Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Report 1
~ 0 \ n • -' - ttl I .! I <> & 7i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I " , . rll!,tJ~ ~-~~;,;;;:,._. or i'tAlir 8~/"".ir 3"0- 411~'J~S~ /'t:/ /?\;}'" '<'~I-.~,,<f.pP '2.:# ;,;:, "j\' Q ~'t' ',"-/'~ ~ #-~' • ',OOPfj~ (If ~~~CISSlJS WITHIH .ru S~~, -,.. /' ",,".j -~U;>IIIGS ()F 7, i. O~ , I ~UUlS, TIP .~, ~ "-,,7\ 8l!t~5 101>(. Tnl, A'I!:A ''',-LA"'~ '-," ~Hlll l'.~' 'OH CONJUHUAltON t!f H1G1l0SHDtNC (lSI OF TH:S UU Macleod. Reckord PI_LC ."-""""'''''' ... ''' _w_ .. .,. M-l<.",. """""" IlllOSilO,,- .~ URS I?"ru" 'Q""" "O'4TH'~~,!;.oT!I.1l<I ~~~'('~~)~~11~ 11-------1 '"' (16<)<.1.-.... :,;>--C;:~W/l.1Ili: 0' HASI II .... -~"'-~- . """---. -~--- "'-uw~ / HlllI!OSW;"""", "VG".oI-,~Q.:--"'__. "" . " " V>';IifJ{j, __ ' ~s S~.~~_3;_~);~;q~_, __ _ p~-p.~ l~Wj--rl,.,;.rl:;o-oiiU;l~~~-' l~ sll!)'f1l.-¥"'· ~'1ia'll'l ,/ ./ G!!oUf'l~C~-'O,,,Nj,~CjS~' .... \y1TI~N .\' OF [vcvar,p'.AA1 IjfO ~~o"~oc'm:~, W (;IWlIf'1l,CS"Of'7, II: O~ 'VtlUlBS 4IlD IIIJlHS/lOf}l lias }Rt). ~CC'J$ eJ1.~' I~ :..o~ l~m ,lJ.E~S. IftCRUS[ OE~S!1"f W!I~ --<, 6 0, ~ (BO:~ ';!nl> or Cr~TqIWIl)_ O[C~[A;[ SPACING W ;>.ila~ raWAi!O OUTER LlMrT", ct l),IIIH ~~[A. ;:: ::~ ~~;~ ~ ~::~~i~ :~ PERII.K1ER ROAD __ ~~!tS~T~_______ --~- ", " Y/;. "(.. ':, ~~ ~ " ~ ) ~I __ ----~.aT~: SH(fr l1.'JPt"T ~Ilf'_ gc,NllIIU.II"IL ____ ~~" 2 >1:[ SHu:! l: 0' 'GIl l'II[l<~OIUIHAGE '>;[j PlO-NT BW lMOU! Sf( SHEET L2.0; 'C~ ~~T;t,C NC';:S .~D PUNT S2HWlJcE. 5([ Iq~!~ATIDK SH[[:S lJ.OI-LJ Q}. :".' ,,;,;.;,,( ,:;:::r,~,,;~, ,F' -~l\\';~ ',11 ,;,0/"'" ;0 lO ~,:, --"!-;iCAIJ'Jti.fJ,:E.I RUNWAY BLAST WALL REPLAC::MENT RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CLAYTON SCOTT FIELD RENTON, WASHINGTON l1.02 "",i.. ~ "! "'1. t ~, c " o o ,. Cl~I<JIIJIjI 01 DlJ.,1 WAU P[R1METD-1 ROAD -------- Macleod i. Reckord PlLC """"."'o.-S_»; ;:;;~'i.':-i1'" ''-'11 ..... ' URS W/T'j.,."' ....... ",11 'T~ ''<lH''', ,un[ '000 I , ... ~'" -4 m.T1:r.,,~,,'"' "'0>Il'(m!1''''''«I , rv.'(llX!l~·!I~ --1 --------------------- "'"'~--." t:'~ff'-:~~ "'-....LJ."H!HY{lI!()S[m~ ',,-LJ."H ! H1'OROSHG -" N.OKS: "R~UF'IHG, Dr 'lAAC,~~U, lI'ilHIH -"tEA SHWN GROUPIH~S 0, 7.~, OR II ~UI~\. np ,~U ~Ul~' fOTAl 1"', /Jl~ m: 5HEn-L: Q1 ro; PU"~Hl: 'P(m'rlIIfTNIJ~lIQH 1 S!'E ,rEEf u 01 ro~ 1JI,tI['D~u.;Ior;[ ~~ "IA1B HfD (~YOUL ---- ---- ----- ---__ .l-.. SlI s.~m ~Q~ ~~HO::S ~~o PLlJjT 9::'I[C'll[[ j, SEl '~~IGAlI~~ SlIEI5 ll.O'-n.Ol lIRIa'l ~U~tl.hl \J~l\[I' I,l[; -~''', " ~'---..... H)j W~!lNG GiiAflf ;" C;'ilL CP .. WIW; Pl.O~$ " ~= ~." SCALF. IN FEET '" ----- " WALL REPLACEMENT RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CLAYTON SCOTT FIELD RENTON, WASHINGTON L 1,03 II ~------------------- ~: , , o c , , o I , ; I i . , j , .~ ! I , ! , l 8 I , , -~ -i., i , I , I l , ! l , , :;t-, , , , Ii ~- ,-I I 0 I , I; I' 'j ~ i:.': ,- : I", 11 I '['11 , . . I I I I , I ! ! ! ! I i • ! • ! ! ~E ~~ ~a I I I I I :1 ;;) ! ~ ; ! • ~'~' i :: .: 75.t , : " i i '. .! ~ ~ -+---: 'I ,I : !/' ; \ __ .' " r'" : : i . I t ~ .,-'-- • I i i. j, I , " : \ I'" I i \ I t'" -, ..... , , .. " - y' ~ "" '. J:.:,.:::c' '-<'.> j • , • i !~ I ,I ;1 I ;1 ,I , I " '~ I' , ' td l , , , , , , , , . ' :J f r , I' , I \I o __ -R5Io-'---__ I'ISI>----~ I' , . l' . """'!L--~~----. """7 '. . ::::;::>- -, @§)--~'.-@-- , :::=:- --:-_RSoO----------- , ! I, o ~~\\ _ (ft.-_ -\\_In-\ ----=-- \ , ,':::,~ x"_--, --~ \; \ , , , ---- ~ J , ---__ ~ ___ ·1I' ~ l i 'bia _~_r::~ G " ~ f ~ I t I 1 I I 1 ~ I 1 \ 1 i , \ 1 \ 1 \ I \ I -", 1 , , ~ s i -1--\ .-it-:_=::-----::_ ---~ -=-=.:'L i ., URS o;ErmJOTWUOE 1!IIl, ,,~ .""'"'. 5"'" ,_ su;rru:.'01;' t11101 _. IZ~) -"Jl00 r"'(lOO).<l8-IHI 1>jQIIW )PPOI?T 'HAY • DESlGHED: • -~ CItE",!!> • ~ .. o DUQI.""" t- . -,~ ~'-~ I,iPPORl W~,~ -I ~I -~ o <0 ... ;#'¢'b RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CLAYTON SCOTT FIELD RENTON, WASHINGTON I , 1;~ ", Q I \ EO I k~ 1~t 'I"lt /y '/ i r l / }, /! / II ~rmu:' / / 1 1 I S I \ , , )L_~ i I 1 o ~ " RUNWAY BLAST WALL REPLACEMENT SITE PLAN ~. ~,-.~ ffiO '" 40 11_0 SCAI...E IN HET HORlZONTM. SOlE COlI ".'l[~' .... , 00., Notes Bla st Wall & 820 Building Demoli ti on Projects. o Neighborhood Detail Map Legend City and County Labels City and County Boundary [J Othet r~ City 0/ Renton 1.031 o 516 1,031 Feel City of Renton ® Fin an ce & IT Division B.O.hle 8 . Dahle 1/3 1120 14 This map is a user generated Sialic output from an Internet mapping site and IS for reference only Data layers that appear on thiS map mayor may nOI be accurate, current , orOlherwlse reliable THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION ~----------------------------------------------------------~I f" &1 =¥ IIf I' \\,"1',', I ;/~I lliill!!C I -\ 1.-- :.J -~-i -f--1 ~,:, ". -' " -·1'" I.-.; .. 'r·~l 'lfl" URS ~ -. ~--. 1:ioI •• "' ........ !;UfE, .... SUTTl£, ..... '0' ~~l..'!;.mIO -. 'I_e i, ~, I- I h, I "- I "- I I I I I I-- I ~ '/ " - RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CLAYTON aCOTT FIELD RENTON, WASHINGTON -"...,.llIL.[, - ~ • " x c ® HISTIIIG IXItITOOIlS PHOf"OS[O CONTOURS f'IlOf'OSE{) CfI..IaJ«: Ut,jrfS EXlS1lNG STORII [IR.OJN PIPE EJ(ISTlHG EDGE DIWN [lIISI1MG SANJTARY S£W(R ~I'( EXISTING a.£ANOUT EXISTING Il/JlHOL[ EXlSllHC CATCH BASIN ADJUST OlSTING DRAI""'-G£ STRUCTURE RU '-'E'tII CATCH BASIN N£'oII ft· O.I.P. oon~ FIRE: WATER U~ ORAINAGE S1IIUCTlJRE -SEE SCi'£OOlE ON 0.02 BLAST WALL: ~{ GRADING PLAN RUNWAY BLAST WALL REPLACEt.4ENT GRADING PLAN I TI;fb .,,'''''' ti.t.'iE: ,~ L-! , 80 SCAL£ IN r£tT _ZOHTAL SCALE fM",MO.: _-":Q1I1\1" 111m' ... , IL\Sr WALl URS ~ -. ~-15111 ~~ A'IEIIII[, 5IJI'[ UIO ~ SUTll.l, W. "101 ~(_) ... _vao ''''l_IW __ - ~ BlAST WALllANDSIDE PROFILE (,\ Sc.IL.E: HONE @lY::Q), .~ . N'V ~ RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CLAYTON SCOTT FIELD RENTON, WASHINGTON ~ RUNWAY BLAST WAH REPLACEMENT -~ BlAST WAll LANDSIDE PROFILES ~. -1lAT(, .,,'''' NOTes: r FOR BlAST WAlL COI'ISfRIJCIION OCTAlLS, SEE SHEET C!i.Q1 BLAST WALL: ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION .., -~ III 8 ~ ~ HI I ' COO -iN -0 C'" ::;!c -c"->2 ZZ Gl ~~ ,~ -n '0 Oz ~ 0 r .. Sj 5 0 m '" " " 0 z ~ \: z '" 0 0 OJ C ;= " z " N --- SITE CONTROL & UTILITY DEMOLITION PLAN CITY OF RENTON ,;/ /j 8 ~~~:~ ~;;;;~ WHPaClfic "" .... ,_ ...... :0» _wA ... " <2>-.. , ...... , .. .,...., ..... ..-._",," GRASS -OS,;:;;--- ~I ~. ~-I , -,--'-'---'~-I I 1 i I I I I \ o L I '\ , o i I \ I \ I ;+--~~-",>0, ___ --~---_;;L',~ , 1·,1" \ I , I , I ... , I " I ~ :: \ -,:;;] I , ~ '\1 ~~--=-:=-f"~=='; -=----=----=--::.'.1_ l_ ~ .--~~-:!:-~~4f~'\i'\:;,~ ", _~I ----I,... "_",,~ .. ;_',_).,-\ \ 1 I!] ----=-.....::.=~.- ~O%, ~JRPORT WAY • t.'RPORT 'fiA,( ,-, , 'I I I i ~ 'f I I ~~;i I."; I I ,.? I \ I " . / '( Y / 1/1 I I I / , " I \" '.,. I i- I /' ~ \) ... ., .... ." I \ , II , L_ r I n " ~j g • .. .. i SCALE IN rUT HORI10NTAL SCAl.[ ~ .... O<SCIOI'IUI PIIIlI[et~ r ..... IkI., l URS oo ... u> "" BY RUNWAY BLAST WALL REPLACEMENT ~ .... _ .Ie .. RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 5>IW lIfU' CQA PII<l.lECf NO., ! CO'fU"-__ • • CLAYTON SCOTT FIELD' s.m NO.. " I~' OTII ~V[lIUE. ~ ,_ CltEOOEl> J. SR RENTON, WASHINGTON SITE PlAN . s£ATTI.£. 'IIA 18101 I -, ('.') a._m.:. > 5CM..i:' I .. m '''' (2(11) QII-Ht9 1.I"I'0IQVE1h &<: • AS SMOWN I TBD "" c 8 U U I~ z " m ~ " ~ !: m i I ~ \: ~ " m ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ , 0. S :::: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ " ~ z \: ~ " <"> i m ~ " \: m z @ z ~ • 0 ~ • >'" • -oz> ~ • r- ~ >~~ ~ " 0 z~;E ~ -oj!:: mr. 9 , I I , ' I I ; ' I , I I~ ' ' ,I Ii I I " " " ~ I I " '1 E ~ ." \ " --r I Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Vanessa, Ben Dahle Thursday, November 20, 20142:15 PM Vanessa Dolbee Jennifer 1. Henning; Vicki Grover FW: Concur with Monitoring Plan and !DP for Blast Wall Replacement RentonAirportJDP _04242014_BlastWaILpdf Follow up Flagged See below email/concurrence from DAHP for the attached Archeological Monitoring and Inadvertent Discovery Plan (IDP) for the Runway Blast Wall Replacement Project. I understand that with this concurrence from DAHP that the airport has met the blast wall demolition SEPA requirements and can move forward with the blast wall demo work. If not, please advise. -Ben From: Kaehler, Gretchen (DAHP) [mailto:Gretchen.Kaehler@DAHP.wa.govl Sent: Monday, September 08, 20143:02 PM To: Ben Dahle Cc: 'Iaura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us' (Iaura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us); DTS@gwestoffice.net; Dennis Lewarch; Butler, Stephanie; gwasser@rentonwa.gov Subject: re: Concur with Monitoring Plan and IDP for Blast Wall Replacement Hi Ben, We concur with the procedure and processes in the attached monitoring and inadvertent discovery plan for for the blast wall replacement at the Renton Airport. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Best, Gretchen Gretchen Kaehler Assistant State Archaeologist, Local Governments Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Olympia Ph:360-586-3088 Cell:360-628-2755 1 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY COVER SHEET Author: Stephanie Butler, URS Corporation Title of Report: Archaeological Monitoring and Inadvertent Discovery Plan for the Runway Blast Wall Replacement Project, King County, Washington Date of Report: April 2014 County(ies): King Section: LTownship: 23 N Range: 5 E Quad: Renton, WA Acres: 1.97 PDF of report submitted (REQUIRED) IX] Yes Historic Property Monitoring Forms to be Approved Online? 0 Yes IX] No Archaeological Site(s)/Isolate(s) Found or Amended? 0 Yes IX] No TCP(s) found? 0 Yes IX] No Replace a draft? 0 Yes IX] No Satisfy a DAHP Archaeological Excavation Permit reguirement? 0 Yes # Were Human Remains Found? 0 Yes DAHP Case # IX] No DAHP Archaeological Site #: • Submission of PDFs is required. IX] No • Please be sure that any PDF submitted to DAHP has its cover sheet. figures, graphics, appendices, attachments, correspondence, etc., compiled into one single PDF file. • Please check that the PDF displays correctly when opened. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES MONITORING AND INADVERTENT DISCOVERY PLAN Runway Blast Wall Replacement Project Renton Municipal Airport King County, Washington April 2014 Prepared for: Renton Municipal Airport 616 West Perimeter Road, Unit A Renton, WA 98057 OBS 111 SW Columbia, Suite 1500 Portland, Oregon 97201-5850 U RS Job No. 33764526 To avoid vandalism, restrict information in this report about the location of archaeological sites, as provided for by Section 304 of the National Historic Preservation Act, Section 9(a) of the Archaeological Resources Protection Act, and Washington law, RCW 27.53.070 and RCW 42.56.300 CONFIDENTIAL -NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Description ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Project Location ..................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Regulatory Context ................................................................................................................ 2 2.0 EXISTING AND POTENTIAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ...................................................... 4 3.0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING PLAN .................................................................................... 8 4.0 PROTOCOL FOR INADVERTENT DISCOVERY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ................... 11 5.0 PROTOCOL FOR INADVERTENT DISCOVERY OF HUMAN REMAINS ........................................ 13 6.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................ 15 FIGURES Figure 1. Project location map ............................................................................................................ 3 Figure 2. Aerial of the runway blast wall and the area to be monitored .......................................... 10 TABLES Table 1. Previously identified archaeological resources within 1 mile of the project ............................ 6 ATTACHMENTS Attachment A. Contacts for the inadvertent discovery of archaeological resources or human remains ............................................................................................................................................... 16 1.0 INTRODUCTION As part ofthe federal and state environmental review process, the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) requested, in a letter dated February 19, 2014, that an archaeological survey be conducted within the Runway Blast Wall Replacement Project (Project) area due to the high potential for archaeological resources. Because of the presence of pavement and construction fill throughout the Project area, an archaeological survey was not feasible. Therefore, archaeological monitoring is recommended during several activities associated with the Project. This Archaeological Resources Monitoring and Inadvertent Discovery Plan describe the procedures to be used during construction activities associated with the Project. 1.1 Project Description Renton Municipal Airport proposes to replace the existing runway blast wall at the south end of Runway 34 within the Renton Municipal Airport, Clayton Scott Field. The existing blast wall is approximately 190 feet wide by 22 feet tall, and was originally built to provide jet blast protection for West Perimeter Road and Airport Way, both south of the airfield. The original design aircraft for the existing blast wall was the Boeing 727, necessitating protection from the center jet of the three-engine plane. The Boeing 727 has since been replaced at Renton by production of the Boeing 737, which has a dual-engine configuration and hence no center jet. Additionally, the existing blast wall penetrates Runway 34's Future Non-Precision Approach Surface by approximately 7 feet. In order to establish the Future 34:1 Approach Surface, the existing wall needs to be replaced with a new, lower blast wall which does not penetrate the Future Non-Precision Approach Surface. West Perimeter Road, located south of the blast wall, contains two bends in the alignment around the existing blast wall that hinders optimalline-of-sight. The new blast wall will be constructed in a curved configuration loosely following the curve of West Perimeter Road. The curved configuration will also provide the surrounding community with a unique focal point highlighting the historic importance of Clayton Scott Field. Several art pieces will be constructed on the pedestrian side of the wall. The art would consist of both static historic Boeing aircraft pieces as well as a kinetic art boundary. Landscaping would also be added to the pedestrian side of the wall. Landscaping and artwork would be in accordance with future capital improvement projects at the airport. Ground-disturbing activities associated with the Project include: 1) the demolition of the existing blast wall, perimeter fence, and pavement north of the wall; 2) installation of drainage features and electrical items; 3) installation of the new blast wall and security fence; and 4) grading, irrigation, and landscaping to the west and south of the new blast wall and grass berms south of 1 West Perimeter Road. The ground-disturbing activities will occur in an area that was previously disturbed by the construction of the existing wall, landscaping features, and road. In addition, the blast wall is situated on fill material from the development of the airport. The Project is being funded primarily with FAA Airport Improvement Program funds. All work will be performed in accordance with applicable FAA regulations and FAA Advisory Circulars. 1.2 ProjectLocation The Project is located on Parcel Number 0723059007 in Section 7, Township 23 North, Range 5 East in Renton, King County, Washington (Figure 1). The blast wall is near the northwest part of Renton Municipal Airport at 616 West Perimeter Road, Renton, WA 98057. The project area is located north of West Perimeter Road and generally northeast of the intersection of Airport Way and Rainier Avenue North. The cumulative project impact area, including all ground-disturbing activities, is approximately 1.97 acres. 1.3 Regulatory Context Cultural resources, which include archaeological, ethnographic, and historical sites, are protected by a variety of federal and state laws, rules, and regulations. The Project is being carried out by Renton Municipal Airport under federal funds from the FAA; and therefore, the Project is subject to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as amended, and its implementing regulations (36 CFR 800). Section 106 requires federal agencies to identify and assess the effects of their undertaking on historic properties. Historic properties are those that are listed, or are eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and may include historic buildings or structures, archaeological sites, or traditional cultural properties. Eligible properties generally must be at least 50 years old, possess integrity of physical characteristics, and meet at least one of the four criteria of significance list in 36 C.F.R. § 60.4. In addition to federal laws and regulations, several Washington State laws address archaeological sites and Native American burials. The Archaeological Sites and Resources Act [RCW 27.53] prohibits knowingly excavating or disturbing prehistoric and historic archaeological sites on public or private land. The Indian Graves and Records Act [RCW 27.44] prohibits knowingly destroying American Indian graves and provides that inadvertent disturbance of human remains through construction or other activity requires re-interment under supervision of the appropriate Indian tribe. The Washington State Environmental Policy Act {SEPAl requires identification and evaluation of cultural resources as well as the development of plans for appropriate mitigation of cultural resources as part of the environmental review process. The Washington DAHP reviews projects subject to SEPA for their potential impacts to significant cultural resources and works with state agencies to avoid, minimize, and mitigate significant impacts. 2 USGS Remon (191]3) 7_~Io!I"'lIIpSer ... ~. T nON. R. ~OE. S"... 07 1.24,000 URS o APE AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS (APE) RENTON MUNICIPAL AiRPOPT RUNWAY 8:...AST WALL REPLACEMENT PROJECT KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON APRIL 2014 33ie~526 Figure 1. Project location map. 3 2.0 EXISTING AND POTENTIAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES The Project area and its vicinity was traditionally inhabited by the Ouwamish, who were one of over 50 southern Coast Salish tribal groups that traditionally frequented the Puget Sound Basin. The Ouwamish practiced a seasonal round that involved wintering in villages along the Ouwamish, Black, and Cedar Rivers as well as Lake Washington, Lake Union, and Elliot Bay, and camping during the warmer months to hunt, fish, and gather food (Suttles and Lane 1990; Ruby and Brown 1992). Intensive Euro-American historic use of the area occurred by the middle 1800s, when emigrants claimed land throughout the region and engaged in agricultural practices. Historic maps, including an 1865 GLO plat, show that the Project was located in the Cedar River fan and within the donation land claim (OLe) of H. H. Tobin. Previous cultural resource investigations have documented archaeological sites and isolates, demonstrating archaeological sensitivity within the vicinity of the Project. A search of records on file at the Washington OAHP identified 12 archaeological sites within one mile of the Project. The sites consist of five precontact, five historic period, and two mUltiple component archaeological sites. Nine of the archaeological sites are listed as unevaluated for listing in the NRHP, and one site is listed as ineligible for listing in the NRHP (Table 1). The five historic-period archaeological sites are 4sKIs38, the Columbia and Puget Sound Railroad grade; 4sKIs42, a debris scatter and concrete foundations; 4sKI7s9, ca. 1900-1940 debris scatter; 4sKI848, remnants of the Renton Glass Company Factory; and 4sKl1009, the Moses homestead consisting of a domestic debris concentration from the early to mid-20th century. The closest historic-period archaeological site to the Project is 4sKI009, the Moses Homestead, located approximately 0.15 south of the APE. The historic-period archaeological deposits at the Moses Homestead were concentrated between 30 and 120 centimeters below surface (cm) along the eastern edge of a former flood channel in front of the former house. No evidence of the house or associated outbuildings was observed (Shong and Rinck 2011). The precontact sites include 4sKIOs9, a late precontact-period camp or winter village; 4sKIs01 (Renton High School Indian Site), a shell midden site as identified in two strata; 4sKIs87, the ca. 500-300 BP Little Cedar River Fishing Station site (Oexudidew); 4sKI686, two precontact hearth features; and 4sKI1010 (Renton High School Ballfield Site), a camp with lithic material identified in two loci. Sites 4sKIs01 and 4sKI101O are located approximately 0.25 and 0.19 mile to the south of the APE, respectively. The archaeological deposits at 4sKIs01 were identified approximately three feet below the ground surface and separated by layers of culturally-sterile flood alluvium and represented several precontact occupations. The occupation surfaces, dating between 500 and 200 BP, were marked by discrete areas of burned sediments containing small fragments of charcoal, ash, and calcined fish, and mammal bone (Kramer et al. 4 2001; Lewarch 2006). The archaeological deposits at 45Kl1010 are composed of two distinct cultural components, Locus A and Locus B. Locus A consists of lithic artifacts restricted to the upper 60 cm of interbedded, non-organic silty sediments that overlay coarse sand and gravels, and Locus B consists of charcoal-rich sediments, fire modified rock, lithic artifacts, and calcined (burned) fish remains between approximately 140 and 200 cmbs (Shong and Rinck 2011). The coarse sand and gravel encountered during the field study demarcate the bottom of abandoned flood channels (flood event), which were in-filled with fine-grain alluvium. The occupation surfaces were found in the fine-grained flood alluvium above and below well-drained sandy soils (Shong and Rinck 2011). The background research suggests that the Project area has a potential for containing precontact, ethnohistoric, and historic-period archaeological resources. The Project is close to a number of late precontact and historic-period archaeological sites situated along the former banks of the Black and Cedar rivers. Despite the potential for archaeological findings within the undisturbed native material, the construction effort for the proposed projects is believed to be within the envelope of previously disturbed material and consequently does not pose a strong likelihood for archaeological findings. Due to the nature and depth of construction, URS recommends an on-site professional archaeologist be present when excavations occur below the fill material in native deposits. Boring logs and record drawings indicate fill material at least three feet below grade. Shallow surface excavation, clearing and grubbing, and similar grading will be governed by standard excavation protocols in relation to discovery of archaeological findings per Project contract specifications, Section 1.07.16(4}. 5 Table 1. Previously Identified Archaeological Resources within 1 Mile ofthe Project. Site Site Class Site Type NRHP Attributes Distance to Date Size Report # Number Status Project Recorded 45KI051 Multiple Precontact Camp, U The ca. 1790-1860s site consists a 0.58 mi 01/10/1991 250-x-100 m 1330265 Component Precontact Burial, longhouse that are likely the remains of Depth 1 m 1330271, Historic Debris the ethnographic village Sba'badi'd as 1330288, Scatter well as a historic debris scatter possibly 1330306, representing the Williams Camp era. 1330671, 1331023 4SKIOS9 Precontact Precontact Camp U The site consists of a black, organic 0.80 mi 10/15/1980 30-x-20 m 1330265 midden and hearth units possibly Depth 0.5 m 1330271, representing a winter village of the late 1330288, precontact period. 1330306, 1330668, 1330671, 1331034 4SKI439 Multiple Historic Debris U The Renton Sears-Fred Meyer Store site 0.62 mi 12/15/1994 30-x-S m 1334401, Component Scatter, consists of precontact midden deposits, Depth 2S-140 1340875 Precontact Camp five hearths, and historic-period refuse cmbs deposits. i 45KI501 Precontact Precontact Shell U The Renton High School Indian Site 0.25 mi 05/02/2001 17 m east-west 1339902, Midden consists of two archaeological strata Depth 2 m. 1339903, separated by flood deposits. The strata 1339905, were discovered during construction 1340709, and consist of black to dark brown silt 1346243, sand that include charcoal and bone 1347769 fragments, burned soil, ash/ and areas I with gravel associated with burned earth. The second strata consisted of a black organic sand layer. 45KI538 Historic Historic Railroad U The site consists of the ca. 1874 to 0.58 06/10/1996 16.6 mi 1682524 Properties present Columbia and Puget Sound Railroad grade. 4SKI542 Historic Historic Debris U The site consists of a historic debris 1.0 mi 04/19/1996 200-x-3S0 ft. N/A Scatter and scatter and concrete foundations. .- 6 Site Site Class Site Type NRHP Attributes Distance to Date Size Report # Number Status Project Recorded Structures 45KI587 Precontact Precontact U The ca. 500-300 BP Little Cedar River 0.30 mi 11/26/2003 7-x-1 m 1343395 Fishing Station Fishing Site (Dexudidew) consists of two Depth 45-60 occupation surfaces, each two to four cmbs centimeters thick, in alluvial floodplain sediments of the Black River. 45KI686 Precontact Precontact U The site consists of two hearth features 0.95 mi 06/06/2003 100-x-85 ft. 1342536, Feature in floodplain deposits of the Cedar Depth 10-95 1343167 River. cmbs 45KI759 Historic Historic Debris U The ca. 1900-1940 debris scatter 0.78 mi 01/17/2007 36-x-13 m 1682766 Scatter includes ceramic and bottle glass Depth 1.4 m fragments, mammal fragments, milled wood! and metal. 