HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 1REPORT City of Renton
& Department of Planning / Building / Public Works
DECISION ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION
A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
REPORT DATE: October 17.2007
Project Name: Teets Short Plat
.
Applicant/ Contact: Afplicant: Darcey Teets Contact: Joe Hopper, P.E.
2 38 109'h Avenue SE Pacific E',lIlineering Design, LLC
Bellevue, W A 98004 15445 53 Avenue, S. SUite 100
Seattle, W A 98188
File Number: LUA 07-101, SHPL-A Project Manager: Andrea Petzel, Planner
Project Description: Application for administrative short plat approval for a 2-lot subdivision in the R-8 zone.
Density would be 7.4 dwelling units/acre. The existing home would be demolished.
Proposed lot sizes would be 5,880 SF. and 5,733 SF. Both new lots would have direct
access to Meadow Avenue North via private driveways. The applicant would be required
to dedicate 5 feet of width along the street frontage for improvements. There are two
significant trees onsite, and no critical areas are present.
Project Location: 3612 Meadow Avenue North
Project Location Map
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
TEETS SHORT PLAT, PROJECT LUA 07-101, SHPL-A
REPORT AND DECISION Dated October 17, 2007
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Owners of Record:
2. Zoning Designation:
Denney and Robin Teets
3 S. Hollow Road
Dix Hills, NY 11746
Residential-8 dulac (R-8)
Doris I. Pease
16205 SE 9"' Street
Bellevue, W A 98008
3. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Residential Single Family (RSF)
4. Existing Site Use: Existing single family residence to remain
5. Neighborhood Characteristics:
6.
7.
North: Single Family Residential (R-8 zone)
East: Interstate Highway 405
South: Single Family Residential (R-8 zone)
West: Single Family Residential (R-8 zone)
Access: Driveway access off of Meadow Avenue North
Site Area: 12,151 SF (0.28 acres)
C. HISTORICAVBACKGROUND:
Annexation
Comprehensive Plan
Zoning
D. PUBLIC SERVICES:
1. Utilities:
Land Use File No.
N/A
N/A
N/A
Ordinance No.
1804
5099
5\00
Water: There is an existing l2-inch watennain in Meadow Avenue N.
Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch sanitary sewer main in Meadow Avenue N.
Surface Water/Stann Water: There are no stann facilities at this site.
2. Streets: There is no sidewalk, curb, or gutter fronting the project site.
3. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department
E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE:
1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts
Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts
Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table
Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards
2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards
Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations
3. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards
Section 4-6-060: Street Standards
4. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations
Section 4-7-070: Detailed Procedures for Short Subdivisions
Page 2
Date
12/8/59
1111104
1111104
Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Plan·General Requirements and
Minimum Standards
City of Renton P!BIPW Department Administrative Land Use Action
TEETS SHORT PLAT, PROJECT LUA 07-101, SHPL-A
REPORT AND DECISION Dated October 17, 2007
Section 4-7 -150: Streets-General Requirements and Minimum Standards
Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots-General Requirements and Minimum Standards
4. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria
F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
I. Land Use Element -Residential Single Family
2. Community Design Element
G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS:
1. Project Description/Background
Page3
The applicant is proposing to subdivide a O.2S-acre (12,151 SF) parcel zoned Residential-S (R-S)
dwelling units per acre into two lots. The property is located east side of Meadow Avenue North, just
north of North 36th Street. The existing single-family residence will be removed.
Proposed net lot sizes are as follows:
Lot 1: 5,S80 SF
Lot 2: 5,733 SF
There are no street improvements and an approximate 539 SF dedication wonld be required for
installation of half-street improvements. Subtracting that from the gross area of the plat, the proposal for
two new lots would amve at a density of7.4 dwelling units per net acre (du/ac). There are no critical
areas onsite.
Access to both proposed lots would be via separate private driveways from Meadow Avenue North. The
site is vegetated with grass and shrubs, as well as two significant trees.
2. Environmental Review
Except when located on lands covered by water or sensitive areas, short plats are exempt from SEPA
Environmental Review pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(6)(a).
3. Compliance with ERC Conditions
N!A
4. Staff Review Comments
Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and
address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file,
and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and
the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report.
5. Consistency Short Plat Criteria
Approval of a plat is based upon several factors. The following short plat criteria have been established
to assist decision-makers in the review of the plat:
a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation
The sIte is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use
Map. Lands in the RSF designation are intended for use as quality residential detached
development organized into neighborhoods at urban densities. It is intended that larger
subdivision, infill development, and rehabilitation of existing housing be carefully designed
to enhance and improve the quality of single-family living environments. The proposal is
City of Renton PIBIPW Department Administrative Land Use Action
TEETS SHORT PLAT, PROJECT LUA 07-101, SHPL·A
REPORT AND DECISION Dated October 17, 2007 Page 4
b)
consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Community Design
Element policies:
Policy LU-147. Net development densities shouldfall within a range of 4.0 to 8.0 dwelling
units per acre in Residential Single Family neighborhoods.
The proposed project for two lots would arrive at a net density of 7.4 dwelling units per net
acre, which is within the density range permitted.
Policy LU-148. A minimum lot size of5,OOO SF should be allowed on in-fill parcels of less
than one acre (43,560 sq. ft.) in single-family designations. Allow a reduction on lot size to
4,500 SF on parcels greater than one acre to create an incentive for aggregation of land.
The minimum lot size is not intended to set the standard for density in the designation, but to
provide flexibility in subdivision/plat design and facilitate development within the allowed
density range.
Both proposed lots exceed the minimum lot size of 5,000 SF.
Policy LU-152. Single-family lot size, lot width, setbacks. and impervious surface should be
sufficient to allow private open space, landscaping to provide buffers/privacy without
extensive fencing. and sufficient area for maintenance activities.
The proposed new lots would meet the required lot size, width, and setbacks to create
sufficient front, rear, and side yard areas.
Policy LU-154. Interpret development standards to support new plats and injill project
designs incorporating street locations. lot configurations. and building envelopes that
address privacy and quality of life for existing residents.
The proposed lots are would be oriented such that all ofthe lots would have direct access to
a public right-of-way. The two proposed lots would be oriented to face Meadow Avenue
North, thus matching the houses on the abutting lots. Approval of this application would not
decrease the quality of life for residents in the immediate vicinity.
Policy CD-12. Infill development. defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be
encouraged in order to add variety, updated housing stock. and new vitality to
neighborhoods.
The proposed short plat would subdivide an existing parcel into two lots. A new residence
could be constructed on proposed Lot 2, updating the housing stock in the existing
neighborhood.
Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation
The subject site is designated R-8 on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The proposed
development would allow for the future construction of one new single-family dwelling unit.
The allowed density range in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 4.0 to a maximum of 8.0
dwelling units per acre. After subtracting approximately 539 SF for right-of-way dedication,
the net lot area is 0.27 acres. The proposal for two lots on 0.27 acres arrives at a density of
7.4 dwelling units per acre, which falls within the permitted density range for the R-8 zone.
The allowed building lot coverage for lots over 5,000 SF in size in the R-8 zone is 35 percent
or 2,500 SF, whichever is greater. The existing house on Lot I does not comply with setback
requirements and will be removed. Staff recommends as a condition of short plat that the
applicant obtain a demolition permit and all required inspections completed for the removal
of the existing house and garage prior to the recording of the final plat. Both lots comply
with the lot size requirements.
City of Renton PIB/PW Department Administrative Land Vse Action
TEETS SHORT PLAT, PROJECT LUA ()7-10I, SHPL-A
REPORT AND DEC/SIOlV Dated October 17, 2007 PageS
c)
d)
The required setbacks in the R-8 zone are as follows: front yard is 15 feet for the primary
structure and 20 feet for an attached garage; interior side yard is 5 feet; side yard along a
street is 15 feet for the primary structure and 20 feet for an attached garage; and the rear yard
is 20 feet. Both lots provide adequate room for structures that would comply with setback
requirements.
The parking regulations require that detached or semi-attached dwellings provide a minimum
of 2 off-street parking spaces. As proposed, each lot would have adequate area to provide
two ofl~street parking spaces. Compliance with the parking requirements will be verified at
the time of building permit review.
Community Assets
The site is vegetated primarily with shrubs, groundeover and a total of two significant trees.
The regulations regarding tree protection/retention require that trees on developable lots be
mamtained to the maximum extent feasible, and they permit the City to require the
replacement of trees that would implement the intent of the regulations. The Development
Services Director has made a determination that to comply with these requirements, 25
percent of all protected trees shall be retained or replaced. Of the two existing trees, one, the
33-inch hemlock in the southwest corner of proposed Lot I is proposed to remain. This
results in a retention rate of 50 percent and complies with the Director's determination and
City regulations. In order to preserve and protect the tree during utility and building
construction, staff recommends as condition of approval that the tree be fenced off around
the drip line and a sign posted that the tree is to be preserved.
The City's landscaping regulations require the installation of landscaping within the public
right-of-way. The minimum amount of landscaping required for sites abutting a non-arterial
public street is 5 feet, provided that if there is addItional undeveloped right-of-way in excess
of 5 feet, this shall also be landscaped. A determination has been made that if no additional
arca is available within the public right-ol~way due to required improvements, the 5-foot
landscaped strip may be located within private property abutting the public right-of-way.
Thc landscaping proposed shall either consist of drought resistant vegetation or shall be
irrigated appropriately. In addition, the applicant will be required to plant two ornamental
trees, a minimum caliper of 1-1/2 inches (deciduous) or 6 -8 feet in height (conifer), within
the IS-foot front yard setback area for the proposed lots. Existing landscaping may be used
to augment the required landscaping.
A eonceptuallandscape plan was submitted with the application. The plan indicates two
street trees on Lot I and only one tree on Lot 2. As a condition of approval staff
recommends that a revised, detailed landscape plan with the required street trees. All
landscaping shall be installed prior to linal inspection of the buildings. Native or drought
tolerant species should be used, or an irrigation plan is required. If applicable, fence details
should be included in the landscape plan. Allowable fence height is 48" in the front yard
(42" 111 clear vision areas), and 72" in the rear and side yards. Side yards begin fifteen feet
back from the front property line.
Compliance with Subdivisioll Regulatiolls
Streets: No new public streets would be created as part of the proposed short plat.
Meadow Avenue North is classified as a Collector Street on the City's Arterial Street Map.
There are no existing frontage improvements along the parcel's Meadow Avenue North
street frontage. The applicant is required to dedicate five feet in width (approximately 539
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
TEETS SHORT PLAT, PROJECT LUA 07-101, SHPL-A
REPORT AND DECISION Dated October J 7, 2007 Page 6
e)
SF) for half-street improvements along the parcel's frontage in order to install curb, gutter
and sidewalk.
The proposed short plat is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street
system. In order to mitigate transportation impacts, staff recommends a condition of
approval be placed on the project requiring a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00
per net new average daily trip attributed to the project. One new lot (credit given for the
existing residence) is expected to generate approximately 9.57 new average weekday trips.
The fee for the proposed short plat is estimated at $717.75 ($75.00 x 9.57 trips x 1 lot ~
$717.75) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat.
All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding
Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all
existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground.
Blocks: No new blocks will be created as part of the proposed short plat.
Lots: The size, shape, orientation, and arrangement of the proposed lots comply with the
requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and the development standards of the R-8 zone
and allow for reasonable infill of developable land. Both lots are rectangular in shape and
front Meadow Avenue North. As demonstrated in the table below, alllots meet the
requirements for minimum lot size depth, and width.
Lot Size Depth Width
5,000 SF minimum 50 feet required 65 feet required
Lot 1 5,880 SF 107.9 feet 53.8 feet
Lot 2 5,733 SF 105.2 feet 53.8 feet
Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries
Access: Each lot would have direct access to a public right-oj~way via single-family
residential driveways. There is an existing garage access easement on proposed Lot 2 (Rec.
# 9312102007) that the applicant proposes to relinquish. Because any new structure would
be unable to meet setback requirements on this lot with the easement still in place, staff
recommends as a condition of approval that the easement be relinquished prior to recording
the short plat.
Topography: Both proposed lots are relatively level; however, there is a significant grade
change of approximately 13 feet between Lots I and 2, with an existing retaining wall. In
order to address the grade change the applicant submitted a geotechnical report from
Geotech Consultants, Inc. (dated July 27,2007). Both lots will be graded so that each lot has
a somewhat flat grade; the southern lot will be higher than the northern not, which is
consistent with existing conditions.
The report found no groundwater seepage or unusual soil conditions. In order to protect the
integrity of the future homes, staff recommends adhering to the recommendations made in
the geotechnical report. Because the applicant has not decided on the amount of grading that
will be done to level the site, it should be noted that if more than 500 cubic yards of fill is
moved, Environmental Review (SEPA) will be required.
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Usc Action
TEETS SHORT PLAT, PROJECT LUA 07-101, SHPL-A
REPORT AiVD DECIS/O]\, Dated October Ii, 2007 Page 7
j)
Relatiollship to Existillg Uses: The properties surrounding the subject site are single-famdy
residences and arc designated R-8 on the City's zoning map. The proposal is similar to
existing development patterns in the area and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and
Zoning Code, which encourage residential infill development.
Availability alld Impact 011 Public Services (Timeliness)
Po/ice alld Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to
furnish services to tlie proposed development, subject to the condition that the applicant
provide Code required improvements and fees. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per
new single-family lot with credit given for the existing single-family residence, is
recommended in order to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to City emergency
services. The fee is estimated at $488.00 ($488.00 x 1 new lot = $488.00) and is payable
prior to the recording of the short plat. Street addresses shall be visible from a public street.
Schools: According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton
Land Use Element (January 16, 1992), the City of Renton has a student generation factor of
0.44 students per single-family residential dwelling. Based on the student generation factor,
the proposed short plat would result in 0.44 additional students (0.44 X 1 lot = 0.44) to the
local schools. It is anticipated that the Renton School District can accommodate any
additional students generated by this proposal at the following schools: Kennydale
Elementary, McKnight Middle School and Hazen High School.
Surface Water: The runofffrom the new lot must use infiltration per design by a
professional engineer, or be tightlined into the storm drainage system or other options as
listed in, and in accordance, with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual.
Infiltration is allowed if the soils are acceptable.
The Surface Water System Development charges are required, and based on a rate of
$759.00 per new single-family lot (estimated total of $759.00 with credit for the existing lot).
Payment of this fcc will be required prior to issuance of utility construction permit.
A temporary erosion control plan will be required and shall be installed and maintained to
the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration
of the project. This includes installing a silt fence along the perimeter of the site that is to be
disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated. This will
be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as
building construction. Due to the potential for erosion to occur during project construction,
staff recommends as a condition of approval that the project be required to comply with the
Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as outlmed in
Volume II of the 2001 edition of the Stormwater Management Manual.
Water: This project is required to provide separate domestic water service stubs for the new
lots prior to recording the short plat. New water service stubs must be installed prior to
recording of the short plat. Water System Development charges are based on a rate of
$1,956 per new single-family lot (estimated total 0[$1,956.00 with credit for the existing
lot). Payment of fees is required prior to issuance of utIlity construction permit.
All plats are required by City Code to provide a fire hydrant with a minimum fire now
requirement of 1,000 GPM within 300 feet of any proposed single-family structure. If the
proposed Single-family structures exceed 3,600 SF, the minimum fire now increases to 1,500
GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structurc.
Any existing hydrant counted as fire protection will require installation of a "storz" quick
disconnect fitting ifnot already in place. It appears an existing hydrant at the comer ofN.
City of Renton PIB/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
TEETS SHORT PLA~ PROJECT LUA 07-101, SHPL-A
REPORT AND DECISION Dated October 17, 1007 Page 8
36'h and Meadow Avenue may be within 300 feet. The engineer is required to show location
of all existing hydrants on plan sheets. A new hydrant may be required.
Sewer: Installation of individual side sewers by the developer is required prior to recording
the short plat; dual side sewers are not allowed. The minimum slope for side sewers is 2%.
Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges are based on a rate of $1 ,0 17 .00 per new
single-family lot (estimated total of $1,017.00 with credit for the existing lot). Payment of
this fee will be required prior to issuance of utility construction permits, and prior to
recording the short plat.
H. FINDINGS:
Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following:
1. Application: The applicant's short plat application complies with the requirements for
information for short plat review. The applicant's short plat plan and other project drawings are
contained within the of1icial land use file.
3. Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
designations of the Residential Single Family (RSF) land use designation.
4. Zoning: The proposal as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development
standards of the R-8 zoning designation, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval
are complied with.
5. Subdivision Regulations: The proposal complies with the requirements established by the
City's Subdivision Regulations provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with.
6. Existing Land Uses: The short plat is consistent with development and uses surrounding the
subject site, including: North: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8); East: Interstate Highway
405 South: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8); and West: Residential Single Family (zoned
R-8).
7. System Development Charges: A Water System Development Charge, a Surface Water System
Development Charge and a Sewer System Development Charge, at the current applicable rates,
will be required for the each new single-family residence as part of the construction permit.
8. Public Utilities: The applicant will be required to install individual sewer and water stubs to
serve the new lots. In addition, installation of a fire hydrant may be required.
1. CONCLUSIONS:
I. The subject site is located in the Residential Single Family (RSF) comprehensive plan designation
and complies with the goals and policies established with this designation.
2. The subject site is located in the R-8 zoning designation and complies with the zoning and
development standards established with this designation provided the applicant complies with City
Code and conditions of approval.
3. The proposed two lot short plat complies with the subdivision regulations as established by City
Code and state law provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied vifith.
4. The proposed two lot short plat complies with the street standards as established by City Code,
provided the project complies with all advisory notes and conditions of approval contained herein.
City of Renton PIBIPW Department Administratiye Land Use Action
TEETS SnORT PLAT, PROJECT LVA 07·/01, SHPL·A
REPORT AND DECISION Dated October 17, 2007
J. DECISION:
The Teets Short Plat, File No. LUA 07-101, SHPL-A, is approved subject to the following conditions:
I. The applicant shall obtain a demolition permit and all required inspections completed for the
removal of the existing house and garage prior to the recording of the short plat.
Page9
2. In order to preserve and protect the one significant tree during utility and building construction the
tree shall be fenced off around the drip line and a sign posted that the tree is to be preserved, and the
location ofthe tree shall be indicated on all utility construction plan sheets. The fencing shall be in
place prior to the issuance of any utility construction permits and shall remain until the final
inspection of the new house on Lot 2 is complete.
3. The applicant shall submit a revised, detailed landscape plan indicating the required street trees. The
plan is subject to the review and approval ofthe Development Services project manager and is
required prior to the issuance of the building permits.
4. The applicant shall pay the required Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net average
daily trip prior to the recording of the short plat.
5. The garage access easement (Rec. #9312102007) shall be relinquished prior to recording the short
plat.
6. The applicant shall adhere to the recommendations of the geotechnical report from Geotech
Consultants, Inc. (dated July 27,2007).
7. The applicant shall pay a $488.00 Fire Mitigation Fee prior to the recording of the short plat.
8. The project shall be required to comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment
Control Requirements as outlined in Volume II of the 200 I edition of the Stormwater Management
Manual.
DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION:
TRANSMITTEf) this 161h dayafOctober, 2007 to the Applicant/Owner/Contact:
Applicant: Darcey Teets
2838 l09th Avenue SE
Bellevue, WA 98004
O\vnl.!r: Denney and Robin Teets
3 S. flollow Road
Dix Hills, NY 11746
Contact: Joe Hopper, P.E.
Pacific Enjineering Design, LLC
1544553' Avenue, S. Suite [00
Owner: Doris 1. Pease
16205 SE 9th Street
Bellevue, W A 98008
TRA.NSMITTED this 161
;' day o/October, 2007 to the Parties of Record"
There arc no parties of record.
City of Renton PIB/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
TEETS SHORT PLAT, PROJECT LUA 07-101, SHPL-A
REPORT AND DECISION Dated October /1, 2007
TRANSMfTTED this 16'" day DJOetDber, 2007 to theJollowing:
Larry Meckling, Building Official
Bob Van Home, Deputy Fire Chief
Neil Watts, Development Services Director
Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager
Jan Conklin
Carrie Olson
Ren ton Reporter
Land Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration
The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the
effective date of decision. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW
43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680).
Page 10
RECONSIDERATION. Within 14 days of the effective date of the decision, any party may request that a
decision on a short plat be reopened by the Administrator. The Administrator may modify his decision if material
evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or ifhe finds there was misrepresentation
of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator finds insufficient evidence to amend the
original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further
action must file a formal appeal within the following appeal timeframe.
APPEAL. This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the
Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on OCTOBER 31,2007. City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-
8-110 governs appeals to the Examiner. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained
from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the
required $75.00 application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA
98055.
EXPIRATION DATE: The Short Plat approval will expire two (2) years from the date of approval. An
extension may be requested pursuant to RMC section 4-7-080.M.
City of Renton PIBIPW Department
TEETS SHORT PLAT) PROJECT LVA Oi~101, SHPL-A
REPORT AND DECISION Dated October 17, 2007
ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT
Administratiye Land Use Action
Page 11
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because
these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions.
Planning
1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise
2.
approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the
approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received.
A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted at the time of building pennit application. The landscape plan will include
ornamental trees in the front yard of each lot and the 5' foot landscape strip.
3. If more than 500 cubic yards offill is moved, Environmental Review (SEPA) will be required.
Property Services
1. To be sent under separate cover.
Fire
1. A fire hydrant with 1,000 GPM tire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-family structures. If the building
square footage exceeds 3,600 sq. ft. in area (including garage), the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and
requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures. The applicant should note that the fire flow available to the site is
1,000 GPM, therefore no residences over 3,600 SF in area can be pennitted on the subject site due to the limited fIre
flow available.
2. All building addresses shall be visible from, or posted at, the public street.
3. Any existing hydrant counted as fire protection will require installation ofa "storz" quick discOlmect fitting ifnot already
in place. It appears an existing hydrant at the corner ofN. 36'h and Meadow may be within 300 feet. The engineer is
required to show location of all existing hydrants. A new hydrant may be required.
Plan Review -Sewer
1. Sanitary Sewer System Development Charge is $1,017.00 per new single-family lot. Payment of this fee will be required
prior to issuance of utility construction permit.
2. Separate sewer stubs arc required for each new lot prior to recording of the short plat.
3. Minimum slope for side sewers shall be 2%. Dual side sewers are not allowed.
Plan Revic\v Surface Water
1. The Surface Water System Development Charges are based on a rate of$759.00 per new single-family lot. Payment of
this fec will be required prior to the issuance of a utility construction permit.
2. Roof drains shall be tight lined to the stom1 system whenever feasible.
i 3. A conceptual drainage plan and narrative is required. This project is exempt from detention and water quality per the
1990 KCSWM.
4. A temporary erosion control plan will be required and shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the
representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project.
Plan Review -Streets/Transportation.
1. Half street improvements including sidewalk, curb, and gutter, paving and stonn drainage are required to be installed
fronting the site in Meadow Ave N. Applicant may submit a request to Public Works to pay a fee in lieu of installing
these improvements.
2. Applicant will be required to dedicate five feet of right-of-way fronting the site in Meadow Ave N. Existing right of way
width is 40 feet. Minimum right of way width is fifty feet. It is shown on the plans.
3. Street lighting is not required for a two lot short plat
4. Applicant will be required to comply with the City of Renton's Trench Restoration and Street Overlay Requirements.
5. A traffic control plan, approved by the City will be required for any construction impacting the City's right of way.
6. Maximum driveway slope is 15%.
l"vfiscellaneous
l. Separate permits and fees for side sewer comlections, water meters, and stann drainage connections are required.
2. Applicant shall be responsible for securing all necessary easements for utilities.
3. Proposed new rockeries or retaining walls to be constructed that are greater than four feet in height (from bottom of
footing to top or wall) will be require a separate building pennit for structural review_ A geotechnical report is required
\\lith the submittal.
4. All wire utilities shall be mstalled underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding Ordinance. If three or more
poles are requlfed to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground.
B4 • 29 T24N R5E W 112
I I
I " I(
CDR /
R-8
R-8
N 37th
,'<:! I~R-S N33td· prR~81
~' "R~~S /.£ R-S N3.31 d 3t
1m :-: II~ R-S .N3211d St
R-S l~ 31St 3t
R-S I
I
R-S/
R-S/
CD
I R-8:Z; l1::
Q.) :>.
St<:
R-8
N 34th St
R-8
N 32mi St.
R-8
1I=":i~=-i ER-S N 30th Sf R-Siii{ f-------'-C-N--f
1F.Fiii==9IR -8 N 29th St R-~ f-C_N----; CN
R-8 I R-S. ~=l _ H 2tltJI PI R-S
R-S
R-S 'l'
R~8 R-4 '"
D4 . 5 T23N RSE W 112
CA
CA NE 43
<J:
U ~
:z;
Q.)
:> <: CA
'r----, 'A;ijc:~~.,
CN "<:~; ,
o 200 ","00 C4
1:4800 ~ ZONING o = TiCIINICAL SD.V1Cl!9 32 T24N R5E W 112
5431
r
LOO:
~
PORTION OF THE S,E, 1/4, N. W. 1/4, SECTION 32, TWP. 24 N., RGE. 5 E., w.M.
~ K11lG COU1lTY, l'.A.!OONGfON
~ I ., / I .. "'/
I ~ /
LOT 1
~ I
0 I" / oL I Q .. 1':/ '" #" ::a '" gl #0\ I
20' ! 20' I # I LOT 2
CERTIFICATE
SHORT PLAT NO.
LUA-XX-XXX-SHPL
i -$-
I" = 30'
LND-D-DIX
0' 30' 60'
....... ' .... /~ II£AAlNa
'wlImCAL C1ATUIII IS NAW laM.
SIT[ ~ 31112 Il£APOW AVE N.,
RENTON, W... N05t
CRIOlNAL TrU: PloJIcti. , .l3427OD117
I ('lIE) MERDY CER1n THAT I AM (WE ARE) THE O'/f£R(S)
IN I'U SUoIPLE Of THE .... WD 1l:E~[8Y p ..... mp IN TItS SHOIIT
PLAT. ----------~----LEGEND
SS _ !WIITAAY SlWER
sri _ STOfIIri SEWER
D .. IIoI.S UNt
~~1: ~DJ~RDsJE~~ttH~*D lIND WIFE
ACKNOWLEDGWENT -------------SlATE Of" WASHIN~TIJN)
I
I
COUHTY Of ~IHG )}SS l{)1
~I
0tP_ O'/ERlto./) I'O'/rER LlH£
W _ ....... rm lnIE
(II -OA$ YAL'II; e -WA1'I:R YAL'II:
III _ W ... lER IrIETDt
\:I" .. f1R£ HlDllANT
• .. c.\lCH 1I1&~ o .. 1WIHDi.£
-0 .. uruTY PCU
(I-.. UGHT POST
~ .. GUY NICHOll
~--IE] _ POWER YAULT/llIAl<5FIlRWER
m -ltLE./lY PEll.
001 THIS PH PERsoti.w. k -:t'K: ~~ ~E ,~=~,.;(.")'~",",",-~"ru" .• "
THE fORE~ INSTiWMENT. NlD Jt,CKNow...EDGEll ntAT $AID IN5TRUWENT TO
BE lHE rilE£: 1H:J WWNTARY ... 01 lIND DEED D~ 'JloIE SoI.IO PEIISQI<I(5), roR
1H£ USES -'NO PUllP05ES THEREIN WElo/TIONED. AND ON OATH ST ... TED TlIAT
'll<EY 'ilERt: ~U1HORllEO TO [J([CUTE l"r1E S~O IHSno:UIoIEI'IT.
GI~ UIoID£R NY HAND NlD stAL lIIIS _ DAY Of 2007
illilARY PIlBUC IN iON(l fOR 1HE STATE
Of W,\SHIt.lQTON RESIDIIoIG ... T --=t-----e .. P/IJ!l(INO W£'lER
• _ S£CTION ~
Z .. QlJAATER ~NER e .. FIID. WON. I~ CASE
o .. FHa. PROP. COlt AS ~QlU)
• .. S£T 1/2' LR. W(CAP I2HM
(COlI) ~ QTY OF IlVlTO~
(R) _ R£CORl)
APPROViJ.S
CITY OF RENTON
[)C,I,I,IINED ANti J\PPROIIED THIS __ D.o,T Of ____ 2007. I
ADMINISTRATOR OF PlANNING/llUIlllING/PUBUC WORKS
XING COUNTY I ". LOT 121
EX.I.Io!IPlEO !lN0 APPROI'ED lHIS __ DAY Of ____ "'"'.
[l[pAliTWENT OF" A5Sl:SSIoIENTS
KINO COU'-'TY A$S£SSOR
()(PAR'Jl.IENT or .o.ssESSIoIEN'lS
DEPUTY KlNC COUNTY ASSESSOR
ro I '"
y-' --------~----
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PER RMlIER T1TU" COIoIP.t.NY. E~£ TITLE UNIT, REPORT ORDER No. -405H1
DATU .o.uOUST e. 200II.
lR.OCI' 12.2 OF C..D. hl.J..l.W(S LAkE ~ QAAODj Of [tl(N ADDnlOH 1D SE<.m.E
tID. 2. M PER PLAT RECORDEO It< WUJIoIi: 11 Of PlAlS, PADt: 14, RECORDS Of ~IHG
OOUHIY AlJDrTOR:
EXCEPT 'fII,U POIITION lYING WITHIN !lEC()NIWl'r' STAlE HIGHWAY Nl,IIoI8EII 2-1.:
SlruAlE !/oj ThE QOI..IHIY OF 1CNl, $'101.'1'1: OF WA5HNG'TON.
LOT AREAS
LOTI "n,
5' ROW D£l)Ic.o.T1OH
~l~~Pl.Al
5,880 s.r_ OR 1I.'4.t. "'/-
5,733 s.r_ OR a.ll M.. "'/-
i).lB s.r. OR 11.1)1 M.. "'/-
,2,'5' s.r. OR 0.28 M.. +/-
DECLARATION OF COVENANT
Lor 1
LOT 2
"IlIE OIII'NER Of nt£ UNO DlBRIoC£D wm-JI,I THIS $HCIIIT PLAT, IN IIE1UI'IN
fOR H IlENEflT 10 ACCR\.I£ F1IOIO THIS SU8DlIGOtI, BY SIIiHNG HPWlN
CCMHANTS NlD _ED TO CON\'EY fI<E 1llENEFlCW. IIIlDI£Sl III 1H£ N£W
~T _ ON lMS SHORT Pl.AT TO ANY AND ~L1. NTIJRf
PURCI!ASEIIS OF lH£ LOTS, OR Of" N-IY 5IJlIII~ 'IttER£Of. ntiS
COIOIANT SH.I.LL RtIoI 'Mnt 1ltE L.AII) AS SIlO. I;N "IHIS !HIIIT PLAT.
RECORII~S CRR1'IFlCJ..TE
NEW LOT ADDRESSES
wu.oow A'IE ~ R£NTOII. 'fIA 9~
t.IEAClOW .1'[ N, ROITOII, IItA Q~
5LlR'IEY Ytt1'S Ill! tXCE£OS 1H£ R[QUI/IEIIlHTS
Of" ~ Ml-l»-OIIO.
EQUINENT USED; ~. TOTIoi. STATION.
SUR'IEY IIIrntOO: fl£U) 1lIAI€RSE.
1IQ.A1I'IE F'05I1ION1oi. T!:ILflWIC[ Of SET CORM£JIS:-4/_0.1'
TEETS SHORT PLAT 8tmyIyDR'8 CJ:EmnCt.TE' ;
THIS loW' COotl~fCTLY REI'RESENlS • 9..1111£'1' 010\0£ BY 101£ 011 UllOElt
1I'f DI~ ~ ~~1H '!11£ 'R£Ql,IlREIIENlS OF ntE SUR\£'(
m.ED '011 ~COIID ntiS __ DAr Of 20_ ... T
----114. IN 8001( ___ ~ ____ H PAC( ___ _
S.E. 1/4, N.W. 1/4. SEC. 32, TIP. 24 N" RGE, 5 Eo, W,1ot
CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
RECORDING AClrU'?H * '~~;;:~:fJ>.{::.:<~.,
.. '.;.,:." '·i;:\""':"·:'~'-:'
.. 4., .... ,'t.:;,.,,~iIOil/i"';'d IU.N!iDI -, '.
,~-"'. ,·7 ... .,."'''.,.." '. (. f. .... ~ 't/-;:, .;, r'''''' -. .... , .
AT lHt R£QUt5T OF ROtlNtv G. l;ANS£jj.
-QtR SUPT. Of ItECORDS
CITY OF RENTON FlLE No. WL
OWN BY: PJe DATE: 5/14/07 I JOB NO. 20714
CHKD BY: RGH SCALE: 1~-20' SHEET 1 OF 1
..... ~JIT.
CIVIL ENGlNEER:
rJfP.&oEf~ D£S.IGN, u.c
IIirI PIN 1'ttONC:(7OB)
4l'-JllJO F.u:(2Od) ,...""
