The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReport 1-''.J l y " 'J ) ' --.-. -------'it--. ,,.Anacortes Ave NEii /, ----··-----~ /:;., " cc· -- CAMPBELL SHOR1 PLAT TREE RETENT/ON.-V,NO Cl.FARING Pl.AN 1 -..w--""'-="""'"'"'"·-·M•.,., .......... ,,,,,_.,,, .,,~,,---,·~·"'"" ;:;;.~:.,. .. ,,.,~ ,, ... , .... ,. _ . .,...,."'-.--,.,., Cr.ion Aven":le Korthea::t -,,, .. - .. CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT BOUNOARY-TOPOGRAP/f/C SURVEY , ~~ ;I! ~~ ~ I ' I ' I ' I ' I ' I z ' '" I ~ " ~ 0 • -1 l ___ j __ _ ,~ i~ " ~ '~ ~p 2:8 -~ :z I<> ,· I "' Ii hi~ ii ' l i i I L; -.ad. i , • ' ;~ ~~ ,-,e. , .;, , ., ' ' ;,,'· , ' ~-t-·-* "· --~--- CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE CONTROL, G£NERAUZED UHL/TY. GRADING & TRANSPORTATION PLAN ,,;.>· m t! < "- '~ 0 z i ~ z i I ~ =i: " . -w . ~ ~ ~ r, ~. I • . ' I • t • " ; ~ is F l'i ~ "i ,l ~ " "' .; " !! I ,. ~ .. ~ s ii m ~ ::, "' ,. :; "' ~ ' /:~ ~ e g •" i i •' • "' < ~o Cc ' %: i ij~B ~j $ .. c "• ' co~!:'i ~J!t ffi ; ~tii'! i s~~1 g~ ~ §;~? ! &:-:-'I= :l:;:;55 f~ I ' ' I i ' I , ~ § ~ @ ~ • i , • i i ' • • ! ' I ~ ' ~o • ·! ,-ij ~~;u~ ~i~·~::--f .. s ·ss,, ,_:}i8~"' ;-~~~1,1~ ;o~t~Gi~ ~~~~~;~ ~ u 1,'r,!ll: -111..zo.,;:.ooN ~-Je $J SISVQ ( C ' Uv i I ' I ' ! ~ ;ii rn~ -I (!\ ! (\ I rn ' I] ' ' C ! r rn u ,.-, :a:, c' tj u !/- ~ ' ! . ' ' ' • ' I .! a I ! ' ; ' .. ! ' ~n ! R .. 1,!on1 ffiFf ·crc rr .) C z a !~ 0 \ /. / I // r s I / .r' r---_----. ----j-------;-/~/------~~---c ---- 1 I i I '/ I . 3 '-! \ // I C ' ' ' \ I .1 j \/ / / ~--'----"--s-·~-~- ' -~ I j .I I s. ,, ,, I J ,, J / '/ / / . I I / / / ') .......... \ . /,,_./ I L . .-·-.... ' ' ~-D:-:- ' :---- I '\ / -~$'' b(' ' ' \ § ' I-_-------- ' ' I ;\1:acorles i~ ve I\:: "!,> • _.;:,,-'~----c~~--'<X>----~ ------ '7/ !:'.i " L ________ _ .. _l_ ____________ J I .,, , • "-·. --''"" ,---:,-;: ~-i-----~---· -I i, .• ,, ·'_, r I ~ j ~ i I ~§ eo § / ,,--------- ~LANTINS PLAN CAMPBELL SHOl'tT PLAT RENTON, i'iA$HINiSTON ~--~~--- "! \".;2 § Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC AQA "''"''"'n<'~l~'""' , .. ,._...,. ·-· t J ~ i [1 I !I!! !! '! -~1 I . r, :,'~;' _,o,on, Dot. lly 1~• I~~~· ~,,_ "' l~ C z IJ (\ 0 < Ill "' 11 r )> z :::! z Cl t::'ETAIL.S 4 SPEGIFIGATIONS CAMFE>laLL SHO~T !"LAT RENTON, V'ILASHINcSTON "' '(\ ·o z -, !: z Ill "' i OJ IJ II ~ ;= ~ !l I" ' '! HI! I!' ,,,.,,.., ·! ' . ~ '~~ h~§~~~~~ ·'' !!; p t· ,, .,,,,!,i! 'OJ j! -~~ ~ ~ 0~ ~-~~~5·~ -·' i·a • ~ t ~, ~,.!·~ OJ I( ,, ' mi li 111!1!:j! ;, ' ~ ,, \ ii ' ··2 .. \ IJ _\ .---': ,.:', .. -, :!': r ~ Altmann OliYer Associates, LLC AQA ,., ..... , "' .... ~, ..... ""'''~'""'"''"'""·",_..,, .,,..,._.,.,, ....... & ::.:.:::.. I f l ~, I ' • a 8-~ "' ,I ~,·. ~ y -,~ '\"8 ,,_,,_,,< ~ i• '.- .si.;",.,,,,,, '. '..(/ a .-; ~.,, ,..::r,; :.·c "'I}; .. ~0 " "" 'v~ 0 . . . ., .,. .!-:.;:, 3N 3,w nw,oo .· .,,,.,_, .,.,, .. ,:,;:.':, 'L ~ "i';l! ~ ' -' ' -2.!.' -' J r , I . I i I I ' i I 1 I .1 J. I C _, r -r ' ' " • .. .. I\) 0 " En~,QHW~<l}S f::,, ---,., ... ,._,,_ ... ,,,,.~~=t'""·""'"',._,..,;,,., ..... , ,.,, .. ,.,._,.o,,._,..,..,,, . ..._~ ..... ,.,,., .. " ... ,. .. ,, I ' I' I i -;i-, ,. ;~=- i __ , ' CAAl'EELL SHORT PLAT MAILBOX PLAN / :·r ,; Anacortes Ave NE I n I p > t ii I ; ' ' ; 1 1 I ' • ! ~ i ! il ' • ; .. I <i / ·.·/ ,, / / / / .-...... /\ . ./ ./. ' . ./,,-":' . l ;.· m~ ii1hiC? I I I a 11pu l I I ! I !p ht,f L ·~ ' i ' II 111111 ' . ' "!'t"!"!'!! t ~ ~~~~~, ' i ... !jg lj ... i ' n 11 "" n Ul!I! n • .••• I !!!!!. ~ ! ~--... "\ ,- -" = :: .-LANTING t-J..AN :==:: GAMPS!LL SHOflitT FLAT ~!!l.. R!!NTON, ~INcSrTON ' ' r 0 ' • § ,--------- Anacortes A / ,,,----- ~/ ( col : ;:· I/ ~ · .. [/JI I, ~ ,...., I' l_ /l _______ _ I i ' ' I - ,\ltmann Oliver Associates. LLC AOA '""""'"'"'"~'''" £,-.wwmo-"'1 -· --~ , .. ~~,,>N ·-~ ~""·-~ "'~ ii~ -.,,_,'I~~ <IT 'M·mc, ' . 'VU\f I ~' I I "'"•~•.;USS\," J~.\lJQ UUllUll!V f,1nl~~I NO.L9NIHS"t'M 'NO.lN=:hl .1..,,, .. J.>IOI-IS ,,~ ... .,,~ ;NOIJ.1it::il111t::ia*-li t ;,iv.Laa -,,--..., ,._____,, "i5i;~ ,.,= "' -=1 ii· ~Ull J l f f : ii! l ,ill • , , ·, 1 11 1 ; l = rni f tu I i! 111 I ' •II I j ~ji i H tl t•i f t •i lt( . • lit11 i 1'.t I i. •t1 I I 1 I• 1if i f• fl! l l}i 1ftj t,l ! i 1 r u I ui 11 [ 1i ~u i !i! 11 h iu ' i JI !1 l ,,l d lit! l l,t l, •1 l(f f i, it u 1 !!li l I i 11 dn If llh 1H It h:t t { u Ii tt i flil ! 11! tr tntt lk ra, 1n 11, mi CD = "'' co <::, =o •i • '1H1 • nt' 1 · 11 1 ·• -r: 1 1: 1 lill I itt• i 1 ·i h !l;!lfll ttu!i H~: Jli f I !11f l }l ·1 1 iJ l~l it n i !11t .i ilm f 1 11 ti !Ii it ;ta HU1. 1 l l t 'II~ Ir ! I 1lt f it.11 ii 11 lr I ffl. diM l~I 1M 1!11[ ~ .. I[ ~ ~ [ , I ~h ~ IP ihil I! 1 I~ ii~ ii~~ t~~i, '"~ m!I ~ u fflt . 1 ~ 1, ! ~ ti' ~I ~i ~ ; 11;!J 1, u ~!11 ilh lh I h1f! ,m,1-11 1 thi 1 , 11 1i 1r ,. 1,11 m i, • . ji 1,· " 11 1 •• 11, r !fl! rhdu. llmil IHh.! ll ll ll I !1li i ii H r! , tit llli !Ii lh ,! !~i.l H!Ufi ,! U fi lili I h 1·11 r i 11 hiJ tt' it ' ,t l ii. i, h, 11 , 1 . . i nr !Ii 1i fiilt ii Hilt :ih i~ . 11 ~i ,i r1 i ill lb u1 11!! id l it l 1f 'i { d f ,! ,t [ l fiid H iJ! tr it I 'i t li l~ It' }I :pn ij Hill laff im l 11 }Jf ~ rH i ilt iW :n r·· I', I l !11 I I,~~ 11 ~ ffl m fi l~l! ii~! I~~ 1m I hi 11 !~ I~ ,ri ~~Ii Ii~, f 1•1! 3 1 tRIH d ill lf I till JI !lidi ii li1ll 1lHif itlr l llf l!i l!i rti Ht hb Jili 11n ii nm lih ! l ! ill If j!I ' bi 11,1111 1 11 . iJ~: . •· tl'I • r , «J;,7 i; >.{J. _, ~ ~ w ~. fu ((, ;': ::: . ,I 11,, .. , !,t , !' \ ,,li!hl1 lt j'I! ll ; li ~Ii 111!,!iilh !11.; '1!1·1 !!, I !!! !!! ! 11h11 ! , ll M I 1;! i II I I , 111!• I 111!11!1 11 1 h!~l1! I h I ~ !!ldli! I !! I ; ~ I.~\.\ ! ~JI ~ ~:t' i ~ ij\ !I '" ,, .f1 !I~ ; i, II ~ IHI !ill 111 i1) c: •" ~I C)i ~ ;1, !ll ! I'! . !, I (±) I (±) i~ (±) (±) ~ (±) • $ ~~ C±l C.B ... .. :;: j . " o 0 t ~ ;u '" () 0 ;u 0 Cl -" ui () '" ;u =< 2] () )> ,;, j~•tt ~i· §~ l~i ~~ • 0 I • ~ ! I' Ii ~:1 ~~~~~~;5:ri ~ . O:i ~ jil~' ""' -< ~ .. i~.~~ ~r ,, • • I~ ~· ~,:a• . l ' . ~~ xl ~~~~~ ~ i > 0 • •·! a 18 ~ I ?~ 2~ ~ ~6~ •• "' -<_ ;;izCzi i H ~l; ~i~i ..,1,1; ---' ;;$; "8!il :i ~ ca ,, 3!~gij ~ ~' ;;i2 ~i~~! ~ '" ! ~oo, ! I " ••,~,~ -I ! ~; ~:,~,,, £ ,; '!)1,1,1 ·i ,,,8, "• •• l,•?~·-1 ,dof•, ' i~ij"~i~ @ i r! ~ ~ ! ~ aJ~ z g~p~ 0 i ;HII lll !2 ti ~;~1~ ~ i ~ ' !· ,· ffi (I> .... . ' ' Rd.;~ ~ -a '"-3 i;: H!!~--< n r; ""< I ",s:a.~il,; I ' •!•:~ ?o .... 0 a i: '~ iii: > .. l _.:e ,;""~ =1 ~ e ~':·i"' ~ ! •!!f• !z::: ;I] O> ~ 13 .,. .. : "'-n;i: OU> b".l ~~ ~ ~f· l ti ~~ ·r· 0 '! i---~ II 0 0 > ! ::1 "U ! ,;: ;g ~! • 0 i;._ ::v< • i ,. i;; } i i" ' ' ' • ' I • ' '1 ' ' I i ii I~~ • i ~ " ! I ~ i ~ ::1 0 ,;: ~ tt l i : 5! I I -;;! I ' I I " I i (Ii z 9 0 • ' • ~ i ~· q m < ' i ! ~::J , ~n ~ ~ fi;O • " s 1113 " } ~ '? i1F ' Ill,) " -Vl ! ~ ~ iC/) E ~ ~ " • ~ ~ ~ e " ~ , " I § i I / ~I --s- , I 'I • I I I. .i- i. < 'L . . ~ ·_/.' .;:;. '.I' 'i' ·1 .1 l I J -1- 1- 1-. I I / / Union Avenue Northeasl -- •. ' I r / / / " -.::;,,,,.._~g'W 1---111·-\- --i ·1 I I i I I I I I I I I I I •' ~ ' -+-- / • ~· ,. /l!q "s ~-•' r .I ,, --- ~i ~~ 'I i ,: ·~ -< t ~i - 0 •• c~ ii~ :-, l ' 000 ' •o ffl • ,, ~~ ~ ' ~ ~ H ~ ~ ' ' ' ' ! ' F t ~ • ' ~ ' i~=§ I ~ • i i~'' ~ • 0 ~:s~ < il ~ ;~;, ~ ~ "'"'~"' 0 ~ ~i2~ 0 ; i ~;:~ ~ !;lz:;ii z> :--~ M-z:".i ;,1• ,, §~~ :~~ i'!i,.:.-i;:, 2,., ... I z p w "' ,, ~ " !o ~ " ~ S! .. '" ~ " $ • .. " !l ;; j ·-ill 1" ~ !'l ~ .. " " !" " "' \ \--- 1111, CAMPeELL SHORT PLAT ---...... _ .......... IO ·""'1!.:.-=::::,t"='°'""~'"" ... , .,.,..,,.,..,. . .., _ _.,..,.,, __ ,,o,w,><lJ•"""°"'"'""" TREE RETENTrON;lAHD Cl.EARING PLAN Encompass~ , ENGINEERING & SUtVEYING ~ August 9, 2016 Jan Illian Renton City Hall 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE: Campbell Short Plat Final Short Plat Submittal Review Version I I July 28, 2016 Dear Jan: The comments listed in your July 28, 2016 review were addressed as follows: Fire Review -Building Comments Contact: Corey Thomas I 425-430-7024 I cthomas@rentonwa.gov I. Fire hydrant not in service. Noted, the developer/contractor will work towards getting the fire hydrant put into service. 2. Provide 20 feet wide paved fire apparatus access roadway to the southernmost lot. A 20' wide joint driveway was provided to access the southernmost lot. Engineering Review Comments Contact: Ann Fowler 1425-430-73821 afowler@rentonwa.gov Provide as built drawings, bill of sale and cost data inventory forms. These were submitted for review prior to signature and notarizing. Verify ROW area as shown on the deed of dedication exhibit. The area shown does not appear to match the area shown on the construction plans. Verify ROW areas against the as built drawings. The dedication area matches the frontage improvements. This was adjusted during construction. Planning Review Comments -Contact: Clark Close I 425-430-72891 cclose@rentonwa.gov I. New private easement for ingress, egress & utilities maintenance agreement: Remove "unless pavement width is greater than 20 feet." Tract B would not allow parking based on the approved construction drawings. Removed. 2. Native Growth Protection Easement: Remove "provided however, that the owners of underlying property may install landscaping." Removed. 3. Call me for final landscape inspection. Noted-the developer/contractor will handle this. Technical Services Comments Contact: Amanda Askren 1425-430-73691 aaskren@rentonwa.gov Deed of Dedication: Please remove hatching in dedication area on Exhibit for recording. Removed. REETA form will be required as well for review. Noted-the developer/contractor will handle this. Western Washington Division 165 NE Juniper St., Ste 20 I, Issaquah. WA 98027 Phone: (425) 392-0250 Fax: (425) 391-3055 www.EncompassES.net Eastern Washington Division 108 East 2"' Street, Cle Elum, WA 98922 Phone: (509) 674-7433 Fax: (509) 674-7419 51'\h <. 