The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMiscHampton Inn & Suites -Renton 1300 Lake Washingt on Blvd North Land Use Application -Supplemental Package 22 December 2014 ,,, :••~11~-~~ DESIGN GROUP PLLC Project Description The property is located in the City of Renton , on the east side of Lake Washington Blvd North , just north of Houser Way North. The project site totals 1.3 acres in area, is zoned Urban Center - North 2 (UC-N2) and is subject to additional Urban Design District "C " review. It is currently occupied by an espresso stand, which will be demolished. The proposed project will be 5 stories in height with 105 guest rooms. A total of 105 parking stalls that w ill be provided in a two- level , below-grade parking garage. The site is subject to C ity of Renton site plan review, including zoning review, SEPA, and Design Review. Site Area Proposed Building Areas (GSF) Reside ntial (4 levels) Lobby and Hospitality Be low Grade Parkin g (2 levels), Level 1 Parking , mech/service space Total Building Area Room Mix King (364 SF avg) King Sofa (409 SF avg) Double Queen (353 SF avg) King Suite (475 SF avg) ADA Double Queen (506 avg) ADA King Suite (587 avg) Total Parking (modification request) Residential 1 per Room Required Staff 1 per 3 Staff Total Required Parking (Provided) *9 % Parking reduction Hampton Inn & Suites -Renton 1300 Lake Wa shington Blvd North 57,002 SF 59,642 SF 7,287 SF 37,362 SF 4,519 SF 108,810 SF 24 12 36 29 3 1 105 105 10 115 105* =••!111~-~~ 22 December 2014 DESIGN GROUP PL L C Zoning Analysis Lot Coverage RMC 4-2-120E Height Limit RMC 4-2-120E Setbacks RMC 4-2-120E Parking /Loading RMC 4-2-120E RMC 4-3-100 90% of total area or 100% if parking is provided within the building or within a parking garage 6 stories along residential/minor collectors (Collector: Lake Washington Blvd N from N Park Dr to FA l-405) Min imum Front Yard: 0 ft Maximum Front Yard: 5 ft A ll park i ng sha ll be structured parking except parking required for guests. UC-N2 Modulation a. Requirements Incorporate building modulation to reduce the overa ll bulk and mass of buildings Provide building articu lation and textural variety. RMC 4-2-120E d . Hampton Inn & Suites -Renton 1300 Lake Wa shi ngt on Blvd North n Blvd N Zones Urban Center -D Residential North 1 4 du/ac D Urban Center- North 2 D Residential 8 du/ac D Industrial -Medium D Residential 10 du /ac D Residential 1 du/ac D Residential Multi-Family 22 Decemb er 2014 Uses D Townhouse D Live-Work Lofts • Multifamily ~No. of Stories • Industrial --City of Renton border • Commercial =••:.11~-~~ DESIGN GROUP P LL C Context and Traffic Analysis Hampton Inn & Suites -Renton 13 00 Lake Wa shi ngton Bl vd North Traffic Key -Interstate Freeways ~ -Pr incipal Arterial -Major Truck ~ -Minor Arterial -Collector Arteria l ••• i:::=::::J Resident ial Access <><><><> Bike Lane #1 2100 Lake Was hington Bl v d N Large tow nhouse development, sli ght setback from road #2 19 00 La ke Was hing t o n Bl vd N Large apartment complex, continuous natural screening 22 Dece mbe r 20 14 Bus Stop Stop Light Bus Route #3 175 0 Lake Was hington Bl vd N Loft units, vie ws of Lake Washington #4 1700 Lake Was hingto n Bl vd N Apartment complex, setback from road, views of Lake Washington #5 13 22 Lake Was hing t o n Bl vd N Live -wo rk units, open plaza space =••~11~-~~ DESIGN GROUP PLLC Context and Traffic Analysis Hampton Inn & Suites -Renton 1300 Lake Wa shington Bl vd No rth Traffic Key c:::J Int erst ate F reeways w Bus Stop r::::J Principa l A rt eria l -Major Tru ck ~ Stop Light c::::J Mi nor Arteria l -Co ll ect o r A rt e ri a l ••• Bus Route i===i Res ident ia l Access <xX><> B ike Lane #6 Vi ew Fr o m 1322 Lak e Wa sh ing t o n Bl vd N Adjace nt park, large amounts of vegetation blocking view of lake #7 1300 Lake Was hin gton Bl vd N (Site) Existi ng coffee stand to be demolished 22 Decemb er 2014 ·-_________ __::----:::-~=::::::.. .lk. I #8 1280 La k e Was hing t o n Bl vd N Existing parking lot south of site #9 Vi ew Fr om 128 0 Lake Wa shingto n Bl vd N Existing rail l ines/crossing j ust south and across th e street from site # 1 0 1200 N 10th Pl Large apartment complex, open space/material/sca le examples =••!111~11~~ DESIGN GROUP PL L C Site Analysis =-· ~ Hampton Inn & Suites -Renton 1300 Lake Washing to n Blvd North 0 d 0::: =::! <{ 0::: u ii: u ~ :z: 0::: w .::c l-o::: 0 :z: VACAN T PARKING LOT ~ /\ 22 December 20 14 l 2 .5 MILES SEAHAWKS T RAINING FAC ILI TIES -I ~ <J' ~ :lllllllr!1I~-~~ DES I GN GROUP PL L C Urban Design Regulations (UC-N2) Site Design and Building Location City of Renton Design Intent • To ensure v isibility of businesses and to estab li sh active, li vely uses along sidewalks and pedestrian pathways. To organize buildings for pedestrian use and so that natural li ght is available to other structures and open space. To ensure an appropriate transition between bu il dings, parking areas and other land uses , and increase privacy for residential uses. Project Goals • • Site Design & Building Location Building holds strong urban edge along Lake Wash in gton Blvd N , while providing setback for pedestrian activities. Site access provided at south end of s ite to minim ize conflict with curb cut to northern property. Entry • Primary entry faces Lake Washington B lvd N at entry plaza. • Building overhangs drive ais le to integ ra te weather protection at entry and loading zone with bu ilding fo rm. Wood soffit and downlights to provide warmth and te xture. LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N -ELEVATION AND TRANSITION TO SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS Hampton Inn & Suites -Renton 1300 Lake Washington Blvd North 22 December 2014 Project Goals Transition t o Surrounding Development Bui lding steps ba ck along no rt h property l ine to t ra nsition bui ld ing with Live/Work de velopment to north (see sec t ion 'A') Lake Wash in gton Blvd N has 4 sto ry bui lding a lo ng street frontage w ith 5t h story portion stepped back to reduce perceived mass. (see sect ion 'B') =••!11~-~~ DESIGN GROUP PLLC 1 1 SECTION 'A' -SETBACKS ALONG NORTHERN PROPERTY ,;; ', i 1',~ (;' I !