HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 01John & Ada Sheen
320 Chelan Place NE #H2
Renton, WA 98059
tel: (425) 988-3371
(party of record)
c/o Hugh Stewart
Eastside Funding LLC
PARTIES OF RECORD
QFC Fuel Center #871
LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A
Robert McNeil!
Senior Planner
Barghausen Consulting
Engineers, Inc.
18215 72nd Avenue S
Kent, WA 98032
tel: ( 425) 656-1061
eml: bmcneill@barghausen.com
(contact)
Tim Hansen
QFC Real Estate Manager
Quality Food Centers, Inc.
10116 NE 8th Street
Bellevue, WA 98004
tel: (425) 462-2163
(applicant)
3933 Lake Washington Blvd NE
ste: #100
Kirkland, WA 98033
tel: ( 425) 803-9456
(owner)
Updated: 11/13/12 (Page 1 of 1)
. '
For
THE KROGER CO.
3800 S.E. 22ND AVEN U E
PO RTLAND , OREGON
Tit!9 ;
COLORED SI TE PLA N
QFC FUEL
SWC DUVA LL AVE. & N.E . 4TH ST
RENTON, WAS H INGTON
,, .
For:
T HE K ROGER CO.
3800 S .E. 22 ND AVENUE
PORTLA ND, OREGON
"""''·'
.:: .,
I. I. , _--+-------------l
Titre:
N E IG HBORHOOD DETA IL MAP
QFC FUEL
SWC DU VALL AVE. & N.E. 4TH ST
RENTO N, WASHINGTON
,~-. EVISIONS
I
I
' I
-~---
1
---1
I
0
< r
C) m z m
::0
)> r
z
~
CJ)
, ___
.,.. .... *' J " 0u1 ;:D rot-u-, ::J '< :f'J: rn -u ::J 0 ::J lnrt "" TI ....
en JJ = -0 ~ = $ (1)
"" :I LJinl "' 0 ..+
0 g :::J :I
I' np H I~~, I ' )> ' ~ ~
!!,? I ~ • :... !l ' ' I :1 : ~ m ~, a ~ ~ 11
'
'
' ' ~
.... J..'. ... ,
-!_
/} ~,, \ ' '
~-----
a.-_ ------· --·
--.-----/--cc·c-:_= I•
I
REVISIONS
~ ~
' i
I
1111111
I I I
-
L
!
' '
i-
i -~l ·~,
I
I
I
I
,·
('I
~
o -,,,J,
' ~~
'
)>
:::n
0
I
rrl
~
C :::n
)> r
(/)
-I m
-u
~ z
~ ,nri·.,
.., •-j/_1
[Q!
~ :rJ
--(D
if) :J g -0 :::;;
1~t~1~~· P.EViS".J\JS ~ ~ ' '" ! ! i !b=i:~C'C====:=::=':::'':::µ[J'::!'J='"== ~ ~~>--+----------+--+--t---
l>---+-----------t--+--+---<
:i~ J>--+---------+---+--+--<
sn;,.,i C••) -,,-,/!,~•,:•,;_,, I "'" S,.,.', .• • I "'·''°'' ,,,1 ••••
~ r
0 -I ,,
~ "' m
00 ...... ---1 --1 -:,. -<0 z-,, ~ o~o
Tl .?1 JJ 0
JJ -I::::! m 0 o en ~ :ez s: ozo z .,,,
-I :,.; =u -I r -I ~ z~m
'""z z ozm
0 o......-0 c::•o ~ ~Tl -I -<.
-JJ~ ,; ,. m -I ,. z
'"" z r Im,; m ~OI~
--1mO en 0,.,,
z '" C .--1
" :D
"' < m -<
() I~ I .i:,.
g_
<O ~ '
-,
'
--------'/ __ _
ii ,I
' I;.
'
'
PPP i ~ .;;. if . if -
' j I
:~~~,1d
' '
. ·-
--I
I
' I :,~1 I'
I I I h 1! .: .. 1
i
~ 6 ! I ' • !
"! ! !i n !
l
~
'
, : 11
::JRE IONS
I
f I
L -
I
I
,I
j;
I
,I
i i 11111 i i
II l l ' ' l •• ' I !
!! ' I! ! I ' ' ' ' ' !
·~ .. •
5 ' ' I ' l
l
11
j j
C)
~
0 z
C)
"'U r
)> z
! ! i !ii 1 ! ! ~ 0
! I ' !I ! ,l
~ ~
~~
() I .i 0) i~ 9. t~! (0
'
' ., '
'
'
'
' ' '
' ' ~~;--\,
-.... ~ ·cc· . --------F. I_;-: ~ ~·,; ,!·
____ ~;'~.~2:~~'.h'.~ __ ... ~-~~-.=.~~:~4~: .. ,;,'..:~;,,·,--,_-
:: ~' ··_•. _,I __ 'D~VALL~~~-J, ''/t; i'1t!i! ~~~: ~~"'--:'~ ,~~~L~' ~~~-5/'.~~~~~--~~-1*~;7JjE 1
-
• « 1: ,!
' I : ;: , , I '1\·
1
'1~r
I i. ·,\
I •• • ~ 'I
.:...-;-i
,:::;'.~.
,,-._r,,
,J ;;
,<;=;,"'. ·._I::;::":.
fiilf
,:.:::__~
,PP!i
-? '<' '<':
t
~ f
i~~dHf
REVISIONS
/i
/I
'
'
. '
', 1 S5 --
,l ~ ;f; ~ "Ii! ! • ! ~ • I !
I
! !
(/)
)> z
~
~
(/)
m
:E m
::IJ
)> z
0
~
::IJ
-u
~ z
1111
i I ~ ~
~~
i
m \
' ni ' "i
! " II HI
" ~
0
'!I >: r ro··. ...
/
. ··1;
(· ,-
"'
m
! ~
£ ~
0
~
LT /---;.z'
1 • / //;~"?
i~i t f i ~~~ ~· ~ i)i 1 . --f
6 lk-f-. '.;
~ ~ ~!"_.;·· ~p
H
t\\ ------1, fi '! I, i; Ii ' a
0 Ji I 1:iqq1 . ··-~ ~ ~ ~::
! g_ t ' ~ a r (0 " : ~ r ; ! ,! ;:; ~ j!! ,;l ~
!
!
l
ii
H
' l
:2~
,7=:..:;-
;.: ..i ~
REVI
I
¥'\
:j ... ,if
il ri'
'< -_-,
·,
!
;!! :.:~ a;!
~;~ ,: , .
l
f
. . . .•
!ii ,, I
% '<l~ .,
' '! -:,~ ~ ';'! ~ q.
', I 'i -~ ~ !! I s
; ii H . C
'· ! ! ' '
r·· i
1!!11 !
!" ' • ! a
lC ,:::;:f,;:.,
".!!.!U ! ' ~
s ' ' '
.
' ' ' ' ' j ' • I
!
!
n11
i
' '
i
i
8 z
~
C
~
0 z
0
~
r
Cl)
0 co
g_
(0
• I
! ;1
I if---J--------t-H--i ;~~ .. ~~i
' I
i
i
!
' ' ' ' '
•j'PI i 'I 1 1, ,. , I •l u , i i ~ : ~ L ....
I
i
111
0
0 z
~
C
~
0 z
:t> z
0
rr1
(/)
0
0
~
~
. J.-
•.. i, .,
' j I
1'I ·"" 1:1 ,i
'·
lbcf--
: . « I
,_9·oc,u,rq< .· 0 I -==---1.---1--"'-=~----;; .. /
i i
'
'·
,,<].
:To: :1 I! ~
" !1 a u111: Li ,; ' ! § -· ·"?~", er, -n, '<:' \) i:::. ·"' 0 ,r,;::;, "° :J Li u L' ......
REVISIONS
c:::::=:i PI H!{t ~ ~ 0 ' ' . ~ -~ ~ f -!' ~ ~: li1nJ CD'. ' ~1 ' g_ ~ (0 I i
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I
:2,Q.
u1r11 V, =, rn ~o.· ~-m "" a, =-=,
c:,s:; ~ ::::
u-ITTJ
lg
; ~
!': ~~ 0 §
~~
~m
~j
~~
z~
, ___ c-~.~-~~~~-
' '
' ' '
_'l
-" ff;.
)'.
-•·-h ).
,· l;
"' .F; ..............,....0
i:_t
,•) ·< .-, "
,.
I
I
I
~ . I
ul=-· L ..
;Y
.(/
·:;t·
'
---.',,..~----=i'i'='?_~-. ~
. ·~~j r ·=·==='~cc"cT:.,,~i'j~-:~~~z·j·:l,_
L
r 1·
-: I :J~: 11 ___ _:J :
-------------··-~--~~----·~· ti 1~
,") I ; -,, .
;;~'.
pF,", u L: ~
.'H ~ c:,
(Ju
.::..:.... .. ::J
~
[(U1)
g
•"' ... 0 \, J
. J ,.....
.:J '<
~-0 -· ;:; :u
< (')
~') ".;J
G
,..,.
·" 0
:;i
' ::::j,;J "·--tY·-
-·<-~ 1· I ----,-~
,, . '1
y
I , -I-
.. J_
: ~~--
u-,
rn
"· ..,
a,
~ = ""
~ .
..
>---'r·'·' -----=1---,w
u ()
~ ~
:, '<'.
::J 0 .::i ...... TJ
JJ CJ () <
~-'.'J . ..,.
C 0 CJ ::;
·!..:.'
-,:-BiL •
:1-1==---
>---'-..---------
_·_._,:..:_; ------
1
I
"
,--____ _ l-~·
l
,,,,.., -
.'.' . ' I
\ _,.·'-.1·· •
'I
I
,,..: .. :·'
J:_.·· .
f ·-
,. IJ
-·----]-.
'~: 1 ' '1 1 •
I
__ ...
,.-,
jj.
-'+-l
1,,
--'--t __ · _·
I~
. 'I
-i l
--+
... '
-' J
L
111 11
J_ .
_r + ----~',----------
I ! __ /. ·1· -~c--r:if~I ·.
' '
-I
-1----·1
V
I ·-t 1,
I
1 TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN ,, .. _,.
·' , !'T·:· 1 -11 11 '
i ,ilji ! ii 1! 11 ! i
I' , I 11 Ii !111
I'.,
~ I i1il:
-t
1 ·1
I ·i
I I
1 · 1
I 'I
l-1
L>i
c, I
I
-i
''
~i:. '.
I.
" ·r
I
[;$,'·(1
I i
i, I
I' i
' .,.
, ZA. ~f.D_L~~~ HASP OEJ:AIL
2 TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATION
'1
I
TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAILS
L, ,,,,, .. , -.
' ~ I I
! I I ' I
I I I _[ i ;1 r
_, 1-
L I_
_I =I;-
l
,-1 J_
I I I -1 '
'·*-1
I
' ' I
I
' ·~ i_ I
,
1,;~r
3 TRASH ~NCLOSURE ELEVATION
, ·1
-11 >.t ISltM :1,a'
~r
:w
,:Ill l
,,]ii .. '· . --' '".".' .. L _, . Ll-= ,•:
:: .: 1:Fff$(~drJi1~11~fli ~ ··,-cc;· ."-·-~(jsr,0
·
jrl -/'.:'.'':;;,, l• ;J' ,, '
4 TRASH ENCLOSURE SECTION
City of Rerto,1
')lnnnir1q Divisior,
SEP. 2 6 2012
:;:i! 1~· (('' ·1:-.:: 11 l~f,i w:: f[J--i'I · t\_-. __ ,'.::~ "-:~,'.. ·u ,"-:..1lb:V
,, " .. , -·
I 1 , .. ,,_; fj7 1-r ·1
1
,,
--::---iJ 1 I t'--1 .. . --1-· r" --·-. I
. I I -~ . _, j
.", i ·:-+· .'::{ ,;. -'--, ,· ,_
,;,
5 , ~-~~-~.D~~l~N DETAIL
., ·-,~
I.·. -~-·'.i~--~ ·. :. , .. t
' .. ·11 ·· ... .· .. ·1 ' '. •
'----:-----'---·!1----:'--,--'·-r'-
I 1 1rr 1
i 1'. ·, .; .
i ?, . . }j
I
.. ' ' . . ' .. ; J '"7! :--,,· .. ,
. ·.-• I :,i I I i
i. j : i. [
,
6 ~~p DETAIL
,_.~<'-c;,HA<.,,S'«'
~. ' 1-
0 -
\ !
~, +"" ,~~ .. ~,~ ....
~ ~· >: I ~ ;'·H ~, r:. ! ~;,,
~ ':I c'· C &J,,, • ~ I]/'"·,, ~ r_: .. -~-~\ .. ~ ;, ·-1,.,~: ~ 1\_«.1~ll ~ '-t,f$/
,.
"
t::"ij1\
\i.;05i::3:!
"-I i I · ; I I
n.1 r ·
·ri ~ :-i
I
1 i I I 1 -·· ' "----;---·-__j-
= FUEl.J>Kl FACIUT'(
SD-1
15432
EX-2
... __ -=n---
_-,
D
()
.:+,"
'<
0 -+.
:0
(~ :;
''"
•
·""" <,J>
0
'Tl
()
F~.
THE KROGER CO.
3800 S.E. 22ND AVENUE
PORTLAND, OREGON
Title
0
0
'Tl
()
CANOPY ELEVATIONS
QFC FUEL
SWC DUVALL AVE. & N.E. 4TH ST
RENTON, WASHINGTON
.JO
TJ'
fJ V) n-,
--0 ifiri t,:,
C C ~ t~
~ ..._,
' s m g 15432
EX-4
u () -· ,.....
_, '< ::;
0
D -+,
9 ·o
~ 18215 72 N OAVENUE SOUTH
KENT, WA 98032
~ .-r;j
(425) 251-6222
(425) 251-8762 .• .. C'Vll [.N~ NCCR NG. VJ,.0 r"\..ANNING,
<,;. ................ SUAVEYIHG. [JN~l,l(NT.t,,l. SCRVUS
' ' Q ',,
" ' '
_...._ -_.,,_
---"IL..
' ' ' q ',,
" ' ' ' ' ' . q ',
~~/~//////>
For:
THE KROGER CO.
3800 S.E. 22ND AVENUE
PORTLAND, OREGON
Tit/8:
COLORED LANDSCAPE PLAN
QFC FU EL
SWC DUVALL AVE . & N.E . 4TH ST
RE NTO N, WASH INGTON
-----------------------------------~~---· ··-··-·--------------.
I
,0 ~ 1~ ..
!'
:5' ~ " ...
n n a i
~
q
I I ; ~ ~ I I ; ! ~ ~ I fl I " ffl I ! ~ ·I " ffl . ~ ~ f~ . ' 2 fi i• ! ~ i ., .,
' !~
~g ~ ~ 'I '!1 ' " ~ ·, . ' ' j:
H ~ • . '" ' ' " " I:'=~~
p
u § ;§§ ~~
~ ~
i "U
"' 2 ' m ! ~ ! ~
' .. ' ~d '
eHii~ ~-!~~
'.'L/9 ~-, ~?ji re
82~
:D8;0g m~;ii
~Ul ,.
0 oz""TI5 zmcz "Tl -.;:,.,m ..
0 ::E~C
92 )> z
OO~Cl 0 ;i; "Tl .., Zml> (1) ~'!lQ z O r
9 z ~
"' )> 0 ex,
0 0 0
0, ~ 0
:::i! ~
1-
z ? ff:S~ ~
( ,,;,;a
!m ,~1>~ ~!!i : ,:
\ ~ .. .. ,.~~ . ti,<::
~~, "'"<:. "'~
~..,,;;,;; , .. ,, .-.,.
! ~)j~;;
"":(~ .,,, q,'IS
i
iili
1,-,,...,
IJ ~I /
iij!! z ~ ;;2ii ; ~i~~ g~;~ ~ ,, i " ~tz jl! Si ;~ 0 i! I
~
"' ,.
r
i z
@
;::: z ~ 0
' m X ' !i1
0
i z
@
L
?.
Quality Food Centers
A Division of The Kroger Company
!
-~
I
ALT A / ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY
A PORTION OF THE NEY.i OF THE NWY4 OF
OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.
CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
]p _ ., ·---~~"'-.i!c~~~~~···'""'-=,c,C,m-C," -;., c --"" " --""'-• -'£,;;ii,-~-.; 1 ::~e>--
Q -:-1~~---.;;i"';:_ --. ~ .. ;--:: .. =~-,. _\\;,~ 'l-''-'"-i-{·-e-----
1 -_.....__..=--,;:,;; \.~""'" '"' ,,,.,...,,~.,, •• ' .~ 11 ,r 11 ' _,.. ---••• ..... -· .,, ,.,!)J,1~~iUu1:,ljx,,,; -,_ • ~r: --T ~:_;~:i ~:,r.;, + \Ja~[ \" O 'w--n
, ,,..» •• ,, """ • ,.,,,,, ,,... ,~, "i':,hin .,.. • , '/ -7'~~,,-"'-"'•-•oo;o \~ In: <+1-¥1~
/ I I ,· ' .... 4-I •-',;•µ, '~"",, ....... "", c~ 1. "'1, "'"'"" I' '' ·• • I (
'"'""' [',~~> ·'°'"'"' -~·!;,,r,r"'··h:_r·'', ·.!,I~ ;1'.~-
1;'-· .. ••••• ····:.,;,;• -. \ \. I/! I,,
/ -! .. w •• "'" ... ;· ·.' ,-1, . ..1 ... 1
: . i ' [I·-·, ·"'1 ·1 · , '"''""""·"" II.: .•·a ••• ''··1·1~-" ~. "'""'
I
'a ' . " > I;., ~ / "'~' ""' ·:1 :, ).1 (•.;; m.""' !: :•~;·, ,,.on~, "'"""'~ ,;_,-·/.~/ • .9: \ i::' .,;/
'."J
C>l
[._,-1
-LEGEND
• +:
',., ,_ , .. ; '· '1,11 I '··: ,1::,,:·-----·-i i., i;. ~ . "· ,
•I:,!, • ''CJ''C"\ '•.•· 'ii -r, :---,,-
1 • • ...,,·,, \ -' 1--.,,.,... ,'" '"'·""·· '"''"'"'"''" I i,= -~·"""' J .; ::~· ,·• .. r / 11··1' ,J\ __ c•:•·_•" "yti:~ ,.. ,~--'"-·"'·"~"
l'/1= -' .,,,,.~., '\ '. ' .,, .
[_ -· =-·· 1·-------, "''" ,,. : ,.:: ---[ --~ c"·1--~1ififf•f-j"' ·t' ,"II~~
"''"'' •rn;;\ ,.,,._. "''"'"""' .. f -~,t·s::""'."'''"--(• ... '1-I ,._':J.i"i' '~'""''"'" uo" \'s '1;_ ;Q I 'C<,<t<:>< ~ ·.,,>P<c'>=" I"< I,...' ~-j"'\-<cll' ,--~'--?-~ .. ;: .. _... ----: .. · .. "· _,,,;;·~:,,t "'~·:1' ·,1 ·1: I 1· ~--~:.r, ....
... , .... (")
i-· ---.-c1:::--I'S=:.·~-·-.,--· -,--,---;[::1.;;;a:.:v ,~left\,· . , .. :.: :r,e:e::,; I FT ] I 1 .. 1·.-n-:1.. 11 1 · J.. r···,rc-.. ,;., I ',""ii: ' l;-1 ·. k'""'
' ' , ' I ' ""•,;• ;);: 'cc· ""Tl ' 'I . •,·· I I !-•· •.• •• I ::.=-"'""'''"''-',.)l,,. ~ljr·IO!:I !, '1' -.~ .. ~ J~L: ,;:,· .~· ·-~~~_,,}:'''"":·~;::'!':-!~:} t
C, f~~=;;;·j ;~-_: ::: ... , ....
"'"--
i i#=-i-:-:.":":=-=-·~ --' * ::;:;:;:-
, , . .;::;;:" r-,c,. .. r ... 11 i:;~J:l• i... .~i.. .-.,---Mc~~
........ > I
·;:~:°:: f::\) I j
'""-~------=--::::._'-:-~-~, -~. ,~ :-""
--~· ... ,-. .,......,-i:-"'~n.,..,..., ..... )n/ '·"" , 1c· .. .u,..:i! 1
ii.-"fii!li11c;
SEP. 2 6 1011
·u< 1c. 1.,." .. '' le:::· JJ n //IL= rr,,
r-·1_. :~--;:~ _t'-::"":':t, \\_1 r:--:, ;; 1·
./
cc z
D
U)
~
~
GHA<.,\S>
-.."~.;. 4>, ,: .....
;· ,:_ ~ii
'< .... ~, .. ,,,,.~-.,,
:~!;'. .;~~~~-c SO.IH
"l'l.l!•-,m ;::~::~:L~,,
Of I
•
8'!
.
, .is.~~
!~j~
,.,,~, ,_ ,,.,, ~-··-" """""_.Ef
c,,--,~.,.
-""'" ~,=
°""'"'""
2 of 2
() I 01 I~ I s.
<D g ~ .. ,, ~ '" ,!
REVISIONS
' ; ' ~~~~~~,
• I
[ 1
a
:::0 s::
0
~
z
)>
C)
m
"'U r
)> z
I
I
' : [ill
' f I
: ·1
___ =-::,..,_ .. ---. -_ · .. ---~-! ·\1
;;I__ ii ~
·I
i• 1·
! !
I !
l!i!t::e:.~~~;::=====R=E=VIS=IO=N=S::J:'~:'.[::~-,::j
~ ~ ~L--'--~~~~~~-'--'-_J_____J
: ii
I [[
: II
I [[
OJ
I~ I I\) ..
~ l ~ il • <O p ,i
'
'
'
' :i
j
I
' ~-!>--+-~~~ .... ~~~~-+--+--+-~~
l~~\~ef>--+-~~~~~~~>-->-->-------<
I
. i
I
I
I
0 m
~
0 r
-;
0 z
l> z
0
:-I m
Cl)
0
""U r
l> z
~
o -, \
0 / \ ~ j \ ~~ ·,,,-I
/_
'
_(2 .. ,
~~
::J -u-, :c '< "' :CJ 0 :-a
"" -+. _:::, a,
:d. JJ ~ ni = < "" r;· :,
6 ,.;-
0
:J
REVISIONS
DlNALL AVE tE
-I
:!: ill om
;u ::09 ;,;; m,
"' -I. :c m I mz m-1
-15 z
"'
4,--
* 0
I j
' ' I I
' ! i
\ i~ l J ' ' X E
i i I i Ii ' ! ! ! ; ! ! ! !
' ! • l ' !
' ' ' ' I l i • l
' ' I ' !. 9 • i ! i I I
!
'------,
'
' ' I I --i -----c--------:--~---
I
. I
I
,~!.:----
I
--::. --------::.
* *
" Qo
DUVALL AVE NE
-----/---=--c:c1·----; -
'
'
' I ~ ;~
! ii I
i il l
l I l
i ! ' I I e
! I
! ! ! a
il1;7, , ..
67'7..::-; ~--
'=
----
' !
!
I.
I :
_J -: I , . I
~ z
~
)> -u m
-u r
)>
~ z
C)
-u
~ z
DEPARTMENT OF cor. JNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
MINOR MODIFICATION OF QFC FUEL CENTER #871
[gJ APPROVAL D DENIAL
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
APPLICANT:
ZONING DESIGNATION:
PROJECT LOCATION:
EVALUATION FORM & DECISION
QFC Fuel Center #871
LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A
Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager
Tim Hansen, QFC Real Estate Manager, Quality Food Centers, Inc.,
10116 NE 8th Street, Bellevue, WA 98004
Commercial Arterial (CA)
4615 NE 4th Street
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting five modifications to the approved site
plan. These modifications are requested due to additional site constraints and information
identified through the construction permit and building permit process. The modifications
address the removal of a specific condition of approval for vertical landscape screening, refuse
and recycling standards, driveways widths, fa~ade lighting requirements, and service elements
screening.
The requested modifications are summarized below:
1. Site Plan modification from LUA 12-083 to remove condition of approval 113 which states "The
applicant shall be required to submit a final landscape plan, including details for vertical
elements, for review and approval by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building
permit issuance."
2. Refuse and recycling standards modification from RMC 4-4-090C.6 and C.9 to reduce the
required gate opening from 12 feet to 11 feet and to eliminate the signage requirements for the
trash enclosure.
3. Driveway width modification from RMC 4-4-080J.3.c to exceed the maximum driveway width of
30 feet up to 36 feet wide.
4. Design Guideline modification from fa~ade lightning requirements in RMC 4-3-lOOE.7, to
eliminate the requirements for fa~ade lighting.
5. Design Guideline modification from service element screening requirements in RMC 4-3-lOOE.1,
to eliminate the requirements for screening for the temporary generator.
City of Renton Department of Comr
QFC Fuel Center #871
Report of April 8, 2014
Project Description:
, and Economic Development Administrative icotion Request Report & Decision
LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A
Page 2 of 5
The QFC fuel station received Site Plan review approval on November 21, 2012, with 12
conditions of approval. Following land use permits, the applicant applied for construction
permits to build the site infrastructure. During construction permit review it was realized that
Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) were required for water quality at the project
site. This requirement resulted in the addition of rain gardens to the overall development. The
rain gardens have been combined with the required landscaping along the site frontage and
behind the public plaza. As a result of the BMP requirements, the original landscaping plan was
amended to include rain gardens and landscaping. This amendment removed the vertical
screening elements from the overall plan. As such, the applicant has requested that condition
#3 be removed from the Site Plan approval as it requires details of vertical elements that are no
longer included in the landscape design. The modification to the site plan to add the rain
gardens and amend the landscaping plan (resulting in the removal of condition of approval #3)
would not increase the area or scale of development or change the boundaries of the approved
plan. Furthermore, the modification provides for water quality treatment at the site and would
not result in a greater impact on the environment and/or public facilities. In fact in would
reduce the impact on the environment and public facilities.
The applicant has requested the reduction of the 12-foot gate opening for the refuse and
recycling and the removal of the required signage. The applicant contends that the refuse and
recycling facilities at the subject site would have no public access; access would only be
provided to the station attendant and Waste Management for pick-up. The 11-foot wide gate
is necessary to allow sufficient space on-site for vehicular circulation and would be the
minimum adjustment necessary to provide for efficient Waste Management pick-up. Given the
lack of public access to the trash enclosure, signage is not necessary. Overall the two
adjustments would meet the objectives of safety, function, and appearance intended by the
code requirements. These adjustments are not expected to be injurious to other property
owners in the vicinity and would conform to the intent and purpose of the code. The applicant
has indicated that the pick-up process would include manually rolling the dumpsters out for
truck pick-up, thus reducing the need for the 12-foot wide gate. Overall, these two
modifications requested are justified and required for the intended fuel station use and the
situation at the subject site.
The applicant's request for modification to the driveway width from 30 feet to 36 feet is
necessitated by the need for fuel delivery at the site. The 36-foot wide driveway cut would
allow for adequate accessibility for larger vehicles accessing the fuel center. Furthermore, the
applicant has indicated that the driveway width would also allow for improved access for the
City of Renton Department of Cornn
QFC Fuel Center #871
Report of April 8, 2014
and Economic Development Administrative! ication Request Report & Decision
LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A
Page 3 of 5
larger vehicles and delivery trucks and at the same time allow for the site to maintain adequate
maneuverability on-site for customers. The requested modification is anticipated to
substantially implement the policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and is the
minimum necessary to accommodate the fuel trucks. The wider driveway would meet the
objectives of safety, function, appearance intend by the code and is based on sound
engineering judgment. The 36-foot wide driveway would not be injurious to other properties in
the vicinity and would conform to the intent and purpose of the code.
The applicant has requested two modifications from the standards of Design District D, one for
fa~ade lighting, the other for screening of utilities. For projects located in a design district
either the applicant is required to meet the standards of the design district or be compliant
with the Guideline.
The guidelines for lighting require fa~ade lighting to improve pedestrian safety and create visual
interest in the building during evening hours. The applicant has indicated that the subject site
is primarily an automotive use that is setback from the street frontage and screened by the
landscaping along the site frontage. Typically, pedestrian traffic at fuel sites is actively
discouraged throughout the site as the use is auto-oriented. In addition, the fa~ade of the
building is minimal as the only structures are the fuel station canopy and a small kiosk. The
canopy contains site lighting that would allow for pedestrian safety at the site in those
instances that pedestrians would walk through the site. The plaza and landscaping areas
contain bollard lighting that would add visual interest during the evening hours. These lights
are not located on the building but would draw the eye to the landscaping screening and
pedestrian space which would add visual interest during the evening hours.
The guideline for service element location and design identified that service elements shall be
concentrated and located so that impacts to pedestrians and other abutting uses are minimized
and mitigated with landscaping and an enclosure with fencing or other quality materials. The
applicant originally was required to provide a generator in the southwest corner of the site. It
has been approved by the City of Renton Emergency Services Department to allow the
development to provide a portable generator in the event of extended power outages instead
of a permanent on-site generator. The generator would be "parked" at the same location on
the site as was proposed for the permanent generator. However, the generator would only be
"parked" at the site in those instances it was needed for emergency power. As such the
applicant has asked to remove the requirement for screening of the temporary generator.
Given the utility is temporary the screening provided for the refuse and recycling would meet
the guideline and no screening would be required for the temporary generator unit.
City of Renton Department of Comn
QFC Fuel Center #871
Report of April 8, 2014
ANALYSIS OF REQUEST:
and Economic Development Administrative fl. ·cation Request Report & Decision
LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A
Page 4 of 5
The following tables contain an analysis of the criteria outlined in each respective section of
RMC as it relates to the specific modifications requested:
1) Site Plan Modification Criteria Criteria Met
a. Involve more than a ten percent (10%) increase in area or scale of the X
development in the approved plan; or
b. Have a significantly greater impact on the environment and/or public X
facilities than the approved plan; or
c. Change the boundaries of the originally approved plan. X
2) Refuse and Recycling Modification Criteria Criteria Met
3) Driveway Width Modification Criteria
a. Substantially implements the policy direction of the policies and X
objectives of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and the
Community Design Element and the proposed modification is the
minimum adjustment necessary to implement these policies and
objectives;
b. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, X
environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code
requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment;
c. Will not be injurious to other property(ies) in the vicinity; X
d. Conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code; X
e. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation X
intended; and
f. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. X
4) Design District Guideline Lighting Criteria Met
5) Design District Guideline Service Element Location and Design
Guidelines: Lighting that improves pedestrian safety and also that creates X
visual interest in the building and site during the evening hours shall be
provided.
Guidelines: Service elements shall be concentrated and located so that X
impacts to pedestrians and other abutting uses are minimized. The impacts
City of Renton Deportment of Comr
QFC Fuel Center #871
Report of April 8, 2014
rand Economic Development Administrative
of service elements shall be mitigated with landscaping and an enclosure
with fencing that is made of quality materials.
DECISION
icotion Request Report & Decision
LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A
Page 5 of 5
The proposal satisfies all the criteria specified for each modification as demonstrated above.
Therefore, the 5 modification as indicated above for QFC Fuel Center #871, Project Number
LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A, are approved.
C.E. "Chip" Vincent, CED Administrator
4 /r/2011
I
Date
The decision to approve the modification(s) will become final if not appealed in writing together
with the required fee to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,
WA 98057 on or before 5:00 pm, on April 22, 2014. Additional information regarding the
appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's office, Renton City Hall-7'h Floor, (425)
430-6510.
If you have any further questions regarding this decision, feel free to contact the project
manager, Vanessa Dolbee, at (425) 430-7314 or vdolbee@rentonwa.gov.
CIVIi FNG.NEF<ING. LAND PLAJJ\ING. Swf"l\lE'l"INC
Mr. C E. Vincent
Director
City of Renton
Planning and Development Department
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, Washington 98057-3232
November 8, 2013
U.S. MAIL DELIVERY
Re: Request for Direct Credit for Traffic Impact Fees
QFC Fuel Center/ Renton Highlands
4615 -4th Street, Renton WA 98057
Permit Numbers B13000880 and B13000881
QFC Store Number 871 / Our Job Number 15432.1
Dear Mr. Vincent:
NOV l :1 ,
Quality Food Centers, Inc., a division of Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., has been pursuing the redevelopment of
a vacant parcel with a fuel center. Over the past months QFC has had numerous discussions regarding
compliance with Renton's design standards, providing you and your staff with an awareness and clear
understanding of the site's physical constraints and the extraordinary costs being incurred by QFC in
pursuing this project.
As you'll recall, one of the measures discussed to be made available by Renton to assist QFC in bring
this project to completion, pending a formal request prior to permit issuance, was an exception allowing
QFC to directly apply traffic impact fees (calculated per vehicle fueling position) to the signal relocation
costs directly related to proposed improvements to the intersection of 4th Street and Duvall Avenue.
Please consider this letter as QFC's formal request for the direct allocation of impact fees to the project-
related intersection improvements detailed in the plans and documentation submitted in conjunction with
the specified permits. With the competitive bidding process yet to be completed on this project, precise
costs related to the signal relocation/street improvements are unavailable, but these costs will easily
exceed the nearly $78,000 projected as impact fees. The signal relocation and related improvements,
combined with the pedestrian amenities proposed for the project, will not only produce full project
compliance with City standards, but also improve use of the intersection by QFC customers and Renton
residents and visitors.
On behalf of my client, I thank you and your staff for this consideration, and for the assistance the City of
Renton has provided throughout this development process. Should you have any questions or require
additional plans and/or documentation, please contact me directly.
Senior Planner
RPM/dm
15432c.019.doc
cc: Bryan Gootee, Quality Food Centers, Inc.
Brian Peterson, Quality Food Centers, Inc.
James Coombes, Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.
Jay Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Chris Ferko, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Jason Hubbell, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.
18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT. WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX
BRANCH OFFICES • TUMWATER, WA • LONG BEACH, CA • WALNUT CREEK, CA • SAN DIEGO, CA
www.barghausen.com
CITY OF RENTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
Date: August 6, 2013
To: City Clerk's Office
From: Stacy M Tucker
Subject: Land Use File Closeout
Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City
Clerk's Office. ,.-_,, _____ ..., __________________________ _
; Project Name:
· LUA (file) Number:
. Cross-References:
, AKA's:
. Project Manager:
Acceptance Date:
• Applicant:
, Owner:
j Contact:
' · PID Number:
ERC Decision Date:
· ERC Appeal Date:
' Administrative Approval:
· Appeal Period Ends:
Public Hearing Date:
. Date Appealed to HEX:
, By Whom:
· HEX Decision:
Date Appealed to Council:
By Whom:
Council Decision:
. Mylar Recording Number:
QFC Fuel Center #871
LUA-12-083, ECF, SA-A
Vanessa Dolbee
October 30, 2012
Tim Hansen
Eastside Funding LLC
Robert McNeil!
1523059124
November 17, 2012
December 7, 2012
November 21, 2012
December 7, 2012
Date:
Date:
Project Description: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan
Review for the construction of a QFC Fuel Center featuring a 3,360 square foot canopy and a 160
., square foot cashier's kiosk at 4615 NE 4th Street. The project would require the installation of a
: 20,000 gallon underground storage for unleaded fuel, and an 18,000 gallon split underground fuel
,...::t.::.ak:.::i.:.,n::a.g..:dc.:ivccid::.:e:,:d:...:b::.:e::.otc.:..:wc::e.::.enc:....:::d.:.::ie:.:s.::.el:...:a::.:n.:.:d:...:s::..:u:..1:p:.:.re::.:mc.:..:.::.e-=uc.:n.:.:le:.:ae::d.::.ed::...;.:fu::..:e:.::I.:..._ _____________ _
Location: 4615 NE 4th Street
Comments:
Denis Law c·
_ _:May:..or ------,,.l~tlrfilll
December 21, 2012
Robert McNeil!
Senior Planner
Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.
18215 72'd Avenue S
Kent, WA 98032
Department of Community and Economic Development
C.E.""Chip"Vincent, Administrator
SUBJECT: Environmental (SEPA) Appeal Period End Notification
QFC Fuel Center #871 / LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A
Dear Mr. McNeil!:
This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended December 7, 2012 for the Environmental
Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance -Mititgated and Administrative Site
Development Plan Review for the above-referenced project.
No appeals were filed on the ERC determination and administrative decision therefore, this decision
is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must
comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures and Site Plan Conditions of Approval, as well as adhere to
the advisory notes listed in the City of Renton Report.and Decision dated November 19, 2012 during
construction and prior to final inspection. Furthermore, the Administrative Site Development Plan
Review decision will expire two (2) years from the date of decision. If you are unable to finalize the
development within the two-year time-frame, a single two (2) year extension may be requested in
writing, pursuant to RMC 4-9-200.
In regards to the vesting of the above referenced project, please be aware that as long as the
development of the project conforms to the approved plans and building permits are submitted
within the relevant time limits, the zoning regulations in effect at the time of the original approval
shall continue to apply. However, all construction shall conform to the International Building Code
and Uniform Fire Code regulations in force at the time of building permit application.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7314.
For the Environmental Review Committee,
~-D~tfuuL
Vanessa Dolbee
Senior Planner
cc: Eastside Funding LLC-c/o Hugh Stewart/ Owner{s)
Tim Hansen-QFC Real Estate Manager/ Applicant
John & Ada Sheen/ Party(ies) of Record
Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way , Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov
ti
King County
Wastewater Treatment Division
Community Services and Environmental Planning
King Street Center, KSC-NR-0505
201 South Jackson Street
Seattle, WA 98104-3855
December 12, 2012
Vanessa Dolbee
Department of Community and Economic Development
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
RE: LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A
Dear Ms. Dolbee:
Sent Via email VDolbee@Rentonwa.gov
City of Renton
Planning Division
DEC 1 ~ 1011
The King County Wastewater Treatment Division has reviewed the Notice of Environmental
Determination-Mitigated (DNS-M) request for Environmental Review and Administrative Site Plat
approval; dated 11/21/2012, for the proposal to construct a QFC Fuel Center featuring a 3360 SF
canopy, a 160 SF cashier's kiosk, 20000 gallon and 18,000 gallon underground fuel storage tank
on a 22,090 SF vacant lot located in a Commercial Arterial zone designation. King County requires
that a capacity charge be applied to any project that constructs a new connection to the sewer
system, any reconnection within five years of a disconnection, or any change in use or building
remodel that includes an increase in plumbing fixtures. King County generally receives notice of
new construction; however, some sewer districts and/or the cities that represent them have
neglected to report changes in use and tenant improvements that involve an increase in plumbing
fixtures.
In an attempt to remedy this problem, we are sending this reminder to you in response to the
Environmental DNS-M review request. We ask that you forward this reminder to the sewer district
or city department responsible for Sewer Use Certification forms:
Please complete and send a Commercial Sewer Use Certification form for the above
project to the King County Capacity Charge Program in a timely manner. The form should
be sent to Ericka Stewart, Capacity Charge Program, KSC-NR-0502, at the address
above. If you need additional forms or have questions about the program, please call
Ms. Stewart at 206-684-1060.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal.
Sincerely,
Bibiana Ocheke-Ameh
Administrative Staff Assistant
Community Services and Environmental Planning
cc: Ericka Stewart, Project Manager, Capacity Charge Program
CREATING RESOURCES FROM WASTEWATER
STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING }
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
PUBLIC NOTICE
Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal
Advertising Representative of the
Renton Reporter
a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of
general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months
prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in
the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King
County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as
a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of
Washington for King County.
The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues
of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was
regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.
The annexed notice, a:
Public Notice
was published on November 23, 2012.
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is
the sum of$ IO 1.50, ~~:~_ .. :,.. ... :-'-''~:t:\1,1 h1
.// ' . L· aft /fl J,,·/tJ "·
Linda M. Mills
Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter
Subscribed and sworn to me this 23rd day of November, 2012.
___ ..... ,._o ::;J'f,1,-:-.??/1,, ''1,
---,-.-~ .·-··'''"''\\\-~·'.</ '1,
i$f ff :;'~1t\':,\
1;;_::-0 ,,,. o :o~ .:, ,...:_. -.:-,o . < 3 1-· -::. ,:, ... 1, p1j"<c"' (,:, _-:: (? -;:;
,-) .-'-,
_ .. rz ·1 {J,,.:·,.._ ,~ (:~_.c_ )iu c 1K t'-·-!·--
Kathleen C. Sherman, Notary Public for the State of Washington,
Residing in Buckley, Washington
-'.,_ 't,. o> -~ ;:; ::=
i· '111 4 '\.) ..... -= :'-.;: = '\,,~·~?',"ti::t::,!'f~
·II 1 \\; .\\ \','-, ,,:-,.·,...,
NOTICE OF
J:'.\VIRONMENTAI.
DETERMINATION
nVIRONMENTAL
REVIEW COMMITTEE
RIXIO\, WASHl~GTON
The Environmental Review
Committee has issued a Determi-
nation of Non-S1gniticancc-Miti-
gated (DNS-M} for the following
project under the authority of Lhe
Renton Municipal Code
QFC Fuel Center #971
LUA 12-083, ECF. SA-A
Location: 4615 NF 4th Street
The construction of a QFC
Fuel Center li:aturing a 3,360
SF canopy. a 160 SF cashier"s
kiosk, 20.000 gallon and
18.000 gallon underground fuel
storage tank at 4015 NE 4th St
The vacant site is located in Lhe
CA zone and is 22.092 Sr: in
s1z,;;: Approximately 2.699 SF
would ht! ded1catt:d to public
ROW and 2,80\l cu yd. of cut
and flll activates 1s expected
The site is located in the Aqui-
fer Protection Zone 2. no other
critical areas exist on the
subject site. A Stormwater
study. traffic study. gcokchni-
cal report, and a critical areas
reconnaissance were submitted
Appcc1ls of the DNS-M must
be filed in writing on or before
500 pm. on December 7. 2012.
together with the required Ice
with: Hearing F.xaminer, City of
Renton. 1055 South Grady Way,
Renton. WA 98057 Appeals to
the Exammer arc governed hy
RMC 4-8-110 and more informa-
tion may be obtc1incd from the
City Clerk's Office.
(425)430-6510
Published in the Renton Reporter
on November 23. 2012 #706562
NOTICE
OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION Of NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M)
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PEflSONS OF AN EN\IIRONMENTAL ACTION
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT NUMBER:
lOCATIOl'I:
QFC fuol Cent,,r H71
lUAl2-0ll3, ECF, 5A-A
4615NE4"'Strect
DESCRIPTION: The appncanl ha, req11,,.u,d SEPA En,lronmttnlal Rul•w and Sit• Pion Rovl•w
far thll conriruct!on of• QFC Fu•I C.ntar fHturlns • 3,300 1quaro foot ""°PY and a 150 square foot cashier'<
kla,S ot 4615 NE 4th stnirt Tho pra)@d wDUld requlr. the Installation of• 20,000 gallon under1roond !!Ori>!:•
t.ink for unleaded fuol, and an 18,000 gatton I/lilt undelllround fuel tank dMded betw'°"n dleHl 1nd ,upromo
unloaded f...,I. The vacant ,ite II O,cated In the (ommorclal Atleflal (CA) 1one and Is 2.2,091,quoro IHI In ,IH. A
lim"•d rlKhl~n/M1ht-out KC<JS Is prapaood alonr NE 4th St, .. t and hill ocr,,. I, propo,ed for Dunll Avenue NE.
llppn»dmately 2,sgg ,~uH"I! feel would bo dedicatod lo publlt rlshl of woy and 2,100 t>Jblt yards of wt and flll
Ktl..,,111 ls axperted u a re,u~ or the a~plltatl<ln. There are 20 ••l.,ln1 tree, on the ,ltt, ti><, •ppl!unt has
proposed ta dear !he site and ,.,plant with W no .. ,,., ... The >lte I, located In the Aqulf<r ProtKtion Zone 2, no
athot crttlul arn, o,./,t on the sub]e<t :11\e. A S!ormwO!er ,tudy, lfilffh: ,tudy, 1aotuhnlcal roport, ,ncl • orttl<.al
"'""' reamnalsso""" '""'" submitted with t:l>e ap~l<-11tlon.
THE cm OF RENTON ENVlRONMENTII.L REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) KAS DETERMINED nlAT THE PROPOSED
ACTION D0E5 NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVfRSE lMPACT ON THE eNVIRONMENT
Appnl, orth• Rnvlronm•ntal determination must be med ln wrlllnl[ on or before 5:00 p.m. on Oot=hr 7,
2012, !<>11.-th•r with Iha Ntquired fee with: HHrlng El<amlner, City of Ranlon, l05S Soutl, Grady Way,
Ronton, WA 98057. App•al, to the Examiner are governed by Oty of RMC 4-8-110 and Information
rogardlllJI th• appeal pro~ss may be obtained from the Renton City aerk's Offke, 1415) 430-6510.
If nlE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION 15 APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING Will BE SET AND ALL PARTIES
NOTIFIED. --..,~
I j •
' ~:!Gt--
:·,~~
''"'""''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT(425) 430-7200.
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTif!CATION.
CERTIFICATION
I, hereby certify that .S copies of the above document
were posted in___,_,__ conspicuous places or nearby the described propertv on
Date: I 1/Zj/fZ,,
STATE OF WASHINGTON
ss
COUNTY OF KING
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Gr , ,', n <Y' /:i ,' i +-
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the
uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
"" ~''"'""''' JI ~ 2 I 2C I 2-,Sf' ~
-,-,1. -~-~ ff ~~$ .. , -_,,-·~•'\ 1e rt, ; ~! ,.,.•v '-o I ,,,,. ... 0 , J.~~ i :c i a ,. • '4 fl)1 ! I
...0: 1 .. ..., ..... '!.-;, ~ ;,;..:, p\)•ftt.,::: ~: ~ ,, l'ti"V ,F '!'C -~ 111, 8""'"' ,$" o; = 1, "11 h1'"'".,., .............. ff 11,,11 ,.-4 TE of ,.$ ,,, ~,,,
'"'"""'"
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Notary (Print): H ' l-, 't'
My a ppoi ntm ent exp i res: __ -',A""-,..,~'"11_,"", ''---"' '"'~-1"';' _,-"-l"'Cc.,;,.l 7L) ____ _
CITY OF RENTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
On the 21st day of November, 2012, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing
ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to:
Name Representing
Agencies See Attached
Robert McNeil! Contact
Tim Hansen, Quality Food Centers, Inc. Applicant
Hugh Stewart, Eastside Funding LLC Owner
John & Ada Sheen Party of Record
--i-i.,, A,. , ,1 , "''"''""'"'''' (Signature of Sender): J/l~ $.:,."tAJ,BE~ ,,,,,,
§ ~~''"1t ,,,.
= ... ·r ·~. -Is -,,. \ ~
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) E ~~ 0~tJI.~ • \ ... ~
) ss s • , • i O :::: i .. It _,_~
COUNTY OF KING ) \ \~ ,..,,._",.. .... "'} I g
I a ...... ~-~ :
1 "~ ... ""~'''~ ~-.:
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker i,,,, "'l Of ,flt"~~
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act fo~llll..t~#purposes
mentioned in the instrument.
Dated: 1'; ·-.. ,,...,,+,_/ .... n ; f s:.1 :· ·' ·l. ' /'
Notary Pubtic in and for the State of Washington
Notary (Print):. _____ ;.,_· .,:.A,_. _....c.c-~...:.,-.e.:>c:.· ~c.c'.:c":_.._· _____________ _
My appointment expires:
Project Name: QFC Fuel Station #871
.
Project Number: LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A
template -affidavit of service by mailing
• > -
Dept. of Ecology**
Environmental Review Section
PO Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
WSDOT Northwest Region*
Attn: Ramin Pazooki
King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240
PO Box 330310
Seattle, WA 98133-9710
US Army Corp. of Engineers*
Seattle District Office
Attn: SEPA Reviewer
PO Box C-3755
Seattle, WA 98124
Boyd Powers *
Depart. of Natural Resources
PO Box 47015
Olympia, WA 98504-7015
KC Dev. & Environmental Serv.
Attn: SEPA Section
900 Oakesdale Ave. SW
Renton, WA 98055-1219
Metro Transit
Senior Environmental Planner
Gary Kriedt
201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431
Seattle, WA 98104-3856
Seattle Public Utilities
Real Estate Services
Attn: SEPA Coordinator
700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900
PO Box 34018
Seattle, WA 98124-4018
AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING
(ERC DETERMINATIONS)
WDFW -Larry Fisher* Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept.*
1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer
Issaquah, WA 98027 39015-172°d Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092
Duwamish Tribal Office* Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program*
4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert
Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 17t1d Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092-9763
KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation*
Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Gretchen Kaehler
Ms. Shirley Marroquin PO Box48343
201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Olympia, WA 98504-8343
Seattle, WA 98104-3855
City of Newcastle City of Kent
Attn: Steve Roberge Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP
Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director
13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South
Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895
Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila
Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official
Joe Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd.
PO Box 90868, MS; XRD-01 W Tukwila, WA 98188
Bellevue, WA 98009-0868
*Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS'1
, the marked agencies and cities
will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of
Application.
**Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to
the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov
template -affidavit of service by mailing
r $12 City of 'I ;, . . r·. ·(--·. -r ~··s f1J1 ___ Jil
OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M)
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS Of AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT NUMBER:
LOCATION:
QFC Fuel Center #871
LUA12-0S3, ECF, SA-A
4615 NE 4th Street
DESCRIPTION: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review
for the construction of a QFC Fuel Center featuring a 3,360 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot cashier's
kiosk at 4615 NE 4th Street. The project would require the installation of a 20,000 gallon underground storage
tank for unleaded fuel, and an 18,000 gallon split underground fuel tank divided between diesel and supreme
unleaded fuel. The vacant site is located in the Commercial Arterial {CA) zone and is 22,092 square feet in size. A
limited right-in/right-out access is proposed along NE 4th Street and full access is proposed for Duvall Avenue NE.
Approximately 2,699 square feet would be dedicated to public right of way and 2,800 cubic yards of cut and fill
activates is expected as a result of the application. There are 20 existing trees on the site, the applicant has
proposed to clear the site and replant with 20 new trees. The site is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2, no
other critical areas exist on the subject site. A Stormwater study, traffic study, geotechnical report, and a critical
areas reconnaissance were submitted with the application.
THE CITY Of RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE (ER[) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED
ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before S:00 p.m. on December 7,
2012, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way,
Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of RMC 4-8-110 and information
regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
If THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES
NOTIFIED.
Denis Law
-~May:or ______ .. r
. t.
November 21, 2012
Robert McNeil!
Senior Planner
·~ """'"-'
Department of Community and Economic Development
C.E. "Chi p"Vincent, Administrator
Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.
18215 72nd Avenue S
Kent, WA 98032
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL {SEPAi THRESHOLD DETERMINATION
QFC Fuel Center #871, LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A
Dear Mr. McNeil!:
This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise
you that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a
threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures.
Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report, for a list of the Mitigation Measures.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before S:00
p.m. on December 7, 2012, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City
of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are
governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be
obtained from the City Clerk's Office, {425) 430-6510.
If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all
parties notified. If you have any further questions, please call me at {425) 430-7314.
For the Environmental Review Committee,
Vanessa Dolbee
Senior Planner
Enclosure
cc: Hugh Stewart -Eastside Funding LLC / Owner(s)
Tim Hansen -Quality Food Centers, Inc./ Applicant
John & Ada Sheen/ Party(ies) of Record
Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov
City of , rlrc,r1 -· _,;; . ..,,. .._) --·~ ,_
November 21, 2012
Department of Community and Economic Development
C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator
Washington State
Department of Ecology
Environmental Review Section
PO Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPAi THRESHOLD DETERMINATION
Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following
project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on November 19,
2012:
SEPA DETERMINATION: Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated (DNSM}
PROJECT NAME: QFC Fuel Center #871
PROJECT NUMBER: LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before S:00
p.m. on December 7, 2012, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City
of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are
governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be
obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete
details. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7314.
For the Environmental Review Committee,
~-DolbeJL
Vanessa Dolbee
Senior Planner
Enclosure
cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division
Boyd Powers, Department of Natural Resources
Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program
Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation
Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, NW Region
Larry Fisher, WDFW
Duwamish Tribal Office
US Army Corp. of Engineers
Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED {DNSM)
MITIGATION MEASURES, CONDITIONS, AND ADVISORY NOTES
PROJECT NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
PROJECT NAME:
LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A
Tim Hansen, Quality Food Centers, Inc.
QFC Fuel Center #871
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant is requesting Environmental {SEPA) Review and
Administrative Site Plat approval in order to construct a QFC Fuel Center featuring a 3,360 SF
canopy, a 160 SF cashier's kiosk, 20,000 gallon and 18,000 gallon underground fuel storage tank
on a 22,092 square foot vacant lot located in the Commercial Arterial zone designation.
PROJECT LOCATION:
LEAD AGENCY:
MITIGATION MEASURES:
4615 NE 4th Street
The City of Renton
Department of Community & Economic Development
Planning Division
1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations included in the Geotechnical
Engineering Report prepared by the Riley Group, Inc., dated August 22, 2012.
2. The applicant shall pay a Transportation Impact fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal
Code. The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code.
3. The applicant shall pay a Fire Impact fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code prior
to building permit issuance.
CONDTIONS:
1. The applicant shall comply with the three mitigation measures issued as part of the
Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated, dated November 19, 2012
2. The applicant shall provide an updated site plan which clearly identifies compliance with
setback standards for review and approval by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to
building permit issuance.
3. The applicant shall be required to submit a final landscape plan, including details for vertical
elements, for review and approval by the Currently Planning Project Manager prior to
building permit issuance.
4. The applicant shall either provide a site-to-site vehicle access between the subject site and
the south CA zone property or apply for and receive an approval for a variance from the
site-to-side vehicle access requirement. Either a new site plan depicting site-to-site access
shall be provided for review and approval prior to building permit issuance or an approved
variance shall be obtained prior to building permit issuance.
5. The applicant shall provide documentation at building permit application verifying
compliance with RMC 4-3-0SOH.2.d; which shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire
Department, Water Utility Division and the Current Planning Project Manager prior to
Building Permit Issuance.
6. The applicant shall provide an updated site plan depicting the parking stall without ADA
labeling for review and approval by the Building Department and the Current Planning
Project Manager prior to building permit issuance.
7. The applicant shall submit revised elevations for the refuse and recyclable enclosure
depicting a roof. The revised elevations shall be submitted to and approved by the Current
Planning Project Manager prior to building permit issuance.
8. The applicant shall provide an updated site plan identifying compliance with the 20-foot
minimum standard for the public plaza space. This shall be reviewed and approved by the
Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit issuance.
9. Final color elevations and materials shall be provided to the Current Planning Project
Manager for review and approval prior to building permit issuance. Detailing such as roof
details and material types should be provided with the updated submittal.
10. The applicant shall submit a comprehensive signage package which eliminates the use of
back lit cabinet signage and is compatible with the proposed development and is
appropriate for the location. The revised signage package shall be submitted to and
approved by the Current Planning Manager prior to sign permit approval.
11. A lighting plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Current Planning Project
Manager prior to building permit issuance. The proposed lighting plan shall comply the
Design District standards and light trespassing standards.
12. The applicant shall provide a detail of all utility screening for both the generator and roof
mounted equipment that may be located on the canopy and/or kiosk structure. The
screening details shall be provided to the Current Planning Project Manager for review and
approval prior to building permit issuance.
ADIVISORV NOTES:
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the
administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are
not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions.
Planning:
1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through
Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development
Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any
time if complaints are received.
ERC Mitigation Measures, Conditions, and Advisory Notes Page 2 of S
2. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or
plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of
vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days.
Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current
King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton
may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The
Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection
and approval ofthe permit.
3. Commercial, multi-family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities
shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00)
p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between
nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on
Sundays.
4. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to final occupancy
permits
Water:
1. The preliminary fire flow requirement is 1,500 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required. One
fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the proposed building and one hydrant is
required within 300 feet. Existing hydrants can be counted toward the requirement as long
as they meet current code, including 5-inch storz fittings.
2. Installation of a minimum 1" water meter with a RP in a "Hot Box" is required.
3. System Development Charges (SDCs) are based on the total number and size of any and all
water meters. The SDCs are collected as part of the construction permit.
Sewer
1. This project will need to connect to the existing MH in the intersection of NE 4th St and
Duvall Ave NE with a minimum 6" diameter pipe installing an inside drop connection.
2. A commercial building permit will trigger a separate review.
3. Separate drains for the concrete islands are required to be connected to an oil water
separator downstream in a vault in a positive direction. A shut off valve is required to be
installed.
4. This site is located in the East Renton Special Assessment District (SAD 0002). This fee is
$.0973 per square foot of the parcel of land and is required to be paid prior to issuance of a
construction permit.
5. SDCs are based on the size of the domestic water meter. The SDCs are collected as part of
the construction permit.
Surface Water:
1. The conceptual drainage plan and report was submitted with the formal application and is
under review at this time. The project shall comply with the City of Renton Amendments to
the 2009 King County Surface Water Design.
ERC Mitigation Measures, Conditions, and Advisory Notes Page 3 of 5
2. The applicant's civil engineer will look in the Manual under Section 1.2.3.1, Area-Specific
Flow Control Facility Requirement. This site is located, per the Flow Control Application
Map, in the Flow Control Duration Standard (Forested Conditions).
3. Surface Water SDC fees are $0.405 per square foot of new impervious area. These fees are
collected at the time a construction permit is issued.
Transportation:
1. Per the NE 3rd/NE 4th St Corridor Plan, construction of the typical street section needs to
match the existing curb on NE 4th St. This will include two 11-foot travel lanes, a two way
left hand turn lane, and a 5-foot bike lane adjacent to the new curb. The typical street
section needs to show a 5-foot sidewalk separated from the roadway curb and adjacent to
the new property line, with a 5-foot planting strip including street trees on NE 4th St.
Additional right-of-way will be required to achieve the above.
2. Per City of Renton code, all lot corners at intersections of dedicated public rights-of-way
shall have a minimum radius of 25 feet. The curb return at the intersection of the two
arterials NE 4th St and Duvall Ave NE shall be R = 35.
3. The project and plans need to include the relocation of the traffic signal pole and controller,
located at NE 4th St & Duvall, as a part of this development.
4. The driveway access on NE 4th St needs to be right turn in and right turn out only, due to
the close proximity to the Duvall Ave NE intersection.
5. The Civil Plan set shall include the channelization plan (striping, buttons, arrows) on Duvall
Ave NE.
6. The typical road section for Duvall Ave NE is 20-feet of pavement centerline to face of curb,
a 5-foot planting strip, and 5-foot sidewalk adjacent to property line.
7. Street lighting will be required to be installed fronting the parcel being developed.
8. A fill source statement will be required for any fill imported to the site.
Fire:
1. The preliminary fire flow requirement if 1,500 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required. One
fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed building and one hydrant is
required within 300-feet. Existing hydrants can be counted toward the requirement as long
as they meet current code, including 5-inch storz fittings. It appears adequate fire flow and
fire hydrants exist in the this area.
2. Separate plans and permits are required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for
review and permitting of all underground fuel tanks and a tank monitoring systems.
3. All new commercial fuel dispensing facilities shall be provided with an approved on site
standby power system to facilitate fuel dispensing during local power outages or disaster
4. Fire department apparatus access is adequate
5. An electronic site plan is required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for pre-
fire planning purposes prior to occupancy of the building.
ERC Mitigation Measures, Conditions, and Advisory Notes Page 4 of 5
General :
1. All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals,
prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer.
2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical
Control Network.
3. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of
the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the
remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service
related expenses. See Drafting Standards.
ERC Mitigation Measures, Conditions, and Advisory Notes Page 5 of 5
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
PROJECT NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
PROJECT NAME:
-MITIGATED (DNS-M)
LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A
Tim Hansen, Quality Food Centers, Inc.
QFC Fuel Center #871
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative
Site Plat approval in order to construct a QFC Fuel Center featuring a 3,360 SF canopy, a 160 SF cashier's kiosk,
20,000 gallon and 18,000 gallon underground fuel storage tank on a 22,092 square foot vacant lot located in the
Commercial Arterial zone designation.
PROJECT LOCATION:
LEAD AGENCY:
4615 NE 4th Street
City of Renton
Environmental Review Committee
Department of Community & Economic Development
The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under
their authority of Section 4-9-070D Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental
impacts identified during the environmental review process. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the
lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on December 7, 2012.
Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South
Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be
obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
PUBLICATION DATE:
DATE OF DECISION:
SIGNATURES:
dmm1s rator
partment
/~~&
Terry Higashiyama, Administrator
Community Services Department
November 23, 2012
November 19, 2012
Date
Date
Mark Peterson, Administrator
Fire & Emergency S rvices
C~.
C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator
Department of Community &
Economic Development
;;/;i/;L
~
Date
DEPARTMENT OF COM11/IUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
TO;
FROM;
MEETING DATE;
TIME;
LOCATION;
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE
MEETING AGENDA
Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator
Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator
Mark Peterson, Fire & Emergency Services Administrator
C.E. "Chip" Vincent, CED Administrator
Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager
Monday, November 19, 2012
3:00 p.m.
Sixth Floor Conference Room #620
Taxiway B Rehabilitation Project
LUA12-052, ECF, SME, SP
(Dolbee)
Location: 300 Airport Way. Description: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental
Review, Shoreline Exemption and Special Grade and Fill Permit for a rehabilitation of 341,065
square feet of Taxiway B, located at the Renton Municipal Airport ..
QFC Fuel Center #871 (Dolbee)
LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A
Location: 4615 NE 4th Street. Description: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental
Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a QFC Fuel Center featuring a 3,360 square
foot canopy and a 160 square foot cashiers kiosk.
cc: D. Law 1 Mayor
J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
S. Dale Estey, CED Director•
0. Jacobson, Deputy PW Administrator -Transportation
N. Watts, Development Services Director•
L. Warren, City Attorney•
Phil Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner
0. Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshal•
J. Medzegian, Council
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT AND
ADMINISTRATIVE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REPORT & DECISION
ERC MEETING DATE:
Project Name:
Owner:
Applicant:
Contact:
File Number:
Project Manager:
Project Summary:
Project Location:
Site Area:
STAFF
RECOMMENDATION:
November 19, 2012
QFC Fuel Center #871
Eastside Funding LLC, c/o Hugh Stewart, 3933 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, Suite
100, Kirkland, WA 98033
Tim Hansen, QFC Real Estate Manager, Quality Food Centers, Inc., 10116 NE 8th
Street, Bellevue, WA 98004
Robert McNeil!, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., 18215 72"' Avenue S, Kent,
WA98032
LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A
Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner
The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for
the construction of a QFC Fuel Center featuring a 3,360 square foot canopy and a
160 square foot cashier's kiosk at 4615 NE 4th Street. The project would require
the installation of a 20,000 gallon underground storage tank for unleaded fuel,
and an 18,000 gallon split underground fuel tank divided between diesel and
supreme unleaded fuel. The vacant site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA)
zone and is 22,092 square feet in size. A limited right-in/right-out access is
proposed along NE 4th Street and full access is proposed for Duvall Avenue NE.
Approximately 2,699 square feet would be dedicated to public right of way and
2,800 cubic yards of cut and fill activates is expected as a result of the application.
There are 20 existing trees on the site, the applicant has proposed to clear the site
and replant with 20 new trees. The site is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone
2, no other critical areas exist on the subject site. A Stormwater study, traffic
study, geotechnical report, and a critical areas reconnaissance were submitted
with the application.