SURVEYOR;
HAlfSEN SURVE'fiNG
'742'J 118lN AloE .s£ RD/TCW,
~-""(IN£; (~') 2~ r.u:
(42') 2~Q2N
~~
UlltST R(VI5IQN; 05/14/07
A
HANSEN SURVEYING
IJJ.ID SlIA'£Y<:lIIS rl!: CONStlLTANTS
17.nt1 1l81H All£... s.E., RDtTOH, WA IIao58
tEL: -4@-ZJ.:i-e+40 'AX: 425-al5-OHl
~ • III I I
~
~I-I "
~~ , " f . i
~a.. ¥ , I!i~ I ! 1/~ I ~ t !, fl' · i~ : I • I
I II
till
I I . I I .•
~(f) ! 111r1 !!
~I--I d w ~w I -U ~I-.J I
~ " I" I I'
b e ~!I i
~
iii
10
a:
Z
~
f-'
~
~
II!
.f ....
~
~
t
~
III
w
j!:
IL
0
Z
0 ~
~
· "", f
-
I
I
I
~
'h
-c z: : U
---1 --
I
I
I
-_ 0-_-=--_:-. __
--_ -0 .:
..
Ii
..J
, ,
I~
. ..". \. ,
T==~~~~=~="f-~"=---=.-""l
i~~' , 1m' i~ .
i!1
9OV-/
-l-----l.-
I
-;
!: ~
.' .
~ ,. . -,
(.'" ,,' ,~~
,.
,._ > ~: ----::::;: .. i-J .~ :r;.
C>
~~: tJ,i
, ,. ,.:~
. ';.."";'
-" ~ '"
, ,
.. l:'..---
-l ----.
.uIOHS 9.L33.l
-~
I
I
-----
I
I
I
I
I ----1 -
I
I
I
---1_
Denis Law
Mayor
May 27,2009
Joseph Hopper, P.E.
Project Manager
Pacific Engineering Design, Inc.
15445 53'd Avenue 5 #100
Seattle, WA 98188
SUBJECT: Request for Extension of Project's Period of Validity
Teets Short Plat / City of Renton File LUA07-101, SHPL-A
Dear Mr. Hopper:
This letter is sent in response to your request for an extension of the above referenced project's
approved period of validity.
Section 4-7-070M of the Renton Municipal Code, relating to short plats, authorizes the City to
approve a single one-year extension of the usual two-year expiration. Under Ordinance No.
5452 (RMC 4-1-080F) authorization has been given to the Planning Director to approve an
additional two-year extension beyond the standard extensions possible under the Code for any
land use or subdivision project that was valid on or after April 1, 2009.
Our records indicate that this project will expire on October 17,2009. We understand that you
are still working to complete this project and will require additional time. Therefore, your
request for the standard one-year extension and the additional two-year extension under
Ordinance No. 5452 is hereby granted. You now have until October 17, 2012 to complete and
record this project.
You should be aware this is a one-time only extension and if the project is not completed and
recorded by the new expiration date it will become null and void and you will need to resubmit
all application materials.
I hope this extension meets your needs and that your project can be completed. You may call
Laureen Nicolay at (425) 430-7294 if you have any further questions.
Sincerely, \ I
C-£_ V v---'--~
C.E. "Chip" Vincent
Planning Director
cc: Darcey Teets / Applicant
City of Renton File No. LUA07-101, SHPL-A
Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager
Jan lilian, Plan Reviewer
Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Wa5hington 98057 • rentonwa.gov
" PACIFIC ~NGINEERING DESIGN, LLC;=====: :::::::::;
J
.CIVI L ENGIN EERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS
I
May 21,2009
C.E. Vincent
City of Renton
Department of Community & Economic Development
lOSS South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
Subject: Teets Short Plat Expiration Extension
City of Renton File LUA07-101, SHPL-A
Dear Mr. Vincent:
Project No.: 06089
I would like to request the standard extension of one (I )-year for the above referenced
application under RMC 4-7-050M of the Renton Municipal Code, as well as the
additional two (2)-year extension under Ordinance No. 5452.
If you have further questions, please contact me at (206) 431-7970.
Best Regards,
IJ
oseph Hopper, P.E.
roject Manager
www.paceng.com
15445 53RD AVENUE SOUTH, SUrTE100,SEAl'TLE, WA 881 SB FAX 206388-1648 PHONE425251-BB11 206431-7970
=PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN, LLC=
S:EI',nLE VIlA 981
CIVIL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CDN5ULTANTo 22 1'4AY z":uJ PM 7 T --...: j~~''''''''""",::~:~'", 15445 53RD AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 100
SEATTLE. WA 9B1 SS
~'::iEiO!!.::;7:±:.3:'"232 CCi.i::I9 1" I J I III j ,Ii I I I ,I, j ,1111 i I I I j I I I j I i I I 1 J I I I J I 1,1 , I, I" J II II III
Denis Law
Mayor
May 18, 2009
Joe Hopper, P .E.
Pacific Engineering Design, LLC
15445 53rd Avenue 5 #100
Seattle, WA 98188
Department of Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Expiration period for Teets Short Plat
City of Renton File LUA07-101, SHPl-A
Dear Mr. Hopper:
The City of Renton Planning Division approved the above referenced application on October 17,
2007. This approval is ordinarily good for two (2) year(s). Pursuant to RMC 4-7-0S0M of the Renton
Municipal Code, you may upon written request, prior to the expiration of the project, receive a
single one (l)-year extension from the Planning Division.
In addition to the above one (l)-year extension, the City Council under Ordinance No. 5452
(enclosed), has granted an extension o/the period o/validity on lond use and subdivision approvals.
Therefore, certain land use and/or subdivision approvals expiring after April 1,2009, upon written
request and prior to the expiration of the project, may receive an additional one-time two (2)-year
extension beyond the standard expiration date listed in RMC 4-8 and RMC 4-9.
Our records indicate that the above referenced application will expire on October 17, 2009. This
letter is to inform you that prior to the expiration date of this project, you may submit a written
request for the standard extension the project would normally receive under RMC 4-7, RMC 4-8,
and RMC 4-9, as well as request the additional two (2)-year extension under Ordinance No. 5452.
Please be aware that this extension does not apply to temporary use permits, building permits, or
public works permits. Also, this provision shall automatically expire on December 31,2010, and
shall be removed from the code at that time unless another ordinance is passed extending this
date.
If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact Laureen Nicolay at (425) 430-7294.
Sincerely, \J~.
C,Z--
C. E. Vincent
Planning Director
Enclosure: Copy of Ordinance #5452
cc: Darcey Teets / Applicant
City of Renton File No. LUA07-101, SHPL-A
Chip Vincent, Planning Director
Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager
Neil Watts, Development Services Director
Kayren Kittrick, Development Engineering Supervisor
Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov
April 15,2008
Mr. Darcey Teets
2838 109th Avenue SE
Bellevue, Washington 98004
Re: Teets Short Plat
3612 Meadow Avenue North
Renton, WA 98056
Dear Mr. Teets:
On April 15,2008, the Development Services Director granted your application for a
fee-in-lieu of installing offsite improvements consisting of sidewalks, curb, gutter, and pavement fronting the site
in Meadow Avenue North. The fee for improvements has been calculated as follows:
FEE PER
SQUARE YARD # SQUARE
(SY) OR LINEAL YARDS OR
ITEM FOOT (LF) LINEAL FEET EXTENDED COST
Sidewalk fronting
Meadow Avenue North 38.001LF 108 $4,104.00
Curb and Gutter
Meadow Avenue North 48.00/LF !O8 $5,184.00
TOTAL FEE-IN-LIEU OF DUE CITY OF RENTON $9,288.00
This fee must be received by the City prior to recording of the short plat.
According to City code, you have 15 days from today's date to appeal the administrative determination. Appeals
are to be filed in writing, with the City Clerk and require a filing fee in the amount of $75.00. Additional
information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's office by calling (425)
430-6510.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Mike Dotson,
Engineering Specialist at (425) 430-7304.
Sincerely,
Linda Moschetti
Administrative Assistant
Public Works Department
cc: Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator
Neil Watts, Director, Development Services
Mike Dotson, Engineering Specialist
Jan Illian, Engineering Specialist
Denis Law
Mayor
May 18, 2009
Joe Hopper, P.E.
Pacific Engineering Design, LLC
15445 53rd Avenue S #100
Seattle, WA 98188
Department of Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Expiration period for Teets Short Plat
City of Renton File LUA07-101, SHPL-A
Dear Mr. Hopper:
The City of Renton Planning Division approved the above referenced application on October 17,
2007. This approval is ordinarily good for two (2) year(s). Pursuant to RMC 4-7-050M of the Renton
Municipal Code, you may upon written request, prior to the expiration of the project, receive a
single one (1)-year extension from the Planning Division.
In addition to the above one (l)-year extension, the City Council under Ordinance No. 5452
(enclosed), has granted an extension a/the period a/validity on land use and subdivision approvals.
Therefore, certain land use and/or subdivision approvals expiring after April 1, 2009, upon written
request and prior to the expiration of the project, may receive an additional one-time two (2)-year
extension beyond the standard expiration date listed in RMC 4-8 and RMC 4-9.
Our records indicate that the above referenced application will expire on October 17, 2009. This
letter is to inform you that prior to the expiration date of this project, you may submit a written
request for the standard extension the project would normally receive under RMC 4-7, RMC 4-8,
and RMC 4-9, as well as request the additional two (2)-year extension under Ordinance No. 5452.
Please be aware that this extension does not apply to temporary use permits, building permits, or
public works permits. Also, this provision shall automatically expire on December 31, 2010, and
shall be removed from the code at that time unless another ordinance is passed extending this
date.
If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact Laureen Nicolay at (425) 430-7294.
Sincerely, \J ~
C.Z-
C. E. Vincent
Planning Director
Enclosure: Copy of Ordinance #5452
cc: Darcey Teets / Applicant
City of Renton File No. LUA07-101, SHPL-A
Chip Vincent, Planning Director
Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager
Neil Watts, Development Services Director
Kayren Kittrick, Development Engineering Supervisor
Renton City Hall • lOSS South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov
1
Denis Law, Mayor
November 24, 2008
Darcey Teets
2838 109 th Ave SE
Bellevue EA 98004
CITY
SUBJECT: TEETS SHORT PLAT LUA07-10!-SHPL
Dear Mr. Teets:
F RENTON
Department of Community and
Economic Development
Alex Pietsch, Administrator
The review submittal on the above-mentioned short plat has been completed and the following comments
have been returned. Please review these comments and make the necessary changes. Once changes have
been completed please resubmit three copies of the short plat drawings and three copies of any other
related documents.
SHORT PLAT REVIEW COMMENTS:
I. Contact Jan Illian, Plan Reviewer, at 425-430-7216, for requirements to be completed on the civil
construction portion to your project.
2. DEED OF DEDICATION NOTE: The dedication of land for street purposes on the short
plat (the 5' strip adjoining Meadow Ave N) requires approval by the City Council. Said
dedication is achieved via a recorded City of Renton Dedication Deed document. If the
dedication is to be recorded with the short plat, the dedication process needs to be timed in
such a way that Council approval and all other matters pertaining to the dedication have
been addressed and resolved, and said document is ready to record. The Deed of
Dedication document includes both a legal description exhibit and a map exhibit. The
legal description exhibit should be prepared, stamped, dated and signed by the applicant's
surveyor. The surveyor should also prepare the map exhibit. The first page of said
document needs to include an abbreviated legal description. The dedication process
requires an updated title report Plat Certificate document, dated within 45 days of Council
action on said dedication. Talk to the Project Manager if there are questions or further
information is needed.
3. Note the City of Renton land record number, LND-20-0499, on the drawing sheet in the
space already provided.
4. Note all easements, covenants and agreements of record on the short plat drawing. Include
Rec. No. 4695952 on the short plat submittal (relinquishment of all easements for access,
light, view and air), as it is listed under the "EXCEPTIONS" section ofthe title report.
5. The addresses for the lots are: Lot 1 is 3616 Meadow Ave N, Lot 2 is 3610 Meadow Ave
N. Note said addresses in the spaces already provided on the submittal.
___ I_:IP_I_anR_eVl_'e_wl_CO_LS_O_N\S_ho_rtp_l_ats_2_00_8_IT_eets_S_HP_L_02_L_C_honge __ RCQ_uestS_to_p_.d_oc _______ ~,
1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98057
® This paper contains 50% recycled material. 30% post consumer
AHEAD OF THE C.URVE
, June 19,2008
Page 2
6. The current short plat submittal shows that Darcey Teets is the property owner. Note that
all vested owners of the property, at the time of recording, need to sign the final short plat
submittal. Provide notary blocks as needed.
7. Note the Basis of Bearing on the submittal.
8. Change the name of the "CERTIFICATE" block to OWNER'S DECLARATION.
9. Remove the building setback lines from the short plat drawing and the "LEGEND" block.
Setbacks will be determined at the time that building permits are issued.
10. The City of Renton Administrator, Department of Public Works, is the only city official
who signs this short plat. Note that this is a new title.
I I. Show a horizontal line between the approvals for the City of Renton and King County to
give better separation between the two.
12. Remove the "SITE ADDRESS" block.
13. See the attachment for circled items to address.
14. Please provide an updated short plat certificate.
IS. The intent ofthe owner is to dedicate property to the city for street purposes. Please
submit a Deed of Dedication document and executed REETA form to the city.
Should you need to discuss any portion of this letter please contact me at (425) 430-7235.
Sincerely,
{rl~;'>/~~ ~((OfJA'/!
Carrie K. Olson
Development Services, Plan Review
/FAXED TO; Joe Hopper, P.E., Pacific Engineering Design, LLC: 206-388-1648
cc; Yellow File
:0
:1
20' 25'
FENCE
1.8' S
3.6' W
FNO IRC #"332
0.09'5 & O.03'E
OF CALC. COR.
WTl
1.0':1'2
COVERED
3.5' CHAIN CONCRETE
LINK FENCE EAVE ~ SHED
Co ~-L2c..--=:-,,;,(_ ~~=i:.:::-;.~~~~S~.~B~8·,;:;44::,'~0:~~ ~E;",,,,1,:,.1:;5;;,;.6;;;6,..,' T _"'-"'-....... "'-.,,....~-~. ~ r (5 B8"42'07"E 1lt,79'-SP 194/11) '"'
q I I I ,OY I ---11),66'--1 :g , I ( ,
5' RIGHT OF WAY <0 ROOF
DEDICATION 1:t--j:.....:.~--:--.J~5J' 10' FRONT Yi,RD OVERHANG
5' RIGHT OF WAY
DEDICATION
20'
25'
'&:i' Q.. _ I / BSBL (TYP, , 2.0'5 I
r,.., I OJ / LOml 1 v~b-"; I ,,!~l() r-. o
L
5' I! 1 1 , r-L1 ~ \ I
25'
'In o -N
5'SIDE YARD -'·S8L (:~ i :
FENCE
0.2' S
,
20' Rf-"R YARD
BSBL (TYP.) ~
LOT 2 I
125,00'
-1--
~FENCE
1.0' S
ROOF
OVERHANG
2.0'5
SET IRC #21
2.0' OFFSE
LD o
-.:t
/
~CONC. SOU
BARRIER WI
-+-125.00'
, .. ~ ..
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
November 24, 2008
Carrie Olson
Sonja J. Fesser y~
Teets Short Plat, LUA-07-101-SHPL
Format and Legal Description Review
Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the
following comments:
Comments for the Applicant:
DEED OF DEDICATION NOTE: The dedication of land for street purposes on the short
plat (the 5' strip adjoining Meadow Ave N) requires approval by the City Council. Said
dedication is achieved via a recorded City of Renton Dedication Deed document. If the
dedication is to be recorded with the short plat, the dedication process needs to be timed in
such a way that Council approval and all other matters pertaining to the dedication have
been addressed and resolved, and said document is ready to record. The Deed of
Dedication document includes both a legal description exhibit and a map exhibit. The legal
description exhibit should be prepared, stamped, dated and signed by the applicant's
surveyor. The surveyor should also prepare the map exhibit. The first page of said
document needs to include an abbreviated legal description. The dedication process
requires an updated title report Plat Certificate document, dated within 4S days of Council
action on said dedication. Talk to the Project Manager if there are questions or further
information is needed.
Note the City of Renton land record number, LND-20-0499, on the drawing sheet in the
space already provided.
Note !ill easements, covenants and agreements of record on the short plat drawing. Include
Rec. No. 4695952 on the short plat submittal (relinquishment of all easements for access,
light, view and air), as it is listed under the "EXCEPTIONS" section of the title report.
The addresses for the lots are: Lot I is 3616 Meadow Ave N, Lot 2 is 36\0 Meadow Ave
!:{. Note said addresses in the spaces already provided on the submittal.
The current short plat submittal shows that Darcey Teets is the property owner. Note that
all vested owners of the property, at the time of recording, need to sign the final short plat
submittal. Provide notary blocks as needed.
\H:\Filc Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-20 -Short Plats\0499\RV081120.doc
, " .
November 24, 2008
Page 2
Note the Basis of Bearing on the submittal.
Change the name of the "CERTIFICATE" block to OWNER'S DECLARATION.
Remove the building setback lines from the short plat drawing and the "LEGEND" block.
Setbacks will be determined at the time that building permits are issued.
The City of Renton Administrator, Department of Public Works, is the only city official
who signs this short plat. Note that this is a new title.
Show a horizontal line between the approvals for the City of Renton and King County to
give better separation between the two.
Remove the "SITE ADDRESS" block.
See the attachment for circled items to address.
Comments for the Project Manager:
The approval slip, dated November 12, 200S, notes that a short plat certificate is enclosed
in the review package. However, the short plat certificate does not appear to be with the
other attachments. Please provide the certificate.
The intent of the owner is to dedicate property to the city for street purposes. Has a Deed
of Dedication document been submitted to the city?
H:\File Sys\LND -Land Suhdivision & Surveying Records\LND-20 -Short Plats\0499\R VOSI120.doc\cor
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNINGIBUILDINGIPUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
November 12, 2008
Bob Mac Onie, Technical Services
Sonja Fesser, Technical Services
Carrie Olson, Plan Review X7235~
TEETS SHORT PLAT LUA07-101-SHPL cCS -(ycfc;C!
AND LEGAL REVIEW
Attached is the most recent version of the above-referenced short plat. The following attachments
are enclosed for your review:
• Lot Closures
• Short Plat Certificate
• Garage Relinquishment Recorded Document
• Short Plat drawings
If all review concerns have been addressed, please sign below or return your comments as needed.
Thanks.
Approval: c:-:----=-=-=--::-.,--:------\'--c::--:-=:-------, Date: ____ _
Robert T Mac Onie, Jr. Sonja Fesser
Ce: Y tHow File
I:\PlanReviewICOLSON\Shortplats 2008ITeets SHPL Olm PR-TS RcviewStart.doc
DATE:
TO:
ROUTE TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNINGffiUILDINGIPUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
November 12, 2008
Jan lilian, Plan Review
Kayren Kittrick, Plan Review
Carrie Olson, Plan Review
TEETS SHORT PLAT LUA07-101-SHPL
Attached is the most recent version of the above-referenced short plat. If all review concerns have
been addressed, please sign below or return your comments as needed. Thanks.
Attachment included:
Garage Relinquishment Recorded Document, Lot Closures, Short Plat drawings
Also provide the following information requested by Gregg Zimmermen as requirement of project
closeout and signing of short plat mylars.
Status Of: ~ &1m!!. ~ ~[2iw!!! Comments
As·Builts
Cost Data Inventory
Bill of Sale
Easements 1. Garage Relinquishment Recorded Document
(Water, Sewer, Utilities,
Hydrant, etc.)
Deed of Dedication Square Footage: 538.09 Deed has not been submitted 1.
yet.
Restrictive Covenants 1.
Maintenance Bond Release Pennit Bond
Comments:
Approval: ::::------,-:-:---:-:--------~-----,-c--------" Date: ____ _
Kayren Kittrick Jan Illian
Cc: Yellow File
To:
EngineEJ.lJjjY
Design, Llr;
CIvil Engineering i::
Planning ConsultaU!$
City of Renton
1055 S Grady Way
Renton, W A 98055
Site Location:
15445 53'd Ave S
Seattle, W A 98188
Letter of Transmittal
Mailing Address: PO Box 24060
Federal Way, W A 98093
Phone: (206) 431-7970
Fax: (206) 388-1648
Website: www.paceng.com
Date: September 15, 2008
Attn: Carrie Olson
Job No: 06089
Project: Teets Short Plat
We Are Sending You: Final Plat Submittal
Copies No.
3 I
3 4
3 I
I 2
Remarks:
-----------------------------------------------------
Via: DFax Sheets Including
Transmittal
D Courier Hour Courier #
Fax #
D Mail [gJ Other Submitted at Counter
Description
Final Short Plat Plan (9/3/08)
Lot Closures (8/28/08)
Planting/Tree Retention Plan (LI) (11120/07)
Garage Access Easement Relinquishment Recording #20080219001158
Enclosed for your review is the final short plat and associated documents. If you need anything else,
please let me know. Thank you.
Copy: File
D Original
__ 5130
__ 5135
__ 5136
CI1YOFAENTON
RECEWED
SEP 152008
BU IlDiNGDIVISION
Signed: ~ 'PaM.di4e
D File Copy
__ 5137
__ 5140
__ 5152
D Billing Copy
__ 5154
__ 5155
__ 5165
· "Sight" Survey 990601·Z-0701 Thursday, August 28, 2008 6:58 am. Pg: 1
Registered to: RODNEEY HANSEN
File Name: K:\COGO\2007\20714.ASC
Poiut Direction Distance Northing
Database opened: Thursday, August 28, 2008 6:56 am.
ORlGnvALLOTBOUNDARY
Start
4220 7662.714
S 88°44'07" E 115.66
4221 7660.161
S4°34'19"W 107.77
4222 7552.736
N 88°45'0 I" W 110.19
4223 7555.139
Raw: l.3943NE 107.62
TC N 1°39'43" E 107.62
4220 7662.714
TC N 26°04'00" W 0.00
4220 7662.714
Precision Ratio = 1: 1.95E+06
Lengtb Traversed = 441.23
Lengtb To Close = 0.00
Error iu Latitude = 0.00
Error in Departure 0.00
Error in Elevation = 0.00
Area = 12150.567 Sq. Feet or 0.279 Acres
Easting Elevation
9289.890 0.000
9405.518 0.000
9396.928 0.000
9286.769 0.000
9289.890 0.000
9289.890 0.000
· "Sight" Survey 990601-Z-0701 Thursday, August 28, 2008 7:00 am. Pg: 1
Registered to: RODNEEY HANSEN
File Name: K:ICOGOI2007\20714.ASC
Point Direction Distance Northing
Database opened: Thursday, August 28, 2008 6:56 am.
Eastiog Elevation
RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION BOUNDARY
Start
4220 7662.714 9289.890
S 88°44'07" E 5.00
4235 7662.604 9294.889
S 1°39'43" W 107.62
4254 7555.030 9291.768
N 88°45'01" W 5.00
4223 7555.139 9286.769
Raw: l.3943NE 107.62
TC N 1°39'43" E 107.62
4220 7662.714 9289.890
TC N 26°04'00" W 0.00
4220 7662.714 9289.890
Precision Ratio I: 996592
Length Traversed = 225.24
Length To Close = 0.00
Error in Latitude 0.00
Error in Departure 0.00
Error in Elevation = 0.00
Area = 538.092 Sq. Feet or 0.012 Acres
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
"Sight" Survey 990601-Z-0701 Thursday, August 28, 2008 7:05 am. Pg: I
. Registered to: RODNEEY HANSEN
File Name: K:ICOGO\2007\20714,ASC
Point Direction Distance Northing
Database opened: Thursday, August 28, 2008 6:56 am,
NEW LOT 1 BOUNDARY
Start
4235 7662.604
S 88°44'07" E 110,66
4221 7660.161
S 4°34'19" W 53.88
4242 7606.448
N 88°44'33" W 107,92
4241 7608.817
Raw: 1.3943NE 53,81
TC N 1°39'43" E 53.81
4235 7662.604
TC S rI7'34"W 0.00
4235 7662.604
Precision Ratio = 1: 603239
Length Traversed = 326.27
Length To Close 0,00
Error in Latitude = 0,00
Error in Departure = 0,00
Error in Elevation 0,00
Area = 5879,837 Sq. Feet or 0,]35 Acres
Easting Elevation
9294.889
9405.518
9401.223
9293.329
9294,889
9294.889
0.000
0,000
0,000
0,000
0.000
0.000
"Sight" Survey 990601-Z-0701 Thursday, August 28, 2008 10:44 am. Pg: 1
. Registered to: RODNEEY HANSEN
File Name: K:\COG012007120714.ASC
Point Direction Distance N ortlring
Database opened: Thursday, August 28, 2008 6:56 am.
NEW LOT 2 BOUNDARY
Start
4241 7608.817
S 88°44'33" E 107.92
4242 7606.448
S 4°34'19" W 53.89
4222 7552.736
N 88°45'01" W 105.19
4254 7555.030
Raw: 1.3943NE 53.81
TC N 1°39'43" E 53.81
4241 7608.817
TC S 6°53'IO"W 0.00
4241 7608.817
Precision Ratio 1 :560231
Length Traversed 320.80
Length To Close = 0.00
Error in Latitude 0.00
Error in Departure = 0.00
Error in Elevation 0.00
Area = 5732.634 Sq. Feet or 0.132 Acres
Basting Elevation
9293.329
9401.223
9396.928
9291.768
9293.329
9293.329
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
"::,..,.,,..,
Pleue print or trie.~.Drorm.lfoD e R
Docllment Title(s) (or transactions contain!#lihereU;}, (all areas applicable to your document.!!!!!!! be filled in)
I. 'BE-Uti (A/srt w..M pf fyt~tWIL " ," , ," ,
/'4/ .. .' 3, .. .. ': . .. •. '
Reference Number(s) ofDocuni'ent{assign~d Ilt relelts¢: .. !i .'
Additional ~.f-e.~ence #'s on page __ of d~~iiinent ,.9..~ //:J..lo..·~'6>6,7 .f"'""
Grantor(S) E~"'i\IY as name(s) appear on document."" , .. )'./ ........ : ..
, ..... ,:. ./::: "',.,.
I. C~A-f'!/ I'I-lLi A-C.4 Bf Mi?l{;."/ . ' ""':"'" , .. ,~.", ..
.' "" .' . ,'. .' ....
···'··.f ., .' .. :: . 2. , .'
Adc!JtionaJ,,;;'me.~"on p~ke __ of document, .:, ........••...
"
Gtant~s).Exactly as,.riamii{".).appear on document
.
~ fJ,'" <"JiP&t~ {;,'pi-)j;j£.'j'o;j 1~! '1#6,'.-.,) <.1 lE,e1S u's
. ~. ~ • . ..
2. ::. ~ .. , .. , .. ~ ...... .'
""
.""\ ":, ,
.,' , .
Additional names ,;" p.g~~oldocu;!wnt
Legal deSCriPtiun~~~re~aki~ Leilot, 1>11< plat Or section, to'hj; range) {-L& T ~.:l..d. "'" .... 1;'\ Su.~1t:.. ",.' ••.. WNGit f7tJ () . fJ'EN#;<
VoL I ! e4~ ..... ~~'.'. " .
Additional legal is on page __ ;;f'(\ocU1l)<i~t.· . ., .' .....
'''''.,-' .'
Assesso~s Property Tax ParcellAcco,mt NlIliibe.r: ..... ::
33 J.]ODbl:t ....•. ; ............ i
.[J.Asses~.r,.Tax # not yet assigned .' ....
The AuditorlRecorder will rely on the information pni~g,,4 oIl'iIlis .!brm ..... ·the.Staff.will riot r~.IId.Jhe document
to verify the accuracy or completeness of iIle indexing infonruition.~rovided hiire;n; .,:. /... . ... ,.
"I am signing below and paying an additional $50 recording r';' (8l!"proylded:1n Rt:W 36.1~:tllO a:ad.
referred 10 as an emergency nonstandard document), because Ihis doe.ime~t do.,s liot D1e..t.·nlargID aild .....
formatting reqUi~l Furthermore, 1 hereby understand Ibat the recoril.ing· p.ocesS may-~oJ'er:.up or·· ..
otherwise ObsC:Z' / J:zo
f
thZC original document as a resu~ti::::;:;::~~sting;~~
.. ".... .' .. '.
Note to submitter: Do no!A!!18bove b()r pay additional SSO fee if the document meets margin/formatting req6irem.ints : ..... ::. /'
.......... RELINQ1.JISHMENT OF EASEMENT
.",
!IT lI:m 010W ,o.s81lNGlrON )
hat
.. -" .... :. ",
My commission ""pire~ /i-(~·~/l.,'
" ........ .
,." .::, ....
. ,:
IC1!WfQI~9~:; reet(S§r!:~Iat Deed of nedication :::::::::::::: ::
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Carrie Olson
Hopper, Joe; Paradise, Jayna
10/23/200811:13:15AM
Teets Short Plat Deed of Dedication
Joe, Thanks for letting me know about the hold up. As is my custom of working with both the applicant
and their representives, I am also including a cc: to the owners for their information.
There are no time limits other than the 2-year requirement to record the short plats, which will end on
October 17, 2009, with a possible one-year extension after that. I will proceed with the review process
because we should have comments back within a month or so. By then maybe the contractual issues will
be resolved. If you need to contact me by phone my number is 425-430-7235. Carrie
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 9:46 AM
Carrie,
I apologize we haven't submitted the deed documents yet. We are having some contractual difficulties
with Mr. Teets and have stopped work on his project for the time being. We still intend to submit when
those issues are resolved, but it looks like it may be towards the end of the year before you see something
from us. Let me know if there are any time restraints as to when you need to have those documents, and
if so I will let Mr. Teets know the urgency of getting them submitted.
Thanks, Joe.
Joe Hopper
jhopper@paceng.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Carrie Olson fmailto:COlson@ci.renton.wa.usl
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 9:36 AM
To: Jayna Paradise; Joe Hopper
Subject: Teets Short Plat Deed of Dedication-Second Request
Hi Joe, Just thought I'd remind you that your project submittal dated
September 15th is still on hold pending receipt of the deed documents.
These documents don't have to be signed at this point since we are only reviewing them for legal content.
Please see attachments below and return to my attention. Thanks, Carrie
Sent: Thursday, September 18,200810:14 AM
Joe, Here is the information we discussed this morning regarding the Teets Short Plat submittal. Please
right click on Deed icon and use "open with" MS Office to open the DEED form and use Adobe to open
the partially filled out REETA form. Also, see the instruction info attached. Please submit four copies of
each document as soon as possible to be included with your requested final review submittal. I will place
the review submittal on hold until I receive the deed documents. Also, I am sending comments from
Sonja Fesser to Rodney Hansen for his review. If you have questions, please contact me at 425-430-
7235. Thanks, Carrie Olson
cc: Teets, Denney & Robin
'''I' ,
Return Address:
City Clerk's Office
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, W A 98055
DEED OF DEDICATION
Project File #:
:::::: ::
Property Tax Parcel Number:
Street Intersection:
Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbeJS are on page __ '
Grantor(s): Grantee(s):
1. I. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or full legal must go here. Additional legal on page )
The Grantor. for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s) as
named above. the above described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below.
Approved and Accepted Bv:
Grantor(s): Grantee(s): City of Renton
Mayor
City Clerk
INDIVIDUAL FORM OF STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that [ know or have satisfactory evidence that
Notary Seal must be within box signed this instrument and
acknowledged it to be hislher/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes
mentioned in the instrument.
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Notary (Print)
My appointment expires:
Dated:
HformslxxxFRMI AGREEI FORlVl DEED .DOC\ CDR Page I FORM 04 OOOlfbh
Page.iJ
,'-." ,
Exhibit A
Legal Description
HforrnslxxxFRM/AGREElFORM DEED.DOC\CoR Page 2
Project:
WO#
PID
GRANTOR:
Street:
FORM 04 OOOllbh
" . I
I
HfomlsJxxxFRM! AGREE! FORM DEED .DOC\ CDR
Map Exhibit
Page 3 FORM 04 OOOlfbh
., .
Hfonns!;u;xFRM/AGREEIFORM DEED.DOC\CoR Page 4 FORM 04 OOOlfbh
::::: ::::::::::.:.
~venue
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT Tlis famis}ol).l" r£nip
A..EAEE TYFE OR FRlNT OiAPTER 82.45 RON -OiAPrER 458-Q1A WAC wtuJ ~ bjca:ti9"
THIS AFFIDAVITWIlL NOT EEACCEFTED UNLESSALLAREASON ALL PAGESAREFULLY COMPlETED
o """ to.;f"" ,
(5'et:.:d<.« lat ~fCf 'rsll..dIons) ,
"If' ,
~N~ .~
I~I M<ilirg Aro-a« ~I " OtyfSad.Zip ~,,,,,,,,"p
;
5n:l ell lYop:rly ta: wrr~ 10: 0 Sane as BuyErfQa"1le I'~'"~ ~'.", ,.,.",.",,...-li~ iIiiI9HI vau::(s)
N= 0
Mi'lIi'll AI1t{9l 0
Otyl9ae'Zip 0
Fh:lne No. (Irdldr"{l cre o::dEt 0
lI&e ooa{9l«~: __________________________________________________________________ __
This jropa1y is IoatB:I In
o 0JEdI 00x if!Jf)' cr IhelislEd lUcas a-e berg SE(lrEgaa:l fromalil"QfI" 1U1II.
