The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReport 1PARTIES OF RECORD PRACTICE FACILITY PIER LUA07-137, SM, ECF Michael Cero 8300 Avalon Drive Mercer Island, WA 98040 tel: (206) 419-0657 eml: mscero@comcast.net (party of record) Joe Burcar Department of Ecology Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program 3190 160th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 tel: (425) 649-7145 (party of record) Steve Jansen 5021 Ripley Lane N ste: #4 Renton, WA 98056 eml: smjansen@msn.com (party of record) Elya George Baches 1414 N 34th Street Renton, WA 98056 (party of record) Steve Gregerson 5021 Ripley Lane N ste: #302 Renton, WA 98056 (party of record) Barbara Paxhia 5021 Ripley Lane N ste: #104 Renton, WA 98056 (party of record) Updated: 01/02/08 Thomas F. Peterson Socius Law Group PLLC Two Union Square 601 Union Street ste: #4950 Seattle, WA 98101 tel: (206) 838-9112 eml: tpeterson@sociuslaw.com (party of record) Brian T. Sabey 5021 Ripley Lane N ste: #304 Renton, WA 98056 eml: bsabey@comcast.net (party of record) Eleanor Maargo Kennamer, President Misty Cove Condo Association 13005 162nd Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059 eml: margok@msn.com (party of record) Aaron Belenky, President Williamsburg Condo HOA 1800 NE 40th Street ste: #H-4 Renton, WA 98056 (party of record) Lance Lopes Qwest Field 800 Occidental Avenue S ste: #100 Seattle, WA 98134 tel: (206) 381-7835 eml: lancel@seahawks.com (party of record) Shelly Munkberg SECO Development 1083 Lake Washington Blvd N ste: #50 Renton, WA 98056 (party of record) Thelma Sutherla nd 1205 N 29th Street Renton, WA 98056 (party of record) Jared Salstrom 5021 Ripley Lane N ste: #213 Renton, WA 98056 eml: jared. salstrom@villanova.edu (party of record) Eileen Halverson 16226 Crystal Drive E Enumclaw, WA 98022 (party of record) Roger A. Pea rce Foster Pepper PLLC 1111 Third Avenue ste: #3400 Seattle, WA 98101-3299 (pa rty of record) Elaine Wine Vulcan 505 Fifth Avenue S ste: #900 Seattle, WA 98104 tel: (206) 342-2397 eml: elainew@vulcan.com (party of record) Larry Ba rsher 6940 96th Avenue SE Mercer Island, WA 98040 (party of record) (Page 1 of 2) ... PARTIES OF RECORD PRACTICE FACILITY PIER LUA07-137, SM, ECF Tom Ehrlichman Socius Law Group Two Union Square 601 Union Street ste: #4950 Seattle, WA 98101 (party of record) Jim Levin Bayley Construction 8005 SE 28th Street PO Box 9004 Mercer Island, WA 98040-9004 tel: (206) 621-8884 eml: jimlevin@bayley.com (party of record) Alan Foltz, Agent Waterfront Construction, Inc. 205 NE Northlake Way ste: #230 Seattle, WA 98105 tel: (206) 548-9800 (contact) Thomas F Peterson Socius Law Group Two Union Square 601 Union Street ste: #4950 Seattle, WA 98101 tel: (206) 838-9112 eml: tpeterson@sociuslaw.com (party of record) Updated: 01/02/08 Richard Wagner Baylis Architects 10801 Main Street ste: #110 Bellevue, WA 98004 (party of record) Tom Chiado Vulcan (Chiado LLC) 505 Fifth Avenue S ste: #900 Seattle, WA 98104 tel: (206) 550-8363 eml: tom@chiadollc.com (applicant) Football NW LLC 505 Fifth Avenue S ste: #900 Seattle, WA 98104-3179 (owner) Jeffrey Taraday Foster Pepper 1111 Third Avenue ste: #3400 Seattle, WA 98101 (party of record) Brian Dickson Magnusson Klemencic Assoc. 1301 Fifth Avenue ste: #3200 Seattle, WA 98101-2699 (party of record) Michael Creegan 1236 S Director Street Seattle, WA 98108 (party of record) (Page 2 of 2) --I Ci,-!I i iii I " r ! [J) » z 0 " r:::< C'l ::0 :::r:: -< 0 ::0 0 [J) C'l C'l 0 ;;::: X (t) :::r:: 0 ::0 C'l , Z C'l N 0 Z C'l -U );: z -l (t) 0 :::r:: C'l 0 C , !Cl ~~ ~~ ~~ ,,,0.< ~~ ~ '-"-r I- I r· i" I: i " i .I,ll,' \....j~ ,.' > \j::, Y P! ,c,J,J; r-·j(; :~l(_~ lor\ / . "'<,·71-" /~', .' ," ,'.,,' .... \2/1 )/\ +/~\ , .."." 1-:'" "-/' .. J '. ~-: 1 ___ . ,:~T.\' '. \ C) ')/7----.~> __ / ---~>,_// ro' -'\" :.~'. \. I /---, ( , "_ ,_ '-' 1 ,'. \ : \ J! \ -i 'I .• \A ()'. 3rT .\'/!. I\.) ''-/ .. \ __ ,;( ,:""11 ,I' -....\. / "---,' " :, -'\ (' ',\ . .1/.: \-(~ -... + ,-' " , .. " . \ \ \. / \ t p' '-./f' L)" ,I I I '-, • .c~:>~> '1/. "-..[c-{ -I l \~ /, "." " J ':):\ ~, j-.:):=:i',r __ :\ t < + )~ __ \:--_1 ___ ) f\. ,.--j .,), '.--/''''~. t, " '''',;X Q"') .:7'0 "",'/:\,_Jr+,1 \;-t,+) ( C .:;."<_,/ .. -......,;-'-"'<./ I \-j + .}\~. j--,\ ",'! " _. ': ;': _, I ,/ _ -,.~// \\ ' "'I .. --(, ---/--,,-J-'~..\, " ,,~-)'~/--\ __ ,. ':_ _ ':" ::' __ "':() 't' ,(---~ ,j . \ '/-.~,I_"-_"-y'-,j V ".J l I: 'J 'J : ... ~)7" \1 /---~ /1 + ; ' __ 'e'. ' • .,~., ':\ . ,,>,\ / " "'.~ ',' ~J'-"--r-i __ ;. - . \ n -"I ,\,-'\ .J ., // .", \ \. --/~--,I u l, ',',----'\ i,li ! 'I r .. ~J\ ,-,j >,----,,\ 0 )'~--r 'V~ \,_, ___ /i \ / 1 '--.., \ ______ J I ,--, \'/c'.....,. ,----\ ~ .~--" <, ,_, ) .".. '< 'oj )i " ~ /i I \ + '0--"'_"'/ (~\~>-~j ,.I-$-\ //"--~" ,y __ ~\ ~ / __ \,.,_~,)~: .... 1\:=:../ /-;--:7< + :! " c, 'I '\ e;, '. ( 0 'c--I! "'j -c 'i-.j.' 0-_:_,( \~, )'------c~\-j ',,; -I', /-. ,""-:" l~\',-/,-----;' .r;r"'1.'---y-c:, . \\,) \> ,~; /' \{ '.-.' ')::' r, i \ ._, f -\~,/-~\, 1 I C) i--~" ,';1 -\, j , lj ! ,~'"0-../( 'I /----;<=:.: I !,~-'\ ",---"'..._,r'\ '. ',)) \... ) __ ' ! t., ," r , ~ j. II { '-" i " _,,/",/L,. /- ./ , __ , \<---,.. -~:~ (>/!Hr)\ --z ~ ) 'J--I/o,,'I'c ,-.'~--;-"l '\ ~ \"--:.J-\.,-"~'-'"~ /--\ <:) '\, '~, / \~-j \...~--) \~-~) ~\ -H,_'"---'--IS! Y ~~AJ-I 1-t··jC T[I/?LAT 2DO:~ c;:- -~ .. _',",.1 C) ,~,.I" "'-·'w", ~~. ,,~, , o !lIG I O["·ISITY p,iF.Me s: CU'! ,-I' ; __ , ---,-.. ~:lL::-;ll ,.-fJU'.\ T<'; S::-CTI:'::~,I i'" ---«------', r'----( , ~:;:.-< _ . .-C..,rr--" r:--', i,.,_).~t=~~-'· /(~:i"\j ,lj '------;/-,~:;-i'- ~--,Q<?-~~~'>-) >~<~>~},) 'j~i~~~; 'I \ <~'1{~~ j '/)''''/~\ j ~ ", ( 0 } /'-'~'<,- • 0 .(" /-::"7.!,~_j ~ __ <~,-~O) \"~-<----~-'-:I (-;:":>-<~ \, /' 0 1 :~~>~<' '----oj' Il,~. i ______ ) i I I I ="I1;'-'! -J\-t' 'c l + I . ,....----><\j : + i(, ' ',·~::~]T~·I "7\A L c j' _ , Y--\-j , . , ;-'! ',,,J '--', /-..... ' ; I' (-f., ( \. j '~-~~" ~_J ('--\( a )/-j -f.. -, [ I ',' Y-C'i<-: I "~\",~,,., + ----="(~ -f ') i' +)[+::.... I r" j.--__ " / ,,,-___ ~,( , '. '" 0;1 r 1 " 0 ;.' ;;.c:':,: l':;;\~i,\ < '-....--"r 0-):-\ 'I J: ~ --'--' , ~ <--:-;--'c::.---/-" ) (0 \to ') J I,,'j,,',l~) 'I' '7'':\ (\ ' ) '''.r-___ , _\ ,/, __ '--'I 1 , ____ ,;_ ~:J~ . , ) o (),lI D["i,'ITI TCi-:IPLA.T[ ';CIIWJ,: 0 U'il jl~SlTv PLic\ill'iC F 1,IP,iITE 20Ge SF , 'I" '.-__ oi!I i!! Gl t;., CU:"::: ::\= "'<.) "0'" ","- GlOl Ie (/)·c '" .-~ ~ ",f- J:: ~ [fJ Zo "0 ". :. I; "'~' ~:;:i ~,,-; " , ~" PRIC !--IG&. PER'~ITSET ~ "'""''',. I' l{~~~g2 I o ""---------- T'Tj Ii» = v: I C /C ~ c --, z e (~ -; ~ , " , -< !l-~-""Z 'c_~ ! '--- ; --, , , , , , ".1 () , Vl -, '" , " z U C) 'U :-:1 I c.. Z " , ~> Z ~ /1 " V n (' :::; Z - T; , ,> L C: V' ~ , c:: , I I J-- f-I' 1 " t I I t " I Seahawks Headquarters & Training Facility 5015 Ripley Lane N Renton. WA 9BO~~ I ~! ,,-. too' ~: I' I" , I ' --"1; . II: II , , I __ f--- , , \ \1: " "I § " '\ '. " , • ~ , \ ~ APPL""cATIO~j" ii<lAwlI'iG ~uMIiER~2~<U_D, 1 ( ( ~ .. J > / <\ '------, --17-i 1/ / ii J i j@ ./ / 1/ , , / / , , / , / P~~Jo -NAIIf: H)LH~~r. CARl.< ::J,[ OC ':51 ,,-g 8 G !i! III , 1--/ . --] , If I { I ~-:":::,.~ " ,",," --/;;.:'~ ("~" /' /,,<,' , I' ~ (/ [~5"% " ''& e ,(:~" ~ ~OA1~~_~ U HI " ' ....... IHTA~m //'v"" 'c·"OYI '2;~ \ .... , ~ ~ / {S ""'" "-""'~ / , (H. ) :~ ;,,_ ./ / ~,> " {"'" """A"'~ '~,,''';~~'' '/ (~''''' 7"';~'\' ('" ... ! ('.J'-.." / ':F~i~~~C/ '-",,,] /,O' il ,~ /1 ........... ",'''Ce" >. , p.,' ,," ,< , V -" ~"" rf' <<¥Y' t( "'" _'. "/ 259/ ,/ ~,I/ // y( I," / I "/ " / ~' 7,," /7 "'s""., I ""';, /--/ ,~' "", 0" I I ~, '~'" I / PARCeL. 29?'1 ~)5 CJC' ~ I l'.. '"', \ , ' I~~ O"W ,c ~ ~ ~ .t .' fEi: ("J P?OPOSEO 0 '>TE.o" I)A--,P,O ':I~) ~I:C~ ___ " DErAIL VIEW sc:.oJ..[: 1".10' ~ ~;~,~~~~5F:'~/~"~~-./ .:>C. OHW. " ,%" E~15T1NG ~"llHU:NI ~ JO' I~ i ~' ~: III ~ \'\ + ," II L l·\";;~C;""' ,\' ""' ",n ,'<eM" 'C" '\ "I "j! "qf" '"'''''''' ,"--.. " ''.i, 'i" li\ _ _ i!\h' le:;;;" IF 1 Af=-::--==r,05', ,7" ,'II .~\I"' ,'11' ',' 1"-C " '" ' , "',,',' /"" '-_ ,,1.1_._':,,-,-' __ .c.~._.c.--' ---c,"----'-,-' ,.~,:. >_." ,--- ElEVATION VIEW 10' 5' ~'() W' ZO' sc.o,u:: 1·~10' J))~" .! ,. --5"'~"-'-'-'-----""j 2,4 Mll£~ @ ,-. 8-C/C "'AX STAINLE~S STFL , ~ /~"" '~O~' ""'"' -i I '*'== -, "l1'iIl'-& -~g,~~~,'~'~" ,:IT' t ~" ~" _ ,\ '\ 1'--'" IAG"OIT r ~'~ NAL(",~ C / 6 O/f. I,Ax ¢"G~TINr. .. ', /_'-, ~~~'~"5,~ SFI I ' [,' ,~' __ :;(:::---F1""C","," fF,,' ,,,"q;" -;:"--," '" ., ~ "",< _ . '. r +". GALV ", .:....,- It " I)., / /. ... i TYP) '/4" /\/ " 1/;; I ,;e ",,,7,: ~Il7l,f,' "= , t--I~,," ''"'' ",,,",,, / "" J;:1 IT" I '''"' / _.<: o· COA1:D "" , -: '1<' ,.... 1//11/ /' ~< \ /;;;/ // I ,f PlAN VIEW :;0' 25" O' W" '00' SCAlE, '"gOO' "~lf:RIA_ Sf 1-,~~L j~~-fi ~~~C~h-' ---j EP0i~j~~ , '-A'>~. "5~'M ~ -r,:,,:,_'.'~ IL',h> <",' ;~-::~~~fllTP.---~~;~--- • ~-" ;JI, ", 1 i7 )~-""c7A--- , 7",' ~R A:::1A \-,'-p ell ~ ~ --ACIA .L'll: "ft',~:r ,:;;.RU-=-;LC"J-!--~~ ------;-;-;;::~,~~5 OR G~~,,-: ! PROPOSED SECTION VIEW A-2 SCALE. 1"." ~'-~~"------:i,~ ,~AI_.'R @ ~TAINlrc,s ~T[i:~I_~-"/B'"X12- R 8/~ "~;o:.. PA,,~G / D,CK SP~o\'S L ('L~ 1..'.1.< 8"'''' I Jk ',0 ,,,5i':::=,,"~==-J'(:~c>'[:\')'"'''" ~ 7' ole IH~" frud. Il'" JOIST' \ \....~'~ I ,~G,P W/ '/2",7'" GAl" PROPOSED SECTION FRAMING A-2 lAG a~.~ c I': ~v; " ~. 0' " SCOJ.E: 1"_1' PROPOSED SECTION SH F"l P 1I~r; 5C\LE: 1-1/2"~~ B-2 r 3 -~----------- I :>"~Ml~':: ,;_'/B"~'2~ I / I~" r:/c ~A<. ';-AI~l'~C, ~TI]/ ~.u-'-" B~M ~,R~II% //-~CEC~ ~CR,\\,S _L/ * I ,~._ ~'L~ co,,~o~ I-=. c:c~,. 1/' ",,, (~e) r~7",~~i,---!(:; ~~6 ¢ ?' ~/c ~,. 3,4 .i;CCOr. ....... II/ "/,",7" CALV L!I~ BO~T @ '6-Ole PROPOSEtI SECroM FJW.IING 8-2 ~. J" 0' l' SCOJ.E: 1~1/2"-1' 1 H~ ""IS ~~ ~~ ?,~~ ~ 1<' '" i Ii; ~~:I ,~ ~ :i f"' ~ ,~ ~'~ I J ,r :~~ j i I ' ; I :>; , ~ ~ ;A ! ~~ ! ~: ~ lUi: :g 10 :.", ::> ~o, i> t,; II'."'· c I~ :~ (§ ~ ~ If:' i'-' ~ II ',I , " !6:; :~ I~ i~ i~ !~ I~ i~ I ~~ I 'M' I ' 't. I ~~t ~::01 ~~~ Seahawks Practice I< Project Source of Condition Condition Compliance Shoreline with Pennit Construction Mitigation Plan Haul hours Code are limited to 8:30 am to 3:30pm Monday through Friday Construction Code hours are from 7:00 am to 8:00 pm Monday through Friday. Construction hours on Saturdays are from 9:00 am to 8:00 pm and no work on Sundays. cc: LUA07-137 Project File Chip Vincent Neil Watts Larry Meckling Kayren Kittrick Jennifer Henning Arneta Henninger Gerald Wasser ty Pier Conditions of Development }nmary) LUA07-137 When Party Responsible Notes/Completion Compliance Date is Required During Applicant Construction shall construction take place during fish window, July 16 - Dec. 31 During ApplicantiContractorlBuilder Construction During ApplicantiContractor/Builder construction STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AI<'FIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King County, Washington, The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County, The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period, The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on March I, 2008. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of S75.6O. /--FJ?J?.t4 /'/,l//'dL..- bihda M. Mills Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter Suhscribed and sworn to me this 3rd day of March, 2008. ~! e State of Washington. Residing NOTICE OF APPEAL HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHI"IGTON An appeal Hearing will be held hy th~ Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chamber1> on the :o.evenlh l100r or Renton City Hal!. 105S South Grady Way, Renton, Wa~hington, on March 11,2008 at 9:00 AM [0 con~ider the following petitions: Scahawks' Headquarters and Practice Facility Pier Appeal LJiAQ7-137,$M. ECF Location: SOlS Ripley Lane N. An appeal of Ihe Determination of Non- Significance by the City of Renton Environmental Review Committee regarding the Seahawh Headquaners ami Practice Facility Pier has heen filed. Legal de~criptions of the file~ noted above are on file in the City Clerk's Office, Seventh Floor, City Hall, Renton .. <\11 interested persons arc invited to be present at the Public Hearing to expre~s their opinions. Questions "hould be directed to the Hearing Examiner at 425-430-6515 Published in the Renton Reporter on March 1,2008. #52752. "'''\\\1\" It, ...... ,... :tHY D. /'" §" ~"''''''\.'\\''IIII ~(n.'~ -;?:"'''' _'0.., '1" "..t\ 'i -~ .,.~.,. \'..:" 'l :: ~ ~OT .. _ ',,... ~ - -.... .... ~ \II '-:=; ~ ~~ ~ "'cn~ ...... "'::: ." ~ -I ~ .. ... roE ~ ~ ~ ~ /' C;.UG :f E " ..... () "'-'>.-'"', ,.-'" '19 11 ,--" -'/0'" -........... 0.::: ~ ~ 111111\\\\"" A\ _ 1111/ 11.-,q S H\\'IC> ............ .::-'I , ...... "'1111\\"" CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: July 11, 2008 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: LUA (file) Number: Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Acceptance Date: Applicant: Owner: Contact: PID Number: ERC Approval Date: ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Approval: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: • Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Mylar Recording Number: ,--, ,_ .'.i'-~'·-·.':''''''-'_'''''_._'' __ -'' ___ 4 _____ '-_'_'_''''_. __ '''''''". " ... ,-=. _-"~" ' .. ", ,~..".,.,.~.,...._,,_ Seahawks Practice Facility Pier LUA-07-137, SM, ECF LUA06-073 Practice Facility Pier Elizabeth Higgins / Gerald Wasser November 19, 2007 Ray Colliver, Vulcan Football NW LLC Alan Foltz, Waterfront Construction, Inc. 2924059001 December 10, 2007 December 31, 2007 April 21, 2008 May 15, 2008 Date: Date: , Project Description: The applicant has requested and Environmental Determination and Shoreline' Substantial Development Permit for construction of a new pier (dock) to be located on Lake; Washington. The pier would be associated with the Seahawks Headquarters and Training Facility. ' The west end of the pier would be 150 feet from the edge of Lake Washington. The pier would be 5 ' feet 10-1/2 inch wide, except for the east 30 feet of the pier, which would be 3 feet 10-1/2 inches; wide. The pier would replace an existing 6-foot wide, 123-foot long dock that would be removed. j Location: 5015 Ripley Lane N Comments: Site Plan Review process not required and refund of $500.00 was requested 12./17/07 . . 12/31/07 -Appeal on the ERC determination received from Socius Law Group on behalf of the Misty Cove Apartment Owners. Scheduled to go to the Hearing Examiner on March 11, 2.008 3/2.8/08 -Settlement agreement reached between Misty Cove Association of Apartment Owners and Waterfr'?~t Construc~~~.~~o~ball N.W.l::.U~ a~~.Se~.ttl~"~eaha~~~;J\Rpe~.I~,:,,,1t~2..r~~D~.._ .. ~ .... _ .. _. . .. .. ~. , >1" , Ii: , .. .1-," ·~UU{' STATE Of WASHII\GTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office. 3190 160th Avenue Sf' Bellevue, Washington 98008-5452' (425) 649-70()() April 30,2008 Waterfront Construction Attn: Alan Foltz Football Northwest, LLC 205 NE Northlake Way, Suite 230 Seattle, W A 98105 Dear Mr. Foltz: I certify that I mailed a copy of this document to the persons and addresses listed herein, postage prepaid, i a r~.eptacre for United States mail in I (~ v Washington n (; Subject: City of Renton Pennit # LUA07-137 -Approved Football Northwest, LLC -Applicant Shoreline Substantial Development Pennit # 2008-NW-10015 Purpose: Notification of Receipt of Approved Substantial Development Permit (SDP) On April 24, 2008, the Department of Ecology received notice that the City of Renton approved your application for an SDP. Your pennit is for replacement of an existing 123' x 6' pier with a ISO' x 4' -6' pier within shoreline jurisdiction of Lake Washington. By law, local governments must review all SDPs for compliance with the following: • The Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW) • Ecology's Substantial Development Pennit approval criteria (Chapter 173-27-150 WAC) • The City of Renton Local Shoreline Master Program Local governments, after reviewing the SDP for compliance, are required to submit the SDPs to Ecology for filing. Your approved SDP has been received and filed by Ecology. What Happens Next? Before you begin activities authorized by this permit, the law requires you to wait at least 21 days from the date we received the decision letter from the City of Renton on April 24, 2008. This waiting period allows anyone who (including you) disagrees with any aspect of this pennit, to appeal the decision to the state Shorelines Hearings Board. You must wait for the conclusion of an appeal before you can begin the activities authorized by this pennit. Waterfront Construction April 30, 2008 Page 2 of2 If no appeal is submitted you may begin activities any time after May 15, 2008. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if they receive an appeal. We recommend, however, you contact the Shorelines Hearings Board before you begin permit activities to ensure no appeal has been received. They can be reached at (360) 459-6327 or http://www.eho.wa.gov/Boards/SHB.asp. If you want to appeal this decision, you can find appeal instructions (Chapter 461-08 WAC) at the Shorelines Hearings Board website above. They are also posted on the website of the Washington State Legislature at: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac. Other federal, state and local permits may be required in addition to this shoreline permit. If you have any questions about this letter, please contact Joe Burcar at 425-649-7145. S;"1'~ Joe'L, Shorelands Specialist Shore lands and Environmental Assistance Program JB:cja cc: Gerald Wasser, City of Renton CITY ~ F RENTON April 22, 2008 State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 3190 160th Ave. SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator SUBJECT: Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit for File No. LUA07-137 Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed is the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the above referenced project. The permit was issued by the City of Renton on April 21, 2008. A Determination of Non-Significance was issued by the City's Environmental Review Committee on December 10,2007. The appeal period ended December 31,2007. An appeal was filed on December 31, 2007 of the threshold determination and has since been withdrawn. We are filing this action with the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General per WAC 173-14-090. Please review this permit and attachments and contact me at (425) 430-7382 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, ~~ Gerald C. Wasser Associate Planner Enclosures: Administrative Decision Copy of Master Application Project Narrative Neighborhood Detail Map Notice of Application Notice of Publication SEPAChecklist SEPA Determination DNS Advisory Notes cc: Office of Attorney General Alan Foltz I Applicant Football NW LLC/Owner -TILe~tlertllO~S~talenB~eE~.am~c------------------------------~ 1055 Soulb Grady Way c Renton, Washington 98057 * This paper contains 50% recitded material, 30% postronsumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION NO.: LUA-07-137, SM,ECF DATE RECEIVED: November 15, 2007 DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: December 17, 2007 DATE APPROVED: April 21, 2008 TYPE OF ACTION(S): [X 1 Subslantial Development Permit Conditional Use Permit Variance Permit Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, the City of Renton has granted a permit. This action was taken on the following application: APPLICANT: PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEC-TWNP-R: Alan Foltz; Waterfront Construction, Inc.; 205 NE Northlake Way, Suite 230; Seattle WA 98105 Sea hawks' Headquarters and Practice Facility Pier The applicant has proposed construction of a new pier to replace an existing pier. The existing wooden, float pier is 123 feet long by 6 feet wide, held in position by 12-inch wood piling. The existing pier would be completely removed. The new pier would be located approximatley 210 feet south of the existing pier location. The new pier would be 150 feet long and between 3 feet 10.5 inches and 5 feet 10.5 inches wide. The full open grate deck would be supported by 18 steel pilings of 6-inches in diameter. The deck surface would be a minimum 2 feet 6 inches above the Ordinary High Water Line. All in-water construction activities would take place during the allowed fish window, July 16 through December 31, 2008, as determined by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. The new dock satisfies the requirements of RMC Section 4-3-090L.12.g of the Shoreline Master Program Regulations which address the design criteria for recreational, commercial and industrial docks. The submitted plans for the new dock indicate compliance with the specifications of this provision of the Renton Municipal Code in terms of length (150 feet), width (12 feet or less), and location (no closer than 30 feet to a side property line). S29-T24N-R5E TAX LOT "BAXTER PARCEL NORTH" RENTON LUA-00-044 LLA REC NO 20010105900005 WCH IS POR OF SW Y. 29-24-05 L Y WL Y OF BN RR CO RNJ SW 11, of Section 29, Township 24N, Range 5E WITHIN SHORELINES OF: APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM: Lake Washington City of Renton The following section/page of the Master Program is applicable to the development: Section 4-3-090.H Description Urban Environment Page page 3-25 Development of this project shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with all conditions by the State agencies and all conditions provided in the application and modifications submitted to the City. 2. Compliance with the Construction Mitigation Plan, submitted by the applicant, dated November 15, 2007, is required. This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Action of 1971 and pursuant to the following: 1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal, state, and other permit requirements. 2. This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Section 14(7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee fails to comply with any condition hereof. 3. A construction permit shall not be issued until twenty-one (21) days after approval by the City of Renton Development Services Division or until any review proceedings initiated within this twenty-one (21) day review period have been completed. Neil Watts . Date Development Services Director Exhibi5ts: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Proposed Location of New Dock 3. Shoreline Zone Planting Schedule 4. Photograph of Lake Washington Shoreline (looking south from existing dock) 5. Detailed View, Elevation and Section Views of Proposed Dock c: Attorney General's Office Applicant / Owner / Contact Yellow File \ \. , / ) , \ \ ! / '\ i J \ J r t::::rl \ \ t\ \ ;---. i I 1 i i i r LAKE WASHINGTON .CA ,.~ ... fA C4 • 32 T24N R5E W 112 o 200 .. EXHIBIT 1 ~ ZONING ____ ........ ."LIml .. '0 = 'I'I!CHNlCAL SERVICES 1=-'800 29 T24N R5E W 1/2 -5429 I ~==~==.~------~~--- z ~.~ 0 <..i ~8 f= "~, '-:8'" £; "'~ ~§! W: <ON li. .,~J. • i'~ ~~~ " ~O !& :g U W ::!.. ·U-p~e ,. .. ~~ " ~S! >~" " ~ ~: ~ ~ ,'Il 0 8 " S' ~~ ~~~&1 " :fn~:\!!z '" "11:'" j~ N~ ~3~~ \ I , , 1 J 1 , , 1 , , 1 , , I: , , , 1 --------------------------1 ,. ~ ~ __ ~', ______ ~'L'~_.' I· j, , <...11 ,.; 0 riO q, '" c:: z 1 ,-,-, i. I N 0 Z C'l ""0 , » z --; " ..: Existing Lake Washington shoreline looking south from the existing dock. Dimcnsionallumber and trash will be removed from the lake. EXHIBIT 4 e 1~£iM-!-l'~ ~ 3 ,~l~ ql ~ ~i'" ~ , < ~ ~~: ~ ". I ~~~~~ ~;;O;;~~ p~~~':'; ~~:{;a~ ~ •• '?~~~ g~~F 9 ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;. ~ ~ i c " . q • ~ " o " ~ , 0 5 ~ ~ ~ i'; ~ ~ ~ I:! ~';~~ ~).!;:;~~ ~ 8 8 ~ '" 0 ~ -. 0 ~ '" '" , 0 ~ '" q ~ 0 .l', % -. ~ ~ " z Q " " >-I '" ~~l ~S§ ,-~~ 0< !:<x· '~ o~;;l 1-o:~ -I ~". ~ ;;1 '!;; ~ J 1 I ~ ~~ r S ~ ;: ~ q .", I ~ m , :t >< ::::c .... ~~l ca ~3~ ~~ ~. ~t '0· .... o"! C,' ~~ , . ;, ~~ <; -I ',,,, -" -0 r' a ~ U1 ri ~ I / "'~,. --,- II f/ , ~ '" 0 ~ 0 '" '" ~~ '" ,g '0 z " lE >-I '" ~ :i ~~ ~ / / , l " -....---- " )-:u n c-r N CD N, " 0 ,". co 0 '-" -",,-~ , ~ -0:':: ~,~ r~- I~: ~~ "0 ° ' ~ .. . , g s;- tl 2. ~~ t'lr.i ~~ '" p ~i<; ~! ~~ ~, "< -r -I .;~ ~~~ z 0,.. "" '" "g r ~o .&,. \ ~~ ~~ ~" '"p ,~ o· 0' ~, E !:<.< ~, ~". (.t", .'<<' ' -,p' <; ~ / /' , , SOCIUS GROUP March 28, 2008 VIA E-MAIL AND U.S. MAIL Hon. Fred J. Kaufman City of Renton Hearing Examiner 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W A 98057 :..>06.800 .•• ) Il:U 1,,'/,) Lin,c.,' ;,,-"'" (,':]1 1~'nl')Il 51 :~._ k / ?~,C SI~"III(: '.V.A. (~H II) Thomas F. Peterson 206.838.9112 tpeterson@sociuslaw.com Re: Misty Cove Association of Apartment Owners v. City of Renton. Waterfront Construction, Inc., and Football Northwest. LLC a.k.a. Seattle Seahawks; LUA07-l37 Dear Mr. Kaufman: Misty Cove Association of Apartment owners, appellant in the above-referenced matter, has entered into a Settlement Agreement with respondent Football Northwest resolving all of the issues in this appeal. Therefore, in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, Misty Cove Association of Apartment Owners hereby withdraws its appeal and requests that the hcaring in this matter set for Tuesday, April 1, 2008, be stricken. If you have any questions about this matter, do not hesitate to contact me. v," ,Ie fOfZ-T om~Y Peterson cc: Ann Nielsen, Attorney for the City of Renton Roger Pearce, Attorney for Football Northwest, LLC 2726R _, () C i I! _,! Ii II,' ,I) I!I Fred Kaufman -Re: Misty Cove Assocition " . lartment Owners v. City of Renton, Wate • t Construction, Inc., and Foot Page 1 From: Fred Kaufman To: Erin Knobler Subject: Re: Misty Cove Assocition of Apartment Owners v. City of Renton, Waterfront Construction, Inc., and Foot All correspondence with this office regarding pending land use applications must be part of the public record. Your email and this response will be placed in the official file. Please refrain from replying to this email as that would generate another series of printouts and replies. >>> "Erin Knobler" <eknobler@sociuslaw.com> 03/28/08 2:50 PM »> Mr. Kaufman: Attached please find correspondence from Thomas Peterson of our office regarding settlement in the above-referenced matter and a request for the April 1, 2008 hearing to be stricken. Please note that counsel for the parties has been copied on this e-mail. If you have any difficulty opening the attachment or need anything further, do not hesitate to contact me. -Erin Knobler, Legal Assistant Erin Knobler SOCIUSLAWGROUP PLLC Two Union Square 601 Union Street, Suite 4950 Seattle, WA 98101.3951 Direct Dial: 206.838.9134 Direct Fax: 206.838.9135 www.sociuslaw.com IRS rules require that certain standards be met when written tax advice is given by attorneys before a client might qualify for tax penalty protection. Any tax advice in this communication is not intended to be used, nor should you use it, for that purpose. If you wish to have an opinion that may assist you in obtaining penalty protection, please let us know. In such a case a special written engagement with our firm is required. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information intended only for the recipient named. If you have received this message in error, please delete it from your system without copying it, and please notify the sender by reply electronic mail or by calling 206.838.9134 so that we may correct our records. Thank you. Fred Kaufman -Misty Cove Assocition of A -le_nt Owners v, City of Renton, Waterfront'-' nstruction, Inc" and Football N?m\lrlWl From: To: Date: "Erin Knobler" <eknobler@sociuslaw,com> <fkaufman@ci.renton,wa,us> 3/28/20082:49:43 PM Subject: Misty Cove Assocition of Apartment Owners v, City of Renton, Waterfront Construction, Inc., and Football Northwest, LLC a,k,a, Seattle Seahawks; LUA07-137 Mr. Kaufman: Attached please find correspondence from Thomas Peterson of our office regarding settlement in the above-referenced matter and a request for the April 1, 2008 hearing to be stricken, Please note that counsel for the parties has been copied on this e-mail. If you have any difficulty opening the attachment or need anything further, do not hesitate to contact me. -Erin Knobler, Legal Assistant Erin Knobler SOCIUSLAWGROUP PLLC Two Union Square 601 Union Street, Suite 4950 Seattle, WA 98101,3951 Direct Dial: 206,838,9134 Direct Fax: 206,838,9135 www.sociuslaw.com IRS rules require that certain standards be met when written tax advice is given by attorneys before a client might qualify for tax penalty protection, Any tax advice in this communication is not intended to be used, nor should you use it, for that purpose. If you wish to have an opinion that may assist you in obtaining penalty protection, please let us know, In such a case a special written engagement with our firm is required, This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information intended only for the recipient named, If you have received this message in error, please delete it from your system without copying it, and please notify the sender by reply electronic mail or by calling 206,838,9134 so that we may correct our records. Thank you, cc: <asnielsen@seanel.com>, <pearr@foster,com>, "Tom Peterson" <tpeterson@sociuslaw.com> CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING April 1, 2008 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: Seahawks' Headquarters and Practice Facility Pier Appeal - (Continued from March 11, 2008) LUA07-137, SM, ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: An appeal of the Determination of Non-Significance by the City of Renton Environmental Review Committee regarding the Sea hawks Headquarters and Practice Facility Pier has been filed. PROJECT NAME: Adkison Hobby Kennel License Appeal PROJECT NUMBER: LUA07-091 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant is appealing the administrative decision to deny the Hobby Kennel application due to insufficient justification for the denial. HEX Agenda 4-1-0B.doc RECEIVED MAR 3 1 2008 Renton City Council CITY OF RENTON March 31, 2008 Honorable Denis Law . Members of the Renton City Council 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Rei Mi.str ~Appql.LUA07-137 Dear Mayor Law and Members of the City COWicil Office of the City Attorney Lawrence J. Warren SeIIIor AuistlUlt CIty Attorneys MorkBarber ZooettaL.FOIIta Assistant City Attorneys ADD s. NIeheD G ...... N ... so .. n Sha ... ·E. ArtIo.r It is my pIcasure to infunn you that aU the pu:ties in the above-referenced matter (the Appellants Misty Cove, Applicants Seabawks and the Respondent City of Renton) were able to successfully coOrdinate their efforts which resulted in a withdrawal of the appeal prior to what wOuld be along protl'<lCted hearing. . As you are probably aware, this latest appeal by Misty Cove c:baIIenged the SEPA determination ofaDNS for the proposed ISO foot pier at the Seahawks Practice Facility. Misty Cove had previously challenged various proceedings with respect to Seahawks' land use related applications. This hearing was originally scheduled a-D)OIIIh." but, the City kept in contaet with attorneys for both Applicant and AppeUantto8SgeSS the status of the appeal. When the City Attorney's office learned that there was a possibility of sett1ement between Applicant and Appellants we assisted in efforts to continue the appeal to allow the partifis time to negotiate and come to terms. The City AttOmey'soffice was able to help faCilitate continuaooe issues while keeping abreast of the likelihood of seUlailent. In doing so, we were able to keep legal costs minimal and hold off ~ping up costs.in pieparatioh of a hearing. We simply requested from the Appellants, a separate letter withdraWing their appeal once the settlement was reached This letter was presented to the Hearing Examiner last week to strike the hearing scheduled for this week. Although the actual settlement agreement between the Misty Cove and Seahawks is not part of the City record, it is our understanding that the terms of that agreement also includes language wbich precludes Appellant fiom any further appeals related to this pier. As the construction of the pie!: is Sti1I subject to Sboniline Master Program permits, there was a likelihood that there would be further appeals wbich would have necesSitated additional work by the City Attorney's Office. Now, those potential appeals have been negated. -Post-Offi-ce-~--626-.