The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReport 1Pictures of the property at 2621 Meadow Place North NE corner of existing house. North side of house , addition to extend from th is side Mid-level to be removed NW corner of property. From SW corne r, of South side of house RECEl 'o~Q,ort and shed to be removed MAR 2 5 2015 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION () ;~ *·-f ):,. ~;; ~f' ... ._, (} (''~ ;,:: ·,..-' r-.·~ "'- n )> ' w ! ~ a I f) - z ' () ~ .. ll () () .. 11 :,. z 0 , ~ i i ' • ~ • ' +- ' I: 1; ' ' i~ IE i, ' 11 ' ! i -i.i _, b • l ! • I!! i :!l § I+ + I 11 ' 7---- - -~ -~-:u_ I I ! II I t : I l . ~ ,~ J.1~,=-..~- ' i: i~ re ----j'--- I ! ,, il1 ' I ~~ Ii ii~ i .~, ,_, --,-, I i, "· i•. ,. 1J. 1, I~ I I .,,, ''t i !!' I: 1: ' _, ' .,~~~ ,o I I ~ ----4 ! ., ' I ! -------·-----PU -----------1 ,ii ----N - i ':'-~ __ _j_ __ s , ,,.,. SC-•_:__ '' ii ~d,_y Komamiski Residence 2621 Meadow Pl N Renton, WA 98056 -' i; u ;..::: ~J ~ ! l :J;: • C> i l .~.~ -, ! 'J u z J f i ' i ~ ' i I L _t ' "' 1 • • 5 f ~ [ ~ !!T I " '" ~A ' < " ti; l '.!j' I: h--~~-,s·_.. .,_-,!]_ 2":' •,-""~1:'::'.:'-~~W "EoC-"'"''" ., .. -· 1~-, ;_ l I k !~· ~ ~~ 0/ l l~ .. __ .., ____ ,_ F " '• ~111 ~,y ,, ! I~ r -- f-i ,, li i~ _c ,.. ____ "!,~,,1""'-...1--4' Komarniski Residence 2621 Meadow Pl N Renton, WA 98056 I ---_J ,----+-, I: --1 z i I ! -s: ;,o ·;c, r~1 = 0 "·_...::, r,1 <:11 ~ < ... " 1·,1 _r 0 ! ! •• i C i t ~ )> • ' • I CTI a' i : i ~ C> ' Q ' :Jl I § I 1, 1111-i~11 trl, I I ' I I I' -J,_ ------,.,~,, J I I Komamiski Residence 2621 Meadow Pl N Renton, WA 98056 -----, ffl!!II @ Q~ fo I R lit1 ~g _f~ iii• I'! U1d &•1•11 •• ul!!11 i~ •I!'' ' n DD : ~ > -- -- I I • --- I I ~--- ' j r-s_ I :, ,I Ii ,j i ! [ Jo / ! '! I '· -- i~ n ,' ---.. ~-- I - i ~- - D D El ---- - ----- I ' I - D': -----c __ l ~ r ,1 n 'I U I 11 I - ~-- ! ' I I ' i UJll1[11 I I / or I ! i ~,' -1 w11 r1;1 I I 6~ I I I,,. ---I ! !~J L. tJ , z~ ~ 1 111111 I ' D1 11_ 11: j DIIDLJ /: 1_-1 1: - I I I I ! I I I I I : ; J-....... I r .I l f i ~ i -' ![ Komamiski Residence @ ,, ! l~~ )> ' Q f l ~¥ I ~ --1 ! ! & ~ m 2621 Meadow Pl N I• Hi . ~ !! ' ,-z ' : Cl ' g ~ Renton, WA 98056 -' •l! J w i s 8' " ~ I z !I qi ii )> • ' g· --I t a! ~ iii m ~ .. ' ' I I ' i f l • / j l '• i \ , I ., ! • I I Komamiski Residence 2621 Meadow Pl N Renton, WA 98056 I n er----t-I ----'--, : I r: I I ' i' 1: i i 1!1 1:1 I ' :;1 I @ ~~ 1£ '! i; I r fl h !! l i~ !1 !l ! r CI1Y OF RENTO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNI1Y & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: June 29, 2015 To: City Clerk's Office From: Sabrina Mirante Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office Project Name: 2621 Meadow Pl N LUA (file) Number: LUA-15-000193, V-A Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Clark H. Close Acceptance Date: April 7, 2015 Applicant: Eric Komarnski Owner: Contact: PID Number: 0523059045 ERC Determination: Date: Aaaeal Period Ends: Administrative Decision: Approved Date: June 9, 2015 Aaaeal Period Ends: June 23, 2015 Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Anneal Period Ends: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Variance from the provisions of the Renton Municipal Code (RMC) regulating front yard setbacks for primary single family structures in the Residential -8 dwelling unit per acre (R-8) zone (RMC 4-2-llOA). The zoning is subject to interim zoning Ordinance No. 5724. The applicant is proposing a 13.35-foot front yard setback in order to accommodate a future expansion of the existing new single family residence at 2621 Meadow Pl N. The lot is 10,080 square feet in area. The variance would be to allow a 13.35-foot front yard setback where a 25-foot front yard setback is required. Access to the property is by private drive (Meadow Pl N) and the home is located at the end of the drive. No trees will be removed as part of the addition. Additionally, the existing attached carport and shed will be removed. Location: 2621 Meadow Pl N ICommeou, ERC Determination Types: DNS -Determination of Non-Significance; DNS·M -Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated; DS -Determination of Significance. I ·'-"'---Denis Law ---S City o(, --=Mayo~r ---~1~~01®.Dl June 30, 2015 Eric Komarniski 2621 Meadow Pl N Renton,vVA 98056 Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator SUBJECT: 2621 Meadow Pl. N Variance LUA15-000193, V-A Dear Mr. Komarniski: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended June 23, 2015 for the Administrative Variance approval. No appeals were filed, therefore, this decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant should be aware that the Administrative Variance decision will expire two {2) years from the decision date of June 9, 2015. If they are unable to commence construction or otherwise implement effectively the variance granted within the two- year time-frame, a single one {1) year extension may be requested in writing, pursuant to RMC 4-9-250B.18. If you have any questions regarding the report and decision issued for this variance proposal, please call me at {425) 430-7289. Sincerely, Clark H. Close Associate Planner cc: Autumn Scott, Marleen Mandt, John McTigue / Party(ies) of Record Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMM. ITV AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT • r .. c .. ityof. ----- ------~1i_srJ [(JIJ 0 ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE REPORT & DECISION A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST REPORT DATE: Project Nome: Project Number: Project Monoger: Owner/Applicant: Contact: Project Summary: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Area: June 9, 2015 2621 Meadow Pl N Variance LUA15-000193, V-A Clark H. Close, Associate Planner Eric Komarniski 2621 Meadow Place N Renton, WA 98056 Same as above The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Variance from the provisions of the Renton Municipal Code (RM() regulating front yard setbacks for primary single family structures in the Residential -8 dwelling unit per acre (R-8) zone (RMC 4-2-llOA). The zoning is subject to interim zoning Ordinance No. 5724. The applicant is proposing a 13.35-foot front yard setback in order to accommodate a future expansion of the existing new single family residence at 2621 Meadow Pl N. The lot is 10,080 square feet in area. The variance would be to allow a 13.35-foot front yard setback where a 25-foot front yard setback is required. Access to the property is by private drive {Meadow Pl N) and the home is located at the end of the drive. No trees will be removed as part of the addition. Additionally, the existing attached carport and shed will be removed. 2621 Meadow Pl N 2,800 sf Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): -1,030 sf Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): -2,198 sf 10,080 sf Total Building Area GSF: -4,463 sf Project Location Map Variance Report 15-000193 City of Renton Department of Commu, Economic Development 2121 MEADOW PL N SETBACK VAR/A_~_ Report of June 9, 2015 ! 8. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: Administrative Variance Report & Decision LUAl5·000193, V·A Page 2 of 7 The applicant, Eric Komarniski, is requesting approval of an Administrative Variance from RMC 4-2-llOA in order to complete an addition to the existing single-family residence at 2121 Meadow Pl N (APN 0523059045). The proposal includes an addition to the front of the home that would encroach into the front yard setback of the lot. The two-story addition, with a daylight basement, would be setback 13.35 feet from the north property line. The front yard setback is required to be setback a minimum of 25 feet from the front yard (north propertly line) per Ordinance No. 5724 (Exhibit 6). The new addition would comply with the side yard setback development standard on the west side of the lot by exceeding the 7.5-foot side yard setback requirement (8.51' setback from the west property line) of single-family residences in the R-8 zone. The existing single-family structure has the following approximate setbacks from the existing property lines: front (north) 35 feet, side (west) 22 feet, rear (south) 18 feet, and side (west) 26 feet. The existing home encroaches into the current rear yard setback of the R-8 zone. The lot is one of four lots that maintain access by a private drive (Meadow Pl N). It is the furthest lot from Meadow Ave N and is located at the end of the 400-foot private drive. On-site, there is a regulated slope (>25% & <=40%) on the west third of the property that slopes to the west. The proposed 13.35- foot front yard would face the side yard of the lot to the north (2719 Meadow Pl N). I C. EXHIBITS: ID. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit 1: Variance Report Exhibit 2: Neighborhood Detail Map Exhibit 3: Site Plan Exhibit 4: Floor Plans (A3.0, A4.0 and AS.OJ Exhibit 5: Elevations (A7.0 and A7.1) Exhibit 6: Ordinance No. 5724 Exhibit 7: Code Interpretation -Cl-64 Exhibit 8: Email chain: Komarniski FINDINGS: Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now makes and enters the following: 1. Request: The applicant has requested approval of an Administrative Variance from RMC 4-2-llOA for a front yard setback of 13.35 feet where a minimum of 25 feet is required. 2. Administrative Variance: The applicant's administrative variance submittal materials comply with the requirements necessary to process the administrative variance request. The applicant's neighborhood vicinity map, site plan and other project drawings are provided as Exhibits 2-5. Variance Report 15-000193 City of Renton Department of Commu. 2121 MEADOW PL N SETBACK VAR/A Report of June 9, 2015 Economic Development Administrative Variance Report & Decision WAlS-000193, V-A Page3of7 3. Existing Land Use: The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation of the site is Residential Single Family (RSF) and the site contains an existing single-family home built in 1960. 1. North -Residential Single Family (RSF) 2. South -Residential Single Family (RSF) 3. East -Residential Single Family (RSF) 4. West -Residential Low Density (RLD) 4-Zoning: The subject property is in the Residential -8 dwelling units per net acre (R-8) zone, which is currently under interim zoning per Ord. No. 5724 and as amended by Cl-64 (Exhibits 6 & 7). 5. Topography: The site slopes to the west, and contains steep slopes along the west property edge. 6_ Lots and Building Size: The total area of the lot is 10,080 square feet and the finished building size would be roughly 4,463 square feet. I E-CONSISTENCY WITH VARIANCE CRITERIA: Section 4-9-2508.5 lists 4 criteria that the Planning Director is asked ta consider, along with all other relevant information, in making a decision on an Administrative Variance application. These include the following: The Planning Director shall have authority to grant an administrative variance upon making a determination, in writing, that the conditions specified below have been found to exist: 1. The applicant suffers practical difficulties and unnecessary hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, and location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The applicant contends that special circumstances apply to the subject site as a result of the location of the existing home to the four property lines and the private street. Setbacks required in the interim R-8 zone are as follows: 25 feet front yard; 17.5 feet side yard along a street (including access easements and increase to 25 feet per Cl-64); 7.5 feet side yards (combined 15 feet with not less than 5 feet on either side per Cl-64); and 25 feet rear yard. The front yard of the subject property is oriented toward the north; two side yards are along the east and west sides of the property; and the rear yard is located to the south. Therefore, the applicant is proposing to reduce the required 25-foot front yard setback to 13.35 feet in order to keep the existing home through a remodel rather than tear down the existing structure and construct a new home. The applicant maintains that the main feature that the existing home lacks is a two-car garage. The proposed plan includes an addition to the front of the house that would include a two-car garage and some updating to the rest of the home. The applicant asserts that he wouldn't be able to add a two-car garage without obtaining a variance from the setback regulations due to the current position of the home on the lot; therefore, given the perimeters and existing conditions of the site, applicant contends that the variance is necessary due to the parameters and existing location of the home on the lot (Exhibit 3). Variance Report 15-000193 City of Renton Deportment of Commu, 2121 MEADOW PL N SETBACK VAR/A Report of June 9, 2015 Economic Development Administrative Variance Report & Decision LUAlS-000193, V-A Page 4 of 7 As part of the remodel and addition, the applicant is proposing to remove the existing carport and shed located along the east side of the structure in order to balance the impervious surface of the new addition. Staff concurs that the location of the existing single-family home, in relationship to the configuration of the lot, creates a developable challenge when making an addition to the existing single-family home. An addition to either the front of the house or a Iterative in place of the carport and shed on the east side of the home would be limited without a variance. In either case, the only way the applicant would be able to meet the setback requirements of the zone would be through a 10-foot wide addition to the front of the house (north elevation) or roughly a 600 square foot building footprint to the east elevation (upon the removal of the existing carport). Because of the location of the existing home, staff concurs with the applicant that special circumstances apply to the subject property by adhering strictly to all of the yard setback requirements. The relationship of the single-family home to the existing property lines restricts the size, placement, and orientation ofthe addition to the house. Requiring the applicant to comply with the front yard setback regulations would impose an undue hardship on the applicant. As part of the addition, the applicant would adhere to the side yard setback requirements along the west property line. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: The applicant contends that the proposed front yard setback would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated. The front of the proposed addition to the existing single-family house would be 13.35 feet from the north front property line and 8.51 feet from the west property line. The proposed 13.35-foot front yard setback would abut the side yard of the developed property at 2719 Meadow Pl N to the north (Exhibits 2 and 3). The northwest corner of the addition would maintain an 18-foot setback from the existing residence located to the north. The applicant maintains that he has reviewed the proposed plans with the neighbors and has not received any negative feedback prior to submitting the variance application. Staff believes that this would provide adequate building separation between the proposed addition and the existing structures. In the field, the separation between the two structures acts more like a side yard setback, which requires a minimum 15-foot separation for new construction. Therefore, staff concurs with the applicant that the proposal would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone. No comments were received from neighboring property owner to the north. During the public comment period, the applicant experienced a major sewer blockage that required the applicant to dig-up and repair the sewer line from the asphalt road, west of the property line. At the time of the sewer repair, the site received heavy rain causing residue to filter down the slope onto the asphalt road. Public comment relating to this matter was received in the form of phone calls and emails (Exhibit 8). The R-8 interim zoning ordinance (Ord. No. 5724) also limits building coverage to 40% and maximum impervious surface is limited to 55% of the site. Based on the applicant's site plan, staff estimates the existing single-family building footprint at 1,403 square feet. The addition would Variance Report 15-000193 City of Renton Department of Commw 2121 MEADOW PL IV SETBACK VARIA1 Report of June 9, 2015 Economic Development Administrative Variance Report & Decision WAlS-000193, V-A Page 5 of 7 have a footprint of roughly 1,030 square feet for a total single-family building footprint of 2,433 square feet (Exhibit 3). With overhangs, the area was calculated to be 3,014 square feet (30%). The existing asphalt driveway adds roughly 1,674 square feet to the overall impervious area; upon the removal of the existing carport and the shed, staff estimates the impervious surface to be approximately 4,688 square feet (46.5%). As demonstrated above, it appears the proposed development would comply with both the building coverage and impervious surface coverage standards of the zone. 3. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: The applicant contends that the proposed front yard setback variance would not constitute a grant of special privilege. With the adoption of the R-8 zoning, a majority of the existing homes in the Kennydale neighborhood fail to comply with the 25-foot front yard setback requirement. Therefore, staff believes that approval of a reduced front yard setback would not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone. Front yard setbacks within the immediate vicinity are consistently less than the existing 25-foot front yard setback requirement. 