Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutREPORT 01Rocale Timmons Plan Number: REV13-000435 Permit Number: B13001726 Site Address: 439 RAINIER AVE S City of Plan Review Routing Slip Project Name: Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Rainier - CANOPY Description: CONSTRUCT NEW FUEL CANOPY FOR FRED MEYER GAS STATION Review Type: Planning Review - Building ❑ Approved Date Assigned: 05/05/2014 ❑ Approved with Conditions Date Due: 05/19/2014 ❑ Not Approved Please Enter; Comments under REV # Conditions under Permit # Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date �Gt4A(j 71 - Jan_ Jan Conklin Rohini Nair City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING May 2, 2014 COURIER DELIVERY RE: Response to Comments - Engineering and Planning Review Fred Meyer Fuel Center 431 Rainier Avenue South, Renton, Washington City of Renton Permit No. 1313001726 Fred Meyer Store No. 4591Our Job No. 13245 Dear Jan and Rohini: RCOpy We have revised the plans and technical documents for the above -referenced project in accordance with the Plan Review Comments found on the City of Renton website and printed on January 27, 2014. Enclosed are the following documents for your review and approval: 1, Three (3) complete full-size 22- by 34 -inch plan sets including civil, utility, grading, landscape and irrigation, architectural elevations and details, canopy photometric plan, canopy structural plans (prepared by Madison Industries), kiosk structural plans (prepared by Frey -Moss Structures), tank, and electrical plans The following plans are included as part of the complete submittal package to address requests by the Planning Division relative to the original site plan approval process: a. Three (3) full-size 22- by 34 -inch color copies of Sheet EX -2, the fuel canopy's architectural elevations illustrating at the project scale the architectural enhancements specified on the color and materials board b. Three (3) full-size 22- by 34 -inch color copies of Sheet EX -3, the project's revised site plan c. Three (3) full-size 22- by 34 -inch color copies of Sheet EX -4, the project's revised landscape plan d. Three (3) full-size 22- by 34 -inch color copies of Sheet EX -5, a color and materials board prepared for this project illustrating the enhanced cladding provided on the columns and the kiosk base e. Three (3) full-size 22- by 34 -inch copies of the photometric plan for the fuel canopy prepared by Galloway 2. Two (2) subsets of the complete plan set including architectural elevations and structural plans (canopy and kiosk), as well as the canopy photometric plan 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (4 251 251 -622 2 (425j 251-8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • TUMVVATER, WA • LONG BEACH, CA • WALNUT CREEK, CA • SAN DIEGO, CA www.barghausen.nom Jan Conklin Rohini Mair City of Renton Development Services Division -2- May 2, 2014 3. Two (2) subsets of the complete plan set including civil, landscape and irrigation, temporary erosion and sediment control plan, and utility plans (including water, sewer, and stormwater improvements) 4. Two (2) copies of the Technical Information Report (TIR) and Stormwater Report 5. Two (2) copies of the Declaration of Covenant for Inspection and Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities 6. One (1) copy of a formal request for approval of a Site Plan i Minor Administrative Modification, required by this project and consistent with the recommendations of City of Renton senior staff concerning the requirement for a permanent generator and screened pad as discussed at our meeting of February 6, 2013 on a similar project (see below) 7. One (1) Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. check (No. 83043) payable to the City of Renton in the amount of $103.00 covering processing fees associated with the required modification. The following outline provides each of the comments from the website in italics exactly as written, along with a narrative response describing how each comment was addressed: Engineering Review Rohini Nair Ph: 425-430-7298 email: mair@rentonwa.gov Engineering Plan Review Comments Created On: 1211912013 Landscaping plan corrections to coordinate with the elements installed by the City CIP project on Rainier Ave. Response: Per your comment, minor adjustments have been made to our landscape plan to better integrate our landscaping with the existing utilities and City -constructed improvements along the Rainier Avenue frontage. Subject: Fred Meyer fueling station- proposed green screens on Rainier On discussion with Transportation regarding the location of the green screen, followed up with correspondence with Rocale, please revise the landscape plan to move the screens from Rainier (only) and submit to both Rocale and me for approval. Please consider adding additional vegetation to the plan in order to provide adequate screening in place of the green screens. Response: The comment is acknowledged; the landscape plans remain consistent with those reviewed and approved by Rodale Timmons via email (December 12, 2013), Please show the extruded curb that was recently placed by the City on the back of the sidewalk in the plans. Response: The extruded curb is now shown. Jan Conklin Rohini Nair City of Renton Development Services Division -3- May 2, 2014 The following are the engineering plan review review comments for the Fred Meyer Fueling station project. Water review 1. Water note 8, provide an Reduced Pressure Backflow Assembly (RPBA) in hot box is to be provided instead of the DCVA. This is to provide protection at the hose bit. Response: We have corrected water note No. S per your comment. Sewer review 1. Provide minimum 12" vertical clearance between the side sewer pipes at the crossing. Response: Adequate clearance has been provided per your comment. Storm review 1. The detail included in sheet C9 — spill control structure does not show the tee. Please update. Response: We have updated the detail on Sheet C9. 2. Include in the final TIR a copy of the approved covenant and bond quantity worksheet. Response: Copies of the Declaration of Covenant and Bond Quantity Worksheet have been included with this submittal for final review. 3. To expedite the review, you can send to Hebe Bernardo directly (and cc me) the electronic files of the documents listed above for review and approval. Please send Hebe the pdf files of the drainage plans and bond quantity worksheet. Response: Files were sent via email to Hebe Bernardo in August and September 2013. No comments were received at that time and no revisions were made. 4. Two copies of the final TIR will need to be submitted to the City with the mylars. Response: Pending final review, the complete TIR — with covenant and worksheet included — will be delivered with mylars when the project is completed, Water Review Comments 1. Sheet C6: Include City of Renton details of domestic water meter in hot box. Standard plans 350.2. Response: City of Renton standard details have been added to Sheet C6. Jan Conklin Rohini Nair City of Renton Development Services Division -4- May 2, 2014 2. irrigation meter requires a DCVA as per landscape plans. Show DCVA as per City of Renton standard plans 340.8, Response: We now show DCVA per City of Renton standard plans. 3. Add a note on the water utility sheet regarding the existing water meters that will be cut and capped including sizes on the water plan sheet. Response: A note has been added per your comment. 4. Seethe attached scanned plan sheet. Response: Corrections have been made to fully comply with the comments noted. Wastewater/Sewer Review Comments Plans are approved. Response: The comment is acknowledged. Storm Review Comments Already sent to Engineer under separate cover. Response: The comment is acknowledged Transportation / Street review Comments 1. All frontage improvements will be constructed by the City Capital improvement project along Rainier. Response: Project improvements have been fully integrated with the City's frontage improvements and existing utilities. Planning Review- Building Rocale Timmons Ph. 425-430-7219 email. rtimmons(EDrentonwaagov Planning Comments Created On: 1011712013 1. Landscape; The minimum shrub size is two gallons; one of the shrubs were identified to be one gallon. Please update plan set to have two gallon shrubs. Response: The shrub size has been increased per your comment. 2. Lighting: A lighting plan was not provided with the building permit application. A lighting plan shall be submitted identifying compliance with both Design District lighting standards and light trespassing standards. Response: With no added lot lighting being provided, lighting on site will be sourced from the canopy's lighting fixtures as well as any secondary illumination provided by the adjacent Jan Conklin Rohini Nair City of Renton Development Services Division -5- May 2, 2014 street lighting in the public right-of-ways. A photometric plan is included with the complete plan sets illustrating foot-candle values clearly falling within established guidelines and mitigating any spillover onto adjacent properties or rights-of-way. 3. Sign - Note to applicant: The application included some sign related items. Signs are not permitted though the building permit process, a separate sign application is required to be submitted for review and approval. Response: The proposed monument sign and base will be permitted separately after the conclusion of the permitting process for the fuel center. Based on our preliminary discussions with staff, the proposed sign appears to fully comply with existing code. The proposed use of illuminated text and a corporate logo on the fuel canopy have been previously reviewed by staff and determined to be substantially compliant with the appropriate design standards. Modification On February 6, 2014 the Fred Meyer Design Team met with City of Renton staff to discuss comments and the required mitigations associated with the QFC Fuel Center project located at 4th Street N.E. and Duvall Avenue. Given that the QFC project and this project share a common regulatory basis, several design elements associated with both projects are reflected in these revised plans. A separate letter details the adjustments made to allow for the use of a portable generator instead of a permanent generator located on a separate, screened pad for both the QFC Fuel Center and the Fred Meyer Fuel Center. We believe that the above responses, together with the enclosed revised plans and technical documents, address all of the comments from the City of Renton. Please review and approve the enclosed at your earliest convenience. If you have questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at this office. Thank you. Si Obert P. McNeill Senior Planner RPM/dm 13245c.023.doc enc: As Noted CC" Chris Taylor, The Kroger Co. (w/enc) James Coombes, Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. Jay Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Jason Hubbell, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. F. Al Kendall, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Chris Ferko, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. What's on your list today? You'll find it at FredMeyer FRED MEYER STORES • P.O. Sox 42.121 • Portland, OR 97242-0121.3800 5E 22nd Ave. - Portland, OR 97202-2999.503 232-8844 • http://www.fredmeyer.com Ginger L. Pullen Paralegal (503) 797-5611/,Flax (503) 797-5613 gingerp��llenC�-edme ver. corn VIA OVERNIGHT MAIL February 12, 2014 Mr. Bob McNeill Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 1821572 d Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 RE: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. - Renton #459 Declaration of Covenant for Inspection and Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities Dear Bob - I have enclosed the above -referenced original declaration for recording with the county. Please pass this to the City of Renton with the instruction that they may record the document, only after the permit allowing construction of the fuel station has been issued to Fred Meyer by the City. After the declaration has been recorded, will you please e-mail a copy of the recorded document to me. Thank you very much for your help with regard to this declaration. Sincerely, Ginger L: Mullen Paralegal Enclosure cc: Mr. Ian Ford Mr. Jim Coombes Mr. Dan Hermann Mr- Dan Lamotte "Always strive to offer Customers the service, selection, quality and price that satisfies them best." Fred G. Meyer, Founder, 1886-1978 Q:TLU,GLP',Rcn1 Estate%Rmzurn,Mcneill 021714.Duc RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF RENTON 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98057 DECLARATION OF COVENANT FOR INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF STORMWATER FACILITIES Grantor: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. Grantee: City of Renton Legal Description: PARCEL F, CITY OF RENTON BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LUA 99- 017, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9904069001, BEING A PORTION OF HENRY H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37; GOVERNMENT LOTS 11, 13 AND 16 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AND TRACTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 OF SUPPLEMENTAL MAP OF RENTON SHORELANDS; EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 20110811001002 Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#: 000720-0209-08 IN CONSIDERATION of the approved City of Renton building permits for application file No. LUA/SWP 12-095 relating to that portion of the real property depicted in the Stormwater Facilities Maintenance Plan attached hereto ("Property") described above, Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. ("Grantor"), the owner in fee of that Property, hereby covenants with the City of Renton, a political subdivision of the state of Washington ("Grantee"), that it will observe, consent to, and abide by the conditions and obligations set forth and described in Paragraphs 1 through 10 below with regard to the Property, and hereby grants an easement as described in Paragraphs 2 and 3. Grantor hereby grants, covenants, and agrees as follows: 1. The Grantor, or its successors in interest and assigns (Owners of the described property), shall at their own cost, operate, maintain, and keep in good repair, the Property's Stormwater facilities by using its best management practices ("BMPs"). The Stormwater Facilities were constructed as required in the approved construction plans and specifications on file with the Grantee and submitted to the Grantee for the review and approval of permit #s 613001726, 613001727 and 013001730. Q:\CLDNIAN\Real Estate\Renton`<Fu i\Dec Of Covenant Stormwater FaciliVeSAOCK 1 The property's BMPs are shown and/or listed on Exhibit A. The property's stormwater facilities and/or BMPs shall be maintained in compliance with the Stormwater Facilities Maintenance Plan on file with the Grantee. Stormwater facilities include pipes, swales, tanks, vaults, ponds, and other engineered structures designed to manage and/or treat Stormwater on the Property. Stormwater BMPs include dispersion and infiltration devices, native vegetated areas, permeable pavements, vegetated roofs, rainwater harvesting systems, reduced impervious surface coverage, and other measures designed to reduce the amount of stormwater runoff on the Property. 2. Grantee shall have the right to ingress and egress over those portions of the Property necessary to perform inspections of the stormwater facilities and BMPs and conduct maintenance activities specified in this Declaration of Covenant and in accordance with RMC 4-6-030. 3. If Grantee determines that maintenance or repair work is required to be done to any of the stormwater facilities or BMPs, Grantee shall give notice of the specific maintenance and/or repair work required pursuant to RMC 4-6-030. The Grantee shall also set a reasonable time in which such work is to be completed by the Grantor. if the above required maintenance or repair is not completed within the time set by the Grantee, the Grantee may perform the required maintenance or repair, and hereby is given access to the Property, subject to the exclusion in Paragraph 2 above, for such purposes. Written notice will be sent to the Grantor stating the Grantee's intention to perform such work. This work will not commence until at least seven (7) days after such notice is mailed. If, within the sole discretion of the Grantee, there exists an imminent or present danger, the seven (7) day notice period will be waived and maintenance and/or repair work will begin immediately. 4. If at any time the Grantee reasonably determines that the stormwater facility or BMP on the Property creates any of the hazardous conditions listed in RMC 4-4-060 G or relevant municipal successor's codes as applicable and herein incorporated by reference, the Grantee may take measures specified therein. S. The Grantor shall assume all responsibility for the cost of any maintenance or repair work completed by the Grantee as described in Paragraph 3 or any measures taken by the Grantee to address hazardous conditions as described in Paragraph 4. Such responsibility shall include reimbursement to the Grantee within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the invoice for any such work performed. Overdue payments will require payment of interest at the current legal rate as liquidated damages. If legal action ensues, the prevailing party is entitled to reasonable costs or fees. 6. The Grantor is hereby required to obtain written approval from Grantee prior to filling, piping, cutting, or removing vegetation (except in routine landscape maintenance) in open vegetated Stormwater facilities (such as swales, channels, ditches, ponds, etc.), or performing any alterations or modifications to the Stormwater facilities and BMPs referenced in this Declaration of Covenant. 7. Any notice or consent required to be given or otherwise provided for by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective upon personal delivery, or three (3) days after mailing by Certified Mail, return receipt requested. q:\CLD\IAN\Real Estate\Rerton\Fuel\Dec Of Covenant Stormwater Facilities.Docx 2 & With regard to the matters addressed herein, this agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, and all agreements whatsoever whether oral or written. 9. This Declaration of Covenant is intended to protect the value and desirability of the real property described above, and shall inure to the benefit of all the citizens of the Grantee and its successors and assigns. This Declaration of Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon Grantor, and Grantor's successors in interest, and assigns. 10. This Declaration of Covenant may be terminated by execution of a written agreement by the Grantor and the Grantee that is recorded by King County in its real property records. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Declaration of Covenant for th Inspection and Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities and BM Ps is executed this _12— day of JC.x 2014. FREDIYE,,RSTORES, INC. Vice President STATE OF OREGON ss. COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH j On this day personally appeared before me: L(f (j.1 veil -jam) ', i to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein stated. Given under my hand and official seal this I2 day of %Ci 2014. OFFICIAL SEAL PAMELA JO CHILD NOTARY PUBLIC -OREGON COMMISSION NO. 457937 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 02, 2015 q:�CLD\IAN%Real Lstate\Rentun�Fuel%Dec Of Covenant Stormwater FacilitieS.Dvcx 3 44-) CGS LC tP Printed name Notary Public in and for the State of Oregon, residing at e.f_C: L� 2,vyxc;N C.Q ' My appointment expires 15�, -7- -j fW:i:i1C�fI II_1 This project contains a stormwater management system as required on the approved construction drawing #G5 on file with the Grantee. This plan shall be submitted with the application for any building permit. Maintenance of the onsite stormwater management system is the responsibility of the Grantor. 2. The rain garden is a stormwater management BMP used to mitigate the potential effects to stormwater runoff quantity and quality from the increased impervious area due to development. The rain garden has three main components that must be maintained: (1) the roof drain outlet from the canopy, (2) the rain garden vegetation and, (3) the catch basin outlet to the detention. vault. The rain garden as designed may not be changed without written approval from the Grantee or through a future development permit from the Grantee. Maintenance of the rain garden is the responsibility of the Grantor. A stormwater treatment and detention vault is used to treat and detain the runoff from the developed site to pre -development runoff rates. The detention vault has five main components to maintenance: (1) good housekeeping, keeping trash and debris picked up, (2) sediment accumulation in the vault, (3) the vault structure itself, (4) the control structure and, (5) the inlet and outlet pipes. The stormwater treatment and detention vault as designed may not be changed without written approval from the Grantee or through a future development permit from the Grantee. Maintenance of the detention vault and control structure is the responsibility of the Grantor. 4. Maintenance of the onsite conveyance system including the catch basins and trench drain are the responsibility of the Grantor. 5. Maintenance of the onsite oil/water separator and the appropriate removal and disposal of accumulated sediment or oil is the responsibility of the Grantor. b. Maintenance of the Stormfilter manhole and media cartridges is the responsibility of the Grantor. 7. Maintenance of the catch basins and pipe systems within the public right-of-way is the responsibility of the Grantee. Q:\CLD\IAN\Real Estate\Renton\Fuel\Dec DfCowenant Storrowatet Facilities.Docz STORMWATER FACILITIES MAINTENANCE PLAN Fred Meyer Fuel (Store #459) 431 Rainier Avenue South Renton, Washington 98057 Prepared for: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. 3800 S.E. 22nd Avenue Portland, 4R 97202 January 23, 2014 Our Job No. 73245 1.0 2.0 PURPOSE A. This Stormwater Operations & Maintenance Plan has been developed to assist facility personnel manage spills and prevent storm water pollution at the facility. Awareness training for facility personnel responsible for storm water pollution prevention, spill containment and cleanup, and maintenance at the facility will be conducted. Instruction will include an explanation of the rules governing spills, the requirement for good housekeeping practices to prevent storm water pollution, and discussions of possible incidents and their appropriate responses. B. This Pian will be kept at the site and also reside on the Fred Meyer intranet website. The Pian will be available for inspection by the City of Renton upon request. CONTACT INFORMATION Facility: Fred Meyer Fuel #459 Renton 431 Rainier Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98057 Ownership: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. 3800 SE 22nd Avenue Portland, Oregon 97242 Key Site Contacts: Fred Meyer Fuel Kiosk: 360 -------- Adjacent Fred Meyer Store: 425.204.5200 Fred Meyer Maintenance (Portland): 503.797.7490 KCAC, 2417 Emergency (Portland): 800.962.2749 City of Renton: City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, Washington 98507 Business Office: 425.430.4600 Spill Hotline/Operations: 206.684.1231 13245.005.doc 3.0 INSTRUCTIONS A. Inspection Frequency: Monthly Stormwater System Inspection & Maintenance Log: The form included in this Plan, or a web -based equivalent, will be completed by a Fred Meyer Associate, or assigned vendor, each month. All completed Logs will be available at the site and copies will be included in the annual report. Annual or Periodic Maintenance Log: The form included in this Plan, or a web - based or vendor form equivalent, will be completed by a Fred Meyer approved vendor annually; or periodically as determined by Fred Meyer Maintenance. A report of each maintenance event will be included in the annual report. B. Annual Report to City of Renton A brief annual Inspection and Maintenance Report is due to the City of Renton Public Works Department by August 18 of each calendar year and shall include the following: • Name, address, and telephone number of the businesses, persons or firms responsible for plan implementation, and the person completing the report. • Time period covered by the report, generally the previous calendar year • A chronological summary of activities conducted to implement the maintenance plan. A photocopy of the log sheet and applicable checklists (with any additional explanation needed) should normally suffice. For any activities conducted by service providers, include a description of tasks and the contact information for the service provider, or include copies of the work orders or invoices for services. • An outline of planned activities for the coming year 4.0 DESCRII'TION OF THE SITE The fueling facility consists of 9 fuel dispensing islands, a free-standing canopy, and a cashier's kiosk with restroom. The project includes two underground gasoline storage tanks: one 20,000 -gallon and one 18,000 -gallon dual (10,000/8,000 gallons) for unleaded and diesel fuels, as well as site paving, landscaping, and utility infrastructure to serve the fuel center. The main Fred Meyer retail store building is located on the adjacent property to the West. The fuel station under -canopy area is hydrologically isolated from the adjacent parking lot and drive areas. The under -canopy stab is graded to drain to two under - canopy catch basins (CB#1 and #2). These catch basins discharge flows through underground piping to a nearby oilfwater separator vault (V #1). The outlet of the separator is equipped with a close off valve which is to be closed in the event of a spill. The valve can be operated using a "T" handle wrench, which is kept inside the fuel kiosk. The oil/water separator discharge pipe runs northerly, then westerly, where it then connects to the adjacent sanitary sewer system. 13245.005.doc Stormwater runoff from the surrounding areas, adjacent to the fuel station, is directed away from the canopy slab and toward a storm water "Filterra" unit (F#1). This landscape structure filters runoff prior to discharging stormwater to the underground stormwater system. Stormwater is then directed northerly to a junction manhole (CB #1), which also collects the canopy rooftop runoff. From there, the storm water is conveyed northerly until it connects to the storm water piping in the Fred Meyer store parking lot and conveyed off-site to the Public storm system. 5.0 SITE AND FACILITY MANAGEMENT A. Pollution Source Control Plan All pollutants present onsite shall be handled and disposed of in a manner that does not cause contamination of stormwater. Good housekeeping and preventative measures will be taken to ensure that the site will be kept clean, well organized, and free of debris. All equipment, and petroleum product storage/dispensing areas will be inspected regularly to detect any leaks or spills, and to identify maintenance needs to prevent leaks or spills. • Spill prevention measures, such as drip pans, will be used when conducting maintenance and repair of equipment. Contaminated surfaces shall be cleaned immediately following any discharge or spill incident. B. Chemical Storage and Solid Waste: All chemicals used, stored, or displayed for retail sale shall be kept in appropriate containers and kept covered. • Solid waste, which includes liquid waste, will be stored in closed or covered containers. C. Vegetation Management Plan, Landscaping and Pest Control The landscaped areas surrounding the east, west, north, and south sides of the proposed fuel center must remain stabilized with sufficient groundcover to prevent sediment -laden soil from flowing into the parking lot and storm system. Adequate landscaping sprinkler and vegetation maintenance must be performed. Only Fred Meyer approved vendors are allowed for landscaping and pest control chemical application. 13245.005.doc • After evaluating the need and options available, applications of any pesticide or herbicide shall comply with federal, state, and local regulations. The applicator shall be trained, and licensed in Washington. • The quantity and concentration of any fertilizer, pesticide or herbicide shall be in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations to maximize the effectiveness and limit multiple applications. • Diligent attention shall be given to control overspray and avoid impervious surfaces including curbs and asphalt. • Care shall be taken and measures implemented to prevent and control spills while mixing. Each service technician should have a supply of spill response supplies available and be properly trained to respond to spills of all chemicals used. 6.0 STORMWATER FACILITY DETAILS A site map and storm water system component diagrams are included in Appendix B of this plan. The components include: • QilANater Separator Vault — V #1 • Storm Water Catch Basin — CB #1 • Storm Water Catch Basin — CB #2 • Filterra Stormwater Treatment Unit - F#1 • Storm Drain Manhole -- CB #3 13245.005.doc Authorized Contractor Annual or Periodic Maintenance Log (page 1 of 2) Date: Work performed by: Contractor company name: Contractor technician name: Notes: • Confined space entry procedures may be required for some types of maintenance work. It is the responsibility of the contractor to understand and follow these important safety requirements. Oil/Water Separator -- V #1 f ] 1. Measure sediment depth. If the sediment depth exceeds 6" the structure will need to be cleaned of all sediment using a vacuum truck. [ ] 2. If petroleum product has accumulated on the water surface; skim the surface clean using a vacuum truck. [ ] 3. Inspect covers and internal structure and report additional maintenance or repairs recommended. Close -off Valve downstream of Oil/Water Separator [ ] 4. Confirm traffic lid can be easily removed and clean top of valve and surrounding area to expose for easy visibility. [ ] 5. Confirm valve operation using "T" handle wrench located in fuel kiosk. [ ] 6. Inspect covers and internal structure and report additional maintenance or repairs recommended. Storm Drain Catch Basins — CB #1 and CB #z [ ] 7. Grates or covers removed, water and debris vacuumed out. [ ] S. Inspect outlet trap (where present) for functionality and report repairs needed. [ ] 9. Inspect grate/covers and basin structure. Deport repairs needed. 13245.005.doe Authorized Contractor Annual or Periodic Maintenance Log (page 2 of 2) Water Quality Catch Basin — Filterra Bioretention Systems F #1 [ ] 10. Maintenance shall be performed per Manufacturers recommendations, provided in Appendix B of this Plan. Storm Drain Manhole Structure — CB 93 [ ] 11. Measure sediment depth. If the sediment depth exceeds 6 -inches, the structure will need to be cleaned of all sediment using a vacuum truck. [ ] 12. Remove any trash or debris in the manhole or outlet pipe. [ ] 13. Inspect lid and basin structure and report repairs needed. Piues [ ] 14. Clean if accumulated sediment or debris restricts flow or exceeds 20% of pipe diameter. Odor, sludge or unusual color in any structure or pipe [ ] 15. Remove and dispose of contaminant by appropriate methods. Report unusual or unknown contaminant. 13245.005.doc Monthly Stormwater System .Inspection & Maintenance Log Inspection Date: Inspected by: Inspection Time: Is it raining during the inspection? yes no Contractor service required and service request entered? yes no Close -off Valve Inspection: ❑ Inspect surface and structure covers for A short distance west of the Oil/Water settling broken or missing parts. Separator is a lid for a close off valve. ❑ If a spill has been reported, close the The valve can be operated using a "T" valve. Call the Fred Meyer Facilities handle'wench located inside the kiosk. Maintenance Department for prompt vacuum truck service. ❑ Confirm the "T" handle valve wrench is inside the kiosk. Under -Canopy Catch Basins — Inspection: CB 01, 92: ❑ Check for surface trash or debris and clean as needed. The under -canopy drains are protected ❑ Check the water surface inside the basin from the weather and discharges to the and report unusual or floating debris, or a Oil Water Separator vault. heavy sheen of fuel. ❑ Inspect surface and structure covers for settling, broken or missing parts. ❑ Immediately report any fuel spill which enters any drain basin. Filterra Water Quality Catch Basin - Inspection: F #1: ❑ Check for surface trash or debris and clean as needed. The "Fiiterra" storm water catch basin ❑ Check for standing water, and/or clear is designed to capture sediment from bypass. stormwater and absorb petroleum ❑ Inspect surface and structure covers for products using a specially designed settling, broken or missing parts, filter media mixture. E Immediately report any fuel spill which enters any drain basin. Drive Aisles and Parking Lot: Inspection: ❑ Check for surface trash or debris and The drive aisles and parking lot surface clean as needed. should clear of trash and debris. Heavy ❑ Clean spills and/or call Maintenance for sheens of gasoline or oil should be cleanup using a vacuum truck cleaned up. 13245.005.doc NORTH IF OL 1 0-A A CB#i CB #3 FRED MEYER RENTON CENTER #459 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE EXHIBIT SITE LAYOUT OIL/WATER SEPARATOR CHAMBER DIAMOND PLATED INSPECTION COVERS OlL RETAINER BAFFLE FLOW DIFFUSER PLATE ACCESS DOOR GRIT/SLUDGE RETAINER WEIR INSPECTION TEE 77/ INLET RIM e a- y- RISER OUTLET A e a SECTION A -A 3/16" GALV STEEL PLATE SECTION B -B BAFFLES AND WEIR FRED MEYER RENTON CENTER #459 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE EXHIBIT OIL/WATER SEPARATOR VAULT - V #1 PIAN VIEW 29' SQUARE �j 1 24" SQUARE SIDE VIEW GRATE SHALL HEEL PROOF Si#9PR99F, HEAVY DUTY TRAFFIC GRATA: SUPPORTS AASHTO H25 LOADS GRATING urLET NOTES: BOX FABRICATED FROM 10 GA, MATERIAL /—OUTLET I } z Q inq 1 SEDIMENT 4V/ HiNr, P, �Au L22x2zxl6 ISOMETRIC SECTION STATE AFOPQVEC --- ASD IA'_T C,FPEr) 24" SQUARE - 4"0 OR 6"0 OUTLET STORM WATER CATCH BASIN DWG # PROJ. MAN. DOUG P. DWN. PAUL C LE SCANONE ClCson $feel $�elne DATE- JAN. 23, 06 MODEL: CC910—J0H9-4h6 �rxca :art 247 Washington 5t, Eugene. Or. 97401 ph: (541) 047 — $672 fax:344-0207 FRED MEYER RENTON CENTER *459 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE EXHIBIT UNDER -CANOPY CATCH BASIN #1,2 -T- L L CQ �j 1 24" SQUARE SIDE VIEW GRATE SHALL HEEL PROOF Si#9PR99F, HEAVY DUTY TRAFFIC GRATA: SUPPORTS AASHTO H25 LOADS GRATING urLET NOTES: BOX FABRICATED FROM 10 GA, MATERIAL /—OUTLET I } z Q inq 1 SEDIMENT 4V/ HiNr, P, �Au L22x2zxl6 ISOMETRIC SECTION STATE AFOPQVEC --- ASD IA'_T C,FPEr) 24" SQUARE - 4"0 OR 6"0 OUTLET STORM WATER CATCH BASIN DWG # PROJ. MAN. DOUG P. DWN. PAUL C LE SCANONE ClCson $feel $�elne DATE- JAN. 23, 06 MODEL: CC910—J0H9-4h6 �rxca :art 247 Washington 5t, Eugene. Or. 97401 ph: (541) 047 — $672 fax:344-0207 FRED MEYER RENTON CENTER *459 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE EXHIBIT UNDER -CANOPY CATCH BASIN #1,2 FRED MEYER RENTCN CENTER #459 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE EXHIBIT FILTERRA (NATER QUALITY VAULT - F #'1 , s -a• - - x• -o• , a' -o- r---I-r------------------------------ I II I I I � Po bay Baa aq I �A�Qdd J�njlnp�b���ff� Q Q oCsO ��a ab� !J �Qa I L-------------- - - ---------J C!JFB (Hf OFI+ERS) FLOW FLOW PLAN VIEW PLANT AS SUPPLIED BY AMERICAST (NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY) TRENCH FRAME & GRATE CAST IN TDP SLAB TREE FRAME TERRAFLUME CAST IN TOP & GRATE SLAB TOP SLAB 27.65 WEIR TRAY OUTLET PIPE �z f7JVERT 23.82 f j ENGINEERED MEDIA j UNDERDRAIN STONE PROVIDED 6f AM€AXAST PROVIDED BY AMERICAST A MULCH PROVIDED SY AMERICAST TOP OF TOP ELEVATION 26.32 2607 20-D7 $ECTION A—A UNIT TO BE SET PLUMB AND LEVEL �[ c 2—e DATEr — 05-29— 13 mm DWG: Erle= } x7— I I ! 13x7 F 2- 8 LEFT FILTERRA INTERNAL BYPASS -CURB WITH Z JUNCTION CHAMBER us ..s U".27. ('up•nrl�i ! :uu7 hr 4�a�ctJ C, ""Jzl M4 7.x'3,+,7 FRED MEYER RENTCN CENTER #459 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE EXHIBIT FILTERRA (NATER QUALITY VAULT - F #'1 I CATCH BASIN FRAME AND VANED GRATE OR MANHOLE RING AND COVER HANDHOLD N * RECTANGULAR ADJUSTMENT SECTION OR CIRCULAR ADJUSTMENT SECTION FLAT SLAB TOP d� •p 4S.• W, OV, 72, WOR Or P o• :R ".' MORTAR (TYP.) R P STEPS OR LADDER MORTAR. FILLET n �I ��rs-rte SEPARATE BASE CAST -IN-PLACE 'O" RING 12" a^ GRAVEL BACKFILL FOR ST: o PIPE ZONE BEDDING SEPARATE BASE PRECAST 4� I P' Zj 9 ME d REINFORCING STEEL (iYP.) `- GRAVEL BACKFILL FOR PIPE ZONE BEDDING INTEGRAL BASE PRECAST VWTH RESER FRED MEYER RENTON CENTER #459 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE EXHIBIT CB #3 NOISNIHSVWNOIN321 HinOS EnN3AV a31NM:f SOti NO`J32f0 'ONV-WJOd ,nom �' �x3 JdPOV3 ONI-13ni iJ3A3A 03d -i EmN3AV ONZZ '3'S 008£ saes :szrs¢r NVId 3dVOSONV� 032fO�0O OJ 2f3J021?1 3Htzzt�M'IN A x i isC86 tlM'SN3N �� S�zEC ;aP1 ;1Oj F — ILLnas Ir1N3AVCNEL S lZU (tY 14 ,...„,. 4d s ti i r � DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITYT1, °f"�c�AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 'tb ',..; MINOR MODIFICATION OF FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER #459 - PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT MANAGER: APPLICANT: CONTACT: PROJECT LOCATION: RENTON CENTER APPROVAL [-] DENIAL EVALUATION FORM & DECISION Fred Meyer Fuel Center #459 — Renton Center LUA12-095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD Clark H. Close, Associate Planner Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. c/o James Coombes, Senior Entitlements Manager, 3800 SE 22nd Avenue, Portland, OR 97202 Robert McNeill, Senior Planner, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., 18215 72"d Avenue S, Kent, WA 98032 431 S Rainer Avenue, Renton, WA 98057 SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a minor modification to the approved site plan. The modification is requested in order to eliminate service element screening. The modification addresses the removal of a concrete pad, permanent generator and a fixed enclosure. The landscaping and curb have been modified to reflect the changes. The requested modifications are summarized below: 1. Design Guideline modification from service element screening requirements in RMC 4-3- 100E.1, to eliminate the requirements for screening for a temporary generator. Project Description: Fred Meyer Fuel Center received Site Plan review approval on May 2, 2013. The guideline for service element location and design identified that service elements shall be concentrated and located so that impacts to pedestrians and other abutting uses are minimized and mitigated with landscaping and an enclosure with fencing or other quality materials. The applicant originally was required to provide a permanent generator in the northwest corner of the site. It has been approved by the City of Renton Emergency Services Department to allow the development to provide a portable generator in the event of extended power outages instead of a permanent on-site generator. In the event of an extended power outage, the portable unit would be mounted on the rear wall of the kiosk. As such, the applicant has asked to remove the requirement for screening of a temporary generator. Given the utility is temporary, no screening would be required for the temporary generator unit. City of Renton Department of Community and Economic Development Administrative Modification Request Report & Decision Fred Meyer Fuel Center #459 —Renton Center LUA12-095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD Report of May 12, 2014 Page 2 of 2 ANALYSIS OF REQUEST: The following tables contain an analysis of the criteria outlined in each respective section of RMC as it relates to the specific modifications requested: 1) Design District Guideline Service Element Location and Design Criteria Met Guidelines: Service elements shall be concentrated and located so that X impacts to pedestrians and other abutting uses are minimized. The impacts of service elements shall be mitigated with landscaping and an enclosure with fencing that is made of quality materials. DECISION: The proposal satisfies the criteria specified for service element modification as demonstrated above. Therefore the modification, as indicated, for Fred Meyer Fuel Center #459 — Renton Center, Project Number LUA12-095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD, is approved. C.E. "Chip" Vincent, CED Administrator � 1 Date The decision to approve the modification(s) will become final if not appealed in writing together with the required fee to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 on or before 5:00 pm, on May 26, 2014. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's office, Renton City Hail — 7th Floor, 425-430-6510. If you have any further questions regarding this decision, feel free to contact the project manager, Clark H. Gose, at 425-430-7289 or cclose@rentonwa.gov. City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. c/o James Coombes, Sr Entitlements Mgr ADDRESS: 3800 SE 22nd Avenue CITY: Portland OR ZIP:97202 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 503-797-5697 (Phone) 503-797-3539 (Fax) APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: COMPANY (if applicable): ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER: CONT" NAME: Rny COM' VI)� 1, ADDRES � V� CITY.- : G (� TELEPHONE NL mvp Direct Line: 425 Corporate: 425-1 bmcneill@a barghai EXCEDWatalForms-Templait —ndoutsTlanning%mastrrapp.doc I - PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECTOR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Fred Meyer Fuel Center #4591 Renton Center PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 431 S Rainier Avenue Renton WA 98057 ICING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 00072©0209 EXISTING LAND USE(S): Commercial Retail PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Commercial Retail I Fuel Facility EXISTIN,r 'MPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: r 1-3orridor l CC 1PREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION Change Proposed i �y 'ICA )plicable), r ROADWAYS TO BE ACCESS EASEMENTS: .atDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET 411cabie) NIA NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) NIA NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): NIA 03111 PROJECT INFORMA NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): 6,8801 Canopy & 1201 Kiosk SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NIA ... Vacant NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): 7,000 SF 1 Fuel Canopy & Kiosk Combined NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): 1-2 per Shift! TBD TION (continued PROJECT VALUE: $ 825,600... estimated IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): A AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA NIA sq ft. ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD NIA sq. ft. © HABITAT CONSERVATION NIA sq ft ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES NIA sq ft © WETLANDS NIA sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Attach le al description on separate sheet with the following Information included SITUATE IN THE SW 114 QUARTER OF SECTION 18 , TOWNSHIP 23 . RANGE 5E , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Namels) }:.4 I l'1 Ct'^!.t , declare under {penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that I am (please check one) the current owns f the property involved in this application or the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the Inf' ation herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signatp-re of-ownailepresentaf Date Signature of Owner/Representative Date STATE OF WASi•I N&TON ) t COUNTY OF KtNO ) 1 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that �t,-4 s i'• �'k'" ' V - r-! signed this Instrument and acknowledge It to be 9hedthelr free and voluntary act for the uses and purpose mentioned in the Instrument. Dated Notary Public In a. d or the State of Washington E OFFICIAL 144Y GSE Notary (Print): GINGERLPULLEN NOTARY PUBUC ; t COMMWION NO. 924870 My appointment expires: dAMMIQN EXPREFEBRUARY 8 r H:ICEDOata\Forms-Teniplates\.fielf-Help handoutslPlanninglmasterapp.doc -2- 031t1 FRED MEYER STORES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF INCUMBENCY The undersigned hereby certifies that she is the Assistant Secretary of Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., an Ohio corporation (the "Company"), and that the following persons hold the position set forth opposite his/her name below: President Lynn T. Gust Senior VP & Chief Financial Officer David Deatherage Vice President Richard S. Heffner Vice President Robert Currey -Wilson Vice President & Assistant Treasurer James C. Aalberg The undersigned further certifies that the signature of the person set forth below is the true and genuine signature of such person: Name Lynn T. Gust David Deatherage Richard S. Heffner Position President Senior VP & Chief Financial Officer Vice President MEWN).1M Robert Currey -Wilson Vice President James C. Aalberg Vice President & Assi ant Treasurer__.._ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed and delivered this Certificate of Incumbency on this 27day of April, 2013. Nona M. Soltero, Assistant Secretary FRED MEYER STORES, INC, ' I, Nona M. Soltero, Vice President & Assistant Secretary of Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of . Ohio (the "Company"), do hereby certify that the following is a true and exact copy, of certain resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company through an action by unanimous written consent dated as of March 8, 2012-; and I further certify that these resolutions have not been amended, modified or rescinded and remain in full force and effect: RESOLVED, That any of the foHowing persons be, and they hereby are, authorized for and on behalf of the Company to sell or transfer real property, and to execute and deliver deeds and any other documents necessary or incident thereto where the consideration for any such sale or transfer does not exceed the sum of Fifty Million Dollars ($50,000,000) in the aggregate in one transaction, to wit: the President, any Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President, any other elected. Vice President, and any other person duly authorized by the President; and that the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary may impress thereon the seal of the Company and attest the execution of such deeds or other documents, and be it further RESOLVED, That any one of the aforementioned persons be, and each hereby is, authorized for and on behalf of the Company to contract for the purchase by the Company of real property, and to execute and deliver any documents necessary or incident to such purchase where the consideration for any one such purchase does not exceed the sum of Fifty Million Dollars ($5%000,000); and that the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary may impress thereon the seal of the Company and attest the execution of such contracts or other documents, and be it further RESOLVED, That any one of the aforementioned persons be, and each hereby is, authorized for and on behalf of the Company to acquire equipment, real property, leasehold interests in real property and other interests relating to the Company's operations and to execute and deliver documents necessary or appropriate in connection with such acquisition, where the aggregate consideration for any transaction or series of related transactions does not exceed Fifty Million Dollars ($5o,000,000); and be if further RESOLVED, That any one of the aforementioned persons be, and each hereby is, authorized for and on behalf of the Company to execute all documents related to the disposition of Company interests by leasing, subleasing or assigning of leases, for real property used or acquired by the Company in connection with its operations where the aggregate Q5iG717MPTW=1nM REAL ESTATE RE90UMON (ODee consideration for any transaction or series of related transactions does not exceed Fifty Million Dollars ($50,000,000), and be it further RESOLVED, That any one of the aforementioned persons be, and each hereby is, authorized for and on behalf of the Company, to grant easements, right -of --wap dedications and such other instruments necessary for the partitioning and/or development of the real property of the Company, and be it further RESOLVED, That any one of the aforementioned persons be, and each hereby is, authorized for and on behalf of the Company, to execute all documents necessary in such officer's judgment, to enter into one or more partnerships or limited Iiability companies for the purpose of purchasing, owning, leasing, developing and selling real property, and be it further RESOLVED, That any one of the aforementioned persons be, and each hereby is, authorized to execute such documents as may be deemed necessary, desirable or appropriate, in such officer's judgment, in the business operation of any such partnership or limited liability company, on behalf of the Company as a partner or member, as the case may be, including, but not limited to, guaranty or loan participation agreements and loan documents for construction loans and permanent loans, provided that all loans for any one property do not exceed the sum of Fifty Million Dollars ($50,000,000) in the aggregate, and be it further RESOLVED, That any one of the aforementioned persons be, and each hereby is, authorized to guarantee in the name of and on behalf of the Company any lease or other obligation incurred in the ordinary course of business by any wholly-owned subsidiary or any other corporation or business entity in which the Company holds at least a 2o% ownership interest, whether through voting stock, or otherwise, and be it further RESOLVED, That any one of the aforementioned persons be, and each hereby is, authorized to guarantee in the name of and on behalf of the Company any obligation of any third party when such guaranty is deemed necessary or desirable in the furtherance of the Company's business interests, provided that the obligations guaranteed on behalf of such third party do not exceed the sum of Fifty Million Dollars ($50,000,000), and be it further RESOLVED, That any one of the aforementioned persons be, and each hereby is, authorized in the name of and on behalf of the Company to make a loan to any third party when such loan is deemed necessary or desirable in the furtherance of the Company's business interests, Q. 1C[D'ML"ar=\nISI "AL MAU RMLUDON (IS)DOC provided that the amount of such loan does not exceed the sum of Fifty Million Dollars ($5o,000,000). These resolutions are in substitution for similar resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors at its regular meeting on April 20, 2007. IIS WITNESS WHEREON, X have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal of said Company on the 25th day of June, 2o12. _ r— Nona M. Soltero Vice President & Assistant Secretary Q..MW,GLMa=slFM1 "AL nTATB BFSU[ JM%i (G)Doc oe P�GHAG�t� n u 02 z S 4y ENGSN�'ft- Ms. Rocale Timmons City of Renton Department of Community and Economic Development 1055 South Grady Way, 6th Floor Renton, WA 98057 CIVIL ENGNEERING..AND PLANNING. SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES May 2, 2014 COURIER DELIVERY (425) 430-7219 Re: Request for Site Plan and Minor Administrative Modifications Fred Meyer Fuel Center No. 871 — Renton Center 431 Rainier Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98059 City of Renton Land Use Permit No. LUA 12-083 City of Renton Building Permit No. 1313001726 Our Job No. 13245.1 Dear Ms. Timmons: TMS 6.51,me (2 V s ID-) t -D -/Yv ow Io1u-�- Pursuant to the discussion between City of Renton staff and the Kroger/Fred Meyer/QFC Design Team on February 6, 2013, please consider this letter as our formal request for the modifications required to fully implement the changes agreed to at the meeting as they apply to the Fred Meyer project on Rainier Avenue South. Our most recent submittal contains plans which reflect the requested changes required for the modifications; please refer to this submittal for plans confirming the modification specified below. A check in the amount of $103 is also enclosed covering administrative modification processing fees. Our response to the Service Element Modification criteria is presented in a tabular format below. The changes are presented on a number of individual plans contained in a permit resubmittal currently being routed for internal review by City of Renton staff. In the interim, should you have any questions on specific details, please advise us immediately. With a portable generator replacing the permanent generator previously required, the Fuel Center plans now reflect the portable generator being parked in the area immediately behind the kiosk. While no longer enclosed within a permanent location, this modification will allow for quicker, more immediate hook-up of a portable unit. The permanent concrete pad and enclosure have been removed from the plans and the landscaping and curb have been modified. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425j 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES ♦ OLYMPIA, WA • TEMECULA, CA ♦ WALNUT CREEK, CA www.t)arghausen.com Ms. Rocale Timmons City of Renton Department of Community and Economic Development - 2 - May 2, 2014 Controls for the portable unit will be mounted on the rear wall of the kiosk (Item No 28 on Sheet C3) enabling quick hook-up of a portable unit in the case of an extended power outage. This modification should accurately reflect the concepts discussed previously with your colleagues at our earlier meeting. Should you require any additional information, specifications, or documentation, please advise at your earliest convenience. On behalf of the Kroger/Fred Meyer/QFC Design Team, I would like to extend our thanks for the consideration provided by the City of Renton by cooperating with our team to find common ground between code requirements and design standards on one hand, and site constraints and fiscal realities on the other to produce a successful project design. Wbert y, P. McNeill Senior Planner RPM/dm 132345c.027. doc enc: As Noted cc: Mr. Timothy Hansen, Quality Food Stores, Inc_ Mr. Chris Taylor, The Kroger Co. (w/enc) Mr. Brian Peterson, The Kroger Co. Mr. James Coombes, Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. Mr. Jay S. Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mr. Jason G. Hubbell, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mr. Chris S. Ferko, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc, RECEIPT EGO0023309 City of �+ 0 Transaction Date: May 07, 2014 BILLING CONTACT Robert McNeill Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72ND AVE S KENT, WA 98032 REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME TRANSACTION PAYMENT TYPE METHOD AMOUNT PAID LUA12-095 PLAN - Modification Fee Payment heck #83043 $100.00 Technology Fee Fee Payment heck #83043 $3.00 SUB TOTAL. $103.00 TOTAL 5103.00 Pnnted On: 51712014 Prepared By: Rocale Timmons Page 1 of 1 VM kLNnoo nNp NOIN31J JO KJO "NM "B 9 30d 'N CZ dAkIt'03S 3O v/136 3H13o v/mN aHi =io NoLLHod v ),3Auns OlHdVd0OdOi AUVONnoo 666-&-MeLb HO (IN'V-LLIOA 3r1N3AV ClW&AS COSE 'ONI'smois UJALIVI (J3H-1 00-4, fi > 1 4 a fi > - 6662-ZOZZ6 LL VM'1LLNnooJNI)I NOIN3U7JO,V.IO l' Y- Q w M "3 S 30H "N £Z dM1 'gl '03S er dO 'CNV7iHOd 30 b/US 3H1 30 ViAN 3Hl 3O NOLLdod tl A3AdnS OIHdVUOOdOi 1 AUVGNnog 3nN3AV (INN a9 008£ y �>yS ONI 'S3HOlS 123A3Y4 431J3 4,71 l l 7 t. - LL Y l' Y- Q t/ er O l 7 t. s?4'.a X11 1 l � = I • ov ii 7 t/ er Jau(aWriuq m b3Irv3, NOINSH 6! v" - a2iN3o lana erg a3... All G7 W_ n S H Z 7 G Z a _ - C? a g D U ',i a ct LL s ixr - d W 0 - y �- w z yW L, ; �I 1 all. a s LU a �11 -i fad~' C n S r) L 7 G 4 _ - C? 7 1 LU LU g ',i a ct s ixr t 1 all. a s Y 2 All 41. A a C n S r) L 7 G 4 _ - C? 7 1 LU LU LU LU g ',i xmWroWmW - - ct J owpom00 .7 b s •_ ,��. : _ w U u31N3U 401N3d 69" - N3llJ3U l3fltl tl3+3YV 43dJ °°i kIll a! N' 9 a �W Aco — O 9 LO ` d317J37 NO.fl3d BSN - F131N3D 13fy N3/3YY 43. i"_. I—' rr a! O A ri Tc_ o - _ Lu a Z Jj J LU w_ Lo a ; So y%AA �- v I r z J J Li H ❑I a rr wi 3;:' ui rr a Z Cf) -- / �I kk co Fol ' �' ■ q 2'' lun ea w3a rwMEa ssrM - ,}� �3 z J J Li H ❑I a rr wi 3;:' ui rr a Z Cf) r ' �' ■ q 2'' lun ,}� z J J Li H ❑I a rr wi 3;:' ui rr a Z Cf) Y � g w LL, JDADWPDJ;j 'j 00 - 0 1 < w LL, la- z CG LU z LLJ LU g w LL, IF - 0 1 < w LL, CG LU z LLJ LU < rz 0 z g w LL, IF - 0 1 w LL, CG LU z LLJ LU < rz 0 z IF - 0 1 w LU LU < rr U) zi 0 0 J .10AOwpajq 00 BRINEO NOL43U em d O z 0 0 F- --j S.' �E L2 n-, 112� a 0 U-2 OC �E L2 n-, 112� I 1 11M1M1 `moi — — —..._ . — _ -j I.'.• �a� O V `y F13LN33 NOlN3�i �a • - H317J3J'i3fb H3A3W 43li� : .i: _ —_ — — — .. • � + ' i �/ J I N d S z - - N d - , Y L Y - U A''� ' .... 7 1 MIN30 MWEN e7N-lalW akl am a3jd .. -.. - -- ---1. I `'_- E: I I N d S - - N d - , Y L - U 7 z _ Z --: W - W I N d S d Y , L I i f f All- r E r w r - _ z /! r % t'i C0 J OL m L.L _- eau A:) 8 - SM H3W3J 13f1� kf3.LaFY a3H� � Ei1 L!i ff � C0 J OL m L.L r � Ei1 L!i ff � J OL a rr .1 A' 1 _ r - CIO' BCYW H3LW3J N0�7l3!! 6SV� - H3fN3� �3fL� N3x3v{ O3�J - .f ..-.• � . :I� a3 f� „ s 0 AIL ,. - — _ — a3 f� — 7 0 �T - U T z U, W` O - r a3 �T - T CL - z I _Lw.__-- — -,--J - - - Y a _ Z - I=, 3 n, u W - CL_ ��$ ULN3DHQll91OM-HaLWk!n'RU!9171® -.. _._ _ - a pa OZ Ul1i � - o - .- - +61,1 ❑ -+ —_ .L - m .rl W za IN I I II 77-7,7 —�'— I ! I a - a � o - .- - +61,1 ❑ -+ —_ .L - m J V Z J N Z O � � J Z I G O I.. U a Q NOi9NIHSVM 'NOlN32i H1f1dS3f1N3ANH31NIbk190ti NDJ3b0'aN'dI1210d •--^ a aas rw3wNoeir+a oH.a ups �.*�� >� �v d�� .d33� �3,� � Z X3 ` AlI�I0V3 ONnEin-i 233A3W 432!3 3f1N3AV ONZZ'3'S fl08£ " "" zere�szcszvl Y � SNOIIVA3-13 AdONVO '00 830OHN 3HlrzzY�PzcszA ZfPB6 vM 1IM :aU1 ,raj ,e. H1f�OSNZ[ 3f1N3nvOSLZ9l �7Y44� V r Ri n 0 a �o w: a� zs i 7*/� `7 z p 2 O >6> W w J - w z- 0 n C`J r c J NOIJNIHSdM'NO1N38 uiNNVe 0wI1'9MN33kin3 ]I.ti' H1f1O5 3f1N311tIti31Nlt1ii SOtr NOJ32iO 'flNb'llbOd W11Obd ONI13f13 2l3�13W 43�d 3nN3AV ❑NZZ '3'S O09E aeLs �sz cszv) Ndld 31lS C33i101O0 -00 �i3OO2JA 3H1 zzzs�sINDI x WNW H1f10S 311N3AV ONZL 54281 r` �J17 -rank CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: August 7, 2013 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Rainier LUA (file) Number: LUA-12-095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD Cross -References: AKA's: Project Manager: Rocale Timmons Acceptance Date: November 20, 2012 Applicant: James Coombs, Sr. - Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. Owner: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. Contact. Robert McNeill PID Number: 0007200209 ERC Decision Date: December 17, 2012 ERC Appeal Date: January 4, 2013 Administrative Approval: December 19, 2012 Appeal Period Ends: January 4, 2013 Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a Fred Meyer Fuel Center featuring a 6,880 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot kiosk at 439 Rainier Ave S. The project would require the installation of a 20,000 gallon underground storage for unleaded fuel, and an 18,000 gallon split underground fuel divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. Location: 439 Rainier Avenue S Comments: Denis Law City Of - Mayor i - _—� i I_ �_ rf a .14 (! May 2, 2013 Department of Community and Economic Development C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator . Robert McNeill Senior Planner Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72r'd Avenue S Kent, WA 98032 SUBJECT: Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Ranier l_UA12-095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD Dear Mr. -McNeill: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended January 4, 2013 for the Administrative Site Development Plan Review approval and Environmental (SEPA) Threshold Determination. No appeals were filed, therefore, this decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The mitigation measures, conditions of approval, and advisory notes (copy enclosed) listed in the City of Renton Report and Decision dated December 17, 2012 must be adhered to during construction and prior to final inspection. Furthermore, the Administrative Site Development Plan Review decision will expire two (2) years from the date of decision. if you are unable to finalize the development within the two-year time -frame, a single two (2) year extension may be requested in writing, pursuant to RMC 4-9-200. In regards to the vesting of the above referenced project, please be aware that as long as the development of the project conforms to the approved pians and building permits are submitted within the relevant time limits, the zoning regulations in effect at the time of the original approval shall continue to apply. However, all construction shall conform to the International Building Code and Uniform Fire Code regulations in force at the time of building permit application. If you have any questions regarding the report and decision issued for this site plan development proposal,, please call me at (425) 430-7219 Sincerely, Roc e Timmons Senior Pianner Enclosure: Copy of Mitigation Measures, Conditions of Approval, and Advisory Notes cc: James Coombes— Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. / Owner(s) Gail McLendon / Party(ies) of Record Renton.City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Wash ington 98057 . rentonwa.gov 77, `. f r w 'a `'- _ u '. _ c_ is :y ✓: =� v :% - w r -� . = v 3 011cl- CL '•1 �r _ _^--.' v •r7' - r� ._ 5U G �^-ni y',7 R'^ j ,r. C J .- 'f, L u 25 c�•�� sc iso bq y z rT S .. o rl} Jp za ;To 3 z 0-4 N s .r-1 F aJQ bq 25 c�•�� sc iso .; S .. o rl} 3 : C. -r- bre N s .r-1 F bq A CL N C) Q � :/; G.,•'�^.. �s¢= •MSI .-. s �l ops ~ In.ter- cr CD -0 HcaCU two DUB, -C� O V "p y s 3+ s~ f -o o00L "w AIr.°ter. ; ms "A r., Ciry of, NOTIL,CE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION 155UANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED {DNS-Mj PD5TEP 10 1 INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: ;red Meyer Fueling Station on Rainlar PROJECT NUMBER: LUA12-WS, ECF, SA -A, MoD, MDn LOCATION: 439 Hairier Avenue 5 DESCRI"ON: The applicant has requested SEPA 1:nvhonmentaf Review and Site Pian Rerlew for theconstruction of a Fred Meyer F,AIr, Canter featuring , 18 -fuel pumps, a 8,880 square loot canopy and a 180 :quare fool k1nsE at 439 Ralnl[r Ave 5. The project wou]d require the instaRatlon of a 20,000 gallon underground storage for unleaded 1w1, and an 1R,000 gallon split undell curd fuel divided Between diesel and supremo unleaded fief. An approll—te 1.13 acre mmmerdal pad, of the larger 4.27 acre site, would be used to the she the pro posed fueling denter. Thct Tire exit x0,948 squarefoot struure, lormsey occupied by elxkducler and Toreros B proposed for demolition, The site is located in the commercial Arterial ICA) zoning ciasstflcatlon and within Des IM Dlstnct'D.. Access would --nue to be gamed From Ralnler Ave S. The applicant is requesting two modlFlradons In enminate the retux and reryrequirement quirement and to repute stacking capadty for she vehlde st.ckl,g lanes. Thera ere no aHlral areas —Iter THE CITY OF RLN70N ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HA5 DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determinat4en must be filed In writing on or before 5:DO p.m. un January 4, 2013, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1(155 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of RMC 4-&110 and Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the penton city CIeTi Office, (425) 430-5510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION 15 APPEALED, A PUSLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425j 430-7200, DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. CERTIFICATION hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted in conspicuous places or nearby the described property on Date: Signed; " STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that {- c�"rlr_ {YC 1 signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated:c( 1 ��.►�' R ++rte Notary Public in an for the State of Washington �� `�yRA1MN1ptfFfgfg / E - ipyB Ed ++rt�O ,i Notary (Print): ai 'z� *O o;- =My appointment expires: A ,��/ riffEgt�ux��t•"�Ak `/+illi 9TATF— 0 ``�`` i'1 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 19th day of December, 2012, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Agencies See Attached Robert McNeill Contact James Coombes - Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. Owner Gail McLendon Party of Record (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON ) = P, " ry SS 0 COUNTY OF KING f I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker ,rrrrrf�l''�u,a„2�*sV�,' signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary *W purposes mentioned in the instrument. �tttttt�����`` Dated: Notary Pubic in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print): FJ_ ,Q- , c,L-y- My appointment expires:C-5 Project Name: Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Rainier Project Number: LUA12-095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD template - affidavit of service by mailing kILING Dept. of Ecology ** WDFW - Larry Fisher* Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. Environmental Review Section 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 Issaquah, WA 98027 39015-172 rd Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region * Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert King Area Dev, Serv,, MS -240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172"d Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers * KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Gretchen Kaehler Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin PO Box 48343 PO Box C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Boyd Powers * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Steve Roberge Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Jae Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. **Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov template - affidavit of service by mailing _00 CityOf `Y r �. OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS -M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Rainier PROJECT NUMBER: LUA12-095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD LOCATION: 439 Rainier Avenue S DESCRIPTION: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a Fred Meyer Fueling Center featuring , 18 -fuel pumps, a 6,860 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot kiosk at 439 Rainier Ave S. The project would require the installation of a 20,000 gallon underground storage for unleaded fuel, and an 18,000 gallon split underground fuel divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. An approximate 1.13 acre commercial pad, of the larger 4.27 acre site, would be used to the site the proposed fueling center. The existing 10,948 square foot structure, formerly occupied by Blockbuster and Toreros is proposed for demolition. The site is located in the Commercfaf Arterial (CA) zoning classification and within Design District 'D'. Access would continue to be gained from Rainier Ave S. The applicant is requesting two modifications in eliminate the refuse and recyclable requirement and to reduce stacking capacity for the vehicle stacking lanes. There are no critical areas on site. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERM{NED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE FNViRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on January 4, 2013, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. Denis Law - Mayor � City O December 19, 2012 Department of Community and Economic Development C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Robert McNeill Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 1821572 nd Avenue S Kent, WA 98032 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Rainier, LUA12--095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD Dear Mr. McNeill: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a threshold Determination of Non -Significance -Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report, for a list of the Mitigation Measures. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on January 4, 2013, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. If you have any further questions, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Rocal Timmon Ass ciate Planner Enclosure cc: James Coomber - Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. / Owner(s) Gail McLendon / Party(ies) of Record Renton City Hall . 1055 South Grady Way . Renton, Washington 98057 . rentonwa.gov Denis Law Mayor December 19, 2012 Washington State Department of Ecology City of" - Department of Community and Economic Development C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on December 17, 2012: SEPA DETERMINATION: Determination of Non -Significance Mitigated (DNSM) PROJECT NAME: Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Rainier PROJECT NUMBER: LUA12-095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on January 4, 2013, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Roc le Timmons Associate Planner Enclosure cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, NW Region Boyd Powers, Department of Natural Resources Larry Fisher, WDFW Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Duwamish Tribal Office Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program US Army Corp. of Engineers Gretchen Kaehler, office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Renton City Hall . 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY c<<}'Or AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNSM) MITIGATION MEASURES AND ADVISORY NOTES PROJECT NUMBER: LUA12-095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD APPLICANT: James Coombes, Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Rainier PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a Fred Meyer Fuel Center featuring a 6,880 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot kiosk, and two modifications in order to increase the maximum front yard setback and to reduce stacking capacity for the vehicle stacking lanes. PROJECT LOCATION: 439 Rainier Avenue S LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. All earthwork performed, implemented by the applicant, shall be consistent with the recommendations of the geotechnical report, prepared by The Riley Group, dated June 5, 2012. ADIVISORY NOTES: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 3. Commercial, multi -family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 4. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to final occupancy permits Westar• 1. The preliminary fire flow requirement is 1,500 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 -feet of the proposed building, and a second hydrant is required within 300 -feet. Existing hydrants may be counted toward the requirement as long as they meet current code, including 5 -inch storz fittings. 2. The proposed gas station would need to install a minimum 1" water meter with a RP in a "Hot Box". 3. The existing water meter needs to be cut, capped, and abandoned at the time of demolition. 4. System Development Charges are per dwelling unit and are based on the total number and size of any and all water meters. The Development Charges are collected as part of the construction permit. Sewer. 1. The development's design needs to include what will be done with the pipe that runs east - west on the north side of the restaurant building, whether it will remain in use or be removed. 2. A commercial building permit will trigger a separate review. 3. Separate drains for the concrete islands are required to be connected to an oil water separator downstream, in a vault in a positive direction. A shut off valve is required to be installed. 4. Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges are based on the size of the domestic water meter. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. 5. Note: The City has plans (within the next couple of years) for replacing the existing 8" private sanitary sewer along the westerly property line and making it public. The City will want to work with the applicant to coordinate future replacement Surface Water: ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 2 of 4 1. The conceptual drainage plan and report, which was submitted with the formal application, states the project will comply with the City of Renton Amendments to the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). 2. The conceptual drainage plan and report shows that a Filterra Water Quality system is proposed. 3. Applicant is advised that the Filterra system has not been included in the KCSWDM or the DOE manual as an approved water quality treatment facility. The City only allows the use of the Filterra systems through an adjustment process. Applicant is encouraged to use one of the facilities listed in the KCSWDM. 4. The Surface Water SDC fees are $0.405 per square foot of new impervious area. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. Transportation; 1. Additional offsite improvements are not required, as the City is installing improvements along Rainier Ave S. 2. Per City of Renton code, property corners at intersections in commercial blocks shall have a minimum radius of 25 feet at all lot corners at intersections of dedicated public rights-of- way, if not existing. 3. A Traffic Study was submitted with the formal application. 4. Project is subject to impact fee. The net fee per adopted impact fee is $70,329.34. Fire: 1. The preliminary fire flow requirement is 1,500 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 -feet of the proposed building and one hydrant is required within 300 -feet. Existing hydrants can be counted toward the requirement as long as they meet current code, including 5 -inch storz fittings. It appears adequate fire flow and fire hydrants exist in this area. 2. The fire mitigation impact fees are currently applicable at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of building area. Fees are not charged for canopy structures. Credit would be granted for the existing building to be removed, so no new fees would apply as the old building is bigger than the one proposed. 3. Separate plans and permits are required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for review and permitting of all underground fuel tanks and tank monitoring systems. 4. All new commercial fuel dispensing facilities shall be provided with an approved on site standby power system to facilitate fuel dispensing during local power outages or disaster. S. Fire department apparatus access is adequate. 6. An electronic site plan is required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for pre -fire planning purposes prior to occupancy of the building. ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 3 of 4 General: All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two horizontal and vertical controls per the City's current horizontal and vertical control network. ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 4 of 4 .;, _. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY t '�`: t�l city of a O �, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS -M) PROJECT NUMBER: LUA12-095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD APPLICANT: John Coombes, Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Rainier PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a Fred Meyer Fuel Center featuring a 6,880 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot kiosk, and two modifications in order to increase the maximum front yard setback and to reduce stacking capacity for the vehicle stacking lanes. PROJECT LOCATION: 439 Rainier Avenue 5 LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-9-070D Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on January 4, 2013. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with. Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: I L-14 Gregg Zim e ma ,Administrator Public Work Department Terry Higashiyama, Administra or Community Services Department December 21, 2012 December 17, 2012 Mark Peterso , Administrator Date Fire & Emergency Services Date 1l 7(l \z C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator Date Department of Community & Date Economic Development DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY 077ty0f AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA TO: Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator Mark Peterson, Fire & Emergency Services Administrator C.E. "Chip" Vincent, CED Administrator FROM: Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager MEETING DATE: Monday, December 17, 2012 TIME: 3:00 p.m. LOCATION: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Jossen Short Plat (Dolbee) L UA12-045, ECF, SHPL-A Location: 1719 Morris Avenue S. Description: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review and Short Plat approval for the subdivision of a 27,035 square foot lot into three lots resulting in a density of 4.9 units per acre. The subject site is located at 1719 Morris Avenue South and is zoned Residential 8 (R-8) units per net acre. The site currently contains a single family home an accessory dwelling unit and a detached garage. The existing home and accessory dwelling unit is proposed to be maintained on future Lot 2. CONSENT ITEM: Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Rainier (Timmons) LUA12-095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD Location: 439 5 Rainier Avenue S. Description: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a Fred Meyer Fuel Center featuring a 6,880 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot kiosk, and two modifications in order to increase the maximum front yard setback and to reduce stacking capacity for the vehicle stacking lanes. cc: D. Law, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer S. Dale Estey, CED Director I D. Jacobson, Deputy PW Administrator - Transportation N. Watts, Development Services Director L. Warren, City Attorney Phil Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner D. Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshal'5 J. Medzegian, Council DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY City of; i AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT AND ADMINISTRATIVE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REPORT & DECISION ERC MEETING DATE: December 17, 2012 Project Name: Fred Meyer Fueling Center #459 / Renton Center Owner/Applicant: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.; John Coombes; 3800 SE 22nd Ave; Portland, OR 97202 Contact: Barghausen; Robert McNeil; 18215 72nd Ave S; Kent, WA 98032 File Number. LUA12-095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD Project Manager. Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner Project Summary: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a Fred Meyer Fueling Center featuring, 18 -fuel pumps, a 6,880 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot kiosk at 439 Rainier Ave S. The project would require the installation of a 20,000 gallon underground storage for unleaded fuel, and an 18,000 gallon split underground fuel divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. An approximate 1.13 acre commercial pad, of the larger 4.27 acre site, would be used to site the proposed fueling center. The existing 10,948 square foot structure, formerly occupied by Blockbuster and Toreros is proposed for demolition. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning classification and within Design District V. Access would continue to be gained from Rainier Ave S. The applicant is requesting two modifications to eliminate the refuse and recyclable requirement and to reduce stacking capacity for the vehicle stacking lanes. There are no critical areas on site. Project location: 439 S Rainier Ave S Site Area: 49,223 SF STAFF Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a RECOMMENDATION: Determination of Non -Significance (DNS -M). Project Location Map ERC and Site Plan Report. docx City of Renton Deportment of Community_ __onomic Development Environmental Re Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER / RENTON CENTER LUA12-095, SA -A, ECF, MOD Report of December 17, 2012 Page 2 of 26 A. EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1: Fred Meyer Fueling Center/ Renton Center ERC/Site Plan Report and Decision Exhibit 2: Site Plan Exhibit 3: Landscape Plan Exhibit 4: Elevations Exhibit 5: Traffic Report prepared by Group MacKenzie, dated May 24, 2012 Exhibit 6: Environmental "SEPA" Determination Exhibit 7: Drainage Report prepared by Barghausen, dated October 12, 2012 Exhibit 8: Geotechnical Report prepared by the Riley Group, Inc., dated June 5, 2012 Exhibit 9 Aerial Photograph B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner(s) of Record: 2. Zoning Designation: 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: John Coombes Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. 3800 SE 22nd Ave Portland, OR 97202 Commercial Arterial (CA) Commercial Corridor (CC) 10,948 square foot structure, formerly occupied by Blockbuster and Toreros proposed for demolition 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: a. North: Mixed Retail (CA zone) b. East: McClendon's Hardware (CA zone) c. South: Starbucks & Qdobo (CA zone) d. West: Fred Meyer (CA zone) 6. Site Area: 1.13 acres C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Comprehensive Plan N/A 5099 11/01/2004 Zoning N/A 5100 11/01/2004 Annexation N/A 1745 09/18/1945 Renton Center Expansion LUA93-151 N/A 06/06/1994 ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community nomic Development Environmental Re ' Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER / REN CENTER LUA12-095, SA -A, ECF, MOD Report of December 17, 2012 T� Page 3 of 26 D. PUBLICSERVICES: 1. Existing Utilities a_ Water. This project is served by the City of Renton. It is in the 196 Water Pressure Zone. The static water pressure at the street level is approximately 75 psi. There is an existing eight -inch DI water main located on the site. b. Sewer: There is an existing eight -inch sanitary sewer main located on site. c. Surface ]Storm Water: There are storm drainage facilities in Rainier Ave S and onsite. 2. Streets: There is sidewalk, curb, gutter, and street lighting fronting the site. 3. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department E APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE. 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts a. Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts b. Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table c. Section 4-2-120: Development Standards for Commercial Zoning Classifications 2. Chapter 3 Land Use Districts a. Section 4-3-050: Critical Area Regulations b. Section 4-3-100: Urban Design Regulations 3. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards 4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards a. Section 4-6-060: Street Standards 5. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria a. Section 4-9-200: Site Plan Review 6. Chapter 11 Definitions G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element 2. Community Design Element H. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.210.240, the following environmental (SFPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Environmental Threshold Determination Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS -M with a 14 -day Appeal Period. ERC/Site Plon Report City of Renton Department of Community nomic Development Environmentol R Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER/ RENTON CENTER LUA12-095, SA -A, ECF, MOD Report of December 17, 2012 Page 4 of 26 2. Mitigation Measures 1. All earthwork performed, implemented by the applicant, shall be consistent with the recommendations of the geotechnical report, prepared by The Riley Group, dated June S, 2012. 3. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: a. Earth Impacts: The site is nearly level with an elevation difference of less than three feet. Following development, impervious surface coverage will be approximately 86 percent which is a reduction from the existing 88.5 percent impervious cover. The applicant is proposing the excavation of approximately 4,800 cubic yards of on-site material, primarily for the underground fuel storage tanks. Exposed cover during construction would leave soils susceptible to erosion. The applicant will be required to design a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) pursuant to the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements. The applicant provided a Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by the Riley Group, Inc., dated June 5, 2012 (Exhibit 8). The Engineer visited the site and drilled two test borings to a maximum depth of 26.5 feet below the ground surface. The result of the two borings identified that the site is underlain by 3 feet of fill over native soil. Based on the depth of a concrete obstruction encountered, in three locations on site, it is likely that a concrete slab is located under a larger portion of the proposed canopy area. The native soils include five feet of very soft to soft sandy silt over five to ten feet of loose silty sand over medium dense to dense sand with gravel_ The report stated that the groundwater table was encountered during the field exploration; at nine to ten feet and wet soil layers and seepage were encountered as shallow as five feet. Fluctuations in groundwater level should be expected on a seasonal and annual basis. The report includes recommendations for site preparation and grading, structural fill, excavations and shoring, underground storage tanks, foundations, kiosk slab -on -grade, drainage, utilities, and pavements. Therefore, staff recommends as a mitigation measure that the applicant comply with the recommendations included in the provided Geotechnical Engineering Report. Mitigation Measures: All earthwork performed, implemented by the applicant, shall be consistent with the recommendations of the geotechnical report, prepared by The Riley Group, dated June 5, 2012. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations b. Air Impacts: It is not anticipated that the project would significantly impact air quality. Any impacts would be from construction and future operations, including customer traffic. Air impacts from construction would be temporary and would be limited in duration. The applicant has indicated that construction vehicle emission would be controlled through the use of factory -installed mufflers and spark arrestors, reducing the amount of noxious emissions and noise and helping to control airborne dispersal. Furthermore, the Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (TESCP) would further reduce airborne particulates related to dust by controlled watering of the grounds during construction. Project Location Map ERC and Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community nomic Development Environmentol Re ' Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER / REN CENTER LUA12-095, SA -A, ECF, MOD Report of December 17, 2012 Page 5 of 26 Following construction, the operation of the fuel center would result in such emissions as carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOXs), sulfur oxides (SOXs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), hydrocarbons, and related airborne pollutants typically associated with the use of fossil fuels. The applicant has indicated that impacts to air pollutions would be minimized by installing vapor recovery systems in all stages of fuel distribution process. The dual -point systems would be used to reduce vapor release/emissions during deliveries and at the dispensers. These systems would reduce and/or recover vapors. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended. Nexus: Not applicable. c. Storm Water Impacts: Runoff from the site is collected in existing catch basins onsite. Runoff flows north and west through the Fred Meyer site_ The flow then continues west in underground conveyance pipes to Hardie Ave SW where an arch pipe collects the flow and it is conveyed south. A preliminary drainage plan and drainage report has been submitted with the site plan application, prepared by Barghausen, dated October 12, 2012 (Exhibit 7). The report addresses compliance with the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and the 2009 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWM, Chapters 1 and 2. The conceptual drainage plan and report shows that a Filterra Water Quality system is proposed. Applicant is advised that the Filterra system has not been included in the KCSWM or the DOE manual as an approved water quality treatment facility. The City only allows the use of the Filterra systems through an adjustment process. Staff has not supported requests to use these types of facilities in the past. Plans will be reviewed in detail prior to issuance of a construction permit, following the land use process. The applicant has also indicated that stormwater runoff from the concrete drive pad under the proposed canopy could be contaminated with oil, unspent hydrocarbons and other contaminants. Stormwater runoff from the concrete drive slab/pad located beneath the fuel canopy would be collected and subsequently conveyed through an oil/water separator, and then discharged into the sanitary sewer system instead of the storm system. This would reduce potential pollutants from entering the storm system_ Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended. Nexus: Not applicable. d. Transportation Impacts: The site has one public street frontage, Rainier Ave S (Principal Arterial). Access is proposed from an existing curb cut along Rainier Ave S. A secondary access would be provided via the Fred Meyer parking lot. The applicant provided a Traffic Impact Analysis, as part of the site plan application, prepared by Group MacKenzie, dated May 24, 2012 (Exhibit 5). The study states that the stacking of vehicles for the proposed facility, with 18 fueling positions, would unlikely back up onto Rainier Ave S. Also based on the provided study the project would generate 21 new weekday daily trips. The study utilized reductions for internal capture trips (95 trips), pass -by trips (81 trips), and diverted trips (53 trips) in order to arrive at the final number of trips. The study also calculates the trip generation for the existing use at 36 primary trips. While it appears, based on the study provided, there are no additional trips proposed the City's Transportation Impact Fee is based on the number of pumps proposed for gas stations. In order to mitigate transportation impact the applicant would be required to pay an appropriate Transportation Impact Fee. Currently this fee is assessed at $12,642.00 per pump. However, the fee will change to $7,777.11 on January 1, 2013. Therefore the fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of payment, shall be payable to the City at the time of Building Permit issuance. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation. Nexus: Not applicable. ERC/Site Plon Report City of Renton Department of Community � omi[ Development Environmental Re - Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER / REN' CENTER _ LUA12-095, SA -A, ECF, MOD Report of December 17, 2012 Page 6 of 26 4. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant." 1. ADMINSTRATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW FINDINGS OF FACT. 1. The applicant, Fred Meyer Stores, is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental `SEPA' Review for the construction of a 6,880 square foot canopy, a 160 square foot kiosk, and associated improvements. 2. The proposed fuel facility would replace an existing retail building formerly occupied by Blockbuster Video and Terero's restaurant. 3. The existing 10,948 square foot structure would be demolished prior to construction. 4. A total of 76 existing parking stalls would be removed as part of the proposal - 5. The proposed canopy would be 19 feet tall, with a mansard roof projecting above the 19 feet. The kiosk would be 11 feet tall. 6. Proposed parking is in the form of stacking for the fuel pumps. There are 1,314 parking stalls adjacent to the site which would be accessible to the Fred Meyer Fueling facility employees_ 7. The applicant is requesting a parking modification in order to provide stacking for 36 vehicles instead of the required 90. 8. The Planning Division of the City of Renton accepted the above master application for review on November 1, 2012 and determined it complete on November 20, 2012. The project complies with the 120 -day review period. 9. The property is located within the Commercial Corridor (CC) Comprehensive Plan land use designation and the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning classification. 10. Access to the site would be provided via an existing curb cut along Rainier Ave S for the primary access. Secondary access would be provided through the exisitng Fred Meyer parking lot. 11. The site is nearly level with a change in elevation that is less than three feet. 12. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended), on December 17, 2012, the City's Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non - Significance - Mitigated (DNS -M) (Exhibit 6). A 14 -day appeal period will commence with this Administrative Site Plan Review Decision on December 21, 2012 and end on January 4, 2013. 13. Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments have been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and.the Departmental Recommendation at the end of this report. ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community nomic Development Environmental R ' Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER / REN CENTER LUA12-095, 5A -A, ECF, MOD Report of December 17, 2012 Page 7 of 26 14. The proposal requires Site Plan Review. The following table contains project elements intended to comply with Site Plan Review decision criteria, as outlined in RMC 4-9-200.E: a-OMPIREHENSEVE PLAN CbMPLIANCE AND CONSISTENCY Tl esrte �s desrgnated5 Carnmerciaj Corridor (CC) an the Cornprehensi4e Plan hand Usk Map The urposE . of:CC as to evolve froii'�`strip cornmeraal" linear business d�stritts fn btasjness areas ciaradtenzed l�yF enhanced si#e pianning incorporating efficient lot de$ign�`coardtnazed access, arrteiities, and parking bo.ulevarci #reatmen# The proposal >is compllan# wrth the following Compre ensrve'Plan paUcres << -, Objective LU -AAA: Create opportunities for intensive office uses in portions of Commercial ✓ Corridor designations including a wide range of business, financial, and professional services supported by service and commercial/retail activities. Policy LU -262. Support the redevelopment of commercial business districts located along principal arterials in the City. Policy LU -264. New development in Commercial Corridor designated areas should be encouraged to implement uniform site standards, including: 1) Parking preferably at the rear of the building, or on the side as a second choice; ✓ 2) Setbacks that would allow incorporating a landscape buffer; Front setback without frontage street or driveway between building and sidewalk; and 3) Common signage and lighting system. Policy LU -266. Development within defined activity nodes should be subject to additional ✓ design guidelines as delineated in the development standards. Policy LU -268. Public amenity features (e.g. plazas, recreation areas) should be encouraged as part of new development or redevelopment. b ZONING CQMPLIANCE_' 'D"�CONSIISTdIIC f Ttie sub�ec# site Js classified Commercial Arterial (CA) on' -the Gty of Rentor} Zoning Map The following' developmen#s#andard5 are applicable to the proposal 4 = f 4 xt Density: Per RMC 4-2-120A the allowed density range in the CA zoning classification is a minimum of 20 dwelling units per net acre (du/ac) up to a maximum of 60 dufac_ Net density is calculated after public rights-of-way, private access easements, and critical areas are deducted from the gross acreage of the site. Not applicable. Lot Dimensions: Per RMC4-2-120A the minimum lot size, in the CA zone, is 5,000 square feet. Not applicable. Setbacks: Per RMC 4-2-120A the CA zoning classification requires a minimum front yard setback of 10 feet which may be reduced to zero feet during the site plan development review process, provided blank walls ore not located within the reduced setback. There is a maximum front yard setback of 15 feet. The CA zone has no rear or side yard setback except 15 feet if lot abuts or is adjacent to a residential zone. The following table contains setbacks for the proposed structures: East Front Yard Setback South Side Yard Setback North Side Yard Setback West Rear Yard Setback 70 feet _ 32 feet 33 feet N/A ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Cammunity nomic Development Environmental Re ' Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report FRET] MEYER FUEL CENTER/ REN CENTER LUA12-095, SA -A, EGF, MOD Report of December 17, 2012 � Page 8 of 26 The proposed structure exceeds the maximum 15 -foot front yard setback. RMC 4-2-120C states that the maximum front yard setback may be modified by the Reviewing Official through the site development plan review process if the applicant can demonstrate that the site development plan meets the following criteria: a. Orients development to the pedestrian through such measures as providing pedestrian walkways beyond those required by the Renton Municipal Code (RMC), encouraging pedestrian amenities and supporting alternatives to single occupant vehicle (SOV) transportation, and b. Creates a low scale streetscape through such measures as fostering distinctive architecture and mitigating the visual dominance of extensive and unbroken parking along the street front; and c. Promotes safety and visibility through such measures as discouraging the creation of hidden spaces, minimizing conflict between pedestrian and traffic and ensuring adequate setbacks to accommodate required parking and/or access that could not be provided otherwise. The applicant has indicated that the projects operational requirements mandate a greater separation from the property line than specified by code. Physically placing the fuel canopy in a location which complied with the required maximum setback would virtually eliminate the possibility of vehicle queuing/stacking and eliminate any operational functionality for the proposed use. The locations would minimize conflict between pedestrians and traffic and would preserve public health, safety and welfare by providing needed separation. Therefore, staff supports a modification to the maximum front yard setback. Building Height: Per RMC 4-2-120A building height is restricted to 50 feet unless a conditional use permit is obtained. The height of the proposed structure would be 19 feet with a mansard roof element atop (Exhibit 4). The proposal complies with the height requirements of the zone. Building Standards: Per RMC 4-2-120A the allowed lot coverage is 65 percent for proposals within the CA classification. The proposed building would have a footprint of 7,000 square feet on the 49,233 square foot commercial building pad resulting in a building lot coverage of approximately 14 percent. Landscaping: Per RMC 4-4-070 ten feet of on-site landscaping is required along all public street frontages, with the exception of areas for required walkways and driveways or those projects with reduced setbacks. A conceptual landscape plan was submitted with the project application (Exhibit 3).The applicant is proposing a 14 -foot onsite landscape strip along Rainier Ave S which widens to approximately 15 feet at the northeast and southeast corners of the site. The landscape plan includes a planting plan; the proposed tree species largely consists of sawtooth zelkova, western redbud and bowhall red maple trees. The shrubs proposed largely consist of: barberry, dwarf redtwig dogwood, bell heather, and laurel. The applicant will be required to submit a final landscape plan, for review and approval by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to construction permit issuance. Refuse and Recyclables: Per RMC 4-4-090 for retail uses require a minimum of 5 square feet per ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community tomic Development Environmental Re " Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER / REN CENTER LUA12-095, SA -A, ECF, MOD Report of December 17, 2012 Page 9 of 26 every 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area shall be provided far recyclable deposit areas and a minimum of 10 square feet per .1,000 square feet of building gross floor area shall be provided for refuse deposit areas with a total minimum area of 100 square feet. Based on the proposal for a total of 160 square foot kiosk or retail establishment space; a minimum area of 100 square feet of refuse and recycle area would be required_ The applicant submitted a modification request in order to eliminate the refuse and recyclable requirement. The applicant states that on other sites where the fuel facility is adjacent to the Fred Meyer retail store, the fuel facility shares the larger refuse and recycling facilities for the retail store. The shared use would maximize maneuvering area within the fuel facility and eliminate additional truck traffic. The applicant states that refuse and recyclables are picked up daily or more as needed. Due to the size of the use and the ability to share the 300 square foot Fred Meyer refuse and recyclable facility staff supports the modification to eliminate the required refuse and recyclable enclosure on site. Vehicles: Per RMC4-2-120 a connection shall be provided for site -to -site vehicle access ways, where topographically feasible, to allow a smooth flow of traffic across abutting CA parcels without the need to use a street. Access may comprise the aisle between rows of parking stalls but is not allowed between a building and a public street. This section of code is intended to provide vehicular connections to abutting commercial uses. The proposal is bordered by right-of-way to the north and the primary Fred Meyer access to the west. To the south is an established commercial use which would preclude a vehicular connection. Critical Areas: Not applicable. Parking: Drive-through facilities shall be so located that sufficient on-site vehicle stacking space is provided for the handling of motor vehicles using such facility during peak business hours. Typically 5 stacking spaces per window are required unless otherwise determined by the Planning Director. Stacking spaces cannot obstruct required parking spaces or ingress/egress within the site or extend into the public right -of --way. One parking space would be required for the cashier's kiosk. The applicant is not proposing any parking stalls on the commercial building pad. However, as part of the larger Fred Meyer shopping center there are 1,314 parking stalls provided on site. The applicant has requested a modification from the stacking standards of 5 spaces per vehicle fueling positions. Based on the minimum standards the 18 fueling positions require 5 cars stacking. This would result in a total of 90 car stacking spaces. The applicant has requested to provide room for 38 car stacking spaces. The applicant submitted a modification request which was supported by a Transportation Analysis prepared by Group MacKenzie. The applicant contends that they considered multiple layouts, pump configurations, spacing/layout options and their impacts on queuing/stacking. The most effective option is provided in the submitted plans. The proposal would provide ten stacking lanes serving 18 available vehicle fueling pumps (VFP) but would also maintain passing lanes, beneath the fuel canopy and on the outer edge of the canopy. The applicant has indicated that the proposed design allows drivers to maneuver to take advantage of an unused VFP, and maintain the maximum number of VFPs available. Furthermore, the applicant has indicated the combination of more refueling options and easier accessibility lending to decrease dwell time would equate to less of a chance of a queuing/stacking problem developing. The Transportation Analysis concluded that the proposed on-site queuing area is sufficient to accommodate the expected demand. Staff supports a modification to the stacking as proposed. ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community omit Development Environmentaf Re ' Committee & Administrative Site Pian Report FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER/ REN CENTER LUA12-095, SA -A, ECF, MOD Report of December 17, 2012 _ Page 10 of 26 Sidewalks, pathways, and Pedestrian Easements: The applicant has proposed to provide sidewalks along the street frontage which would allow for pedestrian circulation around the site. However, the fuel station is an auto oriented use which continuously contains maneuvering vehicles. As such pedestrians are discouraged from walking though the site unless utilizing the facility. Therefore, the proposed sidewalks along the frontage would meet the intent of pedestrian pathways and at the same time would provide for safe pedestrian circulation around the site. Additionally the applicant has proposed a total of 761 square feet of public plaza space along Rainier Ave S which is connected to the public sidewalk. c DESIGN REGi;ICATIDN COMPIWIyCEAND CONiSTENCY;` FThersite,ls located w t lft'iDeslgri fltstrrct 'D' r R Ta that btiildJag.s i#oc. n burlilrngs that the City; ensure ,are relation s streets nd nthe s� n of e of Renton can be realized f k a hagh . ensttX ur an-,rrwrgnmenr; sa that�iusllre.Sses enjoy v�siihlJrt frorn'. ... arc.` r r -M -� - L Win, pu6lrc rrgFits of wiry and to nrourage pr°destnan adrvity. t Etre drstnct x� As demonstrated rn : �thraughar the table beiow;the pri �posal � 0, . etre rr teni* flf tf � eslgn Regulatrans:an tyre basis f"rndrvrdua! ment rIRAf u11 corrdrtibns ofappravol arern;F 4:SITEDESiGNAND BUILDING LOC4TiON::_, intent . To ensure that buildings are locbted in relation to`streets`and ofher: buildings so that the Vision `of the City of Renton can be realized for high dens ty urban.envirogmeq so that busine'sses`enjoy visibr(ity from public righ#s=6f-ways .and to encourage pedestrian activity.., 1. Building Location and Orientation: Intent: To ensure visibility of businesses and to establish active, lively uses along sidewalks and pedestrian pathways. To organize buildings for pedestrian use and so that natural light is available to other structures and open space. To ensure an appropriate transition between buildings, parking areas, and other land uses, and increase privacy for residential uses. Guidelines: Developments shall enhance the mutual relationship of buildings with each other, as well as with the roads, open space, and pedestrian amenities while working to create a pedestrian oriented environment. Lots shall be configured to encourage variety and so that natural light is available to buildings and open space. The privacy of individuals in residential uses shall be provided for. Standard: The availability of natural light (both direct and reflected) and direct sun exposure to nearby buildings and open space (except parking areas) shall be considered when siting structures. NSA Standard: Buildings shall be oriented to the street with clear connections to the sidewalk_ Standard: Buildings with residential uses located at the street level shall be set back from the NSA sidewalk a minimum of ten feet (10) and feature substantial landscaping between the sidewalk and the building or have the ground floor residential uses raised above street level for residents privacy. 2, Building Entries: Intent: To make building entrances convenient to locate and easy to access, and ensure that building entries further the pedestrian nature of the fronting sidewalk and the urban character of the district. Guidelines: Primary entries shall face the street, serve as a focal point, and allow space for social interaction. All entries shall include features that make them easily identifiable while reflecting the architectural character of the building. The primary entry shall be the most visually prominent entry. Pedestrian access to the building from the sidewalk, parking lots, and/or other areas shall be provided and shall enhance the overall quality of the pedestrian experience on the site. Standard: A primary entrance of each building shall be located on the facade facing a street, N/A shall be prominent visible from the street, connected by a walkway to the public sidewalk, and include human -scale elements. _ Standard A primary entrance of each building shall be made visibly prominent by NSA incorporating architectural features such as a facade overhang, trellis, large entry doors, and/or ornamental lighting. ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community nomic Development Environmental fie ' Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER/ REN CENTER LUA12-095, SA -A, ECF, MOD Report of December 17, 2012 Page 11 of 26 N/A Standard Building entries from a street shall be clearly marked with canopies, architectural elements, ornamental lighting, or landscaping and include weather protection at least four and one-half feet (4-1/2') wide (illustration below). Buildings that are taller than thirty feet IN (30) in height shall also ensure that the weather protection is proportional to the distance above ground level. /A Standard. Building entries from a parking lot shall be subordinate to those related to the street. N/A Standard: Features such as entries, lobbies, and display windows shall be oriented to a street or pedestrian -oriented space, otherwise, screening or decorative features should be incorporated. Standard. Multiple buildings on the same site shall direct views to building entries by N/A providing a continuous network of pedestrian paths and open spaces that incorporate landscaping. Standard: Ground floor residential units that are directly accessible from the street shall N/A include entries from front yards to provide transition space from the street or entries from an open space such as a courtyard or garden that is accessible from the street. 3. Transition to Surrounding Development: Intent: To shape redevelopment projects so that the character and value of Renton's long-established, existing neighborhoods are preserved. Guidelines: Careful siting and design treatment shall be used to achieve a compatible transition where new buildings differ from surrounding development in terms of building height, bulk and scale. Standard: At least one of the following design elements shall be considered to promote a transition to surrounding uses: (a) Building proportions, including step -backs on upper levels; (b) Building articulation to divide a larger architectural element into smaller increments, or '/ (c) Roof lines, roof pitches, and roof shapes designed to reduce apparent bulk and transition with existing development_ Additionally, the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee may require increased setbacks at the side or rear of a building in order to reduce the bulk and scale of larger buildings and/or so that sunlight reaches adjacent and/or abutting yards. 4. Service Element Location and Design: intent: To reduce the potential negative impacts of service elements (i.e., waste receptacles, loading docks) by locating service and loading areas away from high-volume pedestrian areas, and screening them from view in high visibility areas. Guidelines: Service elements shall be concentrated and located so that impacts to pedestrians and other abutting uses are minimized. The impacts of service elements shall be mitigated with landscaping and an enclosure with fencing that is made of quality materials. Standard. Service elements shall be located and designed to minimize the impacts on the N/A pedestrian environment and adjacent uses. Service elements shall be concentrated and located where they are accessible to service vehicles and convenient for tenant use. Standard: In addition to standard enclosure requirements, garbage, recycling collection, and N/A utility areas shall be enclosed on all sides, including the roof and screened around their perimeter by a wall or fence and have self-closing doors. N/A Standard: Service enclosures shall be made of masonry, ornamental metal or wood, or some combination of the three (3). N/A Standard: if the service area is adjacent to a street pathway, or pedestrian -oriented space, a landscaped planting strip, minimum 3 feet wide, shall be located on 3 sides of such facility. S. Gateways: ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community nomic Development Environmental Re Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER / REN CENTER LUA12-095, SA -A, ECF, MOD Report of December 17, 2012 Page 12 of 26 Not Applicable It. PARKING AND VEHICULAR ACCESS: intent: Toprovide.:ide safe, convenient access to the Urban1. Center and the Center Village; in . .... various .. modes of transportation, includi ng .Public mass transit,, in order to reduce; traffic` volumes and other impacts from vehicles; ensure. sufficient parking is provided, while encouraging creativity in reducing the impacts of parking areas; allaw.an. active pedestrian° environment°by maintaining contiguous street frontages, without parking lot siting along' sidewalks and building facades, minimize the visual impact of parking lots; and use access streets and parking to maintain an urban edge to the district 1. Surface Parking: intent: To maintain active pedestrian environments along streets by placing parking lots primarily in back of buildings. Guidelines: Surface parking shall be located and designed so as to reduce the visual impact of the parking area and associated vehicles. Large areas of surface parking shall also be designed to accommodate future infill development. Standard. Parking shall be located so that no surface parking is located between a building N/A and the front property line, or the building and side property line, on the street side of a corner lot. N/A Standard. Parking shall be located so that it is screened from surrounding streets by buildings, landscaping, and/or gateway features as dictated by location. 2. Structured Parking Garages: Intent: To promote more efficient use of land needed for vehicle parking; encourage the use of structured parking; physically and visually integrate parking garages with other uses; and reduce the overall impact of parking garages. Guidelines: Parking garages shall not dominate the streetscape; they shall be designed to be complementary with adjacent and abutting buildings. They shall be sited to complement, not subordinate, pedestrian entries. Similar forms, materials, and/or details to the primary building(s) should be used to enhance garages. N/A Standard: Parking structures shall provide space for ground floor commercial uses along street frontages at a minimum of seventy five percent (75%) of the building frontage width. Standard: The entire facade must feature a pedestrian -oriented facade. The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development may approve parking structures that do not feature a pedestrian orientation in limited circumstances. if allowed, the N/A structure shall be set back at least six feet (5) from the sidewalk and feature substantial landscaping. This landscaping shall include a combination of evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs, and ground cover. This setback shall be increased to ten feet (10) when abutting a primary arterial and/or minor arterial. N/A Standard: Public facing facades shall be articulated by arches, lintels, masonry trim, or other architectural elements and/or materials. N/A _ Standard: The entry to the parking garage shall be located away from the primary street, to either the side or rear of the building. Standard: Parking garages at grade shall include screening or be enclosed from view with N/A treatment such as walls, decorative grilles, trellis with landscaping, or a combination of treatments. Standard: The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee may allow a reduced setback where the applicant can successfully demonstrate that the landscaped area and/or other design treatment meets the intent of these standards N/A and guidelines. Possible treatments to reduce the setback include landscaping components plus one or more of the following integrated with the architectural design of the building: (a) Ornamental grillwork (other than vertical bars); (b) Decorative artwork; ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community omic Development Environmental Re Committee & Administrative 5ite Ploa Report FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER/ REN CENTER LUA12-095, 5A -A, ECF, MOD Report of December 17, 2012 Page 13 of 26 ERC/Site Plan Report (c) Display windows, (d) Brick, tile, or stone, (e) Pre -cast decorative panels; (f) Vine -covered trellis; (g) Raised landscaping beds with decorative materials; or (h)Other treatments that meet the intent of this standard.. 3. Vehicular Access: Intent. To maintain a contiguous and uninterrupted sidewalk by minimizing, consolidating, and/or eliminating vehicular access off streets. Guidelines: Vehicular access to parking garages and parking lots shall not impede or interrupt pedestrian mobility. The impacts of curb cuts to pedestrian access on sidewalks shall be minimized. N/A Standard: Access to parking lots and garages shall be from alleys, when available. if not available, access shall occur at side streets. Standard: The number of driveways and curb cuts shall be minimized, so that pedestrian circulation along the sidewalk is minimally impeded. m. PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT..7. Intent .To enhance the urban' chardcter of development'in the Urban Center and. the- Center Village by'. creating pedestrian.. networks and by providing strong links from streets and drives to building entrances; make the pedestrian,. environment. safer and'. more . convenient„ comfortable,' and pleasant to walk between businesses, onsidewalks to an.d f tom access points, and through parking lots; andpromote the use of multi -modal and public transportation systems in order to reduceother vehidulor traffic 1. Pedestrian Circulation: Intent: To create a network of linkages for pedestrians to improve safety and convenience and enhance the pedestrian environment. Guidelines: The pedestrian environment shall be given priority and importance in the design of projects. Sidewalks andjor pathways shall be provided and shall provide safe access to buildings from parking areas. Providing pedestrian connections to abutting properties is an important aspect of connectivity and encourages pedestrian activity and shall be considered. Pathways shall be easily identifiable to pedestrians and drivers. _ Standard: A pedestrian circulation system of pathways that are clearly delineated and connect buildings, open space, and parking areas with the sidewalk system and abutting properties shall be provided. (a) Pathways shall be located so that there are clear sight lines, to increase safety. (b) Pathways shall be an all-weather or permeable walking surface, unless the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed surface is appropriate for the anticipated number of users and complementary to the design of the development. Standard: Pathways within parking areas shall be provided and differentiated by material or N/A texture (i.e., raised walkway, stamped concrete, or pavers) from abutting paving materials. Permeable materials are encouraged. The pathways shall be perpendicular to the applicable building facade and no greater than one hundred fifty feet (150') apart. Standard. Sidewalks and pathways along the facades of buildings shall be of sufficient width to accommodate anticipated numbers of users. Specifically: (a) Sidewalks and pathways along the facades of mixed use and retail buildings 100 or more feet in width (measured along the facade) shall provide sidewalks at least 12 feet in width. The walkway shall include an S foot minimum unobstructed walking surface. (b) interior pathways shall be provided and shall vary in width to establish a hierarchy_ The widths shall be based on the intended number of users, to be no smaller than five feet (5') and no greater than twelve feet (12'). (c) For all other interior pathways, the proposed walkway shall be of sufficient width ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community comic Development Environmental Re Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER / REN' CENTER LUA12-095, SA -A, ECF, MOD Report of December 17, 2012 ��-'�^ �-^ � � _��______-T� �--Page 14 of 26 ERC/Site Plan Report to accommodate the anticipated number of users. A Standard: Mid -block connections between buildings shall be provided. estrian Amenities: rIntent. To create attractive spaces that unify the building and street environments and are inviting and rtablefor pedestrians; and provide publicly accessible areas thatfunction for a variety of activities, times of the year, and under typical seasonal weather conditions. uelines: The pedestrian environment shall be given priority and importance in the design of projects. Amenities that encourage pedestrian use and enhance the pedestrian experience shall be included. Standard: Architectural elements that incorporate plants, particularly at building entrances, in publicly accessible spaces and at facades along streets, sholl be provided. Standard: Amenities such as outdoor group seating, benches, transit shelters, fountains, and public art shall be provided. (a) Site furniture shall be made of durable, vandal- and weather -resistant materials that do not retain rainwater and can be reasonably maintained over an extended period of time. (b) Site furniture and amenities shall not impede or block pedestrian access to public spaces or building entrances. Standard: Pedestrian overhead weather protection in the form of awnings, marquees, canopies, or building overhangs shall be provided. These elements shall be a minimum of 4.5 feet wide along at least seventy 75 percent of the length of the building facade facing the street, a maximum height of 15 feet above the ground elevation, and no lower than S feet above ground level. iv. RECREATION AREASANDW MMON.OPEN. SPACE latent To ensure that areas for both passive and active recreation are ava&&e.to. residents, workers, and visitors and that; these .areas are of sufficient sire or the intended .activity and in convenient JocdnTo create usable -and inviting open. space that is accessible to. the putilic, and to promote pedestrian activity on streetsparticularly at street corners Guidelines Developments.loedted at street intersections. should provide. pedestrian-griented space: at the street corner to emphasize pedestrian activlty.(illustration 'beloiv). ,Recreation orad common .open space areas are integral aspects, fquality.developnrent.that encourage pedestrians and users. These areas. shall be provided in an amount 'that is. adequate to be : functional. and usable; they: shall 'also be landscaped and located so that they are appealing to Users and pedestrians N/A Standard: All mixed use residential and attached housing developments of ten (10) or more dwelling units shall provide common opens space and/or recreation areas. N/A Standard: Amount of common space or recreation area to be provided: at minimum fifty (50) square feet per unit. Standard: The location, layout and proposed type of common space or recreation area shall N/A be subject to approval by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee. Standard: At least one of the following shall be provided in each open space and/or recreation area (the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee may require more than one of the following elements for developments having more than one hundred (100) units): (a) Courtyards, plazas, or multi-purpose open spaces; N/A (b) Upper level common decks, patios, terraces, or roof gardens/pea-patches. Such spaces above the street level must feature views or amenities that are unique to the site and are provided as an asset to the development,- evelopment,(c) (c)Pedestrian corridors dedicated to passive recreation and separate from the public street system; (d) Recreation facilities including, but not limited to, tennis/sports courts, swimming ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Deportment of Community • comic Development Environmental Re Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER / REN CENTER _ _ LUA12-095, SA -A, ECF, MOD Report of December 17, 2012 Page 15 of 26 ERC/Site Plan Report pools, exercise areas, game rooms, or other similar facilities; or (e) Children's play spaces that are centrally located near a majority of dwelling units and visible from surrounding units. They shall also be located away from hazardous areas such as garbage dumpsters, drainage facilities, and parking areas. Standard: All buildings and developments with over thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of N/A nonresidential uses (excludes parking garage floorplate areas) shall provide pedestrian - oriented space. _ Standard: The pedestrian -oriented space for buildings and developments with over thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of nonresidential uses shall include all of the following: (a) Visual and pedestrian access (including barrier free access) to the abutting structures from the public right-of-way or a nonvehicular courtyard,- and N/A (b) Paved walking surfaces of either concrete or approved unit paving; and (c) On-site or building -mounted lighting providing at least four (4) foot-candles (average) on the ground; and (d) At least three (3) lineal feet of seating area (bench, ledge, etc.) or one individual seat per sixty (60) square feet of plaza area or open space. Standard: The following areas shall not count as pedestrian -oriented space for buildings and developments with over thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of nonresidential uses: (a) The minimum required walkway. However, where walkways are widened or enhanced beyond minimum requirements, the area may count as pedestrian - N/A oriented space if the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee determines such space meets the definition of pedestrian -oriented space. (b) Areas that abut landscaped parking lots, chain link fences, blank walls, and/or dumpsters or service areas. N/A Standard: Outdoor storage (shopping carts, potting soil bags, firewood, etc.) is prohibited within pedestrian -oriented space. v. BUILDING ARCHITECTURAL`DESIGN. intent.•, To encourage building design that lr unique :and urban in character, comfortable on a 'human scale, and uses, appropriate buiiding materials that are suitable for thg .Pacific Northwest, climate. To discourage franchise retail architecture. . 1. Building Character and Massing: Intent: To ensure that buildings are not bland and visually appear to be at a human scale, and ensure that all sides of a building, that can be seen by the public, are visually interesting. Guidelines: Building facades shall be modulated and%r articulated to reduce the apparent size of buildings, break up long blank walls, add visual interest, and enhance the character of the neighborhood. Articulation, modulation, and their intervals should create a sense of scale important to residential buildings. Standard: All building facades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no more than forty feet (40`). Staff Comment: The proposed fueling station is comprised of a canopy to cover the fuel pumps, which is required by pollution prevention and stormwater regulations and a small Not kiosk building. The subject use is permitted out right in the zone but does not contain Compliant buildings to address the specific standards identified in the Building and Architectural Design section of the Design District. Therefore, staff has coordinated with the applicant to provide a fuel station design which meets the intent of this portion of the Design District by providing a unique design which is appropriate and suitable for the Pacific Northwest and is unique from the franchise retail architecture of the standard Fred Meyer fuel station. The proposed design has added a mansard roof atop the canopy to add architectural style. ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community L omit Development Environmentai Re Committee & Administrative Site Pfan Report FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER / REN' CENTER LUA12-035, SA -A, ECF, MOD Report of December 17, 2012 Page 16 of 26 ERC/Site plan Report Additionally, the applicant is proposed to wrap the support poles with CMU block to add additional detailing. Furthermore, the standard color scheme used has been adjusted to utilize a muted tone which would consist of natural calors instead of the original red and blue striping. The combination of the above adjustments meet the intent of the Building and Architectural Design standards however, the final drawings including the muted color tones and CMU block columns were never provided to staff. Therefore, staff recommends as a condition of approval that final color elevations and materials are provided to and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval. The elevations shall depict CMU block basing the support poles and muted color palette. Detailing such as rough details and material types should be provided with the updated submittal. Not Standard. Modulations shall be a minimum of two feet (2) deep, sixteen feet (16) in height, Compliant and eight feet (8') in width. Staff Comment: See discussion above. Standard. Buildings greater than one hundred sixty feet (160') in length shall provide a N/A variety of modulations and articulations to reduce the apparent bulk and scale of the facade; or provide an additional special feature such as a clock tower, courtyard, fountain, or public gathering area. 2. Ground -Level Details: Intent: To ensure that buildings are visually interesting and reinforce the intended human -scale character of the pedestrian environment; and ensure that all sides of a building within near or distant public view have visual interest. Guidelines: The use of material variations such as colors, brick, shingles, stucco, and horizontal wood siding is encouraged. The primary building entrance should be made visibly prominent by incorporating architectural features such as a facade overhang, trellis, large entry doors, and/or ornamental lighting (illustration below). Detail features should also be used, to include things such as decorative entry paving, street furniture (benches, etc.), and/or public art. Standard. Human -scaled elements such as a lighting fixture, trellis, or other landscape Not feature shall be provided along the facade's ground floor. Compliant Doesn't depict human scaled elements. Staff Comment: See discussion above under Building Character and Massing. Standard: On any facade visible to the public, transparent windows and/or doors are Not required to comprise at least 50 percent of the portion of the ground floor facade that is Compliant between 4 feet and 8 feet above ground (as measured on the true elevation). An acortes Staff Comment: See discussion above under Building Character and Massing. Standard: Upper portions of building facades shall have clear windows with visibility into and out of the building. However, screening may be applied to provide shade and energy efficiency. The minimum amount of light transmittance for windows shall be 50 percent. _ N/A Standard: Display windows shall be designed for frequent change of merchandise, rather than permanent displays. '! _ Standard: Where windows or storefronts occur, they must principally contain clear glazing. Standard: Tinted and dark glass, highly reflective (mirror -type) glass and film are prohibited. Standard: Untreated blank walls visible from public streets, sidewalks, or interior pedestrian pathways are prohibited. A wall (including building facades and retaining walls) is Not considered a blank wall if: Compliant (a) it is a ground floor wall or portion of a ground floor wall over 6 feet in height has a horizontal length greater than 15 feet), and does not include a window, door, building modulation or other architectural detailing; or (e) Any portion of a ground floor wall has a surface area of 400 square feet or ERC/Site plan Report City of Renton Deportment of community. Yomic Development Environmental Re FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER/ REN CENTER Report of December 17, 2012 Committee & Administrative Site Plot? Report LUA12-095, 5A -A, ECF, _MOD Page 17 of 26 FRC/Site Plan Report greater and does not include a window, door, building modulation or other architectural detailing. Staff Comment: See discussion above under Building Character and Massing. Standard: if blank walls are required or unavoidable, blank walls shall be treated with one or more of the following: (a) A planting bed at least five feet in width containing trees, shrubs, evergreen ground cover, or vines adjocent to the blank wall; Not (b) Trellis or other vine supports with evergreen climbing vines; Compliant (c) Architecturol detailing such as reveals, contrasting materials, or other special detailing that meets the intent of this standard; (d) Artwork, such as bas-relief sculpture, mural, or similar; or (e) Seating area with special paving and seasonal planting. Staff Comment: See discussion above under Building Character and Massing. 3. Building Roof tines: intent: To ensure that roof forms provide distinctive profiles and interest consistent with an urban project and contribute to the visual continuity of the district. Guidelines: Building roof lines shall be varied and include architectural elements to add visual interest to the building_ Standard: Buildings shall use at least one of the following elements to create varied and interesting roof profiles: (a) Extended parapets; (b) Feature elements projecting above parapets, (c) Projected cornices; (d) Pitched or sloped roofs (e) Buildings containing predominantly residential uses shall have pitched roofs with a minimum slope of one to four (1:4) and shall have dormers or interesting roof forms that break up the massiveness of an uninterrupted sloping roof. 4. Building Materials: intent: To ensure high standards of quality and effective maintenance over time; encourage the use of materials that reduce the visual bulk of large buildings; and encourage the use of materials that add visual interest to the neighborhood. Guidelines: Building materials are an important and integral part of the architectural design of a building that is attractive and of high quality. Material variation shall be used to create visual appeal and eliminate monotony of facades. This shall occur on all facades in a consistent manner_ High quality materials shall be used if materials like concrete or block walls are used they shall be enhanced to create variation and enhance their visual appeal. Standard: All sides of buildings visible from a street, pathway, parking area, or open space Not shall be finished on all sides with the some building materials, detailing, and color scheme, or Compliant if different, with materials of the same quality. Staff Comment: See discussion above under Building Character and Massing. Not Standard: All buildings shall use material variations such as colors, brick or metal banding Compliant patterns or textural changes. Staff Comment: See discussion above under Building Character and Massing. Standard: Materials shall be durable, high quality, and consistent with more traditional Not urban development, such as brick, integrally colored concrete masonry, pre finished metol, Compliant stone, steel, glass and cast -in-place concrete. Staff Comment: See discussion above under Building Character and Massing. Not _ Standard. If concrete is used, walls shall be enhanced by techniques such as texturing, Compliant reveals, and/or coloring with a concrete coating or admixture. Staff Comment: See discussion above under Building Character and Massing. FRC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Deportment of Community comic Development Environmental Re ' Committee & Administrative Site Flan Report FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER/ REN CENTER LUA12-095, SA -A, ECF, MOF Report of december 17, 2012 Page 18 of 26 ERC/Site Flan Report Standard: If concrete block walls are used, they shall be enhanced with integral color, Not textured blocks and colored mortar, decorative bond pattern and/or shall incorporate other Compliant masonry materials_ Staff Comment: See discussion above under Building Character and Massing. Not Standard: All buildings shall use material variations such as colors, brick or metal banding, Compliant patterns, or textural changes. Staff Comment: See discussion above under Building Character and Massing_ vi. SIGNAGE: intent: To provide a means of identifying and advertising businesses, provide directional assistance; encourage signs that are both clear and of appropriate scale for the project, encourage quality signage that contributes to the character of the Urban Center and the Center Village; and create color and interest. Guidelines: Front -lit, ground -mounted monument signs are the preferred type of freestanding sign. Blade type signs, proportional to the building facade on which they are mounted, are encouraged on pedestrian -oriented streets. Alteration of trademarks notwithstanding, corporate signage should not be garish in color nor overly lit, although creative design, strong accent colors, and interesting surface materials and lighting techniques are encouraged. N/A Standard: Entry signs shall be limited to the name of the larger development. Standard: Corporate logos and signs shall be sized appropriately for their location. Staff Comment: The price sign located on the canopy detracts from the detailing provided to Not enhance the visual appearance of the structure. Therefore, staff recommends a condition of Compliant approval that the price sign located on the canopy either be eliminated and/or re -designed in a way that is compatible with the overall development. As such, staff recommends a condition of approval that the applicant provide a comprehensive sign package which provides compatibility with the proposed development and is appropriate for the location. N/A Standard: in mixed use and multi -use buildings, signage shall be coordinated with the overall building design. N/A Standard: Freestanding ground -related monument signs, with the exception of primary entry signs, shall be limited to five feet (5`) above finished grade, including support structure. Standard: Freestanding signs shall include decorative landscaping (ground cover and/or N/A shrubs) to provide seasonal interest in the area surrounding the sign. Alternately, signage may incorporate stone, brick, or other decorative materials as approved by the Director. Standard: All of the following are prohibited.- rohibited.a. a.Pole signs; b. Roof signs; and N/A c. Back -lit signs with letters or graphics on a plastic sheet (can signs or illuminated cabinet signs). Exceptions: Back -lit logo signs less than ten (10) square feet are permitted as area signs with only the individual letters back -lit (see illustration, subsection GS of this Section). viL LIGHTING: Intent -To ensure safety and security;provide adequate lighting levels in pedestrian areas. such as plazas, pedestrian walkways, parking areas; Wilding. . entries, and other public_ places, and Ancrease the visual„ attractiveness of Che area at all irme of the day ar�d night Gurdelinesi Lighting that lmproves pedestrian safety and also that creates. visual' inferest` n the building, and site during the evening hours shall -be provided Not Standard: Pedestrian -scale lighting shall be provided at primary and secondary building Compliant entrances_ Examples include sconces on building facades, awnings with down -lighting and decorative street lighting. ERC/Site Flan Report City of Renton Department of Community amic Development Environmental Re ' Committee & Administrative Site Pion Report FRED MEYER_FUEL CENTER/ REN CENTER LUA12-095, SA -A, ECF, MOD Report of December 17, 2012 Page 19 of 26 ERC/Site Plan Report Staff Comment: A lighting plan was not provided with the application; therefore staff recommends a condition of approval that lighting plan be provided that complies with the Design District standards_ Fuel stations typically are lit, however in some cases the lighting can be over intense resulting in compatibility issues with the surrounding development. The applicant shall also provide a lighting plan that identifies compliance with light trespassing standards. Staff recommends, as a condition of approval, the applicant be required to provide a lighting plan that adequately provides for public safety without casting excessive glare on adjacent properties at the time of building permit review. The lighting plan shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval. Standard: Corporate logos and signs shall be sired appropriately for their location. Standard: Accent lighting shall also be provided on building facades (such as sconces) and/or N/A to illuminate other key elements of the site such as gateways, specimen trees, other significant landscaping, water features, and/or artwork. Standard: Downlighting shall be used in all cases to assure safe pedestrian and vehicular movement, unless alternative pedestrian scale lighting has been approved administratively Not or is specifically listed as exempt from provisions located in RMC 4-4-075, Lighting, Exterior Compliant on -Site (i.e., signage, governmental flags, temporary holiday or decorative lighting, right -of - way -lighting, etc.). Staff Comment: See condition above. d PLANNED ALTfON O�� RDiNANTCE AND yDE11ELflPMENT3 AGE EEMEN� COMPUANCE�AN CONiSTEIN4Y Not applicable4 x ��5. ! .�P 'b G,.i aF.F' x( �..a'1' k 1�$ Ck #:t i::+t' JF ... tf •i ys 'C.-.": Wil. ' � ;��� � '�.��i.'-�h`aaff .�, +-, a£�� � _, � ,� �'.. �"-1 '. �� � - "{..i;� +,'� : ! . .' � 4 �'S�as•�.S r_ ��� s _' y �- +.. Y Structures: Restricting overscale structures and overconcentrotion of development on a particular portion of the site. The single structure is located in the center of the commercial building pad therefore there is not a concentration of development on the site. Circulation: Providing desirable transitions and linkages between uses, streets, walkways and adjacent properties_ Pedestrian access through maneuvering areas of a fuel station is discouraged. Pedestrian connections and linkages are provided via the required street frontage improvements and sidewalks. Additionally the applicant has proposed a total of 761 square feet of public plaza space along Rainier Ave S which is connected to the public sidewalk. Loading and Storage Areas: Locating, ^designing and screening storage areas, utilities, rooftop equipment, loading areas, and refuse and recyclables to minimize views from surrounding properties. The overall development would be screened via the landscaping required along the site frontage and along the bordering property lines. Views: Recognizing the public benefit and desirability of maintaining visual accessibility to attractive natural features. There are no large attractive natural features on or near the site for which to maintain visual accessibility. The applicant has proposed to limit the height of the proposed structure to 19 feet which mitigate view impacts from surrounding properties_ The applicant is proposing a landscape buffer ranging from 5 to 15 feet along the northern, southern, and eastern property lines to buffer the use from abutting properties. Landscaping: Using landscaping to provide transitions between development and surrounding ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community nomic Development Environmental Re FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER/ REN CENTER Report of December 17, 2012 Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report LUAI2-095, SA -A, ECF, MOA Page 20 of 26 properties to reduce noise and glare, maintain privacy, and generally enhance the appearance of the project. See Landscaping discussion under Findings Section 14_b. Lighting: Designing and/or placing exterior lighting and glazing in order to avoid excessive brightness or glare to adjacent properties and streets As stated above a lighting plan was not provided with the project materials. Staff recommended, as a condition of approval, the applicant be required to provide a lighting plan that adequately provides for public safety without casting excessive glare on adjacent properties at the time of building permit review. f ON SITE IMPACTS :.�'s Structure Placement: Provisions for privacy and noise reduction by building placement, spacing and orientation. The proposed fuel canopy has been placed on the site to accommodate the intended purpose of vehicle fueling. The site design and layout has been optimized to facilitate function and reduce potential queuing delays and at the same time screen the vehicular oriented use from the public realm by providing for landscape screening between the public sidewalk and pedestrian plaza area and the development itself. The cashers kiosk is centrally located which would allow for safe pedestrian movement when filling a vehicle. Structure Scale: Consideration of the scale of proposed structures in relation to natural characteristics, views and vistas, site amenities, sunlight, prevailing winds, and pedestrian and vehicle needs. The scale and bulk of the canopy is designed primarily for function and as required by pollution prevention standards. However, the subject fuel station has provided additional amenities in the form of a mansard roof and natural tone color palette to reduce the overall scale of the structure and its relationship to surrounding development. The proposed building is designed appropriately to allow adequate light and air circulation to the structure and the site. The design of the structures would not result in excessive shading of the property_ Natural Features: Protection of the natural landscape by retaining existing vegetation and soils, using topography to reduce undue cutting and filling, and limiting impervious surfaces. The site contains 18 trees of which all are proposed for removal_ Renton Municipal Code requires that 5 percent of the trees on site be retained. Of the 18 trees, 1 tree is required to be retained at the 5 percent retention rate. The applicant is proposing to retain 9 trees on site thereby complying with the tree retention requirements of the zone_ Topographically, the site is relatively flat. A geotechnical report for the site was submitted. Information on the water table and soil permeability with recommendations of appropriate flow control BMP options were included. The applicant is proposing the excavation of approximately 4,800 cubic yards of on-site material, primarily for the underground fuel storage tanks. Following construction the site would have an impervious surface cover of approximately 86 percent. Landscaping: Use of landscaping to soften the appearance of parking areas, to provide shade and privacy where needed, to define and enhance open spaces, and generally to enhance the appearance of the project. Landscaping also includes the design and protection of planting areas so that they are less susceptible to damage from vehicles or pedestrian movements. ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER / REN Report of December 17, 2012 nomic Development Environmental Re ' Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report CENTER LUA12-095, SA -A, ECF, MOD Page 21 of 26 The landscaping is used to provide a transition between the proposed development and the public right of way- The landscaping softens the appearance of the entire vehicular oriented development and generally enhances the appearance of the project. nl' 4AOC�S 9- Y, Location and Consolidation: Providing access points on side streets or frontage streets rather than directly onto arterial streets and consolidation of ingress and egress points on the site and, when feasible, with adjacent properties. I The site has one public street frontage, Rainier Ave S (Principal Arterial). The site is directly accessible from Rainier Ave 5 as primary access, along with secondary access internally from the Fred Meyer parking lot. A median will be installed as part of the Rainier Ave S improvements (LUA09-071) prohibiting the primary access to right-in/right-out which will reduce impacts onto Rainier Ave S. Internal Circulation. Promoting safety and efficiency of the internal circulation system, including the location, design and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian access points, drives, parking, turnarounds, walkways, bikeways, and emergency access ways. See Location and Consolidation discussion above. Loading and Delivery: Separating loading and delivery areas from parking and pedestrian areas. There are no dedicated loading or delivery areas proposed on site. Fuel tanks are located underground; delivery would be required by a fuel tanker truck which pumps the fuel into the underground tanks. Based on the provided site plan there appears to be sufficient space for delivery of fuel. Transit and Bicycles: Providing transit, carpools and bicycle facilities and access. The subject development does not require parking with the exception for employee parking; Therefore, bicycle parking would not be required. Pedestrians: Providing safe and attractive pedestrian connections between parking areas, buildings, public sidewalks and adjacent properties. Pedestrian access through maneuvering areas of a fuel station is discouraged. As such, the pedestrian connections and linkages are provided via the required street frontage improvements and sidewalks. Additionally the applicant has proposed a total of 761 square feet of public plaza space along Rainier Ave S which is connected to the public sidewalk. _jo-ser'vec'q"s­-dJs` Jnc -bod' WACE.* n6orpor ng,,,�,open -zspaces Pit' -,to"'provide . pasw -peuvelrecred 'POA Y'. d reasl� gon U1. Vwii� f ihis'l e.�': A _9 E The applicant has proposed a total of 761 square feet of public plaza space along Rainier Ave S at the northeast and southeast corners of the site. The public areas would provide additional space for pedestrians and passive recreation use. The applicant is also proposing the use of a metal bench at the northeast corner. %NDPU8UIC�_ ap q,�p'rdvldI' WIVIeW.rcri- rl-d-drJ's­" tb -h,'-re_ IjJej4 jWd 'M&P6jjJ P Ic oreine.," The proposed structure would not block view corridors to shorelines or Mt. Rainier. The public access requirement is not applicable as the site is not adjacent to a shoreline. 'pg.protect elements, ttingnatural systemswhere'applicable There are no natural systems located on site with the exception of drainage flows. 4 �";JFJ i'd vail6ble)R 41� an fatifides4 ?io!M - . I! _ . . Z .. .. d 6 rpq!.,. qPlf.. V 94�� T., ERC/Site plan Report City of Renton Deportment of Community nomic Devefopment Environmental Re FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER / REN CENTER Report of December 17, 2012 Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report LUA12-095, SA -A, ,ECF, MOD Page 22 of 26 ,i Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicated that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development; if the applicant provides Code required improvements and fees_ The applicant would be required to pay an appropriate Fire Impact Fee. Currently this fee is assessed at $0.52 per square foot of new building area. However, fees are not charged for canopy structures. Credit would be granted for the existing building to be removed, so no new fees would apply as the existing building is larger than the one proposed. Parks and Recreation: Not Applicable Drainage: Runoff from the site is collected in existing catch basins onsite. Runoff flows north and west through the Fred Meyer site. The flow then continues west in underground conveyance pipes to Hardie Ave SW where an arch pipe collects the flow and it is conveyed south. A preliminary drainage plan and drainage report has been submitted with the site plan application, prepared by Barghausen, dated October 12, 2012 (Exhibit 7). The report addresses compliance with the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and the 2009 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWM, Chapters 1 and 2. The conceptual drainage plan and report shows that a Filterra Water Quality system is proposed. The applicant is advised that the Filterra system has not been included in the KCSWDM or the DOE manual as an approved water quality treatment facility. The City only allows the use of the Filterra systems through an adjustment process. Staff has not supported requests to use these types of facilities in the past. Plans will be reviewed in detail prior to issuance of a construction permit, following the land use process. Transportation: The site has one public street frontage, Rainier Ave S (Principal Arterial). Access is proposed from an existing curb cut along Rainier Ave S. A secondary access would be provided via the Fred Meyer parking lot - The applicant provided a Traffic Impact Analysis, as part of the site pian application, prepared by Group MacKenzie, dated May 24, 2012. The study states that the stacking of vehicles for the proposed facility, with 18 fueling positions, would unlikely back up onto Rainier Ave S. Also based on the provided study the project would generate 21 new weekday daily trips. The study utilized reductions for internal capture trips (95 trips), pass -by trips (81 trips), and diverted trips (53 trips) in order to arrive at the final number of trips. The study also calculates the trip generation for the existing use at 36 primary trips. While it appears, based on the study provided, there are no additional trips proposed the City's Transportation Impact Fee is based on the number of pumps proposed for gas stations. In order to mitigate transportation impact the applicant would be required to pay an appropriate Transportation Impact Fee. Currently this fee is assessed at $12,642-00 per pump. However, the fee will change to $7,777.11 on January 1, 2013. Therefore the fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of payment, shall be payable to the City at the time of Building Permit issuance. Schools: Not Applicable. Water and Sewer: This site is located in the City of Renton Water service area. The site is in the 196 water pressure zone. The static pressure is approximately 74 psi at street level. It is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 1 or Zone 2. However, it is located in the Five Year Capture Zone. There is an existing 8 -inch DI water main located on the site. The preliminary fire flow requirement is 1,500 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 -feet of the proposed building, and a second hydrant is required within 300 -feet. Existing hydrants may be counted toward the requirement as long as they meet current code, including 5 -inch storz fittings. There is an existing eight -inch sanitary sewer main located on site. ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community nomic Development Environmental Re Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER/ REN CENTER LUA12-995, SA -A, ECF, MOD Report of December 17, 2012 Page 23 of 26 1 PHASING: The appy ant �s nnfiTequ60% airy additianal phasing request 1. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the responsible officials issue a Determination of Nan -Significance -Mitigated with one mitigation measure (Exhibit 6). 2. The proposal complies with the Site Plan Review Criteria if all conditions of approval are met and modification for approval. 3. The proposal is compliant and consistent with the pians, policies, regulations and approvals. 4. Staff does not anticipate any adverse impacts on surrounding properties and uses as long as the conditions of approval are complied with. S. The proposed use is anticipated to be compatible with existing and future surrounding uses as permitted in the CA zoning classification. 6. The scale, height and bulk of the proposed fuel facility is appropriate for the site. 7. Safe and efficient access and circulation has been provided for all users. s. There are adequate public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use. 9. Adequate parking for the proposed use has been provided. 10. The proposed site plan ensures safe movement for vehicles and pedestrians and has mitigated potential effects on the surrounding area if all conditions of approval are complied with. 11. The proposed development would not generate any long term harmful or unhealthy conditions. Potential noise, light and glare impacts from the proposed use have been evaluated and mitigated if all conditions of approval are complied with. 12. Landscaping has been provided in all areas not occupied by the building or paving. Additional landscaping has been provided in order to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. 1. DECISION: The proposed Site Plan, Parking/Stacking Lane, and Refuse and Recycle Modifications for the Fred Meyer Fueling Center / Renton Center, File No. LUA12-095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD are approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the 1 mitigation measure issued as part of the Determination of Non - Significance Mitigated, dated December 17, 2012 (Exhibit 6)- 2. The applicant shall provide final color elevations and materials are provided to be approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval. The revised elevations shall depict CMU block basing the support poles and a muted color palette. Detailing such as rough details and material types should be provided with the updated submittal. ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community nomic Development Environmental Re ' Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER/ REN CENTER LUA12-095, SA -A, ECF, MOD Report of December 17, 2012 Page 24 of 26 3. The price sign located on the canopy shall either be eliminated and/or re -designed in a way that is compatible with the overall development. The applicant shall provide a comprehensive sign package which provides compatibility with the proposed development and is appropriate for the location_ 4. The applicant shall be required to provide a lighting plan that adequately provides for public safety without casting excessive glare on adjacent properties at the time of building permit review. The lighting plan shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval. I z /lq (1-,> C.E. "Chip" Vincent, CED Administrator Date TRANSMITTED this 17`h day of December 2012 to the ContactfApplicant/Owner: Contact: BORA Mat Bergman 2106 Pacific Ave #300 Tocomo, WA 98402 Owner/Applicant: WSA DA 16000 Christensen Rd #150 Tukwila, WA 98188 TRANSMITTED this 1/h day of December 2012 to the Parties of Record: Gretchen Koehler Tony Seiger Department of Archaeology and 1150 Raymond Ave SW Historic Preservation Renton, WA 98057 PO Box 48343 Olympia, Washington 98504-8343 TRANSMITTED this 17`h day of December 2012 to the following: Neil Watts, Development Services Director Kayren Kittrick, Development Services Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Fire Marshal Renton Reporter Laird Use Action Appeals, Request for Reconsideration, & Expiration The Environmental Determination and the Administrative Site Development Plan Review decisions will become final if the decisions are not appealed within 14 days of the decision date. Environmental Determination Appeal: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 p.m., January 4, 2013. Administrative Site Development Plan ARproval Appeal: Appeals of the administrative site development plan review decision must be filed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 p.m. on January 4, 2013. ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community ramie Development Environrnentol Re Committee & Administrative Site Pian Report FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER / REN CENTER LUA12-095, 5A -A, ECF, MOD Report of December 17, 2012 Page 25 of 26 Parking Modification Approval Appeal: Appeals of the parking modification decision must be filed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 p.m. on January 4, 2013. APPEALS: An appeal of the decision(s) must be filed within the 14 -day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the $250.00 application fee to Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall - 7th Floor, (425) 430-6510. RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days of the decision date, any party may request that a decision be reopened by the Administrator (Decision -maker). The Administrator (Decision -maker) may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator (Decision -maker) finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14 -day appeal timeframe. EXPIRATION: The Administrative Site Development Plan Review decision will expire two (2) years from the date of decision. A single two (2) year extension may be requested pursuant to RMC 4-9-200. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE: provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning the land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial decision, but to Appeals to the Hearing Examiner as well. All communications after the decision/approval date must be made in writing through the Hearing Examiner. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the appeal by the Court. ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 3. Commercial, multi -family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m_, Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a -m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 4. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to final occupancy permits Water: 1. The preliminary fire flow requirement is 1,500 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 -feet of the proposed building, and a second hydrant is required within 300 -feet. Existing hydrants may be counted toward the requirement as long as they meet current code, including 5 -inch Storz fittings. 2. The proposed gas station would need to install a minimum 1" water meter with a RP in a "Hot Box". 3. The existing water meter needs to be cut, capped, and abandoned at the time of demolition. 4. System Development Charges are per dwelling unit and are based on the total number and size of any and all water meters. The Development Charges are collected as part of the construction permit. Sewer_ 1. The development's design needs to include what will be done with the pipe that runs east -west on the north side of ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community 7omic Development Environmental Re ' Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report FRED MEYER FUEL CENTER/ REN CENTER LUA12-095, 5A -A, ECF, MOD Report of December 17, 2012 Page 26 of 25 the restaurant building, whether it will remain in use or be removed. 2. A commercial building permit will trigger a separate review. 3. Separate drains for the concrete islands are required to be connected to an oil water separator downstream, in a vault in a positive direction. A shut off valve is required to be installed. 4. Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges are based on the size of the domestic water meter. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. 5. Note: The City has plans (within the next couple of years) for replacing the existing 8" private sanitary sewer along the westerly property line and making it public. The City will want to work with the applicant to coordinate future replacement Surface Water: 1. The conceptual drainage plan and report, which was submitted with the formal application, states the project will comply with the City of Renton Amendments to the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). 2. The conceptual drainage plan and report shows that a Filterra Water Quality system is proposed_ 3. Applicant is advised that the Filterra system has not been included in the KCSWDM or the DDE manual as an approved water quality treatment facility. The City only allows the use of the Filterra systems through an adjustment process. Applicant is encouraged to use one of the facilities listed in the KCSWDM_ 4. The Surface Water SDC fees are $0.405 per square foot of new impervious area_ These fees are Collected at the time a construction permit is issued. Transportation: 1. Additional offsite improvements are not required, as the City is installing improvements along Rainier Ave S. 2. Per City of Renton code, property corners at intersections in commercial blocks shall have a minimum radius of 25 feet at all lot corners at intersections of dedicated public rights-of-way, if not existing. 3. A Traffic Study was submitted with the formal application. 4. Project is subject to impact tee. The net fee per adopted impact fee is $70,329.34. Fire: 1. The preliminary fire flow requirement is 1,500 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 -feet of the proposed building and one hydrant is required within 300 -feet. Existing hydrants can be counted toward the requirement as long as they meet current code, including 5 -inch Storz fittings. It appears adequate fire flow and fire hydrants exist in this area. 2. The fire mitigation impact fees are currently applicable at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of building area. Fees are not charged for canopy structures. Credit would be granted for the existing building to be removed, so no new fees would apply as the old building is bigger than the one proposed. 3. Separate plans and permits are required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for review and permitting of all underground fuel tanks and tank monitoring systems. 4. All new commercial fuel dispensing facilities shall be provided with an approved on site standby power system to facilitate fuel dispensing during local power outages or disaster. 5. Fire department apparatus access is adequate. 6. An electronic site plan is required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for pre -fire planning purposes prior to occupancy of the building. General : 1. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two horizontal and vertical controls per the City's current horizontal and vertical control network. ERCISite Plan Report P� IMI'llf- JC)jw(aa6o.H aye Humull P� vi Humull cc 0 (-u vi cc 0 (-u vi z la�SayrpiJa !" ��� a�o.� `r�i i LD r�our3a�-d »g raYK rr❑ZCIS A3J P M F ids W t• W wLU `� a z I I J � 9 �f W J Q OL LO12 z - p / w •V4� r i� �� � c c� is � �La `' EA a Y J P `i.� � cl W ^ Ll r � IL cr LJ s�o 5 W IL l` ,1r I C k6 �q } J r U I � as < I C r F lesi'mMUM aM-191/ar8kfl9mc3k1 o k S g�o yl � E'S�SIB 118 �Wil ff � Y� YY N EEO � _ � ry _ — U W o N f _ _ N z Wc. ' °;- �m I o� ¢d K o U o U - I I � J Yea i I �Y � �• � � �ji Q is — a � �I U =$ ��� i��� ISI y 2 Y� •{i Y LL a W , y pis ala o .o �f.i i • � N CD U N EEO � _ � ry _ — U W o N f _ _ N z Wc. ' °;- �m I o� ¢d K o U o U - U CL J Q Z .o �f.i i • � N — U N d � � _ � a a _ — Z' i 4 N f � Z c� N Y � _ U 2 U f� Ii e � x W .r P a 0 CL 0 0 ry c a a `a 3 `m d) w 0J s W Group McckEnzie, Incorporated I,h -ctu'e ]n:E,iDrs Sir Ji •. ,r_! Civil enmna�riny Land U=e fl!a-ring May 16, 2012 (Revised May 24, 2072) 1 City of Renton Attention: Arneta Henninger 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Fred Meyer Fuel Facility - Renton Preliminary Traffic Information and Scoping Project Number 2120206-00 Dear Ms, Henninger: Cf y O F?er)toil Nov - I %01; L DD Group Mackenzie has prepared this letter to provide trip generation and distribution assumptions for the proposed Fred Meyer fuel facility, to address requirements for a traffic study and to address on-site queuing. The proposed fuel facility will be located in the northeast corner of the existing Fred Meyer store parking lot, replacing an existing retail building with a Blockbuster Video and Terero's restaurant as the most recent tenants. The fuel facility will include nine pumps providing 18 fueling positions and an attendant's kiosk. Access will be provided from an existing driveway on Rainier Avenue, and through the Fred Meyer parking lot, which has a number of driveways including a signal on Rainier Avenue adjacent to the site. We understand a median will be installed with the planned improvements on Rainier Avenue, which will limit the site driveway to right turns. i Both the current use of the property as a retail building and the proposed use as a fuel facility are allowed uses under the current property zoning. TRIP GENERATION Trip generation estimates have been prepared for both the proposed Fred Meyer fuel facility and the existing building's uses using rates in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, gth Edition as well as trip surveys for Fred Meyer fuel facilities. Total Trips Total trips are simply the number of vehicle trips to the fuel facility and consist of internal, pass -by, diverted linked and primary trips. 7ran=-tat'cn l Pie-, ng Internal Trips Lan�s.aoe i In retail development such as a Fred Meyer shopping center, many customers take advantage of ��w ! the multiple services and retailers at the site in a single trip. These are known as internal or shared trips. Surveys included in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook indicate typical shared trip Locations. Teen retail uses are 20%. This 20% internal trip rate is applied for the uses at the EXHIBIT 5 H:Troj ects12120206001 W"PILTRi 120516 -Preliminary Traffic Information-Rk: V.doc City of `,; DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT] r1" ENVIRONMENTAL. (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS -M) PROJECT NUMBER: LUA12-095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD EXHIBIT 6 APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: John Coombes, Fred Meyer Stores, I Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Rainier PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a Fred Meyer Fuel Center featuring a 6,880 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot kiosk, and two modifications in order to increase the maximum front yard setback and to reduce stacking capacity for the vehicle stacking lanes. PROJECT LOCATION: 439 Rainier Avenue S LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-9-070D Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on January 4, 2013. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: December 21, 2012 December 17, 2012 4J'4e-a0 Z 4my,�� Gregg Zim ma , Administrator Mark Peterso , Administrator Public Work Department Date Fire & Emergency Services Date Terry Higashiyama, Administra or Community Services Department C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator Date Department of Community & Economic Development \Z I Y:� (I e,_>_ Date TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT Fred Meyer Fuel Center - #459 Renton Center 431 Rainier Avenue South Renton, Washington E. tiE NrA.S/ft, 42.779 -i�lrtr eL•t� EXHIBIT 7 10/0011 - Prepared for: The Kroger Co. 3800 S.E. 22nd Avenue Portland, OR 97202 October 19, 2012 Our Job No. 13245 0 CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES ♦ OLYMPIA, WA ♦ TACOMA, WA * CONCORD, CA ♦ TEMECULA, CA www.barghausen.com IThe R, Grou Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT "fid► 0f Renton PREPARED BY: NOV ! 1!11 THE RILEY GROUP, INC. 17522 BOTHELL WAY NORTHEAST BOTHELL, WASHINGTON 98011 PREPARED FOR: FRED MEYER STORES, INC. 3800 SOUTHEAST 22ND AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97202 PROTECT N0.2012-247 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT FRED MEYER FUELING FACILITY EXHIBIT R431 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH ENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 JUNE 5 2012 SERVING THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST Western Washington, Corporate Office Eastern Washington & Oregon Office 17522 Bothell Way Northeast 1838 South Washington Street Bothell, Washington 98011 Kennewick, Washington 99337 Phone 425.415.0551 + Fax 425.415.0.311 Phone 509.586.4840 • Far 509. 586.4863 www.riley-group.com tt lw c 40 eo d a 0 m in z� a P _It IU) �a LL 63 i O�- i� N N C � p O o N M N 0.J d -CL <w z z° yr �,y. a U tt lw c 40 eo d a 0 m in z� a P _It IU) �a LL 63 i O�- .� 'j � �i� % • fit'•` �r W SIF - r� yr �,y. ��. _ _ j •• w s a 411 a I • Y7 . �S -..' JL •- Jam` �} . tt lw c 40 eo d a 0 m in z� a P _It IU) �a LL City Of on Department of Community & Economic D opment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBERS, 2012; APPLICATION NO: LUA12-095, ECF, SA -A, M DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 21, 2012 s ;a =� APPLICANT: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. - James CoPROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons-� PROJECT TITLE: Fred Meyer Fueling Station on"ierPROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger m SITE AREA: 49,200 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 22,515 square fefjr, LOCATION: 439 Rainier Avenue S PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 6,880 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested SERA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a Fred Meyer Fuel Center featuring a 6,880 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot kiosk at 439 Rainier Ave S. The project would require the installation of a 20,000 gallon underground storage for unleaded fuel, and an 18,000 gallon split underground fuel taking divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. An approximate 1.13 acre commercial pad, of the larger 4.27 acre site, would be used to the site the proposed fueling center, The an existing 22,515 square foot structure, formerly occupied by Blockbuster and Toreros is proposed for demolition. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning classification and within Design District 'D'. Access would continue to be gained from Rainier Ave S. The applicant is requesting two modifications in order to increase the maximum front yard setback and to reduce stacking capacity for the vehicle stacking lanes. There are no critical areas on site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline use Animols Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts !Necessary Housin Aesthetics Li hVGlare Recreation utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10, 000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this apphcation with particulur attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wher_ad^nal information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative 12,5 Date 00 r'�ptv An1 -LDEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY r� AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: November 30, 2012 TO: Rocale Timmons, Planner FROM: Arneta Henninger, Plan Review SUBJECT: Fred Meyer Rainier Fueling Station 439 Rainier Ave S LUA 12-095 Parcel 000720-0209 1 have completed a review for the above -referenced proposal for the Fred Meyer gas station located on the west side Rainier Ave S between S 3', PI and S 4th PI all in Section 18, Township 23N, Range 5E, which proposes to construct a cashier's kiosk with a bathroom and a canopy covering nine multi -product dispensers for fueling positions. The following comments are based on the application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant. EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER: This site is located in the City of Renton Water service area. The site is in the 196 water pressure zone. The static pressure is approximately 74 psi at street level. It is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 1 or Zone 2. However, it is located in the Five Year Capture Zone. There is an existing 8" DI water main located on the site; see City of Renton water drawing W2060 for detailed engineering drawings. SEWER: There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer main located on site. See City of Renton drawing # 5- 3298. STORM: There are storm drainage facilities in Rainier Ave S and onsite. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The preliminary fire flow requirement is 1,500 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 -feet of the proposed building, and a second hydrant is required within 300 -feet. Existing hydrants may be counted toward the requirement as long as they meet current code, including 5 -inch Storz fittings. 2. The proposed gas station would need to install a minimum 1" water meter with a RP in a "Hot Box". 3. The existing water meter needs to be cut, capped, and abandoned at the time of demolition. 4 Fred Meyer Rainier Fueling System _UA 12-095 Page 2 of 3 December 7, 2012 4. System Development Charges are per dwelling unit and are based on the total number and size of any and all water meters. The Development Charges are collected as part of the construction permit. SANITARY SEWER 1, The development's design needs to include what will be done with the pipe that runs east -west on the north side of the restaurant building, whether it will remain in use or be removed. 2. A commercial building permit will trigger a separate review. 3. Separate drains for the concrete islands are required to be connected to an oil water separator downstream, in a vault in a positive direction. A shut off valve is required to be installed. 4. Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges are based on the size of the domestic water meter. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. 5. Note: The City has plans (within the next couple of years) for replacing the existing 8" private sanitary sewer along the westerly property line and making it public. The City will want to work with the applicant to coordinate future replacement. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. Additional offsite improvements are not required, as the City is installing improvements along Rainier Ave S. 2. Per City of Renton code, property corners at intersections in commercial blocks shall have a minimum radius of 25 feet at all lot corners at intersections of dedicated public rights-of-way, if not existing. 3. A Traffic Study was submitted with the formal application. 4. Project is subject to impact fee. The net fee per adopted impact fee is $70,329.34. STORM DRAINAGE 1. The conceptual drainage plan and report, which was submitted with the formal application, states the project will comply with the City of Renton Amendments to the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), 2. The conceptual drainage plan and report shows that a Filterra Water Quality system is proposed. Applicant is advised that the Filterra system has not been included in the KCSWDM or the DOE manual as an approved water quality treatment facility. The City only allows the use of the Filterra systems through an adjustment process. Applicant is encouraged to use one of the facilities listed in the KCSWDM. 3. The Surface Water SDC fees are $0.405 per square foot of new impervious area. These fees are Collected at the time a construction permit is issued. GENERAL 1. All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals, prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards, by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical Control Network. H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PROJECTS\12-095. Roca le\Plan Review Comments PRE 12-095.docx Fred Meyer Rainier Fueling System -UA 12-095 Page 3 of 3 December 7, 2012 3. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. H:\CED\PIanning\Current Planning\PROJECTS\12-095.Rocale\Plan Review Comments PRE 12-095.docx City of __..nton Department of Community & Economic-,- Mopment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ("16Ln 1 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBERS, 2012 APPLICATION NO: LUA12-095, ECF, 5A -A, MOD, MOD DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 21, 2012 APPLICANT: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. - James Coombes PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons iV u'd 2 ; "'0 .'. PROJECT TITLE: Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Rainier PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger SITE AREA: 49,200 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 22,515 square feet LOCATION: 439 Rainier Avenue S PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 6,880 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a Fred Meyer Fuel Center featuring a 6,880 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot kiosk at 439 Rainier Ave S. The project would require the installation of a 20,000 gallon underground storage for unleaded fuel, and an 18,000 gallon split underground fuel taking divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. An approximate 1.13 acre commercial pad, of the larger 4.27 acre site, would be used to the site the proposed fueling center. The an existing 22,515 square foot structure, formerly occupied by Blockbuster and Toreros is proposed for demolition. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning classification and within Design District 'D'. Access would continue to be gained from Rainier Ave S. The applicant is requesting two modifications in order to increase the maximum front yard setback and to reduce stacking capacity for the vehicle stacking lanes. There are no critical areas on site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Lond/ShoreHne Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housin Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services HistaricfCultural Preservation Airport Environment 10, 000 Feet 14,000 Feet C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we hove expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ad itiona! infarrna ipn is nee ed to properly assess this proposal. ,� J Signature of Dire�-6r or Authorized Representative C Date Wh �- �N�� S# 906 TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION FEE Project Name: Fred Meyer Gas Center Project Address: Rainier Avenue Contact Persan: Permit Number: Project Description: 18 fueling stations Existing restaurant and retail to be removed SUBJECT TO IMPACT FEE OR MITIGATION AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: ❑ Residential ITE Trip Generation Manual, 81" Edition X Retail Traffic Study ❑ Non -retail X Other PER ADOPTED IMPACT FEES (EFFECTIVE 1/1/2013): $139,987.98 Credits: Sit-down Restaurant 5,444 sq ft c$51,935.76> Shopping Center 5,504 sq ft <$17,722.88> NET FEE PER ADOPTED IMPACT FEES: $70,329.34 Transportation Mitigation Fee: $70,329,34 Calculated by: K.Kittrick Date: 12/01/2012 Date of Payment: City o ratan Department of Community & Economic1elopment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P z COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBERS, 2012 APPLICATION NO: LUA12-095, ECF, 5A -A, MOD, MOD DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 21, 2012 APPLICANT: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. - James Coombes PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Rainier PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger SITE AREA: 49,200 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 22,515 square feet LOCATION: 439 Rainier Avenue S PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 6,880 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a Fred Meyer Fuel Center featuring a 6,880 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot kiosk at 439 Rainier Ave S. The project would require the installation of a 20,000 gallon underground storage for unleaded fuel, and an 18,000 gallon split underground fuel taking divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. An approximate 1.13 acre commercial pad, of the larger 4.27 acre site, would be used to the site the proposed fueling center. The an existing 22,515 square foot structure, formerly occupied by Blockbuster and Toreros is proposed for demolition. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning classification and within Design District 'D`. Access would continue to be gained from Rainier Ave S. The applicant is requesting two modifications in order to increase the maximum front yard setback and to reduce stacking capacity for the vehicle stacking lanes. There are no critical areas on site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shorefine Use Animols Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li ht/Gfare Recreotion Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10, 000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wire additional information *—needed to properly assess this proposal. re of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of .:..nton Department of Community & Economic — velopment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: r-+ COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER S, 2012 APPLICATION NO: LLJA12-095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 21, 2012 APPLICANT: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. - James Coombes PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Rainier PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger r SITE AREA: 49,200 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 22,515 square feet LOCATION: 439 Rainier Avenue S PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 6,880 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a Fred Meyer Fuel Center featuring a 6,880 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot kiosk at 439 Rainier Ave S. The project would require the installation of a 20,000 gallon underground storage for unleaded fuel, and an 18,000 gallon split underground fuel taking divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel_ An approximate 1.13 acre commercial pad, of the larger 4.27 acre site, would be used to the site the proposed fueling center. The an existing 22,515 square foot structure, formerly occupied by Blockbuster and Toreros is proposed for demolition. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning classification and within Design District 'D'. Access would continue to be gained from Rainier Ave S. The applicant is requesting two modifications in order to increase the maximum front yard setback and to reduce stacking capacity for the vehicle stacking lanes_ There are no critical areas on site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT fe.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use A nim als Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housin Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: November 26, 2012 TO: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Fred Meyer Fueling Station Environmental impact Comments: 1. The fire mitigation impact fees are currently applicable at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of building area. Fees are not charged for canopy structures. Credit would be granted for the existing building to be removed, so no new fees would apply as the old building is bigger than the one proposed. Code Related Comments: 1. The preliminary fire flow requirement is 1,500 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required_ One fire hydrant is required within 150 -feet of the proposed building and one hydrant is required within 300 -feet. Existing hydrants can be counted toward the requirement as long as they meet current code, including 5 -inch storz fittings. It appears adequate fire flow and fire hydrants exist in this area. 2. Separate plans and permits are required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for review and permitting of all underground fuel tanks and tank monitoring systems. 3. All new commercial fuel dispensing facilities shall be provided with an approved on site standby power system to facilitate fuel dispensing during local power outages or disaster. 4. Fire department apparatus access is adequate. 5. An electronic site plan is required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for pre -fire planning purposes prior to occupancy of the building. City of .._..ton Department of Community & Economic. iopment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F, VZ COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 5, 2012 APPLICATION NO: LUA12-095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 21, 2012 APPLICANT: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. - James Coombes PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TiTLE: Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Rainier PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger SITE AREA: 49,200 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 22,515 square feet LOCATION: 439 Rainier Avenue S PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 6,880 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a Fred Meyer Fuel Center featuring a 6,880 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot kiosk at 439 Rainier Ave S. The project would require the installation of a 20,000 gallon underground storage for unleaded fuel, and an 18,000 gallon split underground fuel taking divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. An approximate 1.13 acre commercial pad, of the larger 4.27 acre site, would be used to the site the proposed fueling center. The an existing 22,515 square foot structure, formerly occupied by Blockbuster and Toreros is proposed for demolition. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning classification and within Design District 'D'. Access would continue to be gained from Rainier Ave S. The applicant is requesting two modifications in order to increase the maximum front yard setback and to reduce stacking capacity for the vehicle stacking lanes. There are no critical areas on site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Nora -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information impacts impacts Necessary Eorth Air Water Pian is Loodl5horeline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ NaturolResources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Trans ortotion Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to roperly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Cityof penton Department of Community & Economic _ - .-,lopment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBERS, 2012 APPLICATION NO: LUA12-095, ECF, SA -A, Md, MOD DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 21, 2012 APPLICANT: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. - James Coo mbes PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Rainier PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger SITE AREA: 49,200 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 22,515 square feet LOCATION: 439 Rainier Avenue S PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 6,880 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a Fred Meyer Fuel Center featuring a 6,880 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot kiosk at 439 Rainier Ave S. The project would require the installation of a 20,000 gallon underground storage for unleaded fuel, and an 18,000 gallon split underground fuel taking divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. An approximate 1.13 acre commercial pad, of the larger 4.27 acre site, would be used to the site the proposed fueling center. The an existing 22,515 square foot structure, formerly occupied by Blockbuster and Toreros is proposed for demolition. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning classification and within Design District 'D'. Access would continue to be gained from Rainier Ave S. The applicant is requesting two modifications in order to increase the maximum front yard setback and to reduce stacking capacity for the vehicle stacking lanes. There are no critical areas on site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li ht/Glare Recreation utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS �-tiL ") I l \ 1 C. CODE-RFLATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of proboble impact or areas where additional information -is needed t properly assess this proposal. Q, Signature of Director_ r Authorized Representative _ Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic D..,.elopment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBERS, 2012_:'-. APPLICATION NO: LUA12-095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, M0D DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 21, 2012 APPLICANT: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. -James Coornbes PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale TimmonsQ PROJECT TITLE: Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Rainier PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger SITE AREA: 49,200 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 22,515 square feet LOCATION: 439 Rainier Avenue S PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 6,880 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a Fred Meyer Fuel Center featuring a 6,880 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot kiosk at 439 Rainier Ave S. The project would require the installation of a 20,000 gallon underground storage for unleaded fuel, and an 18,000 gallon split underground fuel taking divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. An approximate 1.13 acre commercial pad, of the larger 4.27 acre site, would be used to the site the proposed fueling center. The an existing 22,515 square foot structure, formerly occupied by Blockbuster and Toreros is proposed for demolition. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning classification and within Design District V. Access would continue to be gained from Rainier Ave S. The applicant is requesting two modifications in order to increase the maximum front yard setback and to reduce stacking capacity for the vehicle stacking lanes. There are no critical areas on site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plan is tond/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS 6E - Elementof the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li hVGlare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 24, 000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic D. sJopment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: De COMMENTS D E: DECEMBER 5, 2012 APPLICATION NO: LUA12-095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD DATE CIRCULATED. OVEMBER 21, 2012 APPLICANT: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. - James Coombes PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Rainier PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger SITE AREA: 49,200 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 22,515 square feet LOCATION: 439 Rainier Avenue S PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 6,880 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a Fred Meyer Fuel Center featuring a 6,890uare_f9ot canopy and a 160 square foot kiosk at 439 Rainier Ave S. The project would require the installation of a 20,000 gallon underground storage for unleaded fuel, and an 18,000 gallon split underground fuel taking divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. An approximate 1.13 acre commercial pad, of the larger 4.27 acre site, would be used to the site the proposed fueling center. The an existing 22,515 square foot structure, formerly occupied by Blockbuster and Toreros is proposed for demolition. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning classification and within Design District 'D'. Access would continue to be gained from Rainier Ave S. The applicant is requesting two modifications in order to increase the maximum front yard setback and to reduce stacking capacity for the vehicle stacking lanes. There are no critical areas on site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Cade) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS I �/V) Po r -+A & F'K1 0 ".. -t� ftK OVI-e— C CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics 11 hVGlare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Fnvironment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature gKireltor or Authorized Representative Z(p jZ Date NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS -NI) (CED)- Plmning ➢Didion of the CNV -I eMnneThe loAa«ng briefly describes the opil,ation and the e,e-1Y Publlc App- -1 -DATE OF NO CE Of APPLICATION- November 21, 2012 LAND USE NUMBER: LUAll-045, ECF, 5A-0. MOD, MOD PROJECT NAME: Fre4 Meyer Fueling Station on Rainier PROJECT UESCR1PT1ON:The appll has requested SEPA Enulronmental RPV]!w and 51,:,Pl e an Review for the constronWn of a Fred Meyer Fuel Ce Mer featuring a 6,830 square foot Canopy and a 160 Square root kiosk at 139 Ra in ler Avr S. The project wO0ld require the Ino Ioban of a 20,000 gallon underground storage for unleaded ale and an Sg,000 galrou in, split undergnd fuel taklug divided between diesel and Supreme uned leadfuel. An appmal 1.13 rue cgmmegla! pad, of LIK larger 4.27 e e she, would be used in the site the proposed fueling center, The an n existing 11.515 square foot s[rutturr, svrmerM ocrupled by 9iorkbuster and Tote,os u proposed for demolition. The site is boated In the Commer,lal Arterial IEAI —Ing- fie ' itlo, and within Design SNslrin0'. Ac[ess would conllnue to be gained Isom Ralnler Ave S. The i liwm Is req,esting two modlfkahons In order Jo Increase the maximum Iron[ yard setback and to reduce stadkmy capacity for the vehide stacking limes. There are no critical areas on site, PROJECT LOCATION: 439 Rainler Avenue 5 OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NO N I RCpNCE, MITIGATED IDMS -MI: As the Lead Agnty, the CifY of Renton has determined that significant environmental impact' art milkily to result from the proposed pro]en, Therefore. as emitted under the RCW 43.21C -,IU, the City of Renton is using the Optional," D process to give notice that a DNS, M Is likely to be issued. Eommenl periods far the projen and the P*opoNS-M are integrated into a -Sl, comment period, Thee will he no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Oeterminatlon of Non- SignlT,canerMlligated IDNS-M. A 34.day appeal period will follow the hs'.+ancr of the ONS -M. PERMIT APPUCATION DATE: November 1, 2D12 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: November 1C, 2012 APPLICA.NTIPRDJfCf CONTACT PERSON: Rib er,m'Nelil, Barghausen eensuNing Engineers, Im.; 1921572"` Avneue 5; gent, WA 96032; En l: bmneillillbarghausen<omf Permitslterlew Requested: Enylmnmental(SEPA) R,,I—, Adminlst-lva Site Plan Review, Othar Permits whl,h may be regWled: RulMP&CCnstroctind, Fire, and Sign Permits Rea++estad 5tudln: Dralnage Report, Genled,nl[al Report, and Traffld impart Analysts LPcatlpn where appf-t -1 may _ be revle-6: Dl000,emoFlool R—Community &Fconoml059 South Gir (e Way, Renton. WA Divisldn, Sldh F1oar Renton Clry Ndl, 1055 South Grady 98o57 PUBLIC NEAR[NG: NIA If you W WId like to be made ai CEDE rer._Plannng DIv_.10555an GradYtran an I Is Renta PrWA 9 05Opowd r]glrrl complete this fon^ end rem^, In Ory of Re ,to,. le No Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Ralnier/LUA12-DBS, ECF. SA.A, MOD, MOD NAME. MAIUNG ADORES$: TELEPHONE NO, - cONSiSEENCY OVERVIEW; - Zeming/iandUse fie subsea slte is deslgnatedCemmerclal Corridor IUCj on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and C.Durr—,al Arterial (CAj on the Clty's Zoning Map. Envlrommmal Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Pro].,%: E—ronmema115EPA] Ch-ld,ii oeveloPment rtegulallons Used For Purled MNlg.1mo: The proled wall be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-2.120A and other applicable [Ades ane regalations as appmpriate- Proposed Mitlgatlan Mraaures' The fodpwing Mitigation Measares will fl ely be imposed On the prppnl,d project. These recommended MYlgatlon Measures address project impa[ts not i—edbyeaisling vd,sandregulationsascitedabove, • The appOroutt wh1 be requ,rrd to poy the vpjoroprble lronsperfohon MRlgvfiun/Impwr Fee; The appilcoat will be regwred to poy Ihr oppropriole Fire Mih9eU.,0rm udl Fee; and • the vprib—t WU be required to suomh on orchoeolopicoi survey lhot conforms to the requiremens and swdordi of the washinptpo Stat, Ohre of ArcFivedog y and Historic Pr,servvtion. Comm u,U on the above appiliatior must be submitted In writing 1, Rotate Tlmm,na, Asaoclate Planner, UD - Planning Dlrlelon, 1055 South Grady way, Renton, WA 96057, by S. -OD PMon Dezember S. 1011. If you here q,d,Uons about Ihis propose:. or —h to be made a party or record and rete ve addltianal natifcatlon by mail, eontact the P,o�ea Manages. Anyone Who submits written comments will imm—k-hy become a party of record and will be nail Fled Of any de.]aion on this project. CONTACT PERSON: RDcale Timmons, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7219; Eml: rtimmons@rentonwa,gov PLEASE INCLU DE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN GALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTI F MATION paana.» Yof WR.FNTQl4. tonSHE CERTIFICATION I, hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted inconspicuous places or nearby the described pro rty o Date: ZI/ l C� _ Signed: STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that « signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated:: 1�iw►.,�:t' �, t c 12 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print):_ it My appointment expires: Ij J CITY OF RENTON L NG T - PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOP AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MA osited in the mails of the United documents. Thisanformat on wates, seled ss'.toyning On the 21st day of November, 2012, i dep Notice of Application (NOA), Environmental Checklist, Site Plan docum Representing ______ --- Name See Attached Agencies 300' Surrounding Property Owners- NOA only See attached f t e (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON SS 11L)00. Irt s-a�'. cO U NTY OF KING %''q' p�w�a,,. �► free and voluntary act dtrl le! urposes that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M Tucker�+1�`y �~ I certify t fi signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their e mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Notary (Print): My appointment expires: No Public in and for the State of Washington Project Name:PLU ProjectNumber:095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD template - affidavit of service by mailing r • AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology ** WDFW - Larry Fisher* Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. Environmental Review Section 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 Issaquah, WA 98027 39015-172 rd Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region * Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert King Area Dev. Serv., MS -240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 17fd Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers * KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Gretchen Kaehler Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin PO Box 48343 PO Box C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Boyd Powers * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastie City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Steve Roberge Attw Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev, Director Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. **Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov template - affidavit of service by mailing +-. .1e 0 ALAKASHEY - TAHSSEN BNSF CAPELOUTO LEON S 150 SW SUNSET BLVD PO BOX 961089 PO BOX 16719 RENTON, WA 98059 FORT WORTH, TX 76161 SEATTLE, WA 98116 CARS-DB4 LP CHAO CHAI & YEN CITY VIEW CHURCH 8270 GREENSBORO DR #950 10821 RAINIER AVE S 255 HARDIE AVE S W MCLEAN , VA 22102 SEATTLE, WA 98178 RENTON, WA 98055 COOKS JAMES V CSK AUTO CORP STORE #3696 D & C INVESTMENTS LLC C!0 THOMSON REUTERS PTS PO BOX 729 PO BOX 06116 720 RAINIER AVE S CHELAN , WA 98816 CHICAGO, IL 60606 RENTON, WA 98057 DSB INVESTMENTS LLC DUNLAP BAPTIST CHURCH INC FRED MEYER STORES INC CIO NICKEL & COMPANY 95 S TOBIN ST #201 330 SW 43RD ST #K-293 PO BOX 35547 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 TULSA, OK 74153 GOULD ALVIN R & W NELSON J J J INC JACK IN THE BOX CIO EPROPERTY TAX DEPT 401 8464 W MERCER WAY 5641 PLEASURE PT PO BOX 4900 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 BELLEVUE , WA 98006 SCOTTSDALE , AZ 85261 MALIK DAVID MAZZARELLA I LLC MT DEVELOPMENT CO LLC MICHAELIS DAVIS & BETTY 26220 116TH AVE SE 5015 15TH AVE NW 710 CARDLEY AVE #B KENT, WA 98030 SEATTLE, WA 98107 MEDFORD , OR 97504 RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 SAFEWAY INC STORE 1563 SOUTH LAKE VETERNARY VENTUR CIO COMPREHENSIVE PROP TAX 300 SW 7TH ST 1371 OAKLAND BLVD STE 200 504 RENTON CENTER WAY SW RENTON, WA 98055 WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 RENTON , WA 98057 TENNESSEE GROUP LLC TOULA PROPERTIES LLC WALTRUST PROPERTIES INC 715 LIND AVE S 1815 ROLLING HILLS AVE SE 104 WILMOT RD #1420 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 DEERFIELD , IL 60015 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNTY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE: BY MAILING On the 20th day of November, 2012, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Notice of Complete Application/Acceptance Letter documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Robert McNeill Contact James Coombes - Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. Owner/Applicant (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON )" SS COUNTY OF KING ) certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker 5 signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary a mentioned in the instrument. •�` Qtl►Ri f �y i t 44n►1aa1•`6 � � R Vp�f q,4 urposes Dated: Notary=Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print): My appointment expires: Project Name: Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Rainier Project Number: LUA12-095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD City OfW, X'Mosol \� fl L NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS -M) A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) — Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: November 21, 2012 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA1Z-095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD PROJECT NAME: Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Rainier PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review and Site Plan Review for the construction of a Fred Meyer Fuel Center featuring a 6,880 square foot canopy and a 160 square foot kiosk at 439 Rainier Ave S. The project would require the installation of a 20,000 gallon underground storage for unleaded fuel, and an 18,000 gallon split underground fuel taking divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. An approximate 1.13 acre commercial pad, of the larger 4.27 acre site, would be used to the site the proposed fueling center. The an existing 22,515 square foot structure, formerly occupied by Blockbuster and Toreros is proposed for demolition. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning classification and within Design District V. Access would continue to be gained from Rainier Ave S. The applicant is requesting two modifications in order to increase the maximum front yard setback and to reduce stacking capacity for the vehicle stacking lanes. There are no critical areas on site. PROJECT LOCATION: 439 Rainier Avenue S OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS -M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS -M process to give notice that a DNS - M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed l]NS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There wifl be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- Significance- Mitigated (DNS -M). A 14 -day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS -M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: November 1, 2012 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: November 20, 2012 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Robert McNeill, earghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.; 18215 72"" Avneue S; Kent, WA 98032; Eml: bmcneill@barghausen.comf Permits/Review Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Administrative Site Plan Review, Other Permits which may be required: Building, Construction, Fire, and Sign Permits Requested Studies: Drainage Report, Geotechnical Report, and Traffic Impact Analysis Location where application may be reviewed: Department of Community & Economic Development {CED] — Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 PUBLIC HEARING: N/A If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED — Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Rainier/LUA12-095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: City/State/Zip: TELEPHONE NO.: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: The subject site is designated Commercial Corridor (CC) on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Commercial Arterial (CA) on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-2-120A and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. • The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation/impact Fee; • The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation/impact Fee; and • The applicant will be required to submit an archaeological survey that conforms to the requirements and standards of the Washington State Office of Archaeoiogy and Historic Preservation. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner, CED — Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on December 5, 2012. if you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notihcatior by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments wid automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7219; Eml: rtimmons@rentonwa,go'v PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION Denis Law Mayor CttY 0 i J(�Ll Department of Community and Economic Development November 20, 2012 C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Robert McNeill Senior Planner Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72"d Avenue S Kent, WA 98032 Subject: Notice of Complete Application Fred Meyer Fueling Station on Rainier, LUA12-095, ECF, SA -A, MOD, MOD Dear Mr. McNeill: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on December 17, 2012. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7219 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Roc e Timm As ciate Planner cc: James Coombes - Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. / Owner(s) Renton City Hall . 1055 South Grady way • Renton,Washington 98057 . rentonwa.gov Ms. Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner Department of Community and Economic Development Planning Division City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98057 CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING November 1, 2012 HAND DELIVERY p Of Rei7ton NO V ` 12012 11 v ea Re: Application for SEPA Environmental Review and Administrative Site Plan Review Fred Meyer Fuel Center at 431 South Rainier Avenue South Renton, WA 98057 (Fred Meyer Retail Center at 465 South Rainier Avenue) Fred Meyer Store No. 459 Renton Center / Our Job No. 13245.1 Dear Ms. Timmons: On behalf of our clients, Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. and The Kroger Co., Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. is submitting the required application forms, plans, and supporting documentation to initiate concurrent SEPA Environmental Review and Administrative Site Plan Review processes for the above - referenced facility. Scope of Project Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.'s proposal calls for the construction a 43- by 160 -foot fuel canopy (6,880 square feet) and an 8- by 20 -foot (160 square feet) cashier's kiosk with ADA -accessible restroom. Under the 2009 International Building Code (IBC) the canopy and kiosk would be considered Type II -B construction and categorized as a Class M Occupancy. The canopy will provide protective cover for nine (9) multi- product dispensers (MPDS), creating a fuel facility with eighteen (18) vehicle fueling positions (VFPs). The facility will also require the installation of two (2) underground storage tanks (USTs), one 20,000- galion UST for the storage of regular unleaded fuel, and one 18,000 -gallon split/dual UST (10,00018,000 gallons each) divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. Other associated site improvements include a backup generator, perimeter landscaping including various pedestrian and/or aesthetic amenities, minimal canopy signage, asphalt paving, lot lights, an air/water unit, and all required water quality/stormwater improvements and utility connections. Submittal Package In accordance with the submittal requirements for the SEPA Environmental Review Process and the Administrative Site Plan Review process, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. staff has prepared a submittal package including the following: 1. Safeway check No. 4999176 in the amount of $2,060 and a blank Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. check No. 29809 to be presented at intake covering the required fees associated with this submittal One (1) original copy of the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements reviewed October 19, 2012 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES ♦ OLYMPIA,WA ♦ CONCORD, CA ♦ TEMECULA, CA www.barghausen.00m Ms. Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner Department of Community and Economic Development Planning Division City of Renton -2- November 1, 2012 3. Five (5) copies of the Pre -Application Meeting Summary 4. Five (5) copies of the Waiver Form provided by City of Renton staff 5. Five (5) copies of a Title Report, File No. NCS-520798-OR1 as prepared by First American Title Insurance Company, National Commercial Services, dated April 9, 2012 satisfying the requirement for copies of the recorded documents referenced in said report 6. One (1) original and eleven (11) copies of the Land Use Permit Master Application Form completed, signed, and dated including a Certificate of Incumbency and Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. Assistant Secretary's Certificate 7. One (1) signed, original copy plus eleven (11) copies of the SEPA Environmental Checklist completed, signed, and dated 8. Twelve (12) copies of a Comprehensive Project Narrative 9. Five (5) copies of a Modification Narrative and Justification 10. Five (5) copies of the Design District "D" Checklist detailing the project's conformity with urban design criteria imposed on this project 11. Five (5) copies of a Construction Mitigation Narrative addressing various construction activities, operational issues, and noise abatement 12. Five (5) copies of a Geotechnical Report and Analysis prepared by The Riley Group, Bothell, Washington dated June 5, 2012 13. Two (2) copies of a Tree Retention Worksheet 14. Five (5) copies of a Project Narrative addressing landscaping, lot coverage, and parking 15. Four (4) copies of the Technical Information Report dated October 19, 2012 complying with the requirements of City of Renton Drafting Standards and the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual 16. Five (5) copies of Traffic Information and Scoping prepared by Group Mackenzie dated May 24, 2012 17. One (1) set of plan reductions at 8'/2- by 11 -inch format of all full-size plans submitted as part of this application 18. Twelve (12) copies of the following: • Sheet C4 of 8, Grading Plan 0 SheetAS1.1, Architectural Site Plan Ms. Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner Department of Community and Economic Development Planning Divlsion City of Renton -3- November 1, 2012 • Sheet EX -1, Neighborhood Detail Map 19. Five (5) copies of the following: • Sheet T1, Project Title Sheet, Index of Drawings • ALTA / ACSM Land Title Survey prepared by Owen B. Hille, P.L.S. o Sheet 1 of 2 o Sheet 2 of 2 • Civil Drawings: o Sheet C1 of 8, Cover Sheet o Sheet C2 of 8, Demolition and Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (T.E.S.C.) Plan o Sheet C3 of 8, Site Improvement Plan o Sheet C5 of 8, Storm Drainage and Utility Plan o Sheet C6 of 8, Sanitary Sewer and Water Utility Plan a Sheets C7 and C8 of 8, Construction Details • Sheet L-1, Landscape Planting Plan • Architectural Drawings: o Sheet AS1.2, Overall Site Plan o Sheets A1.0 and A1.1, Construction and Foundation Plans o Sheet A2.0, Exterior Elevations and Signage o Sheet A3.0, Yard Details 20. Four (4) copies of Sheet ST1, Significant Tree Plan 21. One (1) colored Display Map of each full-size plan required by the City of Renton for use at public presentations and committee meetings • Sheet EX -1, Neighborhood Detail Map (colored) • Sheet EX -2, Canopy Elevations (colored) • Sheet EX -3, Colored Site Plan • Sheet EX -4, Colored Landscape Plan Note: All documents and plans were prepared by Barghausen Consuiting Engineers, Inc. and are provided in 22- by 34 -inch format/folded unless otherwise noted. Ms. Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner Department of Community and Economic Development Planning Division City of Renton -4- November 1, 2012 Thank you for your prompt attention to this application. Should you have any questions, require additional documentation, or need further information, please contact me directly at via telephone at (425) 656-1061 or via email at bmcneili(a)barghausen.com. I look forward to your reply. Si ly, 717,f !'2 (-* Obert P. McNeill Senior Planner RPM/dm 13245c.010.doc enc: As Noted cc: Mr. Brian Peterson, The Kroger Co. Mr. Tim Hansen, QFC Mr. Jim Coombes, Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. Mr. Jay S. Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mr. Jason Hubbell, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mr. Chris Ferko, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. City of Renton '`Sion LAND USE PERMIT Nov _z Boz MASTER APPLICATION/�r�;,�n^ PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. c/o James Coombes, Sr Entitlements Mgr 3800 SE 22nd Avenue ADDRESS: CITY Portland OR ZIP 97202 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 503-797-5617 (Phone) 503-797-3539 (Fax) APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME. COMPANY (if applicable): ADDRESS: CITY ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER: CONTACT PERSON NAME. Robert McNeill Senior Planner COMPANY (if applicable): Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. ADDRESS: 18215 72nd Avenue S CITY Kent WA ZIP 98032 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: Direct Line: 425-656-1061 Cell: 206-396-8598 Corporate: 425-251-6222 Fax: 425-251-8782 bmcneill@barghausen.com PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECTOR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Fred Meyer Fuel Center #4591 Renton Center PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 431 S Rainier Avenue Renton WA 98057 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 0007200209 EXISTING LAND USE(S) Commercial Retail PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Commercial Retail 1 Fuel Facility EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION - Commercial Corridor 1 CC PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable) No Change Proposed EXISTING ZONING Commercial Arterial 1 CA PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): No Change Proposed SITE AREA (in square feet): tdoSF ... fuel site only SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED. None Required 1 Proposed SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: NIA PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable) NIA NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) NIA NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): NIA H',.CHI)\Data\Forms-'I'emplates',Selt=help]iandouts,Planninglmaslerapp.doc - I - 03/11 PROJECT INFORMA NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if appEicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): 6,8801 Canopy & 1201 Kiosk SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A ... Vacant NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): 7,000 SF / Fuel Canopy & Kiosk Combined NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): 1-2 per Shift 1 TBD 0 TION continued PROJECT VALUE: $ 825,600 ... estimated IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): ❑ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA NIA sq. ft. ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD N/A sq. ft. ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION NIA sq. ft. ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES NIA sq. ft. ❑ WETLANDS NIA sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Attach legal description on separate sheet with the followinu information included SITUATE IN THE SW 114 QUARTER OF SECTION 18 , TOWNSHIP 23 , RANGE 5E , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP ,.I I, (Print Namels) e t � r e �- Qj IJA00, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of 0,- ,VVa&h;Px-#QP that I am (please check one) the ent owner of the property involved in this application or _s,� the authorized Mpresentative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature of Owner/Representative Date Signature of Owner/Representative Date 0 R 6 6-QN STATE OF lhtA&HWBTeN } } SS COUNTY OF i4++G- } M u�r7ut}�+2 fi s I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that f l L u U" signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for, t e uses and purpose mentioned in the instrument. r��b� 1 Dated OFFICIAL SEAL GINGER L PULLEN NO-1"ARY PUBLIC -OREGON COMMISSION NO. 447140 MY COMM15510!1 "r_XPIRFS MARCH 25, 2014 Notary Public !n nd for the State of Washington /I 7 Notary (Print): I �L c� Y My appointment expires: i1� �rCc �} H:10ED\Data\Forms-Templates\Sell=llelp l landQLILS'.Planning\masterapp.doc - _ - 03/l l LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Attach legal description on separate sheet with the followinu information included SITUATE IN THE SW 114 QUARTER OF SECTION 18 , TOWNSHIP 23 , RANGE 5E , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP ,.I I, (Print Namels) e t � r e �- Qj IJA00, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of 0,- ,VVa&h;Px-#QP that I am (please check one) the ent owner of the property involved in this application or _s,� the authorized Mpresentative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature of Owner/Representative Date Signature of Owner/Representative Date 0 R 6 6-QN STATE OF lhtA&HWBTeN } } SS COUNTY OF i4++G- } M u�r7ut}�+2 fi s I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that f l L u U" signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for, t e uses and purpose mentioned in the instrument. r��b� 1 Dated OFFICIAL SEAL GINGER L PULLEN NO-1"ARY PUBLIC -OREGON COMMISSION NO. 447140 MY COMM15510!1 "r_XPIRFS MARCH 25, 2014 Notary Public !n nd for the State of Washington /I 7 Notary (Print): I �L c� Y My appointment expires: i1� �rCc �} H:10ED\Data\Forms-Templates\Sell=llelp l landQLILS'.Planning\masterapp.doc - _ - 03/l l FRED MEYER STORES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF INCUMBENCY The undersigned hereby certifies thathe is the Assistant Secretary of Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., an Ohio corporation (the "Company"), and that the following persons hold the position set forth opposite his/her name below: President Michael L. Ellis Senior VP & Chief Financial Officer David Deatherage Executive Vice President Lynn T. Gust Vice President Robert Currey -Wilson Vice President & Assistant Treasurer James C, Aalberg The undersigned further certifies that the signature of the person set forth below is the true and genuine signature of such person; Name Position Signature Michael L. Ellis President David Deatherage Lynn T. Gust Robert Currey -Wilson Senior VP & Chief Financial Officer Executive Vice President Vice President --___2 James C. Aalberg Vice President &Ass ant Treasurer -----= IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed and delivered this Certificate of Incumbency on this �1 day of August, 2006. Nona M. Soltero, Assistant Secretary FRED MEYER STORES, INC. ASSISTANT SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATE I, Nona M. Soltero, Vice President & Assistant Secretary of Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Ohio (the "Company"), do hereby certify that the following is a true and exact copy of certain resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company through an action by unanimous written consent dated as of March 8, 2012; and I further certify that these resolutions have not beer. amended, modified or rescinded and remain in full force and effect: RESOLVED, That any of the following persons be, and they hereby are, authorized for and on behalf of the Company to sell or transfer real property, and to execute and deliver deeds and any other documents necessary or incident thereto where the consideration for any such sale or transfer does not exceed the sum of Fifty Million Dollars ($50,000,000) in the aggregate in one transaction, to wit: the President, any Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President, any other elected Vice President, and any other person duly authorized by the President; and that the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary may impress thereon the seal of the Company and attest the execution of such deeds or other documents, and be it further RESOLVED, That any one of the aforementioned persons be, and each hereby is, authorized for and on behalf of the Company to contract for the purchase by the Company of real property, and to execute and deliver any documents necessary or incident to such purchase where the consideration for any one such purchase does not exceed the sum of Fifty Million Dollars ($50,000,000); and that the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary may impress thereon the seal of the Company and attest the execution of such contracts or other documents, and be it further RESOLVED, That any one of the aforementioned persons be, and each hereby is, authorized for and on behalf of the Company to acquire equipment, real property, leasehold interests in real property and other interests relating to the Company's operations and to execute and deliver documents necessary or appropriate in connection with such acquisition, where the aggregate consideration for any transaction or series of related transactions does not exceed Fifty Million Dollars ($5o,000,000); and be if further RESOLVED, That any one of the aforementioned persons be, and each hereby is, authorized for and on behalf of the Company to execute all documents related to the disposition of Company interests by leasing, subleasing or assigning of leases, for real property used or acquired by the Company in connection with its operations where the aggregate Q:1CLD\GLPTo=\FMS1 REAL ESTATE RP_SOUfTTON (6).Dw consideration for any transaction or series of related transactions does not exceed Fifty Million Dollars ($5o,000,000); and be it further RESOLVED, That any one of the aforementioned persons be, and each hereby is, authorized for and on behalf of the Company, to grant easements, right-of-way dedications and such other instruments necessary for the partitioning and/or development of the real property of the Company; and be it further RESOLVED, That any one of the aforementioned persons be, and each hereby is, authorized for and on behalf of the Company, to execute all documents necessary in such officer's judgment, to enter into one or more partnerships or limited liability companies for the purpose of purchasing, owning, leasing, developing and selling real property, and be it further RESOLVED, That any one of the aforementioned persons be, and each hereby is, authorized to execute such documents as may be deemed necessary, desirable or appropriate, in such officer's judgment, in the business operation of any such partnership or limited liability company, on behalf of the Company as a partner or member, as the case may be, including, but not limited to, guaranty or loan participation agreements and loan documents for construction loans and permanent loans, provided that all loans for any one property do not exceed the sum of Fifty Million Dollars ($50,000,000) in the aggregate, and be it further RESOLVED, That any one of the aforementioned persons be, and each hereby is, authorized to guarantee in the name of and on behalf of the Company any lease or other obligation incurred in the ordinary course of business by any wholly-owned subsidiary or any other corporation or business entity in which the Company holds at least a 20% ownership interest, whether through voting stock, or otherwise, and be it further RESOLVED, That any one of the aforementioned persons be, and each hereby is, authorized to guarantee in the name of and on behalf of the Company any obligation of any third party when such guaranty is deemed necessary or desirable in the furtherance of the Company's business interests, provided that the obligations guaranteed on behalf of such third party do not exceed the sum of Fifty Million Dollars ($50,000,000), and be it further RESOLVED, That any one of the aforementioned persons be, and each hereby is, authorized in the name of and on behalf of the Company to make a loan to any third party when such loan is deemed necessary or desirable in the furtherance of the Company's business interests, QACLD\GLPTPo=\rNBI REAL. ESTATE RESOLUTION provided that the amount of such loan does not exceed the sum of Fifty Million Dollars ($50,000,000). These resolutions are in substitution for similar resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors at its regular meeting on April 20, 2007. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal of said Company on the 25th day of Mune, 2012. Nona M. Soltero Vice President & Assistant Secretary Q:1CLMGLFT0rmS FMS1 RE-kL ESTATE RESOLLMON (6).Doc PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS 0 e140 NOV 00", #006 Calculations, Construction Mitligation Description 2AN04 Density Worksheet 4 Drainage Report 2 Environmental Checklist 4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 :T, Floor Plans 3 AND 4 Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 NA, Habitat Data Report 4 i% Irrigation Plan 4 Landscape Plan, Gor"PtUa14 ii - Legal Description 4; Master Application Fom14 Neighborhood Detail Map 4 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 401" This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services PROJECT NAME: 2. Public Works Plan Review 3, Building DATE: 4. Planning H:1GEDIDalalForms-TenVIateskSelf-Help Handi)utsTienMnglwaiveroisubmitistreqs.xis 066 PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services 2, Public Works Plan Review 3. Building 4. Planning PROJECT NAME: r-MC14^1i 5 DATE: H:SCEDV)ata\Forms-TemplatestSelf-Help Handouls\Planning\waiverofsubmiltaireqs.xls Dam illyn Plat Name Reservation 4 Public Works Approval Letters Screening Detaill 4 17 Stream or Lake Study, Standard 4 iii Stream or Lake Mitigation Plan 4 Tide Report or Plat Certlfcate 4 Traffic Study 2 1 14 Urban Design Regulations Analysis Wetlands Mftatlon Plan, Final 4 Wetlands Report/Delineation 4 NO -10 -i-11" T: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2AN03 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2AN03 Map of View Area 2 AND 3 Photos im ulationS 2AN03 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services 2, Public Works Plan Review 3. Building 4. Planning PROJECT NAME: r-MC14^1i 5 DATE: H:SCEDV)ata\Forms-TemplatestSelf-Help Handouls\Planning\waiverofsubmiltaireqs.xls Dam Fred Meyer Fuel - #459 Renton Center PLANNING DIVISION DESIGN DISTRICT "D "'CHECKLIST City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: 1`f� I:,fvis!ot NOV - 1101; Ensure compliance with design review regulations located in the Renton Municipal Code in order to: a. Maintain and protect property values; b. Enhance the general appearance of the City; c. Encourage creativity in building and site design; d. Achieve predictability, balanced with flexibility; and e. Consider the individual merits of proposals. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This design district checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The City will use this checklist to determine whether the proposal complies with the Urban Design Regulations in the Renton Municipal Code (RMC 4-3-100). There are two categories that have been established: (a) "minimum standards" that must be met, and (b) "guidelines" that, while not mandatory, are considered by the Planning Director in determining if the proposed action meets the intent of the design guidelines if the standard cannot be met. Please describe how your proposal meets each standard. if you are not able to meet the standard, please describe how the proposal meets the intent and guidelines of the applicable section. If a question does not apply to your proposal, write "does not apply". Complete answers may avoid unnecessary delays in the processing of your review_ iti3N_ _= __ Bu�ml+toe�itit�nOrieniatrdrt T Intra- _nr��iy#usrnes�ndQ�sSailish active, lively u ds- -a de Phan pat ivyays To organ ze�u�ld�ngs for peshisOvaa o = [ 3tr Gtc�res��i�open ace 7o:ensure an apprap-ietP-ttinsition !Se_t_weeW-1su3idL4-s kik g -16d at arrd eatkaC_uses Guidelines: Developments shall enhance the mutual relationship of buildings with each other, as -well -as - With the road s,.open 5pace;.and pedestrian amenities while working to create a'pedestrian oriented -ehvironmesit-Abts-s -all be cpnfi used to_enca_urdge variety ar�d`so :that natural iight;i5 Vailable:to g 'bulldi . s and o en spaceJhe riyacy of lndividvals in residential-uses shall be provided for:.- - - Standard: The availability of natural light (both direct and reflected) and direct sun exposure to nearby buildings and open sace (except parking areas) shall be considered when siting structures. The fuel canopy design and site placement allows for full visual continuity; allowing sunlight to diffuse beneath the canopy while maintaining or increasing existing levels of solar exposure for adjacent properties. A perimeter landscaping buffer on three sides receives maximum exposure while minimizing interference with adjacent properties. Standard: (Buildings shall be oriented to the street with clear connections to the sidewalk. The project is designed with access to the fuel canopy oriented towards the Rainier Avenue frontage, while maintaining access rom the Fred Meyer parking field. The automotive nature of the use dictates that pedestrian access to the fuel canopy be iscouraged as a matter of public safety; however connections are maintained along the perimeter. Standard: The front entry of a building shall be oriented to the street or a landscaped pedestrian-only courtyard. The vehicular entry is oriented to provide access from public and private rights-of-way, without creating interference with ingresslegress or blocking access to parking areas. Pedestrian access is channeled along the perimeter, on three sides, and around vehicle maneuvering areas. Standard: Buildings with residential uses located at the street level shall be set back from the sidewalk a minimum of ten feet (10') and feature substantial landscaping between the sidewalk and the building or Have the ground floor residential uses raised above street level for residents' privacy. Not Applicable r U� r t sir t t 5u _ Ute_ WWIa ur = W . it _ - i - e':pt - - -_ _.. Guldlines._Prirr:ary entries shah #ace-the street,serve as-a foca.E_pointr:and allows acearsociai e _ _ r)tera4t an iN:enlr e s all include features khat make them ea$ily idLntifilble-wnl) deflecting the architectural characterafthe build ing Tlie:pTitp entryshall-be the most vfsua ly iro inept entry -Pedestrian access to the building fro-_ d -and ski li-enhance the overall quality of_ the :pedestria experience-on-the site. Standard: A primary entrance of each building shall be located on the facade facing a street, shall be prominent, visible from the street, connected by a walkway to the public sidewalk, and include human- scale elements. The fuel canopy "entrances" are oriented towards the access driveways - serving the site's customers; a typical building entry does not exist - aside from the employee entrance to the kiosk. Standard: A primary entrance of each building shall be made visibly prominent by incorporating architectural features such as a facade overhang, trellis, large entry doors, and/or ornamental lighting. The fuel canopy is the predominant architectural feature onsite; vehicular entrances are well defined and pedestrian access channeled to the sidewalks along the perimeter and adjacent Rainier Avenue frontage. Green screens within the landscape buffer and paved public spaces provide human-scale and aesthetic features in lieu of architectural embellishments. Standard Building entries from a street shall be clearly marked with canopies, architectural elements, ornamental lighting, or landscaping and include weather protection at least four and one-half feet (4- 1/2') wide (illustration below). Buildings that are taller than thirty feet (30') in height shall also ensure that the weather protection is proportional to the distance above ground level. Not Applicable ... entries from the street are provided for vehicles at clearly defined pump islands ... weather protection is Standard: Building entries from a parking Eat shall be subordinate to those related to the street. The entry doors to the kiosk and to the rest room (employees only to kiosk; limited customer access to rest room) are subordinate in nature to the primary automotive entries. Standard: Features such as entries, lobbies, and display windows shall be oriented to a street or pedestrian-oriented space; otherwise, screening or decorative features should be incorporated. The kiosk windows are oriented to provide required visual surveillance of the fuel islands, but do retain visibility of the kiosk interior from the right-of-way for security purposes. Standard: Multiple buildings on the same site shall direct views to building entries by providing a continuous network of pedestrian paths and open spaces that incorporate landscaping. Not Applicable-, only a single operational structure (canopy and kiosk) will occupy the fuel area. Standard: Ground floor residential units that are directly accessible from the street shall include entries from front yards to provide transition space from the street or entries from an open space such as a courtyard or garden that is accessible from the street. Not Applicable, no residential element is present. Transitional elements are addressed through the installation of screening within the perimeter landscaping, serving as a visual screen separating the canopy/kiosk from the right-of-way. Midi _ uf�4it d -gLk b'rfent — — - 7ntteIlt � sh p ed ve]0pr ent ecf�so=th t� 7 cfera d atU. zcist�ng-if eighfgrhaods are preserve - — Guidel€nes: Careful siting. and design treatment shall be-used to:achieve a compatible transition where .new Buildings differ from surrounding deyelopment in terms of building height, bulk and scale. Standard: At least one of the following design elements shall be used to promote a transition to surrounding uses: 1) Building proportions, including step-backs on upper levels in accordance with the surrounding planned and existing land use forms; or Z) Building articulation to divide a larger architectural element into smaller increments; or 3) Roof lines, roof pitches, and roof shapes designed to reduce apparent bulk and transition with existing development. Additionally, the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee may require increased setbacks at the side or rear of a building in order to reduce the bulk and scale of larger buildings and/or so that sunlight reaches adjacent and/or abutting yards. Fuel canopy design limitations somewhat restrict the use of articulation or modulation on a fuel canopy-. the submitted roof lineipitch correlates well with those of surrounding structures, to the extent they are visible from the project site. Alternatives were evaluated by corporate personnel and selected choice incorporates architectural features deemed acceptable by staff. `lei#ent 7o_redue�tF�e--potential pteagive�Xnpacts_nfeeem6n��._waste receptcleJoad�ng__ dock} by_toeg ityg service and=laad�-areesaway from M psjaan,�r a �:attcl cue n g_tt3eoz r�trj at e + i'n t her-J �sl6ilit. Guidelines: Service elements shall be.:concentrated and located so that impacts to pedestrians and other. abutting uses are minimized. The impacts of service elements shall be mitigated with landscaping and an encEosure with fencing-that is made'of quality materials Standard: Service elements shall be located and designed to minimize the impacts on the pedestrian environment and adjacent and/or abutting uses. Service elements shall be concentrated and located where they are accessible to service vehicles and convenient for tenant use. Service elements (backup generator) have been relegated to the SW comer of the site, and enclosed or screened from view; minimizing visual observation from rights-of-way and maneuvering areas, while retaining full functionality. Our proposal currently calls for the use of shared refusetrecycling facilities with the adjacent Fred Meyer store - similar to Benson Plaza. Standard: In addition to standard enclosure requirements, garbage, recycling collection, and utility areas shall be enclosed on all sides, including the roof and screened around their perimeter by a wall or fence and have self-closing doors_ The nature and size of the facilities is minimized; enclosure and screening is provided. Standard: Service enclosures shall be made of masonry, ornamental metal or wood, or some combination of the three (3). Our generator enclosure will either consist of CMU block or use chain link fence wlprivacy slats, in accordance with city design preference. Standard: If the service area is adjacent to a street, pathway, or pedestrian -oriented space, a landscaped planting strip, minimum three feet (3') wide, shall be located on three (3) sides of such facility. The generator pad is immediately adjacent to a sidewalk from Rainier Avenue; the existing configuration of the site provides for landscaping on two of the four sides. Placement of additional planting would intrude into the necessary maneuvering area required for the fuel facility. HMS 1�nnt _fotirsngctts g r,r�r� ity; specinl dsis 101WWW C�ectural�� ntQaaffi Vs --S Id b Tovid vYa l h_ould 6e 31 _.— '1texof thedfs uld .also, be corgi ablh tract and! Guidelines: Development -that occurs at gateways should -be distinguWi6d with features that visually Indicate to both pedestrians and vehicular traffic the uniqueness and prominence of -their locations -in the City. Examples of.these typespf features include monuments, public art, and public -plazas. - Standard: Developments located at district gateways shall be marked with visually prominent features. Not Applicable; but pedestrian amenities have been provided where possible, including within paved public spaces located at prominent locations along the Rainier Avenue frontage. Standard: Gateway elements shall be oriented toward and scaled for both pedestrians and vehicles. Not Applicable. Standard: Visual prominence shall be distinguished by two (2) or more of the following: 1) Public a pecial landscape treatmen , ens ace/plaza; 4) Landmark building form; S ectal avi nique pedestrian scale ligh ar bollards 5) Prominent architectural featu trellis or, pergola, or gazebo); 7) Neighborhood or district entry identification (commercial signs do not qualify). White not a gateway, certain features have been provided, as noted above; sidewalks are provided on 3 sides of facility. IL r eiif#1vf�Infx�en[ f? - --- 5urf�ce Parkini=_ Intent: di m- ht6in acove stf+an Toriments aloel st- - IMM_ oto CI 3aCt(y3y bac f.