Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Report 1
PARTIES OF RECORD RHA GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LUA11-054, SA -A, LC Guy Peckham Joel Ing Bumgardner Architects Shelter Resources, Inc. Renton Housing Authority 2111 Third Avenue 2223 112th Avenue NE ste: PO Box 2316 Seattle, WA 98121 #102 Renton, WA 98056 tel: (206) 223-1361 Bellevue, WA 98004 tel: (425) 226-1850 eml: guyp@bumgardner.biz tel: (425) 454-8205 (owner) (contact) (applicant) Updated: 06/30/11 (Page 1 of 1) as o CD E Z O +� U a J] D n Zi a Y m 0 � p p p ati � Com,. f!1 � mSa 0 # o I LL W fi E c C cc o z as i I �3 A(a4VpOWaa�0 W� G m M � .a _ A J2 t c Zi _... _ N O04 C3 3 f ..�A�ce" � o o O 1 a 0 t� C= 3NId p .'^.& a f ITH ELEVATION -7• z(o • // City of Renton Planning Division JUL B 7 2011 RECE ED IVIO, r m z z 0 0 v 9 m z c m z m m_ 0 I A �v �m IV Iwo - up i 1co D �'z=.� Z EG I EQ m S 1 o �0 m__.� I r o N w w �II ren! m ry, I CA) r �w �'-m 1 k A I� ft1 C rP 9-3518" 9'-0118" 8 -21� O oIr m-0 �y S I G7 mo �I 28' - 7 5118" BLDG MT � (30'-0" MAX BLDG HT) Q c �D � 0 4WIVOM 'OW voo t�S r p !� �- Fol 11., #u •; b �ij.}I f-Rkntorl r r Planning Divisi 1� r I� Jill_ 9.7 2911 ', Gp3CC� GD i . 4 A ' � ✓� �' CAP I . Plav Area_ �''": f LOP 0 Ch �v J 00 W10 � w � w o (el -4°D n�i r w + m Cf 9--3518" 9'-0118" 8'-2" m , �, cQ (D 0 Use sere xve &40 � OQ7 AIIQ L - AZ wiA .Wf0A JWWCA { �I I� r � N aha (LI p l^? d �I 1 0� � m.._..__._ �.__.._.. C a it a e o 1.1 k W,U i Z 11 w z w. zl FUZ- 0 0 0 8 ° ZI Z �j Z O QI w J LU 1 I • I h LUW �0 �0 N1 D W 0 I E E IE I I I lE z 0 1= w UJ' C C n L�1 ro k, �i ITH ELEVATION -7- Z& • 11 C � cr c c4 _ oir,,OUD,' aKSNCD aC� ICN %0% VAA'JaDbwd �iN ar AV PSI M I h L W N �_ J r S3WOHNMOI QOOMNN� a e C ;0041-V �FrbH uOWed �16U15no4 Lu&uwvlde j 9^ ~ ' CC ! n .r a oir,,OUD,' aKSNCD aC� ICN W N �_ a e C IpI W9AA ' ice/ os ua�'u n .r a A WSJ OU r i lit r �� -7- 11 J l I f Y OAV .trA a� ` O O 4 1 1 6 1 95086 VWWWey'3N anuG^V P00muu2l9[t{ I NULL -)t IA1�IVUJ f7V� .LVIV 0 1z 0 � o u7 c s J w — [V S3WOHNMOI OOOMNN310 M ^iEll_ ■ ; U Y W 1 �� eZ .2 t Aw%v V &WWH u0>WU X4 C1MC04 1vwO BYO% 5 � f 1 pp i Yy df� t� ii y@ 1B� l lE y I I — y I I I I I NULL -)t IA1�IVUJ f7V� .LVIV 0 1z 0 M jfea M ^iEll_ ■ Y W 1 eZ .2 5 � f Jill �ytl pp i Yy df� t� ii y@ 1B� l lE y I I — y I I I I I i A 0 a ¢YY p W W ^ o' r„ u6pap auij6upds NOIlonaiSNO5kd6_ 1.ON 4.0 e'! il ff s �� ��$ls a I�•e� .a 91 q�lbp� I Nil CC o 15 g my � a�! e.� AG R % � v4 i Ifi $$ �u 7p Vogl$r 1 t d x x x r x tl 8 = _ cl _ elf a@af $ a r1 mil 94 Jig'16 I q� esashe lag� � =lm, B fill S! a P QF ����h ■58E� �� U It �1w 1 11111hex �Re�x V �e §� 90111_ s �e V1 411 fig � i:a .Tl #I .r a =® 95086 VM'uoluay'3N onuanV Poanuua�O trl t F cn S3NOHNMOI000MNN3]J �� m 9 € q� a " Go Z /1fjWln"V NwsnoH Ublubd iq buisnby Suawaaejday a NOIlonaiSNO5kd6_ 1.ON 4.0 e'! il ff s �� ��$ls a I�•e� .a 91 q�lbp� I Nil CC o 15 g my � a�! e.� AG R % � v4 i Ifi $$ �u 7p Vogl$r 1 t d x x x r x tl 8 = _ cl _ elf a@af $ a r1 mil 94 Jig'16 I q� esashe lag� � =lm, B fill S! a P QF ����h ■58E� �� U It �1w 1 11111hex �Re�x V �e §� 90111_ s �e V1 411 fig � i:a .Tl #I .r s u&ispaul;6uijds C1t U ..l l I�nL I I 1/1/1 l In 1. ^Y I q � Kill �b� sex 1A a iN Mi H �� �6* pg � aieb y �b�p � •F.a' � n � 7n� � ,€■a1ypep' � �ly� � ��@ys m � � �alg ��y}@ gXy�� (,) a O LD z 08 } I — .— — — — — — X IN MIS VM 'uo1uay 3ry anuany puO N JUG19 v l t S3AOHNMOI ❑OOMNN319 W i � U] Q Lu ! QT d Ap o4ft BulanoH uoluaa iol Bmnoy luawaosldaa yy i !4 C1t U ..l l I�nL I I 1/1/1 l In 1. ^Y I q � Kill �b� sex 1A a iN Mi H �� �6* pg � aieb y �b�p � •F.a' � n � 7n� � ,€■a1ypep' � �ly� � ��@ys m � � �alg ��y}@ gXy�� (,) a O LD z 08 } I — .— — — — — — X IN u61sa1) a7 1 5uuds M06 Vnh'uoluaU'3N anuanV POuMuua[O �vH SEIWOHNMOl OOOMNNI�9 Apo41"V BwsnoH uulu@tj fol Bui5no41uawa]elday C14 ED c� I � I1 co 2 ?Zoa cn U < CL 3 CL W. +vol�.�n�islvo��ao� ioN cc o Z�"_ e --s- } if if •I� - I � I1 c 0 C 4" .0 C u% CC Q N G' Cob m V " a 9SW6 VM'uoluay 3N snuany pooMuuai' 1911 '"mo' _'""' ' q SIWOHNMOl 000MNN319 uBlsap aw�6uuds `+, -'i� AWoyyp &nsnoH uoluay ion 6usnou wawaoeidaa 0 z V ?a r jTiNI i 21 s Ix a • a1t� i i` j m 1 J� l3 Q �4 y9 tjJ i i I d/ z _ 1 I .. Sfa 1'JK w�S :--.......- I a C 'LI)cc tiJ . R 0 N Q C M I lei ?� II R.ft d ,-L� C Ii2` j3� I a ![Ella � ■tll] ON3 L� 00 N~ �z I 101K - Am lie p, 1 L1'8/tLi , Yi5 w � ' ± 1 I b i I I ,..t I I T i I I r LU Y FF} I 0 � Ml c f / Ot • Am w MI AL1 • Y15 w I --4 _ µ I i 1 I II I i I I f IiSK AM Ad 0II10111 - Va w 1 I 1 I. I I II f0iit - n7u ow 0o I I - I j I I I I I 1 I 1 - I �1 I i i _ 111 �> I, , •.�•. •.. �I 121 d a L� 00 N~ �z I o� bbii �f b i 1 L Ij� ,..t � �IF LU Y 0 � c a L� 00 N~ �z bbii �f b i 1 L Ij� ,..t � �IF c All € Qii ,. fb rye .s gg 8 + � •'r. � �rp � r � R4 tl$a �x ��� � a�R z Giitr ry 8e� 8 it 183 ~r kr 41 xy rip; 16 dg LD Haiti IWO it tow N n ,I3 sG y se r rx w bAx rif 1,a Rgtl le it M^ 7------ ,;ji.,h'' �r8 t y a aa .11 •O T 95086 YM 'uOW4 '3N anuaAV popnwu010 L V I I00 f CN I 1 Iia S]WOHNMOl DOOMNN]IO i, ^� a � r O • � Ap+oy,ny 6u'snoH uo,uad ioi 6uisnoy Iuau,a3aidq � iif��R'-r' fJJr ti .i .11 •O T 1 Iia O • � O "� � iif��R'-r' fJJr ti .i �bi'bA p I r� wrYr... raw. ww 1 Iia s ti .i ' ct � 3 , 1+I+ill+illll++lltjlt11+11111R111�i � t1�11111I}lflll�Il�ff}kHll�llElllll I a �, i r� wrYr... raw. ww L r SLt'a V,► 99 95096 VM'uo1uaa '3N anuaeV pooMuual� Lb I 1 S3WOHNMOi GOOMNN31O A{uoy�nV 6ulsnoy uo}uaa joi 6ulsno4 O e o ,...a c— N C= �uawa�oldaN � a cc CM O O.c m c c -Z) .Z% V a 99 R7,- ;I c 1 n cr u y ttI� h} i� I. a i 044 I � l �I a f II U'i o ` u 4 .I na cae.c ��aiere �,,,�e �..b: � v wn.e..�.rn�.ww.�i w�...�o rnvwsei�a•ws wi,5a 95096 VM'uo1uaa '3N anuaeV pooMuual� Lb I 1 S3WOHNMOi GOOMNN31O A{uoy�nV 6ulsnoy uo}uaa joi 6ulsno4 1' } �. _ � � — o 1 ,eH 9°'8,,12 W5 CD c— N C= �uawa�oldaN -- -- -- O. R7,- ;I c 1 n cr u y ttI� h} i� I. a i 044 I � l �I a f II U'i o ` u 4 .I na cae.c ��aiere �,,,�e �..b: � v wn.e..�.rn�.ww.�i w�...�o rnvwsei�a•ws wi,5a C 95086 VM 'uo{uaa AN anuanV pooMuual2J L Y l l 0 C o m 0to r- C7 S3VYOHNMOl 0OOMNN310 IX 0 4 ' CG C a `' c MuoylnV BwsnoH uoluaV,ai $wsnay juawa:ioldab Va oil - 'va�op✓ -- � Y m U 1 ,u 0 le ;� t 95086 VM 'uo{uaa AN anuanV pooMuual2J L Y l l rCN o m 0to r- C7 S3VYOHNMOl 0OOMNN310 1# a MuoylnV BwsnoH uoluaV,ai $wsnay juawa:ioldab oil - 'va�op✓ -- � Y m U 1 ,u 0 le ;� t a I C7 l J o I ntl SC6YC lI0LplA IvvlMw'9���W'�:M1'�uy9�vHm�u.pi�hwr;R,ruuyyaJ Vo�'�v�IFiYKd 2RCYL11�oY+60Gt11�3 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Renton Housing Authority Attn. Mark Gropper, Executive Director 2900 Northeast 10th Street Renton, WA 98056 Grantor(s): Grantee(s): Abbreviated Legal Description: . Renton (',1ty o� p�vis�at� CONFORMED COPY 20120216000158 RENTON HOUSING COV 55.00 PAGE -001 OF 004 02/16/2012 07:49 AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESTRICTIVE COVENANT Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number(s): k 6r Housing Authority of the City of Renton City of Renton Lots 9 & 10, Block 42, Volume 57 of Plats, Page 92-98, records of King County, Washington Full legal description is located on pages 1-2. 722780-1375-00 and 722780-1380-03 This Afforda§le Housing Restrictive Covenant Agreement ("Covenant") is made and entered into this t;Ty day of Mct , 2012, by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton ("Owner"). RECITALS WHEREAS, the Owner is the fee title owner of certain real property located in Renton, King County, Washington, and legally described as follows: Parcel A: LOT 9, BLOCK 42, CORRECTED PLAT OF RENTON HIGHLAND NO. 2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 57 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 92 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel B: LOT 10, BLOCK 42, CORRECTED PLAT OF RENTON HIGHLANDS NO. 2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 57 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 92 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 425804.1 1 35 8187 10002 (hereinafter referred to as "Property"); and WHEREAS, Owner is building 8 -units of affordable housing on the Property referred to generally as the Glenwood Townhomes Project. This project is being funded in part by funds received from King County through the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG), and is subject to the terms and conditions of a contract between the Owner and King County under King County Contract No. D40906D1E (the "Contract"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Contract, the Owner has agreed to operate the Glennwood Townhomes Project in full compliance with the housing operations and management activities described in Exhibit II to the Contract for a period of fifty (50) years and terminating on December 31, 2062, at 12:00 noon (the "Affordability Period"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Renton Municipal Code (RMC) 4-1-210C, entitled Rental Housing Incentive, the Owner has applied to the City for a waiver of one hundred percent (100%) of certain development and mitigation fees applicable to rental housing projects, including (1) building permit fees, (2) building permit plan review fees, (3) water, surface water, and wastewater system development charges, (4) Public Works plan review and inspection fees; and (5) fire, transportation, and parks impact mitigation fees (the "Development and Mitigation Fees"); and WHEREAS, the conditions of the Contract between the Owner and King County relating to the housing operations and management activities described in Exhibit II to the Contract also satisfy RMC 4-1-210C relating to the waiver of Development and Mitigation Fees; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RMC 4-1-210C the City has approved of a waiver of one hundred percent (100%) of the Development and Mitigation Fees, provided that the Owner records restrictive covenants that satisfy the requirements of RMC 4-1-210C; and WHEREAS, the Owner in fulfillment of that obligation desires to place certain restrictions on the use of the Property; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby covenanted as follows: RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS 1. Restrictive Covenants. During the Affordability Period, the Owner covenants as follows: A. The proposed construction project is for eight (8) new multi -family rental housing units in the RM -F or R-14 zone within the Center Village zone. B. At least fifty percent (50%) of the units will be set aside as affordable housing. 42580411358187 10002 -2- i. Three of the residential units on the Property shall be rented to tenants with gross annual household incomes at the time of initial occupancy no higher than thirty percent (30%) of median income of the median income in King County, Washington adjusted for family size as estimated from time to time by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD"). In addition, five of the residential units in the Property shall be rented to tenants with gross annual household incomes at the time of initial occupancy no higher than fifty percent (50%) of median income of the median income in King County, Washington adjusted for family size as estimated from time to time by HUD. If HUD ceases to provide such estimates of median income, then median income shall mean such comparable figure for King County, Washington published or reported by a federal, state, or local agency as the City shall select. ii. Pursuant to RMC 4-1-210C(2), "affordable housing" means residential housing that is rented by a low-income household whose monthly housing costs, including rent and utilities other than telephone, do not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the household's monthly income. "Low-income household" means a single person, family, or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is at or below sixty percent (60%) of the median income. Rents charged to tenants of the target population shall satisfy the definition of "affordable housing." iii. The Owner shall keep any records and make any reports relating to compliance with this Covenant that the City may reasonably require. 2. Cancellation or Modification. Consistent with RCW 4-1-120(C)(7), in the event the Owner fails to comply with the terms of this Covenant, all Development and Mitigation Fees waived by the City pursuant to Section 4-1-210C of the Renton Municipal Code must be paid with interest. After the Covenant is recorded, the Project may not be modified to owner -occupied "For Sale" housing without the advance approval of the City Council. 3. Covenant Running with the Land. This Covenant shall be appurtenant to and run with the Property described herein and shall be binding on the Owner's successors and assigns, heirs, grantees, or lessees of the Property during the Affordability Period, beginning on the date of initial residential occupancy after construction of the Glennwood Townhomes as contemplated by the Contract. 4. Enforcement and Waiver. The City is a beneficiary of this Covenant and as such, the City may after thirty days notice to the Owner, and if applicable, its successors and assigns, heirs, grantees, or lessees of the Property, enforce this Covenant by an action at law or in equity. Any failure of the City to enforce this Covenant shall not be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. Invalidation of any one of the conditions of this Covenant by 425804.1 1 358187 10002 -3- judgment or court order shall in no way affect any other conditions which remain in full force and effect. 5. Recording. This Covenant shall be recorded with the King County Office of Records and Elections following its signature. IN WITNESS WfIEREOF, the Housing Authority of the City of Renton has executed this Covenant as of the date set forth below. DECLARANT Housing Authority of the City of Renton, a Washingt munici I corporation By-_ Marl G ppe Executive Director Dated: C. 12 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Mark R. Gropper is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it as the Executive Director of the Housing Authority of the City of Renton to be the free and voluntary act of such entity for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ¢G z ��'f'Cl� DATED: GZ -- � � a2 `� •V� Q 190 0 T.4R�, C NAME: �-A UBLI Z § (Print ) �A�- 7;°.)-�3• Notary Public in and for the State of Washington ..... •• WASO j��i Commission Expires: _ _ d/_- 425804.1135818710002 -4- lb AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Renton Housing Authority Attn. Mark Gropper, Executive Director 2900 Northeast 10th Street Renton, WA 98056 Grantor(s): Grantee(s): Abbreviated Legal Description: CONFORMED COPY 20120216000158 RENTON HOUSING COY 65.00 PAGE -001 OF 004 02/16/2012 07:48 AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESTRICTIVE COVENANT Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number(s): Fent°� °k is�fl� FEB 2� 1pil Housing Authority of the City of Renton City of Renton Lots 9 & 10, Block 42, Volume 57 of Plats, Page 92-98, records of King County, Washington Full legal description is located on pages 1-2. 722780-1375-00 and 722780-1380-03 This Afforda§le Housing Restrictive Covenant Agreement ("Covenant") is made and entered into this _� day of 17eMer , 2012, by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton ("Owner"). 11 RECITALS WHEREAS, the Owner is the fee title owner of certain real property located in Renton, King County, Washington, and legally described as follows: Parcel A: LOT 9, BLOCK 42, CORRECTED PLAT OF RENTON HIGHLAND NO. 2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 57 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 92 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel B: LOT 10, BLOCK 42, CORRECTED PLAT OF RENTON HIGHLANDS NO. 2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 57 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 92 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 425804.1 1 358187 10002 -1- r (hereinafter referred to as "Property");. and WHEREAS, Owner is building 8 -units of affordable housing on the Property referred to generally as the Glennwood Townhomes Project. This project is being funded in part by funds received from King County through the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG), and is subject to the terms and conditions of a contract between the Owner and King County under King County Contract No. D40906DIE (the "Contract"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Contract, the Owner has agreed to operate the Glennwood Townhomes Project in full compliance with the housing operations and management activities described in Exhibit II to the Contract for a period of fifty (50) years and terminating on December 31, 2062, at 12:00 noon (the "Affordability Period"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Renton Municipal Code (RMC) 4-1-210C, entitled Rental Housing Incentive, the Owner has applied to the City for a waiver of one hundred percent (100%) of certain development and mitigation fees applicable to rental housing projects, including (1) building permit fees, (2) building permit plan review fees, (3) water, surface water, and wastewater system development charges, (4) Public Works plan review and inspection fees; and (5) fire, transportation, and parks impact mitigation fees (the "Development and Mitigation Fees"); and WHEREAS, the conditions of the Contract between the Owner and King County relating to the housing operations and management activities described in Exhibit II to the Contract also satisfy RMC 4-1-210C relating to the waiver of Development and Mitigation Fees; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RMC 4-1-210C the City has approved of a waiver of one hundred percent (100%) of the Development and Mitigation Fees, provided that the Owner records restrictive covenants that satisfy the requirements of RMC 4-1-210C; and WHEREAS, the Owner in fulfillment of that obligation desires to place certain restrictions on the use of the Property; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby covenanted as follows: RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS 1. Restrictive Covenants. During the Affordability Period, the Owner covenants as follows: A. The proposed construction project is for eight (8) new multi -family rental housing units in the RM -F or R-14 zone within the Center Village zone. B. At least fifty percent (50%) of the units will be set aside as affordable housing. 425804.1 1358187 `0002 -2- i. Three of the residential units on the Property shall be rented to tenants with gross annual household incomes at the time of initial occupancy no higher than thirty percent (30%) of median income of the median income in King County, Washington adjusted for family size as estimated from time to time by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD"). In addition, five of the residential units in the Property shall be rented to tenants with gross annual household incomes at the time of initial occupancy no higher than fifty percent (50%) of median income of the median income in King - County, Washington adjusted for family size as estimated from time to time by HUD. If HUD ceases to provide such estimates of median income, then median income shall mean such comparable figure for King County, Washington published or reported by a federal, state, or local agency as the City shall select. ii. Pursuant to RMC 4-1-210C(2), "affordable housing" means residential housing that is rented by a low-income household whose monthly housing costs, including rent and utilities other than telephone, do not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the household's monthly income. "Low-income household" means a single person, family, or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is at or below sixty percent (60%) of the median income. Rents charged to tenants of the target population shall satisfy the definition of "affordable housing." iii, The Owner shall keep any records and make any reports relating to compliance with this Covenant that the City may reasonably require. 2. Cancellation or Modification. Consistent with RCW 4-1-120(C)(7), in the event the Owner fails to comply with the terms of this Covenant, all Development and Mitigation Fees waived by the City pursuant to Section 4-1-210C of the Renton Municipal Code must be paid with interest. After the Covenant is recorded, the Project may not be modified to owner -occupied "For Sale" housing without the advance approval of the City Council. 3. Covenant Running with the Land. This Covenant shall be appurtenant to and run with the Property described herein and shall be binding on the Owner's successors and assigns, heirs, grantees, or lessees of the Property during the Affordability Period, beginning on the date of initial residential occupancy after construction of the Glennwood Townhomes as contemplated by the Contract. 4. Enforcement and Waiver. The City is a beneficiary of this Covenant and as such, the City may after thirty days notice to the Owner, and if applicable, its successors and assigns, heirs, grantees, or lessees of the Property, enforce this Covenant by an action at law or in equity. Any failure of the City to enforce this Covenant shall not be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. Invalidation of any one of the conditions of this Covenant by 425804.1 1 358187 10002 -3- judgment or court order shall in no way affect any other conditions which remain in full force and effect. S. Recording. This Covenant shall be recorded with the King County Office of Records and Elections following its signature. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Housing Authority of the City of Renton has executed this Covenant as of the date set forth below. DECLARANT Housing Authority of the City of Renton, a Washingo munici 1 corporation By. Mar6. G ppe Executive Director Dated: I. 6'. 12 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Mark R. Gropper is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it as the Executive Director of the Housing Authority of the City of Renton to be the free and voluntary act of such entity for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED: -Z - ( — z 0/ vZ cv�rci�, rt - NAME: & rkarrL �. 2ti r ko (Print Name) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington .Commission Expires: _ LO/ - 06- 425804. ] 1358187 10002 -4- January 23, 2012 Renton City Council Minutes Page 21 Planning &Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Prince presented a report Committee recommending approval of a 1009 waiver of the development and mitigation CED: Glennwood Townhomes fees as provided for in RMC 4-1-210.C. for the Renton Housing Authority's Fee Waiver Request, Renton Glennwood Townhomes, an 8 -unit affordable housing development in the Housing Authority Sunset Area, and directs staff to establish and record a restrictive covenant regarding the affordable housing unit set aside prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the project. 8 Can MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. RESOLUTIONS & The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: ORDINANCES RESOLUTION #4127 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: Transfer of interlocal agreement with King County regarding the transfer of drainage Drainage Facilities in May facilities. MOVED BY ZWICKER, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE Creek Park Area, King County RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. RESOLUTION #4128 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Finance: Regional Aerial interlocal agreement entitled "2012 Regional Aerial Mapping Funding Mapping Funding Agreement, Agreement." MOVED BY TAYLOR, SECONDED BY ZWICKER, COUNCIL ADOPT King County THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for first reading and referred to the 2/6/2012 Council meeting for second and final reading: Attorney: Written Statement An ordinance was read amending Section 10-5-7 of Chapter 5, Impoundment in Lieu of Post Impoundment and Redemption of Vehicles, of Title X (Traffic), of City Code, by adding a new Hearing Appearance, Code subsection 10-5-7.E. allowing a written statement by the owner of the motor Amendment vehicle in lieu of an appearance at a post impoundment hearing. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY ZWICKER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 2/6/2012. CARRIED. Attorney: Strengthen Penal An ordinance was read amending Chapter 18, Penal Code, of Title V1 (Police Code, Code Amendment Regulations), of City Code, clarifying and strengthening the penal code by revising Sections 6-18-5, Dangerous Weapons; Evidence, 6-18-11, Breach of the Public Peace, 6-18-19, Making or Having Auto Theft Tools, and 6-18-20, Park Rules and Regulations Violations; and permitting offenses to be charged and plead guilty to under the RMC by adding seven new sections, "Adjournment in Contemplation of Dismissal," "Criminal Accomplice," "Criminal Attempt," Criminal Coercion," "Criminal Conspiracy," "Criminal Defense of insanity," and "Criminal Solicitation." MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY ZWICKER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 2/612012. CARRIED. Attorney: Correcting An ordinance was read amending Sections 6-1-1 and 6-1-3 of Title VI (Police References to RMC 1-3, Code Regulations) and Section 8-1-6 of Chapter 1, Garbage, of Title VIII (Health and Amendment Sanitation), of City Code, correcting the references to the revised Chapter 1-3 RMC. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY ZWICKER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL. READING ON 2/6/2012. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY ZWICKER, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL REFER THE Citizen Comment: Hanson - CORRESPONDENCE FROM JIM HANSON REGARDING CITY ALLEY ACCESS Alley Access Requirements REQUIREMENTS TO THE ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED. PLANNING&:'DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE :. :'COMMITTEE F7EP.QkT. ��; --- - January. -2,3 2012 December 12, 2011 Renton City Council Minutes Page 382 District Improvements, King move it to Renton. Mr. Meeks explained that the types of repairs he conducts County would not allow him to meet the proposed 72 -hour parking time limit because he sometimes has to wait several months for vehicle parts to arrive. He urged Transportation: S Lake Council to make sure the legislation that is adopted is fair and just for all Washington Roadway & persons involved, including future small business owners. CONSENT AGENDA Items listed on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows TIB Grant the listing. Council: Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 12/5/2011. Council concur. 12/5/2011 and grant two drainage easements to the Washington State Department of City Clerk: 2011 General City Clerk reported the 2011 General Election results from King County Election Results Elections, as follows: Mayor Position - Denis Law (13,748 - elected); Council Position No. 3 - Marcie Palmer (13,205 - elected); Council Position No. 4 - Greg Taylor (11,149 - elected), Sarah Sanoy-Wright (4,424); Council Position No. 5 - Ed Prince (8,335 - elected), Robin H. Jones (7,652); Council position No. 7 - Don Persson (10,238 - elected), Phyllis Forister (5,635). Information. CED: 2012 State Legislative Community and Economic Development Department recommended approval Agenda & Statement of Policy of the 2012 State Legislative Agenda and Statement of Polity Positions, Positions including transportation solutions, fiscal stability, economic development/infrastructure funding, public safety and strengthening the aerospace industry, which serve as guidance for City staff during the State legislative session. Council concur. CED: Glennwood Townhomes Community and Economic Development Department recommended approval Fee Waiver Request, Renton to waive all development and mitigation fees for the Renton Housing Housing Authority Authority's Glennwood Townhomes, an 8 -unit four-bedroom affordable housing development project in -the Sunset Area, and requested approval to. record the related affordable housing set aside restrictive covenant. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. CED: Renton Avenue Business Community and Economic Development Department recommended approval District Improvements, King of a second interagency agreement in the amount of $727,000 with King County County.,for the Renton Avenue Business District Improvements project in the West Hill/Skyway area, funded by State and Federal grants. Council concur. Transportation: S Lake Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of a Fuel Tax Washington Roadway & Distribution Agreement to accept $1,755,500 from the Washington State Intersection Improvements, Transportation Improvement Board (requiring 20% local match) for the S. Lake TIB Grant Washington Roadway and Intersection Improvements project. Council concur. Utility: Thunder Hills Creek Utility Systems Division requested approval to waive the reimbursement value Drainage Easements, WSDOT and grant two drainage easements to the Washington State Department of Transportation for the right to construct, operate, monitor, and maintain _ _ _„ •.____, habitat improvements as part of the Thunder Hills Creek Mitigation Fish Barrier Retrofit project, as required mitigation for the impacts associated with the replacement of the failed Thunder Hills Creek culvert under 1-405. Council concur. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Fee Waiver Request — Glennwood Townhomes Meeting: Regular Council - 12 Dec 2011 Exhibits: Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Issue Paper Community and Economic Development Staff Contact: Rocale Timmons, x7219 Recommended Action: Refer to Planning and Development Committee Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ 0 Transfer Amendment: $ 0 Amount Budgeted: $ 0 Revenue Generated: $ 0 Total Project Budget: $ 0 City Share Total Project: $ 0 SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Renton Housing Authority (RHA) has requested a waiver of the development and mitigation fees for the Glennwood Townhomes, an 8 -unit four-bedroom affordable housing development project in the Sunset Area. The project is located a half -block northwest of Sunset Terrace and is RHA's first replacement housing project for the planned Sunset Terrace redevelopment. The "Waived Fees - Rental Housing Incentive," RMC 4-1-210C, was adopted in August, 2011, in order to encourage new multi- family rental housing in the Sunset Area. As provided for in RMC 4-1-2100, RHA has requested that the following fees be waived for the Glennwood Townhomes project: building permits fees; building permit plan review fees; water, surface water and wastewater system development charges; public works plan review and inspection fees; and fire, transportation and parks impact mitigation fees. The Glennwood Townhomes project meets the parameters of RMC 4-1-210C. Since 100% of the units will be set aside as rental housing for households at or below 60% of the median income, the project is eligible for a 100% fee waiver of the above development and mitigation fees. Per RMC 4-1-210C.6, RHA is required to record and execute a restrictive covenant regarding the affordable housing unit set aside after the Council approves the fee waiver and before the project is issued a building permit, unless otherwise approved by the Council. Since the Council's action on the fee waiver request will likely occur after the building permit is issued for the project, staff recommends that the Council allow RHA to establish and record the restrictive covenant prior to. the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the Glennwood Townhomes. The Glennwood Townhomes fee waiver will assist RHA in providing new affordable rental housing, encourage other capital investment in the area, and support the City's ongoing redevelopment efforts in the Sunset Area. The Glennwood Townhomes fee waiver supports the City's vision as the "Center of Opportunity in the Puget Sound region where businesses and families thrive", several 2011- 2016 Business Plan Goals and the Sunset Area Community Investment Strategy. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve a 100% waiver of the development and mitigation fees for the Renton Housing Authority's Glennwood Townhomes, and direct staff to establish and record a restrictive covenant regarding the affordable housing unit set aside prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the project. DEPARTMENT +p or�O� AND ECONOMf DATE: November 28, 2011 TO: Don Persson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Denis Law, Mayor FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator (x 6592) STAFF CONTACT: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner (0219) SUBJECT: Request for Fee Waiver — Glennwood Townhomes 1.55UE: Should the City waive certain development and mitigation fees for the Renton Housing Authority's Glennwood Townhomes? RECOMMENDATION: Approve a 100% waiver of the development and mitigation fees as provided for in RMC 4-1-210C for the Renton Housing Authority's Glennwood Townhomes, a 8 -unit affordable housing development in the Sunset Area, and direct staff to establish and record a restrictive covenant regarding the affordable housing unit set aside prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the project. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The Renton Housing Authority (RHA) has requested a waiver of the development and mitigation fees for the Glennwood Townhomes, a 8 -unit four-bedroom affordable housing development project in the Sunset Area. (Exhibit 1). The project is located a half -block northwest of Sunset Terrace and is RHA's first replacement housing project for the planned Sunset Terrace redevelopment. The Glennwood Townhomes is one of many community enhancements envisioned by the City of Renton's Sunset Area Community Investment Strategy which was adopted by the Council in fall 2009. The project has received site plan approval for construction at 1139 and 1147 Glennwood Ave NE and is scheduled to start construction shortly. RHA has made a commitment to use all eight units as affordable housing for households at or below 60% of median income (i.e.,- five of the units will be set aside for households at or below 50% of the median income and three units will be set aside for households at or below 30% of the median income). The "Waived Fees - Rental Housing Incentive," RMC 4-1-201C, was adopted on August 1, 2011, in order to encourage new rental housing in the CV, RM -F, and R-14 zones within the Center Village Comprehensive Plan designation (Exhibit 3). The Sunset Area c:\users\msantosiohnson\appdata\local\mlcrosoft\windows\temporary intemet files\content.outlook\4.axe19ih\glennwood townhomes waiver issue paper.doc Don Persson, Council President Page 2 of 3 November 28, 2011 Community Investment Strategy directed staff to implement the recommendations and prioritization of projects therein as resources become available. The fee waiver is intended to provide an incentive for redevelopment in the Sunset Area and encourage new multi -family rental housing. As provided for in RMC 4-1-210C, RHA has requested that the following fees be waived for the Glennwood Townhomes project: building permits fees; building permit plan review fees; water, surface water and wastewater system development charges; public works plan review and inspection fees; and fire, transportation and parks impact mitigation fees. The Glennwood Townhomes project meets the parameters of RMC 4-1-210C, "Waived Fees," in that it is a minimum of eight units, is new construction affordable rental housing, and is within the Residential -14 du/ac (R-14) zoning classification. (Exhibit 2) Since 100% of the units in the Glennwood Townhomes will be used as rental housing for households at or below 60% of the median income, the project is eligible for a 1009 fee waiver of the above development and mitigation fees. The projected total fees for the Glennwood Townhomes are $64,976. If waived, these fees would represent a savings of $8,122 per unit for the developer. (Exhibit 4) Per RMC 4-1-21005, a fee waiver request for an eligible project must be made prior to or by the administrative site plan review period unless otherwise approved by the Council. Since the Council's adoption of the fee waiver did not occur until after the administrative site plan review period for the Glennwood Townhomes, staff recommends that the Council accept the delayed request from RHA and approve the project for the eligible development and mitigation fees. Since RMA has already paid some of the applicable fees, staff will need to refund such fees if the Council approves the fee waiver as recommended. Per RMC 4-1-21006, RHA is required to execute and record a restrictive covenant regarding the affordable housing unit set aside after the Council approves the fee waiver and before the project is issued a building permit, unless otherwise approved by the Council. RNA held a groundbreaking for the Glennwood Townhomes on October 17, 2011, and plans to start construction on the project shortly. Since the Council's action on the fee waiver request will likely occur after the building permit is issued for the project, staff recommends that the Council allow RHA to establish and record the restrictive covenant prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the Glennwood Townhomes. CONCLUSION: RHA's Glennwood Townhomes, a new 8-unitaffordable rental housing development in the Sunset Area, meet the criteria for waiver of certain development and mitigation fees as provided for in RMC 4-1-210C. The fee waiver will assist RHA in providing new affordable rental housing, encourage other capital investment in the area, and support c:\users\msantosjohnson\appdata\loval♦microsof \windows\temporary internet files\contentoutlook\4axet9ih\glennwood townhomes waiver issue paper.doc Don Persson, Council President Page 3 of 3 November 28, 2011 the City's ongoing redevelopment efforts in the Sunset Area. The Glennwood Townhomes fee waiver supports the City's vision as the "Center of Opportunity in the Puget Sound region where businesses and families thrive", several 2011-2016 Business Plan Goals and the Sunset Area Community Investment Strategy. cc: C. E. "Chip" Vincent, Planning Director Neil Watts, Development Services Director Suzanne Dale Estey, Economic Development Director Mark Santos -Johnson, Senior Economic Development Specialist c:\users\msantosjohnson\appdata\local\microsoft\windows\temporary internet files\content.outlook\4azei4ih\giennwood townhomes waiver issue paper.doc January 23, 2012 Renton City Council Minutes Page 21 Planning & Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Prince presented a report Committee recommending approval of a 100% waiver of the development and mitigation CED: Giennwood Townhomes fees as provided for in RMC 4-1-210.0. for the Renton Housing Authority's Fee Waiver Request, Renton Glennwood Townhomes, an 8 -unit affordable housing development in the Housing Authority Sunset Area, and directs staff to establish and record a restrictive covenant U0� regarding the affordable housing unit set aside prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the project. MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. RESOLUTIONS & The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: ORDINANCES RESOLUTION #4127 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: Transfer of interlocal agreement with King County regarding the transfer of drainage Drainage Facilities in May facilities. MOVED BY ZWICKER, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE Creek Park Area, King County RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. RESOLUTION #4128 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Finance: Regional Aerial interlocal agreement entitled "2012 Regional Aerial Mapping Funding Mapping Funding Agreement, Agreement." MOVED BY TAYLOR, SECONDED BY ZWICKER, COUNCIL ADOPT King County THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for first reading and referred to the 2/6/2012 Council meeting for second and final reading: Attorney: Written Statement An ordinance was read amending Section 10-5-7 of Chapter 5, Impoundment in Lieu of Post Impoundment and Redemption of Vehicles, of Title X (Traffic), of City Code, by adding a new Hearing Appearance, Code subsection 10-5-7.E. allowing a written statement by the owner of the motor Amendment vehicle in lieu of an appearance at a post impoundment hearing. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY ZWICKER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 2/6/2012. CARRIED. Attorney: Strengthen Penal An ordinance was read amending Chapter 18, Penal Code, of Title VI (Police Code, Code Amendment Regulations), of City Code, clarifying and strengthening the penal code by revising Sections 6-18-5, Dangerous Weapons; Evidence, 6-18-11, Breach of the Public Peace, 6-18-19, Making or Having Auto Theft Tools, and 6-18-20, Park Rules and Regulations Violations; and permitting offenses to be charged and plead guilty to under the RMC by adding seven new sections, "Adjournment in Contemplation of Dismissal," "Criminal Accomplice," "Criminal Attempt," Criminal Coercion," "Criminal Conspiracy," "Criminal Defense of Insanity," and "Criminal Solicitation." MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY ZWICKER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 2/6/2012. CARRIED. Attorney: Correcting An ordinance was read amending Sections 6-1-1 and 6-1-3 of Title VI (Police References to RMC 1-3, Code Regulations) and Section 8-1-6 of Chapter 1, Garbage, of Title VIII (Health and Amendment Sanitation), of City Code, correcting the references to the revised Chapter 1-3 RMC. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY ZWICKER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 2/6/2012. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY ZWICKER, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL REFER THE Citizen Comment: Hanson - CORRESPONDENCE FROM JIM HANSON REGARDING CITY ALLEY ACCESS Alley Access Requirements REQUIREMENTS TO THE ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED. December 12, 2011 Renton City Council Minutes Page 382 move it to Renton. Mr. Meeks explained that the types of repairs he conducts would not allow him to meet the proposed 72 -hour parking time limit because he sometimes has to wait several months for vehicle parts to arrive. He urged Council to make sure the legislation that is adopted is fair and just for all persons involved, including future small business owners. CONSENT AGENDA Items listed on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council: Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 12/5/2011. Council concur. 