4615 NE 4th Street
22,092 SF Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross}: 3,360 SF canopy
106 SF kiosk
Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a
Determination of Non-Significance (DNS-M).
Project Location Map ERC and Site Plan Report 12-083.doc
I A. EXHIBITS:
Exhibit 1: Neighborhood Detail Map
Exhibit 2: Color Elevations, updated e-mail submittal
Exhibit 3: Exterior Elevations and Signage, updated e-mail submittal
Exhibit 4: Site Improvement Plan, updated e-mail submittal
Exhibit 5: Landscape Planting and Plaza Plan, updated e-mail submittal
Exhibit 6: Grading Plan
Exhibit 7: Storm Drainage Plan
Exhibit 8: Sanitary Sewer and Water Plan
Exhibit 9: Significant Tree Plan
Exhibit 10: Trash Enclosure Details I 8. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Owner(s) of Record:
Eastside Funding LLC
c/o Hugh Stewart
3933 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, Suite 100
Kirkland, WA 98033
2. Zoning Designation:
3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation:
4. Existing Site Use:
5. Neighborhood Characteristics:
a. North: Strip Commerciol {RM-F zone)
b. East: Doiry Queen /CA zone)
c. South: Strip Commercio/ /CA zone)
d. West: Strip Commercial {CA zane)
6. Site Area: 0.51 acres
I C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND:
Action
Comprehensive Plan
Zoning
Annexation
I D. PUBLIC SERVICES:
1. Existing Utilities
Land Use File No.
N/A
N/A
N/A
Commercial Arterial (CA)
Commercial Corridor (CC)
Vacant land
Ordinance No.
5099
5100
3946
Date
11/01/04
11/01/04
10/16/1985
a. Water: There is an existing 8" Cl water main located in NE 4th Street and an existing 8" water
main in Duvall Avenue NE. This project is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2.
b. Sewer: There is an existing 24" sanitary sewer main located in NE 4th Street.
Project Location Map ERC and Site Plan Report 12-083.doc
City of Renton Department of Community ,nomic Development Environmental R , Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report
QFC FUEL CENTER #871 WAll-083, SA-A, ECF
Report of November 19, 2012 Page 3 of 31
c. Surface/Storm Water: There are storm drainage facilities in NE 4th Street and in Duvall Avenue
NE.
2. Streets: There is partial sidewalk, curb, gutter, and street lighting fronting the corner of the site. No
other street improvements currently exist on along the site frontage.
3. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department
E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE:
1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts
a. Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts
b. Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table
c. Section 4-2-120: Development Standards for Commercial Zoning Classifications
2. Chapter 3 Land Use Districts
a. Section 4-2-020: Critical Area Regulations
b. Section 4-3-100: Urban Design Regulations
3. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards
4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards
a. Section 4-6-060: Street Standards
S. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria
a. Section 4-7-200: Site Plan Review
6. Chapter 11 Definitions
G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
1. Land Use Element
2. Community Design Element
I H. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project
impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental
regulations.
1. Environmental Threshold Determination
Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials:
Issue a DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period.
2. Mitigation Measures
1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations included in the Geotechnical Engineering
Report prepared by the Riley Group, Inc., dated August 22, 2012.
2. The applicant shall pay a Transportation Impact fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code.
The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code.
3. The applicant shall pay a Fire Impact fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code prior to
building permit issuance.
ERC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Department of Community
QFC FUEL CENTER #871
Report of November 19, 2012
3. Environmental Impacts
nomic Development Environmental Re• · Committee & Administrative Site Pion Report
LUA12-083, SA-A, ECF
Page 4 of 31
The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether
the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in
conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to
have the following probable impacts:
a. Earth
Impacts: The site relatively flat with an overall elevation difference less than 5 feet. The site is currently
vacant; however the site used to be a gas station and convenience store. Reminisce from the sites past use
still exists on the subject property including broken asphalt and/or concrete pavement, stone/dirt surfaces
and unplanned landscaping. The applicant has indicated that the project would result in approxamily 2,800
cubic yards of material would be affected by site grading activities, specifically related to excavation for the
two underground fuel storage tanks. Furthermore it is anticipated that following construction, the subject
site would be covered by approximately 90 percent impervious surface area.
The applicant provided a Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by the Riley Group, Inc., dated August
22, 2012. The Engineer visited the site on August 9, 2012 and drilled two test borings to a maximum depth
of 26 feet below the ground surface. The result of the two borings identified that the site is underlain by
over 25 feet of very dense glacial till which consists of silty sand with gravel. The report stated that the
groundwater table was not encountered during the field exploration; however fluctuation in groundwater
level should be expected on a seasonal and annual basis. It is anticipated that ground water would not
likely affect construction activities. Moreover, the report concludes that the site is suitable for the proposed
project from a geotechnical standpoint and that the native soil is suitable for supporting the proposed
foundations and fuel storage tanks. Finally, the report includes recommendations for site preparation and
grading, structural fill, excavations and shoring, underground storage tanks, foundations, kiosk slab-on-
grade, drainage, utilities, and pavements. As such, staff recommends as a mitigation measure that the
applicant comply with the recommendations included in the provided Geotechnical Engineering Report.
The applicant will be required to design a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP)
pursuant to the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual Erosion and Sediment Control
Requirements.
Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall comply with the recommendations included in the Geotechnical
Engineering Report prepared by the Riley Group, Inc., dated August 22, 2012.
Nexus: SEPA Environmental Review, RMC 4-3-050 Critical Areas Regulations, RMC 4-4-060 Grading,
Excavation and Mining Regulations.
b. Air
Impacts: It is not anticipated that the project would significantly impact air quality. Any impacts would be
from construction and future operations, including customer traffic. Air impacts from construction would
be temporary and would be limited in duration. The applicant has indicated that construction vehicle
emission would be controlled through the use of factory-installed mufflers and spark arrestors, reducing
the amount of noxious emissions and noise and helping to control airborne dispersal. Furthermore, the
Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (TESCP) would further reduce airborne particulates related
to dust by controlled watering of the grounds during construction.
Following construction, the operation of the fuel center would result in such emissions as carbon monoxide
(CO), nitrogen oxides (NOXs), sulfur oxides (SOXs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), hydrocarbons, and
related airborne pollutants typically associated with the use of fossil fuels. The applicant has indicated that
impacts to air pollutions would be minimized by installing vapor recovery systems and equipment fully
certified by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) in all stages of fuel distribution process. The CARB
ERC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Department of Community,
QFC FUEL CENTER #871
,omic Development Environmental Re · Committee & Administrative Site Pion Report
LUA12-083, SA-A, ECF
Report of November 19, 2012 Page 5 of 31
dual-point systems would be used to reduce vapor release/emissions during deliveries and at the
dispensers. These systems would reduce and/or recover vapors.
Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended.
Nexus: Not applicable.
c. Water
I. Wetland, Streams, Lakes
Impacts: The City of Renton Water Class Map identifies Maplewood Creek, a Class 4 stream and
wetlands located on and near the subject site. However, based on the existing conditions in the field,
Maplewood Creek would have to flow through an existing strip commercial building and a parking lot
prior to reaching the southern edge of the development site. In addition to the existing conditions of
the site and surrounding development the applicant provided a Critical Areas Review, prepared by
Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC, dated March 21, 2012. The Biologist visited the site and identified that
no hydrophtic plant communities were located at the site. In addition, the Biologist analyzed borings
throughout the vegetated portion of the property. The borings revealed dry, non-hydric, high chorma
soils and no evidence of ponding or prolonged soil saturation anywhere on the site. As such the
provided Critical Areas Report concludes that no wetland or streams are located on or adjacent to the
property. Staff supports the above conclusions based on the report's findings and the developed
conditions in the field.
Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended.
Nexus: Not applicable.
II. Ground Water
Impacts: The site is located in the Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. The project proposes to store
hazardous materials on site. As such, the project will be subject to additional requirements under RMC
4-3-0SOH.2.d, which may include but is not limited to secondary containment, hazardous material
monitoring, emergency collection devices, inspection of containment and emergency equipment, and
employee training. Hazardous materials shall not be spilled, leaked, emitted, discharged, disposed, or
allowed to escape or leach into the air, into groundwater, surface water, surface soils or subsurface
soils. With the exception of intentional withdrawals of hazardous materials for the purpose of
legitimate sale, use, or disposal and discharges permitted under federal, state, or local law.
Additionally, if the project involves the placement of more than one hundred (100) cubic yards of
imported fill, then a source statement would be required for each source location from which imported
fill will be obtained.
The applicant has indicated that stormwater runoff from the concrete drive pad under the proposed
canopy could be contaminated with oil, unspent hydrocarbons and other contaminants. Stormwater
runoff from the concrete drive slab/pad located beneath the fuel canopy would be collected and
subsequently conveyed through an oil/water separator, and then discharged into the sanitary sewer
system instead of the storm system. This would reduce potential pollutants from entering the storm
system.
Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended.
Nexus: Not applicable.
Ill. Storm Water
Impacts: A Technical Information Report prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated
September 19, 2012 was submitted with the application. The provided Tl R identifies that under
current conditions stormwater from the subject site sheet flows southeast to Duvall Avenue NE. In
ERC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Deportment of Community,
QFC FUEL CENTER #871
Report of November 19, 2012
1omic Development Environmental Re · Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report
WAll-083, SA-A, ECF
Page 6 of 31
addition to the on-site flow approximately a 0.06 acre area upstream contributes to the runoff to
Duvall Avenue NE. The TIR identifies that the upstream basin stormwater would be routed through
the onsite detention and water quality system and would discharge close to existing conditions at the
southeast corner of the property.
The provided TIR utilized the City of Renton Amendments to the 2009 King County Surface Water
Design Manual (KCSWDM) for the flow control and water quality facility analysis and design. Based
on the KCSWDM the site is considered to be till forest for the pre-development calculations,
furthermore the 0.06 acre off site upstream drainage basin would be considered till grass. The
applicant has prosper to provide flow control in the form of a wet/detention vault located in the
southeast corner of the project site that would discharge to the existing conveyance system along
Duvall Avenue NE. The applicant has proposed to meet the Enhanced Basic Water Quality
requirements by providing 3 feet of dead storage in the water quality and detention vault and a
three-cartridge Stormfilter manhole with CSF media downstream of the detention.
The TIR further identifies that the canopy covering over the fuel dispensing island as well as routing
the under-canopy drainage through an oil/water separator prior to discharging would accommodate
the project special requirements for source control.
Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended.
Nexus: Not applicable.
d. Transportation
Impacts: The site has two public street frontages, NE 4th Street and Duvall Avenue NE. The existing site
currently gains access from both streets, however there street frontage improvements do not currently
exist along either frontage. The applicant has proposed two access points, one right-in and right-out along
NE 4th Street and a second access point along Duvall Avenue NE. The two access points would facilitate
vehicular mobility throughout the site by providing for opportunities to reduce vehicular stacking at the fuel
pumps. NE 4th Street is considered an arterial and Duvall Avenue NE is a collector street. As designed the
primary access point is located off of Duvall Avenue NE, reducing impacts to NE 4th Street.
The applicant submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by Transportation Engineering North West
(TENW), dated September 10, 2012. Based on the provided study the project would generate 704 weekday
daily trips of which 64 trips would occur during the weekday PM peak hour. However, the study utilized a
unique methodology calculating 28 percent of the trips as "linked trips" to account for QFC rewords card
members that would be coming from the QFC grocery store located across the intersection of NE 4th Street
and Duvall Avenue NE. The linked trips reduced the overall trip count by 472 trips and the PM peak hour
trips by 28. However, "linked trips" where included in the intersection traffic counts and the driveway
counts to determine Level of Service. The City may not accept the methodology of "linked trips" when
determining the impact fees associated with the subject development. However, the conclusions of the
overall transportation impacts included in the provide analysis appear to be consistent with standard
transportation analysis methodology.
Table 2 of the TENW report concludes that the site driveway on NE 4th Street would function at a LOS C and
the Duvall Avenue Driveway would function at a LOS B for left-right existing and A for left-thru entering.
Therefore the two driveways are expected to operate at acceptable levels in the 2013 project horizon year.
In addition the Traffic Analysis addresses the NE 4th Street and Duvall Avenue NE intersection. The results
of the LOS analysis indicated that the intersection is expected to operate at acceptable levels (LOS D) with
the project in 2012. The proposed project would result in a delay increase of less than 4 seconds per
vehicle.
Furthermore, the study identified that the eastbound queues extending from the traffic signal at 4th and
Duvall would periodically block the proposed gas station driveway on NE 4th Street during the PM peak
hour. Due to the traffic volumes along NE 4th Street and the frequency of blockage this driveway has been
ERC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Department of Community
QFC FUEL CENTER #871
Report of November 19, 2012
nomic Development Environmental R Committee & Administrative Sile Plan Report
LUA12-083, SA-A, ECF
Page 7 of 31
restricted to right-in right-out which is anticipated to minimize delays and ensure safe operations at the
driveway. The TENW report also identifies that the queues extending from the traffic signal would
occasionally block the proposed gas station driveway on Duvall during the PM peak hor. This blockage is
expected to occur less frequently than NE 4th Street. The report concludes that despite the occasional
blockages, the signal would create gaps in traffic flow that would allow vehicles to exit the site at regular
intervals.
Overall, the Transportation Analysis concludes that the proposed project would not have a significant
adverse impact on the transportation system and that payment of transportation impact fees would be
adequate to mitigate the project impacts. In order to mitigate transportation impacts, staff recommends a
mitigation measure requiring the applicant to pay an appropriate Transportation Impact Fee. Currently this
fee is assessed at $75.00 per net new average daily trip attributed to the project. However, a new impact
fee will be effective January 1, 2013; therefore the applicant shall pay the fee, as determined by the Renton
Municipal Code.
Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a Transportation Impact fee, as determined by the Renton
Municipal Code. The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code.
Nexus: Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance 5670
e. Fire & Police
Impacts: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicated that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the
proposed development; subject to the condition that the applicant provides Code required improvements
and fees. Therefore, staff recommends a mitigation measure requiring the applicant to pay an appropriate
Fire Impact Fee. Currently this fee is assessed at $0.52 per square foot of building area. However, a new
impact will be effective January 1, 2013; therefore the fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code at
the time of payment shall be paid. The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal
Code prior to building permit issuance.
Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a Fire Impact fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal
Code prior to building permit issuance.
Nexus: Fire Impact Fee Ordinance 5670
4. Comments of Reviewing Departments
The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their
comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant."
I. ADMINSTRATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. The applicant, Tim Hansen, QFC Real Estate Manger, is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review and
Environmental 'SEPA' Review for the construction of a QFC Fuel Center featuring a 3,360 square foot
canopy and a 160 square foot cashier's kiosk.
2. The original application included a request for modifications from pedestrian orientation, architectural
scale, pedestrian plaza size, stacking lanes, landscaping, and refuse and recycling standards. Staff's
initial review of the combined requested modifications concluded that many of the requested
modification would not be supported as the proposal would not meet the guidelines and/or the
modification criteria for approval. Therefore, the applicant submitted new plans, via two e-mails both
dated October 26, 2012. Included in the new plan submittals were new elevation drawings, updated
site plan, updated landscape plan, and new color elevations. As such, Planning Staff will utilize the
drawings submitted in the October 26, 2012 e-mail when reviewing the subject proposal. These plans
are included as Exhibits 2 -5.
ERC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Department of Community -nomic Development Environmental Re · Committee & Administrative Site Pion Report
QFC FUEL CENTER #871 LUAll-083, SA-A, £CF
Report of November 19, 2012 Page 8 of 31
3. The proposed canopy would be 19 feet tall, with a mansard roof projecting above the 19 feet. The kiosk
would be 11 feet tall.
4. The applicant is proposing 1 ADA surface parking stall; the remainder of the "parking" is in the form of
stacking for the fuel pumps.
5. The applicant is requesting a parking modification in order to provide stacking for 16 vehicles instead of
the required 30.
6. The Planning Division of the City of Renton accepted the above master application for review on
September 26, 2012 and determined it complete on October 30, 2012. The project complies with the
120-day review period.
7. The subject site is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of NE 4th Street and Duvall
Avenue NE, at 4615 NE 4th Street.
8. The property is located within the Commercial Corridor (CC) Comprehensive Plan land use designation
and the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning classification.
9. The site is currently vacant. However, historically a gas station was located on the subject site, which
has been demolished and removed.
10. Access to the site would be provided via two curb cuts, a right in right out only along NE 4th Street and a
second curb cut along Duvall Avenue NE.
11. The site is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2; no other critical areas are located on the subject
site.
12. The site relatively flat with an overall elevation difference less than 5 feet.
13. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended),
on November 19, 2012, the City's Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-
Significance -Mitigated (DNS) (Exhibit 6). A 14-day appeal period will commence with this
Administrative Site Plan Review Decision on November 23, 2012 and end on December 7, 2012.
14. Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and
address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file,
and the essence of the comments have been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report
and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of this report.
15. The proposal requires Site Plan Review. The following table contains project elements intended to
comply with Site Plan Review decision criteria, as outlined in RMC 4-9-200.E:
a. COMPR.EHENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE AND CONSISTENCY:
:::/ Y' ' ' ' <· '' ··: ' .. , ', ' ' ' .>.' ' , .. ·' : .. ,.:·-,•
The site is designated Commercial,Corridor {CC) on the Comprehensive Pl.an Land Use Map. -l'he pu(Pose
of CC is to evolve from "strip commerdal" linear,business districts to business areas characterized by
enhanced site planning incorporating efficient parking lot design, coordinated access, amenities; and
boulevard treatment. The proposal is compliant with the following Comprehensive Plan policies:
,/
Policy LU-256. The NE Sunset Boulevard, Northeast Fourth, and Puget Corridors are unique
in the City due to the highly eclectic mix of commercial uses. Similar uses to those found in
these corridors should be fostered as development and redevelopment of properties in
these areas occur over time.
Policy LU-262. Support the redevelopment of commercial business districts located along
ERC/Site Plan Report
Cily of Renlon Department of Community Y nomic Development Environmental Re · , Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report
QFC FUEL CENTER #871 LUAlZ-083, SA-A, ECF
Report of November 19, 2012 Page 9 of 31
principal arterials in the City.
,/ Policy LU-266. Development within defined activity nodes should be subject to additional
design guidelines as delineated in the development standards.
./ Policy LU-268. Public amenity features (e.g. plazas, recreation areas) should be encouraged
as part of new development or redevelopment.
Policy CD-30. Non-residential development should have site plans that provide street access
,/ from a principal arterial, consolidate access points to existing streets, and have internal
vehicular circulation that supports shared access. Curb cuts and internal access should not
conflict with pedestrian circulation.
,/ Policy CD-40. Use design regulations to provide direction on site design, building design,
landscape treatments, and parking and circulation.
Policy CD-55. Landscape buffers, additional setbacks, reduced height, and screening devices
,/ such as berms and fencing should be employed to reduce impacts (e.g. visual, noise, odor,
light) on adjacent, less intensive uses.
,/ Policy CD-82. Landscaping should be required adjacent to freeways and major highways
and other public rights-of-way.
b. ZONING COMPUANC(!.ii.NI>CONISTENCY: . . . :: ...... ···, :t'
The subject site is classified Commercial Arterial (CA) on the. City of Renton Zoning Map. The following
devek>pment standards are applicable to the proposal: · ...
Density: Per RMC 4-2-120A the allowed density range in the CA zoning classification is a minimum of
20 dwelling units per net acre {du/ac) up to a maximum of 60 du/ac. Net density is calculated after
public rights-of-way, private access easements, and critical areas are deducted from the gross
acreage of the site.
Not applicable.
Lot Dimensions: Per RMC 4-2-120A the minimum lot size, in the CA zone, is 5,000 square feet.
Not applicable.
Setbacks: Per RMC 4-2-120A the CA zoning classification requires a minimum front yord setback of 10
feet which may be reduced to zero feet during the site plan development review process, provided
blank walls are not located within the reduced setback. There is o maximum front yard setback of 15
feet. The CA zone has no rear or side yard setback except 15 feet if lot abuts or is adjacent to a
residential zone.
The updated site plan did not provide setbacks; however based on the previously submitted site plan
the canopy would exceed the maximum 15 foot setback.
RMC 4-2-120C states that the maximum front yard setback may be modified by the Reviewing Official
through the site development plan review process if the applicant can demonstrate that the site
development plan meets the following criteria:
a. Orients development to the pedestrian through such measures as providing pedestrian walkways
beyond those required by the Renton Municipal Code (RMC}, encouraging pedestrian amenities and
supporting alternatives to single occupant vehicle {SOV} transportation; and
b. Creates a low scale streetscape through such measures as fostering distinctive architecture and
ERC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Department of Community,
QFC FUEL CENTER 11871
Report of November 19, 2012
1omic Development Environmental Re · • Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report
WA12-083, SA-A, ECF
Page 10 of 31
mitigating the visual dominance of extensive and unbroken parking along the street front; and
c. Promotes safety and visibility through such measures as discouraging the creation of hidden
spaces, minimizing conflict between pedestrian and traffic and ensuring adequate setbacks to
accommodate required parking and/or access that could not be provided otherwise.
Alternatively, the Reviewing Official may also modify the maximum setback requirement if the
applicant can demonstrate that the preceding criteria cannot be met; however, those criteria
which can be met shall be addressed in the site development plan:
d. Due to factors including but not limited to the unique site design requirements or physical site
constraints such as critical areas or utility easements the maximum setback cannot be met; or
e. One or more of the above criteria would not be furthered or would be impaired by compliance
with the maximum setback; or
f. Any function of the use which serves the public health, safety or welfare would be materially
impaired by the required setback.
The applicant has indicated that the projects operational requirements mandate a greater separation
from the property line than specified by code. Physically placing the fuel canopy in a location which
complied with the required maximum setback would virtually eliminate the possibility of vehicle
queuing/stacking and eliminate any operational functionality for the proposed use. The locations
would minimize conflict between pedestrians and. traffic and would preserve public health, safety
and welfare by providing needed separation. It should be noted that the applicant has modified the
layout of the fuel canopy to bring a portion of it as close as possible to the maximum setback line
while maintaining full operational capabilities. Therefore, staff supports a modification to the
maximum front yard setback.
However, no setbacks were identified on the updated site plan. As such, staff recommends a
condition of approval that the applicant provide an updated site plan which clearly identifies
compliance with setback standards at building permit application.
Building Height: Per RMC 4-2-120A building height is restricted to 50 feet unless a conditional use
permit is obtained.
The height of the proposed structure would be 19 feet plus the Mansard Roof. The proposal
complies with the height requirements of the zone.
Building Standards: Per RMC 4-2-120A the allowed lot coverage is 65 percent for proposals within the
CA classification.
The proposed building footprints would be 3,494 square feet on the 22,092 square feet site, resulting
in a building lot coverage of approximately 16 percent.
Landscaping: Per RMC 4-4-070 ten feet of on-site landscaping is required along all public street
frontages, with the exception of areas for required walkways and driveways or those projects with
reduced setbacks.
The applicant is proposing landscaping along NE 4th Street and Duvall Avenue NE. It appears the
ERC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Department of Community,
QFC FUEL CENTER #871
Report of November 19, 2012
nomic Development Environmental Re Committee & Administrative Site Pion Report
LUAll-083, SA-A, ECF
Page 11 of 31
landscape strip is approxamily 10 feet in width and would contain vertical screening elements in
combination with shrubs, ground cover, and trees. However, the provided landscape plan did not
provide the dimensions of the landscape area therefore staff could not verify compliance with the
above standards.
A conceptual landscape plan was submitted via e-mail on October 27, 2012 (Exhibit x). The landscape
plan includes a planting plan; the proposed tree species largely consist of Green Arrow Alaska Cedar,
Japanese Stewart and Imperial Honey Locust as street trees. The shrubs proposed largely consist of:
compact strawberry tree, Blue Oat Grass, Slowmound Dwarf Mugo Pine, and William Penn Barberry.
However a detail of the proposed vertical screening elements was not provided. The applicant shall
be required to submit a final landscape plan, including details for vertical elements, for review and
approval by the Currently Planning Project Manager prior to building permit issuance.
Refuse and Recyclables: Per RMC 4-4-090 for retail/eating and drinking establishments a minimum
of 5 square feet per every 1,000 square feet of building gross floar area shall be provided for
recyclable deposit areas and a minimum of 10 square feet per 1,000 square feet of building gross
floor area shall be provided for refuse deposit areas with a total minimum area of 100 square feet
Based on the proposal for a total of 160 square foot kiosk or retail establishment space; a minimum
area of 100 square feet of refuse and recycle area would be required. The applicant is proposing a
120 square foot refuse and recyclable deposit area in the southwestern corner of the site. The
proposal complies with the refuse and recyclable standards.
Vehicles: Per RMC4-2-120 a connection shall be provided for site-to-site vehicle access ways, where
topographically feasible, to allow a smooth flow of traffic across abutting CA parcels without the need
to use a street. Access may comprise the aisle between rows of parking stalls but is not allowed
between a building and a public street.
This section of code is intended to provide vehicular connections to abutting commercial uses. The
proposal is by strip commercial on both the south and west side of the site. To the west, the strip
commercial building abuts the property line; at this location there is no possibility to create a
connection without removing a building or a portion of a building. To the south, the connection
would be possible, as it would access a parking lot. The applicant has not proposed any site to site
vehicle access ways. As such, staff recommends a condition of approval that either a site-to-site
vehicle access is provided between the subject site and the south CA zone property or applies for and
is granted a variance from the above standards.
Critical Areas: The project is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2 and proposes to store
hazardous materials on site. As such, the project will be subject to additional requirements under
RMC 4-3-0SOH.2.d, which may include but is not limited to secondary containment, hazardous
material monitoring, emergency collection devices, inspection of containment and emergency
equipment, and employee training. Therefore the applicant shall provide documentation at building
permit application verifying compliance with RMC 4-3-0SOH.2.d; which shall be reviewed and
approved by the Fire Department, Water Utility and the Current Planning Project Manager.
Parking: Drive-through facilities shall be so located that sufficient on-site vehicle stacking space is
provided for the handling of motor vehicles using such facility during peak business hours. Typically 5
stacking spaces per window are required unless otherwise determined by the Planning Director.
Stacking spaces cannot obstruct required parking spaces or ingress/egress within the site or extend
into the public right-of-way.
One parking space would be required for the cashier's kiosk.
The applicant provided one parking space, however this parking space has been labeled for ADA. The
parking space is intended to be available for the cashier working at the kiosk. If this employee does
£RC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Department of Community
QFC FUEL CENTER #871
Report of November 19, 2012
nomic Development Environmental R Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report
WAll-083, SA-A, ECF
Page 12 of 31
not have an ADA parking permit they would not be able to use the provided parking stall. As such,
staff recommends that the parking stall be designed to ADA dimensions to allow for its use to
accommodate individuals with the need for ADA size stall however to not label the stall limiting it use
so that is can provide parking for the cashier at the kiosk with or without an ADA parking permit. The
parking stall should also be signed "employee parking" to ensure the space if available for the
employee. With this change, the project would provide parking for the employee of the gas station.
The applicant shall provide an updated site plan depicting the parking stall without ADA labeling for
review and approval at building permit review.
The applicant has requested a modification from the stacking standards of 5 spaces per vehicle
fueling positions. Based on the minimum standards the ten fueling positions require 5 cars stacking.
This would result in a total of 50 car stacking spaces. The applicant has requested to provide room
for 16 car staking.
The applicant submitted a modification request which was supported by a Transportation Analysis
prepared by Transportation Engineering North West. The applicant contends that they considered
multiple layouts, pump configurations, spacing/layout options and their impacts on queuing/stacking.
The most effective option is provided in the submitted plans. The proposal would provide six
stacking lanes serving 10 available vehicle fueling pumps (VFP) but would also maintain four passing
lanes, two beneath the fuel canopy and two each on the outer edge of the canopy.
The applicant has indicated that the proposed design allows drivers to maneuver to take advantage
of an unused VFP, and maintain the maximum number of VFPs available. Furthermore, the applicant
has indicated the combination of more refueling options and easier accessibility lending to decrease
dwell time would equate to less of a chance of a queuing/stacking problem developing. The
Transportation Analysis concluded that the proposed on-site queuing area is sufficient to
accommodate the expected demand. Staff supports a modification to the stacking as proposed.
Sidewalks, Pathways, and Pedestrian Easements: The applicant has proposed to provide sidewalks
along the street frontages which would allow for pedestrian circulation around the site. However,
the fuel station is an auto oriented use which continuously contains maneuvering vehicles. As such
pedestrians are discourages from walking though the site unless utilizing the facility. Therefore, the
proposed sidewalks along the frontages would meet the intent of pedestrian pathways and at the
same time would provide for safe pedestrian circulation around the site.
c. DESIGN REGULATIO.N COMPLIA/1/CEJI/Wt.CONISTENCY: The sfte is located within DesignDistrict 'D'.
To ensure that buildings are located,n felation to streets and other buildings so that theYision ofthe City
, of Renton can be rea/izedfor a high-density urban environment; so that businesses enjoy visibility from
public rights-of-way; and to encourage pedestrian activity throughout the district. As demonstrated in
the.table below the proposal meets the intent of the Design Regulations on the basis of individual merit if
afl conditions of approval are met. _ · -; _-_
i. SITE DESIGN AND BUILDING LOCATION:
Intent: To ensure that buildings are located in relation to streets and other buildings so that the Vision of
the City of Renton can be realized for a high-density urban environment; so that businesses enjoy visibility
from public rights-of-way; and to encourage pedestrian activity.
1. Building Location and Orientation:
Intent: To ensure visibility of businesses and to establish active, lively uses along sidewalks and
pedestrian pathways. To organize buildings for pedestrian use ond so that natural light is available to
other structures and open space. To ensure an appropriate transition between buildings, parking areas,
and other land uses; and increase privacy for residential uses.
Guidelines: Developments shall enhance the mutual relationship of buildings with each other, as well as
with the roods, open space, and pedestrian amenities while working to create a pedestrian oriented
environment. Lots shall be configured to encourage variety and so that natural light is available to
ERC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Deportment of Community
QFC FUEL CENTER #871
nomic Development Environmental R Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report
WAll-083, SA-A, ECF
Report of November 19, 2012 Page 13 of 31
buildings and open space. The privacy af individuals in residential uses shall be provided far.
Standard: The availability of natural light (both direct and reflected) and direct sun exposure
,t' to nearby buildings and open space (except parking areas) shall be considered when siting
structures.
Standard: Buildings shall be oriented ta the street with clear connections to the sidewalk.
,t' Staff Comment: The project does not contain any traditional buildings to be oriented to the
street. Landscape screening is proposed along the frontage to provide a visual "distraction"
to the proposed vehicular related use and it associated structure.
Standard: Buildings with residential uses located at the street level shall be set back from the
N/A sidewalk a minimum of ten feet (10'} and feature substantial landscaping between the
sidewalk and the building or have the ground floor residential uses raised above street level
for residents privacy.
2. Building Entries:
Intent: To make building entrances convenient to locate and easy to access, and ensure that building
entries further the pedestrian nature of the fronting sidewalk and the urban character of the district.
Guidelines: Primary entries shall face the street, serve as a focal point, and allow space far social
interaction. All entries shall include features that make them easily identifiable while reflecting the
architectural character of the building. The primary entry shall be the most visually prominent entry.
Pedestrian access to the building from the sidewalk, parking lots, and/ar other areas shall be provided
and shall enhance the overall quality of the pedestrian experience on the site.
N/A
Standard: A primary entrance of each building shall be located on the facade facing a street,
shall be prominent, visible from the street, connected by a walkway to the public sidewalk,
and include human-scale elements.
N/a
Standard: A primary entrance of each building shall be made visibly prominent by
incorporating architectural features such as a facade overhang, trellis, large entry doors,
and/or ornamental lighting.
Standard Building entries from a street shall be clearly marked with canopies, architectural
N/A
elements, ornamental lighting, or landscaping and include weather protection at least four
and one-half feet (4-1/2') wide (illustration below). Buildings that are taller than thirty feet
(30') in height shall also ensure that the weather protection is proportional to the distance
above ground level.
N/A Standard: Building entries from a parking lot shall be subordinate ta those related to the
street.
Standard: Features such as entries, lobbies, and display windows shall be oriented to a street
N/A or pedestrian-oriented space; otherwise, screening or decorative features should be
incorporated.
N/A
Standard: Multiple buildings on the same site shall direct views to building entries by
providing a continuous network of pedestrian paths and open spaces that incorporate
landscaping.
N/A
Standard: Ground floor residential units that are directly accessible from the street shall
include entries from front yards to provide transition space from the street or entries from an
open space such as a courtyard or garden that is accessible from the street.
3. Transition to Surrounding Development:
Intent: To shape redevelopment projects so that the character and value of Rentan's long-established,
existing neighborhoods are preserved.
Guidelines: Careful siting and design treatment shall be used ta achieve a compatible transition where
new buildings differ from surrounding development in terms of building height, bulk and scale.
,t'
Standard: At least one of the following design elements shall be considered to promote a
transition to surrounding uses:
(o) Building proportions, including step-backs on upper levels;
ERC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Department of Community · nomic Development Environmental R Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report
LUAlZ--083, SA-A, ECF QFC FUEL CENTER #871
Report of November 19, 2012 Page 14 of 31
(b) Building articulation to divide a larger architectural element into smaller
increments; or
(c) Roof lines, roof pitches, and roof shapes designed to reduce apparent bulk and
transition with existing development.
Additionally, the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic
Development or designee may require increased setbacks at the side or rear of a
building in order to reduce the bulk and scale of larger buildings and/or so that sunlight
reaches adjacent and/or abutting yards.
4. Service Element Location and Design:
Intent: To reduce the potential negative impacts of service elements (i.e., waste receptacles, loading
docks} by locating service and loading areas away from high-volume pedestrian areas, and screening
them from view in high visibility areas.
Guidelines: Service elements shall be concentrated and located so that impacts to pedestrians and other
abutting uses ore minimized. The impacts of service elements shall be mitigated with landscaping and an
enclosure with fencing that is made of quality materials.
Standard: Service elements shall be located and designed ta minimize the impacts an the
,/ pedestrian environment and adjacent uses. Service elements shall be concentrated and
located where they ore accessible to service vehicles and convenient for tenant use.
Standard: In addition to standard enclosure requirements, garbage, recycling collection, and
utility areas shall be enclosed on all sides, including the roof and screened around their
perimeter by o wall or fence and hove self-closing doors.
Staff Comment: The applicant's submittals for the refuse and recyclable enclosure
Not elevations do not depict a roof. However, the updated site plan that was provided in the
Compliant October e-mail (Exhibit 4), identified that the trash enclosure would be "covered 11
•
Therefore, staff recommends as a condition of approval, the applicant be required to submit
revised elevations for the refuse and recyclable enclosure depicting a roof. The revised
elevations shall be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager
prior to building permit approval.
,/ Standard: Service enclosures shall be mode of masonry, ornamental metal or wood, or some
combination of the three (3).
N/A Standard: If the service area is adjacent too street, pathway, ar pedestrian-oriented space, a
landscaped planting strip, minimum 3 feet wide, shall be located an 3 sides of such facility.
S. Gateways:
Not Applicable
ii. PARKING AND VEHICULAR ACCESS:
Intent: Ta provide safe, convenient access to the Urban Center and the Center Village; incorporate various
modes of transportation, including public mass transit, in order to reduce traffic volumes and other
impacts from vehicles; ensure sufficient parking is provided, while encouraging creativity in reducing the
impacts of parking areas; allow an active pedestrian environment by maintaining contiguous street
frontages, without parking lot siting along sidewalks and building facades; minimize the visual impact of
parking lots; and use access streets and parking to maintain an urban edge to the district.
1. Surface Parking:
Intent: To maintain active pedestrian environments along streets by placing parking lots primarily in back
of buildings.
Guidelines: Surface parking shall be located and designed so as to reduce the visual impact of the parking
area and associated vehicles. Large areas af surface parking shall also be designed to accommodate
future infill development.
Standard: Parking shall be located so that no surface parking is located between a building
,/ and the front property line, or the building and side property line, on the street side of a
corner lot.
ERC/Site Pion Report
City of Renton Department of Community -nomic Development Environmental R · Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report
WA12-083, SA-A, ECF QFC FUEL CENTER #871
Report of November 19, 2012 Page 15 of 31
./ Standard: Parking shall be located so that it is screened from surrounding streets by
buildings, landscaping, and/or gateway features as dictated by location.
2. Structured Parking Garages:
Intent: To promote more efficient use of land needed for vehicle parking; encourage the use of structured
parking; physically and visually integrate parking garages with other uses; and reduce the overall impact
of parking garages.
Guidelines: Parking garages shall not dominate the streetscape; they shall be designed to be
complementary with adjacent and abutting buildings. They shall be sited to complement, not
subordinate, pedestrian entries. Similar forms, materials, and/or details to the primary building{s) should
be used to enhance garages.
N/A Standard: Parking structures shall provide space for ground floor commercial uses along
street frontages at a minimum of seventy five percent {75%} of the building frontage width.
Standard: The entire facade must feature a pedestrian-oriented facade. The Administrator of
the Department of Community and Economic Development may approve parking structures
that do not feature a pedestrian orientation in limited circumstances. If allowed, the
N/A structure shall be set back at least six feet {6') from the sidewalk and feature substantial
landscaping. This landscaping shall include a cambination of evergreen and deciduous trees,
shrubs, and ground caver. This setback shall be increased to ten feet {10'} when abutting a
primary arterial and/or minor arterial.
N/A Standard: Public facing facades shall be articulated by arches, lintels, masonry trim, or other
architectural elements and/or materials.
N/A Standard: The entry to the parking garage shall be located away from the primary street, to
either the side or rear of the building.
Standard: Parking garages at grade shall include screening or be enclosed from view with
N/A treatment such as walls, decorative grilles, trellis with landscaping, ar a combination of
treatments.
Standard: The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development
or designee may allow a reduced setback where the applicant can successfully demonstrate
that the landscaped area and/or other design treatment meets the intent of these standards
and guidelines. Possible treatments to reduce the setback include landscaping components
plus one or more of the following integrated with the architectural design of the building:
{a) Ornamental grillwork {other than vertical bars);
N/A {b} Decorative artwork;
{c) Display windows;
{d} Brick, tile, or stone;
{e) Pre-cast decorative panels;
(f) Vine-covered trellis;
{g) Raised landscaping beds with decorative materials; or
{h)Other treatments that meet the intent of this standard.
3. Vehicular Access:
Intent: To maintain a contiguous and uninterrupted sidewalk by minimizing, consolidating, and/or
eliminating vehicular access off streets.
Guidelines: Vehicular access to parking garages and parking lots shall not impede or interrupt pedestrian
mobility. The impacts of curb cuts to pedestrian access on sidewalks shall be minimized.
N/A Standard: Access to parking lots and garages shall be from alleys, when available. If not
available, access shall occur at side streets.
./ Standard: The number of driveways and curb cuts shall be minimized, so that pedestrian
circulation along the sidewalk is minimally impeded.
ERC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Department of Camm unity &
QFC FUEL CENTER #871
omic Devdopmen t Environmental Re · Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report
WAll-083, SA-A, ECF
Report of November 19, 2012 Page 16 of 31
iii. PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT:
Intent: To enhance the urban character of development in the Urban Center and the Center Village by
creating pedestrian networks and by praviding strong links from streets and drives ta building entrances;
make the pedestrian environment safer and more convenient, comfortable, and pleasant ta walk
between businesses, on sidewalks, to and from access points, and through parking lots; and promote the
use of multi-modal and public transportation systems in order to reduce other vehicular traffic.
1-Pedestrian Circulation:
Intent: To create a network of linkages for pedestrians to improve safety and convenience and enhance
the pedestrian environment.
Guidelines: The pedestrian environment shall be given priority and importance in the design of projects.
Sidewalks and/or pathways shall be provided and shall provide safe access to buildings from parking
areas. Providing pedestrian connections to abutting properties is an important aspect of connectivity and
encourages pedestrian activity and shall be considered. Pathways shall be easily identifiable to
pedestrians and drivers.
Standard: A pedestrian circulation system of pathways that are clearly delineated and
connect buildings, open space, and parking areas with the sidewalk system and abutting
properties shall be provided.
(a) Pathways shall be located so that there are clear sight lines, to increase safety.
(b) Pathways shall be an a/I-weather or permeable walking surface, unless the .,,. applicant can demonstrate that the proposed surface is appropriate for the
anticipated number of users and complementary to the design of the development.
Staff Comment: Pedestrian access through the maneuvering area of a fuel station is
discouraged for pedestrian safety. Pedestrian circulation is designed to move around the
edge of the site along the sidewalks. There is separation from the vehicular oriented area
via on-site landscaped area to provide separation and screening.
Standard: Pathways within parking areas shall be provided and differentiated by material or
N/A texture (i.e., raised walkway, stamped concrete, or pavers) from abutting paving materials.
Permeable materials are encouraged. The pathways shall be perpendicular to the applicable
building facade and no greater than ane hundred fifty feet (150') apart.
Standard: Sidewalks and pathways alang the facades of buildings shall be of sufficient width
to accommodate anticipated numbers of users. Specifically:
(a) Sidewalks and pathways along the facades of mixed use and retail buildings 100
or more feet in width (measured along the facade) shall provide sidewalks at least 12
feet in width. The walkway shall include an 8 foot minimum unobstructed walking
surface.
N/A (b) Interior pathways shall be provided and shall vary in width to establish a
hierarchy. The widths shall be based on the intended number of users; to be no
smaller than five feet (5') and no greater than twelve feet (12').
(c) For all other interior pathways, the proposed walkway shall be af sufficient width
to accommodate the anticipated number of users.
Staff Comment: No pathways are located along the fuel canopy facades. Pedestrian paths
are delineated beneath the canopy to provide for customer safety as they approach the
kiosk.
N/A Standard: Mid-block connections between buildings shall be provided.
3. Pedestrian Amenities:
Intent: To create attractive spaces that unify the building and street environments and are inviting and
comfortable for pedestrians; and provide publicly accessible areas that function for a variety of activities,
at all times of the year, and under typical seasonal weather conditions.
Guidelines: The pedestrian environment shall be given priarity and importance in the design of projects.
ERC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Deportment of Community
QFC FUEL CENTER #871
nomic Development Environmental Re Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report
WAll-083, SA-A, ECF
Report of November 19, 2012 Page 17 of 31
Amenities that encourage pedestrian use and enhance the pedestrian experience shall be included.
Standard: Architectural elements that incorporate plants, particularly at building entrances,
in publicly accessible spaces and at facades along streets, shall be provided.
Staff Comment: The applicant has not proposed architectural elements along the building's
facade incorporating plants (Exhibit 4). However, the applicant has partially achieved an
,/ attractive space that unifies the building and the street through an increase in the setback to
accommodate a pedestrian plaza area abutting the structure. However, the applicant has
not proposed pedestrian amenities or plantings within the proposed plaza area (Exhibit 2).
Therefore, staff recommends as a condition of approval the applicant revise the site plan to
depict pedestrian amenities, along with plantings, within the pedestrian plaza area. The
revised site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Project
Manager prior to building permit approval.
Standard: Amenities such as outdoor group seating, benches, transit shelters, fountains, ond
public art shall be provided.
(o) Site furniture shall be mode of durable, vondol-ond weather-resistant materials
,/ that do not retain rainwater and can be reasonably maintained over on extended
period of time.
{b) Site furniture and amenities shall not impede or block pedestrian access to public
spaces or building entrances.
Standard: Pedestrian overhead weather protection in the form of awnings, marquees,
,/
canopies, or building overhangs shall be provided. These elements shall be a minimum of 4.5
feet wide along at least seventy 75 percent of the length of the building facade facing the
street, a maximum height of 15 feet above the ground elevation, and no lower than 8 feet
above ground level.
iv. RECREATION AREAS AND COMMON OPEN SPACE:
Intent: To ensure that areas for both passive and active recreation are available to residents, workers,
and visitors and that these areas ore of sufficient size for the intended activity and in convenient
locations. To create usable and inviting open space that is accessible to the public; and to promote
pedestrian activity on streets particularly at street corners.
Guidelines: Developments located ot street intersections should provide pedestrian-oriented space at the
street earner to emphasize pedestrian activity /illustration below). Recreation and common open space
areas are integral aspects of quality development that encourage pedestrians and users. These areas
shall be provided in an amount that is adequate to be functional and usable; they shall also be
landscaped and located so that they ore appealing to users and pedestrians
N/A Standard: All mixed use residential and attached housing developments of ten /10) or more
dwelling units shall provide common opens space and/or recreation areas.
N/A Standard: Amount of common space or recreation area to be provided: at minimum fifty /50)
square feet per unit.
Standard: The location, layout, and proposed type of common space or recreation area shall
N/A be subject to approval by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic
Development or designee.
Standard: At least one of the following shall be provided in each open space and/or
recreation area (the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic
Development or designee may require more than one of the following elements for
N/A developments having more than one hundred /100) units):
(o) Courtyards, plazas, or multi-purpose open spaces;
{b) Upper level common decks, patios, terraces, or roof gardens/pea-patches. Such
spaces above the street level must feature views or amenities that ore unique to
£RC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Department of Community
QFC FUEL CENTER #871
nomic Development Environmental R · Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report
WA12-083, SA-A, ECF
Report of November 19, 2012 Page 18 of 31
--
the site and are provided as an asset to the development;
(c) Pedestrian corridors dedicated ta passive recreation and separate from the
public street system;
(d) Recreation facilities including, but not limited ta, tennis/sports courts, swimming
pools, exercise areas, game rooms, or other similar facilities; or
(e) Children's play spaces that are centrally located near a majority of dwelling units
and visible from surrounding units. They shall also be located away from
hazardous areas such as garbage dumpsters, drainage facilities, and parking
areas.
Standard: All buildings and developments with aver thirty thousand {30,000} square feet af
N/A nonresidential uses (excludes parking garage flaorplate areas) shall provide pedestrian-
oriented space.
Standard: The pedestrian-oriented space for buildings and developments with over thirty
thousand (30,000) square feet of nonresidential uses shall include all of the fa/lawing:
(a) Visual and pedestrian access (including barrier-free access) to the abutting
structures from the public right-of-way or a nan vehicular courtyard; and
N/A (b) Paved walking surfaces of either concrete or approved unit paving; and
(c) On-site or building-mounted lighting providing at least four (4) foot-candles
(average) on the ground; and
{d) At least three (3) lineal feet of seating area (bench, ledge, etc.) or one individual
seat per sixty {60) square feet of plaza area or open space.
Standard: The following areas shall not count as pedestrian-oriented space for buildings and
developments with over thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of nonresidential uses:
(a) The minimum required walkway. However, where walkways are widened ar
enhanced beyond minimum requirements, the area may count as pedestrian-
N/A oriented space if the Administrator of the Department of Community and
Economic Development ar designee determines such space meets the definition
of pedestrian-oriented space.
{b} Areas that abut landscaped parking lots, chain link fences, blank walls, and/or
dumpsters or service areas. ., Standard: Outdoor storage (shopping carts, potting sail bags, firewood, etc.) is prohibited
within pedestrian-oriented space.
Minimum Standard: Commercial Arterial Zane Public Plazas.
At each corner of the intersections listed be/aw, there shall be provision of a public plaza of
no less than 1,000 square feet with a minimum dimension of 20 feet on one side abutting the
sidewalk. The public plaza must be landscaped consistent with RMC 4-4-070, including at
minimum street trees, decorative paving, pedestrian-scaled lighting, and seating.
Staff Comment: The applicant has proposed a 1,099 square foot plaza area included 145
Partial square feet of plaza planting at the intersection, in the e-mail provided updated landscape
Compliance plan. However the plan did not identify if 20 feet of the plaza was on one side of the
abutting sidewalk area. It appears to comply with the 20-foot standard however staff could
not verify compliance. The plaza also contains ballads, lighting, and two benches. The
applicant has indicated that plaza paving would be provided in the plaza area. The applicant
shall provide an updated site plan identifying compliance with eh 20-foot minimum
standard. This shall be reviewed and approved by the Current Planning Manager prior to
building permit issuance.
v. BUILDING ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN:
Intent: Ta encourage building design that is unique and urban in character, comfortable an a human
scale, and uses appropriate building materials that are suitable far the Pacific Northwest climate. To
discourage franchise retail architecture.
ERC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Department of Community
QFC FUEL CENTER 11871
nomic Development Environmental R Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report
LUA12-083, SA-A, ECF
Report of November 19, 2012 Page 19 of 31
Staff Comment: The proposed fueling station is comprised of a canopy to cover the fuel pumps, which is
required by pollution prevention and stormwater regulations and a small kiosk building. The subject use
is permitted out right in the zone but does not contain buildings to address the specific standards
identified in the Building and Architectural Design section of the Design District. Therefore, staff has
coordinated with the applicant to provide a fuel station design which meets the intent of this portion of
the Design District by providing a unique design which is appropriate and suitable for the Pacific
Northwest and is unique from the franchise retail architecture of the standard QFC fuel station. The
proposed design has added a mansard roof atop the canopy to add architectural style beyond the
standard canopy. Additionally, the applicant is proposed to wrap the support poles with CMU block to
add additional detailing. Furthermore, the standard color scheme used has been adjusted to utilize a
muted tone which would consist of natural colors over the original red and blue striping. The
combination of the above adjustments meet the intent of the Building and Architectural Design
standards however, the final drawings were never provided to staff. In concept the proposed elevations
would meet the intent, however staff recommends as a condition of approval that final color elevations
and materials are provide the Current Planning Project Manager for review and approval prior to building
permit issuance. Detailing such as ruff details and material types should be provided with the updated
submittal.
1. Building Character and Massing:
Intent: To ensure that buildings are not bland and visually appear ta be at a human scale; and ensure
that all sides af a building, that can be seen by the public, are visually interesting.
Guidelines: Building facades shall be modulated and/or articulated to reduce the apparent size af
buildings, break up long blank walls, odd visual interest, and enhance the character of the neighborhood.
Articulation, modulation, and their intervals should create a sense of scale important to residential
buildings.
See Intent
above
See Intent
above
N/A
Standard: All building facades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no
mare than forty feet (40').
Staff Comment: The applicant has not proposed modulation along the building's eastern and
southern fac;ades (Exhibit 4). The, applicant has partially met the intent of this standard to
achieve visual interest along the southern fac;ade with the use of landscaping. However,
the eastern blank wall along the eastern street fac;ade is partially buffered by landscaping
due to the proposed drive aisle (Exhibit 3). The public sidewalk immediately abuts the drive
thru lane with no separation between pedestrians and vehicles. Additionally, the applicant
has not proposed a variety of vegetation within the 8-foot planter located within the right-
of-way. The use of continued and variety of vegetation along the property edge and within
the 8-foot planter would create human scale, add visual interest along the blank fac;ade and
create a safe separation between vehicles and pedestrians. Therefore, staff recommends as
a condition of approval, the applicant submit a revised landscape plan depicting a vegetated
buffer east of the drive-thru lane for its full length and trees and shrubs within the 8-foot
planter along Anacortes Ave NE. The revised landscape plan shall be submitted to and
approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval.
Standard: Modulations shall be a minimum af two feet (2') deep, sixteen feet (16'} in height,
and eight feet (8') in width.
Standard: Buildings greater than one hundred sixty feet (160') in length shall provide a
variety of modulations and articulations to reduce the apparent bulk and scale of the facade;
or provide an additional special feature such as a clock tower, courtyard, fountain, or public
gathering area.
2. Ground-Leve/ Details:
Intent: To ensure that buildings are visually interesting and reinforce the intended human-scale character
af the pedestrian environment; and ensure that all sides of a building within near or distant public view
ERC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Department of Community
QFC FUEL CENTER #871
omic Development Environmental R" Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report
WAlZ-083, SA-A, ECF
Report of November 19, 2012 Page 20 of 31
have visual interest.
Guidelines: The use of material variations such as colors, brick, shingles, stucco, and horizontal wood
siding is encouraged. The primary building entrance should be made visibly prominent by incorporating
architectural features such as a facade overhang, trellis, large entry doors, and/or ornamental lighting
{illustration below). Detail features should also be used, to include things such as decorative entry paving,
street furniture (benches, etc.), ond/or public art.
Standard: Human-scaled elements such as a lighting fixture, trellis, or other landscape
feature shall be provided along the facade's ground floor.
Doesn't depict human scaled elements.
Staff Comment: The applicant has not proposed human-scaled elements such as lighting
fixtures, trellises, or other landscape features along the building's eastern and southern
See Intent fa~ades (Exhibit 4). The condition above, for a vegetated buffer along the east side of the
above drive-thru lane for its full length would meet the intent of this standard for the eastern
facade. However, the primary fa~ade needs additional human scale elements in order to
reinforce a pedestrian oriented development. Ornamental lighting fixtures would create a
more prominent primary building fa~ade. Therefore, staff recommends as a condition of
approval, the applicant submit revised elevations depicting ornamental lighting fixtures
along the northern building facade. The revised elevations shall be submitted to and
approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval.
Standard: On any facade visible to the public, transparent windows and/or doors are
See Intent required to comprise at least 50 percent of the portion of the ground floor facade that is
above between 4 feet and 8 feet above ground (as measured on the true elevation).
Anacortes
Standard: Upper portions of building facades shall have clear windows with visibility into
N/A and out of the building. However, screening may be applied to provide shade and energy
efficiency. The minimum amount of light transmittance for windows shall be 50 percent.
N/A Standard: Display windows shall be designed for frequent change of merchandise, rather
than permanent displays.
N/A Standard: Where windows or storefronts occur, they must principally contain clear glazing.
N/A Standard: Tinted and dark glass, highly reflective (mirror-type) glass and film are prohibited.
Standard: Untreated blank walls visible from public streets, sidewalks, or interior pedestrian
pathways are prohibited. A wall (including building facades and retaining walls) is
considered a blank wall if:
See Intent (a) It is a ground floor wall or portion of a ground floor wall over 6 feet in height, has
above a horizontal length greater than 15 feet), and does not include a window, door,
building modulation or other architectural detailing; or
(e) Any portion of o ground floor wall has a surface area of 400 square feet or
greater and does not include 0 window, door, building modulation or other
architectural detailing.
Standard: If blank walls are required or unavoidable, blank walls shall be treated with one or
more of the following:
(a) A planting bed at least five feet in width containing trees, shrubs, evergreen
See Intent ground cover, or vines adjacent to the blank wall;
above (b) Trellis or other vine supports with evergreen climbing vines;
(c) Architectural detailing such as reveals, contrasting materials, or other special
detailing that meets the intent of this standard;
(d} Artwork, such as bas-relief sculpture, mural, or similar; or
(e) Seating area with special paving and seasonal planting.
3. Building Roof Unes:
ERC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Department of Community
QFC FUEL CENTER #871
nomic Development Environmental Re Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report
LUAlZ-083, SA-A, ECF
Report of November 19, 2012 Page 21 of 31
Intent: To ensure that roof forms provide distinctive profiles and interest consistent with an urban project
and contribute to the visual continuity of the district.
Guidelines: Building roof lines shall be varied and include architectural elements to add visual interest to
the building.
Standard: Buildings shall use at least one of the following elements to create varied and
interesting roof profiles:
(a) Extended parapets;
(b} Feature elements projecting above parapets; .,,
(c) Projected cornices;
(d} Pitched or sloped roofs
(e) Buildings containing predominantly residential uses shall have pitched roofs with
a minimum slope of one to four (1:4} and shall have dormers or interesting roof
forms that break up the massiveness of an uninterrupted sloping roof.
4. Building Materials:
Intent: To ensure high standards of quality and effective maintenance over time; encourage the use of
materials that reduce the visual bulk of large buildings; and encourage the use of materials that add
visual interest ta the neighborhood.
Guidelines: Building materials are an important and integral part of the architectural design of a building
that is attractive and of high quality. Material variation shall be used to create visual appeal and
eliminate monotony of facades. This shall occur on all facades in o consistent manner. High quality
materials shall be used. If materials like concrete or block walls are used they shall be enhanced to create
variation and enhance their visual appeal.
See Intent Standard: All sides of buildings visible from a street, pathway, parking area, or open space
above shall be finished on all sides with the same building materials, detailing, and color scheme, or
if different, with materials of the same quality.
See Intent Standard: All buildings shall use material variations such as colors, brick or metal banding,
above patterns or textural changes.
See Intent Standard: Materials shall be durable, high quality, and consistent with more traditional
above urban development, such as brick, integrally colored concrete masonry, pre-finished metal,
stone, steel, glass and cast-in-place concrete.
See Intent Standard: If concrete is used, walls shall be enhanced by techniques such as texturing,
above reveals, and/or coloring with a concrete coating or admixture.
Standard: If concrete block walls are used, they shall be enhanced with integral color,
See Intent textured blocks and colored mortar, decorative bond pattern and/or shall incorporate other
above masonry material
Staff Comment: It appears that concrete block is what is being proposed for the center
columns. As such, the block should be textured or colored as required above.
See Intent Standard: All buildings shall use material variations such as colors, brick or metal banding,
above patterns, or textural changes.
vi. SIGNAGE:
Intent: To provide o means of identifying and advertising businesses; provide directional assistance;
encourage signs that are both clear and of oppropriote scale for the project; encourage quality signoge
that contributes to the character of the Urban Center and the Center Village; and create color and
interest.
Guidelines: Front-lit, ground-mounted monument signs ore the preferred type of freestanding sign. Blade
type signs, proportional to the building facade on which they are maunted, are encouraged on
pedestrian-oriented streets. Alteration of trademarks notwithstanding, corporate signage should not be
garish in color nor overly lit, although creative design, strong accent colors, and interesting surface
materials and lighting techniques are encouraged.
£RC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Deportment of Community & riomic Development Environmental Re · ·ommittee & Administrative Site Pion Report
QFC FUEL CENTER #871 LUA12-083, SA-A, ECF
Report of November 19, 2012 Page 22 of 31
Standard: Entry signs shall be limited ta the name of the larger development.
unknown Staff Comment: The applicant did not provide entry sign design for review with the
application. Compliance would be reviewed at sign permit application.
Standard: Corporate logos and signs shall be sized appropriately for their location.
Staff Comment: The price sign located on the canopy is oversized and detracts from the
detailing provided to enhance the visual appearance of the structure. As such, staff
Not recommends a condition of approval that the price sign located on the canopy either be
Compliant eliminated and/or re-designed in a way that is compatible with the overall development. As
such, staff recommends a condition of approval that the applicant provide a comprehensive
sign package which provides compatibility with the proposed development and is
appropriate for the location.
N/A Standard: In mixed use and multi-use buildings, signage shall be coordinated with the overall
building design.
unknown Standard: Freestanding ground-related monument signs, with the exception of primary entry
signs, shall be limited ta five feet (5') above finished grade, including support structure.
Standard: Freestanding signs shall include decorative landscaping (ground cover and/or
../ shrubs} ta provide seasonal interest in the area surrounding the sign. Alternately, signage
may incorporate stone, brick, or other decorative materials as approved by the Director.
Standard: All of the following are prohibited:
a. Pole signs;
b. Roof signs; and
c. Back-lit signs with letters or graphics on a plastic sheet (can signs or illuminated
cabinet signs). Exceptions: Back-lit logo signs less than ten (10) squore feet are
permitted as area signs with only the individual letters back-lit (see illustration,
Not subsection GB of this Section).
Compliant Staff Comment: The sign package submitted with the Site Plan materials provided details for
directional signage and did not include details for any wall signage (Exhibit 5). It appears,
the applicant intends to use back lit cabinet directional signage which is prohibited.
Therefore, staff recommends the applicant submit a revised comprehensive signage
package which eliminates the use of back lit cabinet signage. The revised signage package
shall be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Manager prior to sign permit
approval.
vii. LIGHTING:
Intent: To ensure safety and security; provide adequate lighting levels in pedestrian areas such as plazas,
pedestrian walkways, parking areas, building entries, and other public places; and increase the visual
attractiveness of the area at all times of the day and night.
Guidelines: Lighting that improves pedestrian safety and also that creates visual interest in the building
and site during the evening hours shall be provided.
Standard: Pedestrian-scale lighting shall be provided at primary and secondary building
entrances. Examples include sconces on building facades, awnings with down-lighting and
decorative street lighting,
Not Staff Comment: A lighting plan was not provided with the application; therefore staff
Compliant recommends a condition of approval that lighting plan be provided that complies the Design
District standards. Fuel stations typically are lit, however in some cases the lighting can be
over intense resulting in compatibility issues with the surrounding development. The
applicant shall also provide a lighting plan that identifies compliance with light trespassing
standards.
Not Standard: Corporate logos and signs shall be sized appropriately for their location.
Compliant Staff Comment: See lighting comment and condition above
Not Standard: Accent lighting shall also be provided on building facades (such as sconces} and/or
ERC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Department of Community
QFC FUEL CENTER #871
Report of November 19, 2012
nomic Development Environmental Re Committee & Administrative Site Pion Report
WAll-083, SA-A, ECF
Page 23 of 31
Compliant to illuminate other key elements of the site such as gateways, specimen trees, other
significant landscaping, water features, and/or artwork.
Staff Comment: See lighting comment and condition above
Standard: Downlighting shall be used in all cases to assure safe pedestrian and vehicular
movement, unless alternative pedestrian scale lighting has been approved administratively
Not or is specifically listed as exempt from provisions located in RMC 4-4-075. Lighting, Exterior
Compliant On-Site (i.e., signoge, governmental flags, temporary holiday or decorative lighting, right-of-
way-lighting, etc.).
Staff Comment: See lighting comment and condition above
d. PLANNED ACTION ORDINANCE AND DEVELOPME_NT AGREEMENT COMPLIANCE ANO CONISTENCY:
Not applicable. ;:-. . ..
e. OFF SITE IMPACTS: .. . · . .
••••
Structures: Restricting overscale structures and overconcentration of development on a particular
portion of the site.
The single structure is located in the middle of the site. The addition of a fuel service center would
not result in an over concentration of the use in the area.
Circulation: Providing desirable transitions and linkages between uses~ streets, walkways and
adjacent properties.
Pedestrian access through maneuvering areas of a fuel station is discouraged. As such, the
pedestrian connections and linkages are provided via the required street frontage improvements and
sidewalks. The sidewalks would connect to the properties to the south along Duvall Avenue NE and
to the west along NE 4'" Street.
Loading and Storage Areas: Locating, designing and screening storage oreos, utilities, rooftop
equipment, loading oreos, and refuse and recyclables to minimize views from surrounding properties.
The refuse and recycling area has been designed to provide a block wall for screening, with
landscaping along the edge that abuts the neighboring property to the west. The Utility generator is
proposed to be screened with a fence; however a detail of this screening was not provided with the
application. The overall development would be screened via the landscaping required along the site
frontage and along the bordering property lines. As such, staff recommends a condition of approval
that the applicant provide a detail of all utility screening for both the generator and roof mounted
equipment that may be located on the canopy and/or kiosk structure.
Views: Recognizing the public benefit and desirability of maintaining visual accessibility to attractive
natural features.