0510 25 50 ---- SCALE 1" = 50' EXHIBIT B ' I \ I j I! " ~ -----_J "5' I ' I 411 NB 9th St lil S43°16'54"E 1.58' R=80.00' L=59.83' !1=42'51 '06" LOT B CITY OF RENTON LUA-03-098 REC. NO. 20040212900008 CITY OF RENTON DEDICTION AREA R=S00.00' L=70.72' 6=8'06'12" N00°08'08"W 22.45' T.P.0.8. En.s;.9._rp~~s ~ ---IOI~! IL>rli><< SIC<<t. 'Sol• JO•. ,,,.,.,.h, WA'WJT' • l'hotl< 1411) )91./:ll'SO•""• (•Ill J~I.JOll ---1[1! El<I )!'Id SI:"" •0< \.lum, 1W, ~9ll•Phor><c (lt'.191674.74\J • '" (\Cl:J) 674-741~ Short Plat Map: Text masking needs to be revised on both sheets. Some areas the masking is taking away some of the linework necessary and in other areas masking is needed to help eliminate text over linework. Done. Sheet 2: In Lot 11 there is some language about a power easement that seems out of place. Done-- removed. Sheet 2: Found rebar on east property line state 0.1 'W, but graphically it looks like it is East of the line. Fixed. Please confirm.If you have questions or need additional information, please call me at 425-392-0250 or email me at tredding@encompasses.net Sincerely, Encompass Engineering Tom Redding Y \Jobs (J)\15115517 Pacific Peak Construct1on\DOCS\Letters\Jan lllian.docx ADVISORY NOTES TO APP' '"ANT LUA 15-000239 -------Renton® Application Date: April 10, 2015 Name: Campbell Short Plat Site Address: ENG -Final Short Plat Submittal Review Version 1 I July 28, 2016 Fire Review -Building Comments Contact: Corey Thomas I 425-430-7024 I cthomas@rentonwa.gov 1. Fire hydrant not in service. 2. Provide 20 feet wide oaved fire annaratus access roadwav to the southern most lot. Engineering Review Comments Contact: Ann Fowler I 425-430-73821 afowler@rentonwa.gov Provide as built drawings, bill of sale and cost data inventory forms. Verify ROW area as shown on the deed of dedication exhibit. The area shown does not appear to match the area shown on the construction plans. Verifv ROW areas anainst the as built drawinns. Planning Review Comments Contact: Clark Close I 425-430-72891 cclose@rentonwa.gov 1. New private easement for ingress, egress & utilities maintenance agreement: Remove "unless pavement width is greater than 20 feet." Tract B would not allow parking based on the approved construction drawings. 2. Native Growth Protection Easement: Remove "provided however, that the owners of underlying property may install landscaping." 3. Call me for final landscane insnection. Technical Services Comments Contact: Amanda Askren I 425-430-7369 I aaskren@rentonwa.gov Deed of Dedication: Please remove hatching in dedication area on Exhibit for recording. REETA torn, will be required as well for review. Short Plat Map: Text masking needs to be revised on both sheets. Some areas the masking is taking away some of the linework necessary and in other areas masking is needed to help eliminate text over linework. Sheet 2: In Lot 11 there is some language about a power easement that seems out of place. Sheet 2: Found rebar on east orooertv line state 0.1 'W, but araohicallv it looks like it is East of the line. Please confirn,. Ran: July 28, 2016 Page 1 of 1 DEPARTMENT OF car UNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SHPL REC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS SHORT PLAT RECORDING Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 (press #4) Fax: 425-430-7231 JUL. 0 8 2015 PURPOSE: To ensure the proposed land division is in accordance with City of Renton's adopted standards and consistent with the approved Short Plat. In addition, final review is used to verify compliance with any required conditions. COMPLETE APPLICATION REQUIRED: In order to accept your application, each of the numbered items must be submitted at the same time. If you have received a prior written waiver of a submittal item(s), please provide the waiver form in lieu of any submittal item not provided. All plans and attachments must be folded to a size not exceeding SY, by 11 inches. APPLICATION SCREENING: Applicants are encouraged to bring in one copy of the application package for informal review by staff, prior to making the requested number of copies, colored drawings, or photo reductions. Please allow approximately 45 minutes for application screening. , • ~ 5ubmr\.e\~c.n ic:..~I ea{: qll Subm rHei \S APPLICATION SUBMITIAL HOURS: Applications should be submitted to Planning Division staff at the 6th floor counter of Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, between 8:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. Monday through Friday. Please call your assigned project manager to schedule an appointment or call (425) 430-7200 extension 4 to reach the Planning Division. Due to the screening time required, applications delivered by messenger cannot be accepted. All Plans and Attachments must be folded 8 Yz"by 11" APPLICATION MATERIALS: LC\ II) fJb:::I I 5f'U1tP\ei{ LU A l'S-00(8 3c1 al-1. ff2. Public Works Approval: Please provide confirmation that required improvements have either been substantially installed or deferred. Waiver Form: If you received a waiver form, please provide 4 copies of this form. Density Worksheet: Please submit 4 copies of a completed density worksheet. 1 H :\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Hel p Ha ndouts\Plan ning\sh plrec.doc Rev: 02/2015 ~5. ~ 6. s--s. • Confirmation of Compliance with all Conditions of Plat Approval; Please provide 4 copies of a statement detailing how all conditions of plat approval have been addressed. Plat Certificate or Title Report: Please provid~ copies of a current Plat Certificate or Title Report obtained from a title company documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances of the involved parcel(s). The Title Report should include all parcels being developed, but no parcels that are not part of the development. If the Plat Certificate or Title Report references any tecorded documents (i.e. easements, dedications, covenants) 4 copies of the referenced recorded document(s) must also be provided. All easements referenced in the Plat Certificate must be located, identified by type and recording number, and dimensioned on the Site Plan. Draft Legal Documents; Please provide 4 copies of any proposed street dedications, restrictive covenants, draft Homeowners Association, or any other legal documents pertaining to the development and use of the property. 8:15e'-ff\QJ'l+? '-I Post Office Approval: Please provide'2..,_copies of the Post Office confirmation that they approved your mailbox location(s). Contact Bill Sansaver of the Post Office at {425) 255-6389 or 1-800-275-8777 Additional Requirements for Plats with Private Utility and Access Easements: Short Plats with parcels requiring access via a private easement shall show the locations and widths of these proposed utility and access easements. The following two notes shall be inclu_ded upon the face of the short plat; • Declaration of Covenant; The owner of land embraced within this short plat, in return for the benefits to accrue from this subdivision, by signing hereon covenants and agrees to convey the beneficial interest in the new easements shown on this short plat to any and all future purchasers of the lots, or of any subdivision thereof. The covenant shall run with the land as shown on this short plat. • Private Access and Utilities Maintenance Agreement: New private exclusive easement for ingress and egress is to be created upon the sale of lots shown on this short plot. The owners of lots shall have an equal and undivided interest in the ownership and responsibility for maintenance of the private access easement appurtenances. These appurtenances and maintenance responsibilities include the repair and maintenance of the private access road, drainage pipes, and storm water quality and/or detention facilities within this easement, private signage, and other infrastructure not owned by the City of Renton or other utility providers. Maintenance costs shall be shared equally. Parking on the paving in the access easement is prohibited, unless pavement width is greater than 20 feet. (NOTE: If only one lot is subject to the agreement, contact the Public Works Department at 425-430-7235 for special language.) 2 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\shplrec.doc Rev:02/201S ~9. D 10. ~11. Deed of Righ.--f-Way Dedication: If any public right-'lay is required for your project, please providej'copies of a draft deed of right-of-way dedication. '{ Aquifer Protection Notice: For Short Plats within either of the Aquifer Protection Zones, the following notice must be included upon the face of the short plat: The lots created herein fall within Zone {1 or 2} of Renton's Aquifer Protection Area and are subject to the requirements of the City of Renton Ordinance #4367. This City's sole source of drinking water is supplied from a shallow aquifer under the City surface. There is no natural barrier between the water table and ground surface. Extreme care should be exercised when handling of any liquid substance, ather than water, to protect from contact with the ground surface. ft is the homeowners' responsibility to pratect the City's drinking water. Short Plat Plan for Recording: Please provide 4 copies of a fully-dimensioned plan prepared by a State of Washington registered professional land surveyor, drawn at a scale of 1" = 40' on an 18" x 24" plan sheet (or other size or scale approved by the Planning Division) and including the following information: • Name of the proposed plat • In the upper right hand corner include the City land use file number (e.g. LUA02-037) and below in smaller font, the city LND number provided by the Property Services section (e.g. LND ) • Name and address of the licensed land surveyor/engineer • Legal description of the property to be subdivided • Date, graphic scale, and north arrow oriented to the top of the paper/plan sheet • Location and dimensions of all property lines including the square footages of each