph Port Quendall Terminal Natural Resource and Habitat Assessment Report Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment Face Page COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued by File No.: NCS -380710 -WAl FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY First American Title Insurance Company, herein called the Company, for valuable co nsideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of t itle insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagor of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges t herefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Compa ny, either at t he time of the issuance of the Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment if preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations here und er shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occ urs, provided that the failure to issue such po licy or policies is not the fault of the Company. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized officer or agent. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this commitment to be sig ned and sealed, to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, al l in accordance with its By-Laws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown i n Schedule A as "Effective Date." First American Title Insurance Company By: -··-ti~/~-----u //(./~ President Attest: IJl u,[ J:_ ~ Secretary By: ~/" ~ Cou ntersi gned First American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment File No.: NCS-380710-WAl Page No. 1 To: .. 4,_/1/ -First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services 818 Stewart Street, Suite 800, Seattle, WA 98101 (206)728-0400 -(800)526-7544 FAX (206)448-6348 Donna F. Koerber (206)615-3021 dkoerber@firstam.com CenturyPacific LP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 1680 Seattle, WA 98101-3029 Attn: Campbell Mathewson SECOND REPORT SCHEDULE A Ce Nedra Van Why (206)615-3131 cvanwhy@firstam.com File No.: NCS-380710-WAl Your Ref No.: Quendall Terminals 1. Commitment Date: May 28, 2009 at 7:30 A.M . 2. Policy or Policies to be issued : Standard Owner's Coverage Proposed Insured: To Follow $ AMOUNT PREMIUM TAX To Follow $ To Follow $ To Follow 3. The estate or interest in the land described on Page 2 herein is Fee Simple, and title thereto is at the effective date hereof vested in: Quendall Terminals, a Washington joint venture comprised of Puget Timber, Inc., a Washington corporation and Altino Properties, Inc., a Washington corporation 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: The land referred to in this report is described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. First American 77tle Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment EXHIBIT 'A' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: File No.: NCS-380710-WAl Page No. 2 THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 5 IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., AND SHORELAND ADJOINING LYING WESTERLY OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY AND SOUTHERLY OF A LINE, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOW S: BEGINNING AT THE QUARTER CORNER ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE NORTH 89°58'36" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 5, 1,113.01 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHERN PAOFIC RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH 29°44'54" EAST 849.62 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT A; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 29°44'54" EAST 200.01 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE LINE HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE SOUTH 56°28'50" WEST 222.32 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 59°24'56" WEST 100.01 FEET FROM SAID POINT A; THENCE NORTH 59°24'56" WEST TO THE INNER HARBOR LINE AND THE END OF SAID LINE DESCRIPTION ; ALSO THAT PORTION OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 5 LYING SOUTHEASTERLY OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, WESTERLY OF SECONDARY STATE HIGHWAY NUMBER 2A AND NORTHWESTERLY OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF PUBLIC STATE HIGHWAY NUMBER 1 AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED JANUARY 15, 1964 UNDER RECORDING NO. 5687408; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 19, 2008 UNDER RECORDING NO. 20080619001179. Rrst American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment SCHEDULE B -SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the Requirements to be complied with: File No.: NCS -380710-WAl Page No. 3 Item (A) Payment to or for the account of the Granters or Mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Item (B) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record. Item (C) Pay us the premiums, fees and charges for the policy. Item (D) You must tell us in writing the name of anyone not referred to in this Commitment who will get an interest in the land or who will make a loan on the land. We may then make additional req uirements or exceptions SCHEDULE B -SECTION 2 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS The Policy or Policies to be issued will contain Exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. B. Any facts, rights, interest, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of person in possession thereof. C. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. D. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. E. (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) Water rights, claims or title to water; whether or not the matters excepted under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records; (4) Indian Tribal Codes or Regulations, Indian Treaty or Aboriginal Rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. F. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, materials or medical assistance theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records . G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, construction, tap or reimbursement charges/costs for sewer, water, garbage or electricity. H. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse clai ms or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgages thereon covered by this Commitment. First American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) C.Ommitment File No.: NCS-380710-WAl Page No. 4 SCHEDULE B -SECTION 2 ( continued} SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 1. Lien of the Real Estate Excise Sales Tax and Surcharge upon any sale of said premises, if unpaid . As of the date herein, the excise tax rate for unincorporated area of King County is at 1.78%. Levy/Area Code: 2151 For all transactions recorded on or after July 1, 2005: • A fee of $10.00 will be charged on all exempt transactions; • A fee of $5.00 will be charged on all taxable transactions in addition to the excise tax due. 2. Facility Charges, if any, including but not limited to hook-up, or connection charges and latecomer charges for water or sewer facilities of King County Water District No. 107 as disclosed by instrument recorded April 1, 1981 under Recording No. 8104010618. 3. Relinquishment of all existing and future rights to light, view and air, together with the rights of access to and from the State Highway constructed on lands conveyed by document in favor of the State of Washington: 4. 5. 6. 7. Recorded: Recording No.: October 16, 1951 4178247 Easement, incl uding terms and provisions contained therein : . Recording Information: March 20, 1963 under Recording No. 5562896 In Favor of: Puget Sound Power and Light Company, a corporation, its For: Affects: successors and assigns Power line The Northwesterly portion of the property herein described Westerly of Railroad right of way Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: November 20, 1964 under Recording No. 5814320 In Favor of: Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, its successors and assigns For: Utility easement Affects: The Northeasterly portion of the property herein described Westerly of Rail road right of way A lease dated July 1, 1974, executed by Quendall Terminals, a Joint Venture of Puget Timber Company and Altino Properties, Inc., as lessor and Turbo Energy Leasing, Inc., a corporation as lessee, for a term of a month-to-month tenancy commencing with the date of this lease recorded November 8, 1974 as Recording No. 7411080549 of Official Records. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements: Recorded: July 16, 1975 Recording No.: 7507160536 First American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment File No.: NCS-380710-WAl Page No . 5 8. 9. 10. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: July 7, 1980 under Recording No . 8007070459 In Favor of: City of Renton, a municipal corporation For: Public utilities (including water and sewer) Affects: Portion of the property herein described Westerly and adjacent to Railroad right of way Subject to the terms of the Joint Venture Agreement between Puget Timber Company and Altino Properties Inc., dated June 15, 1971, amendment thereto dated September 12, 1980, both appearing under Recording No. 8102190531, recorded February 19, 1981. According to rectical on easement under Recording No. 9602150689, recorded February 15, 1996; J.H. Baxter & Co., a California limited partnership appears to have succeeded Puget nmber Company, a joint venturer. All amendments to said Joint Venture Agreement must be submitted prior to closing to determine the current signator ies. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: February 15, 1996 under Recording No . 9602150689 In Favor of: Barbee Mill Co., Inc., a Washington corporation, and J.H. Baxter & Co., a California limited partnership For: Roadway and utilities Affects: The East 60 feet adjacent to West margin of Railroad right of way 11. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Land Corner Record" recorded May 29, 1997 as Recording No . 9705290636 of Official Records. 12. Conditions, notes, easements, provisions contained and/or delineated on the face of the Survey recorded February 9, 2000 under Recording No. 20000209900005, recorded in Volume 135 of surveys, at Page(s) 176, i n King County, Washington. 13. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: September 2, 2008 under Recording No. 20080902001178 In Favor of: City of Renton , a mun icipa l corporation , its successors and assigns For : Sanitary sewer utilities and utility pipelines Affects: as described therein 14. Private access to said premises is across a railroad right of way. This company will require that the "Private Roadway and Crossing Agreement", and any assignments or modifications thereof which were issued by the Railroad Company, be submitted for examination . The coverage then afforded under any policy(ies) issued, relative to access to said premises, will be limited by the restrictions, cond itions and provisions as contained therein. If no "agreement" exists, the forthcoming policy(ies) will contain the following exception: The lack of right of access to and from the land across a railroad right of way. 15. Any question as to the true location of the lateral boundaries of the said 2nd Class Shorelands. 16. Right of the State of Washington in and to that portion, if any, of the property herein described which lies below the line of ordinary high water of Lake Washington. First American Title Insurance Company Fo rm WA-5 (6/76) Commibnent File No.: NCS-380710-WAl Page No. 6 17. Rights of the general public to the unrestricted use of all the waters of a navigable body of water not only for the primary purpose of navigation, but also for corollary purposes; includ ing (but not limited to) fishing, boating, bathing, swimming, water skiing and other related recreational purposes, as those waters may affect the tidela nds, shorelands or adjoining uplands and whether the level of the water has been raised naturally or artificially to a maintained or fluctuating level , all as further defined by the decisional law of this state. (Affects all of the premises subject to such submergence) 18. Terms, conditions, provisions and stipulations of the Joint Venture Agreement of Quendall Terminals, a Washington joint venture. A copy of the current agreement and any amendments must be submitted prior to closing. Any conveyance or encumbrance of the Joint Venture property must be executed by all of the Joint Venturer. 19. Title to vest in an incoming owner whose name is not disclosed. Such name must be furn ished to us so that a name search may be made. 20. Unrecorded leaseholds, if any, r ights of vendors and security agreement on personal property and rights of tenants, and secured parties to remove trade fi xtures at the expiration of the term. Arst American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment INFORMATIONAL NOTES A. General taxes for the year 2009 wh ic h have been paid. Tax Account No. 292405-9002-03 Amount: $25.20 Assessed Land Value: $1,000.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $0.00 File No.: NCS-380710-WAl Page No. 7 B. Effective January 1, 1997, and pursuant to amendment of Washington State Statutes relating to standardization of recorded documents, the following format and content requirements must be met. Failure to comply may result i n rejection of the document by the recorder. C. Any sketch attached hereto is done so as a courtesy only and is not part of any title commitment or policy. It is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and First American expressly disclaims any liability which may result from reliance made upon it. D. If this preliminary report/comm itment was prepared based upon an application for a policy of title insurance that identified land by street address or assessor's parcel number only, it is the responsibility of the applicant to determ ine whether the land referred to herein is in fact the land that is to be described in the policy or policies to be issued. E. The description can be abbreviated as suggested below if necessary to meet standardization requirements. The full text of the description must appear in the document(s) to be insured. Ptn Govt. Lot 5, Sec 29 Twp 24N Rge SE APN: 292405-9002-03 F. A fee will be charged upon the cancellation of this Commitment pursuant to the Washington State Insurance Code and the filed Rate Schedule of the Company. END OF SCHEDULE B First American ntle Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment -4,..../# First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services COMMITMENT Conditions and Stipulations File No.: NCS-380710-WAl Page No. 8 1. The term "mortgage" when used herein shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment, other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act or reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclosure such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option, may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of Policy or Policies committed for, and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the Policy or Policies committed for and such liability is subject to the Insuring provisions, exclusion from coverage, and the Conditions and Stipulations of the form of Policy or Policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by references, and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises out ofthe status of the title to the estate or interest or the lien of the Insured mortgage covered hereby or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to the provisions and Conditions and Stipulations of this Commitment. First American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment The First American Corporation First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services PRIVACY POLICY We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information Fi le No.: NCS-380710-WAl Page No. 9 In order to better serve you r needs now and in t he f uture, we may ask you to provide us with certain information. We understand that you ma y be concerned about what we will do with such information particularly any personal or financial information . We agree that you have a right t o know how we will utilize the personal Information you provide to us. Therefore, together with our parent company, The First American Corporation, we have adopted this Privacy Polley to govern the use and handling of you r personal infonnation. Applicability This Privacy Po licy governs our use of the information which you provide to us. It does not govern the manner in which we may use infonnation we have ob tained from any other source, such as information obtained from a public record or from another person or entity. First American has also adopted broader guidelines that govern our use of personal infonnation regardless of its source. First America n ca lls these guidelines its Fair I nformation Va lu es, a copy of which can be found on our website at www.firstam.com. Types of Information Depending upon wh ich of our services you are utilizing, the types of nonpublic personal information that we may collect include: • Infonnation we receive from you on applications, forms and in other communications to us, w hether in writing, in person, by telephone or any other means; • Infonnation about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others; and· • Infonnation we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Use of Information We request information from you for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffiliated party. Therefore, we will not release you r information to nonaffiliated parties except: ( 1) as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested of us; or (2) as permitted by law. We may, however, store such information indefinitely, including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased . Such information may be used for any internal pu rpose, such as quality control efforts or customer analysis . We may also provide all of the types of nonpublic personal infor mation listed above to one or more of ou r affiliated compani es. Such affiliated companies include financial service provider s, such as title insurers, property and casua lty insurers, and trust and investment advisory companies, or compa nies involved in real estate services, such as appraisa l companies, home warranty companies, and escrow companies. Furthennore, we may also provide all the information we collect, as described above, to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies, or to other financial institutions with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketing agreements. Former Customers Even if you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you. Confidentiality and Security We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your information. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those individuals and entities who need t o know that information to provide products or services to you. We will use our best efforts to tra in and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your Information w ill be hand led responsibly and in accordance w ith this Privacy Policy and First American's Fair Information Values. We currently maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard you r nonpublic personal infonnation. c 2001 The First American Corporation -All Righ ts Reserved First American 77tle Insurance Company ... UMlTED A.CCf:SS WARRANT¥ DEED In th, Matttr of 'PSmWl.t Sfotc Jllghwa11 No. 1, ~ TO ~ Cl) ~ KNOW ALL l.fSN BY THESE PRESf.ITT'S, l'hat the Grontor ~ ~IU.i 'l'AR !t Cn!SKICAL OORPaUTIOH, formr~ :.,';, ~o OlmOOOrINO_ ocwmj &6 In41ana oorporation, :!) 1!) for and in coltl'idCTation oJ the sum oJ -------------'fa Alm M0/00..-------------------Dollars, &nd othor nl.u.abl.o co~id,t,r:l•.ion hereby conucy and warrant ated in l1%l3 to the State of Washington, the following de:cribcd real estate ,itu - County, in the Stoic of W(Uhlngton: all tllat po..-t.ioa ot tho .toll<mil\1t dcacribod Parcol ".l" ~ 1touthoa11tcrly of tJ10 roUCJVing doso~ lino, l»giruung o.t a point oppoait.<I lliWnt'O" l\ig1n:)or 1o Station 8..00 (464+06.9) ..nd 125 !eot Mortl:Mleter~, ld\en tMl6lu-ed at ritlht ansloa ar,d/or radi&l.l.y !roll! tho cent.or lino o! Praary st&to ~ ?lo. 1 ., Root.."'11 to lteo:eydalo, Ulon.co Southwatcrly in A ~t lino to a point Cppo8ito ~ longiooor'o St.at.ion 46\.+SO £nd 275 foot ?lo::-tl1V01Jter~· thorefr<m.~ the.Me Morthveatorly 111 o. atl-night lino at rii;ht angl.011 to the huatorzy right. o! wa,y l.1nD o! Lale• lilashlngt.cn Boulol.&rd to a point o! in- toroeotion rlth eaid right .a! yny J..i.M; thonoo Sou~t.crl.y along 111.id Eantorly rl&ht o.! ~ limi o.! Lc1bD Vaohington DouJ.cr.-ard to 11. point o.! int.irnaotion with the Horthor:1¥ right o! 'WQY lliHi o! Sout.hoa11t 80th Strcot. and U10 ond o! th111 llr.o do11~ cr1pt1on, fQrcol "J."1 T'hat port.ion o! <Jo't"GruJMnt Lot S, Se<ltion 29, Town.,hip 24 Hortll, Range S iaoi. W.M., ~ castor~ o! t..bo O:lOtorl.y ri{;ht o! vay lino of Ulo North om Pu.cif1o ~J ~opt ~ Roa.cl.A; J.nd lxcept tho110 portion!l conn,yod t.o the St.at.o o.! Wc.abingtc,n tor ~ purpo11oz, l:o' d.ood recordod undor J.udi tor' a file Noa • .3229177 1ud 4178247 and 50u9602, rcco~ o.! King Co.mt,yJ aituato in tho Councy o.! IU..ng, St£to o! \unh.ingt.qp..---. c· :><'~-~~~·,·,,• .-,,d •. • -1;-.,. r~./ ,•11,,,,,,.,.._-... The, l.&wia horr,in Ct'llTII.Y'ed J;Of\tAin -allztro1 "Q!:U~ff£cra3 ~re or. lel!II , , . the spet1Jic ddall! conccrnillg au orw1uch ore 'o lie founiJ to1lhi11 1that cerlnin mo~ of defi 11 ilt' 1,~·,111111 1 IIOW of record and on file in rl1c offic:c of the Director of Highways at OlymJ>in ond lir11 ri11lJ dull' n/ up, pro,·al ,1une 4. 1963, and tho cent.or l..1no ot llhich 1.lt a.loo llhovn o.t ~cord in Volwno .), o! lli.ghlfay Pl.At:s, p~ 51, record.ti o! oA1J ocnmty • .t..l.!lo, tho (;X'antor hDrOin O(>~ and varrAnt to tho state o! Va.oh.in&t.on All r11 :ht:s o! ir:;ranis o.nd ogNoa (1.nolud.iJ:l6 .,J.J. o.xiat .. 111g, f'ut.UN or ,io~nti.u ea.oo.mcmto o! &ecoeo, light, viev ~ air) to, fr<m llJ'ld bot.won Pr1mlU'y st.,te Higmi~ l!o. 1, &men Crook to \food.land and tru, re.aaindor o! ooid Po.reel "A"• The \U¥1or~ agreeo to tlUrI'OI)ior poa~o~o1on or tho pro:d..~oa convc-;ed horoln on or Woro F~Sf(u/Uf /o. l'ft4. It iJ undcrJtood and agreed lhat the dclii:cry u/ thu deed i.s /1erl'l>!J rendered and 1/1111 t/1c ll'nn.< nnd olJlig ,·,.,n, hereof ,hall not become binding upo11 the State of \\'aJhing:on un!1·~s nnd u11ti! mT,·precl nnd approt•rd hereon in wriling for the State of Wn.d1ingro11, D,•1>o rtment o f lli9l1u•aJ1s. b11 tl ,r C hir/ Right of Way Agent. Datt'cf th is .IO !f .... day of 5:) ~ ! '1'• ~. Pt.reel 1-2896 . , .. :.~~-'.'.' , ~, J_d /,1/ /ic:ccptcd and appr()l)cd ./_ ___ /-:': ij _7 . STATE OF WASHINGTON ,, 0~..,.n-OF HtCIIWA VS By ~rtff:_(/_E~/ Chlrf RIQM of Wav Aotnl/ ..... ··"·rv~-:· •• \ . n.l'.:ILU TAl< "< CIIEtUC AL COk!'OiU,:~·~~-.:,~' REJ'l ·etrc O!':o··--1·"· """"'·•·y C."fl--.. ~. ,., ., i-•• :.n,•, n ,, \A.'t"",r N' •·, 'Ii -:-, t , . • ·. -r: i 1:". • -. \ ()~ -: •f" / /{. 0 .~~ -~~~-·~,,: :., ~; r.-. l r,.:,,f~.:...,. ·:: ~· . ~ /\...J.-.(-. . c,· , .... ..,.,. .,. .· < t T. r., P.cill t, ~ Pr,o11i ~~ \.•/· •. ·· .' • , .. ,-:., t "ffl' .. " .... '•,,T,,t\ , . .,,.-.,.,' • ~ .... . .. . . ·--- lfn4M1h~J 1clmowltdrment fmn) STAtt or w ASIUNOTOlt, } "· Co-urtt!,I oJ-·····-·-.. ·-··-·· .. ··-· .. ······-.. CO 1, tha unclttlif)ned, a noUl'll public in and fOT" th" State '>I Waihl11g1on, hcttb11 ccrCl/11 that on 1/1b :;:: ...... , ...... -......... , .. _4..;fo11 0/ .................................. --···-··~ .................... per1on<1lly op~ured b~fore Utt! ~ -· ---·····-·· --.. ·····-· .... ·--·---·-···" .... _ ........... ___ .... .....•. . .... . X) u:i l!') ,--- cJ I 4 ..... .<) ~ '. to m111rn~m tu be Chfl lndluldunl.. ... d(',c,ib4:d {n nnd ,oho t .ucuh•ct lht foregoing lnstrnnwn,, a1ul <11'· r.:nowledgcd tltat ______ sir,11cd and ,cnlcd the same cu ••.. -.•...•... _ •. fra and uoh1ncnrv ace ond deed , Jor the ll3CY ond Jl1i r poYcs therein nti!ntione,I. Given under m!J hand 011d official ~eal che day and yeur laS: uboue written. /lc1ll.ll 110111 ...... . INDIANA (Curporallnn ll<knowlc-dJl'lltnl form) :::::ro~ ........ -..... } ss. On thi.T .. /0. Cf..:. duy of. 1:J .. ~-:-... 1 .. 1..f..~ . l11•forc me pcr,011olly oppeur,·cl ...... T .•.. t t J~o_q _l;y _ ... ..... . . .... .. ... nm!. . .. • to me knoUtn to be the ........ 'l.~ct1 ... l'rt>_11 _itl,1_1_1t......... . . .. and .... o/ the curporution tltnt l!.i:ccut cJ the /orrgoill'.J instmmcnt, n111! ncknowlPdgcd ,nitl i1u1runt4;\li.l.·•IO ,Li:, rJ ,c free arid ooluntary aeL and dccd of said corporation, Jor the uses and µurpo.Tc.s thcrci1J ··~~1\~ff{'o.!ld htl WIUI • • , ' ,i+ ,•' '.) \ 1 l)').'.J. ~ 011 oath slnCcd tltnl. ................................. ·-... _.a11t/;onud to c.:rcculc 3a1d m.s1ru111e1"1f ~ /&~~ .t~c·,i:i>\-:;. !.:l]i.:rcd is the corporate 3eal of said. corporation. I ·~!·~J;"i> ~ 1~1":"" • 'I. : ~~_:· t C r;·, : -· Git>e11 tt11tlcr 11111 liand ancl official ,en! the da111111d year ln~l n bot•~ turilll'II. ;/ \ ~~~'$;' :~ ~/-, J,w-.J t. r]~·····~ o~.:-!;~.\.,··~< o: :::.. II ,.,.. i: (-4 5 I ~. z i u 9 · 0 ~- E- C Q ~: z -= i i §I 00 a < jS ~ ..:I I I ~ ~! 0 "'' ti:i E,t ti~ ,11 .l'llbtk h• ond for ,i.~ s::~ t.lrfll.~"~~\ .. fi;d \:in.1 . ...,~!'( llui.llnt1 al • )~,.;. • ....,,...._,,_,.. r: ,~,,~ \X Ci::::' . " \ '.\ \ RECCncrn I VOL. .......................... i'.AGC.: ... .... :--~ :•Jt~ T Of 1%4 Jf,,~ IS Ml II 36 tlCU ~.,\' I . , . ·:1.;tf0:1 K,h,., • ·.'L '• ~· 1:.1SH . 0 ! C ~ ... fi ~ :i ~ ~a~ 1 l1! : ......••• 4 I,, .~, !(' .:,{c; - .. ,-( r.i :?: ::, tl ::! .0, it: ~ " ~ ~ ~ ti • g· ii I q, I i ;j i · I\ < t; ei ·-.l~PUT'( j&ij ~ ~,; :.~ ~ lUUtlU61~UU11/S .vv IIIIIIIIIIIIIIHI 20080619001179 Return Address: City Clerk's Office City o f Ren ton 1055 South Grady Way Renton , WA 98057 DEED OF DEDICATION Project File #:LUA-02-040 CITY OF RENTON D 48 ·00 PAGE001 OF 007 06/19/2008 14:23 KING COUNTY , UA E2351140 06/19/Z00S 14:23 Ki~~ COUNTY , UA $!0 .00 SALE $0 .00 PAGE001 OF 001 Property Tax Parcel Number: 2924059002 Street Intersection: N 4200 place and N 43"' St. Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Add itional re ference nwnbers are on page __ . Granto .. (s): Grantee(s): I. Quendall Termi na ls, a Washington joint 1. City of Renton, a Mun icipal Corporation venture LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of Government Lot 5. Section 29, Township 24 North. Ran ge 5 Ease . W .M ., as described on attached Exhibit A. The Gramor. for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys. quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Orantcc(s) as named above, for public road rig ht of way purposes. the above desc ribed real es tate si ruared in rhe County of King. State of Washington. This Dedi cation is located within a Federal Superfund Site regulated by th e U.S. Envi ronment~ Protection Agen cy. Grantee shal l in demnify. defend and hold harmless Grantor. its successors and assigns. fr o m any damage, liability , claim. lien, or loss, includ i ng at to rney's fees and costs. aris in g out of use of the Dedication by Grantee, its agents, contractors, s uccessors in Litle, ass igns, authori zed persons, and/or all others acti ng on its behalf. except to the e11tent such damage , liability. claim. lien, or loss. is due to the negl igence or intentional misconduct of the Gramor or an agent, contractor. suc cessor in ticle . authorized person, assign of Gra n tor. Gran tee shall be solely responsible fo r the management and disposal of any waste generated as a result of operation or ma in tenance wit hin the dedicated area by Grantee or it s authorized representative and Grantee shall be the generator of any was te resulting from those activities. Grantee shall indemnify, defe nd and hold harmless Granror, its successors and assigns. from any damage, liability , cla im. lien. or loss or any costs of expenses, includ in g attorney's fees and costs. associated with the ge neration. management, di~posal of hazardous substances by Grantee or con tact with or exposure to hazardous substances resul tin g from subsurface activities authorized or perm itted by Grantee with in the Dedication after the Dedication. Grancor hereby reserves the te mporary righ t to use th e dedicated area to complete any environmental testing, remediati on o r oth e r ac tivi ties required by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Washington State Department of Ecology. or any other agency with authority pursuant to state or federal environmental laws ("Env ironme ntal Agenc ie s"), without the requirement for a street use permit or other approval from the City and without payment of any fee to the City. Orantor reserves a right of access over th e ded ication area fo r Envi ronmenta l Agencies and their aut hori ze d contractors in conn ection with its reg ulat ion of the Federal Superfund Site. Any work by the City or other pe rson in the ded icati on area shall be done in co mp liance with requirements of the Environmental Agencies and on ly after 30-day notice to the appropriate Environmental Agency, and Grantee shall indemnify and ho ld Grantor harmless from any cost, liabi lity or obligation relating to construction in or use of the dedicated area by Grantee or anyone au thorized by Gran tee, in cluding b ut not limit ed to com pliance with the requ irements o f any of the En vironm ental Agencies. [signatures on following page] IN WITNESS WHEREOF, sa id Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed this .1a__day of 3'.t.fc Approved and Accepted By: Grantor(s): QUENDALL TERMINALS, a Wa shingto n joint venture By Altino Properties. In c., a Washington corporati on, joint vent urer By J. H. Baxter & Co., a Californ ia limited partnership, joint venturer By J. H. Baxter & Co., a California Corporation, general ()artner Grantee(s): City of Renton By~~~~~~~ Deni s Law, Mayor 2008061 900 117~. ,_:,·= 2008 . Attest:~~ Michele Neumann, Deputy City Clerk Exhib it A Legal Description STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ) ) ss. ) On this A day of Ftbrutl}'.~, 2008, before me , the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the state of Washington, duly corrunissioned and sworn , personally appeared ROBERT CUGlNI to me known to be the Vice President of AL TINO PROPERTIES, INC, a Washington corporation, which is a joint venturer of QUENDALL TERMINALS, a Washington joint venture, that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknow ledged the said instrument to be the free and volu ntary act and deed of said corporation and joint venture, for the uses and purposes there in mentioned, and on oath stated that s/he is authorized to execute the sa id instrument. IN WITNESS ~~F.· I have hereunto se t my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. ~,,,'~. HA 'y ,,,,,, ~ ~C;; ~""""''''' VJ.,-</. ,,, /;; ..L, /J f ~=-ffeoNE.\'..0~1,~i ~ ~<lef ./C,~~u/~ 3 9[/ ~o°'M,-"'% ' NOTARY PUBLIC in an~the State of ~ UJ ~ 8 ~ · ~ <.J g 3 Washington, residing at 1~Jilf ~ 0 \ "us"'" q;,_f f; My appointment expires -,-: ... 5..,j,_],...._9.._Jt-l""o_.~.__--.----- ~1 o),>.''1 ,,,,, 5-19:?---,:-~ Print Name Oel 0-rl,5 k ~M vJ (t¥~ 11 "; ?' 1 ''""'"'' S '<' J 1111 ~ OF \J'J I'-.·' 11 111J1" ",•' DWI' 2237339v I 0032695-000004 ' Page 2 Exhibit A Lega l Description EXHIBIT"A" NORTH 42ND PLACE LEGAL DESCRIPTION Project WOii PID GRA'JTOR: Street: Th.'lr po ttiou o f Government L-0t S, Section 29, Township 24 North, Rongc 5 F ~<r, \Xi .M., C ity o f Renton, King County, Washington, dcocril,cd as follows: llcgi1luing •t the inrcc.ccrion of !he soutli line ot s:lid Govc.mtnem Lot 5 md the wes terly r:ruugin of the IOll foot wide Bu.tlingto n ~<irthc.rn Railroad Co. right-of-w2y; !hence N .30°54'57"E. •long the w=cdr margin of said railr01ld rigbt-of-way, 150.00 focr, Thence lc;iv1111, ,w.J right-of-u••y marg11', N.S9°0S'03"W., (,Q.00 fc.:1; Tlu::n cc S . .10°54'5,"W. p•nlld co .. -.id righr-of-,,.·ay margin l 8-1.25 feet lo the south line of s-.ud Gnvcmmctlt Lor 5; Tiu:ncc S88°48'22''E. 69.09 feet to the Po int o f Ileginning. Cont2.lrullg ,n :.re., of 10,027 squ,rc feet, more or less. I o f 2 owr 2237 339v l 0032695-000004 Page 3 iuu~u61~ou111~--- ·, ~ Q "' <t> ~ "' ~ ~ ~ / a, 1 a ~ ~ ;;;, ii I Map Exhibit I I I JIit t-! J' ~ ~ I /-/ ~Ol/TH UNE GO'(T LOT ~. / ~ T.24N . .jR.5E., W.~~ ijJI POB / I &: I & Id, I ~"( I /J) " 40· o' : i-...-.... 40 ' so· & SCALE :1--------------------------t IN FEET Barbee Mill DWT 2237339v I 0032695-000004 Pag e 4 20080619001179 .:: : I 2008061900117~ ::::· CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ~~~~~~~~~ State of Californ ia County ot'?o. n On _ _l:_:~>)-0 ~ } be fore me, UJ,t..j ). ~ Date personally appeared ~ t:)V •Ct ~ )(.. ~ Here l nser Name and Trtle of the Officer ~ •· Name(s) of Slgncr(s) ~-···········J a LORI J. STUMPF CommJ:sslon # 1 53 8054 i Nota,y Public · Colllornla J i San Mateo County d t.t., Comm. exp.es Dec 24, ••••••••••• who proved to me on t he basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(t') whose name(•) is/~ subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that ~she/~ executed the same in lti8/her/1aeir authorized capacity(~). and that by tii51herl•r sig nature(@) on the instr um ent the person(~). or the entity upon behalf of which the person(&) acted, executed the instrument. I ce rti fy under PENALTY OF PERJURY unde r the laws of the State of California that the forego in g paragraph is true and correct. Place N01a ry Seal Ab<Jv e OPTIONAL ~___:::....:,...-_-=::....,......::~:::::.....~......,,_-------- rhough the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable e document and covld prevent fraudulent remova l and reattachment of this form to another document Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Docume~cL e-f2' .LJd,0~-k ~ Document Date: } -~ I -o?: _ Number of Pages: --'>""'----- Sign er(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Clai med by Signer(s) Signer's Name: __ IJ Individual p,,-t'"'>l'OP~ t- m-Corporate Officer -Title(s): C P= O LJ Pa rtner -lJ Limited LJ General 11 Attorney in Fact RIGHTTHUMBPRINT OF SIGNER Top of thumb here L Tru stee n Guardian or Con servator . -~-~t-:, . .;:t°>\;J~ .. ·F'.t' ' D Other: ,:..;; ·;'t;~~~:r: · . •. _, '"• O:\'.W?,• V,,/_;., ,1,;.!. r9.~:~~t~fi~·,. ------------':tf'.'~?:. ~-;·1,}~"WJ~:~:~~1~C,, Signer Is Repre senting: ____ !} ?:1,£'f;:?,;i:-< ·"'~,,1 ':~''.!,I,~ ' ', ----------'·' ~ i; ... Signer's Name: __ _ D Individual n Corporate Officer -Title(s): __ _ D Partner -f.J Li mited '.J General D Attorney in Fact O Trustee D Guardian or Conservator D Other: __________ _ Signer Is Representi ng: ____ _ RIGHTTHUt,1BPRINT OF SIGNER Top of lhumb here ~~'@,__~~~~ @2007 Naliooill Notary Association · 9350 De So:o Ave., P.O. Box 2402 •Cha1sworth. CA 9 1313·2402• www.Natto11alNolary.org 11cm #5907 Reorcler:Cal To!l·Frce 1-800·87&682i 2 00806i 900i i 7~ · .... ...... ~~~if .................. flit . '191' ......... » .. ....... ... -.... UV.~ 1rr.r. ~ • ., 1 .. 1' ,., /4."ll "r!.Lud. ,~.':11 'f!VSJ l'h'.-IA ; 1:S) IC l4t6 t"\\ l""-">> o-.:>-•r.: lft:t·rn<'\ W•I UlAlc.(.,•V 2008061900 1 17~ ... · PORTION OF GOV T LOT 1, SECTION 32 , 1 .:24 ,N., R5 E., W .M. CITY OF RENTON , KING COUNTY , WASHINGTON GO'R IGHT OF WAY DEDICATION SITE UNPLATTED T.L. 9002 S W. 29 -24-05 BARBt[ MIL @\ ' @: S.F. 3,834 S.F. J,828 :s.F. J,822 s.F ,-J ... ..... .. J S"E 1J.O I' '-; 9° --PUBLIC WA lt:R ES!>A 'T. • .,- SHT 9 SEE DETAIL ·c· SHT.9 -·-" N es·o4 'J9·· w 240.98' -..:-.,.....:c~&---"' N. 42ND PLACE ) .... 36.00 36.00 5.00 J6.00 .3 . O 1. ----------··-. -~-?°.uT -4~sio_s·F~ °i ~ g w w 72 ·w "' TRAC7 75 o, 71 ",n "' _OPEN S? AC<: · 0 '"' ''. ·. 0 z I I QUIT CLAlM DE£0 THE GRANTOR. REIUY T.\R AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION, an Indiana corporation. for and in e<>nsideration of TEN DOL.I.Aru; ($10 .00) and o ther valuable ccnsideration conveys and quit claims to Q{lt::NDALL TF~~N>.LS. a Joint Venture ~prised of Puget Tilllber , Inc ., a Wa shington COf";?Oration and Altino.Proper~ies, Inc ., a Wa shington corporat ion, the following described real estate, situate in the Co,mty of King , State of Wasnington: That portio n of Coverrunent Lot Sin Secti on 29, Township 24 North, Range 5 East, W.M. and shor eland adjoining lying Westerly o! the Northern Pacific Railroad Right of Wa y and Southerly o f a line dcs~ribed as follows: Bcg ,r,ning at t:l-,e ~ua rter corner on t.h e So u~;, line of saic S<>ct i on 29; thence :-iorth 89°58' 36" We st along the South line of s aid Lot 5, 1,113.01 feet to the We sterly line of s aid S c rthern Paci fic Railroad Right of Wa y; .hence North 29°44'54" East 849.62 feet along sa id Right of Way line to ~ point hereinafter referred to as Point A; thence continuing North 29°44'54" East 200 .0 1 feet to the true point o f beginning of the line herein described; thence South 56°26'50" West 222.3 2 feet to a point wh ich bea r s North 5 9°24'56" West 100.01 feet from said Point A; thence North S9°24'56" West t o the inner harbor line and the end o: s aid line description: Al so that portion of said Government Lot 5 l y ing Southeasterly of Lake Washington BoulevarJ, Westerly o ! Secondary State Highwal· Number 2A and Northwe sterly of the Right of Way of Public State Highway t,wnber l as established by <eed recorded unde r Auditor's file No. 5687408 , conta ining 31. 7 acres more or les s (accuracy to one acre) of which 12 .8 acr e s are underNater shorelands . TOGETHER with the following: The Harbor Area Lease dated the 30th day of '.iovember, 1943, between the Port of Seattl e and Peter C. Reilly for that area l>etween the inner and outer harbor l ines lying adjacent to the area described above in Lake Was hingto n . All rights and inter est ln and to that certain lease between Foss Tug• Barge for booming and rafting of logs on Lake \o;ashington dated the 1 st day of Decembt=r , 196.1, l.Ji,tween Reilly Tar, Chemical and Foss Tug & Barge. Al l righ t s and permits, if any, from the Army Corps of Engineers for placing and locatin g s tructures, wharves, dolphins, piers and other devices that ~re in interference with navigation and require permits from the Army Co r ps of Engineers located in that area described in the Harbor Area Lease referred to above. THE GRANTOR, REILLY TAR AND CHEMICAL CORPO RAT ION, warrants that it has not created any encumbrances on the subject property since the ··-•. ·-.. ~\..:., ...... _..., ___ ....__...,..,. •• .., __ 1111w-·o112111111: Slllll#l.l!!!!lllilllllt•••••••••••tlli·11t1c111·•e -•••••·•-e111in!litlit1111m•---~----~-_. .. . __......._-----.. ... date o f clos ing of t he Real Estate Co ntract between Grantor and Grantee here in date d June 1;, 1 9 7 1 , but express ly d iscla i lllS any and all other warr~nties , exp res s o r i mpl i ed . Th i s deed i s given in fulfillJ11ent of that certain Re al· Estat~ Contrac t between t he part ies hereto. dated J une 15 . 1971, and conditioned for the c onve yance o f the above descri bed property . and the covenants of wa rran ty here in contained s hall JV>t apply to any t i t l e . i nte rest o r encl!lllbrance ari sing by , through o r unde r t h e purc haser in s aid contr a ct, and s~all not a pply to a n y t a xes, assess~ents o r other cha r ges lev ied. assessed or becomi n g due s u bsequ ent t o the date of sa1d contract. Reai Estate Sales Tax was µa1d on tii1s ,;a l e under Ri-:c . No. 1 4 8560 . I!> Wl'r.iESS WHE:IBOf , sa 1d cor;;o r ation has caused th1 s 1~strumtnt t (> be e xecutcc! b 1 "ts ~~o;c~ff1cers a~ it s corpo ratP se a l t o be J..2... 'ia:: of .fi C 7u;.._,-, I 9 : S . RE!Af'.Y TA~EMI C?IIJ. CORPORATION . I dv"'--R,· '-,, (I l.e ! res id.e t VJ j B,-&E~-~ Secreta r y STATE 0 F I~D!A!,A C0ur.t;-o t d,· J1._,: .; , Cn t h ,s ~-da1 o f Ju,..,.-, l97'.i, personal!·; appea r ed -~--·.,_re--~.! A,_,,,,; aild .f E ,,.,. ' 1t'J1t• • to me known to oe th~J>res1dtnt antl Secretary o f REILLY TAR AND CH EM ICA:.. CORPORATI O~, the •corpordt t on that executec the within and foregoing QUIT CLAH'. DEED , dnd ac~nowledyed sa1d instrument t o be the f r e~ and vo l unta r ,· act and deed of said c o rporation, for the uses and purposes t'ierein mentioned , dnd on oath stated that they werr authorized to execute said instrument and thdt the se.;.l a f fixed is the co r porate s eal of s~id co r ;:,oration. IN WITNESS WH E RE OF, I have hereunto set my n.and and affixed my o fficial seal t he day and year first above wr itten. r.'y c:-· )·· ,: ".978 • •4 __ ... _ ........ ~ _ _.,~_ ..... ,_ .... ___ • _______ _. ... ,1111 .. __ )0 __ ... , ... , •. aoll ___ ,111· ........ -,111=•r-o:m-., .... _~--~·.urd--_ ............ -.~ _--..,._ .. . 0 q n ~ "° .... ····· ·•···· :, fllfJ},/pr Record at -· .. --~ ----~ > l .. 0 1-01tt • • ** rtst t nECOROEu __ Cif •••••••• :: ••• REQUEST Oi C:RECTC~ RECOOOS &. ElECTIOHS l<ING CCUNTY, WASH. MC ·- • --.:.:i'--... -"-· I I K J :-:,; co:i ~TY \,','.'l'ER L' j .i'l'R j C l ' ::u ' KI t\C CC UN'rY , WASH I NGTltN a ) 1'0TlCL ,W l\f'D ITION!'I.L TAP OR C :''.IMECTION C H,\RG E ...i:; 0 :,,/01:ic c i s h0i-~,with (Jivcn th.:it l:iny Countv Walli:-r Distr ic-t ::> No. 1 07 , Ki.nq Co unt\·, Wc1;hi n qton, hc1s , o n ~lc1r ch 25, 1981, -q- C) und<?r Rf>sulution l\o . ·· I , d ctC'rminc d •ha t :1 t.:ip o r connC(:lion n charye , to be de termined !,)rtor t o construction of nc " water f ac i 1 it ies , ·.~ i ! l be .:is s essetl agai r,st the rcu l estutc '1escr i.bcd 011 Exhibit "A" heret o <1Ltached . DA T ED thls ...., ____ day of March , 1981. STATE OF Wi\SHll'<GTON) :SS COUNTY OF KING 101\.RD 0F COMMISSIONERS KING co_~T'y \~J\TE~ Dl ~TRICT NO . 107 ,! .L ' l:ly : ' _J J),L . '• .. Henrj P. McCullough, P r esiden t On this day personally appearP.d be[ore me, a duly commissi oned Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, HENRY r. McCULLOU Gli, ':.o me know:i t o be the Pre side nt of the Board of commissioners of King County Water District No. 107 and, beim; duly authorized , ac know ledged to me tha~ he signed the foregoing document as hi s f r eG and vol untary act and d eed for the uses and p urposes the rein mentioned. ·; -I! ,_ . GIVEN under my hand and seal this A .._\ day cf '7/& I\_., 1981 . ·] / / /7 .......... \ --.,.:.. ·-~~-. . / ·<·. ·~ Oc ·. ,· ·• -------..&.·(('-( ;:< &-:.. ""-¢, : I •;,. I ~ NOTll.RY PUBLIC in n r tl,e Sta'te ,.·. o[ Washinglon , residing at SeatL l e. .,. ,..:. I ,·,~ '·, -1- ............ I ' 1 ' ' ' I ! \ I ' i l t t l__ - 4::US I t'-..) ...i: l) l.l.) t l'ff, .:O,JIITY 1AU rt! f'lqRICT '10.101 Lr,. \1.. D[SCrnrT IQ~ 440 ~RAOIEN~ ~ER~IC~ AREA Pf\RT !ONS f'I ',[C'!Oil'.'> Q, tr,. 17, 70. /1, ?7 , ':-\, ?.9, 3:. 33 /\NO 34 , /\LL I N lOWNSHII' 24 'JOR ,11 , ll J\tlG[ 5 r11sT, W.M. AND PORTI ONS or SEC TION 4, TOWNSHIP 23 tlORTH, RI\NCE 5 EAST. W.M. ALL IN KltlG COUNTY , 1-!ASHll-iGTON D[SCRIBfO AS fOLLOWS: BEG?NNING AT THE INHRSECTION OF THF. CENTERUN ;: or PRIMARY <;T ATE HIG HWAY NC.2 AN D THE CENTERLINE Of S[CONOARY STA TE IIIGHW~Y N0.2A Ill THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWflSHIP 24 NORTH , RANC.£ 5 FAST, W.~·-; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE CENTERL HIE OF SECONDA RY STATE HIGHWAY tlO. 2A TO THE INTERS ECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF TIIE SOU TH HI\LF OF THE NORTHWES T QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST , W.H.; THENCE EAST /\LONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LIN£ or SA I D NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAIO EASf LJNE AN O ALONG THF WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16 TO THE INTERSECT!Ofl WITH THE CENTERLINE OF COAi CREEK PARKWAY; lHENCE SOUTHEAS TERl V ALON G SAi D CENTERLINE TO THE CEN TERLINE [NTER SECT ION W[TH S.E . NEWPORT WA Y; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE CFNTE RLINE OF S.[. NEWPORT WAY TO STATION P. T. 79~66.85 ON THE NEWPORT - JSSAQUAH ROAO NO . 941; THENCE llQR THW ESTCRLY TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF SAID S.E. NEWPORT WAY ; THENC[ NORTHERLY /\LONG SAID MARGIN TO A POIN T WII !CH LI ES SOUTH 22°29 '23" WEST 544 . S8 FEET FROM THE NORTH LJNE OF THE SOUTH EA'-T QUARTER OF T'E NORTHEl\q QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16; Tt1ENCE NORTH 81°57' wEST 11 5.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 22°29'23 " EAST, PARALLEL WJTII THE WE STERLY MARGIN OF SAID ~-E. NEWPORT WAY TO THC: NQ;{TH LINE Of THE SOUTHEAST QUART~R O• THE NORTHEAST QUARTER Of SAID SECTION 16; THENCE EAST ALONG SAIO NORTH LINE TO TH( EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE SOU TH ERLY ALONG SAID EAST LI NE AND ALOllG THE EAST LINE OF SLCTIONS 21 ANO 28 IN TOWNSHIP 24 /IORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. TO THE CE NTERLINE OF COAL CREEK PAP.K\IAY ~.E.; THENCE NORTHWESTER ~Y ALONG SAID CE NTE RLT NE TO THE CENTERL IN E INTERSEC TlON WITH S.E. 60TH STREET; -1- l ,, sue .. , Ki ng ~J unt, Wate r Oi s :rict No.107 ~e ga l De~cr i ption 440 Gradie nt Serv ice Area Paqe Two TH EtKE IIES!ERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE Of S.E. 60TH STREET TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE PUG(T SOUNl POW ER ANO LIG HT CGMPANY TRANS~I SS ION LI r;E (BE VE:RL Y-RENTON ) EASEMENT ; THENCE NORTHEASE~L" AL ON G SA ID CE NTERLINE TO THE EAST ERLY CO RNER OF LOT 7, BLOCK 2 OF NEWPORT HILLS N0.9 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 69 OF PL ATS, PAG E 17, RECO RDS OF KIN G COUNTY , WASHINGTON ; Tldl Cf NORTHERL Y ALON G THE EAST ~ !NE OF SAID BLOCK 2, TO THE NORTHEAST CORt-:ER THEREOF ; THEtlCE WE ST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 2 TO THE EAST LINE OF NEWPORT HILLS N0.5 AS Rf.CORDED I N VOLUME 66 or PLATS, PAGE 90, RECORDS OF SA ID COUN TY; THENCE NO ~TH ERLY ALONG SAID EAST LI NE TO THE NORTHEAST CORN ER THEREOF; THENCE WE ST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SA ID NEWPORT HILLS NO.~ TO THE SOUTH EAST COR NEK OF BLOCK 4, NEWPO RT HI LL S N0.13 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 73 OF PLATS, PAGE S 53 AND 54, RECORDS Or SA IO COUNTY; THENC E NO RTH ALO NG THE EAST LIN E OF SA 10 BLOCK 4 TO THE NORTH fAS T CO RNER THEREOF; THENCE WE ST ALONr; TH E NORT ~ LINE OF SAI D BLOC K 4, ANO ALONG THE WES TERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE SUR VEY LINE OF THE MERCER I SLAND PlPE LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY (128TH AVENUE S.E.); THEHCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID SURVEY LI NF. TO THE CEN TERLINE OF 127TH PLACE S.E.; THEN CE NORTHWESTER LY ALONG SA ID CENTERLI NE TO THE EAS TERL Y EXTENS ION OF TH E SOUTH l !NE OF LJ T 13, BLOCK 3 OF SAID NEWPORT HILL S N0 .13; TH ENC E WE STERLY ALONG SA ID SOUTH LIN E TO THE SOU THEA ST CORNER OF LOT 28 IN SAID BLOCK 3; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LI NE OF SAID LOT 28 ANO ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE CENTERLINE OF 126TH AVENUE S.E.; THENCE NORTH ERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF TH E SOUTHERLY LIN E OF LOT 5, BLOCK l , or SAID NEWPORT HILLS N0.13 ; TH ENC E WESTERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY E~T EN SION AND ALONG TH£ SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE SOUTHWEST -...... ,.. ~--·-:<·-.... -· ~- ,. ,. .... ' ·'W r J a.) .... ' C'> C) ~ 0 '1.) f ,n'J ·o inty lo.'ater Distric ~ ~·o.1:J7 Leq~l -~scription 440 Grdd 1e nt Ser vile Area Paqp Th,·ee ~OR NER OF SA ID LOT 5; TH[NCE SOUTHWFSTE~lY AND WESTERLY ALONG THt SOUi HEAS T~R LY AND SO UTH FRLY LI NES OF LCTS 22 , 2J , 24 IN SAI D BLOCK 1, AND WE Sl ERLY ALON G THE W(STrn LY EX TEN SION OF THE SOUTH llt,,f OF SAlll LOT 24 TO THE CENTERLINl OF 125TH AVENUE S.~.; T~E NCE SOUTH ALONG )AID CEN TERLIN E TO THE EA STE RLY EXTEf'ISI ON or THE SOU TH LINE OF LOT 14 OF NEWPORT HILi. S 110. 19 AS RECORDED l N VOLUME 77 OF PLAT S, PAGE 68 , REt:OROS OF SA ID CO UNTY ; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAI D EASTERLY EXTENSION AND ALONG THE SOUiH LINE OF SAID LOT 14 TO THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC 1 tON 21, TOW t;Sl'!P 24 NORTH, RANG( 5 EAST, W.M.; TH EN CE SOU TH ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND ALONG THE EAST L 'NE OF TH E SOU THW EST QUARTER OF SI\ID SEC TION 21 TO A ?O tN T Otl A L!NE PARALLEL WITH AND 150 FEET NORTH OF (MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLE S TO) THE CENT ERLINE or S.E. 60TH STREE T; THEN CE WEST ON SAID PARALLEL LI NE TO THE NORTHERL Y EXTENS ION Ot THE CENTER LINE OF 123RD AVENUE S.E.; THEKCE S0UTl1FR L Y ALONG SAID NORTH ERLY EXT CN S ION AN O /\LONG SAID CENTERLINF TO THE EAST ER LY EX TENS ION OF THE t,, H H LINE OF BLOCK 4 OF r!EWPORT HILLS NO.JO AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 70 OF PLATS, PAG E d, RECORDS OF SAI D COUNTY; THENCE WE ST ALON G SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AN O ALONG THE NORTH LI NE OF SAID BLOCK o TO TH E NORTHWES T CORNER THEREO F; THENCE SOU TH ALONG TflE WEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK 4 iO THE NORTH LHiE OF BLOCK l, NEWPORT HILLS N0.15 AS RECO RDE D IN VOLUME 72 ~F PLATS, PAGE 94, RECORDS OF SAID COU NTY ; THE NCE WE STE RLY AL ONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHWE ST COR NER OF SAID BLOCK 1; THENCE SOUTHER LY ALONG THE WE ST LIN E OF BLOC K 1 AND SCUTHERLY ALONG TrlE WE ST LI NE OF BLOCK 2 OF NEWPORT HI LLS N0.1 7, AS RECORDED IN VOI .UME 77 OF Pl.ATS, PAGE 66, RECORDS OF SAIO COUNTY, MD ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION THEREO F TO THE CENiERllNE OF S.E. 60TH STREET; THENCE WE STERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO THE r4ST LINE :r .•t -3- ~ -'l +~ ; co -.u ~ 0 ,....., l ~ 0 ~- u) •: ., ~ ~ing Coun ;y Water District No.107 Legal Oescription 440 Gradient Service Area Page Four lltST 742. ,3 FEET OF TP.E SGiJTHW[ST QUART£k OF TH[ NCRTHWE5T QUARTER OF SECTJON 28. TOWNSHIP 24 NORT!', RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. {ALSO KNOWN AS THE EAST LINE 3F TAX LOT 46 OF SAID SUBOIVISION}; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAlO EAST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOU TH 504.02 FEET 0~ SA!O SUBDIVISION; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE JF THE WE5T 300 FEET OF SAID SECTION 28; rnrncc SOUTH ALONG SAID EA ~T LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION ?.ll; THEN r.E EAST ALONG SAit SOUTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY EX TENSION OF THE WE ST LINE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 5 OF C.D. HILLJo\AN'S LAKE wASHlNGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITTON TO SEATTLE, DIVISION N0.8 AS RECORDED I~ VOLUME 16 OF PLAT S. PAGE 67 , RECORDS or SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION ANO ALONG T~E WEST LINE OF SAIO LOT l, ANO ALONG TH£ ~EST LINE OF LOT 4 OF SAID BLOCK 5 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOTS 5 OF SAIO BLOCK 5, THENCE £AST ~LONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 5, AND ALONG THE £A _ ~RLY EXTEIISION THEREOF TO THE CENTERLINE OF 120TH AVENUE S.E.; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO TIIE CENTERLINE OF S.E. 84TH STREET; THENCE EAST A.LONG THE CENTERLINE OF S .E. 84TH STREET TO TH~ tl!)RTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST UN[ OF LOT l, BLOCK 9 OF SAIO C.~. HILLMAN'S PLAT ; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID NORTf<E iU EXTENSION ANO ALON G THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT l A;iQ ALONG THE WEST LINES OF LOTS 4. 5 AND e m SAID BLOCK 9 TO TH E SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE Or SAID LOT 8 , AND ALONG THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF SA ID SOUTH LINE TO THE CENTERELI NE OF 122ND AVENUE S.E .; THENC c NORTH ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO THE CENTERLINE OF S.E. 84TH STR~ET ; THENCE EAST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF S.E. 84TH STREET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 300 FEET EAST OF (MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO} THE CENTERLINE Of lWIO AVEHUE S.E.; lllENCF SOUTH ALONG SAID PARALLEL LIHE TO THE SOUTH LINE Of LOT 2, -4- ~ .. :,&.1.~ • ......_--.-- ---...... cc i-. ·9 County Wate r Dis tri ct No.107 Legal Description 440 Grad i~nt Service Area Pd<Je Five BLOCK 10 OF SAID C.0. H!LLMAN'S Plf1T; TflENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH L'.NE OF SAIO LOT 2 AtlO ALONG THE NORTH L!NE OF LOT 6. BLJC:< 12 or SJ\10 C.O. HILLMAN''., PLOT TO A P:lllff ON A LlNE PII.RALLEL WITH MID 300 FEE.,. NORTH EAS TERLY OF (MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO) THE CENTERLINE OF S.E. 69TH PLACE; THENCE SOUTllEASTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO THE SO UTHEAST ~UARTER OF SECTION 33 , TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 5 EA~T, W.M.; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID Cc:NTERLINE TO HI E WESTER LY EXTENSION OF THE. NORTH LINE OF PCL 3 IN SHORT PLAT N0.877107 AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY AUDITOR 'S FlLE N0.780911088 9; THENC E !:AST ALONG ')AID WESTERLY EXTrnSTON AND ;,~OllG THE NORTfl LINE OF SAID PCl 3 TO THE NORTHEAST COR NER THEREOF; THE NCE SOU TH EASTfRLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINES OF PCL 3 ANO PCL 2 OF SAID SHORT PLAT TO THE NOR-HWEST CORNER or PCL : IN SAID SHORT PLAT; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALOI, THE NORTHERLY LIN E OF SklO PCL I AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY EXTrnSlON 1HERE0f TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT -Of-WAY OF TIIE ABANDONEQ PAC!flC COAST RA!LROAO IN THl sou :H[AST QUARTER OF SA ID SECTTON 33 ; THENC E SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE CENTERLINE OF S.E. 89TH PLACE; THEr ::E NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE MERCER ISLAND P!PE LINE RIG HT-OF-WA Y IN SAID SECTIOS 33; THENCE SOU THE ASTERLY ALONG SAID PIPE LINE RIGHT -OF-WA Y TO THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.; iHENCE SOUTH ALONG SA 1 ' ~ST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SA ID SECTION 34; THENCE EAST ALOtlG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVI SION TO T~E ~EST LJNE OF THE EAST 416 FEEr OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THEti CE SOU TH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 208 FEET OF Si 'D SUBO!VISION; THENCE EAST ALONG -5- ...... -.~--.---~ . '-Li 0 0 ,..- ,ing County Water Oi~trict Nc,.107 legal Oescriptiun 440 Gradient Service Ar~a Page Sil( 3 SAID SOOTH ur;,: TO THE WEST LINE 0~ THE SOUTHEAST Q!JAIITER OF THE ,0 SOUTHWEST QUARTFR OF SAIO SECTION J1; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO A POINT ON A LINE PARAL LE L WITH AND 30C FEET NORTHEASTERLY OF (MEASURED AT RIGHT MlfiLES TO) THE CENTERLINE OF S.E. M.~Y VALLEY ROAD; THE~~E SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF TUE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LlNE TO THE SOUTH LIN E OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE WEST ALONG SA ID SOUTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF SHORT PLAT N0.677007 AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY AUDITOR'S FlLE N0.7712090795; TP.ENCE NORTH, WEST ~ND SOUTH ALONG THAT PORTION OF LOT l IN SAJD SHORT PLAT LYING WITHIN THE SOt'-:-'-4\.IEST QUARTER OF HJE SOUTHEAST QUART ER OF SAID SECTION 34 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SA[O SECTION 34 ; THENCE WEST ALON G SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE NORTHEA ST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QIJARTER OF SEC TION 3, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.; 11-lEHCE SO UTH ALONG THE EAST llNE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 530 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION ; THENCE WE ST ALONG SA ID SOUTH LINE TO TH E CE NTERLINE OF 136TH AVENUE S.E .; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO THE CENTER LINE OF con CREEK PARKWAY S.£.; THENCE NORTHWE STERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF COAL CREEK PARKWAY S.£. TO THE NOR TH LINE Of SAID SECTION 3; THENCE lffST ALONG SAfO NORTH UHE ANO ALONG THE NORTH l [NE OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH , RANGE 5 EAST, w.M. TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTE R OF SAID SECTIO N 4; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID ScCTl(ll 4 TO THE SOUTH EAST CORNER PARADISE ESTATES N0 .2 AS RECOR DED IN VOLUME 102 OF PLATS, PAGE 31, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE o~ SAID PLAT AND ALONG THE SOUTH llNE OF PARADISE ESTATES AS RECORDED lN VOLUME 95 OF PLATS, PAGE 93, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARADISE ESTATES; THENCE NORTH AL°"G THE WE S, LINE OF -6- f ..:. a) ....0 0 C ~ 0 King County Water uist ri ct No. 107 legal Description 440 Gr adient Service Area Page Seven SA ID PLA T AND AL O~G THE NORTflERL Y E XTENS JrlN T .. E REOF TO THE NORTHERL Y MARGIN OF S.E. 95TH WAY; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SA!D NORTHERLY MARG JN TO THE EA STE RLY LINE OF THE WE STERLY 122 FEE T OF TRACT 387 OF C.D . HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTO N GARDEN OF EDEN DIVI SJON N0.6 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS , PAG[ 84. RECO RDS OF SAID CO UN TY; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE AND ALONG THE NORTHEASTERlY EXT£NSION TH ERE OF TO THE CENTERLINE OF GENS!NG AVENUE; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO TH : EA~T LIN E OF THE SOU THWE ST QUARTER or SEC TION 33 . TO',INSH!P 24 NOR TH, RANG ·. 5 EAST, W.M.; THENCE NORTH ALON G S/1!0 EAST Ll NE TO THC NORTH Ll NE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUll.. 'ER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTE R OF SA!O SECTION 33; THErl CE WEST ALONG SA1D NORTH LINE TO THE WE ST LINE OF SHORT PLAT N0.978054 AS RE CORDED UNDER KI NG COUNTY AU DIT OR 'S FILE N0 .8004280 74 4; rnrncE SOUTH '1.LONG SArn WE S1 LINE TO TH( NORTH LINE OF TKE RlGHT- OF-WAY OF Tiff ABANOQN[O PAC! Fl C COAST RA! LROAD; THEN CE WESTER LY ALON G S/\10 RIGHT-OF-WA"f TO THE WE ST L!Nt 0~ SA ID SECTION 33; THEN CE NORTH ALO% SAI D WE Si LINE TO TH E NORTH MARGlN OF S.E. 91S T STREET. BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNF.R OF Tiff BOUII lY OF WA TER O!STRJCT NO .107 ACCORDlNG TO RES OLUTION N0.332; THENCE FOLLO~!NG THE BOUNDARY OF WATER OISiR ICT N0.107 IN A GENERAL NORTH:lE STER LY DIRECTION THROUGH SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANG[ 5 (AST, W.M. TO TH E SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QU ARTER or THE NORTHWE ST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 32; THENCE t.lE ST ON THE SOUTH LINE or SAID SUBOIV!SJON TO THE WEST LINE OF TH E EAST 180 fEET OF SAID SU801VI S1 0N; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 32; THENCE WEST /\LONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE [NNER HARBOR LJN: ON -7- ---• 1 ,. King Cou nty Wa•.er District No.107 Lega 1 Jescri pt ion 440 Gr~dient Service /lrea Page eight THt: EAST SHORELINE OF LAKE WAS HING TON; TH ENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID INNER HARBOR LINE TO THE CENTERLINE OF PRIMARY STAT[ HIGHWAY N0.2; THENCE EA ST ALONG SAID C[NTERLINE TO TH£ POINT OF BEGINNING. . _,_..,_'"""""_' ----:11s:md111t1111' ... ··.·,.1·--··,vj~ ~--. . ..... __ ~·, '*1• .,~--. ~ ~ . ~! o f I ( . .) ;, '?"·l-. s. • ·,. ,_ ;.•t. ~~i~~~·~.'1t.olllM.~· .... i~1 r, ·>.J,, ·:.:.-~!f.;(1."1. "'l' · •'•H'T ' ,. -:. · 'tr~min-, r::·d, ·~:.-.~·A... ,1 .. i , ,. .. r .. ::··1t,:.: .. ,f -~.;;..,.-:-· "! .. :., "."";':.:.. ., ,;.··. -,~ · .. ~.l :-.:· ., ~. ·.i ·;r' . r .. .. :_ -: ,: '' ,~ 1 1 :tn.: 1c; h~ :)irt..':';-, .'·~-ti. ".'.Lo: t ..• · 'f{~ .• •.''-'! .,'P.·-n.tnf _ r1> ,,i,e :-;·,1u : · r,i,~tiJ 1~ \. ... • .~ .. "J... . ··,;-· ,: : J, I. .. ' uU; ~:·-j : ,, ,, i ,L ·~ .. "·.-· .,r._.-,. ··- -~ -.... "P .......... .. . '-c\ -· _·.-. . -.J!~~~:W-~:::.....:... ~-.. :.,,_ c~.m · . 'l'. -·~·c:ii , .~\.?.C ;_~~n~, ~lf;vt),L':.,:.-:t "l --~~.-~"..~~ . .,'!" 1"YO~t.j \.''' i."1:) '.-! ' ··:i ; ..... 1.l :· ... -.- r l I C'11 unty qf ~ .,,. Oit lhv. ck:l y ,,f {. - ··. ____ ............... . ·------·- -.4391 Bll121 1'be peat.or, .. 1117 Tllr • QJeaiql OOrporaUon, • corpore- t1on, tor and in eonaidereUon ot th• a.a ~t 0.. Dollar ($1,00) and other good Ind ftluabla cona14eret1on1, 1n band paid, receipt whereot 11 beNt>J 1c1mo1tle4pcl, 4o MNIIJ grent, .. 11 •nd conwy to Pupt Souad Potter a: Lipt CalllPellJ, • corpo.Ntlon, ita 11ucces- 11or11 and 1111gna, I pai.aoent ea .... nt to;r, a pc,.-er line over arx! •arose thi fol~lng de1crlbld Nil propart7 altuatad in King County, Waah1ngt~n, to-wit: 1'bat por-tioo ot Ooftnaent Lot 5 , 3ect1on 29, Townah1p 24 H Range 5 E, \LN., and adJlcent 11hoJ"e landa ot the second claee in front thereot l.Jing Vl:, or th.e lk>rtllti"II l'lc1t1c Rlil-.ay Cc.pan.,•, rlpt-ot-wa7, daacribed 111 tollow11; Beginning at the quarter-corner or the S line ot eai.d Section 29; thence N 89•58•)6" Ii •lon& the s lint or Yid Lot 5, a dllltance or J.113.vl' to toe Ill:, Um ot aald lk>l'thern Pscitle R.allla8y Coapen;,•a right-ot-•1; 'hence N 29•4-4 1 S4" E' Uong said righ't- ot-••1 111111, 9'9,63 t11t to an iron pipe which point le the true po1r:;t ot beglnnlng; thence S 29• 44 '54" w a long t.he ;; ly llne ot tne Jfortt>ern Pac1t1c Rll1bay Cclipeny 1 11 right-or-way lO~l.01'; thence• 59•2••36" 'II 100.01'; thence H 56•28•50" F lU .16 1 to I point troa which tbe true point or beginning b .. rtl S 59•2• '36" E a ~1at.anct ot 50'; thence S 59•24 '36" F 50' to the tNe point ot btginn~ng; subJect co the following t el'llo and conditl~n a : 'nlat ealo po•er lints shall be conatr-ucted and o~erat.ed at such a helgtlt as to no•. !n- tert'eN wlth th, 1nai.lllt.1on and o pen1tlon or a epur r111lroad track over and acroae the above p r operty an<1 /or the operation of steam cral)(:11 in conrl*ctlon therewith, provided that &aid power llnea 1hall no't be required to be conetructed IIO~ than eeventl - t'lve (75) reet above ground level; that grentee •~ea to cor,- atruct no perwenent atruct.urea on the atV->ve deacr1~d real 1-,rop- erty but ln 'the event that power pole, ire requin:d t.o be co,,- atructed, then aald P<>l•• lhlll l>e conatructed along the e&sterly a1rgln or the above deacrlbtd property . DAffD thia tu. day or --~----, 1)63, et 1-laaar<>l ia, J. --S!1fl f:. conn•& 04 tt119 ~ -t,f __ .... a;=----• 1963, Mf_.. M, t.LWDI ... L'.L ..... ... • knOWI! to bit tbe PNaiMnt aad tr r 1 , to • ;...,.ot1.ely, or the oorpONtion ti.\ .,..._ .. ·f~1ac lMt...-..nt, and acknellledald the said ~ tie le tbl . , ... •• •olun~r, act and deed or .. id corpoftUOO, tw ~ UNa and pwopo•• therein •ntloned, and Oil oetll ~ ~·: '1le1"" autboritad to encute tbe .. 1d 1natnaaat and thet tbe ... 1 aru:iied 11 ';be corponte ... 1 or eal4 ~11111 . . VI'N!SS NY IIAII> HD aJ9!nlL SUL bllNto aftlud the day and ,.ar f1:rat abow written. ... i.,, .... ; ... ~>• :,1<, •• 1 fl!/\ ... ....... ., s-lo , ..... c--, . IOIIII A. lolOal~ ~ ... l _ _....;.·-·--··£ 5811320 The under,1\;ned Grantor, it• heir•, succeaaora and a81i g na, (hereinafter togetl>er referred t.:-.;a •or.,,tor• >. tor and in con- sideration of the IIUID of Dll1 ti IIQ/100 P9W,\M l$l0.Q~) and o ther valu.sble eon111 ueration, the raeeipt. of which 11 hereby acknowledged, he~by cor.vey, and grMtl to th• MVlllICIPALI'l'Y 0.1" METROPOLITAN SEA'i"n.E , it• aueceaao r11 and aa&1gna, (he~inAfter together referred to .u "MUNICJP...X.Ir. '}, a pemanent eaae-nt over, aero es, along, in, ~..x>n and under the following je1cribfld property: h po rtion u£ Gvvernrncnt Lot 5, s~ction 29, Township 24 North , Ra 1.9 e 5 East, W.M., King ':ounty, Wash i ngton, sai<1 po;-tion being a s trip o f land 10 feet in ,..•.-.th lyin,:-5 fe•t on each side of the tollowin~ described center line: Beg inning at a point on the south line of Government Lot 5 at the intersection o f said south lir,e with the weet line of the night of way of ~~e Northern Pacific Railway ecr.