The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReport 01CJR Engineering Civil -Structural Engineering Comprehensive Project Management Project: ' ·..I ' J Ripley Ln Renton, WA 98056 Prepared for: Bob Dye Parcel Number: 334330-2780-06 ' ' ! cc.R. I I ' / I I ! /II /l 6'-,· Lot Size: 3990 sq. ft f- ~LIN-'~--- ' b ~.1·~7/ WATER LINE ~I ' " ·,. b ' " 14' -10· I I 6~'-1·i 12·-,)"1 i4·--1i'· .. ,. 11 I >- i ·, • ."-;~-~-Ai-ii( .. .J::~. ~~ J. AO..,"' ~---.k'---. ~\ ~ ! ::.~;.~·~··S·"'~ .... 01'"\ "' '( ;,:, •c,. '(;,. t l/1:;' . , 'l\."~· <Ii( Jk.. 4 \ I ---l ~ .11· I· \,, -J ,.. · ··.;., 1 \ i~'...~~l:J: ") ll,Q_··.• ..,·.•:.,·~ ... ~'...' ~..,, s/ "''"··-::-·r,,s,f.,>; ."" I 1 • *'' --~ "'"~-..; ss,oNAL t"-1' .. ,.-,..,._...,..,....,.. ·rv\J!(:F:~-6/2W o-~q<-;~-~ ·.:.. ... '_ .'· "._ .... ~ -·-~ ,J...4 ____ 'A Project Description: To construct a parking pad and Retaining wall to avoid parking Along small lane and obstructin1 Traffic and to enable wheelchail Access to the entrance Legal Description: YI\ ~ '. "'"' IW/ffffff/.@ff/ff-0'/-0'ffff/-· .. ·,. ' '\ . I I ' "I r;;j Northerly 16.8 ft of Lot 29 and All of Lot 28, Block "C", C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Addi· To Seattle, Division Number 3 •, ' ' .L.: " : FliOPO(fY ,I/IE , Footprint size of Constructed Bldgs: 1330 sq. ft. / I • -12 feet i / ~ ..J (l_ 0: 'o ' 1 • 'I -,:;--I •-·'t f ' . ~ ,_,_.. . . . p "-21 -2 I _, , -.._ ,c .. ,,i>/ .\·-•, -. Proposed Driveway l" / ! . ! North I 1, SITE PLAN SCA1[: 1" :;c; 2G' -9 Y, feet -8 Y, feet CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/ BUILDING/ PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM Date: January 2, 2008 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: LUA (file) Number: Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Acceptance Date: Applicant: Owner: Contact: PID Number: ERC Approval Date: ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Approval: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Mylar Recording Number: Dye Parking Pad LUA-07-094, SME, V-A, ECF Elizabeth Higgins September 5, 2007 Patrick Dye Same Same 3343302780 September 24, 2007 October 15, 2007 October 3, 2007 October 17, 2007 Date: Date: Project Description: The applicant has requested an environmental determination, variance from development standards, and shoreline exemption certificate for approval of construction of a parking pad. The site is located in both King County and City of Renton. The area of the proposed work is within the City of Renton. Critical areas in the form of steep slopes are on the site. Location: 7029 Ripley Lane SE Comments: Bob/Patrick Dye 7029 Ripley Lane N Renton, WA 98056 tel: (425) 227-4747 eml: dyerdye@comcast.net (contact) Updated: 08/31/07 PARTIES OF RECORD DYE PARKING PAD LUA07-094, SME, ECF, V-A, (Page 1 of 1) CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT EXEMPTION FILE: PROJECT NAME: OWNER: APPLICANT/CONTACT PROJECT MANAGER: PROPOSAL: PROJECT LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEC-TWN-R: WATER BODY: October 29, 2007 LUA-07-094, SME, V-A, ECF Dye Parking Shoreline Exemption Patrick Dye Bob Dye 7029 Ripley Lane N Renton, WA 98056 Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner Applicant is proposing to construct a nine foot (9') retaining wall at an existing single-family residence located within 200 feet of the shoreline of Lake Washington. The wall would support a one-vehicle concrete-paved parking pad. The wall and parking area are within the side setback area for the residence. An administrative variance to allow this reduction of the setback area was previously approved by the Development Services Division of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department of the City of Renton. Lake Washington is designated as an Urban Shoreline Environment at this location. 7029 Ripley Lane N The Northerly 16.8 feet of Lot 29 and all of Lot 28, Block 'C', G.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, DIVISION NO. 3, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page(s) 81, records of King County, Washington. TOGETHER WITH Second Class Shore Lands adjoining. SITUATE in the County of King, State of Washington. NE % T29-S24-R5 Lake Washington Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline Management.doc An exemption from a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit is hereby granted on the proposed project described on the attached form for the following reason(s): X Construction of a single-family residence or associated structures for the use by the owner or owner's family. The retaining wall and concrete parking pad are structures associated with a single-family residence and are intended for the use of the owner and/or owner' family. The proposed development is consistent or inconsistent with (check one): CONSISTENT xx N/A Attachments: Vicinity Map Site Plan cc: Owner Applicant/Contact File INCONSISTENT Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline Management.doc Policies of the Shoreline Management Act. The guidelines of the Department of Ecology where no Master Program has been finally approved or adapted by the Department. The Master Program. ii I ' .: I ' " ,, 'i \ CA NE 43rd I ~ ZONING ~ = TECIINICAL Sl!llVICIIS SE 72nd St. I NE 50th St. SE 80th St. C4 • 32 T24N R5E E 1/2 D 270 -'OO 1 ----ReDtoi:t. C!lt, ~ 11"800 29 T24N R5E E 1/2 S429 CJR Engineering C Civil -Structural Engineering JI::) Comprehensive Project Management tt"'\.. Project: I Ll l J Ripley Ln Renton, WA 98056 Prepared for: Bob Dye j Parcel Number: ! 334330-2780-06 Lot Size: 3990 sq. ft """""'""" E'lCl!ND 'fCl liEDIAN WATEll UNE I f'!IIJPERT'f tli'IE ~ • --,---- ~ " " ' ;, ~ ,_ "o ;;: -----f'~~~INE 6'-2'" s·-r I Footprint size of Constructed Bldgs: 1330 sq. ft. tTl >< N ::r: ....... • co ....... -12 feet ,-...J 74'-10· 24'-2f W-11i" 12·-o•I ii·-,t· .,/ ~ t ' ' ----'-/ --1+-'~ l;:; -~ ,, -,-'rJ, -,i- ( \ I I I -9 Y, feet ,-g y, feet J " :i: ~I .JI ~I ~ Project Description: To construct a parking pad and Retaining wall to avoid parking Along small lane and obstructin1 Traffic and to enable wheelchail Access to the entrance Legal Description: Northerly 16.8 ft of Lot 29 and All of Lot 28, Block "C", C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington i· To Seattle, Division Number 3 Proposed Driveway \' I i North -=S:..:.IT..:....:=~:...~-¥-ef'-flE~%NING SCALE: I" = 20' AUG 2 2 2007 RECEIVED CIT1~ OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P,E,, Administrator 0~(\'.Y ~~ il:D ·~ + ~ ::!! ~ Kathy Keolker, Mayor ?3Ncf0)~---------------------------- October 29, 2007 Bob Dye 7029 Ripley Lane N Renton, WA 98056 SUBJECT: Dye Parking Pad LUA07-094, SME, V-A, ECF Dear Mr. Dye: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended for both the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated and Administrative Variance approval for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination and the Administrative Variance approval, therefore, the decisions are final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. Also, please see the enclosed Certificate of Exemption fro~ Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at ( 425) 430-7382. For the Environmental Review Committee, Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner Enclosure cc: Patrick Dye I Owner -------l-0-55_S_o_u_ili_G_r_oo~y-W_a_y ___ R_e-nt_o_n,-W-~-hi_ngto_n_g_80_5_7------~ @ This ~per contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE City o ,ton Department of Planning I Building I Pu Vorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA07-094, SME, V-A, ECF APPLICANT: Patrick D e Pad SITE AREA: 3,990 s uare feet BUILDING AREA LOCATION: 7029 Ripley Lane SE WORK ORDER NO: 77801 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested an environmental determination, variance from development standards, and shoreline exemption certificate for approval of construction of a parking pad. The site is located in both King County and City of Renton. The area of the proposed work is within the City of Renton. Critical areas in the form of steep slopes are on the site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable Man, Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable Man, Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinn Air Aesthetics Water UahtlG!are Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals TranSnortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy! Natural Resources Histon"c!Cu/tural Preservation Airporl Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or~9z~ ~resentative )D··9-D1 Date 92 93 455 1 81 ?6 T24N R4E 25 T2~ ·.f14l;, ..... 89 B\ .. ,so'r~.4N);i5E t9T24N As 81 94W' 455W C2 36 T24N R4E 31 T24N RSE 3Q§ ; 307 =• .008 '3b9. D3 \D4··D -:'D; ··:1· ·.···.·.·· .. i:©.·. z.· ·.· -.. . ' . ,' ',• ·.· ' il23N.R,4E \1 ";j3f.f~4~- 334 G1 T23N A4E 44 .. 1-11 , . . .·. 6: T23N R5E T23N'R5E'. 3·.··.·1.\.·.. c: .. -•. -... ·"' .:/ 3' .. 319 9.T23N ASE 370 464 ! -----·-' C6 -c7 sd 4N ASE 8tO 8rrl ........ iraf;,· .....• ~·. 821 . H6 ···.···H:•f{ .. ·· '. ·, ·.'. '· ;:, "'' /r2s_~ R4E. ia-T2~N RS.E ·2?_T28N ASE 26 T23Nflsf 22N R4E 60:r -·--1,3 ' 36 T23N R4E 31 T23fJ RSE 607 608 I J2 1 T22NB4E 6 T22N RsE' BESIDENIU,L ~ Reeource Conservation ~ Re11identia.l l du/ac g Re11identid 4 du/ac ~ Residential B du/ac ~ Residential Manufactured Homes \ R-lD \ Residential JO du/ac \ 11-1~ \ Residential 1-4, du/ac \ RM-F \ Residential Nulti-FamilY 605 825 >849;. IS,"· l6 ·····"l7 33 T23N R'& ·; , ' j,i T23N f!SE 35 T23N ASE '610 833 -J5· 'J6 J7 S·T22N ASE 4 ~2N'R5E " 3 T22N R5E 2 T22N ASE MilCEP llfIB CENTER ~ Center Villa1:e juc-Nl] Urban Center -North 1 )uc-N2j Urban Center -North 2 0 Center Downtown• ~ Commercie.1/0ffice/Residential COMMFROA.L 0 Commercial Arterial• ~ CommercieJ Office• INDUSTRlAL W Industrial -Heavy ~ IndustrieJ -Medium CJD Industrial -Light (P) Public!y o,raed -----Renton City LlmlUI -·-·-Adjacent City Limits -Book Pe.res Boundary E 25 8 u 3€ ,oo, 1T2 \RH-TI Residential Mull.i-F&.milY Tl"aditional [~M-U I Residential Multi-Family Urban Center" ~ Commercial Nei1:hborhood KROLL PAGE Printed by Print & Mall Services, City of Renton • May include OverlllJ" Districts. See Appendb: maps. For additional regulations In Overlay Districte, please see RM:C -4-3. PAGE# INDEX Renton City Limits Parcels Renton S CALE 1 : 2 ,397 l-f=~io-iiiil~~:::J,....,~==========:11~~~~~~1 ==========. 200 0 200 400 600 FE ET http://rentonnet.org/MapGuide/maps/Parcel.mwf EXHIBIT 3 N A Tuesday , Septembe r 04 , 2007 4 :18 PM Renton City Limits Parcels ~ ~ 20 SCA LE 1 : 3 00 ~ I 0 20 FEET http ://re nton net.o rg/Ma p G uid e/ma p s/Parcel.mwf Renton I 4 0 60 EXHIBI T 4 N A Tuesday, Septe mber 04, 2007 4: 18 PM CJR Engineering GJ Civil -Structural Engineering Comprehensive Project Management il ~ Pro_ject: ',J ) , Ripley Ln Renton, WA 98056 Prepared for: Bob Dye Parcel Number: 334330-2780-06 ( /' / I I I // I---""""" ";-- C'-.' 2,·_ C Lot Size: 3990 sq. ft / / !I I I ·~i~ I f Tl ,;!~1===:::t==t~-;;;;;;,-:;;;;;;,;;;;;;;;% / \ ~ i • \ "r ~ \+-- I \ / \ ' / J_______;, 'If\ .. -\ \ I ·, 6,~ -I ,t· . 2"-0"' 2•·-1,t" '-··· -+d e ' a :r " ' ·' f-----~;;;;;;;-,.,'c'---i-, I 1-t L ~ 11 ~ , G -~: 2~'-2i" ~-~• O'-H' "-,· = 11 w-·,,f· / _\ I I I I I -Footprint size of Constructed Bldgs: 1330 sq. ft. tTJ >< V, :::r:: ..... t:O ..... >-l ' -12 feet ' I I ' I I I I ' \ -9 y, feet '8 Y, feet J • ~I 01 z, -'I d _J a. °' ~ ----_. ( ~/-o:;·_ \ __ >= ,...__ ~ ' ,. ~;[ i< C ;.:;i • Project Description: To construct a parking pad and Retaining wall to avoid parking Along small lane and obstructin1 Traffic and to enable wheelchai1 Access to the entrance Legal Description: Northerly 16.8 ft of Lot 29 and All of Lot 28, Block "C", C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Addi To Seattle, Division Number 3 Proposed Driveway /\" North s IT~'~E~f~~fliNC~ SCA_~: i .. = ::::ic:' U" • ., 7007 A I; / / .. , RECl~!VEO ' . ~ -~ \ I ~ r ,_ ( L <;" ~ !.::, ,o . '\ -+-.., '-, '> ..., ~ 0 .,, s t' V\ v I..A \j\ \.A ;t 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 "' f-\ .. \ 0 ~ ~ ..,,,, ~<;: j w J-p AUG 2 2 2087 ~ ~ & \' r) ~ 0 :,--' r6 ~ .s= cJ::, r-0 :,' -°' ~3 l~ c:£. GS o" ~ -4 C6 ('-\ \.A I...-, 0 .,., OS OS- i~ :sT EXHIBIT 6 ST A TE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on September 29, 2007. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $126.00. ~#??//~ 'Linda M. Mills Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter ,,,,,,,,, Subscribed and sworn to me this 1" day of October, 2007. ----":-~'( DAls''•,, . r,. --~'"' . • .. • .. . • ~<>' ,, -·,11-.• \ON '• ' : 'I:' .. •',<;$ "-+: '•, '• : .~ ~ ~... \ : !J,:\oTAAyi;, ~ -: : u .~ U): ~ r the State of Washington, Residing in Covington, 'tr.ishi.tw_ton : ~ : ' · .6iJist..'"' · -, ~(J)·. .:o:: ,,~·-. :1··".: ',, "l'x·.!_o.19.q .. ·:.-"~ _: ,, (' ........ y,.,~---•,,,Or: WAS ,---''"-\,,,,, ............... NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non·Significance- Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. Dye Parking Pad LUA07-094, SME, V-A, ECF Location: 7029 Ripley Lane N. Applicant has requMt.ed approval to construct a concrete pad, supported by a retaining wall, for vehicular parking abutting an existing, single-family residence. The site is located within 200 feet of the OHWM: of Lake Washington. It would require conslnKtion on a slope that has been deemed a Critical Area by virtue of its grade. The proposed project requires Environmental (SEPA) Review. An Administrative Setback Variance, a Modification from Critic:al Areas regulations, and a Shoreline Eiemption would be processed separately. The property is divided by the line between unfocorporated King County and the City of Renton. The project area would be on the south portion of the property, which liM within Renton. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on October 15, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4·8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be oblained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, {425} 430- 6510. Published in the Renton Reporter September 29, 2007. #864188. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTr:::RESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT f.lAME· Dy& Parking Pad PROJECT NUMBER: LUA07-094. SME. V-A, ECF LOCATION: 7029 Ripley lane N DESCRIPTION: Th& applicant has requested approval to construct a concrete pad, supported by a retaining wall, for vehicular parking abutting an uisfmg, smgle-family residence. The site is located within 200 feet of the Ordinary High Water Mark of Lak& Washington. It would require construction 011 a slope that has been daomed a Critical Area by virtue of its grade. The proposed project requires Envlronm&ntal (SEPA) Review. An Administrative Variance, a Modification from Critical Areas regulat,ons, and a Shoreline Exemption would be proce.s.sed separately. The property is divided by the line between unincorporated l<ing C,;,unty and the City ,;,f Renton. The project area would be on the south portion of the property, which lies within Renton. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL RE:VIEVV COMMITIEE 1ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AppH!s of the environmental determination must be filed in wriling on or before 5:00 PM on October 15, 2007. AppHIS must be filed in writmg together with the requfred $75.00 application fee with: HN.rlng Examiner. City of Renlon, 1055 South Grady Way. Renton, WA 9SQ57. Appeals to the Examiner are govemed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4·0·110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office. (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION I, s;_.,..t.f ~r&L-hereby certify that 'J copies of the above document were posted by me in ___J_ conspicuous places or nearby the described property on DATE:_1,.L=.'k'IL'll~---~ ~ . ,_, __ ''"\\\ __ ''_ 1 111 __ ( __ ~~ .;o:";:,. \_Yt-JN f.-l,.'111_ SIGNED: ~; ~ :::-"<# _ .:·.··,,,, 11,~11 =,J -. _, A TIEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in ~:-V-.