45KI848 Historic Historic NE The site consists of remains of the 0.91 mi 01/14/2009 115-x-24 ft. N/A Commercial Renton Glass Company Factory, Properties including a concrete foundation and retaining wall and aggregate posts. 45Kl1009 Historic Historic Debris U The Moses Homestead is an early to 0.15 mi 03/15/2011 64-x-49-m 1681688 Scatter, Historic middle 20'" century domestic debris Depth 20-180 Homestead scatter in the vicinity of the homestead, cmbs as depicted on early maps. Most of the historic debris was encountered below I fill (30-120 cmbs) just west of the former house. 45Kl1010 Precontact Precontact Camp, U The site consists of two loci. Locus A 0.19 mi 3/15/2011 350-x-400-m 1681688 Precontact lithic consists of lithic artifacts in the upper Depth 20-220 Material 60 cm. Locus B consists of charcoal-rich cmbs sediments, FCR, lithic artifacts, and calcined fish remains between 140 and 200 cmbs. -- 7 3.0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING PLAN Construction monitoring for archaeological resources will occur during excavation below fill material as indicated in Section 2.0. Archaeological monitoring will be conducted by a professional archaeologist who meets the Secretary of Interior's Professional Qualification Standards (36 CFR Part 61) and Washington State Statutes (RCW 27.S3.030[l1]). The professional archaeologist will be present to observe excavation activities and examine soil for potential archaeological resources. Monitoring will apply to the replacement of the runway blast wall and associated ground- disturbing activities (Figure 2). The airport's engineer or the construction contractor will brief the archeologist on any health and safety elements under which the archaeologist will perform the monitoring. The archaeologist will wear the proper personal protective equipment (e.g., hard hat, steel toed shoes, and safety glasses) as required for project health and safety. The airport will arrange for the archaeologist to brief the construction supervisor(s) about the procedures for the event of encountering archaeological deposits and human remains described herein. Renton Municipal Airport will inform all construction contractor(s) about the archaeological monitoring procedures and protocols. The airport will authorize the archaeologist to pause ground disturbing and earth moving construction activities periodically, as needed, for a closer examination of newly exposed sediments and/or historic-period and precontact period artifacts. When on site, the archaeologist shall check in daily with contractor and owner's representative to coordinate inspection activities. Archaeologists interacting with heavy equipment operations will comply with the following rules of engagement: a. Wear high-visibility protective vests and proper personal protective equipment when in work areas with any operating equipment. b. No standing or working in the equipment operator's blind spots. c. May only enter the work area of any operating equipment when: 1. They have attracted the operator's attention and made eye contact. 2. The operator has idled the equipment down, placed it in neutral, grounded engaging tools, and set brakes. 3. The operator gives the ground personnel permission to approach. d. Never walk or position themselves between any fixed object and operating equipment, or between two operating pieces of equipment. During construction, the archaeological monitor will examine soils, including excavations and back-dirt piles. Equipment will include, as appropriate, a shovel, trowel, and screen of X-inch mesh hardware cloth. The archaeologist will monitor for prehistoric or historic-period artifacts 8 or layers/lenses of organic material, or organically enriched soils that might indicate past human use. The airport will inform the construction contractor(s) about the archaeologist's monitoring work and this monitoring plan. The archaeological monitor will have copy of the monitoring plan and the health and safety plan on site. The archaeologist will record the details of the activities on monitoring forms for each day on which monitoring is conducted. Activities recorded will include descriptions of the construction area, excavation methods, cultural materials, soil profiles, sketches, and photographs. The archaeological monitor will submit a daily monitoring report to the Airport Engineer at the Renton Municipal Airport. When monitoring work has been completed, the archaeologist will prepare a final monitoring report discussing the methods and results of the work. The report will be submitted to the consulting parties. State of Washington Archaeological Site inventory Forms or Archaeological Isolate Forms will be included as necessary. These documents are confidential and exempt from disclosure under federal and state law (Section 304 of the NHPA; RCW 27.53.070 and RCW 42.56.300). 9 s.. ,.<-, E;". ,,,~,,' '" ><'0, ,;,:." ~(,. ("", "', ~",",,~pm~.~. ·~,"t. 'GN_IU.",,, .h. (;1> '." (,_"n. ,,,. URS RUNWAY BLAST WALL :-':=-i-H . .:;r" r:1:JI\I,-=':,F . .l,l A~RF");:;:T 1-,'Ut\'('J<.Y ~~L<;-'h',\LL S[f..'LU.::.t.r-.,1=.i.:i f-'h'':'~ltU i,II'j,:o, ,:-':,u'H r'. v",,-P'SH:N:;' -:)r·. ,;";"i:':IL ;':Ul"; 2,?,7(,c:~.'6 Figure 2. Aerial of the runway blast wall and the area to be monitored. 10 4.0 PROTOCOL FOR INADVERTENT DISCOVERY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Potentially significant archaeological materials have been identified in the vicinity and may be present within the Project area. Types of archaeological materials that may be encountered could include, but are not limited to: flaked stone tools and lithic debitage, charcoal-rich sediments, fire-modified rock, concentrations of shell or faunal remains, organic materials (basketry, wooden posts, bone and wooden artifacts), and concentrations of historic-period bottles, ceramics, and cans. This section identifies the key responsibilities in the event of a discovery of an item of potential cultural significance during the Project. In the unanticipated event of a discovery, the following steps shall be taken: Step 1. Stop Work and Protect the Discovery Site. If any agency employee, contractor, or subcontractor believes that he or she has uncovered any cultural resources, all work within a minimum of 50 feet of the discovery ("discovery site") shall be stopped to provide for its security, protection, and integrity. The discovery site shall be secured. Vehicles, equipment, and unauthorized personnel will not be permitted to traverse the discovery site. Step 2. Notify Project Management. The individual making the discovery shall immediately contact the Airport Engineer and notify him or her of the discovery site. If the Airport Engineer is not immediately available, then the Airport Manager shall be contacted. Step 3. Notify Project Archaeologist. Immediately following the work stoppage and notification to Project Management, the Project Archaeologist, if not already present at the site, shall be contacted. Step 4. Assess Find. The Project Archaeologist shall be qualified as a professional archaeologist under 36 CFR Part 61 and RCW 27.53.030(11), and as such, is qualified to examine the find to determine if it is an archaeological site. If the Project Archaeologist determines that the find is not an archaeological resource, work may proceed with no further delay. If the Project Archaeologist determines the discovery potentially eligible for listing in the NRHP and the archaeological deposits cannot be avoided, archaeological site testing and evaluation to determine the significance of the cultural resource may be required. All work will be suspended in the area and the area protected until a permit from DAHP can be applied for and issued (RCW 27.53). Any type of archaeological testing or mitigation will depend upon the nature of the resource and would be developed as part of the DAHP permit, in consultation with the FAA and the appropriate Tribes. Step 5. Notify Additional Parties. If the discovery is determined by the Project Archaeologist to be a potentially NRHP-eligible archaeological resource, the Airport Engineer will continue with 11 notification to the FAA and DAHP within one (1) working day. If the remains are precontact or Native American, the FAA will notify and consult with the affected Tribes. If the find may relate to human remains or funerary objects, protocol outlined in the following section regarding human remains shall be enacted. Confidentiality of the find shall be maintained by Renton Municipal Airport and its contractors. Step 6. Obtain Consent to Proceed with Construction. Construction work shall not recommence at the discovery site until treatment has been completed and the FAA, DAHP, and the Tribes, as appropriate, have provided written or verbal consent to proceed. 12 5.0 PROTOCOL FOR INADVERTENT DISCOVERY OF HUMAN REMAINS If likely or confirmed human remains are encountered, all further ground-disturbing activities will cease immediately. Any human remains that are discovered during construction of the project will be treated with dignity and respect. The following procedures will be enacted: Step 1. Stop Work and Protect the Discovery Site. In the event that an employee, contractor, or subcontractor believes that he or she has uncovered any human skeletal remains, the Construction Supervisor will stop all work within a minimum of 50 feet of the remains to provide for their total security, protection, and integrity. Remains will immediately be covered with a tarp only, for temporary protection in place and to shield them from being photographed. The discovery location will not be left unsecured at any time, and confidentiality will be maintained by the Renton Municipal Airport and its contractors. The Project Archaeologist, if on site at the time of the discovery, can assist with implementation of these procedures. Step 2. Notify Project Management. The Construction Supervisor will immediately contact the Renton Municipal Airport's Engineer and notify him or her of the situation. If the Airport Engineer is not immediately available, then the Airport Manager will be contacted. Step 3. Notify Law Enforcement and County Coroner's Office. If human remains are known or suspected, the Airport Engineer or his/her designee will notify the City of Renton Police Department and the King County Medical Examiner's Office in the most expeditious manner possible (RCW 27.44; 68.S0; 68.60). The County Coroner will determine ifthe remains are human, whether the discovery site constitutes a crime scene, and will notify DAHP if the remains are non-forensic. Local law enforcement and/or the County Medical Examiner may need to access the discovery area to make any determinations and cannot be prohibited from doing so. Step 4. Notify Tribes, FAA, and DAHP. Concurrently, the Airport Engineer will immediately notify the affected Tribes, DAHP, FAA, and the Project Archaeologist. Per RCW 27.44, 68.S0, and 68.60, DAHP will have jurisdiction over non-forensic human remains from non-Federal and non-Tribal land and report them to cemeteries and affected Tribes. The State Physical Anthropologist will make a determination of whether the remains are Indian or Non-Indian and report that finding to any appropriate cemeteries and affected tribes (RCW 27.44, 68.50, 68.60). DAHP will handle all consultation with affected parties as to the preservation, excavation, and disposition of the remains. Step 6. Obtain Consent to Proceed with Construction. Ground-disturbing activities will not resume at the location of the discovery area and the construction buffer until the FAA, DAHP, 13 and the affected Tribes, as appropriate, have provided written consent to proceed. The archaeological monitor will prepare a report describing the treatment actions as part of the Monitoring Report. 14 6.0 REFERENCES DAHP (Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation) 2013 Washington State Standards for Cultural Resource Reporting. Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. Kramer, Stephanie, Leonard A. Forsman, Dennis E. Lewarch, and Lynn L. Larson 2001 Renton High School Archaeological Resources and Traditional Cultural Places Assessment, King County, Washington. Prepared for Renton School District No. 403. Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services Limited, LAAS Technical Report #2001- 23. Gig Harbor, Washington. Lewarch, Dennis E. 2006 Renton High School Indian Site (45KI501) Archaeological data recovery, King County, Washington. Submitted to Renton School District 403. Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services, Gig Harbor. Ruby, Robert H. and John A. Brown 1992 A Guide to the Indian Tribes of the Pacific Northwest. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman and London. Revised 1992. Shong, Michael and Brandy Rinck 2011 Archaeological Assessment for Phase I of the Renton High School Field Improvement Project, King County, Washington. Prepared for Renton School District No. 403 and D.A. Hogan & Associates, Inc. Northwest Archaeological Associates Report Number WAll-015. Suttles, Wayne and Barbara Lane 1990 Southern Coast Salish. In, Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 7: Northwest Coast, edited by W. Suttles, pp. 485-502. Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. 15 Attachment A: Contacts for the Inadvertent Discovery of Archaeological Resources or Human Remains Name Organization Role Phone Ben Dahle Renton Airport Airport Engineer 425-430-7476 Ryan Zulauf Renton Airport Airport Manager 425-430-7471 Stephanie Butler URS Principal Archaeologist 503-478-2767 Andy Carpenter URS Project Manager 206-438-2153 Cayla Morgan FAA Environmental Protection Specialist 425-227-2653 Rob Whitlam DAHP State Archaeologist 360-586-3080 Gretchen Kaehler DAHP Assistant State Archaeologist 360-586-3088 Dr. Guy Tasa DAHP State Physical Anthropologist 360-790-1633 Cecile Hanson Duwamish Tribe Tribal Chair 206-431-1582 James Rasmussen Duwamish Tribe Cultural Resources 206-431-1582 Charlotte Williams Muckleshoot Tribe Tribal Chair 253-969-3311 x 3194 Laura Murphy Muckleshoot Tribe Archaeologist 253-876-3272 Denis Lewarch Suquamish Tribe THPO 360-394-8529 leonard Forsman Suquamish Tribe Tribal Chair 360-394-8461 Richard Haruff King County Medical Officer/Coroner 206-731-3232 Non-Emergency Contact City of Renton PD Local Law Enforcement 425-235-2121 16 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: April 9, 2014 To: City Clerk's Office From: Lisa Marie Mcelrea Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office Project Name: Renton Airport Runway Blast Wall Replacement and 820 Building Demo Project LUA (file) Number: LUA-14-000133 Cross-References: AKA's: Renton Airport Demolition Projects; Blast Wal Project Manager: Vanessa Dolbee Acceptance Date: February 5, 2014 Applicant: City of Renton Owner: City of Renton Contact: Ben Dahle, City of Renton PID Number: 0723059007 ERC Determination: DNS-M Date: February 24, 2014 Appeal Period Ends: March 14 2014 Administrative Decision: Date: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Appeal Period Ends: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: Applicant proposes to demolish the existing 30,000 sf 820 Building and an existing 22-foot high blast wall at the Renton Municipal Airport. The project area is located north of W Perimeter Rd and is generally northeast of the intersection of Airport Way and Rainier Ave N. Location: 616 and 820 W. Perimeter Road Comments: ERC Determination Types: DNS -Determination of Non-Significance; DNS-M -Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated; DS -Determination of Significance. PLAN REVIEW COMMENT LUA14-000133) _ --~- PLAN ADDRESS: W 616 PERIMETER RD RENTON, WA 98057-5327 APPLICATION DATE: 02/03/2014 DESCRIPTION: Applicant proposes to demolish the existing 30,000 sf 820 Building and an existing 22-foot high blast wall at the Renton Municipal Airport. Engineering Review April 09, 2014 The project area is located north ofW Perimeter Rd and is generally northeast of the intersection of Airport Way and Rainier Ave N. The 820 Building is located at 820 W Perimeter Rd, south of the entrance to the airport from Rainier Ave N (APN 0723059007). The demolition would result in the removal of approximately 800 cy of concrete, asphalt, and native base/foundation bedding rock. Grading would occur following demolition and would result in filling the site at-grade with approx. 1,400 tons of WSDOT crushed surfacing base course. The existing 22-foot high blast wall is located at the south end of the airport (616 W Perimeter Road, APN 0723059007). Regrading of the infield and grass areas would be required for the project. In addition, limited grading would occur within the blast pad pavement to provide positive drainage while lowering the end of the existing grade adjacent to the new blast wall in order to ensure that the new blast wall is below the Future Non-Precision Approach Surface. A new blast wall, approximately 12.75 feet in height would be constructed in the vicinity of the new wall. Approximately 500 cubic yards of fill would be needed for the project, and would be provided from approved borrow sources. The site is zoned 1M, and is located within the 500-year flood hazard area. There is a landslide hazard area south of the existing blast wall and a seismic area in the vicinity. Jan lilian Ph: 425-430-7216 email: jillian@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: Storm Drainage 1. Erosion control shall comply with the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual. 2. Drainage review is not triggered by this project. General 1. Cut and cap permits for utilities will be required as part of the demolition permit Page 1 of 1 Vanessa Dolbee From: Ben Dahle Sent: To: Tuesday, April 01,20149:57 AM Jennifer T. Henning; Vanessa Dolbee Subject: Attachments: FW: lOP for 820 Demolition Building Project, King County, WA-DAHP review comments RentonAirporUDP _03262014.pdf; Detail_Report_1564619.pdf; Detail_Report_1564625.pdf Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Good morning, Follow up Flagged Attached is the Archaeological Monitoring and Inadvertent Discovery Plan (lOP) for the 820 Building. Based on the email from Gretchen and Stephanie, we have verbal approval. Attached are the SHPO determinations of the 800 and 820 buildings -DAHP has determined both resources to Not be eligible on 3-13-2014 (on page 1 of each of the Historical Inventory Report (Detail Report) forms almost at the bottom of the page). Due to proximity of the 800 building to the 820 we had to evaluate both. I understand that with these approvals/determinations from DAHP that I have met my 820 building demolition SEPA requirements and can move forward with the 820 demo work. If not please advise. Thanks for talking with Camryn yesterday! She had a good time meeting and hearing what other girls do at work. © Ben From: Butler, Stephanie [mailto:steDhanie.butler@urs.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 9:12 AM To: Kaehler, Gretchen (DAHP) Cc: Carpenter, Andy; Ben Dahle Subject: RE: !DP for 820 Demolition Building Project, King County, WA-DAHP review comments Hi Gretchen, Attached is the revised lOP, per your suggestions below. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Stephanie Stephanie Butler I Senior Archaeologist Direct 503.478.27671 Main: 503.222.7200 stephanie.butler@urs.com URS Corporation 111 SW Columbia. Suite 1500 I Portland. OR 97201 I www.urs.com From: Kaehler, Gretchen (DAHP) [mailto:Gretchen.Kaehler@DAHP.wa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 4:59 PM To: Butler, Stephanie Cc: Carpenter, Andy; Ranzetta, Kirk; Ben Dahle Subject: RE: !DP for 820 Demolition Building Project, King County, WA-DAHP review comments 1 Hi Stephanie, I think the attached is fine with a few revisions: • Remove the last two sentences on Pg. 2 that deals with NHPA. I am not sure of its purpose. This is not a Section 106 project and I think this is just going to confuse people. • On page 10, under Step 4. Assess Find; replace the word "significance" with "nature". Since the resources that are most likely to be present are precontact, significance does not matter as they are considered protected under state laws. • Revise the above and then send us a final copy please and that should be fine. Thank you, Gretchen Gretchen Kaehler Assistant State Archaeologist, Local Governments Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Olympia Ph:360-586-3088 Cell:360-628-2755 From: Murray, Peggy [mailto:peggy.murray@urs.com] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 20143:51 PM To: Kaehler, Gretchen (DAHP) Cc: Carpenter, Andy; Butler, Stephanie; Ranzetta, Kirk Subject: IDP for 820 Demolition Building Project, King County, WA Good Afternoon Gretchen, Please find attached the Archaeological Monitoring and Inadvertent Discovery Plan for the 820 Demolition Building Project, King County, Washington. Should you have any questions regarding this plan, please contact Andy Carpenter at the email above. Regards, Peggy Murray I URS Corporation I 1501 4th Avenue, Suite 1400 Seattle, WA 98101-1616 I Tel: 206-438-2240 I Cell: 425-205-1634 This e-mail and any attachments contain URS Corporation confidential information that may be proprietary or privileged. If you receive this message in error or are not the intended recipient, you should not retain, distribute, disclose or use any of this information and you should destroy the 8-mail and any attachments or copies. 2 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY COVER SHEET Author: Stephanie Butler and Anisa Becker, URS Corporation Title of Report: Archaeological Monitoring and Inadvertent Discovery Plan for the 820 Demolition Building Project. King County, Washington Date of Report: March 2014 County(ies): King Section: LTownship: 23 N Range: 5 E Quad: Renton, WA Acres: 0,51 PDF of report submitted (REQUIRED) [XJ Yes Historic Property Monitoring Forms to be Approved Online? D Yes [Xl No Archaeological Site(sllisolate(s) Found or Amended? 0 Yes [Xl No TCP(s) found? D Yes [Xl No Replace a draft? 0 Yes [Xl No Satisfy a DAHP Archaeological Excavation Permit requirement? DYes # [Xl No Were Human Remains Found? DYes DAHP Case # [Xl No DAHP Archaeological Site #: • Submission of PDFs is required. • Please be sure that any PDF submitted to DAHP has its cover sheet, figures, graphics, appendices, attachments, correspondence, etc., compiled into one single PDF file. • Please check that the PDF displays correctly when opened. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES MONITORING AND INADVERTENT DISCOVERY PLAN 820 Building Demolition Project Renton Municipal Airport King County, Washington March 2014 Prepared for: Renton Municipal Airport 616 West Perimeter Road, Unit A Renton, WA 98057 111 SW Columbia, Suite 1500 Portland, Oregon 97201-5850 UR5 Job No. 33764526 To avoid vandalism, restrict information in this report about tile location of archaeological sites, as provided for by Section 304 of the National Historic Preservation Act, Section 9(a) of the Archaeological Resources Protection Art, and Washington law, RCW 27.53.070 and RCW 42.56.300 CONFIDENTIAL -NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Description ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Project Location ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Regulatory Context ................................................................................................................ 2 2.0 EXISTING AND POTENTIAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ..................................................... .4 3.0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING PLAN .................................................................................... 7 4.0 PROTOCOL FOR INADVERTENT DISCOVERY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ................... 10 5.0 PROTOCOL FOR INADVERTENT DISCOVERY OF HUMAN REMAINS ........................................ 12 6.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................ 14 FIGURES Figure 1. Project location map ........................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2. Aerial of the 820 Building and the area to be monitored ................................................................... 9 TABLES Table 1. Previously identified archaeological resources within 1 mile of the project ............................ 6 ATTACHMENTS Attachment A. Contacts for the inadvertent discovery of archaeological resources or human remains ............................................................................................................................................... 15 1.0 INTRODUCTION As part ofthe Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review process, the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) requested, in a letter dated February 19, 2014, that an archaeological survey be conducted within the 820 Building Demolition Project area due to the high potential for archaeological resources. Because of the presence of pavement throughout the Project area, an archaeological survey was not feasible. Therefore, archaeological monitoring is recommended during several activities associated with the Project. This Archaeological Resources Monitoring and Inadvertent Discovery Plan describe the procedures to be used during construction activities associated with the 820 Building Demolition Project. 