lot • Location of the subject site with respect to. the nearest street intersections (including driveways and/or intersections opposite the subject property), alleys and other rights of way • Names, locations, types, widths and other dimensions of existing and proposed streets alleys, easements, parks, open spaces and reservations • Data sufficient to readily determine and reproduce on the ground the location, bearing, and length of every street, easement line, lot line, and boundary line on site. Dimensions shall be to the nearest one-hundredth (1/100) of a foot, angle, bearing, degree, minute and second. All measurements and bearings shall be mathematically correct • Coordinates shall be included per City of Renton surveying standards for permanent control monuments • Location and dimensions of all easements referenced in the plat certificate with the recording number and type of easement (e.g. access, sewer, etc.) indicated • Location and dimensions of any existing structures to remain within or abutting the plat • Location of critical areas and any required buffer on or adjacent to the site 3 H : \CED \Data \Forms-Te m plates \Se 11-H e Ip Handouts \Pian n i ng\sh pl rec. doc Rev:02/2015 ~13. [f/14. identifi ,y type (e.g. floodplain, Category 1 We .. and, Class 3 Stream) Certifications: • Certification by a licensed land surveyor that a survey has been made and that monuments and stakes will be set • Only if the plat will not be served by sewer: Certification by the King County Department of Health that the proposed septic system(s) is acceptable to serve the plat • Certification of City approval to be signed by the Public Works Administrator • Certification of approval to be signed by King County Assessor and the Deputy King County Assessor • Signatures of all property owners showing on the title report (signatures must be notarized with an ink stamp-not embossed) 4- Calculations: Please provide%copies of complete field calculations and computations noted for the plat and details (if any) of all distances, angles, and calculations together with information on the error of closure. The error of closure on any traverse shall not exceed 1' in 10,000'. Tree Retention/ Land Clearing (Tree Inventory) Plan: Please provide 4 copies of a fully dimensioned plan drawn by a certified arborist or a licensed landscape architect if ANY trees or vegetation are to be removed or altered. The plan shall be based on finished grade, drawn at the same scale as the project site plan with the northern property line at the top of the paper, and clearly show the following: • All property boundaries and adjacent streets, location and dimensions of rights-of-way, utility lines, fire hydrants, street lighting, and easements; • Location of all areas proposed to be cleared; • Location, species, and sizes of trees on or immediately abutting the site. This requirement applies only to trees with a caliper of at least six inches (6"), or an alder or cottonwood tree with a caliper of at least eight inches (8"), when measured at fifty-four inches (54") above grade; • Clearly identify trees to be retained and to be removed; • Future building sites and drip lines of any trees which will overhang/ overlap a construction line. Where the drip line of a tree overlaps an area where construction activities will occur, this shall be indicated on the plan; • Show critical areas and buffers. Arborist Report: Please provide 4 copies of an arborist report by a certified arborist or a licensed landscape architect that correlates with the Tree Retention/ Land Clearing Plan and addresses the following: • Identification scheme used for each tree (e.g. tree number); • Species and size of each tree (caliper measured at 54 inches above grade); • Reason(s) for any tree removal (e.g. poor health, high risk of failure due to·structure, defects, unavoidable isolation (high blow down potential), unsuitability of species, etc.) and for which no reasonable alternative 4 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\shplrec.doc Rev: 02/2015 ~5. 1'L 20. ~21. ac .. on is possible (pruning, cabling, etc.); • For trees proposed to be retained, a complete description of each tree' s health, condition, and viability; • For trees proposed to be retained, a description of the method(s)used to determine the limits of disturbance (e.g., critical root zone, root plate diameter, or a case-by-case basis description for individual trees); • A description of the impact of necessary tree removal to the remaining trees, including those in a grove or on abutting properties; • The suggested location and species of supplemental trees to be used when required. The report shall include planting and maintenance specifications; • An analysis of retained trees according to Priority of Tree Retention Requirements specified in RMC 4-4-130H.l.b. 4 Landscape Plan, Detailed: Please providell,_ copies of a Landscaping Plan (Detailed) meeting the requirements of RMC 4-8-120D. Irrigation Sprinkler Plan: Please provide 3 copies of an Irrigation Plan meeting the requirements of RMC 4-8-120D. 4 Wetland Mitigation Plan: {Only for projects with wetlands). Please provide ~copies of a Final Mitigation Plan meeting the requirements of RMC 4-8-120D. Stream and Lake Mitigation Plan: (Only for projects with streams/lakes). Please provide 3 copies of a plan meeting the requirements of RMC 4-8-120D. Monument Cards: When a monument(s) is installed as part of the project, please provide 2 copies of a form obtained from the City Technical Services Division and filled out by a surveyor providing information regarding a single monument, including the Section, Township and Range, method of location, type of mark found or set, manner of re-establishment of the single monument (if applicable), description, and a drawing showing the location of a single monument and indicating a reference point to that monument. Proof of Improvement Deferral or Installation: Please provide 3 copies of the Improvement Deferral Form located in the Customer Service Center on the G'h Floor of Renton City Hall. Any deferrals of improvements must be approved by the Department of Community and Economic Development Planning Division Director prior to the recording of the short plat. Plan Reductions: Please provide one 8 Y." x 11" legible reduction of each full size plan sheet (unless waived by your City project manager). The sheets that are always needed in reduced form are: landscape plans, conceptual utility plans, site plan or plat plan, neighborhood detail map, topography map, tree cutting/land clearing plan, critical areas plans, grading plan, and building elevations. These reductions are used to prepare public notice posters and to provide the public with information 5 H :\CED\Data\Forms-T em plates\Self-Help Handouts\Plan ning\sh pl rec.doc Rev:02/2015 about the proj __ . The quality of these reductions must ue good enough so that a photocopy of the reduced plan sheet is also legible. The reduced plans are typically sent in PDF format to the print shop and then are printed on opaque white mylar- type paper (aka rhino cover) to ensure legibility. If your reduced plans are not legible once photocopied, you will need to increase the font size or try a different paper type. Illegible reductions cannot be accepted. Please also be sure the reduced Neighborhood Detail Map is legible and will display enough cross streets to easily identify the project location when cropped to fit in a 4" by 6" public notice space. Once the reductions have been made, please also make one 8 Yi'' x 11" regular photocopy of each photographic reduction sheet. Some of the local Renton print shops that should be able to provide you with reductions of your plans are Alliance Printing (425) 793-5474, Apperson Print Resources (425) 251-1850, and PIP Printing (425) 226-9656. Nearby print shops are Digital Reprographics (425) 882- 2600 in Bellevue, Lithe Design (206) 574-3000 and Reprographics NW/Ford Graphics (206) 624-2040. All Plans and Attachments must be folded to 8Yz'' by 11" REVIEW PROCESS: Once the final short plat information is submitted to the Planning Division, the materials will be routed to those City departments having an interest in the application. Reviewers have approximately two weeks to return their comments to the Planning Division. All comments and any requests for revisions will be sent to the applicant. Once all comments have been addressed, the applicant re-submits the revised plans and/or documents for review. As part of the review process, the Planning Division will ensure improvements have been installed and approved and that all conditions of the short plat approval have been met. Once the applicant has demonstrated these items have been addressed through either a confirmation of improvement installation approval or letter of deferral, the City will send a written request for the final mylar, courier fees and any associated legal documents. Once all of the City's required approval signatures have been obtained, the City will transmit the mylar via courier to King County for recording. The entire recording process takes approximately eight weeks to complete. However, the time frame for getting a short plat recorded is largely dependent upon application completeness and prompt turnaround time for revisions. Lots cannot legally be sold until the Short Plat has received its recording number. DEFERRAL OF IMPROVEMENTS: If a developer wishes to defer certain on-site or off-site improvements (i.e. landscaping, curbs and sidewalks), written application with full and complete engineering drawings must be submitted to the Planning Division. The application should explain the reasons why such delay is necessary. If approval is granted, security in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, set-aside fund, assignment of funds, certified check or other type of security acceptable to the City shall be furnished to the City in an amount equal to a minimum of 150% of the estimated cost of the required improvements. 