--Renton,--W-M-hin-gton--9""80S-7---(4~2-S)-2S-S-'-86-7-8-' F-AX-(4-2-S)-2S-S--S4-7-4~ ~ . *' n.JIIIPI'I"~5O%~~:3O%pcliItconuner . AHEAD OF THE CURVE Mayor and City COlDleil 03/31108 p.2 The City Attorney's office continually strives to look fOl' altemati.ve resolutions short ofa costly hearing or trial. Al~ contin!lBnM' are often1ivwned up and 1Wnecesswy delays, we have found that allowing the parties time andoppOrtwJ.ity to air grievano;:es and attempt negotiations often results in a more desirable result than a contested hearing which only leaves open further avenues of appeal. If you have any. further questions, please feel free to contact me .. Sincerely, ~Vl.-· ..;----.... Ann Nielsen Assistant City Attorney cc: Jay Covington .. ", . --.-----------'----------- Fred Kaufman -RE: Seahawks Practice Facility Pier; LUA07-137 From: To: Date: Subject: ----~-~~ ---_.- Fred Kaufman Ann Nielsen 3/13/2008 8:27:25 AM RE: Sea hawks Practice Facility Pier; LUA07-137 All correspondence with this office regarding pending land use applications must be part of the public record. Your email and this response will be placed in the official file. Please refrain from replying to this email as that would generate another series of printouts and replies. >>> "Ann Nielsen" <asnielsen@seanet.com> 03/03/08 3:17 PM >>> Mr. Examiner, On behalf of all the parties involved in the above referenced matter (Respondent City of Renton, Appellant Misty Cove, Applicant Sea hawks), we are seeking a continuation of the hearing currently scheduled for Tuesday, March 11, 2008. As set forth in Mr. Peterson's email below, if the resolution can be finalized by the end of the week, Applicants will submit a notice of withdrawal of the appeal, thereby negating the need for the March 11, 2008 hearing. Thank you for your understanding. Ann Nielsen Asst. City Attorney From: Tom Peterson Imailto:tpeterson@sociuslaw.com) Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 3:08 PM To: asnielsen@seanet.com Cc: Roger Pearce; fkaufamn@ci.renton.wa.us; nthompson@ci.renton.wa.us Subject: Sea hawks Practice Facility Pier; LUA07-137 Ann: I have spoken with Roger Pearce about the hearing set for March 11 before the Renton Hearing Examiner. As I mentioned, Mr. Pearce and I are in the process of drafting a settlement agreement, which would include a dismissal of Misty Cove's appeal. We agreed that if there is no final resolution of the matter before the March 11 hearing, it should be continued to enable us to either finalize the settlement or prepare for a later hearing. Page 1 Fred Kaufman -RE: Seahawks Practice Facility Pier; LUA07-137 Therefore, it is agreed that the March 11 hearing will be continued or, if we have completed our settlement by then, stricken entirely. If you have any questions about this matter, do not hesitate to contact Roger Pearce or me. Best regards, Tom Peterson Thomas F. Peterson SOCIUSLAWGROUP PLLC Two Union Square 601 Union Street, Suite 4950 Seattle, WA 98101.3951 Direct Dial: 206.838.9112 Direct Fax: 206.838.9113 www.sociuslaw.com <blocked::http://www.sociuslaw.comirs/> IRS rules require that certain standards be met when written tax advice is given by attorneys before a client might qualify for tax penalty protection. Any tax advice in this communication is not intended to be used, nor should you use it, for that purpose. If you wish to have an opinion that may assist you in obtaining penalty protection, please let us know. In such a case a special written engagement with our firm is required. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information intended only for the recipient named. If you have received this message in error, please delete it from your system without copying it, and please notify the sender by reply electronic mail or by calling 206.838.9112 so that we may correct our records. Thank you. Page 2 Fred Kaufman -Re: FW: Seahawks Practice Facility Pier; LUA07-137 -"" --------- From: Fred Kaufman To: Date: Subject: Tom Peterson 3/13/2008 8:27:07 AM Re: FW: Sea hawks Practice Facility Pier; LUA07-137 All correspondence with this office regarding pending land use applications must be part of the public record. Your email and this response will be placed in the official file. Please refrain from replying to this email as that would generate another series of printouts and replies. >>> "Tom Peterson" <tpeterson@sociuslaw.com> 03/03/08 3:10 PM »> From: Tom Peterson Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 3:08 PM To: 'asnielsen@seanet.com' Cc: 'Roger Pearce'; 'fkaufamn@ci.renton.wa.us'; 'nthompson@ci.renton.wa.us' Subject: Seahawks Practice Facility Pier; LUA07-137 Ann: I have spoken with Roger Pearce about the hearing set for March 11 before the Renton Hearing Examiner. As I mentioned, Mr. Pearce and I are in the process of drafting a settlement agreement, which would include a dismissal of Misty Cove's appeal. We agreed that if there is no final resolution of the matter before the March 11 hearing, it should be continued to enable us to either finalize the settlement or prepare for a later hearing. Therefore, it is agreed that the March 11 hearing will be continued or, if we have completed our settlement by then, stricken entirely. If you have any questions about this matter, do not hesitate to contact Roger Pearce or me. Best regards, Tom Peterson Thomas F. Peterson SOCIUSLAWGROUP PLLC Two Union Square 601 Union Street, Suite 4950 Page 1 Fred Kaufman -Re: FW: Seahawks Practice Facility Pier; LUA07-137 Seattle, WA 98101.3951 Direct Dial: 206.838.9112 Direct Fax: 206.838.9113 www.sociuslaw.com -------- <blocked::http://www.sociuslaw.comirs/> IRS rules require that certain standards be met when written tax advice is given by attorneys before a client might qualify for tax penalty protection. Any tax advice in this communication is not intended to be used, nor should you use it, for that purpose. If you wish to have an opinion that may assist you in obtaining penalty protection, please let us know. In such a case a special written engagement with our firm is required. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information intended only for the recipient named. If you have received this message in error, please delete it from your system without copying it, and please notify the sender by reply electronic mail or by calling 206.838.9112 so that we may correct our records. Thank you. Page 2 Ann Nielsen From: Sent: To: Subject: Tom Peterson [tpeterson@sociuslaw.com] Monday, March 10, 2008 4:27 PM Ann Nielsen; Roger Pearce RE: status Attachments: Thomas F. Peterson (tpeterson@sociuslaw.com).vcf Ann: Page 1 of 2 I would appreciate it if you would ask for a continuance and represent to the Hearing Examiner that Misty Cove wants the continuance, Please let me know if there are any problems, Best regards, Tom Thomas F. Peterson SOCIUSLAWGROUP PLLC Two Union Square 601 Union Street, Suite 4950 Seattle, WA 98101.3951 Direct Dial: 206,838.9112 Direct Fax: 206.838.9113 www.50ciuslaw.com IRS rules require that certain standards be met when written tax advice is given by attorneys before a client might qualify for tax penalty protection. Any tax advice in this communication is not intended to be used, nor should you use it, for that purpose. If you wish to have an opinion that may assist you in obtaining penalty protection, please let us know. In such a case a speCial written engagement with our firm is required. This electroniC mail transmission may (ontain privileged and/or confidenlial information intended only for lhe recipient named. If you have received this message In error, please delete it from your system without copying it, and please notify the sender by reply electronic mail or by calling 206.838.9112 so that we may correct our records. Thank you. From: Ann Nielsen [mailto:asnielsen@seanet.com] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 4:23 PM To: 'Roger Pearce'; Tom Peterson Su bject: RE: status Importance: High HI there, I just called and left message at HEX office asking whether he was granting the continuance or whether he wants me to show up, or wants all of us to show, etc He just got back today from 2 week vacation so his asst said he was gOing through various cases, etc. I will plan on going to hearing tomorrow morning at 9 a.m. Not sure whether either of you want to waste a trip down here, and I'm happy to represent to HEX tomorrow morning that this is an agreed upon continuance among ALL the parties. Generally, he IS hesitant to grant continuance when it causes undue delay to Appellant, but since 3/10/2008 Misty Cove is also seeking continuance. I don·t think It should be an Issue. Cal! me on nw cell (206) 890-4319 If either of you need to reach me in morn. From: Roger Pearce [mailto:PearR@foster.comj Sent: Monday, March 10, 20089:49 AM To: Ann Nielsen; Tom Peterson Subject: RE: status We are circulating a settlement agreement Subject to final language. we have agreement on terms. Hopefully we will finalize today If not, I will send joinder In request for continuance to HE. From: Ann Nielsen [mailto:asnielsen@seanet.com] Sent: Monday, March 10,20089:12 AM To: Roger Pearce; 'Tom Peterson' Su bject: status Importance: High Hello genttemen, Page 2 of2 I was out of office on Thurs/F ri -just checking on status of agreement -I was going to call the HEX office later today re tomorrow's hearing. As discussed, if you all do not have agreement fonmalized yet, I'm not sure whether HEX still wants to formally open and continue hearing. If so, I will just appear tomorrow on behalf of all parties to request continuance, that way you both can save trip down here. Ann Nielsen Ass!. City Attorney Renton (425) 255-8678 asnielsen@seanet.com CONFIDENTIAU TY NOTiCE m,s a-mail. incfuding any attachments. is contidential and may include privileged informa/lOn. If}Qu are {lot the intended recipient OJ believe you have received this e-mail in elTO{ please do flat copy_ print. forward. re~transmit Of otherwise disseminate this e-mail. its contents. Of any of its attachments. Please delete this e-mail_ Also. pJease notify the sender that you have received this e-mail in etmr. Thank you. 3/10/2008 03/10/2008 14:50 FAX 8G FOSTER PEPPER VIA FACSIMII ,I,: i\·1r. freu J. Kaut;nan Ilcaring Examiner City or nenlon 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W~shingtol1 98057 Rc: Misty Cove v, City or Renton Appealuf Detemlinat;on of NOl1signilicllnl'e City No. UI:\07·137, ~M, EC'l' Iknr Kaulinan: Ii!l 002/003 RX·t;E1VED MAR 11 2008 CITY OF RENTON I1~J~I~,ffi1<AMINg~, "",,,/ .. We rcprcs(OI)t n:sponJcnt rootball Northwest 1 .. Le d/h/a Seattle Scahnwks ("I'NW") in th" :,buve-reJcrenecd appeal of a City of Rentl'll Detcnnin:.lt;oll (,I' NonsigniliedliLT. Ms. Ann Nielsell represents co-respondent City of' Renton, and Mr. Tom l'elerSl'1l rl'presents peti"""cr Misty Cove AssociatioJllli"Apartmellt OWI1(:rs ("Misty CI)I'C"), FNW alld Misty ('pvc 1l,1YC rt:adJ<:u an agreemenl 011 terms to settle the appeal, and we nrc cirl'lIlating a settle'''''llt agreement. The ,,,tlic:lllenl would not obligate the City !ll take any actions, and the City has no objeetHlJI to tlie settlement. The S(,ttlelllenl would include a dismissal oft.he appeaL In order to give the parties time to conclude the language "ftlle sdtlcment agreement, \V~ resp~drlllly request Ihe Examiner to poslponc the hcarillg to an open date 011 the Examill(:r's I'utlln: calendar. While w(: believe the writkn agreement will be cOllcimkd shortly, w<: request a two week postpollement. We ulluerstand that b(llil the City ,l)ld Misty Cove agree (HI a postponemen I, Very truly your~~ Roger A. Pearce cc; Ann Nir.;.~Isen, Esq. Tom Peterson, I~sq, 03/10/2008 14 50 FAX ~ FOSTER PEPPER VIA FACSIMIU: Mr. FI'"d J. Kalllintlll Hearing Ex~miner City of Rcntnn 11155 South Grillly Way R~nton, W(1shington l)S057 1\1al'<:11 In. 200X Rc: Misty Cove v. City of Rcntlll1 Appeal of Determination (If Nonsignilic'lllce City No. LUA07-137, SM, Eel' Dc;,., Kaufinan: ~ 003/003 Dill" I Ph,,! .• , (,:I.h~) -l4:'·.jI,i"!, I)L[<'I"I hl\'~'lJIHk' P!lI",! :-·t9 I'ILI/ We l\'prcs~nt rcspoJl<.knt Football Northwest LLC dlb/a Seattle SC;lhmvk, C'FNW") in the "bovc-rdcrclln:d appeal of:1 Cily (If Rentnn Ddcnniniltion nf Nnnsignilicance. Ms. AnI! Nielsen represents co-responrknt City of Renton. and Mr. Torn Peterson represents petitioner Misty Cove Association nfApllrtlllcnl Owncl's ("Misty ClOve'''). FNW and Misty Cove haYe n;acllcd an agreement Oil t"nns te> settle the appenl, and we are <.:irculating a scttkmcnt :w,reenwnl. The set!ktnent wOllld not obligate the City to lake aIlV ~,-.' " ~ ~ actions, and the City has no objection to thc sclllcmcnt. The sCllknK'nt would include a dismissal (If the appeal. III on.lcr to give the partic.~ time to condude the languJgc (trlh" settlement agrccrl1enl. we cc'spcctfully request the Examiner to postpone the hearing to an OpCI1 date on the. Examiner'~ future caktldar. While we believe the wrillen tlgrccment will he c(\tlclud"d shortly, we request a tW(l week postponement. WL' underst'lIld that hnth the City and Mist)' Cove agree nn ;1 postponement. Vcry truly your::-;. FOST[:.R PEPPER PLLC r--\~~~L. ROglT A. Pearc<: ec: Ann Nielsen. Esq. Tom Peterson, Esq. 03/10/2008 14 43 FAX @E] FOSTER PEPPtR ... FACSIMIU:: TRANSM1TTAL SHEET March 10, 200R 10 FAX NUMBER: Fred J. Kalilinan 425 4~O-652~ From: Rllg~r A. Pearce Direct Dial: (206) 447-4676 Direct Fnx: (206) 749-1997 At1:)chments: Letter Number oj" I'ages (Inclll<.ling this cover page): ., User & ClkntlMaltcr Number: 0487 76lJ3R-20 1:{c!lIrn to/Location: .\.,·57 VOICE CONTACT: VOICE CONFIRM: (425) 430-6515 0 y~s 0 No 11" 1'011 1111 ,,[ QlTI:STTONS lU:GARlJIN(; nIT: TlVlNSMISSI()N Ol""llllS 1",1 X, J'U:AS1~ C( )N'lACI' TN r.; I ~,\X PUlA U /,,\-I'.:N'1' ,4 T (10M 44746()(1 1i1l001/003 THI. INf()IUI.1ATI(JN C'ONTAINUJ IN FillS IACSIMII.! CClMMlINIC1TJON IS PI\J1!lLEGH>,'IN[>!OR CONrmCNTlIli. INfORMATION INTENDED ONI.Y FOR THE liSE Of EIlCH INfl/VIVI.IAI. (li( I.NTrn ,"IIMID MlOVI:. IF TIIC Ilrll[>[/1, or IHlS CO\/U~ (1/IJ .. ;r: IS NO 1" ,'1N IN n,:NUID /\I:CJJ.'II:NT, '(nlJ /H~ I, J 1I.:Uc/?Y NCrI'U"JU) THAT AN''( J.)JS,q::MJNA'I'lON, IIlSTlUIlIUION (lH C()/'YINC Dr nil.' C( ',\IM(lNiC/ITION OR TilE fNr(II~MATION C('NlAINFI) IN nils COMMIJN/('/\'/'1()N IS q'I~ICl'L,{ PHOl1m['r1.~n IF" YOU HAVE RfCEIVLD Tf-tlS COMMUNJC/\TION TN ERROl;:, PLE.llSE IMMDnl~ Tl:1..Y NOTIFY (I:; flY TULPIIONE fiND RLTliNN Tlile; fACSIMIlL TO liS /1 T or! IF /1/l0VF II])/)"E-'S VIII THI·: LIS POST';II. SUNICC. TlI.')NK YOU. II L ~r'h;.;1-1'lA-1fJ(l 1'1\\ ~~nhA·1i~.1)70n 1111 I! Ii!:P M'I:~L'l. :·L,tTL.l1lnl. SEA Tn.k WASJ liNt; J (,I\: '1~H;1 'l~')I) WW\V_f{):;TERCO:\·J SI;./\ 'l-rL1~ 1\','\~;1 !l~(;'rn~ SPOT"':,\ Nr. \\ '~~'III""'I .• II.l:-"; l-'O!(l"LANU llim ,I 1:-'; STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING ) AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Coun of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on March 1, 2008. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $75,60. /»/;--47 2? //;>7uZ'-J 't1nda M. Mills Legal Advenising Representative, Renton Reporter Subscribed and sworn to me this 3rd day of March, 2008. tate of Washington, Residing NOTICE OF APPEAl. HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHI'IGTON An <.Jppca\ Hearing will be held hy the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on March 11,2008 <It 9:00 AM to con.sider the following petition,,: Scahawk."· Headquarters and Practice Facility Pier Appeal LUAOJ·IJ7. SM. EeF Location: 5015 Ripley Lane N. An appeal of the Determination of Non- Significance by the City of Renton Environmental Review Committee regarding the Scahawk" Headquarters and Practice Facilily Pier has been filed. Legal descriptions of the files noted above arc on file in the City Clerk's Office, Seventh Floor, City Hall. Renton. All interes,ted persons are invited to be present at the Pttblic Hearing LO express their opinions. Questions should be directed to the Hearing Examiner at 425-430-6515. Puhlished in the Renton Reporter on March 1,2008. #52752. "'\\\\\\\'1, "........ 0 'I ~' .... -{ Al..s. 1111 .:-"'~''''''''"\''\'''III ~t"'\ II :: '~"'''''''''''''!t\ON~'',,\). ~ -~~~ ~ ~ : ff, .. 0,.".... ~ ~ ~ ~O" "'~-:' ~ gu _. _ g ~ -;. ~ .0 ,CJ :~_ ~<P~ Ua\,:a..':10: ".1 :..A " 7 A.'''..:: " _ ~ ? III" 0-19-\,"" " ::: 1// )-~ 1111\\\\\\, ............... ':\~ .::: II/ OF WAS-(' ........ -I" , ..... ' '1111\\\\\'" CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING March 11, 2008 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: Sea hawks' Headquarters and Practice Facility Pier Appeal PROJECT NUMBER: LUA07-137, SM, ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: An appeal of the Determination of Non-Significance by the City of Renton Environmental Review Committee regarding the Seahawks Headquarters and Practice Facility Pier has been filed. HEX Agenda 3-11-0B.doc Denis Law, Mayor January 10. 2008 Thomas F. Peterson Adam R. Asher Attorneys for Misty Cove Association of Apartment Owners Two Union Square 60 I Union Street, Ste. 4950 Seattle, WA 98101-3951 CIT~ RE: Appeal of Determination of Non-Significance (12-10-07) City of Renton Waterfront Construction, Inc. and Football Northwest, (Seattle Seahawks) LUA 07-137, SM, ECF Dear Mr. Peterson and Asher: JF RENTON Hearing Examiner Fred J. Kaufman This office has received your appeal letter on the above referenced matter. Please be advised that the appeal hearing has been scheduled for Tuesday, March 11, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. The hearing will take place in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. The address is 1055 S Grady Way in Renton. If this office can provide any further assistance, please address those comments in writing. Sincerely, '-T'-c" { /(tL'yn i ,,;tILT- Fred Kaufman Hearing Examiner City of Renton Ene!: Copy of Appeal Letter cc: Ann Nielsen Assistant City Attorney Neil Watts, Development Services Director Stacy Tucker, Development Services All Parti es 0 f Record ----- ---"-1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98057 -(425) 430-6515 ~ RENTOt·t AJIL\n OF T[i~_, cr-?', F ~ ,-' y ,,~-0 CIT OF RENTON 0~~. ~ ;..¢; + "" . + Planning/Building/Public Works Department "j$ -~ Denis Law, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator. ~N~O~----~------------------------------------ January 2, 2008 Alan Foltz, Agent Waterfront Construction, Inc_ 205 NE Northlake Way ste: #230 Seattle, W A 98105 SUBJECT: Seahawks' Headquarters and Practice Facility Pier LUA07-137, SM, ECF Dear ML Foltz: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended December 31, 2007 for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance for the above- referenced project An appeal has been filed on the ERC Determination, therefore, a Hearing Examiner Public Hearing will be scheduled and all parties will be notified. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant are required to be present Enclosed is a copy of the submitted appeal for your reVJew_ If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7382. For the Environmental Review Committee, a7~.d!:-JLgr-- Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner Enclosure cc: . Football NW LLC / Owner(s) Tom Chiado -Vulcan / Applicant Attached / Party(ies) of Record -~---'---1-05-5-S-0-Uth-G:-ra-d-Y-W-a-'-Y---R-en-to-n-,-w-a-sh-in-gt-o-n~9-8-0-57-------~ ®-'ThiS paperoontains 50% ~ material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE Michael Cera 8300 Avalon Drive Mercer Island, WA 98040 tel: (206) 419-0657 eml: mscero@comcast.net (party of record) Joe Burcar Department of Ecology Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program 3190 160th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 tel: (425) 649-7145 (party of record) Steve Jansen 5021 Ripley Lane N ste: #4 Renton, WA 98056 eml: smjansen@msn.com (party of record) Elya George Baches 1414 N 34th Street Renton, WA 98056 (party of record) Steve Gregerson 5021 Ripley Lane N ste: #302 Renton, WA 98056 (party of record) Barbara Paxhia 5021 Ripley Lane N ste: #104 Renton, WA 98056 (party of record) Tom Ehrlichman Soci us Law Group Two Union Square 601 Union Street ste: #4950 Seattle, WA 98101 (party of record) Updated: 01/02/08 Thomas F. Peterson Socius Law Group PLLC Two Union Square 601 Union Street ste: #4950 Seattle, WA 98101 tel: (206) 838-9112 eml: tpeterson@sociuslaw.com (party of record) Brian T. Sabey 5021 Ripley Lane N ste: #304 Renton, WA 98056 eml: bsabey@comcast.net (pa rty of record) Margo Kennamer, President Misty Cove Condo Association 13006 162nd Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059 eml: margok@msn.com (party of record) Aaron Belenky, President Williamsburg Condo HOA 1800 NE 40th Street ste: #H-4 Renton, WA 98056 (party of record) Lance Lopes Qwest Field 800 Occidental Avenue S ste: #100 Seattle, WA 98134 tel: (206) 381-7835 eml: lancel@seahawks.com (party of record) Shelly Munkberg SECO Development 1083 Lake Washington Blvd N ste: #50 Renton, WA 98056 (party of record) Richard Wagner Baylis Architects 10801 Main Street ste: # 110 Bellevue, WA 98004 (party of record) Thelma Sutherland 1205 N 29th Street Renton, WA 98056 (party of record) Jared Salstrom 5021 Ripley Lane N ste: #213 Renton, WA 98056 eml: j a red. sa Istrom@villanova.edu (party of record) Eileen Halverson 16226 Crystal Drive E Enumclaw, WA 98022 (party of record) Roger A. Pearce Foster Pepper PLLC 1111 Third Avenue ste: #3400 Seattle, WA 98101-3299 (party of record) Elaine Wine Vulcan 505 Fifth Avenue S ste: #900 Seattle, WA 98104 tel: (206) 342-2397 eml: elainew@vulcan.com (party of record) Larry Barsher 6940 96th Avenue SE Mercer Island, WA 98040 (party of record) Jeffrey Taraday Foster Pepper 1111 Third Avenue ste: #3400 Seattle, WA 98101 (party of record) (Page 1 of 2) Mike Creegan 1236 S Director Street Seattle, WA 98108 (party of record) Brian Dickson Mag nusson Klemencic Assoc. 1301 Fifth Avenue ste: #3200 Seattle, WA 98101-2699 (party of record) Updated: 01/02/08 Jim Levin Bayley Construction 8005 SE 28th Street PO Box 9004 Mercer Island, WA 98040-9004 tel: (206) 621-8884 eml: jimlevin@bayley.com (party of record) Thomas F Peterson Socius Law Group Two Union Square 601 Union Street ste: #4950 Seattle, WA 98101 tel: (206) 838-9112 eml: tpeterson@sociuslaw.com (party of record) (Page 2 of 2) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF RENTON Clry OF kENYON DEC ~ 1 2007 I-<t=Cf:IVt:D CITY CLERK'S OFfiCE' ~~ MISTY COVE ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS, Appellant, NO. LUA07-137, SM, ECF NOTICE OF APPEAL; v. CITY OF RENTON, WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION, INC., and FOOTBALL NORTHWEST, LLC a.k.a. SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, Respondents. APPEAL OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (12/10/07) I. INTRODUCTION Misty Cove Association of Apartment Owners ("Misty Cove") appeals the City of Renton's December 10,2007 Determination of Non-Significance ("DNS"). This appeal is filed pursuant to the Renton Municipal Code ("RMC"), chapter 4-08-110, the State Environmental Policy Act, RCW 43.21C et. seq., ("SEPA"), and under the procedures set forth on Page 8 of the of the City's Environmental Review Committee's ("ERC") December 1 0, 2007 Report. The City Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to review this appeal of the ERC's DNS. RMC 4-8-070(H)(4). MISTY COVE ASSOCIATION'S soc1 U: ;a: RG~O~P; ~LLC APPEAL OF DNS -1-Two Union Square. 601 Union Street, Suite 4950 J I L ~ ~ Seattle, Washington 98101,3951 ec.<d . L-£«(u \/IJ)J( ~ r\ . Teiephooe 206.838.9100 ~ ~' ~_ &Av ~ Facsimile 206.838.9101 ~\-~i~~~ b~~~~ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 IS 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Misty Cove is an unincorporated condominium association of over 50 residents, l residing on Lake Washington directly adjacent and to the north of the proposed Seahawks Headquarters and Practice Facility Pier. Misty Cove Condominium consists of the condominium building, parking, grounds, and marina located at 5021 Ripley Lane North, Renton, Washington. The Seattle Seahawks propose the construction of a ISO-foot pier at the Seahawks Practice Facility. The location of the pier is located only 265 feet south of Misty Cove's dock and marina. The Application states that the pier will be used to "ferry the public from remote parking locations during summer training camp." (Project Narrative § 9.) The ERC Report notes, "In addition to use for commuting, the pier may be utilized as part of a ferry system, to and from an off-site parking area, during the practice sessions that are open to the public for 3-weeks each summer." (ERC Report at 8.) During peak times, approximately "50 trips per day" could occur. (Id.) This facility will be used to transport upward of2,500 Seahawks fans on a given day. (Lance Lopes 12112/07 Letter at \.) The Seahawks' proposed use will undoubtedly interfere with Misty Cove residents' use and enjoyment of their property and marina. Further, the removal of the existing pier and the construction of a new, longer pier will impact the shorelines and habitat of Lake Washington. While recognizing the environmental impacts of the project, the City'S DNS failed to require mitigation measures. Such mitigation measures and an Environmental Impact Statement ("EIS") are needed to ensure that the shorelines of Lake Washington are adequately protected. Misty Cove files this appeal to the Hearing Examiner for a determination as to whether the proposed use and construction of the pier warrants a more detailed study of the I There are 50 residential units located at Misty Cove, some of which are occupied by multiple residents. MISTY COVE ASSOCIA nON'S APPEAL OF DNS 24837 -2- Socius Law Group, PLLC A T TOR N E Y S Two Union Square. 601 Union Street. Suite 4950 Seattle, Washington 98101.3951 Telephone 206.838.9100 Facsimile 206.838.9101 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 impact to the shoreline by way of an EIS and necessitates that mitigation measures be required as a pre-condition to the issuance of a permit. II. SUBSTANTIAL ERRORS IN FACT OR LAW As required under the City's appeal procedures, Misty Cove offers the following list of substantial errors in fact or law which exist in the record of the proceedings. RMC 4-8- II 0(C)(3). A. List of Errors • The City failed to require mitigation measures for impacts to the environment. • The City failed to consider the impact to adjacent shorelines as required by RMC 4-3-090(K)(3). • The Seahawks Pier is not an "allowable" pier under RMC 4-3-090(L)(l2)(d). • A Transportation Crossing requires a determination that the proposed route has the least impact on the environment, while meeting City Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element requirements. RMC 4-3-050(L)(8)(a)(i)(a). • The City's DNS does not include the requisite findings required by RMC 4-3- 090(L)(l2)(c)(iv) for a new pier. B. Failure to Require Mitigation Measures The City's DNS does not contain specific SEPA mitigation measures necessary to demonstrate consistency with the City's adopted standards and policies for commercial uses within the shorelines. The Applicant did not meet its burden of demonstrating consistency "with the criteria which must be met before a [shoreline] permit is granted." RMC 4-9- 190(F)( 4). Neither the shoreline permit nor other permits may be granted under City code, absent a showing of consistency with the City's adopted shoreline program and regulations. RMC 4-9-I 90(E). If the proposal is inconsistent with the City's adopted SEPA policies governing the use of shorelines and mitigation of impacts, it follows that the proposal does MISTY COVE ASSOCIATION'S APPEAL OF DNS 24837 -3- Socius Law Group, PLLC ATTORNEYS Two Union Square. 601 Union Street, Suite 4950 SeatUe, Washington 98101.3951 Telephone 206.838,9100 Facsimile 206.838.9101 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I I 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 not adequately mitigate project impacts to the extent required by SEPA and the City's environmental regulations. The criteria for issuance of a shoreline permit are relevant to the Examiner's review of the ERC's decision. The City's shoreline policies and regulations serve as the basis for substantive conditioning of the project to ensure adequate SEP A mitigation, because they are adopted SEPA policies. RMC 4-9-070(O)(2)(c). Under City code, specific SEPA mitigation measures become conditions of the underlying permit approval decision, once issued. RMC 4-9-070(L)(l3). Given the interrelationship between shoreline permit conditions and SEPA conditions, the ERC needed to determine whether the project was consistent with the City's adopted SEP A policy for shorelines, as a pre-requisite to completion of the City's SEP A review. City code requires that any mitigation conditions addressing the requirements of the City's shoreline regulations be specific, in order to qualify as SEP A mitigation measures. RMC 4-9-070(L )(9). In the absence of specific mitigation measures addressing compliance with shoreline regulations, the DNS must be overturned and remanded for further study. The City identified environmental impacts to the earth, water quality, fish and wildlife, and environmental health hazards, such as noise. (ERC Report at 4-8). While identifying the impacts caused by the proposed pier, the City failed to require any mitigation measures for the known impacts. The ERC Reports simply states, "No mitigation is proposed," for each of the identified environmental impacts. (Id.) The City documented that there would be an impact to the earth due to increased wave action on the shoreline where it is devoid of stabilization vegetation. (ERC Report at 4.) "This may occur where the existing dock would be removed and continue until new vegetation becomes established." (Id.) The City did not specify how long it would take for MISTY COVE ASSOCIATION'S APPEAL OF DNS 24837 -4- Socius Law Group, PLLC ATTORNEYS Two Union Square. 601 Union Street, Suite 4950 Seattle, WaShington 98101.3951 Telephone 206.838.9100 Facsimile 206.838.9101 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 the establishment of new vegetation, nor did it require the Seahawks to take any temporary mitigation measures. (Id.) With respect to water quality, the City noted that there would be "minor, temporary impacts to water quality" during the construction and removal of the six existing wood piles and installation of the 18 new steel piles. (ERC Report at 4.) Despite recognizing this impact, the City similarly did not require any mitigation measures. (ld.) As to fish and wildlife, one of Washington's most sacred treasures, the City noted that juvenile salmonides migrate along the shoreline. (ERC Report at 6.) These fish will be directly impacted by the construction of the Seahawks' pier. One of the City code's expressly stated purposes is to "protect aquatic habitat for salmonid species." RMC 4-3- 050(A)(6). The City also indicated the presence of wildlife near the site, such as beavers, pond sliders, red-winged blackbirds, snipe, amphibians, and ducks. (Id.l Despite recognizing these impacts, the City again declined to require any mitigation measures. (Id) With respect to environmental health, the City indicated that noise would increase: "Following construction, the increased use of the pier would result in more noise than previously. This noise would be mitigated somewhat by the relocation of the pier south from the nearest residential units, Misty Cove." (ERC Report at 6.) The City recognized that the location of the new dock would not fully mitigate the increased noise. The City again declined to require any mitigation measures. (Id.) Because the City failed to require specific mitigation measures addressing compliance with shoreline regulations, the DNS must be overturned and remanded for further study. Moreover, the City failed to meaningfully consider the impact of increased boat and human traffic over and along the shoreline. The Seahawks admit that they plan upwards of 50 ferry trips per day to transport as many as 2,500 fans to and from the Seahawks Practice Facility. The pier will be located at the terminus of the public access route. That route runs MISTY COVE ASSOCIATION'S APPEAL OF DNS 24837 -5- Socius Law Group, PLLC A T TOR N E Y 5 Two Union Square. 