Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
REPORT 01
H3AIL:GVgkoU S3dO-1S 9009 Hod Som VM,3-U-Lv=ls NO 03SV8 V�linHVelOC]133SA30(d3 HInOS 31N3AV HIM - 9zmw <71 'o =wrLLn=i.J,bVV41Ud N083H 31NIOd 0-n N083H 31NIOd inGS 3'N", CIZ, -a' oort,[ cr Serr w cf)F- UJ cl LU w Z D LLI CC cf) w F- W < ir 1.0 W < CO ww N U) Z) +1 LPCn ()o W U +1 w< cr CD < C) Ns < U- >- CJ < 0 LL T +1 0) 0- 0 Oil LL o w F- < w 0 n Z U) 00 0 cc FL �z (L LIJ F < 2: 0 0 a_ W 0 0 < CE 00, 0- IL I- Z FL < w W 0 CL w0u) 1) 0 w F- IE w Z Q _j U)Z < ir W !T) -j w W W W > W 0 111 F- m z co Ir u - R! LL F- oz -17 1/ i,2/:D w w< W0 LA LL q TZ wA, cr F- T 0 < F- - 0 U) co +1 OW CL LL w LL < z LL o U -LL LL W Ji I w w wo cf) 0 U- 09 0 n < << l: <o �— w cr cr m �j L9 52 P3W X ui z CL Iq 178 ill II § OZ 1w <W oar Ow? z ELL WOE Z 00 0, Z 0 0 15 248 �(JJwj gWNa fig mg aWE gi .9u, III IL J M < W L r k rN CITY OF IRENTON pf S3dO'lS 9003 H.LnOS At HSI (13SOdOEW ROM VM TLUV3S -SAa(3 HlnOS �InN3A,V HM - 9ZI6 NO GaSVe V38V MGVJO oozvt 3UrLLn=l kHVV418J N083H 31NlOJ 0-n NOd3H 31NlOd OZ404 11— "Ill, CIL co U) el LJ o N < C) Go 0) ui Cc +1 N W LL 0 0 < ep L w A, T- cr- 0� w LL Fr m F- EL 0 w U) LLJ w m cr) w w LU < (L m Lc) 0 cq W LL cr) LL -i w >- O_1 < U- 0 0) J LL 0 LU 11 Z Q Cc D cr) z LL o < m a- m Z F- W LU o W a- ui F- U) 0 Z -J F- W ri) -J W W j— M U- m z w 0 LL < 0 LU w 0 >U<i �r 0 o ui U- 2 CL LL Z Lo < LL 0 LL LL 0 U- 0 0 103 < < j% LU w w w m Cc CE < < < 2 �W z II I ol aW 0 'wl go�q, <8 & Mw F �j 12 �M 'N d W tz 0 <Fws A t APR 2 7 20115 CITY OF RELINM N PLANVNG DWI ION ir S3JO-IS 3003 HinOS AI:H9 L GDSOdOJJ 80196 vm D-Uivgs �,iros NO (33SVe V38V TIGVJO-SG HinOS 3nN3AV HIOL - 9M gldrk.Lnd A8VN18d NOW31H RINK)d 0-n NOU3H 91NIOJ 7� 1 1 IM N-�I ooft -W L 3,2, rw, w cf) 0 W z LLJ W 7) cc co cc w F-- 0 Cf) w cr w < U) Ir W LLJ LP F- 00 :D C\j LL MN w LL w < 0 0 C\j 4p +1 If x U- 0 1: F M F- oil q LL, m w < 0 Ej Z cr) m w cc Qac C) 1z ey z (L Lu 0 0 IL w 0 0 < CE _j CL (L _j Z W [L W 0 W IL CL w F- U) 00 cr z -i z F- W w > Lj- -i w LU w cc [L QQ IE o (WI) w w X fr LL < LL () 0 Z F D LU W< w 0 LL w > Cc OF +1 0 Lij F 0 U) oil U) z CL UL ILL < CL W Z LQ Cc LL 0 Li- LL U- LIJ 0 LL 09 oil) W= �- < 0 < (L W W 0 W w I Cc X X Cc C- WP, IL 44 < 19, . ...... —. wj WQ, �y Lp < S -3-W hq- 'i z� I w V, 1 in F 1� 2, 1 l,,j I A. 1 83JOIS 3003 HWOS AL4491 03SOdOdd Rom Vm,a-LLLvgs NO 03SV8 V38V 3nGVJOMAM KMOS 3h)N3AV Hi(Oxt - 4116 3UrW)3 A~Idd NOL13H RLNKM 0-n NOH9H 31NIOl00zh -erosYN311 C— 1-11 Lli < c) L0 00 0 +1 +1 z —L'ON Lo w Oa 0 I W 0 E� 0 4, A < w Is_ LL F - w Cf) w M C() cr W LU W (L L0 0 < Cf) W LL (J) +1 CE LL _j w < 0 > LL 0T- r,y w LL — M 0 +1 o w 11 z LL CI 0 < 9= Fpm >-F- W 0, t �zlit m LL, 5 w CL co 0 w F- CC z CO W (L co P < W W m LL 1Cc Z LLJ 0 < CLL M - U- C)'i LLJ L Lij3 Lij lo cl: FL 0 S2 z rj) w z h�: opo' > w LL T - (L z In LL 0 U- LL 0 LL 0 0 w www w CE M: cc m Ic 10 �0W. 0. 00 z '09< IiL L] w 2 ff NO Wo 0 Al CV, O Flo I C� � O N • z A N O �W Q C sir 8 2 O cc CCO Liu ~ .• •.� ' �'� a U OC a 1 � k3 • i • ■ 1 1 � • ■ ■ ' O ■ W QW Q ■ • C Q , • (� Y • C - 03 o •• a �W Q C sir 8 2 O -- - -3 1 -.1— m —„ 'ON 8W '3'U'8 cS/NOlj3H 31NIOd s3aw3s ru3Nxawi3 roauw,ns 9....... SNVId NOLLV1fl16VH3d aNV 9216-M (90Z) aiamd mm a 334%3 360 +' o 006Z-46496 VM '31UV3S s a "OSA `3JVNIVbU V%3IAA xve tete-Isz(sza) Y ONIOVHO 133HS HaOO ZOL 3LfIS 'HIM)S 3f1N3AV 1Sl 0909 zzz9-Lsz(sza) i ��� NOH3H 31NIOd zcoes vx 1N3I d winos 3nN3AV aNZL slzei sndHO A t2k I ! a $'� N Z CL dC! Z = O �O ppa agawi '� Q b A Q§83 u R Ss §Sgg \ yy W Q ZrjjN - y 4�,..-,t W w w W g Z� X5 a� 4 1W W i gip._ X4 ay i��i'le91; ��NNiAi�9 iI M \ o _ oAga,®®o0oo®$%EC®mle CC 52 "AR 7G0 6bW n i O is "`� w1w 1LS 19 q-gq R Jim Wj x 41 � -- Soo �4m 8 AN . N3 sm g k VP eS/NOH3H 3UMW e.,, addr 3iw +e raisU3a «. ssioM aya^d !0 1uawV�dsd MtYO •a m. sNV-ld No11V1nIeVH3a CWV �- 0'99 '3OVNIVHO MaLNI NO LN32i 'DNIQVM - LEM HEIA03 30 ALIQ �� OOZ=d 0141083H 3LNIOd (1S3M) SNVId NOLLVinSVHBU SIV `O'S'3 `30VNIVHO NNEU NI 'DNKNUO - 13SVHd Z J CL Z 0 Q ---- -3 .�_.�:rws mseas .roc/ais..,�ynm ew sa.aox+s\ti Wwc\aoni\+000.�Va:a3 OoZ% ONSOf 306 5ZI6-Z9L (90Z) 00VZ-KM VM '3I11V3S Z0I 31UIS 'HDIOS 3nN3AV 1SI 0509 OII N0H3H 31NIOd lei. isrW YL= -4a G�2 t$e �s�y Y 3-Vx za `€W� Fd�r £B �e E'z9�� gig Iv « n. NOLLVfNllINOO HOA e3133HS 336 53Nll35 T'1H311N0iW13 '�111A3AaI1S 9,Miii py+ "JMIMNIId ON✓I'�33Na113 WJ W II zv3 zece-Isz(sz1>) 8 zzze-isz(sze) LCO96 VM '1N3N Z ' N1O05 30N3ntl ONZL SIZBIiA 6,nVH0 W i�!! M I UJ iS/NOUgH 3LMOd>+.. aaar 3iw se NOISW3a or+ a a�N+.Nmi� rmiw .v,. US3N� SNVId NOLLV1f119tlH3!! (INV `O'S'3 NO�N3i1 '3OVNVl:KI YVIl131N b"OVU0 - 13SVHd 30 ALIO -- ws ra�r.»«s3 .� .�.ra+s m mn� +�x/s/a:a„i/•+aa aar ss•-aoz.�W�.W�w�wn��•m�i4a:ge =% -ON 80(' 3.79 ON089H 31NIOd 53wW35 NlH3NNDtlNH3'?IUiW11S yM OMI OM, W � N SZl6-Z9L (90Z) a aNM a m wa33wa 3 Iw w , a i Og Sl OOhZ-M% VM '3-LLLV3S xvd ZOL9-109ZO) 11 R � S., USV3) SNV-1d NOLLVl)-IISVH3H (INV "OSA ZOl Mins 'Rims 3f)N3NV At 0909 zzZe-isz(sz>) 3OVNVHO YVIH3IN ONIOVHO - t 3SOld NOH3H 31NIOd I zcoea vx 'LZ Z�'�VH`� . kenos 3fI l ONZL LIZBI 3 (Q .� 5R CO 9 PR LLr ho .. ��•,,,� �,�/� � _ ,.� �\y�\�� Irl Q — � � l�'l j � `l � fig, / y;'✓ � �, �! / � pPI_", t= _i—� E / /�� ilgl t r a Ld i w 2�98T a - 911 M �Pj81 a rr I I I I m !I�4 o 'I � ����:;�►�11v��I��1�1�ti.'�,.,�,.,.,.��l�tiL�.�.��.� �.>..11��� �.�lx\ili.;l ' '��t� , � i��ll7���....•.�.;.�. NOILVrYANOO HOd Z9 139HS MS .S/NOH3H 31NOd aadv �w s Noisw3a a avoM a,la�d )� IuawVooaC y (1SV9) MVld NOLLVLI8VH3H OMd `OS3 NOJ N32I 1l* 3JVNIVHO RlHa1NI tNIOV610 - l 3SVHd 30 OLIO 6Tii � ---- w6 to�xslBa 1 -.I.w6 na LSL now+/P.Wvnw s.9ca-aoznWa�w i•,a�9oen�wooK\a..l =K ON 8W 338 eS/NOFJ3H 31NIOd C !f y' 9916-Z9L (CCN) snaw3s rul3 enoxaw'�r1—. a►e.aoeLt "JM.M " 'J 33.1%3 IWC y 9'lZl OObZ-MM VM '3-UV3S 'HMM %tl3 Z9L9-lSZ(SZ9) A �a `1 \ I 9 911 M 3i]nS 3rIN3AV 19 0505 ZZZ9-19z(9z>) LC096 VM '1N3N Z�d1n�H�ad� 1 I 1. 1 I ' I w SNOLL03S SSON.7 - l 3SVHd 0-1-1NOd3H 31NIOd H1n0$ 3nN3AV ONZL s1z91 tC96 24t1 oPo 3Z1LL klOd Q Q > « 1 s 9c Pro ytl Pre Po 4w am en L 6B L6[ II 1 l I I I I I I I 1 I 9'lZl 4L21 1 1 1 \ �a `1 \ I X911 9 911 Le 1 9[It 1 I 1. 1 I ' I w 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I tt'a11 0911 � tC96 24t1 oPo a� H® 1I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I� I I I rs I 1 I I Q Q > « 1 s 9c Pro ytl Pre Po 4w am en L 6B L6[ II 1 l I I I I I oPo IW �'g �� I 0001 eool slot I., / 1 + I Trot trot Isol o., 1 1 1 �I ed 3 le I'll sal sul roll P601 I / I ��c B"[o1 Latl CL11 oKl I I 1 I 9'lZl 4L21 ` N \ 9 i 91 I PI Cl) � d�j�1 `1 \ I 9 911 9901 1 I 1. 1 I ' I w co 1 m i 2 Op i F tl U= � bio ko:' \ �3 tt'a11 0911 r<II sell 24t1 oPo a9c 1K Bae sae 1 s 9c Pro 8 e 49 1 1 8 It 1 I 1. 1 I ' I p8 s9 I �Ctl co 1 m i 2 Op i F tl U= � bio ko:' \ �3 0911 r<II sell 24t1 oPo o F� P@ e Bae sae 1 s 9c el oe ytl r' L{ - I en la C L6[ 8 e 49 1 1 8 It _ — xo.3rx.s1 j _.. ws ..'L _bb4t ON SW 30'13 aS/NO89H 31NIOd 9zt6-z9L (90z) s3 1s ,.�x3roaawu 'au.i;.wns �wexaeM�r "Jx.x a-'� 33N�x31 �� V 3: U.S3M) SNV1d NOLLVInleVH38 OW `O'S'3 0062-"Aw VM'3Z1 vas XVe zeta-tsz(sz>; 3 Z '30VNIV80 W4J3W 'ONIOVM - Z 3SVHd ZOt 311f1S 'Rum 3nN3AV 1St 0509 zzz9-tsz(s_e) � ZCOB6 tlM '1N3Y Z' Eo Z 011 N083H 31NIOd Hi1105 3()N3Av ONZL LtZBI 311L1 �3 pwODyggg�ypyp LSV 5 m NOLLvnNLLNOO UCCA 93133HS 33S } Af*+w ewt..+I�a Pi}Iw,wa r1 �. .a .a�a.a.a�,.�++lRi'I"�}"}�T"i�R n. d" W 3: U) Z Eo Z m NOLLvnNLLNOO UCCA 93133HS 33S } Af*+w ewt..+I�a Pi}Iw,wa r1 �. .a .a�a.a.a�,.�++lRi'I"�}"}�T"i�R n. d" pwODyggg�ypyp 3�W 10. ..1333 o � � 1 �\ \\ g d 4 �,, � 1 U 111 I � •���'� � r�� off€ ,k \`11 �� :6,g LUGo m NOLLvnNLLNOO UCCA 93133HS 33S } Af*+w ewt..+I�a Pi}Iw,wa r1 �. .a .a�a.a.a�,.�++lRi'I"�}"}�T"i�R n. d" E RAI g3i I . \ 6 A V, � -------- 14"k — »4d 1 \I C„ild iC �i. II Lt u i eS/NOL9H 3LNOd a a-- addv 3ivo is Noatn3a a+ ehoM ailOnd )o IuawVoeep -- U& M) SNV1d NOLLV-LJ-lWH3d OW "O'S'3 0 '30VNIVW HU LM bNIOVM - Z 38VHd NO LAI32I 3�W 10. ..1333 o � � 1 �\ \\ �B 4 �,, � 1 U 111 I � •���'� � r�� ,1`\s �����t1�t�,,M ,k \`11 �� LUGo E RAI g3i I . \ 6 A V, � -------- 14"k — »4d 1 \I C„ild iC �i. II Lt u i eS/NOL9H 3LNOd a a-- addv 3ivo is Noatn3a a+ ehoM ailOnd )o IuawVoeep -- U& M) SNV1d NOLLV-LJ-lWH3d OW "O'S'3 0 '30VNIVW HU LM bNIOVM - Z 38VHd NO LAI32I - - .—I I -- . :s " 'ON BW 308 .S/NO83H E"Od — -- — OMONiOryt I i gzwz9L (NZ) aiNN a OW W034W IIND OMZ-VCM VM'a-UV3S XYI Z9L9-lSZ(9zo) USV3) SNY-W NOLLVJJ'118VH3U GNV "O'SA ZOi 31M,HJt)OS 3nN3AV 1St OGN zzzq-Lgz(gzt) IA 1. LN 3r V4lH3lNl bNKTVID - Z 3SVHd 01-1 W)U3H 3INK)d �nOS ]nN]ZA'VO'U'NZL 'I L Z. Cf) Z AN. \Al > Ld Cy A L L 1E Ir (jj uj 'ISM WW� - All ..% WW #�aa .i �I \ / / / / Rsg I ;d ° �T /,, 3 I) /s�y4 ib'.s f r7 U5 ag 'y is77 w TiV- ;j Z I't ... . . .... .. I Ag %l cc ............... Q Wp 7, NouvnNUMO LK)=l 99 139-0 MS li .S/NOL9H 31MOd m- aeav nen +H Noisu3a a+ (1SV3) MV-ld NOLLV11lIBVH3U CINV `08-3 90VNWdO ALSINI DNK]Vb!D - Z 36VH.1 30 A113 -FIE 1 -- w, 03 93 n k �, > o ni: w NULL o�awa l moon d. ppZgt ON BW 308 eS/NOd3H 31NOd SZl6-Z9L 907.) oobZ-Km VM '3ZLLV3S ZOl 311f)S 'HbIOS 3nN3AV IS 0909 SNOLLO3S SSOHO - Z 36VHd 0-1-1 NOUH 31NOd pp TULL F!? � 3j n a z I t ti ii 2� �� zzze-Isz(sze) "1 '113N es a't LLtI u� INI a'u SjndFi�i'� (7 ME 3 Jp T I 1 t I I t9re rul ll� II L"rte S rL� rw xK Lrzi arz� /I z I I O r cr su 31N rsx c tl a3; o x �K �.cc xcc I I I $ 53JWL35 NlN3NgxWi3 'MIIANb115 'JwIxNVld ONVI 'xlld'33NJN3 IWJ %Vd mg-ISZ(SLD) +9►eM1 eM a ,x �e a I rf I t,i ® C$ Q 8 ii 2� �� zzze-Isz(sze) "1 '113N u� INI AV N noS inN3AV ONZL SIZBI SjndFi�i'� (7 3 $ rul ll� II L"rte S rL� Lrzi arz� o O 8 O e I 'I I I 'I I 1, I I I I .I F3 f tl tlV Eq I rf I t,i ® C$ Q 8 l u� INI a' g �sLl ti 3 $ rul ll� II L"rte S rL� Lrzi arz� o O 8 O jlj� %I t W �39a tzs � eS/NOF9H 3J.NOd o aada 3 as a NOISW a ox SNOLL036 SSOHO - Z 9SVHd NOINHH 30 x,tto ---- 9 90;n0Mln . _.. < 007.41 ON eor aa'8 rS/NOH3H 31NIOd n SZ16-M (80Z) S3:1NN35 iYJN3Mb — "JNUYlYlS ONl.M OW "N 334 M3 I" 9iOwr8Mal �� --- ` ■ ii 004Z-M%VM'3-LLl.V3S 'HJ.IIOS 909 uV, zeta-Isz(szo) � ! 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I II I ^ as n �'MI 6I 61 SNOLLO3S SSOHO - Z 35•VHd Z0l 311(15 3m1 IAV 1Sl 0405 $a E qy qd gB zzz9-I0sz0 zcoe6 VM 'iN3N t� GG// Q 9 dl1LL 011 NOHAH aLNIOd 1103 Hi005 30N3AV ONU SIZaI �ndF��•a � 9rc' a ttL` 9t,a �rn rag 929 I I 1 1 1 II t I lR LK 9K LYY 9't[ a �" a p d RHE M o urn O U N COrW^ Izl � COu, I j CO -A oZ 9Z1 Q O ��1 _I �. I l eeol Un a8i da t Y 9't9t p} g r(V Q I 8 2 O oS/NOUAH 3LlNOd a a.• aeav 31w �.e Nolsln3e ow SNOLLOM SSOdO - Z 3SVHd NOIN32i `•9 30 ALIO .�.�� ` 909 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I II I ^ as n A - � 8 yy 1 5t r,99 $a E qy qd gB Lai rail 9'lii cro�i [ cii I I e � a � � 9rc' a ttL` 9t,a �rn rag 929 I I 1 1 1 II t I lR LK 9K LYY 9't[ ppZM 'ON 90f' '3 a ,S/NOfi3H 31NIOd s3 s ra+3naoawz3 'snunwns SZ16-39L ( 90Z) x '�wrma arm rorna�3w�rv3 Iwo � b� OMZ-MM-UV3S XVJzeLe-rSz(9ze) i I M 3JJnS 'HDIOS 3nN3AV 19 040S zcoes vn z(SN3r Z S�IV134 OWS31ON 0-1-1 NOU3H 31NIOd unos 3nN3nv aNZL srz9 d \ � 53 y"33 0 g ON d^ a qq k i n �a O g a h T AIL xln. U) a LU �w Z ''/^� VJ W arc �� and a,wQcam. yyy� O (xu � s .�S�e ��4 J H iW polg .dag_�} 5 a e s a 3 5 � x a' � 3n� oe ya 9a €}a aak ;,£ ni 55 oo J �� 1g$!d'91g g"u5 >s 92 �wE p g Ells x y F 3$ 7 p (7 �c�' � . e wyi� x�� a�kgff goM i sgi° vu 1s "i�g,m55 S "g n w - csa a k ; 4s �a ,S/NO613H RiNDd ox ° o q aaax o e Hors as ox ,. .i a is ry wvoaoa wniva '� � — NOINHU S-Wi3O ONV 831ON M 30 ALIO y. waraa3 . - + 9si .iaur;e moi' a ewrv�-oo. 4= w.c, om aoo.. a+u oolt ON 80r 30'9 .S/NOH3H 31NIOd SZI6-Z9L (90Z) �auos ru�3nm;aw+3'avwwns '9NINM'W W '-33.�3lW? 0042-K'= VM '3- LLV3Sxv3 ze a ¢ ce-�st(sznl ZOl 311f1S 'H1110S 3f1N3AV 1Sl 0505 zzze- sz(szni S�M130 0NV S31ON IVOINHO31030 0-1-1NOH3H 31NKM zsoee vx 'in3r Z� d� �unos 3nN3nv oNzc situ S�VHha Qq BE E'1i .yE � u �R 3L Ly ,pn CO �J���,�.2����E _ SYi gg �sE'8E-`Lg� EF: F$ � R By 5 aE'a 8 gig i co s g E L O`er U -- ima egQ Ee'-oa s 4 ga < E FS €irk s; agap' yg 8 gN Nv.2 1 s s i ge`o Lw34!1a Sgs•.fro yi,$ 55 gg 3g x 8 E abs g y$&sEa� ci pulll if$ '�;i �` �5 lmo 111a §y g l�g�Y�i`� gas" 'ss € IN yg s � F € {$p� y � $g _€ ygwyfg� •{fid tw � � y g p2{�a�s a YY as 8�.q A$1 1�588�€g'8 1!L$$ge bay ` baa � E8 Y 888 a'gEt sai 1 I 't Z� wl sgig !ihlij ]!,,Ill Ill I aeu-m1 iy4§ � � E�y,�+�E g_tl�� � � �3•v �" �� E+ g g rs �� y P !� � g � s�2 s� a APs 555E j :�p10 � '11511 aS/NO69H R I N)d 3ma �e .wisin3a S7VV13C CNV S310N 1VOINHOM030 I NOINHH- 30 AILD ]S/NO83H 31NIOd dyW ,kHddHJOd01 - — --. .1=. was m-1 —Al/l:—v— —=K ON 80(''3'0'6 9ZI6-Z9L (90Z) 00bZ-KIN dM ,B- LLVgs ZOl 311ns 'H11103 3nN3Ad 1Sl 0609 0-1-1 NOU3H 3-LNIOd —S �Ill13RKWWl?'^MiA1VP'i5 JMiMwM 01M'O 33-3 1W-0 real„ Z NouvnNUNOO 60d Z 133HS 33SQ .�.�r.......... %Y3 Z8L8-lSZ(SZD) 8 JIM 1rl. ZZ2-11. (SZD) k Y Q Zt086 YM '1N3N � Z� 3 c G Hinos YN3AY ONZZ SIZBI NI,Ii 3Zill *4 1 Z NouvnNUNOO 60d Z 133HS 33SQ .�.�r.......... JIM 1rl. NI,Ii ���\\�,��\VAVA'VA ��1 � \V A\V AA\\\ \V A � � � � �� Ir �_`- i � � � � �``�%Jig �1 ��`•. � � "�,\VAV� A\ �V A \ 1 �ill,llllI �li! I i 1ii',Ii6� it i 1 •�iiq ,i',�!1 A, A \ \. A'•�\1�>��VA\\,A�V�' l8/NOH3H 31MOd c e o nedv 3 Yo a Noau3a dvW JJ-Idb'6JOd01 N01 -HU 30 ADD -ate as- - — -1— ., . — m o. ,, siozn,i,,—a wa a nn_oo „ ,vim m >,vaao .a,, 66ZbI ON" 3 aS eS/NOH3H 31NIOd —, —'auwx 9YOM3DM, i I 9216-Z9L (90Z) 'NINn 0-' 33M%3 iw 00$,Z -VCM ' in tlM '3 A Ltl3S � Q l %tl3 zeta-lSZ(5L>) CL $ N dVW J.HdVF�JOd01 as 311fIS 'HUIOS 3f1N3Atl ISI 0909 zcoeb vrez�iN3>I Z � 011 NOU3H 31MOd unos 3nI3M' aNu s ze �d+d� 311ll !!DJ CL J W LU CC V zco CL 52 CE LL o�C CL CD 1 �o*i Qd l iv cc CL /k, _ I 1 al 6�.��V�VViV1'� NOIivnNUNOO HOA I 1 aW 33S -- eS/NOEBH 3JNOd o a^ eddy j 3.w a Noain3n a+ M mu a ,e luo�uoma wn�w MM dVW )IHdV1dOOd01 Ko:LMHH 30 A,LI3s.a — 1-:1-1.- —, — , .,s .,. — _ ,\, .,, --rjjW *0N 80r S0.8 =61'18 13SNrIS om" 9zwz9L (WZ) owl mm Ym �ruvm XvA zglg-�qMzv) N -W OSM a4V FUf= 3rW3AV HIM =6 gzgz*) Nove I' tNKNW 7VUH bNWHIO 'ON 00 lNgVWO-800 Win ONrIM RMOS NNW QNZyLAA9LZRii 14 MLWKLH00 WW 60 1330 MB gNnHDLVn T? 77:171-11 ITMO, Tfm p Z' x �7 lei I 4". AN, 11 V� 1 1 , , " x 'w"'ovA U) w N", zol 0 fy— F= z co 2 Mr� w -71--- ... ..... ...... N" OSaL OW v 1VM tNUV310 Ao A210 '09-4 SBBi/<a/ti ._ f8C9L 'ON aor 3'Oa 330ie i3sNns 9216-Z9L (90Z) 90L96 VM TUV38 xre zacB-tBz(Bzt) NV -W OS314NV 'DNIQV6V -IVWNI HIMS 3f1N3AV HIM 9ZW ONVI WlU3N ZZz9-LSZ(SZt) ZCOB6 VM ; DINEV310 ON 00 1N9Hd0-I3A30 RMOS 3nN3W ONZL SII'iN39NL 31111 O✓ W ¢,a, 8 R 8 R. f ti R IL LA Ell uj W; crt f bra N � L Z % Q O 3 ; �� bg / F ; F z 44k l 1 Q> 8 .9 b — / fie« r ,iii Y I .Yr r 0iz llllllfllfflN' j' R '1%,+,'1,,x,)1 •;r _yyryry�� ��y��` �� .tr' �/� � ��;l,QI'I�Nliiiii. � _�' j:�L fi<'ii:�4�_. _Jd._:� 1TT-3: 6- ;`2..:v'r'. 33f119 13SNf1S -Lava ,+WM >•m�dJ� viMe/^�w�oy � : : m w/U< oar , x .� laum .n un su ! NV -W OS31 (INV NOINZZI T m iA a 'JNIOVM 'IVLIY�N )DNWV3l0 30 IUD � � d hof w as nn nuo aws movUa+we� muNm , eS/NOH3H 31NK).l 11SIHX3 M31A NV74J NOLL333 SSOHO - Z 3SVHd S � R 1 1 1 1 F 1 1 -- - — sown .1 _ .1.«mss . ass --dUK 'ON SW 3aS SZ16—Z9L (90Z) OOhZ-KU6 VM '3'lllV3S ZO1 311f1S 'H1f1OS 3f1N3AV 13 09M 0-1-1 NOHAH 31NIOd s3>Ina3s xix3naawi3 alu-«v >s 9rexa aM�b '9r�ixNtic dNVI '�Ma33M�N3 1V.J xa3 zece-Isz(szv> $ LL 96 VM (A Lt 086 VM '1N3N 1' � unos 3nN3nv a zc s1ze1 �6")"04d \ 8i W L«v i 3P p� W • + J � N 0 EL '. ' llll,l i 6iC i4 tll�llf911itii 1 A °IIIdI '; 1',illl1 �, A A A, � ;(\yU;divA\\\UQD:AAdV'ASt e S/NOH3H 31N0d e-- aaav 31w ! is rais;s3a ow cyoM agana )o IuawYoa«Q x(11Ya ss — BGIHX3 MRA NV"ld NOJ,NS2i 1(= N0110 -3S SSOHJ - Z 3SVHd 30 IM ---- — — .1 -- a ....... —bW"— ON SW 3"O"9 ,S/N0H9H BiNKM --S 1-- 1 1 I 9Z16-Z9L (90Z) 0— '-33'w ootrz-nm `dM ,3-LLLvgsXVI ZRLR- AGRG M91A NV -1c1 zot 3iins'HllIOS anNRAV iSt C909 ZZ.999 - NOU338 SSOUO - Z 3SVH.] VM iND I. 01-1 N083H 3ADd Zio96 ;A%- :A, �4inos 3r1N3AV ONZL 929t 0 - Y 15! 1 - AT` 2v Fn w Ld /0 'J P y LL jig 5" /* t= / ------ ItM W�gl w Cf) g U Lu Ct) W ell 41 te 2 V LL 01 z 4, F NOUVr"LNOO 64O3 CX i33HB MS S/NOERH RLP" 11131HY9 NOMA NV7c] NOINHH NOLO3S SS060 - Z 3SVHcl 30 A113 wM nD nl nn «w D ell .IBL/[I/D.�✓ wB fiwne aoLn crawl ww .l oa l\.e� 6W% ON 8W 3.79 aS/NOFJ3H 3J.NIOd SZI6-Z9L (90Z) S3'dJn�IM3NJld d �Nb33N�N-3y . awenaDM4j , J .J i■ 6 004Z-4£196VM'3-uiv3s 'H1f1OS XVI zeca-Isz(sz>) S + J Zot 3Ans 3nN3AV 1St osos zzz9-Isz(szs) i a a 2[096 VM 'A3N SNO1103S SSOFlO - Z 36VHd u O1iA � NOH3H 31NIOd l nos 3nn3AV ONzt slzel �d S� lz- C#�j itl L; A SI 7V 16 R� O ad3�S I a'acl I ro'nl .R avLl f .. � ILI Io:l raa I II IgIUI� e I 1 BALI I I 1 1 LLZL' Q 1 I - - [6111 g e 1 I xx 9'811 B8 b -LII \ BG'BIl Po \ tt-lGt t[0 a \ 9 A� I ppBy \ 1 g; le f'S6 ZSB zQSQ I 4 1 I NJ co I I $ Z - a0f J + B CGffitl B'49 f O 19 D Q 'r,. O 1'ee {QSQj a U 6, 1 I 5(y�l rL[ VJ � a I 4 WWEF- aK ui IL <� a \\\ Dog a Oawl I Gtf �° \ B[C m 3tl0Mtl I � (v 1 9'BS1 �' 1 W 6Kl '^ LTi <B 1Bl I , 11,1 = 1wl BRI CL \ BSCI 9tt1 96'sll � I I iB-<ll i Zcl \ 1 It I 1 I [rn �p� cBn ®� 90t1 I i yyp sal qpy E� �� 6 �n [fLl LYZI tS BR�I p II 82 I Rg Ls l 6 lkpR� DBI I � E I Gal , I I I I e9'tl � BLLI I H OR I I I �Zl YS11 I I E [tll I A I I I Y \ 1 \ yu, 1.. tSt I Qy I I w Qy yn yy g QQ p p p p ' aS/NO69H RLMOd M,oM Bland to ow0 . Bwy a m—• :rem 3tw >e rvors6\3n on SNOUOM SSOUO - Z 3SVHd NO,LNHH �■^ MiY(1 tea, ---- — xa . — .I - .1 ws m tt 1.., alnlB w w e 'ne no rlldW W •d\ro Yt\ ooa lve xs 00W ON SW 3'J8 ONOH3H RAOd 9Zt6-Z9L (90Z) L somas rx3nwaw Nuwms roxixNna om'�wa33a�x3 \w� 'aaxa aML1 .+' B�I .TBI \ 1 \ \ \ I I d I S 00VZ-K186 VM'3ZL1V3S fins I I em xva zete-Isz(sze) aA 1e - I I I 1 II I I I I I I I I I SNOLLO3S SSOHO - Z 3SVHd x A � 3. �2 t3 � Zot 311(18 'HinoS 3f1N3AV At 0909 zZ. eMz(w3r Z ��aa COLI C a X i B'lll aB'La IZII S'Llt 0-1-131iA NOH3H NKM -nos 3nN3nV oNZL slzel oru .101 9r fin fe \\ \ 1 I[B ccs B n BYc ----- -" s QJ�FaW S `` L tiil�j a z 0 1 L't➢1 I gLI U \ SS'[.�9 Y 3rul 4x3d0a W CM C Ni o I s � i py SS 08[01 py II _-( esei iW I i A � BSLI f/1 Wy. 1 r y x pt�1 � \ I Brll oe.a1 1 Qy VJ Cetll i i j � I\ 2 ° r01 Lell i � g R rOZI Ir � q R L 4 I a En ctrl a2tl a a gy 'LII oYl: I I sr'ss pq pq I e le � to 01 rp ZZ oe. oe py N \\\ � g W su N N EiM a cm LSL p # c IK # # d as B.t g3 zi r ol. i� Ir iS/NOLGH 3U\NOd SNOLL03S SSOHO - Z 3SVHd clygM ggqna Iq ruawuoe.p NOIN32i 1l* w 4>e ^' ' �H0 1e Nolsln3a a+ 30 AID L x� ua I B�I .TBI \ 1 \ \ \ I I d I S Bgtl fins I I em [8LI 8CL11 aA 1e - I I I 1 II I I I I I I I I I S4 x A � 3. �2 t3 � 09LI 9L21 ro't01 BLLI COLI 2TII B'lll aB'La IZII S'Llt I'CII C.Y6 \ a \ \ \ \ I oru .101 9r fin fe \\ \ 1 I[B ccs B n BYc (t, ozsue) —1 ".1— ... v p,op-,H moi) io1o9 dVW WV3HIS aNV SCINVI13M ooa+n ON 80f' 3Oe cS/NOU3H 31NOd ,-1,, I it N 9ZI6-Z9L (90Z) N ru Nr m N3 Nex a — �*' 0062 -MM vM '31uv3auos3KnvNa 3TnzCveOAaa6N- ztlacMszs('sIaNzz3A>N�) ZOI �S m a.dbW kHdddJOd01 1 1<OTNOk3H 31NIOd m I° g a - 3ll11 FfOd BVH z e 0. c x NouvnNUN00 60d Z 139HS 33S $ Q ■��u ru ���uuuuu����uuuuuuy���u uu.00.u...... ucau..u....uuuu y EL � I _ e V g- Z'� 8 fP5 e r 3 I -' W w �ua �OZ 1, .y L— tt1�6Q$Q Oz _ CL rj) O\ .n^ ~- a- si Q m 0�3 y m LL COL CL �i fr tiS INi IN, � `h• �I \AAi_ _ \t eS/NOU3-131NIOd 3:d� +c Naisin3e oN db'W AHd` blOOd01 ho cu�x 30 C.LD �° " (VWZI"la)'ou1' 4.poss V a Mapoea..,{.j.3 dVW WV32l1S (INV SUNV113M -oNeor 2.0.8 cS/N083H 3 40cl s;>fms T'.NiRWtlW.3 ':M�:3ntlfE aMon•��.•rf I r SZl6-Z9L (90Z) 0()#Z -KM dM ,@-U 9s xv_ zace-Isz(sze) JVY4 AHdVHJOd01 aoa 3uns 'H.�nos 3nNanV 1Sl 0909 un-Isuszv) Q " UO6 VM 'IN3M Jm c 4i 0-n NOU3H 31NIOd ii ros 3nN3nv ONZ, StM W 4 0=1 L _ c S�YH�O O � >- ro '6�/ o r ' q x ku t 0_ % �•G&� §g Co All ul > � WWFFCI J�� cr Q- ,•-- —qf a�w b a 4 mI c ...........u.. ....c..............t uuc...0 uc.c is ri.uc...... ..uc.oc�i�iic? -0 4 NOLLWHA00 60=1 L 133HS 335 f e cS/NOHBH MNIOd dew kHcJVHD0d0l Noa.Nax 30 AM S3dO-S 3003 NUI08 mq m a38Odaw wm VM •A-uivm a : ms`s a... "'"b aM ww•1w'"`""'••,V ..����'� l l NO a38V8 v3NV 3"WJO- A3a HIMS anN3AV Hm - SLIB rve iALA-Is2car7 •• "r �'-JLLA-ISLISlYI 2L0A6 YM 'IxIM 3tlILM ulvlwd Nota 31NIOd � 071 Molal 3Upd / //r Al pa ;rr'Jrrl 9 r ip If' bp •-- w Y I// � i, In I I li /' e I 6�• �'� l 2 I I i ! CL IIIR1klk m NilI 1 1 to 1 \\\ 11 f l 1 1 I I I. 11 � Lf \ I 11\ \ � wA.IIAI•R 9 A J 11 `I \� I I I I I 1 1 = � ! 1 \ � 'I"`�bll•" ! t L1_'�.1' 11 1\ \ � \ � \ � 4 ; ;'bbl^�•�. `I � 1 I\1111\ 1 I I, \..\ .•:�(,, c"Y`.\\\ ,1 SSI Iywyy � 83dO-S 3Da3 Ninos am a38odotla Baas YM'31uY36 3 4{ '•""• � '�"�"''�''`�` j NO a3W8 Y31V 37BYd0�9a Hinos avmv RM - 9Mrve zua-Ist(Gte LLLV-ISt(SZs1 P a nin:1 A M" N J3H KtWd O77 N0HW 31NIJ�i nope YM 'u1Y a)7.►1 :— 7 NUBS 3nIAAv OxL[ GICBI �/ Isis w �iEf� I I PE335qI \ 141 Il � 51it 4w V EL 5€ " �� _ �, I � �• ti � , y�eee� g� � W I U- 1151, CL i/ I I� I 1 �` P 1I'I rl Hyl tin 1.(i I C-4 I l �q��$! I a 1 \ 1 1•\.4 r,\ I I 7 I I� ! R i t1 9 ( aE �_____ I_ __ I I 1 I@€ 1 ; n z Ill III II I i 1 I II I I&q I qg�' 1/ S I I � �I/ I • - .14 7 A Irl 1 11 I �l .III 1 __ '• i � 11 1 � k 1� ' { I . ' I /r _ -- �L1--I►�1• 11 I\ 11 � mow\ a� `� w � �1 1�._� 1 A � � �'� g r � WW Denis Law City Of WE Ma or June 24, 2016 Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Jimmy Blais Pointe Heron, LLC 5050 1st Ave S, Ste 102 Seattle, WA 98134 SUBJECT: "Final' Notice Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project, LUA15-000039, ECF, SP, MOD Dear Mr. Blais: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the above subject application is expired. According to RMC 4-8-100C.4 — Expiration of Complete Land Use Applications, the application submitted on January 23, 2015 has been inactive for ninety (90) days or more and an administrative decision has not been made and/or has not been reviewed by the Hearing Examiner in a public hearing. According to our records, an "On -Hold" notification (enclosed) was mailed on July 21, 2015, stating that the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) believes that the subject project would likely have a probable significant adverse impact and if the proposal continues to have a probable significant adverse environmental impact, even with mitigation measures, a limited scope EIS would be required. On January 25, 2016, a meeting was held that discussed the future of the site and the project was determined to remain "On -Hold" to allow you adequate time (3 months) to review and respond to the March 9, 2016 "Follow-up" letter (enclosed) or the ERC Memorandum issued on July 1, 2015. As of the date of this letter, the requested information has not been received. Therefore, this is your final notice, if the City of Renton Planning Division does not receive a written request to continue processing the application and the requested information within six (6) months of the date of this letter the application shall be null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 430-7289. Renton City Hall . 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 . rentonwa.gov 9 Sincerely, Clark H. Close Senior Planner Enclosed: "On -Hold" Letter—dated: July 21, 2015 - "Follow-up" Letter—dated: March 9, 2016 cc: Pointe Heron, LLC/ Owner(s) Krom; Stenberg; Olsen; Proctor/ Parties of Record Denis Law Clly Of 'payor v SS r�i, qt Community & Economic Development Department July 21, 2015 C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Jimmy Blais Pointe Heron, LLC 50501st Ave S, Ste 102 Seattle, WA 98134 Subject: "On Hold" Notice Pointe Heron filling, Excavation, and Grading Project, LUA15-000039, ECF, 5P, MOD Dear Mr. Blais: The Planning Division of the City of Renton accepted the above master application for review on May 5, 2015. Pursuant to WAC 197-11-350(2), the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has determined that they are considering a Determination of Significance for the proposed project based on their review on June 29, 2015. The ERC believes that the subject project would likely have a probable significant adverse impact based on the project's size, scope and intensity of the proposed use, which could result in significant impacts to the City streets, surrounding residential neighborhoods, public parks, critical areas and habitat, in addition to views and aesthetics. Also, if the proposal continues to have a probable significant adverse environmental impact, even with mitigation measures, a limited scope EIS would be required. During our July 20, 2015 meeting, you've requested that the project be placed on hold in order allow you adequate time to review and respond to the ERC Memorandum. At this time, your project will be placed "on hold" pending receipt of your comments. Please contact me at (425) 430-7289 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Clark H. Close Associate Planner cc: Pointe Heron, LLC / Owner(s) Kram; Stenberg; Olsen; Proctor/ Parties of Record Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way . Renton,Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Denis LawWw --V,ayor a C1Ly of it J ,s Community & Economic Development Department March 9, 2016 C.E."Chip"Vincent,Administrator Jimmy Blais Pointe Heron, LLC 50501st Ave S, Ste 102 Seattle, WA 98134 Subject: Follow-up Letter to the January 25, 2016 Meeting Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project, LUA15-000039, ECF, SP, MOD Dear Mr. Blais: Thank you for meeting with City Staff on January 25, 2016 to discuss the future of the Pointe Heron site. To recap the meeting, two (2) options were presented regarding the Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project. They were as follows: Option 1) proceed with the subject project using secondary geotechnical review rather than EIS process; or Option 2) rezone the site back to the 2010 multi -family residential zoning designation. On March 7, 2015 the ERC committee met and completed a preliminary review of Options 1 & 2 following an initial discussion at the administrative level. During this committee meeting, the ERC determined that they are still considering a Determination of Significance (DS) for the proposed project under the current proposal to create a new 1.5H: IV engineered fill slope along a portion of the south edge of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel. The ERC still believes that the subject project would likely have a probable significant adverse impact based on the project's size, scope and intensity of the proposed use, which could result in significant impacts to the City streets, surrounding residential neighborhoods, public parks, critical areas and habitat, views, and aesthetics. However, the ERC would consider allowing the project to proceed under secondary geotechnical review and a determination of non -significance — mitigated (DNS -M) based on a successful redesign of the slope to less than 40 percent (40%) along the hillside. In consideration of a redesign, the Geotechnical Engineer should analyze additional alternatives to the proposed un -vegetated buttress fill in order to consider reducing the adverse environmental impacts of the slope. Additional analysis should be reflected through an update to the submitted Geotechnical Report and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist. Renton City Hall . 1055 South Grady Way . Rentor., Washington 98057 . rentonwa.gov LUA15-000039, ECF, SP, V-A, MOD Page 2 of 2 March 9, 2016 With regards to the possibility of a rezone, or Option 2, the City would be unable to support a rezone of the property back to residential zoning district due to the inherent conflicts and frictions between industrial uses and nonindustrial uses. This letter serves as a response to your request made on January 25, 2016 and shall not be construed as a determination of significance (DS). Likewise, the preliminary discussion of clarification or changes to a proposal shall not bind the lead agency to a determination of nonsignificance—mitigated (DNS -M). The project will remain on hold to allow you adequate time to review and respond to either this letter and/or the ERC Memorandum issued on July 1, 2015. Your response should be submitted within three (3) months of date of this letter so that we may continue the review ofthe above subject application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7289 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Clark H. Close Senior Planner cc: Pointe Heron L• C, Owneris) David Halinen, Attorney at Law Krom; Stenberg; Proctor; Olsen, Parties of Record LUA15-000039 He Denis Law City of/-I [ I. J-✓- � �tO•C, EEj a; Community & Economic Development Department March 9, 2016 C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Jimmy Blais Pointe Heron, LLC 5050 1st Ave S, Ste 102 Seattle, WA 98134 Subject: Follow-up Letter to the January 25, 2016 Meeting Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project, LUA15-000039, ECF, SP, MOD Dear Mr. Blais Thank you for meeting with City Staff on January 25, 2016 to discuss the future of the Pointe Heron site. To recap the meeting, two (2) options were presented regarding the Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project. They were as follows: Option 1) proceed with the subject project using secondary geotechnical review rather than EIS process; or Option 2) rezone the site back to the 2010 multi -family residential zoning designation. On March 7, 2015 the ERC committee met and completed a preliminary review of Options 1 & 2 following an initial discussion at the administrative level. During this committee meeting, the ERC determined that they are still considering a Determination of Significance (DS) for the proposed project under the current proposal to create a new 1.5H:1V engineered fill slope along a portion of the south edge of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel. The ERC still believes that the subject project would likely have a probable significant adverse impact based on the project's size, scope and intensity of the proposed use, which could result in significant impacts to the City streets, surrounding residential neighborhoods, public parks, critical areas and habitat, views, and aesthetics. However, the ERC would consider allowing the project to proceed under secondary geotechnical review and a determination of non -significance — mitigated (DNS -M) based on a successful redesign of the slope to less than 40 percent (40%) along the hillside. In consideration of a redesign, the Geotechnical Engineer should analyze additional alternatives to the proposed un -vegetated buttress fill in order to consider reducing the adverse environmental impacts of the slope. Additional analysis should be reflected through an update to the submitted Geotechnical Report and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist. Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov LUA15-000039, ECF, SP, V-A, D Page 2 of 2 March 9, 2016 With regards to the possibility of a rezone, or Option 2, the City would be unable to support a rezone of the property back to residential zoning district due to the inherent conflicts and frictions between industrial uses and nonindustrial uses. This letter serves as a response to your request made on January 25, 2016 and shall not be construed as a determination of significance (DS). Likewise, the preliminary discussion of clarification or changes to a proposal shall not bind the lead agency to a determination of nonsignificance — mitigated (DNS -M). The project will remain on hold to allow you adequate time to review and respond to either this letter and/or the ERC Memorandum issued on July 1, 2015. Your response should be submitted within three (3) months of date of this letter so that we may continue the review of the above subject application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7289 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Clark H. Close Senior Planner cc: Pointe Heron LLC, Owner(s) David Halinen, Attorney at Law Kram; Stenberg; Proctor; Olsen, Parties of Record LUA15-000039 File Denis Law — City Of, tt IL Ma or � �'a���J�J � �� ��1� � E � `'r',C•? Community & Economic Development Department July 21, 2015 C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Jimmy Blais Pointe Heron, LLC 5050 1st Ave S, Ste 102 Seattle, WA 98134 Subject: "On Hold" Notice Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project, LUA15-000039, ECF, SP, MOD Dear Mr. Blais: The Planning Division of the City of Renton accepted the above master application for review on May 5, 2015. Pursuant to WAC 197-11-350(2), the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has determined that they are considering a Determination of Significance for the proposed project based on their review on June 29, 2015. The ERC believes that the subject project would likely have a probable significant adverse impact based on the project's size, scope and intensity of the proposed use, which could result in significant impacts to the City streets, surrounding residential neighborhoods, public parks, critical areas and habitat, in addition to views and aesthetics. Also, if the proposal continues to have a probable significant adverse environmental impact, even with mitigation measures, a limited scope EIS would be required. During our July 20, 2015 meeting, you've requested that the project be placed on hold in order allow you adequate time to review and respond to the ERC Memorandum. At this time, your project will be placed "on hold" pending receipt of your comments. Please contact me at (425) 430-7289 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Clark H. Close Associate Planner cc: Pointe Heron, LLC / Ownerls) Krom; Stenberg; Olsen; Proctor / Parties of Record Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Denis Law Mayor City of, I 4 j ��rr,, a `.\ ,'; 1.. � ! r' ( Community & Economic Development Department July 1, 2015 C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Mr. Jimmy Blais Pointe Heron, LLC 5050 1st Avenue South, Ste 102 Seattle, WA 98134 RE; Consideration of Environmental (SEPA) Threshold Determination of Significance (DS) Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project, LUA15-000039, ECF, SP, V-A, MOD Dear Mr. Blais: On May 28, 2105, David Halinen on behalf of Pointe Heron LLC, requested early notice under WAC 197-11-350(2) prior to the lead agency's threshold determination on your proposed Special Grade and Fill Permit. This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), pursuant to WAC 197-11-350(2), in response to your request to ask the lead agency to indicate whether it is considering a Determination of Significance (DS). On June 29, 2015 the ERC committee met and completed a preliminary review of the subject project. During this committee meeting, the ERC has determined that they are considering a Determination of Significance (DS) for the proposed project. The ERC belives that the subject project would likely have a probable significant adverse impact based on the project's size, scope and intensity of the proposed use, which could result in significant impacts to the City streets, surrounding residential neighborhoods, public parks, critical areas and habitat, in addition to views and aesthetics. If the proposal continues to have a probable significant adverse environmental impact, even with mitigation measures, an EIS shall be prepared. A copy of the ERC Memorandum, listing the environmental issues of concerns, is enclosed. This letter serves as a response to your request for early notice under WAC 197-11-350(2) and shall not be construed as a determination of significance (DS). Likewise, the preliminary discussion of clarification or changes to a proposal shall not bind the lead agency to a mitigated determination of nonsignificance (M -DNS). If you have any questions, please contact Clark Close, Associate Planner, CED Planning Division at (425)430-7289. For the Environmental Review Committee, Gregg A. Zimmerman, P.E. City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Chair Public Works Department Administrator Enclosure cc: Pointe Heron LLC, Owner(s) David Halinen, Attorney at Law Krom; Stenberg; Proctor; Olsen, Parties of Record LUA15-000039 File Renton City Hall . 1055 South Grady Way . Renton, Washington 98057 . rentonwa.gov DeMasLaw City of v _I Community & Economic Development Department July 1, 2015 GE."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Mr. Jimmy Slais Pointe Heron, LLC 5050 1st Avenue South, Ste 102 Seattle, WA 98134 RE: Consideration of Environmental (SEPA) Threshold Determination of Significance (DS) Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project, LUA15-000039, ECF, SP, V-A, MOD Dear Mr. Olais: On May 28, 2105, David Halinen on behalf of Pointe Heron LLC, requested early notice under WAC 197-11-350(2) prior to the lead agency's threshold determination on your proposed Special Grade and Fill Permit. This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), pursuant to WAC 197-11-350(2), in response to your request to ask the lead agency to indicate whether it is considering a Determination of Significance (DS). On June 29, 2015 the ERC committee met and completed a preliminary review of the subject project. During this committee meeting, the ERC has determined that they are considering a Determination of Significance (DS) for the proposed project. The ERC believes that the subject project would likely have a probable significant adverse impact based on the project's size, scope and intensity of the proposed use, which could result in significant impacts to the City streets, surrounding residential neighborhoods, public parks, critical areas and habitat, in addition to views and aesthetics. If the proposal continues to have a probable significant adverse environmental impact, even with mitigation measures, an EIS shall be prepared. A copy of the ERC Memorandum, listing the environmental issues of concerns, is enclosed. This letter serves as a response to your request for early notice under WAC 197-11-350(2) and shall not be construed as a determination of significance (DS). Likewise, the preliminary discussion of clarification or changes to a proposal shall not bind the lead agency to a mitigated determination of nonsignificance (M -DNS). If you have any questions, please contact Clark H. Close, Associate Planner, CED— Planning Division at(425)430-7289. For the Environmental Review Committee, Gregg A. Zimmerman, P.E. City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Chair Public Works Department Administrator Pnlnte. Heron LIC, Owner(s) David Hatinen, Attorney at I.aw Krom; Stenberg; Proctor; Olsen, Paroles of Record WAIS-uDu039 File Renton City Hall • 1055 South GradyWay • Renton, Wash i ngton 98057 • remmnwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY p o""'°f AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT — r wrt M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 29, 2015 TO: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) FROM: Clark H. Close, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project LUA15-000039, ECF, SP, V-A, MOD This memorandum is intended to provide the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) with a short project description and staffs recommendation for an Environmental Determination for the subject project. Pursuant to Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-11-350, the applicant is requesting that the lead agency indicate whether it is considering a Determination of Significance (DS). This WAC section allows for clarifications or changes to a proposal prior to making the threshold determination, following the submittal of an environmental checklist and prior to the lead agency's threshold determination on a proposal. If the lead agency indicates a DS is likely, the applicant may clarify or change features of the proposal to mitigate the impacts which led the agency to consider a DS likely. It would then be the applicant's responsibility to revise the environmental checklist to describe the clarifications or changes. The lead agency would then make a threshold determination based upon the changed or clarified proposal. If a proposal continues to have a probable significant adverse environmental impact, even with mitigation measures, an EIS shall be prepared. Exhibits Exhibit 1 ERC Memorandum Exhibit 2 Pointe Heron LLC Parcel Exhibit 3 Project Site Work Area Limits Exhibit 4 Site Plan Exhibit 5 Clearing, initial Grading and TESC Plan with Road Cross Sections Exhibit 6 Topography Map Exhibit 7 1.5H:1V Schematic Fill Slope Detail Exhibit 8 Renton (COR) Maps Sensitive Areas: Slopes Exhibit 9 Pointe Heron LLC Preliminary Future Developable Area based on proposed 2.5H:1V south edge slopes Exhibit 10 Pointe Heron LLC Preliminary Future Developable Area based on proposed 1.5H:1V south edge slopes LUA15-000039, ECF, SP, V-A, MOD Page 2 of 8 June 29, 2015 Prosect Narrative The applicant is requesting a Fill and Grade Permit, SEPA Environmental Review, a Variance or Modification to create a protected slope at 1101 SW Sunset Blvd, also known as the Sunset Bluff property (Exhibit 2). The project site (work area limits) is roughly 14.12 acres and was previously graded as part of the originally planned Sunset Bluff Residential Subdivision (Exhibits 3 & 4). The overall parcel totals 26.26 acres. The parcel is zoned Light Industrial (LI). Construction access to the project will be through the Stoneway Black River Quarry property at 510 Monster Road SW. First, the project would fill the existing stormwater pond near the south edge of the site and create a new 1.5H:1V (67%) engineered fill slope along a portion of the south edge of the parcel in order to achieve a continuous top of slope elevation of approximately 128 feet (Exhibit 5). Second, the project would excavate and construct a new 1.90 -acre permanent stormwater pond closer to SW Sunset Blvd (i.e. the top of the new slope). The project will involve a net fill of 477,300 cubic yards. No wetlands or streams exist within the project development portion of the site (work area limits). However, there are two Category 3 wetlands on the overall parcel along the south property line. Wetland A is a 258 SF wetland near the southwest corner of the parcel and Wetland B is a 6,078 SF wetland located just east of the project area. There is also an unnamed Class 4 stream that flows into Wetland B, approximately 100 feet west of the project area (Exhibit 6). The site is located near the Black River Riparian Forest, which contains critical habitat, a stream and wetlands that are located in the Shoreline Jurisdiction with an Environmental Designation of Natural (the most sensitive designation in the Shoreline Master Program (SMP). The site also contains geological hazards including steep slopes, landslide hazards and erosion hazards. The applicant submitted a Geotechnical and Soil Engineering Report, a Wetland & Stream Delineation, a Technical Information Report, and 2014 Great Blue Heron & Wildlife Habitat Report. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable significant impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Identify that they are likely to Issue a Determination of Significance (DS) Staff anticipates that the subject project may have a probable significant impact based on the project's size, scope and intensity of the proposed use, which could result in significant impacts to the City streets, surrounding residential neighborhoods, public parks, critical areas and habitat, in addition to views and aesthetics. The proposed development would have varying degrees of the following environmental issues as listed below and described further in the remainder of the memorandum: LUA15-000039, ECF, SP, V-A, M00 Page 3 of 8 June 29, 2015 1. Scale/Intensity and the amount of fill identified in the Geotechnical Report; 2. Geotechnical Critical Areas including steep slopes (creation of a protected slope greater than 40%), erosion, and landslide hazards; 3. Proximity to Sensitive Areas and Open Space (Black River Riparian Forest); which includes but is not limited to critical habitat, Category 1 wetlands, Springbrook Creek (a Shoreline of the State); 4. Type and quality of fill material used; 5. Transportation impacts; 6. Noise; and 7. Proximity to a proposed regional trail (Lake to Sound). 1. Scale/Intensity and the amount of fill identified in the Geotechnical Report The project would involve approximately 495,500 cubic yards of fill and approximately 18,200 cubic yards of cut, for a net volume of approximately 477,300 cubic yards of structural fill materials to be imported. The imported fill materials would be hauled into the project site either from stockpiles of structural fill materials stored on the Stoneway Black River Quarry property (property that abuts the parcel) or through the Quarry's entrance roadway on Monster Rd SW. The proposed work would be done in two phases. Phase 1 involves filling the existing stormwater detention and water quality pond located near the site's south boundary and filling the adjacent areas of the project site in order to raise site grades to an interim elevation of approximately 110 feet. Phase 1 would also include the construction of a new interim detention and water quality pond. The lower portion of an engineered 1.5H to 1V fill slope (up to an elevation of approximately 111 feet) would be constructed along the south side of the site over the existing pond and would close the gap between the existing engineered fill slopes along the south edge of the site. Phase 1 work would involve 267,000 cubic yards of fill. During Phase 2, a stormwater pond would be excavated from a segment of the northern portion of the existing plateau near S.W. Sunset Blvd (S.R. 900). Phase 1 interim detention pond would be filled to final grade and the upper portion of the engineered fill slope would be completed. The remainder of the project site would be filled to final grade, ranging from 125 to 128 feet. Phase 2 would involve approximately 18,200 cubic yards of excavation and approximately 228,500 cubic yards of fill for a net fill of roughly 210,000 cubic yards. Also shown on the grading plans, is a new 2.6H:1V engineered fill slope proposed along a portion of the project's west edge. The proposed buttress fill slope face is described in the Geotechnical and Soil Engineering Report prepared by Earth Solutions NW, LLC (dated August 13, 2014) as a crushed aggregate buttress fill along the slope face that would taper in horizontal depth from a 35 -foot depth at the toe of the proposed new 1.51-1:1V (67%) engineered fill slope tapering to a 5 -foot depth at the top of the slope designed to provide slope stability and prevent slope erosion, provide a porous, nonerosive aggregate facing of the proposed LUA15-000039, ECF, SP, V-A, MOD Page 4 of 8 June 29, 2015 slope face (Exhibit 7). The fill material is equivalent to coarse gravel and/or cobble, well - graded and angular (crushed). A geogrid reinforcement would be used to further increase slope strength and stability. 2. Geotechnical Critical Areas including steep slopes Based on RMC 4-3-050J, steep slopes, potential landslide hazard areas, seismic hazards, and potential erosion hazards are present on the subject parcel and/or within about 300 feet of the project site. The parcel contains four areas of protected slopes (approx. 78,008 sf), generally located on the east portion of the parcel (Exhibit 3). The City of Renton (COR) Map indicates slopes from 15% to 35% across nearly the entire proposed project site and also indicates some small areas of sensitive steep slopes, primarily in the western half of the project site (Exhibit 8) The proposed project site currently consists of already -graded and sloped areas such as, a geogrid-reinforced ecology block retaining wall up to about 16 feet in height along the north, west, and northeast edge of the existing Sunset Bluff stormwater pond located near the central portion of the south boundary of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel. Above the ecology block wall, there is an approximately 2H:1V (50%) engineered fill slope. At the top of the slope, the site has been graded to be general flat with a substantial depth of crushed material. The site has been graded with varying slopes (Exhibit 5). The proposed fill, excavation, and grading project would raise grades to an approximate pad elevation of 125 to 128 feet in order to generally match the existing top -of -slope elevation of the existing structural fill at the easternmost end of the proposed work area and increase the area of the existing plateau portion of the project site from 5.47 acres (slope of 2.5H:1V (40%)) to 7.35 acres (Exhibit 9). The applicant has submitted a modification and variance in order to increase the developable area (or plateau area) of the lot by creating a 1.5H:1V (67%) engineered fill slope. Approval of the requested variance (or modification) would increase the plateau area by 1.88 acres (Exhibit 10). By comparison, the results of a shallower slope (40%) would increase the area of the hillside (south edge fill slope area) by roughly 2 acres. The design of the buttress fill slope face would vertically transmit and disperse rainwater and hillside perched groundwater through the crushed aggregate buttress zone. No vegetation of the face of the slope would be conducive to landscaping or hydroseedingl. Lack of vegetation, from the edge of the top of the slope or on the face of the slope would serve to maintain or reestablish a greenbelt which would provide a buffer between the slope face and reduce erosion. Protective control measures for the faces of the relatively small areas of cut slopes may consist of effective planting, protective covering such as plastic sheets, and interceptor trenches equipped with check dams, to divert water in such a way that it minimizes erosion potential. I The maximum slope to be considered for vegetative stabilization is 1.5 horizontal to 1 vertical (1.5H:1 V). LUA15-000039, ECF, SP, V-A, MOD Page 5 of 8 June 29, 2015 3. Proximity to Sensitive Areas and Open Space (Black River Riparian Forest) The project site is located approximately 100 feet north of the Black River Riparian property. The applicant completed a memorandum, titled 2014 Great Blue Heron & Wildlife Habitat Update for the QIP/Sunset Bluff (MLDC) Properties (now owned by Pointe Heron LLC) prepared by Raedeke Associates (dated August 13, 2014). The purpose of the investigation was to evaluate current wildlife use and habitat conditions within the study area, as well as evaluate the historical mapped sites of the great blue heron colony and bald eagle nests in the vicinity, as an update to a previous Wildlife Reconnaissance report completed on February 2, 2009. Following site visits to the study area on April 16, 18, and 19, 2013 and on April 16, 2014, Raedeke Associates, Inc. documented wildlife presence, sign, and habitat, and plant communities. The study area included the QIP Property (which is the three easterly parcels of the Black River Quarry site), the MLDC Property (Pointe Heron site "work area limits"), the Virtu Property (vacant triangular area in the southeast corner of the existing Sunset View Apartments complex), and the Black River Riparian Forest (BRRF), located south of the BNSF railroad right-of-way. The current Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW 2014) online database map depicts the area just south of the project site as a "biodiversity and corridor" area. The bald eagle nest located in the BRRF was located approximately 1,100 feet south of the project site. The other nest in this territory is located approximately 2,600 feet west of the current grade and fill project site. Nesting at one or the other of the two nest trees occurred between 2005 and 2008. The nest in the BRRF was reported to have fallen out of the tree in 2010. The great blue heron established a colony in the BRRF in 1985. The colony increased from approximately eight nesting pairs in the mind 1980s to a maximum of approximately 140 in 2006. Since then the colony has declined progressively, most likely due to chronic predation by a pair of nesting bald eagles. Based on the site visit conducted by Raedeke Associates, Inc. it appeared that that the heron abandoned the former colony site and no nesting activity appears to have taken place since 2011. Thus, based on their observations and information available, the BRRF heron colony is no longer present and the WDFW no longer conducts annual monitoring of heron colonies and bald eagle nests with no reports of herons nesting in the former BRRF colony since 2011. According to Herons Forever, a Puget Sound -based all - volunteer nonprofit organization, scientists recommend that there should be no development within 1,000 feet of the near edge of a heron colony and no disturbance in or near colonies from January 15 to August 1. Each colony has its own specific needs based on its location and the unique dynamics of the heron community (www.herons.circaconsulting.com). It is unclear if Wetland B and the unnamed stream tributary to Wetland B and their respective buffers are hydraulically connected to the wetlands in the Black River Riparian Forest and thus subject to the City's shoreline jurisdiction (including the 150- LUA15-000039, ECF, SP, V-A, MOD Page 6 of 8 June 29, 2015 foot buffer for Wetland B). The closest working limits of the project site are proposed to be roughly 193 feet from Wetland B and 100 feet from the unnamed stream tributary. Therefore, the proposed fill, excavation and grading project would avoid direct filling or grading within Wetland A and B, the off-site BRRF wetlands, the unnamed tributary stream to Wetland B, and their respective buffers. The limited scope EIS (supplemental information provided by the applicant) should be evaluated as to whether these wetlands are hydraulically connected to the Black River Riparian Forest complex (within Shoreline Jurisdiction). 4. Type and quality of fill material used The Geotechnical and Soil Engineering Report prepared by Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) (dated August 13, 2014) describes the fill material specification for the proposed fill in two categories: 1) a crushed aggregate fill used to construct a buttress fill zone along the face of the proposed fill slopes and 2) a fill used to construct the proposed fill core behind the crushed aggregate fill zone (Exhibit 7). The fill material would be subject to RMC 4-4-060N.4. The applicant is proposing the following materials to be used to construct the buttress fill zone along the face of the proposed fill slopes with the following strength parameters: Internal angle of fraction 46 degrees minimum Moist unit weight 145 pcf minimum Maximum aggregate size 8 inches Maximum fines content shall not exceed 5 percent. The specified material, which is equivalent to coarse gravel and/or cobble, would be well -graded and angular (crushed) Material to be used to construct the proposed fill core to be placed behind the crushed aggregate buttress zone fill would conform to the following strength parameters: Internal angle of fraction 36degrees minimum Moist unit weight 125 pcf minimum Maximum aggregate size 8 inches Maximum fines content shall not exceed 20 percent. Samples of this proposed fill material would be provided to ESNW for laboratory analysis and/or sieve analysis testing for approval prior to placement. The proposed buttress fill material and the proposed core structural fill material would be placed in maximum 12 -inch loose lifts and compacted to a firm and unyielding condition or a relative compaction of 95%. Given the location of the buttress fill, the project's design grades would create a protected slope that may result in increased landslide hazards. The type of fill material proposed is very specific and only includes a single specification by which to construct a protected slope at 1.5H:1V (67%). The proposed project should consider alternative materials used for structural fill that would support a planted or vegetative slope. The proposed design details one end of the spectrum by raising and LUA15-000039, ECF, SP, V-A, MOD Page 7 of 8 June 29, 2015 extending the hillside closer to BRRF without providing alternatives (such as different slope treatments), balance or mitigation measures to reduce risk or aesthetic impacts created by constructing a 67% slope. S. Transportation Impacts The new road will encourage increased development in the area because of the improved access (an indirect impact). In addition, the earthwork equipment, dump trucks, water truck, and workers' automobiles operated during construction would generate an estimated 350 inbound and 350 outbound haul truck trips on peak hauling days. All trucks and equipment would use the Black River Quarry entrance and exit off Monster Road SW. The proposed starting date for filling, excavation and grading work was identified in the application as March 2015. October 2016 or October 2017 was listed as the end date of the construction. No measures were identified to reduce or control transportation impacts. These elements shall be addressed as part of a limited scope EIS. 6. Noise The construction activity anticipated with the fill and grade work is anticipated to create a significant amount of truck trips and noise for an extended period of time (potentially 32 months). The project is located near Sunset View Apartments and Sunpointe Townhomes. The maximum permissible environmental noise levels would be subject to Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-60-040. 7. Proximity to a proposed regional trail (Lake to Sound) A portion of the Lake to Sound Trail follows the railroad tracks through the City of Renton and is located south of the BNSF railroad. The trail passes between the Pointe Heron LLC site and the forested canopy of the BRRF, a City of Renton -owned park and wildlife refuge with a diverse ecosystem. The proposed trail system is intended to be a regional multi -model transportation trail that is intended to support both local users and regional bike commuter traffic. Under current conditions the human presence in this portion of the park is limited in nature; however, after the completion of the Lake to Sound Trail the number of pedestrians anticipated to be utilizing this portion of the park would significantly increase. The trail would offer users a separation from the urban landscape while still making the important connections among employment, retail, and residential areas. The proposed project's design grades would create a protected slope that may result in an increased landslide hazards. Should the proposed slope slide, the run out is expected to cross the proposed regional commuter trail. Furthermore, a 67% un -vegetative slope would result in an aesthetic impact to the surrounding area. This created slope not only has the potential to enlarge landslide hazards (heavy rains have caused slides from the Pointe Heron site to the BRRF site in the past), but escalate erosion hazards, and/or increase runoff and contaminants from the development which could add to the LUA15-000039, ECF, SP, V-A, MOD Page 8 of 8 June 29, 2015 volumes and levels of contamination downhill from the Pointe Heron site. In addition, to negatively impacting pedestrians using the regional trail, a slide would negative impact the BNSF railroad line that serves commerce and the region. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the applicant prepare a limited scope environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Pointe Heron LLC project to the Environmental Review Committee (ERC). The limited scope EIS should include a range of alternatives, address the seven issues or areas of impact identified above (in addition to any additional areas identified in the EIS scoping process), and provide potential mitigation measures. The EIS process would provide opportunities for the public, agencies and tribes to participate in developing and analyzing the proposal and would allow City Staff the opportunity to fully understand the impacts of the proposed project including an evaluation of alternatives. Based on the adopted SEPA policies and the resulting information from the EIS, staff would be able to make an informed recommendation to the Hearing Examiner on the requested variance for the proposed 1.5H:1V engineered fill slope along a portion of the south edge of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel (APN 132304-9010). Note to ERC: If the ERC indicated that a DS "appears likely' this shall not be construed an official Determination of Significance. Likewise, the preliminary discussion of clarification or changes to a proposal shall not bind the lead agency to a mitigated DNS. w (j) z CL z 0 F- F - I r w z Cl) w w CI z w F - z d, z 0 0 I F - w w fV Jr w 0 0 ON083H 31NOd t AF 921e-z9z (90z) 99 SNV'ld NOIVJJ-16VH3U QNV ootre-VM6 vm,a-uv�ls MIU31NI M 3BnS 'HInOS anN3AV 1510909 '!DNIaVb'O -.L3aHS U3A03 O -M NO83H 31NIOd uj J Lu ca Z -bamm 'ON SW 908 '*,,�*4 t AF 99 A "s is uj J Z -bamm 'ON SW 908 '*,,�*4 AF 99 "s is uj J CL Id Z -bamm 'ON SW 908 '*,,�*4 AF 99 is .o Z* SM089H 31NIOJ SNV,1.j NOLLVInIeVH38 GNV .............. S'a'3E)VNIV140 M91NICM} Ao U13 'Ooe-.1 FA ON,ICIV80 - 133HS 89AOO zwll � t ........... .. .. ..... ............ .. ......... I.. - V, is Id .o Z* SM089H 31NIOJ SNV,1.j NOLLVInIeVH38 GNV .............. S'a'3E)VNIV140 M91NICM} Ao U13 'Ooe-.1 FA ON,ICIV80 - 133HS 89AOO zwll � t ........... .. .. ..... ............ .. ......... I.. - V, NV-ld DiIS W 0 a: CL Z co C) 0 cr- Z- Z oZ O R �- P Lu (n 0 W w Z LL 0 Z 0 a - z 0 M W w Z 0 a_ ----- — .1 -.— . oort4 'ON 80(''3'0'8 gzt6-z9L (90z) 00t,Z-KU6 VM'3-LLLV3S zot aunsuirios 3mN3AV 1St 0909 0-n N089H 31N )d g s3'L �W� s wm3m—vm '�—. RUWI MIMAIDW IW xv: L 4U7 :UO=l Q z Wil il z PON g PON Kai!/ El -w LWI x C) Lj to 6 rS C) Df ( I— b z =6n-18 ASNns NV -IJ 0S3L CNV bNKN6gD IVLLA/ 4JNILIV3IO ecse..-s 9 , -,s w « ,� x n wraePo « w x_e sne• aW ecsn'roseovn ,, Te 'ON BOr '3'08 SZl6—Z9L (90Z) snaaa,aowouwa �wwns �>w'•"+,, ° •srrwe aY�Y •�NomNmu ,uo , o�, 80196 VM '3ILLV36 XV! ZBLH—LSZ(SZY) �X Hlf)OS 3(1N3AV HL01 SM6 zzze-2z(szr) o EE '3M''00 . N3YVd0-rAA_3O CNVI ONrk91V zcoec vM 'uu,1 a!D Z o H1f10S 3f1N3AV ONZL SllBl µ. UOJ nVH� rz m .Y� . y rerr r � nnrrt, PIP 7.. tl2 <x� x_ ! itiYi•'I' a r !'/'' 1$%��''� p � t lily• jl � .t(!�, i/� „+�' h:� ;�,�'�w'pi�Q, ,5ti�;��, r,I ,I,�� ns e r X118 L3SNf1S ww `aa °°W,.ww''ZZ ee.,m a0 .•.... aadv 31xa .�e aosMaa 'on NVId OS3.L CNV ISO LAI3iI 'a — °1 ` ash" c — 'ONIOVU0 IVWNI 10"HV310 30 x1l 109-1 —00---- —t oY m sa —saw raroo nms mam maoYm anM�s _ Ti SDBZ/LB/IS .......... pax i-wav a ... Irv, .xzaon. w-sro:�wv„�s,�o�sc3q•000<o;e h., l'6£9L ON SOf X309 4 -An -M 13SNnS NV7d 0831 (INV bNOVM 1VWNI 'JNIHV3-10 31111 QCOL- cx� J CL U� 3 W v Z Q N Z3 L) s /�. Qcr F 3 _j N Qa .Ar/ i, "'A 9Zt6-Z9L (90Z) 90196 VM '3ZLLV3S Huns Em3AV HIM 9Zt6 'ONI ''OO 1Navuo-13A3O 4NV"1 ONf1a vi 9]WOS WIN3NNOaWi3'DNI nS AM=DM. D4jl� 'OMWd 0M'1 '5wmN&Q IM o a xvi mR-isz(azr) it zzzs-isz'IN �� ; ZfOB6 YM '1N3M H1OOS 3nNW ONZL SLZ91 �nrHQ� O j / gu. a� O a o 1 £I ddn� J 3SrN1S �vw• !wvr !wed/sr!ve"ad r.�•ww, nso D ro p ------ aam 3 va e---Noisvaa oN �avo ..+.M =.e/b�!..va =.n,ro � �=� ___°0 •,.,,mT L eu, m __ w.xau Noixn do uu need �_ NV'ld OS31 ONV NOLN�?I - - -- - --- --- - H P m - _„ - __ su3wm aoum s up and z ,• 'F�NIOVaC) IVWN bNk V33O 30 AID �itl .�_,t- --- m _• „ c o Baa n --- san rmw ww�s momT ma- L- --- , x rlolnoxv .1 -.11- m and•I9L/n/9�.wV•P9 6.cn6.-aoz9nua: sNaozn�•oaml\:e:.0 p6-4 ON 60r -3'O'8 s8/NOU3H 31NKM sxlwas ru+3.--'0r9136tlf6a.swox�xrz 4216-Z9L (906) ox»,.0 IW '� ,w, g OObZ-KM M VM `3ZLLV3S xVi zgcg-IgZ(sz+) ^ v1. w J Zol 3Lf1S `Hinos 3nN3AV 151 040S zZZs- SZ(sza) Z g 4 99 SNOLLO3S SSOFl3 - Z 3SVHd O Tl NOFJ3H 31NIOd Z2096 VM '12 eke d NIMS 3nN3AV (INU slzgl ��VH�O 4 :31.1J1 kiO3 • LL91 f B� 0 s il V 31� ESSI Or051 I t � �6Z11 s I I g I 11 - crlll a zal $ - --. \\...if .-.. .ILI LLI l w ll aI IOL In— co K a s9 rcol d \ E fi scwl $ I I asa gg R 771I�� D�s O IS a Wp11' L \ J r 6x Z5� Wrz9t co co It V) u5S6 1 is ef. 1Q� LU e o CV\ 9L91 \ Q \ 1 I,I = 1 e'stl CL 9xl I I z QQB 9" $a 6LLI 96911 I 9'oa I �� o6L1 I a � I 6<I1 ' 9L511 d I 9511 Qy rrll 1 Y + ettl Z x � . m \ O 9601 a \ i sSMOLgH 31NIOd ...... «.,. adm aim .le xorsln3aON SNMOM 88060 - Z 3SVHd NOINHU 30 ID \ I ........ 9191 I I 1 ' I I I .691 9a1 9Ltl 9,t1 `tel 1 I I I I \ I I I I \ � I 1 ral c6z1 �� fl m I Z-LLI .a 1 g 0 9 ell a I I I I I I I I I orl l AAFF 9�LI C9M Ofzl I 1 � � 91l 1 69 sow _ � O 8 8 I 009 L6169 \ \ I 9891 I I \ L i91 9191 9st1 . F I I I BISII 91Z1 ll tnl I Lral a I I I I I I I I I AAFF 9�LI Ofzl NB901 I I Ye _ � O 8 8 oz6 L6169 \ \ I [BS C'SC -- — Na 1— .1 .1— N..:" OOZq) ON 60f 30'B � 3N1 BS/NOH3H 31MO4 9Z[6-Z9L (90Z) 3 VflBNN3NNatlNNi'aNANNS JNINNV aW 'ONW3NDNB 1Wa a�WaN3pMI' o ^ p4 1 d I I eoel I d- I a I I \ I I I I I , I I� dq lAJ � U) � a 24 yJ� 3 g �sLsl sl �l OOVZ-KM VA4 'Tulv3S 6..1 XVJ Z9C9-LSZ(SZ4) m ¢ E a ZOI aims I-LmS BnN3AV ISI 09M Y _ - zzze-Lsz(sza) ZfOB6 VM 't 1 K SNOLLO3S SSOHO - Z 3SVHd g tl I I I I I I I I a 0-n NOH3H 31NOd �LLu ���9 �em� 1 \ N1f105 3f1N3hV GNUSIZBI Z81 q'A M wEp 9p �3�111 1t11 SO.eCb G Z. :HOd \ I .181 9['GB \ tle I 1 d,* ^ ME e'.0 tE a �a� O e p UPI L cr dw O µp�I�0 �� w h 9 rJ Z� fl g A t $ $ @ n A $ A \ `\. ZtB1 ' 3n U AlmdON w =191 C0 �%i a 9 OO 4 Z f YI tld g g x 9L1 t 3 V. 1 SLI NC_. 1.. Bt' l W \ I � fiGl q�1 911 "611 9g LCL 6 I tl [b� I az11 �� � \ fifiEf 9za1 g I ers 980 py yy Qy \\\ ygSg�Q k 999 b b b 5 d 0. e8r[C F # F 9. — sS/NOH3H 3JNKM SNOLL03S SSOHO - Z 3SVHd s1�oM o9Wd {o IwwLod9a NOLLNHH 30 i,LIO `�• Nf1lVa .� p� �. pdev Siva G.e NO—. ON � 3N1 I 9 181 w 1 688 1 d I I eoel I d- I a I I \ I I I I I , I I� dq lAJ � U) � a 24 yJ� 3 g �sLsl sl �l s9z1 eeml 9Z1 6..1 «q rSl1 E 911 crm a Y _ - � fis"m 1 9221 IB 101 g tl I I I I I I I I a � g NgR �LLu ���9 �em� 1 \ C BS z1n q'A M wEp 9p 3Ba 1t11 SO.eCb G Z. \ \ ZO t1 xa ' 1 d I I eoel at1 \ l 1 I I d 6..1 Z�1rl Po"ELII 1 , �a�ttl ' I I Y _ - 09Zt 1 9221 IB 101 g tl I I I I I I I I � g NgR OLl t11 wEp 9p Sttt 1t11 SO.eCb \ I .181 9['GB \ tle I 1 e'.0 --I —J,�o ... V ""p"a —,u W#3MIS GNV � NV113M ON ElOr 30.8 *6'w'..ir, fix) ,"3li'."2ve—m vY 4....m j 'u..- 11411c l"I UNV 3M cS/NOFl3H 31NIOd dVW Mc JOOdO1 SZL6-Z9L (90Z) 3JI 3 auJnv auNJ'eNuwNs a `o"„ "9NINNVId aNYI "JNW33NION3 IIAIJ OODZ-V£L86 VM '3111V3Sm � zeta- sz(szr) a �VCL ZOL awns 'HlnOS 3f MM 1St 0905 zzv isz(sz>) 0-1-1NOd3H 31NIOd N3V6 tlM '1N3N HinOS 30N3.AV ONZL Wgt 41 .� Z ; Q ,311u HOA n V14 �N H 2 W r Muol6uiyseM'uo}uaa m �oafoJd apnUE) pue pid uaaH a;ulad tD crsn N z° m adolS ll!� oRewa4oS Al H9' l & r �' � N o U n o n. a. x W o m m ';:.;.:.': �::: ,';: _,.•.,..,,.`_. Nig ca c W ? ro co y ro y V C O W e C O E Q LL CD N Lu LL W '' � � C m (S1 t0 3 O` C > N m ^OE N flf 3< X w cc " p cn i fJ r l E c c� cc ° y4 ro E c w a•i adolS to 0 z o E ro aol 6uoly saueA 03 0 m o awl �uadad_ _ _ `° m o m mui aE w N IN o N d (D 22 d M Q 4 t Cl � N rn m m c `o ca .0 = th�-O N EC7 .x E J C d o cn J D n `— 0 - v o. a1-- Cc n z� c W m o E 0).s 0 O N d C j Z CD J� ('7 Ui M c n 9 • • • H 2 W uj b GI a. E El El El El 7 0 0 z uj j 0 z LU UA 0 rol 6 ui -i 0 �- LU Z 0 CL CL .j .j U. CL A 0 LU 4pl-, 4 4p It 0 " pp ■ 0%0 zis 0■ r ce■ ■ o J m LL ce■ uj ■ ui ■ .j0 uj r1% - LU .j z 0 CL CL 0 0 ce ce CL ui LU s3 -s.3303 t4inos Ali-tg 03SOdOhw NO 03SVS'V3W 218VdO-13A30 NOU94 RINKM .Wl ............................................ .............. ....... ...... .... gotse KIMS 3nNaAV HIM - SM 011 NOUgH RIMW ri) W < +1 a W U- 0 w W m o w CC Ul (0 Z) a- U- co 0 U- < 0 j o T LL < U, +1 Z z 0 (1) < LL z w (L w LU 0) w m P < W ML Z tl w 0 U- tl W LU 8 LL LL z (DLC LL0 tL LL 0 LL 0 0 w w LU w X x cc m lei ............ ilj oozvt ri) W < +1 a W U- 0 w W m o w CC Ul (0 Z) a- U- co 0 U- < 0 j o T LL < U, +1 Z z 0 (1) < LL z w (L w LU 0) w m P < W ML Z tl w 0 U- tl W LU 8 LL LL z (DLC LL0 tL LL 0 LL 0 0 w w LU w X x cc m lei ilj ri) W < +1 a W U- 0 w W m o w CC Ul (0 Z) a- U- co 0 U- < 0 j o T LL < U, +1 Z z 0 (1) < LL z w (L w LU 0) w m P < W ML Z tl w 0 U- tl W LU 8 LL LL z (DLC LL0 tL LL 0 LL 0 0 w w LU w X x cc m lei 83dO'1S 3043 HIN '1 a3SOdo8d 80196 VM `RIUY3S NO 43SVS V38V 9-MVdO13A34 H111OS 3f1N3AV HIM - 9d16 3WASIJ ANVWidd N083H 31NI0d OT7 NOH34 MMOd �IM1 3 e Q .6ja >k 3 s W� uJ � CC n cli 1 Q t4tLL W <t rn it U u mLL tv 7j Fes- Cl uj 11 ii cc W L °z cox �y �c a.. W 0 00 - 3 ix _j 0_ oom -j W tr zC] i W CC C),4 �:mo i BnbH �a OW W t7 ir U h Xx wox LL w WQ Q p :20 W L U w �pp &3 (L LL Or 7'0 w LLQ ±a. Z — — 1 ILL ""3:LL iCy 1 1 LL W O O pa oul W Q <L << CL i 1 t 1 i 1 i 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 KL Q Q Fr <C CL €.E1 W 1 1 CI < CC' w Qui .6ja >k 3 s W� uJ � CC n cli 1 Q t4tLL W <t rn it U u mLL tv 7j Fes- Cl uj 11 ii cc W L °z cox �y �c a.. W 0 00 - < ix _j 0_ —z W w 0it7 0- d -iz -j W tr zC] i W CC C),4 OW W t7 ir U h Xx wox LL w WQ Q p :20 W L U w �pp &3 (L LL Or 7'0 w LLQ ±a. Z — — 1 ILL ""3:LL iCy 1 1 LL W O O pa oul i Q <L << CL i 1 t 1 i 1 i 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 KL Q Q Fr <C CL .6ja >k 3 s } p 1 1 .6ja >k 3 s Leslie Betlach Plan Review Routing Slip Plan Number: LUA15-000039 Site Address: 1101 SW Sunset Boulevard Name: Pointe Heron Fill and Grade Permit City of r ' y RECEIVED MAY 05 2015 Cil r OF RENIU COMMUNITY SERVICES Description: The applicant, Pointe Heron LLC, is requesting a Fill and Grade Permit, SEPA Environmental Review, a Variance, and a Modification to create a protected slope at 11015W Sunset Blvd (APN 132304-9010), also known as the Sunset Bluff property. The parcel is located between SW Sunset Blvd to the north, BNSF Railroad right-of-way and Black River Riparian Forest to the south, Sunpointe Townhomes Condominium to the east and Sunset View Apartments to the west. The project site proposed for filling, excavation and grading is roughly 14.12 acres of highly disturbed area that consists largely of bare ground and a few sapling trees less than 2" in caliper. The overall parcel totals 26.26 acres. The project site portion, as well as some of the rest of the overall parcel was graded as part of the previously planned Sunset Bluff Residential Subdivision. The parcel is zoned Light Industrial (LI). Construction access to the project will be through the Stoneway Black River Quarry property at 510 Monster Road SW. The proposed fill and grade project will be completed in two phases. First, the applicant is proposing to fill the existing stormwater pond near the south edge of the site and create a new 1.SH:1V engineered fill slope along a portion of the south edge of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel in order to achieve a continuous top of slope elevation of approximately 128 feet. The second phase includes excavating and constructing a new permanent stormwater pond along the south portion of the toe of the existing slope that abuts SW Sunset Blvd's south edge (i.e. the top of the new slope) and subsequently fill areas north of the buttress fill slope. The project will involve a net fill of 477,300 cubic yards. No wetlands or streams exist within the project development portion of the site. However, there are two Category 3 wetlands on the overall parcel along the south property line. Wetland A is a 258 SF wetland near the southwest corner of the parcel and Wetland B is a 6,078 SF wetland located just east of the project area. There is also an unnamed Class 4 stream that flows into Wetland B, approximately 100 feet west of the project area. The site is located near the Black River Riparian Forest, which contains critical habitat, a stream and wetlands. The site contains geological hazards including steep slopes, landslide hazards and erosion hazards. The applicant submitted a Geotechnical and Soil Engineering Report, a Wetland & Stream Delineation, a Technical Information Report, and 2014 Great Blue Heron & Wildlife Habitat Report. Review Type: Community Services Review- VersionI Date Assigned: 05/05/2015 Date Due: 05/19/2015 Project Manager: Clark Close Environmental Im Dact Earth Animals Light/Glare Historic/Cultural Preservation Air Environmental Health Recreation Ai rport Envi ronmenta I 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Water Energy/Natural Resources Utilities Plants Housing Transportation Land/Shoreline Use Aesthetics Public Service Where to enter your comments: Manage My Reviews Which types of comments should be entered: Recommendation - Comments that impact the project including any ofthe Enivornmental Impacts above. Correction - Corrections to the project that need to be made before the review can be completed and/or requesting submittal of / additional documentation and/or resubmittal of existing documentation. What statuses should be used: Vh Reviewed - I have reviewed the project and have no comments. Reviewed with Comments - I have reviewed the project and and I have comments entered in Recommendations. Correction/Resubmit - I have reviewed the project and the applicant needs to submit and/or resubmit documentation and I have added corrqVns in Co�rrecxi! ti L %v(�j//S .}w� Gt/,Tot/a��I�i✓Sign tureo DlrectororAUt onz pre entative Date /zz, S �5� Cityty of NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS -M) ICEo)s�v lonmmeclry or Remon�rne ro la �i wba•M desvlbeme avglr+EJanam Ne nerusan lea (All vvw-9a'oew 'd wke rnev In ui be rnrouq e5ro"ewry Zgiver Dvarrvv opeM sD Monrte�Paad sw. "swttbn aaceum p�ortm n n.�rlrt•ITIT x1 aw ue�swTh, d.0olnna uGM/aolEn coxFAnvoaRsaN: Mav'eawl P.— I'M, A.— ttraee a"d ell,Mmmuuon, varl...a orner vermi �nldr may •ee.ved. c.:um,nl.,r varmR En4m� pIM�4w�'nblswey, ve.uenMse lu. rwnnlal Memamm.m, ^" P'"c orm an reamto.e o emon, rFD ann ran S.Gmdyw enron a , '`o okte J:u IamNNr erv.. Po ntt nF 6 varonana Graf nA en/WP55a:UD39 Fev 11,JMOD P—Ik—laa. �:<Jg�ar x�amo „ Inawro, q."w"owwu.taeaa �". e .d CDI xonin.11ana use. I.W. Th"I;.l�aie :#}'enaciNMzo xM,p c emoncomp a"s.v evml•n .nv:ommennl I11PAI 11-1 gvalv.t. ab•w.v.0 ,.dlKtm P. "I IPA.ed1--PMO u:ea va v�olen r�nlaJgn o.: apv elecoaes a.d req .nsssavp p ' tmmd I n waxRv to clxx n. o.sa, Asmax+ v�n uaar war�Ram ^a Pu aTs�w sa vM [clam sn sdeu Jv sh atalersl Pso-55xq�voaa me Peswu,n ,uw.,tten wmme.0 wm.vromaduiW hemmer vnmer"rec.rd Diose omanAn.d op.m ee aa:,o,"P,ol.nwbm r Tel: 1425) 430-72R9: 5o CONTACTPERSON:d Clark N. Cl-, Psciate Planner' Email; cclose@rentoewa.Rov WNEN fAWNG FO0. PR PER FILE WNW ,� J CERTIFICATION I, (,t wn-k A G405e hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted in 3 conspicuous places or nearby the described property on Date: Signed: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated_. D = G� Notary P4 is in and for the State of Washington +01A Notary #� - Notary (Print): >�'Ia,hs 29� r��, My appointment expires: 2=rrlr OF WASk\` "Is,,..— ION On the 5th day of May, 2015, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Notice of Application and Acceptance documents. This information was sent to: Agencies See Attached Jimmy Blais Owner/Applicant Gary Merlino Contact Parties of Record See Attached 1300'Surrounding Properties I See Attached (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS �t�f�.11: COUNTY OF KING ) `\�Sy��A�L�; _po eor4 F+qs A I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Sabrina Mirante signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act foFtta�ses nd�urp$ es ff mentioned in the instrument. �k�?gtf g = Dated: 20 - tary Public in and for the State of Washing Notary (Print): My appointment expires: �f. Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation and Grading Project . - LUA15-000039, ECF, SP, MOD template - affidavit of service by mailing AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology " Dept. of Ecology " Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. " Environmental Review Section Attn: Misty Blair Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 PO Box 47703 39015 —172"d Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program ** Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Laura Murphy King Area Dev. Serv., MS -240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172nd Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers * KC Wastewater Treatment Division • Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program ** Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Erin Slaten Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin 39015172 n' Avenue SE PO Box C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Boyd Powers *** WDFW - Larry Fisher' Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* Depart- of Natural Resources 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Gretchen Kaehler PO Box 47015 Issaquah, WA 98027 PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Tim McHarg Attn: Acting Community Dev. Director 35030 SE Douglas St. #210 Director of Community Development 220 Fourth Avenue South Snoqualmie, WA 98065 12835 Newcastle Way, Ste 200 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Newcastle, WA 98056 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Wendy Weiker Jack Pace, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt 355 110" Ave NE 6200 Southcenter Blvd, 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Mailstop EST 11W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98004 Seattle Public Utilities Puget Sound Energy Timothy C. Croll, Doug Corbin, Municipal Liaison Mgr. Attn: SEPA Responsible Official 6905 South 228" St 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Kent, WA 98032 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. **Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.