Lig<l as:riPkn of prop!Ity (if rmre ~ IslB:da:I, )IOU rrey aIatI a9l'pB'ge ihS 10 em p;:ge of the .ffidatit)
II saw l..a1:J i...I9'! ea::e:~:
g1g" ~ a:ttUaa ccd3&
(See IJid d lat p;:g3 fa" il'l!'Crl.l:lia'6)
IslhS ~ ~ fran p-q::e1y Q P'!"dl:PEr
€4_~ RCN (ravcflt crg:nzalO1)7
YES NO
o 0
~.. YES NO
Islhs~c&ig_Sedasfcrailcn:lper~,33RCWi' 0 0
IsltisP'"CJB1Yda:Bfiuja;;<lJTB"Ii.S:!{qsl~famrd 0 0
~aJtL.raI,CTtirrtu~<n::lper~.34?
Isltisp-qu1yrooiyjrg~valBi(J1<1>h8aicap_qu1y 0 0
ru~,26FON?
If ~~OJ'1"lPe.teasirS1u::tEdb3oN.
ff) NJT1CE 0f00NTl~ ~ l..AK) CRaAlENr IJE)
NEWOMIIER(S): Too:rtirue tte CUT81c1e9g-a;cn asfae:t Iat! a
damlc3im asCUTErt I.fe(q:sl ~ faTrl3lifqiaJtu"e, a tinta")
Iem. yw nut aWl Q'I (31 baIoN. Tte ro.rty a:Ee!O" rru:i ItB1 dtamire
if thEllcn:I tra"demooo1irus tJQ..SI1 fyWd will iOOcae bjsgirg b::Ioo.
If V"elon::l rolO"g3" Q.Bifies cr '{OJ rol'd 'M.S'1 uc:cRin..e Ite daSgSiCll
a daSfi!3ion, II 'MIl tererro.ulonj lh3~rg a: crtI~creI Q(es
will te de <rd payaje b{ 1m !Dla-a 1I'a"ltercr ;;f tte time ct Sa (RCIN
84.33.'140 a: RON 64.34.100), Prialosgi~ (3) taON, )OJ mayCCl'iad
yo.r kx:3 carty a!IefU fa: mae iltCll"l"lai01
Ths 1m::! 0 chs 0 cte; nj Q.Blfy fa o:rtirun:e.
DERJTY A~ DATE
(2) NOTICEOFCOMF'tIANCE(HISTQRI(JIRCIIERTy)
NE'N ONNffi(S): Tocutin.e t'j.Eriai ...aIlBiOl csh:toic ~,
fA!Jl (3) baIoN .If tte raN OMB"(s) d::Es rd wi!h tnxnrw, all
ai:iticrel tax caaJcte:::I fU"Url to~ 84.31 RON, sui l:ede
m::! payaje ~ Ite sOlO" atr.niEl'l)' aI. te time Ii ~e.
(3) QWNER(S} SGNATURE
PRINT NAME
II Us all p:rs:ra ~quty (Ia"9tie <rd irt,rgtie) irclu:B;j lm;elll~
"'~
Ifdaimirg iIlecerp;i01, list WAC n.rnte'" ord rEftll"t fa atrrIj:tim
WAC NIl (5edc:n'&tm:t iOl) ______________________ __
Rw3::rJ fa ecerp;i0l
Type d Do.:ure1 ""'.-Q"ca; SelUrg Rica $, ____________________ __
."""" -I"""J ,;-_______ __
EiurnpjOl Oamed (cJ:d.Jj) $; _______________ __
TaoG:tle Sellirg Rica $'-=========== ExeS) T<I'( : sae $_
L"" ,, _________ _
·DElirq..u1 lnlEre:t Sti:te $'-=========== LccaI $_
·DElirq.o1 f"EI'&ty
"""" 'sae Toomcgy Foo $ ________ _
'Affid:Mt R"o::ee:Irg Fee $ ____________________ _
T~ Doo $ ________ __
AMINI MUM OF $10.00 ISDUE IN FEE(~ AND/OR TAX 's:e. INSfFUCTIONS
I CERTIFY UND~ PENALTY OFPER,JJRYTHAT THE FOREGOING lSTRUEANDCQRRECT,
Slgmre Ii Grarta a Grria', Agn; ____________________ _
~(~~)--------------
~&dtyr:jsgirg:
........ Grartea a Grart.'. AginI ________________________ __
~(~~)---------------
cae & city rI!igirg:
Pwjl,lry: Pajuyisad<r:6 C felCJlf Wid! ispriSttle l:J,'ifTlJiSlTTler1ln the saecare::ticrel irltiUicn faal1\3Kil1ll.JT1 tmn rj not rrue1tB1 flveyan ab{
afirEinill iJTNl..rt fixoob(1he a:utd I'd m::reltm five'lhCllB'"d d:::ll<rs I!O.OO],({l), cr bt I:dh i!TVI~ ordfine{RCWgo,2'l.aaJ (len
REV B4COO1a:(a) {Q5~8107} THIS S¥.CE -T~SJRERS USE OI'IILY CCUNTY T~3JFe
"',
· .:.
A REETA fonn is required to be sent with the Deed of Dedication at the time of
recording. Please fill out the Grantor portion of the attached document (1), include tax
parcel numbers (3). brief legal description (4), sign (8), and return to me with the signed
and notarized deed. Don't change or fill in anything else. The City will pay the fees.
page1j
., .'.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
October 19, 2007
Andrea Petzel
Sonja J. Fesser
Teets Short Plat, LUA-07-101-SHPL
Format and Legal Description Review
Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the
following comments:
Comments for the Applicant:
The dedication of land for street purposes on the short plat (the 5' strip adjoining Meadow
Ave N) requires approval by the City Council. Said dedication is achieved via a recorded
City of Renton Dedication Deed document. If the dedication is to be recorded with the
short plat, the dedication process needs to be timed in such a way that Council approval
and all other matters pertaining to the dedication have been addressed and resolved, and
said document is ready to record. The Deed of Dedication document includes both a legal
description exhibit and a map exhibit. The legal description exhibit should be prepared,
stamped, dated and signed by the applicant's surveyor. The surveyor should also prepare
the map exhibit. The first page of said document needs to include an abbreviated legal
description. The dedication process requires an updated title report Plat Certificate
document, dated within 45 days of Council action on said dedication. Talk to the Project
Manager if there are questions or further information is needed.
Note the bearings and dimensions of all sides of the two lots (on the short plat drawing).
Information needed for final short plat approval includes the following:
Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA-07-l Ol-SHPL and
LND-20-0499, respectively, on the drawing in the spaces already provided. The type size used
for the land record number should be smaller than that used for the land use action number.
\H:\Fiie SyslLND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-20 -Short Plats\0499\RV070924.doc
I!Carrie"'oison -RV070924 doc .
. '.
October 26, 2007
Page 2
Show two ties to the City of Renton Survey Control Network The geometry will be checked by
the city when the ties have been provided.
Note what was found when visiting the existing monuments.
Provide short plat and lot closure calculations.
The symbol for what has been, or is to be, set at the corners of the proposed lots, currently noted
in the "LEGEND" block, is not shown on the short plat lots
Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if
any.
Note the relinquishment of all easements for access, light, view and air (to the State of
Washington per Rec. No. 4695952) on the short plat submittal (Rainier Title Plat Certificate,
Order No. 430628, dated August 8, 2007).
If the private garage access easement (to be relinquished) is not released by the time this short
plat is recorded, then retain said reference on the drawing (Rec. No. 9312102007). If said
easement has been released, then remove said reference from the short plat submittal
Note the plat name of the property to the south of the subject parcel (on the drawing).
The ci ty addresses for the proposed lots are: Lot I is 3616 Meadow Ave N, and Lot 2 is 3610
Meadow Ave N. Note said addresses on the short plat drawing in the spaces already provided.
On the final short plat submittal, remove all references to concrete, rackery, topog lines, trees,
concrete slab, utilities facilities and other items not directly impacting the subdivision. These
items are provided only for preliminary short plat approval.
Remove the "CNIL ENGINEER', "SURVEYOR", "DEVELOPER" and "PROJECT DATA"
blocks from the final submittal.
Remove all references to zoning and density.
It appears that Doris Pease is to be included in the one "ACKNOWLEDGMENT" block shown
on the short plat drawing. If she does not sign with Mr. and Mrs. Teets, then another
"ACKNOWLEDGMENT" block is needed.
The "DECLARATION OF COVENANT" block should be removed from the short plat
submittal, if there is no new private easement shared by both of the lots.
Note that if there are easements, restrictive covenants or agreements to others (City of Renton,
etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the short plat. The short
plat drawing and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package.
The recording number(s) for the associated document(s) are to be referenced on the short plat
H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying RecordsILND-20 -Short Plats\0499\RV070924.doc\cor
.'
October 26, 2007
Page 3
"-:::=:::-:---::::"=:: --":-: ' ":: ~-
drawing. Provide spaces for the recording numbers thereof.
Fee Review Comments:
The Fee Review Sheet for this review of the preliminary short plat is provided for your use
and infonnation.
H:\File Sys\LND. Land Subdivision & Surveying RecordslLNO-20 -Short Plats\0499\RV070924.doc\cor
}age31
;.
Return Address: iJA /,
.;If'3? IV7 l;!V-t: Sf:
MI/:&v'k( I !tilt t/
r 7dPrJ
UEVElOP~"" '
CITY dt-', ' .. !
FEB 2 a 1.008
Please print or type informaUon WASHINGTON STATE RECORDER'S Cover Sheet (RCW 6504) 0
Document Title(s) (or transactions contained therein): (all areas applicable to your document must be filled in)
L 'Be U'1 CA/srt vt.t&'f $f f~s£j/ue;-h,
3. 4,
Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released:
Additional reference #'s on page ___ of document 931 ;1../0 ;J, ()O7
Grantor(s) Exa\tly as name(s) appear on document
L CInU.A--t /t1rhL yA-C4RfM£1L
2. ,
Additional names on page ___ of document.
Gran tee( s) Exactly as name( s) appear on document
L b€-AJA)EY T !Lite! /?J61/v ('\ 16eK MJ ~u' -5 T P&f~
2. ,
Additional names on page of document.
Legal description (abbreviated: i.e. lot, block, plat or section, townSj' range) {'
fJ'EN::tf .;( L» T l')" d. ~ t \ \ ~ MNJS 1/<. W N G-Pr f1? r3 tV "
VvL II 6l:~ (ptf-
Additional legal is on page __ of document.
Assess04s Property Tax Parcel/Account Number
33 J-]O()Ia'~ o Assessor Tax # not yet assigned
The AuditorlRecorder will rely on the information provided on this form, The staff will not read the document
to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing information provided hereil),
"I am signing below and paying an additional $50 recording fee,(as provided in RCW 36.18.010 and
referred to as an emergency nonstandard document), because this document does not meet margin and
formatting requirements. Furtbermore, I hereby understand that the recording process may ~over up or
otherwise obscW;a:of the ~ original document as a result of this request."
(,Vf'J /-. . Signature of Requesting Pa rty
Note to submitte .... : Do notA;fn above nor pay additional $50 fee if the document meets margin/formatting requirements
. . ,
"
RELINQUISHMENT OF EASEMENT
For a VALUABLE CONSIDERATION ~t or \~b. is beteh)' a.:kM~.
1:00 Grallt""~) CAlli. A CARl'E.NlER and MlIry·I>. C"rpeme<,lmshftlld and wife,
4 Hereby grants and co""ey~ to D\lIlll}' !. Teets. Robin D. TeW and Doris!. Pease,
their succe&6011l and assigns. a full and <:<lmplete release of the easement for
Garage and Garage Access purposes over the southerly portion of the Grantee's
property lI$ deicribed in Ea!lement reronled under King ('.ounty Recording
Nutttber 9J 121fJ2007.
IN WITN"ESS WHEREOF, THE GRANtOR HAS EXECUTED
TIllS ~AY OF£-e.~ ,2mt
U~ ~~/~C> '~D TV A 1'.""""",
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)!'$
Cooniy or K.\",~ }.
I <ertiry tim! I know QT Imve oati.fac!ory evidence that
Carl A. Carpenter and Mary A. Carpenter are the pel'SDns who appeared
before me, and said persons acknowledged that they signed this instrument
and ackoow1edgJ:: it In be thcir tree and volUlltary act fur the uses and purposes
::onedintw~ment ~' '2;1/ ""N"'ot"""ary""~"'.-,::so-. -7'L;~d::--
4MtliA A. Tervt,:oe'1
Prim Notary's Name T
lo.f ...... ____ ",",,; .. ;_ .. _.t .t'" ........ " ... co ........
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Carrie Olson
Joe Hopper
12/10/2007 9:37:27 AM
Teets Short Plat
Joe, Here is the informtion we discussed this morning regarding the Teets Short Plat submittal. Please
open the REETA form with Adobe to use a partialy filled out form. The deed will be reviewed along with
the short plat drawings. Please submit four copies of each document and of the revised drawings to my
attention. Thanks. Carrie Olson
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
October 19, 2007
Andrea Petzel
Sonja J. Fesser
Teets Short Plat, LUA-07-101-SHPL
Format and Legal Description Review
Dob Mac Onie and T have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the
following comments:
Comments for the Applicant:
The dedication ofland for street purposes on the short plat (the 5' strip adjoining Meadow
Ave N) requires approval by the City Council. Said dedication is achieved via a recorded
City of Renton Dedication Deed document. If the dedication is to be recorded with the
short plat, the dedication process needs to be timed in such a way that Council approval and
all other matters pertaining to the dedication have been addressed and resolved, and said
document is ready to record. The Deed of Dedication document includes both a legal
description exhibit and a map exhibit. The legal description exhibit should be prepared,
stamped, dated and signed by the applicant's surveyor. The surveyor should also prepare
the map exhibit. The first page of said document needs to include an abbreviated legal
description. The dedication process requires an updated title report Plat Certificate
document, dated within 45 days of Council action on said dedication. Talk to the Project
Manager ifthere are questions or further information is needed.
Note the bearings and dimensions of all sides of the two lots (on the short plat drawing).
Information needed for final short plat approval includes the following:
Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA-07-101-SHPL and
LND-20-0499, respectively, on the drawing in the spaces already provided. The type size used
for the land record number should be smaller than that used for the land use action number.
IC,IDOClJME-! ICOlsonV.oCALS-! ITemplgwpnntlRV070924.doc
December 10, 2007
Page 2
Show two ties to the City of Renton Survey Control Network. The geometry will be checked by
the city when the ties have been provided.
Note what was found when visiting the existing monuments.
Provide short plat and lot closure calculations.
The symbol for what has been, or is to be, set at the corners of the proposed lots, currently noted
in the "LEGEND" block, is not shown on the short plat lots
Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if
any.
Note the relinquishment of all easements for access, light, view and air (to the State of
Washington per Rec. No. 4695952) on the short plat submittal (Rainier Title Plat Certificate,
Order No. 430628, dated August 8, 2007).
If the private garage access easement (to be relinquished) is not released by the time this short
plat is recorded, then retain said reference on the drawing (Rec. No. 9312102007). If said
easement has been released, then remove said reference from the short plat submittal
Note the plat name of the property to the south ofthe subject parcel (on the drawing).
The city addresses for the proposed lots are: Lot 1 is 3616 Meadow Ave N, and Lot 2 is 3610
Meadow Ave N. Note said addresses on the short plat drawing in the spaces already provided.
On the final short plat submittal, remove all references to concrete, rockery, topog lines, trees,
concrete slab, utilities facilities and other items not directly impacting the subdivision. These
items are provided only for preliminary short plat approval.
Remove the "CIVIL ENGINEER', "SURVEYOR", "DEVELOPER" and "PROJECT DATA"
blocks from the final submittal.
Remove all references to zoning and density.
It appears that Doris Pease is to be included in the one "ACKNOWLEDGMENT" block shown
on the short plat drawing. If she does not sign with Mr. and Mrs. Teets, then another
"ACKNOWLEDGMENT" block is needed.
The "DEC LARA nON OF COVENANT" block should be removed from the short plat
submittal, ifthere is no new private easement shared by both of the lots.
Note that if there are easements, restrictive covenants or agreements to others (City of Renton,
etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the short plat. The short
plat drawing and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package.
The recording number(s) for the associated document(s) are to be referenced on the short plat
drawing. Provide spaces for the recording numbers thereof.
C:\DOCUME-J \COlson\LOCALS~ I \Tcmp\gwprint\RV070924.doc\msoffice
December 10, 2007
Page 3
Fee Review Comments:
The Fee Review Sheet for this review of the preliminary short plat is provided for your use
and information.
C:\DOCUME-l\COlson\LOCALS-l\Temp\gwprint\RV070924,doc\msoftice
Return Address:
City Clerk's Office
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
DEED OF DEDICATION
Project File #:
Property Tax Parcel Number:
Street Intersection:
Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page __ .
Grantor(s): Grantee(s):
1. 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated orfuillegal must go here. Additional legal on page )
The Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s) as
named above, the above described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below.
Approved and Accepted Bv:
Grantor(s): Grantee( s): City of Renton
Mayor
City Clerk
lNDIVlDUAL FORM OF STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING )
[ certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that
Notary Seal must be within box
signed this instrument and
acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes
mentioned in the instrument.
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Notary (Print)
My appointment expires:
Dated:
Hforms/xxxFRM/AGREE/FORM DEED.DOCI MSOffice Page I FORM 04 OOOllbh
Exhibit A
Legal Description
Hfonns/xxxFRM/AGREEIFORM DEED.DOCI MSOffice Page 2
Project:
IVO#
PID
GRANTOR:
Street:
FORM 04 OOOllbh
Map Exhibit
HfonnslxxxFRMIAGREEIFORM DEED.DOCI MSOffice Page 3 FORM 04 000 I ihh
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT
CHAPTER 82.45 RCW -CHAPTER 45S-61 WAC
This lo!'1ll is yOUT n:~Tlpt
whcli st:lIl1pcd by cashin
FOR t:SE ATCOliKTYT RF."~lJRER·S OFFICE
(Use rOITn No. 84-0001 [I for Reponing Transfers of Controlling Interest ofEnlity UWllclsllip tLl th~ D~p~rtment ofRcl'cnue)
nils AFFIDAVIT WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED CNLESS ALL AREAS 1-7 ARE FULI.V COMPLETE!)
Kame Name City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation
g! ~. Street Street 1055 South Grady Way
City/Statcfl.ip City/State/Zip Renton Wa (8055
ADDRESS TO SEND ALL PROPERTY TAX RELATED CORRESPONDENCE': ALL TAX PARCEL NUMBERS COUNTY
ASSESSED \' ALUE JF TAX EXEMPT
1\'ame Portion of tax ~arcel #(5]
Street (same as Grantor information)
II LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTI' SITUATED IN D UNINCORPORATED _______ .COUNlY al OR rN CITY OF Renton
Street Address (if property is improved): ________________________________________ _
Is tllis property currenlly:
Classified or designated as forest land'!
Chapter 84.33 RCW
YES NO
Classified as currenluse land (open space, faml n _
and agricultural, or timber)'! Chapter 84.34 RCW
Exempt from property tax as a nonprofit IEil IiiIl
organization'! Chapter 84.36 RCW
ScHer'S Exempt Reg. No.
Receiving special valuation as 'historic
property? Chapter 84.26 RCW
Property Type: _land only
D land with previously used building o timber only
Principal Use: o Apt. (4+ unit) o timber 0 agricultural
D other
o land with new building
D laTld with mobile home o buildiTl,g only
o residential
[J commercial/industrial
I (I) NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE CReW 8433 OR RCW 84.34)
new owncr(s) of land that is classifieu or des1b'llated as current use
or forest land wish to continue the classification or designation of such
land, the new owner(s) must sign below. If the uew owner(s) do not desire
to continue such classification or desib'llation, all compensating or
additional tax calculated pursuant to RCW 84.33.120 and 140 or RCW
84.34.108 shall be due and payable by the seller or transferor at the time
of sale. TIle county assessor must detennine if the land transferred
qualifies to continue classification or designation and must so indicate
below. Sib'llatures do not necessarily mean the land will remain in
classification or designation. If it no longer qualifies, it will be removeu
and the compensating taxes will be applied. All new owners must sib'll.
This land o does 0 docs \lot qualify for continuance.
Date ______ _
DEPU'IY ASSESSOR
(2) NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE (Chapter 84.26 RCW)
If the new owner(s) of property with special valuation as historic property
wish to contiuue this special valuation the new owner(s) must sign below.
If the new OWIIer(S) do not desire to continue sHch special valuation, all
additional tax calculated pursuant to Chapter 84.26 RCW. shall be dlle
and payable by the seller or transferor at the tlme of sale.
(J) OWNER(S)SIGNATURE
_ Description of personal property included in gross selling price. both ~ tangible (eg; furniture, equipment. elc.) or 11itall!;lhle (eg; goodWIlL
agreem~nt not to compete, etc.)
If exemption claimed, list WAC number and explanation.
WAC No. (Sec/Sub) .....;4.;.5.;.8-6.:;.;.1:..;A,,-2:..:0..:5 __________ _
Explanation Transfer to government for public purposes
Type of Document Deed of Dedication
Date of Document ___________________ _
Gross Selling Price
Personal Property (deduct)
Taxable Selling Price
0.00
Elc:ciseTax: Slatc $. _____________ _
l.ocal $. ____________ _
Delinquent Interest: State $. _____________ _
Local $. ____________ _
Delinquent Penalty $.------------0-:,.,-
Total Due $. __________ "0,,.0"'-0
• A MINIMUM OF $2.00 IS DU~;~~::~~E"INU FEE AND TAX.
I Certify Under Penalty of Perjury Under TIle Laws of Tile State (] f
Washington That The Foregoing Is Tmc And Correct. (See bnck (Jrthis
fonn).
Sib'llanlre of
GrantorlAg~nt __________________________________________ _
Name (print} ______________________ _
Date and Place of Sih'lling: _________________ _
Signature of
Grantee/Agent -,-:-,-:_,-:--,-:,-:-_______________ _
Name (print) _~K.;.a~t~h~y~K.;.e~o~l~k~e~r.~M=a~yo~r'-_________ _
Date & Place ofSib'lling: Renton
Perjury: Perjury is a class C felony which is punishable by imprisonment in the state correctional institution for ~ maximum tenn of 110t more
than five years, or by a fine in an amollnt fixed by the court of not more than five thousalld dollars ($5.000,00). or by botll imprisonment and
fine (RCW 9A.20.020 (Iq).
REV 84 OOOla (3-18-99) (PD 4-05-00) FOR TREASURER'S USE ONLY [JCOUNTY TREASURER
[JDFPT. OF REVENUE
[jCOUNTY ASSESSOR
ljTAXPAYER
A REETA fonn is required to be sent with the Deed of Dedication at the time of
recording. Please fill out the Grantor portion of the attached document (1), include tax
parcel numbers (3), brief legal description (4), sign (7), and return to me with the signed
deed.
TEETS: )RT PLAT CONDITIONS OF
LUA 07-101
Project Condition Source of
Condition
The applicant shall obtain a demolition Administrator
pennit and all required inspections
completed for the removal of the
existing house and garage prior to the
recording of the short plat.
In order to preserve and protect the one Administrator significant tree during utility and
building constmction the tree shall be
fenced off around the drip line and a
sign posted that the tree is to be
preserved, and the location of the tree
shall be indicated on all utility
construction plan sheets. The fencing
shall be in place prior to the issuance of
any utility construction pennits and
shall remain until the final inspection of
the new house on Lot 2 is complete.
The applicant shall submit a revised, Administrator
detailed landscape plan indicating the
required street trees. The plan is
subject to the review and approval of
the Development Services project
manager and is required prior to the
issuance of the building permits.
The applicant shall pay the required Administrator
Transportation Mitigation Fcc based on
$75.00 per net average daily trip.
The garage access easement (Rec. Administrator
#9312102007) shall be relinquished
prior to recording the short plat.
The applicant shall adhere to the Administrator
recommendations of the geotechnical
report from Geotech Consultants, Inc.
(dated July 27, 2007),
The applicant shall pay a $488,00 Fire Administrator
Mitigation Fec prior to the recording of
the short plat
The project shall be required to comply Administrator
with the Department ofFcology's
Erosion and Sediment Control
Requirements as outlined in Volume II
ofthe 2001 edition of the Stonnwater
Management ManuaL
cc: City of Renton File LUA 07-101
Craig Burnell
Jan lIlian
Rocale Timmons
"'hen Compliance is
Required
Prior to recording
Prior to utility permits
Prior to building pennits
Prior to recording
Prior to recording
Throughout
Prior to Recording
Throughout
'ROYAL
Party l'i otes
Responsible
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
" . ~=~JPACIFIC L-,\JGINEERING DEw,GN, LLC:
CIVIL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS
November 28, 2007
Ms. Andrea Petzel
City of Renton
Development Services
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, W A 98055
RE: Teets Short Plat
LUA 07-101, SHPL-A
Dear Andrea:
PED Job No.: 06089
We have revised the Short Plat drawings for the project referenced above in accordance
with the Short Plat Decision dated October 17,2007. Enclosed for your review, are four
copies of the revised plans. The following outline provides each of the Plat Decision
Conditions exactly as written, along with a narrative response describing how each
comment has been addressed:
Short Plat Decision:
The Teets Short Plat, File No. LUA 07-101, SHPL-A, is approved subject to the following
conditions:
1. The applicant shall obtain a demolition permit and all required inspections
completed for the removal of the existing house and garage prior to the recording
of the short plat.
Response: A demolition permit will be obtained prior to the removal of the
existing structures on site.
2. 1n order to preserve and protect the one significant tree during utility and
building construction the tree shall be fenced off around the drip line and a sign
posted that the tree is to be preserved, and the location of the tree shall be
indicated on all utility construction plan sheets. The fencing shall be in place
prior to the issuance of any utility construction permits and shall remain until the
final inspection of the new house on Lot 2 is complete.
Response: Tree preservation fencing will be installed and maintained around
the significant tree throughout construction until the final inspection ofthe Lot 2
building is complete.
wwvv.paceng.com
15445 53RD AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 1 00, SEATTLE, WA 98188 FAX 206388-1648 PHONE 425251-8811 206431-7970
.,. .
Ms. Andrea Petzel
City of Renton
November 28, 2007
PED #06089
3. The applicant shall submit a revised, detailed landscape plan indicating the
required street trees. The plan is subject to the review and approval of the
Development Services project manager and is required prior to the issuance of
the building permits.
Response: The revised landscape plan is included with this suhmittal.
4. The applicant shall pay the required Transportation Mitigation Fee based on
$75.00 per net average daily trip prior to the recording of the short plat.
Response: The developer will pay the required Transportation Mitigation Fee
as noted above.
5. The garage access easement (Rec. #9312102007) shall be relinquished prior to
recording the short plat.
Response: The garage access easement relinquishment is in the process of
being signed and recorded.
6. The applicant shall adhere to the recommendations of the geotechnical report
from Geotech Consultants, Inc. (dated July 27, 2007).
Response: The developer will adhere to the recommendations of the geotechnical
report.
7. The applicant shall pay a $488.00 Fire Mitigation Fee prior to the recording of
the short plat.
Response: The developer will pay the required Fire Mitigation Fee as noted
above.
8. The project shall be required to comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion
and Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in Volume !I of the 2001 edition
of the Stormwater Management Manual.
Response: The developer will comply with the DOE Erosion Control
requirements a noted above.
Pacific Engineering Design, LLC Page 2 of3
R:106089 Teets Short Piatl08069 Pial Decision Response Letler.doc
,.
Ms. Andrea Petzel
City of Renton
November 28. 2007
PED #06089
I believe that the above responses, together with the enclosed revised plans address all
conditions of approval. If you have questions, comments. or need additional information,
please contact me at your convenience. Thank you.
Sincerely,
,Ju-')1)7r!;/7' )
,j.<iseph M. Hopper, PE
Enc: Revised Landscape Plan
cc: Mr. Darcey Teets
Mr. Denney Teets
Pacific Engineering Design. LLC
R:1060S9 Teets Short PiatlOS069 Plat Decision Response Letter.doc
Page 3 of3
.'
:PACIFIC t:NGINEERING DESIGN,
po --
CIVIL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS
November 28,2007
Ms. Andrea Petzel
City of Renton
Development Services
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
RE: Teets Short Plat
LUA 07-101, SHPL-A
Dear Andrea:
PED Job No.: 06089
We have revised the Short Plat drawings for the project referenced above in accordance
with the Short Plat Decision dated October 17,2007. Enclosed for your review, are four
copies of the revised plans. The following outline provides each of the Plat Decision
Conditions exactly as written, along with a narrative response describing how each
comment has been addressed:
Short Plat Decision:
The Teets Short Plat, File No. LVA 07-101, SHPL-A, is approved subject to the following
conditions:
I. The applicant shall obtain a demolition permit and all required inspections
completed for the removal of the existing house and garage prior to the recording
of the short plat.
Response: A demolition permit will be obtained prior to the removal of the
existing structnres on site.
2, In order to preserve and protect the one significant tree during utility and
building construction the tree shall be fenced oif around the drip line and a sign
posted that the tree is to be preserved, and the location of the tree shall be
indicated on all utility construction plan sheets. The fencing shall be in place
prior to the issuance of any utility construction permits and shall remain until the
final inspection of the new house on Lot 2 is complete,
Response: Tree preservation fencing will be installed and maintained around
the significant tree throughout construction until the final inspection of the Lot 2
building is complete.
www.paceng.com
15445 53RD AVENUE SOUTH, 8UITE100,SEATTLE. WA 98188 FAX20638B-1648 PHONE 425 251-8811 206431-7876
Ms, Andrea Petzel
City of Renton
November 28, 2007
PED #06089
3, The applicant shall submit a revised, detailed landscape plan indicating the
required street trees, The plan is subject to the review and approval of the
Development Services project manager and is required prior to the issuance of
the building permits,
Response: The revised landscape plan is included with this submittal.
4, The applicant shall pay the required Transportation Mitigation Fee based on
$ 75,00 per net average daily trip prior to the recording of the short plat,
Response: The developer will pay the required Transportation Mitigation Fee
as noted above.
5, The garage access easement (Rec, #9312102007) shall be relinquished prior to
recording the short plat,
Response: The garage access easement relinquishment is in the process of
being signed and recorded.
6, The applicant shall adhere to the recommendations of the geotechnical report
from Geotech Consultants, Inc, (dated July 27, 2007),
Response: The developer will adhere to the recommendations of the geotechnical
report.
7, The applicant shall pay a $488,00 Fire Mitigation Fee prior to the recording of
the short plat,
Response: The developer will pay the required Fire Mitigation Fee as noted
above.
8. The project shall be required to comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion
and Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in Volume II o[the 2001 edition
of/he Stormwater Management Manual,
Response: The developer will comply with the DOE Erosion Control
requirements a noted above.
Pacific Engineering Design. LLC Page 2 of3
R: 106089 Teels Shari Pial108069 Pial Decision Response Letter,doc
r
Ms. Andrea Petzel
City of Reman
November 28, 2007
PED #06089
I believe that the above responses, together with the enclosed revised plans address all
conditions of approval. If you have questions, comments, or need additional information,
please contact me at your convenience. Thank you.
Enc: Revised Landscape Plan
cc: Mr. Darcey Teets
Mr. Denney Teets
Pacific Engineering Design. LLC
R: 106089 Teets Short PiatlO8069 Plat Decision Response Letter.doc
Page 3 0[3
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING / BUILDING / PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
Date: November 2, 2007
To: City Clerk's Office
From: Stacy Tucker
Subject: Land Use File Closeout
Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City
Clerk's Office.
Project Name:
LUA (file) Number:
Cross-References:
AKA's:
Project Manager:
Acceptance Date:
Applicant:
Owner:
Contact:
PID Number:
ERC Decision Date:
ERC Appeal Date:
Administrative Approval:
Appeal Period Ends:
Public Hearing Date:
Date Appealed to HEX:
By Whom:
HEX Decision:
Date Appealed to Council:
By Whom:
Council Decision:
Mylar Recording Number:
Teets Short Plat
LUA-07-101, SHPL-A
Andrea Petzel
September 21, 2007
Darcey Teets
Denney & Robin Teets; Doris J. Pease
Joe Hopper, P.E. -Pacific Engineering Design, LLC
3342700617
October 17, 2007
October 31, 2007
Date:
Date:
Project Description: Application for administrative short plat approval for a 2-lot subdivision in
the R-8 zone. Density would be 7.5 dwelling units/acre. The existing home would be demolished.