601 Union Street, Suite 4950 Seattle, Washington 98101.3951 Telephone 206.838.9100 Facsimile 206.838.9101 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 along the shoreline adjacent to Misty Cove's south boundary line and begins at the intersection of the entrance to Misty Cove. This will unquestionably cause substantial noise and litter, and could subject Misty Cove to vandalism and trespass. More importantly, the increased boat traffic (up to 50 ferry trips per day) and the increased human traffic (up to 2,500 fans per day) over and along the shoreline will undoubtedly disrupt the shoreline and its habitat. For example, the City recognized that the earth will be impacted by wave action due to the lack of vegetation on the site. Yet, the City utterly failed to consider that this wave action will be substantially increased by the use oftlle pier as a ferry system. The City also recognized that juvenile salmonide migrate along the shoreline, but similarly failed to consider how such salmonide, and other wildlife, will be affected by the substantial increase in boat and human traffic. A more detailed study, such as an EIS, is needed to ensure that the shoreline and its habitat are protected from the increased boat and human traffic proposed by the Seahawks. At the very least, the City should have required mitigation measures to protect Misty Cove and the shoreline from the substantial impact that will be caused by the daily influx of thousands of Seahawks fans. Such mitigation measures could include requirements that all foot traffic be routed to the south of Misty Cove's property; that the Seahawks provide security during the times that it is ferrying passengers to the Seahawks Practice Facility; and that the number of daily trips and passengers are limited in order to ease the burden on the shoreline and its habitat. Because the City failed to consider any such mitigation measures, the DNS must be overturned and remanded for further study. c. Failure to Consider Impact to Adjacent Shorelines The City did not adequately consider the impact of the Seahawks' pier to adjacent landowners, such as Misty Cove. RMC 4-3-90(K)(3), entitled "Use Compatibility and Aesthetic Effects," provides: MISTY COVE ASSOCIATION'S APPEAL OF DNS 24837 -6- Socius Law Group, PLLC ATTORNEYS Two Union Square. 601 Union Street, Suite 4950 Seattle, Washington 98101.3951 Telephone 206.838.9100 Facsimife 206.838.9101 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 1 12 13 14 15 16 a, The potential impact of any of the following on adjacent, nearby, and possibly distant land and shoreline users shall be considered in the design plans and efforts made to avoid or minimize detrimental aspects: 1. 11. Ill. IV. v. View Obstruction: Buildings, smokestacks, machinery, fences, piers, poles, wires, signs, lights, and other structures. Community Disturbances: Noise, odors, night lighting, water and land traffic, and other structures and activities, Design Theme: Architectural styles, exterior designs, landscaping patterns and other aspects of the overall design of a site shall be a uniform or coordinated design, planned for the purpose of visual enhancement as well as for serving a useful purpose, Visually Unpleasant Areas: Landscaped screening shall be used to hide from public view any area that may impinge upon thc visual quality of a site, for example, disposal bins, storage yards, and outdoor work areas. Outdoor Activities: ... Outdoor activities of commercial and industrial operations shall be limited to those necessary for the operation of the enterprise, Outdoor areas shall not be used for storage of more than minimal amounts of equipment, parts, materials, products, or other objects. 17 Misty Cove's December 3,2007 comment letter set forth in detail its concerns. Such 18 concerns include visual obstructions, community disturbances, and visually unpleasant areas. 19 One concern is the increased disturbance of Misty Cove residents' use and enjoyment of their 20 property and dock. The ferry transport of nearly 2,500 Seahawks fans a day would greatly 21 increase noise and disturbance. Further, with a length of 150 feet, the proposed pier will 22 interfere with boaters' use of the Misty Cove marina. Boaters will be forced to navigate 23 around the pier to cruise the shoreline or gain access to the marina. A second concern is the 24 existing unsightly boathouse. Removal of the existing dock will render the existing 25 boathouse useless. The Seahawks admit that the boathouse is unsightly. (Lopes 12112/07 26 MISTY COVE ASSOCIA nON'S APPEAL OF DNS 24837 -7- Socius Law Group, PLLC ATTO.RNEYS Two Union Square. 601 Union Street, Suite 4950 Seattle, Washington 98101.3951 Telephone 206.838_9100 Facsimile 206.838.9101 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Letter at 2.) Pursuant to the considerations in RMC 4-3-90(K)(3)( iii) and (iv), the Seahawks are required to avoid unsightly, useless structures. To comply with these considerations, the Seahawks should be required to remove the existing boathouse. D. The Seahawks' Pier is not an "Allowable" Pier Under RMC 4-3-090 (L)(12)(d). RMC 4-3-090(L)(l2) regulates Piers and Docks. Subsection (d), entitled "Allowable Types of Piers and Docks," provides: Permits for the following construction or piers or docks will be allowed: i. Ii. 11i. IV. v. Vi. Piers and docks which provide for public recreational access and use or mannas. Community piers and docks in new major waterfront subdivisions. Piers and docks which are constructed for private joint use by two (2) or more waterfront property owners. Private single family residence piers and docks. Community piers and docks for multi-family residence including apartments, condominiums, or similar developments. Water-dependent commercial and industrial uses. The Seahawks' proposed pier does not fall within any of the "allowable" categories. The only conceivable category the pier falls within is the commercial and industrial use category. However, the Seahawks' organization is not a "water-dependent" commercial enterprise, within the meaning of the RMC. Therefore, the Seahawks' proposed pier is not permitted under RMC 4-3-090(L)(12). E. The City'S DNR Contains No Finding that the Proposed Route of the Seahawks' Ferry has the Least Impact on the Environment. RMC 4-3-050(L)(8)(a)(i)(a), entitled "Transportation Crossings," provides that construction of "vehicular or non-vehicular transportation crossings" may be permitted only MISTY COVE ASSOCIATION'S APPEAL OF DNS -8- Socius Law Group, PLLC ATTORNEYS Two Union Square. 601 Union Street, Suite 4950 Seattle, Washington 98101.3951 Telephone 206.838,9100 Facsimile 206.838.9101 1 2 3 4 5 6 upon the finding of certain criteria, which include a "determination" that the "proposed route" has the "least impact on the environment." The City's DNS does not include such a determination. Absent such a determination, the Seahawks' proposed use of the pier is not permitted by the RMC. F. The City's DNS does not Include the Requisite Findings Under RMC 4-3- 90(L)(l2)(c)(iv) for a New Pier. 7 Pursuant to RMC 4-3-090(L)(l2)(c)(iv), the approval ofa new dock or pier "shall 8 include a finding that each of the following criteria have been met": (1) The dock or pier 9 length does not extend beyond a length necessary to provide reasonable and safe moorage; 10 (2) The dock or pier does not interfere with the publie use and enjoyment of the water nor 11 create a hazard to navigation; and (3) The dock or pier will not result in the urueasonable 12 interference with the use of adjacent docks and/or piers. The City's DNR does not contain 13 these requisite findings. 14 III. STANDING 15 As required for SEPA appeals and under RMC 4-8-11 0(E)(3), Misty Cove 16 incorporates the above and alleges the following facts demonstrating that its interests are 17 among those that are required to be considered, the decision prejudices those interests, the 18 prejudice will result in injury in fact, and a decision in favor of Misty Cove would 19 substantially eliminate or redress the prejudice. 20 The interests of Misty Cove residents are within the zone of interests the City must 21 consider, as specified in City code and SEPA. The City's shoreline regulations expressly 22 require consideration of view and aesthetic impacts on adjacent residents. RMC 4-3- 23 090(K)(3). Similarly, the SEPA Checklist required for the project included discussion of 24 impacts to traffic, fish and wildlife habitat, aesthetics, and noise, all environmental factors to 25 26 MISTY COVE ASSOCIATION'S APPEAL OF DNS 24837 -9- Socius Law Group, PLLC ATTORNEYS Two Union Square. 601 Union Street, Suite 4950 Seattle, WaShington 98101.3951 Telephone 206.838.9100 Facsimile 206.838.9101 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 be considered by the City during its SEP A review. The City" s critical areas and shoreline regulations also require protection of the natural resource along the shoreline. Misty Cove will be injured by the proposed use and construction of the pier. With 50 residential units on four floors and a marina, Misty Cove residents have real property interests in their use and enjoyment of the Misty Cove property and Lake Washington. The residents of Misty Cove have chosen to live there because they use and enjoy Lake Washington and the shoreline adjacent to it. All of the units of Misty Cove have balconies and patios. The lake and the shorelands can be viewed from almost every unit. Misty Cove residents frequently walk on the shorelands, view the water and shorelands, fish, boat. engage in watersports, watch wildlife, and generally enjoy all of the sights and activities available on Lake Washington and the adjacent shorelands Misty Cove's dock and marina are several hundred feet north of the Seahawk's proposed pier. The proposed use and construction of the pier will interfere with Misty Cove residents' use and enjoyment of their property. The proposed use of the pier as a ferry system for as many as 2,500 Seahawks' fans per day will unquestionably increase boat and pedestrian traffic on the shoreline. This increased traffic will cause an increase in noise and will disrupt the ordinarily pleasant view of Lake Washington. The increased traffic may also result in trespass, litter, and vandalism on the Misty Cove property. The length of the proposed pier, 150 feet, will interfere with boaters' use of the Misty Cove marina. Boaters will be forced to navigate around the pier to cruise the shoreline or gain access to the marina. Further, the construction of the dock will create substantial noise. The construction will also impact the shorelines of Misty Cove's property and the adjacent shoreline by increased wave action, decreased water quality, and disruption to fish and wildlife. Misty Cove is prejudiced by the City's decision to issue a DNS that fails to adequately mitigate these impacts. MISTY COVE ASSOCIATION'S APPEAL OF DNS 24837 -10- Socius Law Group, PLLC A T TOR N E Y S Two Union Square. 601 Union Street, Suite 4950 Seattle, Washington 98101.3951 Telephone 206.838.9100 Facsimile 206.838.9101 I. , -' ' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IV. RELIEF SOUGHT Misty Cove seeks an order remanding or revising the above-captioned DNS. Remanding the DNS to the ERC for additional study or revising the DNS to include necessary mitigation measures or requiring an EIS, would substantially eliminate or redress above-described injuries to the interests of Misty Cove members and would ensure environmental protection of the shoreline and its habitat. DATED this 31 st day of December, 2007. MISTY COVE ASSOCIATION'S APPEAL OF DNS 24837 SOCIUS LAW GROUP, PLLC homas F. Peterson, WSBA #16587 Adam R. Asher, WSBA #35517 Attorneys for Misty Cove Association of Apartment Owners -11- Socius Law Group, PLLC A T TOR N E Y S Two Union Square. 601 Union Street, Suite 4950 Seattle, Washington 98101.3951 Telephone 206.838.9100 Facsimile 206.838.9101 " j," CITY OF RENTON City Clerk Division o Cash 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W A 98057 425-430-6510 :gJ Check No. 5r-1...f'Y r (\ Description: !\ ¥(vc0J - Funds Received From: o Copy Fee ~Appeal Fee Name \-~ ~d.-dn Add .., \\ <:...-I=f;L/ .. ( "C I ress J (..o?/ " 'c-v, <7/) -.S 1-'c, . City/Zip c:~ ~ ~ 1; 'v\J.'-. .: Receipt lOOO I ) "Z,}lo' Date -L_ =-<...--_--=-___ -<--/_ o Notary Service 0 _______________ __ City lJiajf Signature U \1)/\ , t '- , '\ City of henton Department of Planning / Building / Pub/J" vVorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~ LA: , COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 3, 2007 ~ APPLICATION NO: LUA07-137, SM, ECF. SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 19, 2007 APPLICANT: Alan Foltz PROJECT MANAGER' PROJECT TITLE: Sea hawks Practice Facility Pier PLANREV~ SITE AREA: NIA ..... BUILDING AREA 1Qross): NIA \n~ I LOCATION: 5015 Riple Lane N I WORK ORDER NO: 77844 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested an Environmental Determination, Administrative" Plan Review and Approval, and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for construction of a new pier (dock) to be located an lake-Washington. The pier would be associated with the Seahawks Headquarters and Training Facility. The west end of the pier would be 15Q feet from the edge of Lake Washington. The pier would be 5 feet 10-112 inch wide, except for the east 30 feet of the pier, which woul!! be 3 feet 10- 112 inches wide. The pier would replace an existing 6-foot wide, 123-foot long dock that would be removed. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor "'ajor Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans ortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy! Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport EnvifOll!}1M'lf -1Q,QOOFiMt ~"":OM Feel B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed properly assess this proposal, Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date CITY OF RENTON ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 1055 S. GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98055 Phone: (425) 430-6918 Fax: (425) 430-6855 PAY Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents PAY lOTHE ORDER OF LAKEFRONT JOINT VENTURE LLC C/O FOOTBALL NW LLC 505 5TH AVE -#900 SEATTLE, WA 98104 l.-U4Ql -131- U.S. BANK OF WASHINGTON VOID AFTER 6 MONTHS . , i MAYOR FINANCE & IS ADMINISTRATOR 11'021; 71,['1311' I: I. 25000 W 51: I. 5 :l5oob"lB:l j,BII' PLEASE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING CITY OF RENTON, WA 98055 Refund 12/21/2007 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK Refund -site plan review fee not N0.267493 0.00 500,00 Check Reqw for Non Vendor Refund or ~ imbursement Thisfarm is used on~Yj'. one time vendors. Please contact ACCL .1ts Payahle if you have any questions regarding one time vendors. Check will be included in the J/ext scheduled AlP check run al/d mailed or released after Coul/cil approval. Check Request Info: v J Mail address for check: c(o FOof1oa)/ f./w /..-L-C 5D5 S"fh-~ if Q06 q Date of request: 12-/(7/07 Requestor's department/division: p/e/pw LL-C Check amount: Account I/umber(s) to charge: $ (fOO.CQ Oct;, 31f'7. '6/.00. OO!"!- Requestor's ext. #: /;2.,q'f Amount per account #: ck '51)0. 00 Reason for refund or reimbursement: S (k r /~ {leA; I~ lee no{ i"e1 Ul rea -fir -1vz,.,5 jOvop p;r-:JetJn Jif f./er1n ~. I ~~;;! ~:ndl~;,e;:.:t. L , rnNV.><V I VI Vf r ..... <--JU f-.au~ Jdy f11~ [r:J *A roval Si nature: Requestor's Department Administrator, Divisiol/ Director or designee: Signature: ........:~~~g~~~!-I~0--------J Date: *The person approving this check request must be an authorized signer. Q:IDAT A_Cc;nter'lfonnslFinance\2007 J'heck Requc:;t for Non Vendor Refund or Reimbursement (prim and fill in) doc Pr;"i and Fill 11/ FOI7II, July 2007 To: TINA HEMPHILL FIS DEPT. INTERFUND TRANSFER FORM DATE:,!;!//! len FROM:.J-..tw;ree.n f--f/cofavJ -fi;y ,TCt11".fcr f-knI1 {~ Please prepare the following cash transfer: WA01-137- DEBIT: 'W/O Function Account Number Amount Description .. -,----.,--,-,----~-----.. __ .- --.,.,.-.. ,---,-,'-----,.----~----. -- CREDIT: \\,10 Function Account Number Amount Description ....... ~~.-~----~~.,-. ....... ...... ·~·-·····-{r-------·---~·~·--~~····~~-····-··;;; z.;,~.~-~., .~._l'~~ .. .. . . . ~ ____ i ___ ~~.~_i{lt?Q.·3t.f5 .'lJ.,~a_,.t!21'R_~~~_.L.~m.f2O' ... .:::y$¥·r;Mrc.-c-t--=-I~ -~==t~=:.:·· •• :.-:j:.JiiV-,-~~~ ... "[(} TfL=::=:I==::.~-=·::::.::::: , , .. ---'-.--'--.-r--.--.-----j---.-_ .. -_.-'----.------.------.-.------------_.-,.----.------.----- __ " __ , __ ,_.f _____ ~.J ____ . __ .. ,. ___ . __ ,_. _________ , _______ ~ __ + .. ____ ~ __ ... _ .. ~ .. _ , ---~------_._-----"'-'"--,---_ .. _-- , ---_._,.-_._-_._, .. _-" ... _ .. -- I Approval Signature: ¥rWVl ~. ¥1?\!yIiJ, Date: iz}nlJDcrz Noie: Documentation to support lhis trallsfer reques/illust be attached. Document in Windows Internet Explorer\ ReVised ~/2UU5 sg Printed: 12-17-2007 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 .. _ .. __ .. _.---------- Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA07-137 12/17/200701:10 PM Receipt Number: R0706691 Total Payment: -500.00 Payee: MANAGER REQUESTED REFUND OF SA FEE Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval Payments made for this receipt Amount 500.00 -1,000.00 Trans Method Description Amount Payment RD Pmts REFUND Re-Dist Account Balances Trans Account Code Description 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax -500.00 .00 Balance Due .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 From: To: Date: Subject: Jennifer Henning Higgins, Elizabeth 12111120073:01:34 PM Re: Sea hawks Pier refund The refund would be $500. They would still pay $1,000 for the Shoreline Permit, and $500 for SEPA for lands covered by water. Laureen can take care of the refund on this when she returns on Thursday. >>> Elizabeth Higgins 121111072:28 PM »> The applicant for the Seahawks pier paid $1000 for the SPR, $500 for the ERG, and $500 for the Shoreline permit ap. How much do we refund and who initiates this process? Thanks cc: Nicolay, Laureen ... SEATTLE SEAHAWKS LANCE LOPES General Counsell Vice President Business Development December 12,2007 Ms. Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner Development Services Renton City Hall, Sixth Floor 1055 South Grady Way Re::ton, WA 98057 Re: Seahawks Pier Objections Dear Ms. Higgins: The Seattle Seahawks are in receipt of a copy of a letter from the attorney representing Misty Cove Association of Apartment Owners ("Misty Cove") to you regarding our proposed dock at the Renton practice facility. The primary purpose of this letter is to clarify the inaccurate assumptions in Misty Cove's letter. The dock. is not a transportation facility. From the beginning of this project, we committed to Misty Cove that we would mitigate surface street traffic congestion during training camp. One of the primary intentions of our waterfront plan is to mitigate traffic impacts on Misty Cove. In addition to neighborhood parking plans, and shuttle buses, we are considering the viability of transporting some fans via our water access. The dock would be used for fan access for a three week period in August each year during training camp. For the remaining 49 weeks of the year, the dock would not be used for fan access. If the water access plan is financially viable, the Seahawks would have a tour boat or other operator, with boat capacity of un estimuted 100 to 200 passengers, bring fans to the dock to offload. The estimated number of round trips would be 4 to 6 per day. The estimate of 50 total (one-way) trips in the application materials is a very conservative estimate, and would not apply to the boats carrying fans. We estimate maximum capacity at our facility to be approximately 2,500 fans. The Seahawks expect we would only reach that maximum capacity a few times each training camp period, perhaps during weekends. Many days, attendance could be in the 500 to 800 person range. On those days, the fan tour boat may not even operate or wonld be on a reduced trip mode. When the fan boat did operate, the operations would be concentrated to the times the team is practicing. These periods are estimated to be between 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. and between 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. 800 Occidental Avenue S., Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98134 206-381-7835 www.seanawks.com The most likely route for fan access would be from the south, loading at South Port. This would require the boat to travel along largely uninhabited shoreline to the facility, and not in front of Misty Cove. We do not anticipate much ifany impact on Misty Cove's use or enjoyment of their own dock. In fact, we are proposing relocating the proposed dock substantially further south and away from our present dock location and Misty Cove. There will not be alcohol served to the general public at the site. To the extent the fans queue up to get back on the boat when practice ends, they will be queued in the public access area on the shoreline more than 150 feet from the Misty Cove location. We anticipate the attendees will be primarily families. Despite all of our dialogue with Misty Cove residents, they continue to worry that our fans will be "loud", "unruly", "celebratory", "disruptive", "vandals" and "trespassers". Our experience with NFL training camps in Cheney, Washington, and elsewhere in the NFL has shown that training camp fans do not act in the ways that Misty Cove fears. The training camp atmosphere is very unlike game days at Qwest Field or other NFL venues around the country. The fans at training camp events are generally very polite and low key, and are certainly not vandals or trespassers. The Seahawks would also have security personnel on hand, so that any unruly behavior would be controlled. The dock length is appropriate for its intended use and the shallow depths of the Lake Washington shoreline near the project. The reason the Seahawks have proposed a 150 foot dock is because the water depth in front of the Seahawks property is considerably shallower than the surrounding areas. Therefore, it is necessary for the Seahawks to build the dock to 150 feet to provide the requisite depth needed for small boat accessibility. We do not intend to moor tour boats at the dock other than potentially for brief periods outlined above. The Seahawks also have no plans to moor large private boats at the dock. With respect to the existing boat house, the Seahawks agree that the boathouse is unsightly. The Seahawks have no intention, however, of removing the structure. We plan to replace the existing exterior with new siding to improve the look of the boat house. [ hope this information is helpful in clarifying the Seahawks actual intentions. Please let me know if you have any questions. ~elY, ~~ C: Tom Peterson, Misty Cove SEATTLE SEAHAWKS STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King County, Washington, The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County, The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on December 15, 2007, The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $113.40. , dif:xk1 #;l#/d,.f, "'''''\\'111 l'::1nda M, Mills .;::.",,, y."A Tit "'I Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter 2" ,,,,,'',,,,,,, )--<) "" , , -«"., ",.Ia~ I" ... I Subscnbed and sworn to me thiS 20th day of Decembq; 6P9', ... o 101:',,, '(' '-;,/ Kathy Dal~, lIIotary Public for. in Covington, Washington P, 0, Number: := ~; tlO~ eM· c.fJ ~ :::: ~ 3 ... ~,,~ fl· -: ./ -t =:: ->""a • -<!::: C-.:: ~ rn ~ 0 Go-... ~E'-~ 0 ~'I ~?~I.IC ~3 e State of Washington, "Re~Sl1l! ,"----.-1:1 "'11,\\\'.",'''' 1 :)', ,~ NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. Seahawks' Headquarters and Practice Facility Pier LUA07-137. SM, ECF Location: 5015 Ripley Lane N. The applicant has proposed construction of a new pier to replace an existing pier. The existing wooden, float pier is 123 feet long by 6 feet wide, held in position by 12-inch wood piling. The existing pier would be completely removed. The new pier would be located appmximatley 210 feel south of the existing pier location. The new pier would be 150 feet long and between 3 feet 10.5 inches and 5 feet 10.5 inches wide. The full opt!n grate deck would ht! supportt!d by 18 steel pilings of 6-inches in diameter. The deck surface would be a minimum 2 feet 6 inehe~ above the Ordinary High Water. The project requires a Shoreline Subslantial Development Pennit from [he City of Renton. Appeals of the environmental detennination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 31. 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required S75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.8. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Published in the Renton Reporter on Decemher 15, 2007. #29667 "-.. ~- ...... i-'. '1 ~ t"'';;;' NOllC1E ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (ONS) POSTED TO r'W rl~Y INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Soahawks' Headquarters and Practice Facility Pie, PROJECT NUMBER: LUA07-137. SM, Eer LOCATION; 5015 Ripley Lane N DESCRIPTION', The applicant has proposed construct',on of a new pier 10 replace an existmg pie •. The "";611119 wooden, Iloat pier IS 123 fect long by 6 feet wide, held in position by 12-inch wood piling. The existing pier would be completl'ly removed. The new pier would be locat&d appr<>ximatley 210 feet ""uth of the eXlsling pier location. Tho MW pier would be 150 feet long and between 3 'eot 10.5 inches and 5 feet 10.5 Inches wide. The full open grate dCCk would be supported by 18 st,.el pilings "I 6·onches in !liamete •. The deck surface would bit II minimum 2 lccl 6 Inches above the Ordinary High Water, The project requires a Shoreline SUbstantial Development Permit from the City of Ranton, THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEVV COMMITTEE (ERG) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT Appnls of the environmental determination must bc filed in writing on or bororo S,OO PM on December 31, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing togetiler with the re-quired $75.00 appli~ation lee With: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 96057. ApP'lals to the Examln~r are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Se~tion 4·8·110,9. Additional inrormation regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerlt's Office,14251430.S510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED FOR FURTHER INFORMA.TION PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430·7200 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION I, V",l-,-,' ... k. 14..:il",,'''' , hereby certify that :s copies of the above document were posted by me in --3-conspicuous places or nearby the described nr'\np.rtvQa,\\\,III\ DATE: \'2.-15 ~ 0-=1- '-- A TrEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public. in and for the State of Washington re!;U!ln • ~-,,,,o,,,,,,....,.f;;;I;;:;tp=,,-,,<-_., on the • " 1) I L{ day ofoe. cu....w-~ ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Seahawks' Headquarters and Practice Facility Pier PROJECT NUMBER: LUA07-137, SM, ECF LOCATION: 5015 Ripley Lane N DESCRIPTION: The applicant has proposed construction of a new pier to replace an existing pier. The existing wooden, float pier is 123 feet long by 6 feet wide, held in position by 12-inch wood piling. The existing pier would be completely removed. The new pier would be located approximatley 210 feet south of the existing pier location. The new pier would be 150 feet long and between 3 feet 10.5 inches and 5 feet 10.5 inches wide. The full open grate deck would be supported by 18 steel pilings of 6-inches in diameter. The deck surface would be a minimum 2 feet 6 inches above the Ordinary High Water. The project requires a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit from the City of Renton. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 31, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CITY 'F RENTON Kathy Keolker, Mayor Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator December 12, 2007 Alan Foltz, Agent Waterfront Construction, Inc. 205 NE Northlake Way #230 Seattle, W A 98105 SUBJECT: Seahawks' Headquarters and Practice Facility Pier LUA07-137, SM, ECF Dear Mr. Foltz: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on December 10, 2007, decided that your project will be issned a Determination of Non-Significance. The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)( c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6- 6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other infonnation, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 31, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, W A 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430c7382. For the Environmental Review Committee, EM7~4Z.-J~r~ Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner cc: Football NW LLC / Owner Parties of Record ------------1-O-55-S~O-uili--G-rn-d~y~W-a-Y--R-e-n-w-n,-w-M-· -hi-n~-o-n-9-8-0-57-------------·~ * This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE December 12, 2007 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determination CITY .F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on December 10,2007: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE PROJECT NAME: Seahawks' Headquarters and Practice Facility Pier PROJECT NUMBER: LUA07-I37, SM, ECF LOCATION: 5015 Ripley Lane N DESCRIPTION: The applicant has proposed construction of a new pier to replace an existing pier. The existing wooden, Iloat pier is 123 feet long by 6 feet wide, held in position by 12- inch wood piling. The existing pier would be completely removed. The new pier would be located approximatley 210 feet south of the existing pier location. The new pier would be 150 feet long and between 3 feet 10.5 inches and 5 feet 10.5 inches wide. The full open grate deck would be supported by 18 steel pilings of 6-inches in diameter. The deck surface would be a minimum 2 feet 6 inches above the Ordinary High Water. The project requires a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit from tile City of Renton Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 31, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-IIO.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7382. For the Environmental Review Committee, Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner Enclosure cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW, Stewart Reinbold David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT. Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe ~ ------j-O-55-S-o-uth-G-ra-d-y-W-.-y--R-e-n-to-n,-w-as-. -hin-g-to~n~98-0-57-----~ R EN TON * This paper contains 50% recyCled material. 