--_r ---- Guidelines: Surface parking-shall be located and designed so-as to reduce-the visual impact of the-- - - -- parking area and associated vehicles. Large areas of surface perking shall_also be designed to =. . .accommodate future infifl development:. --- Standard: Parking shall be located so that no surface parking is located between a building and the front property line, or the building and side property line, on the street side of a corner lot. Parking for the employees will be provided within the existing parking field, immediately W of the proposed facility. Standard: Parking shall be located so that it is screened from surrounding streets by buildings, landscaping, and/or gateway features as dictated by location. The existing parking field is several hundred feet away from surrounding streets; perimeter landscaping will provide a limited degree of screening from adjacent public rights-of-way. Landscaping is also used to screen adjacent blank walls tfiIGtLlyed-, -ar� kinR� — f ten t `o o n-6t�f �soi i#ic t use s}f lar s d u i t le— ng g =$ —= —� s riicttfn -- ud visual ntd -at i �-ot L Avera Irripacc' a q Guidelines: Parking garages shall not dominate thestre' ksca;pc; they shall be desigriedi to be - compler a'ntary with adjacent and-abutting buildings They_shall'be sited to complement, not subordinate, pedestria'rn-entries::Similar forms, materials, acid/or details to the primary building(s) should be used to enhance garages.- Standard: Parking structures shall provide space for ground floor commercial uses along street frontages at a minimum of seventy five percent (75%) of the building frontage width. Not Applicable Standard: The entire facade must feature a pedestrian-oriented facade. The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development may approve parking structures that do not feature a pedestrian orientation in limited circumstances. If allowed, the structure shall be set back at least six feet (6') from the sidewalk and feature substantial landscaping. This landscaping shall include a combination of evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs, and ground cover. This setback shall be increased to ten feet (10') when abutting a primary arterial and/or minor arterial. Not Applicable ... a pedestrian orientation is counter to the automotive nature of the proposed use; the setback provided is necessary for the adequate queuing of customer vehicles. Standard: Public facing facades shall be articulated by arches, lintels, masonry trim, or other architectural elements and/or materials. Not Applicable Standard: The entry to the parking garage shall be located away from the primary street, to either the side or rear of the building. Not Applicable ... entry to the parking area serving adjacent uses is provided at the rear of the facility-, allowing customers adequate ingresslegress between fuel facility, parking and adjacent uses. Standard: Parking garages at grade shall include screening or be enclosed from view with treatment such as walls, decorative grilles, trellis with landscaping, or a combination of treatments. Not Applicable; perimeter landscaping and screens serve a similar function, albeit not directly connected to a facade. Standard: The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee may allow a reduced setback where the applicant can successfully demonstrate that the landscaped area and/or other design treatment meets the intent of these standards and guidelines. Possible treatments to reduce the setback include landscaping components plus one or more of the following integrated with the architectural design of the building: i) Ornamental grillwork (other than vertical bars); 2) Decorative artwork; 3) Display windows; 4) Brick, tile, or stone; 5) Pre -cast decorative panels; 6) Vine -covered trellis; 7) Raised landscaping beds with decorative materials; or 8) Other treatments that meet the intent of this standard. Not Applicable ... a reduced setback is not being sought; the setback is being exceeded and is offset by the use/provision of pedestrian amenities such as landscaped pathways, open/paved public areas, benches, lighted bollards & landscaped screens. Intent,T rn_ ntarn, �iQuSand.un�nterrU tel ei�valkl3 rrsTn7 v - - --- __ =eliminati- vehi-ular- ffstres Guidellnes: Vehicular access to parking garages and parking lots shall not impede or intern pt pedestrian mobility: The impacts of curb cuts to pedestrian access.onsidewalks_shall be minimized --- Standard: Access to parking lots and garages shall be from alleys, when available. If not available, access shall occur at side streets. Driveway access is provided at two locations; one directly from the Rainier Avenue right-of-way; the other from the shopping center's main driveway, just N of the facility. The adjacent parking area is directly accessible from the rear of the facility, Standard: The number of driveways and curb cuts shall be minimized, so that pedestrian circulation along the sidewalk is minimally impeded. No new curb cuts are proposed; the single driveway access from Rainier is currently existing and has minimal impact on pedestrian circulation. =MtenMMMY-04M- �i�li -- yeittt �Tk—T—sa►a#`.�i1+i[iLi itn _ _ � r�►u = a�cTl�gI� � ��use���u��-trt��L=��tiii Intencreae a newa`c oflnkages for pedesfriarts,_thak-js safnd convenent,EPiTiartcesE LL _ =- - peti r r epvits --n d-provides a way for pede�fi'l�rrM walkfrot� tafn� tiont_a�r�#�r w1t3 hay in`tofciv�t�eir-vehiUe- Guidelines: The pedestrian environmentshall be glvimprjaity and importance in the de-sign-of projects. - -. Sidewalks and/or pathways shall.be provided and shall provide safe access to buildings from parking areas.. Providing pedestrian connections to abutting properties is an important aspect of connectivity - andencourages pedestrian activity and shall be considered. Pathways.shall be easily identifiable to -- pedestrians and drivers - Standard: A pedestrian circulation system of pathways that are clearly delineated and connect buildings, open space, and parking areas with the sidewalk system and abutting properties shall be provided. a. Pathways shall be located so that there are clear sight lines, to increase safety. b. Pathways shall bean all-weather or permeable walking surface, unless the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed surface is appropriate for the anticipated number of users and complementary to the design of the development. Pedestrian access through maneuvering areas of a fuel station is discouraged. Pedestrian access to the site is channeled around the site's perimeter, where sidewalks are provided with clear lines of site and appropriate screening of use. Standard: Pathways within parking areas shall be provided and differentiated by material or texture (i.e., raised walkway, stamped concrete, or pavers) from abutting paving materials. Permeable materials are encouraged. The pathways shall be perpendicular to the applicable building facade and no greater than one hundred frit feet (15V) apart. Separate, dedicated parking areas are not utilized; pedestrian paths used by fuel customers to access the kiosk, are marked beneath the fuel canopy - see architectural details. Existing pedestrian paths are incorporated into the landscaping design. Standard: Sidewalks and pathways along the facades of buildings shall be of sufficient width to accommodate anticipated numbers of users. Specifically: a. Sidewalks and pathways along the facades of mixed use and retail buildings one hundred (loo) or more feet in width (measured along the facade) shall provide sidewalks at least twelve feet (12') in width. The pathway shall include an eight-foot (8') minimum unobstructed walking surface. b. Interior pathways shall be provided and shall vary in width to establish a hierarchy. The widths shall be based on the intended number of users; to be no smaller than five feet (5') and no greater than twelve feet (12'). Not Applicable; no pathways are located along fuel canopy facades. Pedestrian paths are delineated beneath the canopy to provide for customer safety as they approach the kiosk. Standard: Mid-block connections between buildings shall be provided. Not Applicable ... a "mid-block" connection is provided from the Rainier Avenue frontage to the fi=red Meyer parking area. eilesiHannimenii�e3 - -- — - - -- - -_ Intent:7o;cre5Ie4_ dI spaces that unify the building. _ €env_nr �nfsart r i ttln camforfableforped_ntr�vidpublielyaccess�blaarshatfunGot�tet�►ttrr -_. -round activ—lt� iride_r"tyAcl soon. al weather_coniiltfvlr, — - Guidelines: The pedesudan enviranment shall be given priority:and importance in the design of projects.- Amenities that encourage pedestrian use and enhance the pedestrian experience shall be included. Standard: Architectural elements that incorporate plants, particularly at building entrances, in publicly accessible spaces and at facades along streets, shall be provided. Lacking an entry for pedestrians on the streets, the facility provides improvements along the frontage and makes every possible effort, given the site constraints, to provide adequate landscaping separating the use, both functionally and visually. Standard: Amenities such as outdoor group seating, benches, transit shelters, fountains, and public art shall be provided. a. Site furniture shall be made of durable, vandal- and weather -resistant materials that do not retain rainwater and can be reasonably maintained over an extended period of time. b. Site furniture and amenities shall not impede or block pedestrian access to public spaces or building entrances. Lacking a pedestrian plaza or delineated pathways, such amenities are provided where possible. The placement of specific amenities (benches, bollards, etc.) is intended to promote pedestrian use and provide adequate separation and security. Standard: Pedestrian overhead weather protection in the form of awnings, marquees, canopies, or building overhangs shall be provided. These elements shall be a minimum of four and one-half feet (4- 2/2') wide along at least seventy five percent (75%) of the length of the building facade facing the street, a maximum height of fifteen feet (15') above the ground elevation, and no lower than eight feet (8) above ground level. None provided; not applicable. The fuel canopy provides weather protection for customers at the pump islands or kiosk. _ nRIM Vem lit �4 t v ilafiT Leaser M tL[t _zif ._.._n._tivetiiP - -- - _ otatian. . alt s e _ _ _� a cce` a = ul<s��c C1 mite== tis. -° ; icIi=r`.__- Guidelines: -Developments'located at street intersections should provide pedestrian -oriented space at the street corner to emphasize pedestrian activity (illustration below). Recreation Arad common open space areas are. integral aspects of quality development that encourage pedestrians and users. These areas shall be provided in an amount that is adequate to be functional and usable; they shall also be landscaped and located so that they are appealing to users and. pedestrians.- _ Standard: All mixed use residential and attached housing developments of ten (10) or more dwelling units shall provide common opens space and/or recreation areas. Not Applicable .._.......... - Standard: Amount of common space or recreation area to be provided: at minimum fifty (50) square feet per unit. Not Applicable Standard: The location, layout, and proposed type of common space or recreation area shall be subject to approval by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee. K— A....I:.... 4.1,. rvt -F'F Iwulc Standard: At least one of the following shall be provided in each open space and/or recreation area (the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee may require more than one of the following elements for developments having more than one hundred (100) units): 1) Courtyards, plazas, or multi-purpose open spaces; 2) Upper level common decks, patios, terraces, or roof gardens/pea-patches. Such spaces above the street level must feature views or amenities that are unique to the site and are provided as an asset to the development; 3) Pedestrian corridors dedicated to passive recreation and separate from the public street system; 4) Recreation facilities including, but not limited to, tennis/sports courts, swimming pools, exercise areas, game rooms, or other similar facilities; or 5) Children's play spaces that are centrally located near a majority of dwelling units and visible from surrounding units. They shall also be located away from hazardous areas such as garbage dumpsters, drainage facilities, and parking areas. Not Applicable Standard: The following shall not be counted toward the common open space or recreation area requirement: 1) Required landscaping, driveways, parking, or other vehicular use areas; 2) Required yard setback areas. Except for areas that are developed as private or semi -private (from abutting or adjacent properties) courtyards, plazas or passive use areas containing landscaping and fencing sufficient to create a fully usable area accessible to all residents of the development; 3) Private decks, balconies, and private ground floor open space; and 4) Other required landscaping and sensitive area buffers without common access links, such as pedestrian trails. Not Applicable Standard: All buildings and developments with over thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of nonresidential uses (excludes parking garage floorplate areas) shall provide pedestrian -oriented space. Not Applicable Standard: All buildings and developments with over thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of nonresidential uses (excludes parking garage floorplate areas) shall provide pedestrian -oriented space. Not Applicable Standard: The pedestrian -oriented space for buildings and developments with over thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of nonresidential uses shall include all of the following: 1) Visual and pedestrian access (including barrier -free access) to the abutting structures from the public right-of-way or a nonvehicular courtyard; and 2) Paved walking surfaces of either concrete or approved unit paving; and 3) On-site or building -mounted lighting providing at least four (4) foot -candies (average) on the ground; and 4) At least three (3) lineal feet of seating area (bench, ledge, etc.) or one individual seat per sixty (60) square feet of plaza area or open space. Not Applicable Standard: The following areas shall not count as pedestrian -oriented space for buildings and developments with over thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of nonresidential uses: 1) The minimum required walkway. However, where walkways are widened or enhanced beyond minimum requirements, the area may count as pedestrian -oriented space if the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee determines such space meets the definition of pedestrian -oriented space. 2) Areas that abut landscaped parking lots, chain link fences, blank walls, and/or dumpsters or service areas_ Not Applicable Standard: Outdoor storage (shopping carts, potting soil bags, firewood, etc.) is prohibited within pedestrian -oriented soace. Project complies; no outdoor storage is specified. Standard: At each corner of the intersections listed below, a public plaza shall be provided: 1) Benson Area: Benson Drive S./108th Avenue S.E. and S.E. 176". 2) Bronson Area: Intersections with Bronson Way North at: a) Factory Avenue N./Houser Way S.; b) Garden Avenue N.; and c) Park Avenue N. and N. First Street. 3) Cascade Area: Intersection of 116th Avenue S.E. and S.E. 168th Street. 4) Northeast Fourth Area: Intersections with N.E. Fourth at: a) Duvall Avenue N -E.; b) Monroe Avenue N.E.; and c) Union Avenue N.E. 5) Grady Area: Intersections with Grady Way at: a) Lind Avenue S.W.; b) Rainier Avenue S.; c) Shattuck Avenue S.; and d) Talbot Road S. 6) Puget Area: Intersection of S. Puget Drive and Benson Road S. 7) Rainier Avenue Area: Intersections with Rainier Avenue S. at: a) Airport Way/Renton Avenue S.; b) S. Third Street/S.W. Sunset Boulevard; c) S. Fourth Street; and d) S. Seventh Street. 8) North Renton Area: Intersections with Park Avenue N. at: a) N. Fourth Street; and b) N. Fifth Street. 9) Northeast Sunset Area: Intersections with N.E. Sunset Boulevard at. a) Duvall Avenue N.E., and b) Union Avenue N.E. Not Applicable. Standard: The public plaza shall measure no less than one thousand (1,000) square feet with a minimum dimension of twenty feet (20') on one side abutting the sidewalk. Not Applicable; however approximately 760 SF of paved public space is provided between two locations. Standard: The public plaza must be landscaped consistent with RMC 4-4-070, including at minimum street trees, decorative paving, pedestrian -scaled lighting, and seating. Not Applicable ... however paved public areas provide benches and pedestrian -scale lighting where possible.. Guidelines: Building facades Shall be modulated and/or articulated to reduce -the apparent -size of - buildings, break up 16q,blank walls, add visual interest, and enhOice"the,pbaracter ofthe -neighborhood. Articulation; modulation, n.d.:their intervals. should create a -sense of scale rrnporta nt to residettitiat.build n s. _ -- ._ - Standard: All building facades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no more than forty feet (40'). The design of the fuel canopy provides visual modulations through the use of color. Negotiation between staff and Fred Meyer representatives produced a roof/canopy design which has been implemented at this site as well. Standard: Modulations shall be a minimum of two feet (2') deep, sixteen feet (16') in height, and eight feet (9') in width. The functional, simplified design of a fuel canopy is dictated by the need for consistently focused, diffused lighting, directed downwards, towards fueling positions, while maintaining maneuvering area. Modulation alternatives are therefore limited. Standard: Buildings greater than one hundred sixty feet (160') in length shall provide a variety of modulations and articulations to reduce the apparent bulk and scale of the facade (illustration in District B, below); or provide an additional special feature such as a clock tower, courtyard, fountain, or public gathering area. Not Applicable ... paved public spaces have been provided along the perimeter of the site in two locations; placement of these amenities immediately adjacent to the structure is not desirable or possible, given the automotive nature of the use Guidelines; The use of material variations such as colors, brick, shIhgles,stucco, and horizontal:wood - siding is encouraged. The primary building entrance should-be made vtsib)ypriiminent by incarporatiii$ , __- architectural features succi-aasoverhang,.trellis, large entry-doors andfor ornamental fighting--- (illustration below): Detail features'should also be used, to.include.t sings-such-as,decorative entry__. paving, street furniture benches, etc. , and/or. ublic art.. - - - - Standard: Human-scaled elements such as a lighting fixture, trellis, or other landscape feature shall be provided along the facade's ground floor. Not Applicable ... landscaping and architectural elements (screens) have been provided along the perimeter, in lieu of locating similar features atlon the facade. Standard: On any facade visible to the public, transparent windows and/or doors are required to comprise at least fifty percent (50%) of the portion of the ground floor facade that is between four feet (4') and eight feet (8') above ground (as measured on the true elevation). Klosk is compliant along front and side walls (partial), but fuel canopy itself lacks doors or windows; eliminating any possibility of compliance. The openness of the canopy should suffice for compliance purposes. Standard: Upper portions of building facades shall have clear windows with visibility into and out of the building. However, screening may be applied to provide shade and energy efficiency. The minimum amount of light transmittance for windows shall be fifty percent (50%). Not Applicable; no upper facade exists. Standard: Display windows shall be designed for frequent change of merchandise, rather than permanent displays. Not Applicable Standard: Where windows or storefronts occur, they must principally contain clear glazing. Compliant (kiosk windows). Standard: Tinted and dark glass, highly reflective (mirror-type) glass and film are prohibited. Compliant (kiosk windows), Standard: untreated blank walls visible from public streets, sidewalks, or interior pedestrian pathways are prohibited. 1) A wall (including building facades and retaining walls) is considered a blank wall if: a) It is a ground floor wall or portion of a ground floor wall over six feet (W) in height, has a horizontal length greater than fifteen feet (15'), and does not include a window, door, building modulation or other architectural detailing; or b) Any portion of a ground floor wall has a surface area of four hundred (400) square feet or greater and does not include a window, door, building modulation or other architectural detailing. Not Applicable; there are no such walls in our proposal. However the demolition created a viewable blank wall along an adjacent structure which has been screened by landscaping along the SISE perimeter. Standard: If blank walls are required or unavoidable, they shall be treated. The treatment Shall be proportional to the wall and use one or more of the following: 1) A planting bed at least five feet (5') in width containing trees, shrubs, evergreen ground cover, or vines abutting the blank wall; 2) Trellis or other vine supports with evergreen climbing vines; 3) Architectural detailing such as reveals, contrasting materials, or other special detailing that meets the intent of this standard; 4) Artwork, such as bas-relief sculpture, mural, or similar; or 5) Seating area with special paving and seasonal planting. -.BuildiKkFfoaf-Eines Intento ensure tfia#roof#o�ms provide disfinctive profiles and intrestcon3itertt wtthori urban - - - - = -- pro]ect otic# coh-tribtite to h Vrsuaf_cont+miry Q the district__ Guidelines: Building roof lines shall be varied and include architectural elements to.add visual interest to the building. _ - Standard: At least one of the following elements shall be used to create varied and interesting roof profiles: 1) Extended parapets; 2) Feature elements projecting above parapets; 3) Projected cornice itched or sloped roofs. Roof mounted mechanical equipment shall not be visible to edes 6) Buildings containing pre ominan y rest en is uses s all have pitched roofs with a minimum slope of one to four (1:4) and shall have dormers or interesting roof forms that break up the massiveness of an uninterrupted sloping roof. Selected design alternative provides a mansard roof on the fuel canopy. Equipment on roof of kiosk will be fully screened using a color -coordinated wall. - I>tfertt Ta ensurehi Fonda sof .guaOty and effective maiftit ante over tEme-end encourage the ase_= = re - _ _ materials that reducitheyisual bulfc of large 6uiiings,swells toertcoilrage thesaf materaafs -Eihat add �isua2'inb-rest-t44be Reigliborhaod - - - - - Guidelines: Building materials are an important and integral part of the architectural design of a building that is attractive and of high quality. Material variation shall be usedtocreate visual appeal and eliminate monotony of facades. This shall occur on all facades in a consistent manner. High quality materials shall be used. If materials like concrete or block walls are..used they shall be enhanced to create variation and enhance -their visual appeal. - Standard: All sides of buildings visible from a street, pathway, parking area, or open space shall be finished with the same building materials, detailing, and color scheme. A different treatment may be used if the materials are of the same quality. Compliant Standard: All buildings shall use material variations such as colors, brick or metal banding, patterns or textural changes. Compliant Standard: Materials shall be durable, high quality, and consistent with more traditional urban development, such as brick, integrally colored concrete masonry, pre-finished metal, stone, steel, glass and cast-in-place concrete. Compliant; materials used include textured concrete masonry block, pre-finished metal, steel and glass. Standard: If concrete is used, walls shall be enhanced by techniques such as texturing, reveals, and/or coloring with a concrete coating or admixture. Textured block is used-, painted to match canopy colors. Standard: if concrete block walls are used, they shall be enhanced with integral color, textured blocks and colored mortar, decorative bond pattern and/or shall incorporate other masonry materials. Compliant. Standard: All buildings shall use material variations such as colors, brick or metal handing, patterns, or textural changes. Compliant-, fuel canopy and kiosk both utilize horizontal color stripes with contrasting colors under the current plan. RRIO t R� ann _ - -MP — Guidelines: Front-lit, ground-mounted monumentsigns are the preferred type. of freestanding.sig.n.. Blade type signs, proportional to the building facade on which they are mounted, are encouraged on pedestrian-oriented streets.. Alteration of trademarks notwithstanding, corporate signage-should not be, garish in color nor overly,Iii,-although:creative-design, strong accent colors, and interesting surface - materials and lighting techniques are encouraged. - - Standard: Signage shall be an integral part of the design approach to the building. Signage is minimal on the fuel canopy and kiosk; limited to illuminated price signs, logos and channel-letter text identifying the facility as a Fred Meyer fuel facility on the canopy, and smaller, non-illuminated logos on the kiosk. Standard: Entry signs shall be limited to the name of the larger development. Not Applicable Standard: Corporate logos and signs shall be sized appropriately for their location. Compliant Standard: In mixed use and multi-use buildings, signage shall be coordinated with the overall building design. Standard: Freestanding ground -related monument signs, with the exception of primary entry signs, shall be limited to five feet (T) above finished grade, including support structure. All such signs shall include decorative landscaping (ground cover and/or shrubs) to provide seasonal interest in the area surrounding the sign. Alternately, signage may incorporate stone, brick, or outer decorative materials as approved by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee. Compliant; no new freestanding signage is being proposed. Standard: All of the following are prohibited: 1) Pole signs; 2) Roof signs; and 3) Back -fit signs with letters or graphics on a plastic sheet (can signs or illuminated cabinet signs). Exceptions: Back -lit logo signs less than ten (10) square feet are permitted, as are signs with only the individual letters back -lit. Compliant, logos are compliant in size and illuminated channel letters are used. Price signs are scrolling readerboards adjusted electronically - no advertising or text, only product identification is provided (unleaded, premium, etc.). Same as Benson Plaza. surra i rsur gLfin = eve Spin_ _ e -lar. ori � 3ieii es t = _ Guidelines: Lighting that_improves pedestrian -safety and,also that creates visual interest in the building and site during the evening -hours shall be..rovided. Standard: Pedestrian -scale lighting shall be provided at primary and secondary building entrances. Examples include sconces on building facades, awnings with down -lighting and decorative street lighting. Compliant. Standard: Accent lighting shall also be provided on building facades (such as sconces) and/or to illuminate other key elements of the site such as gateways, specimen trees, other significant landscaping, water features, and/or artwork. Not Applicable Standard: Downlighting shall be used in all cases to assure safe pedestrian and vehicular movement, unless alternative pedestrian scale lighting has been approved administratively or is specifically listed as exempt from provisions located in RMC 4-4-075. Lighting, Exterior On -Site (i.e-, signage, governmental flags, temporary holiday or decorative lighting, right -of -way -lighting, etc.). Compliant; all lighting fixtures used onsite are recessed or cut-off, with light focused down to ground. Fred Meyer Fuel - #459 - Renton Center City of Renton ti TREE RETENTION WORKSHEET N°V 1. Total number of trees over 6" in diameter' on project site-- 1. _18 trees 2. Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation: Trees that are dead, diseased or dangerous2 a trees Trees in proposed public streets 0 trees Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts 0 trees Trees in critical areas3 and buffers o trees Total number of excluded trees: 2. 0 trees 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1: 3. 18 trees 4. Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained4, multiply line 3 by: 0.3 in zones RG, R-1, R-4, or R-8 0.1 in all other residential zones 0.05 in all commercial and industrial zones 4. s trees 5. List the number of 6" or larger trees that you are proposing5 to retain: 5. 10 trees 6. Subtract line 5 from line 4 for trees to be replaced: 6. 1 trees (If line 6 is less than zero, stop here. No replacement trees are required). 7. Multiply line 6 by 12" for number of required replacement inches: 7. inches 8. Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement: (Minimum 2" caliper trees required) 8.Inches per tree 9. Divide line i by line 8 for number of replacement trees3: (if remainder is .5 or greater, round up to the next whale number) 9. trees Measured at chest height. 2. Dead, diseased or dangerous trees must be certified as such by a forester, registered landscape architect, or certified arborist, and approved by the City. a. Critical Areas, such as wetlands, streams, fieodplains and protected slopes, are defined in Section 4-3-650 of the Menton Municipal Code (RMC). " Count onfy those trees to be retained outside of critical areas and buffers. e' The City may require modification of the tree retention plan to ensure retention of the maximum number of trees per RMC 4-4-130H7a s. Inches of street trees, inches of trees added to critical areas/buffers, and inches of trees retained on site that are less than 6" but are greater than 2" can be used to meet the tree replacement requirement. H:ICED\Data\i-urnrs-Templatesl5clf-Help Handouts\Planning\TreeReterttionWorkslieet.doc 12108 Comprehensive Project Narrative Submitted in Conjunction with SEPA Environmental Review and Administrative Site Plan Review Conducted by the City of Renton, Department of Community and Economic Development Planning Division Under the Auspices of the State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) Proiect Name1017 :` Fred Meyer Fuel - #459 Renton Center Project Site NUV 1 Z81i 431 Rainier Avenue South, Renton WA 98057 Fred Meyer Store No. 459 BCE No. 13245.1 Parcel Number 000720-0209-08 6� 10) Project Location The proposed Fred Meyer Fuel Center would be built on a parcel located at 431 Rainier Avenue South, Renton WA 98457; immediately adjacent to the Fred Meyer retail complex. The project site's projected area of disturbance is approximately 49,223 square feet (1.13 acres) within the parcel (-4.2 acres) and is located approximately 500 feet to the E/NE, across the parking field, and adjacent to an established strip shopping center. Project Scope Fred Meyer's proposal calls for the construction a 43- by 160 -foot fuel canopy (6,884 square feet) and an 8- by 20 -foot (164 square feet) cashier's kiosk with ADA -accessible restroom. Under the 2009 International Building Code (IBC), the canopy and kiosk would be considered Type Il -B construction and categorized as a Class M Occupancy. The canopy will provide protective cover for nine (9) multi -product dispensers (MPDS), creating a fuel facility with eighteen (18) vehicle fueling positions (VFPs). The facility will also require the installation of two (2) underground storage tanks (USTs); one 20,000 - gallon UST for the storage of regular unleaded fuel, and one 18,000 -gallon split/dual UST (10,000/8,004 gallons each) divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. Other associated site improvements would include a backup generator, perimeter landscaping including various pedestrian and/or aesthetic amenities, minimal canopy signage, asphalt paving, lot lights, an air/water unit, and all required water quality/stormwater improvements and utility connections_ Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations The site is currently zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) and is designated as Commercial Corridor Land Use (CC) under the City of Renton's current Comprehensive Plan. Surrounding properties are also zoned CA and contain a variety of traditional retail and commercial office uses. No changes in zoning are being requested under this proposal. Existing Use 1 Improvements The project site is currently occupied with a single commercial structure serving as home to a video rental store and a restaurant. Existing site conditions include asphalt and/or concrete pavement, and a combination of perimeter and interior landscaping; consisting of assorted trees, miscellaneous shrubs and ground cover, located primarily along the E and NE perimeters; providing a degree of separation from City of Renton Fred yer Fuel - #459 Renton Center Comprehensive Project Narrative 2 431 Rainier Avenue South adjacent rights-of-way and various commercial uses. The site is directly accessible using a driveway from Rainier Avenue as primary access, along with secondary/internal access from other adjacent driveways and/or parking fields. Site Features The site is essentially flat with minimal gradients to promote drainage. In terms of impervious surface coverage, our preliminary plans incorporate the site's physical constraints into the overall project design and maintain the status quo, aside from a perimeter landscape buffer. Fuel Center Operations The Fred Meyer Fuel Center's hours of operation will mirror those of the Fred Meyer retail store. While the fuel center is designed to allow for unattended operation, an attendant will be stationed within the cashier's kiosk; executing cash payments and/or credit card transactions, monitoring payment -at -the - pump and fuel deliveries, and observing the fuel facility's operations. As is the case with all Fred Meyer Fuel Centers, the facility will be remotely supervised via security cameras and a 24/7!365 electronic alarm system, designed to become operational in the event of emergencies such as fire detection or breach of the inner/outer walls of the tanks or fuel distribution system. Refuse and recycling will be collected from the facility's containers and transferred to the store's facilities for refuse and/or recycling, as often as needed. A standby electrical generator designed to ensure fuel operations in the event of a power loss or natural disaster, is located the NW corner of the fuel facility. Parking stalls for employees will be shared with, and provided within the adjacent parking field. Queuing, Circulation and Access In an effort to provide improved queuing and onsite circulation, the fuel canopy features multiple stacking lanes; promoting direct access to the fuel dispensers, while allowing for adequate onsite circulation as customers leave the pump and exit onto adjacent rights-of-way. Direct access to adjacent public rights- of-way is proposed under the current plan; maintaining the previous access points. The city's installation of a median in Rainier Avenue has essentially transformed the existing driveway directly serving the fuel facility into a right -in / right -out driveway. Dedication of Public Rights -of -Way At this stage of the project, no right-of-way dedication is required. Perimeter landscaping and sidewalks will be provided along both frontages as part of the Renton Rainier Avenue Widening Project. Enhanced pedestrian amenities and/or landscape have been provided all frontages. Traffic and Trip Generation Using traditional trip generation methodology established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), the traffic impacts associated with a new Fred Meyer fuel facility are expected to be nominal. Based on ITE's methodology, the project is projected to generate 21 new or primary trips during the weekday PM peak hour (see table at right) — fewer than the trip generation of existing uses onsite (36 PM peak trips). TABLE 1 - FUELING FACILITY TRIP GENERATION Land Use (ITE Code) Weekday PM Peak Hour Enter I Exit Total Gasoline/Service Station 944 125 125 250 Intemal ca i,re 38% 47) 48 95) Total External Trips 78 TT 155 pass- Tris 52% 41 40 81 DWerted Tn s 3492 2S 27) 53 Primer Tris 11 10 21 City of Renton Frec yer Fuel - #459 Renton Center Comprehensive Project Narrative 3 431 Rainier Avenue South For a more complete discussion of trip generation and traffic impacts, please refer to the attached Preliminary Traffic Information and Scoping analysis, prepared by Group Mackenzie, revised May 24, 2012, after consultation with Renton staff. Required Permits With the installation of USTs, the project will require SEPA Environmental Review; and consequently, under Renton code, the Administrative Site Plan review process. The project site is also located within Urban Design District 'D'— thereby triggering a secondary design review process We anticipate the project will require the issuance of building permits (including electrical, mechanical and plumbing), construction permits, fire engineering permits (including UST installation and tank permits), grading permit, and sign permits (including related electrical permits) — all from the City of Renton. Peripheral permits be issued and/or licenses obtained from the Puget Sound Clean Air Authority (PSCAA), the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries (DL&I) and the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE). The City of Renton also reserves the right to inspect and approve all utility connections/plans undertaken in conjunction with this project. Proposed Improvements Landscaprn_g No off-site improvements are anticipated in conjunction with this proposal. Existing landscaping was significantly altered to accommodate the fuel facility design through the insertion of perimeter landscape. The project site is currently occupied with a single commercial structure serving as home to a video rental store and a restaurant. Existing site conditions include asphalt and/or concrete pavement, and a combination of perimeter and minimal interior parking lot landscaping; consisting of assorted trees, miscellaneous shrubs and ground cover, located primarily along the E and NE perimeters and within a parking planter/divider; providing a degree of separation from adjacent rights- of-way and various commercial uses_ The site is directly accessible using a driveway from Rainier Avenue as primary access, along with secondary/internal access from other adjacent driveways and/or parking fields. The proposed landscaping combines aesthetic elements and pedestrian amenities with a planting plan designed to fully complement and integrate with new frontage improvements built in conjunction with the widened right-of-way along Rainier Avenue, as well as with landscaping along private rights-of-way within the parking field. Green screens are provided at intervals along the Rainier Avenue frontage, and to a lesser extent, along the driveway leading into the complex. Plants and trees have been selected to mimic existing species, and physically placed to replicate spacing and planting patterns where possible. New and existing pedestrian sidewalks/pathways are accentuated with landscaping; separating the paths from the fuel center's maneuvering area. The creative placement of plantings along the SE perimeter also provides a degree of screening from the blank walls of the adjacent commercial structure. The pedestrian experience is further enhanced by the installation of two paved public areas; one at the NW corner of the site, the other at the SE corner, along the Rainier Avenue frontage. These paved public areas provide additional space for pedestrians to either cross the street or wait for the bus. Paving patterns have been selected which replicate the City's paving at similar paved areas along Rainier Avenue, under the right-of-way widening project. 3 City of Renton Frei yer Fuel - #459 Renton Center Comprehensive Project Narrative 4 431 Rainier Avenue South Public Safety All fire hydrants serving the site will be upgraded to current Renton standards for fittings, as needed. Fire lanes will be identified in accordance with City of Renton standards. Pedestrians are provided with two additional paved areas at locations where they may congregate while waiting to either cross the street or board a bus. Construction A job shack/office trailer will be located onsite during construction; an exact location will be determined in consultation with the general contractor after one is retained. The location selected will not obstruct lines of sight and will feature a clear view of the entire job site. Typically constructing this sizeltype of fuel facility requires the cut/fill of as much as 4,800 cubic yards of material, including asphalt and subsurface soils, during the installation of the underground storage tanks and the excavation necessary for the construction of footings and foundations. It the excavated material cannot be utilized onsite, it will be exported to an approved offsite location. Clean suitable structural fill will be imported from an approved source, if necessary. Modifications The street profile standards and resulting right-of-way dedications being enforced by the City of Renton in conjunction with redevelopment of the site, are dictating considerable deviation from the prototype design of a Fred Meyer Fuel Center. Combining these regulatory constraints with the physical constraints of a smaller site has produced a development scenario requiring modifications to current design standards in order for this project to be constructed_ setbacks The most pronounced observable modification comes in the area of setbacks. The project's operational requirements mandate a greater separation from the right-of-way/property line than specified by code. Physically placing the fuel canopy in a location which complied with the requirement would virtually eliminate the possibility of vehicle queuing/stacking and eliminate any operational functionality for the use. However, with the automotive nature of the use and the greater setback, Fred Meyer has modified the architectural design; enhancing the fuel canopy to make it more visually unique, while maintaining full operational capabilities — in an attempt to address the following criteria: a) Pedestrian Orientation ... lacking a pedestrian pathway from adjacent sidewalks to the fuel canopy/kiosk, Fred Meyer nevertheless meets the commitment to pedestrian orientation by maintaining pedestrian access around the perimeter frontage, while providing additional pedestrian enhancements within the landscape buffers. Due to the automotive nature of the use and the danger inherent to pedestrians traversing a high - traffic area full of visual obstructions (vehicles, pumps, columns, etc.) to their safety, pedestrian paths have not been provided directly linking the frontage improvements to the kiosk. Pedestrian striping has been provided on the site plan in those areas beneath the fuel canopy most likely to be traversed by pedestrian traffic attempting to access the kiosk from the dispensers. Crosswalks are provided to allow pedestrians a marked path across the facility's S/SW perimeter and access from Rainier Avenue is provided along both the NW and SE perimeters. b) Architectural Scale ... The fuel canopy is less than 20 -feet tall and encourages a smaller -scale street environment through minimal height and architectural modulation of the canopy, with a mansard roof featuring an simplified corporate color scheme, typical of Fred Meyer fuel branding. c) Visibility and Safety ... The project is designed to promote visibility beneath the fuel canopy and diminish less visible areas, primarily for operations, but also as a security factor. Beneath the 21 City of Renton Frei yer Fuel - #459 Renton Center Comprehensive Project Narrative 5 431 Rainier Avenue South canopy, the safety of pedestrians is assured as much as possible with customers channeled into clearly marked areas around the kiosk; minimizing potential conflict with the operations of the Fred Meyer Fuel Center. Queuing I Stacking Lanes Renton standards stipulate a minimum stacking capacity of five (5) vehicles within each stacking lane, serving a dispenser (MPD) and creating a vehicle fueling position (VFP), and that said stacking must not intrude into or block access drives or parking areas. A standard Fred Meyer fuel canopy design typically meets these standards; providing the customer with multiple choices for refueling. Fred Meyer staff considered various layouts, pump configurations, spacing/layout options and their impacts on queuing/stacking before deciding on the configuration submitted. This option is a standard, 9 -MPD configuration with ten (6) stacking lanes, serving five (5) MPDs and each of the ten (10) available VFPs, but also maintaining passing lanes beneath the canopy (green lines) and around the canopy's perimeter. t�_o C vtcp: " t Z53 7.0A This design provides drivers the ability to maneuver to take advantage of an unused VFP, and maintains the maximum number of VFPs available at any given time. The typical transaction takes between four and six minutes to be completed (a concept known as dwell time at the pump); thus the combination of more refueling options and easier accessibility leading to decreased dwell time, equates to less chance of a queuing/stacking problem developing. There is a minute chance that queued vehicles could extend into either the pedestrian crosswalks along the facility's S/SW perimeter or at the driveway from Rainier Avenue, and for this reason, the modification is noted. Our conclusions from a design perspective have been confirmed by traffic engineering professionals in the analysis prepared in conjunction with this application, by Group Mackenzie, dated May 24, 2012. Their analysis confirms adequate space for eighteen (18) vehicles at the MPDs/VFPs, and a stacking capacity of up to twenty (20) vehicles queued behind those refueling, and confirms the adequacy of the maneuvering area provided. In Group Mackenzie's professional opinion, and based on their experience with similar facilities, this queuing/stacking capacity is adequate and should allow for relatively unobstructed access to all driveways and parking areas during peak usage. Landscaping Renton code requires virtually all areas not subject to public improvements and/or site operations be fully landscaped; including a 10 -foot buffer along street frontages; calculated after right-of-way dedications are accommodated. Interior/ParkingLan_dscaping Although Renton's landscape code provides for a quantitative delineation between parking lot landscape and perimeter landscape, this project's lack of a significant area dedicated exclusively for parking, and the complete integration of the facility into the onsite parking City of Renton Fre yer Fuel - #459 Renton Center Comprehensive Project Narrative 6 431 Rainier Avenue South field serving the primary use, a separate calculation for dedicated parking lot interior landscaping is not realistically possible; thus the need for a modification in this area. Perimeter Landscaping The fuel center's site constraints and operational requirements have allowed for perimeter landscaping in excess of typical code requirements for commercial properties. Fred Meyer's plan essentially provides the full 10 -foot landscape buffer along the heavily traveled Rainier Avenue corridor, while providing a similar landscape buffer along the N/NW perimeter, adjacent to the shopping center's main driveway access, and a similar buffer with pedestrian path along the S/SE perimeter, buffering the commercial properties on an adjacent development. The nature of our modification request focuses on a small "niche" existing along the N/NW perimeter. To maximize maneuvering area while minimizing changes to the existing site, the landscape buffer along the N/NW perimeter decreases below the 10 -foot level where a "niche' abuts the existing sidewalk. Primarily to accommodate the placement of the required emergency generator, its concrete base and enclosure, Fred Meyer seeks to maintain this configuration. This location allows for easy access and keeps the generator away from basic fuel operations; minimizing the risk of damage. Refuse and Recycling Code requirements dictate a minimum area of one hundred (100) square feet shall be provided for refuse and recycling areas. With a combined area of 7,000 SF gross floor area, the project is required to provide 35 SF of recyclable storage area and 70 SF for refuse deposit areas, for a total requirement of 105 SF. On other sites where the fuel facility is adjacent to the Fred Meyer retail store, such as the relatively new Benson Plaza fuel facility in Renton, the fuel facility shares the larger refuse and recycling facilities serving the retail store; maximizing maneuvering area within the fuel facility and eliminating additional truck traffic. Refuse and recyclables are picked up daily, or based on the attendant's observations, more frequently, as needed. With this modification, Fred Meyer looks to replicate this shared facilities concept, as successfully applied at Benson Plaza, at the Renton Center facility as well. 6 City of Renton Fre eyer Fuel - #459 Renton Center Comprehensive Project Narrative 7 431 Rainier Avenue South Preliminary Project Cost Estimate The construction costs provided below are preliminary in nature and are subject to change; not included in these figures are sub -consultant costs (title, geotechnical, traffic, etc.). Clearance and Erosion Control $ 51,000 Yard Construction $ 7,846 Site Development $ 255,172 Paving & Landscaping $ 170,489 Sewer and Water 15,000 Total Estimated Construction Cost $ 499,507 Contingencies (10%) $ 49,951 Permit and Utility Fees - $ 141,357 Total $ 690,815 Estimated Market Value of Project Using Building Valuation Data and methodology established by the International Code Council (February 2012) for a structure of Type II -B and Class M Occupancy, the table below illustrates a general estimate; using the latest figure of $108.40 / SF: Fuel Canopy (6,880 SF) $ 745,792 Kiosk $ 23,414 Signage $ 25,000 Total $ 794,206 Modifications Narrative Submitted in Conjunction with SEPA Environmental Review and Administrative Site Plan Review Conducted by the City of Renton, Department of Community and Economic Development Planning Division Under the Auspices of the State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) 4•E . Pro'eet Name Fred Meyer Fuel - #459 Renton Center }`''`'' r ,;"r Project Site Nov 431 Rainier Avenue South, Renton WA 98057 . Q)1 r - Fred Meyer Store No. 459 BCE No. 13245.1 _1�;_.