-:._,"' ,!to\· L,+ . .-~' ·, ;'\\ /) ~ .,~-_-. -·; § ...,S..,L.,.c,,._@~~-, on the =±_7_t-_ day of Cl,jc /J:<--, .G'.,,, ... 3,,.,~a.c:1:'.l N~-?r-J?Y,,G .:: : N TARYP BLIC SI , ,,;_'11-,{,'"".1()~~,. ,-i""o~ff ~1 "\' /· .... , ' ,,,~ .... <'\:; -. ,, o,..:i,11\,\\\'"''\\6 ;::- 1111 ;,~/.A.SI-\\ ':'o.'-~ hn,,_,\,,,,, ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Dye Parking Pad PROJECT NUMBER: LUA07-094, SME, V-A, ECF LOCATION: 7029 Ripley Lane N DESCRIPTION: The applicant has requested approval to construct a concrete pad, supported by a retaining wall, for vehicular parking abutting an existing, single-family residence. The site is located within 200 feet of the Ordinary High Water Mark of Lake Washington. It would require construction on a slope that has been deemed a Critical Area by virtue of its grade. The proposed project requires Environmental ($EPA) Review. An Administrative Variance, a Modification from Critical Areas regulations, and a Shoreline Exemption would be processed separately. The property is divided by the line between unincorporated King County and the City of Renton. The project area would be on the south portion of the property, which lies within Renton. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on October 15, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. '"(\'.Y o CIT.OF RENTON +O~,~~ ;.¢;+ Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department ~ :!! ~ Kathy Keolker, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator ~N~o:.-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- September 27, 2007 Bob Dye 7029 Ripley Lane N Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Dye Parking Pad LUA07-094, SME, V-A, ECf Dear Mr. Dye: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject. project and have issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed ERC Staff Report, Section D for a list of the Mitigation Measures. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed iu writing on or before 5:00 PM on October 15, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Rertton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7382. For the Environmental Review Committee, £¥i10-<ft.. J~~ Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner cc: Patrick Dye / Owner Enclosure ~ ------,-0-,---55_S_o-uth_G_ra_d_y_W_a_y_-R-e-n-to_n_, W-as-hi-ng-t-on-98-0-57 _______ R E N T Q N @ This paper contains 50% recycled material, 3?% post consumer AH"EAD O,F TH-E ·CURVE '\,<\'.y 0 ~~~ CIT' OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator :?~<, Kathy Keolker, Mayor ?i>N,to,,------------------------ September 27, 2007 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determination Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on September 24, 2007: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED PROJECT NAME: Dye Parking Pad PROJECT NUMBER: LUA07-094, SME, V-A, ECF LOCATION: 7029 Ripley Lane N DESCRIPTION: The applicant has requested approval to construct a concrete pad, supported by a retaining wall, for vehicular parking abutting an existing, single-family residence. The site is located within 200 feet of the Ordinary High Water Mark of Lake Washington. It would require construction on a slope that has been deemed a Critical Area. by virtue of its grade. The proposed project requires Environmental (SEPA) Review. An Administrative Variance, a Modification from Critical Areas regulations, and a Shoreline Exemption would be processed separately. The property is divided by the line between unincorporated King County and the City of Renton. The project area would be on the south portion of the property, which lies within Renton. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on October 15, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055· South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process maybe obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at ( 425) 430-7382. For the Environmental Review Committee, £3tl7,0-d/_ .J~r=-- Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW, Stewart Reinbold David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) _E_n_c_lo_su_r..,..e ---l-05_5_S_o_u_th_G_ra_d_y_W_a_y ___ R_e-nt-o-n,-W-as-hin-gto_n_9_80_5_7 ______ ~ @ This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA07-094, SME, V-A, ECF Bob Dye; 7029 Ripley Lane N; Renton, WA 98055 Dye Parking Pad DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval to construct a concrete pad, supported by a retaining wall, for vehicular parking abutting an existing, single-family residence. The site is located within 200 feet of the Ordinary High Water Mark of Lake Washington. It would require construction on a slope that has been deemed a Critical Area by virtue of its grade. The proposed project requires Environmental (SEPA) Review. An Administrative Variance, a Modification ·from Critical Areas regulations, and a Shoreline Exemption would be processed separately. The property is divided by the line between unincorporated King County and the City of Renton. The project area would be on the south portion of the property, which lies within Renton. · · LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 7029 Ripley Lane N (parcel no. 3343302780) The City of Renton . Department of Planning/BUilding/Public Works Development Planning Section 1. The recommendations of the "Geotechnical Engineering Report (GER)," by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc., dated March 13, 2007, sllall be followed forproject design and construction. 2. · The applicant shall be required to provide a T~lllporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined . in Volume II of the most recent Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual. 3. If construction occurs during the :;wet season" (October 1 to April 30), the project .shall be subject to special erosion control provisions detailed in Appendix D of.the King County Surface Water Manual. _ERC Mitigation Measures CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA07-094, SME, V-A, ECF Bob Dye; 7029 Ripley Lane N; Renton, WA 98055 Dye Parking Pad DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval to construct a concrete pad, supported by a retaining wall, for vehicular parking abutting an existing, single-family residence. The site is located within 200 feet of the Ordinary High Water Mark of Lake Washington. It would require construction on a slope that has been deemed a Critical Area by virtue of its grade. The proposed project requires Environmental (SEPA) Review. An Administrative Variance, a Modification from Critical Areas regulations, and a Shoreline Exemption would be processed separately. The property is divided by the line between unincorporated King County and the City of Renton. The project area would be on the south portion of the property, which lies within Renton. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 7029 Ripley Lane N (parcel no. 3343302780) The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information proviqed in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process tor environmental determinations. Planning 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30. am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otheiwise approved by the Development Services Division. 2. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be. restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. Building 1. A grading license is required forthe proposed work. 2. A fill source statement is required to be completed for the fill to be brought in. · , 3. A building permit for the wall is required. ERG Advisory· Notes Page 1 of 1 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA07-094, SME, V-A, ECF APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: Bob Dye; 7029 Ripley Lane N; Renton, WA 98055 Dye Parking Pad DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval to construct a concrete pad, supported by a retaining wall, for vehicular parking abutting an existing, single-family residence. The site is located within 200 feet of the Ordinary High Water Mark of Lake Washington. It would require construction on a slope that has been deemed a Critical Area by virtue of its grade. The proposed project requires Environmental (SEPA) Review. An Administrative Variance, a Modification from Critical Areas regulations, and a Shoreline Exemption would be processed separately. The property is divided by the line between unincorporated King County and the City of Renton. The project area would be on the south portion of the property, which lies within Renton. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 7029 Ripley Lane N (parcel no. 3343302780) The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on October 15, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office. (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: September 29, 2007 September 24, 2007 D?i{ i 9/CJ 7 I. David Daniels, Fire Chief Fire Department _'-__.__.~ ------=-~===----q/ [)5/ U) Teri)r Higashiyama, Administrator Date Community Services Date ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE September 24, 2007 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator I. David Daniels, Fire Chief Alex Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning Meeting Date: Monday, September 24, 2007 Time: 3:00 PM Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Agenda listed below. THE FOLLOWING IS A CONSENT AGENDA Dye Parking Pad (Higgins) LUA07-094, SME, V-A, ECF The applicant has requested approval to construct a concrete pad, supported by a retaining wall, for vehicular parking abutting an existing, single-family residence. The site is located within 200 feet of the Ordinary High Water Mark of Lake Washington. It would require construction on a slope that has been deemed a Critical Area by virtue of its grade. The proposed project requires Environmental (SEPA) Review. An Administrative Variance, a Modification from Critical Areas regulations, and a Shoreline Exemption would be processed separately. The property is divided by the line between unincorporated King County and the City of Renton. The project area would be on the south portion of the property, which lies within Renton. cc: K. Keolker, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer S. Dale Estey, EDNSP Director® C. Walls, Fire Prevention N. Watts, P/B/PW Development Services Director ® F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner M. Peterson. Fire Prevention ® J. Medzegian, Council P. Hahn, P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R. Lind, Economic Development L. Warren, City Attorney ® ienton Department of Planning I Building IP · · Works City ENVIRONMENTAL ~ DEVELOPMENT APPLIC~ ION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: r:z ,,;'I J·Vl, e-. COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA07-094. SME. V-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 5, 2007 APPLICANT: Patrick Dve PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Hinnins PROJECT TITLE: Dve Parkina Pad PLAN REVIEW: Kavren Kittrick SITE AREA: 3,990 sauare feet BUILDING AREA (gross): NIA LOCATION: 7029 Ripley Lane SE I WORK ORDER NO: 77801 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested an environmental determination, variance from development standards, and shoreline exemption certificate for approval of construction of a parking pad. The site is located in both King County and City of Renton. The area of the proposed work is within the City of Renton. Critical areas in the form of steep slopes are on the site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minar Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earlh Housiflrl. Air Aesthetics Water UnhVG/are Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transoortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Natural Resources Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feef 14,000 Feel 8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional in~ rmation is needed }D properlK assess this proposal. fc:&t ",' L,/~,d t:f:p{l? 14){; Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 'en ton Department of Planning I Building IP Works City ENVIRONMENTAL "' DEVELOPMENT APPL IC~, ION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA07-094, SME, V-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 5, 2007 :::0 APPLICANT: Patrick Dve PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Hinnins Q ~ ,:-1 v, I I ----'---P-'--'R"'O"'J-=E-"C--'-T---'T--'-IT,__,Lc,E:;.:___,D:e>v,_,,e'-'P---'a"'-r'"ki:.:na"-'-P"'-a"-d----------+--'-P-=LA=N'-'R-"E=-V'--'1-=E-'-'W'-':---'K-"a=v'rec,n:..,Kc.::i:,,tt'-"ric:::.k'-------------'c'z-,-<-i--=l'Tin....J(") ----"'S'--'IT-'=E"-A-"-R-"E"-A"-: _,3'.c, 9c,9:.s0..:es=aua"'-re"--'-'fe'-"e'---t ----------+B,ecU,eclc,cL_,::D::._I N:..::G::..:Ac.::R.o:E::'.A_,_=1 rnro'-'s"'-sL l: -'--'N"-'-/ A_,__ ______ ~::\.<:.--;. ·-nl--~O;.-rn LOCATION: 7029 Riolev Lane SE WORK ORDER NO: 77801 ~~ ..::; < ----="'-'=='---'=='-==------L'-'-"=-'-"=="---'-'--'""--'---------------\~4!=2----rn SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested an environmental determination, variance from development ~arm', and shoreline exemption certificate for approval of construction of a parking pad. The site is located in both King County <itri,j City of CJ Renton. The area of the proposed work is within the City of Renton. Critical areas in the form of steep slopes are on the site.w A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earlh Housinn Air Aesthetics Water unht!Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transoortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy! Natural Resources Hisforic!Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POL/CY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed properly assess this proposal. C/-7-Ol Date City !en ton Department of Planning I Building IP ·-Works ENVIRONMENTAL ,.. DEVELOPMENT APPLIC~. ION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: r , .· .. ,e_ COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA07-094, $ME, V-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 5, 2007 APPLICANT: Patrick Dve PROJECT MANAGER: Elizab --=--.AS - '' 1·., 1:_; r ·: -. PROJECT TITLE: Dve Parkino Pad PLAN REVIEW: Kavren Kittri "-, --s ;i -, SITE AREA: 3,990 sauare feet BUILDING AREA lnrossl: N/A LOCATION: 7029 Riolev Lane SE WORK ORDER NO: 77801 . -. f l ' u L/ SEP -5 . i ?nm i ,' ! ; .' J i. , . ' '' SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested an environmental determination, vs iance~opment stand~ras; and shoreline exemption certificate for approval of construction of a parking pad. The site is loqated in bot~'1ill!i!,~ y of Renton. The area of the proposed work is within the City of Renton. Critical areas in the form of """0 n °1ooesll!FEU11l. h!I .it~Oi, -------~=---,.i....