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA07-137, SM, ECF, SA-A APPLICANT: Alan Foltz, Waterfrton Construction, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Sea hawks' Headquarters and Practice Facility Pier DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed construction of a new pier to replace an existing pier. The existing wooden, float pier is 123 feet long by 6 feet wide, held in position by 12-inch wood piling. The existing pier would be completely removed. The new pier would be located approximatley 210 feet south of the existing pier location. The new pier would be 150 feet long and between 3 feet 10.5 inches and 5 feet 10.5 inches wide. The full open grate deck would be supported by 18 steel pilings of 6-inches in diameter. The deck surface would be a minimum 2 feet 6 inches above the Ordinary High Water. The project requires a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit from the City of Renton LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 5015 Ripley Lane N The City of Henton . Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT: The (ollowing notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only;tltey are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. aodeight .o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours. between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. Water: 1. If water service is to be provided to the pier, an appropriate back flow device will be required. Sanitary Sewer: 1. There are no City of Renton sanitary sewer mains existing in the location of the proposed dock. Applicant needs to verify if there. is to be any plumbing out to the dock. 2. The applicant needs to coordinate with the King County Wastewater Division for locates prior to and during construction around the Mercer Island Force Main. General: 1. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. All civil engineering plans shall be tied into a minimum of two of the City of Renton current Horizontal and Vertical Control network. 3. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards-. ERq-Advisory ~otes Page 1 of 1 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA07-137, SM, ECF, SA-A APPLICANT: Alan Foltz, Waterfrton Construction, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Seahawks' Headquarters and Practice Facility Pier DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed construction of a new pier to replace an existing pier. The existing wooden, float pier is 123 feet long by 6 feet wide, held in position by 12-inch wood piling. The existing pier would be completely removed. The new pier would be located approximaUey 210 feet south of the existing pier location. The new pier would be 150 feet long and between 3 feet 10.5 inches and 5 feet 10.5 inches wide. The full open grate deck would be supported by 18 steel pilings of 6-inches in diameter. The deck surface would be a minimum 2 feet 6 inches above the Ordinary High Water. The project requires /)" ~ tU P i'mipdr~tj>'1' .ils Pis" i>la , is ~~9 a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit from the City of Renton. fJ"" . lMJ ~ LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 5015 Ripley Lane N LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 31,2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION SIGNATURES Community Services December 15, 2007 December 10, 2007 ;Z//(J/C 7 Date' , IJ...)I c/n Date I. David Daniels, Fire Chief Fire Department Date I ,,,(col"" Date ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE December 10, 2007 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator I. David Daniels, Fire Chief Alex Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning Meeting Date: Monday, December 10,2007 Time: 3:00 PM Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Agenda listed below. Allen Kim Townhomes (Petzel) LUA07-133, SA-A, ECF Application for Environmental Review and Administrative Site Plan Review for a 6-unit town home development in the RM·T zone. This project is in the Downtown Urban Design District Overlay B. The underlying parcel is 9,572 square feet. The project consists of two 6,262 square foot buildings of three units each; density would be 27 dwelling unitslnet acre. Each building would consist of three stories with parking spots (2 per unit) on the first floor. Two additional surface parking spots would be provided in the rear of the bUilding. Vehicular access would be through the alley and an internal shared driveway; pedestrian access would be in the front, off Shattuck Ave. S. The applicant has requested a parking modification to reduce the size of the parking stalls. Seahawks' Headquarters and Practice Facility Pier (Higgins) LUA07-137, SM, ECF, SA-A The applicant has proposed construction of a new pier to replace an existing pier. The existing wooden, float pier is 123 feet long by 6 feet wide, held in position by 12-inch wood piling. The existing pier would be completely removed. The new pier would be located approximatley 210 feet south of the existing pier location. The new pier would be 150 feet long and between 3 feet 10.5 inches and 5 feet 10.5 inches wide. The full open grate deck would be supported by 18 steel pilings of 6-inches in diameter. The deck surface would be a minimum 2 feet 6 inches above the Ordinary High Water. The project requires Administrative Site Plan Review and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit from the City of Renton. Keeping of Animals Docket #6-10 fMathas) LUA07-138, ECF Current City code allows the keeping of a maximum of three household pets regardless of lot size. The proposal amends the number of allowable household pets on lots larger than 20,000 square feet, one additional household pet per additional 10.000 square feet in additional lot size is allowed. The definition of household pets is also proposed to be amended. The current standards for the keeping of domestic animals require a one-acre lot size minimum regardless of the type of animal. Proposed changes would allow animals to be kept on smaller lots and the definitions of domestic animals would be amended, so that they are defined by the minimum lot size needed to keep the animals rather than by the size of the animal. • Proposed changes would combine the existing general requirements for the keeping of animals with the requirements for Hobby Kennels. • Also, the proposed changes change the name of "Hobby Kennel License" to "Additional Animals Permit". cc: K. Keolker, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer S. Dale Estey, Economic Development Director ® D. Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshal N. Watts, P/B/PW Development Services Director ® F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner B. Van Horne, Deputy Fire Chief ® J. Medzegian, Council P. Hahn, P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R. Lind, Economic Development L. Warren, City Attorney ® ERG REPORT ERC MEETING DATE: Project Name: Owner: Applicant: Contact: File Number: Project Manager: Project Summary: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area SF' Site Area: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City of Renton Department of Planning I Building I Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT December 10, 2007 Seahawks' Headquarters and Practice Facility Pier Football NW, LLC Alan Foltz; Waterfront Construction, Inc.; 205 NE Northlake Way, Suite 230; Seattle W A 98105 Alan Foltz; 206-548-9800 LUA07-137, SM, ECF, SA-A Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner The applicant has proposed construction of a new pier to replace an existing pier. The existing wooden, float pier is 123 feet long by 6 [eel wide, held in position by 12-inch wood piling. The existing pier would be completely removed. The new pier would be located approximatley 210 feet south of the existing pier location. The new pier would be 150 feet long and between 3 [cell 0.5 inches and 5 feet 10.5 inches wide. The full open grate deck would be supported by 18 steel pilings of 6- inches in diameter. The deck surface would be a minimum 2 feet 6 inches above the Ordinary High Water. The project requires a Shoreline Subslantial Development Permit from the City ofRc'Illon. 5015 Ripley Lane N N/A N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): Proposed New Bldg. Area (gras.I): Total Building Area GSF: N/A N/A N/A Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) Project Location Map ERe Report Ol-13l (rn/doc City of Renton PIBIPW Departmen SEAIIAWKS' HEADQUARTERS AND PRACTICE FACILITY PIER LUA07-137,S1\,f, ECF, SA-A Report of December 10, 2007 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION I BACKGROUND F.nvirol tal Review Committee StQilRcpo1't Page 2 01'9 The proposed land use action, construction of a new picr to replace an existing wood dock, would take place on the shore of and over Lake Washington at the Scahawks' Headquarters and Training Facility in Northcast Renton. [Exhibit I] The completed project would be used by staff at the Seahawks' Headquarters and may periodically be used to ferry the public from remote parking locations during summer training camp. The pier would be a day-use facility. No permanent storage, maintenance, or washing of marine vessels would be allowed. No lighting for night use is proposed. The upland area of the project site is zoned Commercial/Residential/Office, which implements the policies of the Commcrcial/Residential/Office Comprehensive Plan land usc designation. [Exhibit 2] The Seahawks' Headquarters and Training Facility (LUA06-073) is currently under construction, with project completion anticipated for summer 2008. [Exhibit 3] The proposed pier would be located at the northwest portion of the site, at thc terminus ofthe public access walkway, west of the Indoor Practice Facility. The proposed project would replace an existing wood, floating dock with a new pier. The existing dock is 6 feet wide and 123 feet in length. It is hcld in place by 6 pilings 12-inches in diameter. The existing dock is in disrepair, potentially dangerous to navigation and nearby moored watercraft, and possibly an attractive nuisance. [Exhibit 4] The existing dock is located approximately 55 feet south of the multi-slip, 195 foot long Misty Cove Condominiums dock, at its nearest point. The proposed pier location would position the new pier about 265 feet from the Misty Cove dock. [Exhibit 5] The work area for the proposed project would consist of a portion of nearshore Lake Washington, approximately 200 feet long and 200 feet wide. Lake Washington in this area ranges from 2-feet to about 15-feet deep. Although the immediate shoreline at the present time has minimal vegetation, restoration of the shoreline with native vegetation is plmmed as part of the Seahawks' project. [Exhibit 6] The project site would be approached by water and no access by land would be required for either demolition or construction. Some storage of equipment may occur on-shore, if suitable area is available. Over-water work would require use of a construction barge. Spuds (long steel poles attached to the barge) would be lowered to the lake bed and locked in place to stabilize the barge platform. Spuds are used to prevent excessive movement of the barge when heavy loads are transferred by crane. Additional equipment required would include small, power- driven equipment including compressors, generators, drills, welders, and hand tools. A small powerboat may be on-sitc for safety, spill prevention, and to direct work. All work would take place during daylight hours, in keeping with City of Renton approved hours of construction. A crane mounted on the barge would be fitted with a vibratory insertion/extraction system and would remove the existing 12-inch diameter timber piling and dolphin. Vibratory hammers operate not by impact, but by vibrating and pulling the pile from its seat in the sediments. If extraction is not possible, or if a pile breaks during the cxtraction procedure, it would be cut off below the mud line and covered with clean sand. The dismantled dock material would be liUed by crane and stored on the construction barge for subsequent removal from Lake Washington and ofj~site disposal at an approved location. Shoreline restoration, ineluding removal of scrap lumber that has collected on the site and planting of native vegetation appropriate to the location, would enhance the shoreline following removal of the dock. [Exhibit 7] An existing boathouse would remain at the existing dock site. Following its use lor the dock demolition, the barge with all required materials, equipment, and pre-fabricated sections of the proposed new dock would be repositioned to the construction location, located approximately 210 ERC Report 07-137 (rev}.doc City of Renton PlB/PHI Departmer SEAHA WKS' H EADQlJARTERS AND PRACTICE FACILITY PIER LUA07-J37, SkI, ECF, SA-A Report of December 10, 2007 Em'iro ,tal Re"ie'tv Committee ,)'taffReport Page 3 of9 feet south of the existing dock site. [Exhibit 6] The proposed picr would be in proximity to and accessed Irom a connecting pathway to the public trail along the shoreline. The proposcd pier would be 150 feet long. The additional length, 27 feet beyond the length of the existing dock, is needed to reach lake depths suitable for vessels expected at this location. The pier surface would be constructed with full open deck grating at widths varying from 3 feet 10.5 inches to 5 feet 10.5 inches. The deck surface would be 2 feet 6 inches above the Ordinary High Water (OHW). Support would be provided by 15 new 6-inch diameter, epoxy-coated steel pilings and 3 new 6-inch diameter epoxy- coated steel batter piling, which would position the pier a minimum of 18 inches above OHW. [Exhibit 8] The piling would be driven to refusal using the barge-mounted vibratory hammer. The steel piling would be cut to final elevation and fitted with prefabricated pile cap saddle assemblies. The cap beam assemblies would then be installed, leveled, and welded to the beam assemblies and fastened with through bolts. Miscellaneous hardware such as comer brackets and remaining deck grating would then be installed to complete the pier. The proposed project would require a 404 Permit Irom the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers following Endangered Species Act Section 7 review by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. A Joint Aquatic Resource Permit Application (JARPA) has been submitted by the applicant. Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) from the Washington State Department ofFish and Wildlife (OFW) would also be required. Washington State Department of Natural Resources (ONR) approval may be required for work on aquatic lands within the Inner Harbor. The removal of the existing dock and constlUction of the new dock would take place over a period of three to four weeks during an approved constlUction "window" (see "Fish and Wildlife" section, below), probably in July 2008. Approximately one clay would be required to deliver and anchor the barge, 2 to 4 days to pull the old piles and remove the old dock, 3 to 5 days to drive the new piles for the pier, 10 to 12 days to install the new pier. and one day to clean-up and remove the barge. Restoration of the shoreline would take place prior to project completion. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.2IC.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review acldresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal. staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Isslle a DNS with a 14-day Appeal Period. B. Mitigation Measllres Mitigation for the project would consist of impact avoidance and minimization actions that have been designed into the proposed project. This mitigation includes implementation of pier design recOlnmendations as necessary to achieve no-net-loss of productive capacity of aquatic habitat. Compensatory mitigation would include removal of the existing wood pier, associated wood pile, and debris that has accumulated along the shoreline. The shoreline will be planted as part of the Seahawks' Headquarters and Training Facility project. All maintenance and monitoring of the shoreline restoration is included in thc Scahawks' Headquarters and Training Facility project approval (LUA06-073). No additional mitigation is proposed. ERe Report 07-137 (rev}.doc City orRen ton PIBIPW Departme, Em'irol tal Revint' Commitlee StaflReport SEAHA WKS' lIEADQUARTERS AND PRACTICE FACILITY PIER LUA1I7-137, SM, ECF, SA~A Report of December 10, 2007 C. Exhibits Exhibit I Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Vicinity Map Zoning Map Seahawks' Headquarters and Training Facility (LUA-06-073) Existing Dock and Piling in Lake Washington to be Removed Page 4 of9 Exhibit 5 Exhibit 6 Location of Misty Cove Dock, Existing Dock to be Removed, and Proposed Pier Shoreline Restoration Plan, Revised 08/02107 Exhibit 7 Exhibit 8 Existing Lake Washington Shoreline Looking South from Existing Dock Proposed Pier Plan, Elevation, and Construction Details D. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various Citv Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Slafj'reviewers have identified that the proposal is likelv to have the following probable impacts: 1. Earth Impacts: The majority of the project would occur over thc waters of Lake Washington. Impacts on the shoreland would include removal of an existing dock where it intersects with the shore of Lake Washington and construction of a new pier approximately 210 feet south. Limited storage of equipmcnt may occur on the Seahawks' Headquarters and Training Facility property, if a suitable location is available, but no construction staging or storage of materials would take place, Although no substantial change to the upland would he anticipated by this proposed project, there may be a minimal impact due to increased wave action on the shoreline where it is devoid of stabilizing vegetation. This may occur where the existing dock would be removed and continue until new vegetation becomes establishcd. Ovcr time, the erosion rate would decrease as native plants grow and spread along the shoreline. Where new pilings would be located, wave action would be attcnuatcd and erosion potential would be decreased with the project. The shoreline is currently protected from erosion by measures required by the Seahawks' project approval, that would remain in place through proposed project completion. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is proposed. Nexus: Not applicable 2. Water (Wetland, Streams, Lakes) Impacts: The project is proposed to occur over the waters of Lake Washington, within the designated Inner Harbor. The shoreline designation for Lake Washington at this location is "Urban Environment" (RMC 4-3- 090G). There is a wetland locatcd approximately 700 feet farther south along the shoreline from the proposed pier site. This wetland would not be affected by the proposed project. There are no creeks, streams, or other surface water bodies located on the site. A drainageway of the Gypsy Creek Drainage Basin has a pipe outfall located approximately 420 feet south of the proposed picr intersection with the shoreline. The applicant submitted, "Stream and Lake Study: Dock Replacement," (Study) by Ccdarock Consultants, Inc., dated October 2, 2007, with the land use master application. The Study conforms with the requirements for Standard Streams and Lakes Studies (RMC 4-8-120(0). Discussion ofthe Study is included in this section of the report and in the "Vegetation" and "Wildlife" sections, below. nIlC Report 07-137 (rev). doc City of Renton P/B/PfrV Deparlmen l:.,'nviror SEAHAWKS' IIEADQUARTERS AND PRACTICE FACILITY PIER LUA07-137, SM, ECF, SA-A Report of December 10, 2007 fal Revierv Committee StqflReporf Page 5 0[9 Vegetation adjacent to streams and lakes can improve water quality by fillcring pollutanls, rcmoving nutrients, and preventing sediment introduction, Nalivc planted areas of approximately 100 feet in width are nonnally required to preserve riparian water quality function where natural routing of water through buffers is preservcd and relied upon for water quality protection. lIowever, source control and water quality best management practices are recognized as more important for urban settings where slonnwalcr runoff is not reliant on riparian conditions for treatment before discharge, In this area, water quality treatment function is provided by the proposed Seahawks' Headquarters development and not by the riparian area, According to the Study, water quality function of the existing on-site riparian area is poor. Under existing conditions virtually no vegetation is present adjacent to Lake Washington, There are also steep slopes adjacent to the Lake, so nonnal water quality treatment process is virtually absent. Surface water runs directly across the narrow riparian areas and receives very little natural treatment. This will improve when the riparian area is replanted following construction of the Scahawks' site, The proposed pier would not interfere with the approved planting plan, Some minor, temporary impacts to water quality would occur during the construction during removal of the 6 existing wood piles and installation ofthe 18 new steel piles, Pile installation would meet guidelines required by the DFW to minimize both temporary and long tenn impacts, Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is proposed, Nexus: Not applicable 3. Vegetation Impacts: Until recently, the shoreline vegetation at the project site consisted of Himalayan blackberry, Scotch broom, red alder, black cottonwood, and various willow species, which grew to the water's edge, Although shoreline areas (which include a lakeshore wetland) typically provide the highest habitat value in the project area, the habitat value ofthe shoreline at the project site has been negatively impacted by the long-tenll industrial use of thc property, The timber-processing operation and absence of shoreline stewardship has resulted in vegetation that lacks diversity, stmcture, and habitat features, As part of the Seahawks' Headquarters and Training Facility development, non-native vegetation along the shoreline was removed and, at the time of this report, the shoreline is being protected by water quality protection measures, A shoreline restoration plan, approvcd as part ofthc Seahawks' Headquarters and Training Facility, would be implemented following construction in the area, thereby improving the riparian value ofthe area, The restoration plan consists entirely of native species of forb, shrub, and tree canopy layers, Shoreline restoration will take place where the existing dock would be removed and at the location of the proposed pIer. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is proposed. Nexus: Not applicable 4. Fish and Wildlife Impacts: Aquatic and wildlife habitat on the site consists of a Class 1 lake and associated riparian zones, At the project site, these features have been heavily impacted by a long history of industrial land use (timber processing) and the resulting associated contamination of both the upland and the lake bottom, t-RC Repurt 07-137 (rel),doc City (~lRenton P/B/PW~ Departmen Lnl'irOl SEAIIAWKS' HEADQUARTERS /llYD PRACTlCE FA ClLlTY PIER LUA07-137, SM, ECF, SA-A Rep011 of December 10, 2007 al Revie"\V Committee Slqtf Report Page 60f9 According to the Stream and Lake Study, Lake Washington supports a variety of anadromous salmonids, including Chinook, coho, and sockeye salmon, steelhead and cutthroat trout. Runs of non-anadromous kokanee salmon are also present and bull trout have been observed_ Lake Washington contains a wide variety ofnon-salmonid species, some of which arc considered "warm water" species_ These include both native and non-native species, such as speckled dace, three-spine stickleback, northem squaw fish, yellow perch, black crappie, largcmouth bass, small mouth bass, mountain whitefish, largcscale sucker, longfin smelt, and prickly sculpin among other species_ The data available lists scveral "species of concern" that may be in the vicinity of the proposed action, including Chinook salmon, bull trout, Dolly Varden trout, stcc1head, coho salmon, and pink salmon_ The proposed pier has been designed to meet DFW and NMFS recommendations for new docks with respect to minimizing impacts on migrating fish_ Adult salmon migrate further offshore and would not be affected by the pier. Juvenile salmonides, however, migrate along the shoreline and may be cautious of overhead structures and piles due to their use by potential predators_ Agencies generally rccommend an elevated structure with minimal pile use and dock width near shore wherever possible_ To meet these guidelines, the proposed stmeture would be a minimum of 18 inches above the water (at high lake level), would be only four feet wide within 30 feet of the shore, and would have no piles within 18 feet of shore_ In addition, the deck would be fully grated to allow sunlight to pass through the structure and minimize potential predator habitat. Canada geese have been observed in both the vegetated and hardscape shoreline areas_ The geese were observed nesting along the vegetated shoreline and in the osprey nest located near the Puget Sound Energy (PSE) substation nesting platform_ Canada geese and bald eagles have occasionally been observed perching on the nest platform during the winter months_ It is assumed the bald eagles used the perch site to forage for fish and waterfowl along the lake shoreline_ Three bald eagle nest sites have been historically rep0l1ed between 0_8 and 0.9 miles west ancl northwest of the site on Mercer Island_ Two of the nest sites arc not known to have been used for the last several years_ The third nest was reported active in 2006_ PSE moved an osprey ncst from a retired distribution pole on the Baxter site to a new nest pole platform erceted on the south side of the substation in 1993_ PSE also placed a crossbar on top ofthe tirst transmission pole leading away from the station to provide a safc place for the birds to perch_ The osprey successfully nested on the new platform from 1993 until 1997, when the osprey built a new nest at the top of the wood chip elevator located on the Barbee Mill site to the south of the property_ Osprey continue to return to the area and successfully breed. Osprcy arc present in the area from mid-March through August. Osprey have been observed hunting small mammals (likely mice) on the Seahawks' Headquartcrs and Training Facility site, as well as tishing the lake. Beaver have been observed in wetland habitat along the lake shoreline and in the Gypsy Subbasin Drainage east of the site_ Pond sliders have been observed on floating logs_ Red-winged blackbirds were observed using cattail habitat in the project vicinity_ Snipe were observed in the cottonwood sapling-dominated areas upland. Other species of passerine birds and amphibians could be supported along the shoreline and the narrow red alder-dominated upland shoreline arca_ Numerous duck species also use the otIshore area adjacent to the site. Although the site has little wildlife habitat, there is the possibility that the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Right-of-Way provides corridor habitat to wildlife tolerant of urban situations. This potential wildlife area abuts the site on its east side_ There is limited habitat along the shoreline immediately adjacent to Lake Washington_ The current lack of mature native canopy limits ncsting and foraging habitat for most species_ It is anticipated that this habitat will improve as the restored shoreline matures_ ERe Report 07-137 (''e\~_doc City a/Renton PlBIPW Depur/men SEAHAWKS' lIEADQUARTERS AND PRACl1CE FACILITYPlER LUA07-J37, SM, EeF, SA-A Report of December 10,2007 EnvirOf tal Rel'iey\l Committee S"u{tTReport Page 7 of9 The pier design will be reviewed by DFW as part of the hydraulic project approval process and fully meets their requirements, including the following: • Locate structures above the ordinary high water to minimize effects on the shoreline and allow maximum light penetration. The new dock would be located a minimum 0/18 inches above the Ordinary High Water (OHW) a/the lake. • Use environmentally sensitive dock materials. No treated wood products would he used helow the OHW Piles would cons"·t 0/ epo,y-coated steel pile, without coal tar ingredients. a/the minimum size necessary to support the structure. • Minimize overhead and inwater structure in the nearshore enviromnent. The structure would be the minimum length necessary to reach water depths requiredfor boats expected to use the dock The dock width would not exceed sixfeet in the loading and unloading areas and would be onlyfourfeet wide within 30feet of the shore. No piles would be placed within i8/eet o/the shoreline. • Minimize overwater coverage and shading. The deck would befully grated to allow sunlight to pass through the structure and minimize potential predator habitat. Steel-grated decking would pass 60 percent o/the natural light to the lake environment helow • Constmction timing. Inwater work in the south end of Lake Washington is limited by the Corps of Engineers to two short work windows, November i6 to December 31 and July 16 to .Iuly 31. The proposed project would be wnstruded within one oj'these windnws or as otherwise allowed by state or/ederal entities. Timing 0/ inwater or over,vater work at Lake Washington is not regulated by the Citv a/Renton. The project would not disturb or remove any significant functional benefit ofthe shoreline. As noted herein, the existing condition provides minimal value, but is planned for improvement as part of the Seahawks' project constmction. The removal of an existing wood floating dock from the lake and replaecment with a more environmentally sensitive structure would somewhat further improve ecological function, primarily due to the dock removal. This partially sunken structure may currently be providing predator habitat. Its replacement would meet all environmental protection requirements for new docks. Mitigation Measnres: No mitigation is proposed. Nexus: Not applicable 5. Environmcntaillcalth a. Environmental Health Hazards Impacts: The potential hazards to public health and safety at the site would be reduced by the removal of the derelict dock and replacement by a new pier. The shoreline will be accessible to the public by a paved pathway, as a condition of approval of the Seahawks' Headquarters and Training Facility. The proposed pier, however, would not be accessible to the public, unless it is used as a component of a public-ferry system (see "'Transportation," below). Pier access by the general public would be controlled by a fence and locked gatc. Shoreline access would not be affected. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is proposed. Nexus: Not applicable b. Noise Impacts: During the 3 to 4 week construction period, there wonld be noise from the barge-mounted crane, small power tools (drills, welders), compressors, generators, and hand tools. A small powerboat used during construction would also create noise. ERC Report 07-137 (rel).doc Ci(v of Renton P/BIPfV Departmen EnvinJ! SEAHAWKS' HEADQUARTERS AND PRACTICE FACILITY PIER LUA07-137, SM, ECF, SA-A Rep0l1 of December 1 (), 2007 tal Review Committee Staff Report PageSof9 The project would be subject to City of Renton regulations that control noise during construction (see "Advisory Notes to Applicant," helow), Following construction, the increased use ofthe pier would result in more noise than previously, This noise would be mitigated somewhat hy the relocation of the pier south from the ncarest residential units, Misty Cove Condominiums. The applicant has stated that the pier would only be used during daylight hours. Mitigation Measnres: No mitigation is proposed. Nexus: Not applicable 6. Transportation Impacts: The proposed pier would not increase upland vehicular traffic and may decrease street traffic slightly as staff and players use boats to commute to the site, Use ofthe dock for commuting to the Seahawks Headquarters and Training Facility would be expected to occur in summer months only and would consist of about 20 trips a day, In addition to use for commuting, the pier may be utilized as part of a ferry system, to and from an off-site parking area, during the practice sessions that are open to the public for 3-weeks each summer. The volume oftrattic for this use would be about 50 trips per day, Boat use in the area should increase, but this would not be the result of the replacement pier, but rather the change in land use of the adjoining land, Mitigation Measnres: No mitigation is proposed. Nexus: Not applicable E. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report andlor "Advisory Notes to Applicant:· ,( Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may he attached to this report. Environmental Determination AD Deal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, December 31,2007. Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 O,B governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing at the City Clerk's office along with a $75,00 application fee. Additional infonnation regarding the appeal process may be ohtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7th Floor, 1055 S, Grady Way, Renton W A 98057, ERe Report 07-137 Irev}.doc Ci(y of Renton P/B/PW Dcpartmer Enviro tal Review Committee ,)'u4f Report SEAHAWKS' HEADQUARTERS AND PRACTICE FACILITY PIER LUA07~137,SM, ECF, SA-A Report of December 10, 2007 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT Page 9 of9 The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as in/ormation only, they are not suhject to the appeal process/or the land use actions. Planning: I. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a,m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be pennitted on Sundays. Water: 1. If water service is to be provided to the pier, an appropriate back flow device will be required. Sanitary Sewer: 1. There are no City of Renton sanitary sewer mains existing in the location of the proposed dock. Applicant needs to verify ifthere is to be any plumbing out to the dock. 2. The applicant needs to coordinate with the King County Wastewater Division for locates prior to and during construction around the Mercer Island Force Main. General: I. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. All civil engineering plans shall be tied into a minimum of two of the City of Renton current Horizontal and Vertical Control network. 3. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of the fee must be paid upon application [or building and construction pennits, and the remainder when the pennits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. ERC Repurt 07-137 (re\).duc , I'RDJa::T IlE:JIGNED i1r'; 205 NE tJORTHl)J(E WAV, ~u~ 230 SEATIl.£. WA. 1)6105 (2lI6) Mf!-9S00 VICINITY MAP INO SCALE LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1/4 SEC; Sill 2!I-:l4H-D5E TAXlOT j! 292.405 9015- 2924D5 15 ~BAjI(JE~ PAfi:'CEL NOIm1'"' RENTON Lt.JA.-OO-Ooll4 UA REC NO ZOO101009U000.5 WCH IS POR OF SW 1/4-29-24-05 l'1' WLY OF BN RR CO R/W LAn 4-7 3,2" 14-" LONG: -122" 11· 5J~ KENMORE i! , I •• JUANITA RENTON IAREA MJiljScale:1 "=3mil~ EXHIBIT 1 Of • 32 T24N R5E W 1/2 .. ZONING e +~+ = TBCBNlCAL BERVICl!I I I r CA EXHIBIT o 200 ",00 2 , ..... 29 T24N R5E W 112 S4Z9 SlNIH'SVM N01N~~ ~ J11 is:lMHHmN 1lV9100~ ~lljl:>e.::l e:>lpeJd s~Me4ees ~ ~I . -:: ~ ~ .• ' " 1 E-< >-< co >-< ('<) ::r:: >< ~ Existing dock and piling in Lake Washington to be removed. EXHIBIT 4 9~96 Vilo ·NO.lN3~ lI.'.lU NOl~NIHS'I'Iio 3l1Yl ;Ll:r; 'SS3<1OO'1' lJ.JSOO '1:I:38r1 '" --' « u '" 0 Z "-a. « '" ~ Z (3 :> \ / , f , , 5' / , /~ , " , / , , / , , / , , / ~ ~ ~ 0 , , / , , ~:I \ 0. . 1 g c ~ I~ 0.: ~ i' '" " 1~ , , -------------------------------------------j t-< ~ c:q ~ \Cl ::c: >< ~ , ; , i i I , , I , ; i , l , I , , ~ I 'i ~1 " 'I i ~; ~: , , ,j , : 'I 1 :j ! " 1 ~ !; ~ .j ~ -':! J i} '" -'< u a Q , " I, (.) C> 1 " ~ ·s .1 i£ -<: j :<;~ ., -li I:::~ j ':S.:2 C> " r2~ , Existing Lake Washington shoreline looking south from the existing dock. Dimensional lumber and trash will be removed from the lake. EXHIBIT 7 00 " ~~ ~M ". ~~ \ ~ o~ "I'~ EI .. 0 ,::'!!! 1'T'1!n'1m .~~~ " ;, ~I' i i~;~ " 0 N'!!! PfMi[J1 .'-'-'-"~ b .! 15< ~ 5; ;, ~-~~ ,~ ". ~j ~~ " ~~ ~~ I ? 0 l~ ,. Q.- C~ >~ g~~ ~~ " 0" ~cl ~~ -,Sill r1t ~: ~~ , . ~ t~ Ji~ t~~ ) N N I J: <: <> 15 z " :> ~ z ~ O~ Z §~ '" 0 :~ , !.l < l '" iJ! 0 , ~ 0 w "-'" ~ iil 0 " "- "-• ~ / -- ~-, 0 '" , ,-, /'" ,0 '.-.~-. m N Cj ~ W CO '" --"~ .. 15 II :> , " .,.. --. L---- '5 < ~ "-;, ~ II SOCIUS GROUP,.,. December 3, 2007 VIA LEGAL MESSENGER Elizabeth Higgins PlanninglBuildingiPublic Works Department City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W A 98055 Re: Seahawks Practice Facility Pier, LUA07-137 Dear Ms. I-liggins: . .::C6.a33.~11oJO "!\',DI -tt,. )Cb 8:~tl91 0 I '.'A,', i-,\/ Iv,'.1 UIII~lIl SIIIIOlW 60 1 UnIO~ ~;1. SUite 4050 Sl·d~lc. VIiA 981:)1 Thomas F. Peterson 206.838.9112 tpeterson@sociusJaw.com This law firm represents the Misty Cove Association of Apartment Owners ("Misty Cove"). As you know, Misty Cove Condominium is located on the property immediately adjacent to the north of the Seahawks Training Facility. We provide this letter by way of our comments to the Seattle Seahawks' ("Applicant's") request for environmental (SEPA) review, Site Plan Review, and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for a 150 foot dock. Transportation Facility, Misty Cove is concerned that the proposed development is more than a dock, but rather is a transportation facility. The Application states that it will be used to "ferry the public from remote parking locations during summer training camp." (Project Narrative at § 9.) Further, during peak times, "approximately 50 trips per day could occur." (ld) In other words, during a 10 hour day, a ferry would be loading or offloading ferry passengers every 12 minutes. The dock will be located at the terminus of the public access route. That route runs adjacent to Misty Cove's south boundary line and begins at the intersection ofthe entrance to Misty Cove. We are not sure how large the boats (or ferries) are the Applicant plans to use, but it could result in literally thousands of Seahawks fans streaming past the Misty Cove residences and entrance on a daily basis. This will no doubt cause a constant and tremendous amount of noise and litter and expose Misty Cove to vandalism and trespass. In addition, Misty Cove has a small marina near 24273 .' {/ C i II .' / 1I /1'. i {/ Iii Elizabeth Higgins December 3, 2007 Page 2 the proposed new dock. The heavy new boat traflic will interfere with Misty Cove residents' use and enjoyment of their own dock. There is nothing in the Application that addresses these enormous, unanticipated burdens on Misty Cove. The proposed dock and associated ferry crossing could be deemed a "Transportation Crossing" under RMC 4-3-050. As such, additional criteria are required for approval. Not the least of which, it must be determined that the "proposed route is determined to have the least impact on the environment." There is no evidence of such a determination in the Application. Interference with Use of Shoreline and Water. RMC 4-3-090 (L)(l2) specifically regulates piers and docks. It provides that "Piers and Docks shall be designed to minimize interference with the public use and enjoyment of the water surface and shoreline." The applicant must "affirmatively demonstrate the need for the proposed dock." The City's approval must include a finding that the following criteria have been met: The dock or pier length does not extend beyond a length necessary to provide reasonable and safe moorage. The dock or pier does not interfere with the public use and enjoyment of the water nor create a hazard to navigation. The dock or pier will not result in the unreasonable interference with the use of adjacent docks and/or piers. The Application fails to demonstrate any need for the proposed dock. Moreover, its design and proposed use will greatly interfere with Misty Cove residents' use and enjoyment of the water and shoreline. It will convert a quiet residential area into a pedestrian thoroughfare for potentially thousands of celebratory fans. At 150 feet, the dock is also quite long. It will be much longer than the existing dock and, because it will be attached to land located westerly of the existing dock location, it will extend far west of the prior dock and Misty Cove marina. Boaters will have to navigate around the dock to cruise the shoreline or gain access to the Misty Cove marina. In addition, the large boats and ferries moored there will block views of Lake Washington southward from Misty Cove. Unsightly, Useless Boathouse. Misty Cove welcomes the removal of the existing piers which are an environmental detriment, a boating hazard, and an eyesore. However, removal of the vestiges of the existing dock will render the existing boathouse useless. It is an ugly, falling down tin shack that blocks views from Misty Cove. Since it will not be functional and is an eyesore, it should be removed along with the rest of the existing dock. 24273 Elizabeth Higgins December 3, 2007 Page 3 Mitigation Required. Misty Cove does not necessarily oppose a dock per se. However, in order to make the proposed dock compliant with environmental and shoreline policies and regulations, the city should impose mitigation requirements that will minimize the potential adverse impacts on Misty Cove residents. Misty Cove requests that the following mitigation measures be imposed if the city approves the Application. 24273 I. The Seahawks should be required to route pedestrian traffic ferried from remote parking facilities southward off the dock towards the Seahawks practice fields and not along the public access route past Misty Cove. 2. The Seahawks should be required to provide security and clean·up for large groups of dock users such as ferried parking passengers. 3. The Seahawks should provide additional physical security structures at the entrance to Misty Cove to protect Misty Cove from trespass, vandalism, and litter associated with public use of the dock. 4. The Stream and Lake Study states that "access to the dock will be prevented by a fence and locked gate." (Stream and Lake Study, p. 7.) This should be made an express condition of any permit issued. 5. The Settlement Agreement between Football Northwest LLC ("FNW") and Misty Cove dated November 16, 2006 provides that, "[iJf FNW builds a dock on the north half of their Project site in the future, then for a period of 15 years after dock completion, FNW will prohibit overnight moorage of any boat larger that 45 feet in length." A condition at least this stringent should be a requirement of any permit issued. 6. The Project Narrative states that no dock lighting is proposed. Any permit should require that if any lights are installed to illuminate the new dock, Misty Cove will have an opportunity to review and comment on the lighting plans prior to approval or installation to insure that such lighting is not an annoyance to Misty Cove residents. 7. With construction of the new dock, the existing boat house will be rendered useless as it will no longer be associated with a dock. The boathouse is an eyesore and blocks views from Misty Cove. The city should require removal of the boathouse as a condition of permit approval. · .' Elizabeth Higgins December 3, 2007 Page 4 Misty Cove requests that the City and the Applicant consider these comments and make the appropriate changes. If you have any questions about these comments or if we can provide any additional information, do not hesitate to contact me. cc: Roger Pearce (via U.S. Mail) Misty Cove Association of Apartment Owners 24273 City, nton Department of Planning! Building / PUbhC Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: tonst1111jr'hn COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 3, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA07-137, SM, ECF, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 19, 2007 APPLICANT: Alan Foltz PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: Sea hawks Practice Facility Pier PLAN REVIEW: Ameta Henninger SITE AREA: NIA BUILDING AREA (gross): NIA RECEIVED LOCATION: 5015 Riple Lane N I WORK ORDER NO: 77844 NOV ; ; i'i',/ SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested an Environmental Determination. Administrative Site Plan l3.eview and Approval, and Shoreline Substantial Development Pemnit for construction of a new pier (dock) to be 10cate9Id/lUlIII0MI\l~§l:bh. The pier would be associated with the Sea hawks Headquarters and Training Facility. The west end of the pier would be 150 feet from the edge of Lake Washington. The pier would be 5 feet 10-112 inch wide, except for the east 30 feet of the pier, which would be 3 feet 10- 112 inches wide. The pier would replace an existing 6-foot wide, 123-foot long dock that would be removed. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earlh Housinq Air Aesthetics Water Li hI/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans ortation Environmental Health Public Services Energyl Historic/Cultura! Natura! Resources Preservation Airport Env/{onment 10.000 Feet 14,000 Feel B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addilional information is cy';!;operIY assess this proposal. I 2-3 Gl-::; Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ..... -Fwd: Dec 3 Seahawks dork , From: Elizabeth Higgins To: Tucker, Stacy Date: Subject: 12/03/2007 2:30: 15 PM Fwd: Dec 3 Sea hawks dock Please add this to the yellow file. I have a copy, she is on the PoR list for 07-137. Thank you! »> "Skyleen" <skyleen@skynetbb.com> 12/03/07 2: 15 PM >>> Date: December 03, 2007 To: E. Higgins, Sr. Planner City of Renton Re: Seahawks Practice Facility Pier Notice/Application for Pier Extension From: E. Halverson Party of Record 5021 Ripley Lane N #302/303 Renton Wash 98056 Mailing Address: 16226 Crystal Dr. E Enumclaw Wash. 98022 As an owner of Misty Cove, the condo building adjacent to this project, I object to this application for extension of the present dock for numerous reasons. Firstly, the questions were asked by MC owners in the early meetings with the SH representatives what their plans were for the dock presently and future use. One of the concerns was the quantity and size of boat crafts and time length vessels would be moored at a facility dock. As I recall, it was discussed the present dock would be replaced (as it is only a floating dock I believe) and larger boats would not be moored there (to block the view for MC residents) for a period of time, possibly the 15 yr length of the agreement between SH and MC. At no time did the SH representatives state in their plan requests an increase in the length of their dock. A longer dock provides more available space for longer, larger craft to further block views to Lake Washington and Mercer Island. Possibly a longer dock allows commercial use rather than the strictly small craft, private use as is the MC dock. To now request a &ubstantial addition to their dock further erodes the long sought after agreement to protect the view from all levels and sides of MC. That agreement has already been amended to alter the original intent and is not acceptable to this south side owner whose view is impacted by every one of these changes. MC in the late 1980s, early 1990s rebuilt part of their existing dock. At the time, a request was made in the permit process to extend that dock to accommodate a few visitor slips since there were none. The request was denied with the information any extensions were not permitted because the dock was at the maximum length allowed. The Muckleshoot Tribe controlled any activities for the shoreline and approval was necessary from them for MC to repair the dock and restore the property bulkhead. Almost 2 decades later with more restrictive environmental regulations, how can the SH be allowed a pier/dock addition when the property next door was denied the same request a small distance away? Is the lake, shoreline any different there or is it the Allen/Seahawk factor driving the City of Renton to permit anything requested by them? The inequity is unfair to a 40 yr old property next door which previously Page 1 ,. ...... Fwd: Dec 3 Seahawks doc.k requested the same. I respectively submit these objections for this application to the City of Renton. Eileen Halverson 3606632433 Page 2 City of /"Ienton Department of Planning I Building I Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT R:u"i<;s 1);0+. COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 3, 2007 ;-, APPLICATION NO: LUA07-137. SM. ECF, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 19, 2007 ~ :z c ;:: APPLICANT: Alan Foltz PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins z I ,) Sea hawks Practice Facility Pier PLAN REVIEW: Arneta Henninger -< rv '1 PROJECT TITLE: 0 " -'" m SITE AREA: NIA BUILDING AREA (gross): NIA :>J ,....., i(;~ ..... = LOCATION: 5015 Riple Lane N WORK ORDER NO: 77844 ~'--.J LIJ ", SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested an Environmental Determination. Administrative Site Plan Review and Approval. and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit lor constnuction of a new pier (dock) to be located on Lake Washington, The pier would be associated with the Seahawks Headquarters and Training Facility, The west end of the pier would be 150 feet from the edge of Lake Washington, The pier would be 5 feet 10-1/2 inch wide, except for the east 30 feet of the pier, which would be 3 feet 10- 1/2 inches wide, The pier would replace an existing 6-foot wide. 123-loot long dock that would be removed, A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e,g, Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element Df the Probable Probable Mo," Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earlh Housm Aw Aesthetics Warer LighUGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Ufllities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy! Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ~ ~;;o B, POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS ~WlAM~;b ~~. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is eded to properly assess this proposal. CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: November 27, 2007 Elizabeth Higgins Ameta Henninger X7298 SEAHAWKS PRACTICE FACILITY DOCK APPLICATION LUA 07-137 LAKE WASHINGTON I have completed my review on the Facility Dock application located in Section 29, Township 24N, Range 5 E and have the following comments. WATER: o This project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. o There are no existing watennains on this west side of the parcel. o If the project is going to provide waler service to the dock an appropriate back flow device will be required. SANITARY SEWER: o There are no City of Renton sanitary sewer mains existing in the location of the proposed dock. The applicant needs to coordinate with the King County Wastewater Division for locates prior to and during construction around the Mercer Island Force Main. o Applicant needs to verifY if there is to be any plumbing oul to the dock. STORM DRAINAGE: o There are no storm drainage facilities at the location of the dock site. Applicant is reminded to comply with outside agencies such as Department of Fisheries and JARPA. GENERAL: • All required utility, drainage and streel improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. • All civil engineering plans shall be tied into a minimum of two of the City of Renton current Horizontal and Vertical Control network. • Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. cc: Kayren K. City of "en ton Department of Planning / Building / PUb/,C Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICA TION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 3, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA07-137, SM, ECF, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 19, 2007 APPLICANT: Alan Foltz PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth HiQQins PROJECT TITLE: Seahawks Practice Facility Pier PLAN REVIEW: Arneta Henninqer SITE AREA: NIA BUILDING AREA (qross): NIA LOCATION: 5015 Riple Lane N I WORK ORDER NO: 77844 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested an Environmental Determination, Administrative..liijft RI~n8'1Yi\l,"I' <\I1d Approval, and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for construction of a new pier (dock) to be located on ta1(e'Vtl~hl1IJj9'tiir1(TKe pier would be associated with the Sea hawks Headquarters and Training Facility. The west end of the pier would be 150 feet from the edge ofLake Washington. The pier would be 5 feet 10-1/2 inch wide, except for the east 30 feet of the pier, which would be 3 feet 10- 1/2 inches wide. The pier would replace an existing 6-foot wide, 123-foot long dock that would be removed, A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable M",. Element of the Probable Probable Mo ... Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housin9 Air Aesthetics Water UqhtJGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans ortation Environmental Health Public Services Energyl Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas Whe:e!13~ation is ne ded to properly assess this proposal. .::2 l fJ DJ (; J Signature of irector or Authorized Representative Date City of kenton Department of Planning I Building I Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:i ntf'6Ct~(~ch'<;:y\ COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 3, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA07-137, SM, ECF, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 19, 2007 APPLICANT: Alan Foltz PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: Sea hawks Practice Facility Pier PLAN REVIEW: Arneta Henninger SITE AREA: NIA BUILDING AREA (gross): NIA LOCATION: 5015 Riple Lane N WORK ORDER NO: 77844 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested an Environmental Determination, Administrativll.! liitl'l~IMlrlfflllil!~l .. nd Approval, and Shoreline Substantial Development Penmit for construction of a new pier (dock) to be located oTltilt<e'Wiisnirigfon. The pier would be associated with the Seahawks Headquarters and Training Facility. The west end of the pier would be 150 feet from the edge of Lake Washington, The pier would be 5 feet 10-1/2 inch wide, except for the east 30 feet of the pier, which would be 3 feet 10- 112 inches wide. The pier would replace an existing 6-foot wide, 123-foot long dock that would be removed, A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals ~ Environmental Health PubHc SeNices Energy! Natural Resources Ar~~~Fe~t 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of rlenton Department of Planning I Building I Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: fire- APPLICATION NO: LUA07-137, SM, ECF, SA-A APPLICANT: Alan Foltz PROJECT TITLE: Seahawks Practice Facility Pier SITE AREA: NIA LOCATION: 5015 Rlple Lane N COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 3, 2007 DATE CIRCULATED: NOVE~8 19, 2007 r-' ~~!,-, U PLAN REVIEW: Arneta Henninqer i BUILDING AREA (qross): NIA WORK ORDER NO: 77844 L u tlJUl SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested an Environmental Determination, Administratl~e-~rr.e,JTtatt ~S¥ieW and Approval, and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for construction of a new pier (dock) to-beJqcated on LakeV\1ashiogton. The' pier would be associated with the Seahawks Headquarters and Training Facility. The west end of the pier Wouldbs 150Je",t from the' edge of Lake Washington. The pier would be 5 feet 10-112 inch wide, except for the east 30 feet of the pier, which would be 3Te-et1~ 112 inches wide. The pier would replace an existing 6-foot wide, 123-foot long dock that would be removed. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Li htlG/are Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cuftura/ Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14.000 Feet / B. POLfCY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addilional informalion is needed I operlyasses this proposal. lib/a 7 I I Signature of Director or Authorized Repre Date • CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 19th day of November, 2007, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter, NOA, Environmental Checklist & PMT's documents. This information was sent to: Name Agencies See Attached Surrounding Property Owners See Attached Alan Foltz Contact/Applicant Football NW LLC Owner (Signature of Sender): >~ ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker Representing signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ",,\\\\1\1111 ,.::-'~ ,.YN,",; j..J ,!I" -<" ,rk,' Dated: 1\~al\-07 CL .::-</"; .' . : .,'[1, >'/I~ cO" .' ,,~ Project Name: Seahawks Practice Facility Pier Project Number: LUA07-137, SM, ECF, SA-A template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology' Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERG DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher' Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer Issaquah, WA 98027 39015 -172" Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 , WSDOT Northwest Region' Ouwamish Tribal Office 11 Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program' Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015172"' Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers' KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology & Historic Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer PO Box C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Boyd Powers 11 Depart of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72" Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6300 South center Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01 W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities State Department of Ecology Real Estate Services NW Regional Office Title Examiner 3190 160th Avenue SE 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. ' template -affidavit of service by mailing 334330288005 CROSETTO FRED A 5025 RIPLEY LN N RENTON WA 98056 292405900203 QUENDALL TERMINALS PO BOX 477 RENTON WA 98055 292405901508 PORT QUENDALL COMPANY C/O VULCAN INC 505 5TH AV S #900 SEATTLE WA 98104 334330300008 THOMAS DAVID L+SUZANNE E 5029 RIPLEY LN N RENTON WA 98056 292405901201 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 90868 BELLEVUE WA 98009 334330287502 WILLARD RICK+RENEE 5031 RIPLEY LN N RENTON WA 98056 07-137 ilil (l!iJ7 Sto...k·AJt"I\iI·~ NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPDSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: ~o\'enber '9.2007 LAND USE NUMBER' LUAJ7·Di, SM EU, SA-.4 PROJECT NAME: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ,~e af'plloant ha5 reqLestec an E.,vrronlr,Enta, De!ermi~~tror, Ad~\'rllstr~ll"~ Slt~ PIJn Rev,ew ~nd Apprcval, a"d Shomlln~ Scbstantial De'.elopment PEr~\lt lor :::onstruclron pf ~ new pre' Ido~k) te b8 located o~ L<lKe Washl~glan ThE< p,er '.".'Quld be assGGlated Wltr, the S~aha,",ks Headqu"rters and Tra'~lng F~~llltf. The ",est end af the pier ':,rould be ·50 teet from t:1e ad~€ of I ~ke 'Iliash,nglo,' Tire P'''' ,",oJld tB 5 feel 10·112 Inches Wide except lor tr,e east 30 leet of ere pre" "h,ch WOl.I~ oe " feet 10·' '2 '''COeS ,",'d~ Th~ pie, would rep'~~e ~n eXls:lng 6-loot wide, ~'23.foct long dock ti1,,1 wculc t;e rema,~d PROJECT LOCATION: ~015 Ripley Lane N OPTIONAL OETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (ONS_MI: As the Lead Agency', the City of Renton has determ,ned that s,gnlflcanl environmental Impacts are unlikel)" Ie resu:1 from the proposed prOject The,efore. as permItted u~der :he RCW 43 2' C 110 :he CII,.. of Renton IS ~s'ng the Optio~al DNS-M process t~ 9,ve ~atice tha: a DNS- M IS II~el .. te be Issued Comment ~er Cds lor the project and the proposed DNS-M are Integrated into a sil"gle commanl period, There Will be no comment perrod fallow,ng the ,ssuance cf Ihe Threshold Delerml~atron ~f Non_Sign ficance- Mlbg<lted (DNS·M). A 14·da,' appeal penoo WIll 'ollow Ihe Issuance ~f :he DNS·M PERMIT APPLICATION DATE' Ncverrber 15, 2007 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: Naverrber ',g, 2007 APPLICANTIPROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Alan Foltz, Waterfront Constrllction, Int ; Tel; (206) 548-':1800 P~rmitsJReview Rcqllestad: En~ironmQntal (SEPA) Review, Site Plan Review, Shoreline Substantial Oevelopment Permit Other Permits which may be required: NIA Requested StUdies: Stream and Lake Study Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW, Zor.lngILar.d Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate Ihe Proposed Projact: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: PlanninglBuildir.glPublic Works Oepartment. Development Services Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 96057 The subjecl site IS deSlgnaled CommerciallOfficeJResioenllal (COR) Or the City 01 Renton Comprehers,ve Land U,e Map and CommerciallOffieelReSldentlal (COR) on :he Ci:y s Zan "9 Map Environn'enla (SEPA: Checklist The project w I te subject 10 the City's SEPA ord,~anGe. Renton MU,llclpal Code 4·3-050. 'Critical Areas Regul~tlons" RMC 4-:)-090, "Shoreline r.laSler Program Regu,ations -RMC 4_g..Z00, "Sile Dsvelo;>r":1enl Plan Review." and otMer ~ppllc<lble local, Slate, and federal tode. and regulations as appropriate Proposed Mitigation Mea5ures: Mng~t an '\,1C<l5Ure, ,""llk~11' b" i,nrosec en tne propc5ed prCj8cI Th~B~ ,,.lcmmenced I~ hgatlon Measures ~~dress prOject Inpacts no'. ~~vererJ u/ ex'sl"'~ GOneS and regJ'~llons as cnec ~b~.e Thel mal Inc ude :he tolbN,ng Si~lng and spacing of pilings Width and length dimenSions Matenals Percentage 01 open decking Height above Ordinary High Water Mark Shoreline landscaping Comments on the above application must b~ submitted in writing to Elizabeth HIggins, Senior Planner, Developmer.1 Serilces DIvision, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 96057, by 5,:00 PM on December 3, 2007 If ,CLl ha',e qu€:ShOns aOo\l1 thiS P'cpos~1 (.r w,s, te b~ made a party ~f 'eGore ~rd ,'~celve adelt cna not hcatlo~ b1 rn~rI c.ol"tac: :he Prqect Manager AnIon .. '::ho 5Jbn·,ts wnlle, ~om"ents '",11 ~.J',n'r ~tlcal1~ become) P<lrty of fec~,d wlIi w,l be "mille.: ct <In)' de:'S!o'] 0" Ih" preJect CONTACT PERSON: Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner: Tel: (425) 430-7382; Eml: ehiggins@Ci.renton,wa.us PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If YOll would like tD be made a party of record to receive further information or. thiS proposed project. ~omp:ete this form and return to, City 01 Renton, Development Plannir.9, 1055 So Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 NameJFlle No Seahawks Practice FaCility PlerILUA07·137, SM, ECF SA-A NAME MAILING ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO CERTIFICATION DATE: J/-I"HJ] I, S'tiil-G""se:1? , hereby certify that "2 copies of the above document were posted by me in ~ conspicuous places or ~earby the described property on "'''\\\\\\\\\111 ... ,,,, \.-'iNN ~f(-\ 11" ~ ..... -., ... f0. .... ,,";'1''''' ':~.'I' SIGNED: :~'"'' .§" '''''.. ,/~ ---;7,.~CL::r~""f-,{----_"J!E'''1I. L,,;:i'~~,,,. ..... ,;:-.. 1-",-'1-.' :, -i~ -;; :;~ ,to-. ,;. . ". ~ ArrEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a NOlary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing ~ . ' ... f ~ , ~~.V :.-..-:~E (l,~~~~~~~~~~~V~!'l~~~'~C\ ,,<Off .... . ............. ()..:::- )H\I.\,,\\'.' ....... \~.;::- 'I F WAS' " ........ Ii\\\\\\\\,," • on the day of 'J)...u!..!dY'I/wy ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION & PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETEF\MINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE· MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJ~CT !'I~I;': ~ WlIlt'o\Iofth PROJECT NUMBER: l.UA07-1;l$, SA-H. ECF LOCATK)N: 0409 Whitworth AViinue S DESCRIPTION: A Mlory eonc!ol1'llnlum pro)Kt with IUflCi.tI=od ttrudured parking K[illSed from a public aINV.at the N;U of 1M ai!v. SixtH" condominium units with a dfil!llity of t1 dwlt!lin9 unils p4tr acre. Zoned Center Downtown wllltin Ihe Urban C4nter -OOWntown CompNhenaive Plan Iar>d U$e d8$ign.ti()fl, THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. ApjH!als of the en ... ironmen~1 ci9termln;ltiQn mu,. bt tlJeclln writing '\)/I or btokIre 5:00 PM on c.ctfl'liXIr 17, 2007. Appeals muat be 'iljld In wntlng togfihli!r willi 11M nqulred '75.00 application fee wltn: HNring Exam!ner, City of Renknl. itlS! South Grad)' Way, Renton, WA 980G7. AwNbl w thy EJlIml"Yr mil lJOVem~ by C~ of Renton rjlun1c:1p.a1 Code SKt\(IlI 4 .. 1j.41t1.B. ,f,ddllionallnfomtation ~in51 rn. appftll plOCHI may be obhinad frtlffi the 'WnW" City C'-'1!'". Office, (420) ~S10, A PUBLIC HEARING WilL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JANUARY 8, 2000 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSlDER THE SITE PLAN, IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOnCE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZA liON Plnse Include tile project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION ""\\\\\1111 I, ~&r.seiZ . ,hereby certify that ~ copi?s of the above doc~.~I--/(\i,I;~~111 posted by m ~ conspIcuoUS places or nearby the descnbed property on ;-J;'; " . .~ :..-:~ ''!' ,,~.\'"\'A<;. ,", ~ ~:::<i'" ,~ "" S · d ,"'" , ' _. -~ Igne : < ~ c <! ::: ~, '~'( ~Q.UI!I\..'CJ joE ''/ (~. J, .... ~ .;:' "= ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public. in and for the State ofWashingrIl111liil!.;;!l(1i9-",,,S£!)~ 11T"lf' \~i\\""" ....... ":(\,~ C .1. I -,..... L.. ~') O~'" o:Jedl ~ . on the "3t"G\ day of J.J~'QJ--1. . ...'_ NOTA Y Pl!BUt SlGNAlI NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: November 19, 2007 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA07-137, SM, ECF, SA-A PROJECT NAME: Sea hawks Practice Facility Pier PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has requested an Environmental Determination, Administrative Site Plan Review and Approval, and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for construction of a new pier (dock) to be located on Lake Washington. The pier would be associated with the Seahawks Headquarters and Training Facility. The west end of the pier would be 150 feet from the edge of Lake Washington. The pier would be 5 feet 10-1/2 inches wide, except for the east 30 feet of the pier, which would be 3 feet 10-112 inches wide. The pier would replace an existing 6-foot wide, 123-foot long dock that would be removed. PROJECT LOCATION: 5015 Ripley Lane N OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M): As Ihe Lead Agency, Ihe Cily of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.11 0, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There witt be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated (ONS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: November 15, 2007 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: November 19, 2007 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Alan Foltz, Waterfront Construction, Inc,; Tel: (206) 548·9800 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Site Plan Review, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Other Permits which may be required: N/A Requested Studies: Stream and Lake Study Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Department, Development Services Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 PUBLIC HEARING: NfA CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The subject site is designated Commercial/Office/Residential (COR) on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Commercial/Office/Residential (COR) on the City's Zoning Map Environmental {SEPAl Checklist The project witt be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, Renton Municlpal Code 4-3-050, "Critical Areas Regulations," RMC 4-3-090, "Shoreline Master Program Regulations," RMC4-9-200, "Site Development Plan Review," and other applicable local, state, and federal codes and regulations as appropriate Proposed Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measures will likely be Imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. They may include the following' Sizing and spacing of pilings • Width and length dimensions Materials Percentage of open decking • Height above Ordinary High Water Mark • Shoreline landscaping Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on December 3, 2007. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7382; Emf: ehiggins@ci.renton.wa.us I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renlon. Development Planning. 1055 So. Grady Way. Renton. WA 98057. NamefFile No.: Seahawks Practice Facility PierfLUA07-137. SM. ECF. SA-A NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: November 19,2007 Alan Foltz Waterfront Construction, Inc. 205 NE Northlake Way #230 Seattle, W A 98105 Subject: SeahawksPractice Facility Pier LUA07-137, SM, ECF, SA-A Dear Mr. Foltz: CIT' OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on December 10, 2007. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7382 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner cc: Football NW LLC / Owner ------------I-O-55-S-o-u-fu-G-rn-d-y-w-a-y---R-en-to-n~,W--~-hl-'n-gt-on--98-0-57~--------~-~' * This paperGQ!1tains 50% recycled material, 30%.pootCQnsumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE '~1 City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: r-a'T-P--{// ~$' .?it . A66ttfs: r~ F~ /'liP 7afr{ /'P//Y?~ CITY f'tf4'?7lF 1P,.,f ZIP: ~1'1t4f/?IJ9 PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: ~4rf'cTlr::r #////7/ fr~ . P~CT/ADDRES~S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: tJ/F ?4t r/cl/f'U/#pP gp.~p 8ac/P~P4 ?~C7?c! TELEPHON~UMBER: ;ltJ, -r/?/-/3'tf'.? APPLICANT (if other than owner) KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): ;Z,l';4 4tPp ?t7/? NAME:7'## ~tf't/,;t / /~,l~t9 EXISTING LAND USErS): /~#? COMr~C##;'t9 ?.!? PROPOSED LAND USErS): ?,,?,..bA""~~? ADDRESS: ?tfJr p/¥4?tfF pp?~#. //'l.rr~ EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: 1//"f',P~#' CoR, CITY: .Y ~r/p~ /<1,,1-ZIP9tf)t?~//7 ? PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ~ZESIGNATION (lfapp"c~"1VR~P N ~ TELEPH~UMBER ;4 ---~/Z/---#//? EXISTING ZONINGC--t' /f , CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): l/~aPP" NIt f- NAME:$-~ /&/7;Z #tf?'T F COMP~~ applicable): / /' / ~'/~PT 4~p/A't-e'17Pif1!;#C; ADDRESS: ;2tJy # -IPA7/Wn-~~ / /i//J7 X~. ;> F CITY:f/U$F Ct/1 'Pt?$ TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E·MAIL ADDRESS: ;ft!?t5 -~~-;.9"$~ SITE AREA (in square feet): 7;::z/ Y,Po 711 F-r- SQUARE FOOTAGE ~UBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: tv., SQUARE FOOTAGE:;:/:.0 TE ACCESS EASEMENTS: PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL ~ITY IN UNITS PERNET ACRE (if applicable): /1. , NUMBER OF PROPOSE#% applicable): NUMBER OF NEW DWE~aTS (if applicable): I Q:weblpw/devserv/formsiplaaniIlgimasterapp.doc 07n9l05 · .~.;~ ~ '" " .; 4, "7 PRt. :CT INFORMATION continL J ~-\' ... '/ NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UPl; applicable): PROJECTVALUE:~/at-? rtft? ,£12.- IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED R~WmAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): ,;0 ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDE~ BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): R ' SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NOrf~IDENTIAL o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS (if applicable): M o FLOOD HAZARD AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NOr(-R~NTIAL sq. ft. o GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (il applicable): o HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. NET FLOOR A~ NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): ~ P(SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES//lJ,jt sq. ft. NUMBER OF EriPLOYEES TO B).7UYED BY THE o WETLANDS sq. ft. NEW PROJECT (if applicable): , LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description ,on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE ;;/(/ QUARTER OF SECTION ~9,'TOWNSHIP;?"~ANG~..?.;lN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. J/!p4 /lFI///fFV" 3, y//,r fi?#~ A' FP/~ 2. ,f#(!U//d PP? 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) 61-l;:111'~$/#PJI')'" ~~~(please check one) _ the current owner of the property involved in this application or the a rized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of m'yno~~9J a~ b~. ~ ~ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ~?": &!@ , , . signed this instrument and ackno'/'ltedged illo be hisJher/their free and volunlary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. {Signature of Owner/Representative} (Signature of Owner/Representative) lIiotary Puhlk State of Washinl(ton GERALD C. PRIOR MY COMMISSION EXPIR:OS Q,webi wldevserR_IlJ,,;i,iw.li£lell.pp.doc Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) My appointment exp;res:_I:..D'--'-I_,_s--'-I"-,_Cl ___ _ 2 07n9l05 Co-mp'~~n~·; F!)olbaIJ "'l'triht,".,~o;f (.U_~ ·--l------\\~,·:~ '~J~~ ::;-!~. (~::~::::j;~~,~::~. ;~~~-------l CfJmp;my Addn~,.~ ilnd f;~( NlIlllh(·,·; SQS Fif!h AV(!fHtt SOllth '-"-r ~~~-;:~i~(. rr;';~:-j~:i-;~r··A(ldl·;~_;:Hld F;~~\lllll1b('r: ----··1 20~ NE. ~oliM:lIie \\'lIy,Suit{~:UO Snih> f)f)O St'ntilt'", \V:\ Y~IO..t.-Jn9 r:ax: (206)342-JO(1O COIlIp.,ny Cont.trt f'c"1 ~()tl N~H))C: Tunl Chrado E:1l13H; jt}m(q.;C"hj:td()llc.t~om Phollt': 206 :=;50 ~J(~J iJ("!ljel'i ;"-ili.n.e: Pr;lclkc L)dli~y Bfl'at OO-L'f.i. S('.H1!i:. W.·" 1}:{105-6IH6 ·"----··scp,i~-·i~·~;.~:i,k-r-c_:;;i;t;ct-p~-i:;;;~~ N:.nne: H;1,vt" TyfOl' Email: d:l\.t.l!..";.l-rcrf£tn!((.onHnlol::tiol1.t.om rhnn~~: !O6 S48 98/)1) \ '--"'-". SO\\' EfTt~{:n\,~ lhte: -til/in VbSI~;r S(>TYic(·" Agn;'l'J1H.'"lJt E{f{"dive ih!l.': .UI:'fl7 Tlli .. S~I!~'::-r;l~n! of \.\\-,!'k :--t~I~nbcr ! nllis' S(j\'.:"-) i$ {'nlo::r;:d intc. a.,,; ,)j' :he SO\V Effc:::~i\'e f);:,~~ <.JJ'ld 1~ o,;.u'.'l'n1<:({ b~.; ilk iC:I;!'o~ '.if tho.: ~l;.'!s.{f:, S(~r.,:i,:c~ Agr~~.::n!(";11 rc(..:r:~'!1c~',f :lbn~·t' (11',..: "\-I.'-;/,'} r,.'r'-n:::: I)'i~d heri:,in ;,nd r\()! d..:-llrH'd "','ill Ii:.\'t' Ef;{; m-(:,llling ~;ct fonh in Ifa; .\·IS"A. 111 Ih· .~':<:fI! ,:J ;cr!Y c(;,!llk~ Ixm"_~(:ll jjli~ ::.10\\/ ~nd tk." r.-c:t'tW' I)(fh~~ ;'<.·1SA, the: ;crrn.:=; of .. h· ;,,15;\ wiH !";I'l\'~~m t)(.~C"~ iVtlH1'1 f)f S"n;i(:L-j, S lJeH".t'r;lbks. Sen' itt' f~ ")'.-),k;f "'dB j)r'(J', id,~ Ih~· kl1o',ving S"C'fyicc;; :wJ ii.ll"i1i:-::n ,1\,:, ;"(11Iowrn~; DdivU;1blc.;: P1: &\1..'-J)' r.tDJ,' F f(~:J.\!Etl.T.L\..cU.:1..!?L::;.l.( j [J.5~.f~ ~:J{:E~'? S(!1. .,.)U~ Pr;J."\:ld('f ",.ifl 'Ipply f~)r :lII.:1l.,brJ in (pcr:din~. jtlri"di(:";"',J:1! ilppn:;\'.'li '.\:hid} lS "u t {:.{ 1.11\.: .. liy(:(f c(;ntrol n{ .sen' II.:(' Pro'/!ck(1 fll,":': fp,~~~~::.say po:::nni!$ j()r !h,' dod ':oll:,lruClwt, prn.jed. lhc-;.,c lTli('/ m~;I;)tjt;· Dc~]artm',:rrt ~}f Et'ology, SI,h~t~lntial Desclupln,~nl, Stl')rdiJtc 1~.x(.,npt"I<.._Ht. S[P/\., fhlddwg [)cnmi, f\Ony COl'fli 1'( r.~'llghl(:t"f." Permit ~llhJ J.1C:-PMtHlCIlI \If F i:::b .1I!d W ildhf.:.:. V<~ri:!1l(c, C,)tld:irior},!1 u~c ('I" (Irlt.::r ~p{]':I;d pccmito;. t~lay nh,) be r.~quin~d. .S{:rvt\~e l'fO',idel will jl1\)'d,!< UK I;omph:t(! d.:lfHng, ,k::.ign ,.t!H1 '::Oti-;rnU',!{lil dl)(;ij!tH::n1.'> fOr tl)n$lnr.;rj"~l d' ~he jlTi)f"',F'(7lt dock. Dl'!'i~_ns ,\ri!! he :lpprll\'<.."l..1 by {·;:m·"f':lIlY . .'\ b;l5i(~ l.h::Pii~.;il !)f :!-;.~,OO(l.fH) i~ rt:qHI!t~l Ie· b;:g~ll tnt.: P.:;rmi( j'!r()'::'l(~cm~=l! S,;rvi(;..; Oi;'JI~!!~:~ wilt bt Jeuuc'i.;:-d fr(~rn dq.H)sii :1,. lJlo.:y ~1r': In(tHTC"<..i. 1\pI~mpli;tk 1,\'55.T. '.nJI1.\c ;td.lo.-tl:" :,:.Idl jnv0il·~. it i5. ~,!,(,bilbk Ihar the \\.'raJ '.'(l:?1 !"tIl ()b!;lIl,i!ilg pnm'I!~' 'NI}! ':!"t:;c{:,<1 yODr J.":p(J:-.i1. .~\I\ !;GUr.:: !(~ -~(~ bllkd nl r;;I.('$ ;!cfi.l..::d t>clt)~~, V'}.'1/.l.:rfrullt C;:;fll'.l.fI.lcti':'n_ lnc. ,J,~,e,. nN p()t:'idl"' ""IJi··· ... ':':' -;"';I·'.'i,·\:~ ,H,d til !!l5U[(; ;[CC">lf:.tCY ". ~;IJrVev m,1Y ;.1',: rC\(iIJICd "I !hl~ c"!i[,f:t·~ '::~p'::W',::. ,\ ~"'ll~')['!k{c rj~)p,c~t~1 :;lJl"'ii.;.y r:1;:IY l.'i': fUll;1F"d I(f :-,\.tPI"kr~le!li the p{'rrr;l! "p"plk~liol1 I'<;{t'un{;;n,~nh. Cll~'iL..l,J~!~~T...r\NJJ.yg(>J;.LS)il(J:::i{\L-,).t.K},JDr:s I( dUling Ih<..: <:G~.lr~o: or pnJ<..:uring pcrInrb i; h .Jell ;r1HF,cd lili!l SIII'U<rn! EII:;!ini.!"l.'ring. :':0ils Eng~rn~ .. :·rtn2' ninlogtt'3! {·Otl:i,dling._ S!}:~(;i:111r"!sp,'("{i'~'rl-" ,~I' C(lll~:H[EII(:. S,.T,·i~·~':; .!fl-rc.qr;irc-!i. In.:: C1i<'~tj ,;.i'::llIly.:: I"(:-:.p;)n~~ibk h,lf ~)I;;!~I;::li;I~~\d~l~,\~::,:~'~~l~':J~~li:~~~[~;~~~'(:1~:ri::J',~:~;\~;I~';~~:~~~t('lIt ('l')n;;!pi' lil>ll. ;'Jo:, win bc bilk-d ;j[ COST ,i, W.S.~ '1' .. IN A-rU{f'IU",iNT CU;-":STHU(:n\J\;. INC L}()[S NOT ~.t!\l;<: L-\(N 1;I~Or-T.:SS!ONAL UA nfL ITY (ER ~.nRS S ()\IISS!t.)01S) INSUR/"Nc:r:. rUE CUt~T :"·P.\' ClIO()S!~ .. \T niETH EXP[.NSl~ .. ro HIRE A f'ROFESS10~"::;\L C(Jt"StLLi.NT )"() R.F·,VH-:I.V IJI~,\\'.-'fj\iCjS ,\~ /IPPi..!C"\lWN FOT~\1.') i'RfOR TO PERidll \ •• :)i<.-c-s ::.rty ri~~hl r(; rai_\i:-ji:.nml 1)(,n ~'(}II\'[!f/i<'lJs al';e-rnelj I ;h~H King COUBty. V(iishingt(H~ is nOi tht: pmlJ<::r VCIHJ,,'-. r~. St-~rC'ntbHity. If an;.-pwvfsloH Iff Ih!~ 1\!;I'('"C1i1l~nt i;: held hy::r. courr of Cntllpcknr jmi:>di~tit);110 he ilh~j;.aL im':--rliJ M 1H1t-nt(lf(:t:Jblc. (i-, such pmvi.siflll will l~("_'-d¢emtd tlmtnded Ie} ;lc:hi~vc -;-tS n('";)rly as p(,~o;.ibk lilt ;;;-lril'~ ....... :onolni-c effect 8"; INe ,~righ\{!J pr.)vi:;iolt, :md (ii) tne r.::g;~iiry, ·,';)tldiIY <inti (:nfon:cahility (~r rhe (cm'liJ'rit!g rft)Vi:>~0n$ of this .. \grL'emell~ \vil! 111)1 be ;;:HCCkd N impain~u there-hy. I~J. rnj1l!lc!ivt'-Rl.'"lief ro-r Bn:·at:h. SCtVfl:C PrlJvidl'r'~ ohligations tmdcI' ihis Agr(:c'tnt"lll art of :l IInique cbar.'!(;!cr Ih~~t g.iv!.":$-lheJ-H p"rticular Vjlllle. S<:rvi.:-c pro\'i{rcr'~ Or.;:'aci) of any M ~IS oolig,Hions will fe-SHit in irrep;'ll";l-bk ;111J t;tJFltinuing Ifamage rn Coll'1P,wy t()r ".:o,ilich fhere \ .... iH be no m:lequaJe n!ml!lty ill law. In [h£' otven; c.f :>.rtch vr¢,-!(;h, COIllP:IIt}' will b;; f::lllitkd II) injuncl.iv-c Tdji~f<md/dr;:' duree ff)t 3p?dtk l-'l-e-rf(lrmanC"t: . .:mJ .'>u.:-h other an~i funl\er t¢lkf <"IS mJy be-p-roper il\dudfn~ lw[ nOllimikd 10 monetary {bm~'e-e~. COMi'AN\': Waterfront Construction, Inc. 205 NE Northlake Way SUite 230 Seattle, WA 98105 Dave Tylor Vp Operations (206) 548-9800 Fax (206) 548-1022 Toll Free (888) 827-7784 dave@watertrontconstruction.com 2n. !'I.! oti(-e$, .'\gr\.~~ment ',-."ill be /\H f10H<':c$ .cipril'",d lll~d'.'r this 1_lwvidcrJ in ·.w~ijng :md will J:k: (::.:ms;ti.:'r.:d rc("~~iYcd if d.diven.'d nr ~e;H by pcrs.:.m .. ll ddi'o"C"ry, r<:pu!able ::~)'..ln~c j';l.;s.irnik. In lJ,.'rh certified a-fld n:r;UI:H' n-wit it) tht C1JtH'K.t peLion J()i' e~1d~ pi-Jrly a~ Hs{(·-d OIl the applr"::;,lhk 501,1/, :mJ. ill rhe. C;t~·c .)f ~'-"_lIflr;H\Y. \V~{h j) copy ,n "I~.:vr :Hld C:;cn;:-rai C")!.JI1~;-I~ at \I!{'" 5ame fjdd!"c$~. [ilh(;r px--ly mr,y i:h;l.lit'e-its ~,)j)f~fcl pcr:i(>[l f;)r J~C}tict;;: by p:ci',:idifig lh~ 1.1lhe1" p<>.rty written nDll.co:' (\fH)e,~,!mc. SEn.VICE f'ROVWEf-(: \l,-'akdi-om C\in::;tnK~tion. i-n;;:-, .") / ,/ ~ ,- 1 itle: l-(.-/ . .,~ ___ , ___ . ____ . ______________ ~. Waterfront Construction, Inc. 205 NE Northlake Way Suite 230 Seattle, WA 98105 Alan Foltz Permit Coordinator (206) 548-9800 Fax (206) 548-1022 Totl Free (888) 827-7784 foltz@watefirontconstruction.com STR 29/40~i TAXLOT 15 "R",>TEK PARCEL NORTH" REN';'ON Le;A-OQ-04, LL}\, C{EC NO 20010105900005 WCH IS POR OF SW 1/4 29-24-05 LY WLY 01' BN RR CO R/W information compiledfrom various sources. Rea! Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranTies as 10 (he accuracy or completeness o/m/armarian contained in {his report. ~ King County~ By law this information may not be used for commercial purposes. Assessor Real Property Records: Taxpayer PORT QUENDALL Parcel Number COMPANY Account Number Tax Year 2007 Levy Code Tax Status TAXABLE Taxable Value Reason Appraised Land Value $7,829,100 Taxable Land Value 2924059015 292405901508 2151 NONE OR UNKNOWN $7,829,100 Appraised Improvement $1,000 Taxable Improvement Value $1,000 Value Assessor Property Sales Records: Tip: Use the R~.9rd~.rs Office: Excise T"x Affida.vitli.ReRo!! to see more sales records details Sale Date 5115/2000 ISaie Price Seller Name J. H. BAXTER & CO Buyer Name PORT QUENDALL COMPANY Sale Date 8/31/1994 ISaie Price Seller Name J H BAXTER &CO INC Buyer Name J H BAXTER AND CO LTD Assessor Parcel Records: District Name RENTON Property Name PORT QUENDAll Property Type Plat Name Present Use Plat Block Water System Plat Lot Sewer System Lot Area 721,580 SqFt (16.57 acres) Access Sectionrrownship/Range SW29245 Street Surface Assessor Legal Description Records: Account Number 292405901508 \ Record JNumber 1 $6,500,000 1$0 COMMERCIAL Industrial (Heavy) WATER DISTRICT PUBLIC PUBLIC NONE OR UNKNOWN J01 -02 http://www5.metrokc.gov/reports/property Jeport.asp?PIN=2924059015 SI1 nO()7 29240515 "BAXTER PARCEL NORTH" RENTON LUA-OO- Legal Description 044 LLA REC NO 20010105900005 WCH IS POR OF SW 1/4 29-24-05 L Y WL Y OF BN RR CO RIW Assessor Commercial Building Records: Address LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD 98056 Building Number 1 Building Quality AVERAGE Number of Buildings 1 Building Description OFFICE Year Built 1963 Construction Class WOOD FRAME Gross SqFt 1273 Shape Rect or Slightlrreg Net SqFt 1273 Sprinklers Stories 1 Elevators Heating System ELECTRIC WALL Predominant Use OFFICE BUILDING (344) Building Number 2 Building Quality AVERAGE Number of Buildings 1 Building Description BOAT SHELTER Year Built 1961 Construction Class WOOD FRAME Gross SqFt 1248 Shape Rect or Slight Irreg Net SqFt 1248 Sprinklers Stories 1 Elevators Heating System NO HEAT Predominant Use GARAGE, STORAGE (326) This report was generated: 5/1/2007 3:49:58 PM Related on-line reports: King c_ounty GIS: Property information FAa I<ing CO,~!l ty, As"es_sor:~ubmitjl_l"j!quesH9 cQrf!!,!'Uhi!t iDf9.IrnlltiQI! DOES: Permit AI!I!licatiQns.Bej:!ort King Countv: Districts and D!!velopment Conditions Report King County Assessor: eR!)al ProI!erty Report (PDF format requires Acrobat) King County 6ssessor: Quarter Section Map Report (PDF format require-". Acrobilll KLng County IreasuJ:VQperations: property T;lx Information Recorders Offi.Q.ELEJtcise Tax A.ffi<fityils RE'ROr! Recorders Office: Scanned images of plats, surveys, and other map documents Enter a 10 digit Parcel Number: or Enter an address: http://www5,metrokc.gov/reports/property Jeport.asp?PIN=292 4059015 51112007 King (WA) *k***************************************w*********wk*~****************************'**** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * OWNF:RSH: P iNFORMATION Parcel Number :292405 9015 08 Q:SW Building Id # : 1 Parcel Type :Unplatted Owner/TaxpayeI :Port Quendall Company CoOwner Site Address:Lake Washington Blvd Renton Mail Address:505 5th Ave S #900 Seattle Wa 98104 Telephone :Owner: S:29 SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Recording Date Audi tors Fee # : 05119/2000 :896 Multi-parcel :$6,500,000 Full :Warranty Loan Amount Lender Loan Type Interest Rate T:24N Sale Price Deed Type % Owned :100 Vesting Type:Corporation ===================~========== ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFOfu~TION =-=-"'================C-Co=========== Taxable Land :$7,829,100 % Improved Taxable Structure :$1,000 2006 Taxes :$102,617.32 Taxable Total :$7,830,100 Exempt Code Appr'd Land :$7,829,100 Excise Tax #:1754029 Appr'd Structure :$1,000 Levy Code :2101 Appr'd Totdl :$7,830,100 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Census :Tract: Block: Map Grld :626 Dl Neighborhd Cd :075070 ·Zoning Code : COR Land Use :245 Ind,Heavy Industr_al l.egal :STR 292405 TAXLOT 15 "BAXTER :PARCEL NORTH" RENTON LUA-00-044 :LLA REC NO 20010105900005 WCH IS Sub/Plat Recording Num Short Plat Building Name Volume : Port Quenda 11 Jurisdctn :RENTON Page: Profile-Page 1 of 2 * , * * , R:05=: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **************************************~****************************************~******** information compdedjmm VQnous sources_ Reo! ESlale Solutions makes no representations or warranries as 10 the occuracy or compiereness oj informal/on contained in Ihis report King (WA) *************************-****************************"'.*****************y************ ., * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Parcel #:2J2~05 9015 R~dg Id #:1 * Bedrooms Bath Full: Bath 3/4 Bath 1/2 Fireplace: Deck Porch Stories : 1 Units Elevator Mobile Home No Nuisance Easements: Design Type LAND INFORMATION Lot Acres:16.57 Lot SqFt :721,580 Lot Shape:Restricted Tde/Uplnd:Both TopoProbs; Sprinkler: Wtr Front: WtrFrntSF:940 Golf Adj : No PROPERTY CHARACTERIS~ICS 1st Floor Sf': 2nd Floor Sf': 3+ Floor SqFt Half noar SF Year Built :1963 Eff Year :1963 GarageType Bsmnt Type BsmntGrade Bldg Matl:Woad Frame Illdg Condo Bldg Grade :Avg %Brick/Stone: HeatSource AboveGroundSF Finished SqFt Fin Bsmnt SF; UnfinBsrnnt SF BsmntTotal Sf' Bsmnt Park SF Building SqFt Deck SqFt :1,273 Heat Type:Elec Wall AttachedGrgSF VIEW INFORMATION Wtr Source :Water District Sewer Type :Public STREET INFORMATION * * * * * * * * * * * * View :None St Surface * View Seattle Skyline View Lake/River View Lk Sammamish View Mountain View Puget Sound View Mt Rainier View Olympics View Cascades View Lake Washington View Other St Access: Public * * * * * * Profile-Page 2 of 2 * * , * * * * * * * * * * * ~*******************************************************'*****************************'* In/ormation compdedfrom various sources. Rea/ Estate SOIUlions makes no represenrat/Ons or warranlies as to Ihe accuracy or completeness o/m/ormation contained in thIS report. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVIf' WAI\..:;;R OF SUBMITTAL REQuIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Irrigation Plan 4 . Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 i . Master Application Form 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section PROJECT NAME: /cf:,,:.:...irt tJ t::&-/];:V17 CL DATE c -7/Z&/c,:r-' _ I' J • o ?ftc. P(~ ~I~ YfJ;; o ?~~"-<--f..eA~ o ~"vl·V-M ~ 12if,uu , .' : .. ~, "'v':"' ,VELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2 AND 3 Photosimulations 2 AND 3 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section lku:{;c'.£ .fi1ULffY f'Wr TI-f1:V7~ ~ -rue:- P!2--E-Af'P L--l C-AT I Co N L:vMMB.-NT? DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: Construction Services, Economic Development, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner Neil Watts, Development Services Division Director ~ -. New Preliminary Application: ~k' lt~ ~ :::if 212.10 s-tj/}/j-lJx/-( PREAPP NO. __ 1'-C--'-!2B'--'--6_1-<-._O_g\_0 _________ _ A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for 'bcltl::a..v 1i!::l , Thursday, at if: 0 0 ~AM 0 PM, in one of the 6th floor conference rooms. If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11 :00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. Plan Reviewer assigned is ArneJzc-= . Please submit your written comments to _....;tt"--'-·-'-{1.JL __ ~-'-->..-___ (planner) at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. P J-. j,.. .fl/ "fr'''' QI2 tId? A "' ("J-'~....v. ~u,/J::rJ.-i' I ,. /) f1-e 1./ (7,.,...,' " (;) i V ...... v --~ . (l'1/'-fl~~ H:lDivision.slDevelop.serlDev & Plan.inglTemplatelPreapp2 Revised 1-05 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: October 2, 2007 Elizabeth Higgins Ameta Henninger X7298 SEAHA WKS PRACTICE FACILITY DOCK PREAPPLICATION PRE 07-086 LAKE WASHINGTON I have completed my review on the Facility Dock application located in Section 29, Township 24N, Range 5 E and have the following comments. WATER: o This project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. o There are no existing waterrnains on this west side of the parcel. SANITARY SEWER: o There are no City of Renton sanitary sewer mains existing in the location of the proposed dock. The applicant needs to coordinate with the King County Wastewater Division for locates prior to and during construction around the Mercer Island Force Main. o Applicant needs to verify if there is to be any plumbing out to the dock. STORM DRAINAGE: o There are no storm drainage facilities at the location of the dock site. Applicant is reminded to comply with outside agencies such as Department of Fisheries and JARPA. GENERAL: o All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. • All civil engmeering plans shall be tied into a minimum of two of the City of Renton current Horizontal and Vertical Control network. • Permit application must include an itemIzed cost estimate for these improvements. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. cc: Kayren K WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION. INC. 205 NE NORTHLAKE WAY, SUITE 230 SEATTLE, WA 98105 -'·-1'; PROJECT NARRATIVE ". :' Project: Land Use Permits Required: Zoning: Proposed Activity: Estimated Construction Cost: Construction Access: BE Comments: Alan D. Foltz Permit Coordinator Football Northwest Replacement Dock Section SW, Township 24N, Range 05E LAT: 47.537N LON: 122.20W Waterbody: Lake Washington, County: King Parcel: 292405 9015 08 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and SEP A Review COR / 245 Ind, Heavy Industry A new pier will be constructed to replace an existing pier. The existing wooden float pier is 123 ft. long by 6 ft wide, held in position by 12" wood piling; all to be removed for disposal at an approved upland facility. A new pier at a more suitable site location will be constructed with full grating, for nominal widths of4' and 5', by 150' long. Deck surface, 2'-6" above OHW. Eighteen support piling of 6" dia. steel piles will position structure a minimum of 18" above OHW. See Permit Drawings. $ 102,500.00. All proposed construction is at shoreline and waterward of Ordinary High Water (OHW). Delivery of materials, equipment and personnel to be by contractor's barge. No land access necessary for construction. Existing pier removal and all waste materials to be stored on construction barge for ultimate disposal at an approved upland disposal site. Please review attached BE comments for further details. Note: The existing boathouse remains. No activities are proposed For the boathouse with this application for the new replacement pier structure. Waterfront Construction, Inc. Agent for Football Northwest LLC Seattle (2DBJ 548-9800 Toll Free [BBBl 827-7784 Fax (206) 548-1022 Football Northwest -Replacement Dock Renton, Washington 1. Proposed Activity Biological Evaluation A new pier will be constructed to replace an existing pier. The existing wooden float pier is 123- teet long and approximately 6 teet wide. It is held in place by six 12-inch wooden piling. The floats, piling, and miscellaneous debris will be removed from Lake Washington for disposal. A new pier with open grate decking will be constructed approximately 21O-feet south of the existing pier on the same property. The new pier will vary in width from 3' -10.5" to 5'-10.5" and will be ISO-feet long. The extra length is needed to reach lake depths suitable for vessels expected at this location. The deck surface will be supported a minimum of 2' -6" above the water surface (at ordinary high water [OHW]) by eighteen 6-inch epoxy-coated steel piles. Deck support structure will be a minimum of IS-inches above the water surface at OI-lW. 2. Drawings: An aerial photo showing the project vicinity is provided in Appendix A. Photos of the existing floating dock and lake shore are provided in Appendix B. Construction drawings are provided in Appendix C 3. Date: August 23, 2007 4. Applicant: Football Northwest, LLC Attn: Elaine Wine 505 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98104 5. Agent: Cedarock Consultants, Inc. Attn: Carl Hadley 19609 2441h Avenue NE Woodinville, Washington 98077 6. Project Name: Football Northwest Replacement Dock 7. Location of Activity Section: SWv. Sec 29 Township: 24N Latitude: 47.537N Longitude: 122.20W Waterbody: Lake Washington HUC: 171100120302 8. Description of Work Range: 05E County: King A construction barge with all required materials, equipment, and pre-fabricated sections of the new dock will be brought to the site. The barge would likely set spuds for stability. Spuds are long steel poles attached to the barge which are lowered to the lakebed and locked in place to stabilize the platform. They are typically used when heavy loads are transferred by crane to prevent excessive movement. Care will be taken to insure the barge does not ground out on the lake bottom at any time during the construction project. August 23, 2007 CEDAROCK CONSUIJANTS. INC. Fool/JuIl1Iiorlhwe.l/ /Ji;' AugllX! 23, 200 :.do(' Page I Football Northwest -Replacement Dock Renton, Washington Biological Evaluation The existing floating dock will be lifted onto the barge with the barge-based crane and stored on the barge for subsequent off-site disposal at an approved upland disposal site. The crane will be fitted with a vibratory insertion/extraction system and will rcmove the existing 12-inch diameter timber piling and dolphin, which will also be stored on the barge for off-site disposal. Vibratory hammers operate not by impact, but by vibrating and pulling the pile from its seat in the sediments. If extraction is not possible, or a pile breaks, it will be cut off below the mud line and covered with clean sand. Shoreline enhancement, to include plantings and removal of scrap lumber that has collected in the lake, will be completed to restore the area where the dock was located. The barge will then be re-positioned for construction of the new pier approximately 210-feet south of the existing pier. This location was selected to take advantage of a public trail near the shoreline at this location. Fifteen new 6-inch diameter epoxy-coated steel piling, and 3 new 6- inch diameter epoxy-coated steel batter piling will be driven to refusal using the vibratory hammer. The steel piling will be cut to final elevation and fitted with prefabricated pile cap saddle assemblies. The cap beam assemblies will then be installed, leveled, and welded to the pile cap assemblies. The pre-fabricated fully grated pier sections will be placed onto the cap beam assemblies and fastened with through bolts. Miscellaneous hardware such as corner brackets and remaining deck grating will then be installed to complete the pier. 9. Operations A. General description of activities at the site: Removal of the existing dock and construction of the new dock take place over a period of three to four weeks. Major tasks will consist of approximately one day to deliver and anchor the barge; two to four days to pull the old piles and remove the old dock; three to five days to drive piles for the new dock; 10 to 12 days to install the new dock; and one day to clean-up and remove the barge. The completed dock will be used by staff at the Seahawks' headquarters and may periodically be used to ferry the public in from remote parking locations during summer training camp. The dock is designed as a day use facility. No permanent storage, maintenance or washing of vessels will be allowed. No lighting of the dock is proposed. B. Marine traffic: The completed dock will generate some additional boat tramc. It is expected that during peak use in August (during training) approximately 50 trips per day could occur. This would drop to an average of around 20 trips per day during non-training periods of the summer, and to almost nothing during late fall, winter and spring. C. Equipment used: Equipment used in the construction of the dock wi II consist of a barge mounted crane, vibratory insertion/extraction system, and miscellaneous small power driven equipment including compressors, generators, drills, welders, and hand tools. A small powerboat may be on-site for safety, spill prevention, and to help direct work. August 23, 2007 }Coo/hall Nor/h'1'('sllli:: AlIjill.