Proposed lot sizes would be 5,880 sq. ft. and 5,733 sq. ft. Both new lots would have direct access
to Meadow Ave. N via private driveways. There are two significant trees onsite, and no critical
areas are present.
Location: 3612 Meadow Avenue N
Comments:
PARTIES OF RECORD
TEETS SHORT PLAT
LUA07-101, SHPL-A
Joe Hopper, P.E.
Pacific Engineering Design, LLC
15445 53rd Avenue S ste: #100
Seattle, WA 98188
tel: (206) 431-7970
eml: jhopper@paceng.com
(contact)
Darcey Teets
2838 109th Avenue SE
Bellevue, WA 98004
tel: (206) 391-1500
(applicant)
Updated: 09/21/07
Denney & Robin Teats
3 S Hollow Road
Dix Hills, NY 11746
tel: (601) 667-9276
(owner)
Doris J. Pease
16205 SE 9th Street
Bellevue, WA 98008
tel: (425) 503-7444
(owner)
(Page 1 of 1)
November 2, 2007
Joe Hopper, P.E.
Pacific Engineering Design, LLC
15445 5yd Avenue S #100
Seattle, W A 98188
SUBJECT: Teets Short Plat
LUA07-101, SHPL-A
Dear Mr. Hopper:
CIT1 :lFRENTON
Planning/BuildinglPublic Works Department
Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator
This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended on October 31, 2007 for the
Administrative Short Plat approval. No appeals were filed. This decision is final and you may
proceed with the next step of the short plat process. The enclosed handout, titled "Short Plat
Recording," provides detailed information for this process.
The advisory notes and conditions listed in the City of Renton Report & Decision dated October
17, 2007 must be satisfied before the short plat can be recorded. If you have any questions
regarding the report and decision issued for this short plat proposal, please call me at (425) 430-
7270. For questions regarding the recording process for the short plat, as well as for submitting
revised plans, you may contact Carrie Olson at (425) 430-7235.
Sincerely,
f2k~t4(
Andrea Petzel
ASSOCiate Planner
Enclosure(s)
cc: Denney & Robin Teets, Doris Pease I Owners
Darcey Teets / Applicant
------------1-O-55-S~~-uili--G-rn-d-y-W-a-y---Re-n-to-n-,W--M-hm-g-ID-n--98-0-57-------------~
6iC) This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30%post consumer"
AHEAD OF THE CURVE
CITY (' RENTON
Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator
October 29, 2007
Joe Hopper, P.E.
Pacific Engineering Design, LLC
15445 53'd Avenue S #100
Seattle, W A 98188
Subject: Comments from Property Services -Teets Short Plat
City of Renton File LUA 07-101, SHPL-A
Dear Mr. Hopper:
As per the notation in the Report and Decision dated October 16,2007, enclosed are the
comments from the City's Property Services Department. These comments will guide you in the
preparation of the short plat for recording.
If you have any questions feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7270.
/.&incere1y ,
/
I I /-.
' .. i rj./.0
;' j , ./ . /':, ,:.1 /.j--~)
L L{:,-/~.,(\(~,c.v;:~'
Andrea Petzel, Planrler
Development Services Division
Enclosure
cc: City of Renton File LUA07-101
------l-O-SS-S-o-uth-. -G-lad-y-W-a-y--R-e-n-to-n,-w-as-hin-gto~n-98~O-57------~ * This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% postconsume~ AHEAD OF THE CURVE
.~
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
October 19, 2007
Andrea Petzel
Sonja J. Fesser ~
Teets Short Plat, LUA-07-101-SHPL
Format and Legal Description Review
Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the
following comments:
Comments for the Applicant:
The dedication of land for street purposes on the short plat (the 5' strip adjoining Meadow
Ave N) requires approval by the City CounciL Said dedication is achieved via a recorded
City of Renton Dedication Deed document If the dedication is to be recorded with the
short plat, the dedication process needs to be timed in such a way that Council approval and
all other matters pertaining to the dedication have been addressed and resol ved, and said
document is ready to record. The Deed of Dedication document includes both a legal
description exhibit and a map exhibit The legal description exhibit should be prepared,
stamped, dated and signed by the applicant's surveyor. The surveyor should also prepare
the map exhibit The first page of said document needs to include an abbreviated legal
description. The dedication process requires an updated title report Plat Certificate
document, dated within 45 days of Council action on said dedication. Talk to the Project
Manager if there are questions or further information is needed.
Note the bearings and dimensions of all sides of the two lots (on the short plat drawing).
Information needed for final short plat approval includes the following:
Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA-07-101-SHPL and
LND-20-0499, respectively, on the drawing in the spaces already provided. The type size used
for the land record number should be smaller than that used for the land use action number.
\H:\File Sys.\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records.\LND-20 -Short Plats\0499\RV070924.doc
October 26, 2007
Page 2
Show two ties to the City of Renton Survey Control Network. The geometry will be checked by
the city when the ties have been provided.
Note what was found when visiting the existing monuments.
Provide short plat and lot closure calculations.
The symbol for what has been, or is to be, set at the comers of the proposed lots, currently noted
in the "LEGEND" block, is not shown on the short plat lots
Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if
any.
Note the relinquishment of all easements for access, light, view and air (to the State of
Washington per Rec. No. 4695952) on the short plat submittal (Rainier Title Plat Certificate,
Order No. 430628, dated August 8, 2007).
If the private garage access easement (to be relinquished) is not released by the time this short
plat is recorded, then retain said reference on the drawing (Rec. No. 9312102007). If said
easement has been released, then remove said reference from the short plat submittal
Note the plat name of the property to the south of the subject parcel (on the drawing).
The city addresses for the proposed lots are: Lot 1 is 3616 Meadow Ave N, and Lot 2 is 3610
Meadow Ave N. Note said addresses on the short plat drawing in the spaces already provided.
On the final short plat submittal, remove all references to concrete, rockery, topog lines, trees,
concrete slab, utilities facilities and other items not directly impacting the subdivision. These
items are provided only for preliminary short plat approval.
Remove the "CIVIL ENGINEER', "SURVEYOR", "DEVELOPER" and "PROJECT DATA"
blocks from the final submittal.
Remove all references to zoning and density.
It appears that Doris Pease is to be included in the one "ACKNOWLEDGMENT" block shown
on the short plat drawing. If she does not sign with Mr. and Mrs. Teets, then another
"ACKNOWLEDGMENT" block is needed.
The "DECLARATION OF COVENANT" block should be removed from the short plat
submittal, if there is no new private easement shared by both of the lots.
Note that if there are easements, restrictive covenants or agreements to others (City of Renton,
etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the short plat. The short
plat drawing and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package.
The recording number(s) for the associated document(s) are to be referenced on the short plat
drawing. Provide spaces for the recording numbers thereof.
H:\File Sys\LND -L'lnd Subdivision & Surveying Reeords\LND-20 -Short Plats\0499\RV070924.doe\cor
October 26, 2007
Page 3
Fee Review Comments:
The Fee Review Sheet for this review of the preliminary short plat is provided for your use
and information.
H:\File Sys\LND -land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-20 -Short Plats\0499\RV070924.doc\cor
PROPERTY SER lS FEE REVIEW FOR SUBDIVISIONS 007 --4L_ ~_~
RECEIVED FROM ___ ~ __ ~ ___ ~ __
(datc)
JOB ADDRESS: i'!Ic;.l:2: .W!=:ATXl'NA'Ie; W. ___ ______ n _ WO# i1eoe
NATURE OF WORK: 2~~ :")I-!ol=rf PI ~( I bel B I'II-IOBT -P.J.&r.J.n_ LND # ;>0 -0499 _____ _
X PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION Y LONG PLAT, NEED MORE INFORMATION: --LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SHORT PLAT, BINDING SITE PLAN, ETC. PID #'s VICINrry MAP
FINAL REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION, THIS REVIEW REPLACES SQUARE FOOTAGE OTHER
PRELIMINARY FEE REVIEW DATED FRONT FOOTAGE
SUBJECT PROPERTY PARENT PID#..3a.4e'10 '"-CG17 X NEW KING CO. TAX ACCT.#(s) are required when
assigned by King County.
It is the intent of this development fee analYSIS to put the developer/owner on notice, that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon
development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the constmction permit is issued to install the on-site and
off-site improvements (i.e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SOC fees will be based on current City ordinances and
determineJ by the applicable Utility Section.
Please note flIat flIese fees are subject to change wilhout notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit
application.
The existing house on SP Lot # ___ , addressed as has not previously paid
~~_~ SDC fees, due to connection to City utilities prior to existance of SDC fee Ord. SP Lot#" \vill be
subject to futnre SDC fees if triggering mechanisms are touched within current City Ordinances.
We understand that this subdivision is in the preliminary stage and that we will have the opportunity to review it again before recordation.
The followin~ quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/wpermit fees or the cost of water meters.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS
Latecomer A~reement (pvt) WATER
Latecomer A~reement (pvt) W ASTEW ATER
Latecomer A~reement (pvt) OTHER
Special Assessment District/WATER
Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER
Joint Use Agreement (METRO)
Local Improvement District
Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP, CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION
FUTURE OBLIGATIONS
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -WATER .. Estimated
.. Pd Prevo --Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) .. Never Pd
Single familv residential $1,956/unit x
Mobile home dwelling unit $1,956/unit in park
Apartment, Condo $1,I74/unit not in CD or COR zones x
Commercial/Industrial, $0.273/sq. ft. of property (not less than $1,956.00) x
Boeing, by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter (2,800 GPM threshold)
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE ~ W ASTEW A TER -. Estimated
.. Pd Prev. .. Partiallv Pd (Ltd Exemption) .. Never Pd
Sin~le familY residential $1,017/unit x
Mobile home dwelline: unit $1,0I7/unit x
Apartment, Condo $610/unit not in CD or COR zones x
Commercial/Industrial $0.142/sq. ft. of property x(not less !han $1,017.00)
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -SURF ACEW ATER .. Estimated
.. Pd Prevo .. Partiallv Pd (Ltd Exem---.ption) .. Never Pd
Sinele famiIv residential and mobile home dwelling unit $759/unit x
AU other properties $0.265/sq rt of new impervious area of property x
(not less than $759.00)
# OF UNITS/
SQ. FfG.
~
I PRELIMINARY TOTAL
~/IrnJ~ }#tr . (~f(IDCJr ) 9/~Or
$
OR FEE
-0-
-0
-0-
/-0-
/
/-0
•
SDCFEE
~ IOI /.<"ln
'jj '" 0 • 0 " -.J ,
"
Signatu~'()Rev· illg Authonty DiE
.. *If subject property is within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. ~ 0 < e-o • Square footage figures are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are subject to change.
" 0 Current City SDC fee charges apply to ___________________ _
EFFECTIVE January 2, 2006
City of Renton Department of Planning! Building! Public Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: B·A .. L; S\/(s COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 5, 2007
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-101, SHPL-A J DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 21, 2007
APPLICANT: Darcey Teets PROJECT MANAGER: Andrea Petzel
PROJECT TITLE: Teets Short Plat PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian
SITE AREA: 12,151 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A
LOCATION: 3612 Meadow Avenue N WORK ORDER NO: 77808
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Application for administrative short plat approval for a 2-lot subdivision in the R-8 zone. Density would
be 7,5 dwelling units/acre. The existing home would be demolished. Proposed lot sizes would be 5,880 sq, ft. and 5,733 sq. ft. Both
new lots would have direct access to Meadow Ave. N via private driveways. There are two significant trees onsite, and no critical
areas are present.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e,g, Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housinq
Air Aesthetics
Water Liqht/G/are
Plants Recreation
Land/Shorelme Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy! Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10.000 Feet
14.000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C, CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REPORT
&
DECISION
A.
REPORT DA TE.
Project Name:
Applicant/ Contact:
File Number:
Project Description:
Project Location:
Project Location Map
City of Renton
Department of Planning / Building / Public Works
ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT
SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Oelober 17, 2007
Teets Short Plat
Applicant: Darcey Teets
2838 109'h Avenue SE
Bellevue, W A 98004
LUA 07-101, SHPL-A
Contact: Joe Hopper, P.E.
Pacific En.,gineering Design, LLC
1544553' Avenue, S. SUIte lOa
Seattle, W A 98188
Project Manager: Andrea Petzel, Planner
Application for administrative short plat approval for a 2-1o! subdivision in the R-8 zone.
Density would be 7.4 dwelling units/acre. The existing home would be demolished.
Proposed lot sizes would be 5,880 SF. and 5,733 SF. Both new lots would have direct
access to Meadow Avenue North via private driveways. The applicant would be required
to dedicate 5 feet of width along the street frontage for improvements. There are two
significant trees onsite, and no critical areas are present.
3612 Meadow Avenue North
REPORT City of Renton
& Department of Planning / Building / Public Works
DECISION ADMINISTRA TIVE SHORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION
A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
REPORTDATE: October 17. 2007
Project Name: Teets Short Plat
Applicant/ Contact: Aff:licant: Darcey Teets Contact: Joe Hopper, P.E.
2 8 lO9'h Avenue SE Pacific Ew>ineering Design, LLC
Bellevue, W A 98004 1544553' Avenue, S. Smte 100
Seattle, WA 98188
File Number: LUA 07-101, SHPL-A Project Manager: Andrea Petzel, Planner
Project Description: Application for administrative short plat approval for a 2-10t subdivision in the R-8 zone.
Density would be 7.4 dwelling units/acre. The existing home would be demolished.
Proposed lot sizes would be 5,880 SF. and 5,733 SF. Both new lots would have direct
access to Meadow Avenue North via private driveways. The applicant would be required
to dedicate 5 feet of width along the street frontage for improvements. There are two
signifIcant trees onsite, and no critical areas are present.
Project Location: 3612 Meadow Avenue North
Project Location Map
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
TEE1:) SHORT PLAT, PROJECT LUA 07-10f, SIIPL-A
REPORT AlVD DEC/SIO/V' D(llnl October 17, 1007
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Owners of Record:
2. Zoning Designation:
Denney and Robin Teets
3 S. Hollow Road
Dix Hills, NY 11746
Residential -8 dulac (R-8)
Doris J. Pease
16205 SE 9'h Street
Bellevue, W A 9800S
3. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Residential Single Family (RSF)
4. Existing Site Use: Existing single family residence to remain
5. Neighborhood Characteristics:
6.
7.
North: Single Family Residential (R-S zone)
East: Interstate Highway 405
South: Single Family Residential (R-8 zone)
West: Single Family Residential (R-S zone)
AC'('ess:
Site Area:
Driveway access off of Meadow Avenue North
12,151 SF (0.2S acres)
C. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND:
Annexation
Comprehensive Plan
Zoning
D. PUBLIC SERVICES:
1. Utilities:
Land Use File No.
NIA
N/A
"IA
Ordinance No.
IS04
5099
5100
Water: There is an existing 12-inch watermain in Meadow Avenue N.
Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch sanitary sewer main in Meadow Avenue N.
Surface Water/Storm Water: There are no storm facilities at this site.
2. Streets: There is no sidewalk, curb, or gutter fronting the project site.
3. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department
E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE:
1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts
Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts
Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table
Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards
2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards
Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations
3. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards
Section 4-6-060: Street Standards
4. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations
Section 4-7 -070: Detailed Procedures for Short Subdivisions
Page 2
Date
12/S/59
11/1/04
11/1/04
Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Pian-General Requirements and
Minimum Standards
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
TEETS SHORT PLAT, PROJECT LLiA 07·l()I, SHPL-A
REPORT Ai'i'D DECISION' Dated October 17, 2007
Section 4-7-150: Streets-General Requirements and Minimum Standards
Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots-General Requirements and Minimum Standards
4. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria
F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
I. Land Use Element -Residential Single Family
2. Community Design Element
G. DEPARTMENTANALYSIS:
1. Project Description/Background
Page3
The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 0.2S-acre (12.151 SF) parcel zoned Residential-S (R-8)
dwelling units per acre into two lots. The property is located east side of Meadow Avenue North. just
north of North 36'h Street. The existing single-family residence will be removed.
Proposed net lot sizes are as follows:
Lot I: 5.880 SF
Lot 2: 5.733 SF
There are no street improvements and an approximate 539 SF dedication would be required for
installation of half-street improvements. Subtracting that from the gross area of the plat. the proposal for
two new lots would arrive at a density of7.4 dwelling units per net acre (dulac). There are no critical
areas onsite.
Access to both proposed lots would be via separate private driveways from Meadow Avenue North. The
site is vegetated with grass and shrubs. as well as two significant trees.
2. Environmental Review
Except when located on lands covered by water or sensitive areas, short plats are exempt from SEPA
Environmental Review pursuant to WAC 197-II-SOO(6)(a).
3. Compliance with ERC Conditions
N/A
4. Staff Review Comments
Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identifY and
address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file,
and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and
the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report.
5. Consistency Short Plat Criteria
Approval of a plat is based upon several factors. The following short plat criteria have been established
to assist decision-makers in the review of the plat:
a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Desigllatioll
The site is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use
Map. Lands in the RSF designation are intended for use as quality residential detached
development organized into neighborhoods at urban densities. It is intended that larger
subdivision, infill development, and rehabilitation of existing housing be carefully designed
to enhance and improve the quality of single-family living environments. The proposal is
City of Renton P/H/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
TEETS SHORT PLAT, PROJECT LUA 07-IOI! SHPL-A
REPORT AIVD DEClSIDlV Dated October 17, 2007 Page 4
b)
consistent wIth the following Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Community Design
Element policies:
Policy LU-147. Net development densities shouldfall within a range of4.0 to 8.0 dwelling
units per acre in Residential Single Family neighborhoods.
The proposed project for two lots would arrive at a net density of7.4 dwelling units per net
acre, which is within the density range permitted.
Policy LU-14S. A minimum lot size of 5,000 SF should be allowed on in-jill parcels of less
than one acre (43,560 sq.fl.) in single-family designations. Allow a reduction on lot size to
4,500 SF on parcels greater than one acre to create an incentive for aggregation of land.
The minimum lot size is not intended to set the standardfor density in the designation, but to
provide flexibility in subdivision/plat design and facilitate development within the allowed
density range.
Both proposed lots exceed the minimum lot size of 5,000 SF.
Policy LU-152. Single-family lot size, lot width, setbacks, and impervious surface should be
sufficient to allow private open space, landscaping to provide buffers/privacy without
extensive fencing, and sufficient area for maintenance activities.
The proposed new lots would meet the required lot size, width, and setbacks to create
sufficient front, rear, and side yard areas.
Policy LU-154. Interpret development standards to support new plats and infill project
designs incorporating street locations, lot configurations, and building envelopes that
address privacy and quality of life for existing residents.
The proposed lots are would be oriented such that all of the lots would have direct access to
a public right-of-way. The two proposed lots would be oriented to face Meadow Avenue
Nm·th, thus matching the houses on the abutting lots. Approval ofthis application would not
decrease the quality of life for residents in the immediate vicinity.
Policy CD-12. In fill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be
encouraged ill order to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to
neighborhoods.
The proposed short plat would subdivide an existing parcel into two lots. A new residence
could be constructed on proposed Lot 2, updating the housing stock in the existing
neighborhood.
Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation
The subject site is designated R-S on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The proposed
development would allow for the future construction of one new single-family dwelling unit.
The allowed density range in the R-S zone is a minimum of 4.0 to a maximum of S.O
dwelling units per acre. After subtracting approximately 539 SF for right-of-way dedication,
the net lot area is 0.27 acres. The proposal for two lots on 0.27 acres arrives at a density of
7.4 dwelling units per acre, which falls within the permitted density range for the R-8 zone.
The allowed building lot coverage for lots over 5,000 SF in size in the R-8 zone is 35 percent
or 2,500 SF, whichever is greater. The existing house on Lot I does not comply with setback
requirements and will be removed. Staff recommends as a condition of short plat that the
applicant obtain a demolition permit and all required inspections completed for the removal
of the existing house and garage prior to the recording of the final plat. Both lots comply
with the lot size requirements.
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
TEETS SHORT PLAT, PROJECT LVA 07-101, SHPL-A
REPORT AND DECISION Dated Octoher 17, 2()()7 Page 5
c)
d)
The required setbacks in the R-8 zone are as follows: front yard is 15 feet for the primary
structure and 20 feet for an attached garage; interior side yard is 5 feet; side yard along a
stteet is 15 feet for the primary structure and 20 feet for an attached garage; and the rear yard
is 20 feet. Both lots provide adequate room [or structures that would comply with setback
requirements.
The parking regulations require that detached or semi-attached dwellings provide a minimum
of 2 off-street parking spaces. As proposed, each lot would have adequate area to provide
two off-street parking spaces. Compliance with the parking requirements will be verified at
the time of building permit review.
Commullity Assets
The site is vegetated primarily with shrubs, groundcover and a total of two significant trees,
The regulations regarding tree protection/retention require that trees on developable lots be
mamtained to the maximum extent feasible, and they permit the City to require the
replacement of trees that would implement the intent of the regulations. The Development
Services Director has made a determination that to comply with these requirements, 25
percent of all protected trees shall be retained or replaced. Of the two existing trees, one, the
33-inch hemlock in the southwest comer of proposed Lot 1 is proposed to remain. This
results in a retention rate of 50 percent and complies with the Director's determination and
City regulations, In order to preserve and protect the tree during utility and building
construction, staff recommends as condition of approval that the tree be fenced off around
the drip line and a sign posted that the tree is to be preserved.
The City's landscaping regulations require the installation of landscaping within the public
right-of-way. The minimum amount of landscaping required for sites abutting a non-arterial
public street is 5 feet, provided that ifthere is additional undeveloped right-of-way in excess
of 5 feet, this shall also be landscaped. A determination has been made that if no additional
area is available within thc public right-of-way due to required improvements, the 5-foot
landscaped strip may be located within private property abutting the public right-of~way.
The landscaping proposed shall either consist of drought resistant vegetation or shall be
irrigated appropriately. In addition, the applicant will be required to plant two ornamental
trees, a minimum caliper of 1-112 inches (deciduous) or 6 -8 feet in height (conifer), within
the IS-foot front yard setback area for the proposed lots. Existing landscaping may be used
to augment the required landscaping.
A conceptual landscape plan was submitted with the application. The plan indicates two
street trees on Lot I and only one tree on Lot 2, As a condition of approval staff
recommends that a revised, detailed landscape plan with the required street trees, All
landscaping shall be installed prior to final inspection of the buildings. Native or drought
tolerant species should be used, or an irrigation plan is required, If applicable, fence details
should be included in the landscape plan. Allowable fence height is 48" in the front yard
(42" in clear vision areas), and 72" in the rear and side yards. Side yards begin fifteen feet
back from the front property line.
Compliallce with Subdivision Regulatiolls
Streets: No new public streets would be created as part of the proposed short plat.
Meadow Avenue North is classified as a Collector Street on the City's Arterial Street Map,
There are no existing frontage improvements along the parcel's Meadow Avenue North
street frontage. The applicant is required to dedicate five feet in width (approximately 539
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administratiye Land Use Action
TEETS SHORT PLAT, PROJECT LlJ.·j 07-101. SHPL-A
REPORT AlVD DEC/SIOlV DUt'ed October J 7, lOf)? Page 6
e)
SF) for half-street improvements along the parcel's frontage in order to install curb, gutter
and sidewalk.
The proposed short plat is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street
system. In order to mitigate transportation impacts, staff recommends a condition of
approval be placed on the project requiring a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00
per net new average daily trip attributed to the project. One new lot (credit given for the
existing residence) is expected to generate approximately 9.57 new average weekday trips.
The fee for the proposed short plat is estimated at $717.75 ($75.00 x 9.57 trips x I lot ~
S717.75) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat.
All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding
Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all
existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground.
Blocks: No new blocks will be created as part of the proposed short plat.
Lots: The size, shape, orientation, and arrangement of the proposed lots comply with the
requirements ofthe Subdivision Regulations and the development standards of the R-8 zone
and allow for reasonable infill of developable land. Both lots are rectangular in shape and
front Meadow Avenue North. As demonstrated in the table below, all lots meet the
requirements for minimum lot size depth, and width.
Lot Size Depth Width
5,000 SF minimum 50 feet required 65 feet required
Lot 1 5,880 SF 107.9 feet 53.8 feet
Lot 2 5,733 SF 105.2 feet 53.8 feet
Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries
Access: Each lot would have direct access to a public right-of-way via single-family
residential driveways. There is an existing garage access easement on proposed Lot 2 (Rec.
# 9312102007) that the applicant proposes to relinquish. Because any new structure would
be unable to meet setback requirements on this lot with the easement still in place, staff
recommends as a condition of approval that the easement be relinquished prior to recording
the short plat.
Topography: Both proposed lots are relatively level; however, there is a significant grade
change of approximately 13 feet between Lots I and 2, with an existing retaining wall. In
order to address the grade change the applicant submitted a geotechnical report from
Geotech Consultants, Inc. (dated July 27, 2007). Both lots will be graded so that each lot has
a somewhat flat grade; the southern lot will be higher than the northern not, which is
consistent with existing conditions.
The report found no groundwater seepage or unusual soil conditions. In order to protect the
integrity of the future homes, staff recommends adhering to the recommendations made in
the geotechnical report. Because the applicant has not decided on the amount of grading that
will be done to level the site, it should be noted that if more than 500 cubic yards of fill is
moved, Environmental Review (SEPA) will be required.
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
TEETS SHORT PLAT, PROJECT LlIA 07-101, SHPL-A
REPORT A/,liD DEC/SIOIV Daled October 17, 2007 Page 7
1)
Relationship to Existiflg Uses: The properties surrounding the subject site are single-family
residences and are designated R-8 on the City's zoning map. The proposal is similar to
existing development pattems in the area and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and
Zoning Code, which encourage residential infill development.
Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness)
Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to
fumish services to the proposed development, subject to the condition that the applicant
provide Code required improvements and fees. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per
new single-family lot with credit given for the existing single-family residence, is
recommended in order to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to City emergency
services. The fee is estimated at $488.00 ($488.00 x 1 new lot = $488.00) and is payable
prior to the recording of the short plat. Street addresses shall be visible from a public street.
Schools: According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton
Land Use Element (January 16, 1992), the City of Renton has a student generation factor of
0.44 students per single-family residential dwelling. Based on the student generation factor,
the proposed short plat would result in 0.44 additional students (0.44 X 1 lot = 0.44) to the
local schools. It is anticipated that the Renton School District can accommodate any
additional students generated by this proposal at the following schools: Kennydale
Elementary, McKnight Middle School and Hazen High School.
Surface Water: The runoff from the new lot must use infiltration per design by a
professional engineer, or be tightlined into the storm drainage system or other options as
listed in, and in accordance, with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual.
Infiltration is allowed if the soils are acceptable.
The Surface Water System Development charges are required, and based on a rate of
$759.00 per new single-family lot (estimated total of $759.00 with credit for the existing lot).
Payment of this fee will be required prior to issuance of utility construction permit.
A temporary erosion control plan will be required and shall be installed and maintained to
the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration
of the project. This includes installing a silt fence along the perimeter of the site that is to be
disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated. This will
be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as
building construction. Due to the potential for erosion to occur during project construction,
staffrecommends as a condition of approval that the project be required to comply with the
Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in
Volume II of the 2001 edition of the Storm water Management Manual.
Water: This project is required to provide separate domestic water service stubs for the new
lots prior to recording the short plat. New water service stubs must be installed prior to
recording of the short plat. Water System Development charges are based on a rate of
$1,956 per new single-family lot (estimated total of $1 ,956.00 with credit for the existing
lot). Payment of fees is required prior to issuance of utility construction permit.
All plats are required by City Code to provide a fire hydrant with a minimum fire flow
requirement of 1,000 GPM within 300 feet of any proposed single-family structure. If the
proposed single-family structures exceed 3,600 SF, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500
GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure.
Any existing hydrant counted as fire protection will require installation of a "storz" quick
disconnect fitting ifnot already in place. It appears an existing hydrant at the corner ofN.
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrath:e Land t:sc Action
TEETS SHORT PIA T, PROJECT LUA 07-10/, SHPL-A
REPORT AND Dl::ClSION Dated October 17, 2007 Page H
36 th and Meadow Avenue may be within 300 feet. The engineer is required to show location
of all existing hydrants on plan sheets. A new hydrant may be required.
Sewer: Installation of individual side sewers by the developer is required prior to recording
the short plat; dual side sewers are not allowed. The minimum slope for side sewers is 2%.
Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges are based on a rate of $1,017.00 per new
single-family lot (estimated total of$1 ,017.00 with credit for the existing lot). Payment of
this fee will be required prior to issuance of utility construction permits, and prior to
recording the short plat.
H. FINDINGS:
Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following:
1. Application: The applicant's short plat application complies with the requirements for
information for short plat review. The applicant's short plat plan and other project drawings are
contained within the ofticialland use file.
3. Comprehellsive Plall: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
designations of the Residential Single Family (RSF) land use designation.
4. Zoning: The proposal as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development
standards of the R-8 zoning designation, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval
are complied with.
5. Subdivisioll Regulations: The proposal complies with the requirements established by the
City's Subdivision Regulations provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with.
6. Existing Land Uses: The short plat is consistent with development and uses surrounding the
subject site, including: North: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8); East: Interstate Highway
405 South: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8); and West: Residential Single Family (zoned
R-8).
7. System Development Charges: A Water System Development Charge, a Surface Water System
Development Charge and a Sewer System Development Charge, at the current applicable rates,
will be required for the each new Single-family residence as part of the construction permit.
8. Public Utilities: The applicant will be required to install individual sewer and water stubs to
serve the new lots. In addition, installation of a fire hydrant may be required.
l. CONCLUSIONS:
1. The subject site is located in the Residential Single Family (RSF) comprehensive plan designation
and complies with the goals and policies established with this designation.
2. The subject site is located in the R-8 zoning designation and complies with the zoning and
development standards established with this designation provided the applicant complies with City
Code and conditions of approval.
3. The proposed two lot short plat complies with the subdivision regulations as established by City
Code and state law provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with.
4. The proposed two lot short plat complies with the street standards as established by City Code,
provided the project complies with all advisory notes and conditions of approval contained herein.
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
TEET.\' SHORT PLAT, PROJECT LUA 07~IOl, SHPL-A
REPORT AI\iD DECISION Datt'd October 17, Z007
J. DECISION:
The Teets Short Plat, File No. LUA 07-101, SHPL-A, is approved subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall obtain a demolition permit and all required inspections completed for the
removal of the existing house and garage prior to the recording of the short plat.
Page 9
2. In order to preserve and protect the one significant tree during utility and building construction the
tree shall be fenced off around the drip line and a sign posted that the tree is to be preserved, and the
location of the tree shall be indicated on all utility construction plan sheets. The fencing shall be in
place prior to the issuance of any utility construction permits and shall remain until the final
inspection of the new house on Lot 2 is complete.
3. The applicant shall submit a revised, detailed landscape plan indicating the required street trees. The
plan is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services project manager and is
required prior to the issuance of the building permits.
4. The applicant shall pay the required Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net average
daily trip prior to the recording of the short plat.
5. The garage access easement (Rec. #9312102007) shall be relinquished prior to recording the short
plat.
6. The applicant shall adhere to the recommendations of the geotechnical report from Geotech
Consultants, Inc. (dated July 27,2007).
7. The applicant shall pay a $488.00 Fire Mitigation Fee prior to the recording of the short plat.
8. The project shall be required to comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment
Control Requirements as outlined in Volume II of the 2001 edition of the Stormwater Management
Manual.
DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION:
TRANSMITTED this 161
;' dayafOctober, 20U7 to the Applicant/Owner/Contact:
Applicant Darcey Teets
2838 l09 lh Avenue SE
Bellevue, W A 98004
Owner: Denney and Robin Teets
3 S. Hollow Road
Dix Hills, NY 11746
Contact: Joe Hopper, P.E.
Pacific En}inccrin g Design, LLC
1544553' Avenue, S. Suite 100
Owner: Doris J. Pease
16205 SE 9'" Street
Bellevue, W A 98008
TRANSMITTFD this J 61h day of October, 2007 to the Parties of Record.
There are no partics of record.
~ Decision Date
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land L;se Action
TEETS SHORT PLAT, PROJECT LUA 07-10/, SHPL-A
REPORT AND f)tXISIOlV Dated October 17, 2007
TRANSMITTED this 16rh day a/October, 2007 to thefoflm~'illg:
Larry Meckling, Building OfficIal
Bob Van Horne, Deputy Fire Chief
~cil Watts, Development Services Director
Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager
Jan Conklin
Carrie Olson
Renton Reporter
Lund Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration
The administrative land use decision will become tlnal if the decision is not appealed within 14 days ofthe
effective date of decision. An appeal of the decision must be tiled within the 14-day appeal period (RCW
43.2LC.075(3); WAC 197-11-680).
Page 10
RECONSIDERATION. Within 14 days ofthe effective date ofthe decision, any party may request that a
decision on a short plat be reopened by the Administrator. The Administrator may modify his decision if material
evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he tlnds there was misrepresentation
of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator tlnds insuftlcient evidence to amend the
original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further
action must tile a formal appeal within the following appeal time frame.