12/5/2011 City Clerk: 2011 General City Clerk reported the 2011 General Election results from King County Election Results Elections, as follows: Mayor Position - Denis Law (13,748 - elected); Council Position No. 3 - Marcie Palmer (13,205 - elected); Council Position No. 4 - Greg Taylor (11,149 - elected), Sarah Sanoy-Wright (4,424); Council Position No. 5 - Ed Prince (8,335 - elected), Robin H. Jones (7,652); Council position No. 7 - Don Persson (10,238 - elected), Phyllis Forister (5,635). Information. CED: 2012 State Legislative Community and Economic Development Department recommended approval Agenda & Statement of Policy of the 2012 State Legislative Agenda and Statement of Policy Positions, Positions including transportation solutions, fiscal stability, economic development/infrastructure funding, public safety and strengthening the aerospace industry, which serve as guidance for City staff during the State legislative session. Council concur. CED: Glennwood Townhomes Community and Economic Development Department recommended approval Fee Waiver Request, Rentoi I to waive all development and mitigation fees for the Renton Housing Housing Authority Authority's Glennwood Townhomes, an 8 -unit four-bedroom affordable �v housing development project in the Sunset Area, and requested approval to record the related affordable housing set aside restrictive covenant. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. CED: Renton Avenue Business Community.and Economic Development Department recommended approval District improvements, King of a second interagency agreement in the amount of $727,000 with King County County for the Renton Avenue Business District Improvements project in the West Hill/Skyway area, funded by State and Federal grants. Council concur. Transportation: S Lake Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of a Fuel Tax Washington Roadway & Distribution Agreement to accept $1,755,500 from the Washington State Intersection Improvements, Transportation Improvement Board (requiring 20% local match) for the S. Lake TIB Grant Washington Roadway and Intersection Improvements project. Council concur. Utility: Thunder Hills Creek Utility Systems Division requested approval to waive the reimbursement value Drainage Easements, WSDOT and grant two drainage easements to the Washington State Department of Transportation for the right to construct, operate, monitor, and maintain habitat -improvements as part of the Thunder Hills Creek Mitigation Fish Barrier Retrofit project, as required mitigation for the impacts associated with the replacement of the failed Thunder Hills Creek culvert under 1-405. Council concur. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL -7,2, Subject/Title: Fee Waiver Request — Glennwood Townhomes Meeting: Regular Council - 12 Dec 2011 Exhibits: Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Issue Paper Community and Economic Development Staff Contact: Rocale Timmons, x7219 Recommended Action: Refer to Planning and Development Committee Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ 0 Transfer Amendment: $ 0 Amount Budgeted: $ 0 Revenue Generated: $ 0 Total Project Budget: $ 0 City Share Total Project: $ 0 SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Renton Housing Authority (RHA) has requested a waiver of the development and mitigation fees for the Glennwood Townhomes, an 8 -unit four-bedroom affordable housing development project in the Sunset Area. The project is located a half -block northwest of Sunset Terrace and is RNA's first replacement housing project for the planned Sunset Terrace redevelopment. The "Waived Fees - Rental Housing Incentive," RMC 4-1-210C, was adopted in August, 2011, in order to encourage new multi- family rental housing in the Sunset Area. As provided for in RMC 4-1-210C, RHA has requested that the following fees be waived for the Glennwood Townhomes project: building permits fees; building permit plan review fees; water, surface water and wastewater system development charges; public works plan review and inspection fees; and fire, transportation and parks impact mitigation fees. The Glennwood Townhomes project meets the parameters of RMC 4-1-210C. Since 100% of the units will be set aside as rental housing for households at or below 60% of the median income, the project is eligible for a 100% fee waiver of the above development and mitigation fees. Per RMC 4-1-210C.6, RHA is required to record and execute a restrictive covenant regarding the affordable housing unit set aside after the Council approves the fee waiver and before the project is issued a building permit, unless otherwise approved by the Council. Since the Council's action on the fee waiver request will likely occur after the building permit is issued for the project, staff recommends that the Council allow RHA to establish and record the restrictive covenant prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the Glennwood Townhomes. The Glennwood Townhomes fee waiver will assist RHA in providing new affordable rental housing, encourage other capital investment in the area, and support the City's ongoing redevelopment efforts in the Sunset Area. The Glennwood Townhomes fee waiver supports the City's vision as the "Center of Opportunity in the Puget Sound region where businesses and families thrive", several 2011- 2016 Business Plan Goals and the Sunset Area Community Investment Strateev. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve a 100% waiver of the development and mitigation fees for the Renton Housing Authority's Glennwood Townhomes, and direct staff to establish and record a restrictive covenant regarding the affordable housing unit set aside prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy'for the project. DEPARTMENT+ p 0�0� AND ECONOM! M E M O R A N D U M DATE: November 28, 2011 TO: Don Persson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Denis Law, Mayor FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator (x 6592) STAFF CONTACT: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner (0219) SUBJECT: Request for Fee Waiver — Glennwood Townhomes ISSUE: Should the City waive certain development and mitigation fees for the Renton Housing Authority's Glennwood Townhomes? I;ECOMMENDATION: Approve a 100% waiver of the development and mitigation fees as provided for in RMC 4-1-210C for the Renton Housing Authority's Glennwood Townhomes, a 8 -unit affordable housing development in the Sunset Area, and direct staff to establish and record a restrictive covenant regarding the affordable housing unit set aside prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the project. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The Renton Housing Authority (RHA) has requested a waiver of the development and mitigation fees for the Glennwood Townhomes, a 8 -unit four-bedroom affordable housing development project in the Sunset Area. (Exhibit 1). The project is located a half -block northwest of Sunset Terrace and is RNA's first replacement housing project for the planned Sunset Terrace redevelopment. The Glennwood Townhomes is one of many community enhancements envisioned by the City of Renton's Sunset Area Community Investment Strategy which was adopted by the Council in fall 2009. The project has received site plan approval for construction at 1139 and 1147 Glennwood Ave NE and is scheduled to start construction shortly. RHA has made a commitment to use all eight units as affordable housing for households at or below 60% of median income (i.e., five of the units will be set aside for households at or below 50% of the median income and three units will be set aside for households at or below 30% of the median income). The "Waived Fees - Rental Housing Incentive," RMC 4-1-201C, was adopted on August 1, 2011, in order to encourage new rental housing in the CV, RM -F, and R-14 zones within the Center Village Comprehensive Plan designation (Exhibit 3). The Sunset Area c:\users\msantosjohnson\appdata\local\microsoft\windows\temporary internet files\contentoutlook\4axel9ih\glennwood townhomes waiver issue paper.doc Don Persson, Council President Page 2 of 3 November 28, 2011 Community Investment Strategy directed staff to implement the recommendations and prioritization of projects therein as resources become available. The fee waiver is intended to provide an incentive for redevelopment in the Sunset Area and encourage new multi -family rental housing. As provided for in RMC 4-1-210C, RHA has requested that the following fees be waived for the Glennwood Townhomes project: building permits fees; building permit plan review fees; water, surface water and wastewater system development charges; public works plan review and inspection fees; and fire, transportation and parks impact mitigation fees. The Glennwood Townhomes project meets the parameters of RMC 4-1-210C, "Waived Fees," in that it is a minimum of eight units, is new construction affordable rental housing, and is within the Residential -14 du/ac (R-14) zoning classification. (Exhibit 2) Since 100% of the units in the Glennwood Townhomes will be used as rental housing for households at or below 60% of the median income, the project is eligible for a 100% fee waiver of the above development and mitigation fees. The projected total fees for the Glennwood Townhomes are $64,976. If waived, these fees would represent a savings of $8,122 per unit for the developer. (Exhibit 4) Per RMC 4-1-210CS, a fee waiver request for an eligible project must be made prior to or by the administrative site plan review period unless otherwise approved by the Council. Since the Council's adoption of the fee waiver did not occur until after the administrative site plan review period for the Glennwood Townhomes, staff recommends that the Council accept the delayed request from RHA and approve the project for the eligible development and mitigation fees. Since RMA has already paid some of the applicable fees, staff will need to refund such fees if the Council approves the fee waiver as recommended. Per RMC 4-1-21006, RHA is required to execute and record a restrictive covenant regarding the affordable housing unit set aside after the Council approves the fee waiver and before the project is issued a building permit, unless otherwise approved by the Council. RHA held a groundbreaking for the Glennwood Townhomes on October 17, 2011, and plans to start construction on the project shortly. Since the Council's action on the fee waiver request will likely occur after the building permit is issued for the project, staff recommends that the Council allow RNA to establish and record the restrictive covenant prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the Glennwood Townhomes. CONCLUSION: RHA's Glennwood Townhomes, a new 8-unitaffordable rental housing development in the Sunset Area, meet the criteria for waiver of certain development and mitigation fees as provided for in RMC 4-1-210C. The fee waiver will assist RHA in providing new affordable rental housing, encourage other capital investment in the area, and support c:\users\msantosjohnson\appdata\local\mlcrosoft\windows\temporary internet files\content,outlook\4axel9ih\glennwood townhomes waiver issue paper.doc Don Persson, Council President Page 3 of 3 November 28, 2011 the City's ongoing redevelopment efforts in the Sunset Area. The Glennwood Townhomes fee waiver supports the City's vision as the "Center of Opportunity in the Puget Sound region where businesses and families thrive", several 2011-2016 Business Plan Goals and the Sunset Area Community Investment Strategy. cc: C. E. "Chip" Vincent, Planning Director Neil Watts, Development Services Director Suzanne Dale Estey, Economic Development Director Mark Santos -Johnson, Senior Economic Development Specialist c:\users\msantosjohnson\appdata\local\mlcrosoft\windows\temporary internet files\contentoutlook\4axel9ih\glennwood townhomes waiver Issue paper.doc CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: December 20, 2011 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following Information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office, Project Name: RMA Glennwood Townhomes LUA (file) Number: LUA-11-054, SA -A Cross -References: AKA's: Project Manager: Rocale Timmons Acceptance Date: July 1, 2011 Applicant: Joel Ing, Shelter Resources Owner: Renton Mousing Authority Contact: Guy Peckham, Bumgardner Architects PID Number: 7227801375;7227801380 ERC Decision Date: ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Approval: August 2, 2011 Appeal Period Ends: August 15, 2011 Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review for the construction two multi -family structures containing 4-townhome units each. Environmental review was conducted as part of the Sunset Area Planned Action EIS (LUA10-052). The subject property consists of two parcels, which would be consolidated as part of the proposal. Location: 1139, 1147 Glennwood Avenue NE Comments: City of Ston Department of -Community & Economic elopment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICAJJ.OA—�VVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Fz COMMENTS E.- JULY 15, 2011 APPLICATION NO: LUA11-054, SA -A, LOT COMBINATION DATE CIRCULAT • JULY 1, 2011 APPLICANT: Joel Ing, Shelter Resources, Inc, PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons PROJECTTITLE: RHA Glennwood Townhomes PROJECT REVIEWER: Jan Illian SITE AREA: 0.65 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 0 square feet LOCATION: 1147 Glennwood Avenue NE PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 11,560 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review for the construction two multi -family structures containing 4-townhome units each. Environmenta review was conducted as part of the Sunset Area Planned Action EIS (LUA10-052). The subject property consists of two parcels, which would be consolidated as part of the proposal, located between Edmonds Ave NE and Glenwood Ave NE Just north of Sunset Blvd NE. The project site totals 0.65 acres in area and is zoned Resesidential-14 (R-14). Surface parking, in the amount of 13 stalls, is being proposed on the southwestern portion of the site with open space to the north of the parking Access to the site is proposed via a curb cut along Glenwood Ave NE. There is an exisiting duplex located on site which is proposed for removal. The proposed site is located within Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection area. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li ht Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Histaric/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 0. COMMENTS I r C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. g6v 1 61 Signat Df Dliector or Authorized Representative Dat WAC.197-11-960 Environmental checklist. Purpose ofchecklist.- Renton Housing ButK- V 2900 NE I Oth 5t Po Box 2316 Benton, WR 98056-0316 EN VIRONMEN7AL CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if Jt can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiting preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the mosvprecise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. if you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. Ifyou have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably' related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use ofchecklist for nonprojecl proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SI IEET FOR NONTROJECr ACTIONS (part D), For nonprolect actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Glennwood Townhomes Mame of applicant: Renton Housing Authority Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 2900 NE 10'h Street Renton, WA 98056 (425) 226-1850 x223 Mark R. Gropper 4. Date checklist prepared: July 29, 2011 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): A,017nl 9 gento 41100,) 10/7 ftea �o n Construction is estimated to be 8 months commencing in mid-October 2011. 7. Do you have any plans for futureadditions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 6 No, no plans to expand the townhomes in unit count or size. r� 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. • A Phase 1 Environmental Report was done on the land in September 2009 by PBS Environmental and the findings concluded "No recognized environmental conditions are associated with the subject property." • In May 2011, Adapt Engineers conducted an asbestos good faith inspection and sampling and lead based paint test on the housing duplex that will be demolished prior to construction of the project. Asbestos containing materials (ACMs) were tested in twelve suspect areas including asphalt roofing material, asphalt moisture barrier layers, blown in insulation, gypsum wallboard, laminate sheet stock and mastics. "Sampling and testing -of the ACMs did not reveal detectable concentrations of asbestos. In conclusion, it is unlikely the proposed demolition proiect will disturb siggificant guantities of ACMs." The testing of lead based paint revealed the exterior paint to have concentrations of lead above 5,000 ppm and therefore meet the federal definition of lead based paint. It was recommended that the contractor demolishing the duplex be notified of the presence of lead so they could comply with worker protection and existing EPA regulations. The sampling of interior paint did not find detectable concentration of lead. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. • No, no governmental approvals are currently being sought or are outstanding an the proposed Project. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. • We are seeking building (and related) permit approval from the city of Renton. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this fonts to include additional specific information on project description.) • This new construction Renton Housing Authority (RHA) project will be constructed on a _acre multi -family land site it acquired in 2003 and December 2009. This eight unit townhome project help address the replacement housing needs of that will exist upon the demolition of Sunset Terrace, an 8 acre I- UD 100 unit public housing development located at the center of Sunset Terrace and virtually adjacent to the Project site. RHA has pledged a 1:1 replacement of units to be loss at Sunset Terrace, and this Project will include the difficult to replace eight 4 bedroom units. • The character of the building and use of materials will reflect the future, and utilize current, up-to-date, sustainable, rain screen cladding systems. The building will meet Evergreen Sustainable Standards at a minimum and look for opportunities to exceed these requirements, The building will be carefully fit to the landscape, providing opportunities for easy use of outdoor spaces and access to nearby amenities. • The units will be over 1,400 s.f. each totaling 11,336 total square feet. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. • The project will be constructed on 1139 and 1147 Glennwood Avenue which are two contiguous sites owned by Renton Housing Authority. Legal description: Lot 9, Block 42 corrected plat of Renton Highland No. 2, according to the pat thereof, recorded in volume 57 of plats, pages) 92-98 inclusive, in King County, Washington. Lot 10, Block 42 corrected plat of Renton Highland No, 2, according to the pat thereof, recorded in volume 57 of plats, page(s) 92-98 inclusive, in King County, Washington. • Survey/topographical map attached. I/ B. FNVIRONMFNTAL ELEMFNTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other...... • The site is generally flat sloping slightly to the west. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? • There is a 5.2% slope on the property. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. • Soil is glacial deposit till, covered by a brown silty sand with traces of gravel and cobbles. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. • No, no indications of unstable soil. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any tilling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. • Approximately 1300 CY of fill will be required. Fill will come from an approved WSDOT source. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. • No erosion is expected with the construction silework. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? • Final impervious site coverage: 29%. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: • We will use silt fences and bales of bay to control sediment erosion and runoff. a. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. • There will be some dust emission expected from the site work but not an extraordinary amount for the common construction methods we will be utilizing. • No extraordinary or automobile emission is expected to occur during construction. • The approximate quantities of dust and emission is immeasurable. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. • No, no off-site emissions or odor will affect our project. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: • None contemplated or deemed necessary. 3 3. Water, a. Surface; • Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. • No, no water body is immediately in the vincinty of the site 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. • n/a 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fil I material. • n/a 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. • n/a 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. • No, the project site does not lie within a 100 year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? if so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. • No, no discharge from the project will be made into surface water. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known, • No, no groundwater will be withdrawn or water discharged to ground water. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. • No waste material will be discharged into the ground from the project c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Stormwater runoff will be collected and detained into a new detention vault which will release flows to match predeveloped runoff rates per City of Renton standards and requirements. Stormwater will be treated to meet the City of Renton standards and requirements. Stormwater will maintain natural discharge flow patterns and eventually drain to the City of Renton Storm drainage system which discharges to Lake Washington. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? Ifso, generally describe. 0 No, we do not believe any waste materials will enter the ground or surface waters d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: • Flow Control BMPs include the use of pervious asphalt. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X — deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? • Native grass will be removed from the site and replaced with new grass and a larger landscape c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. • Mone d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: • Proposed landscaping is a mix of both native and non-native plant materials selected for durability, low-water requirements, and low maintenance requirements. Plants selected are a mix of both deciduous and evergreen types and are intended to improve the shrub layer habitat throughout the site, which is presently non-existent. 'These improvements will be reflected through the enhancement of forage and cover for both birds and insects. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: None mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: No c. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site, None d. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No, the project is not part of a migration route e. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None required 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. • The project will use electricity for heat and appliances. 5 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. • No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: • We will incorporate energy star appliances in the kitchen, compact fluorescent lighting in the units and on the exterior (to the extent possible) of the building, electric meter, energy efficient domestic water heaters, deadband heat control which will turn off the heat entirely when turned to the off position, high rated wall insulation, and low E double paned window. 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. • No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. • n/a 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: • n/a b. Noise l) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? • We do not believe any external noise will affect the project, it is located on a quiet residential street. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. • We are not expecting any extraordinary construction noise to occur other than what one would expect with the construction of a stick built eight unit townhome. • We are required to hook -into a 12" watermain about 1,000 feet from the project site, so there will removal and replacement of asphalt on the road. • Our contractor has not been selected yet, but we anticipate the construction hours to be between 8:00 am — 5:00 pm Monday through Friday. • We do not expect any long term extraordinary noise created by the project. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: • We will have posted construction times as noted and will not work outside those hours unless under special circumstances and with notice. We will also consider the peace of immediate neighbors during the entire construction process. 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? • The property is currently vacant on one portion and used as a duplex on another portion. The resident will be moving out August 8 and will receive relocation assistance. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. • No c. Describe any structures on the site. • There is currently a one story wood duplex on a portion of the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? • There is currently a one story wood duplex on a portion of the site that will be demolished. We have followed the Uniform Relocation Assistance policies and been in touch with relocation specialists on our plan. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? • The project is currently zoned R-14 (14 units per acre) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? • RHA and the city of Renton (City) have spent many years of community planning on a major revitalization of the Sunset Terrace Area Community neighborhood ("Sunset Terrace"), located in northeast Renton. The plans for the Sunset Terrace redevelopment include a new community consisting of 350-450 mixed use multi and single family rental units along with public facilities such as a new county library, centrally located public park, and commercial space all linked to surrounding homes, businesses, and schools by an enhanced trail system. This redevelopment plan will span the next 5-10 years and will seek significant local and federal resources to accomplish a transformation of the Sunset Terrace Community neighborhood into a more vibrant and diverse mixed use regional center g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? • n/a h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. • No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? • The eight unit 4 bedroom will house around 32 people j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? • One resident will be displaced as a result of the project. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: • We have provided early notifications to the residents to be displaced, services if necessary, and financial and rental assistance with the move. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: • The project was included as part of a major Environmental Impact Statement of the immediate Sunset Terrace neighborhood to ensure changes to infrastructure included the development. We have also worked closely with the city of Renton to comply with all land use regulations through pre -planning meetings and our ultimate submittal for building permit. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. • The project consists of eight 4 bedroom townhomes that will be three stories high, one units will be ADA accessible All the units will serve low income families, some if not all receiving HUD Section 8 rental assistance. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 7 • One townhome will be eliminated which is the home to low income residents. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: • The project will house families to be displaced from the demolition of the Sunset Terrace Public Housing project which is a half of a block away so the project will help reduce the potentially negative impacts from displacement. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? • The project will be three stories high, so the roof ridgeline will be 33' above finish grade. The exterior siding will be painted cement board siding, used as horizontal lap siding and in panels to create visual interest. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? • The residents to the north, south and east will view a three story townhome project rather than a vacant property and one with a one story duplex located on it. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: • We have worked closely with the city to ensure the design fits into the immediate area and be appealing to the eye. The surrounding residences are mostly wood duplexes built in the 1940s and rented to families • Great care has been taken to design aesthetically pleasing buildings that will tit well in the neighborhood. To this end, a number of elements have been employed: steeply pitched gable roofs, modulated building massing, covered front porches with angled bay windows, simple and clean detailing with alternating siding materials, double hung windows, entries and bays at building sides (prevents a blank fagade). 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? • The light and glare should have a minimal impact with standard sized windows proposed and parking in the back of the buildings; to the west (back of project) is a vacant property owned by Renton Housing Authority. Lights will be turned on during dark periods of the day and glare, if any, will occur from certain times of the day when the sun's light reflects off the windows. • There will be minimal, non -glare site lighting to provide illumination for security/safety at the interior walkway, parking area, and recycle/waste station. Unit entries will have non -glare lights at the front porch and rear patio b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? • No, we do not think light or glare from the project will provide any safety hazard or interfere with views. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? • Light from existing street lighting on Glennwood Avenue, and glare from unshielded light fixtures on existing neighboring properties will affect the proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any, • Townhome units will have window coverings (e.g. blinds) to control undesired off-site light entering the units. Also, a privacy fence is planned along the north property line to provide additional shielding from light/glare from the northern neighboring property. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? • The Project is in a community with services readily available in the Sunset Terrace neighborhood and within walking distance of the Project, including a recently constructed fire station, city library (to be replaced at Sunset Terrace), retail and grocery shopping, restaurants, and two public elementary schools, all mostly to the south of the property. There are ample public playgrounds and sports fields, and numerous churches also within walking distance of the site. King County Metro transit (route 1 I 1 and 909) is readily available at the doorstop of the Project along Kirkland Avenue, and the property is about a mile northeast of an Interstate 405 exit and entrance. • Just west of Interstate 405, a couple miles from the Project, is a recently completed 65 acre major mixed used development known as the The Landing which includes major retailers such as Target, LA Fitness, Frys Electronics and outdoor shopping and dining similar to University Village in Seattle. The Landing includes 395 units of market rate multifamily housing. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. • No, the project will not displace any existing recreational uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: • Not applicable. 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. • No, there are places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. • None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: • Not applicable. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. • The project is fronted by Glennwood Avenue which is connected to Harrington Avenue to the cast. Harrington intersects NE Sunset Boulevard , a major east / west thoroughfare that intersects 1405 about a half mile to the southwest of the Property. The public streets and highways serving the site are shown on the cover sheet of the drawings. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? • The nearest public transit stop, route 240, is approximately 2 blocks south on Sunset Boulevard. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? • The project will create 12 parking spaces and will not eliminate any spaces d, Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). • We are not creating any new roads but are granting the city of Renton a 1' (one foot) easement. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. • No, the project will not use water, rail or air transportation. f. Howmany vehicular trips per day would be -generated. by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. • The project is replacement housing units for the Sunset Terrace Public I-Iousing units located '/z block away so there will not be any new vehicular trips generated by the project, but we do estimate 24 vehicular trips per working day: 12 working parents x 2 trips per day. • Peak times will be 7:30 — 9:00 am and 4:00 — 6:30 pm each working day. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: • We will continue to encourage the use of public transit through informal informational messages. 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? Ifso, generally describe. • No, as mentioned above the 8 units are replacement units of 8 units to be demolished 'h block away so no impact on any public services is expected. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. • n/a 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. • Electricity, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer is available at the site. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. • To provide sufficient water pressure and for fire flow purposes, we will be hooking into a 12" watermain at Harrington and 12'h Street located approximately 1000 feet from the site. This will require a cut and patch of the existing road leading to our project. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them;to make its d.ecisi Signature: ............ .................................. . DateSubmitted: August 1, 20 1.1 ............................................................................................................................................. 10 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air, pro- duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplain, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT S. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. IFA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY ityof ' AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN REPORT & DECISION A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST REPORT DATE: August 2, 2011 Project Name: RHA Glennwood Townhomes Owner: Renton Housing Authority; 2900 NE 101h St; Renton, WA 98056 Applicant: Shelter Resources; Joel Ing; 2223 112Th Ave NE, Ste #102; Bellevue, WA 98004 Contact: Bumgardner Architects; Guy Peckham; 2111 Third Ave; Seattle, WA 98121 rile Number: LUA11-054, SA -A Project Manager: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner Project Summary: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review for the construction two multi -family structures containing 4-townhome units each. The subject property consists of two parcels, which would be consolidated as part of the proposal, located between Edmonds Ave NE and Glennwood Ave NE just north of Sunset Blvd NE. The project site totals 0.65 acres in area and is zoned Resesidential-14 (R-14). Surface parking, in the amount of 13 stalls, is being proposed on the southwestern portion of the site with open space to the north of the parking area. Access to the site is proposed via a curb cut along Glennwood Ave NE. There is an existing duplex located on site which is proposed for removal. The proposed site is located within Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection area. Environmental Review was conducted as part of the Sunset Area Planned Action EIS (LUA10-052). Project Location: 1147 Glennwood Ave NE Site Area: 28,484 (0.65 ac) Total Building Area GSr: 11,560 SF Site Plan Report. doc c'ry°f. DEPARTMENT OF COMM 1TY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 4'4Ih1�+M�ElM�• R B. EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 Zoning and Neighborhood Detail Map Exhibit 2 Site Plan Exhibit 3 landscape Plan Exhibit 4 Elevations (Building #2) Exhibit 5 East Elevation (Building #1) Exhibit 6 North Elevation (Building #1) Exhibit 7 South Elevation (Building #1) Exhibit 8 West Elevation (Building #1) Exhibit 9 Aerial Photo of Project Site Exhibit 10 SEPA "Planned Action" Memo Exhibit 11 Sunset Planned Action Area Map C. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner(s) of Record: 2. Zoning Designation: 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: Renton Housing Authority 2900 NE 101h St Renton, WA 98056 Residential -14 du/ac (R-14) Center Village (CV) Existing duplex to be removed 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: a. North: Duplex (Residential -14 du/ac) b. East: Duplex (Residential -14 du/ac) c. South: Duplex (Residential -14 du/ac) d. West: Vacant (Center Village) 6. Proposed Orientation: East / Glennwood Ave NE 7. Access: Via new curb cut extended from Glennwood Ave NE S. Site Area: 28,484 (0.65 ac) D. HISTORICALIBACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Comprehensive Plan N/A 4924 11/1/2004 Zoning N/A 5099 12/5/2005 Annexation N/A 1795 10/7/1959 Sunset Area Planned LUA10-052 5610 6/13/2011 Action EIS Site Plan Report. doc City of Renton Deportment of Communit conomic Development inistrative Site Plan Report & Decision RNA GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LUA11-OS4, SA -A Report of August 2, 2011 Page 3 of 16 E. BACKGROUND The proposal is the first of a group of projects collectively known as the Sunset Area Planned Action and Environmental Impact Statement (Sunset Area PA/EIS) and is the first step in Renton Mousing Authority's redevelopment of the Sunset Terrace community. The proposed 8 residential units, containing both 3 and 4 bedroom, would be used as relocation housing for the Sunset Terrace housing community. The Glennwood townhomes, would be sited on two parcels which front onto Glennwood Ave NE just south of NE 12th St. The property is zoned Residential -14 du/ac (R-14) and within the Center Village (CV) land use designation. A total of 13, including 1 accessible, parking spaces are proposed on the site within a surface parking area located on the southwestern portion of the site. New landscaping is proposed around the perimeter of the site and the surface parking lot. The applicant proposes to excavate and balance all fill on-site. Access would be gained from one new curb cut; south of the two structures. Pedestrian walkways are provided along the eastern facades which connect each individual unit to the public sidewalk on Glennwood Ave NE. A pedestrian connection is also proposed from Glennwood Ave NE, in between the two proposed structures, to the play area which is located on the northwestern portion of the site. The proposed structures are rectangular in shape, with an extended portion, to the west, on the northern structure in order to accommodate ADA access. The structures combined would be approximately 11,560 gross square feet in area. The height of the proposed structures would be 30 feet and 0 inches at the average height of the pitched roof elements. The proposed refuse and recycling area would be located within screened enclosures on the southwest portion of the site. There are six trees located on site of which two would be retained. There are no known critical areas on or near the site. F. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various City departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the appropriate recommendations have been incorporated into this report. G. CONSISTENCY WITH SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA The Site Development Plan Review Criteria set forth in Section 4-9-200 of the Renton Municipal Code forms the basis of the Site Plan Review, as follows: 1. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies The Comprehensive Plan land Use Map designation for the subject property is Center Village. The purpose of the Center Village is to provide an opportunity for redevelopment of urban mixed and residential uses that are pedestrian -oriented. The proposal is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Community Design Element policies as long as all conditions of approval are complied with: Land Use Element Policy LU -244. Encourage more urban style design and intensity of development (e.g. building height, bulk, landscaping, parking) within Center Villages than with land uses outside the Centers. ✓ Policy Objective Met ONot Met Site Plan Report.doc City of Renton Department of Communi' -conomic Development rinistrative Site Plan Report & Decision RHA GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LUA11-054, SA -A Report of August 2, 2011 Page 4 of 16 Policy LU -247. Prohibit new garden style multi -family development. ✓ Policy Objective Met ❑Not Met Community Design Element Policy CD -17: Development should be designed (e.g. building orientation, setbacks, landscape areas and open space, parking, and outdoor activity areas) to result in a high quality development as a primary goal, rather than to maximize density as a first consideration. ✓ Policy Objective Met 17 Not Met Policy CD -21: Development should have buildings oriented toward the street or a common area rather than toward parking lots. ✓ Polity Objective Met ❑Not Met 2. Conformance with existing land use regulations a. Density: The allowed density range in the R-14 zoning designation is a minimum of 10 dwelling units per net acre (du/ac) up to a maximum of 14 du/ac. Net density is calculated after public rights-of-way, private access easements, and critical areas are deducted from the gross acreage of the site. After deducting no more than 1,000 square feet for right-of-way dedications, from the 28,484 gross square footage of the site, the net square footage would be 27,484 square feet (0.631 net acres). The 8 unit proposal would arrive at a net density of 12.67 dwelling units per acre (8units / 0.631 acres = 12.67 du/ac), which falls within the permitted density range for the R-14 zoning designation. b. Lot Coverage and Impervious Surface: The R-14 zoning designation does not have a maximum building coverage. The maximum impervious area allowed in the R-14 zoning designation is 85 percent. The proposed impervious area of the site would be 8,503 square feet, on the 28,484 square foot project site, resulting in an impervious cover of 29 percent. The proposal complies with the impervious cover requirements of the zone. C. Setbacks: The R-14 zoning designation requires a minimum front yard setback of 8 feet to the building, 5 feet to the porch, or 7 feet to a stoop. The minimum side yard setback is 4 feet for the unattached sides of the structure and 0 feet for the attached sides. The minimum rear yard setback is 12 feet, except when the rear yard is abutting a common open space, then 4 feet. The proposed building would be set back from the front property line approximately 8 feet at the closest point with allowed encroachments for bay windows of 2 feet. A 65 -foot rear yard setback, at the closest point, is proposed from the west property line. The proposed structure would have a 4 -foot side yard setback, from the north property line and an 37 -foot side yard setback from the southern property line at the closest points. There is a 20 -foot separation between the two structures. The proposal complies with the setback requirements of the zone. Landscaping and Tree Retention: The site contains 6 trees of which 4 are proposed for removal. Renton Municipal Code requires that 10 percent -of the trees on site be retained. Of the 6 trees, 1 tree is required to be retained at the 10 percent retention rate. As proposed the applicant would comply with the tree retention requirements of the code. The applicant will be required to comply with protection measures for retained trees as set forth in RMC 4-4-1301-18 during construction. The R-14 zone requires a 10 -foot on site landscape strip along the street frontage, except where reduced through the site plan development review process. The landscaping requirements apply to the subject site's Glennwood Ave frontage. A conceptual landscape plan was submitted with the project application. The applicant is requesting a modification, as part of the site plan application, in order to reduce the landscaping by more than 2 feet along Glennwood Ave NE down to 8 feet. Site Plan Report.doc City of Renton Department of Communit 'conomic Development inistrative Site Plan Report & Decision RNA GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES CUAII-054, SA-A Report of August 2, 2011 Page 5 of 16 The landscape plan includes a planting plan; the proposed tree species largely consist of vine maple, sugar maple, Raywood ash and Pennsylvania ash trees. The shrubs proposed largely consist of: dwarf English boxwood, dwarf Japanese barberry, and Aztec pearl Mexican orange. Groundcover would consist of firewitch garden pink, starry false Gly -of the -valley, and biokovo cranesbill. Conditions of approval, related to landscaping within the Design Review table below, if complied with, the landscape plan would provide visual relief, define areas of pedestrian circulation, and add to the aesthetic enjoyment of the area. Therefore the modification for a reduction in width from 10 to 8 feet along the frontage of the site is approved. Underground sprinkler systems are required to be installed and maintained for all landscaped areas. The sprinkler system shall provide full water coverage of the planted areas specified on the plan. A revised detailed landscape plan and irrigation plan will need to be submitted at the time of building permit review d. Height: The R-14 zone allows a maximum building height of 30 feet. The height of the proposed structure would be 30 feet and 0 inches in height at the average height of the 12:12 pitched roof, which complies with the height requirements of the zone. e. Parking: The parking regulations require a specific number of off-street parking stalls be provided based on the number of residential units. The followine ratios would be applicable to the site: Use Number of Units Ratio Required SSRaces Low Income 8 Min: 1 space / 4 units Min: 2 Attached Max: 1.75 spaces / unit Max: 14 Residences Based on these use requirements, a maximum of 14 parking spaces would be allowed. The applicant proposed to provide a total of 13 spaces which is within the allowable range. The parking conforms to the minimum requirements for drive aisle and parking stall dimensions and the provision of ADA accessible parking stalls. Based on the proposal for 8 residential units, 4 bicycle parking stalls are required to be provided. The applicant has proposed 4 bicycle parking stalls on site complying with the standards outline in RMC 4-4-080F.c. f. Refuse and Recyclable Deposit Areas: The City's refuse and recyclable standards for a multi -family development require minimum of 1- 1/2 square feet per dwelling unit for recyclables deposit areas. A minimum of 3 square feet per dwelling unit shall be provided for refuse deposit areas. A total minimum area of 80 square feet shall be provided for refuse and recyclables deposit areas. Based on the proposed 8 units the minimum 80 square feet of refuse deposit areas would be required. The applicant has proposed a 134 square foot area to be dedicated to refuse and recyclables. As proposed the refuse and recyclable area exceeds the minimum size requirements. The applicant is proposing a refuse and recycle station that would be constructed of concrete walls with metal doors and include a sloped roof for weather protection. The applicant has minimized the negative impact to the street and tenants by locating the refuse and recycle station in the rear yard area alongside the. vehicle access aisle and next to the parking area. The location is easily accessible and provides adequate screening from the public. 3. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses City staff does not anticipate any adverse impacts on surrounding properties and uses as long as the conditions of approval are complied with. All parcels immediately surrounding the subject property are Site Plan Report.doc City of Renton Deportment of Communif -conomic Development inistrotive Site Plan Report & Decision RNA GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LUA11-054, SA-A Report of August 2, 2021 Page 6 of 16 zoned R-14 with the exception of the property to the west which is zoned CV. The property to the west is also owned by the RHA and they plan to construct additional multi -family residential housing at a future date as part of the Sunset Terrace redevelopment project. The proposed residential use is anticipated to be compatible with existing and future surrounding uses as permitted in the R-14 and CV zones. The design of the townhomes is modern in appearance, making use of two principal siding patterns - horizontal and paneled. In order to reflect the modern design the townhomes have been defined with simple edges and detailing. The scale, height and bulk of the proposed buildings are appropriate for the site. The two structures have been limited to a front facade width of 64 feet. Outboard units in each building have been set back 2 feet to reduce the building scale and mass. The roofs are articulated with steep pitches that scale down the building size. Front porches with bays and columns, along with side bays, contribute to the human scale of the building. Exterior light fixtures are also proposed in order to enhance the unit entries (Exhibit 4). The scale and bulk of the buildings are also reduced through the use of differing materials. The buildings are comprised of cement plank and board siding, vinyl windows and metal canopies. The panel siding would be used on the front and rear facades in conjunction with window placement in order to enhance the surface design. The primary entrances would be located along the eastern fayade. Each unit has a private entrance separated by landscaped front yards. The visual character of the proposed structures and potentially the entire Sunset Terrace Redevelopment subarea would change from its current state to a pedestrian -oriented community with a mix of residential uses. The construction of new multi -family, which would replace the older structure on site, would result in an overall improvement of the visual environment. 4. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site One of the two subject parcels is currently vacant and the other contains a duplex which is proposed for removal. Staff recommends, as a condition of approval, the applicant obtain a demolition permit for the existing structure and all required inspections prior to the temporary occupancy of the first building. The site is nearly level with slopes of 4 percent or less with a high point at the northwest corner of the site. The low point of the site is located at the southwest corner. The applicant proposes to excavate and balance all fill on site. Following development impervious surface coverage will be approximately 29 percent. The applicant is proposing common open space located within the rear yard in the northwestern portion of the site. It would include a children's play area surrounded by lawn area and fixed outdoor seating. The proposed common open space complies with the residential design standards for open space. The proposal includes an extension, of Unit #1, to the west beyond the rest of the structure's western fagade plane in order to accommodate ADA accessibility for the end unit. The extension frames the common green space and does not contain any meaningful articulation or breaks in the fagade or glazing. Windows should represent a significant amount of the facade of a home when facing a common space, they amplify the sense that the community is oriented to people. In order to provide a visual break and create visual interest the following condition of approval is recommended: The applicant shall incorporate either articulation on the southern fagade of the extended portion of Unit #1, or as an alternative provide glazing, along the same facade, in combination with enhanced landscaping abutting the fagade. The applicant shall submit to, and have approved by, the Current Planning Project Manager, the revised elevation and landscaping plan prior to or concurrent with building permit approval. Site Plan Report.doc City of Renton Department of Communi, "conomic Development inistrative Site Plan Report & Decision RHA GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LLlA11-054, SA -A Report of August 2, 2011 Page 7 of 16 The applicant is proposing landscaping around the perimeter of the site and surface parking lot which includes 15 deciduous trees, several shrubs, perennials and groundcovers. The landscape plan includes a planting plan; the proposed tree species largely consist of vine maple, sugar maple, Raywood ash and Pennsylvania ash trees. The shrubs proposed largely consist of: dwarf English boxwood, dwarf Japanese barberry, and Aztec pearl Mexican orange. Groundcover would consist of firewitch garden pink, starry false lily -of the -valley, and biokovo cranesbill. The proposed landscaping would provide visual relief, define areas of pedestrian circulation, and add to the aesthetic enjoyment of the area. However, the planting plan does not include a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees in order to maintain a tree canopy all year. Therefore staff recommends, as a condition of approval, the applicant submit a revised planting plan depicting a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees on site. The revised planting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval. The applicant is proposing a predominately 6 -foot tall fence along the northern property line. It does not appear a similar fence is proposed along the southern property line. As a condition of approval the applicant would be required to construct an identical fence along the south property line. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to or concurrent with the building permit approval. S. Conservation of area -wide property values The proposed residential development is expected to enhance and increase property values in the vicinity of the site. Adding residential population would also improve the customer base for commercial businesses in the area. 6. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation Frontage improvements are required to be constructed in the right-of-way fronting the site in Glennwood Ave NE. Existing right-of-way width in Glennwood Ave NE is 50 feet. In order to meet the City's complete street standards, half -street improvements including 13 feet of pavement from the centerline, a 5 -foot sidewalk, and an 8 -foot planter strip are required. One foot will be required to be dedicated to the City for right-of-way. This will allow for a 26 -foot half street. Street lighting is also required to be installed along the frontage of Glennwood Ave NE. The applicant is required to demonstrate compliance with the street and lighting standards outlined in the Renton Municipal Code at the time of construction permit application. The proposed project would have direct access onto Glennwood Ave NE via a new curb cut. There is a two-way circulation, 20 -foot wide, access road on the souther portion of the site which dead ends in a hammerhead turnaround. In addition, pedestrian sidewalks along the new public right-of-way, as well as private pedestrian connections at the perimeter of the property are proposed to provide safe and efficient pedestrian access throughout the site. The applicant has proposed a primary pathway, 6 feet in width, to be used to connect the public sidewalk and parking lot to the play and seating area on the northwestern portion of the site. The front yards also contain entry walks, to each individual unit, that have a width of 3 feet. The proposed development is expected to maintain the safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicle circulation on the site. 7. Provision of adequate light and air The buildings have been located on the east side of the site to provide solar access to the townhomes and the common open space area. The proposed building is designed appropriately to allow adequate light and air circulation to the buildings and the site. The design of the structures would not result in excessive shading of the property. In addition, there is ample area surrounding the building to provide Site Plan Report.doc City of Renton Department of Commu&-conomic Development +nistrative Site Plan Report & Decision RNA GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LLlA11-054, SA -A Report of August 2, 2011 Page 8 of 16 normal airflow. Proposed fencing and landscaping has been proposed around the perimeter of the site that would mitigate the light impacts to the abutting properties. 8. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions It is anticipated that the most significant noise, odor, and other potentially harmful impacts would occur during the construction phase of the project. The applicant has submitted Construction Mitigation Plan that provides measures to reduce construction impacts such as noise control, control of dust and traffic controls. The proposed development would not generate any long term harmful or unhealthy conditions. There would be traffic impacts that are normally associated with an increase in residential population. 9. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use Fire and Police Department staff has indicated that existing facilities are adequate to accommodate the subject proposal. The proposal is considered relocation housing. Therefore impacts fee would not be imposed for the project. Additionally, to provide a catalyst for redevelopment, the City Council is currently in the process of establishing a housing incentive fee waiver to support new multi -family rental housing in the Sunset Area. The City Council unanimously supported the first reading of the ordinance at the July 18, 2011, meeting and the ordinance was adopted with the second reading at the August 1, 2011 meeting. On September 4, 2011, when in place, the housing incentive will provide a mechanism for the City Council to waive 100% of the following fees: building permit fees; building permit plan review fees; water, surface water and wastewater system development charges; public works plan review and inspection fees; and fire, transportation and parks impact mitigation fees. The site is served by the City of Renton for all utilities. There is an existing 6 -inch cast iron water main in Glennwood Ave NE with an available fire flow of 1,500 gpm. The site is currently within the City 435 - hydraulic water pressure zone. The approximate static water pressure at street level elevation (346 ft) is 38 psi. A %-inch domestic meter serves the existing building. There is an 8 -inch sanitary sewer main also in Glennwood Ave NE. There are no storm conveyance system or street frontage improvements in Glennwood Ave NE. Infrastructure improvements would be required in order to provide adequate water and sewer service to property. The applicant would be required to provide water and sewer service to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division and would be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. A drainage plan and drainage report has been submitted with the site plan application. The report shows preliminary compliance with 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWM, Chapters 1 and 2 subject to engineering review with the construction plans. All core and six special requirements are contained in the report. Based on the City's flow control map, this site falls within the Peak Rate Flow Control Standard, Existing Site Conditions. The drainage report discusses meeting the area specific flow control requirement under Core Requirement #3. Installation of a detention tank and a storm filter cartridge system are proposed. The Renton School District has provided assurance that students living in the proposed residences can be accommodated at existing facilities. Students would attend Kennydale Elementary, McKnight Middle School and Hazen High School. The proposal is considered relocation housing and therefore would not be required to pay school impact fees. 10. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight The proposal would redevelop a site that is currently underutilized with attached residential units; which would be compatible with existing and planned residential and commercial uses in the surrounding neighborhood and would begin to implement the Sunset Area Planned Action. The investment in the area and the added presence of a residential population would serve to prevent Site Plan Report.doc City of Renton Department of Communis conomic Development inistrative Site Plan Report & Decision RNA GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LUASI-054, SA-A Report of August 2, 2011 Page 9 of 16 neighborhood deterioration and blight. Coordinated site improvements including landscaping, parking, signage and lighting would be included as part of this development. 11. Compliance to Residential Design Standards The proposed project is subject to the Residential Design Regulations (RMC4-2-115). The Administrator shall have the authority of approve, approve with conditions, or deny proposals based on the provisions of the design regulations. The proposed project meets the intent of the Design Regulations where the regulations are applicable if all conditions of approval are complied with. A. SITE DESIGN: 1. Lot Configuration: Variety in the configuration of lots enhances the image of variety of housing stock and helps minimize perceptions of monotony. N/A Minimum Standard: Developments of more than nine (9) detached dwellings shall incorporate a variety of home sizes, lot sizes, and unit clusters. 2. Garages: The minimization of the visual impact of garages contributes to creating communities that are oriented to people and pedestrians, as opposed to automobiles. ✓ Minimum Standard: Carports are prohibited. Minimum Standard: One of the following is required; the garage must be: N/A 1) Recessed from the front of the house and/or front porch at least eight feet (8'); or 2) Detached. N/A Minimum Standard: Garage design shall be of similar design to the homes. Minimum Standard: A minimum eighteen feet (18') driveway length from the face of N/A the garage to the back of the sidewalk or access easement/lane is required, unless accessed by an alley. Minimum Standard: If sides of the garage are visible from streets, lanes, sidewalks, N/A pathways, trails, or other homes, architectural details shall be incorporated in the design. Minimum Standard: If shared garages are allowed, they may share the structure with other homes and all of the following is required: 1) Each unit has garage space assigned to it; and N/A 2) The garage is not to be located further than one hundred sixty feet (160') from any of the housing units to which it is assigned; and 3) The garage shall not exceed forty-four feet (44') in width, and shall maintain an eight foot (8') separation from any dwellings. B. OPEN SPACE: 1. Open Space: Intent: Open space is a significant element in the development of livable communities and creates opportunities for good health. ✓ Minimum Standard: For developments that are less than ten (10) net acres: No park is required, but is allowed. Minimum Standard: For developments that are greater than ten (10) net acres: A N/A minimum of one one-half (.5) acre park, in addition to the common open space requirement, is required. N/A Minimum Standard: Developments of three (3) or less dwelling units: No requirement to provide common open space. Developments of four (4) or more units: Required to provide common open space as Site Plan Report.doc City of Renton Deportment of Communit-conomic Development inistrative Site Plan Report & Decision RHA GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LUA11-054, SA -A Report of August 2, 2011 Page 10 of 16 Site Plon Report. doc follows. ✓ Minimum Standard: For each unit in the development, three hundred fifty (350) square feet of common open space shall be provided. Minimum Standard: Open space shall be designed as a park, common green, pea -patch, pocket park, or pedestrian entry easement in the development and shall include picnic areas, space for small recreational activities, and other activities as appropriate. ✓ Minimum Standard: Open space shall be located in a highly visible area and be easily accessible to the neighborhood. ✓ Minimum Standard: Open space shall be contiguous, serve a minimum of four (4) homes, and be at least twenty feet (20') wide. Minimum Standard: A pedestrian entry easement can be used to meet the N/A requirements if it has a minimum width of twenty feet (20') with a minimum five feet (5') of sidewalk. Minimum Standard: Pea -patches shall be at least one thousand (1,000) square feet in size with individual plots that measure ten feet by ten feet (10' x 10'). Additionally, the pea -patch shall include a tool shed and a common area with N/A space for compost bins. Water shall be provided to the pea -patch. Fencing that meets the standards for front yard fencing shall surround the pea -patch with a one foot (1') landscape area on the outside of the fence. This area is to be landscaped with flowers, plants, and/or shrubs. Minimum Standard: Grass-crete or other pervious surfaces may be used in the N/A common open space for the purpose of meeting the one hundred fifty feet (150') distance requirement for Emergency Vehicle Access. Minimum Standard: Storm ponds may be used to meet the common open space N/A requirement if designed to accommodate a fifty (50) year storm and to be dry ninety percent (90%) of the year. Minimum Standard: Developments of three (3) or less dwelling units: Each individual N/A lot shall have a private yard that is at minimum six hundred (600) square feet in size. Backyard patios and reciprocal use easements may be included in the calculation of private yard. Minimum Standard: Developments of four (4) or more dwelling units: Each individual ✓ lot shall have a private yard that is at least two hundred fifty (250) square feet in size with no dimension less than eight feet (8') in width. C. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN: 1. Primary Entry: Intent: Homes with a visually prominent front entry foster the sense that the community is oriented to pedestrians. Features like porches and stoops at the front entry provide opportunity for social interaction and can contribute to a sense of place for residents. Additionally, porches work to minimize the appearance of bulk by breaking up the facade. ✓ Minimum Standard: The entry shall take access from and face a street, park, common green, pocket park, pedestrian easement, or open space. ✓ Minimum Standard: The entry shall include one of the following: 1) Stoop: minimum size four feet by six feet (4'x 6') and minimum height twelve inches (12") above grade; or 2) Porch: minimum five feet (5') deep and minimum height twelve inches (12") above grade. Exception: in cases where accessibility (ADA) is a priority, an accessible route may be taken from a front driveway.. 2. Facade Modulation: Site Plon Report. doc City of Renton Department of Communit -conomic Development inistrative Site Plan Report & Decision RHA GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LUA11-054, SA -A Report of August 2, 2011 Page 11 of 16 The modulation of facades creates an appearance of variety, as well as visual breaks that help to create visual interest. ✓ Minimum Standard: The primary building elevation oriented toward the street or common green shall have at least one articulation or change in plane of at least two feet (2') in depth. Not Minimum Standard: A minimum one side articulation that measures at least one foot Compliant (1') in depth shall occur for all facades facing streets or public spaces. Staff Comment: See discussion and condition of approval above under Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site (pg 6). 3. Windows and Doors: Windows and front doors are an integral part of the architectural character of a home and when they incorporate architectural elements of the home, they contribute to the overall balance and integration of the building form. Additionally, when they represent a significant amount of the facade of a home, they amplify the sense that the community is oriented to people. ✓ Minimum Standard: Primary windows shall be proportioned vertically, rather than horizontally. N/A Minimum Standard: Vertical windows may be combined together to create a larger window area. ✓ Minimum Standard: All doors shall be made of wood, fiberglass, metal, or glass and trimmed with three and one half inches (3 1/2") minimum head and jamb trim around the door. N/A Minimum Standard: Screen doors are permitted. ✓ Minimum Standard: Primary entry doors shall face a street, park, common green, pocket park, or pedestrian easement and shall be paneled or have inset windows. ✓ Minimum Standard: Sliding glass doors are not permitted along a frontage elevation or an elevation facing a pedestrian easement. 4. Scale, Bulk, and Character Residential communities are intended for people and homes that have appropriate scale and bulk contribute to the sense of orientation to people. Variety in the character of homes helps to minimize visual monotony while helping to foster a perception of uniqueness of place. ✓ Minimum Standard: The primary building form shall be the dominating form and elements such as porches, principal dormers, or other significant features shall not dominate. ✓ Minimum Standard: Primary porch plate heights shall be one story. Stacked porches are allowed. Not Minimum Standard: To differentiate the same models and elevations, different Compliant colors shall be used. Staff Comment: A color palette was not provided as part of the Site Plan application materials. As a condition of approval the applicant would be required to demonstrate multiple colors on buildings are provided. A color palette shall be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval. N/A Minimum Standard: For single-family dwellings, no more than two (2) of the same model and elevation shall be built on the same block frontage and the same model and elevation shall not be abutting. S. Roofs: Roof forms and profiles are an important component in the architectural character of homes and contribute to the massing, scale, and proportion of the home. Roofs also provide opportunity to create variety, especially for homes of the same model. ✓ Minimum Standard: Primary roof pitch shall be a minimum six to twelve (6:12). If a gable roof is used, exit access from a third floor must face a public right of way for Site Plan Report. doc City of Renton Department of Communit `conomic Development inistrative Site Plan Report & Decision RHA GLENNWOOD TOWNNOMES LLlAII-OS4, SA -A Report of August 2, 2011 Page 12 of 16 Site Plan Report.doc emergency access. N/A Minimum Standard: A variety of roofing colors shall be used within the development and all roof material shall be fire retardant. 6. Eaves: The design of eaves and overhangs act as unifying elements in the architectural character of a home. When sized adequately and used consistently, they work to create desirable shadows that help to create visual interest especially from blank, unbroken wall planes. ✓Minimum Standard: Eaves shall be at least twelve inches (12") with horizontal fascia or fascia gutter at least five inches (5") deep on the face of all eaves. 7, Architectural Detailing: Architectural detailing contributes to the visual appeal of a home and the community. It helps to create a desirable human scale and a perception of a quality well designed home. Minimum Standard: Three and one half inches (3 1/2") minimum trim surrounds all windows and details all doors. ✓ Minimum Standard: At least one of the following architectural details shall be provided on each home: shutters, knee braces, flower boxes, or columns. ✓ Minimum Standard: Where siding is used, metal corner clips or corner boards shall be used and shall be at minimum two and one half inches (2 1/2") in width and painted. If shutters are used, they shall be proportioned to the window size to simulate the ability to cover them. ✓ Minimum Standard: If columns are used, they shall be round, fluted, or strongly related to the home's architectural style. Six inches by six inches (6" x 6") posts may be allowed if chamfered and/or banded. Exposed four inches by four inches (4" x 411) and six inches by six inches (6" x 6") posts are prohibited. 8. Materials and Color: The use of a variety of materials and color contributes to the sense of diversity of housing stock in the community. ✓ Minimum Standard: Acceptable exterior wall materials are: wood, cement fiberboard, stucco, stone, and standard sized brick three and one half inches by seven and one half inches (3 1/2" x 71/2") or three and five eighths inches by seven and five eighths inches (3 5/8" x 7 5/8"). Simulated stone, wood, stone, or brick may be used to detail homes. N/A Minimum Standard: When more than one material is used, changes in a vertical wall, such as from wood to brick, shall wrap the corners no less than twenty-four inches (24"). The material change shall occur at an internal corner or a logical transition such as aligning with a window edge or chimney. Material transition shall not occur at an exterior corner. Not Compliant Minimum Standard: Multiple colors on buildings shall be provided. Muted deeper tones, as opposed to vibrant primary colors, shall be the dominant colors. Color palettes for all new structures, coded to the home elevations, shall be submitted for approval. Staff Comment: A color palette was not provided as part of the Site Plan application materials. As a condition of approval the applicant would be required to demonstrate multiple colors on buildings are provided. A color palette shall be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval. Not Compliant Minimum Standard: Gutters and downspouts shall be integrated into the color scheme of the home and be painted, or of an integral color, to match the trim color. Staff Comment: See comments above. Site Plan Report.doc City of Renton Department of Communit-conomic Development inistrative Site Plan Report & Decision RHA GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LUA11-054, SA -A Report of August 2, 2011 Page 13 of 16 12. Compliance with Planned Action Ordinance Upon determination by the City's Environmental Review Committee that the proposal meets the criteria outlined in the Planned Action Ordinance (Ordinance #5610) and qualifies as a planned action, the proposal shall not require a SEPA threshold determination, preparation of an EIS, or be subject to further review pursuant to SEPA. The City's Environmental Review Committee designated, on August 1, 2011, the proposal as a "planned action", pursuant to RCQ 43.21C.030 (Exhibit 6), as it meets all of the following conditions: ✓ The proposal is located within the Planned Action area identified in Exhibit 7. ✓ The proposed uses and activities are consistent with those described in the Planned Action EIS and Planned Action Qualifications. ✓ The proposal is within the Planned Action thresholds and other criteria of the Planned Action Qualifications. ✓ The proposal is consistent with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan and applicable zoning regulations ✓ The proposal's significant adverse environmental impacts have been identified in the Planned Action EIS. ✓ The proposal's impacts have been mitigated by application of the measures identified in Attachment B of Ordinance#5610, and other applicable City regulations, together with any modifications or variances or special permits that may be required. ✓ The proposal complies with all applicable local, state and/or federal laws and regulations, and the Environmental Review Committee determines that these constitute adequate mitigation. ✓ The proposal is not an essential public facility as defined by RCW.36.70A.200(1). 11 H. FINDINGS Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1. Request: The Applicant has requested Administrative Site Plan Approval for RHA Glennwood Townhomes, LUA 11-054, SA -A 2. Environmental Review: The subject site is located within the Sunset Area Planned Action Area and was designated a Planned Action by the City's Environmental Review Committee. Therefore, the proposal does not required a SEPA threshold determination. 3. Site Plan Review: The applicant's Site Plan Review application complies with the requirements for information necessary for site plan review. The applicant's plans are attached to this report. 4. Comprehensive Plan: The subject site is designated Center Village (CV). S. Zoning: The site is zoned Residential -14 du/ac (R-14). i. CONCLUSIONS 1. The subject project complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval contained in this Report and Decision are complied with. Site Plan Report.doc City of Renton Department of Communit-conomic Development inistrative Site Plan Report & Decision RNA GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LUA11-054, SA -A Report of August 2, 2011 Page 14 of 16 2. The subject project complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Center Village, and the zoning designation of Residential -14 du/ac if all conditions of approval are met. �. DFCrsi )N The proposed site plan for RHA Glennwood Townhomes, File No. I.UA11-054, SA -A is approved and is subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall obtain a demolition permit for the existing structure and all required inspections, for the existing duplex on site, prior to the temporary occupancy of the building. 2. The applicant shall submit a revised planting plan depicting a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees on site. The revised planting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval. 3. The applicant shall incorporate either articulation on the southern fagade of the extended portion of Unit #1, or as an alternative provide glazing, along the same facade, in combination with enhanced landscaping abutting the facade. The applicant shall submit to, and have approved by, the Current Planning Project Manager, the revised elevation and landscaping plan prior to or concurrent with building permit approval. 4. The applicant shall construct a fence, identical to the fence proposed on the north property line, along the south property line. A revised landscape or fence detail plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to or concurrent with the building permit approval. S. The applicant shall demonstrate multiple colors on buildings are provided. A color palette shall be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURE: C'..F—u C.F. "Chip" Vincent, Planning Director Planning Division Site Plan Report.doc 7(z l Date City of Renton Department of Communis-conomic Development inistrative Site Plan Report & Decision RHA GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LUA11-054, SA-A Report of August 2, 2011 Page 15 of 16 TRANSM17TED this 2""day of August, 2011 to the Contact/Applicant/Owner: Contact: Applicant: Guy Peckham Joel Ing Bumgardner Architects Shelter Resources, Inc. 2111 Third Avenue 2223112th Avenue NE ste: #102 Seattle, WA 98121 Bellevue, WA 98004 TRANSMITTED this 2nd day of August, 2011 to the Parties of Record: None TRANSMITTED this 2nd day of August, 2011 to the following: Larry Meckling, Building Official Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Kayren Kittrick, Development Services Jon Conklin, Development Services Fire Marshal Renton Reporter Owner(s): Renton Housing Authority PO Box 2316 Renton, WA 98056 J. LAND USE ACTION APPEALS, REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION, & EXPIRATION: The Administrative Site Development Plan Review decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the decision date. Administrative Site Development Plan Approval Appeal: Appeals of the administrative site development plan review decision must be filed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 p.m. on August 15, 2011. APPEALS: An appeal of the decision(s) must be filed within the 14 -day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.8 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the $75.00 application fee to Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall - 7th Floor, (425) 430-6510. RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days of the decision date, any party may request that the decision be reopened by the approval body. The approval body may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the approval body finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14 -day appeal time frame. EXPIRATION: The Administrative Site Development Plan Review decision will expire two (2) years from the date of decision. A single two (2) year extension may be requested pursuant to RMC 4-9-2001..2. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE: provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning the land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial decision, but to Appeals to the Hearing Examiner as well. All communications after the decision/approval date must be made in writing through the Hearing Examiner. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the appeal by the Court. Site Plan Report.doc City of Renton Department of Communi+-conomic Development inistrative Site Plan Report & Decision RNA GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES LUA11-054, SA -A Report of August 2, 2011 Page 16 of 16 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: I. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits hauls hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 2. RMC section 4-4-130 provides protection measures in order to preserve and protect the two trees during utility and building construction. The trees shall be fenced around the drip line and a sign posted that the tree is to be preserved, and the location of the trees shall be indicated on all utility construction plan sheets. The fencing shall be in place prior to the issuance of any utility construction permits and shall remain until the final inspection. Water: 1. Preliminary fire flow requirement is 2,250 gpm. In order to provide adequate fire flow to serve these townhomes, extension of a 12 -inch water main will be required in Glennwood Ave NE from NE 12th (NE 12th and Harrington Ave NE) to the south property line, and stubbed to a point onsite where future extension of the water main for the other two buildings is possible. This dead end 12 -inch main will provide 2,500 gpm. Applicant will need three hydrants to serve this site. One hydrant must be within 150 feet from the structures and two additional hydrants shall be located within 300 feet of the structures. There are hydrants in the vicinity that may be counted towards fire protection; however, they must be verified to be within the required distance. 