\"/ 23. 20() ~_dlJ( CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS. INC Page 2 Football Northwest -Replacement Dock Renton, Washington Biological Evaluation D. Work area: The work area consists ofa portion of nearshore Lake Washington approximately 200 feet long and 200-feet wide. The lake in this area ranges from 2-feet up to about IS-feet deep. The immediate shoreline currently has no vegetation with the exception of a few alder. F. Staging areas and equipment wash outs: Most staging will take place on the barge. Some equipment may be stored on the adjacent uplands in previollsly developed areas if there is room. G. Running of equipment during work: Mechanical equipment is generally limited to the crane, small power equipment, and hand tools running during normal daylight work hours. H. Storm water controls / management: The new dock is entirely located on Lake Washington and consists of open grating. No terrestrial work is needed to accommodate the dock. No storm water controls are necessary. I. Location of any material disposal: Material disposal will occur in approved upland locations away from the site. 10. Action Area The action area reviewed for potential impacts to listed species includes the project work area described above and Lake Washington within one mile of the site. 11. Species Information: Information gathered from eXlstmg literature and trom the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), and Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) databases indicates six federally protected species may be present within the Action Area (Table I). I~e Chinook salmon Bull trout Dolly Varden Steelhead Coho salmon Pink salmon Table 1 Species of Concern Scientific Name Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Salvelinus confluentus Salvelinus malma Oncorhynchus mykiss Oncorhynchus kisutch Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Federal Status Threatened, EFH • Threatened Proposed Threatened Threatened EFH EFH Essential F1Sh Habitat deSignated by the PaCific Flshenes Management Council August 23, 2007 "im/hull Norlhll'/!.I'I m:' AuglHI 23, 2(}(F doc CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC Page 3 WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION, INC, 205 NE NORTHLAKE WAY, SUITE 230 SEATTLE, WA 9B1 05 :_".' _'" . :.;"n-C: . : \' ' N.O ' j , ""'l(-y I ~~ Ll.'U CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION Proposed Construction Dates: dod Days and Hours of Operation: Hauling and Transportation: Barge Cranes: Alan D, Foltz Permit Coordinator Waterfront Construction, Inc. Agent for Football Northwest LLC Seattle (206) 548-9800 Construction to be scheduled as permit work windows allow, projected within the window of 7-16 to 7-31 for In Water pile work, restricted by the Corps of Engineers and WDFW. Above Ordinary High Water work will not be restricted by a designated work window, thus the new pier, pre-fabricated at the contractor's upland facility, can be installed after the 7-31 st window closure as applicable. Operation time frames to be within those hours stipulated as applicable within Municipal permits and codes. Delivery of materials, equipment and persOlmel to be by contractor's barge. No land access necessary for construction. Existing pier removal and all waste materials to be stored on construction barge for ultimate disposal at an approved upland disposal site. Construction barge cranes fitted with vibratory driver/extraction systems to be used for removal of existing piling and pier floats, placement of new pier piling, and placement of new pier decking. All activities from construction barge. No tower cranes are involved with the proposed work. Toll Free (BBBl 827-7784 Fax (206) 548-1 022 WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION, INC. 205 NE NORTHLAKE WAY, SUITE 230 SEATTLE, WA 98105 Applicant: Football Northwest Address: County: Lake Washington Boulevard, Renton, W A 98056 King Proj. Description: A new pier will be constructed to replace an existing pier. The existing wooden float pier is 123 ft. long by 6 ft wide, held in position by 12" wood piling; all to be removed for disposal at an approved upland facility. A new pier at a more suitable site location will be constructed with full grating, for nominal widths of 4' and 5', by 150' long. Deck surface, 2' -6" above OHW. Eighteen support piling of 6" dia. steel piles will position structure a minimum of 18 Construction Sequence I. Mobilize construction barge and moor at tlie site with al~ required materials and equipment taking care to insure the barge does not ground out on the lake bottom at any time during the construction project. 2. With the barge based crane, remove the existing float pier, stock piling materials on the construction barge for subsequent off site disposal at an approved upland disposal site. 3. Using the barge based crane fitted with a vibratoI)' insertion/extraction system, remove the existing 12" dia. timber piling and dolphin, stock piling on the barge for off site disposal. Note: If extraction is not possible, the piling will be cut off below the mud line, capped with PVC membrane and covered with clean sand. 4. Re-position barge [or construction of tbe proposed pier in new location. 5. Drive 18 new 6" diameter Epoxy coated steel piling at 10,000 pounds to practical refusal for pier construction. Cut steel piling to elevation. 6. Install prefabricated pile cap saddle assemblies. 7. Install, level, and \veld cap beam assemblies to pile cap assemblies. 8. Place pre-fabricated fully grated pier sections onto the cap beam assemblies and fasten with through bolts. 9. Install comer brackets and remaining deck grating. 10. Shoreline enhancement plantings to be done by others. ATTENTION: If at any time; as a result of project activities, fish are observed in distress, a fish kill occurs, or water quality problems develop (including equipment leaks or spills), operations shall cease and the WDFW at (360) 534-8233 and Washington Department of Ecology at (425) 649-7000 shall be contacted immediately. Work shall not resume until further approval is given by the WDFW. General Notes I. All steel brackets and assemblies to be fabricated off site at fabricator's Kirkland facility. See fabrication packet for details. 2. All pier sections will be prefabricated at the contractor's Lake Union facility. MATERIAL SPECIFICA nONS ~ Glu Lams 3-1/8 x 18" OF ACZA (Chemonite) Joist 2" x 6"OF #2 OR BETTER ACZA (Chemonite) Rim Joist 2"x 6" OF #2 OR BETTER ACZA (Chemonite) Nailer 2" x 4"OF #2 OR BETTER ACZA (Chemonite) Ledqer 3" x 4" OF #2 OR BETTER ACZA (Chemonite) Grating Molded Plastic (Thru-Flow) None Hardware Steel Galvanized I I I I Seattle (206) 548-8800 Toll Free (8BBl 827-7784 Fax (206) 548-1 022 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: " The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable Significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For non project actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. \\Server02\D\Permits Department\Lettersl.Al's Ltr's\Football NW\envchlst.doc06/21/07 , . A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: ;of''/ t!1,4/ t-,A/W ,-o/#"/f' 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 1 O. 11 . Name of applicant: Date checklist prepared: V-P/f" -< F; :l'I/';7 Agency requesting checklist: /" j C///P/';fp:,.p~ w~ List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. //t?~p1t?/t;#J-r~,t//4';r/6'?.-P tfi?;--cr..p-4';/pc-/f- CY Rync: ~/? f/ t;?~.t ~#~/ff Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. ,Ptf}~g "x-/Jc?#/ List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. hv#/'?//¢'? -A'fo;t:>p/y ICtJFW -#/4 (f(/{(!i/tamPls(!l!crifttrrf;;YOUr proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. IIEA;?I/;;; E-r/?;!;/#-,rh?ff /J'M 1/'/,t/,C0' ;f ff)'?~/~ #-1#77,a;::-// tf-;£ 1#/$ ~c31?-" //~ /P Al'8/eY t-t9C ~T./P,.(/... ,#.t?47;#"PYK /Z/..$.,p- d'eT4/,L/~ \\Server02\D\Permits Department\Letters\Al's Ltr's\Football NW\envchlst.doc 2 12. B. 1. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s}. Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. {/4:7 r c 'r ? kJ ;? 9 ~ ""',.(/ t? ? r /-I/CF,!-;2;; -Z 4-.?,F ,j"C/r '-'4 r .L7 -J';;l.-/ 4-£..9~ /:?;:L-// r3 ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one~ rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . b. What is th~st slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for exampl ,,::a:LY+'C~"" <::._~. muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, speci prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. ,P tf',I!/ $ .-r.R c/v>-P e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. ~ f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. ~tJT 4/ 7/'':::/ /.-f'//~ g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project constructio;;;/cAi;;~uildingS}~ h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: /0#,7" / '#P/ft?y#?/ \\Server02\D\Permits Department\leUerslAl's Ltr's\Football NW\envchlst.doc 3 " 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any,),en.eraIl Y describe and, give approximate quantities if known. P/fr#? !!-.Y~J'ff #P'#:' /f!e''';Y/, #V?;V,f'7,c'/ C"4,Pt'f tf TJ/? .::?R.t/, b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. /f/ t?,;f/ c /r,A/ t91R P c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. WATER O{;.:--~F Ft1?//// //h!!-~r ~'p"'Y4'~ ,,</6F##,,{J, a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 14/rE WA ~/}'G7o'/c/ 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. (V(ff'_ //;rPY" 4;r~#PLJ 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. ~4 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. /t? 5) Does the proposal lie within a 1 DO-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. /p'r /"P(f/W"e/ 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and antiCipated volume of discharge. ;R'c:7 \\Server02\D\Permits Oepartment\Letters\AI's Ltr's\Football NW\envchlst.doc 4 b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. ft& 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be seNed (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to seNe. * c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. ~CJT 4r;pc:rp;/, /e#- 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. ~CJ d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: ,# ~/ cr /1'/.1' /t?~ 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: + deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other -K. evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other b. -X-shrubs __ grass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? ;VV# #~,77~t7 /$/7$/ 4//;;I/?/~6-~ ;V;;-~ 'pt~,#~ ~///k#?¥~F'?1;f-;{~P'/AY.t; Ust threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. ? c. ~ ,#~Z;-/"Pt?C#~ d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preseNe or enhance vegeta~;;e/~/»#-/~ \\Server02\D\Permits Department\Lettersl.Al's Ltr's\Football NW\envchlst.doc 5 .' . 5. ANIMALS a. b. c. d. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known 10 be on or near Ihe sile: (~awk. heron¥.#=-=4r ______ _ ~:~deer, bear, el~;''';ill;~;; ,< Fz~rout, herring, shellfish, other _____ _ List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. 7f.t-ht?~ Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain ~ C/ /;: /J cPa¢' 7'/' ,If P, f/l Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, ma~ng,etc .7;;//.1/.#/ if;-C47'#~/,,#J/lf/'f/P' ~~,F-. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: #tf7#F /~/f/t?Y?{/ 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. 1) 2) Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. /t? Describe speci.a. I emergency services that might be required. -r-L F4-Jf~tJy.,$t5y 7;7//· t· /tld'--~ /t¥7??J C(I//~ P#~ij Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Rtl~/~#~ \\Server02\D\Permits Department\Letters\A1's Ltr's\Football NW\envchlst.doc 6 .' . b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? ,# cP/'"tr /flf'y 4~/cY?7 #;7..7'#r 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. y J/~T ff4# 11/~~ ,p/F#,7?~ 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: A'6'#c ~ P/~;;;p,p 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? C''p8/PMtJHc y/t:?;// ;P/4?/R'~.?/~¥ <t M~/~/7Y b, Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe . .PO c. d. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CC,1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? ,#t?r k p c?tr7 ~ g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. 5"/;/ C1,,{!~;'/# E .-;7'''',4 i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? ~ \\Server02\D\Permits Department\Letters\AI's Ltr's\Football NW\envchlst.doc 7 · . j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? ~/4 ~Oet/f k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: /V t:?~C:: / /PC! /J.tJ~ I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: ~t9~tF '//~~t:?7~P 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. propos~es to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. //1£4.' ;l //tf/~d/JlJ'~ .?dff~ ~/V r b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: .RP?/#" /',#c?/~~ 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? ,,# tl/ f b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? ~C7 4Pf/tfY/4#/ \\Server02\D\Permits Oepartment\Lettersl.Al's Ltr's\Football NW\envchlst.doc 8 " . , c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: /l/t7tPS-$//t?7~/ 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? /...-1;4-F///f ~~pt;;- b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. ~tl c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: ._h7~ u'_ /lI6W //r"l F##.d#c-e-..> /i' !£:-4'~~//Pf ~~?~"...- de:: // 1//,/7#':7. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. ~O b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. ~ c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. j4I"F~/#/P'?/p" #~~~ b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? ~t?/ ~.-o~ c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? %f \\ServerD2\D\Permits Department\Letters\AI's Ur's\Football NW\envchlst.doc 9 • .' , . , ~ d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur, ~ g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: ~p?n //'l~t7~P 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. /tJ b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. ~t1/tr /~t:P '#c?/tf?~ 16. UTILITIES a. Circle[j!ll!!ies currently available at the site: electrici¥?natural gas, ~flise ~ervic~~ ~anitary se~septic system, other. /'- b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. A/cP'P'Z; /AI~/~ C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, Proponent: Name Printed: Date: \\Server02\o\Permits DepartmennLetters\AI's Ltr's\Football NW\envchlst.doc 10 GDi\ROCl< COf\J5ULT/-'J'JTS, [p\-,irOl1iTtCnta! C.ollSGititl9 STREAM AND LAKE STUDY DOCK REPLACEMENT Renton, Washington Prepared for: Football Northwest, LLC 505 Fifth Ave South, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98104 Prepared by: Cedarock Consultants, Inc. 19609 244th A venue NE Woodinville, Washington 98077 October 2, 2007 J 9609244(0 /\VENUE Nt~· WQOO!NVILLE, WA 98077 . P:-l2S/788·0961 . F:42S/788-S562 Football NW, LLC -Dock Replacement Renlon, Wa.shington TABLE OF CONTENTS Stream and Lake Study Page 1.0 PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 PROJECT LOCATION ........................................................................................................ 1 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................. 1 3.1 Description of Proposed Action .................................................................................... 1 3.2 Alternatives Analysis ................................................................................................... .3 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... 3 4.1 Lake Washington Physical Habitat Condition ............................................................. .3 4.2 Ecological Functions ..................................................................................................... 5 4.3 Fish Use ........................................................................................................................ 8 4.4 Wildlife Use .................................................................................................................. 8 5.0 MITIGATION ........................................................................................................................ 9 5.1 Pier Design .................................................................................................................... 9 5.2 Old Pier and Debris Removal ..................................................................................... l0 6.0 RESOURCE VALUES TO BE RESTORED, CREATED, OR ENHANCED .............. 10 6.1 Habitat Improvement Opportunity .............................................................................. 10 6.2 Function and Value Comparison ................................................................................ 11 6.3 Summary ..................................................................................................................... 12 7.0 COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES ............................................................. 12 8.0 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE ........................................................................................ 12 9.0 SITE PROTECTION AND MAINTENANCE ................................................................. 13 1 0.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................... 14 LIST OF FIGURES Figure I. Vicinity Map ..................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2. Existing Lake Washington shoreline looking south from the existing dock .................... 4 Figure 3. Existing dock and piling in Lake Washington to be removed ......................................... .5 APPENDICES Appendix 1 -Plan Set and Site Map Appendix 2 -Planting Plan for Seahawks Headqnarters Project October 2. 2007 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS. INC. SeahawkslDock Lakes Srreams Swdy /0020ldoc Page i Football NW, LLe -Dock Replacement Renton, Washinglon 1.0 PURPOSE Stream and Lake Study A new pier will be constructed to replace an existing pier. The existing wooden float pier is 123- feet long and approximately 6 feet wide. It is held in place by six 12-inch wooden piling. The floats, piling, and miscellaneous debris will be removed from Lake Washington for disposal. A new pier with open grate decking will be constructed approximately 21O-feet south of the existing pier on the same property (Appendix I). The new pier will vary in width from 3'-10.5" to 5'-10.5" and will be I 50-feet long. The extra length is needed to reach lake depths suitable for vessels expected at this location. The deck surface will be supported a minimum of 2' -6" above the water surface (at ordinary high water [OHW]) by eighteen 6-inch epoxy-coated steel piles. Deck support structure will be a minimum of 18-inches above the water surface at OHW. The completed dock will be used by staff at the Seahawks' headquarters and may periodically be used to ferry the public in from remote locations during summer training camp. The dock is designed as a day use facility. No permanent storage, maintenance or washing of vessels will be allowed. No artificial lighting is proposed. The proposed action triggers the need for a Standard Streams and Lakes Study under requirements of the Renton Municipal Code (RMC) because the site contains a waterbody and proposes changes to that waterbody. Requirements for the studies provided in this report are described in RMC 4-8-120(D). 2.0 PROJECT LOCATION The proposed project is located at the northwest comer of the Seahawks Headquarters and Training Facility at 5015 Lake Washington Boulevard North, adjacent to Lake Washington in the City of Renton, King County (Figure I). 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 Description of Proposed Action A construction barge with all required materials, equipment, and pre-fabricated sections of the new dock will be brought to the site. The barge would likely set spuds for stability. Spuds are long steel poles attached to the barge which are lowered to the lakebed and locked in place to stabilize the platform. They are typically used when heavy loads are transferred by crane to prevent excessive movement. Care will be taken to insure the barge does not ground out on the lake bottom at any time during the construction project. October 2. 2007 SeahawkslDock Lakes Streams Study l00207.doc CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS. INC Page I Football NW, LLC -Dock Replacement Hen1on, Washington PROJECT SITE "Vn /{ !f.<;iru:;t<Jrf Figure I. Vicinity Map Stream and Lake Study The existing floating dock will be lifted onto the barge with the barge-based crane and stored on the barge for subsequent off-site disposal at an approved upland disposal site. The crane will be fitted with a vibratory insertion/extraction system and will remove the existing 12-inch diameter timber piling, which will also be stored on the barge for ofT-site disposal. Vibratory hammers operate not by impact, but by vibrating and pulling the pile from its seat in the sediments. If extraction is not possible, or a pile breaks, it will be cut off below the mud line. Shoreline enhancement to include plantings and removal of scrap lumber that has collected in the lake will be completed to restore the arca where the dock was located. The barge will then be re-positioned for construction of the new pier approximately 210-feet south of the existing pier. This location was selected to take advantage of a public trail near the shoreline at this location. Fifteen new 6-inch diameter epoxy-coated steel piling, and 3 new 6- inch diameter epoxy-coated steel batter piling will be driven to refusal using the vibratory hammer (Appendix I). The steel piling will be cut to final elevation and fitted with prefabricated pile cap saddle assemblies. The cap beam assemblies will then be installed, leveled, and welded to the pile cap assemblies. The pre-fabricated fully grated pier sections will be placed onto the cap beam assemblies and fastened with through bolts. Miscellaneous hardware such as comer brackets and remaining deck grating will then be installed to complete the pier. October 2. 2007 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS. INC. Seahawk<fIDock Lakes Streams Study JO0207.doc Page 2 Football NW, LLe -Dock Replacement Renton, JYashington Strewn and Lake Study Included within this document is a description of the mitigation measures utilized for this project (Section 5), Mitigation consists almost entirely of removal of the existing dock and replacement with a more fish-friendly version meeting state and federal design guidelines for minimizing impacts to fisheries, A description of the plan is provided in Section 5. The functions and values comparison analysis is provided in Section 6. The Site Map required under RMC 4-8-120(D)(19)(a) is attached (Appendix I). 3.2 Alternatives Analysis Several alternative project layouts were evaluated to avoid and mlmmlze impacts to Lake Washington. These included: • Looking at several locations for the new dock. • Evaluating alternative sizes and configurations for the new dock. The proposed alternative was selected as it meets the needs of the applicant and minimizes potential impacts to the Lake. This conclusion is based on the following rationale: • The dock location puts the expected increase in boat activity at the furthest possible location from the condominiums to the north consistent with the public trail to be provided as part of the Seahawks Headquarters project. • The location allows minimal disturbance to the Lake Washington shoreline planting plan developed as part of the Seahawks Headquarters project. • The dock is the minimum width and length required to reach the depths needed for expected vessel traffic consistent with the preferred location discussed above. 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS This section provides a description of existing habitat conditions along the Lake Washington shoreline area in the vicinity of the proposed project. Known fish and wildlife uses are also described. 4.1 Lake Washington Physical Habitat Condition Physical surveys of the Lake Washington shoreline in the vicinity of the project were completed in 2000 to characterize existing conditions related to fish habitat (AESI 2000). The majority of the bank (56%) was unsupported by manmade structures and consisted of steep dirt banks from one to four feet high (30%), or relatively low gradient "beach" like shoreline (26%). Manmade structures and protection features (rip-rap, log bollards, piers, buildings, log skids) cover 33 percent of the shoreline. Eleven percent of the bank could not be surveyed due to heavy blackberry coverage. Four percent of the bank (110 feet) is undercut by wave action. Large logs floating or sitting on the lake bottom near the shore protect 81 percent of the shoreline. These logs not only shelter the banks from wave action, they provide good quality rearing and shelter habitat for fish and macro invertebrates. October 2,2007 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC. SeahawkslDock Lakes Streams Study J00207.doc Page 3 Football jVW, LLe -Dock Replacement Renton, ~Vashington Stream and Lake Study Up until a few months ago, Lake Washington shoreline vegetation within the work area was dominated by a narrOW line of Himalayan blackberry, Scotch broom, red alder, black cottonwood, and various willow species which grew up to water's edge. As part of the Seahawks Headquarters Project, non-native vegetation along the shoreline was cleared and the shoreline is currently being protected by water quality protection measures (Figure 2). A planting plan will be implemented by the Headquarters Project team as soon as construction in the area is complete (Appendix 2). The planting plan will enhance the shoreline with forb, shrub and tree canopy layers consisting entirely of native species. The planting plan was reviewed and approved by the City of Renton, and the Washington State Departments of Ecology (Ecology) and Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). In general, upland and aquatic habitat value of the site is low due to the disturbed nature of the former industrial areas. The shoreline areas provide the highest habitat value in the project area, but the habitat value of these areas are currently limited due to the lack of vegetative diversity and structure, and lack of special habitat features such as snags. figure 2. Existing Lake Washington shoreline looking south from the existing dock. Dimensional lumber and trash will be removed from the lake. The existing wooden float pier is I 23-feet long and approximately 6 feet wide (Figure 3). The deck is made of timber and plywood set on floating logs. Some of the logs have partially sunk and the doek rests on the lake bed in places. The structure is held in place by six 12-inch wooden piling. October 2. 2007 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS. INC. Seahawks/Dock l.akes Sfreams Study l00207.doc Page 4 Football ,"nv, !.LC -Dock Replacf!ment Renton, 11lashinglOn Stream and Lake Study Figure 3. Existing dock and piling in Lake Washington to be removed. 4.2 Ecological Functions Ecological functions for the areas impacted by the proposed action are described below along with a description of existing conditions for each function. Water Quality Vegetation adjacent to streams and lakes can improve water quality by filtering pollutants, removing nutrients, and preventing sediment introduction. Native planted areas of approximately I 00 feet in width are normally required to preserve riparian water quality function where natural routing of water through buffers is preserved and relied upon for water quality protection. However, source control and water quality best management practices are recognized as more important for urban settings where stormwater runoff is not reliant on riparian conditions for treatment before discharge. In this area, water quality treatment function is provided by the proposed Seahawks' Headquarters development and not by the riparian area. Water quality function of the existing on-site riparian area is poor. Under existing conditions, virtually no vegetation is present adjacent to Lake Washington (Figure 3). There are also steep slopes adjacent to the Lake so normal water quality treatment process is virtually absent. Surface water runs directly across the narrow riparian areas and receives very little natural treatment. This will improve when the riparian area is replanted following construction of the Seahawks site. The proposed dock replacement will not interfere with the planting plan. October 2. 