¢ov ** Karen Walter, Laura Murphy and Erin Slaten with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. are emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email addresses: KWalter@muckleshoot.nsn.us / Lau ra.mu rphy@ muckleshoot. nsnus erin.slaten@ muckleshoot.nsn.us ***Department of Natural Resources is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice the following email address: sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov template - affidavit of service by mailing David Schoettler JIMMY BLAIS Kate StenberR Gary Merlino Construction Co Inc POINTE HERON LLC 23022 SE 48th St 9125 10th Ave S 9125 10th Ave S Sammamish, WA 98075 Seattle, WA 98108 Seattle, WA 98108 w. r Suzanne Krom 4819 49th Ave SW Seattle, WA 981164322 2143700825 2143700815 8119900000 TOYAMA VAL T+NICOLE T TABAK JUDITH J TR CANADAY JOHN DAVID+VERONICA 1012 SW 4TH PL 1024 SW 4TH PL MARIBEL RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 1034 84TH AVE NE MEDINA, WA 98039 2143700800 8119900000 7471900043 GHEZEHEISAMUELY BATSCHI JERRY A JR/YOUNG MI TRANDOIV 1048 SW 4TH PL 10843 SE 173RD ST 1105 SE 3RD PL RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 1400009 1400009 2988800015 Resident SUNSET VIEW APT HOMES LLC+S SUCKIE O'NEIL R+PAULA M SUC 11620 WILSHIRE BLVD #500 11620 WILSHIRE BLVD #500 13518 80TH AVE S LOS ANGELES, CA 90025 LOS ANGELES, CA 90025 SEATTLE, WA 98178 8119900000 8119900000 2143700830 LUBOWIECKI PIOTR J+RENATA HOLM JEFF A CHRISTIANA TRUST 14203 42ND AVE S #116 15221 SE FAIRWOOD BLVD 1610 E SAINT ANDREW PL STE B150 TUKWILA, WA 98168 RENTON, WA 98058 SANTA ANA, CA 92705 2143700861 2988800121 1400009 THARP JOHN M WILLIAMS ALFRED F+EVELYN B Resident 18218 133RD AVE SE 21 E SINCLAIR PL 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A101 RENTON, WA 98058 SHELTON, WA 98584 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A102 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A103 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A104 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A105 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A106 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A107 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A108 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A109 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A110 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A111 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A312 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A201 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 21015W Sunset Blvd APT A202 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A203 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A204 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A205 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A206 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A207 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A208 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A209 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A210 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A211 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A212 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A301 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A302 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A303 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A304 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A305 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A306 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A307 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A308 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A309 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A310 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A311 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A312 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A401 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 14D0009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A402 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A403 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A404 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A406 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A407 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A408 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A409 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A410 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A411 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 '1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT A412 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT B101 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT 8102 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT B103 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT 8104 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT B105 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT 8306 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT B201 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT B202 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT B203 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT 8204 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT 8205 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT 8206 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT B301 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT 8302 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT 8303 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT B304 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT 8305 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT B306 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT 8401 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT B402 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT 8403 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT B404 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT 8405 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT B406 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT C101 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT C102 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT C103 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT C104 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT C105 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT C106 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT C201 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT C202 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT C203 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT C204 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT C205 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT C206 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT 0301 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT C302 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT 0303 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT C304 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT C305 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT C306 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT C401 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT 0402 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT C403 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT C404 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT C405 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT C406 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D101 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D102 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D103 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D104 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT DI05 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D106 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D201 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D202 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D203 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D204 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D205 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D206 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D301 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D302 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D303 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D304 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D305 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D306 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D401 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D402 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D403 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D404 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D405 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT D406 2103 SW Sunset Blvd APT E301 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E102 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E103 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E104 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT ENS Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E106 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E107 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E108 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E109 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E110 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E111 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E112 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E201 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E202 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E203 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E204 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E205 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E206 21015W Sunset Blvd APT E207 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E208 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E209 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E210 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E211 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E212 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E301 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E302 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E303 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E304 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E305 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E306 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E307 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E308 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E309 2301 SW Sunset Blvd APT E310 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E311 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E312 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E401 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E402 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E403 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E404 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E405 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E406 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E407 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E408 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E409 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E410 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E411 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT E412 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT F101 2301 SW Sunset Blvd APT F102 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT F103 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT F104 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT F305 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT F201 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT F202 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT F203 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT F204 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT F205 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT F206 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT F301 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT F302 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT F303 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT F304 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT F305 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT F306 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT F401 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT F402 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT F403 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT F404 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT F405 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT F406 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G101 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G102 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G103 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G104 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G105 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G106 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G201 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G202 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G203 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G204 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G205 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G206 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G301 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G302 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G303 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G304 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G305 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G306 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G401 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G402 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G403 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G404 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G405 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT G406 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 21015W Sunset Blvd APT H101 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT H102 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT H103 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT H104 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT HI05 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT H106 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT H2O1 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT 1-12O2 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT H2O3 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT H2O4 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT H2O5 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT H2O6 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT H301 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT H302 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT H303 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT H304 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT H305 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT H306 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT H401 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT H402 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT H403 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1400009 1400009 1400009 Resident Resident Resident 21015W Sunset Blvd APT H404 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT H405 2101 SW Sunset Blvd APT H406 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 8119900000 2988800165 3926600030 THERESA PROPERTIES LLC BROCKWAY BRYCE E GRANT ROBERT R+GRANT JANET 2117 138TH AVE SE 2320 HUGHES AVE SW 270 NACHES AVE SW BELLEVUE, WA 98005 SEATTLE, WA 98116 RENTON, WA 98055 3926600040 3926600010 3926600020 JUBANE JOSE C LIMON BONIFACIO C 1R DAVIS RONNIE 276 NACHES AVE SW 301 OAKESDALE AVE SW 307 OAKESDALE AVE SW RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98057 7471900035 7471900030 7471900045 CHANDLER JEANNINE M BAUMGARDNER WILLIAM B STONE CASEY) 309 POWELL AVE SW 313 POWELL AVE SW 317 POWELL AVE SW RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 2143700787 7471900015 7471900020 CHAN RICHMOND GNAGY MARK S GNAGY MARK S 318 POWELL AVE SW 321 POWELL AVE SW 321 POWELL AVE SW RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 2143700795 3926600050 3926600060 NGUYEN DUC H+ANH MAI NGUYEN LUONG CHAU T+THUY-LINH TRAN THAI KIA VAN 324 POWELL AVE SW 325 OAKESDALE AVE SW 331 OAKESDALE AVE SW RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 8119900000 2988800156 8119900000 PHAN HAU VAN+THANH-TAM THI PHAN AMANDA SAVAGE HUYEN MAI+JOHN 33242139TH TER SE 3338 S MORGAN ST 351 LIND AVE W AUBURN, WA 98092 SEATTLE, WA 98118 RENTON, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 2143701845 WU BAI XING THORLEIFSON KATIE A GRUBLE EDWARD J 3585 S MORGAN ST 3788 NE 4TH ST #A-305 4327 SW TRENTON ST SEATTLE, WA 98118 RENTON, WA 98056 SEATTLE, WA 98136 2988800155 2988800145 2988800143 OKOLIE CAROLINE QUITEVIS NICHOLAS DEVERA ARTURO+NORMA R 435 MARTIN LUTHER KING WAY S 4524 S JUNEAU ST 4615 5 FRONTENAC SEATTLE, WA 98144 SEATTLE, WA 98118 SEATTLE, WA 98118 8119900000 2143701215 2143701215 KNOLL ROBERT Resident Resident 4788 BAEMAR ST 510 Stevens Ave SW APT B101 510 Stevens Ave SW APT B102 ANTIOCH, CA 94531 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 8203 510 Stevens Ave SW APT B204 510 Stevens Ave SW APT C301 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT C204 510 Stevens Ave SW APT C301 510 Stevens Ave SW APT C303 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT C304 510 Stevens Ave SW APT D101 510 Stevens Ave SW APT D102 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident $10 Stevens Ave SW APT D104 510 Stevens Ave SW APT D107 510 Stevens Ave SW APT D108 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT D206 510 Stevens Ave SW APT D301 510 Stevens Ave SW APT D304 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT D305 510 Stevens Ave SW APT D402 510 Stevens Ave SW APT E102 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT E103 510 Stevens Ave SW APT E204 510 Stevens Ave SW APT E207 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT E208 510 Stevens Ave SW APT E302 510 Stevens Ave SW APT E307 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT E402 510 Stevens Ave SW APT E407 510 Stevens Ave SW APT F105 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT F106 510 Stevens Ave SW APT F202 510 Stevens Ave SW APT F203 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT F302 510 Stevens Ave SW APT F304 510 Stevens Ave SW APT F306 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT F307 510 Stevens Ave SW APT G107 510 Stevens Ave SW APT G108 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT G203 510 Stevens Ave SW APT G206 510 Stevens Ave SW APT G207 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT G303 510 Stevens Ave SW APT G307 510 Stevens Ave SW APT G308 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT G403 510 Stevens Ave SW APT G404 510 Stevens Ave SW APT G406 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT G407 510 Stevens Ave SW APT N101 510 Stevens Ave SW APT N102 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT N103 510 Stevens Ave SW APT N104 510 Stevens Ave SW APT N201 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT N202 510 Stevens Ave SW APT N203 510 Stevens Ave SW APT N204 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT N301 510 Stevens Ave SW APT N302 510 Stevens Ave SW APT N303 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT N304 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 0101 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 0102 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 0103 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 0104 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 0201 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 0202 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 0203 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 0204 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 0301 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 0302 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 0303 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 0304 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P101 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P102 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P103 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P104 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P105 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P106 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P107 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P108 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P201 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P202 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P203 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P204 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P205 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P206 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P207 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P208 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P301 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P302 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P303 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P304 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P305 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P306 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P307 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P308 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P401 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P402 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P403 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P404 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P405 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P406 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P407 510 Stevens Ave SW APT P408 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q101 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q102 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q103 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q104 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q105 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q106 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q107 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q108 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q201 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q202 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q203 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q204 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q205 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q206 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q207 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q208 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q301 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q302 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q303 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q304 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q305 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q306 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q307 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q401 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q402 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q403 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q404 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q405 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q406 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q407 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Q408 510 Stevens Ave SW APT RSDS 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R102 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R103 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R104 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R105 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R106 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R107 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R108 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R201 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R202 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R203 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R204 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R205 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R206 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R207 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R208 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R301 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R302 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R303 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R304 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R305 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R306 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R307 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R308 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R401 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R402 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 530 Stevens Ave SW APT R403 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R404 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R405 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R406 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R407 510 Stevens Ave SW APT R408 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT Sio1 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5102 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5103 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5104 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5105 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5306 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Z143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5307 510 Stevens Ave SW APT S108 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5201 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5202 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5203 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5204 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5205 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5206 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5207 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5208 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5301 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5302 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5303 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5304 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5305 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5306 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5307 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5308 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5401 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5402 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5403 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident Resident 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5404 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5405 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5406 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 2143701215 2143701215 2143701215 Resident Resident AXIS GRAND HOLDINGS LLC 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5407 510 Stevens Ave SW APT 5408 595 5 RIVERWOODS PKWY SUITE 400 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 LOGAN, UT 84321 2143701215 2143701865 8013600065 Resident ELLINGSON SHARON 5 PROCTOR DOUGLAS L 600 SW 5th Ct 611 DALEY ST #1 7273 S 135TH ST Renton, WA 98057 EDMONDS, WA 98020 SEATTLE, WA 98178 8013600070 2143700810 2988800130 KLINE LLOYD D & GRACE CITIFINANCIAL INC WOOD VIRGINIA L 7285 S 135TH 7467 NEW RIDGE RD 7525 S 135TH SEATTLE, WA 98178 HANOVER, MD 21076 SEATTLE, WA 98178 2988800125 2988800115 2988800110 Resident MCDOWELL JAMES HARVEY CLAIRMONT TRACY B+JA NITA M 7545 S 135TH ST 7605 S 135TH ST 7609 S 135TH ST SEATTLE, WA 98178 SEATTLE, WA 98178 SEATTLE, WA 98178 2988800110 2988800105 2988800177 CLAIRMONT TRACY B+JA NITA M WANG ZHEMING+SI MAN TAYLOR TERRY G 7611 S 135TH ST 7621 S 135TH ST 7645 S 135TH ST SEATTLE, WA 98178 SEATTLE, WA 98178 SEATTLE, WA 98178 2988800170 2988800160 2988800150 ADAMS DENNIS R+DEBORAH M FE BROCKWAY W C GROSS DAVID R 7655 S 135TH ST 7805 S 135TH 7837 S 135TH ST SEATTLE, WA 98178 SEATTLE, WA 98178 SEATTLE, WA 98178 2143700986 8119900000 8119900000 PODSCHWIT NANCY M GO EMMANUEL S+MARISSA F BARAJAS PATRICIA L 832 SW 4TH PL 833 SUNSET BLVD #L-57 833 SW SUNSET #K52 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 LEMMA SINTAYEHU K JOHNSON GLORIA M SILVEO ALMA S 833 SW SUNSET A-3 BLVD 833 SW SUNSET BLVD # 1-43 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #14-C RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 KAZMI SYED A BROOKS SHANNON N RACOOSIN ELIZABETH R 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #58 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #A-2 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #A-5 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 PHAM STEVE MEKONEN ASTER RICKEYJEANNE S 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #A6 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #B-10 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #Bll RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 GOODWIN VIRGIL L SLADE JEFFREY D BACANI ALEJANDRO D+MARIA LO 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #B-8 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #C 16 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #C-12 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 PATTON CHARLENE A LU HIEP SEBIAL MARIE ALEMIL B 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #C-13 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #C-15 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #C17 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 NAKAGAWA DEEAN 5 FISHER RICHARD C DORSEY RHONDA L 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #D-18 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #D39 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #D-20 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 FOWLER THOMAS+AMY M SHOGE HAILEGABRIEL DO TUAN Q+KHOA T LE 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #E 23 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #E22 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #E24 RENTON, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 KHALIFE MARILYN TONG DONALD YUEN WING YIU 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #E-25 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #E7 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #F28 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 URH MARIAN KING ERNEST+ANN L RABAGO GINNY S 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #F-29 833 SW SUNSET BLVD#F30 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #F31 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 HOIDA SPENCER DAI WEI QIANG BOWSER MICHAEL L 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #F32 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #G-34 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #G35 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 DOMINGUEZ FRANKLIN R LAM OAI QUOC ZENG GUO LIN+YUE CHAN CHEN 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #G-36 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #H38 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #H40 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 NGUYEN KIM-THAO THI JONES KELVIN R BACZYNSKI JORDAN 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #H41 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #1-47 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #K53 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 REINGOLD EVELYN JOYCE HENDERSON MEAGAN L Resident 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #L-56 833 SW SUNSET BLVD #M59 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT Al RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 Resident Resident Resident 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT AZ 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT A3 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT A4 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 Resident Resident Resident 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT AS 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT A6 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT B30 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 Resident Resident Resident 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT B31 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT B7 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT B8 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 Resident Resident Resident 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT B9 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT C12 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT C13 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 Resident Resident Resident 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT C14 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT C15 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT C16 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 Resident Resident Resident 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT C17 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT D18 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT D19 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 Resident Resident Resident 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT D20 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT D21 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT E22 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 Resident Resident Resident 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT E23 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT E24 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT E25 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 Resident Resident Resident 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT E26 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT E27 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT F28 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 Resident Resident Resident 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT F29 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT F30 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT F31 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 Resident Resident Resident 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT F32 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT G33 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT G34 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 Resident Resident Resident 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT G35 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT G36 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT G37 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 8,119900000 8119900000 8119900000 Resident Resident Resident 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT H38 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT H39 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT H40 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 Resident Resident Resident 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT H41 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT 142 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT 143 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 Resident Resident Resident 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT 144 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT 145 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT 146 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 Resident Resident Resident 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT J47 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT J48 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT J49 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 Resident Resident Resident 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT J50 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT J51 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT K52 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 Resident Resident Resident 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT K53 833 5W Sunset Blvd APT K54 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT L55 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 Resident Resident Resident 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT L56 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT L57 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT M58 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 Resident Resident LEATHERMAN HISAKO 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT M59 833 SW Sunset Blvd APT M60 833 SW SUNSET BLVD E-26 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 HASSAN SUAAD FERRIES TRACY N DELELEGN ASHENAFI 833 SW SUNSET BLVD UNIT A-1 833 SW SUNSET BLVD UNIT B-7 833 SW SUNSET BLVD UNIT J48 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98057 8119900000 8119900000 8119900000 FISSEHA DANIEL H+YEHARERWOR WROBLEWSKA EWA HENNINGS LENNIE L 833 SW SUNSET BLVD UNIT M-60 833 SW SUNSET BLVD LINT H-39 833 SW SUNSET BV #1 44 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 8013600060 2143700861 1323049006 EVANS TODD D+MATSUMOTO KANA THARPJOHN M POINTE HERON LLC 87265 5135TH ST 912 SW 4th PI APT 2 912510TH AVE S SEATTLE, WA 98178 Renton, WA 98057 SEATTLE, WA 98108 2143700855 2143700845 2143700840 HAYWARD RICHARD&ELVALENE TR ENG GERALD L & KATHERINE B ELISEUSON CHERYL L 916 SW 4TH PL 920 SW 4TH PL 924 SW 4TH PL RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 2988800100 7471900005 1323049020 STAATS KIM OLSEN JESSE & KIM BNSF 9766 ARROWSMITH AVE S PO BOX 823 PO BOX 961089 SEATTLE, WA 98118 RENTON, WA 98057 FORT WORTH, TX 76161 Denis Law City Of CY Mayor Community& Economic Development Department May 7, 2015 C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Jimmy Blais Pointe Heron, LLC 5050 1st Ave 5, Ste 102 Seattle, WA 98134 Subject: Follow-up Letter Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project, LUA1S-000039, ECF, SP, MOD Dear Mr. Blais: Thank you for meeting with the City of Renton on May 4, 2015 regarding the Pointe Heron LLC Grade and Fill Permit Application for a proposed filling, excavation, and grading project within a 14.12 -acre project site portion of Lot 1 of the SR 900 L.L.C. Lot Line Adjustment (Rec. #20040311900015). The purpose of the meeting was to convey information that the Planning Division is considering recommending a limited scope environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Pointe Heron LLC project to the Environmental Review Committee (ERC). The EIS process would provide opportunities for the public, agencies and tribes to participate in developing and analyzing the proposal and would allow City Staff the opportunity to fully understand the impacts of the proposed project including an evaluation of alternatives. Based on the adopted SEPA policies and the resulting information from the EIS, staff would be able to make an informed recommendation to the Hearing Examiner on the requested variance for the proposed 1.5H:1V engineered fill slope along a portion of the south edge of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel (APN 132304-9010). At this time, the following factors are being considered by the Planning Division when considering a determination of significance (DS) recommendation to the ERC: 1. Scale/Intensity and the amount of fill identified in the Geotechnical Report; 2. Critical Area Slopes; 3. Proximity to Sensitive Areas and Open Space (Black River Riparian Forest); 4. Transportation Impacts; and 5. Proximity to a proposed regional trail (Lake to Sound). Once again, the City appreciates your efforts to continue a dialogue about the environmental impacts associated with the project and will continue to work Renton City Hall . 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 . rentonwa.gov Pointe Heron LLC Page 2 of 2 May 7, 2015 collaboratively throughout the process. It was also discussed that additional meetings may be held prior to the tentatively scheduled ERC meeting on June 8, 2015, provided that the Planning Division maintains its position on recommending a DS to ERC following the public comment period for the project. Please contact me at (425) 430-7289 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Clark H. Close Associate Planner Pointe Heron LLC / Owner(s) Krom; Stenberg / Parties of Record Denis Law ® Clty O s fFN �O Community& Economic Development Department May 5, 2015 C.E."Chip"Vin cent, Administrator Jimmy Blais Pointe Heron, LLC 5050 1st Ave S, Ste 102 Seattle, WA 98134 Subject: Notice of Complete Application Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project, LUA15-000039, ECF, SP, MOD Dear Mr. Blais: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on June 8, 2015. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. In addition, this matter is tentatively scheduled for a Public Hearing on July 21, 2015 at 11:00 am, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant are required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you prior to the scheduled hearing. Please contact me at (425) 430-7289 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Clark H. Close Associate Planner cc: Pointe Heron, LLC/Owner(s) Krom; Stenberg/ Parties of Record Renton City Hall . 