$>' t SECTION 'B' -SETBACKS ALONG LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N Hampton Inn & Suites -Renton 1300 Lake Washington Blvd North t :IIIIIJ!1l~a~~ 22 December 2014 DES I GN GROUP PLLC Urban Design Regulations (UC-N2) Parking and Vehicular Access 4-3-100 City of Renton Design Intent Vehicular Access • To maintain contiguous and uninterrupted sidewalk by minimizing , consolidating and/or eliminating vehicular access off street. Structured Parking • To promote more efficient use of land needed for vehicle parking; To physically integrate parking garages with other uses ; To reduce the overall impa ct of parking garages Service Elements Location and Design • To reduce the potential negative impacts of service elements by locating services and loading areas away from pedestrian areas. Project Goals Vehicular Access • Site access provided at south end of site to minimize conflict with curb cut to northern property. Structured Parking • Two levels of below ground parking provided . Entry to parking garage located at rear of building beyond loadin g. Service Elements • Service elements (trash/recycling) located in building , next to parking garage entry, to reduce impact on pedestrians. Hampton Inn & Suites -Renton 1300 Lak e Washington Blvd North =••~11~-~~ 22 Decembe r 2014 DESIGN GROUP PLLC Urban Design Regulations (UC-N2) Pedestrian Environment & Recreation Areas and Common Open Space City of Renton Design Intent Pedestrian Circulation • To create a system of pathways that are clearly del ineated and connect buildings, open spaces and park ing areas w it h sidewalks and abutting properties . Pe destrian Amenities • To create attractive spaces that unify the building and street environments and are inviting and comfortable for pedestrians. . To provide publicly accessible areas that function for a variety of year round activities , under typica l seasona l wea t her conditions . Recreation and Common Open Space • To ensure areas for both pass ive and active recreation are avai lable for workers and vis itors in loca t io ns. • To create usable and inviting open space that is accessib le to the public , and promote pedestrian activity on streets . Project Goals • Outdoor terrace adjacent to poo l area has afternoon s unlight and provides guests with views toward Lake Washington . • Pedestrian plaza along Lake Washington B lvd N with weather protection and lighting. Entry plaza for pedestrians and ve hicular loading connects exterior spaces w ith main e ntry. Landscaping e lements w i ll create visua l i nterest at entry. Hampton Inn & Suites -Renton 1300 Lake Wa shington Blvd North 22 Decembe r 2014 .ENTRY WITH PEDESTRIAN [CONNECTION 0 SIDEWALK =--~~~-~~ DES I GN GROUP PLLC AERIAL LOOKING NORTHWEST -VIEWS OF LAKE WASHINGTON FROM ROOF DECK ENTRY & PEDESTRIAN PLAZAALONG LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N Hampton Inn & Suites -Renton 1300 Lake Washington Blvd North VIEW TO LAKE WA SHINGTON 22 December 2014 :••~111~-~~ DESIGN GROUP PLLC Urban Design Regulations (UC-N2) Building Architectural Design City of Renton Design Intent District C 1. 2 . All Districts 1. 2. All building facades shall include measures to reduce the apparent scale of the building and add visual interest. Buildings shall be articulated with c . roof line features Human scale elements such as lighting fixtures, trel li s, or other landscape features shal l be provided along the facade's ground floor Any facade visible to the public shall be comprised of at least 50% transparent windows and/or doors for at least the portion of the ground floor facade between 4 '-8' above the ground. 3. Upper portions of the building facades shall have clear windows with visibility into and out of t he building . The minimum amount of light transmittance for windows shall be 50%. Hampton Inn & Suites -Renton 1300 Lake Wa shington Blvd North TERRACE WITH WOOD SOFFIT & RECESSED LIGHTING 22 December 20 14 ---SHED ROOF WITH WOOD SOFFIT & RECESSED LIGHTING PAINTED HORIZONTAL LAP SIDING ~ STONE ALONG LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N AND GROUND FLOOR OF COURTYARD ~ WOOD SOFFIT & RECESSED LIGHTING .___ ______________ .AT ENTRY & DRIVE SUNSHADES ABOVE WINDOWS AISLE =••~11~-~~ DESIGN GROUP PLLC Urban Design Regulations (UC-N2) Building Architectural Design City of Renton Design Intent Building Character and Massing To ensure that buildings are not bland and so that they appear to be at a human scale, as well as to ensure that all sides of the building which can be seen by the public are visually interesting. Project Goals Massing along Lake Washington Blvd N is accentuated in 3 masses that wrap around the building . The stone along the street frontage has been wrapped into the courtyard as a base to reduce the scale of the building. City of Renton Design Intent Building Roof Lines • To ensure that roof forms provide distinctive profiles and interest consistent with an urban project and contribute to the visual continuity of the district. Project Goals • • ~ Shed roof provided at fifth story setback that opens up to the views of Lake Washington. Wood soffits provided at the soffit of the shed roof, as well as the soffit at the entry plaza and the second floor terrace to provide warmer texture at human sca le. ~~~~:1 -. --· ~..-.-ii' .,._ -I .•. ·'."";\;· ... • ... , .. I : ~;'*'~ 1~ ·~ ~--·, ' .,,4;~ .. -.· ,,• ~ ... ~ ~·~ . ' ; : ;11,.