The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReport 01_., ____ ..,...,... ... _ "' -----© ·1 g . ,, ~ • > ~ ' ' I I .. l I I .. I .J. ! ' ! i I i i i i ! ----€) "' I ·.I :! I ·I· :1 '· 1· · •. i' I, ~ ~ i·:. H, I .. ! ~· 1·. .te:; ; 0 ' ! i· m lJ (') ! ·1 : --· ""T"1 §l ~ .1 .• ~ fT1 !.-1· CD 2. 0 m .... <6 .... 1.1·· cc i i • = 0 Ji ~ ~ = .;· (I) m Cl ;;;· :::, -· ... -------@ ©J g 0 :::, 1 ! !1 ' r;;J~[i.;]t;11i19@@000i;;J9EJ I !IP'!!PIIIII I .. P1lh11!111II ' 1ii1i1111 __,,"""""r"'""'°'""'"'·I ' Pl'O'ORD$1,U::'r !() ... IQ< j ! I II Iii i m I' r . j: ~ . r Iii ; ~ n ! rr ! •ii ~.ill ! h d~rc 11111 ts;) -1 0 •• I 1111111111111h n r~~ 0 •r O " • <I> •• !::I !-v~ " ..... _. .... , ___ ..,.,.,..,,,.,., ......... "' ' ' , ------;,, / ' L/ ' ~11 ··1 ,1 ,, 'I! ------------.. ..,. ... I ' • _ J! .-' ----1 t ' l 1 'l II j 1· IP Hi IIU-i--l-la>+-l-1--Jlllji·1.1,,. i-l-l-El-+-l-+-!111 111 i J°r ,\1 ; t t,t lil---ll 0 1 l11 • l1 1l \. --, , r ' r SW :,,ITH STR~ET 11('11·~ 1'11 • 1 • 11~ I i I " +J ' ' ' : : : : i ' _J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oi on ~ . 2 11l!jllllil!!!~ I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I : I I l I i I I I i I l ! i a i I i I I • . ' -. ' ' ' ' . ' ~ -~ EXIST. WAREHOUSE TO REMAIN ,,t111•~ !'11 :11·~ q::;j !1> ·.,,. ' ' ., ' . i _o,.,, ___ "'"" -- ~n ··1 ,1 " 'II 11! '·1 ''1 ,, 'II "' 0 0 I I 'I ! : ••• fi'• if Cl] !,!, Z c~!:f!:; ··1 o::u C C: ,-- <(/)2 0 -a Cl . ~ -l -J>O 0 rz ~CXl -a z -u )> 0 s r*1 -u ;u ;u . A :t :ti -0 Cl ·il· N"'Tl:::0 a, j z I Ir '.'i°, _;u l''' vJfTlO--t I z :::0 i'' -; _ j1 1, '·~ 0 Ff;~;; ~~ 1 ·/ z --,- )> I ;!' I !,I ' ' f1r· - i1il j • 1,11-" '. 'l'-.. e,j : •O' -·-·-·-·-· ...... .,. ·-·-·-·· "' - • D I Pl • : llil"' r < m • WJ -u (.~ Ii! I I Iii !i!il i ' ~ ' iWil ..., ~ .:t I'! I •ii 111j i . n, :, h . 1q ·11 CD 5· t Ii l . I I • I ffi .... "' co t I I I Mi I = ..... o i ,I 1 !~ = ~ . I ii !1'1 s c;,: iffi 0 Ii) ' I 1111 Jg " P I 1 1 111 EB I t!· ___ , I fl ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ~! ,1 ' ' ' ' ' ' ·.1 ' ' ' ' ' ij Ii 1 ' ! ... ~;:! !i ~ §p OJ £.<Ja,1>«><;JFACf.•-•o .. otNDV~t<O 1 'I 1-I j 11111 I ' ' ! ,, 1'0 :1 Ii i l _j_ •) . -------------------------------------------------$TRAZZMA · --~-, studic;,,,.. @ ·--·-=-= --1 111,.--~..1 L---"""'"'--dl ,!I :.."'::".=--= __ __o_o a o o o · ________ Planni~g 0~: ___ _ 0 0 0 0 § 0 . FEB 1 9 2013 ~888 B 8: · •ago 000,, """'"""' "o O ODD:~ _....,=_.....,......_®_• ___,-'I ~o_o I a _=::T_'.:' Ji ------fRi~{;-~" Q ""' +"'"'"'-' ----------.;;;,;;.;.;;;;;.~~--------~-~ ! I I 1 j I • I I 1 j I • I I I j I , ., I / 000000000000 . AMERICAN OOOOOCXJOOOOO LE~~~ AUCTION CENra\ ·-· 200 $W341h SlrHt Renton WA 93057 ~~, 15~~-~ ~' O<EY~ ~; ====;;;;t==»-i;:\ditlflllmlftfH"f---'s::-~~ ~E,' __ _ i"'iciL! -' -.r .. ' D = =ii PRO.ECT NUMBER ... ..,. 12305.01 LI' ' ! • ~.r:,.orr-= Ir i', S10RT CO RT ! I ', ' AREA ! L I '· I I ) I , , ' / I '~ : I I' I I j ', , _.., .. p l i ', ! I ' ' ~ --~--==---==-=== =------j __ ' -----------l-- I ' I / ; '~:f== L~ 910::T CCWTENTS LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN I l I -:..:..-::-1 0 • , G) , 1 · LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN ! EB ""-AI..Ec.,...,..... N . ~ ., ... i lb l 9£a """"' A101 I i i =''j======+=========-1 studi~ m -=1 I I i j--------------------------;---------------------------t-------------ell.:. I I ----------------------0 i i i i i i L-------------------------L-----i i i i i i i i __________________ j_ ________ > I---------~I ~ -------------------i -,a-·--------------------------0 i 4 =*H . ·® -----------------------t---------------·. : @ ------------------f-----------------------0 i i ·-------------------------- ! ! i . , I I i ! :--------------------------+--------------------------+----------------------. -------------------- ! I I I I?.';;, ·-· I . . . -~ -I l I ,"'""__...,,.,,_._ ,,~--"""'• • i j j 1 ! 0000!!00000!]0000 ! - ~ i i i i '-vvvv1tll:laJ!J''wv0-1 , --------------------r----------------· -ooocf oOQOO 0000- i i i ., i i . -----------------------0 ----------------------0 i i i i--------------------------+--------------------------+-------------------~.t------------------------0 i i i i i i i i i : ~ ~ »< '~ ~ i . i i i i i i . City of Rentoin ! i i ! Planning Divisio~ l · I I . ! ! i i ! _ _!<_""'-""--a_-Ff s I , ,--------------0 c:::::i --uog ' !9 A !I lL~ ,wrr, ~! -rr 'I' '-=i~ !l :...-==::-=== m,, AMERICAN LEGEND CO-OP RENOVATIONS & AUCTION CENTER; 200 SW 34th Street --- STAMP YI)~-~ ""~ f"i c::::I:b ! • ., PRQ..£CT NUMBER 12305.01 ISSllll ftR 11,0.'JEa fflMt"llFDflfl!T.lll2lll SHEET COIITNTS i i j ! FEB 1 9 ZOU i L I I . I · I Ii i I & 4 """~""" ic6 ~ ~ ~~cc~~~~]!;/) G)'.EVEL:Flcx:.RPLA: _:_ ·EB A102 CEVEU FLOOR PLAN I l ' i ! ll!i!l:11 ~ i I'll' • !I ! 1'!! ~ ~ll"l~!il Q~ t ~lf!lhl i plri·. •111: r ~ 1-!1 ij ~ 'liiilli i l1!'!'l! •! Ii 1i :i ~! i •ii jl 1 lj ii ! J I ~ I li1i.:!Jllf l 1 !I I· .1o,q1 i• p 'I : Pi; t,, f •,ff I l I i I 11 I I ' •. ;: : ! I J 1•; I H ',1 l I' I d,Q) lJ () lfifiJ ~ lfifiJ = ~ lQ] ..., ~~ n, co :::, .... -· 0 "" is -,, .._. 0 :0 c:;, ~ ;:;· Cl) iii' ::, -· .... 0 0 :::, ::, DIETAILB AMERICAN LEl3END CC•CP BUILDIN& ADDITION PLANS •ODDW.4THDT Orn' o, lf•l•ITTJI,/ WA.DHIH•TOH ' I; 11 11 I 11 '' I 'f Ii ,1 tjt' I ;;;!!·) ~ii ! : L. i, :~ : i !' p ,! ! i,ii .,,I !~/. -r'T'" ;i~ \; '!1 ,·1 i " tj '""···' ·--, I ') I ·,J ' I l ' ' -·~ J I I ;: ______ L ~J __ " z m • ! • ..::. ...... '''".~- ! • i ' 1 '. ! ~ 1J (") I I ffi I ' -r, g~ I I (0) ,,, a:, ::, I ffi .... -· 0 I = <C> <5 ..... I ~ -o::O ·I·. = <' (I) ffi t:.: ' en· :i I 1··. -· .... fg 0 0 ::, :i I I i i I 1$ SANITARY B1£Wl£R A WATJ!'R PLAN -Mtt -~ ~ ~ AMERICAN I.El3END CCJ•CJP ~ ' ' • BUILD/NIii ADDITION PL.A.NS ~ ~ . a aao ow •4TH ar DITY DI" R•NTDN WAOHINIITDN -~'"..::.=t,;.;z,..;."J:.:=-\tll- ! • i ! ,, ', l • i, • • !!, ]!' ' ! ' ] BTDRlttlWAT~R QDNTROL AND aR.ADINa PLAN AMERICAN LEGEND CD•CIP BUILDINa ADDITION PLANS aoo ow a4'f'H or WA.HIHaTDH l: ' ,, --- ' '" ,'o. '- ·,"<=- " " " ~ " ~ • ~ ; i • • ~ • = ""' • ~ ~ ~ z m . ----- I • i I "T\ ,.,., a, .... "' -'"] I ''"-----,.,y;,~ I 1r iic(:;;[ b ___ p .. t,.;. I _ 111· "' ... t 1: I TllBD PLAN, NOT1£B 6, DtrTAIL.S i AMERICAN LEGIEND C:D•CJP ~ BUIL.OINO ADDITION PLANS •oa ow a4T'H OT OITY a, RllHTOH WA.OHIHaTDH 111 ., I" 1• • I a • p i • • ~ • • • • ~ ~ ~ i!!ll!l~, i! i!!vJ= • m , 1 ·1 · c C: 1:':' .. ,.,,.,u-·-·-,,_, _____ ,,,__ "O C) ru ;:;.: :, '< :, -. 0 c5 .... 0 ::x:, ~-Cl) iii' .::, -..... g 0 .::, $ talENIERAL NDTIEB -_,.. .,. i AMERICAN LEl3END CCl•CIP BUILDINDI ADDITlt:JN PLANS aaa aw • .,.TH DT DITY a, RCHTON WA.aHINaTCN Jg m fi m = ~ m g ! • i ! ,., rn CD -"" ~ = ~ l!!i!l:11 !1il!l!i1 :!1:111!1 I ,11.,1. ,;1,•r1i r11l 111 1It·1:, 111!11111 11!'!'11 ' I ~ n ~ ~ ! ~ ~ t OOI ...... "' (D !11°1 !llj'i 1111; I ~~ nus , I! I e ••·iii i,:1 I e 1~i!lp ,~ ~i1aa=1 ~ n • j n 0 ~ I I I~ "lJ -· ~~ ·"~ ~ .. ·r a ~ ru .+ &t•I~~: :, '< -cCI). :C j li : ~ jlllll ! ~l11;t t :, ·,a.1a --0 11 i ~ 1Ml!l MIP :, ..... i 0~ (0 '0 i 1111, i !111i 0 JJ • 0 • . ~· iiil'il' <" (1) I ti: cii" :, ~ ·~ -· -0 0 . ·~ :, :, ~ & • i n r11 1 i 11 11 '., ~' 1111 1 1 I I , , -! I I 0 1101,1111111 ,, I 'II' I 11 il[ 111[ 111 q 11111 111 i~Hi I· 11 I j : : i / , l I •p•.;•uoc ~HfHHH;!~!lli'. ·•n·•Q! i lj j ! i I I 1 t ilp111111m111111mu111111 ;p11pm1p11,1, 11111m1.1 i ·LIi! 1"' n 11111 I' ''I 1-1111'111 1;r11 1111 ii rl 0 ! ! u O • ! !I I I •. I ~ § ji I l I = ~ o!'llrnoo:,\o••••.,8· r .... ll!'l ... ., .... ,1 .... IGJl!JDDh•I~ I 111111 11;11p1 pill pw11p11 1 m! p 1111• ·11 •1! ! !d •I h'! 1p• i! I ~ 1ti ! ! ~ ,l • I~ DDV/£R SHlrlrT -Mff ~ AME:RICAN LE:131!:ND CD·DP BUit.DiN& ADDITIDN PL.A.NB aoa ow :11J1TH OT Ol'TY or RICNTDH WAOHIHaTOH 1:4,. ~I z - l .L..: .../'- s !; I - y . ' i~ ' I • ~ ..,f'1 ' " b -;;;-f----.I . f<"h _:,.e~' -l!!I '! '! iilv' j. j. ~ : 'l'I ' .. _ .... ~ .. ,~ /., .:;,:; .. , -::• J : -, I I • i' ALTA ANO TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AMERICAN LEGEND COOPERATIVE 200 SW 29TH ST. & 200 SW J4TH ST. ' -r=i i=~~• : !/Ii ,f. 'ii~ i;: . •:( ~ BUSH, ROED I: HITCHINGS, INC • E= Cl""L (NC,NHRS & LAAD SUR"'l:¥0R5 LIW:. ~ .. SEE-811.0W. .. -.. I I I I I l l l I i I I I I I ,, I :11 lb1 r • I ., EXIST. WAREHOUSEi TO REIU.IN S{)~ Ce=es::•· @i 2--ISC ~ 11 · 11 11 U II mn!, II II II II II 11 11 11 11 istudi'=,_ EXIST. OFFICE SPACES TOBE RENOVATED PARCEL B SP 063-090 FFE=24.90 ~ ~ ~ EXIST. WAREHOUSE: TO REMAIN PPTE = 50.1± BLDG HT. 0 THIS POINT = 27. 7± =1 '= AMERICAN LEGEND CO-OP RENOVATIONS & AUCTION CENTER 200 SW 341h Slreet Renton WA 98057 ,,_ YhJ~-~ "" "" i;i ci:i:::i • • • ., PROLCT NUMBER 12305.01 l!SO'tl> GA:Ec mn•nowm 91E£l CCNTUfl'S .........___... t' ttl IJ ENLARGEO J CB RIM 19.86 SITEPLAN J CLF IS 0.3' E OF CB RIM 19.91 (DENLARGEDSITEPl.AN ~ SHEETNUMB[R I 1 IC,!Uc, .. ,r ' • • • IF;l f?nl\ n = AS102 I G3-19 T23N RSE W 1/2 --· ---·--··· ., -· ··! ] ! .. i------.....u.r ____ ._...:"'...:"'"...:"::....... RC RC ·--'"··---···------"··---···· . ., l ' ' ' ' ,,, ....... · ...... -· .... / ' IL r 'i ;1 I. \[ IM I I:;'" ,, ·, ., ' " a ;( • '"'·"},,--..---J S IY/r'--i R-1 ' : I ii f;)"; I ;t-----..,.lll !: .. :1---·-~:.:::_ ::::; ___ ;:;:.i ===!r;H-. ~-f.-: ---4;--··:. ~ ~ : -·I <( I ii i / / ' ~ :!{ .--L Q I ii .. /:7: ,~ ~ i . , IL ) IL i---·tt en .. ··-·· i:tl I_ ·I II V // II I/// 1~; ""'vv •..;r11Tn :i j I I ... IH , ,./ ---·J I IL /, _ ..... ·· RC ' \/ / I ... 1M··--···--········- / ! City oi Re, 01 Pia··-·· · . nnin Orv, ion -· ····-I FEB 9 LUI ·--------·-N / \ , I IL .,_ I l i-===··=1-· 1,1"'··=·--=-·=···-=··=--=" ....;· =-l IM IM ', ... :.:..-·-·-·-~~.: ... =···· ,----' CA , __ .., .. .,,,: • •P-1 '~~Dl~ t ZONING MAP BOOK PW TECHNICAL SERVICES PRINTED ON 11/13/09 1th""'~""'''~• r~..,. ,.,,,...., • ...,~..,, ,.....,.. .. o,.,.,..,,.,,,.,.,-.,r,<1h"""4'"' ........ ,.,,,.._ .... ._ .. ut ........ ,,,_. 1>,,_._....woo,,-..,.pa._,_ j 13 -31 T23N RSE W 1/2 {J AMERICAN LEGEND RENOVATION &AUCTIONIBI3 Neighborhood Detail Map 0 200 ' 00 30 T23N R5E W 1/2 I l I !Feet 1:4,BOO 5330 STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Ren.ton. Reporter 0 weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of aeral circulation and is now and has been for more than six months µrior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on March 29, 2013. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is sum of $87.50. ~/;???~ 'tinda M. Mills Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter Subscribed and sworn to me this 29th day of March, 2013. -~ e.&u,,,,,,~ hleen C. Sherman, Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Buckley, Washington _.,-."'~\.~\\\W{/1111 ~ '.~~·G. S,-,. ,,, :§" '::v<i;). ,,,,"'"\\\\\111 ~~ ,,,, ff ,.J:.' /;,'f>\ON ~,!_1111 ;,, ,,, -,.... :~~ -c'A ..,'° ,;'?.. 1 ~q;:ff~ O' ~J-'1,~,~~ ~ ~~o ~ ~~;.-~ ~ ~o -• -U>~ ~ ~ ~ § ~ ~ ~ AU ,c, := z ~ ~ cJ'I "', 9\,: =o ::: t, > 111 4-19 ,1o ~,:;_ : '/1 -</ 111 • ~-r.. - 1 11 )-1$' II\\\\'"''''''' ~v ff '''1111 OF w,,..s'<'_:~.§" . \\\\\\\\\,,,,,,, l<OTICEOF EN\'IRON;\IENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONI\IENTAL REVIEW COMMITffE R•:NTON, \\~\SIIINGTO~ The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Dctcnni- nation of Non-Significance Miti- gated (DNS-M) for the following project under the authority of the Renton municipal code. American Legend Renovations & Auction Center LUA I 3-000205 Location: 200 SW 34th St. The applicant is requesting En- vironmcnral (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Development Review in order to construct a two-story 9.400 square foot oflice addition to an existing warehouse occu- pied by American Legend Co-op. Appeals of the D~S-.\1 must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on April 12, 2013. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required foe with: Hearing Examiner c/o City Clerk. Citv of Renton. 1055 S Grady Wa),, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Hearing Examiner arc governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be ob1ained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, 425-430-6510. Pub] ished in the Renton Reporter on March 29. 2013 #759035. , CITY OF RENTON . "' DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: May 2, 2013 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. ,--.-·------------____ -····-:;;:--:.----=.-::-_--_----___ -_ ------·--------------::~=----..:-=:.=_.-...:;:: ___ ;:;_::;..::::_-::_~_.-_c-_:;._-=--=-1· , Project Name: American Legend Renovations & Auction Center !' :; LUA (file) Number: LUA-13-000205, ECF, SA-A ' Cross-References: ,j AKA's: Rocale Timmons :, Project Manager: 1------------------------------------ " 'I Acceptance Date: March 1, 2013 ·------------------------------------, " 'I ;I Applicant: Melanie Pakingan :' Owner: American Legend Cooperative :1 1 1 1 Contact: Same as applicant i l~-----------------------------------,.'I I' PID Number: 125380040 :------------------------------------' \I i ERC Approval Date: March 25, 2013 \ ERC Appeal Date: April 12, 2013 , __ .....c_.;__ ________ _:__.....c_ ____________________ ...J:1 ii Administrative Approval: March 27, 2013 ' 'i Appeal Period Ends: April 12, 2013 1! Public Hearing Date: :i Date Appealed to HEX: ,. ' :. By Whom: :1 ' :,\ ,· HEX Decision: Date: 1'-: -----------------------------------,1 ii Date Appealed to Council: 1: By Whom: ,I 1: Council Decision: Date: I ': Mylar Recording Number: . :i 1 Project Description: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative : , Site Plan Development Review in order to construct a two-story 9,400 square foot office addition to i' :1 an existing warehouse occupied by American Legend Co-op. 1 ,. i: Location: 200 SW 34'" Street II Comments: ' Ii l\_========== :I i ~=====-J Qenis Law _: ·Mayor .. . May 2, 2013 . .. _ ... ·_ Mel~~ie Pakingan . . Studio Meng Strazzara . . .. 2001 Western Avenue· #200 . . ·., •• Seattle, WA 9812i ··. ~ . . . . ., . Department of Community.and_ Ec.onomic Developme~t · . · · ' · · · · · C.E."Chip"Vincent/Admiriistrator • :-.:.· , SUBJECT: . Amerii:ari Legend Renovations & Auctidn Center . LUA13-000205, ECF; SA~A . . . . . . . . Dear Ms. Pakingan: . . This lett'er is tci inform you that the appeal ·period encjeq April 12, 2013 for the Environmental (SEPA) Th.reshold Determination and Administrative Site De\telopmentPl~n Review ~ppfoVal'. 'No • appe~ls we refiled; therefore, this decisio~ is final and apfilicatiori for the ~ppn;,prlately tequ_ired . . p~rmits may proceed:' . . . . ' ' The mitigation measures, conditio~s of approval, and advisory notes (copy enclosed) listed in the . City ofReritori -Report _an_d Decision d~·ted Marcl:i 25, 2013 must.be adhered to during construction . . and prior to final inspectiori'. Furthermore, the Administrative Site Development Plan}e~iew ,. decision will expire two (2) years from the date of decision. If you are unable to firia1izethe . · development within the two~year time-frame, a single tv'.io (2)year ~xtensimi m~y be requested in ; writing; pursuant toRMC _4-9,200, .· ..• . · In regards tothe vesting of the above· referenced project, please be:iaware that as iong as the . . . ·· d~velopmeilt of the project conforms to the approved pla~s a'nd building permits are submitted .. ~ithin the.(elevan't time limits; the zoning r~gulations in effect _at the time-of the originalapprDval .. shall continue to apply. However; all construction shall-conform t_o tli_e lhternatio.nal Building Code . 'and U~iforrn Fire Code regulation; in for~e at.the time of building pe~mit application. . . . . . ' . . . ~ . • ' . ' ' . fi . If you have any questions regarding the report and decision. issued for this site plan development . proposal; pi ease call me at (425) 430-7314.: : . . . . . . ·. . . . . .·. . ·. . .. ,· . . . . . . . . . '. Sirii:erely, -~·-. ·._ ~- sa Dolb . . -,·, · Planner · · Renton City Hall • ·1055 South Grady Way , Renton,Washington.98057 • r~ntonwa.gov·-. -. ' . . . tQ King County Wastewater Treatment Division Community Services and Environmental Planning King Street Center, KSC-NR-0505 201 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104-3855 April 2, 2013 Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE: LUA13-000205, ECF, SA-A Dear Ms. Timmons: 0 ~ ~ei'\ton C \'<.Y . o· vision r>lafll'll!\9 ' t,,~R CS 1~'3 The King County Wastewater Treatment Division has reviewed the document Notice of Environmental Determination and Issuance of a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated (DNS-M) dated March 27, 2013, for the proposal construct a two-story 9,400 square foot office addition to an existing 200,000 square foot warehouse occupied by American Legend. King County requires that a capacity charge be applied to any project that constructs a new connection to the sewer system, any reconnection within five years of a disconnection, or any change in use or building remodel that includes an increase in plumbing fixtures. King County generally receives notice of new construction; however, some sewer districts and/or the cities that represent them have neglected to report changes in use and tenant improvements that involve an increase in plumbing fixtures. In an attempt to remedy this problem, we are sending this reminder to you in response to the Notice of Application with Optional Determination of Non-significance. We ask that you forward this reminder to the sewer district or city department responsible for Sewer Use Certification forms: Please complete and send a Non-Residential Sewer Use Certification form for the above project to the King County Capacity Charge Program in a timely manner. The form should be sent to Ericka Stewart, Capacity Charge Program, KSC-NR-0502, at the address above. If you need additional forms or have questions about the program, please call Ericka at 206-684-1060. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. Sincerely, v~~~r~ Water Quality Planner I Community Services and Environmental Planning cc: Ericka Stewart, Project Manager, Capacity Charge Program CREATING RESOURCES FROM WASTEWATER OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE. MITIGATI;D (ONS·M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Am1rlt1n L111nd Renov•tlon, & Auction C.nt,r PROJECT NUMIER: LUAU-000205, £0', SA..-. LOCATIOH: 2DDSWM'"Strul OESC!I.IPTION; Tht •ppllt1nl 11 r.qu11tlna: EIWlranm•ntal (SEPA) R1vl1w 1nd Admlnlrtr1IIY1 Sit• Pl1n Dnelopmen1 R, .. _ In ord1r lo conrtrll(! • rw-..,y t,400 1qu1r1 foal offlt1 1dd)&,n u, 1n .-1,t1111 w1r1houH <>=pied by Am,rlcan Le11nd. Th• 1xl1tln1 w1r1houn IJ 1ppro,ilmll1lv 200,000 1qu1r1 Iott Jn ,111. TM 1ppllc1nt 11 prapo11nt the ••IN'Nlon prlmully ,Iona: the-.,,., b?d• In addition to the reconflp..tlllfl of ln11rlo, SJIIU 10 .«<>mmodat1 luwr1 M"h for tht nm, uH. The 1ubJ1ct property II located betw11n SW 34th St ind SW 19th St Jurt wort al fut ValltV Rd, 11 200 SW 34th SL The prajod 11!1 ,onllm al two plmli lotanna: ,.11 ac:11 Jn 1re1 and Is louted within th• 1111\"f ll'lllu1tr1,1 /Ill) ,one. There er• no ,rltkal 1reu c,n sit,. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAi. REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION OOH NOT HAY! A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appnlt of th• 1nvlronment1l dtt1nnln11tlon mutt be flied In wrltlnr on or b1for1 5:00 p.m. on April 12, 2013, to11thar with the requl11d IH with: Hearlnr Eumlnar, City of Renton, 1055 South Gr11dy Way, Renton, WA 980S7. App11IJ to th1 b1mln,r 1r1 conrnltd by City of RMC 4--1-110 •nd lnfonn1tlon reprdln1 the 1ppe1J proce11 may b1 obt1lnltd from th, Renton City Cl,rk'1 Office, J425) 430-6510. If THE ENVIRONMENTAL OETHMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET ANO All PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHEM:2i~fJiNe!c5~~~~o~E~~~EE~'i1?~4~WW~:7%~~RTMENToF DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. CERTIFICATION I, +~'---""::.i..,"'--f.!=:.::-'__:_.:.:::.-'-"~ hereby certify that 3:, copies of the above document were posted in conspicuous places or nearby the described property on Date: ~ ~ J;fa t>/ 3 STATE OF w't.sH1NGTON } Signe~--=:::::::-------- ) ss COUNlY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that '.fk ,a.R, 1:}".)c 1ooa• S: signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 013 1j ,A ~Ja'A Notary Public in~d for the State of Washington Notary ( Print):_-1..!.µ-'-'' A=---"(;.::..:.'-"'~='-'{ _____ _ My a ppoi ntm ent expires : __ Al..L.I!· ""lj-""-;.:.S'.:!.'~--=..)_..:.',_,, 7 ,.....::d'-'o,8-"""'------ • CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT-PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 27th day of March, 2013, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Agencies See Attached Melanie Pakingan Contact American Legen Cooperative Owner/Applicant _/k~ ., m~ "'''""'""'•• (Signature of Sender): .,, , ~ _ .. -,,,, _.... ,, -u ff .\;1~~t'l~··:,,,, ,,,~ f J::'[ 01,P.R~ • ~ ~ i a .-/1.~ ) ) 55 STATE OF WASHINGTON -~r; ~'\ ~ ::; ,: .. (I !~~ COUNTY OF KING ) ~ \-, PuQ~ ~j C, j . ~ \ --~·..-,\>-,,. ... ,,,,, 8·.. "' -~ = 'I. .,,.,._ ,., ~, ..... ~-- I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker 1111 ,qhfp,""""" '6'&9'"" £ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntar~l!Vjt Pi'iie~'§ and purposes I\ I\\\\\\\'< mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 112@d 2 2 1 J?J I "2 I V Notary Pubttn and for the State of Washington Nata ry (Print): ____ _.li!..L.· .c.AL-a....1.G:t:·o.Ki:.1.., .. h,.e~.r:.._ ____________ _ My appointment expires: ~ 1,;-,/-· (}_ qr ;),,Ol3 Project'Name: American Legend Renovations & Auction Center Project Number: LUA13-000205, ECF, SA-A template -affidavit of service by mailing ' ..• Dept. of Ecology ** Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region • Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers • Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher• 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 Ouwamish Tribal Office• 4717 W Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA 98106-1S14 KC Wastewater Treatment Division • Environmental Planning Supervisor Ms. Shirley Marroquin 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 City of Newcastle Attn: Steve Roberge Director of Community Development 13020 Newcastle Way Newcastle, WA 98059 Puget Sound Energy Municipal Liaison Manager Joe Jainga PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01 W Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. • Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 39015 -172°d Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program• Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015 172°' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* Attn: Gretchen Kaehler PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Kent Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Acting Community Dev. Director 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 City of Tukwila Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. ••oepartment of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov template -affidavit of service by mailing • CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 27th day of March, 2013, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Agencies See Attached William M. Grosz Party of Record Bert G. Richards Party of Record Mark Watkins Party of Record Terry Wilson Contact Daniel Jassen & Barak Levy Owners Larry Jassen Applicant (Signature of Sender): ~ ,,,. ~ ~"""''''11 11 I,: STATE OF WASHINGTON : , fr .aY \ 0 ~ = G~-"' lll1111te8 '~,, i! ~ -~-,.,... ~-z )55 ~lo,,..,"~ ~ ·:::: • u :i="'" COUNTY OF KING ) ~ ]::: \ 0 " ' ,.:; ;?J l E ~ \,-> p\) r,_<:/i f l = ~ ,, , ..... ~,... = I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker ,,,, ;•111,""'""'; ~ .$'.:: signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and volun{!lr1t 17c'llrcJr g;~~s and purposes 111111 ·~'''" mentioned in the instrument. 1~' Dated: Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print): __ -"!-f.,_,_A..._.,.__,fi:..w..G ... a.N='l'<---------------- My appointment expires: ~v-6"+--,x,''t aaj Project Name: Jassen Short Plat Project Number: LUA12-045, ECF, SH PL-A template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology•• Environmental Review Section PO Box47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region • Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers • Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers • Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 AGENCY (DOE) LETIER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher* 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 Duwamish Tribal Office • 4717 W Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA 98106-1514 KC Wastewater Treatment Division • Environmental Planning Supervisor Ms. Shirley Marroquin 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 City of Newcastle Attn: Steve Roberge Director of Community Development 13020 Newcastle Way Newcastle, WA 98059 Puget Sound Energy Municipal Liaison Manager Joe Jainga PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01 W Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. * Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 39015 -172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program• Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation• Attn: Gretchen Kaehler PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Kent Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Acting Community Dev. Director 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 City of Tukwila Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 •Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. ••oepartment of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov template -affidavit of service by mailing OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: American Legend Renovations & Auction Center PROJECT NUMBER: LUA13-000205, ECF, SA-A LOCATION: 200 SW 34th Street DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Development Review In order to construct a two-story 9,400 square foot office addition to an existing warehouse occupied by American Legend. The existing warehouse is approximately 200,000 square feet in size. The applicant is proposing the expansion pr[marlly along the western fa~ade in addition to the reconfiguration of interior space to accommodate future needs for the same use. The subject property is located between SW 34th St and SW 29th St Just west of East Valley Rd, at 200 SW 34th St. The project site consists of two parcels totaling 9.11 acres In area and Is located within the Heavy Industrial {IH) zone. There are no critical areas on site. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on April 12, 2013, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING Will BE SET AND All PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION II PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. ii Denis Law Mayo_r March· 27 _2013 __ • Department of Community_and Economic De~elopment. _· · · -·. · · · C.E."Chip"Vl~cent, AdminisHator-. • . Melanie Pakingan. Studio [vleng Strazzara · · 2001 Western Avenue #200 • Seattle>WA98121 . . SUBJECT: _-ENVIRbNMENtiL (SEPA)THRESHOLD DETERMINATiON _- . American Legend Rencivaticins & Auction Center, LUA13-00020S, ECF, SA-A_ -.. ' .. ' •' ' . ' . . . ' ' •. bear rvis'. Pakingan:, · This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Comrnittee'(ERC) to a'dvise. . you that th~y ha~e completed their review of the ~ubjett projeiiand have issued a ... 'thceshold Determination of Nqn-Significance-Mitigateci with MjtigatioA Measures .. . Please referto.th~ enclosed ER( Repor;t; fora iiitofthe Mitigation M~a;Lires: ·.. . . ' . . ' -. -. . . . . . ·.• .. . . .·. . . . . App·iials of the environmel)tal de.termination ·must be filed in writing .9n or before 5:00 p;m. on Aprji'12, 2013, t~gether with the r~qUired fee with: Hearing Exaniiner, City 0 0J ' Renton, 10!;i5So~th Grady Way, Renton; WA 9_8057: Appeals to t,he Exami~er:ar'e --·. ; governed by_RMC 4-8.-110 and infbrmationregarding the.appeal process may be , -obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425 )430~5510: .--. -. ,• . . . . . . . . . If th~ Environrn'erital Determination is appealed, a public'hearing d~te will be set and all . parties notified. l_f yci~ have any-further q4esticins, ple~se 0 call ~e at (425) 430-7219 .. ; ,. . ' ' . . ... ' ., ' . ~r:;;J:::.::/;uee, · . .• •. ~oc;Jeri~m~ns .• -•. -__ .. -.-'_-_ --.. ·.· •. - ' Senior Planner. · · ·. ·Enclosure · cc:· . Americiln Lege~~'Co~peiatiVe ;'owner(S) ·,. . : _, . . ' . -· · . Rent~n City Hall·.· 1055 South Grady Way -. Renton, Washington 98057 • .renton_wa.gov . . . ' . . . . .:.. . '.- ~.' . . ~ r '. Denis Law Mayor March 27, 2013 Department of Community and Economic Development C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPAi THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on March 25, 2013: SEPA DETERMINATION: Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated (DNSM) PROJECT NAME: American Legend Renovations & Auction Center PROJECT NUMBER: LUA13-000205, ECF, SA-A Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on April 12, 2013, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) .430-6510. Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, tj~~ Senior Planner Enclosure cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Boyd Powers, Dep"artment of Natural Resources Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, NW Region Larry Fisher, WDFW Duwamish Tribal Office US Army Corp. of Engineers Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNSM) MITIGATION MEASURES, ADVISORY NOTES, AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA13-000205, ECF, SA-A Melanie Pakingan, Studio Meng Strazzara American Legend Renovations & Auction Center PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Development Review in order to construct a two-story 9,400 square foot office addition to an existing warehouse occupied by American Legend. PROJECT LOCATION: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 200 SW 34th Street The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1. All earthwork performed, implemented by the applicant, shall be consistent with the recommendations of the geotechnical report, prepared by PanGeo Incorporated, dated February 14, 2013. ADIVISORY NOTES: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes ore provided os information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the fond use actions. Planning: 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 3. Commercial, multi-family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 4. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to final occupancy permits. Water: 1. A Double Check Valve Assembly (DCVA) will be required to be installed inline of the domestic water to the building. 2. The existing 8-inch DCVA for the fire sprinkler system does not meet current code. It will need to be removed and replaced with a Double Detector Check Valve Assembly (DDCVA). 3. If the new addition exceeds 30 feet in height, a reduced pressure backflow assembly (RPBA) will be required. 4. A water system development fee is owed if the size of the existing domestic water meter or fire line is increased. Fee is payable prior to issuance of the building permit. Sewer. 1. Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges are based on the size of the domestic water meter. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. Surface Water: 1. A surface water system development fee of $0.448 per square foot of new impervious surface may apply. This is payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. 2. A preliminary drainage plan and drainage report has been submitted with the site plan application. The report addresses compliance with the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual. After a cursory review of the TIR, the engineer has stated the project is exempt from flow control (Core Requirement #3) and water quality (Core Requirement #8). 3. An erosion control plan will be required to be submitted with the building permit application. Transportation: 1. The transportation impact fee for the 9,400 addition is calculated at $0.84 per square foot. The fee is estimated at $7,802.00 which would be due with the building permit. Police 1. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer ERC Mitigation Measures, Advisory Notes, and Conditions of Approval Page 2 of 4 should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2" throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. 2. All exterior doors should be made of solid metal or metal over wood, with heavy-duty deadbolt locks, latch guards or pry-resistant cylinders around the locks, and peepholes. If glass doors are used, they should be fitted with the hardware described above and additionally be fitted with a layer of security film. Security film can increase the strength of the glass by up to 300%, greatly reducing the likelihood of breaking glass to gain entry. Access to the back of the buildings should be limited, preferably with security fencing, as these areas could be vulnerable to crime due to the lack of natural surveillance by business customers or tenants. Fire: 1. The fire flow requirements and the fire hydrant requirements will not change with the proposed additions. Sufficient fire flow exists at the site presently and sufficient fire hydrants are also existing. The existing fire hydrants will need to be fitted with 5-inch storz fittings if they presently do not have them which is unlikely. 2. Approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems are required throughout the building. Separate plans and permits are required by the fire department. The fire alarm system shall be fully addressable and full detection is required. If the occupant loading exceeds 1,000 persons then a voice-type system is required. The fire alarm system shall cover the entire building, both new and existing. 3. Fire department apparatus access roadways are required to be maintained with proper fire lane signage. Required turning radius are 25-feet inside and 45-feet outside. Roadways shall be a minimum of 20-feet wide. 4. If an elevator is installed, it shall meet the minimum requirements for a bariatric sized ambulance stretcher of 40-inches by 84-inches. 5. An automated external defibrillator (AED) is required for all assembly type occupancies over 300 persons. General: 1. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two horizontal and vertical controls per the City's current horizontal and vertical control network. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The applicant shall comply with the 1 mitigation measure issued as part of the Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated, dated March 25, 2013 (Exhibit 5). ERC Mitigation Measures, Advisory Notes, and Conditions of Approval Page 3 of 4 2. The applicant shall submit a revised landscaping analysis noting compliance with the 35 square feet of landscaping, per parking space. The revised landscaping analysis shall be submitted to the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval. 3. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan depicting adequate square footage for the refuse and recycling deposit area. The revised site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior t.o final occupancy. 4. The applicant shall revise the site plan to comply with the bicycle requirements outlined in RMC 4-4-080F.11 with the inclusion of 19 bicycle parking stalls. The revised site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval. ERC Mitigation Measures, Advisory Notes, and Conditions of Approval Page4of4 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: -MITIGATED (DNS-M) LUAB-000205, ECF, SA-A Melanie Pakingan, Studio Meng Strazzara American Legend Renovations & Auction Center PROJECT DESCRIPTION: T.he applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Development Review in order to construct a two-story 9,400 square foot office addition to an existing warehouse occupied by American Legend. PROJECT LOCATION: LEAD AGENCY: 200 SW 34th Street City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-9-0700 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on April 12, 2013. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: ""~?);,;Ji/~~- Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator Public Works Department Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Community Services Department March 29, 2013 March 25, 2013 Date Date Mark Peterson, dministrator Fire & Emergency Services C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator Department of Community & Economic Development Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE REPORT AND ADMINISTRATIVE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REPORT & DECISION ERC MEETING DATE: Project Nome: Owner: Applicant/Contact: File Number: Project Manager: Project Summary: Project location: Site Area: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: March 25, 2013 American Legend Renovations & Auction Center American Legend Cooperative; 200 SW 34th St; Renton, WA 98057 Melanie Pakingan; Studio Meng Strazzara; 2001 Western Ave, Suite 200; Seattle, WA 98121 LUAB-000205, ECF, SA-A Roca le Timmons, Senior Planner The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Development Review in order to construct a two-story 9,400 square foot office addition to an existing warehouse occupied by American Legend. The existing warehouse is approximately 200,000 square feet in size. The applicant is proposing the expansion primarily along the western fa~ade in addition to the reconfiguration of interior space to accommodate future needs for the same use. The subject property is located between SW 34th St and SW 29th St just west of East Valley Rd, at 200 SW 34th St. The project site consists of two parcels totaling 9.11 acres in area and is located within the Heavy Industrial (IH) zone. There are no critical areas on site. 200 SW 34th Street 396,839 SF (9.11 acres) Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated (DNS-M). Project Location Map ERC and Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development AMERICAN LEGEND RENOVATIONS & AUCTION CENTER Report of March 25, 2013 ' A. EXHIBITS: Environmental Review Committee & Administrative Site Pion Report LUA13-00020S, SA-A, ECF Page 2 of 14 Exhibit 1: American Legend Renovations & Auction Center Site Plan Report and Decision Exhibit 2: Site Plan Exhibit 3: Landscape Plan Exhibit 4: Elevations Exhibit 5: Environmental "SEPA" Determination Exhibit 6: Technical Information Report prepared by Blueline Land Development Consulting, dated February 15, 2013 Exhibit 7: Geotechnical Report prepared by PanGeo Incorporated, dated February 14, 2013 Exhibit 8: Aerial Photograph I 8. GENERALINFORMATION: 1. Owner(s) of Record: 2. Zoning Designation: 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: a. North: Warehouse (IM zone) b. East: Warehouse (IH zone) c. South: Warehouse {IH zone) d. West: Warehouse {IH zone) 6. Site Area: 9.11 acres IC. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Comprehensive Plan N/A Zoning N/A Annexation N/A Western Distribution LUA90-063 Short Plat ERC/Site Plan Report American Legend Cooperative 200 SW 34th St Renton, WA 98057 Heavy Industrial (IH) Employment Area Valley (EAV) An approximate 200,000 square warehouse and office building occupied by American Legend which is proposed to remain. Ordinance No. Date 5099 11/01/2004 5100 11/01/2004 1745 04/19/1959 N/A 01/01/1990 City of Renton Department of Community , 1omic Development ... AMERICAN LEGEND RENOVATION~°' AUCTION CENTER Report of March 25, 2013 I D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Existing Utilities Environmental R, Committee & Admini5trative Site Plan Report LUA13-000ZOS, SA-A, ECF Page 3 of 14 a. Water: There is a domestic water meter serving the existing building. b. Sewer: There is a side sewer serving the existing building. c. Surface/Storm Water: There is a storm conveyance system in the parking lot. 2. Streets: There is sidewalk, curb, gutter, and street lighting fronting the site. 3. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts a. Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts b. Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table c. Section 4-2-130: Development Standards for Industrial Zoning Classifications 2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards 3. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards a. Section 4-6-060: Street Standards 4. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria a. Section 4-9-200: Site Plan Review 5. Chapter 11 Definitions G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element 2. Community Design Element I H. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Environmental Threshold Determination Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period. 2. Mitigation Measures 1. All earthwork performed, implemented by the ·applicant, shall be consistent with the recommendations of the geotechnical report, prepared by PanGeo Incorporated, dated February 14, 2013. 3. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community I 1omic Development AMERICAN LEGEND RENOVATION) o< AUCTION CENTER Report of March 25, 2013 Environmental R1 Committee & Administrative Site Pion Report LUA13-000Z05, SA-A, ECF Page 4 of 14 conjunction with the proposed development. Stoff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: a. Earth Impacts: The site is nearly level with an approximate slope of two percent across the site. Most of the site is currently impervious. Following development, impervious surface coverage will be approximately 95 percent which is less than a one percent increase in impervious cover. The applicant is proposing to bring in approximately 1,300 cubic yards of fill, primarily for backfill as the on site soils are not considered ideal for reuse. Exposed cover during construction would leave soils susceptible to erosion. The applicant will be required to design a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) pursuant to the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements. The applicant provided a Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by PanGeo Incorporated, dated February 14, 2013 (Exhibit 7). The Engineer visited the site and conducted two cone penetration tests (CPT's) to a maximum depth of 80 feet below the ground surface. The result of the two CPT's identified that the site is underlain by 5 to 6 feet of compacted fill which consists of very dense to dense sand. Below the fill layer a medium dense to silty sand was encountered as well as soft to stiff sandy silt to clayey silt with occasional thin clay layers. These soils extended from below the fill to the termination of the CPT's at about 80 feet below existing grade. The report stated that the groundwater table was encountered during the field exploration; at approximately 9.4 feet below grade. Fluctuations in groundwater level should be expected on a 'seasonal and annual basis. The report includes recommendations for seismic considerations, foundations, floor slabs, retaining walls, site preparation and grading, structural fill, excavations and, drainage. Therefore, staff recommends as a mitigation measure that the applicant comply with the recommendations included in the provided Geotechnical Engineering Report. Mitigation Measures: All earthwork performed, implemented by the applicant, shall be consistent with the recommendations of the geotechnical report, prepared by PanGeo Incorporated, dated February 14, 2013. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations b. Storm Water Impacts: The site is located within the Green River-Lake Washington watershed. Runoff from the north portion of the site enters into the tight lined system in the south side of SW 29th St. From there it flows west to the conveyance system on the west side of Lind Ave SW and then continues north to SW 27th St. Flows continue through the conveyance system in SW 27th St and discharge into the Black River. Runoff from the southern portion of the site enters into the tight-lined system in the north side of SW 34th St and continues west eventually discharging into the Black River as well. A preliminary drainage plan and drainage report has been submitted with the site plan application, prepared by Blueline Land Development Consulting, dated February 15, 2013 (Exhibit 6). The report addresses compliance with the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and the 2009 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWM, Chapters 1 and 2. Developed runoff flow rates would not differ from existing flows. The proposed development would be replacing approximately 0.20 acres of existing pollution generating i!11pervicius area with an equal amount of roof area resulting in a decrease of pollution generating impervious surfaces. Therefore water quality treatment would not be necessary. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended. Nexus: Not applicable. ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community ,' Jamie Development AMERICAN LEGEND RENOVATION~"' AUCTION CENTER Report of March 25, 2013 c. Transportation Environmental R1 Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report LUA13-000205, SA-A, ECF Page 5 of 14 Impacts: The site has two public street frontage, SW 34th St and SW 29th St (Principal Arterial). Access is proposed from existing curb cuts along both streets. No street improvements would be required for this project. No new trips would be generated by the proposed building additions. There is no Transportation Impact Fee required. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended. Nexus: Not applicable. 4. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or" Advisory Notes to Applicant." I. ADMINSTRATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The applicant, Studio Meng Strazzara, is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental 'SEPA' Review for the construction of a 9,400 square foot office addition to an existing 200,000 square foot warehouse/office structure occupied by American Legend. 2. The proposal also includes the interior renovations to the existing office spaces within the existing structure. 3. The expansion is being proposed in order to accommodate a semi-annual one week long auction when the buildings capacity is approximately 10 times the normal capacity. 4. The applicant is proposing an eight parking stall reduction from the existing 240 parking stalls to 232 parking stalls. 5. The existing four parking stalls for large trucks would remain. 6. The proposed addition would match the height of the existing structure at 27 feet and 5 inches at the tallest point of the flat roof. 7. The Planning Division of the City of Renton accepted the above master application for review on February 19, 2013 and determined it complete on March 1, 2012. The project complies with the 120- day review period. 8. The property is located within the Employment Area Valley (EAV) Comprehensive Plan land use designation and the Heavy Industrial (IH) zoning classification. 9. Access to the site would continue to be provided via existing curb cuts along SW 34th St and SW 29th St. 10. The site is nearly level with an approximate slope across the site of two percent. 11. The applicant is proposing the removal of two trees on site. 12. Proposed construction would occur between June 2013 and February 2014. 13. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended), on March 25, 2013, the City's Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated (Exhibit 5). A 14-day appeal period will commence on March 29, 2013 and end on April 12, 2013. 14. Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments have been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of this report. ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community l 1omic Development Environmental Rt Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report LUA13-000205, SA-A, ECF AMERICAN LEGEND RENOVATION~'" AUCTION CENTER Report of March 25, 2013 Page 6 of 14 ,/ Policy LU-304. Non-employment-based uses, such as residential, are prohibited in the Employment Area -Valley. Policy LU-305. Multi-story office uses should be located in areas most likely to be served by future multi-modal transportation opportunities. A greater emphasis on public amenities is appropriate for this type of use. Policy LU-307. Recognize viable existing and allow new industrial uses in the Valley, while promoting the gradual transition of uses on sites with good access and visibility to more intensive commercial and office use. Policy LU-317. Site plan review should be required for all new projects in the Employment Area-Valley pursuant to thresholds established in the City's development regulations. Not applicable. Setbacks: Per RMC 4-2-130A the IH zoning classification requires a minimum front yard, and side yard along-a-street, setback of 20 feet along arterials and 15 feet for all other streets. The IH zone has na rear or side yard setbacks. The addition is located approximately 390 feet from the front property line along SW 34 1 " St. The proposed addition meets the setback requirements of the zoning classification. Building Height: Per RMC 4-3-130A there is no building height requirement on the IH zone. The height of the proposed structure would be 27 feet and 5-inches at the tallest point of the flat roof, which matches the height of the existing structure (Exhibit 4). Landscaping: Per RMC 4-4-070 ten feet af on-site landscaping is required along all public street frontages, with the exception of areas for required walkways and driveways ar those projects with reduced setbacks. A conceptual landscape plan was submitted with the project application (Exhibit 3). The applicant has demonstrated existing landscaping exceeds the required 10-foot onsite landscape strip along SW 34 1" Ave. The landscape plan provided includes a proposed planting plan for new vegetation surrounding the proposed addition. The mix of vegetation and groundcover includes English daisy, ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Deportment of Community I 1omic Development AMERICAN LEGEND RENOVATION~ & AUCTION CENTER Report of March 25, 2013 Environmental R, Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report LUA13-000205, SA-A, ECF Page 7 of 14 deer fern, tufted hair grass, western sword fern, salal, and Japanese blood grass. Within the proposed surface parking lot 35 square feet of landscaping per parking space would be required. Based on the proposal for 232 surface parking stalls, a minimum of 8,120 square feet of landscaping would be required within the surface parking areas. The submitted landscape analysis does not note the square footage of landscaping provided on the interior and perimeter of the site which would mitigate impacts to adjacent properties caused by parking. Therefore, staff recommends as a condition of approval, the applicant submit a revised landscaping analysis noting compliance with the 35 square feet of landscaping per parking space requirement. The revised landscaping analysis shall be submitted to the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval. The applicant will be required to submit a final landscape plan, for review and approval by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to construction permit issuance. Refuse and Recyclables: Per RMC 4-4-090 for manufacturing and non-residential development uses require o minimum of 3 square feet per every 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area shall be provided for recyclable deposit areas and a minimum of 6 square feet per 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area shall be provided for refuse deposit areas with a total minimum area of 100 square feet. The proposed facility would be required to provide 628 square feet of recyclable deposit areas and 1,256 square feet of refuse deposit area. Square footages for deposit areas were not provided on the site plan provided. Staff recommends, as a condition of approval, the applicant submit a revised site plan depicting adequate square footage for the refuse and recycling deposit area. The revised site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval. Critical Areas: Not applicable. Parking: The parking regulations, RMC 4-4-080, require a specific number of off-street parking stalls be provided: The following rotios would be applicable to the site: Use Net Square Ratio Required Spaces Footage Office 57,348 Min: 2.0 spaces/ 1,000 SF Min: 115 Max: 4.5 spaces I 1,000 SF Max:258 Warehousing 108,357 1 space I 1,500 SF 72 Based on the use requirements a minimum of 187 to a maximum of 330 parking spaces would be allowed in order to meet code. The applicant is proposing a total of 232 spaces which falls within the allowable range. The parking conforms to the minimum requirements for drive aisle and parking stall dimensions and the provision of ADA accessible parking stalls. '1'cl,DESIG ... REGUIATIOllii'COMI! , .... , ··,. ·,,., ......... ,iGOI\IISTEN·· ~.,,.,'!'~!"'"' ., .. .., --!~iitfi~:il~j Structures: Restricting overscale structures and overconcentrotion of development on a particular portion of the site. ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community, 10mic Development AMERICAN LEGEND RENDVATIDN~ "'AUCTION CENTER Report of March 25, 2013 Environmental R, Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report LUA13-000205, SA-A, ECF Page 8 of 14 The small addition is located on the western fa~ade of an existing structure which is located in the center of the industrial lot therefore there is not a concentration of development on the site. Circulation: Providing desirable transitions ond linkages between uses, streets, walkways and adjacent properties. The site and existing use are industrial and would continue to operate in the same manner with limited pedestrian connections. The proposed expansion would not alter the pedestrian and vehicular circulation on site. Loading and Storage Areas: Locating, designing and screening storage areas, utilities, rooftop equipment, loading areas, and refuse and recyclables to minimize views from surrounding properties. The proposed expansion would not alter the existing loading and storage areas for the site. Views: Recognizing the public benefit ond desirability of mointoining visual accessibility to ottroctive natural features. There are no large attractive natural features on or near the site for which to maintain visual accessibility. The applicant has proposed to limit the height of the proposed addition to 27 feet and 5 inches to match the height of the existing structure which mitigate view impacts from surrounding properties. Landscaping: Using landscaping to provide transitions between development and surrounding properties to reduce noise and glare, maintain privacy, and generally enhance the appearance of the project. See Landscaping discussion under Findings Section 15.b. Lighting: Designing and/or placing exterior lighting and glazing in order to avoid excessive brightness or glare to adjacent properties and streets The applicant is not proposing changes to the lighting plan for the site. The existing building and proposed additions are designed as to not result in excessive brightness or glare to adjacent properties and streets. t'''i l""''""·t'·'""·"~~·--· 1• ' .,...,,-.~·-"."·tljj!W~tfir•1,·'.t!11q•r.11u,;1····~!~· ·l":1l'W'I! 'f 11~1nJ;~··' Olff·"'.f'l!'.'.\l•IW'~''i1W'IHl/"!"ll1·1·r:;~J!l!•!!'.!j1'll.'';j;f,.''.'.l'if,jl!•1"'.:i,l ,.,•.(; ,, :·i)"I," 1•,;;·1°n :I'' ",':, .. ;,r •it.On:.i, .. , i,,w ... "Cfo,jfi f o'·. ON,,.SliTilEUMPA, GTS:•j,·~~11111:1,!,ii,,1,l:1~1l~hlfi k,·,, .. , r-/l.1,·1 nJh!f1" ~!:'.,r.1·1t::::~[11'' ;h ~i'11;h 1,? 1ifi:,i·nn"l1~,~; ft,·~ mi!'1·~, . ,~1:ilf' .. :, ; I '11··:' ; :,iir,i;' .:1; "';,.' !Jti:,·,;i,.' · .. ,:.)11 ,,1:1,\:,:, .. ;1',t'~[f~:tP' • ·: 1, ,1u•:,"•it1'J '" !11':,11"fl'l"·[lll1/l''ll!!; .. ~' P111~~ ~H ·t! :r·: "'' .. r,. ,,, 1111-"• H .. ' I .:,1( ···11•1111:,,1 "' ··1 rij1.J' . '! ,•-1;, ',. 11, 1-"l 1•'i ,!1,,._. ' ,l l-;1! '! (.,I' ''"1!il ,,1., · . ,,, .. p:tr<I .1• ,i,r "'· , .. ,"!·: .:,1":!'.:n., I,;,, ,dliM\i !11 ... ,I,,• ·! m11;l., \11,lll!1!oi. l.:m l:;ttfl (!I ,I, Hl ,al ,/.•t1, t '·:il,lfo,,.t1 ... i,:\,.,1· I·, . .! llh. ,j ...... , ;!: .. L,ldt!H .... ,,.,,:,.1,1 ;:,1rl!!1 .. , ... ,;1..J. ,,•,1 .. It.,, •• • · ... , .. , 'ii --~1 l-r .•. I "' -L,u.,t1Y.u.·, .. c .. Structure Placement: Provisions for privacy and noise reduction by building placement, spacing and orientation. City staff does not anticipate any adverse impacts on surrounding properties and uses as long as the conditions of approval are complied with. All parcels immediately surrounding the subject property are zoned Medium Industrial (IM) or Heavy Industrial (IH). Surrounding uses include office buildings, warehousing and distribution facilities. Structure Scale: Consideration of the scale of proposed structures in relation to natural characteristics, views and vistas, site amenities, sunlight, prevailing winds, and pedestrian and vehicle needs. The existing building is located in the center of the site setback approximately 390 feet from SW 34th St. The 9,400 square foot addition would be located on the western fa~ade. The applicant has limited the height of the proposed additions to 27 feet and 5 inches in order to match the height of the existing structure thereby not creating additional impacts due to height. The exterior of the additions will be comprised mostly of concrete panels, storefront aluminum glazing and metal coping to match the existing structure. The scale and bulk of the facility would be virtually unchanged as viewed from the west and east as the proposed addition on the western fa~ade would maintain the same sight lines as the existing ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community, ,omic Development AMERICAN LEGEND RENOVATION~"' AUCTION CENTER Report of March 25, 2013 Environmental R1 Committee & Administrative Site Ptah Report LUA13-000Z05, SA-A, ECF Page 9 of 14 building. The scale and bulk of the facility would slightly increase, as viewed from the north and south. However, the proposal exceeds all setbacks required by code thereby mitigating the additions' impacts on neighboring uses in terms of scale and bulk. The scale, height and bulk of the proposed additions are appropriate for the site and would be architecturally compatible with the existing facility. The existing building and proposed additions are designed appropriately to allow adequate light and air circulation to the building and the site. The design of the building will not result in excessive shading of the property. In addition, there is ample area surrounding the building to provide for normal airflow. Natural Features: Protection of the natural landscape by retaining existing vegetation and soils, using topography to reduce undue cutting and filling, and limiting impervious surfaces. Topographically, the site is relatively flat. A geotechnical report for the site was submitted. Information on the water table and soil permeability with recommendations of appropriate flow control BMP options were included. The applicant is proposing to bring in approximately 1,300 cubic yards of fill, primarily for backfill as the on site soils are not considered ideal for reuse. Following construction the site would have an impervious surface cover of approximately 95 percent. landscaping: Use of landscaping to soften the appearance of parking areas, to provide shade and privacy where needed, to define and enhance open spaces, and generally ta enhance the appearance of the project. landscaping also includes the design and protection of planting areas so that they are less susceptible to damage from vehicles or pedestrian movements. There is existing landscaping around the perimeter of the site. The applicant is proposing the removal of two trees. A conceptual landscape plan was submitted with the project application (Exhibit 3). The planting plan includes new vegetation surrounding the proposed addition. The mix of vegetation and groundcover include: English daisy, deer fern, tufted hair grass, western sword fern, salal, and Japanese blood grass. The existing landscaping is used to provide a transition between the proposed development and the public right of way. The vegetation proposed would enhance screening of the facility from those properties to the west. The landscaping softens the appearance of the industrial development and generally enhances the appearance of the project. f ll\1;¥'<fE~~=1111111111111111111i~m1;11ni,ri~w11mr~ii~11111~11111111 llii!l1111m1~:11ri1'n~iii1~1rn1mir:111~111~i:111;1111ri1:im11iw1:11ir]i~i/W~1Ji1i':nJ!m1i111:1111::11,;;ij1;'11f'\l(lin:ii::~1:i iiillil dlkllU/Hl!Hl!i!1HiU!