6 H:\CED\Data\Forms·Templates\Self·Help Handouts\Planning\shplrec.doc Rev: 02/2015 DEDICATION OF RIGHT OF 11v .. v: If right-of-way dedication is requir or the short plat, separate application for City approval is required. The associated deed of right-of-way dedication must be approved prior to recording of the short plat. This process may take six weeks, so early application is encouraged. 7 H :\CED\Data \Forms-T emplates\Self-Help H andouts\P lann ing\shpl rec.doc Rev:02/2015 ' ...... - ' 7 • DEPARTMENT OF COMMUl\.i1TY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT --------Renton 0 WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 I www.rentonwa.gov LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITIAL REQUIREMENTS: WAIVED MODIFIED BY: BY: Arborist Report 4 Biological Assessment 4 Calculations 1 Colored Maps for Display 4 Construction Mitigation Description, AND• Deed of Right-of-Way Dedication 1 Density Worksheet 4 Drainage Control Plan, Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Architectural 3 AND • Environmental Checklist 4 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy) 1AND4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) , AND• Flood Hazard Data, Floor Plans, AND• Geotechnical Report >AND, Grading Elevations & Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Elevations & Plan, Detailed, Habitat Data Report 4 Improvement Deferral 2 Irrigation Plan 4 ,, ... -- JUL O 8 2016 COMMENTS: PROJECT NAME: Cc, n)f):kl I ,0 t:K'.r + Re Q' DATE, re /a()/ 1 b I uH is--oooa39 ' 1 H :\CE D\Data \Forms-Templates\Self -Help Ha ndouts\Plan ning\ Wa iversubmittalreqs. docx Rev:08/2015 ' LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITIAL REQUIREMENTS: WAIVED MODIFIED BY: BY: COMMENTS: King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 Landscape Plan, Conceptual• Landscape Plan, Detailed 4 Legal Description 4 Letter of Understanding of Geological Risk 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 Master Application Form 4 ') ' , Monument Cards (one per monument) 1 Neighborhood Detail Map 4 Overall Plat Plan 4 Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 Post Office Approval 2 Plat Name Reservation 4 Plat Plan, Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 Public Works Approval Letter, Rehabilitation Plan 4 Screening Detail 4 Shoreline Tracking Worksheet 4 Site Plan ,,No, Stream or Lake Study, Standard 4 Stream or Lake Study, Supplemental 4 Stream or Lake Mitigation Plan 4 CA+---c---- Street Profiles 2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 1AN0, Topography Map, Traffic Study 2 Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4 Urban Design Regulations Analysis 4 Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final 4 ~ Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4 2 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Waiversubmittalreqs.docx Rev:08/2015 I ' - LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Wetlands Report/Delineation 4 Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites lANDJ Lease Agreement, Draft 2ANDJ Map of Existing Site Conditions 2ANDJ Map of View Area 2AND3 Photosimulations, AND, This Requirement may be waived by: l. Property Services 2 Development Engineering Plan Review 3 Building 4 Planning WAIVED MODIFIED BY: BY: 3 H :\CED\Data \Forms-T em plates\Self-He Ip Handouts\Plan ning\ Wa iversu bm itta lreqs. docx COMMENTS: Rev:08/2015 .• ' Statement Of How Conditions Have Been Addressed: The Campbell Short Plat, File No. LUA15-000239, ECF, SHPL-A is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall create and record a Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) for the area contained within the wetland and associated buffers over Critical Area Tract A prior to or concurrent with short plat recording. Each owner of lots 1 and 2 shall have a fractional interest in the Critical Areas Tract in order to protect the Tract in perpetuity. Response: Note on page 1 of final short plat map. 2. The applicant shall be required to revise and resubmit the Landscape Plan to show a minimum of 10 feet of on-site landscaping on Lot I along the public street frontage and two trees in the front yard of Lot 2. The plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to the issuance of the construction permit for on-site utilities. Response: Done. 3. The applicant shall provide a shared driveway approach to Tract B that shall be no closer than five feet (5') to the east property line in order to retain enough room for the driveway approach apron, road maintenance, a privacy fence, and onsite landscape screening. The additional area on the east side of the shared driveway, between the east property line and the edge of the pavement, should not impact the 2-lot short plats ability to maintain compliance with Renton Municipal Code. Response: Tract B reqnirements have been met. Privacy fence has been installed. 4. The applicant shall install a wood split-rail fence with wetland signage along the edge of Tract A. The wood split-rail fence shall include the proposed group of trees to be retained at the northwest comer of the property. Such a split-rail fence shall be constructed prior to the recording of the short plat. A requirement to maintain the fence by a Homeowners' Association or similar entity shall be placed on the face of the short plat. Response: The split rail fence has been installed. A note on page 1 of the final short plat for maintenance has been added. 5. The applicant shall provide access to each lot from the proposed shared driveway (Tract B). A note to this effect shall be placed on the face of the short plat prior to recording. Response: A note has been added to page 1 of the final short plat map. 6. The applicant shall locate the existing luminaire pole at comer of Anacortes Ave NE and NE 9th St to be within the proposed 8-foot-wide planter strip at corner of Anacortes Ave NE and NE 9th St. Response: Pole has been relocated. ' 7. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Evaluation prepared by Geospectrum Consultants, Inc. dated March 11, 2015 ( or an updated report submitted at a later date) during site and building construction. Response: The completed infrastructure construction conforms to the geotech recommendations. Future home construction will conform to recommendations as well. 8. The applicant shall be required to submit, to the Plan Reviewer for review and approval, a revised final drainage report and associated plans, based on the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (as amended by the City of Renton) prior to construction permit approval. Response: Plans were approved by the City and drainage was constructed per the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual. I Print Form Reset Form DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DENSITY WORKSHEET Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 I l'J' O 8 2016 ,J l l- L Gross area of property 83,428 square feet ------ 2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include: Public Streets* 2,619 square feet Private access easements• 2,067 square feet Critical Areas•• 52,000 square feet Total excluded area: 56,686 square feet 3. Subtract line 2 (total excluded area} from line 1 for net area 26,742 square feet 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage 0.6139 acres 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned 2 units/lots 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density 3.2578 = dwelling units/acre *Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. • *Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands, or floodwoys." Critical Areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. 1 Y:\Jobs (J)\15\15517 Pacific Peak Construction\DOCS\Preliminary SP\Oensity Worksheet.pdf Rev:02/2015 Return Address: City Clerk· s Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 DEED OF DEDICATION Project File#: LUA! 5-00239, SHPL-A " 1·_1 }\ ! t, L " Property Ta\'. Parcel Number: I 02305-9095 Street Address: SW Comer of intersection of NE 9th Reference Nwnber'(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page __ . Grantor(s): Grantee(s): I. I. Citv of Renton, a Municioal Corooration The Grantor, as named above, for or and in consideration of hereby grants to the above named Grantee, the following described property: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PORTION OF LOT B, CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LUA-03-098 AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20040212900008, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASIITNGTON. The Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s) as named above, the above described real estate situated in the CoW1ty of King, State of Washington IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Seal the day and year as written below. Aonroved and Accented Bv: Grantor(s): Grantee(s): City of Renton Mayor, Denis Law City Clerk, Bonnie Walt on l 5 517 Deedofiledication Page 1 of4 ' Notary Seal must be within box Notary Seal must be within box 15517 DeedoIDedication [NDH 1DUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHlNGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print), _____________ _ My appointment expires: ____________ _ Dated: CORPORATE FOR!d OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STAIB OF WASHlNGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) On this ___ day of _____ , 20 ~ before me personally appeared ______________________ to me known to be of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notary Public in and for the State ofWashington Notary (Print) ______________ _ My appointment expires: ____________ _ Dated: Page 2 of 4 Exhibit A Legal Description Project: LUA15-000239, SI-IPL-A WO# PID GRANTOR: Street: NE 9th Street THAT PORTION OF LOT B, CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LUA-03-098AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20040212900008, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT B; THENCE NORTH 88°24'56" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT B, A DISTANCE OF 124.58 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 43'16'54" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1.58 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 80.