1.1 Project Description Renton Municipal Airport proposes to demolish the 820 building within airport property in Renton, King County, Washington. The 820 Building is located on the west side of the airport and north of the airport's maintenance building. The building contains, from ground up: first floor and second floor mezzanine. The building was originally constructed in 1963 as an electronics manufacturing facility known as Electronics Laboratory Building 5-14 for Boeing. However, over the years the primary use has changed, and the building is now vacant. The demolition of the 820 building includes the removal of the building from the airport property, removal of hazardous materials from the building, structural changes required due to connection of the building to the adjacent building, modifications to the existing utilities, and adjustments to the site necessary due to the building removal. The ground-disturbing activities, including the building demolition, the utility disconnects, and limited excavation to remove the column footings to 3 feet below ground surface, will occur in an area that was previously disturbed by the construction of the original building. In addition, the 820 building is situated on fill material from the development of the airport. There are no plans at this time for new construction at the building site. The demolition of the 820 Building is anticipated to begin in March 2014, and the total duration of the demolition would be approximately 90 working days. 1.2 Project Location The Project is located on Parcel Number 0723059007 in Section 7, Township 23 North, Range 5 East in Renton, King County, Washington (Figure 1). The 820 building is near the northwest part of Renton Municipal Airport at 820 West Perimeter Road, Renton, WA 98057. The Project is located south of the airport entrance from Rainier Avenue North. The cumulative project impact area, including all ground-disturbing activities, is approximately 0.51 acre. 1 1.3 Regulatory Context Cultural resources, which include archaeological, ethnographic, and historical sites, are protected by a variety of federal and state laws, rules, and regulations. No federal funds, licenses, or permits are required for this Project; however, several Washington State laws address archaeological sites and Native American burials. The Archaeological Sites and Resources Act [RCW 27.53] prohibits knowingly excavating or disturbing prehistoric and historic archaeological sites on public or private land. The Indian Graves and Records Act [RCW 27.44] prohibits knowingly destroying American Indian graves and provides that inadvertent disturbance of human remains through construction or other activity requires re-interment under supervision of the appropriate Indian tribe. The Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires identification and evaluation of cultural resources as well as the development of plans for appropriate mitigation of cultural resources as part of the environmental review process. The Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) reviews projects subject to SEPA for their potential impacts to significant cultural resources and works with state agencies to avoid, minimize, and mitigate significant impacts. Although there is no Federal nexus for the 820 Building Demolition Project, regulations for implementing Section 106 of the NHPA (36 CFR 800) provide useful guidelines for this assessment. 2 .--} !'II ;j"' t // / '. USGSR9Ilton(1003) 7 5 h4,nUle SerieS. T 2.J...ON. R frQE. Sec 07 1 24.000 URS ("' v " >" , ~ Cat~:5n loi!11 x; . ;f'- C' .J tv DAPE c. RENTON MUNICIPAL A.IRPORT 820 BUILDING DEMOLITION PROJECT KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON j::EBRUARY 20M 33764526 Figure 1. Project location map. 3 2.0 EXISTING AND POTENTIAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES The Project area and its vicinity was traditionally inhabited by the Duwamish, who were one of over SO southern Coast Salish tribal groups that traditionally frequented the Puget Sound Basin. The Duwamish practiced a seasonal round that involved wintering in villages along the Duwamish, Black, and Cedar Rivers as well as Lake Washington, Lake Union, and Elliot Bay, and camping during the warmer months to hunt, fish, and gather food (Suttles and Lane 1990; Ruby and Brown 1992). Intensive Euro-American historic use of the area occurred by the middle 1800s, when emigrants claimed land throughout the region and engaged in agricultural practices. Historic maps, including an 1865 GLO map, show that the Project was located in the Cedar River fan, and a historic trail extended approximately 0.25 mile to the south of the Project. Previous cultural resource investigations have documented archaeological sites and isolates, demonstrating archaeological sensitivity within the vicinity of the Project. A search of records on file at the Washington DAHP identified four archaeological sites within one mile of the Project. The sites consist of two historic-period and two precontact-era archaeological sites. All four of the archaeological sites are listed as unevaluated for listing in the NRHP (Table 1). The two historic-period archaeological sites are 45K1404, a military property consisting of an aircraft submerged in Lake Washington, and 4SK11009, the Moses homestead consisting of a domestic debris concentration from the early to mid-20th century. The historic-period archaeological deposits at the Moses Homestead were concentrated between 30 and 120 centimeters below surface (cm) along the eastern edge of a former flood channel in front of the former house. No evidence of the house or associated outbuildings was observed (Shong and Rinck 2011). The precontact sites are 45KIS01 (Renton High School Indian Site), a shell midden site as identified in two strata, and 45KIl010 (Renton High School Ballfield Site), a camp with lithic material identified in two loci. The archaeological deposits at 45KI501 were identified approximately three feet below the ground surface and separated by layers of culturally-sterile flood alluvium and represented several precontact occupations. The occupation surfaces, dating between 500 and 200 BP, were marked by discrete areas of burned sediments containing small fragments of charcoal, ash, and calcined fish, and mammal bone (Kramer et al. 2001; Lewarch 2006). The archaeological deposits at 45Kl1010 are composed of two distinct cultural components, Locus A and Locus B. Locus A consists of lithic artifacts restricted to the upper 60 cm of interbedded, non-organic silty sediments that overlay coarse sand and gravels, and Locus B consists of charcoal-rich sediments, fire modified rock, lithic artifacts, and calcined (burned) fish remains between approximately 140 and 200 cmbs (Shong and Rinck 2011). The 4 coarse sand and gravel encountered during the field study demarcate the bottom of abandoned flood channels (flood event), which were in-filled with fine-grain alluvium. The occupation surfaces were found in the fine-grained flood alluvium above and below well-drained sandy soils (Shong and Rinck 2011). The background research suggests that the Project area has a potential for containing precontact, ethnohistoric, and historic-period archaeological resources. The Project is close to a number of late precontact and historic-period archaeological sites situated along the former banks of the Black and Cedar rivers. Despite the potential for archaeological findings within the undisturbed native material, the construction effort for the proposed projects is believed to be within the envelope of previously disturbed material and consequently does not pose a strong likelihood for archaeological findings. Due to the nature and depth of construction, URS recommends an on-site professional archaeologist be present when excavations occur below the fill material in native deposits. Boring logs and record drawings indicate fill material at least three feet below grade. Shallow surface excavation, clearing and grubbing, and similar grading will be governed by standard excavation protocols in relation to discovery of archaeological findings per Project contract specifications, Section 1.07.16(4). 5 Table 1. Previously Identified Archaeological Resources within 1 Mile ofthe Project. Site Site Class Site Type NRHP Attributes Distance to Date Size Report 1# Number Status Project Recorded 45KI404 Historic Historic Military U The site consists of a submerged twin 0.50 mi. 01/26/1989 unknown 1348761 Properties engine patrol aircraft, the Martin PMN north Mariner. 45KI501 Precontact Pre contact Shell U The Renton High School Indian Site 1 mi. south 5/02/2001 17 m east-west 1339902, Midden consists of two archaeological strata Depth 2 m. 1339903, separated by flood depOSits. The strata 1339905, were discovered during construction 1340709, and consist of black to dark brown silt 1346243, sand that include charcoal and bone 1347769 fragments} burned soil, ash, and areas with gravel associated with burned earth. The second strata consisted of a black organic sand layer. 45Kl1009 Historic Historic Debris U The Moses Homestead is an early to 1 mi. south 03/15/2011 64-x-49-m 1681688 Scatter, Historic middle 20th century domestic debris Depth 20-180 Homestead scatter in the vicinity of the homestead, cmbs as depicted on early maps. Most of the historic debris was encountered below fill (30-120 cmbs) just west of the former house. 45Kl1010 Precontact Precontact Camp, U The site consists of two loci. Locus A 1 mi. south 3/15/2011 350-x-400-m 1681688 Precontact Lithic consists of lithic artifacts in the upper Depth 20-220 Material 60 cm. Locus B consists of charcoal-rich cmbs sediments, FCR, lithic artifacts, and calcined fish remains between 140 and 200 cmbs. 6 3.0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING PLAN Construction monitoring for archaeological resources will occur during excavation below fill material as indicated in Section 2.0. Archaeological monitoring will be conducted by a professional archaeologist as defined in RCW 27.53.030(11). The professional archaeologist will be present to observe excavation activities and examine soil for potential archaeological resources. Monitoring will apply to the 820 Building demolition and associated ground-disturbing activities (Figure 2). The airport's engineer or the construction contractor will brief the archeologist on any health and safety elements under which the archaeologist will perform the monitoring. The archaeologist will wear the proper personal protective equipment (e.g., hard hat, steel toed shoes, and safety glasses) as required for project health and safety. The airport will arrange for the archaeologist to brief the construction supervisor(s) about the procedures for the event of encountering archaeological deposits and human remains described herein. Renton Municipal Airport will inform all construction contractor(s) about the archaeological monitoring procedures and protocols. The airport will authorize the archaeologist to pause ground disturbing and earth moving construction activities periodically, as needed, for a closer examination of newly exposed sediments and/or historic-period and precontact period artifacts. When on site, the Archaeologist shall check in daily with contractor and owner's representative to coordinate inspection activities. Archaeologists interacting with heavy equipment operations will comply with the following rules of engagement: a. Must wear high-visibility protective vests and proper personal protective equipment when in work areas with any operating equipment. b. No standing or working in the equipment operator's blind spots. c. May only enter the work area of any operating equipment when: 1. They have attracted the operator's attention and made eye contact. 2. The operator has idled the equipment down, placed it in neutral, grounded engaging tools, and set brakes. 3. The operator gives the ground personnel permission to approach. d. Must never walk, or position themselves between, any fixed object and operating equipment, or between two operating pieces of equipment. During construction, the archaeological monitor will examine soils, including excavations and back-dirt piles. Equipment will include, as appropriate, a shovel, trowel, and screen of 1/4-inch mesh. The archaeologist will monitor for prehistoric or historic-period artifacts or layers/lenses of organic material, or organically enriched soils that might indicate past human use. The airport will inform the construction contractor(s) about the archaeologist's monitoring work 7 and this monitoring plan. The archaeological monitor will have copy of the monitoring plan and the health and safety plan on site. The archaeologist will record the details of the activities on monitoring forms for each day on which monitoring is conducted. Activities recorded will include descriptions ofthe construction area, excavation methods, cultural materials, soil profiles, sketches, and photographs. The archaeological monitor will submit a Daily Monitoring Report to the Airport Engineer at the Renton Municipal Airport. When monitoring work has been completed, the archaeologist will prepare a final monitoring report discussing the methods and results of the work. The report will be submitted to the consulting parties. State of Washington Archaeological Site inventory Forms or Archaeological Isolate Forms will be included as necessary. These documents are confidential and exempt from disclosure under Washington law, RCW 27.53.070 and RCW 42.56.300. 8 """,, ,'" l'~,t'''_'''~f. T'''''~', ,_(,'1_0, I"r'~ ""', M ~ r"'"'''I_''''' ~,,,,~,,", ,N, 'GO, _I~ '''"''"'' '"~" ,'~, I',,, ,_ -C',","" lUU -1 i'JO DRS ~'_"_' 820 BUILDING f-;'Erno, I_lUi', _W~"_ ';1i-'[')V1 2j.J =UIL __ )I'K~ -,":-:M0L 1101'J -'h'I),I::':-: r.:,r'Jr.::; C"";lij,,Jl, ,;,,:,>mv,~',-'r'J Figure 2. Aerial of the 820 Building and the area to be monitored. 9 4.0 PROTOCOL FOR INADVERTENT DISCOVERY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Potentially significant archaeological materials have been identified in the vicinity and may be present within the Project area. Types of archaeological materials that may be encountered could include, but are not limited to: flaked stone tools and lithic debitage, charcoal-rich sediments, fire-modified rock, concentrations of shell or faunal remains, organic materials (basketry, wooden posts, bone and wooden artifacts), and concentrations of historic-period bottles, ceramics, and cans. This section identifies the key responsibilities in the event of a discovery of an item of potential cultural significance during the Project. In the unanticipated event of a discovery, the following steps shall be taken: Step 1. Stop Work and Protect the Discovery Site. If any agency employee, contractor, or subcontractor believes that he or she has uncovered any cultural resources, all work within a minimum of 50 feet of the discovery ("discovery site") shall be stopped to provide for its security, protection, and integrity. The discovery site shall be secured. Vehicles, equipment, and unauthorized personnel will not be permitted to traverse the discovery site. Step 2. Notify Project Management. The individual making the discovery shall immediately contact the Airport Engineer and notify him or her of the discovery site. If the Airport Engineer is not immediately available, then the Airport Manager shall be contacted. Step 3. Notify Project Archaeologist. Immediately following the work stoppage and notification to Project Management, the Project Archaeologist, if not already present at the site, shall be contacted. Step 4. Assess Find. The Project Archaeologist shall be qualified as a professional archaeologist under the RCW 27.53.030(11), and as such, is qualified to examine the find to determine if it is an archaeological site. If the find is confirmed to be an archaeological site and the archaeological deposits cannot be avoided, evaluation and testing to determine the nature of the cultural resource may be required. Work will be suspended in that area, and site testing will not take place without a permit from DAHP (RCW 27.53). Any type of testing or mitigation will depend upon the nature ofthe resource and would be developed as part of the DAHP permit. If archaeological resources are identified during monitoring, all work must cease in the area and the area protected until a permit from DAHP can be applied for and issued. Step 5. Notify Additional Parties. If the discovery is determined by the Project Archaeologist to be a cultural resource, Airport Engineer will continue with notification to DAHP, and if the remains are precontact or Native America, the affected Tribes within one (1) working day. If the find may relate to human remains or funerary objects, protocol outlined in the following 10 section regarding human remains shall be enacted. Confidentiality of the find shall be maintained by Renton Municipal Airport and its contractors. Step 6. Obtain Consent to Proceed with Construction. Construction work shall not recommence at the discovery site until treatment has been completed and the Tribes, DAHP, and/or jurisdictional agencies, as appropriate, have provided written or verbal consent to proceed. 11 5.0 PROTOCOL FOR INADVERTENT DISCOVERY OF HUMAN REMAINS If likely or confirmed human remains are encountered. all further ground-disturbing activities will cease immediately. Any human remains that are discovered during construction of the project will be treated with dignity and respect. The following procedures will be enacted: Step 1. Stop Work and Protect the Discovery Site. In the event that an employee. contractor, or subcontractor believes that he or she has uncovered any human skeletal remains, the Construction Supervisor will stop all work within a minimum of 50 feet of the remains to provide for their total security, protection, and integrity. Remains will immediately be covered with a tarp only, for temporary protection in place and to shield them from being photographed. The discovery location will not be left unsecured at any time, and confidentiality will be maintained by the Renton Municipal Airport and its contractors. The Project Archaeologist, if onsite at the time of the discovery, can assist with implementation of these procedures. Step 2. Notify Project Management. The Construction Supervisor will immediately contact the Renton Municipal Airport's Engineer and notify him or her of the situation. If the Airport Engineer is not immediately available, then the Airport Manager will be contacted. Step 3. Notify Law Enforcement and County Coroner's Office. If human remains are known or suspected, the Airport Engineer or his/her designee will notify the City of Renton Police Department and the King County Medical Examiner's Office in the most expeditious manner possible (RCW 27.44; 68.50; 68.60). The County Coroner will determine if the remains are human, whether the discovery site constitutes a crime scene, and will notify DAHP if the remains are non-forensic. Local law enforcement and/or the County Medical Examiner may need to access the discovery area to make any determinations and cannot be prohibited from doing so. Step 4. Notify Tribes and DAHP. Concurrently, the Airport Engineer will immediately notify the affected Tribes, DAHP, and the Project Archaeologist. Per RCW 27.44, 68.50, and 68.60, DAHP will have jurisdiction over non-forensic human remains from non-Federal and non-Tribal land and report them to cemeteries and affected Tribes. The State PhYSical Anthropologist will make a determination of whether the remains are Indian or Non-Indian and report that finding to any appropriate cemeteries and affected tribes (RCW 27.44, 68.50, 68.60). DAHP will handle all consultation with affected parties as to the preservation, excavation, and dispOSition of the remains. Step 6. Obtain Consent to Proceed with Construction. Ground-disturbing activities will not resume at the location of the discovery area and the construction buffer until the affected 12 Tribes, DAHP, and/or jurisdictional agencies, as appropriate, have provided written consent to proceed. The archaeological monitor will prepare a report describing the treatment actions as part of the Monitoring Report. 13 6.0 REFERENCES DAHP (Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation) 2013 Washington State Standards for Cultural Resource Reporting. Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. Kramer, Stephanie, Leonard A. Forsman, Dennis E. Lewarch, and Lynn L. Larson 2001 Renton High School Archaeological Resources and Traditional Cultural Places Assessment, King County, Washington. Prepared for Renton School District No. 403. Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services Limited, LAAS Technical Report #2001- 23. Gig Harbor, Washington. Lewarch, Dennis E. 2006 Renton High School Indian Site (45KI501) Archaeological data recovery, King County, Washington. Submitted to Renton School District 403. Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services, Gig Harbor. Ruby, Robert H. and John A. Brown 1992 A Guide to the Indian Tribes of the Pacific Northwest. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman and London. Revised 1992. Shong, Michael and Brandy Rinck 2011 Archaeological Assessment for Phase I of the Renton High School Field Improvement Project, King County, Washington. Prepared for Renton School District No. 403 and D.A. Hogan & Associates, Inc. Northwest Archaeological Associates Report Number WA11-015. Suttles, Wayne and Barbara Lane 1990 Southern Coast Salish. In, Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 7: Northwest Coast, edited by W. Suttles, pp. 485-502. Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. 14 Attachment A: Contacts for the Inadvertent Discovery of Archaeological Resources or Human Remains Name Organization Role Phone Ben Dahle Renton Airport Airport Engineer 425-430-7476 Ryan Zulauf Renton Airport Airport Manager 425-430-7471 Stephanie Butler UR5 Principal Archaeologist 503-478-2767 Andy Carpenter URS Project Manager 206-438-2153 RobWhitlam DAHP State Archaeologist 360-586-3080 Gretchen Kaehler DAHP Assistant State Archaeologist 360-586-3088 Dr. Guy Tasa DAHP State Physical Anthropologist 360-790-1633 Cecile Hanson Duwamish Tribe Tribal Chair 206-431-1582 James Rasmussen Duwamish Tribe Cultural Resources 206-431-1582 Charlotte Williams Muckleshoot Tribe Tribal Chair 253-969-3311 x 3194 Laura Murphy Muckleshoot Tribe Archaeologist 253-876-3272 Denis Lewarch Suquamish Tribe THPO 360-394-8529 Leonard Forsman Suquamish Tribe Tribal Chair 360-394-8461 Richard Haruff King County Medical Officer/Coroner 206-731-3232 Non-Emergency Contact City of Renton PD Local Law Enforcement 425-235-2121 15 Historic Inventory Report Location Field Site No. RMA·02 Historic Name: Building 820 Common Name: Building 5-14 DAHPNo. Property Address: 820 West Perimeter Rd, Renton, WA 98057 Comments: Tax No./Parcel No. 0723059007 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage 0.508 Supplemental Map(s' Township/Range/EW Section T23R05E 07 Coordinate Reference Easting: 1215457 Northing: 793761 1/4 Sec 1/41/4 Sec NW SE Projection: Washington State Plane South Datum: HARN (feet) Identification County King Quadrangle RENTON Survey Name: Building 800 and Building 820, Renton Date Recorded: 02/26/2014 Municipal Airport Field Recorder: Chris Dowell Owner's Name: City of Renton/Renton Municipal Airport Owner Address: 616 W Perimeter Road, Unit A City: Renton Classification: Building State: Washington Resource Status: Comments: Survey/Inventory SEPA Project Review Within a District? No Contributing? No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Eligibility Status: Determined Not Eligible -SHPO Determination Date: 3/13/2014 Determination Comments: 021914-21-KI determined on 3/13/2014 Monday, March 17,2014 Page 1 of 7 Zip: 98057 Historic Inventory Report Description Historic Use: Transportation -Air-Related Plan: Irregular Stories: 2 Changes to Plan: Moderate Changes to Original Cladding: Intact Changes to Other: Slight Current Use: Transportation -Air-Related Structural System: Concrete -Reinforced Concrete Changes to Interior: Extensive Changes to Windows: Intact Other (specify): A breezeway has been introduced at the south side of the building; interior partitions have been modified on the 1st and 2nd floors; power and manufacturing equipment have been removed from the building; guardrails have been added to the roof. Style: Other -Utilitarian Foundation: Concrete -Poured Narrative Study Unit Transportation Date of Construction: Cladding: Concrete Form/Type: Industrial 1963 Built Date Roof Type: Flat with Parapet Other Builder: Roof Material: Asphalt / Composition - Built Up Engineer: Austin Associates Architect: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property Is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local): No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local): No Monday, March 17, 2014 Page 2 of7 Statement of Significance: Description of Physical Appearance: Mondav, March 17, 2014 Historic Inventory Report From the 1950s to 2005, Boeing leased property within the Renton Municipal Airport in order to better serve its fleet as it neared the final stages of production. In 1963, the 820 Building was constructed to house an electronics laboratory to support its production of military aircraft for the United States Air Force. These aircraft included the Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker that was manufactured at the Renton facility. To support these endeavors, the company constructed Building 5-14 beside airport Apron "C" (now referred to as the 820 Building). Subsequent to its construction and in response to the changing production lines of the Renton Manufacturing Plants, Boeing repurposed the building to assist with the refitting of aircraft cabin doors for certain models of the Boeing 737 aircraft at a later date. When constructed in 1963, the two-story building was quickly erected using precast concrete wall panels that are often referred to as "tilt-up" walls and featured a flat roof. Concrete block was used solely on the east elevation of the building. The interior space consisted of a large open production space on the first floor accompanied by rooms for "military parts storage", "military platform bench test class", "shipping and receiving", men's room, and a boiler room. The second floor was subdivided into office space that included offices, equipment rooms, crew quarters, vendor eqUipment storage, planning offices, foreman's office, "USAF office" and a planning office. The field investigation revealed that most of the interior