µ;iny; ~hencP. North 29 44 ' 54 " East 8 S4 .fi2 feet algng said west line to the True Point of Beginni1 g; tnence North d9 24'36" Meat to point of re:nn.in us on a !ine which bears South Sf 28 '50" weet from a po int on said west line of the Right of Way of the Northern Pac ific Railwa:• Co,,,pa ny distant 195 .01 feet norther l ~· along said west line from the True Point of Be ginn!r.g. Said easeme nt btin~ for the purpose of installing, cor.struccing, oper 1tin9. maintaining, removing, repairing, replacin g and using a sewe r line with all eon,,f'r:tiona, manholes and appurten~nces thereto , together with the r ight of ingress to and egreas from sald de scribed property fo: the f~regoing purposes . By accepting and recording this easement, MUNIClP~.LITY covenag ts as follows: l. MUNICIPALITY sha~l upon completion of any construction of any f a cil ities de6cribed herein, rer:iove al l debris and re store the sur face of the above-described property as nearly ae possible to the condition i n which 1c existed at the date of this ag reemen t. ~-MUNICIPALITY agrees to indemnify and save harml ess Grantor from and against a.,y and all damage to the above-described proper ty or any building located thereon at the date of this agreement, ar l ,ing ouc of the construction , ope ration, maintenance, repair and r~placement of the facilities described above . 3. All right, t•~le and ,nterest which may he used and enjoyed without 1nterferi·19 with the easelll8nt rightll nerein conveyed are reserved to the Grantor. ~e construction, inetall~tion or main- tenance , after the date of this •greemen~. of str~ctu~ee ol a per- manent nature wi thin the above-<ie .. cr!Ded easemf'<nt shall be deemed an interference with said easemen t r i 9hte and as to such structur es the provisions of Paragraphs 1 lll'ld 2 hereof shall not apply . 4. MUHICIPALITY agrees to provide extra-1tren9th pipe aero•• the Grantor's pro perty to protect the pipe ahould a railroad spur be routed through this area. Orantor 1hall have the right to u,e the above-described prop! rty for roadway purpo1e1 and to uiprove the 1urface thereof by paving ~ny t ime after JIily l, 1965, I n the event th•t repair or replacemen~ of the abovo-de1cri.bed facilitie1 by MUNICIPALITY -1- t V('I 4oou fAU :~ ,.-,. damage& the roadvay surface , N\1NICIPALI1Y agreee, tollowing cooipletion of suc h repair or repla~n t, to reetore 1aid sur!ace as n?arly as practicable to ~h~ condition in which it ~xiete d pri or to said repair or replacement, ALSO, Grantor hereby cor ·,eys and grants to MUN ICIPALl 'i'Y a temporary cone t nic tion eaeO!'lllen t acroea , along, in, C'Yer, upon and under t~e foll~ing dee~ribed property · A str ip of l a nd 40 feet in Width lying 20 feet on each side of the center line deecribed i n th~ ~rnianent ea~ement above , EXC£P'r a ny portior. thereof lying within said permanent u asemPn t. ALSO , a strip rf lar;d 15 feet in wic'th, the: no,th line of said sLrip being des~ribed ao follows, Beginning at a point on the We st L ne of the r i ght of way o• t:1e Nortrern P.ic if~c Railway Company distant 849 .62 feet no r:.her1y alor.g said westerly line f r om tl-.e intersect.Loo of. ~aid -;:~~r;~0 ;;~;6~i~s~h~O~~~~ t!!~et~f~~v;~~~~i~to~1a!~1~~~ng of the no rth line of said lS-foot-widg strip of land being here in descr ibed ; thence continulnq North 59 24't6" We st 480 feet to termir.us . Sai: eases1ent being for the purpose of using the above-described ~rea during construction and installation of a sewer l ine with all connection s , manholes :t.nd appur.tenances thereto on the adjoin- ing o r adjacent property hereinbe fore described in the per111anent easement, together with the right of ing -0 ~ to and egr ess from said described property for the foregoin~. poses. By accepting and record1ng this easemenl, MUNICIPALITY covenants as fol l ows: l. MUN ICI PALITY shall upon comp letion cf ~onstruction of any faci-ities described herein, and upon the completion of any repalrs to any such facilities fol l owing conatruct ion , remove all debris and restore the surface of the above-described pror,erty as nearly as fOSs1b le t o the co~dition in which it existed at the date of this agreement. 2. MUSICIPALITY agrees to J :'ld emnify a .. J save '>atmless Gran . or from and against ~ny anJ all damage to the a br~e-described ~·o~-erty or any building located thereon at the date Jf this agreeMent. arising "Ut of the const ruction, operation, maintenance, r epair ,\n ; replacement of the facilities desc ribed above. } • This tempora r y cnr,struct.lon easement shall Cc»Mlenct: .u;d be in e~fe~t on thu date of this instrument and sha1~ terminat e on tie date a c tual ~se of said easement area shall terminate or upnn July l 1965, whichever date shall first occur. 4. Payme n t for said tm,porary constructio n easement shall be made at the rate of PlVE & N0/100 iX>LLA.RS {S 5 .00) per calendar ~eek, or frac tion thereof, that said temporary cons truction e aseme nt area io in actua1 use by MUNICIPALITY . Paynient shall be made on or before the la3t day of the c alendar month ••cceedi ng th~ c alendar month wh~n said te~porary constru~tion eaae ... nt area 1a in actual use. ,. Actual use as used in thie cemporary construction eaeement sh~ll be con&trued to include only the period from the etart of con structJon of said se~~r line in th• abov.-de1cri~d tempora ry construc tio n ease - ment area until coraplet1on thereof including reconstruction of fenci ng 'nd curbing and resurfacing of 1Joproved areas . -2- . ______ ,.. __ _ ~ ..... ,,,.. 'f '-"'·""· .... - ~~ .1lQSl,,;d datJ'\0V i_J..,.:l ..... :.a. ..... .;.;;;;;;;.;..;;.r ____ • a64. • • l, •• Bn.t.Y 1'AR IUD) <JDIMICAL COJl.fORATIOlf (I.Jf; I '-- STATE OY INDlAfllA COUNTY OP --'IW!=-=-Ia=-1------ On this~ day of No -ber , i 964, '.>efore roe the uncleraigned, a Notary Public 1n and for the State J f Indiana , duly ccaaiaeioned and svorn, peraonally appeared P. r.. RtillY and R. J 1 V.chll.er -------' t o rne known to be the Pneidant and S.eret.a'I respectively, o f the RBILLY TAil AllD CBEMICAL COIU'ORATION, the corporation that executed tl'.e for99otng in1trU11ent and acknowledged the said .natrW110nt to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporati:>n for the uae1 and purposes thenin l'llllntioned and on oath 1tated that they were authori~cd to execute the sol.id i nstru- ment and •hat the seal affixed 1a the corporate seal of sai d c orpora- ti.on. WITNE 3S the ".l ay > a n -l . :'I".. 1,1.dl .. Re«,.d /1., " 1t vv 11 1 ; ,_, -l· •-•ol-·o IOIIU I< MOUIS. C_, A,,J;io, ·-.. () . . , . ) I ti ., ·) LEAS£ THIS LEASE, made and entered into this 1st ddy o[ Jul.y, 1974, by 11nd between QUENDJ\1,L TERMINALS, a Joint Venture of PUGET TH:OER COMPANY and ALTrNO PROPERTif.S, INC., hereinafter rcfcrrecl to as Lessor, and •rURBO ENERGY LEASING, INC., a co rporatjon, herein·fter r"ferred to as Lcsc;cc . W I T N ~; S S ~ •r _!! : For and 1n con~1deration of the mutual covenants herinafter set forth , the parties hereto do hereby a~rec as follows: I. l~~_E~M!SES: The Lessor c10es hereby lease and dcm1se unti I the Ll)ss~c those <'erla 1n premises silualed 1n K1ny County, washing~on, descr ibed as follows: See .. ttached Exhib1 t "A" incorrorat<'d he r ein by reference. The Lessor h as already entered into various leases conce rning port ions of the above-described premises. Copies of these leases are attached to and incorporated herein by reirrence. '!'his Lease is subJect lo and subordir.ate to those pr lOt leases and all ct.her <•ncumbrilnces on property . Lessor hereby assigns lo the LesseP thr Le3sor's right s under said \cases, and Lesse~ hereby as~umcs illl obligati ons of L~ssor under said leases and agrees t o indemnify and hold Lessor harmless for any l 1ab1lity a r ising out of those subleases . In the e vent of termination of this Lease for -1 - :t a a r I :j ' ·1 I I :i ., 1; jl J. ! . i •' ( 11 ii l j ,j· 11 11 il. I I: I . I I I . I I . d~ ' ' •:J' (. any reason whatsoeve r, the ~ssignment of the subleases s hall becomn immediately null and void and Lessee thereafter shall have no interest whatsoever in said sublea~es. In addition, all new subleases shall be assiqned illllllediate ly by Lezsee to Lessor. 2. TERM: The tenancy cr~atcd herei~ is a month- to-month tenancy conuuencing with the date of this Lease. The tenancy may be te rm inated at 'any time by either party upon thirty (30) days' written notice sent to the other party by certified mail at the respective addresses desiy .. ated herein . The Lease may be terminated for any reason whatsoever or for no reason and there shall be no requirement wha tsoever of good c,,use or good faith us justification for any termination of this I.ease. 3. RENT: The Lessee agrees to pay Lessor as rental he r ein, fi f ty (50%) per cent of all rentals received Ly Lessee under any subleases, including bul not limited to the subleases attached hereto and assigned herein, and any future subleases of any portion of the leased prem i ses whatsoever. Rental shall be paid to Lessor by Lessee immediately upon receipt. The Lessee agrees to us e its best efforts at all time to maintain the premises fully subleased at the best rate of return the Lessee is able to negotiate . All future subleases of the premise~ shall be subject to the prior written approval of the Lessor, wh ich approval .~hall not be unreasonably withheld. Lessor shall have the right to inspect Le5see's books of account rPlating to this Le, -2- ~ f ~ . -·-----------------~ ./ I u l .. :1 ii !! d :1 I• i' 11 i l J! I ' i ' I I :1 I• I I I I f' I . ~I 7 . 'i I \ at any time. In addition to the rental stated above, the Lessee shall pay as additional rental one -half (1/2) of a\l taxes (u, ,,k,. <"'l',f/)1~: /. '•/ ((r ,~• .·, I on the p remises~and expe~ies in main taining the premises~ ,,·, 4. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS AND ORDINANCES: The Lessee herein covenants and agrees that it will comply with a lJ the applicable tel'.'ms, ordinances, rules, laws and regulations governing the use of property herein demised as provided by the State of lvashington, the United States Governrn enl , 3nd appropriate municipal agencies, includi ng without limitation of the generality thereof all laws and ordi n ances and regulations enacted under the Shoreline ManagcmenL Act and the W-shington St ate Environmental Pro- tect i on Act. 5 . LIABILI1'Y FOR D/\MJ\GE : The Lessee assumes all risk of damage to persons or properties incurred by reason of this l,ease and it agrees it shall promptly pay all costs incurred in connection with a ny damage to any and dll persons or property that it is legally responsible for, and Lessee further agrees that it shall indemnify and save Lessor harmless from any and all claims for damag~ arising (rom t he exercise by Lessee of the privileges lawfully granted by Lhis LPasc. The Lessee further aqrees that it shal l secure and retain in force liability insuranc~ policies in the minimum amount of SJ,000,000.00, together with ~dequate fire insurance naming Lessor and Lessee as co-i nsureds according to their respective interests. The Lessee shall p rovide the -]- p ..... ii ,I I I I I' i i, I = • . ! -. ! ;; -u lo :I 'l 'I :1 " i !· ,. I I I i .I 11 I I i I I I l ~, lJ ·1 I ·1 . , ll'- ~ II l (_") a.) 0 -J r Les s or with ce rtifica tes ev ide nc ing s uch insur~nce coverage. /Ill insurance policies ·shall be subject to the prior writt en approval of Les s or . 6. A SS1<,;NMEN 'l_'.: The Le &see shall not a ssign any of its rigM s uncl e r thi s r.ease, nor sublet any porti on of th e leased premises wi thout first obtaining t h e writ t en consen t of the Lessor, but s u ch conse nt sha l l not be un- reasonably withheld. 7. INO EMNIFlC/ITION AND lNSURJ.I.N CE: Lessee ngrees that Le ssor or its agents shall not be he l d l i able for any dD ma ge to the Lessor 's or Lessee 's property, o r a ny personal injury to any person c ausecl by defects now in the premises, o r h e r e after occurring on the premises or operation s of Le ssor or Le s see . Lessee agrees to inde mn ify and hold Le s s or , Lessor's employee5 and/o r agents, who l ly harmless Crom any dam a ges, claims, demands or suits by any person or persons inc luding Lessee arising out of any acts or omtssions by Lessee, tts agents, s e rvant s or emp l oyees arisiny as a r e sult o f any act i vity done. In addition, tl,e Le ssor has in c onnec tion with th o issuan<.:e or cross i ng permits with Bur- J i n~ton Nor t hern Ruilro ad, agreed, among other things, as follows: "9. Permittee s hall and hereby docs release and discharge. Rail r oad o( and from any and all liabil i ty for damage to or de s truction of said roadway . or any p r operty o f Permittee thereon; and shall and her eby does assume any and a l l liability f or injury to or d e~th of persons, o r loss o f o r damage to proper ty in any manner a r ising from or du r ing the use, maintenance , repair or removal of said r oadwa y, however such in j ury, death, loss, ctamage or destt·,i ..:tion -4 - ·-;: ..... --·: --,, 1 ~ ! I .r I , .. II I •• • I !t l ' ,; ,1 I< r 1 ~ ; a :· l ft ll II i I I! I ,I it ji p • I I ·- I '. I - I: I I · 1 ,- I : u I• ! 'ti I'. afores~id may occur or be caused; and ~hall and hereby does indemnify and save har~less Railroad of and from any and all claims, dema nds, suits, actions, damages, r~coveries, jud<J111ents, cost s or expenses arising or growing oul of or in connection with ~ny such inJury, death, loss, uamaqe or destr•iction afo resaid. Permit tee furtl-,er agrees t o appear and defend in the nam~ of Railroad any suits or actions at law brought aqarnst it on ac<·ount of any such personal injuries, death o r damage to property, and to pay and satisfy any final judgment thilL may be rendered against the Railroad ~n a ny such suit or action. Tlie liability assumed by Permittee herein shall not be affected ~r diminished by the fact, 1f it be a fact, that any such suit or action brought aga:ns'.: Railcoad may arise out of negligence o f natlroad, its officers, agents, servants o r employees, o r be contributed to by such neglige nce . 1 0 . In the event Railroad shall requir<.> the u~e of its premises occupied by the said r oadway or any part thereof for any purpose whatsoeve r, or if Perm ittee shal l fail to keep <1nd perform any of the terms and conditions o f this agreement herein agreed by Pcrm1ttcc to be kept a nd performed, Railroad shall have t he right t o terminate this agreement ill any t ime upon giving t o Pcrmittee thirty (30) day~' written notice of its intention so to do and s h all, upo 1 expiration of said thirty (30) days , have lhe right to remove soid c rossin~ and barri- cade sa id roadway at the c ost and expense o f Permittee . Sai<l notice shall be good if served personally upon Permitlee or posted upon the premises or deposited po~t -paid in a Untted States Post Office, a ddre ssed to Perm i ttee at Perm it lec's Post Offi ce address above stated. Ho po rtion of any payments made hereunder will be refu nded upon termination of t his agreement . 11. Permiltee shall no t assign th is agreement or permi t any other person or persons t o use o r occupy any p ortion of the pre ~ises of Ra ilro ad occupie d by t he s aid roadway without first having obtained the written consent of Ra1lroad. -5 - .. -------------~---" . I I t. ~ '\ 'I ! I ~I I j j I ! I i ! ii I I 4 I ~ u ' ,I 'I, .. .. il ;i Ii 1: I l i l I: \' ' u ' : -:1" r- 12. This agreement shall inure to the benefit of and b~ bindinq upon the parties hereto and their respec tive executol~, administr ators, s u ccessors , a nd assigns." The Lessee specifically a9rees t hat any u s P o f sa id r ai lroa d crossing or future c rofisi n9 s hall be subject t o the ~r ior ,:;onsent of Bur ling ton Northern, a nd furth e r ngrces to i ndemnif y the Lessor for any l iability tu Burlin~· ·ton under th e above parag r aph as a r e sul't. o f any activities of Les s ee, its agents, assigns , visitor s, or a nyon e else corni ng onto the premises in f urth e rilnce of Lessee 's business o r at their d irection or with t h eir permission. 8 . INVOLUNTflR 'i f1SSIG NM£NT: 1'his Lease s h all not b~ s ub ject to 1~voluntary assi9 nment , tra nsfer o r sa l e, or to assignm ~n t, t ransfer or sale by ope ra tion of law in any manne r what soever by the L,cssee , and any s uch attempted involun t a r y as signm e n t, transfer o r sale s hall be void and o; no effect. The Lessor s hall have t h e r ight to assiqn its interests under this Lease without the pr ior consent of the Lcsset.: and upon i;uch assignment the assignee will become s olely responsible for any duties to the Le ssee hereund er . 9. F:FFECT OF BANKRUPTC Y: Withou t limi ting th e qener~lity of the p rovisions of the p r eceding sect i o ns , if a proceeding is under the Bankruptcy Act or· any ame ndmen t ·reto sha l l be comme nced by or agai nst the La s see, and, i f against Lhe Le ssee , such proceedings sha l l not be dismissed befor e either an adjudication 10 b ankruptcy or t he con for - mation of a composit ion , arrangement, or plan of reorgani- zation, or 1n t he even t t h e Lesse n is adjudge d insolvent o r -6 - --,~_ -~--... .1 'I J I ,: i : i . • i 1 .. i .. t ... <I 1· makes an assignmC!nl f or tl1c benC!fit of its credit,.,rs, o r if a rC!ceiver 1s appointed in any procecd inq or ac t ion to which the Lessee 1s o1 party, with a utho rity to take possession or control of the demised premises, and such receiver is not discharged within ,1 period of thirty ()0) d,1ys .:ifter his appointment, any such event or invo l u n tary .:issiqnmcnt pro- hibited by the provisions o( this Se~tion s hall Le deemed to cons ti tute a breach of this Lease by the r.cssee: and shall, al the election of Lessor, terminate this LPase and all rights ot a ny and all persons c laiming under the Lease . 10. W/1IVEl1 or BREACII: It is agreed that no •11a1vcr by either Lessor or J,cssee of the breach by either of any covenant, agreement, stipulation o~ co ndition of this Le;isc shal I be construed to be a waiver of any succeeding breach o' thr same covenant, d<Jreeme11t, st ipulati on or condition or d breach of any othcr covenant, agreement, I stipulation or condition; also that al l the rove nants, stipulations, conditions and agreements herein containPd shall extend to and be binding on the hetrs, executors, administrators, s uccessors and assigns of the parties hereto. 1 l. I MPROVEMENTS: ThC! Lessee shall nol make any alterations , additions or improvements 111 Lhe premises or equipment or facilities thereon , without Lhe consent of the Lesso r in wr iting first had and obtained, and all alteration s , additions and improvements shall bPcome the property of the Lessor , and shal l remain in and b<' surrenderPd with the premises a~ a part th<'rP.of at the termination of this l,eaS'?, -7- ·I I I l I ·1 ·1 •l '! ! I ! i II 'I I ,I· ,l I{ 11 11 Ir 11 !l' ! . i. 1 • Ii ,r Li I ,, .... -1 I" without dist u rbance, mol es t atio n o r injury, and free o f all mc:?c h,mi cs '. 1 ien s und encumbrances of any nature whats oever. ,~c cost of nil alterations, repa irs and improvement~ shall be split equal l y between Lessor and Lessee . l 2. TERMINATION OF 'l'HE LEASE : If the Lessor or the !,essc e' s use of the premises as curr ently understood, thaL ~s, to~ industrial tank storage purposes, sha l l be restrained or enjoined by judicial .process, ter!"inated by municipnl, Coast Guard or other government a uthority, ter- minated by la~ or terminated by the right of e minent domain, the l.essor may terminutc this Agreement on tcr, (10 l days' writ ten notic;c to the Lessee ,rnd shal 1 not be liable for any d.lJllagc whotsoevc r resulting f rom sa id termination . parties shall be bound by all exis Ung ei!Sements, agree111cnt s a nd encumbra~ces either of record, or specified here i n , or any others to which the parties have actual notice. H. DEFAULTS: In the event of any breach of this !,ease by the Lessee, the Lessor shall give written noticc to the Lessee of the specific default and shall provide in that written notice that the Lessee has ten (10) days in wh ich l o cure t he default or vaca t e the premises as provided herein. Rede livery of the premises to the Lessor shall in no wa ~, relieve the Lessec of any of its obligations to p~y rent or o ther obligations or liability for breach under thi s Lease. If the premises are relet by the Lcssor , the amounts re- ceived fr om the new Lessee sha ll be applied, first, to the payment of any e xpenses o f such relctting and of an J J ter;i- -8 - . i• I !i .. ,! .1 .I I I ! . I 'I ,; I i. I J I ·I r; I I I,· ' ~ !. l ~ Q ·i ll I' ! 11·, .. 1r Jr \ I ,, ~1 tions or repair necessitated by the default of the Lessee and subsequent r clett i ng; second, to the payment of rent due and unpaid hereunder, and the residue, if any, shall bP held by th•! /.essor and appl1ed tn payment. of futu['<! r<>11t as the s.:imc rnily become due and payable hereund<>r. No such re-entry 0r Laking possession of th e prem j s.-s by the Lessor shall be construed as an election on the part of Les,;o. to tcrminale this t,e..ise unl<'s,; a •,1ritten not1ce of such intent1on is q1ven lo lhe l.t's sc 0 , or unless the termination is decreed by a court of competent jurisdiction. Notwithstanding any such rclelling withou t termi nation, the Le~sor may at any time thereafter elect to terminate this Lease for such previous breach. In the event of breach, the L<'ssor shill have all rights µrov1ded by law. Specifically, Lessor may rr.covc r from Les see any and all ddma ges incurred or suffered by reason of such breach . 15. This Lease shall be construed according to the law,; of the Slate of Washingto:i . In the event of any litigation involving this Lease brouqht by Le ssor in which Lessor prevails, the Lessee agrees to pay on demand a ll costs incurred by the Lessor, including but not limiLed to al l attorney's fees and costs of title search. lG. All notice s under this [,ease s hi'.lll be sent to th e pd r tieo at th<> arldrPss~s indicated below unless other- w1 "e agr0,,<]. 17. This aq r cement contains th0 entire under- standin,1 of the part1, s and cannot be modified exr.~pt in writing, signed by ,111 parties her,...to . -9- ! l • ·I " ·t I L I j I I ~ I I, -' .. t ·1 I 1 :1 I I i, ,, :i II ,. I' i' i I. ! \ I I; I I I ! .• I i' , · I I : .I I · l .. u·· I :i .,, J. '~ (J-, "<T IJl -, cu .:, STATE or WASHINGTON) ) SS : COUNTY OP KI N G ) QUEND~~r, TERMlrALS By (JrA(,iJ ( )1tri.~-- --d~ald 0. 'Nurman, Manc1ger P. 0. Box 477 Renton, Washington 98055 TU RBO ENERGY LP.ASING, INC. .,W,e~ pt , Dtr-AJ7 "Y (' /. ~. £~I#~_ 1;/ ..J-<t < r < lj,; I ( Plaza 600 Building Seattle, washinqton Onthis_!!:_dayof ft!w-<A fr, , 1974, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared DONALD O. NORMAN, to me known to be the Manag er of QUENDALL 'l'ERMINAI,S, t h e Joint Venture that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said Joint Venture for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and c1 oath stated thal he is a uthorized to execute the said instrument on behalf of said Joint Venture. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above wr~fen. • ~ ;-;/ /) i V •' .,, I ' • • ~ (.Notary Public in and for. th~;5~ , .• f1.'• i •0 '.,.0 [ i;ashington, residing a£.-H, ·:,· ... ; .· •'\,., i . , .... l A> •. "'. :~) ~ ~ .. "' I -10- II !f ,, •I ,I ., •i ,, ., I' • ~ ' ;.; . " STATE OF WASHINGTON) J SS: COUNTY OF Kl NG ) 0n this I Z. day of ~ , 197 4, before me, the undrnig n ed, a No~ublic i n and f·or the State of Washington, ~~ corrunissioned and sworn, pr.rsonally appeared f;:'s,.-;,q,tp C. I£~ wi&tf"!tTllnd JA"!'\ W[ A "J./01..l",.t,.J to me known to be the President and Secretary, respectively, of TURBO ENERGY LEASING, INC., the corporation that exec ut e d tht! foreyoing instrument, and acknowledge d the said instru- ment to be the free and vol untary act and deed o f said c orporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that t h ey are authorized to execute the s aid instrumen t and that the sea l affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS ,n y hand and official seal hereto a ff j xed .t .he day and y ear first above wr itten . /';~~-~:·<~?··,:~\ _ _:J(/r;,c: //,-;,', 'f</: £/· · ·.' .'_i~ Notary Public i n and 7for the St ate of .. ~ ~. Washington, residing at _;,-,, r-50: ~ l '. -11- I I •I !i 'I :/ i I t I [ I :: -.. ! L D 1 l 'l .. 'I i i · 'I ,. ,I i ! i: j'. I 1 I I I 1 · I I. • i I t ~ I I -, ,. CJ' -.q- li) ) c;) ,::) ~r ,. i:;:: II . ' , r• -·1:l .: ·, J:°"t ,,.1 o (;p·_,",...n.,11 nL i:J~ ·, i 1 S·.c t.i o,1 ~9, '1·<' ·, ,di;-> 1, :.J:.·r 1 , !~.J n;,;C! '> l.1 ,I, H.:i. ,""l•,,j f-!l->1s1•- I f"' 1 .:1,'J" ilin~ l y{nJ. l.'•·sr.:e::-)1 o; rh, .. r.r,rr~1 ··,1 ;, 1,·i ··;1_ !' 1Ll f11 :!d Pi~·,'1t o.: '.-l;rt\' .-tn·l Sr,'.1 '·h ···I: o f ., Ii· ·I -,1,..(! ;i•; fol lo·.,;· ih· ~~n:-'.it. ~ :i~ Lh '~ q'l1 7 t c r rc;1-rl.!1· nri t"ii , .. ~~<,1 )' i, l i r1.• of ·; 1 \_,l S,:, t·=o, 'Jtj, .. lv.>r!r.:C! ~:c:·r· 8'}053 • )(1" l·:r:•;1 .tlri.,; t:'.J Su,ith I uH, u' .,.•id 1.o. '.i l, 11 LOI lt·r·r r-r, h , .-1'.,,;•t·rly l i ne of ,;·,id ;:v ,l hC'rl' ",dri , f'!ifr'.'0;1 i V.i;:t,:. o" \·.',!/; th0nc 1• :!1:",rrh t<J'>.-.!.'','1" i-:; ;: :;t,'I ()/. ;,.,,, ,l 1 CliL' •·;1\_c) ~.,.•h' Of ~Jf\'' 1 111,• I() :1 j1'1L!l 1 '1 "(1•i11 1 !'tP ;:' f1 1 r(·1·r,,d f~ ,'t ': Point ti.; f'!l ;H.I' .:·0~1· i '-: '.\{ t:ntth 'l'JO/•l~'"',1," 1·>•;1 /00.01 r ·~i~ r ,, ( ' ' . 'I • ~l o j rL (J f h ', i 011 j fl.°~ 0 f I. J1 l i t h 11 ·•I H l" I d -•:(", j J .. r l ; LIH·n· .! S")'it'h J',0/ ;11;'1" 1,!c•.':L ;1 ·r1 . .JI f t,, :1 ,·.,i 1· \ ·,·rh b,•.1(·: "•.lrl l ·,r)'J Jl,')"1 • •• 1·">l LV 1 J •;j J ,... .",·ff, ;.1_·.I l1n i n1 :\, 1 i11.',1t'<· ·:.n ·t l ·1·J0 11,' ,r-.. t ,•:,l to , 1·· -~~ ,.· i ,,. l,nr Jin . .;:!·id c:i1 , <·tu! uf :;:1·;,1 Ii, · d, .. , ., i;,; J :),I, .i\l~,{J li,·d w,r! ir,:: 1>'. ',.·ti•J C:;r1r•rr 1:t~·'1I I.of ·, I ·=,1 •• ~;.l' '~. ··· :· <·'"1j' 0 1· l ·•':c· 1./."!~:h!.ll .. t.011 l',n dt•·.· tt' ~'· ,'l'··t·, o: !:r•vo" .:•r··: SI!.~· H; .. _!1'·1<11 .:1:"'t·, . .'·\ ;1,,J .:,r tf1•;1>~:·c·1 l'j (,r (1H. IU;~h1 oi \1 1/ (1 Pt·1 ,li, :-·,.,.,. 'li .~1,.,.,'/ 1:ur:1h ,,,. I 1· .. c.1 ,~,li!·~:;.l ?1'/ d .. , d , ..... ;,··.l:01 'i\1 !\..0 '.· ,\\\d i!<11', i-'i! .. : :·n . J!,;·;.''i I { •• • ' •r . I I· i i I ! I i I :I I :[ I l l. I i r . "'f' . ..-. l ) C\l n .... ... a: w "' . "' N 0 0 .............. t?H ~i 8 PM 12 40 OlllECf t',f!° RECoRDS t. EL£0 Tt0tl~ K 1i:~ CCUPl°l"f, WASH. [ ·l . ·-··-----------------..i~ i .. r - fl II jf ·, .I ' :j I I, .! ....__ QUIT CLAUI DE.ED THE GRANTO}!. REILL'l TAR A),10 CHEMICAL CO~.RATION, an Indiana corporation, for and in consideration of TEN DOLLA.RS (Sl0.00) and other v aluable consideration conveys and quit claims to QOENDALL TFO!UNALS, a ~oint Venture c~prised of Puget Tilllber, Inc., a Washington co-t:;>oration and Altino Properties, Inc., a Washington corporation, the following described rea l estate , s ituate in the Co11nt.y of King, State of Wa sning ton, That porti o n of Government Lot 5 in Section 29, Township 24 North, Range 5 East, ~.M. and shore land adjoining lying We sterly o~ the No rthe r n Pacific Railroad Right of Wa y a nd Sout he rl ; o f a li~E described a s fol l o ws : Bcg1nni:,•, at t~.e q uarter corner on the Sou:,, line o f sa 1d Section 29 ; t hence ~orth 99°58 '36" we s t along the Sout h line of said Lot 5, 1,113.01 feet to the Westerly l i ne of said Nc rthern Pa ci fic Railroad Ri gh t o f wa y: .hence North 29°44 '54 " East 949.62 feet al o ng s aid Right of Wa y line t o~ point herei nafter referred t o as Point A; thence conti~uing North 29°4 4'54 " East 200.01 feet to the true point of beginn ing o f the line herein described; thence South 56°2E'SO" West 222.3 2 fe e t t o a point whi ch bears North 59°24'56~ West 100.01 feet from s aid Po i n t A; thence ~lorth 59° 24 '56" West to th"1 inner harbor line and the e nd o~ said line description; Also that por tion of sa i d Government Lot 5 l yi ng Southeasterly of La ke Washi ngton BoulevarJ, Weste rl y o f Secondary State Ht ghw a 1 Number 2A and No rthwesterl y of the Right o f Wa y of Public State Highwa y Uwnber las established by <eed r ecorded under Auditor 's f ile No. 5687 408, containi ng 31 . 7 acres more or less (accuracy t o one acre ) o f which 12.8 acres a r e under.rater s horelands. TOGETHER with the f ol lowing: The Harbor Area Lea se dated the 30th day of '.,ovember , 194 3, between the Port of Seattle a nd Peter C. Reil ly for that area between the inner and outer harbor line~ lying adjacent to the area described above in Lake Washington. All rights a nd interest 1n and to that c e rtain lease between fos s Tug & Barge for booming and rafting of logs on Lake '.-ashington dated the 1 st day uf uecemt.t:r, 196.i, wtwci,n Re i l l y Tar & Che mical and Fo ss Tug & Barge. All rights and permits, if any, from the Army Corps of Engineers fo ~ p lacing and locating structures, wharves, dolphins, piers and other devices that ~re in interference with navigation and require permits from the Anny Co r ps of £ngineers located in that area described in the Harbor Area Lease referred to above . THE GRA.~TOR, REILLY TAR AND CHEMICAL CORP ORATION , war rants that 1t has not created any encumbrances on the subject property since the ,,._ .. ~---u.: .... \..~~---.. , .... ---...~-.. ·------, .... ,1111111, -··--...... 111rai-.111ttallltli·illt11M1111•·-·111i·1n1111r11r1111, .. m ... _______ , -, .-.......-.._. a... -• date of closing of the Real Estate Con tract betveen Granter and Grantee herein dated June 1;, 1971, but express ly disclaims any and all other warr~nties , express or implied. This deed is given in fu lfilllbent of that certain Real Es tate Contract between the parties hereto , date d June 15, 1971, and conditioned fo r the conveyance of the above des cribed property. and .the covenants of warranty h e r ein contained shall ?Y.>t ·apply to any title, interest or encl.:111.b ra:ice aris1.ng by, through or under the purchaser i n said con tract, and s~al l not apply to a ny taxes, assess-nents or other charge s l evied , assessed o r becoming due subsequent to the date of sa1.d contract. Real EsLate Sales Tax wa s µaid o n this sa l e under Rec . No. 1 4856 0 . I:-. WITIIE SS WHEREOF, s aid corporation has caused this ir.strWt1tnt proper _9 f f1ce r s a~d its co r porat~ se al t o be 10 r '-1 . J...2._ :la:· o f _ )1 l Ju,.-,--, 19: S . REr~L T~!'Hl2AJ. ,:ORPORATION By / ,J. j ~t¥~ y,u (jr esia,ft By ~E~'"~-Secretary STATE Of l'.'lDIA:,A ~s: C0ur1t"/ O f/~· -?1...,: ,I J On th1s _g day o f ·-Jk,----, 197S , pe c sona l ly a ppear ed ---,---~.L..-;:__.....,/ /J. ~,I atid £ E ,,,., , -4-I'A-n, , to me known LO be t h¥c)'res1dtnt and Secretary oT REILLY TAR AllD CHEMI CAL CO RPORATIO~. the 'corporat,on that executec the within and foreqoinq QU IT C I.AH'. DEED, and acl!,nowledged sai<l instrument to be the free and vo lunta ry act and deed of said co rporation, for the uses and p ucposes t~erein ~entioned, ~nd on oa th stated that they were authori z ed t o execute said inst rum ent and that t he s e al affixed is Lhc co rporate seal of s ~id cor;;orat ion . IN WITNESS WHERE OF , I have hereunlo set my hand and affixed my o ffi cla l seal the day and ye ar first above wr itten . v·· ·· : ·~ e· J'7c.? MyC :-,.. , · . J---. ,; !978 •:. "" V '-'• \, tJ "\,f•,_; ··--.. -~~ ........ --e seen Lt t'ltt? t n mt es '• no ... .,,, . rt+ 0 q n 0,. ... 0 • -J '•,, ;;ECORlic C, ••• _.GF •••••••. -•.•• RE011£S r 0~ .. 1J1l5 .U 16 PM I 3? C:R(CTC.'! R£COR0S 6. El£CTIOHS l<IHC CCUNTY, W4SH. ========-=--......__..._.__--............,~. on* en eene: > • tCO!O ttz · st ftrt __ ,. __ ................. .. __ ..._.. __ ..__..,.. ,i! ./ q . ' ·- . ,. -· ) ._J : .... J ) .... . , .- 1 -·., -. ·-, UTILITIES II EASE,'1EN T ~ I l tl IS I NSTRU11EHT. made this day of _______________ l 9j_Q_; Q.JENDl\l, 'l'ERol.INA!S, a . -- by a nd be.tween · joint vent.ure CC21prised of alt AI.TINO P!a'ERIES, INC., a washingtoo corporation, and ruGE'l' TIMBER, INC., a W;i5hiMton corporatia1 --.......:---------------- --;n,d---------------------------------------- hereina f te r called ·"Crantor (s)", an d the CITY OF RENTON , a Mun icipal Corpor .. tlon of King County, Washington , hereinafter cal led "Crantee". WITHE S SET H: That said Gran tor(s). fo r and in cohs ide ra ti on of the sum of $<Ale Dollar ($1.00)-~----------paid by Gr antee, and other va l uable consideration, do by ·these p resents, g rant , ba rgai n, sell, convey, ar,d warrant unto the sai d Cran ~ee, I ts successors and assigns, an easement for public uti lit ies (including wate r and s ewe r) with necessary appurtenance s ove r, th rough , across and upon the fol low ing described prop er ty in King County, Washingt on, tr0 re particularly descr1 bed as f ol lows: 'lllat p:,rtion of Governnent Il)t 5, Section 29, Township 24 North , Range 5 F.ast, \-1 .M., King Cornlt:y, washington, lying hesterly of the Northern Pacific Railway right-of- way (row Bur~ Northern) together with second class shoreland abutting thereon described ::is follows: caimenci.rg at the intersection of the South line of said Government_ U>t 5 wi tJ'I the Westerly lire of said railway right-of -\.<.:i~; thence North 30°55'53" Eas~: al~ said right-of-way line 435,00 feet to the true i:.·o.i.nt of beginning; thence North 68°44 '15" West 350:00 feet : thence South 21°15 '45 .. West 150.00 feet; thence North 66°44 '15 " West 15.00 feet; thence ·North 21°15 '45~ Eilst 265 feet:· thence South 68°44 '15" F.ast 15 .00 ft;!et; thence South 21°15 '45" West 100 feet; thence South 68°4.4 '15" East 352 .56 feet to the Westerly line o f said railroad right-of-way; the.11ce South 30°55'53" West along said Westerly line 15.22 feet t o the true point of °l:ieginning . '.'HIS, EASEMENT S II AL:;:.. ;....;ONTUTU E SO LONG AS THE WATER LINE IS MAINTAINED ON THE LOCATION STATED HEREIN . SHOULD SAID 1~1\TER LINE BE RE1,!0VED OR RELOCATED, THIS EASEMEN T WILL TERM .lNAIT IMMEDIATELY AND SHALL REVERT TO THE GRJ\NTOR A ND /OR HIS SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST . Grantor reserves the r i g ht to re l ocate or remove· said water lines at its sole discretion. ~ -.. , .. GT ,EQUIRED h:1;i Co. Reccr ds Di•tision :., 9 -,-d.'1( , Deputy p:(('C'f\r " 7cw: :-,, . J:11 7 II)/ ~M ·.,,. UEf l -1 , l..t. .. _._ .-:-. ••• __ ~ .. -~-. -----.., ~--' ... ~ ~~ ... -· ~ :,;. al f~ l. \ Said heretofore rrentioned grantee, its ~uc;:essors ·or assigns • .-shall have the right, without prior notice or proceeding 4t 1.w, at such ti"r,es as may be necessary" to l''"'ter upon said above described .proper\:( for .the ·purpose of· constructing, mai, .. aining, repairing, al ter1ng or reconstructing said utility, .or making any connecti.ons therewith, without incurring any legal ·Obligations-or liability therefore, provided, that such construction, main- taining, repa_iring, altering or reconstruction of s uch utility shall be acco~lished in such a manner that the pr-lvate :•ii rovements existing In the right right(s)-of-way s hall not be disturbed . or dam,,,ied, or in the event they are <Jisturbed or damaged, they will be rep1aced in as good a condition IS they were irmedi ately before the property was entered upon by the Grantee. The Grantor sh·a11 fully use ana ·enjoy the atore descr1bed ·premises, fncl u<iing the right to retain the right to use the" surface of said right-of-way if such usP. does not interfere with ins tal 1 at ion and ma i ntenance of the util lty line . However, the · grantor shall not erect bu i ldings or structures over, under or across the right-of-way durin~ the existence of such l!ti 11ty. This easemen t, shall be a covenJ11t running with the l411d and shall be bind- ing on the Gran for, his ·succe ssors , heir~ an d as signs . Gran tors covenan t that · they are ·the 1 awful owne rs of the above properties and that they have 3 91.10d and l~ful right to execute this ag1-eelll!nt. . ) >"«:',ZcV:// /b°a/"?a<c/>· and i V·· ·? /'7 ·(') R . . f:,q--~ ~--. ., , ,Jm.-x7r...,aii d r ;.;~ . 7 and •I , rl 1 . . -· t ""! .. --; .. -. ·,·f . \,, . "i ;. ~. ··,I:-, . -· ~ ST ATE OF WASHINGTON C.OLNT'i: OF .KI HG ss and I, the ·undersigned , a notary pub hc in and :for thee State of Wa s h1ngton, hereby certify that on thi s 2.l__day of ?tJ'?I 19 .. ..!!Q_ p_ers6nally appeared before me (/ . . · and R4,z(l.,4,JL.,....__ ·W-ei 4e" e,i q.14 • .,1,.fYk1+>+¥£{1 and ~-_,, -c, · and ; and . _ . ;---.:-to=--=me:-:-;r::n:-:01t11--:::-n-:t:-:o-c-~1-=-n-:ir.,,"T::1:-:-ua:-,·rr.:-s.r-:=s~cr=""""J" in' and who exec_uted the foregoi~lnstrurrent , ·and ackno,,,ledged · that-..:;:c;,,:ll...._,· :,----'-- si!J)ed 'and sealed the s~ as .!1(_-4 free and vol .untary act an.: ~d for the uses and purposes therein mentioned . :-iLED for ftooord at R.wu~ I}· -····-,~-. ~ ~-. .-,.,) . ~ .., :. ·.r-,' . :__~-" L -~-... ., = \ I ... ··-.. · .... ;·v .•. . . . . . . ·.. . . . -~ ~ . . . .·,.. . ..· .... '-·~ . '· .. :.. ..... : :· ··:\.-·. ~ ... ·~. ""'"""·--· --r-··-------. . :{-.. ':t (") ("') .n 0 :0 (\J ::> c() /J ASSIGNMEN T OF LEASES AND CASH COLLATERAL T IIJ S ASSIGNMENT OF LEASf:S AND CA;,11 CUl,LATERAI, (herein;,.fter referred to as the "Assignment") is made by and between DOUGLAS E. McKEEN and OLIVE S. McKEEN , husband and wife (here~nafter jointly and Reverall y referred l~ as the "Assignor"); and O'DOtmELL, BRIGHAM & PARTNERS -NORTHWEST PROPERTIES, a general partners hip. RFCOf:OF'.1 1 '"' · · fni lti H 19tiH'8 : WI t NESSETH: 3··Tl!£tl".'S~ ,•r,t HE;.;ORDS & i.1 ~. : · · · ,,,., :".I'/~,:'.> ~-U-' rOR VALUE RC:CEIVED, As~ignor does hereby ABSOLUTELY AND IMMEDIATELY SELL, ASSIGN, 'TRANSFER, CONVEY, SET OVER and DELIVER unto As;,ignee any and all existing and future leases (in cluding s ubleases thereof). whethec w,i tten or oral. and all future agreements for use and occupancy, and any and all extensions, renewals and replacements thereof, upon al l or relating Lo any part of the rec'.ll propert~· described as follows : Lot '.J, Block !, , South center Corporate Park, as per Plot recorded in the records of King County, Wa s h i ng ton, unde r Record - ing No. 8G03l40871. TOGETHER WITH all buildings and improvemen ts thereon (which real property, bui J dings ar.u improvements are referred to herein as the "Premises"), buL e x cluding any trade fixtures, inventory, equipment or other property owned or lea Re d by the tenant under any lease ass igned hereby. The identified Leases, if any, are either presently existing or future leases, and are as shown in the Schedule of Leases attached 1 1,l·;1-,,;-;1,1 t,·,1 v :n !'·,1 •;•-:-,•r '!':: .l ,.~,.:, ".r ·L::h.:,\ '1'lTI.E l!\/l j (,. \ •. ,·•>: t!'\' \' P'dt,~ H .-•.r·•: 1:11 :. :.,:' '; ' . .l.'i : ~l()Olt f'1t1 \'.'t:'.\t "· ,\r ": r. ::· ~: :·( -;1·1~1 f~r '.1·, ·1 1.: .. \i :, .'';,;,··, ,.,: •:•;!.H ----~-----~--·--:.:.:::.:-~ -.. ----·-- A fi~/ 1 .. -. '"!"'""'' ' . . •,, . 1-.:. \ ' ('') :n 0 ::0 C\i 0 a) • ...... , . I • . r • ' .... ··~-i. hereto and made a part hereof as "Exhibit A. 11 All such leases, subleases, tenancies , agreements, extensions, re- newi!ls and replacements are hereinafter jointly and col- lectively rE.ferred to as the "Le.ises;" provided, t hat a ny and a l 1 leases set forth in the Schedule of Leases may be sometimes referred to herein as the "Identified Leases." TOGE THE R with any and all guaranties of tenants ' performance unde r any a,d all of the Leases. TOGETHER with the immediate and continuing right to collect and receive all of the rents, income, receipts, r evenues, issue s, profits and other income of any nature now d;\I:' or which may become due or to which Assignor may now or s hall hereafter becc ,e entitled to o~· may make demand or claim for , ( including any incorne of any nature coming due during a ny redemption period) arising or issui ng from or out of the Leases or from or out of the Premises or any part thereof, including bu t not limited t o, minir,,1111 rents, addi- tional rents , percentage rents, parking or conunon area maintenance contribu tions , tax and insurance contributions, deficiency rents and liquidated damages following default in any Lease, a nd all proceeds payable under any poJ.i c y of insuranre covering loss of rents resulting from untenant- abi li ty caused by destruction or damage to the Premises, toge titer with any and all rights a nd claims of any kind which As signor may have against any tenan t under the Leases or any subtenants or occupants of the Pr<!mises ( all s uch monies, rights and claims described i n thi s paragraph being h ereir,after jointly and severally referred to as the "Cash Collateral II)' EXCEPTING THEREflWM, any sums which by the 2 t I I l [ 1 t ' '1 L l I l : L .... •••• _,._-... •.. I I £. t \· ,.... __ f') ,n 0 'D (\J C) Q) -----·---r •w~.---• ··*'!-'W ~ --e:1m-a....-: .. -• ........... :zs sq...,.......z c e xpress prov is ions of any of the Leases are payable directly to ;iny governrnen Lill authori I o r to a11y olher pc:·son , firm or corporat ion other than the landlord under the Le ase s. TO HAVE AND TO HOL D lhe s ame unto the Ass ignee, its successors dlld assi gn s forever, or for s uch shorter per i od as hereinafter may be i ndi cated. SUBJECT, however, to a 1 icense hcrPby gra nted by Assignee to Assignor, kit I imi ted as h e 1 . _ na fter provided. to collei;t and receive al J o[ Lhe Cash Collaterai.. THIS ASSIGNMENT rs GIVEN FOR THE PURPOSE OF SECUR - ING the paymen t of the j ndeb tedness evidenced by a certa in Deed o f Trust No te or Promissory Note ( hereinafter re f er.red to as the "N o t ,~") of even date herewith, made by Assignor, payable to t he order of Assignee in t he amount of SIX HUN - DRE D THIRTY THOU SAND AND N0/100 DOL LARS ($630,000 .00), and presently held by Assignee, including any exten sion s, mo11l - ficat i ons a nd renewa l s thereof and any supple~enta l no t e or notes i ncreasing s u ch i ndebtedness, as ~ell as t he payment, observance, performance a nd discharqe of all other obliga- tions, cove n an t s, conditions a nd warranties con t ained i n an All -Inclusive Deed ot Trust of even date herewith (herein- after called "Mortgage") made by Assignor. recorded or to be recorded in the real properly records of Ki n g Cou nty , Wa sh- ington , a nd in any e xtensions, modifi tat ion s, supplements and consolidations thereof, covering the Premises a nd secur - i.ng the Note and supplemental not.es, if any. TO PROTl::CT 'rHE SECURITY OF THIS ASSIGNMENT lT JS COVE NANTED AND AGREED AS FOLLO~S: 1 . As s ignor 's Warranties Concer ning Leases and Cash Col 1 ater_~l_. That Assignor represents and warrants: 3 - .... :-. ("") if) 0 n N 0 0,) --·--W..-· KL£ FY n (a) That i t has good right , title and interest in and lo the Leases and Ca!.h Coll aleral hereby ass igned and goor~ righl to a ssign the same, and that no oth er person, partnership entity or co1poration has any right, title or i n terest therein. (bl That Assignor has duly and punctually per- formed all aud singular the ttrms, covennnts , con ditions and warranties of the Leases on Assignor 's part to be kept, o b served and per[or med. (c) Th at the Identified Leases, i f any, and all other existing Leases are valid and unmodified except as indicated herein and are i;, Iull force and effect. (d) That Assignor has not prev ious1y sold, assigned, tran sferred, mortgaged, pl e dged or granted a security interest in the Identified Leases or Cash Colla- teral from t h e Premi ses, whether now due or hereafter to become due·. (e) 'fhat none of the Cash Collater al due a nd i ssui ll':J -mm the eremi ses or from any part t h ereof ha!' been collected for any period in e xr.ess of two ( 2) months from t he date hereof, and that payme n t oF any o f same has not otherwi se been a nticipated, waived, relea::;ed, discou nted , set off, or otherwise discharged or com p romi sed. ( f) Thal Assignor has not received any funds or deposits from any tenant for whicl1 credit h as no t already been made on account of accrued Ca sh Collateral . (g) l'hat t h e t e nc1-i-1t s under the Identified Leases, if any, are n ot in d efault 0f any of t he terms or provisions thereof . 2. Assignor's Co venants o f Performance. The Assignor c ovenants and agrees : 4 ::. I r:z::::,-,-,_ w (a) To observe , perform .:ind discharge, d u ly and punctually, all a nd singular, t.he o bligations, terms, cove - nants, conditions and warranties of the Note and M0rtgage, of the l dent i f:i ed !,eases , i: any, and of all future Leases affecL ing the Premi ses on the part of Assignor Lo be kept, ob served and per formed; and Lo give promp t no Lice to Assignee of any fail ·1 r e on 1.hP part of As signor Lo o b serve, perform and discharge same. (b) To notify and direc t in writing e ach and every present or futurP tenant 01 occup a nt o f the Premfres or of any part t hereof Lhat any security depos,l or othe1 deposi Ls heretofore delivered to Assignor have been reta ined by Assignor or ass igne d and deliveted t.o Assignee a:. the case may be. (cl To enforce or secure in the name of Assignee { c:pon no Lice Lo Assignee) the performance of each and every obligation , term, coventl nt, condition ar>d agreement in the !,eases by any tenant to be performed, and to notify Assignee of the occurrence of any defa111t under t he Leases. (d) To appear in and defend any act:i .... ~ or pro- ceeding a1 is ing under, occ urrill<J out of, or in any ma nn er connected with th'! Leases or the obligations, dut:ies or l iab i lities of Assignor or any tenant l.~reunder, and upon reque st. b; 1 .ssignee , Assignor will do so in the name and on behalf of Assignee, h ut at the expen se of Assignor. ( e ) To pdy all costs and e xi,e n ses ot Assignee, including attorneys' fees ind reasonable sum, in any action or proceeding in wh:i ch Assignee may appear in connection herewith. (f) To neither create no r permit any lien, c harge 5 - - I I I ! I I I I L .. ~ _.,., • (') ui ::) ·.:o (\J 0 Cl) 4 ·I · il a ,. or Pncumbranc.c: upon its interest a~ lessor of the :" .ases except the lie11 of .:he Mortgage or as , rovided in the Mo rt- gage. Assignor further covenants and agrees that this Assign- ment creates and conslit11tes an equitable a n d ~pecific lien upon the Cash Collateral, and that this Assignment does not create or constitute il pledge of :ir conditional !:<ecurity interest in s uch Cash Collateral. 3. !'._rjor Approval For Actions Affecting Leases. That Assignor, without the prior written consent of the Assignee, further covenants a nd agrees: (a) Not to receive or collect any Cas h Collateral from any present or future tena n t of the Premises or any part thereo f for a p eriod o f r.iore than two ( 2) mo nths in advance (whether in cash or b y promissory note), n or pledge, transfer, mortgage , grant a security interest in, or o ther- wise encumber or assiqr. fu '~u,:e payments of Cash Col laterill. ( b) Not to waive forg ive , excuse, condone, dis - count , set off, compromi se or in any ma nn er release or Hscharge any tenant •inder any Leases of the Premises o f ar.d from a ny obligation , covenant, condition and agreement by tenant to be kept , observed and performed, i n cluding the obligation lo pay the Cash Co llateral thereunder i n t he manner and at t he place and time specified therein . ( c) Not to cancel, terminate or con sen t to any surrender of any of the Leases, nor co11Unence any action of ejectment o r any s umma r y proceedings for dispossession of the tenant und er any of t he Leases, nor eY.ercise any right of recapture of the Premises provided in any Leases, nor modify or in any way alter the terms thereof. ..... -··-. --__ ......__, __ ......,._ .. ). ',\: I .luidi~ -- - P .&.!!!L!! E..!Z SW ·- ' -. --· -~----... ---------- (") u) 0 ·.:o (\J 0 (l) (d, Not to lease any part of c.he Premises, nor renew or extend the Lenn of an:Y Leases of the Premises unless an opt.1011 therefor was originally sa reserved by tenants 1n the Leases for a fi::ed and ciC".finite rental . (e) Not Lo relocate any tenant with11 the Premises, n o r consent to any modification of the express purposes for which the Pt·emises or any pa•·t I.hereof is to be used , or to any assignment of the Leases by any tenant thereunder or to any ac;signment or further subletting of any sublease. (f) Not to assign, olcdge, encumbe r or plaLe any security agreement against Lhe Leases or cash Collateral . 4. ~ejec!:_i_on of Lease s . 1'hat Assig:101 further cove- nants and agree~ as follows: (a) That in the event any tenant under the !,cases sho11ld become Lhe subject of any proceeding undn Lhe Federal Bankruptcy Acl or a ny other federa l , state o • local statute which provides for the possible termination or rejection of the Leasel; assigned hereby, Assignor covenants and agrees that in the eve n t any of the Leases arc so re•ected, no damages settlement shall be made withouL the prior written consent of the Assignee. ( b) That any check in payment of damages for r ejection or termination of any such Lease will be made payable bolh to the Assignor and Assignee. ( c) Assignor hereby assigns any s11ch payment to As signee and further covenants and agrees that upon request of As signee, it wi ll duly endorse to the order of Assignee any such check, the proceeds of whi ch will be applied to any portion of the indebtedness secured by this /\ssigrunent in such manner as Assignee may elect . 7 __ .......____ L.. •. _:zz ---· · :-----,·:;55;--sz .. --FEE --........ -·-.........---·~· .. #.~~ ~.:.! - 5. Default Deemed Default llnde r Deeu of Trust. The Ass ignor hereby coven an t s and agrees that i n the event any representation ur warranty herein 1f As s tgnor shall be round t o be untrue or Ass ignor s hall defaul t in the observance or M perfcrmance of any obl igaUon, term , covenant, c ondi.Lion or L{) ~ warranty herein, then in each such instance, the same shall N c onstitu le and be deemed to be a de fault under the Note and 0 QJ Mortgagt . thereby entitling /\s s iq11ec to d eclare al l s um s secured thereby a nd her eby inunediately due and payable and to exerci se a ny a nd all of t he rights and remedie s provided the reunder and herein , as wel l as those provided by law or in equity. 6. Lice nse to Collect Cash Collateral. The parties agree that as long as there shali exist no default by As signor in the payment of a ny indebtedness s ecured hereby or in the o bservance and pe rformanc e of any othe r obligation, term, covenant , c ond i tion or wa rranty herei n or in the Note and/or Mortgage or contained in the Leases, Assignnr shall have the right under a lir.e nse granted he reby (but limited as provided in the foll owing section) to collect, but not prior to accrual, a l l of the Cash Co llateral a r ising from or out of Suid r,eases, or any r enewals , extension-; and replacements thereof, or from or out of the Prem ises or any part thereof; and Assignor shall receive s uch Cash Collateral and hold the Cash Collateral, together with the r ight and license herei n granted, as a trust fund to be applied, and Assignor h ereby covenants to so apply them. as required by Assignee, £.irst to t h e payment of taxes and assessments upon said Premises .before penalty or interest is due thereon; second to the costs of insurance, maintenance and repairs required by the 8 -·~--.,.....i.-..........:....a . ..&.. ... -- ' I ,· ·'-··-•· 1· _..-.,,. __ M in 0 'J.) (\J 0 Q) terms of said Mo r Lg age; ttnrd to Lil e satisfaction of all ob l i gt1 t 1 ons under t he Lr ;ses; and fourth to the payment of interest, principal and any other sums becoming due under the Note a nd Mo rtga,Je, before u sin g any part o f the same for ,my other purpose::;. 7. PerfoJmance and Termination of ~~i cen~. (a) The parties agree that upon the conveyance by Assi gnor and its successors a nd ass ... gns of t'he fee title of the Prernj ses, all riqht , t1 tie , i n leres t and powers granted u n der the license des~ribed abuve shall automatically pass to a 11 d may be e xe1 cised by each subsequent owner; and that upon or al ,my time afte1 de foul t 111 the payment of any 1.ndebtedn ess ser.ured hereby o r in the observance or perfor- mance of any obligation, Lenn, covenant, condition or warranty contained herein, in t h e Note, Nurtgage or in the Leases, the Ass i gnee, ;:it its option and wi tho11t notice , shall have the complete I ight. p o wer and authority hereunder to e xe rcise and enforce any or all of LI1 e following rights and remedi es al any time. ( l) Tc Lermina t e Lhe l icense granted t.o Assignor to collect the cash CoJlatei:al without taking possession of t he Premises or the Leases, ftnd to demand, collect, receive, sue for, dttach and levy agai nst the Cash Collatera l in Assignee's name; t o give proper receip ts, releases and acquit tances therefor; and after deducti ng all necessary and propel costs and expenses uf operation and coliectio n As determined b y Assignee, including reasonable attorneys' fees, to appJ y the net. procP.eds t he r eof, t o gether with a ny funds of Assjgnor depo sit e d with Assignee, up on any indebtedness secured hereby and in s uch order as Assignee may determine. 9 D -.... - 1 Mu L ·---~·----.---...'fi4 G Ail ... ....,.-Mila kW ,. (2 ) 'ro decla re all sums secured hereby inune - diately due and payable and , at i ts option, exercise al l or any o f the rights and remedies contained in the Note and/or Mortgage or other instrument given to s e cure thr i nde ~ted- nes s secu red hereby . ( 3) without regard to the adequacy of the ~ security or the so lvency of As s ignor , with or without any .:x.J action or p r oceeding t hrough any person, agent, t rustee or niceiver under the Mortgage, or by a receiver to be appointed by cour:t, ;;ind w.ilhout regard to Assignor's po ssession, to enter upon. tak~ possession of, man age and operate thf' Premises or any part thereof; make , modify , enforce, cancel or accept surr~nder of any Leases now or hereafter in effect on said Premises or any part theniof; r e move and evict :my tenant; incre11se or decrease rents; decorate , c lean , repair and otherwise do any act or incur any costs or expenses as Assignee s h a ll deem proper to protect t he :;ecu r:i ty hereof, as fully and to the same extent as Assignee could do if in possessio11; c!h<l i.n s uch event, to apply the Ca!lh Collateral so collected in such order as Assginee s h all deem proper to the permanent operation and managemenL fees and costs , brokerage and attorneys' fees; payment of the indebtedness under: the Note and Mortgage and payment to a reserve fund fo r replacements and capital improvements, which fund shall not bear int ·~est. ( .J l Require Assignor to transfer all security deposits to Assignee , together with all records evidencing s uch deposits . lb} Assignor further ag r ees and coven ants t h at for the p u rposes here i nabove enumerated in this sect ion, 10 - ... -~ _ .... --... 2 ~ ~ .. c.,. --• --• ~. .: . • . ~ • . • ' .4 .• . . .. . . ... • . (') tn 0 '.l'.) Assignee shall have constructive possession, whether or not it is in actual possession, in orde1 to effectuate such purposes , and in no event shal 1 Assigne~ accrue any liabil ty by reason of such constructive possession. Assignee shall not be required to give not~ce, or make demand, to Assignor or· any tenants under then ex is ting Le11ses of its actions to N o effectuate such purposes; provided, howeve r, that the G) acceptance by Assignee of t his Assignment, with all of the rights, powers. pri. vi leges and authority created hereunder shal L 110!., prior to entry upon and taking possession of the Premises by Assignee, be deemed or construed to constitute the Assignee a "Mo rtgagee i n Possession," nor thereafter or at any time or in any event obligate Assignee Lo appea1 i11 or defend any action or proceeding relating to the Leases or the Premises, or to take any action hereunder or thereunder, or lo expen<l any money or i 11cu1 any expenses 0r per form or discharge any obligation, duty or liability under the Leases, or to assume any obligation or responsibility for any secur - ity deposils or other deposits delivered to Assigno r by any tenant t here under and not assigned and del 1 "ered to Assignee; nor shall Assignee be liabl e in any way for injury or damage to person or property sustained by any person or persons, partnership. firm or cot-poration in or about the Premises. (c) That the collection of the Cash Collateral and application t hereof as aforesaid and/or the entry upon and taking possession of the Premises shall '1either cure or 1,·.::.;ve any default nor waive, modify or affect any notice of default required under the Note and/or Mortgage nor inva li- date any act done pursuant to s uch notice. The enforcement of any right or remedy by Assi9nee, once exercised, shall 11 ~-----·-....... ~ ... ·~ ·: -. ":~ ~ I l l I .. - .. --- --~-· --~--------~=,. .... -, . ,E.;,1 -~T · . continue until Assignee shall have collected and applied such Cash Co .• ateral as may be necessary to cure the then existing default and for so long thereafter as Assignee may, in its sole discretion, deem necessary t0 secure the in- debtedness . Although t he original default be cured and the exercise of any such right or remedy be discontinued, the ~ same or any other right or remedy hereunder shall not be UJ exhausted and may be reasserted at an·· ~.ime and from time to time following any subsequent default. (d) The rights and powers conferred upon Assignee hereunder are cumulative of and not in lieu of any other rights and powers otherwise granted by AsGignee. 8. ~ointment of Attorney. The Assignor hereby constitutes and appoints Assignee its true and lawful attor- ney-in-fact, coupled with an interest; and in the name, place and stead of Assignor, to subordinate at any time and from time to time, any Leases affecting the Premises or any part thereof to the lien of the Mortgage or a ny other mort- gage or deed of trust, security interest, lien or encum- brance of any kind encumbering the Premises, or to any ground lease of the Premises; and to request or require such subordination where such option or authority was reserved to Assignor under any such Leases, or in any case where Assignor otherwise would have the right, powe r or privilege so Lo do. This appointment s hall be irrevocable and continuing and these rights, powers and privileges s hall be exclusive in Assignee, its su::ce ssors and assigns as long as any :1art of t he indebte dness secured hereby shall r~main unpaid. As - signor hereby warrants that it has not, at any time prior to t he date hereof, exercised any right to s ubordinate any s uch 12 a b::=== ---------.. ,_ iiiiifjT • • ·_, ,• ~' I ~ •z I .,, . • • • ' . •, ·• • • • • ' . . •, t • •• • M :n 0 •_[' c5 Q) Leases to the Mortgage or to any other mortgage, deed of trust, interest, lien or encumbrance of any kind, or 91 ,)und lease (except the ground lease or leases creating the Prerr.- ises, if any) and further covenants not to exercise any such right. 9 . I ndemni fica tion . The Assignor shall indem. 1 and hold Assignee harmless from a nd shall defend l>.ssignee against, any and all liability, loss, cla1;iage or expense wh j ch Assignee may incu r under or by -eason of this Assignment, or for any action taken by Assi 9nce hereunder, er by reason or 111 defense of any and all claims and demands whatsoever which may be asserted against Assignee arising out of the Leases, including but nol limited to, any claims by any tenants of cr.edi t for rent~~ for any period under any Leases for more than two ( 2) months in advance of the due date thereof and security deposits paid to and received by Assignor, but not delivered tL Assignee. Should Assign€•: incur any such liability, loss, damage or e xpense, the -1ount the reof (including reasonable attorneys' fees) with interest thereon at the maximum r 2~e permitted by law shall be payable by Assignor immediately witho ut demand, and shall be secured as a lien hereby and by said Mortgage. 10. Hecords. Until the indebtedness secured hereby shall have been paid in full, Assignor shall deliver to Assignee executed copies of the Leases and any and all renewals of existing Leases and future Leases upon all or any part of the Premises , and will transfer and assign such Leases upon the same terms and conditions as herein con - tained. Assignor hereby covenants and agrees to make , execute and deliver unto Assignee, upon demand and at any time, any 13 .-:....... ·*'·-· _. -- and all assi9· ments and other records and i nstruments, including but not limited to, rent rolls, tenant ii.nancial statemen ts and books of account sufficient for the purpose that Assignee may deem to be advisable for carrying out the purposes and intent of this Assignment. ll. No Waiver. The fa ilure of Assignee to avail itself of any of the terms, covenants and conditions o f this Assignment fo,· any period of time or at any time s hall not be, nor anything done or omitted to be done by Assignee pursuant hereto shall be deemed , a waiver by Assignee of any of its rights and remedies unde r the Note and/or Mo r tgas" or of the benefit of the laws of the State in which the said Premises are situated. The rights o f Assignee to collect the said indebtedness, to enforce any s~curi ty therefor, or to enforce any other right or remedy hereunder may be exer- cised by Ass ignee , either prior to, simultaneously with, or ;ubsequent to, a ny such oth~r action hereinbefore described, and shall not be deemed an election of remedies. 12. Primary security. Thi s Assjgnment is absolute, uncondi tional and primary in nature to the obligation evi- denced and secured by the Note, Mortgage and any other document given to secure and collateralize the indebtedness secured hereby. Assignor agrees that Assignee may enforce this Assignment without first resorting to or exhausting any other security or collateral; provided however, that nothi ng herein contained shall prevenL Assignee from suing on the Note, foreclosing the Mortgage judicially as a mortgage or non-judicially as a deed of trust, or exercic;ing any other right or remedy under any other document l)Videncing or col.lateralizing the indebtedness secured hereby. 14 ......_,J.i.... . .-_ ........ ~,--~--""-·,o.:.-. -·· • _, ~ ... -ii ·-··· ·--.... _..,.._ ·-.. __ ., ~;·t . ~ ·.: . . :'"' . . ."' . . ' . ·. ~·-4 $ 4 13 . Merger. 'l'he fact that ( i) the Lease-. or the l easehold est ate created thereby may be he ld directly or indirectly by or fot the account of any person or entity whi ch shall have an interest in the fee estate of Lhe Prem- ises, :ii) the operatior, "f law, or (iii) any other event s hall not merge any Leases or the leasehold estates created thereby with the fee estate in the Premises so long as ,ny of the indebtedness secured hereby and by the Note and Mortgage shal l remnin unpaid , unless Assignee shall consent in writinq to such merger. 14. Termination of AssiCJ!!!l!en~. Upon paym.?nl 111 full of all of the i ndeb tedness evidenced by t:h• Note and secured by the Mortgage and payment ot all sums payable hereunder, this Assi91une"/1t shall be void and of no further effect and no jndgn,ent or decree entered as to said indebtedness shall operate to abrogate or lessen the effect of this Assigrunent unti 1 such indebtednes s has actual! y been paid; provided, t hat tile affidavit, certificate, lette1 01 ~lat:emenL of any officer of Assignee showing that any portion of said in- debtedness or sums remains unpaid shal l be, and shall con- stitute, conclusive evidence of the validity, effectiveness and continui ng force of this Assigrunent. Any person, firm or corporation may, and is hereby authorized by Assignor to, rely on such affidavit, certificate, letter o r statemen t . A demand hy Assignee of any tenant for payment of Cash Col- lateral by reason ')f any default claimed by Assignee shall be sufficient direction to said tenant to make future pay- me nts of Cash Collateral to Assignee withou t the necessity for further consent by or notice to Assignor. 15. Noti ce. All notices, demands, requests or docu- 15 • i ~,(. •• ·---... ~ .. ft 3 44 \"") J) C) :I.) (\J 0 c:J ments of any kind which Assignee may be required or may des ire to serve upon Assignor hereunde r s hall be suffi - ciently delivered by delivering same to Assignor personally or by leaving a copy of same addressed to Assignor at Atsignor's ad0ress herein set forth, or by Assignee deposit- ing a copy of s ame =n a regul arly maintained receptacle of the United States mails, pnsl,.-Je prepaid, certified or registered mail, addressed to Assignor at said address . Notices. nemands, requests and documents given in s uch manner shall be deemed sufficiently delivered, served or given for all purposes hereander at the time such notic1:, demand, request or document shall have been delivered to or mailed as hereinbefore provided to the addressee. Any party hereto m.:iy, by delivery to the other party of notice, desig- nate a differenl address. 