2. Individual pressure reducing valves are required downstream of each domestic water meter since static pressure from the new higher pressure water main will be above 80 psi. 3. Backflow Prevention Assembly (DCVA) will be required behind each domestic water meter for each townhome unit, for townhomes with 3 or more stories. 4. Water system development fees will be based on the size of the water meters that will serve the site. Credit will be given to existing water meter that serves the building. Fees are payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. Sewer: 1. There is an 8 -inch sewer main in Glennwood Ave NE. Sewer service will be provided to the townhomes by side sewers. Surface Water: 1. A geotechnical report for the site is required. Information on the water table and soil permeability, with recommendations of appropriate flow control BMP options with typical designs for the site from the geotechnical engineer, shall be submitted with the construction plans. Transportation: 1. Paving and trench restoration will be required to comply with the City's Trench Restoration and Overlay Requirements. General Comments: 1. A separate permit to cut and cap existing utilities to existing structures on site will be required as part of the demolition permit. Site Plan Report.doc RM -F I W10ho D5 - 04 T23N R5E W 1/2 R-8 1R 14 �l LCV L2V NE i2M 01 c c v -c 24, CV cv, iN - cv R-14 c RM - NEN q c .q-8 R- cv R-8 I L ma 8 R-811 - JI - AB R R-8 R.8- — O R. R-8 R4 ..R R j R-8 R-8 EXHIBIT I ZONING MAP BOOK F5 -16 T23N R5E W 1/2 PW TECHNICAL SERVICES PRINTED ON 11/13/09 R-8 13 0 200 400 i-55 Dk- NE 1M Bf Feet 1:4,000 R,8 NE pM El R-10 NC�F4 NE ft st -7 c7l I- RM -F C4 5NE ----ji; Ca R-8 4 E5 09 T23N R5E W 1/2 5309 -R-8 R-8 NE 1M Bf R,8 NE pM El NEMA :NF1 TR -.8 I NE 71h IN NC�F4 NE ft st -7 c7l I- RM -F C4 5NE ----ji; Ca R-8 4 E5 09 T23N R5E W 1/2 5309 ZONING MAP BOOK RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE CENTERS INDUSTRIAL Rc (RC) Resource Conservation R -t (R-1) Residential 1 du/ac ❑-+ (R-4) Residential 4 du/ac R -s (R-8) Residential 8 du/ac RmH (RMH) Residential Manufactured Homes = (R-10) Residential 10 du/ac R -t< (R-14) Residential 14 du/ac FRm-r (RM -F) Residential Multi -Family Rm- (RM -T) Residential Multi-FamllyTraditional RM -u (RM -U) Residentlal Multi -Family Urban Center m.E poc�eP.nl iE gmPhit 4f.nlOhgp, not q:mmt.eq eonea o� tn. b., ' �;io. 1- aro"ieeP.°;; .1 in: eai:.nn»n m.n M,p s W anPior P.,Po. Pny. cv (CV) Center Village uc-ei (UC -N 1) Urban Center -North 1 Ne (UC -N2) Urban Center- North 2 = (CD) Center Downtown COMMERCIAL FE -R] (COR) Commercial/Office/Residential cn (CA) Commercial Arterial ca (CO) Commercial Office cN (CN) Commerclal Neighborhood Im (IL) Industrial -Light tk (IM) Industrial-Medlum rt- (IH) Industrial -Heavy -- Renton City Limit-. ---- Adjacent- City limits RRotl PAGE PAG E# INDEX SECT/TOWN/RANGE M oa u ..i OQ j 4 —d NOT FOR COM C 0 �• r C. O O NOT FOR COM Replacement housing for Renton Hwsing Authority a m ; GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES D Z t7 co p N # _ 1 W Giennwood Ave A. NE, Panton. WA 98956 T. —00 Rep€ocemenl housing (or Renion Housing Aurhofity 'j C m �' GLENNWOOD TOWNHOMES v� o rF 1 147 Glenn>Nood Averwu NE, Renton, WA 98056 —00 C v� o A 2 m x x PA 10 ETZ 0 Replacemenl housing for Renton housing Authority GLENNWOOD WOOD T0 WNHOMES 02 0 CA Ln I � --1 1 14 7 Glenn-ood Avenue NE, Renton, WA 98056 10 ETZ 0 CLH DCl18 WA .0040 { I 1H MTV :bus ! -.Ax LU sq �X- IS alLO a�`' a�"' W ai cpm ol 7 N °3 z i 14 I E m 403 O I�O y m3l �n x s c xa wa� ¢ � qpU x N% U a v F� I� i� i w z ujr zi W U 4 K a � O I{IL i Z O N a 3I Z I z z 0 �I c� I z i p i}j{ wa I w W fNll T 0 v T H W O v T H W 1 � 1 0 O LJ _ ❑_ C O �'��J7��}�}j rr�l •� ,V LIU (U CL ZOE ITH ELEVATION 7. Z6P // EXHIBIT 7 W Q T l� . co 2 x W i 'd' LO 0 VL a J uL o z y z a A � SCCD Qi 0 a ir u) um iu.amen upal.:! ¢ man v CI I ... .. � ... . rX V i DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY D City of nn AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMO APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA 11-054, SA -A APPLICANT: City of Renton and Renton Housing Authority PROJECT NAME: RHA Glennwood Townhomes DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review for the construction of two (2) multi -family structures containing 4-townhome units each. The subject property is located between Edmonds Ave NE and Glenwood Ave NE just north of Sunset Blvd NE. The project site totals 0.65 acres in area and is zoned Resesidential-14 (R-14). LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1147 Glennwood Ave NE LEAD AGENCY/RESPONSIBLE ENTITY: City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development Upon determination by the City's Environmental Review Committee that the proposal meets the criteria outlined in the Planned Action Ordinance (Ordinance #5610) and qualifies as a planned action, the proposal shall not require a SEPA threshold determination, preparation of an EIS, or be subject to further review pursuant to SEPA. The City's Environmental Review Committee designates the proposal as a "planned action", pursuant to RCQ 43.21C.030, as it meets all of the following conditions: ✓ The proposal is located within the Sunset Planned Action Area. ✓ The proposed uses and activities are consistent with those described in the Planned Action EIS and Planned Action Qualifications. ✓ The proposal is within the Planned Action thresholds and other criteria of the Planned Action Qualifications. ✓ The proposal is consistent with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan and applicable zoning regulations. ✓ The proposal's significant adverse environmental impacts have been identified in the Planned Action EIS. ✓ The proposal's impacts have been mitigated by application of the measures identified in Attachment B of Ordinance#5160, and other applicable City regulations, together with any modifications or variances or special permits that may be required. EXHIBIT 10 City of Renton Department of Community o, economic Development RHA Glennwood Townhomes August 1, 2011 tronmental Review Committee Memo LUA11-054, SA -A, LC Page 2 of 2 ✓ The proposal complies with all applicable local, state and/or federal laws and regulations, and the Environmental Review Committee determines that these. constitute adequate mitigation. ✓ The proposal is not an essential public facility as defined by RCW.36.70A.200(1). SIGNATURES; eb/I J)l Gregg Zim fr;ma,Admir nistrator Date Public Workpartment Mark Peterson,fAdministrator Fire & Emergency Services -i/ 7 Dat Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Date Alex ietsch, Administrator Date Community Services Department Department of Community & Economic Development 0 ICF INTIKKAYMNAL EXHIBIT 11 Attachment A Planned Action Study Area set Area Community Planned Action Final NEPA/SEPA EIS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY D City of AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT jO 8 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMO APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA 11-054, SA -A APPLICANT: City of Renton and Renton Housing Authority PROJECT NAME: RHA Glennwood Townhomes DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review for the construction of two (2) multi -family structures containing 4-townhome units each. The subject property is located between Edmonds Ave NE and Glenwood Ave NE just north of Sunset Blvd NE. The project site totals 0.65 acres in area and is zoned Resesidential-14 (R-14). LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1147 Glennwood Ave NE LEAD AGENCY/RESPONSIBLE ENTITY: City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development Upon determination by the City's Environmental Review Committee that the proposal meets the criteria outlined in the Planned Action Ordinance (Ordinance #5610) and qualifies as a planned action, the proposal shall not require a SEPA threshold determination, preparation of an EIS, or be subject to further review pursuant to SEPA. The City's Environmental Review Committee designates the proposal as a "planned action", pursuant to RCQ 43.210.030, as it meets all of the following conditions: ✓ The proposal is located within the Sunset Planned Action Area. ✓ The proposed uses and activities are consistent with those described in the Planned Action EIS and Planned Action Qualifications. ✓ The proposal is within the Planned Action thresholds and other criteria of the Planned Action Qualifications. ✓ The proposal is consistent with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan and applicable zoning regulations. ✓ . The proposal's significant adverse environmental impacts have been identified in the Planned Action EIS. ✓ The proposal's impacts have been mitigated by application of the measures identified in Attachment B of Ordinance#5160, and other applicable City regulations, together with any modifications or variances or special permits that may be required. City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development RHA Glennwood Townhomes August 1, 2011 4) Environmental Review Committee Memo LUA11-054, SA -A, LC Page 2 of 2 ✓ The proposal complies with all applicable local, state and/or federal laws and regulations, and the Environmental Review Committee determines that these constitute adequate mitigation. ✓ The proposal is not an essential public facility as defined by RCW.36.70A.200(1). SIGNATURES: eblli 1 Gregg Zim ��pment dm nistrator Date Mark Peterson, Administrator Dat pf Public Work Fire & Emergency Services Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Date Alex ietsch, Administrator Date Community Services Department Department of Community & Economic Development DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: July 18, 2011 TO: Rocale Timmons, Planner FROM: Jan Illian, Plan Review SUBJECT: RHA Glenwood Townhomes 421— Union Ave NE LUA 11-054, SA -A I have reviewed the application for the RHA Glenwood Townhomes, located at 1147 Glenwood Ave NE, and have the following Utility and Transportation comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER There is an existing 6 -inch cast iron water main in Glenwood Ave NE. Available fire flow is 1,500 gpm. The development/site is currently within the City 435 -hydraulic water pressure zone. The approximate static water pressure at street level elevation (346 ft) is 38 psi. A %-inch domestic meter serves the existing building. SEWER There is an 8 -inch gravity sewer main in Glenwood Ave NE. STORM There is no storm conveyance system in Glenwood Ave NE. STREETS There are no street frontage improvements in Glenwood Ave NE. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. Preliminary fire flow requirement is 2,250 gpm. In order to provide adequate fire flow to serve these townhomes, extension of a 12 -inch water main will be required in Glenwood Ave NE from NE 12th (NE 12th and Harrington Ave NE) to the south property line, and stubbed to a point onsite where future extension of the water main for the other two buildings is possible. This dead end 12 -inch main will provide 2,500 gpm. Applicant will need three hydrants to serve this site. One hydrant must be within 150 feet from the structures and two additional hydrants shall be located within 300 feet of the structures. There are hydrants in the vicinity that may be counted towards fire protection; however, they must be verified to be within the required distance. 2. individual pressure reducing valves are required downstream of each domestic water meter since static pressure from the new higher pressure water main will be above 80 psi. H10ED/Planning/Current Planning/PROJECrS/11-054.Rocale/Plan Review Comments LUA 11-054.doc • RHA Glenwood Townhomes LUA 11-0. Page 2 of 3 July 18, 2011 3. A Backflow Prevention Assembly (DCVA) will be required behind each domestic water meter for each townhome unit, for townhomes with 3 or more stories. 4. Water system development fees will be based on the size of the water meters that will serve the site. Credit will be given to existing water meter that serves the building. Fees are payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. SANITARY SEWER 1. There is an 8 -inch sewer main in Glenwood Ave NE. Sewer service will be provided to the townhomes by side sewers. 2. Sewer system development fees will be based on the size of the domestic water(s). Credit will be given for the existing %-inch meter. Fees are payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. SURFACE WATER 1. Surface water system development fees will be based on the square footage of the new impervious surface area. The rate is $.405 x the new square footage after final design. Fees are payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. 2. A drainage plan and drainage report has been submitted with the site plan application. The report shows preliminary compliance with 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWM, Chapters 1 and 2 subject to engineering review with the construction plans. All core and six special requirements are contained in the report. Based on the City's flow control map, this site falls within the Peak Rate Flow Control Standard, Existing Site Conditions. The drainage report discusses meeting the area specific flow control requirement under Core Requirement #3. Installation of a detention tank and a storm filter cartridge system are proposed in the report. 3. A geotechnical report for the site is required. Information on the water table and soil permeability, with recommendations of appropriate flow control BMP options with typical designs for the site from the geotechnical engineer, shall be submitted with the construction plans. 4. A Construction Stormwater General Permit from the Department of Ecology is required if clearing and grading of the site exceeds one acre. TRANSPORTATIONATREET 1. Transportation mitigation fees of $2,992.50 will be accessed. Credit has been given for the existing building. The rate is $75.00 x 39.9 trips. See Transportation Mitigation Fee sheet included. 2. Frontage improvements are required to be constructed in the right-of-way fronting the site in Glenwood Ave NE. Existing right-of-way width in Glenwood is 50 feet. To meet the city's complete streets standard, half -street improvements including 13 feet of pavement from the centerline, a 5 -foot sidewalk, and an 8 -foot planter strip are required. One foot will be required to be dedicated to the City for right-of-way. This will allow for a 26 -foot half street. 3. Paving and trench restoration will comply with the City's Trench Restoration and Overlay Requirements. 4. Street lighting is required to be installed along the frontage in Glenwood Ave NE. H:/CED/Planning/Current Planning/PROJECTS/11-054.Rocale/Plan Review Comments LUA 11-054.doc r` + RHA Glenwood Townhomes LUA 11 -0 - Page 3 of 3 July 18, 2011 GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Separate permits and fees for side sewer connection, domestic water meter and landscape irrigation meter installation, storm connection, and any backflow devices will be required. 2. A separate permit to cut and cap existing utilities to existing structures on site will be required as part of the demolition permit. H:/CED/Planning/Current Planning/PROJECTS/11-054.Rocale/Plan Review Comments LUA 11-054.doc City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Probable Probable More Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary COMMENTS DUE: JULY 15, 2011 APPLICATION NO: WA11-054, SA -A, LOT COMBINATION DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 1, 2011 CiT'Y Cl = RZIEt111'0N APPLICANT: Joel Ing, Shelter Resources, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons JULA . ? i PROJECT TITLE: R»A Glennwood Townhomes PROJECT REVIEWER: Jan Illian Animals SITE AREA: 0.65 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 0 square feet�� LOCATION: 1147 Glennwood Avenue NE PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 11,560 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review for the construction two multi -family structures containing 4-townhome units each. Environmental review was conducted as part of the Sunset Area Planned Action EIS (LUA10-052). The subject property consists of two parcels, which would be consolidated as part of the proposal, located between Edmonds Ave NE and Glenwood Ave NE just north of Sunset Blvd NE. The project site totals 0.65 acres in area and is zoned Resesidential-14 (R-14). Surface parking, in the amount of 13 stalls, is being proposed on the southwestern portion of the site with open space to the north of the parking Access to the site is proposed via a curb cut along Glenwood Ave NE. There is an exisiting duplex located on site which is proposed for removal. The proposed site is located within Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection area. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Probable More Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li ht Glare Recreation utilities Transportation Public Services Histori cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 feet C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS SES We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi I information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Dir or Authorized Representative Date �E S# 881 TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION FEE Project Name: Project Address: Contact Person: Permit Number: Project Description: Land Use Type: X Residential ❑ Retail ❑ Non -retail Calculation: 8 x 6.65 = 53.2 ADT 2 x 6.65 = 13.3 ADT credit 53.2 - 13.3 = 39.9 ADT 39.9 x $75 = $2,992.50 Transportation Mitigation Fee: Calculated by: Date of Payment: RHA Glennwood Townhomes 1147 Glennwood Ave NE Joel Ing, LUA11-054 8 -unit Townhouses on parcel Existing duplex to be removed Method of Calculation: X ITE Trip Generation Manual, 81h Edition ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Other (220) Apt 6.65/DU $2,992.50 K. Kittrick Date: 7/11/2011 (D City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING :Ian'or)COMMENTS DUE: JULY 15, 201 p _NT SERVICE APPLICATION NO: LUA11-054, SA -A, LOT COMBINATION DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 1, 2011 CITY OF RENT APPLICANT: Joel Ing, Shelter Resources, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons JUL 0 5 2011 PROJECT TITLE: RNA Glennwood Townhomes PROJECT REVIEWER: Jan Illian SITE AREA. 0.65 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 0 square feet LOCATION: 1147 Glennwood Avenue NE I PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 11,560 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review for the construction two multi -family structures containing 4-townhome units each. Environmental review was conducted as part of the Sunset Area Planned Action EIS (LUA1O-052). The subject property consists of two parcels, which would be consolidated as part of the proposal, located between Edmonds Ave NE and Glenwood Ave NE just north of Sunset Blvd NE. The project site totals 0.65 acres in area and is zoned Resesidential-14 (R-14). Surface parking, in the amount of 13 stalls, is being proposed on the southwestern portion of the site with open space to the north of the parking Access to the site is proposed via a curb cut along Glenwood Ave NE. There is an exisiting duplex located on site which is proposed for removal. The proposed site is located within Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection area. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land Shoreline Use Animals Envlmnmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources SEE _rpf 5R66_r ,& 881 ,,�26 `]//I I�,o i B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Impacts impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li ht Glare Recreation utilities Transportation Public Services HistoriclCultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 61 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pc[ Kr5 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 15, 2011 APPLICATION NO: LUA11-054, SA -A, LOT COMBINATION DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 1, 2011 APPLICANT: Joel Ing, Shelter Resources, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: RHA Glen nwood Town homes PROJECT REVIEWER: Jan lllian M08 Z!` 0 1 SITE AREA: 0.65 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 0 square feeVJ LOCATION: 1147 Glennwood Avenue NE PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 11,560 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review for the construction two multi -family structures containing 4-townhome units each. Environmental review was conducted as part of the Sunset Area Planned Action EIS (LUA10-052). The subject property consists of two parcels, which would be consolidated as part of the proposal, located between Edmonds Ave NE and Glenwood Ave NE just north of Sunset Blvd NE. The project site totals 0.65 acres in area and is zoned Resesidential-14 (R-14). Surface parking, in the amount of 13 stalls, is being proposed on the southwestern portion of the site with open space to the north of the parking Access to the site is proposed via a curb cut along Glenwood Ave NE. There is an exisiting duplex located on site which is proposed for removal. The proposed site is located within Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection area. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Ll ht Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet / •/ •� i/ Poe • ! B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS A /X77 C. V CODE -RELATED COMMENTS 11 ic,.. - We have reviewed this application with particular attention t6 those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional infyrg►ation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Ik a 4.& - of Director or Authorized Representative Date Zvo U)" 4W, -YAP- 0'7' i' Leslie A Betlach From: Joel Ing [Joeli@shelterresourcesine.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 2:04 PM To: Rocale Timmons Cc: Mark R. Gropper (mrg@rentonhousing.org); Leslie A Betlach; Chip Vincent; Mark Santos - Johnson Subject: RE: Glenwood Project Attachments: Flyer for KaBOOMI.docx Rocale I think one risk with waiting for the playground, is that it could take a bit of time before the park is built after the project is completed, and part of our project description to King County states we will include a playground at the site. Further, we are hoping we can use a program called KaBOOM which is a nonprofit which provides free equipment at the property (see attached). If things do change related to timing of the park, we can discuss this further. Thanks for checking in. Joel Joel Ing Shelter Resources, Inc. 2223112th Avenue NE, Suite 102 Bellevue, WA 98004 (425) 454-8205 w (425) 455-8546 f From: Rocale Timmons fmailto:RTimmons(aRentonwa.novl Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 1:52 PM To: Joel Ing Cc: Mark R. Gropper (mrclarentonhousina.org); Leslie A Betlach; Chip Vincent; Mark Santos -Johnson Subject: Glenwood Project Hello Joel, I just got through speaking with Leslie from our Parks Department and she raised a good point. As part of the proposal there is a playground located on site and we were wonder would the investment into a play area be directed to the larger park which is in such close proximity? It is the Parks Department preference that a fee -in -lieu be paid instead of providing the small play area on site. What are your thoughts? Rocale Timmons City of Renton - Current Planning Associate Planner 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Tel: (425) 430-7219 Fax: (425) 430-7300 rtimmons@rentonwa.gov 0,0 ro 4 i✓ n c � f� C G 7 c c m• n O O -C j G Qf � o� Z CL N w- O U) O C c O ZCD.0 �3 .N. CT N N n c v D 73 J ¢� CL CD C NO ,.z•, X L 0 C? U O �i a r 7 - a3 n C w C O 0 E a cO 0 a`) Ei40 a W m amu 0 U r U � q (t1 N � Q C C E E UCL O N N � � a a = N � � U Z 10 z N m waw O c C a LJ, 0 r>� C a acra- � U C L r.+ N � � C N Ln (n LLJ LL. Q) - 0CD CD $ ro m CL .. c ' O E o R N S � C O • ��o 0 Q CL U. o (V ro Q) —CL G m 0NN d � O N C C CO m Q U) c 0)-a w a a u3 m c � o a t � — L) cn fll C C C C 7 Com. U] c pe) � U) 7� 0 =3 ".•' N � = N in O a E L _ O N O t> a •�- C C U CL a'0 M Q1 ; C (D LU � ,O7 Co C p �^ I �� � C? CA Y m n ` �M -0 '° T a c -0 c C p C E m Q) 'ro> Q) Ero,-('�4' G -a CL c ro o m O j >(D a) o m C e 'G O -2 OL -5 O U) G (D M 'c Ln Q 6. 6.ro °J CT Q1 (D 00 CD N D (O C � Y r+ C N n. d M O N N N O (D (D O O O co 00 tl Q M Y) Y (ti CL C7 N M m O CCS a.C) '� V O d' �' c0 O1 M co o Ln Lf) Ca CD 0 0 CD o a o 0 0 u') LO LO o CD V) O m N O O O O O 0 0 0 C) O N N N (D (.O O ('7 C7 0 0 (O 0 (D 0 00 LO CD 0 Cl) co OD OD 11) N N r- r- CD U 113 L N ti ti ti (` u) 16 6 5 � U N N N N N a L" ar 02 k` 1E� a L U U c 0 E E d 0 v, C 7 N Q)) U1 w .� 5 w CUE E p C C_ O 0 0 0 O E a O in Ll 3 LU 0 _ro _ o m m a) 0 LL 0 _0 r I° r° I° > W- LC, f LL LL LL U ?. U p1 �_, �_, �_ _� �_, _7 _� . E r E E '~ E E E E E E E N »° fa (a (p (a ro ". lL (a c,3 ca (u sa m ca p a co c 3 O C N M �r w'i CD !�• O U') CO 1- 00 CO r (9 ro y- •r r r y- �-^ 0,0 ro 4 i✓ n c � f� C G 7 c c m• n O O -C j G Qf � o� Z CL N w- O U) O C c O ZCD.0 �3 .N. CT N N n c v D 73 J ¢� CL CD C NO ,.z•, X L 0 C? U O �i a r 7 - a3 n C w C O 0 E a cO 0 a`) Ei40 a W m amu 0 U r U � q (t1 N � Q C C E E UCL O N N � � a a = N � � U Z 10 z N m waw O c C a LJ, 0 r>� C a acra- � U C L r.+ N � � C N Ln (n LLJ LL. s Q) - U C ro m CL .. c ' O E o n O N S � C O • � Q ^O, W o (V ro Q) —CL G m ..0 d � N C C CO m Q U) c 0)-a w a a u3 m c � o a t � — L) cn fll C C C C 7 Com. U] c pe) � U) 7� 0 =3 ".•' N � = N in O a E L _ O N O t> a •�- C C U �- W1 w L a'0 M Q1 ; C (D LU � ,O7 Co C p �^ I �� � C? CA Y m n ` �M -0 '° T m O c -0 c C p C E m Q) 'ro> Q) Ero,-('�4' G -a CL c ro o m 0 (mil c- 0 a) j >(D a) o m C e 'G O -2 OL -5 O U) G (D M 'c Ln Q 6. 6.ro °J m o - L � X (D r d m r Ll (1) m Q1 ., a) O a a... Q L 0- CL O � L s C City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: JULY 15, 2011 DEVELOPMENT SERVI APPLICATION NO: LUA11-054, 5A -A, LOT COMBINATION DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 1, 2011 APPLICANT: Joel Ing, Shelter Resources, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: RMA Glennwood Townhomes PROJECT REVIEWER: Jan Illian IRECEIVEE SITE AREA: 0.65 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (grass): 0 square feet LOCATION: 1147 Glennwood Avenue NE PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 11,560 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review for the construction two multi -family structures containing 4-townhome units each. Environmental review was conducted as part of the Sunset Area Planned Action EIS (LUA10-052). The subject property consists of two parcels, which would be consolidated as part of the proposal, located between Edmonds Ave NE and Glenwood Ave NE just north of Sunset Blvd NE. The project site totals 0.65 acres in area and is zoned Resesidential-14 (R-14). Surface parking, in the amount of 13 stalls, is being proposed on the southwestern portion of the site with open space to the north of the parking Access to the site is proposed via a curb cut along Glenwood Ave NE. There is an exisiting duplex located on site which is proposed for removal. The proposed site is located within Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection area. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS CES. Element of the Environment Probable Probable Minor Major Impacts impacts More information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li ht Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public 5ervices Histori Cultural Preserva tion Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14 000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areaCwre dditional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. T 7 /7 Signature of Dire r or Authorized Representa a Date DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTOR FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM July 6, 2011 Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector Comments for Renton Housing Authority on Glenwood Ave NE Environmental Impact Comments: Fire mitigation impact fees are applicable at the current rate of $388.00 per multi -family unit. This fee is paid at time of building permit issuance. Code Related Comments: The preliminary fire flow is 1,750 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required. One within 150 -feet and one within 300 -feet of the buildings. Existing water mains cannot supply the necessary fire flow and will need to be replaced. 2. Approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems are required throughout the buildings. Separate plans and permits required by the fire department. Direct outside access is required to the fire sprinkler riser rooms. Fully addressable and full detection is required for the fire alarm systems. 3. Fire department apparatus access roadways are required within 150 -feet of all points on the building. Fire lane signage required for the on site roadway. Required turning radius are 25 -feet inside and 45 -feet outside. Roadways shall be a minimum of 20 -feet wide. Maximum grade on roadways is 15%. Roadways shall support a minimum of a 30 -ton vehicle and 322 -psi point loading. 4. An electronic site plan is required prior to occupancy for pre -fire planning purposes. See attached sheet for the format in which to submit your plans. CT:ct RHA3 Denton Fire Department PRE -FIRE PLANNING In an effort to streamline our pre -tire process, we are requesting tliat you submit a site plan of your constriction project in one of the following formats which we can then convert to V[SIO.vsd. This is required to be submitted prior to occupancy. ABC Flowcharter.aO A13C Flowcharter.af2 Adobe Illustrator File.ai AutoCad Drawin g.dw Autocad Drawin A fn Computer Graphics Metahle.c rn Corel Cli art Format.cmx Core] DRAW! Drawing File Format.edr Core] Flow.cfl Encapsulated Postscript File.e s Enhanced Metafile.emf IGES Drawing File Format.i Ts Graphics Interchange Formal. if Macintosh PICT Format. ct Micro Vrafx Desi finer Ver 3.I.drw \Micro grafx Designer Ver 6.0.dsf Microslation Drawin A =n Portable Network Graphics Format. of Postscript File. s Ta g lnta Te File Format.tif Text.txt Text.csv VISIO.vsd Windows 13itma .bm Windows 13itma .dib Windows Metafile.wmf Zsoft PC Paintbrush I3itma ex City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ' P r c, COMMENTS DUE: JULY 15, 2011 APPLICATION NO: LUA11-054, SA -A, LOT COMBINATION DATE -CIRCULATED: JULY 1, 2011 APPLICANT: Joel Ing, Shelter Resources; Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: RHA Glennwood Townhomes PROJECT REVIEWER: Jan Illian SITE AREA: 0.65 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 0 square feet LOCATION: 1147 Glennwood Avenue NE PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 11,560 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review for the construction two multi -family structures containing 4-townhome units each. Environmental review was conducted as part of the Sunset Area Planned Action EIS (LUA10-052). The subject property consists of two parcels, which would be consolidated as part of the proposal, located between Edmonds Ave NE and Glenwood Ave NE just north of Sunset Blvd NE. The project site totals 0.65 acres in area and is zoned Resesidential-14 (R-14). Surface parking, in the amount of 13 stalls, Is being proposed on the southwestern portion of the site with open space to the north of the parking Access to the site is proposed via a curb cut along Glenwood Ave NE. There is an exisiting duplex located on site which is proposed for removal. The proposed site is located within Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection area. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Lf ht Glare Recreation utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet p�2 a, 9—aJteJ C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS .SGP G( C �ej We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to proaerly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Re 6Lll Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pr COMMENTS DUE: JULY 15, 2011 APPLICATION NO: LUA11-054, SA -A, LOT COM iNATION DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 1, 2011 APPLICANT: Joel Ing, Shelter Resources, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: RHA Glennwood Townhomes PROJECT REVIEWER: Jan Illian SITE AREA: 0.65 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 0 square feet LOCATION: 1147 Glennwood Avenue NE PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 11,560 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review for the construction two multi -family structures containing 4-townhome units each. Environmental review was conducted as part of the Sunset Area Planned Action EIS (LUA10-052). The subject property consists of two parcels, which would be consolidated as part of the proposal, located between Edmonds Ave NE and Glenwood Ave NE just north of Sunset Blvd NE. The project site totals 0.65 acres in area and is zoned Resesidential-14 (R-14). Surface parking, in the amount of 13 stalls, is being proposed on the southwestern portion of the site with open space to the north of the parking Access to the site is proposed via a curb cut along Glenwood Ave NE. There is an exisiting duplex located on site which is proposed for removal. The proposed site is located within Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection area, A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land Shoreline use Animals Environmental Health Energy Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Lf ht Glare Recreation utilities Transportation Public Services HistariclCultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14 000 Feet C. CODE-RE4 TED COMMENTS l _ Ar 4'4C�4 ova, rv,ct 7 k,-,% �7 C_ V" s T0 S���x 'r11 d , �G J� ,c We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas w.herrodditional informatian.is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Dir'ettor or Authorized Represe - S Zo�l Date r', c� -� `5 B'U'S` J7�.7��Q-Cy.l.l e.. �� v` 41--x- l 1 ---C- V R4 1I r Denis Law Mayor July 1, 2011 .City of e 1 Department of Community and -Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator uepartmenz OT i ransportazion Renton School District 420 Park Avenue N Renton, WA 98055 Subject: RHA Glennwood Townhomes LUA11-054, SA -A, Lot Combination The City of Renton's Department of Community and Economic Development (CED) has received an application for the construction two multi -family structures, containing 4- townhome units each, located at 1147 Glennwood Avenue NE. Please see the enclosed Notice of Application for further details: , In order to process this application, CED needs to know which Renton schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Please fill in tfie'appropriate schools-on-the"list'below and,return this -letter to-my:attention; City -of . Renton, CED, Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98057 by July 15, 2011. Elementary School: Middle'School: 11 High School: Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle the impact of the additional students estimated to come from the proposed development? Yes V No Any Comments: Renton.City Hall a 1055 South Grady Way 9 Renton, Washington 08057 •• rentonti va.gov.. Nancy Rawls Page 2 of 2 July 1, 2011 Thank you for providing this important information. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely, Roca Timmons Ass ciate Planner Enclosure. t'Jy of '.tip T•.-. .�: ti � �� J' � _ City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATIO PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: Renton Housing Authority ADDRESS: 2900 NE 10th Street PO Box 2316 CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98056 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-226-1850 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: Joel Ing COMPANY (if applicable): Shelter Resources, Inc. ADDRESS: 2223 112th Avenue NE, Suite 102 CITY: Bellevue, WA Zip: 98004 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-454-8205 CONTACT PERSON NAME: Guy Peckham COMPANY (if applicable): Bumgardner Architects ADDRESS: 2111 Third Avenue CITY: Seattle, WA Zip: 98121 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: 206-223-1361 guyp@bumgardner.biz 4 -u4 -i -c; r( Winton ing Division JUN 3 0 2011 PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: RHA Glennwood Townhomes PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 1147 Glennwood Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): North Parcel: #7227801375 and South Parcel: #7227801380 EXISTING LAND USE(S): North Parcel: Vacant. South Parcel: Existing duplex. PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Townhomes EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: CV — Center Village PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable) NA (to remain the same) EXISTING ZONING: R-14 Residential —14 Dwelling Units per Net Acre PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): NA to remain the same SITE AREA (in square feet): 28,484 sf (existing); 27,484 sf (after 5' frontage dedication) SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: 1,000 sf SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: NA PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable) 12.7 DU/acre NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) 2 existing parcels to be combined into 1 lot. NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 8 new dwelling units (Note: existing duplex to be demolished C:1Documents and Settingslmrg.RHAlLocal SettingATemporary Internet I=ileslContent.Outlook1Y8L8C8S41LU Master Applicationol 06-24-3 I.doc - I - PRECT INFORMA7 NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 1 existing duplex (2 DU) to be demolished SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): Approximately 11,560 sf SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NA NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): NA rrf TION contiiffed PROJECT VALUE: The project estimated construction cost is $1.72 million. IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): NA ❑ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES sq. ft. ❑ WETLANDS sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION , TOWNSHIP , RANGE , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 10�s T ♦ lo fil" qZ (sAt4t.) AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s)! , declare under penalty of perjury uner the laws of the State of Washington that I am (please check on4 the current owner of the property involved in this application or V the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 21Site �01I Signature of Owner/Rresent ve Date Signature of Owner/Representative Date STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that . Mark Gro p jeer signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her/their free and volunta ct for the uses and purpose mentioned in the instrument. Dated ttE� '; (fin=_ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington T T SAA � Notary (Print): 16adgmr ICO PUBoo �' O My appointment expires:Ora N -- O W ASy��tt CaDocuments and Settingslmrg.RHATocal ScuingsUemporary Internet FileslContent.Outlook1Y8t.8C8S41LU Master Applicatian0l 06-24-1 Ldoc - 2 - LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION , TOWNSHIP , RANGE , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 10�s T ♦ lo fil" qZ (sAt4t.) AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s)! , declare under penalty of perjury uner the laws of the State of Washington that I am (please check on4 the current owner of the property involved in this application or V the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 21Site �01I Signature of Owner/Rresent ve Date Signature of Owner/Representative Date STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that . Mark Gro p jeer signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her/their free and volunta ct for the uses and purpose mentioned in the instrument. Dated ttE� '; (fin=_ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington T T SAA � Notary (Print): 16adgmr ICO PUBoo �' O My appointment expires:Ora N -- O W ASy��tt CaDocuments and Settingslmrg.RHATocal ScuingsUemporary Internet FileslContent.Outlook1Y8t.8C8S41LU Master Applicatian0l 06-24-1 Ldoc - 2 - ' EXHIBIT "A" i Lot 9, Block 42, Corrected Plat, Renton Highlands No. 2, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 57 of Plats, page 92, records of King County, Washington. SITUATE in the County of King, State of Washington. ABBREVIATED LEGAL Lot 9, Bilk. 2, Corrected Plat, Renton Highlands No., Vol. 57, P. 92 ;16 Yz Tax Account No. 722780-1375-00 END OF EXHIBIT "A" 5228000170 Page 2 rM t"cf�Lllr1�11Aiik{11'f#'�S�I'S)fti11rl�il}('iiti7f:t1FP ✓ WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO HOUSING AUTHORITY OFTHE CITY OF RENTON P.O.BOX23tE RENTON. WASHINGTON DOM © CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1297971 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED THEGRANTOR(S) THOIdAS J. DALPAY, ASKS SEPARATE ESTATE j fur and 1n cansidcratinn of i TEN DOLLARS AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION In hand paid, almvp and warrants to HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OR RENTON Ithe rullrAving described real estate sitautcd in the (;DUnty of KING state of %vashington: LOT 10, BLOCK 4$ CORRECTED PLAT OF RENTON HIGHLANDS NO, 2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 57 OF pLATB, PAGE(S) 82 THRDL)GH 99, WCLUSNE, W KIND COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SUBJECT TO: EXCEPTIONS SET FORTH ONATTACHED EXHIBIT A' AND BY TH13 REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOFAS IF FULLY WCORPOWITED HEREIN. Tax Account Numbor(s): 722700-13BO-03 Bated: DECEMBER 15, 2009 0 0 THOMAS J. DALPAY LPSIOIKLC/052008 09 -//l(/ (;-4m�.PkF . CitY of Renton ., Division PREAPPLICA'TION MEETING FOR Planning' WORKFORCE HOUSING PROJECT PREAPP 1147 GLENNWOOD AVE NE E(DEOVED CITY OF RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Current Planning Division PRET 0-047 March 10; 2011 .of Contact Information: Planner Rocale Timmons Phone: 425.430.7219 Public Works Reviewer: Jan Ililan Phone: 425.430.7216 Fire Prevention Reviewer: Dave Pargas Phone: 425.430.7023 ;Building Department Reviewer: Craig Bunnell Phone: 425.430.7290 Please retain this packet, throughout the course of your project as a reference. -,Consider giving copies of It to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work on the project. You will need to submit atopy of this packet. when you apply for land use and/or environmental .permits. Pre-screening: When you have the -project application ready for submittal, call and schedule an appointment with the. project manager. to have it pre-screened before making all of the required copies.. The pre -application meeting is Informal and non-binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies In effect at the time of revlew. The applicant Is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations In effect at the time of project submittal. The Information contained In this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision -makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Development Services Director, Department of Community and Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator and City Council). 