~ .. ljtl~I ,.1 1;« ·""' •: ~ :: -~:~ ~ - City of Renton Design Intent Building Materials • To ensure high standards of quality and effective maintenance over time and encourage the use of materials that reduce the visual bulk of large buildings , as well as encourage the use of materia ls that add visual interest to the neighborhood. Project Goals • Stone used along Street Frontage and ground floor of courtyard for durability and textura l variety. • Variety of building materials to provide variety of te xtures in the Northwest aesthetic: Stone , Hardie panel Siding and Stucco. The following inspirational images illustrate the use of Northwest materials (stone, fiber cement panels, metal panels & wood), natural tones and wood soffits with integrated lighting. Hampton Inn & Suites -Renton 1300 Lake Wash ing t on Bl vd No rth 22 Decembe r 2014 :lll.!111~11~~ DESIGN GROUP PLLC Urban Design Regulations (UC-N2) Signage -Special Requirements (RMC 4-4-100 G) City of Renton Design Intent • Means of identify i ng & advertis i ng businesses Directional assistance Encou rage signs that are both clear and of appropriate sca le for project , contributes to the character of the Urban center and Center Village , and create color and interest. Project Goals • The la rge r corporate logos face north and south , facing vehicular traffic on Lake Washington Blvd N . A blade sign above the entry provides direction and visib ility for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. • Monument s ignage i ncorporated into the landscaping a long Lake Washington B lvd N. BLADE SIGN Urban Design Regulations (UC-N2) Lighting City of Renton Des ign Intent E nsure safety and security Provide adequate lighting levels in pedestrian areas , such as plazas , pedestrian walkways , parking areas, building entries, and other public spaces. Increase the visual attractiveness of th e area at all time s of the day and night. Project Goals • Wall mounted fi xtures provided at the stone columns along Lake Washington Blvd N will provide downlight ing at the pedestrian plaza. Recessed downlights integrated into the wood soffit at the entry plaza , drive aisle and loading area. • Recessed downlights integrated into the wood soffit at the second floor terrace and green roof. • Landscape lighting and downlighting provided at courtyard and plazas. RECESSED DOWN LIGHTS WALL MOUNTED FIXTURES :111•~11~-~~ Hampton Inn & Suites -Renton 1300 Lake Wa sh ington Blvd North 22 Dec embe r 2014 DESIGN GROUP PLLC Critical Areas Building located to minimize impact to s e nsitive and protective slopes . (See revised Geote chnical Report prepared by ESNW, dated 18 Decembe r 2014 .) COR Maps with Sensitive Areas and Regulated slopes (City of Renton ) D > 15% & <= 25% >25% & <= 40% (S en s itiv e ) >40% & <90 % (Prote cted) <90% (Protected) Hampton Inn & Suites -Renton 1300 La ke Washing t on Blvd No rth D 22 December 2014 20-33% (AREA OF SE NSITIVE AN D/OR PROTECTED S LOP E) % of l mg_acted Are a 33-100% 29% (+/-1 ,5 9 5 SF ) 16% (+/-4 ,185 SF) 0 % (0 S F ) 1 00% % o f U n imQ a c ted Area 71 % (+/-3,853 S F ) 84 % (+/-21,266 S F ) 100% (+/-2 ,800 S F ) ' =• IIJ.!.111 ~-~~ DES I GN GROUP PLLC 0 EXHIBITS Project Name: Project Number: Renton Hampton Inn & Suites LUA14-000061, SA-M, SA-H, ECF, MOD, MOD, VA- A, VA-H Date of Hearing 4/7/2015 Staff Contact Roca le Timmons Project Contact/Applicant Project Location Faizel Kassam 1300 Lake Washington Blvd N The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit 1: Exhibit 2: Exhibit 3: Exhibit 4: Exhibit 5: Exhibit 6: Exhibit 7: Exhibit 8: Exhibit 9: Exhibit 10: Exhibit 11: Exhibit 12: Exhibit 13: Exhibit 14: Exhibit 15: Exhibit 16: Exhibit 17: Exhibit 18: Exhibit 19: Exhibit 20: Exhibit 21: Exhibit 22: ERC Report Site Plan Landscape Plan Renderings/ Design Package Tree Removal Plan Drainage Report (May 1, 2015) Geotechnical Report (December 18, 2014) Traffic Impact Analysis (dated June 4, 2014) Independent Peer Review -Transportation (August 5, 2014) Public Comment Letter: Christ Applicant Response to Christ Comment Letter Transportation Concurrency Memo SEPA Determination and Mitigation Measures (dated March 16, 2015) Parking Analysis (dated November, 2014) Elevations Request for Exception (dated January 16, 2014) Floorplans Hearing Examiner Staff Recommendation (dated April 7, 2015) Staff Powerpoint Presentation to HEX (April 7, 2015) Revised Parking Plan (April 7, 2015) Revised Drainage Plan (April 7, 2015) Traffic Response to SEPA Mitigation Measures (dated April 7, 2015) Cityof 1 ·~11·wll Hampton I nn & Suites (LUA14-000061) HEX Public Hearing Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner April 7, 2015 ~rT: C it y of , ~ 1;eJJIDJJ(~ ( 01m11umly a nd l ;.vnon n ,: l)e,·~,mn1t ® . . ' Project Description ® . . ' Presentation Overview • Project Description • Renton Municipal Code Analysis -Co m pliance -Cond i t io ns • Staff Recommendation -------Rt-N l Ol\ Site Characteristics Or St EXHIBIT_1.-1..------ LUA ________ _ DATE: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION 4 /7/2015 1 ---....._ RENTON Design Description Staff Analysis ~ ~ ,Mt Recommendation Sta ff recomme nds approval of the Renton Ha mpt on Inn & Suites, as depicted in Exhibit 2 subject to 20 conditions of approval. 4/7/2 01 5 Renton Municipal Code Analysis • Site (Mast er) Plan Rev iew • Des ign Rev ie w • Cr iti cal Area Va riance • FY Setba ck Variance • Parking Modificat ion • St reet Modificat ion ---....._ R~N(()N ,. -.,-----.... ' .. : . ~ ~, '. y;~ 1111111 ---....___ REt-:TON I.Zon1n1 Sui,.dud1. . ............ . ,....,H-~,q,d,t .,...,., 01D VESTIBULE 13 1 Sf' Staff Analysis --=-i-. ,·· . . . ,· ,;'r J ,' ~ . ' \ \: ~ \_t'1_. . ,, - Zoning Standards BICYCLE PAR KI NG 2 .. I l'- 1.Zonin,: Sunda,M ·•,-....1t••·""4 ·-···-· Zoning Standards r-····=1 , _ _. ___ _ -----------------, / / Pedestrian Scale ® . 