Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWWEE - Reach Plus c'( ... Rating Tool for 2009/2010 Funding Applications SECTION 1. Mary Ann: Pass/Fail: If all answers are yes, the application goes forward. If any answer no, the application review stops. Yes No TMfir 2-Submitted before deadline? M ❑ A I-questions answered on City supplemental appl'catio ? ❑ Common Application Checklist-all items "yes"? ( n a_1 s o 0 g. , COMMON APPLICATION CHECKLIST YeszNd Cover pages , Agency Information and Questions 1-7. O ❑ Question 8 Organizational Experience (2 page maximum) [ ■ Question 9 Need for Your Program (2 page maximum) � Question 10 Proposed Program/Service (6 page maximum),, LJ E-Question 11 Long Range Plan (1 page maximum) Question 12 Budget (2 page maximum) Data Tables Question 13 Number of Individuals/Households Served U Question 14a-c Performance Measures and Average Cost of Service ( ❑ Question 15 Demographics (front all funding sources) Eg ❑ Question 16 Program Staff ' . ,R 1 Question 17 Program Revenue&,Expense Budgets 1�1 ❑ Question 18 Subcontracts �,�! Required.Documents L� Ll Proof of non-profit status .Organizational Chart G ❑;Agency%Organization Mission Statement: ( ❑ Board resolution;:authorizing submittal of the application (may be submitted up to 60 days after application). ❑ List of the current governing board and local board, if applicable, (include name, position/title, City residence, length of time on the Board, and expiration of terms. Note any vacancies:);, ❑ Board Meeting Minute's of last three board meetings of governing board and local board as applicable' Annual Budget ❑ Financial Audit Cover Letter ❑ financial Audit Management LetterlY\?6,---- er70 Financial Statement Kil � Verification of Non-Discrimination Policy 1- . LII Program Intake Form ❑ Rrgliding.Fee Scale n `,� PASS i FAIL ating T-.l p. 1 D =- . 4/15/08 H:\HS 08\09-10 Funding cycle\Rating TooI414financeupdate.doc SECTION 2. Karen & Dianne: All pre-applications Passed No Score Rating Tool p. 2 Draft of 4/15/08 H:\HS 08\09-10 Funding cycle\Rating TooI414financeupdate.doc Human Services Advisory Committee: Scores quality of the application 0-3 a. Organizational Experience (score 0-3) Agency has track record of providing service (score 0-3) Staff has applicable/related experience in working with proposed program and/or training (score 0-3) Was there an explanation as to how the Board stays informed and connected about needs in South King County? b. Is the need in the City supported:by data? (score 0 —3) Is the data specific to Renton or to'South King County? (score 0 — 3) Is there a quantifiable need? c. How easily can Renton residents access the program? (score 0-3) Does the,proposed outreach fit Renton or show knowledge of Renton?.,;., . '' . (score 0-3) Were the language and cultural needs of the clients addressed'? (score 0-3) Does the agency propose to have subcontractors or partners? Are services accessible through 1) the organization or 2) the subcontractors/partners? (Circle one) d.. Long Range Plan (score,Q=-3) Is a Tong-range plan described, versus a strategic plan? (score 0-3) Does the plan list multiple funding sources for future `..funding? -(score 0-3) Was evaluation of services mentioned in the plan'? SCORE: / 33 Total Score: / 52 Rating Tool p. 6 Draft of 4/15/08 H:\HS 08\09-10 Funding cycle\Rating TooI414financeupdate.doc SECTION 5. Finance Subcommittee of Human Services Advisory Committee: Scores financial health of the agency Originally the thought was that this would be pass/not pass. However, it does not get to the financial health of the organization. 1. Level of Financial Statements without "going concern" noted in Auditor Cover Letter ❑CPA Audited 3 points ❑CPA Other/reviewed 2 points ❑Internally prepared 1 point 2. Program Budget A) Is there a change of over 20% in the total program budget line on Table 17 Revenue Source between 2007'Actual and 2008 Budgeted? ❑Yes ❑No If yes, has this been adequately explained.in question 12 B, "Changes to budget"? ❑Yes 0 Points ❑No -2 Points B) On Question 17, are the totals for program budget Revenue or Expenses off by more than $100? ['Yes -3 points ❑No 0 points 3. Balance Sheet Strength Does the program/agency have a positive total net asset figure on the balance sheet? [1]Yes 1 point ❑No © points.,:, 4. Balance Sheet"Liquidity:-: 1 Is the current.ratio atleast 1.10 on the Program /Agency Balance Sheet? (Current assets divided by current liabilities = current ratio). ❑.Yes 2:points O No 0 points 5. Diversified Funding Program'has a'rtiizture of funding sources for 2007 as shown in Question 17, revenue source: ❑ At least 1 each City, Other Government Funds and Private Sources 3 points ❑ Has funding from at least two of the three types listed above. 2 points ❑Only City funding sources, but receives funding from more than one city. 1 point SCORE: / 9 Rating Tool p. 5 Draft of 4/15/08 H:\HS 08\09-10 Funding cycle\Rating TooI414financeupdate.doc SECTION 4. Staff check (Mary Ann and Dianne): make sure numbers in t:bles match. Score based on the number of boxes checked "Yes" Yes No ❑ ❑ #5 Total project costs need to match the totals on #17. ❑ ❑ #6 Total City funds requested for 2008 and requested for 2009 must match numbers given in table #17. ❑ ❑ Last column of#6 must match first column of#14C. ❑ ❑ Average cost of service per client for Renton in#12C must match same in #14C ❑ ❑ Last column of#13 must match middle column of#14C. ❑ ❑ In #13 - column two percentages must add to 100%. ❑ ❑ In #13 - if agency selected individuals or households, should be answered the same in question #15. ❑ ❑ #13 1st column numbers must match numbers on the top of.#15. • ❑ ❑ Three columns in #17, p: 19 (Revenue Source) add correctly? ❑ ❑ Three columns in #17 p:.20 (Program Expense) add correctly'? SCORE: / 10 Rating Tool p. 4 Daft of 4/15/08 H:\HS 08\09-10 Funding cycle\Rating Tool414financeupdate.doc • SECTION 3. Dianne: For informational purposes this year: Agency's Past Performance Past Funding History for last two funding cycles 2005-2008 (Circle CDBG or GF) Amount Allocated: 2005-2006 CDBG / GF 2007-2008 CDBG / GF Yes No ❑ ❑ Were quarterly reports on time in `07? ❑ ❑ Was first quarter report in '08 submitted on time? ❑ ❑ Did agency meet 100% of all the performance measures in 2007? If not— which ones did they not meet? ❑ ❑ Did agency submit an annual outcome report, on time for '07? ❑ ❑ Was a monitoring visit done? If yes, were there any findings'? Yes _ No ❑ ❑ Did agency staff respond to staff requests for information:in a timely manner? (looking for a pattern, not one-time occurrences),;in 2007? ❑ ❑ Did agency staff attend the City of Renton-contract workshop`in 07? ❑ ❑ Did agency staff attend,the Joint City funding workshop in 2008? ❑ ❑ Was there key staff turnover inR2007? If so, what position(s) and how many? • ,rah, No Score Rating Tool p. 3 Draft of 4/15/08 H:\HS 08\09-10 Funding cycle\Rating Tool414financeupdate.doc