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 42'51'06", A DISTANCE OF 59.83 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A COMPOUND CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTH, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 500.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8'06'12", A DISTANCE OF 70.72 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT B; THENCE NORTH 00°08'08" WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 22.45 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PORTION CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 2,519 SQUARE FEET. 15 :517 DeedofDedication Page3of4 l,-7. !d' 0 510 25 50 ---- SCALE 1" = 50' EXHIBIT B I I I JI \"-_____ _J a· I J I 411 . HB9t.b8t . ~ S43'16'54"E 1.58' R=B0.00' L=59.83' l\=42'51 '06" LOT B CITY OF RENTON LUA-03-098 REC. NO. 20040212900008 R=500.00' L=70.72' l\=8'06'12" N00'08'08"W 22.45' T.P.O.B. ··-----------_l_ _ _j CITY OF RENTON DEDICTION AREA E.n.,.2111,.p~s f:::,, --'lf<"'!:Nt"' 165NEtc,,/ps,,St•cct. ~clOI •l«>"'-"h. WA9l!027,l'l-,;,r;:: l<:l!lJ9]-mlD•'" (•l\\ )O".J[I<., IC6£o,t.,..; 51,ect ,a, rlom, ~~:e':~.::'P•-70J, '" [1('9\ 67•-><•9 Real Forest Contracting (206) 255-9893 arboristsNW, LLc \NW w_ arbor i stsn w. corn P.O. Box 909 Mercer Island, WA 98040 (206) 779-2579 I have personally inspected the trees located at the Campbell subdivision south of the corner of NE 9 and &Anacortes, Renton WA, King count parcel number 1023059095 as you requested. A International Society of Arboriculture level 1 limited visual method was used. The map supplied with the proposed new homes general locations was used to aid in determining any possible impact on the trees- A count was made of the trees 6" DBH "Diameter at Breast Height" and larger in the area outside of the wetland designated piece of the parcel. The total was 135, with Red Alder representing the majority in the 60% range with wild Cherry next, Cottonwood, Douglas fir, Hazelnut, Pacific willow and a row of Bamboo (this species growing on the Northside of the parcel having grown from under the neighboring property). Black berry vines dominate the understory to a depth of 30' along the street frontage into the parcel. Several of the trees are stump sprouted from some earlier cutting bordering the neighboring property on that north side. Of the spec(es on site all but the Douglas fir could be termed young trees with the firs being in the 30-40 year old range the remainder in the 10-15 year old range. Overcrowding would be my opinion on the whole site with again the Douglas fir being above the competition for light The overcrowding aside the trees on site appear to be in good health. The largest stand of Douglas fir is in the far south east corner of the parcel. To address any possible conflict between the trees and the proposed homes there are Douglas firs that look to need their root systems prot~cted. If I have the location of the homes correct 2 Douglas firs north of the bu.ilding site closest to the street and one larger fir along the fence line east of the second home, the bilcj( building site will be affected_ It is this second fir that appears to be the closest to the new home. There <Ire smaller trees also to be affected but as they are the Red Alder and they so numerous I h;we not addressed them here_ Neal~ .. · ~bo~,N1'$!i'Jt !SA Cert PN107SA 15ATree Risk Assessment Qualified ~JSA Cl'lfA#8G7 .. ~A~&$0Q\ "f ' " •. • Mapcheck 1: LOT 1 Closure Summary Precision, 1 part in: Error distance: Error direction: Area: Square area: Perimeter: Point of Beginning Easting: Northing: Side 1: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 2: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 3: Curve Curve direction: Radius: Arc length: Delta angle: Tangent: Chord direction: Chord angle: Deflection angle: Chord distance: Easting: Northing: Side 4: Curve Curve direction: Radius: Arc length: Delta angle: Tangent: Chord direction: Chord angle: Deflection angle: Chord distance: Easting: Northing: Side 5: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT LOT CLOSURES 85902.210' 0.008' N86° 39' 18.80"E 13396.09 Sq. Ft. 13396.089 714.120' 1312404.8943' 184318.8987" 588° 24· 56.00"E [-88°24'56"] [91°35'04"] 151.460' 1312556. 2964 ° 184314.7108" 543° 16' 54.00"E [-134°51'58"] (45°08"02'"] 1.580' 1312557. 3796' 184313. 5606' Counter-clockwise 80.000° 59.830' 42°51'06" (31. 393'] [564° 42' 27.00"E] [158°34'27"] [-21°25"33"] [58.447'] 1312610.2242' 184288.5895' Counter-clockwise (500.000'] 45.690' 5°14'07" [22.861'] [588° 45' 03.50"EJ [177°22'56"] [-2°37'04"] (45.674'] 1312655 .8874' 184287.5939' 50° 08' 08.00"E [-88°46 ·01"] [91°13'59"] 23.240' Page 1 Easting: Northing: Side 6: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 7: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 8: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 9: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 10: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 11: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 12: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 13: Line Direction: Angle: CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT LOT CLOSURES 1312655. 9424. 184264.3540" 514° 36. 48.00'"E [165°31"20"'] [-14°28°40"'] 20.000' 1312660. 9883 • 184245.0010" S0° 08" 08.00"'E [-165°31'20"'] [14°28'40"] 51.610' 1312661.1104 • 184193.3911" N88° 22' 33.00"W [-ss 0 14·25"J (91°45'35"] 71.120' 1312590. 0190' 184195.4069' N22° 55• 54.00"W [-114°33"21"] [65°26'39"'] 11.110· 1312585 .4564' 184206.1914' N12° 47' 22.00"W (-169°51'28"] (10°08'32"] 65.850' 1312570,8792' 184270.4077' N67° 50' 44.00"'W (124°56'38"] [-55°03'22"] 68.560' 1312507,3810' 184296.2620' 561 ° 56' 28.00"W [129°47'12"'] [-50°12'48"] 70.430' 1312445.2290' 184263.1332' 589° 52' 58.00"'W [-152°03'30"'] Page 2 Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 14: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Mapcheck 2: LOT 2 Closure Summary Precision, 1 part in: Error distance: Error direction: Area: Square area: Perimeter: Point of Beginning Easting: Northing: Side 1: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 2: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 3: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 4: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 5: Line Direction: Angle: CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT LOT CLOSURES (27°56'30"] 9.120' 1312436 .1090' 184263.1146' N29° 13' 23.00"W [-119°06'21"] [60°53'39"] 63.920' 1312404. 9026' 184318.8992' 47330.788' 0.008' N66° 06' 41.63"E 7911.35 Sq. Ft. 7911. 352 376.820' 1312590.0117' 184195 .4105' 588° 22' 33.00"E (-88°22'33"] (91°37'27"] 91.130' 1312681.1051' 184192.8275' 50° 08' 08.00"E [-91°45'35"] [88°14'25"] 100.370' 1312681. 3426' 184092.4578' N88° 22' 33.00"W [ -88°14. 25"] (91°45'35"] 80.390' 1312600.9849' 184094.7363' N7° 33' 04.00"E (-84°04'23"] [95°55'37"] 57.420' 1312608. 5305' 184151.6584' N22° 55' 54.00"W [149°31'02"] Page 3 Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Mapcheck 3: TRACT A Closure Summary Precision, 1 part in: Error distance: Error direction: Area: Square area: Perimeter: Point of Beginning Easting: Northing: Side 1: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 2: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 3: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 4: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 5: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 6: Line Direction: Angle: CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT LOT CLOSURES [-30°28'58"] 47,510' 1312590.0190' 184195.4137' 164909. 686' 0.006' 571° 22' 33.26"E 57434.40 Sq. Ft. 57434.404 1020.010· 1312299.2886' 184321. 8196' 588° 24' 56.00"E [-88°24'56"] [91°35'04"] 105.650' 1312404. 8982' 184318.8983' 529° 13' 23.00"E [-120°48'27"] (59°11'33"] 63.920' 1312436 .1046' 184263 .1137' N89° 52' 58.00"E [119°06'21"] [-60°53'39"] 9.120' 1312445.2246' 184263 .1324' N61° 56' 28.00"E [152°03'30"] [-27°56' 30"] 70.430' 1312507.3766' 184296.2612' 567° 50' 44.00"E [-129°47'12"] [50°12'48"] 68.560' 1312570.8749' 184270.4069' S12° 47' 22.00"E [-124°56'38"] Page 4 Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 7: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 8: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 9: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 10: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Mapcheck 4: TRACT B Closure Summary Precision, 1 part in: Error distance: Error direction: Area: Square area: Perimeter: Point of Beginning Easting: Northing: Side 1: Curve Curve direction: Radius: Arc length: Delta angle: Tangent: Chord direction: Chord angle: Deflection angle: Chord distance: CAMPBELL SHORT [55°03'22"] 65.850' 1312585.4520' 184206.1906' s22° 55' 54.00"E [169°51'28"] [-10°08'32"] 59.220' 1312608.5261' 184151.6507' 57° 33' 04.00"W [-149°31'02"] [30°28.S8"J 57.420' 1312600. 9805' 184094.7287' N88° 22· 33.00"W [-95°55'37"] [84°04'23"] 301.290' 1312299. 8115' 184103.2682' N0° 08' 08.00"W [-91°45'35"] [88°14'25"] 218.550' 1312299. 2944' 184321.8176' 60154.541' 0.004' N5° 37' 07.45"W 2066. 