There are no large attractive natural features on ·or near the site for which to maintain visual
accessibility. The applicant has proposed to limit the height of the proposed structure to below 19
feet which mitigate view impacts from surrounding properties. The applicant is proposing a
landscape buffer along the western and southern property lines to buffer the use from abutting
properties and a screening wall located in the frontage landscape strip along NE 4'h and Duvall
Avenue NE.
Landscaping: Using landscaping ta provide transitions between development and surrounding
properties to reduce noise and glare, maintain privacy, and generally enhance the appearance of the
project.
See Landscaping discussion under Findings Section 15.b.
Lighting: Designing and/or placing exterior lighting and glazing in order to avoid excessive brightness
ERC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Department of Community
QFC FUEl CENTER #871
Report of November 19, 2012
nomic Development
or glare to adjacent properties and streets
Environmental Re · , Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report
WAll-083, SA-A, ECF
Page 24 of 31
See Lighting discussion under Findings Section 15.C.vii Lighting
f. ON-SITE IMPACTS: ·.
Structure Placement: Provisions for privacy and noise reduction by building placement, spacing and
orientation.
The proposed fuel canopy has been placed on the site to accommodate the intended purpose of
vehicle fueling. The site design and layout has been optimized to facilitate function and reduce
potential queuing delays and at the same time screen the vehicular oriented use from the public
realm by providing for landscape screening between the public sidewalk and pedestrian plaza area
and the development itself. The cashers kiosk is centrally located which would allow for safe
pedestrian movement when filling a vehicle. The utilities appear to be screened, however staff has
recommended previously in the report that the applicant shall provide details of the screening to
ensure compatibility with the onsite uses and aesthetics of the overall site plan.
Structure Scale: Consideration of the scale of proposed structures in relation ta natural
characteristics, views and vistas, site amenities, sunlight, prevailing winds, and pedestrian and vehicle
needs.
The scale and bulk of the building is designed primarily for function and as required by pollution
prevention standards. However, the subject fuel station has provided additional amenities in the
form of a mansard roof and natural tone color pallet to reduce the overall scale of the structure and
it relation to the surrounding developments.
The proposed building is designed appropriately to allow adequate light and air circulation to the
buildings and the site. The design of the structures would not result in excessive shading of the
property. In addition, there is ample area surrounding the building to provide normal airflow.
Natural Features: Protection of the natural landscape by retaining existing vegetation and soils, using
topography to reduce undue cutting and filling, and limiting impervious surfaces.
The site contains 20 trees of which all are proposed for removal. The applicant has indicated that 4
trees would be considered to be dead, diseased or dangerous. However, the applicant did not
provide an arborist report to support this conclusion in the tree retention worksheet. Renton
Municipal Code requires that 5 percent of the trees on site be retained. Of the 20 trees, 1 tree is
required to be retained at the 5 percent retention rate. Because no trees are proposed to be
retained the applicant would be required to replace the trees with a minimum of 6 new trees, a
minimum of 2-inch caliper inches in size. The provided landscape plan has identified that 23 new
trees would be planted as a part of the projects site improvements and landscaping. As proposed the
applicant would comply with the tree retention requirements of the code.
Topographically, the site is relatively flat. A geotechnical report for the site was submitted, which
included recommendations for construction and site preparation among other items. Grading would
be necessary in order to prepare the site for the proposed improvements.
The applicant is proposing the excavation of approximately 2,800 cubic yards of on-site material,
primary for the underground fuel storage tanks. Following construction the site would have an
impervious surface cover of approximately 17,224 square feet or 90%.
Landscaping: Use of landscaping to soften the appearance of parking areas, to provide shade and
privacy where needed, to define and enhance open spaces, and generally to enhance the appearance
of the project. Landscaping also includes the design and protection of planting areas so that they are
less susceptible to damage from vehicles or pedestrian movements.
The landscaping is used to provide a transition between the proposed development and the public
ERC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Deportment of Community
QFC FUEL CENTER #871
nomic Development Environmental R Committee & Administrative Site Pion Report
LUA12-083, SA-A, ECF
Report of November 19, 2012 Page 25 of 31
right of way. The landscaping softens the appearance of the entire vehicular oriented development
and generally enhances the appearance of the project.
g. ACCESS:
Location and Consolidation: Providing access points on side streets or frontage streets rather than
directly onto arterial streets and consolidation of ingress and egress paints on the site and, when
feasible, with adjacent properties.
The site has two public street frontages, NE 4th Street and Duvall Avenue NE. The existing site
currently gains access from both streets, however there street frontage improvements do not
currently exist along either frontage. The applicant has proposed two access points, one right-in and
right-out along NE 4th Street and a second access point along Duvall Avenue NE. The two access
points would facilitate vehicular mobility throughout the site by providing for opportunities to reduce
vehicular stacking at the fuel pumps. NE 4th Street is considered an arterial and Duvall Avenue NE is a
collector street. As designed the primary access point is located off of Duvall Avenue NE, reducing
impacts to NE 4th Street.
Internal Circulation: Promoting safety and efficiency of the internal circulation system, including the
location, design and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian access points, drives, parking,
turnarounds, walkways, bike ways, and emergency access ways.
See Location and Consolidation discussion above.
Loading and Delivery: Separating loading and delivery areas from parking and pedestrian areas.
There are no dedicated loading or delivery areas proposed on site. Fuel tanks are located
underground; delivery would be required by a fuel tanker truck which pumps the fuel into the
underground tanks. Based on the provided site plan there appears to be sufficient space for delivery
of fuel.
Transit and Bicycles: Providing transit, carpools and bicycle facilities and access.
The subject development does not require parking with the exception for employee parking; as such
bicycle parking would not be required. If the subject employee rides a bike to work, they could utilize
the vehicle parking space for a bicycle parking space.
Pedestrians: Providing safe and attractive pedestrian connections between parking areas, buildings,
public sidewalks and adjacent properties.
Pedestrian access through maneuvering areas of a fuel station is discouraged. As such, the
pedestrian connections and linkages are provided via the required street frontage improvements and
sidewalks. The sidewalks would connect to the properties to the south along Duvall Avenue NE and
to the west along NE 4th Street, providing a safe and attractive pedestrian connection between
developments.
h. OPEN SPACE: Incorporating ope if SP'{Ces to serve as distinctive project focal points and to provide
adequate areas for passive and active. recreation by the occupants/users of the site.
The applicant is proposing to develop a pedestrian plaza space along the intersection on NE 4th Street
and Duvall Avenue NE that would be approximately 1,000 square feet. The space would contain
amenities such as benches and lighting. This plaza would serve as a project focal point and provide an
opportunity for pedestrians to sit and/or relax among the auto oriented development proposed. This
area would provide an opportunity for passive recreation and is separated for the primarily use of the
site adding an additional level of pedestrian safety.
i. VJEWSiWDPUSUCACCESs: V(nen<possilfl&, pf-o<,lci1hg.\ifew torrid ors to shorefine_s al@ Mt. Raitlier-, .. arid ,. " , .. ,. . . ' . . .· --.. , ' .-·,. ,., , .-. "' .,. ,. ', .. ,_ ... ,._" ... -... ' . . ·. . . . ' . : . , .. _,. ____ ,_,.._,.,.,.,.,.,., .. ,.,.,.' .--.-·. '
ERC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Department of Community
QFC FUEL CENTER #871
nomic Development Environmental R Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report
LUAll-083, SA-A, ECF
Report of November 19, 2012 Page 26 of 31
incorporating public access to shorelines. ' ·.
The proposed structure would not block view corridors to shorelines or Mt. Rainier. The public access
requirement is not applicable as the site is not adjacent to a shoreline.
j. NATURAL SYSTEMS: Arranging project elements .to protect existing natural systems where applicable.
There are no natural systems located on site.
k. SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Making available public services and facilities to accommodate the
proposed use.
Police and Fire: Fire and Police Department staff has indicated that existing facilities are adequate to
accommodate the subject proposal.
Parks and Recreation: Not Applicable
Drainage: The project is required to comply with the new City of Renton Amendments to the 2009
King County Surface Water Design Manual. A conceptual drainage plan and report stamped by a PE
was submitted with the formal application, and per the report the project is complying with the 2009
King County Surface Water Design Manual. The applicant has prosper to provide flow control in the
form of a wet/detention vault located in the southeast corner of the project site that would
discharge to the existing conveyance system along Duvall Avenue NE. The applicant has proposed to
meet the Enhanced Basic Water Quality requirements by providing 3 feet of dead storage in the
water quality and detention vault and a three-cartridge Stormfilter manhole with CSF media
downstream of the detention.
The stormwater report further identifies that the canopy covering over the fuel dispensing island as
well as routing the under-canopy drainage through an oil/water separator prior to discharging would
accommodate the project special requirements for source control.
Transportation: The site has two public street frontages, NE 4th Street and Duvall Avenue NE. The
applicant has proposed two access points, one right-in and right-out along NE 4th Street and a
second access point along Duvall Avenue NE. The two access points would facilitate vehicular
mobility throughout the site by providing for opportunities to reduce vehicular stacking at the fuel
pumps. Street improvements would be required along both NE 4th Street and Duvall Avenue NE
The provided Transportation Analysis concludes that the proposed project would not have a
significant adverse impact on the transportation system and that payment of transportation impact
fees would be adequate to mitigate the project impacts.
Schools: Not Applicable.
Water and Sewer: A majority of the existing utility infrastructure would be removed and replaced
with existing infrastructure. Per the City of Renton Fire Department, the preliminary fire flow
requirement is 1,500 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required; one within 150-feet of the proposed
building and one hydrant is required within 300-feet. The existing fire hydrants need to be per
current code with a stortz fitting if not existing. It appears adequate fire flow and fire hydrants exist
in the area.
The project would need to connect to the existing man hole in the intersection of NE 41h Street and
Duvall Avenue NE with a minimum 6-inch diameter pipe installing an inside drop connection. There
is an existing 24-inch sanitary sewer main located in NE 4'h Street.
l. PHASING: The\1pplicant is not requesting any additioti~I phasing ,request. ,, ,',, .. .. ' ', ' '
ERC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Department of Community
QFC FUEL CENTER #871
1omic Development Environmental R Committee & Administrative Site Pion Report
LUA12-083, SA-A, ECF
Report of November 19, 2012 Page 27 of 31
I. CONCLUSIONS:
1. Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the responsible
officials issue a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated.
2. The proposal complies with the Site Plan Review Criteria if all conditions of approval are met.
3. The proposal is compliant and consistent with the plans, policies, regulations and approvals.
4. Staff does not anticipate any adverse impacts on surrounding properties and uses as long as the
conditions of approval are complied with.
5. The proposed use is anticipated to be compatible with existing and future surrounding uses as
permitted in the CA zoning classification.
6. The scale, height and bulk of the proposed buildings are appropriate for the site.
7. Safe and efficient access and circulation has been provided for all users.
8. The proposed open space/plaza area serve as project focal points and provide adequate areas for
passive and recreation by the patrons of the fueling station.
9. There are adequate public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use.
10. The proposed location would not result in the detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within
the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed location is suited for the
proposed use.
11. The existing use would not result in a substantial or undue adverse effect on adjacent properties.
12. Adequate vehicle queuing and parking for the proposed use has been provided if all condition of
approval are met.
13. The proposed site plan ensures safe movement for vehicles and pedestrians and has mitigated
potential effects on the surrounding area if all conditions of approval are complied with.
14. The proposed development would not generate any long term harmful or unhealthy conditions.
Potential noise, light and glare impacts from the proposed use have been evaluated and mitigated if all
conditions of approval are complied with.
15. Landscaping has been provided in all areas not occupied by the building or paving. Additional
landscaping has been provided in order to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects
of the proposed use.
I J. DECISION:
The proposed Site Plan for QFC Fuel Center #871, File No. LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A· is approved subject to the
following conditions:
1. The applicant shall comply with the three mitigation measures issued as part of the Determination of
Non-Significance Mitigated, dated November 19, 2012
ERC/Site Plan Report
Cily of Renton Department of Community &
QFC FUEL CENTER #871
Report of November 19, 2012
omic Development Environmental Rev· Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report
LUA12-083, SA-A, ECF
Page 28 of 31
2. The applicant shall provide an updated site plan which clearly identifies compliance with setback
standards for review and approval by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit
issuance.
3. The applicant shall be required to submit a final landscape plan, including details for vertical elements,
for review and approval by the Currently Planning Project Manager prior to building permit issuance.
4. The applicant shall either provide a site-to-site vehicle access between the subject site and the south
CA zone property or apply for and receive an approval for a variance from the site-to-side vehicle
access requirement. Either a new site plan depicting site-to-site access shall be provided for review and
approval prior to building permit issuance or an approved variance shall be obtained prior to building
permit issuance.
5. The applicant shall provide documentation at building permit application verifying compliance with
RMC 4-3-0SOH.2.d; which shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department, Water Utility
Division and the Current Planning Project Manager prior to Building Permit Issuance.
6. The applicant shall provide an updated site plan depicting the parking stall without ADA labeling for
review and approval by the Building Department and the Current Planning Project Manager prior to
building permit issuance.
7. The applicant shall submit revised elevations for the refuse and recyclable enclosure depicting a roof.
The revised elevations shall be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager
prior to building permit issuance.
8. The applicant shall provide an updated site plan identifying compliance with the 20-foot minimum
standard for the public plaza space. This shall be reviewed and approved by the Current Planning
Project Manager prior to building permit issuance.
9. Final color elevations and materials shall be provided to the Current Planning Project Manager for
review and approval prior to building permit issuance. Detailing such as roof details and material types
should be provided with the updated submittal.
10. The applicant shall submit a comprehensive signage package which eliminates the use of back lit
cabinet signage and is compatible with the proposed development and is appropriate for the location.
The revised signage package shall be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Manager prior
to sign permit approval.
11. A lighting plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Current Planning Project Manager
prior to building permit issuance. The proposed lighting plan shall comply the Design District standards
and light trespassing standards.
12. The applicant shall provide a detail of all utility screening for both the generator and roof mounted
equipment that may be located on the canopy and/or kiosk structure. The screening details shall be
provided to the Current Planning Project Manager for review and approval prior to building permit
issuance.
yf~ 1/·w1z
te
ERC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Deportment of Community e wmic Development Environmental Re
QFC FUEL CENTER #871
Report of November 19, 2012
TRANSMITTED this 20" day of November 2012 to the Contact/Applicant/Owner:
Contact:
Robert McNeil/
Senior Planner
Barghausen Consulting Engineers,
Inc.
18215 72nd Avenue S
Kent, WA 98032
Owner:
c/o Hugh Stewart
Eastside Funding LLC
3933 Lake Washington Blvd NE ste:
#100
Kirkland, WA 98033
TRANSMITTED this 20th day of November 2012 to the Parties of Record:
John & Ada Sheen
320 Chelan Place NE #H2
Renton, WA 98059
TRANSMITTED this 20th day of November 2012 to the following:
Neil Watts, Development Services Director
Larry Meckling, Building Official
Kayren Kittrick, Development Services
Jennifer Henning, Current Planning
Fire Marshal
Renton Reporter
Land Use Action Appeals, Request for Reconsideration, & Expiration
Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report
LUAll-083, SA-A, ECF
Applicant:
Tim Hansen
QFC Real Estate Manager
Quality Food Centers, Inc.
10116 NE 8th Street
Bellevue, WA 98004
Page 29 of 31
The Environmental Determination and the Administrative Site Development Plan Review decisions will become
final if the decisions are not appealed within 14 days of the decision date.
Environmental Determination Appeal: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing
to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 p.m., December 7, 2012.
Administrative Site Development Plan Approval Appeal: Appeals of the administrative site development plan
review decision must be filed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 p.m, on December 7, 2012,
APPEALS: An appeal of the decision(s) must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43,21.C,075(3};
WAC 197-11-680). Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals
must be filed in writing together with the $250.00 application fee to Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055
South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained
from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7th Floor, (425) 430-6510.
RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days of the decision date, any party may request that a decision be reopened by
the Administrator (Decision-maker). The Administrator (Decision-maker) may modify his decision if material
evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was
misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator (Decision-maker)
finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period.
Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14-day appeal timeframe.
EXPIRATION: The Administrative Site Development Plan Review decision will expire two (2) years from the date
of decision. A single two (2) year extension may be requested pursuant to RMC 4-9-200.
THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE: provides that no ex pa rte (private one-on-one) communications
may occur concerning the land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial decision, but to Appeals
to the Hearing Examiner as well. All communications after the decision/approval date must be made in writing
through the Hearing Examiner. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to
know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any
violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the appeal by the Court.
£RC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Department of Community
QFC FUEL CENTER #871
Report of November 19, 2012
ADVISDRY NOTES TO APPLICANT
1 om1c Development Environmental Re Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report
LUA12-083, SA-A, ECF
Page 30 of 31
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action.
Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions.
Planning:
1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise
approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the
approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received.
2. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground
cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will
occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the
current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed
between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of
this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit.
3. Commercial, multi-family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the
hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays
shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be
permitted on Sundays.
4. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to final occupancy permits
Water:
1. The preliminary fire flow requirement is 1,500 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required
within 150 feet of the proposed building and one hydrant is required within 300 feet. Existing hydrants can be
counted toward the requirement as long as they meet current code, including 5-inch storz fittings.
2. Installation of a minimum 1" water meter with a RP in a "Hot Box" is required.
3. System Development Charges (SDCs) are based on the total number and size of any and all water meters. The SDCs
are collected as part of the construction permit.
Sewer.
1. This project will need to connect to the existing MH in the intersection of NE 4th St and Duvall Ave NE with a
minimum 6" diameter pipe installing an inside drop connection.
2. A commercial building permit will trigger a separate review.
3. Separate drains for the concrete islands are required to be connected to an oil water separator downstream in a vault
in a positive direction. A shut off valve is required to be installed.
4. This site is located in the East Renton Special Assessment District (SAD 0002). This fee is $.0973 per square foot of the
parcel of land and is required to be paid prior to issuance of a construction permit.
5. SDCs are based on the size of the domestic water meter. The SDCs are collected as part of the construction permit.
Surface Water:
1. The conceptual drainage plan and report was submitted with the formal application and is under review at this time.
The project shall comply with the City of Renton Amendments to the 2009 King County Surface Water Design.
2. The applicant's civil engineer will look in the Manual under Section 1.2.3.1, Area-Specific Flow Control Facility
Requirement. This site is located, per the Flow Control Application Map, in the Flow Control Duration Standard
(Forested Conditions).
3. Surface Water SOC fees are $0.405 per square foot of new impervious area. These fees are collected at the time a
construction permit is issued.
Transportation:
1. Per the NE 3rd/NE 4th St Corridor Plan, construction of the typical street section needs to match the existing curb on
NE 4th St. This will include two 11-foot travel lanes, a two way left hand turn lane, and a 5-foot bike Jane adjacent to
the new curb. The typical street section needs to show a 5-foot sidewalk separated from the roadway curb and
adjacent to the new property line, with a 5-foot planting strip including street trees on NE 4th St. Additional right-al-
way will be required to achieve the above.
ERC/Site Plan Report
City of Renton Department of Community
QFC FUEL CENTER 11871
nomic Development Environmental R-, Committee & Admini5trative Site Plan Report
WAll-083, SA-A, ECF
Report of November 19, 2012 Page 31 of 31
2. Per City of Renton code, all lot corners at intersections of dedicated public rights-of-way shall have a minimum radius
of 25 feet. The curb return at the intersection of the two arterials NE 4th St and Duvall Ave NE shall be R = 35.
3. The project and plans need to include the relocation of the traffic signal pole and controller, located at NE 4th St &
Duvall, as a part of this development.
4. The driveway access on NE 4th St needs to be right turn in and right turn out only, due to the close proximity to the
Duvall Ave NE intersection.
5. The Civil Plan set shall include the channelization plan (striping, buttons, arrows) on Duvall Ave NE.
6. The typical road section for Duvall Ave NE is 20-feet of pavement centerline to face of curb, a 5-foot planting strip, and
5-foot sidewalk adjacent to property line.
7. Street lighting will be required to be installed fronting the parcel being developed.
8. A fill source statement will be required for any fill imported to the site.
Fire:
1. The preliminary fire flow requirement if 1,500 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required
within 150-feet of the proposed building and one hydrant is required within 300-feet. Existing hydrants can be
counted toward the requirement as long as they meet current code, including 5-inch storz fittings. It appears
adequate fire flow and fire hydrants exist in the this area.
2. Separate plans and permits are required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for review and permitting of
all underground fuel tanks and a tank monitoring systems.
3. All new commercial fuel dispensing facilities shall be provided with an approved on site standby power system to
facilitate fuel dispensing during local power outages or disaster
4. Fire department apparatus access is adequate
5. An electronic site plan is required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for pre-fire planning purposes prior
to occupancy of the building.
General:
1. All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals, prepared according to
City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer.
2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical Control Network.
3. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of the fee must be paid upon
application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be
additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards.
ERC/Site Plan Report
m >< ::c
1-1 m
1-1
-I ....
--'-'--~----'-=; .. i;fi.,'=·· ~-.Rc.=i .• · :· r ·r 1 t"r ' .. 'J,r
--·'"'!-, """"!'""."_':._
;'"~'. '1;'
15432
EX-1
..,
.U. I ' I:
THE KROGER CO.
3800 S.E. 22ND AVENUE
PORTLAND, OREGON
·--"··:;::,~
'
Title;
NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP
QFC FUEL
SWC DUVALL AVE. & N.E. 4TH ST
RENTON, WASHINGTON
V)
0
m ~ ,., >< ~ ::c ::J
0 .... z
0, ....
-t
N
15432
EX-2
-o --~
I
For.
THE KROGER CO.
3800 S.E. 22ND AVENUE
PORTLAND, OREGON
T,t/e:
CANOPY ELEVATIO NS
QFC FUE L
SWC DU VA LL AVE. & N.E. 4TH ST
RENTON, WASHINGTON
(:J
!)) ((? ~ (ll·."" ,.:::J IJ '-L .... .::1
CD ::~OP'!" GRAPHICS
r-.·.·:.'L-c-. -.·.( ''<., t-jI'l I,.,;,, .. ,, ',,
I
''-,· .,,)i ',, r
,,, I , l
I :.L ---.L -1-. -1 ---l ..l.....=..C:r 0 .~:;s~.-GR:PHICS
rl
I
r r l ~ ~-·-=10°"·1 ___ _1·1 . 11 ,~~,, .... ..,
NORTH ELEVATION
uqo.,_l
0 SOUTH ELEVATION -DUVALL AVE
I_· ~...,,
c:·:
~J.'f~I'' :L..,, I
I
, ji
jj;
a
(i)
I---~1:,,;;;;,~:~,~2/:,"/.
~.:iu~
0
LiQ.NJ
DISPENSER ELEVATION
EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE()
""""'" '""""~"" ,)f,e,r,c,r,oo "'°' :-r::":::~::~;;;-" ,. .•. "'~'"' ,.;;;;"~--;,: ::;--
,.,,,,,.,.,,,,.,m-.c
,-, .. ,., .• _ ,~~,
'"""'""'""'
'7!'''""""''-
..".._ I.'"""~ '"'"' -cc '" ,.,..,
~::~:,:, °,'.1(~·:,' ' ~ ',~, ~:~.-o 1-~'-"' ·~=," ~
~:~:::~:;:;:~;:,;_c'_"!:7 C!"'" "·""'""'''c.,.;
'ClV""""O CO<V S~H ,,.~..c, ""~'
"-'"""''"""" •. '""" ~,--;;:·c.:;::;:;:1~»·,,,c, "'""""'
~ ,~,,u,,.,.
_,, I''""""" ~ ''"""-""""~'"'''' -"'"'
--, ~~ f<S~<<!ffi li::;,:;=A:OR
''"~.'::::":'-'"""" I""""""'"'-'" ;:.i1:::~·~,~:,;~~1~1
~
,---'. ~ .-'~~7"" I or..-""'"'"'"°'°"
"''"-"''""""'"""-""'!"'"'-""-~"
::;'''='-'""'"" : ""'"" "'"-""
_,,
_,.
'""°"' ,,,,.,,, '~" ~-••uE•
"'''""'-'·""""·,.-,, --------"'"'""'·""""''"'
~J!.IJl!.!!1!!11111~:~,
i'-il i§\ '~
::-·.·.,~~ilif~-lillUW@Wi•lli;·L; [OJ!Jl~~l:;,Jt, ' ' ') 41~ 'J r, r::-c,g r, 7, '] / '\' / )''1 / /(\'
, ·~··: I L ,_, \_, L__, 1 _) :1
p
(D ~".E's;},~~~AT10N
0
1i
l
I!!!
_,._rn"'"'"'""''"
l!!llfil:::''
'"Sl"lLRE•OlECI.NOf'"rf•SC, ""'1<0:,N1'•i;>.0,:,,-()N
mr,w, '"''"" "" '·"' PLoN """" CONt•OL '-"'LES (r,,ONOC"[C w,0>< '-'GN) 'NSO< COC.MN """
'HKUUCH (',, .' 1/,· f'YC COfl,,T r,c,. C(,<O•N
,,;ac,vr orc,,-c rn cr.ic"""' o, es-cc """ '"'""
S>JNr,:,l'1•<>LS()<00W.!CHGM',HCUC·J•NS
@)
D
. ~::%,":;,,, ""
i/:_;,~,; :i~!'"
-•,OS>
SECTION THRU KIOSK ""'' ,,,-.,-()
(_ __ I I __j
® CANOPY PRICE SIGN GRAPHICS
"'"' ,,,-.
#:f~?f}:~~;~::.;~;:1;;,
//' """':;;:".:'.:'" "
0.:S~I~~ ·-··· ".i' ,n· ,_, "" :~.~ •• y-'""' u,,
i:-11 '~.'~
' ' 7,,r'l~ :-CC· c..-01 '" ~"'-C
' . JI , :~:::: ,,,
~::::::: :::,;'"
\·_'. .-._/ :::t.'.)),"
® SECTION AT CANOPY SIGN (D) :;;:~?,~ "~~ CANOPY COLUMN
{4!.~ ~~J")
':i>,~O •MO<"t~ ..
;:~:':..'':',;:;"""""'
'"'"""'"' 1 .. ,1,;,_,,,,,,,,
'r:..'::::'i~ .. "'-:,,
; ! l ~Jji ,! i 11 l;l! ~ f: ~,,,
I
~
£
fl
!;,i~c... :~m
1ft) ! i,., ""',-// ~~{Ji:}::•
'!":
VJ w
~
I
ll!
~
I
,' ~
P,c,ocl/ ,,..,,
:":'-"! ·-· ,._...,,,
,;;;-
'"
~~-,~.,
"''"""
f"(GD) OPTION }
""" """"'»:; 'i,,,"'",t"\ ""'"" '"'~"'" '~ '"','';''(!.'-'""'""' """""' ..n,, "'""""""' '"' """""'-"''''''~''"''";"' <•o• ec•ar.c.t1to .._, •~Hrs """"') EXTEIK>A ELEV.or,T1QN9
10~ (01 / '"'1
'"-'"''""" ""-'i'i l~tr~;~~:tlr~;r~ :~:;:r:r~,/~(:!:,'~,"•1• r,w =OE
~°;"~'",':::_::-•:\1' .,to:J;:;:-~,i"<,~·,';;"'i,;,::"_;;,";',:, \~t Fl..et.JM'l FACUTY
~.,.:!';~"':,";,1~/~'/'.);,'fe.:;'.';']s":\,.'!J [,~\',~1"~ [>,S ,.....,
~'.\i~afJ~~~£~;1;&!~~f~5g;[~f?:" A2.0
~-/H,JC""-!:OOES
EXHIBIT 3
0
I
,-----------------------
'
/~ -i!
'
'
' I)
'
'
p q ! Ht:,-,:r,;~===R=EV='s'=oN=s:::r:rnvcd
" " t1--+-----------l----+---+-----l
--------------------]
Do
f
I
' -......... ~_
·~ i_•..'.. .... _;,_-~,,--=~~~-~~~l~--. -~----~-' ~--
'!!
!ii
~~,
(0"
~~~l ~ • _ Ii, '-"' ~ Qom, ..... ___ !f 11 ~,...,,1'
·--I ; Of"::;9',.-oo ~ ,~'.];;:. Et££-_ ~..WI.~:'
m >< ::c
1-1
ta
1-1
-I
0\
"O ()
ru -· 5 '<
5· 0
(Q ....
0 Jj
~-(!)
0. ::,
l!l ! ll ! I II Ii II
1111illljj!ij!
I ·11ii11!1 1i I I!'' H.
! ; ' I I I ~-
~
. .
·1 '
:~ ~. tt·.: ,. -,n ;:ii
~I
'
C)
:0
)>
0
z
C)
-u r
)> z
m >< ::c
1-f
CICI
1-f
-f ....
0 c.n
Q.
<O
~ :a s:::
0
~ z ::t>
C) m
""U r ::t> z
m >< :c ....
0:,
=I
00
~ z
~
~
CJ) m
:f: m
:IJ
)> z
0
~
:IJ
""U r
)> z
!I~ pl~
Ii
11 u 11 I Hn }.''I'! ,.uu
; j I I ii ,
. . ; ii . ···-! 1 ! .iii Id. '·"···!!!Jii Ii •i i 'ri 1
111 IL! ",· ! :1,i!I ! ! ilii.n I ,",• q. ,. I, ' ! . ' ' ,,!
1! h I h ·,· 1, ·t I! ' l, i ' ,f ! ! tl}i! ! · 'I ''l I , l • ' r' 5 !h ' 1ij! · • i! j !l ,i h I ! •! j '·1 ! f! ,i !
ii l ' ,, ' i. 1: i 1 ', F, t " • I• 'l ft • ' I• ' ' l 't iililtjiif,,J., I ii li '1 I I • i, I! l f, ! ;_ ' i' ' ' ' l '
jl 1
1
! I~· i ri1 ·J r1 ·J 1: i 1: 1: 111,ti I· !,Ii !, l r r ' · .• ' H,! I '·1 ·11,, .. I • • • I H
C')
ll -· ~~
::::,, 0
::, .... ~ JJ
-· (l) i;i ::,
-· -O O ::, ::i
REVISIONS
*o
! I
1 I ; ~
• I I
~ • ! j
' • ' ' ' • I I
!
. ~ ' ! • l . ' L
' ' !
en
C) z
"Tl
~ z
-I
-I
:0 m m
" r
~
m >< ::c
1-1
OJ
1-1
-I ....
0
(~ \. )
' -I ' ,, ~ :c
m
iil
5 en c:: ,,
m
m ;
0 z
J = ~
ffi g
V, rn
.--u. ..,
er,
~ :::
C') ,:J
"' ~ :::,
:::, 0 :::, .... (0
JJ 0 <' (I)
iii ::I
6' .....
:::, 0 ::;
!! ~
'" ,! ~' !l
~§
' j ,
I
-I ,,,
!ln :,:
m
~
5 en
C: ,,
m
en g
0 z
r,
t .... _)
iii .,,
en :c
m z
0
~ ,c::
!~
~
H"
e
'
!
j
' ' '
'
Cf:~ . -
.. J "
' "' ' .
' -I i
~ ' ' ' :,: ' m ' ' z I 0 ' ... ' 0 ' .,
' c:: ' ,, I
m
' m '
' ,r
' '!:_!
' ,,
' ,::! '
' 0 )
,Z , ,
-~
"'
OFC R.JEL CENT'EA -t871 F0ITON HKH..ANJS -0FC
Qulitr ~d C...i:n , ""-• ~ '"" ,.,.,H ......
OFC Stor,..
~~~~1.rj!_,, ""~
-----,'
' -I
i
,I
J>
"' I
m
ii
5
(/)
C
CD m
0
~ r
"'
ti
King County
Wastewab?r Treatment Divisior.
Community Services and Environmental Planning
King Street Center, KSC-NR-0505
201 South Jackson Street
Seattle, WA 98104-3855
Sent Via email: VDolbee@Rentonwa.gov
December 12, 2012
Vanessa Dolbee
Department of Community and Economic Development
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
RE: LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A
Dear Ms. Dolbee:
City of Renton
Planning Division
DEC l 3 10°11
The King County Wastewater Treatment Division has reviewed the Notice of Environmental
Determination-Mitigated (DNS-M) request for Environmental Review and Administrative Site Plat
approval; dated 11/21/2012, for the proposal to construct a QFC Fuel Center featuring a 3360 SF
canopy, a 160 SF cashier's kiosk, 20000 gallon and 18,000 gallon underground fuel storage tank
on a 22,090 SF vacant lot located in a Commercial Arterial zone designation. King County requires
that a capacity charge be applied to any project that constructs a new connection to the sewer
system, any reconnection within five years of a disconnection, or any change in use or building
remodel that includes an increase in plumbing fixtures. King County generally receives notice of
new construction; however, some sewer districts and/or the cities that represent them have
neglected to report changes in use and tenant improvements that involve an increase in plumbing
fixtures.
In an attempt to remedy this problem, we are sending this reminder to you in response to the
Environmental DNS-M review request. We ask that you forward this reminder to the sewer district
or city department responsible for Sewer Use Certification forms:
Please complete and send a Commercial Sewer Use Certification form for the above
project to the King County Capacity Charge Program in a timely manner. The form should
be sent to Ericka Stewart, Capacity Charge Program, KSC-NR-0502, at the address
above. If you need additional forms or have questions about the program, please call
Ms. Stewart at 206-684-1060.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal.
Sincerely,
Bibiana Ocheke-Ameh
Administrative Staff Assistant
Community Services and Environmental Planning
cc: Ericka Stewart, Project Manager, Capacity Charge Program
CREATING RESOURCES FROM WASTEWATER
Vanessa Dolbee
From: Cyndie L Parks
Sent:
To:
Monday, November 19, 2012 8: 17 AM
Vanessa Dolbee
Cc: Stacy Tucker
Subject: RE: LUA12-083 QFC Gas
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Vanessa -I just got the folder for the project you were referring to, sorry for the delay. I don't have any comments for it
though.
From: Vanessa Dolbee
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 06:02
To: Cyndie L Parks
Cc: Stacy Tucker
Subject: RE: LUA12-083 QFC Gas
Cyndie,
Yes this is gas station for QFC. Stacy can send you a new green folder.
Vanessa (J)of6ee
CED, x7314
From: Cyndie L Parks
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 2:30 PM
To: Vanessa Dolbee
Cc: Stacy Tucker
Subject: RE: LUA12-083 QFC Gas
The project number won't mean anything to me and I don't have any green folders at my desk pending, so I don't' know
what this is. Is this a project to install gas pumps at a QFC7?? (just judging this by the subject line .. )
C. Parks, Crime Prevention Unit
City of Renton Police Department
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057
Station: (425) 430-7521 I FAX: (425) 430-7508
----rt p"r'f [ (r 1r· 1· ttJ ,.!,..;;,,·.,,;,.,,_,_!,.#,';_.I_,_ If~
i"n!lo;'l! 011vnm<t1t
1
From: Vanessa Dolbee
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 12:55
To: Cyndie L Parks
Cc: Stacy Tucker
Subject: LUA12-083 QFC Gas
Cyndie,
It appears the green folder for the subject project may have been sent to "Parks" not Police. Does Police have any
comments on the subject project? If you would like, Stacy can send you another green folder. However, my report is
due on Thursday this week. We will need to know your comments by then.
Thank you,
'Vanessa ([)o{6ee
Senior Planner
Department of Community & Economic Development
City of Renton
Renton City Hall -6th Floor
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
425.430.7314
2
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
APPLICATION NO: LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 30, 2012
APPLICANT: Tim Hansen, QFC, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee "1-"'\1''
{ \i I 1'.
___c_P-=.:R.:::Oc:JE:::C:::T_T:_cl.:_TL:::E:.::_:Q:,_F_:C:__:_Fu:::e:.:l_:C:.:e-=.:n.:.:te:.:r_:_#:.:8_:_7.:::l _________ +-'-P-=.:R:::Oc:JE:::C:::T_:R.:.:E:.:Vc.:.l=-EW:.::::E-=.:R.:_: .:_A::_r:.:ne:::t:::a...:H.:.:e:.:n:.:.n:::in.:,ge.:e::_r __ _,.-rt.._,..._."c-'l/H,,,.r\i)
SITE AREA: 22,092 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/ A
LOCATION: 461S NE 4'" Street PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) Canopy: 3,360 SF/Kiosk 120 SF
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a
QFC Fuel Center featuring a 3,360 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot cashier's kiosk at 4615 NE 4th Street. The project
would require the installation of a 20,000 gallon underground storage for unleaded fuel, and an 18,000 gallon split underground
fuel taking divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. The vacant site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone and
is 22,092 square feet in size. A limited right-in/right-out access is proposed along NE 4th Street and full access is proposed for
Duvall Avenue NE. Approximately 2,699 square feet would be dedicated to public right of way and 2,800 cubic yards of cut and fill
activates is expected as a result of the application. There are 20 existing trees on the site, the applicant has proposed to clear the
site and replant with 20 new trees. The site is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2, no other critical areas exist on the subject
site. A stormwater study, traffic study, geotechnical report, and a critical areas reconnaissance were submitted with the
application.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code} COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housinn
Air Aesthetics
Water Urlht/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transoortation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,0DOFeet
14,000Feet
8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact
or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Ct~ I f ' I '2..
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
I
5#905
TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION FEE
Project Name:
Project Address:
Contact Person:
Permit Number:
Project Description:
Land Use Type:
D Residential
X Retail
D Non-retail
Calculation:
QFC Fuel Center #871
4615 NE 4th Street
Tim Hansen, QFC Corp
LUA12-083
3,360 SF Canopy, 10 fueling stations
Credit for 4 previously existing (removed 2007)
SUBJECT TO IMPACT FEE OR MITIGATION AT TIME
OF BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
Method of Calculation:
X ITE Trip Generation Manual, s'" Edition
X Traffic Study
X Other
ITE: (944) 168.56 PER FUELING POSITION
168.56 X 6 NEW x $75.00 = $75,852.00 (CREDITING EXISTING 4)
PER TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING NW: $31,680.00 after credits applied
PER ADOPTED IMPACT FEES (EFFECTIVE 1/1/2013): $46,662.66 with credits
Transportation
Mitigation Fee:
I
Calculated by: K.Kittrick Date: · @R: ////.>---/').Did:;:" _...;;.;;~.;.;....-----------• F I
Date of Payment:
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:
APPLICATION NO: LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A
APPLICANT: Tim Hansen, QFC, Inc.
PROJECT TITLE: QFC Fuel Center #871
SITE AREA: 22,092 square feet
LOCATION: 4615 NE 4'" Street
COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 14, 2012
DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 30, 2012
PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee
PROJECT REVIEWER: Amela Henninger
EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A
PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) Canopy: 3,360 SF/Kiosk 120 SF
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a
QFC Fuel Center featuring a 3,360 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot cashier's kiosk at 4615 NE 4th Street. The project
would require the installation of a 20,000 gallon underground storage for unleaded fuel, and an 18,000 gallon split underground
fuel taking divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. The vacant site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone and
is 22,092 square feet in size. A limited right-in/right-out access is proposed along NE 4th Street and full access is proposed for
Duvall Avenue NE. Approximately 2,699 square feet would be dedicated to public right of way and 2,800 cubic yards of cut and fill
activates is expected as a result of the application. There are 20 existing trees on the site, the applicant has proposed to clear the
site and replant with 20 new trees. The site is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2, no other critical areas exist on the subject
site. A stormwater study, traffic study, geotechnical report, and a critical areas reconnaissance were submitted with the
application.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housina
Air Aesthetics
Water Uaht/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transnnrtation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this app!icatfon with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact
or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
j L
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
M E M 0 R A N
DATE: November 13, 2012
TO: Vanessa Dolbee, Planner
FROM: Arneta Henninger, Plan Review
SUBJECT: QFC Fuel Station
4615 NE 4TH St
LUA 12-083 Parcel 1523059124
D u M
44
I have completed a preliminary review for the above-referenced proposal for the QFC fuel station,
located at the southwest corner of NE 4th St and Duvall Ave NE, all in Section 15, Township 23N, Range
SE, which proposes to construct a cashier's kiosk covering five multi-product dispensers and creating
vehicle fueling positions (project includes restrooms). The following comments are based on the pre-
application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
WATER: There is an existing 8" Cl water main located in NE 4th St (see City of Renton water drawing W-
0240 for detailed engineering plans) and an existing 8" water main in Duvall Ave NE (see City of Renton
water drawing W-0943 for detailed engineering plans). This project is located in the Aquifer Protection
Zone 2.
SANITARY SEWER: There is an existing 24" sanitary sewer main located in NE 4th St.
STORM: There are storm drainage facilities in NE 4th St and in Duvall Ave NE.
CODE REQUIREMENTS
WATER:
1. The preliminary fire flow requirement is 1,500 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant
is required within 150 feet of the proposed building and one hydrant is required within 300 feet.
Existing hydrants can be counted toward the requirement as long as they meet current code, including
5-inch storz fittings.
2. Installation of a minimum l" water meter with a RP in a "Hot Box" is required.
3. System Development Charges (SDCs) are based on the total number and size of any and all water
meters. The SDCs are collected as part of the construction permit.
SANITARY SEWER:
1. This project will need to connect to the existing MH in the intersection of NE 4th St and Duvall Ave NE
with a minimum 6" diameter pipe installing an inside drop connection.
QFC Fueling Facility-LUA 12-083
Page 2 of 3
November 13, 2012
2. A commercial building permit will trigger a separate review.
3. Separate drains for the concrete islands are required to be connected to an oil water separator
downstream in a vault in a positive direction. A shut off valve is required to be installed.
4. This site is located in the East Renton Special Assessment District (SAD 0002). This fee is $.0973 per
square foot of the parcel of land and is required to be paid prior to issuance of a construction permit.
5. SDCs are based on the size of the domestic water meter. The SDCs are collected as part of the
construction permit.
STREET IMPROVEMENTS:
1. Per the NE 3rd/NE 4th St Corridor Plan, construction of the typical street section needs to match the
existing curb on NE 4th St. This will include two 11-foot travel lanes, a two way left hand turn lane, and
a 5-foot bike lane adjacent to the new curb. The typical street section needs to show a 5-foot sidewalk
separated from the roadway curb and adjacent to the new property line, with a 5-foot planting strip
including street trees on NE 4th St. Additional right-of-way will be required to achieve the above.
2. Per City of Renton code, all lot corners at intersections of dedicated public rights-of-way shall have a
minimum radius of 25 feet. The curb return at the intersection of the two arterials NE 4th St and Duvall
Ave NE shall be R = 35.
3. The project and plans need to include the relocation of the traffic signal pole and controller, located
at NE 4th St & Duvall, as a part of this development.
4. The driveway access on NE 4th St needs to be right turn in and right turn out only, due to the close
proximity to the Duvall Ave NE intersection.
5. The Civil Plan set shall include the channelization plan (striping, buttons, arrows) on Duvall Ave NE.
6. The typical road section for Duvall Ave NE is 20-feet of pavement centerline to face of curb, a 5-foot
planting strip, and 5-foot sidewalk adjacent to property line.
7. Street lighting will be required to be installed fronting the parcel being developed.
8. A fill source statement will be required for any fill imported to the site.
9. Project is subject to a traffic impact fee or mitigation at the time of building permit issuance. Per the
adopted impact fee the amount due is $46,662.66 with credits.
STORM DRAINAGE:
1. The conceptual drainage plan and report was submitted with the formal application and is under
review at this time. The project shall comply with the City of Renton Amendments to the 2009 King
County Surface Water Design.
2. The applicant's civil engineer will look in the Manual under Section 1.2.3.1, Area-Specific Flow Control
Facility Requirement. This site is located, per the Flow Control Application Map, in the Flow Control
Duration Standard (Forested Conditions).
3. Surface Water SDC fees are $0.405 per square foot of Ofilll impervious area. These fees are collected
at the time a construction permit is issued.
H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PROJECTS\12-083.Vanessa\Plan Review Comments LUA 12-083.docx
QFC Fueling Facility -LUA 12-083
Page 3 of 3
November 13, 2012
GENERAL:
1. All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals,
prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer.
2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical Control
Network.
3. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of the fee
must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the
permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting
Standards.
H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PROJECTS\12-083.Vanessa\Plan Review Comments LUA 12-083.docx
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: D/1 n ''"' ·u , _,,, "i _ LCt 1 -, r-:-/\, i r A 1v
APPLICATION NO: LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A
APPLICANT: Tim Hansen, QFC, Inc.
PROJECT TITLE: QFC Fuel Center #871
SITE AREA: 22,092 square feet
LOCATION: 4615 NE 4'0 Street
COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 14, 2012
DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 30, 2012
PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee .~r,-· ri i Ii::';
PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger
EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A
PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) Canopy: 3,360 SF/Kiosk 120 SF
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a
QFC Fuel Center featuring a 3,360 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot cashier's kiosk at 4615 NE 4th Street. The project
would require the installation of a 20,000 gallon underground storage for unTeicled-fuel, and"a-n"iS,000 gallon split underground ,
fuel taking divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. The vacant site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone and
is 22,092 square feet in size. A limited right-in/right-out access is proposed along NE 4th Street and full access is proposed for
Duvall Avenue NE. Approximately 2,699 square feet would be dedicated to public right of way ang 2,800_cu_bic yards of cut and fill
activates is expected as a result of the application. There are 20 existing trees on the site, the applicatiftfas proposed to clear the
,ite and replant with 20 new trees. The site is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2, no other critical areas exist on the subject
site. A stormwater study, traffic study, geotechnical report, and a critical areas reconnaissance were submitted with the
application.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Em,ironment Minor Major Information
Element of the Probable Probable Mwe
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housina
Air Aesthetics
Water Liaht/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transrx,rtation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
1D,000Feet
14,DODFeet
8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Rut_,-9i .. , COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 14, 2012
•
APPLICATION NO: LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 30, 2012
APPLICANT: Tim Hansen, QFC, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee
:"::; \.._, '·'
PROJECT TITLE: QFC Fuel Center #871 PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger
-, "1
-< .JJ !fl
SITE AREA: 22,092 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A
LOCATION: 4615 NE 4'h Street PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) Canopy: 3,3Ml s1/Kio;k 120 s(
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a
QFC Fuel Center featuring a 3,360 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot cashier's kiosk at 4615 NE 4th Street. The project
would require the installation of a 20,000 gallon underground storage for unleaded fuel, and an 18,000 gallon split underground
fuel taking divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. The vacant site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone and
is 22,092 square feet in size. A limited right-in/right-out access is proposed along NE 4th Street and full access is proposed for
Duvall Avenue NE. Approximately 2,699 square feet would be dedicated to public right of way and 2,800 cubic yards of cut and fill
activates is expected as a result of the application. There are 20 existing trees on the site, the applicant has proposed to clear the
site and replant with 20 new trees. The site is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2, no other critical areas exist on the subject
site. A stormwater study, traffic study, geotechnical report, and a critical areas reconnaissance were submitted with the
application.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code} COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housina
Air Aesthetics
Water Liaht/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transoortation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000Feet
14,000Feet
8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
ll/'U1x ~ I~ .~-'v"V/pc~
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact
or areas where additional inform tion is needed to properly assess this proposal.
' .
FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT •'""'"' ~";""""~;;;;--· -....... .
··-···--,-----~1111:imnf!!l}l':!' ·
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
November 5, 2012
Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner
Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector
QFC Fueling Station
Environmental Impact Comments:
1. The fire mitigation impact fees are currently applicable at the rate of
$0.52 per square foot of building area. Fees are not charged for
canopy structures. Credit would be granted for the existing building to
be removed, so no new fees would apply as the old building is bigger
than the one proposed.
Code Related Comments:
1. The preliminary fire flow requirement is 1,500 gpm. Two fire hydrants
are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the
proposed building and one hydrant is required within 300-feet.
Existing hydrants can be counted toward the requirement as long as
they meet current code, including 5-inch storz fittings. It appears
adequate fire flow and fire hydrants exist in this area.
2. Separate plans and permits are required to be submitted to the
Renton Fire Department for review and permitting of all
underground fuel tanks and tank monitoring systems.
3. All new commercial fuel dispensing facilities shall be provided with
an approved on site standby power system to facilitate fuel
dispensing during local power outages or disaster.
4. Fire department apparatus access is adequate.
5. An electronic site plan is required to be submitted to the
Renton Fire Department for pre-fire planning purposes prior to
occupancy of the building.
• • City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 14, 2012
APPLICATION NO: LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 30, 2012
APPLICANT: Tim Hansen, QFC, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee
PROJECT TITLE: QFC Fuel Center #871 PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger
SITE AREA: 22,092 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A
LOCATION: 4615 NE 4th Street PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) Canopy: 3,360 SF/Kiosk 120 SF
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a
QFC Fuel Center featuring a 3,360 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot cashier's kiosk at 4615 NE 4th Street. The project
would require the installation of a 20,000 gallon underground storage for unleaded fuel, and an 18,000 gallon split underground
fuel taking divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. The vacant site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone and
is 22,092 square feet in size. A limited right-in/right-out access is proposed along NE 4th Street and full access is proposed for
Duvall Avenue NE. Approximately 2,699 square feet would be dedicated to public right of way and 2,800 cubic yards of cut and fill
activates is expected as a result of the application. There are 20 existing trees on the site, the applicant has proposed to clear the
site and replant with 20 new trees. The site is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2, no other critical areas exist on the subject
site. A stormwater study, traffic study, geotechnical report, and a critical areas reconnaissance were submitted with the
application.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housina
Air Aesthetics
Water Liaht/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transnr.rtotion
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000Feet
14,000Feet
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact
or areas where additional information is needed ta properly assess this proposal.
ffl'~> Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT, [c1 )f v )/! .. > lP/v COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 14, 2012
APPLICATION NO: LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 30, 2012
APPLICANT: Tim Hansen, QFC, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee
PROJECT TITLE: QFC Fuel Center #871 PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger
SITE AREA: 22,092 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A
LOCATION: 4615 NE 4'" Street PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) Canopy: 3,360 SF/Kiosk 120 SF
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a
QFC Fuel Center featuring a 3,360 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot cashier's kiosk at 4615 NE 4th Street. The project
would require the installation of a 20,000 gallon underground storage for unleaded fuel, and an 18,000 gallon split underground
fuel taking divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. The vacant site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone and
is 22,092 square feet in size. A limited right-in/right-out access is proposed along-NE 4th Street and fuli access is proposed for
Duvall Avenue NE. Approximately 2,699 square feet would be dedicated to public right of waund.1,8_00 cubic yards of cut and fill
activates is expected as a result of the application. There are 20 existing trees on the site, the applicant has proposed to clear the
site and replant with 20 new trees. The site is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2, no other critical areas exist on the subject
site. A stormwater study, traffic study, geotechnical report, and a critical areas reconnaissance were submitted with the
application.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code} COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minar Majar lnformatian
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housino
Air Aesthetics
Water Uaht/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Tronsoortotion
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000Feet
14,000Feet
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact
or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
or or Authorized Representative
i 1/2.../ iZ.
Date
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ( :Jurvi, '~ I ,Su,<-:.. COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 14, 2012
~ 1 ~ APPLICATION NO: LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 30, 2012
APPLICANT: Tim Hansen, QFC, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee
PROJECT TITLE: QFC Fuel Center #871 PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger
SITE AREA: 22,092 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A
LOCATION: 4615 NE 4'h Street PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) Canopy: 3,360 SF/Kiosk 120 SF
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a
QFC Fuel Center featuring a 3,360 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot cashier's kiosk at 4615 NE 4th Street. The project
would require the installation of a 20,000 gallon underground storage for unleaded fuel, and an 18,000 gallon split underground
fuel taking divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. The vacant site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone and
is 22,092 square feet in size. A limited right-in/right-out access is proposed along NE 4th Street and full access is proposed for
Duvall Avenue NE. Approximately 2,699 square feet would be dedicated to public right of way and 2,800 cubic yards of cut and fill
activates is expected as a result of the application. There are 20 existing trees on the site, the applicant has proposed to clear the
site and replant with 20 new trees. The site is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2, no other critical areas exist on the subject
site. A stormwater study1 traffic study, geotechnical report, and a critical areas reconnaissance were submitted with the
application.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Earth
Air
Water
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use
Animals
Environmental Health
Energy/
Noturol Resources
Probable
Minor
Impacts
8. POL/CY-RELATEO COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATEO COMf'{IENTS
1 ,)("c\·,cc·\__:-\ (\ \-'\,.
Probable
Major
Impacts
Mo
lnfor
Ne
re
motion
cessory
Element of the
Environment
Housin"n
Aesthetics
Liaht/Glare
Recreation
Utilities
Trans-~rtation
Public Services
Historic/Cultural
Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet -
I
L~c,.-\::_ -·,.
Probable Probable More
Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
We have reviewed this application with part(iUJGr-pttention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact
or areas ~h:!..e_ add1t1D'J_OI "!format/On 15 nezdedj properly aJess this proposal.
I ___ __ -""\ I /
<'\ ~ ---~/ l -..... ,,. -----\\.\ / _ _j 2 C'I\ .;.!
Signature of Director 6'r Authorized Representative Date
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 14, 2012
APPLICATION NO: LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 30, 2012
APPLICANT: Tim Hansen, QFC, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee ·: .-..
PROJECT TITLE: QFC Fuel Center #871 PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger
~ -:
;;:~ ,~-
--\ ' ;
SITE AREA: 22,092 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A ;'.; ;'i. , •.
LOCATION: 4615 NE 41
h Street
rn z , ·r
PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) Canopy: 3,36C?.SFi9(ioskJ;ZO SF,::).
0 -
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for till, construction of a
QFC Fuel Center featuring a 3,360 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot cashier's kiosk at 4615 NE 4th Street. The project
would require the installation of a 20,000 gallon underground storage for unleaded fuel, and an 18,000 gallon split underground
fuel taking divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. The vacant site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone and
is 22,092 square feet in size. A limited right-in/right-out access is proposed along NE 4th Street and full access is proposed for
Duvall Avenue NE. Approximately 2,699 square feet would be dedicated to public right of way and 2,800 cubic yards of cut and fill
activates is expected as a result of the application. There are 20 existing trees on the site, the applicant has proposed to clear the
site and replant with 20 new trees. The site is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2, no other critical areas exist on the subject
site. A stormwater study, traffic study, geotechnical report, and a critical areas reconnaissance were submitted with the
application.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code} COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water Liaht/Glare
Plants -Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation _...._
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
,·&.re._(~ c,f :5/,::p ~4-<~
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas
or areas where addition orma~needed to properly assess this proposal.
~. ~
Si
--·------
NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF
NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M)
A Masta, Appllc•llcn hu b••n fil•d •nO •«•~l•O with th• Oop>C1ment of Community & E<onornlc Developm•nl
IC£0)-Planning Plvi<lon of tho aty of R,nton, Toe lollow;r>i brlolly de,cdbu th• appik,tjM and th, necenary
P"bllcApp,wal,.
0/lTE Of NOTICE OF APPll(ATIO,. Octuoe, lO, Wll
LAND USE NUMBER: lLIA(:1-0S3. £Cf, SA·A
P~DJECT N/1,ME: QFC Fuel Center na71
PROJECT DE.SCRIPTION: The ap~l1c,nt h., requested SEPA E1wironrn<m•I Re,lew and Sit, Plan R,_i,w
fur the con,1ruct,on of• QFC Fuel Cente, !ulUrlng a 3,lr-0 square foot canopy •nd , l60 ,qua re fuot cashier', kiosk al
•615 NE 4th Street. The project would require the m,tall<Llon cl, 20,000 g•llor, underground storage for unleaded
fuel, and an 18,000 gallon ,plit und•r1round fuel tak,n~ diYad•d b•lw<!•n die,~! and supreme unleaded tuel. The """1
,ii• I• located In th, Commercial Arterial !CA) ,one •nd 1, n,092 square feet in 51,e. A limiled right-ln/ri~hl·o~t access
Is propo,od along N[ 4th Stre" and lull acces! i, propo,ed for Duvall A••nue NE. Appmximatelv 1,6~9 square leet
would b• d•dicated to public right of way and 2,800 cubk 1ards ol cul and /111 acb••I•• is .. p•ct~d ••, result o! the
application. Thero aft 20 e,ining tree> on lh• ,lie, the applicant halS proposed 10 clear1he ,ite and replaot w1th 20 new
tree,. The ,it," located ,n th,e Aquifer Proledion 2Me l., no oth,r critlcal area, exi,1 on the sub1ecl ,ite. A ,larmwater
study, traffic study, geote-chn,cal report, and a critical area, reconnaissance were ,ubmitt~d with the applk.1ion
PROJECT LOCATION: 4615 NE 4"Street
O?TIONAI. DETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANO::, MrTIGATED IDNS-MI: As the lud ~ency, th-e City of ll•nton ha,
d•l•rmlo•d th•I olgnl~cant ,nv;n;nmental Impact< are unlikely to re,uh from the propm•d prc)ed Tl>er•lo,,,. a,
permitted under the RCW 43.21C.ll0, th• C,ly of Renton i, u,i"l! th• Dpllon1I DNS-M P'"""" ,o gi,. no1;,e that a DNS.-
M Is likely to be l»ued. Cumm•nl ~rkids far th• proJ,ct and lhe proposed ONS·M aro integrated into a "ngl•
comm•nl P•'ID~-Thero will ~ no comment period tonow;ng the ;s,uance er th• Thce,hcld o,term,not;;n o~ tson-
Signlflcance-Mltl~iled jONS-M) A 14-day appeal period will follow t~e l>:,ui!n[! ol th• DNS·M.
PE/I.MIT AP PU CATION DATE:
NOTICE OF COMPLffi APPLICATION:
Sep1emt>er 26, 2012
Octob"' lO, WU
APPLICANT /PIIOJ!CT CONTACT PcR50N: /lob<rt McN•III, S•nlor Pl.Inner; Barih•u••n c,,.,.ul\lng [ntln•tr<,
In,.; 1Bl1S n"' A,enue S: Kent. WA geon; Eml:
mcnelll@bar1hauien.com
Parmlb/R1vlow ~uutod·
Other f><!rmll.S which may be roqulred:
Requuted Sludle,:
l.o<:atlon wher, appU,otlon m•v
bo reviewed:
Environmental IS£PA) Review, Admlnl<tratln Site Plan Rt•lew
8ulldln1 and Construction P,rmlt,
T,chnlcal lnlorm>tlon Re?ort. Gootod,nical lie port, T,atfic Study,
aod Crltiuil Areas R«onal, .. nc•
DepartmontM Community & Economic DHolopmonl {CEili-Pl•nnlnJ
Dl•hlon, 51.oth Flc,cr Renton Cit\' H,11, lOS5 South G"'dY War, Renton, WA
98057
If you would 111<• to h• m,d, • party of ••cord to rocoiY• hlr!t,or ;nlormation on thii propos•d project ,omple\e thi,
!(,rm and re1um ,o: City of Aeoton, CHI-~lanning l'.livi,ion, 10$S So ~rady Woy, l\enlon, WA 98057
Name/FIie No .. QFC 1=·,el CenW ~871/LUA12-Cr83, ECf, SA·A
,=, ----------------------------
MAllll\lG A[)[)R(S, _____________ City/State/Zip---------
THEPHON[ NO·-----------
PUBLIC HfARINS:
CON~l5TENCT OVERVl£W
Zonlng/l•nd Use
Envaronmenlil Oocumonl< that
E»luat, th, r,opo,~d Projoct:
Oe,olopm,nt Reiulatlons
U,ed fo, Pro jut Mlti,:atlon:
Propc,.d Mltlgallon Meosuru:
The ,ubje<\ >r\e i, de,ignaled Ccmrnerci,I Cor,ldo· iCCI un \he my ~f Ren\~n
Con>pr•"•cm~ lane ll,e Map and Cnmmerclal lo.tteriol lCA) or. the Cit(,
Zonins Map
r.,-·iro.,mental !SEPAi checOlist
Th, project "'ill b• ,ubjecl lo the City's 5EPA o,drnanc", R~C 4-l.(]>0, ~MC 4 <-
HOA. RMC 4-9-l(](J, RMC 4-9·070 and al her appl;cable coce, and regutat,on, a,
app,opriat..
The following Miligatlon Measure, will likely be impmed on the propo,ed
pmJ~ct. The'-"' recommended M1tl1a,,on Measur•s aodre~ project Impact> not
co,ered by e"1<tmg code\ ond reguli!lions •• cited abo,e.
The opplican/ w,N b, reqwrod M puy ~ oppmpnafe TraMpWlo/fon Mrt,gorlon Fee,
Th<e app//canl will be require<! lo par !he apprapriore fir• MJt,gt11fon F•e; on<!
11le app/konr will bi, r,qulre<f to pa~ rho aopropr/o/e Porl,;5 Ml!lpation Foe.
Comments on lh• abcv• •??lie.ail on"''"! bo ,ubmitt,,d In wr;tinr lo Vane«a Doi.,.•, Sonier Planner, CED -Planning
Olvl,lon, 105S $out~ Gra<lv W•v, R•nlon, WA 98057, t,y 5:Dll PM on No .. mbo, 14, lOll. l[you h,.., questions aOout
tho, proposal, or wo,h to b< made • party of rocord and receive ~ddlllon,1 notification b, mail, contac; the Project
MMager Anyone_who ,ubmlts wMtt•n comment, will automatically ti.come , party of rocord and will be notrfi•d of
any decl,.,n on thts project
CONTACT PERSON: Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner; Tel: (425} 430-7314; Eml:
vdolbee@rentonwa.gov
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN NG FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
---~:-· ~·-
=-7
CERTIFICATION
, hereby certify that .3 copies of the above document
were posted in -3._ conspicuous places or nearby the described property on
Date:_(_o--+( '3_0__,/ ...... 1_1-____ _ Signed:--:C-~
STATE OF WASHINGTON
ss
COUNTY OF KING
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that---'~,~-O'.\~~-L~«-w=~l <-S:~£ ____ _
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the
uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
NotatPublic if;~the State of Washington
Notary (Print): l:f. A
My appointment expires: /-:Z q, ' ,. 1 7 ___ ..,,..k-3 ... ~i .. , .. 5 .. : ----,,---2!.~u'-'=-"',_ ____ _
CITY OF RENTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT-PLANNING DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
On the 31st day of October, 2012, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing
Acceptance Letter, Notice of Application (NOA), Environmental Checklist, Reduced Site Plan documents. This
information was sent to:
' ·•,
Name Representing
Agencies -Env. Checklist, Site Plan, NOA See Attached
Robert McNeil! Contact
Tim Hansen, QFC Applicant
Hugh Stewart Owner
300' Surrounding Property Owners-NOA only See attached
(Signature of Sender): /0-7.Jfl ,W.At/
•-....._/
-'
II '\ #
STATE OF WASHINGTON
I :p-1/ J ·i.""'*"~ ., ) = ,-;
) ss E ..t'" -~
COUNTYOFKING ) I '-··"~' ~ llfl/l/l!1 ~
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Brianna Holt \ 41,i I-~~ /
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary\.t~...,,,,..,--~· li:i&'purposes ,,,,, _,,-'.!If.,=, I
mentioned in the instrument. ., ''"'"""'"'"
Dated: (),J,fu 3 ~ 26(2.