-1 -I -· A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housfno Arr Aesthetics Waler unht1Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnorl.ation Environmental Health Public Services Energy! Natural Resources Historic/Cultural PreseNalion Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet '-17/;J B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application wit particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are)_ where addit~anal information is needed to p~perly assess this proposal. . .. . t2.L/!..fL) ignature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Q / ·() 7~ '7 ··c~ - 1enton Deparlment of Planning I Building I, ·, Works Cit, ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT APPLIC ... ION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (:._,HVo-tT'~·,, ,,,-i ce; 1<:..s. COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA07-094, SME, V-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 5, 2007 APPLICANT: Patrick Dve PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Hiaains . . . .. . ... , PROJECT TITLE: Dve Parkinq Pad PLAN REVIEW: Kavren Kittrick RECEIVED SITE AREA: 3,990 square feet BUILDING AREA (qrossl: NIA LOCATION: 7029 Riolev Lane SE WORK ORDER NO: 77801 _ • , 8\IILu11,<.o u1v•,•·- SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested an environmental determination, variance from aevelopment standards, and shoreline exemption certificate for approval of construction of a parking pad. The site is located in both King County and City of Renton. The area of the proposed work is within the City of Renton. Critical areas in the form of steep slopes are on the site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable Mare Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housin" Air Aesthetics Water UnhVG/are Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Natural Resources HistoridCultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wh additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ,ve Date City tenton Department of Planning I Building IP · · Works ENVIRONMENTAL -DEVELOPMENT APPLIC ION REVIEW SHEET COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA07-094, SME, V-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 5, 2007 APPLICANT: Patrick Dve PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth HiolilrE C E I V E D PROJECT TITLE: Dve Parkina Pad PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 3,990 sauare feet BUILDING AREA /aross): N/A JI IL[lN(i L)IVISION LOCATION: 7029 Riolev Lane SE WORK ORDER NO: 77801 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested an environmental determination, variance from development standards, and shoreline exemption certificate for approval of construction of a parking pad. The site is located in both King County and City of Renton. The area of the proposed work is within the City of Renton. Critical areas in the form of steep slopes are on the site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housin"' Air Aesthetics Waler Linhl/G!are Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy! Natural Resources Histodc!Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition I infor. atjon is needed to properly assess this proposal. enton Department of Planning I Building IP : Works City ENVIRONMENTAL .. DEVELOPMENT APPLIC~, ION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA07-094, SME, V-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 5, 2007 APPLICANT: Patrick Dve PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Hinnins PROJECT TITLE: Dye Parkinq Pad PLAN REVIEW: Kavren Kittrick SITE AREA: 3,990 square feet BUILDING AREA (nross): NIA LOCATION: 7029 Ripley Lane SE I WORK ORDER NO: 77801 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested an environmental determination, variance from development standards, and shoreline exemption certificate for approval of construction of a parking pad. The site is located in both King County and City of Renton. The area of the proposed work is within the City of Renton. Critical areas in the form of steep slopes are on the site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable Mon, Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Linht!Gfare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utifities Animals Transnortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Natural Resources Historic!Culturaf PreseNation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POL/CY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Cit 1enton Department of Planning I Building I. ·c Works ENVIRONMENTAL ~ DEVELOPMENT APPLIC~ .·10N REVIEW SHEET COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 .J APPLICATION NO: LUA07-094, SME, V-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 5, 2007 APPLICANT: Patrick Dve PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Hiaains PROJECT TITLE: Dve Parkina Pad PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 3,990 sauare feet BUILDING AREA (aross): N/A LOCATION: 7029 Ripley Lane SE I WORK ORDER NO: 77801 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested an environmental determination, variance from development standards, and shoreline exemption certificate for approval of construction of a parking pad. The site is located in both King County and City of Renton. The area of the proposed work is within the City of Renton. Critical areas in the form of steep slopes are on the site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element at the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinn Air Aesthetics Water LinhVG/are Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) OATE: LAND USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT LOCATION: September 5. 2007 LUA07-094, SME. V-A. ecr Dye Pork,ng Pad The appl1canl has requested a,, enviro11mental determ1n:,l1or., var;ance from development standarcs, ,rnd shoreli;fl e,empl1on ,;:ert,f1cate for approval of const·uction of a parking pad The silfl ,s l<:>caled ,n both Kmg County and City of Renton T;e area of the pcoposed work ,s w1lhrr1 the C,ty of Renton Cr.tical are.is ,~ the form ol sleeo slopes are on the site 7029 R,~le1· Lane SE OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED {ONS-M): As the Lead Age~cy, the City of Renton has determine,;: that s1gn~1rnnt rnv,ronmemal iripacts are u~likely lo result from the propose<J pro.,ect Therefore, as perm111ed under lhe RC,V 43.21 C 110 the City of Reroton ,s us1~g lhe Opt1ona: DNS-M process to give notice lha1 a DNS- M 1s l1~e1y to be issued Comment oenods 'or th~ pro1ect anc the proposed DNS-M are 1nleArnled irto a sin~le com,wml period There w:I' be no comment penod fallowinsi the issuance o' the Thresholc Determma'.ion o' Non-Significance- M1t,gated iDNS-M). A 14-cay appeal perioci will follow •.he ,ssuance of the ONS-M PERMIT APPLICATION DATE· NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: flugu;t 22, 2007 SeptemC>er 5, 2007 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON• Bob Dye, tel: 425-227--4747, eml: dyerdye@comcast.ne1 Permibl/Revlew Requested· Environmental (SEPAJ Review, Administretlve Variance, Shoreline Exemption Permil other Permi!s which may be required· NIA Requested Sludies· Environmental Checklist, Engin&&dng Report, Geote<::hnlcal Report Location where application may be reviewed: Plannlng/Bullding/Public Worb Department, Development Services OMsion, Shcth Floor Ren1on City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Eva!uate the Proposed Project: Development Rugulatlon$ Used For Project Mitigation; The sub1ect s,1e 1s designated Res1den11al Single Family (RSF) on the City of Renton C[)mprehenswe Land Use Map and Res1dent1al -S (R-8) or the City's Zoning Map Enkonrnen\al (SEPA) Checklist TOO projP.c\ will be aubJect to the City's SEPA ordrnance, R-8 development stancards and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriale. Proposed M~igatlon Measures: ~Hicialion Measures may oe impose{! on Ille propose<:: project. Mitigation Measures addrns~ project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulatio.~s as c1led above Corr-rr,enls u·, the above a;:,pl1cat,on mus\ be suom1lted n wnltng to El1mbeth H1gg1ns, Senior Planner, Development Services_ D1v1sion. 1 055 Soutn GracJy Way, Renton, WA 98057. Uy 5 00 PM on September· 9, 2V07. If you have questions about th1; prcp~sal, or wish to be made a pacly of hlC0°d and receive additional notifcat1on t,y ma'i, co.~tac1 the ProJBct M~n~ger. Anyone ".'ho sub:r1rts written comments will automat,c:,11)" became a ~arty 0f record :and will be notifie<:l of any cec s,on on this p.co1ect CONTACT PERSON: Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner; Tel: {425) 430-7382; Eml: ehiggJns@ci.renton.wa.us PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJEC7 NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If _you would like to be madti a party ot record to receive further information on th,s proposed pro1ect. complete th,s form and rmurn 1c City of Renton, Development Planning. 1055 So Grady Way. Ren1on. WA 98057 Name/Fi!e No· Dye Parking Pad/LUA0?-094. SME. V-fl, ECF NAME MAILING ADDRESS· TELEPHONE NO. CERTIFICATION I, ,e;, Z-l(h-di..... Hu11/n 5 'hereby certify that ~ copies of the above document were posted by me in __:_J__ conspicuous places or nearby the descnbed property OQ. "''""'1111 DATE:_yp/" I,,, I l..oo 7 SIGNED: ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing c'.5>.JJIJ.Oc"-'tlo."'f'"o"---' on the · ~,"'.,t-!N Hr~t111 .... )% ~ I. 'lf~o, Alt 7_.·· ~~~ , ?O -·-J \ ~!<'· ,".~ .1tl r., 'Ii;,.;";,;"'::~~ 111 OF WP.."':_.::> 1\1111\\\\'-'" • - CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 5th day of September, 2007, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter, NOA, DOT Notification and Environmental Checklist documents. This information was sent to: .. ,,·c, -,_' . ,• .. >:ii '1'/'.il p11i:r<< ---· . Name,:·.:., .. >·:' "" ,.::: •::n:: , ... Reprei;enth·1g .· . · • '\ · Agencies See Attached Bob I Patrick Dye Contact I Owner John Lefotu & Ramin Pazooki DOT Surrounding Property Owners See Attached ,,-l----. __ ' . I --. (Signature of Sender:_1.:,_: ""'~::::::iiZ:::;fa:':::.'2,&,,.~:...c<,:_/__:=.----===----------- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Patrick Roduin signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ~-::-;;'{yt~111,_11 .:;:-;,,,·· ., .. ~u,!;lii,+,",,. £ ., '.<.·.. ~,:,~··]:.· .... ,..t,."(l -.·'."i/ .... Dated: q /1,, /07 template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology ' Environmental Review Section PO Box47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Stewart Reinbold ' Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 3190 1601h Ave SE 39015 -172'' Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092 ' WSDOT Northwest Region' Duwamish Tribal Office' Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program • Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172'' Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers • KC Wastewater Treatment Division • Office of Archaeology & Historic Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer PO Box C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box48343 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olvmoia, WA 98504-8343 Boyd Powers ' Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72'' Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities State Department of Ecology Real Estate Services NW Regional Office Title Examiner 3190 1601h Avenue SE 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. • template -affidavit of service by mailing ' BURLINGTON NORTHRN SANTA FE ATTN: PROP TAX PO BOX 96189 FORT WORTH TX 76161 DYE PATRICK 7029 RIPLEY LN N RENTON WA 98056 GRUNDHAUS MARJORIE K 7001 RIPLEY LN N RENTON WA 98056 IOPPOLO JOSEPH A 5201 RIPLEY LN N RENTON WA 98056 PIANTANIDA GREG+SHERRE 7011 RIPLEY LANR N RENTON WA 98056 DANA DONALD & PATRICIA A 5219 RIPLEY LN N RENTON WA 98056 FLYNN MATTHEW P 5301 RIPLEY LN N RENTON WA 98056 GRUNDHAUS MARJORIE K 7001 RIPLEY LN N RENTON WA 98056 LANG SUSANE 7023 RIPLEY LN N RENTON WA 98056 DANA DONALD C 5219 RIPLEY LN N RENTON WA 98056 GARDNER MARK K +CHRISTIE SM 6841 RIPLEY LN N RENTON WA 98056 HUSE JAMES D+CYNTHIA A 5227 RIPLEY LN N RENTON WA 98056 MANZOLAFP 7009 RIPLEY LN RENTON WA 98055 CITY ~F RENTON ~~~ + + + Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department ~ ~ 2': Kathy Keolker, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P,E., Administrator ~N'fO;,,----------------------- September 5, 2007 Attn: John Lefotu and Ramin Pazooki Washington State Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 SUBJECT: Dye Parking Pad LUA07-094, SME, V-A, ECF Dear Sirs: Enclosed is a copy of the TIA for the subject land use application along with a copy of the proposed site plan. If you have additional comments or concerns, you may either send them via mail or email them to me at ehiggins@ci.renton.wa.us The Environmental Review Committee is scheduled for September 24, 2007. I would appreciate your comments prior to the meeting, preferably by September 19, 2007, if possible to incorporate any comments into the staff report. Sincerely, 13*~~-<ff_J~ Elizabeth Higgins, AlCP Senior Planner cc: Project File Kayren Kittrick, City of Renton -Plan Review ---!ft'I.'l!l,B+.i.~isim,u.'"'·'.\l'cllkc"';~""l~,o,~.es~n,:B<u~,,.,&&[,p1~..,,~,;,i~~,g~\PcPll<~~BJJll,~.;:~Ti:!e~;i.,: 0 i+-7 0 .GJ:9,4~,J;-:.'"li~aia:l,@~gtll!lil'\s: 0 >GG~~-"~~"''~'°'';'°d"'oc>-------~- @ This paper contains 50%recycled m~terial, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CUR 0 VE PROPERTY OWNER($) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: ·o 1)/ le lo,.tv,'c\c ADDRESS: ( Q ~ '1 Ri'p\~;} L.-, iJ CITY: R.{vJr-o~ ZIP: \,..) A- PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: f~cA D V£ pc,, V' ~) '11 ',-- V PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: '7 ll 11 "I f!., 'f I { 't L11 tJ ~o1. wit "l~>b TELEPHONE NUMBER, '-{ ~s J"I J. , o?.. o LI di\ .\ -a7 l( 7 l(( APPLICANT (if other than owner) KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 3 3~JJO-~l?D -ol NAME: EXISTING LAND USE(S): i<ock S'\vfL COMPANY (ii applicable): PROPOSED LAND USE(S): (fl"*'-1/i f /-,-.uJ:, """' ...J ,~~--, I'. I I~ o .... J.--,1,i_. ,;,,( C l u ADDRESS: EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: i? 5F' CITY: ZIP: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): TELEPHONE NUMBER EXISTING ZONING: g.7 CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): ~ NAME: 1? 01 1)"10 , SITE AREA (in square feet): 5i'1Df+~ SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (if applicable): DEDICATED: ADDRESS: 1 o J "\ a,~ l.tu LV\ ;J SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: ((QJo" ZIP:qfOJ~l ACRE (if applicable): NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: ~ 'f;i,-a,r-, ~7'f7 )'\~ .. :10,D<ea"' QO, <~Y ~ C[.,!f )'l;/ Io~ () J,.,1~, (,) co,v,c'>.f+ .nt ~ NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): , , Q: web/pw/devscrv/forms/p lanoing/masterapp.doc 07/29/05 PR __ ECT INFORMATION (contin __ d) ,--~----~---------~ PROJECT VALUE: ~ j()1 (J1J"O M ~ ks-J NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): ff SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): rf IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): . D AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE D AQUIFER PROTECT/ON AREA TWO D FLOOD HAZARD AREA D GEOLOGIC HAZARD D HABITAT CONSERVATION o SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES o WETLANDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information Included) SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION_, TOWNSHIP_, RANGE_, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: . ~~:t;""" ' 3. Se.--ti? ,4 v C\..rt ,LJ') c..e 1. ,Sho.-e,knf< ~1,1'9~,Q, J ::P<ooo 1-\-, 2. Cn/iu I AYl?ffi 'itlf I .i fl(' e Mc~ 4. £ov'1 ('"l)y)(Y')cn"t,,\.\ +2<>.11ew Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP '· (Print Namels) r ,,,,J'; ( \:: 1)'7 e__ ' declare I/lat I am (please check one) X Iha currant owner of the property involved in this application or __ U,e authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. (Signature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of Owner/Representative) Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/planning/masterapp.doc I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence lhaffi '-\: ,-\ c._ \c-.. J;:i 'f E' signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned In the instrument. Notary (Print) Arr,ner L 'f V'\(\ My appointment expires: d -l':\ -'t;() 2 07/29105 Master Application Form, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVE: .. OF SUBMITTAL REQUII .-MENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS M9Qfilm¥n1:1,ri~Rl!!lrroqutloo~n11i! 1 Neighborhood Detail Map 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section PROJECT NAME: -'-"'})"1-yel,,,--C-fa_ti,r,..,_.,fe--=-t 1¥/:...::.. ~Pt;:.c,tid'-'---- J>/2. ~fa-t: tJC'efCLOf'l>UcNT PLAN~IING 3. Building Section DATE: 4. Development Planning Section Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\waiverofsubmittalreqs_9-06.xls c:TY OF H[NTOh AUG 2 2 2007 RECEIVED 09/06 DEVELOPMENT SERVICl:S DIVISION WAIVE~F SUBMITTAL REQUIR ____ ENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS ]1!1r:;::';i11r~!