0 0 1 z.,....n1 s1 .. rd.1r:k ,tq,:>lh""'' -~·--· ... -.,do """"' 4/7/2015 Zonin,... St~-,dards • e Signage En•ra'1ce Roo p,.-ofile ® . 0 3 • 4/7 /2015 Site Traffic Drainage 4 I. 2. To: From: Subject: Date: Project: ... Gibson Traffic; Consultants, Inc. MEMORANDUM Rocale Timmons. City of Renton Brad Lincoln, PE~- Legacy Renton (Hampton Inn) -Response to ERCR Conditions April 3, 2015 GTC #12-163 Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. (GTC) performed the traffic impact analysis for the Legacy Renton (Hampton Inn) development and this memo addresses comments contained in the City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Report (ERCR), dated March 16, 2015. The ERCR contains four recommended conditions from City of Renton staff to the Hearing Examiner in relation to transportation that are addressed in this memorandum. Each of these conditions is addressed in this memorandum. 1. Update to Horizon Year The ECRC includes a recommendation to change the horizon year from 2015 to 2016 to coincide with the anticipated year of construction. The analysis of the two study intersections has been updated to 2016 based on the parameters utilized in the previous traffic studies for the site. The level of service results with the updated horizon year are summarized in Table 1. Table 1: Level of Service Summary 2013 Existing 2015 Baseline 2016 Baseline 2015 Future 2016 Future w Development w Development Intersection Conditions Conditions Conditions Conditions Conditions LOS Delav LOS Delav LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delav N Lake Washington Blvd at B 12.5 sec F 80.2 sec F 81.3 sec F 84.2 sec F 85.1 sec Coulon Beach/Houser Wav N Lake Washington Blvd at C 19.8 sec C 20.0 sec Site Access ----------------- The revised analysis shows that the level of service and delay are similar to the 2015 results, although there is a minor increase in the delay from the previous results for the year 2015 and the revised year of 2016. The turning movement and level of service calculations are included in the attachments. EXHIBIT_...c.a48-..--- LUA,~-'-~~~-,-,--~ DATE: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION 2802 Wetmore Avenue · Suite 220 • Everett WA, 98201 Tel: 425-339-8266 · Fax: 425-258-2922 • E-mail: info@gibsontraffic.com Legacy Renton ERCR Response 2. Pipeline Development The ERCR includes a recommended condition to the Hearing Examiner from City of Renton staff that a table showing details of the pipeline developments included in the analysis be presented. The three pipeline developments included in the analysis, including the uses. sizes and details regarding the trips added to the study intersection of N Lake Washington Boulevard at Coulon Beach/Houser Way, is shown in Table 2. Table 2: Pipeline Development Summary Impacts to Intersection of Development Land Uses Size Lake Wasbin<»on Blvd at Coulon Beach/Houser Wav Direction/ Inbound/ PM Peak-Hour Movement Outbound Trips Hawk's Hotel 173 rooms Northbound Through Inbound 5 Landing Southbound Through Outbound 5 Apartments 800 units Quendall Retail 21,600 SF Northbound Through Inbound 70 Terminals Office 245,000 SF Southbound Through Outbound 75 Restaurant 9.000 SF Residential 394 units Retail 30,000 SF Northbound Left Inbound 474 Southport Restaurant 10,000 SF Eastbound Right Outbound 923 Hotel 220 rooms Office 720,205 SF It is important to note that the Legacy Renton development add 71 total PM peak-hour trips to the intersection of Lake Washington Boulevard at Coulon Beach/Houser Way, 35 northbound through trips (inbound) and 36 southbound trips ( outbound). Figures from the traffic analysis of the pipeline developments further detailing the impacts of the pipeline developments are included in the attachments. Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. info@gibsontraffic.com 2 March2015 GTC #12-163 Legacy Renton ERCR Response 3. AM Peak-Hour Impacts The ERCR includes a recommended condition that AM peak-hour impacts of the Legacy Renton development be discussed. The analysis that has been submitted to date shows that the Legacy Renton development generates fewer trips during the AM peak-hour ( 66 trips) than compared to the PM peak- hour (75 trips). Additionally. it was identified during the scoping process and during the peer review that AM peak-hour analysis for the development was not required. AM peak-hour level of service analysis has been performed at intersections in the site vicinity for other developments, particularly for the intersection of Lake Washington Boulevard at Garden A venue/Park Avenue as part of the Quendall Terminals report. The analysis shows that the intersection operates with less delay during the AM peak-hour than the PM peak-hour. The combination of the surrounding intersections operating better during the AM peak-hour and the development generating fewer trips during the AM peak-hour identifies that the AM peak-hour is not the critical time period for the intersections in the site vicinity. The analysis for the Legacy Renton development has been performed for the PM peak-hour, which represents the critical time for the intersections in the site vicinity. Level of service results from the Quendall Terminals report are included in the attachments. 4. Proportionate Share The ERCR includes a recommended condition from staff that the Legacy Renton hotel pay a proportionate share for impacts to the intersection of Lake Washington Boulevard at Coulon Beach/Houser Way. The Legacy Renton hotel is anticipated to account for 71 of the 2,640 future trips that are anticipated to be at the intersection. This represents a proportionate share of 2.69% of the future trips. This proportionate share is based on the turning movements calculations that are included in the attachments of this memorandum and were used for the 2016 future with development level of service analysis. It is important to note that the current City of Renton 6-Year Transportation Improvement Plan identifies that the improvements for this intersection are being performed by the Southport development and that the costs of construction are creditable towards mitigation fees. The Legacy Renton development should therefore be given the same credit towards traffic mitigation fees for the proportionate share contribution. Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. info@gibsontraffic.com ' .J March 2015 GTC #12-163 Turning Movement and Level of Service Calculations A 1 Lake Wash Blvd N @ Coulon Synchro ID: Existing Counts I I 362 709 347 Average Weekday 17 307 38 PM Peak Hour C " " Lake Washington Boulevard N " 0 Year: 8/27/2013 177 "' o o C 0 t Data Source: IDAX Cou Ion Beach ~ Houser Way 52 North 12 0 125 8 ¢ 52 105 " Lake Washington Boulevard N " (l 0 9131 160 335 6 I I 412 501 Pipeline Trips I I 5 10 5 Average Weekday o 5 0 PM Peak Hour C 0 " Lake Washington Boulevard N "' 0 o "' 0 o C 0 t Hawk's Landing 0 Coulon Beach DI] Houser Way North 0 0 0 0 ¢ 0 0 " Lake Washington Boulevard N "' (l 0 0 5 0 I I 5 10 5 Pipeline Trips I I 75 145 70 Average Weekday 0 75 0 PM Peak Hour C 0 " Lake Washington Boulevard N "' 0 0 "' 0 0 C 0 t Quendall Terminals 0 Coulon Beach Dill Houser Way 0 North 0 0 0 0 ¢ 0 0 " Lake Washington Boulevard N " (l 0 0 70 0 I I 75 145 70 Pipeline Trips I I 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 0 a PM Peak Hour "' 0 " Lake Washington Boulevard N "' 0 474 ¢, 0 0 "' 0 t Southport Coulon Beach ! 1,397 ! Houser Way 0 North 0 0 923 0 ¢ 0 923 " Lake Washington Boulevard N " (l 0 11.3971 474 0 0 I I 923 474 A-I Future without Development Average Weekday PM Peak Hour Year: 2016 Growth Rate= 1.0% Years of Growth ;:: 3 Total Growth = 1.0303 Development Trips Average Weekday PM Peak Hour Future with Development Average Weekday PM Peak Hour 1 Lake Wash Blvd N @ Coulon _____,I I 18 453 396 !) 39 " 885 432 657 1,708 1,051 0 0 a 12 8 1,031 0 0 "' ¢ " I 0 ¢ 0 " " Lake Washington Boulevard N Coulon Beach ! 2,5691 Houser Way Lake Washington Boulevard N " il 0 I 639 I 420 I 1,427 ! 2,492 1,065 I 36 71 35 0 36 0 " !) " Lake Washington Boulevard N Coulon Beach OD Houser Way Lake Washington Boulevard N " il 0 " '"' " " '"' c? a 35 0 I I 36 35 71 489 956 467 18 432 39 !) " Lake Washington Boulevard N 657 1,708 Coulon Beach Houser Way 12 O 1.051 8 ¢ 1,031 s, Lake Washington Boulevard N " il 0 1 639!455! 1,463 !2,563 _ 1,100 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 53 53 i North i North i North A-2 Synchro ID: Existing Counts Average Weekday PM Peak Hour Year: 8/2712013 Data Source: IDAX Pipeline Trips Average Weekday PM Peak Hour Hawk's Landing Pipeline Trips Average Weekday PM Peak Hour Quendall Terminals Pipeline Trips Average Weekday PM Peak Hour Southport 2 Lake Wash Blvd N @ Site ----~I l1-.,. 0 --.....,..~:,.,~,....,._,0~1-7-09~1 ___ 3_4_7 __ ~ (\ "' N Lake Washington Boulevard 0 0 0 0 0 Site Access 0 0 0 -0 N Lake Washington Boulevard "' il 0 0 347 0 I I 362 709 347 ____ _,j o-j-o~-~-~-o~,__1_0~ ____ s ___ ~ (\ N Lake Washington Boulevard "' 0 0 ¢, 0 "' 0 0 ~ Site Access 0 O 0 0 ¢ 0 " N Lake Washington Boulevard "' fr 0 .----s=----r-1"'0,....._o_~...,~,-~-0---il I I I 0 75 145 70 75 0 0 (\ "' N Lake Washington Boulevard "' 0 0 ¢, 0 O 0 0 Site Access 0 0 0 0 ¢ 0 " N Lake Washington Boulevard "' il 0 0 70 0 I I 75 145 70 ____ __.I ~1-0-~-~-~-o-t--o-~ ___ o ___ ~ (\ N Lake Washington Boulevard ~ 0 0 ¢, 0 0 0 0 Site Access 0 O 0 0 ¢ N Lake Washington Boulevard "' il 0 0 0 I I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t North t North t North t North A -3 2 Lake Wash Blvd N @ Site Future without Development I I 453 886 433 Average Weekday 0 453 0 PM Peak Hour "' 0 "' N Lake Washington Boulevard "' 0 Year: 2016 0 "' 0 0 Growth Rate = 1.0% "' 0 i Years of Growth= 3 0 ~ Site Access 0 North Total Growth= 1.0303 0 0 0 0 ¢ 0 0 s, N Lake Washington Boulevard "' il 0 8861 0 433 0 I I 453 433 Development Trips 2 4 2 Average Weekday 0 0 2 PM Peak Hour "' 0 " N Lake Washington Boulevard "' 2 0 "' 0 38 "' 36 t 0 ~ Site Access 75 North 0 0 0 0 "' 37 0 s, N Lake Washington Boulevard "' il 0 0 0 35 I I 36 71 35 Future with Development I I 455 a90 I 435 Average Weekday 0 453 2 PM Peak Hour a 0 " N Lake Washington Boulevard "' 2 0 "' 0 38 "' 36 t 0 ~ Site Access North 0 0 I 0 0 ¢ 37 0 s, N Lake Washington Boulevard "' il 0 9571 0 433 35 I I 489 468 A-4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: N Lake Washin~ton Boulevard & Coulon Beach/Houser Way_ Renton Hotel / -l' <' -'-...., t I' \. i ./ Lane Grau~ EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1i 'f. 'I\ 'f. 1i 'f. Volume (vph) 12 8 1031 0 0 0 639 420 6 39 396 18 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.851 0.998 0.993 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Said. Flow (prot) 1770 1585 0 0 0 0 1770 1859 0 1770 1850 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.121 0.504 Said. Flow (penm) 1770 1585 0 0 0 0 225 1859 0 939 1850 0 Righ\Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 640 1 2 Link Speed (mph) 25 30 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 189 95 760 215 Travel Time (s) 5.2 2.2 20.7 5.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 13 8 1085 0 0 0 673 442 6 41 417 19 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 13 1093 0 0 0 0 673 448 0 41 436 0 Turn Type Perm NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 49.0 49.0 38.0 71.0 33.0 33.0 Total Split(%) 40.8% 40.8% 31.7% 59.2% 27.5% 27.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s} 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s} 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None Max None None Act Effct Green (s) 45.0 45.0 67.0 67.0 29.0 29.