HomeMy WebLinkAboutREPORT 01CITY OF RENTOO
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
Date: November 20, 2013
To: City Clerk's Office
From: Lisa M. McElrea
Subject: Land Use File Closeout
Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City
(-iPrVc ()ffiC'P_
Project Name:
4426 Residential Design Modification
LUA (file) Number:
LUA-12-088, MOD
Cross -References:
AKA's:
Project Manager:
Gerald Wasser
Acceptance Date:
October 12, 2012
Applicant:
Stan Durman, Durman Construction
Owner:
Contact:
Stan Durman, Durman Construction
PID Number:
3211000460
ERC Determination:
Date:
Appeal Period Ends:
Administrative Decision:
Approved Date: October 12, 2012
Appeal Period Ends: October 24 2012
Public Hearing Date:
Date Appealed to HEX:
By Whom:
HEX Decision:
Date:
Appeal Period Ends:
Date Appealed to Council:
By Whom:
Council Decision:
Date:
Mylar Recording Number.
Project Description: RESIDENTIAL_ DESIGN STANDARDS MODIFICATIONS
Location:
4426 SE 3rd PL
Comments:
ERC Determination Types; DNS - Determination or Non-signincance; unti-m - uezerminanon or
Non -Significance -Mitigated; DS - Determination of Significance.
DEPARTMENT OF CC AL..ITY ... Cjtyof
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT �--- — C �' T!
.
MODIFICATION OF RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR
PROJECTS WITHIN THE R-4 AND R-8 ZONES
APPROVAL [-] DENIAL
EVALUATION FORM & DECISION
An "X" is shown in the applicable residential design requirement box. When an alternative is
employed that requires a modification, the staff evaluation is written on the lines below. The
decision to approve or deny the requested modification can be found at the conclusion of this
form.
PROJECT NAME: 4426 Residential Design Modification
PROJECT NUMBER: LUA12-088, MOD
PROJECT MANAGER: Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner
APPLICANT: Stan Durman, Durman Construction, 4660 367th Avenue SE, Fall
City, WA 98024
ZONING DESIGNATION: Residential - 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8)
PROJECT LOCATION: 4426 SE 3rd Place
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Maintain the design of the existing structure instead of adhering to
all of the Residentrial Design Standards. Because a proposed
addition is valued at 50 percent or more of the most recent
appraised or assessed value of the existing house, compliance with
the Residential Design Standards is required.
1. Primary Entry
Choose one:
❑ Stoop (minimum 4'-6" x 6' and 12" above grade); or
❑ Porch (minimum 5' deep and 12" above grade); or
® Alternative that meets guidelines. The front facade of the existing house has a
covered entry. However, that entry does not comply with the porch and stoop
requirements. The proposed 640 square foot addition which is triggering
compliance with the Residential Design Standards would be located at the rear of
the house and would not be visible from the street (SE 3`d Place(.
City of Renton Deportment of Co iii, d Economic Development Administrativ d)fic n Request Report & Decision
4426 Residential Design Modification LUA12-088, MOD
Report of October 11, 2012 Page 2 of 4
2. Facade Modulation
Choose one:
❑ Facades visible from street are offset (minimum 10' wide x 2' deep on a minimum one
story); or
❑ One street facing facade is offset (minimum 2' deep first story from second); or
® Alternative that meets guidelines. The existing house and the proposed addition are
one story in height. Because the proposed addition is at the rear of the existing
house no changes to the front (street facing) facade are proposed.
3. Windows and Doors
Choose one:
❑ Windows and doors constitute at minimum 25% of all facades facing streets or public
spaces; or
® Alternative that meets guideline. Windows and doors constitute approximately 20%
of the existing street facing facade. Because the proposed addition would be at the
rear of the existing house no changes are proposed to the existing street facing
facade.
4. Roof
Choose one:
❑ Hip or gabled with at least 6:12 pitch; or
❑
Shed roof; or
❑ Alternative that meets guidelines (Explain)
And if more than nine (9) lots choose one:
❑ A variety of roof forms are used; or
® Alternative that meets guidelines. The applicant is proposing to maintain the current
roof pitch on both the existing house and the proposed addition. The building
addition would be at the rear of the existing house and would not be visible from
the street (SE 3rd Place). Such roof pitch would be compatible with the existing
neighborhood.