partitions within the building have been modified and due to the removal of interior equipment, the original and subsequent functions and use of the building are not readily apparent. The historical integrity of the 820 building has been significantly diminished since its construction in 1963. Boeing appears to have repurposed the building at least once in order to better support its manufacturing changes in the Renton Manufacturing Plant. These changes resulted in the reorganization of interior spaces on the first and second floor. When Boeing did not renew its lease with the city in 2005, all equipment once associated with the building was removed as well. With the reorganization of the interior as well as the removal of the equipment, the building's historical associations with Boeing and its Renton Manufacturing Plant are not effectively communicated. Furthermore, the building does not appear to be associated with significant historical events or people and it is not a good example of the building type. While associated with the growth and evolution of Boeing's Manufacturing Plant in the 1960s and the concomitant development of the Renton Municipal Airport, the building's lack of integrity and its inability to communicate its historical associations with these trends renders the building not eligible for the NRHP under Criteria A, B, and C. The 820 building is located near the northwest part of Renton Municipal Airport at 820 West Perimeter Road in Renton, Washington. The building is a two-story concrete panel (tilt-up) industrial building with 26,400 gross square feet of enclosed floor space. Constructed in 1963, the building exhibits a flat, asphalt -membrane covered roof and is distinguished by the minimal number of window and door openings. Four fixed, double pane glass windows set in aluminum frames are situated on the first floor of the east elevation. Three metal doors with single lights are asymmetrically positioned between the two sets of two windows. Roll-top service garage entries are situated on the west side of the building on both the first and second floors. The rear of the building features a one-story extension that contains a boiler room and transformer. The 820 Building is connected to the 800 Building via a corrugated metal roof. The breezeway can be accessed via either of the buildings or from the east and west. The second floor exhibits two sets of three aluminum-clad, dOUble-pane windows. Each set of windows is accompanied by a single metal door that allows entry on to the first floor roof. Page 3 of7 Major Bibliographic References: Monday, March 17, 2014 Historic Inventory Report Most of the exterior walls are 5-1/2" thick concrete. The walls were constructed using the "tilt-up" process wherein the concrete for the walls is cast flat, on top of the building floor slab, and is then lifted into place after the concrete has set. The exterior ofthe concrete panels are "smooth-troweled" concrete with paint finish. The interior surfaces of the exterior walls are finished with gypsum wall board (GWB) attached to the concrete panels with metal furring channels. There is no insulation in the wall assembly. One exterior wall (second floor East facing) is made of concrete block. This wall has paint finish inside and outside with no interior GWB finish. In a number of locations the exterior walls show signs of Significant water damage. Galvanized metal sheeting (approximately 5' square) interrupts the concrete wall surface on the north side ofthe building. This is a sheet metal closure covering an opening in the concrete wall. The purpose of the opening is uncertain, but may have been related to ductwork or production equipment which has subsequently been removed. On the interior, this opening is now obscyred by a pair of metal doors. The interior of the building consists of a large, production-like room on the first floor that rests directly on the original concrete slab. A series of support columns interrupt the space at regular intervals. The second floor exhibits several office spaces as well as an additional larger production-like room. Special electrical power systems were originally included to support production activities. Power panels for 400hz and 28 volt panels remain but the generators/converters for special power are no longer in the building. Otherwise the building is equipped with 120/208 panels throughout. Lighting at the first floor is provided with ceiling-mounted fluorescent fixtures arranged in continuous rows. Similar lighting is provided in some areas of 2nd floor, but for the most part the 2nd floor is lit with 2' x 4' fluorescent fixtures in a suspended ceiling grid system. Since originally constructed, the following alterations to the 820 Building have occurred: • A breezeway has been introduced at the south side of the building. • Minor partitioning changes have occurred at the first floor. • Substantial changes to partitioning and interior finishes have occurred at the second floor • Vinyl Asbestos Tile has been changed in several locations at the first floor. • Special power and manufacturing equipment that required and served 400hz and 28v power has been removed. • Guardrails have been added to the roof. Renton Municipal Airport. Engineering Department. Original Plans and Drawings for Building 5-14, Electronics Building. Accessed February 26, 2014. Sloan, Chris. "A Historical Look at Boeing's 737 Factory in Renton." Http://www.airlinereporter.com/20B/07 /a n-h istorical-look-at-boeings-73 7 -factory-i n-renton/. Accessed March 12, 2014. Page 4 of 7 Historic Inventory Report Photos Building 820, east elevation, looking west. 2014 Building 820, west and north elevations, looking southeast. 2014 Building 820, west and south elevations, looking northeast. 2014 Building 820, view of breezeway interior, looking east. 2014 Monday, March 17, 2014 Page 5 of 7 Historic Inventory Report Building 820, first floor interior view, looking northwest. 2014 Building 820, site plan. Note presence of Building 800. 1963 -:" ... . >------. Monday, March 17.2014 Building 820, second floor interior view, looking northwest. 2014 Building 820, first floor plan. 1963 Page 6 of 7 .~~~~~&:: Historic Inventory Report Building 820, 2nd floor plan. 1963 Monday, March 17. 2014 Page 7 of 7 Historic Inventory Report location Field Site No. RMA-03 Historic Name: Building 800 Common Name: Building 5-60 Property Address: 800 W Perimeter Rd, Renton, WA 98057 Comments: Tax No./Parcel No. 0723059007 Plal/Block/lol Acreage 0.508 Supplemental Map(s) Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/41/4 Sec T23R05E 07 Coordinate Reference Easting: 1215496 Northing: 793709 Projection: Washington State Plane South Datum: HARN (feet) Identification DAHPNo. County King Quadrangle RENTON Survey Name: Building 800 and Building 820, Renton Date Recorded: 02/26/2014 Municipal Airport Field Recorder: Chris Dowell Owner's Name: City of Renton/Renton Municipal Airport Owner Address: 616 W Perimeter Road, Unit A City: Renton Classification: Building State: Washington Resource Status: Comments: Survey/Inventory SEPA Project Review Within a District? No Contributing? No National Register: local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Eligibility Stalus: Determined Not Eligible -SHPO Determination Date: 3/13/2014 Determination Comments: 021914-21-KI determined on 3/13/2014 Monday, March 17, 2014 Page 1 of6 Zip: 98057 DEPARl ..... ENT Of ARCHA~(XOC;'( & ~""'''H "",', , """"," H.ro,;~p'ES"'V~11ON Historic Inventory Report Description Historic Use: Transportation -Air-Related Plan: Irregular Changes to Plan: Slight Stories: 1 Changes to Original Cladding: Intact Changes to Other: Intact Current Use: Transportation -Air-Related Structural System: Post and Beam Changes to Interior: Slight Changes to Windows: Intact Other (specify): Interior partitions appear to have been installed after original construction. Style: Other -Utilitarian Foundation: Concrete -Poured Narrative Study Unit Transportation Date of Construction: Cladding: Metal -Corrugated Form/Type: Other 1955 Built Date Roof Type: Gable Other Aeronautics Builder: Unknown Engineer: Unknown Architect: Unknown Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local): No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local): No Monday, March 17,1014 Page 2 of 6 Roof Material: Metal -Standing Seam Statement of Significance: Description of Physical Appearance: Major Bibliographic References: Monday, March 17,2014 Historic Inventory Report From the 1950s to 2005, Boeing leased property within the Renton Municipal Airport in order to better serve its fleet as it neared the final stages of production. While no plans or records have been found to pinpoint the date of the 800 Building, original plans for the 820 Building confirm Building 800's presence on site in 1953. According to the current Renton Airport Director, Ryan Zulauf, the hangar was erected by the (James L.) Robertson Aircraft Corporation to make short takeoff and/or landing kits for aircraft. It was subsequently purchased by Boeing for storage related to the 737 refurbishment to add an additional door for aircraft used in European markets. Since its release by Boeing in 2005, the hangar appears to have supported the maintenance and storage of smaller commercial aircraft and helicopters. Originally called Building 5-50, the building was situated immediately south of Building 5-14 beside airport Apron "C". The building's construction reflects commonly used pre-engineered building components and plans. Using metal I-beams for vertical structural supports, the building also exhibits large steel beams along with more slender purl ins to carry the loads necessitated by the large open spaces the building encloses. It appears that building has served as a small aircraft and helicopter maintenance and storage building over time. It does not appear related to Boeing's large aircraft manufacturing plant and facility although it may have provided ancillary space to support Boeing's operations. While the building appears to maintain its historical integrity, the hangar does not appear significant as it does not convey its associations with significant events or people and it appears to be a common example of a pre-engineered structure. Even though the building was situated within the Boeing Lease Area of the Renton Municipal Airport, it remains unclear what function it served within Boeing's operations. So, while associated with the growth and evolution of Boeing's Manufacturing Plant in the 1950s and the concomitant development of the Renton Municipal Airport, the building's inability to communicate its historical associations with these trends renders the building not eligible for the NRHP under Criteria A, B and C. The 800 building is located near the northwest part of Renton Municipal Airport at 800 West Perimeter Road in Renton, Washington. The building (also known at the 5-60 Building) is a one story, small aircraft hangar located to the south of the 820 Building. The building, constructed in the late 19505, is entirely clad with raised seam metal and features a moderately pitched, gable roof sheathed with raised seam metal. The front or east of the building exhibits a single door and a series of sliding windows that provide light to an office space. The elevation also features a folding metal door, as well as a larger set of sliding, corrugated metal doors for aircraft. The remaining elevations exhibit, single, metal door entries but no windows with the exception of the south elevation that contains some additional double-pane fixed windows near the southeastern corner of the building. The interior consists of three bays. The southernmost bay has largely been enclosed and is used for storage and mechanical equipment. The rear (west) part of the bay remains open. The central and north bays consist of open work spaces. The bays are defined by steel I-beam posts that support longitudinal steel trusses that conform to the gable roof line. Transverse metal purlins run east -west. The space between the purlins is covered with insulation. A raised office space with windows facing the work space is situated at the west end of the work space and is accessed via a single set of metal stairs with a handrail. Renton Muncipal Airport. Engineering Department. Original Plans and Drawings for Building 820, Electronics Building. Accessed February 26, 2014. Sloan, Chris. lIA Historical Look at Boeing's 737 Factory in Renton." http://www.airlinereporter.com/2013/07 /an-historical-I oak-at -boeings-73 7 -factory-i n-renton/. Accessed March 12, 2014. Email Communication between Ben Dahle, Renton Airport Engineer and Ryan Zulauf, Renton Airport Director March 11, 2014. "Robertson Aircraft Corporation." http://www.aerofiles.com/_ro.html. Accessed March 12, 2014. Page 3 of6 Historic Inventory Report Monday, March 17, 2014 Page 4 of6 Historic Inventory Report Photos Building 800, east elevation, looking west. 2014 Building 800, west and north elevations, looking southeast. 2014 Building 800, interior, looking west. 2014 Building 800, interior detail, looking west. 2014 Monday, March 17, 2014 Page 5 of6 Historic Inventory Report Building 800, west and south elevations, looking northeast. 2014 Monday, March 17.2014 Page 6 of 6 STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on February 28, 2014. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $115.50. .//, A mJ;d:i't /// ,l'(ti.£-L t1nda M. Mills Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter Subscribed and sworn to me this 28th day of February, 2014. ~ •• < 17 (), • a UUu-l.''CJtL{·'tn'-£,,,- a leen C. Sherman, Notary Pubhc for the State of Wash mgt on, Residing in Buckley, Washington "'" '." '-.'" .. '", .. :' . .-;;~; "':~> \;2i"~';'~.t~~J , ,\\\\\\\\.\. .... ",,-...' NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determi- nation of Non Significance Miti4 gated (lJNS M) for the following project under the authority of the Renton municipal code. Renton Airport Runway Blast Wall Replacement & 820 Building Demolition LUAI4000133 Location: 616 W Perimeter Rd. Applicant proposes to demolish the existing 30,000 sf 820 Building and demolition and replacement of the existing 22 foot high blast wall at the Renton Municipal Airport. Demolition of the the two pro· jeets would result in approxi· mately 13,000 cy grading. The 22 f1. high blast wall would be replaced with a new blast wall, approximately 12.75 ft. in height constructed in the vicinity of the new wall. After demolition of the 820 building the site would be graded flat and prepared for potential future developmenl, which may require additional SEPA re· view. The site is zoned 1M, and is located within the 500 year flood hazard area. There is a landslide hazard area south of the existing blast wall and a seismic area in the vicinity. Appeals of the DNS M must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on March 14, 2014. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner elo City Clerk, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renkln, WA 98057. Appeals to the Hearing Examiner are governed by RMC 4 8 110 and more infonnation may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, 425 430 6510. Published in the Renton Reporter on February 28, 2014. #994422. OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (ON5-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS Of AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION P1IOJECT NAMfi PROJ~crNUMBER: LOCATION: Renton AI",o"" Runwar DI .. t Will R.pl.""mont 10 820 Bundu,1 Demolition LUA14-00B3 616 W. P.rlmeter Road DESaiPTION: Appllc.nt propoOlOt t<) demollth tho .."j'Clne 30,000 ., 810 8ulJdlne and on .~l.tlnl U·lDOC hleh blauwallat the Renton Munldp.1 Airport. TM project .... Is localtd nonh orw Perimeter Rd 3nd Is ,enerally-n".-m."'1 orlh. lnt1!tse<llon of Airport W3r and R.lnler Awe N. n.. 810 Bulldlne I, louted .t 120 W Perimeter Rd, ""uth of t~e entranOil ttl the olrpon 'rom R.IIII .... AYe N IA.PN 0123OS9OO1). The demolition would ......,It in 111. ,"""",",I 01 .pproxlm311!'ly-aoo q 01 toncret~, 3.ph.:olt, and nEI"" b •• 8jl<lund.tl"" b«Idl"ll rock.. Gr;ldln, would occur /oUowin, demolill ..... nd wouk! result In ftUln8 the lite ol-grade with opprox. 1,400 ton. ofWSDOf cruoh.d suriadre bite COUI'S •• TIle e.lstlne ll-/ollt hfih blatt Willi Is I"""",d ot the south end 01 the _1",Drt [616 W P.rlmllier Road, APN D113OS!1OO7[. Re8radl"ll Df the Infi..ld and ,ross ... '" would be requlr<!d for the project. In addition. limited I'3dlnl .. ould occur within the blaol I"'d p.avement to p .... vld ...... ltlVlI d .. I ..... wh~e ~rilli the end of the .."I,tlnl grade odlnent to tin! ne", bI"'l ",all In ord~r to eMU'" that I"" ","W blast _" Js IM!low tho Futu .. Non- r..dslon Appro~ch SUrface. A new bl:ul wall, ;>J>proxlmotely 12.75 Int In hel",t ",,,,,,Id 1M! comtructed In the v\(Infty of the n@w_ft. Appro.lmately 500 tubl, yard. of ~I! would 1M! nHeed fDr the proj.ct, .... d would be provide from .pproved !>arrow .""r"' .... TIle $lte!, lOne 1M, ond is !ocated within the 500-y<!ar/lood "".,.rd "'".". Tho ... Is a lond.lld. "" •• rd .reo touih ofth •• olstlre bl<lstwal! and 3 .el""kartla In tho: vicinity. THE an-OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE IERC} HAS DETERMINED ~AT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADveRSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeal, of th@ ~nvl .... nmental determination mu.t be filed In writing on 0<" before S:OO p.m. on March 11, 2014, tOlilether with the r.qulred fee With: Hurlng Eumlner, CltV of R~nton, 1055 Soulh Grady War, Renton, WA 9B057. Appeals 10 Ihe Examiner are IilOverned by City of RMe 4-S_110 and Information r"l.rdlng the appul proceu maV btl obtained from the Renton CIty Cleric', Office, (4251 00--6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION 15 APPEALED, A PUBU( HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. "",6",,,,,",,,, '''COMMUNlrt & CERTIFICATION hereby certify that~ copies of the above document were posted in , conspicuous places or nearby t~rrib:d propertyon _ _ Date: 2./ Z(P /I'{ Signed~ tlCLl1.f:lU)c<-VcJ?L STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that V" 0 ,. "S',;;" 1>0 I \0« signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Nota ry (Pri nt) :_---'Iio=-"w..1j-"r-----I1?..J.Q-lz:li;lW)!v):::,' .f..<L ____ _ My appointment expires: __ ---+-tt.Lli."'-j,j~1 ""<£>---Lt-_-"0l~1Ir' ---t..dOloJ· ..,LlL3-J-__ ", ... , Denis Law Mayor February 27, 2014 Community and Economic Development Department C. E. "Chip"Vincent, Administrator Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPAl THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERe) on February 24, 2014: SEPA DETERMINATION: PROJECT NAME: Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated (DNSM) Renton Airport Runway Blast Wall Replacement & 820 Building Demo PROJECT NUMBER: LUA14-000133 Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before S:OO p.m. on March 14, 2014, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7286. For the Environmental Review Committee, Vanessa Dolbee Current Planning Manager Enclosure cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Boyd Powers, Department of Natural Resources Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, NW Region larry Fisher, WDFW Duwamish Tribal Office US Army Corp. of Engineers Renton City Hall. 1055 South GradyWay. Renton/Washington 98057 • rentonwa,gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNSM) MITIGATION MEASURES AND ADVISORY NOTES PROJECT NUMBER: LUAI4-000133 APPLICANT: Ben Dahle, Renton Municipal Airport, City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Renton Airport Runway Blast Wall Replacement & 820 Building Demo PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant proposes to demolish the existing 30,000 sf 820 Building and demolition and replacement of the existing 22-foot high blast wall at the Renton Municipal Airport. Demolition of the the two projects would result in approximately 13,000 cy grading. The 22 ft. high blast wall would be replaced with a new blast wall, approximately 12.7S ft. in height constructed in the vicinity of the new wall. After demolition of the 820 building the site would be graded flat and prepared for potential future development, which may require additional SEPA review. The site is zoned 1M, and is located within the SOO-year flood hazard area. There is a landslide hazard area south ofthe existing blast wall and a seismic area in the vicinity. PROJECT LOCATION: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 616 W. Perimeter Road The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1. An architectural historian shall conduct a review of the 820 building for historical significance and complete a Determination of Eligibility prior to any ground disturbing activity for the demolition. The evaluation shall be provided to the Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation. 2. The 820 Building demolition and Blast Wall reconstruction and archaeologies shall be on-site during all ground disturbing activities for archaeological monitoring. A memorandum shall be prepared for both sites by the archaeologist and copes of each memorandum shall be submitted to the Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation, concerned Tribes and the Current Planning Project Manager. 3. An architectural historian shall conduct a review of the 820 building for historical significance and complete a Determination of Eligibility prior to any ground disturbing activity for the demolition. The evaluation shall be provided to the Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation. 4. The 820 Building demolition and Blast Wall reconstruction and archaeologies shall be on- site during all ground disturbing activities for archaeological monitoring. A memorandum shall be prepared for both sites by the archaeologist and copes of each memorandum shall be submitted to the Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation, concerned Tribes and the Current Planning Project Manager. ADIVISORY NOTES: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2Iimit, haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 2. Commercial, multi·family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion ofthe site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 4. A National Permit Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required when more than one acre is being cleared. Plan Review 1. Erosion control shall comply with the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual. 2. Drainage review is not triggered by this project. 3. Cut and cap permits for utilities will be required as part ofthe demolition permit. ERe Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 2 of 2 Denis Law Mayor February 27, 2014 Ben Dahle Renton Municipal Airport 616 W Perimeter Road Unit A Renton, WA 98057 0(1 ~':§IDill Department of Community and Economic Development C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Renton Airport Runway Blast Wall Replacement & 820 Building Demo LUA14-000133 Dear Mr. Dahle: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERe) to advise you thatthey have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a threshold Determination qf Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report, for a list of the Mitigation MeasurE's. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on March 14, 2014, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, lOSS South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) 430~6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. If you have any further questions, please call me at (425) 430-7286. For the Environmental Review Committee, Vanessa Dolbee Current Planning Manager Enclosure Renton City Hall .1055 South Grady Way. Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL {SEPAl DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) PROJECT NUMBER: LUA14-000133 APPLICANT: Ben Dahle, Renton Municipal Airport, City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Renton Airport Runway Blast Wall Replacement & 820 Building Demo PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant proposes to demolish the existing 30,000 sf 820 Building and an existing 22-foot high blast wall at the Renton Municipal Airport. The project area is located north of W Perimeter Rd and is generally northeast of the intersection of Airport Way and Rainier Ave N. The 820 Building is located at 820 W Perimeter Rd, south of the entrance to the airport from Rainier Ave N (APN 0723059007). The demolition would result in the removal of approximately 800 cy of concrete, asphalt, and native base/foundation bedding rock. Grading would occur following demolition and would result in filling the site at- grade with approx. 1,400 tons of WSDOT crushed surfacing base course. The existing 22-foot high blast wall is located at the south end of the airport (616 W Perimeter Road, APN 0723059007). Regrading of the infield and grass areas would be required for the project. In addition, limited grading would occur within the blast pad pavement to provide positive drainage while lowering the end of the existing grade adjacent to the new blast wall in order to ensure that the new blast wall is below the Future Non- Precision Approach Surface. A new blast wall, approximately 12.75 feet in height would be constructed in the vicinity of the new wall. Approximately 500 cubic yards of fill would be needed for the project, and would be provided from approved borrow sources. The site is zoned 1M, and is located within the SOD-year flood hazard area. There is a landslide hazard area south of the existing blast wall and a seismic area in the vicinity. PROJECT LOCATION: 616 W. Perimeter Road LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-9-070D Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on March 14, 2014. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: February 28, 2014 DATE OF DECISION: 2/24/2014 SIGNATURES: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVElOPMENT -- Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Community Services Department Date Date Mar~ Peterson, Administrator Fire & Emergency Services c..