/l1i ,•Mi, Iii~ ,i !' /1 t;H/ . !mh ! ·.,., t ! 1h11 I '"" ; I:, /hi~ ii'f .J liH11!.i1~.l1:,1 IHI 11fl ;; IIJ1J,1,,J <'. . .1) In 1111.: ,1,a,1:u, .~) 1J 1,:'!11: ,..1ml1J,,~t~'\j1~.h1), u'.1::..liifili'A1.:1h.lid location and Consolidation: Providing access points on side streets or frontage streets rather than directly onto arterial streets and consolidation af ingress and egress points an the site and, when feasible, with adjacent properties. Access would continue to be gained via a curb cut located on SW 34th St and SW 29th St. The site development would include the removal of 8 parking stalls within the surface lot. The remaining 232 · parking stalls would still fall within the allowable range for the proposed use. No long term impacts would be generated by the proposal as the additions would not affect access points or maneuvering on site. Internal Circulation: Promoting safety and efficiency of the internal circulation system, including the location, design and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian access points, drives, parking, turnarounds, walkways, bikeways, and emergency access ways. See Location and Consolidation discussion above. loading and Delivery: Separating loading and delivery areas from parking and pedestrian areas. ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community, 1omic Development AMERICAN LEGEND RENOVATION~"' AUCTION CENTER Report of March 25, 2013 Environmental R Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report LUA13-000205, SA-A, ECF Page 10 of 14 The proposed expansion would not alter the existing loading and delivery areas for the site. Transit and Bicycles: Providing transit, carpools and bicycle facilities and access. Per RMC 4-4-0BOF.11 the number of bicycle parking spaces shall be 10% of the number of required off-street parking spaces. Based on the proposal which requires a minimum of 187 vehicle parking stalls and 19 bicycle parking stalls be provided. The applicant has not depicted bicycle parking stalls. Therefore, staff recommends the applicant revise the site plan to comply with the bicycle requirements outlined in RMC 4-4-0SOF.11. The revised site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval. Pedestrians: Providing safe and attractive pedestrian connections between parking areas, buildings, public sidewalks and adjacent properties. The site and existing use are industrial and would continue to operate in the same manner. As such, there are limited pedestrian connections on site. The applicant has an existing sports court located just north of the proposed addition. The area provides space for pedestrians, passive and active recreation use. The proposed structure would not block view corridors to shorelines or Mt. Rainier. The public access requirement is not applicable as the site is not adjacent to a shoreline. Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicated that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development; if the applicant provides Code required improvements and fees. The applicant would be required to pay an appropriate Fire Impact Fee. Currently this fee is assessed at $0.14 per square foot of new building area. Parks and Recreation: Not Applicable Drainage: The site is located within the Green River-Lake Washington watershed. Runoff from the north portion of the site enters into the tight lined system in the south side of SW 29'" St. From there it flows west to the conveyance system on the west side of Lind Ave SW and then continues north to SW 27'" St. Flows continue through the conveyance system in SW 27'" St and discharge into the Black River. Runoff from the southern portion of the site enters into the tight-lined system in the north · side of SW 34'" St and continues west eventually discharging into the Black River as well. A preliminary drainage plan and drainage report has been submitted with the site plan application, prepared by Blueline Land Development Consulting, dated February 15, 2013 (Exhibit 6). The report addresses compliance with the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and the 2009 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWM, Chapters 1 and 2. Developed runoff flow rates would not differ from existing flows. The proposed development would be replacing approximately 0.20 acres of existing pollution generating impervious area with an equal amount of roof area resulting in a decrease of pollution generating impervious surfaces. Therefore water quality treatment would not be necessary. ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community I 10mic Development AMERICAN LEGEND RENOVATION~'" AUCTION CENTER Environmental R1 Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report LUA13-000205, SA-A, ECF Report of March 25, 2013 Page 11 of 14 Transportation: The site has two public street frontage, SW 34th St and SW 29th St (Principal Arterial). Access is proposed from existing curb cuts along both streets. No street improvements would be required for this project. The transportation impact fee for the 9,400 addition is calculated at $0.84 per square foot. The fee is estimated at $7,802.00 which would be due with the building permit. Schools: Not Applicable. Water and Sewer: The site is served by the City of Renton for all utilities. There is a domestic water meter serving the existing building. There is a side sewer serving the existing building. 4JJ'.~HAS1N·c;·:ritHe::i!rppiica·rffilfs1rno1::irEt'tTest1ngjarr 1?11a 1acnt10na'i1pt,as1rt11 , ret''lJesr:1f;;,)i1;:r:~··c,-;;:~:~~~H;:~~~1;1,. .. :1~::::::·,::~ ~r 1~·;~1:?··~:~~ Hndt!lfu111!mm1~~auum~:~!~t:lll~li1!:.i:id1~!!b'.frl!,~i:m1mn;i:i111umlr.:.;•1:~1m1ma~:11'ffi~illlm11rnril1mmt1iiilili1i!la~~;;i;1i~,!F~1~!r.1t:rm!!i:t\~!Jh~1;;irjj:1!1'.im1~.~~:;1.,,!~~11Hid'.'.~'.·1,:,;:,::t:~ rt ... i; !'.'.'.bttt~i:;'. 0 I 1. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the responsible officials issue a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with one mitigation measure (Exhibit 6). 2. The proposal complies with the Site Plan Review Criteria if all conditions of approval are met. 3. The proposal is compliant and consistent with the plans, policies, regulations and approvals. 4. Staff does not anticipate any adverse impacts on surrounding properties and uses as long as the conditions of approval are complied with. 5. The use is compatible with existing and future surrounding uses as permitted in the IH zoning classification. 6. The scale, height and bulk of the proposed addition is appropriate for the site. 7. Safe and efficient access and circulation has been provided for all users. 8. There are adequate public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed addition. 9. Adequate parking for the proposed expansion has been provided. 10. The proposed site plan ensures safe movement for vehicles and pedestrians and has mitigated potential effects on the surrounding area if all conditions of approval are complied with. 11. The proposed addition would not generate any long term harmful or unhealthy conditions. Potential noise, light and glare impacts from the proposed use have been evaluated and mitigated if all conditions of approval are complied with. 12. Landscaping has been provided in all areas not occupied by the building or paving. I J. DECISION: The proposed Site Plan, for the American Legend Renovations & Auction Center, File No. LUAB-000205, ECF, SA-A, is approved and is subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the 1 mitigation measure issued as part of the Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated, dated March 25, 2013 (Exhibit 5). 2. The applicant shall submit a revised landscaping analysis noting compliance with the 35 square feet of landscaping, per parking space. The revised landscaping analysis shall be submitted to the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval. ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Deportment of Community , wmic Development AMERICAN LEGEND RENOVATION~'" AUCTION CENTER Report of March 25, 2013 Environmental R Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report LUA13-000205, SA-A, ECF . Page 12 of 14 3. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan depicting adequate square footage for the refuse and recycling deposit area. The revised site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to final occupancy. 4. The applicant shall revise the site plan to comply with the bicycle requirements outlined in RMC 4-4- 080F.ll with the inclusion of 19 bicycle parking stalls. The revised site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval. C.E. "Chip" Vincent, CED Administrator TRANSMITTED this 25th day of March 2013 to the Contact/Applicant/Owner: Contact: Melanie Pakingan Studio Meng Strazzara 2001 Western Ave, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98121 Owner/Applicant: American Legend Cooperative 200 SW 34th St Renton, WA 98057 TRANSMITTED this 25th day of March 2013 to the Parties of Record: None TRANSMITTED this 25th day of March 2013 to the following: Neil Watts, Development Services Director Kayren Kittrick, Development Services Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Fire Marshal Renton Reporter Land Use Action Appeals, Request for Reconsideration, & Expiration 03/27/13 Date The Environmental Determination and the Administrative Site Development Plan Review decisions will become final if the decisions are not appealed within 14 days of the decision date. Environmental Determination Appeal: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 p.m., April 12, 2013. Administrative Site Development Plan Approval Appeal: Appeals of the administrative site development plan review decision must be filed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 p.m. on April 12, 2013. APPEALS: An appeal of the decision(s) must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Deportment of Community 1omic Development AMERICAN LEGEND RENOVATION~ & AUCTION CENTER Report of March 25, 2013 Environmental R Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report LUA13-000105, SA-A, ECF Page 13 of 14 must be filed in writing together with the $250.00 application fee to Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7th Floor, (425) 430-6510. RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days of the decision date, any party may request that a decision be reopened by the Administrator (Decision-maker). The Administrator (Decision-maker) may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator (Decision-maker) finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14-day appeal timeframe. EXPIRATION:The Administrative Site Development Plan Review decision will expire two (2) years from the date of decision. A single two (2) year extension may be requested pursuant to RMC 4-9-200. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE: provides that no ex pa rte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning the land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial decision, but to Appeals to the Hearing Examiner as well. All communications after the decision/approval date must be made in writing through the Hearing Examiner. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the appeal by the Court. ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 3. Commercial, multi-family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 4. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to final occupancy permits Water: 1. A Double Check Valve Assembly (DCVA) will be required to be installed inline of the domestic water to the building. 2. The existing 8-inch DCVA for the fire sprinkler system does not meet current code. It will need to be removed and replaced with a Double Detector Check Valve Assembly (DDCVA). 3. If the new addition exceeds 30 feet in height, a reduced pressure backflow assembly (RPBA) will be required. 4. A water system development fee is owed if the size of the existing domestic water meter or fire line is increased. Fee is payable prior to issuance of the building permit. Sewer. 1. Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges are based on the size of the domestic water meter. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. Surface Water: 1. A surface water system development fee of $0.448 per square foot of new impervious surface may apply. This is payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. 2. A preliminary drainage plan and drainage report has been submitted with the site plan application. The report addresses compliance with the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual. After a cursory review of the TIR, the ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community, 10mic Development AMERICAN LEGEND RENOVATION~ & AUCTION CENTER Report of March 25, 2013 Environmental R Committee & Administrative Site Pion Report LUA13-000205, SA-A, ECF Page 14 of 14 engineer has stated the project is exempt from flow control (Core Requirement #3) and water quality (Core Requirement #8). 3. An erosion control plan will be required to be submitted with the building permit application. Transportation: 1. The transportation impact fee for the 9,400 addition is calculated at $0.84 per square foot. The fee is estimated at $7,802.00 which would be due with the building permit. Police 1. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2" throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. 2. All exterior doors should be made of solid metal or metal over wood, with heavy-duty deadbolt locks, latch guards or pry-resistant cylinders around the locks, and peepholes. If glass doors are used, they should be fitted with the hardware described above and additionally be fitted with a layer of security film. Security film can increase the strength of the glass by up to 300%, greatly reducing the likelihood of breaking glass to gain entry. Access to the back of the buildings should be limited, preferably with security fencing, as these areas could be vulnerable to crime due to the lack of natural surveillance by business customers or tenants. Fire: 1. The fire flow requirements and the fire hydrant requirements will not change with the proposed additions. Sufficient fire flow exists at the site presently and sufficient fire hydrants are also existing. The existing fire hydrants will need to be fitted with 5-inch storz fittings if they presently do not have them which is unlikely. 2. Approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems are required throughout the building. Separate plans and permits are required by the fire department. The fire alarm system shall be fully addressable and full detection is required. If the occupant loading exceeds 1,000 persons then a voice-type system is required. The fire alarm system shall cover the entire building, both new and existing. 3. Fire department apparatus access roadways are required to be maintained with proper fire lane signage. Required turning radius are 25-feet inside and 45-feet outside. Roadways shall be a minimum of 20-feet wide. 4. If an elevator is installed, it shall meet the minimum requirements for a bariatric sized ambulance stretcher of 40- inches by 84-inches. 5. An automated external defibrillator (AED) is required for all assembly type occupancies over 300 persons. General: 1. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two horizontal and vertical controls per the City's current horizontal and vertical control network. ERC/Site Plan Report I I . I ! : ---·---·-· . -... ------·· "' r I l Ii ': 1111• I I ·; l "' ., .. ~ ~ :~ !ji ii II i h!ll i : ~ ·.) • I&\] ..,, :~ .f 11! I H I 1!•1 I I ·f» rn CD ] ~ Ii " 1q 11!1 I , [riru .... ,~ 111 1, 1111, • <D = ~ ;;::-. i il11 ,~ = ,:;> o;· . ! I ii ,q ' i lrlfil -·· I . I Jg Q ~. P·1 ~ r I !ill! E9 11, . I- ~ I! i I -~I ~ ! • i ~ -~ ~ " ~ I it 1111111111111 h ~" I , 0 i ! I . -~ ~ ~ ,!, ... l ' •i iij •1 111 .i 'I I, i r II l!i~ i• rn!ll , . ~; ~gi { • .... ,. po"tl .: .: i !!i ·=· M 1 ' ! . .. UlmNGOffll:l•.a.1cl!oma,,,,te0 ! '! II j . ' i 111 [ I " ,. -ir 'I •I I ,, •, I ' ' , . ------v ', ' [/ ~11 ··1 ,I ,, ffi >< ~ l=l l:J;j l=I '9 w :ii ··1 Ii ,• 'I! ----------"' f l.i , z I i " ' n ' ' , § I ' I ~ I Ii ~ ~ ' I ' i I ' I ,! ' I 112],f ' ' 0! ,iwl II t! . -' I' : I -CD zc 0 ;a er < (/) z 0...., C) . ~ --i ~)>0 0 rz _OJ -u z -u )> 0 -u ;a ;a . A~ ~ori N "Tl ;a ~;a z c.,., r1 0 z ;a --,-or zC )> ...------ ~ rlr! ~1 m i' ' ~: ~ I 1111111111111h ii~ ~ ~ I I Ii I ii ii '; ~: i :·b [1:1 •' ,..:i' ' , ' ' ~ i{, ' ' '" • ' l" --' : I I ~ ' l-'1.$.I !1 ' -"Ir JI Ji,. , .. 'ff;~ l ~: ' : ' !IS. I ... ' -= .. _, I I I I I I 1, " ~: " I r: I ' I J I I I I • I I I I I 1 ' ! . .. "O ,.. ;o () "' r a, """.--•,a10 .. otafCW•TU> 1 'l II j ' : l ., ; in 0 4 "' 0 ~ +J 11& fil;l ;1 ~ ·r':01 .~· I f § I 1111111111111l: ~, $ .. I : ' : I i i _J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oi o~ i 1111;11111 1!!'~ I i I I ! I I I I I i I 111111 i I I ; I ! I i I I I ! : I I ! I I . . . ' ' ' . ' ~ . ~ EXIST. WA.REHOUSE TO REMAIN ""Cl ~ )> 0 :::0 01 () (.,J rrl cbr "' 0 rn -I ' ''" ·u al' ·, -• I ,•. '• • , ' ' •''1' ' I "1 ' ' I !'!i ' ' I ! I 111• j~ h 1: ,ii! 1:I !i I , . I -·----.. ,..,,... --- ffi ):( :i: l=I ffi l=I '9 ~ ~ 0 0 . I . l j I .J. """"°""'""''-'='f',.. .... tt><E)al"I, l i i i i i i i i I i i i i q,._. OJ ~ rm ~ [nfjj = ~ rm g -·-·-·-@ () ·u -n n.~· ;:.;: rn 2 '<: co ~-0 -::, co ~ "" s;? :L' -= (1) "" < ur :::, 6' ..... ::, 0 :Ji • 111 ~ .·.,I, I I I ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] J ] J J J ~IL~ !RIENli'ON Technical Information Report prepared for: Studio MeD11g Strazza11ra date: February 15, 2013 IE)(HIBIT 6 City of Renton Pianning Division Fm l 9 LUU ll:» lU [Elnr..o [E LAND 0EvnoPMENrcoNsuLr1NG lQ) U U~ 25 CENTRAL WAY SUITE 400 KIRKLAND WA 98033 D TEL 425-21&4051 FAX 425-216-4052 Cl THEBLUELINEGROlJP.COM February 14, 2013 File No. 12-164 ( -, American Legend Cooperative 200 SW 34th Street Renton, WA 98057 Attn: Anne Daffern, Chief Financial Officer Subject: GEOTECHNICAL REPORT American Legend Cooperative New Auction/Administration Center 200 SW 34th Street, Renton, WA Dear Ms. Daffern, (, PanGE@ I a C O A P O A A T • D Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering Consultants City of Renton Planning Division FEB l 9 lU1.\ PanGEO, Inc. completed a geotechnical study to assist the project team with the design and construction of the proposed building addition at the American Legend facility in Renton, Washington. The results of our study are summarized in the attached report. In summary, based on the results of our subsurface explorations, spread footings are considered a suitable foundation system for the proposed addition. However, it should also be noted that some settlement could occur during a strong seismic event. If a higher level of performance is needed, a deep foundation system will be required. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. Please call if there are any questions regarding this report. Sincerely, Siew L. Tan, P.E. Principal Geotechnical Engineer !EXHIBIT 7 3213 Ea~tlakt: A venue East. Suite B Seattle. WA 98102 Tel: (206) 262-0370 Fax: (206) 262-0374 llUJA i 3-CHllOl20l5 Ameroca1111l legelTlldl It· .. , . . .. ' IUl.(J '. Notes None 369 0 1: 4,423 0 184 NAD _ 1983 _ HARN_ StatePlane _ washington_ North_FlPS_ 4601 369 Foot CltyofRe1non® Finance & IT Division Legend Jurisdiction Boundaries [) Other [J City of Renton 0 Parcels Information Technology -GIS RentonMapSupport@Rentonwa.gov 3/21/2013 EXHIBIT 8 This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data laye~ that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, Of otherwise reliable. THIS MAP IS NOTTO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION . ·~.- PLAN REVIEW COMMENl~ ,LUA13-000205) 'p-~yof,, -==~=;::::::::--:: ';!) r~frn:;y1' t'','f\\~ _! \~~J.t ... ~,L!c:.J PLAN ADDRESS: Sw 200 34Th St APPLICATION DATE: 02/19/2013 Renton, WA 98057-4940 DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Development Review in order to construct a two-story 9,400 square foot office addition to an existing warehouse occupied by American Legend Co-op. The existing warehouse is approximately 200,000 square feet in size. The applicant is proposing the expansion primarily along the western fac;:ade in addition to the reconfiguration of the interior space to accommodate future needs for the same use. The subject property is located between SW 34th St and SW 29th St just west of East Valley Rd, at 200 SW 34th St. The project site consists of 2 parcels totaling 5.36 acres in area and is located within .the Heavy Industrial (IH) zone. There are no critical areas on site. Community Services Review Leslie Betlach Ph: 425-430-6619 email: LBetJach@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: No impacts to Parks. Engineering Review Jan IJJian Ph: 425-430-7216 email: jillian@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER There is a domestic water meter serving the existing building. SEWER There is a side sewer serving the existing building. STORM There is a storm conveyance system in the parking lot. STREETS There are existing street improvements. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. A Double Check Valve Assembly {DCVA) wit! be required to be installed inline of the domestic water to the building. 2. The existing 8-inch DCVA for the fire sprinkler system does not meet current code. It will need to be removed and replaced with a Double Detector Check Valve Assembly (DDCVA). 3. If the new addition exceeds 30 feet in height. a reduced pressure backflow assembly (RPBA) will be required. 4. A water system development fee is owed if the size of the existing domestic water meter or fire line is increased. Fee is payable prior to issuance of the building permit. SEWER A sewer system development fee is owed if the size of the existing domestic water meter is increased. Fee is payable prior to issuance of the building permit. STORM 1. A surface water system development fee of $0.448 per square foot of new impervious surface may apply. This is payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. 2. A preliminary drainage plan and drainage report has been submitted with the site plan application. The report addresses compliance with the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual. After a cursory review of the TIR, the engineer has stated·the project is exempt from flow control (Core Requirement #3) and water quality (Core Requirement #8). 3. An erosion control ptan will be required to be submitted with the building permit application. Fire Review • Construction Corey Thomas Ph: 425-430-7024 email: cthomas@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: Environmental Impact Comments: 1. Fire impact fees are applicable at the rate of $0.14 per square foot of building area. This fee is paid at time of building permit issuance, only for the area of addition. Code Related Comments: 1. The fire flow requirements and the fire hydrant requirements will not change with the proposed additions. Sufficient fire flow exists at the site presently and sufficient fire hydrants are also existing. The existing fire hydrants wiU need to be fitted with 5-inch storz fittings if they presently do not have them which is unlikely. 2. Approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems are required throughout the building. Separate plans and permits required by the fire department. Fire alarm system shall be fully addressable and full detection is required. If the occupant loading exceeds 1,000 persons then a voice type system is required. Fire alarm system shall cover entire building, both new and existing. 3. Fire department apparatus access roadways are required to be maintained with proper fire lane signage. Required turning radius are 25 -feet inside and 45-feet outside. Roadways shall be a minimum of 20-feet wide. 4. If an elevator is installed, it shall meet the minimum requirements for a bariatric sized ambulance stretcher of 40-inches by 84-inches. 5. An automated external defibrillator {AED) is required for all assembly type occupancies over 300 persons. Police Review Cyndie Parks Ph: 425-430-7521 email: cparks@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: Estimated CFS Annually: 5 To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security March 27, 2013 Page 1 of 2 • lighting and any construction trailers~ ·1d be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fe ... '.-,g. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospec 1ief and will demonstrate that this area is private pr /. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1,~ throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. All exterior doors should be made of solid metal or metal over wood, with heavy-duty deadbolt locks, latch guards or pry-resistant cylinders around the locks, and peepholes. If glass doors are used, they should be fitted with the hardware described above and additionally be fitted with a layer of security film. Security film can increase the strength of the glass by up to 300%, greatly reducing the likelihood of breaking glass to gain entry. Access to the back of the buildings should be limited, preferably with security fencing, as these areas could be vulnerable to crime due to the lack of natural surveillance by business customers or tenants. March 27, 2013 Page 2 of 2 . CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT· PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 1st day of March, 2013, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter, Notice of Application, Environmental Checklist, Reduced Site Plan documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Agencies See Attached Melanie Pakingan Applicant/Contact American Legend Cooperative Owner 300' Surrounding Property Owners See attached '"'"""" ofSeode,(, -~ Jy/ ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) · )SS "" _.-11' ~ _t,, - COUNTY OF KING ) \ dl\. :CIG"..-4,'!I i \ -.... ~N-29· ~ = I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker ~,,,,-9~ 0 1 """ ,...,+~/ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the11llffli/mr~i:p'l:ises mentioned in the instrument. Dated: rm a;,,t,/,) I a O(J I Notary P~ic in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) : ___ --"'b-\'-'A"'-'-. --"'&'-'~"'ab"'-'-'ea.'f ____________ _ My appointment expires: ~ v--s..