4. That the approval as determined by the Planning Director is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: The applicant contends that the request for a 13.35-foot rear yard setback is the minimum variance needed to accomplish the goal of constructing a future two-car addition to the existing single-family residence. While a house with a smaller building footprint would satisfy the required front yard setback, the requested 13.35-foot front yard setback is the minimum variance needed to accomplish the applicant's desired purpose of constructing an adequately sized addition to the existing single- family house. Staff concurs that the variance request to encroach 11.65 feet into the front yard setback is the minimum variance to accomplish the applicant's desired purpose and, therefore, supports the variance for less than the required 25-foot front yard setback in the R-8 zone. IF. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Zoning: The proposed addition would meet the development standards of the interim R-8 zone with the exception of the front yard setback for which the variance from RMC 4-2-llOA (under interim zoning Ord. No. 5724) is being sought. 2. Administrative Variance: The applicant's proposal for a 13.35-foot front yard setback meets the four criteria to be considered in making a decision on a variance request as specified in RMC 4-9- 2508.5: (a) That the applicant suffers practical difficulties and unnecessary hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification; (b) That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated; (c) That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation Variance Report 15-000193 City of Renton Department of Comm uni Economic Development 2121 MEADOW PL N SETBACK VARIAN Report of June 9, 2015 Administrative Variance Report & Decision LUAlS-000193, V-A Page 6 of 7 upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated; (d) That the approval is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. 3. Existing Surrounding Land Uses: The proposal will not result in changes to existing land uses which are single-family residential to the north, south, east, and west. Several houses in the surrounding area have been constructed with front yards less than the required 25-foot setback. 4. Topography: The subject property slopes to the west. Portions near the west property line have slopes over 25%. The project would not impact any protected slopes or result in extensive grading. 5. Building Proposal: The proposal would result in a future addition to the single-family house which would comply with the side yard development standards of the zone. 6. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested variance from RMC 4-2-llOA (under interim zoning Ordinance Number 5724 and Cl-64) to allow a 13.35-foot front yard setback (where a minimum of 25-foot setback is required) in order to accommodate a future expansion of the existing new single family residence at 2621 Meadow Pl N. I G. DECISION: The Administrative Variance for the 2121 Meadow Pl Setback Variance, File No. LUAlS-000193, V-A, is approved. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURE: Jennif~r Henning, Planning Dir~ctor Department of Community & Economic Development TRANSMITTED this 9th day af June, 2015 to the Owner/Applicant/Contact: Eric Komarniski 2621 Meadow Pl N Renton, WA 98056 TRANSMITTED this 9t• day of June, 2015 to the Parties of Record: John McTigue Autumn Scott 4831 35th Ave SW, 311 3155 Center Rd Renton, WA 98126 Chimacum, WA 98325 TRANSMITTED this 9th day of June, 2015 to the following: Jan Conklin, Development Services C.E. "Chip" Vincent, CED Administrator Craig Burnell, Building Official Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager Steve Lee, Development Engineering Manager Fire Marshal Renton Reporter Variance Report 15-000193 {?/tJ {r<r Date Marleen Mandt 1408 N 26th St Renton, WA 98056 City of Renton Department of Commu, 2121 MEADOW PL N SETBACK VAR/A Report of June 9, 2015 Economic Development Administrative Variance Report & Decision LUAlS-000193, V-A Page 7 of 7 H. LAND USE ACTION APPEALS, REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION, & EXPIRATION The administrative land use decision will become final if it is not appealed within 14 days of the effective date of decision. APPEAL: This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on June 23, 2015. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's office, Renton City Hall -7th Floor, (425) 430- 6510. Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required fee to the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days ofthe effective date of decision, any party may request that the decision be reopened by the approval body. The approval body may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the approval body finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14-day appeal time frame. EXPIRATION: The variance(s) approval will expire two (2) years from the date of decision. A variance one {1) year extension may be requested pursuant to RMC 4-9-2506.17. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE: provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning the land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial decision, but to Appeals to the Hearing Examiner as well. All communications after the decision/approval date must be made in writing through the Hearing Examiner. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the appeal by the Court. Variance Report 15-000193 2621 Meadow Place N. ll!O~ l,,,_1121• J I w )• I•' N 28"' Pl J2f1 • Neighborhood Detail Map .2802 ,..J 'J-Ti -II 1'3 1321. J iii I 144 ~ .. °' I (1444 -~=T'!-r-~r' 1 J7j16 ;{ -1303 1,1·3'(, 9 t, 113 -ti )jv:< /<> I 27i12 1-;r,_21.J .1r 0 -1 • 0/,7w"'~ 11 w , •LI ' / ~ /// "/ <i),15 J-'[1° ~ "'v I'", '-, , _ ,,, ~ 1 . -,\ \/ 1211 .._1224 l • ;-1310/ ,HJ>1 • I ,P,~@J.~it. \ \ •• \i, W/ I a; / // 51 _\ ' -'\ '· , • <I<(--------26$/ 261 2816 /i 16,i>---. V 3 t ~ t1312 e //" Meadow IN 111,ji .; ' // t; ~/r,.. ·-1 1011,~ e) N27"a/ ~ I I, Jf761~ 2610 . IHF• •, • 1 J ,j 9 ~, 1\3 J-6 L"'..J • o -.1202 .i-•1 z l,'OJ \>< _ I t2•b1 Jw• ~262~ · t-2 6o7~-.. I ·,. 1208 . ..: 05 1308~/ 6. e . • ! ~10 '-• r 1" • 14 .-... , • '-~-----i.__<12 > ~ .. I I 13li1, Jl I .14 ', ~ -::-J-_, ------I t • 1 ---I tl5"' ~s '\.. Locat~ ""'1-• ts~ I , ·~ t'-,130 • , ... O j '\~"'"'. ·. . J"'f • / f e 1 •' e/ ';.313• •w ",soo J- 5 •1•· , 1 , , 305 1 -. · I I O \.,\-----.\--T-11 -::/ / ' '> r.; nr.; -/ ', 25 • "'ly /·---I ., // \ \ Iii I .. Q/ " A \ I ,./ .......... / EXHIBIT 2 Scale 1" "' 200' • N m >< ::c M 1:1::1 ~ w ' ... q -~--~, I en z I ! l; • { ~ c:, I z r (I ~ "' TI § "' ~ ), z !Ii ! H ' ja ii ~j i! I ; ~ 1 ·i I ! I :!l 0 • " ~ I p ,j, r, ii: Hi ,, '! ., .. .,. ii X,\ / ~: -' ' ' ' ' ' ! I ----------,! 1 ' -~ \"' ...L:!:.. p--l----+--------< '. k ~ •-' w· ,_,. """ , ..• ,,,. ,.~ ,..,. I ~ : .c]~!®,® lljii~J !~ 5~ ~: ~iP! ~H ~;\! !~i M~! l~! H lj 1! ip p M!li ii ii j, j!ij! ii ilj iii !,i 'lj f''.!l tr a~ g ~ ~ • 11,''; ,, ij ,! ,, !! ! :' !!' lj g.., oi ~~ ~ij~ I i 1,1!•1 !1 '! ,, 'ii·· .. lr i,1 1., h ,!,,!!'!! I.,:, n ~ n~ j !i 1!!i ! 1 'I !iji! !1 :I 1j! 1;! ill '! 1, ,, h• \ H I. ·1 j 1 : ! ! I i!i:1 I i ! 11u H !i ·i m 'Ii 0 ' ~!.I' i ,, '~~ f !I" ~ ~! ~ ' " Komamiski Residence 2621 Meadow Pl N Renton, WA 98056 r:1: ~j" ., ..IQ~ > illi ii!~ -n i ·" " i'" r ,! ~ ~ a ~ ~n " ~: ~ lH l ,, ! ., 0 1t I ! ? • I I C> I z " 11 > 7 II I • i ~ ' ., m •. i " ~ H .. Pl-I..... >'°ll" I ,,_______ - , I I , 1· ~ ": ' ,, I 'I r i _ ,, '! s! !1 ~~ ,, ' I ' i ' i • f ! I [ijL 111 ', ( &'?>e ~o ' " " ' ' I! :; e ii I ifl -1,iei~ U.D ,·&,:;, 0 ' Ii~ ------·1 ";·A/i ' 1•; , __ ., ' 3.:t.-i ' !@ ,,, Pl .. 1 ·.i· •.. .,,. ,.. Ii ,. ~.i. ! I-~ ,;,.L-! 5 =";'= ! ,l--'-""-r-------'"'-------,-' Komamiski Residence 2621 Meadow Pl N Renton, WA 98056 ~ ' I ' 11 ,. II i-o I! :;:; . I • z <-.. .. m " 11 r () () " .. I )> z I I !fl )> • f ~ I ~ i ~ 0 1:· ' ~: ~----+~r---------------------- I 1; ~------------------- ' ' -----''C<"~c, I ~S~ FICT 2 z ,._. ,·-· l !~ i!p1 ' ... ... I ""'·6· ..., .• v) I ,, I " ll la ~~ 3~ ~r ~~ !~ ~H !I~~ ~~~ ii.~! p~ ~; jii ~~ ·t~ ~i~ ~~ p~ ~~~ m ,,, !! u ~1 ~i~ p ~ Ii 11 !! !i Ii! !!1 1!! iii ()~~ ;~~ ai ~i ~~ ?•z l n in 1 l i • • • p ~" ,., ~;11 • 1' r · 1,· -·' i -~ ,.., ~o p 1l 1 11 ! i ! 1 , ,! !Hi,ij li;i;4 .I;;; ~~ •;!! I! ,, Ii I\ i I ' ., ,, , r f,' ~ ;~ ?~ ~ i i CTi~ ~~ ~ ~ ; l 1 I ! ,, '! -' i! ' I ! ' ~ 0 ~!c '~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ! • • 0 C I J Komarniski Residence lffi!'I :g ~ I ! '·1,dl ~ 2621 Meadow Pl N 1Ml1 1!11111 :0 Renton, WA 98056 ~ 11,,, ' ""II '11 l r J; ~ ., i,;r !I~ l i ',! ! !)§ ~~ ~; -' 0';~ § ~t , 1• 1 8~ 5 ! ~im ® i(E> l!i I 'i II I f I, ,, 11! lf m >< ::c t-1 ta t-1 -4 u, ~ c:::, I L-,-:j ,,, ::1 ,,, ::! 1:1 ,, ::1 ,,, ::1 ::1 ,, ''I Lt.:-----:. ,---i: ,, " ,, " " " " " " " ,, " " " " " :: 0 1 DD, D D EJ D D D D l· U-----H+---+-i /J--------1 I 1 qi ~ ! I ' i ' ! . ; I i • m ~ ti. ii 11 11 I ! ,, I " ii I' ! Komamiski Residence 2621 Meadow Pl N Renton, WA 98056 i 0 i ! ' n----4--+-------'-l " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " I 11 '· 1! d r ) 8 " '"=~~ u---n-tt===.