96 Sq. Ft. 2066.957 235.880' 1312655.8787" 184287.5958' Counter-clockwise [500.000'] 25.030' 2°52·05" 12.520' N87° 11' 50.90"E [-92°48'09"] [87°11'51"] [25.027'] PLAT LOT CLOSURES Page 5 Easting: Northing: Side 2: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 3: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 4: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 5: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 6: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Mapcheck 5: DEDICATION Closure Summary Precision, 1 part in: Error distance: Error direction: Area: Square area: Perimeter: Point of Beginning Easting: Northing: Side 1: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: CAMPBELL SHORT 1312680.8761" 184288.8195' 50° 08" 08.00'"E [-85°53"56"] [94°06 ·04··1 95.990" 1312681.1032' 184192.8298' N88° 22' 33.00'"W [-88°14'25'"] [91°45'35'"] 20.010· 1312661.1013' 184193.3969' N0° 08' 08.00"W (-91°45'35'"] [88°14'25'"] 51.610' 1312660. 9792' 184245.0068' N14° 36' 48.00"W [165°31'20'"] [-14°28'40"] 20.000· 1312655.9333' 184264.3598' N0° 08' 08.00'"W [-165°31'20'"] [14°28'40"] 23.240' 1312655. 8783' 184287.5997' 82766 .296' 0.003' N64° 06' 12.56"E 2619 .46 Sq. Ft. 2619.457 279.160' 1312680.8227' 184311.2669' N88° 24' 56.00"W [91°35'04"] [-88°24'56'"] 124. 580' PLAT LOT CLOSURES Page 6 Easting: Northing: Side 2: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 3: Curve Curve direction: Radius: Arc length: Delta angle: Tangent: Chord direction: Chord angle: Deflection angle: Chord distance: Easting: Northing: Side 4: Curve Curve direction: Radius: Arc length: Del ta angle: Tangent: Chord direction: Chord angle: Deflection angle: Chord distance: Easting: Northing: Side 5: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Mapcheck 6: TOTAL PARCEL Closure Summary Precision, 1 part in: Error distance: Error direction: Area: Square area: Perimeter: Point of Beginning Easting: Northing: Side 1: Line Direction: CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT LOT CLOSURES 1312556.2903' 184314.7116' S43° 16' 54.00"E [45°08'02"] [-134°51' 58"] 1.580' 1312557. 373 5' 184313. 5613' Counter-clockwise 80,000' 59.830' 42°51'06" [ 31. 393'] (S64° 42' 27.00"E] (158°34'27"] (-21°25'33"] (58.447'] 1312610. 2181' 184288.5903' Counter-clockwise (500.000'] 70.720' 8°06'12" [35,419'] (N89° 48' 54.00"E] (175°56'54"] [-4°03'06"] [70.661'] 1312680.8788' 184288.8184' N0° 08' 08.00"W (94°06'04"] [ -85°53 · 56"] 22.450' 1312680.8257' 184311.2684' 231669.529' 0.005' N22° 22' 12.18"W 83427.70 Sq. Ft. 83427.701 1200.730' 1312299.2886' 184321. 8196' S88° 24· 56.00"E Page 7 Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 2: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 3: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: Side 4: Line Direction: Angle: Deflection angle: Distance: Easting: Northing: CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT LOT CLOSURES [-88°24'56"] (91 °35 '04"] 381.680' 1312680. 8227' 184311. 2660' 50° 08' 08.00"E (-91°43'12"] [88°16'48"] 218.810' 1312681. 3403' 184092.4567' N88° 22' 33.00"W [-88°14'25"] (91°45'35"] 381.690' 1312299.8037' 184103.2750' N0° 08' 08.00"W (-91°45'35"] [88°14'25"] 218.550' 1312299.2866' 184321. 8244' Page 8 SUBDIVISION Issued By: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY by its agent: IJ TICOR TITLE COMPANY Guarantee/Certificate Number: 70020273 THIRD CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, herein called the Company, GUARANTEES J'Ul O r 2'H.:: ' -1) j !,.: Encompass Engineering and Surveying herein called the Assured, against actual loss not exceeding the liability amount stated in Schedule A which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS 1. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the identity of any party named or referred to in Schedule A or with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. 2. The Company's liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability amount set forth in Schedule A. Please note carefully the liability exclusions and limitations and the specific assurances afforded by this guarantee. If you wish additional liability, or assurances other than as contained herein, please contact the Company for further information as to the availability and cost. Ticor Title Company 701 5th Ave., Ste. 2560 Seattle, WA 98104 Countersigned By: Authorized Officer or Agent Sutd1v1s1on Guarantee/Certificate Page 1 Chicago Title Insurance Company By: Attest: President Secretary Pnnted: 07.01.16@02:14PM WA-TT-Po/VNT-02840.660004-SPS-1-16-70020273 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 70020273 THIRD Liability $1.000.00 ISSUING OFFICE: Titie Officer: Donna Roetter Ticor Tiffe Company 701 5th Ave .. Ste. 2560 Seattle. WA 98104 Phone: 253-796-6583 Fax: 877-521-9938 Main Phone: (425)255-7575 Email: Donna.Roetterfn'ITicorTitle.com SCHEDULE A Premium $250.00 Effective Date: June 21. 2016 at 12:00 AM The assurances referred to on the face page are: Tax $23.75 That. according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matter relative to the following described property: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF Titje to said real property is vested in: River Road Investments, LLC. a Washington limited liability company subject to the matters shown below under Exceptions, which Exceptions are not necessarily shown in the order of their priority. END OF SCHEDULE A Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page 2 Printed: 07.01.16@02:14 PM WA-TT-FWNT-02840. 660004-SPS-1-16-70020273 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description Lot B, City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-03-098 as reocrded under recording number 20040212900008, records of King County, Washington. Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page3 Printed: 0701.16@02:14PM WA-TT-FWNT-02840. 660004-SPS-1-16-70020273 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE 8 GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 70020273 THIRD 1. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2016 Tax Account No.: 102305-9095 Levy Code: 2100 Assessed Value-Land: $208,500.00 Assessed Value-Improvements: $0.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: Paid: Unpaid: Affects: $2,767.64 $1,383.82 $1,383.82 Tax able portion of said premises 2. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1 , second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2016 Tax Account No.: 102305-9095-94 Levy Code: 2100 Assessed Value-Land: $0.00 Assessed Value-Improvements: $0.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: $0.00 Paid: $0.00 Unpaid: $0.00 Affects: Exempt portion of said premises 3. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: In favor of: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: Puget Sound Power & Light Company Electric transmission and/or distribution line September 12, 1940 3120992 Portion of said premises 4. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: In favor of: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: Sutx:livision Guarantee/Certificate Puget Sound Power & Light Company Electric transmission and/or distribution line Augusts, 1950 4043986 Portion of said premises Page4 Printed: 0701.16@02·14PM WA-TT-FWNT-02840.660004-SPS-1-16-70020273 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 70020273 THIRD SCHEDULE B (continued) 5. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: In favor of: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: Puget Sound Power & Light Company Electric transmission and/or distribution line June 24, 1980 8006240435 Portion of said premises 6. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: In favor of: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: City of Renton Public utilities September 2, 1981 8109020545 Portion of said premises Said instrument appears to contain errors in the description of said easements. 7. City of Renton Ordinance number 4612 establishing an assessment district for sanitary sewer service facilities and the terms and conditions thereof: Recording Date: June 21, 1996 Recording No.: 9606210966 8. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, recitals, reservations, easements, easement provisions, dedications, building setback lines, notes, statements, and other matters, if any, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth on Renton LLA number LLA-03-098: Recording No: 20040212900008 9. Any rights, interests, or claims which may exist or arise by reason of the following matters disclosed by survey, Recording Date: Recording No.: Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate May 8, 1979 7905089006 Page5 Printed: 07.01.16 @02:14 PM WA-TT-FWNT-02840.660004-SPS-1-16-70020273 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 70020273 THIRD SCHEDULE B (continued) 10. The Company will require the following documents for review prior to the issuance of any title insurance predicated upon a conveyance or encumbrance from the entity named below. Limited Liability Company: River Road Investments, LLC, a Washington limited liability company a. A copy of its operating agreement, if any, and any and all amendments, supplements and/or modifications thereto, certified by the appropriate manager or member. b. If a domestic Limited Liability Company, a copy of its Articles of Organization and all amendment thereto with the appropriate filing stamps. c. If the Limited Liability Company is member-managed a full and complete current list of members certified by the appropriate manager or member. d. If the Limited Liability Company was formed in a foreign jurisdiction, evidence, satisfactory to the Company that it was validly formed, is in good standing and authorized to do business in the state of origin. e. If less than all members, or managers, as appropriate, will be executing the closing documents, furnish evidence of the authority of those signing. The Company reserves the right to add additional items or make further requirements after review of the requested documentation. 11. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Puget Sound Energy, Inc. Utility systems for purpose of transmission, distribution and sale of gas and electricity. January 7, 2016 20160107000446 Note: The Public Records indicate that the address of the improvement located on said Land is as follows: vacant land Note: The Company finds no matters against the name(s) of River Road Investments, LLC in the Public Records which would appear as exceptions in the policy. END OF SCHEDULE B Subjivision Guarantee/Certificate Page6 Printed: 07.01.16@02:14 PM WA-TT-FWNT-02840.660004-SPS-1-16-70020273 SUBDIVISION Issued By: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY by its agent: ~ TICOR TITLE COMPANY Guarantee/Certificate Number· 70020273 SECOND CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, herein called the Company, GUARANTEES Encompass Engineering and Surveying herein called the Assured, against actual loss not exceeding the liability amount stated in Schedule A which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS 1. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the identity of any party named or referred to in Schedule A or with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. 2. The Company's liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability amount set forth in Schedule A. Please note carefully the liability exclusions and limitations and the specific assurances afforded by this guarantee. If you wish additional liability, or assurances other than as contained herein, please contact the Company for further information as to the availability and cost. Ticor Title Company 701 5th Ave., Ste. 2560 Seattle, WA98104 Countersigned By: Authorized Officer or Agent Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page 1 Chicago Title Insurance Company By: Attest: President Secretary Printed: 01.28.16@ 02:05 PM WA-TT-FWNT-02840.660004-SPS-1-16-70020273 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY GUARAN, ,:;E/CERTIFICATE NO. 70020273 SECOND Liability $1,000.00 ISSUING OFFICE: Title Officer: Donna Roe\ter Ticor Title Company 701 5th Ave., Ste. 2560 Seatlle, WA 98104 Phone: 253-796-6583 Fax: 877-521-9938 Main Phone: (425)255-7575 Email: Donna.RoetlerlnlTicorTitle.com SCHEDULE A Premium $250.00 Effective Date: January 22, 2016 at 12:00 AM The assurances referred to on the face page are: Tax $23.75 That, according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matter relative to the following described property: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATIACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF Title to said real property is vested in: River Road Investments, LLC, a Washington limited liability company subject to the matters shown below under Exceptions, which Exceptions are not necessarily shown in the order of their priority. END OF SCHEDULE A Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page2 Printed: 01 .28.16@ 02:06 PM WA-TT-FWNT -02840.660004-SPS-1-16-70020273 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description Lot B, City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-03-098 as reocrded under recording number 20040212900008, records of King County, Washington. Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page 3 Printed: 01.28.16@02:06PM WA-TT-FWNT-02840.660004-SPS-1-16-70020273 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY GUARAN. _...:/CERTIFICATE NO. 70020273 SECOND SCHEDULE B 1. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2015 Tax Account No.: 102305-9095-03 Levy Code: 2100 Assessed Value-Land: $6,200.00 Assessed Value-Improvements: $0.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: Paid: Unpaid: Affects: $91.18 $91.18 $0.00 Taxable portion of said premises Property taxes, which are a lien not yet due and payable, including any assessments collected with taxes to be levied for the fiscal year 2016. 2. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2015 Tax Account No.: 102305-9095-94 Levy Code: 2100 Assessed Value-Land: $0.00 Assessed Value-Improvements: $0.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: $0.00 Paid: $0.00 Unpaid: $0.00 Affects: Exempt portion of said premises 3. This item intentionally deleted 4. This item intentionally deleted 5. This item intentionally deleted 6. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: In favor of: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Puget Sound Power & Light Company Electric transmission and/or distribution line September 12, 1940 3120992 Portion of said premises Page4 Printed: 01.28.16@ 02:06 PM WA-TT-FWNT -02840.660004-SPS-1-16-70020273 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY GUARAN. _..JCERTIFICATE NO. 70020273 SECOND SCHEDULE B (continued) 7. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: In favor of: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: Puget Sound Power & Light Company Electric transmission and/or distribution line August 8, 1950 4043986 Portion of said premises 8. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: In favor of: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: Puget Sound Power & Light Company Electric transmission and/or distribution line June 24, 1980 8006240435 Portion of said premises 9. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: In favor of: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: City of Renton Public utilities September 2, 1981 8109020545 Portion of said premises Said instrument appears to contain errors in the description of said easements. 10. City of Renton Ordinance number 4612 establishing an assessment district for sanitary sewer service facilities and the terms and conditions thereof: Recording Date: Recording No.: June 21, 1996 9606210966 11. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, recitals, reservations, easements, easement provisions, dedications, building setback lines, notes, statements, and other matters, if any, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth on Renton LLA number LLA-03-098: Recording No: 20040212900008 12. Any rights, interests, or claims which may exist or arise by reason of the following matters disclosed by survey, Recording Date: Recording No.: Subdivision Guarantee/Certlflcate May 8, 1979 7905089006 Page 5 Printed: 01.28.16@02:06 PM WA-TT-FWNT -02840 .660004-SPS-1-16-70020273 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY GUARAN. __ /CERTIFICATE NO. 70020273 SECOND SCHEDULE B (continued) 13. The Company will require the following documents for review prior to the issuance of any title insurance predicated upon a conveyance or encumbrance from the entity named below. Limited Liability Company: River Road Investments, LLC, a Washington limited liability company a. A copy of its operating agreement, if any, and any and all amendments, supplements and/or modifications thereto, certified by the appropriate manager or member. b. If a domestic Limited Liability Company, a copy of its Articles of Organization and all amendment thereto with the appropriate filing stamps. c. If the Limited Liability Company is member-managed a full and complete current list of members certified by the appropriate manager or member. d. If the Limited Liability Company was formed in a foreign jurisdiction, evidence, satisfactory to the Company that it was validly formed, is in good standing and authorized to do business in the state of origin. e. If less than all members, or managers, as appropriate, will be executing the closing documents, furnish evidence of the authority of those signing. The Company reserves the right to add additional items or make further requirements after review of the requested documentation. 14. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Puget Sound Energy, Inc. Utility systems for purpose of transmission, distribution and sale of gas and electricity. January 7, 2016 20160107000446 Note: The Public Records indicate that the address of the improvement located on said Land is as follows: vacant land Note: The Company finds no matters against the name(s) of River Road Investments, LLC in the Public Records which would appear as exceptions in the policy. END OF SCHEDULE B Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page6 Printed: 01.28.16@02:06 PM WA-TI-FWNT-02840.660004-SPS-1-16-70020273 SUBDIVISION Issued By: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY by its agent: ffiJ TICOR TITLE COMPANY Guarantee/Certificate Number: 70020273 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, herein called the Company, GUARANTEES Encompass Engineering and Surveying herein called the Assured, against actual loss not exceeding the liability amount stated in Schedule A which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS 1. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the identity of any party named or referred to in Schedule A or with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. 2. The Company's liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability amount set forth in Schedule A. Please note carefully the liability exclusions and limitations and the specific assurances afforded by this guarantee. If you wish additional liability, or assurances other than as contained herein, please contact the Company for further information as to the availability and cost. Ticor Title Company 701 5th Ave., Ste. 2560 Seattle, WA 98104 Countersigned By: . I(. /,Ir.