1055 South Grady Way . Renton, Washington 98057 . rentonwa.gov City of NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS -M) A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) — Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: May 5, 2015 LAND USE NUMBER: LUASS-000039, ECF, SP, MOD PROJECT NAME: Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Pointe Heron LLC, is requesting a Fill and Grade Permit, SEPA Environmental Review, and a Modification to create a protected slope at 1101 SW Sunset Blvd (APN 132304-9010), also known as the Sunset Bluff property. The parcel is located between SW Sunset Blvd to the north, BNSF Railroad right-of- way and Black River Riparian Forest to the south, Sunpointe Townhomes Condominium to the east and Sunset view Apartments to the west. The project site proposed for filling, excavation and grading is roughly 14.12 acres of highly disturbed area that consists largely of bare ground and a few sapling trees less than 2" in caliper. The overall parcel totals 26.26 acres. The project site portion, as well as some of the rest of the overall parcel was graded as part of the previously planned Sunset Bluff Residential Subdivision. The parcel is zoned Light Industrial (LI). Construction access to the project will be through the Stoneway Black River Quarry property at 510 Monster Road SW. The proposed fill and grade project will be completed in two phases. First, the applicant is proposing to fill the existing stormwater pond near the south edge of the site and create a new 1.5H:1V engineered fill slope along a portion of the south edge of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel in order to achieve a continuous top of slope elevation of approximately 128 feet. The second phase includes excavating and constructing a new permanent stormwater pond along the south portion of the toe of the existing slope that abuts SW Sunset Blvd's south edge (i.e. the top of the new slope) and subsequently fill areas north of the buttress fill slope. The project will involve a net fill of 477,300 cubic yards. No wetlands or streams exist within the project development portion of the site. However, there are two Category 3 wetlands on the overall parcel along the south property line. Wetland A is a 258 SF wetland near the southwest corner of the parcel and Wetland B is a 6,078 SF wetland located just east of the project area. There is also an unnamed Class 4 stream that flows into Wetland B, approximately 100 feet west of the project area. The site is located near the Black River Riparian Forest, which contains critical habitat, a stream and wetlands. The site contains geological hazards including steep slopes, landslide hazards and erosion hazards. The applicant submitted a Geotechnical and Soil Engineering Report, a Wetland & Stream Delineation, a Technical Information Report, and 2014 Great Blue Heron & Wildlife Habitat Report. PROJECT LOCATION: 1101 SW Sunset Boulevard, Renton, WA 98057 PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: April 27, 2015 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: May 5, 2015 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Jimmy Blais / Pointe Heron, LLC / 5050 1" Ave S, Ste 102 / Seattle, WA 98134 / 206-762-9125 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Grade and Fill, Modification, Variance Other Permits which may be required: Construction Permit, Grading License Requested Studies: Geotechnical and Soil Engineering Report, Geotechnical Study, Technical Memorandum, Technical Information Report If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED— Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation and Grading Project / LUA15-000039, ECF, SP, MOD NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY/STATE/ZIP: TELEPHONE NO.: Location where application may be reviewed: Department of Community & Economi elopment (CED)— Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1_.,:, South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing is tentatively scheduled for July 21 2015 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers at 11:00 am on the 7th floor of Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: The subject site is designated COMP-EAV on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and IL on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-9-080 and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Clark H. Close, Associate Planner, CED — Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on May 19, 2015. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on July 21, 2015, at 11:00 am, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Planning Division to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled at (425) 430-6578. Following the issuance of the SEPA Determination, you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments regarding the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail, please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision an this project. CONTACT PERSON: Clark H. Close, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7289; Email: cclose@rentonwa.gov PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION Ali, 3'Sa.(k, HAL .N LAW cavidhalinen@halinenlaw.com J Seattle • 206.443.4684 • Tacoma • 253.627.6680 • Fax • 253.272.9876 • Cell • 206.7'3.0992 Halinen Law Offices P -019 Regents Blvd Ste 202 Fircrest. WA 98466-6037 • haiinen— cam May 4, 2015 HAND -DELIVERED City of Renton Department of Community R E C 1E a V E and Economic Development m 1055 S. Grady Way, Sixth Floor Renton, Washington 98057 Attn: Chip Vincent, Administrator Vanessa Dolbee, Planning Division Manager, Clark Close, Associate Planner RE: My client Pointe Heron LLC's Grade and Fill Permit Application for a proposed filling, excavation, and grading project within a 14.12 -acre project site portion of Lot 1 of the SR 900 L.L.C. Lot Line Adjustment (Rec. # 20040311900015)—LUA15-000039 Requests under WAC 197-11-350(2) Concerning (1) Whether the City Is Considering a SEPA Threshold Determination of Significance (DS) for the Proposal and, If So, (2) the Impacts Which Lead the City to Consider a DS Likely Dear Mr. Vincent, Ms. Dolbee, and Mr. Close: In regard to Pointe Heron LLC's Grade and Fill Permit Application assigned LUA15- 000039, m� client Pointe Heron LLC hereby makes the following requests in view of WAC 197- 11-350(2): I Paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of WAC 197-11-350 (Mitigated DNS) state The purpose of this section is to allow clarifications or changes to a proposal prior to making the threshold determination. (1) In making threshold determinations, an agency may consider mitigation measures that the agency or applicant will implement. (2) After submission of an environmental checklist and prior to the lead agency's threshold determination on a proposal, an applicant may ask the lead agency to indicate whether it is considering a DS. If the lead agency indicates a DS is likely, the applicant may clarify or change features of the proposal to mitigate the impacts which led the agency to consider a DS likely. The applicant shall revise the environmental checklist as may be necessary to describe the clarifications or changes. The lead agency shall make its threshold determination based upon the changed or clarified proposal. If a proposal continues to have a probable significant adverse environmental impact, even with mitigation measures, an EIS shall be prepared. (3) Whether or not an applicant requests early notice under subsection (2), if the lead agency specifies mitigation measures on an applicant's proposal that would allow it to issue a DNS, and the proposal is clarified, changed, or conditioned to include those measures, the lead agency shall issue a DNS. (Emphasis added.) City of Renton Department of Community and Economic Development Attn: Chip Vincent, Administrator, Vanessa Dolbee, Planning Division Manager, and Clark Close, Associate Planner May 4, 2015 Page 2 (1) A request for a written response concerning whether the City is considering a SEPA threshold Determination of Significance (DS) for the proposal and (2) If the City is considering a SEPA threshold Determination of Significance (DS) for the proposal, a request for a written response concerning the particular impacts which lead the City to consider a DS likely. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. David L. Hali en cc: Pointe Heron LLC Attn: Jim Blais (with copies of attachments) Y:\efl2623\023\City\Vincent, Dolbee, and Close LT3 (DLH 05-04-2015).doc ,LpSCIVII eNsiaeec Brio aLaNmivs-sunvtn%c m — Z `o hG EN6�N� LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: David L. Halinen Halinen Law c/o City of Renton,_ Development Services - 6th Floor Renton, WA RE: Pointe Heron DATE: Aoril 24, 2015 SENT VIA: Courier Delivery PHONE NO.: OUR JOB: 14200 Quantity Date Description 16 Copies 4/24/15 Color Map Exhibit 1 - Primary Future Developable Areas (12 Folded, 4 Rolled) 16 Copies 4/24/15 Color Map Exhibit 2 - Primary Future Developable Areas (12 Folded, 4 Rolled) For your submittal to City of Renton. Signed: �) Don E. Dawes, P.E. Project Engineer 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • TUMWATER, WA • LONG BEACH, CA • ROSEVILLE, CA • SAN DIEGO, CA 14200t.035.doc www.barghausen.com Denis Law City Of,-� r Mayor p---- -- 11 �Z N2l? February 16, 2015 Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Jimmy Blais Pointe Heron, LLC 5050 1st Ave S, Ste 102 Seattle, WA 98134 Subject: Notice of Incomplete Application Point Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project, LUA15-000039, ECF, SP, MOD Dear Mr. Blais: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is incomplete according to submittal requirements and a Variance application will need to be submitted by May 16, 2015, in order to continue processing your application. The submitted application for filling, excavation, and grading was defined as a 14.12 - acre project site (portion of Lot 1 of the SR 900 L.L.C, Lot Line Adjustment Rec. #20040311900015) that included creating a 1.5H:1V engineered fill slope (i.e., a slope of approximately sixty-seven percent (67%)] along a portion of the south edge that will exceed fifteen feet (15') in height. A modification request, per RMC 4-9-250D.1, was deferentially submitted in order to create the proposed slope's design or "buttress fill," as depicted on the Barghausen Grading Plans (Geotechnical and Soil Engineering Report prepared by Earth Solutions NW LLC, dated August 13, 2014; Plate 3, Exhibit B). Per RMC 4-4-060N.6 the maximum slope allowed as part of a fill project shall be no steeper than is safe for the intended use, except in conjunction with a modification granted per Renton Municipal Code (RMC) 4-9-250D.1 for one of the circumstances listed in RMC 4- 3-050N.2.a(ii) (Geologic Hazards — Modifications). Exceptions to the prohibition of development of regrading, filling or grading to allow a protected slope may be granted for: (a) Regrading of any slope which was created through previous mineral and natural resource recovery activities or was created prior to adoption of applicable mineral and natural resource recovery regulations or through public or private road installation or widening and related transportation improvements, railroad track installation or improvement or public or private utility installation activities, Renton City Hall . 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov (b) Filling against the toe of a natural rock wall or rock wall created through mineral and natural resource recovery activities or through public or private road installation or widening and related transportation improvements, railroad track installation or improvement or public or private utility installation activities; and/or (c) Grading to the extent that it eliminates all or portions of a mound or to allow reconfiguration of protected slopes created through mineral and natural resource recovery activities or public or private road installation or widening and related transportation improvements, railroad track installation or improvement, or public or private utility installation activities. Otherwise, fill operations associated with a plat, short plat, subdivision or dedication, or other permitted land development activity which would result in the creation of permanent slopes forty percent (40%) or greater which are fifteen feet (15') in height, i.e., protected slopes, shall not be approved. Per RMC 4-3-050J.5.c. exceptions to the prohibition may be granted pursuant to a variance as stated in RMC 4-9-25081 and B6. Please contact me at (425) 430-7289 if you have any questions. Sincerely, `/ �/, 6� k' /f - (ms`s --- Clark H. Close Associate Planner Geotechnical and Soil Engineering Report prepared by Earth Solutions NW LLC, dated August 13, 2014; Plate 3, Exhibit B [c! Pointe Heron, LLC/Owner(s) Party(ies) of Record Project File LUA15-000039, ECF, SP, MOD ;§ ;!« ' i w ]}E - \- 9 \\ \\ ® } -�- !3! @ _° m _ f} . ! _ z « ig> 31( 6 ! �� - d/ <^ d ?: i }EF . . .. ....... ./��� .. . .. .. z 2 __,__ e w m Core. ,_./_» Washington �,• _� r 50' R CITY OF CL - C PLAN Cy _ RE.NTDN TE3C PLAN 81R18ET SLUFF �w 0C� o 2zz� �� �,\�\\= �4 •.«#,_ :�. zzm3 IIIIS� OC VIII', t v- g i v n - l o N v vat 't o 0 12 Ao v E �I�atv�v a1 �t ix rr��✓�� �. rL 1 � L L� 1 Ii a;,l ei v��tfdr � v,,.i•? ° � �r+ 'i i i y����ir��j rrlC1 j g+I l;i @ liN k •4,144x� �4p�tVi�t�1-1tli,�'..�� i 9 a94p F _ a$ 1 1 II E � C'�Q� p� s � u�icxrF �affrd w9 caslnunox FOR: MILE. MER.No LAVs DEvaoPAEmm co. NC. CLEA S la MAL GRADWQ .) E. sj1s;-szzz� 9125 VM AVENUE 8OUIH AND TESC PLAN ias;ss�-n�az �.x SEATTLE, WA 96= :. Id wrnwc u.Aaxmn. (208) 752-9125 ' SUNSET BIUFzF 9C E. JOB NO. 709.1 4 m446-- uwwl„om soar ww o. oo D �- - p -SO' CITY OF CLEARING, INITIAL GRADING, R RENTA AND TESC PLAN x Pm an of imnox couclns a rro io a vm mr a aMox �— oc wo T as �. •,. `r ,,-.�,,,, oAruN m aannin Bu04in�q^PuGlic Worlu t. a.ov mmnm P E Aemuu.wiP. SUNSET BLUFF ND. REVISgN W DATE VPR ^•m W ""®•"• ' j � € •�• � ji ' /r��i r Il/ ��. f !" _�' `"s�k�3,;�''�f,�l;;rti/' �i i T i .••-\ I � r i rig r�� " 29 a. x ( {l / li ✓f vl 4 / ((r `A �r fji -iz , � ( /j f1fl i rig irr, ri rr'I "aasa � / � � � '��,/%/ �/ f �r/'�+rr /..ixz T.F�� X' � n � L�� t Lf � ry r�,�%•� � / r/ i�� , ir' / ea"sm�� % f� ;/ ` '/! / /,/l��%'�•,r /! �`~x� / ��C / i/r ��y�pG%y+' � 8 � �� _ _ _ / NNIIIIVVIIWW ��� r l• !� � /�. ��Pi � /J � -�- 1 ��'� i�)4 � � /5 " l �/r/�� ��� r� 7 �� r , j q r r < � a t/9%0 /JI, y s ,e t tt� / m -� i�/ r fi/� //� % �i �� cn /-�r��l� z Z tj i�''I £ '; �y4��y 'd�if �Ty S -if;,, ,<% ,:� 1' `✓� � `a r lf• � / r S. y�'f... 7r s ;E 8 9 �O � 'nr o FOR: tl 2 QL KENT AVE 72N0 NUE SOUTN P � KENT, WA 98032 MERLINO LAND DEVELOPMENT CO., INC. y 8 C m i (425)251-6222 9125 10TH AVENUE SOUTH N' (425)257-8782 FAX SEATTLE, WA 98108 e "I CML (206) 762-9125 m � .rl'rya cxcx'4°' ETIAlE/TWD, LVID PIAaWID. FNNROMIEIRAL SERADES G)cm �zc> Vico m= zI G) Z iW p z T �; o0 Az o> a `0 o �' m DD Oo m z m 0 0 Z O Z N m m n Z O G) q) co m m --_j zz 0m n 2 r CLEARING; INITIAL GRADING, AND TESC PLAN SUNSET BLUFF 7 .1 e c . , r...... .. B.C.E. JOB NO ' < � °0°. '9' ' � ' ELrev zeds CITY OF PHASE 2 - CROSS SECTION m + RENTON PLAN VIEW EXHIBIT epercm..l e1 P»er won. NO. NENSION a+ wTc .wPn--» .wa®• POINTE HERON/S' 1 tt 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 V� \ J C- 1 \ I l \ \\\,\ e � A IS �t f° V A �� A �� • A A v`V lk - '.1� A. �. �V ��•1; \ � � V'' \�`=. '11 .t-��` \ V' �.•; A�� \.zl quo \V A A t'5�, \ \\ \V A A V 1 1 +1 �i o n 1 t A A ti,�2 Q, 11 1 yl 1� T cf) (A cf) y 280 � �g�q1 € 49 9 x D » aylyyf'a=s§ \111:.1 �,,,- mm A L1■ 11' Y14i11YiY"� iii ' '�� +irWAL(r�Li..... ' ����� ir1 1' yi6iir� BEE SHEET X4 FOR CONTINUATION m $4#! #iii W Ho 9 x 11[oH FOR TITLE 0 2 QG AVip 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH POKM HERON LLC ! E mP FZ NEM 5A 98032 PHASE 2 —CROSS SECTION (425)251-6222 50501ST AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 102 I� e to (426)251-8782 FAX SEATTLE, WA 98M-2400 PLAN VIEW EXHISrT FNG�E➢OIG. UNo P-, EIhMCx Lir/NOFxOw�4• SUN/ETxG. -k SESNIC6 (GWPOINTE HERON/S' B.C.E. JOB NO. .. — - , mNoiTaN — --- `"�• CITY OF PHASE 2 - CROSS SECTION RENTON PLAN VIEW EXHIBIT DAiVM DapoN t o, II.— WO No. NEVISION w an — --� ,�.<�, POINTE HERON/S' SEE 3-0-7 X3 FOR CONTINUATION "f'gw*%.1*N!It111A1q )MI m... I*1...... '� 1�.�•',m � -1 I � �� t ' II I 'I II t I ����1 I I \ I b I 1 S all rF4 ` I I'I/ I� I I Y U I I 1 J I I B I l pini - 89e 7 �a '� r,r'r', r ' 1,-1 I I 1 I I I h� ��m �� J{4� I I� I �5� III ' lip'I' �l IM 4 'r;,FRIT./ vJ ! 3311 m (pj will!MCI l it�m , I If I WagIL T FOR TITLE x m g '01 0, 18415 IND AVENUE SOUTH P KENT WA M22 POINTE HERON LLC e m Z PHASE 2 -CROSS SECTION (A2sjzsl-ezzz 50501ST AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 102 PLAN NEW EXHIBITe uP (1425)251-8782 FAX SEATTLE, WA 98134-2400 9 m crvc [Ncm¢SINc. INlll atrrrrmc. (206)762-9125 ``�'ho exOM��• SURJEKIC, ENNRONww. SEM B POINTE HERON/S' B.C.E. JOB NO. 14200 I— w -1" 1 t— . CITY OF RENTON PHASE 2 - CROSS SECTIONS + 1=_� oATuu oewrtm.., m v.wr wem. N0. REVISIONBY 61TE RaPR .� -W �-. POINTE HERON/S' m a g CI PR se B \ ce O ft O ve o a � ]5 ] 1i eo � a tq 6 IT PEA,Y IYIF flpffA 11( 1 n)e p � eB.93 \ o c- 1 , I ,1s.B 1]99 9 I _ ,319 I 1 I,). 113n t3z6 1 1179— 1.— P I 1 ,1306 SAS 1 P{ ,"B Ai I 113.9 � � p4 I- 3.33]) 0 7 1 ,H13 y 9 1 B 8 I 1 ua] , I. „S9e \ .1. 1 I T V I 2 I D ,.53 U2) m a g 9 9 a S 9 g a 9 S a B 9 ffi a411 •LLr�(� Sp u3 Y wo P _I Z Mp9^ m po 2 P 115 " 1 O Iggttjjll x )le 71.$ M..] � VJ 1 BBs 1 17 2 98. 14 3 I 121 ' 1 9 ,260 � x,a � I ' 1383 I I I I 1ze.e T.IT I ,wn � • a ' P I 1 �Y Ib.30 51.1 q. D R ,Bu TITLE HqFOR 18215 AVENUE saurN FZ KENT WA 9 A 8072 POINTE HERON LLC PHASE 2 - CROSS SECTIONS d 47P (a25jzs1-szzz 5050 IST AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 102 (425)251-8782 FAX SEATTLE, WA 98134-2400 PLINNRW sL6�0.yQeU�.t�' (206) 762-9125 �o f SUIMYING. E1MRIX31ffNiI1 SEIMCES POINTE HERON/S' B.C.E. JOB NO. 14200 n.o. I mo vnao P B..,rv. oo- w ..n o a? :e7u73o,. „aa .W s a : - . V ESB3r.3na3 .. ---- ra. PENSION w w1t: AVPP .-o ---®. 4.k CITY OF —7� RENTON a'T o.P=rx t m —k wen. PHASE 2 —CROSS SECTIONS POINTE HERON/S' + s 9 , a - a, , a 9 a uc • 1 a I & @ om urt 416 155 -P 'sP 4.1 p r 5.0 n'7e See 5sa• I � 56 5. e IM A tm• „60 Si•S `1 726 n.R hesa ,zs I I Ip� ofe � W \ �« +50 p twos 6 A :.5sm \ 1167 Itzo w 7 05 g9. uo if D 06 e,m u•x Idw I � nn5 ,O8A1 I '/i \JJ I e a e a m ,257 -. s I 121e 3 P �� x s � 1x•5 p. I _.. I „lie . � 1o7.w -P ,li•x _ " ,267 I \ 26S 1502 I E I \\ E PB Z I p , 'P 8g 13 \\ 8F� \ ,uz 0 _ e. co\JJ 3 .. ..... r^ 0e ,sse ' ,166 1-45 tss • , +6e B 167.] - 1 \ —71 , 1)55 I ^ o 1703 tet 6 1652 a 9 a a 9 a e 9 9 �cf) e Sr•,,�i p .r A LAS` � - m 2 PPE'HAVi9, 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KEN, WA 98032 FOR POINTE HERON LLC TITLE PHASE 2 —CROSS SECTIONS x m Z (425)251-6222 5)50 1ST AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 102 p 9 m (425)251-8782 FAX SEATTLE, WA 96134-2400 IIc u t'' •063jhG [New6 A SUR\Llit �EMARUNYE NM SEPNL6 (206) 762-9125 POINTE HERON/S' B.C.E. JOB NO. 14M . — 1 = 1 — --- City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: Pointe Heron LLC ADDRESS: 5050 1st Avenue South, Suite 102 CITY: Seattle ZIP' 98134 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206 762-9125 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: Same as property owner COMPANY (if applicable): ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206) 762-9125 CONTACT PERSON NAME: Jimmy Blais COMPANY (if applicable): Pointe Heron LLC ADDRESS: 5050 1st Avenue South, Suite 102 CITY: Seattle ZIP: 98134 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: Of: (206)-762-9125 C: 206-255-5153 Email :JBlais@amccinc.com PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Point Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 1101 SW Sunset Boulevard Renton, WA 98057 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 132304-9010 EXISTING LAND USE(S): Vacant land, much of which was substantially graded for the previously proposed Sunset Bluff residential subdivision PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Vacant EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Employment Area Valley (EAV) PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable) N/A EXISTING ZONING: Light Industrial (IL) PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): N/A SITE AREA (in square feet): Overall parcel area: 1,143,713+/- square feet. Fill, excavation, and grade project site: 615,067+/- square feet SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: 0S ft SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: 0 Sqft PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable) N/A NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) N/A NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): N/A C2ECE1uE -11 JAN 'L a Y-1cPz623Eo23�,Applica1(omMaster Application\Poi.te Heron masterapp(8-14-2014).doc CITY Of RENTON- 1=1ANNING DNI51ON PROJECT INFORMA7 NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 0 Dwelling Units SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): NIA ION (continued PROJECT VALUE: $1.0 Million IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. ■ GEOLOGIC HAZARD '0 sq. ft. (protected slopes) ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES sq. ft. WETLANDS "0 sq. ft. * No protected slopes on project site but 78,008 +/- sq. ft. on overall parcel ** No wetlands ou project site but 6.336+/- sq. ft. on overall parcel LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE N% of SE''/, & NE/, of SW% OF SECTION 13 , TOWNSHIP 23 , RANGE04 IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP n1Name/s> See attached AFFIDAVIT��t WNERSHIP. ertnelawsoftne Washi�Ilz represa corpora ion p ease a ac proo o au oriza e oregoin, s a emenandcontaianon herewith are in all respects true and correct ohe best of my knowledge and belief. Signature of OwnerlRepresentative Date Signature of Owner/Re ntative Date STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence>thatsigned this instrument and acknowledge it to be <volunt.t he uses and purpose mentioned in the instrument. Dated / Notary Public in and for the Notary (Print): My appointment expires: Y:Ac62623V023VApplicationAMaster ApplicationTeinte Ileron masterapp (8-14-2014).doc -2- AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP (with respect to the "Pointe Heron LLC Parcel") I, GARY M. MERLPNO, declare that: (1) 1 am a Manager of Pointe Heron LLC, a Washington limited liability company ("PHLLC"). As a Manager, I have authority to make decisions on PHLLC's behalf and to execute this Affidavit of Ownership on PHLLC's behalf. (2) PHLLC is the current owner of the "Pointe Heron LLC Parcel" that is legally described on the attached Legal Description sheet. (3) The foregoing statements and answers contained in the accompanying completed City of Renton Land Use Permit Master Application are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Gary M. Aerlino STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that GARY M. MERLPNO is the person who appeared before me and acknowledged that he signed the instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as a Manager of POINTE HERON LLC, a Washington limited liability company, to be the free and voluntary act of such limited liability company for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated this 1 S day of August 2014. V. C. TROFIN NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES FEBRUARY 19, 2018 (sign name of notary) (print or type name of notary) NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at 5! ,.—M ,-z 1N My Commission expires: a. 19. aG Ig LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE "POINTE HERON LLC PARCEL" Lot 1 of the SR 900 L.L.C. Lot Line Adjustment (City of Renton File No. LUA-03-124-LLA) as recorded in Volume 168 of Surveys, pages 233 through 235, under Recording No. 20040311900015, records of King County, Washington. 0 PREAPPLICATION MEETING FOR Point Heron Re -grade 8001 SW Sunset Blvd. RECEIVED 'AN 2 3 7G?5 PRE 13-001298 CITY CSF RENTON ii_nNau� uwi�iov CITY OF RENTON Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division October 3, 2013 Contact Information: Planner: Vanessa Dolbee, 425.430.7314 Public Works Plan Reviewer: Jan Illian, 425.430.7216 Fire Prevention Reviewer: Corey Thomas, 425.430.7024 Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell, 425.430.7290 Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work on the project. You wiil need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply for land use and/or environmental permits. Pre-screening: When you have the project application ready for submittal, call and schedule an appointment with the project manager to have it pre-screened before making all of the required copies. The pre -application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision -makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Development Services Director, Department of Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator and City Council). DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY ��0 • fPT. AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT s s M E M O R A N D U M DATE: October 1, 2013 TO: Vanessa Dolbee, Planner FROM: Jan Illian, Plan Review (/ SUBJECT: Point Heron Regrade 8G01—SW Sunset Blvd PRE13-001298 NOTE: The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary is preliminary and non- binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official city decision -makers. Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. I have completed a preliminary review for the above -referenced proposal. The following comments are based on the pre -application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant. Storm Drainage 1. A Construction Stormwater Permit from Department of Ecology will be required. 2. A copy of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will be provided to the City. 3. The project will require a Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead (CESCL) to provide onsite erosion control inspections and reports to DOE. Weekly erosion control reports will be submitted to the City. 4. An erosion control plan will be required to be submitted to the city for review. Any site with exposed soils during the wet season (October 1'to April 30`') shall provide additional erosion control measures. S. Drainage plans and drainage report shall comply with the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and the 2009 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWM, Chapters 1 and 2. All core and any special requirements shall be contained in the report. Based on the City's flow control map, this site fails within the Flow Control Duration Standard, Forested Conditions, The drainage report will need to follow the area specific flow control requirements under~ Core Requirement #3. H;\CPU\Planning\Current Planning\PREAPPS\1298 Vanessa\Flan Review Comments PRE13-001298.doc DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY Qf©� AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: October 3, 2013 TO: Pre -application File No. 13-001298 FROM: Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Pointe Heron Re -grade General We have completed a preliminary review of the pre -application for the above -referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre -application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification andfor concurrence by official decision -makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Community & Economic Development Administrator, Development Services Director, Public Works Administrator, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or on the City's website www.rentonwa.Rov Project Proposaf The subject property is located at 8001 SW Sunset Boulevard, also known as the Sunset Bluffs property. The project site consists of three parcels, 132304-9010, 377920-0005 and 377920-0009. The total project area is 26.26 acres in size, an area work limit of 15 acres. The applicant has proposed to re -grade the existing (previously graded site) site and relocated the existing stormwater detention pond. The re -grade is intended to "flatten" out the uneven topography of the three parcels. The applicant has indicated that 460,000 cubic yards of fill material would be needed to level the extreme topography at the site. The existing pond would be filled and recreated at the top of the new slope. The site is located near the Black River Riparian Forest, which contains critical habitat and a stream and wetlands are known to exist on the subject site. In addition, the site contains geological hazards including steep slopes, landslide hazards and erosion hazards. Note: Based on the submittal information, staff believes the intended parcel 377920-0009 is not a part of the subject proposal, but instead parcel 377920-0008 should have been listed in the application materials. As such, the following review assumes the above substitution in reviewing the proposed project. Zoning: The property is located within the Employment Area Valley (EAV) land use designation and the Industrial Light (IL) zoning designation. The project scope is limited to grading activities Pointe Heron Re -grade October 3, 2013 Page 2 of 5 which are permitted with approved permits and review. As such, the following report addresses grading activities only. Development Standards: The project would be subject to RMC 4-2-130A, "Development Standards for Industrial Zoning Designations" effective at the time of complete application (noted as "IL standards" herein). A copy of these standards is included herewith. Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations: As the project is primarily a grading/fill proposal the project would be subject to RMC 4-4-060. Landscaping: Existing vegetation in any required setback shall be preserved or landscaping shall be planted to prevent erosion and reduce the dust, mud and noise generated on the proposed reuse of the site. Around the periphery of the site, except where the proposed reuse of the site requires the lack of vegetation, the applicant shall landscape in such a manner as to result in reasonable screening. Trees planted shall be at least four feet (4') in height. In those areas that have been rehabilitated and are designated to be planted according to the proposed reuse of the site, the appropriate plantings shall be done as soon as possible to provide mature plants for the new use. Screening: With the exception of offices, every effort shall be made to screen effectively all structures and activities to minimize detrimental effects on adjacent or abutting property. Screening may include but is not limited to landscaping, berms with landscaping, and a screening fence Hydroseeding Required: Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the Surface Water Design Manual may be proposed between the dates of October 1st and April 30th of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. Engineering Grading Requirements: Soil engineering and engineering geology reports shall be required as defined in RMC 4-11-190E and 4-11-1905. During grading all necessary reports, compaction data and soil engineering and engineering geology recommendations shall be submitted to the civil engineer and the Public Works Department by the soil engineer and the engineering geologist. The Public Works Department may waive reports for minor grading operations. Fills: Fill slopes shall not be constructed: a. On natural slopes steeper than two -and -one-half horizontal to one vertical (2.5:1) that are fifteen feet (15') or greater in height (except in conjunction with a modification granted per RMC 4-9-250D1 for filling against the toe of a natural rock wall —see RMC 4-3-0501\12a(ii)(b)); or b. Where the fill slope toes out within twelve feet (12') horizontally of the top of existing or planned cut slopes that are fifteen feet (15') or greater in height and steeper than two -and - one -half horizontal to one vertical (2.5:1). Pointe Heron Re -grade October 3, 2013 Page 3 of 5 Fill material shall not contain concentrations of contaminants that exceed cleanup standards for soil specified in WAC 173-340-740, Model Toxics Control Act. Maximum Slope: The slope of fill surfaces shall be no steeper than is safe for the intended use. Except in conjunction with a modification granted per RMC 4-9-250D1 for one of the circumstances listed in RMC 4-3-050N2a(ii) (Geologic Hazards — Modifications), fill operations associated with a plat, short plat, subdivision or dedication, or other permitted land development activity which would result in the creation of permanent slopes forty percent (40%) or greater which are fifteen feet (15') in height, i.e., protected slopes, shall not be approved. Based on the provided section drawings, it appears the fill slope would exceed 40 percent. A modification could be granted if the project meets one of the items listed in RMC 4-3-050N2a(ii) referenced below: Geologic Hazards — Modifications: An applicant may request that the Administrator grant a modification to allow: (a) Regrading of any slope which was created through previous mineral and natural resource recovery activities or was created prior to adoption of applicable mineral and natural resource recovery regulations or through public or private road installation or widening and related transportation improvements, railroad track installation or improvement, or public or private utility installation activities; (b) Filling against the toe of a natural rock wall or rock wall created through mineral and natural resource recovery activities or through public or private road installation or widening and related transportation improvements, railroad track installation or improvement or public or private utility installation activities; and/or (c) Grading to the extent that it eliminates all or portions of a mound or to allow reconfiguration of protected slopes created through mineral and natural resource recovery activities or public or private road installation or widening and related transportation improvements, railroad track installation or improvement, or public or private utility Installation activities. The following procedures shall apply to any of the above activities: (1) The applicant shall submit a geotechnical report describing any potential impacts of the proposed regrading and any necessary mitigation measures; (2) All submitted reports shall be independently reviewed by qualified specialists selected by the City at the applicant's expense; (3) The Department Administrator may grant, condition, or deny the request based upon the proposal's compliance with the applicable modification criteria of RMC 4-9-250D; and Pointe Heron Re -grade October 3, 2013 Page 4 of 5 (4) Any slope which remains forty percent (40%) or steeper following site development shall be subject to all applicable geologic hazard regulations for steep slopes and landslide hazards, in this Section. (5) In addition to the criteria of RMC 4-9-250D, Modification Procedures, the following criteria shall apply: The proposed modification is based on consideration of the best available science as described in WAC 365-195-905; or where there is an absence of valid scientific information, the steps in RMC 4-9-25OF are followed. Erosion: The faces of cut and fill slopes shall be provided and maintained to control against erosion. This control may consist of effective planting. The protection for the slopes shall be installed as soon as practicable and prior to calling for final approval. Where cut slopes are not subject to erosion due to the erosion -resistant character of the materials, such protection may be omitted with the permission of the Building Department, provided that this protection is not required by the rehabilitation plan. Critical Areas — The subject site is located within a geological hazard area included high, moderate and unclassified landslide hazards, erosion hazards and sensitive and protected slopes. In addition, wetlands and a stream are known to be located on the subject site. Furthermore, the site is within close proximity to a critical habitat and a Shoreline of the State. Wetland and Stream: A wetland and stream report delineating and classifying the wetland and stream on site is required to be submitted with the formal land use application. In addition, if there are proposed impacts to the wetland and/or stream, a supplemental stream study and mitigation and monitoring plan should also be submitted. Furthermore, the site is located just outside the Shoreline Jurisdiction of the Black River Riparian forest, and therefore the stream and wetlands on the subject site may be hydrologically connected to this system. included, in the required studies should be an analysis evaluating whether or not the on-site stream and wetland are hydrologically connected. If the on-site stream are hydrologically connect, the Shoreline Jurisdiction would be extended onto the subject site and the development could be subject to Shoreline Regulations. Furthermore, when a required steam buffer falls within a protected slope area, the buffer width extends to the boundary of the protected slopes. The stream buffer would be required to be compared to the location of protected slopes to determine the final buffer edge/extent. City staff may require secondary review of the wetland and/or stream report, at the expense of the applicant. Geological Hazards: Steep slopes, landslide hazards and erosion hazards are all Geological Hazards therefore, a geotechnical study shall be provided by a qualified professional. The study shall demonstrate that the proposal will not increase the threat of the geological hazard to adjacent properties beyond the pre -development conditions, the proposal will not adversely impact other critical areas, and the development can be safely accommodated on the site. In addition, the study shall assess soil conditions and detail construction measures to assure stability. Pointe Heron Re-grade October 3, 2013 Page 5 .` 5 In addition, the site contains "protected slopes". Protected slopes are defined as topographical features that slope in excess of 40% and have a vertical rise of 15 feet or more. Development is prohibited on a protected slope. If any work is planned on a "protected slope" a Variance from the Critical Areas regulations would be required. City staff may require secondary review of the geotechnical anaysis, at the expense of the applicant. Critical Habitat: The subject site abuts the Black River Riparian Forest, which is a known critical habitat. Therefore, a habitat assessment shall be required. The assessment shall determine the extent, function and value of the critical habitat and potential for impacts and mitigation consistent with report requirements in RMC4-8-120D. Environmental Review: The project would require Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review. Do to the cubic yards of fill proposed; 'a Determination of SiFnificance_may be issued requiring an Environmental Impact Statement. Based on the proposal, it is likely the EIS would be limited scope if required. Permit Requirements The proposal would require Hearing Examiner Special Fill and Grade Permit approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review. All permits would be reviewed in an estimated timeframe of 12 weeks. The application fee for Hearing Examiner Special Fill and Grade Permit review is $2,000.00 and SEPA review is $1,000.00, for a total of $3,000.00 for review of both permits. A 3% technology fee would also be assessed at the time of land use application. Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal is provided in the attached handouts. In addition to the required land use permits, separate construction permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of the land use permits, but cannot be issued prior to the completion of any appeal periods. "Once the application materials are complete, the applicant is strongly encouraged to have one copy of the application materials pre-screened at the 6th floor front taunter prior to submitting the complete application package. Please call Vanessa Dolbee at 425-430-7213 for an appointment. Expiration and Extensions: The special permit shall be null and void if the applicant has not begun activity within six (6) months after the granting of the permit, unless the Hearing Examiner grants an extension of time. Special permits are valid until the approved plans have been satisfactorily completed. cc: Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Of T, HIT. T TH PI Tf DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: WAIVED MODIFIED BY: BY: COMMENTS: Arborist Report, CifJf =— Biological Assessment 4 Calculations 1 Colored Maps for Display 4 Construction Mitigation Description 2AND 4 Deed of Right -of -Way Dedication 1 Density Worksheet, Cibf�— N/A Drainage Control Plan z Drainage Report z Elevations, Architectural3ANo4 C�7fG N/A Environmental Checklist , Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)1 AND 4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 1ANo Flood Hazard Data 4 C*r— N/A Floor Plans 3AND 4 ^i�7f L N/A Geotechnical Report2MDa iibi L Submitted with Grade/Fill Grading Elevations & Plan, Conceptual l iibf L Submitted with Grade/Fill Grading Elevations & Plan, Detailed Habitat Data Report 4 Submitted with Grade/Fill Improvement Deferral 2 Irrigation Plano PROJECT NAME: Pointe Heron Variance DATE: 4/22/15 H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PROJECTS\15-000039.Clark\Waiver_F—jariance_15-000039.d— Rev: 02/2015 LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: WAIVED BY: MODIFIED BY: COMMENTS: King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site, Landscape Plan, Conceptual Landscape Plan, Detailed, Legal Description, Letter of Understanding of Geological Risk, i L Noted in the Geotechnical and Soil Engineering Report (pages 17-18) Map of Existing Site Conditions, Master Application Form, Monument Cards (one per monument) 1 Neighborhood Detail Map, Overall Plat Plan , Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis a C*r— N/A Plan Reductions (PMTS) e Post Office Approval , Plat Name Reservation, Plat Plan, Preapplication Meeting Summary, 061'r— Submitted with Grade/Fill Public Works Approval Letters Rehabilitation Plan , Screening Detail, Shoreline Tracking Worksheet, Site Plan =AND, *r— Submitted with Grade/Fill Stream or Lake Study, Standard, Stream or Lake Study, Supplemental, — Submitted with Grade/Fill Stream or Lake Mitigation Plan , Street Profiles, Title Report or Plat Certificate IAND 4 Topography Map 3 Traffic Study , Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan, 06f'G Submitted with Grade/Fill Urban Design Regulations Analysis, Utilities Plan, Generalized, C,6f' Submitted with Grade/Fill Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final, Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary, H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PROJECTS\15-000039.Clark\Waiver_Form_Variance_15-000039.docx Rev: 02/2015 LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: BY: BY: Wetlands Report/Delineation, i Submitted with Grade/Fill Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2AND3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2AND3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2AND3 _ Map of Existing Site Conditions 2AND3 Map of View Area 2AND3 Photosimulations 2AND3 This Requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services 2 Development Engineering Plan Review 3 Building 4 Planning H:\CEO\Planning\Current Planning\PR0JECTS\15-000039.0ark\Waiver_Form_Variance_15-000039.docx Rev: 02/2015 U �i�a�+ 7 0 I`s�iv J 1pdtRf�. �U,nat Kin rub j/n �tlo��itd' PLANNING DIVISION t WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS w It, This requirement may be waived by: � n �1 '•�� 1. Property17l h�0 Services PROJECT NAME: -I r 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building DATE: T���i( 4✓ I 4. Planning RECEIVED H-\CED0e,\Forms-Templaies%Se9-Help Ha(WOU Ti,nning�aiva fsubmraFegsx6 Ua.�,V 2 e)0�1891 CITY OF Rfj,vTON pIJ,NNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Plat Name Reservation , PrOaFiplinatiorr Nleefinj 6urEiiriary j Public Works Approval Letter 2 RehablOtatioriPlaR, ; Screening Detail 4 SdePlan4Ah[ 4 Stream or Lake Study, Standard, Siream or Lake Study, S�pplemental4 ;- Stream or Lake Mitigation Plan, Street Profiles' Title Report or Plat Certificate . Topography -11 Traffic Study 2 TreeCutfingll-aKd Cleanng.Plan 4 Urban Design Regulations Analyses, Utlleteesplan, Genera0zedz; ;,._ Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final, Wetlands Mi6ofion PIdn,Arelmmary Wetlands Report/Delineafion , �rele5s Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND a Inventory of Existing Sites2AND9 Lease Agreement, O raft 2 AN❑ 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AN❑ 3 Map of View Area 2 ANo 3 Photosimulations 2All 3 6% t ww► rr' This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services 2. Public Works Plan Review 1 Building 4. Planning U �*r!-ef Mot PROJECT NAME: S �l' t C �P G� DATE: 4 C7 17f H: 10EDOIWFortns-Templet-Z.H-Help HandoulslPlanningW mve0rsubmntaVedsx', 05,gg PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS I �1 �� Us�'P�i�,[�Ii�4JBl�nti7`AI� � .`✓VAIV�� �' ,Mb f�Fpf�D r,l s �fi1U1RE'NJE}+1T'S ? -:a I .iS�" 'n`, z l�i3 T.',%� r.; # ''� a5 f�.,�p tvis w,r F` r Calculations Coltf�d\Naps dor ©isplay d h ,. ; 1 ,w: ,K ._v Construction Mitigation Description 2AND a l7aednfR�hY4,f�Nay132�t1gaft0 £ � .T ��.,� .�, *r'. e,^.( •.'`� t Density Worksheet 4 �15 Drainage Report a EI0Vatl sns Arrc�f k4raIAND, s w Y. , i, r� s t x r. ( yq'j}'fir Environmental Checklist 4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Floor Plans 3 AND 4 ,�.z,..:,�'>: Grading Plan, Cenceptual� �radln�`I'lar� oN- v. Habitat Data Report 4 Trp v"inent �ffjf I zr. ° 7 Irrigation plan Landscape Plan, Conceptual¢ Legal Description¢ Master Application Form, x Neighborhood Detail Map 4 ?{t 9't ivere LaS�dseaQl[ 9 flgalYsiswk,. 3 s F l 1 a t Plan Reductions (PMTS), FtP(< This requirement may be waived by: + 1. Property Services PROJECT NAME:I�ejbirl 01-!q �a 2. Public Works Plan Review j 3. Building DATE: 4. Planning H'.\CED\Ofl+a\Forms-7emplatesl5elf-He1p Han�oNs\Planning\�vanerofsubmiLa7regs.X�s 06149 PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS ;ND �1^�� RERM17 SU�KiI fl�i'L ' 3 i� } TiV%111b h1011iF[EF�J t 'f" s t Pt��' F�EQU�iig(VIEN'��, Plat Name Reservation, iareDllttt0(t MeeElrogtimmtyx Iny t, iI` h ul P Public Works Approval Lettere Screening Detail, Stream or Lake Study, Standard, Stream or Lake Mitigation Plan 4 r�0t'�n�7ii�a5 ` P; 1: t S .. t �� r s s` k t _ .>Z,,.'t5:^, r Title Report or Plat Certificate, Traffic Study 2 r 'k Urban Design RegulationsAnalysis4 This requirement may be waived by: (� t. Property Services PROJECT NAME: qMh 2. Public Works Plan Review (� 3. Building DATE: 3 4. Planning H:\CEL)%Data\Fo,, s-T,,,plat,sl3,:f-Halp 1,AandoutslPlannin8lwaiveeVs,bmittal,eys x1s OG/09 PROJECT NARRATIVE Justification for the Proposed "Point Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project' Project Name: Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project RECEIVED jAivi 2 3 N15 Size and Location of site: CITY OF RENTON The approximately 14.12 -acre filling, excavation, and grading project site`'it"' 'A '& e approximately 26.26 -acre parcel of land on which the previously proposed Sunset Bluff residential subdivision development was approved. That parcel of land is located at 1101 SW Sunset Boulevard Renton WA, 98057, between SW Sunset Boulevard to the north and the BNSF Railroad right-of-way to the south, and between the forested westerly end of the existing Sunpointe Townhomes Condominium development property to the east and the Sunset View Apartments and the Black River Quarry parcels to the west. Assessor's Parcel Number: The Pointe Heron LLC parcel on which the subject project site is located has been assigned King County Assessor's Parcel Number 132304-9010. Legal Description of the Parcel: The legal description of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel on which the subject project site is located is as follows: Lot 1 of the SR 900 L.L.C. Lot Line Adjustment (City of Renton File No. LUA-03- 124-LLA) as recorded in Volume 168 of Surveys, pages 233 through 235, under Recording No. 20040311900015, records of King County, Washington. Land use permits required for proposed project: A Special Grade and Fill permit pursuant to Renton Municipal Code Section 4-9-080 is required for the proposed project. - Zoning designation of the site and adjacent properties: The entire parcel on which the subject project site is located is zoned Light Industrial Light (IL). Project Narrative Pointe Heron LLC Properties adjacent to the east, west, north, and south of the parcel are currently zoned as follows: To the east: Residential Multi -Family (RM -F) zoning exists on the Sunpointe Townhomes property. To the west: Light Industrial (IL) zoning exists on an approximately 0.9 -acre vacant east portion of the Sunset View Apartments property. To the west of that portion of the Sunset View Apartments property, the Sunset View Apartments property is zoned Residential Multi -Family (RM -F). Light Industrial (IL) zoning exists on the east portion of the Black River Quarry property. To the north A narrow tract of land lying between (1) the north edge of the portion of the parcel on which the subject project site is located and (2) the south edge of SW Sunset Boulevard is zoned Light Industrial (IL). Single- family residential neighborhoods lie to the north of SW Sunset Boulevard north of the subject parcel (some on lands within unincorporated King County zoned R-8 by King County and some on lands within the City of Renton zoned R-8 by Renton). To the south: Along and to the south of approximately the west 600 feet of the subject parcel, both (1) the abutting 100 - foot -wide Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad right-of-way and (2) the portion of the open space area owned by the City of Renton to the south of that right- of-way are zoned Resource Conservation (RC). Along and to the south of approximately the east 900 feet of the west 1,500 feet of the subject parcel, both (1) the abutting 100 -foot -wide Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad right-of-way and (2) the portion of the open space area owned by the City of Renton to the south of that right-of-way are zoned Commercial Office (CO). August 18, 2014 Project Narrative Pointe Heron LLC Current use of the site and any existing improvements: The overall parcel encompassing the project site is currently vacant. The project site portion and some of the rest of the overall Pointe Heron LLC parcel were graded as part of site development work for the previously planned Sunset Bluff Residential existing topography across the site is variable, largely the result of commercial aggregate mining and import grading operations. A storm water detention/water quality pond constructed as part of the Sunset Bluff project is located along a central portion of the south edge of the parcel within the currently proposed project site. Special site features (i.e., wetlands, water bodies, steep slopes): Wetlands and an Unnamed Intermittent Stream No wetlands or streams exist within the project site. However, a portion of each of two wetlands and an intermittent stream—water bodies referred to in the subject Special Grade and Fill Permit application materials as "Wetland A," "Wetland," and an "unnamed (Class 4) stream"—lie within the parcel on which the project site is located. See the accompanying (color) Wetlands and Stream Map for a depiction of their locations and respective buffers and a brief summary statement concerning each of them. Raedeke Associates, Inc.'s August 13, 2014 QIP/Virtu/Sunset Bluff (MLDC) Properties Wetland & Stream Delineation Update 2014' technical memorandum in support of the provides both (1) an assessment of the wetlands and a study of the unnamed stream in relation to the proposed filling, excavation, and grading project and (2) copies of prior studies of both of the two wetlands and the stream. ' Because, during 2009, (a) Raedeke had previously jointly studied (i) what is now the Pointe Heron LLC parcel while it was owned by Merlino Land Development Co. (aka "MLDC"), (b) the easterly three lots of the Black River Quarry Property to the west of the subject Pointe Heron LLC parcel while those three lots were then owned by Quarry Industrial Park L.L.C. (aka "QIP"), and (c) an approximately 0.9 -acre vacant southeasterly triangular portion of the abutting Sunset View Apartments property while that property was then still owned by AG/virtu Sunset View, L.L.C. (aka "Virtu"), Raedeke's prior (2009) wetlands report referred to what is now the Pointe Heron LLC parcel as the "MLDC property," what is now the east part of the quarry property as the "QIP property," and the 0.9 -acre vacant southeasterly triangular portion of the abutting Sunset View Apartments property as the "Virtu property" for continuity with Raedeke's 2009 report. 3 August 18, 2014 Project Narrative Pointe Heron LLC Wetland A is an approximately 408 -square -foot Category 3 wetland with a 25 -foot -wide buffer. Approximately 258 square feet of Wetland A lie within the subject parcel and the balance of the wetland (approximately 150 square feet) lie within the abutting BNSF Railroad right-of-way. Wetland B is as an approximately 2 -acre existing wetland that: (a) Is located in a depression that has neither a piped outlet nor a surface water outlet; (b) Straddles the south boundary of the eastern portion of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel with (i) only about 6,078 square feet of Wetland B lying within the parcel and (ii) the balance (most of it) located offsite on the parcel of land to the southeast of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel and east of the BNSF Railroad right-of-way; and (c) Is either (i) a Category 3 wetland (with a 25 -foot -wide buffer) under Renton's critical area regulations if the wetland is not hydraulically connected to the existing wetlands in the Black River Riparian Forest to the southwest of Wetland B across the BNSF Railroad right-of-way or (ii) a Category II wetland (with a 150 -foot -wide buffer) under Renton's shoreline master program critical area regulations if the wetland is hydraulically connected to the existing wetlands in the Black River Riparian Forest to the southwest of Wetland B across the BNSF Railroad right-of-way and under Renton's shoreline jurisdiction. Because all of the proposed work associated with the subject project lies at least 193 feet from Wetland B (well outside even a 150 -foot -wide buffer), there is no need to definitively ascertain whether or not Wetland B is hydraulically connected to the existing wetlands in the Black River Riparian Forest. The unnamed stream flows from north to south across the eastern part of the site into Wetland B. The stream channel is incised to a depth of 3 to 5 feet. The channel drops 64 feet in elevation from a culvert up the slope within the Pointe Herron LLC parcel south of SW Sunset Boulevard down to the north edge of Wetland B, resulting in an average slope of greater than 20% for 315 lineal feet of stream channel. On page 13 of Raedeke's Wetland & Stream Delineation Update 2014 technical memorandum, Raedeke explains that (1) This stream is a non -salmonid -bearing stream that is (a) intermittent during normal years of rainfall, (b) not mapped on RMC 4-3-0500, Figure August 18, 2014 Project Narrative Pointe Heron LLC Q4, Renton Water Class Map as Class 2 or Class 3, and (c) is not classified by the City of Renton or the State of Washington as a "Shoreline of the State", (2) This stream is a Class 4 water under RMC 4-3-050L1a(iv); and (3) Under RMC 4-3-0501_5a(i)(c) a 35 -foot -wide code -specified buffer exists on both sides of the stream [except where a segment of the stream passes through a protected slope area as depicted on Sheets E1, E3, and E6 of the Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Grading, Interim Drainage, E.S.C, and Rehabilitation Plans for the subject project (because of RMC 4-3-050L5b(ii), the code -specified stream buffer along that segment of the stream extends to the protected slope's boundary)]. Steep Slopes Renton Municipal Code Section 4-3-050J1a(ii) classifies steep slopes as either sensitive or protected. More particularly, RMC 4-11-190 defines steep slopes (and the protected slope and sensitive slope subclassifications) as follows: SLOPE, STEEP: A hillside, or portion thereof, which falls into one of two (2) classes of slope, sensitive or protected. A. Slope, Protected: A hillside, or portion thereof, with an average slope, as identified in the City of Renton Steep Slope Atlas or in a method approved by the City, of forty percent (40%) or greater grade and having a minimum vertical rise of fifteen feet (15). B. Slope, Sensitive: A hillside, or portion thereof, characterized by: (1) an average slope, as identified in the City of Renton Steep Slope Atlas or in a method approved by the City, of twenty five percent (25%) to less than forty percent (40%); or (2) an average slope, as identified in the City of Renton Steep Slope Atlas or in a method approved by the City, of forty percent (40%) or greater with a vertical rise of less than fifteen feet (15'), abutting an average slope, as identified in the City of Renton Steep Slope Atlas or in a method approved by the City, of twenty five percent (25%) to forty percent (40%). This definition excludes engineered retaining walls. August 18, 2014 Project Narrative Pointe Heron LLC (Italics added.) In regard to the location of steep slopes on a site, subsection i (Steep Slope Delineation Procedure) of RMC 4-3-050J1a (Steep Slopes) states: I. Steep Slope Delineation Procedure: The boundaries of a regulated steep sensitive or protected slope are determined to be in the location identified on the City of Renton's Steep Slope Atlas. An applicant's qualified professional may substitute boundaries independently derived from survey data for the City's consideration in determining the boundaries of sensitive or protected steep slopes. All topographic maps shall utilize two foot (2') contour intervals or the standard utilized in the City of Renton Steep Slope Atlas. (Underlining and italics added.) The City of Renton has delineated areas of steep slopes (both sensitive and protected slopes) on the City's Steep Slope Hazard Atlas. Those delineated steep slope areas (along with areas of slopes that are greater than 15 percent and less than or equal to 25 percent) are depicted on the City's regulated slopes overlay that is part of the City's GIS system that is publicly accessible through the City of Renton website. Accompanying this application is an 11" by 17" color map exhibit generated from the City's GIS system for the Pointe Heron LLC parcel with the regulated slopes overlay turned on (the "Regulated Slopes Map"). On that map both (1) the Pointe Heron LLC parcel boundaries have been outlined with a thick black line and (2) the limits of the project site for the proposed fill, excavation, and grading project have been outlined with a thick dashed line. That map makes clear that no protected slopes lie within the project site, although the map depicts four areas of protected slopes within the portion of the subject parcel to the east of the project site. Sheet E1 (the Cover Sheet) of the Grading, Interim Drainage, E.S.C, and Rehabilitation Plans for the subject project depicts those four areas of protected slopes and their approximate respective square footages: namely, from west to east, Protected Slope Area 1 (which encompasses approximately 5,299 square feet), Protected Slope Area 2 (which encompasses approximately 68,936 square feet), Protected Slope Area 3 (which encompasses approximately 2,241 square feet), and Protected Slope Area 4 (which encompasses approximately 1,532 square feet). Sheet El depicts the minimum distance (110 feet) between the westerlymost protected slope area (Protected Slope Area 1) and the nearest (eastern) edge of the project site. The Regulated Slopes Map indicates 15% to 25% slopes across nearly all of the proposed project site area and also indicates some small areas of sensitive steep slopes in the proposed project site, primarily in the western half of the project site. The map depicts in white the remaining, scattered small portions of the project site, with the white portions intended to indicate areas of 15 percent or lesser slopes. 6 August 18, 2014 Project Narrative Pointe Heron LLC Black River Riparian Forest to the South of the Project Site Although not part of the project site or the parcel that the project site lies within, the Black River Riparian Forest (BRRF), which lies to the south of the 100 -foot wide BNSR Railroad right- of-way that abuts a portion of the project site's south edge, is a known critical habitat area. In the 2014 Great Blue Heron & Wildlife Habitat Update prepared by Raedeke Associates, Inc. in relation to the QIP/Sunset Bluff (MLDC) Properties (including the subject Pointe Heron LLC parce12) in relation to the proposed Point Heron Filling Excavation, and Grading Project and dated August 13, 2014, Raedeke provides the following summary of impacts on Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat at the bottom of page 10: Summary of Impacts on Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat As noted above, the proposed fill, excavation, and grading project would be located entirely within a portion of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel (MLDC Property) that is highly disturbed and consists largely of bare ground, and is outside the forested habitat of the BRRF. Consequently, we anticipate no adverse impacts to the forested habitat of the BRRF. In addition, the project would have no adverse impacts on the former heron colony within the BRRF or either of the known eagle nest sites in the vicinity (one of which was in the BRRF), as these sites have not been occupied for several years and no longer appear to be active. Even if the heron colony and nearest eagle nest sites were active, the proposed grade and fill project site lies well outside of standard setbacks recommended by WDFW to protect heron colonies and the USFWS to protect eagle nest sites. The proposed grading would eliminate a small area of shrubs and sapling trees and would remove an existing stormwater pond, which would result in only minimal impacts to existing wildlife habitat on site. In summary, the proposed fill, excavation, and grading project would not result in probable significant adverse impacts to wildlife or wildlife habitat. Z Because (a) Raedeke had previously studied what is now the Pointe Heron LLC parcel while it was owned by Merlino Land Development Co. and (b) Raedeke's prior (2009) reports referred to what is now the Pointe Heron LLC parcel as the "MLDC Property," for continuity with Raedeke's 2009 reports, in the 2014 Great Blue Heron & Wildlife Habitat Update Raedeke sometimes refers to the Pointe Heron LLC parcel as the MLDC Property. August 18, 2014 Project Narrative Pointe Heron LLC Statement addressing soil type and drainage conditions: Soil Types Native soil within the project site generally ranged from outwash sand and gravel to glacial drift including silt, sand and gravel. However, because there have been significant modifications to the original site grades as part of site filling and grading for the previously planned Sunset Bluff residential subdivision development project, very little, if any, native soil is expected to be exposed during grading activities associated with the proposal. Structural fill placed as part of the Sunset Bluff project's filling and grading is present within the currently proposed filling, excavation, and grading project site. For a graphical comparison of (1) the Sunset Bluff project's design grades contemplated by the Clearing, Initial Grading, and TESC Plans for Sunset Bluff that the City approved on October 4, 2005, (2) approximate existing ground elevations, and (3) the currently proposed design grades within the filling, excavation, and grading project site, see the accompanying 8/13/2014 six -sheet reduced -size (11" by 17") set of Cross -Section Exhibit drawings (Sheets X1 through X6) prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Surface drainage conditions Surface water runoff from the project site current drains into the existing stormwater detention and water quality pond constructed in conjunction with site grading work performed for the previously planned Sunset Bluff residential development project. The existing pond's flow control manhole drains into a storm drain pipe that connects into an existing storm manhole at the Pointe Heron LLC parcel's south boundary (the common boundary between the Pointe Heron parcel and the railroad right-of-way). At the outlet side of that existing manhole, an existing 18 -inch -diameter storm drain pipe conveys the pond's discharge water to the south under the railroad grade into the Black River Riparian Forest property owned by the City of Renton. Groundwater conditions Page 7 of Earth Solutions NW's August 13, 2014 Geotechnical and Soil Engineering Report in Support of Proposed Fill, Excavation, and Grade Pointe Heron LLC Parcel (the "Geotechnical Report") explains: Groundwater seepage zones are present in or near and under the project site, and subsurface drain systems have already been installed to control the flow of these sources. In view of the varied nature of the existing fill on the site and 8 August 18, 2014 Project Narrative Pointe Heron LLC previous engineered modifications to portions of the site topography, minor perched groundwater may be encountered during the wetter winter months, but no groundwater table will ... be exposed or interrupted. Proposed use of the property and scope of the proposed development: The proposed filling, excavation, and grading project is primarily intended to create within a portion of the 14.14 -acre project site at elevations ranging between about 125 and 128 feet a relatively flat area for future development. That relatively flat area is proposed to extend south from roughly the toe of the existing slope that extends downward from the south edge of SW Sunset Boulevard. The 125 -to -128 -foot grade range is a roughly mid-level grade range between (1) the average of the existing elevations (an average of about 193 feet) of the segment of SW Sunset Boulevard lying to the north of the project site, elevations that range from (a) about 164 feet to the north of the project site's east end to (b) about 222 feet to the north of the project site's west end, and (2) the average (an average of about 45 feet) of the existing elevations of the south boundary of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel along or to the south of the project site (elevations that generally range from about 40 to 50 feet). As more fully explained below, in order to vertically intersect with the south edge of the proposed relatively flat area, a proposed 1.5H:1V engineered fill slope with a buttress fill face will extend up from either (i) the parcel's south boundary (along the central part of that boundary) or (ii) the top edge of the existing 1.5H:1V engineered fill slopes along the parcel's south boundary that lie to both the west and east of the central part of the boundary. As part of the proposed work, the existing stormwater detention and water quality pond, which is located at the lower (south) edge of the project site, is proposed to be filled and replaced with a new stormwater detention and water quality pond to be constructed along much of the proposed plateau area's northern edge. That proposed new pond will afford easier access for pond maintenance than does the existing stormwater and water quality pond at the base of existing slopes. The proposed changes to the project site's existing grades will eliminate the undulating terrain that resulted from the previous grading of the project site performed as part of the Sunset Bluff project, grading that was not completed due to the collapse of the residential development market that started around 2008. The project will involve approximately 495,500 cubic yards of fill and approximately 18,200 cubic yards of cut, for a net fill volume of approximately 477,300 cubic yards of structural fill materials to be imported. The imported fill materials will be hauled into the project site either (1) from stockpiles of structural fill materials stored on the Stoneway Black River Quarry property, property that abuts the southerly part of the west boundary of the subject Pointe Heron LLC parcel, or (2) through the Stoneway Black River Quarry property from the quarry property's entrance roadway at Monster Road SW. The overall grading actives will involve 9 August 18, 2014 Project Narrative Pointe Heron LLC compaction of structural fill and, along the project site's south and west edges, construction of engineered fill slopes. The work is proposed to be done in two phases. The Phase 1 portion of the proposal is to involve both (1) filling of the existing stormwater detention and water quality pond located near the site's south boundary and (2) filling of the adjacent areas of the project site in order raise site grades to an interim elevation of approximately 110 feet. Phase 1 is also to involve construction of a new interim detention and water quality pond with a bottom elevation of 100 feet and an overflow elevation of 109 feet. The Phase 1 work will involve roughly 267,000 cubic yards of fill. The lower portion of an engineered 1.5H to 1V fill slope (up to an elevation of approximately 111 feet) will be constructed along the south side of the site over the existing pond and will close the gap between the existing engineered fill slopes along the south edge of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel to the east and west. The interim detention pond will provide the required detention for level 2 flow control for the proposed site conditions and will also serve as a temporary sediment pond. As noted on Sheet E3 of the 10 -sheet set of Grading, Interim Drainage, E.S.C., and Rehabilitation Plans (the "Grading Plans"), the southerly top edge of this pond will be setback to the north from the interim Phase 1 top of the proposed engineered fill slope by a minimum of 80 feet unless the project's geotechnical engineer approves otherwise. This interim pond is to be in place and operational by October 1 following the first season of the filling and grading operation. After both (a) the permanent stormwater pond (described in the next paragraph as part of the Phase 2 construction) has been constructed and is operational and (b) most of the relatively flat area described in the first paragraph, above, has been filled to its final Phase 2 design height so that runoff from that area of the plateau will drain into the permanent stormwater pond, the interim pond is to be filled with compacted structural fill. The Phase 1 work will involve approximately 267,000 cubic yards of fill but no excavation (unless work on the permanent pond starts early, in which case the approximately 18,200 cubic yards of excavation for the permanent pond could be done as part of the Phase 1 portion of the project). During the Phase 2 portion of the project, (1) a proposed stormwater pond (designed to be permanent) will be excavated from a segment of the northern portion of the existing plateau portion of the project site (if this pond by then has not already been excavated during Phase 1), (2) the area of the Phase 1 interim detention pond will be filled to final grade, (3) the upper portion of the engineered fill slopes will be completed, and (4) the remainder of the project site will be filled to final grade, which will result in the proposed, relatively flat area of the project site having elevations ranging from 125 to 128 feet as depicted on the Grading Plans. The Phase 2 work will involve approximately 18,200 cubic yards of excavation (excavation for the permanent pond) and approximately 228,500 cubic yards of fill for a net fill of roughly 210,000 10 August 18, 2014 Project Narrative Pointe Heron LLC cubic yards. The Phase 2 work is expected to be completed during the overall project's second or third construction season. As is also shown on the grading plans, a new 2.6H:1V engineered fill slope is proposed along a portion of the project site's west edge. To avoid increasing the potential for instability or impacts to adjacent or abutting properties beyond pre -development conditions, the design of the proposed fill as set forth in the Geotechnical Report specifies (among other things) the use of (1) compacted structural fill materials throughout the proposed fill; (2) a crushed aggregate buttress fill zone ranging in horizontal dimension from 35 feet (at the fill slope toe) to 5 feet (at the fill slope top) along the face of the proposed 1.5H:1V fill slopes (with the crushed aggregate buttress fill zone to be comprised of material meeting the buttress fill material specification set forth on pages 7 and 8 of the Geotechnical Report, material intended to both enhance slope strength and stability and prevent accumulation of surface water runoff from the fill slope's face); and (3) geogrid reinforcement of the proposed 1.5H:1V fill slopes to further increase slope strength and stability. As specified on the Grading Plans, once the proposed filling and grading is completed, (1) the surface slope of the flat area will direct all of its stormwater runoff to the new stormwater detention/water quality pond at the project site's north edge and (2) the finished grade areas that lie outside of the stormwater detention and water quality pond and outside of the engineered fill slopes shall be surfaced with a six-inch minimum compacted depth of crushed aggregate for interim site rehabilitation and to prevent erosion. The six-inch minimum compacted depth of crushed aggregate is the same type and depth of surfacing that was placed on the previously -graded portion of the project site, a surfacing that fully stabilized the previously -graded portion from erosion. As once again proposed, it will provide full stabilization against erosion and will thereby eliminate the need for interim landscaping or hydroseeding of the project site. As discussed on page 34 of the Geotechnical Report, the proposed crushed aggregate buttress fill along the slope face will not only be excellent for providing slope stability and preventing 11 August 18, 2014 Project Narrative Pointe Heron LLC slope erosion, it will also provide a porous, nonerosive aggregate facing of the proposed slope face, a facing that will be excellent for vertically transmitting and dispersing through the crushed aggregate buttress zone both (1) rainwater that strikes the slope's face and (2) any hillside perched groundwater that may seep into the buttress fill zone from the fill core. This will eliminate any need for terracing the fill slope. Because of the porous, nonerosive characteristics of the proposed fill slope face, vegetation of the slope face will not be needed to prevent erosion and, because the facing will not be conducive to landscaping, other plantings, or hydroseeding, vegetation of the slope face will not be appropriate and is not being proposed. The subject proposed fill, excavation, and grade project is the initial phase of a multiphase overall site development project. In this initial phase, the portion of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel within the project site will be reconfigured to the grade proposed as part of the subject grade and fill permit application. As part of one or more later expected site development phases, further grading modifications are expected, the extent of which will depend on the particular details of the ultimate future development proposed. That being the case, ultimate landscape design and installation cannot be determined and installed until a final site use is determined and a particular development for such site use is designed on behalf of the property owner and approved by the City. The linear configuration of the proposed new stormwater detention and water quality pond is similar to the linear configuration of the existing stormwater detention and water quality pond. Unlike the existing pond, which was designed to meet the requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Manual, the proposed new pond is designed to meet the requirements set forth in the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and 2009 City of Renton amendments to that manual. Access: Construction access to the project site is proposed through the Stoneway Black River Quarry property from the quarry property's entrance roadway at Monster Road SW. Proposed off-site improvements (i.e. installation of sidewalks, fire hydrants, sewer main, etc.): No offsite improvements are proposed as part of the subject filling, excavation, and grading project. Total estimated construction cost and estimated fair market value of the proposal: 12 August 18, 2014 Project Narrative Pointe Heron LLC The total estimated construction cost and estimated fair market value of the proposed filling, excavation, and grading project is $1.0 Million. Estimated quantities and type of materials involved if any fill or excavation is proposed: As noted above, the project will involve approximately 495,500 cubic yards of structural fill material and approximately 18,200 cubic yards of cut for a net anticipated fill of approximately 477,300 cubic yards. The specifications for the two categories of structural fill that are proposed for the project as set forth on pages 7 to 9 of the Geotechnical Report are as follows: Two categories of structural fill are proposed for the subject fill and grade project: (1) a crushed aggregate fill to be used to construct a buttress fill zone along the face of the proposed fill slopes and (2) a fill to be used to construct the proposed fill core behind the crushed aggregate buttress fill zone. (See Plate 3 for a schematic depiction of the buttress fill zone and the core structural fill zone behind it.) Both of these categories of structural fill must conform to RMC 4-4- 060N4 (FILL MATERIAL), which states in relevant part: Fill materials shall have no more than minor amounts of organic substances and shall have no rock or similar irreducible material with a maximum dimension greater than eight inches (8"). Fill material shall meet the following requirements: a. Construction, Demolition, and Land Clearing Waste Prohibited: Fill material shall be free of construction, demolition, and land clearing waste except that this requirement does not preclude the use of recycled concrete rubble per Washington State Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction. b. Cleanliness of Fill Material: Fill material shall not contain concentrations of contaminants that exceed cleanup standards for soil specified in WAC 173-340-740, Model Toxics Control Act. 13 August 18, 2014 Project Narrative Pointe Heron LLC In addition to conforming to RMC 4-4-060N4 (FILL MATERIAL), each of the two categories of fill material must conform to the respective applicable technical specifications set forth below. Buttress Fill Material Specification Material to be used to construct the buttress fill zone along the face of the proposed fill slopes shall be crushed aggregate conforming to RMC 4-4-060N4 (FILL MATERIAL) and conforming to the following strength parameters: Internal angle of friction 46° minimum Moist unit weight 145 pcf minimum Maximum aggregate size 8 inches Maximum fines content (passing U.S. Sieve No. 200) shall not exceed 5 percent. This specified material, which is equivalent to coarse gravel and/or cobble, must be well -graded and angular (crushed). Samples of this proposed fill material must be provided to ESNW for laboratory analysis and approval prior to placement. Core Structural Fill Material Specification Material to be used to construct the proposed fill core to be placed behind the crushed aggregate buttress zone fill shall conform to the following strength parameters: Internal angle of friction 36° minimum Moist unit weight 125 pcf minimum Maximum aggregate size 8 inches Maximum fines content (passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve) shall not exceed 20 percent. 