4 V11 baa .. •. fir..: CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: March 10, 2011 TO: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Pians Review Inspector SUBJECT: Preliminary Comments for Renton Housing Authority on Glenwood 1. The preliminary fire flow Is 2,250 gpm Three fire hydrants are required. One within 150 -feet and two within 300 -feet of.the buildings. Fire flows exceeding 2,500 gpm require a looped fire main around the buildings. An existing hydrants used to satisfy the requirements shall meet current fire code Including 5 -inch storz fittings. 2. Fire mitigation Impact fees are applicable at the current rate of $388.00 per multi -family unit. This fee is paid at time of building permit Issuance. 3. Approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems are required throughout the building. Separate plans and permits required by the fire department. direct outside access Is required to the fire spdrilder riser room. Fully addressable and full detection is required for tho fire alarm system. 4. Fite department apparatus access roadways are required within 150 -feet of all points on the Wilding. Fire lane slgnaga required for the on site roadway. Required turning radius are 26 --feet Inside and 45 -feet outside. Roadways shall be a minimum of 20 -feet wide. Maximum grade on roadways Is 15%. Roadways shall support a minimum of a 30 -ton vehicle and 322 -psi point loading. 5. An electronic site plan IS reguired prior to occupancy for pre -fire planning purposes. See attached sheet for the format In which to submit your pians. MCI RFW3 QgVr4� , Renton Fire D ep artament PRE-FME PL C- bn an effort to st mmmliaa our p v fma procem we are requesting that you submit a site plan of your Mubmc ion proj eat in one of the, following formats which wo caa than coavat to VISI0.vsd. This is required to be submitted prior to occupancy. ABC FlowcharW.afl ABC Flovvrbarter.af 2 Adobe Musttator Filaei Autocad DrawImAwg Autocad Dra gmmma gepwcs MetaSle. Caasl Format.aax Cbi+al DRAWI Dmwm �& Fila Fomat.adr Corel Flow -oft hibod Po Fr7a. Eahancod Meft tile.emf It3ES Drawlag Fla Fomat-la hits a FO=Rtdf IVIACh t A PICT Format. Ver 3.Ldrw IviisroDefter Ver 6.0,4sf mWostetion Portable Hatwork 0mpWcs FmmatMf Posbcript Mps Rahn File Format.tif Taxud Teamay . VMO.vsd Windows B . Windows B dlb Windows McUM&vanf Zma PC Paintbrush Bi DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: March 9, 2011 TO: Rocale Timmons, Planner FROM: Jan Illian, Plan Review Q� SUBJECT: RHA Townhomes Project 1132 —Edmonds Ave NE PRE 10-047 NOTE: The applicant is cautioned that information contained In this summary Is preliminary and non- binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by offldal city dedsion-makers. Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. I have completed a preliminary review for the above -referenced proposal. The following comments are based on the pre -application submittal made to the qty of Renton by the applicant. water 1. There Is an existing 64nch cast Iron water main in Glenwood Ave NE. Available fire flow Is 1,500 gpm. The development/site Is currently within the City 435 -hydraulic water presspre zone. The approximate static water pressure at street level elevation (346 ft) Is 38 psi. 2. Preliminary fire flow requirement Is 2,250 gprn. Irl order to provide adequate fire flow to serve these townhomes, extension of a 12 -Inch water main will be required in Glenwood Ave NE from NE 12'" (NE 12ei and Harrington Ave NE) to the south property line and stubbed to a pbint onsite where future extension of the water main for the other two buildings Is possible. The dead end 12 -Inch main will provide 2,500 gpm. 3. Three fire'hydrants will be required to serve this site. One hydrant must be within 150 feet from the structures and two additional hydrants shall be located within 300 feet of the structures. There are hydrants In the vicinity that may be counted towards fire protection; however they must be verified to be within the required distance. 4. Any existing hydrants to be counted as fire protection will be required to be retrofitted with a 5 - Inch quick disconnect Storz fitting if not currently equipped. 5. Landscape Irrigation systems will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device Is required to be installed. A plumbing permit will be -required. RHA Townhomes—PRE 10-047 Page.2 of 3 March 9, 2011 6. Water system development fees will be based on the size of the domestic water meter(s) and Irrigation meter(s). Credit will be given for existing meters. This Is payable prior to issuance of the construction permlt. See fee schedule attached. 7.• individual pressure reducing valve required downstream of each domestic water meter since static pressure from the new higher pressure water main will be above 80 psi. 8. A Backflow Prevention Assembly (DNA) will be required behind each domestic water meter for each townhome unit, for townhomes with 3 or more stories. 1.- There is an 8 -Inch sewer main in Glenwood Ave NE. Sewer service will be provided to the townhomes by side sewer connections. 2. Sewer system development fees Will be based on the size of the domestic waters to serve the site. Credit will be given for existing meters. This Is payable prior to Issuance of the construction permit. See fee schedule attached. Storm Z. There Is no existing storm system in Glenwood Ave NE. 2. A drainage plan and drainage report will be required with the site plan application in compliance with the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and qty of Renton Amendments to the KCSWM, Chapters 1 and 2 as adopted. All core and any special requirements shall be contained In the report. All core and any special requirements shall be contained In the report. Based on the City's flow control map, this site falls within the Peak Rate Flow Control Standard, Existing Site Conditions. The drainage report will need to follow the area specific flow control requirements under Core Requirement N. 3. A geotechnical report for the site Is required. Information on the water table and soil permeability with recommendations of appropriate flow control BMP options with typical designs for the site from the geotechnical engineer shall be submitted with the application. 4. 'A Constructiori Stormwater Permit from Department of Ecology Is required if clearing and grading of the site exceeds one acre. . S. Surface Water System Development fees of $A05 per square.foot pf new Impervious surface will'apply. This is payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. 1. Frontage improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutter, planter strip, stone drainage, and street lighting Is required to be constructed In the right of way fronting the site in Glenwood Ave NE.'If not existing. Half street Improvements including 16 feet of pavement, 8 foot planter and 5 foot sidewalk Is required. 2. The existing right of way width in Glenwood Avenue Is 5o feet. An additional five feet of frontage will be required to be dedicated to the qty. I . RHA Townhomes — PRE 10-047 Page S of 8 March 9, 2011 3. Traffic Mitigation fees may apply. These fees are calculated in accordance with the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 8a' Edition If-this project triggers SEPA review. General Comments 1. Alf construction utility permits for drainage and street Improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2.' All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical Control Network 3, Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permlts are Issued. There will be additional fees for water service relat6d expenses. See Drafting Standards. DEPARTMENT OF a ar COMMUNITY ANDDim . ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: March 10, 2011 TO: Pre -Application File No. 09-018 (Revised) FROM: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Edwood Multi -Family General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre -application for the above - referenced development proposal. The foilowing comments on development and permitting Issues are based on the pre -application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on -the date of review. The applicant Is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision -makers (e,g., Nearing Examiner, Communtl & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator, Planning Director, Development Services Director, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant Is encouraged to review all -applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are avellable for purchase for $50.00 -plus tom, from the Finance Division ori the first floor of City Hall or online at 1%W,= onwa,f?oy Project Proposal: The subject property consists of two pareels*kKgted bqtween Edmonds Ave NE and Glenwood Ave NE just north of Sunset Blvd NE. The project site totals 0.65 acres in area and Is zoned Resesidentlal-14 (R-14). The proposal is to develop to site with 8 townhome units as replacement housing for the Renton Housing Authority. The applicant has proposed two schemes to accomplish tihe-desired proposal. The first scheme is a proposal for two buildings containing 4 townhome units each. The second scheme Is it proposal for a single building with all 8 townhome units. All comments noted below would be same for either scheme with the exception of comments related to design. Surface parkln& In the amount of 13 stalls, If being proposed on the southwestem portion of the site with temporary and permanent open space to the north of the parking Access to the site is proposed via a curb cut along Glenwood Ave NE. The proposed site Is located within Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection area. Current Use: A duplex Is located on southern parcel, which is proposed to be removed. The northern parcel Is vacant Development Standards: The project would be subject to RMC 4-2-110A, "Development Standards for Residential Zoning Designations" effective at the time of complete application (noted as "IT -14 standards" herein) and Design District V. Zoning / Density: The property Is located within the Residential -14 (R-14) zoning designation.. Attached residential development is permitted within the R-14 designation, provided the h:\cedjplanning\current planninglpreapps\2010 preapps\l0-047.rocale\10-047 (r-14 rha edwood rha- `� revised).doc Edwood, PREID-047 (revised) Page 2 of 7 March 10, 2011 ' proposal complies with the density range specified by the zone. However, up to 18 dwelling units per net acre (du/ac) are allowed as a bonus, subject to Density Bonus Review (RMC 4-9- 085). The area of public and private streets and critical areas would be deducted from the gross site area to determine the "net" site area prior to calculating density. There appears to be no deductions necessary for the proposal for the purposes of calculating density. An 8 unit proposal would result in a net density of 12.3 du/acre (8 units / 0.55 acres =12.3 du/ac), which is within the permitted density range in the R-14 zone. Mnsltv Bonus Review: The bonus provisions are Intended to allow greater flexibility in the mplementation of the purppse of the R-14 designation. A copy of the density bonus criteria has been attached to this memo. In order to qualify for the bonus density, the project must demonstrate that t(re same or better results will occur as a result of creative design solutions that would occur with uses developed under standard criteria at lower density. The applicant is not proposing to utlike the density bonus provisions at this time. Development Standards: The project would be. subject to RMC 4-2-110F, "Development Standards for Multl-Family Zoning Designations" effective at the time of complete application (noted as "R-14 standards" herein). A copy of these standards is Included herewith. Type of Standard R-14 Minimum Standard Lot Size None Lot Width and Depth Not Applicable Min Front Yard 8 ft to building, 5 ft to porch, or 7 ft to stoop. 18 ft to garage Max Front Yard None Side Yard 4 ft Rear Yard 12 ft., except when rear yard is abutting a common open space, then 4 ft. Side Yard Along -A -Street None Building Coverage Ratio None Impervious Surface Area 85% Maximum Gross Floor Area None Height 30 ft Height 30 ft Landscaping Tree Retention 10 % of significant trees Minimum Lot Size. Width and Depth — The applicant would be required to either request a lot consolidation or a lot ilne adjustment In order to construct the site as proposed In either scheme. &AUds—The proposal appears to comply with the setback requirements of the zone. hAceftlannlnAcurrent planninftreapps\2010 preapps110-047.rocale110-047 (r-14 iha edwood rha- reviscd).doc Edwood, PREID-047 (revised) Page 3 of 7 March 10, 2011 Jgt Coverage -- The CV zone allows a maximurq lot coverage of 65% which can be Increased to 75% if parking is provided within the structure. information regarding the footprint of the proposed structure was not provided with the submittal materials, therefore staff was not able to calculate the number lot coverage of the proposal. A lot coverage analysis meeting the requirements In RMC 4.8-1200.12, shall be submitted at the time of formal land use application. fig= —The height of the proposed structure appears comply with the height requirements of the zone. Access/Parklne—The following ratios would be applicable to the site: Based on these parking requirements, a minimum of 2 parking spaces would be required and maximum of 14 parking spaces would be allowed in order to meet code. The applicant is proposing to provide a total of 13 parking spaces which falls within the allowable range. The applicant will be required at the time of formal land use application to provide detailed parking Information (i.e. stall and drive aisle dimensions) and calculations of the subject site and the overall campus use. if the proposal provides more or less parking than required by code, a request for a parking modification would need to be applied for and granted. This detatled written request should be submitted by the applicant along with or prior to the land use application process. At should be noted that the parking regulations specify standard stall dimensions. Surface parking stalls must be a minimum of 9 feet x 20 feet, compact dimensions of 8% feet x 16 feet, and parallel stall dimensions of 9 feet x 23 feet; compact surface parking spaces shall not account for more than 30 percent of the spaces In the surface parking lots. Pedestrian Access iR-141 Sldewalks shall be provided throughout the neighborhood. The sidewalk may disconnect from the road, provided It continues In a logical route throughout the dqvelopment. Front yards shall have entry walks that .am a minimum width of 3 feet and a maximum width of 4 feet: Pathways shall be used to connect common parks, green areas, and pocket parks to residential access streets, limited residential access streets, or other pedestrian connections. They may be used to provide access to homes and common open space. They shall be a minimum 3 ft. in width and made of paved asphalt, concrete, or porous material such as: porous paving stones, crushed gravel with soil stabilizers, or paving blocks with planted joints. Sidewalks or pathways for barks and green spaces shall. be located at the edge of the common space to allow a larger usable green and easy access to homes. The appliarnt would be required to revise the site plan to lndude a pedestrian conneetlan to Glenwood just to the south of the proposed structure/s. J andscauing — Except 'for critical areas, all portions of the development area which are not covered by structures, required parking, access, circulation or service areas, must be landscaped with native, drought -resistant vegetative cover. The minimum onsite landscape width required along street frontages Is 10 feet. Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070 and RMC 4-4-=F.7) for further general and specific landscape requirements (enclosed). A conceptual landscape plan and landscape analysis nteetfng the requirements in RMC 4-8-1200.12, shall be submitted at the time of land use application. h:lcedlplanninAcurrent planninglpreapps\7.Dio preapps110-047.rocale�l0-047 (r-14 rha edwood rha- revised).doc U �! � ulr�ed �Spg Affordable Attached Residentlal . a units Min:1 space / 4 unit Max: 1.75 s ces unit Min: 112 Max: 196 Based on these parking requirements, a minimum of 2 parking spaces would be required and maximum of 14 parking spaces would be allowed in order to meet code. The applicant is proposing to provide a total of 13 parking spaces which falls within the allowable range. The applicant will be required at the time of formal land use application to provide detailed parking Information (i.e. stall and drive aisle dimensions) and calculations of the subject site and the overall campus use. if the proposal provides more or less parking than required by code, a request for a parking modification would need to be applied for and granted. This detatled written request should be submitted by the applicant along with or prior to the land use application process. At should be noted that the parking regulations specify standard stall dimensions. Surface parking stalls must be a minimum of 9 feet x 20 feet, compact dimensions of 8% feet x 16 feet, and parallel stall dimensions of 9 feet x 23 feet; compact surface parking spaces shall not account for more than 30 percent of the spaces In the surface parking lots. Pedestrian Access iR-141 Sldewalks shall be provided throughout the neighborhood. The sidewalk may disconnect from the road, provided It continues In a logical route throughout the dqvelopment. Front yards shall have entry walks that .am a minimum width of 3 feet and a maximum width of 4 feet: Pathways shall be used to connect common parks, green areas, and pocket parks to residential access streets, limited residential access streets, or other pedestrian connections. They may be used to provide access to homes and common open space. They shall be a minimum 3 ft. in width and made of paved asphalt, concrete, or porous material such as: porous paving stones, crushed gravel with soil stabilizers, or paving blocks with planted joints. Sidewalks or pathways for barks and green spaces shall. be located at the edge of the common space to allow a larger usable green and easy access to homes. The appliarnt would be required to revise the site plan to lndude a pedestrian conneetlan to Glenwood just to the south of the proposed structure/s. J andscauing — Except 'for critical areas, all portions of the development area which are not covered by structures, required parking, access, circulation or service areas, must be landscaped with native, drought -resistant vegetative cover. The minimum onsite landscape width required along street frontages Is 10 feet. Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070 and RMC 4-4-=F.7) for further general and specific landscape requirements (enclosed). A conceptual landscape plan and landscape analysis nteetfng the requirements in RMC 4-8-1200.12, shall be submitted at the time of land use application. h:lcedlplanninAcurrent planninglpreapps\7.Dio preapps110-047.rocale�l0-047 (r-14 rha edwood rha- revised).doc Edwood, PRE10-047 (revised) Page 4 of 7 March 10, 2011 Open kp.@ _(R 1A) For each unit In the development, three hundred fifty (350) square feet of common open space shall be provided. Open space shall be designed as a park, common green, pea -patch, pocket park, or pedestrian entry easement in the development and shall include picnic areas, space for small recreational activities, and other activities as appropriate. Open space shall be located in a highly visible area and be easily accessible to the neighborhood. Open space shall be contiguous, serve a minimum of four (4) homes, and be at least twenty feet (20') wide. A pedestrian entry easement can be used to meet the requirements If It has a minlmum width of twenty feet (20') with a minimum five feet (5') of sidewalk. Pea -patches shall be at least one thousand (1,000) square feet in size with individual plots that measure ten feet by ten feet (10'x 10'). Additionally, if a pea -patch is used to fulfill the open space requirement It shall Include a tool shed and a common area with space for compost bins. Water shall be provided to the pea - patch. Fencing that meets the standards for front yard fencing shall surround the pea -patch with a one foot (1') landscape area on the outside of the fence. This area is to be landscaped with flowers, plants, and/or shrubs. Grass -trete or other pervious surfaces may be used in thq common open space for the purpose of meeting the one hundred.fifty feet (150') distance requirement for Emergency Vehicle Access. Storm ponds may be used to meet the common open apace requirement If designed to accommodate a fifty (50) year storm and to be dry ninety percent (9096) of the year. Only permapent open space, would be caasldeted for the purposed of meeting the requirements outlined above. Private Yards (R-14] Each individual unit shall have a private yard that is at least two hundred fifty (250) square feet In size with no dimension less than eight feet (8') In width. ,uglBeColign —A tree Inventory and Vee retention plan along with a tree retention worksheet shall be provided with the formal land use application. The Aree retention pian must show preservation of at least 10% of significant trees on site, and Indicate how proposed building footprints would be sited to accommodate preservation of significant trees that would be retained. If the trees cannot be retained, they may be replaced with minimum: 2 Inch caliper trees ata rate of 6:1. Ref= goo BgI;WJ0gAmas -- Refuse and recycling areas are required to meet the requirements of RMC 4-4090, "Refuse and Recydables Standards" (enclosed). Trash and recycling containers shall be located so that they have minimal Impact on residents and their neighbors and so that they are not visible to the general public. Additionally, a screened and roofed enclosure In which to keep containers shall be provided. Screened enclosures shall not be located within front yards. Fences —If the applicant Intends to install any fences as part of this project, the location must be designated on the landscape plan. A fence detalf should also be Included on the plan as well. Building Design Standards Compliance with Urban Design Regulations District D standards shall be required for the larger parcel. See RMC 4-3-100. The applicant will be required to complete a Design District Checklist (see attached). The Planning Division prefers a two bullding proposal In that 1# will break up h.\oad\planningNarrent piannln&reappsV010 pmapps\10-047.rocafe110-047 (r-14 rha edwood rha- revtsed).doc Edwood, PRESO-047 (revised) Page 5 of 7 March 10, 2031 the massing of the.strudure and offer a better transition to exrsting structures that surround the site. Below are some of the Identified design standards that need to be addressed in the proposal: 1. A primaryentrance of each building shall be located on the facade facing a street, shall be prominent, visible from the street; connected by a walkway to the public sidewalk, and Include human -scale elements. Facades shall be articulated and vehicular entrances to nonresidential or mixed use parking structures shall be articulated by arches, lintels, masonry trim, or other architectural elements and/or materials. 2. Pedestrian pathways within parking lots or parking modules shall be differentiated by material or texture from abutting paving materials. 3. Site furniture shall be provided and shall be made of durable, vandal- and weather - resistant materials that do not retain rainwater and can be reasonably maintained over an extended perlod of time. 4. Amount of common space or recreation area to be provided is minimum fifty (50) . square feet per unit. All building facades shall Include modulation or articulation at Intervals of no more than fbrry feet (40'). 5. - Human -scaled elements such as a lighting fixture, trellis, or other landscape feature shall be provided along the facade's ground.floor. 6. On anyfacade visible to the public,,transparent windows and/or doors are required to comprise at least fifty percent (5096) of the portion of the ground floor facade that is between four feet (4') and eight feet (8') above ground (as measured on the true elevation). 7. Lighting shall also'be provided on building facades (such as sconces) and/orto Illuminate other key elements of the site such as specimen trees, other significant landscaping, water features, and/or artwork. Environmental Review When a project is proposed as part of a• planned action, environmental review consists of verifying ' that the proposal meets the requirements of the planned action ordinance.. No additional determination is required as the procedural aspects of WA have already been - completed. Critical Areas It appears that the site Is located In Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection Area; therefore a saurce statement as -described In RMC 4-8-120.D.19 is required for each source location from which Imported fill will be obtained. Permit Requirements: The proposal would require an Administrative Site Plan approval which would be.reviewed in an estimated timeframe of,9 weeks. Additionally, the applicant can'opt to request a Lot Line Adjustment or a Lot Consolidation in order to combine the two lots. This can be reviewed concurrently with the Site Plan Review. The purpose of the Site Plan process Is the detailed arrangement of project elements so ps to be compatible with the physical characteristics of a site and with the surrounding area. An hAceftlannlnAcurrentplanning\preapps\2010 preapps\10-047.rocale\l0-047 (r-14 rha edwood rha- revised),doc Edwood, PRE10-047 (revised) Page 6 of 7 March 10, 2011 additional purpose of Site Plan Is to ensure quality development consistent with City goals and policies. General review criteria Includes: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Pian; b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of Impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; e. Conservation of areawide property values; f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air, h. Mitigation of noise, odors and ,other harmful or unhealthyconditions; 1. Availability of public services and facilities; and j. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The Site Plan Review application fee is $1,8D0. A Lot Une Adjustment. would have a fee of $458 and the Lot Consolidation request does not require an application fee. Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal is provided In the attached handouts. In addition to the required land use permits, separate oonstruction, building and sign permits would be required. The review.of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of the land use permits, but cannot be issued priorto the completion of any appeal periods. ImpaWMidgation Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction flees, the following mitigation fees would be required prior to the Issuance of building permits. %R &C& whkh-would a which an applicant may vest to lmpaet mtbl gafJpr� fee. Those fees have yet to be determined. Crrrrendy fees are the following: A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per BM daily trip attributed to the development; and ♦ A Parks Mitigation Fee based on $35451 per new multi -family unit; and, • A School Mitigation Fee based on $1,1580.00 per unit; and A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $388.00 per multi -family unR. A request can be made, at the time of application for Site Plan Review, for relief fmm Impact fees, as the proposed units would replace existing units in the area. A.handout listing all of the City's Development related fees in attached for your review, Expiration: Upon site pian approval, the site plan approval is valid for two years with a possible twoiear extension. 'Phasing For development proposed on only a portion of a particular site, an applicant may choose to submit a site development plan application for either the entire site or the portion of the site. In h:loed\planning\current planning\pmapps\2010 preapps\1D-047.racale110-047 (r-14 rha edwood rha- revised).doe A Ed wood, PREIO-047 (revised) Page 7 of 7 March 10, 2011 the latter case, the application shall state clearly the area of the site and the proposed development, including phases, for which site development plan approval Is being requested. In every case, the site development plan application and review shall cover at least that portion of the site which is directly related to or may be impacted by the actual proposed development, as determined by the Environmental Review Commlttee. The Reviewing Official may $rant site development plan approval for large projects planned to be developed or redeveloped in phases over a period'of years exceeding the nofmaI time limits - of subsection L of this Section. Such approval shall Include clearly defined phases and specific time limits for each- phase. If the time limits of a particular phase are not satisfied, then site development plan approval for that phase and subsequent phases shall expire. The Hearing Examiner -shall also determine If such a phased project will be eligible for any extensions of the time limits. As long as the development of a phased project conforms to the approved phasing plan, the zoning regulations In effect at the time of.the original approval shall continue to apply. However, all construction shall conform -to the Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire Code regulations In force at the time of building permit application. Mce ftlarnninAcurrent pianning\preapps\2010 preapps\10-o47.rocaie110.047 (r-14 rho edwood rho-' revised).doc 0 & # Z PLANNING DIVISION WAIVEri OF SUBMITTAL REQUIKEMENTS P'" ng Renton FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS rig �'"r5ro" JUN 3 0,1011 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: 4. Planning Section Cit l�-�/ r-..��� �� � � ✓� o-Jr-�-y.J+* �J Cv 1 2— O:IWEBIPMDEVSERVIFormslPlanninglwaiverofsubmittalregs.xls 02108 PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIRE FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Planning Section PROJECT NAME: DATE: Q:IWEB%PMDEVSERVTormslPlanninglwaiverofsubm1ttalregs.As 02108 City of Renton r -fanning . TREE RETENTION JUN 30- WORKSHEET 1. Total number of trees over 6" in diameter' on project site: 1. trees 2. Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation: Trees that are dead, diseased or dangerous2 -49-- trees Trees in proposed public streets --C,' trees Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts -4;- trees Trees in critical areas3 and buffers -&- trees Total number of excluded trees: 2. -CO— trees 6:3 3. Subtract line 2 from 11ne 9: 3. trees 4. Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained4, multiply line 3 by: 0.3 in zones RC, R-1, R4, or R-8 -410.1 In all other residential zones (lE-yq) 0.05 in all commercial and industrial zones 4. O. 6, trees 5. List the number of 6" or larger trees that you are proposing5 to retain 4: 5. Z trees 6. Subtract 11ne 5 from 11ne 4 for trees to be replaced: 6. --),4- trees .�j (if line 6 is less than zero. stop here. No replacement trees are required). 7. Multiply line 6 by 12" for number of required replacement inches: 7. Inches 8. Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement: (Minimum 2' caliper trees required) 8. inches per tree 9. Divide 11ne 7 by line 8 for number of replacement treess: (if remainder is .5 or greater, round up to the next whole number) 9, trees e Measured at chest height. 1, Dead, diseased or dangerous trees must be certified as such by a forester, registered landscape architect, or certified arborist, and approved by the city. Critical Areas, such as wetlands, streams, floodplafns and protected slopes, are defined In Section 4-3-050 of the Renton Municipal Code (RMC). 4, Count only those trees to be retained outside of critical areas and buffers. 5 The City may require modification of the tree retention pian to ensure retention of the maximum number of trees per RMC 4-4-130H7a i, Indies of street trees, Inches of trees added to critical areaslbuffers, and incites of trees retained on site that . are less than B" but are greater than Z" can be used to meet the tree replacement requirement. H:Division/Forms/rrecketouionWarkshe d 11/07 N SMs- : r>P. 4 M. DENSITY WORKSHEET C-ryOfRen Clay of Renton Planning Division .111N 3 0 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, WA 98057 1011 Phone: 425430-7204 Fax: 425430-7231 1. Gross area ofro p party: 1. 27.484 square feet (Includes a reduction of i,000 sf as a 5' dedication to City ROW) 2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include: Public streets** Private access easements'"* Critical Areas* Total excluded area: 3. Subtract line 2 from line T for net area: 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned: 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: square feet square feet square feet 2. 0 square feet 3. 27.484 square feet 4. 0.63 acres B. 8 unitstlots 6. 12.7 = dwelling units/acre *Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations Including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways." Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. ** Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. C:Iboc=MW And S 1guYP0c9hP0=Y WaddhM 06-24-11Ax -1- 030 Design District "D" Checklisi RHA Glennwood Townhomes PLANNING DIVISION SPR: Item 9 DESIGN DISTRICT "D " CHECKLIST City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: 64.30.11 `''ry Of Renton Planning Division JUN 3 0. 2011 Ensure compliance with design review regulations located in the Renton Municipal Code in order to: a. Maintain and protect property values; b. Enhance the general appearance of the City; c. Encourage creativity in building and site design; d. Achieve predictability, balanced with flexibility; and e. Consider the individual merits of proposals. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This design district checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The City will use this checklist to determine whether the proposal complies with the Urban Design Regulations in the Renton Municipal Code (RMC 4-3-100). There are two categories that have been established: (a) "minimum standards" that must be met, and (b) "guidelines" that, while not mandatory, are considered by the Planning Director in determining if the proposed action meets the intent of the design guidelines if the standard cannot be met. Please describe how your proposal meets each standard. If you are not able to meet the standard, please describe how the proposal meets the intent and guidelines of the applicable section. If a question does not apply to your proposal, write "does not apply". Complete answers may avoid unnecessary delays in the processing of your review. 1. SITE DEIGN AND BUILDING LOCATION Intim: To onsur9 that WWI* mrs loste+d In rolatlon to streets and other, bulldinp so that the Yislon of thi iCity of Renton can bg riallxed for O'hlsh On.sKy urilaan orlvlrgoment; so ths! buslnissels *n)oy v1slibliltv ftm OublIc rl h 4 ; OL4 to 0 Prae' 404"rian activity. 1A. Bulldina Location and Orientation Intent: To ensure visibility of businesses and to establish active, lively uses along sidewalks and pedestrian pathways. To organize buildings for pedestrian use and so that natural light is available to other structures and open space. To ensure an appropriate transition between buildings, parking areas, and other land uses; and Increase privacy for residential uses. RHA Glenwood Townhomes — Page 1 of 20 h � ' Design District "D" Checklist RHA Glennwood Townhomes SPR: Item 9 Guidelines: Developments shall enhance the mutual relationship of buildings with each other, as well as with the roads, open space, and pedestrian amenities while working to create a pedestrian oriented environment. lots shall be configured to encourage variety and so that natural light is available to buildings and opens ace. The privacy of individuals in residential uses shall be provided for. 1.1 Standard: The availability of natural light (both direct and reflected) and direct sun exposure to nearby buildings and open space (except parking areas) shall be considered when siting structures. Response: The buildings have been located on the east side (e.g. street side) of the site to provide excellent solar access to the townhomes and common open space, as well as to existing neighboring properties. 1A.2 Standard: Buildings shall be oriented to the street with clear connections to the sidewalk. Response: The buildings have been located along Glennwood Avenue NE to create a prominent connection to the neighborhood, with walks connecting townhome entries directly to the sidewalk and enhancing the experience of the pedestrian -oriented streetscape. 1A.3 Standard: The front entry of a building shall be oriented to the street or a landscaped pedestrian - only courtyard. Response: The front entries of the townhomes have been separated by landscaped front yards to provide a sense of individual private space and enhance the experience of pedestrians along the sidewalk. The entries are oriented to the street and are strengthened with bays and covered porches. 1A.4 Standard: Buildings with residential uses located at the street level shall be set back from the sidewalk a minimum of ten feet (10') and feature substantial landscaping between the sidewalk and the building or Have the ground floor residential uses raised above street level for residents' privacy. Response: Does not apply to R-14 zoning standards. The townhomes have been located with 8'-10' landscaped front yard setbacks. Additional space to the sidewalk effectively creates front yards that are 14'-16' deep. Also, see response to 1 A.3 above. 18. Bulldlna Entries Intent: To make building entrances convenient to locate and easy to access, and ensure that building entries further the pedestrian nature of the fronting sidewalk and the urban character of the district. Guidelines: Primary entries shall face the street, serve as a focal point, and allow space for social Interaction. All entries shall include features that make them easily identifiable while reflecting the architectural character of the building. The primary entry shall be the most visually prominent entry. Pedestrian access to the building from the sidewalk, parking lots, and/or other areas shall be provided and shall enhance the overall quality of the pedestrian experience on the site. RHA Glenwood Townhomes — Page 2 of 20 Design District "D" Checklisi RHA Glennwood Townhomes SPR: Item 9 1B.1 Standard: A primary entrance of each building shall be located on the facade facing a street, shall be prominent, visible from the street, connected by a walkway to the public sidewalk, and include human -scale elements. Response: The front entries of the townhomes have been separated by landscaped front yards to provide a sense of individual private space and enhance the experience of pedestrians along the sidewalk. The prominent front entries are oriented to the street and are enhanced with bays and covered porches — human -scaled at one story height — and will serve as spaces for social interaction. 1B.2 Standard: A primary entrance of each building shall be made visibly prominent by incorporating architectural features such as a facade overhang, trellis, large entry doors, and/or ornamental lighting. Response: The private front entries of the townhomes are provided with several architectural features that will give them individuality and become very welcoming to the street. These features include angled bays that provide "eyes on the street", covered porches for weather protection, columns to define the porch space, and exterior lighting to mark the entries and provide security. 113.3 Standard Building entries from a street shall be clearly marked with canopies, architectural elements, ornamental lighting, or landscaping and include weather protection at least four and one-half feet (4-1/2') wide (illustration below). Buildings that are taller than thirty feet (30') in height shall also ensure that the weather protection is proportional to the distance above ground level. Response: See response to f B.2 above. 1B.4 Standard: Building entries from a parking lot shall be subordinate to those related to the street. Response: The units have sliding glass doors to rear private patio areas, with weather -protection in the form of canopies above. These rear entries are subordinate to the primary unit entries that face the street. 1B.5 Standard: Features such as entries, lobbies, and display windows shall be oriented to a street or pedestrian -oriented space; otherwise, screening or decorative features should be incorporated. Response: Does not apply. 113.6 Standard: Multiple buildings on the same site shall direct views to building entries by providing a continuous network of pedestrian paths and open spaces that incorporate landscaping. Response: The buildings have been located to create a prominent line -of -sight connection via walks from townhome entries directly to the sidewalk. A walkway will be provided to connect the sidewalk to the middle of the site, the common space with children's playground structure, and access to the parking area. RHA Glenwood Townhomes — Page 3 of 20 Design District "D" Checklist RHA Glennwood Townhomes SPR: Item 9 1B.7 Standard: Ground floor residential units that are directly accessible from the street shall include entries from front yards to provide transition space from the street or entries from an open space such as a courtyard or garden that is accessible from the street. Response: See response to 1A.3 above. 