---1 '" " " : DODOO H· -J--,1,, ..... -""----ll.JIL---'1 ==--, " I : f+--~~-~~ I 'EJ mooo w 0 mooo ii o -- i i ii lffll'I , le11!I i~•II i :!I! 1,,1 i·~ I 11 1 ~ , ~ !I ~ ' '• I , i," )> -.J ~ ' ~ 0 t 0 i ' il l , I ,, ' ' Ii I • i! ' • I ~ I ' ,- C I i~:::::::~'-+----.--'--------'-I>--+--~ " " " " " " " " " " " " " " :: " ,, ,, :: " " " " " " " " " " :: " " " 'i !. Ii ,, !, )l I " I! I' ! : I I I i(DD !~DD ~----+----U-----l------l-------+-___, !I q, Ii ! i . if • I • ! ! i ! i ~ m ;f ' ~-• 1-;-I --,I : ... 1 ---11 ~ IC----.! : I I 1---------1 I I ~+---' I I -8, D !B:lBD iBi~iBD I /i I ii ce+J.~l ----'-J____--------1 I I I • Komamiski Residence 2621 Meadow Pl N Renton, WA 98056 1111111 ® ,1!,11, 'f I' J: I I!! :1•1•11 I, 1111111 ,, •l!l ,~ ~ CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 5724 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING INTERIM ZONING REGULATIONS FOR R-4 (RESIDENTIAL FOUR DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND R-8 (RESIDENTIAL EIGHT DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) ZONES, CHANGING HEIGHT LIMITS FOR AN IDENTIFIED AREA, AND CHANGING CERTAIN AREAS ZONED AS R-10 (RESIDENTIAL TEN DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO R-4 AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the City has the authority to adopt an interim zoning ordinance pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220, 36.70A.390 and 36.70.790; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that there is a need for an interim zoning ordinance to regulate residential development in certain zones as the City considers and analyzes options for creating a new zone and rezoning some areas; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 3, 2014, before the Planning Commission to take testimony on the interim zoning; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The City Council makes the following findings: 1. The purpose of this interim 20ning ordinance is: a. To continue to permit new development in a manner that improves the compatibility of new development with existing development in the surrounding community and with potential changes in zoning code; and 1 EXHIBIT 6 ---------------------------------------------.. ~~-------- ORDINANCE NO. 572 1+ b. To allow the City adequate time to consider and develop new zoning code regulations, as well as potential rezones of some areas. 2. The City is currently engaged in developing a work program to study and analyze creating a new single family residential zone and to rezone some areas. 3. The development standards for primary and attached accessory structures for all property zoned Residential Eight Dwelling Units per Acre (R-8) and development in the Residential Four Dwelling Units per Acre (R·4} zone using small lot cluster provisions, are indicated below. Development standards for R-8 and R-4 for small lot cluster developments that are not itemized below shall be the standard for the R-8 zone as it exists in RMC Title IV. These standards include but are not limited to Residential Design and Open Space Standards, Development Standards for Residential Development for Detached Accessory Structures, and the Zoning Use Table. a. Minimum lot size shall be seven thousand (7,000} square feet; b. Minimum lot width shall be 60 feet; c. Minimum lot width, for corner lots, shall be seventy feet (70'); d. Minimum lot depth shall be ninety feet (90'); e. Minimum front setback shall be twenty-five feet (25'); f. Minimum rear setback shall be twenty-five feet (25'); g. Minimum side setback shall be seven and one half feet (7.5') h. Minimum side setback, along a street, shall be seventeen and one half {17 Y,'); 1. Maximum height shall be thirty feet (30'); 2 ORDINANCE NO. 5 7 2 4 j. Maximum building coverage shall be forty percent (40%); and k. Maximum impervious surface shall be fifty-five percent (55%). 4. The maximum height allowed for all property within the area identified in Attachment A as the South Renton area is thirty feet (30'). 5. The area zoned as Residential Ten Dwelling Units per Acre (R-10) on Attachment Bis Residential Four Dwelling Units per Acre (R-4). SECTION Ill. This is hereby declared an emergency in order to protect the public safety, health and general welfare and this Ordinance shall take effort immediately upon its passage. PASSED BY THE CITYCOUNCILthis 22nd day of September 2014. y APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this ZZnd day of_S_e_p_t_e_m_be_· r ___ ~Z014. Approved as to form: of..., ••t.· wL7AJr.--, ....... ..,""--- Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: 9/26/2014 (Summary) ORD:1836:9/16/14:scr 3 Denis Law, Mayor Department of Community and Economic Development Planning Division ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY/CODE INTERPRETATION ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY /CODE INTERPRETATION#: Cl-64 MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS: Ordinance 5724 Interim Zoning Standards, and 4-2-llOA, Development Standards for Residential Zoning Designations (Primary and Attached Accessory Structures) REFERENCE: N/A SUBJECT: Side Yard Setback Requirements adopted under Ordinance 5724 BACKGROUND: Interim zoning standards were adopted under Ordinance 5724, which superseded adopted development standards for the R-8 zone. These interim development standards included increasing the required 5-foot side yard setback to 7 .5 feet and increasing the required 15-foot side yard along a street setback to 17.5 feet. These interim standards were adopted in anticipation of the City Council rezoning certain R-8 zoned properties to a new R-6 zone. The new R-6 zone and associated development standards were adopted under Ordinance 5744 amending RMC 4-2-llOA, Development Standards for Residential Zoning Designations. Ordinance 5744 requires the following side yard setback: "combined 15 ft. with not less than 5 ft. on either side", which provides more flexibility than the 7 .5-foot side yard setback adopted under Ordinance 5724. In addition, the side yard along a street setback was increased to 25 feet. JUSTIFICATION: The interim standards adopted under Ordinance 5724 were adopted quickly to prevent the development of R-8 zoned properties to R-8 development standards, when R-6 development standards may be more compatible with surrounding development patterns. The standards adopted under Ordinance 5744 were thoroughly vetted through the public process including the Planning Commission and City Council, whereas the interim standards were quickly adopted with less public input. Therefore, projects which are vested to the interim standards under Ordinance 5724 should be subject to the side yard and side yard along a street setback requirements adopted under Ordinance 5744. DECISION: Projects vested to the interim zoning standards adopted under Ordinance 5724 shall be required to comply with the side yard and side yard along a street setback requirements adopted under Ordinance 5744. H:\CED\Planning\Title IV\Docket\Admini~trative Policv Code lnteroretation\Cl-64\Code lnterpretation.docx EXHIBIT 7 ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL: DATE: APPEAL PROCESS: CODE AMENDMENTS NEEDED TO C. E. "Chip" Vincent February 27, 2015 To appeal this determination, a written appeal--accompanied by the required filing fee--must be filed with the City's Hearing Examiner (1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, 425-430-6515) no more than 14 days from the date of this decision. Your submittal should explain the basis for the appeal. Section 4-8-110 of the Renton Municipal Code provides further information on the appeal process. IMPLEMENT DETERMINATIONS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Jill Ding Cl-64 Page 2 of 2 Clark Close From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Hey IViarcie, Eric <ericelko@yahoo.com> Thursday, April 16, 2015 8:06 AM 'Marcie Palmer' Clark Close RE:2621 Good to get more information on that property. The neighbors to our West believe that the asphalted area is their property and had a limited easement for Sally's access. It is their understanding that the easement ended when she passed. Someone would have to review the easement language to fully understand the reality of what the current standing is. Our variance application would not be effecting anyone not directly to our West or North. We are only able to go North for a 2 car garage without coming even closer to the property lines. So, we believe, given the limited options for us, the least obtrusive way to build would be to the North. Our setbacks to the West and East will be within the current code. Since our addition is on the North side of our property, it will only effect one of the properties around us. With the weather turning drier, we should have very little run-off from our excavation before the vegetation begins to grow back. But, we will get out and clean off the asphalt this weekend and put up