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Notary (Print): 1-f ;/. & a:,b-!( -------'--'----'---"--"=-=----------------My appointment expires:
template -affidavit of service by mailing
Dept. of Ecology **
Environmental Review Section
PO Box47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
WSDOT Northwest Region *
Attn: Ramin Pazooki
King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240
PO Box 330310
Seattle, WA 98133-9710
US Army Corp. of Engineers *
Seattle District Office
Attn: SEPA Reviewer
PO Box C-3755
Seattle, WA 98124
Boyd Powers *
Depart. of Natural Resources
PO Box47015
Olympia, WA 98504-7015
KC Dev. & Environmental Sen,.
Attn: SEPA Section
900 Oakesdale Ave. SW
Renton, WA 98055-1219
Metro Transit
Senior Environmental Planner
Gary Kriedt
201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431
Seattle, WA 98104-3856
Seattle Public Utilities
Real Estate Services
Attn: SEPA Coordinator
700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900
PO Box 34018
Seattle, WA 98124-4018
AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING
(ERC DETERMINATIONS)
WDFW -Larry Fisher"'
1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201
Issaquah, WA 98027
Duwamish Tribal Office *
4717 W Marginal Way SW
Seattle, WA 98106-1514
KC Wastewater Treatment Division "'
Environmental Planning Supervisor
Ms. Shirley Marroquin
201 S. Jackson ST, MS K5C-NR-050
Seattle, WA 98104-3855
City of Newcastle
Attn: Steve Roberge
Director of Community Development
13020 Newcastle Way
Newcastle, WA 98059
Puget Sound Energy
Municipal Liaison Manager
Joe Jainga
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. *
Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer
39015 -172"' Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092
Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program *
Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert
39015 172°' Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092-9763
Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation*
Attn: Gretchen Kaehler
PO Box48343
Olympia, WA 98504-8343
City of Kent
Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP
Acting Community Dev. Director
220 Fourth Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032-5895
City of Tukwila
Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-OlW Tukwila, WA 98188
Bellevue, WA 98009-0868
*Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities
will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of
Application.
**Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to
the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov
template -affidavit of service by mailing
4TH & BREMTERTON LLC % CLIF
2004 HOLIDAY CIR SE
OLYMPIA , WA 98501
ALIMENT DIANE
301 CHELAN PL NE #C-1
RENTON , WA 98059
BUENAFE MICHAEL T
4651 NE 3RD CT #A 1
RENTON , WA 98059
DEASIS NORMAN M+MARIBETH V
4650 NE 3RD LN UNIT F2
RENTON , WA 98059
FOOTE MICHAEL J
4601 NE 3RD CT ##B 3
RENTON , WA 98059
GRIFFITH LARRY L
201 UNION AVE SE #185
RENTON , WA 98059
HERRYGERS GARY M+KATHY J
325 CHELAN PL NE #D-1
RENTON , WA 98059
ISOLA REAL ESTATE II
555 RENTON VILLAGE PL S #570
RENTON , WA 98057
JONES NICOLE C
4661 NE 3RD CT #A-3
RENTON , WA 98059
LIOU YU CHIAO
4625 NE 3RD LN #G-4
RENTON , WA 98059
ALEXANDER DI A
4651 NE 3RD CT #A2
RENTON , WA 98059
BAGLEY SHAWNA
4600 NE 3RD LN UNIT E-1
RENTON , WA 98059
CHAN STEVEN+XIAO LING
4650 NE 3RD LN #F3
RENTON , WA 98059
DOWD KERRIJ
4660 NE 3RD CT #J4
RENTON , WA 98059
FULGHUM GARRY T
325 CHELAN PL NE UNIT D3
RENTON , WA 98059
GRIFFITH LAWRENCE L+SHARON
201 UNION AVE SE #185
RENTON , WA 98059
HIGHLAND PROFESSIONAL PLAZA
C/0 SUHRCE MANAGEMENT INC
2010 156TH AVE NE #100
BELLEVUE , WA 98007
JOHNSON BRUCE A
4650 NE 3RD LN #F1
RENTON , WA 98059
KEENE IAN+AMABEL
325 CHELAN PL NE #D-4
RENTON , WA 98059
MCCLINOY TIMOTHY
4604 NE 4TH
RENTON , WA 98059
ALEXANDER JACQUELINE V
301 CHELAN PL NE
RENTON , WA 98059
BROMM REBECCA L
4600 NE 3RD LN #E-4
RENTON , WA 98059
CLAYTON JASON H+EKOMO
4600 NE 3RD ST #E-3
RENTON , WA 98059
EASTSIDE FUNDING LLC
&3
3933 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD #100
KIRKLAND , WA 98033
GARRIS HEIDI M
4660 NE 3RD CT #J 3
RENTON , WA 98059
HCW FAMILY PARTNERS LLC
12509 130TH LN NE
KIRKLAND , WA 98034
HOSEA LINDA M
4625 NE 3RD LN #G 3
RENTON , WA 98059
JOHNSON ELEANOR L
320 CHELAN PL NE #H4
RENTON , WA 98059
LIN RENEE C+HSIEN-LAN ET AL
301 CHELAN PL NE #C 3
RENTON , WA 98059
MINA-NEAL GINA L
4650 NE 3RD LN #F-4
RENTON , WA 98059
•
MJELDE & HEINZ MOKEN LLC MONTGOMERYJERRYL
10950 164TH AVE SE 20119 106TH PL E 4526 NE 4TH
RENTON , WA 98059 BONNEY LAKE, WA 98391 RENTON , WA 98056
MOORE GERALDINE NGUYEN HENRY H+HANG S NICKEL & COMPANY LLC
325 CHELAN PL NE #D-2 320 CHELAN PL NE #H1 1014 VINE ST #7TH FLOOR
RENTON , WA 98059 RENTON , WA 98059 CINCINNATI , OH 45202
OLUWA-TOFEHINTI OLU+BOLANLE PETSCHE JEANNE L PHILIPS WILLIAMINA
4625 NE 3RD LN UNIT G2 4660 NE 3RD CT #J-1 4625 NE 3RD LN #G-1
RENTON , WA 98059 RENTON , WA 98059 RENTON , WA 98059
PYATESKAY ALLA RENTON MINI LLC SHEEN JOHN P+ADA J
C/0 URBAN SELF STORAGE
4601 NE 3RD CT #B1 918 S HORTON ST #1000 320 CHELAN PL NE #H-2
RENTON , WA 98059 SEATTLE, WA 98134 RENTON , WA 98059
STELLJES GREGORY SZWED ANETA WA RESTAURANT-HIGHLAND MKT
4601 NE 3RD CT #B-2 4660 NE 3RD CT #J-2 7525 SE 24TH ST STE 315
RENTON , WA 98059 RENTON , WA 98059 MERCER ISLAND , WA 98040
WALSH JOHN P WARNOCK TARA WIATR ANDREY
320 CHELAN PL NE #H-3 4601 NE 3RD CT UNIT B-4 4600 NE 3RD LN #E 2
RENTON , WA 98059 RENTON , WA 98059 RENTON , WA 98059
YEE ALAN C
4957 LAKEMONT BL VD SE #C4-305
BELLEVUE, WA 98006
Denis Law
Mayor
October 30, 2012
Robert McNeil!
Senior Planner
Department of Community and Economic Development
C.E. "Chi p"Vincent, Administrator
Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.
18215 72"d Avenue S
Kent, WA 98032
Subject: Notice of Complete Application
QFC Fuel Center #871, LUA12-083, ECF, SA-A
Dear Mr. McNeil!:
The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application
is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review.
It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on
November 19, 2012. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional
information is required to continue processing your application.
Please contact me at (425) 430-7314 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~-DJ~
' Vanessa Dolbee
Senior Planner
cc: Hugh Stewart -Eastside Funding LLC / Owner{s}
nm Hansen-Quality Food Centers, Inc./ Applicant
Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov
CIVIL HJGI\JFFRING, LANO Pl A:-..~JING. SURVFYING
Ms. Vanessa Dolbee, Associate Planner
September 26, 2012
HAND DELIVERY
Department of Community and Economic Development
Planning Division
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton WA 98057
Re: Application for SEPA Environmental Review and
Administrative Site Plan Review
QFC Fuel Center No. 871, Renton Highlands
4615 N .E. 4th Street, Renton Washington
QFC Store No. 871 / Our Job No. 15432. 1
Dear Ms. Dolbee:
SEP 2 6 101;
On behalf of our client, Quality Food Centers (QFC), a division of Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., Barghausen
Consulting Engineers, Inc. is pleased to submit the required application forms, plans, and supporting
documentation necessary to initiate the concurrent SEPA Environmental Review and Administrative Site
Plan Review processes in conjunction with the development of the QFC Fuel Center referenced above.
Scope of Project
The proposal calls for the construction of a new QFC Fuel Center featuring a 40-by 84-foot (3,360 square
feet) fuel canopy providing overhead shelter for an 8-by 20-foot (160 square feet) cashier's kiosk and five
(5) multi-product dispensers (MPDs), creating ten (10) vehicle fueling positions (VFPs).
The QFC proposal also includes the installation of multiple underground storage tanks (USTs): one
20,000-gallon UST to store regular unleaded fuel and one 18,000-gallon dual/split UST (10,000/8,000
gallons each) for the storage of premium and diesel fuels. Other associated site improvements will
include significant frontage improvements to the adjacent public rights-of-way, including dedications,
asphalt paving, perimeter landscaping and a pedestrian plaza, stormwater improvements, new lot lights,
parking (two stalls/one ADA stall), an emergency generator, and utility connections. The facility will be of
Type 11-B Construction and Class M Occupancy, as defined by the 2009 International Building Code
(IBC). Complete details on the various aspects of the project can be found in the attached
documentation.
Submittal Package
In accordance with the submittal requirements stipulated for the SEPA Environmental Review Process
and the Administrative Site Plan Review Process, Barghausen staff has prepared a submittal package
including the following:
1. Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. check No. 29777 presented at intake covering the
required fees associated with this submittal
2. One (1) original copy of the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements reviewed
September 14, 2012
18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX
BRANCH OFFICES + OLYMPIA, WA + CONCORD, CA + TEMECULA, CA
www.barghausen.com
Ms. Vanessa Dolbee, Associate Planner
Department of Community and Economic Development
Planning Division
City of Renton -2-
3. Five (5) copies of the Pre-Application Meeting Summary
4. Five (5) copies of the Waiver Form provided by Renton staff
September 26, 2012
5. Five (5) copies of a Title Report, File No. NCS-520794-0R1 as prepared by First American
Title Insurance Company, National Commercial Services, dated December 21, 2011, and a
more recent Title Guarantee, dated July 20, 2012 satisfying the requirement for copies of the
recorded documents referenced in said report
6. One (1) original Land Use Permit Master Application Form completed, signed, and dated,
including the following supplemental documentation as attachments:
• Notarized signatures of the applicant
• Attached legal description of the subject property
• Eleven (11) copies of the application and supplemental documentation
7. One (1) signed, original copy plus eleven (11) copies of the SEPA Environmental Checklist
completed, signed, and dated
8. Twelve (12) copies of a Comprehensive Project Narrative including a complete discussion of
modifications necessary to the applicable standards enforced on this project by the City of
Renton
9. Four (4) copies of preliminary documentation detailing proposed right-of-way dedications
along the property's N.E. 4th Street and Duvall Avenue frontages
10. Five (5) copies of the Design District "D" Checklist, detailing the project's conformity with
urban design criteria imposed on this project under specified standards and guidelines
11. Five (5) copies of a Construction Mitigation Narrative addressing various construction
activities, operational issues, and noise abatement
12. Two (2) copies of a Tree Retention Worksheet (Note: This document is also found on the
Significant Tree Plan, provided under Item No. 13.)
13. Five (5) copies of a Project Narrative addressing Landscaping, Lot Coverage and Parking
14. Five (5) copies of a Wetland Assessment summary prepared by Altmann Oliver LLC dated
March 21, 2012, confirming the there are no wetlands or streams/water courses on site
15. Five (5) copies of a Geotechnical Report and Analysis, prepared by The Riley Group, Bothell
Washington, dated August 22, 2012
16. Four (4) copies of a Technical Information Report (TIR), complying with the requirements of
City of Renton Drafting Standards and the current King County Surface Water Management
Design Manual
Ms. Vanessa Dolbee, Associate Planner
Department of Community and Economic Development
Planning Division
City of Renton -3-September 26, 2012
17. Five (5) copies of a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by Transportation
Engineering Northwest (TENW), Kirkland, Washington, dated September 10, 2012
18. One (1) photographic reduction at BY,-by 11-inch format of all full-size plans submitted as
part of this application plus one (1) photocopy of each photographic reduction
19. Twelve (12) copies of the following:
• Sheet T1 -Project Title Sheet, Index of Drawings
• Neighborhood Detail Map -Sheet EX-1
• Site Plan -Sheet AS1 .1, Architectural Site Plan, provided at staff's suggestion
complementing the details found on Sheet C6 of 9 of the Sanitary Sewer and Water Plan
• Grading and Storm Drainage Plans:
o C1 of 9, Civil General Notes
o C2 of 9, Demolition and Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control {T.E.S.C.)
Plan
o C3 of 9, Site Improvement Plan
o C4 of 9, Grading Plan
o C5 of 9, Storm Drainage Plan
o C6 of 9, Sanitary Sewer and Water Plan -Site/Utility Plan complementing the details
found on the Sheet AS1 .1, Architectural Site Plan
o C7 of 9, Construction Details
o CB of 9, Construction and T.E.S.C. Details
o C9 OF 9, Vault Details
20. Five (5) copies of the following:
• Landscape Planting Plans
o Sheet L-1, Landscape Planting Plan
o Sheet L-2, Significant Tree Plan, providing details of land clearing activity
• Architectural Plans and Elevations including, a basic floor plan for the cashier's kiosk
satisfying the requirement for the layout of structures:
o Sheet A 1.0, Kiosk Equipment and Foundation Plan
o Sheet A 1.1, Construction and Foundation Plans
o Sheet A2.0, Exterior Elevations and Signage
o Sheet A3.0, Yard Details
o Sheet SD-1, Trash Enclosure Plan and Details
Ms. Vanessa Dolbee, Associate Planner
Department of Community and Economic Development
Planning Division
City of Renton -4-
• ALTA/ ACSM Land Title Survey prepared by Owen B. Hille, P.L.S.
o Sheet 1 of 2
o Sheet 2 of 2
September 26, 2012
21. One (1) colored Display Map of each full-size plan required by the City of Renton for use at
public presentations and committee meetings
• EX-1, Neighborhood Detail Map (colored)
• EX-2, Canopy Elevations (colored)
• EX-3, Colored Site Plan
• EX-4, Colored Landscape Plan
Note: All documents and plans prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. and provided
in 22-by 34-inch formaUfolded, unless otherwise noted.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this application. Please advise us as to the completeness of this
submittal and the scheduling of any meetings necessary to complete the review of this application.
Should you have any questions, require additional documentation, or need further information, please
contact me directly at (425) 656-1061 or via e-mail at bmcneill@barqhausen.com. I look forward to your
reply.
RPM/dm
15432c.004.doc
enc: As Noted
cc: Mr. Brian Peterson, The Kroger Co.
Mr. Tim Hansen, QFC
Sincerely,
J2r>t4 J4ZcJtdt { it#--)
Robert P. McNeil!
Senior Planner
Mr. Jay S. Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Mr. Jason Hubbell, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Mr. Chris Ferko, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.
'-lL'A / Z -C d·o . (/ ,,
City of Renton ' o.'f:? '
LAND USE PERMIT
. ··(:·., . :eriton
. ,,.Vision
MASTER APPLICATION.
S,Lp 2 " 0 201;
-.. ·, , ·~;;:;• t'r':-;-.'! • " '
PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMA' 100
NAME: Eastside Funding LLC PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME:
c/o Hugh Stewart QFC Fuel Center #871 I Renton Highlands
ADDRESS· 3933 Lake Washington Blvd NE PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)ILOCATION AND ZIP CODE:
· Suite 100
4615 NE 4th Street
CITY: Kirkland WA ZIP: 98033 Renton WA 98059
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-803-9456 (Phone) KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S):
425-671-8721 (Fax)
1523059124
APPLICANT (if other than owner)
NAME: Tim Hansen
EXISTING LAND USE(S):
QFC Real Estate Manager Vacant/ Commercial Property
COMPANY (if applicable): Quality Food Centers, Inc.
PROPOSED LAND USE(S):
Commercial Retail / Fuel Facility
ADDRESS: 10116 NE 8th Street
EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
Commercial Corridor/ CC
CITY: Bellevue WA ZIP: 98004
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION
(if applicable) No Change Proposed
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-462-2163
EXISTING ZONING:
Commercial Arterial / CA
CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable):
No Channa -e"
NAME: Robert McNeill SITE AREA (in square feet):
Senior Planner 22,092 SF
COMPANY (if applicable): Barghausen Consulting
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE
DEDICATED: Engineers, Inc. -2,400 SF of dedication
ADDRESS: 18215 72nd Avenue S
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS:
N/A
CITY: Kent WA ZIP: 98032
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET
ACRE (if applicable) N/A
TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable)
Direct line: 425-656-1061 Ceil: 206-396-8598 N/A
Corporate: 425-251-6222 Fax: 425-251-8782 NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable):
bmcneill@barghausen.com N/A
H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\masterapp.doc -I -03/11
PROJECT INFORMAT,.:..:IO=N:...:_--'-' (c::...:o::..:.:n:.::ti::__cn=ue=d=I}-------~
NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE:
N/A $417,600 ... estimated
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable):
N/A
IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF
ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE
SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable):
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable):
N/A
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable): 3,360 / Canopy & 120 / Kiosk
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A ... Vacant
NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if
applicable): 3,480 SF/ Fuel Canopy & Kiosk Combined
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW
PROJECT (if applicable): 1-2 per Shift/ TBD
0 AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE
Iii AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO
0 FLOOD HAZARD AREA
0 GEOLOGIC HAZARD
0 HABITAT CONSERVATION
0 SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES
0 WETLANDS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
NIA
N/A
NIA
N/A
N/A
/Attach leaal descriation on seaarate sheet with the followina information included)
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
SITUATE IN THE NW1/4 QUARTER OF SECTION 15 , TOWNSHIP 23 , RANGE 5E , IN THE CITY ------
OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
I, (Print Name/s) t/:vt, I, 5 t£LN?lrt , declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
Washington that I am (please check one) __ the current owner of the property involved in this application or 1.../tt,e authorized
representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein
contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
dJ4!\: Elie/ti
Signature of Owner/Representative Date Signature of Owner/Representative Date
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss
COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that :fJ I,\<~~ Sto,.)cu t
signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her/the~free and voluntary act for the
uses and purpose mentioned in the instrument.
Dated ' Notary Public in an~ or the State of Washington
KARLAJ.HURST
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COMMISSION EXPIRES
JUNE 9. 2014
Notary (Print): _,h--"-C'-°"'-'"'c.._,.__~=-);..c·_iP'-"'=.f ..e~::,'--i ________ _
. . -L/
My appointment expires: ---'-""'---'--'--'-----------
H:\CED\Data\Form.s-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\masterapp.doc -2 -03/11
CONSENT TO ACTION IN LIEU OF SPECIAL MEETING OF MEMBERS OF
EASTSJDE FUNDING, LLC
The undersigned, being all the Members of the above Company, hereby consent
to, agree to and ratify the following resolution effective for all purposes on June 28, 2007,
in lieu of a special meeting of members, and do hereby unanimously adopt the following
resolutions:
RESOLVED, that Kristina Warren, Karla Hurst, Hugh Stewart, a Member
of the Company, and Brian Jessen, a Member of the Company, is each
hereby designated as an approved signing agent for Eastside Funding,
LLC. By virtue of such designation each such person is hereby authorized
to execute, by himself/herself, all documents on behalf of the Company,
including but not limited to purchase and sale agreements, addenda, loan
applications, loan documents, closing documents, approvals of HUD l's,
deeds, contracts, and any and all other documents required or convenient
to the sale or purchase of real estate, or promissory notes.
-~/':,::::;: :::.: ,-':=·,,:~~ ::_
Brian Jessen, Member
OSERAN HAHN SPRING & WATI 425+455+9201 P.03
J, SAM REED, Secietary of State oftbe State ofWashington and custodian ofit. seal,
hereby i5'uce thii
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
to
EASTSIDE FUNDING, LLC
a/an WA Limited Liability Company. Charter documents are effective on the da1:e
indicated below.
··"' -.,
Date: 514/2004
UBI Number. 60.2-392-325
APPID: 84754
Given uncle, '"Y 1,..,,J •n<l tho Seal ot the St.10
ofWa.~hingron a1 Olympia, the Smc Caph•L
Form WA-5 (6/76)
Commitment
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
EXHIBIT 'A'
File No.: NCS-520794-0Rl
Page No. 2
THE NORTH 180 FEET (AS MEASURED ALONG THE EAST LINE) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 15,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT THE WEST 150 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THE EAST 20 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1804907;
AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 35 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5849734;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF THE ARC OF A CIRCLE HAVING A RADIUS OF 25
FEET, SAID CIRCLE BEING TANGENT TO A LINE 35 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF
SAID SUBDIVISION AND TANGENT TO A LINE 20 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID
SUBDIVISION AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR S.E. 128TH STREET BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 24, 1987
UNDER RECORDING NO. 8706241488.
First American Title Insurance Company
PLANNING DIVISION
WAIV OF SUBMITTAL RE.QU . :MENTS
FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS
• ••••••·••••••• R~9i.i'R~M~NT$i••·················
Calculations 1
qpip/~ Miai!~fpfpi~pi~ff ·•·•••·•••n••••·•·•••···•·•···· ·
Construction Mitigation Description 2 AND 4
P~m¥gf Ri~~\\qi/W~v R#~~~ij#n >
Grading Plan, Conceptual 2
qf~qipQ pi~#: P¥~ir##;·••••••·•··· r··•·•·•········
Habitat Data Report 4
Irrigation Plan 4
ki1~•p9@1fA~s#~~:~•M~P 1n~is#\18~•~it#)••••••••••••••••
Landscape Plan, Conceptual,
i:.~ri8ii~r~ r1iw; p~t~i1~8}•••n•n•···>········· ·
Legal Description 4
~• qf $x1#ii@ tit~ pqH~1µ#ri~#•••••••••••••••••·············· ·
Master Application Form 4
MM\irn•fo/q~i~~KPri~p~fmPh~rn~r\U·························
Neighborhood Detail Map 4
e~in~:• WPttRi*iia~1·~•~~r~P~riri AH~'Y#.~·~·•·••··
Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4
ff<#\ Pffis~ AllPrPY<ll i .. ············· ... •· ................ .
WAIV1;:p
fl'()
MOOIFieb
...... av:•·•·••·
-. _; ['.:_· _.
This requirement may be waived by:
1. Property Services PROJECT NAME: Ut{I,, ft/€~ I (ei~tf V::
2. Public Works Plan Review
3. Building
4. Planning
DATE: ()/ 0/ IL r I
H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\waiverofsubmittalreqs.xls 06/09
PLANNING DIVISION
WAIVEF F SUBMITTAL REQUIRI ENTS
FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS
Plat Name Reservation 4
Urban Design Regulations Analysis 4
9*1,1,~~·~iW~i.@#r~r~ii~i••••••
Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final 4
W~!i~@{f0i~~~\i 8f/ Rl#!J; R1@mir~rx~ > >
Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3
Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND,
Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3
Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 ANDJ
Map of View Area 2 AND 3
Photosimulations 2 AND,
This requirement may be waived by:
1. Property Services
2. Public Works Plan Review
3. Building
4. Planning
PROJECT NAME:_,_(""-·~ F,....,(_·..,_, _\--'-,'-J 2__._l .....,C ...... e"'"'n--'-'-'+e=v:.___
DATE: ----"c='-/,./-/ ....... 1 .... ~-'-!/'-'1-"2..=--------
H:\CED\Dala\Forms-Templates\Self~Help Handouts\Planning\waiverofsubmittalreqs.xls 06/09
PREAPPLICATION MEETING FOR
QFC FUEL CENTER 4TH & DUVALL PREAPP
4615NE4TH ST
CITY OF Rl:NTON
Department of Community and Economic Development
Planning Division
Contact Information:
Planner: Vanessa Dolbee
PRE12-017
March 15, 2012
Phone: 425.430.7314
Public Works Reviewer: Arneta Henninger Phone: 425.430.7298
Fire Prevention Reviewer: Corey Thomas Phone: 425.430. 7024
Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell Phone: 425.430.7290
SEP 2 S '/IJ1'i
Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference.
Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work
on the project. You will need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply for
land use and/or environmental permits.
Pre-screening: When you have the project application ready for submittal, call and
schedule an appointment with the project manager (planner) to have It pre-
screened before making all of the required copies.
The pre-application meeting Is Informal and non-binding. The comments provided
on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the tfme of review.
The applicant Is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly
amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in
effect at the time of project submittal. The Information contained In this summary
is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g.,
Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Development Services Director, Department
of Community and Economic Development Administrator, Public Works
Administrator and City Council).
FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 11[') City of. ~:.
-------im®Jo1\t®JID1 o MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
March 1, 2012
Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner
Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector
QFC Fueling Station
1. The preliminary fire flow requirement is 1,500 gpm. Two fire hydrants
are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the
proposed building and one hydrant is required within 300-feet.
Existing hydrants can be counted toward the requirement as long as
they meet current code, including 5-inch storz fittings. It appears
adequate fire flow and fire hydrants exist in this area.
2. The fire mitigation impact fees are currently applicable at the rate
of $0.52 per square foot of building area. Fees are not charged for
canopy structures. Credit would be granted for the existing
building to be removed, so no new fees would apply as the old
building is bigger than the one proposed.
3. Separate plans and permits are required to be submitted to the
Renton Fire Department for review and permitting of all
underground fuel tanks and tank monitoring systems.
4. All new commercial fuel dispensing facilities shall be provided with
an approved on site standby power system to facilitate fuel
dispensing during local power outages or disaster.
5. · Fire department apparatus access is adequate.
6. An electronic site plan is required to be submitted to the
Renton Fire Department for pre-fire planning purposes prior to
occupancy of the building. See attached sheet for the format in
which to submit your plans.
Renton Fire Department
Pre Fire Planning
In an effort to streamline our pre-fire process, we are requesting that you submit a site
plan of your construction project in one of the following formats which we can then
convert to VISIO.vsd. This is required to be submitted prior to occupancy.
ABC Flowcharter.af3
ABC Flowcharter.af2
Adobe Illustrator File.ai
AutoCad Drawing.dwg
AutoCad Drawin11:.dm
Computer Graphics Metafile.c1Zm
Corel Clioart Format.cmx
Corel DRAW! Drawing File Fmmat.edr
Corel Flow.cf!
Encapsulated Postscript File.eps
Enhanced Metafile.emf
IGES Drawing File Format.igs
Graphics Interchange Format.!!if
Macintosh PICT Format.net
Micro1ITafx Designer Ver 3.1.drw
Micrografx Designer Ver 6.0.dsf
Microstation Drawing.dim
Portable Network Graphics Format.pnf
Postscript File.os
Tag Image File Format.tif
Text.tJct
Text.csv
·VISIO.vsd
Windows Bitmap.bmp
Windows Bitrnap.dib
Windows Metafile.wmf
Zsoft PC Paintbrush Bitmap.pcx
h:\ced\planning\currcnt planning\preapps\12-017. vanessa\qfcgas.doc
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
March 13, 2012
Vanessa Dolbee, Planner
Arneta Henninger, Plan Review /t#
QFC Fueling Station at NE 4 TH St & Duvall Ave
4615 NE 4TH St
PRE 12-017 Parcel 1523059124
(see PRE l!l-046 and PRE 09-!127)
NOTE: The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary is preliminary and non-
binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official city decision-makers. Review
comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by
City staff or made by the applicant.
I have completed a preliminary review for the above-referenced proposal for the QFC gas station,
located at the southwest corner of NE 4•h St and Duvall Ave NE, all in Section 15, Township 23N, Range
SE, which proposes a to construct a cashier's kiosk covering nine multi-product dispensers and creating
10 vehicle fueling positions (project includes restrooms). The following comments are based on the pre-
application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant for a refueling station.
Water
1. There is an existing 8" Cl water main located in NE 4th St {see City of Renton water drawing W-
0240 for detailed engineering plans) and an existing 8" water main in Duvall Ave NE (see City of
Renton water drawing W-0943 for detailed engineering plans).
2. This project is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2.
3. Construction of a commercial building will trigger a separate review.
4. Per the City of Renton Fire Marshal, the preliminary fire flow calculated for this site is 1,500
GPM. A minimum of two fire hydrants is required.
5. Any new construction must have one fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000
GPM and shall be located within 150 feet of the front of the structure, and additional hydrants
(also capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM) within 300 feet of the front of the.
structure. This distance is measured along the travel route. The number of additional hydrant.s
required is dependent on the calculated fire flow of the new cotnmercial building. Existing fire
hydrants shall be retrofitted with a quick disconnect Stortz fitting.
6. Per City records there is an existing %''water meter on the site. The proposed gas station would
need to install a minimum 1" water meter with a Reduced Pressure Backflow Prevention Device
in a 11 Hot Box1
',
QFC Fueling Station-PRE 12-017
Page 2 of3
March 13, 2012
7. The existing ')>"meter might be considered for use as the irrigation meter, in which case a DCVA
is required at the meter.
8. The Water System Development Charge· is based on the size of any and all water meters. They
are triggered if there is a new water meter or if an existing water meter is upsized. Credit is
granted for the existing service. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is
issued.
sanitary Sewer
1. There is an existing 24" sanitary sewer main located in NE 4th St.
2. This project will need to connect to the existing MH in the intersection of NE 4th St and Duvall
Ave NE by installing an inside drop connection.
3. A commercial building permit will trigger a separate review. The applicant needs to show how
this site will be served with a commercial side sewer with a minimum 6" diameter pipe.
4. Separate drains for the concrete islands are required to be connected to an oil water separator
downstream in a vault in a positive direction. A shut off valve is required to be installed.
5. There may be an abandoned septic tank and/or a drain field on this site which will need to be
abandoned in accordance with the King County Health Dept.
6. This site is located in the East Renton Special Assessment District (SAD 0002). This fee is $.0973
· per square foot of the parcel of land and is required to be paid prior to issuance of a
construction permit.
7. The Sanitary Sewer System Development Charge is based on the size of the domestic water
meter. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued.
Storm Drainage
1. There are storm drainage facilities in NE 4th St and in Duvall Ave NE.
2. A conceptual drainage plan and report is required to be submitted with the formal application
for a commercial project. The project shall comply with the City of Renton Amendments to the
2009 King County Surface Water Design.
3. Your civil engineer will look in the Manual under ~C!,i!)n_J,_.~.3.1 Area-Specific Flow Control
Facility Requirement. This site is located, per the Flow Control Application Map, in the Flow
Control Duration Standard (f_c:,r:.~st{!~ Con(jitjO!)S}.
4. The Surface Water SDC fees are $0.405 per square foot of new impervious area. These fees are
collected at the time a construction permit is issued.
Street Improvements
1. Per the NE 3rd/NE 4th St Corridor Plan, the proposal needs to construct the typical street
section matching existing curb on NE 4th St. This will include two 11-foot travel lanes, a two-
way left hand turn lane, and a 5' bike lane adjacent to the new curb. The typical street section
needs to show a 5-foot sidewalk separated from the roadway curb and adjacent to the new
property line, with a planting strip Including street trees on NE 4th St. Additional right-of-way
will be required to achieve the above.
2. Per City of Renton code, property corners in commercial blocks atintersections of public rights-
of-way shall have a dedicated minimum_radius of 25 feet.
3. The curb return for the arterial is required to be dedicated at the minimum radius of 35 feet for
the intersection of NE 4th St and Duvall Ave NE.
4. The plans must include the relocati.<m of th_e traffic signal pole and controner, located at NE 4th
St & Duvall, as part of this development design. ·
H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PRE12-017.Vanessa\Plan Review Comments PRE 12-017.doc
QFC Fueling Station-PRE 12-017
Page 3 of 3
March 13, 2012
5. The driveway access on NE •th St shall be right tum in and rightturn out only due to the close
proximity to the Duvall Ave NE intersection.
6. A channelization plan (striping, buttons, arrows) for Duvall Ave NE will be required.
7. The typical road section for Duvall Ave NE is 20' paving from centerline to face of curb, and 5'
sidewalk adjacent to property line.
8. A Traffic Study is required addressing queuing and driveway/access safety evaluations.
General Comments
1. All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals
prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer.
2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical Control
Network.
3. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of the
fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder
when the permits are issued. There will be additional fees for water service related expenses.
See Drafting Standards.
H:\CED\Planning\Current Plannlng\PRE12·017.Vanessa\Plan Review Comments PRE 12-017.doc
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Pre-application File No. 12-017
FROM: Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: QFC F!Jel Center
General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above-
referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and
permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of
Renton by the applicant and the codes In effect on the date of review. The applicant is
cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification
and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Community &
Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator, Planning Director,
Development Services Director, a_nd City Council). Review comments may also need to
be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or
made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of
the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase
for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or on line at
www.rentonwa.gov
Project Proposal: The subject site consists of one lot located at the southwest corner of
the intersection of NE 4th Street and Duvall Avenue NE. Currently, the lot is vacant with
two curb cuts (one on NE 41h and the other on Duvall). There are currently no curbs and
sidewalks, except a small portion at the corner intersection. The site is 22,092 square
feet/0.51 acres in area. The applicant proposes to construct a. QFC Fuel Center with a
43-by 92-foot canopy, a 160 square foot cashier's kiosk, and space for 10 vehicle fueling
positions. The development would include the installation of two underground storage
tanks, one 20,000-gallon for regular unleaded fuel and one 18,999-gallon split or dual
tank divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. Vehicular access would be
provided on both NE 4th Street and Duvall Avenue NE, i-n-;;ddition ·-t~ an -internal"
veliicular connection-t~ the property to the south. The site is currently zoned
Commercial Arteri~I (CA) and is located withi~ Urban Design District 'D'. The abutting
and adjacent properties are all zoned CA. The City's Critical Areas Maps indicate an
onsite wetland, Maplewood Creek (Class 4 stream) and that the property is within an
Aquifer Protection Area (Zone 2).
QFC Fuel Center, PRE12-017
Page2 o/7
March 151 2012
Current Use: The subject site is currently vacant.
Zoning: The property is located within the Commercial Corridor (CC) land use
designatio11 and the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. Vehicle fueling
stations are outright permitted within the CA zone. The property is also located within
Urban Design District 'D', and therefore subject to additional design elements.
Proposals should have unique, identifiable design treatment in terms of landscaping,
building design, signage and street furniture.
Development Standards: The project would be subject to RMC 4-2-120A, "Development
Standards for Commercial Zoning Designations" effective at the time of complete
application (noted as "CA standards" herein). A copy of these standards Is included.
Minimum Lot Size, Width and Depth -There are no minimum requirements for lot size,
lot width or depth within the CA zone at this location.
Lot Coverage -The CA zone allows a maximum building coverage of 65 percent, or 75
percent if parking is provided within a building or within an on-site parking garage.
There appears to be a 4,116 square foot footprint on the 22,092 square foot site;
resulting in a building lot coverage of approximately 18.63 percent. The project proposal
appears to comply with lot coverage requirements. At the time of formol land use
application the applicant will required to provide a lot coverage analysis and
calculations for the subject site.
Setbacks-Setbacks are the distance b.etween the building and the property line or,any
private access easement. Setback requirements in the CA zone are as follows: 10 feet
minimum for the front yard and side yard along a street but may be reduced to zero feet
through the site plan review process provided blank walls are not located within the
reduced setback. The maximum front yard setback is 15 feet. It appears that the
fueling station exceeds the maximum front yard setback allowed by code. The
maximum setback may be modified by the Reviewing Official through the site
development plan review process if the applicant can demonstrate that the site
development plan meets the fallowing criteria:
a. Orients development to the pedestrian through such measures as providing
pedestrian walkways beyond those required by the Renton Municipal Code
(RMC), encouraging pedestrian amenities and supporting alternatives to single
occupant vehicle (SOV) transportation; and
b. Creates a low scale streetscape through such measures as fostering
distinctive architecture and mitigating the visual dominance of extensive and
unbroken parking along the street front; and
c. Promotes safety and. visibility through such measures as discouraging the
creation of hidden spaces, minimizing conflict between pedestrian and traffic
and ensuring adequate setbacks to accommodate required parking and/or
access that could not be provided otherwise.
•
QFC Fuel Center, PRE12-017
Page 3 of7
March 15, 2012
Detailed elevations are required in order to provide an estimation of support for the ·
proposed front yard setback in excess of the maximum 15{eet.
There is no minimum rear or side yard s.etbacks unless the project site is adjacent to
residential zoned property. The project site does not abut a residentially zoned
property. Therefore, the buildings/structures on this site are not subject to an increased
setback. --------
Gross Floor Area -There are no minimum requirements for gross floor area within the
CA zone.
Building Height -The maximum building height allowed in the CA zone is 50 feet.
Building elevations and detailed descriptions of elements and building materials are
required with a formal land use submittal and/or building permit application. Elevation
drawings were submitted with the pre-application materials however the drawings
were not to scale, there/are, compliance with height limits would be verified at the
time of formal application.
Screening -Screening must be provided for all surface-mounted and roof top utility and
mechanical equipment. The application will need to include elevations and details for
the proposed methods of screening.
Refuse and Recycling Areas -Refuse and recycling areas need to meet the requirements
of RMC 4-4-090, "Refuse and Recyclables Standards". In manufacturing and other
nonresidential developments, a minimum of three (3) square feet per every one
thousand (1,000) square feet of building gross floor area shall be provided for
recyclables deposit areas and a minimum of six (6) square feet per one thousand {1,000)
square feet of building gross floor area shall be provided for refuse deposit areas. A total.
minimum area of one hundred (100) square feet shall be provided for recycling and
refuse deposit areas. Refuse and recycling information was not provided with the pre-
application materials. Compliance with this standard will be verified at time of formal
land use review.
Landscaping -Except for critical areas, all portions of the development area not covered
by structures, required parking, access, circulation or service areas, must be landscaped
with native, drought-resistant vegetative cover. The development standards require
that all pervious areas within the property boundaries be landscaped. The minimum
onsite landscape width required along street frontages is 10 feet, except where reduced
through the site plan development review process. Right-of-way dedications along NE
4th Street and Duvall Avenue NE are required; onsite landscaping would be calculated
after such right-of-way dedications. The submitted site plan does not indicate any
landscaping.
Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070} for further·general and specific
landscape requirements (enclosed}. Please also note that RMC 4-4-0lOF.6 specifies
landscape standards for parking lats. Since the site is located within Design District D,
there are further landscape requirements within the Design District Guidelines (RMC 4-
3,100}. A conceptual .landscape plan and landscape analysis meeting the
QFC Fuel Center, PRE12-017
Page 4 of7
March 15, 2012
requirements in RMC 4-8-120D.12 must be submitted at the time of formal land use
application and/or building permit.
Tree Preservation -A tree inventory and a tree retention plan along with a tree
retention worksheet shall be provided with the formal land use application. The tree
retention plan must show preservatian a/ at least 5 percent of significant trees, and
indicate how proposed development would be sited to accommodate preservation of
significant trees that would be retained. If the trees tan not be retained, they may be
replaced with minimum 2 Inch caliper trees at a rate of six to one
Fences-If the applicant intends to install any fences as part of this project, the location
must be designated on the landscape plan. A fence detail should also be included on
the plan as well.
Parking -Drive-through facilities shall be so located that sufficient on-site vehicle
stacking space is provided for the handling of motor vehicles using such facility during
peak business hours. Typically 5 stacking spaces per window are required unless
otherwise determined by the Planning Director. Stacking spaces cannot obstruct
required parking spaces or ingress/egress within the site or extend into the public right-
of-way.
One parking space would be required for the cashier's kiosk.
Vehicle stacking and parking were not indentified on the provided application materials;
therefore staff could not determine compliance with these standards. Information shall
be provided with the formal land use application to determine compliance with
parking and vehicle standing requirements.
Access -Driveway widths are limited by the driveway standards, i.n RMC 4-4-080!.
There are sections of the street frontages on both NE 4th Street and Duvall Avenue NE
that are paved in a fashion that suggests previous driveways were once located there.
The Urban Design District 'D' guidelines state that parking lots should be accessed from
alleys or side streets.
Pedestrian Access -A pedestrian connection must be provided from a public entrance
to the street, in order to provide direct, clear and separate pedestrian walks from
sidewalks to building entries and internally from buildings to abutting retail properties.
It appears that the proposal does not provide adequate pedestrian connections to NE
4th Street or Duvall Avenue NE. The applicant would be required to revise the site plan
to include pedestrian connections through the development to both streets.
Signage -Only one freestanding business sign (monument/ground, projecting or roof)
ls permitted per street frontage. Each sign shall not exceed an area greater than one
and one-half square feet for each lineal foot of property front,age that is occupied.by
the business. fo no case shall the sign exceed a total of 300 square feet (150 square
feet per face). In addition to the permitted freestanding sign, a wall sign with a copy
area not exceeding 20% of the fa~ade to which it is applied Is also permitted. No new
poles signs are permitted within the CA zone.
•
QFC Fuel Center, PRE12-017
Page S of7
March 15, 2012
lighting -Per RMC 4-4-075A, no use shall cause light trespass beyond the boundaries of
the property lines. A lighting plan shall be submitted at the time of formal land use
application and/or building permit for review and approval by the Planning Division
Project Manager ..
------Ruilding--0esign--5tandards--fE>istfiet--D)1-Comp/iance--with-VrbaR--lJesign-Regulations1-------
District 'D', is required along i:he eastern facade. See the attached checklist and
Renton Municipal Code section 4-3-100. The following bullets are a few of the
standards outlined in the regulations.
• The front entry of all building shall be oriented to the street or a landscaped
pedestrian-only courtyard.
• Service enclosures shall be made of masonry, ornamental metal or wood, or
some combination of the three (3).
• Developments located at district gateways shall be marked with visually
prominent features. Gateway elements shall be oriented toward and scaled for
both pedestrians and vehicles.
• Parking shall be located so that it is screened from surrounding streets by
buildings, landscaping, and/or gateway features as dictated by location
• The number of driveways and curb cuts shall be minimized, so that pedestrian
circulation along the sidewalk is minimally impeded.
• A pedestrian circulation system of pathways that are clearly delineated and
connect buildings, open space, and parking areas with the sidewalk system and
abutting properties shall be provided
• Architectural elements that incorporate plants, particularly at building entrances,
in publicly accessible spaces and at facades along streets, shall be provided.
• Pedestrian overhead weather protection in the form of awnings, marquees,
canopies, or building overhangs shall be provided. These elements shall be a
minimum of four and one-half feet (4-1/2') wide along at least seventy five
percent (75%) of the length of the building facade facing the street, a maximum
height of fifteen feet (15') above the ground elevation, and no lower than eight
feet (8') above ground level.
• A Public plaza shall be provided at the intersection of NE 4th Street and Duvall
Avenue NE. The plaza shall measure no less than one thousand (1,000) square
feet with a minimum dimension of twenty feet (20') on one side abutting the
sidewalk. The public plaza must be landscaped consistent with RMC 4-4-070,
including at minimum street trees, decorative paving. pedestrian-scaled lighting,
and seating. Such pedestrian plaza has not been indicated on the site plan
submitted with the pre-application materials. The required plaza area must be
shown on the site plan and landscape plans submitted with the formal land use
action.
QFC Fuel Center, PRE12-017
Page6of7
March 15, 2012
Critical Areas: ·sased on the City's Critical Areas Maps, the site is located within Aquifer
Protection Area (Zone 2), identified wetland area, and in the vicinity of Maplewood
Creek {Class 4 stream).
Aquifer Protection Zone 2: The project proposes to store hazardous materials on site.
As such the project will be subject to additional requirements under RMC 4-3-0SOH.2.d
(enclosed) which may include but is not limited to secondary containment, hazardous
material monitoring, emergency collection devices, inspection of containment and
emergency equipment, and employee training. Hazardous materials shall not be spilled,
leaked, emitted, discharged, disposed, or allowed to escape or leach into the air, into
groundwater, surface water, surface soils or subsurface soils. Exception: Intentional
withdrawals of hazardous materials for the purpose of legitimate sale, use, or disposal
and discharges permitted under federal, state, or local law.Additionally, if the project
involves the placement of more than one hundred (100) cubic yards of imported fill,
then a source statement would be required for each source location from which
imported fill will be obtained.
Wetland: The site is located within or near a wetlands area. A wetland reconnaissance
. .. ~.-----·--------·--··-· --
shall be provided, clarifying the presence of wetlands on site. If wetlands are
determined to be located on ar near the subject site, a wet/and assessment and
delineation would also be required.
Stream: Maplewood Creek is a Class 4 stream which requires a 35-foot stream buffer
measured from the bank (ordinary high water mark). A stream report delineating and
classifying the stream on site Is required to be submitted with the-f;rmal land use
application. In addition, if there are proposed impacts to the stream, a mitigation plan
should also be submitted. City staff may require secondary review of the stream report,
at the expense of the applicant.
Environmental Review
The proposed project would be subject ta Washington State Environmental Policy Act
{SEPA). Therefore, an environmental checklist is a · submittal requirement. An
environmental determination will be. made by the Renton Environmental Review
Committee. This determination is subject to appeal by either the project proponent, by
a citizen of the community, or another entity having standing for an appeal.
Permit Requirements
The proposal would require Administrative Site Plan and Environmental (SEPA) Review.
The purpose of the Site Plan process is the detailed arrangement of project elements so
as to be compatible with the physical characteristics of a site and with the surrounding
area. An additional purpose of Site Plan is to ensure quality development consistent
with City goals and policies. General review criteria includes the following:
a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan;
b. Conformance with existing land use regulations;
QFC Fuel Center, PRE12-017
Page 7 of7
March 15, 2012
c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses;
d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site;
e. Conservation of areawide property values;
f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation;
g. Provision of adequate light and air;
h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions;
i. Availability of public services and facilities; and
j. P,revention of neighborhood deterioration and blight.
The applicant will also be subject to Design Review as part of the Site Pl.an Review and a
Design Checklist shall be completed and submitted as part of the application materials.
All applications can be reviewed concurrently .in an estimated time frame of 12 weeks
once a complete application is accepted. The Site Plan Review application fee is $2,000.
The application fee for SEPA Review (Environmental Checklist) is $1,000. A 3%
technology fee, for land use application fees, would also be assessed at the time of
application. Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal is
provided in the attached handouts.
In addition to the required land use permits, separate construction, building and sign
permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with
the review of the land use permits, but cannot be issued prior to the completion of
any appeal periods.
Impact Mitigation Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction fees, the
following mitigation fees would be required prior to the issuance of building permits.
Impact fees, which would replace mitigation fees, may be adopted prior ta construction.
Thase fees are to be determined.
• A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per new daily trip £ attributed to the development; r/<~~x A Fire Mitigation Fee based o~ $0.52 per square foot of new commercial ~ ~ building area.
~t}l • A handout listing all of the City's Development-related fees is attached for reference.
· Expiration: Upon site plan approval, the site plan approval is valid for two years with a
possible two-year extension.
cc: Jennifer Henning
0
Cily of Ren!on, Washing'.on
Aerial
150.5 Feel This map is a user gerier.i~ed static oulpu! from sn fntemet mapping site
is for reference only. Data layers th.it .ippearon this map may or may m
acctrrale, current, or otherwise reli1
TH!S MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATl
1 .. ///
...
I
Ra
I
ZONING MAP BOOK
i
.... ·~.I
PW TECH NICAl SERVICES
PRINTED ON 11/13/09 ...,, ...... ,"' •• ",,i,:, .......... ..,.,, ... ,
......................... f'I' ... _ .... , ..
""'"', ............. , .......... 1111o..,,,1,o...,_
"''"''"~'""°il,,Otr6,,'"-''""'-
E6 -10 T23N RSE W 1/2
G6 -22 T23N RSE W 1/2 F6
a 200 <100
l!'H~Wiiiil""~I ''" 15 T23N R5E W 1/2
1:4,800
531S
City of Renton
TREE RETENTION
WORKSHEET
...::,,
1. Total number of trees over 6" in diameter1 on project site: 1.
2. Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation:
Trees that are dead, diseased or dangerous2 __ 4 __ trees
Trees in proposed public streets o trees
Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts o trees
Trees in critical areas3 and buffers o trees
Total number of excluded trees:
3. Subtract line 2 from line 1:
2.
3.
____ 4 ___ trees
___ 1_6 ___ trees
4. Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained4, multiply line 3 by:
0.3 in zones RC, R-1, R-4, or R-8
0.1 in all other residential zones
0.05 in all commercial and industrial zones 4. ______ trees
5. List the number of 6" or larger trees that you are proposing 5 to retain 4 :
5. 0 trees
6. Subtract line 5 from line 4 for trees to be replaced: 6. ______ trees
(If line 6 is less than zero, stop here. No replacement trees are required).
7. Multiply line 6 by 12" for number of required replacement inches:
7. ___ 1_2 ___ inches
8. Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement:
(Minimum 2" caliper trees required) 8. ____ 2 ___ inches
9. Divide line 7 by line 8 for number of replacement trees6 :
per tree
(if remainder ls .5 or greater, round up to the next whole number)
1
-Measured at chest height.
9. ____ 6 ___ trees
2
-Dead, diseased or dangerous trees must be certified as such by a forester, registered landscape architect, or
certified arborist, and approved by the City.
3
· Critical Areas, such as wetlands, streams, floodplains and protected slopes, are defined in Section 4-3-050 of
the Renton Municipal Code (RMC).
4
· Count only those trees to be retained outside of critical areas and buffers.
5
· The City may require modification of the tree retention plan to ensure retention of the maximum number of
trees per AMC 4-4-13DH7a
6
· Inches of street trees, inches of trees added to critical areas/buffers, and inches of trees retained on site that
are less than 6" but are greater than 2~ can be used to meet the tree replacement requirement.
H :\CED\Data\Fom1s-T emplates\Sel f-Help Handouts\Planning \TreeRetention W orksheel .doc 12/08
Comprehensive Project Narrative
Submitted in Conjunction with
SEPA Environmental Review and Administrative Site Plan Review
Conducted by the City of Renton,
Department of Community and Economic Development Planning Division
Under the Auspices of the State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) .···;:; i ,.) .• r~.:;,·'. ;) ,,
Project Name
QFC Fuel Center -#871 Renton Highlands
Project Location
Project Site
4615 NE 4th Street, Renton WA 98057
QFC Store No. 871 BCE No. 15432.1
Parcel Number 152305-9124
SEP 2 6 ZO\;_
The proposed QFC Fuel Center would be built on a single parcel/corner lot located at 4615 4th Street NE,
Renton WA 98057; immediately adjacent to the intersection of NE 4th Street and Duvall Avenue NE. The
project site is approximately 22,092 square feet and is located in the immediate vicinity of a QFC retail
store and other diverse commercial uses, located approximately 600 feet to the NE, across the
intersection of 4th and Duvall, within an established shopping center.
Project Scope
QFC's proposal calls for the construction a 40-by 84-foot fuel canopy (3,360 square feet) and an 8-by
20-foot (160 square feet) cashier's kiosk with ADA-accessible restroom. Using the 2009 International
Building Code {IBC), the canopy and kiosk would be built using Type 11-B construction and categorized as
a Class M Occupancy. The canopy will provide protective cover for five (5) multi-product dispensers
(MPDs), creating a fuel facility with ten (10) vehicle fueling positions (VFPs).
The facility will also require the installation of two (2) underground storage tanks (USTs); one 20,000-
gallon UST for the storage of regular unleaded fuel, and one 18,000-gallon spliVdual UST (10,000/8,000
gallons each) divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. Other associated site improvements
would include a backup ~enerator, perimeter landscaping, a pedestrian plaza at the intersection, a free-
standing sign along the 4 h Street frontage, limited canopy signage, asphalt paving, lot lights, an air/water
unit, a trash enclosure, storage shed and required water quality/stormwater improvements and utility
connections.
Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations
The site is currently zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) and is designated as Commercial Corridor Land Use
(CC) under the City of Renton's current Comprehensive Plan. Surrounding properties are also zoned CA
and contain a variety of traditional retail and commercial office uses. No changes in zoning are being
requested under this proposal.
Existing Use/ Improvements
The project site is vacant, with no structures or other improvements onsite; having served previously as
home to a combination gas station and convenience store. Existing site conditions include broken
asphalt and/or concrete pavement, stone/dirt surfaces and an unplanned landscape of assorted trees
I
1T::-\
• 1 i:=;')
City of Renton
Comprehensive Project Narrative 2
QFC Fuel, er -#871 Renton Highlands
4615 NE 4 Street
(including several prominent dead trees), miscellaneous shrubs and ground cover, located primarily along
the southern and western property lines; providing a degree of separation from adjacent commercial
uses. The site is accessible using driveways from NE 4th Street and Duvall Avenue NE, with a rockery
extending along a portion of the Duvall frontage.
Site Features
The site has an existing grade, generally running from northwest to southeast, with slopes in excess of
five to seven percent (5%-7%) at locations along the eastern and southern perimeter. Our preliminary
plans incorporate the site's physical constraints into the overall project design; maintaining the status quo
-with the exception of an increase in impervious surface, under our proposal, mainly associated with the
pedestrian plaza proposed for the intersection itself. While technically decreasing the pervious surface
onsite, QFC believes the benefits of a planned landscape with coordinated plantings and an integration of
color and species will result in a markedly better visual aesthetic, albeit in a reduced area.
Fuel Center Operations
The QFC Fuel Center's hours of operation will mirror those of the QFC grocery store. While the fuel
center is designed to allow for unattended operation, an attendant will be stationed within the cashier's
kiosk; executing cash payments and/or credit card transactions, monitoring payment-at-the-pump and fuel
deliveries, and observing the fuel facility's operations.
As is the case with all QFC Fuel Centers, the facility will be remotely supervised via security cameras and
a 24/7/365 electronic alarm system, designed to become operational in the event of emergencies such as
fire detection or breach of the inner/outer walls of the tanks or fuel distribution system. A refuse and
recycling area is located in the SW corner of the facility. next to the required backup electrical generator.
Two (2) parking stalls -including one accessible stall -are also provided
Queuing, Circulation and Access
In an effort to provide improved queuing and onsite circulation, the fuel canopy has been rotated
approximately 45-degrees; promoting direct access to the dispensers from both access drives, while
allowing for adequate onsite circulation as customers leave the pump and exit onto adjacent streets
Direct access to adjacent public rights-of-way (4th Street and Duvall) is proposed under the current plan;
essentially maintaining the previous access points, but shifting each of them slightly further away from the
intersection, in accordance with accepted traffic engineering practice. A limited, right-in/ right-out access
is proposed for 4th Street, but without the typical "pork-chop" -while full access is proposed for Duvall.
Fuel delivery protocols and the projected path for fuel trucks dictate full, unobstructed ingress / egress
must be maintained at a minimum of one of the two access drives; removing the "pork-chop" will minimize
maintenance as trucks would likely damage the paving/curbs.
Dedication of Public Rights-of-Way
The project will mandate the dedication of approximately 2,699 square feet of QFC property to provide for
the required right-of-way profile for both NE 4th Street and Duvall Avenue (with dedication split almost
equally between the two rights-of-way). Required perimeter landscaping and sidewalks will be provided
along both frontages, and a pedestrian plaza will be provided at the intersection. The traffic signal will be
relocated to accommodate the new rights-of-way at QFC expense. with the new signal location to be
determined later.
2
City of Renton
Comprehensive Project Narrative
Traffic and Trip Generation
QFC Fu
3
enter -#871 Renton Hi~hlands
4615 NE 41 Street
Using traditional trip generation methodology established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers
(ITE), the traffic impacts associated with a new QFC fuel facility are expected to be nominal. Based on
ITE's methodology, the project is projected to generate 704 total weekday trips and an average of 64 new
trips during the PM peak hours. These are gross trip estimates and do not include credits for the previous
use onsite.
For similar Fred Meyer fuel projects, the City of Renton has historically acknowledged a large number of
fuel customers are drawn from internally captured, pass-by and diverted link trips, relative to the main
retail operation, as opposed to new trips generated by the fuel facility alone; significantly reducing the
number of new trips attributable to the facility. We believe a similar concept should be applied to this
facility, as the number of fuel customers will undoubtedly include a large number of shoppers patronizing
the QFC retail store in the adjacent shopping center.
In addition to trip reductions attributed to internal capture and pass-by trips, a financial credit applicable to
the calculation of traffic impact fees will be forthcoming as well; reflecting the operation of a fuel station
onsite (two dispensers and four fueling positions), as recently as 2007 with the use originating in 1960.
For a more complete discussion of trip generation and traffic impacts, please refer to the attached
transportation impact analysis, prepared by TENW, dated September 10, 2012
Required Permits
With the installation of USTs, the project will require SEPA Environmental Review; and consequently,
under Renton code, the Administrative Site Plan review process. The project site is also located within
Urban Design District 'D' -thereby triggering a secondary design review process
We anticipate the project will require the issuance of building permits (including electrical, mechanical and
plumbing), construction permits, fire engineering permits (including UST installation and tank permits),
grading permit, and sign permits (including related electrical permits) -all from the City of Renton.
Peripheral permits be issued and/or licenses obtained from the Puget Sound Clean Air Authority
(PSCAA), the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries (DL&I) and the Washington State
Department of Ecology (DOE). The City of Renton also reserves the right to inspect and approve all utility
connections/plans undertaken in conjunction with this project.
Proposed Improvements
Aside from right-of-way improvements already discussed, no off-site improvements are anticipated in
conjunction with this proposal. Existing landscaping was significantly altered to accommodate the fuel
facility design. Lacking an existing record landscaping plan, a photographic record and site inventory has
been compiled to document existing landscaping.
All fire hydrants serving the site will be upgraded to current Renton standards for fittings. Fire lanes will
be identified in accordance with City of Renton standards.
A job shack/office trailer will be located onsite during construction; an exact location will be determined
after a general contractor is retained. Typically constructing this size/type of fuel facility requires the
cut/fill of as much as 2,800 cubic yards of material, including asphalt and subsurface soils, during the
installation of the underground storage tanks and the excavation necessary for the construction of
footings and foundations. If the excavated material cannot be utilized onsite, it will be exported to an
3
City of Renton
Comprehensive Project Narrative 4
QFC Fuel I er -#871 Renton Hi~hlands
4615 NE 4 Street
approved offsite location. Clean suitable structural fill will be imported from an approved source, if
necessary.
Modifications
The street profile standards and resulting right-of-way dedications being enforced by the City of Renton in
conjunction with redevelopment of the site, are dictating considerable deviation from the prototype design
of a QFC Fuel Center. Combining these regulatory constraints with the physical constraints of a smaller
site has produced a development scenario requiring modifications to current design standards in order for
this project to be constructed.
Setbacks
The most pronounced observable modification comes in the area of setbacks. The project's operational
requirements mandate a greater separation from the right-of-way/property line than specified by code.
Physically placing the fuel canopy in a location which complied with the required would virtually eliminate
the possibility of vehicle queuing/stacking and eliminate any operational functionality for the use.
However, QFC has modified the design; angling the fuel canopy to bring a portion of it as close as
possible to the maximum setback line, while maintaining full operational capabilities -in an attempt to
address the following criteria:
a) Pedestrian Orientation ... QFC meets the commitment to pedestrian orientation by maintaining
pedestrian access around the perimeter, providing full pedestrian improvements along both
frontages and providing a pedestrian plaza with benches and pedestrian-scale lighting at the
intersection of 41h Street and Duvall Avenue.
Due to the automotive nature of the use and the danger inherent to pedestrians traversing a high-
traffic area with full of visual obstructions (vehicles, pumps, columns, etc.) to their safety,
pedestrian paths have not been provided linking the frontage improvements to the kiosk.
Pedestrian striping has been provided on the site plan in those areas beneath the fuel canopy
most likely to be traversed by pedestrian traffic attempting to access the kiosk from the
dispensers.
b) Architectural Scale ... The fuel canopy is less than 20-feet tall and encourages a smaller-scale
street environment through its minimal height and an angled presentation which eliminates any
intrusion by shadow or mass into the pedestrian space along either frontage. The limited parking
spaces are separated from the right-of-way by landscape buffers and/or a pedestrian plaza;
minimizing visibility from at street level.
c) Visibility and Safety ... The project is designed to prevent hidden spaces as a security factor, and
the maximum utility being realized by this project/use, on this site, assures the safety of
pedestrians as much as possible. Pedestrian traffic is channeled into those areas where their
safety is maximized and potential conflict with the operations of the QFC Fuel Center is
minimized.
d) Pedestrian Plaza Size ... While not linked to this exception criteria by the written word, the need
to address the criteria above has produced a scenario which affects the single largest pedestrian
amenity onsite. The combined setback and landscaping requirements produced a pedestrian
plaza, smaller in size (724 SF) than the minimum 1,000 SF required, but which manages to still
provide the basic amenities associated with such a plaza (seating and lighting) within an area
clearly delineated by textured paving.
4
City of Renton
Comprehensive Project Narrative 5
Stacking Lanes
QFC F; enter -#871 Renton Hi~hlands
4615 NE 41 Street
Renton standards stipulate a minimum stacking capacity of five (5) vehicles within each stacking lane,
serving a dispenser (MPD) and creating a vehicle fueling position (VFP), and that said stacking must not
intrude into or block access drives or parking areas.
A standard QFC fuel canopy design does not have a problem meeting these standards, but on this site,
after accommodating the necessary right-of-way dedications and reorienting the canopy for setback
purposes, the site constraints make compliance a bit problematic. First, the site has a limited frontage;
essentially restricting QFC's ability to shift or relocate driveways and still maintain access for customers
and fuel deliveries. Secondly, the available access locations provide adequate queuing/stacking space,
but only if drivers have multiple options for refueling, thereby minimizing dwell time at the pump, and
reducing the potential for queuing backups.
QFC staff considered multiple layouts, pump configurations, spacing/layout options and their impacts on
queuing/stacking. The most effective option is presented on the plan submitted; using a standard, 5-MPD
configuration, but on a 45-degree angle to the access drives, providing six (6) stacking lanes, serving five
(5) MPDs and each of the ten (10) available VFPs, but also maintain four (4) passing lanes (two beneath
the fuel canopy and one each on the outer edge of the canopy).
This design allows drivers to maneuver to take advantage of an unused VFP, and maintains the
maximum number of VFPs available. The typical transaction takes between four and six minutes to be
completed (dwell time at the pump); thus the combination of more refueling options and easier
accessibility leading to decreased dwell time, equates to less chance of a queuing/stacking problem
developing. In our opinion, this justifies the provision of less stacking s~ace than the code requires and
minimizes any potential interference with driveway access at either the 4' Street or Duvall access drives.
Our conclusions from a design perspective have been confirmed by traffic engineering professionals in
the analysis prepared in conjunction with this application, by TENW, dated September 10, 2012. Their
analysis confirms adequate space for ten (10) vehicles at the MPDs/VFPs, and a stacking capacity of
sixteen (16) vehicles behind those being refueled. In TENW's professional opinion, and based on their
experience with similar facilities, this stacking capacity is adequate and should allow for relatively
unobstructed access to all driveways and parking areas during peak usage.