APPEAL. This administrative land use decision will become tinal if not appealed in writing to the
Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on OCTOBER 31,2007. City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-
8-110 governs appeals to the Examiner. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained
from the Renton City Clerk's Omce, (425) 430-6510. Appeals must be tiled in writing, together with the
required $75.00 application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA
98055.
EXPIR4.TlON DATE: The Short Plat approval will expire two (2) years from the date of approval. An
extension may be requested pursuant to RMC section 4-7 -080.M.
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Vse Action
TEETS SHORT PLA1~ PROJECT LlIA 07-10/, SHPL-A
REPORT AND D£C1SIOl\r Dated October J 7,1007
ADVISORY NOn'S TO APPLICANT
Page 11
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because
these notes are provided as in/ormation only, they are not subject to the appeal process/or the land use actions.
Planning
1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise
2.
approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the
approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received.
A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted at the time of building permit application. The landscape plan will include
ornamental trees in the front yard of each lot and the 5' foot landscape strip.
3. Ifmore than 500 cubic yards offill is moved, Environmental Review (SEPA) will be required.
Propelty Services
1. To be sent under separate cover.
Fire
1. A fire hydrant with 1,000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-family strucrnres. If the building
square footage exceeds 3,600 sq. ft. in area (including garage), the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and
requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the struchrres. The applicant should note that the fire flow available to the site is
1,000 GPM, therefore no residences over 3,600 SF in area can be permitted on the subject site due to fhe limited fire
flow available.
2. All building addresses shall be visible from, or posted at, the public street.
3. Any existing hydrant counted as fire protection will require installation of a "storz" quick disconnect fitting if not already
in place. It appears an existing hydrant at the comer ofN. 36'" and Meadow may be within 300 feet. The engineer is
required to show location of all existing hydrants. A new hydrant may be required.
Plan Review -Sewer
1. Sanitary Sewer System Development Charge is $1,017.00 per new single-family lot. Payment of this fee will be required
prior to issuance of utility construction permit.
2. Separate sewer stubs are required for each ne\v lot prior to recording of the short plat.
3. Minimum slope for side sewers shall be 2%. Dual side sewers are not allowed,
Plan Review -Surface Water
1. The Surface Water System Development Charges are based on a rate of $759.00 per new single-family lot. Payment of
this fee will be required prior to the issuance of a utility construction permit.
2. Roof drains shall be tightlined to the storm system whenever feasible.
3. A conceprnal drainage plan and narrative is required. This project is exempt from detention and water quality per the
1990 KCSWM.
4. A temporary erosion control plan will be required and shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the
representative of the Development Services Division for the dmation of the project.
Plan Review -Streets/Transportation.
1. Half street improvements inc hiding sidewalk, curb, and gutter~ paving and storm drainage are required to be installed
fronting the site in Meadow Ave N. Applicant may submit a request to Public Works to pay a fee in lieu of installing
these improvements.
2. Applicant will bc required to dedicate five feet of right-of-way fronting the site in Meadow Ave N. Existing right of way
widlh is 40 feet. Minimum right of way width is fifty feet. It is shown on the plans.
3. Street lighting is not required for a two lot short plat
4. Applicant will be required to comply with the City of Renton's Trench Restoration and Street Overlay Requirements.
5. A u·affic control plan, approved by the City will be required for any construction impacting the City's right of way.
6. Maximum driveway slope is 15%.
Miscellaneous
1. Separate permits and fees for side sewer connections, water meters, and stonn drainage connections are required.
2. Applicant shall be responsible for securing all necessary easements for utilities.
3. Proposed new rockeries or retaining walls to be constructed that are greater than four feet in height (from bottom of
footing to top of wall) will be require a separate building permit for strucrnral review. A geotechnical report is required
with the submittal.
4. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding Ordinance. [fthree or more
poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground.
CDR
St
0<:;' ~
<[
U
CA
CA
.~ ;:§ ~§. R-8
00
I
R-8:: rY
N 38th
R-8
N 37th
N 36tli St
R-8 N 35th St R~8
lj/R-8N 34th St R-'-83
N .33td.PIR-8/
Iv 331 d 3 t R-S /
R-S/
R-S N 31st 3t R-S /
P-
St ~
R-8
N 34th st
R-8
N 32nd St.
R-8
J~~=lER-S N 30th St R-Sffiij r-~CN--J
II~~==I/ R -8· N 29th St R-E t----,
N 2tlth l"l R-S / ~~
~ ZONING o = TIICIINlCAL BBRVICES
-----RentDn Cit, Llmif41
R
CN
o 200 .00 C4
1,4.800
32 T24N R5E W
-)NING MAP BO-K
9829383 ~~ '8S" 45B6:'~7~
25 T24N R4E 30 T24N RSE 19 T24N ASt=: 2~ T24N A5E '27T24N RSE 26 T24N ~5E
74W
81
26 T24N R4E
81
IC1
35 T24N R4£
. 455W )457 i 458 . .....•... 460 ... 464:
C2 C3/C4~C5CS =C7
36 T24N R4E 31 T24N A5~(_;:-3~-~24N ~5E--:---'~'--3-~N F.i.E--~".+3a:'~<lJ';t~ 35 ~4N ASE
94W
, {l.T23N R5E
306 ~
ID1
2 T23N R4E
307 ,,8G8 '309
D3 \04
5'~23N R5E
3Q§_~ 80&! 807
4 T23N R5E - 3 T23N ASE r: 2 T23N R5E "
3~6 : ,
",-!
132 $"" 326 i'i{3p I 328 370 810 -8[11
I .. ,.. .-:e.. ·rn F1\'v~~ r3F4 F5 ~rre-Lr'
4 T23N -~4~ ,-\ '13;-T23N R4E 18 T23N R5E 17 T23N A5E 16 T23N RSE '1kT2st.J R5E :. 14 T23N RSE
334 --:-\335 336 337 .. 371 .. 815l·· 816
<31 '(32 I G3G4~~--LrG&-G7
3T23NR41: 24T23NR4E 19T23NR5E 20T23NRSE' 21T23~ 22T23NR5E 23T23NR5E 34J 600 601;.£7·· 602 .. .... 820 821
" 1 ~h "'-HI: 2 H· 3 ..... l-aJA
I 'I r1" ..
2,s-T23!W R4E _ ,/. 30 T23N R5E -~29 23N RSE 28 T23N R5E
344
ttl H5
.
HS··H7
27 T23N R5E 26 T23N ASS: ---25
605 825 826 •
1 . 8
15 IS 17
33T23N R& 34 T23N R5E 35 T23N R5E
632 833 e
JS J7
22N R4E 1 T22N R4E 4 122N A5E 5 T22N R5E 3 T22N R5E 2 T22N R5E
[A 1 Y~l
6 T22N R5E
RESIDENTIAL
~ Resource Conservation
~ Residential 1 dulac
~ ReBwentilll " dulac
~ Residential 8 dulac
~ Residential Manufactu~ed HomeR
I R-IO I Residential 10 dulac
I R-141 Residential 14 dulac
I R",-FI Reeidential Multl-FemHy
I RM-T I Residential Multi-Family Traditional
I RM-U I Reaidential Multi-Family Urban Center"
Printed by Print & Mail SeRVices, City of Renton
MIXED USE CENTER
~ Center Vill6.8e
Iuc-NII Urban Center -North 1
IUC-N21 Urban Center -North 2
~ Center Downtown.-
~ Commercial/Office/Residential
COMMERCiaL
~ Commercial Arterial·
~ Commercial Office"
~ Commercial Nei,hbl>rhl>od
INpUSTRIAL
~ InduBlrisl -HeaV)' o Industrial -Medium o Industrial -Light
(P) Publicly owned
____ Renton City Jjroi18
_"_. __ AdjB.cent City Umits
_ Bl>ok Pages Boundary
KROLL PAGE
• May include O .. erlay Distric.t.&. S~e Appendix
maps. For additional relUlations m Overlay
Distrlc18. please Ree Rye 4-3.
PAGE# INDEX
SECT'TOWtN'IANGE
SHORT PLAT NO.
r
PORTION OF THE S. E. 1/4, N. W. 1/4, SECTION 32, TWP. 24 N., RGE. 5 E., lI:M. LUA-XX-XXX-SHPL
um-lX-XDJ:
~ KING COtINTY. If'A8HlNGft)N
LAJ<E
WASHINGTON
•
CERTIFICATE
I (WE) tIED'!' C(RTfY TH,I,T I ..... ('11£ ARE) '!HE OIlWER(S)
IN Ft[ 5IYPL.E Of THE I.J,N[) HERE8~ PI,.lTlEO IN THIS 910111
~,.
~N~ "~~DSEP~,,\:H~§ftf' AND IW't
ACKNOWLEDGWENT
STAlE Of WA5HINUTON)
"' COUNlY Of KING )
ON '!HIS 0"''' PERSONAUk -:;~: sgc:~ ~E"~"'"""''''''')',"'''''''''''''~"'= THE FCR£1XlING INSTRUfojENT, lIND ACKNOWUDDED 1I1Al SAIl lHSlIIUIIIEHT TO
lIE THE rltEE ~ WLUNTARY ACT AHO DEED OF THE SIIlD I'O!SOH(S), fOR
'll£ !,IstS AND ~P05(S THEREIN 1lA!H1I0NED. AND ON OATH ST ... lED T11Al
THEY 'II£R£ AUlHOIIIZW TO EXECUTE THE 5,1,10 lHSTRUW£NT.
1lI\Oi UI'IID£R MT HANO AND SEAL THS _ DAY Of 2001.
NOTARY IiiJ8IJC IN IHJ fOR tilE stAn
Of WAStlHGTOH RESIDING AT
APPROVAlS
CITY OF RENTON
ElWIWED AND ~ THIS __ 0 ... ,. OF ____ 2007.
-i\iii,jIHJSTltATOR Of PLA~"G/llUILD"G/PUklC '/IOiij(S
KING COUNTY
[XAIoIINE!J AND APPIIO'IED lliIS __ O"y Of ____ =.
DEPAA'lMENT Of AsSi:Sswairs -IXPARlWENT 01' ASS£SSr.IENTS
ICING COUloflY ,o,$$($$OR DEPUTY KING COUNTY ASSESSCfI
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PlR RNNIER nll..E COMPANY. E4STSlDE 11M UNIT, JltPOIiIT ORO£R No. ~141
DllTED f,lJl;ILISl D. 2006.
lR4eT 122 OF" C,D. ttl..l.WoW's LAK.E w.o.sHNGTON ~ OF EDEN ~ TO SEltTTLE
No.2. AS PlR PLA1 f!£CDROED IN VOW..: II Of PLATS., PAQC 114, RECORDS Of KlN(l.
COUNTY foi.A)IlIIR;
£XC£P1 ~T POATION LYlNO WITHIN s(OOr.ItWIY ST ... TE ItIGttWAY NUMB£A 2-k
SIT\.IIoTE IN "!HI: ~ Of IONC. STATE OF" WASHNGlQIoI.
~ I '"' 1 ... OJ 1
:00 I ~ 1
8 I'" 1 r:l 15 1
::E '" 81
20' I W I #0\
.;J
LOT 1
1 LOT2
~. LOT 121
m·1 ,.
<j>-'
InT AREAS
LOT 1 MIlO s.r. OR o.a ...... '"/-
LOT 1 !>,7J! s.r. OR O.U ... ." +-/-
!>' 'tOW O£OICAliON Me !or. OR 0.01 "'Co +/-
.~, 101,1,1.._
Of' PROPOSED PUlT 12,151 s.r. OR 0.28 ""=-+/-
DECLARATION OF COVENANT
~" ~"
THE (W;£II Of' lHE t.ANJ D&lACED M1tIN THS SHORT PLItT. IN REllII'tN
!'OR TIt( BENEFl1 TO ACCR\.I: /lIOM THS SUilDM5ICIIi, BY _ HEREON
OOVENANlS AND _us TO CON""Y THE IIENEFICIAL IN'IEREST III THE NEW
EASDl[NT 5ttOIWI CiII THS SHORT PLItT TO AN'" NIl) Itll. F1JlUIIE
PI.IRCHfoS(RS OF" THE lOTS, OR or ANT SUBDMSIONS lHEREOf. lHlS
~T SttIoU _ \IIIlH 1M[ LAND AS stID'MoI CiII TttIS SHOAT PLItT.
RJ';CORpmrS cBRTIfK'!ATR
I
I
I
I
I
I
0'
i -$-
1" = 30'
30' 60' -NfoI) 181.1191 BEAAlI<IIl
\<ER11CAL DltWIl IS Nlto,o 1~
SITE: ADOIIESS 3612 OI£,\OOW ItVl: N.,
RENTON. ..... MOM
DItIGI"""-ToUt PAACEL , ~27O()e17
----------f-----LEGEND
SS _ SANlT ... RY SEII£R
so .. STORII $EWER
Il _ o...s UN[
L()
71 -,
014'-OIiUttW PO'IO: lINE
W _ ...... T£RIJI<IE
I> -QI.S VItl.YE
II' _Wlt1UVItl.>E
mI -WitTER WEYER
tf .. FIRE tt'ltlR1tN1
• .. CArat SItSIN o -1U.NHW: -0 _ UTLlT't POlE o -UGIIT f'()$f tt _ GU1' ANCHOR
~.-I[J .. POWER VltUlT/THANSI'CRIER
m .. lElLfTV P[II. e .. PARKI,... METER
T TO BE R£i.JNQUISHEI) r em tsM"
--------
• .. SEC1ION CORNER I .. QUARTER OORNER e .. fl«>. WON, IN CASE
o _ fIiD. PROP. COR. AS HOlD)
• _ SET 1/1" lR. W/CAP 1114&4
(r;:QII) .. em' Of IIDITON
(R) __ I!ECORO
I
I
I
CIVIL ENGINEER:
~Ef~ DESIGN, Ll.C
...... HI8111 Pt/OIIC!(2aa)
4Jf_n11l FAX:(2tNI)
-,~
~~~~~_FAX:
---------)------ZQtIING: ~-II
NEW LOT ADDRISSES
MEADOW liVE 1'1, RENlON. WA 9lI0:I(I
MEADOW It~ N, RENlON. WA 9_
SUR"I:Y IEETS OR EXCEIDS n-t: IIl!:OJIRDIIENTS
Of W#;; 3.l2-1»-0II0.
ECIJIP\IENT IJS[I), ~. T01 .... STATION.
SI.IIIIIU ILTJIOO: F1ELJ) 'lRAo,£RSE.
RELAlI'.t: POSIllON.O.l. -rr::uR.\NCE 01 SET CCIRNEJIIS: +/-0.1'
TEETS SHORT PLAT
DOISlT't PElMTED: II DU/:t';
DENSiTY PROI'OS£D: 7.~ %A<:.
PRCFOSED HW8£R OF LO ,f' Jl,-_~~"~.~.~_ .. ,
BENCH IIARK
~ DA1UW: ""'00 aa
BOtCH WARKl mY OF RENlON BENCH WMK , 2100
I'M). " STANON'ICI USOS IDle IU.RK BRASS DI!J( ~G~~Y-il':r~~~
(.V> IOJSIHQ OM W. SIDE OF LJ( WI. 1IL'oO.
EltVAlION _ 28.11 fEET
P1IIP.dID B't.
-~'"
LATEST!t['Ot$IOH: 05/14/07
!UpmymrR cpmnCATB _)
TttIS ..... P CQltR[Cl\. Y IIP'lII[:sI!HlS ... SJI!\I£Y MAtl£ IlY r.I£ OR U~
IN al!tCYlOll 1H ~_"lH '»1£ 1I£0I,I,IIIIEIiENTS 01 lHE SI.IIMY RECOftDIHCltCT,ltT·1Ht·A~CI".':7 ;.~
fllLD FOR RECDNl lHlS __ D ... .,. OF 20_ AT
------N. IN IIOOIt ___ ~ ____ U P.o.cE ___ _
S.E. 1/4, N ..... 1/4, SEC. 32, TWP. 24 N., RGE. 5 E., "".IL
CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON A AT 'JI1E REQUEST 01' RODNEY C, IiAHSEN.
'~'~~7.:J0!-J'-:":.:';.<. ";~,--,.""' ..
,:",:~~t( h N_ , '. Ifit,,'1E "10. tl444 _'''' UT. 01' ItECOROS
G::f. ~:.: .. ~'~ ~~!. ~-~;
CITY OF RENTON FILE No. W-,-
OWN BY; PJC DATE: 5/14/07 I JOB NO. 20714
CHKD BY: RGH SCALE: ,"",20' SHEET , OF 1
HANSEN SURVEYING
lAND SURVEYORS. CONSUlTANTS
11420 IIBlH "''wE. S.£., RENTON. WA 98058
lEI.: 425-2:»-&+40 fAX: 42!.-2M-02fIB
,
I
I , ,
I
!
=---liLii ~----
1 \tld HlOHS S133.1
z o
F z
W >-W
De
~:5 WZI
>-0.
z
:5
"-
'" z
F z
:5
"-
! •
III
~ !Ii -
hi 'I '" lit;
~. :~'
~:
",!"
. J •.•.
~" " .' ~,!
;
{:--. ~ .,
,-,,~:,
c ~', .
'" :t;':,\
J~; · ..... ·1
'" ~ ..... ~
~
ui
I/)
a:
z
;lj
t-=
c.j
'" ~
~
CD
..f -~
~
..f -~
III
w
j!:
LL
0
Z
0 ~
2
-.
I
~
._--
--
il
-
il
1 --
I
I
I
1 --
~
.
" . .;-~i~t_'
''-''::oF.
"~,,, ....... ,',
:'j"l( .. :'
"''"''''"; • <,t.'-.
_I:
9OV-1
If
'----
" '. if':;
-~~~ ______ ~~ __ ---=-__________ i0' I:~
-l -----~,-
I
, ",' I,
"", I',>
...:.' •
," L] ,. c~ ~ >"" ,~: ::-:~.
,. ',< -
• ~ ;: y
,
/, '~:~~J':i:
. .,.., , ,
"
'.~ .
_ ..... )
,~-:::, .'
.z:
1
'I
l ----
--
----
8lIl\!J. . 3tJ!UUl1[d
pw '1Iu31fA!:J
:JTI 'u>l!S"O
:3uu~~ul~U3
::'YPRd
~ ! . ~i Ul ~d ~, r ~ nil rll
i ~!!!: it I I~ ~ ~: ~
8
I T""" ~ o.
0...1
! I ! In I~ I IH I;
!H & n fi
I ~ S ~ . ~
1_
-li--·--j-----1-_·_[ r-
City a nton Department of Planning I Building I Pu Yorks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: il1J1Le COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 5, 2007
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-101, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: SEPT
APPLICANT: Darcey Teets PROJECT MANAGER: "drea'Petzel /~
PROJECT TITLE: Teets Short Plat PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian
SITE AREA: 12,151 square feet BUILDING AREA jgross): N/A 10:
LOCATION: 3612 Meadow Avenue N I WORK ORDER NO: 77808
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Application for administrative short plat approval for a 2-lot subdivision in the R-8 zone, Density would
be 7.5 dwelling units/acre, The existing home would be demolished. Proposed lot sizes would be 5,880 sq. ft. and 5,733 sq. ft. Both
new lots would have direct access to Meadow Ave. N via private driveways. There are two significant trees onsite, and no critical
areas are present.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable Mo,. Element of the Probable ProbabJe More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water Light/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utifities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services ---Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservarion
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14.000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is e ed to pro erly assess this proposal.
IIJ-9-o'1
Date
City 0 nton Department of Planning I Building I Pu. . larks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 5, 2007
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-101, SHPL-A ' DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 21,2007
APPLICANT: Darcey Teets PROJECT MANAGER: Andrea Petzel
PROJECT TITLE: Teets Short Plat PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian
C'.!, J
Q .: (. r
SITE AREA: 12,151 square feet BUILDING AREA (qross): N/A
LOCATION: 3612 Meadow Avenue N I WORK ORDER NO: 77808
;)I:.r £ I I..'J~ I
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Application for administrative short plat approval for a 2-lot subdivision in the ~(i)Iil\\lIt9IQ.W,ld
be 7.5 dwelling units/acre. The existing home would be demolished. Proposed lot sizes would be 5,880 sq. ft. and 5,733 sq. ft. Both
new lots would have direct access to Meadow Ave. N via private driveways. There are two significant trees onsite, and no critical
areas are present.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment MinoT Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water Li htlG/are
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transoortation
EnVJ{onmental Health Public Services
Energy! Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14.000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Signature of Director or Auth Date
City a .nton Department of Planning I Building I Pub, larks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P(VK.s COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 5, 2007
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-101, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 21, 2007
APPLICANT: Darcey Teets PROJECT MANAGER: Andrea Petzel
PROJECT TITLE: Teets Short Plat PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian
SITE AREA: 12,151 square feet BUILDING AREA (woss): N/A
LOCATION: 3612 Meadow Avenue N I WORK ORDER NO: 77808
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Application for administrative short plat approval for a 2-lot subdivision in the R-8 zone. Density would
be 7.5 dwelling units/acre. The existing home would be demolished. Proposed lot sizes would be 5,880 sq. ft. and 5,733 sq. ft. Both
new lots would have direct access to Meadow Ave. N via private driveways. There are two significant trees onsite, and no critical
areas are present.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e,g, Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Eal1h Housin<
Air
Water
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use
~on
Animals
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/
Natural Resources
A:~~nFPPf
,; nnn <"of
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C, CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expeJ1ise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areasw~:~assessthisproposal.
v~( ..
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date j
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
FIRE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
September 26, 2007
Andres Petzel, Associate Planner
Camille Walls, Acting Assistant Fire Marshal
Teets Short Plat -3612 Meadow Ave N
Fire Department Comments:
L A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-
family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the
minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of
the structure.
2. A fire mitigation fee of$488.00 is required for all new single-family structures.
3. Fire department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the
building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20 feet in width with a turning radius of 45
feet outside and 25 feet inside.
4. All building addresses shall be visible from or posted at the public street.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
c;\documents and settings\cwalls\desktop\plat-2007\teets short plat.doc
1 Cily 'nlon Department of Planning! Building! p, Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: r I r-c.-COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 5, 2007
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-101, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 21,2007
APPLICANT: Darcey Teets PROJECT MANAGER: Andrea Petz€i'------: '.-
PROJECT TITLE: Teets Short Plat PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian
SITE AREA: 12,151 square feet BUILDING AREA (Qross): NIA
LOCATION: 3612 Meadow Avenue N I WORK ORDER NO: 77808 6t,.. 2 1 2007
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Application for administrative short plat approval for a 2-lot subdivisicm in the-R.f\~t?FI!l:,~QeASit)L.wQlJld
be 7,5 dwelling units/acre. The existing home would be demolished. Proposed lot sizes would be 5,880 sq. It. ana 5',733' sq. ft. Both
new lots would have direct access to Meadow Ave. N via private driveways. There are two signtiicanl.i:reeS bnsite, and no 'critical areas are present. ---- -___ I
A. ENVIRONMENTAL tMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable Mo," Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water Light/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energyl Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airporl Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C, CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
-4 r::2«a C4-cdd &171. OM t?0
We have reviewed this application wUh particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
ar1 where ad~iti~nal information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
{'1it2~iJC(/ tV/( -Udz../ -0//;;
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
September 24, 2007
Andrea Petzel
Jan Illian x 7216
TEETS SHORT PLAT
3612 -Meadow Ave N.
LUA 07-101
I have reviewed the application for this short plat located 3612 -Meadow Ave N. and have the following
comments:
EXISTING CONDITIONS
WATER
SEWER
STORM
STREET
There is an existing l2-inch water main fronting the site in Meadow Ave N. The main is located
along the west side of the road. See City asbuilt water drawing W27-0456. Available fire flow
exceeds 3,000 gpm. Static pressure in the area is approximately 70 psi. The proposed project is
located in the 320 Water Pressure Zone and is outside an AqUIfer Protection Zone.
There is an existing 8-inch sewer main fronting the site in Meadow Ave N.
There are no storm improvements fronting the site in Meadow Ave N.
There is no sidewalk, curb, and gutter fronting the site in Meadow Ave N.
CODE REOUIREMENTS
WATER
1. Water System Development Charges are based on a rate of $1,956 per new single-family lot. Fees based on
the site plan are $1,956.00. Credit is given for the existing home. Payment of this fee is required prior to
issuance of utility construction permit.
2. Fire flow requirement for single-family residences is 1,000 gpm. A hydrant is required within 300 feet of the
furthest stru<:ture. If new residences exceed 3,600 square feet (including garage), fire flow increases to 1,500
gpm and two hydrants will be required.
3. Any existing hydrant counted as fire protection will require installation of a "storz" quick disconnect fitting if
not already in place. It appears an existing hydrant at the comer of N. 36'h and Meadow may be within 300
feet. The engineer is required to show location of all existing hydrants. A new hydrant may be required.
4. All short plats shall provide a separate water service stub to each building lot prior to recording of the plat.
Separate permits for water meters will be required.
SANITARY SEWER
1. Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges are based on a rate of $1,017.00 per new single-family lot.
Total sewer fees based On the site plan are $1,017.00. Credit is given for the existing home if connected to
sewer. Payment of this fee is required prior to issuance of utility construction permit.
2. Separate sewer stubs are required to be provided to each new lot prior to recording of the short plat.
Teets Shl)r! Plat
Page 2 of 2
Septembt:r 24, 2007
3. MInimum slope for side sewers shall be 2%. Dual side sewers are not allowed.
SURFACE WATER
1. The Surface Water System Development Charges are based on a rate of $759.00 per new single-family lot.
Estimated fces based on the site plan is $759.00. Payment of this fee is required prior to issuance of utility
construction permit.
2. Roof drains shall be tightlined to the storm system whenever feasible. Infiltration trenches are allowed if soils
are acceptable.
3. A conceptual drainage plan and narrative is required. This project is exempt from detention and water quality
per the 1990 KCSWM.
4. A temporary erosion control plan will be required and shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of
the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project.
TRANSPORT A TlON
I. Half street improvements including sidewalk, curb, and gutter, paving and storm drainage are required to be
installed fronting the site in Meadow Ave N. Applicant may submit a request to Public Works to pay a fee in
lieu of installing these improvements.
2. Applicant will be required to dedicate five feet of right-of-way fronting the site in Meadow Ave N. Existing
right of way width is 40 feet. Minimum right of way width is fifty feet. It is shown on the plans.
3. Street lighting is not required for a two lot short plat
4. Applicant will be required to comply with the City of Renton's Trench Restoration and Street Overlay
Requirements.
5. A traffic control plan, approved by the City will be required for any construction impacting the City's right of
way.
6. Maximum driveway slope is 15%.
MISCELLANEOUS
1. Separate permits and fees for side sewer connections, water meters, and storm drainage connections are
required.
2. Applicant shall he responsible for securing all necessary easements for utilities.
3. Proposed new rockeries or retaining walls to be constructed that are greater than four feet in height (from
bottom of footing to top of wall) will be require a separate building permit for structural review. A
geotechnical report is required with the submittal.
4. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding Ordinance. If three
or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be
placed underground.
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS
1. Traffic mitigation fee for each new single-family residence is $717.75. The rate is based on 9.57 trips x $75 x
I new lot. Total fee is $717.75. This is payable prior to recording of the short plat.
2. Staff recommends a condition to require this project to design and comply with Department of Ecology's
Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in Volume II of the 200 I Stormwater Management
Manual.
cc: Kayren Kittrick
PROPERTY SF ICES FEE REVIEW FOR SUBDIVISIOI o. 2007 --"4=<)~~~
RECEIVED FROM
(date)
JOB ADDRESS:.---aa.JJi~J\,I~~__ ___ WO#'1~_oa. ___ ~ __ ._. _____ _
NATURE OF WORK: C-Lc:!j" :">HOBT PI ~ I SE-j '8~BL:~L~r:l__ LND #. eo -0499 _ .___ __
X PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION Y LONG PLAT. NEED Mc)RE INFORMATION: .. LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SnORT PLAT, BINDING SITE PLAN, ETC. PID #'s VICINITY MAP
FINAL REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION, THIS REVIEW REPLACES SQUARE FOOTAGE OTHER
PRELIMINARY FEE REVIEW DATED FRONT FOOTAGE
SUBJECT PROPERTY PARENT PID#.a~'70·0Gq X NEW KING CO. TAX ACCT.#(s) are required when
assigned by King County.
I[ is the iotem of this development fce analysis to put the developer/owner on notice, that the fees Quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon
development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may he due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on~site and
off-site improvemeJlt.~ (i.e. underground utilities. street improvements. etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and
determined by the applicable Utility Section.
Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permi[/Construction Permit
application.
The existing house on SP Lot # ___ , addressed as has not previously paid
---;-,---:-:~ SDC fees, due to connection to City utilities prior to existance of SDC fee Ord. SP Lot# will be
SUbject to future SDC fees if triggering mechanisms are touched within current City Ordinances.
We understand that this subdivision is in the preliminary stage and that we will have the opportunity to review it again before recordation.
The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE
Latecomer Agreement (pvt) WATER -0-
Latecomer Agreement (pvt) W ASTEW ATER -0
Latecomer Agreement (pvt) OTHER -0-
L
Special Assessment District/WATER /-0-
/
/
Special Assessment District/W ASTEW ATER /-0
Joint Use Agreement (METRO) -
Local Improvement District • -
Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP, CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION -
FUTURE OBLIGATIONS -
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -WATER .. Estimated # OF UNITSI SOC FEE
Pd Prevo .. PartiaHy I'd (Ltd Exemption) .. Never Pd SQ.FTG.
Single familv residential $1,956/unit x .i $I,q,56.ot
Mobile home dweHing unit $1,956/unit in park
Apartment, Condo $1,174/unit not in CD or COR zones x
Commercial/Industrial, $0.273/sq. ft. of property (not less than $1,956.00) x
Boeing, by Special Agreemenu'Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter (2,800 aPM threshold)
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -W ASTEW ATER" Estimated
Pd Prevo .. PartiaHy I'd (Ltd Exemption) Never Pd
Single family residential $1,017/unit x \. ~ 1017.00
Mobile home dwelling unit $1,017/unit x
Apartment, Condo S610/unit not in CD or COR zones x
Commercial/Industrial $0.142/sq. ft. of property x(not less than $1,017.00)
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -SURFACEWATER .. Estimated -. Pd Prevo .. Partially I'd (Ltd Exemption) Never Pd
Single family residential and mobile home dwelliol!: unit $759/unit x ~ III 75Q.OO
AH other properties $O.265/sq ft of new impervious area of property x
(not less than $759.00)
I PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ :=I . .,p, P IV"
,,)\1 Jt-r, ,'" ) a . (. 1, F .nnf.k ) ... 9~ '" '" • 0 • " 0 Signat';~~ Revi{jing Authority 0 TE
...,
,
. -" ±: • *If subject property hi within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status . < ". _.
Square footage figures are taken from the King County Assessor! s map and are subject to change. • • .. Current City SOC fee charges apply to 0
0
EFFECTIVE January 2, 2006
City a nton Department of Planning! Building! Pu Vorks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pir:tn h7vIP W COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 5, 2007
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-101, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 21, 2007 f~ """'"'" .f"
APPLICANT: Darcey Teets PROJECT MANAGER: Andrea Petzel
PROJECT TITLE: Teets Short Plat PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian :;EP 2/ Inm
SITE AREA: 12,151 square feet BUILDING AREA (qross): N!A 81111 I'll .. " ..
LOCATION: 3612 Meadow Avenue N WORK ORDER NO: 77808
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Application for administrative short plat approval for a 2-lot subdivision in the R-8 zone. Density would
be 7.5 dwelling units!acre. The existing home would be demolished. Proposed lot sizes would be 5,880 sq. ft and 5,733 sq. ft. Both
new lots would have direct access to Meadow Ave. N via private driveways. There are two significant trees onsite, and no critical
areas are present.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e,g, Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housin
Air Aesthetics
Water LighrlGlare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public SelVices
Energy! Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C, CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where addW I information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
sentative Date
Kayr~n Kittrick -Transportation Mitigation Fee,doc
I
Project Name:
Project Address:
Contact Person:
Permit Number:
Project Description:
Land Use Type:
~esidential
o Retail
o Non-retail
Calculation:
S# -nq
Transportation Mitigation Fee
Method of Calculation:
~E Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition
o Traffic Study
oOther (~'O)5FR.. q.S7loLL
~-I \y...9.57 APT
~.-:n 'I.. $15 _dl-'ll.iS
Transportation
Mitigation Fee:
Calculated by:
eU'n.15
. \'.l:!\!'4o Date: ,
Date of Payment: ______________________________________________ ___
Page 1
City 0 nton Department of Planning! Building! Pu Vorks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: EC"Y){l'Y); r 'I]:>,V'. COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 5, 2007
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-101, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 21,2007
APPLICANT: Darcey Teets PROJECT MANAGER: Andrea Petzel
PROJECT TITLE: Teets Short Plat PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian
SITE AREA: 12,151 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): NIA
LOCATION: 3612 Meadow Avenue N I WORK ORDER NO: 77808
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Application for administrative short plat approval for a 2-lot subdivision in the R-8 zone. Density would
be 7.5 dwelling units/acre. The existing home would be demolished. Proposed lot sizes would be 5,880 sq. ft. and 5,733 sq. ft. Both
new lots would have direct access to Meadow Ave. N via private driveways. There are two significant trees ansite, and no critical
areas are present.
A, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Hou,ing
Air
Water
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use
Animals ~
Environmental Health
Energy/
Natura! Resources
Arf~r~:::
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed JO !:jper/y asse~s this proposal. ;tRY> /)Cr .J~';t4 :'7< ;3(?() 7 ~S~ig-n-at~u-re-o~f~D~ir-e-ct~o-r-or-A~u~t~ho-r~iz-e~d~R~e-p-ref~~en~t-at~iv~e~--~---------------Date I
City 0 nton Department of Planning I Building I Pu Vorks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: CDrl'\tnl ctiOtl COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 5, 2007
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-1 01, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 21,2007
APPLICANT: Darcey Teets PROJECT MANAGER: Andrea Petzel
PROJECT TITLE: Teets Short Plat PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian RECEIVED
SITE AREA: 12,151 square feet BUILDING AREA (qross): N/A SEP 2 f 1rln.,
LOCATION: 3612 Meadow Avenue N WORK ORDER NO: 77808
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Application for administrative short plat approval for a 2-lot subdivision in the R-8 zone. De~~:t;,v":''o'~fd
be 7.5 dwelling units/acre. The existing home would be demolished. Proposed lot sizes would be 5,880 sq. ft. and 5,733 sq. ft. Both
new lots would have direct access to Meadow Ave. N via private driveways. There are two significant trees onsite, and no critical
areas are present.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Mjnor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housin
Air Aesthetics
Water Light/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas wh (e additional information is needeg to properly assess this proposal.
" ,
Date
September 21, 2007
Michael Fortson
Department of Transportation
Renton School District
1220 N 4th Street
Renton, W A 98055
Subject: Teets Short Plat
LUA07-101, SHPL-A
CITY .F RENTON
Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator
JEVELOPMENT PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON
OCT -! 2007
RE::CEIVED
The City o~· Renton Dcve!o~~m1cnt Ser'\.:iccs Division has pc'ceived an application for a 2-lot single-family
subdivision located at 3612 Meadow Avenue N. Please see the enclosed Notice of Application for further
details.
In order to process this application, the Development Services Division needs to know which Renton
schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Please fill in
the appropriate schools on the list below and return this letter to my attention, Development Services
Division, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98057 by October 5, 2007.
V· .'
Elementary School: ---F!-,=.Lf",IL1'L:i I...:.:",Lt\ (,-:"",Ike .... ! ""l""t:=' ~ __________________ _
Middle School: --~IR\'-1':( L-"",,:,,-,-t~ll-L1 "-"l)~l<....l\,--,-r ______________ _
High School: ____ ~II-·~.c; . ..JirL.--;'"''"''''b''-~:N'-'"-· __________________ _
Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle t~mpact of the additional students estimated to
come from the proposed development? Yes . No. __ _
Any Comments: _______________________________ _
Thank you for providing this important infonnation. If you have any questions regarding this project,
please contact me at (425) 430·7270.
Sincerely,
/ [j{~~t4(
Andrea Petzel
Associate Planner
Encl.
-------l-OS-S-s-o-u-th-G-r-ad-y-W-a-y-.-R-e-nt-on-,-w-a-s-hi-ng-t-on-9-80-S-7-------------~
® ThiS paper cor.ta:ns 5U'/0 recyc'ed rnatenal, ::>O~/o po,,! c,m<;urTT-r
~fll'_:\1J OF Till'. (;CRVJ'.
CITY OF RENTON
CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
On the 21 st day of September, 2007, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope
containing Acceptance Letter & NOA documents. This information was sent to:
Name
Joe Hopper
Denney & Robin Teets
Doris J. Pease
Darcey Teets
Surrounding Property Owners
(Signature of Sender): y--~
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SS
COUNTY OF KING )
Contact
Owners
Owner
Applicant
See Attached
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker
Representing
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and
purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Dated: 5' / d Yln"1 •
Notary (Print):--k::Ln::~~::--=~..t:lJ:::::""-J::i.JU~mSiJ.L-J;;.~'--'~~-----,k.-E
My appointment expires: Cl -I q -l 0
Project Name: Teets Short Plat
Project Number: LUA07-1 01, SHPL-A
334270048906
BAKER JAMES C
3713 MEADOW AVE N
RENTON WA 98056
334270046702
CHAU DAVID TRUNG & PING LU
1426 N 36TH ST
RENTON WA 98056
334270048401
DUNDAS DONALD R & P DENICE
3701 MEADOW AVE N
RENTON WA 98056
334270049706
JEPSON BARRY+ANITA
11642 100TH AVE NE #105
KIRKLAND WA 98034
334270062709
LAKE BUCKY L
3716 MEADOW AVE N
RENTON WA 98056
334270047205
MATTHEWS SYLVIA B
3609 MEADOW AVE N
RENTON WA 98056
334270049409
MOFFATT ROBERT L & JOAN L
3709 MEADOW AVE N
RENTON WA 98056
334270061305
STARBOW BUILDERS
2004 NE 28TH PL
RENTON WA 98056
334270061701
TEETS DENNY J+ROBIN D+PEASE
3612 MEADOW AVE N
RENTON WA 98056
334270048609
BROWNE THEO A+KIMBERLY A
1409 N 37TH ST
RENTON WA 98056
334270062501
DENEAU ALEA
116 14TH AVE E #1
SEATTLE WA 98112
334210314301
HUNTER DAVID A+KATHLEEN A
1425 N 36TH ST
RENTON WA 98056
334210314806
JIM JACQUES CONSTRUCTiON
1216 NE 38TH ST
RENTON WA 98056
334270049201
LIANG GUOXUAN+XUELING LUO ET AL
3705 MEADOW AVE N
RENTON WA 98905
334270061503
MEADOW2 LLC
4230 160TH AVE SE
BELLEVUE WA 98006
334210314905
RAMOS PEPE R+CATON DEBORAH
1429 N 36TH ST
RENTON WA 98056
334270050001
STOLLER SHAWN E+LYNN E
1405 N 38TH ST
RENTON WA 98056
334270061008
UNG WENDY+SASSI SAID
3600 MEADOW AVE N
RENTON WA 98056
334270046603
BUDD JAMES H
1402 N 36TH
RENTON WA 98056
334270048203
DUESENBERG ERIKA l+JONES MA
1403 N 37TH PL
RENTON WA 98056
334270047601
JENKINS ERIK M+KIMBERLY A
3611 MEADOW AVE N
RENTON WA 98056
334270048104
KILLIAN ANN PATRICIA
3615 MEADOW AVE N
RENTON WA 98056
334270062006
MARTIN DANA RENNELLE+CANTEL
3704 MEADOW AVE N
RENTON WA 98056
334270048005
MITCHELL G C
3625 MEADOW AVE N
RENTON WA 98055
334270047304
SAUNDERS AMY L
3605 MEADOW AVE N
RENTON WA 98056
334270063004
TASCA JAMES G
14805 SE JONES PL
RENTON WA 98058
334210315100
ZHENG TONG LI+MINNA
1433 N 36TH
RENTON WA 98056
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
A Master Application has been filed and accepted with th .. Development Services Division of the City of Renton.
Ttle following briefly doscribes tho application and the n"c~5sary Public Approvals.
PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Teels 31101 Plat.' UJA07-iQl, SHPL·A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A;:.pllc~tlon fer aominlstratlvB slWrl pial approval tor a 2-101 subdiVISiOn In
tnc. R-8 zena. Dens,t\' would be 7 5 dwel:ing units/acre The eXisting nome would be demolished Prcposed lot sizes
wou,d be 5.BBO sC.' ft. an~ 5.733 sq II Bot!-new lots would have dlree: access to Meadow Ave N VIa o,,',ale oflveways
There are two Significant tree5 onslte, and no c"llc~1 areas are present
PROJECT LOCATION: 3612 Meadow Avenue N
PUBLIC APPROVALS; Admlnistrallve Shan Pial
APPLICANTIPROJECT CONTACT PERSON Joe Hopper, P.E PaCific E191neenrg Deslgn LLC, To;l (206) 431_7870;
Eml Jhopper@pacengco'11
Comments on tho aboYo application must be 5ubmltted In writing to Andrea Petzel, Associate PI~nner,
Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, R"nton, WA 9&057, by 5:00 PM on October 5, 2007, II you
have que~tlons about this proposal. or WISh to be made" p"rty of reoord and r6{:e,ve Mclitlonal notillcat,on b)" mail,
contact the PrOject Manager at (425', 430-727C. Anyone who suomlts wr:\ten comments will automaticaily become a party
of record ~~d Will be not,\<sd 01 a~y decision on this project
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
DATE OF APPLICATION: September 11, 2007
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 21, 2007
DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: September 21, 2007
If yOU WO'Jld like to be made a party of record to recel¥e further Informalion on Ihls proposed project, complete thIS form
and return to: City 01 Rentor., Development Pla~n.ng, 1055 Soulh Grady Way, Ranton, WA 98057
Flte Name I No.: Tao;ls Short Plat I LUA07-101, SHPL-A
";WE
MAlLtNGADDRES$ ______________________ _
TELEPHONE NO
CERTIFICATION
I, {;( Vi OJfq '&, , hereby certify that _-:;=-_
were posted by me in ~ conspicuous places or nearb
A TrEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing
~~ \>-\-\-e. , on the daYOf~~
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton.
The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals.
PROJECT NAMEINUMBER: Teets Short Plat! LUA07-101, SHPL-A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Application for administrative short plat approval for a 2-lot subdivision in
the R-8 zone. Density would be 7.5 dwelling units/acre. The existing home would be demolished. Proposed lot sizes
would be 5,880 sq. ft. and 5,733 sq. ft. Both new lots would have direct access to Meadow Ave. N. via private driveways.
There are two significant trees onsite, and no critical areas are present.
PROJECT LOCATION: 3612 Meadow Avenue N
PUBLIC APPROVALS: Administrative Short Plat
APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Joe Hopper, P.E., Pacific Engineering Design, LLC; Tel: (206) 431-7970;
Eml: jhopper@pacen9_com
Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Andrea Petzel, Associate Planner,
Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on October 5,2007. If you
have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mall,
contact the Project Manager at (425) 430-7270. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party
of record and will be notified of any decision on this project.
I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I
DATE OF APPLICATION:
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION:
DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION:
September 11, 2007
September 21, 2007
September 21, 2007
If you would like to be made a party of recard to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form
and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057.
File Name! No.: Teets Short Plat! LUA07-101, SHPL-A
NAME: ______________________________________________________________ ___
MAILING ADDRESS: ______________________________________________________ ___
TELEPHONE NO.: ________________________ _
September 21,2007
Joe Hopper, P.E.
Pacific Engineering Design, LLC
15445 53 rd Avenue S #100
Seattle, WA 98188
Subject: Teets Short Plat
LUA07-101, SHPLcA
Dear Mr. Hopper:
CIT') :IF RENTON
Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator
The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject
application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted
for review.
You will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your
application.
Please contact me at (425) 430-7270 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~~t4(
Associate Planner
cc: Denney & Robin Teets, Doris J. Pease I Owners
Darcey Teets I Applicant
------------I-O-55-S-o-u-fu-G-rn-d-y-W-a-y---Re-n-to-n-,W--M-hl-'n-gW-n--98-0-57-·~----------~ * This paperCOl"ltains 50% recycled material, 30% postconsumer
AHEAD OF THE CURVE
01:.'1-\ej
City of Renton 1h\:VIlLOPMENT PLANNINC
,.. CITY OF ,,<'NTON
LAND USE PERMIT SEP 11 2007
RECEIVED MASTER APPLICATION
PROPERTY OWNER(S) TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS:
NAME:De..n(\~ "Te.e-+s o..~ fZolo;('.. "'!esh. (206) 431·7970 jhopper@paceng.com
ADDRESS: 3 S \-\OI.~6U,J fZ.d PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Teets Short Plat
CITY: 'Dix \·h\\.s Ni ZIP: 117'-16
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 63/-6b7-q17~
PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE:
3612 Meadow Avenue N., Renton, WA 98056
APPLICANT (if other than owner)
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S):
NAME: Darcey Teets
3342700617
COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING LAND USE(S): Residential Single Family
ADDRESS: 2838 109th Ave SE PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Residential Single Family
EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98004
Residential Single Family (RSF)
TELEPHONE NUMBER 206·391-1500 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION
(if applicable): Residential Single Family (RSF)
CONTACT PERSON
EXISTING ZONING: R-8
NAME: Joe Hopper, P.E.
PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): R·8
COMPANY (if applicable): Pacific Engineering
Design, LLC
SITE AREA (in square feet): 12,151 sq ft or .28 acres
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE
ADDRESS: 15445 53'd Avenue 5., Suite 100 DEDICATED: 539 sq ft
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS:
CITY: Seattle ZIP: 98188 NfA
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET
ACRE (if applicable): 2 lots = net density of 7.5 DU
per acre
Q:web/pw/devserv/fonnsiplatulingimasterapp.doc 08/03107
PR ECT INFORMATION conti I
NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): 2 NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE
NEW PROJECT (if applicable): N/A
NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 2 PROJECT VALUE:
IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF
NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 1 ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE
house will be demolished SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): N/A
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE
BUILDINGS (if applicable):
o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A o FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft.
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL o GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft.
BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A o HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft.
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL o SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A
NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if 0 WETLANDS sq. ft.
applicable): N/A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
(Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included)
SITUATE IN A PORTION OF THE S.E. y., NW. Y. OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24 N., RANGE 5E, IN THE
CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES
List all land use applications being applied for:
1. Short Plat 3.
2. 4.
Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
I. (Print Name/s) ~{lf1fgf Teels q!!d RohlfL ~f~ ,declare that I am (please check one) ~he current owner of the property
involved in this application __ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing
statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
I certify that r know or have satisfactory evidence that le.ets ,b' .-~ ~. .::::.:t signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be hislhe their e and voluntary act for the
uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
(Signature of Owner/Representative)
Notary pu~c in and for the State of W:~h:9h,H .1JeM.; '01:1'.
(Signature of Owner/Representative) .~ / ( 2 rl,{ n f2t Li'lu f( LL.i E\JZADETH taHt~O:;~~~orIi
Notary (Print) LC. ALL.' 'C ~ NOtal j publIC. Ss\i1_ .
No. o\1·\A eoontY t I
I · Ooallflod In N'a .. ad I 1i5 2ll.li
'.' 7 I ,,-t ( I tomm1soIon llx\>1f8' Ju Y • My appointment expires:_J_-t-'_-,J'-!-_-'.L. ____ _
I
Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns/pialUling/masterapp.doc 2 08/03/07
City of Renton DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
CITY OF RFNTON
LAND USE PERMIT SEP 1 1 2007
RECE!VED MASTER APPLICATION
PROPERTY OWNER(S) TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E·MAIL ADDRESS:
NAME:&.
~ ~4.<l e..-./. k _
p
(206) 431-7970 jhopper@paceng.com
PROJECT INFORMATION
ADDRESS:
I/, ~t7S-o .-9 r:..2/ PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Teets Short Plat
C~ u)""
ZIP:
9 9' t:? t:? s;>
PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE:
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
'I...l.J--~-.o:i-'Bg~ 3612 Meadow Avenue N., Renton, WA 98056
APPLICANT (if other than owner)
NAME: Darcey Teets
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S):
3342700617
COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING LAND USE(S): Residential Single Family
ADDRESS: 2838 109th Ave SE PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Residential Single Family
EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98004
Residential Single Family (RSF)
TELEPHONE NUMBER 206-391-1500
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION
(if applicable): Residential Single Family (RSF)
CONTACT PERSON
EXISTING ZONING: R-8
NAME: Joe Hopper, P.E.
PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): R-8
COMPANY (if applicable): Pacific Engineering
Design, LLC SITE AREA (in square feet): 12,151 sq ft or .28 acres
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE
ADDRESS: 15445 53 rl1 Avenue S., Suite 100 DEDICATED: 539 sq ft
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS:
CITY: Seattle ZIP: 98188 N/A
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET
ACRE (if applicable): 2 lots = net density of 7.5 DU
per acre
Q:web/pw/devserv/formsJp\anningimasterapp.doc 08122/07
PR -ECT INFORMATION contil d
NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) 2 NUMBER OF EMPLvYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE
NEW PROJECT (if applicable): N/A
NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 2 PROJECT VALUE:
IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF
NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 1 ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE
house will be demolished SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable) N/A
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL 0 AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE
BUILDINGS (if applicable):
o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A 0 FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft.
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL 0 GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft.
BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A 0 HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft.
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL o SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft.
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A
NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if 0 WETLANDS sq. ft.
applicable): N/A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
(Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included)
SITUATE IN A PORTION OF THE S,E. y., N.W. Y. OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24 N" RANGE 5E, IN THE
CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES
List all land use applications being applied for:
1, Short Plat 3,
2, 4,
Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
I, (Print Name/s) .[)" Ie. IS J" ?e II-S .,.. , declare that I am (please check one) /the current owner of the property
involved in this application or __ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing
statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in alt respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
(Signature of Owner/Representative)
(Signature of Owner/Representative)
Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/planninglmasterapp.doc
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that IJ::£.IS J. fE!>S E
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the
uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. .
2 08/22/07
PACIFlc.E:r\lGINEERING DESIGN) LLC:=· =
CIVIL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS
September 4, 2007
Ms. Andrea Petzel
City of Renton
Development Services Division
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, W A 98055
Subject: Teets Short Plat
Project Narrative
Dear Andrea:
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON
SEP 1 1 2007
RECE!VED
PED Project No.: 06089
On behalf of our client, Darcey Teets, the following is the Project Narrative for the Teets
Short Plat, as required as part of the City of Renton Short Plat submittal checklist.
• Project Name, Size and Location: The Teets Short Plat is located in Section 35,
Township 24, Range 5E, W.M. in the City of Renton. The site is located in
Hillmans Lake Washington Garden of Eden No.2, plat lot 122. The King County
Parcel number is 3342700617. The site is more specifically at 3612 Meadow
Avenue North, located north of the intersection of Meadow Avenue No' :lndt,J.
36th St., on the east sid&*Meadow Avenue N. The existing lot size is'1'~ sq
ft, which also equals . ~ acres. The site currently contains a single family
residence which will be removed. This project proposes to subdivide the existing
lot into two lots with two new single family residences.
• Land Use Permits required: Preliminary and Final Short Plat Approvals,
Construction Drawing Approval.
• Zoning Designation: The property is zoned Residential R-8. The adjacent
properties are single family residential.
• Current Use: There is an existing single family residence on site which will be
removed.
• Special Features: There is rio indication of wetlands or streams on site. There
are no steep slopes on site. However, since there is an existing retaining wall and
a significant grade change between proposed Lots 1 and 2, the city required a
Geotechnical Engineering Study be prepared. Copies of the Geotechnical
Engineering Study, prepared by Geotech Consultants on July 27, 2007 are
inel uded with this submittal.
www.paceng.com
-!
15445 53RD AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 1 o:::J,SEATTLE, WA 881 aa FAX 206388-1648 PHONE 425 251-8811 206431-7870
..
Ms. Andrea PetLel
City of Renton
September 4,2007
Teets Short Plat
• Soil Type/Drainage: According to the Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared
by Geotech Consultants, dated July 27, 2007, "The test pits for this study
encountered loose-native and fill soils down to approximately 3 to 7 feet below
the ground surface. Native, loose to medium-dense sand was revealed below the
loose soiL"
The proposed project's stoml water will be discharged to the drainage system
lying within Meadow Avenue along the frontage of the property, Detention and
water quality are not proposed for this project.
• Proposed Use: Two new single-family residences are proposed.
• Access: Access to the project will be from Meadow Avenue N,
• Easement: There is an ingress/egress easement (Recording #9312102007) for
access to a garage for the benefit of the parcel adjacent to the south of this project.
The garage was at some point removed. This ingress/egress easement is currently
shown on the short plat plans; however, since fue garage is no longer on the site,
this easement will be relinquished and will then be removed from the plans,
• Proposed off-site improvements: No off-site improvements are proposed, The
applicant is requesting to pay a fee-in-lieu of constructing frontage improvements.
• Total Estimated Cost/Fair Market Value: Estimated cost $500,000; Market
value (completed homes) $600,000,
• Estimated cut and fill quantities: 400 cy cut, 400 cy filL
• Tree Removal: No significant tree removal is anticipated for home construction
on this site,
• Dedication to the City: A 5 foot right-of-way dedication is proposed along the
frontage of the property, for an approximate area of 540 square feet.
• Proposed size, nnmber and range: Proposed lots are approximately 5,947, sq ft,
• Job shacks, sales trailers, and model home: No proposal at this time,
• Any proposed modifications being requested: None.
Pacific Engineering Design LLC Page 2 of3
P:IProject Filesl06089 Teets Short PlatlProject Narrative for Short Plat SubmittaL doc
Ms. Andrea Petzel
City of Renton
September 4, 2007
Tcets Short Plat
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at (206) 431-7970 or via email
at jhopper(a1paceng.coll1.
Sincerely,
ivd
. oe Hopper
Project Manager
cc: Darcey Teets
Pacific Engineering Design LLC
P:IProject Filesl06089 Teets Short PlatlProject Narrative for Short Plat Submittal.doc
Page 3 of3
•
Pre-application meeting forr the
TEETS SHORT PLAT
3612 Meadow Avenue, N.
PRE01-012
City of Renton
Development Services Division
March I, 2001
Contact information
Planner: Andrea Petzel (425) 430-7270
Public Works Plan Reviewer: Jan lilian (425) 430-7216
Fire Prevention Reviewer: James Gray (425) 430-7023
Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell, (425) 430-7290
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON '
SEP t 1 2007
RECEIVED
Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a
reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects
and contractors who work on the project.
Pre-screening: When you have the project ready for submittal, have
it pre-screened before making all of the required copies.
The pre-application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments
provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of
review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are amended at
times, and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at
the time of formal project submittal. The information contained in this summary is
subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing
Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Public Works Administrator, and City Council).
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
FIRE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
February 20, 2007
Andrea Petzel, Associate Planner
James Gray, Assistant Fire Marshafl ~ )J
Teets Short Plat, Meadow Ave N lt36th St
Fire Department Comments:
I. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-
family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 -square feet in area, the
minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of
the structure.
2. A fire mitigation fee of$488.00 is required for all new single-family structures.
Please feel free to contact rue if you have any questions.
i;\teetssp.doc
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Andrea Petzel
Jan Illian
February 26, 2007
CITY OF RENTOl'l MEMO
PUBLIC WORKS
SUBJECT: PREAPPLICATON REVIEW COMMENTS
TEETS SHORT PLAT
PREAPP NO. 07-012
3612 -Meadow Ave N.
NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN TIDS REPORT:
The following comments on development and permitting issnes are based on the pre-application
snbmittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information
contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers
(e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review
comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the
City or made by the applicant.
WATER
1. There is an existing 12-inch water main fronting the site in Meadow Ave. The main is on the west side of
the road. Available fIre flow exceeds 3,000 gpm. Static pressure in the area is approximately 70 psi.
2. All new construction must have a fIre hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 gpm and must be
located within 300 feet of the structures. There is a fire hydrant in the vicinity that may be counted towards
the fire protection of this project, but is subject to verification for being within 300 feet of the nearest
comer of the building. t('leolfIT<.v0/ >.~ U,.",,,";;:L..'fW"
3. Existing hydrant(s) to be counted as fire protection will require a 5" storz quick disconnect fitting to be
installed if not already in place. .
4. The proposed project is located in the 320 Water Pressure Zone and outside an Aquifer Protection Zone.
5. The Water System Development Charge is $1,956.00 per new single-family lot. Credit will be given to the
existing home. This is payable at the time the utility construction permit is issued.
6. All short plats shall provide a separate water service to each building lot prior to recording of the short plat.
SANITARY SEWER
I. There is an existmg 8-inch sewer main in Meadow Ave N.
2. Short plats shall provide a separate side sewer stubs to new building lot prior to recording of the short plat.
No dual side sewers are allowed. Side sewer shall be a minimum of 2% grade.
3. The Sanitary Sewer System Development Charge is $1,017.00 per new single-family lot. Credit will be
given for the existing home. This is payable at the time the utility construction permit is issued.
Teets Short Plat Preapplication
February 26, 2007
Page 2 of2
SURFACE WATER
I. A preliminary drainage plan and drainage narrative will be required for the site plan application. This site is
required to comply with the 1990 KCSWM.
2. The Surface Water System Development Charge is $759.00 per new building lot. Credit wiJI be given for
existing home. This is payable at the time the utility construction pennit is issued.
3. Erosion control shall comply with the latest edition of the Department of Ecology's Storrowater Manual.
TRANSPORTATION
I. Street lighting is not required to be installed for 3 lots or less.
2. Applicant will be required to dedicate five feet of right-of-way fronting the site in Meadow Ave N.
Minimum right of way width is fifty feet.
3. The traffic mitigation fee of $75 per additional generated trip shall be assessed per new single family home
at a rate of9.57 trips. ($75 x 9.57 x # oflots). Credit will be given to existing home. ~l \1
4. Half street improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutter, paving and storro drainage are required to be
installed if not already in place per City code. Applicant may submit a request to Public Works to pay a fee
in lieu of installing these improvements. ~ w.l U:.J APfUcM..\j.... ~ S; L;1c!.
5. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Undergrounding Ordinance. If three
or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shaH be
placed underground.
GENERAL COMMENTS
I. All plans shaH conforro to the Renton Drafting Standards
2 Wben approval of preliminary plat is granted and utility plans are complete, please submit permit
application, three (3) copies of drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, and an itemized cost of
construction estimate and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. A fee worksheet is attached for
your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to caH 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as
generated by the permit system.
The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated
construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over
$200,000. Halfthe fee must be paid upon application.
3. The applicant is responsible for securing all necessary private utility easements prior to the recording of the
short plat.
4. Separate permits and fees for water meters, side sewers, and storro drainage connections are required.
cc: Kayren Kittrick
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
General
CHY OF RENTON
JI>i:mning/BuHding/JPubiic Woriks
MEMORANDUM
March 1, 2007
Pre-Application File No. PRE07-012
Andrea Petzel, Planner (425) 430-7270
Teets Short Plat
We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above-referenced
development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based
on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in
effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this
summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g.,
Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Development Services Director, Public Works
Administrator, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised hased on site
planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant
is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. 1be Development
Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first
floor of City Hall or on the City's website www.rentonwa.gov.
Project Proposal
The subject property is zoned Residential-S (R-S), and is located in the Kennydale Hill area of
Renton, at 3612 Meadow Avenue, N. The proposal is to subdivide an approximately 13,827 (.32
acre) parcel into two lots. The site contains one existing house, which would be demolished and
two new single-family residences will be built. Proposed lot sizes are approximately 5,947 sq. ft.
and both lots would be accessed from Meadow Avenue, N.
Development Standards
Zoning/Densitv Requirements -The subject property is located within the R-S zoning
designation. The density range required in the R-S zone is a minimum of 4.0 to a maximum of S.O
dwelling units per acre (dulac). A two lot short plat of a 0.32 acre parcel would result in a density
of 6.25 du/acre, which would be within the permitted density range in the R-S. After the 5' road
dedication along Meadow Avenue, N. approximately 11,S62 sq. ft (.27 acres) remains, resulting in
a density of 7.4 dulac. Therefore, the lot meets code requirements for a short plat.
Minimum Lot Size, Width and Depth -The minimum lot size permitted in the R-S is 4,500 square
feet for lots greater than 1 acre in size and 5,000 square feet for lots 1 acre or less in size. A
minimum lot width of 50 feet for interior lots and 60 feet for comer lots, as well as a minimum lot
depth of 65 feet, is also required. The total area of the proposed subdivision is less than 1 acre, so
the minimum lot size is 5,000 square feet. At approximately 5,947 sq. ft. each, both lots appear to
meet the minimum lot size requirement. Both lots meet the lot width and depth requirements.
Building Standards -The R-S zone allows a maximum building coverage of35% of the lot area
or 2,500 square feet, whichever is greater. Building height is restricted to 30 feet and 2-stories.
Any detached accessory structure must be below a height of 15 feet and one-story. The gross
floor area must be less than that of the primary structure. Accessory structures are also included
in building lot coverage calculations. Detached accessory structures (garages, sheds, etc.) are
Teets Short Plat Pre-Applicatio ..:ting
March I, 2007
Page 2 of4
permitted at a maximum number of two per lot at 720 square feet each, or one per lot at 1,000
square feet in size.
Setbacks -Setbacks are the minimum required distance between the building footprint and the
property line or private access easement. The required setbacks in the R-8 zone are 15 feet in
front for the primary structure; 20 feet in front for the attached garage; 20 feet in the rear; 5 feet
for interior side yards; 15 feet for side yards along streets (including access easements) for the
primary structure; and, 20 feet for side yards along streets (including access easements) for
attached garages. The front yards of Lots 1 and 2 would be along Meadow Avenue, North. Both
new lots would have adequate area to build a house and meet setback requirements.
'The rear yard for the proposed project abuts Interstate 405 and could possibly be ¥
impacted by the proposed widening of the highway. The applicant should contact Colleen .
Gatz at the Dept. of Transportation for forther information 206-768-5792.
AccesslParking -Street improvements, including, curbs, gutter and sidewalk, are required along
of the frontage of properties when they are subdivided. The applicant may ask to have this
requirement deferred, but a fee-in-lieu of would be required at a rate that it would cost the City to
construct these improvements. The money would go to a general street improvement fund and not
necessarily be used on improvements along the applicant's site. Both lots have street frontage that
would provide direct access to a public street. Each lot must allow for the parking of two vehicles
on the property. Street improvements along Meadow Avenue, N. would be required.
Landscaping
Landscaping is required along the frontage of all new short plats. A 5 ft. wide irrigated or drought
resistant landscape strip is the minimum amount of landscaping necessary for a site abutting a ~~
non-arterial public street. A 5 ft. landscape strip will be required in the right-of-way, where f~
possible, and on the lots themselves where there is not enough space for the strip in the right-of-
way. Landscaping must be installed prior to final plat approval and recording.
In addition to the 5 ft. landscape strip requirement, the tree requirement for short plats is at least
two trees of a City approved species with a minimum caliper of I 112 inches in the front yard or
planting strip on every lot. The trees must be planted prior to building occupancy.
Fences
• A Conceptual Landscape Plan, showing the two trees per lot and the plantings
in the 5 ft. landscape strip, as defined in RMC 4-8-120D must be submitted at the
time of short plat application. A Detailed Landscape Plan will be required at
submittal for final short plat review.
Permitted fence height is 48" in the front yard and side yards along a street, and 72" in the rear
yard and interior side yards. Fences cannot exceed 42" in height in the clear vision area of comer
lots. Please see enclosed handout on fences for specific details. If the applicant intends to include
a fence as part ofthe landscaping, please submit conceptual fence details along with the landscape
plan.
Critical Areas .,
There is no indication of wetlands or streams on this site. Although the presence of sensitive ,U 0~~~1')7
slopes does not appear on City of Renton maps, there is a an existing retaining wall and a '1"' ~D .
significant grade change between proposed Lots I and 2. The applicant would be required to
submit a geotechnical report to address issues of soil stability and grading. \)\,1.1\\ \jf
Teets Short Plat Pre-Application ng
March I, 2007
Page 3 of 4
Significant Tree Retention
A tree inventory and a tree retention plan shall be provided with the formal land use application.
The tree retention plan must show preservation of at least 25% of significant trees [those with a
minimum diameter of 8" (evergreen) or 12" (deciduous) when measured four feet above grade],
and indicate how proposed building footprints will be sited to accommodate preservation of
significant trees that will be retained.
'The site plan that was submitted appears to have trees on it, but they do not
correspond with the location of trees that actually exist on site. Specifically,
there is a large western hemlock in the SW corner of proposed Lot 2 that is
possibly on the neighbor's property and would need to be protected.
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
The existing development is located within the Residential Single Family (RSF) Comprehensive
Plan Land Use designation. The following proposed policies are applicable to the proposal:
Land Use Element
Objective LU-FF: Encourage re-investment and rehabilitation of existing housing, and
development of new residential plats resulting in quality neighborhoods that:
I. Are planned at urban densities and implement Growth Management targets,
2. Promote expansion and use of public transportation; and
3. Make more efficient use of urban services and infrastructure.
Policy LU-149. Lot size should exclude private sidewalks, easements, private road, and driveway
easements, except alley easements.
Policy LU-150. Required setbacks should exclude public or private legal access areas,
established through or to a lot, and parking areas.
Policy LU-152. Single-family lot size, lot width, setbacks, and impervious surface should be
sufficient to allow private open space, landscaping to provide buffers/privacy without extensive
fencing, and sufficient area for maintenance activities.