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.56 0.56 0.24 0.24 vie Ratio 0.02 1.10 1.20 0.43 0.18 0.97 Control Delay 23.8 76.0 136.1 17.0 38.7 81.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 23.8 76.0 136.1 17.0 38.7 81.8 LOS C E F B D F Approach Delay 75.4 88.5 78.1 Approach LOS E F E Queue Length 50th (ft) 6 -630 -582 192 25 335 Queue Length 95th (ft) 20 #890 #817 271 58 #546 Internal Link Dist (ft) 109 15 680 135 2016 Baseline Conditions -with Chann w GTC Volumes PM Peak-Hour Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. [BJL 12-163] A-5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: N Lake Washington Boulevard & Coulon Beach/Houser Way _,,. Lane Group EBL Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 663 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 Reduced vie Ratio 0.02 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length 120 Natural Cycle 110 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum vie Ratio: 1.20 Intersection Signal Delay: 81.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 131.6% Analysis Period (min) 15 -l' EBT EBR 994 0 0 0 1.10 -Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. .-- WBL -' WBT WBR Intersection LOS: F ICU Level of Service H # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 1: N Lake Washin ton Boulevard & Coulon Beach/Houser Way 2016 Baseline Conditions -with Chann w GTC Volumes Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. [BJL 12-163] ...., NBL 100 563 0 0 0 1.20 Renton Hotel t ;--\,. J. ~ NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 1038 226 448 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.43 0.18 0.97 PM Peak-Hour A-6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: N Lake Washin~ton Boulevard & Coulon Beach/Houser Wa"i. Renton Hotel .,.> "'). f -'-...., t I' \,. + ~ -Lane Graue EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations "i to "i i. "i to Volume (vph) 12 8 1031 0 0 0 639 455 6 39 432 18 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.851 0.998 0.994 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1585 0 0 0 0 1770 1859 0 1770 1852 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.121 0.487 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1585 0 0 0 0 225 1859 0 907 1852 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 630 1 2 Link Speed (mph) 25 30 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 189 95 760 215 Travel Time ( s) 5.2 2.2 20.7 5.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 13 8 1085 0 0 0 673 479 6 41 455 19 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 13 1093 0 0 0 0 673 485 0 41 474 0 Turn Type Perm NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 49.0 49.0 38.0 71.0 33.0 33.0 Total Split(%) 40.8% 40.8% 31.7% 59.2% 27.5% 27.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None Max None None Act Effct Green (s) 45.0 45.0 67.0 67.0 29.0 29.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.56 0.56 0.24 0.24 vie Ratio 0.02 1.11 1.20 0.47 0. 19 1.06 Control Delay 23.8 78.9 136.1 17.7 39.0 101.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 23.8 78.9 136. 1 17.7 39.0 101.8 LOS C E F B D F Approach Delay 78.2 86.5 96.8 Approach LOS E F F Queue Length 50th (ft) 6 -640 -582 214 25 -402 Queue Length 95th (ft) 20 #901 #817 300 58 #613 Internal Link Dist (ft) 109 15 680 135 2016 Future Conditions with Development-with Chann w GTC Volumes PM Peak-Hour Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. [BJL 12-163] A-7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: N Lake Washington Boulevard & Coulon Beach/Houser Way .,J, l' .('" -' - Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 663 988 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced vie Ratio 0.02 1.11 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum vie Ratio: 1.20 Intersection Signal Delay: 85.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 133.5% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: F ICU Level of Service H -Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 1: N Lake Washin ton Boulevard & Coulon Beach/Houser Wa t ~2 2016 Future Conditions with Development -with Chann w GTC Volumes Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. [BJL 12-163] .... NBL 100 563 0 0 0 1.20 Renton Hotel t I" \. + ~ NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 1038 219 449 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.47 0.19 1.06 PM Peak-Hour A-8 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: N Lake Washington Boulevard & Site Access Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement WBL WBR NBT Vol, veh/h 36 2 433 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free RT Channelized None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 MvmtFlow 39 2 471 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Conflicting Flow All 987 490 0 Stage 1 490 Stage 2 497 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 274 578 Stage 1 616 Stage 2 611 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 273 578 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 273 Stage 1 616 Stage 2 609 A roach WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 20 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) -281 1056 HCM Lane VIC Ratio -0.147 0.002 HCM Control Delay (s) 20 8.4 0 HCM Lane LOS C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 2016 Future Conditions with Development -with Chann w GTC Volumes Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. [BJL 12-163] Renton Hotel NBR SBL SBT 35 2 453 0 0 0 Free Free Free None None 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 38 2 492 Major2 0 509 0 4.12 2.218 1056 1056 SB 0 PM Peak-Hour A-9 Pipeline Turning Movements B N.T.S. I C s OJ C :c "' 1 l m _, Project site ,; ,a: " ~ E " "' N. 4Dth St. ~ • 1--405 XX% -percent distribution XXX -daily trips (XX) -AM peak hour b'tps [XX] -PM peak hourtr1ps ESTIMATED TRIP DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT 1----Ge,a-,,-,-Re;--,,.