Landscaping
Renton code requires virtually all areas not subject to public improvements and/or site operations be fully
landscaped; including a 10-foot buffer along street frontages; calculated after right-of-way dedications are
provided for. The quality and unplanned nature of the existing landscaping/vegetation onsite dictated a
completely new landscape plan and a complete replanting of the site, with a resulting loss of pervious,
landscaped area due to the expanded impervious surface area associated with the QFC Fuel Center.
Although Renton's landscape code provides for a quantitative delineation between parking lot landscape
and perimeter landscape, this project's lack of a significant area dedicated exclusively for parking, and the
obvious integration of the two parking stalls provided, into close proximity to the primary use/structures, a
separate calculation for dedicated parking lot landscaping is not realistically possible.
The fuel center's operational requirements combined with the required dedications have produced less
space available for landscaping than is required b~ code. However, QFC's plan does provide the full
landscape buffer along the more heavily traveled 41 Street corridor, while providing a minimal landscape
buffer along Duvall Avenue -although a landscape strip is provided adjacent to the street. Should the
city wish to break the street profile pattern and relocate the sidewalk next to the street, the size of the
buffer could be enhanced. The nature of the plantings and coverage in both buffers will provide a more
aesthetic appearance than currently found onsite, while maintaining a visual separation between the
5
City of Renton
Comprehensive Project Narrative 6
QFC Fuel< er -#871 Renton Hi~hlands
4615 NE 41 Street
streetscape and the use, and thereby meeting the intent of a landscape buffer, albeit in a reduced
manner. When combined with the pedestrian plaza as a focal point, the elements will merge nicely into a
pedestrian system that will serve the neighborhood as well as the site itself.
Refuse and Recycling
Code requirements dictate a minimum area of one hundred (100) square feet shall be provided for refuse
and recycling areas. With a combined area of less than 4,000 SF gross floor area, the project is required
to provide 12 SF of recyclable storage area and 24 SF for refuse deposit areas. As provided, the
enclosure offers approximately 120 SF devoted to the collection/storage of refuse and recyclables;
exceeding the requirement. The nature of the necessary modification is that the design does not provide
for a roof over the enclosure. The front-loading equipment used by our refuse contractor typically
damages any type of overhead roof or overhangs and as such, does not lend itself well to this structure.
Preliminary Project Cost Estimate
The construction costs provided below are preliminary in nature and are subject to change; not included
in these figures are sub-consultant costs (title, geotechnical, traffic, etc.).
Clearance and Erosion Control
Yard Construction
Site Development
Paving & Landscaping
Sewer and Water
Total Estimated Construction Cost
Contingencies (10%)
Permit and Utility Fees
Total
Estimated Market Value of Project
$ 51,000
$ 21,971
$561,068
$ 125,893
$ 15,000
$774,932
$ 77,493
$113,366
$965,791
Using Building Valuation Data and methodology established by the International Code Council (February
2012) for a structure of Type 11-B and Class M Occupancy, the table below illustrates a general estimate;
using the latest figure of $108.40 / SF:
Fuel Canopy (3,360 SF)
Kiosk
Signage
Total
6
$364,224
$ 17,344
$ 25.000
$ 401,568
Landscaping, Lot Coverage & Parking Analysis
Narrative
Submitted in Conjunction with
SEPA Environmental Review and Administrative Site Plan Review
Conducted by the City of Renton,
Department of Community and Economic Development Planning Division
Under the Auspices of the State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA)
Project Name
QFC Fuel Center -#871 Renton Highlands
Project Site
4615 NE 4th Street, Renton WA 98057
QFC Store No. 871 BCE No. 15432.1
Parcel Number 152305-9124
SE:p 2 6 Zit ),;
Project Location
The proposed QFC Fuel Center would be built on a single parcel/corner lot located at 4615 4th Street NE,
Renton WA 98057; immediately adjacent to the intersection of NE 4th Street and Duvall Avenue NE. The
project site is approximately 22,092 square feet and is located in the immediate vicinity of a QFC retail
store and other diverse commercial uses, located approximately 600 feet to the NE, across the
intersection of 4th and Duvall, within an established shopping center.
Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations
The site is currently zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) and is designated as Commercial Corridor Land Use
(CC) under the City of Renton's current Comprehensive Plan. Surrounding properties are also zoned CA
and contain a variety of traditional retail and commercial office uses. No changes in zoning are being
requested under this proposal.
Landscape Analysis
This site has been vacant for over five years; having previously been the site of a retail fuel facility with
limited existing landscaping, primarily located along the southern portion of the site. No record drawings
are available. Therefore, the calculations presented within this section are based on and/or limited to, a
visual/photographic inventory of those portions of the overall site directly incorporated under the above
parcel number.
The project site (-22,092 square feet) features an essentially flat landscape with slopes (5-7%) or grade
separations restricted to the access drives along the N and E perimeter, along NE 4th Street and Duvall
Avenue. The southern portion of the site is an unplanned mixture of trees in varying states of condition
and a densely mixed grow1h of bushes (blackberry), grasses and weeds, gradually descending towards
the southern property line.
Excluding the vegetation along the southern perimeter, the project site is predominantly covered by an
impervious surface in extremely poor condition; a remnant of the previous use, an outdated fuel station
demolished in 2007. Under the QFC proposal, a modern fuel canopy/kiosk structure is being proposed
for a reduced site area (-19,393 SF), the change to the project site's physical attributes due to required
/r)
·'.::./
City of Renton QFC Fuel I er -#871 Renton Hi~hlands
4615 NE 41 Street Topical Project Narrative 2
right-of-way dedications (projected to be 2,699 square feet; including a pedestrian plaza). This will result
in a smaller area of interior and perimeter landscaping; a corresponding decrease in pervious surface
dictated by the demands of the QFC Fuel Center's design constraints.
A pedestrian plaza at the intersection, combined with maximum driveway widths, leaves relatively little
room for landscaping improvements along either street frontage. Existing perimeter landscaping will be
significantly modified to allow adequate maneuvering room for access and accommodate the required
street improvements; minimal landscaping is provided along the Duvall frontage, while a larger area is
provided along the more visible NE 41h Street frontage. Smaller perimeter landscape strips are provided
as a visual buffer along the S and W property lines.
Lot Coverage
The condition of the existing gravel and impervious surface makes an exact calculation of the existing
impervious surface difficult at best. For the purposes of this narrative, the existing impervious surface is
undetermined; the condition of the site making it virtually impossible to accurately calculate. Our
calculations indicate the amount of pervious surface onsite will decrease as a result of the combined
impacts associated with the required frontage improvements, corresponding right-of-way dedications and
design considerations inherent to the operation of a modern fuel center.
Lot Coverage Pre-Development Post-Development Change
QFC Fuel Center Site 22,092 19,393 -14%
Right-of-Way Dedication N/A 2,699 100%
... included in ROW Dedication ... Pedestrian Plaza 724 100%
Total Site 22,092 22,092 ---
Building/Structure Footprints Undetermined 3,494 100%
Paved Drives and Parking Undetermined 13,730 100%
, .. includes generator & refuse/recycling pads
Total Impervious Surface 17,224 88.82%
Landscaping/ Perimeter Undetermined 2,169 100%
Landscaping/ Interior Undetermined 0 0%
Total Landscaped Surface 2,169 11.18%
Parking Analysis
The project site is currently vacant; without a current, specific use for comparison, a tabular presentation
is impossible to formulate and assess changes in parking demand.
The QFC proposal calls for a 3,360 SF fuel canopy and a 120 SF cashier's kiosk. With stacking space for
4-5 vehicles per stacking lane within the canopy's maneuvering area and the provision of two (2)
employee parking stalls (one accessible stall), we believe this project fulfills the intent of the City of
Renton's parking code.
Construction Mitigation Narrative
Submitted in Conjunction with
SEPA Environmental Review and Administrative Site Plan Review
Conducted by the City of Renton,
Department of Community and Economic Development Planning Division
Under the Auspices of the State Environ mental Protection Act (SEPA)
Project Name
QFC Fuel Center -#871 Renton Highlands:it/ 01 ~·: ,";,:.,;1
Project Site
4615 NE 4th Street, Renton WA 98057
QFC Store No. 871 BCE No. 15432.1
Parcel Number 152305-9124
Construction Schedule
Assuming the plan review process proceeds normally, construction of the fueling facility is
anticipated to begin on or about March 1, 2013. Construction of similar QFC fuel facilities has
historically required between ten (10) to twelve (12) weeks. Allowing for contingencies, QFC
anticipates construction will conclude on or about June 1, 2013.
Hours of Operation
Following a traditional workday schedule, construction is expected to commence no earlier than
7:00 AM and conclude no later than 5:00 PM. No construction activity will be required on
Saturdays, Sundays or holidays. Adequate parking is available onsite for construction workers
and if necessary, in the nearby QFC parking lot..
Hauling/Transportation Routes
Vehicles and equipment involved in the demolition and construction phases of the project will be
required to utilize adjacent public rights-of-way, specifically NE 4th Street, when en route to or
from the construction site. Construction vehicles may utilize that portion of Duvall Avenue which
extends south from the intersection, to access the southern perimeter of the site.
Traffic Control Plan
Despite the site's location at an intersection within a commercial corridor, we do not anticipate
any significant traffic impacts to be generated by the construction of the fueling facility, aside
from improvements specifically linked to the required street dedications and signal relocation.
As part of the construction permit process, QFC will coordinate the preparation of a traffic
control plan based on Renton staff input and prepared by a qualified contractor.
Following best management practices associated with construction sites, the site will be fenced
as a security and safety measure during site clearing/preparation and construction of the facility.
City of Renton
Construction Narrative 2
QFC Fuel er -#871 Renton Highlands
4615 NE 4 Street
Onsite Mitigation Measures
Specific mitigation measures are discussed detailed in the SEPA Environmental Checklist, but a
general summary of possible impacts and proposed mitigation is presented in the table below:
Impact Mitigation
,::
oa ~ A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan {TESC) will be implemented to manage ,:: .s stormwater runoff; beginning with site preparation and land clearing and concluding upon the 0,:: ·-.. :g E completion of the project, or when the potential for erosion has passed.
~ ·-w -g
"'
"" .. No light or glare is expected to occur as a result of construction activity. :E ~ c,-
:J (!)
.. Existing driveways will be utilized and improved to provide adequate access to the site . .. Construction equipment and vehicles will be restricted to the use of adjacent principal arterials, ..
" NE 41" Street and/or a limited portion of Duvall Avenue, to access the site. " <(
The impacts of emissions upon air quality are expected to be minimal; emanating from
construction equipment initially, and later, on a more permanent basis, from future vehicle
traffic. These impacts are mitigated through efficient design of the facility, the number of fueling
~ positions, adequate vehicle queuing and overall site circulation. State-of-the-art vapor recovery
<ii equipment will work to recapture/contain escaping vapors throughout the fuel delivery system. :,
0
~ Minimal levels of airborne dust particles may be realized during the excavation/filling processes
accompanying construction. These impacts will be fully addressed by the measures outlined in
theTESC.
Erosion controls will be maintained throughout construction in accordance with the provisions of
:.
the TESC plan. Stormwater runoff will be collected and discharged to the existing stormwater
1ii system, at the existing point of discharge.
l Once the facility becomes operational, onsite stormwater management proposes to separate
£ under-canopy runoff, pre-treat with an oil/water separator and then be discharged into the "' sanitary sewer.
Short-term sources of noise pollution will originate from the use of construction equipment and
will vary in their frequency and intensity. Maximum noise levels can typically be expected to .. range between 72-to 90-decibels, as measured from a distance of 50-feet away from the .. source. These impacts will be of limited duration and mitigated, to the extent possible, through ·o z the use and maintenance of efficient muffiers and noise abatement devices on construction
vehicles and equipment.
PLANNING DIVISION
DESIGN DISTRICT "D " CHECKLIST
City of Renton Planning Division
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057
Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 SEP. 2 6 101,
-:___:/'
PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST:
.r-·1; : ~:; \.~--· i :-
Ensure compliance with design review regulations located In the Renton Municipal Code in order to:
a. Maintain and protect property values;
b. Enhance the general appearance of the City;
c. Encourage creativity In building and site design;
d. Achieve predictability, balanced with flexibility; and
e. Consider the Individual merits of proposals.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS:
This design district checklist asks you to describe some basic Information about your proposal. The City
will use this checklist to determine whether the proposal complies with the Urban Design Regulations In
the Renton Municipal Code (RMC 4-3-100).
There are two categories that have been established: (a) "minimum standards" that must be met, and
(b) "guidelines" that, while not mandatory, are considered by the Planning Director In determining if the
proposed action meets the intent of the design guidelines If the standard cannot be met.
Please describe how your proposal meets each standard. If you are not able to meet the standard,
please describe how the proposal meets the Intent and guidelines of the applicable section.
If a question does not apply to your proposal, write "does not apply". Complete answers may avoid
unnecessary delays In the processing of your review.
•Guidelines-: bevelt>pme·nts sh.al Len.ha nee th!! mulual relat1t>nship Of buUdirigs Witn. ¢ath Other, asweli a_s··· -
.with the ro~ds; o -en.S ace,arid peclestri~nimenJties while wcirking:1:0 create a•. desfrlan oriented . .
.envf ronrnent Lots sha lfl:iecanfig!lred.tt1.e!')l;o!)rngevariety ancfso1hat nawra.l llgl!ti~ availableto • ...•.
bufidTn i.a°ndi> J!Jl.S ~~i;:rtie·'·rly~c·bfln/:lMdoa1sJn reift1ti:n}iafii.ses shaUbe ·rovidedfor .. ·.. . .
Standard: The availability of natural light (both direct and reflected) and direct sun exposure to nearby
buildin sand open s ace (except parking areas) shall be considered when siting structures.
The fuel canopy design and centralized. angled site placement allows for full visual continuity; allowing sunlight to diffuse beneath
the canopy while maintaining or increasing existing levels of solar exposure for adjacent properties as designed perimeter
landscaping replaces the uncontrolled plant growth/tree coverage currently exhibited on·site.
Standard: Buildings shall be oriented to the street with clear connections to the sidewalk.
he project is designed with access to the fuel canopy oriented towards the two access driveways. The automotive nature of the
use dictates that pedestrian access to the fuel canopy be discouraged as a matter of public safety. A pedestrian plaza is provided;
connecting directly with the public sidewalk on 4th Street and Duvall Avenue.
Standard: The front entry of a building shall be oriented to the street or a landscaped pedestrian-only
courtyard.
The vehicular entry is oriented to provide access from the rights·of-way, without creating interference with ingress/egress or
blocking access to parking areas. Pedestrian access is channeled around vehicle maneuvering areas.
Standard: Buildings with residential uses located at the street level shall be set back from the sidewalk a
minimum of ten feet (10') and feature substantial landscaping between the sidewalk and the building or
Have the round floor residential uses raised above street level for residents' privacy.
Not Applicable
·~]i!l~ll~$".il'ami(y entdes snaff ta.ralhe'str:~.";S~rye:is a/ot.i i·pc;,tntiar\!l .alWwsi>acefirrsoclaW c:· .. ·
interact1lin.'Alf¢ntri~nti~.ll .. in~[ui1e}~awr~sJ!i~t ma'kei:herireasfly lder\lifiable::wii11e..riflecti,nglh.~:-~~,:: .
'..~r~!l.lte£t~ral£h~r~cteroftne·6uildin'girtie·pritnar,l ~lltfV$!)~JEbi}K~IT!QSf\1isuallypromineritentry;
·eeaest('la0 ac~ess ~o thfbtiiiding fro.rri. ttie•sioewa.lli=;parking lots,.an~/Qr.ot/l~ia re"as:Shall lie pr:oyic!ed .::::
~nd~fian'enh'anc£tlie overall qtralitv~ft~e 11~.ii~tri~.ii~xiii.ri~nce oiftHe•slfe. · . .. " ,. .. .
Standard: A primary entrance of each building shall be located on the facade facing a street, shall be
prominent, visible from the street, connected by a walkway to the public sidewalk, and indude human-
scale elements.
The fuel canopy "entrances" are oriented towards the access driveways; no typical building entry exists.
Standard: A primary entrance of each building shall be made visibly prominent by incorporating
architectural features such as a facade overhan , trellis, lar e entry doors, and/or ornamental lightin .
The fuel canopy is the predominant architectural feature onsite; vehicular entrances are well defined and pedestrian access
channeled to the sidewalks along the adjacent frontage.
Standard Building entries from a street shall be clearly marked with canopies, architectural elements,
ornamental lighting, or landscaping and Include weather protection at least four and one-half feet (4-
1/2') wide (illustration below). Buildings that are taller than thirty feet (30') in height shall also ensure
that the weather rtional to the distance above round level.
Not Applicable
Standard: Bulldin entries from a parking lot shall be subordinate to those related to the street.
The entry doors to the kiosk and to the rest room (employees only; limited customer access to rest room) are subordinate in
nature.
Standard: Features such as entries, lobbies, and display windows shall be oriented to a street or
destrian-oriented space; otherwise, screenin or decorative features should be incorporated.
The kiosk windows are oriented to provide required visual surveillance of the fuel islands.
Standard: Multiple buildings on the same site shall direct views to building entries by providing a
continuous network of pedestrian paths and opens aces that incorporate landsca ing.
Not Applicable
Standard: Ground floor residential units that are directly accessible from the street shall include entries
from front yards to provide transition space from the street or entries from an open space such as a
ard or arden that is accessible from the street.
Not Applicable
GulcleJt~~Careru1slffng-and-des1gn•treatmi!ntshijll._l>Eftlse~•tQachleve:aJ:~tnl)~tlble_t,~ll~!iQllY!'.h~re-
_n!fw-l>uildiil .. ·(l!ffer3_1J)]n_$_Y!:1'."1)1111diJI i!11iii:ilopm_e_iiffii terms ofbui@lll ··fief h( 6U:ik~aiJdJcalec/·"cJ':',cL
Standard: At least one of the following design elements shall be used to promote a transition to
surrounding uses:
1) Building proportions, including step-backs on upper levels in accordance with the surrounding
planned and existing land use forms; or
2) Building artkulation to divide a larger architectural element into smaller increments; or
3) Roof lines, roof pitches, and roof shapes designed to reduce apparent bulk and transition with
existing development.
Additionally, the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economk Development or
designee may require increased setbacks at the side or rear of a building in order to reduce the bulk and
scale of la er buildings and/or so that sunli ht reaches adjacent and/or abutting ards.
Fuel canopy design limitations restrict the use of articulation or modulation on a smaller canopy; the roof line/pitch correlates well
with those of surrounding structures, to the extent they are visible from the project site.
· Guid!!llnes:SeJVic.e_ elem~6tlf'sh~H:~,toiice_11irated and locatedsothat.irripacts.to:pedestrians.andothe.r
ahutting"uses are mloimizecl:Tlie··1mpa&_of_sei:iiice el¢lllents-shaH_i,~_rt1i~igatedwTtfi:far1ds:iaiiing aiidan•
e11dosurewithfeilcin -tiiafls-madeof tialitil\ateria-K' :i -· . --
Standard: Service elements shall be located and designed to minimize the im acts on the pedestrian
environment and adjacent and/or abutting uses. Service elements shall be concentrated and located
where they are accessible to service vehicles and convenient for tenant use.
Service elements (trash enclosure. storage shed and generator) have been relegated to the SW comer of the site, and enclosed
or screened from view: minimizing visual observation from rights-of-way and maneuvering areas, while retaining full functionality.
Standard: In addition to standard enclosure requirements, garbage, recycling collection, and utility areas
shall be enclosed on all sides, Including the roof and screened around their perimeter by a wall or fence
and have self-closing doors.
The nature and size of the facilities are minimized: enclosure and screening is provided. These facilities are located within the
far corner of the facility; effectively limiting any visual contact from the rights-of-way.
,, ________________________________ _:_ ______ -I
Standard: Service enclosures shall be made of masonry, ornamental metal or wood, or some
combination of the three (3 ).
Refuse and recycling enclosures consist of CMU block: our design does allow adequate space for the use of chain link fence
wlprivacy slats.
Standard: If the service area is adjacent to a street, pathway, or pedestrian-oriented space, a landscaped
planting strip, minimum three feet (3') wide, shall be located on three (3) sides of such facility.
Not Applicable.
Guldelli'le~:-.Oeveloprnentttrat OCCllrS~at gateways shollldJ:,e di~tl11gljlstied with _features .that 11js~11y:·-~
Indicate. to both pedestri~nfl!ncl :Vehicular traffic the ·uniqueness-and pr~mii\e,nce of their locatlonsin • .
the City. Exafnples oftfrese t ~soffeafores Include monuments; ublic art, and pubiiq>iazas.-·--~---··
Standard: Developments located at district gateways shall be marked with visually rominent features.
Not Applicable
Standard: Gateway elements shall be oriented toward and scaled for both pedestrians and vehicles.
Not Applicable.
Standard: Visual prominence shall be distinguished by two (2) or more of the following:
1) Public art;
2) Special landscape treatment;
C Qpen space/plaza; >
4) Land rk building form;
pecial pavin ique pedestrian scale lightin(gr bollardsi '.>
6) Prommen architectural features (trellis, arbor, pergola, or gazebo);
7) Neighborhood or district entry Identification (commercial si ns do not qualify).
Items circled • are provided. The use of lighted bollards will provide a more personal scale of lighting within the plaza.
;i~i~tii;~~~l~!t~f~:~Ji~~E~~l,~1
Guidelines: Surface parking shall be located and designed so as to recluce the visual illlpact ofthe ·
parking area and associated vehicles. Large areas of surface parking shall also be designed to
accommodate future inffO development.
Standard: Parking shall be located so that no surface parking is located between a building and the front
pr<>perty line, or the building and side property line, on the street side of a corner lot.
Spaces are separated by landscaping along the 4th Street frontage, and/or isolated, away from the perimeter, in the far SW
corner of the site.
Standard: Parking shall be located so that it is screened from surrounding streets by buildings,
landscaping, and/or gateway features as dictated by location.
Spaces are separated by landscaping along the 4th Street frontage, and/or isolated, away from the perimeter, in the far SW comer
of the site.
Guidelin_es:_ l'ark1ng gara~es shall not dominate the stree_tScajle;they shall be designecJ. to be
complementary with adj~_ce_l)t aod abutUng buildings. Thev.sh~II be sited to complement; not : _
subordinate, pedestrian entries. Similar forms, materials, a11d/or·details tothe primary building(s).
should be used to enhance garages ..
Standard: Parking structures shall provide space for ground floor commercial uses along street frontages
at a minimum of seventy five percent (75%) of the building frontage width.
Not Applicable
Standard: The entire facade must feature a pedestrian-oriented facade. The Administrator of the
Department of Community and Economic Development may approve parking structures that do not
feature a pedestrian orientation in limited circumstances. tf allowed, the structure shall be set back at
least six feet (6') from the sidewalk and feature substantial landscaping. This landscaping shall include a
combination of evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs, and ground cover. This setback shall be
increased to ten feet (10') when abutting a primary arterial and/or minor arterial.
Not Applicable
Standard: Public facing facades shall be articulated by arches, lintels, masonry trim, or other
architectural elements and/or materials.
Not Applicable
Standard: The entry to the parking garage shall be located away from the primary street, to either the
side or rear of the building.
Not Applicable
Standard: Parking garages at grade shall include screening or be enclosed from view with treatment
such as walls, decorative grilles, trellis with landscaping, or a combination of treatments.
Not Applicable
Standard: The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee
may allow a reduced setback where the applicant can successfully demonstrate that the landscaped
area and/or other design treatment meets the intent of these standards and guidelines. Possible
treatments to reduce the setback include landscaping components plus one or more of the following
integrated with the architectural design of the building:
1) Ornamental grillwork (other than vertical bars);
2) Decorative artwork;
3) Display windows;
4) Brick, tile, or stone;
5) Pre-cast decorative panels;
6} Vine-covered trellis;
7) Raised landscaping beds with decorative materials; or
8) Other treatments that meet the Intent of this standard.
Not Applicable
. Gilidelines:llehlcular.aciess.to parking garage~ and parking lq~ slraD-r\ot impede Or interrupt
pedestrian mobility. The.impacts of curb cuts to pedestrian access"iih:Sfiiiwalks"stiall be minimized.a: ....
Standard: Access to parking lots and garages shall be from alleys, when available. If not available, access
shall occur at side streets.
Minimal driveway access points are provided at two locations; one on each right-of-way. Separate access to a dedicated parking
area is not utilized on this site plan.
Standard: The number of driveways and curb cuts shall be minimized, so that pedestrian circulation
along the sidewalk is minimally impeded.
The number of curb cuts is the minimum necessary to provide the level of access required by the fuel facility.
ar,.:11t•:c··,·~=·-... ~-
Guldelines: The pedestrian elivironment:shall be given priority and import_ance in the design of projects.
Sidewalks and/or pathways shall be provided and shall proir1cle sa_fe accessto buildings from parking ___ -·_
areas. Providing pedestrian connections to abutting properties_is_a_n in,pqrtant aspect ofconnectivity
and encourages pedestria-nadivity and shafrbe considered. Pathways shall be easily identifiable fo ..
pedestrians and drivers._
Standard: A pedestrian circulation system of pathways that are clearly delineated and connect buildings,
open space, and parking areas with the sidewalk system and abutting properties shall be provided.
a. Pathways shall be located so that there are clear sight lines, to increase safety.
b. Pathways shall be an all-weather or permeable walking surface, unless the applicant can
demonstrate that the proposed surface is appropriate for the anticipated number of users and
complementary to the design of the development.
Pedestrian access through maneuvering areas of a fuel station is discouraged. Pedestrian access to the site is channeled
through the pedestrian plaza, where pedestrian amenities are provided.
Standard: Pathways within parking areas shall be provided and differentiated by material or texture
(i.e., raised walkway, stamped concrete, or pavers) from abutting paving materials. Permeable materials
are encouraged. The pathways shall be perpendicular to the applicable building facade and no greater
than one hundred fift feet (150') apart.
Separate, dedicated parking areas are not utilized; the proximity of the stalls provided dictates their treatment as an integral part
of the fuel canopy's operational area. Pedestrian paths are marked beneath the fuel canopy; see architectural details.
Standard: Sidewalks and pathways along the facades of buildings shall be of sufficient width to
accommodate anticipated numbers of users. Specifically:
a. Sidewalks and pathways along the facades of mixed use and retail buildings one hundred
(100) or more feet in width (measured along the facade} shall provide sidewalks at least
twelve feet (12'} in width. The pathway shall include an eight-foot (8') minimum unobstructed
walking surface.
b. Interior pathways shall be provided and shall vary in width to establish a hierarchy. The widths
shall be based on the intended number of users; to be no smaller than five feet (5'} and no
greater than twelve feet (12'}.
Not Applicable; no pathways are located along fuel canopy facades. Pedestrian paths are delineated beneath the canopy to
provide for customer safety as they approach the kiosk.
----------------------------------------------I
Standard: Mid-block connections between buildings shall be rovided.
Not Applicable
tt®iict,atttvtr@i-uhdji-,
Guldelines: _The p'eilesfflan 'environment shall be given priorlty.rnd Im
Amenities ttiat gri<X>iir.f epedestrtan use and enhance the pedestrian e_xpenence shall be included:
Standard: Architectural elements that incorporate plants, particularly at building entrances, in publicly
accessible spaces and at facades along streets, shall be provided.
Lacking an entry for pedestrians on the streets, the facility provides the required improvements along the frontage and makes
every possible effort, given the site constraints, to provide adequate landscaping separating sidewalk from use.
Standard: Amenities such as outdoor group seating, benches, transit shelters, fountains, and public art
shall be provided.
a. Site furniture shall be made of durable, vandal-and weather-resistant materials that do not
retain rainwater and can be reasonably maintained over an extended period of time.
b. Site furniture and amenities shall not impede or block pedestrian access to public spaces or
buildin entrances.
Site furniture (metal/wood benches) and pedestrian-scale lighting (bollards) are provided; space dictates the placement and
amount of amenities provided.
Standard: Pedestrian overhead weather protection In the form of awnings, marquees, canopies, or
building overhangs shall be provided. These elements shall be a minimum of four and one-half feet (4-
1/2') wide along at least seventy five percent (75%) of the length of the building facade facing the street,
a maximum height of fifteen feet (15') above the ground elevation, and no lower than eight feet (8')
above round level.
None provided; not applicable.
G11.ldelLne~(l)evelopinenlslocated·a.t streeti~J~rsectionsshotild _·provide 11~destrian'orientedspace _a!::~ ·
the street corner to ei_nphasj~ pedestrian activity (iQustii!tRJ_J1:(ielow):Recreation a_nd_<:ornmCiffopen __ .
space·areas afeintegral aspects.of quality.development thateriCouragef>E!flestriaris and users .. Tli_eJe ·
areas shall be provided}il.ari amount that is adequate fo be fonctiorial aridusable;Jhey shall also'be .
lan·ilscaped and located so that they areappealing to users an,fpedestriarK.
Standard: All mixed use residential and attached housing developments of ten (10) or more dwelling
units shall provide common opens space and/or recreation areas. t----~-----~~-~--~--------------~----"·-------1
Not Applicable
Standard: Amount of common space or recreation area to be provided: at minimum fifty (50) square
feet per unit.
Not Applicable
Standard: The location, layout, and proposed type of common space or recreation area shall be subject
to approval by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or
designee.
Standard: At least one of the following shall be provided in each open space and/or recreation area (the
Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee may require
more than one of the following elements for developments having more than one hundred (100) units):
1) Courtyards, plazas, or multi-purpose open spaces;
2) Upper level common decks, patios, terraces, or roof gardens/pea-patches. Such spaces above the
street level must feature views or amenities that are unique to the site and are provided as an asset
to the development;
3) Pedestrian corridors dedicated to passive recreation and separate from the public street system;
4) Recreation facilities including, but not limited to, tennis/sports courts, swimming pools, exercise
areas, game rooms, or other similar facilities; or
5) Children's play spaces that are centrally located near a majority of dwelling units and visible from
surrounding units. They shall also be located away from hazardous areas such as garbage
dumpsters, drainage facilities, and parking areas.
Not Applicable
Standard: The following shall not be counted toward the common open space or recreation area
requirement:
1) Required landscaping, driveways, parking, or other vehicular use areas;
2) Required yard setback areas. Except for areas that are developed as private or semi-private (from
abutting or adjacent properties) courtyards, plazas or passive use areas containing landscaping and
fencing sufficient to create a fully usable area accessible to all residents of the development;
3) Private decks, balconies, and private ground floor open space; and
4) Other required landscaping and sensitive area buffers without common access links, such as
oedestrian trails.
Not Applicable
Standard: All buildings and developments with over thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of
nonresidential uses (excludes parking garage floorplate areas) shall provide pedestrian-oriented space.
Not Applicable
Standard: All buildings and developments with over thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of
nonresidential uses (excludes parking garage floorplate areas) shall provide pedestrian-oriented soace.
Not Applicable
Standard: The pedestrian-oriented space for buildings and developments with over thirty thousand
(30,000) square feet of nonresidential uses shall include all of the following:
1) Visual and pedestrian access (including barrier-free access) to the abutting structures from the
public right-of-way or a nonvehlcular courtyard; and
2) Paved walking surfaces of either concrete or approved unit paving; and
3) On-site or building-mounted lighting providing at least four (4) foot-candles (average) on the
ground;and
4) At least three (3) lineal feet of seating area (bench, ledge, etc.) or one individual seat per sixty (60)
square feet of plaza area or open space.
Not Applicable
Standard: The following areas shall not count as pedestrian-oriented space for buildings and
developments with over thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of nonresidential uses:
1) The minimum required walkway. However, where walkways are widened or enhanced beyond
minimum requirements, the area may count as pedestrian-oriented space if the Administrator of
the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee determines such space
meets the definition of pedestrian-oriented space.
2) Areas that abut landscaped parking lots, chain link fences, blank walls, and/or dumpsters or service
areas.
Not Applicable
Standard: Outdoor storage (shopping carts, potting soil bags, firewood, etc.) is prohibited within
pedestrian-oriented space.
Project complies; no outdoor storage is specified.
Standard: At each corner of the intersections listed below, a public plaza shall be provided:
1) Benson Area: Benson Drive S./108th Avenue S.E. and S.E. 176111•
2) Bronson Area: Intersections with Bronson Way North at:
a) Factory Avenue N./Houser Way S.;
b) Garden Avenue N.; and
c) Park Avenue N. and N. First Street.
3) cascade Area: Intersection of 116th Avenue S.E. and S.E. 168th Street.
4) Northeast Fourth Area: Intersections with N.E. Fourth at:
a) Duvall Avenue N.E.;
b) Monroe Avenue N.E.; and
c) Union Avenue N.E.
5) Grady Area: Intersections with Grady Way at:
a) Lind Avenue S.W.;
b) Rainier Avenue S.;
c) Shattuck Avenue S.; and
d) Talbot Road S.
6) Puget Area: Intersection ofS. Puget Drive and Benson Road S.
7) Rainier Avenue Area: Intersections with Rainier Avenue S. at:
a) Airport Way/Renton Avenue S.;
b) S. Third Street/S.W. Sunset Boulevard;
c) s. Fourth Street; and
d) S. Seventh Street.
8) North Renton Area: Intersections with Park Avenue N. at:
a) N. Fourth Street; and
b) N. Fifth Street.
9) Northeast Sunset Area: Intersections with N.E. Sunset Boulevard at:
a) Duvall Avenue N.E.; and
b) Union Avenue N.E.
Project complies.
Standard: The public plaza shall measure no less than one thousand (1,000) square feet with a minimum
dimension of twent feet (20'} on one side abutting th_e_s_id_e_w_a_lk_. _____________ __,
A smaller pedestrian plaza is provided; integrated into the required ROW dedications and landscape strip, while providing the
amenities required by the city.
Standard: The public plaza must be landscaped consistent with RMC 4-4-070, including at minimum
street trees, decorative paving, pedestrian-scaled lighting, and seating.
The plaza design places a priority on pedestrian amenities (benches, paving, illuminated bollards), framed by landscaped buffers
and street trees. The signal relocation process will impact the final plaza design and will require further discussion w/staff.
·Guidelines: Buililingfacades shall be modulated ancl/or art.iculatedct<i reclutetlie appar nt,size of
b·uildi!lgs: breakup lorigblaril<waiis; acid visual interest, arid enha_ncethecbaracter oflhe -__ ' -
neighborhood: Articuiation; rriodulation;and their intervals shouldcreate a sense:ofstale important to _ __c
residentiaLbuildings. :-:-::~ -----. -. . -. ----
Standard: All building facades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no more than forty
feet (40').
The design of the fuel canopy provides visual modulations through the use of cclor. The angled presentation to the frontage
provides a contrasting visual aesthetic with the parallel visuals offered by adjacent structures
Standard: Modulations shall be a minimum of two feet (2') deep, sixteen feet (16') in height, and eight
feet (8') in width.
The functional, simplified design of the fuel canopy is dictated by the need for ccnsistently focused, diffused lighting, directed
downwards, towards fueling posrrions. Modulation cculd result in unnecessary glare/spillover onto adjacent rights-of-way.
Standard: Buildings greater than one hundred sixty feet (160') in length shall provide a variety of
modulations and articulations to reduce the apparent bulk and scale of the facade (illustration in District
B, below); or provide an additional special feature such as a clock tower, courtyard, fountain, or public
gathering area.
Not Applicable
Guldelloes: Tlte:t1sfoflnateriai variatiorissuch as rolors;_l>rick;•shingfes;:stucco, .and.horiiontalWood·· • C.
· $i~i11g ifenc;ouragecCllie primary building ehfrance should be m~d(vJilbfy'prominent byJn<:orporatiog --~
atchitec.tOral featuressJth=asa facade overhang, treiji.5,Jargeenttydo())"$Jllll~/orofnamental lighting C
(jllus}raH011·below),· Detail features should also be used,to inc:.fJJJ;t~ffiirigs such'asdecoraWeeritrv= -":
paving, streetiuroiture.{behches, etc.), and/or public art. . ·--c-~ .. , ..... ----. -----. ··~ ~· ~'~
Standard: Human-scaled elements such as a lighting fixture, trellis, or other landscape feature shall be
provided along the facade's ground floor.
Not Applicable to the project as a whole; pedestrian scale lighting (bollards) is provided in the pedestrian plaza.
Standard: On any facade visible to the public, transparent windows and/or doors are required to
comprise at least fifty percent (50%) of the portion of the ground floor facade that is between four feet
(4') and eight feet (8') above ground (as measured on the true elevation).
Kiosk is compliant along front and side watts (partial), but fuel canopy lacks doors or windows.
Standard: Upper portions of building facades shall have clear windows with visibility into and out of the
building. However, screening may be applied to provide shade and energy efficiency. The minimum
amount of light transmittance for windows shall be fifty percent (50%).
Not Applicable
Standard: Display windows shall be designed for frequent change of merchandise, rather than
permanent displays.
Not Applicable
Standard: Where windows or storefronts occur, they must principally contain clear glazing.
Compliant.
Standard: Tinted and dark glass, highly reflective (mirror-tvoe) glass and film are prohibited.
Compliant.
Standard: Untreated blank walls visible from public streets, sidewalks, or interior pedestrian pathways
are prohibited.
1) A wall (including building facades and retaining walls) is considered a blank wall if:
a) It is a ground floor wall or portion of a ground floor wall over six feet {6') in height, has a
horizontal length greater than fifteen feet (15'), and does not include a window, door, building
modulation or other architectural detailing; or
b) Any portion ofa ground floor wall has a surface area of four hundred (400) square feet or
greater and does not include a window, door, building modulation or other architectural
detailing.
Not Applicable
Standard: If blank walls are required or unavoidable, they shall be treated. The treatment shall be
proportional to the wall and use one or more of the following:
1) A planting bed at least five feet (5') in width containing trees, shrubs, evergreen ground cover, or
vines abutting the blank wall;
2) Trellis or other vine supports with evergreen climbing vines;
3) Architectural detailing such as reveals, contrasting materials, or other special detailing that meets
the intent of this standard;
Artwork, such as bas-relief sculpture, mural, or similar; or
Seating area with special paving and seasonal planting.
ii.' -==·®~-::;" =::;
Guldellnesi Buffdin"gro§fttnes shall be varied and incl11cl_t! ar:chJtectiiraf elernents tc, __ adcl visuarinterest:to
the building. ·
Standard: At least one of the following elements shall be used to create varied and interesting roof
profiles:
1) Extended parapets;
2) Feature elements projecting above parapets;
3) Projected cornices; and/or
4) Pitched or sloped roofs.
S) Roof mounted mechanical equipment shall not be visible to pedestrians
6) Buildings containing predominantly residential uses shall have pitched roofs with a minimum slope
of one to four (1:4) and shall have dormers or interesting roof forms that break up the massiveness
of an uninterrupted slo ing roof.
Not Applicable. Equipment on roof of kiosk will be fully screened.
, _ · ... ;,_JI~ :m eres, .
GuldelJnes: Buildiog materials°arean Important aiid'integra[part_o[Jhe architej:turaldesign of a liuil_ding
that is attractive arid.ofliign quality:Material variation shall be usedtocreate vls~_al appeal and --
eliminate moriotony"iitt.foacies.This shall occur on all facadesjriaconsistent manner. High quality
:materials shall be usedilf.materials like coricreteor block walls areuse.d. they shall be enhanced to·
create variation and enharicetheirvisual a --al: -. -
Standard: All sides of buildings visible from a street, pathway, parking area, or open space shall be
finished with the same building materials, detailing, and color scheme. A different treatment may be
used if the materials are of the same quality.
Compliant
Standard: All buildings shall use material variations such as colors, brick or metal banding, patterns or
textural changes.
Compliant
Standard: Materials shall be durable, high quality, and consistent with more traditional urban
development, such as brick, integrally colored concrete masonry, pre-finished metal, stone, steel, glass
and cast-in-place concrete.
Compliant; materials used include textured concrete masonry block, pre-finished metal, steel and glass.
Standard: If concrete is used, walls shall be enhanced by techniques such as texturing, reveals, and/or
colorin with a concrete coatin or admixture.
Textured block is used.
Standard: If concrete block walls are used, they shall be enhanced with Integral color, textured blocks
and colored mortar, decorative bond attern and/or shall lncor rate other mason materials.
Compliant.
Standard: All buildings shall use material variations such as colors, brick or metal banding, patterns, or
textural changes.
Compliant; fuel canopy and kiosk both utilize horizontal color stripes with contrasting colors.
:.Guldeliries:Front-lit, grouJid-,nuunred lTIOIIU01e11rsJgnsare"tbi:p[efe~# typf qffreestijndlrigJlgn::.~7
Blade type signs; proli°ortiooalto,the liuilding t,i¢ade,01J which they are mountei( are.encourage<! on .c.-•·
pet1estr1an,orflntedstreetr;Tterat1onoftrailerri.~~.nsii¥1i!li~riding,-corporates1gna°iistie>u1d·nof6[:
g~rlsh ll'lcblof riofpveri{lit; aithotigh cti1atiy!i'tfeslgri;'strong'accenn;olois;'ii°nd ·li,teres'.tlngsU:ffllce·= ..
·materials andJi hung tectiniques are encoura°gecL ... -. . -·~=:-=..:c~~-··-=~· ----.
Standard: Signage shall be an integral part of the design approach to the building.
Signage is minimalized on the fuel canopy and kiosk itself; this project is using less signage than typically used on QFC fuel
projects; a small, monument sign is proposed for NE 4th Street which is compliant with code requirements.
Standard: Entry signs shall be limited to the name of the larger development.
Not Applicable
Standard: Cor orate logos and signs shall be sized ap
Compliant
Standard: In mixed use and multi-use buildings, signage shall be coordinated with the overall building
design.
'
Standard: Freestanding ground-related monument signs. with the exception of primary entry signs. shall
be limited to five feet (5') above finished grade. including support structure. All such signs shall include
decorative landscaping (ground cover and/or shrubs) to provide seasonal interest in the area
surrounding the sign. Alternately. signage may incorporate stone. brick. or other decorative materials as
approved by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or
designee.
Compliant; proposed signage will be less that 5' tall and present a minimal corporate logo with price information.
Standard: All of the following are prohibited:
1) Pole signs;
2) Roof signs; and
3) Back-lit signs with letters or graphics on a plastic sheet (can signs or illuminated cabinet signs).
Exceptions: Back-lit logo signs less than ten (10) square feet are permitted. as are signs with only the
individual letters back-lit.
Compliant; logos are compliant in size and illuminated channel letters are used for text. Price signs are scrolling readerboards
with pricing adjusted electronically· no advertising or text is provided except for product identification (unleaded, premium, etc.)
~J)id¢H~es'._li~~}ing thatjlTlpf<ilii!S ~d~sirians)ifety and;als_oth~.f~reafes visual inte(eSt In th~_btillding •..
and site durin~ the eveninli-tiours shall be:provided. · . . --. ·----···. . -· ---·· · --~
Standard: Pedestrian-scale lighting shall be provided at primary and secondary building entrances.
Examples include sconces on building facades. awnings with down-lighting and decorative street
lighting.
Compliant.
Standard: Accent lighting shall also be provided on building facades (such as sconces) and/or to
illuminate other key elements of the site such as gateways. specimen trees, other significant
landscaping, water features. and/or artwork.
Not Applicable
Standard: Downlighting shall be used in all cases to assure safe pedestrian and vehicular movement.
unless alternative pedestrian scale lighting has been approved administratively or Is specifically listed as
exempt from provisions located in RMC 4-4-075. Lighting. Exterior On-Site (i.e., signage, governmental
flags, temporary holiday or decorative lighting, right-of-way-lighting. etc.).
Compliant; all lighting fixtures used onsite are recessed or cut-off, with light focused down to ground.
•
PLANNING DIVISION
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST:
City of Renton Planning Division
1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057
Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231
SEP 2 6 20/1
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires atl ·to11'SrllEl1~/ltal
agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making di!cM!iilii,: ·,:~krr~· :r)
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probabfe•1,~/
significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is
to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to
reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide
whether an EIS is required.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal.
Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of
your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,
with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In
most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project
plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question
does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers
to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark
designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental
agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a
period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help
describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this
checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably
related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact.
USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS:
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered
"does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT
ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the
references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be
read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
-1 -06/09
P:\15000s\15432\planning\Submittals\01-Admin $PR· September 2012\Assembly\FINAL -15432-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKUST-Renton-
2012--09-20.doc
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
QFC Fuel Center -#871 Renton Highlands
2. Name of applicant:
Quality Food Centers, a division of Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Name +
Title +
Company +
Address +
City/State/Zip +
Phone: +
E-Mail: +
Owner I Applicant
Tim Hansen
QFC Real Estate Manager
QFC
10116 NE 8th Street
Bellevue WA 98004
425-462-2163
tim.hansen@qfci.com
4. Date checklist prepared:
September 7, 2012
5. Agency requesting checklist:
Agent / Contact Person
Robert McNeil!
Senior Planner
Barghausen Consulting Engineers
18215 72nd Avenue South
Kent WA 98032
425-656-1061
bmcneill@barghausen.com
City of Renton / Department of Community and Economic Development / Planning Division
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Assuming standard Renton entitlement and permitting processes, with minimal delays, the
construction process is expected to begin on / about March 1, 2013; anticipating a 10-12
week construction period, the project should be completed on / about June 1, 2013. The
process will be continuous with no phasing anticipated.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
There are no plans for future expansion at this time, and none are likely, given the site's
physical constraints. Historically QFC, Fred Meyer and Kroger fuel stations are upgraded
with new imaging and signage (branding) about every 8-10 years, as a matter of corporate
policy.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal.
Several reports have been prepared in support of this proposal and are detailed and/or
described below; if not provided in conjunction with this application, they shall be made
available for review, as necessary:
• Title Report ... providing an record reflecting title and ownership of the property,
while identifying recorded easements, covenants, restrictions and/or conditions
associated with previous development approvals
-2 -06109
P:\15000s\15432\planning\Submittals\01-Admin SPR -September 2012\Assembly\FINAL -15432-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST-Renton-
2012-09-20.doc
•
• Survey: Boundary & Topographical ... providing a geophysical, cartographic
representation of the development parameters associated with this site; combining
field observations with documentation memorialized in the title report
• Transportation Impact Analysis ... an analysis of transportation impacts associated
with the existing use{s) and projected traffic impacts and/or trip generation derived
from the proposed use{s) ... dated September 10, 2012, prepared by Transportation
Engineering Northwest {TENW), Kirkland WA
• Geotechnical Engineering Report ... an analysis of the suitability of soils found
onsite, relative to projected design constraints; including, but not limited to,
recommendations for footings, foundations and subgrade preparation, as well as
excavation protocols used for the tank pit {USTs) ... dated August 22, 2012,
prepared by The Riley Group, Bothell WA
• Wetlands Assessment ... an analysis of existing wetlands and/or wetland hydrology
or streams present onsite; analysis indicated no wetlands or streams present onsite
... dated March 21, 2012, prepared by Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC.
• Phase I Environmental Assessment ... to identify any recognizable environmental
conditions {RECs) and/or business environmental risks {BERs) utilizing
professionals standards and/or methodologies, the existence of which may affect
the project's feasibility from a business perspective ... dated August 27, 2012,
prepared by The Riley Group, Bothell WA
• Environmental Documentation ... a letter from the State of Washington, Department
of Ecology, confirming No Further Action required in terms of remedial action being
necessary to mitigate contamination on the site, dated May 1, 2012
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
To the best of our knowledge, there are no pending applications or approvals for this site.
10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if
known.
The following permits/ approvals will be required to construct the proposed fuel center:
• SEPA Environmental Checklist
• Administrative Site Plan Review
• Urban Design District Review
• Building Permit {Canopy & Kiosk)
• MEP Permits {Mechanical/ Electrical/ Plumbing)
• Fire Engineering {USTs and Monitoring Systems)
• Construction Permit/ Grading
• Right-of-Way Use Permit
• Sign Permits
• Utility Connection Permits
• Business License
• Notice of Construction {PSCAA)
• UST Installation {WSDOE)
• UST Licensing {WSDOL)
-3-06/09
P:\15000s\15432\planning\Submittals\01-Admin SPR -September 2012\Assembly\FINAL ---15432-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKUST-Renton-
2012-09-20.doc
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the
size of the project and site.
QFC's proposal calls for the construction a 40· by 84-foot fuel canopy {3,360 square feet)
and an 8-by 20-foot (160 square feet) cashier's kiosk with ADA-accessible restroom. Using
the 2009 International Building Code (IBC), the canopy and kiosk would be built using Type
ll·B construction and categorized as a Class M Occupancy. The canopy will provide
protective cover for five (5) multi-product dispensers {MPDs), creating a fuel facility with ten
(10) vehicle fueling positions {VFPs).
The facility will also require the installation of two (2) underground storage tanks (USTs);
one 20,000-gallon UST for the storage of regular unleaded fuel, and one 18,000-gallon
split/dual UST (10,000/8,000 gallons each) divided between diesel and supreme unleaded
fuel. Other associated site improvements would include a backup generator, perimeter
landscaping, a pedestrian plaza at the intersection, a free-standing monument sign along
the 4th Street frontage, limited canopy signage, asphalt paving, lot lights, an air/water unit, a
trash enclosure, storage shed and required water quality/stormwater improvements and
utility connections.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the
precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section,
township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide
the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity
map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans
required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans
submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.
The proposed QFC Fuel Center would be built on a single parcel/corner lot located at 4615
4th Street NE, Renton WA 98057; immediately adjacent to the intersection of NE 4th Street
and Duvall Avenue NE. The project site is approximately 22,092 square feet and is located
in the immediate vicinity of a QFC retail store and other diverse commercial uses, which are
located within a nearby shopping center, on a different parcel, across the intersection of NE
4th and Duvall, approximately 600 feet to the NE.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE NORTH 180 FEET {AS MEASURED ALONG THE EAST LINE) OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT THE WEST 150 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THE EAST 20 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR
ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING N0.1804907;
AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 35 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR
ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5849734;
-4-06/09
P:\15000s\15432\planning\Submrttals\01-Admin SPR • September 2012\Assembly\FINAL-15432-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST-Renton-
2012-09-20.doc
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF THE ARC OF A CIRCLE
HAVING A RADIUS OF 25 FEET, SAID CIRCLE BEING TANGENT TO A LINE 35 FEET
SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND
TANGENT TO A LINE 20 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF
SAID SUBDIVISION AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR S.E. 128TH STREET BY
DEED RECORDED JUNE 24, 1987 UNDER RECORDING NO. 8706241488.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. EARTH
a. General description of the site (circle oneQlling, hilly, steep slopes,
mountainous, other . ~
The site is essentially flat with elevations/slopes of approximately four to five feet in the
immediate vicinity of the driveways, mainly along the Duvall Avenue frontage.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?)
Slopes in the driveway areas are projected to be in the neighborhood of five percent (5%);
actual slope will be adjusted through the civil design process.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel,
peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and
note any prime farmland.
The soil is projected to be glacial till; a light to dark gray, non-sorted, non-stratified mixture
of clay, silt, sand, with variable sizing. A detailed description of soil type and strata can be
found in the attached Geotechnical Engineering Report.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe.
To the best of our knowledge, there is no history of soil instability associated with the site
and there are no visible signs of instability.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading
proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Approximately 2,800 cubic yards of material, consisting primarily of asphalt and subsurface
soil, is likely to be affected onsite during cut/fill activity directed at clearing and tank
excavation. Materials deemed unsuitable for reuse as structural fill will be removed from
the site to an approved location; likewise, any fill materials imported will be sourced only
from approved sources.
Should any contaminated soils be identified during the construction process, they shall be
removed and disposed of in accordance with applicable regulations.
-5-06/09
P:\ 15000s\ 15432\planning\Submittals\01-Admin SPR -September 2012\Assembly\FINAL -15432-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST-Renton-
2012-09-20.doc
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally
describe.
Erosion is always possible during the rainy season, but not considered likely during our
construction phase, which is tentatively scheduled to avoid our wettest weather. However
any erosion occurring would not be significant, primarily due to the site's physical
constraints and would be handled by the mitigations proposed in our TESCP.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after
project construction {for example, asphalt or buildings)?
While a final site plan design awaits approval, and subject to final calculation, we estimate
lot coverage by impervious surface will be approximately ninety percent (90%). Our site
plan currently provides perimeter and interior landscaping, but at a reduced level, due to
the loss of property to meet required street improvements and right-of-way dedications.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth,
if any:
Any measures to reduce and/or control erosion and sedimentation will be specified in a
Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP); designed to be fully
compliant with the standards and specifications of the most recently applicable Washington
State Department of Ecology (WSDOE) Stormwater Design Manual. In addition, the project
will be implemented using best management practices (BMPs} recommended by WSDOE,
as well as specific comments and requirements mandated by Renton staff during the plan
review process.
Typically, erosion and sedimentation control begins with the excavation of the tank pit for
UST installation, and continues throughout the construction process; concluding only upon
the project's completion or when the potential for erosion has passed. Due to the high level
of impervious surface and a minimal area of disturbance, specifically for excavation
purposes, erosion controls are likely to be limited to the use of sandbags to divert
stormwater to catch basins, which will in tum, be provided with inlet protection.
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal {i.e., dust,
automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the
project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities
if known.
As proposed, the project will not significantly impact air quality; any impacts would be
derived from the construction of the fuel center, future operations and customer traffic.
During construction, heavy equipment will emit exhaust fumes originating from their use of
gasoline and/or diesel fuels. These emissions would be temporary In nature and not
produce any short-term or long-term harmful effects on the project, customers, adjacent
properties and/or nearby Renton residents. Airborne particulates may be generated during
the land clearing, excavation and grading phases of construction, but we anticipate only
minimal impacts as the provisions of the TESCP are implemented.
After construction is completed and the fuel center is in operation, emissions will originate
from customer vehicles and fuel delivery trucks. These emissions will likely include some
suspended particles, carbon monoxide (CO}, nitrogen oxides (NOXs}, sulfur oxides (SOXs),
-6 -06/09
P:\15000s\15432\planning\Submittals\01-Admin SPR -September 2012\Assembly\FJNAL -15432-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST -Renton-
2012-09-20.doc
volatile organic compounds (VOCs), hydrocarbons and related airborne pollutants typically
associated with the use of fossil fuels.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your
proposal? If so, generally describe.
The only identifiable source of offsite emissions lies in the vehicular traffic found on the
adjoining public and/or private rights-of-way.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if
any:
As further detailed in the TESCP, the number of airborne particulates and/or dust particles
will be minimized through the controlled watering of the grounds, as needed, before and
during land, clearing, excavation and grading activity.
Construction vehicle emissions will be controlled primarily through the use of factory-
installed mufflers and spark arresters; minimizing the amount of noxious emissions and
noise, as well as helping to control airborne dispersal.
To minimize impacts during fuel center operations, vapor recovery systems and equipment,
fully certified by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) will be utilized in all stages of
the fuel distribution process. CARB-certified Stage I dual-point systems will be utilized at
the USTs to reduce vapor release/emissions during deliveries. At the dispensers, typical
refueling operations will utilize CARB-certified Stage II systems to reduce/recover vapors.
3. WATER
a. Surface Water:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)?
If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or
river it flows into.
No surface water body is located in the immediate vicinity of the project site. Renton maps
incorrectly show Maplewood Creek as being within the area, but a wetlands assessment
conducted by certified biologists earlier this year, concluded there were no water courses,
wetlands, ponds or streams located onsite.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the
described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
Not Applicable
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that
would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
Not Applicable
-7-06/09
P:\ 1S000s\15432\planning\Submittals\01-Admin $PR • September 2012\Assembly\FINAL -15432-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST-Renton-
2012-09-20.doc
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
As proposed/designed, the project will not require either the diversion or withdrawal of
surface water. Surface runoff will be controlled onsite, and after treatment, be released to
the designated point of discharge.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the
site plan.
According to FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Community Panel 53033C0982F,
Panel 982 of 1725, dated May 16, 1995, the project site is located in Zone X, and does not lie
within a 500-year floodplain.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters?
If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
This project does not involve the discharge of waste materials to surface waters.
b. Ground Water:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water?
Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
As proposed, this project does not involve the withdrawal of groundwater and no new water
sources will be discharged to groundwater. Test borings have indicated the presence of
groundwater at certain levels/strata, but these are being considered perched sources,
which may require minimal dewatering during peak rainy periods.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic
tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial,
containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general
size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be
served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are
expected to serve.
The only potential source for waste materials entering the ground associated with this
project, lies in unspent hydrocarbons and/or heavy metals collected in surface runoff from
the maneuvering area or parking stalls, as conveyed through the onsite stormwater
collection system.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water}:
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection
and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow?
Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe.
Stormwater runoff from paved surfaces in the maneuvering and parking areas will be
collected and conveyed to a stormwater collection system; incorporating BMPs and in full
compliance with all stormwater regulations mandated by the City of Renton.
2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
Surface water could be contaminated by runoff containing oil, unspent hydrocarbons and
other contaminants from the paved maneuvering and parking areas.
-8-06/09
P:\15000s\15432\planning\Submittals\01-Admin SPR -September 2012\J\ssembly\FINAL-15432-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKUST-Renton-
2012-09-20.doc
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water
impacts, if any:
Stormwater runoff from the concrete drive slab/pad located beneath the fuel canopy will be
collected and subsequently, conveyed through an oil/water separator, and the discharged
into the sanitary sewer system.
4. PLANTS
a. Check or · n found on the site:
eciduous tree: alder, map e pen, other
· e, other
_g
__ pasture
__ crop or grain
__ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
__ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other
__ other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
The existing landscaping onsite is an unplanned growth of trees in variable conditions,
bushes (primarily blackberry) and miscellaneous ground cover, in generally poor and
unmaintained conditions. While no record drawings exist to document plantings, a
preliminary photographic inventory does not indicate much of the existing vegetation can
be incorporated into the new landscape plan for the fuel center.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
To the best of our knowledge, there are no threatened or endangered species known to be
located on or in the immediate vicinity of the site.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or
enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
A new landscape plan is proposed, utilizing vegetation and plantings which are native to
the Pacific Northwest and which are proven to survive within a high traffic area typically
associated with a commercial fuel station environment. Plans include the provision of any
necessary irrigation systems; assuring proper maintenance of the planned landscape.
S. ANIMALS
a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or
are known to be on or near the site:
-9 -06/09
P:\15000s\15432\planning\Submittals\01-Admin SPR -September 2012\Assembly\FINAL -15432-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST-Renton-
2012-09-20.doc
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
To the best of our knowledge, there are no threatened or endangered species known to be
located on or in the immediate vicinity of the site.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain
The project site is located within the Pacific Flyway; a well-known migratory route for many
species, including waterfowl. No impacts associated with the project are likely to affect
migratory species or any temporary habitats associated with their migration patterns
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
With no negative impacts to wildlife or their habitats having been identified, specific
mitigation measures are not necessary, and consequently, none have been proposed in
conjunction with this project.
6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to
meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used
for heating, manufacturing, etc.
Electrical energy will be used to provide power to the fuel facility.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe.
Due to the relatively flat nature of the site and its corner location, combined with the
placement/orientation of the fuel canopy itself, the project will not adversely affect the
potential use of solar energy by any of the adjacent uses.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if
any:
The proposed fuel facility is being designed to be fully compliant with the current standards
imposed by the Washington State Energy Code.
7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur
as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
No extraordinary health risks are foreseen. Potential environmental health hazards could
originate with incidental exposure to gasoline; an inherent risk associated with the
refueling process of any vehicle. Other similar hazards include the risk of fire and/or
potential soil contamination in the unlikely event of a spill and/or release of petroleum
products from the USTs, the fuel distribution system or piping and/or the dispensers .
• 10 -06/09
P:\15000s\15432\planning\Submittals\01-Admin SPR -September 2012\Assembly\FINAL-15432-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST-Renton-
2012-09-20.doc
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
Special emergency services would not be required under typical operating conditions; any
demand place upon existing emergency services would be consistent in nature and
frequency of use with comparable projects.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
Kroger, Fred Meyer and QFC Fuel Centers typically utilize advanced protocols and state-of-
the-art technology and systems to reduce and/or control the potential for environmental
hazards. These features include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Emergency shutoff switches located in accordance with Uniform Fire Code
standards and compliant with all local code requirements; typically, two shutoff
switches are located at the kiosk.
• In accordance with the International Fire Code (IFC) and situated per local code
requirements, fire extinguishers are also provided onsite.
• The USTs installed onsite, as well as all product piping, feature double-wall
fiberglass construction; providing primary and secondary levels of protection. This
type of construction helps to protect against rupture or leakage, as well as
corrosive deterioration of the tank walls and subsequent soil contamination.
• Additional primary and secondary containment features include overfill prevention
(OPW automatic shutoff drop tubes risers), gravity return of any undispensed
product, the use of flex-joints at the USTs and popetted breakaway/impact valves at
the dispensers.
• The potential release of fuel vapors into the air is controlled by the use of CARB-
certified Stage I and Stage II vapor recovery systems onsite. Working together,
these systems greatly reduce the amount of vapor released during fuel deliveries to
the USTs (Stage I) and at the dispensers during the refueling process (Stage II).
• The fuel distribution system components are constantly monitored to detect
leakage or system failure via a 24/7/365 computerized system. This system
provides interstitial monitoring of the space between component walls/layers;
detecting leaks and immediately notifying the attendant onsite (visual and audible
alarms) and the offsite Kroger Fuel Monitoring Center (Denver CO), while
simultaneously shutting down the affected portions of the system. Protocols are in
place to identify the proper response and responders for any type of emergency
situation; while visual and computerized monitoring is conducted both onsite and
offsite, responders are local and on-call, 24/7/365.
• Components are installed by certified installers and pressure-tested during the
installation process in accordance with manufacturers' specifications; detecting
pressure loss and identifying/isolating problem areas, allowing for corrections,
repair or replacement before the site is completely paved and distribution system
components are covered.
• Enhanced employee training and strictly enforced operational protocols provide the
last safeguard against potential environmental hazards. Professional drivers are
experienced and highly skilled, not only in the safe transport and delivery of fuel,
but also in safety and containment procedures should a spill occur. Fuel center
employees are similarly trained in proper response techniques and emergency
procedures; detailed in a hazardous material spill and prevention plan, kept onsite
at all times. Clean-up kits and materials are readily accessible onsite at all times.
-11 -06109
P:\15000s\15432\planning\Submittals\01-Admin SPR -September 2012\Assembly\FINAL -15432-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST-Renton-
2012-09-20.doc
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for
example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
Any noise impact the project site will likely originate from the adjacent public or private
rights-of-way -primarily NE 4th Street and Duvall Avenue SE. However noise levels are not
projected to reach a point where any adverse impacts will be realized.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the
project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction,
operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
The amount of noise generated by the construction process will vary according to the type
and size of equipment used throughout the various stages of construction. At maximum,
the decibel output associated with this type/nature of activity is projected to range between
57 and 89 DBA.
After construction is completed and the project is fully operational, noise impacts will be
limited to the levels generated by vehicular traffic onsite and are not expected to exceed
current levels associated with other commercial uses in the adjacent properties.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
Construction noise will be mitigated through the use of noise attenuation devices on
equipment and will be further limited in duration due to construction restrictions imposed
by the local jurisdictions.
