Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 01' I 6d] "ml 0) ~ z 0 ,= < " ~ 0 ~ ,. > ~ < t;; " ~ 0 ~ ~ M :,,, ,11, .:f:;." ""~i 11;. 11i, '1!1 I oe -j'! :Ui!i "C !!'. Q) > Q) 0 I • -a ca ~ I r ""'" :::i ro :e ~ • ~" ,, ' ~ n ' 'l z ~ < ~ :;:: /. iQ ~ ;- ·~ :J cL ~ "' z 0 v C ? " ~-· @ ' ~/:!. ~ <il ~ai~ iii ' ,~: ~ -0~ ii;(; ,5 'v- L 0 fC ~ ;:, '--' i:'.l Cl w j w w z Q ll~Jll5 ~N, 'ND1N3~ lS )A~ •lllllt 50\IAI 6LS'Oll/f L9V. I\ 3>1Vl 113HlNV d 8 ' ; ' ' ; ' ' ~t 'lo'~ ,. ;§ .. ··:-·.-·,'"·_"'"IJ,I_:·: " / __ t~·;: ! . ~ ~ ~~?llo-.... <>-SE a!S.J.111.<.!l:U' ,. • . ii" ··-···--""' . a,S'~"l"<JU;l• ~ ~ , ' ' ~i ! 8 ~i ' ' ! '-- I iii!{ 111h - 1- ~, I 'i--~ l - il_il ~· ,;_-_-:..- ' ! ! I • I " ij~J~6 ~H, "NCLN3~ 3S 3.'11 >U911 60~81 6L£()lf/E9V \\ 3>1Vl tl3HlNV J -I u (;j Ffli_JJ ~::, ::--=; IJdL,7 <0 f1AjJ /of' . --: I I . ! I . I I ' ' I • I I '-------------------------------------'' l ~ ~ "~~~ ' 1 ' ti! -0 ' <>1S ' !; -· <ll ! , e 0 ()}) g iii,:; 5~ 0 ri~ • • \., ' ll~J\16 VM ·~0-NJc/ 3S 3M Hl\111 5011111 6LSOl}/EL9V \\ 3>1V1 tl3HlNVJ lu ~~ 1 li !~ ~~ ! • ~!!: ! -., ! i ;a e, 10 iV _, il ' .. ~ ~ i C: ~ Si ~ ' ! - - IN ' I ~LJ - ' ' I ! ' I i ! I ! I ' ! I I • I ':81-r---=:::::::::~--;::::::::::::i==--,--,-------;------;==-~--I 1--1~-~/> ! .,,. :·~ ' l ! i ' I ! ! ! ! I ' i i ' • l I I > I I 0 I '· ' ' ) .. ' 1: "~ ~ '8 11 • 8j . I~ I! j ~ ',':' I'~ j a !i ilj ( • \ . r~~~_J •. 'h I ! II:{ :! !_I 1, '[P 1,:1 I , , . . JJ,-.oot $. t'==~===;:::.1'."16~TS~A~VE~S~E=~= ,~·-2· _,. ~t~ r,----+-----L----1 : --1 I I H- -i- I 1 11 __ _ 120TH AVE SE ~ f------- PANTHER. LAKE W;\673/310579 18809 I 16TH AV[ SE RENTON, WA 9!50~8 I ~ I --~ I I I I I I L -L -'---~ --I i ~ sl • • • p I r I I I[ l 20TH AVE SE - (© Hll ',-+ 100 • ,-+ f ; ilff-;<))--,---------------:,::1,!---,--------,--\--- I ' if ,) . I " I • l ! > I -I ! ! . : j ::.:: ':. 116THAV£St " il ,, !I r,~1, ~I PANTHER LAKE WA673/3\0S79 18809 116TH AVE SE RENTO~. WA 98058 !! ',,1 •, -----. ._ ___ _ -..........__ __ G '· ------n ~'('-, \: ; ~ (© sl ~~ ' fl<> ~ • .-+ • I ~ F~1 r~ 1 · i I ' I ! i ' ! I ! ! ! I ' ! ! " ~ ~ 8 ,,, r ;, > z "f 1: il > I N < ' ' ' ! ' i / < / ' / / / / ii '8 B! i! ,; !i l''-L" ) ) I I :ga1:1 " I ,•l !l I 'I· ' 3 ':!; ,, 111 ,i 111 sj I' I I I " ,i l ~D~ . L" ~ o ; • •-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•_J ... I PANTHER LAKE !I" ~ ii j:U WA673/310579 ! ! ~ 19809 116T~ AYr. SE ~ RENTON. WA 980~8 • 11 I ,: ,.; . ' ,.'.]./\~! I :;:_-, = -::::-::, <;, {, 0 ~::. I"" 0 0 ,,, \) ~<:, ,1 'v "' Q (, 0 -:;J~· ,; ,' <..'-:> (l •• ~;~.! r;"" ,c:,. 0 C (' i ~ (© •i t~ ' II<> • ·-• I ~ ! " iiITT.1------------------::-,::-~ i I • I I i ' I i I l ! i ' I i . ! I ii le ,s :g.Si 11 I ~ > I w ( ' 11 B~ JI :I I I 1: " ' 'I ! !1 ' ,, ' Ii ... _ ... ..·-·-·-·-·::::ii .. _,,. 11 -• ,·-·· ,._,. ii ii s i! i! ,, ;: !I 3~ 1, 1,\ '! 'I 1' 11 h I ~ ,, i \jl ~J I I I / I . " DI CJ •l S·!o ¥1_,~.· /!i (QI~ 0 •""1=_ -i:;p or:::::J • g.· ~ •-,·_ •-.~•-•-•-•-,-,-•-,_ •-•-•-,_ ,_ ·-·-•-,_ •-.J :, 0 :; ... . ' e ~ ii ii • . ,~ 11 -r ~ ! ~ ill PANTHER LAKE ~ 5 ; WA673/310579 ~ 16&l>l 1H)TH AVE SE s RENTON, WA 960~5 :;: j ii ' . ! ! t l!'9 ; ii~ ~ ~ !ID-~ ~ •!! ! 11 'I 'I :1 ' : a;~ ' ' ! !o!!; I, !! I. ' ' 2j,~ '-j! Ii ! !!i I 13 §i~ l i:i 25 -· ' I :I !1 1! •' ! ' 11 '1 'I 11 ! 11 h I ' \ \ _J 11 i ";A/(~ ! Jg) D ~ ~ np: ~ ~ :, ~ F ~ > 5 7 i 1: ' > l 'I I I I, ..j:a. ! !1 ! :1 I .. ' II " PANTHER LAKE ~I ! I ~ (© . ~ ii~ Qi WA673/310579 i~ si / ill I 11~ ~~ ...... I " I po IB809 116TH AYf. SE ::~ • 0 ..... "j RENTON, WA 98058 :;: a [ l ~ i +-,I~ oil' 8g -· Ctl i s" " o))) ~ !l ~ ' 11';0116 ~M 'N01N1H 35 31\~ HL9Ll 6JS!ol 6LSlllf/f.:'..4V.\\ 3>1V11!3l-LlNV <l !, 11 n ,1;1 ih .. =~ 'i !, ,! !i :1 Lr) I < I ~ I NI I" ;:I $ : ; i ' . d ' I i ' i ~1 ! ~~ ! d ii I ' I c-'' I . L.--J I ' !11i ' i ,r i ~ ! 8 11i ' i I I ! ' I !i: !i: ei I ii ei I i !i: e: ii ,,' 11" \ ·!"; ~~~ ~~~8~~~ it::;, i::::;, i::t:: • • • 11--" p--011--" ?~ ?ij ?ij i l[I! I I[!(! i;!! BE §E gs r++++-+-+++-+-1---J.-+-+-~ ii"" i "" '"" ' r+-'-+-'-+-+-'--+-'-i-J.-LI-C-, ~;~ .... ;~ .... ~ .... l I I i I I ' I i ! ' ii . . ii . • I . . I I l ·' I l ~ i ·, I ' ' • I I • I • ' I !i: !i: ;!i i I !i: !i: ei i I !i: !i: ej !i: 11B 1 )1!B I \1 i! I ! itt$ !ins iitts 1 • • i-0 0 ·11--0 ·11--0 0 J ij ~ ij ~ ij 1!/li·!l:1;,11;1;, E" ;s ;s .' r++++++-+++++-1-+++-~ ll~n\15 1!/t '~OlNJtl JS J/1~ H.1911 60BBL 6Li;l)IU~.L9V \\ 3>1Vl 1EIH_LNYJ I !j II I, I! f: C ,,, . C) .. !: > ,-},~ (3 +-;--'l ,, ··w! ;:;·,,\ C .f;.--,,/ (t, l3 '' ~ i I ' j ~ -· Oil' l _, ro I ®) ,ti ,.,(¥ Ui ;[j ' ,, :1 I :11. ! ;, ~h1'~ i)a!,.ll .. *!i hm I~ il j ~~ \ ,-, E ,sosG VM ·~o-N3~ 3S ~V Hl911 50991 6LS0IUEL9VA'\ 3>1Vl tl]HlNV J .. ,. .. ==1 i I I I : I i I ! I .,. '.(, ;· l ~\.. ~· ! ~~ " 'I !!~ ' ' ~~ ' ~. ! ;g !, -· " I "' ~·· l tu '1w i !I '" ~.; N .;~ I! ! I ! ! I ,, LL. '' ,s Ii 8' • er::: ~H e~ ~~ 9 ~ • \~ C: CJ f ;;;; -- "' i!lg; :~ ""' ~g i!l~i 'i:! '"'~ e0 L m !" lo ,_:i,, ~ lo :t .;;;,s ~:z (..) .... ii : C ; I N r ~I - I :i il i i;: .. •.m. ~ jh''' llilll ? ~ i • I . I l ' ! ' I I .__ ____________ i==--__________ _J! ' ~1 co~ o))) ' -i-x-x-x-x-~_/ ' / / /' / ' / Bi096 W/1 'NO.LNJcl CS ]1W h.llll, SC9BI 6L<;OIV£L9V.\\ 3>1Y1 i:13HlNVJ :, ~n ,, 'II ~~ ~~ i ! I j! , a' ,! ,,, H-!§ ,! ,;i CU I w..J i ® •• ! I ' ! l " ' 12 !, ,! 1·1 11 ~~ ~ r ~~;r I ;~~i s .. !I! ~· 11!1 ·I ··! ' !!L f ~ ~1 !, r ~ 11 ~~ £~ I! @: •• " I !~ !! \1~0\16 Wf, "NOH-IJ!l JS ·3:w H19ll f>0\18, 6LSO!f/EL9V.\\ 3>1V1 tl3HlNV cl . 0 ~ 00 - 00 00 "!!' 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 ' ! 0 0 • i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 oo _Q_I 00 00 -6: 0 0 -I ., tu ~ - ! !I @~ ,, "" !N !~ g~ I'• ~i i j ~8 "' I "' 'd i u.J ~f' !! "! il ' .. ~ ~ I ~ ____ __j_ _____ L_ ____ _l_ ____ _J! Without WA673 Panther Lake Coverage Map Min I Max Legend ~ .-.94 .. . . In door -·-103 J~~C~r ... -11 3 · On-street ,,,,--· With WA673 Panther Lake Coverage Map Min -.-94 . iiiiiiiil <1 0 3 . '-1 1 3 Max ~n door :In -C ar On-street APR 2 8 tO/! Legend CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: December 13, 2011 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: LUA (file) Number: Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Acceptance Date: Applicant: Owner: ; Contact: PID Number: , ERC Decision Date: : ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Approval: Appeal Period Ends: ' Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Mylar Recording Number: .-c~O AT&T Mobility Panther Lake LUA-11-024, ECF, CU-A Vanessa Dolbee May 12, 2011 AT&T Mobility Michael James Kopick Sunny Ausink 3223059075 June 6, 2011 June 24, 2011 June 7, 2011 June 24, 2011 Date: Date: Project Description: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) and a Conditional Use Permit to amend an existing wireless telecommunications facility with a new antenna that would provide 4G technology to the surrounding area, Location: 18809 116'" Avenue SE Comments: ~-------·~'-''··· City I nton Department of Community & Economr 1efopment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: MAY 26, 2011 APPLICATION NO: LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 12, 2011 APPLICANT: AT&T Mobility PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: AT&T Mobility Panther Lake PROJECT REVIEWER: SITE AREA: 1.33 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 1,540 square feet LOCATION: 18809 116'" Avenue SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) and a Conditional Use Permit to amend an existing wireless telecommunications facility with a new antenna that would provide 4G technology to the surrounding area. The existing monopole is located at 18809 116th Avenue SE in a Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre zone. The proposal would add three new antennas, remote radio heads, and "SQUID" suppression on to the existing unstaffed wireless facility. The antenna would be 55.2" x 11.8" x 6.0" is size and would be located within an existing AT & T facility site which is approximately 270 square feet. The overall parcel area is 1.33 acres in area. The existing AT & T wireless facility is accessed via an access easement off of SE 188th Street, located just north of the subject site. The addition to the existing monopole would not impact any existing trees located at the subject site. No new landscaping or fencing is proposed. There are not critical areas located at the subject site. Currently the site has three cell tower spaces leased and one existing residence. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code} COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Liaht/Glare Plants Recreation land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Tronsrx rtotion Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 8. POLICY-RE LA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signatur,e "Cit Di ector or Authorized Representative ' I \,,.) r r / I/ Date J i ' ( / ___.. nton Department of Community & Econom, ve/opment City, ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: MAY 26, 2011 APPLICATION NO: LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 12, 2011 APPLICANT: AT&T Mobility • ROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: AT&T Mobility Panther Lake PROJECT REVIEWER: SITE AREA: 1.33 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 1,540 square feet LOCATION: 18809 116'" Avenue SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) and a Conditional Use Permit to amend an existing wireless telecommunications facility with a new antenna that would provide 4G technology to the surrounding area. The existing monopole is located at 18809 116th Avenue SE in a Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre zone. The proposal would add three new antennas, remote radio heads, and "SQUID" suppression on to the existing unstaffed wireless facility. The antenna would be 55.2" x 11.8" x 6.0" is size and would be located within an existing AT & T facility site which is approximately 270 square feet. The overall parcel area is 1.33 acres in area. The existing AT & T wireless facility is accessed via an access easement off of SE 188th Street, located just north of the subject site. The addition to the existing monopole would not impact any existing trees located at the subject site. No new landscaping or fencing is proposed. There are not critical areas located at the subject site. Currently the site has three cell tower spaces leased and one existing residence. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minar Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Liqht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnnrt.ation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000Feet 14,000Feet B. POL/CY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where add;t;onal information is needed to properly assess this proposal. c_,QC)J\_J~:) Signature of Director or Authorized Represtntative Date STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on June 10, 2011. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $91.00. /~, ,4//{,?C..4 Lifida M. Mills Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter Subscrib11d and swovn to me this 10th day of June, 2011. Lt ,{!,., or the State of Washington, Residing ,;,; ... ( ·-.,,..· l'iOTICEOF ENVIRONMEl'iTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONME!\TAI. REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASl[[!'iGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Dctcm1i- nation of Non-Significance for the following proJect under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. AT&T Mobility Panther Lake LUA! l-024. ECF, Cu-A Location: 18809 I 16th Ave. SE The applicant has proposed to amend an existing wireless facility with 3 new antennas, remote radio heads, and '"SQU [D" suppression that would provide 40 technology to the surrounding area. The existing monopole is locatedat 18809 116th Ave. SE in the R-8 zone Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in v..Titing on or before 5:00 p.m. on June 24, 2011. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, I 055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 110.B Addlt10nal information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office. (425) 430-6510. Published in the Renton Reporter on June t. 2011 #498370. r) CityoL ~ -----1fr'\'sLtJ.i{G[.Ll ~ NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PE11SON5 Of Al'l fr.VIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJ£CTNAME: AT&T Mcbnlty P•nthor L>ko LUA11·D2•, ECF, CU-A 11109 3l UB"' A .. nuo SE PROJ£CTNUMBE~: LOCATION: DE5CRIPT10N: Tho appHanl I• r.~uo,llnr Envlronrnontol R•Yl-(SlPA) and • Candlllanal Uso Po,..,~ tc amond an e,clot1n1 ,olr•l•,. l•lacammunlatlons faclllt,, ~th• MW ontonn• that wnuld provld• 4G to<hnolor, to 1M Wt'faundlng aroa, Tho Hl.,ln1 monapol1 l1 lo<>Otod at 18111!1 lllthAvo""" SE In a R"'ldanjf.al 8 (R·8) dw,ollln( unit, p<ir n'1 W~ l<IM, Too pmpo .. l would add th..., now anlonnH, Nlmate radio head•, and "SQUID" suppro,.lon onto th< ••l<t!