-rt,-P-.E.--~ FIGURE 4 159 Denny Way, #111 Seattle, WA. 9a109 Hawk'e Landing -Heel Renton.WA Page F--4 B -I Quend,11 Tennin,/5 DEIS Renton, WA /..lire Washington Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC I /l, • 405 ! 405 NII R.1nll)'i / NE 44th St 145) 45 ) (SOI 40_,f tSOt 40..,.. ~ ~ [230)190~~ " ~ ~+-45 (45) ~ Ripley Lan<-I N 44th St (25) 20-. ossJ 1ss .... ~265 1265 ~20(20) ..... f45 (180) BulMU A~e N f N JOth St (100) 85 I. ~90f90) !50) (20) (5) ~ ~ S (5) 40 15 S :i: ) t l,.o 145) 45 .J( ' Figure 9 "'"' ,::,,, .. t 20 [20) t Transportation Impact Study 405 SB bm11> I Nf 44th St l200) 200 ) I ei~90(90) ij {330) 275 ~ 9 .Jll><!f MIii Arnr11, , Lk W, ~Hl :fUTURll !195) (JOJ ~ ·~ ~ 25 \40) 150 " < rt._ ·S (·20! ) I. ' !601175 _;( :...i . .'fd.%-::f (·5) ·20 ...... Ll:WJ 81•<l !t,/3(,(h ~rtt.1 I iurllftt A,"t N Legend XX A.M. Peak Hour Project Trip (XX) P.M. Peak Hour Pro;ect Tlip Project Trip Assignment (Without 1-405 lmprovments) Quendall Terminals DEIS Renton, WA ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC Page 19 December 2, 20 I 0 B-2 • I II ii II II I • • I I I I I I I s I ~ ~ ·r 5 a I . a ~ -c, " I ____ :-_::_ ·::::::::::~=----···_-.,-_ -.-:·:·· ."":-'c' ... -_ ·: __ , ·-~-~ :== -:~~--:: ... -:--_--'-____ -~---~:-··.-::~--~--: ____ 1 ,c··· •. _'.• ···.-· .····•· •...••. • .. -·· _-.--~~-· !-,.·--. ____ ,::-, __ ...:= ·---::C-=---:::-=------=·---·----~ · ... - _.' .. --_:--:::~ :. --,.-~-----~--___ ~---,.--__ -· :-~-i':;;/i -~--;;-~:;_-· .. ---~-----. -~------, ' -·-::....:_~---' .._.._::_~.:=-.c:.-:::'.:'-c:...~:-=--·-=·--· ·.7 _.h~~'C'C;--~-..... , .. '::-::CC::..~' :=--:---~= :::--;:::~:.:::---r ,2~--:-__ :.;;;;,. =:.=·--:·::~7:c-::;;;;;;:-"'c-::::-__ :. / /(,' i "§ i j •,;,,.._~-, ----------·· -----·-···-------,----·---------------------.;1 : .:::.: ·----=::::;: == == =-= :.:E~==~'-7 -....:... .. ------::___._ ----'-. ::---=---=::=-___.=---...::....;:-~ --:=..:::= ~~-'=---:t-1fKe-~el@rQtf"2~~~, :.=:'::-::;:=:-~~~-==:---'· ---=~~~ ~) ,· ::'~ '~¥~-~ c.~5 .•. "'"7 ..:.::.:..-::...::;-.:...::.····--_-:__:-·::..~~-:=....:::.-::...;:..-··-cc; t_:·. -..::,_ .::::: --.--,;;;-~ . .-.. ::: -. -·---. --·-__ ::;;,i -------------~-------~---------_, z SE EB!h ---;:,;_-~.:. :;::--:;:::_::,-. ·--.:.::.., •. ~------~ ---1 ,: if;::: , -:;:, ' . E-;;_:;;\lr"'--+=""-'"----!---illl"'--~·,'.41~l~~;,"';,,, , , -:· ._:;·::· .--:::-.~-;;_;--:::----;-:_._;_;::.... -;:,,.---:: ::_;;.:--=\'-NE 27th S! / -.. 1 ~~-.. :::::.:·..:.·:·::;· .>::.·· .. .:..~=---~·-::.:·:··-;. I -=--=-~- ~, • . . . . -~'' ~ ,,., ~~ ~: -~>· :~ ~~ :\ ~~ --:--· -~-. ---~-::--;-:-··=-=· :·---. _,----=-=----:;..-__ -__ ·. --'\-0. -..• ,..:..:.:::-:-_-::;·:::....::..-..:,.=-.::-~.:.:::-:-..::..=-· ·-:=.::. _--··-...:....'.:."":':~ . .:.~ C •~· •. · ·•·•···•·····.····· ..•....•.... · -~ -~; ,.-::~·-----~---,-'--~C....: .. _: ____ ~:;7'-" ·:.-.:;~----·~· -~-:-··--=.--_-'-:;-::.?:,.· ·:,·:: ;~;;-=J· --~; .. ~-?-:_'' ~ ENTRANCO w z ~ ~ 0 E ~ w 900 I SE69'h~ 8-3 ' . '' \ Soi 011sc:1oas1 0 (21) 98 284 1:___ 698 41 I ) ~. (354)i ) I ' l1107) 184 _} (45) 19 _} (856) 382 .t 0 (114) 225 ) +--449 (226) (361 I 149---+ (136) 55--+ (315) 131 t I 12251 94 t io 0 (1) 2 t 4 (2) ) Ir (11) 1 --+ I 1 (11) I CB CD (14) 15) 18 18 ) +--23 (7) ) 1~, 18--+ (5) 7 _} (11) 1 ---+ I ("18) 10t 1port EIS \ 882 (461) +--134 167) \ 315 (159) -<\-2 II) ......--.5 (2) Figure 12 2004 Plan B 10 \ (923) 401~ 927 (474) 0 (21) 41 1 i 18 (34) 0 +--2 (1) (2) 0 _} I (9) --+I Legend I xxx = A.M. Peak Hour (xxx) = P.M. Peak Hour Note: in lhe distribution shown, pass- by hips are inclwied in the site trips, wnich may result in a shift of traffic from one movement to another and may result 1n a net increase or decrease offuture total trips. Site Trip Distribution B-4 AM Peak-Hour Level of Service C Quendall Tenninals DEIS Renton, WA Transportation Impact Study Symhro 6, Traffic Signal Coordi11atio11 Sojtware program was used to develop network scenarios in evaluating level of service analysis at the study intersections. Signal cycle lengths and splits were optimized to assume adjustments in optimum performance over time. use of the J)nchro 6 software program was consistent with the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Table 2 highlights existing 2009/2010 a.m. and p.m. peak hour levels of service at study area intersections. During the a.m. peak hour, Intersection #1 -Lk Wa Blvd (1-405 NB ramps) / NE 44'h Street operates at LOS E and the southbound movement at Intersection #2 -1-405 SB ramps / NE 44'h Street operates at LOS F. During the p.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS D or better. Detailed level of service summary sheets arc provided in Appendix A. Table 2: Existina 2009-201 O Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service A.M. Peak Hour Int.# Undan•Uzed Intersections LOS 1 Lake Wa Blvd (1-405 NB Ramps)/NE 44• St E 2 1-405 SB Ramps/NE 44"' Street i 3 Ripley Lane/NE 44" Street SB-D 6 Lk Wa Blvd/N 36"' Street B 7 N 30'' Street/Burnett Ave N A 8 Lk Wa Blvd/Burnett Ave N B Int.# Si1111aDzed Intersections LOS 9 Lake Wa Blvd-Garden Ave N/Park Ave N C P.M. Peak Hour Int.# Unsl1111aUzed Intersections LOS 1 Lake Wa Blvd (1-405 NB Ramps)/NE 44" St C 2 1-405 SB Ramps/NE 44"' Street SB-C 3 Ripley Lane/NE 44" Street SB-C 6 Lk Wa Blvd/N 36'" Street A 7 N 30" Street/Burnett Ave N A 8 Lk Wa Blvd/Burnett Ave N A Int.# Sl1111aDzed Intersections LOS 9 Lake Wa Blvd (Garden Ave N)/Park Ave N D :!'\Jotc: Analysis based on Synchro resu\a; using IICM 20UO control delays and LOS. Unsignalized intersections show T .OS and control delays for the worst directional movement. Public Transportation Services Delay V/C '!i~:~-- 26 0.20 1 1 - B - 13 - Delay V/C 26 0.71 Delay V/C 21 - 22 0.60 16 0. 