14 August 18, 2014 Project Narrative Pointe Heron LLC Samples of this proposed fill material must be provided to ESNW for laboratory analysis and approval prior to placement. In regard to the relatively small quantity of material to be excavated, page 39 of the Geotechnical Report states as follows: [E]xcept for the relatively small volume of material to be excavated for construction of the proposed Permanent Stormwater Pond, none of the site is proposed to be excavated. Successful use of the limited volume of those excavated on-site soils will largely be dictated by the moisture content of the soils at the time of placement and compaction. Use of onsite soils from site excavations for structural fill material may require moisture conditioning prior to placement and compaction if the material has greater than optimum moisture content. Moisture conditioning would likely include passive measures such as aeration for overly moist soils and addition of water for overly dry soils prior to placement. These moisture conditioning methods would not affect water quality on the project site or the quality of water that may be discharged from the project site. Trees to be removed: As a result of the prior grading, only sapling trees remain on the project site, and those trees are in only a small area of the project site. Those trees all have a caliper of less than two inches at breast height. Those sapling trees are proposed to be removed as part of the project. Explanation of any land to be dedicated to the City: No land is proposed to be dedicated to the City as part of the proposed project. Any proposed job shacks, sales trailers, and/or model homes: No job shacks, sales trailers, and/or model homes are planned as part of the proposed project. Any proposed modifications being requested (include written lustificationl: No modifications are being requested as part of the project. 15 August 18, 2014 Project Narrative Pointe Heron LLC For projects located within 100 feet of a stream or wetland, please include: Distance in feet from the wetland or stream to the nearest area of work Wetland A, which is a Category 3 Wetland and has a 25 -foot -wide buffer, is located 37 feet to the nearest area of work. Wetland B, which is either (1) a Category 3 wetland (with a 25 -foot -wide buffer) under Renton's critical area regulations if the wetland is not hydraulically connected to the existing wetlands in the Black River Riparian Forest to the southwest of Wetland B across the BNSF Railroad right-of- way or (2) a Category II wetland (with a 150 -foot -wide buffer) under Renton's shoreline master program critical area regulations if the wetland is hydraulically connected to the existing wetlands in the Black River Riparian Forest to the southwest of Wetland B across the BNSF Railroad right-of-way and under Renton's shoreline jurisdiction, is located 193 feet to the nearest area of work. The unnamed Existing Class 4 Stream, which has a 35 -foot -wide buffer, is located 100 feet to the nearest area of work. Note: The project is not located within 200 -feet of the Black River, Cedar River, Springbrook Creek, May Creek, or Lake Washington. 16 August 18, 2014 DEPARTMENT OF CO..i.VIUNITY "it%°i AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT J PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, WA 98057 RECEIVED Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 JAN 232015 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not apply" onlv when you can explain why it does not aooly and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. INSTRUCTIONS FOR LEAD AGENCIES: Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron rilling, Excavation, and Grading Project For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B even though questions may be answered "does not apply". In addition the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should be read as "proposal", "proponent", and "affected geographic area" respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non -projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements —that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project 2. Name of applicant: Pointe Heron LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Contact Person: Jimmy Blais Address: 5050 1st Ave South, Suite 102, Seattle, WA 98134 Phone Numbers: Of: 206-762-9125 C: 206-255-5153 Email: JBlais@gmccinc.com 4. Date checklist prepared: August 16, 2014 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Planning Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Grading would start in March 2015. The project is projected to take place over a two -to -three-year period. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. None at this time. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. -2- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron rilling, Excavation, and Grading Project (a) Raedeke Associates, Inc.'s Q!P/Virtu/Sunset Bluff (MLOC) Properties Wetland & Stream Delineation Update 2014 Technical Memorandum (August 13, 2014) (concerns the Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project); (b) Raedeke Associates, Inc.'s QIP/Sunset Bluff (MLDC) Properties Now Owned by Pointe Heron LLC– 2014 Great Blue Heron & Wildlife Habitat Update (August 13, 2014) Technical Memorandum (concerns the Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project); (c) Earth Solutions NW, LLC's Geotechnical and Soil Engineering Report in Support of Proposed Fill, Excavation, and Grade, Pointe Heron LLC Parcel, Renton, Washington (August 13, 2014) (sometimes referred to below as the "Geotechnical Report"); and (d) Earghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.'s Technical Information Report— Grading, Interim Drainage, and Erosion Control (Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project) (August 2014). 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. A Special Fill and Grade Permit from the Renton Hearing Examiner. An Annual Grading License from the Renton Development Services Division. Approval from the Renton Development Services Division pursuant to RMC 4-4-030C2 (Haul Hours) (and/or pursuant to any other applicable portion(s) of the Renton Municipal Code) for haul hours to and from the project site between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and between 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on Saturdays. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Within a large portion of the approximately 14.12 -acre project site (a project site that lies within an approximately 26.26 -acre parcel of land owned by Pointe Heron LLC), the proposed filling, excavation, and grading project is intended to create a relatively flat area for future development at surface elevations ranging -3- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project from between about 125 and 128 feet. That relatively flat area is proposed to extend south from roughly the toe of the existing slope that extends downward from the south edge of SW Sunset Boulevard in Renton. The 125 -to -128 -foot grade range is a roughly mid-level grade range between (1) the average of the existing elevations (an average of about 193 feet) of the segment of SW Sunset Boulevard lying to the north of the project site, elevations that range from (a) about 164 feet to the north of the project site's east end to (b) about 222 feet to the north of the project site's west end, and (2) the average (an average of about 45 feet) of the existing elevations of the south boundary of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel along or to the south of the project site (elevations that generally range from about 40 to 50 feet). In order to vertically intersect with the south edge of the proposed relatively flat area, a proposed 1.5H:1V engineered fill slope with a buttress fill face (comprised of material described in Section B.1.e, below) will extend upward and northward as shown on the project's grading plans from either (i) the parcel's south boundary (along the west -central part of that boundary) or (ii) the top edge of the existing 1.SH:1V engineered fill slopes along the parcel's south boundary that lie to both the west and east of the west -central part of the boundary. Also, in order to vertically intersect with the west edge of the proposed relatively flat area, a proposed 2.6H:1V engineered fill slope will extend upward and northward as shown on the project's grading plans from the parcel's west boundary. As part of the proposed work, the existing stormwater detention and water quality pond, which is located at the lower (south) edge of the west -central part of the project site is proposed to be filled and replaced (as part of the Phase 2 portion of the proposal described below) with a new, more accessible stormwater detention and water quality pond to be constructed along much of the proposed flat area's northern edge. That proposed pond will afford easier access for pond maintenance than does the existing stormwater and water quality pond at the base of existing slopes. The proposed changes to the project site's existing grades will eliminate the undulating terrain that resulted from the previous grading of the project site performed as part of the Sunset Bluff residential subdivision project, grading that was not completed due to the collapse of the residential development market that started around 2008. The work is proposed to be done in two phases. The Phase 1 portion of the proposal is to involve both (1) filling of the existing stormwater detention and water quality pond located near the site's south boundary and (2) filling of the adjacent areas of the project site in order raise site grades to an interim elevation of approximately 110 feet. Phase 1 is also to involve construction of a new interim detention and water quality pond with a bottom elevation of 100 feet and an overflow elevation of 109 feet. The Phase 1 work will involve roughly 267,000 cubic yards of fill. The lower portion of an engineered 1.5H to -4- Enviromncntal Checklist Pointe Heron rilling, Excavation, and Grading Project 1V fill slope (up to an elevation of approximately 111 feet) will be constructed along the south side of the site over the existing pond and will close the gap between the existing engineered fill slopes along the south edge of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel to the east and west. The interim detention pond will provide the required detention for level 2 flow control for the proposed site conditions and will also serve as a temporary sediment pond. As noted on Sheet E3 of the 10 -sheet set of Grading, Interim Drainage, E.S.C., and Rehabilitation Plans (the "Grading Plans"), the southerly top edge of this pond will be set back to the north from the interim Phase 1 top of the proposed engineered fill slope by a minimum of 80 feet unless the project's geotechnical engineer approves otherwise. This interim pond is to be in place and operational by October 1 following the first season of the filling and grading operation. After both (a) the permanent stormwater pond (described in the next paragraph as part of the Phase 2 construction) has been constructed and is operational and (b) most of the relatively flat area described in the first paragraph, above, has been filled to its final Phase 2 design height so that runoff from that area of the plateau will drain into the permanent stormwater pond, the interim pond is to be filled with compacted structural fill. The Phase 1 work will involve approximately 267,000 cubic yards of fill but no excavation (unless work on the permanent pond starts early, in which case the approximately 18,200 cubic yards of excavation for the permanent pond could be done as part of the Phase 1 portion of the project). During the Phase 2 portion of the project, (1) a proposed stormwater pond (designed to be permanent) will be excavated from a segment of the northern portion of the existing plateau portion of the project site (if this pond by then has not already been excavated during Phase 1), (2) the area of the Phase 1 interim detention pond will be filled to final grade, (3) the upper portion of the engineered fill slopes will be completed, and (4) the remainder of the project site will be filled to final grade, which will result in the proposed, relatively flat area of the project site having elevations ranging from 125 to 128 feet as depicted on the Grading Plans. The Phase 2 work will involve approximately 18,200 cubic yards of excavation (excavation for the permanent pond) and approximately 228,500 cubic yards of fill for a net fill of roughly 210,000 cubic yards. The Phase 2 work is expected to be completed during the overall project's second or third construction season. The overall project will involve approximately 495,500 cubic yards of fill and approximately 18,200 cubic yards of cut for a net fill volume of approximately 477,300 cubic yards of structural fill materials to be imported. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans -5- Envirorunental Checklist Pointe Heron Tilling, Excavation. and Grading Project required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The address of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel on which the subject project site (work area limits) is situated is 1101 SW Sunset Boulevard Renton, WA 98057. The parcel is located within the south half of Section 13, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. and is situated between SW Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) to the north and the BNSF Railroad right-of-way to the south, and between (a) the forested westerly end of the existing Sunpointe Townhomes Condominium development property to the east and (b) the Sunset View Apartments and the Black River Quarry parcels to the west. The parcel, which has been assigned King County Assessor's Parcel Number 132304-9010, is legally described as follows: Lot 1 of the SR 900 L.L.C. Lot Line Adjustment (City of Renton File No. LUA-03-124-LLA) as recorded in Volume 168 of Surveys, pages 233 through 235, under Recording No. 20040311900015, records of King County, Washington. Attached at the end of this environmental checklist as Exhibits A through G are letter -size versions of the following maps and drawings: (1) A Vicinity Map—Exhibit A; (2) A color Neighborhood Detail Map—Exhibit B; (3) The two -sheet Topographic Map—Exhibit C; (4) The 10 -sheet set of Grading, Interim Drainage, E.S.C., and Rehabilitation Plans (the "Grading Plans")—Exhibit D; (5) A color schematic depiction of the proposed buttress fill zone and the proposed core structural fill zone behind it—Exhibit E (6) The two -sheet color Wetlands and Stream Map—Exhibit F and (7) A color Pointe Heron LLC Parcel with City of Renton Wetlands map—Exhibit G. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rollin hilly, eep slopes, mountainous, other: -6- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron rilling, Excavation, and Grading Project The 14.12 -acre project site can generally be described as hilly with some steep slopes. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The steepest slope on the project site is approximately 67%. C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. The native soil within the project site generally ranged from outwash sand and gravel to glacial drift including silt, sand, and gravel. However, because there have been significant modifications to the original site grades as part of site filling and grading for the previously planned Sunset Bluff residential subdivision development project on the subject Pointe Heron LLC parcel, very little, if any, native soil is expected to be exposed during grading activities associated with the proposal. Extensive areas of structural fill placed as part of the Sunset Bluff project's filling and grading are present within the project site. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No, not within the 14.12 -acre project site or its immediate vicinity. However, an approximately 0.92 -acre historical landslide feature lies approximately 500 feet to the east-southeast of the project site and about 70 feet south of the SW Sunset Boulevard right-of-way. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. For an explanation of the purpose of the proposed filling and grading, see Section A.11, above. To achieve the proposed grades shown on the proposal's grading plans, the project will involve approximately 495,500 cubic yards (approximately 743,000 tons) of fill and approximately 13,200 cubic yards of cut (approximately 27,000 tons), for a net fill volume of approximately 477,300 cubic yards (approximately 716,000 tons) of structural fill materials to be imported. The imported structural fill materials will be hauled into the project site both (1) from stockpiles of structural fill materials stored on the Stoneway Black River Quarry property (property that abuts the southerly part of the west boundary of the subject Pointe Heron LLC parcel) and (2) through the Stoneway Black River Quarry property from the quarry property's entrance roadway at Monster Road SW for structural fill material obtained from other (as of yet unknown) sources. -7- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Gradine Project The overall grading activities will involve compaction of structural fill and, along the project site's south and west edges, construction of engineered fill slopes. The specifications for the two categories of structural fill that are proposed for the project as set forth on pages 7 to 9 of the Geotechnical Report are as follows: Two categories of structural fill are proposed for the subject fill and grade project: (1) a crushed aggregate fill to be used to construct a buttress fill zone along the face of the proposed fill slopes and (2) a fill to be used to construct the proposed fill core behind the crushed aggregate buttress fill zone. (See Plate 3 for a schematic depiction of the buttress fill zone and the core structural fill zone behind it.) Both of these categories of structural fill must conform to RMC 4-4-060N4 (FILL MATERIAL), which states in relevant part: Fill materials shall have no more than minor amounts of organic substances and shall have no rock or similar irreducible material with a maximum dimension greater than eight inches (8"). Fill material shall meet the following requirements: a. Construction, Demolition, and Land Clearing Waste Prohibited: Fill material shall be free of construction, demolition, and land clearing waste except that this requirement does not preclude the use of recycled concrete rubble per Washington State Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction. b. Cleanliness of Fill Material: Fill material shall not contain concentrations of contaminants that exceed cleanup standards for soil specified in WAC 173-340- 740, Model Toxics Control Act. In addition to conforming to RMC 4-4-060N4 (FILL MATERIAL), each of the two categories of fill material must conform to the respective applicable technical specifications set forth below. Buttress Fill Material Specification Material to be used to construct the buttress fill zone along the face of the proposed fill slopes shall be crushed aggregate conforming to RMC 4-4-060N4 (FILL MATERIAL) and conforming to the following strength parameters: -8- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron rilling, Excavation, and Grading Project Internal angle of friction 46° minimum Moist unit weight 145 pcf minimum Maximum aggregate size 8 inches Maximum fines content (passing U.S. Sieve No. 200) shall not exceed 5 percent. This specified material, which is equivalent to coarse gravel and/or cobble, must be well -graded and angular (crushed). Samples of this proposed fill material must be provided to ESNW for laboratory analysis and approval prior to placement. Core Structural Fill Material Specification Material to be used to construct the proposed fill core to be placed behind the crushed aggregate buttress zone fill shall conform to the following strength parameters: Internal angle of friction 36° minimum Moist unit weight 125 pcf minimum Maximum aggregate size 8 inches Maximum fines content (passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve) shall not exceed 20 percent. Samples of this proposed fill material must be provided to ESNW for laboratory analysis and approval prior to placement. In regard to the relatively small quantity of material to be excavated, page 39 of the Geotechnical Report states as follows: [E]xcept for the relatively small volume of material to be excavated for construction of the proposed Permanent Stormwater Pond, none of the site is proposed to be excavated. Successful use of the limited volume of those excavated on-site soils will largely be dictated by the moisture content of the soils at the time of placement and compaction. Use of onsite soils from site excavations for structural fill material may require moisture conditioning prior to placement and compaction if the material has greater than optimum moisture content. Moisture -9- Envirormnental Checklist Pointe Heron tilling, Excavation, and Grading Project conditioning would likely include passive measures such as aeration for overly moist soils and addition of water for overly dry soils prior to placement. These moisture conditioning methods would not affect water quality on the project site or the quality of water that may be discharged from the project site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Throughout the filling, excavation, and grading process on the subject project site, soils will from time to time be exposed, increasing the potential for erosion. However, the faces of fill and cut slopes shall be maintained to control and protect against erosion. The faces of the proposed engineered fill slopes will be constructed with the buttress fill material described in Section 6.1.e, above, a material that will have porous, nonerosive characteristics and act as a protective measure. Protective control measures for the faces of the relatively small areas of cut slopes may consist of effective planting, protective covering such as plastic sheets, and interceptor trenches equipped with check dams, to divert water in such a way that it minimizes erosion potential. The protective measures shall be installed as soon as practicable. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? In this case, at the completion of the filling, excavation, and grading project, (1) nearly all of the relatively flat portion of the project site will have a six-inch minimum compacted depth of crushed aggregate for interim site rehabilitation and erosion control, which is a semi -pervious surface and (2) the proposed engineered fill slopes will have a porous buttress fill face. Thus, at the completion of the filling, excavation, and grading project, none of the project site is expected to be impervious. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Erosion control measures have been specified on the both (1) the above - referenced 10 -sheet set of Grading, Interim Drainage, E.S.C., and Rehabilitation Plans for the proposed (the "Grading Plans") and (2) Earth Solutions NW, LLC's August 13, 2014 Geotechnical and Soil Engineering Report in Support of Proposed Fill, Excavation, and Grade, Pointe Heron LLC Parcel, Renton, Washington. More generally, erosion and sediment control measures will conform to the standards set by the Washington State Department of Ecology's Construction Stormwater General Permit. Finished grade areas that are outside of the Phase 2 -10- Emirotunental Checklist Pointe Heron rilling, Excavation, and Grading Project stormwater detention and water quality pond and outside of the engineered slopes shall be surfaced with crushed aggregate with a minimum six-inch compacted depth of crushed aggregate for site rehabilitation and to prevent erosion. Other erosion control and protective BMPs that may be used for this project include, but are not limited to, temporary sediment ponds, straw mulching, hydroseeding, additional silt fencing, straw waddles, interceptor trenches, and check dams. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Fugitive dust may be generated from excavating activity and the movement of earthen materials. Also, earthwork equipment, dump trucks, and workers' automobiles operated during construction are all sources of CO2 and NO, emission from the exhaust when operational. Currently, no emissions are anticipated once the project is complete. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. N/A C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: During construction, a water truck may be used during dry periods to keep high the moisture content in surface soils to help control fugitive dust. I WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Raedeke Associates' above -referenced Wetland & Stream Delineation Update 2014 Technical Memorandum identifies and describes in detail two wetlands (Wetlands A and B) that, in part, lie within the overall Pointe Heron LLC parcel within which the project site is located (wetlands that, however, lie entirely outside of the project site itself). Wetland A is located straddling a small westerly segment of the Point Heron LLC parcel's south boundary, while Wetland B is located straddling the south boundary of the eastern portion of the parcel. Raedeke's technical memorandum also identifies and describes in detail Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron Pilling, Excavation, and Grading Project an unnamed, intermittent, non -fish -bearing stream that flows from north to south across the western edge of the deciduous forest on the eastern part of the parcel. In addition, Raedeke's technical memorandum identifies and addresses two off-site wetlands (the West BRRF Wetland and the East BRRF Wetland) in the Black River Riparian Forest in the City -of -Renton -owned property that lies to the south of the BNSF Railroad right-of-way (to the south of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel). The attached two -sheet, reduced -size, color Wetlands and Stream Map shows the location of Wetland A, the portion of Wetland B lying within the Pointe Heron LLC parcel, the unnamed stream, and the northernmost portion of the West BRRF Wetland. In addition, the attached Pointe Heron LLC Parcel with City of Renton Wetlands map shows the location of each of their respective regulatory buffers. The wetlands and the unnamed stream are discussed below. As explained in Raedeke's technical memorandum, Wetland A is situated within an approximately 408 -square -foot depression (including an approximately 150 - square -foot portion within the abutting BNSF Railroad right-of-way). (See sheet 1 of 2 of the Wetlands and Stream Map.) Wetland A is fed by seepage at the toe of a slope at the north wetland boundary and drains into a ditch within the BNSF Railroad right-of-way. The vegetation and soils in Wetland A appear to be regularly disturbed by maintenance of the ditch along the north side of the BNSF railroad right-of-way. Under current (2014) City of Renton code, Raedeke concludes that Wetland A meets the criteria to be a regulated Category 3 wetland with a 25 -foot -wide buffer. As is also explained in Raedeke's technical memorandum, Wetland B is also a depressional wetland. Only approximately 6,078 square feet of it are located within the Pointe Heron LLC parcel and an additional approximately 2 -acre portion of it lies off-site on the parcel of land to the southeast of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel and east of the BNSF Railroad right-of-way to the south. (See sheet 2 of 2 of the Wetlands and Stream Map.) Raedeke's technical report concludes that (a) The depression in which Wetland B is located has neither a piped outlet nor a surface water outlet and (b) Wetland B is either (i) a Category 3 wetland (with a 25 - foot -wide buffer) under Renton's critical area regulations if the wetland is not hydraulically connected to the existing wetlands in the Black River Riparian Forest to the southwest of Wetland B across the BNSF Railroad right-of- way or (ii) a Category Il wetland (with a 150 -foot -wide buffer) under Renton's shoreline master program wetland regulations if the wetland is hydraulically connected to the existing wetlands in the Black River Riparian Forest to the -12- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron Pilling, Excavation, and Grading Project southwest of Wetland B across the BNSF Railroad right-of- way and under Renton's shoreline jurisdiction. Because all of the proposed construction work associated with the subject project site lies at least 193 feet from Wetland B (well outside even a 150 -foot - wide buffer—see sheet 2 of 2 of the Wetlands and Stream Map), in regard to the proposed project there is no need to definitively ascertain whether or not Wetland B is hydraulically connected to the existing wetlands in the Black River Riparian Forest. Further, Raedeke's technical memorandum discusses the Unnamed Stream, pointing out that it was flowing at a rate of approximately 1 gallon per second at the time that Raedeke conducted its April 18 and 19, 2013 on-site investigation. On page 13 of Raedeke's technical memorandum, Raedeke explains that: Given its relatively low flow volume, the stream likely does not flow year-round and would be considered to be intermittent. The stream channel is incised to a depth of 3 to 5 feet. The channel drops 64 feet in elevation from a culvert up the slope within the Pointe Heron LLC parcel south of SW Sunset Boulevard down to the north edge of Wetland B, resulting in an average slope of greater than 20% for 315 lineal feet of stream channel. On page 13 of Raedeke's technical memorandum, Raedeke concludes that "[this] unnamed stream that flows into Wetland B meets criteria under RMC 4- 3-050L1a.iv to be Class 4 because it is non -salmonid -bearing stream ... and intermittent during normal years of rainfall" and because: (1) It "is not mapped on RMC 4-3-050Q, Figure Q4, Renton Water Class Map as Class 2 or Class 3"; (2) It "is not classified by the City of Renton or the State of Washington as a 'Shoreline of the State"'; and (3) It "does not meet Class 5 criteria because it (a) does not flow within an artificially created channel where no natural channel had previously existed and (b) is not a surficially isolated water body less than one-half (0.5) acre (e.g., a pond) not meeting the criteria for a wetland as defined under RMC 4-3-050.M." Page 13 of Raedeke's wetlands technical memorandum goes on to explain that, under RMC 4-3-050L5a(i)(c), a 35 -foot -wide code -specified buffer exists on both sides of the unnamed stream [except where a segment of the stream passes through a protected slope area that is depicted on Sheets E1, E3, and E6 of the -13- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron rilling, Excavation, and Grading Project Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Grading, Interim Drainage, E.S.C, and Rehabilitation Plans for the subject project (pointing out that because of RMC 4- 3-0501-5b(ii), the code -specified stream buffer along that segment of the stream extends to the protected slope's boundary)]. As mentioned above, Raedeke's wetlands technical memorandum also addresses the two BRRF wetlands. Page 8 of Raedeke's technical memorandum explains that during April 2013 Raedeke investigated the East BRRF Wetland to determine whether any piped connection existed between it and Wetland B (but found none). Raedeke found that the East BRRF Wetland is dominated by forest vegetation consisting of Pacific willow (Salix lasiandra, FACW), balsam poplar, red alder, red osier, and Sitka willow and found that many small depressions within the wetland were then inundated, and the remainder of the portion of the wetland that Raedeke investigated was saturated to the surface. Page 8 of Raedeke's technical memorandum explains that Raedeke's interpretation of a 1990 aerial photo of the east wetland available online through Google Earth (2014) indicates that the forest vegetation is no more than approximately 30 years old today. Also, page 8 of Raedeke's wetlands technical memorandum explains that in 2004, Raedeke investigated the West BRRF Wetland, a wetland that consists of forest vegetation of varying ages. At the time of Raedeke's 2004 investigation, Raedeke found that (1) the northern portion of this wetland was dominated by 15- to 20 -year-old balsam poplar and (2) the southern portion of the wetland was dominated by mature balsam poplar and Oregon ash trees, many of which were larger than 30 inches diameter at breast height (DBH), growing on numerous hummocks. Page 8 of Raedeke's technical memorandum explains that, "[b]ased on our review of the above -noted aerial photo, the area of mature forest vegetation appears to be between 10 and 15 acres in size." Raedeke points out on page 12 of its wetlands technical memorandum that the Black River Riparian Forest is designated as a Shoreline by the City of Renton and that therefore, when applying a rating system to the two BRRF wetlands, Raedeke used the WDOE (Hruby 2004, as revised 2006, and WDOE 2008) Wetland Rating System for Western Washington. As to the City's rating and buffer for the West BRRF Wetland, based on (1) Raedeke's 2004 investigation of the West BRRF Wetland and (2) the results of Raedeke's review of online natural resource database information in 2014 (see page 12 of Raedeke's wetlands technical memorandum), Raedeke concluded on page 12 that "it is likely that that wetland [the West BRRF Wetland] would meet criteria for a dual rating of Category I for the portion of the wetland that is dominated by mature trees and Category II for the portion dominated by younger trees because the wetland as a whole scored a total of 57 points (with 21 points for habitat functions)." Raedeke then pointed out that "[p]er RMC 4- -14- Enviromnental Checklist Pointe Heron rilling, Excavation, and Grading Project 3-090D2d.iv(c), Category I and Category II wetlands having a moderate habitat function score are provided a minimum buffer of 150 feet." As to the City's rating and buffer for the East BRRF Wetland, page 13 of Raedeke's wetlands technical memorandum explains that (1) "[b]ased on our reconnaissance of the east BRRF wetland, it is likely that it would meet criteria to be regulated as Category III because it scored a total of 40 points (with 16 points for habitat functions)" and (2) "[p]er RMC 4-3-090D2d.iv(c), Category III wetlands that provide low habitat functions (i.e., wetlands that score less than 20 habitat points) are provided a minimum buffer of 75 feet." On page 15 of Raedeke's wetlands technical memorandum, Raedeke explains as follows that the proposed filling, excavation, and grading project will not have direct impacts to the wetlands or the unnamed stream: Wetland A, Wetland B, and the unnamed stream tributary to Wetland B and their respective buffers (including the 150 -foot buffer for Wetland B if Wetland B is in fact hydraulically connected to the wetlands in the Black River Riparian Forest and thus subject to the City's shoreline jurisdiction), as well as buffers for the west and east Black River Riparian Forest wetlands, all lie entirely outside of the proposed project site. The proposed grading plans do not contemplate filling, grading, or other work within Wetland A, Wetland B, or the unnamed tributary stream to Wetland B or any of their respective buffers, or the buffers for the west and east Black River Riparian Forest wetlands. In addition, the proposed upward extension of the existing 1.5H:1V slope from the project site (work area limit) upslope of Wetland A and its buffer will be stable based on the slope's design specifications (Earth Solutions NW, LLC 2014). All construction staging for the proposed grading plan would be outside the wetlands, stream, and their respective buffers. Appropriate BMPs would be implemented to prevent temporary impacts during slope construction. Therefore, direct impacts to these critical areas would be avoided. On pages 15 to 16 of Raedeke's wetlands technical memorandum, Raedeke explains as follows that adverse hydrologic impacts of the proposed filling, excavation, and grading project to Wetland A, Wetland B, and the unnamed stream are not anticipated: Wetland A As discussed above, hydrology to Wetland A appears to be partly provided by discharge of water that infiltrates into the existing pervious -material fill from a small sedimentation pond located 15- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project upslope of the wetland. The remainder of wetland hydrology is likely to be provided from groundwater seepage from native soil strata at the base of the existing fill located several feet upslope from the wetland. Under the proposed grading plan, the sediment pond would be eliminated with the result that hydrologic input to Wetland A is likely to be reduced. However, elimination of this hydrologic source to the wetland is likely to result in the resumption of a wetland hydrologic regime that is similar to one which was likely present prior to construction of the existing fill. In addition, it is likely that precipitation onto the proposed fill slope north of the wetland will continue to infiltrate into the existing and proposed porous fill material and will ultimately discharge into the wetland. Thus, it is likely that soils within the wetland will continue to remain saturated for sufficient duration during the growing season to meet the federal wetland delineation manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) technical criteria for wetland hydrology. Vegetation within Wetland A consists of mature shrubs and scattered trees that are well adapted to soil saturation and limited periods of inundation and are unlikely to be adversely impacted by changes to the current wetland hydrologic regime that might occur from the proposed grading plan. Therefore, it is unlikely that adverse impacts to wetland vegetation would occur. Wetland B and Its Unnamed Tributary Stream Wetland B and its unnamed tributary stream are approximately 193 feet and 100 feet east of the proposed project area work limits at their closest extent, respectively. Due to their distance from the proposed work, it is unlikely that existing sources of hydrology to the wetland or stream would be impacted by the proposed grading plan. In addition, native forest buffer would be retained around the wetland and its tributary stream to help maintain the existing hydrologic regime. Therefore, it is unlikely that adverse impacts to Wetland B or the unnamed stream would occur. Further, on page 16 of Raedeke's wetlands technical memorandum, Raedeke goes on to address as follows why it is unlikely that the proposed filling, excavation, and grading project would impact the West BRRF Wetland and the East BRRF Wetland: The west and east Black River Riparian Forest wetlands are approximately 160 feet south and 415 feet southeast of the -16- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron Pilling, Excavation, and Grading Project proposed project site (work area limits) at their closest extent, respectively. In addition, both wetlands are separated from the project site by the BNSF Railroad, which is an ongoing source of disturbance to the wetlands. Under Pointe Heron LLCs' proposed site grading plan, drainage from the MLDC Property (i.e., the Pointe Heron LLC parcel) and associated tributary areas will continue to drain into the existing railroad cross -culverts at the south edge of the property and be conveyed to the City park property, where the drainage will continue to flow into the BRRF wetlands. Due to (1) the distance of the BRRF wetlands from the proposed work, (2) the existing and ongoing disturbance from the BNSF Railroad, and (3) the filling, excavation, and grading proposal's planned maintenance of existing sources of hydrology to the BRRF wetlands, it is unlikely that the wetlands would be impacted by implementation of the proposed filling, excavation, and grading. Following the Raedeke wetlands technical memorandum's analysis of the proposed project's impacts to the BRRF wetlands, Raedeke notes that mitigation may include avoidance, minimization, and/or compensation' and, on pages 17 to 18 of the memorandum, then sets forth the following discussion of avoidance, minimization, and compensation in regard to the proposed project: Avoidance of Impacts The proposed grading plan has been designed to avoid direct impacts to Wetland A, Wetland B, the unnamed tributary stream to Wetland B, and their respective buffers. 