2007 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC. SeahawkslDock Lakes Streams SllIdy l00207.doc Page 5 Football NW, Lie -Dock Replacement Renton, Washington • Siream and Lake Study Use of the future dock will not increase upland vehicular traffic and may decrease traffic slightly as staff and players use boats to commute to the site. Boat use in the area should increase but this will not be the result of the replacement dock, but rather the change in land use of the adjoining land. Organic Material Overhanging vegetation contributes leaves, vegetative litter, and small woody debris directly to the channeL This material forms the source of food for aquatic invertebrates, which are in turn eaten by fish. Terrestrial insects, another food source, also utilize riparian vegetation as habitat. The majority of material comes from directly over the stream. Function diminishes rapidly after about 25 feet from channels edge though some benefit is still realized up to about 50 feet away. Under existing conditions, vegetation adjacent to Lake Washington is virtually absent. The volume of leaf litter is minor as is the contribution of woody debris. Because the overall shoreline area lacks diversity, the nutrient contribution and value as insect habitat is poor. Overall, the value of the existing riparian vegetation is low relative to its ability to contribute food and nutrients. As described above, riparian value will improve when the shoreline is replanted following construction of the Seahawks site. The proposed dock replacement will not interfere with the planting plan. Microclimate Riparian vegetation protects streams from climate changes caused by widespread development away from the stream, including soil and air temperature, humidity, and wind. There is no direct link between microclimate and the condition of salmonid habitat, however, it has been suggested that microclimate needs protection to maintain desirable assemblages of plants and animal species, including insects, beneficial to fish. It is estimated that a riparian zone between approximately 58 and 345 feet in the Renton area is necessary to entirely preserve natural mature forest riparian microclimates. The lack of any significant vegetation adjacent to Lake Washington provides almost no microclimate function under existing conditions. The proposed dock replacement will not interfere with the future planting plan which will increase the microclimate benefits described above. Temperature & Shade Overhanging vegetation shades streams, until the channels become so broad that, like Lake Washington, most of the water surface is exposed to the sun. By intercepting solar radiation, vegetation prevents heat energy from reaching streams, maintaining cooler water. Vegetation also shades soil, cooling water introduced to streams through the hyporheic zone. Cool water is an essential habitat feature for salmon ids, and increases the amount of atmospheric oxygen that will dissolve into the water, which also improves salmon habitat conditions and is essential for salmon spawning. October 2, 2007 SeahawkslDock Lakes Streams Study J00207.doc CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC Page 6 Football NW, LLe -Dock Replacement Renton, Washington Stream and Lake Study Under existing conditions, there is virtually no riparian shade cast over the Lake from the Seahawks property. This will improve with the future planting plan. However, riparian and dock coverage shading of Lake Washington has no effect on water temperature due to the large size of the lake. Thus, the dock can have no effect on this habitat characteristic. Human Access Control One function of protected riparian zones in populated watersheds can be reducing the direct encroachment of humans including refuse dumping, trampling of vegetation, bank erosion, and noise. These function most effectively when the adjacent land use consists of low intensity development; when the riparian areas are greater than 50 feet wide and planted with high quality mixed species of native vegetation that discourages entry; and where there was a high degree of resident education on the value of the protected riparian zones. Human access control to the Lake Washington shoreline is encouraged by the City of Renton and will be provided in the future by a public walkway along the shoreline. Access to the dock will be prevented by fence with a locked gate. Access to the shoreline will not change with construction of the dock. Large Woody Debris Large woody debris (L WD) consists of downed tree stems and branches and is a functionally important structural component of stream channels in the Pacific Northwest. In non-fish-bearing stream channels such as on this project property, L WD acts as a surface for biological activity which contributes to the productivity of a stream system. In a mature coniferous forest, the majority (70 to 90 percent) ofL WD in a stream comes from within 50 feet of the stream. The Lake Washington shoreline contains an abundant supply of L WD that has washed up over the years. The logs come mainly from old timber log booms and escapement from milling operations rather than recruitment from along the shoreline. However, the existing shoreline on the property contains no trees large enough to provide L WD recruitment for scores of years. This will not change with the proposed dock. Bank Stability Roots from vegetation growing along the stream bank help stabilize soils and reduce erosion. Root strength benefits are normally low beyond 40 feet from the channel. The Lake Washington shoreline is slowly eroding due in part to the lack of stabilizing vegetation. Other factors such as the changing lake levels (winter and summer) managed by the Army Corps, boat wakes, and the relatively young shoreline (due to lowering of the Lake Washington water level in 1917) also influence erosion rates. Removal of the existing dock will subject a small area of the shoreline to increased wave action and potential for erosion. The proposed planting plan will help stabilize the shoreline in this area and over time the erosion rate should decrease to match the adjoining shoreline. Installation of the new dock will decrease erosion potential over the small area (approximately 6 feet) in the where piles will attenuate wave action. October 2, 2007 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS. INC. SeahawkslDock Lakes Streams Study J00107.doc Page 7 Football NW, LLe -Dock Replacement Renton, Washington Fish Migration Stream and Lake Study The dock has been designed to meet WDFW and NMFS recommendations for new docks with respect to minimizing impacts on migrating fish, Adult salmon migrate further offshore and would not be affected by the dock. However, juvenile salmonids migrate along the shoreline and may be cautious of overhead structures and piles due to their use by potential predators. Agencies generally recommend an elevated structure with minimal pile use and dock width near shore wherever possible. To meet these guidelines, the proposed structure will be a minimum of 18-inches above the water (at high lake level), will be only four feet wide within 30 feet of the shore, and will have no piles within 18-feet of shore. In addition, the deck will be fully grated to allow sunlight to pass through the structure and minimize potential predator habitat. The dock design will be reviewed by WDFW as part of the hydraulic project approval process and fully meets their requirements. Wildlife Habitat The cleared and graded property provides little wildlife habitat though the area immediately adjacent to Lake Washington has moderate value due in part to the proximity of the lake (see Section 4.4). The lack of a mature native canopy limits nesting and foraging habitat for most specIes. 4.3 Fish Use Lake Washington supports a variety of anadromous salmonids, including Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), coho (0 kisutch), and sockeye salmon (0 nerka), and steelhead (0 mykiss) and cutthroat trout (0 clarki). Runs ofnon-anadromous kokanee (0 nerka) salmon are also present (King County 1993) and the occasional bull trout (Salvelinus conjluentus) has been observed (WDFW 1998a, WDFW 1998b, King County 2000). Lake Washington contains a wide variety of non-salmonid species, some of which are considered "warm water" species. These include both native and non-native species such as speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus), three-spine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus), northern squawfish (Ptychocheilus oregonensis), yellow perch (Perea jlavescens), black crappie (Pomoxis nigromaculatus), largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieui), mountain whitefish (Prosopium williamsoni), largescale sucker (Catostomus macrocheilus), longfin smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys), and prickly sculpin (Coitus as per) among other species (Pfeifer and Weinheimer 1992, King County 1993, Wydoski and Whitney, 1979). 4.4 Wildlife Use Canada geese (Branta canadensis) were observed in both the vegetated and hardscape shoreline areas. The geese were observed nesting along the vegetated shoreline and in the osprey (Pandion haliaetus) nest located near the PSE substation nesting platform. Puget Sound Energy moved an osprey nest from a retired distribution pole on the Baxter site to a new nest pole platform erected on the south side of the substation in 1993. Puget Sound Energy also placed a crossbar on top of the first transmission pole leading away from the station to provide a safe place for the birds to perch. The osprey successfully nested on the new platform from 1993 until 1997 when the osprey built a new nest at the top of the wood chip elevator located on the Barbee Mill site to the south of the property. This nest was eliminated when the mill was tom down a few years ago but October 2. 2007 SeahawkslDock Lakes Streams Study }00207.doc CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC Page 8 rootball NW, LLC -Dock Replacement Renton, Washington Stream and Lake Study a new platform was built further south just offshore of the mouth of May Creek. The osprey continue to return to the area and successfully breed (http://www.appart.com/ospreyl). Osprey are present in the area from mid-March through August. Osprey have been observed hunting small mammals (likely mice) on the North Baxter site as well as fishing the lake. Canada geese and bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucophalus) have occasionally been observed perching on the nest platform during the winter months. It is assumed the bald eagles used the perch site to forage for fish and waterfowl along the lake shoreline. Three bald eagle nest sites have been historically reported between 0.8 and 0.9 miles west and northwest of the site on Mercer Island (WDFW 2006). Two of the nest sites are not known to have been used for the last several years. The third nest was reported active in 2006. Beaver (Castor canadensis) have been observed in wetland habitat along the lake shoreline and in Gypsy Subbasin Drainage east of the site. Pond sliders (Pseudemys scripta) have been observed on floating logs. Red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) were observed using cattail habitat in the project vicinity. Snipe (Capella gallinago) were observed in the cottonwood sapling-dominated areas. Other species of passerine birds and amphibians could be supported along the shoreline and the narrow red alder-dominated upland shoreline area. Numerous duck species also use the offshore area adjacent to the site. 5.0 MITIGATION Project actions that will affect aquatic features and adjacent shoreline vegetation include: 1) Removal of the existing dock and support piles, 2) Clean-up of manmade debris from the shoreline, 3) Installation of the new dock and support piles, 4) Replanting of all affected areas of the shoreline. Mitigation for the project will consist primarily of impact avoidance and minimization actions. This will include implementation of pier design recommendations as necessary to achieve no- net-loss of productive capacity of aquatic habitat. Compensatory mitigation will include removal of the existing pier, associated pile, and debris that has accumulated along the shoreline. The shoreline will be planted as part of the adjacent Seahawks Headquarters project and no credit for planting is expected for the pier replacement project. No maintenance or monitoring is necessary for this project. 5.1 Pier Design The new pier has been designed to meet the following guidelines recommended by the WDFW, NMFS and Ecology: • Locate structures above ordinary high water to minimize effects on the shoreline and allow maximum light penetration -The new dock will be located a minimum of 18- inches above the OHW of the lake. • Use environmentally sensitive dock materials -No treated wood products will be used below OHW_ Piles will consist of epoxy-coated steel pile (with no coal tar ingredients) of the minimum size necessary to support the structure. October 2. 2007 SeahawkslDock Lakes Streams Study J00207.doc CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC Page 9 Foo/bali NW, Ll"C -Dock Replacement Renton, Washington Stream and Lake Study • Minimize overhead and inwater structure in the nearshore environment -The structure will be the minimum length necessary to reach water depths required for boats expected to use the dock. The dock width will not exceed six feet in the loading and unloading areas and will be only four feet wide within 30 feet of the shore. No piles will be placed within IS-feet of shore. • Minimize overwater coverage and shading -The deck will be fully grated to allow sunlight to pass through the structure and minimize potential predator habitat. Steel- grated decking will pass 60 percent of the natural light to the lake environment below. • Construction timing -Inwater work in the south end of Lake Washington is limited by the Corps of Engineers to two short work windows: November 16 to December 31; and July 16 to July 31. The proposed project will be constructed within one of these windows or as otherwise allowed or restricted by permitting authorities. 5.2 Old Pier and Debris Removal The applicant will remove the existing floating dock and all associated piles prior to commencement of construction on the new dock. The floats, piling, and miscellaneous debris along the shoreline will be removed from Lake Washington for disposal in an approved upland location. 6.0 RESOURCE AND FUNCTIONAL VALUES TO BE RESTORED, CREATED, OR ENHANCED Aquatic and wildlife habitat on the site consist of a Class 1 lake and associated riparian zones. These features have been heavily impacted by the long history of industrial land use and associated contamination at the site. The Lake Washington shoreline riparian planting plan developed for the adjacent Seahawks Headquarters Project focuses on restoring habitat function to the degraded area (Appendix 2). The proposed dock replacement project will remove an existing floating dock from the lake and replace it with a more environmentally sensitive structure. Ecological functions described in Section 4.2 will benefit minimally from this action. 6.1 Habitat Improvement Opportunity The proposed action will remove an existing floating dock from the lake and replace it with a more environmentally sensitive structure. The project will not disturb or remove any significant functional benefit of the shoreline as the existing condition provides minimal value but is planned for future improvements under a separate action. The net change provided by the project along the shoreline will be a small increase in habitat value for fish due primarily to removal of the existing dock. The proposed action will not change the total area of existing trees and shrubs within lOO-feet of water's edge and will create much higher aquatic habitat quality by removing a partially sunken dock which may provide predator habitat and replacing it with a structure meeting all environmental protection requirements for new docks. October 2,2007 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS. INC. SeahawkslDock Lakes Streams Study J 00207.doc Page 10 Football NW, LLe -Dock Replacement Renton, Washington 6.2 Function and Value Comparison Stream and J.ake Study This section provides a description of functions and values to be provided under the proposed project action and compares each function to the existing condition described in Section 4.2. Function and value determinations are based on best available science as described in A.C. Kindig & Co and Cedarock Consultants, Inc. (2003). Water Quality Some minor and temporary impacts to water quality will occur during construction when the six existing wooden piles are removed and the 18 new steel pile are installed. New pile installation will meet guidelines required by WDFW to minimize temporary and long term impacts of piles. It is not known whether or not any treated wood is present in the existing structure. An examination of the old pier did not identify and creosote or other treated wood on the above water sections of the structure. Food The proposed action will have no effect on the riparian planting plan proposed for the Lake Washington shoreline. Thus, the new pier is not expected to have any affect on food production in the lake. Mi croci imate Microclimate is a big picture climate control issue extending for up to many hundreds of feet from the lake. The proposed action will have no effect on microclimate. Temperature and Shade The proposed action will have no effect on the riparian planting plan proposed for the Lake Washington shoreline. Thus, the pier is not expected to have any affect on shade or water temperature in the lake. Human Access Control The proposed action will not affect human access to the shoreline environment. The new private dock will replace and existing private dock. Large Woody Debris The proposed action will have no effect on the riparian planting plan proposed for the Lake Washington shoreline. Thus, the pier is not expected to have any affect on large woody debris recruitment. Channel Migration Channel migration zones are not associated with large managed lakes. The proposal will have no effect on channel migration. October 2, 2007 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC. SeahawksiDock Lakes Streams Study J00207.doc Page II Football NW, LIC -Dock Replacement Renton, Washing/on Bank Stability Stream and Lake Study The immediate shoreline will remain relatively unchanged. The existing dock is connected to the shore with a simple boardwalk to a low gradient area of the shoreline. The boardwalk will be removed and the shoreline replanted. The new dock will connect to the shore above OHW in an area that currently has no vegetation. Wildlife Habitat The proposed action will have no effect on the riparian planting plan proposed for the Lake Washington shoreline and will not create or reduce wildlife nesting, perching, or roosting habitat. Thus, overall wildlife habitat is expected to remain unchanged by the proposed action. Wetland There are no wetlands or wetland buffers within more than 100 feet of the proposed action. 6.3 Summary Value for all habitat functions under the proposed dock replacement is expected to be equal to or slightly greater than under existing conditions. This is primarily due to the existing lack of vegetation along the shoreline, and replacement of the partially sunken dock with a structure meeting all environmental protection requirements for new docks. 7.0 COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES Discussions with the Army Corps began in September 2007 with submittal of the JARP A. It is expected the Corps will issue a 404 Permit after ESA Section 7 review by NMFS and the USFWS. The WDFW will be contacted to apply for Hydraulic Project Approval. The DNR will be contacted as necessary to arrange any aquatic lands permits. This Lakes and Streams Report is a requirement of the City of Renton under its Critical Areas Ordinance for the new pier. Renton must issue a Shoreline Substantial Development permit, perform SEPA review, and issue building permits for construction of the dock. This Lakes and Streams Report is required to assess impacts and riparian functions and values for alterations to the Lake Washington Shoreline, and includes functional impacts and mitigation for the shoreline alteration. 8.0 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE Construction is expected to begin in July 2008. Inwater work will be complete within one to two weeks and all work will be complete within three to four weeks. October 2, 2007 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS. INC. SeahawksiDock Lakes Streams Study 100Z07.doc Page 12 Foothal! NW, LLC, Dock Replacement Renton, Washington Stream and Lake Study 9.0 SITE PROTECTION AND MAINTENANCE No existing trees will be affected by the proposed action. No riparian plantings are proposed as part of this action. A riparian planting, monitoring, and maintenance plan was prepared and approved as part of the Seahawks Headquarters Project (Appendix 2). Future plantings will include the areas of both the existing and future docks. No additional site protection or maintanence is necessary. October 2, 2007 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS. INC. SeahawkslDock Lakes Streams Study ]00207.doc Page 13 Football NW, LLe -Dock Replacement Renton, Washington 10.0 REFERENCES Stream and Lake Study A.c. Kindig & Co and Cedarock Consultants, Inc. 2003. Best available science literature review and stream buffer recommendations. Consultant report prepared for the City of Renton. February 27,2003. Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI). 2000. Quendall and Baxter Properties Mitigation Analysis Memorandum. February 17,2000. Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. 2000. An Addendum to the Quendall and Baxter Properties Mitigation Analysis Memorandum dated February 17, 2000. J.H. Baxter Propety Mitigation Analysis Memorandum. October 2, 2000. King County. 1993. Sammamish River corridor conditions and enhancement opportunities. King County Surface Water Management, Seattle, WA. 54 p. plus appendices. King County. 2000. Literature review and recommended sampling protocol for bull trout in King County. Seattle, Washington. 42 p. Pfeifer, B. and J. Weinheimer. 1992. Fisheries investigations of Lakes Washington and Sammamish, 1980-1990. VI Wanmwater fish in Lakes Washington and Sammamish (draft report). Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA. Washington State Department ofFish and Wildlife (WDFW). 1998a. State of Washington bull trout/Dolly Varden stock status. Map prepared by Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife HabitatlLands. September 1998. Washington State Department ofFish and Wildlife (WDFW). 1998b. Washington State salmonid stock inventory, bull trout/Dolly Varden. July 1998. Olympia, Washington. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 2006. Priority habitats and species database search (T24N, R05E, S29). August 18, 2006. Olympia, Washington. Wydoski, R.S. and R.R. Whitney. 1979. Inland fishes of Washington. University of Washington Press, Seattle, W A. 220 p. October 1. 2007 CEDAROCK CONSUJ.TANTS, INC. SeahawkslDock Lakes Streams Study l00207.doc Page 14 Football NW, LLC -Dock Replacement Renton, Washingtun APPENDIX! PLAN SET and SITE MAP October 2. 2007 SeahawksiDock Lakes Streams Study /00207.doc Project Designed by Waterfront Construction, Inc. Stream and Lake Study CEDAROCK CONSULTAfffS. INC. Faotball NW, LtC -Dock Replacement Renton, Washington ii i! II II PRDJE[;T C£51GNED EJr'; I, " , 205 NE hJl')RTHl)J(E WAI(, 'SulL! 230 StAntE. WA. 9&105 (:WIG) s.4-a-98OQ " " :1 'I I ii II Ii Ii !I II I: II ii II " I I II II 11 II " " Ii !j I, I' II !I :1 II 11 il I] " Ii 11 II t1 " !j '! II ~::: ?.~ ,,: '::,0;: .';LilJ.:or '-"<E WASHINGTON VICINITY MAP/NO LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1/4 SEc:; SW :19-2..f.N-OSE TAXLOT #= 292405 '901 S 2:512400 15 wBAI(ll]~ PARCEL NOfim1& RENTQN LIJA-t:J;I-04+ UA REC NO 2D0101Q05l.g00Do:j WCH IS FOR Of SW 1/4. 29-24-0) l'( WL 'f OF aN RR co R/W LAT: 4-7 32" ,4-. LONG: -122" 11' 5,3. October 2, 2007 SeahawksiDock Lakes Streams Study l00207.doc SCALE Stream and Lake Study -";';';';'\ \~:::;:~ l~{~~,~~l~:\ KENI.lORE JUANIT,6, KJRKLMD ~:::t,t:::~~l\;r Cf .''''''''~ ~ ):~~:::;::~ 1 ~ (::;:: tA:::::1, NEDI"''' ~ T:'~%;}r~f;;"" '!1~ ~ ~ j~[ ~~: ~ ~ ~; ~~:i; :,~~} ~ ii~ 1';';'\ ;';<.~~~-.. BEl.l..f.'VUE t , - - ------;------------·w-----------------, AREA MAP$cale:L=3rT1il~sJ ·i " Ii I, Ii il :i Ii it !: , " d " II Ii " ii CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC Football NW, LLC -Dock Replacement Renton, Washington Stream and Lake Study .. -.. ------------,~-------->-------------~------.--- -,----~.~-~----,-. -.--------------.--~-._-----,_.----_._-.--._ .. --,--.----._------, / ,,<i' / ~* El:15rJNG PIER MISlY COVE CONDOMINIUMS 5021 RtPLY LN N / RENTON. IVA. 980.5& ~~ / OHIII' .f::, 21J'JOI~ J" EXISTINC , SHOOEUNE {y'f' :.. ... jii' ''I>~.~ ,,§ ' .. / / ' ~i' PSE ~~ LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD ~ RENTON, 'liA '91:3058 October 2, 2007 " OUENOALL TERMINALS 4SOJi LAK[ WHHNGTON BLW REl'ITON, WA '9:eo:)o SeahawkslDock Lakes Streams Study /00207.doc FOOTIWl.. NW I..AI(E WASHINGlON BLVD RENTON, WA geD56 2!3'2040~aD1 J08 srrE FOOTEtALL tlW I..Al(E WASHINGTON BLW RENTON. WA 9&056 28240~015 / '~ j/:-;' / / / 1/ I / EXISTING PLOT PLAN I ., CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC Footbail NW, LLe -Dock Replacement Renton, Washington 'i ! i ,I I L October 2, 2007 SeahawkslDock Lakes Streams Study }00207.doc E:(IS1HJG EIOJ.TSH ED TO 8E RETAINED i Stream and Lake Study ! , 1, I I I CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC. Football NW, LLC -Dock Replacement Stream and Lake Study Renton, Washington r'o' , ii i i I • I , , , : i OljW~ 21 October 2,2007 I , i ! \1 -.," (I ", •.. 1" (15, f.>Hl.iP(J~;[t:' fj" .-f10·, • .g. ',I ;-.'1 "J) ~Trn f>, Fe-'" ~:, '. L. l f' , '~['WIW 'j' ',": ii" "":"" ::-. ': ~-,,';"'; ~:',:'~ '1i~~fim':'" '''HI' ' '!.q:: J _ '",,:,-' -, '-,i' "t; '," <. ',"""'.' , , "", ":.' ,;---'--:~O'---_-'-;'tJ ! ~1A:lt,:u~~~~~1llt!li"~~jgitM~1, 1 '. H~~~~.~111JWi~I~1i!illll.I~RIFf!l!IiliW,,1~~[1IM!lUlllul1j;l.nmJ~9n1(flt~\;!! / ' I C~) ?P,OPOSF.) C, f'ROPC5t.D f:JL"V .,/ \ '-J ~(L ~~'T:.REC GRATED "'I£.H PI[J~ \', ~", "_~_,_ ,"k, FI' .. f::: ,.,_ ._ .~ '_".,"" . ·.----" •. ~~.15.:Y 1'1' !JrT.."!,li 'v'!EV/ \ i , Ir ,I ;:U../.i'; 1 "";w' \ (15; PR'POSeD ?" _~~F~ PRCi"{:<;JO ~-:Jt.: 'f CRATe:) ;'IER p~c~~ '::TF\//\TiU.J VI['~\" 20' 1::;' Hf ::,' 0' SC/,L[: ,"=20' ,,' ,---'-----,=:C:-C=C-" I-~ ~;:-l>"r'; ~ ," ;:' , ",'. ,,\. \', \ ,', l , , '\ \ I, 't" : ; , : : ",.1 <' 1 I J I , ' I I I i _' i '-"--.",.-! , i i'~':~ '":,0,1 I'QClHALL ~Yi LL,( I !I",:,:~ .. : .. ):REMovt [xISTIN:> ?ER Ah:D REr;(I.C~ '.\',7;( I N::'IV 'P'ffi (N NEW LX'Ali':l1'\ ! I I, \'.'.-,,1; LA"::[ WASHIJ'.,C'ON/RCNTOt. __ n __ . __ .. ___ '_ m~",_j ~;_~~~_: __ ;_~=.~~_~.Q~ .~ .. ~._I; __ '!_:;!_2~:-_}3.Q.~g~ 4. r CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC SeahawksiDock Lakes Streams Study J00207.doc Football NW, LLC -Dock Replacement Stream and Lake Study Renton, Washington 1 ! i • ! ' ; i i! II I I: I Ii " i' ;-----------"-H',;.---------- ". STAJ»'l(SS ~.H[[:.. 7:.4 >,jA't£R i.J GRA-;'I\G -"-. /-"-DfC1< 5C~~WS 11:1" u/~ '/.lAX, \ ""-... l;;;'I;"v,?:v~\T%TG'7""?<"C,"*y:<'7';"7"7;tr',."7;'Y."<~r ~tl: [t;~· ~;"M ~/ ," i l"y""'. _/4 / -;:c';" \ PILl CO'l :r1 Pl.ATE CAl' 'iF,",I,! ASS[MG:.Y " ',-_....c,;;. PROc:J0S~D S'~CTI::)\' "i:~\\: .1,. ,- :'iCAcf: .V4'·"1' , eM "C'-c ') ""'-" " ,,·.,1 v. STEEL Pi'..IN{) !-GR"':-hG ___ "-b'-l~,~'"' '·-·~~-i;-;.~;~~~:S~--S~~·£~ .. j (:1<4 Nil U:-f< ~ ~ / J':::;< SCREv.'S ~-l/b~:02~ GLU-!AV ilEAV 18" o/e "lAX, \, "- .7 ,~..f,/",~ __ -.:'<-':,>/<-.3,-')0 . ",<,.-:-:<_,,'x'Y~ ,~/)""'-I 2~-3 JOIST @ 2' o/e 3/4" G,\LV. ~H:('J "(DC ~)(6 Rll.i J~IS1 I..tAT[RII'.L l..:ST --" -.-'.-.. -~.~-"'~"1-' ... -~'""-. --1 PILING 6" 51!) WALI_ t,i->DX"l!' ::GA1ED -I ~ -" 'CAPS 'Nf)) 15 ",," 8,AM CALVA}lI2[O ~-" ........... '-.'" .. -.--,,_. ---.'" .~-_ .. _.-~ - ---,-.,-, -,-.. --~~.-,. ! SLU·-LA,IAS ~ :5 1/8~~HI~ D" #-ClA rRO_':1SFS, S€CTI~~J nIM.1IN(~ A-5 It" 6" J" D' ,- --72 kJOIST : 2'~o--------cr#2 OR OTR ACi.". 50.LE: 3/4'\,>1' ~- H).;J CA:-V. CO!VVON :-.A',L~ (TV?) :~~4 l.EnGE_~ w/ t/'1"~7~ GALV LAG I]OLT C 10" ole , , 1,"~;~~.;:',~:E:l-:~~_~:,~,~:".,~)~·,J:.9~~]~~~· IICZ/, ! NNLIRS; 2"x4" DF .'12 OR f:o-:TR ACZ>\ LLmGFR; J"x4" Dr il2 Of< t>7R : AClA I CRAJIN'5-t;:icrUJ(Co PLAS~;C:-(·HKt:"-F'-O'N)~---'-'ON:: r;iAR!);;7Ai~[t"--~w~. ,., -STE[L~'o,<o"" " ',-". t'~~:r:~~L~SS ·Cli~_~V. r~~~~~~~~~~;;~;;~~~~;;~·~·" II :->'\Y r;~lE!ALL t,W LLG .1 ,,:~.: '~--::'·':;:R(VQV~ EXI~,T1NG ;;;TR AI>;O. RU'IJ.Cf: W-"I I I NEW PER IN "E'N L~CArI:}\, hc.":' ,A" LAKE W;'SH:h'GTCNjRENT'JN II !~~.:;.: _ ~ti ~ () I "~~., --.. :-,k~i~!!:!::~~~.~::,:::L:. ___ -' j - October 2, 2007 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC. SeahawkslDock Lakes Streams Study J00207.doc ~. F aotball NW, LLC -Dock Replacement Stream and Lake Study Renton, Washington ."~:~'il .... .. __ . , I I, Ted G.t..LV. CCI.tM(;t.; t-,,\ILS (TY!:!) r·' ""."J' S':" .... :NlES-;. SlEE~ 7}:~ I~"::.E~ ~~ ""._ r Di::;..; SSh:rW$ 18 O/S MA:~. ~ _. CR.~T'\C ~ .. "··,?,··r-' __ ._'/ .. .,{.,,_.~ __ ,., .. ?,.?' __ ~ ..... '~. ._:::-r*Y/~~.,~:.,:_:\:CY":~_~"~~;~ ::-~= _/_. g~l;!~Zl~~1J I . --.. .. . -r.~ 'Jt.3. t.A~ iJO ... l I C": "E','.' 'I 1 1// L/ 'S""3,' V/ > .,.- T'""F ~ C t= '-" CC'TE: t= """. PIl~NO \. P., i w'E" ;'l~AT~ ..c:-:'-''''' i-;ROF'0S:;~) SFC'"IO,\ \/~".\' 8-6 $:::A~(: l~"'" 1-"'-"" .. ,".'3'-\01~'·'· I :.> .. 4 NNLf", Q Itt C/~~ Y.AY.. S7A'NLESS STEt::.. ,J':CO: SCRtws ,... ~R".TIN" / / ~--1/8-X'2~ /' '~:._I.":-L.l,1,oI BLAIJ ,_,.:,.7'~·'-:-'~:i1=_ ',~.k"-i "ftt- '-'.JJ F'of~--~~ . · ~ • , "M JO."l _ . .. --~G" ; \ ,,' . ", LH)(,,~ " . , , l!r~? ()~_\. --! "G BOLl " . • \ -1/4" C,'ILV LJ. / . ihRU R:OJ 2 .. 6 JC;ISi ) e 2' -;:,·/c w, ' lc~ ole >':~,\V ~.,;[; t" 6 "-:-::--1 \>,'l..vA,N,;Z,E~ i .. --'AclA'" '1 "'~All: l"T~' JCI:jl ~ 2",,6" cr i2 OR GFi ,-i f,C:fA i i 'I i i , I II 'I ! I i i i I , , Ii , : \ ii Ii l i :i : i I .,.J I i ·Ri;;;-:jCjST"·:---'"~;·-:,,-6"H-·i)J:-·~;;;-Oq~·-·--~·--"--;;CZA ..... -.'~'-"-"",~."",,-." .--~ ~.-"~,, ._,.' _ .. " .... ,,~.-,-+,--~"" """"'"~'-~ NAlLSRS" 2" .. 4 H DF f2 O'? 6;:( , ACZA LEDC~~R' .Y'l<4 H cr #2 Ol-l (flR AClA "'ONC,c--- t:r;·7!:::':(:~'··;" .-~--'----, 0' ;",i~:-"'jl<FO()H!ALL tWi u.C ----t--,-~--~,-- GRATING j MULDE:) ~lAsriC (T'o-lf\U··· rLO'II') r;;;,R,5~YAR[<·r·'~"-· S!E£L-"·"'-' .. ST AI~LESS"-Cf{"'Ck.V. October 2, 2007 SeahawksiDock Lakes Streams Study l00207.doc :::--'.::l<.:·,,-.);REMOW: C,(ISTI"IG P'ER lING REPLl,(:i.: W-;CI NiW P;ER IN NEW lOCA'IICt{. i'.·'':'' LAKE WA$H;NGTON/Il(NTON I : ~~C~':'?l:::-_::~~.~J:' .. <-", 07~~:~~~:! .-"' ~ .. --.--,-----.-- CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC Foothall NW. UC ~ Dock Replacement Renton, Washingtun APPENDIX 2 PLANTING PLAN from Stream and Lake Study Seahawks Corporate Headquarters and Training Facility Stream Mitigation Plan (December 12, 2006) October 2, 2007 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC SeahawkslDock Lakes Streams Study J00207.doc Football NW, LLC -Dock Replacement Stream and Lake Study Renton, Washington "I I -, t-; ., 'I ,; i <" , ;~ I '1 -' ".1 01 I_~ . ~-.. -~ ..• --.' .. ' ::;f~ND FI:_~ER H':'OROS~TD Mj~<: ,\;;.::r-,"'Cf,," •• >,,.. _(lo.,.",,"';: •• ·4· ... _A~ =."" .. ,,--, .. ,-=====, 1Tili:~ii:;-:~~~,='J--;i; ._~ '''" .. "er" Si \OR::LIN[ fJLA.NT!t\~; NOTES: · .... ~:'. "",~,~ •.• ".,.,.,.".-." ...... ~..,,, I',,· ••• ,,>, :_~:..::~ .. "'~':":,.' .::,~;~ ~;;:,.~~;;! :..~~-.:;~~::'~.:;.:' .• '.i:";>~:-c' • ~'I '. ",", (~"'~);", ", ' ..... !,,,,,_.," • ....,~ ""'" "..:;~ , ......... ,;., .... ~:.'-'. "'........" -" h,. n<"" ~"",",', " .. 'J"',...,o~'''''~.j .. '''~ , "" • .,.-" ','" .'. _" "~ ~ .. """" ~ ",,'~. """""T'" · ,",",,",,"-'"->-'~"" " ..... ,., '" k "X' ",'"" ·,..-.... T"'<~_--:' •.• "~", ,~ , ,~;",,,,~ ... ,,' ~, .. ' .... ~1>''''~'' "'_e'Il':"'''~'' _, ,"", "' .... n>.' ,-" '''-~U'-''''''''~'' .. ~""~ ~,-""\J' , .. "" , ""-'"",",,, l,',T:\., :, .... , ''"_''-'"'''''''''''''' ,.,,, '" ,.,." i.·:r....,'" ""","." ... ,. '.' ,,,."~.",.~ '_'Y, ",~,.,."., .,. , •• -...... ., .... ",." , .. ,.,_,'", 'I, ""'_ ~""".",,, ',,",-. ,,,'".,, ._ ... : "",~,) • ~ __ "', "''" .. ..."... ~ ".~. c· ......... J.,,"~."' .-"., .... -""" ....... ' .''?~;<"","7.:.'':~ ',:!, .~',;,c;f.;. ·;;:~";r;~..;;. q.',.,' ....... , ,,, ... ,,.,, ~ ..-.~" ....... """'..., ,,-.,.'. :,..i:,;,:."n-.,.,., '.,," "'" ..... , ,.,. <.v, , ~ -.,-•. , "" '" ." "",,~," ... ~"' ,,~.,~, .. " .. ~,,-,_"" ... n~ ''''~, ,"""."'. ,,~"" .... ! ., ',. ~,,~ .. , """", "~,, ~".',," (~"""'" ''N,'--' ,,,<,,,,,. '''~ ".'" ,",,"'-"'''"'. " ... ,,.;, >.' ... ~ "-.. ""-"'"~' '" M"-'» ,,,-,,,,,,,<, •. ,,.,,,.,. C:i3 ~;t_:;;.;.,",,:,~ , .. ~ y,' ~~ ~';:";';":'.:"; .... -, .. ,~ " •• > t>elo2.1o"~-"-•.. S!-I:)Ro~IN[ ZONE "I. ,~NT SCt-iUUL[, c;:.':.:' ~-.0".,"",·).0"' (_.;~. .,~ "1 ~ II· . ::.~8~jf~r~~~~~~-~/:T~i~~:~::~L}:-::-·~·-.~_:r~~~-.. ~-.~~-_ I -,. ~ '.--'~ '.-o~-;cr"~--,. I ':-"1 ~~. ~"'"-~;~~, .. _:f'~:f"'t~)'~~-=-r 1>"_~_'_.;. L. __ ... e~'~~J,~il~c~ .. -j'~:~:. .-.'" -,," 'I '!:r>!~ti=:i; . '-"",.::,"~ ,~:.~.~: , .... ~~~ , ., e ~ t.c::-crt;< I~~~~~:-~~~£-tt~~~ lil:l. r-,~~ltJl!S. UN~ 1"~tJO-:-tfr·,,=ii'~ ".'''---,-,; ... --+--,--' 1 '" -a",toJ~ l7D ~~ \Tr~'~~~~~~,,~;~:u,·_1!j~-~·rii~,_~-~;~;~~f-~?~~~:_--':-:~--~~-~i ! ~~~ ./-(~< ,I '1 . "'.':l 0) ........ _J ,.0 000 Sf "'---~".--'~"~i---~'=------.; - . .... .. · . t.-I~~~~'~ ~;., ~ i~", ~:f~':-J ;: .. ,r:>' ...... ,,~,". , -. "'-'-"""~=-= "-, -, . , r---I ... ~,,,~.I"', / ',,,.,,,=,,. '1"11.4"" .. ,.,,, 00c::.4 ,,..~,. "") I ...-,_,,,,,.r .-' l.'V7"r. _ , .... ""' ......... " .... ~M'~ ..... "' . 'j~ I"""~:: \ / j'~~I'(T!<>" i ~ :.~-:;:;:~~ ;;;:;:;." -. , '.~ .. ' ... '.c.'.--. 'I ,I, f,'· , :t:T~ "~~~:'-jl :,;' ), ... " 1 ···'l'~i"::"'''"''!?·'~'' :"'::;~;JRl •. /H" to! -:L: _ i~ T r ~;;'~;~~~·-'.~~-!·~~~~i ::;~-=,,~, - October 2, 2007 CEDAROCK CONSULTANTS, INC SeahawkslDock Lakes Streams Study i00207.doc • ~ Printed: 11-15-2007 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 ----------------.... __ .. Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA07-137 11/15/200710:03 AM Receipt Number: R0706164 Total Payment: 2,000.00 Payee: LAKEFRONT JOINT VENTURE, LLC Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Payment Check 000085 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax Amount 2,000.00 Amount 500.00 500.00 11000.00 Balance Due .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Remaining Ba1anr-e Due: $0.00 , .