16 . Assignment Binds Successo: The terms, covenants, conditions and warranties contained herein, and the powers granted hereby, shall run with the land and shall inure to the benefit of, and bind all parties hereto and their respec- tive heirs, executors, administrators, marital com mun ities (if any), successoLs and assigns and all tenar~s and their subtenants and assiqns ,rn d all subsequent owner:.. f the Premises and subsequent holder of the Note and/or Mortgage. 1 7. Additional Rights and Remedies . In addition to, but not in lieu of, any other rights hereunder, As'>ignee shall have the righ t to institute suit aud obtain a protec- tive or mandatory injunction to prevent a breach or default of, or to enforce the observation by such Assignor of, the agreements, covenants, terms and conditions contained herein, and shall have the right to attorneys' fees, costs, expenses, 16 .~·--··· ,.-.-. .1 .,., - .. ... "' 1".!': ~ , . . ,• . ~ . -. • • • .__0 -,--'---~ ~_.I : _. _ ---.---------..=.::...• I • • ~ _, -r ·--· ---yttrnsjF t Ji .£ I 3 a;; --~-.-.-, ;ind ordinary and punative jamz:qes breach or default by Assignor. 18. Locati?n of Perfonnance. )ccasioned by any such Assignor expressly agree::; that this Assigrunent is performable at the county in which the Premise& is located and waives the righl to be sued elsewhere. The Assignor agrees and consents to the ~ jurisdiction of any court of competent jurisdiction located lO in the COl''1ty in which the Pre1nises is located 19. Severabili ty. If any provision of this As si.grunen t or the applicati on thereof to any enti t.y , person c,r circum- s ta nee shal 1 be invalid or unenforceab1 e to any ex Lent, the remainder of this Assigrunent and the application of such provisions to other entities , persons or circumstances shall not be affected t hereby, and shal 1 not be affecte d thereby , and shaJ 1 be enforced to the greatcs t. extent permitted by law . 20 . ~o Third Part_y ~ssignees. It 1s exp r e s sly agreed by A!"signor that I.his Assignment shall not b e construed or deemed made for the benefit of any thild parly or parties. 21. Entire Agreeme!lt. This Assignment c onta ... s the entire agreemenl concerni11g the Assigrunent of Leases and Cash Col lateral between t h e parties here Lo. No variations, modifications or changes herein or hereof sha ll be binding upon any party hereto unless set forth in u document duly executed by or 'lO behalf of such party . 22. Construction. Whenever used herein , whenever the context. so requires, the singular number shall include the plural, t h e plural the singular, and the use of any gender Ghull include all genders. 'l'he word, "Mortgage," as used herein shall mean Mortgage, Deed of Trust, Trust Deed, 17 • I ... __ :;. ,. ···-~ ... wazc .,. ~~-4 -,. l'·~ ,,. \ f '. •n I i' , .. M lf) 0 '.X) ('\J 0 a &.tWt ass -~ -----r .. ~~ ....... es Security Deed or Deed tu Secure Debt. All o bligation s of each Assj ':'!O r hereunder s h all be joint and several. 23. Multipl e Counterparts . This i n strument may be exe -::u ted i11 multiple counterparts, all of which shall b e deemed ori ginals and with the same effect as if a ll parties h ereto had signed the same document. All of s uch counter - parts s hall be construed together and $hall constitute onP. instrument , but in ma k ing p roof. it s hall only b e necessary to produce one s u c h counterpart. 24. Go v ern ing Law. The parties agree that the law of the State in which the Pr emises is l ocated shall govern t he performance and enforcement of this Assignm e nt . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have e xecuted this Assignmen t on this Address : Address : -. ~· 'w':1:\11 1 -Mt : ·····"'-·,.-, ,· 3 day of --....?f.u/.; , i4U-. . . 1' . )'·',( ( I ~ < ,··' ~, '°, ) ) ~"'::}Pr /,' OLi VE S. MCKEEN ' Husband and Wife 6203 South 194th Street Kent, Washington ASS IGNEE O'DONNELL , BRIGHAM & PARTNERS - NORTHWEST PROPERT l p Do v e Street S uite 760 Newport Beach, CA 92660 18 ••• ,·-· -i .•• J,o.t • (") 1n 0 'l) Q.S~ - STATE OF ~/9t../hVf!.Vl;'J COUNTY OF O/fVl,4./6-e-- I $ I - ss. On Uns /()-(:L, ddy of .hYL$~v , 198 I, before me, the u nders 1gned , a Notary PUblc rl, and· for the State 0 f CAt.if;oM1t1:_. duly commissioned and sworn, person- ally ~ppeared .roHil a . () '/MNU([L~, to me known to be the Manag1no Partner of O'DO NNEL L, BRIGHAM & PARTNERS -NORTH- WEST PROrERTIES, a Gencrai Partnership, the partnership that executed the forcgoiny instrument, and acknowledged the said instr~menl to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership, fo1 the uses and purposes therein ment.ioned, and on oath stated thal he was authorized to execute the sai d instrument. WITNESS my hand and off:icial seal hereto affixed Lhe day and year firs l above written. : ·i"c,~, ,11' .~ MARSHA l. AUSTIN ~ ~ o • • •0111,r, PUBllC • CAWOAdNIA \ i ·~ "· --~~G_(_OOIJ~D'. ) ~,1!82 STATE OF I " COUNTY OF 't ~~X:~· Notary Public 1n and for the state of vfHPdlC&lv}., residing al ---· _ ss. On this /.:. '1 day of _/._ l' ,,, J ·, , 19 c.</, before me, tfe unde i:sjgned, a Notary Publlc,:,it; and foi: the StatP of , .• ,_./.,,1{,i-·1., personally appeared .. DOUGLAS E. McKEi:;N and OLIVE s. 7 McKEt::N, to me known to be the persor:; named in the foregoing document, a nd ackno·iledged to me "hat they executed lhe same freely and voluntarily for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Wj tness my hand and official seal the day i!-nd· •year ; in th::..z ccrti fic.itc first aboye wr.i tlen. .' .· ./.·-;,.'·: . ·· , l \ / . '/, . { ;;,, ::,; . </' ~ .t,, , I j (( i..1\.i:...,1,°.{ot/."'/~1llr..,, No t~F P 1c in an~ ,_or ~ e:~~.,,e,.· · of !. res1,11ng a.t~7 ... ~ru. WDS/31B 19 _._---:it...••• .... )A ............. 1:A:t .,e,. ,-t ·@Ctttcei'M wk-+m --. - . ' ·--.;;::;::: ·,,, .. , ..... . '· ,; ~i .. , (') :.n 0 -:0 N 0 co zmz • • • • • • • ..-~ -~ • t .... --; ~ ; 4 L • UC EXhIBIT A Lot 5 , Block 5 , Southcenter Corporate Park, a s per Plat recorded in Volume 111 of Plats, pages 36-4 2 inclusi ve, records of King County. Washington. ••• ~ ........ ---.~~ ---.~ ...... 111,. ~ .. -..._ '1 . . ..i •. = \ .J I ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND CASH COLLATERAL TH IS ASS lGNMENT OF LEASE S AND CA~II CC'LLA'l'E RAI, (herein;,.fter referred to as t h'! "Assignment") is made by a nd between DOUGLAS E . MCKEEN and OLIVE S. McKEEN, husband and wife (hereinafter jointly and Reveral]y referred t0 as the "Assignor"), and O'D ONNELL , BRIGHAM & PARTNERS -NORTHWEST .. I •. ··-. ·.•·:·1111 .•. . . . PROPERTIES, a general partnership . RFCO~OF~ l'"' WITNESS ETH: fni 111 ti 1s ti'C8 : ~ ·-rt !~ rr : ~! ~· £~! liEt,;ORDS .&. U F, : ' ,~~ ."" (.fl(, G:' c;r-'. UJ FOR VALUE R;:;CEIVED , Asdgnor does hereby ABSOLUTELY AND IMMEDIATELY SELL, ASSIGN, TRANSFER, CONVEY, SET OVER and DELIVER unto As,;ignee any and all existing ancl future leases {including nubleases thereof), whether Wiitten or oral, and all fulure agreements for use and occ upancy , and any and all extensions, renewals a11d replacements thereof, upon all or relating to any part of the real property described as follows: Lot !>, Block '.>, Southcenter Corporate Park, as per Plat recorded in t he records of King County, Washington , under Record - ing No. 8003140871. TOGETHER WITH all buildings and improvements thereon (whi ch real property, buildings ar.d improvements are referred to herein as the "Premises "), but excluding any trade fixtures, inventory, equipment or other property owned or lea~ed by the tenant under any lease assigned hereby. The identified Leases, if any, are either presently existing or future leases, and are as shown in the Schedule of Leases attached 11, ,·;, ··,1: i'· 11.·it \7 or 11•: ··~ , ••. ·u: '": . .: ".t-·L:'.i'-,A ·,·rnJ: ''.\:-'1J; . .-. \ ,· \ '• ); :":•.\ \' P'dl,\ FJ.'.r1-: ,:ii ~-:.:".:, ''}.';: ~l()Olt : :· :;, . I.· :·; :. ~-•• :· • C1i1 °\',T'\t '\ .\r ·•: i :: ~;:·( ·t1 1:1 f :'f .... ,: ,· ·1 1.; H ,; ~•1 • .-:· 'i ) ,· •:'j!.H ----...--:..--___ _ ... _JI!' ___ i • • • • "' -• ' • r • , 'tr •• "''T" hereto and made a part hereof as "Exhibit A.11 All such leases, subleases, tenancies , agreements, extensions, re- new;ils and replacements are hereinafter jointly and col- lectively re.ferred to as the "Leases;" provided, that any and all leases set forth in the Schedu le of Leases may be sometimes referred to herein as the "ldentified Leases." TOGE THE R with any and all guaranties of tenants' performance under any a~d all of the Leases. 'fOGETliER with the immediate and c ontinuing right to collect and recei.ve all of the rents, income, receipts, revenues, issues, profits and other income of any nature now d;ie or which may become due or to whjch Assignor may now or shall hereafter becc :ie entitled to o.c' may make demand or claim for, ( including any income of any nature coming due during any redemption period) arising or issuing from or out of the Leases or from or out o[ the Premises or any part thereof, :including but not limited to, minir .. 1111 rents, addi- tional rents , percentage rents, parking or common area maintenance contributions, tax and insurance contributions, deficiency rents and liquidated damage s foll owing default in any Lease, il lld al 1 proceeds payable under any policy of insurance covering loss of rents resulting from untenant- a bility caused by des truction or damage to the Premises , togetl-ier with any and all rights and claims of any kind which Assignor may have against any tenant under the Leases or any subtenants or occupants of the Pr<!rnises ( all such monies, rights and claims described in this paragraph being hereinafter jointly and severally referred to as the "Cash Collateral 11 ), EXCEPTING THEREFROM, any sums which by the 2 ___... ____ __,_...;, _______ _ I t ! f f f * t t r· , f I l ! L ~ ... ---~· ' I !' \· ........ ('") ,n 0 '"O N C) Q) . -·· . -= : ____ ...c.. -''--=-=c=~ 'it express provisions of any o[ the Leases are payable direcLly to r1ny governmenLal a 11thon t or tu any other pc:·son, ffrm or corporation other· Lhan the land lord U!lder the Leases . TO 111\VE ANU TO BOLD lhe same unto the Assignee, its successo1 s and .:issigns forevc r, oi for such shorter period as hereinafter may be indicated. SUAJ ECT, however, to a license hereby granted by Assignee t o Assigno1, hut limited as he1 ,_nafter provit.icd, to collect and receive all of t he Cash Co llaterai. THIS /\SSJGNMENT IS GIVEN FOH THE PURPOSE OF SECUR- I NG the payment of the indebtedn ess evidenced by a certain Deed of Trust Nol.e or Promissory Note ( hereinafter referred to as the "Note ") of even da te herewith, made by Assignor, payable to the order of Assignee in the amount of SIX HUN- DRED THIRTY THOUSAND AND N0/100 DOLLARS ( $630,000.00). and presently held by Assignee, including any extensions, modi- fications and renewals thereof and any supp lem~n tal note or notes increasing such indebtedness, as 1-:eJ 1 as the pilyment, observan ce, pe rformance and discharqe of all other obliga- tions, covenan ts, conditions a n d warranties con t ained in an All -lnclusive Deed of Trust of even date ~erewith (herein- after called "Mortgage") made by Assignor , recorded or to be recorded in the real properly records of King County, Wash- ington, and in any exten sions, modifitations, supplements and consolidations thereot, coveri n g the Premises and se~u r - ing the Note and supp l emental n otes, if any. TO PROTE CT 'rHE SECURJTY OF THIS ASS TGNMENT IT J S COVENANTED AND AGREED AS FOLLO~S: 1. Assignor's warranties Concerning Leases and Cash Col l ate;-.51J_. That Assignor rep rnsents and warrants: 3 -WWW - ·.:.. .. '·----~~-=-·--. .. ---- -· ----·-ir--~. · I (Y) ,n 0 ·n N C a.) l w.F or •• (I,\ (a) Th at it has good right , title a nd interest in and to the Leases and Car:h Collateral hereby assigne d a nd gonrl right to assign the same , a~d t h at no other person, partnership entity or co1,,ot·ation h as any righ t, title or i nterest therein. (b) That Assignor ha ~ dul y and punctually per- formed a ll and singu l ar the tE:rms, covenants, condition s and warranties of the Leases o n As s ignor 's part to be kept , observed and performed . ( c) That the Identified Le ases, if any, and all other existing Lea!:>es are valid a nd unm odified excapt as indicated here i n and are i ,, foll force and effect. (d) That Assignor has n ot previously sold , as signed, transferred, mortgaged, pled ged or granted a security interest in the Identified I.eases or Cash Colla - teral from the l'remises, whether now due or hereafte r to become due. (e) Th at none of the Cash Collateral due a n d i ssui n<:, _.com the Premises or-from a ny part thereof ha~ been collected for any pe riod in exr.ess of two (2) months from the date hereof, and that payment of a ny of same has n ot otherwi se been anticipated, waived, released, discounted, set off, or otherwise disch arged or compromised. ( f ) 'l'hat Assignor has not received a n y funds or deposits from any tenant for wh icb credit h as no t already been made o n account of accrued Cash Collateral. ( g ) That t he tem.ints under the I d e n tified Leases, if a ny, are not i n default 0f any of t he terms or provisions thereof. 2. Assigno r 's Covenants of Performance. The Ass ignor covenants and agrees: 4 :. ! 1 i i f I i I· t f I ; l ;. ( I w ~/~\ \' ... :. n .{) 0 'O N =:> uJ ------ NT .-- (ii) 1'o observe, perform and discharge , duly and punct ually, all and singular, t:he obligations, t erms, cove- nants, condi tions and warranties of the No te and Mortgage , of t he Iden ti f i ed Leases, if any , and of all fu ture Lea s e s a ffecLi ng the Premises on the pa rt of Assignor Lo be kept, observed and performed ; and lo give prompt notice to Assignee of a ny fail·1 re on the part of Assignor lo observe, perform and discharge same:. (b) To notify and direct in writing each and every present o r future tena nt or occupa nt of the PremiEes 01 of any part t hereof tha L any secu rJty d epos~t o r othe1 deposits heret o foni dehve 1-ed Lo Assignor have bef'n retai.ned by Assignor or assigned and de J i v ered to Assignee a s the case ma y b e. (c) To enforce or secure in the name of Assignee ( upon notice to Assignee) the performance of each and every obligation, term, covenant, cond ition ilr>d agreement in the f,eases by any Lena n t to be perfomed, a nd t o notify Assignee of t he occurrence o f any d f'fault under the Leases. ( d) To appear i..n and de fend any acti ,....._ or pro - ceeding a1 i sing under, occurnng o ut. of, or in any manne r connected with th~ Leases or t h e obliga tions, dul:ies or liabilities of Assi gnor or any tenant l .~reunder, and upon request b; 1.ssignee, Assignor will do so in the name and on behal f of Assignee, hut at the expense of As s ignor . ( e) 1'o pcty all costs and e xJJ e nses ot Assignee, includin g attorneys' fees ind reasonable sum, in a ny ac tion or proceeding i n which Ass ignee may appear in c o nnection he rew i th . (f) To neither cr~ate nor permit any lien, c harge s --"=-"----~=~--..... ~- I i l ! I I I L .... =-- - • <ZR C {') Lf) C) 'X) N 0 Cl) filLZELLS£!2!2SZ . $W * f ,6 ' • I .~ _,,,,. • .; -• or f"nc umb r anc-! upon its interest as lessor of the .: :ase s e xcept the lien of che Mo rtgage or as .. rovided in the Mort- gage. Assign o r further covenants and agrees that t his As sign- ment c rea tes and constitutes an equ itable and a pecific lien upon the Cash Coll a teral, and that t his Assignment does not create or c0nstitu t e a pledge of o r conditional security interest in such Cash Collat eral . 3. f.!::_~or Approval For Actions Affecting Leases. That Assignor , witho u t the prior wri tten consent of the Assign ee, further covenants and agrees: (a) Not to receive o r col l ect any Cash co llate ra l fr om any present or future tenan t of the Premises or a ny part thereof for a period of more t han two ( 2 ) months in advance (whethe r in cash or by promissory note), nor pledge, t ransfer, mortgage, grant a security i n terest in, or o ther- wise encumber or assign fu'~ur.e payme n ts of Ca s h Collateral. (b ) Not to waive forgive, excuse , condone , dis - c ount, set off, comprom; se or in any manner release or iischarge any tenant •in d er any Leases of the Pr emises o f ar..d from a ny ob l igation, coven ant, condition a n d agreement by ten a n t to be kept, observed and performed, i n cluding the obligation lo pay t he cash Co llateral thereunder in the manner and a t the place and time specified therein. ( c) Not to cancel, terminate or consent t o a ny s u rrende r of any of the Leases, n or commence any action of ej ectment or any s umma ry proceedings for dispossession o f the tenanl under any of the Leases , nor exercise a n y right of r ecapture of t he Premises provided in any Leases , nor modify or in any way alter t he t erms thereof. -----~~ ..... --~~-~ ---,.:,. . ' " -- - = ---~~~------~--.. (') ;J) 0 ·.:o (\J 0 U) (ct, Not to l ease any part of the Premises , not renew or extend the Lenn of any Leases of the Premises unless an opt.1011 t herefor 1<1as originally so reserved by tenants in the !..cases for a fi::ed and d (".fi nite renta l. ( e) Not Lo reloca t c any t e nant wi thi1 the Premises, nor consent to any modi fication of the express purposes for which Lhe Premises or any p a·t thereof is to b e u se d, o r to any assigr1men t o( t h e Leases by any te nant thereunder or to ,my assignment o r further s ubl e lt.ing of any s ubleas e. (fl Not to a ssi gn, oledge, encumber 01 place any secur i ty agreement against t h e Leases or Cash Col lateral. 4. ~-~ject_ion of Leases. 1'hat Assigaor furthe r cove- nants and agrees as fol l o1<1s : (a) That 1n the event any ten a nt under the Leases s h o uld become the subj ec t of any proceeding undn Lhe Federal Bankruptcy Act 01 a ny other fe dera l, state O' Local. statute which provides fo1 t h e p ossi ble terminaUon or nijection ot Lile Leases assigned hereby, Assignor covena nts a nd agrees thal in the even t any of the Leases are so re i ected , no damages settl eme n t s hall be made withou t the p rio1 written consent of the Assignee. ( b) That a ny c heck in paymen t of damages for rejection or te rm i nation of any s u ch Lease wi ll be made payable both to the Assignor and Assignee. (c) As s ignor hereby assigns any such payment to Assignee and further covenants and ag rees that upon request o f Ass ignee, it wi l l duly e ndorse to t h e order of Ass i gnee any suc h c heck, the proceeds of which will be applied to any portion of the indebtedn es s secured by this Assignmen t in such manne r as Assignee may elect. 7 -......:....... .. ..., ... ·~ .... ,_ ~----- . \amK L . · -.~----yyCT573 .. FEET '~· ·., ,, ' it ! - '·~ '· Ji,,,'!..•.!'.- 5. Default Deemed Default llnder Deeu of Trust . The Assignor hereby covenants and agrees tha t in the event any represen tation ur warranty herein ·)f Assi.gnor shall be round to be untrue or Assignor shall default in the obs~rvance o r (") per fcrmance of any obligation, term, covenant, condi Lion or lf) ~ warran ty herein, then in each such instance, the same s hall N constituLe and be deemed to be a default under the Note and 0 Ql Mortgagt . thereby entitling Assignee to dee] are all sums secured thereby and hereby immediately due and payable and to exercise any and all of the rights and remedies provided thereunder and herein, as well as t hose provided by law or in equity. 6. License to Collect Cash Collateral. The parties agree that as long as there shali exist no default by Assignor in the payment of a ny indebtedness secured hereby or in the observance and performance of any other obligation, term, covenant , condition or warranty herein or in the Note and/or Mortgage or contained in the Lease s, Assign"r shall have the right under a license granted he reby (but limited as provided in the following section) to collect, but not prior to accrual, all of the Cash Co ll ateral arising from or out of said Leases, or any renewals, extension, and replacements thereof, or f rom or out of the Premises or any part thereof; and Assignor shall receive such Cash Collateral and hold the Cash Collateral , together with the right and license herein g r anted , as a trust fund to be applied, and Assignor hereby covenants to so apply them. as required by Assignee, first to the payment of taxes and assessments upon said Premises before penalty or i nterest "is due thereon; second to the costs of insurance, maintenance and repairs required by the 8 • ' l .. iJ4 ---~ .. -=., J 1· ....,..,_,. (") LD 0 ·.:o N 0 terms o f said Mortgage; third to Lhe satisfaction of all obl igations under the Lr~ses; and !_ourtli to the payment of interest, principa l and any other sums becoming due under the Note and Mo1·tga9e, before using any part of t he same for any other purposes. ·1. Performa nce and Termination of Licer~. (a) The parties agt-ee tl111 t upon the conveyance by ll.) Assignor and 1 ts successors a nd ass~gns of lhe fee tl tle of the Premjses, all right, title, interest and powers granted under the 1 icense descd bed abuve sha U automatic ally pass lo and may be ext!rcised by each subsequent owner; and that upon or at c1 ny time after default rn the payment of any indebtedness secured hereby or in the observance or perfor- mance of any ob ligation, lerm, covenant, condi tion or warranty contai ned herein , in the Note, f•lurtgage or rn the Leases, the Assignee, at its option and without notice, sha ll have the complete right, power and authority hereunder to exercise and enforce any or all of t.he following rights and remedies at any time. ( l) Tc terminate Lhe license granted Lo Assignor to collect the Cash Collateral without taking possession of the Premises or the Leases, and to demand, collect, rece.i ve, sue for, attach dnd levy against the cash Collateral in Assignee's name ; to giv~ proper receipts, releases and acquittances therefor; and after deducting all necessary and propel c0sts and expenses of operation and col1ection as determined by Assignee , including r easonable attorneys' fees, to app] y the net proceeds thereof, togethet· with any funds of Assignor deposited with Assignee, upon any indebtedness secured he reb y and in suc h order as Assignee may determine . 9 D ---- - ' n:tmt: · ' I EU L --.Y-•-... sq CUI W~ 2 ailP • = ("') l.() 0 '.I) (\J C) aJ l ( 2) To declare all s ums secured hereby imme- diately due and payable and, at i t s option, exercise all or ,my o f the rights and remedies contained in the Note and/or Mortgage or other i n strument given to secure thf' indeJted- ness secured hereby. (3) Without regard to the adequacy of the securi ty or the solvency of Assignor, with or without any action or proceeding through any person, agent, trustee or receiver under the Mortgage, or by a receiver to 'be appointed by court, ;;i nd wi Lbout. regard to Assignor's possession, to enter upon , takP. possession of, manage and operate t h e Premises or any part thereof; make , modify, enforce, cancel or accept s urrender of any Leases now or hereafter in effect on said Pr-emi ses or any part thereof; remove and evict :rny tenant; increase or decrease r e nts; decorate, clean, repair and otherwtse do any act or incur a ny costs or expenses as Assignee shall deem p roper to protect the .;ecuri ty hereof, as fully ,rnd to the same extent as Assignee c ould do if in po ssession; ~nd in such event, to apply the Cash Co l lateral so collected in such order as Assginee shall deem proper to the permanent operation and rnanagernen <. fees a nd costs, brokerage ~nd attorneys' fees; payment of the indebtedness under the Note and Mortgage and payment to a reserve fund for replncements and capital im provements, which fund shall not bear int•Lest. (-!) Require Assignor to tr,msfer all s~curi ty deposits to Assignee, to,;;e ther with all records evidencing such deposits. I b) Assignor further agrees and covenants that for the purposes hereinabove enumerated in this section, 10 ---~ • ....L.;._ ••• 2 .... - n lO 0 '.l) . .... .... . . Assignee shall have constructive possession, whether or nol it is in actual possession, in order to effectuate such purposes, and in no event s h al1 Assigne,:: accrue any liabilty by reason of such constructive possession. Assignee shall not be required to give nol:ce, or make demand, to Ass ignor or a n y tenants under then existing LE"i\ses of its actions to N D effectuate such purposes; provided, ho11evcr, that the U.) acceptance by Assignee of this Assignment, with all of the rights, powers. pdvileges and authority created hereunder shall not., prior to entry upon and taking possession of the Prem i ses by Assignee, be deemed or construed to cons ti tutc the Assignee a "Mortgagee in Possession," nor thereafter or at any time or in any event obli<Jdte Assignee LO appear in or defend any action or pro~eeding relating to the Leases or the Premises, or to take any action hereunder or thereunder, or Lo expend any money or incur any expenses 0r per form or discharge any obligation, duty or liability under the Leases, or to assume any obligation or responsibility for any secur- ity deposils or oLher deposits delivered to Assignor by any tenant thereunder and not assigned and deli "ere<l to Assignee; nor shull Assignee be liable in any way for injury or damage to person or property sustained by any person or persons, partnership, firm or corporation in or about the Premises. (c) That the collection of the Cash collateral and application thereof as aforesaid and/or the entry upon a nd taking possession of the Premises shall ~either cure or 1,·2_,ve any default r,or waive, modify or. affect any notice of default required under the No te a nd /or Mortgage nor invali- date any act done pursuant to s uch notice. The enforcement of a ny right or remedy by Assignee, once exercised, shall 11 a - I l I I < --,·· -,.: ''(;;--·1 . 1t M ;n 0 '.l) ----n _____ !_ffl'EF . continue until Assignee shall have collected and applied such Cash Cc_ .a teral as may be necessary to cure the then existing default and for so long thereafter as Assignee may, in i ts sole discretion, deem necessary t~ secure the in- debtedness. Al though t he original default be c ured and the exercise of any s uch righ t or remedy be discontinued, the ~ same or any other right or remedy hereunder shall not be Q1 exhausted and may be reasserted at an ·· ~.ime and from time to time followi ng any subsequent default. (d) The right~ and powers conferred upon Assignee hereunder are cumulative of and not in lieu of any other rights an<l powers otherwise gr~nted by AsG ignee. 8 . ~ointment of At torney. The Assicrnor hereby constitutes and appoints Ass i gnee its true and lawful attor- ney-in-fact, coup led with an interest; and in the name, pla~e and stead of Assignor, to subordinate at any time and from time to time , any Leases affecting t he Premises or any part thereof to the lien of the Mortgage or any other mort- gage or deed of trust, securi ty interest, lien or encum- brance o f any kind encumbering the Premises, or to any ground lease of the Premises; and to request or require such subordination where such option or authority was reserved to Assignor unde r any s uch Lea ses, or in any case where Assignor otherwise would have the righL, power or privil~ge so Lo do. This appointment shall be irrevocable and continuing a nd these rights, powers and privileges ~hall be exclusive in Assignee, its su::cessors and assigns as l ong as any :J att of the indebtedness secured hereby shall rt?main unpaid. As- signor hereby warrants that it has not, at any time prior to the date hereof, exercised any right to subordinate any such 12 ~--t..&.. -~--~-...... --~-·- ---.. ,.. .... , . ~ ,.. ~,· ·'" ~~--.· ! :: 1 : J ~ l I ) ; (") ;n 0 '(' c5 U) -. , .. ·: ' . ~-. ~ . . . . -, ~ . . -. ·. ' . •, . '· Leases to t he MorLgage or to any other mortgage, deed of Lnn;t, i n te1cst, llen or encumbrance of any kind, or g1 1)unrl lease ( e x cept the ground lease or leases creating the Preir.- ises, i f ar,y) and furthe r covenant..s not to exerc i se any such right. 9. lndemnification. The Assigno r shall indem. J and hold Assi gnee harmless from and shall defend l\ssi.gnee againsL, any ,md all l iabili Ly, loss, ciar.iage or expensr: wh j ch Assignee may incur under or by -eason of Lhis Assignment, ot for a ny action La ken by Assi rJ neci hereunder, or by reason or in defense of any and all c laims and demands whatsoever which may be ~sserted against Assignee arising out of the Leases, including but noL limited to, any claims by any tenants of c:red i t for rent.~ for any period under any Leases for more than Lwo (2) months in advance of the due date t hereof and security deposits paid to and received by Assignor, but not d elive red LL As siqnee. Should Ass ignc ,= incur a ny s uch liability , loss , damage or expense, the · 1ount thereof (includ i ng t edsonable a ttorneyr,' fees) with interest thereon at the maximum r i't e permitted by law s hall be payable by Assignor immedi.ately without demand, and shall be secured as a lien he r e by and by said Mortgage. LO. Records. Until the indebtedness secu red here by shall ha ve been paid i n full, Assignor shall deliver to Assignee executed copie s of the Leases and any and all renew als of existing Leases a nd future Leases upon all or a ny part of the Premises, and will transfer and assign such Leases upon the same terms and conditions as herein con - tained. Assignor he r e by covenant s and agrees to make, execute a nd deliver unto Assignee, upon demand and at any time, a n y 1 3 • -... ..-u.l.' 'PiPffl - and all assig· ment::; and other records and instruments , including but not l imited to, rent rolls, tenant fi nancial statements and books of account sufficient for the purpose that Assignee may dee m to be advisable for carrying out the purposes and intent of t hi s Assignment. 11. No Waiver . The fa i lure of Assignee to avail itself of any of t he terms, covenants and conditions of this Assignment fo•· any period of time or at any tirrie shall no t be, nor anything done or omitted to be done by Assignee pursuant he reto shall b e deemed, ;;i waive:r by Assignee of ar:iy of its rights and remedies under the Note and/or Mortgas-= or of the benefit of the laws of the State in which the said Premises are situated. The rights of Assignee to collect the said indebtedness, to enforce any security there for, or to enforce any other right or remedy hereunder may be e xer- cised by Assignee , either prior to, simultaneously wi th, or ,ubsequent to, any s uch othtr action hereinbefore described , and s hal l not be deemed an election of remedies. 12 . Primary Security. This As s jgnment is absolute , uncondit ional and primary in nature to the obligation evi- denced and secu red by the Note, r1ortgage and any other document given to secure and collateralize the i nde btedness sec ured hereby. Assignor agrees that Assignee may enforce this Assignment without first resorting to or e xhaustfog any other security or collateral ; provided h owever, t h at no thing herein contained s hall prevenl Assignee from suing on the Note, foreclosing the Mortgage judicially as a mortgage or non-judicially as a deed of t rust, or exercic;ing any other right or remedy under a ny othe r document ryvi dencing or col.] atera lizing the i ndebtedness secured hereby . 14 -....... ~ ·--.1-.... -.......L , ~~-·-- - l - ... ... ·.,. .. --'Ai Et , •• WI ~-~----: . :-. . ." . . . . . ·. -- ~~·t. . ~ (") If) 0 ·.:o ~ a) 13. Merg er. The fact that ( i ) the Lease-. or the l ~aseh old estate created thereby may be he ld directly or indirectly by 0 1 foi· t he account of any person or entity which s hal l h ave an i nterest in the fee estate of the Prem- ise s, .ii) the oper'itlot, -,f Jaw, or (ui) any other even t s ha ll not merge any Leases or the leasehold estates created thereby with the fee estate j n the Premises r;o long as ~ny of the indebtedness secured hereby and by the Nole and Mortgage shall 1em~in unpaid , unless Assignee sha l l consen t in writing to such merger. 14. 'fetTid nation of Assignm_ent::. Upon payment in full of all of the i ndebt.edness evidenced by '-h' Note and secured by the Mor tgage a nd payment of all sums payable hereunder , thj s Assignme:1l s hall be void and of no further effect and no jt.:ign,ent or decree entered as to said indebtedness shall operate to abrogate or lessen the effect of this Assignment until s u ch indeb tedne!>s has a ctually b een pa i d; provided, that the affidavit, certificate, lettet or st.a •.emenl of any officer of As s ignee showing t hat any portion of said in - debtedness or s um s remains unpaid shall be , and s h all con- stitute, conclusive evidence of the va lidity, e ffec t iveness and continu ing fo r ce of this Assignmen t. Any person , f i rm or corp oration ma y, a nd is h ereby a uthorized by Assignor Lu, rel y on such afficavit, certificate, let.let or statemenr.. A demand l>y Assig nee of any tenant for payment of cash Col - latera l by reason ~f any default c laimed by Assignee shal l be suffic i ent direc t ion to said tenanl to make future pay- ments o f Cash Collate ra l to Assignee without the necessity fo r further con sent by or notice to Assignor . 15. Notice. All noti ces, demands, r equests or docu- 15 r .. ,,. • .. .... • # Q ... • . •• 'C .. • -• -· " • • .. . . .. . . . ... C') :..n 0 ::0 (\J 0 CJ men ts of any kind which Assig11ee may be required or may desire to serve upon Assignor hereunder s hall be suffi- ciently delivered by delivering same t o Assignor personally or by leaving a copy of same addressed to Assignor at Afsignor's address herei n set forth, or by Assignee deposit- ing a copy of same i n a regula rly maintained receptacle of the United States mails, pnsl~-Je prepaid, certified or registered ma i l, addressed to Assignor at said address. Notices, rtemands, requests and d ocuments given in s u ch manner shall be deemed s u fficiently delivered, served ot given for all purposes here;mder at the time such notic<:, d e~and, request or document shal l have been delive red to or mailed as herein.before provided t o the add ressee. Any party hereto may, by delivery to the other party of n otice, desig- nate a dif ferent address. 1 6. As signment Binds Successo: The terms, covenants, conditions and warranties contained herein, and the powers granted h ereby , s hall r un with the land and shall inure to the benefit of, and bind all parties here to and their respec- tive hein;, executors, adm i nistrators, mari tal communities (if any). successors and assigns and all tena!"t s and their subtenants a nd assi qns 3.nd all subsequ ent owner:.. f the Premises and subsequent holder of the No te and/o.r Mortgage. 1 7 . Additional Rights and Remedies. In addition to, but not in l ieu of, any o ther rights hereunder, As r;ignee s h all have the right to institute suit aud obtain a protec- tive or mandatory injunction to prevent a breach or defau l t of, or to enforce the observation by such Assignor of, the agreements, covenants, terms and c onditions contained herein, and shall h ave the right to attorneys' fees, costs, exp enses, 16 _.=l<dz-7--il--iiililiiiizsiiii· iiliiiaiiiiiii,... ____ : · ... -.;;..;,·.::·,r··· ::. -..• ,, . : . .. i..~· .•• , : ..... J ' ,).~ - .. .r.,f:' ,:; ·~"' ···T -·~ (') ,.') 0 '.JO -.. r ·---- and ordi na ry a nd punativc ;lamnges breach or default by Assignor. >ccasioned by any s uch Assignor expressly agrees that this Assignment is performable at the county in which the Premi ses is located and waives the tight to be sued e l sewh ere. The Ass! gnor agrees and consents to Lhe 25 jurisdiction of any court of compe t ent juri s diction located U) in the co,''1ty in which the Prernises is located 19. Severabili ty. If any provision ot this Assignment or the applicati on l hereof to any enti t y, pe rson 0r circum- stance shall be invalid or unenforceab l e to any exlent, the remainde1 of L11is Assigrunent and t he application of such provisions to other entities, persons or circumstances shall not be affected t h ereby, and shall not be affect~d thereby, and shall be enforced to the great.est. extent permitted by law. 20. ~o _Thi r d Part_y ~ssignees . I t is express l y agreed by A~,;ignor that I.his Assignment shall not be construed or deemed made for the benefit of any t h ild party or parties . 21. Entire Agreem_P,n\:. This Assignment c ont.a . ,; the entire agreement conce1ning Lhe Assignment <>f Leases and Cash Collateral between the parties hereto. No variations, modifications 01 changes he rein or hereof shall be binding upon any party h ereto unless se t forth in .::. document duly e xecu tcd b y or ')n behal f of s uc h party. 22. Construc t ion . When ever used herein , whenever the context. so i:equires, the singular number shall include the plural , the plur al the singular , a nd the use of any gender :;hall include all genders. 'rhe wo rd, "Mortgage," as used herein s h all mean Mortgage , De ed of Trust, Trust Deed, 17 =---------·-lr.-~-•':1 .1;:•~-· .~ 9!,1)!-JJ!IP I •• z • I. ·-~.:. •• ... ,.,,~, .-1,t ·~··· . ' I .-·'·· ("') lf) 0 'l) (\J 0 ----WWW@ • a ,. Security Deed or Deed tv Secure Debt. All obligations of each Ass j ~or hereunde1-shall be joint and several. 23. Mul t iple Counterparts. This instrument may be exe(";uted i1~ multiple counterparts, all of which shall be deemed originals and with the same effect as if all parties heret o had signed the same document. Al l o[ such counter- parts shall be construed together and ,;hall constitute one instrument, but in making proof. it shall only be necessary t o produce one such counterpart. 24. Governing Law. The parties agree th at the law of th~ State in which the Premises is located shall govern the performance and enforcement of this Assignment. IN WITNESS WHEREOf , the parties hereto have executed this Assignment on this ~ day of ~; , J-4lJ-. Address: Address: M 1 · I , ·71','.,( r , ~,/··,· ..... ):7 :"'}(..,,· -t,' OL'rv'B s ' McKEEN Husband and Wife 6203 south 194th Street Kent, Washington ASSIGNEE O'DONNELL, BRIGHAM & PARTNBR~ - NORTHWEST PROPERT l P t er Dove Street Suite 760 Newport Beach, CA 92660 18 ; ... .:., ~ .. _ = :-·~----"· '""'~.....r • ., f ."(° . ;--·-.· . V -~', - ':,· r') 11) C) :0 (\J ::) ,JJ 4 cc Z PC . $ 0 - STATt OF {;,.;,t..1,C:"llf!_v1 -"1 COUNTY OF u MA/6-~ ss. On this /0-f;i., ddy of E.i"L!i/e(//9,ei/ , 1981, before me, the unders1gned, a No tary~1c rli and · for the State of Cr!Jid~. d ul y comm issioned and sworn, person- all Y ~ppeared ,Tott1.1 o . '2 ',tMAIA/([1. '-, to me known to be the Ma nag1no Part ner of O'DONNEL L, BRIGHAM & PARTNERS -NORTH- WEST PROrERTIES, a General Partnership, the partnership thal executed the foregoiny instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument tu be t he free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership, for the uses and purposes t h erein mentioned, and on oatt, stated thal he was authorized to execute the said instrument . WITNESS my hand and off1cial seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. STATF. OF CO UNTY OF 5 5. ~X:~· Notary Public 1n a nd for the State of CAHPo~1 ,g., residing al ----·- On this /.::.:. ' 1 day of _ _,, ,.t.• ,,, .i '< , B <(/, before me, LJ1e u ndet5l.gned, a Notary Pubhc 1 1 an for tne StatP. of , . ,~--l t , r!!:!:_-i,, personally appeare DOUGLAS E. McKEC:N and OLIVE S. ,,1"1cK!,;EN, to me known to be the persor.:; named in the foregoing document, and ackno·~ledged to me Lhat they executed the same freely and voluntarily for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Witness my hand and official seal the day c!J!<I° •year , in this certificiltc first aboye written. . / /./.·.;,_:·. ~-·,; ! l I • I ,• " . ,; ' WDS /3lb ~r..t,, i I I j(,.~'i:.. .. ~<.J..l':.,t~Ylr.., , .. Not1.i;y Pu 1c in and , or t e:~t,4.1 e .. · of / :. . ,, ' r-esiping at~:.;:>'fJ}p:. 19 _._...__ :It ,:++, Mid II td6? f' ....... - -=~---·- ,· ~ ~, . '· . ~ ~-; •,; (") •.I) 0 '.X) N 0 Cl) --; .. '.:.. ~ ~ ill LS . . . . .. .-. . . . ..~ ,,7. --- ..... EXhIBIT A Lot 5, Block 5, Southcenter Corporate Park, as per Plat recorded in Volume 111 of Plats, pages 36 -42 inclusive, records of King Counlv. Wash in9 ton. -.... .~. ,,. - - --,. I " l -- • • D.S'DID!T Mm covmlff Agreet:ient made, effP ~ive as of u~ IS , 1996, be::.ween Q\,-endall Tenlli.nals, a Joint venture coarprised of Altino ?roperties, lnc., a Wa.shingtoz, corporatioc, aod .J. H . Baxter" Co ., a California li!P.ited partnership lberein.aftar •Gra:itors•). and Barbee Mill Co •• Inc .• a Washington corporatior,., aoo J . H. Baxter , Co .• a california limited part.ne.rshlp (hereinafter "Granteea•) . WHEREAS. Grantors are tbe owners of certain real property whose location is ~ly known as 4503 Lake llalshingt;on Blvd. l!i., Renton, Washington. the leg-11i description of which is attached hereto as EXHliHT A anc by thia reference incorporated herein ("Pa::::-cel A"). .. WHE.R.EAS, Grantee (Barbee Jllill c::,., Ice .) is the owner of certain real property c~y knolm as 4101 T..ake lla.shi..ngton Blvd . N., Renton. Wash.ington, the iegal descripti:iin of which is attached ~reto as EXRlB!T B and by this ~ference incorporated herein ("Parcel B"\. WHER.Et.S, Grantee (.J. !'I. Baxter " Co.) is t.he owner of certain real property cccimnly lcnown a..s 501S Lake Washington Blvd . li .. Renton , llasbiogton, the legal de9criyt.ian c f which is attached bereto as EXHIBIT C and by this refenna! u:corporated herein (Parcel ·c·). t,_.1/T~\/U2"1/Q.Jll/1 '1JMJ, 1 1 I , i I ::: i I • i !l i ' I ! -"' -ii • • ., - - ·-.-. • • • WYEREAS, Grantees desire to acquire certain rights in Parcel A. WHEREAS, the parties hereto vi~·:: to establish a lega.l dEescription as t o the location of aD easement for access and right of way, the terms and conditions for t~ maintenance of the roadway, and future relocation of the roadlray. FOR Ti':N ($10.00) DOLJ...AAS AND IN CONSIDER1JI0 2' o: the mut ual promises and covenants contai.~ed herein, t he suffici eucy of -which is unconditionally acknowledged by Granters anci Grallt.ees, the parties hereby agree as follows: I • ~ 01f -·---"i"l Granters hereby agree to grant and convey io perpetuity from the effective :iate of this conveyance t~ Grantees an easement for roadway uses and u tilities over, across and uoder Parcel A. The easement granted in this i nstro.lll>en t is appurtenant to Parcel Band Pa rcel C . II. DSINDT POIPOSSS The easement shall be for the purpose of providing access fo?" ingress and egress and for UDderground utilities between Parcel A and Parr.el B, between Parcel A and Parcel C, ,and between Parcel B and Parcel C. The roadway shall provi~ access sufficient and adequate for the purposes of Grantees' U9e8 to the highest use permitted by the tben current. zoning, i..ocllXli.::lg t.1'0 aceeaa pointa to the public higbvay fro. Parcel A. The eaaereo+-.a;iy be Wied by CSlfPl.l/'Pl"S/4:.2'1/COf/ 171901 .1 1 , I . • - - t l --.. I ---------· -- • • lhe owners of Parcel B a :id Parcel C, as well as their officers, employees, agents, .... __ .: ---- CIU&U ~ ........... -... .... .._ .... III . USl!IOm"f LOC.U!CII The ease111ent granted in this instrument is located on the ~~st 60 'eet of that portion o f Parcel A lyi ,g i-diately west of railroad right ·of·way. IV. ROADtQY ~ON 7he Grantors or Grantors• successors or assigns may relocate the easement across Parcel A at their sole discretion and expense provided passage bet-en ?arcel B and Parcel C refllains uninterrupted. and at least two access points rem.~in ~rom Parcel A to the public highway . Grantor o r Grantor's successors or assi gns further agree to I e cord a restated legal description for thle easement upon relocation . They shall also dedicate the easement t o the City as a ;,ublic right -of -way, if such dedication is required by the City as a condition for approval for any platt ~~= processes involving either Parcel B or ~arc~l C. V. ilR'"1QTrCS The easement granted herein shall exist in perpetui ty, aod shall run with the land and th~ title to such property, and shall inure t o the benefit of the patties to this Agreement , their respec tive heirs, successors or assigns. Grantees , their respective successors , beirs and usigna , covenant with Grantors, their respective aucceseon , hein and assigns that Grantees, f roai time to tiae, um at all title• After (SWNl /ll"S/4U'1/r:r:./llltOJ ll 3 , ' I. • - - I I -.--r- -- • • • the effective date of this inst~nt, at ~rantees' own cost and expense , wi.l.t repair anci t..aint:ain, i .o a pLOl,><H, -. , ...... , s ::-lterl i ke manner, the above -desc ribed roadway. As between the Grantees. the costs of repair and 111aintenance shall be equitably a?porl:ioned based Ul)OQ each party's use of the easement. VII. C\Mi'DID~ llQll'fS Of ~a Grantors aDd their succe ssors, heirs aDd assigns :nay continue tc .ise tlle easement for teir r,wn purposes so long as their t:::.e is not inconsistent: with th~ purpose of this grant. Each party hereto wiil be responsible for claims or damages resulting from. or arising out of the use of the easement by such party a.nd sna :1 indemnify and hold all other parties hereto harmless from a.~y el~ims or damages arisir.s t ~erefrocn. IX. lll'fllK IGIQlllll'l' This Agreement shall constitute the entire agreement bet~n the parties and any prior u:iderstanding or representation of any kind preceding the date of this Agreement shall not be binding upon ei tber party except to the =ent incorporated in this Agreement. x. Any modification of this Agreement or additional obligation asS\lllle<l by either party in connection with this Agreement s .ball be binding only if evidenced in writing by each party or an authorized representat~ve of each party. fa.'9.l/nf4$/4720/CDIIHlW>). l) 4 I . • - - --. ---------~------- • • • • D. ln Ule event ot a.ny concroversy, ciaia, or cispuce re~dci:.iy LV tl::.is i.Lstru:aent er its breach , the prevailing pany shall be entitled to recover reasonable e.xp---llaes, attorney• s fees and costs . This Agreement s~.all t:;ind and inure to the benefit of the :::-espective heirs, persODal representatives, successors, and assigns of ~he ;:>anies. 1t is ag~ that this Agreeaent sb2ll be governed by, construed, and enforced in accordance with the lavs of the state of lQshingtan. and venue shall be in Ung County. :r:rv. a:n'Xars Any not.ice provided for or concerning this Agreement shall be ir: writing and shall be deemed sufficiently given when sent by c~rti fied or registered ma i l if sent to the respective address of each party as set forth at the begi.n:l.i.ng of this Agreement . xv. The titles to the paragraphs of th.is Agree:aent are solely for t.he convenience of the parties .3nd shall not be u.sed to ei::ploin, :IIC>dify . siaplify, or aid in the inteq>retation of the provisions of this Agreement. indicated below . s I. • - ·- ·! STATE OF ~n«n'Ca COClliiTY OF DJIG -- • • ~ TERKIJIA..S, a j oic.t vent.ure coapriSf.d of Al tiDo Propert. ies, !nc. , a Vasbi~= corporatiOD. a:.d J. B. Baxter .. Co., a ca.:.ifornia li.Jilited pa.rtnership AL'!INO .PROPERTIES, INC . .,, ,J)W;.#jr ~ ~ as. BARBEE MlLL CO. , INC . , a waa.h :.ngton corporation By , ltal&--bc~~ J. H . BllTEa 6o CO .• a ~lifo:rni.a 1· · ~ By: l ce.rtify tll&t I knew or baYe Ktiafac;;ory evidence that the perSOQ8 ~iDg before ae mid aald,D!J W. adalowledi.:,Deat aTI!! the peraollil wboee true •i;_gnatures appear <lll t.hi.s don_.nt. ;__,lt"n"\/42:Xl/OCIII 11)NJ . 11 6 • ~-; Am,:.,. - - ' . ' • I I -- • • • On this ___.13,_ day of f' c.!) . 1996, before ~ personally appearel,('ll jr . . to~ knowtl to be the P • e:<:,,:xfeo;t: ot A.Leino· .-ropen.i.cs, .i:n<.;_. LI>t corporation that executed the vithi:l and f oregoing inst.ruaent, and acknowledged the said instrument cc be ~ fr= and volunc.a.ry act and deed of s a i d evrpoiation, fo:. tbe uses ~ purposes t herein l!lentioned, and on oath stated that they -.ere aut!lorized to exec-.Jte said io~trument and that the seal affiited . if any, is tbe corporatt- seal of said corporation. WI~S my hand and officia l seal r.eret o affixed t he day and year first above written _ II ASH I.NGtot,1 STATE OF e.\l,H'QRaiil, COUNTY OF UNG ss . J certify that 1 know or have satisfactory evide.::lce t hat the persons appearing before me and lll3.lti.ng this aclcnowl ~t a~ t he perso ns whose true signatures appear o:i this document . On this _]£day of £J...u•~ . 1996, ~fore me p<:rsonally appeared k4w N..et>T . to -lcnowo to be t he ?.._~ .. Jt o .;. H-aa.xter ., Co ., t.he corporation t t exec.Jted the within and foregoing i.nstru:aeDt. and acknowledged the s aid i.nstnment to be tbe free and vol11nury act and deed of said c orporation, for the u.ses and puz'po8es therein mentioned, and on oath sta.:ed that. t~y -re authorized to execute said instrument and chat the seal affiied, if any, is the corporate s ~al of said corporation . WITNESs ;,;ry hand and offi"ial seal hereto affixed t.be day and yea r first above ~~itten. • 7 ) l I I. • • . .-.... - - --- • • • All cbat por.:ioc of Govenaecc ~ 1, Section 32 , Township 2t loort.h, ~ 5 East , if ..... ir. IC.1ng Count), and of second Clase Si>n :::-e La.Dds adjoining, lying ·-terly of Jlortbe:-n Pacific Railr-:>ad right-of-way; EX~ that ponion, if any, of said Sblre Lands ly~ oorth of the westerly producti= of the north line of said Governaent Lot . ... _ r'~s.. • I . • -- - -. -........ -- • • • right -of-way line, l00.01'; chence • S9•2•'J6• M 1019.16', aore or less, to the In&er Barl>or Li.De of t.ke lCa•bingt<lD; theoce a 44°20'00" E along said Inner Barbor L.1ne 102.95' to a po.l.b!: iraa which the true point of beginning be&rs S 59•24'36" B; thence S 59°24 '36• E 1013.23', aore or less, to the true po~ .>f beginni.ng, EXCEPT portion thei:eof described a.e foll0118: Beginning at the u·iae ;.oint of beginning of the above desc:-ibed property; theDct! S 29°44 • 54" M along the lily line of the llortbezu hcific bilway :ocipany•.;. rig~t-<'f -vay 100.0l'; t:bence • 59•24 •36• 'If 100.01·, '.:hence N 56°28 • so• E 1 11 .16' t o a point froa. which the tnie point. of beginning bears S 59°24' 36" B a distance cf 50'; ~ s 59°24'36" E so· to tbe true point of beginning. and EXCEPT that portion of said shore lands lying northerly of the northerly line of said Governaent Lot 5 produced westerly; situate in the COunty o f King , State of Washington. • I· • . . . ' .... Man · . '.ftat.A >: ~ . .- 8 "' • • • LAND CORNER RECORD GRANTOR: LAND SVKVEYOR: This COl'OQ' rc,;ocd corrccdy ~ work perfo«med by me or I.Qld,:r my directioa in confoml&ll<e witb the Sur.cy RCC0!1lin& ACI. AOO!tESS: BUXTON K. HAJUUSON, P.C. Load San~ca nd M.ppillt JOI Jl~ .\Vt. S.E_. S-.ib 560 lkll<"a< Wa,lil•cto• 98004 \ GRAIITE[: PUBLIC LEGAL: TWP~ N. RGE! [ (WiUamcec Mcn:fttr1 I CORNERCOO€· V-6-1 (Sc<-ont..c~o/LCRJ ADOJTIONAL ID!:'mflf:'R (t g . 8LM dn1ina100 lo, lh< """'1. <Ir«! ;olcO«OOn. pl~ lllmC. b1oc1<, lex. cu: I Mander Corner, So11INATES: N: 196,769.44 O!U>ER · Wl<f l'lortb OaTU~I I BSAJl.ll<GS NAI) 83 (1991 ) ~ 7111:7 -11!.......-::-~w-_._......-_., h_..---.-,,. CORNER 1NfOJL'1ATION: ~ .. lbc _. 1><1 .... w ,,..,.,de 111, ro11ow.,, ,.-.,., ,.pn1~ ,r,c '°""' f)/ tMln!J Corn£! }(i::wton. j2) [Yidsf« {0111119 •Lill< (of!{!, WU) fe?U Pt'!1S!f:1"°4 Je[,,r91ttt* Pie~ ~tic~ n:..rn.ba't."ic p,tb of yovr d.~ioa :at('Q(dinJJy. tr Jrdditiorq,! ,p.,c.c h f'Ctded. "k the t.x\. Fo. lti"n, l . d1 .... "lrn fk' ~rCTCnc;a; Abo. pt<a,.:tdc: tht .!1'0'1· rt!crcACl: k> am~ of rcwtd. 1r ~i~ir. che 1Ut'lo~·o:"", tie'd bOok tM> J p~e no and 1hc d.ac of ..,,nit tSic:t ~ b,lit'I( ()f lhi) fO(Jb lo, lhc rtq\urcnicnts of~ S.1Jn-cr lttCOf~lllC ~Cl ) (II Pertinent Corner H,;<on·: i 90J LAKE WASH!J•;GTON GARDEN Of [OfN ( V i I. Pg.SI) 1921 La~c Washin..:ton Shore Lands (Pg ?9-JO l 1Q41 KCAS lr°a'<nc toordinaic shcc,.. 196!, Semon 19 b,col.down I>) H~ P Jones j?l E•·idtntt found 21 tbt (otnfr: /;ont /3) Coraer Ptreer~ali<>g IMor!IJtlioo: lbr rccsrabhsh,J po>1llon along the soulh lint of 1h, SW : . 4 ,,f Sc<rion 29, ~-as cased open holding clrr monumm, foond m.irl:ing lhc So<lth I '4 (Omer lhcr<0 1: 3nJ 111m,ng me 1ni-t 1Rd an11lc of the 19~ I Sh0« Lands map,. from the monumrn1 foul>d m:ri:,n~ thr NE &c11on coma or Sccuon 29 . The M<311dcr Corn« "as then calculated by huldm~ the ,n,cr><d ,h.unrc from lhr !9: I Shur< land; m"l's along lilt to01putcd soulh iin, of the S V. \ J Sci 5 .. , 5 .. <uncmc mu:,11mcn1 w, J" IK.sH2p tn c2><:. a.s a Witnn• Coratr (N: 196,163.38, E: 1.301.8.l Ul \, 2%9 9& fec1t••lcl l) of the <ll1l'putcd position o{\11, Mund« Com«. MOIIUlll<nl utd 10 NA D · 83 I l'l'll) nm-or~ l O 1<1-<1~ A ho. refer to ( ,ty of ~c\\cvuc S1auon o,,, C Aid> Su 01 St llll-1 04H. tl \ i I i r : I I • • < l:l) C") (,l'J Q a, N if) Q l'-a; • • • \ M.WI. IBJ CQllNDLOC.\]JoN l!LOW ANP nu.. IN TBl <;og."@t COOI !Y,$ Qtl JKI onm, SIM; For ,;aiicrs • 1bi, ~ of two 1irics, 1be com<f oocle is tbe ~ coordinaa: tba1 oonc:,ponds to Ille appropria iarie,-=tioa of lines. For oornrn tbM iR GIiiy <m ooc lax, die corntr c:odc is tbc line cksigDaioo me! tbt related liDc ~ i.e, a comer ao lil!,e 5 betwem "B~ a "C" is~ ec-s. Fer comm llial at"e bdwtai ~ me ccmu woe is boll, lil>C S<g,nmu; i.e, 1 coma in 11,c SE 11• ~tbe SE 114 of Scttioa U is~ MN 4-5. . A • C 0 r ' " J I( l • • 0 ~ 9 • I r V V " .It T' z ,, 0 ~ 0 • • -+-:--:--·4--!--} .... ; •• !_jr" -+ .. : .. +-.i_:.-}-. ... }-+-+-• -!-i-!-..!.Z.,:. ..:.;,_:_ -!.-~-_!._3&~ .!. .... ~-• -+-:.+ .. -+-!-+ .. -+ .. ~-+ t .. :-+-+-!-~-: ! .. ~.... .,. t 1 t t I 1 I ' r f • r \ • I I • \ 1 I Z J • f • 7 I t Ill II 11 U t• .. NI 17 II • JO ;JI 1Z JJ 2f I'S RCW S8.09.060 (2) ~ires the following iltfonM!lon °" this form ; 111 accunue desaiption aod loc.ation. in refenncc to~ corner position. of all monwncots and ac=sones (L) found a1 the corner and (b.) placed or rq,1-'1 at the comer; (c.J basis of bearings used to dcscnbc or locate Sllch 111onumcnts or =ric:s; and (d.) corolilly in formation that may be helpful IO rc!OCOie or idct!tify the corner position. .... --~··· ............... ~~·--' \ \ I • • . · ... -~~ ! I . ~ 11,J i~ ii· ,m oc ~ c Q ~ ~ 0 '" z :J Q' 0 ro Q' I :? 15 ' ,_ ,~ ,o i L_ r~s ~_Q}- z.: o.;· le--;-' ,'0 --2 I V) "' s Id y •. , ( wj:>l·· ?: r...: ~ "' ~ ~ 0 '" Q' "' i 5 .;~ ·-·~ ? _._.:: {f" p 0 V' ·:--G~.,.:t,{~ GOv'"f LD1 , :Li.(1:-.. c2ccicir·ncc "'5 j·.ly -' i ' ·'' '. I / -i 1 [QU',CC" 0)' j ' / ~ /_ _>e;j Q't,C""O ,1r'; :;~; ,~~> /,,.-/ ,~59·::i3 44 ·w /~-----. :··.i .. :1l: ·'· ,0 ~ -,; .. r· '-'"'" ·""" "r qf' e,"7 ,,,,,.,-__ ,,08 / ••,0 ;,',,, i ·"/:/"' ,ne c,c ~ I, / // or P~o~"~of '.-' I . ' 's;;\1 pj) 'SC'" I ,,_ . -, ,oo.cc q" , • ., D' CO'K ~·, -' , , '',W'' , " """ v'" PROP UNE~1::el I ,' [ "' 29 6f.O 'ui I (1){,1-% t,•h, i {. "5806' ,, · ,u "' . .r.~, 'R -"<J'oe' 0 ,' ,, _ c,,.'l!I I / 1 -1eoo;// _I' --_ or,-RA"p,ccNrrn 11 Nt "x ".,, ... ~ 7 I 1 J L - 34 "' ,.-.--,;/ -,,, ',--•. -··'·'"" ' ,.{\ .~. 682> / t' ,-· .,,,. ,, ' 1r''J/',O "/ ,, -'I ..... ·;/.;,flt' \i:'},' /~ k // / "mu,"°"' --.T ~ .. '"''"',. . ' l' ·,"' / < I' ~s., ~::~ ~'""""' o?' ' I '·"" sew' "' WC' Cl ,/,;[' N ,, ,~·/ 'Xi'{"";;,,;;. j ' '"" ,0 c'.\:°0"? POINT SlE_ SHFFT ) f.~lltfl''~-~(;, ' ~~1~1~T OF ~:,'' P~!fCEL ~A.Pf ~ _•. • Iii A93 l:::L....:_9f,1)d!3 9 ~ 1 :soo:,G:::1 ec,_; 3S !74 S' i ,-. ,,:· •1' ·~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ., ; f'i,S , '}ci , ( ,aC'\' \' " _:•;;:,.. " ,,. '·r· . , .,, .. ,~ . . . j--" ·"'', ,,, , . ,,.,. ,lli , ' ' ... • . " n•' ~ ·,· ,, .+"" ''".; ,,.,,, ' . . . ,,, . . ff} /' . } I, Y,'(', -,;-'J-111305' 4\91'l~ "-...2! "'" ' , ' " . ' '" ,, ' ' ----or , , ,o. " '·/' , / ,, ; ~~. ",,,''" -, . "'/ ,..-o30'23 l4'E---j _ ~ , . f.'CP ,.i!(· _ ./ , _ .. 00 .:Y /'I '-..II-S,C > 70.H' 9\ oCS·F(.'C' -Naa·1-a·~"w ._1·oas.·.f7'.. N1FsccooN· ·---- sou111 uHt sec 29 T I-/ .;F -,;,. ,,__:-'dtQC' I :_c:{ I'; ) _ _)v -:-!')~t{~ DCCV -J ,.~ I ~~1 ' ; NO'.ll_r.J.,, ;,i~' 5.f;;; -~~~ fl"Jc; :c,;., IS ~ <. IV ;:r ·,:;,OP C N[ H1 r:01-· 1<-; ~ ·r ,v or rRo~-L•!<[ nHi1n\'fli'J ~itw~t\R , 1 4" ~' / J ,)I ., 02' . , < , o . m R 16's•·" ·1;, I 1 ; I . / , /!;5 ·--~·:-:ii· r "' 203s.cO, ~ 'V,,a,S'. if' · -4051' fl ' .' i·' \_ .. :' . ,co,,'"',,' ,,,,.:,-' ',.,,;, ~ .. 81,02' /, /, / '; SW)5'24"E::"' ''"'~ c,,.''··" • j '· or.ccii\." /'.l}l("' ,,'~ '?1:::2'" ' , : '.'. ~?i~f ikiiw !.Y-1,{j ·,,,,,,,,,,,•co, ·s,,, ".,t": Y , .. ,,,,,,,,,,,.:, --.ft/: . ,;,; . ' " ,; ' "'" ,,. ·: "'' RIGHr..:or -WA y r 1~, . , , ,, ,, .• .• "" '" "'""""" . I //}" . . . · fj . c~,~l'.J1 ... .. · 4U;i4;>4?-'_;.J--~'.-;,. /' ; , " ' ·' .. ,,:_'_:,"; ;~ / ~ft ,<_u I.ill,' IS Q c -'-( ::!::'.:. ;.7 · · . " ; 9 '• . ·' ' . ,, ",;. ;-' I , ,, '''"' ,, r.J.. /_ff'~' "'y' ,e i '~ "' ,., .. ,· ' . <' . ., P,N ~r-·~-f: 1 P.OU .;: \< ·;;;/:. '.". . l,tj '" e,, """'/:?' / ;, ; ., ; '1 ;,C, ' /§ I "' ,,.,.. ,,o 0 p m Qc '! 0 " ~ 08"49':)9" "< = 2065.oo· T = 1.5...q.,49-... •. .r·J-~18 .. 1.':,' /) ~ .'t ,/''< ,,J§ .·· ,' " .,.. /:, . ' " ' "" '", " }',, ,, ', . ''"' '. .,,,, ' " ,; V -~" rr.Jt,1: /... \/'1 · ';'<CJ'<ZL 1.·,:~ P1.,.,., , co·,c_ ,, 1:-1 •·.,. I)'·' N r.•:_,·; '/\C·r f..rc ar ,:;cv, ,or· 1 ··_,IC ~--PUlfl I (r HH;1W,JIN(; 0.-'"I..RCCL ".I." SfC (')f GCr./T I OT 5 & POINT Dr fFGMllN'.; l'I 1-'AfiCH "i:i" ~;T.t,,KING NOTE:; 0 ~£~· .Fl\J ''·.,,--nLM(INC'.:,: f,s·,' ro·.1-1c ) 'N/ 1'i1)/'.li ·111 DN • ';" 1:,1 1,1!.'~ cut,s ·:,c;c. :i : r;L :>T. & , rs-;-:.ye R[r[.l{_TO c1-·( _{;,~ f-iF!·rul·J HCRIZ:)tHAL (.l,i:. ruM NP!' .=;:E:Ff:R 1·:.J R.'::CO°'D ')I SUl~V[Y IN E!OOK !.\; /..I i'AGI:. 1.-~6. KIN:-:: COI..MTl', N/1.S··llt~GlC)t,J OI· SlJf1'/~·-: ,-:crrn [,") ~;HOR 1 I·'! Al FIi E NO LU\ 93 O'J 7 Self'_ \HilP.T !'l..q DOC\;1,ffl:~ /'JO i lJll-;;c,.-n157 Ill I ( ·I 1:J Jc \IC/J '' !-.! \Ii.~:.:) CJ. R/W M/.,' R[hl-citJ TO Krn··lYDAlf-" o..;:+:· Em 6; 0,'\T[C f\PRIL. 12, ,~.:c~ ' '..!" ~ T•I C:c=.>G CO:;, I'., : ~ I" <,? .J' , /.:-J>4'' !""';,.s-t,£ "':Y;j'· ,, .. / , ., . , \ i . C:::"t;,,,, , I ! 1' • I.,,' '''"''IC"'"' °' "'" I ',, I' ,,... ,; , ',, , "" :;',:;.;~,:;; , 1 ! i . IMS il?llM' rn 1.· ::~ t'R:,r, i.r ,, ,- 8!.CG :::~:<l IS 5 8 Cf" GP('.)p c 'IE 2 STOR'r' IIO;;'.,I '~ GRAPHIC SC:ALE' I ~ :'.' ~-·r __ }¢ --~-T ( IN FEET ) 1 "nc;I, a 200 ft ll•IS ':.illfi\•11 WA:i i-'~llf(J-/M! I) Will! /, WI,[) TC.11):_',C·:.J (Tr'~:C:F. •;[COND) ['_C:1:·rrwN1:..: IHf~Jl)fl IE ~'i[f;',AL ~-;:: . ;.u_.1_th l,H IJ f f../,ET,,CL· 1 iSEJ: i.;/1:;1; ;J':~[)."./\ L[!,~; i ';CL.A:\!·<.; ADcli 1:;nH·JF M(TI 10[• '01': :.. __ ;·1t:L:::•:ifU,\/ll~:,f DAIJ>. Ahl.! t..i'.·,J,X;T[[i IC T 1':" WAS•·il-i-:; (!l·J s-AT[ PL/\t,;~ C.CiORHIN/.\ i~. SYSTf],'. NORT·I zo:-r::. (•.p,.) !JJ/":! J?i~c; CI_Jx·tiF RE\JTON ·,:;~_,jUN,AI ,'JAIJV -'rn .. ·~ .~'li'l..1.), ~e~1-·l.i: fliH9J (GOV. (GOV. LOT 5) A LOT 1) PORTION A PORTION OF THE OF THE THE SEC. SE 1/4, SW NE 1/4. 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF THE SEC 29, 32, TWP. TWP. 24 N., RGE. 5 L, 24 N., RGE:. 5 E:., W.M:' &" w:M. AUDITOR OR RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE I ell lui ····c01,J lf···:,,nw 0ny r_,r ~ Rno!,: JDS u! ')vvc:y:; 01. µ~11,_~j,-<,. R <~H, PG::::[, & 111 i ~J J:"i(;~;, INC ·= Y'1:' c: ~:r.t.A ',1 o1 lhr: r C''.JUCS\ ,~' c::-:it;NT ( AIJf),-OF C? D,VI'.; rn, \)F ;:;,::-;:ow s ;;_ F:l ~CT JMS -6alJ<.& ;"";,:i,~'lty P.11di~or ,..,, kJ'~y ~,tl&l"ON Sur,0,,nl(ir.d~nt -,f P.r>u,rds; SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE ,1:, rrcp coi"1Cclly tqJ1-;c;cr•l'.; ~ ':vvc.:y ··r,r..cc LV ·r,'.: (;' unJ':'.r ·r,y r~ircr_\1011 n :~c:r-1fc 'Tw· :·,· ,·11\1; \re 1,::1J11(·.l!I'~ of i'lt SurvP.v .~!-'<:ordinc An ,1' Iii~ requ,:,sl of vv'-c"":" '<·'-'· 1 ,lr/J· '-'.L r· I I I '". . ) '--<. .. \, vl>'..!X.,.) C:e"r.,.:"ficc:.e ',:::, H",,", qq • ~ --------------BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. CIVIL ENGIN[FP.S & , AND SUR'J[YORS ?009 MINOR AVE. Ei\ST (206) 37:5-41•1" SI Al 111, WASHINGTON 1-E!00-93$-0008 -,:tC;cJBu er· suRv? JAG,·OEVELOPMENT ·.·, -'~~r,:·: •::;:0UNIY .. -:··w:\'·~,i-llt}CTA·J 96145.D(f ?! ~1 ,·or-~. ORA Wt-.J 8Y D/,.8 '.k .. J.1_,.D8-9Y ,J,:JlJ 98107 5513 F'/•X# (206) 32J-ii X, L MJ\11 1NrCJQ,;',~-ll~C.{:0M C; CC/<,£.U Ll"f S/\11 SCA' f-·, "-2co·· ·--1·s.L:_~s.-1 .:.:J 20C002099 00005 135 ll&, A A PORTION .Of THE SW 1 /4 SEC. 29, TWP. 24 N., RGE 5 E., W.M . • i.;"R111 t,,·QRP1 .:-i-~orc:;~%i:c,;0i1--.-... . _~,,/· -_:?-_._,,~~\f/~~:ic:;,~~i~: .. ·.' 1/:: .. .; 4 ,-J-" \~C,,~::3:l.~ED-(;RI[) ~CAL[ .'. /·' .-."·FACT;)R _:·· . , .. ~RAfifil~ • scAlE •m -~ IN !-Ul) 1 ir,d1 ~ 200 fl STAKlr-,.,G i\OT[S O SE I ~;_4p:-.~0 r.o~. .·. l'l"i w_/":;AP I S#:."·'J·nv. / / / ,•, ··.>,•":, /L ,/ ,• / / _,/· / / ,s·· /..,,lr ~<v '?· 'v / ·o:i:)a ·.'J.rJ'!99':="'-IO '? }~991i!~8$,. "''!-''·.· ~ •:.:....c..::_, / ·:.-. / ,/ / / ,/ / _ .. -:·· /-- , ..... / /< /' /~;~-.: ~&' /'-(0:;. , 0~ -<~ /', .. yY / . ,/ / cc' :{;r· ·:0 .. (.,:(' ,,. "--::-:,;."' ,a.._> .,{ ,, '!/--"?:: .. ct -~· ·--?\~-~-.. ~/ ~- ·~:.i.J1 ·4e·45"·~- ·-.10:-:co· ->~t_: __ _ d . ;r0 ;}.-· 0 · -,; 4 11 ~;:;a~ Wl)CI: i,ri-.::;i.., -··~'l£ . \ 1 0 ... '10 CA,.. 1·. ;;-c,, t-'I", ",:)YI~ -1· ~L~~ ;,:;r;~-1~:; ~ \r:· I I I ! ' i I ! ./ {._..-~i'i/ :3;_tr~r·1~t/~' 4 ·'' I ,/ 1 / ,.-ht.~,; .(-.. :,0:0 •• 1<_, 2 6' • I I _.. ~. <).1-:··f'"~:,P L.l~k •. --·~-"=·/·, I O.·· -· ..'Cle)· .. · ' .vi(.' ; _-.-·· 1,-.") ..l.: :,,.-_. I -· ., I~ f . G' WUOci 1-t'ICc° LINl;.,f', .· , -: :/ 55>Q·~''t:, ,.-./-:( ;j:-. / '.)tu;:,;;rr,,~:~~ ,< c • / , • t~lf.: /7,,-, · .. '1\ti;~,*: k?-;:' ';>3/J'·l'.:,' EJL'):., CM<CPY IS "I 1-'l<Oi' LIN\ 'i .. ,', 11,:,9_,-r <::FT . .-Acc,-, P11~ '/'1/U l(lli'n .,· .-.iw,· 1.,--:'1 G(l\/T IUi co\/-LCll :i-- ,1 /; '11-/ }! ! i' w ;v,e. · ,i ::\r,; .3 ./. I J"'--/ . ·t,_ ' /"-r (~ ,, / ." ,: ' /~/~: ,''/ :v; I ./ VI-. .-.-,_.,_ ff!:?.:/. '<.}' /·~ · ·· .. ti If} 0 .:-· •-. ,,_,\; I f/c~.,· //)·1:· I J~ /r~~;',;-,': ·. .-, I /-" ·0"<:,· f.r I 7• ,(· ~-:{ . ,{!/ §1 ~----- / fl/ r;~·. /·.·1" .-. I -~.'~~~~:' ., ,._ .. j, / ~ / f~\:_~ I f,I · rn 'PCS• ' -1"i-fN(:[ ' )'. /, .' cco 4 n1 i er r'Rff• 3·.-, 'I ICIU'C fl J/.:l' GRCKL~ i'L• .I.NI' "JIKI' IH :~:JNC D~ r1 ll' ,:., Mot, c~·, -1~.1 ,..~ ,~w, & Ill, i- r:>-5 .~ ~I i~~~;.:): 1 __ , ; }06-!0.l. 3-:'-C7 ·)t{ ~:° /' / ,/ ,;F ./,,<}· // o·" -"'~' "0/i/'' 0-0~--J '.Or;, ·sJi '·W46"·'tr" · :t 1:10.0()' ,t:~\ .. , . &e!!;~ " ('' ~'.'~( I SC'l18E IN · ! ~15l'lfll"C: ·1'.rn1:.: jl,.fONU\'Et,l -· ( ( ~-.... ,_. ef' -") .,{-c •" c; AUDITOR OR RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE 1-kd r:1: rr:;.111'"' lhi.; joy 1,f n ~loo~ uf ~),.ir ~·ey:, ol :.;CHJ" ~.'I.IStl. f";(lf:l) N '"IU!INGS, l~:C , I(< nt M (1( \IW ':'(;" l, [.'T (;1)1J~J ;·y Alll't[T(Jf~ c-~ O'Vl~,·;"H~ s°JI --~r,-.:JI{_)'_; !r LL' \."'"1-'."IH': &EE PA.GE ,.o;,ri'.y /\u~·tc,, •J ';1it,·:'r11,ten !t'r · ::,t ~·~cc-··,')'; -ly" SCI Sr-E:T 1 POINT SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 11,;. n-cr· ,~,r-r"c\ly r"".r,n:ser,:s '" .,;,_: -rey ,·11Q:.:,~ ·~" :"· .. :· (;• v (j(:r ,1y ,·ir,~r:10· iri c,ydurrr1~:· :':' viii" u,,~. rr·011i•e,rr10r1-- c,' tr~, '.',1,rvev Pcco•zfr,n ,\ct t1\ t,·.:; rer:u::st .:,I q1 \/ucu,u IJw I l.10~. r, \ I \ ·. .J,. \, \_,,~ \ '/ Cuti~ut,: th 21.""\1,~ ,-I '---_ -_-:;.._:;, -rLNCf cor~ 1,; · >l'·.f "-·-cr.r-P.or· <:JR • ~ BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. Cl\~l ~~IG.NEERS &: ~Mm :iURV["i'ORS 2009 MltW~ AI/E. LASl (20fi) 12.3-4'44 51.ArTLE, WA'.-;HINGTON 1-BOO. ':l3~ 0508 I ; : .'-I rtlllNIJPINW'IH·CAi"' ~t-:"J OYL[< :;,'>).1." ._fA< \IN( K~. 81"'. ~! 55.£.1-.. ~l)· ~: .-.-::·· ~~-~l'/.t!:-:"'.:0iK .Kit{:~,:·: G:RflFH:HOT '>, I m_N rcN;· l)f~AWN HY ," 1, ·'\ RETORn ()F sur,ycy' , , JAG,-·DEVELOPMENT .• / ./ ·---··''KING .COUl'JTY _,-. w,~::,11J~:c:.:-if.r:: . ~ DAB Dr.:1.::: 11-,;.-·os 0g J08 ,\)6145.pD 98102--}513 ,\q (?06) .\'.>_\ .• 71J'.J t t.'A!, · 't·lf"(l(<~fr{ht·.C COM CHl:.Cl<[D BV SAH s~:.t1J F: 1"=20d SHcET 2 u{ 3 SOUTI i 8.1\RCEI_ . (cl/\RBit FOR,S,(Pi<OllUCIS, 'NC.) A\I l}!i;.~ POR"ilCN.:·b· GOVt .. "'\mH.N' 1.01 1, S~CllON J2, rovtNSHIP 14 NO~.J+!, '~ANCI 5-_:fAST .. W_t.,L. IN ;,Jf.:G COL;r-.. TY, W/ISJIINC,TOhl ANl or ~[COND :'.LAJS.-:t°l lORCtA.NOS ADJ01N1ttG· [ ,-'t!'"-1(;_ .wt.-.~ I lRL v 01· IJORTH[Rr-..· .·'PACIFIC RAILrbAD R_1,Gfli-OF-WAY':'. ·:.-. EXCE 0 T .~<{: PoR-i-i°oN, 11 A..rti,:·\j!"'··sP.10 SHORELAfms 1.w-1c ~oRrn or THE .Y..~'31ERL Y.i""1ROD1JCT19~· or THC NORT11 LIN~:·D~ q11; y(l_Yt-.f.'.J'i.~~~-1 1 OT . -,,·S11UATE IN .THE CGUN!,'ror K'NG, _ _..