the silt fence just to make sure things are in good shape from now on. Eric From: Marcie Palmer [mailto:pkplmarcie@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 6:40 AM To: Eric Cc: Marcie Palmer; CClose@rentonwa.gov; Autumn Scott; Jake Vom Estee Mandt Subject: Re: 2621 Hi Eric, Thanks for the email. I had some correspondence from neighbor Marleen and Sally's daughter Autumn (copied above) inquiring about the variance you folks have to build the new garage, and mentioned the mud. Yes, my family walks this route on a daily basis (to/from the school bus). We watch over and take care of Sally's house since her family isn't local. Her address is actually 1305 N. 28th St., not 26th, so this has always been the main access to her home. I have not heard anything about closing the access. EXHIBIT 8 Sally's family would like any additional information that might affect her property. Her home is not for sale, and no decisions have been made about the future. Thanks for reaching out, Eric. We will all learn together! Marcie On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Eric <ericclko@yahoo.com> wrote: Hey Marcie, I heard there was some dirt/mud below our home at 2621 that made that asphalt slippery. We had a major sewer blockage that required immediate resolution. We had to dig up the sewer line from the asphalt road below It happened to have rained considerably after we were done that caused some residue to filter onto the asphalt. Will put up a silt fence along the asphalt to mitigate any run-off while the grass and shrubs re-grow on the hillside. Is that an area you are walking regularly? It's my understanding that it is private property and may likely be closed off soon with the passing of Sally Scott. We are working with the surrounding neighbors to determine the best approach to the use of this area. Your input would be appreciated. I' II gel that silt screen up ASAP. E_ric Komamiski 2 NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Ma•t•r Appllcallc>n ha• been fill'd and attep!HI 111ith th• Department ot Community & Economic: Dnolopm•nt (CEO)-Plannlnt oMslon of th• dty cf R.nttlll. Th• lollowlnc brt.ft.,, ducribH th• application and tht n..,;o5Sa,y PubllcApptoval,. OATE OF NOTICE OF Al'l'I.ICATIDN: Aptll 1, 201S PROJlCf NAME/NUMBER: l6:nMeadaw Pl N Variaric•/ 15-000193, ',J./1, PROJECT DESCIUl'TION: The appllant I• requo,tinB app~~•I of an Admlnlrtratlso llori,n<11. Fro'." the pro•lslom of tOe Renton Mum<lpal C<>de (RMC] re1ulatin1 front yard oetbacks hlr pnmU'V "~' family rtru<turH in the Re~dendal. a .:twelllnK ""~ p•r aero (R·B) oor,e II\MC4·:Z..llllA). The zanlns Is ,ubJectto ,nionm 1onln1 Ordlnana, No. 5724. The applicant fs pn,p,:qlnR a lJ.35-loot lront yard ..,!bad< In order to accommodate a Mum "'II'"""" of the @xi,tinll new sinllie family , .. .ionc• at ZE21 Mndaw Pl N. Tot, let Ii l0,080 squan, !eet In ;ir11. Th, varlar,ce wa,l_d be to ,I law a 13.lS-fQot frnnt yard ,ott,adt wMra 115-foot front vard setback Is required. AI:,Hs to tl>e property" bv prn•I• drMI! (Meadow Pl N) and thll ham• 1, located at the e<>d <>I tho dn'le. No 1rees ,oill °"' "'m01/td ;is part al 1N! addtHon. Additionally, the exlstln1 •tblcl...i c:arpon: and ,htd will be rom<Ml!d. PROJECT L.OtATIDN: 2611 Meadow Pl N PHNlm/REVlfW AtQUESTEOt Adminlstridve VaMance APPUCllfit/PROJECTCOHTACT PERSON: Eric Kamamisl<I Camm.ms.., u,,, -· oppUcadon nnm a ,Pbmlned In wrld11111<> Ouk H. Clo,e, Al,adm Pl1nn•, D1pan:mant of comm•nltll a [c""amlc D1volapm1m, lllSll Sauth Grld\l W,,, R...-, WA !l8057, by 5:DO p.m. on April it, llll.!I. _if you have ,..u11ans at>out this proposal, ..-,.;,b to be made a party ol r11tord irld rereMI addltlcnal notU!cadon h'I' ma,I, contact the Projllc:I Manapr at l'-25) 430-7219. AnVoM ,oho submit! wrlt!l!ll <:ommenl!i wli autcmatlcally 1>ewm1 a party of recurd ,nd will be n<>tified of any ded,k>n en this project PLEASE INClUOE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CAW NG FOR PROPER FILE 1DENTlF1CATION DATE OF APPLICATION: MA.ROI Z!i, Z01!i NOTICE OFCOMPl.fTEAPPUCATION: APIII~ 1, 201S 11 you W<>uld like I<> be made I party <>f rHOrd to rea:M! further lnform1tlcn on this proposed prol•ct,. «implete this form and return to: Cit,, o/Aonton, CED, PlannlngDlvi51on, 105S South Grady WJf'(, R•ntcn, WA 98057. File Name/ No.: 2621 1111....tow Pl N 'la~ana: / 15-0001g], V·A ~AM£:--------------------------- MAILJNGADDRfi!i: ____________ CITr/STATE/ZIP·-------- rELEPI-IONENO., ----------- CERTIFICATION I, Ct/172:,e. I{ CL ,sc-, hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted in __2__ conspicuous places or nearby the described property on Date: _ _,_~-1--/""'s;--"u~s~------ STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING Signed:_-=ac..-~_,..,_,_,{L:'--'~'--'--------- I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that C..\ <>-•l<-\.\ • C. \ .. s"' signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary (Print): My appointment expires: __ _,,4:u.o;~..,w;.,,._:\:.___,;i.._'lc;l'-;w=a..:....l'1-,__ ___ _ Leslie Betlach Plan Review Routing Slip Plan Number: Site Address: LUAlS-000193 2621 MEADOW PL N Name: 2621 Meadow Pl N Description: The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Variance from the provisions of the Renton Municipal Code (RMC) regulating front yard setbacks for primary single family structures in the Residential -8 dwelling unit per acre (R-8) zone (RMC 4-2-llOA). The zoning is subject to interim zoning Ordinance No. 5724. The applicant is proposing a 13.35-foot front yard setback in order to accommodate a future expansion of the existing new single family residence at 2621 Meadow Pl N. The lot is 10,080 square feet in area. The variance would be to allow a 13.35-foot front yard setback where a 25-foot front yard setback is required. Access to the property is by private drive (Meadow Pl N) and the home is located at the end of the drive. No trees will be removed as part of the addition. Additionally, the existing attached carport and shed will be removed. Review Type: Date Assigned: Community Services Review-Version 1 04/07/2015 Date Due: 04/21/2015 Project Manager: Clark Close Environmental Impact Earth Animals Air Envi ronmenta I Hea I th Water Energy/Natural Resources Pia nts Housing Land/Shoreline Use Aesthetics Where to enter your comments: Manage My Reviews Which types of comments should be entered: Light/Glare Historic/Cultural Preservation Recreation Airport Environmental Utilities 10,000 Feet Transportation 14,000 Feet Pub Ii c Service Recommendation -Comments that impact the project including any of the Enivornmental Impacts above. Correction -Corrections to the project that need to be made before the review can be completed and /or requesting submittal of additional documentation and/or resubmittal of existing documentation. What statuses should be used: Reviewed -I have reviewed the project and have no comments. Reviewed with Comments -I have reviewed the project and and I have comments entered in Recommendations. Correction/Resubmit -I have reviewed the project and the applicant needs to submit and/or resubmit documentation and I have added corrections in Corrections. 4-q.17 Date ) r NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: April 7, 2015 PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: 2621 Meadow Pl N Variance/ 15-000193, V-A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Variance from the provisions of the Renton Municipal Code (RMC) regulating front yard setbacks for primary single family structures in the Residential -8 dwelling unit per acre {R-8) zone (RMC 4-2-llOA). The zoning is subject to interim zoning Ordinance No. 5724. The applicant is proposing a 13.35-foot front yard setback in order to accommodate a future expansion of the existing new singie family residence at 2621 Meadow Pl N. The lot is 10,080 square feet in area. The variance would be to allow a 13.35-foot front yard setback where a 25-foot front yard setback is required. Access to the property is by private drive (Meadow Pl N) and the home is located at the end of the drive. No trees will be removed as part of the addition. Additionally, the existing attached carport and shed will be removed. PROJECT LOCATION: 2621 Meadow Pl N PERMITS/REVIEW REQUESTED: Administrative Variance APPLICANT /PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Eric Komarniski Comments on the above ap.plication must be submitted in writing to Clark H. Close, Associate Planner. Department of Community & Economic Development, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 p.m. on April 21, 2015. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager at (425) 430-7289. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE DF APPLICATION: MARCH 25, 2015 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: APRIL 7, 2015 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED, Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. eadow Pl N Variance/ 15-000193, V-A ,WR 1 5 2C 1.5 G NAME: -------'>,J---"-.