~!:r£11:~:~:1:~r1i111!1i1':11;i !;!!~~~~::! 11~sll':l!:1! Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis• w1tfqJffil!!~a;i~~rmll&J*'11:;1ir:,rn1 ii111;:11 i 11111111111 1 Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2 AND 3 Photosimulations 2 AND 3 This requirement may be waivEid by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section PRoJEcTNAME: Dye far/:1n1 J>,::;.of DATE: t/$fal: Q:\WEB\PW\OEVSERV\Forms\Planning\waiverofsubmittalreqs_9·06.xls 09106 ., .... ~""'~ ..• _ -'•\ ' ,·',. _/' ------, ___ \ J ~ I' / • / I'-/,~ f4? \_." l 1· !i i + ' _\ ~ /- \,;;~/ • /,_--:-Kathy Kcolker, Mayor Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator ,~-- August 22, 2007 Patrick Dye 7029 Ripley Lane N Renton, WA 98056 Subject: Request for Parking Modification for Residential Parking Space 7029 Ripley Lane North Dear Mr. Dye: This letter is sent to advise you that the Development Services Division Director has reviewed and denied a parking code modification for your residence. This letter will supercede the letter sent on August 20, 2007. Due to filling, for the creation of an additional parking space, within 200 feet of a shoreline of statewide significance and within a critical area (protected slope) the land use permits below are required before the modification request can be considered. I have enclosed the Director's denial with this letter. Below are the city permits, licenses and approvals needed for your proposal. There may be other State and Federal Permits needed for your proposed project please contact the appropriate agencies: Permits, Licenses and Approvals Required: You will need to obtain the following City approvals ( applications attached) prior to performing work at the site. l. Environmental Review (application enclosed) 2. Setback Variance (application enclosed) 3. Shoreline Exemption Permit (application enclosed) 4. Critical Area Modification (application enclosed) The afplication should be submitted to the Building Department at the front counter on the 61 floor of City Hall between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM. Applicants are encouraged to bring in one copy of the application package for informal review by staff, prior to making the requested number of copies, colored drawings or photo reductions. Please allow approximately 45 minutes for application screening. Please feel free to contact me at 425-430-7289 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ........d'..,..., ~~ -I C ·c:: .. -~ .. .-- Rocale Timmons Assistant Planner ---------,, ----------. -----·-··· . ·-··-·-··" 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98057 ·1{ r NT ·r () N~- -;1,_.,I l . '--l: ' ' 1<\ I Owner: Patrick Oye, with power of attorney with Robert Dye Address: 7029 Ripley Lane North, Renton, Wa 98056 Parcel Number: 334330-2780-06 l\llG 2 2 2007 ,::F" .Y'i-(\,f!: n. i""}~"t,,:\:~ 'I t-l} Project Description: To construct a parking pad/ driveway and a retaining wall to avoid parking along the small lane and obstructing street traffic. Legal Description: Northerly 16.8 feet of Lot 29 and all of Lot 28, Block "C", C.D. Hillmans Lake Washington, Garden of Eden Addition, to Seattle, Division Number 3 Lot size: 3990 square feet Footprint Size of constructed buildings: 1330 square feet Project: DYE PARKING PAD, 7029 Ripley Ln N, Renton 98056, 425 227 4747, 425 392 1020 Project Narrative: Purpose: To construct a parking pad/ driveway on the property line, and to build a retaining wall around 9 feet high in order to avoid parking along the small lane and obstructing street traffic. Background: Ripley Lane is a small one way lane serving houses on Lake Washington between the Railroad tracks and the water. Most properties are quite small (4-5000 sq. feet lots), and as a result parking cars is a problem and space is limited. I wish to construct a retaining wall around 9 feet high in order to build a driveway/parking pad on top of it. My neighbor already has his garage near the property line as it was built so+ years ago and this area of my property adjacent to the neighbour's garage is currently useless. From the street side, there is an existing 8 Y, foot retaining wall and then landscaping in front of it, and at the end of the 20 foot long parking pad, it would be about 9 Y, foot high thus the gradient over 20 horizontal feet is about 1 vertical foot. My mother requires wheelchair access to the house entrance, and the current parking area is too small to reasonably accommodate wheelchair access to the front door. I remodeled the kitchen and entrance to the house (interior) in 2005 to make it wheelchair accessible, and now the parking area in front of the entrance is not large enough for reasonable wheelchair access thus I propose this parking pad to make it accessible for my mother and father who currently reside at my house. t>.l.lG 2 'I. 2QG7 RE.C£\\JEO Project: DYE PARKING PAD, 7029 Ripley Ln N, Renton 98056, 425 227 4747, 425 392 1020 Setback Variance Justification: Suffers undue hardship ... : Ripley Lane is a one way, small lane with limited parking anywhere. Most homes on the lane have already made site improvements to their property and added additional parking areas, including building retaining walls and adding fill. The sizes of properties are small (my property is 3990 sq. ft), and my neighbour's properties are similar size. The topography of the area which is a near vertical drop from the street to the property requires me to build 2 retaining walls and fill in a space before it is possible to create a parking space. This space is needed because my parents live in the house, and my mother is handicapped and requires wheelchair access to/from the car and house. If there were cheaper and more reasonable solutions for parking I would surely pursue them, but due to Burlington Northern Railroad refusals to lease land to adjacent landowners and their prohibition of moving any dirt on their land to create parking forces the adjacent homes to solve their own parking problems which is what I am trying to do with the creation of this parking pad. Most of my neighbours have sufficient parking, including many who have built on the property line. Unfortunately the previous owners of my house did not have the foresight to have built better parking for the house as other neighbours on this lane have done 20 years ago. I just wish to have what my neighbours already have. Granting of variance not materially detrimental to the public, etc: As most of my neighbours already enjoy parking similar to my proposal, there is no detrimental effect to the neighbourhood. Rather the contrary, if each neighbor can better take care of their own parking needs, then it will decrease potential conflicts within the neighbourhood. Approval shall not grant a special privilege ... : ., . As stated above, most of my neighbours already enjoy better parking facilities than my property. They just did it 20 years or more ago, or without a permit. I should not be penalized for following the regulations/ laws. The approval is the minimum variance that shall accomplish the purpose ... : This proposal is the simplest most effective solution to my parking woes. It will also enable my mother to have reasonable wheelchair access to/from the car and house. Project: DYE PARKING PAD, 7029 Ripley Ln N, Renton 98056, 425 227 4747, 425 392 1020 Critical Areas~ N\~ t~ '-~\;::/\ Granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to public welfare ... : A.U1, i 2 2~07 a,. ,..;~•··•11-.... nr.:vr.:iv~u Ripley Lane is a one way, small lane with limited parking anywhere. Most homes on the lane have already made site improvements to their property and added additional parking areas, including building retaining walls and adding fill. The sizes of properties are small (my property is 3990 sq. ft), and my neighbour's properties are similar size. The topography of the area which is a near vertical drop from the street to the property requires me to build 2 retaining walls and fill in a space before it is possible to create a parking space. This space is needed because my parents live in the house, and my mother is handicapped and requires wheelchair access to/from the car and house. If there were cheaper and more reasonable solutions for parking I would surely pursue them, but due to Burlington Northern Railroad refusals to lease land to adjacent landowners and their prohibition of moving any dirt on their land to create parking forces the adjacent homes to solve their own parking problems which is what I am trying to do with the creation of this parking pad. Most of my neighbours have sufficient parking, including many who have built on the property line. Unfortunately the previous owners of my house did not have the foresight to have built better parking for the house as other neighbours on this lane have done 20 years ago. I just wish to have what my neighbours already have. As most of my neighbours already enjoy parking similar to my proposal, there is no detrimental effect to the neighbourhood. Rather the contrary, if each neighbor can better take care of their own parking needs, then it will decrease potential conflicts within the neighbourhood. No reasonable use of the property left if requested variance is not granted ... : This area of my property is currently wasted space. It is already 70% filled with old concrete and dirt. Building a proper retaining wall, and using proper fill material as noted in the Geo Tech report (which shall be fo))pwed and recommendations adhered to) would be a significant improvement to the property and neighbourhood. Variance granted is the minimum amount necessary ... : This is the simplest and most effective solution to my parking woes that I can think of. Without a variance, my mother cannot reasonably access the car and house as the current parking space is too small for reasonable wheelchair access. Need for variance is not the result of actions of the property owner. .. : True. I am trying to find a solution to 1": my mother's wheelchair access requirements, and 2°•: I am requesting this variance prior to doing any works. Proposed variance is based on consideration of best available science ... : I have gone above and beyond by spending nearly $7000 to date on the geotech and engineering reports for a project that has a value of around $10,000. The engineers, both structural and geological, have written their reports and considered my project a feasible and reasonable solution for my parking problems. I hope the city and county concur. Project: DYE PARKING PAD, 7029 Ripley Ln N, Renton 98056, 425 227 4747/4'!!539) 1020 Drainage Control Plan The recommendations in the Geo Tech report shall be followed and implemented. Such recommendations include provision of a drain at the footing elevation that consists of PVC pipe surrounded by washed pea gravel. The perforations in the pipe shall be set down at the bottom of the footing and the drains shall be constructed with sufficient gradient to allow gravity discharge away from the wall. Final drainage shall be tied in to the existing gutter drain system which prevents the water from going in to Lake Washington. See geotech report for more details. - ~ ~ < ~ G' I ~ & \' -r) ~ .Is,. ~ 0 y ~ ~<:;: _:, r-r6 r j ;,= <:t:' ::r 0 - ,'?-" 3 i c--is c;£ CT5 a ~ ( w ~4 C6 M ,_ J--\.,-.. \._.., ~ [-), 0 .., Cl$ OS- Jc{ -s J <S' ".,.. 0 <;" 1? ,o -f:-.; ',. '-' ~ ~ s v V\ V, C '> ~ v \'IS" f [ = \ 0 Project: DYE PARKING PAD, 7029 Ripley Ln N, Renton 98056, 425 227 4747, 425 392 1020 Construction Mitigation Description: Use of small trucks and equipment are required in this area due to limited space to move, and as a result this project will be more labour intensive and therefore less obtrusive to neighbours. Small trucks and equipment will be kept clear of the street, and the work will be done during normal working hours thus most of my neighbours will have already left for work and problems should be minimized. Please see also the Geo Tech. Report for further details and recommendations which shall be followed. ·•EVELOPMENT PLANNING ~ -CITY OF RENl o;-1 AUG 2 2 2007 RECEIVED CJR Engineering GJ Civil -Structural Engineering· Comprehensive Project Management il ~ Project: r cJ c J Ripley Ln Renton, WA 98056 Prepared for: Bob Dye . Parcel Number: ; 334330-2780-06 Lot Size: 3990 sq. ft PROPERTY U!Ct$ EXTENO ~ MEDIAN WJ.lE~ U~E I-- -"'~'"-,..-' . "o ' .. ' ~ ;, ~ ~ '"!.,_ ·~ ' ~~-~PR~~-,L-~+-~ / Footprint size of Constructed Bldgs: 1330 sq. ft. ' -12 feet s·-,·· 6'-2" 2i·-10· 24'-2i" w~,,l· 1 :r-0·1 :.4·-,{· 3·-1~- -__ , -----t-,---, 'o ' . " !I JI i . ~ - 0 ' 21'-2" w-11i· II \ -9 Y, feet ,· 8 V. feet ii Project Description: To construct a parking pad and Retaining wall to avoid parking Along small lane and obstructin1 Traffic and to enable wheelchai1 Access to the entrance Legal Description: Northerly 16.8 ft of Lot 29 and All of Lot 28, Block "C", C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Ad·"· To Seattle, Division Number 3 Proposed Driveway \ ! North 0fVfLOP~-1Ef\ff .PLAl\'i'!it-:--~ crrr OF r~ct,:':"c::-; SITE PL~~UG 2 2 2001 " LU SCALE: 1 R-rc,-,, t'<'s. =•\. ~-,,, . ,'I''·.::~," " / SE 64th St. a., I \ ~i \ co ! l ~J I \_ ; ' S:1~ i \ a ,z.~a...\r-· --4···'.~,~ '\""'··---~ \· ·. \ 'r,i) '· / / R-8 f //,_ _ _, !/ / CA CA . SE 65th SL ..---; . SE SE 72nd St. ' SE . 177th Pl. SE 80th St. C4 • 32 T24N R5E E 1/2 AUG2220 0 ·s· ... RE' CJ. \K,: o ZONING P/BIPW TBCBNICAL SBJl.VICBS OZ/28/0'I -------Renton City Limita 1:"800 DT 29 T24N R5E E 1/2 S.Z9 zr\NING MAP· soc·~ 74 92 . 93 455 f 456 459 ( .461 81 82 83 J3k. a5-j s"s--a1- 25 T24f>! R4E-.30 T24N~.~5E i'ivT2~~ A] i8·J:24NHSE 27t24N AS~ 2s T24N I sE · 26 T24N R4E 455W 81 ' 94w< . '"· 458 _4§::U ·c1 C2 36 T24N R4E 31 T24N ASE •.008 309 D3 \\04 ~~~3N'Fl'5E 4 T23N f!SE"' 8. J .· ·•··.• 8~1 . ·.•···•.n.~-._1_. · .. D·7 .. . . --1.10~~ -. 3 T~;N Rs~·:(:~ 2 ;23N-·RsE .: .369 3 .E4. ES 370 . .. 81f ·.· --13n:1 • F5 -~ffei-' .. ~ .. 16 r23N)isE; l4 T23N'A5£. 334• \;335 371 816 ' G1 .cs2 G3. 3 T23N R:.te-•-• a 2.4 .T23tiJ R4E 19 T23N Fl$E .44 34 600 602 $;.~./ .• ·.HI:,· 1 2· ,;' • ! •.,, ... I I. ' 2s,f23~ R4E -H3 1-l§ 28-Tf3N ASE 60!5 825 .{l<lfi;·. ,_-\-~·· ,." J6 ·, ',\:Cf?''- 36 T23N R4E" ·.34 T23N Fl.SE 35 T23N R5E 607 608 \ . 609 610 632 833 J2 J 3c-; -J4~,= -35 J6 J7 i T22N'R4E 6 T22N Fa5Ei · RES1PENJ1AI ~ Re.sour~ Conservation ~ ReBldentiRl 1 du/ac ~ Residential 4 du/ac ~ Residential 6 du/ac ~ Residential Manuractured Homes j R-10 ! Residential 10 du/ac I R-14 i Residential 14 du/ac I RM-Fl Residential Multi-Family jRM-T I Residential Multi-Family Traditio11al 5-f22N R5E 3 T22N ASE 2 T22N R?E MIXED USE CENTER ~ Center Village luc-N1I Urban Center -North 1 [~ Urban Center -North 2 0 Center Do,mlown• ~ Commercial/Office/Re11idential COMMERCTAt ~ Commercial Arterial• 0 Commercie.l Office• 0 Commercie.l Nei,cbborbood INDUSTRIAL ~ Industrial -Heavy 0 Industrial -Medium 0 lnduatrial -Light (P) Publicly owned -----Renton City Limit!! --·-Adjacent City Limits -Book Pages Boundary KROLL PAGE E 8 u 3€ .. a ,~ 1T2 j RM-U I Residential Multi-Family Urban Center• • May include overlay Distri~t.!I. See Appendix maps. For additio11al regu.Iatione ID Overlay Districts, please eee RMC (-3. PAGE# INDEX SECT/TOWN/RANGE Printed by Print & Mall Services, City of Renton .... DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIS: :NTPLA N\NG . ! City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: Cl\'( .. !T AUG 2 2 2007 RECElVEO The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be .done} and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: , This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. ,;Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. , . You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write , "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline,. and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D}. For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs}, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site• should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. Q:\WEBIPWIDEVSERV\Fonns\Planning\envchlst.doc08/29/03 A. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 9. 10. 11. BACKGROUND Name of applicant: 7 o,. f ~ tc. ~ l), IL Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 7 O~"I (,', ''i l.... }.) f...Jro'! ' t.J Ir ., yo ) " '{ ~r .il -:I 1 '17 4.1 , '{,Ir 3 "'I?. I o?-0 Date checklist prepared: """}W t ~ I ')..007 Agency requesting checklist: c: ~ J1i ~ ..J-o"' Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): F.JJ. J.001 Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. I\.) 0 L!st any environme~tal information you know about that ha,s been prepared, or will _be !)tepared, directly related to this proposal. L?tc !(~I., {}._(•" t lf.,r", lo, ~l-{. (ii, 11,,;, f nJt.<-l Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Nu List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\envchlst.doc 2 ... ' . 12. 8. 1. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. I\;-; o~v" iJ. 'f lb f vo f (, Pa 1 h, l"" h "!f ~ 1.1: \ J ..,_ f o,J,. 1\, y f "1 IA Ill\ The. P'°f~ !,.,,,._, .~ t \wJJ'I\!,--j' r...:.1-,,,>t ,\.1a ...,4 ( a ~). ""'7o'o"' (l...1 11 1 41 Al (J t~11 W /} "lf(l.fti ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS EARTH a. b. C. General description of the site (circle one);~rolling, hilly, steep slopes, m?~ntainous, + other .. I( Lot ,:, f,..,.,, J :u:t tu w"-*1,;.1£-Y";"...JJ,, fl~ 0«~ j I d·.,t<-h,'.,l,.. vJ~ fi.,-u ;f ~ J~( yi~J.,._ -1-o hv rfv'a:f. fluw~ ,, "'A°"f/'Jt.,j-~ \ J tvi, ...i { \, ,rft M.tvCf". (v(-/v~" < .._ -fr, l.io1¥< -(.o,., > -}y ,J--;, o"' / tr flau r. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) . L. o.,1rr...h,A.o.__, ""-'-11,,_ L{o'% _.. .r1oi~ hr < 5"% ,!'b,...., RVO\f"""'?' °\ c;% ~"""'11 l" f'"f~'i 'J <( yO(. f\df-L What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peal, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. r ~ s ,' l \-a --'O\ fl " d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. N 0 e. f. g. h. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source offill. ,oz of 11,,·s fl Vt., ,', ..k.t.ta-A' 11 r J ,,,_ , ;:r; ,.,,'., I., -/,, ,,~,f,,,.. c:r ?,_.,.)).., F,'/J if-,',,. t.,,J-i.-~ fo ,'t'-"111~-<.. c>\c (o.r c""' P,.•l<,"J· fnl,.,~[.,j__-ol. J..~""'t tr~, 1:-s wo • .J) i., f~ff,·t•'t..:1-. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally . f- describe. \-1 tv ... ~\c.; s\., •• J.J ,io+ ("Wt~ ~iro,lDV\. I),.~ '':"'.J.l f"'J ft . , s,_..;.,_ 11 ("'jat ,--, hio r""l& to c,,,_..,,,.._ ~ d;·v nj"l· 'R<~.,.J,-'-v0 n a"l About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? ~3>~ Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: . ,~ 5e.of,e,\.. ,..--<.fort. j~ 'b frO/vT IJ {t"'o f'.M~ ( \ !Si) f~~) Q:\WEBIPW\DEVSERV\Fonns\Planning\envchlst.doc 3 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is compleied? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. N 8 "'-'f\'\ .j-:c: c"., fii r J. 1, , b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. r"f t-J 6V\~ r,,..:1-:t: "'""' ,,,w .. o . 0 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: ) Q t}-4 O f-<.<-.k , .( f O ;:t, 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type . ., and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river It flows into. \1'•"'1~ iJ oo L..h Wou"1•A)' t,,., ( ..i..:;l-v -F,-• ._;fl. N9 ,1\v.,, "',.,,. J ii f "°(~ \,,. ~v~ ,,; ,J:;;,, ~ r' "' f • 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described .. y waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 1 _ l. :-,<, f1 '1 1 y,s. Co~s t-v,,~t' 1.. ... .:t..tar'r.~ ..,.JJ., ,.l,o...k-"\' \,,,'7 I,,. 0,11 Jrr~f, -o •"' '- "'1 ~ f,' I \ / /\ ,,)'fl.\ I -'J-d,"' ""f -t,;.c. ICJ fo C ",..:t " \ ( r,.,,r f ,.,J,u \\ ~ NV-"'-. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source offill material. ,,,, r,,,,,,.)::;,,r r,J f:,..,, 1 • rJ.. Vt J • .t . \ -?. l"""f-lv~c\c..t, ~°""' 'D "1 ..J..., 1-,roJ,11J.,._ l:':\t>~ If' worl"-,'a ...,41,..,,Js tJI' vJ.J;:iil ~ r/J ~0 """'-"--0 J 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. l\l• 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. t,.Jo Q:\WEBIPW\DEVSERV\Fonns\Planning\envchlst.doc 4 b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. l"u 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. c. Water Runoff (including storm. water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe .. 4 J ,,.\-( J. ,n G, •itc. L.. 14 f"t, ., J._,-._;.., ..,t, f\.u. 0,• ti~"~ J_,.,.Jr,">"' Co,ii;,h-.,o 11, f\J<'. ti'f< 5,,.,~,o,~J.,.J l,cl' ...,~,"'-..J f~'I ,-,~~iJ. w.,Jw, .loo ~,-+-f\ • ., +o t,.., 1.-oJ..t.. Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. ~ 1"\ Tl,.i f,'11 ..,,,t,,.,,.J w.'11 1,-,. \o«<:ttJ ~-t~'"lt ~ r<.},.,\,,,,O' .,.,4 ,, ...,, 2) c -1. W'l....;r. 11-1 , , "'I.J-t .. ....( .,!,i .,, , , I \ "1. r .., ..vh,, rw, 1.Jc.. . d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: __ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other __ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs ~ grass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? L)l•'rl>•;. ,•, c,..,uJ'-..-otlr~ 1 'Ir v .. ~;v,, f.'11 / I'l"'J c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. , d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: l t r .s "' J•r\c,'1-10 ,v..J-A., ., 0 I/{' J-.J,'o,.,. Q:\WEBIPW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\envchlst.doc 5 .-~- 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: No.v.. Q.. pOvJ.u~ w;.. o~ ,.,J. · r...<,....., ,...,,,..,,h Lk. w....l.. Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other ___ g'.,,_ ____ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other __ "f:l~------- Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other --'1:f--~-- b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. IV ON o nu., j\-\.," ,..f ..,...., .~ [.. Ir. w.....t., · \, ..f "a t ,d-,,.._ "1../-lv1 t/'Vl>f y/ f'L. . c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain rv 1) d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: -- 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a . What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether It will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.~+ r-r-,) / /t b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. {'J 0 c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: rJ { A- 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. 1) 2) Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. N 0 Describe special emergency services that might be required. f,J O ""- Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N (fr, S «.. 5.e• \-(J.-. l"t!0 ,t ..a e>t ffl,J,{,__ Q:\WEBIPW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\envchlst.doc 6 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? rJ O v01... 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate wha! hour~ noise would come from the site. n 1 • 1 _ ,fz p..;,)t(~ u I -cl ...i.tt.k.,o WdrJc ~"'__,v,,. .,,,.,,.,,,.;. \,:>IA!,,wu, ~fi)'<IIJ, I V , • /7,t c..+ f"1.J.t t,,.dcJ "It "ii"',"f~ tu ~-" v,,J f1','<J ,-JO v70•H I ,...,I· · 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: -vs, 1 rvvi.Jl Jv .. c.lc1 /"-7.,,:/vvtR.;;t 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? ~..-\vJt \.iom.t_ (!) b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. \ ~o•S"-- d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? tJo e. Whal is the current zoning classification of the site? fz.-~ f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the stte? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. rJ O i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? I f., ""; \ <S Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Fonns\Planning\envchlst.doc 7 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? (if k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: r-1\ A- I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 9. HOUSING 10. a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether. high, middle, or low-income housing. rJfA C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. + .L, +-/ (} l.s•i'1\J-;; (Dr C<>J fdc,},<f, ,·1.-,utf ,r.wl {v'..v( b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? fZ5 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: /J / It 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would tt mainly occur? I +-: J ( 0'1 (. .. ;:ti_ , ; ~ VV\J. N f !-r 4 b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? rJo Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\envchlst.doc 8 c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? No,l\,L d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. b. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. f, /2_; I {._ l<:1\•<') L1 · tt ,'f" f"'"'"cl' /"'J. p'1"-''-"b' iv 'f ~o ""1.-<... b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not; what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? rJ" c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 3 _ 1-\ , f'" c t.O Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Fonns\Planning\envchlst.doc 9 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? ['J 0 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. ~ 0 f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. rJ ( 4 g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. I\) " b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. rJ I A- 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities curre telepho , available at the site:~ n~~ re~serv~ er, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the ulil~ providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. 0 C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may witlidraw any declaration of non-significance that It might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part Proponent: Name Printed: '\)..._ tv,'c r t)'J .e., Date: '.J,. ~ ~ J ""'-1 'Ji. (JO 7 Q:\ WEB\PW\DEVSER V\Fonns\Planning\envchlst.doc 10 CJR Engineer,ng Civil -Structural Engineering Comprehensive Project Management 3814 231•1 Avenue SE Phone: (425) 269-5204 Sammamish, WA 98075-9212 Fax: (425) 671-0003 JOB NO. 018029 RETAINING WALL ADDITIONAL PARKING AREA BOB DYE'S RESIDENCE PREPARED FOR: BOB DYE 7029 RIPLEY LANE NORTI-1 RENTON, WA 98056 MARCH 17, 2007 EXPIRES 6/28/ 0 -\-- © Copyright 2007 by CJR Engineering The Professional Engineer's seal shall appear in red ink. Otherwise, this document has been unlawfully reproduced. L ,JO L DlHS ~1; ~' iii a " :r ~ ~ ~1 ~,,;~o:! c,;o, o~~,,r.! )1'/'I,\ ~,~1YJ.3d ' . rn ,,, i,• ' ! ,I " ll " ,· 8~ J I -'-" l~i L\' ~ i ~11 1· ,, ; ! ! i ' ' ---+- ' i I EXISTING CONCRETE WALL CONCRETE FOOTING 4-#5 BARS CONT. #5 BARS@ 12" o.c. 16 11 3' 10' VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT l #5 BAR EVERY OTHER CELL ALL CELLS GROUTED SOLID CJR Engineering Prepared for Date: 03/17/07 Job No. 018029 Bob Dye Retaining Walls ~Qil Pmpertln Unit Egui)l:alent Elylg Pressum Special Weight Active At Rest Passive Inspection (PCF) (PCF) (PCF) (PCF) 130 40 60 300 No !tM!.! E!£2R!!!liU F'm Em Fb Fa Es n (psi) (psi) (psi) (psi) 1,500 1350000 250 181 2.90E+07 2.15E+01 Dlm!!!!§IOn!! geometcic P[Qll!ct!Y b t Height A s I r H H/r (in) (in) (ft) (in'2) (in'3) (in'4) (in) 12 15.625 10 187.5 488.2813 3814.697 4.510549 120 26.6043 Other Loj!fi!s Point Loao 1mpj!c:t Total p Factor Load Load (K) (K) (Kl 2 0 0 2 Ms p M =Ms+ P*e Pe e 0.25*Pe (ft-K) (Kl (in-K) (Kl (In) (Kl 3.85 2 46.19 3,530 0 882 d Bar As/bar As rho k j (in) (in'2) (in'2) (in'2) 11.8125 5 0.31 0.46 0.003247 0.31 0.90 fa fa/Fa fb fb/Fb fa/F a+fb/Ft fa Fs fs/Fs (psi) 10.67 0.06 198.37 0.79 0.85 9,476 24,000 0.39 CJR Engineering Prepared for Date: 03/17/07 Job No. 018029 Bob Dye Retaining Walls Retaining Wall Design GOVERNING CODE: IBC-2003 Wall geometrics Stem Base Key Height Thickness d Width Depth Heel Width Depth dist. from (ft) (In) (in) (ft) (In) (ft) (ft) (ft) Heel (ft) 10.00 7.63 6.56 3.00 8.00 2.36 8.00 1.00 Stem Floor Slab Cover on Height Thickness Length Heigth Toe {ft) (in) (ft) (In) (ft) 10.00 4.00 7.00 10.00 Material Weights Soll Pressure Friction Concrete Steel Concrete Soil Active At Rest Dynamic Passive Factor F'c Fy (pcf) (pcf) (pcf) (pcf) (Seismic) (pcf) (psi) I psi I 150 00 120.00 35.00 60.00 57.60 30000 0.4 2,500 60,000 Stem Wall Weight Soil Weight Total Height Stem Base Key Soil/Heel Soil/Toe Weight (ft) ( #} 10.00 953.13 300.00 1,200.00 2,837.50 5,291 Stem Lever Arm Height Stem Base Key Soil/Heel Soll/Toe (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 10.00 0.32 1.50 (1.00) 1.82 (0.00) Stem Resisting Moment Floor Restraints Height Stem Base Key Soil Passive Bottom Top Total M (ft) ( #') ( #') ( #') ( #') { #') ( #') ( #') 10.00 302.8 450.0 (1,200.0) 5,158 15 0 16,000 20,725 Page3 c~ Engineering Prepared for Date: 03/17 /07 Job No. 018029 Bob Dye Retaining Walls Stem Active Force Resisting Force Height Sliding O.T.M. Friction Passive Key Slab Passive Top Total (ft) ( #) ( #') ( #) ( #) ( # ) ( #) EndSlab ( #) 10.00 3,413.3 12,136.3 2,116.3 66.7 3,350.0 1,500.0 7,032.9 Stem Safety Factors Net X e e/B Height Sliding O.T.M. Moment (ft) (ft) (ft) 10.00 2.06 1.71 8,589 1.62 (0.12) (0.04) Page4 i ; i ' I . ' I ' I .. r, I • ! ' . ' .. 1 March 13, 2007 Project No. KE070035A Mr. Robert Dye 7029 Ripley Lane North Renton, Washington 98056 ociated Earth Sciencer y nc. -~~~~ Cefeb.afirJJ 231Joors o/S'ervice Subject: Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Engineering Report Dye Residence 7029 Ripley Lane North Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Dye: We are pleased to present the enclosed copies of the above-referenced report. This report summarizes the results of our subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering study and offers recommendations for the design and development of the proposed project. We have enjoyed working with you on this study and are confident that the recommendations presented in this report will aid in the successful completion of your project. If you should have any questions or if we can be of additional help to you, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Kirkland, Washington Jo JNS/dr KE0700J5AI J Projecs \20070035\K E\ WP Kirkland Office• 911 Fifth Avenue, Suite 100 • Kirkland, WA 98033 •PI (425) 827-7701 •FI (425) 827-5424 Everett Office• 2911 112 Hewitt Avenue, Suite.2 • Everett, WA 98201 •PI (425) 259-0522 •FI (425) 252-3408 www.aesgeo.oom '. ' . I , I , ' ' ' SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT DYE RESIDENCE Renton, Washington Prepared for: Mr. Robert Dye 7029 Ripley Lane North Renton, Washington 98056 Prepared by: Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. 911 5'h Avenue, Suite 100 Kirkland, Washington 98033 425-827-7701 Fax: 425-827-5424 March 13, 2007 Project No. KE070035A r. i J ·_ i ' . ' Dye Residence Renton, Washington 1.0 INTRODUCTION Subsuiface Exploration and Geotechnical Engineering Report Project and Site Conditions I. PROJECT AND SITE CONDITIONS This report presents the results of Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. 's (AESI's) subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering study for the proposed Dye residence project located at 7029 Ripley Lane North in Renton, Washington (Figure 1). The proposed building location and approximate locations of the explorations accomplished for this study are presented on the "Site Sketch," Figure 2. If any changes in the nature, design, or location of the structure are planned, the conclusions and recommendations in this report should be reviewed and modified, or verified. 