~i-Alf rn: WASl(I_NC-101~ MIDDLf_ f>/\.8.,C°FI_ (QU[f10Ai _ ISRl.ll~.A-1 Si ~HI\T PORTION or GQV[RN·f,.;~·N.i~·r(-/. ~ !N ~~:CT'Ot~ 2;:-.:r.•)W':i.S'\;·~ 24 .. :/ NORTH, RANGE 5 I_AST W.1-1-.. AlvD SHORl:.LA.NL) ADJOlr~1NC c.. YI~,,_; WEST!;.F{Y OF THE NORTHl:.Ri~ PACIFIC RAILRO.t,D R1GHT-·Of.":--WAY A"JD SO,/ l',:$l'~; OF A l INF D[SC:i718[[) A" 'OLLOWS: . . BEGINrJlt,,G 1\T rHE QUAf.;:lU? C:ORNrR mi ":HE S0L7H LINt OF St.I[) '.';f·C[tDN HiENCF NC·H IH H'.J"Stl'Jti" WEST Al.ONG I Hr. sou IH I IN/-Uf-~; '.I~ UJ I .::3·, 1,113.0", f[[T TO TI-IE 'NESTER!'( I ·~JE OF SA!D NORTll[RN F,\C;FIC RAIL h'OAD RICI i l or -WAY; THE,\CE t~CRIH ;:.r44"'.J4"' l"AST 849.62 rct.T ALDr,G SMJ f.:Chl-Cr-W.h." u·~:: TC/\ rc:i:~n f-+1--H-,NAf~f":Fi Rff[RR[D TO A:"; POINI A; Tfi[NCL CONIINtl!l'-IC NORTII 2'1'4~'54" Fol...ST )000", f-EET TC TH[ ~RU[ POINT er GEW~NING OF !Hf I INF ,.;ER[IN DESC:RIGCD; n-,rNC[ SOL;l:l :-J07H''.i0" V/}SI }'.}/.J7 f-~r · ro /~ r'DINI ',','HIC~ -J:A--1S NCir<TI-! 59·2~'56" Wf-_ST 10D.01 r[[T rROM SAID POINT t,: THE"NCE ~,ORTII 59·2,r':_,5"' 'l";'fSl 10 '">-ff U":lt..E'i HM-WOR :...IN•= /\J~:l ;Hf- f-ND or SA.[) LINE l)f-_'.)CRll--'':()N; .. ·-:-. A_:,_so TtlAT PORTION Of-SAID GOVF~~rNT LOT ~;··~Yi'r:iG:~ou;1-1r_A:;1u-i:..Y t;r LAK[ WASHiNG;CJN F-K·Ul_[VARD, wtSTERL':' OF SECONDA1--r·i=-s.1An HG•iWAY NO. 2A i\ND NORTHW:.Slt.RL . .,.. o(· P·ff RIGW-,Qr WAY CF PLieiJ..C ';TAH 1-rGI IWA Y NUMB!-''-; 1 AS F S :·A8flSHFI) IJY DU:15 ·~"*.CCl~l)~ :) UN Pt R ~r C()l-(lJ't~(; N::). 565?-iOE. .. ·. . ~;'1:JAF N TII[ CCJNT'(_:'01 K11'-,'G, !;!J'.<l·f_· Of W•\S!JfJGT,Jl>J NOC:TII 1°N,C[-l .. (J.1-1. GAXTsl':° & CO\IP~NY) 'HAT POR"':IUd'bf:.GCVlHN",'l~l I L0'1 \. SI-CllON 29 1 ,.TOWN.:O}~IP 24 WJ'<L'J. RANGE !:J [AST, w.M:,.iN r.:ir~c; COUI.,'(, W/,SH!NC"I:CN 1\Nif··.t,CJ".(XNI,.•'' SHOR;;'"L ANDS Or Tllf" SfGONIJ Cl A'i!l 't~ I l<ON.f,' T1 l[:~t.OI.'. L YIN:, wt"c..'-::.1, ~: Y T>-JF tJORIHU~t-..: F'ACl<IC r-:At:WAY-.(().11,(=:'.l.l,bl-Y:';;".RIGHl Of: WAY ,\\I.FY i Y!·,C NORTH[,~:~H:.1'\LY or rnr r:i1 OWINC 0 /JFSCRl8!-D Lil-,·[·.: .. ,, .. ,; m.CIN'~H~G AT T-!: r;;uMH:'"k CORN!-R ON :1-1, .. SOU'li).IN" ()I ~=-i:it1·:;H·110N :,:.i: HE.NCL t~CRTf" H'.PJ/-L:,(i"" 1\1~:, I Al.()t-.JC Tl I[ SOUTH '.1'-lf;. r_ir ':,,I\ID L..·J. :J. A DIS[/\NC[ Cl ·,,113.01 rrFT l'O l!-lt... WI-_SlERLY LIW ()1::.;,:_,r. ·~t::--'l·-,iHI-./ l~ACIFIC RAl~Wti.,· CC1Mf-'A'H 0 :0 RIGHT (lF WI\Y: -. Ti-!ENU:. NOl?i"H 29·41,'54· EAST Al O'-/G <;A,[) ~IGIIT •li -WAY L.. '-if, 949 -53 tT[T rn AN IIWN l'll'l W'I IICI I f'Ol~JT IS THE , !)I.Jr p; , I' 0 1 13ECiNNl~JG OF l'--1~ _ t,!:. ~lESCRl8ED ii[RCll-i; TC-l[NCF l~ORl!-1 :,'.TZ·1'j5" ,';T-;;: '.i:.-!;.:JCJ ffl-_l ·O AN IRC~J f'rT; IC,Ft-JCE COl~TINUll·!C: l,CKIH '.J'?'/.<l.'J6" WEST 488.23 Tl.I. l,,1f)l~f-'1~ L[SS, TO \Hr l'J~Jr..R !-11\RGOR L lfJ[ or LM'.F WA'.-;...;1~J(; "ON, rxc(.Pf r,oRTlOl>J "HU~fm l)~Sc~·KrD A~ LULLUW~: [1[GlNNING ,, I HE -,v::: ""'OINl OF :ltGINNh'G or fHE LIN[ D[SU<IO[!J I iUi[IN· lH!-NC: -~IORTII 59'2,>'JR" WIST .'10 ffFT; THf·I~(> ·~O~lHE .. ~ST[RLI' TO A POINT ON SAID WEST[RLY LIi~[ or S.A.':) t-,;QHn·:[R\' PACIFir RAIi W/..Y COMl'ANYS f~IGI IT --CF-WA':' DIS !AN i NOi~ 11-1 29".!.4\i4" E,\ST 100 FE~T FROM SAID llWl f'OINT OF 8EGIN'>JING; THENC? S()lJIH ?CJ't.4'5,1" W[ST TO SAID TRlff i"OINI UI ULGiNr<INC A~,D l.:<CEP~ TIIA-PORTl!Jr~ Or-SA.ID SHORELANDS L'r1NG NGR .. HFRI.'/ CF THt: NORThFRi Y INL rn· St,:D LOl 5 f'ROOUCFC· WLSILILY: ALSC THAT f'ORTIO'J OF GOVER'HAENT LOT 4, S[CTION 29, TOWNSHIP ?.<1. r-..CRlr-~A.iK:!· :) 0 .!.Sl. W.M., I~, K1r-..·G COUNTY, WASHINGTON, TOGETl-1['1 W'!T:-1 SHORFL ANOS OF THE SFCOND CLASS rRONTING Tl l[RCO~ L Y:t,G WE.ST OF ·1 HE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAil. WAY RrGHl-Of-·· WA v AND SOU H Of-IH~ ~OU ow,w; JESCRl9:::D LI:-.;[; 8EGINNINC AT Ti-JE NORTlffAST CORNP CF SAIi) G0\1nHii,ffNI LOT 4, WHiCH POIW IS MARKED BY AN IRON PIPE AND iS 920 IEET, I.AORE OR LFSS, NOF;TH OF TI-IC: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT; lfilNCL SOUIH /\.LONG THE EAST LINE THEREOF, ·sa FE[l; • TH~NCE.,L/0.f.62 FEE~ TO THE. WESTERl.Y LINf OF SAID RICl-!T-OF-WA"f; -'li1[N[E soutH'/VESTERl Y AL.ONG SAID RICIIT or WAY LIN[ 156 l[[T ~c TII[ -~1W~~1~-~9~wf·~'j8~;.)~l1:i~-J~66° ri~T~ESCRIBfD: THENct N\JR~H 6T.!.G' .. WESi·.,2lC. FEET TO THE INNER HARBOR L!Nf OF Lt,K(:.·w~SHINGT~.~-.-~s NOW ES?.~ISH~-~. /I.ND THE TERMINUS OF THE LINE: ALSo:>lHA:f .. P .. Oth··oN OF GOJ.lF:Rff°MENT:=·""LoT 5,: :SECTION 29. TOWl\1SH1P 24 .;."·NlJff:fHi·:-RANGr 5 FAST,_.::vJ.M_·; . ...:N Kl~ COUNJ?, WASHl"!GrnN, AND . .A.lJJAf:!;:'.Nl SHORElANOS··"()F,.THE Sf:E:t]r;J_[J C.l,.~SS IN HWNJ lH!:.H!:.Gf LYlNG ~g~~;;lb o;S T~~~too:;'.:!~N P.A9r1c R.ki(WAY COMPAN'f'S RIGHT-OF-WAY, m·r~NN·t,.,(; A" .t.t"i; QlJAl(JI'~~ CORNl-.rl-···oN IHI sour1-1 llt~r or ~AID srL.Tl'.")N JO' .:tHENcE NDRi'H ag·sa'JG" WEST .A'LO'~G T.~E'SOun~ .. ,NE .. 6F"-.SA'D LDT =. 'A DIS1ANct.· OF 1.ni.c1 rEET.:f-6 11-1i::-·WESTERLY W,I:. Of S1'\iG:NORlHtkN -.· PACIFIC. P.AILWA y -GbMPANY'S: '-RIGfm-=Or -WAY; . . : ....... IHFNG···NORTH .. 7,9·,1-4'54" t-AST ~ONG SAID ~..J{:Hi-·0/.:-.-Wi\Y 11r~r ··g~_.o:j F'FT JJ.'"l° Ai'< 1ROr,i-. .-P:::>E -,V·\ICH POIN.T-'IS THF TR\JF PO'NT.-"CF ~~~~~Nt~b(g~J. 2?',14-'.6°4=.: W[~r ALONG .S{;o Rl:;f;T OF -~,;~\_:,j·~~ ~QC":;~· rcn -· . ·:. -·-·.· IIILt-.lCL NOR ill .'::i~i'24'j6" Wt5f. 1.059.16 ~H.•1·:··t,Wl-{l or~ U:.SS, [j' llll INNER l·/IRBOR LINE or LI\KE 'N"A.SlllNCTON; ,• .. ,.--.. THENCt. NOklH 44"2o'OU" i:.AS ·,_-1-QNG SP..ID IWJlr< H:AR8CH t-iNE iCJ2.9:'i:· fE.~1 :a A rOIN' FROM WIIICH T•i[ ·mU&.['OINT.--0!''.GECINNINC GEARS:.-: SOU":·1 59'24'J6" EAST; -.,.-,.-._:· . lllP~Cf-SOUlll '.:,9"24"J6" l./,Sl 1,,:1,.~.;i-~ /-ft 1, MCml.. Of(LFs~;. ro.:•i-lff TRUI:: POINT OF BEGINNING, . .. . [XCffT rorn10N TI·IEREOf DESCRIRf..D AS l"DLL:)WS: RFGINNlll)G AT TH[ TRUE POINT or BEGINNING OF THE .A.BOVE DESCRIBED P'<'.01-'r f~ IY: 11-1:>JGl SOl~TH 29'44'5.t" W[ST ALONG TIIE WEST[.~LY Ll~K or TII[ NO~TIIEPN --'ACIF""IC R..:O.ILWAY COl..lP~f.JfS RIGHT OF WAY 100.01 FEE Thf-NCt. NORIH ti9·24'.55" WE'ST lCl0.01 ·ll l; lllf NC\: NOh'IH ~6"28'50" EAST 111.16 ·TET 10 A PC'NT FROM Wrll2--l THE TRUE POINT or rl[CINNINC B[ARS SOUTH !:j')"24"36" [AST A Dl:lJMlfl_,Q/-,.'.",C, l·f-1-1; ."fl-fllJC[ sou·11\··~-g.-2.fJ6" EAST SJ FETT TO Tl-!E FL' ~QIIH c,i:- l3LGl~JtJ;i~G A~:[; [X(tP.T Tl IAT :-'ORTIQI~ JI ':;AID Si ,OR[LAt~IJS Ylt~C; ·~C~THFR!,Y OF HF ·~o.R-:-Hf-.RIY I.IM~ o• '.;All) cC,:)\/f;RN\.H:N· l()"" c;~'.Ol)lji_:::) W[~Tr-RL):-: :·: .-.-.· .. NJ-tJ EXffPT:"",lHA. '-'Uf<l!U~l CCNVF?Cn .[_() H.:cr I SOUND l'OWf.R A!'-11) l l(_:H 1 f:bMr'/,"l'( rl" "ric.P.J. Rt'(";oP.nrri"DFCfMrl.f. 0 R Vi, Hlf.4, lnJDrn i~[TORDINC tJO ·-·~H:.-·_i.~t,:C-.. ,_... . .. ·.·.:;11uA·ti··.1t{ 11'. .. :;ou:Jry:·;)~ .:1Nc;.:s1,~.li-01-wA"sHlr~,.-;·T·i_~~: AUDITOR OR RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE ~ i" ii'.;(} 0 '..J' 1 ·,·C(Ji C '.l'1i 0 ,:le; i of 1 '~ Tl Lhmk o/ :,\}I ·.-~'y", •Jt '..<l•:J(' nt :··1: ::iu :, 1 -we & ;-! :c-,1t-1r::-:. r-,c cc,Jl l"Y f1\ PITOR rm JIV ':,I(:~ ()"' h'~:: '·i:;:[."'"'., ~· .SEE l"Af>E l.::,._.'ll)" A,1~11;1r r,· S;11penn:f!nt!H1 ., ·,-c. (!'. --,JT ·~ ! (_"/,JC, ·,ecc·ds · 1° r1q_1 v:;rrei:tly r;:opr·c)ser:; ~~ s, '·iP'f ·nc:c!f' -y ··-,:c, :~· 't:r'r ·ny ,·1,r · ·1n.1 n ,-,-,,·1ft,c-n::-(r, .-,j[· tr!'.' 1e'•J1•r:,mw·1,. ~ the BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC, CIVll FNC'~\lffRS & i ANO St;:'::1/FYORS \1-c, "-(~-.....! '.~u, '<SY --?ccrirdir1~! 1\c. :1: •-l""i..1 ),.1,,..._, re,:,_w:.;l 0' q4 2009 MINO.~ AVE. E"AST (206) 323 4144 S[ATTl.r, WASHINGTON 1---800-·935· 0508 9e10;,-3513 r Ax# uor,) . .;,;,._:, 11.1;; t.-.--ri,:..11_ 1r-.i,Qffi;:lkl-lN•:.~:ur.i. J -) '-..... I I/ l ,_1...•_·, ,, C\o· !.if:vil•c r·Js, "2'-::,.,,1, 20C<:)02099 Occcs ",):.,I..: 1,' r,p:;:r, 1/?7/ oLJ .'. ;::cc:,c,,.·.'l.;;.c·,.:-.c·.,;.;., R[CDF?D o( 'URV['( ... JA{},-DEVELOPMENT RUHON, .. ,,,_-.. -· Kl'..JG ;·our,ny .. DRAWN ~-:" DA.E: oA.tt~ .. : .. 1.~08-9'? ,!CJ8 13,5 17G, B W:"·.-_.f: :·.1.~ J:__1· 96145.9{) CliCC<[D GY SA1-i ':,CAl [· 1" 200; ···tSiLl~C': ,) ,J,-: 3 20080902001178.:: Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1111111111111111 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 20080902001178 CITY OF RENTON EAS 48.00 PRG£00\ OF 007 01/02/2008 12:43 KING COUNTY, UR SANITARY SEWER UTILITY EASEMENT Pro="". Tax Paro::el Number: 29240S"1002 Project File#: LUA-02--040 Street Inteisection or Project Name:Baxter Lift Station !Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numberS are on page __ . Grantor(s): Grantee(s): I. Quendall Terminals l. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation The Grantor(s), as named above, for and in consideration of mutual benefits, do by these p,escnts. grant. bargain, sell. convey, and warrant unto the above named Grantee. its successors and assigns. a non-exclusive ea'oement for public sanitary ~.ewer with necessary appurtenances over. under, through, across and upon the following de!.eribed property (!he righl-of- way) in King County, Washington, more particularly described in E,;hibit A: For the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, installing, repairing, replacing, enlarging, operating and 1naintaining sanitary sewer utilities and utility pipelines. together with the right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal obligatipn or iiabil ity therefor. Following the initial construction of its facilities, Grantee may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require. All facilities shall be underground. This easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions: I. lhe Grantee shall, upon completion of any work within the property covered by the easement. restore the surface of the casement, and any private improvements disturbed or destroyed during execution of the work. as nea.fly as practicable to the condition they were ln immediately before commencement of the work or entry by the Grantee. Grantee shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Grantor. its successor~ and assigns. from any damage. liability. claim. lien, or loss, including attorney's fees and costs, arising out of use of the easement by Gran1ee. its agents. •.:ontr"?.-::tors. 'iouccesson: in title, a-;signs. authorized persons, and/or all others acting on its behalf. except to the extent such damage, liability, claim, lien, or loss, is due to the negligence or intentional misconduct of the Grantor or an agent,. c~ntt'a.Ctor,-successor in title, authoriz.ed person, assign ·ofGrantor. 2. All construction and installation of improvements within the easement and the operation and maintenance thereof shall be performed (a) in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and pennits, (b) in a lien.free. professional and safe manner. and (c) with due diligence at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner to minimize interference with other use.son the property. Prior to entry onto the casement for repajr or maintenance, Grantee shall provide teasonahle notice to Grantor, except to the extent of an emergency. 3. Grantor shall tetain the right to use the surface of the easement, and to grant utility easements to other utility providers. as long as such use or additional easements do not interfere with the easement rights grarued to 1he Gran1ee. Gramee will cooperate with Grantor for the location of additional utilities within the easement area. Gtantor shall not, however, have the right to: a. Erect or maintain any buildings or structures within the easemcnl; or b. Pla11t trees, shrubs or vegetation having deep root patterns which may cause damage to or inrerfere with the utilities to be placed within the easement by the Grantee; or C. Develop, landscape. or beautify the easement area in any way which would unteasonably increase the costs to the Grantee of restorinv the easement area and anv orivatc imorovcmcnts therein. STATE OF W ASHL'!GTON COUNTY OF KING ) ) ss. ) 20080902001178.:: On this J..8.:= day of ~. 2008, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the ~ ~ state of Washington, duly commissione and sworn, personally appeared DENIS LAW to me known to be the Mayor of the CITY OF RENTON, that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said City, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. and on oath stated tliat s/he is authorized to execute the said instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto s my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. i·~~/~?-,~-,:"2::. C DWT2236882vl 0032695-000004 Page4 FORM OJ 0008/bb/ F.XTfllll'r "A- SAN1TARY SEWER HASEME::-rr LEGAL DESCRlPT[ON Tiu, po,:t,QJ1 ,;,fC,,ve<"On1cnr. L<>r 5 iu :0-.,oio>,\ 29, T<1wn,hip ::>,4 N,,nh. R:a'1~ ~ N•T, W.M. and shottland~ ..<!joining lyin,it wc,otnly of the Not"(hcro p,.cm.c R~irro.,.J Roflht ofW1y u,.d 1t0u:hcrly of :11. \inc d~<:ribcd :u followt: Beg,tl!\lllK ,u the Quar«r Comee un U,c ,ou,h line ..:,( nid Sccrion :Z',1; th"-°""' N"'th ~9G5a•_)G'' We,1 ll]ongthc Sourh lincc .,(,1if W;y; tb.cac.c-;",lorth ~9•44•.,4•• ..:~.,, B-4-9.62 "''" ~wni=, .... d Right 0CW1y Linc co,. p<>Ont hc:rcin..&t r<:fcucd co ,... Poin~ A; u,,,nc:c. ~,;,ntinwng North 2;9•44',4" &l~t. 200.01 fc,,:c to Ulc·l'RUE POJNJ.' OF BEGIN.t..:L'IC of the:: lim, hcm:in d<e~_bcd,, thc .. cc Somh S6"2S'50,. Wen, 222.32 lcet u, apoinr..-lu<:h beat.a NC!E!l,. 599 l4'S6'' Wwr. 100.01 fu.s1 l<"Om. ..aid ~c A; lhe<1otc.North" sm,·s,c;~ Wen: n;, <ho. T:rineic"fbih"Oc Lu:;, =.d ~he en\;1-,;,l'.,._ld llilCI a.,_.enptio,,:i: · ·-· Also th.et pOttlo.u: of sa.id Covccru"('l,cmt Lot 5 l)'Wg s,::,urhcuicdy of Luc Was'.:tingron Boukvud. we,!edy o( $~conduy St:arc I ligh"""l7 Nwnbc:r 2..\ ""d ootthwu1ccly of ihc R.agh! <>f W:.y of \"uLli<.: SL.re High...,,o;y N...uilicc l :cs <:""><ai)bMd by deed n:coTdcd undo::r ~\.,tlit.or'• !"lie No :;68"/408, contllini.ag 'l1.7 :.ere, m<>r,;. Orlen (:.<.C\.l.Dcy ?Q one "c=) uf"wl,,rh '.] 8, c:,,::r,,:~ ,uc ulkic=w.Rt.<,~ ,hn....,l:,nd, C<:>mm.,:,iorig ..,, the rn<>n nunhc-:,~tczly comu of u,,, :o.buvc-,!c,u;ribt;.! p"'->pcny; :hco-::~ ~ocg the wc,1edy nu.tgi.n u{ h.id R.uln,id t:18,ht•Of•IIAY Sou<h 29°44'54'" w.,._._ 1 02. l l feet t<> the TRU.1=. POINT OF BSClNNING; tb=ce lem-i4t s2id cigb.t·of·way ,,,up Nonh (i0~1 S'U6" We,~. 42.00 t'.:>et: tb""1cc South 2?•44'S4" West,. S.'>,00: thence :,;;0<>,,h 6U"l S"06"" En,, 42.0fl fee1 I.O :<iud rW,t•of·w~y t11atgin; tbmcc lllot1.'!: •o.id right.of·W'ily m,uKU' ::--ronh :Z9°"4<l'S4" F.""· SS.00 (~ \<), the TRUE PO TNT OF BF.GINN LNG. a-.,s;, of lk:,,ring-Deed tL'CO::ded ur,dt:r Aud.i101 Pile No.1so·1160.SlG, Roo::o.....J~ <if 'King Councy, w.~hu1A1<>u. DWT 2236882,l 0032695-000004 Page5 .!UUtlUl:IU.!UUl 1 I K · FORM OJ 0008/bh/ -------------· UNE TASLE LINE 8EAAIHG LI S 29·44'54~ W L2 ' ·1s·os· w u s ?9'44''>4M w L4 S 60"1 "-'06" £ l5 N .44•54• E: I I _j -~ OlSTANCE 102.11 42.00 55.00 42.0:) ~5.00 I I I ; ; I I I I I , .. · -/_ Iii, .1 / SOUTH UNF. GOVi LOl" 5. Sf'C.7.9. '1'.24M .. R.5E.., W.M. I I / I ;' I I " ""' Ncvemoer 26, 2001 Quendall Terminals 6....,..1 WCL ~ ~ RC:::-.:TON, WASl-l!NG:"CN -... RL'S .3G788 Pni,o;t s·1as·n6? DWT 2236882, I 00326'l5-000004 Page6 ' ' 2008090200117R · ·· ·· FORM 03 0008/bh/ • 2008090200117R .... CAllFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT fi("~~--Q~.fK'@.&?~-OS~:¥$¢,,.g-i'f"Z¢~~lf-~§'"~...:;f' .. p('..d(".,c<',(,"<',¢f,C('d>,'t,(-:<-',c{.,S.."< State of California County of SVl~---'-"YYµ'-""--1--&~~--._} On /-~/-t?~ before me, Dato personally appeared _Georgi"'-~=9::.u,i,,..;\u.-,,=.,,_~=~=·~----------:5 Name(s) of Signe1(s) ----. ------ r:··-·····-··· • LORI J. STUMPF ~ Commlsston # 1.536054 J I Nota,y Public -Como,rila f J ~ Son Meleo (' e,,,n!y. ( J.. M';'Cornm. &pies Dec 24 2008 0 d S $ C $ C C O C O P!a~e Notary Soal Above who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person~ whose name~) is/• subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged.-to. me that 1,1/she/• executed the same in ~/her/1-' authori2ed capacity~. and that by-llli!;/her/ll!eir signature~) on the instrument the personei,), or the entity upon behalf of which the person\s) acted. executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. Though the information below is not required by Jaw, it may prove vafuabte the documen and could prevent fraudulent removal and reaftachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type ol Document: So,_n 1 \c. v) Document Date:_ /-3 I -,.;£" . . ~w~ Ll.J.<.Ji·-j &,";c£.""'Q "'-t: Number of Pages:~- Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: ___ _ Capacity(ies) Claimeil'by Slgner(s) Signer's Name: GwfiiA. ~ tl::1--e D Individual IJ ?r-clo" r t;l'--Corporate Officer -Title(s): C. §:> D Partner -D Limited L ·1 General lJ Attorney in Fact D Trustee 0 Guardian or Conservator 0 Other: __________ :< .Itfni.~ti@!:rn;i::, ----------.·;, '·::.;i·.tf*zi"-:••.,f Signer ls Representing: _____ :} ~,~,f:\/f,»:ftf~;l;ff ,,. ·_•: t1t;.Jr.'·:!i·~l!'..:\:r·, ,U-i -----------. \j;'\,}tHJW::1:k:,(C ···'.,'.t~f-~)i> Signer's Name: __ ... D Individual D Corporate Officer -Title(s): ________ _ D Partner -D Limited D General D Attorney in Fact OTruslee D Guardian or Conservator 0 Other:. Signer Is Representing:_ ·----··----- ~--'is?.S-/lJ&k c{:i<·ri'~-"'@'1'1*:l:li CkQ4 J~3QfoJ:i.:U•3~ik8;&:.™--.~-W~ @2001 National Nolaiy AssociallOfl • 9350 De SOio Ava., P.O.Bax 2402 •Chat:.worth, CA 91313-2402 .. WWW.NaliOr\SINctary.org Hem 15907 Rl.'Oldef: Ga!ITO't-free 1-800-87&6827 \ :• \: i / / / .-- ! / - ., ;..., "''~ .. , i' r ,"'_! ' -... H:~.~·. . ., ..... ,,, .. . ! ... ; /:'--· if ! ! ; ·, : I • . ~ J/ : ; ~' /, ,, ., • ' -, ---· • : / / a a / / , / , ! Ii Ji _.-- , / () '• /.....,_-!,.·' ,. '·, .. , .. •• I .'1/ /II I I I _J t~K;n!;iC°"",1y 0· ... ,.,;.<:,t•S-1'"':>Ns ·,1 ·1 , ........ -· ·- ·--· ·-· , ___ >_LI_L_----------- ----~·:::-.::--... -~--·::. ·'.:=.:; ..... ..=.':. i~-~ r:::_!~ i =_i -I ••.• II ------------- , / , 8 .' .. / ' / ..... .. ' i l I I _?tff/ J~ ,.i / > / "·t/: /,/' / ' ,· I/// _-•/: J /_,,., ~ 'J // /} . i i / \ .. '\ ' ' SW 29-24-05 " ,! " ,'! :,· ,.: ' '': . . . 'i. / 1.\ . . '; ! ' \ .... , ) ! .\ !! !i 'I l I.· I ,, : /i r--. ---'' -~c~n; /. I f : __ ___ _/_ -J J / \ I \ I d I H I ' _, -,;;; -+ ·""'' ,....,. ... ! .. -~ ,. 'li1f run11.1 ' ,.,.. "' - ... ,. "'.loll ....... "" co "' " -. '. ''"·" --.,>-~ ---.-,:;..,,: • HILLMAN'S GARDEN OF ,, .. ·,., ....... - LAKE EDEN ' .,, . " ""'" ,a-"!1'1~~-;: I " L .. .,,, .:.r.ro __ ...... -"' " ' .,, .... "" ...,, ,·.u,o ,, Jltl !MA-OS-~~~~-, " ---i --I ·--I! __ \ \ ' ' -. ,,,,c:,-. !.O:. \ '·"" ,.:., ... - .,,,,,, ""' J (,t~--- I l·--r-7/---~-~--~1~~~1~·~~~~~-~-~ .. ~- / i, - > 5 ,l ' ' J , I I / .. : .. . • ·'"' • ., .. "' ......... ,,, ,,,,, ~ ...... ,.,·, ' ! , :' ! l :. ., i ! ! .I! ii· ' I li! • •' ,, ! I I', l g ' '1: ·' , ....... .!. . , .. .JIV. .. 1 ,· r ' ' ' ~ -- • • ·I···""'·· !.' . i-: ~; ;·· ·a·· ~ i ·:· ~ f j "t :•t /. . \ \·. ,s,\ \. ', ..f·. . ti ' l-" '"-1"' ~-1· -: ---.. -i-; r r11' ',.. / t·/ 1-I -1/··• . ( /1 i : \ /( "1 j i \ \, ,' l 1···1;1 \f---...J \ rr_• , >\ I,' l':--=---1t 1 1\,i• I . \11 .... .:. ·\··ti-_..___,.,_-_j -~ ':~ ... ... ; ... · .. 'i:-;~ \ ..,\,. . 59 l· ,I ,i i §g :i: "l I i. I ~ I i ! -3" ' ' I ' j • , ! • ' I ,', 'I t ' / ~·- t±ri ·, NW 32-24-05 ----~---- ' i I I j i :: : 'I/ .... ,._ ··.i..r ,-,- "/ ._., ·. A '1 C '(, ~ ~\_~(!~ W+E s Detail "A" First American Title Company Tax ID: 292405-9002-03 Short Legal:A Portion of County of King Reference No.: 380710 County: King Map Not To Scale Plotted Easements Legend LJPIQ D 03120,1953 # 5562896 (Powerlines) -·-·· 11/20/1964 # 5814320 (10' Wide -Utility) 11/20/1964 # 5814320 ( Utility) 07/1980 # 8007070459 (Public Utilities) D 02,1511996 # 9602150689 (Roadway & Utilities) Face of Survey Bk135 Pg176 (Undisclosed Purpose -Not Plottable ~ 09/02/2008 # 20080902001178 (Sanitary Sewer) This map may or may not be a survey of the land depicted hereon. You should not rely upon It for any purpose olher than orientation to the general location of the parcel or parcels depicted. First American Title expressly disclaims any liability for alleged loss or damage which may result from reliance upon this map. ' Project Name: Quendall Terminals Date of Hearing April 19, 2016 REFERENCE COPY Staff Contact Vanessa Dolbee Current Planning Manager CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER, EXHIBITS Project Number: LUA09-151 ECF, EIS, SA-M, SM Project Contact/Applicant Campbell Mathewson, Century Pacific, L. P ., 1201 Third Ave, suite 1680, Seattle, WA 98101 Project Location SW J4 Section 29, Township 24 N, Range 5 E. Parcel 2924059002. South of the Sea hawks Training Facility The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit 1: Exhibit 2: Exhibit 3: Exhibit 4: Exhibit 5: Exhibit 6 Exhibit 7: Exhibit 8: Exhibit 9: Exhibit 10: Exhibit 11: Exhibit 12 Exhibit 13 Exhibit 14 Exhibit 15: Exhibit 16: Exhibit 17: Exhibit 18: Staff report to the Hearing Examiner, which can be found at the following link: http://rentonwa.gov/business/defau1t.aspx?id=32800 Environmental Review Documents -Draft EIS, Addendum to the Draft EIS, FEIS and Mitigation Document, which can be found at the following link: http://rentonwa.gov/business/default.aspx?id=32800 Environmental Review Committee Signature Sheets Neighborhood Detail Map Binding Site Plan Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Dismissing Appeal and e-mail chains following request. Site Plan (black and white and color) Parking Plan (black and white and color) Area Outline of Spaces Elevations Conceptual Landscape Plan Conceptual Storm Drainage and Grading Plan Roadway Sections Conceptual Utility Plan EA Letter addressing EPAand public involvement in the process Advisory Notes/Plan Review Comments Concurrence Memo Additional Lanes Required ------,,,,_,,,...Ren tO Il ' DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -----------~en ton® NOTICE OF ISSUANCE AND AVAILABILITY FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT {FEIS) AND MITIGATION DOCUMENT Notice is hearby given under WAC 197-11-510 and RMC 4-9-070 that the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and Mitigation Document for the proposal described below was issued by the City of Renton Environmental Review Committee on Monday, August 31, 2015, and is available for public review. Copies are available for review at the Renton Main Library, located at 100 Mill Avenue South, and the Renton Highlands Branch Library, located at 2902 NE 12th Street, and at Renton City Hall, Customer Service Counter, 6th floor, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton WA 98057, and on the City of Renton web site: (www.rentonwa.gov). APPLICATION NUMBER(S): PROJECT PROPONENT: PROJECT NAME: LUA09-151, EIS, ECF, BSP, SA-M, SM Campbell Mathewson Century Pacific, L. P. 1201 Third Ave, Suite 1680 Seattle, WA 98101 Quendall Terminals DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The proposal is located adjacent to Lake Washington on 21.46 acres of Commercial/Office/Residential (COR) zoned property. The EIS evaluates potential impacts resulting from a mixed-use development project, including four Alternatives, of which considers no action. The Preferred Alternative would contain 21,600 square feet of retail space, 9,000 square feet of restaurant and 692 residential units. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: 4350 Lake Washington Blvd City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 DOCUMENT PURCHASE INFORMATION: The Final Environmental Impact Statement is available for purchase from the Finance Department on the 1 '' Floor of Renton City Hall for $35 per hard copy or $10.00 per CD, plus tax and postage (if mailed). PUBLIC REVIEW: The impacts described in the Quendall Terminals DEIS and EIS Addendum are the basis for the mitigation measures established in the Mitigation Document. The Mitigation Document is designated by the City of Renton as the first decision document for the proposal. EXHIBIT 3 me IS'SUANCE & AVALABIL:TY I Fl\lAL ENVIRONMENTAL iMP;-\CT STATEMENT AND MffiGATlON DOCUMENT PAGE 2 of 2 APPEAL INFORMATION: Upon issuance of the FEIS and Mitigation Document, a twenty (20) day appeal period commences. Pursuant to WAC 197-11-680 and RMC 4-8-110.E., the adequacy of the Final EIS and the Mitigation Document may be appealed. Appeals must: 1) state specific objections of fact and/or law; 2) be submitted in writing by 5:00 p.m. September 24, 2015; and 3) be accompanied by a filing fee of $250.00. Appeals must be addressed to Phil Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, Renton City Hall, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: If you would like additional information, please contact Vanessa Dolbee, City of Renton at (425)430-7314 or vdolbee@rentonwa.gov. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: Gregg Zi PublicW September 4, 2015 August 31, 2015 r;,; l-z.1 J 15,:;;; ~--,,. ~ Mark Peterson, Administrator Fire & Emergency Services Date C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator Department of Community & Economic Development Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ji,, City off ----------i U_ "ri\<n)< /7'· ,~-v-J\ -c:.0 (£;li1.1.0©lfli NOTICE OF ISSUANCE AND AVAILABILITY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ADDENDUM {EIS ADDENDUM) Notice is hearby given under WAC 197-11-510 and RMC 4-9-070 that the Environmental Impact Statement Addendum (EIS Addendum) for the proposal described below was issued by the City of Renton Environmental Review Committee on Monday, October 15, 2012, and is available for public review and comment. Copies are available for review at the Renton Main Library, located at 100 Mill Avenue South, and the Renton Highlands Branch Library, located at 2902 NE 12th Street, and at Renton City Hall, Customer Service Counter, 6th floor, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton WA 98057, and on the City of Renton web site: (www.rentonwa.gov). APPLICATION NUMBER(S): PROJECT PROPONENT: PROJECT NAME: LUA09-151, EIS, ECF, BSP, SA-M, SM Campbell Mathewson Century Pacific, L. P. 1201 Third Ave, Suite 1680 Seattle, WA 98101 Quendall Terminals DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The proposal is located adjacent to Lake Washington on 21.46 acres of Commercial/Office/Residential (COR) zoned property. The EIS Addendum to the Draft Enviornmental Impact Satment (DEIS) issued December 10, 2010; evaluates potential impacts resulting from a new Preferred '?,ltemative. Similar to Alternatives 1 and 2 in the DEIS, the Preferred Alternative is intended to be a mixed-use development. The Preferred Alternative would contain 21,600 square feet of retail space, 9,000 square feet of restaurant and 692 residential units. For those assumptions that have been modified under the Preferred Alternative, the updated analysis is included in the provided EIS Addendum. These elements include, Critical Areas, Aesthetics/View, Parks and Recreation, Transportation, Cultural Resources and Relationship to Plans and Policies. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: 4350 Lake Washington Blvd City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1055 S Grady Way Renton,WA 98057 DOCUMENT PURCHASE INFORMATION: The Draft Environmental Impact Statement is available for purchase from the Finance Department on the 1'' Floor of Renton City Hall for $25 per hard copy or $10.00 per CD, plus >,ax and postage (if mailed). UK ISSUANCE & /;\/,.'.!..'...ABIUTY/ LNV!?.ONMENTAL 1MPACi ST/1,TEME~T ADDENDUM PAGE 2 of 2 PUBLIC REVIEW: Written public comment on the DEIS will be accepted for a 30-day review period ending at ;OO p.m. Monday, November 19, 2012. Written Comments should be addressed to: Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner, Planning Division, 6th floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: If you would like additional information, please contact Vanessa Dolbee, City of Renton at (425)430-7314 PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: ~-~~:-~r~--- Public Works Department tzt~/ina:~~--,---~ Terry Higashiyama, Administrato Community Services Departm October 19, 2012 October 15, 2012 I () / rn / /(, lz ___ <.;_}l 717 "'--.._ /_-__ -_____ -_' \ -/ /r1 Is-:/ ~~ MarkPete7s'on, Adfuinistrator -Da~/,/ ;_c:.__ Fire & Emergency Services !~ ffi-J,.-s:/1.;;z C £ \} "--=c~-~ ;~-- oa~ C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator Department of Community & Economic Development k2I;s/ 202 Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNll Y AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NOTICE OF ISSUANCE AND AVAILABILITY DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (DEIS) Notice is hearby given that the City of Renton has issued the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for Quendall Terminals mixed use development on December 10, 2010 pursuant to WAC 197-11- 510 and RMC 4-9-070, and is available for public review. Copies are available for review at the Renton Main Library,the Renton Highlands Branch Library, and Renton City Hall, Customer Service Counter, 61 " floor, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton WA 98055, and on the City of Renton website (www.rentonwa.gov). APPLICATION NUMBER(S): PROJECT PROPONENT: PROJECT NAME: LUA09-151, EIS, ECF, BSP, SA-M, SM Campbell Mathewson Century Pacific, L. P. 1201 Third Ave, Suite 1680 Seattle, WA 98101 Quendall Terminals DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Quendall Terminals mix use development DEIS considers potential development concepts for the redevelopment of a 21.46 acre Superfund site located along the shoreline of Lake Washington. The DEIS evaluates potential impacts resulting from the proposed development. The following are alternatives evaluated within the DEIS: Alternative 1, which consists of 800 residential units, 245,000 square feet of office, 21,600 square feet of retail and 9,000 square feet of restaurant; Alternative 2, which consist of a less dense alternative where the office component is eliminated and residential units are reduced to 708 units; and Alternative 3, a no action alternative. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: 4350 Lake Washington Blvd City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 DOCUMENT PURCHASE INFORMATION: The Draft Environmental Impact Statement is available for purchase from the Finance Department on the 1" Floor of Renton City Hall for $25 per hard copy or $10.00 per CD, plus tax and postage (if mailed). PUBLIC REVIEW: Written public comment on the DEIS will be accepted for a 30-day review period ending at :00 p.m. rv1ondav Januarv 10 ?011. Written Comments should be addressed to: Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner, Planning Division, 6'" floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. A public hearing will be held on Tuesday, January 4. 2011, at 6:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, i' floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: If you would like additional information, please contact Vanessa Dolbee, City of Renton at (425)430-7314 PUBLICATION DATE: December 10, 2010 DATE OF DECISION: December 6, 2010 SIGNATURES: Gregg Zi . rma,n, A ministrator Date Mark Peterson, Administrator Public Wor s Department Fire & Emergency Services ~-j_,_ ;._ 1Z.l1o /11) Jerry Higashiyama, Administrator Date /ommunity Services Department .l () /· ~:Ll Alex Pietsch, Administrator Department of Community & Economic Development iv(~{~~ Date LAKE WASHINGTON N + (CJ Z,Wloim'(<:o-w"r jPROJECT SITE! 20.3AC re, __ ,._ --\RIPLEY LN N\ [1-405\ [1-405[ e !BARBEE MILL ENTRANCE~ ,._ ---1N 43RD ST\ jN 42ND PL[ .¢~ .-""~LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N\ .~r ff .p J' ~ GRAPHIC SCALE: ,..., 0 00ft EXHIBIT 4 NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP QUENDALL TERMINALS DE9Cl!ll'TION: ™H POIITICN Cl' ~ LOT !I IN SEC11CN 211, TOYIN9ff> 2' ~ RANGE !!, EAST, W,t,l,, AltD SH!HL.IH) IDJOIHll,KI L '1'11«. WE'Sm!t. Y OF 1N[ IQITHERII PAaFlC RM.ROM) RIGHT-Df-WAY N//0 50.J'IHERLY Df A LINE, IN KINO COUNTY. WASHNGTilN, DCSCRJBro 4S FCUOWS: BE!la'MNC AT 111E QIJ~ lXHIER ON 11£ 90IJffl LI£ Df SAil SECTION 28; n£NCE NOR™ 88 '59'36" IIIE:ST A1.cttG M !ICIJlH UfE Cl' Sl'.IO LOT 15. 1.11:,.0, F'E:ET lD lHE ¥1CSTERlY UN£ Df SAil ltORWIERN PACFIC l!/&.l.RtJAll RKlHT-Of-WAY: n£NCE NORnl 29'44'!>4" EAST 849.'2 FE£T 1,l,llNC SAlll 1111:HT-Of-WAY U!IE TD A PONT IIEROIAFlER RfHJRD TD AS POINT 11; ltDICE CONTNJING Nc»ITH 211 "+4'54" EAST 200.Dl f'EET TD lHE TRUE POINT OF IIEGINMMC Of lHE LINE HERDN DESt:tll8EI>; ll1DICE SOIJlll M '2,t~ WEST ZZ2.32 Fm TD " PONT 'MICH EIEAAS -™ ~ "2~'56-VIEST 100.0I ft£T FROM SM> l'(WfT A, lHENCE I-IO!t™ !ID '24'56" 'IIEST TD lHE l<ffER HAR&OR 1.11E ANO lHE OID Cl' SAKI UHE C£SC1111'110N; ....SO ™il>T POIITIOII Cl' SAE! ~ LOT !I L'flltG SOU1HEAS1[RLY Cl' LNCE W~TOH IIOUl.£\IAAll, IIIE:Sl[J!Ly Cl' SECONDNO" STA'IC IIIH«AY NOWIIER 211 AND Nami'IIESTERLY Of 11,£ -T-Of-W/1.Y Cl' f'UIUC STA'IC HDfWIIY NOMIIER 1 /1.S ESTAB..IS1£D BY oaD ~ JlriNI.IARY 1S, 1"84 IJKJER IIEIXl!CMHC NO, 15887«18; /I.IIO EllCEPT TH.O.l l'CIRTION T\OEOf ~ TO a,y Of R[l(TOH, II ILINla!"AI. CORPORATION HY DEED RECOR[)(!) .IJNE 111, 2008 \.INDER RECall)ING ND. 2CI09:l819001179. TI'lt.E REPORT REFERENCE, THIS SJR\£f WAS CCHllJC1EO l'.C!XlRDINC TO 1NE DESC1111'1Klll SHOflN. FUINSKD BY FRST AMERICAN TlTI.[ IHSJRAltCE CCM'NIY, COl,ll,llUENT ND. NCS-3II0710-WA1. 11-IRO REP!RT, DA1ED DECEMBER 14, 200D. T1iE EASEMENTS !H>WN CR ttOlEO HEREON lln,l,TE TD 11-IS COt,ll,lrnlfNT. ~: E/1.SDIOITS a!U.1ED CR RESCMICO ,no THIS D ... 1E M. MDT SHll'IIN OR NOlED HEREON. mu: REPORT SOf[OlU B CXCEPT10NS: l"TEJ,IS ClRCUD ARE SHOWN ON 11111'. ~-Rf.UID!J!!:HIE) Of ""-l ODS11NG M«) f\J1U!E IIUITS TO UGffT. VO, Nl/0 /1.111, lOGCTHEJI 'Ill™ 111E RIOIITS Of ACCESS TO lrM) FRCM lHE STATE HIGHWAY CONS1RUCTED ON LANDS CDNW:YED HY DOCUMDfT IN F/1.\Cfl. Cl' ltlE STATE Of W/&.5HNGlCIN: IIECOROED: OCTOBER 1t, 11151 RECORDING NO.: 4178247 G U.sae,fl, lMCl.UDING lDMS AND PINMSIONS COfTA..im THVtON, R[(X)RD!tlG INFORIIA TlOH: l,IAAQl :ZO. IM3 UNDfR RECORDING NO. 5!ifl:28N IN F"YOR CF: PUGET SIJlH> PDIIIER 1MJ LJQ,IT ca.lPNU, A CORPORAllOH, ITS stJCC£SSa'lS N//0 "8SIGNS FOIi: POWER LINE MF[CTS, lHE ttOR1H'/IEl,IEIY PORTia-1 OF lHE PROPElllY l£REIN DESCRl9ED WESTERLY Cl' Rllll.RO/I.O RIGHT-Df-W"Y @) E/1.StJriENT, INCl.Uo,«. l\'.RUS Nl/0 PR0\4SICINS CONTMIED 1HEREN RECORCIING INf"CRIIMk>I: NO\DIBER 20, 111154 UNDER RECORlllNQ NO. !IG14320 IN FA\iDII OF: IIUHICl'NJTY Cl' IIETROPCUTAN SE/1.TTI.E. tTS """""" -~ fOR: UlUlY EASD,IENT Af'RCTS: TI£ NCRTHEAS1IRI.Y P(MTION Ill' TI£ l'ROPERlY 1ERE1H tJESCRIB(I) WESTERLY CF" R~l.ROAD RIGHT--<F-WAY 7. o:MNANT&. C(N)l"llONS. R£S1RICOOHS AND/CR EASUIENTS: RECORDED-.lllY 18. 19~ RECOR01NG HD.: 75071to!l3e @ E,l,SOEIT, INCUJCHNG TERVS AND PRlMSIONS COHT,\IIED "IMEll(Jtf: IICODRDING INF'ORl,IATION: ..IJI.Y 7, 111110 UN0£R RECORIIN8 NO. II0070704&9 IN FAI/Olt Of: QTY Of REN10lt. II t,IINCFN.. ca!PORATION All!: PUBUC IJT1UT1[S (lll<1.UJING W,,"IEft Nl/0 SFIEI) Aff"EC15: PCl!TlON Ill' lHE PR(J'[lflY HEREN DESCRIBE) "IIE51[RLY NIO .IOJACOIT "IO RAILROAD IIIOHT-CF"-WAY II. 9.!8,1:.CT 10 1HE lDll,IS Df THE JJNl 'r£N1I.A: ~ IIENEEI P\.lllET 1U:l'l'! CCIIIPANY AND Ill.TINO PRDPER1£S NC., D/1.TEO .JJNE 1S, 1871, ~T T11ER£TO D ... lEO SU'TEIIIE'I IZ, 18e0. 801H --UN0ER RE~ NO. 8102100531. l!EIXl!DlD FEBRIJAAY 19, 1981. MX:ORDINC "IO RE~TN.. CIN [>.!DENT UN0£R REcorolNG NO. 'lle021508IB. REOOllllED FEBRUARY 1S, ltllM; J.H. BAXTER .I: CO., CH.lflJRN/1. I.MlED PAR'llf£RSMJ' 11PPE,1,115 TD N,l\£ SUCC£[OOI PUGU TllllllUI CCM'ANI', A JONT '<9l11JRER. JU AllumwDfl'S: TO SAD .u,IT "911VRE AGRllMENT WST 11[ 5UBIIITTED f>RIOR ro a..o511NG ro ~ 1HE ClJRl!DIT SIGNATORIES. (§_) EASEMENT. INa..lJDNQ l\'.RUS Nl/0 PRO\filONS CONTA..im 'IHEREN RECCfllllNG N'CRll,.TICIN: ffBRUARY 1'-1-UNDER RE~ NO. IMOZl!!OtM 1H fA\iDII OF: 8AR9EE llll CO., INC., II W"911HG"ION t:Cl!f'(ltl,"IIIJN, AND J.H. 8/1.XTUo: .t CO., II C~,l lMTED ·-!'OIi: ROl'.D'II.O.Y AND UllJ"llES f.ff"ECT'S: ltlE EAST 90 FEET ~T 10 IIEST 1,1~ Of IVJUHIAD RICHT-Ol'-W/1.Y 11. 1HE TERMS AltD PIIOWi!CffS CONT/I.INED IN T1iE DOCUMENT ENTTlUD '\.AN) CCR£lil REC!MI" RECOAOED MAY 29, 1H7 "5 RECORDING HD. U05:Z!IOllJ(I Ill' Of00/1.L RECORDS. 12.~~~~~.3r:~=~N:. ~ REC01mU1 IN V0UJME 135 OF SURVEYS, AT PACE(S) 17t., IN KING ca!NlY. WASHINGTON. AUDITOR OR RECORDER'S CERl1FlCATE Filed for record \his __ doy of ___ . 20_ot __ " In Book __ of Surveys ot page ___ ot lhe request of BUSH, ROED &: HITCHINGS. INC. COUNTY AUDITOR OR DIVISION OF RECORDS & ELECTIONS County Auditor or Supedntendent of Records SW 1/4 S[CTION 29, T24N, R-5E, W.M. @EASEIIEffT, 9'CWlllNC 1ERWS 1MJ ~ IXNTMIED THEREJtl: ~ REC(R]NG N'tRIU.TlON: SEPlDll:l[R 2, 2DOB tJN0ER RECORC91G tiF/1.\Cfl.Of": HD. 200ll:lll02001178 arr Of RDITOH, A WJMiCP/1.l COIIPOltllllCM, ITS SUCC[ssc.1S AND ... ~S F'OI!: SAHITARY SFIEI UTUTES NIO lJ1UTY PPEllNE:!'l Nl'CCTSI "S DESICRIBEtl lHERDN @PRIVATE MX:ESS TO SM) PRD1:iES IS ACROSS A RM.RO/I.I) -.n"-Of-WAY, "!HIS C!JW'NIY '1111..l. REQIJRE ffll\T ntE "PRIV ... lE ROADWAY AND atOSSlfG AGREEMElfl". ANO HIY ~ OR MIODIRCl'.lll»IS 1HEJ!EOf' 'M-fOl 'IIERE ISSUm BY 1HE RNUNJ/1.0 COW'ANY, BE 9JIIMITTED FOR ~1ION. "Ill[ ~11<1:~~=~~·C::::s~ss PRO\o1SIONS Mi OCINT111NED 11€REJtt If" NO "A(HDID!l" OC1S1S. 1HE fOR™ca,9fG PCUCY(l£S) llll..L CONT»! 1HE FOllilwtfC EXCEPTION: TIIE UiCK Df RIGHT CF" ,lCCESS TD Alll1 F11011 TI£ I.AND ACROSS A RNUNJM:I Rl<lffT-CF"-••W. IS. ANY QlD1KIN AS TO 1HE 1R.1E I.OCl'.llOII CF" 1t£ U.TER/1.l BOlN)N!IES CF" lHE SAID 2N1 a.AS5 SHCREI.ANDS. 1&. RIGHT CF" 1HE ST/l.1E OF -IN AND TO 1H-'l PGITlCIN, ..-HIY, Ill' THE PRtFERlY 1E!E111 bESCRIBfll 'MIIOl LES BELOW 1WE UN[ CF" ORON,O.Ry HGH W""IER Of LAKE W"5HINGTON. 17. R1GH1$ OF 1t£ GetER/1.l Pl.a.JC T1J TI£ UNRES1RICTEl) USE CF" AU. TI£ W/1.ltRS CF" II N/1.WWILE BODY CF" WATER NOT CN.y FOIi lHE PIIIMARY PURPOSE CF" NA'1G-'11CM, BUT .USO FOR CQla.LJRY PUMPO!ES; INCI..IJCIING (RUT NOT UllllED m) flSHMO, 90ol.11NC. 111'.n.KJ, -, W.O."IER !l<ltfO /HJ ontEJt REJ.>,lED REtJIEATl(INAI.. PURPOSES. 4S n!OSE WATERS IIAT ""1'ECT lHE T10El.AN)S. SHORElAK'S OR ~ Uf'Ll,NJS /HJ WME1HER THE l£'¥tl. Cl' TI£ Wl'.10 HAS BED! RAISED NAlU!I.W.Y OR NflFICLlilY TO A IIIMITMIED CR FllJCTU"TlNG ~ 1111. AS fl/RTHER WIN[() BY 11-£ O£l]5K]IIAI. LAW CF" THIS STATE, (AFr"ECTS JU Ill' T1tE PRDISES 9J&IECl TO SUCH SIJBMER(EIC[) Ill. TERMS, OIJNOll10NS. Pl!O'll9CINS MID S11PU..ATIONS CF" 1HE J0NT "91M!E AtRDEfT Cl' CUEHOAl.l TERl,IINALS, II W"5HINCTON JOINT \0!11.IRE. A COPY Of 11€ CUlRElfT ...cllEDEJ,IT AND ANY AIIENIJIIElfT5 WSl BE SUIMT1Ell Emill!....m C1JllillSI, NIY cctMYN.c:E OR DfCIJIUt/l.NC[ CF" 1HE JDIHT \OITlllE PRDPERlY IIJST 8E El<ECl.llUI BY JU OF 1HE J0M" \Ol1Ull£R. H. mu: T1J \£ST ti NI IHCOMING O'/ltl!:R ljll105E NMIE ts NOT OISC1.0SED. !UCH NAME i,a.JST BE FUffll$tf[() TO US SO TIIAT A NAME SEARCH IIAY BE MADE. 20. lHE 1ERIIS /HJ ~ CONTAl'ED Ill TI£ DOOJIE(f DrnlUD "(lll()IN.t,l'IC NO. ~ RECCRlED AUCUST 10. 2008 AS 2DCIIJOll100011184 Cl' OfOOM. M"""' 21. UNR£C0RDE0 l£ASEH(l.DS. IF" NIY, ~ Ill' \elOORS N,f} SECUlllllY MlREDIENT C1N PERSCN/1.l PROl'£RTY N«1 RIOHTS OF 100,HlS. MID Sl"Cl.fflll PARTIES "IO REMOVE lRMlE Fl~ -'l lllE EXPIIATlON Ill' 11£ 1ERII. AREA TABLE PARCEL ""' AREA Of TOTAL PARCEL 1,375.165 SO. FT. PE.R LEGAL DfSCRIPTION OR 31.5694 AC. LOT 1 50,523 SQ FT OR 1.1667 AC. LOT ? 75,545 SQ. FI. OR 1.7343 AC LOT 3 BJ,819 SO. FT OR 1.9247 AC. LOT 4 146,7/4 SQ. FT. OR 3.JB18 AC. LOT 5 218.794 SQ rT. OR s.ons AC. LOT 6 109,485 SQ. Fl. OR 2.5134 AC LOT 7 50,725 SQ. FT. OR 1.1645 AC PRIVA TI ST. D 15,.'>?9 SO. FT. OR 0.3442 AC PRIVAIT ST E 12,636 SO. FT. OR 0.2901 AC PUBLIC S1REETS 161,?43 SO. f T. A,8ANllC OR 3.7DH5 AC PORTION OF TOT/IL 449,789 SO. FT. PARCEL LYING Vr1THIN OR 10.3257 AC LAKE WASHINGTON NOTES: -LOTS I AND 5 ARE BOUNDED ON THF WEST BY THE SHORE QI-LAKE WASHINGTON, SHOWN AS TH[ "OHVl'\I" (ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK). -43,833 SO FT OF LOT 1 UFS WITHIN TII[ 100' SHORELINE SETBACK. -106,703 SQ FT or LOT 6 LIES Vr1THIN THE 100· SHORELINE. S[TUACK. SURVEYOR'S CER11F1CA TE """" M.ffiO Pft(ffRT1[S. IIIC. Me J.lf. 8AlCTDI a, CO. ATTN: ROBERT OKM 1100 s. 1MIRD S1RlET ROITlJtl, "" ll8037 """""" CEHIURT PACFIC, l.P. Alltf: CN,IPIE.1. ia.o.11£WSOII 1201 JIii) A~ 9.IITE 115110 Sf;AT1LE. WA 981DI UCDISED I.ANO SUR\£1'1'.R BUSH. ROEO AND ttmlHCS, INC. Anti; OAKII A. BE.J. 2009 litNCR A-..C EAST SE/I.TT1..E, W/1. 9'8102 .,..... l(Pff IXIN5tll.11NC EHGfoEERS ATTN: TOY J01£S 160! ~ 11-.C. SUl1E Ito() SE/I.TT1..E, WA 1111101 SITE ADDRESS: 4JIIO L./I.K£ WIISI-INGTON IWJ1£VARD """"" """'""' T.I.X AOIXIJNT NO.: m--.11C11J2-0J HORIZONTAL DA"IUW: NM 63/81; QTY Of RENTON IIOl«.IIIEN"ISsttcl'W'ltt,'RE:QN'fERE ...si1ED IN OCT08ER 1999 IJ:'ilNG II 'MU) r,;;,IIOllU £1£CT1!0MIC T11EOO[l.JTE, SERIAL NUIEt 337180. --~ ~ : COWIIERaAL/OfRC[/RnAL S£TI)ACl(S: ~ TllOUCH SITE DE'o(l()Pl,l[NT PLAN REYIEW. PER OTY OF RENltlN lill.ll.cFAL CODE 4-2-1208. DfQ ABAUClf KNOW AU. PEDPLE BY ~ PRES(MTS TIIAT \IE. lHE 1.N)[R9lHll OWINERS Ill' IN1EREST III ltE I.ANO KREIN 0£S<HBED IIAKE: A QNDIHO SITE PL.AH l'UISUNIT TO CHAPltJI !111..17 R.C.W. AND DEQ.lif!E T1iE BINDING SITE PLAN m BE II GRN"HIC IIEPR~T/1.Tla-l Of 1HE SAIi[ lff) ™AT SAID 9Ml*CI SITE !'LIN IS 111.lOE 'Ill™ Fml: CONSENT ""'° IN .i.c<:a!DJ.IICE "MlH10l DESIRE OF THE ~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF 'ffE SET HANDS AND SEALS; oornJRY PJ.CS'1C, LP. ~ '"~ APPROYA! s; CITY OF REHTOtt ADMINISTRATOR OF Pl.ANNING / BUILDING / PUBLIC WORKS ElW,INEO /WD N'PROW:ll PER RCW M.17.1IIO {1) lHIS __o"y CF" 21L..., ADIIINISTR.I.TOR. OlY Of RDITDN KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS Ell-ED ANO N'PRO\UI 1HS __DAY CF" 20_ KING COUNTY ~ OEPIJlY ICIIIC 00.INTY ASSESSOII KlNG COUHTI FINANCE Dlv1SION CERTIRCATlCN t ~y CERTf'Y "IWIT ""-l PROF'fflY TA:ES loll£ PAID, ™H T11ERE M. HO DELJNQJENT ~ ASSESSIIENTS CERll'1ED TO 1111S OFl1CE A;R CCl.ilCllON AND ™AT ALL SP£C00. "5SESSMEH"TS CEITFE> m TKS Off1CE Fa! CIJU.£t:110N ON .o.HY Of 1HE PROPtR1Y ttER£IN CONTAINED DEDICAT[D AS S1RELlS, MJ.EYS OR ANY OTHER PUil.iC USE. ARE PAID IN fUL TltS _____..I1AY Of" 20_ DIRECTOR. IDl<IG ~lY CF"flCE OF" flNfJICE •SI.ANO ""7' I IINRR ~" W~Sl-<l~TON ~, W.0.5'HNCTOPi sew ~ 1, RE<XRll OF SIJRl,EY RECORO[l) UNDER R[C(RIJING NlUBER :!OOO(l2D!19()(1(1(15, IIECCM:IS OF l(t,ic COUNTY, ST/I.TI: Of W/1.!HNGTON. CONTR_QL DIAGRAM 1"=1000' E 1/4 SEC. 29 ftl J/8" BRONZE Pl.00 NO Pl.ltOl 1H COIie. POST. DH. 0.B' IN CASE U INT. OF SE 1mn ST, .t IIB"lff AYE. SE. S'jj 1/4 5£CTION 2'9 T24N,45E 00\I'!. LOT ~ ~ .# ~· NW 1/4 S£CT10N J2, T24N.~5E O..Ov'T. LOT 1 r.~.s, E•1~.3807 sr 1/4 S£C1l0tl 29. T.'4N,45E SE COR. SEC. 211 ftl ~ 1/2" El'!l'.SS asc W/ ~ c»,a CDIC. l'-'I ~~~i;:~i SE 801H ST. le 118TH ~I ~~SE. ~· H-!116t88.911 E•l.5083'80.IIOSI _ ] -...--, NSS'H'oe•w ,61J 21· ftl ,/If' UROIZE PUIG NO PllNCM IN COIIC POSl. DIC. D.!i' IN CASE. SE CORNER oov'T. LOT !i f..~744.32311 E•t30J747.-4 BINDING SITE PLAN -QUENDALL TERMINALS CENTURY PACIFIC, L.P. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON This mop correctly represenls a survey mode by me or under my direction in conformance with lhe requirements of the Survey Recording Act ot the reques\ of CENTURY PACIFIC LP. _ in ---• 20 ~ BUSH~.~R~O~E~D~&~H~IT~C~H~l~N~G~S~,~IN~C~. DRAWN BY LMK/msl DAT[: 01/11/16 IJOR fl ;,oogoso.04 Certl!icote No. J7~ EXHIBIT 5 CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS = MIHOR ~\IE~UE U,ST SE:~TTI.L VMSI-INGTOH 9.f'102-~5U 1i~ JQ::.w; r~x, (2001 J2J-11J~ CHECKED BY DAB SCALE: NA SHffT 1 OF 5 n I n n ~ n 0 "' ~ 0 ,. "' 0 ~ > ~ "' ~ ~ ~ ' Bi g d a z .. \ \ \ \ \ ____ I ----,-.. , t--------- 1 ----------' \ INNER H~RBOR UNE i I I r '(}..i I 1- I I 1 --l .-! f ~ .. \ • ~*i\ 'i';.\<u-,} ~i~:. '\~ ~~ ~ \ C(p)°(f>) • \ """'' \ ~ <:,'!i,.\ ~"" :@ 1,,."a>'v .-:.~\ -1) ~ •¢ IO"OII W(P) I I I - ""' ¢ = -[I] rn SW 1/4 SECTION 29, T24N, R5E, W.M. LEGEl'lD ~ EUCTRICAI. VAULT " --" O!'.CTRICAI. TRIIHSF"ORWR 0/H [/T 0\0:1£ADEU:c:TRIC/ID..EJ'li(M: """" ""' ~ """""""" ,, """ ·~ ll.Cl'4IOFF Y/IJ..Vf. -FOlN> ~ ROD AND CN' o-----0 POWER POI.[ W/ UGffT --~ """'-~ ~, PolMlEO lJlllJTY LOCA llON "-= 1 ---,,, RCCOIIO UllJTY LOCAllON "00 SfHTAAY SC'IIER CI.EANOUT CENTER OF al"""°-GAS V"-l\lE " SAIITARY !£tlDI """""' ' ,~- ~ '"' """ -@ SANITARY SOIIEJl MAHHCk.E M~ Nfl _, oo, ..... ., ,__ =--• N«RT El£YA110N -@ STCffil[lllAII -Cl.t: "\ .0 H ,, ·= ~f;'<'~ 'v-:," ....._,..;,," • .... ~ .... ·..t"'..t A ;,~ ~... !,0 L_ m ""'""' ""' • 1EllPtlCl'C sat1RY IIQ)( ,v 1EI..EPHOI£ VNA.T -""'""'•••m ~ TOP n.EVATQ ffi W ... TER IETER ® WATER MNll-!Olf: • M--w MTER VMA.T W.l,lBI V/IJ..\IE DA'!E OF TOf'O(lRN'HC WAPl'ING nELDWORI(, .JJN£. 2ooe ,,.•,::J..~~ INLET T T!;r:?fJ.81§ " -" '" ' J _ _ _ _ f wss(,) I "·"*~-1 I -----I 'i,,';~ ~ .,,_.-,, I 12"0IP'll(P) ~ $ -~ ,----~-f~ ~<"°¥, \ I I ' -~ ,,,v I > -~ q,~'ft \ I O .,_ -----"f------r·------;::;;-----,-----~-=~--:::'.'..'._~::~ "'--<> '~p.. \ f. .,,. .. ---~~~ $ \ ---_-i, ~ A 12"•S5(R) I ( B<"IJETRO S£WER{RJ • : A I ~-~ \ I ~'f" 3 ! 1-,'\ b \~I i C, \$. \ \ a '.j~ ~~ 12· 011' W(P) > [ ? \ BNRR RIGHT OF WAY 11J(P) I I I I I I \ \ -----------'---I ----\ ---'---~ -~--v' ~·01pl'll"R> ""' ) !U~~ER~ m(P ~~ o/1-1 u,1 \ -- ~") o--, " , c;/:~ n.>(P) -~"' ~o., -..:..::, ® ------- " 'I' ' o _ _ ___ )_ IJ" OIP "'(i.) 0,1J Eu " -----'\---------\ --\ "'' ------------~ ---" " ------------- 5 '-./}.. ---------------\ ~~ ~ oft' ~&tT UT\11'.P) ~ 'li-,..,. ----------= 'b ~ it·p~ ----I.A1CE .~a.w.------------ ' --, \'.\ \~ ~~ 1(•21j.79 "''~s; 1, 0 ----------- ¢ qo) • ~ EXISTING UTILITIES M BINDING SITE PLAN -QUENDAll TERMINALS CENTURY PACIFIC, LP, <I) i;i <I) :,: a ... ~~~ i i i j/ I CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, STA TE OF WASHINGTON c:a:::J --{ IN P'IBT ) lmoh-20 ft. BUSH~.~R~O~[~D--::-&-.,.,Hl~T=cH~l~N~G=s-, 7,IN~C~. CIVIL ENGINEERS &: LAND SURVEYORS ORA'M-J BY L~K/TRS DATE: 01 /11 /16 JOB # 2009050.04 200i MINOR ~\IENOC EAST rM"~s~SHltlGTON ,!~:N.::~ v~,, (206) J2J-71J5 CHECKED BY DAB SCALE: 1" 20' !SHEET 3 OF 5 ~ !2 a "' T " _, t e o/fl T -----"" ----- ,,,, . ltl(P) ·~· 1!•26.87c:J ' ,0· ~%,;\ \, \,.ii ·t?: "q;'~ ?, 1-'8 £1.£c~1c PA,tEt_ ~ ,-- ~rr, -· " i G(P) • SW 1/4~Sl:_l,11UN°'29, -----,~~ ,\::,E, W.M. !2"SS(R) ,_M & llfe RIGHT OF WAY m(e) 0/11 t . ""1(QfP}::: "., Of" • 6" DIP l\t"R) :S i_i•sS(R) " • m " " m(e) --T -------- " ffl !2 a "' Oft! r&r· Jt;u:r rr-~1.2.11 lNCE WASHN01tlN 11..\0. _l ------_ ---_ {flllL Of' OIRr} --------------------------------------------------- " -> ""' ~ "'" "" r,o~ 11:.,~<.4 ~(IP) ~--l --CI::] i • i i { II( 1'Q!' l 1 illloh • 2D ft. G(P) INlH 1£•J8.93 (10~TICAt.lP)D / r O/lt r.i:r "'' SHEET LAYOUT I BUSH~.~R~O~E~D~&~H~IT~C~H~IN~G~S-, ~IN~C~. Cl','IL ENGINEERS & LANO SURVEYORS xiog MIHOR A\IENUE: EAST SEA m..E:, WASH!NGTON 9510>-35!~ (20B) 323-~1« 1-soo-n~= FAXf (106) 313-7135 G(i") " EXISTING UTILITIES BINDING SITE PLAN -QUENDALL TERMINALS CENTURY PACIFIC, LP. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON DRAVw'N BY U,O(j1RS DATE: 01/11/16 JOB # 2009050.04 CHECKED BY DAB SCALE: 1" 20' !SHEET 4 OF 5 ffl !I! a ... SW 1/4 SECTION 29, T24N, RSE, W.M. ___ ) ', --------'--------~--------·---------------" '\' 0/11 E • 01" '\ ', " ,. BNRR RIGHT Of WAY f /0 l,!AR,([R ,;j TO(P) 0/>H T2" .DI_~ W{P) f • ,;:,'.9;';.,~ r•' V o,~;;.·,:i. f_."'f,. \ •g p "' • a "' Do\oo •I DD ~ a ~ "%\ '" D" " ~ ! j ,, • 12' 'i)II' 'jj\P) l• ~\~~ i Q, .-:,.·~ -i,i'1-,, 'l; !'/" ,'!! ,"? TD(l'J SHEET LAYOUT T?"SS(R) • y'r/0 1,1,1,~ER ~·& "• [; '" ~:t'\~~ ~ Q, ~ 't,. ~ F\ 8~"Mfll10 ~.,. .19 ~wm(R) -----~-------r--------------------"-------------- --------~ ( • ED(P) [!y] O.hfT ~ r, 0/i< T ~ ____....g C(P) 0/H T .., G(P) ~ C(PJ 1'fri. ~ lNCE -LW. __j ~:jj,0--,: ·~~~ I ------------------___ %[,.:_ _________ _c _________________ _ ca - 0/fj UT E-,-3 / i i i (Ilffm) IIDob•20 I\. "'' 0/H EU j " C ~ BUSH-.-R~O~E~D~&~H~,r~c-H-IN~G=s-.-,N-C~. CIVIL ENGINEERS & LANO SURVEYORS Z009 Wl'IOR A'IEN~ FAST SEATTU. ffASHIOK!TON 9mo2-J513 ,iW-tM=~ f,l,Xf (20f.) .l2J-71J5 "" ' EXISTING UTILITIES BINDING SITE PLAN -QUENDALL TERMINALS CENTURY PACIFIC, L.P. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON DRAWN BY L~K/TRS DATE: 01/11/16 JOA# 2009050.04 CHECKF:D BY DAB SCALE: 1" = 20· I SHEET 5 OF 5 HILLIS CLARK MARTI'.'< & PETERSON P.S. I 22 l Second A venue, Suite 500 Seattle. WA 98l01-2925 Telephone: (206) 623-1745 CITY OF RENTON FEB 1 8 2016 Fax: (206) 623-7789 tJ: 09 RECEIVED I I, M CITY CLERK'S OFFICE f'., ( Attorneys for Applicant Century Pacific, LL.LP. In re: CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER ' i(lhi( /t(tpC r~/ I Project No. LUA09-I 51 QUENDALL TER.\11NALS FEIS AND i MITIGATION DOCUMENT. SEPA APPEAL! JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL I. STIPULATION IT JS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto that the above- entitled cause, having been fully settled and compromised, may be dismissed with prejudice through entry of the subjoined Order of Dismissal. with each party to bear its own costs. DATED this J.S!;;~y of February, 2016. Hll.L!S Cj,.ARK MARTIN & P,ETERSON P.S. By ~< 1U · ~,,A Amit D. Ranade, WS A #3487& Ann .M. Gygi, WSBA #19912 Attorneys for Applicant Century Pacific, LL.LP. II. ORDER OF DISMISSAL Tl HS MATTER came before the Renton Hearing Examiner on the foregoing Stipulation of the parties. Based on the foregoing Stipulation, the Renton Hearing Examiner .!OJNTST!PULATlON AND PROPOSED ORDER DISMlSSIXG APPEAL WITH PRE.JUDICE -I HILLIS Cl.ARI( MARTIN & PETERSON P.S. 1221 Second Avenue. Suite 500 Sealtte. WA 98101·2925 TelepMne. (206) 623-1745 Fax: {206) 623-7789 EXHIBIT 6 hereby ORDERS, ADJL!JGES, and DECREES that the appcai of Quendall T c:nninals Project LlJA09-151 and ail claims all~gcd hy the parties are her1eby DIS:\l!SSED WITH PREJUDICE, and ~ach party will bear its own costs. DATED this of Presented by: HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON P.S. Bv lh1.-{, ·7l{ · ffi;qt. ' Amit D. Ranade, WSB'""""A""#"'3""48""7"'8 __ _ Ann M. Gvgi, WSBA #19912 Attomevs for Applicant Century Pacific, LL.LP. SOUTH END GIVES BACK ~!f/£:::z:z ~-~=-- ND: ! 9()5 8.. D03 48 53w2560-77:.6v l JOINT ST!PULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL WITH /'R£JUD/CE -1 H!tLIS CLARK MART!!\ & Pf:T£RS01' P.S. 1221 Second Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle. WA 98101,2925 Telephone: (206) 623-1745 Fax: (206) 623·7789 Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Staff, Phil Olbrechts <olbrechtslaw@gmail.com> Monday, February 22, 2016 9:59 PM brad nicholson ann.gygi@hcmp.com; cmathewson@centurypacificlp.com; Jason Seth; Vanessa Dolbee; Cynthia Moya; Larry Warren Re: Renton -Quendall Homes (LUA-09-151) Follow up Flagged This will be the last addition to the email string regarding the FEIS appeal. As requested before, please have five copies ready for the hearing should anyone need to sec these emails when I disclose these ex parte contacts with Mr. Nicholson. Mr. Nicholson, I would normally not further complicate the record of this case by further communications with you, but it appears that there is some major misunderstanding or miscommunication going on and I want to take one last attempt at rectifying iL 1 wish [ could just talk to you about this, but as the decision maker my ability to communicate with you is very limited due to the reasons identified in my first email to you. Ultimately, however, this will have to be our last communication regarding your appeal unless you plan on making some motion that you entered into the stipulated dismissal order due to some form of fraud or misrepresentation. Any other further information you want me to consider should be sent exclusively to the planning staff as comment on the application. As I idl'ntified in my first email to you, I don't become involved in an appeal until it's time to consider whether a prehearing conference or email exchange is in order. This usually occurs four to six weeks prior to the scheduled appeal date. In this case you would likely have received an email from me to all appeal parties inquiring whether the parties wanted to resolve some prehearing procedural issues or otherwise desired a prehearing order outlining hearing procedures. A request for such a prehearing order is usually initiated hy one of the appeal parties, but l will often initiate that inquiry on my own if no one beats me to it. I will also address any proposed orders or prchearing motions when they come in. Beyond this, planning and city clerk staff are responsible for processing an appeal. The role of City staff and myself does not change because you've persuaded staff to send me your notice of appeal earlier than the completion of the staff report. I'm not sure what type of response you were looking for from your appeal statement. If you just wanted an acknowledgement that your appeal had been filed. then staff would be responsible for that. If they don't issue some sort of acknowledgment as a matter of course, I'm sure they would provide you with something upon request. If you had any questions about how the appeal would be processed or scheduled, all you had to do was ask staff. [f you disagreed with how staff was handling some prehcaring procedural issue regarding your appeal, you were free to either file a motion with myself ahead of time or to raise the issue at the hearing. If you had made a legally compelling argument that consolidation should not have occured during your appeal hearing, I would not have had any problem segregating om your appeal (although for future reference. the SEPA rules requiring consolidation are fairly clear and I've yet to come across any argument to the contrary). If you are upset because l didn't read your appeal months prior to ,he appeal hearing, there is no reason l.o be. There's nothing l could ha,e done with any knowledge [ would have gained from reading your appeal months in advance. Reading appeal statements too for in advance (especially those exceeding the more typical 10 pages and under) can be a tremendous waste of time since the appeal can easily be narrowed or even withdrawn over time and also because I will have lo re-read everything once the hearing date is close. Excluding any prchearing motions or orders that may be presented to me, I only need to know about the details of your appeal in time for the hearing on your appeal. For the stipulated motion to dismiss, I just needed documentation establishing what hearing pc1rties should be included in the order, and I got that information when you pointed out that your notice of appeal had been emailed to me months earlier. If you had not agreed to have your appeal dismissed, I would have read your entire notice of appeal prior to the hearing and I would have gone through it with a fine toothed comb after the hearing as I prepared my (kcision. !r's entirely possible that you would not have liked the result of my decision on your appeal, but I can assure you that you would not have been able to sincerely assert that your issues had not hecn thoroughly reviewed and addressed. Once the hearing on Quendall is over and the appeal period has expired l will be happy to discuss this with you further (assuming the discussion doesn't relate to some other pending appeal or application). Also, if it wasn't clear to staff before, it is appropriate for staff to recommend to the parties of an appeal that they request some sort of prel1earing conference or email exchange from me if the appeal parties have procedural questions about the conduct of a hearing. For appeal parties represented by attorneys (which has usually been the case), there isn't much confusion about how to participate. For unrepresented citizens, however, I'm sure there's room for improvement as to how to make hearing participants comfortable with the process. Land use appeals in Renton are rare, especially when they involve unrepresented parties. On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at l :48 PM, brad nicholson <brad827@hotmaiLconp wrote: your Honor. Well I want to apologize but well it took 5 months to get a response·' the appeal notice i.e "The facts are dispositive" while it look 24 hours to respond to the PRP's I am just wondering do you need to have the EPA sign off on the case too! It could be Cami Grandinetti. Respectfully Brad Nicholson From: L Warren@Rentonwa.gov To: olbrechtslaw@amaiLcorn; brad827@hotmaiLcorff CMova@Rentonwa.gov: VDolhee@Rcntonwa.oov· ........ ____ · ............ .,. ____ , ~ .,_. V t JScth (4~ Rcntonwa.gov; cma__thc_\y_)p1_1 Ci:h:enturypacif.1..~:..Lr--corn; ann, gygi (f{: hfn}.P..:.~9111 Subject: RE: Renton -Quendall Hornes ( LUA-09-151) Date: Mon. 22 Feb 20lfi l(i:38:55 +0000 Mr. Olbrechts, the city has no objection to the stipulated order. If you have any questions, please let me know. From: Phil Olbrechts [mailto:olbre.chtslaw@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 7:44 AM To: brad nicholson; Cynthia Moya; Vanessa Dolbee; Larry Warren; Jason Seth; crnathc.,y5gn@centurypacificlp.com; 2 ann.gygi'.il:hcmo.com Subject: Re: Renton· Quendall Homes (LUA·09·151) All Appel I ants, The proposed stipulated order is missing one of the parties to the appeal. As outlined in RMC 4-8-1 l O(E)(7), the City is a party to the appeal. I will sign the stipulated order if I get email confirmation from the City that it has no objection to the stipulated order. Please note Mr. Nicholson has sent me another email, included in this email string, that was not cc'd to the other parties to the appeal. As before, I request that staff include this updated email string as one of their hearing exhibits. They should also have five copies of this email string available at the hearing so that I can disclose the ex parte communications with Mr. Nicholson and give the opportunity for the public to review and respond to those communications. ln response to Mr. Nicholson's second email, as noted in my last email to him, I received a copy of his notice of appeal (all 200+ pages) as an email attachment from the City Clerk's Office last September. Other than a response from staff as to whether they have an objection to the stipulated order, I ask that I receive no further communications from the parties on the appeal regarding the appeal. For the reasons outlined in my last email to .Mr. Nichols, it is important that pre·hearing ex parte communications be limited as much as possible. On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 8:49 PM, brad nicholson <brnd827@hotmail.com> wrote: Your Honor, I can recall with crystal clarity. 5 weeks after filing the appeal, I called the City Clerk and requested information about why l received no acknowledgement of its receipt or correspondence whatsoever. Tt would appear that [ have been involved in as many appec1ls in Renton as you have and in the pasL the normal process has been to give a short explanation of what is going on. At first the Clerk told me that he had posted it on the web and that I would need to talk to Staff about ir. I had complained to him that I had spent considerable lime and had addressed the appeal ID you and not to staff. \1y comment letter was addressed to staff but my appeal notice along with $250.00 was addressed to you according to staff instructions. The Clerk then assured me in no uncertain terms that the appeal document went directly to you and that you had a copy of it in your possession. I complained to him that I paid the fee for the appeal to go to you and not to staff. Thus I am surprised that you would indicate that you have no documents. I am also surprised that you did not get it and it was never in your possession. I am just saying that ! had also been quite disturbed that stuff had been the ones to decide on tbe appeal consolidation even though I think you are correct in presuming that it may have been generally known to be the case. But I had not understood that they had jurisdiction to decide issues of Law in a pending appeal. Respectfully 3 Brnd :'~icholson Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 06:07:51 -0800 Subject: Re: Renton. Quendall Homes (LUA-09-151) From: olbrechtslaw@gmail.com To: brad827@hotmail.com; CMova@rentonwa.~ov; VDoibee@rentonwa.gov; LWarren@rentonwa.gov; JSeth@rentonwa.gov; cmathewson@centurvpacificlp.com; ann.gvgi@hcmp.com Staff, Please include this email string in the exhibits to the staff report on the Quendall Homes application. Mr. Nicholson, Thank you for the clarification of Quendall Homes. Twill likely send out a signed order tomorrow once I've had an opportunity to review the tiled notice of appeal. From your assertions that I may have '"forgotten" information that you apparently believe I at one point knew or should have known about your project, it appears you might have some misunderstanding about my level of involvement in your case prior to hearing. By a combination of law and necessity. I'm essentially required to know as I ictle about your project as possible until staff has completed its staff report and list of proposed hearing exhibits. By state statute and numerous court opinions I am not allowed to engage in conversations with staff, the applicant or any hearing party about the substamive merits of your case outside the hearing process. Because of these legal requirements, you can be assured that all of my knowledge about your case is strictly limited to the testimony presented during the project hearing and the exlnbirs admitted into evidence. This puts you on equal footing with all other hearing participants and ensures 1hat you have the opportunity to address any evidence presented to me that you may believe to be inaccurate or incomplete. Up until today my knowledge of your case had been limited to knowing it's big, controversial and involves a superfund site. The only reason [ knew this much is because every few weeks I ask the planning manager if anything big is coming up, so that I may plan my schedule and workload in advance. Land use appeals (as opposed to applications) sometimes involve a little more advance informarion due to the necessity to sometimes hold preheuring conferences. Prehearing conferences arc prchcaring meetings or email exchanges with appeal hearing participants designed to address procedural is,ues in advance in order to provide fr,r a mme efficient appeal hearing. Issues usualiy held at prehearing conferences typically im;Jude setting limits on the time for testimony, requiring the parties to identify witnesses and exhibit,, and setting deadlines for prehearing motions and briefing. If no party has specifically requested a prchearing cont'crence, I will typically ask for a copy of 4 the notice of appeal four to six weeks in advance of a scheduled appeal hearing to determine whether a prehearing conference would be useful. As best as I can recall, Renton has only had a couple land use appeal hearings in the last five years that I've worked with the city. Renton is unique amongst my thirteen hearing examiner clients in that it apparently regularly sends me a copy of the appeal statement before I ask for it and before the staff report is complete. There's nothing wrong with that practice. since it's fairly clear that the appeal statement will be included in the staffs exhibit list once the staff report is completed. However, it's not going to attract my notice until I get close to the appeal hearing and start considering the merits of a prehearing conference. From your email response yesterday I was able to find an email from the City Clerk's office from last September that contained an attachment of your appeal statement. That should give me the information I need to ensure that the stipulated order includes all necessary parties. Your email also asserts that I've forgotten about a consolidation order. It's fairly undisputed that state law requires an appeal of FEIS adequacy to be consolidated with the hearing on its underlying permit application. I would be surprised if staff found it necessary to ask me about consolidation. Also, as previously discussed, the circumstances under which staff can talk to me about a case are very limited outside the hearing process. I don't recall making any comments to staff regarding consolidation but if I did you are correct that I have forgotten about it. On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:30 At\1, brad nicholson <brad827@hotmail.com> wrote: Your Honor, You may be looking for "Quendall Homes" according the previous email. The documents concern "Quendall Terminals" EIS decision which you decided to consolidate with lhe Master plan hearing around 5 months ago. Vanessa Dolbee informed me that is was because of "State Law" You may have forgotten about it but the appeal documents were sent directly to you from the clerk Jason Seth. You may have also forgotten it was an appeal that was 288 pages against the adequacy of review where you be approving the Master Plan for around 700 houses next to the Seahawks training facility on the superfund site that will undergo cleanup after you take your actions? Respectfully, Brad Nicholson Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:32:57 -0800 Subject: Re: Renton -Quendall Homes (LLA-09-15 l J From: olbrechtslaw@omail.corn 5 To: CMova@renronwa.29_y CC: VDo! bee (q) renton wa. :Iov; L \Varrcn@rentonv;u.gov; :l Seth @1 rentonwa. '-"'Ov; cmathewson@centuryinci fie Ip.corn; brad8 ~7 (a) hotmail .corn; ~rrn. £vgi@hcmp.com Please confirm that all parties to the SEPA appeal have signed the stipulated order to dismiss. 