1 On page 16 of Raedeke's wetlands memorandum, Raedeke explains as follows: Mitigation has been defined by the statewide SEPA Rules (WAC 197-11-768; cf. Cooper 1987) and, more recently, in a Memorandum of Agreement between the Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Memorandum 1989). In order of desirability, mitigation may include: 1. Avoidance -avoiding impacts by not taking action or parts of an action; 2. Minimization - minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation; 3. Compensation - which may involve: a) repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment; b) replacing or creating substitute resources or environments; c) mitigation banking. -17- Envirorunental Checklist Pointe Heron rilling, Excavation, and Grading Project Minimization of Impacts The proposed grading plan incorporates a number of design features that would avoid or minimize impacts to the wetlands and their buffers. These include the following measures: • Temporary erosion and sediment control (TESC) measures would be installed during construction and would utilize appropriate best management practices (BMPs) designed to prevent sediment from entering surface waters during and after construction; • Installation of a minimum five -horizontal -foot -thick buttress fill face to the proposed upward extension of the existing 1.51-1:1V slope from the south edge of the project site (work area limits) upslope of Wetland A and its buffer to (1) maintain hydrology to Wetland A (by transmitting subsurface seepage through the extension's porous buttress fill face) and (2) avoid erosion to the upward slope extension upslope of Wetland A and its buffer and consequent siltation of Wetland A; and • In order to reduce the potential for adverse water quality impacts to downstream wetlands, (1) the interim stormwater and water quality pond depicted on the project's Phase 1 grading plan sheets would be installed by October 1 of the first year's construction season of the proposed filling and grading in order to provide water quality treatment of stormwater runoff and (2) the potentially permanent stormwater and water quality pond depicted on the project's Phase 2 grading plan sheets (a pond that would replace the interim stormwater and water quality pond) would be installed not later than October 1 of the last year's construction season of the proposed filling, excavation, and grading in order to provide water quality treatment of stormwater runoff thereafter. Compensatory Mitigation Direct wetland, stream, and buffer impacts would be avoided under the proposed grading plan; therefore, creation, reestablishment, rehabilitation, or enhancement of wetlands is not needed and is not proposed. Following the Raedeke wetlands technical memorandum's discussion of avoidance, minimization, and compensation in regard to the proposed project, -18- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron tilling, Excavation, and Grading Project page 17 of the memorandum sets forth the following summary on the topic of the subject project's impacts to wetlands and streams: SUMMARY OF IMPACTS TO WETLANDS AND STREAMS The proposed fill, excavation, and grading project would avoid direct filling or grading within Wetlands A and B, the off-site BRRF wetlands, and the unnamed tributary stream to Wetland B. In addition, with adherence to the avoidance and minimization measures described above, we anticipate that indirect adverse impacts to wetland and stream vegetation communities or hydrologic regimes would not occur. In summary, the proposed fill, excavation, and grading project would not result in probable significant adverse impacts to wetland or streams within or in the vicinity of the project site. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes, the project will require work within 200 feet of Wetland A, Wetland 6, the unnamed stream, and the west BRRF wetland, but not within 200 feet of the East BRRF Wetland, a wetland that is 415 feet southeast of the proposed project site. See the attached two -sheet, reduced -size, color Wetlands and Stream Map, a map that shows (a) the portions of Wetland A, Wetland B, the unnamed stream, and the west BRRF wetland nearest to the project site, (b) the nearest distance between each of Wetland A (37 feet), Wetland B (193 feet), the unnamed stream (100 feet), and the West BRRF Wetland (160 feet) and the project site, and (c) the portion of the buffer(s) of each of Wetland A, Wetland B, the unnamed stream, and the West BRRF Wetland on the side nearest the project site. See also the attached Pointe Heron LLC Parcel with City of Renton Wetlands map, which depicts the West BRRF Wetland and the East BRRF Wetland. Also, note that Sheets E1, E2, E3, E5, and E6 of the project's Grading, Interim Drainage, E.S.C., and Rehabilitation Plans set forth depictions of some or all of Wetlands A and B and of the unnamed stream and each of their respective City of Renton buffers. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill and/or dredge material would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. -t9- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron riving, Excavation, and Grading Project No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. "No" to both questions. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. C. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The source of project runoff will be runoff from both (a) direct precipitation onto the project site and (b) other relatively small portions of the Pointe Heron LLC property that are tributary to the project site. In regard to the method of collection of the runoff, the proposed relatively flat area of the project site will be gently sloped to direct the runoff to the proposed stormwater detention and water quality pond to be constructed along much of the proposed flat area's northern edge. -20- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron riumg, Excavation, and Grading Project Both the proposed interim (Phase 1) and proposed (Phase 2) stormwater detention and water quality ponds are designed to discharge into on-site storm drain piping that will be constructed to connect into the existing Type II storm manhole constructed as part of prior Sunset Bluff project construction at the common boundary between the Pointe Heron LLC parcel and the BNSF railroad right-of-way. (The existing stormwater detention and water quality pond constructed as part of the Sunset Bluff project discharges into that same existing Type II storm manhole.) The flow from that storm manhole drains into the existing connected 18 -inch -diameter culvert that extends to the south across the BNSF railroad right-of-way and discharges into the City property south of the BNSF railroad right-of-way, where it drains into the wetlands in the Black River Riparian Forest that lie within that City property. No interruption, diversion, or change in drainage from the Pointe Heron LLC parcel is proposed. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No. See the response to section B.3.c.1, above. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: During construction of the proposed project, a Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead (CESCL) will conduct weekly inspections of the project site. In addition, BMPs such as silt fencing, interceptor trenches, temporary sediment ponds, straw waddles, check dams, straw mulching, and protective covers such plastic sheets along with other protective BMPs will be used to reduce and control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts. Both a proposed new interim (Phase 1) stormwater detention and water quality pond and the proposed new permanent (Phase 2) stormwater detention and water quality pond will be constructed. Unlike the existing pond, which was designed as part of the previously proposed Sunset Bluff development to meet the requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Manual, both of the proposed new ponds are designed to meet the requirements set forth in the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and 2009 City of Renton amendments to that manual. 4. PLANTS Check the types of vegetation found on therp oject site: -21- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project X deciduous tree: alder (saplings only), maple, aspen, other: willow (saplings only) _evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass _ _pasture _ _crop or grain orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops _ _wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other: _water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _other types of vegetation On page 6 of Raedeke's above -referenced 2014 Great Blue Heron & Wildlife Habitat Update Technical Memorandum, Raedeke explains that: The proposed fill and grade project site remains essentially unchanged since our previous habitat assessment (Raedeke Associates, Inc. 2009c). Nearly all of the project site is unvegetated due to past clearing and grading associated with the previously approved Sunset Bluff Residential Subdivision. Areas of forested vegetation remain in (1) a narrow strip in the north part of the BNSF railroad right-of-way (just north of the railroad tracks) along the south edge of the MLDC Property (now owned by Pointe Heron LLC and referred to in this environmental checklist as the Pointe Heron LLC parcel] and (2) the southeastern part of the MLDC Property. The BNSF Railroad right-of-way forms the southern border of much of the project site. The Black River Quarry site lies to the west of the project site and remains mostly unvegetated. The Black River Riparian Forest lies south of the railroad right-of-way and tracks. The forest in the eastern portion of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel (MLDC Property) consists of second -growth deciduous to mixed forest consisting of bigleaf maple, black cottonwood, Douglas fir, with common snowberry, red elderberry, hazelnut, and sword fern, and dense patches of Himalayan blackberry. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Nearly all of the 14.12 -acre project site is unvegetated due to (i) past clearing and grading associated with the previously approved Sunset Bluff Residential Subdivision and (ii) the previous (post -grading) placement of a minimum six-inch compacted depth of porous crushed aggregate (for Sunset Bluff project interim site rehabilitation and erosion control) over the areas of the current project site that are flatter than 15 percent. Some very small areas of sapling trees (all of which trees are less than 2 inches at breast height), grasses, and small shrubs exist within the project site and will be cleared as part of the proposed project. The above -noted areas of forested vegetation remaining within the -22- Enviromnental Checklist Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project southeastern part of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel (outside the project site area) will not be removed as part of the proposed filling, excavation, and grading project. Under the heading "Impacts to Other Wildlife Habitat," page 10 of Raedeke Associates, Inc.'s above -referenced 2014 Great Blue Heron & Wildlife Habitat Update Technical Memorandum explains: The currently proposed grading would occur almost entirely within the portions of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel (MLDC Property) that were previously cleared and graded. Those portions support little vegetation. A small patch of Himalayan blackberry with a few young alder and willow saplings (all of which are less than 2 inches dbh) located west-southwest of the existing stormwater pond would be removed as part of the proposed grading. No areas of well-developed forest on the Pointe Heron LLC parcel (MLDC Property), and no trees of 2 inches or more dbh, would be impacted by the proposed grading. Removal of the existing stormwater pond as part of the proposed grading and filling would cause temporal loss of a small area of habitat used by waterfowl for resting and feeding when water is present. However, we expect this to be replaced over time with construction of the proposed stormwater pond in the northern portion of the project site. Thus, we anticipate little or no impact to existing wildlife habitat or special habitat features on the project site. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. In view of Raedeke Associates, Inc: s above -referenced 2014 Great Blue Heron & Wildlife Habitat Update Technical Memorandum and the earlier reports that are attached to it as appendices, no threatened or endangered species of vegetation are known to be on or near the Pointe Heron LLC parcel. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None proposed as part of this project. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. None known. 5. ANIMALS a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: -23- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project Birds: hawk (see "other'), heron, eagle (see "other"), songbirds (see "other"), other: Cinnamon Teal, Mallard, American Widgeon, Gadwalls, Canada Geese, Hooded Merganser, Wood Ducks, Red Tailed Hawk, Pileated Woodpecker, Bald Eagle (but note that (i) the previous bald eagle nest that was about 1,100 feet south of the project site within the Black River Riparian Forest and that was reported in 2010 to have fallen out of the eagle nest tree at that location is no longer active and (ii) the previous bald eagle nest approximately 2,600 feet to the west of the project site near the northwest corner of the Black River Quarry also appears to be no longer active—see details, below), Great Blue Heron (but note that the Black River Riparian Forest's Great Blue Heron colony is no longer present—see details, below), Cooper's Hawk, Sharp Shinned Hawk, Band tailed Pigeon, Glaucous -winged Gull, Anna's Hummingbird, Red -breasted Sapsucker, Downy Woodpecker, Hairy Woodpecker, Northern Flicker, Violet -green Swallow, Steller's Jay, American Crow, Black -capped Chickadee, Chestnut -Backed Chickadee, Brown Creeper, Bewick's Wren, Golden -crowned Klinglet, Ruby - crowned Klinglet, American Robin, European Starling (1), Spotted Towhee, Fox Sparrow, Song Sparrow, Golden -crowned Sparrow, and House Sparrow (1) Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Eastern Cottontail Rabbit, Coyote, Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other Note that Raedeke's above -referenced 2014 Great Blue Heron & Wildlife Habitat Update Technical Memorandum addresses (i) the status of the Great Blue Heron colony in the Black River Riparian Forest, (ii) the status of a previously known bald eagle nest in the Black River Riparian Forest, and (iii) the status of the previously known bald eagle nest approximately 2,600 feet to the east of the project site. The Great Blue Heron is a State of Washington "priority species" (appearing on Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Priority Habitat and Species (PHS) database maps), not a threatened or endangered species. Further, according to page 9 of Raedeke's wildlife technical memorandum, the bald eagle is no longer a threatened or endangered species because it "[r]ecently ... [has] been down -listed to 'sensitive' at the State [level] and delisted at the federal level." In addition, on pages 4 to 5 of its wildlife technical memorandum, Raedeke sets forth the following under the general heading "REVIEW OF BACKGROUND INFORMATION": WDFW PHS Database The current Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW 2014) online Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) database map depicts an area just south of the project site as a "biodiversity and corridor" area. Formerly known as "urban natural open space" -24- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron . .... ng, Excavation, and Grading Projccl (UNOS), the area shown on the map is now confined to the Black River Riparian Forest south of the railroad right-of-way and tracks. In our previous review of the WDFW (2009) PHS database, we found that the UNOS designation had been mapped extending north of the railroad right-of-way and tracks onto the MLDC Property [i.e., the subject Pointe Heron LLC parcel], despite the fact that most of the MLDC Property had already been cleared and graded as part of the Sunset Bluff project prior to our 2008 and 2009 studies. The current PHS database map depicts a habitat polygon that generally corresponds to the area known as the Black River Riparian Forest (BRRF) and encompasses the historical sites of a bald eagle nest and great blue heron rookery, as well as the Black River, which contains salmonid fish. On the current map, the eagle nest and heron rookery sites are shown in the same approximate locations as they were shown on the previous WDFW (2009) PHS map. The bald eagle nest tree shown within the BRRF is one of two alternate nest trees of the Black River territory (WDFW No. 1610) and is approximately 1,100 feet south of the project site. The other bald eagle nest tree in this territory is located approximately 2,600 feet west of the current grade and fill project site near the northwest corner of the Black River Quarry. The WDFW (2014) PHS database contains records of nesting at one or the other of the two nest trees between 2005 and 2008, with young produced at the nest tree within the BRRF (1610-1) in 2007 and 2008 and young produced in the other (1610-2) in 2005 and 2006. In addition, the northwesterly nest tree (1610-2) was reported by neighbors to be active since 2000, and the nest in the BRRF is reported to have fallen out of the tree in 2010 (Chris Anderson, WDFW, personal communication, 2014; Gretchen Blatz, WDFW, personal communication, 2014). Great Blue Heron Colony History Great blue herons established a colony in the Black River Riparian Forest (BRRF) in 1985. We have monitored the colony since 1990 (see Table 2 in Raedeke Associates, Inc. 2009a). The colony increased from approximately eight nesting pairs in the mid- 1980s to a maximum of approximately 140 in 2006 (one year after grading of the Sunset Bluff residential subdivision project). Since then the colony has declined progressively, most likely due to chronic predation by a pair of nesting bald eagles that -25- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron , tlling, Excavation, and Grading Project established a nest within the trees formerly occupied by the nesting herons. WDFW no longer conducts annual monitoring of heron colonies and bald eagle nests (Chris Anderson, WDFW, personal communication 2013, 2014), and information that WDFW does provide is second-hand. The last known successful nesting period was in 2009, when an unknown number of fledglings were produced by 50 nesting pairs. Eagle predation greatly reduced the number of nesting pairs and fledglings (Herons Forever web site accessed August 31, 2009). A limited number of occupied heron nests were reported in the former nesting colony area in 2010 and 2011, but nesting success was not well documented and was likely very limited at best. WDFW (Chris Anderson, personal communication, 2013, 2014) confirmed that there are no reports of herons nesting in the former BRRF colony since 2011. According to WDFW, the herons that formerly nested in the BRRF could have established colonies elsewhere in the valley, but again WDFW does not conduct systematic annual monitoring of heron nesting colonies and does not know the actual fate of those herons (Chris Anderson, personal communication, 2013, 2014). Under the subheading "Current Status of the Heron Colony and Eagle Nest," Raedeke explains the following on pages 6 to 7 of that technical memorandum: Based on our observations at the BRRF during our 2013 and 2014 visits to the study area, it appears that the herons have abandoned the former colony site, with (1) nearly all of the historic heron nests no longer present, (2) no herons present, and (3) no evidence of heron nesting activity. The herons do not appear to have nested successfully for at least three years, and no nesting activity appears to have taken place since 2011. Thus, based on our observations and information available, the BRRF heron colony is no longer present. Also, we saw no evidence of activity at the bald eagle nest tree within the BRRF during our field investigations in 2013 and 2014. No eagles were observed on or over the study area or vicinity in 2013. During our April 2014 field investigation, we observed a sub -adult eagle soaring high over the project site and SR 900 to the north, but observed no adult eagles or evidence of nesting activity anywhere within the study area or vicinity. -26- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project Further, under the general heading "CURRENT HERON PROTECTION RECOMMENDATIONS," Raedeke explains the following on page 7 to the top of page 8 of that technical memorandum: The WDFW (Azerrad 2012) revised its Priority Habitat and Species (PHS) recommendations for great blue heron protection in 2012. WDFW's new recommendations categorize colonies (which are defined in the recommendations as Heron Management Areas — HMAs) as "rural," "suburban/rural," and "urban." These new recommendations provide separate buffer and protection guidelines for each such category. Although the BRRF heron colony is no longer present, if one assumed for the sake of argument that it still was present, the colony would fall into the "urban" category due to (1) the amount of development around the colony site, (2) the herons' historic habituation to human activity within a short distance to the colony site (e.g., the use of the public trail with colony viewing sites located within 200 feet of the colony site), (3) past blasting and mining activities in the adjacent rock quarry, and (4) the overall developed nature of the surrounding habitat within a commercial/industrial area of the City of Renton. The "urban" category would be consistent with the WDFW (2009) PHS database map's depiction of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel (MLDC Property) and the BRRF to the south as "urban natural open space." For active "urban" HMAs, the PHS recommendations are for a 60 - meter (197 -foot) year-round vegetated buffer and a seasonal (nesting/breeding) no -activity buffer of 200 meters (656 feet). Also assuming for the sake of argument that the BRRF heron colony was still present, even if the colony was to be categorized as an active "suburban/rural" colony (a category that does not appear to apply), the new PHS recommendations for a vegetated buffer would be 200 meters (656 feet). This larger area would still be contained entirely within the BRRF land controlled by the City of Renton and would not extend into any portion of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel (MLDC Property). In addition, under the general heading "Evaluation of Impacts of the Proposed Project," Raedeke explains the following from page 8 to the top of page 10 of that technical memorandum: Impacts to the Great Blue Heron Colony and BRRF Habitat -27- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron riding, Excavation. and Grading Project As noted above, the BRRF colony is not known to have produced fledglings since 2009, appears to have been abandoned, and is no longer present. Accordingly, there are no great blue herons nesting in the BRRF that could be impacted by the proposed grade and fill project. In addition, because the work area limits for the proposed grade and fill project are located entirely outside of the BRRF, we expect no impact to the forested habitat contained in the BRRF. Even if herons were present, the width of the existing forest habitat between the north side of the abandoned colony site and the proposed grading and filling project substantially exceeds the above -noted PHS -recommended Heron Management Areas, both for a vegetated year-round buffer (60 meters) and a seasonal (200 -meter) no activity zone. Based on previous habitat mapping, a 950 -foot (nearly 300 -meter) vegetated buffer exists around the north side of the abandoned colony site, as shown on the aerial photo Figure 1 from our February 2, 2009 Great Blue Heron Assessment report (Raedeke Associates, Inc. 2009a, which is attached as Appendix A to this document). Even if herons still occupied the former BRRF colony site, the 200 - meter no -activity zone for the nesting/breeding season would lie entirely within the BRRF (south of the existing BNSF railroad lines) and would not extend to the south edge of the proposed project site. Further, the WDFW PHS guidelines recognize that new activities in proximity to an HMA are a concern mainly when they exceed the type and intensity of historic activities in the area (Azerrad 2012). We note that the BRRF heron colony did not exhibit negative impacts associated with the clearing and grading of the Sunset Bluff project site in 2005. In fact, after the completion of that clearing and grading, the colony reached its maximum number of 140 nesting pairs in 2006. Hence, we conclude that the herons habituated to those changes in habitat conditions outside of the HMA. The colony declined in subsequent years when the bald eagles constructed a nest in the colony and predated on the nesting herons, rather than in response to changes in habitat outside of the HMA. It should also be noted that the current PHS guidelines have abandoned both (1) the previous PHS recommendation for a 1,000 -meter (3,300 -foot) no activity zone around the colony -28- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron � illing, Excavation, and Grading Project during the nesting season and (2) the previous PHS recommendation that no aircraft fly over the no -activity zone during the nesting season period. In regard to the former Black River heron colony, the old PHS recommendation of a 1,000 - meter (3,300 -foot) no -activity zone would have encompassed major portions of the commercial/industrial area of Renton, major transportation arterials (including 1-405), two active railroad lines, the long -existing heavy industrial operations on the quarry site, the Metro treatment plant, and residential areas. Impacts to Bald Eagles As noted above, a bald eagle nest was previously located within the BRRF approximately 1,100 feet south of the project site, and another nest tree (thought to be an alternative nest site within the same eagle territory) was located near the northwest corner of the quarry site, approximately 2,600 feet west of the project site. The bald eagle nest within the BRRF is reported to have fallen from the nest tree in 2010 (Chris Anderson, WDFW, personal communication 2013, 2014) and has not been rebuilt. State law provides protections for wildlife species listed as endangered (WAC 232-12-014), as well as threatened, sensitive, or "other protected" species (WAC 232-232-011). Recently, bald eagles have been down -listed to "sensitive" at the State and delisted at the federal level. However, in Washington, bald eagles are still protected by the Bald Eagle Protection Act of 1984 (RCW 77.12.655) and the Bald Eagle Protection Rules (WAC 232-12- 292). The Bald Eagle Protection rules have been recently amended such that state bald eagle management plans are no longer required unless bald eagles are listed as Threatened or Endangered in Washington State. WDFW is no longer asking local governments to require a state bald eagle management plan prior to issuing local permits. Although there is no longer a state bald eagle management plan requirement, landowners must still comply with the federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668-668c) to avoid impacting eagles. Generally, consultation with the local U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) office may be necessary to determine if a permit is required when proposing land use activities within 660 feet of an eagle nest. Here, no eagle nests appear to exist within 660 feet of the proposed project site or anywhere within the study area. -29- Em iromnental Checklist Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation, and Grading Project The USFWS (2007) National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines, which were established to minimize disturbance to eagle nests from activities such as construction or development, consider several factors, including proximity to the nest, the scope and nature of construction, the presence of screening vegetation (i.e., whether the activity is visible from the nest), and whether activities occur during the breeding season (generally between January and August). Depending on the type of land use activity proposed, the USFWS may recommend differing strategies based on whether the proposed activity will occur within 330 or 660 feet of a nest. The USFWS (2007) guidelines recognize, however, that eagles are unlikely to be disturbed by routine use of roads, homes, and other facilities where these uses predate the establishment of a nest site and successful nesting. Such is the case for both of the eagle nest trees in the vicinity, including the nest tree approximately 1,100 feet to the south within the BRRF (WDFW No. 1610-1), which is the nearest nest tree to the project site, as well as the nest tree approximately 2,600 feet west of the project site near the quarry (WDFW No. 1610-2); see Figure 1 of Raedeke Associates, Inc. 2009a, attached as Appendix A to this document. Eagles have successfully occupied the nest tree within the BRRF during previous years of clearing and grading, and have also successfully occupied the nest tree near the active quarry site. Given this context, the proposed grading activity is not likely to disturb either of the two known eagle nest sites, because they are well outside the setback zones in the USFWS (2007) guidelines. This would be the case even if the closest eagle nest tree, the one within the BRRF, was currently occupied, which it does not appear to be. Consequently, we anticipate no impacts to bald eagle habitat from the proposed grading activity within the Pointe Heron LLC parcel (MLDC Property). b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. In view of Raedeke Associates, Inc.'s above -referenced 2014 Great Blue Heron & Wildlife Habitat Update Technical Memorandum and the earlier reports that are attached to it as appendices, no threatened or endangered species of animals are known to be on or near the Pointe Heron LLC parcel. C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain Yes, the Pacific flyway. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 30- Enviromncntal Checklist Pointe Heron . ,ging, Excavation, and Grading Project The proposed work will stay entirely outside of the above- described WDFW PHS recommendations for Heron Management Areas for either (i) an "urban" -located heron colony or (ii) a "suburban/rural"-located heron colony. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The question is not applicable because the proposed project is for filling, excavation, and grading only. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. (The question presupposes post -construction use of the project site. However, the proposed project is only for construction of the proposed project. The ultimate post -grading use(s) of the project site, which are unknown at this time, will be the subject of one or more later land use proposals. (The construction equipment is the only element of the currently proposed project requiring energy.)) 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Police, fire, and general emergency services may be required during construction and will possibly continue to be required in conjunction with the ultimate future uses of the project site. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: 31- Environmental Checklist Pointe Hcron , ...ing, Excavation, and Grading Project A Construction Stormwater and Erosion Control Plan (CESCP) will be provided. Also, on-site spill response materials will be provided. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Currently, noise is generated from (a) the operation of construction vehicles and equipment in connection with the contractor's office, outdoor equipment and material storage, construction materials recycling activities, concrete batching, and industrial operations to the west on the Black River Quarry property, (b) an operating Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad line within railroad right- of-way that abuts and extends along much of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel's entire south boundary, (c) traffic noise from Interstate 405, SW Sunset Boulevard, and other area streets, and (d) noise from passing overhead aircraft and other off-site sources. However, the existing noise will not affect the proposed filling, excavation, and grading project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise from the proposed filling, excavation, and grading project (which will all be short-term noise) will come from both haul truck traffic and grading work as follows: (1) Hauling—this will involve haul trucks (a) bringing fill material (and other construction materials, such as pipe, catch basins, manholes, geotechnical fabric, etc.) into the project site through and from the abutting Black River Quarry property to the west via Monster Road SW, (b) depositing the fill and other materials into stockpile locations on the project site, and (c) then exiting from the project site into and/or through the Black River Quarry property and (2) Grading Work—this will involve the operation of earthwork equipment such as bulldozers, loaders, backhoes, rollers, and other heavy construction equipment for placing, grading, and compacting the fill materials, constructing the proposed slopes, installing storm drain pipe, catch basins, and storm manholes, excavating the proposed permanent stormwater detention and water quality pond, and surfacing the finished grade areas with crushed aggregate material as contemplated by the Grading Plans. -32- Enviroruncntat Clhecklist Pointe Heron, ,kine. Excavation, and Grading Project Hauling to and from the project site is proposed between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and between 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on Saturdays. Within 300 feet of residentially developed areas of residentially zoned property, Grading Work is proposed to be limited to between the hours of seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Hours of construction activities for the proposed project on the project site shall be limited to (a) the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday, and (b) the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. on Saturdays, with no such project construction activities permitted outside those hours or on Sundays except in emergencies. Highly visible signs will be posted on the project site stating "DO NOT SLAM TAILGATES." Nighttime -muffled backup alarms will be used on all dump trucks and other earth -moving equipment. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. There is not a current use on the Pointe Heron LLC parcel. The Pointe Heron LLC parcel lies between (1) SW Sunset Boulevard to the north (and existing single-family residential uses to the north of that boulevard) and (2) the BNSF Railroad right-of-way and freight train operations to the south (and City of Renton -owned property to the south of that right-of- way) and between (3) the forested westerly end of the existing Sunpointe Townhomes Condominium development property to the east- southeast and (4) the Black River Quarry parcels and the easterly (vacant) end of the Sunset View Apartments property to the west. The proposal is not expected to significantly affect the above -noted current land uses of the nearby or adjacent properties. Except for the Black River Quarry parcels (which will share its private entrance roadway off of Monster Road SW and its east -west internal access roads with the Pointe Heron LLC parcel), during the proposed filling, excavation, and grading project the access driveways/roads of all of the above -referenced -33- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron Filling, Excavation. and Grading Project existing residential uses will get access to their parcels from SW Sunset Boulevard. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or non -forest use? No, the project site has not been used as working farmlands or working forest lands. There are no agricultural or forest lands of long-term commercial significance on the project site. The project site is not resource lands. C. Describe any structures on the site. The site is currently vacant, with no structures on the project site (other than the MSE ecology block wall on the north, west, and east sides of the existing stormwater detention and water quality pond). d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. (However, the MSE ecology block wall on the north, west, and east sides of the existing stormwater detention and water quality pond is proposed to be buried in place during the proposed filling and grading.) e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The Pointe Heron LLC parcel's current zoning classification is Light Industrial (IL). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The Pointe Heron LLC parcel's current comprehensive plan land use map designation is Employment Area Valley (EAV). g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. Yes. Critical areas are discussed below. First, in regard to steep slopes, pages 15 to 16 of the Geotechnical Report state: -34- Enviromnental Chccklist Pointe Heron rating, Excavation, and Grading Project Steep Slopes Renton Municipal Code Section 4-3-OSOJla(ii) classifies steep slopes as either sensitive or protected. More particularly, RMC 4-11-190 defines steep slopes (and the protected slope and sensitive slope subclassifications) as follows: SLOPE, STEEP: A hillside, or portion thereof, which falls into one of two (2) classes of slope, sensitive or protected. A. Slope, Protected: A hillside, or portion thereof, with an average slope, as identified in the City of Renton Steep Slope Atlas or in a method approved by the City, of forty percent (40%) or greater grade and having a minimum vertical rise of fifteen feet (15'). B. Slope, Sensitive: A hillside, or portion thereof, characterized by: (1) an average slope, as identified in the City of Renton Steep Slope Atlas or in a method approved by the City, of twenty five percent (25%) to less than forty percent (40%); or (2) an average slope, as identified in the City of Renton Steep Slope Atlas or in a method approved by the City, of forty percent (40%) or greater with a vertical rise of less than fifteen feet (15'), abutting an average slope, as identified in the City of Renton Steep Slope Atlas or in a method approved by the City, of twenty five percent (25%) to forty percent (40%). This definition excludes engineered retaining walls. In regard to the location of steep slopes on a site, subsection i (Steep Slope Delineation Procedure) of RMC 4-3-050J1a (Steep Slopes) states: L Steep Slope Delineation Procedure: The boundaries of a regulated steep sensitive or protected slope are determined to be in the location identified on the City of Renton's Steep Slope Atlas. An applicant's qualified professional may substitute boundaries -35- Enviromnental Checklist Pointe Heron ing, Excavation, and Grading Project independently derived from survey data forth e City's consideration in determining the boundaries of sensitive or protected steep slopes. All topographic maps shall utilize two foot (2') contour intervals or the standard utilized in the City of Renton Steep Slope Atlas. (Boldfacing in the code text; underlining and italics added for emphasis.) The City of Renton has delineated areas of steep slopes (both sensitive and protected slopes) on the City's Steep Slope Hazard Atlas. Those delineated steep slope areas (along with areas of slopes that are greater than 15 percent and less than or equal to 25 percent) are depicted on the City's regulated slopes overlay that is part of the City's GIS system that is publicly accessible through the City of Renton website. Attached as APPENDIX E is a color map exhibit generated from the City's GIS system for the Pointe Heron LLC parcel with the regulated slopes overlay turned on. On that map both (1) the parcel boundaries have been outlined with a thick black line and (2) the project site (work area limits) for the proposed fill, excavation, and grading project have been outlined with a thick dashed line. The APPENDIX E map makes clear that no protected slopes lie within the project site (work area limits), although the map depicts four areas of protected slopes within the portion of the subject parcel to the east of the project site. Sheet E1 of the above -referenced set of Barghausen Grading Plans for the proposed project depicts those four areas of protected slopes and their approximate respective square footages: namely, from west to east, Protected Slope Area 1 (which encompasses approximately 5,299 square feet), Protected Slope Area 2 (which encompasses approximately 68,936 square feet), Protected Slope Area 3 (which encompasses approximately 2,241 square feet), and Protected Slope Area 4 (which encompasses approximately 1,532 square feet). Sheet E1 also depicts the minimum distance (110 feet) between the westerlymost protected slope area (Protected Slope Area 1) and the nearest eastern edge of the project site (work area limits). -36- Envirotnnental Checklist Pointe Heron _ _.ing, Excavation, and Grading Project APPENDIX E indicates 15% to 25% slopes across nearly all of the proposed project site and also indicates some small areas of sensitive steep slopes in the proposed project site, primarily in the western half of the project site. APPENDIX E depicts in white the remaining, scattered small portions of the project site, with the white portions intended to indicate areas of 15 percent or lesser slopes. Second, in regard to potential landslide hazard areas, pages 16 to 17 of the Geotechnical Report state: Potential Landslide Hazards RMC 4-3-05011b classifies landslide hazards as low, medium, high, and very high landslide hazards. The City's landslide hazards classification scheme is largely based on topography and stratigraphy. RMC 4-3-050J1b states: b. Landslide Hazards: L Low Landslide Hazard (LL): Areas with slopes less than fifteen percent (15%). ii. Medium Landslide Hazard (LM): Areas with slopes between fifteen percent (15%) and forty percent (40%) and underlain by soils that consist largely of sand, gravel or glacial till. iii. High Landslide Hazards (LH): Areas with slopes greater than forty percent (40%), and areas with slopes between fifteen percent (15%) and forty percent (40%) and underlain by soils consisting largely of silt and clay. iv. Very High Landslide Hazards (LV): Areas of known mappable landslide deposits. Based on our review of (1) RMC 4-3-050J1b(ii) (which classifies Medium Landslide Hazard Areas as "[a]reas with slopes between fifteen percent (15%) and forty percent (40%) and underlain by soils that consist largely of sand, gravel or glacial till," (2) the City of Renton's (APPENDIX E) map depiction of regulated slopes [a map that depicts (a) 15% to 25% slopes across nearly all of the proposed project site (work area limits), (b) only small areas of 37- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron ....ing, Excavation, and Grading Project sensitive slopes within the project site, and (c) no protected slopes within 100 feet of the project site], and (3) subsurface information provided in the above - referenced previous geotechnical reports and supporting documents concerning the subject parcel (geotechnical reports and supporting documents that indicate the project site is underlain by soils that consist largely of sand and gravel), nearly all of the project site is consistent with the Medium Landslide Hazard classification described in RMC 4-3-050J1b. However, because the constructed slope areas along the south and north edges of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel were created using permitted engineered fills, permitted cuts, and drainage provisions, from a functional perspective we would classify the existing slopes within or adjacent to the project site as low landslide hazard areas. Our conclusion is supported by the performance of both (1) the previously created south -edge engineered fill slopes to the east and west of the now -proposed fill and grade project site and (2) the previously created 2H:1V cut slope along a portion of the subject parcel's north edge, slopes that have remained stable since their construction seven to nine years ago. Given our understanding of the conditions present on the subject parcel and the design of the proposed filling, excavation, and grading, from a functional perspective it is our opinion that the entirety of the proposed project site (1) is currently a low landslide hazard area and (2) will continue to be a low landslide hazard area with the proposed filling, excavation, and grading construction. Note that RMC 4-3-050J1b(iv) defines the term Very High Landslide Hazards (LV) as "[a]reas of known mappable landslide deposits." An isolated area of the subject parcel, an area located approximately 500 feet to the southeast of the most easterly portion of the project site, contains a known Very High Landslide Hazard area. That area of the subject parcel, an area that is approximately 39,960 square feet in size, is labeled "VERY HIGH LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA (EX. SLIDE AREA)" and delineated on the overall site plan (Sheet E1) of the Barghausen Grading Plans along with an associated 50 -foot -wide buffer required by RMC 4-3-070J7b. (That existing slide area -38- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron it,, Excavation. and Grading Project straddles part of the easterlymost portion of the subject parcel's south boundary.) The existing slide area is totally separate from the proposed project site and has no bearing upon the proposed fill, excavation, and grade work contemplated by this report. Third, in regard to potential erosion hazard areas, pages 17 to 18 of the Geotechnical Report state: Erosion Hazards RMC 4-3-05011c classifies erosion hazards as either low or high depending on site slope gradient and NRCS soil classification scheme. RMC 4-3-050J1c states: c. Erosion Hazards: i. Low Erosion Hazard (EL): Areas with soils characterized by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (formerly U.S. Soil Conservation Service) as having slight or moderate erosion potential, and that slope less than fifteen percent (15%). ii. High Erosion Hazard (EH): Areas with soils characterized by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (formerly U.S. Soil Conservation Service) as having severe or very severe erosion potential, and that slope more steeply than fifteen percent (15%). The proposed project site is underlain predominantly by engineered fill. Those fill soils are characterized by the Natural Resource Conservation Service as having slight or moderate erosion potential. Further, nearly the entire project site has an extensive depth of crushed surfacing. Thus, even though some of the proposed project site has slopes greater than 15 percent, in our opinion the entirety of the proposed project site functions as a low erosion hazard. Note that erosion hazard classification is largely used to assess the sensitivity of a particular site with respect to off-site migration of soil and turbid surface waters. In this -39- Enviromnental Checklist Pointe Heron _- mg, Excavation, and Grading Project respect, the erosion hazards at this site can be successfully mitigated through erosion and sediment control measures that are addressed later in this report, measures that have previously been used at this site with good success. Fourth, in regard to potential seismic hazard areas, page 18 of the Geotechnical Report states: Seismic Hazards RMC 4-3-050.1d classifies seismic hazards as either low or high depending on underlying soils. RMC 4-3-050J1d states: d. Seismic Hazards: i. low Seismic Hazard (SL): Areas underlain by dense soils or bedrock. These soils generally have site coefficients of types S1 or S2, as defined in the International Building Code. ii. High Seismic Hazard (SH): Areas underlain by soft or loose, saturated soils. These soils generally have site coefficients of types S3 or S4, as defined in the International Building Code. (Ord. 5450, 3- 2-2009) The proposed project site is underlain predominantly by engineered fill placed over dense native soils and areas of bedrock. Accordingly, the project site would meet the classification definition for Low Seismic Hazard (SL). In our opinion, in view of the presence of stable soils and the lack of a persistent groundwater table, the project site would present (1) little to no hazard relating to liquefaction potential and (2) low hazard to ground rupture or lateral spread along sloped areas during a strong seismic event. Further, because of the presence of dense soil and areas of bedrock, the site does not have a high susceptibility to amplification of seismic wave energy. Although the project site is located in the vicinity of the Greater Seattle Fault complex, in our opinion the risk of -40- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heroi ling, Excavation, and Grading Project ground rupture or other seismic -related damage associated with the Greater Seattle Fault complex is only moderate. Fifth, in regard to potential coal mine hazard areas, pages 18 to 19 of the Geotechnical Report state: Coal Mine Hazards RMC 4-3-05011e classifies coal mine hazards as low, medium, or high. RMC 4-3-05011e states: e. Coal Mine Hazards: I. Low Coal Mine Hazards (CL): Areas with no known mine workings and no predicted subsidence. While no mines are known in these areas, undocumented mining is known to have occurred. ii. Medium Coal Mine Hazards (CM): Areas where mine workings are deeper than two hundred feet (200') for steeply dipping seams, or deeper than fifteen (15) times the thickness of the seam or workings for gently dipping seams. These areas may be affected by subsidence. iii. High Coal Mine Hazard (CH): Areas with abandoned and improperly sealed mine openings and areas underlain by mine workings shallower than two hundred feet (200) in depth for steeply dipping seams, or shallower than fifteen (15) times the thickness of the seam or workings for gently dipping seams. These areas may be affected by collapse or other subsidence. Based on our review of both (a) the City of Renton GIS map for the area surrounding the project site (see APPENDIX F-1) and (b) a King County Coal Mine map for the area in the vicinity of the project site (see APPENDIX F- 2), no coal mines are identified. Further, to our knowledge, no undocumented mining is known to have occurred beneath the proposed project site or within 300 -41- Emiromuental Checklist Pointe Herot ing, Excavation. and Grading Project feet of the proposed project site. Thus, based on the coal mine hazard code definitions quoted above, the proposed project site does not lie within or near any Coal Mine Hazard area. Sixth, in regard to potential volcanic hazard areas, page 19 of the Geotechnical Report states: Volcanic Hazards RMC 4-3-050J1f defines volcanic hazards. RMC 4-3- 050J If states: f. Volcanic Hazards: Volcanic hazard areas are those areas subject to a potential for inundation from post lahar sedimentation along the lower Green River as identified in Plate II, Map D, in the report U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey (Revised 1998), Volcano Hazards from Mount Rainier, Washington. Open -File Report 98-428. The subject parcel and the proposed project site lying within it are located outside mapped volcanic hazard areas delineated on the map resource cited in above - quoted RMC 4-3-050J1f. Thus, the project site is not located within a volcanic hazard area subjected to post- lahar inundation and/or sedimentation as defined in RMC 4-3-050.11f. Seventh, in regard to wetlands and an unnamed stream on portions of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel lying outside the project site, see section B.3.a.1, above, of this environmental checklist. (Note that no lakes lie within the Pointe Heron LLC parcel and no wetlands or streams lie within the project site portion of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel.) Eighth, in regard to the potential for habitat conservation areas on a portion of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel (a southeasterly portion of the parcel lying outside of the project site), see sections B.4 and B.S, above, of this environmental checklist. Note that due to Raedeke's documentation of the abandonment by the Great Blue Heron of the Black River Riparian Forest Great Blue Heron colony (see the excerpts from Raedeke's above -referenced 2014 Great Blue Heron & Wildlife Habitat Update Technical Memorandum, set forth in sections B.4 and B.S, above, of this environmental checklist), the forested southeasterly -42- Em iromnental Checklist Pointe Heron ing, Excavation, and Grading Protect portion of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel can no longer be viewed as a "habitat associated with the documented presence of non -salmonid .. . species proposed or listed by the Federal government or State of Washington as endangered, threatened, candidate, sensitive, monitor, or priority" for purposes of RMC 4-3-050K1a.i and thus cannot be considered a critical habitat on account of Great Blue Heron. Note also that due to Raedeke's documentation of the Wetland B as a Category 3 wetland rather than a Category 1 wetland (see excerpts from Raedeke's above -referenced Wetland & Stream Delineation Update 2014 Technical Memorandum set forth in section B.3.a.1, above), Wetland B is not a critical habitat by virtue of RMC 4-3-050K1a.ii. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? N/A j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? N/A k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: N/A M. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: N/A. (No nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance exist.) 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A -43- Enviromnental Checklist Pointe Heron ling, Excavation, and Grading Project 10. AESTHETICS What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? N/A b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? N/A C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The proposed project's design grades will limit aesthetic impacts. Particularly, the elevations of SW Sunset Boulevard (which are much higher than the proposed elevations on the project site) will significantly screen the proposed project from existing residences across SW Sunset Boulevard. Existing trees on the east and southeast portions of the Sunset View Apartments property to the west of the north portion of the site will significantly screen the proposed project from the nearest apartment building in the Sunset View Apartments property. The existing forested area in both (i) the southeastern part of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel and (ii) the northwestern portion of the Sunpointe Townhomes property to the southeast of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel will fully screen the developed areas of the Sunpointe Townhomes property from the proposed changes to the project site. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The only light or glare produced by this project proposal would come from the headlights of and work lights of the earthwork equipment, trucks, and other construction vehicles used on the project site. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: as - Em irotmtental Checklist Pointe Heron ng Excavation, and Grading Project None. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Off-site to the south of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel is the Black River Riparian Forest, which is a City of Renton -owned park area. Northeast of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel (across SW Sunset Boulevard), Earlington Park is located on Thomas Avenue SW. In addition, Skyway Park and Bryn Mahr Park, both King County parks, are located within 1 mile of the Pointe Heron LLC parcel. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. (Note that the proposed filling, excavation, and grading project will not cause any impacts on recreation.) 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe. No. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Is there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. "None known" is the answer to both questions. C. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. The project site has already been extensively graded as part of the Sunset Bluff residential development project. In conjunction with the prior grading of the -45- Emironntental Checklist Pointe Heron ing, Excavation, and Grading Project proposed project site as part of the Sunset Bluff project, neither were discovered (i) any buildings, structures, or sites located on or near the project site that were over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site nor (ii) any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation (including human burials or old cemeteries) or any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. None. (The lack of cultural and historic resources discovery during the prior site grading moots any reasonable need for additional measures now.) 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. For the proposed filling, excavation, and grading project, all trucks and equipment shall use the Black River Quarry entrance and exit off of Monster Road SW. That entrance and exit is a stabilized construction entrance and exit that includes an automatic washing facility for washing haul truck wheels to avoid tracking mud onto the adjacent public street. There is neither a specified route to access the entrance of the Black River Quarry, nor does there reasonably need to be one. Monster Road SW is not in a heavily developed residential area or in a dense business district (like in downtown Renton) where traffic congestion can be heavy. In view of the volume of fill needed for the project and the relative lack of traffic congestion getting to and from Monster Road, a specified route is not reasonably necessary. Trucks hauling fill material may be coming from multiple, as -of -yet unknown locations, making establishment of a haul route for the project site all the more unrealistic, especially at this point in time. However, because of likely use of freeways for hauling, haul trucks will likely access Monster Road SW via Oakesdale Avenue SW and SW Grady Way and/or via SR 900. Interstate 5 and Interstate 405 will be the main freeways serving haul trucks traveling to and from this project site. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? -46- Environmental Checklist Pointe Heron _ __ling, Excavation, and Grading Project There is a public transit stop located on SW Sunset Boulevard, about Y4- to %:- mile away from the project site. C. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non - project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? N/A d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). M e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Immediately to the south of the project site is a BSNF Railroad line. The rail line will not serve the subject project site. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and non - passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? The completed filling, excavation, and grading project will generate virtually no vehicular trips. (Future development proposal(s) for the Pointe Heron LLC parcel will involve vehicle trip forecasts by a transportation consulting firm of future development for review by the City.) The hauling of fill material into the project site is estimated to involve up to 350 inbound and 350 outbound haul truck trips on peak hauling days. Pointe Heron LLC is requesting from the Renton Development Services Division pursuant to RMC 4-4-030C2 (Haul Hours) (and/or pursuant to any other applicable portion of the Renton Municipal Code) approval of haul hours to and from the project site between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and between 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on Saturdays. g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: -47- Environmental Checklist Pointe Ilero., . illing, Excavation, and Grading Project None. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. N/A b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. No utilities are proposed or needed for the proposed project. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Proponent Signature: --Z Name of Signee (printed): Jimmy Blais Position and Agency/Organization: Environmental Affairs Manager, Pointe Heron LLC Date Submitted: h -48- EXHIBIT A S. 128TH ST. �o ti 9LF S. 132ND ST. 3 S S. 134TH � 3 Q � `l� �AlypSTp vii Q BLVD. o o� o a 4 RpAO = 3Rp o� =c' P S W. S SET A BLACK RIVER vG RIPARIAN FOREST (^ eNSF ova POINTE HERON LLC PARCEL VICINITY MAP N.T.S. EXHIBIT B t-� a �r cn v ry � � m EXHIBIT C eS/NOH3H 31NIOd dt/W AHJVHOOd01 -.p,x voeiour3 ..wn moa ..oz/Na:>wL-Aw e.o-a-xer,�,ymrll•oo>r,�.>cxr.xa:a, 00Z4I 'ON SOf '3O-8 9Zl6-Z9L (90Z) 004Z-VCL96 VM '3ZLLV3S zol 31U1S 'H.Lnos anN3AV LSI 09M OTl NOH3H 31NIOd N1N3vINCtlIN 'OW?.n5 "I 'N✓ld ONtlI '�NIN33Ni�N3 �WJ A*WCx3 y I � 5 �v \\\` , LL Lu rae v im r '1 „iroS 3rN3AN N?9.-p W �0'HO El LL - I CL IL 0 CL i� 3 NOLLVnNLLNOO HOH Z A3HS 3M .,.,........,..T.r,.�,.�.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,r�.� .,.�...,.,., ..,., . 0 (L I � 5 �v \\\` , LL Lu W CL El LL - I CL IL 0 CL i� 3 0 (L I � 5 �v \\\` , LL Lu W CL \ W :.a \� Lij/ i CL a LL IL O O cr W0 o 11, N CD 93, \ g \\\` , CL 11, N CD 93, CL ii t 1 1 1 \ " �S/NOHBH 31NIO l r 31vr. : sraN ddW AHdbliOOd01 NO.L\HH - - do All,) - I - .11 N11- "I , - , — 1, ... -'? V !— e.:,_,;.>:v , OOZIVIL 'ON 8Or'9*3'8 ,S/NO83H 3MIOd gz[ro-ZgL (90z) O(WZ-VCL86 vm,g-uvas (L zot nuns anNaV JLSI 09M cIVV4 kHcJVId!DO8Oi "I ,CN6 VM 'iND -11 NOL9H 3UNIW -NIz _S 3 '31,V 9 :TLLLL W=1 (L w0 A. '7toA uo /> "'y xv l I 777 LL A w -- < cr- 0 W w Y, A, a - AI CO 09 A 0 F- of X a si Aa� LL 0 J ek Jam, CC cl) T o (L J -W CL / Up� % NN W L Y w W CL 'j? A < F., T -v -jw(r CL < If F-5 < w (L -7; 3. LL . ........ .. .................... .6 ................ .1 - N(XLVrHiNW W03 I 193HS 998 S/NOJ-9H RLNKM 3- 1 aN� i�M -- ----- --- e.-- � - -- --- �.. --4--A-I -- ---- - ---------------- dVA AILM wisav EXHIBIT D .__ , , —11. >I -s m ce - 111W mN 00Z14 'ON 80f '•30'8 cS/NOH3H 3JNIOd 4 S N1N3WNOtlIAN NU3A4 '.......11 O Q SNV-1d NOIIV1J-I18VH38 (INV SZt6-Z9L (90Z) ;vmN a crm 'cNla33vl n3 w rn '� JI s 0017Z-VM86 VA4 '3-luvaS ° ! O'S'3 '30VNIVUa WINN3INI v� aer.e-az(s�r� rJNIOVJ -133HS N3A00 kfZOt 3llf1S `Hlf)OS 3f1N3AV 1St OSOS iN6 VPA (IN] 666 01-1N082H 3tNiOd =oso ' sIN] N Z� �� 7 �� Fures 3rn�nN sNzt :l S� �a IL d<66 ffiW [ p 14 � .. w 3 3 '9' W W R ] a k w yRJC� 0 z _ ,(I �`' ''� aOi / s s s b uj w ado R/1 M Q ��rFR LLLLJIII- �.&c P LLJ / S I Z-0 » 5' (O � Y� � ar r �3'L E 7 a W W x - �o rK F s O I'' _ ,j!�; lJ Q� .k �k �� J�1 W Po Q - w W ❑la��. O P.. K" m I wx I y � ty y cc W WLLL d EN I r I a W _ a w co : y Nag up J J 3 \ Q 1 3 gh i -- __j — r " `S/NOHaH 31NIOd 10 1— 3— A- JIS^3r ...:: SN did NOLLVLI18VH3d 0NV W " `0'8'9 '30VNJVUG M31M NOL�i32I ��_ � 9° -� - .-- - ' -- 'JNIOVMJ - 133HS 83A00 d0 ALL) �e '.vc 00Z -.t °-_ - ---- . Y Nm3�9NP.3 .:: e meso, r:ce�s�e-=wu/ oe�-oo�r.�uo�:w�r,.a,,x�san�cxa:taw' 007.41 'ON 80(''3'.78 ,S/NOH3H 3JNIOd 3:_ i NlN3wNCalry NU3 n5 1FNFN3°FV< y Q SZL6-Z9L (90Z) NNN> ary ^.N:tl33NJN3'.WJ , iii US3M) SNV-ld NOLLVIMVH3H ONV `0'83 0017Z-4EL86 VM '3-LLLV3S e ze e-sz(szr) ° '3OVNIVHO WIH3AI 'ONI4VHJ - 13SVHd i0l 31Jf)S ,RLnos anN3AV 121 OSOS zzzs-.sz(szot Z u� v Olt NOH3H 3J.NIOd oar rn 'iH3r m os 7r 3r,y eNzz s:zai y+a �4 W W U rc €y wr 0 g xP ` €ca ina w Q CL IL 1131 S 5 ,y G - L;Z Q 6_ r a aN xW w Yg NOLLvnNOO WJ £333HS 38 W X -L I�....u.}�o�u����ua�uu��uu��*�r■ Zl6a4 it t ti 4 s $ $ cr co IL w in a Z \ - 3 —a I i �wsor6a_ 1- ' ,y, 1 %�� ♦�� LLl \. �ti. %� 7wCD � Z CE \�\v r- m� Z I A. l{ CI Z1p K v v a oj ,N� 88 r r � A r cS/NOH3H MNIOd —�" US3M) SNV7d NOLLV_UllaVH3H OJV "O'S'3 „ » -aa . wriva F 3`JVrN MO Y4Ni3 M 'DNIOVJfJ - L 3SVHd 4AI ��__ �0 I,11 LIJ --- ..,, —11"v .,,,,s m:,u, --66Z 'ON 80f`'3'OS aS/N(DH3H 3JNIOd a rte3rvrvealw 'aeu ns �woxaoy t Qi SZl6-Z9L (90Z) a— 11.111.11 I'll .0 OO4Z-4£186 VM'31LLV3S eae aece-,sr(szo)q ! �I (. SV3) SNVId NOLLV1JIIGVH3d CINV `O'S3 ZOt 3wnS 'H1nOS 3nN3AV iSl 09M sae-' gZ(wo) Z m K o W '30VNIVHO NIH3INI `JNIOV6'0 - l 3SVHd O'll NOH@H 3JNIOdMIN- Im 'iN1 A d 31111 Iw'cs 3nN31r �Nz� d5 r , � \ CL Z QF- Ld / Z S cfj X / a t --A7 s cr 4-1 W Alz ZI"'+j �/ I,•� IN 8 s -A`-___ 3 LF '�`.�' j,"gm6WB < :3n Val, 0 cr AP, LL I Q 7' d vT '51-R 1 dW iiruuii.r.r.ru.ruu�rir�ra i� '1 �l�.�r�.�if �i{Y4YW�tithSlrr�/i'i�1 ir�rar�rlr�.� d. NoLLVnNLLNoo uod Z3133HS 33S aS/NOH3H 31NI0d d .�- aaa« Siva .a oisi,aa oa (1SV=l) SNVId NMVL118VHBIA 4NV "O'S3-- 3OVNIVt1O IM1i3JNI 'JNI vm - l 3SVHd NOLN�2I-- ---- � ' 1-111x, � _ .-w , .a az 'ON SOf SO'S .S/NO83H MNIOd I I aY � SZt6-Z9L (90Z) ly I w5 T1N3nNCtlIM 'UNU3 1S yry9M3pyE1 NI b SSI, i ear. 0017Z-Kt86 VM '3111V38 xee zeta-sz(szo; id l 8s I �' o� w zB 65 E6 �R ZOt 3Am'Hinos anN3AV 1St 09M 7 e ezt9-.Ss(ser) as ,,, N N Z ^ �S I g 6 SNOLL038 SSOHO - 13SVHd GSu Ol l NMSH 31NIOd arcs 3rN3nv aNe[ s,._el �d Boo. s.ai 3ti11 r o0i. yy v5 0 p � d W J I zi $� o cc � �Lt Q x 3 `^ v, Wl OI CO USWLL E, x 0QZ�3G - y t65 o w (a T 4 Q Cl) CL Y Q WIF UJ I h h QY N F p S $ o � cS/NOH3H 31NIOd SNOLLo3S SS080 - 13SVHd a NOINHH 11 30 x1IJ v ��,'•, 3zva Noise 'cv �; I I aY � r ly I itl > SSI, i ear. id l 8s I Q O zB 65 E6 �R EE f5 J 7 e EB �E3 r I ec s.r GSu sa I id Boo. s.ai rC�I r o0i. I I aY � r ly I 1 U > ear. / F L I �R �r z�E� J 7 e r Gii ec s.r I aY � r ear. / F L I J 7 e s s.r -- , . TaWsl , ., " it, w." —OOZ4t 'ON SOf '30E cS/NO83H 31NI0d sa- m 3rvu Iva ouUaas+ ; „w�N3pMir Q 9m_Z9L (9OZ) NrvCd GN41 4tl3i41JN3 t (1S3M) SNVId NOLLV11lFJ (INV "0'93OObZ-KIS6 VM '9-LUV3S '30VNIVHO V%Ug M 'JNIGVUO - Z 3SVHd ZOt 311f1S 'H nOS 3nN3AV 1St OSOS Olt NOd3H 31NIOd 8A an. 'IN' .N � d 3tilLFJOd o e ar nx cNzc a.ral SgbNO� 0 28. ILu a SIL w i at2 Q 2, J r JLLcy w y m M �g RE Q 5 i der ro5 W NOLLVnNLLNO0 UCJ 99 J33HS 335 i �iu..r■uu��u����'�r�i*�r��. w i1h1�J,rf`%Ii11�AR��' uj t JIW", R a a OQ Zt�\� " It %Sw I i Vj W ` t 4 12 L � N \ f \ � /AJJ �� �� t t z�y '�•.. V `ty V t Z l CL �I J /� vX C cS/N066H 31NIOd m e a ols a s�,o>ti o,la�n � =�nw=G rvniaa� (1S3M) SNO'Id NOLLVL-MVH3N dNb' `O'S'3- �= '30VNIVW MaLM V4CWUD - Z 3SVHd 30 ID — — - cS/NOHRH 31NIOd (1SV3) SNV-1d NOLLV1n1SVH3U OW "O'SA '3JVNIV8a W1U31NI `JNKMM - Z 3SVHd W rev Sll6—ZDL (90Z) W D DV 11 IN1 M1N3nNOdIM NU iK '�NINNtlId ONtlI '�NIi133NgN3 INIJ 0092-9£186 VM'3"LUV38 esu aece-.sc(szr; Z01311ns 'HJIIOS 3f1N3AV 1S10SOS ass-sz(szo; Olt NOH3H 31NIOd "1A 1N Hir';s 3rN3ns cNzt „ze1 007,91 "ON SOf SO'8 it ~, f{ f � ✓ Y�wIcYl�lrlui cS/NOH3H 31NIOd USV3) SNV-1d NOLLV.LnIGVH3H ONV '3<JVNVW MUM NI 'JNOVED - Z 3SVHd rt I. 1 I r I � 01 11 �g 1 11 1 I�I�I�IY f�1iI �f�I�1iI l iYiiYl �IIffYWI'WYI�1 Nmvrt4L r,,w klOd 931�iS �S OS3 NOINHH ��,J �� Jo All, / C ` rt I. 1 I / w f Y���3s�a W� sn Z i L s A a 9 .. LL I � i Y --- I "', I - �, s I . -, , �, � --Odz—fl 'ON GWSO'S ,S/N0H3H =-UNIW IIIA 7- U 9ZL6-Z9L (90z) 0017Z -M96 VM'3-UV38 'HInOS Gy tia 56: zot 3Iins 3nN3AV 1Z 09M 'C6 lVi1 SNOLL03S SSOIAO - Z BSVHd 011 N083H 3JNIOdHi� :LK):i W" Cl 31'N3AV fnv uj Is w L ru a o olu 7 5 E 8l IIIA 7- U 7�z Gy tia 56: lVi1 fnv I --T--- 7- 7�z I I O .S/NOLSH aiNfQJ MV . SNOLL03S SSOHO - Z 38VHA NOINSH 30 AILIJ w Oph L 1- , 11 91 "a/L , --oMj-4 -ON EWSO'G ---- — A11— —," wzm -ON aor so -e ,S/NOH3H 3INK)d SZL6-Z9L (90Z) 0002-VeLse Vm,=J-Luvas xj zot gms,Hinm 2nN3AV iSI 09M S -11V130 GNV S31ON 011 NCk9H MNKM 3,-N3 -Ni[ -- I '3111 H03 ruroS i ��lva Iw 85 v LL Ir L W Yi 91 P x, -'Rug t of V4 _j x p! -N 9 IE9, AINP-11, �Y LU 45L, s ? U V W 'n'i X � 0 Am ! ': t " 4 —M, 9 ?4 T g S/NO89H 3IN10.1 =Z7 . . .... .... SIV130 GNV SRiON NOINSH Aill') Ztq ON GOr '9'0'8 ,S/N(DUBH 31NIOd GZL6-79z (907)GNY1 001?Z-4CL86 1vm'3_uvDs ZOL auras RLnos DnN2AV 1St 0905 S-11VJ 30 ONV S=_LLON _1VO1NH33L1O-M OT1 N083H aWlOdHif Cs I N3A� -- 'N7,' re 7Q I , 11111;'311 419 II ut - 1I CO CO LIS Ir [' 1� I " W 2 4 1 Mg § 82 r HUHN 'H --g qjj�'.; Eli 9 'NIM I gi PIT Ea°gj :9 11,1161 if] E jfj f3 jiv E rp P,88 iG 2�-Jb;!flfs M m " gl E E. U J g 9 If ED 8 9 1"M z if - z s D li t � 3.1'j U 1211 -a 1h D g 9 SE 91 ,S/NOSH 3iNK).1 o. SM SIV SBION OINHO3LO30 NoiNHH 30 AID EXHIBIT E EXHIBIT F 3vw wy3als aNv `'aNvi13M CS/NON3.1 alMW dbW ,kHd` UDOd01 --6w ON eor 30 SZ16-ZOL (90Z) ,3-1Uvm t OOVz-Klm VM t CL v zot aim 'Punm am2kV IS 09M W41 ill NOH3H 31N10d 0, a� nVMO O 80=1 z �+ NOLLYnNUNOO W=1 z A3HS 33S if LL yj it Z 111 xt W a _! -z's. CL O H r 0- _- EL U- 0 3 91, CL CL r I , ,SINOU3H 31NOd d`dW 1+H8t16VOd01 `0 LNAM �■� �jr AO 0 0 ibW WV3H1,S ®NH SQNVI13M 'ON8Or7TOE cS/NOH3H 31NIOd v3 WIN3NNo", Awow.ew, a 97.16-Z9L (90Z) '�rvaaaa oNri'�rva3v.vi�na �Ur. !ZAP- OOvl-M86 VM '3 LUV3S d ddA kHclVHOOdOl m 311ns 'Hi-nOs 3nN3AV IS 09os eie--.sr(scr, fi R s ZZZ9-'.57,(NO) �� Q 4 O-1� NOH3H 3 NlOd ZfOB6 dM '1N3N d 9 1 31111 HOS ores 3rNYV aNu "pi a (L ! o � EL cl:��, / / / x r / w F O \b 0 W_ o ul W z Z ¢ � FD CL IL W 0 o U 00 d F- LL "' w O w F- OL- \ 3 � .-i l� it l/ l i �go_3s 3 / / / f co Q-_�-----------y�/��<s �fli I wCE 1 l m i f a- >- >- f1 .h _ J m I 1 P n / Q 00 0; a3c�J` ilk; I i / ; Irl l I s l i y,.NNg e ¢ - f` cc IL .......r� IL �'.u..........�.u�� i�ilruuuu� ...... NOLLvnNIlNOO HOS 1133HS 335 ONOH3H 31NIOd °° adw 3idc Nas A dVV4 ,,HdVbJOdOi NO.LNSH _ r ____.. __ — - 30 All") 9 0 EXHIBIT G 0 o o_ Z> tu 1, r? SB19£' 3 N 0 F z. w 0 H- s i LL o d w oo Z w mho K w �o° moo: Iz =m'6n _ og In mzP =w ~ ao Q�♦♦♦ 'o v ! 3 s� I � I I or .r�r S. ®�® Ld lava s aoMva � 3 W Z asra • aeirva *r r`; r Q. ..U2• w F.' '�y o f CK Z mb ' - Z= CO) NLU c ca 3 z � o cl) �o LL Z Z02 li NZ LL.a °I y 0 oz 4i04 0 1 Z e � dr W W �., A§ lto a r © �zi r U. O Z�~1 z 'lam 11 O 1/ o yl m V ©' 3 of ez l0 O. o_ Z> tu 1, r? SB19£' 3 N H ¢ x z. w 0 H- s i LL o d w oo Z w mho K w �o° moo: Iz =m'6n _ og In mzP =w ~ Q�♦♦♦ 'o v ! 3 a]3yl n3i Q J � W 0 i 0;\ ray P z LU Q o_ Z> tu 1, r? ` Ra O W N'. W 2 (n O) y Y ol m O I I I ZO VI o vo o C ~ N / o � z o /1 / 3 ~ C7 I Z � c ag ♦�' . Q J 1 3 I W I LDM I W W ^ z o � a � B W CD Y � o z � LLJCD O Ln r Q 3 tn. LL C.D a/ ww 01 O iye 0d sJ 00 U w o W_ O ®1 Ln Z LLJQ 21 F � Z O LL O o: `z W � m B1 0. Q <f L) O V O I I I ZO VI o vo v CD 0 I in o ca N. v U L'3 O N Y o o C ~ N / o � a �E l� c ag ♦�' . y v CD 0 I in o ca N. v U L'3 O N Y o C ~ r ti y � a �E �w c ag ♦�' . oiaq ` v CD 0 I in o ca N. v U L'3 O N Y o C ~ r 4w �o 7 N � a NNW� � �w c ag ♦�' oiaq ` .99"LL9C 3 .9£ A .10 N 4w �o NNW� � �w sca�9 • r/ ♦�' Mi 0 ezoN waov `I. �iy w 6 3 w z �i o � rcV 14Y3 9 aDNYtl �`� s Q W, - I 3^rCP _ r4)o = C R '..3 P 4 4 1 ti ^W 0 ezoN waov `I. �iy w 6 3 w z �i o � rcV 14Y3 9 aDNYtl �`� s Q W, - I O P I W " k 14N,i Ol.?N 111 J 3 ~ C7 roo jg V U)o r 4 c M a 0 Z O 3 ~ C7 "Pe jg V U)o 3 LL1 c 46o O N i m t W cl, � 3 Ur Q N U „ m U3 zM1�Inlo I •00 LL 1r` �0y O LLjO O cr, g •oy ai m ",f (o j. may. 2 o: z "Pe Z Q rm C),LL e e O m U3 zM1�Inlo I •00 LL 1r` �0y O LLjO O cr, g •oy ai m ",f (o j. may. 2 o: z "Pe Z Q rm C),LL e e O cl:CL i m t o Ur II •p� `'P ,i En E m -in Y s � r I U � s ja L5 C W � LL O LL _ '0e a aQ� OPV W U Z LU O Q a P cn O LLJ Liui o: z "Pe Z Q rm C),LL e e O cl:CL i m t o II > a1 •Oa LLJ cn LD LL LLjCD 3: cn U LL 0 m C:) Z LL -"Z 0 as L w) z LL LLjCD 0 cn U LL 0 C:) Z LL -"Z as L w) z W 0 cc ::. D -- F— N w LU 0 ul ci 0 ul ci Z LU ..... 0 Ll - 0 z LU z cr Cr IL cE t C) CD Ld CD I LD A" A 3 j 3 t". 3 L a }\ j }�`�:\/� \ \ \\ 3 1 Q C) 0 I F z LLI N ui o � a d w zz J H M O N J F U cj J � J (/J O N W r O a) M co co T - _ � ro a Z cW C fn W Q Q W Z J Z F- M O N J � U � J r J U1 O N 0 SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE Guarantee No.: G-6329-000003348 Fee: $350.00 Order No.: 01148-34930 Dated: August 11, 2014 Issued by STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY Stewart Title Guaranty Company (the "Company"), guarantees the County of King and any City within which said subdivision is located in a sum not exceeding $1,000.00 that, according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matters affecting the title to the land included within the exterior boundary shown on the map of the subdivision, the only parties having any record title interest in said land whose signatures are necessary, on the certificates consenting to the recordation of said map and offering for dedication any streets, roads, avenues and other easements offered for dedication by said map as referred to in the guarantee. Signed under seal for the Company, but this Guarantee is to be valid only when it bears an authorized countersignature. Countersigned by: stewaom — ^ /�`—ill title guaranty company A , lA�, Matt Morris Aulhonzed CountersignaturePresident and CEO Stewart Title Company` 18000 International Blvd, Suite 500 rex�s. SeaTac, WA 98188 Denise C rraux Agent ID 470047 Secretary Guarantee Serial No. G-6329-000003348 In writing this company please address it at P.O. Box 2029, Houston, Texas 77252, and refer to the printed Serial Number. RECEIVE® JAN 2 3 i0' CITY OF RE^'iON ,An,'ed. oviso'v WA Subdivision Guarantee SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE Order Number: 01148-34930 Effective Date: August 11, 2014 at 8:00 am Prepared by: Stewart Title Company 18000 International Blvd, Suite 500 SeaTac, WA 98188 Guarantee No.: G-6329-000003348 Premium: $350.00 Sales Tax: $33.25 Total: $383.25 OWNERS: Pointe Heron LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO SUBJECT TO: General taxes: First half delinquent May 1, Second half delinquent November 1: Year: 2014 Amount Billed: $65,204.04 Amount Paid: $32,602.02 Amount Due: $32,602.02, plus interest and penalty if delinquent Tax Account No.: 132304-9010-03 Levy Code: 2104 Land: $4,574,800.00 Improvements: $-0- Note: King County Treasurer, 500 4th Avenue, 6th Floor Admin. Bldg., Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 296-7300 Web Address: http://webapp.metrokc.gov/kctaxinfo/. 2. Liability for sewer treatment capacity charges that may be assessed but not disclosed in the public records. Please contact the King County Capacity Charge Department for further information at 206-296-1450. Deed of Trust and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantor: Merlino Land Development Co., Inc., a Washington corporation Trustee: Stewart Title Guaranty Company, a corporation Beneficiary: SR 900 L. L. C., a Washington limited liability company Amount: $6,800,000.00 Dated: September 20, 2005 Recorded: September 20, 2005 Recording No.: 20050930003847 (Affects: Subject parcel and other property) Note: We find no release of record for said instrument. 4. Unrecorded leaseholds and rights of tenants, if any. Page 1 of4 STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY WA Subdivision Guarantee 5. Terms and conditions of Survey recorded December 12, 1990 under Recording Number 9012129007. (Affects: Subject parcel and other property) 6. Terms, covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements, if any, as contained in recorded Lot Line Adjustment (Boundary Line Revision): Recorded: March 11, 2004 Recording No.(s): 20040311900015 Page 2 of 4 STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY WA Subdivision Guarantee SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE Order Number: 01148-34930 Guarantee No.: G-6329-000003348 This Guarantee and the legal description given herein are based upon information supplied by the applicant as to the location and identification of the premises in question, and no liability is assumed for any discrepancies resulting therefrom. This report does not represent either a commitment to insure title, an examination of or opinion as to the sufficiency or effect of the matters shown, or opinion as to the marketability of title to the land. Page 3 of 4 STEW ART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY WA Subdivision Guarantee EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 1 of the SR 900 L.L.C. Lot Line Adjustment (City of Renton File No. LUA-03-124-LLA) as recorded in Volume 168 of Surveys, pages 233 through 235, under Recording No. 20040311900015; records of King County, Washington. Page 4 of 4 STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY �stewart MP" ORDER N0: 01148-34930 This sketch is provided without charge for information. It is not intended to show all matters related to the property, including, but not limited to area, dimensions, encroachments, locations or boundaries. It is not a part of, nor does it modify the commitment or policy to which it is attached. The Company assumes NO liability for any matter related to this sketch. Reference should be made to an accurate survey for further information. V0 /+P ,stewart = r title ORDER NO: 01148-34930 This sketch is provided without charge for information. It is not intended to show all matters related to the property, including, but not limited to area, dimensions, encroachments, locations or boundaries. It is not a part of, nor does it modify the cormnitment or policy to which it is attached. The Company assumes NO liability for any matter related to this sketch. Reference should be made to an accurate survey for further infonnation. M 4-i) .z -5vv I �J-«-u4 «Y RECEIPT EG00037345 citof LUA15-000039 BILLING CONTACT JIMMY BLAIS POINTE HERON LLC 9125 10th Ave S Seattle, WA 98108 Transaction Date: April 27, 2015 POINTE HERON LLC CITY OF RENTON DATE INVOICE NO DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION PAYMENT BALANCE REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME TYPE METHOD AMOUNT PAID LUA15-000039 PLAN - Variance Fee Payment Check #3151 $1,200.00 - 000.000000.007.345.81.16.00D $1,200.00 .00 Technology Fee Fee Payment Check #3151 $36.00 503.000000.004.322.10.00.000 $36.00 SUBTOTAL $1,236.00 TOTAL $1,236.00 POINTE HERON LLC CITY OF RENTON DATE INVOICE NO DESCRIPTION INVOICEAMOUNT DEDUCTION BALANCE 4/21/15 04 21 15 PT HERON & FILL 1236.00 .00 1236.00 tGRADE CHECDATEK 4/22/15 3151 OHECK TOTAL> 1236.00 1236.00 NUMBER .00 PLEASE DETACH AND RETAIN FOR YOUR RECORDS Pnnted On: April 27, 2015 Prepared By: Clark Close Page 1 of 1 POINTEMERONLLC CITY OF RENTON DATE INVOICE NO DESCRIPTION INVOICEAMOUNT DEDUCTION BALANCE 4/21/15 04 21 15 PT HERON GRADE & FILL 1236.00 .00 1236.00 K 4/22/15 3151 TOTAL, 1236.00 .00 1236.00 DATE NUMBER I RECEIPT EG00033158 BILLING CONTACT JIMMY BLAIS POINTE HERON LLC 9125 10TH AVE S SEATTLE, WA 98108 ,--"City of ' i M x Transaction Date: January 23, 2015 LUA15-000039 SUB TOTAL $3,759.50 TOTAL $3,759.50 RECEIVED JAN 2 3 2015 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DINSION Printed On: 1/2312015 Prepared By: Clark Close Page 1 of 1 TRANSACTION PAYMENT REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME TYPE METHOD AMOUNT PAID LUA16-000039 PLAN - Environmental Review Fee Payment heck #3126 $1,000.00 PLAN - Grade and Fill Permit Fee Payment heck #3126 $2,500.00 PLAN -Modification Fee Payment heck #3126 $150.00 Technology Fee Fee Payment heck #3126 $109.50 SUB TOTAL $3,759.50 TOTAL $3,759.50 RECEIVED JAN 2 3 2015 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DINSION Printed On: 1/2312015 Prepared By: Clark Close Page 1 of 1 fPOIN;'E HERON LLC 3126 --twice Date Imoice Number GIL Account n Uon Invoice Amount Check Total 375 j (/