1.1 Purpose and Scope The purpose of this study was to provide subsurface data and design recommendations for construction of a driveway widening that would involve construction of an approximately 15-foot-high, cast-in-place, concrete retaining wall to the south of the Dye's present driveway. This study included a review of available geologic literature, drilling exploration borings, and performing geologic studies to assess the type, thickness, distribution, and physical properties of the subsurface sediments and ground water conditions. Geotechnical engineering studies were also conducted to recommend the types of suitable foundation support, depth to suitable foundation, allowable foundation soil bearing pressures, anticipated foundation settlements, retaining wall lateral pressures, structural fill placement and compaction, drainage considerations, and erosion mitigation recommendations. This report summarizes our current fieldwork and offers development recommendations based on our present understanding of the project. 1.2 Authorization Written authorization to proceed with this study was granted by Mr. Bob Dye. Our study was accomplished in general accordance with our proposal dated January 18, 2007. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Mr. Bob Dye and his agents for specific application to this project. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering and engineering geology practices in effect in this area at the time our report was prepared. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. Our observations, findings, and opinions are a means to identify and reduce the inherent risks to the owner. March 13, 2007 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JNS!dr -KE070035AJ -Projects\20070035\KElWP Page 1 I . j , I. Dye Residence Renton, Washington 2.0 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 Project Description Subswface Exploration and Geotechnica/ Engineering Report Project and Site Conditions This report was completed with an understanding of the project based on our discussions with Mr. Clemons Rossell, the project structural engineer, and Mr. Bob Dye, the property owner. Present plans call for construction of an approximately 15-foot-high, cast-in-place, concrete retaining wall to the south of the present driveway to allow filling of that area to street grade to create additional drive and parking area at the southeast corner of the lot. The existing terraced, concrete rubble planter will be removed. 2.2 Site Description The property was located at 7029 Ripley Lane North, just west of the Burlington Northern's railroad on the west side of Ripley Lane North, adjacent to Lake Washington. The approximately 3,900 square-foot parcel was constructed level with Ripley Lane North on the east side, then slopes down to Lake Washington on the west. Total elevation change across the property was on the order of 15 feet. Vegetation consisted of landscape bushes, trees, and grass. The subject site appears to straddle the boundary between the city of Renton and unincorporated King County, with most of the site lying within King County. The property is not classified by either King County or the City of Renton as a Geologic Hazard Area. 3.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Our field study included drilling two exploration borings and a geologic reconnaissance to gain information about the site. The various types of sediments, as well as the depths where characteristics of the sediments changed, are indicated on the exploration logs presented in the Appendix. The depths indicated on the logs where conditions changed may represent gradational variations between sediment types. Our explorations were approximately located in the field by measuring from known site features. We did not have a topographic survey at the time of our fieldwork. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the exploration borings and geologic reconnaissance completed for this study. The number, locations, and depths of the explorations were completed within site and budgetary constraints. Because of the nature of exploratory work below ground, extrapolation of subsurface conditions between field explorations is necessary. Differing subsurface conditions may sometimes be present due to the random nature of deposition and the alteration of topography by past grading and/ or filling. The nature and extent of any variations between the field explorations may not become March 13, 2007 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JNS!dr -KE070035Al -ProjeClsl200700351KE\WP Page 2 ' . r , i . i ; r, [ [ i I ; ' ' i ' ; ' ' Dye Residence Renton, Washington Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Engineering Repon Project and Site Conditions fully evident until construction. If variations are observed at that time, it may be necessary to re-evaluate specific recommendations in this report and make appropriate changes. 3. 1 Exploration Borings During drilling, samples were obtained at generally 2. 5-or 5-foot-depth intervals. Due to limited site access, an Acker/skid-mounted, limited-access drill rig was used to explore the site. This drilling equipment uses a 2 %-inch, inside-diameter, hollow-stem auger. The borings were continuously observed and logged by a geologist from our firm. The exploration logs presented in the Appendix are based on the field logs, drilling action, and visual classification of the samples secured. Disturbed, but representative samples were obtained from our borings by using the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) procedure in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM):D 1586. This test and sampling method consists of driving a standard 2-inch, outside-diameter, split-barrel sampler a distance of 18 inches into the soil with a 140-pound hammer free-falling a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows for each 6-inch interval is recorded, and the number of blows required to drive the sampler the final 12 inches is known as the Standard Penetration Resistance ("N") or blow count. If a total of 50 is recorded within one 6-inch interval, the blow count is recorded as the number of blows for the corresponding number of inches of penetration. The blow count provides a measure of the relative density of granular soils or the relative consistency of cohesive soils; these values are plotted on the attached boring logs. The samples obtained from the split-barrel sampler were classified in the field and representative portions placed in watertight containers. The samples were then transported to our laboratory for further visual classification and laboratory testing. Testing was limited to visual-manual classification of the collected samples in general accordance with ASTM standard practices. 4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions at the project site were inferred from the subsurface explorations accomplished for this study, visual reconnaissance of the site, and review of applicable geologic literature. As shown on the exploration logs, the explorations generally encountered fill materials overlying native dense to very dense, silty sand. Minor amounts of clay were also encountered in some locations. The following section presents more detailed subsurface information organized from the shaUowest (youngest) to the deepest (oldest) sediment types. March 13, 2007 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, !NC. JNS!dr -KE070035AI -Projects\200700351KE\WP Page 3 I , I.· ' , : ' ' ' ; Dye Residence Renton, Washington 4.1 Stratigraphy Fill Subsu,face Exploration and Geotechnica/ Engineering Report Project and Site Conditions Fill soils (not naturally placed) were encountered in boring EB-I. The fill thickness was approximately 6.5 feet and typically consisted of loose, moist, brown to gray, silty sand with few fine to coarse gravel and trace to few organics. The fill was placed behind a terraced, concrete rubble planter that extended from street level down to the level of the backyard. Fill should also be expected elsewhere on the site, particularly adjacent to existing buildings, buried utilities, and driveway/landscape areas. These materials appear to vary in both quality and depth across the site. Since the quality, thickness, and compaction of the fill materials are low or variable, the fill is considered unsuitable for structural support. However, this material could be used behind the new retaining wall as structural fill if it is moisture-conditioned and any deleterious material is removed. Pre-Fraser Undifferentiated Natural soils beneath the fill materials, and at the surface where fill materials were absent, generally consisted of dense to very dense, moist, brown to gray, fine-coarse sand with few silt (typically interbedded and mildy oxidized) and trace gravels. With depth, these materials typically became denser. This material has been overridden by past glacial incursions into the Puget Sound basin, resulting in a soil with high compressive strength and relatively low permeability. This soil is suitable for the support of the retaining wall foundations. 4.2 Geologic Literature We reviewed the Geologic Map of Su,jicia/ Deposits in the Seattle 1:100,000 Quadrangle, Washington, by James C. Yount, James P. Minard, and Glen R. Dembroff (1993). This publication shows the site area is mantled by early-late Pleistocene-age undifferentiated nonglacial sediments with undifferentiated glacial sediments. Geologic mapping at the published scale only shows regional trends in sediment type. Therefore, the boundaries between units and sediment/rock type in any given area are sometimes mapped approximately. The geologic units and sediment/rock type in any given area are sometimes mapped approximately. The mapped geologic units are in general conformance with our findings at the site. 4.3 Hydrology Ground water seepage was encountered in exploration EB-2 at the time of our field study in February 2007. The depth of seepage was observed at about 7 feet below existing site grade and probably indicated the water table associated with Lake Washington. Fluctuations in the level of the ground water may occur due to variations in the amount of rainfall, time of the year, lake levels, and changes in site development. March 13, 2007 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JNS!dr -KE070035Al. Prajectsl20070035\KE\WP Page 4 ,-, Dye Residence Renton, Washington 5.0 INTRODUCTION II. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS Subsuiface Exploration and Geotechnical Engineering Report Design Recommendations Our exploration indicates that, from a geotechnical standpoint, the parcel is suitable for the proposed development provided the recommendations contained herein are properly followed. The bearing stratum is relatively shallow, and spread footing foundations may be utilized. Consequently, foundations bearing on the dense natural soils or structural fill are capable of providing suitable building support. 6.0 SITE PREPARATION 6. 1 Demolition Landscape features presently on the site that are under building areas or not part of future plans should be removed and disposed of off-site. Any buried utilities should be removed or relocated if they are under building areas. The resulting depressions should be backfilled with structural fill, as discussed under the "Structural Fill" section. 6.2 Clearing and Stripping Site preparation of the planned retammg wall should include removal of all trees, brush, debris, and any other deleterious material. Additionally, the upper organic topsoil should be removed· and the remaining roots grubbed. Areas where loose surficial soils exist due to grubbing operations should be considered as fill to the depth of disturbance and treated as subsequently recommended for structural fill placement. Loose surficial soil and topsoil should be stripped down to the underlying dense sand. Since the density of the soil is variable, random soft pockets may exist, and the depth and extent of stripping can best be determined in the field by the geotechnical engineer or their representative. 6.3 Temporary Cut Slopes In our opinion, stable construction slopes should be the responsibility of the contractor and should be determined during construction, based on the local conditions encountered at that time. For planning purposes, we anticipate that temporary, unsupported cut slopes in the native unsaturated sand can be made at a maximum slope of lH:lV (Horizontal:Vertical). March 13, 2007 JNS/dr -KE070035AJ -Projects\20070035\KEIWP ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC Page 5 ' ' l ! . I; I . i ; I i I : Dye Residence Renton, Washington Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnica/ Engineering Report Design Recommendations Where ground water seepage is present, shallower slopes or shoring may be required. As is typical with earthwork operations, some sloughing and raveling may occur, and cut slopes may have to be adjusted in the field. In addition, WISHA/OSHA regulations should be followed at all times. 6. 4 Site Disturbance The site soils contain some fine-grained material that makes them somewhat moisture-sensitive and subject to disturbance when wet. The contractor must use care during site preparation and excavation operations so that the underlying soils are not softened. If disturbance occurs, the softened soils should be removed and the area brought to grade with structural fill. 6.5 Permanent Cut Slopes Permanent, unsupported cut slopes comprised of structural fill should not exceed a gradient of 2H: IV. All permanent slopes should be revegetated or otherwise protected from erosion as soon as possible after they are constructed. 7.0 STRUCTURAL FILL Structural fill will be necessary behind the retaining wall for support of the proposed driveway. All references to structural fill in this report refer to subgrade. preparation, fill type, and placement and compaction of materials, as discussed in this section. If a percentage of compaction is specified under another section of this report, the value given in that section should be used. 7 .1 Subgrade Compaction After overexcavation/stripping has been performed, the upper 12 inches of exposed ground should be recompacted to a firm, unyielding condition, as determined by the geotechnical engineer or their representative. If the subgrade contains too much moisture, suitable recompaction may be difficult or impossible to obtain and should probably not be attempted. In lieu of recompaction, the area to receive fill should be blanketed with washed rock or quarry spalls to act as a capillary break between the new fill and the wet subgrade. Where the exposed ground remains soft and further overexcavation is impractical, placement of an engineering stabilization fabric may be necessary to prevent contamination of the free-draining layer by silt migration from below. After the recompacted, exposed ground is tested and approved, or a free-draining rock course is laid, structural fill may be placed to attain desired grades. March 13. 2007 JNS!dr -KE070035Al -Projectsl20070035\KE\WP ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC Page 6 I • r' i ,. ' . ! • • j i i f Dye Residence Renton, Washington 7. 2 Structural Fill Compaction Subsu,jace Exploration and Geotechnica/ Engineering Report Design Recommendations Structural fill is defined as non-organic soil, acceptable to the geotechnical engineer, placed in maximum 8-inch loose lifts, with each lift being compacted to at least 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density using ASTM:D 1557 as the standard. Roadway and utility trench backfill should be placed and compacted in accordance with applicable municipal codes and standards. The top of the compacted fill should extend horizontally a minimum distance of 3 feet beyond the perimeter footings or pavement edges before sloping down at an angle no steeper than 2H: 1 V. Fill slopes should either be overbuilt and trimmed back to final grade or surface-compacted to the specified density. 