1 have no documentation on the appeal, so I have no knowledge of what parties are involved. On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Cynthia Moya <CMova@rentonwa.gov> wrote: Mr. Olbrechts, We have just received a Joint Stipulation & Proposed Order Dismissing Appeal in the Qucndall Terminals FEIS & Mitigation Document, SEPA Appeal (File #LU A-09-151). The parties have asked that you sign the attached document as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please feel free to call Vanessa at 425-430-73 [4. Thank you. Cindy Moya, Records \!an:1gcmcnt Speciafo,t City of Renton -Administrative Services/City Clerk Division cmoy_a (4; rentonv,.·a. gov 425-430-65 l 3 _ ____.1r'~; · b ' ' I ~i m Al'PAOXlM.lITLY UACREOf" l!IDOOR AND/OR Ol/TVOOR MU FOR ACTM MCRE#l,Tl(lM SHAU. BE C>EVELOPEO ON THE l'lAZA/1',1,ll<) PECKS DURING FIN.\!. DESIG'-1 D£YE1DPMDIT \-'\ \. "' \• ~ ~ i ~<> 'Z-~ .. • ..,.1, .,, ";, "!; ':> t % '4,rEw_.. "'"'-lff/NGroN \(~: \ I ~ ~ \ \ SITE & BUILDING SUMMARY \\ BUllDINQ OOIIE: 2009 lilC sm:mMING.COII \ ~~'.:1~ ri::,\lfJN ~~~::: Sl'RINKLEJIED \ MAX. BlllU>INIJ HEIGHT: ll) Slt>RIE5 OR US" \ TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNRS AREA ~ $W 1 RE$ID£NTIAL (6 FlOO!I$ & 71 IJM1$) • 78,iOOld \ \ SW 2 RESlDENT\IIL (5 FlOOl'I$ II, 8(1 UNflS) • 18.DOOsl SW 3 RESIDEKTVIL (4 FlOOl'I$ & 84 UNml) • TD,400sl :~::i=:::!':1~M~):7!: \'- _, RE!m>UIIW. i4FI.OOIIS f._lifi UNITS)• 61.IIO(lsf ~\ SE 1 RESIDDITVIL (5 FLDOR5 & B2 UMITSJ • 711,1.00sl SE 2 RESlDEllllAL ("4 FLOORS & 72 UMJTSl • T9.200tl \ t/E i RESIDEMIIIL 15 FLOORS &U UNIB) • Til,100o1 \ ME2RESIDEMlllLl4FLODR5&72UNrTS)•7',200,I 1, TOT.ll.RUII.OING.lA-·737.DOOof ' TOT""-RE!;T,WRA,r.rTAREA•9,000s! TOT"'1.RETM.AREA•20.025sl TOTAL PARKING AREA SW LDWDI PARKl'-'G I.EYEI. • U5, ........ "1fi UIWER PARlll'-'G LfVEL • 41.300tf SE LDWDI l'ARKI~ 1.F1U. • ll4,S70sl NE LOWER PARIUllli IE'IEl • 75,,!)(Jof ·~ ~ I \c·-,, 1<>1""'-WIVut ~MKING;LfVEL MEA5•3l!7.34(1$1 TOTAL ENCLOSED AREA• 1.123,365sf Sl'ROCTUAAl RESll>ENTl#d.,::0LIITYMDS-117,600tt ·~· Sll'ltJCYI.IIIA °"81 PMIIIMI DECKS• !4z™ TOTAL AREA • 1.3:24,965sf '6 -; "'~ . ', ':)(. 'o ~ Q)i~ ~ ~ "'&t. ~ ) ~~\ <)l"o--~~ j ) j" _.,, -------~ I ~~ 'i l POST DEVELOPMENT ACREAGES BUILT AREA (IMPERVIOUS AREA) BUILDING AREAS • 8UILDING AREAS • 187,350s1 PARl<INQ DECK AREAS• 159,000.f PARKING DECK LANOSCAPE AREAS• 25,000sl COURTYARD PLAZAS• 1.17,60091 COURTYARD MISC. DECKS• 4,028sf TOTAL BUILDING AREAS • 392,978&f PAVEO AREAS (A.O.W., ROADS, PEDES1ll1AN/BIKE PATHS)• STIIEtT'A', 'B' & 'C' AREAS• 99,250s1' STREETii 'D' & 'E' AREAS• 23,522"! SIDEWALK ARfA • BD,SOO.I TOTAL PAVED AREAS• 183,572sf SURFACE PARKING AREAS• 8-~~- TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREAS• 665.548"1 PERVIOUS AREA DESIGNATED NATURAL/OPEN SPACE AREA• 140,33!1al UNPAVED FIRE LANE/PEDESTRIAN TRAIL• 19,97()!1! STREET LEVEL LANDSCAPED AREAS• 15,lDOsl OTHER LANDSCAPED AREAS• 33,49551 LOT 7 SATELLITE PROPERTY• 60,72115'! TOTAL PERVIOUS AREAS• 259,B29sl UNIT SUMMARY SW RESIOEftlTIAL TOTAL UNITS• 2!i7 PNI RESIDEN'T1Al TOTAL UNITS• 127 SE RESIDENTIAL TOTAL UNITS• 154 NE RESIDENTIAL TOTAL UNITS• 154 TOTAL UNITS• 692 I, , DECK PARKING· ~~ se QUADRANI -:uiu Ut.l."' l'Alfl\lNI. ~IALU NE QUADRANT• 39 DECK PARKING STALLS TOTAL DECK PARKING• 169 STALLS :.11n11~ LAND AREAS G~OS6SITEAl'IEA •9ilfi,37kl "'171.IFIAL f'\J9UC OPEN SPACES: NAl\JRAl AREAS Al.ONO SHOREUNE TRAIi. • 1A0,339ol SHOREUNE RAE LAN~PEDESllllllN TRAIL 19,9.,,,,,,. SUB TDT~l -:L00,308&t -----~~ -----------+---------·--, LEGEND <.>ntER MEA5, STRHT UVEl. • 122, TJ!J.,l(EXCWl:IESS1DEW~LJl5 & lANOIICA~ lA'41SCAP[D COI.IRTYAROS • 117,IIODof $10EWAU<.'l, $1()£WAIJ!Sll,lf'\!9UCR.D.W.•3&,9DO,lf [XtSTING~ $1)EWALJ15 NOTIN P1111UCR.IJ.W •• 24.00\ls! L t<E:11' B" ':;t[)E:ll'~L< PAYUI PARMIO!Q MEA!I· A k r::- ~ ~~MIU'IO AREA -64.000d (INCUIDES SIDEWAUl!l & LANIISCAl'E) ~c WA , C SIJRfAt:E~ARl\lNGAAEA•!l'!JlOO LEGEND . 'S1.J; OOUlm"ARll "'15(;. Dfeit, -.._o_ ~ I I /\; G To lANDSCAPEAl'IEAS, IV STREITIE'l[LI.ANOSCAPE•e,3oa.1 OHWM BL V: OTHERLAND5CAPEAREA5•33,495of 60'W£nANDSEl1IAQt _.r-----....___ , 0 l0T7SATI:Un1PROPE11Tf•50.T2~ ~ ---......_ \ ·c- SLJ8 TOT Al AREA • 738,026sf 100' OHWN stTBACK ........__ __ '- BUILDING GROUND CQVER '" 187 350sf TOTAL AREA• 9:25,376sf WETtAND rDGE 6' DIKE: l.,INE: ""•e1<1c SC"lE: .,,// SC<LE ,• ~ so f ! ( ('Ii "<> ~ -------.....__ ', ~DUMPSTER/RECYCLE BII\I ~ llTIUTY AND ELECTRICAL SPACE ""11 EXrTSTAIR [i'j LOBBY AREA --~"s""~'~E•.1.·-""''c,,0';"7~----~ 50,725s' W, -~"'--A,:--c...._ ---~""" "~ -\jl __ QUENDALL TERMINALS -PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE RENTON, WASHINGTON CENTURY PACIFIC, LLLP EXHIBIT 7 .'""I C1m:i:\ :1; .im ~ . . VJ __J <( z i -:z: _J 2~=:J 0:::: ~ u W:r:;;:; I--Vl u <C <C :s: o_ _J z >- _JO~ <(' ~ z z 0 :t! t5 z w ::::i 0 • i: . ' '=I PO.O ~ LEGEND OrlWM 50 WETLAND '.:i(TGACK 100' OHWN S[H\ACK W!'TLAND EDGE --._,, .. _ j~ . - L,qk£rA, w45lflNGro,v : • . "," ,tll .fi. ~ /.-·-.. >. ";;, : ,. •,:: ~t6'~;~ ~~-... i !~ ~~ !·~--···. .• .· ·,. II' < ill ,& 41 ··~ ~· :"'ll•''li . ., ~'!_. *'/! J I ·. > '•>• ,,,, /j) '•· ,.111. ..· ,., ..... _ •. ···,'-c>C\.·~· . T'l ·F '-... . .. , .. , ,· ._; .. jl!! ·~ -, ·1 • .••. ·'"' ,a,· .... ~• e ,t ·--~ . .....,• ;,..._, -1 •• •• , ~ • ; • N l._ . -S :.m.-.,,, \ ,.., :i;} !-'"'1:,:: i···"'. ·-""'*'•i I ~: rr,_e"*l .... /4{',"·1,...,;• ~--* ' , .......... ~ ,:.,. ... ( ' ii' "1~:;, ~ ·•••• l (Illl '>,;: /Jt --' ' 1,at> "" l•* • kili.,. r.,;a;. 4''-' · l"' ... ,, ,;:, "-"'I" -'""'"'' ir-. ,.. ., I " "' • w · w.·J ' '" .... • ~' .. . t . p . "·· • -.,,~ "'1-~ ;I" , ~ " t • • , I ~ • ..,,, • , $ r,_.;.~ . :'.h.1 f'. .. I. i... i ~,, ~lL a • "° ,II .:, :. lf ' .''V 'llo\ ;,. ~ 1 (;''J '1ll• .. ot. ,; ,-. ,1! l ... ·.'.:q ·.•.·•.• .• ii i"' ... "'.i l.f .. ,,.:,l .. l)e• .. Q.i'. --~'\. , : I ' ~ ~ l ': ill l' \ « p ~ <' «o I : '. ~ ' -1 : fl ~ ! ,ft;: /, ....... --, 't•..& \' "'"'•? ...... •~, >; ti-•~ J• •"''IN -'• !'.pt. "" w , .,,. "l ! 1' lo "' ,I\ "'. L :;-. • 1, "'• • ~ ~ 1£;,'-I , \••4 •: "•, ~ , .r. )-1 /-~~~ ,.,. 1 : >11"'> J !.s! s: • ,i lh,-'lL .. . ., ..,I_~,-' ..... 1 · II! ii!'-· J., .-~; ,'.h, :::.st ~ ~ •"ir.'.i, ~ ... ,-·c: t! J·.· ., -di -.:w, .... _,._. "W'lr -,:\,"'IF"'. ~ ,:t. , ~ • ,i:."tt .i\ i, .. H i,«,, If} ~-~*•* •t {i1 _ .. .+ ~Ht~. e•'-' ,,> !(· .. ·:! . .,. ,, l.!:. !f V ,. .,.:!"." ill .. ,·-ll/''11. ·xc wy. ~ .,.,-... ~~#::.•'--""""'---, ··,ii.~r"--"'.:a~::-9 T·;·~-i __ ~ ..... ··· .. ~.,· ;'-,-.... ,..f ,l"~-~--·,.ir•. :.l".~ ~~ . ; ,:Alt 1t . .ij , -. "•: , ~ •.• ~', l .. " 1 r· I ''~ ~~~ ••• I ~"' --) ~: ..... ~ ., ~-----~-· ' ~:· !> ,_ 't. JI 1r "~' • i ~ ••• • ... 1 Is ti 1:: c 'it ~ti" e Tl":; '" •"•( , ,.,., ,.,1 , 1• • 1 8' ,-?, ~ .) / '~ 'i ' iifl I»] ' \ ,i,( ' d , '-11 -!I! ,,,. ~' -: :-, I .. l'e\ ., I 1·· .. I 1i I ,;, • • : •• ir -r ~ : .. " • :fi;'~ •• •. ~ "i!i') 'i.•-1 ''$ 1, ... f , . . .. . . I "' "' ; I • • • ' • "-"' \t'I •., ,•V•,, .\'" "'l• 1• 'i' •l·! ;t· ~\ , , "'iril~ (i .. ~-.,.~ ® ,.,"'(!) """® .,'l·ilf]. I """'-•'• L ••-, r I••' a, "', '!Ji -" ."'.'."9 It~ • .. ,.... __ ., @.Wf• I~.... -J ,I -~j/ -----. ,. f / .,. UNIT SUMMARY SW rn:s1DENT!Al TOTAL LNITS ~ 757 '-W FlfSlfJ[Nll~L TOTAL UNITS -127 SE Fl~Slll(NTl.,L TOTAL UNITS 15'1 NE RESIOENTl,,l TOTAL l~ITS -1~4 Till ~l UNl1S ~ 6'.12 DECK PARKING SE QUADRANT " 130 O((:K PMlKING STALLS NE QU/1DRM1,T = 39 D[CK PARKI\C ST,\LLS TOT~LDEC!'( P,l.RKIN(; ~ tf.9 ST,l.LlS ~"' LEGEND . DUMP5TE'R _. RECYCLE 81"1 UTILITY AND ELECffilCAL SPACE ---c~ EXIT S1AIR ,.~. LOSSY AREA i' ' '· •, PREFERRED-ALTERNATIVE QUENDALL TERMINALS RENTON, WASHINGTON CENTURY PACIFIC, LLLP ~ <( z ::'?! 0: w 1- ...1 ...I <( 0 z w :::;:i O' -' PO.C LEGEND OHWM 50' WETLAND SEf8ACI\ 100' OHWN SETBACK WETLAND EDGE ~ \ "o--v ~ .k • -Y1, .? ',, ,0 'l;, "!, '\ I ·•· .. '\ ii. : ' : '4,-, w. '.4S1t1,1tGro.1,, : ~·· :~,,., : q, \ ';"'\ ,,4-. ,, 9c \ ,,,, /,' ... _.,. ,• ~------------~-~~ .. ·( IL i -/ .,, 'o Y-':)~ ~""?" • 0 ~g,':r~ '% -i ~.:. i '% ~ ?Q,' I • .. : .. :,' j / 0 ''' ~,.,.,, .,,,;-; ~ f : " • ~ '> ~ "o-/ PARKING SUMMARY P-1 COVERED GARAGE PARKING: SW QUADRANT" 347 PARKING STALLS NW QUADRANT~ 95 PARI\INC, STALLS SE QUADRANT~ 31S PARKING STALLS NE QUADRANT~ 206 P,\RI\INC STJ\LLS TOT<l.L P·l PARKING F 966 STALLS SURFACE PARKING SW QlJADRol.NT ~ 151 SURFACE PARKING STALLS SE QUADRANT = 42 SURFACE PARIIING STol.LLS NW QUADRANT~ 38 SURFACE PARKING STALLS TOT Al SURFJ\CE P/V!I\ING • 231 Sl1,LLS DECK PARKING SHOWN ON SHEET PO.O: Sf QUADRANT • 130 DECK PARKING STAlLS NE QUADRANT• J', Of.Cl! PARK!'IG STAllS TOTAL Of CK PARKING• l6~ STALLS RESTAURANT ,9.000 slJ REQUIRED PARIIING -36 RETAIL {20.225 ~fl REQlllRW PARKIN(;~ SI 692 RESIDENTIAL llNITS REQUIRED PARIIING ~ 1211 70TAL PARKING REQUIRED -1.32S STALLS TOT/IL Pl\R~ING SflCJWN n 1 366 STAlLS LEGEND . ·--·-·-····-····--·-·······----·--· DUMPSTER; RECYCLE BIN UTILITY AND ELECTRtCAL SPACE EX!TSTAJR LOBBY AREA QUENDALL TERMINALS PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE RENTON, WASHINGTON CENTURY PACIFIC, LLLP EXHIBIT 8 (_/) .I <r:: 7 2 er: w 1--- •"I .... J <( D z w ) 0 P1 .C le_ i ti ¥~ '• LEGEND OHWM 50' WETLAND SETBACK 100' OHWN SETBACI'. WETLAND EDGE -, _/ -, i. ~i ~0- i. ·~ ~ .,.1' '!; % s,or"•" "'STI"G--~ l.4,t,e W4SH;1\1Grol\l 'r I ~i ~.~::.: ::~:.:;:,::ARY I ' '. ,, :} '1 -I =:E '-. . L. ~ ' _'" . ''"" = . 11, 1 .. C =+ ~k . '! I t-. !=_I, ·-r--c -_-=_ 1 : ~ ,, . I i : '"n .. :r{·i·rl ::::::~-. /' -. :cl -• ' 'I[, ,I ' . -JJ --,,=-;:r;f / -~, ·.: /:·~: ______ ,_ . ifft-'.. -' ~-:----, <,--,.o.,._.'c______ -. ,____ ' -. .~:-="'" . =-, --.-.""''""'". ,! e'Br<Clfflf" ,/ - SW QUADRANT• 347 PARKING STAU..5 NW QUADRANT• 95 PARKING STALLS SE QUADRANT• 31.8 PARKING STALLS NE QUADRANT• 206 PARKING STALLS TOTAL P-1 PARKING• 966 STALLS SURFACE PARKING: SW QUADRANT• 161SURFACE PARKING STALLS SE QUADRANT• 42 SURFACE PARKING STALLS NW QUADRANT_• 38 SU Rf ACE PARKING STALLS TOTAL SURFACE PARKING • 2:31.STAU.S DECK PARKING SHOWN ON SHEET P0.0: SE QUADRANT• 130 DECK PARKING STALLS NE QUADRANT• 39 DECK P~KING STALLS TOTAL DECK PARKING• 169 STALLS RESTAURANT (9,000 sf) REQUIRED PARKING• 36 RETAIL (20,225 •I) REQUIRED PARKING• 81 692 RESIDEITTIAL UNITS REQUIRED PARKING• 1,211 TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED• 1,328 STALLS TOTAL PARKIN(; SHOWN• 1,366 STALLS LEGEND ~DUMPSTER/ RECYCLE BIN U. UTILITY AND ELECTRICAL SPACE ~ EXITSTAIR ~ LOBBYAREA ~ "'"'" {/. ,,msc~; lAk '6 1 - ~r ro ( ",,, ...... Iv BL Vo 't ,,~ / ---"_RC.°CS"" WNE: LOO o _ "i0,725s' \ "'\ { ·,s;,-Q,i'lif;~----------' ·c:-~ « oJ, ~ ,a(>PI:«"" ,.,~1 --~J~--- QUENDALL TERMINALS -PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE RENTON, WASHINGTON CENTURY PACIFIC, LLLP (fl _J <t z 2z ~ 0 _j o::: G _J w~ 0 r-~ b <,:: <l __J --'.)_ __J 6 ~ <:.( I-=i z ~ 0 IL 2 z w :::) 0 ' ~· -<, ~ w u ' " . : o'_ P1 .0 ' ' ' 9 I ///------------------- / BUILDING COVER TOTAL AREA= 167,350sf.....___ ---._ --------- // CO"J'sTYARO TOTAL AREA = ~17,60Ds1 --......____ ,,,.-SURFACE PKG AREA = 69,000sf ----.__ / ON DECK P'<G AREA = 59,000sf -------._ ----._ // 0, OCC< CS "" • ,S,COOs' _____ 1 / STREETS 'A', 8' k 'C' AR'::A = 'l9,2C,O,I //,,,./,,,. ~~;;:~~ ~Tir-1i~c::~'\;~:o:B~~~.338sl ' < LOT 7 SATELLITE PROPERTY = 50,725sf \v----------UNPAV£D C,RE '-''° & PED WA" AREA • '9.S70sf ·~~ . ,) 0 ~S!l!lACf< ~ ~-l STREETS 'J' &: '[' AREA = 23,522s! STREET LEVEL LANDSCAPE AREA 15,300sf OTHER LANDSCAPE AREA = 33,495sf TOTAL SITE AREA TO HIGH WATER LINE • 925,J76sf ~~-- I " i ' J!l ! ! ! I ~ j ! ! ' ! i i i ! i , 1 ' I , I ! I I ' -' -/, ·s· & 'c' -S<:l.25Gs' __L H ~ f i , ! ! , I ! ' i , ! ! i l " i , i ' I ~ ,_, ! ,o• Cl<W 5'::TUACI< ,m OI'"" s,-,,•c• ' I I Sl~EU 'iJ..' /\RU,~ ~G.OOOsf I I ! 'l u~ i:::::- EXHIBIT 9 ------------ O\J DECt< LS AREA = 25,000sr ---- LOT 7 50.725sf L I I I : U) _J <t z ~ -z ·-' 2 0 _J -~ 0::: 0 . zu WIG: f---~1 G " " " ~ _I z· >- _JO 5 <tr r z z 0 ~ ts z w =:, 0 < i:'I P2.0 < QUENDALL TERMINALS -PREFERRED ALTERNATE [l\t<:rior D.,,;ign Goals: •,1, ,,., .,., "' 'l'--IIDl'-JC, ~.1.\i RENTON, WASHINGTON CENTURY PACIFIC, LP ri,1,,.1.,·.~lk,t.,.o,.,e,Sraceh.,!o"" . ' "·"-i' ,1 ... ,I !'· B;;IUYNC; NW 1 11,-, ,1»,•1,,,1 ,,_, )''S f~.,•c;"\"' JI:,·,, \ltlss • r·. ' ' B,,;1~irigs Fxl~rtOE ;,,;,!<,~ "'"'" PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION FROM LAKE WASHINGTON ------------------------·------------------------------1 ' :;::.,: _ .. -,u ::kc:t;\-J '"''"~=1 · ' t''',~~,,,,. ' :;~2~~jl~~~~~~;):~ 3:241 ii; -------------------------------------------------------J illll!_ :H';<~, N',V :'. f\lJ;l,1.)1:-,(,; N'./J 1 F'<,'L<l Hf,e•1:,,, ~ •:u-~ ';;:::.:;.i~W'#;, - ~~}~;[~~::~' :i;.~ f5 J:,~ -c~1I~~~.~ !'OCll.DhC) S)h' · !':Ult i)iM~ <:,"ii/ \<U I l''.'!\;(0 S•N ! OVERALL WEST ELEVATION FROM LAKE WASHINGTON EXHIBIT 10 ===- fli.:1• f"l".JC, '::,·/,; 1 ~ <( z ::E a:: UJ 1- ..J ..J <( 0 z UJ :;;i O' P3.0 QUENDALL TERMINALS -PREFERRED ALTERNATE ~xtcrior Ocsiyn Goals BUil. :Jl'.\J(; \l\-V 1 '" RENTON, WASHINGTON CENTURY PACIFIC, LP Re,,, I·'"'' RcSl>Hr,or, 5P·"·"' / ''""" • · ,•in PARTIAL SOUTH ELEVATION F-gi'"IA' f, '•;!-r------••••••••••••••••·--------------------------------~ -··-·"··-·- tt::tt p,;--r, r--:--rt-. ! ":'-101 __ ~:r:=-~-;'. ... E(-:t h ,r'·~ .. \ ~-------------------------------------------------------~ 8Ull.JI\JG 'N'i 1 Run.o,~.:::; NE 1 SOUTH ELEVATION .,,,,;-;, n•"'' nw,,, r,,at.w; ,,,,,,.~.,, .,,I Buildings.· Exterior F•nish: r,,-,c,,ph"" r-·,,:.,,,;n .. ,,,. .·:,, ~, ' & ,. ' ' ''I ",--,-i,1 -:Ji: ;J}J~ •'"'''";::_;""'" "'"'\_"_·-·« .... " !:'::·-.... :·· -rn :E1 '·,,,_~\) ' i ·--'=- ~ <! z ~ c:: lJ.J 1- ...1 ...I <! Cl z lJ.J ::) O' P3.1 ·A ,• fclft > r ·,~,., . .: : ',l _i:__;___i__ L'!'(L: '"" -o:c:; '•-'''' •n l-',-0•' '"'-~ C:C:.f'.~'. .• , ... -~-, •. , ... , ,.,,.~":T" ·o:c -·o;::,;:::::-;-;-· '"(_,_:· ':.'..'.,.' , .... __ ,,.., "'•C'-"f-".~~'.\'::\'"'~'f,;~, :\ '" :;~·;, , ,. -·'·-· _ C a< a ,, .• _1·,:c_ ,_r;,r"A~c·n•c '."• ·~ "">'" ,·,-,,;c ·ccwl-e,, Oo,>'c,•0-0,00 ~-~ ,•co"'",,.,.,., ,~,,,.,,,.., -~, e .,,_ (Oi ~0-..,. -~~=, -··----,-:-;-~ _ """"' ""•' _,,,N,,~; oo'oa ~··-' .,_,,·,L_..'._•.'\t''·~~·"~ .,,_ ~~ " ..,..,, ", ';, ~- 9, "!, '\ > c:·· '4,-,-W-4.< i'f1NGr0J\I 9-: \ ~ / \ I ..,..,, '9, @ ,:'.!;· ?~ ?,:;. ,;,)"''~ o? "'~ "Z i Q),t'.. ~ ,,.. (Q ~ '> ~0- 0 ---cl I ; ·-.,"'.",.,,_,,.rd-~--I ' I '.t' ·1,r·' ,_', I ' I !/ I J -I_.. --,, ; -. ··1 l ... ::,Lil ··t ·,_ ~ . ' . • . C ·. • "'"''', I ,.;, ' Q ·! -·~,;~------ s '"'''"' "(I< S Cll'>.W<IS ·.C"- --------- ( '· i, T: __ ~:::L~n~·2\ !'"--c-~ nrL_J y·-· l ( ):,,. ] ' l.·a,pl 'J~ QUENDALL TERMINALS -PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE RENTON, WASHINGTON CENTURY PACIFIC, LLLP EXHIBIT 11 ;'.c]j}• _J [_'._ I ~°' ' ~ I ,,-, '-' .,: ,, " -. ~ 1_:_j c:;::, l •• 1_J ~I -I f l l 1 ! I j ' I ' , ~· 1 ' • \ " <-~ ~\ OARflCT MU f~ffiY 11 ,-W!GINIA MASON ATIUIIC CfJHUl '.U\IO'.!l'lll'I /' ,~I -,______::.__i_ -' • ~~1r--.1 sw:fls~ : <Ji 1:1 "\----vl hl0%~~-~~:·."' ' -· l :;\~"_tr··-~~; ~ .. ,, i M TIIRI.H'JJRS IM.£1 /.---_ -. AT Ul'll·POO<T! (1¥1') ~ --------~~ ------------------"~•~-~ j'-c"_:;2\; -,=;;)<i"~-r,? ~ c-_~"j•;,;,-~-'C~ {)_';,Q-~-, _ ~.· ........•... ~S~'!!_GioN·aL~-, . ,_--. -1- ! ----...:..._. _'. ___ , re ·---"- NOTES; ENl'IROH~ENTAL ROIEDl~TICfl 00 l!ITIUTlOH Cl" THE PRCffJffl' il!ll BE ~DUCTED PlllOR TO DE\HJJ1UENJ. !ll: ENW!t'.nl[NTl.l P~Olfe'.ION AG£NCY (EPA) IS THI: l.E.l.ll AGE',CY FO, All SITT RE.cDIA~ '.ND l,IITIGATION AC110HS ""ICH AA£ 10 BE P[ll!'CIIMED Al THE OUEHDA!.l TERMINI.LS 511£ UND£R SIJP[llf\/ND. 1 A[J(Nll(lNI.L IJ.Jl\l)ING ROil-QAAIN CONNECTIO!<S '.ND Plf'ING MAY BE Rfl:URED l. rJ)JBlE UTIUT! CONl[CTIOHS o,j/J.l B[ US([] 8CJ'll(l'i STRUCTUR(D BULDINGS ANO CNSTR\ICT,.'l>ul "llT I.RIA.~ 10 UIIIMl7F TIF RI~ IJ' l).WAGf TO ununs OOE TO DlffiRENTIM_ SE111..EM£111 ~ OCSIIHDBY ~ WlJ CHEO<ED llY .lPPRO\Ul BY l---+----1--+--+--+-------------+-'"'""'-J o ... rr-~v .!.l.G£l!2. " OAIT c, CIIO. APPR ll[\'IS(D PER 1111):;~TIOH llEOOIREMENTS RE\/lS'ON NOV_!_6.~ JOO No. ·1500050 -~. -2'"· Clll Tl) RlS amllFOl[rooii; l·IJH11:S5l5_ SCALE: AS NOTED lq,ff ...__ EXHIBIT 12 ,..,,~·~··''"''""' -·~.WAs,$10! -m= -.. ........... ~4~ ,, " NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OUEHDALL TERWIHALS 4350 WI W.ISMNGTON IIOUl!YARO, RENTOtl, WASIKTUN LAND US[, SHORELINE & MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION CONCEPTUAL STORM DRAINAGE AND GRADING PLAN S~EET C300 , ' ! l j 1 ! I I j j ~ -----------.. -----.. ---------·-··~ -, " LAKE WASHINGTON rnDINIJH Hl(Jj WAlfR Mo.RK {[)i\\M) [U:V,,18.61 ,--:-0· OHW SE:l!ll,(;!( •"·e ,o: Non 1 &: 2 \ (Ji'l'EIITIR(SHOliel.J~-\ Ollf/J.l 111TH \ ',,, \ / EN!:RCl' lliSSIPATION \ 's, \_ •,.-----'...__ / " . '\ _X . . ·. . . / OUil'l•U llllH ·· ------..__ _ ~ · . -. , rnrnc, ,,,.., 00 ·" 100" OHl'il,I S!:T'oACl\ \ . ' "--.:.._-.;'.._ -, .. ' / ll ____ ~;r;~ '• '(',t \ j --~ ac..:::_ __ -:-P:~"P...... · c 1 1 I f"::-.-.,,· \ ' L_____:;, \ \\\ ~ ;\V "-.'"'~l -~~~7 l. / ' ,, ' ' \/) \ \ . d./ • ~ . / ,.\\. -. d,,t \. 1 ·1 :;~:;, · ' \\··· /')~··.. n · .. ·-·--c '~ \:-1 ~ \_,:::;i ·. i;.. t------::-= "' ' /) ' ' '"'"'" ""'"'"' ""_! \\\ ~~~ · .. ·~~ -' NOTES: SN~W;ME'/T'l R(M[f!HON Ar./() MlnGATICt< Cf 1\£ P'<OP[lH'!' IIIU 0[ :IRMJCT[I) PRlffi TO DEl'l:U:WEIT THE [N\1RQNMENTAL PROl[CTION AGfNCY (EPA) IS Tl<[ LEAD AGENCY f(J! 1,JJ Sll'E P.£1,imlATION AND WTIG/1101 ACTl005 11\l"(li ARF. 10 BE PERFOli~ AT nu: Qll!'ND/J.l llR~INALS 9lf LINDEil SUf'ERFl.lND 2 THE PRW::CT SIT£ INQUD[S \f'P!,'{)Xl!AlUY 1,583 ra1 Cf ':J.'Olitll~ /.lONG LAS[ 11'!.SIINOTC'/ A 100 FOOT \IIICITH RIPAAIAN S(T8A{l( (ME/101.Hffi F'Rl),j ii[ ~~AA"!' H~ IIATtR MI.RK) AND PAf!AllELS ALONC H SHOliEUN£ A 9-10R£l1Nt R[SJORAT>Cfl PIJ\N IS 8EINC DE5JC11EI) AND Af'·'RO'IED LINDER EP~ 01REnCN 1 EXISl'NG li{fl/lNDS SND CCflCU-'IUIJ.. 111!-TLMID CREJ.llONj'ii!:STOOATION AREAS SHOMI HA\o\ NOT R[CEII'[[] Flll>L [OS C<!:SICN o.PF'llO'//,J_ /IJJO<TIONl<I. B','ILONC ROO' DP/JN O)NN(CTIDNS I.NlJ FflN~ !IAY E'i Rf(lUI~[~ 5 1 lfXffilf UTillTY CDNNECTICflS SH/IU BE USU! OCOON STTl\JClUR,D ~UILilMS AND UMSTPIJCTIJRED 5JIE /Jl[AS ID ~N1t,11l£ THE RISI( Cf D•UAV. 10 UHIITT DIJE TD f!ll1RlNTIA._ S1:1TlfM£Nl ---' t-- c__ . -+ '.,;;..'\:/{: =-> > rr----~~--~~.-, -________.......----~ I • l~-i -"f . 1EGEN_D~'--------- =:J DIST>NC IOUND ('.>:( NOTE 3) CDNCEPlU'l '11(11),N~ CRfATIOl/1,cSJOO/l[)()N (SIT ~On: .l) ---~-------1JtiR•1:Agr oc~~ Bf reiit~ a_r ITT~~ srj 00 1W 1131[§ D15 IUOII lOO Dt 1-l»·lll-~~ lq,ff "' 1?1.I0/15 O<IT ~~~~~~~~~".~~·-"DA~ --+--<--'-~--.. -.. -.... -=.====~--! NOV 16, 200~ f<','11,U, l't~ "1l11,11TIOO REOOIREM[NTS "' ;::,m Af'f'R. l RE\/1SION JO 8 No ·1.~000~0 S C /I L E AS NOTLO :!';/,!'.'::.;%,''"''"" ..... ,,,..,, -, .... ...., ~1_ '\ 'f I ~·"'--·-...~ ' l ,,---·---sroo~rurn v~uLT f."', . OUTHLL llllH--,_ .1. i" / i , · · ' ruERGY C'S'lPHOO ._ --,<r-PRE'.lcl"l,ING VAULT 1 • -~~ "· "-----. . _\-----/ A--~--':s, .....____ \ '. -=~~-"----~~ ............... ·,,'-.,__ :·· ~~--. ''(' : ,: ~~-. 0-, ____ -' h--i- ' 71..:.: ___ -~-----7 ----~ ~-~'.::~--- / ---.:_ PR[SfIT..flG VMJI.T- RESID£N11Al lfGI:i:fil I (·1 'I I; _ __:-1:- -t,· I~ , li", dl ' , I ~:111'.l ~1- l!1 '1 I ,1' ,.,,cl/"' L..:_20 • • NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION QUENDALl TERMINALS .mo I.AKE WASHINGTON BOUlEYARD, RENTON, W~INGTON I LAND USE, SHORELINE & MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION CONCEPTUAL STORM DRAINAGE AND GRADING PLAN SHFET C301 r ! 1 ~ l l I I I l ! ' ' ~ "° ~- 11/~Q/15 om ,, mo APPR . ' / r ,- SIOCW.IL'\/ ~. --~ s / • / / !! ~- a/ ~ i>-: Rl:\/ISUI Pl~ MITIGATll'.ll RHll'l<fMENTS RE\IISION " !! ~ C I "t ,,. " ~~2'~---... " SIOCVl'/.Ji';/ •• --··r" r o· "'' Sl[(W~L,:/ ' ' LIJiOSCI.PE LANOSCll!'f \j I I MATO! fl " I /.,,----4-6" OJRS (frl') 1"2~ n ~IJll['S ' n - '/ '· ' STREET A TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION ~ SC.Oil: 1· ~ 4' \J )f i !! - ,s' rn " ROIi I ,,. " ,S' I • SO(IIAl)(t\.lJiDSCAP( -~--PARP\ING--r--•• I ,M PARKIN~ OR SOEW.OU ·-<;OEW.IJ.J(/LANl)';CAPE ____ 'i I I= ' ; ,,,--4----6' ems (Tl'P) : GC I ~ l-2~ i / --12% J ,n ,_,, i " n --,-----. ........ ,. ~l.l.K EXTENDS 10 '!OADW•Y EDGE MiER£ NO !)I-STREET STREET 8 TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION fB\ PAAKING, SU Pi.JN (frl') SOU: I"~ f \J !! 60' I !! • 11' S{O'OJJ( ,-,1f:<)'tl I ,, ,, II' SlUl"-'C I i P/ftllNG ! W< = ' PARl(IN~ ' e/ I ~ /i t /4-6'1'.lJlO(frl') " ,_,, I/ i-~ ,_,, ,-n • ----" n -----:;:- " --~ocwm (XTENOS JO ~DADW~Y EDGE MiER£ NO ~-STRUT STREET C TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION CD P~RKI~ SH P'JN (rYI') SC1.l£ 1" ~ f EXHIBIT 13 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ORA'*"! SY OCSlWOfll Clll 00 ffl~ QUENDALL TERMINALS SHEET "' ----"'"--l~f. CHECHll 81 I.PPR()\{[) BY ~MF!!£ YOO rt 1¢ ,.,.,,_,, ,.,_ •'· "350 \AKE Wo\SHINGTON IIOIA[Vo\RD, RENTON, WASHINGTttt WTJ MA\/ 1-11-m-5555 ""'"""''""""' o,~ --,..~' ·-,, ,, LAND USE, SHORELINE & MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION C302 NOV 16, 2009 ----- S C A L L ~i"",.< ROADWAY SECTIONS JOB No :1=050 AS NOTED .. ~ ..... ~ ' ' ' ' l ! l l I I i, ] ~ ' C ~ ~ f--- "'' - - 11,1!1'15 RE'~SE[I PER MIJl!".J, 001 RWJ'REl,,lNTS TlATE ,. '"' APPR REl,'ISION < l ' ' I / ~l-(l1[X / ~ s ,o· a. t--Sl[J(Wocl(/ L/.IIDSCWi: t1V ~ ~ - . DRA\111 81 OCSlcNED s, rJ!l 1111 BU!llS TAD WTJ _ CHECKED BY IJ'f'l!OIID Br O!Hfll[ 1000.: WTJ MAY --,m---1-800-111-1~1 NOV 16. 20()9 S C A L E JO R No. :15000S0 AS NOTED ~·~~ ,I I " !-~ .. I L}~t C;,NDSCIJ'E 1:1 t-~ .. V~lilE_S I/ /-,·rues (rn•~ J ~ _ .. _,,iii!£,,!@{} = lkam m. ™™ STREET D -TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE SECTION/o\ SC•H· I" m 4 \J " ~ C _____1AAIESl76'-41~ VI.R(~5.6"-J l ,:~, c::;, I !AHOSCAPE I ' ' r6"DJ!l!l(m) I I I / n ~ VI.RIES ' .. ~-'·-""" -~ STREET E -TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE SECTIDNfE\ $CAL!; I' -4' \,_/ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION QUENDALL TERMINALS SHEET ,~· lq,ff '""'"-"'~"-. 4550 LI.KE WASHffiT'!'4 IIOIJL£V~D, IIDITCtl. W-'SHINGTOH "'"'"·"""" '°""'·'·" ~,,. LAND USE, SHORELINE & MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION C303 ___ .,,.. ..... '~;~ ROADWAY SECTIONS _,,. ; ! 1 ' l I t I l ! ' ' ~i 1; WATER NOTES: 8a.RBEE \Ill_ fN'!RY IJ.1 NTII 1,ln Rfl fir.A TfD 8Rf HlOO,i.NTS Sl1All llf Pm COO STANDARD PUN 8102. IJ.J. PROPOS[D '111.TER MI.IIIS ARE lOUl(O WllHIN lHE 320 ri::ESSURE IIN: flDJBI.I UlUTY COONECTIONS SHIJ.L BE usro BEM:EN STR1.ICT1MD OOILOOGS Mill ltlSJIIIJCTIJ!ffi ~TE AFl(AS m MINll,lllI \I£ RI~ (I r.1.11A~ ro UTILITIES ru: TO DITTERE>rnl.l. smu~rn1 i~ -. ± -_, c:'::::l --'- 1 ri ~ = •v_ Rl'.L~TE E):1ST i., TllJ~; . '; (UICCf.SlFlcET ~\'e'-- LEGEND: ____ _ IIEClf.lHICM..SERVICEIIOOII ~ ,oo.lPRV.t.Cl!JIM11Jffl'8A • nRt OOCVA 0 1.0XtSS 0000 FRC.. O\JTSlDE ,roe 1)1 ~llDINC FACE • ml[ H\'DRffll '"' fllANl)ll~ UIUN DUCT BAI+: (Cl'.-.i~. GAS, PO'lifR) (ff='l2}[ FlNl'.l-Ul FlOOR illVATION I I 1-1 I I Mz,:E:, t.lll llll llSH~ DIHIIIIYOO~ l-!Hl-5555 " 11&J25 om " CHO. APPR RE\11~ PER Ml~Tictl REOUIREl,IENlS RE\11SION NOV 16, 2009 JOB Ho.c15()Q050 S C A L E AS NOTED Rtl.-OCATE EX !11 TO (01;1: Ill:. N( .. CUR!! !T'rP) kpff \ ·-ntF·lt(.tl() -~SSSl!llflOIIEi' "'"~'"'"""··'"'·'""" ,.,.,,._,, ... ,o, .......... , ............. -. EXHIBIT 14 ~·,.-... jli9o2 9' tX· 12" II SiAll 8[ Al l[AST 4' 1IN()[R FIHrsHEll CR..OC OF f'R(II RO.IO\fAY ffi 9:_IJ.J. SI: ~~ 1i:t ~~~[)[ ~·,Q'_CO\fR_ QU[NDALl TERMINALS ~ I.AK[ WASIKJON BOULEVARD, RDmlll, WASHINGJON r-· --- I I/ I ,/ D:lST I(' M[RCl:R l\lANO M[TRO '.iflflfR ~ r-,1RG1NIA MASON / AlHITTIC CfNTTR / SER\KE DR I ' ,s..... ( ~ =-=:==i-,- 0: ..8AXltR st\11:R -' LIFT STATION lf'i~f\lE'==--~: /,/~ 1 ""' -<Oft. s NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET LAND USE, SHORELINE & MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION CONCEPTUAL UTILITY PLAN C400 ; I I ' • I ~a • i~ ' ~~ .. ~3 -":!~ i ,; z 0 C u, !" u, i o= 0 = ~ c,~ oC • zZ C, ~ 1~ c;J "" -)i,a C,:: )> )> ~> ,-u, 1it c- ::::!~ ~:;! c.,, -" ::;! ,; ~~ .,, z j [n ,; .,, I z~ = a: =; )> .,, z .,, 0 C -! C, ; ~ -' 0 ! 0 = z ~ & n 0 a z u, -' n = ,, C -J>. a n -C, 0 z I 8 ~ z S' s•• "U §'', a a , ' 8 l " • \ ,. \ ( \ L ' ' ~ I ' / ' I \ I ' ' ,1--·.··· . ' • / i ) ,-----;;=-,z-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-;c.;;;;c;cc;;:-;c-:-::-:--~ 2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 707 SeaWe, WA98121 Te~phone: (206) 452-5350 Fax: (206) 443-7646 www.eaest.com EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC January 12, 2016 Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development, Planning Division 1055 S Grady Way Renton,WA 98057 RE: Quendall Terminal EIS Appeal Dear Vanessa: Per your request, EA has prepared the following summary of the opportunities that the City of Renton provided for involvement by the general public and U.S. EPA in the SEPA process for the Quendall Terminals project. The attached table summarizes the public's and EPA's involvement in the SEPA process, including the following information: • Step in SEPA Process: e.g., DEIS, EIS Addendum, FEIS and EIS Appeal; • Required: whether or not the step is required by SEPA; • Provided: whether or not the step was provided for the Quendall Terminals EIS; • Date(sl: the dates on which the step was accomplished for the Quendall Terminals EIS; • Duration: the duration of the step for the Quendall Terminals EIS, including whether it was extended beyond the duration required by SEPA; and • Comments: comments on public/EPA involvement (e.g., the number of comment letters and emails received on the Quendall Terminals EIS Scoping, DEIS and EIS Addendum, and the way in which EPA's comments were incorporated into the EIS). As shown by the attached table, the City went above and beyond the SEPA requirements to involve the public in the Quendall Terminals EIS process, including: extending the EIS Public Scoping period (from the required 21 days to 70 days); holding a Public Scoping meeting to provide additional opportunity for public comment (which is not required); extending the DEIS public scoping period (from the required 30 days to 60 days); holding a DEIS public hearing to provide additional opportunity for public comment (which is not required); and taking and responding to public comments on the EIS Addendum (which is not required). The attached table also demonstrates that the City provided expanded opportunities for participation by EPA in the Quendall Terminals SEPA process and incorporated their input into the EIS, including: attending three meetings with EPA and the applicant to define the baseline assumptions for site cleanup/remediation that were used in the Draft EIS; and responding to EXHIBIT 15 1 comments in two letters from EPA on the DEIS that ultimately resulted in new baseline cleanup/remediation assumptions that were used in the EIS Addendum (e.g., a new Preferred Alternative with an expanded setback from the Lake Washington shoreline was developed and analyzed in the Addendum). Please let me know if you have any questions on this summary. Sincerely, Gretchen Brunner, Senior Planner EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. PBC 2 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Step In SEPA Process DEIS • EIS Public Scoping Period • Public Scoping Meeting • DEIS Public Comment Period • DEIS Public Hearing EIS Addendum • EIS Addendum Public Comment Period FEIS • FEIS EIS Appeal • EIS Public Appeal Period U.S. EPA INVOLVEMENT Step in SEPA Process DEIS • Pre-EIS Mtgs. Re Baseline Assumptions • Comment Letters on DEIS ' Per WAC 197-11-408(2)(i) 'Per WAC 197-11-455(6) QUENDALL TERMINALS EIS PUBLIC & U.S. EPA INVOLVEMENT Required Provided Date(s) Duration Yes (21 days 1 ) Yes 2/19/10 -4/30/10 70 days {extended) No Yes 4/27/10 1 day Yes (30 days2 ) Yes 12/10/10 -2/09/11 60 days {extended) No Yes 1/04/11 1 day No Yes 10/19/12-11/19/12 30 days Yes Yes 8/31/15 N/A Yes (20 days4 ) Yes 8/31/15-9/24/15 20 days Required Provided Dat_,,_(s) Duration No Yes 3/1/10, 4/22/10, 5/12/10 1 day each No Yes 1/13/11, 3/12/12 N/A 3 Taking and responding to comments on an EIS Addendum is not required by SEPA. 'Per RMC 4-8-110E.1.b Comments 5 letters/emails 4 commentators 75 letters/emails 8 commentators 12 letters -Responded to comments on DEIS and on EIS Addendum' 1 appellant Comments -Baseline assumptions used in DEIS were based on input from EPA at Pre- EIS meetings -Baseline assumptions used in EIS Addendum were modified based on comments on DEIS in EPA's 3/12/12 letter' 5 In their 3/12/12 letter, U.S. EPA indicated that the environmental baseline (post-remediation conditions) assumptions represented in the DEIS are reasonable given the expected general outcome of the Record of Decision (ROD), with an increase of the minimum shoreline setback area to 100 feet from the lake (Lake Washington) edge. The Preferred Alternative analyzed in the EIS Addendum incorporated EPA's recommended shoreline setback. 3 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUA09-151 ------Renton 0 Application Date: November 18, 2009 Name: Quendall Terminals PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Site Address: 4350 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 Version 1 I Engineering Review Comments Contact: Rohini Nair I 425-430-72981 mair@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: I have completed a preliminary review for the above referenced master site plan for the mixed use development which includes 692 residential units, 20,025 square feet of retail, and 9,000 square feet of restaurant. The following comments are based on the application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant. General utility comments 1. All buried utilities, public roads, and infrastructure serving the site development shall be placed in clean fill material (with the utilities in a trench with sufficient width and depth of 3 to 4 feet below the invert and adjacent to the utility), along with an acceptable barrier to prevent recontamination of the clean fill material, in order to protect the utility from contamination and to allow future maintenance of the road or utility lines. {Mitigation Measure C29). This mitigation measure is applicable for both public and private utility lines. 2. The required horizontal and vertical separations as per City of Renton standards should be provided between the utility lines. 3. If the required minimum separation between utility lines need wider pavement width, then the street width should be changed accordingly. 4. Any existing utilities under the proposed buildings will be required to be abandoned and removed, and the easements will be required to be relinquished or amended. 5. All mitigation measures of the Quendall Terminals Mitigation Document shall be applicable on the project and should be provided by the project. 6. An agreement with King county for access and frontage improvements over King County owned railroad right of way should be provided to the City prior to site plan review application and construction permit application. Water The water utility main lines for this project will be public water lines. Minimum 15 feet wide easement should be provide to the City of Renton for the public water main located in private streets. There is an existing 1 O inch diameter water main on the King County parcel fronting the site and an 8 inch water main extending into the Quendall Terminals site. 1. The conceptual utility civil plans submitted should be revised to include the following: ;·.1 Relocate about 870 feet of existing 12 inch water main along the property frontage to be within the new access road referred to as Street A. The existing water line cannot be accessible for repair and maintenance due to the location of the new road. Please see the attached water sketch. D Relocate the new 12 inch water main on the west side of the project to be within the paved 20 foot fire access road. The water main must be located at least 10 feet away from the building foundation and outside of the shoreline riparian area. To comply with these conditions, the buildings will need to be moved back further to the east to allow for the construction of the water main with the paved fire access road. D Complete the water main loop within the fire access road along the west side of the project from Street B to Street E. '.J Minimum 15 feet wide easement is required for water main. 2. All water mains and related appurtenances installed within the site shall be in accordance with the requirements of the EPA's approved plan for installation, operations, maintenance and monitoring plan of utilities. 3. Water mains shall be placed in clean fill materials, in a trench with sufficient width and depth of 3 to 4 feet below the invert of the water line, along with an acceptable barrier to prevent recontamination of the clean fill material, in order to protect the water mains from contamination and to allow future maintenance of the water mains by the City. 4. A utility easement and maintenance agreement with the city of Renton will be required for the maintenance and future repair of the water lines within the site. The property owners will be responsible for all costs related to the excavation, removal, and disposal of EXHIBIT 16 Ran: April 12, 2016 Page 1 of 8 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUA09-151 ------Renton®; PLAN • Planning Review • Land Use Version 1 Engineering Review Comments Contact: Rohini Nair 1425-430-72981 mair@rentonwa.gov materials and for final restoration associated with the City's operation, maintenance and repair of the water lines within the site. 5. Civil plans for the water main improvements that are submitted with the utility constn.iction permit should be prepared by a professional engineer registered in the State of Washington. Please refer to City of Renton General Design and Construction Standards for Water Main Extensions as shown in Appendix J of the City's 2012 Water System Plan. 6. Payment of system development charge fee and permit fee will be required at the time of issuance of the utility construction permit. Fees that are current at the time of issuance of the utility construction permit will be applicable on the project. Sanitary Sewer The sewer utility main lines for this project will be public sewer lines. Minimum 15 feet wide easement should be provide to the City of Renton for the public sewer main located in private streets. There is a 12 inch sewer main extending near the east property line of the Quendall Terminals parcel. 1. The sewer report mentions that the sewer system was designed to convey the peak flows by gravity to the project discharge location at a new manhole installed on an existing 12w diameter City of Renton sewer pipe. 2. Along with the utility construction permit plans, the developer is required to submit a revised sewer report that will reevaluate the existing Baxter lift station. The lift station capacity will need to be increased to serve the needs of the Quendall Terminals project. The sewer report submitted with the land use application showed an allowance of 1,100 gallons /acre/day for infiltration and inflow. The allowance number should be increased to 1,500 gallons/ acre/day. 3. Sewer manhole should be located outside of the landscaped center island on Street B. 4. Any use in the buildings (kitchen, restaurant. etc. ) involving the handling of grease requires installation of a properly sized grease interceptor. 5. If the project proposes an indoor pool; the pool wilt need to be connected to the sanitary sewer system. 6. Storm drainage system within the indoor parking area shall be connected to an oil water separator and directed to the sewer system. 7. All buildings should be served by individual side sewers at a minimum. 8. Payment of system development charge fee and permit fee will be required at the time of issuance of the utility construction permit. Fees that are current at the time of issuance of the utility construction permit will be applicable on the project. 9. The Baxter lift station sewer Special Assessment District (SAD) fee will be applicable on the project. The base rate of this SAD fee is $166,421 with an interest of 5.3%. The rate as March 22, 2016 is $225,408.35 and will increase daily. This SDA fee rate will max out in July 2019. The rate that ts current at the time of issuance of the utility construction permit will be applicable on the project. The payment will be due at the time of issuance of the utility construction permit. Storm water There is an existing 12 inch diameter stormwater line on North 42nd Place that ends near the west property line of the Quendall Terminals parcel. Since the internal streets of the development are private, the storm water system for the development will be private. A stormwater covenant for allowing the City access to inspect the stormwater facility and assigning maintenance responsibility of the BMPs to the property owners will need to be recorded. The developer/ property owners/ HOA will be responsible for the maintenance of all stormwater systems constructed by the project. 1. A drainage plan and drainage report (TIR) based on the City of Renton Amendments to the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual should be submitted with the utility construction permit . The site is located in the Flow control Duration standard forested site conditions. The applicant is proposing to use the direct discharge exemption for the project. Water quality treatment is proposed for the project and should follow the requirements of the City of Renton Amendments to the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual. Storm water flow control BMPs are lo be provided. All recommendations of the geotechnical report and the mitigation measures included in the final mitigation document should be followed in the design and construction of the project. 2. City of Renton has the Western Washington Phase II Municipal Starmwater permit. Per the requirements of the Phase II permit, all projects that have been approved prior to January 1 2017 and have not started construction by January 1, 2022 shall follow the new Surface Water Drainage Manual. Therefore, if the project has not started construction by January 1, 2022, the requirements of the Stormwater Manual that is current at that time will be applicable on the project. 3. The stormwater requirements (1 to10) included in the memorandum dated September 14, 2009 from Ronald Straka, Surface Water utility Supervisor, included below along with the additional information (a) and (b) are applicable on this project. The memorandum is Ran: April 12, 2016 Page 2 of ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUA09-151 ·----.,,,,.,,-,-,Renton PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Version 1 Engineering Review Comments Contact: Rohini Nair 1425-430-7298 I mair@rentonwa.gov also included as an attachment. a. Projects approved prior to January 1, 2017 and have not started construction by January 1 2022, shall be subject to the requirements of the new Storrnwater Manual that will be current at that time. b. Projects that comply with the exceptions included in Section 1.2.8 of the 2009 Surface Water Manual may provide basic water quality treatment instead of enhanced basic water quality treatment. 4. Payment of system development charge fee and permit fee will be required at the time of issuance of the utility construction permit. Fees that are current at the time of issuance of the utility construction permit will be applicable on the project. Transportation 1. Frontage improvements, including sidewalks, shall be provided along the west side of Lake Washington Boulevard and Ripley Lane N (Seahawks Way) along the site. These sidewalks shall connect to sidewalks to the north and south, which connect to other pedestrian facilities in the area. (Mitigation Measure G3.) 2. A crosswalk including pedestrian crossing warning signs at and in advance of the crosswalk shall be provided across Lake Washington Boulevard in order to connect the proposed development to the May Creek Trail on the east side of the Boulevard. The crosswalk shall be controlled by Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons, if the City determines that such lighting is warranted. (Mitigation Measure G9.) 3. A traffic mitigation/impact fee shall be determined and paid for the proposed development at the time of building permit issuance and in accordance with the City of Renton Municipal Code to help offset the impacts of the project on the City's roadways. (Mitigation Measure H 1.) 4. TDM measures shall be implemented to reduce the number of vehicle trips and thus provide some benefit to improving LOS and queuing impacts at study intersections. (Mitigation Measure_H2.) 5. Infrastructure improvements within the site shall include full curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and landscape strips (where applicable) as well as frontage improvements (curb, gutter, sidewalk, landscape strips, bike lanes, pavement width, and utilities) along the west side of Lake Washington Boulevard and Ripley Lane N in front of the project site. Provisions for safe pedestrian circulation shall encourage future transit usage to and from the site when planned public transit becomes available. (Mitigation Measure H3.) 6. If approved by EPA and any NRD settlement, a pedestrian trail shall be provided onsite through the minimum 100 foot shoreline setback area that shall be accessible to the public and shall connect to Lake Washington Boulevard through the internal site sidewalk system. If EPA's ROD or any NRD settlement prohibits the trail, the trail shall be relocated to the west side of the westernmost buildings onsite, and could be combined with the fire access road; this trail shall connect to Lake Washington Boulevard through the internal site sidewalk system. {Mitigation Measure H4.) 7. To mitigate traffic impacts to the Lake Washington Boulevard corridor south of the development. the applicant shall install traffic calming treatments on Lake Washington Boulevard south of N 41 st Street to encourage primary trips generated by the project to utilize the I 405 corridor. Although the City of Renton has no adopted residential traffic management program, arterial calming measures could include treatments that create either horizontal or vertical deflection for drivers. Such treatments could include, but not limited to chicanes, serpentine raised curb sections, raised median treatments, speed tables, and/or speed humps. Final design of traffic calming elements shall be approved by the City. (Mitigation Measure H5.) 8. The parking supply under the Preferred Alternative shall meet the minimum off street parking requirements of the City of Renton. (Mitigation Measure H6.) 9. Shared parking agreements between on site uses and implementation of TOM measures for proposed residential uses shall be implemented to reduce parking demand during peak periods, thereby reducing the necessary parking supply. (Mitigation Measure H7.) 10. A fire access road shall be provided to the west of the westernmost buildings onsite. The road shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide, and shall be constructed with crushed rock or grass crete to support the weight of fire apparatus, and shall be available for emergency vehicle access. If located in the minimum 100 foot shoreline setback area, and approved by the EPA ROD and any NRD settlement, the road shall also serve as a pedestrian trail. 1f EPA's ROD or any NRD settlement prohibit the fire access road within the minimum 100 foot shoreline setback area, the road shall be relocated to the west side of the westernmost buildings onsite, and could be combined with the trail. (Mitigation Measure H8.) 11. In order to promote a multimodal transportation network, redevelopment on the Quendall Tenninals site shall include site amenities (i.e., planting strips, street lighting, etc.) and access to future transit zones on Lake Washington Boulevard and at the 1405/NE 44th Street interchange to encourage and accommodate public transportation access in the future (future potential public transportation in the vicinity could include Bus Rapid Transit on I 405 planned by Sound Transit and Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) with a flyer stop at the I 405/NE 44th Street interchange). (Mitigation Measure H9.) 12. Staff recommends that a paved bicycle lane shall be provided along the east and west sides of Ripley Lane (Seahawks Way)/Lake Washington Boulevard from the end of the current bike trail along Ripley Lane to the intersection of Ripley Lane (Seahawks Way)/Lake Ran: April 12, 2016 Page 3 of 8 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUA09-151 ---,,,,.,,,..,....Ren ton 0 PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Version 1 Engineering Revievir Comments · Contact: Rohlni Nair 1425-430-7298 I mair@rentonwa.gm . Washington Boulevard (Mitigation Measure H10.) 13. The developer should coordinate with WSOOT, King County, and the City of Renton to finalize the required lane, signal, and frontage improvements on Lake Washington Blvd, Ripley Lane (Seahawks Way), and Barbee Mill access. This co ordination and finalization of the street improvements and ROW requirements should take place before the site plan and the building/utility permit application is submitted to the City of Renton. All the street improvements included in the EIS, E1S Addendum, FEIS, and the mitigation document, to address the impacts of the project should be provided. Please see the figure titled 'Additional lanes required to be provided to mitigate project Impacts' for information regarding the additional tum lanes and additional through motor vehicular traffic lanes on Lake Washington Blvd. Street improvements should be constructed by the developer. The required ROW dedications should be provided and or obtained by the developer. 14. Private access at the Barbee Mill Access Frontage improvements including landscaped planter and sidewalk matching the existing improvements on the west side of the access is required to be provided on the east side of the access. 15. Private access at the Ripley Lane (Seahawks Way) 8 feet wide landscaped planter and 5 feet wide sidewalk is required to be provided on either side of the access. 16. For the scenario with 1405 improvements: a. Lake Washington Blvd bin Barbee Mill Access (N 43rd Street) and Ripley Lane N (Seahawks Way). The eastbound and westbound thru lanes planned by WSDOT shall be extended beyond and thru the Barbee Mill access intersection. This shall result in 2 thru lanes in each direction on Lake Washington Blvd from the 1405 interchange past the Barbee Mill access (N 43rd Street). b. Barbee Mill access (N 43rd Street)/ Lake Washington Blvd. Traffic signal shall be installed at the intersection. At the Barbee Mill Access (N 43rd Street) /Lake Washington Blvd intersection, the EB approach shall be widened to include a separate LEFT TURN only lane. 17. For the scenario without 1405 improvements: a. Traffic Signals. Traffic signals shall be installed at the intersections of the I 405 northbound and southbound ramp intersections, as well as at the intersection of Barbee Mill Access (N 43rd Street)/Lake Washington Boulevard. The City will consider moving the location of this signal to the intersection at Ripley Lane/Lake Washington Boulevard as part of a future WSDOT improvement project to the NE 44th Street interchange. Relocating the traffic signal to Ripley Lane/Lake Washington Boulevard could reduce/eliminate potential longer range impacts of traffic queues on N 43rd Street between Lake Washington Boulevard and Road A, and with the existing rail crossing (should It be re activated for rail service or converted to a trail corridor). An engineering study will be completed at that time to support the determination of the location for the installation of the traffic signal at either N 43rd Street or Ripley Lane. (Mitigation Measure H 13.) b. Intersection #1 I 405 Northbound Ramps/NE 44th Street. The southbound and northbound approaches shall be widened so that a separate left tum lane and shared thru right tum lane is provided on both legs of the intersection. The final configuration of the intersection with the additional widening improvements shall be coordinated with WSDOT. (Mitigation Measure H14.) c. Mitigation measure H15 should be corrected to mention the widening on the eastbound approach on the Barbee Mill access instead of the previous typo that mentioned the westbound approach. [H15. Lake Washington Boulevard between Barbee Mill Access (N 43rd Street) and I 405 Southbound Ramps. Additional channelization improvements between the Barbee Mill access and the I 405 southbound ramps shall be constructed. Additional eastbound and westbound lanes shall be constructed to provide additional queue storage created by the traffic signals required at the southbound ramp and Barbee Mill Access (N 43rd Street) along Lake Washington Boulevard. At the Barbee Mill Access (N 43rd Street)/Lake Washington Boulevard intersection the eastbound approach on the Barbee Mill Access shall be widened to include a separate left tum only lane and the northbound approach on Lake Washington Boulevard shall be widened to include a separate left tum only lane. Ultimately, the City of Renton shall determine the best configuration for the improvements, given ongoing coordination with WSDOT on the adjacent interchange design, King County (owner of the vicinity rail right of way), and adjacent private development.] d. Lake Washington Boulevard between Barbee Mill Access (N 43rd Street) and I 405 Southbound Ramps. Additional channelization improvements between the Barbee Mill access and the I 405 southbound ramps shall be constructed. Additional eastbound and westbound lanes shall be constructed to provide additional queue storage created by the traffic signals required at the southbound ramp and Barbee Mill Access (N 43rd Street) along Lake Washington Boulevard. At the Barbee Mill Access (N 43rd Street)/Lake Washington Boulevard intersection the westbound approach on the Barbee Mill Access shall be widened to include a separate left turn only lane and the northbound approach on Lake Washington Boulevard shall be widened to include a separate left tum only lane. Ultimately, the City of Renton shall determine the best configuration for the improvements, given ongoing coordination with WSDOT on the adjacent interchange design, King County (owner of the vicinity rail right of way), and adjacent private development. (Mitigation Measure H15.) 18. All the mitigation measures of the Quendall Terminals Mitigation Document shall be applicable on the project and should be provided by the developer prior to temporary occupancy certificate is given for the first building in the site. 19. All the internal streets of Quendall Terminals site shall be private streets. 20. The proposed cross section of the internal streets should be revised as per the attached drawings and as per the description Ran: April 12, 2016 Page 4 of E ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUA09-151 ·---..,....,..,--R" en ton PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Version 1 I Engineering Review Comments Contact: Rohini Nair 1425-430-7298 I mair@rentonwa.gov included below. If the street pavement width is not sufficient to accommodate the utility lines with the required separation as per the City of Renton standards, then the street widths will have to be increased accordingly. a. Street A can have two cross sections depending on the use of the building on the side of the street. The cross section elements include i. Parking garage (residential use) near the street D 10 feet wide landscaping near the parking garage building o 12 feet wide sidewalk with tree grate ( 4'x8') :::J 0.5 feet wide curb D 6 feet wide on street parking on one side of the street o 20 feet wide paved travel way (2 10 feet wide lanes) c 0.5 feet wide curb LJ 1 O feet wide landscaping ii. No parking garage (retail use) near the street ::J 6 feet wide landscaping near the retail building :::J 12 feet wide sidewalk with tree grate ( 4'x8') o 0.5 feet wide curb c 6 feet wide on street parking on one side of the street c 20 feet wide paved travel way (2 10 feet wide lanes) C"J 0.5 feet wide curb o 10 feet wide landscaping An on site circulation study is required to be provided with the site plan to determine if the proposed 12 feet wide center tum lane is required. If the center tum lane is required, then the street width will have to changed accordingly. The width of landscaping near the property line is also subject to change based on the site circulation study and/or the proposed use of the building adjacent to Street A b. Street B can have three cross sections depending on the use of the building on the side of the street. The cross section elements include i. No parking garage on either side of street B (retail use on both sides) :::J 15 feet wide sidewalk with tree grate (4'x8'} o 0.5 feet wide curb n 8 feet wide on street parking on one side of the street c 24 feet wide paved travel way (2 12 feet wide lanes) o 8 feet wide on street parking on one side of the street D 0.5 feet wide curb 15 feet wide sidewalk with tree grate (4'x8') ii. Parking garage (residential use) on one side of Street 8 o 10 feet wide landscaping near the parking garage building o 15 feet wide sidewalk with tree grate (4'x8') c 0.5 feet wide curb [. 8 feet wide on street parking on one side of the street 11 24 feet wide paved travel way (2 12 feet wide lanes) J 8 feet wide on street parking on one side of the street :::J 0.5 feet wide curb u 15 feet wide sidewalk with tree grate (4'x8') iii. Parking garage (residential use) on both sides of Street B L 10 feet wide landscaping near the parking garage building o 15 feet wide sidewalk with tree grate (4'x8') J 0.5 feet wide curb 8 feet wide on street parking on one side of the street CJ 24 feet wide paved travel way (2 12 feet wide lanes) o 8 feet wide on street parking on one side of the street Ran: April 12, 2016 Page 5 of 8 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUA09-151 PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Engineering Review Comments D 0.5 feet wide curb D 15 feet wide sidewalk with tree grate (4"x8") o 10 feet wide landscaping near the parking garage building --------Renton Version 1 Contact: Rohini Nair 1425-430-72981 mair@rentonwa.gov c. Street C can have three cross sections depending on the use of the building on either sides of the street. The cross section elements include: Parking garage (residential use) on both sides of Street C D 10 feet wide landscaping near the parking garage D 6 feet wide sidewalk o 0.5 feet wide curb D 6 feet wide on street parking lane on one side o 20 feet wide paved travel way (2 10 feet wide lanes) D 6 feet wide on street parking lane on one side D 0.5 feet wide curb D 6 feet wide sidewalk D 10 feet wide landscaping near the parking garage ii Parking garage (residential use) on one side of Street C D 10 feet wide landscaping near the garage D 6 feet wide sidewalk on the side near the garage o 0.5 feet wide curb D 6 feet wide on street parking lane on one side D 20 feet wide paved travel way (2 10 feet wide lanes) o 6 feet wide on street parking lane on one side D 0.5 feet wide curb D 12 feet wide sidewalk on the side away from garage Cl 4 feet wide landscaping back of sidewalk on the side away from garage iii No parking garage on any side of the street (retail use on both sides) D 4 feet wide landscaping near the building n 12 feet wide sidewalk D 0.5 feet wide curb D 6 feet wide on street parking lane on one side lJ 20 feet wide paved travel way (2 10 feet wide lanes) D 6 feet wide on street parking lane on one side D 0.5 feet wide curb LJ 12 feet wide sidewalk D 4 feet wide landscaping back of sidewalk d. Street D cross section elements include: D 10 feet wide landscape setback D 0.5 feet wide curb lJ 20 feet wide paved travel way (2 10 feet wide lanes) D 0.5 feet wide curb n 6 feet wide sidewalk u 5 feet wide landscaping between back of sidewalk and parking lot e. Street E cross section elements include: rJ 10 feet wide landscaping on the side near the parking garage LJ 6 feet wide sidewalk D 0.5 feet wide curb D 20 feet wide paved travel way (2 1 O feet wide lanes) il 0.5 feet wide curb on the side near the property line Ran: April 12. 2016 Page 6 of.:.,, ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUA09-151 enton PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Version 1 I Engineering Review Comments Contact: Rohini Nair 1425-430-7298 I mair@rentonwa.gov J 5 feet landscape setback from property line If portions of Street E will have parking on both sides, then alternate street cross sections will be required for those portions of Street E. 21. If the required minimum separation between utility lines need wider pavement width, then the street width should be changed accordingly. 22. Street lighting is required to be provided on all streets. The street lighting can follow the City of Renton's residential street lighting requirements. Since the streets are private, the street lighting shall be privately owned and maintained by the developer/ property owner/ HOA. 23. Parking garage entrances should be designed with consideration of sight distance. 24. The proposed project has passed the City of Renton's traffic concurrency test. A traffic concurrency report has been provided for the project. 25. An easement with King county for access, and an agreement with King County for construction of frontage improvements over King County owned railroad right of way should be provided to the City prior to site plan review application and construction permit application. General Comments 1. All construction or service utility permits for drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. When utility plans are complete, please submit four (4) copies of the drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, permit application, an itemized cost of construction estimate, and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. 3. All electrical, phone, and cable services and lines serving the proposed development must be underground. The construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and aooroved by a Citv of Renton insoector prior to temonrarv certificate of occupancv. Community Services Review Comments Contact: Leslie Betlach 1425-43().6619 I LBetlach@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT COMMENTS (from Community Services) 1. As per the Final EIS (Aug. 2015) and the Mitigation document (Aug. 2015), the revised plan sheets do not reflect the crosswalk across Lake Washington Blvd. as per Mitigation G 9 Condition. 2. As per the final EIS (Aug. 2015) and the Mitigation Document (Aug. 2015), the revised plan sheets do not reflect the Trail connection within the 100' shoreline setback south to the Barbe Mill Development as oer G 11 Mitigation Condition. Planning Review Comments Contact: Vanessa Dolbee 1.425-430-73141 vdolbee@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: 1. RMC section 4 4 030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 2. Commercial, multi family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 4. A National Permit Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required when more than one acre is being cleared. 5. This permit is shall comply with the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. The permitted is responsible for adhering to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Bald Eagle Manaaement Guidelines (2007) and /or your U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service permit. Building Review • Planning Comments Contact: Craig Bumell I 425-430-7290 I cburnell@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: follow recommendations of the soils report Ran: April 12, 2016 Page7of8 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUA09-151 -------Renton® PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Version 1 Technical Services Comments Contact: Amanda Askren 1425-430-7369 I aaskren@rentonwa.go,• Recommendations: For the preliminary binding site plan review: Updated title report not provided. Submitted title report for May 2009. The dedication of land for street purposes on binding site plans requires approval by the City Council. Said dedication is achieved via a recorded City of Renton Dedication Deed document (form is provided by the city). If the dedication Is to be recorded with the binding site plan, the dedication process needs to be timed in such a way that Council approval and all other matters pertaining to the dedication have been addressed and resolved, and said document is ready to record. The Deed of Dedication document includes both a legal description exhibit and a map exhibit. The legal description exhibit should be prepared, stamped, dated and signed by the applicant's surveyor. The surveyor should also prepare the map exhibit. The dedication process requires an updated title report, to be dated within the 45 days prior to Council action on said dedication. Talk to the Project Manager if there are questions or further information is needed. Ran:April 12,2016 Page 8 of:-· ' ' ! J ! 1 l I I I ---\ \," __ -\l~( -~ ~· \ !~~~ \\ \\~)Til-1111 \ -' f.- "t- BAR8cE ~U ENTRY-...... ~ATER NOTES: All Nr ... AHJ R[lO.-:AnD FIRE" HYDf!ANTS Sl</.ll B£ O[R CC'l 'ilANDARD P"../IH B102 All PRllP05:.cl 11'P'[R WAINS AP.t lc'CAlED \MTHI~ THf J10 PR[S51J!l{ lrH FlDJUll VTILJTY CONHECMS 5Hl,ll IJl VSE'J ~-~ I ,~ EXm"w(:11a -~ f>RBW'l 20NE~ !lllf" l"""'li"="i"':':ii"'Yo ·rx PR~ w.o i'RE$$lll£ !ON[ -<'1._,V---~/- 'IO m-PRESSIJP.E-'l~:--_-~--/·+------g:5~:W · __ .,~~-w- LEGEND: WECWlNICAI.S£R"IICC~ \ii l_ REiOC:Al'E O:IST U,UTY • ct!!,Cf".-SlllITT ~ •c«.IPP.V,M(ilP./.ll[ll'.'f'DA ~ •FlRE oocv~ • AC((SS ~ Fl!Ct.l 00~1[1[ • 10C C!I llUILD<NG f~il: • F1RE ~'rcl'lANT L"Y~/ -l!EIOCAlt E~ 'tt TO EDG( Cf" NEW C'JRB l1'1'P) \,u12'·wfno MfS"i!JRE ZCtE) -~.J..-=---------'--- U• l~HN S1R'JC11JRl0 SU LOIN GS I.NO !NSTWC~,RIT ';AT[ M[A5 ru MINIMIZE 1)£ RISI( or Q/l.ljh(;[ 10 lill'JTI[S out TO DIFl'ER£NTI.\l SEIT.(MfHT '"" 11mc-:::ii:a Fl1ANCHISE UTUT'I DUCT Bm,; (COIA!, GAS, POIO) ---------"''"''" I ll/~0/15 en " CHO APl'R f~ ~l,!<;[lfl()OR[l.[VATION QijllflN HY ----ii£Sl(Nc0 BY ~WTJ ------------i~ ~PP110'IED 81 -~-+-wc'c'~ -OAl~AV RE\1SE0 l'(l': ~11-.:;U(N R<:WIRE~:il NCV 16, 2009 R[Vl$10N JOB ~o . !500C50 C.111 JIO 11/ll~ DIHIOil IOOIIG 1-&lJ-11rn; S C A L E AS NOTrn kpff '''""'·-·--'"'''""" >oml•."''"'""' ..... ,,,.,, ........... .,,... TX f2" 11 SHAIJ. Bl: ,1 U:AST 4 - DNDER F1N1;;>ED (Jl!,OC Of PRllP ROADWAY (1l m/J.L ilf tQIERE!l ll'fT s'1A TO PRO'.« 4"-a-COit~ TU 8 r---- ,-,F ~~[:!;SAND " MflllO SEWER HJ 11 IT~_ W!GIHIA MASOO AT•LETIC Cf'1'F~ / SES\\([ DR I r::-----...._ z___ 1", -----:::------... ' --1 _~,~ !-Ft~- ' ______ ..:_ __ l-_ ll.BAffiR 'ia\ER ' LIFT STATION 0150lims ---- ~ - ~/ • • , ~"' -,or. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION QUENDALL TERMINALS .u50 LI.KE Wo\SHll«lTON !K)Ul[V.+.RD, RENTON. WASJftMGTO!! LAND USE, SHORELINE & ~ASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION CONCEPTUAL UTILITY PLAN SHFFT C400 f • ~ f l I I ! l ! , ?, , ' ~-'--------:N .. ·.··. -.. ·-i~L.~. -~- . . ' . ' ._.. 't:i I I Jnrr1mTtt0 .. < C'." ~'.':'.' ,, ·1 .. -·~-, ' ' -, ' . . I IOOER ijAR!( (OHMI) \\ ·1j'f:t<l.~l;~~~s \g~[w] 1 --'• .,. --·· \ -. ' --' ' "'"'" -~· LAKE WASHINGTON \ • "'''" i -~~'"''"'!""