�li�r' Parcel Number 000720-0209-08 Project Location The proposed Fred Meyer Fuel Center would be built on a parcel located at 431 Rainier Avenue South, Renton WA 98057; immediately adjacent to the Fred Meyer retail complex. The project site's projected area of disturbance is approximately 49,223 square feet (1.13 acres) within the parcel (-4.2 acres) and is located approximately 500 feet to the ENE, across the parking field, and adjacent to an established strip shopping center. Project Scope Fred Meyer's proposal calls for the construction a 43- by 160 -foot fuel canopy (6,880 square feet) and an 8- by 20 -foot (160 square feet) cashier's kiosk with ADA -accessible restroom. Under the 2009 International Building Code (IBC), the canopy and kiosk would be considered Type II -B construction and categorized as a Class M Occupancy. The canopy will provide protective cover for nine (9) multi -product dispensers (MPDs), creating a fuel facility with eighteen (18) vehicle fueling positions (VFPs). The facility will also require the installation of two (2) underground storage tanks (USTs); one 20,000 - gallon UST for the storage of regular unleaded fuel, and one 18,000 -gallon split/dual UST (10,00018,000 gallons each) divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. Other associated site improvements would include a backup generator, perimeter landscaping including various pedestrian and/or aesthetic amenities, minimal canopy signage, asphalt paving, lot lights, an air/water unit, and all required water quality/stormwater improvements and utility connections. Modifications Combining regulatory constraints with the operational requirements of a prototype Fred Meyer fuel facility, and the physical constraints of this site has produced a development scenario requiring modifications to current design standards in order for this project to be constructed. In some cases, these modifications are offset by amenities provided elsewhere on the site or given credibility by professional studies; in others, they seek to replicate similar operational practices at Fred Meyer fueling operations in Renton. Setbacks The most pronounced observable modification comes in the area of setbacks. The project's operational requirements mandate a greater separation from the right-of-way/property line than specified by code. Physically placing the fuel canopy in a location which complied with the requirement would virtually eliminate the possibility of vehicle queuingistacking and eliminate any operational functionality for the use. City of Renton Fre_ .. eyer Fuel - #459 Renton Center Comprehensive Project Narrative 2 431 Rainier Avenue South However, with the automotive nature of the use and the greater setback, Fred Meyer has modified the architectural design; enhancing the fuel canopy to make it more visually unique, while maintaining full operational capabilities — in an attempt to address the following criteria: a) Pedestrian Orientation ... lacking a pedestrian pathway from adjacent sidewalks to the fuel canopy/kiosk, Fred Meyer nevertheless meets the commitment to pedestrian orientation by maintaining pedestrian access around the perimeter frontage, while providing additional pedestrian enhancements within the landscape buffers. Due to the automotive nature of the use and the danger inherent to pedestrians traversing a high - traffic area full of visual obstructions (vehicles, pumps, columns, etc.) to their safety, pedestrian paths have not been provided directly linking the frontage improvements to the kiosk. Pedestrian striping has been provided on the site plan in those areas beneath the fuel canopy most likely to be traversed by pedestrian traffic attempting to access the kiosk from the dispensers. Crosswalks are provided to allow pedestrians a marked path across the facility's SJSW perimeter and access from Rainier Avenue is provided along both the NW and SE perimeters. b) Architectural Scale ... The fuel canopy is less than 20 -feet tall and encourages a smaller -scale street environment through minimal height and architectural modulation of the canopy, with a mansard roof featuring an simplified corporate color scheme, typical of Fred Meyer fuel branding. c) Visibility and Safety ... The project is designed to promote visibility beneath the fuel canopy and diminish less visible areas, primarily for operations, but also as a security factor. Beneath the canopy, the safety of pedestrians is assured as much as possible with customers channeled into clearly marked areas around the kiosk; minimizing potential conflict with the operations of the Fred Meyer Fuel Center. Queuing 1 Stacking Lanes Renton standards stipulate a minimum stacking capacity of five (5) vehicles within each stacking lane, serving a dispenser (MPD) and creating a vehicle fueling position (VFP), and that said stacking must not intrude into or block access drives or parking areas. A standard Fred Meyer fuel canopy design typically meets these standards; providing the customer with multiple choices for refueling. Fred Meyer staff considered various layouts, pump configurations, spacing/layout options and their impacts on queuing/stacking before deciding on the configuration submitted. This option is a standard, 9 -MPD configuration with ten (6) stacking lanes, serving five (5) MPDS and each of the ten (10) available VFPs, but also maintaining passing lanes beneath the canopy (green lines) and around the canopy's perimeter. This design provides drivers the ability to maneuver to take advantage of an unused VFP, and maintains the maximum number of VFPs available at any given time. The typical transaction takes between four City of Renton Fre.. ,.,eyer Fuel - #459 Renton Center Comprehensive Project Narrative 3 431 Rainier Avenue South and six minutes to be completed (a concept known as dwell time at the pump); thus the combination of more refueling options and easier accessibility leading to decreased dwell time, equates to less chance of a queuing/stacking problem developing. There is a minute chance that queued vehicles could extend into either the pedestrian crosswalks along the facility's S/SW perimeter or at the driveway from Rainier Avenue, and for this reason, the modification is noted. Our conclusions from a design perspective have been confirmed by traffic engineering professionals in the analysis prepared in conjunction with this application, by Group Mackenzie, dated May 24, 2012. Their analysis confirms adequate space for eighteen (18) vehicles at the MPDsNFPs, and a stacking capacity of up to twenty (20) vehicles queued behind those refueling, and confirms the adequacy of the maneuvering area provided. In Group Mackenzie's professional opinion, and based on their experience with similar facilities, this queuing/stacking capacity is adequate and should allow for relatively unobstructed access to all driveways and parking areas during peak usage. Landscaping Renton code requires virtually all areas not subject to public improvements and/or site operations be fully landscaped; including a 10 -foot buffer along street frontages; calculated after right-of-way dedications are accommodated. interior/Parking Landscaping Although Renton's landscape code provides for a quantitative delineation between parking lot landscape and perimeter landscape, this project's lack of a significant area dedicated exclusively for parking, and the complete integration of the facility into the onsite parking field serving the primary use, a separate calculation for dedicated parking lot interior landscaping is not realistically possible; thus the need for a modification in this area. Perimeter Landscaping The fuel center's site constraints and operational requirements have allowed for perimeter landscaping in excess of typical code requirements for commercial properties. Fred Meyer's plan essentially provides the full 10 -foot landscape buffer along the heavily traveled Rainier Avenue corridor, while providing a similar landscape buffer along the N/NW perimeter, adjacent to the shopping center's main driveway access, and a similar buffer with pedestrian path along the S/SF perimeter, buffering the commercial properties on an adjacent development. The nature of our modification request focuses on a small "niche" existing along the N/NW perimeter. To maximize maneuvering area while minimizing changes to the existing site, the landscape buffer along the N/NW perimeter decreases below the 10 -foot level where a "niche' abuts the existing sidewalk. Primarily to accommodate the placement of the required emergency generator, its concrete base and enclosure, Fred Meyer seeks to maintain this configuration. This location allows for easy access and keeps the generator away from basic fuel operations; minimizing the risk of damage. Refuse and Recycling Code requirements dictate a minimum area of one hundred (100) square feet shall be provided for refuse and recycling areas. With a combined area of 7,000 SF gross floor area, the project is required to provide 35 SF of recyclable storage area and 70 SF for refuse deposit areas, for a total requirement of 105 SF. On other sites where the fuel facility is adjacent to the Fred Meyer retail store, such as the relatively new Benson Plaza fuel facility in Renton, the fuel facility shares the larger refuse and recycling facilities serving the retail store; maximizing maneuvering area within the fuel facility and eliminating additional truck traffic. Refuse and recyclables are picked up daily, or based on the attendant's observations, more frequently, as needed. With this modification, Fred Meyer looks to replicate this shared facilities concept, as successfully applied at Benson Plaza, at the Renton Center facility as well. 3 Landscaping, Lot Coverage & Parking Analysis Narrative Submitted |nConjunction with SEPA Environmental Review and Administrative Site Plan R�^m''ew Conducted bythe City ofRenton, Department ofCommunity and Economic Development Planning Division Under the Auspices of the State Environmental Protection Act (QEPA) ProFect Name Fred Meyer Fuel ~ #459 Renton enter Pro'ect Site 431 Rainier Avenue South, Renton WA 98057 Nov _ Fred Meyer Store No. 459 BCE No. 13245.1 y ' Parcel Number 000720-0209-08 , Project Location .. The proposed Fred Meyer Fuel Center would be built on a parcel located at 431 Rainier Avenue South, Renton VVAQ8O57; immediately adjacent k) the Fred Meyer retail complex. The project site's projected area o[disturbance is approximately 49.223square feet (1 13 acres) within the parcel (-4.2 acres) and is located approximately 50Ofeet tothe E/NE, across the parking fie|d, and adjacent to an established strip shopping center. Project Scope Fred Meyer's proposal calls for the construction e43' by 160 -foot fuel canopy (6,880 square feet) and on 8' by 20 -foot (160 square feet) cashier's kiosk with ADA -accessible restroom. Under the 2880 International Building Code (113C), the canopy and kiosk would be considered Type 11-B construction and categorized as u Class M Occupancy. The canopy will provide protective cover for nine (9) multi -product dispensers (MPOa), creating afuel facility with eighteen (18)vehicle fueling positions (VF Ps). The facility will also require the installation of two (2) underground storage tanks (USTo); one 20,000 - gallon UST for the storage of regular unleaded fue|, and one 18'000'goUnn split/dual UST (10.080/8.000 gallons each) divided between diesel and supreme unleaded fuel. Other associated site improvements would include a backup generator. perimeter landscaping including various pedestrian and/or aesthetic amonidoa, minimal canopy signage, asphalt paving. lot lights, an air/water unit, and all required water qua|ity/atormwmterimprovements and utility connections. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations The site is currently zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) and is designated as Commercial Corridor Land Use (CC) under the City of Renton'o current Comprehensive Plan. Surrounding properties aro also zoned CA and contain a variety of traditional retail and commercial office uses. No changes in zoning are being requested under this proposal. City of Renton Topical Project Narrative Landscape Analysis Frei yer Fuel - #459 Renton Center 2 431 Rainier Avenue South The project site is currently occupied with a single commercial structure serving as home to a video rental store and a restaurant. Existing site conditions include asphalt and/or concrete pavement, and a combination of perimeter and minimal interior parking lot landscaping; consisting of assorted trees, miscellaneous shrubs and ground cover, located primarily along the E and NE perimeters and within a parking planter/divider; providing a degree of separation from adjacent rights-of-way and various commercial uses. The site is directly accessible using a driveway from Rainier Avenue as primary access, along with secondary/internal access from other adjacent driveways and/or parking fields. The proposed landscaping combines aesthetic elements and pedestrian amenities with a planting plan designed to fully complement and integrate with new frontage improvements built in conjunction with the widened right-of-way along Rainier Avenue, as well as with landscaping along private rights-of-way within the parking field. Green screens are provided at intervals along the Rainier Avenue frontage, and to a lesser extent, along the driveway leading into the complex. Plants and trees have been selected to mimic existing species, and physically placed to replicate spacing and planting patterns where possible. New and existing pedestrian sidewalks/pathways are accentuated with landscaping; separating the paths from the fuel center's maneuvering area. The creative placement of plantings along the SE perimeter also provides a degree of screening from the blank walls of the adjacent commercial structure. The pedestrian experience is further enhanced by the installation of two paved public areas; one at the NW corner of the site, the other at the SE corner, along the Rainier Avenue frontage. These paved public areas provide additional space for pedestrians to either cross the street or wait for the bus. Paving patterns have been selected which replicate the City's paving at similar paved areas along Rainier Avenue, under the right-of-way widening project. The site is essentially flat with minimal gradients to promote drainage. In terms of impervious surface coverage, our preliminary plans incorporate the site's physical constraints into the overall project design and with the addition of a perimeter landscape buffer realizes a minimal decrease in impervious surface and a substantive increase in landscaping. Lot Coverage Lot Coverage Pre -Development Post -Development Change Fred Meyer Fuel Center Site Site Disturbance--- 49,223 49,223Total Building/Structure Footprints ... includes canopy and kiosk 12,000 7,000 -42.7% Paved Drives, Sidewalks & Parking ... includes generator pad 31,573 35,459 12.3% Total Impervious Surface 43,573 42,459 -.3% Landscaping / Perimeter includes 761 SF of paved public space 3,400 3,377 99.3% Landscaping / Interior 1,250 3,397 +271.7% Total Landscaped Surface 5,650 6,774 +19.9% Parking Analysis The adjacent Fred Meyer parking field will provide 1,314 parking stalls — including 23 ADA -accessible stalls — for use by the various retail uses contained within the shopping center. Our proposal calls for the removal of 76 stalls; primarily serving the video rental store and restaurant. City of Renton Topical Project Narrative Fres yer Fuel - #459 Renton Center 3 431 Rainier Avenue South The Fred Meyer proposal calls for a 6,880 SF fuel canopy and a 120 SF cashier's kiosk. With 18 vehicles at the MPDs/VFPs and with stacking space for up to 20 vehicles within the canopy's maneuvering area, this project meets or exceeds code requirements_ Renton standards stipulate a minimum stacking capacity of five (5) vehicles within each stacking lane, serving a dispenser (MPD) and creating a vehicle fueling position (VFP), and that said stacking must not intrude into or block access drives or parking areas. A standard Fred Meyer fuel canopy design typically meets these standards; providing the customer with multiple choices for refueling. Our conclusions from a design perspective have been confirmed by traffic engineering professionals in the analysis prepared in conjunction with this application, by Group Mackenzie, dated May 24, 2012. Their analysis confirms adequate space for eighteen (18) vehicles at the MPDs/VFPs, and a stacking capacity of up to twenty (20) vehicles queued behind those refueling, and confirms the adequacy of the maneuvering area provided. In Group Mackenzie's professional opinion, and based on their experience with similar facilities, this queuing/stacking capacity is adequate and should allow for relatively unobstructed access to all driveways and parking areas during peak usage. Construction Mitigation Narrative Submitted in Conjunction with SEPA Environmental Review and Administrative Site Plan Review Conducted by the City of Renton, Department of Community and Economic Development Planning Division Under the Auspices of the State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) Project Name Fred Meyer Fuel - #459 Renton Center Icy c ;3", nyk�, �S7r1t71riC: (Jr�l.Si�� Proiect Site 431 Rainier Avenue South, Renton WA 98057 Boil Fred Meyer Store No. 459 BCE No. 13245.1 Parcel Number 000720-0209-08� rr- Construction Schedule Assuming the plan review process proceeds normally, construction of the fueling facility is anticipated to begin on or about March 1, 2013. Construction of similar Fred Meyer fuel facilities has historically required between ten (10) to twelve (12) weeks. Allowing for contingencies, Fred Meyer anticipates construction will conclude on or about June 1, 2013. Hours of Operation Following a traditional workday schedule, construction is expected to commence no earlier than 7:00 AM and conclude no later than 5:00 PM. No construction activity will be required on Saturdays, Sundays or holidays. Adequate parking is available onsite for construction workers and if necessary, in the adjacent Fred Meyer parking lot. Hauling/Transportation Routes Vehicles and equipment involved in the demolition and construction phases of the project will be required to utilize adjacent public rights-of-way, specifically Rainier Avenue, when en route to or from the construction site. Traffic Control Plan Despite the site's location within a commercial corridor, with work relegated exclusively to private property, we do not anticipate significant traffic impacts to be generated by the construction of the fueling facility. As part of the construction permit process, should unanticipated circumstances arise, Fred Meyer will coordinate the preparation of a traffic control plan, based on Renton staff input. Following best management practices associated with construction sites, the site will be fenced as a security and safety measure during site clearing/preparation and construction of the facility_ City of Renton Construction Narrative Onsite Mitigation Measures Fr leyer Fuel #459 Renton Center 2 431 Rainier Avenue South Specific mitigation measures are discussed detailed in the SEPA Environmental Checklist, but a general summary of possible impacts and proposed mitigation is presented in the table below: Impact Mitigation c A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan (TESC) will be implemented to manage ca 0Z stormwater runoff; beginning with site preparation and land clearing and concluding upon the o E completion of the project, or when the potential for erosion has passed. U a a r m No light or glare is expected to occur as a result of construction activity. rn� J Existing driveways will be utilized and improved to provide adequate access to the site. Construction equipment and vehicles will be restricted to the use of adjacent principal arterials a to access the site. The impacts of emissions upon air quality are expected to be minimal; emanating from construction equipment initially, and later, on a more permanent basis, from future vehicle traffic. These impacts are mitigated through efficient design of the facility, the number of fueling y positions, adequate vehicle queuing and overall site circulation. State-of-the-art vapor recovery equipment will work to recapture/contain escaping vapors throughout the fuel delivery system. 'a Minimal levels of airborne dust particles may be realized during the excavation/filling processes accompanying construction. These impacts will be fully addressed by the measures outlined in the TESC. Erosion controls will be maintained throughout construction in accordance with the provisions of L the TESC plan. stormwater runoff will be collected and discharged to the existing stormwater system, at the existing point of discharge. 3 Once the facility becomes operational, onsite stormwater management proposes to separate 0 m under -canopy runoff, pre -treat with an oil/water separator and then be discharged into the sanitary sewer. Short-term sources of noise pollution will originate from the use of construction equipment and will vary in their frequency and intensity. Maximum noise levels can typically be expected to range between 72- to 90 -decibels, as measured from a distance of 50 -feet away from the .73 source. These impacts will be of limited duration and mitigated, to the extent possible, through Z the use and maintenance of efficient mufflers and noise abatement devices on construction vehicles and equipment. PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST-... pe n City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 3 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: I . r U lc The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROIECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, pians and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. - 1 - 06109 PA13000s1132451pfurninglSubmitluIs102 - SEPA & SPH - 2012-00-00,Assernblff NAL --- 13245-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST -Renton Cenler-2012-10-20.doc A. 7 3 21 5 Con 7 A BACKGROUND Name of proposed project, if applicable: Fred Meyer Fuel - #459 Renton Center Name of applicant: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Date checklist prepared: October 12, 2012 Agency requesting checklist: Agent 1 Contact Person Robert McNeill Senior Planner Barghausen Consulting Engineers 18215 72nd Avenue South Kent WA 98032 425-656-1061 bmcneill@barghausen.com City of Renton / Department of Community and Economic Development I Planning Division Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Assuming standard Renton entitlement and permitting processes, with minimal delays, the construction process is expected to begin on / about March 1, 2013; anticipating a 10-12 week construction period, the project should be completed on 1 about June 1, 2013. The process will be continuous with no phasing anticipated. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. There are no plans for future expansion at this time, and none are likely, given the site's physical constraints. Historically Fred Meyer fuel stations are upgraded with new imaging and signage (branding) about every 8-10 years, as a matter of corporate policy. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Several reports have been prepared in support of this proposal and are detailed and/or described below; if not provided in conjunction with this application, they shall be made available for review, as necessary: Title Report .,. providing an record reflecting title and ownership of the property, while identifying recorded easements, covenants, restrictions and/or conditions associated with previous development approvals -2- 06149 P:1130L 1k%1324.51plinn'nq',Suhmittals',02 - SFPA & SPR - 2012-60-001Assemh10FINAL --- 13245-F-PFRK1-APPL-SFPA-FNVR CHLCKLIST-Renton C este r -2012-10-20.d oc Owner / Applicant Name 4James Coombes Title 3Sr Entitlements Manager Company 4Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. Address 43800 SE 22nd Avenue City/State/Zip 4Portland OR 97202 Phone: 4503-797-5617 E -Mail: ->james,coombes@fredmeyer,com Date checklist prepared: October 12, 2012 Agency requesting checklist: Agent 1 Contact Person Robert McNeill Senior Planner Barghausen Consulting Engineers 18215 72nd Avenue South Kent WA 98032 425-656-1061 bmcneill@barghausen.com City of Renton / Department of Community and Economic Development I Planning Division Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Assuming standard Renton entitlement and permitting processes, with minimal delays, the construction process is expected to begin on / about March 1, 2013; anticipating a 10-12 week construction period, the project should be completed on 1 about June 1, 2013. The process will be continuous with no phasing anticipated. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. There are no plans for future expansion at this time, and none are likely, given the site's physical constraints. Historically Fred Meyer fuel stations are upgraded with new imaging and signage (branding) about every 8-10 years, as a matter of corporate policy. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Several reports have been prepared in support of this proposal and are detailed and/or described below; if not provided in conjunction with this application, they shall be made available for review, as necessary: Title Report .,. providing an record reflecting title and ownership of the property, while identifying recorded easements, covenants, restrictions and/or conditions associated with previous development approvals -2- 06149 P:1130L 1k%1324.51plinn'nq',Suhmittals',02 - SFPA & SPR - 2012-60-001Assemh10FINAL --- 13245-F-PFRK1-APPL-SFPA-FNVR CHLCKLIST-Renton C este r -2012-10-20.d oc Survey. Boundary & Topographical ... providing a geophysical, cartographic representation of the development parameters associated with this site; combining field observations with documentation memorialized in the title report Preliminary Traffic Information and Scoping Analysis ... authored after consultation and scoping with staff, an analysis of trip generation and transportation impacts; comparing existing use(s) with the projected impacts and/or trip generation derived from the proposed fuel center ... dated May 24, 2012, prepared by Group Mackenzie, Portland WA Geotechnical Engineering Report ... an analysis of the suitability of soils found onsite, relative to projected design constraints; including, but not limited to, recommendations for footings, foundations and subgrade preparation, as well as excavation protocols used for the tank pit (USTs) ... dated June 5, 2012, prepared by The Riley Group, Bothell WA 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. To the best of our knowledge, there are no pending applications or approvals for this site. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. The following permits / approvals will be required to construct the proposed fuel center: • SEPA Environmental Checklist • Administrative Site Plan Review • Urban Design District Review • Building Permit (Canopy & Kiosk) • MEP Permits (Mechanical / Electrical / Plumbing) • Fire Engineering (USTs and Monitoring Systems) • NPDES ... area of disturbance exceeds one acre • Construction Permit/ Grading • Right -of -Way Use Permit • Sign Permits • Utility Connection Permits • Business License • Notice of Construction (PSCAA) • UST Installation (WSDOE) • UST Licensing (WSDOL) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. Fred Meyer's proposal calls for the construction a 43- by 160 -foot fuel canopy (6,880 square feet) and an 8- by 20 -foot (160 square feet) cashier's kiosk with ADA -accessible restroom. Using the 2009 International Building Code (IBC), the canopy and kiosk would be built using Type II -B construction and categorized as a Class M Occupancy. The canopy will provide protective cover for nine (9) multi -product dispensers (MPDs), creating a fuel facility with eighteen (18) vehicle fueling positions (VFPs). The facility will also require the installation of two (2) underground storage tanks (USTs); one 20,000 -gallon UST for the storage of regular unleaded fuel, and one 18,000 -gallon split/dual UST (10,00018,000 gallons each) divided between diesel and supreme unleaded -3- 06!09 P:'113000s+.13245%planriiny',SLibrnittulsl02 - SEPA & SPR- 2012-00-00',AssemblyTINAL --- 13245+-PERM-ADPL-$EPA-ENVR CHECKLIST -Renton Center-2012-10-20.doc fuel. Other associated site improvements would include a backup generator, perimeter landscaping, limited canopy signage, asphalt paving, lot lights, an air/water unit and required water qualitylstormwater improvements and utility connections. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposed Fred Meyer Fuel Center would be built within the parking field of an existing shopping center, Parcel # 00072-002-09, with the fuel facility sited at 431 Rainier Avenue South, Renton WA 98057. The projected area of disturbance is estimated at 49,200 SF. The project site is currently occupied by a commercial structure (approximately 12,000 square feet, plus parking); two separate commercial uses share the existing structure, a video rental store and a full-service restaurant. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL F, CITY OF RENTON BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LUA 99-017, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9904069001, BEING A PORTION OF HENRY H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37; GOVERNMENT LOTS 11, 13 AND 16 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AND TRACTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 OF SUPPLEMENTAL MAP OF RENTON SHORELANDS; EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 20110811001002. APN: 000720-0209-08 4- 06109 PA130006113245:%planHingSubmiltals.02 - SEPA & SPR - 2012-00-00tA; .sembly%FINAI -- 1W45-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST -Renton C e rite r-2012-10-20. doc B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS EARTH General description of the site (circle oneflat, Iling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The site is essentially flat with minimal slopes utilized for drainage purposes. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Slopes in the driveway areas are projected to be in the neighborhood of five percent (5%); actual slope will be adjusted through the civil design process. C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soil is projected to be glacial till; a light to dark gray, non -sorted, non -stratified mixture of clay, silt, sand, with variable sizing. A detailed description of soil type and strata can be found in the attached Geotechnical Engineering Report. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. To the best of our knowledge, there is no history of soil instability associated with the site and there are no visible signs of instability. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately 4,800 cubic yards of material, consisting primarily of asphalt and subsurface soil, is likely to be affected onsite during cuttfill activity directed at clearing and tank excavation. Materials deemed unsuitable for reuse as structural fill will be removed from the site to an approved location; likewise, any fill materials imported will be sourced only from approved sources. Should any contaminated soils be identified during the construction process, they shall be removed and disposed of in accordance with applicable regulations. - 5 - 06109 P:1130U0si132451planninUlSubmittals102 - SEPA & SPR - 2012-00-00'%Asscmbly%FINAL --- 13245-F-PERM-ADPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST-Rcnlon Ce nter-2012-10-20. doc Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion is always possible during the rainy season, but not considered likely during our construction phase, which is tentatively scheduled to avoid our wettest weather. However any erosion occurring would not be significant, primarily due to the site's physical constraints and would be handled by the mitigations proposed in our TESCP. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? While a final site plan design awaits approval, and subject to final calculation, we estimate lot coverage by impervious surface will be approximately ninety percent (90%). Our site plan currently provides perimeter and interior landscaping, but at a reduced level, due to the loss of property to meet required street improvements and right-of-way dedications. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Any measures to reduce and/or control erosion and sedimentation will be specified in a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP); designed to be fully compliant with the standards and specifications of the most recently applicable Washington State Department of Ecology (WSDOE) Stormwater Design Manual. In addition, the project will be implemented using best management practices (BMPs) recommended by WSDOE, as well as specific comments and requirements mandated by Renton staff during the plan review process. Typically, erosion and sedimentation control begins with the excavation of the tank pit for UST installation, and continues throughout the construction process; concluding only upon the project's completion or when the potential for erosion has passed. Due to the high level of impervious surface and a minimal area of disturbance, specifically for excavation purposes, erosion controls are likely to be limited to the use of sandbags to divert stormwater to catch basins, which will in turn, be provided with inlet protection. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. As proposed, the project will not significantly impact air quality; any impacts would be derived from the construction of the fuel center, future operations and customer traffic. During construction, heavy equipment will emit exhaust fumes originating from their use of gasoline and/or diesel fuels. These emissions would be temporary in nature and not produce any short-term or long-term harmful effects on the project, customers, adjacent properties and/or nearby Renton residents. Airborne particulates may be generated during the land clearing, excavation and grading phases of construction, but we anticipate only minimal impacts as the provisions of the TESCP are implemented. After construction is completed and the fuel center is in operation, emissions will originate from customer vehicles and fuel delivery trucks. These emissions will likely include some suspended particles, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOXs), sulfur oxides (SOXs), - 6 - 06/09 P:113000si132451planriiny'�SubrriittaIs',02 -SEPA & SPR -2012-00-00',AssembIy,F INAL --- 13245-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST -Renton Center -2012-10-20.d oc volatile organic compounds (VOCs), hydrocarbons and related airborne pollutants typically associated with the use of fossil fuels. L Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. The only identifiable source of offsite emissions lies in the vehicular traffic found on the adjoining public and/or private rights-of-way. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: As further detailed in the TESCP, the number of airborne particulates and/or dust particles will be minimized through the controlled watering of the grounds, as needed, before and during land, clearing, excavation and grading activity. Construction vehicle emissions will be controlled primarily through the use of factory - installed mufflers and spark arresters; minimizing the amount of noxious emissions and noise, as well as helping to control airborne dispersal. To minimize impacts during fuel center operations, vapor recovery systems and equipment, fully certified by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) will be utilized in all stages of the fuel distribution process. CARB-certified Stage I dual -point systems will be utilized at the USTs to reduce vapor rel easelemiss ions during deliveries. At the dispensers, typical refueling operations will utilize CARB-certified Stage Il systems to reduce/recover vapors. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No surface water body is located in the immediate vicinity of the project site; no water courses, wetlands, ponds or streams located onsite. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Not Applicable 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not Applicable -7- 06/09 Pai3000 '13245Vplanning%SubmittalsT2 - SEPA & SPR - 2012-00-04'%Assemhly\FINAL --- 13245-F-PERM-ADPL-SEPA-ENVR GHLGKLIST-Renton Center 2012-10-20-dnc 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. As proposed/designed, the project will not require either the diversion or withdrawal of surface water. Surface runoff will be controlled onsite, and after treatment, be released to the designated point of discharge. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. According to FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Community Panel 53033C0977F, Panel 977 of 1725, dated May 16, 1995, the project site is located in Zone X, and does not lie within a 500 -year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. This project does not involve the discharge of waste materials to surface waters. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. As proposed, this project does not involve the withdrawal of groundwater and no new water sources will be discharged to groundwater. Test borings have indicated the presence of groundwater at certain levels/strata, but these are being considered perched sources, which may require minimal dewatering during peak rainy periods. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. The only potential source for waste materials entering the ground associated with this project, lies in unspent hydrocarbons and/or heavy metals collected in surface runoff from the maneuvering area or parking stalls, as conveyed through the onsite stormwater collection system, C. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Stormwater runoff from paved surfaces in the maneuvering and parking areas will be collected and conveyed to a stormwater collection system; incorporating BMPs and in full compliance with all stormwater regulations mandated by the City of Renton. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Surface water could be contaminated by runoff containing oil, unspent hydrocarbons and other contaminants from the paved maneuvering and parking areas. -8- 06M R: 13004st13245�plannirg''Submittals102 - SEPA & SPR - 2012-00-Q01ASSemb1ff 1NAL --- 13245-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST -Renton C ernie r-2012-10-20. doc d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Stormwater runoff from the concrete drive slab/pad located beneath the fuel canopy will be collected and subsequently, conveyed through an oil/water separator, and the discharged into the sanitary sewer system. a. PLANTS Check or n found on the site: eciduous tree: alder, m;app other e, other shrubs g pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The existing landscaping onsite is mixture of trees, bushes, shrubs and/or miscellaneous ground cover, in variable condition. Existing vegetation will be incorporated into the new landscape plan for the fuel center whenever possible. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. To the best of our knowledge, there are no threatened or endangered species known to be located on or in the immediate vicinity of the site. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: A new landscape plan is proposed, utilizing vegetation and plantings which are native to the Pacific Northwest and which are proven to survive within a high traffic area typically associated with a commercial fuel station environment. Plans will include the provision of any necessary irrigation systems; assuring proper maintenance of the planned landscape. 5. ANIMALS Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagl songbirds, her Mammals: deer, bear, elk, er Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other -9- 061,09 P.11340ps1132451planningiSu6mittals'�02 - SEPA & SPR - 2012-00-401AssemblyVFtlNAL -- 13245-F-PLRM-ADPL-SLPA-ENVR CHFCKUST-Renton Center -2012-10-21d oc b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. To the best of our knowledge, there are no threatened or endangered species known to be located on or in the immediate vicinity of the site. C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain The project site is located within the Pacific Flyway; a well-known migratory route for many species, including waterfowl. No impacts associated with the project are likely to affect migratory species or any temporary habitats associated with their migration patterns d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: With no negative impacts to wildlife or their habitats having been identified, specific mitigation measures are not necessary, and consequently, none have been proposed in conjunction with this project. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical energy will be used to provide power to the fuel facility. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Due to the relatively flat nature of the site and its corner location, combined with the placement/orientation of the fuel canopy itself, the project will not adversely affect the potential use of solar energy by any of the adjacent uses. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The proposed fuel facility is being designed to be fully compliant with the current standards imposed by the Washington State Energy Code. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No extraordinary health risks are foreseen. Potential environmental health hazards could originate with incidental exposure to gasoline; an inherent risk associated with the refueling process of any vehicle. Other similar hazards include the risk of fire and/or potential soil contamination in the unlikely event of a spill and/or release of petroleum products from the USTs, the fuel distribution system or piping and/or the dispensers. _10- 06109 P:113000s'13245',plenrning'�Suhmittalsl02 - SLPA & SPR - 2012-40-ODAssemhlVFINAL --- 13245-F-PERM-APDL-SEFA-ENVR CHECKLIST -Renton Center-2012-10-20.doc 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Special emergency services would not be required under typical operating conditions; any demand place upon existing emergency services would be consistent in nature and frequency of use with comparable projects. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Kroger, Fred Meyer and QFC Fuel Centers typically utilize advanced protocols and state-of- the-art technology and systems to reduce and/or control the potential for environmental hazards. These features include, but are not limited to, the following; • Emergency shutoff switches located in accordance with Uniform Fire Code standards and compliant with all local code requirements; typically, two shutoff switches are located at the kiosk. • In accordance with the International Fire Code (IFC) and situated per local code requirements, fire extinguishers are also provided onsite. • The USTs installed onsite, as well as all product piping, feature double-wall fiberglass construction; providing primary and secondary levels of protection. This type of construction helps to protect against rupture or leakage, as well as corrosive deterioration of the tank walls and subsequent soil contamination. • Additional primary and secondary containment features include overfill prevention (OPW automatic shutoff drop tubes risers), gravity return of any undispensed product, the use of flex -joints at the USTs and popetted breakaway/impact valves at the dispensers. • The potential release of fuel vapors into the air is controlled by the use of CARB- certified Stage I and Stage II vapor recovery systems onsite. Working together, these systems greatly reduce the amount of vapor released during fuel deliveries to the USTs (Stage 1) and at the dispensers during the refueling process (Stage 11). • The fuel distribution system components are constantly monitored to detect leakage or system failure via a 24/7/365 computerized system. This system provides interstitial monitoring of the space between component wallsllayers; detecting leaks and immediately notifying the attendant onsite (visual and audible alarms) and the offsite Kroger Fuel Monitoring Center (Denver CO), while simultaneously shutting down the affected portions of the system. Protocols are in place to identify the proper response and responders for any type of emergency situation; while visual and computerized monitoring is conducted both onsite and offsite, responders are local and on-call, 2417/365. • Components are installed by certified installers and pressure -tested during the installation process in accordance with manufacturers' specifications; detecting pressure loss and identifyinglisolating problem areas, allowing for corrections, repair or replacement before the site is completely paved and distribution system components are covered. • Enhanced employee training and strictly enforced operational protocols provide the last safeguard against potential environmental hazards. Professional drivers are experienced and highly skilled, not only in the safe transport and delivery of fuel, but also in safety and containment procedures should a spill occur. Fuel center employees are similarly trained in proper response techniques and emergency procedures; detailed in a hazardous material spill and prevention plan, kept onsite at all times. Clean-up kits and materials are readily accessible onsite at all times. - 19 - 06109 P:',130CCjs'�13245iplanning',SubmittalsM - SEPA & SPR - 2012-DO-DMAssemblyTINAL -- 13245-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST-Ronlon Center -2012-16 20.doc b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Any noise impact the project site will likely originate from the adjacent public or private rights-of-way - primarily Rainier Avenue. However noise levels are not projected to reach a point where any adverse impacts will be realized. Z) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The amount of noise generated by the construction process will vary according to the type and size of equipment used throughout the various stages of construction. At maximum, the decibel output associated with this type/nature of activity is projected to range between 57 and 89 DBA. After construction is completed and the project is fully operational, noise impacts will be limited to the levels generated by vehicular traffic onsite and are not expected to exceed current levels associated with other commercial uses in the adjacent properties. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction noise will be mitigated through the use of noise attenuation devices on equipment and will be further limited in duration due to construction restrictions imposed by the local jurisdictions. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The project site is occupied by a commercial structure housing a video rental store and a restaurant, along with related parking and landscaping. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. To the best of our knowledge, the site has not been used for agricultural purposes. C. Describe any structures on the site. Commercial structures - approximately 12,000 SF - constructed of masonry, framing and glass, in reasonably good condition. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Demolition of the existing structure and parking improvements will be required. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The site is currently zoned CA 1 Commercial Arterial, as are all adjacent properties; no rezoning is anticipated. The site also falls within the Urban Design District `D' and is subject to additional design review guidelines. - 12 - 06/09 P:113DOOs',132451planning Supmdlalsi02 SEPA & SPR - 2012-00-00''AssernbIYFINAL --- 13245-F-PERM-APPL-SFPA-ENVR CHECKLIST -Renton Gen ter-2012-10-21doc f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? CC / Commercial Corridor; the site is also covered by the NE 4th Street Corridor Plan g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not Applicable h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. To the best of our knowledge, there are no environmentally sensitive areas and the project is not located within an aquifer protection zone. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Typical fuel facility staffing dictates a single attendant would be stationed onsite, within the kiosk; monitoring transactions and deliveries, as well as handling customer inquiries. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? No displacement of either residential or commercial uses is associated with this project. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: With no displacement projected, specific mitigation measures - such as possible relocation assistance - are neither required nor proposed. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Project and use compatibility is assured through substantial compliance with existing land use plans, zoning controls and other regulatory codes imposed by local, state and/or Federal authorities with jurisdiction. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. This project does not have a residential component. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not Applicable -13- 06109 P:',13000s'13245%planniny�,Subrnittals102 - SEPA & SPR - 2012-00-001AssembIff INAL 13245-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST-Rerton Center -2012-10-20 doc c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: With no displacement projected and no residential component associated with the project, specific mitigation measures — such as possible relocation assistance - are neither required nor proposed. 10. AESTHETICS What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The proposed fuel canopy will extend approximately 19 -feet above grade. The fuel canopy will be constructed of steel and supported by steel columns; fuel canopies are typically categorized under Type 11-B Construction and Group M Occupancy (Mercantile). The canopy will be painted in corporate colors and feature minimal signage on each fascia, used for corporate identification and to provide product/price information. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No views will be altered or obstructed by the project. Typical setback requirements and other zoning regulations govern the placement of the fuel canopy onsite; regulating visual aspects associated with public safety, along with aesthetic considerations. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: No aesthetic impacts have been identified; the size and scale of the project's components have been designed and placed onsite to minimize any impacts on adjacent properties and for passing pedestrians and/or motorists. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Any light or glare produced by this project will be minimal and primarily limited to glare produced by customers' vehicle headlights — primarily during evening hours. The fuel facility's lighting fixtures, both canopy lights and lot lights, are recessed and designed to focus light directly downwards, eliminating any potential glare or spillover onto adjacent properties or rights-of-way. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No safety hazards are projected and no views obstructed or affected by site lights or glare. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None; street lights and vehicular traffic are the only potential sources and no issues are projected from either source. 14- 06109 P:113000s1132451,planniny',Subrnittals',02 - SEPA 3 SPR - 2012-00-00',AssemblyTIN AL --- 13245-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-FNVR CHECKLIST -Renton Center -2 012-10-20. doc d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: The project is designed to address any such impacts - primarily through the selection of fixtures which direct light downwards, towards pump islands, kiosk and parking areas. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None have been identified. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No recreational uses or opportunities would be displaced by this project. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: With no impacts identified, specific mitigation measures are neither required nor proposed 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. To the best of our knowledge, no architectural, cultural or historically significant structures exist in the immediate vicinity of the project site. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None have been identified. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: With no impacts identified, specific mitigation measures are neither required nor proposed 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is served by Rainier Avenue South and is in the general vicinity of numerous other commercial arterials; access to Rainier will be provided through existing driveways. Please refer to the site plan for details on location and size of access drives and the nature of access provided. -15- 06/09 P;',.13000s%132451planning',Suhmittals',02 - SFPA & SPR - 2012-00-00'AssembIVFINAL -- 13245 -F -PERM APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST -Renton C enter -2012-10-20.d oc b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes ... METRO Transit Route 140 and 150 ... with service to the site C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Parking for employees would be shared with the existing Fred Meyer retail store, in the adjacent parking field. The existing structure is currently served by 76 parking stalls which would be eliminated under this proposal; leaving 1,314 parking stalls serving the combined shopping areas, including offsite structures. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? To date, none have been identified or required by staff. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No impacts to water, rail or air transport have been identified, f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The attached transportation analysis, prepared by Group Mackenzie, dated May 24, 2012, provides an analysis of queuing, trip generation and traffic impacts; pointing to no significant impacts on the area's transportation systems. Please refer to the analysis for specific data and a thorough discussion of impacts and methodologies used in the analysis. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: With no impacts identified or linked to the transportation system, specific mitigation measures are neither required nor proposed 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No increase is projected, aside from normal increases associated with commercial growth and projects of similar nature and/or size. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. No additional mitigation is proposed to reduce public service impacts. However the extensive nature of equipment, technology and training associated with this project, including levels of containment and systems previously discussed in detail, will serve to greatly diminish any demand for public services. - 16 - 06109 f'a1300Gs1132451plannrng',SuhmittalsV02 - SLPA & SPR - 2012-00-00'�AssemhlylFlNAL --- 13245-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST -Renton C enter -2012-10-20.d oc 16. UTILITIES Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. The site is fully served by all public utilities — including sanitary sewer. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. All public and private utilities serving the site are projected to have adequate capacity to handle demand generated by this project, with minimal connection issues. utility purveyors will include the City of Renton. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true, correct, and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or wi i ack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent Signature: (,; ' 7 Name Printed: N4& lVeA444 Date: / A� Ak- Zest -17- 46109 P:113000s'�132451plannfnglSubmfttals%)2 - SEPA & SPR - 2012-OMO'Asscrnblff INAL --- 13245-F-PERM-APPL-SEPA-ENVR CHECKLIST -Renton Center -2012-10-20 doc Printed: 11-01-2012 Payment Made CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA12-095 11/01/2012 03:48 PM Total Payment: 2,266.00 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: nr„ o;Uisra„ NOV - I aI] A fte#V Receipt Number: Payee: KROGER Trans Account Code Description Amount 3080 503.000000.004.322 Technology Fee 66.00 5010 000.000000.007.345 Environmental Review 1,000.00 5020 000.000000.007.345 Site Plan Approval 1,000.00 5022 000.000000.007.345 Variance Fees 200.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 29809 206.00 Payment Check 4999176 2,060.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000000.020.345 Park Mitigation Fee .00 3080 503.000000.004.322 Technology Fee .00 3954 650.000000.000.237 Special Deposits .00 5006 000.000000.007.345 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.000000.011.345 Appeals/Waivers .00 5008 000.000000.007.345 Sinding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Use Fees .00 5010 000.000000.007.345 Environmental Review .00 5011 000.000000.007.345 Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.000000.007.345 Final Plat .00 5013 00.0.000000.007.345 PUD .00 5014 000.000000.007.345 Grading & Filling Fees .00 5015 000.000000.007.345 Lot Line Adjustment .00 5016 000.000000.007.345 Mobile Home Parks .00 5017 000.000000.007.345 Rezone .00 5018 000.000000.007.345 Routine Vegetation Mgmt .00 5019 000.000000.007.345 Shoreline Subst Dev .00 5020 000.000000.007.345 Site Plan Approval .00 5021 000.000000.007.345 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence .00 5022 000.000000.007.345 Variance Fees .00 5024 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Approval Fee .00 5036 000.000000.007.345 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5909 000.000000.002.341 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 R1204977 941 000.000000.007.341 Maps (Taxable) 5998 000.000000.000.231 Tax ' Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 .00 .00 " . , 1 mmmzu (EXCEPT,01N # 1 3) 10 20 40 -1.11 I "I 11 "I 11 1-4 " ,��, ,.- �,o �,N. t� '.." '�- I "�, ,x ��� , �� ;�i��ii�rs "s : i , -� 'e'..��,7 , , , �N , � 0 )� 11� "I 14 ); \ � , I � 'e-11, '1� 10 114 .1 " ��;,5�, e '1� ."� el '5�51 I,--,' .11� .1� -__� "--**" 00 I.." � I,-," ,,-, 11 ,�� I I '1� - .. k3i�'�v. I 11--10 . Kii,. __ .1� ' , :' 1� " . " , - . - . . 0. eA.'.K%`,�' "'" * �tr� ��N, 11 ." --z".5 . . . . i .� .. .,� .,�� .; . . '11� g.,-.,� g I '. --**" &el'4 .. . , � SEE LIT " ,.,5 .. , , i� W IX �K: ...... "I - R. ...... ­ mi� 1-11 �,,-,,;�S�� . - � .."ll. -K — STORM ,,r�,::1,� F . - .,��.". "'N , "�,< , ­ - ,"Ill ..1-11-..... ,,�,��;­',:":�4," ";!' - '0`-,...g� ^­­-�--­�g' _ .."',7 , , --1 " "S..." K."'.". %�`R,­�-,k,�s � .. - , ,�,.,. � -­ � � � f ." , I , ­ -;----­.,�---: -.� .., ,--.,.-.-, _.*�' / m,�� I .z -, -,, -- -��, , , 11 "e" :,g,-,� 1 N .: " _,��.. ..-..-.,,��'.---,--,.. --sq'�, ..�� ." �\,--, , , -�,�,� ,�,, 'm , , _,�,*,�, \ I , "I �1111 � , . . ', I. _.:-�:,�, .. �: 11��Vmow=,­111% \ 7w \ ". 1, " 1�_­_- .. "-I',". . �.. � O'kITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN Am�� . . .b . . .,f—FUTURE RAINIER AVE. I � *��Z­ . - I--,' � � \ ", % \ _z �;� <5/l/ N " . . $ S� 1�,�-�- " \ I V* 4�0_�11_`, ____ - ___ "I-,, \ . � : �:.:_:__ -z - I -, �, , .1 .z \ \ .11� \ ,� \ \ ,1,0� 1-1 - . ,-;Zf I 0 00 . - - �,V V I . � �, .�, - � % ""I , � . � I . ::� N , � . .�, \ e.,,� % I . �,,�O. � , ., , �� "--- ,�"",%kzj., 11__,'� - - ,_��, d/ ,� " % , 0 � 1%�k 11.1 . I - ; 4; 1 . 1.� " " 1_1'11_1� 11-` 0 , " 4 - ,�\ \ A046aft ,,--' ,,,,--' " -,, . ." le -_1 51 , 0 1 % ' ' ,, -�,'.' ; I . e . � 11 -A \ \ 4 \ \ \ ,�---,-�,- 31, 4 - (1 7)CONCRET " ,<� ,,­- , -, -,- N, ,`- 1-1 I -N% \\ \� is V�11 el �-, �, � ;, 4 � "I 4 � J,/ I o'. � 1% '1� � � -:�i�l �,;,f %Wmj "I N, � .1, . . Q kjo "' 1� . 40rO "'r, 1*1�1 ',� - -` - . . A . ,.�-' -, �4, \ \\N& , 0 11�6 � � ,.,,,,I- - 0,4 , ., - -1 , , W . 1� . I . . � "\\� , . ��, � * , . \ , I$ "' �_� ' . . L, � 161 I .e - --;4. - �� � ..� " " T I 153 ",� .,,-,'�",!r"� e . � . - ", e I N ip 1� , " " ':� L.e \ �%k % It I e ' _' �� , _'�_ 11, " 11� 1� '�" � \ _____� 0:t� - EAS�MEMT ,--.. -.11 " , , ",., I �y� , �, , , '_ 's , : �� \ _111 !V '0 .4 :P 1:�__�1�4 61� UBLIC UTILI , o - ,,�� %"' � . \ ,�% i�� ,,,---, 6�;I; - , -, '. � V" * � -� . k � '. .;� �.� I / CF 00<"' '//`� 0 " " '. �; , 70ea ,�,;" " � ., . , . 1� ,a IV Rf �: N T 0 N P ETRO R E ICY toZ. ,-". . ., � e .� % 'N � , i:� 1. ,; 11 I 1_% �� f$� C; L �� " _� 'A P .1� �; I -,',;O� , ""'; � , " - --'- % % R �_ i� "."o 11 I -- � 1% � . - \% 'I ,,!� ,� '. , ,090749 . ".., Id- � %.s "'� 9 51 C 11w � \ . \ ,,IV 't, , _,0 le%5 ;;�� \ �> . ,_ ,� 1\ R� \ "� \ 0 , , � "'\I., 4 (EXCEPTION #112� -- '.. - - , �, .�. . " I�L ,,� -, , -,-� ,- , - - �,-- - &-,g C, N �� , ��o�_�11 -0 0 , ;_� . ,$\% � `� I e- 1( , �� ''. - � / # k - �� 1 �4,_ ,f A-, -1 " �-,, 'e,-- ,-�,',- , ".��,,- \ . ), - t; -e , .1 , .- , .-- m , _�, .It,�� ,,, _ - �, \I---- ,�. .0 A � V , , I',' - ,� ,,-,,,, .. 0 - /I I ­")\ 41k , , ,� �, 1� . , ,,, 'r; \ .0 \ 0 , �, " � ,� . I ;�, % .0 - * \ �,,., .4 � -I,- .- %.4 �J\ �o " " 1 13 0 lle�,_ ,-�,,� ,,;- " -�, ,,-o. ,�,- .,- "- , , - i�,��s ;� i� ,!�, � ,e '. ,,, �'� 1.1� k�z� ',-i�l � \ _ k� - \ , - ,,� ) �� \ , ,,, ., '71� 1 % 4 _.­�k , �, , , ,.-.� ,�) . . / , -111; , - � e 0, - - 63� \ � ;� ., ,�4 \ \ - 11 " ., "11� ',< \ I , � I 1:� \, � , %% N, 1� 1. . " " "'. ,�� ,O� %;Z5��l 1. , 10 , 't ,& .,., OP � , __1 ".6",;,e .� �� i N. . . k I I� I 5 14 ,� " I , �, ", I i::�� \� 0 , !�� -,. , ", \ "_�� ..,�,,� �k �� ,��', -.1 " " e ,�, . I SW5SO3 .14* 1 1 . , . I 1% x A \ 0 1 . �,_�11__101 - 11�1 ,,-�< ,,- �� W "t \\ � , i:�� ,!r I 1�11��_��_ _* /1-l", � 11 III -10 ......... � -110 � �- - �* d� -el- \ ��,,v \ - .--. N IsY ';C,,�.,�.�'., , - �, - -,,-; -, - '. ,.�� - '. . ---*' .. . , 1��t:�,�,,� 7 .. I ". e 11 11� )� \ .-- _1 ..�..-., , . "O" \ .,1 �, 1��_,_ - -I �; , -:.:. __,�F____ '. - :,��.,:�A " � 'ell____� \\," \ -----, - . . ,�,,� "I - ­, \ _., . V'�%,;,_,,--r'�.,--�. -,;Z��, � \ 1_/ % - ) . �, �, % N ",� ^' I , .. -� 4. 1 �' �, I I N 1� 1. . �.�� t . %� A-05 111�11 - �;,v - .1 " �, " 1��, , - k, ,0 - , �"% 1�� 1* ��,��-, , , / i� _. , . �', - N 4 , _,�,­,w -, .,-, �. , / I. � 1� �Ie � .4 . A � , �, d, "# , � �111_ '�' / 4 .1 !�, �, .e I . � .01, '1� 1� " . le lh�� I '� V .> e ig N1% � .1 .� � ,,� .,.� I 1, \ " �"" I " "I %, / �- 1, I , 1% ,� / \ .� � ,,�5 0, "I . I 1� 1�_ \ I �, � I ,�.11 .1�1:� j 11 N 1, <_ .1 . \ ,�� , 1� ,:�;p � ., 4 4 . %olL �� ,,,,,O* ;I \ . .- , _�'._ : e, 's. -�, ,,;�, ,�, - * " ... I , , ,�, -, �,'- �' -1 \ \ ,�� �, " , -, -, �� 'e" . . , �, el 1� , , �_ \ \ < ., , , .. � � " \1 .- -:,,�� �, X �, 11 ., 4� ;0 I I 4 e.- e .,.� e � -0 11 \ ,,,,- " " " -,I�. �,_ 11� . , I " � , � ., .r � ft.)." - � \ " , I , �� , " 1-1 ,- J, A14�1 - . ,7,.� '� .,_� �, I .�, \ 40> � , ., " -:04 11 e . 4. � � A, �'., I , ., .1 \ I .1� . � . - .�.4 4 ,,�� � '11� \ I/ ,e �, I , . .1 A \ 'I-,"* 1<4 > -10 , " . 40 - . � .� �� __� r, 's , , , , I " \ \ ",_ ,-_� " .-'� �i;,- . 11 1� ."� :7 . \ \ __ . . ;e , \ \ \ ,o� I \ i; ) F ,,�\ ,�_� U (), \ ,> ,-0 ".., '1� \ ,,� \ . 01 ... ..— __\-,_- -...-,. - '�� "_� . .,�., '1� I--,, ,---,\ \ . \ IV leo ."� .10� N 25 ,,--' V. .1� "', \ �S- . 11� :�� \ \ \ 110, ,-_� \.11�. \ \ \ *1 .1� '1� \ 'IN\ \ "o I-,' \ SO , .,-� .,'� \ % S, \ 41 \ \ \ I \ \ \ 'Ile 'S. .1 .I- % , , .- " �, \ , � " , .0 , . \, .� 1k. A, � , \1 %I 't I % 11 N % It It 1%, 1% 1� '% IS S x I 1� � \ 4 � '� % -0 IL � � e I % 1�, 11 0 % Ll 11. % % ( '% \ -.0, � �, , 11 - 'e/ ­;.., �� ,�� 10 Uh) f1 '�%, U- I %I )� �N I I 11 , �,.�, vll� I 11" .z, 11 11" " 1;1 " `I-". )�,� ,,,,A, "k,", "% 10 " %% 4 50- ", '�L \ 1�� -V . SA, CUT 6 , 11 -11 \ ,�,,O;fl�- '\� CURB LIGHTS TO ,-;=-,,�, , % '%�\ (TYPICAL) ,.,,� \ I N% 1-11 _--� 0 �N 0 \ ILLUMINATED 1-11 RDC 1_*1 DETAILS. 11.^ \ .1 SIGN. SEE SHEET A2.0 .__1 1-11 %1L I ------ It .11 �.� ,� . NEW 1�'k's, 8 1�11 FOR .�, if �' P LANDSCAPE 1% �,, Disk File: N\ /I '411, 'IN 1_,�� A I -e 1-1 el-�, 'S. .1 .I- % , , .- " �, \ , � " , .0 , . \, .� 1k. A, � , \1 %I 't I % 11 N % It It 1%, 1% 1� '% IS S x I 1� � \ 4 � '� % -0 IL � � e I % 1�, 11 0 % Ll 11. % % ( '% \ -.0, � �, , 11 - 'e/ ­;.., �� ,�� 10 Uh) f1 '�%, U- I %I )� �N I I 11 , �,.�, vll� I 11" .z, 11 11" " 1;1 " `I-". )�,� ,,,,A, "k,", "% 10 " %% 4 50- ", '�L \ 1�� -V . SA, CUT 6 , 11 -11 \ ,�,,O;fl�- '\� CURB LIGHTS TO ,-;=-,,�, , % '%�\ (TYPICAL) ,.,,� \ I N% SHEET A2.0 _--� 0 �N 0 \ ILLUMINATED 1-11 RDC ,,, IS ;% kiL DETAILS. 11.^ \ .1 SIGN. SEE SHEET A2.0 .__1 \ %1L I ------ It .11 �.� ,� 'S. .1 .I- % , , .- " �, \ , � " , .0 , . \, .� 1k. A, � , \1 %I 't I % 11 N % It It 1%, 1% 1� '% IS S x I 1� � \ 4 � '� % -0 IL � � e I % 1�, 11 0 % Ll 11. % % ( '% \ -.0, � �, , 11 - 'e/ ­;.., �� ,�� 10 Uh) f1 '�%, U- I %I )� �N I I 11 , �,.�, vll� I 11" .z, 11 11" " 1;1 " `I-". )�,� ,,,,A, "k,", "% 10 " %% 4 50- ", '�L \ 1�� -V . SA, CUT 6 , 11 -11 \ ,�,,O;fl�- '\� CURB LIGHTS TO ,-;=-,,�, , % '%�\ (TYPICAL) 'I I i \�i, \ \ I N% SHEET A2.0 N& 1.5 1�% ks 0 �N 0 \ ILLUMINATED �N 'j� ,� %S RDC ,,, IS ;% kiL DETAILS. %� t� V. �Ilk kk \ .1 SIGN. SEE SHEET A2.0 %� %'% -0 � %, \ %1L I ------ It .11 �.� ,� . NEW 1�'k's, 8 I %L � NNA it FOR .�, if �' P LANDSCAPE 1% �,, Disk File: N\ /I '�" 3: 10 'IN 1_,�� I � I 1.�' I i % 11 - '4 __ I t V�� \ , A ,11� I � t ...". % , %� 19 �,5 : : ; 4f 1 �, �- 11 - , ,1 -�'�' ; �, ... I", 10 �\ t f� -, � �� I: �'A 1 1 .., -X 1A % 0 , . -.'Ii , . ., 73:, ?�` 11\1 �5. -, " .,� P� - I- ,-, ." �.� .�,,'��"? ,1 - . N\ 11 _'. \\ 1% : - , , '11� -,""�- , 1, ­ . "' 1�1_,�51 . ...... � ,�. A", � \ " , "I , \\ I/ 5:7x-ilill"�.�.'*.'il� �1>'11'1`,i- , I ...... , -�'�I � I I -.1 1 ,� - 'A , - -,."��'.��%;";,. �._- "'... % - \ � %%\ 10 4.�,x ,,:�,x-X4.� fil .� �� " . , . . I qN . , , ',�" , � u:::�%` ., . * -� , -�,�,�11'1, , I - � .)% I M ." \ " '> � !� I , , 14 �,�V4�-:�%-Xl ... �51',`.,�*��,`,,,,�,,,, ;` ,�-%,l ,., , I � 'I , � � -�� 1-,'..i ,��.��,..,-. I i � - , -i?��, , - I.. x,Q- � I , .. , , k . \\ ,\ 'NDSCAPE --/ , ,:->;-:,m� ..,z1;:i,%'; �, _'�.� 1. LAW ;,:�X�,%, ': . , _1 I �11- , , , . Colo t !,��, ��-i: . ... ... _;-, . ,.,: J. '�­`�-­,--,�N .", ­­- . ,;,n:­�kx� ,� . ,.� , , " "", �,.�,�,,--..-,,, g, . 5�,S- �1�1",`­,­�"` , K ..��:�.,-.,` � 0100 \\ �,�'..;�,§.'-.�� ,g,��.. . - - - ..�, . -m.--��,--,i %'%� . �',,,: " 6 -- . . ��::",�;:!:,, ­: - ."""', � \ I im - 1,1115 11, �� '' .� .1 - I. \ -, n , , % -M��.,.-!�i��,, .1.11-- .U� �k, �`�111 : �.��" " 10 . . _.-R ��..­-',,'.'-',`"% � �NMI���N�`��i!l:, It �k -Q. . " '� " " - 1�f, ""' 11..: 11\ _.--*­� 11�-�,�'n'�;,� " - "O _�' " "I'l,"1z _��_,,__ , "" "��,,.,,,�,�,k"-.,..".�.,.,.....�'. " ­�111 I . � iz,,R,-�,�-,*"'­�-Ilm �-, -.1-1 N , . ",.",.�,�...,.�.1-1"��l..-,��-.,>i''�,- %:.. . � "', "I *-­ ."'I'l I. - ,'61 -_.`____-_ -.� .. .... 1 \ R. - �, " ,�.� ;,-, " -, -MM�, " .1 - M - ­� � �_,�_ "S� �-n: , . "I., � � �;11 `_1 �_�,�;-,__ �_.-O_�, - . I zf.'R�,��,, ..__Icl�. - &,X� --;-,.� ;�U­� �X �'. . .-� �_,4 I'll x,,��Iz\ C�' �....I. �6v � � .�l.*",",-..,-�-.".*��..�.�,,�",��"".,-�,�"",.....', � : - ..., _ " 1X`R-:.1X1�:1*,-:1:- I , �� �;. , . ­�,_ � .. , "..'. ...., � _�� . % � ... % 1� "­ , .: , Z "?. 'i g, \ "O"7 .�, , �_ ......'. , 41 , '�i' '��`� 4 . �,\ ­,."...'..- .... .� ... �� I \1 , . . . ....... pt _ Ral _�'.'�.,.--'��',,'- -� � * \ I , ... W�, . ', , , ", �� -, , ,��"� �.� .'I,.. I �. �,-�'11-,.,',-' . -1.,.`,.,_...,.., ", I � ­­-- .',� Mi. 1"..."., �0 .1'.'.. - ,'.'.11--,..- ..1 ,,, - -1.11- " - .1 :�:��;-I�-ZX R" , ""' , .��.--�..-'� --.,�',,--';:� I . - � I �­ .g ,., g 9 � 11-7.1 Z­� _ \ o�-_��M,1�1�1�"'��',� 11�i",: �:",., ��-- , .­;:� -,*��,��11 `�` 1`-`_10.1�1�1'1 , , , , 4. 'k�� __ ,,,.,,., ... .8 __._ ��,! , - � f, , , 1.­�'.­,.�..­ . " . ..,: . 0 � .. ',_ .1.. � \ ��\ - - , , - 5 \ is -.1."--'.., .n', 11�.. . � - I �� 11 � ... ",.-. I '.., `� -4 . I , ­� " "' , "' :'*`--.';", , "' , `�' , "' " � ., .. �,N"'��' "'' " "� L,--,\ , , .711.. ,,,,;� � . � "', ., " , , ­A,k�� "', . ",.",�l,-'-�>�-'�-��-:'�.'-'�-,-.'-�-��-..--'-',",.-., �-,-� I '­-I�- .-�' . ,��l . . ,`,*��,,`i"i ..: - " .i .. " % ,��j \ 0". �,,'---.i-5,,.�. ,­_,�',­ " , ". , ;.�,�,-,�,,�.,--..�,--.-..-�,�....�,��,,�� - 1-1 .., , ... � 11 ".U.1>4.1 *`,_'�, I . �, �-, " -.,--.?,,, I .1 I - _1 . `�" - - , ........... - . I """"' "', , 1, . , N: �� R`�,*-`>� _ ­� "' , " ,N`_`,i, ""' _`�"_" , , , � " %�j � : "���,-,�.,"'.,',,�;'*"',�"", , _ g " � ,� . - \ i i �,, .- ... __ g , ­�,;.,7.k �� �_ i_`,` '. ., 'm -1" , ,�, , " � , , �\,�R 6 , . 'm .1 . ." I . k" MM,,,�% -,.... . .... . L '_��, ,got,�*& 11�-',�W,', ,�"n��\,-�-',�-,;� .*"".�,-.�.��,�"",-i��"""�,�.-�,��,�,�- -...,­--,Ex--..--x ��,�:. 00"...lAk +. k_1`11�:_'*.'��'11' \ , . , I - - - .-,, i""1.111.,: , � , , ", -, ­-, , � _�.,�� IM . - �­ , , " "' --- � I X. .I �.: . _Qmml�.,. .1 "-,- " , ­ .,. , " ". z I %\ % , ­��`�` -1. ,�. .1, .,,�..".�,.>-:',,�,,�.-, ""�,-�,-..--.�"'.., ,,-�,H,M.1'. �,.,�.,���n�,',,��,���.,',�-',"-,'���'���-".,� ­-­-­.­­-. - , W"P., I - ­ " �`;,�" . \ ` % ,�, �'-zR,, _-, 4"'I'l ,I, ­� " -,�, 11 , , ,,, . , ()_ , �. gg%,"igl� -,-�, �. N-',,',X,�`��X \ '), ,,, . I I - . I I . f " . I., -�-�-��--�;--,� -i3.�',.,`-.,' "'.", .." t �, '.".-'.��",.f.""���'...,,,�,�N�. -.,�.,.;j`�`--�' - . .. 'i��. 'Z�;;T� �� " � "' - .,,* -" -*.,, - . "'. " """ -:-:-�t.,,T�..'."...,..,..)�,�,-'�.-.;--.,�,�-,�,,-...-�'.,"�"'.'.,.-�...'�'.��",,".'�'..i � � % I , -, . - -- -�- - -� -� . ...., �7 I , ��i�� Z� � . . , '( I : � - . . ��.-.�,..-. gm �� " � �. - �WMX.%'-, 0. � .;,., , I 11, " �\ \ k *-X �,x­,­ VN�: " " , " -, -g, � ,�. L -�. -�"'�",;,L-.""e�".�--.,.t�,� �11i.,-,.�-.� ", , ­`Ri ,,�, " - ....f. .-� .. .. . V , ., �,:"�i:-"::�g-"�,,�:�","�.";��� .I, , .. - ., L ....R ... .... K, - I,- " � - - - " - - -*-` -, - `�,- .- � %­ 1� .- �-,,§,:W�1110 m--'�-, -e.t-�,­g,� : .--.- -,-;�<-I.­ ­!­�,,, 1� -,.."R� .,m ------.1, �, f .R. - � _gg�g._'Ii ,, ..-,., .- .,- -� -.,� ,-,'-� ,i� - 'I , , V 11� 11;- F, .. " I 1.�._ I 1� �� � .% Z�., . 0, . , 11 I " . ,_� �, � .I.,11 " � , y -i\ \ .... . . " , ­� .<',5�:5",5,��"'�5���,��"'�'s "' 'B� I �" " "5 ., . ", .g ".. , '. '. -'- ­.� -- " - , - _�,Z, ., � ." - ­.: -S­.N..0--Xn-- ".. ,-�-', \ IL . . , 6 �,k;.�;.-,��Xq. ��! 41, t �-. ,��.fi ­­�-,?�-�, `., .n'�"­`;- - �*,',, ",'�'z � , , ,\.. , , , �,�.'i�� �-Mll � ... :,1­1..1.,.,�.,1R1., Y.M. . 0 % '. . 'I " - , 1, .�. " "" . - , '.' I I I , ; " ... L ­­ I 11 �, - . k�l `_..11'1�`�P .. 1i 1!��"`�""\�"'-1-11 7 . .. - i .- "­�'� �_11'�­1'1_n"_. .�-_-_-_-"'1 �,�� 1 ., , 1.;1 � �,�Z,�.�, .. , - , � _ :�'. "' . , ­%--,,�Ii.. illl';,�01.-"N'�-1�1�;� ,.�����.,".�,�'.-I!i�-...-'�.-..- ,� � , � , " 3 "' I --<t. -g, :�'.�,.�,.",?,.�-. " . �. . . u $ .�.i�".:, ,,,�. ,.,�&, " - " "m �, Z�. "' - � -g , , R0 , ,�. ', ,,-� .-, 14' \ .t 1� I . , ,.,j. �. .. \ ­ � � , 'A� .- 11 111. I �11_1 -1, .1 \ 11 I% I 1, I 41' .", .111, . I , , ,� � 5 .. % �\ .. �% * . V � - '.R��: , g ., " '�v , . - � � -� ,�:' . - 11 .�,; I_ .11, "..'­j'w'�g'%z,�g, *�,,,',, ,;�,� . . . , " .-- - V I . - i���,�,����1-1l'-"..,."-�,�,�",,.",��.����,'�-1:� �111`��'�`-.,-",�,,,��.�, - ". -.,�.-,..-.-­ , I u "" , �` - -, " , " ., W .y '� 5 '�� ','� "�'% - "' `� N,,`.� ,�---.--In� -, .-,,- -, ... " g - -, "I , 91. , � -1.11, IV - , 5 . , . , , ,,, g�, ,0�.,. li��,� � - � .:,,� , * -, IM" ,�,i::: : .� -,�. ��.i-,& .#--.1-11, = ,MR ��,.'�'..�;�,�,,����.',,o-,��-.� 1,�� �.,, . '11\ -;� g-�;�� -,� �'..R- �' "", ., ,I,-... ��_,_6,1'il­,�i,�-- :-:.��...,,��:­,,:, ,,-�X,X,� `�-""_' .: \ ., 1'� - -__ \ 4 . ,,,,,,,, , e I - " � I illl',`-�'g . '.' -- "'! � - �1�1�1_"'��:��111'� � -�,",��".�-� .. � �5 .1 � M, ­­ � � -,,--,--,- --t jx ,- � -.�.' �,�i�,'-i� .Z��. ----- �,-,�;,�",����,,,�',,�",.;,.-,.: 6 , --- -- ---- *- � - -�_ ?n,�,�,`�,,�M_ . 0 .... 14 .�. _g', �., � - ,_,�' .", � ., � ..... " , " �i.'g'mi.,�� -,--..,m --,5� . .11 - �F �:�"­"­­.,." W - 1� -1, .. , , %,�','.� ,---,`,R�,,.> - � ,1, ,,� . . C u, _ , � . -,r g " 0, 1k N ". , . _ . S,.,&�, .,,�,, 0g. g..."'. ,-�,,,_6. IST \ ..:ff:1 .. ._� � 5'. - >�,;--m',"'.'&l ,",,�, mk,,,�. .., . k 14,% , �t% V> >50:x* �`,X,,�?* ", ii�'��:*i�:��i,��,�11, - a ­-­�g--,m-, .­. . .�', N�'���IIINM 1 n �,,.."'..."'m '�'ll'i�.�'.�'..,"�".:,.,�,�,-�.",,:",."I.i���-11�',>-,� ,� a W'X " , "' , 0- " . 00�1: �-,��`�'�-i�,�'�� ,�­,R-S,, . . . ,�P,<_-,;,, 1* 1� .�,�.'.".�.�:�,,-%,,�,;-��4��k.,��,��,�45�<,q X,-.-��5 ., &� -m� """" 6,�.'g -N`*--�--"� %, - - , I %\X % u1m,* �M,:-N4�:R' _` .. , - gg5g__.1�11' ,N," -t,,�-�, .,,��i�.� "I"�'ll""..��-.11"..�,>�l".,�", , ,e � g&� , .n., .. �,xm; " � , \ \ .� ��,:�C.;��4- g, g A� I '�` _-.1.15 . W. .,� I .......... ,.. , � '5. " .,%,� � . m 1, ,,,�, I ...."'.. �,",%-."..." .11 -1 --1 .i -,"'I -�`�,,,�,� ,,, - �, �, -� ., �_`;_`ffi ��_`t , 1-�1,1 -"�__,5 ill%�."< 4 , L 0, �% - _ , " I ,�, " ..�11.,,,1111, .1-.'�--,1x1"M,-,'k �$�,��-� . -NA-.-1 , �--��,.'g ...... �,.%,,.,,,_,.,,:.,�., t��'i, X�_..,,� 1% .� §'­�,­. I 11 ,� , . ­�\,. - --"-. -- ­�--- ­--­---­ , -g -, - -. - -, .. f . * I . _�. -'��m,­, -, -, 010--.-I��,�� - � ... .�� . z,n��-�.�.�,­ , ..� , , " ­K� ,��l.'.,"�,����,,���,-,,,,�,,,��/...� , IL ,�, � --,�,.-.�-� .�,�. � ..'u. %,,,L, L,.,-., " , , "' , - � V . ., �g , ,."" � . 4 .,. L .. .... '"..."". "'N� � �� ... I'M � , ". .- , - - !"�.��.gg� 9'��---M , ,Mi I- -� . ----- ­ - .----- 11 i lk: - - , ""' - ­`� .. I'll . .�.. I. . _,'. ,4._ .,..-,.,..,..,., ... .;:�.�,,�,,..,,�,'.��?,�'�,��,��,�-�-.��.;,�,�,�""-.�--.�--'�...� - - � -� " - - . , , , , - , -,>,.��,>-.-.��.-,...�-.-,..,�., ,..'�..,_ �� ,,�. . " 1" , NO . - I- .- � ", ., - - - t, - . � \ .1 W "g,11,., I_, . ...... I . .1 - " _ � " �, . . - � � "", ., 11 �`Illffii,N,1 � 110 1A , . y � ''I 11 .. . _ ­. _,,;.. " - , ­* ..... . ,,m -,M"-,,,,,-"- "'E, �-'.,"�'�,'*'.��', .K �ZZ��5�,-,�. - ; ­,��, 0 1 1 ��.,� .,--.� R­.-�.\�,�-.,�,-- _ , . ..� .�&x - ,> , - ,­ 1 `_'1'1'1�`1"1­, " , - p �j 14 ' 1;.R.. _�, _ . .�, '' , m \ , . , . , ,,, - 04 . .. 4��7 . - ' : '�,�`. .1 - � ill" � .., I "'In li 1`1�11�1� _�." -1,11 K< , " ". - , , , " " * , � a .. % � 11 �, -� ...., ­i��,� 1 4 - ,,�­ izml.mm � ,111111 11� �,, , I * . ­ 11.'I� , 11 I I I -� ...3 " " . I . _`­ .. 1_. - " .:M , , " 1. ,_,-� I , �,,-, ,"J": .. 1\ I 4 .5z 4 ,1; - N '� "I ...... C. %% � . - , - ,,,,, - " � I I � ,� , \ \ .. . a . .. , .., � �, ::. 0- � 'L ��--.'-� 1�. ,�� I \ I � \ ,,- ' MATCH s , -- .el .1�1 EXIST . ,-' "., 1-1 11� .11 11-1 RAINIER AVE14UE FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS �, r, RECENTLY COMPLETED BY CITY. CONDITIONS � ,MAY VARY SLIGHTLY .. FROM PLAN. \ I \\ � I �k E_X1t,3T1NG COMMUNICATIOR. % '-VAULT TO REMAIN wt � t \\ VXISTING LIGHTS TO . REMAIN (TYPICAL) \ \ - : - I -., >�,-;�.:,M'1111��­ .1 ., ;-- q � 0 .<1.11 _�p '­';Z�, �,­ - \' " �"_ � . , ,i\ , �, , I I . - 1�"-,_ 11 �-' I- , , - . 9 - .1 I W--" M . .1 .� , M -M -..T*'��,-_V" :,��, . %? Ca .. g � I� � , �10 '� ""�,�`,' - W . " . 1, . - . ", 't" 1� I., '01" L". . I , I .. . , ,�. " I . "., , A \ " I i. _� ". A � �`>$,'j �---� -",�-\-", A � :- - \q ,�",:��, k 8 - . - . I . " ,� "M """"'N " , � b ... A, . \ % Li� . .,;. , . , "R, ,,,, , , "' ", * , i 4 , il*,,,,�'.-.i� `,"Mk-:�,-,� . . ", I Ill, "N' , . . I LOGO , `,E;11-.�� �� ',��� 111 . . I , . �::�, 151 , . . .. . W . "S - , . � 4 1 " � "_. , , , , , , , `��R�,-,i,�,'�,­,,� . 1,r,,,�1%3�` - ,-"- '�_, i�� , 1 4. . : . .­�.,.�.,�.. 11�� ,����������..'..,.�-�,�,�ll,�k,�.""..�l.,:�.��-1,��,-11�,�� � \ . . , 11 . - - .. . --- - - ­- ---,. — . , �i_� - _� , �_, r ", "O . - - . . ­ ­ Ai - I - . %­_ . I., I - .--. . 4- - - . ., . r�,.,,,�,,g ., ,�N -- P - -A - 4. - � ,6 . : , �, , . .p,, . - . , . r r _ . ', ". ­ , ��e. .� �. " . . 4 .71 I., - �, .�., , .,:� 4 I - - , , - ��'n .'- I . .. � , , - � ,�--,,�,,,,�,,��L�,�.,�L��i--.��,�.--���.�-,-�-...!��:� , . . , _., �-- �-"'��5., � .. � . � , . I rl��. M - - " , �\ I . .. .1 " I -,x. .11 ," I .q - Ill., _L. ,,,,.,;,-� �,g�-� .. . I .. ` . � :%�.' .*,-,��.��5;�;�: 1 , Im :. � . Z`11�� 1*1 L, . I Sw ,�. , - ,� �- * . ' �" r '""" 5�i,,5 `�,,` `*,�','.,`,f. - 41 � ;;-y 8 LAN CAPE I ". �� :--i�liiE��,�"? ;��,,0' , -,�--�,�,�,.,',.,'�-,.,,��"""-�--.-.,��.-,.��,����",L, ,,, - 4W "��, ., �.��, - - .. V_I , r I . , A . � 06 -Ar 1% % � , , 1:1,4!1.�`� '�:,-�-,�'O.,�,.-;,.- , .4 I\ % N .11>1 W A . . '6 .4 12 , :. ' :" . .� & . 0 - . , % . :�,, - ­...X�l . . . . . I .1 4 �:.,,'� ,� tr W . . , , `x . I .. . �.,�--�.-.',��,.,�;.:���.'.�.�,,,,,�:���-*� . : ..... . . ' '� I I iL I , 1. . I . . I '� %t N , I . . , , . . - .� .( - * 1%, 1� , I I M .1 1'�, , " A '.. .. 4 '13'1�1 .�, 'I" , . - .� 4 4' 71 \A x � _18, 4 'D - -.k .; "I . I / \ - .�_.�,I.,- -�I.­­;-�� 04 , . ��.'n,j� .� ILI N\ % " , .. � I ) 4- "I .10 , . I % . I -1-6 'k a . I . \ � ri ,,�% N R "... . 4 1k I '� � `z " 1��, .,., . 1 4 -�� � �1 �k � .1, .11, ,��i,_M"W,'� � , , - � _ 4 . -_ . A .� , . , \ZIMM- .� �..,� M.'�� ?��,��::�X ... ­­._ 'N' . . . : . K �? ,�� m ,M� �-,�� - . �% % I a t� 1 \ � ., I 'R R I.., ..� :��%,� . I L) , .% I MATCH i \ , -g- . ,11�.,� , �.' R, , 4 , "' N !" "��, I.. - . . ,.,,- I % -, ", , q , � . �, " _'..�.-.." - . . I ��`0'11'1* . . I - - -- - %% Ix., I \ . (� - -�� ��,��-t,-,�;',z-.,�':���,--,�,,�i�,�,�".".,. . .. . � -� � .. "'i- � ��"�, 6' *e ��-,,. �.g " m I . - I . . .. 11 i , �, I A& . . . ..-1-.,.1--.". , % ,:j:Z. .. . a . \ 11\4 1 \ N"N. . I " EXISTING ,�, " _-1 ,�,,�.',�:,,',, OS,.,'. " k��;.-�.xj- - � . .i , , � % A t�% . , � 0 1 1 �j: I .� . ` ____,�- .;;!: `�,.<P"�-., - � ".., " `:� ..:;il . . ��,"�.�..:"","!� lrwjwuz� k 1% I ��,�*`�._�_-.��","L�� . A. , �, �k ,.O,�W,,:��;: I . ........ .. . I I - I ­.­ - . N, % 0 . "' - . , -�r,�--x-- - "­�"� ,""" ..1�11'-� "`,�� � .~ I 'I , .... . If ._--�, 4' " , ,­�­�N, 'A ...ft , . \ � �,., " "', .- -.1". 4 ! k � `,:R�`.,*N , .el k .;­-­­­�,�.,� �;.�, , �,,&­ ,J"-,.��,-",."`,�­ " � ,­ .. �­ , .- -�- 1".. I , � ." �,�", ,!!� �0 . - ��,�._ - - ­ I ­�.,, g� g�­ ',� ',`& *.�,', , ,,, I � . � - .-..g,. 4 . :.', , I ." ., ��1,14,1!ii � ..# \ - , A , - ,�-. , - ­-, ,�-",,'�,L��,,��,"�'��'.�-'��"i� �'&;S��, , " , I � , I 11� , �...�.,,.�,,,,..,,�',--,.,,�,iiz.'� �:,�-�`�,�,,��--�W,N>1. . , - ", , a ,�,- " ., , '. ,g��­� . , k\ %% -1", " -­­`�� _�, ',� � ,� . � , , I *� I I �, , . \\ % -ROL�'-,.�5-x -.� ,., �;� "., , , , ��_�` `Qi -�, . _ L , lot �_ -�1-1.11_ ,R-� , '� ,�, . .-, A a ,�- ""' , I " � 1� -"�',_ 1 ",'� � .. L 6i . �: .,;�-LI$11',L!��fl — - ., ,.�Z.i��.?,.�.�'.."'�k,Y-%�'I'l.".'�-l""I', , . , ., k - , . 'A I.,.,:: �� I "., A%%\ �_ I . ` `Z��k.'�,'.�"",�,i�,,> _ :�� , , �. - \ ,� .'N,�,.'.' VP - - (-A , - - � 1.0 ,,,,,��,,��.�����.�i.���,i!"�,,�.%-- m,M<,x�-,�,:�, ..151"� - I , �-,'�,��­ <," , " " "� , � % � �kv\ . .9v . I ,�. - , � L.. � , , - . I ,,, .. _� , , , "' " " _` . 1x* , : , '­',.-,-�-,­ ''I _-N� 'I �_ . " '� "k , . , .1, : " � ,� �� ., �i I I .. "'' I -_�;, -';_-�`��','.� ,01��'.,� . ,_ . 1.�� . I .. - % , I � -­��X':­",'," . b, , . r':� ,,-.�,,rr - ,�� ­� - !r.r�%�n:�-. � !LL ­ .... ... . 77�,�� ,�", g...�"-�.­ 0 , -11, , , . ,-,,,,_,,,1,,',,,` ,,,r,,.-, ", \ � . ", _"��-,­`.�'_,'L�--�_,17§. I P �' . � r ��ia--,,.P,'.�",."�,: . .. " ,,,.'I,`,. - � , ., � ?-.1.1 -,�` -1 .�-�* .,,,�M�>, �",�'-.�,'>,�­,-­-­ � " ": . _ . �, - , 1.� " � -, ". . — - , , ,..,.,. 11� " 11 - � . 7�g�, 1 I - �1� ,� " `-16, � .." 11"11,11, " 1 L x I I I ��'Ii�1�111001ii!m;� ,��i,�,&�-�'.' ­­,�,,' ..­_­,_ L " .1 , - X _ � I , '. �� . a . L" , , . . � i I �N �, � L3 _ �. _�, , � ,�:�� e_�,�- -16 , �tsamm -,*� .010' ,, "", - , , > ., L.R %�, r - I , 11 `�� � . \ 4 � , ,����,�'L",�.��-"L".L",���,��,,��� "", " :� .N� .: ­ � I ., r,\ .�� �, , 11 U.'.." :;�!�`S,'Zp, I": ", `�,' ". il,� L � �0� , _ I .. � �R,��*�'.��', >'� � 1""',.,;,",.5, �"�,,,". .,-L." L' L - - _ '­ . "N �% I 11E., - "_'� ­­ - g '�-,.- -.",­ -�.-� - ". " , '� ,I � kj�::� I. I ' L ­� > _ ,.,. .", N t%',�,,­.,��,,.�-_-,�.- � .>­­ , - "" r, , " '". "" , . "I ��: " ", I ."L '. L .,. ', �. , > I - . . . _ ... - , �,_M`IL -.111", I gi � I � .�.­ � . , ,", 21 1 . - .j, :.� g ��, �11. , ,".�'. "I " - I I ", � ". \ ' , � - g -g g".�.� '_,g��,��g � , .", .-L"g ., ,e5_ �..�.-;r.,-,,-.",.k,.";""."�.,.:, ;?gg � I � � "I � �.�, _.,,�' �'-- ���I'll"�""L-"."...".,"�-,�,� �1� �11j�1111,11`�;� ` "", - "'E " ,,- " � �� .. .. 1� ��, -��, .,,� � � �� -­ , " 11� - � 1, , % %% I �,�, �,., - , . g,�, �.,,--i ��, W R - L - : ..�L> i ,,I�, �L� , 0 ,- '�101-��'*-�,'�,.*,� \ . i R - - - - �', ",L,� ., - --�, " - 'a '�, 3 ,�111��'� ,'� , '.'� '�g ,.�, " ,�� , �-� �:�kz:,� � ,���z�k��,�-,,��-,:��-,�'�"�-.'-,�� "-� '-,'�:�>.�"4'�',�.'�"',��'�"-:L, A _,,�.�:,�,',.,�', ...... ��_.,�'., % �"'�,-�i,`?ffl, . . , . - .. , �� -� u,,�%, E�I T NG 0�*AS METE �i:-�:,.'&,�� " " " . �.�M�� - 11, - � ;� 4.�-,-_. - ,.*. . , '1�iR40 :< I SWALE , i - , 1.11.1'....., > �,_., - ��-�--,� .k \%$ kk I \ 16�-Xm'- , , , 6�4 "MrR, -r"�."�'�"""ki-,',�,,.��...."-,�..�I " w ,�"'X I I , "I" > - . . "�,.,,� Ll� 1-1, . ''. `,i�"',�_,N ��.��.:.�­_ �:. , , . , . " ,,, " - "", ."."H ,,,,�,`�--N­�, L N � .�� I - ,__ .. ..... L ..'.. \" ' " ,� 1-� . . I f�l ... I g' '; ." m �, .,�� ,,�4 - . . " '� _"g_"-' .-. \ 'k �...�,k:� , . I ' Ry, to.'-,g,�,'.-g---.,, !<, Xlil .. . 4 Q �\W'.7, :R.1�-,L`.',,: " '­"'-.'.'�-_� ,,.�.,­, -_.­' ,­, 1,,- 1,11, " ,,,�.,.,�'...�-..-L.,.....t-�,,� .�ffl IR '��'.. ,."��',�'L.� ", ­'­­ "'�'.,5��,�,�-,�",��".,�-.�,�-.,-,,,-�--��,,��,.-�,,-:�,�:,�,,��.."Z!�?��?�-�,�,.����,.,����'� k ,�, -11, - . , , " ", _� �. �, "'' . � _... - � _L. .. , 16 \\ I , 41 `� " _ _ �, _ ,_ _ . ", "' "' " , , _., I _ 's .,� % " . , , , , , '� , " - , '-' "I Sm , , , . _.�:, '. , 11.1" li-�l.'�,����-���,�ll""�,�."�".�,�.,��'.�,,�,��'..�,��,�.�.1-1"�"".""-- , . , . . 1A1'_\L ­i�%,'A, ..g " a. % L 0;�'R�NP;'>11$10." , 1 1 � � � MN�,,�,�, \ I - , \ 0.11 '� 4 1 11.\_ .� . , , \ . .: - , �� . . " . ,� . , \ ?v, ,I \% % I � , ". " . ..... �- -, -,-,.,-_, -, _,__-'� -,�.� . :, - -��I .., , � �, "', " - " �� . , . � � � " � , , , - : . 111��, � 2 - km� �'�Nml % . �., . "" , � � m:' \%, EXIS1 NER HAND _!, Tj I, 1�x - x�- ".3%­..­�.' -�k�.',,���>'���,�'�'�,,','-'-'�\'�'�)."""*'.'.\��,'-'��-�L'�-��">,'-'-,'-�,.,-� �7 , -, . "I � "" '11,`� %\ N � ""�,'-,",,',"-,--"";\""�",,,--�, 'I` " 21�` " -1 -1 .,�.y�.��,,-��""-.1.�,',,,.,.,�,�",5�, :��,,�"."., . ,,__ r."... ,13_-....,�_,�-�,."`_-'. �`l , "I'�,'���-�.,��,�lil��,���-..-: ,,11'0�'Rlm'_`�"' r 'm . , ., I.." : 11111�N k .. . ;. -M�,, . 1,,� � _m I �PLE "I'* "I'Ll"', ',�`11 . �,1-i-N, . ._v _1�,..�_E 1"'1Ki*"1._1.`1�1_-.. -"-.�".Yl�"\.���,��.�>��':�.'� '111i_ir`��* ��'..�-"L,L""".-,������,�l:,.,i,.,".�,'��-I :;�; ::,Js:i . . .11�11.-,�, 111, . , - . ,�,�.,� " � . " '. ,�.� �,� �� � . . .. .. _ � . X. ��, 4 ., .. �� �' - : I V% - --- - , g'. -g" .',�' , , . - ­-­­ -- - - in , ,,,,� - , ��;�� ;� . ". , , , .,� , '. , . ,.,: , ,� '. L ............. I " �' ,'r,"r," \4 , . : � . I � . g". - -� " , V , . ." ,\ , , ­­ I -A ,� NECTION '� , . _0 ff � 1, . 1, k j ­ , - - . . I .� \ * .2 ��-���ip�%�-�i��\5�,.?��'���-�.,.,--,��-�-.��: :,;�:.,,,:;:,::,.�--.:,�:�,:,.�..� �. - � At I " Irl ?� � 1`.`��'�111'. ., . . � _;,_ .-I - , _`� , .."',-, .,,,.,, .. �, n � 1�--k . ._ �,\__, ,,, . . . . ...._...., _�i � w� ; %\ I I -- gg -,.� 11�;51`1� '�11� ':�:� , .� , .., - , ­�_, ^ � . , lli�'>,`.10�'1'3�� Y;K ....................... ,­ " ; . �' �411:1-""��"'71"-,�,i��.,�-�- �-,'.-�-. ""' ly"", `�' -_ """", . � . . . .. 1_1,1� �Z.I�X4� �-�` ��N� , ;A"AW11771"', IL J\ I " � . ;1­1� &I - . ,�,� ...� ��-�;;:��3 ", ,Mw�.�Z��,�.Z�:�o', . " 'R;: I jW_ N, 1:�.� j%�.%�, , ,,,, >� *�,: t �: ,,, L " - �f'�., � � I . \ , . , , " -C � M ,,, - '-',`� , "N .- I -"* ?.`�,,�-.-3,�,..�.,..-�-� , . -.1- ., . ' - I ,,\ % \�l I I oQR,�,,,.*� , 0 I I - . ., �_! 121�,,;��_.-,�'��..�' 'fiz_l - �- 11'.., .�i�� , .� . .1% i I . I , .,.',".','.'�',�.'4.".,."."- .1'..'i'll, : ... �`­M.V:.."� *�'��,:,;�%­- I \ 1% I ��'ll""�l""II'll"�,�,,��,L,L��'ll""Il""���. M,111'N� . �.�, "T.k I - , , �,, W x � _r _� . . "A 010 . .., \\\ \ .... . :.,�g�l � I � f , I �, ,� ,�L ...... - ,,,,:,!. W .. . *L-1�11�1�0 . - ,.�i, L "­ -, � . cq�� � - - I.- "' � , , . : , , , ', ��'­­' X\ A .,.,., .­.�� ., �"�-11�1- x, :-� ,�11 ..'I�t'11�1., " � ,�X�� ,� ,.,-A-i L:. .� i��,.-'* `�N--.,- .� __', , 4 : �*,`��N, , . ­ . - I � � ., . : . I 'A'� I �-�; �':,. I., `:::jjjj:: :��'R,' :11 � ,��,., I - , , I. , '� "N'. , .-.., � ,�, - " -..-,, .1 ,'� `> � ;I . -- Iff , _ '�\ % % , �,�.� -.,g�101 R �.e����..-�,�.'...-.���.,�",��,.�, N'i,".� , `,ffl ,,��-�N=,� , " , . , -I , � "'. �,_11� . ": > k ,1011`� �-:.` � . " , ..i� " , ,:III �� \ - 0", g" ,,�, ", " � . � �.'111.`�; ,,��,'�. � 10�.11.1-1-1 ,:",: ... . , , _� , . �,�, 'm g - ,,� , ', - ­. I �,M L z��,,'<.,,���.'��-""r-"�,.",.,."....",.�.. . `�� i ...... � �� . � . 11x�:,;'�',,'Xx,7._ .." . I . --� , " % IF , m \ , %I -. L ""I" .. ,� - � , .-§ '. , " .- - I., ��­."� 1_'__�, I I , - , , . �;!��:�,.,� �;�: -1-L,,'-1 % I \% I f I 1��`­ L.�-,. 211,." 1�� � 1`�.Nk �_ N .", .. I., , � ` -�- � L, - -, - . . "" " , , - """" /:,:, .-�I�� , . % �� % .., " 1� `i�,'�,�,:-��*�`%,?",;. - ,g . � �-�.,;-�- �, .�,.­­ ....... ­­ ...... ,X- 1� " , " , , - 46 I , , ,� " ". :_ "i" � ,�� � �� . . I ..A .. .. , -, ". , , "' � - � '.�`....�..:L. 0.- - � ". . - , . - �- m� �' � I . f , , , - ..'... _:' - % �\ I � , �:!'. _�- -,.::��` .11111.-.-,� ... 1� .., , 0�. .,� 5�.5111'1.1�11111' '��%�..'�': , � . 1� ". � %N V I - �\ " , - - , , , " � , "X,�ft':,k-%-�" *�kX,:.,�-_'-�L " :A ' - -� - . .L .. ­. I .. � �?��,'\ - I � X��-- , L � , \ , . , -_­-­RzI . 1." _�, - , '�,,,'� !;1.',-"�.a,�"L___ "11�'�'.s � I . . ,�, -,; � I , . I -n.""i" ins,4,., m � '. � > -, . , ­ "i", , - '. , . �� `* �­ " "'XI- 1`�_ 11 1-1, �'-�'11-' . , `� I"' , �' , -.�,::����i,.->,�'-.-'..'.'�������"f�, . �� . . , . .. - ^ I I %, . - - - �_i____-.� L ,�,.� . L __� .1 ,_K_W,� 1,k.�_"_ n.", � - � .,:�;k - , ,� � . ;xi '... .>��,, , ­,­�` , ,;.-gm --, - - �, � �-- �, " .10 4 "g,*-,�,,�,-.,r', -��` "' I -,." "", - -, " �� ? 1`1`B_1�.1�_'-_-__ .. � _".�;�", -.1 I , , ., . 21.,-.,�i� .----� .1., .�� ,,.,-��' g,.-tg.,�.gpz :� ,,.1! 1� _.�,` , �,� -1-_-1 _111RR " X, ww "M .,N..�, � � "-�\-11 ;� .z � , , , , 11, 'I - I - , i - , , , , ,� , � .�`--�f 81'. ��, --��:��` 0 1-15511� "I , -----��,--�-".-.�,'-..� , , I ,� I � . '... , .. �>�',';-. , :` - I . L �� I , �_., I - � , .. � - , I - - _,".1 .� 1.1, I. " �� ?" , �� � I --- �.:. .� �" " - .1 ��, 1\� .7"E!,il'._� " � '. .7,11'.- '� ."-_,�`��`Ilrl , , -, - - �: .", x�. �--.-, ---,;.� < . I.—, "I .� ­&K�.kL.,N,_,;,1�.L­1 ­, L -.. 111­1,� - ;;�,,�:��,'kg, �;- IN'N �NUX_IXIX4�W,;,�;� _ , . , ,;a', , , ,`� . 4� � ;L, , ,�, "'g- I , 5N �� ,i� , :i��'. `�� ,!; - \. 11 � -�._�,' �'A . , .�_,,' I , . , , . _ .�, I .1 � _ .,. - _', � ., x ,X.t� _� , .. � _� , " . L � � , -1 . .g ..� � � � g'.., �L_ , . ., . . ��. 2. . ,$ � , ,� . - � .� , . -11.1 _ I., I., � "I � ".?"�- -�,;-::��:;x� , "Ir . % � L'. . . . . �,�Lr ,\ 0 ,; , __� � N11. - ,� ;1-r'. - mm � _..'.,\ 0 .,.:" 111, .3; 'i` /`,­;& ,'�".R�;",'.,�'. " L�: . I . . '' , "" "' , .L, � � 'I " ­ , " . * � _� , �,.* �'P.:�.:,,%�,N - _;:el . � � .11.11-N-11.11- ,1- "� , X.I. W , - ': , -,� , . ". . . . . .., , .." �., " , �; � , - " ,­R1,,,,�-,,-,,, .� , i A . . � , ,., -, -, � -� ` - � , , , � ". . ,� , .. . . 1- " , - ?.-...-.,-,�,,�--.�.-�...���,,�,,�,.:.'-�,�.,, , , / " ,x � . I % . .� .�'. � I . _?"�� RRX�_, , k , �!.N 0, , w . , , . . , 1, ,< , I I% , - , . L, _,,� 1 .�, . ., , g", -��. - - - ­� - --� -mg - , g I , -� " � . ..� I L I , - ,> -�, " , , , � , % /, ­'. ­�l --,z',­g-,, �g, ��:,,�r,�� , 4 � . �� ., M-_.�` _ \ . . � g -, . L 'm , . � e6 . . , " . - I . ,\ , , , - m - m I .. -. - -. � .. -, f � �`�, " 1 1'k.`,�, � �,R,,�,�`�-."' , " - - .. - k % .� g -� - - -�,­- , L. --� .,L" -�.-.� -�,­. N - �,� I �, I ,� .. .. , I .1'...'R. -', ..\\,.,- - N, , �, -, V I ,��R-,`� . - I ., � N, - ".�. I . - - I , ;� A �R'.` "P. � 11-,'-�R,. ... . 1. . L, I �' - " $, � .. I . __' . .,.. k�� I _�-, I , x � , \ , ".. �_ . __ �-, _��- .. . . ,, �.-x.%.w , - . '. .". ,­,­..'_1­�-�"....'. . . -;-;�,-�`.-.�,�:,Nl' 1 7 CONCRETIV � �� - .� d . k\ N \ , m . .1 ". � �; ...-t'. :,-',-�:;�� . I \ kj I - I i . . 11 r I ... � U . 1. t- I % \N % � 5 '� N'>W�1'1_i � . , . ,Inl� -..", I PLAZA % " `,L:-.:, .:1",..�".>­",- ..... . . " I , "I '�` - .1 . - 4 f", x I 1% N � . ... -,� .,. -� -� -�� �? .." ..,. 1�'4111 k ; ;.,% I . � .;: - . . -- r. r- .. .,. � _, ­ - - ��'.',x.. - ��::.��,:m.:�,: ,�'.�.��S5"�'.,��,...,,,..,,..,,.---.�,�.:,..���-"".,--.-..,, I--,' 1, 11 . k I % %\ I , I I � i .11 I.." I - ,,, � . . . � ­-'­�,;"".. . .�__��o 4 . .A t� % x , -�� -; -� A:�:!!�*'i: ..A . . I A\ IL V� , -g,,*,., ,� - , ­g��'-�@�,--,n 'n", ­x --;�- ­�`\ " .F� g L"�mg ,­-*--,-.�;.-� .. - V r \ '�`� , I'll", ... L . ,�� � ',�.� I � . ." I � ..... ... - I , � \k % \1 1� �100��""1'1111 . 1* : � .... . . I N ., '�t��..-�ll.�*���.�>711!1414%i4v- 7 ., . \� \ : Z, I % 'j - -. A %% % ,,.g.,,,�p, 4 \ I j A 1 . % %% - % ", , ", .s, . . % 4 %% L, " .,,,.�'­ , 15 SIDEWALK 0 \ 1 16 it 1 . __ 1� 1 4m; i . � , , . I \ � � %I . , - \ �% k . . 40 . . I . . % � - , . \ k %% � � V A . , \ . 5 , 1% % C) . . � . . 1� % %% % . I . . , . A \ I % , % 1 5� . . . . . V - �\ % . . .4 .. . . A, , 8 LANDSCAPE \ P ,- �_ I -V% ,,\N \ ) 'i ,� % A t - , z . . . , . 3�0 . . . - . \ xv . % .4 , 'A' \ � \ I 11 . � VL k . �% . � 4 . . .0 9e I % 4 . . 4, . I \1 \ � - xk\� 4, % �A x 4. * - . I � or' !;,� . '-' T VIC IBARRA (POTELCO/PSE I .y!, \N \ ? � I . ;4 14 , \ ) % \ A \\ k , . IL 1�1 % 4 - J\ I I �,OA&�' , � 0 253-606-5084. 10 .DAYS IN ADVANCE OF WORK TO- % x %% % '01 ! 4 %\ I '�._10 � . ,.A b SCHEDULE POWER DISCONNECT IN EXISTING BUILDING ix %�, . :..g" � .\ \ I'L I � 1� 1� . % I AND FIELD MEETING FOR DIRECTION ON LOOPING NEW . �,eI\ \%,x, LANDSCARE- - 11: I . I �& kk �, b\ I. %J%'k _ 1� ;,_11� ;, , � � . � 'y - ,,�.�, *,�<D �, '0�. * CONDUITS IN HANDHOLE. - el." % 1%��) "" " ,,- 1_� � A A , "" . I " � 1. , . .� � . � ,"rw"Irl, 'r, �,;�5.'_:�� k" . A �� q1- A \\\ , , ,_ " � 1, � I �, . A � " I .. . . % J\ % I 011--l' * I At % * I 1_­� I - 11 I . '4 .\ 0 4 \JA , ;,, ­- -,, , 1--l", . V, % � . %% � ��_ � I . : , , ,--.-' � ': �% I% \ % � %It . , oxvioNt � I IL k% V %. . ?L,\ 11__� \1 A � 11 I � . � 01 - 15 90k) 1* 1�\\ %% % % 1. . � 0 -I--"- % % %\ N i 4 , I % k� % V k vvdl .1 --lo \ kA % k N x kk % 4AI �_ I 1___�' � .1 �% I .. I % I �, . " �1_ I I I % \ X� N ?1� k ,* ; .- � . . � . . N IN I 1 �4 A % .a . � 1% N A- . N - . .. 1% %., \ X , . . (A . % � . % I 11�. % LEGEND PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT SAWCUT EXISTING CONCRE . TE CURB NEW CONCRETE CURB NEW CONC. SWALE �, , ...�.,. Un -1,111.1,11-- I" -,N�.'11' , , , , , .0, " - I - - , -k� ... �,. ; ., " , , n . - . I - I I "'P, I . I '. I. .�l ", ,� , , .. , . - , , , ,� � , . .�� � , �_ '1'1�. . ­ � , L'' `,;,�, I -1 . , : . '0 .� . . . . .. I . L . . � =' . L - I ----m- - - - ----r--"- - . - - � I 11 � � 0 F-V'M'ILM,� ��.. I . .04m .4> 0 . * 0 1 1 " �� I— W1. * ` , : '� �g 10 :�: . 1, , 4*,4 - - . � . % 41 , � - 16� 4�-/&e E NG ,�' . KENT, WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX . CIVIL ENOWERIK, LMD PLANNNG, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ...... _________ a: all Ra" to ,,,.� t 'tomme F fnw,o INWI-4 � I/ %0/ -r -,.-WI'%W%#I1 1W FVWft;1N I WIN 1 W116,1%. %J66. W6IF-WI60 40414mlftl #-W� I . . 0 STORAGE TANK VENT STACK PER TANK DRAWINGS. REFER TO D . ETAIL 6/C7 FOR VENT SLAB S AND BOLLARD DETAIL. � '� -i r 0 CONCRETE GUTTER SWALE PER DETAdL(S) 7 AND 10/C7. . 111% .�j * S /f/ . (D BOLLARD PER DETAIL 4, SHEET A3. . . . -.90 ... � � PROVIDE (2) 3/4" CAPPED CONDUITS FROM KIOSK TO VENT RISER SUPPORT STRUCTURE (FOR I , & ,p 28527 ,�4 0-- 0 V e, . I RECOVERY MODIFICATIONS) 5ell 01m Aq . #41. /08 . %a & 0 e TYPE 2A SIDEWALK RAMP PER CITY OF RENTON STID DETAIL FO 1 1 AL - ,q 5 ......... I "I rn tn In rn CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF RENTON DETAIL F005 I%r 1%r V_ w- r- %_ Ir- e T_ It- 0 -0 0 0 0 . , o 0 uj. C4 04 N 04 Of Ncm I,-- 6 a a CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF RENT014 DETAIL F001 a 8 C'4 rQ g rn, '**N �� *_ a . 0 0 Vft 04 A, n C4 %,. ;;., 0 0 0 0 8 -45 COKRETE.,,PWA PER­D`ET.AIL,11 DSCAPE PLANS FOR FINISH AMD JOINT LOCATIONS. -T . .- f-"---"1?-"";�L;�,-".��'-'�",;'�' ­_ .�,,�*�-"-,,,-J:�.1-,�,-�.�-�,r:--.-�'�--��..'r.�.'-'-,"",�, ­��,,�,­_T­",."r�-�' -` - � , _. 1 ­ I, �,,�.2'el",,�.,�",',�,,�,.,..-C.'.�;-�:,, ;,��, 'L� `z . , ; I � � . � 11 . . _1 . - .. I .. . . i . . . � u' _j 8 INSTALL 3'" CONDUIT WITH (4)' #4/0 THHM/THWN CU AND 1#2 GROUND TO KIOSK FOR POWER 0 e SENCE. COORDINATE WITH PSE ON CONNECTION AT EXISTING HANDHOLE. 1z a 0 0 a LL � : i * > PROVIDE .(2) 3/4" CONDUIT FROM KJOSK TO PLANTER FOR NEW SIGN POWER AMD COMMUNICATION. . (D _j -A Q 0 0 a 0 EXACT CONOVIT AND SIGN PLACEMENT SHALL BE FIELD COORDINATED. 0 a . - 0 FILTERRA WATER QUALITY UNIT. SEE SHEET C5 FOR PLAN AND C9 FOR DETAILS. . 0 MONU , MENT SIGN (SEPARATE PERMIT).. . U� : . SAWCUT PAVEMENT IN SMOOTH, CONTINUOUS LINE FOR NEW WORK. COORDINATE LIMITS WITH z 0 DEMOLITION AND IRRIGATION PLANS. CLEAN AND TACK COAT PAVEMENT EDGES PRIOR TO MATCHING 0 . NEW PAVEMENT TO EXISTING. V) . PROVIDE (2) 3/4" CONDUIT FROM KIGSK TO EXISTfNG SIGN FOR POWER AND COMMUNICATION. I 0 1 > I I 0 THERMOPLASTIC/PAJNTED CROSSWALK PER CITY OF RENTON STD DETAIL H012 MATCH EXISTING LLJ I , CROSSWALK MATERIAL, rl� 1-L: - . W $_ 0 (2)-2" CONDUITS W/ PULL WIRE, FROM KtOSK TO STORE (COMPUTER ROOM), FOR COMMUNICATION I X SERVICE. COORDINATE WITH KROGER PM FOR EXACT LOCATION OF ENTRY POINT AT STORE. SEE W �_ DETAIL 3/C8 FOR BUILDING PENETRATION DETAIL AND SHEET E-1.0 FOR CONDUIT SCHEDULE. . �_ 0 INSTALLATION OF CONDUITS SHALL K ACCOMPLISHED BY BORING (SEE SCHEDULE NOTE 6, SHEET . =_ :5 E-1.0) UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY KROGER PM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE BID ALTERNATE FOR _j C) . OPEN CUT/TRENCHING ALONG ALIGNMENT AS SHOWN ON SHEET C1. FIELD LOCATE EXISTING UTILITIES _j < PRIOR TO TRENCHING TO AVOID CONFLICT, 9 .. -.,-j < r_ I... � W I- 2 . 2 .-a 1.6- m 2 m . PAINTED TRAFFIC ARROW PER DETAIL 1 1 /C7. m 2 m W M :) v - L n S an V) 0 0 . V) _j z =� LILJ z 2 11 W W 0 0 m 8 La Ir Ce CZ P 0 X PAINTED TRAFFIC ISLAND, USING 4" WIDE YELLOW STRIPES AT 45� ANGLE/ 3' O.C. �_ La �__ T_ o � �- 0 t= � x Q - .. . m 2 2 2 0 . I M. m cr 'a METER, 'MAIN DISCONNECT, AND MANUAL TRANSFER SWITCH. cc I W 6i u . # W � CL ca m a. V) 0 . t Cz . 0 . A . I ­ . A 0 BOILLARD LIGHT. PROVIDE 3/4'm CONDUIT FROM KIOSK TO BOLLARDS FOR WIRING. REFER TO SHEET 2 LLARD AND WIRING SPECIFICATIONS. . r1% W a I C14 to It in < z %_ . . 7 12" WIDE WHITE PAINTED STOP BAR WITH 15" LONGo 4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LANE STRIPE. I iiiiiiiiiiiii��ill I I — I I . 0) 0 0 -4- . . , . : . . m I i . � .. . .. I *:;401410m L01, 1;, NOTE: ALL SIGNS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. <D NEW LOGO AND "FRED MEYER" TEXT. 0 SEE SHEET A2.0 FOR DETAILS. 0 NEW ILLUMINATED LOGO SYMBOL. SEE RDC SHEET A2.0 FOR DETAILS. NEW KIOSK LOGO SIGN. SEE SHEET A2.0 (D FOR DETAILS. I (D . NEW PRICE SIGN. I SEE SHEET A2.0 ': FOR DETAILS. i � . CITY OF RENTON Approved by: . Date: Approved by: Approved by: Approved by: I Date: Wte: . Date: Project #: 13245 Store #00459 ,,- 0 Designed By: CMT CN , 114 Drawn By: RDC '_ �1� Checked By: JH .. . CD E - Date: 9.7.2012 � `- 'o- * --o Scole: III- 1 - 20' 0 .'o Disk File: 13245-03-A . '�" 3: 10 Model: A W . - LL.