µ,cl:---r-t+.J~-----l.,.l,--~-+'-,>:f-"'~te::_ ___ ,,......---,-,-,---c:-,-----,, MAILING ADDRESS: CITY/SCTATEgl:i_( __Q.,_ 3 (i\ s l )_ G TELEPHONE NO.(d"\"'-'wQ.,__.~--l-,..L--.J---.L--1-~ 11 y \ , \\ \) On the 7th day of April, 2015, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Notice of Application and Acceptance documents. This information was sent to: Eric Komarniski Owner 300' Surrounding Properties See Attached (Signature of Sender): , . I \ '· -----:..-:....----------------.-"". ·''---< POMt .... .::.---ov\ ... ,~'$Wi1111,1 t-rl.S' ·,, ) .::: -,.::: ~ .... ~~ -t...o ,,,, ·~ -""'-2"~ "fAJi" ~ I;;, ".,· STATE OF WASHINGTON ) Ss ::: ; :, ~o ;. "'• ~ _.,. ::::0 (Iii~ / COUNTY OF KING ) f f' -. -c, i Z § ·; (fl t '°ue"'" = o := {, ~ ,,,, 8 (\.,,.: ,;. - I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Sabrina Mirante \ "'1-/11 11,.;~;.,:,,,,'";._'<:'0 _,ff signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for tti1i!I\I/\ARiw~'PPD<l>S '1t ...... ,~- mentioned in the instrument. \\''"'\,., 1 .1crs ) blic in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print): ___ _.i±a=~.,,,l,J ... ·A_·_l?'-',,c ... 1 ... L',.."'"-'c..a.>--------------- My appointment expires: j , ') 'L',• / -:J ·-l>j'~5· -< 1 "' , 2621 Meadow Pl N Variance LUAlS-000193, V-A template -affidavit of service by mailing Eric Komarniski 2621 Meadow Pl N Renton. WA 98056 523059054 523059055 523059078 MCTIGUE JOHN H MCTIGUE JOHN H MILNOR BRUCE A+LYNNE M 483135TH AVE SW #311 2701 Meadow Pl N 1305 N 26TH ST SEATTLE, WA 98126 Renton, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98056 1644510020 523059023 1644510060 MYERS KYLE+VANESSA DEBOUTEZ NGUYEN LAP+NGOC TRAN NWIZUGBO PRISCA O+MARTIN 1224 N 27TH PL 1309 N 26TH ST 1312 N 27TH CT RENTON, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98056 2296500109 523059028 523059073 PIAT2 REBECCA J+KEVIN C REID CHRISTINE RET2LOFF GERALD E+PAMELA S 2609 MEADOW AVE N 1409 N 28TH ST 12 E ROLLING ACRES RENTON, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98056 WEAVERVILLE, NC 28787 523059074 1644510030 1644510040 RET2LOFF GERALD E+PAMELA S ROBISCHON J05H+ALISHA RY ALL ALAN E+ROBIN LEE KLUN 2707 Meadow Pl N 1300 N 27TH PL 1306 N 27TH CT Renton, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98056 2296500150 2296500155 2296500156 SCHEER ROBERT D+BUHRIG AMYL SCOTT JR JAM ES SCOTT JR JAMES 1301 N 26TH ST 4126 GRAVELLY BEACH LOOP NW 140S N 26th St RENTON, WA 98056 OLYMPIA, WA 98502 Renton, WA 98056 1644510050 523059057 523059038 SEN NERT CHRISTOPHER L+MELAN SHURE CHARLES lll+GAYLE A SMITH DAVID M 1310 N 27TH CT 903 N 36TH ST 1308 N 26TH RENTON, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98056 523059060 523059079 2296500108 SULLIVAN CHRISTOPHER E SUTTER RICHARD L+DEBRA VANIK R J 1307 N 28TH ST 1307 N 26TH ST PO BOX 922 RENTON, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98056 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 1644510070 523059059 WICOMB WINSTON N+JEANNE H WRIGHT JAMES B+MICHELE L 1313 N 27TH CT 1321 N 28TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98056 1644510120 AKOPYAN ARMEN G 1220 N 26TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 2296500123 BANASKY HOWARD V 600 ANDOVER PARKE TUKWILA, WA 98188 2296500122 BANASKY PATRICIA 1407 N 26th St Renton, WA 98056 1644510111 BREWIS DANIEL A+LAURIE 2621 PARK AVE N RENTON, WA 98056 523059042 CARLSEN JOHN & JOYCE 1312 N 26TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 2296500122 DESIMONE JOHN G 1409 N 26TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 2296500106 GATH MANN JERRY 2615 MEADOW AVE NORTH RENTON, WA 98056 523059050 HASSINGER FRED+GAYLE J 2717 MEADOW AVE N RENTON, WA 98056 523059056 JOHNSON ROGER E+WAKEMAN LIN 1303 N 28TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 2296500107 LAM NAOMIS 2715 MEADOW AVE N RENTON, WA 98056 523059040 ALVIZ BASILIO G & TESSIE N 16204 SE 261ST PL COVINGTON, WA 98042 2296500124 BANASKY HOWARD V 1313 N 26th St Renton, WA 98056 2296500110 BOEHME JOE 2607 MEADOW AVE N RENTON, WA 98055 523059058 BROWN GLEN 1319 N 28TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 1644510110 CHAN CHAKCHUEN JOSEPH+YUEN 2629 PARK AVE N RENTON,WA 98056 1644510080 ENG RYAN A+SOPHIA YUAN ZHOU 1307 N 27TH CT RENTON, WA 98056 523059046 GEFFRE STEVEN A 2625 MEADOW PL N RENTON, WA 98056 2296500105 HOWELL DENTON C & SHAWN M 2613 MEADOW AVE NORTH RENTON, WA 98056 523059045 KOMARNISKI ERIC L+KATHLEEN 2621 MEADOW PL N RENTON, WA 98056 2296500103 LE HUONG-LANT 2711 MEADOW AVE N RENTON, WA 98056 • 523059041 ALVIZ BASILIO G & TESSIE N 1309 N 28th St Renton, WA 98056 2296500121 BANASKY PATRICIA 4310 NE 5TH CT #102 RENTON, WA 98059 2296500115 BOSCH MA LO REITA JESSIE+OREE 1314 N 26TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 2296500118 BURMAN CRYSTAL 1412 N 26TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 1644510090 CHEN CHRISTINE 5 1128 N 41ST PL RENTON, WA 98056 2296500117 FELL LARRY E 1402 N 26TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 523059074 GEFFRE STEVEN A 2719 Meadow Pl N Renton, WA 98056 2296500119 HUSMOE BRENT 2603 MEADOW AVE N RENTON, WA 98056 1644510100 LAKKAD SHAILEAH+JIGNASA 2637 PARK AVE N RENTON, WA 98056 2296500116 MANDT MARLEEN K 1408 N 26TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 ~is~ ~ ----=Mayo:...r ---~J~llk®T r I April 7, 2015 Eric Komarniski 2621 Meadow Place N Renton, WA 98056 Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Subject: Notice of Complete Application 2621 Meadow Pl N Variance, LUAlS-000193, V-A Dear Mr. Komarniski: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425} 430-7289 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Clark H. Close Associate Planner Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: April 7, 2015 PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: 2621 Meadow Pl N Variance/ 15-000193, V-A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Variance from the provisions of the Renton Municipal Code (RMC) regulating front yard setbacks for primary single family structures in the Residential -8 dwelling unit per acre (R-8) zone (RMC 4-2-llOA). The zoning is subject to interim zoning Ordinance No. 5724. The applicant is proposing a 13.35-foot front yard setback in order to accommodate a future expansion of the existing new single family residence at 2621 Meadow Pl N. The lot is 10,080 square feet in area. The variance would be to allow a 13.35-foot front yard setback where a 25-foot front yard setback is required. Access to the property is by private drive (Meadow Pl N) and the home is located at the end of the drive. No trees will be removed as part of the addition. Additionally, the existing attached carport and shed will be removed. PROJECT LOCATION: 2621 Meadow Pl N PERMITS/REVIEW REQUESTED: Administrative Variance APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Eric Komarniski Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Clark H. dose, Associate Planner, Department of Community & Economic Development, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 p.m. on April 21, 2015. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager at (425) 430-7289. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified ~f any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: MARCH 25, 2015 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: APRIL 7, 2015 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED, Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. File Name/ No.: 2621 Meadow Pl N Variance/ 15-000193, V-A NAME:---------------------------------- MAILING ADDRES5: _______________ CIT'l/5TATE/ZIP: _________ _ TELEPHONE NO.: -------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMUN. AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Planning Division ... ''.'H~ 4 ;J Lu:J ... ,1 " Of-HENTON LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATIONN PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION -, /([) 14-f< /v 15 I-( l ' NAME t::: (< /(., W\ ; .. .1 J:",,, -'1 --1 €5KG:tu PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: c:26c:L/ /#~«JP/. Al PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: ADDRESS: Pt )) alt, 2 t f11 o A-OtJtu c,.c_e , #-6:;L/ M&7!--.0cw /JI, Alt.erl, CITY: /2 €A/TC!l( ZIP: 9'1>05 fJ !