!;,';.,,;;;=·~)--._ ', ... . -------- •--, I •-••,"'--,, -, ~-"-•• •• ' -. ', \, -·. \\ V ''-""'-·-·· --,, , , ---, ··~ ' ,-·=---:::. --,: -,' --. -',,_ ' ' ---100 lll\NSETBACK '1 _;;\ /,' [;;;'""':;',;',1\,;I',,uc" . c:>'"<--,;~· ~-FH{TYPJ~ ', ~ ---c:::-~ -~_,. ( I ".. -\ // ,.,, -~ ---~ ,..,::::~ ' ' ·1 ~ -' ' --,, --" ' -I y ;----,=-,-,,-, , ;, ~. --j· , /" ,,.------' 'I ----, ·1 ~ z; ~---'\ · -, : I n • / / ,c,__ ' ' . I -// o ><-' , " -" o: . -'o, --~ -,..,,-__.,;,--__ ' --~~ ' fLllf. '1, ---,,/' 'i"1i-,-------. ..., ...,,;.,. "'"' . r---=-1 _.. 'll) I / ,.-----____ >. \ L..l..J I [""-.. • (/(/ / /':)-.,,':)-.,,·/,' \ . ' ', , E -. -.. -/ \ / \ .. 'I'-- \ . \ . --- '--- \J • C_l WATER NOTES: AU. IO' AND RELOCA'IID FlRE H'rORANB SllAU. oc P[li W'1 smo1.m fVN BIOZ. AU. PRCFOSEll \IATffi M~S ARE LOCA'IED lllll-lN Tl1E J2C PRE~ ZOOE FLfXl(lf um1rr-COONfCllffiS Sl!AU. BE lf.lD OCJ11flN STRUCTIJIITTl 9JI\JJINCS NID IJNSTRUCTIJRm SITE AREAS TQ MJNlliZE lHE RISK (le DJ.YAG[ '0 UTUTIES 00[ 1D [llff[R[NTil.l S(Tll[M[NT LEGEND: ~[IWICA!. SlJMCE IIOOII: ~ o[lo),IPR\l',~TEl'!IINORP8A ~ ,All:'EOOC¥A •ACClSS!IOOl!FllCNllJT"lOC •fDClll6UJIDINGf~(l" ~ fR Hl'l)RANT '"' f'RANCHSE UnlTY DUCT So.NI( ((:(IN, GAS, P0110!) [f!:':~2] ~~l'.MD Flcal El£VATIOO I I I I I I 8€.;i~·~ SC 12/30/15 om "' (:ilO .o.rrR R(\IQD PER MITIGATilll REW!REM[NIS RE\ilSION NOii 16, 2009 JOB No.:1500050 RtSlD[tmAL 5 ; _ ~ RESIDENTIAL v -( a jfh45.~j ~ ~ IFF·~~.,1 ~ - Clll T!<J il!lll OIHftllYOO~ l·!lH11-5l55 SCALE· AS NOTED lcpff ,.,,,,., ....... _.., ... ,w, ,...,.,, ..... , .. ................ _ I { J lt~;~ i I ; ~ I r-li a1 ~I -._ R[S1ornTlAL _,, : ~ 1Pr~~ ~!-~ r (] . IFF~issj ; // • • • l od> = <Oft NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION QU[NDAll TERMINALS SHEET 4350 LAKE W~ BOIJL!YARD, RENTOK, WASl9fflON LAND US[, SHORELINE & MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION CONCEPTUAL UTILITY PLAN C401 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: September 14, 2009 TO: Arneta Henninger, Plan Reviewer FROM: )? ~ Ronald J. Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor QUENDALL TERMINALS STORMWATER REQUIREMENTS SUBJECT: Please see my comments below regarding the drainage report and plans, dated August 27, 2009, for Quendall Terminals. 1. The project shall be required to comply with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) standards as a condition of SEPA. 2. A compete TIR for the project site will be required with submittal of the civil engineering plans for the site that includes all information required by the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual. This includes information related to satisfying all core requirements and applicable special requirements in the 2009 KCSWDM. 3. The proposed projects must submit an offsite analysis report that assesses potential offsite drainage and water quality impacts associated with development of the project site and proposes appropriate mitigation of those impacts. 4. The report must include a KCRTS printout of all land use input values for pre-and post-developed impervious and pervious areas. The report should also include a basin summary table for the existing condition and developed condition land use. The basin summary table should identify the wetlands. 5. The wetland area needs to be included in the pre-and post-developed time series analysis. 6. Since the project will result in more than 5,000 square feet of new impervious surface, the project must comply with section 1.2.3 of the 2009 KCSWDM Flow Control. The direct discharge exemption may apply to the project if it meets all of the following criteria: a. The flowpath from the project site discharge point to the edge of the 100-year floodplain of the major receiving water will be no longer than a quarter mile. b. The conveyance system between the project site and the major receiving water will extend to the ordinary high water mark, and will be comprised Henninger/Quendall Terminal Stormwater Requirements Page2of2 September 14, 2009 of manmade conveyance elements (pipes, ditches, etc.) and will be within public right-of-way or a public or private drainage easement c. The conveyance system will have adequate capacity per Core Requirement #4, Conveyance System, for the entire contributing drainage area, assuming build-out conditions to current zoning for the equivalent area portion and existing conditions for the remaining area d, The conveyance system will be adequately stabilized to prevent erosion, assuming the same basin conditions as assumed in Criteria (c) above. NOTE: The major receiving waters do not include wetlands. 7, The engineer proposes to discharge runoff from the north and west portions of the site into the wetlands located at the north and west corners of the site. The engineer needs to conduct an analysis of the wetland to determine the existing hydrology, including the hydroperiod, and base the recharge on that analysis. Typically, the wetland report would include a recommendation from the biologist as to the proper recharge rate. 8. The proposed roadway improvements shall be taken into consideration when calculating the post development site condition and sizing the water quality and flow control facilities, if required. 9. The project will be required to provide enhanced water quality treatment per section 1.2.8.1. Application of the Enhanced Basic Water Quality menu may be waived for treatment of any runoff that is discharged entirely by pipe all the way to the ordinary high water mark to the major receiving waters, listed on pages 1- 37 ofthe 2009 KCSWDM. Enhanced Basic Water Quality treatment is required for any discharges to the existing wetlands on site. 10, Does the project have an expected average daily traffic (ADT) count of 100 or more vehicles per square feet of gross building area, per section 1.2.8.1 of the 2009 KCSWDM? If yes, the project must provide oil control in addition to any other water quality facility required. ff you have any questions contact Hebe Bernardo, Surface Water Utility Engineer (x7264). cc: lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Dtrector Kayren Kittrick 1 Development Engineering Supervisor Chip Vincent, Planning Director Neil Watts, Development Services Director h:\file sy~\swp-suric1c:e wc1ter proje<:ts\swp 27-surface water projects (plan review}\quendall terminals\first review.doc\HBaw £ ' I ,'t' I,'ffl J i; V I I ,, I I' "' 1. Introduction Quendall Terminals Is a proposed mixed-use development in Renton, Washington. The development includes five stories of residential or office space above two levels of above-grade parking or retail and restaurant space. The development project anticipates entitlement of the following: Table 1-1: Proposed Development Use I Quantity/Area Residential 800 Units Office 245,000 Square Feet Retail , 21,600 Square Feet ' Restaurant 9,000 Square Feet Parking ' 2,215 Spaces Note: All areas shown are gross building areas (GBA), The project site is located west of Interstate 405 near the northern city limits of Renton. The site is bounded by the Seahawks Training Facility to the north, BNSF railroad tracks to the east, and the Barbee Mill residential community to the south. Ripley Lane is located east of the BNSF railroad tracks and Lake Washington Boulevard is located southeast of the project site. See Figure 1 in the Appendix for the site location, This report is intended to support City of Renton entitlement processing for Master Site Plan Approval. The scope of this report is to address the sanitary sewer system for the proposed development · Design criteria will be outlined and a sewerage approach will be evaluated. 2. Predeveloped Site Conditions The existing site is vacant and is the former location of a log sorting and storage yard. The main site is approximately 20.30 acres in size, and the parcel east of the main project site across Ripley Lane North is approximately 1.15 acres in size. An existing 12-inch sanitary sewer main runs from south to north along the east side of the site within a 60-foot roadway and utility easement. The invert elevation of the existing sewer pipe is generally 10 to 13 feet below the existing ground surface. The existing Baxter lift Station serves Quendall Terminals as well as the Seahawks Training Facility to the north and Barbee Mill to the South. There are no other sewers located on the project site. An 84-inch Metro sewer main Is located approximately 100 feet east of the site's east pro. pertY line. See Figure 2 In the Appendix for existing site conditions . . __>-{' v~l ,,_,, A ,f.GiJ&~vWY ~JI-~~ I Ctk&t/.1 OF £.:TY ';%, 4, CenturyPaciflc, LP Quendall Terminals ;pp CenturyPadflc, LP Quendall Terminals ' ' I . . ,:l!lm I .,, . ' •.. t' , J f ~c 3. Developed Site Conditions The proposed site Improvements include a mixed-use development consisting of residential, office, retail, and restaurant uses, as well as new public and private streets and parking. Sewer mains will be constructed within the prnpased public streets. Sewage from the buildings will discharge to the new sewer mains via side sewers. The new sewer mains will discharge to the existing 12~nch sewer main at the east side of the project site at a new manhole constructed over the existing main. No improvements are planned for the 1.15-acre parcel east of Ripley Lane. See Figures 3 and 4 In the Appendix for proposed site plan and proposed sewer plan, respectively. 4. Basis of Design An on-site sanitary sewer system will collect and convey flows from Quendall Terminals. Adjacent sites are already developed and served by separate sanitary sewer systems. This report has utilized programmed project areas and Department of Ecology (DOE) criteria to establish projected sewer flows without provisions for future growth or connections. See Figures 3 and 4 In the Appendix for proposed site plan and proposed sewer plan, respectively. Gross building areas have been used for this report An allowance of 1,100 gallons/acre/day (gpad) has been made for infiltration and inflow since the proposed sanitary sewer system is expected to be below seasonal high groundwater elevations. The 1.15-acre parcel east of Ripley Lane has not been included in the infiltration calculation. · A peaking factor of 4.0 was included in the design flows. This factor should account for the dally and seasonal fluctuations in waste generation. This factor should also mitigate the impact of the varying flow generations for the different uses proposed with this project. The sanitary sewer system was designed to convey the estimated peak flows by gravity to the project discharge location at a new manhole installed on an existing City of Renton sanitary sewer pipe. The sewer capacities were established using Manning's Equation, with an "n" factor of 0.013. Sewer lines have been designed using the minimum slope requirements of the Washington State DOE. The pipe slopes used in the final design and future construction documents may be greater than the minimum slope to accommodate potential settlement, depending on the recommendation of the geotechnical engineer. ~ Lw~ ~ ~~d&-~? ?. f.' :;;;itJ~l-r :w-~ A ~'i-~~~f7tM.~,---r; 2, o .. 2 CenturyPaclflc, LP Quendall r'ermina:s EXISTING BAXTER LIFT STATION The Baxter Lift Station is an existing sewer lift station located at the northeast corner of the project site within a sanitary sewer easement. The lift station was designed in 2006 and was constructed in 2009. The lift station was designed for an overall peak flow of 594 gpm for the Seahawks Training Facility, Barbee Mill community, and the Quendall Terminals site. The lift station was designed and constructed with the following assumptions for future development of the Quendall Terminals site: Table 5-3: Lift Station Design Assumptions for Quendall Terminals (per Figure 6) Deveropable Acres 5 Tributary Area 5.0Acres Flow Rate 2,800 gpad Number ot Lntts 75 Tributary Area 3.0 Acres Persons/Unit 2.4 Flow Rate 100 gpad Average Sewerage Flow 22.2 gpm Design 1/1 Rate 1,500 gpad Peaking Factor 4 Design Sewage Flow 88.9 gpm Design 1/1 Flow 8.3 gpm Total Design Flow 97.2 gpm Total Design Flow Q peak hourly The sewer lift station was designed for a flow of 97.2 gpm from the Quendall project si1e. The anticipated flow from the Quendall project site is 614 gpm. The sewer lift station capacity will need to be increased by approximately 517 gpm to 1,111 gpm to accom.,.;;;date leveTopm,,-nt of the Quendall Terminals site. Per discussion with the City of Renton Public Works, the existir.g lift station has the ability to be modified to increase capacity by changing pump impellers and increasing the wet well capacity . .,See Figure 6 in the Appendix for Baxter Lift Station design details and Figure 7 for a record of discu?1on with the City. CUo~~ &-,--ti&,IL ·"f" ~~ l~ lu. fu..u/~/l...- l~k,~ ~ 'lo ~i*sAe& ~u.>t.~~ 6v<~•v.f'? ~v" Aw~~-~ f?i.5 ~;a,_:,;a; tz:%<;:-~-r'to>V-l,..w.e--l:;,--A K.i1..._.,MAW ~---ro~~.~ h~·M~~~ ~qr~ 6~ Art~ ~D~ ;lw f ~ /yl&-~iZ--A&~ fui_u~ A-rf ~ ~¥-,tffeV,t _..,-~ v~~,,,--r--~. . \)./,,1.,v~ ~';1i~~Acv·l~~~ t6 4 • Other available options are installing larger pumps but Dave did not believe that would be necessary as the existing pumps were specifically chosen to allow impeller modifications as they anticipated the need for additional capacity in the future. Fees: • Quendall has recently been assessed a capacity charge of $166k for their "fair share" of the Baxter Pump Station. This assessment was based on 111 gpm of capacity. I asked Dave if future assessments would be required if the flows exceeded the 111 gpm. Dave indicated there would be NO additional capacity charge assessments for the Quendall site only mechanical pump station upgrades to increase the pump station .Fracity to.meet 04.r proposed stte demand. -~ P-~ ~P~~l)) •. 1.v-~~ Ufmd-- '9o,~L ~6~¢' --·----··-·-· -- KPFF Consl:lting Engineers ~-------··---------- Page2 T eleph'Jne Record November 17, 2009 Figure 7 KPFF Consulting Engineers November, 2009 BUILDING USE AND DISCHARGE POINT PER TRIBUTARY AREA UNIT FLOW AND PEAK FACTOR PER BUILDING USE Trlb. Area ID Resid. Office Retail Rest. Disc~arge To Use Unit Flow, [GPD1 Peak Factor [UNJTS] [SF] [SF] [SF] Residential m (per unit:zl 4 NE Trib. Area 0 117500 4800 0 Reach 3 Office 0.2 [per sq ft} 4 SE Trib. Area 175 107500 4500 0 Reach2 ~-' ~ SW Trib. Area 1 360 0 0 0 Reach 2 SW Trib. Area 2 90 10000 6300 4500 React, 4 I---·--~ NW Trlb. Area 1 100 0 0 0 Reach 3 ~- NW Trib. Area 2 75 10000 6000 4500 Reach4 Retail 0.3 (per sq ft] 4 t--~~~ Rcstauran~ 50 [per _seat] 4 ,~. ( 1( 00 roer acre] 1 -/~cJ NOTES Total BOO 245000 21600 9000 Reach 1 11 Unit flows include normal infiltrallon BUILDING USE PER REACH Assumes 1.75 residents per unit -~- a Restaurant conversion: 1 seat"' 22.7 square teat of restaurant Reach ID Resid. Office Reta.ii Resl Rest. lnfil!ration due to high groondwaler ---- [UNITS] [SF] [SF] [SF] [SEATS:;] Reach 1 600 245000 21600 9000 396 FLOW PER REACH Reach 2 535 107500 4500 0 0 . Reach 3 100 117500 4800 0 0 Reach ID Resid. Office Reta~ Resl 1/1 Tol<1I -~ [GPMJ [GPM] [GPM] [GPM] [GPM] [GPM] Reach 4 165 20000 12300 9000 396 Reach 1 389 136 16 55 16 614 INFILTRATION/INFLOW C l~ 4 677-<:.,..,_. I SiteSize[AC] I Ffnwlf~Pn14n(j i::1,.,, ... rr..Du1 I ..-"Y~ ··- Reach 2 260 80 4 0 4 328 . Reach3 49 65 4 0 4 122 -- Heach4 Bl) 11 10 55 4 161 20.3 PIPE CALCULATIONS Reach ID Up~irm. MH Downstrm. MH Length Inner Dia Upstrm. IE Downstrm. IE Slope n a,.. a., a, .• %Cap. v~ Origin of Flow [FT] IJN] [FT] [FT] [FT/FT] .. [CFS] [GPM] [GPM] [FPS] REACH 1 REACH 2, REACH 3, REACH 4 . ·-SSMH #2 SSMH #1 335 12 19.23 18.49 0.0022 0.013 1.68 754 614 81% 2.14 -----···- ~- REAGH 2 SE Trib. Area, SW Trib. AreG 1 . SSMH #3S-2 SSMH #3S~1 276 ~-8 21.88 20.77 0.0040 0,013 0.77 344 328 95% 2.19 SSMH #3$-1 SSMH #2 276 9 20.67 19.56 0.0040 0.013 0.77 344 328 95% 2.19 ·-. . --~ ~ REACH3 _NE Trib. Arca, NW Trib. Area 1 SSMH #3N SSMH#2 340 8 20.92 19.56 0.0040 0.013 0.77 344 122 35% 2.20 .. REACH 4 SW Trib. Area 2, NW Tnb. Area 2 ·--~ ·-· SSMH#3W SSMH#2 271 6 20.64 19.56 0.0040 0,013 0.76 343 161 47% 2.19 I 'I Quendall Terminals Sewer Report Figure 5: Calculations ----'--=------.~---... ··=--------· ·---·-··, __ . __ ' • :1 I .t l l ' ' I I \\-,~----, f ,~~-1 \ ,;,;)~'!~:t.r-" -~ \. u -~----!-~-. ' ' \ t'~· ).~---,' r-:,:1\'l~\fsfl•·N-~Gii"~ll ' ,_ ... -~. \-......\__.,,., ~----~ .. __,J_,o \ \ ', \ ' 1-;<> ,.,,. (\ .. \ ., ';\\ ·. ,· ~- \\ \ \· / ) \ .~\\ if -'\\\ .a.\\ "\\\\ f ;\\ ,----=:i '%1- 'C "' ""'\\ ,\\ !, \\\ -~\\ \\\i,f \\ : .... J ' \'~) ,\ .. ~___./\ \\ \.>J..,, \ I_ \'-\"·\\, \ '<~ ·-· ~"l~i ~~:\\ = l ! '\\ • \\ ' _ _J ' ·\ \\\'. ' ! i r , It ,0 -_ \' . . :rc~~~n Pl.RH![~ m'P., -. 'r-···· ____ \[4c~~Ye.t.lf!,, .. ):,.Ain.:rv1>.'t'E:'·_0c --_----:--,:_______ -. .;'.Y"' Y!···1 ..ji>' -I u:f: <:~E;'!' ·nY" . . :?;: ; _ 1-'3 l~_-x,_~; 1 1 '[ I a ; -,-.. '---;;-'""' :,··_i ~,-.,! ,' ·-r~--rrir--1 _1 --,. -/ •. •f ---· ' C. 1~{ .. · ,,I I . ,:· ' wl '\'Tl:~Hl ITTf!.'ll"iS WAll ~111 , i I r-- ·, I H,v F, LJ 0 I IIR::l~I~ 11~51•1 ·1 ~:.:: ;·~·-"' ~+ • '-t";_,,_~~i';:i·i•f°;;;.~=~-~i:;,,=:,,2c-~~~-iJ.·1 ' I lr~-... / _! -...i.:"" o.,; ,l'fa) --iii_ ~---....... -: -------~.Y.)-_ 2_,,% ~ sv"~ /l'lRlV/tE -..,~ ' I PRJ7ATE '* •---1----/--- RfSINHTIAL [fr;.;!0 l~I ! J 11 I ,. \,~a~.::a.c;q ~~---j ,,t~ '" . -"~CT• ·rl" ___ .... ~~---= .c.-~·-4; .... : .... ,.".~r-~~----: ~; i' < ~-~:u~ --------~-.. ' y'i>-k/ ------------=---<5:,_ -----------kt-Tr --- PRIVATE ACCESS ii" r-,f!U-c11,m 1>a!'.' <<t("CIIF(J!IIS(l"l'J -----=--=--=---=---------------:---------------· I :li I lJ.k1; -------......... _ --------------------/--.lt-- -----c.!!'_<__sH1.vci ·-......:_ ----RIPIH __LA"s_ ./ J" "-------.._ '!11.!.i vo .--._ -------_ " NOTES: f'h'l>(r'f,,!11,11;.1. a:E\lfc!/.ntfl ~!1D ~1,r,.q~ :'.'f" ilff: f'ROl-'l'RT"' WI.L B'. •'.(fjl,JtTCO l'R'[lf,> '0 CE\•LYuutr. 11<[ [N\IIRllmlUHAl ,,m;:,;net1 ,,;r,.·cr \[PA) 10 -,,r i)')!I.J ~G(NCY fOO All Sil'" Rl~m;·i.11 \NP l!lll~Mc!i ~'.l'.)1,1~ Ml.::111.Rt IQ BE "!:<fO'<~C ,1 Ill( \/..'NDI.Ll 1[11\!lN'-1.S :ilTI: ~I/OE:: ~J<[~Utl(l ,1rn1~,. BIJ!LJ)t+; F(Kf [Ill"\ :·n,1w-:HON'i AW Pf'il,II; ijAY fl! P[')JI.Pfl' c---. '" --. -..... ,,,.,,,,,/ /c ' ,f, •• • FlCX>ll!! c·TI1J'Y O:t<~c:coo,6 SHAil. 8( U'.'Ul 8(Jlll [~ 0~<11(:!J."1 D 8,Ull-!!;0 :s',D IIN;~IJ('niP.1-D ~1 AOC~~ f,J ~•iM,1 lHF R'SI( OF r1.u,,;r 10 u1 ,t"t<; l~J'. rn vn,~t~n~, Sl !U:~Dil All TRANSPORTATION: IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDED AS MITIGATION MEASURES IN THE QUENDALL TERMINALS MITlGATlON DOCUMENT ARE APPLICABLE AND SHOULD BE PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION RtWf£.!,,i;~;!'.:'~;_,,, !!EW;P(l,l[H!S " CHft .Vf"R Clf','IS·cl'l D1<i£ Nr'.l\: I~-:20;'.'9 JOH ~• ,1,;00:::;(' OOl llll lOOS MHHI[ !00 ii; 1:lll:Rl·ljj\_ S : > L Ee ~'.; UOIU) lcpff '""'';''=·--'-•;•'""' "''"''·""'"'" ""'-'1>\&12 ............ .-. ~~'~ ~ -: . -II ,~ 'i,•,,%qf:.f ~- QUEHOAll TERMINALS '350 1.AK£ WASHIN.TOII BOWVARD, RENTON, W~ LANO USE, SHORELINE &: MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION CONCEPTUAL STORM DRAINAGE ANO GRADING PLAN s·,;-c:r C300 i l l ! I j ' l ~ .. ~ "<,, -=-~itll)l ll/~1£R--M~RK (CH\111,1) . \ SEENOTEl;2 150'()11,1,('DiJA()'. ------.... {TW fllllRE 'SHCllEl'N£J'"' \ / , / ·, ~oorr<<•m , , , . . -.. ·. ----~---........... ·~.-,· .. ' ~ .. ; , ._. -LAKI WASHINGTON I~ I I ,/-~---"°' , \'' \ / /-100IJ1W1,1SET8~C!< ~·· j ~ J;l / ",_" Sl®Fli.'ITT~Hl C / [l,d_RG¥0ISSIPA110N \ ',,,_ ),------,/ . OOTf/\lJ_'fjllli-_ _ ·_ '-.. .. ~ , --ac-_ • \ ocs,nu;c, I "' -\ >(. ·-/./ c,rno,o;~,a~, . . ---!:, ~""'' ' .~ .-'-\ ~· ' ,-. ' -'. ' I I --.. : . -', -. ' ' . / ;---~· ------\, \ \ ' ',I .~ . ,,.,,,, . ' . ---~--' \ , 1-, , -,t . -,,.,... ,.'7--:.. ., .. / .. 1 ,,./ ,-,SIOR~rtTER~~ULT ~..... , \ ' ----~ . / '·, •·•-i , I , , oo"" ,.__ I \ /-, \ ~~ ._ -~~-, •. /--j . ~'I-"-.. . . ------:--.. ~--r""'"""'" ,, ' """"''""" \ 1 ' \/ ' ' -~· ~-~~,_.,,." I--.."'=::.-------•~-~ -'.;~, .......... ~ \ ' ' " . ~. ',' ~"''""_':::~~ . -----'------, . ' -----~ ::;JO ~ ~ , ~1' ' , ,------/ / 11--_ . .; --.------n-------:----.....--...._ ' "' ~-------'------'---------\ '-. " ,~ ----I ' _, ' ·11 •· ~-, ~ \ \ _.-., --·---···.-·,ci,'ii:6'-,C _____..--.::.._-._'•_ •., • (-,e \ \ ·--=---l· . ~,..... ',/; -::::--· -' '\, ---\'" ff-':<'-·-· -- ~(\ -Cl -" -,-c:-~",),. ,-:.., \\.J~ ~-1 '• I • ;0 "--"' q '°''"""'"'"om.-\ \ \ ~ iJ ____ , 'L_ __ RESIDENTIAL [tE•ssj I~ C~E NOT[S: EH'~RO~l!EH[Al Rct,11<:IAmll ANO 1,!ITIGH•Cfl (l" 1)(: Pl!Cl'ERTY Will 8E CC,N(IIJCT!Jl f'ff.(JR 10 D£\fi(1'1.1£f1T. TH[ Et11<1RCtlMfl'j!Al Pfll"ITTOCtl ,r,rNCY (CPA) IS 1lf' LEAi) A(;!Nt:Y m> IJj_ sm: REMEDl.lnCtl AND MmGATION .ICTIC'IS l'IIIQ< '.RE 10 BE P~ED OT Tll[ QJFNIJ>U 1£R~INAlS JTL JN[lfR SJPERFIJ~D l lllf f'RCJ:Cl SITE NCLU'l!:S APl'IIO~MAlUY >,SBJ fEt CJ' SHIJIHI~ AlONG L.oK! WASHIIIGTCtl A 100--fOQI '11'!)11, RIP/.RIAN '.'£1llA{l( (MEASU'IUT fRl),l lHE ~I.RY ~l(l-l llATtR MAA<) AND PAAALLEI.S AlONG ll-iE SHOOEI.JHE. A 9'0REUIE R[S101ATION PLAN ,s BU.G f)(SlcJ!ED AND AP°'<OIW UNDIR IT'A ~RECTIIJI .l DJSIIN!; o,fJUNOS '.ND CCtlCEPll'/.1. Wll\l.ND CRU.TIOll/l!(STOOHCtl A~LAS Sl1QI\N NA,I:: HOT l>EC[l\/!"U ~NAl EPA DESIGN I.PPROVAL t 1.CDITIONAL SLIII.DING ROCf ORAIH CONNECTIONS I.Nil PIPIN~ ~Ar 6E ~iQ.:IRfD 5 :U-'!EU UT'Llli" r.l'.l!fflECTIOIIS SHfil 8( U5[1) B(l'fl!;[H Slll\!ClllRtD 8U~JIN0 AND UNS-R1JC11JRfD sm: Al![A~ m MINJM11£ Tl<E Rl'X CF rAMAGE TO UTILITIES Dllf TO Dlf!TR!NTI~l SETTlO,l£N' s• CHD 'AFPR REtstc PER MITIGATION REOOffMENl'S REVISION J I ls;\ . RES1D£NTIAI. wr1~~ R[SIOENTl•L fr;•,.~ [FFO:S.5] -----...6.-L.. _JJ_GE.eN~D, ____ _ =:J _J OCSli:ilD s, ''" IJ'F'P.\l,riiBYI '" DAT[ __ _ "ov~ JOB N<>..1500050 DISlNG Wl!IIJfl (SIT NOT[ JJ CONW'TlJAl M'Tl>HD <:Rt:ATIOO/llCSTQl!kTI\Jl (Sil NDlt .l) l.i!l llO IOOl ~Hfll1!001G !-I00-111-~~ S C A L E: AS "OTED lq,ff !601St01wea"•,'•"•""'-' "'"'"·"''"'"' .... ,..,, -... -...... i-J-Ul ~1 ,,.-----..._ I ·-··· Nlll'CU.o!IRG()f-. __ O'lllH OO!l.ET_ SSE NOll:S L ,le 5 m .1 POlINTI/,l i[: • :~ fl R\:J~INING ll'All • J ii•ls'.r luJ"'"'"'"'/iJ;-n RESIDHITIAL ,-·~1 ~-·-lfH55I I ,:::;/ 61 I ~ ,':'!' "" i:i -I ,--------.._ lrr,;~:51 ' < I: I 111·1 :,r'.j,/ • • ,, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION QUENDALL TERMINALS S~E~r "350 LAKE WASHIIGT~_ EOJL£V:',RO, RENTON, W~ LAND US[, SHORELINE & MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION CONCEPTUAL STORM DRAINAGE AND GRADING PLAN C301 ' ' * i I I l l I i ! ' ''f-.\'.,'.;::,f'.A•'': 1:i p(;JUlt;t;('; ·c 1',1:,\IH i•J; "-''P"INJ().'.\·iAGf-?.·· '-8 ~,[ H n.F'.')UlnF[ !'l -Pt.!MT. ! ,_. ,, I. U~,f ~ ~ ~ ~ ' J " ~I/ "'T ....... -S(,f°\ii;jj_.:·· i~N~SC>J'f l UIIDS'.'.:!.f'E 'Hff ,. .. ,;:.1T U<;f;,, '",l.:.(;T<)N EL;:":U!~~F3 /0 N;J \.-'Jl:H'·l'.) (,'•J · · ~-T'.r1 :, 'N:t , .. ,..,q_,,. nr-r:r -1:n~:; eat: THr u:;t-, =:· ;,~') ··::Jc:-; , '"J ·· --•: '-!Jf. ·r !T' :_:; · ~,u ,._. r! ,:n1__t/•F!'.<f'l['C\!!·-''.t:'.D /:.flf, rn::-,;;;1_ !() :+r-:T 'NII.'( t.:',ND·IC:f\l'l~V) IS ~ ,s' ,l')!'lr'lt.,1.\.~C~.::Vi 1::-?'i_ ., l'Nf / ... ~-s::;_-f:11:f"') ,r -,<,. f'.i.'*>IG ,\t,i STREET A ,i· ll--l'C • IS kf'" i'<'.!./1.:\llCN:,J, \,,· 10 :, '{,;,\, : Ff· I "~.li'll'''li)<; ·:-;:,c ,\=' "l(A'll.l. ,,1 · r:. ~,IIL '\.~~- • I -"-r ·r ~----1 ~ TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION ~-------- ·~ "'~ " -Ciii- ,.. ~, f/0,\\ A W R ,\'.I ~s ?~~IOC ~ ".JO[_iwj ~ m· ).(lf'lr•lJf/ l}N11,CM'[ ~Uut [i C, ·I ·, ; ti.c,:·,·rn~1r,: IC:fLFr -_.,,_,1 1_.,•;1 -<t-i:;n" ··,:r:1;,r---', P"' :w'.',Fti ,-. •':"If,··,;!'. _,\t:f • · ,'If, I "'I.' ,,,,;,,;I'~:.'" ,'.'1:Vlt-L· -:;_a,11°.:;: ~t= l,'J:f_'jj ~ ~ " \\:P ''C[ (' •P[ 1 ::, ,---··c j . H·om>"I ~ -· 11 u:_~·:.:_ .,,,,",:.~1 -~ ..... x±=-.l, ·---, ~--~-;.~~-: .... ~._:o :: 2 ~ I r;r.::n~<> f-E 1c+: --r r1:., i ,.'. ',\'I .. t I" nk·r.n s '"\ID 'h!:: ~,-,c, c-:r~ G,:::S)L'!"-V~ ()r, THF U3~ '_JF 'T f• 1: [.TS.CE..,. ~ • ~ ~ • i 1,· , :<\-:<:; ;,r::: nc:+; f-l l,:!fl:.~s, s r,·,1ci /JI'..; 'f"i =:::: i C-\-Vll.L \!M-4'.' !"Y" "'t}Cl')I'--;(; (>"4 ·; ,r ,.i <,f ca,: F:Tl-ff-T{ ·.<1r~:-,:1~ THE;'. -·,t.t- c1 r .. 1.!' .. ?SC:'Al~. ':11 I ! ! t Sf: N"'""' I -~-~==-==-~--~~~-::Wr ~;~~I DAit I I ''·1}~:'.:,-i I q10 I A'"FR. I ~n«rn ~:.~7~~:11~'.lJ~MEff:~ es NOV ,~, 20,~9 IN )A'.C JC tt ~o ,•I\IJIKc'~ S_m[U_jl_ -TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION ,s· ·a· q""ING • t ,-~-c· a...~im>) ::: ;.:n_ ~ " w-,;uw L~C -;c11;:-, •• i 10·w Ji,; ""' STREET C cIYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION 00[ 111) IJIMlS ~HIii[ IOO llC H1)H11-l~I ~ ~ A I. E: ~S N::>fHl lcpff '.iC!.I.! 1· '""'"'=·~ ,.,_,,,.,, "'"'~·""'''" _,,,,..,, -............. I ,,. 8' PAA!IING 1:1,; EB ',, ,lf<l'I/.IK ff1fNIH "0 ROA[,\11) ffiGfl>Hc'!f.WW-$~:f.l r1.~•.w:. SH P1.m (:'1'] !l' sco-•:.x l-'-'4 '.,:'011'( ~).'19lD5 T~ Rr•/.f'WAY El)<:;( IIH[ll[ hD 'lN-S"IEITl <IJ¥11C,, SH -".I.-~ (r,,; ; ! ~ ~ ~, 5 r:c:c. WILl[ cum C ""EE f w::':.: ;:,1;::::.;wALK. Ml!) H' fT[~ '.\:["):': L,\'4a>Sf,1\f'l[~s; /'Jr:i\:C, T'-JE E:U:J;ia\a(, :.r ii •I: : IMP H ,;; lh !·•,\S F•/,;:,K -:~(.; q;,P t.::'; .~ 'fr \.flf L 1 F\.U:.UIHC;a J.S Fi !'" '.,'.;l[)I"' Cl;!--W 1 ·> f :·=FT \!,/IDf <.;1:_i,:w:,.1 F :,f,[; 4 !" r=r l \\·;r:,f_ i ,,.;,; }~iCN 1 1w; M:Ar, fHE :0-:Ul '':ltJG !!F. ffGE-,~, ',O P.~'<e:.IH'.' ·:;.1:'.;V:;;· 1N I ·I': ()f10.IN() ; ·.,~'.)H '.~;::.,~;:::; l\ T i,-.. 'tc.: ,,,_;P1:or-,.-, 1,,i= 1'.;1;11 NOT tOR CONSTRUCTION OU[HDALL TERMINALS ,; .. ,,:n '350 lAKE W,\SH~ 80I.UYAAD, RENTON, WASHINGTON LAND USE, SHORELINE & MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION ROADWAY SECTIONS C302 ,{ ' ;, t ) l fj J § ) ~ --~-- ~~ ';yr::_'·--N() , . )t.'.l ~,. I ·u~ ~ :c c'IIL. ,:::,:,,· ,, /,"!f.T S'\ V<I:) ~ ".' 't/11 'i ·!, :,, I \!Aini I"• l ' ' 1 v~,gJ / 1} 1D' :[·· 1D' G' C".'<C(1l"Pj " _2!.,_ STREET D -TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE SECTION 1,. r r·r:· 1\i!ll" · i:st, R (, H. l ,011";!:" :, rYs' IJ i,. ;i!I" '-1'1 ''.l 'Hl i'"H .. l",1 -, Y<LZ 1· 0 4' --;,..,; .. -1 _iY- {j l-, 1 ,·,qnr 'l"~P ., 1; N:Vi n.1 ~ r:··· "CH 1:1, • ~ ,0 '§c}:~\f,) ~·~" 375~,1 ! ., + Ht .v~_P1~ __ 5_!l_.~?j p.~fl/ll·J.", ,.,,a.;,v; I t' l>Nl'SC~PC 1'.:~ I ''.:~·· c:---·~(rr<'i / ,/ J"J:. ~ STREET E -TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE SECTION ---------,~----------- /'''. .I\L TERNA TE SECTION SHOULD ALSO BE PROVIDED FOR THE PORTION CF STREET E WITH PARKING ON BOTH SIDES. Gf=t.'l' flr,I_ W] ft · lF )'i.[)[}n!ON{;,j pf;',ff"[) \N1!.J"1"t-4 !S HEOU!r:r.D Tf) vno'/1()': THr' r.,mw.,11.n,1 S!'?I\P!H-'l.10n Gl:H\TtJl trrn. !TY um:s; srr1rr1 \'!'()'\-/ ~OflCP! D ;;: W(;pi .r,·.·;: '.'lF'.1\f!Ct..Y NOT fOR CONSTRUCTION Cfil 110 Dll O!HIOi[IOO!!; , ,.,----< l-lll-411-1555 llf'1i1<D ~l WT' AWiS1116f ~l:~_:>:J'i PEOIJl!E~CW$ S : ~ l \ Pl ',,)';e'.}N AS Nc,rrn lq,ff ,~,,,.,,,._,,.,, """' ,.,,.,_,,,.,,,,, '"''"''"' ~ ............ ~~~ I Wt -' ';',,::; -""" QUEHOALl TERt.!1NALS 4350 LAKE WGIIIIGTOH BOULEVARD, RENTON, _!IASHttGlOM I LAND USE, SHORELINE I< MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION ROADWAY SECTIONS 'i"'IT C303 ' i l f ' l ! i ' " \··:~r 'I "' \ "f -/, c..1 ~ Jte p" ~ p j : a'.. --_/ "\ j' t-""' , __ , -/ ~ •.¥ --t,,-·" ts.j -------··" ...I_! !/~ _PlU'~],_E~'_,¢-_----::- "\ I rr~ -0 , ___ L, ,;n;:'cc,,:=d-, ''\le~-· \ " / -• J l:<i,; LJ l : • 'll'-1 N:'E~~~l ~,f.\Jl~G WI-U ,-,. Q.. ., ·-'_,---,,'.-.___ • ----~Lt:•'(-R<!'i_. 'l.iilJ:l · ~--\ \\'\'"'----<;}} --~~~~ Wl-liJ!fS2!10 ~\ \ -,__ '/, \ ·= = ,\ \ \ / \ \ ,_~\\\t,< \ "-'\\ -~- 1+\ " \.\:,\ -~~ \ . ~--\\ %.\\ _,,\' "'\\~\, ' \\"'C·,-\ \ \\ Y ,v\ \\\./--1 i ,\ ("\ \ '--~ (__ ________ ,) ' \\\.,,~0-\ \ , ' ,;,"f, l_ __ _ -\:_·, ·.\ \ c::-, --1_ ! ~} ', 1\ ·1 -,-~\\\J""l1 , •11 .it ~,\ \ LI........ : ' : ; ~J n............r, l I' I 1· I 1 ~\ ' ' \ ' \ \_ ._ '(......-----__ --:------! *""'' _ ) \, ~~~~;;;-;-Jl__,.;;6'--$ _:-, er BA!l[l([ll<LE!FPY ·-3(),':t.@Y'·--_-__ .,f·»i_ P~r-ffH(...__· ____ :;:~·R:r<fn:et,,,.·1=11-_ ~--------ST_RE~P V-j_)f,-4,.§1) s .:r. i7 ., . ' ",_-<' ---, • ·._· ~ : .. ·---------'--------~--~-----------1. . ·,e~=..__ I . - PRIVATE 'ACCESS .. ---"" ----------¢;:::==-~-~~--.;~ -------- ------.}~l<!_!!}_sHl!j_GT~ ~.-TJ ~.9TIS_;_ f'f·,"f!c•M1w.i ~>aDn(lll J.lin ~1,r,.1~ -~ ll!!: f'l!OPEl!"t 111,1J N: ro-1t•.,crc1> PR-:)! ·o mLYl!rnr THi rn1wrnwi:~TAc P<ci:cnC!l /;\,(~CY (IPA) IS '"l J.;!J,) mm.'Y f()\ .O.:J "" P.:MUP 1i)lj ;ND lU'GAT"1 Ar;i,:,r1,; '1111::ll Mi£ 1~ Bl: l'ERF01111Ell ,r JS£ o.:o~AU. TWllll<llS 51:t ~ $1.i'tRl"Ur,(I •orn1:,,11:. \"1.Jll/'l~G R(>J D'i•\I!-. ("i)'l~(CIION~ .\,\11 f';P!N\ ~Ar IJ! R:•Jl'fll"i' --.._ 1 J 81 :·11 I ~OT,l<T ~l RETMHJC "l!l 'L' . ' . • j l"I H, ~ ';(:<(/1< l D <.l -,;!:> ;~"' I ~, ' ...... "- ';'j'' '1 ;~:~·: '/,;!;:, I 1,---.___ ---,)ii: )I I I "',,._",_ S,.-_2!~ 11"<!VA!'P. ~-~ ) -S{l '- I·""'" 8.Q~ ' -~ 0-. ~,.-::. " /.. --~c _· ----------'i ~-s-k/ -----' ------_J.~~-;;----- I }1 -----------------~--;)-/_,-=------ Nru-cu;,s,,f'il.n PLQ"IC;:l!,J'i (ffi') ___ Rli:_!,_EY~ .;,/ .,,,,,,-- (C J F\D1lll.E oTTU"I ("(lll~f.cr,,:,!c; '.J,l-'I.L Ill' \)'.'<11 'lfl'lfl~ 51"'1CIUR!.ll 8J',1'11<C'.' '-'-~ 1/11'.-llll}:n,PCn sn: Ix{,\') I() \ll<llli;J' "HI R,,l( IJ ~·~~CJ 1:, V' no 1, .. : n1 l"Jl,~EHTTAL ~11.l~Jll. ALL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDED A$ M1TIGATION MEASURES IN THE OUENDAll TERMINALS MITIGATION DOCUMENT ARE APPLICABLE AND SHOULD BE PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER. " < " NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION [;R~llll er IJloil~lO ~r t l l 1".. "-"--,---------J~ftr~~A 1~~ Bi ! I ·ewe I I I P.t'A51:J f'(fl Ml'tr,,t~,<)j 11:l'.ill.REl,<ET-l'.S ,,,·, .,.··,: ~y C,'ID ~·'FR ' REvrs,oN JOH l>s> 15000:,r NOV 1fi~ 200~ Clll llOJ[!IM[~ l!Hf\11100LI: _ 1-IJH14-5155 S ~ ~ I. I AS NCiITO l<pff ~";,',~::..':."',~,'''''""' _,.., . .- QUENDAll TERMINALS .fflO LAI([ WASIIHGTOII BOUI..E.VARD, R£KTON, WASIIIIIGTON LAND USE, SHDRELINE & MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION CONCEPTUAL STORM DRAINAGE AND GRADING PLAN ,:,·1r1 C300 ' ; 1 ! I ! I J I ] ~-,·--..______ __ LAKE WASHINGTON . r'.il ·~~ ---------- -~"-r;,, ~r ',i·,:_~:---~ ~ r-:,O'[JIIW'.<TllACK . """~ ,~ wm~ ,~wJ-, . . 1.. , ' .• , ~,;;·:~,;, r·aoo~wsm"' .· .·. . ·. . \ I • "· \ pw rnrn,s,,ru"'I" , °'""' ""' ~ ·~ .· _ ., '-s is I / _]]}'-\ ~ ac........_--!'.sD " < \ -----_ / '"~"'"'""~ .>.._/". . . ---, , I '----, ' r-OO»c•e , , -, , -~--· 's , °'""-, Sl!JNil'tl'.RMHl I ~ _\ .,/ ' • / / r/ / _ =rn•C'"C, o', -_ -._ _ _>.-·; '}{ '""'"'"''°" \ -~ -.._ _ -~ .-;;;;,""'""'"" ·', , oicec•,m,~ . ·1· .. · -~, '. -. ,'""·\. I I ---~-~-~--·.:_, '', . \ , .-\ / .:· . ..·· ''__ ·.,,, -t. ___ .c:..;:.~:-~----~ ~ .• , c~----~-:::-~',, .... _ >;'8_ . \ L 1·-1 ~. \~\? .. <\<is:i \ -'.::.?~ . \ .\ ---: " ,f_,5;, • \ c::__; ~I IIIGH f'dii ::_/ : \li'JB'l!'ASS 01 ~ '-...._ _ _.. ----;<l},I' / ~--I \ ---h -~---......=. ,;· ---=:;,mo ' -~--, -, ---, "'~ / --~ -;;; '" ""~~--a--~-.--~n . -. ~ -, '"""'" .. ,. --~ , ""'" ~--~-.· i ·-.,, ', ,,•,mco•·~ '(/, '--' f' "J' ' ,,_/' --,." ----' -----w >'f','S'S B" _ 11 1 --.... Pl,'£SCT111N~v~uu-=-:: : 1 . <S -·-''.. . . I . !; IIT'illl ,., ;· -----',. .·.J, "''''"""t . -.• " . ~ .. oo.,~, .· I . L "'"" rum ] ·· , --c-:;-__.. ---~ I! ' \ ' V') ~ '\ "a' \ I, r, ' ' ' ' -',[f NOITS .. & 5 I I. '1 "'"""'''"~'-'<nUr', --1'.~j-+ ~I -· J ---' '""'"' -, . '~ lrrc~5 al " RESIDENTIAL OrJfNnAL ~:T,W<IMG 11'<:I ---~~~~ @TE__s_;_ f~IIROIIMENTIJ. 1'!£WEOIATION IJfD ~l~GATIIJN (f" Tlf_ PRCl'ERT'f )Ill;_ 8[ CONO'JCTID PR11J! TO D£\'[\_C!'l,l[H1_ lHE EN~RONM£NTN.. PROTECTIOI Af.rNCr (Fr A) 15 r~, LEI.O IJ:I. NCr Fffi ',;_]_ Sl1E R[w:l)IAf\01 A~Q M'nGATIIJN ACTIONS illll\li /.RE TO BE PSl!fcmlEil Al FH 0,)(NDIJ.l. TES~INAcS "lll ll~DfG Si,;n<1.IN0 TII PRW:CT SITE INGJJDES APPR0m.tA1£Lf '.58] f"UT (N" SHCHltlE IJ.OOG LAKE 11,;J.JIMGllJN A 100-'00i WDTH RIP/JUAN SEIBAC~ (~[AsmlD fRl1.I TH[ ~',RY ,11)1 WATER MAA<) AND PAl'Aill[S I.LC'% lHE SHCREl..lH£. A 911)1l[LINE RES10l1ATIIJN f'l.'1l IS Elf!N(; DrnG'<ED AN(I WPRQl([l 1.,11D[~ tl'A DIRE:C~ [)(ISIINI; l'l{JL/.NOS AAD C[MolClPIIJIJ. Mcll.Al!D Cl![An(ltljR!.SIIF.A~ I.H[AS SHO'°"' HAio\: l<OI flfCEl'IED FJN!,J,. EF'A 0CSIGN I.PrnO'/AL Af)C,Tli)Nl,l ff"'IW~G ROCf DRAlN CONNICIIONS /,HO PIPING ~Af H!. R[QJIRf<: 5 'liXIEU UTILl!Y Cl:ll+lEC~S SHfil 8C ITTD BEl'IIITH SIR\JCllJR[D iUWNG~ All~ UNS'R\JC'IURED Sill 1.RfAS TO Ml~J,112[ l)j[ Rl<;J( rf DAM•:;: TO UTILITIES DUE TO C'lllR[HllAl SETTl£r,IEJ<l LEGEND: --i _I EllST'JffG '111'.:TLI.I{) [SEE HOil J) COOW'l\Jll '11(11.AMJ CIUl~/RESTORATlO!I (511 NOT( ~) f=E=l .. I I r:;f"' Clll ao imn OIHfOil lOU II . l-~-lll-555i lq,ff '"'''"''-"'"'"";o; .,..,.,.,w,,.101 ... .,,..,, ........ -~ a, 0:YD APl'R Rrnsm PER MlnGAll~ f':EOOIREJ,IENTS REVISION J QB N, .. 1500C50 S C A L E AS NQTf.D ='I l ".. ' .,t; ,1 RESIDENTIAL fG.G"~j • I il....l......l: -J~ --la....-l,...._ ;l\ /p/' • • ., NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION QUENOAll TERMINALS -4350 LAKE. WASHINGTOII BOUL£V/JtD, RENTOl4, W~ LAND USE, SHORELINE I< MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION CONCEPTUAL STORM DRAINAGE AND GRADING PLAN SHlll C301 ' ' '."! f l ; ?: ! j ' fi •,) '"T-'.f':'"I '.\"IPF. i A!~:;· t"f· '1fC(+1' ,,tlf v; P1.:,11.:\]IU10'). q:·w,\'• !:f·I "CNr'l "'W,\ \ ! H('tl' ,Y "AH-3'\IG .;,,;,;>:.c~ ,A·,y., .. , ·,,-.;:u .. :,1 r·; er ,-1·r.- ,,,u:·1,:.'ll.1s' .-'-'IL "fC-:l•1::;;, '','i\." '''! fTt")~ .... ('I il. ft.II .. ll:,l , 9 s ~ ~ [ ,,, ~ ' . ~-·-" ul:'flr•tK/ -1-.. "!;t{iiiii/"" L'i!!l'SC~ot · Lml:'S::•PE ''l"H'T i_1'·1AH' ··--·. 1i"LAl'I + ' i-s· ct;l8(N") ':~ 1.~-..,::i cp.<: W'P-'H -.,r TF"' ' < ;=.;:, C~:C'-J Ell:1-M::'F:~i ?N) V:ID':"HS ,- ; l \'t,r;v IJ' :•;·:>H.'l'cX,; t>:,.J l ''.,f c) STREET A TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION 1;11-:r:: ,:__;,1 -.,r,::, ,c: nic· c,-~,c:r:·, :;. I"" 1 fi'-!' -~~r ll,: H CU:f"Tf! ,\1,r Tl')t;r,I 1-~ ~r:FT 'i,TIF \ N~rn;.t,Pl'V· l • :;u!F f' -'.MD JI·· t,; 1c '<IC .~ pr, tt:'CK} !,P.:J',,~n-.T '(I :·Hf·: ··'."'.R!,!cf j i • • " !i:"(V,iii/ii:ii:,S6,ii""" ,..-,11,, [fl::l: (·'"ltd[ "·__?1 g I(;' --~p,>(!(lN&---- "" ~ H/'QJ~(Jrr) <:: I.::..!:! ,, i<NT 2! -SULE.''= 4' ~i 't,::~_1-i"-tiT V.'1:;;'-{ ,,· L•llt _;;_ ~ ~ HF ,":f:!C:S'."_C :_"-:T'.:T:C·\J; l".'Pf1 ,; M-:D W![;THf'J 'JN HF\:''' P. '.-YIU. \l:\F;v·. ;:-.:r.:n: :;'c,'J Tf ,!'>'. STREET_B TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION ."\JCS()~;:~:: I~''.: c,:., iE: ;-;·'-Hl:_:;LT. ~ 1_i:_~r11.: 6' I! P>F><lf!G " 10· llf.l.i~ l/Jl( )(:Alf: ,. -i 11Y1r "" ~ • 8 ~ I ,-Hi WR8o.m>) ~ ~ :~3. , l~ +----GR~/S'.-> 0:.cc: ·:''-J :: !.l \ff~~"'.] 1\'-:P 'tf'l.11 H::, ON 11:;L:.E:·· ,_::'NU .. \·/ . "I..C'i~JCS ')~~ r_: CH<"~()~: "lf 1;· Vi! T Sl."k. 1/~ T~:C ':':-Tll(?iT [}j[C~rn 9l ClllllO D~ ~~ lfll \00 It 1:1:1-m,~~ E !.~ f'ASF'-ff'-1'. '-'·' ·,n- STREET C -TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION ------------------SCALI-::·~ 4' "'"'·'"ff""''"'··""" ,..,,. .• _ .... ,,.,to, ,..,,,,.,, ........,._,..,_ ',c .)~:!-: 01[) I A~PfEMEN1S E~- NTJ ·--;:,;.ij.' N-'.lV ,~. 2~:7:9 JOH N> .,:,()C:::,(' S ,: ,1 L E AS NOrF.ll lqJff " "" l)T<:;;· A .:r-.1 ~s w· c-Ofii'IJ</ ,_,~r:,;:~1: ~tll.'1, [! - 1 -, " '.'i.f'fc ! .~\I ,,.;t.l"IW' ··-IPP\'/\.,-:,,1)1, ',·';c",1 11:-,:.: .' :--,c,rc·1;' w p_· ~.t.P,,(~-:~ 91.lt~-- t>' Scit~il.<,~ ~If[ 'Nlir-' 'Rd,· !:I.~ .:i" EB o· e· PAA~l!C ~ 1 .!:.~t 9(0-0.U,: [XTlNOS "o Rc'IDli~~ EflGI: M!c"f. NO :-,, -,<Rcfl l"/.H~N~. 'H fHN (:"•1'1 _1,.~ll~ t-.?~ '.,CO•l!(EnEIIDS10R01.[lWh EC""..£ "1E!sf ,o QU-S'l'EIT f",<fl~'NC. >1:E PIJ~ [!"") ~ O.""' I r;;Ll W!Ol ·~,u~m. ,_; t-[F1 VVl'..)f.: :-~;f_")f:•N(,LK. i\NP rn FC~T W:DF. '.Ml)SC!1 f'll'-Kl NF:.AFO THF DUL DI\IG !I" f-W e,ric 3~D "'LOOR H/-S FArc:<:r·+'.J GA").l:GE HE:3:('U-HIA:. FUii '.W'.I({, ~sn WIDF Cl n1:1. ·1 '.' FE~ 1 W!Df. Sl')EW!\Lh. /,Ni"J .t "'Ff-_·1 fr!DE , __ AM,SC,:l.?l~JG '\J[:~•J{ f"HL nu zyv:;.q,;c; Gi\HAG:: 11-J THE C,SOI.JN[l If·' t,·, "0f""Tl0'-' -w: H IF n, q ')IJ,J~~, 3( ., ' '• c,, . ,,.,., .· ... '" Jfl[fl!: 1,::.HC ~~fJ,R T'0E NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OUENDALL TERWIHALS s,u:r -43~ wt WASHINGTON IIOIJLEVARD, REKTON, WASKtr,TOtl LAND USE, SHORELINE & MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION ROADWAY SECTIONS C302 ' " ~ } i l ' ' ' 9 YA!vl [l () \'s ["~\" I 'NIPI & C -rr; >'!if;f: I/Cl •>;"F ;;_' l 1J' a· lQ :. 11· . UHC: T, .. ,.,;" ·1 I . . ,·,.,,,,,w, I .. -'_~_,;? / ?~ -!;;'.. I • U.,, ,-IT F/6:C\1::NT •·1 STREET D -TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE SECTION( D SI"-' J',,· 'l·'"l ,\'!Pf '.:I· 'I' G f.' Ni!,'!IH ~ F,::·. 'l C'[_,l'f._!if• rs,,cu1 · ·m 1:-r'"1 w::t' pt,'l>IN-:, ' ~ i;,N{o9:Af'c ·-1---1('' l•H[ l<Hi: Ctc:!lll!111') >,\·)n,-T .. :! V/!i·'.H STREET E -TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE S£CT10N )('AU· ( c 4 ·;;l'.l''' )': [l,SVi/.,\Pf ·~ ;-.- Al TERNATE SECTION SHOULD ALSO BE PROVIDED FOR THE PORTION OF STREET E WITH PI\RK!NG ON BOTH SlDES. NOi FOR CONSTRUCTION GRA~--Di.o1WC·81 --~-·· "A,D wr J 00 TWlJ BOS1N[SS Qllwn ~l Al'Pl!D.f]l BY im !U~ YOU oo; ~ ... ~ 1-soo-m-5555 ··------NOV 16. 20"'9 cce4c-,,,,-~--RiK<D PE'. 111;~:\~~0NP-E',IJF[~\1!.:~ JOH N>-:"I\O:J'.J!,(> '.~~ :01\.:~ r;HD IF·>·• 1qJff ... ,,,.n ...... ~ I ~-t§i'.1'=1:.r,:··./ /_ '"'""''·"""·" l.'f.-'j, :J?r ~.~;:;'~ ·. 1/ 11' i~"t'}.{:~t·~- OUENDALL TERMINALS 050 I,\~ WASH~ !IOIJLEVARO, l!EMTOH, WASHM:aOII LAND USE, SHORELINE & MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION ROADWAY SECTIONS '.•f[-1 C303 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM March 28, 2016 Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager Brianne Bannwarth, Development Engineering Manager Traffic Concurrency Test -Quendall Terminals; File No. LUA09-151 The applicant is requesting Master Plan Review, Binding Site Plan, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and SEPA Environmental Review for a mixed-use development located at 4350 Lake Washington Blvd. The site is 21.46 acres and is zoned Commercial/Office/Residential (COR) and located within the Urban Shoreline designation. The 21.46-acre site would be divided into 7 lots of which 4 would contain 6 -7 story mixed-use buildings. Overall, the development would consist of 692 residential units (resulting in a net residential density of 40.95 units/acre), 20,025 square feet of retail and 9,000 square feet of restaurant. The applicant has proposed to dedicate 3.65 acres for public right-of-way, which would provide access to the 7 proposed lots. Surface and structured parking would be provided for 2,171 vehicles. The site contains approximately 0.81 acres of wetlands and 1,583 linear feet of shoreline along Lake Washington. The proposed development would generate approximately S,656 net new average weekday daily trips. During the weekday AM peak hour, the project would generate approximately 435 net new trips (104 inbound and 331 outbound). During the weekday PM peak hour, the project would generate approximately 530 net new trips (340 inbound and 190 outbound). The proposed project passes the City of Renton Traffic Concurrency Test per RMC 4-6-070.D as follows: EXHIBIT 17 Transportation Concurrency Test -Quendall Terminals Page 2 of 3 March 30, 2016 Traffic Concurrency Test Criteria Implementation of citywide Transportation Plan Within allowed growth levels Project subject to transportation mitigation or impact fees Site specific street improvements to be completed by project Traffic Concurrency Test Passes Evaluation of Test Criteria Pass Yes Yes Yes Yes Implementation of citywide Transportation Plan: As shown on the attached citywide traffic concurrency summary, the city's investment in completion of the forecast traffic improvements are at 130% of the scheduled expenditure through 2016. Within allowed growth levels: As shown on the attached citywide traffic concurrency summary, the calculated citywide trip capacity for concurrency with the city adopted model for 2014 is 85,884 trips, which provides sufficient capacity to accommodate the 5,656 additional trips from this project. A resulting 80,228 trips are remaining. Project subject to transportation mitigation or impact fees: The project will be subject to transportation impact fees at time of building permit for each new building. Site specific street improvements to be completed by project: The project will be required to complete all internal and frontage street improvements for the building prior to occupancy. Any additional off-site improvements identified through SEPA or land use approval will also be completed prior to final occupancy. Background Information on Traffic Concurrency Test for Renton The City of Renton Traffic Concurrency requirements for proposed development projects are covered under Renton Municipal Code (RMC) 4-6-070. The specific concurrency test requirement is covered in RMC 4-6-070.D, which is listed for reference: D. CONCURRENCY REVIEW PROCESS: 1. Test Required: A concurrency test shall be conducted by the Department for each nonexempt development activity. The concurrency test shall determine consistency with the adopted Citywide Level of Service Index and Concurrency Management System established in the Transportation Element of the Renton Comprehensive Plan, according to rules and procedures established by the Department. The Department shall issue an initial concurrency test result describing the outcome of the concurrency test. Transportation Concurrency Test -Quendall Terminals Page 3 of 3 March 30, 2016 2, Written Finding Required: Prior to approval of any nonexempt development activity permit application, a written finding of concurrency shall be made by the City as part of the development permit approval. The finding of concurrency shall be made by the decision maker with the authority to approve the accompanying development permits required for a development activity. A written finding of concurrency shall apply only to the specific land uses, densities, intensities, and development project described in the application and development permit. 3. Failure of Test: ff no reconsideration is requested, or if upon reconsideration a project foils the concurrency test, the project application shall be denied by the decision maker with the authority to approve the accompanying development activity permit application. The Concurrency Management System established in the Transportation Element on page Xl-65 of the Comprehensive Plan states the following: Based upon the test of the citywide Transportation Plan, cansideratian of growth levels included in the LOS-tested Transpartatian Plan, payment of a Transportation Mitigation Fee, and an application of site specific mitigation, development will have met City of Renton concurrency requirements. \IE\V ____.;1 Barbee Mill !\ccess NEW ~ QUENDALL TERMINALS +-<' ---NEW Lake Washington Blvd NEW -''--II> · 1-,; ''. \/_'.;;'.,'l :·,:-c,n ,:;; to[> "':.".>"' , '.C')~,,:,,-,;;\i()"I •;: 'NS! ?()T Rii:lev Lr aka Se ah a\11ik::. \\' i:!1/ GJEW ... ) "l's,_'"_ t,JEW N I ADDITIONAL MOTOR VEHICULAR LANES REQUIRED TO MITIGATE PROJECT IMPACTS (Included in DEIS, EIS Addendum, FEIS, or Mitigation Document) EXHIBIT 18 Project Name: Quendall Terminals Date of Hearing April 19, 2016 REFERENCE COPY Staff Contact Vanessa Dolbee Current Planning Manager CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER, EXHIBITS Project Number: LUA09-151 ECF, EIS, SA-M, SM Project Contact/Applicant Campbell Mathewson, Century Pacific, L. P., 1201 Third Ave, suite 1680, Seattle, WA 98101 Project Location SW Y. Section 29, Township 24 N, Range 5 E. Parcel 2924059002. South of the Seahawks Training Facility The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit 1: Exhibit 2: Exhibit 3: Exhibit 4: Exhibit 5: Exhibit 6 Exhibit 7: Exhibit 8: Exhibit 9: Exhibit 10: Exhibit 11: Exhibit 12 Exhibit 13 Exhibit 14 Exhibit 15: Exhibit 16: Exhibit 17: Exhibit 18: Staff report to the Hearing Examiner, which can be found at the following link: http://rentonwa.gov/business/default.aspx?id=32800 Environmental Review Documents -Draft EIS, Addendum to the Draft EIS, FEIS and Mitigation Document, which can be found at the following link: http:// re n tonwa .gov/business/default. a spx ?id=3 2800 Environmental Review Committee Signature Sheets Neighborhood Detail Map Binding Site Plan Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Dismissing Appeal and e-mail chains following request. Site Plan (black and white and color) Parking Plan (black and white and color) Area Outline of Spaces Elevations Conceptual Landscape Plan Conceptual Storm Drainage and Grading Plan Roadway Sections Conceptual Utility Plan EA Letter addressing EPA and public involvement in the process Advisory Notes/Plan Review Comments Concurrence Memo Additional Lanes Required DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NOTICE OF ISSUANCE AND AVAILABILITY FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (FEIS) AND MITIGATION DOCUMENT Notice is hearby given under WAC 197-11-510 and RMC 4-9-070 that the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and Mitigation Document for the proposal described below was issued by the City of Renton Environmental Review Committee on Monday, August 31, 2015, and is available for public review. Copies are available for review at the Renton Main Library, located at 100 Mill Avenue South, and the Renton Highlands Branch Library, located at 2902 NE 12th Street, and at Renton City Hall, Customer Service Counter, 6th floor, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton WA 98057, and on the City of Renton web site: (www.rentonwa.gov). APPLICATION NUMBER(S): PROJECT PROPONENT: PROJECT NAME: LUA09-151, EIS, ECF, BSP, SA-M, SM Campbell Mathewson Century Pacific, L. P. 1201 Third Ave, Suite 1680 Seattle, WA 98101 Quendall Terminals DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The proposal is located adjacent to Lake Washington on 21.46 acres of Commercial/Office/Residential (COR) zoned property. The EIS evaluates potential impacts resulting from a mixed-use development project, including four Alternatives, of which considers no action. The Preferred Alternative would contain 21,600 square feet of retail space, 9,000 square feet of restaurant and 692 residential units. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: 4350 lake Washington Blvd City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1055 S Grady Way Renton,WA 98057 DOCUMENT PURCHASE INFORMATION: The Final Environmental Impact Statement is available for purchase from the Finance Department on the 1'' Floor of Renton City Hall for $35 per hard copy or $10.00 per CD, plus tax and postage (if mailed). PUBLIC REVIEW: The impacts described in the Quendall Terminals DEIS and EIS Addendum are the basis for the mitigation measures established in the Mitigation Document. The Mitigation Document is designated by the City of Renton as the first decision document for the proposal. EXHIBIT 3 ERC ISSUANCE.~ AVALABillTY/ FINAL•ENVIROl'lMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND MITIGATION DOCUMENT PAGE 2 of 2 APPEAL INFORMATION: Upon issuance of the FEIS and Mitigation Document, a twenty (20) day appeal period commences. Pursuant to WAC 197-11-680 and RMC 4-8-110.E., the adequacy of the Final EIS and the Mitigation Document may be appealed. Appeals must: 1) state specific objections of fact and/or law; 2) be submitted in writing by 5:00 p.m. September 24, 2015; and 3) be accompanied by a filing fee of $250.00. Appeals must be addressed to Phil Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, Renton City Hall, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: If you would like additional information, please contact Vanessa Dolbee, City of Renton at (425)430-7314 or vdolbee@rentonwa.gov. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: Gregg Zi Public W Community Services Department September 4, 201S August 31, 2015 ~ /5,i/J5G:~....,...,,.-- DatJ1 Mark Peterson, Administrator Fire & Emergency Services 8 -5/-!5 ->=C:::.-:€:::;__.___::J:___:,., ____ =----_si-=- Date C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator Department of Community & Economic Development Date ·<t: L?.r /,~ ' I Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NOTICE OF ISSUANCE AND AVAILABILITY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ADDENDUM (EIS ADDENDUM} Notice is hearby given under WAC 197-11-510 and RMC 4-9-070 that the Environmental Impact Statement Addendum (EIS Addendum) for the proposal described below was issued by the City of Renton Environmental Review Committee on Monday, October 15, 2012, and is available for public review and comment. Copies are available for review at the Renton Main Library, located at 100 Mill Avenue South, and the Renton Highlands Branch Library, located at 2902 NE 12th Street, and at Renton City Hall, Customer Service Counter, 6th floor, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton WA 98057, and on the City of Renton web site: (www.rentonwa.gov). APPLICATION NUMBER(S): PROJECT PROPONENT: PROJECT NAME: LUA09-151, EIS, ECF, BSP, SA-M, SM Campbell Mathewson Century Pacific, L P. 1201 Third Ave, Suite 1680 Seattle, WA 98101 Quendall Terminals DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The proposal is located adjacent to Lake Washington on 21.46 acres of Commercial/Office/Residential (COR) zoned property. The EIS Addendum to the Draft Enviornmental Impact Satment (DEIS) issued December 10, 2010; evaluates potential impacts resulting from a new Preferred ")lternative. Similar to Alternatives 1 and 2 in the DEIS, the Preferred Alternative is intended to be a mixed-use development. The Preferred Alternative would contain 21,600 square feet of retail space, 9,000 square feet of restaurant and 692 residential units. For those assumptions that have been modified under the Preferred Alternative, the updated analysis is included in the provided EIS Addendum. These elements include, Critical Areas, Aesthetics/View, Parks and Recreation, Transportation, Cultural Resources and Relationship to Plans and Policies. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: 4350 lake Washington Blvd City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 DOCUMENT PURCHASE INFORMATION: The Draft Environmental Impact Statement is available for purchase from the Finance Department on the 1" Floor of Renton City Hall for $25 per hard copy or $10.00 per CD, plus tax and postage (if mailed). ERC 1~suANcE & .1'>VALABIUTY/ CNVlr{ONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ADDENDUM PAGE2of2 l?UBLIC REVIEW: Written public comment on the DEIS will be accepted for a 30-day review period ending at /00 p.m. Monday, November 19, 2012. Written Comments should be addressed to: Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner, Planning Division, 5th floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: If you would like additional information, please contact Vanessa Dolbee, City of Renton at (425)430-7314 PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: October 19, 2012 October 15, 2012 I 10/1<,)2c;l 711s(/ir,/······-·····,_ \_ ·// t-/ ~ _ _ _ (tJ :1s;r1_c Dati I Mark Peterson, Ad' inistrator Da e Fire & Emergency Services j(1 li-s //,;;;;. Da~ c::: £0 \) \,~~~d ____ _ C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator Department of Community & Economic Development 10 Ii s-I 2c1 12 -··- Dat'e DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNll Y AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NOTICE OF ISSUANCE AND AVAILABILITY DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (DEIS) Notice is hearby given that the City of Renton has issued the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for Quendall Terminals mixed use development on December 10, 2010 pursuant to WAC 197-11- 510 and RMC 4-9-070, and is available for public review. Copies are available for review at the Renton Main Library,the Renton Highlands Branch Library, and Renton City Hall, Customer Service Counter, 5th floor, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton WA 98055, and on the City of Renton website (www.rentonwa.gov). APPLICATION NUMBER(S): PROJECT PROPONENT: PROJECT NAME: LUA09-151, EIS, ECF, BSP, SA-M, SM Campbell Mathewson Century Pacific, L. P. 1201 Third Ave, Suite 1680 Seattle, WA 98101 Quendall Terminals DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Quendall Terminals mix use development DEIS considers potential development concepts for the redevelopment of a 21.46 acre Superfund site located along the shoreline of Lake Washington. The OEIS evaluates potential impacts resulting from the proposed development. The following are alternatives evaluated within the DEIS: Alternative 1, which consists of 800 residential units, 245,000 square feet of office, 21,600 square feet of retail and 9,000 square feet of restaurant; Alternative 2, which consist of a less dense alternative where the office component is eliminated and residential units are reduced to 708 units; and Alternative 3, a no action alternative. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: 4350 Lake Washington Blvd City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 DOCUMENT PURCHASE INFORMATION: The Draft Environmental Impact Statement is available for purchase from the Finance Department on the 1" Floor of Renton City Hall for $25 per hard copy or $10.00 per CD, plus tax and postage (if mailed). PA.G~ 7. uf 2 PUBLIC REVIEW: Written public comment on the DEIS will be accepted for a 30-day review period ending at ·,:00 p.m. Monday, January 10, 2011. Written Comments should be addressed to: Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner, Planning Division, 6'h floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. A public hearing will be held on Tuesday, January 4, 2011. at 6:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 7'' floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: If you would like additional information, please contact Vanessa Dolbee, City of Renton at (425)430-7314 PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: December 10, 2010 December 6, 2010 ~1fJJl~~~~~---·· -D-at_e __ _ Public Wo;rs Department /) 1/7 ·;ry;Jl /15[_~-- Mark Peterson, Administrator Fire & Emergency Services -----~--1 C.-·+-::-~---~- Terry Higashiyama, Administrator ;ommunity Services Department IZ.l ~ / 1ri Date ~ ..... Alex Pietsch, Administrator Department of Community & Economic Development 1v(u I(!) ·····--------·---------~---- Date LAKE WASHINGTON N + ,<!, »:lli<j.,~C,"""l?, i : #c ;?' ~--< ' ,' !PROJECT SITE! 20.3AC U-4osl ~ " U-4osl !BARBEE MILL ENTRANCE I---... ~ IN 42ND PL! -~ ' .,. -~ ,/"~LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N! .,,~ ;, ,, ;r i GRAPHIC SCALE: ..., D Oft EXHIBIT 4 NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP QUENDALL TERMINALS OESCR1Pl1CN: THAT PORTION C'S ~ LOT 5 N SECllON 29, ~ 24 NCRTH, RANOE 5 El<ST, W.U., AHO SHDRELANP ~IIC Ll'IHC 111£STERI.V C'S M --PACFIC R .... ll!OAD RIGtlT-C'S-WAY AND SDU,.___Y Df A UHE, N l(ll,l(l COUNTY, --,at, DESCl!IBED AS ra..L.O'/IS: BEOINIING AT THC QJARltR CORNEIi ON "IHE SClml l.K Clf SAID SECTIOl<I 21: T\ilDIOE NORTH 11C1 "51!1'36" 'M:Sl IJ.ONO "IHE S00"TH LN: or SAID LOT 5, 1.113.0'I FEET 1tl "IHE Yll.5lOIL"r I.H C'S SAi[) NORlllERtl PAcn:: RALROIID R!Gt!T-or-Wil.Y'; TlOIOE NORTH 2S1'4-4'S4" EAST 849.8:Z FEE"T lil.!INQ SM'.l RIGHT-OF-WAY l.l<IE 1tl A POIKT -AFTER REFtRRW ro AS PONT /I;. lllENCE COPf1'lfJIIIC NOll"IH 29•44•54• EAST 200.0, fEET ro "IH£ lRUE ro,n Ill' ~ Clf n1E LINE HEREIN D£SCRll[I); ~ SClml ~ "28""50"' llEST 222.32 FEET W A POINT WHICH 9EM$ IIOR1H 59•24'5&" 'IIEST 100.01 FEET n!OU SAID PCIMT A; 1t£NCE NOR"IH 511 '24"51!1" WEST 10 THE llflfER NARBOR l.K ,oJIJ THE Dfll a'" S4lll l.l<IE OESCRIP'IIOH: .tJ..SO lllAT PORllCN Clf SAID 00',9N,1ENT LOT 5 l'IINC S001HEASlERLY Clf LNCE WASHNGTON BOU1£VARD. Y£5lERLY Clf SECCN>~ STATE HICtlWAY lfJN9ER 2A ,oJIJ NORlllYICSTEl'll..Y Clf THE RIGHT-C'S-Wi'IY rT PIJBUr:: STATE HMlHWAY NUUIIER I AS ESTABUSHED SY DEED R[ca!D(I) Jl,HJffft' 15, I-l,NIEJI RECORDIMC NO. 5&11740!!: NO EXCEPT ltlH POll'IION 11EAEDF cor.£YED TO 0TY OF" IIEN1CW, A WMOPM. CORPORATION BY DEED RECCflDEtl ,PJNE 10. ZOOB UHOER RECOIICINC NO. 200SIJ(llliOll1179. mu: REPOIIT RU£J:1DtCE: MS SUR',U W.-.S COEUCTED ACCORDltlG lO "IHE i:o;t;JIP110N SlfO'Mt, FURN1!HD BY AflST AMERICAN lln.E .. 5Ult...,.OE COMPAHV, COUl,ITUDIT NO. NCS-JII0710-WA1, TI.al REPORT, DATED DCCDIBER 14, 2008. 1HE EASDIDllS SH!l'IWED N'TER MS DATE Ml£ NOT 9tl!IWI OR KOTEO }£ff[!>!. lln.E ~ SC>IEllUl..E B EXCEPllONS: ITEMS CIRCUO -9t!MN CN MM'. l. RElMQl.ll9WOIT Clf All. EXISTlNO Al«> FU1U'lt RIGHTS ID UGlfT, ~ ,oJIJ fJR, mocntEA WTit "IHE RICtlTS CF ACCESS lO NO F"ROM THE STATE HIGHWAY o::tlS1'IUCTED 1>1 LANDS CON\£Y£0 8Y DOOJlolOCT IN FA\ICR CE" 1HE STATE OF" WIISHMGT(»I: IIECOROEll: OCl09fR 18, 1~1 IIECCROING 110.: <1178247 © i:.o.50,IENl, nta..UOIHG 1"ER"'S ,oJIJ ~ CONTAND Tll[ltEJN: RCOOROINC IMF"ORMATION: UAROt 20, 19113 UNDER RECORDfG NO. 5511289& l'I FAYOR Of: Pl,.G;l SIOlN) POWER M«) UONT CCMPAMY, A caa'O'!A'IION, ITS SUCCESSORS NE IISSIGNS FOR: PO'IIER UNf'. AFFEClS: THE NClfflfWESlDILY POflllOH CF "IHE PIIOPl1!TY NERElN OCSCRl8ED WESTERLY OF RAILROAD FIIGNT-OF-WAY @ El&:MOIT, INCWCHNG T[ll;MS NO ~ CONTAIIID lHEREN: RECU!DIHC IHfORIIIATICN: NOYDall 20, 19&4 UHOEJI RECORDING NO. 5814320 "' fAYOR a': .,.._AUTY CF MEmOP(UT.YI !VITTl..E. ITS """""" -"""' fOR: U1lUTY c.+.sEIEtT AFT£CTS:. 1HE NORTHEASn'RL Y PORTICW CF 1ME FmlP£RTY HE1EN DESCRIBED 'IIESTERl Y Of R.IJLROAD RIGHT-Clf-Wi'IY 7. CXMNAMTS, CCtlDmONS. RES~ AMO/CIR EASEt,8llS: 11:!'.IXR!lm: .,I.LY 111, 1975 RCOORCMNC HO.: 7:lll7l805Jfl @ EASEMENT. IIIClUOMG TERMS AMO Pl!IMSIOlfS OONTANJI 1KEREIH:: RECORDING ~ATION: .U.Y 7, 19!!0 utlDDI REOORIING NO. l!I007l170459 IN FAYOII Of: CITY C'S RDllON. A Wl92'.IJ.. CORf'ORAllOII F'Olt: PIJBU(: uruie {INCUIOftG Wil.TER AHJ SE'llf:R) AFFECTS: PO!lllON OF" THE Pl!OPERTY HEREIN DCSCRIIIOl 'l£STERl. Y AMO AOJACEHl TO RM.ROAD FIIGNT-OF"-WAY 9 SUBJECT TO "IHE TI»,IS OF" T\fE ,UIIT ~ ACftEDolEHT IIE1'll(D,I PUl.£T lllol!ER COIFANY AMO Al.llND PROPERTIES It&, DATEO 1./NE 15,. 1971, NilEN()r,IE)IT 11iERl'.TO DATED SEP1BIB£R 12, lttl(I, IIOlH N'PEAAIMO IH)OI RCCCROING NO. 810Z1II0531 R[COROEl) FIBRIJA!ff 10. 11181. Acc:alOING TO RCCIT.IJ.. OH EASD,IENT i.Mibt ltECOROftG NO. VII021~ REOJftOED FIBRUARY 15, 1998; J.H, DAICTD: a co., CH.l'OIIMA IJl,lllED P-N'f'£ARS TO HA"v'E SUCCEEOED PIJGET lMIER COMPANV, A ,UIIT ',O!Tlll!Dl. AU. NIENlllilEMTS TO SAICI JOIKT "v'EN1U'l:E ~T Ill/ST 11£ SU8MITl(D PIOOR Tll Cl..OSINC lO 0CTUMNC THE CURRENT SOIA"TmfS. ® EASEMENT. IHCWOMG 1"ER"'S AMO ""°"'5lOltS OONTANJI TJIER£JH: REC0R0H; INF"ORMATICH: f"EBRIIIIRY 1S, 1996 l.NllfR R[c:ol!DI«; NO. IM!021(1()889 N FA\ICR Of: IIAf&E Ill!. CO~ INC., A W~ CORPORA"IIOH, NE .I.it. BAXTER a OO~ A CALFOINA l.UTEO ·-FOR; IIOADWAY NfD UTI.JTES AFFECTS:. 11-£ EAST &O FEET ADJACENT 10 'f£S1 Iii,._ OF" RM.ROAi) IIICHT-CF-WAY 11. ll£ nRMS HID PR1)Yl5l(JW-; CUITAIIID It Tl-£ OOCIJl,IDIT Ellll1UD "I.AND CORNER ~· M:COl!OEO UAY 29, 19117 "5 RECOl!DING NO. 170529Dl!l38 OF" CFflCl.tJ. RECORDS. 12.~~NO~~~~i~=~.::. 2000020VDOQ005,. RECORDED N WI.JAi[ 135 or SUll"v'EYS, AT PACE(S) 1711, N KING CCUNTY, WASttlNGlt"IN. AUDITOR OR RECORDER'S CERTIACAlE riled lor record this __ doy of ___ , 20_ot __ " in Book __ of S'1rveys at poge ___ ot the request of BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. COUN I Y AUDITOR OR DIVISION OF RECORDS & ELECTIONS Counly Auditor or Superintendent of Records SW 1/4 SE.CT16N 29, T24N, R5E., W.M. @EASEUEJIT, NOJ.JOING lERMS M«) PllffillSICNS OONTMIE!l THE1l£J,I: ADDRESSES: ~ N'DRNA'IIOH: SEPTEMIER :Z. ZOOll UJllER RECOIIDf,l(l == Pl!(F[R1lES. INC. AMO J.N. NO. 200ll090200117ll OAICTER a co. an OF" REMTOK, A ILNCIPIJ. OORPOR,\"IION. ns ATTN.· ROBERT ~ SUOOESSORS AIIO ASSOIS 1100 S. THIRD SlREET .. fAYORClf: fOR: SANITARY SOIER UTIJ11ES ""° U1IJTY Pf'llMES R£N10K. WA 9l!I007 AFFC~ AS DESCRl8Ell TlfERO,I @PRIVATE A00ESS lO SAID PRDEES IS ACROSS A RAl..ltOAO mfr-CF-WAY. llllS CXU'AHY '1111..1. REWIRE "!HAT 1ME "F'RIVAT[ ROADWAY AMO CROSStlll AQREEM£KT', AMO Nf'f ASSl!lMEfT$ CR lilaJlflCA llONS lHEREOf '11«11 IElE ISSUEl BY ltlE R.IJlROAO COUPNf'f, BE SUIIMlntD FOR EJW,IICATICW. lllE ~oltllE~~'=,.O::~~S~>.OOESS ""°"1SIONS AS CONTMIIED -· F NO "A<lRWIIEHl" EXJSlS, "IHE FORTH~ POUC"l'{Cs) WU. CONTotJN M f"OW}WNO EllOEP'IICH: 1HE LACK OF" RIGfl" CF AOOESS 10 AMO FROM 1ME UJE ACINJ5S A RAI..ROIIO RIGHT-Clf-W,-1,Y. 15.. ANY (KDllON AS Tll "IHE '!RUE l.OCA~ OF" lt£ LATERAL IKll.M)AAIES Of THE SAID:iHla.ASS~ 1f. RIGHT OF" lHE STATE OF ~ 1N AMO 1t1 lHAT PORTION. F AN~, Clf 1ME P1ICffRTY ..-DESalBED 'MICH LIES BELOW nlE LINE or ORblHARY IIGH WA"IEROf"I...IJ([W-CTl»I. 17. l!IGIITS OF" 1ME !lEJEW.. PUEl.lC TO 1HE ~ USE Clf AU. 1llE WA"!ERS Of A NAYIGA8l.E BODY Clf Wil.TER NOT (H.Y FU! THE -ARY F'tff'OSE Of HA"9G.o.11CH, lltlT Al5IO FOR COll(ll.lMY P1.1RP05ES; tlllllOING (lltll NOT Ut,ITEO Tll) nst1NG. BOAlNC, OA"TMMG,. ~ WATER 9CIING ANO OllfER REI.ATEO RECREA"llO'IAL PVRP0SU. AS lHOSE WAlER'S UAY AFFECT M llOEl.NIOS. SH(lllE1.Ml;IS CR ~ UPLNt0S M«) "M£lHER TH[ l£\n. or TI£ WATER HAS 11ED1 RAI§]) NAlURAU.Y CR ARlFIGIAl.LY ro A UMITIIIEl CR FLUCTUA"ll'f(l lE\€1., AU. JoS FURTHER OCF1NED 81 TI£ OEOSIONAL LAW OF" lHIS STATE. {NTEClS All. Clf THC PRDISES !MIJECT TO SI.IQ{ 5UIIIEIICDICE) Ill. lfRll5, CONllfflOHS, ~ NE STFULATICNS Of 11£ JOlfT VENTURE Mlll!DIENT Clf atJENIIAU. TERU1NALS. A 'II~ JONT •,Ont.IRE. A CO"Y OF" 1"E OJRl'IO(T A!.MEEMENT ANll ~ NilEN()r,IE)ITS IIUST BE SUBUITim l!BlQll....m il.ll5I& IUfY <XMCYNICIE CR DICIMIIIJrHCE Clf TIIE JCINT 'oOITLH: ~TY 1,11.JST 11£ EXEWTECI IIY All. Clf THE J0NT \£Nl\J!ER. 19. TTTl.E: ro 1/EST "' AM INCOl,ll,IC <WINER WHOSE l'lANt IS NOT DISC:I..OlE). WCli IWolE WST BE F1.AISHED TO US 90 11-IAT A NAIE SEAROi UAY BE IMO£. 20. THE 1tMIS NE -catTME> IN THE OOCIJl,IEKT Ellllll.EO "Cla4MICE r.<>. 5483" RECOR!lal AUI.\JST 10. 2009 AS 2()()9(18100011194 Clf orFICIAI. """"" 21. llNR£C(ROfD LEASEHCUIS, I' ANY. RIQflS CF VEMIORS AND Sf.cutm' .o.GIIEDIDIT ON PERSOI..,_ PR0PBUY »Q RIGH1S OF" TENANTS, ANO SECURED PNIT£S lO RD,10'/E llfAOC F1XTURES AT -n£ EXJ>IRAnotl OF lt£ TERM. ARE.-, T"8LE PARCEL AAEA AREA OF lOTAL PARCEL 1,375.165 SQ. FT PER LEGAL OFSc:RIPTION OR J1.5694 AC LOT 1 50,82J SO. f I OR 1.1667 AC LOT 2 75.548 SQ. FT OR 1.7J4J AC. LOT J BJ,B1 9 SO. Ff. OR 1 9242 AC LOT 4 146,774 so. fl. OR J.3818 AC. LOT 5 71B,794 so. r r. OR 5.0228 AC LOT 6 109,485 SQ. FT. OR 2.51:H AC. LOT 7 50,725 SQ. FT. OR 1.1645 AC. PRIVAT( ST. 0 15.52A SQ. FT. OR 0 . .3442 AC PRIVATE ST E 12.6J6 SO. FT. OR 0.2901 AC PUl3LIC STREETS 161,,'4.:5 SO. Fl. A.8ANDC OR 3. /016 AC. PrRTlON OF fOTAL <149,7B9 SO. FT. PARCEL LYING 'MTl·HN DR 10 3257 AC LAKE WASHINGTON NOT[S: -LOTS 1 ANO 6 ARE BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY THE SHOR[ Of LAKE WASHINGTON, SHOWN AS 111[ 0 0Hv.M" (ORDINAR'l" HIGII WATER t.lARK). ··4.3,B33 SO FT OF LOT 1 LIES V/ITI11N THE 100· SHORELINE SETBACK. -106.70J SQ FT OF LOT 6 LIES \111Tl·HN THE ,oo· SHORELINE SETBACK. su~s CERTIF1CAlE ~, CEJflUIIY PACFIC. LP. ATTN: CA1F1EJ. W.THEWSOK 120\ 3RD A-.iE. SUITE 1680 SEATllE. WA n101 I.JCOfB LANO &lll'oOUR: i,.JSH. ROED AMO 11110DIGS. IMC. ATTN: OAKtl A. BEl..l. 200II -!R A'IOIJC EAST SEA TllE. WA ~lo.' """"" ICPFI' OCINSUl. llNG DQUl!S ATTN: TOM JONES 1!501 FFnt A'>91UE. 9.IITE 1800 !VITTU. WA 1111101 "" """"' -4350 LAKE WA991GTl»I BOIJI..EYAAO REHTOK, WASHNOlO'I TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 292405-!IOll.2--0~ HOAIZffiT.IJ.. OA1\At. Noll! 83/$1; CITY OF" REll'IQ<t -..iuENl$ !iiC1Wt HEREON IIIERE \G11l) IN OCTalEJI 1IHKI U!ING A WU) TC\0000 ~ lHf;WWIE, SERIAL NUMER 3371110. K1NNG »Q 9E1BACKS: K1NNG : COl,l,IEIICIAL/ofl'10E/RETAL S£18ACKS, llElERWO 11-lcuctt SITE IJE\EID'MENT Pl.NI RE'IIEW. PER CITY OF~ IIUNCIPAL C00E 4-2-1208. QfQWTION· KNOW AU. PEOPLE DY THESE PRES(NTS THAT 'M:. n£ tJl,DERSIGNEtl Cll'NRS Clf INTEREST IN 11£ UN> -D£5allllED MAKE A allllll+(I SITE Pl.AN PURSUNff 10 CHAPTER 511.17 R.C.'11. ANO DEa..ARE 1HE 8NllllC SITE Pl.AM W BE A CIIN'I«:: R[PRElDCTAllON Of n£ 5""IE ANO lHAT S...., Bt!DINO SITE Pl.AH IS IIADE "Mll-1 FREE CCl<I-T AMO IN ACCORO.t.NCE "MlllTEH otSIRE CE" THE """"' IN WllNESS 'NHEREOf YtE SET HANDS AND SEALS; CENtuRY PACflC, LP. " oATE APfflOVAl 5; QTY CF RENTON ADMINISTRATOR Of" Pl.ANNING / BUILDING / PUBLIC 'MJRKS £)(-El) AND APPRO>,m PER RCW 58.17.1!50 {1) 1HS ~y OF 20_ ADMHSTIIA "Rll!.. CfTY OF" IIDl'!CN KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT Of" ASSESSMENTS EXNolNEll AHO APPRO\€D lHS __.DAY CF 20_ KlNQ CCUNlY ASSESSOR DEPUTY l(tffi; COllNT'f A~ KING COUNTY FlNANCE Dl~SION CERTIF1CAT10N I t1EARBY CER"!IFY 1\IAT All. Pl!OPRTY TAXES ARE PAID. lHAT lHtRE ARE NO OElMQIJ£NT SP£OAL ~TS CERTTIED lO THIS OFTICE FU! Ctl.LECllON ..... 