8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
The site Is currently vacant, but was formerly used a service station/convenience market,
as recently as 2007. Historically, a service station has been operating onsite since the early
1960s.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
To the best of our knowledge, the site has not been used for agricultural purposes.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
No structures of any kind are currently onsite; demolition of existing structures and
removal of USTs occurred in 2007.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No demolition will be required; land clearing of existing vegetation will be required.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
The site is currently zoned CA / Commercial Arterial, as are all adjacent properties; no
rezoning is anticipated. The site also falls within the Urban Design District 'D' and is
subject to additional design review guidelines.
-12 -06/09
P:\15000s\15432\planning\Submlttals\01-Admin SPR -September 2012\Assembly\FlNAl -15432-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST-Renton-
2012-09-20.doc
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
CC/ Commercial Corridor; the site is also covered by the NE 4th Street Corridor Plan
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the
site?
Not Applicable
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area?
If so, specify.
Renton's Critical Area Maps indicate the site falls within an Aquifer Protection Zone (Zone
2) and designates a Class 4 stream {Maplewood Creek) as being onsite or in the immediate
vicinity. Renton maps incorrectly show Maplewood Creek as being within the area, but a
wetlands assessment conducted by certified biologists earlier this year, concluded there
were no water courses, wetlands, ponds or streams located onsite.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed
project?
Typical fuel facility staffing dictates a single attendant would be stationed onsite, within the
kiosk; monitoring transactions and deliveries, as well as handling customer inquiries.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
No displacement of either residential or commercial uses is associated with this project.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
With no displacement projected, specific mitigation measures -such as possible relocation
assistance· are neither required nor proposed.
I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any:
Project and use compatibility is assured through substantial compliance with existing land
use plans, zoning controls and other regulatory codes imposed by local, state and/or
Federal authorities with jurisdiction.
9. HOUSING
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether
high, middle, or low-income housing.
This project does not have a residential component.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether
high, middle, or low-income housing.
Not Applicable
-13 -06/09
P:\15000s\15432\planning\Submittals\01-Admin SPR -September 2012\Assembly\FINAL -15432-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST-Renton-
2012--09-20.doc
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
With no displacement projected and no residential component associated with the project,
specific mitigation measures -such as possible relocation assistance • are neither required
nor proposed.
10. AESTHETICS
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s}, not including antennas;
what is the principal exterior building material(s} proposed.
The proposed fuel canopy will extend approximately 19-feet above grade.
The fuel canopy will be constructed of steel and supported by steel columns; fuel canopies
are typically categorized under Type 11-B Construction and Group M Occupancy
(Mercantile). The canopy will be painted in corporate colors and feature minimal signage
on each fascia, used for corporate identification and to provide product/price information
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
No views will be altered or obstructed by the project. Typical setback requirements and
other zoning regulations govern the placement of the fuel canopy onsite; regulating visual
aspects associated with public safety, along with aesthetic considerations.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
No aesthetic impacts have been identified; the size and scale of the project's components
have been designed and placed onsite to minimize any impacts on adjacent properties and
for passing pedestrians and/or motorists.
11. LIGHT AND GLARE
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it
mainly occur?
Any light or glare produced by this project will be minimal and primarily limited to glare
produced by customers' vehicle headlights -primarily during evening hours.
The fuel facility's lighting fixtures, both canopy lights and lot lights, are recessed and
designed to focus light directly downwards; eliminating any potential glare or spillover onto
adjacent properties or rights-of-way.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with
views?
No safety hazards are projected and no views obstructed or affected by site lights or glare.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
None; street lights and vehicular traffic are the only potential sources and no issue are
projected from either source.
-14 -06/09
P:\15000s\15432\planning\Submittals\01-Admin SPR -September 2012\Assembly\FINAL -15432-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST-Renton-
2012-09-20.doc
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
The project is designed to address any such impacts -primarily through the selection of
fixtures which direct light downwards, towards pump islands, kiosk and parking areas.
12. RECREATION
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate
vicinity?
None have been identified.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
No recreational uses or opportunities would be displaced by this project.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
With no impacts identified, specific mitigation measures are neither required nor proposed
13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local
preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally
describe.
To the best of our knowledge, no architectural, cultural or historically significant structures
exist in the immediate vicinity of the project site.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
None have been identified.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
With no impacts Identified, specific mitigation measures are neither required nor proposed
14. TRANSPORTATION
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
The site is served by NE 4th Street and Duvall Avenue SE; access to both will be provided
through driveways -one serving each public right-of-way. Please refer to the site plan for
details on location and size of access drives and the nature of access provided by each.
-15 -06/09
P:\ 15000s\15432\planning\Submittals\01-Admin SPR -September 2012\Assembly\FINAL -15432-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST-Renton-
2012-09-20.doc
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate
distance to the nearest transit stop?
Yes ... METRO Transit Route 105 / Renton Highlands ... with service to the site
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would
the project eliminate?
2 stalls, including 1 accessible stall will be provided. No parking currently exists onsite.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing
roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate
whether public or private?
Subject to confirmation by Renton staff, improvements will be required to both rights-of•
way serving the property; dedications will occur to expand the rights-of-way to meet current
standards. A traffic signal will have to be relocated as well. A pedestrian plaza will be
installed at the intersection of NE 4th Street and Duvall Avenue SE.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
No impacts to water, rail or air transport have been identified.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
The attached Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA}, prepared by TENW, dated September 10,
2012, provides an analysis of queuing, trip generation and traffic impacts and potential
impact fees associated with the proposal; the results point to no significant impact on the
area's transportation systems. Please refer to the TIA for specific data and a thorough
discussion of impacts and methodologies used in the analysis.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
With no impacts identified or linked (excluding dedications and signal relocation) to the
transportation system, specific mitigation measures are neither required nor proposed
15. PUBLIC SERVICES
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example:
fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally
describe.
No increase is projected, aside from normal increases associated with commercial growth
and projects of similar nature and/or size.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
No additional mitigation is proposed to reduce public service impacts. However the
extensive nature of equipment, technology and training associated with this project,
including levels of containment and systems previously discussed in detail, will serve to
greatly diminish any demand for public services.
-16 -06/09
P:\15000s\15432\planning\Submittals\01-Admin $PR -September 2012\Assembly\FINAL -15432-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKUST-Renton-
2012-09-20.doc
16. UTILITIES
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water,
refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
The site is fully served by all public utilities -including sanitary sewer.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the
service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate
vicinity which might be needed.
All public and private utilities serving the site are projected to have adequate capacity to
handle demand generated by this project, with minimal connection issues. Utility
purveyors will include the City of Renton.
C. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
Washington that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true, correct,
and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of
non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any
willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Proponent Signature: -~'----"'------'--'-~W(dl'----'-""'-==·=-[Af,-~)'----
Name Printed: f,o bu-,t--P. VVlc Ne,U
Date:
· 17 -06/09
P:\15000s\15432\planning\Submittals\01-Admin SPR -September 2012\Assembly\FINAL -15432-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST-Renton-
2012-09-20.doc
Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC AOA
F,n. ( l:?.\} :tU-l.~111(1 En\'ironmenral
March 21, 2012
Brian Jessen
Eastside Funding LLC
3933 Lake WA Blvd. NE, Suite 100
Kirkland, WA 98033
SUBJECT: Critical Areas Review for 4615 NE 4th Street
Renton, WA (Parcel 152305-9124)
Planning-&
Landscape
Architecture
AOA-4169
-:i!.-i -,.
SEP 2 6 1n1·
'" I
Dear Brian:
On March 20, 2012 I conducted a wetland and stream reconnaissance on the
subject property utilizing the methodology outlined in the 1997 Washington State
We/lands Identification and Delineation Manual and the 2010 Regional Supplement
to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains,
Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0).
Existing Conditions
It is my understanding that the site was previously developed with a gas station and
associated food mart. At the time of the site visit, the property was undeveloped and
consisted primarily of compact fill. Vegetation on the site was generally confined to
a small remnant depression in the southern portion of the property and consisted of
an upland plant community that included big-leaf maple (Acer macrophyl/um), black
cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), hazelnut (Cory/us comuta), Indian plum
(Oemleria cerasiformis), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), and Scot's
broom ( Cytisus scoparius). No hydrophytic plant communities were observed on the
site.
Borings taken throughout the vegetated portion of the property revealed dry, non-
hydric, high chroma soils and there was no evidence of ponding or prolonged soil
saturation anywhere on the site.
Surrounding land use includes NE 41
" Street to the north, Duvall Ave. NE to the east,
and retail development with associated paved parking immediately adjacent the west
and south property boundaries.
' ........ >'
Brian Jessen
March 21, 2012
Page2
Conclusion
No wetlands or streams are located on or adjacent to the property. This conclusion
is based on a field investigation that did not identify any hydrophytic plant
communities, hydric soils, or evidence of wetland hydrology anywhere on or
adjacent to the site.
If you have any questions regarding the reconnaissance, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
ALTMANN OLIVER ASSOCIATES, LLC
John Altmann
Ecologist
Western Washington, Corporate Office
17522 Bothell Way Northeast
Bothell, Washington 98011
Phone 425.415.0551 • Fax 425.415.031 I
~
The Rilev Group, Inc.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT
,.~ .-
SH. 2 6 2011 PREPARED BY:
THE RILEY GROUP, INC.
: : :;c,)l 7522 BOTHELL WAY NORTHEAST
I __ :·-,,.;
----BOTHELL, WASHINGTON 98011
PREPARED FOR:
KROGER, INC.
3663 1ST A VENUE SOUTH
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98134
PROJECT No. 2012-345
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT
QFC 871 FUEL STATION
4615 NORTHEAST 4TH STREET
RENTON, WASHINGTON 98059
AUGUST 22, 2012
SERVING THE PACWIC NORTHWEST
\..tl.YW. ,iley-group. com
Eastern Wasl,ington and Oregon Office
1838 South Washington Street
Kennewick, Washington 99337
Phone 509.586.4840 • Fax 509. 586.4863
The Riley Group, l11c.
August 22, 2012
Mr. Brian Peterson
Kroger, Inc.
3663 1st Avenue South
Seattle, Washington 98134
Subject: Gcotcchnical Engineering Report
QFC 871 Fuel Station
4615 Northeast 4th Street
Renton, Washington 98059
Project No. 2012-345
Dear Mr. Peterson:
As requested, The Riley Group, Inc. (RGI) has performed a Geotechnical Engineering
Repo1i (GER) for the QFC 871 Fuel Station located at 4615 Northeast 4th Street in
Renton, Washington. RGI understands that Kroger, Inc. is planning to construct a fuel
station at the site. Our services were outlined in our proposal dated December 21, 2011 and
authorized on July 27, 2012.
This GER presents our geotechnical findings and recommendations for the proposed
project. These recommendations should be incorporated into project design and
construction. RGI also recommends that a representative of our firm be present on site
during portions of the project construction to confirm that the soil and groundwater
conditions are consistent with those that form the basis for the engineering
recommendations in this GER.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please call us at (425) 415-
0551.
Respectfully submitted,
THE RILEY GROUP, INC,
Eric L. Woods, LG
Project Geologist
EWIRW/sp
Westen, 1Vas/1foglo1r1 Corporalt! Office
17$22 Bothe/{ Way Nol'Jheast, Suite A
Bothtl/, Was/JJ11gto11 9801 I
Phone 425./IS.055/ • Fax 425.415.03/ J
Ricky R. Wang, PhD, PE
Principal Engineer
SERVING THE PACIFIC NORTHWF.ST
11111'111.1·ilt.;,.gro1rp.com
Easttm Wu.rhhlgto11 a11d Orego11 Office
1838 South Was'1ingron Slreel
Kennew;ck, Wash/11glon 99337
Phone 509.586.4840 • Fm 509. 586.4863
Geotechnical Engineering Report Page ii
QFC 871 Fuel Station, Renton, Washington
TABLE OF CONTENTS
August 22. 2012
RGI Project No. 2012-345
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................. .
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK ........................................................................................................................... 1
3.0 SITE CONDITIONS .......................................................................................................................... 2
3.1 SURFACE ............................................................................................................................................... 2
3.2 SOILS ..................................................................................................................................................... 2
3.3 GROUNDWATER ..................................................................................................................................... 2
3.4 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................................................................... 2
4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................ 3
4.1 GENERAL .............................................................................................................................................. 3
4.2 SITE PREPARATION AND GRADING ........................................................................................................ 4
4.3 STRUCTIJRAL FILL ................................................................................................................................. 4
4.4 EXCAVATIONS AND SHORING ................................................................................................................ 5
4.5 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS (USTS) ............................................................................................. 5
4.6 FOUNDATIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 6
4. 7 KIOSK SLAB-ON-GRADE ........................................................................................................................ 6
4.8 DRAINAGE ............................................................................................................................................. 6
4.9 UTILITIES ............................................................................................................................................... 7
4.lOPAVEMENTS ........................................................................................................................................... 7
5.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES ............................................................................................................... 8
6.0 LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 8
FIGURES AND APPENDICES
Figure 1 ................................................................................................................... Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 ............................................................................................. Geotechnical Exploration Plan
Appendix A ........................................................................ Field Exploration and Laboratory Testing
THE RILEY GROUP, INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
QFC 871 Fuel Stalion, Renton, Washington
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Page I August 22, 2012
RGI Project No. 2012-345
The Riley Group, Inc. (RGI) has performed a Geotechnical Engineering Report (GER) for
the proposed QFC 871 Fuel Station located at 4615 Northeast 4th Street in Renton,
Washington. The approximate location of the site is shown on Figure I, The site is
currently vacant.
The proposed project consists of a fueling facility including two underground storage tanks
(UST). Our understanding of the project is based on the Detailed Site Plan (DD2) prepared
by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated June 25, 2012. At the time of preparing
this GER, detailed design plans were not available for our review.
Based on our experience with similar projects, RGI expects that the proposed kiosk will be
a one-story, light-weight structure supported on perimeter walls and spread-footing
foundation. Steel columns at each pump island will support the pump island canopy, The
maximum load for the canopy is expected to be 50 kips per column. RGI expects that
excavations up to 20 feet in depth will be needed for the UST installation.
The recommendations in the following sections of this GER are based upon our
understanding of the above design features. If actual features vary or changes are made,
RGI should review them in order to modify our recommendations as required. In addition,
RGI requests to review final design drawings and specifications to verify that our project
understanding is correct and that our recommendations have been properly interpreted and
incorporated into project design and construction.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
On August 9, 2012, RGI drilled two test borings to a maximum depth of 26 feet below
ground surface (bgs). The borings were drilled with a rubber-track, hollow stem auger drill
rig within the proposed fueling facility and UST area. The approximate boring locations
are shown on Figure 2.
Using the information obtained from our subsurface exploration, RGI developed
geotechnical recommendations for project design and construction for the following:
> Soil and groundwater conditions > Underground storage tanks
> Seismic considerations
> Site preparation and grading
> Excavations
> Foundations
> Slab-on-grade
> Utilities and pavements
Field screening of the soils was completed as part of the explorations on site. The result of
the field screening and testing of the groundwater is provided under separate cover.
THE RILEY GROUP, INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
QFC 871 Fuel Station, Renton, Washington
3.0 SITE CONDITIONS
3.1 SURFACE
Pagel August 22, 2012
RGI Project No. 2012-345
The site is a rectangular-shaped property located at the southwest corner of Northeast 4th
Street and Duvall Avenue. The site is bound to the north by Northeast 4th Street, to the
east by Duvall Avenue, to the south and west by commercial properties.
The site is currently vacant. The site is relatively flat with overall elevation difference less
than 5 feet.
3.2 SOILS
The soil encountered during the field exploration was consistent in the two locations
explored. The site is underlain by over 25 feet of very dense glacial till which consists of
silty sand with gravel.
Our review of the Geologic Map of Surficial Deposits in the Seattle 30 · by 60'
Quadrangle, Washington (James C. Yount, etc. 1993) indicates that the native soil in the
area was mapped as Vashon till (Map unit Qvt). Glacial till is described as a light to dark
gray, nonsorted, nonstratified mixture of clay, silt, sand, and gravel to boulder size. The
native soils encountered at the site are generally consistent with the above description.
More detailed descriptions of the subsurface conditions encountered are presented on the
boring logs in Appendix A. Grain-size analyses were performed on selected samples and
the results are located in Appendix A.
During the geotechnical investigation, RGI project geologist field screened the soil
samples using a photoionization detector (PID). Field screening with a PID was
accomplished by placing a small amount of soil in a plastic bag and sealing the bag,
allowing any vapors to collect. The metal tip of the PID was used to pierce the bag and a
reading was taken after the values had stabilized. No visual indications of contamination or
readings with the PID were observed.
3.3 GROUNDWATER
A groundwater table was not encountered during the field exploration. Light groundwater
seepage was encountered at Boring B-I at a depth of 6 feet. The seepage appears to be
indicative of seasonal groundwater collecting within clean sand interbeds.
Fluctuations in groundwater level should be expected on a seasonal and annual basis. The
level will be highest during the extended periods of heavy seepage in the wet winter
months. Groundwater seepage may be encountered in excavations area if the construction
occurs in the wet season. It will not likely affect the construction activities.
3.4 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS
Based on the 2009 International Building Code (IBC), RGI recommends the following
seismic parameters for design:
THE RILEY GROUP, INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
QFC 871 Fuel Station, Renton, Washington
Site Soil
Site Latitude
Site Longitude
Parameter
Page3
Table 1 2009 IBC
Short Period Spectral Response Acceleration, (percent g)
I -Second Period Spectral Response Acceleration, (percent g)
Seismic Coefficient,
Seismic Coefficient,
August 22, 2012
RGI Project No. 2012-345
Value
47.488203
122.156704
139
47.3
1.000
1.327
1. Note: In general accordance with-the 2009 IBC, Table 1613.5.2. IBC Site Class is based on the average characteristics of the upper
100 feet of the subsurface profile.
2. Note: The 2009 IBC requires a site soil profile detennina1ion extending to a depth of 100 feet for seismic site classification. The
current scope of our services does not include the required I 00-foot soil profile determination. Borings extended to a maximum depth
of 26 feet, and this seismic site class definition considers that similar soil continues below the maximum depth of the subsurface
exploration. Additional exploration to deeper depths would be required to confinn the conditions below the current depth of
exploration.
Liquefaction is a phenomenon where there is a reduction or complete loss of soil strength
due to an increase in water pressure induced by vibrations from a seismic event.
Liquefaction mainly affects geologically recent deposits of fine-grained sands that are
below the groundwater table. Soils of this nature derive their strength from intergranular
friction. The generated water pressure or pore pressure essentially separates the soil grains
and eliminates this intergranular friction, thus reducing or eliminating the soil's strength.
RGI reviewed the soil conditions encountered during field exploration and assessed the
potential for liquefaction of the site's soil during an earthquake. The native soil is very
dense glacial and is generally considered not subject to soil liquefaction during an
earthquake.
4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMEND A TIO NS
4.1 GENERAL
Based on our explorations, the site is suitable for the proposed project from a geotechnical
standpoint. The native soil is suitable for supporting of the proposed foundations and tanks.
The canopy for the proposed fueling facility can be supported on column footing
foundations bearing on stiff native soil. The proposed kiosk can be supported on spread
footing foundation bearing on native soil. Pavement can be similarly supported on native
soil.
Detailed recommendations regarding the above issues and other geotechnical design
considerations are provided in the following sections. These recommendations should be
incorporated into the final design drawings and construction specifications.
THE RILEY GROUP, INC.
•
Geotechnica/ Engineering Report Page4
QFC 871 Fuel Station, Renton, Washington
4.2 SITE PREPARATION AND GRADING
August 22, 2012
RGI Project No. 2011-345
The site should be prepared for construction by removing the asphalt surfacing. Utilities to
be abandoned should be removed and replaced with structural fill.
Proofrolling and subgradc verification should be considered an essential step in site
preparation. After stripping and prior to placement of structural fill, RGI recommends
proofrolling subgradcs of the canopy area, pavement area, and areas to receive structural
fill. These areas should be compacted to a firm and unyielding condition in order to
achieve a minimum compaction level of 95 percent of the modified proctor maximum dry
density as determined by the American Society of Testing and Materials DI 557-09
Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified
Effort (ASTM D1557).
Proofrolling and adequate subgrade compaction can only be achieved when the soils are
within approximately ± 2 percent moisture content of the optimum moisture content. Soils
that appear firm after stripping and grubbing may be proofrolled with a heavy compactor,
loaded double-axle dump truck, or other heavy equipment under the observation of an RGI
representative. This observer will assess the subgrade conditions prior to filling. The need
for or advisability of proofrolling due to soil moisture conditions should be determined at
the time of construction. In wet areas it may be necessary to hand probe the exposed
subgrades in lieu ofproofrolling with mechanical equipment.
Subgrade soils that become disturbed due to elevated moisture conditions should be
overexcavated to reveal firm, non-yielding, non-organic soils and backfilled with
compacted structural fill. In order to maximize utilization of site soils as structural fill, RGI
recommends that the earthwork portion of this project be completed during extended
periods of warm and dry weather, if possible. If earthwork is completed during the wet
season (typically November through May) it will be necessary to take extra precautionary
measures to protect subgrade soils. Wet season earthwork will require additional mitigative
measures beyond that would be expected during the drier summer and fall months.
4.3 STRUCTURAL FILL
The native soil is moisture sensitive and may not be suitable to be used as structural fill if
the construction occurs in the wet season. If the site soils become wet or the construction
takes place in wet weather, RGI recommends import material that meets the following
grading requirements for site grading and backfill.
Table 2 Structural Fill Gradation
U.S. Sieve Size Percent Passing
3 inches 100
No. 4 sieve 75 percent
No. 200 sieve 5 percent*
"'Based on minus 3/4 inch fraction.
THE RILEY GROUP, INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
QFC 871 Fuel Station, Renton, Washington
Page5 August 22, 2012
RGI Project No. 2012-345
Prior to use, an RGI representative should observe and test all materials imported to the
site for use as structural fill. Structural fill materials should be placed in uniform loose
layers not exceeding 10 inches and compacted as specified in Table 3. The soil's maximum
density and optimum moisture should be determined by ASTM D1557.
Table 3 Structural Fill Compaction ASTM Dl557
Minimum Moisture Content Location Material Type Compaction Range Percentage
Foundations Approved imported fill soils: 95 +2 -2
Slab-on-grade Approved imported fill soils: 95 +2 -2
General Fill (non-Approved imported fill soils:
structural areas) 90 +3 -2
Pavement -Subgrade Approved imported fill soils:
and Base Course 95 +2 -2
Placement and compaction of structural fill should be observed by RGI. A representative
number of in-place density tests should be performed as the fill is being placed to confirm
that the recommended level of compaction is achieved.
4.4 EXCAVATIONS AND SHORING
Site excavations for US Ts, pump island dispensers, and utility and piping trenches must be
completed in accordance with the applicable Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) and American Petroleum Institute (API) or other requirements.
Based on OSHA regulations, the native soil classifies as a Group A soil.
In all cases, however, appropriate inclinations will depend on the actual soil and
groundwater conditions encountered during earthwork. Ultimately, the site contractor must
be responsible for maintaining safe excavation slopes that comply with applicable OSHA
or Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act (WISHA) guidelines.
Accordingly, for excavations more than 4 feet but less than 20 feet in depth, the temporary
side slopes should be laid back with a minimum slope inclination of3/4H:IV (Horizontal:
Vertical). Following excavation, all exposed slopes must be covered with reinforced plastic
sheeting that is securely anchored to the slope face. This sheeting will contain loose soil
conditions that may develop on the slope face and ravel off, therefore, preventing erosion
of the slope face during periods of precipitation.
4.5 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS (USTS)
RGI understands that two USTs will be installed to the south of the canopy and near the
existing restaurant dumpster area. The installation of the US Ts will require an excavation
ofup to 20 feet bgs. The USTs can be installed in a single excavation. The depth to the top
of the USTs is typically 3 feet below finished grade with at least 2 feet of appropriate
backfill material. The backfill can be either pea gravel or other material per API
specifications for setting the tanks.
THE RILEY GROUP, INC.
Geotechnical Engineerin[t Report
QFC 871 Fuel Station, Renton, Washington
Pagc6 August 22, 2012
RGI Project No. 2012-345
Seepage should be expected in the excavation, however, if the excavation is completed in
the drier summer months, this seepage should be controllable with sumps set in the
excavation.
The installation will require tank hold down slabs or anchors to accommodate possible
buoyant forces. The UST system installation and design must be in accordance with API
regulations.
4.6 FOUNDATIONS
Following the site grading and UST installation, the proposed canopy can be supported on
column foundations bearing on dense native soil. The proposed kiosk can be supported on
continuous footing bearing on native soil. RGI recommends designing foundations for a
net allowable bearing capacity of2,500 pounds per square foot (psf). For short-term loads,
such as wind and seismic, a 1/3 increase in this allowable capacity can be used.
For designing foundations to resist lateral loads, a base friction coefficient of 0.30 can be
used. Passive earth pressures acting on the side of the footing can also be considered for
resisting lateral loads. RGI recommends calculating this lateral resistance using an
equivalent fluid weight of 250 pounds per cubic foot (pct). This value assumes the
foundation will be constructed neat against competent structural fill as described in Section
4.2. The recommended friction and passive resistance values include a safety factor of 1.5.
With foundations designed in accordance with the recommendations in this section,
maximum total and differential post-construction settlements of 1 inch and 1/2 inch in 50
feet, respectively, should be expected.
4.7 KIOSK SLAB-ON-GRADE
RGI recommends that slab-on-grade be supported on firm native soil subgrade.
Immediately below the floor slab, RGI recommends placing a 4-inch-thick capillary break
layer of clean, free-draining pea gravel, washed rock, or crushed rock that has less than 5
percent passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve. This material will reduce the potential for upward
capillary movement of water through the underlying soil and subsequent wetting of the
floor slab. Where moisture by vapor transmission is undesirable, an 8-to I 0-millimeter-
thick plastic membrane should be placed on a 4-inch-thick layer of capillary break.
4.8 DRAINAGE
Final exterior grades should promote free and positive drainage away from building. Water
must not pond or collect adjacent to the kiosk or within the immediate canopy area. RGI
recommends providing a minimum drainage gradient of 3 percent for a minimum distance
of IO feet from the canopy perimeter, except in paved locations. In paved locations, a
minimum gradient of I percent should be provided unless provisions are included for
collection and disposal of surface water adjacent to the structure.
RGI understands that an infiltration system is being considered for the on-site disposal of
storm water run-off in the parking area. The native soil is not suitable for infiltration. In
our opinion, an on-site infiltration system below the ground surface is not feasible.
THE RILEY GROUP, INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
QFC 871 Fuel Station, Renton, Washington
4.9 UTILITIES
Pagel August 22, 2012
RGI Project No. 2012-345
Utility pipes should be bedded and backfilled in accordance with American Public Works
Association (APW A) specifications. For site utilities located within the City of Renton
right-of-ways, bedding and backfill should be completed in accordance with City of
Renton specifications. The trench backfill should be placed and compacted as structural
fill, as described in Section 4.2.
Where utilities occur below unimproved areas, the degree of compaction can be reduced to
a minimum of 90 percent of the soil's maximum density as determined by the referenced
ASTM standard. As noted, excavated native soil is moisture sensitive and may not be
suitable for being used as backfill. hnported structural fill should be used for all backfills if
the construction occurs in wet season. The backfill material should satisfy the structural fill
requirements listed in Section 4.3.
Product and vent piping trenches should be sloped, bedded, and backfilled in accordance
with the API specifications.
4.10 PAVEMENTS
Pavement section may match the existing pavement section on the site. For new pavement,
the subgrade should be prepared as described in Section 4.2 of this GER and as discussed
below. Regardless of the relative compaction achieved, the subgrade must be firm and
relatively unyielding before paving. This condition should be verified by proofrolling with
construction equipment or hand probe by an RGI representative.
With the pavement subgrade prepared as described above, RGI recommends that the area
be paved with flexible pavement surface. The following pavement sections arc
recommended:
» For heavy truck traffic areas: 4 inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over 8 inches of
crushed rock base (CRB)
» For general parking areas: 3 inches of AC over 6 inches of CRB
The asphalt-paving materials used should conform to the Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT) specifications for Hot-Mix Asphalt 1/2-inch Class and CRB
surfacing.
Long-term pavement performance will depend on surface drainage. A poorly-drained
pavement section will be subject to premature failure as a result of surface water
infiltrating into the subgrade soils and reducing their supporting capability.
For optimum pavement performance, surface drainage gradients of no less than 2 percent
are recommended. Also, some degree of longitudinal and transverse cracking of the
pavement surface should be expected over time. Regular maintenance should be planned to
seal cracks when they occur.
THE RILEY GROUP, INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Rep ort
QFC 871 Fuel Station, Renton, Wash ing ton
5.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Page 8 A ugust 22, 2012
RG T Project No. 2012 -345
RGI is available to provide fu11her geotechnical consultation as the project design
develops. RGI should review the final design and specifications in order to verify that
earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and
incorporated into project design and construction.
RGI is also available to provide geotechnical engineering and monitoring services during
cons truction. The integrity of the earthwork and construction depends on proper site
preparation and procedures. In addition, engineering decisions may have to be made in the
field in the event that variation s in subsurface conditions become apparent. Construction
monitoring services are not pa11 of this scope of work. If these services are desired, please
let us know and RGI will prepare a cost proposal.
6.0 LIMITATIONS
This GER is the property of RGI, Kroger, Inc., and their designated agents and was
prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. This
GER is intended for specific application to the QFC 871 Fuel Station in Renton,
Washington. This GER was prepared for the exclus ive u s e of Kroger, Inc. and its
authorized representatives. It should be made available to prospective contractors for
information or factual data only and not as a warranty of ground conditions. No other
warranty, expressed or impli ed, is made.
The scope of services for thi s project docs not include either specifically or by implication
an y biological (for exampl e, mold, fungi , bacteria) a s sessment of the site or id entification
or prevention of pollutants, haz ardous materials or conditions. Field screening of the soils
and s ampling of the groundwater was completed a s part of the explorations on site. The
result of the field screening and testing of the groundwater is provided under separate
cover.
The analyse s and recommendation s pres ented in this G ER are based upon data obtained
from the t es t borings drilled on site. Variations in soil conditions can occur, the nature and
extent of which may not become e vident until con struction. Site safety, excavation support ,
and dewatering requirements are the responsibility of others. In the event that changes in
the nature, des ign , or location of the project as outlined in this GER are planned, the
conclus ions and recommendations contained in thi s GER shall not be con sid er ed valid
unless RGI is reques ted to reevaluate the recommendations in this GER prior to proceeding
with construction.
It is the client's r espons ibility to see that all parties to the project, including the des igners,
contractors, subcontractors , arc made aware of this GER in its entire ty . The use of
information contained in thi s GER for bidding purposes should b e done at th e contractor's
option and risk.
THE RILEY GRO UP, INC.
USGS, 1994, Renton, Washington
7 .5-Minute Quadrangle
The Riley Group, Inc.
17522 Bothell Way Northeast, Suite A
Bothell, Washington 98011
Phone: 425.415.0551 + Fax: 425.41 5.03 11
• • a
• • •••• • • • • • • • ti •
Approximate Scale: 1 "=1000'
0 500 1000
QFC 871 F uel Station
RGI Project Number
2012-345
Site Vicinity Map
2000
Figure 1
Date Drawn:
08/2012
Address: 4615 Northeast 4th Street, R enton, Washington 98059
(§)
0 • B-1 -(§)
0
0 43'
N.E. 4TH STREET
TRASH
ENCLOSURE
----------
0 B-1 to B-2 Test Borings up to 25' bgs
/
~EX. TRAFFIC SIGNAL
POLE TO BE RELOCATED
Approximate Scale: 1 "=30'
PLAZA AREA
w => z
~
<(
....l
....l
~ => 0
Drawn from Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., DD-2 Detailed Site Plan, 06/25/12 0 15 30 60
•
The Riley Group, Inc. ~ 17522 Bothell Way Northeast, Suit,: A
Bothell, Washington 98011
Phone: 425.415.0551 + Fax: 425.415.0lll
QFC 871 Fuel Station
RGI Project Number
2012-345
Geotechnical Exploration Plan
Figure 2
Date Drawn:
08/2012
Address: 4615 Northeast 4th Street, Renton, Washington 98059
Geolechnical Engineering Report
QFC 871 Fuel Station, Renton, Washington
APPENDIX A
Augusl 22, 2012
RGI Project Nu. 2012-345
FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING
QFC 871 Fuel Station
4615 Northeast 4th Street
Renton, Washington 98059
On August 9, 2012, RGI performed our field exploration using a rubber-track drill rig, RGI
explored subsurface soil conditions at the site by advancing two test borings to a maximum
depth of 26 feet below existing grade, The boring locations are shown on Figure 2, The
boring locations were approximately determined by interpolating from existing property
features,
A geologist from our office conducted the field exploration and classified the soil
conditions encountered, maintained a log of each test boring, obtained representative soil
samples, and observed pertinent site features. All soil samples were visually classified in
accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) described on the sheet
behind the boring logs,
Representative soil samples obtained from the borings were placed in closed containers
and taken to our laboratory for further examination and testing. The moisture content of
selected samples was measured and is reported on the boring logs. Grain-size analyses
were performed on selected samples.
THE RILEY GROUP, INC.
Project Name: QFC 871 Fuel Station
Project Number: 2012-345
Client: Kroger, Inc.
Date(s) Drilled: 818112
Drilling Method(s): HSA
Drill Rig Type: Rubber Track Drill Rig
Groundwater Level N I E I d ATD
and Date Measured: 0 ncoun ere
Borehole Backfill: Bentonite Chips
,i u
C
m ~ .. ·a; ~ Ii ~ m Q & E
C ~ I-0, ~ >,
~ .., " ,[ ~ .. (/)
~ C. > (/)
> 15. E E E ~ 0 0 " u
" " " "£ " (/) w 0 (/) (/) (/) r, Q'. :,
0
50/6"
5
"
10
50/5"
15 50/2"
20 5013"
25 5013"
Logged By: EW
Drill Bit Size/Type: 6" Diameter
Drilling Contractor: Boretec
~ Boring No.: B-1 'Ea.... Sheet 1 of 1
Surface Conditions: Grass
Total Depth of Borehole: 25.25 feet bgs
Approximate /
Surface Elevation: n a
Sampling Method(s): SPT Hammer Data: 140 lb, 30 in drop, rope and
cathead
Location: 4615 Northeast 4th Street, Renton, WA 98059
8' ...,
u :c a.
I!! MATERIAL DESCRIPTION " Gray silty SAND with some gravel, very dense, moist (Glacial Till)
3.9
Becomes moist to wet, 28.5% fines
1/4" sand interbeds with light groundwater seepage at 6' 6.6
16.0
No recovery
5.6
6.4
30~~-~~-~--~-~-~----------------------------~-----1
The Riley Group, Inc.
17522 Bothell Way NE, Bothell, WA 98011
1636 South Washington Street, Kennewick, WA 99337
•
Project Name: QFC 871 Fuel Station c Boring No.: B-2
Project Number: 2012-345 Sheet 1 of 1
Client: Kroger, Inc.
Date(s) Drilled: 8/8/12 Logged By: EW Surface Conditions: Grass
Drilling Method(s): HSA Drill Bit Size/Type: 6" Diameter Total Depth of Borehole: 20.5 feet bgs
Drill Rig Type: Rubber Track Drill Rig Drilling Contractor: Boretec Approximate
Surface Elevation: n/a
Groundwater Level Not Encountered ATD Sampling Method(s): SPT H O 1 140 lb, 30 in drop, rope and
and Date Measured: ammer a a : cathead
Borehole Backfill: Bentonite Chips Location: 4615 Northeast 4th Street, Renton, WA 98059
l'l
C
~ * J'
·a; 0
~ I " ~ .c "' [ Q 0: E 0
C 1--"' ~ iii ...,
~ g " -! :[ ~ " 0
t 75 > <f) :c ~ ~ E E E ~ 0 (.) Q. 0 ~ ·5 " " "' "' "'0 " <f) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION jjj D <f) <f) <fJ :0 0: :::, "' ::. -0 SM Gray silty gravelly SAND, very dense, moist (Glacial Till) .
. . .
-~ 13.5% fines .
90 14.1
. ,i,,.; .
-,-~ 50/J" "sM Gray silty SAND with some gravel, very dense, moist (Glacial Till) 8.4
. . -
. .
. .
. . •
-10-~ --50/3" 8.4 . -• .
. -
-.
. -• .
-15-s --
50/5" 8.4 -.
. -•
.
• .
-20-~ --8.2 5016" .
. • .
. . •
-• .
-25---
. . " .
. . .
.
-30
Tile Riley Group, Inc.
17522 Bothell Way NE, Bothell, WA 98011
1838 South Washington Str&et, Kennewick, WA 99337
•
Project Name: QFC 871 Fuel Station
Project Number: 2012-345
Client: Kroger, Inc.
1l
C
~
~ -~
.§ m ;,-0
~ I " .c
Q 0: E
C I-C, cC >,
g ID " .s ~ ID Cf)
~ .c 0 0. a. en > Cf)
15. E E E ~ 0 () u " " m m mo £ Cf) w " Cf) Cf) Cf) :0 :J
l.1J w 3 L1J w w LZ.J -
COLUMN DESCRIPTIONS
C,
0 ...,
0
:0 a.
I"
"'
..!!.
~ Key to Log of Boring :a.._ Sheet1 of1
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
i Elevation (feet): Elevation (MSL, feet). [fil Recovery(%): Core Recovery Percentage is determined based on
Depth (feet): Depth in feet below the ground surface. a ratio of the length of core sample recovered compared to the
Sample Type: Type of soil sample collected at the depth interval cored interval length.
shown. [I] uses Symbol: uses symbol of the subsurface material.
@ Sample ID: Sample identification number. I!) Graphic Log: Graphic depiction of the subsurface material
[fil Sampling Resistance, blows/ft: Number of blows to advance driven encountered.
sampler one foot (or distance shown) beyond seating interval [!I MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Description of material encountered.
using the hammer identified on the boring log. May include consistency, moisture, color, and other descriptive
text.
FIELD AND LABORATORY TEST ABBREVIATIONS
CHEM: Chemical tests to assess corrosivity
COMP: Compaction test
CONS: One-dimensional consolidation test
LL: Liquid Limit, percent
MATERIAL GRAPHIC SYMBOLS
• Silty SAND (SM)
TYPICAL SAMPLER GRAPHIC SYMBOLS
NI Shelby Tube (Thin-walled,
~ fixed head)
~ Auger sampler
~ Bulk Sample
IT! 3-inch-OD California w/
IAJ brass rings
GENERAL NOTES
rn CME Sampler
m Continuous Core Sampler
W Grab Sample
12.5-inch-OD Modified
California wt brass liners
~ Moisture(%): Moisture, expressed as a water content.
Pl: Plasticity Index, percent
SA: Sieve analysis (percent passing No. 200 Sieve)
UC: Unconfined compressive strength test, Qu, in ksf
WA: Wash sieve (percent passing No. 200 Sieve)
~ Pitcher Sample
~ 2-inch-OD unlined split
~ spoon (SPT)
OTHER GRAPHIC SYMBOLS
----¥ Water level (at time of drilling, ATD)
------! Water level (after waiting)
Kil Shelby Tube (Thin-walled, l
~ fixed head)
Minor change in material properties within a
stratum
lnferred/gradational contact between strata
-?-Queried contact between strata
1: Soil classifications are based on the Unified Soil Classification System. Descriptions and stratum lines are interpretive, and actual lithologic changes may be
gradual. Field descriptions may have been modified to reflect results of lab tests.
2: Descriptions on these logs apply only at the specific boring locations and at the time the borings were advanced. They are not warranted to be representative
of subsurface conditions at other locations or times.
The Riley Group. Inc.
17522 Bothell Way NE, Bothell, WA 98011
1838 South Washington Street. Kennewick, WA 99337
THE RILEY GROUP,INC.
17522 Bothell Way NE
Bothell, WA 98011
PHONE: (425) 415-0551 •
FAX: (425) 415-0311
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
ASTM D 421, D 2217, D 1140, C 117, D 422, C 136
PROJECT TITLE QFC Fuel Statioo Rentoo I SAMPLE ID/TYPE I B-1 I I PROJECT NO. 2012-345 SAMPLE DEPTH 5'
TECH/DATE ELW 08/9/12
WAT!;B !.QNTENI (D!!!il!ll!:ed Moistyre} Total Weinht Of "'""'"'e U"""' For Sieve Corra::ta:l For H··· ros::o,,;c Moisure
Wt Wet Soil & Tae (gm) (w1) 611.50 Weight Of Sarple(gm) 574.40
Wt Dry Soil & Tae (gm) (w2) 574.40 Tae Weight (gm) 14.20
Weight of Tae (gm) (w3) 14.20 (:NB) Total Dry Weiaht (gm) 560.20
Weight of Wae,; (gm) (w4=w1-w2) 37.10 SI EVE ANALYSIS
Weight of Dry Soil (gm) (w5---w2-w3) 560.20 Cumula:ive
Moisture Content(%) (w4/w5)' 100 6.62 Wt Re! (Wt-Tae] {%R0:8n00) %PASS
+T,.-A { (wt ~§t 100} 11()().'/oret\
% COBBLES 0.00 120" 14.20 0.00 0.00 100.00 oobbles
% CGRAVEL 6.71 3.0" 14.20 0.00 0.00 100.00 COITTie gra,a
% FGRAVEL 17.30 2.5' ooa-re gra,.,el
% CSAND 7.50 2.0' COITTie grave
% M SAND 12.01 1.5' 14.20 0.00 0.00 100.00 coasegrava
% FSAND 27.95 1.0' ooasegrava
% FINES 28.53 0.75' 51.80 37.60 6.71 93.29 fine gravel
%TOTAL 100.00 0.50" finegrava
0.375' 100.10 85.90 15.33 84.67 finegravei
D10 (mm) n/a #4 148.70 134.50 24.01 75.99 ooasesaid
D30(mm) n/a #10 190.70 176.50 31.51 68.49 ma:liumsa,d
D60(nm) n/a #20 ma:liumsaid
Cu n/a #40 258.00 243.80 43.52 56.48 fine said
Cc n/a #60 fine said
#100 357.40 343.20 61.26 38.74 fine said
#200 414.60 400.40 71.47 28.53 fines
PAN 574.40 560.20 100.00 0.00 silt/day
100 ... ·~ ~~-,.
% 90 -80
p 70
~
A ----60
s 50
~
s ......
40
I .........
30 --
N 20
G 10
0
1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
Grain size in millimeters
DESCRIPTION Silty SAND with wme grave
uses SM
The Riley Group, Inc.
THE RILEY GROUP, INC.
17522 Bothell Way NE
Bothell, WA 98011
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
ASTM D 421, D 2217, D 1140, C 117, D 422, C 136
PHONE: (425) 415-0551
FAX: (425) 415-0311
PROJECT TITLE
PROJECT NO.
TECH/DATE
QFC Fuel station Renton SAM PLE ID/TYPE ~--=B-=-2'---'!'------11
2012-345 SAMPLE DEPTH . 2.5" .
ELW 08/9/12
WATER CONTENT (Delivered Moisture}
Wt Wei. Soi I & T a-e (gm) ( w 1 ) 1---"43;.;.1 ;.;.· 40;;_-I
Tota Wag ht Of Sanple Used For S 61/e Corrected For Hyqros::opic Moisture
Waght Of Sa-rple (gm) 399.10
Wt Dry Soil & Ta-e(gm)
WaghtofTa-e(gm)
Waght of Wfl.e: (gm)
Waght of Dry Soil (gm)
Moisture Content(%)
% COBBLES
% CGRAVEL
% FGRAVEL
% CSAND
% M SAND
% FSAND
% FINES
% TOTAL
D10 (mm)
D30 (rrm)
D60(mm)
Cu
Cc
100
% 90
80
p 70
A 60
s 50
s 40
I 30
N 20
G 10
0
1000
0.00
3.66
27.30
13.97
22.91
18.70
13.45
100.00
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
100
Ta-e Waght (gm) 14.10
(W6) Tota Dry Waqht 1nm) 385.00
SIEVE ANALYSIS
(w2)1--;::;399;.;;;.;..1 o;;_-1
(w3)1-...;1..:.4·c;.10::_-+----==-"-'"'--..:.;:::::,..:===='-_J'--=='--...,_-I
(w4---.v1-w2)1--..c32;;;;.30.c..c...---1
(w5--""'2-w3)1--;::;385=·00;;_-1
(w4/w51• 100 8.39
-· .. ·~-
......
10
12.0"
3.0""
2.5"
2.0""
1.5"
1.0"
0.75""
0.50"
0.375""
#4
#10
#20
#40
#60
#100
#200
PAN
Wt Rei.
!:Ii!ll
14.10
14.10
14.10
28.20
71.90
133.30
187.10
275.30
329.70
347.30
399.10
1
(Wt-T,i:e)
0.00
0.00
0.00
14.10
57.80
119.20
173.00
261.20
315.60
333.20
385.00
~ ..
Grain size in millimeters
Cumulftive
{°iq~cin€d) %PASS
{(wt r~§)*100} (100-%retl
0.00 100.00 cobbles
0.00 100.00 ooa-se gra,e
ooa-se grave
coa-se grave
0.00 100.00 coa-se gravel
coa-se grave
3.66 96.34 fine grave
fine gravel
15.01 84.99 finegra,e
30.96 69.04 coa-se s,nd
44.94 55.06 medium sa,d
medium s,nd
67.84 32.16 fine8'11d
fine 8'l1d
81.97 18.03 fine 8'l1d
86.55 13.45 fines
100.00 0.00 sit/day
0.1 0.01 0.001
DESCRIPTION I""-''~'"
uses . S'v1 I
The Riley Group, Inc.
~TENW
Transportation Engineering NorthWest
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
September 10, 2012
Arneta Henniger
City of Renton
Jeff Haynie, P.E.
TENW
SUBJECT: QFC #871 Fuel Center -4th & Duvall
Traffic Impact Analysis
TENW Project No. 4594
SEp 2 6 l/iJ;
This memorandum documents the traffic impact analysis completed for the proposed QFC Fuel
Center located at the intersection of NE 4,h Si/Duvall Ave NE (4 1h & Duvall) in the City of Renton.
Executive Summary
Proposal. The proposed QFC Fuel Center project site is located at 4615 NE 4,h St (SW corner of
4,h & Duvall) in Renton, WA. The projecl would include a new fuel center with o cashier's kiosk
and IO vehicle fueling positions. The site is currently vacant but was previously occupied by a gas
station wilh 4 vehicle fueling positions. Vehicular access would be provided al one driveway on
NE 41h St and one driveway on Duvall Ave NE. The driveway on NE 4th St was analyzed as a
righl-in, right-out only driveway. The projecl is expected to be completed in 2013.
Trip Generalion. The proposed QFC fuel cenler is eslimated to generate a total of 704 weekday
daily !rips of which 64 trips would occur during lhe weekday PM peak hour. These ore gross trip
estimates and do nol include credit for lhe previous gas station on the site.
Traffic Operations Analysis. The two proposed site driveways and the intersection of NE 4,h
St/Duvall Ave NE ore expected to operate at acceptable levels with the proposed project.
Queues from the 4th & Duvall intersection will occosionally block the driveways to the site during
the PM peak hour, but they ore not expected to severely impact driveway operations or safety.
On-Site Queuing & Circulation. The proposed fuel station will provide space for IO vehicles at the
fuel dispensers and at least 16 additional vehicles queued behind fueling vehicles while
maintaining room for circulalion belween driveways and vehicular access to/from NE 4th Street
and Duvall Ave NE. Based on our experience on similar facilities, the proposed on-site queuing
area is sufficient ta accommodate the expected demand.
Miligalion. Based on our findings, the proposed project would not have a significant adverse
impact an the transporlation system. The Cily of Rentan's currently adopted transportation impact
fee is $75.00 per net new daily trip generated. For impact fee purposes, the trip generation
estimate should account for credit from the previous gas slation on the site. With IO proposed
vehicle fueling positions and a grass trip generation of 704 daily trips, the impact fee should
include a 40% reduction to account the previous gos station with 4 vehicle fueling positions. Thus,
the net impact fee far the project is calculaled to be $31 680 [704 X $75 X 11-0.40)]. The
impact fee is required to be paid prior to the issuance of a building permil.
Transportation Planning I Design J Traffic Impact & Operations
816 -6" Street South. Kirkland, WA 98033 I Office (425) 889-6747
QFC Fuel Center -41r, & Duvall Traffic Impact Analysis
Introduction
The scope of the traffic analysis was based on our scoping discussion on Tuesday August 14,
2012. The following items are addressed in this traffic impact analysis:
• Project description
• Trip generation
• Trip distribution and assignment
• Traffic volume forecasts
• Traffic operations analysis (2 project driveways and 4th & Duvall)
• On-site queuing/ circulation
• Mitigation
Project Description
The proposed OFC Fuel Center project site is located at 4615 NE 4rh St (SW corner of 4th &
Duvall) in Renton, WA (see Figure l, site vicinity). The project would include a new fuel center
with a cashier's kiosk and l O vehicle fueling positions. The site is currently vacant but was
previously occupied by a gas station with 4 vehicle fueling positions (from 1960 until approx.
2007). Vehicular access would be provided at one driveway on NE 4,h St and one driveway on
Duvall Ave NE. The driveway on NE 4th St was analyzed as a right-in, right-out only driveway.
The proiecl is expected to be completed in 2013. A p1eliminrny site pion is provided in Figure 2.
Trip Generation
The weekday daily and PM peak hour trip generation estimates for the proposed fuel facility were
based on methodology documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Genera/Jon
Manual, gth Edition for Gasoline/Service Station (LUC 944).
To determine the primary trips associated with the fuel facility, reductions to the gross trip
generation estimates were mode to account far "QFC-linked" and pass-by trips. Primary trips are
trips made for the specific purpose of visiting the generator (e.g. fuel facility). Unlike OFC-linked
and pass-by trips, primary trips would be considered "new" trips to the overall city-wide street
network.
QFC/inked Trips. This project is unique in that it is a proposed fuel center associated with the
existing OFC supermarket located on the northeast corner of 4th & Duvall. QFC rewards card
members will receive a discount on gos at the proposed gas station. Fred Meyer stores have a
similar program, and studies conducted by Fred Meyer in 2002 indicated a 39% shared trip role
(39% of gas station customers also made a stop at the adjacent store). For this study, OFC-linked
trips were quantified similar to how internal trips are estimated for a development using rates
included in the ITE Trip Genera/1on Handbook, 2°d edition, 2004. On a daily basis, ii is
estimated that al multi-use developments 28% of retail trips are shared between adjacent uses
within a site. During the PM peak hour, it is estimated that 20% of retail trips are shared between
adjacent uses within a site.
~TENW September 10, 2012
Page 2
II
@
I
Kennydale
NE 27tt, St
Mavvr
S 2nd St
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
~TENW
QFC Fuel Center -41h & Duvall Traff:c Impact Analysis
.,.,.
89r~,, ,.
May
Cree~
Pa,k
NE 4th SI
Bo1er1
P;.ir~;
= z
l -~
NE 4th St 8
Coug.i11
SE 128th St
Gree,-,wood
f·/.e,,or.~i
rark ~--.L..~
Project
Site
Maplewood
,
~ ,,
6. :e
~
sr ?nd r,
Maplewood
P.:irk
i
Ron ~
Regb, ;:;
P;:nk
Elliott
"'"' S[ fdirh
® 2-J~L NA\•TEO Ci 2·::>i2 Mk:ro;oft \;?!Poratior·
September 10, 2012
Page 3
. , . ;,
;;;;;.,;• . ·-··-
•. I'
·oo· ..
• •• •
'i.'
(!) .. : ....
! .. · ..
QFC Fuel Center -41M & Duva:1 Traffic Impact Analysis
. . . . . . I ;; .=tr, ..;.....::.....;..· .:.' .,..· ..... ·_;L,_.:J· _L . . . ~ .. .. '
. . . . . ... \• . . .. ,
''.
i',
l ::
)
•~ I r--------
1
I i ,.~ i-r-
' I ! I
! I
~u \\ i tU
...... 1.. ,··
I
f-t",
Preliminary site plan provided by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. September 4, 2012. N
Figure 2: Preliminary Site Plan
~TENW
(!)
September 10, 2012
Page 4
QFC Fue' Center -4·11 & Duva!! Traific Impact Analysis
The use of the ITE rotes to account for QFC-linked trips is conservative when compared lo the
shored trip rote from t~e Fred Meyer studies. QFC-linked hps ore included in the project trip
assignment at the driveways and at the intersection of 4th & Duvall, but would not be considered
new trips lo the citywide street network.
Pass-By Trips. Pass-by trips are trips that are made by vehicles that are already on the adjacent
streets and make intermediate slops at a commercial use on route to a primary destination (e.g. on
the way from work to home). Therefore, poss-by trips for this project would be trips that are
already passing by the site on NE 4,h Street or Duvall Ave NE. The pass-by trips associated with
the proposed fuel facility were determined based on studies documented in the ITE Tnp Genera/ion
Handbook. Based on Table 5.28 of the ITE Handbook, the average pass-by rate for
gasoline/service stations is 42% during the weekdoy PM peak hour. No poss-by data was
provided for gasoline/service stations on a daily basis. Therefore, the daily pass-by rate was also
estimated to be 42%.
The new primary trips from the proposed fuel facility were colculated by subtracting the OFC-linked
and pass-by trips from the gross trips. It should be noted that for the traffic operations analysis, no
trip credit hos been taken lo account for the gas station that previously occupied the site.
The weekday daily and PM peak hour trip generation estimates are summarized in Table l.
Detailed trip generation calculations are included in Attachment A
Table 1
Trip Generation Summary
Trips Generated
Time Period In Out Total
Weekday Daily
Gross Trips 843 843 l.686
Less QFC-linked Trips [28%) -236 -236 -472
Less Pass-By Trips (42%) -255 -255 -510
Total New Trips (Primary Trips) 352 352 704
Weekday PM Peak Hour
Gross Trips 69 70 139
Less QFC-linked Trips [20%) -14 -14 -28
Less Pass-By Trips [42%) -23 -24 -47
Total New Trips (Primary Trips) 32 32 64
As shown in Table l, the proposed fuel facility is estimated lo generate a total of 704 new
weekday daily trips of which 64 trips (32 entering, 32 exiling) would occur during the weekday
PM peak hour. These estimates do nol include credit for the previous gas station on the site.
~TENW September 10, 2012
Page 5
QFC Fuel Center -41h & Duvall Traffic Impact Analysis
Trip Distribution and Assignment
The distribution and assignment of weekday PM peak hour primary and poss-by proiect trips
through the two site driveways and the intersection of NE 4th Street/Duvall Ave NE were based on
existing travel patterns using recent counts conducted at 4th & Duvall. QFC-linked trips were
distributed through the driveways and the study intersection based on likely travel routes between
the QFC supermarket and the proposed fuel center. The distribution and assignment of new
[primary), poss-by, and QFC-linked trips ore shown on Figure 3.
Traffic Volumes Forecasts
Existing weekday PM peak hour traffic counts at 4th & Duvall were conducted on Tuesday, August
14, 2012 by All Traffic Data, Inc. The existing traffic volumes represent the highest hour between
4:00 and 6:00 PM. The 2012 existing PM peak hour traffic volumes at 4th & Duvall ore shown in
Figure 4.
To estimate 2013 without-project baseline traffic volumes, a 2 percent annual growth rate was
applied to the existing volumes as confirmed by the City. The future 2013 without-proiecl PM peak
hour traffic volumes at 4th & Duvall ore shown in Figure 4.
Future 2013 with-proiecl traffic volumes were esti'nated by adding the trip assignments from the
proposed proiect [Figure 31 to the year 2013 without-project volumes. The resulting 2013 with-
project PM peak hour traffic volumes al the two site driveways and at 4th & Duvall are shown in
Figure 4.
Traffic Operations Analysis
The level of service [LOS) and queue analyses at the site driveways and al the intersection of NE
4th Street/Duvall Ave NE were conducted using the methodology and procedures outlined in the
2000 Highway Capacity Manual [HCMI Special Report 209, Transportation Research Boord.
The Synchra software package was used lo determine the reported LOS and queues. Signal
timing at the intersection of NE 4th Street/Duvall Ave NE was provided by the City of Renton. No
changes to the existing intersection signal phasing or geometry were assumed for this analysis.
Level of service [LOS) serves as on indicator of the quality of traffic flow and degree of congestion
at on intersection or roadway segment. It is a measure of vehicle operating speed, travel time,
travel delays, and driving comfort. The LOS for signalized intersections is based on the overage
delay for the intersection as a whole. The LOS results for stop-controlled intersections ore based on
the delay reported for each movement and therefore do not represent the overall operations of the
intersection.
The reported queues ore 95th percentile queues. The estimated
exceeded only 5 percent of the time during the analysis period.
~TENW
95th percentile queues ore
September 10, 2012
Page 6
Primary Trip Distribution and Assignment
~
Pass-By Trip Assignment
QFC -Linked Trips
-11
11-..: ("
, 10
'
Right-in.Right-out
Only Driveway
.g ..... r'
9 "">I. : 12
Right-in, Right-out
Only Driveway
("
' 7
Right-in, Right-out
Only Driveway
QFC Fuel Center -4'h & Duvall Traffic Impact Analysis
NE 4th Street
$i
4..JI
6-+
PROJECT
SITE
19
Full Access ; &-----Driveway
20 JI
2 ......
-3 ;
PROJECT
SITE 13 -1
Full Access ,,) 'f ------Driveway
14
NE 4th Street • 1-"
PROJECT
SITE
14
full Access ; ·-----Driveway
7 JI
EXISTING
QFC
r 11 ~
~ t ("
~ 11 4 5
~
'( ..
~
~ ~
2
'-_1 EXISTING
QFC
("
2
~ t
1 -1
EXISTING
QFC
t
7
~ ,
< f
'( N ..
~ (9
NOTTO SCALE
Figure 3: PM Peak Hour Project Trip Distribution and Assignment
~TENW September I 0, 2012
Page 7
2012 EXISTING
2013 WITHOUT PROJECT
2013 WITH PROJECT
-+-1,060
1,299 ..... ,
._ 1.081
1,:324-+,
-+-1.092
1,315-+ I ('
20 ~: 29
Right-in, Right.-out
Only Driveway
QFC Fuel Center -4'~ & Duvall Traffic Impact Analysis
NE 4th Street
PROJECT
SITE
NE 4th Street
PROJECT
SITE
NE 4th ot
PROJECT
SITE
"-.. 199
342 127 431 .._ 651
EXISTING
QFC
ii* '-..r 34
256 Jf "' t ('
972 -+-l! 67 S3 25
11,._ E
.i
'li
232 > * ll
t
145
'-203 EXISTING
349 130 440 +-664 QFC
ii*""-"35
261 Jf "' t ('
991 _.. !!: 68 54 26
12,._ E
.i
'li
237 ~
* t
148
'-202
346 158 437 +-659
EXISTING
QFC
ii*""-"52
273 Jf "' t ('
999-+ t 87 65 33 12,._ ~
!
" 'li
46 236 ~
N
Full Access ii * " (!) Driveway ------
NOTTO SCALE
Figure 4: PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
~TENW September 10, 2012
Page8
QFC Fuel Center -4th & Duvall Traffic lmpac'. Analysis
Site Access Oi;,erations
Tobie 2 summarizes the results of the LOS and queue analysis conducted at the two site driveways
for 2013 with-proiect conditions. The LOS and queue calculation sheets are included in
Attachment B.
Table 2
2013 PM Peak Hour Site Access LOS and Queue Summary
2013 Future Conditions with Project
Site Driveway
NE 41, Street / Site Driveway
NB Right (exiting)
Duvall Avenue/ Site Driveway
EB Shared Left-Right (exiting)
NB Shared Left-Thru [entering)
LOS 1
C
B
A
Delay (sec)
15.7
11.8
0.2
1 LOS"" Level of Service, reported by movement for unsignalized intersections.
Queue 111)2
<25'
<25'
O'
2 Queues are 951h Percentile queues. <25' indicates 951h Percentile queue statistically less than l vehicle.
As shown in Table 2, the controlled movements at the two site driveways are expected to operate
at acceptable levels [LOS C or belier) in 2013 with the proiect The HCM results show 95th
percentile queues that are all statistically less than l vehicle [25 feet) for all the conlrolled
movements entering and exiting the site.
The unsignalized HCM results at the site driveways disclosed above do not account for eastbound
or northbound queues extending from the traffic signal at NE 4th Street/Duvall Ave NE that will
occasionally impact driveway operations during the PM peak hour. These queue interactions are
discussed in the next section.
41h & Duvall Oi;,erations
Tables 3 and 4 summarize the results of the LOS and queue analysis conducted at the intersection
of NE 4,h Street/Duvall Ave NE for 20 l 2 existing and future 2013 conditions. The queue
analysis at 4th & Duvall was conducted on the northbound and eastbound approaches to evaluate
queue interactions with the proiecl site driveways. The LOS and queue calculation sheets are
included in Attachment B.
~TENW September 10, 2012
Page 9
QFC Fuel Center -4·~ & Duvall Traffic Impact Analys's
Table 3
PM Peak Hour LOS Summary -4th & Duvall
Intersection
NE 41h St/Duvall Ave NE
1 LOS= Level of Service
Table 4
2012 Existing
Delay
LOS 1 (sec) v/c
C 33.4 0.75
2013 Without Project
Delay
LOS 1 (sec) V/C
C 33.8 0.77
PM Peak Hour Queue Summary-4th & Duvall
95th Percentile Queue (ft)'
2012 2013 Without 2013 With
Intersection Existing Project Project
Duvall Ave/NE 41h Street
EB Left 150 150 175
EB Thru 425 425 475
EB Thru-Right 425 425 475
NB Shared Left-Thru-Right 175 200 275
1 Queues are Synchro queues rounded to the nearest 25 feet.
2013 With Project
Delay
LOS 1 (sec) v/c
D 37.2 0.82
The results of the LOS analysis in Table 3 show that the intersection of NE 4,h Street/Duvall Ave NE
is expected to operate at acceptable levels [LOS D) with the project in 2013. Project traffic would
result in delay increases of less than 4 seconds per vehicle.
As shown in Tobie 4, the queue results indicate that the eastbound queues extending from the traffic
signal at 4th & Duvall will periodically block the proposed gas station driveway on NE 4th Street
[located approximately 125 feet west of Duvall) during the PM peak hour. Given the relative
frequency of blockage and relatively heavy traffic volumes on NE 4th Street (over 1,300 eastbound
through vehicles in the PM peak hour), the assumed right-in, right-out restriction will help to minimize
delays and ensure safe operations at this driveway. The right-in, right-out restriction is also
consistent with the future median improvements shown in the City of Renton's NE 3,d-41h Comdor
Improvements (Moy 2005). When eastbound queues extend beyond the driveway, it is assumed
that courteous drivers on NE 4,h Street will allow fuel customers to turn right out of the site,
particularly as gaps ore created when the queue dissipates on a green signal phase. Customers
may also choose to exit the site on Duvall Ave NE where blocking will be less frequent.