>,I unst>ffed wlrol<!n faclttt.,.. Tho ,ntonna would IHI S5.l" • 11.8" • &,O" Is 1lt1 a,,d "°"kl b1 fout<td wlthl<, an t•l<ll'1JATC.Tlaclllty ,!t<twhlch 1, appn,,/mal:lllyUQ """'" leot. Tho o~erall pm:1! aru 1, l.33 a<tn, TIN! esl0lln1 AT&T .,.lro!,eff l,,dm:y 1, acce .. •11 ~I• an_,, .. H,emont ofl of SE 188th 511'11•~ locaHd I"'< north of the ,ubject ,1t1. Thi acldlllon tu the e,cls,;n1 rnonopolo would not lmpattany exl511n1 !NIH h,catod at tho oub]otlllte. Non.,... lond,uplns or lenclnJ I• proposed. Thoro '"' Ml <rlt1col >r.a, IQCatod .ttho ,ub]otldlo. Curnntly tho ,Ito hH th,... cell n,,.., •1>-l••<od ...,d o,,o ••l<tln1 ""Id•= THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAl REVIEW COMMITIEE IERQ KAS DETrnMINED THAT Tl-IE PROPCSED ACTION DOES NOT HA\IE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON TH£ EN\IIRONMENT. Appul! of tht 1nvlronmen\al determination mu<! bo fllod In wrltln11 on or bi!fore 5:00 p.m. an Juno 24, 2011. Ap?eal, mu,! be flied In writing to1eihu with the requlr,id fee with: He.arln11 Examiner, City ol Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 980S7. App.,.11 to the E~•mlner ore governed by aty of Renton Munidpal Cad• Soc!Jan 4-3-110.B. Addltlanal information regardln1 the appeal pracen may be obtaln,d !ram the Renton City cru1r•, Office, 1425) 43tl-65lD. IF THE HI\IIRONMUHAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING Will BE SET AND All PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPl:R AUTHORIZATION Plea$e Include !he project NUMBER when calling fur proper file ldent!flcatlon. CERTIFICATION I, (Jo.nesso. ... Do l be..e.. , hereby certify that 5 copies of the above document were posted in .,3__ conspicuous places or nearby the described property on Date:&/ 10 ,l / Signed~/7/l})(L --U-dr/.ce STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING My appointment expires:_ --'-;-'-\"""~"'J"'~~,'-1-'--"''::2:...'1:...,-;;"°·. -"c'-': i,,,..3..,_ ____ _ CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 8th day of June, 2011, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination & Administrative Conditional Use Permit documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Agencies See Attached Sunny Ausink Contact Michael Jame Kopick Owner AT&T Mobility Applicant -klA rn ~ "'''"'"'""'' (Signature of Sender): ,So'"'"'~ ~ ... 1,. / )u I ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON -_, \ ) ss ~... ! -~ mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public4n and for the State of Washington Notary (Print): ____ _.:_11...:..-'-'...a....-"{--';-"''-'' =.r',_· ------------ My appointment expires: 11 . ,;z ., 1 • . -, C.:\ .)" rw),0 1 ,.,_ _ Project Name: AT&T Mobility Panther Lake Project Number: · LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A template • affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology * Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region * Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers* Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PD Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher* 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 Ouwamish Tribal Office * 4717 W Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA 98106-1514 KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Environmental Planning Supervisor Ms. Shirley Marroquin 201 s. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 City of Newcastle Attn: Steve Roberge Director of Community Development 13020 Newcastle Way Newcastle, WA 98059 Puget Sound Energy Municipal Liaison Manager Joe Jainga PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-OlW Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept.* Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 39015 -172rid Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program* Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015 172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* Attn: Gretchen Kaehler PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Kent Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Acting Community Dev. Director 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 City of Tukwila Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the notice of application. template -affidavit of service by mailing OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: AT&T Mobility Panther Lake LUA11-024, ECF, CU-A 18809 SE 116th Avenue SE PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) and a Conditional Use Permit to amend an existing wireless telecommunications facility with a new antenna that would provide 4G technology to the surrounding area. The existing monopole ls located at 18809 116th Avenue SE in a Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre zone. The proposal would add three new antennas, remote radio heads, and "SQUJD" suppression onto the existing unstaffed wireless facility. The antenna would be 55.2" x 11.8" x 6.0" is size and would be located within an existing AT&T facility site which is approximately 270 square feet. The overall parcel area is 1.33 acres. The existing AT&T wireless facility is accessed via an access easement off of SE 188th Street, located just north of the subject site. The addition to the existing monopole would not impact any existing trees located at the subject site. No new landscaping or fencing is proposed. There are not critical areas located at the subject site. Currently the site has three cell tower spaces leased and one existing residence. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE (ER() HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on June 24, 2011. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municlpal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, 1425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. Denis Law r City of. -----~M:ay:o~r _____ ........... -1~~J1filJj June 8, 2011 Sunny Ausink PTS 568 1st Avenue S #650 Seattle, WA 98104k Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD (SEPAi DETERMINATION AT&T Mobility Panther Lake, LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A Dear Ms. Ausink: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above- referenced project. The Committee, on June 6, 2011, decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non-Significance. Please see the enclosed ERC Report and Decision for more details. The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030{2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on June 24, 2011. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430- 6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7314. For the Environmental Review Committee, Vanessa Doi bee Senior Planner Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Sunny Ausink Page 2 of2 June 8, 2011 Enclosure cc: Michael James Kopick / Owner AT&T Mobility/ Applicant H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PROJECTS\11-024.Vanessa\ERC Determination Ltr DNS 11-024.doc Denis Law Mayor June 8, 2011 Washington State r t _..,,,..,._~ Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98S04-7703 Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPAi DETERMINATION Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on June 6, 2011: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: AT&T Mobility Panther Lake LUAll-024 ECF, CU-A 18809 116'~ Avenue SE The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPAi Review and a Conditional Use Permit to amend an existing wireless telecommunications facility with a new antenna that would provide 4G technologyto the surrounding area. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before S:00 p.m. on June 24, 2011. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7314. For the Environmental Review Committee, Vanessa Dolbee Senior Planner Enclosure Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Washington State Departme1 Page 2 of 2 June 81 2011 :cology cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Boyd Powers, Department of Natural Resources Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, NW Region Larry Fisher, WDFW Duwamish Tribal Office US Army Corp. of Engineers DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NO(S): APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ADVISORY NOTES LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A AT&T Mobility AT&T Mobility Panther Lake DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) and a Conditional Use Permit to amend an existing wireless telecommunications facility with a new antenna that would provide 4G technology to the surrounding area. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 18809 116th Avenue SE The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning: 1. RMC 4-4-030C.2 limits the haul hours between 8:30 am and 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Division. 2. Commercial, multi-family, new single-family, and other non-residential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between 7:00 am and 8:00 pm. Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between 9:00 am and 8:00 pm. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. ERC Advisory Notes Page 1 of 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) APPLICATION NUMBER: APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A AT&T Mobility AT&T Mobility Panther Lake DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) and a Conditional Use Permit to amend an existing wireless telecommunications facility with a new antenna that would provide 4G technology to the surrounding area. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 18809 1161h Avenue SE LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on June 24, 2011. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Community Services Department June 10, 2011 June 7, 2011 Mark Peterson, Administrator Fire & Emergency Services 0/11 Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMU" AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT _ ("'""""'city of , ------~J;__ JJ[CJJJ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REPORT & DECISION ERC MEETING DATE: Project Name: Owner: Applicant: Contact: File Number: Project Manager: Project Summary: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Area: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: June 6, 2011 AT&T Mobility Panther Lake Michael James Kopick, 18809 116'h Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058 AT&T Mobility, 16221 NE 72"d Way, RTC 3, Redmond, WA 98052 Sunny Ausink, PTS, 568 1" Avenue S. #605, Seattle, WA 98104 LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) and a Conditional Use Permit to amend an existing wireless telecommunications facility with a new antenna that would provide 4G technology to the surrounding area. The existing monopole is located at 18809 116th Avenue SE in a Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre zone. The proposal would add three new antennas, remote radio heads, and "SQUID" suppression onto the existing unstaffed wireless facility. The antenna would be 55.2" x 11.8" x 6.0" is size and would be located within an existing AT&T facility site which is approximately 270 square feet. The overall parcel area is 1.33 acres. The existing AT&T wireless facility is accessed via an access easement off of SE 1881h Street, located just north of the subject site. The addition to the existing monopole would not impact any existing trees located at the subject site. No new landscaping or fencing is proposed. There are not critical areas located at the subject site. Currently the site has three cell tower spaces leased and one existing residence. 18809 116th Avenue SE 1,540 SF Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): 1.33 acres Total Building Area GSF: None None 1,540 SF Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). Project Location Mop WAll-024, ECF, CU-A City of Renton Department af CED AT&T MOBILITY PANTHER LAKE ERC and Administrative l tional Use Permit Report & Decision LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A Report of June 6, 2011 Page 2 of 9 IFRT ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ BACKGROUND A. EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1: Project file ("yellow file") containing the application, reports, staff comments, and other material pertinent to the review of the project. Exhibit 2: Vicinity Map Exhibit 3: Site Plan Exhibit 4: Existing Enlarged Site Plan Exhibit 5: Proposed Enlarged Site Plan Exhibit 6: Existing and Proposed East Elevation Exhibit 7: Aerial Photograph winter (without foliage) Exhibit 8: Aerial Photograph summer (with foliage) B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner(s) of Record: Michael James Kopick, 18809 116'h Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058 2. Zoning Designation: Residential -8 dwelling units/acre (R-8) 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Single Family (RSF) 4. Existing Site Use: Single family home and three wireless communication towers 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: a. North: b. East: c. South: d. West: 6. Access: 7. Site Area: Benson Hill Elementary Schaol{R-8 zone) Single-family residential{R-4 zone) King County Housing Authority -Single-family residential(R-8 zone) Soos Creek water tower and Single-family residential {R-8 zone) Access easement off of SE 188'h Street, located just north of the subject site 1.33 acres C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Comprehensive Plan Zoning Annexation LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A Land Use File No. N/A N/A N/A Ordinance No. 5099 5100 5327 Date 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 03/01/2008 City of Renton Department of CED AT&T MOBILITY PANTHER LAKE ERC and Administrative C tiana/ Use Permit Report & Decision LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A Report of June 6, 2011 Page 3 of 9 D. PROJECT NARRATIVE: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) and an Administrative Conditional Use Permit to amend an existing wireless telecommunications facility with a new antenna that would provide 4G technology to the surrounding area. The existing 100-foot monopole is located at 18809 116th Avenue SE in a Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre zone. AT&T holds a lease on the subject site for the exiting monopole in the northwest corner of the 1.33 acres parcel. In addition, to AT& T's lease two other wireless companies have monopoles on the property. The existing leased area is 270 square feet in size and contains the monopole and a small existing equipment cabinet. The facility currently located at the subject site is an unmanned facility. Maintenance crews access the site via an access easement off of SE 188'h Street located just north of the parcel. SE 188th Street intersects with 116th Avenue SE in the northeast corner of the subject site. The applicant is proposing to add three new antennas, remote radio heads, and "SQUID" suppression onto the existing unstaffed wireless facility. The antenna would be 55.2" x 11.8" x 6.0" in size and would be located within the existing AT&T facility on the existing monopole. In addition, a small "backpack equipment" box, 31"x20"x24", is proposed to be added to the existing equipment cabinet. The applicant has not proposed to modify or expand any of the existing equipment located at the site. Pursuant to the project narrative, submitted with the application, the additional facilities would add 4G technology to the site and would expand AT&T' s network footprint into the City of Renton and the immediate surrounding area. The additional antenna would add on-street and in-car availability of 4G services and well as in-building 4G services in the immediate vicinity of the site. The addition to the existing monopole would not impact any existing trees located at the subject site or add any new impervious services. The only changes proposed at the site would be on the monopole and the small "backpack equipment" box. No new landscaping or fencing is proposed. There are no critical areas located at the subject site. E. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: Water is provided by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. b. Sewer: Sewer is provided by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. c. Surface/Storm Water: No improvements are required for the proposed facility. 2. Streets: The site is served by SE 1881h Street. 3. Fire Protection: Fire service is provided by the City of Renton Fire Department. [ PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A City of Renton Department of CED AT&T MOBILITY PANTHER LAKE £RC and Administrative Corrlitional Use Permit Report & Decision LUAll-024, £CF, CU-A Report of June 6, 2011 Page 4 of 9 A. ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS with a 14-day Appeal Period. B. MITIGATION MEASURES No additional mitigation measures are recommended. C. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1. Aesthetics Impacts: The proposed project would add additional wireless antennas to an existing 100-foot tall monopole. The proposed new antennas would be mounted on an existing triangular support structure located at the 80-foot level on the 100-foot monopole. Currently this support structure contains 6 antennas. The remote radio heads, and "SQUID" suppression system is proposed to be mounted directly to the monopole just below the 80-foot level. The wireless facility is currently visible from surrounding properties and roads. The addition of three antennas, remote radio heads, and "SQUID" suppression system would minimally change the existing visual impact to the neighborhood. Furthermore, just east of the site is an existing water tower that exceeds the height of the proposed location for the antennas, allowing the antennas to blend into the background as viewed from 1161 h Avenue NE. This water tower is surrounded by mature trees. The current monopole is located in the rear of the property approximately 275-feet from 1161h Street. Between the existing monopole and equipment shelter is the single family residence, an accessory building, and a large number of mature trees. In addition, to the "natural" screening provide by the trees surrounding the facility the applicant has proposed to paint the new antennas and ancillary equipment to match the existing facility. Based on the existing vegetation, the presence of a water tower and the Applicant's proposal to paint the facility, little to no aesthetic impacts are anticipated by the additional equipment proposed to be added to the existing facility. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is required. Nexus: None required. D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant." ./' Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report. LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A City of Renton Department of CED AT&T MOBILITY PANTHER LAKE ERC and Administrative C tional Use Permit Report & Decision LUAll-024, £CF, CU-A Report of June 6, 2011 Page 5 of 9 J>ART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONAL USE J>ERMIT REVIEW A_ APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts • Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts • Section 4-2-060: Zoning Use Table • Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards 2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards • Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations • Section 4-4-140: Wireless Communication Facilities 4. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria • Section 4-9-030): Special Decision Criteria for Wireless Communication Facilities In Lieu of Standard Criteria 5. Chapter 11 Definitions B. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Utilities Element: Policies U-100 and U-101 C. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. Environmental Review In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the Determination of Non-Significance issued on June 6, 2011 addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 2. Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures Not applicable. 3. Staff Review Comments Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of this report. 4. Consistency with Special Decision Criteria for Wireless Communication Facilities In Lieu of Standard Criteria The governing authority shall consider the following factors in determining whether to issue a conditional use permit, although the governing authority may waive or reduce the burden on the applicant of one or more of these criteria if the governing authority concludes that the goals of RMC 4-4-140, Wireless Communication Facilities, are better served thereby. LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A City of Renton Deportment of CED AT&T MOBILITY PANTHER LAKE ERC and Administrative (. tional Use Permit Report & Decision LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A Report of June 6, 2011 Page 6 of9 a) Height of the proposed tower. The proposed project would add additional wireless antennas to an existing 100-foot tall monopole. The proposed new antennas would be mounted on an existing triangular support structure located at the 80-foot level on the 100-foot monopole. Currently this support structure contains 6 antennas. The remote radio heads, and "SQUID" suppression system is proposed to be mounted directly to the monopole just below the 80-foot level. The addition of the antennas and ancillary equipment would not increase the height of the structure. b) Proximity of the tower to residential structures and residential district boundaries. The proposed antennas and ancillary equipment would be mounted on an existing monopole located in the R-8 zone. Under the existing condition three monopoles are located on the subject site. The closest single-family residence to the existing AT&T facility is located on the same parcel and is approximately 130 feet from the monopole. To the south the closest residential structure is 250-feet away and to the west it is approximately 290 feet to the nearest residential structure. To the north the Benson Hill Elementary School is approximately 290 feet from the existing facility. The addition of the antennas and ancillary equipment would not increase the proximity to residential structures or residential district boundaries beyond current conditions. c) Nature and uses on adjacent and nearby properties. The adjacent and nearby properties are developed with primarily single-family residential homes, however just north ofthe site is the Benson Hill Elementary School and directly east is a Soos Creek water tower. d) Surrounding topography. The project site is relatively flat and the project proposal would not result in any ground disrupting activity. e} Surrounding tree coverage and foliage. Under current conditions, mature trees and vegetation exist to the east and west of the existing facility providing vision al screening and improving the aesthetics of the area. f) Design of the tower, with particular reference to design characteristics that have the effect of reducing or eliminating visual obtrusiveness. There is no proposed new tower. The proposed antennas and ancillary equipment would be mounted on the existing monopole. All new equipment is proposed to be painted to match the existing facility. g) Proposed ingress and egress. Currently the site is access via an access easement off of SE 18s'h Street located just north of the parcel. SE 1881h Street intersects with 1161h Avenue SE in the northeast corner of the subject site. Site ingress and egress will not change as a result of the proposed project. h) Potential noise, light and glare impacts. LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A City of Renton Deportment of CED AT&T MOBILITY PANTHER LAKE ERC and Administrative C tionol Use Permit Report & Decision WAll-{)24, ECF, CU-A Report of June 6, 2011 Page 7 of 9 No lights are included in the proposed project. No light, glare, or noise would be produced as a result of the installation of the proposed new equipment. i) Availability of suitable existing towers and other structures. The proposed antennas would be collocated on an existing monopole which currently has wireless antennas mounted on it. j) Compatibility with general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City. The proposed project is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance, and wireless communication facility regulations. D. FINDINGS: Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1. Location: The subject site is located at 18809 1161h Avenue SE. 2, Governing Regulations: The regulations pertaining to wireless communication facilities in the R-8 zone are covered under RMC 4-2-060 and RMC 4-2-llOA. 3. Review Criteria: The analysis of the proposal according to conditional use permit criteria for wireless communication facilities is found in the body of the staff report. 4. Request: The applicant has requested approval for three new antennas, remote radio heads, and "SQUID" suppression on to the existing unstaffed wireless facility. 5. Administrative Conditional Use Permit: The applicant's administrative conditional use permit submittal materials comply with the requirements necessary to process a conditional use permit for a wireless communication facility. 6. Zoning: The site is located in the Residential -8 dwelling units per net acre (R-8) zone. 7. Existing Land Uses: a. North: Benson Hill Elementary School(R-8 zone) b. East: c. South: d. West: Single-family residential(R-4 zone) King County Housing Authority -Single-family residential(R-8 zone) Soos Creek water tower and Single-family residential (R-8 zone) 8. Topography: The site is flat and the project proposal would not result in any ground disrupting activity. E. CONCLUSION: 1. The proposed antenna meets the 10 special decision criteria to be considered in making a decision on a conditional use permit request as specified in RMC 4-9-030J. Such criteria include the height of the proposed facility, proximity to residential structures and residential district boundaries, nature and uses on adjacent and nearby properties, surrounding topography, surrounding tree coverage and foliage, design, ingress and egress, potential noise, light and glare impacts, availability of other structures, and compatibility with the general purpose, goals, objectives and LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A City of Renton Department of CED AT&T MOBILITY PANTHER LAKE ERC and Administrative l tional Use Permit Report & Decision LUAll-024, £CF, CU-A Report of June 6, 2011 Page 8 of 9 standards ofthe Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance, wireless communication facility regulations, and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City. F. DECISION: The AT&T Mobility Panther Lake, File No. LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A, is approved. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURE: c:··, f' . d (" . ,-- C. E. "Chip" Vincent, Planning Director TRANSMITTED this 10th day of June, 2011 to the Contact/Applicant/Owner(s): Contact: Sunny Ausink PTS, 568 1" Avenue S. #605 Seattle, WA 98104 Applicant: AT&T Mobility 16221 NE 12"' Way, RTC 3 Redmond, WA98052 TRANSMITTED this 10th day of June, 2011 to the Party(ies) of Record: None TRANSMITTED this 10th day of June, 2011 to the following: Neil Watts, Development Services Director Kayren Kittrick, Development Services Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Renton Reporter Owner(s): Michael James Kopick 1880911/ih Ave. SE Renton, WA 98058 LAND USE ACTION APPEALS, REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION, & EXPIRATION The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the decision date. APPEAL: This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before S:00 PM on June 24, 2011. An appeal of the decision(s) must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.07S(3); WAC 197-11-680). Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee to Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7th Floor, (425) 430-6510. LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A City of Renton Department of CED AT&T MOBILITY PANTHER LAKE Report of June 6, 2011 ERC and Administrative L itionol Use Permit Report & Decision LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A Page 9 of 9 RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days of the decision date, any party may request that a decision on a short plat be reopened by the Administrator (Decision-maker). The Administrator (Decision-maker) may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator (Decision-maker) finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14-day appeal timeframe. EXPIRATION: The Administrative Conditional Use permit decision will expire two (2) years from the date of decision pursuant to RMC 4-8-lOOH. A single one (1) year extension may be requested pursuant to RMC 4- 8-1001. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE: Provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning the land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial decision, but to Appeals to the Hearing Examiner as well. All communications after the decision/approval date must be made in writing through the Hearing Examiner. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the appeal by the Court. ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. RMC 4-4-030C.2 limits the haul hours between 8:30 am and 3:30 pm Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Planning Division. 2. Commercial, multi-family, new single-family, and other non-residential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between 7:00 am and 8:00 pm Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between 9:00 am and 8:00 pm. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A ' ~ g i I ~ ~t 8~ ; _, ~ ~ Cll I g " Q)) I ii L_L_ L -3S 3AV HlOll -~-. _I_ ~- S~D~6 VM ·~o.L~3b 3S 31\f rlllll I r,o~~I 6LS0l£/£L9V,\\ 3>IV1 i:13HlNV d {H ~R m1!1 ~~ 2" ~j g.:~ I !• -' ' " ii ·' 8~ ~ i-" 1! ... ; I 0 I < 1 I- ! N I- I-I a:I 1-1 ::c X w ! ~ " ~ -· ' c6 I 8~ _, m, 1 ®) 1 ! f2 ~ 67, '"'"'">"''0 !! " :c--------__ ) ·, s, I lli i I I ! I ~ ' B ~ i § ( C IC le (> ic I 11;;0\/6 w .. ·~ol~3~ ~S ],W ~.llll, 63H~I 6L<;OlfJ£L9\i.\\ 3>IV1 tl3HlNVJ r,. " .o,-.oo,: 311 .4J.ll3dOlld 1! ,, ii} " C ., -~s ., !:':' ~:i C ~ I < , . ~ ~ i! n I if:: I 1, 11 I I ?:! ----<~""1----!:r ,'·~ 11 f', ,· r ~ ,, i! r,. \;.. .. : ! ! i ! I M I- I-I ca 1-1 ::c >< w " j iH < g;;;ig5 ~II 'N::ll\3U 3S 3.W -tillll 6DQQ, '! . ! p 6LS01£/£L9VN1 i'' " 3>1V1 ti3HlNV d I j • ~ ! = ,., 0 / / " " lb:: • .=-, -x -x -x I ( i I I, " ji ~g <I ~B 8' :; ' ' ' / / / / > ' ' I ' ! ' N I < ! I ! ! ! ' i: I I ! -' "' ~ t- i-I cc 1-1 ::c >< LU ~ ~ "' ~ j~ ~ I!! ~ ~~ ' g~o~6 ~M 'NOJN3<J ~s -\/\~ hJ9. l oo~gi , 'I ~=, ~ i~ ~ ~--~ ~; 6/~0lt/f.L9V/\\ ,, ~ I ~ e ~ ~ ii ~~ J)IV1 1:13H.LNV<l Ii !i '. 0 C: 0 c:: ,r-X -x --, -, -x -x -X -x -• -• -• -x-x -X -, -X -X-X -• -X -• -• -• ~ ·~ 1 'Do ~J ! 'oif !-ai c ~ ·--~ I! u iQ I I I I ii 5! ,, I !i I as I ,) -"""'"""""'''"""'""""' -•·.OZ =~---------J. a~ l ,, Ii l !; I !" ,! ,I js it !i ' ("f") I < l ! I • ! ! I • I ' ._ ! '6 l roi 0))) i ! ; ,;;Q96 ~M 'NOJN3i:, 3S JNV HJ.9,l sna1 6L50JUEL9VA\ 3>IV11-13HlNV J ht .q p~ ~ [ ~ !! :1 !:i"- '-... "T" I < ~: \0 ·~·~ ... ~~ n .... ~~ cc :;:: .... N ::c z >< 0 F w ~ ~ d ~ 0 ~ g~ ~ I i ! ! ' [! ·' i I i .-. ' ' ~ Map Title 108.1 City of Renton, Washington EXHIBIT 7 Lakes and Rivers Parcels • Renton Fire Hydrant • Other System Fire Hydrant Street Names Rights of Way Streets Roads Jurisdictions Bellevue Des Moines Issaquah Kent King Cou nty Mercer Island Newcastle RENTON SeaTac Seattle Tu kwila Aeria l (March 2010) • Red. Ba nd_ 1 [] G reen : Band_2 • Blue · Band_3 1: 649 @ 8.5" X 11 " 0 enerated static output from an Internet mapping site and Data laye rs that appear on this map may or may not be I I Enler Map Description accurate , current, or olherwise reliab le. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 1~ 108.1 0 54 .06 City of Re nton, Washington Map Title 108.1 Feet EXHIBIT 8 ed stat ic output from an Intern et mapping site and ayers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current , o r otherwise reliable. ; MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NA VI GATION Lakes and R ive rs D Parce ls + Renton F ire Hydrant + Other System Fire Hydr an t Street Names Rights of Way Streets Roads Jurisdict ion s Bellevue Des Mo ines Issaquah Kent Ki ng County Mercer Island Newcastle RENTON SeaTa c Seattle Tukllli la A erial (June 2009) • Red : Band_ 1 • Green Band_2 • Blue. Band_3 1: 649 @8.5" X 11 " Notes Enter Map Description 0 City of ENVIRONMENTAL & on Department of Community & Economic /opment DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'Prcoe< f.-1 Svcs. . .__) APPLICATION NO: LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A APPLICANT: AT&T Mobility PROJECT TITLE: AT&T Mobility Panther Lake SITE AREA: 1.33 acres LOCATION: 18809 116'h Avenue SE COMMENTS DUE: MAY 26, 2011 DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 12, 2011 PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT REVIEWER: EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 1,540 square feet PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A SHEET SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) and a Conditional Use Permit to amend an existing wireless telecommunications facility with a new antenna that would provide 4G technology to the surrounding area. The existing monopole is located at 18809 116th Avenue SE in a Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre zone. The proposal would add three new antennas, remote radio heads, and "SQUID" suppression on to the existing unstaffed wireless facility. The antenna would be 55.2" x 11.8" x 6.0" is size and would be located within an existing AT & T facility site which is approximately 270 square feet. The overall parcel area is 1.33 acres in area. The existing AT & T wireless facility is accessed via an access easement off of SE 188th Street, located just north of the subject site. The addition to the existing monopole would not impact any existing trees located at the subject site. No new landscaping or fencing is proposed. There are not critical areas located at the subject site. Currently the site has three cell tower spaces leased and one existing residence. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housirin Air Aesthetics Water Liaht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans--rtation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,DOOFeet 14,000Feet 8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. , . ' ·, Signature of Director or Aut"horized Representative Date 1 City oJ on Department of Community & Economic 'iopment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 0 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: MAY 26, 2011 '.) <O ,;--1 ~ c-< --~ APPLICATION NO: LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 12, 2011 ___,.,, I-' -< ;," PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee APPLICANT: AT&T Mobility nr - r::::? :,:; PROJECT TITLE: AT&T Mobility Panther Lake PROJECT REVIEWER: "' -c::, 0·' .... SITE AREA: 1-33 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 1,540 square feet LOCATION: 18809 116'" Avenue SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A Cf) SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) and a Conditional Use Permit to amend an existing wireless telecommunications facility with a new antenna that would provide 4G technology to the surrounding area. The existing monopole is located at 18809 116th Avenue SE in a Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre zone. The proposal would add three new antennas, remote radio heads, and "SQUID" suppression on to the existing unstaffed wireless facility. The antenna would be 55.2" x 11.8" x 6.0" is size and would be located within an existing AT & T facility site which is approximately 270 square feet. The overall parcel area is 1.33 acres in area. The existing AT & T wireless facility is accessed via an access easement off of SE 188th Street, located just north of the subject site_ The addition to the existing monopole would not impact any existing trees located at the subject site_ No new landscaping or fencing is proposed. There are not critical areas located at the subject site. Currently the site has three cell tower spaces leased and one existing residence. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT {e.g. Non-Code} COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information En11ironment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Liaht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Tramaortotion Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,0DOFeet ' 8. POLICY-RELATEO COMMENTS vi; 1-£//.R.. Cc/Lz I L,(_) c,t, '}'Yp ?l<A fc::i ~ Cv; J0 - C. COOE-RELATED COMMENTS '1itvU2 a1.,e_ rw ~~/J'-ryca~ le> 1£~ /:o ~ We hove reviewed this application wi particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact additional informatt6n · needed to properly assess this proposal. 5a~-! I Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date r I ;o m 0 11 ,.~ ~ .. f1 ! 0 City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: &nstru.ch <'11 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 26, 2011 APPLICATION NO: LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 12, 2011 .. · APPLICANT: AT&T Mobility PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee . .· PROJECT TITLE: AT&T Mobility Panther Lake PROJECT REVIEWER: SITE AREA: 1.33 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 1,540 square feet LOCATION: 18809 116'" Avenue SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) and a Conditional Use Permit to amend an existing wireless telecommunications facility with a new antenna that would provide 4G technology to the surrounding area. The existing monopole is located at 18809 116th Avenue SE in a Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre zone. The proposal would add three new antennas, remote radio heads, and "SQUID" suppression on to the existing unstaffed wireless facility. The antenna would be 55.2" x 11.8" x 6.0" is size and would be located within an existing AT & T facility site which is approximately 270 square feet. The overall parcel area is 1.33 acres in area. The existing AT & T wireless facility is accessed via an access easement off of SE 188th Street, located just north of the subject site. The addition to the existing monopole would not impact any existing trees located at the subject site. No new landscaping or fencing is proposed. There are not critical areas located at the subject site. Currently the site has three cell tower spaces leased and one existing residence. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Lioht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Tronsoortotion Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ii Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: MAY 26, 2011 APPLICATION NO: LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 12, 2011 APPLICANT: AT&T Mobility PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: AT&T Mobility Panther Lake PROJECT REVIEWER: SITE AREA: 1.33 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 1,540 square feet LOCATION: 18809 116" Avenue SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/ A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) and a Conditional Use Permit to amend an existing wireless telecommunications facility with a new antenna that would provide 4G technology to the surrounding area. The existing monopole is located at 18809 116th Avenue SE in a Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre zone. The proposal would add three new antennas, remote radio heads, and "SQUID" suppression on to the existing unstaffed wireless facility. The antenna would be 55.2" x 11.8" x 6.0" is size and would be located within an existing AT & T facility site which is approximately 270 square feet. The overall parcel area is 1.33 acres in area. The existing AT & T wireless facility is accessed via an access easement off of SE 188th Street, located just north of the subject site. The addition to the existing monopole would not impact any existing trees located at the subject site. No new landscaping or fencing is proposed. There are not critical areas located at the subject site. Currently the site has three cell tower spaces leased and one existing residence. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g, Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinrl Air Aesthetics Water Unht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans~"rtation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000Feet 14,000Feet 8. POL/CY-RELA TEO COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to prope ly assess this proposal. / -~ Signature of Director or Authorized Date I City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: MAY 26, 2011 APPLICATION NO: LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 12, 2011 ;•_ .. :, -~ APPLICANT: AT&T Mobility PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: AT&T Mobility Panther Lake PROJECT REVIEWER: SITE AREA: 1.33 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 1,540 square feet LOCATION: 18809 116'h Avenue SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) and a Conditional Use Permit to amend an existing wireless telecommunications facility with a new antenna that would provide 4G technology to the surrounding area. The existing monopole is located at 18809 116th Avenue SE in a Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre zone. The proposal would add three new antennas, remote radio heads, and "SQUID" suppression on to the existing unstaffed wireless facility. The antenna would be 55.2" x 11.8" x 6.0" is size and would be located within an existing AT & T facility site which is approximately 270 square feet. The overall parcel area is 1.33 acres in area. The existing AT & T wireless facility is accessed via an access easement off of SE 188th Street, located just north of the subject site. The addition to the existing monopole would not impact any existing trees located at the subject site. No new landscaping or fencing is proposed. There are not critical areas located at the subject site. Currently the site has three cell tower spaces leased and one existing residence. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinq Air Aesthetics Water Liaht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnnrtation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000Feet 14,000Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS \,)~ We have reviewed this applicat;on with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Date/ / City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REv1Ew1NG DEPARTMENT: Pian hev;ew COMMENTS DUE: MAY 26, 2011 APPLICATION NO: LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 12, 2011 APPLICANT: AT&T Mobility PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: AT&T Mobility Panther Lake PROJECT REVIEWER: . SITE AREA: 1.33 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 1,540 square feet LOCATION: 18809 116'h Avenue SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N / A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) and a Conditional Use Permit to amend an existing wireless telecommunications facility with a new antenna that would provide 4G technology to the surrounding area. The existing monopole is located at 18809 116th Avenue SE in a Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre zone. The proposal would add three new antennas, remote radio heads, and "SQUID" suppression on to the existing unstaffed wireless facility. The antenna would be 55.2" x 11.8" x 6.0" is size and would be located within an existing AT & T facility site which is approximately 270 square feet. The overall parcel area is 1.33 acres in area. The existing AT & T wireless facility is accessed via an access easement off of SE 188th Street, located just north of the subject site. The addition to the existing monopole would not impact any existing trees located at the subject site. No new landscaping or fencing is proposed. There are not critical areas located at the subject site. Currently the site has three cell tower spaces leased and one existing residence. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Liaht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animafs Trans,:,ortotion Environmentaf Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,0DOFeet 14,0DOFeet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. DatJ NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE, !ANO USE NUMBER: ~AOJECT NA.ME: May :2, lOll AT&T Mobility Panthe, lake PROJ~CT llESCIUPTION, . _ Th• app1lc_ant is re'qU@>llng Envir,:mmestal Review (SEPA) and , Conditiooal u,. Porm,110 •m•nd an e>lst,~11 w,rel,., :•locommunocation, facility with a n•w antenn• I hat would provid@ 4G t«t>nology le _th• ,urroundlng area. ,ho "'"ling monopole" located al UH09 116th Avenue SE In a Re,idenllal a (~-gl dwelling uorl< P•t_n•t acre zon• Tr>e Oropo,al would add !hre, new ~ntenna,, remoto radio head,, and "SQUID" ,uppruslon on lo thft ••i,t,ng un,.affed wl,ele,s faclllty. The antenna would be 55.2" • 11.B", 6.0" i., ,1,. and .,0 uid ho k>cated w,thin an existing AT & T facility ,lte which I, appnHlmately 270 ,qua"' feet. The DYerall parcel,,..,, ;, l.3l acre, in"'""· The •.,>t,nll ~T & T "'lre.l~s, fa<illty IS ac~s,ed vta an access u..,m•nt off of 5E 188th Str,et. localed )UJI nortl, of th.. subJ•ct ,,te. Th• oddrtro~ lo the eal,1mg monopole would not ,mpact any ,xi<11ng tree; :ocat~ at the ,ub)ect ,it•. No now land,c,p,ng or fenc,ft.11 " prap<lSOd Thore "" Mt critical""" located at the ,ubJect site Curr,nt,Y the lite h, th"'" cell towor ;pac•• le•<«! and one e,i,t,ng residence. ' PRO IE CT LOCATION: 18809 116~ Avenue sr OPTIONAi. OETERMINATION OF NON-51GNIFl_(ANCE 1DN5I: A, the Lead A9"'1cy, the City of Renton ha; d•temiln,;,d that srgmficant envircnmental Impact, are .uni,kely to result from the propo..,d proj•ct. Thereloro, ., permitted under the RCW 43 . .llC.110, the City of Reaton "u,lng the Optional DNS proce,.1 to give no!!c<! that a DNS i, llke,Y to be 1,~ued. Comment perlo~, for the. pro1oct and th< PNl><l••d ONS "'" lnt•srated into a single comment period. Tho"' .,,II be no com~ent period folk,w1ng the is,wanco of the Threshold O•t"mlnation of Non-Signrficance lDNSI. A 14-da appeal period w,11 follow the ls,uan<o or the DNS. Y PERMIT APPLICATION DATf: Aprfl28, 20U NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: May U, 2011 APPLICANT /PROJECT CONT ACT PER50N: Sunny Auslnk, Pn: 568 1" Avenue #650, Soattl, WA 98104 Perml!J/RHl•w RO'qu•<t•d: Othor Pumlt,: which may bl r~ulrod: location whero applf.cat/on m•y be rovlew•d: PU8LIC HEIIRJNG: Envlronm•ntal (SEPAi Rovl•w, Admlnlstrathra Cond~IOflll l/H Pormi! Bulldi"! Permit D<!partment ot Cammunlty & Economic Development ICED)-Plannln1 DM,lon, Six1h Floor Renton CJty Hall, 105S Sou!h Grady W~y, Ron ton, WA 980S7 If 'NU WOSJld lik• to ~· made a party of ,.,,ord ID rece;,,, further laformation on thl, proposed project, comp le I'!! tnls form and return to: City ol Rentoa, <::ED -Planning ;;Jivmon, 105S So. GradrW•y, Renton, WA 98057 Name/File No .. Af&T Mob<ll!y Pantlier Lake/LUAll-024, ECF, CU,A NAME ------------------------------ MAILING AOORES.S: THEPHONE NO .. CONSISTENCY ovrnVIEW 2onln,.ft,nd u,e EnvlronmonUI Oocumoni,: thot Evaluale the Pr,,po,ed P,o)ocl, !l•nlop.,,ent Reilul~tlon• Used For Project Mitigation: The '"IJJ~cl 11te i, dp,i~oaled Kes,den!,al Single Fi!rn1ly iRSf) oa 'h~ Gty of Renton Cuo,prchen;i•e Land Use Map and Res,dent,al a (R SJ on the Gtv'; 7.on,ng .\1ap Envlronmental lSEPA) Chec\;'.lst The project will b• subject to th• Ci\y'5 Sf PA ordinance, RMC ~-9·070, RMC 4-9- 030, RMC 4-4-140 and other applicable code, and regulalk>ns a, •ppropriate. Commen\J on the above appllndon mu,t be ,ubmltud In writing to Vane"~ D<llbe~. Senior Planner, CEO -Plannl"i; OM,lon, 1055 Sauth Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on May 26, 2011. If you hav• qu«tio,,, about lh15 proposal. or .. 1,h to be made, panv or record and receN• oddltlonal notificatloa t,y ma,I, con tac. t~• Project Manager. Anvone who submits written comm Mt> will •~tom•t,callv become a party of record and will be notified of any deci,ion on thil project CONTACT PERSON: Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7314; Eml: vdolbee@rentonwa.gov PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE 1DENT1F1CAT10N CERTIFICATION I I, /;j)(1 e ').j( C L)., j /;, (cc 1:. , hereby certify that .~ copies of the above document were posted in::?, conspicuous places or nearby the described property on Date: 5 / t 2-/t ( d/ ,-, I I Signed:-@'1--,.;/1/\11, -l)/1.,t L.• e, '- STATE OF WASHINGTON 55 COUNTY OF KING CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 12th day of May, 2011, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter, Notice of Application, Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Agencies -NOA, Env. Checklist, PMT See Attached 300' Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only See Attached Sunny Ausink Contact Kopick Michael James Owner AT & T Mobility Applicant (Signature of Sender): ~ ·7)1 ~,--- STATE OF WASHINGTON / ~ ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 11/r:J I '3/ XO ii Notary \;blic in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print): ___ _,H"'-'-. ..::I.......J.<:J...£;""'-'"----------------- My appointment expires: A ""'.J "'" 1 J_ C. 1 ;) o G Project Name: · AT&T Mobility Panther Lake Project Num.~er:·. LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology * Environmental Review Section PO Box47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region * Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS·240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers * Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 AGENCY (DOE) LEITER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher• 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 Duwamish Tribal Office * 4717 W Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA 98106-1514 KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Environmental Planning Supervisor Ms. Shirley Marroquin 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 City of Newcastle Attn: Steve Roberge Director of Community Development 13020 Newcastle Way Newcastle, WA 98059 Puget Sound Energy Municipal Liaison Manager Joe Jainga PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-OlW Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept.* Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 39015 -172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program * Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* Attn: Gretchen Kaehler PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Kent Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Acting Community Dev. Director 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 City ofTukwila Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS11 , the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the notice of application. template -affidavit of service by mailing 619840004300 ARGUETA SONIA MARITZA 18812 116TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 322305914903 FACILITIES & OPERATIONS CTR OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIR 300 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98055 619780016306 KERI LANETIE R 11618 SE 188TH ST RENTON WA 98058 619840004508 LOPEZ CARLOTA B+OLVERA ARTU 18802 116TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 156595101007 ORSTAD RUSS 19824 SE 296TH ST KENT WA 98042 322305914309 SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER PO BOX 58039 RENTON WA 98058 156595031006 TRAN YVONNE 18830 113TH WAY SE RENTON WA 98055 619780016207 BOUDON GLEN D+JOHANNA 11022 239TH PL SW WOODWAY WA 98020 619840006404 FEUERBORN MICHAEL J+AMY K 29258 SE 208TH ST MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 322305907501 KOPICK MICHAEL JAMES 18809 116TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 156595033002 LUONG CHIOS JAY+KESHIA P 18816 113TH WAY SE RENTON WA 98055 619840004102 RAQUEL ARTEMIO ULEP+ADORACION H 19433 138TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 619840004201 STREHLO STEPHEN C 11619 SE 188TH ST RENTON WA 98058 619780016009 TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH 18652 116TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 619840004003 DAVIS DAVID L+DOREEN S 18818 116TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 322305903609 KC HOUSING AUTHORITY 600 ANDOVER PARK W TUKWILA WA 98188 619780016108 LANCASTER CARTER F 11618 SE 188TH RENTON WA 98055 619840004409 MOORE JAMES D 18820 116TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 619780016405 RUDO JEREMY H+RONA S FRIMME 527 N 70TH ST SEATILE WA 98103 156595032004 TEKIE MERHAWI HAILE+ALMAZ H 18824 113TH WAY SE RENTON WA 98055 aa rt# ~r; r ... City of sf,i· LJjfJ NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: LAND USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: May 12, 2011 LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A AT&T Mobility Panther Lake PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) and a Conditional Use Permit to amend an existing wireless telecommunications facility with a new antenna that would provide 4G technology to the surrounding area. The existing monopole is located at 18809 116th Avenue SE in a Residential 8 {R-8) dwelling units per net acre zone. The proposal would add three new antennas, remote radio heads, and "SQUID" suppression on to the existing unstaffed wireless facility. The antenna would be 55.2" x 11.8" x 6.0" is size and would be located within an existing AT & T facility site which is approximately 270 square feet. The overall parcel area is 1.33 acres in area. The existing AT & T wireless facility is accessed via an access easement off of SE 188th Street, located just north of the subject site. The addition to the existing monopole would not impact any existing trees located at the subject site. No new landscapins or fencing is proposed. There are not critical areas located at the subject site. Currently the site has three cell tower spaces leased and one existing residence. PROJECT LOCATION: 188091161 h Avenue SE OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is usins the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be i5sued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: April 28, 2011 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: May 12, 2011 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Sunny Ausink, PTS; 568111 Avenue #650, Seattl, WA 98104 Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Administrative Conditional Use Permit Building Permit None Department of Community & Economic Development {CED) -Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 N/A If you wou!d like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED-Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: AT&T Mobility Panther Lake/LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A NAME:------------------------------------ MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The subject site is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Residential -8 (R-8) on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental (SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-9-070, RMC 4-9- 030, RMC 4-4-140 and other applicable codes and regulations .is appropriate. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner, CED -Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on May 26, 2011. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7314; Eml: vdolbee@rentonwa.gov PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION '.~· .·-~,;! .i~ ~=-'~t ; ', i17'Jfi\~ ~. ·11w. Ii~ ,, 4""'i •!· ' ' s §\. Denis Law Mayor May 12, 2011 Sunny Ausink PTS 568 1'' Avenue S #650 Seattle, WA 98104 Cityof 1 ·~JJWll r t\ ·-Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator Subject: Notice of Complete Application AT&T Mobility Panther Lake, LUAll-024, ECF, CU-A Dear Ms. Ausink: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on June 6, 2011. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7314 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~-I'JJfuui_ Vanessa Dolbee Senior Planner cc: Kopick Michael James/ Owner(s} AT&T Mobility/ Applicant Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov ' 'i ~ I, ' City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: KOPICK MICHAEL JAMES AT&T MOBILITY WA673 PANTHER LAKE PROJECTIADDRESS(S)ILOCATION AND ZIP CODE: ADDRESS 1/3€09 l I P" -1% _'£ 18809 116th Ave SE, Renton, WA CITY R81-JTON ZIP: q8o5"B KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): TELEPHONE NUMBER: f:25 -22-Z ~ J 7f7 3223059075 APPLICANT (if other than owner) EXISTING LAND USE(S): NAME: AT&T MOBILITY EXISTING CELL TOWER PROPOSED LAND USE(S): COMPANY (if applicable): MODIFICATION TO EXISTING CELL TOWE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: 16221 NE 72ND WAY, RTC 3 RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CITY: REDMOND ZIP: 98052 (if applicable) RESIDENTIAL EXISTING ZONING: TELEPHONE NUMBER: 2.o<.t; -~ 'r () -q oco R-8 RESIDENTIAL CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): ['iON'8. SITE AREA (in square feet): NAME: SUNNY AUSINK J.h' x;VJO I c;.JT!:; /,REA/ ATtT ~A ,ii:,.',.\ SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (if applicable): PTS DEDICATED: \\J o NE. , D -s~ r--r . SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: ADDRESS: 568 1ST AVENUE s. #650 boo s& rEeT (en s(/1\)~) PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: SEATTLE ZIP: 98104 ACRE (if applicable) NoNfc, TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) 206-446-0448 !~ON~ SAUSINK@PTSWA.COM NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): NOi\' l:a- H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\masterapp.doc -1 -06/09 I PROJECT INFORMAT~IO_N~{c_o_n_ti_n_u-'-edc._,I),__ ______ ~ NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 2--· PROJECT VALUE: $15,000 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): Ne 'RSSlret.rf~osBI IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable):, l7o£-,:, Ktr P. F'P J...r SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable) ig()C. Qr F1. / ??D ~ ~-CJ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE . SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL CJ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS (if applicable): NGNf:. CJ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable) ~ Q Nf:.- 1 Q fl;; Pf". CJ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if CJ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. applicable): l\loNe, D ~-ff CJ SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES sq. ft. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): t-10~11:..> \.lNSTA~ ~U It ~ CJ WETLANDS sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION __ ,TOWNSHIP __ , RANGE __ , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON NE 1/ 4 OF NE 1/ 4 OF SE 1/ 4 OF SE 1/ 4 LESS C) ~~ ~ -I .IC .L TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applicati/'\nS being applied for: 1. i~I?bA IN\ ">T<<Ali y& u r,tQ_l11 o\VAI.-US£ 3. ~eR_I\\\T I SEf'r\ 2. 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP -·\U..,../"<-/ I. (Print Name/s) Ac <-..---,-c.." i 1,-v--~ -<---A~ t -c., t S ---S, L.LLhre under penalty of pe~ury under the laws of the State of Washington that r am (please check one) _/'"the current owner of the 13re13e [, Ii ,valved in this application or_ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. entative) \c ~<r f\'l<t \-'-,J l(_,L_ -I() V (Signature of Owner/Representative) H: \CED\Data \F onns-T cmpl atcs\Scl f-Hcl p Handouts\Pl ann ing\mastcrapp. doc I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that f;L~I ~ i signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. tate of Wasl 1h 1gto11 n."t qJS et.l ~k-1ts Notary (Print) --'(Y\'-'"'-C\-'-f\-'-'lif_-.c.( -~-==-ccc.l..ce_=c..._ ( . 2. 06/09 RD PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIRcMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS <WAIV'Et) ... • ... • ... • .. M.· .•. • ... • ...•... P .. • ... • ...•. BP .•..•. "·.'."' .. • .. ·:·.··.'.• .••. ~ ..•. · .. • ... • ... P .. • ..• • ... • ... • ...•. •.• •:art •• , Density Worksheet 4 ,,, Pr~1rn~~~·9mrntnqi:gi~~~:::• ~ Drainage Report 2 $1~m~tipm~:·A~Hi\~(°'fAi·~·~~·#: : y? Environmental Checklist 4 $~i~irn~@Ak#rmH~•IR~s#r~~~88PY1+1 ? t Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Floor Plans 3 AND 4 c-§*pt~c$mi~~1)t~Rmfu:iJ>i\Sl? :: ,.. ••• >···· " Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 ~~#~im~•A,~rn::P~~i1~~f :: :••·•·•> n··· >•············ · Habitat Data Report 4 imrtp~~mt8#rm~1f • t • > Irrigation Plan 4 ~im~ 88HrnW~~~~~p('#• M~P·~~iA~®~··§!\*~··············· Landscape Plan, Conceptual, ·~;~~§ir~Jfli~m: p~i~ii~i~ • :•••••••· •••·•··············· · Legal Description 4 Master Application Form 4 MRm~rn~rfs~r~~Jp9fp%rnPmiim~m1t1 i• :n Neighborhood Detail Map 4 F~r~w~; µpf •~t~r~#·~·f~r~~pim$~rn~i~,~·~······• Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1 . Property Services City of Flenton 1:i1ar1ninr~ Division · .:\T "1 vi~ r_, b i Jih 11 uJ AJ.-..,7 6 PROJECT NAME: kuY·fl 7f',· LLf /({' ArR t 8 11Jl1 oATE: cf I 22/ zc; I 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building 4. Planning H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-He!p Handouts\Planning\waiverofsubmittalreqs.xls 06/09 PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER uF SUBMITTAL REQUIRE:,IIENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Plat Name Reservation 4 m1~~pt1l\#m\19ThM~~®~'~Ymm~i)!J:::r: <> ' Public Works Approval Letter 2 If) o Traffic Study 2 Tri~s~i#/iQ/h~r~@rt~r,rn~~,~~f , , > Urban Design Regulations Analysis 4 D ,µJi@i#:RJ~(1i:!~~~~f#it#~~{ ::::,•••••••••••••••·•··· Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final 4 v.:.J) Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND, Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND, Map of View Area 2 AND, Photosimulations 2 AND, This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services 2. Public Works Plan Review PROJECT NAME:f\l z T n1r:r, 1 l, ~j ltl1&:n:::i} . DATE: 11:ti he¥ c..uu y /11 }?ui 1 3. Building 4. Planning H:\CED\Data\Forms.-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\waiverofsubmittalreqs.x!s 06/09 Pacific Telecom Services, LLC 25 April 2011 City of Renton Planning Division 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE: AT&T Mobility WA673 Panther Lake -Request for ACUP Approval & SEPA Review Dear Reviewing Parties: AT&T Mobility is proposing to modify an existing site at 18809 116'" Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98058; APN#322305-9075. AT&T currently has existing antennas fiush mounted to the existing monopole at the existing site referenced above. AT&T proposes to add (3) new antennas, remote radio heads, and "SQUID" suppression unit to the existing unstaffed wireless telecommunications facility. No expansions to the existing equipment area proposed. Site Description and Context The site is located on an existing monopole owned by American Tower Corporation. The Zoning of parcel is R-8 Residential. This is an existing wireless telecommunications facility; AT&T proposes to amend the facility to keep up with the demand while continuing to offer customers in the area quality service and access to greater and more advanced wireless services. The proposed change would add 4G technology to the site and would expand AT&T's 4G network footprint into the City of Renton and the immediate surrounding area. This proposed change would improve the on-street and in-car availability of 4G services (voice and data support for iPhone 4G phones for example) and would add in-building 4G services in the immediate vicinity of the site. Our current volume and payload data on this site shows a high amount of 3G data traffic. The new 4G technology will improve the overall internet/data experience of the customers in the area. This will mean faster data rate and higher efficiency. The visual impact of this wireless facility will be the largest impact. The wireless facility will be visible from surrounding properties and from the roads in the area. The visual impact of the wireless facility will be mitigated by painting the proposed new antennas and ancillary equipment to match existing. This is a collocation of new antennas on an existing 100 foot monopole. Project Narrative: Project name, size and location of site: Answer: AT&T Mobility WA673 Panther Lake. This is an existing facility. The size of the project is approximately 270 square feet. The project is located on the northwest corner of the parcel at 18809 116'" Avenue SE, Renton, WA. Proposed antenna size is 55.2"x11.8"x6.0", thus this meets the definition of a mini facility per City of Renton codes. The site area is approximately 26'-4"x50", the overall parcel area is 0.03 acres. The existing lease area for AT&T's facility is 10'-8"x26'-4", which is approximately 270 square feet. No new impervious surface will be added to the existing lease area. A small "backpack equipment" (dimensions of 31 "x20"x24") will be mounted to an existing cabinet within the existing lease area. No new landscaping proposed. There are existing evergreen trees to the west of the property, please see attached photos for reference. Land use permits required for proposed project: Answer: Administrative Conditional Use Permit with SEPA AT&T Mobility WA673 Panther Lake -ACUP Application -1 - i Pacific Telecom Services, LLC Zoning designation of the site and adjacent properties: Answer: R-8 Residential Current use of the site and any existing improvements: Answer: Existing 100' tall monopole with existing AT&T antennas/equipment and other carriers and another tower (owned by another carrier) to the north of subject project. A wireless facility owned by another wireless carrier is located to the northeast corner of the property. There are existing residential structures on the property also. Special site features (i.e. wetlands, water bodies, steep slopes) Answer: Not Applicable Statement addressing soil type and drainage conditions Answer: Soil type not known, no new impervious surface introduce. Proposal is for antenna work only. Proposed use of the property and scope of the proposed development: Answer: This is an existing wireless facility in a residential zone. AT&T proposes to modify existing wireless facility by adding (3) new antennas and accessory equipment to existing 100' monopole. No height increase proposed. Access: Answer: Site will be accessed off 1161h Avenue SE Proposed off-site improvements (i.e. installation of sidewalks, fire hydrants, sewer main, etc.) Answer: None proposed. Total estimated construction cost and estimated fair market value of the proposed project Answer: Cost of construction is $15,000 Estimated quantities and type of materials involved if any fill or excavation is proposed Answer: No fill or excavation proposed. Number, type and size of any trees to be removed Answer: This is an existing facility, there are existing trees to the west of the proposed are. No trees will be removed or altered. Explanation of any land to be dedicated to the City Answer: Not Applicable Any proposed job shacks, sales trailers, and/or model homes Answer: Not Applicable Any proposed modifications being requested (include written justification) Answer: This is an existing wireless facility in a residential zone. AT&T proposes to modify existing wireless facility by adding (3) new antennas and accessory equipment to existing 100' monopole. No height increase proposed. Proposal would provide 4G L TE service to the neighborhood and the surrounding areas within the City of Renton. For projects located within 100 feet of a stream or wetland, please include: Answer: Not Applicable Distance in feet from the wetland or stream to the nearest area of work For projects located within 200-feet of Black River, Cedar River, Springbrook Creek, May Creek and Lake Washington please include the following additional information: AT&T MobilityWA673 Panther Lake -ACUP Application -2 - .. ' Pacific Telecom Services, LLC Answer: Not Applicable Distance from closest area of work to the ordinary high water mark. Description of the nature of the existing shoreline Answer: Not Applicable The approximate location of and number of residential units, existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view in the event the proposed project exceeds a height of 35-feet above the average grade level forth the reasons in favor of the application and addressing the following criteria used by the reviewing official in analyzing the application: Answer: Not Applicable. this is an existing 100 foot tall monopole. A. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. Answer: The proposed use will be compatible with general purpose. goals, objectives and standards of the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. This is an existing 100 foot tall monopole with existing AT&T antennas and another carrier. Proposed modifications is an upgrade to existing AT&T facility, thus the additional antennas/equipment would be co-located on the existing tower and would eliminate the need for a new facility. The new antennas will not increase the height of the existing monopole. B. Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need, the reviewing official shall consider the following factors among all other relevant information: The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over-concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed location is suited for the proposed use. Answer: This is an existing wireless telecommunications facility; AT&T proposes to amend the facility to keep up with the demand while continuing to offer customers in the area quality service and access to greater and more advanced wireless services. The proposed change would add 4G technology to the site and would expand AT&T's 4G network footprint into the City of Renton and the immediate surrounding area. This proposed change would improve the on-street and in-car availability of 4G services (voice and data support for iPhone 4G phones for example) and would add in-building 4G services in the immediate vicinity of the site. Our current volume and payload data on this site shows a high amount of 3G data traffic. The new 4G technology will improve the overall internet/data experience of the customers in the area. This will mean faster data rate and higher efficiency. The proposed modifications will not result in either the detrimental over-concentrations of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. By collocating on an existing tower, the proposed use will eliminate the need for additional facilities in the City of Renton. C. Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. In addition the reviewing official shall also consider the following items when analyzing the application. Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. AT&T Mobility WA673 Panther Lake -ACUP Application -3- Pacific Telecom Services, LLC Answer: The administrative conditional use will not be materially detrimental to the uses or property in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. The proposed use will be compatible with the residential scale and the character of the neighborhood since the proposed use will utilize an existing monopole and will not increase the height of the existing monopole. Parking: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as 75% of the lot coverage requirement of the zone in which the proposed use is located if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. Answer: No new parking proposed. Traffic: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in, the surrounding area. Answer: Site will be accessed once a month by maintenance technician. Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians will not be affected. Noise, Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. Answer: The only noise will be from the existing radio equipment which is comparable to the sound of an air conditioner. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by buildings or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. Answer: No landscaping proposed. There is some existing landscaping on the premise to the west of the subject wireless facility. Please see attached photos for reference. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. Answer: Not Applicable. No accessory uses to day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes, and other similar nature. Proposal is to upgrade existing wireless facility and provide better 4G L TE service for AT&T customers in the surrounding areas. Conversion: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the development standards. Public Improvements: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditioned upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities and/or services. Answer: Not applicable, this is an existing wireless facility. No existing building or structure will be changed. Proposed conditional use will not be accessed by the public, this is an unstaffed facility. Lot Coverage: Lot coverage in residential districts (SF and MR) shall not exceed fifty percent of the lot coverage of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Lot coverage in all other zones shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located Answer: Not Applicable. This is an existing wireless facility. No new lot coverage proposed. Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard AT&T Mobility WA673 Panther Lake -ACUP Application -4- 1 -·-r~ Pacific Telecom Services, LLC Answer: Not Applicable. This is an existing wireless facility. Proposed antennas will conform to the requirements of that zone. Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, belltowers, public utility antennas or similar structures may exceed the height requirement upon approval of a variance. Answer: Not Applicable. This is an existing wireless facility. The existing monopole is currently at 100 feet. no height increase proposed. Construction Mitigation Description: The proposed facility is a passive use; there are no activities that will produce airborne emissions, odor, vibration, heat, glare, or noxious/toxic materials. No new impervious surface proposed. No fill and grading proposed. No ground disturbance proposed therefore minimizing dust, transportation impacts, erosion, and mud. The administrative conditional use will not be materially detrimental to the uses or property in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. The site will operate continually, 24 hours a day for seven days a week. The site will be unmanned, requiring only frequent visits by maintenance personnel, typically once a month. On-site construction is proposed between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, for a time period of approximately one month. Vehicular access to the project site during the construction and operational phases of the proposal will be made from 1161h Street. After construction, a maintenance worker will visit the site once a month. Due to the limited amount of traffic generated by the proposal, no off-site street improvements are required for this application. The facility will not require water or wastewater facilities or contribute to erosion due to storm water run-off. This statement is true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand City of Renton is relying on them to make its de,>'".,,_,." Signature: Date submitted: // AT&T Mobility WA673 Panther Lake -ACUP Application -5 - PLANNING DIVISION r··,, - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLISf.i/. PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 ~-lsi r-i The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). -1 - F:\Work\ZONING APPLICATIONS TO WORK ON\APRIL SUBMITTALS\RENTON -WA673 PANTHER LAKE\WA673 PANTHER LAKE-SEPA CHECKLIST Q4..19"2011.doc 06/09 For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: AT&T MOBILITY WA673 PANTHER LAKE 2. Name of applicant: AT&T MOBILITY 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: SUNNY AUSINK/PTS FOR AT&T MOBILITY-568 15T AVENUES. SUITE#650 SEATILE, WA 98104 PHONE: 206-446-0448 EMAIL: SAUSINK@PTSWA.COM 4. Date checklist prepared: 04-28-2011 5. Agency requesting checklist: CITY OF RENTON 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction will begin upon receipt of applicable permits. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Yes, possible upgrade or antennas replacement if need be. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. SEPA checklist 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Renton -ACUP and SEPA DNS -2 - F:\Work\ZONING APPLICATIONS TO WORK ON\APRIL SUBMITTALS\RENTON-WA673 PANTHER LAKE\WA673 PANTHER LAKE -SEPA CHECKLIST 04-19-2011.doc 06109 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. AT&T Mobility proposes modify an existing wireless minor communications facility at address referenced below by proposing to add (3) more antennas ancillary equipment to the facility. -3- F:\Work\ZONING APPLICATIONS TO WORK ON\APRIL SUBMITTALS\RENTON-WA673 PANTHER LAKE\WA673 PANTHER LAKE -SEPA CHECKLIST 04-19-2011.doc 06/09 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 18809 116th Ave SE, Renton, WA APN#: 322305-9075 Legal Description: NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 LESS CO RD LESS S 157 FT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other------- Flat -less than 1% b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Less than 1% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. None Known d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. None proposed, this is an existing wireless facility. No filling or grading proposed. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion could only occur from heavy machinery moving about the site during construction. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not applicable. No ground disturbance proposed. -4- F:\Work\ZONING APPLICATIONS TO WORK ON\APRIL SUBMITTALS\RENTON-WA673 PANTHER LAKE\WA673 PANTHER LAKE· SEPA CHECKLIST 04-19-2011.doc 06/09 I h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Best management practices will be used during construction. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Minimal emissions would result from this proposal. Any possible emissions will be from vehicles entering and leaving site during construction. This is a passive site -no odor, industrial wood smoke will be introduced to the air. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. WATER Minimal emissions would result from this proposal. Any possible emissions will be from vehicles entering and leaving site during construction. No proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air besides the monthly visits to the site by the maintenance technician. a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No -5- F:IWork\ZONING APPLICATIONS TO WORK ON\APRIL SUBMITIALS\RENTON -WA673 PANTHER LAKE\WA673 PANTHER LAKE -SEPA CHECKLIST 04-19-2011.doc 06/09 I b. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None proposed. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No SJ Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. 1) No Ground Water; Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Not Applicable 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not Applicable d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any; . 6. 06109 F:\Work\ZONING APPLICATIONS TO WORK ON\APRIL SUBMITTALS\RENTON -WA673 PANTHER LAKE\WA673 PANTHER LAKE -SEPA CHECKLIST 04,.19-2011.doc Not Applicable 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: __ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _x_ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs _x_ grass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None proposed to be removed or altered, this is an existing wireless facility. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Known d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None Proposed. This is an existing wireless facility. S. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other--------- Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other ----------Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other------- b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None proposed 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. -7 - F:\Work\ZONING APPLICATIONS TO WORK ON\APRIL SUBMITTALS\RENTON -WA673 PANTHER LAKE\WA673 PANTHER LAKE-SEPA CHECKLIST 04-19-2011.doc 06/09 The project will require access to existing Electrical Power and Telephone. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. This is a minor modification to an existing wireless facility and will not have an affect on the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: No energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal. No proposed measures to reduce or control impacts. This is an existing wireless facility, only access to existing electrical power and telephone required. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH b. a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: 1) None proposed. Noise What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The only noise will be from the existing radio equipment which is comparable to the sound of an air conditioner. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None proposed. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Existing wireless telecommunications facility in an R-8 Residential zone. • 8 - F:\Work\ZONING APPLICATIONS TO WORK ON\APRIL SUBMITTALS\RENTON -WA673 PANTHER LAKE\WA673 PANTHER LAKE-SEPA CHECKLIST 04-19-2011.doc 06109 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. Existing wireless telecommunications monopole. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R-5 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Residential g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not Applicable h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None, this is an existing unstaffed wireless telecommunications facility. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None proposed. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposal is a passive use which will not have negative impact on the surrounding properties. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. . 9. F:\Work\ZON1NG APPLICATIONS TO WORK ON\APRJL SUBMITTALS\RENTON -WA673 PANTHER LAKE\WA673 PANTHER LAKE-SEPA CHECKLIST 04-19-2011.doc 06/09 I None proposed. This is an existing unstaffed wireless telecommunications facility. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not Applicable c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None Proposed 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s}, not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Existing one {100) foot tall monopole with existing antennas and equipment. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Additional antennas will be painted to match existing. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? None c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None proposed. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? -10 - F:\Work\ZONING APPLICATIONS TO WORK ON\APRIL SUBMlTTALS\RENTON -WA673 PANTHER LAKE\WA673 PANTHER LAKE· SEPA CHECKLIST 04-19-2011.doc 06109 None identified. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not Applicable. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None identified b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None identified. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None proposed. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 1161h Avenue SE b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No public transportation will be needed for this unmanned wireless telecommunications facility. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? None -11 - F:\Work\ZONING APPLICATIONS TO WORK ON\APRIL SUBMITTALS\RENTON-WA673 PANTHER l.AKE\WA673 PANTHER LAKE-SEPA CHECKLIST 04-19-2011.doc 06/09 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No public transportation will be needed for this unmanned wireless telecommunications facility. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The site will require approximately one (1} visit per month by a technician for site maintenance purposes. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Project would not result in an increased need for public services. Project will provide E-911 GPS to the surrounding properties, thus helping emergency services to locate and provide assistance to those in time of crisis. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. E-911 GPS antenna will have a direct impact on public services, providing GPS locations to emergency services to locate and provide assistance to those in time of crisis. No other measures to reduce or control impacts on public services proposed. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Proposed modifications will require telephone and electricity. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Proposed modifications will require telephone and electricity. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true, correct, and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of • 12 • F:\Work\ZONING APPLICATIONS TO WORK ON\APRIL SU8MITIALS\RENT0N-WAB73 PANTHER LAKE\WA673 PANTHER LAKE-SEPA CHECKLIST 04-19-2011.doc 06109 non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation -~r_wilttot-i,:k of ful!_dis~losure on my part. c__ .~--f} ~ ' Proponent Signature: /::~+ ~ ~---__) Name Printed: __ lsunn_',(Ausi11k _______ _ Date: _04-28-2011 ________ _ -13 - F:\Work\ZONING APPLICATIONS TO WORK ON\APRIL SUBMITTALS\RENTON-WA673 PANTHER LAKE\WA673 PANTHER LAKE -SEPA CHECKLIST 04-19-2011.doc 06109 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and ro rams. You do not need to fill out these sheets for ro·ect actions. Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Not Applicable Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: None proposed 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Not Applicable Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None Proposed 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Not Applicable Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None Proposed 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? Not Applicable Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None proposed s. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? -14 - F:\Work\ZONING APPLICATIONS TO WORK ON\APRIL SUBMITIALS\RENTON • WA673 PANTHER LAKE\WA673 PANTHER LAKE· SEPA CHECKLIST 04-19-2011.doc 06/09 Not applicable Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None proposed 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Not Applicable Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None proposed 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Not Applicable. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true, correct, and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it mi h issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentati or wi ful lac ull disclosure on my part. Name Printed: Date: • , 5 • F:\Work\ZONING APPLICATIONS TO WORK ON\APRIL SUBMITTALS\RENTON -WA673 PANTHER LAKE\WA673 PANTHER LAKE-SEPA CHECKLIST 04-19-2011.doc 06/09 NON-IONIZING ELECTROMAGNETIC EXPOSURE ANALYSIS & ~-. ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION FOR v!,y ot Pp~,ton at&t SITE NUMBER: WA673 PANTHER LAKE SITE NAME: SITE ADDRESS: 18809 116TH AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98058 DATE: April 27, 2011 PREPARED BY: MORRISON HERSHFIELD 10900 NE 81h Street, Suite 81 o Bellevue, WA 98004 425-451-1301 ;='lanni!~:J Division APR 2 8 !U11 -2 - AT&T Site WA673 -3 - INTRODUCTION Morrison Hershfield has been retained by AT & T Wireless ("AT & T") to evaluate a proposed AT&T Mobility telecommunications site as described below. Evaluation is for compliance with current Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and local rules regarding public exposure to radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields (EMFs). PROJECT The proposed AT&T project consists of a WCF (Wireless Communications Facility) located at 188091161h Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98058; Property parcel number 322305-9075. AT&T site No. WA673. The planned improvements will include the addition of antennas as described below. These antennas will be mounted to an existing monopole type tower structure at approximately 80.0' AGL to the centerline of the antennas. All antennas face outward and point directionally away. Therefore it is unlikely that anyone other than authorized RF workers could approach near enough to any of the transmit antennas to cause that person's RF exposure to exceed FCC limits. It is expected that RF exposure conditions near ground level at the site, and at all adjacent properties, due to the contributions from all transmitting antennas will be well below the FCC public exposure limit. PROPOSED EQUIPMENT Type of Service: GSM/UMTS/L TE Cellular Antennas: Sector Azimuth Height Description X 120 80' 1 Kathrein 742 265 Panel Antenna (existing GSM) 120 80' 1 Kathrein 742 265 Panel Antenna (existing UMTS) 105 80' 1 proposed Kathrein 80010764 LTE panel antenna Y: 210 80' 1 Kathrein 742 265 Panel Antenna (existing GSM) 210 80' 1 Kathrein 742 265 Panel Antenna (existing UMTS) 215 80' 1 proposed Kath rein 80010764 L TE panel antenna Z: 0 80' 1 Kathrein 742 265 Panel Antenna (existing GSM) 0 80' 1 Kathrein 742 265 Panel Antenna (existing UMTS) 330 80' 1 proposed Kathrein 80010764 L TE panel antenna AT&T Site WA673 -4 - PROPOSED EQUIPMENT (cont) Maximum Power: 3379 watts CALCULATIONS Calculations for RF power densities near ground level are based on the "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, OET Bulletin 65" Edition 97-01, August 1997; issued by the Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering & Technology. Compliance is determined by comparing RF field predictions with the general population/uncontrolled environment (i.e., "Public") Maximum Permissible Exposure limits (MPEs) allowed by the FCC rules, as specified in CFR 47 §1.1310. The following formula has been used to calculate the power densities at specific locations: Where: S = power density (mW/cm 2) ERP = power in watts S = 0.36 x ERP/ R2 R = distance to the center of the radiation antenna (ft) Formula is based on Equation 9 on page 21 of OET Bulletin 65. It includes the effect of ground reflections. The Effective Radiated Power (ERP) depends on the vertical antenna pattern. THEORETICAL ANALYSIS All existing and proposed transmit antennas are highly directional and project the majority of the transmitted RF energy horizontally and well above all nearby accessible areas. The following theoretical calculations predict the peak exposure condition for a six-foot person standing at the nearest approach to the transmit antennas. A six-foot tall person standing on the ground near the base of the antenna support or building would be at least approximately 74 feet below all of the existing and proposed transmit antennas. AT&T Site WA673 -5 - CONTRIBUTION OF AT&T FACILITY TO RF EXPOSURE ENVIRONMENT Based on information provided by AT&T RF Engineers, the maximum ERP from any sector of the proposed AT&T facility will be less than or equal to 3379 watts with all channels activated. Thus the worst-case downward ERP is 33.79 watt (i.e., 11100th of 100 watts) from the facility. By use of the power density formula previously described, with input values of 33.79 watt downwards ERP, and a distance of 74 feet, the worst-case calculated power density at head height from the AT&T facility to a six-foot person standing at ground level is 0.002221 mW/cm 2 . AT&T antennas will transmit and/or receive at different MHz frequency bands worst case being the L TE at 700 MHz. The Public MPE limit for the L TE frequency transmitted by this facility is 0.47 mW/cm2 . The worst-case calculated exposure condition resulting from the AT&T facility is the power density divided by the Public MPE limit= 0.47593% of the Public MPE limit. All ground level areas are expected to have exposure conditions less than the calculated Public MPE due to the proposed AT&T facility. OTHER CARRIERS The following are examples of wireless carriers providing service to the local area: ESMR Cellular PCS 851-866 Mhz 869-894 Mhz >1800 Mhz Nextel Verizon Sprint, T-Mobile, CONTRIBUTION OF OTHER EXISTING CARRIERS TO RF EXPOSURE ENVIRONMENT Based on our information, an unknown carrier is currently collocated on the existing structure. Worst case parameters of similar facilities in the area, the maximum ERP from any sector of the existing unknown carrier antennas on the structure is less than or equal to 3000 watts with all channels activated. Therefore the worst-case downward ERP is 3000 / 100 = 30 watts from the existing facility. By use of the power density formula previously described, with input values of 30 watts downwards ERP, and a distance of 94.0 ft, the worst-case calculated power density at AT&T Site WA673 -6 - head height from the existing unknown carrier's facility to a six-foot person standing at ground level is 0.001222 mW/cm 2 . All of the existing antennas transmit and/or receive within the PCS, ESMR or Cellular frequency band. The Public MPE limit for all frequencies at worst case scenario for the purpose of this calculation is 0.567 mW/cm2 . The worst-case calculated exposure condition resulting from unknown carrier's facility is the power density divided by the Public MPE limit= 0.21552% of the Public MPE limit. All accessible ground level areas are expected to have exposure conditions less than the calculated Public MPE due to this existing facility. COLOCATED FACILITITES TOTAL MPE The predicted maximum worst-case RF exposure conditions resulting from all proposed and existing wireless facilities at all ground-level areas is the arithmetic sum of the contributions from each facility: 0.47593 + 0.21552 = 0.69145 % of the Public MPE limit allowed by FCC rules. This worst-case calculated exposure level is well below the 100% FCC limit. The actual exposure conditions are likely to be many times less than this worst-case value. FCC COMPLIANCE The general population/uncontrolled exposure near this facility, including persons at ground level, surrounding properties, inside and on existing structures will have RF exposure much lower than the "worst case" scenario, which is a small fraction of the MPE limit. Only, trained personnel will be allowed to access the AT&T antennas and equipment for maintenance operations. It shall be the responsibility of AT&T and/or its contractors to provide adequate occupational training making employees fully aware of the potential for RF exposure, and to exercise control over their exposure that is within their occupational/controlled limits. The FCC has determined that at sites where multiple wireless facilities are co-located, the responsibility for site-wide RF safety compliance is the shared responsibility of all licensees whose facilities produce exposure conditions greater than 5% of the applicable MPE exposure limit. Thus a new applicant is responsible for compliance (or submitting an environmental assessment) at a multiple-facility site only if the proposed facility, when AT&T Site WA673 -7 - considered alone, would produce exposure conditions in excess of 5% of the MPEs. Wireless facilities that produce less than 5% of the applicable MPE exposure limit at accessible locations are considered to be exempt from further study. As demonstrated in this report by worst-case exposure calculations, the proposed AT&T wireless facility will produce far less than 5% of the applicable exposure limit for public environments. Therefore, pursuant to the Commission's rules no further calculations, measurements or other RF studies are required, and the proposed AT&T facility is presumed to be in compliance with the FCC's RF exposure rules. Because the proposed AT&T wireless facility is in compliance with federal rules, it is also in compliance with local regulations concerning RF exposure. The following is the complete text of 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(iv): "No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, or modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission's regulations concerning such emissions." CONCLUSIONS Based on these calculations, the proposed WCF will comply with current FCC and local rules and guidelines regarding human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields. This conclusion is based solely on the comparison of predicted RF conditions in specific areas with the corresponding safe exposure limits set forth in the FCC rules. The FCC exposure limits are based on recommendations by federal and private entities with the appropriate expertise in human safety issues. To avoid any misunderstanding, I hereby state that, to the best of my knowledge, belief and professional judgment, this report represents an accurate appraisal of exposure to RF EM fields based upon careful evaluation to the extent reasonably possible. Respectfully Submitted For the Firm, Yan Wang, PE Morrison Hershfield Corp. #44138 AT&T Site WA673 4/27/11 CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 C:ltv oi H.enton Printed: 04-28-201 l Payment Made: Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA11-024 Receipt Number: Total Payment: 04128/2011 04:33 PM 3,090.00 Payee: GoodmanNetworks Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 3080 503.000000.004.322 Technology Fee 5009 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.000000.007.345 Environmental Review Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 94852 3,090.00 Account Balances Amount 90.00 2,000.00 1,000.00 Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000000.020.345 Park Mitigation Fee 3080 503.000000.004.322 Technology Fee 5006 000.000000.007.345 Annexation Fees 5007 000.000000.011.345 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.000000.007.345 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 ooo.000000.007.345 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.000000.007.345 Environmental Review 5011 000.000000.007.345 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.000000.007.345 Final Plat 5013 000.000000.007.345 PUD 5014 ooo.000000.007.345 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.000000.007.345 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.000000.007.345 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.000000.007.345 Rezone 5018 000.000000.007.345 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.000000.007.345 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.000000.007.345 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.000000.007.345 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 5022 000.000000.007.345 Variance Fees 5024 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.000000.007.345 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.000000.002.341 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.000000.007.341 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 DO NOT USE -USE 3954 5998 000.000000.000.231 Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 APR 2 8 1un R1101518