0 "!HAT AU. SPECIIJ. ASSESSMEHTS CER1'flEO 1t1 lHS ~ roll CQJ.ECTKlM ON AMY Of 1llE PROfC"RTY l-£REIN CONTAINED DEDICATED AS ~ ALl..EYS CR ANY OlHER PI.Q.IC USE, ARE PAI> II flAL lHIS __DAY Clf 21!_ lllRECTtll, lllNC COUNTY Qff1C[ OF" flNANCE WASHINr.TON -WAS!-IINCTON ecw DEPUTY DIRECi'oil, l(ll,IG COUNTY aTICE or F1NAfKi: """"""' 1. R[COR!) Of 5UR\£Y R[CCIR0£0 llNllEII IIECOl!Olltc NJleER 2000020ll90000!5, R£<XROS Of Kf<IC COUNTY, STATE OF" W"911NCTOK. C_QNTROL DIAGRAM 1"=1000' E 1/<I SEC. 211 FD 3/IJ" IIROIZE P1.11C AND PUNai N COit. POST. DN. 0.15' IN CASE AT IHT. OF SE 7:i!N) ST, I: 1161M AVE. SE 5W i/4 SEC'IION 29. 124N.45E cc11n. LOT 5 NW 1/4 SECTION J2. 124N.45E COV"T. lOT 1 r-~m.si E•IXlll404.3807 S( 1/4 SECTION 2g. T24N.4::.lc. S£ ()OR. SEC. 29 ~I ' ' FD J 1/2" ~ DISC W/ 1'1.NOi l>I ca«:. ::: WCDN~l~~~ SE 80llt ST. le 1161H ol ~~SE ~· N•1"6ll9.1111 ~-150&380.&0II _ ! -., N88"H"06"W ?61J.21" FO J/15" 9!0NZE PU.IG N«I PllMCH IN CONC. POST. ON. o..,• tt CASE. SE CORtfEll OOv'T. LOT _, f-~744.J~ E-1303747.91!1114 BINDING SITE PLAN -QUENDALL TERMINALS CENTURY PACIFIC, L.P. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON This mop correctly represents o survey mode by me or '1nder my direction in conformance with the requirements of lhe Survey Recording Act ot the request of CENlUR"\'" PACl[:]C, LP. in 20 I! BUSH~.~R~O~E~D-&.,....H~l~TC~H~l~N~GS~.~IN~C~. DRAWN BY Lf.!K/TRSI DATE: 01/11/16 IJOB # 2009050.04 Cer\ifico le-· No. 37546 EXHIBIT 5 CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVE"\'"ORS ZOOII MINOR A\'OIUE: rAST SEA nu. "'A9""GTOH ;8)0,2-J~D ,~W /§?.::~;.: rAXI (200) iz,-71~5 CIIECKED B'l" DAB SCALE: NA SHEET 1 OF 5 ~ i ; ' I I 0 .....s ... 11-.. i T ( DI JUI' ) llDob•lOOft. j !/# .. TAX N:X:f. NO. - S'II 1/4 SECTION 29. T24N,4SE COll'T I.OT 5 N'/I 1/4 SECTION 32, T24N,40£ GIY/T LOI 1 // PLAT ~ BARBEE 141. VOL 24'J, PGS. 25--311, REC. MO. 20080208000182 1/1 S~. ~-I ' I ' h1'/il. ACCT. NO.' / 2"2405t01201 '4N, t~Sc w.-M-.---GOVT LOI 4 ---------------------- '"'"'" "" """"' = "" u Nl4"41'o,nr , .... ~ l2 MM14e-'50"W ,m ~ Ll NM'48'M"'W .... C L4 Nl!llr49'?!8"w '~"' ~ l5 Nlllr48'Sl!"W ~"' " ~ N311'!14'10"E 1UJ' .. GOii'! LOI 5 L7 NS9'0J'«"W '·"' CT ~ """"'" 18.85' .. / II BUSH-,~R-O_E_O~&~-H-IT_C_H_I_N_G_S_,~IN-C~. CIVIL ENGINEERS &: LAND SURVEYORS 2009 Ml-A\IENUE EAST !Ll\!1U, liA~NCTOH 98102-35\3 (2015) 323-41 ... l-!I00-935-0506 r~~, (200) J23-1135 """"'" -"·"' ..... "·"' "·"' ,..,. ..... ..... "·"' =" 24"22'3'11" _,r ..,r,,-= .... 17"11'40" MW<>r 108'14.,l,8" 5'5T5J" = "·" 70.10' ,,. .. 23.41' .... ""' tUI' ... I I ; I I I © 0/H POWERUtfE (ASMENT "Al.ONC EASTER!. Y Mil.RGIN Of'" PROPERTY" • REC. NO. 55621198 @ ~0' ROAO'IIAl' & UTl.lTT E,1,SM£NT, REC. NO. 96021 ~9 . ,,,------. I _,./"' . I / ri -. I . I I I C.O.R. 1'843 ) ---A J_ --v-= BOUNDARY INFORMATION BINDING SITE PLAN -QUENDALL TERMINALS CENTURY PACIFIC, L.P. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON DRAWN BY l»K/TRS DATE: 01/11/16 JOB II 2009050.04 CHECKED BY DAB SCALE: 1" = 1 oo· I SHEET 2 OF 5 • \~~~ 0,'!,,'t ·~;,'v, ~.,:,, ·"' "~ ~- LEGEND -~-ELO'IIOfT VALi/i: "" -~ ¢ -= = taflUt (F CttANNEI.. """ ~ rm -= " n£ClRICAI. OOCT --- " CT "' -i ' ~ _, • SW 1/4 SECf16N 29, T:?4N, RSE, W.M. ELEClRICAL VAl.ll.T l!!I .AINC110H 90X El..EC'IRICALlRANSRlRWEJl =--Fl11NP Rt* ROD #>ID CN' """ -FIRE lfYCIII.U.T OAS VAi.iii: "'""' --w,"""" ~ o.£VA11CN Oft! E/r ~ -~, ~, ~ 00 ~ -@ ~ """'® O'o£RHE,\I) D£C'TRIC/m-El'IIOII~ ~= ~ P<1.[ •I UGHT PAINlEll U1UT'I' I.OCATION !IIEOOAO IJll.lTY loc.l. TION SNl'IARY 9'.'ll(R a..EAMCIUT SANITARY SE'IIER SANITARY SE'IIEI IU.Nl+OlE -~~ Sla!t,I OR-IAANIKl..E " --· • lfUPHlllE SEN1RY BOX " lOS'l-fCt€ VAUlT ,., _,...,, "' TOP ruv.i.TJCN I WAlEII liE1ER WAlUI MNolHCU: • ~=-w WAlER VAULT WAlER VALVE DATE (I' TOPOGRN'HC t,llrf'PING RUD~ ..IJN£, 2009 o" \ ED(P) \ G(P) ~A7't'(Pj \ •¢ H ,,. ·= ~~i~ '-'·"'"' 15.... '-t "'i, • i..~ .... I • I O"DIP W(P) : ~ '{ I , I ----"ic~ ·-<,"'-. . I --• '<>:I;~ \ I .· ---I -,.,., . .,.,, ~'?-,,_. .. --, ---I \ ~~ 0 12"SS(RJ I _ --O O I . .· \<> -, .. . I ~ _ _ I ,,. oe i(,i ii, I e'l\; ------\ : I 'o\-, I ,;..,:. • \ I I r,e. r,{I, \ I , I "i;_ ~-, I "• \~ "'.:\ I ~ ~ I ·-;,~~ \ I _g Ofip -~ ~ i" 12• l)lp Wl,P) 8 } ' ... S4"MURO SE\\'ER(R) \<o 'l $ i\ " \ \ ~§ \ I \ : '\· '-m(P) : I ; \ ------'----'-~-- ~~ ~ BfAt RIGHT OF WAY I L------------------ c¢:'\ '.-,:<?J. -_,, -------- m(e) 0 \ 0/HT I ~w -<-• " -- O; " ' -- \1_ ' 6'.. DIP JY(!?J j 6 • 'ii1P \M;R) _ . -- •m "'"' ~'! -L'ID. of" ---- MARl<ER~ , _ _ -.- E&c"l -LAICE ----'\--------\ ---.. \ --------..c_.._ -------------~-------------- &, ~~'t,'ti_ ------------»,;, --- \ ,..~ ~ ---......___ ' .CAN{P) ,.,,,_--lll 't> 1.! i;·p~ ~"J ' _, \~. y o/'<1 u,1 -~'t, ~~za,~ "~<t, ~ ~-~ --i r/ r i CI:]I __ ( Ill' PIIBI') I IDch -eo n, ¢ G(") • ---EXISTING UTILITIES I BINDING SITE PLAN ~ QUENDALL TERMINALS CENTURY PACIFIC, LP. C1TY OF RENlON, KING COUNTY, SlATE OF WASHINGTON BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS&: LAND SURVEYORS DRA'M',1 BY U.!K/TRS DATE: 01/11/16 JOB# 2009050.04 2009 Mlf!OR A'9l!J£ ~AST 5»1n.E •.. ~-=- !18102 ,)!;IJ ,!~J~?=~ r,..,, c2o,;) J2J-11Js CHECKED BY DAB SCALE: 1" = 20' !SHEET 3 OF 5 ~ ~ a "' T ' -a > ~ '" . .Jtl(P) "'" l'E:•26.871:l! ;S::-'·fi!k 11¢~ ~f? ,.,,,.,Q, h -~ ru:c1111e . ..,_ 91 """ "' " _i ~~l;wi74 S[C iiON 29, T24t-i.° R'.lL, w' 12"SS(II) • BNRR RIGHT CF WAY "''' -------------------------------- 0-.i'H T --,;· . . .. , ............ "'"· "-. . -o/H -r::::;._,_. lf',6(1"} ~ .. "" ' ll"SS(R) ,,. $ ro ,; 'v lU(P) ___ T_ _______ _ ' ~ !!! a "' ~-C -6" DIP W(R) ~ o,1J 'Ea:r. 1Nl£T Tt•41.28 l.NCE WASHlfGTON a..w. _L- ------_ ---_ ---_"=-=............._ -------::iu. Of 01111) ---------------------------------------- " _, G(P) l:ll r~t;li'T£-.. f..,_11e llcit q,) ~--i DI_ -- • i i i ( llUDr) I !Doll • 20 ft. G(P) /"1.£1" TF~39.9J (to"mmc.o.i. IP/ l!:I / i .0/1, __ E~T." "'' SHEET LAYOUT I BUSH~.~R~O~E~D-&.,-,H~l~TC~H~l~N~G~S,---;-;IN~C~. CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 200P IIINOO A.rnuE £AST 51:ATII..!:, WJ,SHOOTOH Q!!l02-">B (2Dfi) 32:5-4144 1-II00-9"-050!I FAXf (200} J2.J-7l~ G(P) ,- EXISTING UTILITIES BINDING Sil£ PLAN -OUENDALL TERMINALS CENTURY PACIFIC, LP. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON DRAWN BY U~K/TRS OAT[: 01/11/16 JOG# 2009050.04 CHECKED BY DAB SCAI F: 1" = 20' )SHEET 4 OF 5 ffl !l! 1:1 -I ... SW 1/4 SECTION 29, 124N, R5E, W.M. ---------~---------~------~----------------· T "' • of • { ' f/0 MAAKER'y § "' SHEET LAYOUT [J \Do qi DO ~ ~ a • " ea D, "' ~ 0/IH 12" DIP W(P) ·~O~ J::r . "' \ . ,,.,,,, • t2" ml' 'ft(P) ~ BNRR RIGHT rE WAY JO(O) ~" ~~.~"'-' ... ~v (J,~~ ~~ ~q,0-;l .. Q,~~~ 1'> i ,,:.,"iJ,. I 9, ~~"'<&o -1-~~ ,~ \ c§ _c;f -"' lll(P) 'y > /0 YARKER o~'ih. ~ •. · ,.~ ~'f:o 84"METRO -------0 -----------r---------------------"------~ ------~-,,, o_rn T lit ~· • rn(P) [![I -- S•J OI"> ~ • o,>;, '-l 0 G(P) 1,,r, ~ G(P) LAKE -IUD, _J. ,;1',•,.J -" 0 ,~-'{. ~ -----------------------------~----------------~------------------------ «•J 0/f1 E&T E-lit;~ O/f1 E&T / k.--~ La.. i i i j ( DI" P'DI' ) l lllah -Iii) ft. ' C ~ BUSH~.~R~O~E~D~&~H~IT~C~Hl~N~G~S-, ~IN~C~. OVIL ENGINEERS &. LAND SURVEYORS 2009 MINO,, AV!:~U!: EAST 5E~Tll..E, WA~>IGTON 911102-J~U (208) 323--41« 1-600-9.JS-0508 fAXf (206) JiJ-'1J~ 0/H E EXISTING UTILlllES BINDING SITE PLAN -QUENDALL TERMINALS CENTURY PACIFIC, LP. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON DRAWN BY LMK/IBS DATE: 01/11/16 JOB # 2009050.04 CHECKED BY DAB SCALE: 1" = 20' I SHEET 5 OF 5 HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON P.S. 1221 Second Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle. WA 98101-2925 Telephone: (206) 623-1745 CITY OF RENTON FEB 1820!6 Fax: (206) 623-7789 tJ.'09 RECEIVED ., /,lM CJTY CLERK'S OFFICE {1 1 { A ttomeys for Applicant Century Pacific, LL.LP. flthi/ /tf,rt /~cl CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER ln re: i QUENDALL TERMINALS FEIS AND I MITIGATION DOCUMENT. SEPA APPEAW Project No. LUA09-15 l JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL I. STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between tht: parties hereto that the above- entitled cause. having been fully settled and compromised, may be dismissed with prejudice through entry of the subjoined Order of Dismissal. v.ith each party to bear its own costs. DATED this ~y of February, 2016. HILLIS C~ARK MARTIN & P,ETERSON P .S. By fil4t 11,( · ~~ Amit D. Ranade, WSB #34878 AnnM.Gygi, WSBA#l9912 Attorneys for Applicant Century Pacific, LL.LP. ;~;:: __ _ 'lry~ II. ORDER OF DISMISSAL Tl !IS MA TIER came before the Renton Hearing Examiner on the foregoing Stipulation of the parties. Based on the foregoing Stipulation, the Renton Hearing Examiner JOINT STIPlflATJON AND PROPOSED ORDER DISMISSING AP Pf.Ai, WITH PRF..JUDICE -I HILUS CL\RK MARTIN & PETERSON P.S. 1221 Second Avenue. Suite 500 Seattle. WA 98101-2925 Telephone: (206) 623,1745 Fa,: (206) 623-7789 EXHIBIT 6 hereby ORDERS. ADJUDGES. and DECREES that the appeal ofQucndall Terminals Project LCA09-l 5 l and all claims alleged by the parties arc hereby DISMISSED W!TH PREJUDICE, and each party .wili bear its own costs. ( Presented by: HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON P.S. By lhi.t,t ;/{ · /,:l Amit D. Ranade, WS A #34878 AnnM.Gygi, WSBA#l9912 Attorneys for Applicant Century Pacific, LL.LP. SOUTH END GIVES BACK ~ ~ JOINT S'/f PULAT!ON AND PROPOSED ORDER Dl.'J.WISSING APPEAL WITH /'REJUD/CE -2 . 2016. HILLIS Cl.ARK MARIi!' & PETERSO~ P.S. 1221 Second Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98101-2925 Telephone: (206) 623-1745 Fa" (206) 623-7739 Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Staff, Phil Olbrechts <olbrechtslaw@gmail.com> Monday, February 22, 2016 9:59 PM brad nicholson ann.gygi@hcmp.com; cmathewson@centurypacificlp.com; Jason Seth; Vanessa Dolbee; Cynthia Moya; Larry Warren Re: Renton -Quendall Homes (LUA-09-151) Follow up Flagged This will be the last addition to the email string regarding the FEIS appeaL As requested before, please have five copies ready for the hearing should anyone need to see these emails when I disclose these ex parte contacts with Mr. Nicholson, Mr. Nicholson, I would normally not further complicate the record of this case by further communications with you, but it appears that there is some major misunderstanding or miscommunication going on and I want to take one last attempt at rectifying iL I wish I could just talk to you about this, but as the decision maker my ability to communicate with you is very limited due to the reasons identified in my first email to you. Ultimately, however, this will have to be our last communication regarding your appeal unless you plan on making some motion that you entered into the stipulated dismissal order due to some form of fraud or misrepresentation. Any other fmther information you want me to consider should be sent exclusively to the planning staff as comment on the application, As I identified in my first email to you, l don't become involved in an appeal until it's time to consider whether a prehearing conference or email exchange is in order. This usually occurs four to six weeks prior to the scheduled appeal date, In this case you would likely have received an email from me to all appeal parties inquiring whether the parties wanted to resolve some prehearing procedural issues or othe1wise desired a prehearing order outlining hearing procedures, A request for such a prehearing order is usually initiated by one of the appeal parties, but l will often initiate that inquiry on my own if no one beats me to it I will also address any proposed orders or prehearing motions when they come in, Beyond this, planning and city clerk staff are responsible for processing an appeaL The role of City staff and myself does not change because you've persuaded staff to send me your notice of appeal earlier than the completion of the staff report, I'm not sure what type of response you were looking for from your appeal statement If you just wanted an acknowledgement that your appeal had been filed, then staff would be responsible for that. ff they don't issue some sort of acknowledgment as a matter of course, I'm sure they would provide you with something upon request If you had any questions about how the appeal would be processed or scheduled, all you had to do was ask staff If you disagreed with how staff was handling some preheafing procedural issue regarding your appeal, you were free to either file a motion with myself ahead of time or to raise the issue at the hearing, If you had made a legally compelling argument that consolidation should not have occured during your appeal hearing, I would not have had any problem segregating out your appeal (although for future reference, the SEPA rnles requiring consolidation are fairly clear and I've yet to come across any argument to the contrary). If you are upset because l didn't tead your appeal months prior to the appeal hearing, there is no reason to be. There's nothing I could have done with any knowledge I would have gained from reading your appeal months in advance. Reading appeal statements too far in advance (especially those exceeding the more typical lO pages and under) can be a tremendous waste of time since the appeal can easily he narrowed or even withdrawn over time and also because I will have to re-read everything once the hearing date is close. Excluding any prchearing motions or orders that may be presented to me, 1 only need to know about the details of your appeal in lime for the hearing on your appeal. For the stipulated motion to dismiss, !just needed documentation establishing what hearing parties should be included in the order, and I got that information when you pointed out that your notice of appeal had been emailed to me months earlier. If you had not agreed lo have your appeal dismissed, I would have read your entire notice of appeal prior to the hearing and 1 would have gone through it with a fine toothed comb after the hearing as I prepared my decision. It's entirely possible that you would not have liked the result of my decision on your appeal, but I can assure you that you would not have been able to sincerely assert that your issues had nol been thoroughly reviewed and addressed. Once the hearing on Quendall is over and t.he appeal period has expired I will be happy to discuss this with you further (assuming the discussion doesn't relate to some other pending appeal or application). Also, if it wasn't clear to staff before, it is appropriate for staff to recommend to the parties of an appeal that they request some sort of prehcaring conference or email exchange from me if the appeal parties have procedural questions about the conduct of a hearing. For appeal parties represented by attorneys (which has usually been the case), there isn't much confusion about how to participate. For unrepresented citizens, however, I'm sure there's room for improvement as to how to make hearing participants comfortable with the process. Land use appeals in Renton are rare, especially when they involve unrepresented parties. On Mon, Feb 22, 20 l 6 at I :48 P::VI, brad nicholson <brad827@hotmail.com> wrote: your Honor, Well I want to apologize but well it took 5 months to get a response? the appeal notice i.e 'The facts are dispositive" while it took 24 hours to respond to the PRP's I am just wondering do you need to have the EPA sign off on the case too? It could he Cami Grandinetti. Respectfully Brad Nicholson From: LWarren@Rcntonwa.gov To: Qlbr~chtslaw@unrnil.con1; bradS2 7 fiiJhotrnaij.com; c:v!oya@Rentonwa.gov; VDo!bee@Rcntonwa.gov; JScth@Renlonwa.gov; cmaJJ1C\','~Q,n@'centurvpaci h,;:Jp,com; ann, gvcr.i@h~JDP,~9111 Subject: RE: Renton -Qucndall Homes rLC i\-09-i 5 l l Dale: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 16:38:55 +0000 Mr. Olbrechts, the city has no objection to the stipulated order. If you have any questions, please let me know, From: Phil Olbrechts [mailto:olbrechtslaw,;illgmaiLcom] Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 7:44 AM To: brad nicholson; Cynthia Moya; Vanessa Dolbee; Larry Warren; Jason Seth; cmathewson(Crcenturypacificlo.com; 2 ann.gygi@hcmg.com Subject: Re: Renton -Quendall Homes (LUA-09-151) All Appellants, The proposed stipulated order is missing one of the parties to the appeal. As outlined in RMC 4-8-11 O(E)(7), the City is a party to the appeal. I will sign the stipulated order if I get email confirmation from the City that it has no objection to the stipulated order. Please note Mr. Nicholson has sent me another email, included in this email string, that was not cc'd to the other parties to the appeal. As before, I request that staff include this updated email string as one of their hearing exhibits. They should also have five copies of this email string available at the hearing so that I can disclose the ex parte communications with Mr. Nicholson and give the opportunity for the public to review and respond to those communications. In response to Mr. Nicholson's second email. as noted in my last email to him, l received a copy of his notice of appeal (all 200+ pages) as an email attachment from the City Clerk's Office last September. Other than a response from staff as to whether they have an objection to the stipulated order, I ask that f receive no further communications from the parties on the appeal regarding the appeal. For the reasons outlined in my last email to Mr. Nichols, it is important that pre-hearing ex parte communications be limited as much as possible. On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 8:49 PM, brad nicholson <brad827@hotmail.com> wrote: Your Honor, I can recall with crystal clarity. 5 weeks after filing the appeal, I called the City Clerk and requested information about why I received no acknowledgement of its receipt or correspondence whatsoever. It would appear that [ have been involved in as many appeals in Renton as you have and in the past. the normal process has been to give a short explanation of what is going on. At first the Clerk told me that he had posted it on the web and that l would need to talk to Staff about it. l had complained to him that l had spent considerable time and had addressed the appeal to you and not to staff. My comment letter was addressed lo staff but my appeal notice along with $250.00 was addressed to you according to staff instructions. The Clerk then assured me in no uncertam terms that the appeal document went directly to you and that you had a copy of it in your possession. I complained to him that [ paid the fee for the appeal to go to you and not to staff. Thus lam surprised that you would indicate that you have no documents. I am also surprised that you did not get it and it was never in your possession. I am just saying that I had also been quite disturbed that staff had been rhc ones to decide on the appeal consolidation even though I think you are correct in presuming that it may have been generally known to be the case. But I had not understood that they had jurisdiction to decide issues of Law in a pending appeal. Respectfully 3 !3rad Nicholson Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 06:07:51 -0800 Subject: Re: Renton -Quendall Homes (LUA-09-151) From: olbrechtslaw@im1ail.com To: brad827@hotmail.com; CMoya@rentonwa.1mv: YDolbee@rentonwa.gov; LWarren@rentonwa.gov; J Seth@rentonwa.gov; cmathewson@centurvpaci fie Ip.com; ann.gygi@hcmp.com Staff, Please include this email string in the exhibits to the staff report on the Quendall Homes application. Mr. Nicholson, Thank you for the clarification of Quendall Homes. I will likely send out a signed order tomorrow once I've had an opportunity to review the filed notice of appeal. From your assertions that I may have "forgotten" information that you apparently believe I at one point knew or should have known about your project, it appears you might have some misunderstanding about my level of involvement in your case prior to hearing. By a combination of law and necessity. I'm essentially required to know as little about your project as possible until staff has completed its staff report and list of proposed hearing exhibits. By state statute and numerous court opinions I am not allowed to engage in conversations with staff, the applicant or any hearing party about the substantive merits of your case outside the hearing process. Because of these legal requirements, you can be assured that all of my knowledge about your case is strictly limited to the testimony presented during the pro_iect hearing and the exhibits admitted into evidence. This puts you on equal footing with all other hearing participants and ensures that you have the opportunity to address any evidence presented to me that you may believe to be inaccurate or incomplete. l;p until today my knowledge of your case had been limited to knowing it's big, controversial and involves a superfund site. The only reason I knew this much is because every few weeks I ask the planning manager if anything big is coming up, so thJt I may plan my schedule and workload in advance. Land use appeals (as opposed to applications) sometimes involve a little more advance information due to the necessity to sometimes hold prehcaring conferences. Prehearing conferences arc prchcaring meetings or email exchanges with appeal hearing participants designed to address procedurnl issues in advance in order to provide for a more effi;;icnt appeal hearing. Issues usually held at prehearing conferences typically include setr.ing limits on the time for testimony, requiring the parties to identify witnesses and exhibit,, and setting deadlines for prehcaring motions and briefing. If no party has specifically requested a prchcaring conference, I will typically ask for a copy of 4 the notice of appeal four to six weeks in advance of a scheduled appeal hearing to determine whether a prehearing conference would be useful. As best as I can recall, Renton has only had a couple land use appeal hearings in the last five years that I've worked with the city. Renton is unique amongst my thirteen hearing examiner clients in that it apparently regularly sends me a copy of the appeal statement before I ask for it and before the staff report is complete. There's nothing wrong with that practice, since it's fairly clear that the appeal statement will be included in the staffs exhibit list once the staff report is completed. However, it's not going to attract my notice until I get close to the appeal hearing and start considering the merits of a prehearing conference. From your email response yesterday I was able to find an email from the City Clerk's office from last September that contained an attachment of your appeal statement. That should give me the information I need to ensure that the stipulated order includes all necessary parties. Your email also asserts that I've forgotten about a consolidation order. It's fairly undisputed that state law requires an appeal of FEIS adequacy to be consolidated with the hearing on its underlying permit application. I would be surprised if staff found it necessary to ask me about consolidation. Also, as previously discussed, the circumstances under which staff can talk to me about a case are very limited outside the hearing process. I don't recall making any comments to staff regarding consolidation but if I did you are correct that I have forgotten about it. On Sun, Feb 21. 2016 at 12:30 AM, brad nicholson <brad827@hotmail.com> wrote: Your Honor, You may be looking for "Quendall Homes" according the previous email. The documents concern "Quendal! Terminals" EIS decision which you decided to consolidate with the Master plan hearing around 5 months ago. Vanessa Dolbee informed me that is was because of "Stmc Law'' You may have forgotten about it but the appeal documents were sent directly to you from the clerk Jason Seth. You may have also forgotten it was an appeal that was 288 pages against the adequacy of review where you be approving the Master Plan for around 700 houses next to the Seahawks training facility on the superfund site that will undergo cleanup after you take your actions? Respectfully. Brad Nicholson Date: Sat, 20 Feb 20 l 6 08:32:57 -0800 Subject: Re: Renton -Quendall Homes (LUA-09-151) From: olbrechtslaw@gmail.co1n 5 To: CMova@remonwa.,::ov CC: YDolbee~rcntonwa.~ov; L \Varren ([{1rcnt.onwa.s:ov; JScth(Q1 rent9_nwa.!c!ov; cm;ithewson@centurvpaci fie Ip.com: br:id8 'l7@hotmai Lcorn; ann. ~vgi@hemp.com Please confirm that all patties to the SEPA appeal have signed the stipulated order to dismiss. I have no documentation on the appeal, so I have no knowledge of what parties are involved. On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Cynthia Moya <C\1oya@rentonwa.gov> wrote: Mr. Olbrechls, We have just received a Joint Stipulation & Proposed Order Dismissing Appeal in the Qucndall Terminals FEIS & Mitigation Document, SEP A Appeal (File #LU A-09-l 5 l ). The parties have asked that you sign the attached document as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please feel free to call Vanessa at 425-430-7314. Thank you, Cindy ivloya, Records ~lanagcmcm Specialist City of Remon -Aclmini,trauvc Services/City Clerk Division c,nova (qi rcntonwa.gov :125-430-65 l 3 ----· .. --_____ :r .i ! •. 6 ' i i s! " '"'· =z -~=lOMJ.TD.Y.i.B-'CIIE / BEDEVE RA" .. U.fOR •r:rM.(WIIIDOORAND/DR I .. --~™'-"""~':'.:::"" / PURING. flN.ll.DESKl"1 DE\lllOPMENT //////// \-- \ \.., 'z- 'z-~L • • i ~ "o-~ ~ ~~ """"" ,,,.,,_ ~1t,IVGroN \~r~~ x\\~ SITE & BUILDING SUMMARY \ / .., \ '\ '?~ ~~~ ••w-=•="~ ~-\ SITE ll.'>OIMG 00R ~-~J !~/:l°lN OCCUPANCl' Tl'l'E: M I,"-' CONS~ lYPE, , .. W. SPRIMII.EREt> 111,11;< 9(Hl[ljll(l MOOIIT :l(l STORIES OR 126' TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNll5 AREA • SW 1 R~PBffiolL l5 Fl.0011$ & 71111111$) • 78.100d SW2RE!llDE1ffllllHl0011$&!1(1111111S)•88.DODol \ iSW~RE:llllll:JfflAll4fl0011$&6'VNnB)•lll-, \ SW 4 RE!!ODE"11AL {3 flOORS &42 UNmiJ • T8 :lOOo1 -1RES1DE111TlAL(5 FUIORS& 71UNITS)••.200II \\. ~ -2 RESIDEIIITlAl..(4 fl.OORS$,58UNITS)•8UOO,, \\. U 1 RESIDam,ll (HLOORS 1,821111"5! • 7$ iOOII \ ~••~-,,.-~,~~~>-N-\ ME l RE$1DUffiAl.(6 Fl.DOR$ & 82 UNITS)• 1B,iOOl'I ME2 RESIDNTU.l.(4 FI.OORS&7i UNITS)•79,20Dot 1i TOT..Cao,lD!NOAREAS•731.(lOOOI , T()TMR~NTMIU•91)(1Qo! '.): -t - 7D7ilRrTAILMIE#l•:I0,025sl' ' TOTAL PARKING AREA ' &W LOWER PARKING lEYEL • t.1!15,~ -LOWER PAAKING lEYEL • '1,SDO,,I' SE LOWER PARKING lEYEL • ll4,S70>I' . NE LOWER PAAll!NG LEYn • 78,,!!0lt 10nL UlWER PAAKIMG LEVn AREAS •367 ,3,40sl TOTAL ENCLOSED AREA-1,123,365sf S'TR~Cl'VIW. RESIDE>ffitd. l;(IIJf!TYAIIDS• 117.IIOOtl ~L Ol'EN PARKING DECM!I a 91 000:I ~ \ 9: ) C, -v. 0~ ~~ ~., ~ ,;,)C::,· ~ "Z- 9>~~t-\ '=; {II "°o- ) 0 I ~~~~~Qi. 1 //_.:.:---~ T\ \ ~2~" ~: POST DEVELOPMENT ACREAGES BUILT AREA (IMPERVIOUS AREA) BUILDING AREAS • BUILDING AREAS • 187.350sf PARKINIJ DECK AREAS" 59,ooo.f PARKING DECK LANDSCAPE AREAS• 25,00Cl9f COURlYARD PLAZAS• U7,600sf CDURlYARD MISC. DECKS• 4,0ltsl TOTAL BUILDING AREAS• 392.976"1 PAVED AREAS (R.O.W •• ROADS, PEDESTRIAN/BIKE PAn!SJ • STREET 'A', 'B' & 'C' AREAS• t9.250sf STREETS 'D' & 'E' AREAS• 23,522sf SIIJEWALK AREA• 60,800sl TOTAL PAYED AREAS• 183,57291 SURFACE PARKING AREAS• 89,000sl TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREAS• 665,54S.r PERV10US AREA l)ESllloNATED NATURAL/OPEN SPACE AREA• 140,331bl UNPAVED FIRE LANl;/PEDESTRIAN TRAIL• 19,970sl STREET LEVEL LANDSCAPED AREAS• 1S.300sf OTHER LANDSCAPED AREAS• 33,495sf LOT7 SATELLITE PROPl::RTY • 50.725sr TOTAL PERVIOUSAREAS • 259.B26sf UNIT SUMMARY SW RESIOBITIAL TOTAL UNITS• 257 NW RESIDENTIAL TOTAL UNITS• 127 SE RESIDENTIAL TOTAi. UNfTS • 154 NE RESIDENTIAL TOTAL UNITS" 154 TOTAL UNITS• 692 DECK PARKING: SE QUADRANT• 130 DEQI PARKING STALU NE QUADRANT• 39 DECK PARKING STALLS TOTAL AREA • 1,324,965sf LAND AREAS GROSS Sl!EAIIE#I • Hl5,37kl !1111\!ll,IJ. PLIBUC Cll'EM Sf'ACDc ;;,~,;·-·-·-,.-·---2+---~C-1"-&'P'E~' ·~·--• ~ '"'" "'""'"' -"''"'" --~-- ll"lf •11 .. PIATURAl-"'E#l5 IILOMl~O~W,4E"l!Wl.-140.33(W SIIORWNE !'ll!la LAN~l'EDESTRWI Tf1All19,970o'I' SlJII TD7AL • 160.JOPal DTHERAREAS:. 51RITT L£Vn. • U2,712111'(EXCWDE5 SIDEWAU\5 & L»IDSClll'Ej lANDSCAPE!) COURTYARll5 • 117.roo.! S1DEWALK5: j} ; LEGEND ~DUMPSTER/RECYCLE BIN lo:.!] UTILITY AND ELECTRICAL SPACE ~ EXIT STAIR H)EW/11.1\SIN!'VIIUCl'l'O.W •3&.eo,:,.J r,,snc~ 6' ~I>(!; L'"E SIDEWIIIJ"5WTl"PUIILICR:D.W.•Z4.ooo.1' l R NfWa'S:DfWAL< r ~ L0B8YAREA PA~ED p""~'"" -A k: r- DEC~ PAAKl~D AAU -M,OOOol (INCUJDES SIDEWALK!l A LAND!lalP[) ~C IV> ( . ( P>o<'L~TYUO•<<C ______ _ 81/RFACE-INll'IIIE/1•89,llO(I LEGEND •, "HJ GR-'Pe,c SC-'U" l_ -LOT 7 -L COUR'IYARDM19C.OECI\S-,.o-...... AJr, To 61 ?" 60" q(I" / 50.725sf ,~ LAN;l'E~~-PE•1!!.30DJI Olft¥II v fV 81, "' sc:..r " / ----........... · ·tj' OlHER LAND5CAPEAREAS•J3.495IJI so-WETU,NDSETBACII -~ ..... ..... vo. .; ~lM,-. t LOT1SATEWTEPROl'ERTY•ffi72!W _,r---..___ \ C: ~ '"'Wf""-'-........._ lf SUBTOTALAREA-738,026sf iOO'OHWNSETBACM -----...._ ~ ....__-...... ---__ BUILDING GROUND COVER -1.87 JSOsf W£TLAHD EOOE ~ · • ~~ClP\C,rn c,NE: TOTAL AREA • 925,376sf "°o- ~ QUENDALL TERMINALS -PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE RENTON, WASHINGTON CENTURY PACIFIC, LLLP EXHIBIT? ,iiu_ i.i.~J ill U) _J <( z "- :Z~=:J ~ ~ es~~ f--U) Ci ~ a'.: _J • >- _J ~ §5 <( ~ ~ z z 0 ~ b' z w ::J 0 l I ! I -' . ~ l : 1 -. -! : ~ • 0 . -~~ ~; PO.O V, 14,rE W,45h'i/VG,-01v ' _/-------------....-·---·r, 'I-,~-i~ ;,;,f";·" . ~""" /., .( . .... ' ~---= ' ---., ·,:,(i!ll , I" "" ~~, ill@ .... ' "' /' '··-' • ~'--~ ,. ''· ', .. -..· ~ .. / ~~ ... ... "· " ill 8 8 • • I•.::""'· ,., ,. ~-..-'-;:.: •' --\1ili~ ~,,.. ·------..I ';-..'i,• 111. ··• ~'cr;~~i="i,tsf ~;i''~~ir · t~" ·• · • · '!ft":':!t. -~. · ?·.' . ff! '9 ,.. ill . , , !91; ~'·;:;; •• "1~111'-" . • .._ _ ,.. 1 tfj)!& ,.::) l ,. ,.. .~-,)!!Ii. '''.. •~·· "l .• , ./ 1·· Tl [ • • r .• ""'.· "Jy . •• ,i' ·1n; 1 -. ,':,:: t( -•~ ~ .. , \-""•I -)-,' · , 1 ., --.~ -v'Sfr•:ift"'""tii $fl ,,. ' , .. "'. •.. . •·"'··1 -, 'ii'-" ••• i '~ :i'f' . .1 . '® '*/.. -9 ~ {:! : ' : • •$•; r' ,._ .• , _: i, . :•• •· -l ?i\ e •• , .. • ( y 1 •• ., • . t): "~ l-~ ... ilir ~ , L ; . ;, ,, < rif ·"cs ,t·,1 I* "1'' I\ ::1 "'-I•'! ,r,:•,.1··.·.•·j' ""I' : ·. '"· °"'"'· ,.. • ""• I ~ ,,, I l'W '111" ( , -. •e ~ , t, , -',O, '0;.1 :~• • ~ .. t··. ~Cd l: .. i.~I ~ ,:~·-:i~ rr•. *'.' ;;,'.: !.111 .•• ; .• ·.· .. ,!•>.•®.< :'1\¥• ~--",r"l.111'.,,-, ••• N .,,,1 _ _.-L@*'":~·)\j<l/f,\;'", ,-M, '-~ • • ~ "u.-..._ ~ 1!"'f•·L~ ·••*•:~~ : I i.--,·j:¥1i"!};· -·:: ;: i::'._;f\ I \••••,: }ts • jlt >I ·«"M;-: tli! t "':' '-1.ffi- 'f' a!. ti: 1-u::..-... ;.1t,~ -.-.,i..: ~ • I~"'~' -\1'.-r dil ~ • ~· . .J ~, ; .t , e_ c:R· \\IJ""'.' * ~ ' . -if, .. h. iii . iii,.,!• ... $ ... Iii* .. ~ ... ii\ •• ;r i!:l •• , -~ • • 1' ,. "' Iii!'" ll'; !I' u c,,,i,'\!' .. "' --€<!> ;, 1Th ~¢f!!i ~---,.a:...~_ .. _._J __ :o. ~,-L~,.-t.. ¥ 'ltT ~ ift. ~~ _J ¥~._ r-,f"....,,, ~·e' ~----<m LEGEND y, e lil,@ •<3,i "' •.' 'I' • " '-.of, I 1 •'Ii 1i I "' ., • , er '.c J. • , J "" OHWM ~~ • •• • •• •(I , , ~:.'! . .,.r G ~ ~r: :) r ,m ~·. .. I , , "" ,,;, , '. •• • lie (fill ~ I • ~ .'. /ffi "5 , •If-I '··"'·( O/,T , •• J"' J -" ~ : ' 1•• :II( '" ®, ~ , \,.,. • ':,{J"WlTlANOSCTBACI\ \. I... t' ;.-. -f,::i -~l~ •L,i ~ •• .:)1 :/ I, 100'0HWNSEIB/l,CM 1lJj lil~ •. 4 I ~: .... ~ 9 ~ if ! ~ J: :} J :: ') > • • N I Ill 11 • / ~ -\. ,-, • wm"ornGe '1t •• -8 •t , ,•V,,, ,t f'~, , . l: '} ,. ]•!; j 1• • .:~ ,@I ~ • ., -''& _3 H < n. • • l ~-' • • IIL. • •9 ~~l e ••• I .. ·i ~'lit" LL ii\@@'\.. lil'$"'.i;'~ \l) .... (!\ ;!)"Ii,-;;''l"if' . -_-_--:-:·-.-·'\ ,1 ---------. _____ ,, / "' f .,_ 1'"' UNIT SUMMARY -------- ~w m SlllrnTIAL TOT~l UNITS -257 NW flESIDENll,\I. TOTAL UNITS~ 127 SE RESIDENTIAL TOTAL UNITS• 154 NE RESIDENTIAL TOT/ll t.:II.ITS ~ 154 TOTAL UNITS ~ 69:? DECM PARKING SE QUfll>R/1.!H ~ 00 DECK PARMIJ\iG STALLS Nl ()l'/\OR/\\ T ~ 39 DEC!!: P~flMI\JG ST/ILLS TOTAi NCK PARKl\'G = 1fi9Sn.LLS LEGEND DUMPSTER, RECYCLE BIN UTILln' AND ELECTRICAL SPACE EXIT STAIR ,~ LOB8'1' AR(A e, PREFERRED~AL TERNATIVE QUENDALL TERMINALS RENTON, WASHINGTON CENTURY PACIFIC, LLLP tJ) ..J <( z ::l!: c:: LJ.J 1- ..J ..J <( Q z LJ.J ::::) O' PO.C LEGEND OHWM 50' WETLAND SETBACK 100' OHWN SETBACK WETLAND EDGE i. •, ~ ~0--,, -' i. •, • ""1, '?:, ~ ,,. 'le, t ~~ =-=-:::~\ 1:; .l: ~::/ ' "'*t iv. :4sH1.tvGro!\f ~ \ '2, ~ "~ ('l ':, ~ \ .::,~ '1) ~-~ "z. q,1 ~i. \ ~ }/,. .. .. ~--__,__ -··---- ---------~- ~ ('Q ..,Q' " i • ' .. Jh';' c·~lcJ / I .,,, : 's:\l •• • i. ~ t ~0- ~ PARKING SUMMARY P·1 COVERED GARAGE PARKING: SW QUADRANT= 347 PMK!NG STALLS NW QUAOOANT-95 PARKING STALLS SE QUADRANT~ 318 PARKING ST6.LLS NE QUADRANT w 206 PARKING STALLS TOT Al P-1 PARKING -966 STALLS SURFACE PARl\1NG· SW QUADRANT• 151.SURFACE PARKING STALLS SE QUADRANT~ 42 SURFACE PARKING STALLS NW QUADRANT~ 38 SURFACE PARKING STALLS TOTAL SURFACE PARKING • 231 STALLS DECK PARKING SHOWN ON SHEET PO.O: Sf QUADRANT• 130 OECII PARKING STALLS NE QUAOl?ANT • 39 DECK PARKING STALLS TOT Al DECK PARKING • 169 STALLS RESTAURANT \9.000 &fl REQUIRED PARKING E 36 RETAIL [20.225 5f) fl(Ql!lfl[O PARKING w 81 692 RESIDEl'/TIAL VN!TS llEQlJIRrn PIV:U\ING -1 211 TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED -i.328 STALLS TOML P'IRIIING SllOWl>I • 1.366 ST/\LlS LEGEND --······-···-···---·---·-·--·-·-·-·-·--- . DUMPSTER:' RECYCLE BIN UTILlTY AND ELECTRICAL SPACE EXIT STAIR LOBBY AREA QUENDALL TERMINALS PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE RENTON, WASHINGTON CENTURY PACIFIC, LLLP EXHIBITS .- Ul ... I <I: z 2 D::::: w 1--- _J _j <I: 0 z w ) 0 fl 1 . ( ////// ~ ·--.; ""' ~ .L • ~ <1:, l<,r.s"' ~S,Lf;,vG7t>N -y '"°' <'· °" t"'l 9,, \ LEGEND OHWM \· '~~-~~....._ \, r,~ .... ,na~. x./. ~- \ 1111111111 . ,, y 50' WE'TlAND SETIIACK 1.00' OHWN SEmACK WETlAND EDGE --~ _ .. -i l_.,c:"'.""'SC''~---- ~ _.,c:"c."'."'-"""'--;~~KING SUMMARY P·l COVERED GARAGE PARKING I SW'""""""""""""" NW QUADRANT• 96 PARKING STALLS ' llltl·~ : :14" ORI"' : ~ f::C:~-/1 -~~~ ------.. -~ rns~,:; =oOPE:or< us. ' . ;_!_ ' -·--------,-,,srsce~~i ) ~, -If: I n« '"' I ~---__ SE QUADRANT• 318 PARKING STALLS NE QUADRANT• 206 PARKING STALLS TOTAL P·1 PARKIIIIG • 988 STALLS SURFACE PARKING: SW QUADRANT• 151 SURFACE PARKING STALLS SE QUADRANT• 42 SURFACE PARKING STALLS NW QUADRANT• 38 SURFAC~_PA~K~~-G 5_!:'~~ TOTAL SURFACE PARKING• 231 STALLS DECK PARKING SHOWN ON SHEET PO.O: SE QUADRANT• 130 DECK PARKING STALLS NE QUADRANT• 39 DECK PAA KING STALLS TOTAL [)EC!( PARKIIIIG • 169 STALLS RESTAURANT{9,000 11) REQUTRED PARKING• 36 RETAIL (20,225 sf) REQUIRED PARKING a 81 692 RESIDENTIAL UNITS REQUIRED PARKING• 1,211 TOTAL PARKING REQUIR['[J a 1,328 STALLS TOTAL PARKING SHOWN • 1,361:1 STALLS LEGEND ~DUMPSTER/ RECYCLE BIN r:rfrl UTILITY AND ELECTRICAL SPACE ""l EXIT STAIR ts_ LOBBY AREA L'1K~; ~''""'". " . _,, (i ~ov BL vo \ ,~",. '.'. .,,"' ~ ------"p"~'""-~~-'-·,,~,.~. ~,-- 5C, 725sl -----i ' ~ ~ 'i:, o;. ---,,...-C,,};;-,,0"("--_ --- w i ""''" ,.sr_ l_f ___ , QUENDALL TERMINALS -PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE RENTON, WASHINGTON CENTURY PACIFIC, LLLP (/) __J <i: z ~ 26 ~ 0:::: ~ u WI LL f--'-" C ~ i __J " >- __J z "' ~:::::: <( z, ~ 0~ b z w :::) 0 ~ :JI < i . ; ~ ~ . ' ,1 P1 .0 ~ /-------------------------- / urn,o cm,rn TOTAL AREA -~~.:;----------------- / ;OURTYARD TOTAL AREA= "17,60Qs' ---..__ ON DECK P-<G AREA = 59,000sl -----..._ __ / SURFACE PKG AREA = 59.000sf -.....______ _____ _ / 0, °':' CS AREA • 25,00,s' ~-1 / STRE~TS '1>.', '8' & 'c' ARFA = 99,/5~·s' / SIDEWALK TOTAL AREA = 60.BOOsf ./ NATU'/AL -ANOSCAPE AREA = 140,33Asf ( LOT 7 SAELLIE PROPERTY= 50.725sf . UNPAVED FIRE LANE & PED. WALK AREA = 19,970sf \ ,-...-----.-----------------SlREETS 'o' &: 'E' A~EA = 23,522sf ! ; i ' Ji " i S1REET LEVEL LANDSCAPE AREA = 15.300sf OTHER LANDSCAPE AREA = J3,495sf TOTAL SITE AREA TO HIGH WAlER LINE -925,376sf ! ! ! i ~ j ! f • ; i i i i i ; ! ; i ; I ' ' ' ' I I ! I - /, ·a· & ·c_ = ,-,'l.2:,_ri~ l " i ; I ~ . ' ~ ; i ; I ! ; I ! . . ' • ; ~ ' STREET ",\· .~RE/\ = ~O,OOOsf EXHIBIT 9 ~-~ ! ; I I ! ! I • ' ' i I ; ! ' :\1:1' OH"" S>:ll!ACI< 100' OI<""' &',!AC• -.............__ __ ------ O\J OECK 1.S AREA 25,0rJOsf -------------- LOT 7 50.72.Ss! ------ II \ (/) _J <i:: z ~ -z ~ 2 :2:::: 0::: ~ 0 W:r: ~ L__ LI) u ~« 4 " ~ _J . r _J rs s <i:: ~ ~ 0~ ~ z w :=i 0 <C iii P2.0 <C QUENDALL TERMINALS -PREFERRED ALTERNATE E1<t('rior Oe<;ign Goals: f.kl' ... :.W;(, '\\'c',.! RENTON, WASHINGTON CENTURY PACIFIC, LP ·1··' •'•l,a sun. :.w.:c, r,.;w 1 H,~;,i,,,.1,a!!b"• f,,,l<Er~,. 1:, A,•·~•>Fl•cK ' !', B1,ilrlir,qs F,tw,or r,,,;,h l'·'·' ,,.~-, PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION FROM LAKE WASHINGTON -------------------------------------------------------~ ' ' ·.~:~¥1t.~: .... ,E~~~j. J. >~-':L' t 1.f'~..I ' ·.,;,,,) '-+~·.t-~' i""' -------------------------------------------------------J ':ll.111'.l!~,,:-, NSV) f31.H..Dlf\,G NW I -,\~_f ·!!.l!;i.iFit:dii·' •· -,-, •~rr:+.~,--~..,...,..,.. -iiw. · iiiFii:qu~-:.-.. !Hl=,~'"'a<"""·"'r":tlllll .;c;-+: ;,,;·,_· ,.,.,.,_ ;;;;.:. ,~ 1 )>:!'·' :i/':ii( illfl. •l'B!l'::·"'•' M-~~·';"' k_}~;tt~'JB~!l+ffi_3·s--c~~~5~~~~~~£> Bt.;IL.1.)1'-.:(J $':\' . !O'Jlt.D!NG SW) BU U)II\(; S'h'? OVERALL WEST ELEVATION FROM LAKE WASHINGTON EXHIBIT 10 ~ m_;i, u1~1c:-; s','1 .t <I) ...J <( z 2: 0:: UJ 1- ...J ...J <( Cl z UJ :::> 0 P3.0 QUENDALL TERMINALS -PREFERRED ALTERNATE Exk:rior Dc5ig11 Goals: p. ,,,, ,,, :·I-~ 10.1·.,-·- RENTON, WASHINGTON CENTURY PACIFIC, LP R,,., I"'" liPsl,,.,,,m 5r,,i,·n f,~tc<cc, R,esh,•nLt, . ' ,I-'· s ~-~' "'I' . !~~ BUILJI\IG \l'N 1 PARTIAL SOUTH ELEVATION r--------------•-•••••••••••·---------------------------~ ,$JE;:<' JCH' ''.c. ,, m,~ "'" ccs~:{~~,~~r~L,~~14 -------------------------------------------------------~ BUIL)I\JG \!\·\' 1 <'·UY!/,_' [.', ·,;,1.·:-:(";"; W' . "'''' .:J'-'.::;::L-,, ,c,-.----··-'.,TC' rr::.ij r:r--r--rn L~~ ;o.d r:.-1 -1'0 -m , ... ,..., ,-, ~--., i"';,,,t.-"k~~u.,;,,~ ,,,, .. .,,:.:-.. ,'.:''\ "· l..,,)'~:J1 \/;-~<.-r} ~~;~? . 1~:::-·r ? pT -<-.. ~,~ii ~,t __ ~~"'."' 1 '"'~.,. l '-. a. • --"L ___;1.~. " ' BUl:_O'\IG NE 1 SOUTH ELEVATION ......., ,, ~ <( z ::ll: 0:: UJ 1- ...J ...J <( Cl z UJ :::) Ct P3.j 0 C rn z 0 )> r r -I rn ;o s:: o::oz-mm ZZ)> -I -I cor ;;oz -<-(/) ""C ~ )> )> I o en -I "'T'1 "Tl-V () z "'T'1 -Gl;v r -I rn ro r ""C z "'TI m X I a, =i rn ;o ;o rn 0 )> r -I rn ;o z )> -I -< rn ·J • ::.'.; ,:I: ~ 5~ :l..:~~_j •;.·:! , .:" (:) ..!.-" ,_,...._ • ,---t- , j -.i ,/ :z! i,.i ~ C) /i ! , I I i / ' ~[~ I '>0 '"'"'"c »•TT.c ,,. ,a,>, ,ca ,., ,ss, (,[ L-'' JC LI i~, ~.LL EY . I PE:r,1~.:11-1, ..,,~.~-1 ,i, T,-rJ ,-.rn~1~~: .. ,, f---~--n= i_:1:::i ' i. ' l ! I 1 " ' ' ' f'O'(NTIAl H[IAINf'jG IIIIJ..l \ \ \ \ ''I, ~\ ( ' ~ ··. 1:1 *---~~:-------14:±J--J 5lll¥-~~~, ·:~~ "~ :-, ·i-l--+ ~, ~~~:~; -"/~~. • . 0\ ,~;'?Y"· ~:_~ llffllJ-CURB 111.fl_/. ~!-LQW-~f'5(T!I') ---:~. -;, 11 • l ------.11 r ---,--------------·---~-~---=-~----,=_____ ·:zll.j ,-,--., ... --!-- ,I' · 1 .· I -~· - ------------------~ii:~~~CF~-:,-:-'.~:.=----~-----.~ ::~,~ ::~~~~:-r-~, _:-; ~~=-:~ --------_-_ -~~-t !:, ----·-. -----__ -_RIPLEY LANE --------------· r-_-_ -----,' ~< l4Kt •is~ '° NOTES: EINIP.C1!11EHTAl REIIE!llm'.tl ANO llllllCAT!al ~ 1IIE !'l!IY[RT"l' l'llll BE (:(tl[l(IClID PRIOR TO [(\RWWENT ~E EN\'1(lNljOOAL ~OT[CTI(II M.BICY (EPA) IS 1\1[ lII.D AIINCY rOR All Silt ll\MED(A~ I.HO l,ITIGATilll AC~S ~ AA'E 10 BE PERFORMED AT ll'E o.!ENDI.Ll. TEl':IIINA!.S SIT[ IMOER 9"£l!Flll(I 1. AOOITIONAl Erull.[]ING RI)(!' DRAIN CCl'INECTI!JNS Al(I f'IPlm: ltlY BE r.r~,,rn 1 fLEXIBI.E UllJT"l' cetlNECTilllS SW.Li 0C USEll &MEN sm\JCM!EO EIUILOINGS A~D UIISl'llJCTIJl/£0 ':HE Al!fA'; JO IINllllf M P.ISK fF OIJ.IA(l' Ta UTILITIES DUE TO DFFERENTIAl 51:TIIIMENT. 12130/15 IIE"'Sl:O PER Mlll(;Ailll! R(OJH'MOITS "" " CIID APPR RE\IISION t-_....,.~-,._ _ ~litNc10 ., • • "':-'Y RCvo --~ -~---. ' ---- EXHIBIT 12 ;[lRA1'! BY OC':llXO SY 'clil Tll ii!lll TAD ~ OIE'.(1(£(1 BY APPRO\Ul BY om llfLll 100 1G 11 }cpff =~·:::::,""® WTJ ~Ill' cm l-lll-111·1555 --- NOV 16, 2009 --- SCALE·l JOB N,;,.:1500050 AS NOTED --• • C ~/I,/ re ,, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION QUENDALl TERWINALS 4350 IN([ WAStfflGTON IIOULEYARD, RENTON, WAStlNGTtlt LAND USE, SHORELINE & MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION CONCEPTUAL STORM DRAINAGE AND GRADING PLAN SHEET C300 , a l ! f l I I i ! ~ . --------- ____ _.,....._ ----_-:-·---·-pr-----·--·::::1/•"-, --~ --<'™~"'"' { ----~ ='-'"'™"m-1™~1,, ! .,.:'. '· · · ·, '--flB'=laG7 • \, / / 100' l'.l1l'M SETBACK • • SU: NOit I _& 2 :=:--,, \ / \ -(TT'P.DllHlf~HOIIELilfE) \'' , / ·~~Lr:.;ATI~-:,;:,,_ ,,-_ _, "-,' -------I, (11' .. - , -! --oo""" I ·---_ -,_, .!·-1 ----, -~----.,,, UKI WASHINGTON ,. .~-" ";_ _-_." .. ':\ ... , ~1_ SlCRMFiLtrll ~H " ' I I~ I ,·, ___ / rn,,o,ossmo" , ;)-" ,-.. 1 . _ __ --;:.e;-,~m,oc, 1 , ,, . ' . . ' --/ ,,, ' ·/.._·:,__-_. ·_~_: .. '' ·'1·_,,,· '"-., .. I 1' _-y ,I ~-PRl:':!Tn.ll!GV~Ull ~-"' . ~;-......_ .,,-• I / ---' • . . . . . ' -::.\-,_.:;J' .. ' -----:-----~~ . ' . -------. ,. ',, , , ~~~ ~---::.::----------~ ----::_~-----~------.._-,,,_ \s ""--.... ·=-.: ·. _.,:c_ __ _,,"~~--------w1,11..', . ..,_ J_' -------~ --------.:...__________ ·"---------~-;;:;~-~---:~ -,. --~ ~~~-----:-;;,",~ , ._ I'--------.-. ;;,f(" ~~" .,,,.---=,.,c / --:-__ '""-=:~4-·-22__ \"' \ \ . ......JI --\ ~ 1 ·-.:--,......_ 18" \ \ ·C·""'··· ,\\-:/ ____ \\\[ fl_· •. OUTFALL"'™ '-... £N[RCY [)l',9p~-. ' -._:__ . .:1 \\ .-.)'~ :: \ --\--~' \ -= I 'IF~-FLOW :_I o\Q~i.s-;_ ~ ..---I •------....__ ~ v;:> \l ·~) . \ 1~1-~ \\_) 0 011NTil.l ~CTklN'NG Wl,U / • • '·\ ~l. \\ '~ ' -- _____ -... ~--~· ,~ "" l/OTES: fN\1ROHM£NT/J. Rl:M[l)IATI-Cfl A1lJ ~l~GA'IIIJ1 Of' TIE P'!«'El<lY lllll ~f CON(x.'C8l PR,C!! ro OCl'[L<YMENT THl (N'IIRON~OHIJ. PROTlCTION AGENCY (FPA) IS '!HF LEI.[) 1.11NCr FCI< l,ll SITE RCMmATICfl MO MITIGAllC*I ACTIONS 11111101 ARE TO 8E P£RFDJ™EO AT lHE OI.O(ll,ll ltR~INALSSITlU~DfNSlJ~ND 2 THE Pll(]J:U Sil[ tlWJOCS -~~ArrtY l.s.!l3 FUT Cf SHCPEl.,fE IJ.CflG LAKE ll'•':>11NGTCII A 100-FOOT 'IIIOlH IIP'1l1AH SE"IB•~ 11,l[ASlJll([) IRl),I TIE ~'-RY ~l(l! UT£R M'1l~) .I.NO P'1llJJ..Il_S IJ.ONG Tl-IE SHOR8.JlfE. A S110llEllff. RESlORATl-00 Pl.AN IS EOfG 01 SIGNED AHD AP~Ol'EO UN Orn EPA CJRECTI{II 3. £).1SllNG 111: IL•N1lS l,J,IQ CIJNCU'IUAL \lfll./.NO CIHTION/R[',IO,All{II ARl•S SHOMI HA\E HOT PfC[l'/EO flNIJ. EPA OC'.,CN .of'PROVIJ.. e, A001ll{II/J. RLJll..;Ji~ Re«" DRAIN CONNECTIONS AHD PIPING MAY 8[ <[001~0. FLtX181..E UllLI!Y l:ctlNCC~S SHIU aE lffD BCT"1irol Slfl\JCT\IIDl BUILDINGS .1.Nl U~SiRUCT\IREO sin AAEAS TO u,,11,11l( T>lf Hl'il< Of OA~AG1 10 UTILil'E5 OU[ TO DIITTRENTIIJ. SEffi™ENT CHD [ APPll l!E~SED PER IIITIGJ\TIOO Rl:OOIRE!,![NTS REVISION · ·----"---.. / ·---i ' 1//"•-....c-~ -----------'lr ------' -''""""' ,,,_, __ --1-. -l!ESIDfHTIAl IIT~~hll LEGE~ND~'---___ _ =:J OC"l'J'l:O D~ ITT, l#'R(Jl'[[I BY, "" DATE NOV 16. 200_~ JOB No .. 15000:00 £).1SlNG i,fl\.Af(l (SII HOT"E 3) CONCTl'IU.o!_ il(ll..Mf[l (ll(ATIOO/RCT!ffiAll{II (SII NOTE: 5) C/ll 001110 MHFll\100~ __1·!1H11:__ll55 S C A L E: AS NOTEO lcpff tE<lt~hA=~•.>""'"°' S.M,l,,WA"''°' """'·""' www.kpfl,"'"' Hl\l(Jl/,(] ROCf-- DRIII/ OOTLET ,t;E NOTES 4 J ~- . POTU/11/J. - R[Tl:NING WI!!_ RES1D£NTI~L !if.-~,}] • .., 1 • I! ~/ " " . '~,;.-. "'" I "I' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OUENDALl TERMINALS 4350 lAkI WASfflNCTON llOUlIV>.R!l! ROO'OH, WASfflNGTON LAND USE, SHORl'llNE & MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION CONCEPTUAL STORM DRAINAGE AND GRADING PLAN SH'::ET C301 ' i l ! J l I l I l ! ~ • " c 0 I ~ .· ,· .,. " ! 12' LAN~. " • ~[WIJ~/ $/O(W"LK/ ,/._..~-:, ,· ""' !/ tA~0SCAPE lANDSCAI'!: • I I 1_:;_;, ~ l~i ' =---=-i i -i M• • "...AAl.!:S 3DE"!fl.U(/ I LMDSCOK I MAl(]t[X~ / STREET A -TYE!_CAL ROADWAY SECTION £i:",, sou,,._,, \J ~ u r " o 1s· 10· 12· Row I ,t ~~c"c·~~~~ ,,. Sll[ll'IU(/J.ANDSCAPE ./ ! ' 2 ~ / ~IJ.K/LANOSCI.PE PM<k:1'11; LANO I L/,l£ -r PARKlHG Cf! SUJEWI.U( ~ -•-6" ClJRB (TYP) :? I c ~/ 1-:!; ,,,.--/ 1-i,: 1 2': i 1-n. L . ix. zi:; • --,,_-• 1 ·" ~/ 11' S(O'ILJ( • j> ·-~ STREET B -TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION SCALE. ,· ~ 4 ~ • I ,· ,1F-OJ1 I ,,. ·-WC ' ---W!E ~ I ' Q I r H" WRll lnP) 0: [./ I.:.?!. -" "-- ~SU)[W.11..1( mnos m ROADWAY £OGE 'llliE:!E HC 00-SIRITT EB PAf!IONG, SU PLM (TYP) ' ll'Sl)[WAIJ( ,_, 0 ~ ' ~ "--~.ou: mums TO RO.IDWM EDGE ll!iERE NO CN-SlREEl STREET C -TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION c '~'""·"' "m 1'"' SCIJ..L I"~,. EXHIBIT 13 " :1 9 • [ ' • NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I I f ff I BE,~ Cllll'IIIIE ~~ IIFtl[ 100 [I; 1-!00-m-1555 lq,ff '"'.'"_'-""'"~ ,. __ w,,.,,, ---- ~/ ~~ ~ _ .. ,., .. QUENDALL TERMINAlS 4350 LAK!_!~ BOIJL£V.UO, ROOON, WASIHTON LAND USE, SHORELINE & MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION ROADWAY SECTIONS SHEET C302 "' 12/30/15 DATE "' CIID. I APPi< RE,,,SEIJ ~ IIITJ(;A~CN l!EOOIR[ll[NlS R[\/ISION ~~9-~-- ~ JOB ~.:1500050 SCALE: AS NOTED ' ¥ 3 l l ! i j ' £ , ' - - - N8. - 17/JU/15 RE~SUl PER MITlGHCN RCWIREIIEIITS DATE '" ca, APPR R[\/IS10N " ~-,, -------lw -,. ,,. ~ i , ' lANQ~~/,ff l ,., ,., '__AHQSC•Pf ' ' I VARIES _/,, 6" CUIW (m) I / " "-/,.,, u..... ,--u==--' ~AID1 EX___/ STREET D -TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE SECTION/D\ S~Alf: 1· ~ 4 \_:___) < , --· ,u1[S_!J16'41'f I _lr ~ARIES 5.6'-9.j § rn' ,,- ,ID[~IJ.1/ -------,-----lA•E ·----r::"' i a V,NQ',CA."{ ' ~; 1// -b"CIJR!l(IYP: I s " [ / " --. STREET E -TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE SECTION/[\ s:ALI: 1" = f \_:___) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY ocsm.o BY Clllmll'JH£1S ~~/ OUENDAll TERMINALS SH[ll TAD WTJ 0,f[.');[D ar APPR(lll[l) ll1 Dm llllll YOO 1G l<pff '""""""_,_ " 4350 W:E W~ll«ITON IIOlll.EVI.RD, ROO'ON, W,l,SlfNCTON WTJ DATE l,jAV S.,fflo,w.s.,,01 ~-1-100-111-~II -~-,~" LAND USE, SHORELINE It MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION C303 -·-·""'" Ntll IS. 2009 S C A L E· ROADWAY SECTIONS JOB No .150005ll AS NOTED """P'. ' ! I i l I ! j ' ' \ r \ i ) BAl!BEEMUCN'!f!Y----.i_ __ .,.-···_ rt+ .. ~---/~• 1 t·I/ --' _, C -I R!lJJCA I[ (J:1Sf UTIIHY '; .. 00!-J)illlITT -----------~-· =+--~------- WATER NOTES: All ~£11 /IND fl£LOCA'JED F'JRE ~,t,RANT'; 51-"ll BE PER Wl STANOIIRO Pt.AN 8102 All PIIIJ'(r.'.:0 IIAlfR M/ornS ARE l.OCJ,JID 1111111N lHf 3?0 PRfSSlJ'l£ Zct.f flil(1Bl£ UTIU'1' COtflECTl(lNS ~All [I( l«D B[J'ij\_!_N SIRUCIU!llD tJJJtlNNCS 00 UNSIRI/CTURED SIJE ARE/.S TO Mll«J,jJZE ll£ RISI< Of DAM.ICE TO UTI'JTIES DUE TQ DFIB!OITI/1.L SErnD,1£NT LEGEND: ll[CH.U!IC.fJ_ SEIMC£ ROOIII: • DOM PRY, 111:TER AND RPBA ~ :~~~FRll,IOOl'JDE • fOC (II l'Mll'.IIIG FACF • FF:EH1'DRNH N V.ot\11: FRAN~l'x: UIUT'f DUCT BINK (Car,aj, GA~ POll{R) IFT=32.~j fl11SHEO FL~ a..EVATIOO I I I I I I ,.~.. .,~, .. fw:A:i~BYj "' 12(.l0/15 °'~ " CHO I APPR 11[11~ PfR M111GHl)j RECIJIREMENTS REVIS10ri NOV 1~._?QQQ. JOB Mo :1500050 CIU Ill) llllSS ~~ IHI[ IOO II, i•m-5555 SCALE: AS NOTED lq,ff """''"'--·"'""'"" '"'""w, .. ,o, ,., ... ,,_,.,, www.kpff.<>Offl EXHIBIT 14 -.. --,- --·-·.,1----'-"- ,,__ __ -~ ------. - ~~ ----....:::: =.::::::..___ '--- rx' 12' 'II ~ml 8( AT 1£1,ST 4' IJfCrR nNG£D /l</,(1( Of PROP r---- I .I _.,.-f!IS1 14· / t,OCER ISUIID ~JRO ,BIER ,~ IIRONIA MASCI! / ATHlETIC Cf1il!:II / Tll!CE OR / ' ( ~! -__:i ,, ,, • ~/ •• ~ !II) • ·-·· -l<lft NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION QUENDALL TIRMINALS SHEET "350 LW: WASMNGTON BOUIIVARD, RDmltl, WASt!INGTOf lAND USE, SHORELINE I< MASTER PlAN PERMIT APPLICATION CONCEPTUAL UTILITY PlAN C400 f i l ! I i l l ' -----------. ~-;~ I -----------.. ~ '.,;_ -:~--.::\ ~ 'Ill;~ \ ..... I lfflNARY >llCll w.•:mn(1,RR [lffl'II) \ . - :;;'W~SH;NGTDN \ ~···1- ' . '--. -·---'--, ~~ >t woow=•>,\ \ . _ .. F .. ;:. · ··· ···· ' · ·\_ -.l -\ \ ' ------~:-j 111 ! 111 'l ~/ ':-lLJ I [_ ', %, '-<> \ r= I ",Z:::.) \\ t::.. . . .· .. ,f c-~ \ .. /, \ . -- \\/·.· · .• · .··. ·~ -....... -. \ · .. \/ ·~· -\\c, *. -~ ~~~>. \\ 1 ' '=t=:' \ \;;.>> ,, '£ \ '\;·~ ~- i. ' ., ··: ."-_rno:~WSET9ACl(. '. \\v -·-.. -.... --_. _,. --·-. ...--~ -«.,_ ·, \ -. ,_ ._-.·::---\ \ .,..._ __ J,.._ / ~ -'-,,_ ...._ ------', . ~ .. \ -· ~ ·. ---,.,--', "---1 ' · .. · . \\ \/ --""--c .. ·.. ---~~---' //~ ··>---,, ', '""'~ . -. _,..-------------~~ -----------._________.....----, ~ "...._ --=~--..._. -c·::..--;z,;;;;;;"·:":~~· JC~~~' _:"':!~' ---:--:-i'=--~-~ __ ; _,...--~-~ ·. -··\· w·f1'11-~N ~~ ~---1 -_' ,:~:_+--/,, 1~-....~.;w _ f _ ----, I ~_/ -~~ 1 ,! / I I W, •/ "-·--._ --:--- RES!DEHTJAL jrr-~ssj ~-"11 ~~; ' ' • ~l=Jli I:: ~ -pr i -L...d. .• --llg 1~1-1- \ \' • c--t... \.<\ \t] \ '(;/ ·. l_..n.._ __,_____3..,.;: --___._ W.I.TER NOTES: IJ I NEW /.!fD P.£1.0CATID flRE H~ANTS 9-1/ti BE Pffi COO Sl/.l,{IARO Pl.AH Bill All PRorc,fll W•lER ~MIS 1K LOCAlUI IIITHN T~F 310 PRESS~'RE ZCtl[ FLOJEl.E UTlW COl'NECTICtlS 9-IAU. El U~ (UMIN SIP.\JCJ1JRffi BIJll.{IINGS !.ND l1NS1R1J:1UREO SITE AA[A.S m MINll,lilE lHE R1$1\ (;f" Di,UAC( ro UTIUTI['j Ill![ TO O'f'tR[N[,Al. SEffiEoi:NT Lllilill; M[CHI.MICJI. s.EIMC[ OOOlt ~ • DOl,I PIW, M(TFR AND RP91, ~ •flRl:OOCYI, • AC(B$ 0~ Fllet.! OOTSIOC • me ON BUILDING r1,a .. flREH'IMANT VAll'E -=-,_. FRANCHIS[ UTUTY oocr Bl<HK (C,»,i, GAS. PO\IIER) jFJ'=3?.5I IJNl':,1[0 flWl [lHATION e, '"' ~PPR RE\ISED PER MfTIGA~ON R[IJJe'MfNTS RE\'ISION DIITE NOV 16. 200~ J a B No. :1500050 Cl!l lllllllH M~ llfll[ IOO 1G l·llH11-Sl55 S C A L E: AS ~OTEO lqJff :.":,'~'::.':;':~,'""''""" ,.,.,.,, . ..,, mkpn ..... " // •• ,........ . I n<h = ., NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION QUENDALL TERMINALS $f'ffT 4350 WE W~ BOOLEVIJ!tl, ~. Wo\SIKTON LAND USE, SHORELINE & MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION CONCEPTUAL UTILITY PLAN C401 EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC 2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 707 Seattle, WA 98121 Te~phone: (206) 452-5350 Fax: (206) 443-7646 www.eaest.com January 12, 2016 Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development, Planning Division 1055 5 Grady Way Renton,WA 98057 RE: Quendall Terminal EIS Appeal Dear Vanessa: Per your request, EA has prepared the following summary of the opportunities that the City of Renton provided for involvement by the general public and U.S. EPA in the SEPA process for the Quendall Terminals project. The attached table summarizes the public's and EPA's involvement in the SEPA process, including the following information: • Step in SEPA Process: e.g., DEIS, EIS Addendum, FEIS and EIS Appeal; • Required: whether or not the step is required by SEPA; • Provided: whether or not the step was provided for the Quendall Terminals EIS; • Date(s): the dates on which the step was accomplished for the Quendall Terminals EIS; • Duration: the duration of the step for the Quendall Terminals EIS, including whether it was extended beyond the duration required by SEPA; and • Comments: comments on public/EPA involvement (e.g., the number of comment letters and emails received on the Quendall Terminals EIS Scoping, DEIS and EIS Addendum, and the way in which EPA's comments were incorporated into the EIS). As shown by the attached table, the City went above and beyond the SEPA requirements to involve the public in the Quendall Terminals EIS process, including: extending the EIS Public Scoping period (from the required 21 days to 70 days); holding a Public Scoping meeting to provide additional opportunity for public comment (which is not required); extending the DEIS public scoping period (from the required 30 days to 60 days); holding a DEIS public hearing to provide additional opportunity for public comment (which is not required); and taking and responding to public comments on the EIS Addendum (which is not required). The attached table also demonstrates that the City provided expanded opportunities for participation by EPA in the Quendall Terminals SEPA process and incorporated their input into the EIS, including: attending three meetings with EPA and the applicant to define the baseline assumptions for site cleanup/remediation that were used in the Draft EIS; and responding to EXHIBIT 15 1 comments in two letters from EPA on the DEIS that ultimately resulted in new baseline cleanup/remediation assumptions that were used in the EIS Addendum (e.g., a new Preferred Alternative with an expanded setback from the Lake Washington shore Ii ne was developed and analyzed in the Addendum). Please let me know if you have any questions on this summary. Sincerely, Gretchen Brunner, Senior Planner EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. PBC 2 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Step in SEPA Process DEIS • EIS Public Scoping Period • Public Scoping Meeting • DEIS Public Comment Period • DEIS Public Hearing EIS Addendum • EIS Addendum Public Comment Period FEIS • FEIS QUENDALL TERMINALS EIS PUBLIC & U.S. EPA INVOLVEMENT Required Provided Date(s) Yes (21 days 1) Yes 2/19/10-4/30/10 No Yes 4127110 Yes (30 days') Yes 12/10110 -2109111 No Yes 1104111 No Yes 10/19/12-11/19/12 Yes Yes 8131115 Duration 70 days (extended) 1 day 60 days (extended) 1 day 30 days NIA Comments 5 letters/emails 4 commentators 75 letters/emails 8 commentators 12 letters -Responded to comments on DEIS and on EIS Addendum3 EIS Appeal • EIS Public Appeal Period U.S. EPA INVOLVEMENT Step in SEPA Process DEIS • Pre-EIS Mtgs. Re Baseline Assumptions • Comment Letters on DEIS 'Per WAC 197-11-408(2)(i) 2 Per WAC 197-11-455(6) Yes (20 days 4 ) Yes Required_ Provided No Yes No Yes 3 Taking and responding to comments on an EIS Addendum is not required by SEPA. 4 Per RMC 4-8-110E.1.b 8131115 -9124115 20 days Date(s) Duration 311/10, 4/22/10, 5/12110 1 day each 1/13111,3/12/12 N/A 1 appellant Comments -Baseline assumptions used in DEIS were based on input from EPA at Pre- EIS meetings -Baseline assumptions used in EIS Addendum were modified based on comments on DEIS in EPA's 3/12/12 letter5 5 In their 3/12/12 letter, U.S. EPA indicated that the environmental baseline (post-remediation conditions) assumptions represented in the DEIS are reasonable given the expected general outcome of the Record of Decision (ROD), with an increase of the minimum shoreline setback area to 100 feet from the lake (Lake Washington) edge. The Preferred Alternative analyzed in the EIS Addendum incorporated EPA's recommended shoreline setback. 3 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUA09-151 --------Renton Application Date: November 18, 2009 Name: Quendall Terminals PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Site Address: 4350 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 Version 1 I Engineering Review Comments . Contact: Rohini Nair I 425-430-7298 I mair@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: I have completed a preliminary review for the above referenced master site plan for the mixed use development which includes 692 residential units, 20,025 square feet of retail, and 9,000 square feet of restaurant. The following comments are based on the application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant. General utility comments 1. All buried utilities, public roads, and infrastructure serving the site development shall be placed in clean fill material (with the utilities in a trench with sufficient width and depth of 3 to 4 feet below the invert and adjacent to the utility), along with an acceptable barrier to prevent recontamination of the clean fill material, in order to protect the utility from contamination and to allow future maintenance of the road or utility lines. (Mitigation Measure C29}. This mitigation measure is applicable for both public and private utility lines. 2. The required horizontal and vertical separations as per City of Renton standards should be provided between the utility lines. 3. If the required minimum separation between utility lines need wider pavement width, then the street width should be changed accordingly. 4. Any existing utilities under the proposed buildings will be required to be abandoned and removed, and the easements will be required to be relinquished or amended. 5. All mitigation measures of the Quendall Tenninals Mitigation Document shall be applicable on the project and should be provided by the project. 6. An agreement with King county for access and frontage improvements over King County owned railroad right of way should be provided to the City prior to site plan review application and construction permit application. Water The water utility main lines for this project will be public water lines. Minimum 15 feet wide easement should be provide to the City of Renton for the public water main located in private streets. There is an existing 10 inch diameter water main on the King County parcel fronting the site and an 8 inch water main extending into the Quendall Terminals site. 1. The conceptual utility civil plans submitted should be revised to include the following: lJ Relocate about 870 feet of existing 12 inch water main along the property frontage to be within the new access road referred to as Street A. The existing water line cannot be accessible for repair and maintenance due to the location of the new road. Please see the attached water sketch. L Relocate the new 12 inch water main on the west side of the project to be within the paved 20 foot fire access road. The water main must be located at least 10 feet away from the building foundation and outside of the shoreline riparian area. To comply with these conditions, the buildings will need to be moved back further to the east to allow for the construction of the water main with the paved fire access road. J Complete the water main loop within the fire access road along the west side of the project from Street B to Street E. LJ Minimum 15 feet wide easement is required for water main. 2. All water mains and related appurtenances installed within the site shall be in accordance with the requirements of the EPA's approved plan for installation, operations, maintenance and monitoring plan of utilities. 3. Water mains shall be placed in clean fill materials, in a trench with sufficient width and depth of 3 to 4 feet below the invert of the water line, along with an acceptable barrier to prevent recontamination of the clean fill material, in order to protect the water mains from contamination and to allow future maintenance of the water mains by the City. 4. A utility easement and maintenance agreement with the city of Renton will be required for the maintenance and future repair of the water lines within the site. The property owners will be responsible for all costs related to the excavation, removal, and disposal of EXHIBIT 16 Ran: April 12, 2016 Page1of8 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUA09-151 --------Renton® PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Version ; Engineering Review Comments Contact: Rohini Nair 1425430-72!1& t mair@rentonwa.gov materials and for final restoration associated with the City's operation, maintenance and repair of the water lines within the site. 5. Civil plans for the water main improvements that are submitted with the utility construction permit should be prepared by a professional engineer registered in the State of Washington. Please refer to City of Renton General Design and Construction Standards for Water Main Extensions as shown in Appendix J of the City's 2012 Water System Plan. 6. Payment of system development charge fee and permit fee will be required at the time of issuance of the utility construction permit. Fees that are current at the time of issuance of the utility construction permit will be applicable on the project. Sanitary Sewer The sewer utility main lines for this project will be public sewer lines. Minimum 15 feet wide easement should be provide to the City of Renton for the public sewer main located in private streets. There is a 12 inch sewer main extending near the east property line of the Quendall Terminals parcel. 1. The sewer report mentions that the sewer system was designed to convey the peak flows by gravity to the project discharge location at a new manhole Installed on an existing 12" diameter City of Renton sewer pipe. 2. Along with the utility construction pem,it plans, the developer is required to submit a revised sewer report that will reevaluate the existing Baxter lift station. The lift station capacity will need to be increased to serve the needs of the Ouendall Terminals project. The sewer report submitted with the land use application showed an allowance of 1, 100 gallons /acre/day for infiltration and inflow. The allowance number should be increased to 1,500 gallons/ acre/day. 3. Sewer manhole should be located outside of the landscaped center island on Street B. 4. Any use in the buildings (kitchen, restaurant, etc. ) involving the handling of grease requires installation of a properly sized grease interceptor. 5. If the project proposes an indoor pool; the pool will need to be connected to the sanitary sewer system. 6. Storm drainage system within the indoor parking area shall be connected to an oil water separator and directed to the sewer system. 7. All buildings should be served by individual side sewers at a minimum. 8. Payment of system development charge fee and permit fee will be required at the time of issuance of the utility construction permit. Fees that are current at the time of issuance of the utility construction permit will be applicable on the project. 9. The Baxter lift station sewer Special Assessment District (SAD) fee will be applicable on the project. The base rate of this SAD fee is $166,421 with an interest of 5.3%. The rate as March 22, 2016 is $225,408.35 and will increase daily. This SDA fee rate will max out in July 2019. The rate that is current at the time of issuance of the utility construction permit will be applicable on the project. The payment will be due at the time of issuance of the utility construction permit. Storm water There is an existing 12 inch diameter stormwater line on North 42nd Place that ends near the west property line of the Quendall Terminals parcel. Since the internal streets of the development are private, the stom, water system for the development will be private. A stormwater covenant for allowing the City access to inspect the stormwater facility and assigning maintenance responsibility of the BMPs to the property owners will need to be recorded. The developer/ property owners/ HOA will be responsible for the maintenance of all stormwater systems constructed by the project. 1. A drainage plan and drainage report (TIR) based on the City of Renton Amendments to the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual should be submitted with the utility construction permit. The site is located in the Flow control Duration standard forested site conditions. The applicant is proposing to use the direct discharge exemption for the project. Water quality treatment is proposed for the project and should follow the requirements of the City of Renton Amendments to the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual. Storm water flow control BMPs are to be provided. All recommendations of the geotechnical report and the mitigation measures included in the final mitigation document should be followed in the design and construction of the project. 2. City of Renton has the Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater permit. Per the requirements of the Phase II permit, all projects that have been approved prior to January 1 2017 and have not started construction by January 1, 2022 shall follow the new Surface Water Drainage Manual. Therefore, if the project has not started construction by January 1, 2022, the requirements of the Stormwater Manual that is current at that time will be applicable on the project. 3. The stormwater requirements (1 to10) included in the memorandum dated September 14, 2009 from Ronald Straka, Surface Water utility Supervisor, included below along with the additional infomiation (a) and (b) are applicable on this project. The memorandum is Ran: April 12, 2016 Page 2 of ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUA09-151 enton PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Version 1 I ' Engineering Review Comments Contact: Rohini Nair I 425-430-7298 I mair@rentonwa.gov also included as an attachment. a. Projects approved prior to January 1, 2017 and have not started construction by January 1 2022, shall be subject to the requirements of the new Stormwater Manual that will be current at that time. b. Projects that comply with the exceptions included in Section 1.2.8 of the 2009 Surface Water Manual may provide basic water quality treatment instead of enhanced basic water quality treatment. 