~TENW September 10, 2012
PagelO
QFC Fuel Cen'.er-41r & Duva·1 Traffic Impact Analys;s
The queue results in Table 4 also show that the northbound queues extending fro11 the traffic signal
at 4rh & Duvall will occasionally block the proposeo gos slotion driveway on Duvall (located
opproxi11otely l 00 feet south of NE 4rh Street) during the PM peak hour. This blockage is
expected to occur less frequenlly than blockages on NE 4th Stteel, and lt0ffic volumes are much
lower (iess than 400 total vehicles northbound and southbound in the PM peak hour). Despite
occasional blockages, the signal will creole gaps in traffic flow that will allow vehicles to exit the
site at regular intervals. This type of driveway operation is not uncommon for gas stations located
on earners of urban intersections. and no adverse operational or safety issues are anticipated. The
City of Renton's NE 3,d.4ih Corridor Improvements study shows planned improvements at 4th &
Duvall, including widening of Duvall ta construct separate northbound left and through-right lanes.
These improvements will likely reduce northbound queues and improve driveway operations in the
future.
On-Site Queuing and Circulation
The proposed fuel station will provide space for l O vehicles at the fuel dispensers and at least 16
additional vehicles queued behind fueling vehicles while maintaining room for circulation between
driveways and vehicular access ta/from NE 4th Street and Duvall Ave NE. A conceptual vehicular
queuing pion is shown in Attachment C. The figure is not intended to show what is expected at
this facility. Rather, it demonstrates what might be considered a 'worst case' or "at capacity"
scenario of vehicle queuing on·site. The proposed diagonal layout of the fuel dispensers is
advantageous as it provides more space far on·site queuing than an orthogonal layout. Based on
our experience on similar facilities, the proposeo on·site queuing area is sufficient to accommodate
the expected demand.
Mitigation
Based on our findings, the proposed project would not hove a significant adverse impact on the
transportation system. The payment of transportation impact fees will adequately mitigate project
impacts by funding the project's fair share of the cost of the City of Renton's planned transportation
improvements. The City of Renton's currently adopted transportation impact fee is $75.00 per net
new daily trip generated. For impact fee purposes, the trip generation estimate should account for
credit from the previous gos station on the site. With l O proposed vehicle fueling positions and a
gross trip generation of 704 daily trips, the impact fee should include a 40% reduction to account
the previous gas station with 4 vehicle fueling positions. Thus. the net impact fee for the project is
calculated to be $31 680 [704 X $75 X ( 1-0.40)]. The impact fee is required to be paid prior to
the issuance of a building permit.
If you have any questions regarding he information presented in this analysis, please coll me at
425·25(}5001 or email at haynie@tenw.com.
cc: Bob McNeil!, Barghousen
Chris Ferko, Barghausen
Joel Howitt, Barghausen
Chris Forster, Project Manager, TENW
~TENW September 10. 2012
Page 11
QFC Fuel Center 41h & Duvall Traffic Impact Analysis
ATTACHMENT A
Trip Generation
Land Use
Daily
Fueling Center
QFC-linked trips 2
Pass-by Trips 2
PM Peak Hour
Fueling Center
QFC-linked trips 2
Pass-by Trips 2
Notes:
QFC Fuel Center -4th and Duvall
Trip Generation Summary
ITE Directional S12:lit Trii:2 Rate
Size Units 1 LUC' In Out Total
10 Fueling Positions 944 50% 50% 168.56
28%
42%
Net Daily Trips =
10 Fueling Positions 944 50% 50% 13.87
20%
42%
Net PM Peak Hour Trips =
1 lnstitu1e of Transportation Engineers, Trip Genemtion Manual, 8th Edition, 2008 Land Use Codes.
Trios Generated
In Out Total
843 843 1,686
-236 -236 -472
607 607 1,214
-255 -255 -510
352 352 704
69 70 139
-14 -14 -28
55 56 111
-23 -24 -47
32 32 64
2 Rates determined based on data included in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition. QFC-tinked trips based on internal trip methodology.
QFC Fuel Center--41h & Duvall Traffic Impact Analysis
ATTACHMENT B
LOS/Queue Worksheets
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
2: Drivewal & NE 4th ST -Movement EBT
Lane Configurations tf.
Volume (veh/h) 1315
Sign Control Free
Grade 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 1429
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC 1, stage 1 con! vol
vC2, stage 2 con! vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
pO queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction Lane # EB1
Volume Total 953
Volume Left 0
Volume Right 0
cSH 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.56
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0
Control Delay (s) 0.0
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s) 0.0
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
QFC Renton Highlands Fuel Center
2013 With Project PM Peak Hour
~
EBR
20
0.92
22
EB2
498
0
22
1700
0.29
0
0.0
'f -"' I'
WBL WBT NBL NBR
++ 'f'
0 1092 0 29
Free Stop
0% 0%
0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
0 1187 0 32
None
205
0.82
1451 2034 726
1451 1815 726
4.1 6.8 6.9
2.2 3.5 3.3
100 100 91
463 57 367
WB1 WB2 NB1
593 593 32
0 0 0
0 0 32
1700 1700 367
0.35 0.35 0.09
0 0 7
0.0 0.0 15.7
C
0.0 15.7
C
0.2
47.0% ICU Level of Service
15
A
8/22/2012
Synchro 8 Report
Page 3
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: Duvall Av NE & Drivewai
..>
Movem!lf\! EBl
Lane Configurations ¥
Volume (vehlh) 38
Sign Control Stop
Grade 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 41
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 448
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 448
IC, single (s) 6.4
IC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 3.5
pO queue free % 93
cM capacity (veh/h) 567
Direction Lane # EB1
Volume Total 45
Volume Left 41
Volume Right 3
cSH 578
Volume to Capacity 0.08
Queue Length 95th (ft) 6
Control Delay (s) 11.8
Lane LOS B
Approach Delay (s) 11.8
Approach LOS B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
QFC Renton Highlands Fuel Center
2013 With Project PM Peak Hour
" ~ t ! ~
EBR NBl IIIBT SBT SBR
4' f.
3 3 147 236 46
Free Free
0% 0%
0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
3 3 160 257 50
None None
166
282 307
282 307
6.2 4.1
3.3 2.2
100 100
757 1254
NIH SB1
163 307
3 0
0 50
1254 1700
0.00 0.18
0 0
0.2 0.0
A
0.2 0.0
1.1
25.2% ICU Level of Service
15
A
8/22/2012
Synchro 8 Report
Page4
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
1: Duvall Av NE & NE 4th ST .,,.
Movement EBL
Lane Configurations 'I
Volume (vph) 256
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900
Lane Width 11
Total Lost time (s) 3.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00
Frt 1.00
Flt Protected 0.95
Satd. Flow (prot) 1728
Flt Penmitted 0.95
Satd. Flow (eerm) 1728
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 272
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 272
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Hea:0: Vehicles(%) 1%
Tum Type Prat
Protected Phases 5
Penmitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s) 21.3
Effective Green, g (s) 23.3
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19
Clearance Time (s) 5.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 335
vis Ratio Prat c0.16
vis Ratio Perm
vie Ratio 0.81
Unifonm Delay, d1 46.3
Progression Factor 0.78
Incremental Delay, d2 1.4
Delay (s) 37.7
Level of Service D
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summ!}'.
HCM 2000 Control Delay
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
C Critical Lane Group
QFC Renton Highlands Fuel Center
2012 Existing PM Peak Hour
-EBT
tf.
972
1900
11
3.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.99
1.00
3413
1.00
3413
0.94
1034
4
1106
1%
NA
2
50.3
52.3
0.44
5.0
4.0
1487
c0.32
0.74
28.3
0.51
0.3
14.7
B
19.2
B
~ f -'-~
EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL
'I tt 'f
71 34 651 199 67
1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
12 11 11 11 12
3.0 3.0 3.0
1.00 0.95 1.00
1.00 1.00 0.96
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 0.85
0.95 1.00 1.00
1711 3421 1472
0.95 1.00 1.00
1711 3421 1472
0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.86
76 36 693 212 78
0 0 0 149 0
0 36 693 63 0
2 6
1% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Prat NA Penm Split
1 6 4
6
4.8 33.8 33.8
6.8 35.8 35.8
0.06 0.30 0.30
5.0 5.0 5.0
3.0 4.0 4.0
96 1020 439
0.02 0.20
0.04
0.38 0.68 0.14
54.6 37.0 30.9
1.27 0.90 1.59
2.4 3.5 0.7
71.6 36.9 49.7
E D D
41.1
D
33.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service
0.75
120.0 Sum of lost time (s)
71.5% ICU Level of Service
15
t ,,. ~
NBT NBR SBL
4> 'I
53 25 431
1900 1900 1900
11 12 11
3.0 30
1.00 0.95
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0.98 1.00
0.98 0.95
1712 1625
0.98 0.95
1712 1625
0.86 0.86 0.90
62 29 479
6 0 0
163 0 307
8
2% 2% 2%
NA Split
4 3
15.2 29.7
17.2 31.7
0.14 0.26
5.0 5.0
4.0 4.0
245 429
c0.10 c0.19
0.67 0.72
48.7 40.1
1.00 1.00
7.3 6.0
56.0 46.1
E D
56.0
E
C
12.0
C
8/22/2012
+ ./
SBT SBR
4' 'f
127 342
1900 1900
11 11
3.0 3.0
0.95 1.00
1.00 0.98
1.00 1.00
1.00 0.85
0.97 1.00
1665 1496
0.97 1.00
1665 1496
0.90 0.90
141 380
0 280
313 100
6
2% 2%
NA Perm
3
3
29.7 29.7
31.7 31.7
0.26 0.26
5.0 5.0
4.0 4.0
439 395
0.19
O.Q7
0.71 0.25
40.0 34.8
1.00 1.00
5.8 0.5
45.8 35.3
D D
41.9
D
Synchro 8 Report
Page 2
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
1: Duvall Av NE & NE 4th ST
.,.,.
Movement EBL
Lane Configurations 'I
Volume (vph) 261
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900
Lane Width 11
Total Lost time (s) 3.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00
Frt 1.00
Flt Protected 0.95
Satd. Flow (prot) 1728
Flt Permitted 0.95
Satd. Flow (eerm) 1728
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 278
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 278
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Heavi Vehicles(%) 1%
Turn Type Prat
Protected Phases 5
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s) 21.4
Effective Green, g (s) 23.4
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19
Clearance Time (s) 5.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 336
v/s Ratio Pro\ c0.16
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio 0.83
Uniform Delay, d1 46.4
Progression Factor 0.78
Incremental Delay, d2 1.6
Delay (s) 37.7
Level of Service D
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
lntffleCtlon Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
C Critical Lane Group
QFC Renton Highlands Fuel Center
2013 Without Project PM Peak Hour
-EST
+i.
991
1900
11
3.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.99
1.00
3414
1.00
3414
0.94
1054
4
1127
1%
NA
2
50.0
52.0
0.43
5.0
4.0
1479
c0.33
0.76
28.8
0.51
0.3
15.1
B
19.6
B
.,. f -' ~
EBR ltl$L war WBR Nal
'I ++ 7'
72 35 664 203 68
1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
12 11 11 11 12
3.0 3.0 3.0
1.00 0.95 1.00
1.00 1.00 0.96
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 0.85
0.95 1.00 1.00
1711 3421 1472
0.95 1.00 1.00
1711 3421 1472
0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.86
77 37 706 216 79
0 0 0 152 0
0 37 706 64 0
2 6
1% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Prat NA Perm Split
1 6 4
6
4.8 33.4 33.4
6.8 35.4 35.4
0.06 0.29 0.29
5.0 5.0 5.0
3.0 4.0 4.0
96 1009 434
0.02 0.21
0.04
0.39 0.70 0.15
54.6 37.6 31.2
1.27 0.90 1.60
2.5 3.9 0.7
72.0 37.7 50.4
E D D
41.9
D
33.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service
0.77
120.0 Sum of lost time (s)
72.4% ICU Level of Service
15
t I" \.
NBT NBR Sl!L
4+ 'I
54 26 440
1900 1900 1900
11 12 11
3.0 3.0
1.00 0.95
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0.98 1.00
0.98 0.95
1711 1625
0.98 0.95
1711 1625
0.86 0.86 0.90
63 30 489
6 0 0
166 0 313
8
2% 2% 2%
NA Split
4 3
15.3 29.9
17.3 31.9
0.14 0.27
5.0 5.0
4.0 4.0
246 431
c0.10 c0.19
0.67 0.73
48.7 40.1
1.00 1.00
7.8 6.4
56.4 46.5
E D
56.4
E
C
12.0
C
8/22/2012
~ ..,,
SBT !BR
<f 7'
130 349
1900 1900
11 11
3.0 3.0
0.95 1.00
1.00 0.98
1.00 1.00
1.00 0.85
0.97 1.00
1665 1496
0.97 1.00
1665 1496
0.90 0.90
144 388
0 285
320 103
6
2% 2%
NA Perm
3
3
29.9 29.9
31.9 31.9
0.27 0.27
5.0 5.0
4.0 4.0
442 397
0.19
0.07
0.72 0.26
40.0 34.7
1.00 1.00
6.2 0.5
46.2 35.2
D D
42.1
D
Synchro 8 Report
Page 2
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
1: Duvall Av NE & NE 4th ST
.>
Movement EBL
Lane Configurations 11
Volume (vph) 273
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900
Lane Width 11
Total Lost time ( s) 3.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00
Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00
Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00
Frt 1.00
Flt Protected 0.95
Satd. Flow (prot) 1728
Flt Permitted 0.95
Said. Flow (eerm) 1728
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 290
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 290
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Heavl Vehicles(%) 1%
Turn Type Prot
Protected Phases 5
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s) 21.5
Effective Green, g (s) 23.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20
Clearance Time (s) 5.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 338
vis Ratio Prat c0.17
vis Ratio Perm
vie Ratio 0.86
Uniform Delay, d1 46.6
Progression Factor 0.67
Incremental Delay, d2 2.1
Delay (s) 33.6
Level of Service C
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summ!!!}'.
HCM 2000 Control Delay
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
C Critical Lane Group
QFC Renton Highlands Fuel Center
2013 With Project PM Peak Hour
-EBT
tr.
999
1900
11
3.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.99
1.00
3414
1.00
3414
0.94
1063
4
1136
1%
NA
2
46.3
48.3
0.40
5.0
4.0
1374
c0.33
0.83
32.1
0.65
0.6
21.5
C
23.9
C
"'\-., -'-"'\
EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL
11 tt .,,
72 52 659 202 87
1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
12 11 11 11 12
3.0 3.0 3.0
1.00 0.95 1.00
1.00 1.00 0.96
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 0.85
0.95 1.00 1.00
1711 3421 1472
0.95 1.00 1.00
1711 3421 1472
0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.86
77 55 701 215 101
0 0 0 156 0
0 55 701 59 0
2 6
1% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Prot NA Perm Split
1 6 4
6
6.4 31.2 31.2
8.4 33.2 33.2
0.07 0.28 0.28
5.0 5.0 5.0
3.0 4.0 4.0
119 946 407
0.03 0.20
0.04
0.46 0.74 0.15
53.6 39.5 32.7
1.30 0.90 1.64
2.7 5.0 0.7
72.4 40.7 54.5
E D D
45.5
D
37.2 H CM 2000 Level of Service
0.82
120.0 Sum of lost time (s)
74.9% ICU Level of Service
15
t I" \.
NBT NBR SBL
4> 11
65 33 437
1900 1900 1900
11 12 11
3.0 3.0
1.00 0.95
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0.98 1.00
0.98 0.95
1709 1625
0.98 0.95
1709 1625
0.86 0.86 0.90
76 38 486
7 0 0
208 0 326
8
2% 2% 2%
NA Split
4 3
16.8 30.5
18.8 32.5
0.16 0.27
5.0 5.0
4.0 4.0
267 440
c0.12 0.20
0.78 0.74
48.6 39.9
1.00 1.00
14.2 7.0
62.8 46.9
E D
62.8
E
D
12.0
D
812212012
+ .,
SBT SBR
.f .,,
158 346
1900 1900
11 11
3.0 3.0
0.95 1.00
1.00 0.98
1.00 1.00
1.00 0.85
0.98 1.00
1671 1496
0.98 1.00
1671 1496
0.90 0.90
176 384
0 280
336 104
6
2% 2%
NA Perm
3
3
30.5 30.5
32.5 32.5
0.27 0.27
5.0 5.0
4.0 4.0
452 405
c0.20
0.07
0.74 0.26
39.9 34.3
1.00 1.00
6.9 0.5
46.9 34.7
D C
42.4
D
Synchro 8 Report
Page2
Queues
1: Duvall Av NE & NE 4th ST
.,.,. -f -'-
Lan&Gro!!I! EBl EST WSL war WBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 272 1110 36 693 212
vie Ratio 0.81 0.72 0.27 0.68 0.36
Control Delay 38.9 16.0 71.3 39.2 9.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 38.9 16.0 71.3 39.2 9.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 150 421 30 207 26
Queue Length 95th (ft) m151 m395 68 #345 60
Internal Link Dist (ft) 2060 1217
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 125 450
Base Capacity (vph) 352 1549 142 1019 587
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced vie Ratio 0.77 0.72 0.25 0.68 0.36
Intersection Summa!j'.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.
QFC Renton Highlands Fuel Center
2012 Existing PM Peak Hour
t \.
NST $Bl
169 307
0.68 0.72
60.6 49.2
0.0 0.0
60.6 49.2
118 224
186 317
1120
300
266 501
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.64 0.61
I
SBT
313
0.71
48.9
0.0
48.9
228
321
3891
513
0
0
0
0.61
~
S8R
380
0.56
6.6
0.0
6.6
0
73
724
0
0
0
0.52
8/22i2012
Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
Queues
1: Duvall Av NE & NE 4th ST
.,> -• -'-
Lane Groue EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 278 1131 37 706 216
vie Ratio 0.82 0.73 0.28 0.70 0.37
Control Delay 39.0 16.6 71.7 39.9 9.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 39.0 16.6 71.7 39.9 9.7
Queue Length 50th (ft) 159 436 31 212 26
Queue Length 95th (ft) m156 m405 69 #357 61
Internal Link Dist (ft) 2060 1217
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 125 450
Base Capacity (vph) 350 1539 142 1008 586
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced vie Ratio 0.79 0.73 0.26 0.70 0.37
Intersection Summa[l!
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.
QFC Renton Highlands Fuel Center
2013 Without Project PM Peak Hour
t \.
NBT SBL
172 313
0.69 0.72
61.1 49.6
0.0 0.0
61.1 49.6
120 228
188 324
1120
300
267 501
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.64 0.62
!
SBT
320
0.72
49.3
0.0
49.3
233
329
3891
513
0
0
0
0.62
~
SBR
388
0.57
6.6
0.0
6.6
0
73
729
0
0
0
0.53
812212012
Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
Queues
1: Duvall Av NE & NE 4th ST
.,.,. -• -"-
lane Gr0!!(1
..
EBL arr W8I.. war WBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 290 1140 55 701 215
vie Ratio 0.86 0.81 0.41 0.74 0.38
Control Delay 35.4 22.9 77.2 42.4 10.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 35.4 22.9 77.2 42.4 10.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) 181 465 45 210 27
Queue Length 95th (ft) m170 m425 92 #353 61
Internal Link Dist (ft) 125 1217
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 125 450
Base Capacity (vph) 348 1407 142 945 562
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced vie Ratio 0.83 0.81 0.39 0.74 0.38
lntlmection SUmmarv
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.
QFC Renton Highlands Fuel Center
2013 With Project PM Peak Hour
t \.
NBT SBL
215 326
0.78 0.74
67.2 50.2
0.0 0.0
67.2 50.2
153 236
#264 340
86
300
278 501
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.77 0.65
~
SBT
336
0.74
50.1
0.0
50.1
245
347
3891
515
0
0
0
0.65
~
SBR
384
0.56
6.5
0.0
6.5
0
74
726
0
0
0
0.53
8/22/2012
Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
QFC Fuel Center -4-i-, & Duvall Traffic Impact Analysis
ATTACHMENT C
Conceptual On-Site Queue Diagram
------
~:
/I
,~ I 0 /
Y1
j:
Jl1 D 0
0
:1 :·
1: 0
11
1 I jl
,I
QUEUING PLAN
NE 4IH STREET
~
~
" " " ,,
,,' :,
-0
Ol]J
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = --= = = = -
I
w :::> z
~
:I g
Cl
ROAD DEDICATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of
the Northwest Quarter of Section 15, Township 23, Range 5 East, W.M., King County,
Washington, described as follows:
Commencing at a point on East line of said Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter
of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter being South 180.00 feet (as
measured along said East line) of the Northeast comer thereof;
THENCE North 88°03'16" West, paraHel with the North line of said subdivision, 20.00
feet to the West line of the East 20.00 feet of said subdivision, being the West margin
of Duvall Avenue Northeast, as conveyed to King County for road purposes by deed
recorded under recording no. 1804907 and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE continuing North 88°03'16" West, 10.00 feet;
THENCE North 00°38'02" East, parallel with Duvall Avenue Northeast, 110.66 feet;
THENCE North 43°41'48" West, 39.08 feet;
THENCE North 88°03'16" West, 115.90 feet to the East line of the West 150 feet of
said subdivision;
THENCE North 00°41'17" East, 7.00 feet to the South line the North 35 feet of said
subdivision as conveyed to King County for road purposes by deed
recorded under recording no. 5849734;
THENCE South 88°03'16" East, along said South line, 128.78 feet to a point of
curvature to the right;
THENCE southeasterly along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 25.00
feet, through a central angle of 88°41'17", and an arc length of 38.70 feet;
THENCE South 00°38'02" West, 120.56 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Project Name: Quality Food Centers, A Division of Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.
September 11, 2012
15432l.01.doc
Exhibit: 7143EX01.dwg
J ' -
NED DRAWN
N0RJH LINE, NW1/:4. SEC. 15-T2 I N.E. COR, NEl/4, NW1/4, NEl/4, NWl/4
~ NE 41H 8TN!l!!T SEC. 15-T23N, RSE
ROAD OEOIC.ATIOH AREA
Tl NO.
152305-9214
1'-50'
For:
20·
!I!
~
!
.o·
"' IQ
IE
J, -
~
~
i
~
!ii ..., ...... -I ..., -~
~
~
JOB NUMBER
15432
15432L01.doc
1 of 1
Form WA-5 (6/76)
Commitment Face Page
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
Issued by
File No.: NCS-520794-0Rl
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
First American ntle Insurance Company, herein called the Company, for valuable consideration, hereby
commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the
proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagor of the estate or interest covered
hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges
therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations
hereof.
This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount
of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either
at the time of the issuance of the Commitment or by subsequent endorsement.
This Commitment if preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all
liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the effective date
hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that
the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. This Commitment shall not
be valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized officer or agent.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this commitment to be signed and sealed, to
become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance
with its By-Laws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date."
First Ameriam Title Insurance Company
~U~~· President By:
Attest: IJ1 u,l /_ ~ Secretary
By: ~T ~ Countersigned
First American Tltle Insurance Company
Form WA-5 (6/76)
Commitment
--4-/% ....,,._
File No.: NCS-520794-0R!
Page No. 1
First American Title Insurance Company
National Commercial Services
200 SW Market Street, Suite 250, Portland, OR 97201
To:
(503)795-7600 FAX (866)678-0591
Rachael Rodgers
(503)795-7608
rrodgers@firstam.com
Fred Meyer Stores, Inc
3800 SE 22nd Avenue, M/S 23C,
Portland, OR 97202-2999
Attn: Ginger Pullen
REPORT NO. 2
SCHEDULE A
1. Commitment Date: July 20, 2012 at 7:30 A.M.
2. Policy or Policies to be issued:
AMOUNT
Standard Owners Coverage $ 465,000.00 $
Proposed Insured:
Quality Food Centers, a Division of Fred Meyer Stores, Inc
Melinda Dee Sylvester
(503)795-7697
mdsylvester@firstam.com
File No.: NCS·S20794-0R1
Your Ref No.: QFC Renton/
Northeast 4th Street and Duvall
PREMIUM TAX
To follow $ To follow
3. The estate or interest in the land described on Page 2 herein is Fee Simple, and title thereto is
at the effective date hereof vested in:
·Eastside Funding LLC
4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
The land referred to in this report is described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
First American Title Insurance Company
Form WA-5 (6/76)
Commitment
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
\
EXHIBIT 'A'
File No.: NCS-520794-0Rl
Page No. 2
THE NORTH 180 FEET (AS MEASURED ALONG THE EAST LINE) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTlON 15,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT THE WEST 150 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THE EAST 20 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1804907;
AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 35 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5849734;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF THE ARC OF A CIRCLE HAVING A RADIUS OF 25
FEET, SAID CIRCLE BEING TANGENT TO A LINE 35 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF
SAID SUBDIVISION AND TANGENT TO A LINE 20 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID
SUBDIVISION AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR S.E. 128TH STREET BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 24, 1987
UNDER RECORDING NO. 8706241488.
Rrst American Title Insurance Company
Form WA-5 (6/76)
Commitment
SCHEDULE B -SECTION 1
REQUIREMENTS
The following are the Requirements to be complied with:
)
File No.: NCS-520794-0Rl
Page No. 3
Item (A) Payment to or for the account of the Grantors or Mortgagors of the full consideration for the
estate or interest to be insured.
Item (B) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly
filed for record.
Item (C) Pay us the premiums, fees and charges for the policy.
Item (D) You must tell us in writing the name of anyone not referred to in this Commitment who will
get an interest in the land or who will make a loan on the land. We may then make
additional requirements or exceptions
SCHEDULE B -SECTION 2
GENERAL EXCEPTIONS
The Policy or Policies to be issued will contain Exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed
of to the satisfaction of the Company.
A. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing
authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records.
B. Any facts, rights, interest, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could
be asoertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of person in possession thereof.
C. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records.
D. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts
which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records.
E. (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the
issuance thereof; (3) Water rights, claims or title to water; whether or not the matters excepted
under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records; (4) Indian Tribal Codes or Regulations,
Indian Treaty or Aboriginal Rights, including easements or equitable servitudes.
F. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, materials or medical assistance theretofore or
hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records.
G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, construction, tap or reimbursement
charges/costs for sewer, water, garbage or electricity.
H. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in
the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the
proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgages thereon
covered by this Commitment.
Rrst American Title Insurance Company
Form WA-5 (6/76)
Commitment
File No.: NCS-520794-0Rl
Page No. 4
SCHEDULE B -SECTION 2
(continued)
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS
1. Lien of the Real Estate Excise Sales Tax and Surcharge upon any sale of said premises, if
unpaid. As of the date herein, the excise tax rate for the City of Renton is at 1.78%.
Levy/Area Code: 2100
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
For all transactions recorded on or after July 1, 2005:
• A fee of $10.00 will be charged on all exempt transactions;
• A fee of $5.00 will be charged on all taxable transactions in addition to the
excise tax due.
Delinquent General Taxes for the year 2012, plus interest and penalties.
Tax Account No.: 152305-9124-03
Amount Billed: $ 5,856.17
Amount Paid: $ 0.00
Amount Due:
Assessed Land Value:
$
$
Assessed Improvement Value: $
6,207.55
441,800.00
0.00
Delinquent General Taxes for the year 2011, plus interest and penalties.
Tax Account No.: 152305-9124-03
Amount Billed:
Amount Paid:
Amount Due:
Assessed Land Value:
$
$
$
$
Assessed Improvement Value: $
5,408.24
0.00
6,814.39
441,800.00
0.00
Delinquent General Taxes for the year 2010, plus interest and penalties.
Tax Account No.: 152305-9124-03
Amount Billed:
Amount Paid:
Amount Due:
Assessed Land Value:
$
$
$
$
Assessed Improvement Value: $
City liens if any of the City of Renton
4,925.34
0.00
6,796.97
441,800.00
0.00
Reservations and exceptions, including the terms and conditions thereof:
Reserving: Mineral
Reserved By: Northern Pacific Railroad Company
Recorded:
Recording Information:
Undisclosed
192430
First American Title Insurance Company
Form WA-5 (6/76)
Commitment
File No.: NCS-520794-0RI
Page No. s
Note: No examination has been made to determine the present record owner of the above
minerals, or mineral lands and appurtenant rights thereto, or to determine matters which may
affect the lands or rights so reserved
7. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein:
Recording Information: June 3, 1982 under Recording No. 8206030188
For: Drainfield
Affects: as described therein
8. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon said premises for King County as granted by
deed recorded June 24, 1987 under Recording No. 8706241488.
9. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Ordinance No. 4612"
recorded June 21, 1996 as Recording No. 9606210966 of Official Records.
10. Deed of Trust and the terms and conditions thereof.
Grantor/Trustor:
Grantee/Beneficiary:
Trustee:
Amount:
Recorded:
Recording Information:
Sandjay, LLC & Synnex, LLC
Eastside Funding, LLC, a Washington limited liability company
Cascade Trustee Services, Inc.
$564,840.02
January 22, 2007
20070122001941
11. Any right, asserted right, or challenge, made by any party, including, but not limited to, a
creditor, trustee or debtor in possession in bankruptcy to avoid or invalidate that certain
conveyancing document which recorded December 31, 2009 as Recorders No.
20091231000304 of Official Records.
12. Evidence of the authority of the individual(s) to execute the forthcoming document for Eastside
Funding, LLC, copies of the current operating agreement should be submitted prior to closing.
13. Evidence of the authority of the officers of Quality Food Centers, a Division of Fred Meyer Stores,
Inc, to execute the forthcoming instrument, copies of the current Articles of Incorporation, By-
laws and certified copies of appropriate resolutions should be submitted prior to closing.
14. Unrecorded leaseholds, if any, rights of vendors and security agreement on personal property
and rights of tenants, and secured parties to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term.
Rrst American Title Insurance Company
Form WA-5 (6/76)
Commitment
File No.: NCS-520794-0R!
Page No. 6
INFORMATIONAL NOTES
A. Effective January 1, 1997, and pursuant to amendment of Washington State Statutes relating to
standardization of recorded documents, the following format and content requirements must be
met. Failure to comply may result in rejection of the document by the recorder.
-,
B. Any sketch attached hereto is done so as a courtesy only and is not part of any title commitment
or policy. It is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and First
American expressly disclaims any liability which may result from reliance made upon it.
C. The description can be abbreviated as suggested below if necessary to meet standardization
requirements. The full text of the description must appear in the document(s) to be insured.
Ptn Sec 15, 23N, SE, WM, NW qtr
APN: 152305-9124-03
D. According to the application for title insurance, title is to vest in Quality Food Centers, a Division
of Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.
Examination of the records discloses no matters pending against said party(ies).
E. A fee will be charged upon the cancellation of this Commitment pursuant to the Washington
State Insurance Code and the filed Rate Schedule of the Company.
END OF SCHEDULE B
cc: Demetry Vyzis, CB Richard Ellis
First American Title Insurance Company
Form WA-5 (6/76)
Commitment
First American Title Insurance Company
National Commercial Services
COMMITMENT
Conditions and Stipulations
File No.: NCS-520794-0Rl
Page No. 7
1. The term "mortgage" when used herein shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security
instrument.
2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of a defect, lien, encumbrance,
adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by
this Commitment, other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such
knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or
damage resulting from any act or reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by
failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclosure such knowledge
to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien,
encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option, may amend Schedule B
of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability
previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations.
3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured
and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of Policy or Policies
committed for, and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith
(a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B,
or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this
Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the
Policy or Policies committed for and such liability is subject to the Insuring provisions, exclusion
from coverage, and the Conditions and Stipulations of the form of Policy or Policies committed for
in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by references, and are made a
part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein.
4. Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises out of the
status of the title to the estate or interest or the lien of the Insured mortgage covered hereby or
any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to the provisions and Conditions and
Stipulations of this Commitment.
Arst American Title Insurance Company
Form WA·S (6/76)
Commitment
• •
The First American Corporation
First American Title Insurance Company
National Commercial Services
PRIVACY POLICY
We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information
File No.: NCS-520794-0R!
Page No. 8
In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certain information. We understand that you may be
concerned about what we will do with such information particularly any personal or financial information. We agree that you have a right to know how
we will utilize the personal information you provide to us. Therefore, together with our parent company, The First American corporation, we have
adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal information.
Applicability
This Privacy Policy governs our use of the information which you provide to us. It does not govern the manner in which we may use information we
have obtained from any other source, such as information obtained from a public record or from another person or entity. First American has also
adopted broader guidelines that govern our use of personal information regardless of its source. First American calls these guidelines its Fair
Information Values, a copy of which can be found on our website at www.firstam.com.
Types of Information
Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing, the types of nonpublic personal information that we may collect include:
• Information we receive from you on applications, forms and in other communications to us, whether in writing, in person, by
telephone or any other means;
• Information about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others; and·
• Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency.
Use of Information
We request information from you for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffiliated party. Therefore, we will not
release your Information to nonaffiliated parties except: (1) as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested of us; or (2) as
permitted by law. We may, however, store such information indefinitely, including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such
information may be used for any internal purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also provide all of the types of
nonpublic personal information listed above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include financial service providers,
such as title insurers, property and casualty insurers, and trust and investment advisory companies, or companies involved in real estate services, such
as appraisal companies, home warranty companies, and escrow companies. Furthermore, we may also provide all the information we collect, as
described above, to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies, or to other financial institutions
with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketing agreements.
Former Customers
Even if you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you.
Confidentiality and Security
We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your information. We restrict access to nonpublic personal
information about you to those individuals and entities who need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We will use our best
efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your Information will be handled responsibly and in accordance with this Privacy
Policy and First American's Fair Information Values. We currently maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal
regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information.
c 2001 The First American Corporation -All Rights Reserved
First American Title Insurance Company
,,
.A~ .,uu ..
{..~/ .. ~
J,.. :l
..v~11"'-" .4'
r:1: : ... /,;'k
I
' '
. ~f
: ... ~_.Ut.4.
• 'f
I
I
t
iJ ~ ,,; .... V 0 i·l I') ~ 0
'" ~ ,1
(1)
Ei, __ '.MENT -AND AGRL '-:HEN'l'
THE PART!ES hereto are RICHARD JOSEPH DJTTENB.ERGER and
Gr.::..ALD RICHARD BELL hereinafter referred to as Bell-Di ttenberger,
a Washington Partnership.: DORIS E. DENNEY, a widow, hereinafter
referred t.o a Denney; and THOMAS E. HOLMAN & ~RRY GRIFFITH.
~alman apd Griffith participate in this transaction as indi\·iduals
anG as a joint venture but dnlicipating t~at their rights and
obligations herein will be assigned and delegated to Renton East
Dairy Queen, Inc., a Washington corporation of Wh:i: "h they will be
principal stockholders. For convenience they are referred to
hereafter as "Renton east". .·
Renton East has heretofore made and entered into a conunercial
lease with Denney of that parcel of real estate hereinafter described
as the dominant parcel: and they anticipate establishing and
operati~g a Crivc-in Dair1· Queen-type food servict'. ThC?sc parties
by tr.is instrument make and establish an easement over, upon and
across real property owned by Bell-Dittenberger and her~inafter
described as the servient· parcel for drainfie1d purposes as more
fully described as paragraph 3 below.
The dominant parcel is described as follows:
A,
The West 140 feet of the North 150 feet of the North half of
the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of the North-
west guarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,
W.M., in King County, Washington;
ALSO, the East 10 feet of the West 150 feet of the North half
of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of the North-
west quarter, EXCEPT the South 90 feet, EXCEPT portions thereof
lying within 138th Avenue S.E. and S.E. 128th Street.
B,
The West 140 feet of the North half of the Northeast quarter
of the Northeast ~·~2.rter of the Northwest quarter of Section
15 1 Township ;:..J, North, Range 5 East, W.M., jn King County,
Washington, EXCEPT the North 150 feet, EXCEPT the South 90
feet, EXCEPT portions thereof lying within S.E. 128th Street.
The servient parcel is described as follows:
The Southerly 10 feet; and the West 60 feet of the South 50
feet of the remainder of Tax Lot 124, in the Northwest quarter
of Section 15, Township 23 North I Range 5 East, W .M. ·, King
County, Washington, mc.."."e fully described as follows: (See
attached Diagram "Exhibit A") .
Bell-Dittenberger hereby grant and conveys to Denney this
drainfield easement over, upon and across the servient parcel
~~ ..
,r
";>;
subject to terms ~-nd cor:.ditions as reciteJ bP.low; and Renton East
h-.:?reby c0:;,:e-J"1t:111l!:i and agrees to perform all of t:lle leassee obligations
and to hold Denney harmless thereon~
L TERM: '!'he term .of this lease shall be indefinite and,
if not otherwise previously terminated sha~l cease and terminate
on the 90th day aftei:-public sewer, suffioient to se.rvice the food
s:c:rvice operations c..: RP-nton East is available for hook· on by the
dominant parcel.
2. RENT:. $100.00 per month payable on the first day of r:-ach
and every month commencing with the month of S.~·4A , 1982.
3. USE, MAINTENANCE AL~D POSSESSION: Lessee shall ~ave
complete possession and oc_cupation as is reasonably necessary to
engineer, excavate for and install the sewer line and drainfield
which work shall be accomplished within a reasonable span of time
and, thereafter, the servier.t parcel shall be rnaintai·ned so as to
not Pe unsightly. The sewer and sanitary system establis?ed will
be sufficient for and used in the n·rmal public food service operations
of Renton East with an approximate effluent dischar~~ of two to
three hundred gallons per day. At Bell-Oittenbergers' request and
to ac~omodate Bell-Dittenbergers' futur.e developmeP~ of its entire
real property, the shape and location of the drainfield shall he
subject to future change, and Bell~Dittenberger may relocate the
drainfield ~ithin the confines of its property as described above
~onditioned upon lessee paying full cosL therefcr and further
conditioned upo• the drainfield, as relocated, functioning as good
or better than previously and further that it meets all requirements
: f all governmental authority J-cJVing J u:risdiction therein.
Denney and Renton East may, after initial installation, enter
upon the drainfield area as the same is the, located and from time
tf" time effect reasonable maintenance as to the sanitary system; and,
at the termination of this lease disconnect the sewer system and
restore the property to former condition, such restoration being an
oblig3tion of lessee ~~reunder.
-2 -
--........................... -
,, .
. { ..
4. FASEMENT IS APPURTt.NANT: denefits and burden of the
easement established herein run with the land as to the benefit
and the burden thereof.
s. ~Or.MAN & GRIFFITH CAN ASSIGN: If Holman & Griffith
incorporate Renton East D~iry Queen, Inc., they ~ay assign and
delegate their ben~flts and obligations hereunder to that. ·corpora-
tion retaining· a guara:itOr position as to thei.c individui:l:l ob·liga-~
ti0ns thereon.
6. DEFAULT: Upon failure of the payment of rent Bell-
Dittenberger can terminate this lease and disconnect t~e sanitary
system. Damages sustained by Bell-Dittenberger in any w~ongful
termination ~nuld include the cost of removal of the drainfield
system and restoration Of the premises.
7. GOVERNMENT APPROVAL: ~his agreement and all benefits
arid ~bligations of all parties thereunder are conditioned upon
the approval of King county as to the design and instal~ation of
the drainfield anticipated hereunder.
8. ATTORNEYS FEES: If any party is in default under the
terms of this agreement that party shall pay, in addition to all
other damages assessed reasonable attorney fees.
9. HOLD HARMLESf.: Renton East hereby covenants and agrees
to hold harmless Bell-Dittenberger and their assigns or successors
from all liability with respect to this drainfield easement.
DATED this ZS-day o:!:
BELL-DITTENBERGER, a Washington Partner-
ship
. ',-...,..,__ .. . ----? -c . t-l1..,..?(::::yj~.,.
· ttenberger ,J
By·
/
-3 •
f··
STATE OF WASHTN~TON
COUNTY OF KING
ss.
On. ·thi,g day personally appeared Richard .Joseph Dittenberger
and Gerald Richard Bell to me known to be the pa~tncrs of
Bell-Dittenberger, a Washington ~artnership that executed the
foregoing instrument and ·acknowledged the said inst:umerit to be
the free and voluntary act and deed of the partnership for ·the
usas and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that ·
they are authorized to execute the instrument on behalf of the
part=i"ership.
G:VEN under my hand , 1982. .., -and seal this v"'(;ii day of
·~ 1/,· . ·-. ll ~ ·~4.U (( ~ iy Pub~ic in and for the State of
Washington, residing at /i.--1;..Cj'.,_..
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY '" .. ~ :KING
ss.
On this day personally appeared before me Doris E~ Denney
to me known to be the individual described in and who executed
the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that
she signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed for the
purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN under m;.• hand and seal this
l"l_
~day
Washington, residing at
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF RING
ss.
, 1982.
On this day personally appeared before me Thomas E. Holman and
Larry Griffith to me known to be the individual described in and
who executed the within and foregoing instrnment and aclmowledged
to me that t~ey signed the same as their fre~ and voluntary ...;:;t
and deed for the purposes therein mentioned~
GIVEN under my hand and seal this ?-:1 day o~ ~ , 1982.
-4 -
_____ .... ~---.. ~ ....... __ _
=.: !1., .. f·
• . ~
'
R" , .,s
.
'
-
@
'·-?.L_-. ----I
.JD"/
l1J
. <I)
.-, ...
NW 15-23~5*.
SCALE l"-= iOO'
.
.. l;~!s~
! '
··'@ ;
,oo_j
d
xN.7.Jas, .....
·y-;1~-;."""j7-:-;:;;,
,·
' ;
fl-{, ~~
(I ,,Pc 0. \~ ...,,...,..<, L~ • ' fs'-1' .. ·@... & -~ ,., @
"-.,_ Po -L---.~-._1,~0~?:c_.::o;:<':;Z~J___!I~ _ --'-~-3_o__ !
,;_ l.27.0~'1.... ---.-,
..
~ .. ...
" .,
'·," . -· \ J " . ,'\· .. ~-r,,-,H-.\L, ~ ' I\ f~C,1 •. "'·
}--------~--.:'.:·2. 7, ~ s 3
.; /1<--
'l · 7
@
"
f
Suk I
Wol
N' 11 I
---.., +-rea:n·:c:.;--tm_ Chaff
I :tr:>5d.. nue
»~ 2 i;r~11
. ' "··". W .ndf;D ~ .M"'~
k·
""' 1108 110
TIM!-cr1.nt«-S-_herei1t_ CHOON S. PARK 1. lD JEAN C. PARK,_ Husband
an<l Wife, -----------------------·--
tor ti.a c'Jll~:Juat10,. or /I/ C!_/SL. 'ft!£:-------------------------Doll.are
and other valuable cana!deratinn, c"Jn'le) __ nG wm~nt __ to the Ccur.ty of Kint:, Stal..e of Waahinct,on,
•II hltimi•l in the-followin1 deacribed real e&lab!:
The North iso feet of the !rlortheast 1/4 of the Nor•'Jwest 1/4 of the
Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 15, Township 23 North.
Rang@ 5 East. W.M •• sttucite in King County, Washington;
LESS the West 150 feet thereof. and
LESS the County roads, and
LESS coal and mineral rights.
DEED TAKE:
That portion lying Northeasterly of the arc of a c · :cle having a
radius of 25 feet, said cin:le being tangent to a 1 ine 35 feet
South of and parallel to the North HM of saitf sub:Hvision and
tangent to a line 20 feet West of and parallel to the [a::;t line
of said subdivision.
Cont:,!ns an area of US sr;:. ft.
R/W 2108 -S.E. 128TH SiREET ~E,:r· F
~'1-SHSL
..
top(Mt •illl U,e ricbt le Nb all Men....,. sloper · c.ta IIDil fill• .,._ tM abliWllir ....-ti•
•e:k aile fll _,. roMI _.iek W •otr, ar .. ,. k c'lll . .111ded ...... oa NW~. iii, ~..r-ilt, .~~,a.._. e,aeif"Raiical ror Rlpwa.) ..,...., ... to U. .. ......_ _...,..... ..
W 0. rlpa MN'la ~ ~ bea ,c119-.d bJ ~-pneNll.iap -~· £a....& 0-.
...... oltMS... ~·-k1aatca-
30th .., ••'-----'""=ix _____ ... D, ia...!1
--------· ·---
I
STATE OF WASlllNGTON I f .. COllllTY CF mm
On tne ....... 3 .. 0 ....... ,,. day or ... , ........ ":.W.f!:.'I, ............... , 19.f'.1, before tne, a Notary Publtc kl
and ror-the State or Wa.sh.ington, du:y commJs&!oned and sworn, personally ciune .. Cllf.I:Y.. ... L/d/.1:'
...... JLdA! ....... t.;~ ......... f!"'M..(............ . ........................................ to me i'.nown to be the 1n.11¥l4uaL .. .
dacribed. in and... executed the within instrument and acknowl~ttl t.o tile that .............. .sllD&d
.... .flee Md voluntary ad and deed for the ll3tfl ar,d p111 pc:lb
ibtttin mentioned. -····· ----··· ~--.. __ .. ---·-· --~· '"'" ..... __ .. -----... , ___ .. ______ ...... _ __/} . "'"-"'' ·-·· ------... _, -·· ':;/l;~?J./i,'.;!f,.t;;;; ;.~.;;;;;~
B.t.rldl,ii al --~·-··-····--.. ·· .......... .
!COIU'ORATION ACKNO'o7LED(}MJ:HT FORllll
BJ'ATE OF WASHINGTON,
c.om.n or KllfG,
On thiJ. ....... d.ayol
lo me known to be the
I I"'·
aad
. .. before me-pemnaUy a.ppeand
....... and ......
or the corpora.lion thaL uecuted the foregolnt ins~rum.tnL. and ac:cnowla:tged said instrument to be
the rree and voluntary ::1.1:t nnd deed of $.ilid ;;:orporuion, fo,· tht" use, and plll'p0$e.S therein men.
UOntd, and <lJl oalh tltl.ed that .. authortud to execute ,e,ld I.Nit.rumcmt and
t.haL U\e ,SC'aJ &abed i.s the corporate st.ii of said corpon.licn.
Givtn under my h:rnd and offici:i.l ~al 1he dJy and year J~t 2bov~ wriHtn.
Cl I ~ JI i;;.
~ u I " ~ ' ~
)I ~ !s ~ g
I I ..
~
I /1~
H'Xm-11 fvbli&e In 11M Jor IIU siai, aJ lt'"tUhbl¢,m,
Reafillg o.t.
:>! t [.,; ::!! • I ll 1! ~
l (
l .;
~ .. ! ~ 0
.;: ~ E Jj ~ ll
' i i • :; I~ J C ~ 1 'o 0
..
-
i .....
~
;cc
e,
k, ~-;:;:;
<>
"' "'
CJ>
1 I ' L ~ :I !
I
' '
'
~
"' ....
8 .... -~
•
• •
CITY OF Q!lTON, WASHINGTON
ORDIHANCR NO. 4612
a OZDDW!ICK a, 'l'BI C%T1' or SDTCII, wwwu:a,
SSDBLXSBIJIQ AR UU8Sllllll'I' :blsn.IC'.t 1'01. SUT1'JJn" SaD
sa\f'lc:8 lJI A JKQC.TJ:Cl!II <R n& sot:rnt nGBLIIIDS, &D.'DIR
DOIIIU, AIU) ~ Sll'B•BUDl'S dI> titam.XUllfQ 'ID
IIDlB'l' Of TD CDJlGB VPOJf CC!IQtBCTION' TO mB PJ.CZLIUES,
... --
-
THB CIT¥ COtJ!lCit.. Oi" '1'l:lll CI'lY OF' ltBN"l'ON, MASHING'IOH, DO O.RDA.Ill
AS l'OLLOIIS,
'rb~re is hereby created a Sanitasy Sawer
Service Special Asseaaent Diatrl.ft. fo:r the area served. by the Bast
Renton Sa.ni.tM)I' Sewer Interceptor in t.b.e northeast q,.ia-drant of the
City of Renton and a port.ion ot its urban growth area within
uninc:o:rporat;Qd lti11g COUnty, which iiU'eil :ls more particularly
de~cri.bed in Exhibit. ·A· attaciled hereto. A map or the service
.a:-ea is attached as 8:xhibit ... l!I... Tbe recor4ing of this doeumallt 1'I
to provide: .iotification of potential connect.ion am;t interest
chaxges _ Nb.ile thie OOJ:met::tion cha.J."ge may be paid at any time, the
City does not require payae11t until such tJ.ma aa the parcel. is
connected to and tbua benefiting fros the sewer f.aciUties. The
property may be sold. or in any" other way change hands without.
triggering the requirement, by the City, o! payment ct the charges
as110Ciate4 witl:i thi• ditllt~ict,
g;nqr II,
!1ciliti11 in thi• Special Ao111...,.t D11trict oud which proportie1
-------------------..... --;;• .......................... ____ . ___ ._,_.,.. .. _
'
I . •
;---
-___ ....,.,__
•
0
•
ORDINANCE 4 6 12
have not been charged or assessed with all costs of the Bast Renton
Sanitary sewe"t Interceptori as detailed in this ordinance, shall
pay, in addition to the payment of th~ connection pel.l!lit fee ~nd ln
addition to the system development charge, the following additional
fees:
A. Per Unit Charge, New connec~ions of residential dwelling
units or equivalents shall pay a fee of $224.52 per dwelling unit
and all otller uses shall pay a unit charge of $0 .069 per square
f9ot of property. Those properties included within this Special
AssesSOJ.ent Diatrict and which may be assessed a charge thereunder
are included within the boundary legally described. in BJchibit ·A·
and which botlndary is shown on the mc.p attached as Bxhibit "B."
In addition to the aforestated charges. there
shall be a charge of 4.1ll per annum added to the Per rrnit Charge.
Tne interest charge shall acc1'Je for no more than ten (10} years
from the date this ordinance becomes effective. Interest charge:;i
will be simple interest.and not compound interest.
SKCTJ<I! IV, 'l'hi!:1-ordinance shall be effectiv-e upon its
passage, approval, ·and thirty (30} daya afte-r poblication.
PASSED l3l TH£ ClTY COUNCIL this 1.C.th day of_ .. J_.~...,._~_,...._ 199'6.
eterse~, City Clerk
-~:1· ~-.... 1 '...__ _____ ____._~-""""-2 ................ "--"----
i; · 'f::'t:U· +· :er i •:izt3::t -.,
'
I . •
-
1-. ---
1
1 ·-·•r -,.-·-· . . . --•.
•
• •
1
ORDINANCE 4612
APl?ROVBO BY THB MAYOR this ~ day of J"une 1996. I
Appro~as to form: _
oe~~.ic .... a
Lawrence J. Warrenk City Attorney
Date of Pllblication: 6/14/96
ORD.576,5/20/96,as.
Tanner, Mayor
:&'. --------olll~) ~--------·-_. ---·~----:•i~sttti:tPitlt* With . _
'
..
I . . .
•
. -
!·-
-------~ -
"' ' ~
1
Q
" ~ ·,! Q I "' ' l C7)
:I
;:-
" • '!
i
. . .
·-·. ----. T ~ .... .,. ...
•
• •
'
Exhibit A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMEITT DISTRICT
FOR THE CITY OF RENTON-EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR
Portions ofSect!ons 8, 9, IO, 11. 14, 15. 16, 17, 21 and 22 all In Township 23N,
Range 51': W.M. In Klng County, Was1'.inglon
Saction 8, Township 23N, Range 6E W.M.
All of that portJon of Section 8, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. lying East of the
East rlgh.t-of·way line ofSR-405 and Soutb of the followJngdescnbed line:
&g1011lng at the lnterseclkm of the East Urn: of said Sect.loo 8 with the centerline
of NE 7th street; thence Westerly along said centerline of NE 7th Street to Its
Intersection with the centerline of Sunset Boulevanl NE; thence Northerly along
the centerline of Sunset Boulevanl NE to the North line of the Southeast 14 of
said Scctlon B: thence West along said North Urn: to the East right-of-way line of
SR-405 and the tennlnus of said llne.
Section 9, Township 23N, Range 6E W.M.
All of that portlon of Sedlon 9, TOWl'.l5hlp 23N, Range 5E W.M. JylDg South and
East of the followtog descrtbed !toe:
Begtonlng on the cenu,rline of ·NE 7th Street at Its ln-n with the centmlne
of Edmonds Avenue NE; thence Easterly along the cen\erllne of NE 7th Street to
Its lnll:rsection With the oenterllne of Monroe Avenue NE; th= North along saJd
centerline to the South llru, of the Northeast 14 of said Section 9; theru:e East
along said South lloe to II& lnteJ1cciloD with the centerline of Ri:dmond Avenue
· NE: thenre Northerly along saJd oeolerllne to Its loler&ectlon wilh the centerline of
NE 10th street; thence East along said centedio.: to the East line of said Secllon
9 and the !etmlnus of said Boe.
Secllon 10, Township Z!N, Range 5E W.U.
All of that portion of Section 10, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. lying Southedy
aod Westerly of the foilowlDg described line:
Beglrmlng on the West line of Section 10 at Its lntO'SCC!lon with the North lloe of
the South Va of the North~ of said Section 10; thetlcc East along said North lloe
to Its luter.!ectlon with the ccutrtlloe of 142nd Avenue SE; thence Southerly
Blong said =ltallne to Its lntlersoctloo with the Noith lloe of the Southeast " of
said Section 10; thence F.ast along said North Un,, to Its l!Jte,:-,UOO with the East
line of said Sccllon 10 and the temllnus of said lloe .
~~ .... '* -,.,
. :i. ---;.;: . : '
. .: ........ , __________ _...-· • .iis11:·11mi.1·11a1.ii-v1o1i..11iwill· e;1;ttti.·-.. ·-ri.a· ·.:.-~1.:· ,_...
I· •
___ .. :...
l
' 'J
•
it
•
ugal Descripf.1)n of th, Special A=mtnt District
fer the City of Renton -&st Renton lnltraptor
Sectlon 11, Townshlp23N, Range SE W.M .
Pag,2of3
• '1ll of the &uthwesl ~ of Section 1 I, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M ..
Section 14, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M.
All of that portion of Section 14. Township 23N. Range 5E. W.M. described as
follows:
All of the Northwest ~ of said section. together With the Southwest ~ of said
S<Cllon. except the South \; of the Southeast 'A of said Southwest \4 and exa,pt
the plat of Mcintire Homesites and 'h of stteets adjacent as recorded In the Book
of Plats. Volume 58, Page 82, Records of King Com,ty, Washington, and except
the South 151.55 feet of the East 239.435 feet of Tract 6, Block l of Cedar River
Five Acre Tracts as recorck ' In the Book of Plats. Volume 16. Page 52. Reconls of
KIDg County. Wasb!ngton. less\; of the street abutting said portion of Tract 6.
Block 1, and less Tract 6. B. >Ck 2 of said CedarR!ver Five Acre Tracts. less\; of
the street adjacent to said Tract 6. Block 2, and cxrept the South 82. 785 feet of
the East 150feetofTract 5, Block 2 of said Cedar River Five AcreTracts and less
\; the street adjacent to said port!on of Tract 5. Block 2.
Section 15, Township 23N, Range SE W.M.
Ail of that portion of Section 15, Township 23N, Range 5E. W.M .• exa,pt the
Soutbwest \4 of !be Soutbwest \4 of the Southwest \4 of said section.
Section 16, Township 23N, Range SE W.M.
All of that portion of Section 16, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M., exa,pt that
portion of the Southeast \4 of the Southeast \4 of the said Section 16 lylng Eaet of
the East line of the Plat of Maplewood Division No. 2 as recorded tn the Book of
Plats Volume 39, page 39, Rw>rds of King County WasblngtGn and Its Northerly
extension to the North line of oak! Southeast \4 of the Southeast \4 of the sald
Section 16 and except that portlon of said section lying Southerly of the Northerly
right-of-way line ofSR-169 (Maple Valley Highway).
Section 17, Township ZIN, Range 5E W.M.
All of that portion of Sedlon 17, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M.. lying
Northeasterly of the Northeasterly right-<Jf-v,ay of SR-169 [Maple Valley~
and Easterly of the East right-of-way line of SR-405 less that portion lying
gcnen,lly West of the East and Southeastttly llne of Bronson Way NE lylng
F.'t)Af.wl!lfl™i 4 m •rtl'¥f •
:zrrr-Ui:i 4, tit!' :t.Hc·~ •
I. •
-
1-
--.~---, ---..-
•
• •
Ptzll'3Df3
between the South line of the NE 3rd Street lllld the Northeasterly n,a,gtn of SR-
405.
Section 21, Township 23N, Range SE W.M.
All that portion of Section 21, Tcrwnshlp 23N, R SE W .M. lying Northeasterly of
the Northeasterly right-of-way line of SR· 169 (Maple Valley Hlghwayl and West of
the East line of the Plat of Maplewood D!Vlskm No. 2 as n,,x11tled In the Book of
Plats, wlume 89, page 39, R=rds of KbJg Coumy. Waoblngton.
Section 22, Townalllp 23N, fiangt &E W.11.
All of that portion of Section 22, Township 23N, Ra,:,ge SE W.M. described as
follows:
All of the Northw<st 14 of the Northeast \4 of eakl Secllon 22 IYlIII! Northerly of the
Southmy 1i<1c of the Plat of Maplewood Hel&lz!s u recotded in tile Book of Plats,
volume 78, pages.I through 4, ReamlsofK!ngCoUD!y, Wasblngton.
Together with the North 227.11 feet of the Weot 97.02 of the Northeast 14 of the
Northeast 14 of said Section 22. •
•
, . ..,, ..... -· ...
1
'
I . •
•
---·-----------
.. ~-
---~.
I
i
'
•
• •
Ext.ibit 8
EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR
Special Assessment District Boundary
1 . -
•
2000
1:24,000
---a,i.. IZTL7-l s,.cw ,.. __ , Diolrid
'
' s
J
' i
j
;
l
-·
I . •
·AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO:
Eastside Funding, LLC
3933 Lake Washington Blvd NE Suite #100
Kirkland, WA 98033
Grantor(s): SANDJAY, LLC & SYNNEX, LLC
Grantee(s): EASTSIDE FUNDING, LLC
Abbreviated Legal: NE Y. NW Y. NE Y. NW I OF 15123/95
Assessor's tax parcel no(s): I 52305-9124-03
20070122001941.::
111111111111111 II
20070122001941
EASTSIDE DT 39.00 PAGE001 OF 007
01/22/2907 14:53 KING COUNTY, IJA
DEED OF TRUST
THIS DEED OF TRUST, made this 12th day of January, 2007, between SANDJAY, LLC & SYNNEX, LLC,
GRANTOR(S), whose street_address is 4957 Lakemont Blvd SE #C4-28, Bellevue, WA 98006, CASCADE
TRUSTEE SERVICES, INC., TRUSTEE, whose street address is 18300 NE UNION HILL ROAD, #295,
REDMOND, WA 98052, and EASTSIDE FUNDING, LLC, a Washington limited liability company,
BENEFICIARY, whose street_address is 3933 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD NE SUITE #100 KIRKLAND,
WA 98033.
WITNESSETH: Grantor(s) hereby bargain(s), sell(s), and convey(s) to Trustee in trust, with power of sale, the
following described real property in KING County, Washington (the "Property"):
THE NORTH 180 FEET (AS MEASURED ALONG TIJE EAST LINE) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 15,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT THE WEST 150 FEET THEREOF,
AND EXCEPT THE EAST 20 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1804907;
AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 35 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5849734;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF THE ARC OF A CIRCLE HAVING A RADIUS OF 25
FEET, SAID CIRCLE BEING TANGENT TO A LINE 35 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE
OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND TANGENT TO A LINE 20 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF
SAID SUBDIVISION AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR S.E. 128rn STREET BY DEED RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING NO. 8706241488.
Commonly known as: 4615 NORTHEAST 4TH STREET
RENTON, WA 98059
DEED OF TRUST I of7'
20070122001941.0i,.-
which Property is not used principally for agricultural purposes, together with all the tenements, hereditaments,
and appurtenances now or hereafter belonging or in any way appertaining, and together with the following. (all of
which shall be deemed included in the "Property") :
(a) All land lying in streets and roads adjoining the Property, and all access rights and easements pertaining to
the Property.
(b) All the lands, tenements, privileges, reversions, remainders, irrigation and water rights and stock, oil and gas
rights, royalties, minerals and mineral rights, hereditaments and appurtenances belonging or in any way
pertaining to the Property.
( c) All buildings, structures, improvements, fixtures and property now or hereafter attached to or used in the
operation of the Property
(d) All rents, issues and profits of the Property, all existing and future leases of the Property (including
extensions, renewals and subleases), all agreements for use and occupancy of the Property ( all such leases and
agreements whether written or oral, are hereafter referred to as the "Leases"), and all guaranties of lessees'
performance under the Leases, together with the immediate and continuing right to collect and receive all of the
rents 1 income~ receipts, revenues, issues, profits and other income of any nature now or hereafter due (includjng
any income of any nature coming due during any redemption period) under the Leases or from or arising out of
the Property including minimum rents, additional rents, percentage rents, parking or common area maintenance
contributions, tax and insurance contributions, deficiency rents, liquidated damages foJlowing default in any
Lease, all proceeds payable under any policy of insurance covering loss of rents resulting from untenantability
caused by destruction or damage to the Property, all proceeds payable as a result of a lessee's exercise of an
option to purchase the Property, all proceeds derived from the termination or rejection of any Lease in a
bankruptcy or other insolvency proceeding, and all proceeds from any right and claims of any kind which
Grantor may have against any lessee under the Leases or any occupants of the Property (all of the above are
hereafter collectively referred to as the "Rents"). This subsection is subject to the right, power and authority
given to the Beneficiary in the Loan Documents (as defined herein) to collect and apply the Rents.
( e) All compensation, awards, damages, rights of action and proceeds (including insurance proceeds and any
interest on any of the foregoing) arising out of or relating to a taking or damaging of the Property by reason of
any public or private improvement, condemnation proceeding (including change of grade), fire, earthquake or
other casualty, injury or decrease in the value of the Property; all returned premiums or other payments on any
insurance policies pertaining to the Property and any refunds or rebates of taxes or assessments on the Property.
(f) All permits, permit applications, plans, specifications, contracts, agreements and purchase orders pertaining
or incidental to the design, construction, maintenance or management of any improvements on the Property,
Grantor's rights under any payment, performance~ or other bond in connection with construction of
improvements on the Property, and all construction materials, supplies, and equipment delivered to the Property
or intended to be used in connection with the construction of improvements on the Property wherever actually
located.
THIS DEED IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF SECURING the following:
(a} Payment of the sum of FIVE HUNDRED SIXTY FOUR THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED FORTY
AND 021100 DOLLARS ($564,840.02), with interest thereon, according to the terms of a promissory note of
even date herewith, payable to Beneficiary or order and made by Grantor (the "Note," which term shall include
all renewals, modifications or extensions thereof evidencing the indebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust)
DEED OF TRUST 2 of?
20070122001941. ,:,i,
(b) Payment of any further sums advanced or loaned by Beneficiary to Granter, or any of its successors or
assigns, if (1) the Note or other writing evidencing the future advance or loan specifically states that it is
secured by this Deed of Trust or (2) the advance, including costs and expenses incurred by Beneficiary, is
made pursuant to this Deed of Trust or any other documents executed by Grantor evidencing, securing or
relating to the Note and/or the Collateral, whether executed prior to, contemporaneously with or subsequent to
this Deed of Trust (this Deed of Trust, the Note and such other documents, including any construction or other
loan agreement, are hereafter collectively referred to as the "Loan Documents") together with interest thereon
at the rate set forth in the Note unless otherwise specified in the Loan Documents or agreed to in writing; and
( c) Performance of each agreement, term and condition set forth or incorporated by reference in the Loan
Documents unless performance of such agreement, term or condition is specifically provided to not be secured by
this Deed. of Trust.