\ ,;,q I d00 Project Name: . American Legend Renovations & Auction Center Project Number: LUAB-000205, ECF, SA-A template· affidavit of service by mailing I Dept. of Ecology ** Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region "' Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers • Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers • Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher* 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 Ouwamish Tribal Office • 4717 W Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA 98106-1514 KC Wastewater Treatment Division • Environmental Planning Supervisor Ms. Shirley Marroquin 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 City of Newcastle Attn; Steve Roberge Director of Community Development 13020 Newcastle Way Newcastle, WA 98059 Puget Sound Energy Municipal Liaison Manager Joe Jainga PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01 W Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. • Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 39015 -172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program• Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015 172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation• Attn: Gretchen Kaehler PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Kent Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AlCP Acting Community Dev. Director 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 City of Tukwila Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. **Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov template -affidavit of service by mailing ,, '. CON-WAY FREIGHT INC PO BOX 4138 PORTLAND, OR 98208 LECUYER EAST VALLEY LLC C/0 COAST REAL ESTATE SVCS 2829 RUCKER AVE STE 100 EVERETI, WA 98201 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 90868 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 POWELL-RENTON NO 1 LLC PO BOX 97070 KIRKLAND, WA 98083 PIETROMONACO/MODERN LLC PO BOX 700 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 BREKKE PROPERTIES LP PO BOX 287 MEDINA, WA 98039 PORTOFINO HOLDINGS LLC 3145 NW YEON AVE PORTLAND, OR 97210 FARWEST STEEL CORPORATION PO BOX 889 EUGENE, OR 97403 A & H II CO LLC C/0 JOSEPH F HOLTON 2098 S BREEZY POINT RD CAMANO ISLAND, WA 98292 PORTAL SECURITY LLC PO BOX 1273 SEATILE, WA 98111 BNSF RAILWAY CO PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 961089 FORT WORTH, TX 76161 PEN I RAE C LLC 3820 EAST VALLEY HWY S RENTON, WA 98055 AMERICAN LEGEND COOPERATIVE 200 SW 34TH ST RENTON, WA 98055 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS} A Master Application has been flied and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED)-Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Publlc Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: March 1, 2013 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA13-000205, ECF, SA-A PROJECT NAME: American Legend Renovations & Auction Center PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental {SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Development Review In order to construct a two-story 9,400 square foot office addition to an existing warehouse occupied by American Legend Co-op. The existing warehouse is approximately 200,000 square feet in size. The applicant is proposing the expansion primarily along the western fa~ade in addition to the reconfiguration of the interior space to accommodate future needs for the same use. The subject property is located between SW 34th St and SW 29th St just west of East Valley Rd, at 200 SW 34th St. The project site consists of 2 parcels totaling 5.36 acres in area and is located within the Heavy Industrial {IH) zone. There are no critical areas on site. PROJECT LOCATION: 200 SW 34t11 Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE {DNS): As the lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the ONS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: February 19, 2013 March 1, 2013 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Melanie Pak!ngan, Studio Meng Strazzara; 2001 Western Avenue #200; Seattle, WA 98121; Eml: mpaklngan@studloms.com Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: Environmental {SEPA) Review, Administrative Site Plan Review Bullding and Construction Permits Drainage and Geotechnical Reports Department of Community & Economic Development {CED) -Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton Clty Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 N/A If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED-Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: American legend Renovations & Auction Center/LUA13-000205, ECF, SA-A NAME:------------------------------------ MAILING ADDRESS: ________________ City/State/Zip:----------- TELEPHONE NO.: --------------- CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Proposed Mitigation Measures: The subject site is designated Employment Area Valley (EAV) on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Heavy Industrial (IH) on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental (SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-2-130A and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. Comments on the above appllcation must be submitted In writing to Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner, CED -Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on March 15, 2013. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mall, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7219; Eml: rtimmons@rentonwa.gov 11 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION II Denis Law ,·Mayor. Department of Con,,munity and Economic Development. · · C.E."Chip'.Vincent, Adminfstrator . March 1;2013 Melanie Pakingan Studio MeritStraziara . 2001 Western Avenue #200 · Seattle, WA 9812i Subject:· . Notice of Complete ·Application. · . ·. . . . . . . . . · Ameritan Legend Renovations & Auction Ctr, LUA13-000205, ECF, SA 0 A ' . . . . ' . . . . .·• , Dear rv,s·. Pakingan: . . . . ' . . The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application . is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is acc"epte·d for review.·. . . . . . ' ' ' . . ' ' . It is tentatively scheduled for co~siderati~n by the Env;ronmental Revi~w Committee on • .. · Match ?S, 2013, Prior to that review, you wilJ be notified. if any additiOnal information is required to continue proc·essing your application.. · Please contact me at {425) 430-7219 ifyo'u have any questjons. . ' . . . . . ' . ' . · ~Sincer~ely,.. . : . ; . :· : . 0 . . · .. ·~·.· · .· Roe le Timm~ s. : •. ··.· ... · ·.·.-·•· . · Se ior Plann.er · .. · · . · . cc: . American lege"nd Cooperative/ Own~r{s) · Renton City Hall • ioss South Grady Way.; R~nto~,Washingtcm9?057 .• renton,;_,a.gov ·. _, Pt< 13-. _,JtJtJ'J }( IA /3-/Jllt);J " ·• ' City of Renton "'''Yof Re Ptann· nton ing o· . 1v1sion LAND USE PERMIT FEB I 9 2013 MASTER APPLICATIO~~~nn-- ,, ., ';.' ' " . '' , ... ,, .. , 'I•> ',I ~ILJJ PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: A l--182-1 &A-l--l ~10 ~T1VE A-Jv\E?e I LA-1'! L.E=bEND ReWPVATI ON~ ..t A\.lc......, ~-' --- ~~ .... PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: ADDRESS:2oo ~'IN ~,--~,:;, ~w ::"'-'f-i-11 ~,- CITY: ~TON ZIP: ")805t ~n:>N , WA "}b0'7'1 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): TELEPHONE NUMBER: (-4-:z.o;,) v'.5,::;. -,?207 12. 7 i,e, oa::>4'-0 APPLICANT (if other than owner) EXISTING LAND USE(S): NAME: M~•E" f'A-1<--1t-1GrAt-1 w~, "7f'Pl,:ce=f\' P~•N&-1--a?, PROPOSED LAND USE(S): COMPANY (If applicable): :,.,-,..i::>10 ME=Nb--;,-• A ,9awie, EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: 2a, I WIS? 1 El"-~ AVE-, .SUit-,; :z.oo 13-1 f\..o'(l'\i;;~,-A12E'A vAUE'( PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CITY: ~l?A'lf'l.E ZIP: "781.:2. ! (if applicable) ""'~ EXISTING ZONING: TELEPHONE NUMBER: {=) '781-3,7-77 Hi,=Av''( 1 NC' U'7112--IA-1- CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): ,e,am.v SITE AREA (In square feet): NAME: 7a,i,,e. a~ "'b""',:; '9gc,,, 8??9 "76? rr SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (if applicable): DEDICATED: MIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: ADDRESS: N/A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: ZIP: ACRE (if applicable) '-•/A TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) { 2-LJ;;) 587/-· !?1CJ1 -NIA NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): M p,11,in'j~n {_;;) ~iol'Yl~, C.<>V'i\ \..,J,,. H:\CED\Data\Fonns-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\masterapp.doc -I -06109 NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (If applicable): PROJECT INFORMATION (continued) ..----'------...L.----------~ PROJECT VALUE: N/A --SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUl~DINGS (If applicable): N. 'A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (Wapplicable): N/A B,~11/?INGS TO REMAIN(~ applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL D AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE D AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS (If applicable): L..eV,a... I -,f /r;B'3 -5oG1t>r LeVl="\... :2.. •0-8.00 ~--- SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (If applicable): l-eva.-1 ~e,r a,,.o L.E'VQ.. :2.. :,.. I f!,'7 NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (ii applicable): NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): o D FLOOD HAZARD AREA D GEOLOGIC HAZARD IJ HABITAT CONSERVATION IJ SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES D WETLANDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. /Attach leaal description on separate sheet with the followlno Information Included} SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION _,TOWNSHIP __ , RANGE __ , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. et,...iy l~tv\~TAL-C\-4,£CKj,.....I :'?t 1<e,.,1EW..\t I a:o 3. 2. 511""E 1'\...-A-t.J l==NTlTLSM.IENJ '*'="' 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ ,,o-,o AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) M!?i.A-1-l lEa PAl<-IN/,,d, "1 , declaie under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that I am (please check one)_ the current owner of the property Involved In this appllcatlon or -\/"'the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein coolained and the lnfonnatlon herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and bellef. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Me,l,ti,.j<. Pa,ki lllad.'-. signed this insb\lment and acknowledge It to be his/her/their free and voluntary J- act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the Instrument. Notary Public In and for the State of Washln"gton (Signature ofOWner/Repiesentatlve) ll ~ r:.>< k • .. Notary {Print) !"10 "(13..., i;;;., ~,ea-UC" N-···-N_N_H __ ... NNNNO,....-,Om ... N""\"'NO ___ NN_O_ M@~ ~,<Ce,\~!M"iro-Il&n® . appointment exp1ies: 11/ c ra-ei r H,ICED\Data\Fo":' TempialeslSelf-Help~~slerapp.doc 2 - ; -~ of:W~atoD 06/09 COJ!lmlmijili'i!wlra N~ ..... 18; 2015 HHo,,.,,.,,,•,-.. "."'NN ... _,,,_,flflM""'""""'"•HH_, ___ ,_N_,N_ ' .. AMERICAN LEGEND RENOVATIONS & AUCTION CENTER 200 SW 34TH STREET, RENTON, WA 98057 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCELS A AND B, CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NO. 063-90, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9012199001 RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 4 AND 9, BLOCK 1, BURLINGTON NORTHERN ORILLA INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 108 OF PLATS, PAGES 12 AND 13, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ALC AMERICAN LEGEND COOPERATIVE City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98057 Ladies and gentlemen: BLACKGLAMA AMERICAN LEGEND P.O. Box 58308 Seattle, WA 98138-1308 T 425.251.3200 F 425.251.3222 City of Renton Plannin,: Division FEB I 9 ,u"1l The undersigned is the Chief Financial Officer of American Legend Cooperative ("ALC"), which is the sole owner of the property located at 200 SW 34th Street, Renton, WA 98057. ALC has engaged Studio Meng Strazzara to provide architectural and advisory services with respect to a renovation, expansion, and improvement project at the property. By this letter ALC authorizes Studio Meng Strazzara to execute the Affidavit of Ownership on our behalf as part of the Land Use Permit Master Application to be presented to the City of Renton on February 18, 2013. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions or need additional information. I can be reached directly at (425) 656 -0205. Very truly yours, Anne P. Daffern Chief Financial Officer americanlegendauctions.com blackglama.com americanlegend.com PLANNING DIVISION WAIV-~ OF SUBMITTAL REQU EMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS :1i1:s:si1:1:::i:::i~~:\\Yij71~l~l~l:m~~~i:H;i;i;Ji:i:i:im :i:i:~~AAfBHi:i ri!~~~11~~i:i :iririri;i:i:i:i:in:i:iiiii¢tjM'MENW$~'i,i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i; Calculations 1 tfotored . .Mi:ips.,f1irt:Ol/!1,1tay;p:,:.;,:,:,.,.,.,.,.,;,;,;,:,:,;,:,:,.,.,.,.,;;;,;,:,:,: :,.,:,.,.,.,;;;;;;;;;;;,:,.,.,. ,.,.;;,;,:,:,:,.,.,.,.,.,.,;;,,. ,.,.,.,.,.,,,.,,,,;,,,.,.,.,,,.,.;.;.,,;,,.,.,.,.,.,.;.;::,,::,:::.,.,.,,,::::,::::~;;;;:;.,.,., Construction Mitigation Description 2 AND 4 Density Worksheet 4 p,ZJ- ~r~i~~s~:~~mtm1::e!&if:1'~:::·:·:,:;:;,.:,:':':':':':':·:,:;:,:':':':':':::':':':;:·:·:·:1::i:::,:·::~:;:,:,:·:;;:·:1:': ':':;:,:,:::,:,:·:,:!:'·':,··:·, i:·:,:·:·:·:,:,;';':::':':':':::::rn::':,:,:···::,,:':,:·:·:·:::i:·:':':·:·:·:':::·:·:::::,:::: Drainage Report , §~Y~~i?:-0*1ii~m~*ffiR~Mt.~X~iii.~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiWiiiiiii iiiiiiiii:iiiiiiiiiiiii:iiiiiii :::::;:;:;m::::;:;m::::::::;::::::::::iiiiiiiiiii1ii:iiiiiiiii'iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:iiiii Environmental Checklist , §i@~M gqM¥M!1W(R-~9ii@~~PmmYH: : :::,::::::::::::::, :::: mmmi:rn:!:::w::::m~. ::rnm::::mm::::::::::::::::m::::m::::m:rnm:m::mm:m:rnm:m:m:mH Existing Easements (Recorded Copy), [:rr,q9~,:~~*-~:P.~K~H:•:;:::::;:::1;:;:;!;;;;;;;;;1,:;1:!:::1!!1::!:':':1::11;;;;,;,,:;,,:!::::;;~1:1;;:1: :;1;;i:i:i:;;;i;:::1::•::::::i<::::::!i1i11::1::1i:i;;::!iii'ii:::11:,:::H;;;:;;:1::111:11:1:::;i:1,::11::::::::ii,:,::::::::: Floor Plans JANo, @~W.r.~P~n~~ii,RWB.W.~:#~~:::m::::H::::::::::::w:rn:rn::::::::::m::rnmrn:::::::::::m:::m:m:::m: ::::::::::::::::::::m:::::::H :::::::::::::::rn:::•:::::::::m:::rnmrn:rn::m:::::m::m::::m:::::::wm:::mm . ' Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 $rnding,Rlan):Deta11eda,;; i!:lii!iilJ::li!iiliiiJ:i::im::iJi:i:1:i:i:iWiiiJij :i/::iJiJljJijjJJmJii)ji,i::i iJlJ!:i:iJ!JiiiJiJil!Ji:iWiliJ iJiJiJiliJJ:iJ!Ji:iJ!JiJi!!iiJili:i!iJi:iJiJi:::iJi:i:JJiJJjmJ!JiJiJ!:ii!iil1i!iii!iilli!iiliJ1 Habitat pata Report 4 ;:J;:f, Irrigation Plan 4 lj(t(\~:C¢itify:A$!i~M~ta~,M~p:1Ai;l@l!JhQ:~i!e:4:::::::,;,,,;,:~ .,,,,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;::,i,,::::,i: Landscape Plan, Conceptual, h~qc1$page.J?.l!¥), O.etai1¢d11 .. : ..... : ... :. . ..:.:.: ........ :.: ... ).:.:.: .: : .... : .. :,:, .. :., .. : ... ! .···· ... :.::,:,: ... : .......... : ....... :.::.....) .. J,; :.....;,:,::.:,.,y:, ::.i. :: .. <i .. : .:.:::::::: -., -__., .. _ .... ._ .. Legal Description• ~, _. . . Mailing Labels for Property Owners, FEB LU13 M~il':i?t:lli&~~1r..11.·$Jt~;Qgh~1@Fi~!!:'''''',:i'''''''''':'''''':'''''::''''''' ::;ii,::''''""!'!''''''''''' '':''''"'':"'':'''''::''':'''' Master Application Form, @n"; ~Is fl\\Rls rR'l Neighborhood Detail Map 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Planning Section PROJECT NAME: 4,._,,~.,-..,../'-" Lee @c!?.::> DATE: l,jz~h?c1J9 Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\waiverofsubmlttalreqs.xls 02/08 PLANNING DIVISION WAIVE1110F SUBMITTAL REQUIR("'nENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS · 1:i:1:1:1:1:1i:1:11:j~~:m1:~1:.Jf~r~~m=~:11~~111:1:1:::1:1:1:1:1: :::1:~1~1:11:: :1::m~::~m~:1: 1:1:im1:1:1t!:::~~~~~[~~:1J1:1:1i1:1:1:1:1:::1:::1:1:1:: Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis • ~i~~i~~~m~iim~:(fi/Mm~ii~::mmmmmrnm:1:m:mm::::11:1:1:mm::1::: :mm:m::mmmmmmm:mmmm:m:m:m:m mmm:im::::mmm:::::::!:jmm:mm:mm:mm:immmmmmmmmi Plat Name Reservation • _P.Q~#iQ~~li!lil'.mll!l:l:1:1:i:lHH:J:l:l:W:i:iii:ni:!:i:l!ljil!:!:l!lJiil:l:!:l!l!l!i:!:1:1:1:1=1:i: :1:iH!i:J1l=H!:J:1:!:!ii:liil i:1:i1i:1:1:!:!l!il:l:i:l:llill: i:1n:Hi:!:~:j:j!~iii!:i;j:i:i:[:;:;:::i:iiiii?~:j:i:i:!:i'.i'.~'.ijl![!'.:i:!:;:ii!ijiH[![:i:i:1 Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 )r-O.~!.\t1iW:~~~iij\~#,§m,~~t\¢,f;fii1;,,,;,;,;1,1:,,,:,:,;,.:,:,,,;, •• ,,i:i;i;i ,,:,i!1:,;,:,:1,,,i;i;,;,!,!:;, ii;,,,;,n::,i,1l:,::1,i!i'ili!i ,,;,.,;,;,;,;,;,:,; •. , •. ,.,.,,,,,,:,:,;,,: •.•. ::;;, •••••••••••• ,;,;,;,,;,;,:,,,,,;,:,i Rehabilitation Plan 4 _ *#r1¥.¥&@iifjqi1~iiil!i:i::'i::!i::ifi::::::!i:::::m:m1:i:::1:i::::::::1:1:m:::m:::::1:::::mm:m1m:m::::1mJ::::::m:m::1::ii:i:::::m mm:i:i:1::::mmmm:::1:1:1:1::::m::m:i:i:mm::immmmmrnmrnmmm Site Plan 2 AND• _ ~Jr;~&\!~r;!¥.~~W,1~!W,~Y,~!*!~~~~'.ryj!#i!i!i!ii!H!i!:1::::m::!i!i!i!i!!ii!i)i! @1i1i!"''. ~::~ i!i[)!!!Hi1!!i!i1,:m1i!i!l!i! Hi!i[i[i!i!i[!!iH!H:Hl!iiH!i1i!i!i1iH:m::1:Ji!HiH!m:::::::::::::::Hm::::::!!iiii!i Stmam or Lake Study, Supplemental 4 / ~ ~P:i¥:#:ro.:ar.:µ~~~!Mttisa11onHm1ar;1:w:H/HH1HH!HH:::m:H::,H:mH:Hm ::::rn:;;;·.::mm:::Hm ,:m:m:mmmmm:::,:m :::::H','i'n,,,1H:::::rn:rn,:•:::::::u:::::,,::,:n:1,::n:::n,::?n::;,;,::::::::1:: Street Profiles 2 W ill\ii~i:ffl~m!?,~iMifJ:f,i1~~i~~~WR~1~:~i:::}:mw:imm:mmrnm:::::::::::::mrn:m::mm:m:m:t:::t::::m::!i::::::m:::: ::::m:mm:m:m:m::m::::::m:::mmm:::m:::m::)m::m:tm:::::::mr Topography Map J. , 1/J.~rt!§'~J~~~ii!J!':::::::::::·::):::::·:·:':':::·:':·(:::::::::::·:::::::::::::::::':·::::::::'1::·:::::·:::::::::·:::::'::: ':'1':·:::·:·:::·:::::::::::'::: :::,:<:::·:':::::·:::::::::::::::·:'::::,::',::::·:::::::');':':·::<'''':·:·:::::::·:·:· Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4 ' ~ ' /../ "',:J )/P.t'<7 d')? · ~, b 9'.r.~#nn~~~#r::~~~isffilg}v.~&~~:~i*M~e.:m~~N1nw~::m:::::m mw::~ ::urnrn:::::::::::::u::::: :m:::m:m:m::mm:m:::::m::rn:rn:::mm:::::::m::::rn::::m::::mw:mm Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 ~~ij~~~~:!,w~~r1&~:m1#!.i~i~li~1::!i/:im:::mmrnm:1:::1:1:1:1:::1:!:1::: :J:1:::~u~i :m:m:mmmmm1::m1: m:::m:mw:m::1:1:1:1:mmrnm::::m:rnm::1:::1m1:1::w1:11::1::::mm::m: Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4 / · Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2ANDJ Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 1 AND 3 Map of View Area 2 AND 3 Photoslmulations· 2 AN 0 ·3 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Planning Section PROJECT NAME: /lmt:l"!Cd-/1 Vf&14 DATE: // /20 Ua/2, i 7 Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSER\/\Forms\Planning\walverofsubmittalreqs.xls 02/08 I PREAPPllCATIOi\l MEIETING IFOR AMERICAN LEGEND RENOVATIONS & AUCTION CIENTER 200 SW 34th St PRE 12-000097 CITY OIF IRIEi\lll"Oi\11 Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division November 21, 2012 Contact Information: Planner: Roca le Timmons, 425.430.7219 Public Works Plan Reviewer: Arneta Henninger, 425.430.7298 Fire Prevention Reviewer: Corey Thomas, 425.430.7024 Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell, 425.430.7290 City Of R Planning o,enton Vision FEB 1 9 Z01J Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work on the project. You will need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply for land use and/or environmental permits. Pre-screening: When you have the project application ready for submittal, call and schedule an appointment with the project manager to have it pre-screened before making all of the required copies. The pre-application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Development Services Director, Department of Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator and City Council). FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT ---, ,.. . Cilrof,, ---==---=-=--=-· · i 'K~@rotf©I:61 MEMORANDUM DATE: November 20, 2012 TO: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner FROM: SUBJECT: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector Comments for American Legend Auction Center 1. The fire flow requirements and the fire hydrant requirements will not change with the proposed additions. Sufficient fire flow exists at the site presently and sufficient fire hydrants are also existing. The existing fire hydrants will need to be fitted with 5-inch storz fittjhgs if they presently do not have tbem which is unlikely. 2. Fire mitigation impact fees are currently applicable at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of building area. This fee is paid at time of building permit issuance, only for the area of addition. This fee will drop to $0.14 per square foot for office SRace as of Janua!:Y_l~,.20:lJ. J l,'-'\.~· -L~ O-d~k 3. Approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems are required t~g~r ~IN"·l . ..JJ_ the building. Separate plans and permits required by the fire. . ~. · ~ 'E:.f" ~,. 7 department. Fire alarm system shall be fully addressable and full detection is required. If the occupant loading exceeds 1,000 pe~sons then a voice type system is required. Fire:alarm s stem shall cover entire building, both new and existing. ,,; f I ,JI, I _ (-'~Cl .f't/l,{ WI ~~•-· 4. Fire department apparatus access roadways are fequired to be "--BC::.~,£..,.¥..-} maintained with proper fire lane signage. Required turning radius e, ~t are 25-feet inside and 45-feet out~id~. ~oadways shall b~ }! I / ,..,r --l---· minimum of 20-feet wide. ~d l;ft,~ 'cl--6'<-ti:~J l"cr ~t,t,v~ · 5. If an elevator is installed, it shall meet the minimum requirements for a bariatric sized ambulance stretcher of 40-inches by 84-inches. 6. An automated external defibrillator {AED) is required for all assembly type occupancies over 300 persons. (___I'""~ /J * .,k~y C,#,.,,,P ,.;,.,e(_ . ,f,:, ~ , 'l /~ ~ ft;'-,;,_/~ DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM November 20, 2012 Rocale Timmons, Planner Arneta Henninger, Plan Review /t# American Legend Auction Center 200 SW 34 TH St PRE 12-000097, Parcel 1253800040 NOTE: The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary is preliminary and non- binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official city decision-makers. Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. I have completed a preliminary review for the interior renovations of existing spaces and the addition of a new two story 9,000 sq. ft. office space adjacent to the existing building. Site work includes new hardscape, retaining walls, stairs, ramps, and landscaping, all located in the West Y, of Sect. 31 Twp. 23N, Rng 5 E. The following comments are based on the pre-application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant. Water 1. This site is located in the City of Renton water service areas. 2. Per the City of Renton Fire Marshal, the fire flow requirements and the fire hydrant requirements will not change with the proposed additions. 3. Approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems are required throughout the building. 4. The existing 8-inch backflow preventer (single detector check valve) assembly for the fire sprinkler system does not meet current code and it must be replaced with a Detector Double Check Valve Assembly (DDCVA) in an exterior vault. A larger vault may be required for the new DDCYA (__ .:..rJ f / '')A) ./t., 5. This site is located in the City of Renton water service areas. b<., r~4',:;~J) 6. The site is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. 7. There is an existing 12" DI water main, located through the middle of the site. See City of Renton drawing number W 0521. 8. There is an existing 12" DI water main in SW 34th St. See City of Renton drawing number W 199706. ® American Legend -PRE 12-000097 · Page 2 of 3 November 20, 2012 9. A Double Check Valve Assembly (DCVf-) ~~t be installed behind the existing domestic water meter(s) serving the building. ~ 10. Buildings that exceed 30' in height shall install a backflow pressure device. 11. The proposed addition cannot encroach into the existing 15-utility easement for the fire sprinkler stub. 12. The site is located in the 196 water pressure zone. The static pressure is approximately 78 psi. Pressures that exceed 80 psi are required to install a pressure reducing device. 13. System Development Charges for water are based on any and all water meters if an existing meter is upsized or the addition of any new water meters. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. There is a proposed increase, and on average that increase is proposed at about 12% on each fee {water, sewer, and storm). Sanitary Sewer 1. There is an existing 8"sanitary sewer main on SW 34th St. See City of Renton drawing S-1997. 2. Any use in the building involving the handling of grease or oil shall require installation of a properly sized grease or oil interceptor. 3. System Development Charges for sanitary sewer are based on any and all domestic meters if an existing meter is upsized or with the addition of any new water meters. These fees are collected at the time a construction perm it is issued. Storm Drainage 1. There are existing storm drainage facilities on SW 34'" St. See City of Renton drawing #TED 2285. 2. A storm drainage report will be required .. All storm drainage shall be in compliance with the City of A Renton amendments to the 2009 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual. -z_. :?t, tc .J, ef ~ 3. The project will need to show how the new addition and new paving will handle the storm ru~. 4. Payment of Surface Water System Development Charges of $.405 per square foot of new impervious area, but not less than $1012.00, is required. This fee is collected prior to the issuance of the construction permit. f'I \ Street Pdije~en~' --~ D-,../!ftJ '0W~s 1. Additional street improvements will not be required. 2. Traffic Impact fees have been adopted by the City of Renton effective January 1, 2013, and will apply to this project. / • J , r S k4 ,-,....~e, .. -).~ ~ de /'C:rt,<--&r-C.:./ General Comments , --/ / ' 1. All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical Conttol Network . . 3. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PREAPPS\12-000097.Rocale\Plan Review Comments PRE 12-000097.docx DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM November 21, 2012 Pre-Application File No. 12-000097 Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner American Legend Renovations and Auction Center 200 SW 34th St General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official. decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator, Planning Director, Development Services Director, and City Council). Review comments may. also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or online at www.rentonwa.gov Project Proposal: The subject property is located between SW 34'" St and SW 29'" St just west of East Valley Rd, at 200 SW 34'" St. The project site consists of 2 parcels totaling 5.36 acres in area and is located within the Heavy Industrial {IH) zone. The pre-application packet indicates that the proposal is to c.onstruct a two-story 9,000 square foot office addition to an existing warehouse occupied by American Legend Co-op. The existing warehouse is approximately 200,000 square feet in size. The applicant is proposing the expansion primarily along the western fa~ade in addition to the reconfiguration of the interior space to accommodate future needs for the same use. Access to the site would continue to be gained from SW 34th St and SW 29'" St. There are no critical areas on site Zoning: The property is located within the Employment Area Valley (EAV) land use designation and the Heavy Industrial (IH) zoning classification. Warehousing and office uses are outright permitted land use within the IH zoning designation. Development Standards: The project would be subject to RMC 4-2-BOA, "Development Standards for Industrial Zoning Designations" effective at the time of complete application (noted as "IH standards" herein). Minimum Lot Size. Width and Depth -There are no minimum lot standards within the IH zone. h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\12-000097.rocale\12--000097 (ih -american legend renovations).doc American Legend Page 2 of4 November 21, 2012 Lot Coverage There is no minimum lot coverage requirement within the IH zone. Setbacks -The required setbacks in the IH zone are as follows: 20 feet for a front yard; zero for the rear yard; and zero for the interior side yards. The existing facility complies with the setback requirements of the zone and the proposal would not alter the front yard setback. Building Height -There is no maximum building height requirement within the IH zone. Screening -Screening must be provided for all surface-mounted and roof top utility and mechanical equipment. The site plan application will need to include elevations and details for the proposed methods of screening. Refuse and Recycling Areas-Refuse and recycling areas need to meet the requirements of RMC 4-4-090, "Refuse and Recyclables Standards" (enclosed). For.industrial and other nonresidential developments a minimum of 3 square feet per every 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area shall be provided for recyclable deposit areas and a minimum of 6 square feet per 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area shall be provided for refuse deposit areas with a total minimum area of 100 square feet. Landscaping -Except for critical areas, all portions of the development area not covered by structures, required parking, access, circulation or service areas, must be landscaped with native, drought-resistant vegetative cover. The development standards require that all pervious areas within the property boundaries be landscaped. The minimum on-site landscape width required along street frontages is 10 feet, except where reduced through the site plan development review process. Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070) for additional general and specific landscape requirements (enclosed). A conceptual landscape plan and landscape analysis meeting the requirements in RMC 4-8-120D.12, shall be submitted at the time of application for Site Plan Review. Parking -Off-street parking, loading areas, and drive aisles for the entire site shall meet the requirements of RMC 4-4-080, "Parking, Loading and Driveway Regulations". The following ratios would be applicable to the site: Use Ratio Warehousing Min: 1 spaces/ 1,500 SF Max: 1 spaces / 1,500 SF General Min: 2.0 spaces/ 1,000 SF Office Max: 4.5 spaces/ 1,000 SF It is unclear how many parking stalls are existing on site and how much space would be dedicated to each use. The applicant will be required at the time of formal land use application to provide detailed parking information (i.e. stall and drive aisle dimensions) and calculations of the subject site and the overall campus use. Where practical difficulties exist in meeting parking requirements, the applicant may request a modification from these standards. The applicant will be required at the time of formal land use application to provide detailed parking information (i.e. stall and drive aisle dimensions) and calculations of the subject site and the overall campus usen n I _ , . ~\ dlJ-_ \-'6-, IC~ h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\12-000097 ~e\12-000097 (ih -american legend renovations).doc American Legend Page 3 of4 November 21, 2012 @ . ' It should be noted that the parking regulations specify standard stall dimensions. Surface parking stalls must be a minimum of 9 feet x 20 feet, compact dimensions of 8Yi feet x 16 feet, and parallel stall dimensions of 9 feet x 23 feet; compact surface parking spaces shall not account for more than 30 percent of the spaces in the surface parking lots. ADA accessible stalls must be a minimum of 8 feet in width by 20 feet in length, with an adjacent access aisle of 8 feet in width for van accessible spaces. The appropriate amount of ADA accessible stalls based on the total number of spaces must be provided. Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070 and RMC 4-4-0SOF.7) for further general and specific landscape requirements (enclosed). Additionally, the proposal would need to be revised in order to provide bicycle parking based on 10· % of the required number of parking stalls. Access-Driveway widths are limited by the driveway standards, in RMC 4-4080I. Critical Areas There appear to be no critical areas on site. Environmental Review The proposed project would be subject to Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review due to the size of the project. Therefore, an environmental checklist is a submittal requirement. An environmental determination will be made by the Renton Environmental Review Committee. This determination is subject to appeal by either the project proponent, by a citizen of the community, or another entity having standing for an appeal. Permit Requirements The proposal would require Administrative Site Plan Approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review. The purpose of the Site Plan process is the detailed arrangement of project elements so as to be compatible with the physical characteristics of a site and with the surrounding area. An additional purpose of Site Plan is to ensure quality development consistent with City goals and policies General review criteria includes the following: a. Compliance and Consistency. Conformance with plans, policies, regulations and approvals, including: b. Off-Site Impacts. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses. c. On-Site Impacts. Mitigation of impacts to the site d. Access and Circulation. Safe and efficient access and circulation for all users. e. Open Space. Incorporation of public and private open spaces to serve as distinctive project focal points and to provide adequate areas for passive and active recreation by the occupants/users of the site; f. Views and Public Access. Provision of view corridors to shorelines and Mt. Rainier, incorporates public access to shorelines, and arranges project elements to protect existing natural systems where applicable. h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\12--000097.rocale\12-000097 (ih -american legend renovations).doc American Legend Page 4 of 4 November 21, 2012 g. Services and Infrastructure. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; h. Signage. Use of signs primarily for the purpose of identification and management of sign elements -such as the number, size, brightness, lighting intensity, and location - to complement the visual character of the surrounding area, avoid visual clutter and distraction, and appear in proportion to the building and site to which they pertain; and i. Phasing. Inclusion of a detailed sequencing plan with development phases and estimated time frames, if applicable. All applications can be reviewed concurrently in an estimated time frame of 6-8 weeks once a complete application is accepted. The Site Plan Review application fee is $2,000. The application fee for SEPA Review (Environmental Checklist) is $1,000. If a parking modification is needed it can be processed concurrently with the other land use applications for of $100. There is an additional 3% technology fee at the time of land use application based on the total fee of all land use approvals requested. Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal is provided in the attached handouts. In addition to the required land use permits, separate construction, building and sign permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of the land use permits, but cannot be issued prior to the completion of any appeal periods. Impact Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction fees, the following impact fees would be required prior to the issuance of building permits. ~ A Transportation Impact Fee based on $75.00 per new daily trip attributed to the development. This fee would is subject to change in January of 2014. ~ A Fire Impact Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of new commercial building area. This fee will drop to $0.14 per square foot for office space on January 1st, 2013. Expiration: Upon site plan approval, the site plan approval is valid for two years with a possible two-year extension. h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\12-000097.rocale\12-000097 (ih -american legend renovations).doc G3 -19 T23N RSE W 1/2 IL " ~o t=======~*1== .. :-:_::c.-:.::'_'.;_ ====-S '~ - -,-----·-1-; -i ' I' --------1 -i RC ~ ,--.L .... , ·-· a! : IL ! ' I IL j '\ RC '\ '/ / / , a I ;, .• IM r I II // // '\ /.. ',:: .. ,r ....... / ....... IL IM RC SW:Wlll51 . ; / ' ' ' .. ,· ' , I ' / I I 1 I , , r :1 I !I ____ ;_---= .. -······· ...... ....... _ _.... .~ IL IM ' . -.. - I IH / , , __..,•' - ,-IM -- :: .-...=.-.----' CA -i;-1 ! ZONING MAP BOOK 13 -31 T23N RSE W 1/2 PW TECHNICAL SERVICES PRINTED ON 11/13/09 11w "°'""'°"' ~ • ,,pNc ,..,, ... ,.,., ... not _ ..... ~ ••• ......,. ..... ,...,.,,,4~ ... """ I R·l ii ·-.; - lh< ot>ll,l><-~"'-'ltl>lo n,1..,..,., __ Thl,m,pain...,..,ll.,.c..,.<1 ...... p,"'°"'1~ no V' 200 400 I I IFeel 30 1'23N RSE W 1/2 1:4,800 5330 = ~ I (;> C t::l (;> ~ ; l"'J .... i:l IPRE12a000!097 Amerocaio, legend! 514 0 257 514 NAD_1983_HARN_StatePlane_Wsshington_ North_FIPS_4601 Feet Information Technology -GIS RentonMapSupport@Rentonwa.gov 11/19/2012 This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION Legend Jurisdiction Boundaries [] Ott,~ [] City of Renton D Parcels None ® 1: 6,168 ~(Q)IDl® Finance & IT Division (!) ~ ~ ,...,,. M ft II~ J.. ___ _JJ _I _JJ __J ' ' " ' ' II __J I I I I I I I I : EXISIN I IW><STAGE/ f'!lOCll.CTION I /·=~ -~.. I 11· --~.';:;=7;.~t~~.J.'~~ ® ;:iaa -t -=-i . c:-:..~-~:J c::==E.=:i::::-::.:;.:,. a~§ § 1;t1 I it r..:..---:-"l ,_-__ . .:::1t •-::.:-_:;-:,. --~-s 1t~~-:;·=~~f§~-i-i" .. !-~-;-· @ @ c:::.:-:."':::.:..":J c=.=-===> t:";;;:.._:-::::::i !: . -·-·-.. ... :;:_:-:-:n::=.:--=t· c:=-~ f::=i=rl,7/=",,1" @ @ c:~:~ r---=-:::£.-~ c-;:::-_;==-:i L-_ _, ·3 L (4) tt?z~TAL w SlA.NOPIPE (r ~ RAILROAD EASEM£N PER REC. MO. 79031608p8 --~ PARCEL B sp· os:l'-090 --·ti ~# lj ... j ElGS11NCl - [ -- ~ ~------:::, =· =! <==--=--~ 9 c--:_:--.:3 c==--==~ ~::--:i .,,xnxTun,nxxxTnxn,=.o ---$ @ -@~~l <~~Jl=-=-=-=r., c=,~~ OiUX..U.X.<AXXJ --· . -·!) i"'· .. _ -------- ,Iii· , I I I I I ND wca.,,,~f-""'' l.(w. (,c,Ci\,J, Is 1.\1;1' t> lrn\,,\ 1,. Gtn.:Vr-16>, ;a~~=il,;J'--,.::----:v---0:::::::::.-· tt\'ltrll t,ll iN, 1 <,,,. ,cc oo,, i;._0, ·-. :.• 1..:.\1\1' t,:i.\:W 3 \:)\)(,\JJ\ lt-! ~!\Ur( I I I 11<1<,< nk\ ,,. .:h,ocO J I' ~~ I ii k~ mr=r i i I I [!l El I n EX!ST.WIU U TO-"-~ 11.' ul'\ -"'-r-":!L. ___ _ I Ml!'J . / ~ ~--- I --+-- +-------l - ' . ' 1 II so2·45•51"w 11J1.s9' ~---, ---ClF rs o.3' E or------------------------------- . PROP. LINE i O 60' 90' , .. _w] U11J11ES EASEWEHT I PER. REC. NO. ........... -~ ..... -,ml,:)) j( I! fl ·U ?i'.5' $! ~ ------------TC2).------- \l'\S"i),u.. DOL\ll\ 20· UllUTY EASEWDJy.~_J fhfr,JUO Otn,Efii<. 0,.)((1,,..,' _ PLAT CF BUift.1~~ 'Wfiofrtl. 0 studiC'MENG STRAZZARA ll:DltlESm."1111!,Un!.JDOG,Q"?W.-a,:n 1111:musr.J:m,1m:rm::!!!'r - ARCHfJEC1'\JRE PLAMN1NG1 CONSll..TWG -Aucl1on/Adminlslra1lan Cen!ar AMERICAN LEGEND CO-OP 200 SW 341h Br:cd:. Acrmn. WA SNIJ57 I~ LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN ,,e,re,.../ SCALE: 1"-30'-o' IIJA2.0 stud iC'MENG STRAZZARA ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING February 18, 2013. Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE: American Legend Co-op, Renovations & Auction Center Project Narrative • Project name, size & location of site: American Legend Co-op Renovations & Auction Center, 200 SW 34th Street, Renton WA 300,071 SQ FT SITE (Parcel 8) • Land use permits required for proposed Project Site Plan Review Permit • Zoning Designation of the site and adjacent properties Employment Area Valley -Industrial Land Use Designation (/HJ Heavy Industrial • Current use of the site and any existing improvements Warehouse, Office and parking lot • Special site features None • Statement addressing soil type and drainage conditions Sand, sift and clay soils. Please see attached Geotechnical Report for more details. • Proposed use of the property and scope of the proposed development Project site covers a 77,505 SQ FT portion of a 396,839 total SQ FT property. The everyday existing use and proposed use is an office for approximately 40 people. Our work includes interior renovations of the existing office spaces and the addition of a new 2-story 9,400 SQ FT office space adjacent to the existing building. • For plats indicate the proposed number, net density and range of sizes (net lot area) of the new lots Not applicable • Access From SW 34'h and SW 2gh Streets, access will stay the same. • Proposed off-site improvements Not applicable • Total estimated construction cost and estimated fair market value of the proposed project $4.9 mi/ion TEL 206 587 3797 FAX 206 587 0588 2001 WESTERN AVE, SUITE 200 SEATTLE. WA, USA 98121 www.stud1oms.com stud iC'MENG STRAZZARA • Estimated quantities and type of materials involved if any fill or excavation is proposed There will be minor structural fill as needed • Number, type and size of any trees to be removed No trees will be removed. • Explanation of any land to be dedicated to the City Not applicable • Any proposed job shacks, sales trailers, and/or model homes Not applicable • Any proposed modifications being requested for projects located within 100 feet of a stream or wetland Not applicable Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional materials to complete your revulht}. (_ ,r f1-( ttJ Chris Davidson, AIA LEED AP+BD Studio Meng Strazzara Architects Cc:Fife TEL 206 587 3797 FAX 200 587 0588 2001 WESTERN AVE, SUITE 200 SEATTLE, WA, USA 98121 www.stud1oms.com studiC'MENG STRAZZARA City of Renton Planning Division .,_RCHIH:CTVRE PLANNING CONSULTING February 18, 2013. Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE: American Legend Co-op, Renovations & Auction Center 200 SW 34 1 " Street, Renton WA 98057 Construction Mitigation Description • Proposed Construction Dates June 2013 to February 2014 • Hours and days of operation Monday to Friday: 7:30am to 4:30pm • Proposed hauling/transportation Routes To be determined FEB I 9 2013 • Measures to be implemented to minimize dust, traffic and transportation impacts, erosion, mud, noise, and other noxious characteristics Silt fencing and any exposed grade cuts can be protected with plastic sheets to minimize erosion. Water can be used to suppress dust. Barriers and/or silt fences can be installed around potentially dusty activities. • Any special hours proposed for construction or hauling Construction work is to be restricted during standard business hours. Special hours for hauling is to be determined by the contractor. • Preliminary traffic control plan To be determined by the contractor. cc: File TEL 206 587 3797 FAX 206 587 0588 2001 WESTERN AVE, SUITE 200 SEATTLE. WA, USA 98121 www.studioms com PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLISltvotn l!:::::==========================================::::;:;;~~:!!.lnton PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 ' -•ann,ng Division FEB 1 9 LU13 /Ri~~~u~~© The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). -1 -06109 \\SMSVAUL T2013\Vault\PROJECTS\2012 · SMS\12305.01 American legend Renton\City of Renton\T0\130215 Site Plan Entitlement\8.5x11\ALC envchlst.doc @ For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively . • 2 . 06/09 \\SMSVAUL T2013\Vault\PROJECTS\2012 -SMS\12305.01 American legend Renton\City of Renton\T0\130215 Site Plan Entitlement\8.5x11\ALC envchlst.doc A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: American Legend Renovations 2. Name of applicant: Studio Meng Strazzara 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 2001 Western Ave, Suite 200 Seattle WA 98121 Chris Davidson, AIA, 206.587.3797 4. Date checklist prepared: February 8, 2013. 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Dept. of Community & Economic Development 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): June 2013 Start of Construction 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. o Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Limited Phase II Investigation dated November 28, 2000, prepared by Kane Environmental, Inc. o Geotechnical Report by PanGEO, Inc. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Site Plan/Land Use Permit and Building Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. Project site is a 38,500 SQ FT portion of an existing 200,000 SQ FT warehouse. Our work includes interior renovations of the existing office spaces and the addition of a new 2-story 9,000 SQ FT office space adjacent to the existing -3. 06/09 \\SMSVAUL T2013\Vault\PROJECTS\2012 -SMS\12305.01 American Legend Renton\City of Renton\T0\130215 Site Plan Entitlement\8.5x11\ALC envchlst.doc building. Twice a year there is a 1 week Jong auction when the building's capacity wil/ be 10 times the normal capacity. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 200 SW 34'h St, Renton WA 98057, the office portion of the warehouse located just southeast of the Sport Court. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _____ _ Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) The site is basically level with 2% slope to drains. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sand, silt and clay; see attached Geotech Report for details. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Not known. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. 130 cubic yards of fill f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. It's possible during excavation for the office addition's foundation. However, most of the site is covered by asphalt paving (parking Jot) so erosion can be mitigated. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? -4 -06/09 \\SMSVAULT2013\Vault\PAOJECTS\2012 · SMS\12305.01 American legend Renton\City of Renton\T0\130215 Site Ptan Entillement\8.Sx11\ALC envchlst.doc About 95%. The impeNious surfaces before and after construction is equal. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2. AIR Silt fencing and any exposed grade cuts can be protected by plastic sheets. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust during demolition, odors and auto exhaust. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Not known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Use water to suppress dust, install barriers/silt fences around potentially dusty activities 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None known. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Does not apply. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Does not apply. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Does not apply. . 5 -06/09 \\SMSVAUL T2013\Vault\PROJECTS\2012 -SMS\12305.01 American Legend Renton\City of Renton\T0\130215 Site Plan Entitlemenl\8.5x11\ALC envchlst.doc 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. Not known. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Not known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Does not apply. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Roof runoff and site drains route directly to the storm system. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. It's possible that minor quantities of waste material may enter the ground. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Impervious surface areas slope to drains. Please see civil plans for drainage plans. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _L deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _L evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _x_ shrubs _X_ grass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other . 6. 06/09 \\SMSVAULT2013\Vault\PROJECTS\2012 -SMS\12305.01 American Legend Renton\City of Renton\T0\130215 Site Plan Entitlement\8.5x11\ALC envchlst.doc __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? See Landscape plans for details, 2 existing maple trees will be removed and replaced. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other birds Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other---------- Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ______ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not known c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain Not known d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric energy for heating and natural gas for running equipment and manufacturing. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No, adjacent properties are far enough that it's not an issue. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Insulation of new building addition to reduce heat loss and gain, Energy Star lighting, high efficiency appliances, high water efficiency faucets, toilets & showerheads -7-06/09 \\SMSVAUL T2013\Vault\PROJECTS\2012 -SMS\12305.01 American Legend Renton\City of Renton\T0\130215 Site Plan Entitlement\8.5x11\ALC envchlstdoc 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not known. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Does not apply. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Does not apply. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term: construction noises from 7am to 5pm Monday through Friday. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction work is to be restricted during standard business hours. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The northern and southern portions of the existing warehouse contain the fur work spaces (fur treatment, work areas and storage). The existing 2· story office space is in the middle, adjacent to the existing electrical vault. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not known. c. Describe any structures on the site. The existing warehouse is a concrete tilt-up structure spanning 900'x160'. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No structures will be demolished. The existing main entrance storefront, ramp and stairs will be removed . • 8 -06/09 \\SMSVAULT2013\Vault\PROJECTS\2012 -SMS\12305.01 American Legend Renton\City of Renton\T0\130215 Site Plan Entitlement\B.5x11\ALC envchlst.doc e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Heavy Industrial (IH) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Employment Area Valley (EAV) g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Not known. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 40 people j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? O people k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Does not apply. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Does not apply. 9. HOUSING -Does not apply. a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. . 9. 06/09 \\SMSVAUL T2013\Vault\PROJECTS\2012 -SMS\12305.01 American Legend Renton\City ot Renton\T0\130215 Site Plan Entitlement\8.5x11\ALC envchlst.doc 35' (Elevator penthouse) b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Does not apply. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Typical office interior lighting during regular business hours. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not known. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not known. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Existing Sport Court is on site. There's a Kickboxing and Martial Arts facility 'h mile west, and a Casino 'h mile east. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Does not apply. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION -Does not apply. a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. -10 -06/09 \\$MSVAUL T2013\Vault\PROJECTS\2012 · SMS\12305.01 American legend Renton\City of Renton\T0\130215 Site Plan Entitlement\8.5x11\ALC envchlst.doc c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. East Rainier Ave South, Route 167, and SW 43'0 Street b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Bus lines #153 and 161 are located 1 block away on Lind Ave SW c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 232 car parking spaces + 4 truck parking spaces. The project eliminates 10 parking spaces d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Does not apply. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Number of vehicular trips per day to increase by 6 g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Not known. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not known. 16. UTILITIES -11 -06/09 \\SMSVAUL T2013\Vault\PAOJECTS\2012 -SMS\ 12305.01 American Legend Renton\City of Renton\TO\ 130215 Site Plan Entitlement\8.5x11\ALC envchlst.doc a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. All utilities are available at site, except septic system. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. All existing utilities to remain for the office expansion. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true, correct, and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent Signature:...., 4 /~ Name Printed: Date: · 12 • 06/09 \\SMSVAULT2013\Vault\?ROJECTS\2012 · SMS\12305.01 American legend Renton\City of Renton\T0\130215 Site Plan Entitlement\8.5x11\ALC envchlst.doc Form WA-S (6/76) Commitment Face Page COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued by File No.: NCS-S67281-WA1 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY First American Title Insurance Company, herein called the Company, for valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of btle insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagor of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of the Commitment or by subsecuent endorsement. This Commitment if preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of ti~e insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized officer or agent. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this commitment to be signed and sealed, to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By-Laws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date." First American Title Insurance Company Au~-President By: Attest: By: /J1 ~/__ ~ Secretary ~"T ~ Countersigned City of Renton Planning Division FE_B l 9 tU13 Rrst American litle Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment $ 1" /,.MF. I( I ~ File No.: NCS-567281-WAI Page No. I First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services 818 Stewart Street, Suite 800, Seattle, WA 98101 (206)728-0400 -(800)526-7544 FAX (206)448-6348 To: Mike Cooper (206)615-3107 mcooper@firstam.com Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc. 2009 Minor Avenue East Seattle, WA 98102-3513 Attn: Jeffrey J. McManus SCHEDULE A 1. Commitment Date: September 18, 2012 at 7:30 A.M. 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Standard Owner's Coverage $ Proposed Insured: To Follow AMOUNT To Follow $ Linda Horne (206)615-3057 lhorne@firstam.com File No.: NCS-567281-WAl Your Ref No.: Job #2000135.01 PREMIUM TAX To Follow $ To Follow 3. The estate or interest in the land described on Page 2 herein is Fee Simple, and title thereto is at the effective date hereof vested in: American Legend Cooperative, a Wisconsin cooperative association 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: The land referred to in this report is described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. First American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment EXHIBIT'A' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: File No.: NCS-567281-WAI Page No. 2 PARCELS A AND B, CHY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NO. 063-90 RECORDED DECEMBER 19, 1990 UNDER RECORDING NO. 9012199001 RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. First American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment SCHEDULE B -SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the Requirements to be complied with: File No.: NCS-567281-WAl Page No. 3 Item (A) Payment to or for the account of the Granters or Mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Item (B) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record. Item (C) Pay us the premiums, fees and charges for the policy. Item (D) You must tell us in writing the name of anyone not referred to in this Commitment who will get an interest in the land or who will make a loan on the land. We may then make additional requirements or exceptions SCHEDULE B -SECTION 2 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS The Policy or Policies to be issued will contain Exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. B. Any facts, rights, interest, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of person in possession thereof. C. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. D. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. E. (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) Water rights, claims or title to water; whether or not the matters excepted under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records; (4) Indian Tribal Codes or Regulations, Indian Treaty or Aboriginal Rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. F. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, materials or medical assistance theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, construction, tap or reimbursement charges/costs for sewer, water, garbage or electricity. H. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgages thereon covered by this Commitment. Rrst American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment SCHEDULE B • SECTION 2 ( continued) SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS File No.: NCS-567281-WAl Page No. 4 1. Lien of the Real Estate Excise Sales Tax and Surcharge upon any sale of said premises, if unpaid. As of the date herein, the excise tax rate for the City of Renton is at 1.78%. Levy/ Area Code: 2100 For all transactions recorded on or after July 1, 2005: • A fee of $10.00 will be charged on all exempt transactions; • A fee of $5.00 will be charged on all taxable transactions in addition to the excise tax due. 2. General Taxes for the year 2012. Tax Account No.: Amount Billed: Amount Paid: Amount Due: Assessed Land Value: Assessed Improvement Value: (Affects Parcel A) 3. General Taxes for the year 2012. Tax Account No.: Amount Billed: Amount Paid: Amount Due: Assessed Land Value: Assessed Improvement Value: (Affects Parcel B) 125380-0090-06 $ 10,952.60 $ 5,476.30 $ 5,476.30 $ 818,600.00 $ 1,000.00 125380-0040-07 $ 76,085.26 $ 38,042.63 $ 38,042.63 $ 2,554,400.00 $ 3,185,500.00 4. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: ' Recording Information: August 16, 1976 under Recording No. 7608160613 In Favor of: City of Renton For: Underground water line Affects: (Parcel A) as described therein. 5. Restrictions, conditions, dedications, notes, easements and provisions, if any, as contained and/or delineated on the face of the Plat of Burlington Northern Orillia Industrial Park of Renton Division I recorded in Volume 108 of Plats, Pages 12 and 13, in King County, Washington. Release of easement recorded May 3, 1979 under Recording Number 7905030471, as to a portion of the North 10 feet of Lot 4 and the South 10 feet of Lot 9. Rrst American Title Insurance Company • Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment File No.: NCS-567281-WAI Page No. s 6. Easement and the terms and conditions referenced therein, including, but not limited to, the following: 7. 8. Reserved By: Glacier Park Company, a Minnesota corporation Purpose: Area Affected: Dated: Recorded: Recording Number: Railroad easement As described therein January 29, 1979 March 16, 1979 7903160858 Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: March 16, 1979 under Recording No. 7903160860 In Favor of: City of Renton, a municipal corporation For: Roadway and public utilities Affects: as described therein. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: August 8, 1979 under Recording No. 7908080721 In Favor of: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Washington For: Affects: corporation An underground electric distribution system as described therein. Toe terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Amendment of Easement and Confirmation Agreement" recorded December 4, 2006 as Recording No. 20061204000285 of Official Records. 9. Restrictions, conditions, dedications, notes, easements and provisions, if any, as contained and/or delineated on the face of the Short Plat No. 063-90 recorded December 19, 1990 under Recording No. 9012199001, in King County, Washington. 10. Easement, induding terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: March 4, 1991 under Recording No. 9103040924 For: Parking easement Affects: (Parcel A) as described therein 11. Conditions, notes, easements, provisions and/or encroachments contained and/or delineated on the face of the Survey recorded May 15, 1991 under Recording No. 9105159006 of surveys, in King County, Washington. 12. According to the application for title insurance, title is to vest in American Legend Cooperative, a Wisconsin cooperative association. We are unable to determine the nature of said entity and require further information prior to closing. Rrst American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment File No.: NCS-567281-WA! Page No. 6 13. Title to vest in an incoming owner whose name is not disclosed. Such name must be furnished to us so that a name search may be made. 14. Unrecorded leaseholds, if any, rights of vendors and security agreement on personal property and rights of tenants, and secured parties to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term. Arst American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment INFORMATIONAL NOTES • File No.: NCS-567281-WAl Page No. 7 A. Effective January 1, 1997, and pursuant to amendment of Washington State Statutes relating to standardization of recorded documents, the following format and content requirements must be met. Failure to comply may result in rejection of the document by the recorder. B. Any sketch attached hereto is done so as a courtesy only and is not part of any @e commitment or policy. It is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and First American expressly disclaims any liability which may result from reliance made upon it. C. The description can be abbreviated as suggested below if necessary to meet standardization requirements. The full text of the description must appear in the document(s) to be insured. Parcels A & B, SP No. 063-90, Rec. 9012199001 APN: 125380-0090-06 APN: 125380-0040-07 D. A fee will be charged upon the cancellation of this Commitment pursuant to the Washington State Insurance Code and the filed Rate Schedule of the Company. END OF SCHEDULE B Rrst American Title Insurance Company . ' Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment 1 ,'MF. If I '... ('~ '/£ "'""' .,. First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services COMMITMENT Conditions and Stipulations File No.: NCS-567281-WAI Page No. 8 1. The term "mortgage" when used herein shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment, other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act or reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclosure such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option, may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of Policy or Policies committed for, and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the Policy or Policies committed for and such liability is subject to the Insuring provisions, exclusion from coverage, and the Conditions and Stipulations of the form of Policy or Policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by references, and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the lien of the Insured mortgage covered hereby or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to the provisions and Conditions and Stipulations of this Commitment. First American litle Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment • The First American Corporation First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services PRIVACY POUCY We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information File No.: NCS-567281-WAl Page No. 9 In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certain information. We understand that you may be concerned about what we will do wlth such information particularly any personal or financial information. We agree that you have a right to know how we will utilize the personal information you provide to us. Therefore, together with our parent company, The First American corporation, we have adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal information. Applicability This Privacy Policy governs our use of the information which you provide to us. It does not govern the manner in which we may use information we have obtained from any other source, such as Information obtained from a public record or from another person or entity. First American has also adopted broader guidelines that govern our use of personal information regardless of its source. First American calls these guidelines its Fair Information Values, a copy of which can be found on our website at www.firstam.com. Types of Information Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing, the types of nonpublic personal Information that we may collect include: o Information we receive from you on applications, forms and in other communications to us, whether in writing, in person, by telephone or any other means; o Information about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others; and· o Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Use of Information We request information from you fur our own legitimate business purposes and not fur the benefit of any nonaffiliated party. Therefore, we will not release your information to nonaffiliated parties except: (1) as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested of us; or (2) as permitted by law. We may, however, store sudl information indefinitely, including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such information may be used for any internal purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also provide all of the types of nonpublic personal information listed above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include financial service providers, such as title insurers, property and casualty insurers, and trust and investment advisory companies, or companies involved in real estate services, sudl as appraisal companies, home warranty companies, and escrow companies. Furthermore, we may also provide all the information we collect, as described above, to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies, or to other financial Institutions with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketing agreements. Former Customers Even if you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Polley will continue to apply to you. Confidentiality and security We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your information. We restrict access to nonpublic personal Information about you to those Individuals and entities who need to know that Information to provide products or services to you. We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your information will be handled responslbly and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and First American's Fair Information Values. We currently maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. c 2001 The First American COrporation -All Rights Reserved First American Title Insurance Company February 14, 2013 File No. 12-164 American Legend Cooperative 200 SW 34th Street Renton, WA 98057 Attn: Anne Daffern, Chief Financial Officer Subject: GEOTECHNICAL REPORT American Legend Cooperative New Auction/Administration Center 200 SW 34th Street, Renton, WA Dear Ms. Daffern, PanGE© I • C D a P D a A T I D Geotechnical & Ea,thquake Engineering Consultants City of Renton Planning Division FEB 1 9 IU13 PanGEO, Inc. completed a geotechnical study to assist the project team with the design and construction of the proposed building addition at the American Legend facility in Renton, Washington. The results of our study are summarized in the attached report. In summary, based on the results of our subsurface explorations, spread footings are considered a suitable foundation system for the proposed addition. However, it should also be noted that some settlement could occur during a strong seismic event. If a higher level of performance is needed, a deep foundation system will be required. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. Please call if there are any questions regarding this report. Sincerely, Siew L. Tan, P.E. Principal Geotechnical Engineer 321.1 Eastlake J\v(:Jllll.'. [asl. Suite B Scauk. Wt\ 98102 Tel: (20(1) 262-0J70 Fa:\: (206) 2(i2-0374 Geotechnical Report American Legend New Auction/ Administrative Center February 14, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................... I 3.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS ....................................................................................... I 4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ............................................................................................. 2 4.1 SOIL ....................................................................................................................................... 2 4.2 GROUNDWATER ..................................................................................................................... 3 5.0 DESIGN RECOMMEND A TIO NS ....................................................................................... 3 5.] SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS ..................................................................................................... 3 5.1.1 Site Class ........................................................................................................................ 3 5.1. 2 Soil Liquefaction ............................................................................................................ 4 5.1.3 Seismic Settlement .......................................................................................................... 5 5.2 FOUNDATION .......................................................................................................................... 5 5. 2.1 Allowable Bearing Pressure .......................................................................................... 6 5.2.2 Lateral Resistance .......................................................................................................... 7 5.2.3 Foundation Performance ............................................................................................... 7 5.3 FLOORS SLABS······················································································································· 7 5.4 RETAINING WALLS ................................................................................................................ 8 5.4.1 Lateral Earth Pressures ................................................................................................. 8 5.4.2 Lateral Resistance .......................................................................................................... 8 5.4.3 Wall Backfill ................................................................................................................... 8 6.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................................ 9 6.1 SUBGRADE PREPARATION ...................................................................................................... 9 6.2 IMPACTS TO ADJACENT BUILDINGS ........................................................................................ 9 6.3 TEMPORARY EXCAVATIONS ................................................................................................... 9 6.4 STRUCTURAL FILL AND COMPACTION .................................................................................. 10 6.5 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................................................... ] 0 6.6 WET WEATHER EARTHWORK AND EROSION CONSIDERATIONS ........................................... ] 0 7.0 LIMITATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 11 8.0 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................... 14 ATTACHMENTS: Vicinity Map Site and Exploration Plan Figure I Figure 2 Appendix A Summary CPT Logs (CPT-1 and CPT-2) 12-164 american legend -geo report 02-14-2013 11 PanGEO, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AMERICAN LEGEND NEW AUCTION/ ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER 200 SW 34TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical study for the proposed addition at the American Legend facility located in Renton, Washington. Our scope of work included collecting and reviewing published geology maps, conducting a site reconnaissance, advancing two cone penetration test soundings, and performing engineering analyses to develop the geotechnical recommendations outlined in this report. 2.0 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is located at 200 SW 34th Street in Renton, Washington. It is in an industrial area situated south ofl-405 and west ofSR-167. The approximate location of the project site is shown in the attached Figure 1. The site grade is essentially level. An existing warehouse building with paved parking and driveways currently occupies the site. The floor of the warehouse is approximately 4 feet higher than the surround surface grade. Based on our review of as-built foundation plans, we understand that the existing building is supported on conventional footings sized using allowable bearing pressures of 2,000 and 3,500 psf. Observations made during our site visits indicate that the building foundation system has performed adequately, with no signs of significant settlement. We also did not observe obvious cracking on existing pavement. We understand that a proposed addition will be constructed on the west side of the existing building, just south of the existing entry to the administrative office (see Figure 2). The addition will be a two-story metal frame structure with a footprint of about l 0,000 square feet. We also understand that the addition's lower floor will match the existing building floor, with a crawl space below the floor. Ramps or stairs will be used outside of addition to access the proposed lower floor. 3.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS Two cone penetration tests (CPTs) were conducted at the site on October 12, 2012. Locations of the CPTs were located in the field by taping from existing features and are indicated on the attached Site and Exploration Plan (Figure 2). The CPTs were performed by Northwest Cone Geotechnical Report American Legend-New Auction I Administrative Center February 14, 2013 Exploration of Snohomish, Washington, under a subcontract to PanGEO. Both CPTs were advanced to a depth of about 80 feet below the ground surface. The subcontractor backfilled the sounding holes using sand and bentonite, and patched the surface with asphalt cold patch. A CPT consists of pushing an instrumented cone, approximately I-inch in diameter, into a soil deposit from a truck mounted reaction frame, and measuring the resistance and pore water pressure on the tip and side of the cone. Higher tip resistance measurements indicate the soil deposit has a higher strength or density than lower tip resistance measurements. The resistances to continuous penetration encountered by the cone tip and adjacent friction sleeve also exhibit high sensitivity to changes in soil type, which may be correlated to differing soil types and strength parameters. Summary logs of the CPTs are included in Appendix A of this report for reference. 4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 4.1 SOIL According to the Geologic map of the Renton Quadrangle (Mullineaux, D.R., 1965), the site is underlain by recent river alluvium that generally consists of loose to medium dense sand and soft to medium stiff silt and clay. The subsurface conditions encountered in the CPTs are generally consistent with the mapped stratigraphy, and encountered fill overlying recent alluvium. A summary of the soil units encountered in the explorations is provided below (approximate depths are measured from the existing pavement surface). Detailed subsurface information is provided on the CPT sounding logs included in Appendix A. Fill: The upper approximately 5 to 6 feet of the soil profile consists of very dense to dense sand with variable amounts of silt and gravel. We interpret this layer as fill that was likely placed during the construction of existing warehouse. The fill appeared well compacted. Alluvium: Below the fill layer, CPTs generally encountered a sequence of loose to medium dense sand to silty sand, and soft to stiff sandy silt to clayey silt with occasional thin clay layers. This soil unit extended from below the fill to the termination depth of the CPTs at about 80 feet below existing grade. We interpreted this layer as alluvium. This unit is anticipated to exhibit medium strength and low to moderate compressibility. 12-164 american legend -geo report 02-14-2013 2 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Report American Legend -New Auction/ Administrative Center February 14, 2013 4.2 GROUNDWATER The groundwater level at the site was estimated based on the results of pore water dissipation tests conducted in both CPTs. The test results are included in Appendix A, following the summary CPT logs. The test results from both CPTs were consistent, and indicate that the groundwater was at approximately 9.3 to 9.4 feet deep in both CPTs. However, the groundwater level is anticipated to fluctuate, and is expected to be the highest during the winter/spring months. 5.0 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS 5.1.1 Site Class We anticipate that the seismic design of the building will be accomplished in accordance with the 2009 International Building Code (!BC). The !BC seismic design parameters are in part based on the site soil conditions and site classifications. According to Table 1613.5.2 of the 2009 !BC, the site soil can be classified as Site Class F because of its liquefaction potential during a strong seismic event. However, footnote "b" in Tables 1613.5.3(1) and 1613.5.3(2) indicates that the values of site coefficients (Fa and Fb) for Site Class F shall be determined in accordance with Section 11.4.7 of ASCE-7, which states that "A site response analysis shall be performed in accordance with Section 21.1 for structures on Site Class F, unless the exception to Section 20.3. l is applicable." Section 20.3.1 (1) of ASCE-7 states that "For structures having fundamental periods of vibration equal to or less than 0.5 second, site response analysis is not required to determine spectral accelerations for liquefiable soils. Rather, a site class is permitted to be determined in accordance with Section 20. 3 and the corresponding values of Fa and r1, determined from Tables 11.4-1 and 11.4-2." In other words, for structures with a period of vibration equal to or less than 0.5 second and situated on liquefiable soils, the IBC/ASCE-7 exception allows the values ofF, and F b for liquefiable soils be taken equal to the values of site class determined without regard to soil liquefaction. Based on the proposed two-story structure, we anticipate that the vibration period for the proposed addition to be less than 0.5 second. Therefore, based on the soil conditions encountered at the site, it is our opinion that Site Class D is appropriate for the project. 12-164 american legend -geo report 02-14-2013 3 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Report American Legend-New Auction/ Administrative Center February 14, 2013 The following table provides seismic design parameters for the site that are in conformance with the 2009 edition of the International Building Code (!BC) with a Site Class D, which specifies a design earthquake having a 2% probability of occurrence in 50 years (return interval of 2,475 years), and the 2002 USGS seismic hazard maps. The spectral response accelerations were obtained from the USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Interpolated Probabilistic Ground Motion website (2008 data) for the project latitude and longitude. Table 1 -2009 IBC Seismic Design Parameters Spectral Spectral Design Control Design Acceleration Acceleration Site Spectral Periods PGA Site at 0.2 sec. at 1.0 sec. Coefficients Response (sec.) (Sos/2.5) Class (g) (g) Parameters Ss S1 Fn Fv Sos SDI To Ts D 1.40 0.48 1.0 1.5 0.93 0.49 0.10 0.52 0.37 5.1.2 Soil Liquefaction Liquefaction occurs when saturated sands are subjected to cyclic loading, and causes the pore water pressure to increase in the sand thereby reducing the inter-granular stresses. As the inter- granular stresses are reduced, the shearing resistance of the sand decreases. If pore pressures develop to the point where the effective stresses acting between the grains become zero, the soil particles will be in suspension and behave like a viscous fluid. Typically loose, saturated sand that have a low enough permeability to prevent drainage during cyclic loading, have the greatest potential for liquefaction, while dense soils with high silt or clay contents have a lesser potential. Potential effects of soil liquefaction include temporary loss/reduction of foundation capacity and settlement. According to the Sensitive Areas Map by City of Renton, the site 'is designated as a potential liquefaction area. The results of our subsurface explorations also indicated liquefaction prone soils exist below the site. Given this information, the potential for liquefaction was investigated for soils underlying the site. The liquefaction potential of the site soils was evaluated using the procedure proposed by Robertson and Wride (1998) for CPT data and the 1996 and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops 12-164 american legend -geo report 02-14-2013 4 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Report American Legend -New Auction / Administrative Center February 14, 2013 (Youd et al., 2001). Using these methods, the factor of safety against liquefaction was calculated by comparing the cyclic resistance ratio of a soi I under a certain earthquake magnitude to the cyclic stress ratio that is expected to be induced by the equivalent ground motion. Along with the subsurface information gathered from our five CPT explorations, we utilized a 2,475-year design earthquake (per IBC) with a magnitude of 7.5 and a design peak ground acceleration of 0.38g to assess liquefaction potential. Groundwater was assumed to be 9 feet below grade in our analyses. The results of our analyses indicate that the potential for liquefaction is high in the majority of the saturated soils below the site to depths of 50 to 60 feet below the ground surface. Although theoretical computations may suggest that liquefaction could extend below a depth of 50 feet, as a practical matter, effects of soil liquefaction occurring deeper than about 50 to 60 feet are not likely to be manifest at the ground surface. 5.1.3 Seismic Settlement Earthquake-induced settlement should be anticipated at the site during a strong seismic event. Estimation of seismic settlement is difficult at best, and in our opinion, the analytical procedures currently used often result in overly conservative settlement estimates. The current analytical procedures predict relatively uniform surface settlements of about 9 inches for the 2009 !BC design earthquake. Based on our evaluation of the subsurface profile of the site and our observations of ground performance in past earthquakes, particularly during the 2001 Nisqually earthquake, we estimate that 4 to 5 inches of settlement may occur during a seismic event consistent with the 2009 !BC design earthquake. Earthquakes of lower intensity, which could occur at more frequent intervals, may cause settlements which are much less than this estimate. Due to the relatively uniform nature of the liquefiable soils below the site, we anticipate the seismic settlement to be relatively uniform, with differential settlements across the proposed structure of less than 1 to 2 inches. 5.2 FOUNDATION We understand that the lower floor of the proposed addition will match the floor of the existing building, which is approximately 4 feet higher than the surrounding grade. However, we understand that a crawl space will be present below the floor, and hence no significant amount of fill will be placed. 12-164 american legend -geo report 02-14-2013 5 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Report American Legend -New Auction/ Administrative Center February 14, 2013 Based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the site, the results of our analysis, and observed performance of the existing building, it is our opinion that the shallow footings are an appropriate foundation option for the project, with the understanding that the footings could settle during a strong seismic event. To improve the seismic performance of the footings, the footings may be tied together with grade beams. This will result in a stiffer foundation system, and reduce the magnitude of potential differential settlements. Alternatively, a concrete mat or a structural slab with thicken edges may be used in lieu of a conventional footings. If a higher level of performance is desired, a deep foundation system should be considered. Studies by Naesgaard and others (1998) showed that, when designed with an adequate factor of safety against bearing capacity failure, lightly-loaded structures supported on footings founded on soil "crust" over liquefied ground generally sustained only slight damage during earthquakes. For the proposed addition, assuming the bottom of the footings or mat will be 3 to 4 feet below the existing grade, the foundation will be located at least 6 to 7 feet above the groundwater table, hence providing a non-liquefiable "crust" between the footing and the liquefiable soil. When using a relatively low design bearing pressure to size the library footing, an adequate factor of safety can be achieved. Design parameters for footings are presented in the following sections of this report. 5.2.1 Allowable Bearing Pressure We recommend that a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square feet (psf) be used for sizing the new foundation and for evaluating the existing footings. The recommended allowable bearing pressure is for dead plus live loads. The recommended bearing pressure should not be increased when design for seismic conditions. New footings should have minimum width of 24 inches. New footings should be placed at a minimum depth of 12 inches below final exterior grade. We recommend that the new footings or concrete mat bear on a minimum of 6 inches compacted structural fill to provide a more uniform support. The structural fill should extend horizontally a minimum of 6 inches beyond the edge of the foundation. 12-164 american legcnd-geo report 02-14-2013 6 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Report American Legend -New Auction I Administrative Center February 14, 2013 5.2.2 Lateral Resistance Lateral loads on the structures may be resisted by passive earth pressure developed against the embedded faces of the foundation system and by frictional resistance between the bottom of the foundation and the supporting subgrade soils. For footings or mats bearing on the compacted structural fill, a frictional coefficient of 0.35 may be used to evaluate sliding resistance developed between the concrete and the compacted subgrade soil. Passive soil resistance may be calculated using an equivalent fluid weight of 250 pcf, assuming properly compacted structural fill will be placed against the footings. The above values include a factor of safety of 1.5. Unless covered by pavements or slabs, the passive resistance in the upper 12 inches of soil should be neglected. 5.2.3 Foundation Performance Settlement for the new footings under static loading conditions is estimated to be less than about 1 inch; if a concrete mat is used, we anticipate the settlement to be less than Y, inch. During an !BC-level earthquake, we estimate that the total footing settlement due to seismic shaking may be as much as 4 to 5 inches, and the differential post-liquefaction foundation settlement is estimated to be on the order of I to I Y, inches. Some architectural and structural damages may occur as a result of the footing settlement. In our opinion, this potential damage would not significantly impede entrance or egress from the facility. 