<.u1-&-u, M4 9?,t55(; TELEPHONE NUMBER: 7-() 6 _ 3 (, l -~t\6 {) KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): APPLICANT (if other than owner) ~ tl/')~i1 36?:,-9014' NAME: -·"· .. ·---··-·-------EXISTING LAND USE(S): sFR PROPOSED LAND USE(S): COMPANY (if applicable): ~ EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: --- PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CITY: -ZIP: (if applicable) EXISTING ZONING: TELEPHONE NUMBER: R-i CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): NAME:CR.tG /(011414. i: IJ i~ 1<1 . SITE AREA (in square feet): /t'r! $i;(l SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (if applicable): DEDICATED: Al J SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: ADDRESS: °S-14MG A-S t1-BtJll£' ?.ooo PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: ZIP: ACRE (if applicable) AJA- TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: ~o(;, -3b-J -"&ObO NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) A 1 d cx·i(..e.tko@ y11cifa>.coW\ NUMBER OF NEW qw,ELLING UNITS (if applicable): j\J A- 1 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Master Application.doc Rev: 02/2015 PROJECT INFORMATION (continued) ~-------~----------~ NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): CJ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL CJ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS (if applicable): CJ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): -CJ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if CJ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. applicable): CJ SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES sq. ft. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): CJ WETLANDS sq. ft. - LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach leaal descriction on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION _,TOWNSHIP_, RANGE __ , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) ~ bPJ & /<fJM /4-R.AJ /';>;·~(} . declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that I '::rm (please chec_k one) .p....-the current owner of the property involved in this application or __ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. dZQ~~ Signature of Owner/Representative Date Signature of Owner/Representative Date STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Erl ( /Ld'? a.rJ.:J/ fi LJ signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purpose mentioned in the instrument. /(Wt Notary (f>'rint): My appointment expires: 2 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Master Application.doc Rev: 02/2015 PLANNING DIVISION RECEIVED WAIVER OF SUBMITIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Calculations 1 Colored Maps for Display 4 Construction Mitigation Description 2 AND 4 . Deed of Right-of-Way Dedication Densfy Worksheet 4 Drainage Control Plan 2 Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Archltectural 3 AND• Environmental Checklist 4 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy) 4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood Hazard Data 4 Floor Plans a AND • Geotechnical Report 2 AND 3 Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan, Detailed 2 Habitat Data Report 4 Improvement Deferral 2 Irrigation Plan 4 King County Assesso(s Map Indicating Site• Landscape Plan, Conceptual• Landscape Plan, Detailed 4 Legal Description 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards ( one per monument) 1 Neighborhood Detail Map 4 Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis , Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building 4. Planning WAIVED MODIFIED '-,. i l'f Vt ,; 1. iii I Vl'~ BY: BY: ~.QMM~'KIP.;10N C,i,1-C-- C#L- C)(,,1-t:.--- . Ct«, f'€1{. J eNJl,tf'iilZ-µ. . c~ P@!. JBMJ1~ 11-. c~ I I PROJECT NAME: [f21C koHARNIS/q -Vf'r1">.tt'rNCI: '2-62-t MD+l)OW /'j.. N DATE: '1[ 3 / IS- 1 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Walver.;ubmittalreqs.docx Rev:02/2015 PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVE MODIFIED REQUIREMENTS: OBY: BY: Post Office Approval 2 Plat Name Reservation 4 Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 . (.:M<:- Public Works Approval Letter 2 Rehabilitation Plan 4 Screening Detail 4 Shoreline Tracking Worksheet 4 Site Plan 2 ANO 4 Stream or Lake Study, Standard 4 ~ -Stream or Lake Study, Supplemental 4 ~ Stream or Lake Mitigation Plan 4 Ott, Street Profiles 2 . Title Report or Plat Certificate • Topography Map, Traffic Study 2 COMMENTS: Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4 (:f.K--Sti;: p1w.ie?-, N1't7!.!?lffl vc - Urban Design Regulations Analysis 4 Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final • Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4 Wetlands Report/Delineation 4 Wireless: Annlicant Aareement Statement 2 AND 3 lnventorv of Existina Sites o ···~ 3 Lease Aareement, Draft 2 AND, Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Mao of View Area 2 ANO, Photosimulations o AN~· This requirement may be waived by: 1 . Property Services 2-Public Works Plan Review 3. Building 4. Planning . C\1.1-C.. 0~ ~ PROJECT NAME: fRIC K.OMltR!v/Sf:t -Vf\f<JIW(t Zb 7-1 M 1,Aa<>.v I' J... N DATE: ~•/1'> 2 H:\CEO\Oata\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Walversubmittalreqs.docx Rev: 02/2015 M/\U 2· 5 •,•,,c 1,'\ r ~ 1) , ~I PROJECT NARRATIVE C!TY Qi" RENTON PLANNING DIVISION NAME 2621 Meadow Pl N Lot Size 10080 square feet Lower Kennydale Neighborhood in Renton, Washington This remodel project will require a general Residential Building Permit along with all the associated permits for a Single Family Residence project including Plumbing, Electrical, Low-voltage, Gas piping and Fire Sprinkler system. The zoning for this property and all surrounding lots is R-8 currently under an interim zoning ordinance No. 5724. It is currently, and will continue to be used as a single family residence with a house and carport built in 1960. We are proposing to remodel an existing house by primarily adding a two-car garage to the North. This addition will have a garage to the East and a kitchen area to the West. There is a gradual slope to the West on the property which will provide a daylight basement room, and we are planning to put a second story above the garage/kitchen for a master bedroom and offices. The scope of the remodel will include changing the existing house structure removing a "mid-level" floor (approx. 400 sq.ft.) and putting a new roof on the house. There will be a fire sprinkler system installed throughout, along with upgrades and retrofitting as per engineering specifications. Prior to the completion of the remodel, the existing carport and attached shed will be removed. An initial estimate of the cost for this remodel project is around $225,000 including the addition of a new water line from the public street. These costs will be effected by any additional engineering requirements not currently being considered. The value of the structure when completed should be between $750-799,000 under current market conditions. There no particular special features on this site with regards to steep slopes, wetlands, stream, vegetation or soil conditions. The soil is typical for the area with some clay and sandy loam which absorbs water and drains easily. There are a few trees of size on the property, but none that should be affected by our addition as far as we can tell without knowing their root structure. There is no plan to remove any trees at this time. No fill will be involved in this remodel, a small amount (5-10 yards) of soil may be removed during excavation of the foundation. The property is accessed by a private drive (Meadow Place North) and is located at the end of that drive, just over 400 feet from the main street (Meadow Avenue North). There is no plan to provide public rite of way improvements due to being at the end of a private drive. A new water line will be required to provide sufficient water for a whole house sprinkler system. VARIANCE LETTER F-~ THE CITY OF RENTON PANING DIVISION My wife and I purchased the home at 2621 Meadow Place North in Renton in May of 2014 with the express purpose of updating the home and living there for many years. We both find that remodeling instead of tearing down and building new is so much more rewarding and maintains some of the characteristics of the existing home for neighborhood. We completed a remodel to another home a few blocks away in 2008 and look forward to completing another at this new location in the same neighborhood. So, even before we sold that home, we began the process of drawing up the plans for the remodel to the 1960 original floor plan. The main feature this property lacked was a two-car garage. A single family home that is considered "updated" and desirable in this neighborhood must have an attached two-car garage. So, we planned an addition with that two-car garage and some updating to the rest of the home. There is only a small carport on the property that is barely wide enough to accept two cars without any walls or much room between the cars. Enclosing this structure is not an option. Expanding the structure (away from the house) towards the East would not be feasible as it would then not conform to any setback. The best way to create a reasonable two-car garage would be adding to the North of the home and remove the existing carport with attached shed. After considerable months of effort and expense, we had a working set of plans with engineering ready for the permit process. And then we found out that the zoning had just changed and our plans were no longer compliant with the interim zoning. After months of consideration and discussion about possible options