Notwithstanding the foregoing and the covenants hereafter set forth, it is expressly agreed and acknowledged that
none of the covenants, representations, or other obligations ofGrantor set forth in this Deed of Trust are intended
by Grantor and Beneficiary to secure or be the substantial equivalent of obligations of Grantor arising under any
the Hazardous Substance Indemnity or other environmental indemnity agreement or provision, including without
limitation any agreement or provision pertaining to hazardous or toxic wastes or substances, and any reference
hereafter to the Loan Documents shall not include any such environmental indemnity agreement or provision
included therein.
COVENANTS: Grantor(s) covenant(s) and agree(s) as follows:
l. To keep the Property in good condition and repair; to permit no waste of the Property; to complete any
building, structure, or improvement being built or about to be built on the Property; to restore promptly any
building, structure, or improvement on the Property which may be damaged or destroyed; and to comply with all
laws, ordinances, regulations, covenants, conditions, and restrictions affecting the Property.
2. To pay before delinquent all lawful taxes and assessments upon the Property; to keep the Property free and
clear of all other charges, liens, or encumbrances impairing the security of this Deed of Trust;
3. To keep all buildings now or hereafter erected on the Property continuously insured against loss by fire or
other hazards in an amount not Jess than the total debt secured by this Deed of Trust. All policies shall be held
by the Beneficiary, and be in such companies as the Beneficiary may approve and have loss payable first to the
Beneficiary, as its interest may appear, and then to the Grantor(s). The amount collected under any insW'ance
policy may be applied upon any indebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust in such order as the Beneficiary shall
determine. Such application by the Beneficiary shall not cause discontinuance of any proceedings to foreclose
this Deed of Trust. In the event of foreclosure, all rights of the Grantor(s) in insurance policies then in force shall
pass to the purchaser at the foreclosure sale.
4. To defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect the security hereof or the rights or powers of
Beneficiary or Trustee, and to pay all costs and expenses, including cost of title search and attorney's fees in a
reasonable amount, in any such action or proceeding, and in any suit brought by Beneficiary to foreclose this
Deed of Trust.
5. To pay all costs, fees, and expenses in connection with this Deed of Trust, including the expenses of the
Trustee incurred in enforcing the obligation secured by this Deed of Trust and Trustee's and attorney's fees
actually incurred, as provided by statute.
DEED OF TRUST 3 of7
20070122001941.::.
6. That, in the event Grantor(s) fails to pay when due any taxes, assessments, insurance premiums, Hens,
encumbrances, or other charges against the Property, Beneficiary may pay the same, and the amount so paid, with
interest at the rate set forth in the note secured by this Deed of Trust, shall be added to and become a part of the
debt secured in this Deed of Trust.
7. The Property may not be sold (by conveyance, contract to sell or otherwise), assigned, transferred or
encumbered without the Beneficiary's consent; upon breach of this provision, in addition to any other remedies
provided in the Note or Loan Documents, Beneficiary may declare all sums due under the Note and this Deed of
Trust immediately due and payable, unless prohibited by applicable law.
8. In the event any portion of the Property is taken or damaged in an eminent domain proceeding, the entire
amount of the award or such portion as may be necessary to fully satisfy the obligation secured by this Deed of
Trust shall be paid to Beneficiary to be applied to said obligation.
9. By accepting payment of any sum secured by this Deed of Trust after its due date, Beneficiary does not waive
its right to require prompt payment when due of all other sums so secured or to declare default for failure to so
pay.
10. The Trustee shall reconvey all or any part of the Property covered by this Deed of Trust to the person
entitled thereto, on written request of the Grantor(s) and the Beneficiary, or upon satisfaction of the obligation
secured and written request for reconveyance made by the Beneficiary or the person entitled thereto.
11. Upon default by Grantor(s) in the payment of any indebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust or in the
performance of any agreement contained in this Deed of Trust, all sums secured by this Deed of Trust shall
immediately become due and payable at the option of the Beneficiary. In such event and upon written request of
Beneficiary, Trustee shall sell the trust property, in accordance with the Deed of Trust Act of the State of
Washington.
12. Trustee shall deliver to the purchaser at the sale its deed, without warranty, which shall convey to the
purchaser all right, title and interest in the real and personal property which Grantor(s) had or had the power to
convey at the time of the execution of this Deed of Trust, and such as Grantor(s) may have acquired thereafter.
Trustee's deed shall recite the facts showing that the sale was conducted in compliance with all the requirements
oflaw and of this Deed of Trust, which recital shall be prima facie evidence of such compliance and conclusive
evidence thereof in favor of bona fide purchaser and encumbrancers for value.
13. The power of sale conferred by this Deed of Trust and by the Deed of Trust Act of the State of Washington
is not an exclusive remedy; Beneficiary may cause this Deed of Trust to be foreclosed as a mortgage.
14. Jn the event of the absence, death, incapacity, disability, or resignation of Trustee, or at the discretion of the
Beneficiary, Beneficiary may appoint in writing a successor trustee, and upon the recording of such appointment
in the mortgage records of the county in which this Deed of Trust is recorded, the successor trustee shall be
vested with all powers of the original trustee. The trustee is not obligated to notify any party hereto of pending
sale under any other Deed of Trust or of an action or proceeding in which Grantor(s), Trustee, or Beneficiary
shall be a party,
15. This Deed of Trust applies to, inures to the benefit of, and is binding not only on the parties hereto, but on
his/her/their heirs, devisees, legatees, administrators, executors, and assigns. The term Beneficiary shall mean
the holder and owner of the note secured hereby, whether ornot named as Beneficiary herein.
DEED OF TRUST 4of7
20070122001941 ::::_:·
16. This Deed of Trust shall be deemed a security agreement, as defined in the Uniform Commercial Code as
adopted and amended by the State of Washington. The remedies for any violation of the covenants, terms and
conditions of the agreements contained herein shall be as prescribed (i) herein, or (ii) by general law, or (iii) by
the specific statutory consequences now or hereafter enacted, and specified in the Uniform Commercial Code as
enacted by the State of Washington, all at Beneficiary's sole election. Grantor and Beneficiary agree that the
filing of any financing statement in the records normally having to do with personal property shall not be
construed as impairing the hereby stated intention of the parties that everything used in connection with the
construction, management, maintenance and production of income from the Property together with all other
rights and property described herein and comprising the secured property shall at all times and for all purposes in
all proceedings, both legal and equitable, be regarded as part of the Property, whether physically attached or
specifically identified or not.
17. As further security for the payment of all indebtedness and performance of all obligations secured hereby,
Grantor irrevocably and absolutely assigns to Beneficiary, the rents, issues, profits and proceeds of contracts of
the Property, together with all future leases, profits and contracts, and any and all extensions, renewals and
replacements hereof. However, as long as no default shall exist in any obligation secured hereby, Grantor may
collect assigned rents and profits as the same shall fall due. All rents or profits receivable from or in respect to
the Property which Grantor shall be pem1itted to collect hereunder shall be received by it in trust to pay the usual
and reasonable operating expenses of, and the taxes upon, the Property and the payment of all sums secured
hereby. Upon the occurrence of any default in payment of any indebtedness or performance of any obligation
secured hereby, all rights of the Granter to collect and receive rents and profits shall wholly and immediately
terminate without notice, and Beneficiary shall thereafter have the absolute right to all such rents and profits. In
addition to, and not in limitation of the foregoing, Beneficiary shall have the right to petition the Court of
appropriate jurisdiction for the appointment ofa Receiver of the rents, issues and profits of the Property and shall
have in addition to the rights and powers customarily given to and exercised by such receiver, the right to enter
upon and take possession of the Property and manage the same with all rights and options in regard thereto
available to Grantor. Grantor expressly waives the posting of bond by such receiver, and waives any cha11enge to
a proposed receiver based on affiliation with Beneficiary ..
SANDJAY,~ ! L
SIGNED'.~ ---J'-t-~,_/ ___ l. ___ ~L
BY: (--/v"7f;;. )1 (,<,JW f
ITS: /),,, e.M bl.r
SYNNEX,LLC
SIGNED~
BY: Br-to."-Jesse.,
ITS: me,wiber
DEED OF TRUST 5 of7
20070122001941
STATE OF (A17v')b\+,
COUNTYOF~k5"--l->~fY,¥~+--------,----
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that __:J;j:\~\\':!s2}:{l..\!~fu-t~j;:_ ________________ _
(is/are} the person(s) who appeared before me, and said person s) acknowledged that (he/~he/they) si~cd this instrument, on oath stated
that (he/she/they) (is/are} authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the ~Joe.X: of
~~ U(' / to be the free and voluntary act of such party(ies) for the uses
anin(l"pO~t·Ofl din this instrument.
Notary Public in and ti
Residing at .h,Ulf::.tl::Jbl>er~~-~--=::_-----
My appointment expi,es: _h__-!3. _ _,__-~/ D~-------
STATE OF W~lt~7JY\~ l
COUNTY OF K '":J \-ss
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ~Tu~~\~Q.(l=~--:-~\f=~~~~-~----------------
(islare) the person(s) who appeared before me, and said person(s) acknowledged that (he/she/they) signed this instrument, on oath stated
that (he/she/they) (is/are) autho{J!;o execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the _J}1 tl'b. W of ~ V)\1.1J:,l. l-to be the free and voluntary act of such party(ies) for the uses
and ~es mentioned in this instrument.
1?., 3tl)7
DEED OF TRUST 6 of7
20070122001941 ·:··_·
REQUEST FOR FULL RECONVEY ANCE
Do not record. To be used only when note has been paid.
TO: TRUSTEE
The undersigned is the legal owner and holder of the note and all other indebtedness secured by the within Deed
of Trust. Said note, together with all other indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust, has been fully paid and
satisfied; and you are hereby requested and directed, on payment to you of any sums owing to you under the
tenns of said Deed of Trust, to cancel said note above mentioned, and all other evidences of indebtedness
secured by said Deed of Trust delivered to you herewith, together with the said Deed of Trust, and to reconvey,
without warranty, to the parties designated by the terms of said Deed of Trust, all the estate now held by you
thereunder.
Dated: ___________ _
DEED OF TRUST 7 of7
•
..
WHEN RECORDED. RETURN TO:
Eastside Funding, LLC
3933 Lk Wash Blvd NE ~ I 00
Kirkland, WA 98033
20091231000304.001
111111111111~111
20091231000304
EASTSICE FUND! 0 64 ee PAOE-881 OF 8'>J •
12/JI/2009 10:12 KING COUNTY, UA
E2424003
12131/:leH 19: 12
KIMO COUNTY, WA
TAX $10.00
SALE $0 .00 PAGE-HI OF 001
Documcni Title: DEED IN LIEU OF FORECLOSURE
Grantor: Sandjay, LLC & Synnex, LLC
Grantee: Eastside Funding, LLC
Abbreviated Legal: NE Y., NW Y., NEY., NW I of I S/23/95
DEED IN LIEU OF FORECLOSURE
THE GRANTOR, Sandjay, LLC & Synnex, LLC, for and in lieu of foreclosure of the Deed ofTrusl
recorded under Auditors File No.20070122001941 conveys and quit claims to Eastside Funding, LLC, lhe
following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington, together with all the
tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances, now or hereafter belonging or in any way appertaining, and the
rents. issues and profits thereof and the proceeds of any contracts of sale, including any interest therein which
grantor may hereafter acquire:
THE NOR7H 180 FEET (AS MtASURED ALONG THE EAST LINE) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWES'r QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 15,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., lN KING COUNTY, WASHiNGtON;
E:XCEPT THE WEST 150 fEET THEREOF,
ANO E>:CEPT THE EAST 20 FEET THEREOF CONVEi"EO TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED
RtCORQF.D UNOER RECORDING NO. 1804907;
AND E>:CEPT THE NORTH 3S FEET THEREOE" CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEE:.O
RECO~DED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5S49734;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF THE ARC OF A CIRCLE HAVING A RADIUS OF 2S
rEET 1 SAlD CI~CLE BEING TANGENT TO A LINE 35 FEET SOOTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH L!N£
OF SAID SUSDIV!SION AND TANGENT TO A LINE 20 FEET WEST OF ANO PARALLEL TO '!'HE EAST L!NE or
SAID SUBDIVISION AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FORS.~. 128 7 H STREET BY DEED RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING NO, S?06241~68.
Title conveyed hereby is not intended to merge with any other interest of any kind or nature which Grantee
may now possess or hereafter acquire. including without limitation Grantee's beneficial interest in that certain
Deed ofTrust dated Januaoy 12, 2007, recorded in King County under Auditor's File No 20070122001941.
The undersigned, under penalty of perjury, affirms that:
I. Th is conveyance is an absolute conveyance of the title to the property identified herein in effect as
well as fonn, and is not intended as a mortgage, trust conveyance. or security of any kind. and that
possession of the property has been surrender,d to the Grantee hereunder;
2. This conveyance is the free and voluntary act of the of the Grantor herein and tbat Grantor is not
acting under any misapprehension as to the effect hereof, nor under any duress, undue influence, or
misrepresentation by the Grantee or any agent or attorney of the Grantee;
Descrip~ion: Kitlg,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.PocID 2009.1231.304 Paga: l 0£ 3
Order: P.PPP Comment:
20091231000304-':,.;;
'
3. It is the intention oflhe Grantor to convey, and by this Deed Granter does hereby convey, to the
Grantee all of its right, title and interest absolutely in and to the property herein described.
4. This affirmation is made for the protection and benefit of the Grantee, its successors and assigns,
and all other parties hereinafter dealing with or who may acquire or insure an interest in the property
herein described and shall .bind the undersigned and its successors in interest.
5. Granlor hereby forever releases and discharges Grantee, its officer.;, directors, and employees of
and from any and all claims, causes of action. or liabilities of any kind or nature, now known or
hereafter discovered, from whatever cause arising (collectively "Claims"), all of which Claims are
expressly hereby waived. This waiver and release of Claims is unconditional, immediate, and binding
upon each and all Grantors, and their successors in interest, for all purposes in all proceedings
hereafter, including without limitation, any proceedings under the United States Bankruptcy Code.
This waiver and release of Claims is a material and expressly bargained-for consideration of1his
agreement, severable, and independently enforceable notwithstanding a finding 1hat any other
provision hereof is unenforceable.
Grantor: S A1V.'3f'l'f1 L(.. ~ Grantor: r y,.,.vE )1.1 t..L.<.. t:::i
~ .--?>~
Si,mature
_f1!::,h Sfc r,v,...-f,, /)/l{,1nl,.e,..
Print
B/'ic.,., 7ess,,,, , 1J.umJ..t.,.... ,
STATf. <>e (j )~b;°:1-ktv
l-•11
)
Print
C:OIJNTY 0~ ~----------
1 ,·ert 1fy tho~ ~I··,..:~ or have satisfactory ev1dence that
KARLA J. HURST
NOTARY PUBLIC
. STATE OP WASHINGTON
COMMISSJQN EXPIRES
JUNE 9, 2010
(is/art:/ the person(s) who appeared before me, and said person( (he/she/they)
siyncd this instrument, on oath stated that lhe/she/theyl (is/ate) authorized to e)(ecur.e the
ir,:Hrmne:it and acknowledged it as the ot _.._tf\~o:P:.)({\=...uku...,:...t:'e,_ _______________ _
to be ·:he [ree and voluntary act o! such party{iesJ for the uses c1nd putp0$es mentioned in 1:hls
ir.stn.imc-nt.
19--\no )01
Residing at
Description: King,W4 Document -Year.Montb.Day.DocID 2009.1231.304 Page: 2 of 3
Order: pppp Comment:
20091231000304_GG,
) -ss
l
' (is/iHti\ the person{sl who appeai:~d before me, and .said pe~.sonlsf acknowledged that (he/she/they]
:signed this instrument, on O<'lth :5t.!lted that (h,e/shl:'/they) Cis/arel .a.uthodzed to execute the
instrument <:1nd acknowledged it:. as the of -+(i\1-"P"'--'rl\'-'--'"X)o._..,~..,•'---------------------
to be ~he free and voluntary act of 5uch party(i~sl foe the uses ~nd pu~poses mentioned in this
inst rur11ent.
[Mted:
KARLA J. HURST
NOTARY PUBLIC
STI\TE OF WI\SHlNGTON
C~ISSION EXPIRES
JUNE 9. 2010
Residing at
My appointment expires:
DeBcription: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 2009.1231.304 Page: 3 of 3
Order: pppp Comment:
NW 15-23-05
\
......... _
I
,e j T
'f ....
lol""'"""" D~pl ~I AHllrlMl!nl* ---=:::"""' ----=-=--
NW 15-23-05
""!111.ffllO
• i
,. ....
..
.. -
20091231000304.001
"
11111111~1111111
20091231000304
EASTS!OE FUNO! 0 64 oe
PAGE-9111 OF 9113 .
WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO:
Eastside Funding. LLC
3933 Lk Wash Blvd NE# I 00
Kirkland, WA 98033
lZ/31/2089 J8:ll KING C:OUNTV, UR
E2424003
12131/2"9 19: 12
KIMG COUNTY, t.HI
TQK $10.00
SALE $0.00
Document Title: DEED IN LIEU OF FORECLOSURE
Grantor: Sandjay, LLC & Synnex, LLC
Grantee: Eastside Funding, LLC
Abbreviated Legal: NE V., NW Y-, NEV., NW I of I 5/23/95
DEED IN LIEU OF FORECLOSURE
PACE--801 OF 001
THE GRANTOR. Sandjay. LLC & Synnex, LLC, for and in lieu of foreclosure of the Deed ofTrust
recorded under Auditors File No.2007012200194 I conveys and quit claims to Eastside Funding, LLC. the
following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington, together with all !he
tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances, now or hereafter belonging or in any way appertaining, and the
rents. issues and profits thereof and the proceeds of any contracts of sale, including any interest therein which
grantor may hereafter acquire:
THE NORTH 180 E'EET (AS MEASURED ALONG THE EAST LINE:) Of' THE NORTHE.AST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NQRTEWEST QUARTER Of SECTION 15,
TOWNSHIP 2) NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., lN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT THE WEST 150 fEET THEREO~,
AND E.KCEPT THE EAST 20 FEET THtREOF CONVEYE.0 TO KING COUNTY fCJR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED
R~CORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1004907;
AND LXC£:PT THE NORTH 35 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY fOF-ROAD PURPOSES 6Y OC:EO
RECORPE.0 UNDER RECORDING NO. 5849734:
AND E:}:CEPT THAT PORTION LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF THE AP.C OF A CIRCLE HAVING A RADIUS OF 25
r~ET, SAID CIRCLE BEING TANGENT TO A LINE 35 FE~T SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE
OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND TANGENT TO A LINE 20 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL TO '!'HE EAST LrnE OF
SAlD SUBDIVISION AS CONVLYED TO KING COUNTY roR S.E. 128:~ STR£tT BY DEED RECORDED UNOER
RECORDING NO. 9706241468.
Title conveyed hereby is not intended to merge with any other interest of any kind or nature which Grantee
may now possess or hereafter acquirei including without limitation Grantee's beneficial interest in that certain
Deed ofTrust dated January 12, 2007, recorded in King County under Auditors File No 2007012200194 I.
The undersigned, under penalty of perjury, affirms that:
I. This conveyance is an absolute conveyance of the title to the property identified herein jn effect as
well as form~ and is not intended as a mortgage. trust conveyance. or security of any kind, and lhal
possession of the property has been surrender~d to the Grantee hereunder;
2. This conveyance is the free and voluntary act of the of the Grantor herein and that Grantor is not
acting under any misapprehension as 10 the effect hereof, nor under any duress, undue influence. or
misrepresentation by the Grantee or any agent or attorney of the Grantee;
Description: King,WA Document~ Year.Moneh.Day.DocID 2009.1231.30~ Page: l of 3
Order: pppp Comme.o t:
20091231000304_.:,;;;
..
J. It is the intention of the Grantor to convey, and by this Deed Grantor does hereby convey, to the
Granree all of its right, title and interest absolutely in and to the property herein described.
4. This affinnation is made for the protection and benefit of the Grantee, its successors and assigns,
and all other parties hereinafter dealing with or who may acquire or insure an interest in the property
herein described and shall bind the undersigned and its successors in interest.
5. Granto, hereby forever releases and discharges Grantee, its officers, directors, and employees of
and from any and all claims, causes of action, or liabilities of any kind or nature, now known or
hereafter discovered, from whatever cause arising (collectively "Claims"), all of which Claims are
expressly hereby waived. This waiver and release of Claims is unconditional, immediate, and binding
upon each and all Grantors, and their successors in interest, for all purposes in all proceedings
hereafter. including without limitation, any proceedings under the United States Bankruptcy Code.
This waiver 811d release of Claims is a material and expressly bargained-for consideration of this
agreement, severable, and independently enforceable notwithstanding a finding that any other
provision hereof is unenforceable.
Grantor: Grantor: r Ytv·vE Y., L'-'--':::l
~ •.
---?-~
STATE or lj J/l.s\')·.~
J-aa
COUNTY ot· J
SiPnature
KARLA J. HURST
NOTARY PUBLIC
, STATE OF WASHINGTON
co ..... ,ss,ON EXPIRES
JUNE 9. 2010
~ertify that I k or have satisfactory evldence that
lis/cH(!l the person(s) who appeared beto.ce me, and said.person{
siyncd th~.s instrument, on oath stated that (he/she/they] (is/ale) authorized to execute the
ir,st.rnme;it .md a-cknQwledged it as the o[ _.Ll'!\.,_,,.P;..>('(\<U...uTh_.,c..C"'-----------------
to be ·;h~ hee and voluntary ac:: of such party(iesl for the uses .an.:i purposes ment.ioned in t.hls
ir.strurnont.
Residitii;J at
Descripeion: King,WA DocumeDt -Year.Month.Day.DocID 2009.1231.304 Page: 2 of 3
Order: pppp Comment:
STATC '" IA h'::,~ \":':)b
COUNTY OF V \~ } -11:,
)
I cert~,y that I kno~ or have satisractory evidence that
20091231000304. ,:-,,:,,
' (is/aret the person{s) Wh.O appeared before me, and 5aid pei::-,on(s} admcwledged that (he/she/they)
signed this instrumeflt, on oath ::St<llt.ed that (he/she/they) (i:;/areJ a.uthorized to execute the
instru111ent dnd acknow~edged it as the of ..cf"{'\u,€wrl\ro.ibou1..~.:JCl.....-------------------
co be :he free and voluntary act of s~eh party(ies) for the uses and purposes mentioned in this
instrument.
Dated:
KARLA J. HURST
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COt.f,USSION EXPIRES
JUNE 9. 2010
R~siding at
My appointment expires:
Description; King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 2009.1231.304 Page: 3 of 3
Order: pppp Comment:
... ,.~-:\, ..
i~r
1~;1-.:::~.:;
i~;-ii'" \.i ;:~,;fJi:/i~:.t'lf/';1!:";1{,f _:;,P·tc· ,l"l ·;,e
1 (1RSl.';C
'
tt.~o:,e · :·.:!i o:..:.._·c,lL~:l.)
i :·· ': r·,~t ':.If ?tl",'.l
I "' ~
••
to
l Co1: :;;• oJ i(J ilC"i ~t;,t,.
i
i j al, lo-.· ~.:-.f' aoi,'!.i:lc:rll.~lo:i o~·
........
.:'.;;., 1:,2;·, c.t ;,"' ·:tn p~ct 10 ..U!.,
D. X. ~e1·ei,ii:,-:,:0 C'cw.t:• ,,\1,!i'.:or,
,.-:.lit C
fluy n,: out a!lrl estabi.tn:· 1:.11; <'. p:~blie 1·0.,!d .;):l'O'i.;·i: '.'.·ni:• ;-i::-:.;:-.,;;:•t;y,; ,-·,·i1ici1 i:;; ~: in;:,ftcr fa'!lC?"froci,
·.ci.or·.,;;,.-, l'l!'..,eaa• ~ q;;it-01.:i.i..i. to ti.c GO\l.1'.;;: o:.· f.! :·;;:, ;;'~a~c o:f ~;; -1:l.~,::~0.'?1 ~-~!" ..:.· ~ 0~ ;;;:o p~ -.il1e iC!"Cl.t1J"
1
i
.,·
· n;j:·:'~f .. "th• If.. 01 !he r.-.:.:! or tl.e Ni'ii ~L:.·
0~~1~ 1.1,. ~ores. ,10\'t!I o:r las::,
l;."h!'" 'HE~; o: -:,:,e Il"'t,l,},, ~;'.c(,i)t t
r.1:eo:;t t;:~ ::. 30 £~. t:.:, :· of;
Hi,~::t-:,f-. .-,;',,., ..•• ·::-.::, .,.·.
-.l:.
........
7.:,.... . , ( :.
:/, R, '.=
.{0 .::: .. e: ,:.:::~, '.;o ,n J,C,Col.v"i. .,
._j)oJ l\"" .,
'· ;~ :~'I: ~)J~ d-; o; :."l',;.,'l;~·.-.,.
Dj·f, o.~ .::,
"in>~n4, th07 ~:·,~i:-uted t<1c i,:i't:::.il:l. inc::t~~,-.::11,::-:t f:l.'1:: _o ·lc,~:, ,~ ';o ,_
'.:.{jh~J.':i:r•• .r..td volunta:ry net im-.. ,,C!L'li ::,~· :.:, · ;.:;_~,:;
iitt. b.s.nd. l'lcl o:·i".t:cfal s,c.1 :;:,·, d:;· i,::. :-·c~~-;,,
iJ<al )
~J92"5 ~ .. , .
·>~: i;; ·:1:.c i..
at ret.i o'lt of 'll'iJ1t.cc, :ro~·. F:.:, l .. :. ~· ~ :'.J
.......
,:
L,.-1?i w,ls'
i •p.lcc~ !
s ,.:1• {~~ .. '"''""'0
\ ,tt c1o1rn Doo< ·
:}~~Hv~-~·.}~·-~.ifC}a.;.,, 0!1~!1~ ~: .. sin. i~-~debco, eai ~f. ·u·f;-~·1~~~-~.,Pt!in,; ~ u~:c!:elnr 0 to.-~Ile
«d of"t*50;ry:i) t1tt; a!!'"-·::io/10b 4'oll:•r-s ·_,(1111 ~l:.e> of ':)eriof!'..~ ';o !":in '.,y ,.~l!IOll cf l~vil!,S O\l.t
·:i-~~•h!~.~s publ_ic r¥. t.\rr;i~ hi,. ~·;:,;party. 4Q11 ':i'ni.ch 18 ho··~i,:.:,,ft,-r de11crJ.bo~, co1.1va)', J.:aloaaa,;
. , >_'Q..(i,~~ t. ·--M· ~lt:7)~ .nn.c:i' S.td• -~f *°&11:l"in._gtc:o.. ~V)' . ..:.io, ,:;;· ii:.o public !"O:.'. ve:r-, ill Q pu:C,lic ,1'J;;'."..,-•; . .:. -.. ' .;_,·, ', ·. ."'' . . .. ;
·: .. ~ i'l-'h"1ti..,~ ~ 41 '.ntareat ia. th:e £ollo1'11~ dcscrJ.1.cd ra:..l oi;'..:ik
0
v1::o
',.:.f"&ie ~ir~_'-·30 :ft • .:it·~htl :r.i-oi ~!!~ lfst of ti.ie S1'i of t::;c. 5,ll a! S·,c • .?7, Tn;. £5 :1. E, 4 Z, ,;',t.: ..
"l,~!~ O~_gj fC_':-.,..;~:..; -~_. i ..... ~.. .
:Blght .. c~ ~,.·n~ .11 •. li:imb.:.1to~·.d.
i;:f · :.;_;\,~'"f·~•,.cUi.,:,.r~.• in.;-~~·~ ta ~~e ::-1u'*"•
-~"!-.a..~_'-··tli(t ~~ qt !1ig, .State ot il'Ml:in.::.tau, ·'. · , ·. · ·.na.~a: t1:i1l 2L 4,v ~t . ,;11; "'~:n. 1::1;::J. . . --. . .. --. ..•
1.305}10
l
~;._;.:..,."-·.J;;·
F •• -t·
to
Lou!
i;olla.rn,
·'"9'=l.'ibed.
t
to pLit t.':
ot Ki:-:._·, S
fiitnc11!:es:
State ,ot if!
CoU1l~ -:if I
I,
; . 19~3, ;,el'rs~
tl'.o ind1v1rl
.'\rd. 11ao.lr11d
31
{?!:~ • .r.s.::(lt,
(Co..,. Ex .:.:Cr
Ff
Dollnrt Z!2ll
r.ot
Sit
Li!..t,
\!itae:,~a1:
,, '
i,,::,,,io11.H.ll;: !,!,
r,, ,1,_t ,,,,;
j ·:? !'l. ,;=
.:.·: .c
··.··<'\',·········
: :i.:;'. ;,.id dc:1ci fo; ~: c ,,.~c::: :,.-~-:;~-::p6:.cs ti:o.:rc!.., r-..c::tior,ad,
I
Gi.'i'e'" · :;.;• , _ _.:!,! =~ :ii':iicitl ,;~al t~·,1s £}rd ,1:..:.• ,yf ,;.t·..:,-..10::t ->.,D, l'.122,
lI p, S ,i,i;,G-tt~c::c-; :i..,!.i c~.:-.,Jlleil.)
J.:i.;:?;:son Silbo.trj'l
llotnr~•P'.lblic i:1 cm."-:.:or tlfo Stc.<;e of
·::n,:hin;,--ton, rrsili.c.: at Sr,,,.i,-:..1e.
}'il.;.:! ;,,~-z-,:,c1~'· {':-:--:,-:-; .. ·a:t of Po.:11 :&i.a.:e:1 ?Tov, i:fo, l'j2~, .:,,t lk, :.dn r,t.::it 10 AU,
........
,,
!;. E. Wf "~ r.l 1 ;:xc---· .,s ,,
j Jo=.t:, o~ ;o.11g, ~~: ';i' o::' ··:,..:'.:in..:;ton
~'-i · "i,"-!.t .::l.:,.i;.; l'.cc:!
1 The i:;,-n:-.:.or , :-. · in E. ::,;, i}"uff O.lJ.' T,~om."11! Ol~en ·.:-, F-"'"'l'-•':ci:?rs c:.· t!,e a:;.::;:a::: oz-. J,. \,, c.0.1:iri,1. ct
l :i.1., for ~}:Pt con,12~:!'at!.o:i ~-· or.c 1,d no/100 !!0141.•2.."n -. r,iso ~-_ l.ihvdita to e.c~rue -t() them b:-• r, ·C.al)n Qf
··1 layi~ ~tall,! est:.,-~li~!L,;. t', p-,;Olic rO!'.d t},n,:.;.'h ~--"ii' ,~·~1-ier Y,<'n:", ..b.ich 1,:i, h•T!:iD!l.fte;t" described,
11. pt:_blio raad nr.i hii)n-,r .. · .. ; ,: x1. :.1· ii1t;,l'.,r,t i.: ~.';.e follo..i.•}s. d..cscr.i.1:ocd re;:i.1. es.ta.te, Viz:
1'lw Z, .<.--0 t. or ht-1'1".} o~ tb.l' ·m~t 01 ~:,e ::·;.'}, c:-:cept t::..: r:. 30 tt. t: ~:eof r:.D:: ~i:o the if, 20
.--..1:~!:fl& iD the Cou.:,~.y of K1_t:...r, $tt,.tc ·of ·,·,•r.sf>ill{,'.ton,
•),; Da.t11!1. tl:J.S 2!1-t;;. d::) of :;ove.::·oc,l', ;,..Ji. 1:,-~3.
)
" )
!,;, ::: • .:,7.if
T:,o~· ~ Gl~ar,
~::cc·., c: -, .::. '.,e .:~ti:J,;e of J. C, Co1v'I..",,
t--
dJ .• ~· o, Ilove:,1,·_oi·, 1$2-1:Sl:'o:·e ,:c, -~. :;ot..,::;·· ::·.:·.,lie 1.: n:\ fo:• tho Ste.ti• of \!c;~hiI1,.;~on,'
,~-1.11ig01lltd,_o).Jll .:i.Votll 1 r.::.·.·&ODAll;f =·o Z. ::=. D -~. <' !'.'.,:.,::?,., ,:1.~_::;.1...::,0 ::1e k::o~,1\ ~s:, 1'e tl,e 1ix.1v1,:ua1e: .:IT "F"-. . • •
··.1i(a~. t':" · e%'..>~Ut..ed. tl1e ,;1t=..in_ 1n;,h~ .. m.int .'i.1,d r.c·:iod,:,d.5o,:l :;o 1.i:, t:;~.-t!·ey ~i,;-:-.ed. £Loli ~co.led
.;:i:· r.i:c \.;;:;:~ s ,:l. p-,·rr,o~e~· t::e:·-:.i;, 1.:catic:e,ed.
:i01.~;)'i:'f11c 1:, ::..:-.:2. ~o;· t~10 Sto.te of
,.'l'.~l.i '. :';o:., l'l!Ci.~L : u.t •
. f'?J:,-f• :)ojJ. a.t req,.ott of ~r..n'.f.olil, }!CY." :-:-~, 1 .. 2}, , t 13 · .. in p:1ct 11 ~ .....
Q,:.it ,:a ... im Dr,f!i,,
oF>f~~ini~;~ ·
; t~~~, ll~f1li.;.~~-.:::;1
.:~ms:~i:~~i;;co, ~Hf. UD1..:.:.·r-icd t,r.liDi.r :i. bncho1or, for ihe
__ ... · ·· .• 1:;1r .. ',!-t5G.oo) .. .:J~;-s:zid,i,:1,o/i'90' 3011;.l'l:i·ai:iu eleo of benon\,.,e ·~o~~t.i ''l rMBon o~ layi!Jl: out, · :.::, ;: . <: . ··. .' .''.... .. -: .. ' "' •. ,,..;.. ·=-.. o, ~~ ... , . . . ·." . .... ; ·._;~':.'~~+:;& .!l._y.:!.U~.road·-~xo~ .. ~a· p~oper~~· ~.Jd. -.bi.:ih iB hcrei=i"t"=l' de,acribo~, eouve;r, I"el~iuie,i
·.:.ii~lil:ta.~ Cpj:Ui,b;,_-of·~)~'sato of.\'ia8l'::l..ll,';~on, for w;~ of tho v.iblic :'O~"-'ver, 1M1 a. pu'l•lic ·
~-~~~~~-¥.:,1~."il:lt_e;_~;;;_{u ~e:;follOW1~ des;;1·i~ed rei<.1 oeW.to, ~:l.z;
.'-: . ~:~t:ti.jo it..';.~f.'i.fe'·>~f-o~ ~.e 11:;:i ,o_f ~i':.e SWt ot ~;,:~. 3Wl o, s.-,c, 27, TJ/p, 26 H, 11., :i,.;z.'jj,~ .. ,
. ~.~1~;0, :;; ~-,:,1:1, ' . .JQ1~·· ~t ,.;.Ji~··.: _ -_:. . .
·, .. ~J .. o(~. ~!:~-f,~-~~~-...... ,
~ ·~ .. ~H .:·.llli:9;:_tl .i!l· l"OIIA ,,.,.st· to .tl:.¢ ::r~ek.
, ':'"''~1\t-c.,-:t::_k~Jti:n:-:;;:1"•
1 .. 1tr.e-~: ~-• .:.;.arp . -. ·-·--·· ·:· "· t,~. 0,1,..:a~. c..±.:ld.
..at. of ~:!.!:".="'"..ii;;, )
" ~7 Tf1 ~..Ti<U>U,j.:,,_:,; } ~~·-
'::, ;"'-~ t.lie -2.J • (le.., ~f :.t ./ .bo£J»'e, m.~~_.t>t~.r ~lie L r:.W to; ~!19 St.s.te o"j: ~if01'r.ia., ~ ~~~~t~¥a
1605313
:a~:
(u 11 s_ zr.:;~.:.1.·1
"'' .:;;,;:·, ·1:.~' OJ:
Lot
to pl~t t::er
of Ki:!',e, Sta
"'' 'iiitnesses:
SU.to of ~
Cowity o! i:1
I,
. 1923. p,!l"!!.Ol
the iJJdivi11
tl1ld auled ·
j ~ior:od..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
Gi·
r~-J.S.Mot
Cor1 Ex J.:ar
!'1
m\iY 'fl
Sn;~ ~1cktll
" E. L • E1•,.,tl
n
Doll'l.l'B ru,:
" s
D
;11 tna,:i,~es:
-'.ite.i:(! oi :r
Co=t;r ,r
porsonall.1
iri, , nJ. -;;i:
1·:.ce .-.nd. ·1
{"' \? il ;?,:ii
(Com :::r. J-,
.,., 1/---
T>
f'.ff •,• ..
-~:~·]. ·=->.,.:.: ---~-":i";,,":);c·c•;,5c··S.··-__,,----------'--
/ !.t:.'SJ: •-. -;."4_"'11>. ,o,; ... , th<; '"-"" !net"""' . • " . "! , _ j l~rH,_~ .!tll!la-rlt-:d. i~tc.'J!t!. ~~ ~nqcd. t!i:1.f'""ri.; £dJ)1n! JJUl. se.:;.ie .... .ie '.'!,,me e..a ., 1:1 .. .-oo a...d V.::,l'l.».tal1'
~· .a.c:t ~ 4~ far tho ,u:011 ~ ~o.i;o• therei:.:i i;:;,. a,Uoned.
·_ _. ,n.ren u:,.:!oe, ~ :-~:-i ::.~ -off!;;~ ::.~al t:.is z31•a a:--3' of ,,-::gwit r..D. 192-2.
---.~.·.,1.:.1,,.·.; .. ·~ .. · .... -... ·~~.w S~ ) ~racbOJl. Silbaugh Y':, · -Bx h~,i..l.525 ; tlotar:.po,blic 11: and fo,, the State of·
. ,: .. · ',fo.tliillt,<rton• reisidi~ at :5_cnttl• •
.<· :;!J_tj\fi~--~ttaab•d. ~!ld ee.nca11...:i)
·:-s-,·'.;,._ , .. -~s .: --·
;C:,Ut;I ra.t: r'J<lOra 4: r-eiq-e:it of Pa•..! .Ent11en ]Jov • .::~, 192;, at 4~ ::.iin pa:::.13t 10 JU. .....
1.,¢t C.a.k: Dee,;!
~~~· e~•t" "f l1'11sl. ~n.,;tnn
,,._ i.tui t Cl.::i.iL: i:oce.
, :1tr~;-~ ~t.ir , 11:--rein ::, i:, D-,:iff .i,:rtl 'l"rtomaa 01:ien -,n ~P.,:.. ,·.o!'i! or t!'.e ~;:::;:;.t.: c;:r. J, ~. Gll.lvin et
-fol':'.~~ ,~n.i.i11ratiO;,_. of -i:i.e· ..-11.d no/100 r. ollE .. J. f.t'I .:i.lllG of t~·"11iita to 2ec-rua ·to them by .,., .e.110,.1 of
I
i
'
,:,:_~-~ -~', .. tllbbliGHi!c u.publ'ic·ro~d ·tnrcr.)611 t:!1>il .. ~~port~,• -i.l ;,j:Jich 11 h r, hiaf'ter C.uc:t-ibed, ·,.,._.-:e ,, ·.:· ·. , • ,· • •• L
. Jt/~l~ ~/~U-ohim :to t)1e. Co~ty of n:i~, s::.ate ~ l'fr.-··1\rie;to!l0 for --;i.·." o:· t!".lll pt blio forc\'or, I
t--~:·-.,.c',·-ott<-~,W :t.1i!a-AY, /:c1 ~l! int~rest" L: ~;,.o follo7""i;1c; dc.:1c1·.i.bed. :-e.'.ll BState, vh1 !
·-.; _., .<;.·.-· _ . , I · "M::"rtl; o'l'.:the.tt·'!t. 'O! tll9 _li:E:f.· ot ti1e lffl:l:, c::co;pt t:.-: ~. 30 ,.·t. tfJ. .: · :if ;:;r.; ab:o t<,e w. ·20 '
:}~~:_JEt.-ot-~~ ~ l!!xcept tt,e n •.. JO ft. t:h :--of; ·.11 1.-. ·:;cio. 1;, '.':·,1), 2;. :1, n. lj E.~.r.
· ~ -tir,-1ei:a: . Rit.;~1t-of~'.'t'~r.,, ..•. ,'r.~. ;.·:,_ .lk.i.:,. .. ,.,.G..
1 tit JL:c,'-E:ta.te -o! \'l'a.51.ingto:J.,
·:,~~<o~,~~oml>cr, ·~.ri. 1923~
,.o ::::rt: to ,1f ,T,C.~olvi
i
of V.a.1rhl.1Ji;;to11, I
' i
i
.(:e.b:t. ~~z,ie¢ 'bei~ A ba.d:I~ !Ol' Lba l
: , to-0~1...., -i ~~o p,f :l:~f'i~ ta l:i.UD. i1,.v :rflftffi rir 18:'iDii o,;lt, 1
\'.~ 1~ he:-e~f't"r.. h~or~--~ . .,~. ~];fue-f
t~-.u1•. o~· ~ pulilio·:t'or .. TM"J_ -,._a ~11.o '
i
I
•
Dollara, ,:i
L
to' plat th!
o! Xi~, S•
i
i ......... ~
State ti! I:
I ~t:r· ::if! I I I,
/ -192.}, :rue
! th• Ud.1't1d
' j
I
I
:ind .. ftlltd.
Uotted.
Gi
i11!~.J.S.Jf~t
CQl!:I h1""r
,,.
"'~r:,
SWIUL Jfiabli
to
E, t. E1•otcl
fit!:IB&::!alJI
Stci.t>c: -:i: ~.
Oou.:.ty or JC!
_; ·.-;,~,·1 .:
~.L.124 QUIT&r'a~~~--·u, -·-· R/w
180
\5
Th, i:nn~ ... _ . .Jierdn.:······'.t•J!.~A,...,...,. "'~r ··-,--,-···········-.. ·-·--
R.c. Curtia·, Vice P!"Hid.ent. & Jot.n &., 'f'ol'ter·.1 Au_is t!:'.nt St,ci·~tar-y
• -... ' -•• h _ .. -·· • • -·' ... ,~ ••• " ·····-~-~----~·-· -•• .............. • --
Iot th 11, coaatderatkm. oL~ er,;.,, PWJ,6 'ftri:rl:eell -~-l9t)a,)...~:..,, .. .,.. ... .., .. :.,. ... ~ .. ,, ... "··"· .. "···'"-,&Thu'i1
I (!7.13., '°'"'"'"r -•-.,.,...,. ..., ..... ,.... .. -. an<!: af&t'· ~ ttf•ci!nWf to:..-.. .u:..:.._ .. ____ ,_; _____ , __ 'o, ni:utm·ot byl.ci; l)Ut and esttlillahl11c a public road
thro:uJh ___ iti ______ ,: .. praperty, nd ~bSeh II ~~ ~ 1:;0nVI)' A., re~.1.., ai;id ql(iklalm .. a
to the County of ........ 111llL ................. ,; ..... _ .. , .......... '.·:···--·-···-·State of Wa::h.lnJ{lon, fo; t1&1..01 the Publlt ·
fo~~~r. u ,. p_ublk. rf,~i;t_ and hJ1hwr:r, •ll b1t.eree~ ln the followtni ~bed 1'efll e,ta.te, viz::
Tb& .}forth, 35 feet <~i: ·th~ N .BJ ot. tbe. ~.11.\ ot tbo. lf.~.t. Or tbe w.w.t in:S.gtlOi:r l'S, twp. 2! i.R. 5 !:.'ti'~Mi.t 1••• th• Wut· l.50.t"eet •.
001,tai~ng 0 .. 02 Aoru m.orti or, leu. · . .. ·
R/W s.E. 123th St. ( 132'14 Ave. S.R. to 168th Ave. S.E.)
the riabt lo mako! all nW'..3111'1 lllopu for_cuta 1.1>.d fll~ upon the·ahulUn n ··
ea.eh atde of u.ld In nnfonnit · · n apec:iftcatfo~u f_or hl1\1'1
waY l!Uri,;an, and t.'l t e . . -' · herein rranted had been acqulrt1¥:
&)'. a; o~ p~.;Jliu u~d~r Eminent Dart!aln t1t!l.t!!te! of the Sta ~ o ~. j· __ ·•
1itu11ted in. the County of.. ......... ~Ya .... , State of Wublag:ton.
Dated thla .... ~.:?..~ ....... dar oL ..... '..J.ID.v.tn... .. . .... , A. D., 11t.~~ .... ..
J:s' \\'1T:,,,;ESs WHERi:Of',.!o;l·id (o.tporatiOh. has nll.Std thili instrument to be execut~ IJY its proper officers
-.and Its CO!plltate St'a\. lo be hereun\o _atfjnd lhh da)' or "Jsnuary,"· 19~5,
H\l(B].Z OIL &. REFINIHG COlP.ANY ....... ,, ... ,-...
f
•
.-... ...,
Sale a t-Jear:C;:"hrk. ChQmt
~ -+en:nr::·14.
)4111 3 t, PHH~
.llnl 2'\ 2 3; r~ '1'1
WADlilA~. ~D &""Uu.~K™'ti'!"· •Ma....l,j
•
k:
R/W LIOB 110
Tlw! pantoc.....a....____herein_ CHOON S. PARK 1. ID JEAN C-PARJ(, Husband
and Hj.fe, ----------·····-------·-~-
for tN c!Jll!l;Jerat10f. of_,/ C!.l2L.~--------------------------Dollar,
and other Yalu1.ble cOJ11ideratiim, C')fl"Jl') __ ant wuunt_lo the Cour.ty of Kinr, State ufWuhincton,
all :Jlb!Nlt in. lbe roll0111in1 described real eat.~:
The North jso feet of the ,ortheast 1/4 of the Nor''rwest 1/4 of the
Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 15, Township 23 North,
Range 5 East. W.M., situate in King County, Washington;
LESS the West 150 feet thereof, and
LESS the County rolds, and
l[SS coal and mineral rights.
DEED TAKE:
That portion lying Hortheasterly of the arc of .!I c·:cle having a
radius of 25 feet, sa1d eirtle being tangent to a line 35 feet
South of .:1nd parall~l to th!!! North linP. of i:afi:I !;.UMhrision and
tangent to a line 20 feet West of and parallel to the ta>t line
of said subdivision.
Contains an area of \35 sc:. ft.
R/W 1108 -S.E. 128TH STREET
FIIII Fer heard At The Reqo0$I Ill
~~.t.~ ~ .. Ceooaty ~perty Division
W~AA
JUN:?.41987
'E()9'1917'i' ..
.,:.,,:,
..... ~ .• oo
t.opQft •ilk llie riallt tc _ .... u .-en..,-1:i., . ~ ... rm • .,.. .......... ,..,...,.
ea:li •• ti..,. hlM wliic• m •ow, or .. , I,,. ["'lit. • .rlll:btd _..._ • -w ..-.,.rt.J, la ~---
wit.Ii ---4 ,,_. _. e,-cif'ie.UO.. far ilipn) ,......, ... to tM __. n:tnt ..a ,..... •
if U. ripa ._.., .,.... I..& ._. •c1111..d b1 eoadeautiaa SNCNifap .,,,;~, Ka__. 0-.. _., ... _., __ _
•iladal ia tM Coa, ol Kias. Slate otW••---·
-•-'----''"""t"'h'----'*7 •"'----""=X<------.t.. n JL!!
-----l l(
------------
I
STATE OF WASJ!lNGTON
COtJllTY Cf lWIG
I f ..
•
on lhe ....... 3 .. 0 .......... day or ........... ":.1JJ.t!,,Y ............... , 19.£Z before me, a Noiary Publ1c Jn
and to.-the Stall! of Washington, duiy comm!Ml.or.i~ artd S1"'0rl'I, pe-rsOtwly c~ ... Cf.'.r..~:Y .... f. .. /&'tt'
...... 'J.ift,L .... <;;. ........ f"ll:.i( . to me >.nown to"' tho 1n4Mdual. •...
dacrlbed ln and .. executed the within instrument and acknowkdgtd to me that... ..... ., ..... .al.pied
and aaled I.he IIDlt u ............................ .tree and \'OlWltacy act and dtt:d for Lhc ,ma 1U1d ptu JlCll!I,
ihttdn mentioned. _ ..... ---··· ... _ .. __ .. ---·-· ---· .......... __ .. ···--.. ,_. __ .. ______ ...... _ _/'} .
ff'""-•• , ·--------••< -, -·· ';l!{ .. ~?!./i':7f .i;, i,;.;;;;;:;;.;;;:
Affllfln,1 at .. ~ .............................. .
tCORJ'OJtAnON A<::KN0\71..)';[IQl(Etl't FOR.Ml
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
Cornitt or Kt>ra,
On this. . ... dayo/
to me knoWJi to be the
I , ...
.... be(are me penonaJty a.ppeared
and
.... and ............................ ,_._
of the corporation that executed the !ongoing iru~rumt-nl, and. acMowte:lgl!d aid instruruut to be
the Cree and voluntary act and d«d of said COJ'J)Or.11ion, r<.,· th~ ~ and purpose5 therein mm-
UOJ1t:d, and on oath staled that . authortud to necu~ &lid Instrument and
tbaL the llt:l..l affll:ed ~ the corporate wil of said corponiticn.
Gn'tn under my hand and orficlal seal lhe d2y and year lasr above writ!tfl.
0 ij i:.:l ~ " ~ a
Cl "' ~ ! !.!
:,i !:! I~ .. g f j io
"' 2
! IJ
Nal.t#"'IJ t'11Wil" In 11114 /or t/'J4 s,111, Of 'F"'Uhtngtim,
BAilflng 11.t
~ :;
Ii ~ !i f 8 ,g
'
l .; i
§ ..
" 1 0 !
~ i .5 ;
1! J 1! ~
• ~ 1~ 5
• ~ ! I
0 0 "
FIRST AMERICAN, F •• FAST KING, WA
12/27/2011 07:16PM -ORDER SEARCH PAGE 1 OF 2
AAT RESULTS .
ORDER: 520794T/AG TOF:KP COMMENT:
SEARCH PARAMETERS
APN: 152305-9124 (PERMIT DATEDOWNS)
CURRENT TAXES THROUGH 2011-06-03
APN: 152305-9124-03
TRA: 2100 -RENTON ACQ 1999-DOC#: 1 99072300189L DATE:07-23
LEGAL: SEC 15 TWP 23 RNG 05 QTR NW; 152305 124 N 180 FT,
MEAS ALGE MGN, OF NE 1/4 OF N\N 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF
NW 1 /4 LESS W 150 FT LESS STS LESS C/M RGTS
SITUS: 4615 4TH ST
MAIL: 3933 LK WASHINGTON BLVD #100 KIRKLAND WA 98033
ASSESSED OVVNER(S) 2011 ASSESSED VALUE~
EASTSIDE FUNDING LLC LAND 441,80(
EXEMPTIONS (0:
TAXABLE 441,80(
2011 TAXES 1STINST 2ND1NST TOTAL TAJC
STATUS "'*DELO** **DELO**
INSTALLMENT 2,704_ 12 2,704.12 5,408_2L
AMOUNT PAID (0_00) (0_00) (O.oo:
PENALTY 446_18 148_73 594.91
INTEREST 324_50 108.17 432_6,
BALANCE DUE 3,474_80 2,961.02 6,435.8::i
ASSESSMENTS CODE TYPE AMOUNl
9420 WEED CTL 2.2!:
9430 SOIL CON 9_9E
2100 5,396_01
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
USE CODE: 410
FIRST AMERICAN, FAK, FAST KING, WA
12/27/2011 07:16PM -ORDER SEARCH PAGE 2 OF :.l
AAT RESULTS
ORDER: 520794 T/AG TOF:KP COMMENT:
PRIOR YEARS DELINQUENT
BACK TAXES THROUGH 2011-06-03
YEAR DELQ APN
INST# BILL BASE DELQ
TYPE AMOUNTAMOUNTSWM PENAL TYINTERES1
2009 152305-9124-03
BOTH 4,409_93 4,409_93 485_09 1,411_18
....,"..,." "11h'>6:>n,=;, ~-1_..,A O"'=t
201 0 152305-91 24-03
BOTH
•
4,925.34 4 ,925 .:::
AMOUNT TO REDEEM FOR: DEC
541.79 985.07
JAN FEB
12,758.40 12,851.75 12,945.10
ORDER
402844T/AG
520794T/AG
TOF
KN
KP
OPEN ORDERS ON FILE
OPENED UPDATED
2009-06-
30
2011-12-
27
CONDITIONS, DISCLAIMERS AND EXCLUSIONS
This Tax Certificate/Tax Order Report does not constitute a report on
or certification of: (1} mineral (productive and/or non-productive} taxes
or leases; (2) personal property taxes; or (3) other non ad valorem
taxes (such as paving liens, stand-by charges or maintenance
assessments}.
Data Trace Information Services LLC ("Data Trace") may have
warranted the accuracy of this Tax Certificate/Tax Order Report to its
customer (the "Data Trace Customer'') pursuant to the terms and
conditions of a written tax service agreement between Data Trace and
said Data Trace Customer (the "Tax Service Agreement"). Any such
warranty (hereinafter, "Data Trace Customer Warranty") does not: (a)
extend to a third party bearer of this Tax Certificate/Tax Order Report;
(b) cover any changes made to the records of the taxing authority
after the "payments as of," "paid," or "payment" dates delineated
above; and (c) cover any invalid tax information shown on the records
of the taxing authority or resulting from an error by the Data Trace
customer (including, without limitation, submission of incorrect
property information by said Data Trace Customer). DATA TRACE
MAKES NO WARRANTIES (EXPRESS OR IMPLIED) WITH RESPECT
TO THIS TAX CERTIFICATE/TAX ORDER REPORT OTHER THAN
(WHERE APPLICABLE} THE DATA TRACE CUSTOMER WARRANTY.
Any and all claims under a Data Trace Customer Warranty must be
submitted to Data Trace by the corresponding Data Trace Customer
and are subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the pertinent
Tax Service Agreement (including, without limitation, the filing
deadlines applicable to such claims). In some jurisdictions Data
Trace's validation of a Tax Certificate/Tax Order Report is required to
activate a Data Trace Customer Warranty.
END SEARCH
Page: 1 Document Name: untitled
RPCI 152305912403 Il22911 DOC: 10/31/11 REVALUE' ST:CURNT ACTIVE
EASTSIDE FUNDING LLC 059999
3933 LK WASHINGTON BLVD #100
KIRKLAND WA 98033
N 180 FT,. MEAS ALG E MGN, OF
12/29/11 NE 1/4 OF.: NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF
NW 1/4 LESS W 150 FT LESS
STS LESS C/M RGTS
LOT:15-23-05 BLOCK:9124 LAST LEGAL
IS 4
INTEREST
432.66
985.07
1,411.18
RY OY
11
10
09
BILLED
5,408.24
4,925.34
4,409.93
RY OY ST SC NC LEVY OM-LV
13 T 2100
12 T 2100
11 T 2100
10 T 2100
09 T 2100
RPCI 152305912403 I122911
PAID
.00
.00
.00
LAND
441,800
441,800
441,800
441,800
441,800
JUMP CODE:
,! 1
" PENALTY
594.91
541.79
485 .09
AMOUNT DUE
6,435.81
6,452.20
6,306.20
12/29/11
TOTAL: 19,194.21
IMPS . BILLED PAID PA
.00 .00
.00 .00
5,396.01 .00 F
4,.913.11 .00 F
4,397.70 .00 F
TOTAL DUE: 14,743.51
ADDITIONAL DATA P/N
YEAR RECEIVABLE TYPE LEVY BILLED AMT PAID AMT ACRE BENEFIT
11 NOXIOUS WEED 9420 2.25 [".00
11 CONSERVATION 9430 9.98 .00
10 NOXIOUS WEED 9420 2.25 "'.00
10 CONSERVATION 9430 9.98 ,.oo
09 NOXIOUS WEED 9420 2.25 .oo
09 CONSERVATION 9430 9.98 .00
DATE NUMBER AMOUNT INT/PENALTY YEAR DISTRIBUTION receipt data
10/18/10 333728 11,369.02 3,248.29 08
03/29/10 461424 12,082.66 3,813.71 07
RPCI 152305912403 I122911 JUMP CODE: P/P
Date: 12/29/2011 Time: 7:57:44 AM
•
,•
King County Property Tax I nation Real Property Page
• KING COUNTY HOME j NEWS I SERVlCES j DIRECTORY ] CONTACT
King County Ecommerce
Property Tax Web: Real Property Account Information
Aeeount/Parc:el Summary
Tax Account Number 152305912403
Parcel Number 1523059124
Account Status This account is active.
LTc.:•::.:x..:.P.;:•e.Y•::.:r..:.N..:.•:cm:c•:_____ __ E'~_T-~~-F_U~DING LLC 059999 ----·---------! Mailing Address 3933 LK WASHINGTON BLVD #100
KIRKLAND WA 98033
Payment Statu$ DELINQUENT FIRST HALF 2012 AND PRIOR YEAR(S) AMOUNT DUE IF
e--------------....J-P_A ____ I_D __ Oc_R P_OS~~~EI> ___ BY JULY 31, 2012.
f-A_n_n_u_a_l_S_ta--'te-'--m'--a--'n-'-1 ccR.:.•q"-u'--e'-=s..:.t•..:.d..:.:cB"-y--+------------·------------------------1
Statement Request
Select Paymont Amount
Actions
R~ueslJJJalemen.t.J9 be MaileJl
Cuaenl Year Tax
Pay First Half 2012
Pay Second Half 2012
-----------~elect
$3,279.47 r::
$2,928.08 C, 1
?rlor Year Delinquent Tax ~
Pay 2011 S 6,814.39
Pay 2010 $6,796.97
, Add To Cart 11 View Cart .1 r Search Again 1 ---__________ ___J_l==-cc-=====:'.!::===='=='c! ------·~
TO PAY MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS WITH ONE PAYMENT: To pay mulliple accounts with one payment click on the "Add lo
Cart" button above. On lhe nexl screen you will be presented with an option to complete your paymenl or you may click
"Search Again" to continue locating and adding accounts 10 yours.happing ciart. You will be ab[e to delete single accounts.
from your cart prior to making a payment.
If you woukl like to pay by mail, plea~e make your check payable to King County Treasuiy, write your tax account number
on your check, and send it 10:
f{jng County Treasury
500 Fourth Avenue, Room 600
Seattte, WA sa104
Tax Year Detalls Receipts
~12 Tax Information
, Ta)(:
j other Charges
i Noxious Weed
Conservation
Total billed:
Amount paid: $ 0.00
Interest $175.69
Penalty: $175.69
2012 Balance:
2011 Tax Information
Tax:
Other Charges.
Noxious Weed
Conservatioll
Total billed:
2012 Tax/F~ Distribution
--
$5,843.94. Land value: $441,800
Improvement value: $0
$2.25 Levy eode::2100
$9.98 Status: Taxable
$5,856.17 Omit year: 0000
$ 6,207.5:5
$5,396.01 Land value;$ 441.800
Improvement value: $ 0
$2.25 Levy code:2100
$9.98 Status: Taxable
$5,408.24 Omit year: 0000
Pagel of2
http://payments.kingcounty.gov/metrokc.ecommerce.propertytaxweb/Rea!Property.aspx?P .. _ 7/25/2012
King County Property Tax Info ion Real Property Page
Amount paid: $ 0.00
Interest: $ 811 .24
Penalty;$ 594.91
2011 Balance:
2010 Tax Information
Tax; ..
Olhet Charges
Noxious Weed
Conservstion
Total billed;
Amounl palct: $ 0.00
Interest:$ 1,329.84
Penalty:$ 541.79
2010 Balance:
2009 Tax Information
Tax;
Other Charges
Noxious Weed
Conservation
Total billed;
Amounl paid:$ 4,409.93
Interest: $ 0.00
Penalty: $ 0.00
2009 Balanee:
I •=...I
$4,913.11 Land value: $441,800
lmprovem8nl value: $ O
$ 2.25 Levy code:2100
$ 9.98 Stalus: Taxable
$4,925.34 Omit year: 0000
$6,796.97
$4,397.70 land value:$ 441,600
Improvement value: $ O
$ 2.25 Levy code:2100
$ 9.98 Stalus: T.;ixab1e
$4,409.93 Omit ye;1r: 0000
$ 0.00
Links to extemal sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By vlsrting this and other
King County web pagos, you expressly a1:1ree to be bound by terms and c.ondllions of the site.
Tu!roLOLU.se I fi:f~a(;y .E_oll._cy:
c20,2 King County
Page 2 of2
I
http:! /payments. king county .gov lmetrokc.ecommerce. propertytaxweb/Rea!Property. aspx ?P... 712512012
Printed: 09-26-2012
CITY OF RENTON
1055 S. Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Sfp 2 6 21)1; Land Use Actions
RECEIPT
Perm it#: LUA 12-083
i11 !tc;'([)L~'§W'~f!5J
Payment Made: Receipt Number: R1204413
Total Payment:
09/26/2012 01:16 PM
2,060.00 Payee: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc
Current Payment Made to the Following Items:
Trans Account Code Description Amount
3080 503.000000.004.322 Technology Fee 60.00
5010 ooo.000000.001.345 Environmental Review 1,000.00
5020 000.000000.007.345 Site Plan Approval 1,000.00
Payments made for this receipt
Trans Method Description Amount
Payment Check 29777 2,060. oo
Account Balances
Trans Account Code Description Balance Due
3021 303.000000.020.345 Park Mitigation Fee
3080 503.000000.004.322 Technology Fee
3954 650.000000.000.237 Special Deposits
5006 000.000000.007.345 Annexation Fees
5007 000.000000.011.345 Appeals/Waivers
5008 ooo.000000.001.345 Binding Site/Short Plat
5009 ooo.000000.001.345 Conditional Use Fees
5010 000.000000.007.345 Environmental Review
5011 000.000000.007.345 Prelim/Tentative Plat
5012 ooo.000000.007.345 Final Plat
5013 000.000000.007.345 PUD
5014 000.000000.007.345 Grading & Filling Fees
5015 ooo.000000.007.345 Lot Line Adjustment
5016 000.000000.007.345 Mobile Home Parks
5017 000.000000.007.345 Rezone
5018 000.000000.007.345 Routine Vegetation Mgmt
5019 000.000000.007.345 Shoreline Subst Dev
5020 ooo.000000.001.345 site Plan Approval
5021 000.000000.007.345 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence
5022 000.000000.007.345 Variance Fees
5024 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Approval Fee
5036 000.000000.007.345 Comprehensive Plan Amend
5909 000.000000.002.341 Booklets/EIS/Copies
5941 000.000000.007.341 Maps (Taxable)
5998 000.000000.000.231 Tax
.00
.00
.oo
.oo
.00
.00
.00
.00
.oo
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.oo
.00
.oo
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
1ing Balance Due: $0.00