£.. C.E. "Chip" Vinc t, Administrator Department of Community & Economic Development .2h~r 7 Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNI. { AND ECONOMIC DEVElOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ERC MEETING DATE: Project Name: Project Number: Project Manager: Owner: Applicant/Contact: Project Location: Project Summary: Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Area: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: February 24, 2002 Runway Blast Wall Replacement Project and 820 Building Demolition Project LUA14-000133, ECF Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Ben Dahle, Renton Municipal Airport, 616 West Perimeter Road, Renton, WA 98057 Blast Wall: 616 W Perimeter Rd. 820 Demolition: 820 W Perimeter Rd. Applicant proposes to demolish the existing 30,000 sf 820 Building and demolition and replacement of the existing 22-foot high blast wall at the Renton Municipal Airport. Demolition of the the two projects would result in approximately 13,000 cy grading. The 22 ft. high blast wall would be replaced with a new blast wall, approximately 12.75 ft. in height constructed in the vicinity of the new wall. After demolition of the 820 building the site would be graded flat and prepared for potential future development, which may require additional SEPA review. The site is zoned 1M, and is located within the SOD-year flood hazard area. There is a landslide hazard area south of the existing blast wall and a seismic area in the vicinity. 30,000 SF Blast Wall: 116,000 SF 820 Demo: 30,000 SF Proposed New Bldg. Areo (footprint): Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): Total Building Area GSF: None None N/A Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS -MI. Project Location Map ERe Report.docx City of Renton Department of Community & L-. omic Development RUNWAY BLAST WALL REPLACEMENT PROJEIT ANO 820 BUILDING DEMOLITION PROJEIT Report of February 24, 2002 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION I BACKGROUND _nvironmental Review Committee Report WA14-000133, ECF Page 2 of 5 The applicant has requested SEPA Environmental Review to demolish the existing 30,000 sf 820 Building and demolish and replace the existing 22-foot high blast wall at the Renton Municipal Airport. The project area is located north of W Perimeter Rd and is generally northeast of the intersection of Airport Way and Rainier Ave N (Exhibit 1). The 820 Building is located at 820 W Perimeter Rd, south of the entrance to the airport from Rainier Ave N (APN 0723059007). The existing 820 building is 30,000 SF in size. The demolition would result in the removal of approximately 800 cy of concrete, asphalt, and native base/foundation bedding rock. Grading would occur following demolition and would result in filling the site at-grade with approx. 1,400 tons of WSDOT crushed surfacing base course. The area would be graded flat and prepared with a sub-grade for the potential future development. At this time, it is unknown what would be developed in this area, additional SEPA review may be required for future development of the site. The existing 22-foot high blast wall is located at the south end of the airport (616 W Perimeter Road, APN 0723059007). Regrading of the infield and grass areas would be required for the project. In addition, limited grading would occur within the blast pad pavement to provide positive drainage while lowering the end of the existing grade adjacent to the new blast wall in order to ensure that the new blast wall is below the Future Non-Precision Approach Surface. A new blast wall, approximately 12.75 feet in height would be constructed in the vicinity of the new wall. Approximately 500 cubic yards of fill would be needed for the project, and would be provided from approved borrow sources. The proposed project would not change access to the Renton Municipal Airport and/or change any airplane use of the Airport's runway. The project is located in the Airport Influence Area, Protection Zone 1, Runway Protection Zone. All portions of the project would be required to comply with the Federal Aviation Regulations Part 77 Objects affecting navigable airspace. The applicant has indicated no trees would be removed from the project site and neither the 820 demolition and/or the blast would is within 200 feet of the Cedar River and Lake Washington (both which boarder the Airport). The site is zoned 1M, and is located within the 500-year flood hazard area. There is a landslide hazard area south of the existing blast wall and a seismic area in the vicinity of the project. I PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period. ERe Report.docx City of Renton Deportment of Communit, _ Economic Development Environ."entol Review Committee Report RUNWAY BLAST WALL REPLACEMENT PROJECT AND 820 BUILDING DEMOLITION PROJECT WA14-000133, ECF Report of February 24, 2002 Page 3 of 5 B. Mitigation Measures 1. An architectural historian shall conduct a review of the 820 building for historical significance and complete a Determination of Eligibility prior to any ground disturbing activity for the demolition. The evaluation shall be provided to the Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation. 2. The 820 Building demolition and Blast Wall reconstruction and archaeologies shall be on-site during all ground disturbing activities for archaeological monitoring. A memorandum shall be prepared for both sites by the archaeologist and copes of each memorandum shall be submitted to the Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation, concerned Tribes and the Current Planning Project Manager. C. Exhibits Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3: Exhibit 4: Vicinity Map Blast Wall Replacement Site Plan 820 Building Demo Site Plan Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation letter D. Environmentallmpacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1. Earth Impacts: The project site is generally flat for both the blast wall and the 820 demolition. The steepest slope in the project site is associated with the berm located west ofthe existing blast wall between West Perimeter Road and Airport Way, which is approximately 15 -25 percent. According to the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the site is underlain by Urban Land. Re-grading of the infield and grass area would be needed for the blast wall replacement project. In addition, limited grading would occur within the blast pad pavement to provide positive drainage while lowering the end of the existing grade adjacent to the new blast wall to ensure that the new blast wall is below the future Non-Precision Approach Surface. Approximately 500 cubic yards of fill would be needed for the project. The 820 demotion would result in 800 cubic yards of concrete, asphalt, and native base/foundation bedding rock to be removed for the demolition. Upon completion of the demolition the site would be leveled and fill would be placed to prepare for future development. All projects would occur in areas of existing impervious surfaces and there would be no net increase in impervious surface after both projects. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation needed Nexus: N/A 2. Environmental Health a. Environmental Health Hazards ERC Report.docx City of Renton Department of Community & omic Development RUNWAY BlAST WAll REPLACEMENT PROJECT AND 820 BUILDING DEMOLITION PROJECT Report of February 24, 2002 _nvironmental Review Committee Report WA14-000133, ECF Page40fS Impacts: The 820 Building is known to contain asbestos, heavy metals, lead, mercury, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The workers' health will be protected during demolition activities by applicable regulations regarding removal of hazardous materials from the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Washington State Department of Ecology. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation needed Nexus: N/A b. Noise Impacts: Temporary short-term notices impacts are anticipated related to the construction activities. Based on the provided construction mitigation description, the 820 demolition is anticipated to take 90 working days and the wall reconstruction is proposed to occur between April of 2014 and June of 2014. The applicant has indicated construction would occur during daylight hours or between 7:00 am and 10:00 pm. Due to the existing ambient noise which is characterized of an operating airport, it is not anticipated that the proposed temporary construction noise would be noticeable beyond regular operations at the Airport. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation needed Nexus: N/A 3. Historic and Cultural Preservation Impacts: A letter was received from the Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation (DAHP) dated February 19, 2014. Based on this letter both the blast wall and the 820 building are in an area with high potential for archaeological resources. The blast wall is adjacent to the historic confluence of the Black and Cedar Rivers and is approximately 800 feet from a precontact archaeological site situated on a similar land form. The 820 building has a high probability to contain precontact resources however, the building itself is not a historic building. Finally, DAHP requests a profeSSional archaeological survey of both the blast wall replaced and the 820 building demolition. Based on the probability of cultural resources in the vicinity of the project and the comments received from DAHP, staff recommends two mitigation measures that would require an archaeologist on side during ground disturbing activities and the applicant complete a review to determine if the 820 building is of historic significance. Mitigation Measures: 1. An architectural historian shall conduct a review of the 820 building for historical Significance and complete a Determination of Eligibility prior to any ground disturbing activity for the demolition. The evaluation shall be provided to the Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation. 2. The 820 Building demolition and Blast Wall reconstruction and archaeologies shall be on- site during all ground disturbing activities for archaeological monitoring. A memorandum shall be prepared for both sites by the archaeologist and copes of each memorandum shall be submitted to the Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation, concerned Tribes and the Current Planning Project Manager. Nexus: SEPA ERe Report.docx City of Renton Department of Communit, _ Economic Development Environ. "ental Review Committee Report RUNWAY BLAST WALL REPLACEMENT PROJECT AND 820 BUILDING DEMOLITION PROJECT WA14-000133, ECF Report of February 24, 2002 Page 5 of 5 E. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant." ,/ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report. The Environmental Determination decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing together with the required fee to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, on or before 5:00 p.m. on March 14, 2014. RMC 4·8-110 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner and additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall-i h Floor, (425) 430-6510. ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limit, haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 2. Commercial, multi·family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 4. A National Permit Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required when more than one acre is being cleared. Plan Review 1. Erosion control shall comply with the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual. 2. Drainage review is not triggered by this project. 3. Cut and cap permits for utilities will be required as part of the demolition permit. ERe Report.docx Renton Lake Washington '''I Source: USGS 7.S-minufe topographic quadrangles: Remon. Washington, 2011; and Mercer Is/and, Washington, 2017 o Job No. 33764311 URS 2,000 Scale in Feet 4,000 Figure 1 Vicinity Map Blast Wall Replacement Project and 820 Building Demolition Project Renton Municipal Airport ... , '-, \ I i I I ' , ! ! I j , I I ' I ' i , \ \ '. w \ r I III» I! I I !~l! ! i / I I I , II ----01 I , I , I r ----- .~ I I I I ! I I I I I I ~-~ _ .... _"" .... ' o w 3 -O~ ~.L3NIH3d --- o I' NOlN3lJ dO AlIO NVld lOlliNO:) lN3NIa3S ~ NOISO~3 AllV'llOd1'i3.l o if) .~ o RANIER/WEN M I- M CO M ::c >< LLI '" o Of ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION February 19, 2014 Mr. Gerald Wasser Associate Planner City of Renton "" ~' . 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W A 98057 -,~,-... -. ----------------------- In future correspondence please refer to: Log: 021914-21-Kl Altyson BrooKs Ph.D., Director State Historic Preservation Officer Property: Runway Blast Wall Replacement Project and 820 Building Demolition Project Re: Archaeology -Archaeological survey of blast waIl replacement requested when working in native soils, Survey for 820 building replacement project requested, More information requested Dear Mr. Wasser: We have reviewed the materials forwarded to our office for the proposed project referenced above. The area has a high the potential for archaeological resources. Also the blast wall replacement area is adjacent to the historic confluence of the Black and Cedar Rivers and is approximately 800 feet from a precontact archaeological site situated on a similar landforro. Therefore, we request professional archaeological survey of both the blast wall replacement and the 820 building replacement. We request that these surveys be forwarded to DAHP and the interested Tribes for review prior to ground disturbing activities. We also recommend consultation with the concerned Tribes' cultural committees and staff regarding cultural resource issues. We are confused as to why the proponent proposes to conduct a Determination of Eligibility and/or prepare an historic property inventory forro for the 820 building when the checklist clearly states that there are not object of historic interest on the site per the DAHP database. The survey for the 820 building demolition is requested based on the high probability for the area to contain precontact resources since we do not have information that the building is historic. . State of Washington· Department 01 Archaealogy & Historic PreservaHon P.O. Box 48343 • Olympia. Washington 98504-8343· (360) 586-3065 www.dahp.wa.gov Thank you for the opportunity to review this project and we look forward to receiving the survey report. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (360) 586-3088 or Gretchen.Kaehler@dahp.wa.gov. Sincerely, Gretchen Kaehler Local Governments Archaeologist (360) 586-3088 gretchen.kaehler@dahp.wa.gov cc. Laura Murphy, Archaeologist, Muckleshoot Tribe Cecile Hanson, Chair, Duwamish Tribe Denis Lewarch, TIIPO, Suquamish Tribe Phil LeTourneau, Archaeologist, King County Historic Preservation Russell Holter, Compliance, DAHP 2 DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION February 19,2014 Mr. Gerald Wasser Associate Planner City of Renton lOSS South Grady Way Renton, W A 98057 c------- In future correspondence please refer to: Log: 021914-21-Kl Allyson Brooks Ph.D., Director State Historic Preservation Officer --------------~ Property: Runway Blast Wall Replacement Project and 820 Building Demolition Project Re: Archaeology -Archaeological survey of blast waIl replacement requested when working in native soils, Survey for 820 building replacement project requested, More information requested Dear Mr. Wasser: We have reviewed the materials forwarded to our office for the proposed project referenced above. The area has a high the potential for archaeological resources. Also the blast wall replacement area is adjacent to the historic confluence of the Black and Cedar Rivers and is approximately 800 feet from a precontact archaeological site situated on a similar landform. Therefore, we request professional archaeological survey of both the blast wall replacement and the 820 building replacement. We request that these surveys be forwarded to DAHP and the interested Tribes for review prior to ground disturbing activities. We also recommend consultation with the concerned Tribes' cultural committees and staff regarding cultural resource issues. We are confused as to why the proponent proposes to conduct a Determination of Eligibility and/or prepare an historic property inventory form for the 820 building when the checklist clearly states that there are not object of historic interest on the site per the DAHP database. The survey for the 820 building demolition is requested based on the high probability for the area to contain precontact resources since we do not have information that the building is historic. . State of Washington· Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation P.O. Box 48343' Olympia. Washington 98504-8343' (360) 586-3065 www.dahp.wa,gov • Thank you for the opportunity to review this project and we look forward to receiving the survey report. Should you have any questions, please feel frce to contact me at (360) 586-3088 or Gretchen.Kaehler@dahp.wa.gov. Sincerely, Gretchen Kaehler Local Governments Archaeologist (360) 586-3088 gretchen.kaehler@dahp.wa.gov cc. Laura Murphy, Archaeologist, Muckleshoot Tribe Cecile Hanson, Chair, Duwamish Tribe Denis Lewarch, THPO, Suquamish Tribe Phil LeTourneau, Archaeologist, King County Historic Preservation Russell Holter, Compliance, DAHP 2 .on Department of Community & Economic De.,lopment City ( ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~ wes APPLICATION NO: LUA13-000133, ECF APPLICANT: Ben Dahle PROJECT TITLE: Runway Blast Wall Replacement Project & 820 Building Demo SITE AREA: 146,000 square feet LOCATION: 616 & 820 West Perimeter Road COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 19, 2014 DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 5, 2014 PROJECT MANAGER: Jerry Wasser PROJECT REVIEWER: Jan lilian ::" ~' :2 " ::1 ~ -(, ~, :::u EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): (j) Tn Fl Z ;2' 0 PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) n z ~~ "~,' ':r::: rTf ,-, --iT, "" <: ;-n '"" "I>-- SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to demolish the existing 30,000 sf 820 Building and an existing 22-foot high blast wall at the Renton Municipal Airport A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Element oj the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major In/ormation Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Li htlG/ore Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natura! Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS . '-1/ ~ /, ./ ~-.L1..--~A Iv ~J;;f, V,~C~/' (/L/--7./r / '1"""--- C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas oj probable impact or are s where additional informa' is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) A Master AppllclW.n has been hied and accepted with the Dep.rtment 01 Community &. ftrlnom1c Dewelopment (C£DI-Plannln. 01';51011 of Ihe City of Renton. The follow!n. briefly IItwibesth. application and the """"'$a,), Public ApprOlfa!S. DATE OF NOTICI OF APPUCATION: F.bruary S, 2014 LAND USE NUMBER; 14-000133, ECF PROJECT NAM~; Runway BlastWalillepla""'menl Project and 8ID BulldinH Demolition Project P~OJEcr DESClUI'TION; Appllcanl propp.e. to demolish the el<lstlng 30,1)00 .f 820 Buildloa and an . ",Isting 22-foot tJ,'gh blasl wall.! Ihe Renton MuniCipal Alrp<><t. The projectarell.locatfld north ofW Perimeter lid and 15 generally !'IOrtheast of Ihe Intft,,,,,ctlon of 41",ort Way and Rainier Ave N. The 820 SVlldlng i. I".toted .t 820 W Perimeter Rd, south of the entrance to the ~Irport from Rainie. AYe N [/\PH 0723059007), The demolition WIIuld ~5UIt in the removal of approolmately 800 r;y of concrete, aspnalt, and nOllve bue/fuijndBtion blOddlng rock, GlOdlng wowd occur following dRmol~kln and would re.ult In Rllln8 the 51te al-glOde with .pproo. 1,400 ton. af WSOOT eru.hed surfacing ba.e COUI"5e Th<t ."isUng 1Hool high blntwall;s located ollhe ~!rth end oflh •• ll"j)Ort (616 W Petlm~ter Road, Af'N 0723059(07). ReVadlng 01 Ihe Inneld and glO'o .rea. wauld be recqulrRd lor the project. In add,'lon, Hmlled vadlng would occur within Ih .. bla.t pad pavement to provide polltlY .. draln .. e while lowetlnslhe end 01 the ~i.llns y.de adjacent to the MW blast wollin order to eMU.., IlIat the npw bla.1 w.lI;s below the 1'UIU.., Non-Preci!llon ,",pproach Surflce. A new bl •• t wal~ ippro.imaltly 12.75 leelln neiflhl would be con.tructed In Ihe vicinity 01 Ihe I\I!w wall. Apprc:<lmol.ly sao cubicy.rd, offill would be needed for tne project, and would be provided from approved borrow ,OUrt .. o. The sll. ISlOned 1M, ar.d i.loc.oted wlINn the 500-'1"" fioo.d huard arn. There Is. I.ndsllde ha,ard are;l 50uth oflh. ulnlng blast woll and. seismic area In lhe .nclnlly. PROJECT LOCATION: 616 & 8ZO We" Petlmeter Rood OPTIONAL DmRMINATION Of NON-SlGNIJtCANCE, MITIGATED (ON5-M~ As the Lead Agencv, the City of Renton lIa. determined thot 51gnilkilnt enVironmental impacts a~ unllk~ly 10 result from Ihe proposed project. The..,ro.." as permitted under the ROO 43.21e.110, the City of Renton I. USing the Optional DN5-M proce .. to gl .... noUce that a DNS- M 10 liltelv I<l be Issued. Comment periods fort~ projeci ilnd the proposed DNS-M ore lnt.gr~ted Into a single comment ;>eriod. There will be no comment ;>enod followlnB the Iosu.n,. 01 the Th~5hold Delerminot.,n of Ncn-Significance- Mitigated (DN5-M). A 14·day appeal period wi" followth. Issuance olthe DN5-M. PERMIT APPLlCATlON DATE: NOTICE Of COMPLETE APPUCATlON; APPLICANT {PROJECT CONTACT PERSotI: Perrnlb{l\<Ivh,w Requested: February 3, 1014 February 5, 2014 Ben Dahle, Renton Municipal Airport/ 616 West P.rlmetu Ro.d, Renton, WA 98057/ bdohle@ .. ntDnwa.iov Envl,onment;ll (sIPA) Review Bulldlns If you would like 10 be mide • ~rty of reo;)rd to retalve further Inl"..mation on this propond project, compielfl thl. form .nd return to: City of Renton, CED -Pllnnlns DlvisIon,lOSS So. GradyWav, Renton, WI>. 9&)57. Name/file No.: Runwav Blast Wall Replacement Praject ond a20 Building Demoillon Project/14..QOO133, ECf NAME: ____ ------------------------------------------------------- MAILING AOORESS: _________________________ Clty!SIaIe/Zlp: ________________ _ TELEPHONE NO.: _______ ~ ____________ _ .... t~ f . City of... -----...... I,lI:\fsillltcDJIril locltion where application mlV be reviewed: CDNSISTENCY OVERVIEW: zo~lnill;lnd w •• : Enyj",nmanlal Documants thll Evaluale th~ Prop"".d Proj ..... : Develepment Relulations U5ed For Project MlllsatJoo; Propo,"" Mltlptfon M ... ures: D<!portment of Community & I""nomic Denlopment (CEDj-Plannlnll Di"ision, SIKth 1'loor Renton City Hall, 105S South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 The subje<tsite Is de'ignated EmplO'fme~tAru Industrial an the City 01 Renlc" Comprehen5lv~ l.nd U,e Map and Medium InduSltlal (1M) on tl1e Cltv's Zonina M •• EMironmonlal[SEPA) ehe""li.t The project will b. subject to the CIty's SEPA ardlnance, RMC v.r.:c"D and other ~ppl it. bH! codes and r"8.n.tlon. as awroprllto!. Th. loUowlng MillSa~o~ MU$\l~(') will Kketi be Impo>e<l on Ih. propOsed project. Th.se recommer>dl!d Mltlgatlon tIi ... surt!$ addres~ project Im~ct. not co .... "'d by exlsll"8cod •• ond reKulation, oSCI"!«d aboye. • The appllCllnt shall ensu,e that any fill material used [In the project site wlil come from appro"..,d borrow sourcu. Ccmments on the abo~ ~ppll"'llon must boI submitted In wtllln, to Gel"Jld W;user, lwodMR Planner, CEO- Plannln, OM.lon, lOS5 ~cuth Grady Way, Renton, WA ~BD57, by 5:00 PM on ~brua", 19, 2014. livou have qu"'tlollS iboullhi. propo5al, or wl'h to b'! made a partyof ream! and receiYe additional notification by mall, contact In.. Project Man .. er. Anvone who submitswntten comment'! will automatically become a partyo! recort! and wi~ be notified o!,my d.dsion on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7382; Eml: gwasser@rentonwa,gov PLEASE JNCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CAWNG FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATjON II you would like to be made. party of record to ""c";~e further inFormallon on thiS proposed project, complete tnl. Iorm and return 10: City o!R~nlon, CED-Plannln8 Division. WSS So. Gra<ti W<t-/, R~nton, WA 98057. N.me'~jle No.: Runway BlulWall R~pla<~m""t Project and 820 Building Demolition Project/14..J)OO133, ECF NAME: ______________ -c __________________________________________ __ MAILING ADDRESS: ________________________ Clty!Stata!Zip: ______________ _ TELEPHONE NO.! ___________________ _ CERTIFICATION /' ~-;;i~~~~~~23i~~herebY certify that 3 were posted in __ conspicuous places or nearby the de Date: (iL,/z-ko/;/ Signed:A;tUL.~~~~b4~'-&z#.~ STATE9fWASH{NGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I.certify t~a: I know or have satisfactory evidence that &-e.-4e1 "') {_h S if Signed thiS Instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses,~~p.\I(.pp~es mentioned in the instrument. g;it~"1}'O~~ OIl{ = "'(I iI!'~+.9"'\-"-r---"''''-ff ... ~1A1r,. '\ ~ ~ :.~-,c.ioZ. Notary PUlC)n and for the State of Washington 1 1/1 v_I,; 1. ,,; 'l;..o. 8 29-\ r.:-\ "'1i'II"'~_"'" ~v_"~ II/ Ott W"'S~ ,-,. IIII ,,-'\\\\\\\\';-. ...... Notary (Print): U-olLj My ap poi ntm ent expi res :'------<.4-,~j"t'""IJ,..JtL----"QJ~g"','---"J!J.02.!..:.nt.... __ _ Agencies See Attached see attached 300' surrounding property owners (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING --~. /.~ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Lisa M. McElrea ~ 7, signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and volunta~iJ 11:FJurposes mentioned in the instrument. I"", "'AS"'~ ...... '_. 111"\\\,,,,,," Dated: ublic in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) : ____ ..>.\\-,..O.L.