1C. Transition to SurroundintcDerClopMgat Intent: To shape redevelopment projects so that the character and value of Renton's long-established, existing neighborhoods are preserved. Guidelines: Careful siting and design treatment shall be used to achieve a compatible transition where new buildings differ from surrounding development in terms of building height, bulk and scale. 1C.1 Standard: At least one of the following design elements shall be used to promote a transition to surrounding uses: 1) Building proportions, including step -backs on upper levels in accordance with the surrounding planned and existing land use forms; or 2) Building articulation to divide a larger architectural element into smaller increments; or 3) Roof lines, roof pitches, and roof shapes designed to reduce apparent bulk and transition with existing development. Additionally, the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee may require increased setbacks at the side or rear of a building in order to reduce the bulk and scale of larger buildings and/or so that sunlight reaches adjacent and/or abutting yards. Response: The buildings provide a transition to surrounding uses by means of modulation, roof articulation, and fa4ade elements. • The outboard units in each building have been set back 2' to reduce the building scale and mass, and thus help fit the scale of the existing neighborhood. ■ The unit roofs are articulated with steep pitches that scale down the apparent building size and provide a fun and energetic building form that will mesh well with the character of adjacent buildings. • Front porches with bays and columns, side bays, and a change in siding at front and rear all contribute to scaling the buildings to the surrounding uses. The selection of windows, siding exposure, and building detailing will also contribute to interesting buildings that work well in the neighborhood. 1D. Service Element -Location gnd Design Intent: To reduce the pptential negative impacts of service elements (i.e., waste receptacles, loading docks) by locating service and loading areas away from pedestrian areas, and screening them from view in high vislbIIl areas. Guidelines: Service elements shall be concentrated and located so that impacts to pedestrians and other abutting uses are minimized. The impacts of service elements shall be mitigated with landscaping and an enclosure with fencing that is made of quality materials. RHA Glenwood Townhomes — Page A of 20 Design District "D" Checklisi RHA Glennwood Townhomes SPR: Item 9 IDA Standard: Service elements shall be located and designed to minimize the impacts on the pedestrian environment and adjacent and/or abutting uses. Service elements shall be concentrated and located where they are accessible to service vehicles and convenient for tenant use. Response: To minimize negative impact to the street and to the tenants, the screened recycle/waste area has been located in the rear yard area alongside the vehicle access aisle and next to the parking area. This location works well in being both easily accessible to residents yet visually screened from them. 1D.2 Standard: In addition to standard enclosure requirements, garbage, recycling collection, and utility areas shall be enclosed on all sides, including the roof and screened around their perimeter by a wall or fence and have self-closing doors. Response: The design of the recycle/waste station will be based on the station recently constructed in RHA's Evergreen Terrace housing in the Renton Highlands. This will be a substantial station constructed of concrete walls with metal "barn" doors and structure, and include a sloped roof for weather protection which could potentially have a green roof to demonstrate sustainability. 1D.3 Standard: Service enclosures shall be made of masonry, ornamental metal or wood, or some combination of the three (3). Response: See response to 1 D.2 above. 1D.4 Standard: If the service area is adjacent to a street, pathway, or pedestrian -oriented space, a landscaped planting strip, minimum three feet (3') wide, shall be located on three (3) sides of such facility. Response: Landscaping will be provided around the enclosure, between the enclosure and townhomes. In addition, the recycle/waste station is designed as a place for community interaction and "bulletin board" for learning about sustainable practices. It is intended to be a positive gem in the landscape — not the usual eyesore — and thus not require heavy landscaping to hide everything from view. 1E. Gateways Intent: To distinguish gateways as primary entrances to districts or to the City, special design features and architectural elements at gateways should be provided. While gateways should be distinctive within the context of the district, they should also be compatible with the district In form and scale. Guidelines: Development that occurs at gateways should be distinguished with features that visually indicate to both pedestrians and vehicular traffic the uniqueness and prominence of their locations in the City. Examples of these types of features include monuments, public art, and public plazas. 1E.1 Standard: Developments located at district gateways shall be marked with visually prominent features. Response: Does not apply. RHA Glenwood Townhomes — Page 5 of 20 Design District "D" Checklist RHA Glennwood Townhomes SPR: Item 4 1E.2 Standard: Gateway elements shall be oriented toward and scaled for both pedestrians and vehicles. Response: Does not apply. 1E.3 Standard: Visual prominence shall be distinguished by two (2) or more of the following: 1) Public art; 2) Special landscape treatment; 3) Open space/plaza; 4) Landmark building form; 5) Special paving, unique pedestrian scale lighting, or bollards; 6) Prominent architectural features (trellis, arbor, pergola, or gazebo); 7) Neighborhood or district entry identification (commercial signs do not qualify). Response: Does not apply. 2. PARKING N� HICUluAR ACCESS r4 ., .. InteriV T'o provide sofat tWonlonj access; Incorporate various modes of trensjEportatjo jpcludln public t i stx, In ardor to T",04co traffic volumes and other lamcte from val iarleiti ilk; )�I�1 ul'R�».0lit perky Is provided, v�il+il pna; uia�aging a tea t alt�l fp ndudngt 0.lmpocts �f pa�i�C.fts l l all on active apadest"N'o *W.roniroent by maintaining contiguous $trret fronta tes,.without pi 61"';lot siting along v1dowelk; Viand Oulldlpg facades; minimise the visual Impact of parking lots; and uO Ittcess :teats and mkinstomilritaln on urban ad oto the district. 2A. Surface Parking Intent: To maintain active pedestrian environments along streets by placing parking lots primarily in back of buildings. Guidelines: Surface parking shall be located and designed so as to reduce the visual impact of the parking area and associated vehicles. Large areas of surface parking shall also be designed to accommodate future infill development. 2A.1 Standard: Parking shall be located so that no surface parking is located between a building and the front property line, or the building and side property line, on the street side of a corner lot. Response: The surface parking area is located in the rear yard, behind the buildings, and away from the side property line. In this way, it will provide for the parking needs of the residents while being mindful of not intruding on resident's private rear patio area and privacy. 2A.2 Standard: Parking shall be located so that it is screened from surrounding streets by buildings, landscaping, and/or gateway features as dictated by location. Response: Due to its location, the parking area will be screened from the street by the townhomes — effectively hiding it from view from people in the neighborhood. In addition, landscaping will screen the parking from the townhome residents, so that car headlights will not penetrate into the units. RHA Glenwood Townhomes — Page 6 of 20 Design District "D" Checklis7 RHA Glennwood Townhomes SPR: Item 9 2B. Structured Parking and Garages Intent: To promote more efficient use of land needed for vehicle parking; encourage the use of structured parking; physically and visually integrate parking garages with other uses; and reduce the overall Impact of parking garalges. Guidelines: Parking garages shall not dominate the streetscape; they shall be designed to be complementary with adjacent and abutting buildings. They shall be sited to complement, not subordinate, pedestrian entries. Similar forms, materials, and/or details to the primary building(s) should be used to enhance garages. 26.1 Standard: Parking structures shall provide space for ground floor commercial uses along street frontages at a minimum of seventy five percent (75%) of the building frontage width. Response: Does not apply. 28.2 Standard: The entire facade must feature a pedestrian -oriented facade. The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development may approve parking structures that do not feature a pedestrian orientation in limited circumstances. If allowed, the structure shall be set back at least six feet (6') from the sidewalk and feature substantial landscaping. This landscaping shall include a combination of evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs, and ground cover. This setback shall be increased to ten feet (14') when abutting a primary arterial and/or minor arterial. Response: Does not apply. 213.3 Standard: Public facing facades shall be articulated by arches, lintels, masonry trim, or other architectural elements and/or materials. Response: Does not apply. 213.4 Standard: The entry to the parking garage shall be located away from the primary street, to either the side or rear of the building. Response: Does not apply. 2B.5 Standard: Parking garages at grade shall include screening or be enclosed from view with treatment such as walls, decorative grilles, trellis with landscaping, or a combination of treatments. Response: Does not apply. RHA Glenwood Townhomes — Page 7 of 20 Design District "D" Checklist RHA Glennwood Townhomes 101211311111111MAOMe 26.6 Standard: The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee may allow a reduced setback where the applicant can successfully demonstrate that the landscaped area and/or other design treatment meets the intent of these standards and guidelines. Possible treatments to reduce the setback include landscaping components plus one or more of the following integrated with the architectural design of the building: 1) Ornamental grillwork (other than vertical bars); 2) Decorative artwork; 3) Display windows; 4) Brick, tile, or stone; 5) Pre -cast decorative panels; 6) Vine -covered trellis; 7) Raised landscaping beds with decorative materials; or 8) Other treatments that meet the intent of this standard. Response: Does not apply. 2C. Vehicular Access Intent: To maintain a contiguous and uninterrupted sidewalk by minimizing, consolidating, and/or eliminating vehicular access off streets. Guidelines: Vehicular access to parking garages and parking lots shall not Impede or interrupt pedestrian mobility. The impacts of curb cuts to pedestrian access on sidewalks shall be minimized. 2C.1 Standard: Access to parking lots and garages shall be from alleys, when available. If not available, access shall occur at side streets. Response: Access to the parking area is provided via an access aisle that connects to Glennwood Avenue. This access aisle will also be used by recycle/waste trucks for weekly service pickups. The vehicular access has deliberately been located away from the pedestrian access path between the two buildings, thus making sure that pedestrians do not feel subordinate to or encroached upon by vehicle traffic. 2C.2 Standard: The number of driveways and curb cuts shall be minimized, so that pedestrian circulation along the sidewalk is minimally impeded. Response: Before the northern duplex was demolished long ago, the site essentially had four curbcuts connecting to driveways. The townhome project proposes a single curbcut, connecting to a two-way drive aisle. This reduction of three curbcuts will be a positive improvement for pedestrians walking on the sidewalks — fewer chances to cross paths with vehicles — as well as providing for more landscaping that enhances the streetscape. S. PEDESMIAN 9NIVIIRQNI 14f y lrftrifh T6 ire U newo ktl � qr I bra i�nk1 I� �' pi RRd t o 1 n" 06 del l!hm life ��+tl�rh�r'�J 00 r � 1 tln�u , +it>r►1 thlr ~ir r. l r X11 �.i �l� i l d kilo, e RHA Glenwood Townhomes — Page 8 of 20 Design District "D" Checklis, RHA Glennwood Townhomes SPR: item 9 3A. -Pedestrian QrSulatign intent: To create a network of linkages for pedestrians, that is safe and convenient, enhances the pedestrian environment, and provides a way for pedestrians to walk from one location to another without having to drive their vehicle. Guidelines: The pedestrian environment shall be given priority and importance in the design of projects. Sidewalks and/or pathways shall be provided and shall provide safe access to buildings from parking areas. Providing pedestrian connections to abutting properties is an important aspect of connectivity and encourages pedestrian activity and shall be considered. Pathways shall be easily identifiable to pedestrians and drivers. 3A.1 Standard: A pedestrian circulation system of pathways that are clearly delineated and connect buildings, open space, and parking areas with the sidewalk system and abutting properties shall be provided. a. Pathways shall be located so that there are clear sight lines, to increase safety. b. Pathways shall be an ail -weather or permeable walking surface, unless the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed surface is appropriate for the anticipated number of users and complementary to the design of the development. Response: An all-weather paved walkway will be provided that connects the sidewalk to the inner portions of the site. Starting at the sidewalk (next to the mailbox kiosk), it will travel between the buildings, join a common area next to a play structure, and then connect to the parking area. Residents can step off this path to enter into their personal back yard patio areas. Residents will also walk through the parking area to connect to the recycle/waste station. 3A.2 Standard: Pathways within parking areas shall be provided and differentiated by material or texture (i.e., raised walkway, stamped concrete, or pavers) from abutting paving materials. Permeable materials are encouraged. The pathways shall be perpendicular to the applicable building facade and no greater than one hundred fifty feet (150') apart. Response: The walkway is planned as concrete -- possibly porous — and will be differentiated against the adjacent landscape plantings and lawns; and will provide a pleasant path to connect the residents with all portions of the site. RHA Glenwood Townhomes — Page 9 of 20 Design District "D" Checklist RHA Glennwood Townhomes SPR: Item 9 3A.3 Standard: Sidewalks and pathways along the facades of buildings shall be of sufficient width to accommodate anticipated numbers of users. Specifically: a. Sidewalks and pathways along the facades of mixed use and retail buildings one hundred (100) or more feet in width (measured along the facade) shall provide sidewalks at least twelve feet (12') in width. The pathway shall include an eight -foot (8') minimum unobstructed walking surface. b. Interior pathways shall be provided and shall vary in width to establish a hierarchy. The widths shall be based on the intended number of users; to be no smaller than five feet (5') and no greater than twelve feet (12'). Response: The pathway between buildings is planned to be 6' wide, which would allow for some landscaping to be placed up close to the edge and still maintain a 5' minimum width softened by a living edge. The pathway's "elbow" will be a 17' diameter circle with fixed outdoor seating provided for residents. A flagpole will prominently be located in the middle: visible from the neighborhood and residents alike. 3A.4 Standard: Mid -block connections between buildings shall be provided. Response: Does not apply. 3B,, Pedestrian Amerillies Intent: To create attractive spaces that unify the building and street environments and are inviting and comfortable for pedestrians; and provide publicly accessible areas that function for a variety of year- round activities, under typical seasonal weather conditions. Guidelines: The pedestrian environment shall be given priority and importance in the design of projects. Amenities that encourage pedestrian use and enhance the pedestrian experience shall be included. 38.1 Standard: Architectural elements that incorporate plants, particularly at building entrances, in publicly accessible spaces and at facades along streets, shall be provided. Response: Landscaping will be provided at the front yards and entrances to all townhome units. The type and scale of plantings will be carefully chosen to enhance the pedestrian experience of both tenants and passersby. 38.2 Standard: Amenities such as outdoor group seating, benches, transit shelters, fountains, and public art shall be provided. a. Site furniture shall be made of durable, vandal- and weather -resistant materials that do not retain rainwater and can be reasonably maintained over an extended period of time. b. Site furniture and amenities shall not impede or block pedestrian access to public spaces or building entrances. Response: Outdoor seating will be provided around the perimeter to the outdoor play structure in the rear yard, providing a pleasant way for residents to socialize and enjoy the common open space together. RHA Glenwood Townhomes — Page 10 of 20 Design District "D" Checklis) RHA Glennwood Townhomes SPR: Item 9 38.3 Standard: Pedestrian overhead weather protection in the form of awnings, marquees, canopies, or building overhangs shall be provided. These elements shall be a minimum of four and one-half feet (4- 1/2') wide along at least seventy five percent (75%) of the length of the building facade facing the street, a maximum height of fifteen feet (15') above the ground elevation, and no lower than eight feet (8') above ground level. Response: Does not apply. 4, RECREATION *REAS ANp CQ OIAON OUN Ep6 E intan; To aasaisure that araRas, Owei11� al�ctive repreetion ore arrvellable to residents, workers, and visltor* pod�thot these act0.ai Pirp Oui'flc?e4t *e for the Intended activlty and inconvenient locaa tlons. To create usable and inufrkln4 opon.000 ! that Is accessible to the public; end to'prQmote pedestrian activity on streets , yattrtIculaat at street corners. Guidelines: Developments located at street intersections should provide pedestrian -oriented space at the street corner to emphasize pedestrian activity (illustration below). Recreation and common open space areas are integral aspects of quality development that encourage pedestrians and users. These areas shall be provided in an amount that is adequate to be functional and usable; they shall also be landscaped and located so that they are appealing to users and pedestrians. 4A.1 Standard: All mixed use residential and attached housing developments of ten (10) or more dwelling units shall provide common opens space and/or recreation areas. Response: Does not apply. 4A.2 Standard: Amount of common space or recreation area to be provided: at minimum fifty (50) square feet per unit. Response: Doe not apply. The project will follow open space requirements for R-14 zone: 350 sf of common open space per unit. 4A.3 Standard: The location, layout, and proposed type of common space or recreation area shall be subject to approval by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee. Response: The common open space will be located in the rear yard in the northwest section of the site. It will include a children's outdoor play structure surrounded by gently sloping lawn area and fixed outdoor seating. This location was selected to provide good sightlines and security from each unit, as well as being set away from the parking and recycle/waste station. The owner plans to work with KaBOOM!, a national non-profit, to organize a community "barn raising" to construct the play structure. RHA Glenwood Townhomes -- Page 11 of 20 Design District "D" Checklist RHA Glennwood Townhomes SPR: Item 9 4A.4 Standard: Open space or recreation areas shall be located to provide sun and light exposure to the area and located so that they are aggregated to provide usable area(s) for residents. Response: The location of the common open space will ensure good sun exposure — especially from early morning through mid-afternoon during spring, summer, and fall. Combined with landscape planting, this will create a very pleasant experience for the tenants. 4A.5 Standard: At least one of the following shall be provided in each open space and/or recreation area (the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee may require more than one of the following elements for developments having more than one hundred (100) units): 1) Courtyards, plazas, or multi-purpose open spaces; 2) upper level common decks, patios, terraces, or roof gardens/pea-patches. Such spaces above the street level must feature views or amenities that are unique to the site and are provided as an asset to the development; 3) Pedestrian corridors dedicated to passive recreation and separate from the public street system; 4) Recreation facilities including, but not limited to, tennis/sports courts, swimming pools, exercise areas, game rooms, or other similar facilities; or 5) Children's play spaces that are centrally located near a majority of dwelling units and visible from surrounding units. They shall also be located away from hazardous areas such as garbage dumpsters, drainage facilities, and parking areas. Response: See response to 4A.3 above. 4A.6 Standard: The following shall not be counted toward the common open space or recreation area requirement: 1) Required landscaping, driveways, parking, or other vehicular use areas; 2) Required yard setback areas. Except for areas that are developed as private or semi -private (from abutting or adjacent properties) courtyards, plazas or passive use areas containing landscaping and fencing sufficient to create a fully usable area accessible to all residents of the development; 3) Private decks, balconies, and private ground floor open space; and 4) Other required landscaping and sensitive area buffers without common access links, such as pedestrian trails. Response: The common open space location complies with the above requirements, and works well with the various other function requirements such as landscaping, parking, and private rear patio spaces at each unit. 4A.7 Standard: All buildings and developments with over thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of nonresidential uses (excludes parking garage floorplate areas) shall provide pedestrian -oriented space. Response: Does not apply. RHA Glenwood Townhomes — Page 12 of 20 Design District "D" Checklis, RHA Glennwood Townhomes SPR: Item 9 4A.8 Standard: The pedestrian -oriented space for buildings and developments with over thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of nonresidential uses shall be provided according to the following formula: 1% of the site area + 1% of the gross building area, at minimum. Response: Does not apply. 4A.9 Standard: The pedestrian -oriented space for buildings and developments with over thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of nonresidential uses shall include all of the following: 1) Visual and pedestrian access (including barrier -free access) to the abutting structures from the public right-of-way or a nonvehicular courtyard; and 2) Paved walking surfaces of either concrete or approved unit paving; and 3) On-site or building -mounted lighting providing at least four (4) foot-candles (average) on the ground; and 4) At least three (3) lineal feet of seating area (bench, ledge, etc.) or one individual seat per sixty (60) square feet of plaza area or open space. Response: Does not apply. 4A.10 Standard: The following areas shall not count as pedestrian -oriented space for buildings and developments with over thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of nonresidential uses: 1) The minimum required walkway. However, where walkways are widened or enhanced beyond minimum requirements, the area may count as pedestrian -oriented space if the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee determines such space meets the definition of pedestrian -oriented space. 2) Areas that abut landscaped parking lots, chain link fences, blank walls, and/or dumpsters or service areas. Response: Does not apply. 4A.11 Standard: Outdoor storage (shopping carts, potting soil bags, firewood, etc.) is prohibited within pedestrian -oriented space. Response: Does not apply. RHA Glenwood Townhomes — Page 13 of 20 Design District "D" Checklist RHA Glennwood Townhomes SPR: Item 9 4A.12 Standard: At each corner of the intersections listed below, a public plaza shall be provided: 1) Benson Area: Benson Drive S./108th Avenue S.E. and S.E. 1761h. 2) Bronson Area: Intersections with Bronson Way North at: a) Factory Avenue N./Houser Way S.; b) Garden Avenue N.; and c) Park Avenue N. and N. First Street. 3) Cascade Area: Intersection of 116th Avenue S.E. and S.E. 168th Street. 4) Northeast Fourth Area: Intersections with N.E. Fourth at: a) Duvall Avenue N.E.; b) Monroe Avenue N.E.; and c) Union Avenue N.E. 5) Grady Area: Intersections with Grady Way at: a) Lind Avenue S.W.; b) Rainier Avenue S.; c) Shattuck Avenue S.; and d) Talbot Road S. 6) Puget Area: Intersection of S. Puget Drive and Benson Road S. 7) Rainier Avenue Area: Intersections with Rainier Avenue S. at: a) Airport Way/Renton Avenue S.; b) S. Third Street/S.W. Sunset Boulevard; c) S. Fourth Street; and d) S. Seventh Street. 8) North Renton Area: Intersections with Park Avenue N. at: a) N. Fourth Street; and b) N. Fifth Street. 9) Northeast Sunset Area: Intersections with N.E. Sunset Boulevard at: a) Duvall Avenue N.E.; and b) Union Avenue N.E. Response: Does not apply. 4A.13 Standard: The public plaza shall measure no less than one thousand (1,000) square feet with a minimum dimension of twenty feet (20') on one side abutting the sidewalk. Response: Does not apply. 4A.14 Standard: The public plaza must be landscaped consistent with RMC 4-4-070, including at minimum street trees, decorative paving, pedestrian -scaled lighting, and seating. Response: Does not apply, s. a.RILaING ARCH L 99SIO I� n110, Aima�n + n� �' yin In cher> `_ M {. _d bo '14 "AIlrow to r0 # RHA Glenwood Townhomes — Page 14 of 20 Design District "D" Checklis RHA Glennwood Townhomes AZ11MMI, N 5A, Bufldlna Character and Massing Intent: To ensure that buildings are not bland and so that they appear to be at a human scale, as well as to ensure that all sides of a building which can be seen by the public are visually Interesting. Guidelines: Building facades shall be modulated and/or articulated to reduce the apparent size of buildings, break up long blank walls, add visual interest, and enhance the character of the neighborhood. Articulation, modulation, and their intervals should create a sense of scale important to residential buildings. 5A.1 Standard: All building facades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no more than forty feet (40'). Response: To begin with, each building has been limited to a front fagade width of 64'. The buildings are scaled down further with modulation of outboard units in each building being set back 2' by 16' wide to reduce the building scale and mass. This leaves a middle section that spans a total of 32' between the modulations. The combination of bays and front porches will further serve to provide a pleasant scale and proportion to the buildings. 5A.2 Standard: Modulations shall be a minimum of two feet (2') deep, sixteen feet (16') in height, and eight feet (8') in width. Response: See response to 5A.1 above. 5A.3 Standard: Buildings greater than one hundred sixty feet (160') in length shall provide a variety of modulations and articulations to reduce the apparent bulk and scale of the facade (illustration in District B, below); or provide an additional special feature such as a clock tower, courtyard, fountain, or public gathering area. Response: Does not apply. 5B. Ground Level Details Intent: To ensure that buildings are visually interesting and reinforce the intended human -scale character of the pedestrian environment; and ensure that all Sides of a building within near or distant public view have visual interest. Guidelines: The use of material variations such as colors, brick, shingles, stucco, and horizontal wood siding is encouraged. The primary building entrance should be made visibly prominent by incorporating architectural features such as a facade overhang, trellis, large entry doors, and/or ornamental lighting (illustration below). Detail features should also be used, to include things such as decorative entry paving, street furniture (benches, etc.), and/orpublic art. 58.1 Standard: Human -scaled elements such as a lighting fixture, trellis, or other landscape feature shall be provided along the facade's ground floor. Response: Front porches with bays and columns, side bays, and a change in siding at front and rear all contribute to scaling the buildings to the surrounding uses, and will become welcoming elements on the building facades. Exterior light fixtures will be selected that enhance the unit entries. RHA Glenwood Townhomes — Page 15 of 20 Design District "D" Checklist RHA Glennwood Sownhomes SPR: Item 9 58.2 Standard: On any facade visible to the public, transparent windows and/or doors are required to comprise at least fifty percent (50%) of the portion of the ground floor facade that is between four feet (4') and eight feet (8') above ground (as measured on the true elevation). Response: Does not apply. 58.3 Standard: Upper portions of building facades shall have clear windows with visibility into and out of the building. However, screening may be applied to provide shade and energy efficiency. The minimum amount of light transmittance for windows shall be fifty percent (50%). Response: Does not apply. 58.4 Standard: Display windows shall be designed for frequent change of merchandise, rather than permanent displays. Response: Does not apply. 5113.5 Standard: Where windows or storefronts occur, they must principally contain clear glazing. Response: Does not apply. 5113.6 Standard: Tinted and dark glass, highly reflective (mirror -type) glass and film are prohibited. Response: Does not apply. 5B.7 Standard: Untreated blank walls visible from public streets, sidewalks, or interior pedestrian pathways are prohibited. 1) A wall (including building facades and retaining walls) is considered a blank wall if: a) It is a ground floor wall or portion of a ground floor wall over six feet (6') in height, has a horizontal length greater than fifteen feet (15'), and does not include a window, door, building modulation or other architectural detailing; or b) Any portion of a ground floor wall has a surface area of four hundred (400) square feet or greater and does not include a window, door, building modulation or other architectural detailing. Response: Does not apply. RHA Glenwood Townhomes — Page 16 of 20 Design District "D" Checklisi RHA Glennwood Townhomes 5B.8 Standard: If blank walls are required or unavoidable, they shall be treated. The treatment shall be proportional to the wall and use one or more of the following: 1) A planting bed at least five feet (5') in width containing trees, shrubs, evergreen ground cover, or vines abutting the blank wall; 2) Trellis or other vine supports with evergreen climbing vines; 3) Architectural detailing such as reveals, contrasting materials, or other special detailing that meets the intent of this standard; 4) Artwork, such as bas-relief sculpture, mural, or similar; or 5) Seating area with special paving and seasonal planting. Response: Does not apply. SC. Buildina Roof tines Intent: To ensure that roof forms provide distinctive profiles and interest consistent with an urban project and contribute to the visual continuity of the district. Guidelines: Building roof lines shall be varied and include architectural elements to add visual interest to the building. 5C.1 Standard: At least one of the following elements shall be used to create varied and interesting roof profiles: 1) Extended parapets; 2) Feature elements projecting above parapets; 3) Projected cornices; and/or 4) Pitched or sloped roofs. 5) Roof mounted mechanical equipment shall not be visible to pedestrians 6) Buildings containing predominantly residential uses shall have pitched roofs with a minimum slope of one to four (1:4) and shall have dormers or interesting roof forms that break up the massiveness of an uninterrupted sloping roof. Response: The unit roofs are articulated with steep pitches (12:12) that scale down the apparent building size and create an interesting form. This approach was taken to give the buildings character and enhance the awareness of each individual unit. SD. Buildina Materials Intent: To ensure high standards of quality and effective maintenance over time and encourage the use of materials that reduce the visual bulk of large buildings, as well as to encourage the use of materials that add visual Interest to the neighborhood. Guidelines: Building materials are an important and integral part of the architectural design of a building that is attractive and of high quality. Material variation shall be used to create visual appeal and eliminate monotony of facades. This shall occur on all facades in a consistent manner. High quality materials shall be used. If materials like concrete or block walls are used they shall be enhanced to create variation and enhance their visual appeal. RHA Glenwood Townhomes — Page 17 of 20 Design District "D" Checkliste RHA Glennwood Townhomes SPR: Item 9 513.1 Standard: All sides of buildings visible from a street, pathway, parking area, or open space shall be finished with the same building materials, detailing, and color scheme. A different treatment may be used if the materials are of the same quality. Response: The buildings will primarily be sheathed in horizontal siding, with panel siding areas at front, rear, and at bays for added accent and visual interest. These materials will be installed as part of a rainscreen system and will be made from fiber -reinforced concrete with a 50 year predicted lifespan. Paint color will be an addition way to add visual interest. SD.2 Standard: All buildings shall use material variations such as colors, brick or metal banding, patterns or textural changes. Response: See response to 5D.1 above. The panel siding will be used on the front and rear facades in conjunction with window placement to create an interesting surface design. Window bays will also use this panel siding to accent their form. 513.3 Standard: Materials shall be durable, high quality, and consistent with more traditional urban development, such as brick, integrally colored concrete masonry, pre -finished metal, stone, steel, glass and cast -in-place concrete. Response: Does not apply, as this is a townhome development. However, siding will be composed of painted, fiber -reinforced concrete planks and panels with a 50 year predicted lifespan, 513.4 Standard: If concrete is used, walls shall be enhanced by techniques such as texturing, reveals, and/or coloring with a concrete coating or admixture. Response: Does not apply. SD.5 Standard: If concrete block walls are used, they shall be enhanced with integral color, textured blocks and colored mortar, decorative bond pattern and/or shall incorporate other masonry materials. Response: Does not apply. 5D.6 Standard: All buildings shall use material variations such as colors, brick or metal banding, patterns, or textural changes. Response: See response to 5D.1 above. The textural siding change will be an opportunity to include accent color. The end result will create a "clean" look that is visually interesting, RHA Glenwood Townhomes — Page 18 of 20 Design District "D" Checklist RHA Glennwood Townhomes SPR: Item 9 6,511300 Jv int,srd;; dditio CIO too) , ` ' lit#4 F, FyelRprho+rtttiwithin Urblen i al C ', ' #lid#�40. ddlilrlIllnrlilonli fond in iiMC '�I, urban d#1�I? heel !>N> + l l �l� 4 �i rorr it* found In RMC 4-4-1006" 040Ibhe.or I1.4 .. those prOpo��l�� art 0" il;orr* W41I 401n found irw RMC,43.100F, M041 #ion of Minimum Stondards. For 00poulls unON to tb Moet the modification criteria # variance I's re mind. Guidelines: Front -lit, ground -mounted monument signs are the preferred type of freestanding sign. Blade type signs, proportional to the building facade on which they are mounted, are encouraged on pedestrian -oriented streets. Alteration of trademarks notwithstanding, corporate signage should not be garish in color nor overly lit, although creative design, strong accent colors, and interesting surface materials and righting techniques are encouraged. 6A.1 Standard: Signage shall be an integral part of the design approach to the building. Response: Does not apply. Other than street address numbers at unit entries, no site signage is planned for the project. 6A.2 Standard: Entry signs shall be limited to the name of the larger development. Response: Does not apply. 6A.3 Standard: Corporate logos and signs shall be sized appropriately for their location. Response: Does not apply. 6A.4 Standard: In mixed use and multi -use buildings, signage shall be coordinated with the overall building design. Response: Does not apply. 6A.5 Standard: Freestanding ground -related monument signs, with the exception of primary entry signs, shall be limited to five feet (5') above finished grade, including support structure. All such signs shall include decorative landscaping (ground cover and/or shrubs) to provide seasonal interest in the area surrounding the sign. Alternately, signage may incorporate stone, brick, or other decorative materials as approved by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee. Response: Does not apply. RHA Glenwood Townhomes — Page 19 of 20 Design District "D" Checklist RHA Glennwood Townhomes SPR: Item 9 6A.6 Standard: All of the following are prohibited: 1) Pole signs; 2) Roof signs; and 3) Back -lit signs with letters or graphics on a plastic sheet (can signs or illuminated cabinet signs). Exceptions: Back -lit logo signs less than ten (10) square feet are permitted, as are signs with only the individual letters back -lit. Response: Does not apply. 7.11GHTING Intent To entyre #oW. Old security; plroruolte 11PubIr levels 1n peOstrlp� �,�� A ich IS plwaxo ed sari#n wellcx+ lYs, 00kins 0000ulldl lntrlpe, $}pd othli>!r pub11 plan p>1"'11 14111`1111111111 t visual attractiveness of tfii ere* it all Urnis . the day ohd night "� Guidelines: Lighting that improves pedestrian safety and also that creates visual Interest in the building and site during the evening hours shall be provided. 7A.1 Standard: Pedestrian -scale lighting shall be provided at primary and secondary building entrances. Examples include sconces on building facades, awnings with down -lighting and decorative street lighting. Response: There will be exterior lighting at unit front porch entries, unit rear patios, pathway lighting between buildings, and at the parking area. All lighting will be non -glare, directing light downward, for the benefit of creating good illumination and visual interest. 7A.2 Standard: Accent lighting shall also be provided on building facades (such as sconces) and/or to illuminate other key elements of the site such as gateways, specimen trees, other significant landscaping, water features, and/or artwork. Response: The project plans to use small, solar -powered LED lighting to provide accent circling around the flagpole in the rear yard. This will provide some small points of light that will demark the pole at night in a playful and interesting manner. 