7 .3 Moisture-Sensitive Fill Soils in which the amount of fine-grained material (smaller than the No. 200 sieve) is greater than approximately 5 percent (measured on the minus No. 4 sieve size) should be considered moisture-sensitive. Use of moisture-sensitive soil in structural fills should be limited to favorable dry weather conditions. The shallow on-site soils generally contained some silt and are considered moisture-sensitive. In addition, construction equipment traversing the site when the soils are wet can cause considerable disturbance. If fill is placed during wet weather or if proper compaction cannot be obtained, a select import material consisting of a clean, free- draining gravel and/or sand should be used. Free-draining fill consists of non-organic soil with the amount of fine-grained material limited to 5 percent by weight when measured on the minus No. 4 sieve fraction. 7.4 Structural Fill Testing The contractor should note that any proposed fill soils must be evaluated by AESI prior to their use in fills. This would require that we have a sample of the material at least 72 hours in advance to perform a Proctor test and determine its field compaction standard. A representative from our firm should observe the stripped subgrade and be present during placement of structural fill to document the work and perform a representative number of in- place density tests. In this way, the adequacy of the earthwork may be evaluated as filling progresses and problem areas may be corrected at that time. It is important to understand that taking random compaction tests on a part-time basis will not assure uniformity or acceptable performance of a fill. As such, we are available to aid the owner in developing a suitable monitoring and testing frequency. March 13, 2007 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JNSldr -KE070035Al -Pro/ects\20070035\KE\WP Page 7 ! . ' . ! . ! ' , '. l ' . ' ' Dye Residence Renton, Washington 8.0 FOUNDATIONS 8. 1 Allowable Soil Bearing Pressure Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Engineering Reporl Design Recommendations Spread footings may be used for structure support when founded either directly on the medium dense natural sediments, or on structural fill placed over these materials, as described under the "Site Preparation" and "Structural Fill" sections of this report. For footings founded either directly upon the medium dense natural sediments, or on structural fill as described above, we recommend that an allowable bearing pressure of 3,500 pounds per square foot (psf) be used for design purposes, including both dead and live loads. An increase of one-third may be used for short-term wind or seismic loading. 8. 2 Footing Depths The footing for the proposed wall should be buried a minimum of 18 inches into the surrounding soil for frost protection. All footings must penetrate to the prescribed stratum, and no footings should be founded in or above loose, organic, or existing fill soils. 8.3 Footings Adjacent to Cuts The area bound by lines extending downward at lH: 1 V from any footing must not intersect another footing or intersect a filled area that has not been compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM:D 1557. In addition, a l.5H:1V line extending down from any footing must not daylight because sloughing or raveling may eventually undermine the footing. Thus footings should not be placed near the edges of steps or cuts in the bearing soils. 8.4 Footing Settlement Anticipated settlement of footings, founded as described above, should be on the order of 1 inch or less. However, disturbed soil not removed from footing excavations prior to footing placement could result in increased settlements. 8. 5 Footing Sub grade Bearing Verification All footing areas should be observed by AES! prior to placing concrete to verify that the exposed soils can support the design foundation bearing capacity and that construction conforms to the recommendations in this report. Foundation bearing verification may also be required by the governing municipality. March I 3. 2007 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES. INC. JNS!dr -KE070035Al -Projects\20070035\KEIWP Page 8 '. ' - (·' Dye Residence Renton, Washington 8. 6 Foundation Drainage Subsu,face Exploration and Geotechnical Engineering Report Design Recommendations Footing drains should be provided, as discussed under the "Drainage Considerations" section of this report. 9.0 LATERAL WALL PRESSURES All backfill behind the wall or around foundations should be placed following our recommendations for structural fill and as described in this section of the report. Horizontally backfilled walls, which are free to yield laterally at least 0.1 percent of their height, may be designed using an equivalent fluid equal to 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). Fully restrained, horizontally backfilled, rigid walls that cannot yield should be designed for an equivalent fluid of 50 pcf. A surcharge equivalent to 2 feet of soil should be added to the wall height in determining lateral design forces to account for cars parking behind the wall. 9 .1 Wall Backfill The lateral pressures presented above are based on the conditions of a uniform backfill consisting of granular fill within 3 feet of the wall compacted to 90 to 95 percent of ASTM:D 1557. A higher degree of compaction within 3 feet of the wall is not recommended, as this will increase the pressure acting on the wall. A lower compaction may result in fill settlement. Thus, the compaction is critical and must be tested by our firm during placement. Surcharges from adjacent footings, heavy construction equipment, or sloping ground must be added to the above values. Footing drains should be provided for the retaining wall, as discussed under the "Drainage Considerations" section of this report. 9.2 Wall Drainage It is imperative that proper drainage be provided so that hydrostatic pressures do not develop against the wall. This would involve installation of a minimum, I-foot-wide, blanket drain for the full wall height to within 1 foot of final grade using imported washed gravel against the wall. If drainage mat is used, it should be installed according to the manufacturer's specifications. 9.3 Passive Resistance and Friction Factor Lateral loads can be resisted by friction between the foundation and the natural dense sediments or supporting structural fill soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the buried portions of the foundations. The foundations must be backfilled with compacted structural fill March 13, 2007 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JNS!dr -KE070035Al -Projects\20070035\KEIWP Page 9 1. f • Dye Residence Renton, Washington Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnica/ Engineering Report Design Recommendations i . to achieve the passive resistance provided below. We recommend the following allowable I • ' ! '. I • design parameters: • Passive equivalent fluid = 250 pcf • Coefficient of friction = 0. 35 10.0 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS The near-surface soils appear to contain some silt, and water may tend to perch atop this stratum. Additionally, traffic across these soils when they are damp or wet will result in disturbance of the otherwise firm stratum. Therefore, prior to site work and construction, the contractor should be prepared to provide drainage and sub grade protection, as necessary. 10 .1 Wall/Foundation Drains All retaining walls should be provided with a drain at the footing elevation. Drains should consist of rigid, perforated, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe surrounded by washed pea gravel. The level of the perforations in the pipe should be set down at the bottom of the footing, and the drains should be constructed with sufficient gradient to allow gravity discharge away from the wall. All retaining walls should be lined with a minimum, 12-inch-thick, washed gravel blanket provided to within 1 foot of finish grade, and which ties into the footing drain. Roof and surface runoff should not discharge into the footing drain system, but should be handled by a separate, rigid, tightline drain. If drainage mat is used, it should be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The driveway grades adjacent to the house should be sloped downward away from the structure to achieve surface drainage. Final exterior grades should promote free and positive drainage away from the structure at all times. A minimum driveway gradient of I percent should be provided unless provisions are included for collection and disposal of surface water adjacent to the structure. 11.0 PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MONITORING We are available to provide additional geotechnical consultation as the project design develops and possibly changes from that upon which this report is based. We recommend that AESI perform a geotechnical plan review prior to completion of the final design. In this way, our earthwork and foundation recommendations may be properly interpreted and implemented in the design. March 13, 2007 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JNS!dr -KE070035Al -Projec/s\200700351KE\WP Page 10 '' '' r • ' . '. ' ' i i .. Dye Residence Renton, Washington Subsu,face Exploration and Geotechnital Engineering Report Design Recommendations We are also available to provide geotechnical engineering and monitoring services during construction. The integrity of the foundation depends on proper site preparation and construction procedures. In addition, engineering decisions may have to be made in the field in the event that variations in subsurface conditions become apparent. Construction monitoring services are not part of this current scope of work. We have enjoyed working with you on this study and are confident that these recommendations will aid in the successful completion of your project. If you should have any questions or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Kirkland, Washington Jon N. Sondergaard, P.G., P.E.G. Principal Engineering Geologist Attachments: March 13, 2007 Figure I: Figure 2: Appendix: Vicinity Map Site Sketch Exploration Logs JNS/dr -KE070035AJ ~ Projectsl20070035\KEIWP . I)"\ .. "i-" 'I•• \ > C 1 / .; . ) fu--xp-n-,,s-2-,t ·, O~ Matthew A. Miller, P.E. Associate Engineer ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Page 11 ii ~ e ' > " 'l :; ! ~ --" ., .~ ;t.,,,.l;~"''~~ , ,,-+"'· I • . ··-~ . ,~\t· \ ..,, I ·, ~ j \'' "·\, I:) ~• H'II 1 _~.::) I ··--· ____ S;- "'' .,,,,_,,,.,,, N A NO SCALE ........ '" •· ..... ' ....... ; i .. , ~-------, ;,.-, :t I ft ~t . .!i1 ·-; 1 r: '1 ' 'f"' ·~'liW ,..,. ,. A 1,,-r .. .' i'.. Associated Earth Sciences T~~ !l! _.__.."'~'-'"'-·uu..._ ..... L.oU..I.Ul IJ'I...L-.;;;;.1.1.,._,;,;;:.:,, .l..lLL. VICINITY MAP ' I l _,.,.,:1 j_l \:/r,; F.., t I n ri +"+ I ' ': 1, I, i I I \ \ . ' . \ \' ,-.. \. I ' \, \ l~· \\ -----.,1 ,:_ ·'= ") '·; I ~,. ' l-' = ·. ·. :"', __ ·•.·.~--1-' .. ·-.... -~ _· t",:: ~ .. l t,.,,,i ".· ... lso. 2,. ::_ .•• , :.., .--· ...... d ' .... I~ 1 "· e > . -:"'"""""'"''"i....,...""'"'""'"""..., • .....,,.,"'---' , cw ~ ••• t}:{·t·.~1,:,,, ·., ..... ·~, ... * 'I}~ .... • .... ,/ • .,.. ~"· 11'.'. .~(J ' .:~ ":. ~\::, .:~/."'"~;J~ ~tJ JW.r .. \r-t,, ! ]·:1 ', ,' ;;1_L::r:_~:._:.-··~:::<~-"-~--: 11\:t 1 ::11 ·, .,,t; ~·E· 68 .,H ,.t....J -~··:-'( .. '..);: :.. : '~ l ~: f(/) ,', t·~1 \rn ~1~ ~. ;;: . ·-I '" 7-0TII _ _EJ I ff, I:::... F ' .-, I':' '.. t'"• I .;z{: -·--.. t,~---r.-:/;. __ >w--~:: /::Nii :;,'<: ; /;· ~ :.. .. ·-I ,. ::·,'--~:-. ;::; :,,?~ - ! ~<' •-I ! ... .i' "" •• , ·\! 1 1n11 i .... ____ "''· :i "";. 1 if..~ J-~· _! --~~fh ' :, .::r :----'---~ ,_ S1 ©2004 Thomas Bros. Maps ...... .. FIGURE 1 ~ llmJ 1•· 1 ~ ~ ~ DYE RESIDENCE § ID :~~ ~ IE ~ RENTON, WASHINGTON PROJ. NO. KE07DD35A :;, ____________________________________ _ DATE 3/07 ---~-~ ---________ ........ _________________________ ~__;_~__;_-~---~-=--~--------~ s ! ~ ~ n n ~ :; HOUSE N A NO SCALE DYE RESIDENCE WALL I ii--EB-2 ~, • V TERRACED PLANT~R w ,--. TO BE REMOVED , "I I ·• . 1 Cl / ~ ~I iy/~ ·, ... "-( ~I I ,,...---, : (./ / ·,,j I I "-, w ~ I / a: I / I • EB-1 0 \{ . ' ~ RIPLEY LANE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXPLORATION BORING TYP YARD i======================::~= ~ Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. SITE SKETCH FIGURE 2 ~ fal [iiijiJ ~ &I ~ DYE RESIDENCE DATE 3107 § . . . . . ~ -. • . ~ RENTON, WASHINGTON PROJ. NO. KED70035A ,-==-------------------------------- I, r 1 ' I ' i l ' , l i i ; I ' ' ' APPENDIX ! -, [; ' . ' ' ' . ' . Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Exolorat Loa ~ [ft] ~ ~ m Project Number I Exploration Number I Sheet . . KE070035A EB-1 1 of 1 . Project Name D~e Residence Ground Surface Elevation (ft) -·· -·------- Location Ri,nton WA -----Datum "'" Driller/Equipment Geologic Drill/SQlit SQoon--Date Start/Finish 2/J 4/0Z 2/J 4/0l Hammer WeighUDrop 140# / 30" Hole Diameter (in) -------------·---------------------- l~i -~----·~------- g 00 u-1 = !l Q) ·-0 " se w .c .0 Blows/Foot Q) ~ 0. c. E _J 00 ,--~ s E [" >, ~~ Q) 0 :;; Q) "' C) U) ~in 0 T Cf) 0 .c DESCRIPTION 0 6 10 20 30 40 Fill j S-1 loose, moist, dark brown/gray, silty SAND, few fine to coarse gravel, trace 3 ... to few organics. 3 4 ~ 5 Loose, moist, gray with some oxidation, silty SAND, trace fine to coarse S-2 3 , 9 gravel, trace organics. 4 -. ----Qpf -Pre-Fraser, Undifferentiated 5 S-3 Dense, moist, brown/gray, fine to coarse SAND, little fine to coarse gravel, 22 ... ,, 18 few silt. 14 i.J. -10 ] S-4 Very dense, moist, gray, sandy clayey SILT, few fine to coarse gravel. 30 01:' "Driller adds water and notes less gravels/possible sand lens. -15 I Very dense, moist, brown, fine to coarse SAND, trace to few silt, trace fine 341 S-5 gravel. 0/! ' 50/ " ~ 20 I Very dense, wet, blue-gray, fine to coarse SAND, little silt interbeds, few S-6 30 fine to coarse gravel, clay present. 32 • 82/ 1" I -----"' ' Bottom of exploration boring at 21.5 feet ' i -25 ' -30 I I I r 35 I I j Sampler Type (ST): lil 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) D No Recovery M -Moisture Logged by: JOH [IJ 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) I] Ring Sample 2 Water Level O Approved by: ~ Grab Sample 0 Shelby Tube San1ple Y Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) ( . I , '. Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Exolora 1Log Project Number I Exploration Number ! Sheet 1 of 1 Project Name Location Driller/Equipment Hammer Weight/Drop KE070035A EB-2 Dye Res'1dence ... ---------------___ _ _.R-en~t,,,o,_,n~W,,,A~~=~---·-----------~ ...,G=eo~l~o,,g,.,ic._.D"""rilecli,.,S,,,p,,_litscS"'p"'o~o~n.,_ ____________ _ 140# / 30" Ground Surface Elevation {ft) Datum __b.l_LA_ __________ _ Date Start/Finish .2L14LOZ,2/141DZ Hole Diameter (in) --------·-- c-··-~---,--~-~---~ -----------------------,---,-r------------~---1 1~i~1~ g ~ o-·-0 ~ £.c £ C. c. E C. ·S E i" » ID T "' CJ U) a U) S-1 -5 S-2 r S-3 1: ' -10 I S-4 1--15 1--20 -25 -30 ~ -35 DESCRIPTION Qpf -Pre-Fraser, Undifferentiated Dense, moist, brown/gray with oxidation, fine to coarse SAND, with interbed silt lenses, trace fine gravel. Very dense, moist, brown/gray, fine to coarse SAND, trace to few silt, trace fine gravel. Very dense, very moist to wet, gray/brown, fine to coarse SAND, few interbed silt lenses, trace fine to coarse gravel. *Driller notes possible water as reason for decrease in blow counts. Very dense, wet, gray, fine to coarse SAND, trace to few silt, trace gravel. Bottom of exploration boring at 11 feet > E 2 ..Q 8 ~ co 5 15 25 10 25 31 l'. 22 39 23 31 50 Blows/Foot 10 20 30 40 t· ' 56 I L, l· ~ "l---,c-L...l,--~L--=!c,----------------------------..L-l.' _[__l_ _ _l _ _J __ J__.L_..L_L...J I Sampler Type (ST): b [I] 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) 0 No Recovery M • Moisture :§ [I] 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) (] Ring Sample :SZ Water Level () Logged by: JDH Approved by: ffi ~ Grab Sample [I Shelby Tube Sample:?: Water Level at time of drilflng (ATD) ~'-----------------"=----------------------------------' Trans Code: Policy Number: File Number Amount: Premium: $ $ 010 SV3958326 5207013682 OLD REPUBLIC TITLE, LTD. SCHEDULE A ALTA OWNER'S POLICY 685,000.00 1,264.00 1. Policy Date: September 8, 2003 at 1 :16 p.m. 2. Name of Insured: PATRICK DYE, an unmarried man t,.