\"'W""'\-__ X"-'-Oww""""u)L".I-__________ _ My appointment expires: -::J ., r,/ '" A lAf:l W{ \;-df\ i '" v 1 Runway Blast Wall Replacement Project and 820 Building Demolition LUA14-000133, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology ** Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region '" Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers '" Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers *** Oepart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Oev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher'" Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. '" 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter Of SEPA Reviewer Issaquah, WA 98027 39015 _l72 nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office '" Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program '" 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172 nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division '" Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation'" Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Gretchen Kaehler Ms. Shirley Marroquin PO Box 48343 201 S. Jackson ST, MS K5C-NR-050 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Steve Roberge Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd. PO Box 90868, MS; XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. **Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov ***Department of Natural Resources is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice the following email address: sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov template ~ affidavit of service by mailing 0007200029 0007200030 0007200031 TOBIN BUSINESS PARK LLC SALVATION ARMY THE EDMAN GEORGE D 200 S TOBIN ST 206 S TOBIN ST 220 S TOBIN ST RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 0007200032 0007200033 0007200037 JPC PROPERTIES LLC HEALY MARTIN+ANNE SMITH ROBERT C 61 SHATIUCK AVE S 314 S TILLICUM ST 402 S TOBIN ST RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 0007200038 0007200039 0007200041 JACQUES JAMES H SCHUMSKY DONALD W+MARGARET BONNER ROBERT G JR 408 S TOBIN ST 414 S TOBIN ST 518 S TOBIN ST RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 0007200043 0007200045 0007200078 FREY CAROL HSTORWICK RICHARD A DAWSON JAMES D+RENEE E DESPUIG ERLINDA D 59 LOGAN AVE S 58 LOGAN AVE S 416 S TOBIN ST RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 0007200079 0007200108 0007200110 VICERAL EZRA FElIAS+FLORENCE VILA-YANG ANDREWLA N CHAU BILL+ANN 4185 TOBIN ST 5025 TOBIN ST 500 S TOBIN ST RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 0007200155 0007200167 0007200171 CHEN TOMMY & SHU-MEl H NICKELS PAUL M CHIEM MY THU+DAT H LU 2125 TOBIN ST 54 SHATIUCK AVE 5 58 SHATIUCK AVE S RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 0007200176 0007200179 0007200193 TOBACCO ENTERPRISES LLC REDLIN BRIAN BURKHEIMER FAMILY L L C 216 S TOBIN ST 4065 TOBIN ST 95 AIRPORT WAY RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 0007200214 0082000000 0723059001 VUONG NHUT BOEING COMPANY THE 311 5 TILLICUM ST 406 TAYLOR AVE NW 737 LOGAN AVE N RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 0723059003 9564800175 0903000000 JARVIS PATRICIA SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PA 8757 5 120TH PL 575 RAINIER AVE N 801 RAINIER AVE N SEATILE,WA 98178 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 1180000280 1180001715 1180001790 PATINA REALTY LLC LAKESHORE BRYN MAWR PLAZA L L C 11326 RAINIER AVE 5 11448 RAINIER AVE 5 11620 RAINIER AVE S SEATILE, WA 98178 SEATILE, WA 98057 SEATILE,WA 98057 1180002685 1180002760 STEHMAN CRAIG G+ THAYER MARK SEATTLE·PROPERTY SVCS 87365 117TH PL 8901 5 117TH ST SEATTLE, WA 98178 SEATTLE, WA 98178 1180002795 1180002820 1180002940 LEE EDDIE Q SNYDER LEROY J& SANDRA D PUBLIC STORAGE INC 11707 RAINIER AVE 5 11717 RAINIER AVE 5 879 RAINIER AVE N SEATTLE, WA 98178 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 1180008400 1181000000 1823059234 NATHAN MAX JR EXECUTOR MCDONALDS CORP 046·0017 11416 RAINIER AVE 5 11600 RAINIER AVE 5 59 RAINIER AVE 5 SEATTLE, WA 98178 SEATTLE, WA 98178 RENTON, WA 98057 1823059237 1823059245 4136800195 BURKHEIMER FAMILY L.L.C THE BURKHEIMER FAMILY LLC APPLIN RAINI A+POLLOCK NICHOLAS V 54 RAINIER AVE 5 311 BURNETT AVE N 8815 S 116TH PL RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 SEATTLE, WA 98178 4136800200 4136800205 4136800210 SALMINEN JED LE HUYEN CHI MT DEVELOPMENT LLC 8819 5 116TH PL 11633 RAINIER AVE 5 11625 RAINIER AVE 5 SEATTLE, WA 98178 SEATTLE, WA 98178 SEATTLE, WA 98178 4136800230 9564800176 4202401175 LANDON-SUSON JEAN MILLER WAYNE CARPENTER DAVID 11613 RAINIER AVE 5 515 RAINIER AVE 5 676 TAYLOR AVE NW SEATTLE,WA 98178 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 4202401210 4202401255 4202401335 UMPQUA BANK U·HAUL REAL ESTATE COMPANY MOSS ROAD L L C RAINIER AVE 5 12601 RAINIER AVE 5 400 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 4202401400 4202401500 4202401505 SENECA REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS CHANG BROTHERS INC CHRISTOPHERSON R LEE 415 RAINIER AVE N 505 RAINIER AVE N RAINIER AVE N RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 4204400065 9564800102 4204400070 HUNTING BURT+SHAO JUN WU KEODARA HOPE BRYANT JASON M 8925 5 121ST ST 101 NW 6TH ST 8918 S 122ND ST SEATTLE, WA 98178 RENTON, WA 98057 SEATTLE, WA 98178 9564800103 4204400100 4204400115 SMITH JAMIAN BUCHAN BROS INVESTMENT PROP GAVIN DANIEL G+STEPHANIE L 107 NW 6TH ST 365 RAINIER AVE N 100 NW 3RD PL RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 4204400120 4204400210 4204400215 HOLM JOHN R POLOTANU FLORINEL BARRON BRENT +CYNTHIA 355 RAINIER AVE N 333 RAINIER AVE N 321 RAINIER AVE N RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 4204400225 4204400260 4204400261 KNEE ARVID LOTTO RAYW KRANZ RAINIER AVENUE PROPER 313 RAINIER AVE N 309 NELSON PL NW 271 RAINIER AVE N RENTON, WA 980S7 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 4204400263 4204400355 42682000S5 POPE LACHLAN HARBOR OLYMPIC LAND 6530 LL HU MIAO DAN 257 RAINIER AVE N 251 RAINIER AVE N 8916 S 121ST ST RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 SEATTLE,WA 98178 9564800072 7229300020 7229300035 ORN BEN+SARI G FATTORE ROBERT L EASTERN EQUITY INVESTMENT L 102 NW 6TH ST 109 S TILLICUM ST 111 AIRPORT WAY RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 7229300070 7229300073 7229300100 AHN & SON COMPANY INC PHILLIPS MANIO BENZEL & YARN ELL LLC 203 AIRPORT WAY 209 AIRPORT WAY 235 AIRPORT WAY RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 7229300380 7229300490 7229300545 AMBROSE K L SDS PARTNERSHIP ANDERSON BUSY BEE INC 21 LOGAN AVE S 301 AIRPORT WAY 455 AIRPORT WAY RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 7229300580 7229300595 7229300600 SCHUMSKY DONALD W & MARGARE FRASIER CHRISTINE HEITMAN-BODEN SANDRA 511 AIRPORT WAY 43 LOGAN AVE S 50 LOGAN AVE S RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 7229300615 7229300625 7229300630 F & K INVESTMENTS LLC LEI YING KIET+MENG LlAN REYNOLDS GLENN D 36 LOGAN AVE S 30 LOGAN AVE S 55 LOGAN AVE S RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 7229300635 9564800007 9564800025 FOSTER LUIDA R+EDDIE D PHAM DYLAN CHIN SANDRA 51 LOGAN AVE S S 123RD ST 670 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 9564800026 9564800031 9564800071 ANDERSON ERIN LEE KRUZICH BOYD WM+ANGELA M OLA BABATUNDE 664 TAYLOR AVE NW 658 TAYLOR AVE NW 108 NW 6TH ST RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 February 5, 2014 Ben Dahle Renton Municipal Airport 616 West Perimeter Road Renton, WA98057 Department of Community and Economic Development C.E. "Chip"Vincent, Administrator Subject: Notice of Complete Application . Runway Blast Wall Replacernent Project and 820 Building Demolition LUA14-000133, ECF Dear Mr. Dahle: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject ap·plication· is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review . . It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on February 24, 2014. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7382 if you have any questions. Sincerel , Gerald Wasser Associate Planner tc: City of Renton I Owner(s) , Renton City Hall • lOSS South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 980S7 • rentonwa.gov NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: February 5, 2014 LAND USE NUMBER: 14-000133, ECF PROJECT NAME: Runway Blast Wall Replacement Project and 820 Building Demolition Project PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant proposes to demolish the existing 30,000 sf 820 Building and an existing 22·foot high blast walt at the Renton Municipal Airport. The project area is located north ofW Perimeter Rd and is generally northeast of the intersection of Airport Way and Rainier Ave N. The 820 Building is located at 820 W Perimeter Rd, south of the entrance to the airport from Rainier Ave N (APN 0723059007). The demolition would result in the removal of approximately 800 cy of concrete, asphalt, and native base/foundation bedding rock. Grading would occur following demolition and would result in filling the site at-grade with approx. 1,400 tons of WSDOT crushed surfacing base course. The existing 22-foot high blast waH is located at the south end of the airport (616 W Perimeter Road, APN 0723059007). Regrading of the infield and grass areas would be required for the project. In addition, limited grading would occur within the blast pad pavement to provide positive drainage while lowering the end of the existing grade adjacent to the new blast wall in order to ensure that the new blast waif is below the Future Non-Precision Approach Surface. A new blast wall, approximately 12.75 feet in height would be constructed in the vicinity of the new wall. Approximately 500 cubic yards of fill would be needed for the project, and would be provided from approved borrow sources. The site is zoned 1M, and is located within the SOD-year flood hazard area. There is a landslide hazard area south of the existing blast wall and a seismic area in the vicinity. PROJECT LOCATION: 616 & 820 West Perimeter Road OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated (ONS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DN5-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: APPLICANT/PROIECT CONTACT PERSON: Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: February 3,2014 February 5,2014 Ben Dahle, Renton Municipal Airport /616 West Perimeter Road, Renton, WA 980S7/ bdahle@rentonwa.gov Environmental (SEPA) Review Building If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED -Planning Division, 1055 50. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: Runway Blast Wall Replacement Project and 820 Building Demolition Project/14-Q00133, ECF NAME: ______________________________________________________________ __ MAILING ADDRESS: _______________________________ City/State/Zip: ____________________ __ TELEPHONE NO.: __________ ---' ________________ __ Location where application may be reviewed: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Proposed Mitigation Measures: Department of Community & Economic Development (CEO) -Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 980S7 The subject site is designated Employment Area Industrial on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Medium Industrial (1M) on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental (SEPAl Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-9-070 and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. The following Mitigation Measure(s) will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. The applicant shall ensure that any fill material used on the project site will come from approved borrow sources. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner, CEO - Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on February 19, 2014. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7382; Eml: gwasser@rentonwa.gov I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED -Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057_ Name/File No,: Runway Blast Wall Replacement Project and 820 Building Demolition Projectf14-000133, ECF NAME: ________________ ~---------------------------------------------- MAILING ADDRESS: _________________________ C;ty/State/Z;po ____________________ _ TELEPHONE NO.: __________________________ __ City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: City of Renton Runway Blast Wall Replacement Project and 820 Building Demolition Project ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way PROJECTIADDRESS(S)ILOCATION AND ZIP CODE: Blast Wall: 616 West Perimeter Road, Renton, WA 98057 CITY: Renton ZIP: 98057 820 Building: 820 West Perimeter Road, Renton, WA 98057 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 430-6400 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 0723059007 APPLICANT (if other than owner) EXISTING LAND USE(S): NAME: Ben Dahle Airport uses (Renton Municipal Airport) PROPOSED LAND USE(S): COMPANY (if applicable): Renton Municipal Airport Airport uses (Renton Municipal Airport) EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: 616 West Perimeter Road EAI -Employment Area Industrial PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CITY: Renton ZIP: 98057 (if applicable) Same as existinq (EAI-Emplovment Area Industrial) EXISTING ZONING: TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 430-7476 1M -Industrial Medium CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): Same as existing (1M -Industrial Medium) SITE AREA (in square feet): NAME: Ben Dahle Blast Wall: 116,000 square feet 820 Building: 30,000 square feet SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (if applicable): Renton Municipal Airport DEDICATED: Not applicable SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: ADDRESS: 616 West Perimeter Road Not applicable PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: Renton ZIP: 98057 ACRE (if applicable) Not applicable TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) (425) 430-7476 Not applicable bdahle@rentonwa.gov NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): Not applicable J:\Projects\R\Rcnton Municipal Airport\Renton On-Call\Task Orders\Subtask 1.11 SEPA Support\l.and Use Permit Master Application\Land Use Permit Master Application.doc - I -03/11 PRdltCTINFORMAT~IO~N~~(,c=o=nt=in~JI==I)L-____________ -, NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: Not applicable Blast Wall: $1 million; 820 Building: $260,000 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): Not applicable IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): IE] AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE Not applicable SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL 0 AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS (if applicable): Not aoolicable IE] FLOOD HAZARD AREA 146.000 sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL IE] GEOLOGIC HAZARD 146.000 sq. ft. BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): Not applicable 0 HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): 0 SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES sq. ft. Not applicable NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW 0 WETLANDS sq. ft. PROJECT (if applicable): !'Jot a~~licable .- LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE Southeast QUARTER OF SECTION _7_. TOWNSHIP -R. RANGE _5_. IN THE CITY OF RENTON. KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I. (Print Name/s) ! ltl-e.... declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that I am (pie e check one) __ the current owner of the property involved in this application or ----A the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature of Owner/Representative /-;;2j1I~ Date Signature of Owner/Representative Date STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) SS COUNTY OF KING) () D h l I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that --±lj~e,:-i'\-'-).j..fA._4-:-h..--:--:-_('_e.-:----,;-_ signed this instrument and acknowledge ij to be hislherltheir free an?2tary act for the uTil q"/;~ mentioned in the instrument. --jtP':,.L0U'---__ ~ __________________ _ Dat ~ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington CHRIS L. CHAU NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES AUGUST 9. 2017 I~ hr IS Ch&--v Notary (Print): _-"V""'-__ --''''--___________ _ My appointment expires: _....:<6"'/'---1.l.J/'---'I_1-L-___________ _ J:\Projects\R\Renton Municipal Airport\Renton On-CaIJ\Task Orders\Subtask 1.11 SEPA Support\Land Use Permit Master Application\L.and Use Permit Master Application.doc - 2 -03111 ,. I Runway Blast Wall Replacement Proj nd 820 Building Demolition Project Renton Municipal Airport Project Narrative -Runway Blast Wall Replacement Project The Runway Blast Wall Replacement Project area (116,000 square feet) is at the southern end of Renton Municipal Airport at 616 West Perimeter Road, Renton, WA 98057. The project area is located north of West Perimeter Road and generally northeast of the intersection of Airport Way and Rainier Avenue North. The project area is located on Parcel Number 0723059007 in the Southeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 23 North, Range S East. The following permits will be needed: • SEPA Environmental Checklist, City of Renton; and • Demolition Permit, City of Renton. According to the City of Renton zoning map, the site and greater Renton Municipal Airport is zoned 1M -Industrial Medium. Surrounding properties to the south and west are zoned CA- Commercial Arterial. The site is currently in use as a blast wall for the Renton Municipal Airport. The site contains the following sensitive areas: • WellfielEl eaf)tuFe ZORe (aqlJifer~t:> • 500 year flood hazard area • • Landslide hazard area -moderate (grassy berm southwest of the blast wall only) Seismic area According to the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the site is underlain by Urban land (Ur). The site drains to the existing stormwater system. The project, after completion, would continue to be used as a blast wall. No new plats or lots are proposed. The blast wall would continue to be accessed via West Perimeter Road. No off-site improvements would be made for the project. The estimated project value of the project is $1 million. Re-grading of the infield and grass areas would be needed for the project. In addition, limited grading would occur within the blast pad pavement to provide positive drainage while lowering the end of the existing grade adjacent to the new blast wall in order to ensure that the new blast wall is below the Future Non-Precision Approach Surface. The existing blast wall is 22 ft high and the proposed blast wall is 12.75 ft high. Approximately 500 cubic yards of fill would be needed for the project. Fill would come from approved borrow sources. Page 11 Runway Blast Wall Replacement Proj No trees would be removed for the project. No land would be dedicated to the City. nd 820 Building Demolition Project Renton Municipal Airport There would be no job shacks, sales trailers, and/or model homes associated with this project. No proposed modifications are requested from the City. The site is not within 100 feet of a stream or wetland or within 200 feet of the Cedar River. Project Narrative -820 Building Demolition Project The 820 Building Demolition Project area (30,000 square feet) is near the northwest part of Renton Municipal Airport at 820 West Perimeter Road, Renton, WA 98057. The project area is located south of the airport entrance from Rainier Avenue North. The project area is located on Parcel Number 0723059007 in the Southeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 23 North, Range 5 East. The following governmental approvals or permits will be needed: • SEPA Environmental Checklist, City of Renton; • Demolition Permit, City of Renton; • Grading License Application, City of Renton; • Construction Permit, City of Renton; • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activities, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); and • Project Review Approval, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). According to the City of Renton zoning map, the site and greater Renton Municipal Airport is zoned 1M -Industrial Medium. Surrounding properties to the west are zoned CO -Commercial Office and CA -Commercial Arterial. The site is currently vacant and contains a building. The site contains the following sensitive areas: • 500 year flood hazard area • Seismic area According to the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the site is underlain by Urban land (Ur). The site drains to the existing stormwater system. After project completion, this site would be graded flat and prepared with a sub-grade. Future development may occur, subject to additional environmental review. Page 12 I Runway Blast Wall Replacement Proj' No new plats or lots are proposed. nd 820 Building Demolition Project Renton Municipal Airport The 820 Building site would continue to be accessed from West Perimeter Road. No off-site improvements would be made for the project. The estimated project value of the project is $260,000. Approximately 800 cubic yards of concrete, asphalt, and native base/foundation bedding rock would be removed during demolition. About 12 inches of Washington State Department of Transportation Crushed Surfacing Base Course would be used to fill the site at-grade (approximately 1,400 tons of crushed surfacing base course). No trees would be removed for the project. No land would be dedicated to the City. There would be no job shacks, sales trailers, and/or model homes associated with this project. The site is not within 100 feet of a stream or wetland or within 200 feet of the Cedar River. Page 13 Runway Blast Wall Replacement Proje nd 820 Building Demolition Project Renton Municipal Airport Construction Mitigation Description -Runway Blast Wall Replacement Project Reconstruction of the wall is anticipated to begin in April 2014 and end in June 2014. The following construction phases for the runway blast wall replacement are anticipated: • Phase 1: o Demolition of existing pavement north of existing blast wall; o Form foundation and pour new foundation for new blast wall; o Pavement rehabilitation adjacent to new blast wall foundation; o Installation of drainage features and electrical items; o Installation of new blast wall; o Installation of new security fence adjacent to new blast wall; and o Grading and seeding of infield west of the blast pad. • Phase 2: o Demolition and salvage of existing blast wall; o Installation of artwork to back side of security fence on new blast wall; o Demolition of existing perimeter fence adjacent to existing blast wall; o Installation of all drainage features; and o Grading, irrigation and landscaping on back side of new blast wall and grass berms south of West Perimeter Road. Construction is anticipated to occur during daylight hours (or between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.). No special hours are proposed for construction or hauling. Likely transportation/hauling routes to the site include 1-405, SR-167, Rainier Avenue North, Airport Way, and West Perimeter Road. Erosion and sediment control facilities will be provided throughout the duration of construction. Existing inlets will be protected with filter fabric inserts. During construction, the contractor will provide positive drainage to all disturbed areas and control the quality of the stormwater runoff. Disturbed areas will be seeded to prevent erosion and sedimentation. The existing storm drainage system along Runway 16-34 will be retained. Three new catch basins and associated 6-inch drainage lines will be installed around the new blast wall. The project will comply with the maximum permissible environmental noise levels set forth in Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-60-040. Construction Mitigation Description -820 Building Demolition Project Demolition of the 820 Building would have a total duration of 90 working days, independent from the wall replacement project. The project will be out for construction bid soon (either late January 2014 or in February 2014). Construction is anticipated to occur during daylight hours (or between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.). No special hours are proposed for construction or hauling. Page 11 Runway Blast Wall Replacement Project ani Building Demolition Project Renton Municipal Airport Likely transportation/hauling routes to the site include 1-405, SR-167, Rainier Avenue North, and West Perimeter Road. Erosion and sediment control facilities will be provided throughout the duration of construction. Existing inlets will be protected with filter fabric inserts. During construction, the contractor will provide positive drainage to all disturbed areas and control the quality of the storm water runoff. A biodegradable check dam will be installed northwest of the building site. The project will comply with the maximum permissible environmental noise levels set forth in Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-60-040. Page 12 PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For non project actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. - 1 -06/09 J:\Projects\R\Renton MunicIpal Alrport\Aenton On·CaII\Task Orders\$ubtask 1.11 $EPA Support\SEPA Checkllst\SEPA Checklist 012814.doc A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Runway Blast Wall Replacement Project and 820 Building Demolition Project 2. Name of applicant: Renton Municipal Airport 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Contact: Ben Dahle Renton MuniCipal Airport 616 West Perimeter Road, Unit A Renton, WA 98057 (425) 430-7476 4. Date checklist prepared: January 28, 2014 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Planning Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Blast Wall Replacement: Reconstruction of the wall is anticipated to begin in April 2014 and end in June 2014. The following construction phases for the runway blast wall replacement are anticipated: • Phase 1: o Demolition of existing pavement north of existing blast wall; o Form foundation and pour new foundation for new blast wall; o Pavement rehabilitation adjacent to new blast wall foundation; o Installation of drainage features and electrical items; o Installation of new blast wall; o Installation of new security fence adjacent to new blast wall; and o Grading and seeding of infield west of the blast pad. • Phase 2: o Demolition and salvage of existing blast wall; o Installation of artwork to back side of security fence on new blast wall; o Demolition of existing perimeter fence adjacent to existing blast wall; o Installation of all drainage features; and o Grading, irrigation and landscaping on back side of new blast wall and grass berms south of West Perimeter Road. - 3 -06109 J:\Projects\A\Renlon Municipal Alrport\Renlon On·CalI\Task Orders\Subtask 1.11 SEPA Support\SEPA Checklist\SEPA Checklist 012814.doc 820 Building Demolition: Demolition of the 820 Building would have a total duration of 90 working days, independent from the wall replacement project. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: There are no plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal. If future structures are built on the former 820 Building location, permitting through the City of Renton would be required. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: An Engineer's Design Report and Technical Specifications package are being prepared for both the blast wall replacement project and the 820 Building Demolition project. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: Applications are not pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting this property. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Blast Wall Replacement: The following governmental approvals or permits will be needed: • SEPA Environmental Checklist, City of Renton; • Demolition Permit, City of Renton; • Grading License Application, City of Renton; • Construction Permit, City of Renton; • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (N PDES) General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activities, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); and • Project Review Approval, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). 820 Building Demolition: The following governmental approvals or permits will be needed: • SEPA Environmental Checklist, City of Renton; and • Demolition Permit, City of Renton; -4- J:\Projects\R\Renton Municipal Airport\Ren1on On-CaII\Task Orders\Subtask 1.11 SEPA Support\SEPA Checkllst\SEPA Checklist 012814.doc 06109 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. Blast Wall Replacement: The project involves replacement of the existing blast wall at the south end of Runway 34, Renton Municipal Airport, Clayton Scott Field. The existing blast wall is approximately 190 feet wide by 22 feet tall, and was originally built to provide jet blast protection for West Perimeter Road and Airport Way, both south of the airfield. The original design aircraft for the existing blast wall was the Boeing 727, necessitating protection from the center jet of the three-engine plane. The Boeing 727 has since been replaced at Renton by production of the Boeing 737, which has a dual-engine configuration and hence no center jet. Additionally, the existing blast wall penetrates Runway 34's Future Non-Precision Approach Surface by approximately 7 feet. In order to establish the Future 34:1 Approach Surface, the existing wall needs to be replaced with a new, lower blast wall which does not penetrate the Future Non-Precision Approach Surface. West Perimeter Road, located south of the blast wall, contains two bends in the alignment around the existing blast wall which hinders optimalline-of-sight. The new blast wall would be constructed in a curved configuration loosely following the curve of West Perimeter Road. The curved configuration would also provide the surrounding community with a unique focal point highlighting the historic importance of Clayton Scott Field. Several art pieces would be constructed on the pedestrian side of the wall. The art would consist of both static historic aircraft pieces as well as a kinetic art boundary. The kinetic art would mimic the flowing of waves, while the static art would draw attention to the historical Boeing aircraft that have been integral to the establishment of Renton Municipal Airport. landscaping would also be added to the pedestrian side of the wall. landscaping and artwork would be in accordance with future capital improvement projects at the airport. This project is being funded primarily with FAA Airport Improvement Program funds. All work will be performed in accordance with applicable FAA regulations and FAA Advisory Circulars. 820 Building Demolition: The 820 Building is located on the west side of the airport and north of the airport's maintenance building. The building contains, from ground up: first floor and second floor mezzanine. The building was originally constructed in 1963 primarily as an electronics manufacturing facility known as Electronics laboratory Building S-14 for Boeing. However, over the years the primary use has changed and the building is now vacant. The 820 Building would be demolished. Demolition includes the removal of the building from the airport property, removal of hazardous materials from the building, ·5· 06/09 J:\Projects\R\Renlon Municipal Alrport\Renton On-Call\Task Orders\Subtask 1.11 SEPA Support\SEPA CheckUst\SEPA Checklist 012814.doc structural changes required due to connection of the building to the adjacent building, modifications to the utilities, and adjustments to the site necessary due to the building removal. 12. Location ofthe proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The Renton Municipal Airport is located in north-central Renton and is generally bounded by West Perimeter Road/Airport Way on the south, West Perimeter Road/Rainier Avenue North on the west, Lake Washington on the north, and East Perimeter Road/Cedar River on the east. The legal description of the site parcel is as follows: POR SECS 7 & 18-23-5 & POR TOBINS 0 C INCL POR PLAnED & VAC 5TS LY WLY OFCOMM WW#2 N OF N LN DIXIE AVE & ELYOFSTATE HWAY#5 &ELY & SLY OF FOLG LN BEG ON ELY MGN SO HWAY AT PT 5 FT S OF N LN OF LOT 8 BLK 18 BRYN MAWR TH E 89.23 FT TH N 05-16-S1 E 438.90 FT TH N 40-09-47 E 188.55 FT TH N 60 FT TH N 29-00-40 W 197.07 FT TH S 88-27-28 E 90.83 FT TH N 01-32- 32 W 40 FT TH S 88-27-28 E 234.53 FT TH S 35-00-00 E 142.41 FT TH E 403.70 FT LESS LOTS 19 TO 22 INCL BLK 4 RENTON REAL ESTATE COS 1ST ADD LESS PORTION FOR LANE HANGAR CONDOMINIUM Blast Wall Replacement: The project area is at the southern end of Renton Municipal Airport at 616 West Perimeter Road, Renton, WA 98057. The project area is located north of West Perimeter Road and generally northeast of the intersection of Airport Way and Rainier Avenue North. The project area is located on Parcel Number 0723059007 in the Southeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 23 North, Range 5 East. A vicinity map is provided as Figure 1. A site plan is provided as Figure 2. A topographic map is provided as Figure 3. 820 Building Demolition: The 820 building is near the northwest part of Renton Municipal Airport at 820 West Perimeter Road, Renton, WA 98057. The project area is located south of the airport entrance from Rainier Avenue North. The project area is located on Parcel Number 0723059007 in the Southeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 23 North, Range 5 East. A vicinity map is provided as Figure 1. A site plan is provided as Figure 4. A topographic map is provided as Figure 5. -6-06109 J:\Projects\R\Renlon Municipal Airport\Aenton On·CaII\Task Orders\Sublask 1.11 SEPA Support\SEPA Checklist\SEPA Checklist 012814.doc B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one)@rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: The site is generally flat, with some steeper slopes on the western side of the airport and project areas, away from the structures. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Blast Wall Replacement: Slopes near the existing blast wall are flat. The steepest slopes are approximately 15 to 25 percent; these steep slopes are associated with the berm located west of the existing blast wall and between West Perimeter Road and Airport Way. These slopes are not considered critical area steep slopes by the City of Renton as they are less than 25 to 40 percent slope 1. 820 Building Demolition: Slopes near the 820 Building are flat. There are steeper slopes (approximately 15 to 25 percent) northwest of the building. As these slopes are less than 25 to 40 percent slope they are not considered critical area steep slopes by the City of Rentonl. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: According to the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the site is underlain by Urban land (Ur)2. This soil type is not considered to be prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: There are no surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity of the project areas. 1 Source: Renton Municipal Code, Chapter 4-3-050 Critical Areas Regulations, Section B.1.c. 2 Source: U.s. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Web Soil Survey. Available on the web at http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov!App!WebSoilSurvey.aspx. Accessed January 2014. - 7 -06/09 J:\Projects\R\Aenton Municipal Airport\Aenton On-Call\Task Orders\Subtask 1.11 SEPA Support\SEPA Checklisl\SEPA Checklist 012814.doc e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Blast Wall Replacement: Re-grading of the infield and grass areas would be needed for the project. In addition, limited grading would occur within the blast pad pavement to provide positive drainage while lowering the end of the existing grade adjacent to the new blast wall in order to ensure that the new blast wall is below the Future Non-Precision Approach Surface. Approximately 500 cubic yards of fill would be needed for the project. Fill would come from approved borrow sources. 820 Building Demolition: Approximately 800 cubic yards of concrete, asphalt, and native base/foundation bedding rock would be removed during demolition. About 12 inches of Washington State Department of Transportation Crushed Surfacing Base Course would be used to fill the site at-grade (approximately 1,400 tons of crushed surfacing base course). f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: Minor erosion could occur as a result of clearing or construction activities; however erosion and sediment control would be provided throughout the duration of construction. See item 1.h. for more information. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with Impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: Project activities would occur in areas of existing impervious surfaces. There would be no net increase in impervious surfaces after project construction. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: Erosion and sediment control facilities will be provided throughout the duration of construction. Existing inlets will be protected with filter fabric inserts. During construction, the contractor will provide positive drainage to all disturbed areas and control the quality of the storm water runoff . . a . 06/09 J:\Proje<:ts\R\Renton Municipal Airport\Renlon On-Call\Task Orders\Subtask 1.11 SEPA Support\SEPA CheckUst\SEPA Checklist 012814.doc 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: Construction activities would result in dust and emissions from vehicles and equipment. These emissions would be similar to those produced during construction for any project. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: There are no off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect this proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: Idling of vehicles and equipment will be minimized. Water trucks will be used to control dust in the project work area, staging/storage areas, and haul routes. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: There are no surface water bodies on the airport site. The nearest surface water body is the Cedar River, which is located east of the airport (across East Perimeter Road) and is approximately 1,500 feet from each project area. The Cedar River flows into Lake Washington. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: The project does not require any work over, in, or within 200 feet of the Cedar River or Lake Washington. - 9 -06/09 J:\Projects\A\Renton Municipal Airport\Renton On-Call\Task Orders\Subtask 1.11 SEPA $upport\SEPA Checkllst\SEPA Checklist 012814.doc 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: No fill or dredge material would be placed in or removed from surface waters or wetlands. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: The project would not require surface water withdrawals or diversions. 5) Does the proposal lie within a lOO-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: The project areas do not lie within a 100-year flood plain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: The project does not involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: Ground water would not be withdrawn, nor would water be discharged to ground water for this project. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: No waste materials would be discharged into the ground from this project . • 10 • 06109 J:\ProJeCls\R\Aenton Municipal Airport\Renton On·Call\Task Orders\Subtask 1.11 SEPA Support\SEPA Checklist\SEPA Checklist 012814.doc c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: The source of runoff on the site is storm water. There are existing storm water pipes and catch basins on the site. Storm water flows into the City of Renton's storm water system. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: Storm water runoff may contain waste material (such as sediments or fuels) that could enter the city's storm water system. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Blast Wall Replacement: Erosion and sediment control facilities will be provided throughout the duration of construction. Existing inlets will be protected with filter fabric inserts. During construction, the contractor will provide positive drainage to all disturbed areas and control the quality of the stormwater runoff. Disturbed areas will be seeded to prevent erosion and sedimentation. The existing storm drainage system along Runway 16-34 will be retained. Three new catch basins and associated 6-inch drainage lines will be installed around the new blast wall. 820 Building Demolition: Storm drain inlet protection will be provided. A biodegradable check dam will be installed northwest ofthe building site. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: __ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other __ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs ./ grass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water Illy, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation . 11 . J:\Projects\R\Renlon Municipal Airpor1\Renlon On·Call\Task Orders\Sublask 1.11 SEPA Support\SEPA Checkllsl\SEPA Checklist 012B14.doc 06/09 b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Blast Wall Replacement: Grass would be removed and re-seeded on the berms between West Perimeter Road and Airport Way, south of the proposed blast wall. 820 Building Demolition: No vegetation would be removed or altered for the 820 Building demolition. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: The Washington Natural Heritage Program database of special status plants was queried in January 2014. There are no known special status plants on or within 3 miles ofthe project sites. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Blast Wall Replacement: Re-seeding is planned for disturbance of existing grassy areas on the berms between West Perimeter Road and Airport Way. In addition, landscaping will also be added to the pedestrian side of the wall. 820 Building Demolition: None proposed. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other ________ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfis·-;-h-,-o~th;-e-r------- b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: According to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, there are no threatened or endangered species known to be on the sites. The nearest location for threatened or endangered species is the Cedar River, which contains listed fish species including bull trout, chinook salmon and Coho salmon 3 . 3 Source: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) on the Web. Available on the web at http://wdfw.wa.gov/mapping/phs/. Accessed January 2014. -12 -06109 J:\Projects\R\Renton Municipal Airport\Renton On-Call\Task Orders\Subtask 1.11 SEPA Support\SEPA Checklist\SEPA Checklist 012B14.doc c. 15 the site part of a migration route? If 50, explain Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: The sites are located within the Pacific Flyway, which is a flight corridor for waterfowl and other avian fauna migration. The Pacific Flyway extends from Alaska south to Mexico and South America. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Blast Wall Replacement: Landscaping will continue to conform to pertinent FAA regulations relating to wildlife hazard management, including: • Avoiding plants that produce fruit, nuts, berries, or seeds; and • Avoiding creating areas of dense vegetation that provides shelter. 820 Building Demolition: None proposed. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Blast Wall Replacement: Electricity would be needed to power lighting on the back side of the new blast wall (see ll.a. for more information). 820 Building Demolition: None required. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: The project would not affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: None proposed. - , 3 -06/09 J:\Projects\R\Renton Municipal Alrport\Renton On-Call\Task Orders\Subtask 1.11 SEPA $upport\SEPA Checklist\SEPA Checklist 012814.doc 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Blast Wall Replacement: There are no environmental health hazards that could occur as a result of this proposal. 820 Building Demolition: Demolition of the 820 Building includes removal of materials potentially containing asbestos, heavy metals, lead, mercury, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Blast Wall Replacement: As there are no environmental health hazards as a result of this project, mitigation measures are not proposed. 820 Building Demolition: Worker health will be protected during demolition activities. Applicable regulations regarding removal of hazardous materials from the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Washington State Department of Ecology will be followed. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: Existing noise sources in the project area include traffic, aircraft, and equipment noises. These noise sources would not affect the project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: During construction, short-term noise would be generated from construction activities. These noises would be typical of other relatively short-term . 14· 06109 J:\ProJects\R\Renton Municipal Alrport\Aenton On-CaII\Task Orders\Subtask 1.11 SEPA Support\SEPA Checkllst\SEPA Checklist 012814.doc construction projects. Construction is anticipated to occur during daylight hours (or between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.). Long-term operational noise would not be produced by the project. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: The projects will comply with the maximum permissible environmental noise levels set forth in Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-60-040. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Blast Wall Replacement: The site is currently in use as the Renton Municipal Airport. Uses of adjacent properties include commercial uses to the south of Airport Way and additional airport property to the west and east. Commercial uses are located west of Rainier Avenue North. Further east of the site is the Cedar River and the Cedar River Trail. 820 Building Demolition: The site is currently in use as the Renton Municipal Airport. Uses of adjacent properties include commercial uses to the west and multi-family residential to the southwest (across West Perimeter Road and Rainier Avenue South), and additional airport property to the north, east, and south. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: The site has not been used for agriculture. c. Describe any structures on the site. Blast Wall Replacement: The site contains a blast wall which was originally built to provide jet blast protection for West Perimeter Road and Airport Way, both of which are south of the blast wall. 820 Building Demolition: The site contains a building which was originally constructed in 1963 primarily as an electronics manufacturing facility known as Electronics Laboratory Building 5- 14 for Boeing. However, over the years the primary use has changed and the building is now vacant. . '5 . 06/09 J:\Projects\R\Renton Municipal Alrport\Renlon On·Call\Task Orders\Subtask 1.11 SEPA $upporflSEPA Checklist\SEPA Checklist 012814.doc d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Blast Wall Replacement: The existing blast wall would be demolished and replaced with a new, shorter blast wall. 820 Building Demolition: The existing building and the concrete slab-on-grade would be demolished. The site would be re-graded and compacted with a gravel base. Other structures associated with the Renton Municipal Airport, including warehouses and other buildings, would not be affected by this project. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: According to the City of Renton zoning map, the site and greater Renton Municipal Airport is zoned 1M -Industrial Medium4 . f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: According to the City of Renton Comprehensive Planning map, the site and greater Renton Municipal Airport are designated EAI -Employment Area IndustrialS. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: The site is not located within the shoreline. Portions of the Renton Municipal Airport near the Cedar River, outside of the project areas, are designated as "Shoreline High Intensity.,,6 Project activities including staging would not occur within the shoreline. 4 Source: City of Renton. Zoning (map). Zoning effective as of September 19, 201l. S Source: City of Renton. Comprehensive Planning -Land Use Map. Effective as of September 19, 201l. 'Source: City of Renton. COR Maps. Available on the web at http://www.rentonweb.org:8080!SilverlightPublicNiewer.html?Viewer=COR-Maps. Accessed January 2014. ·16· 06109 J:\Projects\A\Renton Municipal Airport\Renton On-Call\Task Orders\Subtask 1.11 SEPA Support\SEPA Checklist\SEPA Checklist 012814.doc h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Blast Wall Replacement: The site is within the following sensitive areas 6 : • Wellfield capture zone (aquifer) • 500 year flood hazard area • Landslide hazard area -moderate (grassy berm southwest of the blast wall only) • Seismic area 820 Building Demolition: The site is within the following sensitive areas 6 : • 500 year flood hazard area • Seismic area I. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: No additional people would work in the completed project, beyond those already employed at the Renton Municipal Airport. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: Not applicable. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: The airport is a permitted use in the 1M -Industrial Medium zone. As the new blast wall and building demolition/re-grading supports this permitted use, the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, If any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: No housing units would be provided . • 17 • 06109 J:\Projects\R\Renton Municipal Airport\Renton On-Call\Task Orders\Subtask 1.11 SEPA Support\SEPA Checkllst\SEPA Checklist 012814.doc b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: No housing units would be eliminated. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: Not applicable. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Blast Wall Replacement: The blast wall would be approximately 12 feet tall. The front side ofthe blast wall would receive red and white powder coating over metal cladding. The back side of the blast wall, visible from West Perimeter Road and Airport Way, would have artwork (translucent material) mounted to a security fence. The sides of the blast wall would have metal cladding with a door for access on each side. 820 Building Demolition: No structures would remain on the site after demolition is completed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: Views in the immediate vicinity would not be altered or obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Blast Wall Replacement: Several art pieces would be constructed on the pedestrian side of the wall. The art would consist of both static historic aircraft pieces as well as a flow wall art boundary. The flow wall art would mimic the flowing of waves, while the static art would draw attention to the historical Boeing aircraft that have been integral to the establishment of Renton Municipal Airport. 820 Building Demolition: None required. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Blast Wall Replacement: The new blast wall would be lit from in front, to illuminate the artistic material on the pedestrian side of the blast wall. -18 -06109 J:\Projects\R\Renton Municipal Airport\Renton On-CaII\Task Orders\Subtask 1.11 SEPA Support\SEPA Checklist\SEPA Checklist 012914.doc 820 Building Demolition: No light or glare would be produced by the proposal. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: Light or glare from the project would not be a safety hazard or interfere with views. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: No existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect this proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Blast Wall Replacement: Outdoor lighting would conform to Renton Municipal Code Chapter 4-4-075 Lighting, Exterior On-Site and applicable FAA regulations. 820 Building Demolition: None required. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Blast Wall Replacement: There are no designated or informal recreational opportunities in the immediate vicinity ofthe site. The nearest are ball fields and tennis courts associated with Renton High School, approximately 670 feet south of the site. 820 Building Demolition: There are no designated or informal recreational opportunities in the immediate vicinity of the site. The nearest is the Cedar River Trail, approximately 1,500 feet east of the site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: No. ·19· J:\Projects\R\Renlon Municipal Airport\Renton On·CaII\Task Orders\Sublask 1.11 SEPA Support\SEPA Checklist\SEPA Checklist 012814.doc 06109 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: None required. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the sitei' If so, generally describe. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: Per the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, there are no known places or objects listed on or proposed for registers on or next to the site7 • b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: There are no landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, SCientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site7 • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Blast Wall Replacement: Should archaeological materials (e.g. bones, shell, stone tools, beads, ceramics, old bottles, hearths, etc.) or human remains be observed during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity will stop. The State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) will be contacted immediately in order to help assess the situation and determine how to preserve the resource(s). 820 Building Demolition: A Historic Property Inventory and/or Determination of Eligibility will be conducted and sent to DAHP for review. If the structure is determined to be eligible for a national, state or local register, a mitigation strategy will be proposed at that time. Because the structure may have archaeological deposits associated with it, an archaeological survey will be conducted and the results will be forwarded to DAHP upon completion. 7 Source: Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. Washington Information System for Architectural and Archaeological Records Data (WISAARD). Available on the web at https:/lfortress.wa.gov/dahp/wisaardl. Accessed January 2014. ·20· 06/09 J:\Projects\R\Renton Municipal Airport\Renton On-CaII\Task Orders\Subtask 1.11 SEPA Support\sEPA Checklisl\SEPA Checklist 012814.doc 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Blast Wall Replacement: The site is directly served by West Perimeter Road, which intersects with Airport Way to the east of the site (see Figure 1). 820 Building Demolition: The site is directly served by West Perimeter Road, which intersects with Rainier Avenue North to the northwest of the site (see Figure 1). b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Blast Wall Replacement: The site is not currently served by public transit. The closest stop is approximately 0.2 mile west of the site at Renton Avenue Extension and Hardie Avenue Northwest, which is served by King County Metro Route 106. 820 Building Demolition: The site is not currently served by public transit. The closest stop is approximately 0.3 mile northwest of the site at 87th Avenue South and South 155th Place, which is served by King County Metro Route 107. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: No parking would be provided by the project, and no parking would be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? Blast Wall Replacement: Improvements to the runway blast pad pavement section near the new blast wall would be made in accordance with applicable FAA regulations. No other improvements would be needed for the project. 820 Building Demolition: New roads, streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets would not be required. ·21 . 06109 J:\Projects\R\Renton Municipal Alrport\Renton On-Call\Task Orders\Subtask 1.11 SEPA Support\SEPA CheckUst\SEPA Checklist 012814.doc e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: The project would occur in the immediate vicinity of air transportation. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Blast Wall Replacement: Occasional vehicular trips for maintenance of the new blast wall would be generated; traffic would likely be contained on the airport property. 820 Building Demolition: Vehicular trips per day are not anticipated after demolition is complete. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Blast Wall Replacement: West Perimeter Road south of the blast wall contains two bends in the alignment around the existing blast wall, which hinders optimalline-of-sight. The new blast wall remedies the line-of-sight issue by being designed in a curved configuration loosely following the curve of West Perimeter Road. 820 Building Demolition: None proposed. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: The project would not result in an increased need for public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct Impacts on public services, if any. Blast Wall Replacement and the 820 Building Demolition: None required. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle t the sit electricity, natural gas, wat , e use service, telephone, sanitary sew septic sys ·22· 06109 J:\Projects\R\Renton Municipal Alrport\Renton On·CaII\Task Orders\Subtask 1.11 SEPA Support\SEPA Checkllst\SEPA Checklist 012814.doc b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Blast Wall Replacement: Electricity (provided by Puget Sound Energy) would be needed to power the lighting on the pedestrian side of the new blast wall. The on-site drainage system would connect to the existing City of Renton storm water system. 820 Building Demolition: Existing utility connections would be preserved during demolition of the 820 Building and re-grading of the site. c. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true, correct, and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent Signature: ~~~~~~_~~=.~~Q~p~~==::- Name Printed: Ben Dahle Date: 1/28/2014 -22-06/09 J:\Projects\R\Renton Municipal Airport\Aenton On-CaII\Task Orders\Sublask 1.11 SEPA ~rt\SEPA Cheddist\SEPA Checklist 012814.doc Renton Lake Washington II _,,""~-\\\ " Source: USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangles: Renton, Washingron. 2011; and Mercer Island, Washington, 2017 Job No. 33764311 URS o 2,000 4,000 ---- Scale in Feet Figure 1 Vicinity Map Blast Wall Replacement Project and 820 Building Demolition Project Renton Municipal Airport 1 ~ I. • • , iii " f f ~ ~ Ili ~ t i , J 1 i ! , I ~ 1 t I i if. i ~ • \ ~F ~ :.1\ -"j~"",,&,! t" , I ~b9:;T ~lr I • ".' Jjl., c ' , I ll-,T----':~--~====== ,1T~i;+~t+t-' , '11 ;-0 \ \ \ I • o-'Y""c .• ',. I \ ~ ~ ••. \ .\\_\' .... j .'::., ..• ;\ ..•... :.'\ .•.•.•.. _ .... j ..... , ... \ .... _.~ ... ' .. ~; , . ..c\ .. ,.--.I.I .. ' .. \.-.'. \ lit \ \ If. i!·T··~,·\-t .~ . ~ .. 1.; \.! t" \ "" I .-'-"""""'" '/ \ I of '\:IIr ',T.~~· r!-: .\,.-1 \ '1 +_ \>; I APRON Ii \ \ l=1 \ \ \ \.u.l.\111 1\ U \ \ I \ I ~I I t1j 1\ I I \ \ iRbN\"8 ~;I ~-- \ I .!,'I'J 1 j,,'rt c'--'-' • I \ ,\ . .i., , t .. ".i+ , ... ' ... J .. I' ! . ! \ \ ' , : , , I !! '1 ! . ,'T"'" \ i' / , --.-, ~ ",' . , . .' , to. \ ~~LJ-Uj ,1\1,-'-1 1 / ~' I • ' "", _"n~'--"-I' / 1--_ ,I :' A,,-J :_01' \,: : I ' t "" .1---• -, ,1 1_I_yl_i-,.t. .... i ... ' ..... \.-.. i? .. ,-." ....... : .. ~'-'.'!.-."-""1-,\-'-~.. I ..... "" ~ ,,,l,-~:( ~ .,' i i.1 ~ \!'"'t i , .,.; . ~'. ,; . ~~.. I"" .... t .. ~ _. " l,'n,:n~" ~ , , t, f" ".,,, ,,+--\ /~ /' ~ w-:---::~~~=-f::::::::==1;;;;~~~1111-U!' , .. L" .: ........ ' \ \ f-'< \ ' , --; . ",'T I"T'f'\-'+'-"_,,~ .. t r L ~~ __ ~_I .1.,:! c '~ ,," .,,'-" ''V\ -' ,-, . ' " . " -I-''''; .:.'+ -f' -" /:/ I'f" 1 ~, 'I' alA 7-l Ii f l-\l'-ri \ \ \ \ \ I g' ~, L ;U.!i.'~\"Oo -" Ilrf' ~! ~ l ~ '" '3 CD g \U ~ ~ J I +-tw iii w-\ J :w:=L \ ~.; ~ ~ "'~ _" "I, ' -----\\\\\\ ~ \ \ \ \ !--.:1 ' • •• -~ .' . o • • _-' ... ----'11-__ w --"'-. ..' . b.''8r::;'';31 ._ 0 • --~.. .'~-~ ~>" = )(-] --;r--l1.1)f1--) /. ~~I 1 -'I Q o~-- w---=----- 22.4 J ""'==-..L-I -' I • -, -....... NORTH AIRPORT WAY _=::::::r; T H. _ ~ _~ __ ._ -=;;;;;;;;: ~. m w w n . ~ ~ p ~w I. . w AIR:ORT WAY OOt W w w ,::e ~ I tf7 --/1' ,I: --w w __ \t I + 117 I' .. i t-"' 1-'- DESIGNED: " RUNWAY BLAST WALL REPLACEMENT DRAWN: ---I CHECKED: CENTURY SQAUIIE 1501 4TH AVENUE, SUITE 1400 SE.IITTlE, WA 98101 PHONE: (208) 438-2700 r.o:: (206) 438-2699 I APPROVED: JC J. " RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CLAYTON SCOTT FIELD RENTON, WASHINGTON SITE PLAN AS SHOWN TBo , -+ , • w- Blast Wall s.t gure 2 I e Plan 40 0 40 80 SCALE IN FEET HORIZONTAL SCALE !i v j , i \ <" \ ~ \ \ \ \ \\ \ ~ ~ \;'ii ~ % ~ >- \ ~ \ ~ "'u \ \ "" " ,,., -....... MIl J1.1. It .",. ~'II!I so i o 1'10. SI8 "" t/)p 11"", IJt,> s: 1~,.o.lI 1m l~.~ ...... i o ",", r~ J:/~1 ~ I oor I~n - i ~ -::'l.. -- ~--~"" "'-'" ='it,~ 1I!l 1"71 n., ... --- :;;: jo I 'fr o ~2~ ... fNItIlfll'l~ .. ., .. -- .. <~ ~ T w <~ 10 ~&S t;4: I~~-Q 7f~ ~ ~"" ... W /' i777»777777777 1 FODFENCE (SEE SHEET 03) /// '.-i f«I..ll:Il ./ / <' <' C 'W. /' <'7/7/~/7/7<'7W)i 7' 7 /1 L ,:ro:rr I I ~n.", /1'7 7 7 7' 7 .> > 1fW'.21~ FODFENCE (SEE SHEET C3) 800 BUILDING I::E ::E ,I ::E ::E:20 fllntll" ..... ." ___ I -'''' O WlrlO. .. lit 2O,1~ iII;Jf il ... ~-- n I \ I r ~~~. o ~I o _ o II ::E .r~ ~I ::;;1-1=1 L::.e......,. -.. 0 l\')I>11.1-J 11\ lui fL IUt ...... ~ :;;: ::E::E ~ "tIP'): tt i)",JJ - o so ~~oo.." OH t top ;U 13 TEMPORARY EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN SCALE: 1"'2fY o EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. INSTALL STORM DRAIft 1N:LETPROTECllON PER WSOOT STO PLAH~. 2.. INSTALL BIODeGRADABLE CHEGK tw.I PeR WSDOT STD. PlAN 1-60.»01 EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES: 1. APPRCNN... Of nIlS EROStOHAND SEDIMENTATION CON'TROt.. (ESC) PLAN DOES NOT CONSTTTlJTE AN M'PROI/N. OF PERMANENT ROAD OR DRAJNAGe DESIGN (E.G., SiZE AND LOCATION OF ROADS, PIPES, R9nooroRS, CHANNELS. RETEM't'ION FACiU'nEG. UTIUt1E8, ETC.).. 2. THE IMPI..aIEIiTAllOH OF ntESE esc PlANSANO 1'HE CONTRUCT'ION. MAINTENANCE. RePlACEMENT. ANn UPGRADING Of THESE ESC FACIUTIES IS THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S ESC SUPERVISOR UNTIL ML CONSTRIJCT1ON IS APPROVED. 3, ALL RECMREO SEDfMEHTATlON AND EROSION CONTROl FACfUTleS MUST BECOHSTRUCTEO AND IN ~TION PftIOR TOLAND Cl,EARING ANOIOR otHER CONSTRUCTION ANDOEMOlITION ACTMTIES, TO INSURE fHAr setJlMEHT-l.ADEN WATI!R AND STORM DRAINAGE RUNOFF DOES NOT IMP,t,CTTHE ADJACENT PROPERIIES OR THE NAn.IIW.. DRAtHAGE WAys, H.1.. EROStOH AND seDIMENT FAClLmE.S SJW..L BE MAINTAINED IN A SATISFACTORY CONOfTlOH UNTIL SUCH TIME fHAT CL.eAruNG ANDIOR CONSTRlICTION AND 0EMaJT10H IS COMPLETED N¥J POTENTW. FOR ONSITE EROSION HAS PASSED. l1iE IMPlEMENTATION,~. RePI.ACEMEHT AND ADOITIOHB TO EROSlCINISEOIMEATION CONTROL ~ SHALl BE THE RESPONSIBtUTY OF THE CONTRACTOFl -4. THE SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROl fACIUTIES DEPICTED ON 'rnIS DRAWING ARE INTENDED TO BE MIMNUM REQUIREMENTS to -..ea AN1lCIPATED SITE CONOI'nOt48. AS CONST'RlIC'nON PROGRESSES AND UHeXPECTEO OR SEASONAl.. COHDIT1ON8 DfCTATE,. me CONTRACTOR. SHALL ANllCIPATE TliAT MORE EROSION NolO SEDNENTATlON CONlROl. FACIUT1ES WILL Be NECESSARY TO INSURE COMPLETE SIt. TATIONCONlROL. ON l'HE PROPOSED SfTE. DURN} THE CXllIRSe OF CONSlRUCTlON.1f SHALl BE llfE ~TION AND RESPONSIBIIJ'N OF THE CON'mACTORTO ADDReSS Nt( NeW CQNOfTIONS. THAT MAY BE CREATED BY ~S ACTMTlES AND TO PROVIOE ADOITION.Al. F,t.CI..IT1ES, OVER-N«J MCNe MINlMUM REQUIReMENTS, M MAY BE NEEDED TO PROTECT ADJACEtlfPROPERTlESAHO WATER QUAUTV OF nE RECEMNG DfWNAOE SYSTEM. THE IMP\.EMeNTATtON. MAINl1:NANCE, REI'LACEMENT AND AODfT1ON.8 TO THESE: COH1'ROL SVSlQIS SHAll. BE;: THE RESPQNSIBI1TY OF THE" canRACTOR. 5. ANt AA£M OF EXPOSED SOIt.S,INClUDING RQlDNAY S4BNOOtENJS. THAT WILL NOT BE DISTURBED FOR TWO DAYS DURING THE WET SEASON (OCT(8ER 11HROUGH MARCH 3OTH)OR SEVEN DAYS WRING TH& DRY SEASON (APRL 1ST niROUGH SEPTEMBER 30) stW..lBE IMMEOtATELY STABILIZED wmt THE APPROVED ESC COYEA METHOO$ (E.G" seeDING, MULCHING, PLASTlCCO\-9JNG, ETC.). II. WET SEASON SEASOHAJ. BtOSlON AND SEOIhIEHT CONTROt. REaUlREMENTS APPLY TO AU.. CONSTRUCT1ON SITES ClEARING BETWEEN OCTOBER 1 AND MARCH 30 1NCLUSlVE, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED 8Y THE CITY THROUGH N4 ADJI.I&TMENT PROCESS, 1. COYER MISASURaI WIll. BE APPlI£D IN CONFOIRMAHCE wrrH APPeNDIX 0 OF THE KING COUmY SURFACE WATEA DESIGN MAHUA1., CURRENT EDmoN. 8. Nf'( MEANEEmNG esc flEAStJAES, HOT REQUIRING IMMa>IATE ATTENTION, SHALl BE ADDRESSED \'VI1liIH SEVEN mOAYS. .. tHE ESC FACl.mea ON INAC1lVE srrES SHAll Be INSPECTED AND MAlNT AIN!D A MINIMUM OF ONCE A MCM'H M WlTHfHU HOURS FOl..lOWJNG A STORM e\lEHT. fO. AT NOl1ME SIW.L MORE TiiAN ONe (1) FOOT OF seDIMENT BE ALLOWED TO ACCUMULATE WITHIN A CATCH BASIN. lHE Cl.EANINGOPERATJON SHALL NOT FW6H SEDIJoENT.t.ADEH WATe.R INTO THE OOWNStR.eAM SYSTB< fl. AU.INlETPROTECnON lOCATIONS ARE TO BE FJa.O VERlflED BY COH1'RACTOR PRIOR TO BUIL.OING DEMOliTION. ADDITIONAt. INLET PROTECTION: MAY BE REQUR3) IN CATCH 8A$tNS NOT SHOWN ON THiS -. 12. AFTER REMOVAL OF CONCRETE 8UII.D1NG SLAB. CONTRACTOR SHAU. MINIMIZ1! lRAF'F1C ~ EXPOSED SOL TRUCKTRAFF1C CARRV1NG esse MATEFUAL SHAU. NOT BE PERMrrreD ON EXPOSED SOILS I.H..eSS CONTRACTOR 1N9TAU..SA. \\fHea. WASH SYSTeM TO eNSURE NO TRACKING OF MATERIAl. OFF srre. 13. THE ESC FACIUTIES: $IiAU. BE IiSPECTEO DAIl V BY THE APP\JCANf1ESC SUPER\ItSORN«) MAlNTA!HEO TO ENSURE CONTlNUEO PROPER FUNCTlONIHG. THE CONTRACTOR SHN.L ~TE AND MAINTAIN AN EROStON CONTROl. MAINTENANCE REPORT PER.APPENOIX.D oFTHE KING COlIN1Y SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAl., CURFtENT eotnoH. COPI£8OF THE ESC MAIN1'EHANCe REPORT MUST BE KEP ON SITE n1AOUOHOUT n-tE OUAATION OF CONSTRUCTION. LEGEND: (//'/j ... IIUII.OING DeNOUTION SIT! o STORM DRAIN INLET PROreCnoN elOClEGfW)ASt.E CHECK DAM 4 N J SCALE :m (11020 .fO ~ to! :! ! {ltv, 1 ~Ii .. 1Qn Figure 4 820 Building Site Plan lil ~ ...... below. Call before you dig. ~'-J ~I'-J J ~~:h I ~=iH =~~~t s=ml 5 a.. -1 ~ o (J I- Z w :E Ci w en oa . z @ o :;: n. t; "J -Oz en n. 0 OZ!;!;;::: 0::0<;1 WI-<i::E >-~~§~ o::zc!) :::>z OLL.:<g OZ_ a..~O:::> :E I-m ZO W-UJ", I-(J ..: '" C2 Job No. 33 764 311 URS 33764311_0231 Figure 3 Blast Wall -Topographic Map Bl ast Wa ll Replacement Project and 820 Building Demolition Proje ct Renton Municipal Airport Job No. 33764311 DRS 33764311_0331 Figure 5 820 Building -Topographic Map Blast Wall Replacement Project and 820 Building Demolition Project Renton Municipal Airport Notes Blast W all & 820 Bu ildin g Demoliti on Projects. o ... e,~hborhood Detail IVlap Legend City and County Labels City and County Boundary [J Other i:l City at Renton 1,031 o 516 1,031 Feet City of Renton ® Finance & IT Divi sion B.Oahle 8 . Dahle 1/3112014 This map is a user generated stalle output from an Internet mapping site and IS fo r re ference on ly Data leyers that appear 011 this map mayor may not be accurate , current , or otherwise reliable THI S MAP 1$ NO T TO BE US ED FOR NAV IGATION ! I L. I ., i L. I ... ,"","-, ............ ,,""""'" ........... ", .. OI»W> ~"-~f~~~~ " .... "'--""'-''''~',"' ."'''' ..... ~~,--.-..-.. ".-.' •• "",.~-='If,.,,_ .. ,,_~ '~'-..-, ... ""~-'~~~"' "",.. .. ~" •• , •• ~., .. ,~J ..... "' .... "'.~,~ ... ~~~,,,= h, .. " .. ·"...,.·"", ... " .~,,_,.w",...~ ." . .."<,,,,~,"~, ~c ~ ',.,-~ ,.., ,,~_~ •• ,.t"_ .. ~ ~-....... -",.-'''-......,., ::::,;;;~",,::~':,':,w,,,,1."''''''''' ~-::,','_~~~~':;,~~::;,..:'" "'''''' "'-'''>l 16300 Christensen Road, Suite 350 Tukwila, WA 98188 206.241.6000 Work Map .(0;'(' , .. ..,-. ->"'--' ~::::;::-~ --~ •. ., ... ,.- -"-"" :0;--;,,--,---. --',0:. City of Renton, Washington Apri I 7, 2006 Plate 1 of 2 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: D t epar men tCh arge d Account Number 422,725092,016,546,50.41,000 l"INANCE AND INFORMAfION SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM January 31,2014 Casaundra Commodore, Finance & Information Services Department Susan Campbell-Hehr, Airport Re: INTERFUND TRANSFER REQUEST Instructions: Please note that failure to provide all digits will result in processing delays. All Signatures and correct documentation must be included. Please prepare the following inter-fund transfer: Project, function, task, sub-task Description Amount 820 Bldg Demo-SEP A 1030.00 Total 1030,00 . *Charged Department AuthonzatlOn* APPROVAL SIGNATURE: ~~~~~-u~~'~~~J==~ ________ ~ Printed Name _~""""e.-V'...,=",-"----_:U---"""-""..,\tI.,,,,-,,ks;;.· ~ ________ Date _-I~/,-'r=-l-ll--"C).,-o=-I-'--'-l-,--· __ CREDIT' Account Number Project, function, task, sub-task Description Amount clO, l'Jt (.C() c-cC('C{·. OO~ .o, 'I S . ,)I 5J:J'A i\ev'.,~, ..... UA-itt OOO!"l7 I. DOC, C'-, in DlcecC, cui, '> <'2., ID ~-h ' Ite ·\(.~cc: ~"" iZev<lvY\ tnvpo vt-,() C C"I (£'·e,(1 J ) 1'7(c>s.t'"lVJd iU{"I2'c~ luM- J-iJ,?.D VCVl"~th~ Total I Reason: Note: Documentation to support this transfer request must be attached and all signatures are required. Cash Transfer FomVFinancelbh Revised 01/09 RECEIPT EG00019149 BILLING CONTACT City of Renton 1055 S GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98057 REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME LUA14-000133 PLAN -Environmental Review Technology Fee Printed On: 2/3/2014 Prepared By: Jennifer Henning .. --r-. City of ------..........-t< 2 r I fC' n TRANSACTION TYPE Fee Payment Fee Payment _ ...;;...." ~ ........... .U _:--: Transaction Date: February 03, 2014 PAYMENT METHOD nteroffice Account h-ransfer nteroffice Account h-ransfer SUBTOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT PAID $1,000.00 $30.00 $1,030.00 $1,030.00 Page 1 of 1 '.' Federal Emergency Management Agency Washfugtop., D.C. 20472 . CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECElPTREQUES1ED . . ~ '. ' The Hont)rable Kathy Kooiker MilyOr, City of Renton · 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W A 98057 . · Dear~r KeoIker: FEB 161007 CommunitY: CitY oflt;nton, VIA COmmunity No.: 530088 .~llYOF RENlON liTiUT~ s'tSTEMS This responds to a Letter of Map Revision lLOMR) request dated JuneS, 2~06(Case No. 06-10-B569P), from Mr. ·Ronald StraIia:, P.E., Surfuce Water Utilities Supeivisor, Public Works Department, City of Rentop., that the Department of Homeland sCcurity's Fede!al Eme!gency Managc;ment Agency (FEMA) ,evaiuate the effects thai Updated flOod bazanld3ta· foE the Cedar Rivet from the-confluence with Lake Washington to just upsireamofl49tb' Avenue would have on the flood hazard infoiinationshown on the effective Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). for your community. The FIR.M panels affected by the Updated data inClude the following: Panels 53033C0664 F; 53033C0977 F; 53033C0981 F,. ' 5303'3C0982 F, 5~033C0983 F, and 53033C0984 F. This letter is baSed oil the best available flood hazard infonDation and is intcaGed to improve upon that shOWn on the effective FIRM. ' . We reviewed the submitted data enclosed in the application package entitled "Flood Insurance MappiOg Study of the CedaC River, Lake. Waslrington to Renton CitY Limits," prepared for the City ofRenion by Northwest :s:ydniulic ConsultaQlS, dated APril 2006, and the undated supporting report entitled '"Tec1nii.ca1 · Support Dala Notebook (TSDN) for Cedar River, Rentol). Washington," also prepared by Northwest . . , Hychaulic COnsultants. We have deicrmined that the Submitted data meet the minimum floodplain management criteria of the NationatFlood InSurance Program (JIFiP), but FEMA ClIllllot issue a LOMR or Physical Map Revision at this time. . . .' . . · Until such time as FEMA can physically reviSe the Flood Insurance Study (PIS) report and FIRM, we encourage your community to reasonably use the draft woIk map entitled "CityofRenton Work Map," · PrePared by NOrthwest Hydraulic Consultants, dated APril 7, 2006, as the \lest available data for floodplain managementpurposes,inaccrirdance withPiuagraph60;3(b)(4) oftheNFlP,regul.atimis(copyenclosed}·, and·Floodplain Management Bulletin 1-98, entitled. ''Use of Flood Insurance Study (PIS) Dala as Available Data" (copy enclosed). Bulletin 1-98 provides guidance to communitiCs on 1hC use OfFEMA draft or . preliminary FlS data as a\r8ilabJe data forreguIi.ting floodPlain development · . --. .- We are pn:paring a revise!!. FIRM and FIS report fur King County; Washington and Jnrorporated Areas. Preliminary copies ofth!: revised conntywil:le FIRM and FrS repoitwill. bedjst[ibu~ for review in , .•. approximately 8 months. We will incOrpomte the modijications descn'bed in'the aforementionCd submitted data into the PrelirniOary coulltywide FmM before it,is· di.stnbuted. >. .. , , . ... " . This letter is based on miniInum floodplain management criteJ:ia esmblishe4 lI!lder the NFIP . .Your lloInmunity is respOnSIble for approving.aIl tloodpiain development and forC!1SUring all necessary permitS lequh~ bj Federal or S!J![e taw ltive' beeii Iecetved: State, coilrilY, and comnmmty officililS, based on . NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FEMA NATIONAL SERVICE PROVIDER . December 4, 2006 Mr. Ronald Straka, ",E. . City of Renton . Public Works Department lOSS South Qw:IyWay Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Straka: cmJ o:=-:'::L~NlCN UllLI1V S'lSTEr;,s IN REPLY REFER TO: Case No.: 0·6' IO,B569P Community: City of Renton, W A . . Community No.: 530088· ·316-ACK This respondS to your submittal dated November 17,2006, concerning a June 5, 2006, request thilt the . Department of Homeland Security's Federiu Emergency. Management Ageney (FEMA) issue a revision to the Flood InSurance Rate Map (FIRM) fo.r Kiug Co~ty, Washington and Incorporated Areas .. Per!inent • . infoqnation abbut the request is listed below .. Identifier: Flooding Source:·. . FIRM Panel(s}Affected: Cedar River LOMR Cedar River ·S3033C0664F, 6977F, 0981 F, 0982F, 0983 F and0984F. We haye completed an inventory orihe items you submitted. Our review of the submitted data indicat';' we have the minimum data required to perform a detailed technical review of your request. If additional data are . required or if delays are eQCo~fered, we will inform you within 60 days of the dale of this ietter. As you may know, FEMA has implemented a procedure to recover costs ;'sociated with reviewing and processing requests for modifications .to ·publishe,l flood information and maps. Howev.er, because your. request is based on flood h.zard information· meant to improve upon that shown on the flood map Or within the flood study and does not partially or wholly incorporate manmade modiflcatiolls within iIle Special Flood Hazard Area, no fees ·will be assessed for our review. . Please direct questions concerning your request to us at the addreSs _!lawn at the bottom of this page. For identificatioll puiposes, plea.e include the case number referenced above on all correspondence. If you have genem\ q"estions about your request, FEMA policy, or the·Natio;mal Flood Insurance Program, please call the FEMA Map Assistance Center, toll free, at 1-877-FEMA MAP (1-877-336-2627). !fyou have specific questions concerning your request, please call the Revisions C1lordioator·for your State, Ms. Jenoifer - Wmters, who maybe reached at (720YSl4-1107. ce: Mr. Erik Rowland, P.E . . Project Engineer NorthweSt Hydraulic Consultants Sincerely, Sheila M. Norlin, CFM National LOMC Manager Michael Baker Jr.; Inc. 3601 Efsenhower Avenue,. Alenndri~ V:A 223(u"'~25 PH:1~T7..£CMA' MAP. FX: 7OJ_g60.912S The MaPPing on DemarKfTeam, under contract ~Ith the Fedef1lfEme~ency Ma~age~8ntAge~cy. is the Natrona,l Servtc:e PrO\<ider for the Natlcnal FJood.lnsumn~.Program \ \ ' .. ~ .. , ' " , 2 know ledge of local conditions 'and in the mteteSt of safety, may set higher standards for col;lSt:ruCtion in. the Special Flood Hazard Area, the area subject to in.undation by the base flood. If the State, coun,ty, or CQmrowiity bas adopted more restrictive or cOmprehensive floodplain ~einent criteria, these criteria take precedence over the minimum NFlP criti:ria. ' ' If}!OU have any queStions regarding fl~odplain mailagernent reguiations for your community 'or the NFIP in , gene:raI, please contact the Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) for your comniunity, Jnfu!IJllllion o~ the CCO for yoUr CommUnity may be oblained by calling the D~or, Federal fnsuraIice and Mitigation pivision ofFEMA in Bothell, Washington, at (425) 4874682, If you have any questions regarding tIiis ' letter, please call our'Map AssistanCe Center, toll free, at 1-877-FEMA MAP (1-877-336-2627), ' Sincerely, ',AIiyson LichtenreIs, PIoject Engineer, Engineering Managenient Section Mitigation Division' , " Ericlosures cc:' The Honorable Larry Gossett Chair, King' County Council Mr. Ronald Straka, P.R SnrfiIce Water UliIities Supervisor Public Works Department ' City of Renton Mr. Steve Bleifuhs Flood Hazard Reduction Services Manager King County Mr. Erik Rowlimd, P.E. ProjectEngineeL " ", Northwest Hydraulic Consultants For: william R. BIruitoo Jr" 'CFM, Chief Engineering Management Section , Mitigation Division RECEIPT EG00019149 BILLING CONTACT City of Renton 1055 S GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98057 REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME LUA 14-000133 PLAN -Environmental Review Technology Fee Printed On: 2/3/2014 Prepared By: Jennifer Henning .. ~ City of --------rrp·CI rr'rl TRANSACTION TYPE Fee Payment Fee Payment '_ _ '..., -' ~ ... V-_ Transaction Date: February 03,2014 PAYMENT METHOD Interoffice Account n-ransfer nteroffice Account ransfer SUBTOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT PAID $1,000,00 $30,00 $1,030,00 $1,030,00 Page 1 of 1