and configurations, we believe the only way to provide this property with an attached two-car garage is by obtaining a variance of the front setback regulations. Due to the current positioning of the existing home, there isn't sufficient room to add a two car garage without encroaching into a setback. Given that reality, without the granting of a variance for the addition, we would not be allowed to have a two-car garage. This would significantly diminish any value added to updating the existing home, creating a hardship to our efforts. This property is located over 400 feet from any public street and is 10,000 square feet in size. Even with the addition, we would be over 15 feet from our Northern neighbors' home and compliant on the sides. And, we will be removing the existing carport and shed to the East which helps balance the impervious surface of the new addition. The effect to the neighbors and neighborhood is negligible given the private nature of the drive, and the fact that we are at the very end of that drive. We have reviewed our plans with all close neighbors and have not received any negative feedback. This variance will not effect the use, view or create any limitation of other properties in the vicinity of our home. We reduced the overall width of the garage to less than 23 feet from the preferred 24 feet to reduce the extension into the setback. Any smaller size would make the interior of the garage very tight and shear panels on either side of the garage door more difficult and expensive to engineer. And, we stepped the non-garage area of the house (to the West) in by 4 feet to reduce the setback encroachment along th~ rest of the addition. As you can see, the homes along this lane were not built with any survey or property line in mind. The neighbors home abuts our property line and with property line angled, the our existing house (and new addition) does not set parallel to that line. This makes the setback distance vary, with the average being around 15 feet. Given the expressed requirement of a two-car garage, the difficulty of using any existing structure for that purpose, and the private nature of the location, we are requesting a variance of the front yard setback of 25 feet, to the measurements noted on the site plan. RECEIVED Sincerely, Eric Komarniski MAR 2 5 2015 CITY Cf RENTON PlA.l\i;\iJ:-;c; viv:SlON 2621 Meadow Place N. i N 28th Pl r~Oj J,2~1 e • •1• J~ 0 A Neighborhood Detail Map • .2802 13~ N 111~ 11444 I . j613[ tl-607 r-~---:-i [ I ' _.104 . '. I •·t ~) · ~16~·· t; \ ! . .25f0 I RECEIVED MA.~ 2 5 20!5 C!TY OF RENTON PLANNING DJV!SJON Scale 1" • 200' , I I I j I ! Ii ( r; 1g .p ( // ~r-----./ I I I / ziiii.tllNB IIET&ta( -- / EXIISlll-.iMPIW.T ........,, ~ I I I I I ,I ...... ..=..~~I I I ;· I I .p II ;' I vii~ ~ ~1/~ // I / ... / ..... \..// I ' ~m ·1 / /"""'-'" ' ' // / -' ,/,/ -··... i 1// I/ !! ! --..,....... ill/ j I • :=YI I Vi"' !J./l /!/ 1 1 /<, / I I~ ' # -----, ~--FF•:1111.1' -..-.roE """""' ,, N \ ~~"-----., ...._ Q --------. J / ' --/ l /' / / / / /' ' ) _,/ ···· .. .a,."V/ ,, I ··,., .t,,I / I / ~ 1~l + r , I . y I ; ; ' ,· ' I I '·;;. 'I I ) A Ii J I ' I ' I ',, ·,, -!_r_________ _____ 1 'ECEIVED . ,,,,· ___ /,1 I ) ',, '-,,~',,, I I MAR 2'5 2015 ) '"''' I , , ) '-, 1 qrv OF R"·.r·•rr.M ' I IPLf...'' !l'r' i..,'i '-'1\1 Jo, ..---_,,, l',11,11,"..;.:, c1·;•qo 1111. .. -. N Site Plan O' 1 O' 20' 40' 1"=20' 2621 Meadow Pl N Renton, WA 98056 ~r,~rr')~:·"},/'\J d-2> _1 _.~j ( RECEIVED • C ... ·. . ·y\)>~ AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO: Eric L. Komarniski and Kathleen A. Eskew 2621 Meadow Place N 111111111111110 20140508001420 Renton, WA 98056 FIRST AMERICAN UD 75 00 PAGE-001 OF 004 ' 05/08/2014 16:40 KING COUNTY, LIA . E2666883 -·------ 0s,0s,2014 1s:2s Filed for Record at Request of: First American Title Insurance Company K~:~ COUNTY, UA Sl 0 .00 SALE $410,000.00 PAGE-001 OF 001 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED File No: 4243-2237888 (BS) Grantor(s): Estate of Joan M. Jensen, deceased Grantee(s): Eric L. Komarniski and Kathleen A. Eskew Date: May 06, 2014 Abbreviated Legal: PTN SEC 5 TWP 23N RGE SE NE QTR NW QTR, KING COUNTY Additional Legal on page: Assessor's Tax Parcel No(s): 052305-9045-01 . ·-\HIS DOCUMENT SUPERCEDES.AND .REPJ.ACES SAID DOCUMENT RECORllED..1JNDER RECORDING NO. 20140507001089 ----.. THE GRANTOR(S) Linda Ann Jensen, Personal Representative for the estate of Joan M. Jensen, deceased for and in oonsideration of Ten Dollars and other Good and Valuable Consideration, in hand paid, oonveys, and warrants to Eric L Komamiski and Kathleen A, Eskew, husband and wife, the following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Real property in the County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF TRACT 30 OF ELDON ACRES, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOWME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 86, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE PRODUCTION OF THE NORTHERLY UNE OF SAID TRACT 30 TO THE CENTER UNE OF COWMBIA AND PUGET SOUND RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY AS SHOWN ON SAID PLAT; Page 1 of 3 LPB 10-05 APN: 052305-9045-01 Statutory Warranty Deed -aronued File No.: 4243-2237888 (BS) THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CENTER UNE 114.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WESTERLY PARALLEL WITH THE PRODUCTION OF THE NORTHERLY UNE OF SAID TRACT 30 TO THE WESTERLY UNE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY UNE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY 100.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY PARALLEL WITH THE PRODUCTION OF THE NORTHERLY UNE OF SAID TRACT 30 TO THE CENTER UNE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CENTER UNE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS TO AND FROM SAID PREMISES DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE SOUTHEASTERLY 20 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN SAID COUNTY; THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ON THE CENTER UNE OF COLUMBIA AND PUGET SOUND RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, AS SHOWN ON ELDON ACRES, ACCORDING TO VOWME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE'86; KING COUNTY, AT A POINT 114,00fEET SOUTHERLY, MEASURED ALONG SAID CENTER UNE, OF THE EASTl:RL Y PRODUCTION OF THE NORTHERLY UNE OF TRACT 30 OF SAID PLAT; THENCE WESTERLY PARALLEL WITH THE PRODUCTION OF THE NORTHERLY UNE OF SAID TRACT 30 TO THE WESTERLY UNE OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY UNE 200.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE EASTERLY PARALLEL WITH THE PRODUCTION OF THE NORTHERLY UNE OF SAID TRACT 30 TO THE CENTER UNE OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTER UNE TO THE NORTHERLY PRODUCTION OF THE EASTERLY UNE OF TRACT 20 OF SAID PLAT; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID PRODUCED UNE TO A POINT WHICH IS 25 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHERLY UNE OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE WESTERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTHERLY UNE TO THE NORTHWESTERLY UNE OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY UNE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Subject To: This conveyance is subject to covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements, if any, affecting title, which may appear in the public record, including those shown on any recorded plat or survey. Page 2 of3 LPB 10-05 APN:052305-9045-01 STATE OF Maine COUNlY OF ihYllbl-K Statutory Wananty Deed -continued )-ss ) Rle No.: 4243·2237888 (BS) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Linda Ann Jensen, is/are the person(s) who appeared before me, and said person(s) acknowledged that he/she/they signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she/they is/are authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Personal Representative of Estate of Joan M. Jensen, deceased to be the free and voluntary act of such party(ies) for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. I Dated: --'--/v__,__,/4"""~ -"?+-"! cf.i..:.U.!...!/ / __ _ J Notary Public in and for the Staj:e of Maine ·•· __ _ Residing at: &v tfavJ:llr,; Ma, K-l-11,,.MJJt.f. C 6 '< .. , My appointment expires: l4t1<-h j 11 '20 I ft -, Page 3 of3 LPB 10-05 -~ RECEIPT EG00035830 BILLING CONTACT Eric Komamiski 2621 Meadow Pl N Renton, WA 98056 REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME """•·~~• ----•m"~ LUA1S.000193 PLAN -Variance Technology Fee Printed On: March 25, 2015 Prepared By: Clark Close LUAlS-000193 000.000000.007.345.81.16.000 503.000000.004.322, 10.00,000 TRANSACTION TYPE Fee Payment $1,200.00 Fee Payment $36.00 of f Transaction Date: March 25, 2015 PAYMENT METHOD AMOUNT PAID Check#1708 $1,200.00 . •• Check#1708 $36.00 . SUBTOTAL $1,236.00 TOTAL $1,236.00 RECEIVED MAR 2 5 ; 1J i CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION Page 1 of 1