S. Eaves
Choose one:
❑ All eaves project minimum of 12" and have horizontal fascia with a minimum of 5"
(Fascia -gutter is acceptable); -or
® Alternative that meets guidelines. The applicant is proposing to maintain the current
roof design on both the existing house and the proposed addition. Because the
City of Renton Department of Cc ni d Economic Development Administrati difi n Request Report & Decision
4426 Residential Design Modification LUA12-088, MOD
Report of October 11, 2012 Page 3 of 4
addition would be located at the rear of the existing house and would not be visible
from the street no changes in roof or eave design are proposed.
6. Architectural Detailing
Choose one:
® Trim (minimum of 3 - 1/2") around all windows and doors; or
❑ Shutters on windows and trim (minimum 3 - 1/2") around doors; or
❑ Alternative that meets guidelines (Explain)
And, if one siding material is used on any side that is 2 stories or more, choose one:
❑ A horizontal band (minimum 8") is used between the first and second story; or
❑ Alternative that meets guidelines (Explain)
7. Materials and Calor
Choose one:
® The house is a different color than the abutting homes, or
❑ Alternative that meets guidelines (Explain)
And, choose one:
® At least 2 colors are used (body with different color trim is acceptable); or
❑ At least 2 different siding materials are used (siding & shingles, siding & masonry,
etc.); or
❑ Alternative that meets guidelines (Explain)
8. Garages
Choose one:
❑ Recessed 8' from the front of the house and/or front porch; or
❑ Roof extends 5' beyond garage front at least the width of the garage and the
porch/stoop; or
❑ Alley Accessed; or
❑ Located so that the entry does not face a street or an access easement; or
❑ Sized so it represent no greater than 50% of the front fagade width at ground level; or
❑ Detached; or
® Alternative that meets guidelines. The existing house does not have a garage and
one is not proposed. An existing attached open carport is located on the street
facing fagade. The applicant proposes that the carport remain in its current location.
And, if the garage is wider than 26', choose one:
❑ The portion greater than 26' is setback at least 2'; or
❑ Alternative that meets guidelines (Explain)
City of Renton Department of Cc ni . d Economic nevefopment Administrati &fi on Request Report & Decision
4426 Residential Design Modification _ LUA12-088,_MO_D
Report of October 11, 2012 Page 4 of 4
RMC 4- 9-250D.2 Criteria for Modification of the Standards.
The requested modification must also meet the following criteria:
1. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and
maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering
judgment; and
2. Will not be injurious to other property(ies) in the vicinity; and
3. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and
4. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and
S. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity.
The proposal satisfies 5 of the 5 criteria listed in RMC 4-9-250D2 for approval of modifications.
Therefore, the primary entry, fagade modulation, windows and doors, roof, eaves, materials
and color, and garages modifications of the residential design standards for the proposed
single-family residential structure, Project Number LUA12-088, MOD are approved.
LM
. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator
Department of Community & Economic Development
2Date12-
Date
The decision to approve the modifications will become final if not appealed in writing together
with the required fee to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,
WA 98057 on or before 5:00 pm, on October 24, 2012. Additional information regarding the
appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's office, Renton City Hall — 7th Floor,
(425) 430-6510.
If you have any further questions regarding this decision, feel free to contact the project
manager, Gerald Wasser, at 425.430.7382 or gwasser@rentonwa.gov.
Exhibits: 1. Site Plan
2. Rear and Front Elevations
3. West and East Elevations
EXHIBIT 1
-4P
Pi
LU GO
a -
JUL IS 2u1
IE
�
i1
rt
a
LD
0
rn
f
p$
Z
U
m0
n
En
LL
CD
Lu
d
Q
1�
Q[Lufr-
w Lu r
a
mf:fl w
to
W
o v
Mfz
Q{ 00
E-�
o cr
E— in 0� o .�
LU GO
a -
JUL IS 2u1
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 3
m
R
C
0
� a �
j A �
x
C
C N �
O O A
u
� 4
o v a
M t �
� u
o u
.
c }
o�
E a
o w a
— X
i u
�
} Q
Q
N
u
]��
EXHIBIT 3
m
R
C
0
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA. 98057
Sep. 10t', 2012
Permit # B120293
To whom it may concern, -_.
Regarding the property at 4426 SE 3rtl s6ek permit # B120293, this letter is a request
for modification of the Residential Design Standards (RMC 4-2-115). As part of the
modification we will be installing 5/4 x 4 trim around all windows and doors. Thank you
for this consideration.
r�
Stan Durman
425-633-4343
stan@durmanconstruction