5.2.4 Footing Subgrade Preparation and Over-excavation All foundation excavations should be trimmed neat and the adequacy of foundation subgrade should be verified by a representative of PanGEO, prior to placing forms or re bar. As previously discussed, footings or concrete mats should bear on at least 6 inches of structural fill compacted to a dense condition. The exposed subgrade should be compacted to a firm and unyielding condition prior to placement of structural fill. If the exposed subgrade is soft/loose and cannot be compacted to a firm condition, they should be over-excavated down another 6 inches, and the resulting over-excavation should be backfilled with compacted structural fill. 5.3 FLOORS SLABS Conventional concrete slab-on-grade floors, where applicable, may be used for this project. The floor slabs should be supported on compacted structural fill. Interior concrete slab-on-grade 12-164 american legend -geo report 02-14-2013 7 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Report American Legend -New Auction/ Administrative Center February 14, 2013 floors should be underlain by a capillary break consisting of at least of 4 inches of pea gravel or compacted %-inch, clean crushed rock (less than 3 percent fines), or approved equivalent. The capillary break material should also have no more than IO percent passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 5 percent by weight of the material passing the U.S. Standard No. I 00 sieve. The capillary break should be placed on the subgrade that has been compacted to a dense and unyielding condition. A I 0-mil polyethylene vapor barrier should also be placed directly below the slab. We also recommend that construction joints be incorporated into the floor slab to control cracking. 5.4 RETAINING WALLS Retaining walls, where needed, should be designed using the parameters discussed below. 5.4.1 Lateral Earth Pressures Concrete cantilever walls should be designed for an equivalent fluid pressure of 35 pcf for level backfills behind the walls. Walls should also be designed for an additional uniform lateral pressure of 7H psf for seismic loading, where H corresponds to the buried depth of the wall. The recommended lateral pressures assume that the backfill behind the wall consists of a free draining and properly compacted fill. 5.4.2 Lateral Resistance Lateral forces from seismic loading and unbalanced lateral earth pressures may be resisted by a combination of passive earth pressures acting against the embedded portions of the foundations and by friction acting on the base of the foundations. Passive resistance values may be determined using an equivalent fluid weight of 250 pcf. This value includes a factor of safety of 1.5, assuming the footing is poured against properly compacted structural fill adjacent to the sides of footing. A friction coefficient of 0.35 may be used to determine the frictional resistance at the base of the footings. The coefficient includes a factor safety of 1.5. 5.4.3 Wall Backfill In our opinion, the existing on-site soil should not be re-used as wall backfill. Imported, well- grade, granular material should be used for wall backfill. Wall backfill should be moisture conditioned to within about 3 percent of optimum moisture content, placed in loose, horizontal 12-164 american legend -geo report 02-14-2013 8 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Report American Legend -New Auction/ Administrative Center February 14, 2013 lifts less than 8 inches in thickness, and systematically compacted to a dense and relatively unyielding condition and to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density, as determined using test method ASTM D 1557. Within 5 feet of the wall, the backfill should be compacted with hand-operated equipment to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density. 6.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 6.1 SUBGRADE PREPARATION Prior to foundation construction, ex1stmg asphalt pavement within the proposed addition footprint should be stripped off and removed from the site. Prior to structural fill placement, the exposed subgrade should be compacted with a heavy roller to a dense and unyielding condition. 6.2 IMPACTS TO ADJACENT BUILDINGS The proposed addition will be constructed to match the existing warehouse to the east. Footing design information of the adjacent warehouse building should be obtained prior to final design of the proposed addition. The footing elevations of the new addition should be carefully designed in such way not to surcharge or undermine the adjacent existing warehouse footings. 6.3 TEMPORARY EXCAVATIONS Temporary excavations will be less than 3 to 4 feet for the foundation construction. We anticipate the excavations to mainly encounter loose to medium dense old structural fill. All temporary excavations should be performed in accordance with Part N of WAC (Washington Administrative Code) 296-155. The contractor is responsible for maintaining safe excavation slopes and/or shoring. All temporary excavations deeper than 4 feet should be sloped or shored. In the event that temporary excavations deeper than 4 feet are needed, for plarming purposes, they should be sloped 11-1: 1 V or flatter. The temporary cut slopes should be re-evaluated in the field during construction based on actual observed soil conditions, and may need to be flattered in the wet reasons. We also recommend that heavy construction equipment, building materials, excavated soil, and vehicular traffic should not be allowed within a distance equal to 1/3 the slope height from the top of any excavation. 12-164 american legend -geo report 02-14-2013 9 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Report American Legend-New Auction/ Administrative Center February 14, 2013 6.4 STRUCTURAL FILL AND COMPACTION Below the foundation, we recommend the structural fill consist of crushed surfacing base course (CSBC): City of Seattle Type 2 material (I W' minus crushed rock). Below the slab, we recommend using imported material such as City of Seattle Type 17, WSDOT Gravel Borrow or other approved equivalent. The structural fill should be moisture conditioned to within about 3 percent of optimum moisture content, placed in loose, horizontal lifts less than 8 inches in thickness, and systematically compacted to a dense and unyielding condition, and to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density, as determined using test method ASTM D 1557. 6.5 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS Surface runoff can be controlled during construction by careful grading practices. This may include the construction of shallow, upgrade perimeter ditches or low earthen berms to collect runoff and prevent water from entering the excavation. All collected water should be directed to a positive and permanent discharge system such as a storm sewer. It should be noted that some of the site soils are prone to surficial erosion. Special care should be taken to avoid surface water on open cut excavations, and exposed slopes should be protected with plastic sheeting. Permanent control of surface water and roof runoff should be incorporated in the final grading design. In addition to these sources, irrigation and rain water infiltrating into any landscape and/or planter areas adjacent to paved areas or building foundations should also be controlled. Water should not be allowed to pond immediately adjacent to buildings or paved areas. All collected runoff should be directed into conduits that carry the water away from pavements or the structure and into storm drain systems or other appropriate outlets. Adequate surface gradients should be incorporated into the grading design such that surface runoff is directed away from structures. 6.6 WET WEATHER EARTHWORK AND EROSION CONSIDERATIONS The site soils contain a moderate to high amount of fines, and are therefore considered moisture sensitive. As a result, it may be more economical to perform earthwork in the drier summer months to reduce the potential of site soils becoming soft due to excessive moisture. Any softened soi ls should be removed and replaced with structural fill. General recommendations relative to earthwork performed in wet weather or in wet conditions are presented below: 12-164 american legend -geo report 02-14-2013 10 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Report American Legend -New Auction I Administrative Center February 14, 2013 o Because site soils are considered moisture sensitive, all foundation surfaces should be protected against inclement weather. o Earthwork should be performed in small areas to minimize subgrade exposure to wet weather. Excavation or the removal of unsuitable soil should be followed promptly by the placement and compaction of structural fill. The size and type of construction equipment used may have to be limited to reduce soil disturbance. o During wet weather, the allowable fines content of the structural fill should be reduced to no more than 5 percent by weight based on the portion passing '!.-inch sieve. The fines should be non-plastic. o The ground surface within the construction area should be graded to promote run-off of surface water and to prevent the ponding of water, and to prevent surface water from entering the excavations. o Bales of straw and/or geotextile silt fences should be strategically located to control erosion and the movement of sediment. Erosion control measures should be installed along all the property boundaries. o Excavation slopes and soils stockpiled on site should be covered with plastic sheeting. o Under no circumstances should soil be left uncompacted and exposed to moisture. 7.0 LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for use by American Legend Cooperative and the project team. Recommendations contained in this report are based on a site reconnaissance, a subsurface exploration program, review of pertinent subsurface information, and our understanding of the project. The study was performed using a mutually agreed-upon scope of work. Variations in soil conditions may exist between the explorations and the actual conditions underlying the site. The nature and extent of soil variations may not be evident until construction occurs. If any soil conditions are encountered at the site that are different from those described in this report, we should be notified immediately to review the applicability of our recommendations. Additionally, we should also be notified to review the applicability of our recommendations if there are any changes in the project scope. 12-164 american legend -geo report 02-14-2013 II PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Report American Legend-New Auction/ Administrative Center February 14, 2013 The scope of our work does not include services related to construction safety precautions. Our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractors' methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. Additionally, the scope of our work specifically excludes the assessment of environmental characteristics, particularly those involving hazardous substances. We are not mold consultants nor are our recommendations to be interpreted as being preventative of mold development. A mold specialist should be consulted for all mold-related issues. This report may be used only by the client and for the purposes stated, within a reasonable time from its issuance. Land use, site conditions (both off and on-site), or other factors including advances in our understanding of applied science, may change over time and could materially affect our findings. Therefore, this report should not be relied upon after 24 months from its issuance. PanGEO should be notified if the project is delayed by more than 24 months from the date of this report so that we may review the applicability of our conclusions considering the time lapse. It is the client's responsibility to see that all parties to this project, including the designer, contractor, subcontractors, etc., are made aware of this report in its entirety. The use of information contained in this report for bidding purposes should be done at the contractor's option and risk. Any party other than the client who wishes to use this report shall notify PanGEO of such intended use and for permission to copy this report. Based on the intended use of the report, PanGEO may require that additional work be performed and that an updated report be reissued. Noncompliance with any of these requirements will release PanGEO from any liability resulting from the use this report. Within the limitation of scope, schedule and budget, PanGEO engages in the practice of geotechnical engineering and endeavors to perform its services in accordance with generally accepted professional principles and practices at the time the Report or its contents were prepared. No warranty, express or implied, is made. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. Please feel free to contact our office with any questions you have regarding our study, this report, or any geotechnical engineering related project issues. 12-164 american legend -geo report 02-14-2013 12 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Report American Legend -New Auction / Administrative Center February 14, 2013 Sincerely, PanGEO, Inc. Chien-Lin (Johnny) Chen, P.E. Project Geotechnical Engineer 12-164 american legend -geo report 02-14-2013 13 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Report American Legend -New Auction/ Administrative Center February 14, 2013 8.0 REFERENCES International Building Code (IBC), 2009, International Code Council. Mullineaux, D.R., 1965, Geologic map of the Renton quadrangle, King County, Washington, U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-405, scale 1 :24,000. Naesgaard, E., Mayne, P. and Ven Huizen, G., 1998, Behavior of Light Structures Founded on Soil 'Crust' over Liquefied Ground. In Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics III, edited by Panos Dakoulas, Mishac Yegian and Robert D. Holtz, p. 422-433. Robertson, P.K. and Wride, C.E., 1998, Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Ottawa, 35(3), 442-459. Youd, T.L. et al., 2001, Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils: Journal ofGeotechnical and Environmental Engineering, ASCE, V. 127, No. 10, p. 817-833. 12-164 american legend-geo report 02-14-2013 14 PanGEO, Inc. Not To Scale Image Source: Google Maps. );,l---------~---------~----------------1 f ; PanGE@ INCORPOAATaD American Legend 200 SW 34th Street Renton, Washington VICINITY MAP Project No. Figure No. 12-164 ~ PROPERTY LINE . d! I -.1:-1 • j i ::r:=r:-j ,~ -r--'r ---t:..._1 n r::-r: 5 I i:::J l P ------- ~·--i-,-,i,21.13· , , , , , , • , ,-,--.--:r:-::E:5"---2r5-:--¥¥?,1,..LI.:n::;L ----. ,,l-, I 1 -1--r-1 i / :.:f.±L..-I --I , _ _,--i _.._._.__.__~-. ~ .. ·:::r-=_......... ,~ I I STINGRAn.ROAD™EJ ~-!,,J -, ,_. ~-:L· ::.::r~.:~ -.. ~-!~ --. c-'~'--:,.:':'.",:-..:,,:,:;::..:-,-.. ~~>I~ .... ~ ·:"i ~".,...'-:~.l.>.., . J. ,,., , .... " ;=,,,, '· J . ~ r ·~:.J; . 1· . • Q t------.-....---' ; i ~-. . . · .. ', . . . ; :·· :~~~= ' '~~( RCEI B · ii! i5_ .. · . • ... ~--• ..,.---. Of J· ('~I' . --:-;-I:! i~,.-~ / .. . ·.,,,'. :---,,,--.: -., ij .... . w . . ·; -... ---qr.:~· ~4-1 -• 1~ . ·a!> :: .,:.~ ,:.:. -~~~-~-,-~:::,_ ,""-,'~ ·1 !iii • •. . .. !l . , ·.:-. , 1 : ·· ... , ,. J, , · -t .. + , ! / i ffi ·.. ,' " ~ ... :;, !-~~~ -: 'I ·1-· ~ :, .,., . ~ ,,,. "'"1:c-11':f' ~1 . ii · · :-· -~" .. · .. : .,. ~=~--1 -=~:-~~~1 . I { PROPOSED i.stORV ' , ---· __ .J,.~11_ • .. : .-~ i : ~ . ,• • • I~ 'l:, .. .. .i ' -.,_ .. 10,000SOFTADDl110N ., , • .-'~,t.' . •• · · ~-' : : __ ... --f.!:i:~· -:, _._.-J I -"I" ~ ··,,.:.L..:;_• l ~· .... ,..-J \ ·· · ... ,t •••. .,.·.\L--:.-...z 6 i ___ ...,.. -·~.~ ... --··• ,. ') _..,. " CPT-1 i· -....:.:.:..,.:..~.-! ~ •· {-; .• :: .•• :;• , •. :"· ; 1 i---··--, 1 ~---ff}.-._,,., ..:~· • ··t ::..,,.. "·~ 'I .-it .. :;,:~ ~.· .. ~-;···1 .. l •• • • -. • • ,--.. .,,-· --.; :0 ---T q",s:,t11.,, &: J ' r r •' •• • • • • • '·, ,. ·• •• • ,.._ ...: .-.-.~,=;--......-..-i'! •• ~·-l'f-1'1ill' . . ___ ,, ·a, ,,,, '?. , ·t -·1.,., ,: ·,:, \,' ' < ,:.,,, , :]' , ___ • ,.·,=o-\ . I , -0 "',, t ... ;, ~ .,..._ '.,' H,:•c •. •.~ '"5 :.; :•., < ••• ; ' :...; ,_~ .. •J: ;;;, °'" o• \----~-:l'lJ u!' ~ ~ _._, --~ : .. ::::'=. . ·--~~ • .-. ;:.. ~:_: ~=.L .. ·.. ~:--.:.~· .. :.• i,,,,,.~,a""'f"'" ;___ -~-,i_t{J, .• '7 • . ~-(-· ; u,-.... ::e>;~, 'c":_l__ .... , ·= };::: ~. I 0~'1;'~-~ . ;;_;:~;~t~;~~~----~2.-=~;_:t~t:~-_tf~_l __ A --[_J ___ .;-___ .. [~~---~~-~--~--:::... < "':'!c-~--=-~::;'.,,_--j~~-;~~:.:~ ~;~-~:=::~~~~::-~~~~·~m:~-~<f~=~=:~~~·~:::~::·-::_~~":=::~~~-=~=~=-·~~~~;.:~; :-~~-:~~;~:) / I -Er Approximate Scale: 1":50ft PflOTEC1'ED DURING CONSTRUC110N ,..,....,,..... ...,,_ 1_ ) I Legend: CPT-1 f:::i CPT Designation and Approximate Location PanGE@ I • C e •• e e A T • e American Legend 200 SW 34th Street Renton, WA SITE AND EX PL ORATION PLAN rO,ect No. 12-16' r,gureNo PanGeo Depth (ft) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 Tip Resistance QcTSF U : ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ~ -1----1---~-- I I I I I I I I ' ' --1----r ---r ---, --- ' ___ 1 ___ 1 __ ' ' ' ___ J. __ D 1 sensitive fine grained D 2 organic material 03 clay lnSitu Engineering Opera(l)Gerdes Sounding: CPT-1 Cone Used: DPG1186 300 Friction Ratio Fs/Qc (%) 0 6 r-1 --i-;-r ' ' ' I ___ _I_J_l ' ' ' ' I I I I t__ .J_.l_L ' ' r Maximum Depth = 80.22 feet 04 Os 06 silty clay to clay clayey silt to silty clay sandy silt to clayey silt :nil h1>h::1vinr lvni> ::inrl S.PT h::i<:Prl nn rl::it::i frnm I IRr..HlR'.'\ CPT Datem~10/12/2012 11 :02:03 AM Location: American Legend Renton Job Number: 12-164 Pore Pressure PwPSI -20 70 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' -1-1-l--I -1-1 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ,-,,,-,-1 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I 'S' : I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' -I -f-+· ·l -I -I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I -,-, rr1,-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ;~II 1 I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' Soil Behavior Type* Zone: UBC-1983 0 12 l I l I I l I I I I I I I I '' '' ~1++ ''' ''' j " I I I I I It I I I I I I I I I It '' ' ' ' ' ' ' ill!! ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ,' ,· ,:r ' ' ' I: ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ''' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '' ' r1-1-11tj Tr I I I I I I I I '' ! I I I I I I I I I I ''' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' HS '' '' '' ' ' ' '' /II I I I I 11: -hr ''' ''' I I I I ! I :J I I ''' ''' ' ''' :': :,J: I• I 1 I 1 1 I Lccu.u a a , IL I! I I I I I I I I I I I I' 1 I I I I I I I I I I I, I if' A'::: ' Depth Increment= 0.164 feet SPTN' 60% Hammer 0 60 ' ' -_I_ ' -T ' ' ' ' t '°Kl·"-' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' )' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' r -,--, -, -r _I __ I_ ' ' -----1--f -I ' ' ' ' 1-,-1-r ' ' ' L _I_ .J .l _ L ' ' ' D 7 silty sand to sandy silt 0 8 sand to silty sand 0 9 sand D 10 gravelly sand to sand D 11 very stiff fine grained(*) 0 12 sand to clayey sand(·) Pre-drilled 1 toot Depth (ft) 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Tip Resistance QcTSF -------- ' ' --I--I - ' ' ' ' --:---~ ---~--T -- Q ' ' ' ' ---'--- ' : ' ' ' ' ' -1-------1 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' --,---,--1---r-- I J I I : ___ j ___ % __ i __ ' '_) ' ' ' ' ' ' I~: D 1 sensitive fine grained D 2 organic material 03 clay lnSitu Engineering PanGeo Op, r: Gerdes Sounding: CPT-2 Cone Used: DPG1186 300 0 Friction Ratio Fs/Qc (%) lJ: ~: ;rr, ~: I 6 ,~1 1--i=-1- ' ' -__j______(___j -1-..../ -.. -.. ' ' ' -, -i -T ' I_ _ _I_ ' I I I I I L _I _ _J _ ..l _ L ' ' Maximum Depth = 80.05 feet 04 05 Os silty clay to clay clayey silt to silty clay sandy silt to clayey silt CPTDate .e: 10/12/2012 9:25:46 AM Location: American Legend Renton Job Number: 12-164 Pore Pressure PwPSI Soil Behavior Type* Zone: UBC-1983 SPTN' 60% Hammer -20 70 0 12 0 60 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' --1-1 -, -' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ..... --._ .i..-+ ..../ -I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' l I I I I ~ ' ''' -r,,-,-1 I I I I I ' ' ' ' I I I I :-J:.:::/ I : : : : ~{,. '~'' s. ' ' ' -t..::... I I I I I I I I I _1_ Ll_l_l I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' '< ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' -,_ 1--+-I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' hl' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,-rr11-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,~~ '' I I I I I I I ,~111111 I I I I I I I _I_ L L .1 _j _I I I I I I I I I , , }I I I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I I I''' I 'I~ j I I I I! I lj ! I 1 I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I: {II I I I I I] I I I I I I I I I \II I I I I I I 1-J-"-1-1-1-l-l -1. l-111 II II j:: (II I I 1 I 111 I I I I I I I I I 11 I j t I I I I I 14 ' ''' ''' I I I I '' ' h-~~,-;:~. ' l"'"~J ~1 I I I I I I I] I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '' ''' ''' 1" D !llll!ll:i '' '' '' '' 11 I I I I I 1-1 : . I I I I I I I I D llllllll:t: ''' ''' ''' ''' ''' r. U_UJJ~U,, l I I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I " " "ii '. ''' I I I I ______ ::-1111 ' ' ' .._ 1--1--1. -1 . ' -, ! I I I ----i-- ,- ' ~' ' I I I I -,L-~-s, ~-C I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' Depth Increment= 0.164 feet D 7 silty sand to sandy silt D 8 sand to silty sand 09 sand Pre-drilled 1 foot D 10 gravelly sand to sand D 11 very stiff fine grained (*) D 12 sand to clayey sand(*) Pressure (psi) 9 8 7 6 5 4 ,--' ' ' ' ' --1-----I ' Operator Gerdes Sounding: CPT-1 Cone Used: DPG1186 ' ' ' PanGeo -~--\!__ l I I I ---------1-----I ---I --I-- ' ' --: -: \: :-: ---------:-----:---:--: ' CPT Datemme: 10/12/201211:02:0JAM Location: American Legend Renton Job Number: 12-164 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ! I t ! I l I l I -f-I ---------,-----I ---1 --I --! -I -I - ' ' ' ' ' -I---------------- ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I ________ I _____ J ___ J __ ~ __ L_L _ ' ' ' _ I_L _________ L----~---~--________ l _____ !_~_J __ 1 __ 1 _L_II _ I I I I _ L _ _!_ _ L _1 ' ' I I I I ' ' ' ________ I _____ J_t--_ .1 __ ..J _ -L_ ~ -~ ~-~ ________ -:-__ ~ _ -~ __ ~ _ -~ -~ -~ -:-~ __ ------___ -..J ---..J _ -...J __ L -J_ _ L _I ' ' ' Selected Depth(s) (feet) -24.442 10 100 1000 nme: (seconds) t1iJ:::.. ~ 6) Pressure (psi) 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 Operator Gerdes Sounding: CPT-1 Cone Used: OPG1186 PanGeo CPT Date/Time: 1011212012 9:25:46AM Location: American Legend Renton Job Number: 12-164 ' -------~-----+---+--~--1--1--~~-1----------1-----+-----1----I--1-1 ---------1-------< ---·l--~--I-----1--I ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I ________ I _____ .1 ___ .1 __ _J __ I __ L _ I __ I_ L _________ I_ ___ ...! ___ _J __ _J __ L _ _L_I_L _________ I _____ _J ___ _J __ _J __ L_.l_L_I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --------,-----\---!--I -, I I I --/-----1-----1---,--1--, -, -, -1----------,-----,----,--,---,-,- ' ' , ' ' ' --------1------:----"t -----r-,--;--1-t----------1-------r -----r ----1--:---r -1'" -1-i"" ---------,--------, -----1---:--r -..--t--1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ________ I_----_L ___ .L __ .1 _ _/L_ l __ L _I_L ___ ---___ I _____ J ____ J ___ J __ l __ l. _L_I_ L __ ---____ 1_ -__ -.J ____ J ___ I_ -L_.l _ L-1 I I l I I I ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --------, -------I -I I I -I ---------,-----,---,---,--,--1-,-,-,---------1------,---,---,--,- ' ' --------,y-----:----; ---, --r -:--;--,-r ---------,------, ----, ---.--:----:--r -r-r ---------1------, ----, ---,--r -, -r -1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' Selected Depth(s) (feet) -60.203 15 ~---~--~-~-~~~~~----~--~-~-~~~~~----~--~-~-~~~~~ 1 10 100 1000 Time: (seconds) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ffei [L ~ iR< IE ~if (O) N Technical Information Report prepared for: Sitn.nduo MeD"ilg Stvaizza11rai date: February 15, 2013 City of Renton Planning Division FEB I 9 iUU 15)n n nlElO~DIE LANODEVELOPMENTCONSULTING IQ) Lb \l.l} IJ;;. U 0'3 IJ;;. 25 CENTRAL WAY SUITE 400 KIRKLAND WA 98033 o TEL 42!;-216-4051 FAX 42!;-216-4052 o THEBLUEUNEGROUP.COM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I City of Renton, Washington Technical Information Report Prepared for Studio Meng Strazzara 2001 Western Ave, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98121 Date: February 15, 2013 Blueline Job No. 12-160 Prepared by: Dene Kuzaro, EIT Cory Taylor, EIT Reviewed by: Rob Long, PE ro llUJ IE n n lln IE LAND DEVELOPMENT c0Nsu,T1NG IQ U..U U".J 25 CENTRAL WAY SUITE 400 KIRKLAND WA 98033 a TEL 425-216-4051 FAX 425-216-4052 D THEBUJELINEGROUP.COM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I American Legend Cooperative Technical Information Report Table of Contents SECTION 1 SECTION 2 SECTION 3 SECTION 4 SECTION 5 SECTION 6 SECTION 7 SECTION 8 Appendix PROJECT OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................... 1-1 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY ................................................................ 2-1 OFFSITE ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................ 3-1 FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS ............................................................ 4-1 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ............................................................... 5-1 OTHER PERMITS ............................................................................................................... 6-1 TESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ........................................................................................... 7-1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE .................................................................................... 8-1 o Web Soil Survey o Existing Conditions Exhibit o Developed Conditions Exhibit Job# 12-160 ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I Section 1 American Legend Cooperative Technical Information Report Project Overview The site is located at 200 SW 34th Street & 200 SW 29th Street, in Renton, Washington. More generally, the site is located in Section 30, Township 23 North, and Range 5 East, W.M. Please see the vicinity map below. N M K £ BLVD AX SW 19THST SW 21ST ST S 23RD ST SW 27TH ST ~/Ju~ V) " "' "' " V) ~ SW J4TH ST <( ~ ~ SW 41ST ST Vicinity Map Not to Scale ~ " '" ~ ~ ~ '" The site consists of one parcel, #1253800040, totaling approximately 6.90 acres, but the development area consists of only 0.2 acres. In the existing condition, site coverage includes a warehouse, asphalt parking lot and landscaping. The applicant is proposing to add an addition onto the warehouse, replacing a portion of the currently impervious parking area, with building area. Job# 12-160 Page 1-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I American Legend Cooperative Technical Information Report Per the web soils survey included in the appendix, underlying soils consists primarily of Snohomish silt loam (So) with a small portion of the SW corner consisting of Tukwila muck (Tu); both till soils, hydrologic soil group D. Construction will include removal of a portion of asphalt parking area, and replacing that area with an addition onto the existing warehouse along with associated infrastructure. The site consists of two drainage basins. Runoff from the north portion of the site enters the tight-lined system in the south side of SW 29'" Street, eventually discharging to the Black River. Runoff from the south portion of the site enters the tight-lined system in the north side of SW 34'" Street, eventually discharging to the Black River. Only the South basin is being modified as part of the redevelopment. Job# 12-160 Page 1·2 I I Section 2 American Legend Cooperative Technical Information Report Conditions and Requirements Summary I Core Requirement #1: Discharge at the Natural Location Runoff from the proposed developed site will continue to discharge at its natural discharge location(s). I Please refer to the Downstream Analysis in Section 3 for complete description of the existing drainage conditions of the site. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Core Requirement #2: Off-6ite Analysis See Section 3 of this Report for the Downstream Analysis. Core Requirement #3: Flow Control The developed site 100-year peak flow runoff will not increase more than 0.1 cfs from the existing conditions, and is therefore exempt from flow control per Exception 2.a Section 1.2.3.1.A of the 2009 KCSWDM. Please see Section 4 of this report. Core Requirement #4: Conveyance System The existing conveyance system and areas drainage to it will be maintained throughout the development. Therefore, a conveyance analysis is not required. See Section 5 of this Report. Core Requirement #5: Erosion and Sediment Control See Section 7 of this Report for Erosion and Sediment Control measures. Core Requirement #6: Operations and Maintenance An Operations and Maintenance Manual for the private drainage system is included in Section 8 of this Report. Core Requirement #7: Financial Guarantees and Llablllty This Core Requirement will be addressed prior to permit issuance. Core Requirement #8: Water Quality The developed site will not create additional pollution generating impervious surface area (PGIS), and additionally the PGIS area onsite will be reduced and converted to roof area (NPGIS). Therefore, the site is exempt from water quality requirements per Exemption 1.b of Section 1.2.8 of the 2009 KCSWDM. Please see Section 4 of this Report. Job# 12-160 Page 2·1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I American Legend Cooperative Technical Information Report Section 3 Offsite Analysis RESOURCE REVIEW The best available resource information was reviewed for existing or potential problems downstream of the site to the discharge locations at the Black River. The following is a summary of the findings based on a combination of the City of Renton Sensitive Areas Maps and NWMaps. o The site is located within the Green River-Lake Washington Watershed. o The site is not located within a FEMA Flood Hazard zone. o The site is not located in an Erosion Hazard or Landslide Hazard Area; the site does not contain steep slopes. o The site is not located within a Coal Mine Hazard area. o The site is not located within an Aquifer Protection zone. o Per NWMaps, the site lies within a liquefaction area. The site consists of two drainage basins. Runoff from the north portion of the site enters the tight-lined system in the south side of SW 29th Street. From here flows continue west to the conveyance system on the westside of Lind Ave SW, then continue north to SW 27th St. Flows continue though the conveyance system in SW 27th Street and discharge to the Black River. Runoff from the south portion of the site enters the tight-lined system in the north side of SW 34th Street and continues west, discharging to the Black River. Job# 12-160 Page 3-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Section 4 American Legend Cooperative Technical Information Report Flow Control and Water Quality Analysis The proposed development will be replacing approximately 0.20 acres of existing pollution generating impervious surfaces with an equal amount of roof area (NPGIS). Developed runoff flow rates will not differ from existing flows. Therefore, flow control is not required per Exception 2.a Section 1.2.3.1.A of the 2009 KCSWDM, as adopted by the City of Renton. Please see the Existing Conditions and Developed Conditions Exhibits included in the Appendix. The proposed development will be replacing approximately 0.20 acres of existing pollution generating impervious surfaces with an equal amount of roof area (NPGIS). There will be no increase in PGIS and additionally the PGIS area will be reduced. Therefore, water quality treatment is not required per Exemption 1.b of Section 1.2.8 of the 2009 KCSWDM, as adopted by the City of Renton. Please see the Existing Conditions and Developed Conditions Exhibits included in the Appendix. Job# 12-160 Page 4-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Section 5 American Legend Cooperative Technical Information Report Conveyance System Analysis and Design Roof drains will be connected to the existing conveyance system. As previously discussed, runoff from the developed site will not differ from the existing conditions and the existing conveyance system will be maintained throughout the development. Therefore the conveyance system capacity will remain the same as the existing condition and an analysis is not required. Job# 12-160 Page 5-1 I I Section 6 Other Permits American Legend Cooperative Technical Information Report I No other permits related to the storm drainage design are known to be required at this time. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Job# 12-160 Page 6-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I American Legend Cooperative Technical Information Report Section 7 TESC Analysis and Design Design of the ESC plan was completed in conformance with Section 1.2.5 and Section 2.3.1.3 of the 2009 KCSWDM. The temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan is comprised of temporary measures {inlet protection) as well as permanent measures. The following BMPs will be applied to prevent erosion and trap sediments within the project site and are shown on sheet TP-01: o Clearing Limits -Prior to any site clearing or grading, the clearing limits as noted on sheet TP-01 are to be marked in the field. o Cover Measures -Temporary and permanent cover measures shall be provided to protect all disturbed areas. Temporary cover shall be installed if an area is to remain unworked for more than seven days during the dry season {May 1 to September 30) or for more than two consecutive working days during the wet season {October 1 to April 30). These time limits may be relaxed if an area poses a low risk of erosion due to soil type, slope gradient, anticipated weather conditions, or other factors. Cover measures include the use of surface roughening, mulch, erosion control nets and blankets, plastic covering, seeding, and sodding. 0 Perimeter Protections -Perimeter protection to filter sediment from sheet flow shall be located downslope of disturbed areas and shall be installed prior to upslope grading. The location of the proposed CB-inserts is show on sheet TP-01. o Sediment Retention -The site generally slopes from North to South, therefore CB-inserts will be installed along immediate downstream path of the site to retain all sediment on site. o Oewaterlng Control -Runoff generated by dewatering {if needed) shall be treated by releasing the water to a well vegetated, gently sloping area. • Oust Control -Preventative measures to minimize the wind transport of soil shall be taken when a traffic hazard may be create or when sediment transported by wind is likely to be deposited in water resources or adjacent properties. When necessary, water should be used to control dust. Water should be sprayed on exposed soils until wet, but runoff shall not be generated by spraying. Oil should not be used for dust control. Job# 12-160 Page 7-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I American Legend Cooperative Technical Information Report Section 8 Operations and Maintenance Operations and maintenance tables from the 2009 KCSWDM Appendix A for private systems are included in the following pages. Job# 12-160 Page 8-1 I I APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES I NO. 5-CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES Maintenance Defect or Problem Condition When Maintenance ts Neodod Reaulta Expected When I Component Maintenance la Performed Structure Sediment Sediment exceeds 80% of the depth from the Sump of catch basin contains no bottom of the catch basin to the Invert of the sediment. lowest pipe Into or out of the catch basin or is within 6 inches of the Invert of the lowest pipe I Into or out of the catch basin. Trash and debris Trash or debris of more than 1h cubic foot which No Trash or debris blocking or Is located Immediately ln front of the catch basin potentially blocklng entrance to opening or ls block.Ing capacity of the catch basin catch basin. I by more than 10°.4. Trash or debris In the calch basin that exoeeds No trash or debris In the catch basin. 1/3 the depth from the bottom of basin to invert the lowest Pipe Into or out of the basin. I Dead animals or vegetation that could generate No dead anlll'!als or vegetation odors that could cause complaints or dangerous present within catch basin. gases (e.g., methane). Deposits of garbage exceeding 1 cubic foot In No condition present which would I volume. attract or support the breeding of insects or rodents. Damage to frame Comer of frame extends more than '..'4 Inch past Freme la even with curb. and/or top slab curb face into the street (If applicable). I Top slab has holes larger than 2 square inches or Top slab is free of holes and cracks. aacks wider than Y. Inch. Frame not silting flush on top slab, I.e., Frame Is sittlng flush on top slab. I separation of more than % inch of lhe frame from the lop slab. Cracks in walls or Cracks wider than X Inch and longer than 3 feet, Catch basin is sealed and bottom any evidence of soil particles entering catch structurally sound. basin through cracks, or maintenance person I Judges that catch basin Is unsound. Cracks wider than Ya Inch and tonger than 1 foot No cracks more than 1 /4 inch wide at at the joint of any Inlet/outlet pipe or any evidence the joint of inletlouUet pipe. of soil particles entering catch basin through I cracks. Settlement/ Catch basin has settled more than 1 inch or has Basin replaced or repaired to design mlsalfgnment rotated more than 2 inches out of alignment standards. I Damaged pipe joints Creeks wider than %-Inch at the Joint of the No cracks more than X-lnch wide at Inlet/outlet pipes or any evidence of soil entering the Joint of Inlet/outlet pipes. the catch basin at tho Joint of the tnlot/outlet pipes. I Contaminants and Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such Materials removed and disposed of pollution as on, gasoline, conaete slurries or paint. according to applicable regulatlons. Source control BMPs Implemented if appropriate. No contaminants present other than a surface oil film. I Inlet/Outlet Pipe Sediment Sediment filling 20% or more of the pipe. Inlet/outlet pipes clear of sediment. accumulation Trash and debris Trash and debris accumulated in inlet/outrel No trash or debris Jn pipes. pipes Qncludes floatables and non-floatables). I Damaged Cracks wider than *-Inch at the Joint of the No crackS more than X-inch wide at Inlet/outlet pipes or any evidence of soll entering the joint of the Inlet/outlet pipe. at the joints of the inlet/outlet pipes. I I 2009 Surface Water Design Manual -Appendix A 1/9/2009 A-9 I I I APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES I NO. 5-CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES Malntonance Dofoct or Problom Condition When Maintenance Is Needed Results Expected When I Component Maintenance Is Porformed Metal Grates Unsafe grate opening Grate with opening wider than 1/8 inch. Grate opening meets design (Catch Basins) standards. Trash and debris Trash and debris that Is blocking more than 20% Grate tree of trash and debris. I of grate surface. footnote to guidellnes for disposal Damaged or missing Grate missing or broken member(s) of the grate. Grate Is In place and meets design Any open structure requires urgent standards. maintenance. I Manhole Cover/Lid Cover/lid not in place Cover/lid ls missing or only partially in place. Cover/lid protects opening to Any open stru,tura requires urgent structure. maintenance. I Locking mechanism Mechanism cannot be opened by one Mechanism opens with proper tools. Not Working maintenance person with proper tools. Bolts cannot be seated. Self-locking cover/lid does not work. Cover/lid difficult to One maintenance person cannot remove Cover/lld can be removed and I Remove cover/lid afler applying 80 lbs. of lift. reinstalled by one maintenance person. I I I I I I I I I I 1/9/2009 2009 Surface Water Design MH11ual -Appendix. A A-IO I I I APPEND!X A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES I NO. 6 -CONVEYANCE PIPES AND DITCHES Malnten~nce Defect or Problem Conditions When Maintenance Is Needed Results Expected When I Component Maintenance Is Performed Pipes Sediment & debris Accumulated sediment or debris that exceeds Water flows freely through pipes. accumutatlon 20% of the diameter or the pipe. VegetaUon/roots Vegetation/roots that reduce free movement of Water flows freely through pipes. I water through pipes. Contaminants and Any evidence of contaminants or poltutlon such Materials removed and disposed of pollution as oll, gasoline, concrete slunies or paint. according to applicable regulations. Source control BMPs Implemented If I epproprtate. No contaminants present other than a surface oil film. Damage to protective Protective coating Is damaged; rust or corrosion Pipe repaired or replaced. coating or corrosion Is weakening the structural fntegrtty of any par1 of pipe. I Damaged Any dent that decreases the cross section area of Pipe repaired or replaced. pipe by more than 20% or Is determined lo have weakened structural integrity of the pipe. I Ditches Trash and debris Trash and debris exceeds 1 cubic foot per 1,000 Trash and debris deared from square feet of dildl and slopes. ditches. Sediment Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% of the Ditch cleaned/flushed of all sediment accumutaffon design depth. and debris so that It matches design. I Noxious weeds Any noxious or nuisance vegetation which may Noxious and nuisance vegetation constitute a hazard to County personnel or the removed according to applicable public, regulations. No danger of noxious vegetation where County personnel or the public might normally be. I Contaminants and Any evidence of contaminanls or pollution such Materials removed and disposed of pollution as oil, gasoline, concrete slurries or pa!nl. according to applicable regulallons. Source control BMPs implemented if appropriate. No contaminants I present other than a surface oil film. Vegetation Vegetation that reduces free movement of water Water flows freely through ditches. through ditches. I Erosion damage to Any erosion Observed on a ditch slope. Slopes are not eroding. slopes Rock lining out of One layer or less of rock exists above native soll Replace rocks to design slandards. place or missing (If area 5 square feet or more, any exposed native Applicable) soil. I I I I I I 2009 Surface Water Design Manua1 -Appendix A 1/912009 A-11 I I I APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND IVQ FACIUTIES I NO. 7 -DEBRIS BARRIERS (E.G., TRASH RACKS) Maintenance Defect or Problem Condition When Maintenance ls Needed Results Expected When I Component Maintenance Is Perlormed. SIie Trash and debris Trash or debris plugging more than 20% of the Barrier dear to receive capacity flow. area of the barrier. Sediment Sediment accumulation of greater than 20% of Barrier clear to receive capacity flow. I accumulation the area of the barrier Structure Cracked broken or Structure which bars attached to Is damaged ~ Structure barrier attached to ls loose pipe Is loose or cracked or concrete structure Is sound. cracked, broken of loose. I Bars Bar spacing Bar spacing exceeds 6 Inches. Bars have at most 6 lnche spacing. Damaged or missing Bars are bent out of shape more than 3 Inches. Bars In pla.ce with no bends more bars than% Inch. I Bars are missing or entire banier missing. Bars fn place according to desJgn. Bars are loose and rust is causing 50% Repair or replace barrier to design deterioration to any part of barrier. standards. I I I I I I I I I I I 1/912009 2009 Surface Water Design Manual -Appendix A A·12 I I I APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES I NO. 9-FENCING Maintenance Defect or Problem Conditions When Maintenance Is Needed Results Expected Whon I Component Marntenance is Performed Sile Erosion or holes Erosion or holes more than 4 Inches high and 12-No access under the fence. under fence 1 a inches wide permitting access through an opening under a fence. I Wood Posts, Boards Missing or damaged Missing or broken boards, post out of plumb by No gaps on fence due to missing or and Cross Members parts more than 6 Inches or cross members broken broken boards, post plumb to within 1% inches, aoss member& &ound. I Weakened by rotting Arri/ pert showtng structural deterioration due to All parts of fence are structurally or Insects rotting or Insect damage sound. Damaged or failed Concrete or metal attachments deteriorated or Post foundation capable of post foundation unable to support poa1a. supporting posts even In strong wind. I Metal Posts, Ralls Damaged parts Pos1 out of plumb more than 6 Inches. Post plumb to within 1Ya lnches. and Fabric Top rails bent more than 6 inches. Top r~U free of bends greater than 1 inch. I Any part of fence (Jnctudlng post, top rails, and Fence Is allgned and meets design fabric) more than 1 foot out of design alignment. standards. Missing or loose tension wire. Tension wire in place and holding fabric. I Deteriorated paint or Part or parts that have a rusting or scaling Structurally adequate posts or parts protective coating condition that has affected structural adequacy. witll a uniform protective coating. Openings in fabric Openings in fabric are such that en 8-lnch Fabric mesh openings within 50% of diameter ball could flt through. grid size. I I I I I I I I I 1/9/2009 2009 Surface Water Design Manual -Appendix A A-14 I I I APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES I NO. 10 -GA TES/BOLLARDS/ACCESS BARRIERS Maintenance Defect or Problem Conditions When Maintenance Is Noedad Results Expected When I Component Maintenance Is Perfonnad Chain Link Fencing Damaged or missing Missing gate. Gates In place. Gate members Broken or missing hinges such that gate cannot Hinges Intact and lubed. Gate Is be easily opened and dosed by a maintenance working freely. I person. Gate Is out of plumb more than·S inches and Gate Is aUgned and vertical. more than 1 foot out of design alignment. I Missing stretcher bar, stretcher bands, and ties. Stretcher bar, bands, and ties in place. Lock.Ing mechanism Locking device missing, no-funcUonlng or does Locking mechanism prevents does not lock gate not link lo all parts. opening of gate. I Openings in fabric Openings 1n fabric are such that an 8-lnch Fabric mesh openings within 50% of diameter ball could fit through. grid size. Bar Gale Damaged or missing Cross bar does not swing open or closed, ls Cross bar swings fully open end cross bar missing or is bent to where it does not prevent closed and prevents vehide access. I vehlde access. Locking mechanism Locking device missing, no-functioning or does Locking mechanism prevents does not lock gate not link to all parts. opening of gate. I Support post Support post does not hold cross bar up. Cross bar held up preventing vehlde damaged access into facility. Bollards Damaged or missing Bollard broken, missing, does not flt Into support No access for motorized vehicles lo hole or hinge broken or missing. get into facility. I Does not lock Locking assembly or !ock missing or cannot be No access for motorized vehides lo attached to lock bollard In place. get into facility. Boulders Dlslodged Boulders not located to prevent motorized vehicle No access for motorized vehicles to acceas. get Into facility. I Circumvented Motorized vehicles going around or between No access for molorized vehfcles lo boulders. get lnlo facility. I I I I I I I 2009 Surface Water Design Manual -Appendix A I/9/2009 A-IS I I I APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACrLITIES I N0.11-GROUNDS (LANDSCAPING) Mainten8nce Defect or Problem Conditions When Maintenance fs Ne&ded Results Expected When I Component Maintenance Is Performed Site Trash or litter Any trash and debris which exceed 1 cubic foot Trash and debris cleared from site. per 1,000 square feet (this Is about equal to the amount of trash ii would take to fill up one I standard size office garbage can). In general, there should be no visual evidence of dumping. Noxious weeds Any noxious or nuisance vegetation which may Noxious and nuisance vegetation constitute a hazard to County personnel or the removed according to app11cable public. regulations. No danger of noxious I vegetation where County personnel or the publlc might normally be. Contaminants and Any evidence of contaminants or po!lullon such Materials removed and disposed of I poUutlon as oil, gaso!lne, concrete slurries or paint. according to applicable regulations. Source control BMPs implemented if appropriate. No contaminants present other than a surface oil film. I G<ass/groundcover Grass or groundcover exceeds 18 inches in Grass or groundcover mowed to a height. height no greater than 6 Inches. Trees and Shrubs Hazard Any tree or llmb of a tree Identified as having a No hazard trees In facility. potential to fall and causo property damage or threaten human llfe. A hazard tree Identified by I a quallfled arborist must be removed as soon as possible. Damaged Limbs or parts of trees or shrubs that are split or Trees and shrubs with less than 5% broken which affect more than 25% of the total of total foliage with split or broken foliage of the tree or shrub. limbs. I Trees or shrubs that have been blown down or No blown down vegetation or knocked over. knocked over vegetation. Trees or shrubs free of injury. I Trees or shrubs which are nol adequately Tree or shrub In place end supported or ere leanlng over, causing exposure adequately supported: dead or of the roots. diseased trees removed. I I I I I I 119/2009 2009 Surface Water Design Manual -Appendix A A-16 I I I APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FLOW CONffiOL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES I NO. 12 -ACCESS ROADS I Maintenance Defect or Problem Condition When Maintenance Is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance la Performed Site Trash and debris Trash and debris exceeds 1 cubic foot per 1,000 Roadway drivable by maintenance square feel (Le., trash and debris would fill up vehldes. one standards size garbage can). I I Debris which could damage vehicle tJres or Roadway drlvable by maintenance prohibit use of road. vehldes. Contaminants and Any evidence of contaminants or potJutlon such Materials removed and disposed of pollution as oll, gasollne, concrete slurries or paint. according to applicable regulations. Source conlrol BMPs implemented if appropriate. No contaminants present other lhan a surface oll film. I Blocked roadway Any obstruction which reduces clearance above Roadway overhead clear to 14 feet road surface to less than 14 feet. high. Any obstruction restricting the access to a 1 ~ to AJ least 12•foot of width on access 12 foot width for a distance of more than 12 feet road. or any point restricting access to less than a 10 foot width. I Road Surface Erosion, settlement, Any surface defect which hin~ers or prevents Road drivable by maintenance potholes, soft spots, maintenance access. vehicles. ruts I Vegetation on road Trees or other vegetation prevent access to Maintenance vehlcles can access surface faclllty by maintenance vehicles. facill1y. Shoulders and Erosion Erosion within 1 foot of the roadway more than 8 Shoulder free of erosion and Ditches lncheS wide and 6 Inches deep. matching the surrounding road. I Weeds and brush Weeds and brush exceed 1 B Inches ln height or Weeds and brush cut to 2 inches In hinder maintenance access. height or cleared In such a way as to allow maintenance access. I Modular Grid Contaminants and Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such Materials removed and disposed of Pavement pollution as oil, gasoline, concrete slurries or paint. according to appUcab1e regulations. Souroe control BMPs implemented if appropriate. No contaminants presenl other than a surface oil film. I Damaged or missing Access surface compacted because of broken on Access road surface restored so missing modular block. road infiltrates. I I I I I I 2009 Surface Water Design Manual -Appendix A l/9(2009 A-17 I I I APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES I NO. 24 -CATCH BASIN INSERT I Maintenance Defect or Problem Conditions When Maintenance Is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance Is Performed Media Insert Visible 011 Vlslble oil sheen passing through media Media Inset replaced. I Insert does not fit Flow gets Into catch basin without going through All flow goes through media. catch basin proper1y media. FIiter media plugged FIiier media plugged. Flow through filter media Is normal. OU absorbent media Media all saturated, 011 absorbent media replaced. I salurated Water saturated Catch basin insert is saturated with water, which Insert replaced. no longer has the capacity to absorb. I Service life exceeded Regular interval replacement due to typical Media replaced et manufacturer's average life of media Insert product. typically one recommended Interval. month. Seasonal When storms occur and durlna the wet season. Remove, clean and replace or install maintenance new Insert after major storms, I monthly during the wet season or at manufacturer's recommended Interval. I I I I I I I I I I 2009 Surface Water Design Manual -Appendix A 1/9/2009 A-35 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 47' 2113" 47' 26' 56" 558600 : --~ --~' 558600 ~ ~ ~ N A Soil Map-King County Area, Washington 558660 558720 558780 558660 558 20 80 Map Scala: 1:2,610 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet. ==cc:==========~IMeters 558840 558640 0 25 50 100 150 ================IFeet 0 100 200 400 600 USDA Natural Resources !?:5 Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 558900 558900 558960 558960 2/12/2013 Page 1 of3 4r 2113· 47" 26' 55" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Soil Map-King County ArBB, Washington MAP LEGEND Arn of lnt.r.st IAOI) [J Atu of Interest (AOI) Solis i.J Soll Map Unlt1 Speclal Point F•aturea ~ -"' 1!11 BOfTOW PII "' Clay Spot • Closed Depreulon X Gravel Pit ,. Gravelly Spot " "'"""' A Lava Fla,,i ... Marsh or swamp ~ MV!a or Quarry .. Mi5cehneous Wll!ar @ Perennial Water V Rock ou1erop + Saline Spot .. Sandy Spot -severely Eroded spot • "'"'"' l• Slide or Slip • Sodle spo1 .. SpoUArea 0 stony Spot Natural Rasourc11 Con.arvauon Service a) Very stciny Spot ' w.t Spot • Other Special Un, Featuras t.V G,ly ~ Short Steep Slope ~ Other Pollllcal FNturu 0 CIIH Wat•r FHIUl"H ~ Streams ind Canals Tr:anaportatlon Et -~ ~ ~ "'" lrrter.tate Highway, US Routn Major Roads Local Road• Web Soll Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey MAP INFORMATION Map Scale: 1:2,610 if printed on A size (B.5" 11 11~) sheet The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1;24,000. Werning: Solt Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement The maps do not show the smaQ areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scats on each mep sheet for accurate map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Se!Vice Web Soil Survey URL: http:/fWebsoilsurvey .nrcs.usda, gov Coordinate System: UTM Zone 10N NAD83 This producl Is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data es of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: King County Area, Washington Survey Area Data: Version 7, Jul 2, 2012 Data(s) aerial images were photographed: 7124/2006 The orthophoto or other base map on Which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background Imagery displayed on these maps. Ase result, some minor shifting of map unll boundaries may be evident. 2/12/2013 Page2ot3 I I I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I Soil Map-King County Area, Washington ii/lap Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol So Tu Totals for Area of Interest Natural Resources Conservation Service King County·Area, Washington (_WA633) Map Unit Name Acres In AOI Snohomish silt loam Tukwila muck Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey Percent of AOI 11.3 0.1 11.4 99.4% 0.6% 100.0°!. 2/12/2013 Page 3 of 3 -------------------Ft:b 1S, 201J -8: 44om -User ctayfor £: \Projects\ 12160 \Dwg \Exhibits\ 12-160 EC DC Exhibit dwg :1· WrTtR(R) I . . : • ~ I.· .. · ... · .· ...... J .· . . 3 .. · . 111-, 1~1~1~~- : 1, . · .· .. J· · 1:: 11 I I~ I I .. (/) I . . . . . I II I~ _I~~ 11~ {/)I.. .·:11 I /~~'1 I::~· .. · ... ·11[,I 1!0; 1121 . . 1 · . . · II I / ~ \I~ .... · .. · .··.·.~.·· .•.. · .. ·.. \\\ \ \ / .. '~ "II// !:\ 11 1~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 ~/ N I I .. · ... ~~ .~ . ~SD . u l "= . I .·.·············[J.. ---. --. ---:-. ---:-. k.': /(\ ~ 1·· . 1. . . ~1i'-.."- I. 1 · . l·· · .. ·· ·.··. ~ I~ I I~ . 1· . . . J~ . . r . I . . . . . :E . I . . . II~ . l/) . p . I . . . . . I . . . . . , . . s·:w R) . . . . l g . 11 \k .· .· .................... ~lit~_ . . . l/) ;,_ .. -._: -_: _ . ..:. ·-' _:.--'-_:_i~ .. I·.·.°•,--------- "' ·/1 1 . ~ I I 7j 11;1 • "'--s. ~ . I . i . . . · 1 JI I)'-I"."' I . . . . . ( . . . . ii I '--'--.~ . · 1 ·.. \. 1111 '--~ . :E 1 .... i. ~/ 1111 So~ I . .· . ·-.· . gJI I &i~ r 1.·.· · 11 1 · ~ I ·.·.·11: t\ .·.1·. I. . . /11· . ~~ .:El .. 1:1 ~ (5 i,:;S;;;.;CA=LE ___ __.....AS .... NO=m>-------t iij a, PRDJEC T MANA GER ROB LONG, P£ .). ~ DESIGNED BY CORY TAlt DT /EXISTING CDNDITIDNS AM/ER/CAN L/EG£ND CD-DP ;\1·; -~~DRAWN BY ,9 PLOT DATE z m CJ 201 J THE BLUELJNE GROUP -------------------Feb 15, 201J -8: 46am -Usor ctoyfor £: \Proflcts\12160\Dwg\Exhlblts\12-160 EC DC Exhlblt.dwg ~ ~ ~ ; ~ 9 (/) ~ ~I --;g j ; ~ l:tJ ~ ~ "'( i l'l'j l:J :!:] ~ SCALE t'J "' ~: PROJECT MANAGER I ~ -i OESJGNED BY 0 !'.' 8 1ll DRAWN BY -~ PLOT DATE I . . . I I c.n . I . 0. I 1 ·1 Q I 1 I l \ 1. t 1.· I I :;; I . 1 .. I I I j \ . I ·1 ::;; . I T!R( ~ I -~ I ~ I ~ I~ . I ' . I .. I N ·I :;; ' I I '2 I I · .. ~ ,. I. 11~ ., I .. I "1l I , 11~-. ,· ;.< ~ I . 11 ... . I, ., . ~ I ,. · I I ~ I. · 1 . '·· ·I I ~ I . I :.!:: I :,!: (/) i! ~ I . 0 I ;! I l:} "' ' . I ., I f / I I /. I :;; I I I I /. ·1.: . ·s"WR I /1 .• · . ·I· · 1 I .·. · .· · f . 'l 11 J . . L--:"'-i .:;,_-lllor\----'-~--------'~ 1111· ... l .··.·•·· .. ·/ Ulil . . ~ < . . ·I\:). U1 . . t-._"' II·. I · 1 _·_.· ... ··.~. g 1111 '--, . -~~ 1111·· 1 .·1.· ' . . . . I .... ·J 111 So'-. . ~" ::.· .. ···11 .. _· . \··_.· .. ;(::. . '-.'-.'-. t'\ ·1 . . . : . > 1·1 . So~ 11 . ,. ·. · '· ·>'. I ,::;-;, "' 111.· 1 .. · .... · < . \3 111 5;~~ !! } · .. ·_.·. \:! ~ .; ... 0 • ASN01ED ROBL P£ CORY TA '11.0/t DT CORY TA '11.0/t EJT F, 1 201:S DEVELOPED CDNDITIDNS l!!v)·. AMERICAN LEGEND C::D•DP ffi r .. z m /C)207J THE BLUEL/NE GROUP