4. Payment of system development charge fee and permit fee will be required at the time of issuance of the utility construction permit. Fees that are current at the time of issuance of the utility construction permit will be applicable on the project. Transportation 1. Frontage improvements, including sidewalks, shall be provided along the west side of Lake Washington Boulevard and Ripley Lane N (Seahawks Way) along the site. These sidewalks shall connect to sidewalks to the north and south, which connect to other pedestrian facilities in the area. (Mitigation Measure G3.) 2. A crosswalk including pedestrian crossing warning signs at and in advance of the crosswalk shall be provided across Lake Washington Boulevard in order to connect the proposed development to the May Creek Trail on the east side of the Boulevard. The crosswalk shall be controlled by Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons, if the City determines that such lighting is warranted. (Mitigation Measure G9.) 3. A traffic mitigation/impact fee shall be determined and paid for the proposed development at the time of building permit issuance and in accordance with the City of Renton Municipal Code to help offset the impacts of the project on the City's roadways. (Mitigation Measure H 1.) 4. TOM measures shall be implemented to reduce the number of vehicle trips and thus provide some benefit to improving LOS and queuing impacts at study intersections. (Mitigation Measure H2.) 5. Infrastructure improvements within the site shall include full curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and landscape strips (where applicable) as well as frontage improvements (curb, gutter, sidewalk, landscape strips, bike lanes, pavement width, and utilities) along the west side of Lake Washington Boulevard and Ripley Lane N in front of the project site. Provisions for safe pedestrian circulation shall encourage future transit usage to and from the site when planned public transit becomes available. (Mitigation Measure H3.) 6. If approved by EPA and any NRD settlement, a pedestrian trail shall be provided onsite through the minimum 100 foot shoreline setback area that shall be accessible to the public and shall connect to Lake Washington Boulevard through the internal site sidewalk system. If EPA's ROD or any NRD settlement prohibits the trail, the trail shall be relocated to the west side of the westernmost buildings onsite, and could be combined with the fire access road; this trail shall connect to Lake Washington Boulevard through the internal site sidewalk system. (Mitigation Measure H4.) 7. To mitigate traffic impacts to the Lake Washington Boulevard corridor south of the development, the applicant shall install traffic calming treatments on Lake Washington Boulevard south of N 41 st Street to encourage primary trips generated by the project to utilize the l 405 corridor. Although the City of Renton has no adopted residential traffic management program, arterial calming measures could include treatments that create either horizontal or vertical deflection for drivers. Such treatments could include, but not limited to chicanes, serpentine raised curb sections, raised median treatments, speed tables, and/or speed humps. Final design of traffic calming elements shall be approved by the City. (Mitigation Measure H5.) 8. The parking supply under the Preferred Alternative shall meet the minimum off street parking requirements of the City of Renton. (Mitigation Measure H6.) 9. Shared parking agreements between on site uses and implementation of TOM measures for proposed residential uses shall be implemented to reduce parking demand during peak periods, thereby reducing the necessary parking supply. (Mitigation Measure H?.) 10. A fire access road shall be provided to the west of the westernmost buildings onsite. The road shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide, and shall be constructed with crushed rock or grass crete to support the weight of fire apparatus, and shall be available for emergency vehicle access. If located in the minimum 100 foot shoreline setback area, and approved by the EPA ROD and any NRD settlement, the road shall also serve as a pedestrian trail. If EPA's ROD or any NRO settlement prohibit the fire access road within the minimum 100 foot shoreline setback area, the road shall be relocated to the west side of the westernmost buildings onsite, and could be combined with the trail. (Mitigation Measure H8.) 11. In order to promote a multimodal transportation network, redevelopment on the Ouendall Terminals site shall include site amenities (i.e., planting strips, street lighting, etc.) and access to future transit zones on Lake Washington Boulevard and at the 1405/NE 44th Street interchange to encourage and accommodate public transportation access in the future (future potential public transportation in the vicinity could include Bus Rapid Transit on 1405 planned by Sound Transit and Washington State Department of Transportation {WSDOT) with a flyer stop at the 1405/NE 44th Street interchange). (Mitigation Measure H9.) 12. Staff recommends that a paved bicycle lane shall be provided along the east and west sides of Ripley Lane (Seahawks Way)/Lake Washington Boulevard from the end of the current bike trail along Ripley Lane to the intersection of Ripley Lane (Seahawks Way)/Lake Ran: April 12, 2016 Page 3 of 8 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUA09-151 -------Renton PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Version 1 Engineering Review Comments Contact: Rohini Nair I .425-430-7298 I. rhair@renfcmwa;g01: Washington Boulevard (Mitigation Measure H10.) 13. The developer should coordinate with WSDOT, King County, and the City of Renton to finalize the required lane, signal, and frontage improvements on Lake Washington Blvd, Ripley Lane (Seahawks Way), and Barbee Mill access. This co ordination and finalization of the street improvements and ROW requirements should take place before the site plan and the building/utility permit application is submitted to the City of Renton. All the street improvements included in the EIS, EIS Addendum, FEIS, and the mitigation document, to address the impacts of the project should be provided. Please see the figure titled 'Additional lanes required ta be provided to mitigate project Impacts' for information regarding the additional tum lanes and additional through motor vehicular traffic lanes on Lake Washington Blvd. Street improvements should be constructed by the developer. The required ROW dedications should be provided and or obtained by the developer. 14. Private access at the Barbee Mill Access Frontage improvements including landscaped planter and sidewalk matching the existing improvements on the west side of the access is required ta be provided on the east side of the access. 15. Private access at the Ripley Lane (Seahawks Way) 8 feet wide landscaped planter and 5 feet wide sidewalk is required to be provided on either side of the access. 16. For the scenario with 1405 improvements: a. Lake Washington Blvd bin Barbee Mill Access (N 43rd Street) and Ripley Lane N (Seahawks Way). The eastbound and westbound thru lanes planned by WSDOT shall be extended beyond and thru the Barbee Mill access intersection. This shall result in 2 thru lanes in each direction on Lake Washington Blvd from the 1405 interchange past the Barbee Mill access {N 43rd Street). b. Barbee MIii access (N 43rd Street)/ Lake Washington Blvd. Traffic signal shall be installed at the intersection. At the Barbee Mill Access (N 43rd Street) /Lake Washington Blvd intersection, the EB approach shall be widened to include a separate LEFT TURN only lane. 17. For the scenario without I 405 improvements: a. Traffic Signals. Traffic signals shall be installed at the intersections of the I 405 northbound and southbound ramp intersections, as well as at the intersection of Barbee Mill Access (N 43rd Street)/Lake Washington Boulevard. The City will consider moving the location of this signal ta the intersection at Ripley Lane/Lake Washington Boulevard as part of a future WSDOT improvement project ta the NE 44th Street interchange. Relocating the traffic signal ta Ripley Lane/Lake Washington Boulevard could reduce/eliminate potential longer range impacts of traffic queues on N 43rd Street between Lake Washington Boulevard and Road A, and with the existing rail crossing (should it be re activated far rail service or converted to a trail corridor). An engineering study will be completed at that time to support the determination of the location for the installation of the traffic signal at either N 43rd Street or Ripley Lane. (Mitigation Measure H 13.) b. Intersection #1 I 405 Northbound Ramps/NE 44th Street. The southbound and northbound approaches shall be widened so that a separate left tum lane and shared thru right tum lane is provided on both legs of the intersection. The final configuration of the intersection with the additional widening improvements shall be coordinated with WSDOT. (Mitigation Measure H14.) c. Mitigation measure H15 should be corrected to mention the widening on the eastbound approach on the Barbee Mill access instead of the previous typo that mentioned the westbound approach. [H15. Lake Washington Boulevard between Barbee Mill Access {N 43rd Street) and I 405 Southbound Ramps. Additional channelization improvements between the Barbee Mill access and the I 405 southbound ramps shall be constructed. Additional eastbound and westbound lanes shall be constructed to provide additional queue storage created by the traffic signals required at the southbound ramp and Barbee Mill Access (N 43rd Street) along Lake Washington Boulevard. At the Barbee Mill Access (N 43rd Street)/Lake Washington Boulevard intersection the eastbound approach on the Barbee Mill Access shall be widened to include a separate left tum only lane and the northbound approach on Lake Washington Boulevard shall be widened to include a separate left tum only lane. Ultimately, the City of Renton shall determine the best configuration for the improvements, given ongoing coordination with WSDOT on the adjacent interchange design, King County (owner of the vicinity rail right of way), and adjacent private development.] d. Lake Washington Boulevard between Barbee Mill Access (N 43rd Street) and I 405 Southbound Ramps. Additional channelization improvements between the Barbee Mill access and the I 405 southbound ramps shall be constructed. Additional eastbound and westbound lanes shall be constructed to provide additional queue storage created by the traffic signals required at the southbound ramp and Barbee Mill Access (N 43rd Street) along Lake Washington Boulevard. At the Barbee Mill Access (N 43rd Street)/Lake Washington Boulevard intersection the westbound approach on the Barbee Mill Access shall be widened to include a separate left tum only lane and the northbound approach on Lake Washington Boulevard shall be widened to include a separate left tum only lane. Ultimately, the City of Renton shall determine the best configuration for the improvements, given ongoing coordination with WSDOT on the adjacent interchange design, King County (owner of the vicinity rail right of way), and adjacent private development. (Mitigation Measure H15.} 18. All the mitigation measures of the Quendall Terminals Mitigation Document shall be applicable an the project and should be provided by the developer prior to temporary occupancy certificate is given for the first building in the site. 19. All the internal streets of Quendall Terminals site shall be private streets. 20. The proposed cross section of the internal streets should be revised as per the attached drawings and as per the description Ran: April 12, 2016 Page 4 of L ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUA09-151 PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use . Version 1 I .. Engineering Review Comments Contact: Rohini Nair I 425-430-72981 malr@rentonwa.gov included below. If the street pavement width is not sufficient to accommodate the utility lines with the required separation as per the City of Renton standards, then the street widths will have to be increased accordingly. a. Street A can have two cross sections depending on the use of the building on the side of the street. The cross section elements include i. Parking garage (residential use) near the street c 1 O feet wide landscaping near the parking garage building D 12 feet wide sidewalk with tree grate ( 4'x8') D 0.5 feet wide curb n 6 feet wide on street parking on one side of the street ::J 20 feet wide paved travel way (2 10 feet wide lanes) D 0.5 feet wide curb D 10 feet wide landscaping ii. No parking garage (retail use) near the street n 6 feet wide landscaping near the retail building ~ 12 feet wide sidewalk with tree grate ( 4'x8') J 0.5 feet wide curb D 6 feet wide on street parking on one side of the street L 20 feet wide paved travel way (2 10 feet wide lanes) C 0.5 feet wide curb D 10 feet wide landscaping An on site circulation study is required to be provided with the site plan to determine if the proposed 12 feet wide center tum lane is required. If the center turn lane is required, then the street width will have to changed accordingly. The width of landscaping near the property line is also subject to change based on the site circulation study and/or the proposed use of the building adjacent to Street A. b. Street B can have three cross sections depending on the use of the building on the side of the street. The cross section elements include i. No parking garage on either side of street B {retail use on both sides) O 15 feet wide sidewalk with tree grate {4'x8') D 0.5 feet wide curb c 8 feet wide on street parking on one side of the street c 24 feet wide paved travel way (2 12 feet wide lanes) D 8 feet wide on street parking on one side of the street D 0.5 feet wide curb '.J 15 feet wide sidewalk with tree grate {4'x8') ii. Parking garage {residential use) on one side of Street 8 C 10 feet wide landscaping near the parking garage building r::: 15 feet wide sidewalk with tree grate (4'x8') LJ 0.5 feet wide curb n 8 feet wide on street parking on one side of the street ·.J 24 feet wide paved travel way (2 12 feet wide lanes) :::J 8 feet wide on street parking on one side of the street r-:i 0.5 feet wide curb c 15 feet wide sidewalk with tree grate (4'x8') iii. Parking garage (residential use) on both sides of Street B o 10 feet wide landscaping near the parking garage building :::J 15 feet wide sidewalk with tree grate {4'x8') u 0.5 feet wide curb LJ 8 feet wide on street parking on one side of the street [ 24 feet wide paved travel way (2 12 feet wide lanes) C 8 feet wide on street parking on one side of the street Ran: April 12, 2016 Page5of8 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUA09-151 PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use E11glneeririg Review,Comrnents C 0.5 feet wide curb o 15 feet wide sidewalk with tree grate (4'x8') D 10 feet wide landscaping near the parking garage building --------Renton~ Version·; Contact: Rohini Nair I 425-430-7298 I mair@rentonwa.ge c. Street C can have three cross sections depending on the use of the building on either sides of the street. The cross section elements include: i Parking garage (residential use) on both sides of Street C ::1 10 feet wide landscaping near the parking garage D 6 feet wide sidewalk D 0.5 feet wide curb o 6 feet wide on street parking lane on one side D 20 feet wide paved travel way (2 10 feet wide lanes) LJ 6 feet wide on street parking lane on one side c 0.5 feet wide curb o 6 feet wide sidewalk o 1 O feet wide landscaping near the parking garage ii Parking garage (residential use) on one side of Street C o 10 feet wide landscaping near the garage =i 6 feet wide sidewalk on the side near the garage =i 0.5 feet wide curb o 6 feet wide on street parking lane on one side D 20 feet wide paved travel way (2 10 feet wide lanes) o 6 feet wide on street parking lane on one side rJ 0.5 feet wide curb o 12 feet wide sidewalk on the side away from garage D 4 feet wide landscaping back of sidewalk on the side away from garage iii No parking garage on any side of the street (retail use on both sides) C 4 feet wide landscaping near the building o 12 feet wide sidewalk u 0.5 feet wide curb o 6 feet wide on street parking lane on one side n 20 feet wide paved travel way (2 10 feet wide lanes) D 6 feet wide on street parking lane on one side o O .5 feet wide curb D 12 feet wide sidewalk :J 4 feet wide landscaping back of sidewalk d. Street D cross section elements include: :J 1 O feet wide landscape setback D 0.5 feet wide curb D 20 feet wide paved travel way (2 1 O feet wide lanes} D 0.5 feet wide curb o 6 feet wide sidewalk c 5 feet wide landscaping between back of sidewalk and parking lot e. Street E cross section elements include: c 1 O feet wide landscaping on the side near the parking garage c 6 feet wide sidewalk D 0.5 feet wide curb o 20 feet wide paved travel way (2 10 feet wide lanes) o 0.5 feet wide curb on the side near the property line Ran: April 12, 2016 Page 6 of l ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUA09-151 -------Renton PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Version 1 I Engineering Review Comments Contact: Rohini Nair I 425-430-7298 I mair@rentonwa.gov :J 5 feet landscape setback from property line If portions of Street E will have parking on both sides, then alternate street cross sections will be required for those portions of Street E. 21. If the required minimum separation between utility lines need wider pavement width, then the street width should be changed accordingly. 22. Street lighting is required to be provided on all streets. The street lighting can follow the City of Renton's residential street lighting requirements. Since the streets are private, the street lighting shall be privately owned and maintained by the developer/ property owner/ HOA. 23. Parking garage entrances should be designed with consideration of sight distance. 24. The proposed project has passed the City of Renton's traffic concurrency test. A traffic concurrency report has been provided for the project. 25. An easement with King county for access, and an agreement with King County for construction of frontage improvements over King County owned railroad right of way should be provided to the City prior to site plan review application and construction permit application. General Comments 1. All construction or service utility permits for drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. When utility plans are complete, please submit four (4) copies of the drawings, two (2) copies o_f the drainage report, permit application, an itemized cost of construction estimate, and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. 3. All electrical, phone, and cable services and lines serving the proposed development must be underground. The construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and annroved bv a City of Renton inspector prior to temoorary certificate of occupanr.v . . Community Services Review Comments Contact Leslie Betlaoh I 425-430-66191 LBeHaoh@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT COMMENTS (from Community Services) 1. As per the Final EIS (Aug. 2015) and the Mitigation document (Aug. 2015), the revised plan sheets do not reflect the crosswalk across Lake Washington Blvd. as per Mitigation G 9 Condition. 2. As per the final EIS (Aug. 2015} and the Mitigation Document (Aug. 2015), the revised plan sheets do not reflect the Trail connection within the 100' shoreline setback south to the Barbe Mill Development as per G 11 Mitigation Condition. ·• .·. Planning Review Comments Contact: Vanessa Dolbee I 425-430-73141 vdolbee@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: 1. RMC section 4 4 030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 2. Commercial, multi family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 4. A National Permit Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required when more than one acre is being cleared. 5. This permit is shall comply with the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. The permitted is responsible for adhering to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Bald Eacle Manaciement Guidelines (2007' and /or your U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service permit. Building Review. Planning Comments Contact: Craig Burnell I 425-430-7290 I cbumell@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: follow recommendations of the soils report Ran: April 12, 2016 Page7 of8 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUA09-151 -----~Renton® PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Version Technical Services Comments Contact Amanda Askren I 425-430-7369 I aaskren@rentonwa.ge•.· Recommendations: For the preliminary binding site plan review: Updated title report not provided. Submitted title report for May 2009. The dedication of land for street purposes on binding site plans requires approval by the City Council. Said dedication is achieved via a recorded City of Renton Dedication Deed document (form is provided by the city). If the dedication is to be recorded with the binding site plan, the dedication process needs to be timed in such a way that Council approval and all other matters pertaining to the dedication have been addressed and resolved, and said document is ready to record. The Deed of Dedication document includes both a legal description exhibit and a map exhibit. The legal description exhibit should be prepared, stamped, dated and signed by the applicant's surveyor. The surveyor should also prepare the map exhibit. The dedication process requires an updated title report, to be dated within the 45 days prior to Council action on said dedication. Talk to the Pro·ect Manager if there are questions or further information is needed. Ran:April 12, 2016 Page 8 o ' ! l ! l l I f ! s: \ \ \ \ I I \ ~ i 0Ml8'I MU !HTRY-~ •• p. !lf'.Loc,,rro:'fliTO · ~ EDG:E(f"N~WIIB(TW) \_Ei·ll'-Y{l2<1 ----------------__ ., ·-___ ·:,l; -----ffiESSURE ZM). ------ "' WATER NOTES: All NEW ~o RflOCllID FlRE: w,r,1aNr; ~I/Ji BE IH '.:Jfl s:ANDAR[I Pll~ 8IIJI lll PROPl.1'5ED Will~ MMNS AR€ lOCATEO WlllilN 111[ 320 PR«,"9.JRf 7ll.'E llEXiEll u11ur1 C(f!NECTIONS 'llfil BE IJSCD BET'ilffN 51llUCllJRI.D BUllil<NGS /.HO IJ!IS1"1JCnJR{~ STE AREA$ TQ MJNIIIZE 1'l: RISK 0: DAMAG!: TO u11un[S DUE 10 l~lf[REtl~II!_ 'lTlll~ENT LEGEND: lilECIWIC,IL SDMCt ROOM: ~ ,l){M ~v. !£JIB AIW RP8A ~ ,flREOOCVl • , ACCBS Dl)(j! FROl,I OUl'SlDE •FDC 00 8UlD1NG FlCE FIREC'rllR~T ... a::a:::;-::a::a: Fll~NCHff UllJTl' DUCT 0.ofi~ (C(JII~. Gl,S, POll£R) [ff=~2.~ ~~ISHED f1.Ctt illV!.TI(II DRA~8¥ OCSllJIEOB¥1~===~ -~-.c;;,;··;;,>.,i,iR.,.-,.,.-,,,~{,''~'i: M~<>e'> M""-"' " u;-'1¢--!cl( -"""''' er =~·>'' n""" O'CnI'.l'< -~•~ b-,.., <•1':lS ---·' ~ ~J CAU 1WO Blli!G IHJJ([D 8¥ /.f'PRD,W 8¥ MY'S JJ[i[ YOO Ir; lqJff WTJ DAT[ ~Av • 1-roH2MS55 R['~~D FH MITICATI~ RHfJIROl[IHS NOV 16 ' ?OOg S C A L E 1601 ~"-·'"'" 1«<) <,-aotle WA .. 001 """'·""" _ ........... .O.PPR REl.1SION J O B No. , '500050 .O.S NOT\ 0 r---- 1 ti I a ~ ! -1:):151 1~· ,/ MERCE~ ISUJID .,,. ~ElRC "lv.rn ,irJ :1 ln~ // •--~-, -,1--1-· -w ·---·--· ·-'--·-~- EX·lt' .II SH/IJ.J. Bf:-~T lHS_l ~· -1 ·. ' --ll BMl.'itR • -.-" lll«R nNl~ED <J<llll. er rniJ' · un ..-rlllON ROI.!!~.> I)!~~~ .lJ'Ts'f~ -o,:;aiM_Gi:.:,=·:::c::.....·:.::: > ~~.,__-~-~~::~_CQ~-~r ~l ~TROSO:A ~ -- ~,// • , ~" -"l" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION QUENDALL TERWIHALS ~ WE W~"' ~LIV""°, ROOOH, Wo\SHll«ITOtl LAND USE, SHORELINE & MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION CONCEPTUAL UTILITY PLAN SHEET C400 ' ! l ! J l I J I l ! ' , )l ~,'-------.;_·:~ r:.:t)1 \lU-'1 [~ ' ' . =i:::' ' -, ' '·, /\\~. * \-./.~_-\., ( ) /. ~ -./ ~ . .. //. . --~ ... -> \ ---- \ /, \ I' "' \ / \___,, \// ' ,'\~_: ~~,-~ WATER NOTES: 1U MEW ml) '1ElOCAlID f'.ll[ H'r!lfll.NfS ~IU EE POI CVR STOOl,Rll Pl.AN 8'02 AU PROPOSEll \IIATl]l Ml"'1S ARE LOCAlID IU"N TH[ J10 PRESSlff ZOil flDJfllf UTILJT'f C();H[Clll)IS SWU BE USED BETI\UN STRLJCTIJREU 0011.m!CS I.Ill) lt/STRUCTIJRUl Sil[ All[AS 10 lllNr.lll[ Tl'l' !l!SI( IT Dl,MAG[ TO UTIIJTI[S 00[ TO ~FfERENTll,l SETllI~ENT Lilllli1: MECHAHICAL SDMCE IIOOII: ~ •DCIIPRV.~ANOllPB~ ~ ,All{ OOCVA •ACU'SS !IOOR FRQ.I ()Jlmlf. • fDC Cf! 8\!ILDIN~ FACE A nRC H'r!lRANT '"' -=-=-FllANCHSE Ullin' DIJCT SANK [COMM, GAS. PO\IER) lff=J25I Rffi'.'l-l[[) Fl.Offi lllVATICJ:I :DRA-.11 BY "'" OC~IJ-CO BY ~-lffl!O,t[l BYI O£OID a, '" ~~DATE '" I~ om s, '"' APPR RE\UII PER MlllGATICII 111:00IREMENTS RE\/lSION NOV 16, 2009 JOB h'o. :1500050 (ji[ llllffl~ ~~ ~II[ YOO II, HIHH!I 5 C A L E AS NOTED lq,ff -·-- NL w,,:J'ER MkNS Mic' nEL.ATED ll~''""'PM~CcS '.STJ,.L_U "''"'''* r,,~ S•Te s, ,._L ~, '" ~ccor<).''1CC ,..,-,,, H, ~,!Jl.,,·,,c,.,r,.~:,; Of ,,~ 0:"A~ J\P~ROl'F.Q Pl.Ali h)~ :\.'i1fJ.I.AH!". ~'?F~"W'l~ !\("l'<'F.NA"\,(. AN(! M(1'l"Cq V} ~. Nl Q< \,1 .'T.'.':, WAkR WIINS "l-1.<ll. i"f.' P!A<;rn -~ CLlA"< FIL" M/1.'C.c\.AI.~. ,~" r~,,.~~ W Ff St J: ,·:,,i· W•l'.T'-•tJl' m:~= 'l'' .1 :o < rr:,· n,·, ,m 1 1:· •NV'"H :;r T;J~ w;:rfrl c+iF.fllONQ WITH A'; "CCFrTAlll S ~A'<'<'F~ TO r~FVF'l'f "~t:e.>,:M}IH'."10~ 0' -HF C,F•·: !'I!' '.1AT'~-N t'ICf<·';~~ ,,:, tro··e,.-T~~ WATE~ t,,i.!JNS FR>I' f,0NT'-"'1NA"~'J>, M'ICI Tf.: "c_c1;, r.,r~~E l,l\·'<TE.,A..,G~ (JC"Te·E \\'A"~9 W.l~S av HE ,;,-.-, ~N ('111 l[Y ~-".:>CM cm A-~,, P,W/11',NAtj<;"c .;oHc~w~-,! .,., 1'-i 1~s-. Ci'Y (!> ~C.~'0'. W ,.1. ,SC"~,~~-~~.; h)~ ,>;', \'~.:.ld,ANU Ali.' c~ ''}i\f. l<\.""Nl(C. [,jc WA'E,1 ~:N~$ hllH'N rm 51"f_ '~E :,r,c,rc-:l'f C,,.~·~-,, /h cc ·lc~C·O'\~l!JC~ CO>< ~·_L ~m, ., fa[L Al W ·O ·,-~ f ~~A\·~: r,~ r:,-,;,_)¥ft• A~·) o•sro~~LC1CM!•Tl'f11/.LS ~NO Cf'~ :,,';A, 'lC~V"A',Vef,'j ~·.~nr.:t.~[:, W"'l-1 ·1·r (,'TY :;0pc~1,-1()'.j 'dit!~rW',1,;[ f,1:1' Rr~,.I~ :0 ··,: w,:,~ .. ~:s wni-1,,;r:,~~rr; ' \ '\. 'G I I I f ~ ~/ " . . NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OUENDAll TERWINALS ~ LAKE WASMHGTOII IIOUIIV.UO, RENTON, WASlflfGTON LAND US[, SHOR[LINE & MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION CONCEPTUAL UTILITY PLAN SHEET C401 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: September 14, 2009 SEP 182009 TO: Arneta Henninger, Plan Reviewer FROM: ,/~ u4--Ronald l Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor QUENDALL TERMINALS STORMWATER REQUIREMENTS SUBJECT: Please see my comments below regarding the drainage report and plans, dated August 27, 2009, for Quendall Terminals. 1. The project shall be required to comply with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) standards as a condition of SEPA. 2. A compete TIR for the project site will be required with submittal of the civil engineering plans for the site that includes all information required by the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual. This includes information related to satisfying all core requirements and applicable special requirements in the 2009 KCSWDM 3. The proposed projects must submit an offsite analysis report that assesses potential offsite drainage and water quality impacts associated with development of the project site and proposes appropriate mitigation of those impacts. 4. The report must include a KCRTS printout of all land use input values for pre-and post-developed impervious and pervious areas. The report should also include a basin summary table for the existing condition and developed condition land use. The basin summary table should identify the wetlands. 5. The wetland area needs to be included in the pre-and post-developed time series analysis. 6. Since the project will result in more than 5,000 square feet of new impervious surface, the project must comply with section 1.2.3 of the 2009 KCSWDM Flow Control. The direct discharge exemption may apply to the project if it meets all of the following criteria: a. The flowpath from the project site discharge point to the edge of the 100-year floodplain of the major receiving water will be no longer than a quarter mile. b. The conveyance system between the project site and the major receiving water will extend to the ordinary high water mark, and will be comprised Henninger/Quendall Terminal Stormwater Requirements Page 2 of 2 September 14, 2009 of manmade conveyance elements (pipes, ditches, etc.) and will be within public right-of-way or a public or private drainage easement c. The conveyance system will have adequate capacity per Core Requirement #4, Conveyance System, for the entire contributing drainage area, assuming build-out conditions to current zoning for the equivalent area portion and existing conditions for the remaining area d. The conveyance system will be adequately stabilized to prevent erosion, assuming the same basin conditions as assumed in Criteria (c) above. NOTE: The major receiving waters do not include wetlands. 7. The engineer proposes to discharge runoff from the north and west portions of the site into the wetlands located at the north and west corners of the site. The engineer needs to conduct an analysis of the wetland to determine the existing hydrology, including the hydroperiod, and base the recharge on that analysis. Typically, the wetland report would include a recommendation from the biologist as to the proper recharge rate. 8. The proposed roadway improvements shall be taken into consideration when calculating the post development site condition and sizing the water quality and flow control facilities, if required. 9. The project will be required to provide enhanced water quality treatment per section 1.2.8.1. Application of the Enhanced Basic Water Quality menu may be waived for treatment of any runoff that is discharged entirely by pipe all the way to the ordinary high water mark to the major receiving waters, listed on pages 1- 37 of the 2009 KCSWDM. Enhanced Basic Water Quality treatment is required for any discharges to the existing wetlands on site. 10. Does the project have an expected average daily traffic (ADT) count of 100 or more vehicles per square feet of gross building area, per section 1.2.8.1 of the 2009 KCSWDM? If yes, the project must provide oil control in addition to any other water quality facility required. If you have any questions contact Hebe Bernardo, Surface Water Utility Engineer (x7264). cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director Kayren Klttrlck, Development Engineering Supervisor Chip Vincent, Planning Director Nell Watts, Development Seivices Director h:\file sys\swp -surface water projects\swp 27-surface water projects {plan review)\quendall terminals\first review.doc\HBaw ; ' ' t . . t ' Ov I ~ -o 1'; I I ~.· 1. Introduction Quendall Terminals is a proposed mixed-use development in Renton, Washington. The development includes five stories of residential or office space above two levels of above-grade parking or retail and restaurant space. The development project anticipates entitlement of the following: Table 1·1: Proposed Development Use I Quantity/ Area Residential 800 Units Office 245,000 Square Feet Retail . 21,600 Square Feet . . Restaurant , 9,000 Square Feet Parking i 2,215 Spaces Note: All areas shown are gross building areas (GBA}. The project site is located west of Interstate 405 near the northern city limits of Renton. The site is bounded by the Seahawks Training Facility to the north, BNSF railroad tracks to the east, and the Barbee Mill residential community to the south. Ripley Lane is located east of the BNSF railroad tracks and Lake Washington Boulevard is located southeast of the project site. See Figure 1 in the Appendix for the site location. This report is intended to support City of Renton entitlement processing for Master Site Plan Approval. The scope of this report is to address the sanitary sewer system for the proposed development. · Design criteria will be outlined and a sewerage approach will be evaluated. 2. Predeveloped Site Conditions The existing site is vacant and is the former location of a log sorting and storage yard. The main site is approximately 20.30 acres in size, and the parcel east of the main project site across Ripley Lane North is approximately 1.15 acres in size. An existing 12-inch sanitary sewer main runs from south to north along the east side of the site within a 60-foot roadway and utility easement. The invert elevation of the existing sewer pipe is generally 10 to 13 feet below the existing ground surface. The existing Baxter Lift Station serves Quendall Terminals as well as the Seahawks Training Facility to the t: north and Barbee Mill to the South. There are no other sewers located on the project site. An 84-inch Metro sewer main Is located approximately 100 feet east of the site's east property line. See Figure 2 1n the Appendix for existing site conditions. _ __,--(Mtt-_k.:"-~., A /.Gµ&~~~µ ~~ ~-7t-tft'tl.lt1..f[Y OF 711¢:~ ~e€/SY 4)-(£~ I , CenturyPaciflc, LP Quendall Terminals 2 :, ' f. . . '"l!r!lll ' f,,_,.. /J f '•U 3. Developed Site Conditions The proposed site Improvements include a mixed-use development consisting of residential, office, retail, and restaurant uses, as well as new public and private streets and parking. Sewer mains will be constructed within the proposed pubJjc streets. Sewage from the buildings will discharge to the new sewer mains via side sewers. The new sewer mains will discharge to the existing 12-·lnch sewer main at the east side of the project site at a new manhole constructed over the existing main. No improvements are planned for the 1.15-acre parcel east of Ripley Lane. See Figures 3 and 4 in the Appendix for proposed site plan and proposed sewer plan, respectively. 4. Basis of Design An on-site sanitary sewer system will collect and convey flows from Quendall Terminals. Adjacent sites are already developed and served by separate sanitary sewer systems. This report has utilized programmed project areas and Department of Ecology (DOE) criteria to establish projected sewer flows without provisions for future growth or connections. See Figures 3 and 4 in the Appendix for proposed site plan and proposed sewer plan, respectively. Gross building areas have been used for this report An allowance of 1,100 gallons/acre/day (gpad) has been made for infiltration and inflow since the proposed sanitary sewer system is expected to be below seasonal high groundwater elevations. The 1.15-acre parcel east of Ripley Lane has not been incl~ded in the Infiltration calculation. · A peaking factor of 4.0 was included in the design flows. This factor should account for the daily and seasonal fluctuations in waste generation. This factor should also mitigate the impact of the varying flow generations for the different uses proposed with this project The sanitary sewer system was designed to convey the estimated peak flows by gravity to the project discharge location at a new manhole installed on an existing City of Renton sanitary sewer pipe. The sewer capacities were established using Manning's Equation, with an "n" factor of 0.013. Sewer lines have been designed using the minimum slope requirements of the Washington State DOE. The pipe slopes used in the final design and future construction documents may be greater than the minimum slope to accommodate potential settlement, depending on the recommendation of the geotechnlcal engineer. 2 CenturyPaclflc, LP Quendall Terminals , , , , r " . {i l!IJlll ·" Lv-1, ., I I' •· EXISTING BAXTER LIFT STATION The Baxter Lift Station is an existing sewer lift station located at the northeast corner of the project site within a sanitary sewer easement The lift station was designed in 2006 and was constructed in 2009. The lift station was designed for an overall peak flow of 594 gpm for the Seahawks Training Facility, Barbee Mill community, and the Quendall Terminals site. The lift station was designed and constructed with the following assumptions for future development of the Quendall Terminals site: Table 5-3: Lift Station Design Assumptions for Quendall Terminals (per Figure 6) Developable Acres 5 T r!b utary Area 5.0 Acres Flow Rate 2,800 gpad Number of Units 75 Tributary Area 3.0 Acres Persons/Unit 2.4 Flow Rate 100 gpad Average Sewerage Flow 22.2 gpm Design 1/1 Rate 1,500 gpad Peaking Factor 4 Design Sewage F!ow 88.9 gpm Design 1/1 Flow 8.3 gpm Total Design Flow 97.2 gpm Total Design Flow Q peak hourly The sewer lift station was designed for a flow of 97.2 gpm from the Quendall project sirn. The anticipated flow from the Quendall project site is 614 gpm. The sewer lift station capacity will need to be increased by approximately 517 gpm to 1,111 gpm to accomm~date d·evefop-ment iifthe Quendall Terminals site. Per discussion with the City of Renton Public Works, the existing l_ift station has the ability to be modified to increase capacity by changing pump impellers and increasing the wet well capacity. -{;ee Figure 6 in the Appendix for Baxter Lift Station design details and Figure 7 for a record of discus,;ilon with the City. I . LUo.._,~~&-1~--r~~i~1U-~~..)1~/t..-- V\i\:e.:~-,~~ ~ "lo ~< F"-Aet t:;I..V--l ~ 60<~1u.¥~ ~v' Aw~~-~ 1ft6tli€J,~ t?it;:-~ L--HJ...~--l?A "K>\.-v~7'-5 ~-~~~~ h~-M~~~- ~urcfWk., 6~ Ari~ ~bt-L i.J;w t ~ /_µr&~~ ~ tuw_? A-r"t~ ~~ _;y-~ \J;,;.,LM..-~"' --r~ -. t.0, \A,.;~ ~J'.?L~~~-t~~ ,0 4 • OUier available options are Installing larger pumps but Dave did not believe that would be necessary as the existing pumps were specifically chosen to allow impeller modifications as they anticipated the need for additional capacity in the future. Fees: • Quendall has recenijy been assessed a capacity charge of $166k for their "fair share" of the Baxter Pump Station. This assessment was based on 111gpm of capacity. I asked Dave if future assessments would be required if the flows exceeded the 111 gpm. Dave indicated there would be NO additional capacity charge assessments for the Quendall site only mechanical pump station upgrades ;:;;~;o~ee~l~~e~~ ~i~ 9oi~C-~-G~... --------·---------- KPFF Consulting Engjneers Page2 Telephone Record November 17. 2009 Figure 7 KPFF Consulting Engineers BUILDING USE AND DISCHARGE POINT PER TRIBUTARY AREA Trlb. Area ID Resid. Office Retail Rest. 0jsc/1arge To !UNITS] [SF] [SF] [SF] NE Ttib. Area ~ 0 '117500 4000 0 Reach 3 SETrib. Area 175 107500 4500 0 Reach 2 ~ SW Trib, Area 1 ~ 360 0 0 0 Roach 2 SWTrib. Area 2 1----------- 90 10000 6300 4500 Reach 4 NW Ttlb, Area 1 100 0 --0 a Reach 3 NWTrib. Atea 2 75 10000 6000 4500 Rea<"J1 4 Total 800 245000 21600 9000 Reach 1 BUILDING USE PER REACH Reach ID Re6id. Office Rel:.a.il Rest. Rest. [UNITS] [SF] [SF] [SF] [SEATS3] Reach 1 800 245000 21500 9000 396 - Reach 2 535 107500 4500 0 0 -~ Reach 3 100 117500 4800 0 0 Reach 4 165 20000 12300 9000 396 INFILTRATION/INFLOW ~ /;3?,{) A:, 677-<-,_./._ - I Site Size [AC] I Flrrw r~Pnu.nf ih:., rr.:.Du1 I __.,,,-~ 20.3 PIPE CALCULA T/ONS Reach JD Upstrm. MH Downstrm. MH Ler'lgth Inner Dia Upstrm. IE Downstrm. IE [FT] flN] [FT] [FT] REACH 1 SSMH #2 SSMH #1 335 ,2 19.23 18.49 REACli 2 C-----·· SSMH #3S-2 SSMH #3S-1 276 a 21.88 '20.77 SSMH #3S-1 SSMH#2 278 ~ 8 20.67 19.56 ~--1-------· REACH3 SSMH #3N SSMH #2 34() 8 20.92 rn.56 REACH4 SSMH#3W SSMH#2 271 8 20.64 19.56 November, 2009 UNIT FLOW AND PEAK FACTOR PER BUILDING USE Use Unit Flow1 [GPDl Paak Factor Residential f-------175 (per unitz] 4 Ottice 0.2 [per sq ~l_ 4 ~-~ Retan 0.3 (per sq ft] 4 Restauranh 50 perseat] 4 "• ( 11 00 I Der acre] 1 /~6 NOTES 1 Unit flows include normal infiltraUon b A.swmes 1.75 residents per ltnit p Restaurant conversion: 1 se.it "'22.7 square feet of restaurant lnfiltratlon due to high groundwater FLOW PER REACH Reach ID ResK:I. Office Re.fail Rest. 1/1 - [GPMJ [GPMJ [GPM] [GPMJ [GPMJ Reach 1 389 136 16 55 16 ReaGh 2 260 60 4 0 4 Reach 3 49 65 4 0 4 --- Reach 4 80 11 10 55 4 Slope n o., QM 0..arJi;n %Cap. [FT/FT] [CFS] [GPM] [GPMJ 0.0022 0.013 1.68 754 614 81% 0.0040 0.013 0.77 344 328 95% 0.0040 0.013 0.77 344 326 95% ----- 0.0040 0.013 0_77 344 122 35% ---- 0.0040 0.(113 0.76 343 161 47% -- Total [GPM] 614 328 122 161 v,., Origin of Flow [FPS] REACH 2, REACH 3, ~EACH 4 2.14 - -SE Trib. Area, SW Trib. A!.ea._1 2.19 2.19 - NE Trib. Area, NW Trib. Area 1 -- 2.20 - -- SW Trib. Area 2, NW Tfib. Area~ 2.19 Quendall Terminals Sewer Report Figure 5: Calculations -·~ ----·· -------~-----. -----_____ ._ .. _ .. -~· ) '· ' ' ' 0 i ' _\ l l ~ l ' ' W; \-\/~\. \\ 'j" -" \ "'· .•, "-"fw-' , -I -· . \ ·'(r,·-- \,(\\, ,-" '\ ,4,~?'':,-------p; _ R"l;l~!tO ll'fll ... , ,,. \ \ .. ~, ')'fi oc.,,.~n•," -~ '._ \ , -.. . _,\ \\(.) \~\·.,c'~, ... \,~ \\ "'11-,-'i;. NOTE.$,;. ,.,.,,\\ \ .<".). \\ \\~w r '\\'\'.· 'i\\::::~ ~.~ .i,., \\}ef§) '\ ', \ ' SAA!H 11!1.~ onr . . ., " ' E!f,"Jl()'j~EllT/J, sl'VOAn(III M•m 111-..C,il~(III iJ ll( f'IO)fHI''" WU K l.xJll'J'..lU) ~.:W 10 f'l'/[JJ'lll'.N\ TH[ (N\1!l~ri!Ac F'K"'t:mJtl Al.Bl:\ {£PAI IS "a~E cf.\!) ~::iNtY ro; m Wi F,£ll(D'•"l,')I-I >NC' ~TCI.T')ll Af'):)jS 'IM:;H 1$.f. TC· 0C PEi!F<)lll,[C ;r T-E (ll,Cr:t>!.J.L 1U"l,ll~"1.~ n: J!(l[I' SUm>flJII['. 1 •ml;l)N:, ~llll'NI) mJ l)lil,JI; t<'1V~IIOO<; i.w f>J>Nr; M•Y i¥. P'"<J'J'i>''° PRIVATE ACCESS -+ s1v~·,~·w ~·~'~"~-- n'!RU-Cl~1J e;in ~TUM!'W!TS (l1F; ,.J } It E _c3fo "DT!:~fA\ R':TM!-r!(. "Nl R i11,I 1•·, -, , . I 1 / ,--1 l'.! u I ',l!l(JN;~. ~;-.;I·'·.··, ·,, Ant·l 11. CTH'!~ TI",1•J o•;,f .~ 1Y !' './ ., 11' 1· -r--....... -...... '-.._ ' mv.m :o<;:·,/"'tTs ~ ., ?y/ - ,, _J \ ---' --_jj_ __ c~~=-~~~~~=--===--=-------o-=-------------------:: • ~SH/Nero ~ ---RI~! LANE ~ --.!'.!_1, 0 ·-_ . ------.--_ '" ---- TE ·C ---.,,,,,/ / i <, s fl•XBl\! cnwr WlN'C~i'.W'i '.l'ltJi. Hf v~ !lfl#U ~NJCTllf!W Bt,!'J>tNc> r.,u ~llll>'.~.;,:,rn ,rr: 1.•1ns 10 wlMl.i1;:i: 'HI: Vi<: OF ~AW>'l r•:• U'.'J.1[5 c,,c ro Dl!TCROITI,L 5ElU~::Nl ALL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDED AS MITIGATION MEASURES IN THE QUENDALL TERMINALS MITIGATION DOCUMENT ARE APPLICABLE AND SHOULD BE PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER. • < " NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION )/.r.: PEV15;0N ·~ ,)A'] f!E',F.,:O PE~ r.lFl(..,1'10', REQl./'f'[IIEHlS NOV 1~. 2009 " '"' A~F~ JO tt N, ·11\11!1:i!,(> 00 IIO IISlllS DIHTllllWlt _1-800_-_lll_,5555_ S C A L E >.S NC\'1'() lq,ff '"''''''"'""' ~~,!-""'~·"'"'""· .... u,.un. ~ ....... - OUENDAU. TERMINALS 4350 LAKE WASHIHGTOM EIOOLEVAIIO, RDfTON, WASHHmlll LANO USE, SHORELINE &: MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION CONCEPTUAL STORM DRAINAGE ANO GRADING PLAN \;,u:r C300 f ; t l ! I ' ¥ l ' >~. lAKE WASHINGTON ------------. ------------- -------.f;:.-·~ . -, ~OOIARr HIG!+ '1M EI.EVa1867 _ ~!BARK (llt-l'Nll)'\ SEINOlrl&Z \ ,-:,Q'Cffl'IIS[TDAC~ )T~(c-~A,, _.; ----fa' V .~ ·---. ,. \ ::CC-S[, ,~-~~:i .. '. ·.)i 1 . -• . ~ STc;lUFl_tl/ ~~ , ! Pll{S[TI\IIG , 1·' VNJLl I • , -----i • I -·, ~ I ----·. ' ' \ ~ '--' ITTI'. ENltR{ >ROO[U~ ~ \ ,...--CIJTfAU WTII \ '-... , ' .. ~.•ors .SIPAnCfi 1 1 '-. .. \_.. · .-~ '/· _\ ../-·-- • .\ \. _ _J 1-1'~ \ [ '---\ ', \ . ' \'. V; \ \\ .;~-- -------~-·---,.. ;:--- '~ 11 f. ~ \\-\< c~--_?'---• \ \ ~-~ \C-· • "I am ;:;;·c.J \ ' ··-;-_ IIQAYPASS \'\· -~--=-.... \ ,:-1 · ~ ~\L ,~ '-I: =-= ·--cc I• i" :~- , ~ v~-"' -1,, mm, n••a.c '"' . \ • ~~ • -h !'011 ~---~~-~-~ LEGEND: NOTES; DlSTIIG ~TW,IJ (SU: NOT£ J] . ,---..___ - EN\IRONMEHTAL RElJEOIATillll AllD M!TIGATIOO ll' Tl£ PRO'El!lY iWl.L B£ CCeNDVC1Ul PRlc!ll 10 DE:IUCt'M(NI. M EH\/TfK'l!MEIHAL PROTECTION !fJ_Nl:Y (FT-A) IS !Ht L[/J) l,(:£NC1' f()!I Ill SIIE Rfll{n!AOON A'fll :::::::J _J COHCO'TUIJ. \11:UND CR[ATIONi1!EST-:JRATillll (SIT NOT( J) ijl ~GA TIOM ACTIONS ~l,:tj /IR( 18 B£ P[RflJRl,IUJ AT lH <JJUWALl T[llMl~Al.S SHI U~DER SIJflRFUNO 2 mr PR<llCT SIT( ltCLLIDES Af'PRQ)lMAlILY 1,5113 m:r Of '.11C1!ELII£ /.!(JIG LIKE 11.•SH'NCTOH. ~ IOO-FOOT WDTH Rll'.oi!IAN SElll~CII [\/£,\SURED FROM IH[ OODIN/Jll HIGH ,Al[II liW!K) AND PIJlAJ.ilLS ALCl'!G TI-tr SHORELINE. A SHORELINE R!:STO:W::AOON PLAN IS ~NG DESIGNED AND APl'PO\([l lMOEF [?A DIRlCTION l E~S"IN[; lllllANIJS 00 \:W~EPTUA!. IUL.INJ C!l[~TIJN/ff.Sl[)IAIION AAEAS SHO'I!'< ~Al'E NOT REC£1\([I RNIJ. [PA lllSICN APl'f!Ol'OJ... IJ)l)l~[)NIJ. BUILDIHG IID:l-Oft/I!~ COHIIECTIONS ANO PIPING MAY OE Pl urnRrn ~ fl.(Xll)li UTIL'TT' CCNN[CTICfiS SHfil 8( IJS[I) E!El'Tlt!:N STR1Xlll1!ID \ltll'_(JING'i I.Ill UNS1l1JC1URE0 SITE AAEAS TO ~:~t,i>ZE: ™f 1!1').'. rl l)A~AGE TO Ulltm:s 00( TO DIITTRENTIIJ. S[TI1.,_,l[N1 l I I 1w,~~,m"' I I .. I t:5:'~~''' _l_i_/J0/15 •t,i,iu l'LI< Ml''-~TION REOOID~__!2 " DA~E " 000 APFR REVISION JO 8 No. :ISOOOSO Cl!llllllliB ~~ ITTOI£ !00 1G 1-!ll-l2_1-II~ SCALE: AS NOTED lqJff "'"' ''""""""·"''""" ,....,,_..,, www ............ .OOTFI.U.Mll!~ [r;(RITT~'FAllllll ".. -__.:,.,;.-- ---- -~--l ·.'\ QUENDALl TERMINALS •; I I I I I '· '--~~~L:.: P~\. '\ ·11· ------_--------'r" : ~ :· . . -~.";!. ~:~i:~~r--- ,ll NOHS ~ & 5. P{lllNTIAL- RETAININC 11-'ll RESIOEtlTIAL !°'..:<5'.>] ,~ 1- ,o· I \;s :I l~ • -1 • ! ~/ • < • I t><O = ,;)fl I i t ,n NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET I .f550 I.I.KE w~ EIO\ll£Yi\RD, REMTON, WASMMGTON C301 LAND USE, SHORELINE & MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION CONCEPTUAL STORM DRAINAGE AND GRADING PLAN ' , ~ I 1 l ' 8 I j A 1 Ii":!'.! :Cl. \~, 1,; ''C;'/\V~;:n U.'Nl)l"'.10'-i ·,r· ) SF A""'i l'.'.:,81 F A1 -:-·~:,, C' i,l''F "'· ,\~. l'\i Ve'':'[ ' ~ , I ' ~----" ilX'll'li.~i ·-1- L4N0;:,oc I SIONJ(/ lOO>fWE ·c;i.·F ""Al"F 1:-.?!. ·~·. L/.tJ[ '-~· S..RB (ni'] 'A'WH ··; 8>.' ·O •;f ·· '" --' :t.1,, "': l ,., r•;i·· .l~" !?.;~ • ,r,.\·., .,.hr \!~:[S " --1 m· !'«.'11'l'J(/ ~ij~SCAPO ijq:11D -, ' ===~·· H "·;<)S3 <")[' CT ELEf,:1[\JT:S p..;o ~-::ryni\ • ·~J ?'.Cf"f-' r A \N:! I Vl;Fl\' LFf'PFnY; ex~ THF :SI:". :..f J:'-:Gs ,:-~1 ..... E ?UE '.''1'' IL. :;1 .=.,u.:·, 1·1:· ·;_.r.:c1 i/1_;,i: <\Fe.')t.W-'ED. •·\,'.\~I K O.Ml.l :•if -A(;", f'Af1KltL I ~ ' • ~ H-;:: c;::;:;,ss ~,c:·: fl()[,];· rM:::NTS f,'.,j[) \,',1:T·;,,:,, Ot~ [ P:,. C. r ~ ', :u .. \1,\,'Y [.'f'F'i:''f°'/DING ON THF ! iSf ()F ~<;;, ·)~l rrn :::.H \]'..)[ OF Ti·!C (,7 ",[(:T. .,. ';18£~>1.1\/1.A>(:St•Of '/,I -· -q;: [ ,::,q,\ Tf ':~ ~ STREET_~ TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION s·,u:· ,. = 4' 3'10-. 12' p,Ai(•NJ> .. ~ . lm:: -~:~~*_ ...... _ ... ----L:~s--~ :.a' • • c • <--&'C'Pll IT11') ~ '.::?!. -" "--,=::-"'-"cs··,;,·, STREEL B -TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION sc•lf:: ,· ~ f EB t 11-J'.' r.tlf• ,,,~ :,u :;·w> ' ?I I ·;s•,(i !V,'' I\ P.\llKlf;,; G-~n /._ :~ -~LINCf"IJ r "'C ''"' ~:-:-r;-~;· ' 1(t f ar,rnlGll!=AALJ( " W)flf•l1/iM125CWf 1-~~ jl_ •pr·,, r,:.,;:;:. ,;c;, .. TF .l:_;t W.11'!.L); D'.TENDS SO !li)l,[,'l'~Y (llG( Ill<~ NO ~-S""l;-ET P,,R,:tfG. ,UP~ (feP) ~ ; (' t:s;,;;:T \\'l[,E CLRB (; ,CEET W:JE s1c:VJ,\LI< AND 10 ;-"\:c:f '!-/iCE. L.,'\WFSCi<PINO l'Jf:fl..H 'HF rn.nfN.;6; r= lf-'F GlCJND FL·J')F I !,:; r'/\'"lK:'lG f_i,\[!-'1.0:C · ''<:,>l:f}<l 'r,;_, w1,:.r,1N<\' , ~ a 11' '.D!WIH €' ~- P.\Pl'l!IG ,o·,:,, ........ ;-···'";fo··············--·· ;,,1', If SOEWIIK 1 ; ~.5 ft.ET Wl()f: curw. 12 F:"::[T \/•!If.";;;: 'Sl'JF '/V_.\I" :-,r,i~ ~ n+·T W'fX f,a':D!\C.;\F'ING ~S[;\R 'Tfl[ U\;'!.Dit-ln ,1:-TS1i::R[ k! •;,.:; • ~ ~ f ,-.._.~· Cl!liH {TW) ·~l! ' i.:21 ! I' >; H<"r\Of\; l-_'. !-.1/Lt\iTS !/Kl /JI'.'.; 'Ht, [;: ')!'LL \I/cf~'-' '")Fi''ft~l')I\CG',J :,,f; J'.,c ()i '\.~ i:-:r:·:,.-:1::;-, ~:;n~· C•F ,:..,!""_ ~:7-:::r:E- --------·-Oil Iii moos OIHJII! YOO Ila --~---·---1-600-el·\555 I I rdY)/'0 S I I I l!f".UJ Pm M111G•11()!; f10UKl,IEN'S s : ~ L_ E. H(J )rl: S Wr r:;Hrl ,>PFk PE'i1$'0" JOH Mo . '~W)()~,(I ~S NOH.ll 2! STREET C -TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION lq,ff '.-,f.J(f 1· ~ ~, l'-'1 ""4'='-"'""""' "'"'~.-.A,SJO! """'""' ............. _. I f'A[-<KIN(, ··;,i~'A'.,f' It~ 1'·1' ·'.'.'R()JNf) f'i rc:v,;, ;:;n)r,, ~;,, n-1: i~uu;1wr· \' . .'.:.H nil' l:.!.,; . s::u,;_i £Xtr.Jl~S rn RON:lWAl fl:'G!" 1!l[ll( ~CT <)-i-SThITT f'Al'!'!N0, sn ,u~ (NP) i [ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION QUENDALl TIRWINALS .ffl(l LAKE WAStlNGTOII il0Ut.£YARO,. IIEIITOJ,I, W.ISl:flMGTC* LAND USE, SHORELINE & MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION ROADWAY SECTIONS ~:-if.I I C302 ' " . ! t, ~- l .! I ~ ! l ·' 1,1AK~ ES (~•HFI & ll ;'(f:T rlf\U!I 'f_ IJ\",. • j P-''\"IN.'• i '· \'!ll)f"-(:1,,1'.' '\'iPf' :'1r·;p .\ ~ /!If+ '.'l('·s ,,.. -\I.I• " I: 1Q ,, ,,~;: 10" n· -'"' --,,,\,, -1 I . (." tU~D [HP) I l''RiE • . ·-LI~-r.: · 1 % •• dliL '"'"'·~ "C-ilJ c·r;r-:wt,.·, STREET D -TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE SECTION -YJ\\E 1· ------------ 1C Ffi 1 '"' ----:ioiW1i:N l-'N0SC~PC 1!_ ~l\fnts ;n·-,12" -1 1~-11' 't~~--- w ' I o· c·c:~~ {rw) / ;p. STREH E c TYPICAL PRIV_Al_LDRIVE SECTION •;c,11,:. r. i 0 ~ '\·f.l ',\'lf.ll ~IMl'M 'l"d·['l';T, I\;~ lO\D'oU•i ,_-~--,,_._,;'. •·f;' ALTERNATE SECTION SHOULD ALSO BE PROVIDED FOR THE PORTION OF STREET E WITH PARK!NG Ot-J BOTH S!DES. GLNH~!,I. tWT!": IF ADDmONA!. PAVUJ WID1H IS RFQU!RFD TO PROV!OF TH[ MIN!MUM sr:Pt,Ri\TAION f\P'."iEE.N UTIUTV UNFS TH(:, ":;THEFT WIDTH SHQUl D '.ff it!r:;m .. fiSFD tsc•-Dl'DH·JGl Y NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION lr.R•lil1Br llf"1rMO~'i ~ -----~ wTJ CM1 JW(l Bl~~[$$ ~ ... _: .,'.~·,; QUENOALl TERWtHAlS lHC(Sf.Q ~y ~r. Pl c1rn B1 ~i"°f~ )"" ~ 1q,ff '"'' '"''""'" "'" '"~ ~•."':.;(' ,-' -4350 I.AKE WASHfHGTOII 80Ut.EVARO, l!EKTON, WASHIIG10N I I •.\1J ll~V ~IJ!ll\11\l W\r.\/ "~'"·"""" /;_ 1 1 . -. .. -No/;·;\~~9 l-&IJ-m-'.1555 ~-~-. .~,. ,/ ,,, LAND USE, SHORELINE & MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION -···· ··-'it~~o ~E, unG~'IOt< ~:!l[~[lh . ,, ~ ~ L E ~,_.. ..... ,.~_..""' 1n_1:1•·c 1,rlc.H~Tn.··J P(VIC>!Ot-1 :~ J~E ~, -i,11001;::, A':.N0-'1D •• ,,,,,,,. ROADWAY SECTIONS 1 1 5,,11.r C303 ' ; 1 ! J l I J i ! ' " ' rc,,r,,-~,, R,1>11,r~c 11~1; , %,., .,,, BAP.BoE !Jll~ rn"FRr - 11u,,,-r1+1 PLAZA C>11~1tl ?Jrl£:l ·r I ,UNCJ(S2!~- (__ __ ~ _ _; RESIDEHTIAL ~ii5: ~ " ~ 1~: f"{)Tf~LIJ O'OHrw: 11'1.l) I i~-- 1 ' -I I I _I .. _-, ' . ' Lj \'fl(;flj;·~;-~1~1 ·,-.... __ ATH .. f"II-: C("lt~ 'l.-'<"ta:[)Pt,1: ,J, ,r,;.~Y l ;----____ ----z*'~ -----________ _..,1,\'---r~- _,, -"''"'' ··"'"" . i-'~ , o , j I 1' ' ·,._ .<,;,.-~4-~Pl:B.i,;t_f.!:, E..0-"-~ 'ol 12~· a '.ll !-'ls~ •''",()1 .Dt----,------0---___r:___ -"~'"'-.._-. ..._ .. ..::., ----.h-~~~ .. s~i-:1'-_/?~RTVME;,;_, -;=---___ STRErTA I,! ~\~~:;,a ~-__ ._~ __ --_?_~-~ 1!J-R1V/fri:rn -~~ -"-------~~--_-;;,-~j_ -~R~V_:'7~ : PR';:VA1'F: -~~-- 1 --I ~- PRIV,TE ~--:--,w;.•,,•,,;,,; ---'\ ti:/ _____________ _!c_c,_ss_ _ __ _ __ _ ,,:;;g,';~; _ [ sl~ -------------------L~----- PRI TE -----------------------'._. __ ,s:_---------------------------------------------___ ;_ ~ ------ --~ ; J''--c - >lG. --_ ---...--:::.__-_-------------____________ Rlf:!:.EY~ _ _,.,. --. lA/([ ----------------- ---:_._!j_§HtNcro,, ------...._ !:IQ}[$_;_ f'h'R:,;IJ[NHi '18,l;~nrn f~P ~'IG/,'l()N ,"f 'H!: Pll(}P[~]Y 1¥U l''. CON'-1'.':TUJ l'ftC;.' '0 ['(ltc'Yll(~L M l}r/111(:ffl,(NIAL Pi~m:noo ~GF•!U {U'A) IS ~>f[ Lf.\D .i.:BfcY fOR All Si!r: 'iC~t~A~OO /.11{1 t,flTIC.\fON ACIOt1$ 1'11'~ A!;£ TO BE P£Rfl)'ll,o(!) ~1 THE ()lWDALt. Jt:~•LS ~It: ;JNOCR JJ"(RFIJN(I 7 ~J\llm~.\ llUllDII'; 111¥1 l)f/1;1~ ('~N'Cll:JH'i A.'<ll M'!NE ~Ar ll1 p·,mlfr J fl'):lf)l[ \.Tl!Pf 1:r)N:l'Cl!ON'i ';tllJI lll IN1' ;i!TWJ~ ~1~11c11.1111:i1 f< .. 11111,;G.\ ,,No 1~>11-ll(.M!P ,rn AilEA> 10 W<JMllf 'Ii[ R',Y. Of :O•~•·-;t ID ~1 :.i~c.s D'Jr fO !JlFEfl!.N1•. Sl:11.I~Clll. ---,, 9,,, ---------~ ·,u --... .,,,/ ,,,.,., /c ' • • • I ~o> • •O ·, ALL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDED AS MITIGATION MEASURES IN THE QUENDALL TERMINALS MIT!GAT!ON DOCUMENT ARE APPLICABLE AND SHOULD BE PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION i~ ,~,.-" t J l ~·~;r "";;; '" :····· ... ~ ........ =. rorwn_ Bt ~ WTJ V,1',V --·IJAT_E __ , CHD. IA<>PR flt'lf'Srn PE'i 111:t{;PIDN P.LOt.tl!OIQl'S RE\1$,DN NOV '6, 20M __ JOH No :'!:.!)()(::;(• Clll Jll)llllll~ ™Hf-Oii !00 rt l-1'.1414-1555 i;-:; /11. f· A'-. NC,'TF.[) lq,ff -·--- OUENDAU T£RMINAlS '3SO W£ WASHINGTON 90Ull'!'Al!D, RENT<:tl, '#~ LAND USE, SHORELINE & MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION CONCEPTUAL STORM DRAINAGE ANO GRADING PLAN ~;('('! C300 ! I I ' l ' ---------"~ A - ·('.,~ ---·---------........ '· )''I . --..... .,,,,._. /IA / --~ ~Jl,.~ ,.. . · c· ----.,-.,,,__ \ . ' .. ',t r ' ', \ \ I ~v \\~\\_\\[ s \ \ \-~'.\ . +- ·o ' H [jj Fl.OW-: ... .../ \Ill BYPASS ·-~= ~_ v) ~ '\\\ ...•... \\_J:1 c__J \\\,, ""="'"i~ --- " 12/'JOts DA"T[ NOTES: CN~RDNM9HIJ. R':MrnlAllOH ANO l,IIT[;AllOH IJ' M'. f'ROP£RTY lfllll BE CDNWCTED ?<l'()P. TO OC~IYU(NI. lHf (NIIRDNM[NTAL PWT!:CTION Ar.f~tY ifP•) IS 11* LEIJ) ,\(;f)f(:Y F(JI All 91£ ~EUUllATION IITI 141TIGATIOl1 ACTIC"IS J!ilQj AA!: TO BE POlHWEll Al TH MNDAll ~~IN/J.SSITEC,l)[R',.FU!'llND 1 TH[ PffillU ~TE tlC\.UDES APPl!QXl~A1UY 1.51!3 rrrr 01' ~IOO[Ll!E IJ..C,,G LAKE 111:/'INGlOH A 100-fOOI IIIDTil RIPAAIAH :J:TllACII (~EASURE:D 1RPM M ffiDINAAY HICH WATrR \!ARK) AND PI.RAI.L[LS /J DNG 11£ SIIOREI..IHE. A SttOREI.JHE RESTQRA Tl(lN PI.J.N IS IJ[IIG DESGN£0 AND AP?RO\UI lt!DER £PA Dllll:CTION l:CS ING l\f.llMl)S AND ~C[PTIJAL 'IIEllAND (Jl(AllON/mcSlCJIAIIIJN AREAS SHOli'< HAVE NOT RECUVED nN1,1_ £PA CM:51GN APPF!OI.I.L !.[ll)ITI[)Nl,I_ OIIUllNG Rlx:f DRAIN CONIIECTICIIS ANO PIPiNC ~H 0C RfQIJIRf"O 5 fl.D'llllI UTIVfl' CWN[GTl[)NS SIi.OU 8[ lffO BE1'11ITN smxruRCD ijUl'JllNVi 1,Nl IINSllllJClURED sm AAC•S TO UIIIIJl.'E nff R!9( or DAMAGE lO UTUTES DUE TO C'ITTR~TIAL SETIL'l,!ENl e, mo PPR R[\,ISU) Pl:R IIITIG~TIIJN !l!:WIREMElll5 REI/ISi ON LAKE WASHINGTON -~:~:lt>i WATEUIRI( (OOV!I.I] ~ -SllNOTE\;2 -\ (m rnimt:·s111j[LI~, ' /' so· [ffl\,I SETBAC~ ' ' \ '"' \ . :,,__-~· ',,;-'~-\ _ .. x, ,,--OOTFALl ~'N / rstRGt DISSIPATION ~-._ l(// ";'·/--- ·--:-··-'I:_/ ",, I . ,,..,.,,...;_-J,. I I LEGEND: _J OCSl(HII BY Wl,I ,O,PPROIUJ OYI "'" DAi'f NCV 16 2g_~ J ll R No :1500050 cX15TING 'il(lln() '.SEE NOTE l) ·<-"-/IF . :IJNctPJJJl.l 1'!:TLAAD CRE•TI•)',jR!:S1Cl<ATIO'I iSE£ NO!'E 3) 00 Iii HUSK§ om HUii YOU DI: Hll·IIH555 S C A L E AS NOTED lq,ff --•,.rr.c0m '/' \ A"/' ~,, • • ·~ I Ji, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION QUENDALl TERMINALS .(351) LOO: WAStlMG'ITJff eotJL!VARD, l!OOOII, W.ISHll+GTON LAND USE, SHORELINE & MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION CONCEPTUAL STORM DRAINAGE AND GRADING PLAN SHSET C301 ' ~ ,. l ! y .r, ' 1 § ' l i l :: 8 w, 1~, '·'-fhl"JG .:..,\f\/.Gf 'le~ I Wi'!" '/,~JPS;Aq:. !'.S \•YA '. :.' 1~; f-~s)'i"' c~ ,r:.rM, .,,-, ~ I . t ___ _ (l' , I 12· 'cJ'-"f.l/lJ.(/ ·1- l•~DSC•P£ I 1 ,f" ~;·,::;::-;,; S!""C' ~~r-...; F.! l L1[ ~< f'.} /\~~D W'.t.}1 H~; ., f'<I. f i' ;. ',\'L..L \:,<\P'; C~~~-:.~Nl'.Ti(.1 (.1H -;-__ ,-\ ,r- '· I ,,:,.<r;_c.;, ·~1 T·-1'. ',l'.)t ([ 11-![; ":.TFiEET.(. !::: T' ,::: (),'!-Jr! 01_ ·i:q I_N'1' :-; r-\'.-,.}1..!!"-'HJ iiOt 1r~1,) l.lJIDXAf'E- ·Ht+rFfJ..l"f' -, '"' I,:}!_ ; .. ,6' ct:RS :'W) 'A!<~1:1, ', • -· . " ) ---;;,:",II!' , ~''"'Lr ,.- c<iif .JE [?.:_ '·:f.'.~X~'iT 't!'/.>i'H STREET A -TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION -----rm·,·=" ;p:,·,. ~r..r A 1- " -,.---1 i.iof:iiii'.i<-'i ·-i l>IIOSC-ll'!: ijVtlJ(X ~,[\ W-'..'f.. IJ,\l.':><J•l'TtJ'.' <.lf_"•{,,\';'I,: Y. /.tJJ • S·• H-\S t,. !'i\l'!Kit-il" --.----!~:;~ ------------------~i •-•---'---~· "t"'""'""""""""""""::f"':"" ................... : ...... ·;·;::'"~i~~~ ·--~ I siri~,i.i(iM'clSt.;."I: " 9l"O'•l~/\.N1~0CM'i' ~ , " '"' A"'PR. \'<!~•' TG~r-(,,;,q;, ! I ; ·-·· C'!Ra ( TW) 0:: I "' v,11-,1rVi"'" ""'A"T " ~ ! • I ,_,, 1 I '-2% H! _v: 2X_ . -... --_-LI -~---·LI . ---.,.~ •,@dfud h,," -~---A ,r ,-"~'~vn;Tw,1·111, THf: ·-=:ROSS s::c~!OH f.l.E 1-~UJTS ,tt.;c w:eTlk) O~J ··:1 Hf:~. 1 8 'Ni'...i. VAH'-: '.;fYf-:J,;v~;,:; :::~J -,-1-+ ,.!SE c:: l3:!'L\~i',!('.S ON \S ,.;:J; :SUL::_;: ",,!.:_ SfFET.T. STREET B -TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION ~ • :;/ • i f 11' S1DE:'#AIK '·1! t-G"(]Jlfl(fll') I 1:11 ;c~U': :· ~ f , ~ -" r. u,;;s=-~.1,=.:< v,-,,,1,, lHE cnC':'=S SEC'T''.''.'J 0L \'.[:!;T;:; ;\\[: w:r.THS ON ;;-1 F{-;f: i:: ,;v:L• \1:,:1,· l"i' "'-"1D·~i:-; ur,; fHt': U'.:,I.:.. Of' 8' .. ':L.::-w-:c:::: CA·-< f,'7,-,::,., ~~ '.'[ ::,:_· T;-!; _C:_ffC·>:T rA'AII'! a1 --OFiGM:ll ar TAD WTJ MtrfP HY IJ'PRO'lfi) P,\ ----------+~\\'TCO~)ATS YA\/ P.E"lSi:O. PE!, 1,ji_~(;,0-~~-~~QU:~w-~!J -----~Q_V If'. 2009 ;,n1s-0N JOH ~, ,,!,tt:'.)i,c, Cl!l llO IISllll ™Mfllll !00 It 1-1»-lHII S C A L E A', NC,ff(l STREET C kpff TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION ;o.u:-1~ '"'''""'""""''·''""' --e.US'JOO '°'·"'·'""--·"""""" e· h' -• PAA1<1t10 .1.:..~ E9 ~-SICOI.Lt. D.1DIOS TO RO\OW~l ill({ /fl8E~OW-511!CH F.>P>;1'JC. ~Pl,\N\"r?) 0.5 FE.El 'i'-.iiDE ,::LJRB. 6 FCET W!JE S:['E'NALk Fi f-Tf.'T \",'T:[ ! Jl._M;)'.)CM'lf\JC NrAn THF. e,r.,c,UND f"..COP HP.S F'Ar~ld'lG 3A8AG[ T--j[_C ~ HU!!.l)'H(:;! 11" :V-1111,X l:~ 5'XW•LX mwns 10 R01.C>~'A) ID".,1; Ml[Rf ~O OII-S".f;EfT f"A.'is'~G, ,l[ 'V..~ (NP) 0:5 FEET W:Di=: CU8B 12 FEET WIDE SDF:WALK Af\J[! 4 /:'f-'Ff J;or .. AJ'v[i.,;c.AP!~JG \1[,4[1 THE 8U,LD 0 N(; nr n~[R[ IS NC ~-,,.:u<,~/..,; ,:,.A.Rt'-C': 1M -:-Hr (W.10UNU i t.nm1 "l:<,.n r;-n Ii/ET Ail. PQrl1 !:)f..; OF TH[ 8·)•l'.:}ING' ii NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION QU[NDAU. TERMINALS ss.i:i:r 4350 lAK£ WASlllfGTON BOUL£V.IJID, REKTON, WASHIMGTOtl LAND USE, SHORELINE & MASTER PLAN PER~IT APPLICATION ROADWAY SECTIONS C302 ' ·~ ~ .1 ii ' ! i>f. ::,,Ne:, '-r . .;r.(/ " ~ ,t; i • " l ~AT(:ff [X , rrr1 ,,-,,1-:r: ~·;85 .10' ~· r:,;;~ (1W) n5c;;_s TI'., r. l:A:,'.:tl::.,1,1· \\'':·a11 "' 10 I)' .>NC " --,,,\., -1 " ,,,,,,,n STREET D -TYPIC~L,PRIVATE DRIVE SECTION( D '' VA!:lt$ ~l ;;'-•' 2 .. ·1 1/) 11' l~~( --- w If cl1'1[ 11' 'Sfl •Nl(Tf.'\ f/'Nlf,11_",\ I :,C. ··1>1•n:n, 1;,:~ 0 y111ES ~O_}j l 'I""" , I "-ct:::~ .:" ~ -rr1''" , ,~· 'Jlidl',.~/ c,,N[•SCIF: i-," C,~'fl8 (l"IP) ,.,,-;1t.1<:-;' STREET E TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE SECTION ">CJ.Uc I" • "'A' f'\'S' 'I' L-'DOUOC \Wn)I f/ ;>~ oA<:>'. FC:'·.,: ALTERNATE SECTION SHOULD ALSO BE PROVIDED FOR THE PORTION OF STREET E WITH PARKING ON ROTM SIDES. O!~MD~) ---QUENDAU TERMINALS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ~,'fl T ----~----. \'!T,J 00 !WO [IMl(S5 ---'"'\'.\\ "',,,:"S;::~ ™i:~1-~IIC i,...,.u-;:;~_:,'""" :i'f'?"~''J,}1" LAND USE, SHORELINE &: MASTER PLAN PERMIT APPLICATION l--+---ec-,•,--o-•-,-,..~~·fO!, iiiOO,~om Nov lf-, ~o~·J <; c ~ L c:. ~,t,'.L .L ~4-f':;Y ROADWAY SECTIONS USO LAKE Wl<SHING'!Cltl BOIJL['IARD, RENTON, WASHIMCTOH C303 l-1-.r, -,A"1 GY (HO A~f'R -'"'"'""'""" !<E\ll;IQN ! 0 P, ~> ,ll)l)(U:;() A':. NOT!:'.J ...... DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: M E M O R A N D U M March 28, 2016 Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager Brianne Bannwarth, Development Engineering Manager Traffic Concurrency Test -Quendall Terminals; File No. LUA09-151 The applicant is requesting Master Plan Review, Binding Site Plan, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and SEPA Environmental Review for a mixed-use development located at 4350 Lake Washington Blvd. The site is 21.46 acres and is zoned Commercial/Office/Residential {COR) and located within the Urban Shoreline designation. The 21.46-acre site would be divided into 7 lots of which 4 would contain 6 -7 story mixed-use buildings. Overall, the development would consist of 692 residential units (resulting in a net residential density of 40.95 units/acre), 20,025 square feet of retail and 9,000 square feet of restaurant. The applicant has proposed to dedicate 3.65 acres for public right-of-way, which would provide access to the 7 proposed lots. Surface and structured parking would be provided for 2,171 vehicles. The site contains approximately 0.81 acres of wetlands and 1,583 linear feet of shoreline along Lake Washington. The proposed development would generate approximately 5,656 net new average weekday daily trips. During the weekday AM peak hour, the project would generate approximately 435 net new trips (104 inbound and 331 outbound). During the weekday PM peak hour, the project would generate approximately 530 net new trips (340 inbound and 190 outbound). The proposed project passes the City of Renton Traffic Concurrency Test per RMC 4-6-070.D as follows: EXHIBIT 17 Transportation Concurrency Test -Quendall Terminals Page 2 of 3 March 30, 2016 Traffic Concurrency Test Criteria Implementation of citywide Transportation Plan Within allowed growth levels Project subject to transportation mitigation or impact fees Site specific street improvements to be completed by project Traffic Concurrency Test Passes Evaluation of Test Criteria Pass Yes Yes Yes Yes Implementation of citywide Transportation Plan: As shown on the attached citywide traffic concurrency summary, the city's investment in completion of the forecast traffic improvements are at 130% of the scheduled expenditure through 2016. Within allowed growth levels: As shown on the attached citywide traffic concurrency summary, the calculated citywide trip capacity for concurrency with the city adopted model for 2014 is 85,884 trips, which provides sufficient capacity to accommodate the 5,656 additional trips from this project. A resulting 80,228 trips are remaining. Project subject to transportation mitigation or impact fees: The project will be subject to transportation impact fees at time of building permit for each new building. Site specific street improvements to be completed by project: The project will be required to complete all internal and frontage street improvements for the building prior to occupancy. Any additional off-site improvements identified through SEPA or land use approval will also be completed prior to final occupancy. Background Information on Traffic Concurrency Test for Renton The City of Renton Traffic Concurrency requirements for proposed development projects are covered under Renton Municipal Code (RMC) 4-6-070. The specific concurrency test requirement is covered in RMC 4-6-070.D, which is listed for reference: D. CONCURRENCY REVIEW PROCESS: 1. Test Required: A concurrency test shall be canducted by the Department for each nonexempt development activity. The concurrency test shall determine consistency with the adopted Citywide Level of Service Index and Concurrency Management System established in the Transportation Element of the Renton Comprehensive Plan, accarding to rules and procedures established by the Department. The Department shall issue an initial concurrency test result describing the outcome of the concurrency test. Transportation Concurrency Test -Quendall Terminals Page 3 of 3 March 30, 2016 2. Written Finding Required: Prior to approval of any nonexempt development activity permit application, a written finding of concurrency shall be made by the City as part of the development permit approval. The finding of concurrency shall be made by the decision maker with the authority to approve the accompanying development permits required for a development activity. A written finding of concurrency shall apply only to the specific land uses, densities, intensities, and development project described in the application and development permit. 3. Failure of Test: If no reconsideration is requested, or if upon reconsideration a project fails the concurrency test, the project application shall be denied by the decision maker with the authority to approve the accompanying development activity permit application. The Concurrency Management System established in the Transportation Element on page Xl-65 of the Comprehensive Plan states the following: Based upon the test of the citywide Transportation Plan, consideration af growth levels included in the LOS-tested Transportation Plan, payment of a Transportation Mitigation Fee, and an application of site specific mitigation, development will have met City of Renton concurrency requirements. Barbee Mill A,cce:::: NEl'J ~ \_J LViJ ___, -.of .• L .• \,\i:;·:-h,;19'.,"," Lr:;\) t;,:, ·i·1:Xi?'" ;,;tw r:Ui)~':::·1;,(_:c:n ',':·t'· QUENDALL TERMINALS <(-NEW Lake Washington Blvd NEW -"-II> Riplev Lr aka Se 2 r a,·vk::s \\/ a.y NEW .J "I',_,_·. _ ~JEW N ! ADDITIONAL MOTOR VEHICULAR LANES REQUIRED TO MITIGATE PROJECT IMPACTS (Included in DEIS, EIS Addendum, FEIS, or Mitigation Document) EXHIBIT 18