Policy LU-154. Interpret development standards to support new plats and infill project designs
incorporating street locations, lot configurations, and building envelopes that address privacy and
quality of life for existing residents. -
Community Design Element
Policy CD-12. Infill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be
encouraged in order to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods.
Policy CD-13. Infill development should be reflective ofthe existing character of established
neighborhoods even when designed using different architectural styles, andlor responding to more
urban setbacks, height or lot requirements. Infill development should draw on elements of
existing development such as placement of structures, vegetation, and location of entries and
walkways, to reflect the site planning and scale of existing areas.
Permit Reqnirements
To subdivide the lot, the applicant must make formal short plat submittal. A submittal checklist,
listing the items that must be included in the submittal packet to the City, is included in the
preapplication meeting packet of information.
'Once the short plat application materials are complete, the applicant is strongly
encouraged to have one copy of the application materials pre-screened at the 6'h floor
front counter prior to submitting the complete application package.
Teets Short Plat Pre-Applicatio ;ting
March 1, 2007
Page 4 of4
Short plats are processed administratively within an estimated time frame of 6 to 8 weeks for
preliminary short plat approval. The application fee is $1,000,00, The applicant will be required
to install a public information sign on the property. Detailed information regarding the land use
application submittal is provided in the attached handouts.
Once preliminary approval is received, the applicant must complete any required improvements,
such as putting in sidewalks, a fire hydrant or grading. A separate construction permit is required
for these improvements. The applicant must also satisfY any conditions of the preliminary
approval before the plat can be recorded. The newly created lots may be sold only after the plat
has been recorded. The applicant can submit for a building permit review for the new house
before the short plat is recorded, but the City can only issue the building permit when the plat has
been recorded.
Fees
In addition to the fees for review of the land-use, construction and building permits, the following
mitigation fees would be required prior to the recording of the plat.
• A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily trip
attributable to the project; and,
• A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $488.00 per new single-family residence,
• The R-8 zone permits one residential structure per unit per lot. The applicant would be
required to obtain a demolition permit for the existing house. Demolition permits are
valid for a period of six months.
A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees in attached for your review,
Expiration
Upon preliminary short plat approval, the preliminary short plat approval is valid for two years
with a possible one-year extension.
cc: Jennifer Henning
DEVELOPMENT PLANNINC
SITY OF R~NTON 0
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS
SEP 1 1 2007
.... /:;J\/Erc , ~,~t:l'l.~f~' U
his requirement may be waived by:
Property Services Section
Public Works Plan Review Section
Building Section
Development Planning Section
PROJECT NAME: Tet?15 S;1-orz( fl.-Ifl
DATE 8/~1 /0'7
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
WAIVEu-o;: OF SUBMITTAL REQUIReMENTS
FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS
Wireless:
Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3
Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3
Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3
Map of Existing Site Conditions
•.•. ,Map of View Area 2 AND 3
Photosimulations 3
rhis requirement may be waive'd by:
I. Property Services Section
. '. Public Works Plan Review Section
:. Building Section
:'Development Planning Section
PROJECTNAME: ________________________ __
DATE: ______________________ _
n-\WI=R\P\N\nFVsr=R\/\Fnrrn<::\PI~nnin(1\w:lh,&>rnfc:.llhmitt:::llrpn<:: 0Jll=: vIc:
Page 1 of 1
Jayna Paradise
From: Andrea Petzel [APetzel@cLrenton.wa.usj
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 11 :24 AM
To: Jayna Paradise
Subject: Re: Teets Short Plat
Yes, j'll waive it. Just bring a copy of this email when you submit the application materials.
Andrea Petzel, Planner
City of Renton -Development Services Division
Renton City Hall -6th Floor
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
425-430-7270
apetzel @c:i.r~nton. wa. us
»> "Jayna Paradise" <jayna@paceng.com> 08/29/07 11:07 AM »>
Andrea:
Will you waive the requirement for the Flood Hazard Data for the Teets Short Plat (PRE07-012) (2 lot plat at
3612 Meadow Avenue N)? It is not located in a flood plain. .
I have attached the waiver form for this project.
Regards,
Jayna Paradise
Pacific Engineering Design, LLC
15445 53rd Avenue S., SUite 100
Seattle, WA 98188
206.431.7970 phone
206.388.1648 fax
www.paceng.com
8/29/2007
DEV~LOPMENT PLANNING
vlTY OF RENT0"!
SEP I I 2007
RECEIVED
DENSITY
WORKSHEET
City of Renton Development Services Division
1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98055
Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231
1. Gross area of property: 1. rZ.ISI
)
2. Certain areas are excluded from density calculations.
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
N
SEP 1 1 2( 7
RECEIVE D
square feet
These include public roadways, private access
easements serving 3 or more dwelling units,
and critical areas.' Total excluded area:" 2. ---.:S=-=~=-9~_ square feet
3. Subtract line 2 from line 1 for net area: 3. ---!J\ \'.j:!.It..c"-JI~L-=--_ square feet
4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: 4. ---.:o~:z. ... -'--!..-_ acres
5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned: 5. __ ~ __ unitsllots
6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: 6. _1--.:.......5=-__ d. u.lacre
L. lots or units would result in a net density of /.5 dwelling units per acre.
'Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for
development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations not
including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways."
Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded.
*. Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded.
R:\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\density.doc 0711 8/0jl
GEOTECH
CONSULTANTS, INC
Celebrating 20 Years 1986-2006
Caden Homes, LLC
2838 -109th Avenue Southeast
Bellevue, Washington 98004
Attention: Darcy Teets
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON
SEP 1 1 2007
RECEIVED
Subject: Transmittal Letter -Geotechnical Engineering Study
Proposed Two-Lot Short-Plat
3612 Meadow Avenue North
Renton, Washington
Dear Mr. Teets:
13256 Northeast 20th Street, Suite 16
Bellevue. Washington 98005
(4Z5) 747-5618 FAX (425) 747-8561
July 27,2007
JN 07270
We are pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report for the proposed two-lot short plat
to be constructed in Renton, Washington. The scope of our services consisted of exploring site
surface and subsurface conditions, and then developing this report to provide recommendations for
general earthwork and design criteria for foundations, retaining walls, temporary excavations. This
work was authorized by your acceptance of our proposal, P-7380, dated July 3,2007.
The attached report contains a discussion of the study and our recommendations. Please contae!
us if there ara any questions regarding this report, or for further assistance during the design and
construction phases of this project.
Respectfully submitted,
DRW:jyb
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Proposed Two-Lot Short-Plat
3612 Meadow Avenue North
Renton, Washington
This report presents the findings and recommendations of our geotechnical engineering study for
the site of the proposed residential short-plat to be located in Renton.
We were provided with an existing topography map for the site that was prepared by Pacific
Engineering Design and dated May 29, 2007. In addition to illustrating existing features, the map
also indicates how the site will be separated Into two lots. In conversations with Mr. Darcy Teets of
Gaden Homes, LLC, we understand that potentially the site will be graded so that each lot has a
somewhat flat grade. The southern lot will be higher than the northem lot. Two-story residences
will likely be constructed on the lots.
If the scope of the project changes from what we have described above, we should be provided
with revised plans in order to determine if modifications to the recommendations and conclusions of
this report are warranted.
SITE CONDITIONS
SURFACE
The Vicinity Map, Plate 1, illustrates the general location of the site in the Kennydale Area of
Renton. The site is nearly rectangular, having approximately 108 feet of frontage on its western
side along Meadow Avenue North and an average depth of about 112 feet. The northern portion of
the site is developed with a residence and associated features. The southem portion is
undeveloped and mostly covered with tall grass. However, there is a bare area on the eastern side
of this portion; we understand from Mr. Teets Ihal a shed was once localed Ihere. An existing
retaining wall separates the residence area from the soulhern portion. The wall appears to be in a
poor condition in our opinion. The overall site slopes gently to moderately downward to Ihe
north/northeast, having a maximum topographic relief of about 13 feet.
Residential properties border the sile to Ihe north and south. The soulhern residence is located
about 15 feet from the adjoining property line. The right-of-way for Interstate 405 borders the
property to the easl. A relatively sleep slope, likely graded for the conslruclion of Ihe freeway,
declines away from the eastern side of the site.
SUBSURFACE
The subsurface conditions were explored by excavating three tesl pits at the approximate locations
shown on the Site Exploration Plan, Plale 2. Our exploration program was based on the proposed
construction, anticipated subsurface conditions and those encountered during exploration, and the
scope of work outlined in our proposal.
The test pits were excavated on July 17, 2007 with a rubber-tired backhoe. A geotechnical
engineer from our staff observed the excavation process and logged the test pits. "Grab" samples
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS. INC.
CadenHomes
July 27, 2007
IN 07270
Page 2
of selected subsurface soil were collected from the backhoe bucket. The Test Pit Logs are
attached to this report as Plates 3 and 4.
Soil Conditions
The test pit excavated in the southeastem portion of the site revealed approximately 2 feet
of fill soil that included some small debris. Native soil was revealed below the fill at that
location, and at the ground surface in the other two test pits. Below a thin mantle of topsoil,
the native soil revealed consisted of loose, fine-grained, slightly silty sand with many
organics and roots. At about 3 to 5 feet below the top of the native soil, the sand became
loose to medium-dense. These depths correspond to 3 to 7 feet below the ground surface.
Some silt layers were revealed in the lower portion of the sand. The test pits were
excavated to the maximum explored depth of 6 to 10 feet.
No large obstructions were revealed by our explorations. However, debris, buried utilities,
and old foundation and slab elements are commonly encountered on sites that have had
previous development.
Groundwater Conditions
No groundwater seepage was observed in the test pits. However, they were left open for
only a short time period. Therefore, the level of the static groundwater level in the test pits
may not be known. It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall
and other factors. It is possible that some groundwater could be found perched above
some silt layers in the sand soli during the normally wet winter and spring months.
The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the
exploration locations. The actual transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface
conditions can vary between exploration locations. The logs provide specific subsurface
information only at the locations tested. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated
on the test pit logs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during
excavation.
The compaction of backfill was not in the scope of our services. Loose soil will therefore be found
in the area of the test pits. If this presents a problem, the backfill will need to be removed and
replaced with structural fill during construction.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
GENERAL
THIS SECTION CONTAINS A SUMMARY OF OUR STUDY AND FINDINGS FOR THE PURPOSES OF A
GENERAL OVERVIEW ONL v: MORE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDA TlONS AND CONCLUSIONS ARE
CONTAINED IN THE REMAINDER OF THIS REPORT. ANY PARTY REL YING ON THIS REPORT SHOULD
READ THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT.
The test pits conducted for this study encountered loose-native and fill soils down to approximately
3 to 7 feet below the ground surface. Native, loose to medium-dense sand was revealed below the
loose soil. This native sand is suitable to support building loads founded on conventional footings,
provided the footing bearing capacities are relatively light. The footings can also be placed on
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
CadenHomes
July 27, 2007
IN 07270
Page 3
structural fill that is placed over the loose to medium-dense sand. We recommend that the sand be
compacted with vibratory equipment before any structural fill and/or footings are placed on it.
The upper, loose soils revealed in the test pits are not suitable as structural fill because they
contain too much debris and/or organics. The non-organlc sand below the loose soils may be used
if the moisture is not too high or low. However, due to the fine-grained nature of the sand, it will
have to be compacted in relatively small lifts (6 to 10 inches) with large vibratory equipment.
The erosion control measures needed during the site development will depend heavily on the
weather conditions that are encountered. While site clearing will expose a large area of bare soil,
the erosion potential on the site is relatively low due to the gentle slope of the ground. We
anticipate that 'a silt fence will be needed around the downslope sides of any cleared areas.
Rocked construction access roads should be extended into the site to reduce the amount of soil or
mud carried off the property by trucks and equipment. Wherever possible, these roads should
follow the alignment of planned pavements, and trucks should not be allowed to drive off of the
rock-covered areas. Existing catch baSins in, and immediately downslope of, the planned work
areas should be protected with pre-manufactured silt socks. Cut slopes and soil stockpiles should
be covered with plastic during wet weather. Following rough grading, it may be necessary to mulch
or hydroseed bare areas that will not be immediately covered with landscaping or an impervious
surface.
The drainage and/or waterproofing recommendations presented in this report are intended only to
prevent active seepage from flowing through concrete walls or slabs. Even in the absence of active
seepage into and beneath structures, water vapor can migrate through walls, slabs, and floors from
the surrounding soil, and can even be transmitted from slabs and foundation walls due to the
concrete curing process. Water vapor also results from occupant uses, such as cooking and
bathing. Excessive water vapor trapped within structures can result in a variety of undesirable
conditions, including, but not limited to, moisture problems with flooring systems, excessively moist
air within occupied areas, and the growth of molds, fungi, and other biological organisms that may
be harmful to the health of the occupants. The designer or architect must consider the potential
vapor sources and likely occupant uses, and provide sufficient ventilation, either passive or
mechanical, to prevent a build up of excessive water vapor within the planned structure.
Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the
recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan
review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include
revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical
constraints that become more evident during the review process.
We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents. This report
should also be provided to any future property owners so they will be aware of our findings and
recommendations.
SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS
In accordance with Table 1615.1.1 of the 2003 International Building Code (IBC), the site soil
profile within 100 feet of the ground surface is best represented by Soil Profile Type 0 (Stiff Soil
Profile). The site SOils are not susceptible to liquefaction due to the absence of near-surface
groundwater.
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
Caden Homes
July 27, 2007
CONVENnONALFOUNDAnONS
IN 07270
Page 4
The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing
on undisturbed, loose to medium-dense, native sand soil, or on structural fill placed above this
competent, native soil. Some overexcavation will likely be needed in foundation areas to reach this
competent soil. The native sand should be compacted with vibratory eqUipment before the
placement of the structural fill and/or footings. See the section entitled General Earthwork and
Structural Fill for recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill
beneath structures. Adequate compaction of structural fill shoUld be verified with frequent density
testing during fill placement. Prior to placing structural fill beneath foundations, the excavation
should be observed by the geotechnical engineer to document that adequate bearing soils have
been exposed. We recommend that continuous and individual spread footings have minimum
widths of 16 and 24 inches, respectively. Exterior footings should also be bottomed at least 18
inches below the lowest adjacent finish ground surface for protection against frost and erosion. The
local building codes should be reviewed to determine if different footing widths or embedment
depths are required. Footing subgrades must be cleaned of loose or disturbed soil prior to pouring
concrete. Depending upon site and equipment constraints, this may require removing the
disturbed soil by hand.
Depending on the final site grades, overexcavation may be required below the footings to expose
competent native soil. Unless lean concrete is used to fill an overexcavated hole, the
overexcavation must be at least as wide at the bottom as the sum of the depth of the
overexcavation and the footing width. For example, an overexcavation extending 2 feet below the
bottom of a 2-foot-wide footing must be at least 4 feet wide at the base of the excavation. If lean
concrete is used, the overexcavation need only extend 6 inches beyond the edges of the footing.
An allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) is appropriate for footings
supported on soliS noted above. A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used
when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated
that the total post-construction settlement of footings founded on competent native soil, or on
structural fill up to 5 feet in thickness, will be about one inch, with differential settlements on the
order of three-quarters of an inch in a distance of 50 feet along a continuous footing with a uniform
load.
Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundation and
the bearing soil, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the
foundation. For the lalter condition, the foundation must be either poured directly against relatively
level, undisturbed soil or be surrounded by level structural fill. We recommend using the fOllowing
ultimate values for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading:
Coefficient of Friction 0.40
Passive Earth Pressure 300 pcf
Where: (i) pet Is pounds psr cubic foot, and (II) pa.slve earth
pressure Is computed using the equivalent fluid density.
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
CadenHomes
July 27, 2007
IN 07270
Page 5
If the ground in front of a foundation is loose or sloping, the passive earth pressure given above will
not be appropriate. We recommend maintaining a safety factor of at least 1.5 for the foundation's
resistance to lateral loading, when using the above ultimate values.
PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS
Retaining walls backfilled on only one side should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures
imposed by the soil they retain. The following recommended parameters are for walls that restrain
level backfill:
------~,---
I' \R \~I[ nm
I
Active Earth Pressure· 35 pcf
Passive Earth Pressure 300 pcf
Coefficient of Friction 0.40
Soil Unit Weight 120 pet
Where: (I) pet is pounds per cubic foot, and (II) active and
passive earth pres.ur •• are computed using the equivalent fluid
pressures.
* For a restrained wall that cannot deflect at least O.QQ2 times Its
height, a uniform lateral pressure equal to 10 psi time. the height
of the wall should be added to the above active equivalent fluid
pressure.
The values given above are to be used to design permanent foundation and retaining walls only. It
is not appropriate to back-calculate soil strength parameters from the earth pressures and soil unit
weights presented in the table. The passive pressure given is appropriate for the depth of level
structural fill placed in front of a retaining or foundation wall only. The values for friction and
passive resistance are ultimate values and do not include a safety factor. We recommend a safety
factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding, when using the above values to design the walls.
Restrained wall soil parameters should be utilized for a distance of 1.5 times the wall height from
comers or bends in the walls. This is intended to reduce the amount of cracking that can occur
where a wall is restrained by a corner.
The design values given above do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the
walls and assume that no surcharges, such as those caused by slopes, vehicles, or adjacent
foundations will be exerted on the walls. If these conditions exist, those pressures should be added
to the above lateral soil pressures. Where sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, we will need
to be given the wall dimensions and the slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate
design earth pressures. The surcharge due to traffic loads behind a wall can typically be
accounted for by adding a uniform pressure equal to 2 feet multiplied by the above active fluid
density.
Wall Pressures Due to Seismic Forces
To model the surcharge wall loads that could be Imposed by the design earthquake, we
recommend adding a uniform lateral pressure to the above-recommended active pressure.
The recommended surcharge pressure is 8H pounds per square foot (psf), where H is the
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
Caden Homes
July 27, 2007
IN 07270
Page 6
design retention height of the wall. Using this increased pressure, the safety factor against
sliding and overturning can be reduced to 1.2 for the seismic analysis.
Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within
a distance equal to the height of a wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral
pressures resulting from the equipment. The wall design criteria assume that the backfill will be
well-compacted in lifts no thicker than 12 inches. The compaction of backfill near the walls should
be accomplished with hand-operated equipment to prevent the walls from being overloaded by the
higher soil forces that occur during compaction.
Retaining Wall Backfill and Waterproofing
Backfill placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be coarse, free-draining
structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt
or clay particles and have no gravel greater than 4 inches in diameter. The percentage of
particles passing the NO.4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. If the native sand
is used as backfill, a minimum 12-inch width of free-draining gravel or a drainage composite
similar to Mlradrain 6000 should be placed against the backfilled retaining walls. The
drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system.
The later section entitled Drainage Considerations should also be reviewed for
recommendations related to subsurface drainage behind foundation and retaining walls.
The purpose of tihese backfill requirements is to ensure that the design criteria for a
retaining wall are not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the
wall. The top 12 to 18 inches of the backfill should consist of a compacted, relatively
impenneable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. The ground surface must also
slope away from backfilled walls to reduce the potential for surface water to percolate into
the backfill. The section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains
recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining
and foundation walls.
The above recommendations are not intended to waterproof below-grade walls, or to
prevent the formation of mold, mildew or fungi in interior spaces. Over time, the
perfonnance of subsurface drainage systems can degrade, subsurface groundwater flow
patterns can change, and utilities can break or develop leaks. Therefore, waterproofing
should be provided where future seepage through the walls is not acceptable. This typically
includes limiting cold-joints and wall penetrations, and using bentonite panels or
membranes on the outside of the walls. There are a variety of different waterproofing
materials and systems, which should be installed by an experienced contractor familiar with
the anticipated construction and subsurface conditions. Applying a thin coat of asphalt
emulsion to the outside face of a wall is not considered waterproofing, and will only help to
reduce moisture generated from water vapor or capillary action from seeping through the
concrete. As with any project, adequate ventilation of basement and crawl space areas is
important to prevent a build up of water vapor that is commonly transmitted through
concrete walls from the surrounding soil, even when seepage is not present. This is
appropriate even when waterproofing is applied to the outside of foundation and retaining
walls. We recommend that you contact a specialty consultant if detailed recommendations
or specifications related to waterproofing design, or minimizing the potential for infestations
of mold and mildew are desired.
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
CadenHomes
July 27, 2007
IN 07270
Page 7
The General, Slabs-On·Grade, and Drainage Considerations sections should be
reviewed for additional recommendations related to the control of groundwater and excess
water vapor for the anticipated construction.
SLABS·ON·GRADE
The building floors can be constructed as slabs-on-grade atop firm, existing soil, or on structural fill.
The subgrade soil must be in a firm, non-yielding condition at the time of slab construction or
underslab fill placement. Any soft areas encountered should be excavated and replaced with
select, imported structural fill.
Even where the expos'ed soils appear dry, water vapor will tend to naturally migrate upward through
the soil to the new constructed space above it. All interior slabs-on-grade must be underlain by a
capillary break or drainage layer consisting of a minimum 4-inch thickness of gravel or crushed
rock that has a fines content (percent passing the No. 200 sieve) of less than 3 percent and a sand
content (percent passing the No.4 sieve) of no more than 10 percent. As noted by the American
Concrete Institute (ACI) in the Guides for Concrete Floor and Slab Structures, proper moisture
protection is desirable immediately below anyon-grade slab that will be covered by tile, wood,
carpet. impermeable floor coverings, or any moisture-sensitive equipment or products. ACI also
notes that vapor retarders, such as 6-mil plastic sheeting, are typically used. A vapor retarder is
defined as a material with a permeance of less than 0.3 US perms per square foot (psf) per hour,
as determined by ASTM E 96. It is possible that concrete admixtures may meet this speCification,
although the manufacturers of the admixtures should be consulted. Where plastic sheeting is used
under slabs, joints should overlap by at least 6 inches and be sealed with adhesive tape. The
sheeting should extend to the foundation walls for maximum vapor protection. If no potential for
vapor passage through the slab is desired, a vapor barrier should be used. A vapor barrier, as
defined by ACI, is a product with a water transmission rate of 0.00 perms per square foot per hour
when tested in accordance with ASTM E 96. Reinforced membranes having sealed overlaps can
meet this requirement.
In the recent past, ACI (Section 4.1.5) recommended that a minimum of 4 inches of well-graded
compactable granular material, such as a 5/8 inch minus crushed rock pavement base, should be
placed over the vapor retarder or barrier for protection of the retarder or barrier and as a "blotter" to
aid in the curing of the concrete slab. Sand was not recommended by ACI for this purpose.
However, the use of material over the vapor retarder is controversial as noted in current ACI
literature because of the potential that the protection/blotter material can become wet between the
time of its placement and the installation of the slab. If the material is wet prior to slab placement,
which is always possible in the Puget Sound area, it could cause vapor transmission to occur up
through the slab in the future, essentially destroying the purpose of the vapor barrier/retarder.
Therefore, if there is a potential that the protection/blotter material will become wet before the slab
is installed, ACI now recommends that no protectionlblotter material be used. However, ACI then
recommends that, because there is a potential for slab cure due to the loss of the blotter material,
joint spacing in the slab be reduced, a low shrinkage concrete mixture be used, and "other
measures' (steel reinforcing, etc.) be used. ASTM E-1643-98 "Standard Practice for Installation of
Water Vapor Retarders Used in Contact with Earth or Granular Fill Under Concrete Slabs"
generally agrees with the recent AClliterature.
We recommend that the contractor, the project materials engineer, and the owner discuss these
issues and review recent AClliterature and ASTM E-1643 for installation guidelines and guidance
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS. INC.
CadenHomes
July 27, 2007
IN 07270
Page 8
on the use of the protection/blotter material. Our opinion is that with impervious surfaces that all
means should be undertaken to reduce water vapor transmission.
The General, Permanent Foundation and Retaining Walls, and Drainage Considerations
sections should be reviewed for additional recommendations related to the control of groundwater
and excess water vapor for the anticipated construction.
We recommend proof-rolling slab areas with a heavy truck or a large piece of construction
equipment prior to slab construction. Any soft areas encountered during proof-rolling should be
excavated and replaced with select, imported structural fill.
EXCAVATIONS AND SLOPES
Excavation slopes should not exceed the limits specified in local, state, and national government
safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of about 4 feet may be attempted vertically in
unsaturated soil, if there are no indications of slope instability. However, vertical cuts should not be
made near property boundaries, or existing utilities and structures. Based upon Washington
Administrative Code (WAC) 296, Part N, the soil at the subject site would generally be classified as
Type B. Therefore, temporary cut slopes greater than 4 feet in height should not be excavated at
an inciination steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical), extending continuously between the top and
the bottom of a cut.
The above-recommended temporary slope inclination is based on the conditions exposed in our
explorations, and on what has been successful at other sites with similar soil conditions. It is
possible that variations in soil and groundwater conditions will require modifications to the
inclination at which temporary slopes can stand. Temporary cuts are those that will remain
unsupported for a relatively short duration to allow for the construction of foundations, retaining
walls, or utilities. Temporary cut slopes should be protected with plastic sheeting during wet
weather. It is also important that surface water be directed away from temporary slope cuts. The
cut slopes should also be backfilled or retained as soon as possible to reduce the potential for
instability. Please note that sand can cave suddenly and without warning. Excavation, foundation,
and utility contractors should be made especially aware of this potential danger. These
recommendations may need to be modified if the area near the potential cuts has been disturbed in
the past by utility installation, or if settlement-sensitive utilities are located nearby.
All permanent cuts into native soil should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fiii slopes should
also not be constructed with an inciination greater than 2:1 (H:V). To reduce the potential for
shallow sloughing, fill must be compacted to the face of these slopes. This can be accomplished
by overbuilding the compacted fill and then trimming it back to its final inclination. Adequate
compaction of the slope face is important for long-term stability and is necessary to prevent
excessive settlement of patios, slabs, foundations, or other improvements that may be placed near
the edge of the slope. Water should not be allowed to fiow uncontrolled over the top of any
temporary or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an
appropriate species of vegetation.
DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS
Foundation drains should be used where (1) crawl spaces or basements will be below a structure,
(2) a slab is below the outside grade, or (3) the outside grade does not slope downward from a
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
Caden Homes
July 27, 2007
IN 07270
Page 9
building. Drains should also be placed at the base of all earth-retaining walls. These drains should
be surrounded by at least 6 inches of 1-inch-minus, washed rock and then wrapped in non-woven,
geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At its highest pOint, a
perforated pipe invert should be at least 6 inches below the bottom of a slab floor or the level of a
crawl space, and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept
separate from the foundation drain system. A typical drain detail is attached to this report as Plate
5. For the best long-term performance, perforated PVC pipe is recommended for all subsurface
drains.
As a minimum, a vapor retarder, as defined in the Slabs-On·Grade section, should be provided in
any crawl space area to limit the transmission of water vapor from the underlying soils. Also, an
outlet drain is recommended for all crawl spaces to prevent a build up of any water that may
bypass the footing drains.
No groundwater was observed during our field work. However, if seepage is encountensd in an
excavation, it should be drained from the site by directing it through drainage ditches, perforated
pipe, or French drains, or by pumping it from sumps interconnected by shallOW connector trenches
at the bottom of the excavation.
The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away
from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations,
slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Final site grading in areas adjacent to building should
slope away at least 2 percent, except where the area is paved. Surface drains should be provided
where necessary to prevent pondlng of water behind foundation or retaining walls.
GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL
All building and pavement areas should be stripped of surface vegetation, topsoil, organic soil, and
other deleterious material. It is important that existing foundation(s) be removed before site
development. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be
used as structural fill, but they could be used in non-structural areas, such as landscape beds.
Structural fill is defined as any fill, including utility backfill, placed under, or close to, a building,
behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soil needs
to support loads. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at, or
near, the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content that
results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill is very important and
must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process.
The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type selected, the compaction
equipment used, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. The loose lift thickness
should not exceed 12 inches. We recommend testing the fill as it is placed. If the fill is not
sufficiently compacted, it can be recompacted before another lift is placed. This eliminates the
need to remove the fill to achieve the required compaction. The following table presents
recommended relative compactions for structural fill: .
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
CadenHomes
July 27, 2007
Beneath pavements
Where: Minimum Relative Compaction Is the ratio, expressed In
percentages, of the compacted dry dansHy to the maximum dry
density. as determined In accordance with ASTM Test
Designation D 1557-91 (Modified Proctor).
IN 07270
Page 10
The General section should be reviewed for considerations related to the reuse of on-site soils.
Structural fill that will be placed in wet weather should consist of a coarse, granular soil with a silt Dr
clay content of no more than 5 percent. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve
should be measured from that portion of soil passing the three-quarter-inch sieve.
LIMIT A TlONS
The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as
they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil and groundwater conditions
encountered in the test pits are representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the
subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those
observed in our explorations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions
and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are
commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil
samples in test pits. Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such
unexpected conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly
constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to
accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all
projects.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Caden Horries, LLC, and its
representatives, for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and
conclusions are based on observed site materials, and engineering analyses. Our conclusions and
recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of
practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is
expressed Dr implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction
safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods,
techniques, sequences, Dr procedures, except as specifically described in our report for
consideration in design. Our services also do not include assessing Dr minimizing the potential for
biological hazards, such as mold, bacteria, mildew and fungi in either the existing or proposed site
development.
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
CadenHomes
July 27, 2007
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
IN 07270
Page 11
In addition to reviewing the final plans, Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be retained to provide
geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm
that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate
whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the general intent of the
recommendations presented in this report, and to provide suggestions for design changes in the
event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction.
However, our work would not include the supervision or direction of the actual work of the
contractor and its employees or agents. Also, job and site safety, and dimensional measurements,
will be the responsibility of the contractor.
During the construction phase, we will provide geotechnical observation and testing services when
requested by you or your representatives. Please be aware that we can only document site work
we actually observe. It is still the responsibility of your contractor or on-site construction team to
verify that our recommendations are being followed, whether we are present at the site or not.
The following plates are attached to complete this report:
Plate 1 Vicinity Map
Plate 2 Site Exploration Pia n
Plates 3 - 4 Test Pit Logs
Plate 5 Typical Footing Drain Detail
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
CadenHomes
July 27, 2007
IN 07270
Page 12
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions, or if we
may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Respectfully submitted,
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
Principal
DRW: jyb
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
stJIJffl POIHr
LAKE
GEOTECH
CONSULTANTS, INC.
• $
. COM/:
\ Job No:
07270
·,
. I ~ I ,
VICINTYMAP
3612 Meadow Avenue North
Renton, Washington
I Date· JuIY2007 I Plate: No Scale _
No SC~~ tBf
I ,-.. I
"
\
I
\
\
Legend
TP-2
1 '
I' ,
\ " ,
I ;
" ~
I
J
Site Boundary Line
'07" E 115,
- -'·"l '-TP·3
,
18
0 -----[jjJ
I ',-"
I
I
I
I LOT 1 I
~-~ 5 j BBO SF u-=Jmm_
.. , .. ,., Ho._ ~
," -rm-,'--=l
\,
........ WJ..L.,:J ("
-j~ TP·1
----184 _'. \
LOT 2 ". I
5,733 SF 1 \
\ \
\
'-.
Adjacent House I
"-
.~
\
--1
--1
~
~
lJ.J
i52 >-a:: ~ Q!i ..
) >-0
~ ..
.I:
W ~ w 0: e: III
1:1
W ..,
I--W a::
(,) z
0
(,)
[jjJ = Approximate Test Ptt location Ref: Teets Short Plat by Pa"fic Engineering Design, LLC
Dated May 29, 2007
GEOTECH
CONSULTANTS, INC.
EXPLORATION SITE PLAN
3612 Meadow Avenue North
Renton, Washington
!JobNo: 07270 ! Date· ! ~UIY 2007 No Scale I Plate: 2
" .
5
10
15
5
10
15
--------i-
l-
i-
i-
i-
i-
L.....
TEST PIT 1
Description
Sandy FILL with debris
fI~l~ I I I I I ~ I : Brown, slightly silty SAND, many organics, very moist, loose :::: :,:1:
1:lsp
lilsM I:r:'~' 1:1: 11:1: I I : I: I I ~ I ~ I -becomes more tan
Iii! :1:/:: No organics, very moist, loose to medium-dense II~ I ~ I: I: I IIII:I!' Some intermixed silt lavers 1I11I1
• Test Pit was terminated at 10 feet on July 17, 2007.
• No groundwater seepage was observed during excavation.
• No caving was observed during excavation,
TEST PIT 2
Description
-becomes more tan
,sP
'SM No organics, very moist, loose to medium-dense
'" '" Some intermixed silt layers II II
II II
II II
II II
II II " ,
* Test Pit was terminated at 10 feet on July 17, 2007.
* No groundwater seepage was observed during excavation.
* No caving was observed during excavation.
___ .. ..t GEOTECH
., CONSULTANTS, INC.