7A.3 Standard: Downlighting shall be used in all cases to assure safe pedestrian and vehicular movement, unless alternative pedestrian scale lighting has been approved administratively or is specifically listed as exempt from provisions located in RMC 4-4-075, Lighting, Exterior On -Site (i.e., signage, governmental flags, temporary holiday or decorative lighting, right -of -way -lighting, etc.). Response: See response to 7A.1 above. END OF DESIGN DISTRICT "D" CHECKLIST RHA Glenwood Townhomes - Page 20 of 20 P LOT COMBINATION Punning Division GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS AND APPLICATION JUN 3 2011 The revised code of Washington (RCW) Section 58.17.040 (6) allows for adjusting the boundary (combining) line between contiguous properties provided that: p • No additional parcels, sites, tracts, or lots are created; and UECEU V Eo • No parcels are established which have insufficient area or setbacks as required by zoning or other regulations. In order to insure that a Lot Combination meets these requirements, it must be reviewed by the Department of Community and Economic Development. Once approved, it must be recorded with the King County Recorder's Office. REQUIRED ELEMENTS OF A DECLARATION OF LOT COMBINATION (SEE SAMPLE COPY ATTACHED) ARE As FOLLOWS: 1. The Declaration of Lot Combination document must contain the complete and accurate legal descriptions (including any recorded easements along with the parcel number(s) of the Existing/Original. When completed, the document must contain the Notarized acknowledgements and signatures of ALL involved parties; 2. An accurate drawing of the Existing/Original and the Revised/Combined parcels, depicting the parcel number, the location of all roads, easements, structures, and other features. The drawing does not need to meet a particular scale, but it must be legible and clearly show property dimensions, distances from all structures to property lines, and an arrow pointing to the North. A clear one (1) inch margin shall be left on all four (4) sides of the drawing. Drawings should not exceed 8'/" x 14" in size. The existing/original lots must be labeled Parcel A, Parcel B, and so on; 3. Deeds, deeds of trust, or mortgage releases if ownership is being transferred; 4. "Declaration of Lot Combination" must be clearly filled in with dark ink printing or typing. The document must have exact State required margins as follows: 3" Top Margin, 1" on each Side and Bottom of the page (your return address can be within the 3" top margin). All other sheets must have 1' margins on both sides. Once drafted, the original proposed Lot Combination documents (including items 1 through 4 above) plus one (1) full copy shall be submitted to Department of Community and Economic Development along with any applicable processing fee'. In the application, be sure to attach the name, address, and phone number of the person who should be contacted when the Declaration of Lot Combination is ready to record or if a problem arises. When approved, the applicants are notified that four (4) copies of their Declaration of Lot Combination Documents are ready for recording with King County, along with necessary supportive documents such as an excise tax affidavit deed(s), deed(s) of trust, or mortgage releases. One (1) copy of the recorded document shall be returned to Development Services, and one (1) copy to the King. County Assessor's Office, to assure proper processing of the revised parcels. CAUTION: Applicants may wish to obtain a title report and have the Declaration reviewed by.a licensed land surveyor and/or title officer to ensure that all deeds, legal descriptions, and maps are correct and accurate. The accuracy of the Declaration and the associated deeds is the responsibility of the applicant. The City of Renton assumes no liability for any errors or complications that arise therefrom. Revised 05/20/09 h:\ced\data\forms-templates\self-help handouts\p1anning\1otcombo.doc City File Number APPLICATION FOR LOT COMBINATION City of Renton Department of Community and Economic Development NATURE OF REQUEST: Renton Housing Authority would like to combined both Parcel A and Parcel B into one lot for the mutual benefits to the described properties. Taxpayer/Owner Renton Housing Authority Phone: ( 42a) 226-1850 Address F.O. Box 2318 City/State Renton, Washington 98056-0316 Applicant Renton Housing Authority phone: (425)226-1850 Address F.O. Box 2318 City/State Renton, Washington 9805&0318 Agent " Joel Ing c/o Shelter Resources, Inc. Phone: 025) 454-8205 Address 2223 1121h Avenue NE, Suits 102 City/State Bellevue, Washington 98004 Parcel Data: Renton Highlands No. 2 Corrected Plat Site Address: 1147 Glennwood Avenue NE, Renton, WA 98056 Parcel M 7227801375 Location: Quarter Section NW Section 9 Township 23 Range 5 Related Parcels: 7227801375 - Parcel A 7227801380 - Parcel B Existing Zoning: R-14 Shoreline Environment: NIA Legal Description: Lot 9, Block 42, Corrected Plat of Renton Highland No. 2, accor'ding to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 57 of Plats, page (s) 92 through 98, inclusive, in King County, Washington. All dimensions must be shown, total square footage must be shown on revised lot drawing. Please list parcel numbers for the original lots. Revised 05/20/09 h:\ced\data\forms-templates\self-help hand outs\plan ni ng\lotcombo. doc Retum to: (applicant or contract purchaser) Renton Housing Authority P.O. Box 2316 Renton, WA 98056-0316 DECLARATION OF LOT COMBINATION - WHEREAS, the parties executing this document are the owners of the following described properties in the City of Renton, Washington, to wit: LOT 9, BLOCK 42, CORRECTED PLAT OF RENTON HIGHLAND NO, 2. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED Parcel "A" IN VOLUME 57 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 92 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, INKING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Parcel "B" LOT 10, BLOCK 42, CORRECTED PLAT OF RENTON HIGHLAND NO. 2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 57 PF PLATS, PAGE (S) 92 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON WHEREAS, the foregoing described properties have boundaries as shown on attached Legal Description Exhibit Map; and WHEREAS, the Revised Code of Washington Section 58.17.040 96) has provisions to allow for adjusting boundary lines between contiguous properties; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to the foregoing described properties, the parties do for themselves, their heirs, and assigns, revise the boundary lines of each parcel, with the boundaries to be as shown on attached Legal Description Exhibit Map, and described as follows: PARCEL "A" LOT 9 TOGETHER WITH LOT 10, BLOCK 42, CORRECTED PLAT OF RENTON HIGHLAND NO. 2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 57 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 92 THROUGH 98, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said parties hereto have caused this instrument to be executed this day of , 20 STATE OF WASHINGTON) )Ss. COUNTY OF KING) 1 certify that 1 know or have satisfactory evidence that is/are the person (s) acknowledged that he/she/they signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her their free and voluntary act fog the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED this Signature Print Name day of , 20 Title Appointment Expires All dimensions must be shown, total square footage must be shown on revised lot drawing. Please list parcel numbers for the original lots. Revised 05/20/09 h:\ced\dataVorms-tempIates\seIf-help hand outs\planning\lotcombo.doc ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ATTACHED TO AND MADE A PART OF: Declaration of Lot Combination STATE OF WASHINGTON County of } } SS: I, , Notary Public, certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Mark Gro er signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she/they are authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Executive Director of The Renton Housing Authority to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. Dated: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at , WA My appointment expires: [ Insert Maps/Drawings Here Must be drawn to scale f 0•�, 6f. pwlrt a[Y 1 h ' . Rtair ua rqq • .mau•J• a � e1py�O'tl� �' + 15 A r PARCEL A ) TL 727601376 Wf IF LOT 91U BCK 42j 'll ' RENTON HIGHLANO81 NO 2 CORRECTED PLAT' .t ,5 ZZ -7 b 013-15 1' , Y p• apa yL e'rW,., '1 •.h h .. � ua ar a ,x s • ,� ee„wn � ' � . au«ni J11 �h 1 I! I _, •� ww � � c.ae f ��:.•u PARCEL B �, •' i . a J ' TL 7221-13BO N. LOT 10 BLOCK 42 1 RENTON HIGHLANo9 No 2 CORRECTED PLAT 1 rr .val:. �LA1 C3f.� MINI J��. 4'•w`lakJ 1' � •(O[•[, •� 'k J Marl rH'.i n lrAOl - 1 � .. . .C.J6•• 11 d _� � PVW � All dimensions must be shown, total square footage must be shown on revised lot drawing. Please list parcel numbers for the original lots. Revised 05/20/09 h:\ced\data\forms-templates\self-help handouts\planning\lotcombo.doc REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT EDMONDS AND GLENNWOOD AVE NE RENTON, WA S&EE JOB NO. 1010 JANUARY 10, 2011 City Of Renton Planning Division "IN 3 0-1011 W E(CEU VED JAN RD i o l arpi S&EE 5&EE SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. 625 Redmond Wa e 4 Red W 'hi tnn 8Q52 425 8b8- 8585 68 January 10, 2011 Mr. Mark Gropper (mrg@rentonhousing.org) Renton Housing Authority Renton, WA CC: Mr. Joel Ing (Joeli@shelterresourcesine,com) Report of Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Residential Development Edmonds and Glennwood Ave NE Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Gropper. We are pleased to present herewith our Report of Geotechnical Investigation for the referenced project. Our services were authorized by Mr. Joel Ing on August 26, 2010, and have been provided in accordance with our proposal dated August 16, 2010. During the course of our investigation, the design added the multi- family building at the southwestern portion of the site. Since this building may include one to two levels of underground parking, we suggested a supplemental exploration program which includes 2 soil test borings. This additional work was approved by you on September 20, 2010. We appreciate the opportunity to provide our services. Should you have any question regarding the contents of this report or require additional information, please call. D� Q Very truly yours, SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. C. J. Shin, Ph.D., P.E. President S&EE t0iorpt r ks TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page-- 1.0 age I.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES....................................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS............................................................................................................................................ 2 3.1 SURFACE CONDITIONS................................................................................................................................ 2 3.2 PUBLISHED GEOLOGIC INFORMATION....................................................................................................3 3.3 TEST PIT AND BORING FINDINGS..............................................................................................................3 3.4 GROUNDWATER.............................................................................................................................................4 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................. 5 4.1 GENERAL........................................................................................................................................................5 4.2 FOUNDATION SUPPORT.................................................................................................................I............. 5 4.3 EXCAVATION SHORING.............................................................................................................................. 7 4.4 LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES ON PERMANENT RETAINING WALLS .................. B 4.5 SITE PREPARATION, STRUCTURAL FILL AND DRAINAGE.................................................................... 10 4.6 SLAB-ON-GRADE............................................................. ................................ ........ ....... I..... I.,.....................11 .. 4.7 FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT..............................................................................................................................11 4.8 TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EXCAVATIONS..................................................................................12 4.9 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS .......... ... ......... .......... .............................................................. I... I................... 12 4.10 ADDITIONAL SERVICES................................................................................................._....................... 13 FIGURE 1: SITE LOCATION MAP FIGURE 2: SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN FIGURE 3: WALL AND FOUNDATION DRAINS FIGURE 4: LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES FOR CANTILEVER SHORING WALLS FIGURE 5: CALCULATION OF SURCHARGE LOADS ON SUB -SURFACE WALLS FIGURE 6: UNDER -SLAB DRAIN APPENDIX A: FIELD EXPLORATION, LOGS, SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART 10iorpt AND KEY TO BORING LOGS S&EE 0 REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT EDMONDS AND GLENNWOOD AVE NE RENTON, WASHINGTON For Renton Housing Authority 1.0 INTRODUCTION We present in this report the results of our geotechnical investigation for the project. The site is located between Edmonds Avenue NE and Glennwood Avenue NE in Renton. A site location map is shown in Figure 1 which is included at the end of this report. We understand that the project will have the following elements and they may be constructed in phases. 1) A multifamily building in the south-western portion of the site. The building will be a 3 or 4 - story, wood -framed structure with one or two levels of underground parking. This basement will required a maximum excavation of about 10 to 20 feet below the current site grade. Basement excavation will likely be achieved with a combination of open cut and excavation shoring. 2) A multifamily building in the mid portion of the site. The building may be a 4 -story, wood - framed structure and have one level parking basement daylighting to the west. The basement will required a maximum excavation of about 10 feet below the current site grade. Basement excavation will likely be achieved with open cut. 3) Two townhome buildings (3 and 5 units) and surface parking in the eastern portion of the site. The buildings will be 3 -story, wood -framed structures, No basement is proposed and cut -and -fill is expected to be minimal. 4) A new access road connecting Edmonds Avenue NE and Glennwood Avenue NE. Based on our experience with similar buildings, we anticipate that the maximum column and wall loads will be on the order of 75 kips and 5 kips per lineal foot, respectively. 91 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of our study is to develop geotechnical recommendations regarding site development and foundation support. Specifically, our services included: I. Exploration of soil and groundwater conditions underlying the site by the excavation of 6 test pits and the drilling of two soil test borings. 2. Recommendations regarding type of foundation support. 3. Recommendations regarding construction shoring. 4. Recommendations regarding active and at -rest earth pressures to be used for the design of any retaining structures. 5. Recommendations regarding passive soil resistance and coefficient of friction for the resistance of lateral loads. b. Recommendations regarding temporary and permanent cut slopes. 7. Recommendations regarding support for stab -on -grade. 8. Recommendations regarding pavement design. 4. Recommendations regarding type of soil for seismic design. 10, Recommendations regarding site preparation, including removal of unsuitable soils, suitability of onsitc soils for use as fill, rill placement techniques, and compaction criteria. 11. Five copies of a written geotechnical report containing a site plan, exploration logs, a description of subsurface conditions, and our findings and recommendations. 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS 3.1 SURFACE CONDITIONS The site is located in a residential area. A rockery wall, about 10 to 12 feet in height, flanks the western site boundary along Edmonds Avenue NE. From the top of this wall eastward, the site grade rises with about 10- to l5 -percent slopes to the mid portion of the site. From there to Glennwood Avenue NE, the 101orpt 2 MEE site grades rise gently at about 5 to 10 percents. At the time of our field exploration, an existing townhome occupied the southeastern portion of the site and the rest of the areas are vacant. Site surface is covered with sparse trees, brushed and grass lawn. 3.2 PUBLISHED GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Published geologic information (Geologic Map of The Renton Quadrangle, King County, Washington by D.R Mullineaux, 1963) indicates that the site area is underlain by glacially deposited recessional outwash (Qpa). According to the map, the material consists chiefly of sand and gravel. 3.3 TEST PIT AND BORING FINDINGS The soil conditions underlying the site were explored by the excavation of 6 test pits, TP -1 through TP -6 on August 27, 2010 and the drilling of 2 soil test borings, B-1 and B-2 on October 28, 2010. The approximate locations of these explorations are shown on Figure 2 which is included at the end of this report. Details of the exploration program and the logs are included in Appendix A. The subsurface conditions are described in the following paragraphs: io10Tt Area of tbe, Proposed East Townhome Buildin TP -I and TP -6 The area is covered with about one foot of topsoil mixed with loose fill soil. The soil is underlain by a surficial layer that consists of a brown silty sand with trace amount of gravel and cobbles. The layer is about 2 to 3.5 feet thick and the material is loose to medium dense. The surficial layer is in turn underlain by a silty sand with gravel and cobbles. This soil is cemented and is dense to very dense. Based on its appearance and density, we believe this is glacially deposited till or commonly term hardpan. Both TP -I and TP -6 were terminated in till. Area of the Proposed Multifamily Building in Mid -Portion of Site TP- to TP -5 The subsurface conditions here are similar to the above except that the surficial layer is about 2 feet thick and a sandy soil was found below the till layer at TP -3. This sand is dense and includes silt lenses. 3 S&EE a] Area of the Protwsed Multifamily Buildingin n Southwestern Portion of Site (13-.1 and-B-2� The subsurface conditions here include a 1.5 -foot thick topsoil layer over a surficial layer that is 1.5 to 6.5 feet in thickness. This layer is medium dense to dense and overlies very dense glacial till. The till is in turn underlain by a stiff to very stiff silt at depths from 15 to 25 feet below the ground surface, Both borings encountered very dense glacial till below the silt. The borings were terminated at a depth of 30 feet in till. 3.4 GROUNDwKrFR Only minor (about 11100 gallon per minute) groundwater seepage was encountered in TP -3. The seepage occurred at a depth of 10 feet and appeared to perch over the relatively impermeable silt Ions. Wet soils were also encountered just above the silt layer in Boring B-1. Based on our experience with the similar soil conditions, we believe that groundwater may perch on the relatively impermeable silt in the wet winter months. The depth of the perched groundwater table may vary with season and precipitation. lt7lOrpt a S&EE 4,0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 43 GENERAL 1. Based on our investigation, we recommend that the proposed buildings be supported by conventional spread footings. Please note that loose to medium dense silty soils are present near the ground surface. if these materials are exposed at the footing subgrade, it must be properly prepared prior to concrete pour. Also, the soils near the ground surface are generally loose and very silty. These soils will lose their strength when wet and become muddy when disturbed. Therefore, earthwork will be difficult in the wet winter months as wet soil cannot be used for backfill, export of wet soil will be expensive, and erosion control will be difficult. 2. Minor groundwater seepage was encountered at a depth of 10 feet at TP -3. Based on this, we believe that the need of construction dewatering is unlikely. However, some localized wet zone may be exposed by basement excavation. For planning purposes, we recommend that tinder -slab drains be considered for basements. The purposes of these drains are to provide a stable work base and prevent future wet floor. 3. Except for the existing fill soil, the onsite soils are suitable for use as structural fill material. However, most of the soils are silty in nature and will require moisture -conditioning prior to use. Details of our recommendations are presented below. 4.2 FOUNDATION SUPPORT We recommend that the proposed buildings be supported by conventional spread footings which must penetrate the existing fill and be founded on at least medium dense native soils or re -compacted onsite soils. Recommendation details are presented below. Footing Construction 1. Prior to re -bar and concrete placement, all footing bearing surfaces must be cleaned of loose soils. Except for glacial till, the upper 12 inches of the footing subgrade soil should be re -compacted to at least 95% of its maximum dry density as determined using ASTM D-1557 test procedures. 101orpt 5 S&EE 2. All existing fill, wet, soft and organic soils encountered at footing subgrade should be over - excavated. The over -excavation should he backfilled with structural fill, concrete or compacted crushed rock. The criteria of structural fill are presented in Section 4.5 of this report. 3. All exterior footings should be founded at least 18 inches below the adjacent finished grade to provide protection against frost action, and should be at least 18 inches in width to facilitate construction. 4. All footing bearing surfaces must be inspected by a qualified geotechnical engineer prior to re -bars and concrete placements. The engineer should confirm the bearing capacity of the subgrade soil, and provide recommendations regarding repair, if necessary. Allowable Bearing Loads We recommend the following allowable bearing pressures for the footing designs: Footings at depths less than 5 feet from final grade: 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf) Footings at depths greater than 5 feet from final grade: 4,500 pounds per square foot (pst) The above bearing capacity values include a factor of safety of at least 3, and can be increased by one-third for wind and seismic loads. Settlement Interior column footings designed in accordance with the above recommendations are expected to experience approximately 112 inch of settlement. Continuous wall footings should experience settlement of about 1/4 to 112 inch. Differential settlement between adjacent footings is expected to be about 114 inch. The settlement will occur rapidly, essentially as the loads are applied. Lateral Resistance Lateral resistance can be obtained from the passive earth pressure against the footing sides and the friction at the contact of the footing bottom and bearing soil. The former can be obtained using an equivalent fluid density of 250 pounds per cubic foot (pef), and the latter using a coefficient of friction of 0.5. These values include a safety factor of 1.5. l D I Orpt 6 MEE 4.3 EXCAVATION SHORING Excavation for basements may be achieved with a combination of temporary cut slope and shoring. The temporary cut should be no steeper than I H: IV (Horizontal to Vertical). We recommend that the shoring be consisted of cantilever soldier pile with timber lagging. The soldier piles will consist of steel H -beams in drilled and grouted holes. As the excavation proceeds, timber lagging is installed between the H -beams. The voids behind the lagging must be filled with sand or pea gravel the same day lagging is installed. Un- filled voids may result in ground settlement behind lagging and thus severe damages to the neighboring buildings and properties. A permanent wail should be constructed in front of the temporary shoring wall. Drainage is provided by the instailation of a geotextile drain mat attached to the shoring wall. The drain mat should be hydraulically connected to an interior footing drain by 2 -inch diameter weep pipes that are spaced at 5 feet on center. (See Figure 3 for details) LATERAL LOADS AND RESISTANCES Figure 4 shows our recommended earth pressures for the design of cantilever shoring walls. Additional lateral earth pressures will result from foundation loads adjacent to the excavation; surcharge loads by traffic, storage and slopes next to the excavation. The lateral earth pressure due to foundation loads can be estimated using the method presented in Figure 5. Traffic and storage surcharges can be accounted for by increasing the effective height of the wall by 2 feet. Slope surcharges can be accounted for by increasing the effective height of the wall to equal 112 (one-half) of the height of the slope. LAGGING DESIGN For shoring areas that are not adjacent to existing building's, lagging can be designed using 54 percent of the lateral earth pressures presented above. Such stress reduction is due to the anticipated soil arching effects. No reduction should be used for shoring adjacent to any neighboring building. SHORING MONITORING A shoring monitoring program should be installed to verify the performance of the shoring system and to evaluate any possible excavation effects on the adjacent buildings and properties. Prior to the excavation, 1010nn 7 S&EE the existing conditions of the adjacent buildings and properties should be photographed and recorded. After the installation of the soldier piles and before mass excavation, a base line survey should be conducted. Once excavation begins, the vertical and horizontal movements of every other pile should be surveyed on a weekly basis. The weekly survey should continue until the bottoms of excavations are reached. Depending on the shoring performance and the constriction season, the geotechnical engineer may choose to relax the survey frequencies. All survey results should be transmitted to the office of the project geotechnical engineer within 24 hours after they are obtained. 4.4 LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES ON PERMANENT RETAINING WALLS Lateral earth pressures on permanent retaining walls, underground vaults or utility trenches/pits, and resistance to lateral loads may be estimated using the recommended soil parameters presented in the following table. Note: Hydrostatic pressures are not included in the above lateral earth pressures. The at -rest case applies to unyielding walls, and would be appropriate for walls that are structurally restrained from lateral deflection such as basement walls, utility trenches or pits. The passive earth pressure and coefficient of friction include a safety factor of I.S. The active case applies to walls that are permitted to rotate or translate away from the retained soil by approximately 0.002H to 0.004H, where H is the height of the wall. SURCHARGE INDUCED LATERAL LOADS 1) Additional lateral earth pressures will result from surcharge loads from floor slabs or pavements for parking that are located immediately adjacent to the walls. `Che surcharge -induced lateral earth 1010rpl 8 S&EE 777 - CoMiclent:;:: 9 r Eqivalent Fluid Unit Weight -(PCF} u of - ,•. :• 'Friction ,.RtBASB. Active At -rest Passive , Structural fill and 40 50 300 0.5 native soils Note: Hydrostatic pressures are not included in the above lateral earth pressures. The at -rest case applies to unyielding walls, and would be appropriate for walls that are structurally restrained from lateral deflection such as basement walls, utility trenches or pits. The passive earth pressure and coefficient of friction include a safety factor of I.S. The active case applies to walls that are permitted to rotate or translate away from the retained soil by approximately 0.002H to 0.004H, where H is the height of the wall. SURCHARGE INDUCED LATERAL LOADS 1) Additional lateral earth pressures will result from surcharge loads from floor slabs or pavements for parking that are located immediately adjacent to the walls. `Che surcharge -induced lateral earth 1010rpl 8 S&EE pressures are uniform over the depth of the wall. Surcharge -induced lateral pressures for the "active" case may be calculated by multiplying the applied vertical pressure (in psf) by the active earth pressure coefficient (Ka). The value of Ka may be taken as 0.4. The surcharge -induced lateral pressures for the "at -rest" case are similarly calculated using an at -rest earth pressure coefficient (Ko) of 0.5. For surcharge loads that are not adjacent to the wall, the induced lateral earth pressure will depend on the magnitude of the surcharge and the distance from the wall. Such induced lateral load can be estimated using the equations shown on Figure 5, 2) The slope -induced lateral earth pressure can be accounted for by increasing, the effective height of the wall by one-half the slope height. For back slope continues beyond a horizontal distance equal to the height of the wall, only the part of slope -rise within this horizontal distance should be considered. 3) The traffic -induced lateral earth pressure can 6e accounted for by increasing the effective wall height by 2 feet. SEISMIC INDUCED LATERAL LOADS Seismic induced lateral loads can be assumed to act at 0.7 H above the wall base and the magnitude can be calculated using the following equation: Pe = 318*7*H'*a Where Pe = seismic -induced lateral load 7 = soil density = 130 pcf H = wall height a = horizontal acceleration BACKFILL IN FRONT OF RETAINING WALLS Backfill in front of the wall should be structural fill. The material and compaction requirements are presented in Section 4.5 of this report. The density of the structural fill can be assumed to be 130 pounds per cubic feet. I3ACKF LL BEHIND R21AMG WALLS Backfill behind the wall should be free -draining materials which are typically granular soils containing less than 5 percent fines (silt and clay particles) and no particles greater than 4 inches in diameter. The density S&EE tatQrpc 9 of the backfill material can be assumed to be 125 pounds per cubic feet. The backfill material should be placed in 6 to 8 -inch thick horizontal lifts and compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum density in accordance with ASTM D-1557 test procedures. In the areas where the Fill will support pavement, sidewalk or slabs, the top two feet of the backfill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum density. Care must be taken when compacting backfill adjacent to retaining walls, to avoid creating excessive pressure on the wall. DRAINAGE BEHIND RETAINING WALLS Rigid, perforated drainpipes should be installed behind retaining walls. Drainpipes should be at least 6 inches in diameter, covered by a layer of uniform size drain gravel of at least 12 inches in thickness, and be connected to a suitable discharge location. An adequate number of cleanouts should be installed along the drain line for future maintenance. 4.5 SITE PREPARATION, STRUCTURAL, FILL AND DRAINAGE Site preparation should begin with proof -rolling subgrades using heavy construction equipment. Areas which are found to be wet, soft, or organic should be over -excavated. The geotechnical engineer should observe the proof -rolling to provide subgrade evaluation and over -excavation requirement, if needed. Atter stripping, over -excavation and excavation to the design grade, the top 12 inches of exposed subgrade soils should be re -compacted to at least 95% of their maximum dry density as determined using ASTM D- 1557 test procedures (Modified Proctor test). Structural EII can then be placed in the over -excavation and fill areas. The structural till materials should meet both the material and compaction requirements presented below. Material Requirements: Structural fill should be free of organic and frozen material and should consist of hard durable particles, such as sand, gravel, or quarry -processed stone. Except for the existing rill, the on-site soils are suitable for structural fill. Due to their silty nature, these soils are moisture -sensitive and should be moisture -conditioned to +/- 2% from their optimum moisture contents prior to use. Please note that the use of this material in wet seasons may be difficult. Suitable imported structural fill materials include silty sand, sand, mixture of sand and gravel (pitrun), and crushed rock. 1o1orpt 10 S&EE 4 All structural fill material should be approved by the geotechnical engineer prior to use Placement and Compaction Requirements: Structural fill should be placed in loose horizontal lifts not exceeding a thickness of 6 to 12 inches, depending on the material type, compaction equipment, and number of passes made by the equipment. Structural fill should be compacted to at least 45% of the maximum dry density as determined using the ASTM D-1557 test procedures. SITE llRAINAGE The site surface should be graded so that surface water is directed away from the structural areas. Standing water should not be allowed. Final site grades should be sloped away from the building unless the area is paved. Otherwise, yard drains should be installed to collect surface runoff. 4.6 SLAB -ON -GRADE All slabs can be soil supported. We envision that the soil at the subgrade will be disturbed and loosened by construction activities at the time of slab construction. We therefore recommend that the subgrade be proof -rolled or probed prior to pour. Any wet and loose areas should be over -excavated and backfilled with structural fill. We recommend that slab -on -grade be underlain by a 15 -mil. vapor barrier over at least 4 -inch thick free - draining gravel. As previously mentioned, basement excavation may encountered perch groundwater and under -slab drains may be necessary to avoid future wet basement. The under -slab drain includes a trench with a perforated drain pipe and gravel backfill. A cross-sectional view of the drains is shown in Figure 6. The drain lines are typically spaced at 15 to 20 feet on center. We recommend that a qualified geotechnical engineer observe the building subgrade and provide drainage details at the time of construction. 4.7 FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT We recommend that the subgrade for flexible pavement be prepared in accordance with the recommendations presented in Section 4.5. Based on the subsoil conditions, we believe that the prepared S&EE foIorpt ;1 PEA subgrade will have a California Hearing Ratio (CBR) of at least 12, We therefore recommend the following flexible pavement sections for light and medium traffic conditions: Dight traffic (Daily EAL = 5 or less): 2 inches asphaltic concrete over 6 inches base course Medium traffic (Daily EAL. = 20 to 80): 3 inches asphaltic concrete over 8 inches base course The base course should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D-1557 test method. The material should meet WSDOT aggregate specification 9-03.9(3) and have the following gradation: Sieve S'ze Percent Passing I '/4 -inch 100 518 -inch 50-80 1!4 -inch 30-50 LIS No. 40 3-18 US No. 200 7.5 max. % Fracture 75 min. 4.8 TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EXCAVATIONS For temporary excavations less than 3 feet in depth, the cut bank may be excavated vertically. For excavation deeper than 3 feet, the slope should be cut no steeper than IH:IV. The slope should continue from top to bottom (without a vertical bank at the bottom). Flatter slope cuts may be required if seepage occurs. Temporary cut should be protected from weather during the time of construction. All permanent slopes should be no steeper than 2H:1 V, Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any slope. Also, all permanent slopes should be seeded with the appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and maintain the slope stability. 4.9 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS We recommend that site class C as defined in the 2006 IHC he considered for the seismic design. The site is underlain by dense glacial till. As such, the liquefaction potential is negligible. 141 ocpt 12 S&EE M 4.10 ADDITIONAL SERVICES Additional services may be required during the design and construction of the project. We envision that these additional services may include the following: 1. Review excavation, foundation, and drainage (temporary and permanent) plans to confirm that our recommendations are properly interpreted and utilized in the design. 2. Monitor shoring installation and mass excavation. We will confirm that the contractor's equipment and procedures are adequate, and provide recommendations regarding dewatering and sidewall stabilization, if needed. 3. Monitor building subgrade conditions. We will evaluate the soil and groundwater conditions and provide recommendations regarding subgrade preparation and under -slab drains, if needed. 4. Monitor foundation subgrade preparation. We will confirm the bearing capacity of the subgrade soils, and will assist the contractor in evaluating the protection and over -excavation requirements, if any. S. Monitor the placement and compaction of structural fill. We will confirm the suitability of the fill materials, perform field density tests, and assist the contractor in meeting the compaction requirements. 6. Monitor the installation of subsurface drains. We will ensure these drains are installed in accordance with our recommendations. 7. Monitor site drainage and erosion control. 8. Other geotechnical issues deemed necessary. 13 S&EE 5.0 CLOSURE The recommendations presented in this report are provided for design purposes and are based on soil conditions disclosed by field observations and subsurface explorations. Subsurface information presented herein does not constitute a direct or implied warranty that the soil conditions between exploration locations can be directly interpolated or extrapolated or that subsurface conditions and soil variations different from those disclosed by the explorations will not be revealed. The recommendations outlined in this report are based on the assumption that the development plan is consistent with the description provided in this report. If the development plan is changed or subsurface conditions different from those disclosed by the exploration are observed during construction, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions, and if necessary, reconsider our design recommendations. iaiorpt q S&EE t,y K i �:•G�1ka! t Me(C(kr, - Ni _:) 13eiwporl °II�" r *, s' 9etga 8 ti 2 .�` Ot >1�t" I Y_'••n'Iitt yy F ((�li{0rdi0ux V,' \, 'i; ;� i. S. j 3;, i1 Coal`K"irseH ���r1 lllaTS `'. a, %W1 IMP Bjt Vy �]1 :1, err t Newcaslfa 1�} 3 jai` •us Ali: E;IffDt[101) '7F fl :5 } ir; ; r 4 t Nugg 'y�?��P ,iEtalt r 4 +� :'� '4r: 'arra {,} ' • t ;;i'�F' • ;.1 Beach ' >-Bark �.� ;.,� �� wa 's. � �f � �� I •, Y y �''1. �a k. ip fip3r iiv,OW }r�4' \j- r. s yi is i'r-'Y}k. ( ',}'I'Y•r t"" •,rem RA'i1?� .i/f�r 4a .gy- .i R4 SE 7 a , yt` y i u .� � it !► ll I �"t i 1� „'1z - r l ':r. •{�� - i. , "�' AlI East Renton_; ipft �°sFvrz i4dtltSt w ,y$I I �� �v�l � � '�� � r•�r4�"1� � ` r ; t �� Highlands Im !!rpleWaedGdf. 1 ti F �I- �f �lt�. �' � �t =F• ��-{ 1 r� Jr'+r���, 3 �I�j�Y f •Yl ��r`M�J� t !lt t, r Srr.r 5. .r. 'r v a F ` I. •I 1�., i t rr, i6 tr } l ` ae`'t89 l 4t, rf NNi L ..,I �. Mapl9 1 ' + "�` �; f �y ,t� » Cs ade F' rwogdy F�eirvrood Galt Helghts;Lske� t P andCnufty Deslre . 4 J s f i6 L��'��':' r , r{ r SfE i �;• , h..o•n,e;$E lU�rs St r+.xi3 _ �af4u n' ,.., .... / 1 �y • r .r Y , d` Figure 1 S&EE Site Location Map 3N GAV spuowP3 t la rt a ■ A a c VC N C Je ;a L-] 0 0 m CO) Ignore top two feet Passive Earth Pressure = 300 pcf Wing over 2 pile diameters Soldier Pile with Lagging Notes: Surcharge -induced lateral load must be added in the design. The magnitude can be estimated H using equations shown in Figure 5. (NOT -TO -SCALE) Lateral Earth Pressure above base of excavation = 40 pef acting over pile spacing Lateral Earth Pressure below base of excavation = 40(H) psf acting over one pile diameter Notes: 1) Traffic and storage surcharges can be accounted for by increasing the effective height of the wall by 2 feet. 2) Slope surcharge can be accounted for by Increasing the effective height of the wall by 112 (one-half) of the slope height 3) Passive pressure Includes a safety factor of 1.5. 4) Allowable vertical pile capacity: Skin Friction = 1,000 psf, End Bearing = 15,000 psf (safty factors = at least 2.0) 5) Subgrade reaction modulus = 200 pci (pounds per cubic inch) S&EE Job no.1010 Figure 4 Lateral Farth Pressures Cantilever Wall Shoring System 0.2 D.4 a :r 60.6 Id 0.8 ��►~�s,'m Pm@ 7m .e .4 6 VALUE OF CH (k) . t3 LINE LOAD Qt. XIMH FOR,, m. 10.4= �H (WL)� (0.16 Z=nH PHff 0.55 OL FOR m)O.41 H a {-)-_ 1.28m2n VFtH "L (m2 i.A2 RESULTANT PH=0.6— OL (m +I) PRESSURES FROM LINELOAD OL (BOUSSINESQ EQUATION MODIFIED BY EXPERIMENT) Reference: Foundations and Earth Structures, Des#gn Manual 7.2, Department of the Navy, May 1982 Es a 02 F, 00 A „ o 0A w 0.E &NOMINEE momm"11mamm MEMO an NONE mommamm 1.0 2 1.5 VALUE OF dH () POINT LOAD QP IQ I Yzmw X -n1{ PH H H R FOR m<0.41 H2 0.28n2 �H(V (Q16 ) FOR m )0.4 { 22 3._ 1,77 m2 n2 H Op (m2+n2)3 CrHOOS2(1.19) a $. � H K�mH SECTION A -A PRESSURES FROM POINT LOAD QP (BOUSSINESQ EQUATION MODIFIED BY EXPERIMENT) Calculation of Surcharge Loads on Subsurface Walls Figure 5 IP SLAB Vapor Barrier r.r.�•r.r.�.r•r•r•r•�.�..�.�.r.r.r•r.r.�•r•�.�.r.r.r.r.r.r.r.r.r. 4" BLANKET DRAIN (free -draining crushed rock) 5" Min. 4" DIA, PVC, PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE 0 0 p BACKFILL TRENCH WITH i" o c ° DRAIN G RAVE L a O0p000 31Min. O O0Cp0O opo p 0 0 0 o a 12" Min. (NOT -TO -SCALE) GENERAL Nome: i. DRAIN PIPE SHOULD BE CAPPED AT THE BEGINNING OF LINE. 2, INSTALL ADEQUADE NUMBER OF CLEANOUT FOR FUTURE MAINTENANCE. 3. DO NOT WRAP DRAIN PIPE WITH FILTER FABRIC. Figure 6 s&EE UNDER SLAB DRAINS (NOT TO SCALE) os wa ., h17at!,IN) i:�;l FIELD EXPLORATION AND LOGS The soil conditions underlying the site were explored by the excavation of 6 test pits, TP -1 through TP -6 on August 27, 2010 and the drilling of 2 soil test borings, B-1 and B-2 on October 28, 2010. The approximate locations of these explorations are shown on Figure 2 which is included at the end of this report. The test pits were excavated with a Kubota 080 excavator. A representative from S&EE was present throughout the exploration to excavate the pits and log the subsurface soil conditions. The soil test borings were advanced using it track -mounted drill rig. A representative from S&EE was present throughout the exploration to observe the drilling operations, log subsurface soil conditions, obtain soil samples, and to prepare descriptive geologic logs of the exploration. Soil samples were taken at 2.5- and 5 -foot intervals from the borings with procedures in accordance with ASTM D-1586, "Standard Method for Penetration Test and Split -Barrel Sampling of Soils" (1.4" I.D. sampler). The penetration test involves driving the samplers 18 inches into the ground at the bottom of the borehole with a 140 pounds hammer dropping 30 inches. The numbers of blows needed for the samplers to penetrate each 6 inches are recorded and are presented on the boring logs, The sum of the number of blows required for the second and third 6 inches of penetration is termed the "standard penetration resistance" or the "N -value". In cases where 50 blows are insufficient to advance it through a 6 inches interval the penetration after 50 blows is recorded. The blow count provides an indication of the densily of the subsoil, and it is used in many empirical geotechnical engineering formulae. All test pits were backfilled with the excavated soils which were placed in 2 -foot thick lifts and compacted with the excavator's bucket. Please note that if these test pits are located at the future footing locations, the top 4 feet of the backfill in the test pits should be removed, and the pits be backfilled with structural fill. All boreholes were backfilled with bentonite chips. The exploration logs aro presented in this appendix, A chart showing the Unified Soil Classification System is included at the end of this appendix. iotorpt S&EE 1E w0 - TEST PIT TP -1 Sea Desodptlon —0 TEST PIT TP -1 ClIenl: Renton Housing Authorlty Exploration Method; Kubota 080 Excavator Exploration Cate: August 27, 1010 Figure A-1 ,b &EE Proposed Development at Edmonds Ave NE and Glennwood Ave NE Topsoil with grass roots gM hark brown silty sand with bricks (dry)(loose)(fill) sM Brown, Ilght brown and gray silly very fine sand, trace fine to coarse gravel, trace cobbles (dry)(loose to medium dense) II! 2.61 1 1 1 -a pocket of brown fine to medium sand at 3.5 to 4.6 feet IES sin Gray and dark gray silty fine to coarse sand with fine to coarse gravel, trace cobbles ' ' 1 (molstXdense to very dens e)(camented)(gleclal till) I t> i II II - very dense and difficult digging below B feet Li I —j Excavation terminated at a depth of 6.5 feet. 1 1 1 No caving oocured during excavation. No groundwater encountered. 