\JG 2 2 2007 RECf..\\JE.P 3. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is: FEE SIMPLE 4. Title to the estate or interest covered by this policy at the date hereof is vested in: PATRICK DYE, an unmarried man 5. The land referred to in this policy is situated in the County of King, State of Washington, and is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION This Policy valid only if Schedule B is attached. SV3958326/0713682 Page 1 EXHIBIT"A" The Northe~y 16.8 feet of Lot 29 and all of Lot 28, Block 'C', C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATILE, DIVISION NO. 3, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page(s) 81, records of King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH Second Class Shore Lands adjoining SITUATE in the County of King, State of Washington. END OF EXHIBIT "A" SV3958326/0713682 Page2 SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of the following: STANDARD EXCEPTIONS 1. Encroachments or questions of location, boundary and area, which an accurate survey may disclose. 2. Public or Private easements, streets, roads, alleys, or highways, unless disclosed by record by recorded plat or conveyance, or decree of a court of record. 3. Rights or claims of persons in possession, or claiming to be in possession, not disclosed by the public records. 4. Material or labor liens, or liens under the Workman's Compensation Act not disclosed by the public records. 5. Water rights or matters relating thereto. 6. Any service, installation or general connection charges for sewer, water, electricity, telephone, gas or garbage removal. 7. Exceptions and reservations in United States Patents; Indian Treaty or Aboriginal Rights. 8. Right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America, in the exercise of powers over navigation. 9. Any prohibition or limitation on the use, occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land. 10. General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. NOTICE OF CHARGES BY WATER, SEWER AND STORM & SURFACE WATER UTILITIES: By: Recorded: Recording No.: City of Bellevue December 20, 1996 9612200938 2. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Grantor: Trustee: Beneficiary: Amount: Dated: Recorded: Recording No.: Patrick Dye, an unmarried man Old Republic Title Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as nominee for LoanCity.com, a California corporation $409,000.00 September 2, 2003 September 8, 2003 20030908001803 3. ACCESS TO SAID PROPERTY is across Northern Pacific Railway Company (now Burlington lnc)'s right-of-way as granted by Easement recorded under King County Recording No's. 3013390 and 5254582, and by Permit under Recording No. 5284825. Said Access right-of-way is revocable by said Railway Company and subject to certain conditions set forth therein SV395832610713682 Page 3 4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Grantee: Purpose: Area Affected: Recorded: Recording No.: Puget Sound Power and Light Company, a Massachusetts Corporation Electric transmission and/or distribution lines Easterly portion of said Premises Undisclosed 2734038 Refer to the record for full particulars. 5. TERMS, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND/OR OBLIGATIONS OF PROPERTY LINE AGREEMENT: Recorded: Recording No.: Undisclosed 6572796 6. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF BENEFICIAL EASEMENT: Purpose: Recorded: Recording No.: Affects: · Regarding: Existing concrete retaining wall September 21, 1990 9009210911 Over adjoining property Maintenance of said Easement and other provisions 7. RIGHTS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON in and to that portion of said Premises, if any, lying in the Bed of Lake Washington, if it is navigable. 8. ANY PROHIBITION OR LIMITATION on the use, occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or any part thereof. 9. RIGHTS OF THE UNITED STATES AND/OR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, and of the appropriate agencies of each, under its constitution, statutes and regulation, including Indian Tribes or Nations, in regard to the use or occupancy of that portion of property herein described lying below the line of mean high tide. 10. RIGHTS IN THE GENERAL PUBLIC to the unrestricted use of all the waters of a navigable body of water not only for the primary purpose of navigation, but also for corollary purposes; jt/jt including, but not limited to, fishing, boating, bathing, swimming, water skiing, and other related recreational purposes, as those waters may affect the second class Shorelands and adjoining uplands; and whether the level of the water has been raised or lowered naturally or artificially to a maintained or fluctuating level, all as defined by the court decisions of the judicial bodies of the State of Washington. END OF SCHEDULE B SV3958326/0713682 Page4 TO: PATRICK DYE 7029 RIPLEY LANEN. RENTON, WA 98056 ENCLOSED IS YOUR FINAL POLICY. THANK YOU FOR CHOOSING OLD REPUBLIC TITLE. ENDORSEMENT To be attached and become a part of Policy No. SV3958326/5207013682 1. This endorsement shall be effective only if at Date of Policy there is located on the land described in the policy a one-to-four family residential structure, in which the insured owner resides or intends to reside. For the purpose of this endorsement the term "residential structure" is defined as the principal dwelling structure located on the land together with all improvements thereon related to residential use of the property except plantings of any nature, perimeter fences and perimeter walls, and the term "insured owne(' is defined as any insured named in Schedule A and, subject to any rights or defenses the Company may have had under the policy and all endorsements, such insured owne(s heirs, distributees, devisees, survivors, personal representatives or next of kin. 2. The Company hereby insures the insured owner of the estate or interest described in Schedule A against loss or damage which the insured owner shall sustain by reason of: a. the existence at Date of Policy of any statutory lien for labor or materials attaching to the estate or interest referred to in Schedule A arising out of any work of improvement on the land, in progress or completed at Date Of Policy, except those liens arising out of a work of improvement for which the insured owner has agreed to be responsible. b. the removal of the residential structure or the interference with the use thereof for ordinary residential purposes as the result of a final court order or judgment, based upon the existence at Date of Policy of: (1) any encroachment of said residential structure or any part thereof onto adjoining lands, or onto any easement shown as an exception in Schedule B of said Policy, or onto any unrecorded subsurface easement; (2) any violation on the land of enforceable covenants, conditions or restrictions, provided that this coverage shall not refer to or include the terms, covenants and conditions contained in any lease, sul>- lease, or contract of sale referred to in the policy; (3) any violation of applicable zoning ordinances to the extent that such ordinances regulate (a) area, width or depth of the land as a building site for the residential structure; (b) floor space area of the residential structure; (c) set back of the residential structure from the property lines of the land; or (d) height of the residential structure. c. damage to the residential structure resulting from the exercise of any right to use the surface of the land for the extraction or development of minerals excepted from the description of the land or shown as a reservation in Schedule B. For the purposes of this endorsement, the words "covenants", "conditions" or "restrictions" shall not be deemed to refer to or include any covenants, conditions or restrictions relating to environmental protection, except to the extent that a notice of a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy and is not excepted in Schedule B. This endorsement is made a part of the policy and is subject to all of the terms and provisions thereof and of any prior endorsement thereto. Except to the extent expressly stated, it neither modifies any of the terms and provisions of the policy and any prior endorsements, nor does it extend the effective date of the policy and any prior endorsements, nor does it increase the face amount thereof. OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A Corporation 400 Second Avenue South (612) 371-1111 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 ~&/h1'6 Authorized Signatory TIM Form 2960-R (Endorsement WA-9) CLTA Form 126.1 (9-10-93) ENDORSEMENT To be attached and become a part of Policy No. SV3958326/5207013682 The undersigned insuring Company hereby insures that notwithstanding anything therein contained to the contrary, the attached policy shall be supplemented and amended as follows: The amount of insurance provided by the Owners Policy of Title Insurance to which this endorsement is attached, as stated in Schedule A thereof, is subject to cumulative annual upward adjustments in the manner and to the extent hereinafter specified. "Adjustment Date" is defined, for purposes of this endorsement, to be 12:01 a.m. on the first January 1 which occurs more than six months after the Date of Policy of the title insurance policy to which this endorsement is attached, as shown in Schedule A thereof, and 12:01 a.m. on each January 1 thereafter; provided, however, there shall be no more than ten adjustments dates on which the amount of insurance provided by such title insurance policy shall be eligible for upward adjustment. An upward adjustment will be made on each of the Adjustment Dates, as defined above, by increasing the maximum amount of insurance provided by said Policy (as said Amount may have been increased theretofore under the terms of this Endorsement) by the same percentage, if any, by which the United States Department of Commerce Composite Construction Cost Index (base period 1967) for the month of September immediately preceding exceeds the highest Index number for the month of September in any previous year which is subsequent to Date of Policy; provided, however, that the maximum amount of insurance in force shall never exceed 150% of the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A of said Policy, less the amount of any claim paid under said Policy which, under the terms of the Conditions and Stipulations, reduces the amount of insurance in force. There shall be no annual adjustment in the amount of insurance for years in which there is no increase in said Construction Cost Index. In the settlement of any claim made against the insurer on the title insurance policy to which this endorsement is attached, the amount of insurance provided by such policy shall be deemed to be the amount which is in force as of the date on which the claimant first learns of the assertion or possible assertion of such claim or as of the date of receipt by the Company of the first notice of such claim, whichever shall first occur. PROVIDED HOWEVER, this endorsement shall be effective only if one of the following conditions exists at Date of Policy: (a) The land described in this policy is a parcel on which there is only a one-to-four family residential structure, including all improvements on the land related to residential use, in which the Insured Owner resides or intends to reside; or (b) The land consists of a residential condominium unit, together with the common elements appurtenant thereto and related to residential use thereof, in which the Insured Owner resides or intends to reside. This endorsement is made a part of the policy and is subject to the Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations therein, except as modified by the provisions hereof. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as extending the effective date of said policy unless otherwise expressly stated. NOTE: In the event of future reissuance of the aforesaid Owners Policy of Title Insurance, the reissued rate shall be predicated only on the original amount of insurance and not the adjustment amount. OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A Corporation 400 Second Avenue South (612) 371-1111 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Authorized Signatory TIM Form 2591 (OTIRB Inflation Protection Endorsement (1978) I illlUU ~ lVH:111 -:'.)c:lUUHUU~J UllUU.liUlll rugc; 1 u1 L- Yahoo 1 My Yahooi Mail Tutorials More Welcome, sabailao Sign Out Help "h_SoOf,. MAIL Search: . Web Search J Mail Plus J Addresses y Calendar y Notepad y Mail For Mobile -Mai1Up$ades -Qptions Check Mail Folders lnbox (9) Draft Sent Bulk (561) Trash Compose [Add -Edit] [Empty] [Empty] Search Shortcuts My Photos My Attachments Search Mail Search the Web Previous I Nex_t I E}ack to Messages Delete I Reply • I Forward y I Spam I Move... y I This message is not flagged. [ Flag Message -Mark as Unread ] Subject: r§) Title .... Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:27:24 -0700 Printable View From: "Kathleen McNeely" <KMcNeely@ortc.com> !zl Add to Address Book ll Add Mobile Alert To: sabailao@yahoo.com Hi Pat I've attached a copy of your Owner's Policy that we insured in 2003. Since the date of this Policy, our Company has insured a refinance of the Deed of Trust showing on said Policy. This Deed of Trust is in favor of Loan City, recorded April 8, 2004. (I'm not allowed to send you that Policy) There are no changes in title since the date of this Owner's Polley other than the refinance. If you have any questions or need anything more, please feel free to contact me. Kathy Kathy McNeely, Title Officer Old Republic Title, Unit 8 Phone 425-776-9141 ------------------------------ Fax 425-776-3990 Attachments Files: r§) 0713682.pdf (23k) Attachment scanning provided by: Notton AntlVlrus Scan an_d Save to Computer Delete I Reply • I Forward • I Spam I Move... • I Save Mes~e Text l Full Headers_ http:/ /us.f309.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?Msgld=4582 _ 359903 _ 2654 _ 1594 _ 22402 _... 8/14/2007 J auuu: iv1au -,:,a.ua.11av1~_r,u.1vv,'-''-'u.1 Check Mail Compose Search Mail Search the Web Copyright© 1994-2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Service -CopyrighUIP Policy -Guidelines NOTICE: We collect personal information on this site. To learn more about how we use your information, 5:ee our Privacy Policy http://us.f309.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?Msgld=4582 _ 359903 _ 2654 _ 1594 _ 22402 _... 8/14/2007 08/15/2007 .. DISABLED PARKING PLACARD RECEIPT DYE,AITA A 7029 RIPLEY LANEN RENTON, HA 98059- .. ,, non L1cens . , . ·'J Wlfiiam Ae Agency,..,,. ." . s ve So .., ;11ton, ".VA 9805§ .J"pt. of L,censiN§ f1•a3 425) 228-51'\40 - AN IDENTIFICATION CARD WILL BE MAILED TO THE ABOVE NAME AND ADDRESS. PLACARD NUMBERS ISSUED: 290142P 290143P INDIVIDUAL WITH DISABILITIES PARKING PRIVILEGE EXPIRES: 08/2012 RPT ID: ADPPR FPO: ADPPR:2005/12/5.00001 (1) TD-420-802 (A/7106) Page 1 or 2 VALIDATION CODE 41173302072270815070019024072 WASHINGTON DISABLED PARKING PLACARD RECEIPT DEVELOPM~NT PLA):l(iiNG ClTY OF RENT v,·. AUG 2 2 2007 RECEl'Vf:I'· CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way 1.Al>IN\NG Renton, WA 98055 1,i,11:oN\. ~,ot\ ---------------~o~f~-"-i'c-h\.~ 0' Rt I'.. 7 1 11:i\\1 t,.'uu -· Printed: 08-22-2007 Payment Made: Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA07-094 08/22/2007 03:32 PM Receipt Number: C 1Cf. \'Ii t: 'j ~,;;. -- R0704424 Total Payment: 450.00 Payee: PATRICK DYE Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees Payments made for this receipt Trans Payment Method Check Description 1126 Amount 450.00 Amount 400.00 50.00 --------------------------~--- Account Balances Trans Account Code Description 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use or Fence Review 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 Balance Due .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00