16 10 - 8 - 10 - Delay V/C 39 0.84 No public transit service is currently provided in the project vicinity. The closest transit service in the vicinity is provided via a dial-a-ride service area and fixed route service in the vicinity of the NE 30'h Street interchange and 1-405. Nonmotorized Transportation Facilities Nonmotorized transportation facilities in the area include striped bike lanes on Lake Washington Boulevard. Lake Washington Boulevard also includes a paved 4-5 foot shoulder on the west side of the street designated for pedestrians. There are no nonmotorized ttansportation facilities on the project site. The existing railroad corridor to the east of the site was recently purchased by the Port of Seattle. The City's recently adopted Renton Trails and Bi,yde Master Plan, 2009 identifies this rail corridor near this site as a future "rails to trails" planned trail. ~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC Page 10 December 2, 20 I 0 C -1 6-Year TIP D CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2015 -2020 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Lake Washington Blvd N -Park Ave N to Gene Coulon Memorial Park Functional Classification: Collector Proj. Length: NIA Communitv Plannina Area: Citv Center TIP No. 34 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Fund: 317 Proj: 122121 CONTACT: James Wilhoit 425.430.7319 This project includes road widening, traffic signals, railroad crossings, drainage, curb, gutter, Project received a Railroad Crossing Safety grant in 2001 for the signal and gates on Lake sidewalks and bicycle lanes. Developer to design and construct improvements, and get credit toward Washington Blvd. Railroad grade crossing construction complete except for signal start- mitigation contribution. The developer is completing the project in 3 phases. up requirements. Waiting for developer to continue their construction. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: This project will serve the development and access needs to Coulon Park and the Southport The costs shown below are for the estimated mitigation credit, per agreement with the Development. Agreement with developer to credit traffic mitigation towards the costs of certain developer. Project awaiting developer's schedule to continue construction. This project will improvements. be funded by the development of Southport. 1Funded: 2 432 416 !Unfunded: I Project Totals Programmed Pre-2015 Six-Year Proaram ITEM i Proorammed Spent Pre-2014 2014 Total 2015 2016 2017 I 2018 . 2019 2020 EXPENSES: I ~la~n_i!"]g ________ ... ., ........................ 14.899 _ _ 14,899 I . f:f_aj_ir_,J_Ln_a!Y_ Ei:igineering 12,733 _12,733 ..... j.. i .. ----.. .,., .......... ----·· ---.,. i __ ......... . ............. , I R-0-W{includesAdmi~) ........ 1,983,821 ..•............. 373,821 ----------...... .... ..... j -~§§:§gg ·soo,000 1 -.. Construction .. __ 10,()_00 1,600,000 ----. --------. ------' ~go,oooL Construction Services __ . . . __ 4Q~,Q~9 . 5,029 •................• 490,000 Post ConstrudiOii" SE!rvk:es -·· 15,934. . ................................................................ I 15,934 I TOTAL EXPENSESi 2,432,416 422,416 10,000 2,000,000 ' 1,000,000 1,000,0001 SOURCE OF FUNDS: i I Vehicle Fuel Tax I 3.000 3,000 I I --------··-·· .. --···--------·- Business License Fee . ·-f 2,734 2,734 Ei:9_posed Fund Baiciflce 8.828 8,828 I .. --·· --··--- I Grants In-Hand (1) 149.501 -· -149,501 ---------... Grants In-Hand (2) I -------------------· Mftiaation In-Hand 258,353 258,353 ------·· Other (Develooer E_,,penditurel _ _1,_010,000 ----------10,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 other In-Hand (2) -------- ·-···-- Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 2,432.416 422,416 10,000 2,000 000 1 000 000 1 000,000 Cb_WA oa,on,"20'• ~Q9,>.M 5 -34 FINAL 9!i"086 'r/M 'NO.lN3~ i<l!.:liiSCl,J OC~Oij£9001 61 cQ6 ,~icu:"'o"' ·.,::005 HH:ION a~'r//\3lnos NOH)NIHSVM 3)1Vl 008~ M on"=, u,ai••111 69. 1310H N01N3c:I :)l ld Oao, C ,6 ""0 ~)·~····~ w ' ¢ • -'--'--'--'-o's .. 1 ' " ,. ~ ~ ~ Ei ~ ~ " ,9-,L ' ' ® 'f @~----~IIL--~~--11 Q ·~ I ± , ± I v I " 8 :~ fJ, I "' \~@~- Gj\· 0+ :\ \ \ G--~ -, ~av~,,.,----• ffi ,- " 'ei ·., \ \ \ \ I I \__ + @ I I l " ,, I .a-,oo .0-.1;; I I I I I I I - G "' et ' ! "'" -~-_S"l Jft-,L 9 @ \ \ \ ' .. \ \ ' 5 ~ \ "'" "'" "'" ,V-,8 ~ ~~ ~ ! J -I • .;,fg-_9z .tiu-.9 S{l·,Vrl G G 1~ fl -1~ o, s ~i;l ,i\ o; ~i ~~ I~--) 1, ' I t;:gig,:il i ['J_j/ i~;~1~1g,;~ \ \ __ " : + 8 "'" ~~ SIi-' G:~ ' " \ \ JI V .C-.tl oe ' " .6-.or \ ~ \ "'" ----·- 11:i-' + 'J I'.,-' ~ "'" "'" ;· L ,, I "'" "'" ' " " -4 .r-.1'1 @ @ \ \ -+ • I " .a-,11 t 8 .: ~ii\ \ I ! I I i I I I \ \ I ! I ' I I I ·,; \ \ \ CJ ~ z _J a::: z ,2 w O ,o: [l'. > 0 ..J <Cw_Ja.. ' (l_ ..J LI. ~ \ \ \ \ i ...... a.. ...... <( z ® ® 8 "' ;,atlllt9oc:J ;iozizgnozi e, .oo 00;6.,oso,. ·,,no,s M aoua,.,.. "-"'l•aM 09 L 011~ '"''~ "6"ao ·~·~·;·-~ I I I I / / / _ I '1 ./ I I , I \ - I' 1 'J~ ·, I' 'I ', I I I I ) -I , I -//~,· I / ( 99086 'efM 'N01N3t:I HHlON mr'1A31n08 NOl~NIHS'efM 3>tV1 00£ ~ ' ijj 1310H N01N3cl ' • .o-,oc oe 81z ~;;;o I I, ' • / ,,- / = .0. ' ,9-.l • .0. ' .0. • 'f ~~, _' ~~----·-_-_;Tr,\l _-_-_-_k !fi ;. • I i @: '=c'F"""===="=5 ,, ( -/ I I I I " Ii ® \ \ -I ' • Tu I "' "' -i I I I J ®' l I ~~~ -f~ I I . I I I --i ,] -, -, :·1 I I • ce .SH 'OM ~::WJ I II,\ .0. ' " \ \ \ Q/118 N018~1HS\I.\\ 3~'(1 \ \ \/ \ \ I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ' I \ \ \ ~ I I ~i~ \ :I? \ / v Lr?\ 1'y / !:: "' :i: X w / / '"1. \ \ \-' z ; 2: " "' z z z :I .. z ~ .. "' ~ 0 .:.; ~ < 1--9 :::> <( ... 0 I! f----t----070+--,! I ~o·-~ ~ii ~· \ '' '' ' - \ '\ ----\ ----:----- ~ ...-- ...-- <( z z :'S a._ ii' 0 9 ~ 0 z ::, 0 O' 0: CJ ~~