7.61 101---' --'---' --'---' ClIenl: Renton Housing Authorlty Exploration Method; Kubota 080 Excavator Exploration Cate: August 27, 1010 Figure A-1 ,b &EE Proposed Development at Edmonds Ave NE and Glennwood Ave NE 1z *.. TEST PIT TP -2 Soli Dewdp>Yon Brown and gray silty fine sand with trace fine to coarse gravel (dryXmedium dense) Gray and dark gray silty fine to medium sand with fine to coarse gravel (malst)(dense to very dens e)(cemented)(glacial till) - sandy below 10 feet Excavation terminated at a depth of 12 feet. No groundwater, no caving encountered during excavation. Client Renton Housing Authority Expiaratton Method: Kubota 080 Excavator Exploradon Data: August 27, 9010 Figure A-2 SUE proposed Development at Edmonds Ave NE and Glennwood Ave NE 1 1 � 1 • , t III Ill III I III ta, I I III 20: --- TEST PIT TP -2 Soli Dewdp>Yon Brown and gray silty fine sand with trace fine to coarse gravel (dryXmedium dense) Gray and dark gray silty fine to medium sand with fine to coarse gravel (malst)(dense to very dens e)(cemented)(glacial till) - sandy below 10 feet Excavation terminated at a depth of 12 feet. No groundwater, no caving encountered during excavation. Client Renton Housing Authority Expiaratton Method: Kubota 080 Excavator Exploradon Data: August 27, 9010 Figure A-2 SUE proposed Development at Edmonds Ave NE and Glennwood Ave NE So# Desodpdon .a TEST PIT TP -3 Brown and gray silty fine sand, sandy sift and thin lenses of fine sand (dry)(medium dense) Gray and dark gray silty fine to medium sand with fine to coarse gravel (molst)(dense to very dense)(cemented)(glacial till) gp/j Brown slightly silty fine sand with thin lenses of hard sill SM (slightly cemented)(moist to damp)(dense) - groundwater seepage (about if100 gpm) at 10 feet Excavation terminated at a depth of 12 feet. No caving enciountered during excavation. Groundwater seepage encountered at 10 feet. Client: Renton Housing Authority Exploration Method: Kubota 080 Excavator Exploration Data: August 27, 1010 Figure A-3 S&EE JProposed Development at Edmonds Ave NE and Glennwood Ave NE 1 I I I 1 S I 1 I 1 1 � 1 I 1 s 1 1 1 1 1 I { 1 I I , I 1 1 + 1 1 1 ' 201_ So# Desodpdon .a TEST PIT TP -3 Brown and gray silty fine sand, sandy sift and thin lenses of fine sand (dry)(medium dense) Gray and dark gray silty fine to medium sand with fine to coarse gravel (molst)(dense to very dense)(cemented)(glacial till) gp/j Brown slightly silty fine sand with thin lenses of hard sill SM (slightly cemented)(moist to damp)(dense) - groundwater seepage (about if100 gpm) at 10 feet Excavation terminated at a depth of 12 feet. No caving enciountered during excavation. Groundwater seepage encountered at 10 feet. Client: Renton Housing Authority Exploration Method: Kubota 080 Excavator Exploration Data: August 27, 1010 Figure A-3 S&EE JProposed Development at Edmonds Ave NE and Glennwood Ave NE TEST PIT TP -4 sou DeswlpNon Brown and gray silty fine sand and sandy silt (dry)(medium dense) Light gray to gray silty fine sand with fine to medium gravel (dry to moist)(dense to very dense)(cementedKglacial till) - very dense and difficult digging below 8 feet Excavation terminated at a depth of 8 feet. No groundwater, no caving encountered during excavation. Client: Renton housing Authority Exploration Method: Kubota 060 Excavator Exploration Date: August 27. 1010 Figure A-4 ,S&E Proposed Development at Edmonds Ave NE and Glenwood Ave NE G I � ' IIj 111 I ' I llI ill I I I 1 201 -L _-I__—' __I--' TEST PIT TP -4 sou DeswlpNon Brown and gray silty fine sand and sandy silt (dry)(medium dense) Light gray to gray silty fine sand with fine to medium gravel (dry to moist)(dense to very dense)(cementedKglacial till) - very dense and difficult digging below 8 feet Excavation terminated at a depth of 8 feet. No groundwater, no caving encountered during excavation. Client: Renton housing Authority Exploration Method: Kubota 060 Excavator Exploration Date: August 27. 1010 Figure A-4 ,S&E Proposed Development at Edmonds Ave NE and Glenwood Ave NE TEST PIT TP -5 sox aesodpHon Brown and gray silty fine sand with some fine gravel (dry)(loose to medium dense) Gray and dark gray silty fine to medium sand with fine to medium gravel, occasional cobbles (dry to moist)(dense to very dense Xcemented)(glacial till) - one boulder at 5 feet - very dense and difficult digging below B feet Excavation terminated at a depth of 12 feet. No groundwater, no caving encountered during excavation. Cllent: Renton Housing Authority Exploration Method: Kubota 080 Excavator Exploration Date: August 27, 1010 Figure A-5 SUE Proposed Development at Edmonds Ave NE and Glennwood Ave NE • , I , I I I ; I I • , I , I I • , '1 I , ' 1 —10; 20 TEST PIT TP -5 sox aesodpHon Brown and gray silty fine sand with some fine gravel (dry)(loose to medium dense) Gray and dark gray silty fine to medium sand with fine to medium gravel, occasional cobbles (dry to moist)(dense to very dense Xcemented)(glacial till) - one boulder at 5 feet - very dense and difficult digging below B feet Excavation terminated at a depth of 12 feet. No groundwater, no caving encountered during excavation. Cllent: Renton Housing Authority Exploration Method: Kubota 080 Excavator Exploration Date: August 27, 1010 Figure A-5 SUE Proposed Development at Edmonds Ave NE and Glennwood Ave NE TEST PIT TP -6 5o!! Descdp8on Brown, light brown and gray silty very fine sand, trace fine to coarse gravel, trace cobbles (dry)(loose to medium dense) Gray and dark gray silty fine to coarse sand with fine to coarse gravel, trace cobbles (molstXdense to very denseKcemented)(glacial till) Excavation terminated at a depth of B feet. No caving occured during excavation. No groundwater encountered. CAent: Renton Housing Authority Exploration Method: Kubota 080 Excavator Exploration Date: August 27, 1010 Figure A-6 SHE Proposed Development at Edmonds Ave NE and Glennwood Ave NE rQ 1 I 1 ; 1 Ill III 111 - 111 I11 1 1 f TEST PIT TP -6 5o!! Descdp8on Brown, light brown and gray silty very fine sand, trace fine to coarse gravel, trace cobbles (dry)(loose to medium dense) Gray and dark gray silty fine to coarse sand with fine to coarse gravel, trace cobbles (molstXdense to very denseKcemented)(glacial till) Excavation terminated at a depth of B feet. No caving occured during excavation. No groundwater encountered. CAent: Renton Housing Authority Exploration Method: Kubota 080 Excavator Exploration Date: August 27, 1010 Figure A-6 SHE Proposed Development at Edmonds Ave NE and Glennwood Ave NE .f 1 ,1e , 1 3 , 10 2 1 ' I ' 6 ' ; 4 '1a j to '10 10, X21 +12 ; ' Iso' 12 1 161 ' 2411s' 22 14 k� 1 A 20 I 5P sou Descdgan BORING B-1 sM Brown and gray silty fine sand, sandy slit and thin lenses of fine sand (damp)(medlum dense) SMI Gray slity fine sand with some fine to medium gravel (damp)(very dense)(glacial tin) 111 IIII 1111 1111 wet at 15 feet MLI Brown silt with lenses of fine sand (very stiff)(moist) (Boring log continues an Figure A -7b) Client: Renton Housing Authority Drilling Method: T-tD HSA advanced by track -mount Diedrich D-50 Drill Rlg Sample Method. SPT sampler driven by 1404b auto hammer Drill Contractor. October 28, 2010 Drill Date: Holocene Drilling Figure A -7a SUE Proposed Develpment at Edmonds Ave and Giennwood Ave Job k 1010 xt � —o 1 ,1e , 1 3 , 10 2 1 ' I ' 6 ' ; 4 '1a j to '10 10, X21 +12 ; ' Iso' 12 1 161 ' 2411s' 22 14 k� 1 A 20 I 5P sou Descdgan BORING B-1 sM Brown and gray silty fine sand, sandy slit and thin lenses of fine sand (damp)(medlum dense) SMI Gray slity fine sand with some fine to medium gravel (damp)(very dense)(glacial tin) 111 IIII 1111 1111 wet at 15 feet MLI Brown silt with lenses of fine sand (very stiff)(moist) (Boring log continues an Figure A -7b) Client: Renton Housing Authority Drilling Method: T-tD HSA advanced by track -mount Diedrich D-50 Drill Rlg Sample Method. SPT sampler driven by 1404b auto hammer Drill Contractor. October 28, 2010 Drill Date: Holocene Drilling Figure A -7a SUE Proposed Develpment at Edmonds Ave and Giennwood Ave Job k 1010 F , 20 o'i1 1w c`� BORING B-1 (Continued) Solt Aasodption — ; a0 11 11 SM Gray silty fine sand with some tine to medlum gravel (dampxvery dense)(glaclal tlll) I I Ilii I , I -2$ 5W 5 ® IIII -� Illi 30 Sot 6 �® Boring terminated at a depth of 30 feet No groundwater encountered during drilling. —38, —401 --- __,__ Client: Renton Housing Authority Drilling Method: 3"40, HSA advanced by track -mount Diedrich D-50 Drill Rig Sample Method: SPT sampler driven by 140 -lb auto hammer Dr81 Contrector- October 28, 2010 Drill Date: Holocene Drilling Figure A -7b SUE Proposed Develpment at Edmonds Ave and Glennwood Ave Job Na 1010 0 BORING B-2 C-4 so# pescrlpllon 1s z sM Topsoil with roots + sM Brown and gray silty fine sand with trace Fine gravel (damp)(medlum dense to dense) + SM Gray silty fine sand with some fine to medium gravel (dampXvery densa)(glactal till) IIII a 15 +17 IIII + 1e 10 i IIII IIII -14i ' Illi �2a ;ia ill l IIII Illi Illi . ML Brown sandy silt with lenses of wet fine sand (stiff)(moist) 113 1 'a tai , -ZO.---'--+---' -- (Boring log continues on Figure A -8b) Client: Renton Housing Authority Drilling Method: 3*4D HSA advanced by track mount Diedrich D-60 Drill Rig Sample Method: SPT sampler driven by 140 -lb auto hammer Drill Contractor. October 28, 2010 Drgl Date: Holocene Drilling Figure A -8a SUE Proposed Develpment at Edmonds Ave and G[ennwood Ave Job No. i010 BORING B-2 (Continued) So# Desedptlon ML I Brown sandy slit (molst)(very stlff) SiN Gray silty fine sand with some tine to medlum gravel (damp)(very dense)(glacial till) Boring terminated at a depth of 30 feet. No groundwater encountered during drilling. Gwent: Renton Housing Authority Drilling Method: T -ID HSA advanced by track -mount Diedrich D-50 Drill Rig Sample Method: SPT sampler driven by 140 -lb auto hammer Drill Contractor. October 28, 2010 Drill Date: Holocene Drilling Figure A -8b SUE Proposed Develpment at Edmonds Ave and Glennwood Ave Job Na 1010 is 1.1-6 I 1 1 1 I ' I ' isI i 17 -12 1 12 � E B' 1 (r 1 JQIt601 1 1 9 1 5 1 I I I k -36; 1 1 1 I 1 1 _481_- BORING B-2 (Continued) So# Desedptlon ML I Brown sandy slit (molst)(very stlff) SiN Gray silty fine sand with some tine to medlum gravel (damp)(very dense)(glacial till) Boring terminated at a depth of 30 feet. No groundwater encountered during drilling. Gwent: Renton Housing Authority Drilling Method: T -ID HSA advanced by track -mount Diedrich D-50 Drill Rig Sample Method: SPT sampler driven by 140 -lb auto hammer Drill Contractor. October 28, 2010 Drill Date: Holocene Drilling Figure A -8b SUE Proposed Develpment at Edmonds Ave and Glennwood Ave Job Na 1010 4 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION j (STEM DESCRIPTION GW WELL -GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL -SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL -SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES GM SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -SAND -SILT MIXTURES V YEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -SAND -CLAY TURES LL -GRADED SANn OR GRAVELLY SANDS, LE OR NO FINES ORLY-GRADED SANDS OR GRAVELLY SANDS, TLE OR NO FINES III SM SILTY SANDS, SAND -SILT MIXTURES SC CLAYEY SANDS, SAND -CLAY MIXTURES ML INORGANIC SILTS, VERY FINE SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE BANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY CL INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS OL ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILT -CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY MH INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOU SANDY OR SILTY SOILS, ELASTIC SILTS CH INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAYS OH ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS PT PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS Q DEPTH OF GROUNDWATER DURING DRILLING S&EE MAJOR DIVISIONS CLEAN �. GRAVELS Oo GRAVELS p f WITH FINES c� Lu A FINES) CLEAN; 9 SANDS Na FINES 4 SANDS Z v A N WITH FINES A! WPPRECiAflLE li W [1 OF FINER) SILTS & CLAYS p`' LICUO LIWT LESS THAN 60 c i 0 ; SILTS & CLAYS z r LIWIaOMITnREATF7tTNAMf50 ti 0 HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS KEY TO SAMPLES ® INDICATES DEPTH OF STANDARD PENETRATION TEST SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART AND KEY TO BORING LOG SM- M94 3 f Chicago 11de Insurance Company Renton Planning Division COMMITMENT FOR' TrrLE INSURANCE JUN 'all BY RECEW .Chicago Mde Insurance Company �� Chicago Title Insurance Company, a Missouri corporation (" Company's, for a valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Pro- posed Insured named in Schedule -A. as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land described or referred to. in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Require- ments; all subject to the provisions of Schedule A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company. All liability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate G months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the fair to issue the policy or policies is not -the fault of the Company. The Company will provide .a sample of the policy form upon nest. IN WITNESS MMEOF; Chicago Tide Insurance Company has caused 'its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. Chicago 77ftle Insurance Company ..y FORM I2 -6T6 CM ALMWMn*OMW - WW CONDITIONS 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquired actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B ha eof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions. 3. LJability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance heron in ung in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements bereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions, shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commiuvent. In no event shall, such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy oz policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisionA and Conditions and the 8xelusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the pmpoW Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified hmvdn. 4. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the e$tate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment nivabe based on and arc subject to the provisions of this Commisment. 5. 77a polity to be (sued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amounts of lwurwx a Is $2,0001t7( O or less shall be arbitrated at the option gf'ei*r the Company or the Insured as the exclusive mmady of the parity. You may review a copy o}the arbitration rules at <hup.1*,w .alta.orgh. FORM 71:-" (W ALTA oommimcat - 2006 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 701 RMAVW&gU #7300,SEATEU3,WA 98104 A.LT.A. comes NIENT SCHEDULE A Order No.: 1312022 Title Unit: U.06 Customer Number: RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY Phone. (206)628-5610 Buyer(s): F= (206)62&9717 Officar: SAVMIS/CAMPBELL/EISENBREY/HARRIS Commitment Effective Date: AUGUST A 2010 at 8:00 A.M. 1. Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Owner's Policy Amount: $ o . o o EXTENDED POLICY (6/17/2006) Premium: OWNERS EXTENDED RATE Tam Proposed Insured: Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Loan Policy Amount: - $ 0 . o o EXTENDED POLICY (6/17/2006) Premium' SIMULTANEOUS LOAN RATE Tax Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Loan Policy Amount: $ 0. o 0 Premium: Proposed Insured: Tam 2. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this Commitment is: FEE SIMPLE 3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is at the effective date hereof vested in: RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ALSO APPEARING OF RECORD AS HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF RENTON 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT /XLC/u-1M CHICAG0 TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A. COMMT>'MMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 1312022 Your No.: RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EDG13BIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) PARCEL At LOT 9, BLOCK 42, CORRECTED PLAT OF RENTON HIGHLAND NO. 2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 57 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 92 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL Bt LOT 10, BLOCK 42, CORRECTED PLAT OF RENTON HIGHLANDS NO. 2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 57 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 92 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL Ct THE SOUTH HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE SOUTH 75 FEET THEREOF; EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR EDMONDS AVENUE NORTHEAST. Cil !� • �I[��������' �a u_I' �_�! A.L.TAL COMMITM ENT SCIED=B Order Na: 1312022 Your No.: REtn'ON HOUSING AUTHORITY Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain ezeeptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A. Rights or claims of parties in possession, or claiming possession, not shown by the Public Records. B. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting. the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. C. Easements, prescriptive rights, rights -cif -way, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereat, not shown by the Public Records. D. Any lien, or right to a lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' eotapensation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as imposed by law, and not shown by the Public Records. E. Taxes or special assessments which are not yet payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the. Public Records. F. Any lien for service, installation, connection, maintenance, tap, capacity, or construction or similar charges for sewer, water, electricity, natural gas or other trtrt'es, or for garbage collection and disposal not shown by the Public Records. a. Unpatented mining claims, and all rights relating thereto; reservations and eaeeptions in United States Patents or in Ads authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. H. water rights, claims or title to water. I: Defects, liens, encumbranoes, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the Public Records, or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Cammitment. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOLLOW WLTA00M bk m/1-rM A B C 0 E F CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY AJ,TA. COQ -NT SCHEDULE B (C=tinued) Order No.: 001312022 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PURPOSE: SLOPES, SIDEWALK AND ROCKERY AREA AFFECTED: THE WEST 5 FEET OF PARCEL C OF SAID PREMISES RECORDED: JULY 5, 1972 RECORDING NUMBER: 7207050453 2. RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN DEED FROM NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY: RESERVING AND EXCEPTING FROM SAID LANDS SO MUCH OR SUCH PORTIONS THEREOF'AS ARE OR MAY BE MINERAL LANDS OR CONTAIN COAL OR IRON, AND ALSO THE USE AND THE RIGHT AND TITLE TO THE USE OF SUCH SURFACE GROUND AS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR GROUND OPERATIONS AND THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO SUCH RESERVED AND EXCEPTED MINERAL LANDS, INCLUDING LANDS CONTAINING COAL OR IRON, FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPLORING, DEVELOPING AND WORKING THE SAME. RECORDING NUMBER: 342731 3. RIGHT OF THE PUBLIC TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON SAID PREMISES IN THE REASONABLE ORIGINAL GRADING OF STREETS, AVENUES, ALLEYS AND ROADS AS DEDICATED IN THE PLAT. AFFECTS: PARCELS A AND B 4. MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8408209010, AS FOLLOWS: DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN NORTHERLY, WESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY PROPERTY BOUNDARIES OF PARCEL A OF -SAID PREMISES AND THE LOCATION OF FENCES. 5. MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20041011900001, AS FOLLOWS: GT.TA�CA/B1 /RM/09D9 . CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.I«TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B {Continued} Order No.: 1312022 Your No.: RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY SPECIAL EXCEP'T'IONS DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN NORTHERLY, EASTERLY AND SOUTHERLY PROPERTY BOUNDARIES OF PARCEL C OF SAID PREMISES AND THE LOCATION OF FENCE LINES. G 6. OUR INSPECTION ON DECEMBER 7, 2009, DISCLOSED THE FOLLOWING MATTERS: POSSIBLE ENCROACHMENT OF CONCRETE SLAB AND CHAIN LINK FENCE ONTO NORTHERLY ADJOINING PROPERTY, FOR WHICH WE FIND NO RECORDED EASEMENT. N AFFECTS: PARCEL B I 7. PAYMENT OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX, IF REQUIRED. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SITUATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF LOCAL TAXING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF RENTON. PRESENT RATE IS 1.784. ANY CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE OFFICIAL WASHINGTON STATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT. THE APPLICABLE EXCISE TAX MUST BE PAID AND THE AFFIDAVIT APPROVED AT THE TIME OF THE RECORDING OF THE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTS. (NOTE: A DEED EXEMPT FROM EXCISE TAX IS STILL SUBJECT TO THE $5.00 TECHNOLOGY FEE AND AN ADDITIONAL $5.00 AFFIDAVIT PROCESSING FEE). J S. THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED IS CARRIED ON THE TAX ROLLS AS EXEMPT. HOWEVER, IT -WILL BECOME TAXABLE ON THE DATE OF THE EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE TO A TAXABLE ENTITY AND SUBJECT TO THE LIEN OF REAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE BALANCE OF THE YEAR FROM THAT DATE. TAX ACCOUNT -NUMBERS: 722780-1375-00, 722780-1380-03 AND 092305-9080-03 LEVY CODE: 2100 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ NOT DISCLOSED ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENT: $ NOT DISCLOSED X 9. SPECIAL TAXES FOR SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT AND/OR OTHER SPECIAL CHARGES: 1ST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1ST, 2ND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1ST: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) YEAR: AMOUNT BILLED: AMOUNT PAID: AMOUNT DUB: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: L AFFECTS: PARCEL A Order No.: 1312022 Your No.: RENTON WING AO'!'iiQAITY SPECL4JL EXCEPTIONS 2010 $ 12.08 $ 12.08 $ 0.00 722780-1375-00 2100 H 10. SPECIAL TAXES FOR SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT AND/OR OTHER SPECIAL CHARGES: IST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1ST, 2ND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1ST: YEAR: AMOUNT BILLED: AMOUNT PAID: AMOUNT DUE: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: N AFFECTS: PARCEL B 2010 $ 12.08 $ 0.00 $ 12.08 722780-1380-03 2100 0 11. SPECIAL TAXES FOR SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT AND/OR OTHER SPECIAL CHARGES: 1ST HALF DELINOUENT MAY 1ST, 2ND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1ST: YEAR: AMOUNT BILLED: AMOUNT PAID: AMOUNT DUE: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: P AFFECTS: PARCEL C 2010 $ 12.39 $ 12.39 $ 0.00 092305-9080-03 2100 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COQ SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1312022 Your No.: RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY Q 12. UNRECORDED LEASEHOLDS, IF ANY, RIGHTS OF VENDORS AND HOLDERS OF SECURITY INTERESTS ON PERSONAL PROPERTY INSTALLED UPON SAID PROPERTY AND RIGHTS OF TENANTS TO REMOVE TRADE FIXTURES AT THE EXPIRATION OF THE TERM. R 13. ANY INSTRUMENT TO BE EXECUTED BY RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MUST BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATUTE. SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE OF AUTHORITY MUST BE SUBMITTED. S 14. TITLE IS TO BE VESTED IN PERSONS NOT YET REVEALED AND WHEN SO VESTED WILL BE SUBJECT TO MATTERS DISCLOSED BY A SEARCH OF THE RECORDS AGAINST THEIR NAMES. 7 15. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS COMMITMENT IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS AS DEFINED IN THA POLICY TO ISSUE. THE PARTIES TO THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRIOR TO CLOSING IF THE DESCRIPTION DOSS NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. U 16. TO PROVIDE AN EXTENDED COVERAGE OWNER'S AND LENDER'S POLICY GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A THROUGH D WILL BE CONSIDERED WHEN OUR INSPECTION AND/OR REVIEW OF SURVEY, IF REQUIRED, IS COMPLETED. A SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT WILL FOLLOW. IF THE ANTICIPATED CLOSING DATE IS LESS THAN 4 WEEKS FROM THE DATE OF THIS COMMITMENT, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR TITLE OFFICER IMMEDIATELY. V 17. PRIOR TO ISSUING AN EXTENDED FORM OWNER'S POLICY THIS COMPANY REQUIRES THAT THE PARTIES TO THE TRANSACTION PROVIDE AN ALTA/ACSM CERTIFIED, AS -BUILT SURVEY. v NOTE 1: IN THE EVENT THE OWNER'S POLICY COVERAGE IS CHANGED FROM EXTENDED TO STANDARD COVERAGE A CHARGE OF $215.00, PLUS $20.43 SALES TAX, WILL BE ADDED TO COVER THE COSTS RELATING TO THE EXTENDED COVERAGE INSPECTION. X NOTE 2: EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1997, DOCUMENT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN IMPOSED BY WASHINGTON LAW. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE COUNTY RECORDER OR IMPOSITION OF A $50.00 SURCHARGE. .. K. _ . CLTACWB/RMA/0M CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA- COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1312022 Your No.: RENPON HOUSING AUTHORITY SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOR DETAILS OF THESE STATEWIDE REQUIREMENTS PLEASE VISIT THE KING COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE WEBSITE AT WWW.METROXC.GOV/RECELEC/RECORDS AND SELECT ONLINE FORMS AND DOCUMENT STANDARDS. THE FOLLOWING; MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK 42, VOLUME 57 OF PLATS, PAGE 92; AND PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9-23-5. END OF SCHEDULE B :i'.. CLTAMAnwraAIm CHICAGO nt� INSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH AVENUE, #2300, SEATTLEt WA 98104 PHONE: (206 10 FAX: (?06� 17 IMPORTANT: This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a couvenicuce to locale the land indicated hereon witl reference to streets and other land. No liab�7ity is assumed by reason of reliance bet It. PTN 'OF THE NW % OF THE NW / OF SECTION 9-23-5 =_.tUplu w! 1r 1 ' �ll.17� 17[IVSSS ' lit fit" 1111T. ■.1 Hi14 E 355 1!E 12DI'ST III" AMC. K.1 list1[ [� !� 0 ![[7/ ��� >0 T.G.O. 1 Ill inic� 2 n Z 1cto 45 4350/ " 9187 i o x•.. ..t .�� 14307 or t4g! /501�io /r.iii A [KG...._. ...177/0 sr ` riot s7 /7541 y.,11300 /[ 407� 4uu sr43sa1 1.17fox 4350/}loll / !3 110!7 of 1447s01 1116 . e 4t q l.4 I 14100 /f 712 1r • r 4370, Pi 14. mA w /itllsi tr.i V ,, K r Vol 141471E F / z 11/5 d7 K 14 14 16 M q I 11151 sr •4:701 >•/!4'! �ji � i 7 !•1[ ^. �' 10 I r 03-f3. i1 •r , r .e- X K r 15 B 3.3/ AC 313 1 ' [3Ul ' I /.sl L.C. [55/3! " 11 �: n w 17640 1 i Y 11-0'47'1 •� F 7/.77 •0110 171! !7 •53 N 1M e �r 4 ail. s �/-Sl-1i t: js — 12 177u sr 31-1 City of Renton Planning Division JUN 3 0 1011 RECEONED 0 E2@58986 1?rled for RoaQrd at Rcgaest of RAWeOl OF cat Ilil'• *r OLD REPUBLICTl'1LE & ESCROW GRTrCB e . UA- STATMRY WAPMANW DEW MM GRAWORM GEORGE B. URY, a mcrried moa as leis sop de state, tr and in maderahan of Tca Dollars and other good and vdublc mmWwsdm% Tea Dollars ad other - goad sad valaaWo omudmWm is had paid► wavey aad warrants to RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY, a manidpal aarporatloa, tke U wing desmnbed noel astaA sttaatod m the Cu* ofKm& Stade of Washington sr o 10 9, Block 42, Cmaded Plat, Renton lb9blands No 2, wmdtog to the plot thcroofro=dW m Vcl=e 57 Of Plats, Page 92, r000rds of King Cloanty, Waahmgtoa SUBJWr TO Eu=cn% ResarvMkms, Cu amMs, Coaftons, Restrlcdana snd Agrocm" ofm=d, d ROY, indadmg those sham an any rewrdod plat or survey Assesaor's PrwortyTsx ParcWAcwwt Namber 722780.1375.00 L,PB-10(c) 7197 m3 % - 0 2004073 1 01485.002 Dated July 27, 2004 r.. STATE OF COUNTY OF 1 14) I certify that Y know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, aad said person wlmowledgod that he sWed flus bsftn d and aclmowledged it to be his frac and vohnrtary act for the uses and purposes n=Woaed m this mit „ Name eA M&AT Oma Notary Pubhc m and for the state of My appokhrmtt amn Sid, 9- s 0 zoost2lt�m.�o1 20 91216 00370 WHeN WOOF=FOURN TO I , ds HOUSM NJ HOFM OF THE COY OF Ra[TO PA.0 ull WRON "To""m E2421798 six A;M:a CHICAGO TrME INSURANCE CDOMPANY4kt3 t2D70�t .,� STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED 1 THE [1ltANT'[lR(S� f THMW A OALPAY.A9 H13 COWIM OTATE for aad In omsklCF&LkM Of TEN OML4M*N0gTHERti W N010u. A8LEC0118) MTlON in hand POK coomp Md wMads to HOWNO AUTHMM OFTHE CITY OF AKRON Iha fnllo % dc=ibcd real mwo skuucd la tk CwAoty of we &Trio dwll,liogaa: LOT 14OLOOK42.COlR=WPLATOFFBMWHKRLV 6NQRAODOPMOTOTHEPLATTHMW REOOFOEDNVOLUME ROFPLATS,PA"Ew027HPO HWNC AWLNPCOOIMTY,tAV*KffM aT UMTMDWWMEETFCMCNAT%ACHECMWwNADIYMRTSMUMA PMT HEIWAB V FL LLY NOCNGFWW H MX ToAMUW Nmmbw(oy JIM- alm Ddud: DBZMIBM I1. M Y xoost�eooC970.00z STATE OF NASHINOTON :Xrm COUNTY OF KIND�ON THIS DAY OF DRCMRR. 2009 M. THE UNDER$IONED. A VOTARY VUSLIC IN AND FOR TEE STATE OF MAENIA m)u. DULY COWTOBIMM AHD SWORN, VEEeOK"Y AV?EARED THOMAS 0. DWAY KWOMN TO NO TO EE THE INAMMAWSI DESCRIBED IE AND WHO ExBW= THE MITNIN IMMWMBITT AND ACINMZDOED THAT NE STONED AND SEAL THE SAME AS HIS FREE AND VOLOHTARY ACT AND DEED, FM THE USES AND VURMW NERSTE NENMONED. NOTARY SIGNATURE P3tnT xD NAME NOTARY VURLIC I FOR TIDi aTA7E OF 11ABHD1GY1 REEIDINO AT t MY COMMIESIGN 9XVznEs +�T'R) 4! or wi lb 0 20091216000=AOS DUCAGO T= iNSURANC6 COMPANY WGIIHIT A EwmwNw 1297971 RICHT OP THE MMUC TO KUM NW BBARY SLVM FOR CUTE OR FIl" UPON RAID PUNTERS IN WE REAWWJM ORIQIWW BEADING OP STREETS. AVENUES, ALLRWS ARD ROADS AS DRDICAT9D 111 TUR FLAT. 1 @H@rR$q P=RStVRNTO RMM H0EZM A[IIHORM RVMPw Arujm 98056-0316 20031112000985.001 I 1F�[G E2O�i�O1283 �j,� _11�C'-.hl:Nrn ...Ml CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED iil�aaa .,6 Dated Novma=4.m O TM ORAMR 6 ROMAELRODOMANDM&MAA RODGMIRIMANAANOWWR I Ifor and is oomdmabcm d TEN DOlJAM AND O7iQ OOM AND VALUAMZCOMMI]RATION m head Fetd, coagv�a aad Wura>tts to mErdmONm0T1SINOAIlCimuff, A EMMA CO8P0a noN Iba f000WM 4UWW real MM S=Md as da of ENO 8t"c1 R muco av '!w&wMMmba(r) THE SOUTH HALF OF TM WEST HALF OF THE MORTan" QUARTER OF THE. DIORYMB8T QWM= OF THS MTHWSST QOARTBR OF SECTICO. 9, TOM18HIP 73 ROM, RANG$ 6 MET, MAAMM MIDIAW, IN KING COUNTY, WASKIWO W WW8PT TIM SOUTH 76 FEST THEREOF, SICCEPT THH VEST 30 FRET THEREOF FOR RCHOWDS AVENUE NORTHEAST. BOSJ= TO UMPTIONS SET FORTH CW ATTACHBD EIHISiT •A• AM BY THIS RSFBRZWCB NOR A PART HEREOF AS IF FMT nOMPORATBD HEREIN. C .' lb 0 20031112000M.002 STATE OF MRSHINOTON BB COWPJY OF KIM ON THIS ` GAY OF NOVEMBER, 2003, BEFORE HB, THE UNDBRSIO=, A NOTARY POETIC IN AND FOR THE STATS OF WHINGM, GUTTY COMMIBSIONRD AND SHORN, PBRBONALLY APPEARED S. NICHARL, ROWERS AND HARM A. RODOBRB OWN TO M TO 88 THE INDIVIDUAL(S) DESCRIBED IN ANG NHA WMCUM THS WITHIN IMMtMEM AND ACKRONLEGOBD THAT THEY BIG= ANG BSAL6D THE SANE AS THEIR FRES AND VMMARY ACT AND DEED, POR THB OSBS AND PORPOSES HBRBIH MMMOM. r � T'kp��til ���,�,��aibili"•;ft' �� LORA �•`T1y0TMy �� PRnrM NAME P NMUY WSLIC POR THE STATE OP HASH RSBIDING AT` , F 1It,V'�L:��+�..•. NY COMIiSSIOET WIRES ON r 20M111200088SA03 alICA00T1 IE DCURANCB COMPANY BXFRBiT A &cowNo 1115804 RES wATIOEiB ARD BXCBPTIOMS OONTAIHED im DBSD FROM NORTHERN PAOIFIC RAILROAD COMPARY RE80MEO AND EXC13MNO FROM SAID LARDS 80 MOCK OR SUCH PORTIONS WERBOF AS ARE OR MAT 88 MINERAL LANDS OR CONTAIR COAL OR MM, AND Mao Tn USE ARD 'CHB RIOW ARD TITL8 TO TIM USE OF SUCH SURFACE OROORD AS MAY $E 0ECES9ARY FOR OROUM OPERATIONS AND THE RIMU OF ACCESS TO SUCH RBSMMSD AND EYCEPTED HIMPRAL LANDS, INCLUDING LANDS CONTAINING COAL OR IRON, FOR THE PURPOSE OF SEpLORING. DEVELOPING AND HGRKM THE SAME RM=DTNG NUMBER 342731 RRS MENT AHD THS TERMS AND COMDITIOMS THEREOF GRAVMI CITY OF ABNTON PURPOSR• SLOPES, SIDON= AND ROMMRY AREA AFFECTED NEST S,FSET RSI JULY 6, 1977 RSCA UG UMBER • 7707050463 • _ •'k � t.V::. 'Yt.�.. fie' �...+: r':� ,'.1. � J°t7 _ .. THE GRANTORS, LAWRENCE 0. ERNEST. and CLSIE'M.' CRNEST, his wife, for and in consideration of payment of Two Hundred'Fifty,Dollare ($250.00), and other good and valuable'coneideration as hereinafter stated, hereby grant and convey unto THE CITY OF RENTON, A municipal corporation of the State of Washington, certain PrVorty tights in real estate situated in the County of•.King,.8tateWashington, Ln as follows: (1) A permanent easement for the purpose of constructing, repairing and maintaining roadway'slopes;and sidewalk areas, including a rockery, in and upon the Hest Five"(5) feet of the following. described -parcel "W, to!00it: The Southwest 14of "•the- Northw*st .1/4 -of 'the - Northwest 1/4- of the Notithwast .1/4 of flection -0 `-,. ' • Township 22 North,•'Range ' 6 . East', Ve Mo , except ;. • •.' . the South 75 feet.+tnereot.: and: except aha West 30 feet for County road: (2) A temporary construction' easement for, the purpoii 'dt' F... Installing a rookery within the aforedescribed'permanent easement area, in and_upon the Easterly ftsfity five (26) feet of the Hest Thirty (30) feet ofthe foredescribed parcel "A"• .. . (2) A temporary construction aasemenf'for the purpose of placing a driveway on Grantors' property do and upon the West Seventy (70) feet of the South Farty (40), feet of the North One Hundred (100) feet of the afore- 4 described parcel "A".. ` and the conveyance herein of the afor*deaoribed.prepirty rights is made In partial consideration of and upon the following terms and conditionsi (A) The City as Grants* shall,riplade the existing driveway on Grantors '.prop'srty.with -a.shown in red on the sketch &Ad, prof ill attached UNO marked 4xhibit "A" 'and thereby"nada a part•h reo Sueh new driveway, shall cowkncs- at r he- V*stery . e tto of • the p"I%srry with a curb oytt twinty M .f**t In width, shall extend batik of "a lot rids in a .aast*rl direction at a width of -Waive 12) ftiat.,"all as OK own :e'• .'. t•.•+ i'�C" w�'St K. .3 ;R i:'. a• 5 : '�' q:a •:« •Pl a� N ^",. 'y ` Y . S. '* ... i •. V"'•moi �,•. '?r� ;i.��y, ` . �?•�ti.!<•,.; fr•.. ,�.a ''r%^ li•� •E•:'�,M��� f:i.„. .�.•r.::.\',..• .. .s �',,, '� •:i;;. ..!•» Vii, 1�..!', ,. ,^�!:y"'r!'r✓'�~ - .� 'LV �•,7.•�. ., ' •Y. .til �� 1•� sttached Exhibit "A"t and -it shall ba asphalted to i distance required.to meet the exieting grade of Grantors' property. (8) The new driveway shall be out in and -made usable by ,acing of ggravel thereon prior to cutting cff the existing drivawayt and it is understood that the Granterq shall have reasonable access to -and from their property during construction. (C) The temporary construction easement -for $he purpose o: lacing a driveway on Grantors' preperty.shall be extinguished at st.ch time as said driveway, including asphalt surfacing, is completed.,. (D) The City as Grantee intends to make -use of the temporary eonstruetion,a usment adjacent to the permanent easement only to the extent that it bacomes necessary to enter.thereon;to effect proper construction of the roe _y within the permanent easement area: Should the City make use' of such temporxiy construction easement area, there is:hereby reserved to Grantors . a claim against the•City for damages, if+any, sustained by the Grantors' property by reason -of a eh'use, - The temporary construction easetaent:shal be extinguished at such time as construction has`bien completed and the same is accepted by. the City.:'''- • -- DATED thisA; day of � ' ,1972.''. wren " L. rues ' r 7•L STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ? On this day personally appeared before ms LAWRENCE J. ERNEST aad ELSIE K. ERHEST, to me known to be the indi4iduals described in and who executed the within eA4r foregolag instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the saq* at, their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purpoies therein mentioned. ' 04~nder ray hand and official seal this qday of h, 1972. fifte to .14na for M-61—are of Washington, residing at Renton. 0 m •• 6l 0• i 12'Ot r gm 5 '=+ KING OCt�Y. ��'_'�t •'' . f�, ' :' n • ~!4 rA for Record «t Request ui . -' Wks • .! , • w., 'N.rr Jr iry .. . ...':r,-vf r}•IA/^"p►F •• 6l 0• i 12'Ot r gm 5 '=+ KING OCt�Y. ��'_'�t •'' . f�, ' :' n • ~!4 rA for Record «t Request ui . • N4 N 1 I F . r I ' f• i r O r N �.a +..r....� `. .+-.rr r.. �.. �►s i !+..�.� tOMJ - AV R r.: ' '-4:.:. < ....i!'�'?'x'';:134` �. ��ys,:,:: ,,{.:�:.•. • ; • .: ,. �� 1,�:� - _ +n'+ksiSvti �F�i6ussur ' � '^' �. .• A ■ 1� 0 L CL .. II�J■ tib I' X31 Y .A•.t- rte. rr:• zz .• �! !� �•r '., f f 'F: �," ••y . � ���! ! Z M f r z r 7 • s s it • M i �,, � a � � + t s t t i 1 � r 1 �,.� ..� � � ''Y; ext• • •� t h. _ Vii.:.l till, s�s"3 s1ss. D,yOL ds— :i ! zi ow Far ol. 1 , •y • If s �. vqb r � - ax. y � s = r. Y '• ,;s, '.'sem: f�� i y � � •s' 'st' V S f ( 40 saw 6, IY y � ` J � yya ��� S• L k ,t l • �' � �t . r =lin � lop Y ti �• S•. � y �S• cm t r • •,•+ t w > r = 04 � } ,t ,• . - � 1. Y f �� � i i 1 0� .tt tt "' • 1 , ♦ yti s t5 �jr 1 y �� k ♦ 1 F t'•y - �•y. ys 7 .y 1•, tsi. 'tyN•� � •r'� r4�: is s " 1 °`t iV �r j si '• - 1 byte �1 '� �- -�:' �` �_ Pew Ac f el 1 y ! 11 Ar V ,6_ jr ltittytiitxl,} � " t% puttAr i •iyt t ,tyyyY ,tot � � � I M e� , " k r S Stt ''<t �� • � [[ 7 { L'• •�ry'hi:y�^s y{ - ,•�Azyy 'ktyty •� �� icy 'S r ''.. +S• r � � k• �•Z. til. ''t4. T , + i = Z Y y rY 4 s /f l it V 'a k 'tt. "ks.1 S � . • t i t f ifh 1� •YI— vol ' L.• 1 ` Sit • ion f 1►0 ` T r M 0".30 •.r T y M 4 fa 71 11 � 1 �' ice- • s} ' !.•,py � •y+s� • w 4 •�,.�� sti;;:::ss,y� :;tit it y `` •t. , 1 atttxtttts%.%, 4ty: L .ri 1 .t• �� r ty� f _'SLS 'sL: t,;t51'SY Z .q ! f 'Y' ajk�j�p ' � ,'�o ass•} }t ► ' fid. >'; i�`�,'� � � i � � • •s' t 1 'r• .. � s s i r ,1 It r;f � i � }°'� + .� � `r`�� •N',� Mkt "4 -i %N '4tR . If it Jlr y �►• I 91 �• •' • ` ;• ? tl � I PA '. 1,ti ltt• . � r y i .tib• ��su R�' .r 11yy • '' ti. ._ 4 ' 5 t; r t a. low s or � r 4 ! M .1+::..:Y. S� f Ii + i• IL t tias` +e fal �•}l ',l s• s R 111 f9 '�; at sss � (t,�r 1 i • � � . ;ss `s � .. r J*{* � S I I • It `w "S. LSS`�' if n� , � f �f. \\ N •. • �' S ! ' R(SY- ;,r'•�,r • .� fT ` � •,•�it I. qp 'Nt6 P. brim Ilk t ` ,,pati -y iii: r. • ' � ���:�, t • �T•+ A iH.J yi ,SQL• .y ':' 10 ,1 Ifj if.� ���• S i •1 1►.. �, yid;, It�lry 1 s ff 71� � � •4�S ti � _ 1 ' .,g E StN ti V4 �+ ate``' :. � ��� • � » � � � � � 'N, r• ' �., . • s 4•„ R �Wal ax ".So C 1• _ —_ - it ,� �.. i 't •.,d JM L 3 `r y,� f 1 1 \a y i i • 4T L r vi 46 I / w 41 . a /jjr !+ r•a/ S � �' G is 7 �, ..,k.'�r O I a 4 — 1 at'' f 5,i �lT , +i. , tt, � t •,' •. � � Y I � yts::s:�,t •tom z#F h., ��d `� •'ht'� ri R .FI �•'•��•� �P .lt� � p.st 'S t •t i s t � � � s +4 � �° � a It ► ' C 1 I 1 •s' 'iy^M,. tl16PI 4+ksai • r�1L:. t�i� 1 •hss,lt •t `•,,; •7 , • — fir 'do woo y ` 1 � �It is •� !�� �I 55 ' � �4:� w I' • � �1 M i til krk 1 11 k s It L vx 7C - � •f c Ic epi k �h• j I /1� � ttt. ,r•� I w• p � ! a I $r:s . ., •ssM iq, hyO 1 �i�; r r t rr I h: It 'tl l t ' £ � i S 'ttlh Z7 h:4 tl 'kt. �• t t N � � Aev oil# M pqr fit r;s ��S��s� •,t'�iL Mau any •, 1:;�� !f .I J I a �1 tj O�� Ogg i N �ZZ O� V) fA SS 0 ^^ r k 1� W LLC 0 W LL 0 0 a .a I i a ten a ruAv 6WorKm t CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 City Of Renton Planning Division Printed: 06-30-2011 Land Use Actions JUN 3 0-2011 RECEIPT R Permit#: LUAII-054 Payment Made: 06/30/201101:47 PM Receipt Number: R1102514 Total Payment: 1,030.00 Payee: JOEL C. ING Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount ------------------------ ------------------------------- ---------------- 3080 503.000000.004.322 Technology Fee 30.00 5020 000.000000.007.345 Site Plan Approval 1,000.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Credit C AMEX 3001 1,030.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description 3021 303.000000.020.345 Park Mitigation Fee 3080 503.000000.004.322 Technology Fee 3954 650.000000.000.237 Special Deposits 5006 000.000000.007.345 Annexation Fees 5007 000.000000.011.345 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.000000.007.345 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.000000.007.345 Environmental Review 5011 000.000000.007.345 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.000000.007.345 Final Plat 5013 000.000000.007.345 PUD 5014 000.000000.007.345 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.000000.007.345 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.000000.007.345 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.000000.007.345 Rezone 5018 000.000000.007.345 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.000000.007.345 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.000000.007.345 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.000000.007.345 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 5022 000.000000.007.345 Variance Fees 5024 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.000000.007.345 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.000000.002.341 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.000000.007.341 Maps (Taxable) 5998 000.000000.000.231 Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 Balance Due --------------- .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00