TEST PIT LOGS
3612 MEADOW AVENUE N
Renton, Washington ~~~t~$~~P~~~~===-~ Job No:
07270
Date: Logged by: Plate:
July 17, 2007 DRW 3
... -
i'"
i-
5 ...... ...
---10 -----
15 -
TEST PIT 3
Description
1m ' :TOPSOIL
11:1: I!:I: : Brown, slightly silty SAND, with organics, moist, loose :1:1: :1:1: , ,
SP : • becomes more tan
SM ,
, No organics, very moist. loose to medium·dense
:1:1:1:1:1: : Some intermixed silt layers 111111
• Test Pit was terminated at 6 feet on July 17, 2007.
• No groundwater seepage was observed during excavation.
• No caving was observed during excavation.
GEOTECH
TEST PIT LOGS
3612 MEADOW AVENUE N
Renton, Washington CONSULTANTS, INC.
Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate:
07270 July 17, 2007 DRW 4
· .
Slope backfill away from
foundation. Provide surface
drains where necessary.
Backfill
(See text for
requirements)
Washed KOI~K-l .....
(7/8" min. size)
Tightline Roof Drain
(Do not connect to footing drain)
Vapor Retarder/Barrier and
Capillary Break/Drainage Layer
(Refer to Report text)
NOTES:
L-_ 4" Perforated Hard PVC Pipe
(Invert at least 6 inches below
slab or crawl space. Slope to
drain to appropriate outfall.
Place holes downward.)
(1) In crawl spaces, provide an outlet drain to prevent buildup of water that
bypasses the perimeter footing drains.
(2) Refer to report text for additional drainage, waterproofing, and slab considerations.
4. ~~~t~~T~~=-==~~~
GEOTECH
CONSULTANTS, INC.
FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL
3612 MEADOW AVENUE N
Renton, Washington
Date: tate:
July 17, 2007 5
August 17,2007
TEETS SHORT PLAT
3612 Meadow Avenue N.
Renton, Washington
Drainage Narrative
Prepared for:
Darcey Teets
2838 109th Ave Se
Bellevue, WA 98004
(206) 391-1500
Prepared By:
Pacific Engineering Design, LLC
15445 53rd Avenue South, Suite 100
Seattle, WA 98188
Phone: (206) 431-7970
Fax: (206) 388-1648
Joseph M. Hopper, P.E.
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON
SEP 1 1 2007
RECEIVED
PED Job No. 06089
Drainage Narrative/or Teets Sh 'Iat 811712007
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Project Overview ................................................................................................................... 1
II. Off-Site Analysis .................................................................................................................. .2
III. Core Requirements ................................................................................................................ .3
IV. Erosion / Sedimentation Control Design .............................................................................. .4
-;o---=--=--;-.---;-----;c; .• ~-.... _-_ .......... _ ..
Pacific Engineering Design. LLC Page i
\\bJade1425\Raid\Project Files\06089 Teets Short Plat\06089 Drainage Narrative.doc
Drainage Narrative for Teets Sh lat 811712007 -----
I. Project Overview
Site Location
The site is located in Section 35, Township 24, Range 5E, W.M. in The City of Renton. Plat
name of the site is Hillmans Lake Washington Garden of Eden No.2, plat lot 122. The King
County Parcel Number is 3342700617. The site is more specifically located north of the
intersection of Meadow Ave. N and N. 36 th St., on the east side of Meadow Ave. N. The existing
lot size is 13,827 square-feet, which also equals 0.32 acres. The site is within the R-8 residential
zone in, in the Kennydale Hill area of Renton, west ofI-405. The site is accessed from Meadow
AvenueN.
Project Description
The site currently contains a single family residence with no garage or driveway. The south
portion of the site is a grade bench that is approximately 5-feet higher than the existing building
elevation. There appears to be the remains of a concrete pad on the bench where a detached
garage or shed once stood. The site slopes steeply from the south bench toward the existing
house. The site then moderately continues to slope to the north at approximately 5 to 8 percent.
The rear of the lot abuts the 1-405 right-of-way. The sound barrier wall for 1-405 is located near
the rear property line.
This project proposes to divide the existing lot into two lots using the Short Plat process in
accordance with City of Renton Municipal Code (RMC) Chapter 4-7-050. According to the
zoning requirements (RMC 4-2-11 OA) the minimum density allowed in this area is 4 dwelling
units per acre and the maximum density allowed is 8 dwelling units per acre. The total site area
is 13,827 square-feet according to King County Assessor's records. A 5-foot right-of-way
dedication is proposed along the frontage of the property, for an approximate area of 540 square-
feet. The remaining developable property is 13,287 square-feet.
Proposed Detention and Water Quality Facility
Detention and Water Quality facilities are not proposed for this project. The 1990 King County
Surface Water Design Manual allows an exemption from installing detention and water quality
facilities if the development is below the minimum thresholds. The new impervious surface
created by developing this property as described above does not result in more than 5000 sf of
new impervious surface.
The roof drains are proposed to be tight lined to the conveyance system within Meadow Avenue
N. The roof drainage will be conveyed across the site through perforated pipes. These pipes will
help facilitate groundwater recharge and will also provide a reduction in the release rate of
storrnwater from the proposed site.
Pacific Engineering Design. LLC Page J
\\bladc1425\Raid\Project Files\06089 Teets Short Plat\06089 Drainage Narrative.doc
Drainage Narrative for Teets Sh ">lat 811712007
II. Off-Site Analysis
Upstream Tributary Area
Off-site storm water does not currently enter the site and is not anticipated to do so in the future.
Downstream Analysis
The site is approximately Y, mile from Lake Washington. The site's stormwater runoff currently
sheet flows to the west toward Meadow Ave. N. where it is collected within a system of catch
basins and storm pipes and is conveyed to the north approximately 1 ,425-feet to May Creek. The
flow continues within May Creek in a northwesterly direction for approximately 1,140-feet and
outfalls to Lake Washington.
!,'4,'1'r·.",·'
.,.".! .. ,yJ'(~J
JJ4'!:~""'''Y
,
. '." .'~'~"-'J!'~'
X.'~!~~I~J W."! '~A>-'Itl ,".'.'~' '''-'''.'''
'f:."l.'.,"!·iJ -'<J.'~'YJ,~J'I
:J.'{'<:l\~'~I~ l.Ir.>"'!OIC~~ -'!4J!l'<Jt'.'1
... "I _",n Sf
" ~J_'~_'!'YJ:"'!>(,
, ~ II THZ!'''~:.tI !.·~_' .. ~%r!1 J.(4~"l(~~'! '
J34 ..... (1:',.'/ \,/lf8 ~~'
!J'''''ll%'-,.' ... ~
"" F\I.l!TIISI A""""";~N':'"
.
_" .•.•. ' •. "".'1; t
! • ,( .. ." ~ ,-F ' : {'
"{.',"'-W'" '~~.~:_~.,,-l..f) .·~!"."'$I!Y-'Ji
"""",.,,, '.-, -1.,·1"'"''''''''''
"41""'."'" ! !~J::-.~".14~ : !iI'J~YA'.'l'
-' '~-''"~'''-':'
'J4.';,~-,.'J:!
'~,'," I~'-,~:,
~d~~';RIC'"U
~~~9!j';iy'I."U ~~1I~R~J~'4:'
~~~~!,,\:J~J';~' e~!"''-'~I~'I.J''
Pacific Engineering Design. LLC
~ ~~:J~:~-"JJ:' ! 'I":'~':)(J! ~
,
J,H'fl':4~1
3.!-jJ.".x;4~e
~ 3u.'tJt;'):n ... :,
j •
... In'IS,
Downstream Map
(from King County iMap)
\\bladeI425\Raid\Project Files\06089 Teets Short P]at\06089 Drainage Narrative.doc
J~Y ,:·,,,,,, .. t{)!t>·l(·I-J
!3~lic'J,,~O JJ~""'~:"'.'; ,. ""'~.:; ~,\ .. ~"L::::;;
, .' .' i' J.",~' , •.
Page 2
Drainage Narrative filr Teets Sh. lat 811712007
III. Core Requirements
CORE REQUIREMENTS -SECTION 1.2 OF 1990 KCSWDM
1.2.1 CORE REQUIREMENT #1: Discharge at the Natural Location
The proposed project's storm water will be discharged to the drainage system lying within
Meadow Ave. along the frontage of the property.
1.2.2 CORE REQUIREMENT #2: Off-site Analysis
This core requirement has been addressed elsewhere in this preliminary report. Please refer to
the Off-Site Analysis Section (Section II).
1.2.3. CORE REQUIREMENT #3: Flow Control
Not Required. A perforated roof drain system will provide a measure of flow control by
infiltrating the stormwater into the ground.
1.2.4 CORE REQUIREMENT #4: Conveyance System
Roof drains will be collected and conveyed to the drainage system within Meadow Ave. N.
1.2.5 CORE REQUIREMENT #5: Temporary Erosion & Sedimentation Control
During construction of the infrastructure for the Teets Short Plat, temporary erosion control
methods will be implemented to prevent sedimentation and erosion using the methods outlined in
Section 1.2.5 of the KCSWDM.
1.2.6 CORE REQUIREMENT #6: Maintenance and Operations
This requirement will be fulfilled by the property owner until bonds have been released and
public drainage system(s) have been conveyed to The City of Renton.
1.2.7 CORE REQUIREMENT #7: Bonds and Liability
Bonds and insurance in accordance with City of Renton requirements will be provided by or at
the behest of the owner during site construction and until the construction has been approved by
The City of Renton.
1.2.8 CORE REQUIREMENT #8: Water Quality
Not Required.
Pacific Engineering Design. LLC Page 3
\\bJade1425\Raid\Project Files\06089 Teets Short Plat\06089 Drainage Narrative.doc
Drainage Narrative for Teets Sh {at 81/712007
IV. Erosion I Sedimentation Control Design
Erosion and sedimentation control will be provided by utilizing BMPs selected from the 1990
King Connty Surface Water Design Manual. These BMPs may include silt fencing around the
perimeter of the site, construction safety fencing, interceptor v-ditches, rock check dams, plastic
sheeting of stockpiles, straw mulch, hydro-seeding, catch basin protection, and a rocked
construction entrance.
A Temporary Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan is included as part of the construction
documents detailing the means by which sediment and erosion control will be handled during
construction.
Pacific Engineering Design. LLC Page 4
\\blade142S\Raid\Project Files\06089 Teets Short Plat\06089 Drainage Narrative.doc
PACIFiC L..r\IGII\lEERING DE:::iiGf\j ~ LLC ,,= =
CIVIL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS
August 20, 2007
Ms. Andrea Petzel
City of Renton
Development Services Diyision
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, W A 98055
Subject: Teets Short Plat
Construction Mitigation Narrative
Dear Andrea:
PED Project No.: 06089
On behalf of our client, Darcey Teets, the following is the Construction Mitigation Narrative for
the Teets Short Plat, as required as part of the City of Renton Short Plat submittal checklist
requirements.
• Proposed Construction Dates (begin and end dates): Fall 2007 -Fall 2008
• Hours and Days of Operation: Construction activities will be limited to the hours
between 7:00am and 8:00pm, Monday through Friday and 9:00am and 8:00pm Saturday.
[n addition, haul hours are limited to the hours between 8:30am and 3:30pm Monday
through Friday, unless approved in writing in advance by the development services
division.
• Proposed HaulinglTransportation Routes: 1-405 to NJOth Street to Park Avenue N. to
N. 38 th Street to Meadow Avenue N.
• Measures to be implemented to minimize dust, traffic and transportation impact,
erosion, mud, noise and other noxious characteristics: Water Truck, Temporary
Erosion Control Plan, Construction proposed during City of Renton permitted work
hours.
• Any special hours proposed for construction or hauling (i.e. weekends, late uigbts):
None
• Preliminary Traffic Control Plan: N! A. No frontage improvements proposed.
nc rely, ;/1h;J
. v/'
/ ' /
&e Hopper .' /7
roject Manager
cc: Darcey Teets
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON
SEP 11 2007
RECEIVEiJ
'iV\N\N. pace~~g. corn
......
-
FiLED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF,
Secker , Feilberg, P.S.
520 pike Street, 12210
seattle, WA 98101-4~05
AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO,
BECKER & E'EILaERG, P.S.
520 Pike Street 1221Q
SeatUe, WA 98101
BifHi'93263 iJasE:PH/J06NSU~
December
THIS EASEMENT is made and entered into this ~ day of ~r,
1333.
David A. Johnson and
(bereinafter "JohnBon"),
real properties:
Debra K. Johnson, husband and wife
are the owners of the following described
'l'ract 121,
Addition to
ill Vol':.lu.e
Washington
and
Billman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden
Seattle No.2, according to the plat thereof
11 of Plat&~ pil:qC €4, in Ring County,
(hereinafter "Parcel An)
Tract 122, Billman's Lake Washington Garden of Bden
Addition to Seattle No.2, according to the plat thereof
in Volume lL of Plats, paqe 64, in Ring County,
waBhington (hereinafter I'PaJ:eel Stt)
Johnson hereby grants the following described Basement over a
3 portion of Pareel B for the benefit of Parcel A:
s commencinq at the so~theast corner of Parcel B, thence
westerly to the BQuthfHeBt corner of Parcel B, thence
northerly aloog the western boundary of Parcel B 20 feet,
thence easterly aD feet, thenCe northerly 2 ,feet, thence
easterly to a point on the eastern boundary of Parcel B
22 feet from the point of beginning, thence 8ollther~y to
the point of ~eginninq.
The purpose of said Easement is
exclusive use of a garaqe located
in.gress and egresa to the garage.
EXCISE TAXNOi REQUIRED ~j/rj~
\
page 1 of 3
DEVELOPMENT P
CITY OF RE
NNINC,
ON
SEP 1 1 2 07
RECE!'J D
~I
,
\
i
i , ,-
].
"
,
i
I
!
\ ,
,~.
I
j
I
'=
==
o
•
~he owners of Parcel A shall be solely responsible for all coats
associated with maintenance, repair, remodel, and upkeep of the
~aBement and any structures located ther~on.
The only structure permitted on the EAsement is the existing garage
which is approximately 22.6 feet by 15.6 feet. Any remodel to the
existing garage shall be. done within its current dimensions {width,
length and height}, or in accordance with the mutual agreement of
the owners of Parcels A and B~
This Easement shall run with the lanQ and bind the parties' heirs,
successors in interest, and 8ssigns.
/44_ ~L.e-z,..
Debra K. Job or: .
eOUliTY OF )
STATE OF WA~ I B.,
On this day erscnally appeared before me David A. Johnson to
me known to be the individual described in and who executed the
within and foregoing instrument and acknowledqed that be siglled the
same as his free and voluntary act and deed for the Uuea. and
purposes therein mentioned.
AlVEN u't~!.J'Y hand and official .... 1 this 7' ~ day of
:i>~'i:X0~;;,:\: ' 199:~~~ . ~ :~.: . .t\~':!1~R"1\C:!J' ~PUbiiC in and for t e ,ate of
. 'u .~-",.::I:1s r3 h' ... 'd' t .. ' : .... p~'~n . .1' -,.; _.: ..... as ~n":li"0n! res~ ~g aL:j~Zi~~~ '-;.. \:;'.:-:"."" '" \tt': .•. ·,c 1 My COImlU.S8~On exp~res
". <!' ',.' lJ, ........ ;' '. () ' ....... \ .. .
•........ ~ 1t'J.5\~ .. /
Page 2 of 3
. " .
.. ..
,
I
I
1
I
j
I
=
..
o
•
, .. , ...
STATE OF WASHINGTON .s.
COtlN'l'Y OF ry
On this day personally appeared before ~e Debra K. Johnson to
me known to l:le the individual described in and whQ executed the
within Bnd foregoinq instrument and acknowledged that she signed
the same as her free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and
pu~poseB therein mentioned. ~'
./J _ m:~ my hand It;nd. official seal this
~ ,1993.
7' day of
I,:
ctary Publi n and for ~state of
washinqton! resid~nq at)[' < • r -4/
My ccmmisBl.On expl.res 6 -/,J . / ko
page 3 of 3
1
I ,
I ,
I
I
j
!
i
.-, I
',~ I ,
i
1
I
I
1 t
!
I
. ,.'
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON
Bill Quast, Eastside Title Unit Manager
Shawna R. Cruikshank, Sr. Title Officer
Mitch Huntley, Title Officer' Suzanne Desseau, Title Officer
Lisa Weber, Title Assistant· Rachel Bramsen, Title Assistant
Direct: (425) 283-1420 • (866)290-5196 • Fax: (425) 637-9820
Email: etu@rainiertitle.com
1120 112'" Ave. N.E., Suite 440, Bellevue, WA 98004
lP'iLAT ClERTJIlFICATlE
SEP 1 1 2007
RECEI'!ED
Order Number: 430623
Certificate Fee: $350.00
Tax: $31.15
This Certificate does not purport to reflect a full report on condition of title and shall have no
force or effect except as a basis for the Certificate applied for.
NOTE:No search of general taxes or assessments has been made.
This Eertificate isrestricled to the use ofthe adJressee and is not to be used as a basis for closing
any transaction affecting title to said property. Liability of the Company is limited to the
compensation received therefor.
Title to said estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in:
Denney 1. Teets, and Robin D. Teets. husband and wife and Doris J. Pease, as her separate estate
And is a Certificate for a Plat Certificate of the property described in Schedule A, attached.
Exceptions: See Schedule B, attached.
Records examined to: AUGUST 8, 2007 at 8:30 AM
Rainier Title,
By:
Agent for Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation
Bill Quast, Sr. Title Officer, Unit Manager
Page [ of6 Order Number: 43062g
SCHEDULE A
Tract 122 ofC.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition!o Seattle No.2, according to the plat
recorded in Volume 11 of Plats at page 64, in King County, Washington.
Except that portion lying within Secondary State Highway number 2-A.
End of Schedule A
Page 3 of6 Order Number: 430623
SCHEDULEB
EXCEPTIONS
I. Deed of Trust and the terms and conditions thereof:
Grantor: Denney J. Teets, and Robin D. Teets, husband and wife and Doris J.
Pease, as her separate estate
Trustee: First American Title Insurance Company
Beneficiary: PHH Mortgage Corp. fka Cendant Mortgage Corp.
Original amount: $366,225.00
Dated: August 31, 2006
Recorded: September I, 2006
Recording No.: 20060901000922
2. Relinquishment of all easements existing, future or potential, for access, light, view and air, and all
rights of ingress, egress and regress to, from and between the land and the highway or highways to be
constructed on land conveyed by deed:
To: State of Washington
Recorded: May 24, 1956
Recording No.: 4695952
3. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof:
Purpose: Use of garage and ingress and egress to said garage
Area affected: a portion of said premises
Recording No.: 9312102007
End of Schedule B Exceptions
Page 4 of6 Order Number: 430628
Notes:
A. Abbreviated Legal Description: Tract 122 ofC.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of
Eden Add to Seattle 2
B. Property Address: 3612 Meadow Avenue N.
Renton, Washington 98055
Page50f6 Order Number: 430628
PRIVACY POLICY
We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information
In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certrun information. We understand that you may
be concerned about what we will do with such information -particularly any personal Of financial infDlmatioo. We agree that you have a right
to know how we will utilize the personal information you provide to us. Therefore, we have adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and
handling of your personal information.
Applicability
Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing, the types of non public personal infonnation that we may collect include:
• Infonnation we receive from you on applications, forms and in other communicalions to us, whether in writing, in person, by
telephone or any other means;
• Infonnation about your transactions with us. our affiliated companies. or others, and
• Infonnation we receive from a consumer reporting agency.
Use ofinformation
We request infonnation from you for your own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffiliated party. Therefore, we will
not release your information to nonaffiliated parties except (1) as necessary for us to provide the product or services you have requested of us; or
(2) as permitted by law. We may, however, store such information indefinitely, including the period aftcr which any customer relationship has
ceased. Such information may be used for any internal purpose, such as quality control effons or customer analysis. We may also provide all of
the types of non public personal infonnation listed above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include financial
service providers, such as title insurers, property and casualty insurers, and trust and invcstment advisory companies, or companies involved in
real estate services, such as appraisal companies, home warranty companies and escrow companies. Furthermore. we may also provide all the
information We collect, as described above, to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies, or
to other financial institutions with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketing agreements.
Former Customers
Even if you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you.
Confidentiality and Security
We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your infonnation. We restrict access to nonpublic
personal information about you to those individuals and entities who need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We
will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your infonnation will be handled responsibly and in
accordance with this Privacy Policy. We currently maintain physicaJ, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federaJ regulations
to guard your nonpublic personal infonnation.
Page 6of6 Order Number: 430628
Order No, 430628
7tl11!11 soaa
..;-~$'
lOT 2 '14~& .... . ,
" "l;;'~
u:rr ,-,.
)07 ':o~ un if JJ6ID 5F
<>110 ....
"EN51' 1'''~' ~ LOT<$3-• •
11m SF
04'"
112U9'
..."
N, 31TH BT.
,'-, .
2
.,,~ ... ");~ .. .• , {~ .. .~ iUD SF
HOG SF .... -:;"'" '. '" -..
1120 -112th Ave. NE. Suite 440, Bellevue, W A 98004
Phone (425) 637-0193 -. Fax (425) 462-6010
t
N
./11 ,
, H I
~ .:'"
,
~ ... ~ 1\ I ' !~1-1ml SF ; .. '*'
, ,,;-'" , ">~~
I
\~m ,f " I ~~. .... \, ", ,.,
, r:,: ,
I " .,
"1:"'''' , " 10'$~ Sf '" •• .,.., ... ,
~~i\\l¢ I
" .. t~
,
_.
This sketch is provided without charge, for your information. It is not intended to show all matters related to the
property including, but not limited to: area, dimensions, easements, encroachments or location of boundaries. It is
not a part of, nor does it modity, the commitment/policy to which it is attached. The Company assumes NO
LIABILlTY for any matter related to this sketch. Reference should be made to an accurate survey for further
infonnation.
AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF
PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN
City of Renton Development Services Division
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055
Phone:42~7200 Fax: 425-430-7231
DEVELOPMENT PLANNINC'
CITY OF RENTON
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)
COUNTY OF KING )
SEP 1 1 2007
RECEIVED
))1t-1?fE'/ ·It lee-iS .., being first duly
sworn on oath, deposes and says:
1. On the ;-if day of £ -if' / ,20 tI ?-, I installed ---::;"..1_ public Information
sign(s) and plaSticti1erbox on ~ located at 3G./.6 mea/llu) Ifrl "" for
the following project:
Project name
'b6JA:J~y fief)
Owner Name
2. I have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an ·x· to indicate
the location of the installed sign.
3. Thislthese public information sign(s) wasJwere constructed and installed in locations
in conformance with the requirements of ;pter 7, TiDe ~mzn Municipal ~~e~ .. __
Installer Signatur
SUB~~~~N ~to before me this /~i ""'''' A.~. r--, 2D • 2~.
. • .. "1--'" -J v \ ~ \.. .o"";·L~C :.% iLL j( ~.H6-v 'I./~'}(r"-){. iJmf.«'
~ .. ? ::~'~::~Q .. -< v~ .. --NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State Washington,
•••••• II' A III \ • ~..... residing at '&J k y'4( W ft-
-"·'"H" ... ''''''' , My commission expires on Z -J 1· J 0 .
Q:\WEB\PWIDEVSERV\Forms\Planning~lIbsign.doc 0512006
Printed: 09-06-2007
CITY OF RENTON
1055 S. Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
----------
Land Use Actions
RECEIPT
Permit#: LUA07 -101
Payment Made: 09/06/200702:26 PM Receipt Number:
Total Payment: 1,000.00 Payee: D. TEETS
Current Payment Made to the Following Items:
Trans Account Code Description Amount
5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 1,000.00
Payments made for this receipt
Trans Method Description Amount
Payment Check 1007 1,000.00
Account Balances
Trans Account Code Description Balance Due
3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee
5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees
5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers
5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat
5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees
5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review
5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat
5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat
5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD
5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees
5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment
5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks
5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone
5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt
5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev
5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval
5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use or Fence Review
5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees
5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee
5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend
5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies
5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable)
5954 650.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits
5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage
5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax
Remaining Balance Due: $0.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
DEVELOPMENT PLANNW",
0,ITY OF RFNT')~! '.
SEP 1 1 2007
iiECEIVEO
R0704724
VICINITY MAP ----Tl-:-Cs.----
N 40TH ST
LAKE
WASHINGTON
ST
ST
~I 34TH ST
z z ~ N 32ND ST
-<t:
f-. ~
z
So o a -<t: w ::;
I/-1i'iS ITE
! -$-tJ N 30 TH -<t: ST z~~~~~--~+~---
u:: ::.:: ::> u::
CIl <{
D..
CERTIFICATE
I (WE) HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM (WE ARE) THE OWNER(S)
IN FEE SIMPLE OF THE LAND HEREBY PLATTED IN THIS SHORT
PLAT.
DARCEY TEETS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
)SS
COUNTY OF KING )
ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME ________ _
_________ TO ME KNOWN TO BE THE PERSON(S) THAT EXECUTED
THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT SAID INSTRUMENT TO
BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED OF THE SAID PERSON(S), FOR
THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED, AND ON OATH STATED THAT
THEY WERE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE SAID INSTRUMENT.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL THIS _ DAY OF _______ , 20o_.
-----------------NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE
OF WASHINGTON RESIDING AT _________ .
APPROVALS
CITY OF RENTON
EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS ___ DAY OF _______ , 200 __ .
-----------------
ADMINISTRATOR OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
KING COUNTY -.---------
EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS ___ DAY OF ______ , 20o __ .
DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR
DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS
DEPUTY KING COUNTY ASSESSOR
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PORTION OF THE S.E. 1/4, N. W 1//4, SECTION 32] TWP. 24 N.,
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
FOUND MON. IN CASE
VISITED MAY, 2007
I 1
, 1
---Tl -
.
LO
C\1
--t--
N 38TH ST
RGE. 5 E., W M.
29
N. 1/4 CORNER-----a. ...
SEC. 32-24-5
FOUND MON. IN CASE
CITY OF RENTON # 1834
N: 196744.338 FEET
E: 1303747.970 FEET
I
r---------------------------~~~v,-------+---------__________ ~I
20' 20' '::..
20'
""'"
25'
FENCE
1.8' S--,
I 3.6' W
FND IRC # 11332
0.09'S & 0.03·E
OF CALC. COR.
La'r 1
COVERED
Fs I3.5' CHAIN CONCRETE\
LINK FENCE EAVE~~
I II (S SS'42'07"E 11:5.79'-SP 194/11) '\ SHED
to ~-L2 ~,v S 88'44'07', E 115.66' .', •. -.L
o \ --1{~~,~~~~~~~.~~~.~~~.~-125.00'
-{----~ I I I 1 , -1:0.66'-
5' RIGHT OF WAY _
DEDICATION -1----..:+--;;~-l5d' 1 0' FRO~lT '" '.RD ov~~~fNGJ'1
--(
"'--FENCE
1.0' S I
5' RIGHT OF WAY
DEDICATION ----
-
gr2
"'~~ I G 0::
1
~IO V BSBL (TYP) 2.0',. I ROOF
. f-I-! Ct) I~;OVERHANG \0' (/) a· I") I LOT 1 10 [2.0'S :::::
.-I ~ "! ~ U') II [;j SET IRC #21 464 ~ ~ 0) g: :; r' '(.., r--. 2.0' OFFSET co ~~ := ~ L <'>' {~ " ~
!:>-[J) I") N "\ () " I 8 I 1'"'\ g; I
;:>-I ~ i'J <t: "! I Y --.J I ~ 4J cr 8 ~ ~ I ~ 0:: ~ ~~I~I -_____ ~S....;8;::8;:.;· 4~4:...;' 3:;:.::3::...··.·~-E=____:.~1 O~7:..:;. 9~2;,.' ___ ......;_:,.;_~I, ~ ._~I
-<r: 'Ol (I)!~ ,.... lj \ 1--z,-<:'Inc-VI,;::;:: :· ... ~~-.i?" ~ I ~"; ~ t ""', ~ ~ I o~ _~'-.;-I ~ --'I~-,nl";U .:J"'DL \,.j i II'~~! ~ ~I
,.c::; ~ ., I 20' R:AR YA?D ;: I'~ ~
[J) ~ • I BSB~ (TYP.) ~.I . /<') 0 '-" ~~ C 0 (Xi ~I OJ :.:-CONC. SOUND (/) I
-0 (/) I'i LOT 2 ~ 0 BARRIER WALL
[J) U') I I U') en
5' L-_____ J II
20'
I I I I
I L1 \ \ I ,... -.... --. 105.' 9' _ \ I
25'
-
•
\
I
11ti o
~
N
cW
25'
20' 20'::"
\ N 88'45'01" v; , 111.:~, / -7
~FENCE 6 WO'JL~ FENCEJ I r'
0.2' S FENCE 0.4' S . '
FND IRC #11332
'-0.17'S & 0.11'E
OF CAl_C. COR. LOT 1
LOT 2
--{---1
125.00'
FND IRC #11382
0.19'S & 0.15'E
OF CALC. COR.
EAST LINE OF N.W. 1/4
SECTION 32-24-05
\ I .....
\ I I I , I ====~~~~~·=~~~~~~~~~rt~F1/~~~==~~~~\1
S .6"5"22" E 660.17' J V
Ww
I 'lo • 010
I ~ {:;
..q--..t-o
, -.,... o Co)
Zz
'-'
TRACT 122 OF C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTLE
No.2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PlATS AT PAGE 64, IN
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
SEC. 32-24-5
FOUND MON. IN CASE N J
32 1\ CITY OF RENTON #266
EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN SECONDARY STATE HIGHWAY NUMBER 2-A.
S URVEYO H' S_..QERTIFICATE_
THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER
MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SURVEY
RECORDING ACT AT THE REQUEST OF DARCEY TEETS IN MAY, 2007.
RECOHDER~~EHTIFICATE_
FILED FOR RECORD THIS __ DAY OF ________ , 20 __ AT
__ M. IN BOOK _____ OF ______ AT PAGE _____ _
AT THE REQUEST OF RODNEY G. HANSEN.
N: 191429.837 FEET
E: 1303590.024 FEET 5
('-'-------T-E-.E-T'-S-S-H-O-R-T-P-LA-T---------r---
PREPARED BY:
It :3. E. 1/4, N. W. 1/4, SEC. 32, TWP. 24 N., RGE. 5 E., W. M.
CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
CITY OF RENTON FILE No. LUA 07-101, SHPL-A ,. ~-------'""T'---------'""T'----------t .,
Ii DWNBY: 5/14/0'7 PJC DATE: JOB NO. 20'714
j
~----------------~-----------~-------------~
0'
SHORT PLAT NO.
LUA-07-101-SHPL-A
LND~ xx-xxxx
N
I
1" 30'
30' 60' -------- -
NAD 1983/91 BEARING
SITE ADDRESS: 3612 MEADOW AVE N ..
RENTON, WA 98056
ORIGINAL. TAX PARCEL # 3342700617
LEGEND
.... = SECTION CORNER
I = QUARTER CORNER
~ = FND. MON. IN CASE
o = FND. PROP. COR. AS NOTED
• = SET 1/2" I.R. W/CAP #21464
@ = SET PK W/FLASHER #21464
(COR) = CITY OF RENTON
(R) = RECORD
(P) = PLAT
BSBL = BUILDING SETBACK LINE
SURVEY MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE REQUIREMENTS
OF WAC 332-130-090.
EQUIPMENT USED: 5" TOTAL STATION.
SURVEY METHOD: FIELD TRAVERSE.
RELA llVE POSITIONAL TOLERANCE OF SET CORNERS: +/-0.1'
LOT AREAS
LOT 1 5,880 S.F. OR 0.14 Ac. + /-
LOT 2 5,733 S.F. OR 0.13 Ac. + /-
R.O.W. DEDICATION 538 S.F. OR 0.01 Ac. +/-
TOTAL AREA 12,151 S.F. OR 0.28 Ac. +/-
NEW LOT ADDRESSES
LOT 1 xxxx ~A::::ADOW AVE N, RENTON, IVA 98056
LOT 2 xxxx MEADOW AVE N, .REN 7 0N. IVA. 98056
LINE
Li
L2
NOV 1 2 2008
RECEIVED
llNE TABLE
BEARING DISTANCE
S 88'45'01" E 20.00'
S 88'44'07" E 20.00'
EXPIRES: 1/31 /10 ~ ) "JI";N
LATEST REVISION: 09/02/08
HANSEN SURVEYING (J;1,'I .• rJ i,i/:1.i ,
LAND SURVEYORS & CONSULTANTS /, .•. iJ ~A~~~A~N~SE-N--======
CERTIFICATE No. 21464
MANAGER SUPT. OF RECORDS
\
; CHKD BY: RGH SCALE: 1"=20' SHEET 1 OF 1
17420 116TH AVE. S.E., RENTON, WA 98058
TEL: 425-235-8440 FAX: 425-235-0266
I
~------------------------------------~-------------------------------------.--------------~----------------------------------------------------------------------~
.. .
.,
.,
' ..
I·
" '"