· J,t:°...;,. / Authorized Officer or Agent Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page 1 Chicago Title Insurance Company By: Attest: President Secretary Printed: 03.25.15@ 09:47 AM WA-TT-FWNT-02840.660004-SPS-1-15-70020273 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 70020273 Liability $1,000.00 ISSUING OFFICE: Title Officer: Donna Roetter Ticor Title Company 701 5th Ave .. Ste. 2560 Seattle. WA 98104 Phone: 253-796-6583 Fax: 425-255-0285 Main Phone: (425)255-7575 Email: Donna.RoetterfmTicorTitfe.com SCHEDULE A Premium $250.00 Effective Date: March 18, 2015 at 12:00 AM The assurances referred to on the face page are: Tax $23.75 That, according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matter relative to the following described property: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF Title to said real property is vested in: Fred Alberts and Donna Alberts, husband and wife ,. subject to the matters shown below under Exceptions, which Exceptions are not necessarily shown in the order of their priority. END OF SCHEDULE A Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page 2 Printed: 03.25.15@ 09:48 AM WA-TT-FWNT-02840. 660004-SPS-1-15-70020273 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description Lot B, City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-03-098 as reocrded under recording number 20040212900008, records of King County, Washington. Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page3 Printed: 03.25.15 @ 09;48 AM WA-IT-FWNT-02840.660004-SPS-1-15-70020273 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 70020273 SCHEDULE B 1. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2015 Tax Account No.: 102305-9095-03 Levy Code: 2100 Assessed Value-Land: $6,200.00 Assessed Value-Improvements: $0.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: Paid: Unpaid: Affects: $91.18 $91.18 $0.00 Taxable portion of said premises 2. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2015 Tax Account No.: 102305-9095-94 Levy Code: 2100 Assessed Value-Land: $0.00 Assessed Value-Improvements: $0.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: $0.00 Paid: $0.00 Unpaid: $0.00 Affects: Exempt portion of said premises 3. The Land is presently classified as exempt and may be subject to the collection of back taxes for a possible three to ten year period, depending upon the actual use classification of the property during its exempt status. Inquiry should be made to the King County Assessor's Office or the Company for additional information. Tax Account No.: Levy Code: 102305-9095 2100 4. A contract of sale by and between the parties named below Dated: November 11, 1975 Vendor: Fred Alberts and Donna Alberts, his wife Vendee: First Church of the Nazarene, Renton, Washington Recording Date: November 18, 1975 Recording No.: 7511180394 · Excise Tax Receipt No.: E327998 Said contract has been partially fulfilled as to the west 550 feet of Lot A adjoining, by Statutory Warranty Deed recorded under recording number 7611220691. ,/ Affects: Said premises and other lands Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page4 Printed: 03.25.15@ 09:48 AM WA-TI -FWNT-02840.660004-SPS-1-15-70020273 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B (continued) 5. Statement of fact and the terms and conditions thereof: Recording Date: Recording No.: October 28, 2014 20141028000556 ,/ GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 70020273 6. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: In favor of: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: Puget Sound Power & Light Company Electric transmission and/or distribution line September 1,2; 1940 3120992 V; Portion of said premises 7. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: In favor of: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: Puget Sound Power & Light Company Electric transmission and/or distribution line August 8, 19.50 4043986 / Portion of said premises 8. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: In favor of: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: Puget Sound Power & Light Company Electric transmission and/or distribution line June 24, 1980/ 8006240435 f Portion of said premises 9. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: In favor of: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: City of Renton Public utilities September 2, HJ.81 8109020545 / Portion of said premises Said instrument appears to contain errors in the description of said easements. 10. City of Renton Ordinance number 4612 establishing an assessment district for sanitary sewer service facilities and the terms and conditions thereof: Recording Date: Recording No.: Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate June 21, 1996 / 9606210966 Pages Printed: 03.25.15 @ 09:48 AM WA-TT-FWNT-02840.660004-SPS-1-1 S.70020273 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B (continued) GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 70020273 11. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, recitals, reservations, easements, easement provisions, dedications, building setback lines, notes, statements, and other matters, if any, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth on Renton LLA number LLA-03-098: Recording No: 20040212900008-/ 12. Any rights, interests, or claims which may exist or arise by reason of the following matters disclosed by survey, Recording Date: Recording No.: May 8, 1979 7905089006 V Note: The Public Records indicate that the address of the improvement located on said Land is as follows: vacant land END OF SCHEDULE B Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page 6 Printed: 03.25.15 @ 09:48 AM WA-TI-FWNT -02840.660004-SPS-1-15-70020273 geoAdvantage: King Cou , of Washington State (App3) Page 1 of 1 ~7 \ \ [_J I "'o~ .. . ' ... \ 1i : ' .. ., z ,. \\ • > .. l'v"~ .. .. C ':. ·• .. ' . • . ' • _..,--" ,· ' M~~C:.ION .. ··--·-· .,. NE 9th Pl .. -,.,,... • V> ... / . .. ~-.. .. . l-lE:tTHS~ ... ., NE 9th S Nt: 9Tr" ST . . . ' ~Q I .. ' ·, . • >· .-,.:,' ~• . ' . ' ~ _.,.-. . ,• ' . .~.. ' . : \ " . -··-. ·-" . . . - '" • .. " ' ,• -· .;~ '<, f-,l ,~ . . '<--'<, " </' .. • ,w 00 . ~ :z " " ·a-~ ' •• '> '"' ' -~ ,: ' ,. = '0 .. ,~ ;· 4j ,,;' : ii -• C l 'ij " ~ ii ·'!) «; ... I E 8th s . . ... .,. .... , ....... ----. I '\ I I I • I IJ Sentry Dynamics, Inc. and its TICOR TITLE COMPANY customers make no representations, Ad t warranties or conditions, express or geo van age implied, as to the accuracy or . completeness of information ww.sentrydynamtCS.net contained in this report. http://geo.sentrydynamics.net/WA_king/default.aspx 3/24/2015 • "' ... 0 .. 0 .:~' c, , 1iU£HCf IID •• • IO 44 -CII -~-.. CCUNTY, WASH. fflfb for Recoril at .Ritlleol:11 i;, .. 1,.;..J Let H/l>,~1" -·-- r,.bJt fo,-1J:1, ,rv .. S (:_ __ ,Jl,.,._1c,,.. w .... h .. 2.i!J·S- Statutory Wanmaty DNd g ' I / I ,. •• La• THF. GR!i~TOR JIMIU WO'ISI APa.S'ffl, t'orat1'l1 Jallll LOIJ'ISI CWLIS •ad lAllS LARSSBlll APILSffl, bu bHNlld ,t~ OCtOMr ll, 1961 for and In cr,ruictefatitm of Twn Dolbra ($10.00) and otbar .... •• YduJl.1• condder•tion lhe folio.I~ ~ribtd rnl nc.z"· situ.tied in tb!-Cm1111y nl \\".wlinfon· • Slate or 'l'bll Nortb om ... iu.1r al tba Soatlt -. ...... it of tM Soattn.at Quarter ot. ffort._.t Qurte:r of S.ct:l.aa. 10, Tawftabip 25 lrortb., Rance , 1.w.N., LESS tM w.,t 3D fMt tiler.of for r•d parpo••· Tbia dNd i• 1!.wn i11 ta.lfiU•a.t of tUt eerta:la. rwal ••tat.e cattrut batwen Jl'll1'D LOIJISI COl:LIS, • W14aiw •llld .na;.· 4Llll:T8 nd JXal ALID'lS, baahaad •nd wile, ~Ud t• 7tlt dlly cl OatONr, 1961, and coedUt-d lor tM conftynt• of t'IMt ai.cn. dHctdbl:d prop1rt:r, ud the co-uni. of ...n-aatr Mr.in c•teiM• IIUl l not apply t:o any titla, intanet or aacabranea ari•iDf l>y, tarallp or uder the purcba•r in Hid C!antrHt, lad 111•11 ii.t 1pply to a, tm•, •na•-nts 01" otM-r i!!hllrp, -le,..iad, .... ,ad or ba~iq. dw ... 1t .. ..._11t to tba datil al. Nid ccatraC!t. Subject. "to all ••••ntl. NiatrictiOUi ndl ni•rntima of record, if an,. ,,. dayof .._..r. 1951. JIJll1I LCIIJI:Y APILSl'N nd LAIS tAUS• APII.SITR V Description: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1973.823.398 Page: l 0£ l Order: br Comment: 1+-i'-ll/J'7C u-13 .... . REAL ESTATE CONTRACT lltn .. ,. loveinber FRED ALBERTS and OODA. AIJIER'I'S, his 111fe FIRST CHURCH OF THE li\ZAREIIE, Renton, Washi.DJton. ...,i., ~ Qle "pla,du,,tt.n WIT'NESSETB:: 1'llat tM-.tin acz-1o .a. tg lM ~ -.I 1k _....... ,ip-. 1,g purU&N f,-tk .u.r '~'" ......_ -.W ial .... ti:, allll tlle 1pp,.i~ ill 1CIJfG c .... ,, S'9tl: 9' W---: PAB::EL A: llortti 100 feet 01· .llortb. nalr or south b.alf' of .01.1.thwest ,;.l.6fl.rt.er of the lorth',jest quarter loca~ in Section 10, to..-ns.n1p 23 IIO.rtb, Range 5 East, ·,1. M., in King Coun-ey, •ashin4t.On: Except portion lyine; •itb..in lj2'nd Ave. S. .. E. p&rcel I: North halt or south half of sou.+·h11eat 'i.118.rter or "IOrthwest quart.er of Sectio~ 10, l'ovnshlp 23 llort.b.1 ztaage 5 Ea.st., W. M., ill IU.lJ8 Coimty, Wasbi.ngton: £xcept. the Borth 100 feet tllereof and excep_t tbe so1.1th 110 feet thereof, ud except portion lying within 132nd ;a.ve. s. £. y.J' n..-ud~ .... ot lkl.,;CDlltn,l;l;u.: uf...a.:r.-.; n.~pna, ii 3E.VEMY 'IBJOSA.ID AID ~/ 100 ---• ----.. -• -.,. ci; 70 OOC .00 • -l Di6n. If -"'* '!W&ftf '!IOUSA.llD ilD Ill/lOC ---------------{f 20,.000.00 l o..n,._ ... put, ~ ra,npt 'lrillnvf • ....,. ~ MIii Pili ---., aid. p,adllN: fllMR .. lie _.. ....... : TE5 !llOUSAllD AJll SJ/100 ----{$10,000.00) dollars or. or beton tbe 15th day or •1 111'6, and 'ml 1BlU3AllD AID ~/100 ----($.lo,coo.oo) dollars on or before the l5tb day or lloveaber 1W6, and ·.;.lie balanc:e o.f &aid purenase price &ball be paid 11.s follows! '1'VO lltDiillED S!V"Effl !ICE'l' ElQd 12/100 ------($278.12 ) dollars or core at purchaser's option, DD. or before ttie 15th day or Dece:aber 19 76 and 'NO BtJIDDD SP!'fEftY EICll'r am 12/100 ---------(.$278.12 ) dcll.ar6_. or .i,ore at purchaeer'a opt1on, on or before the 15th day of each GIICC:eed.ing -.::alendi:tr month until the balance of said purebase pri(!'~ shall ban been fully pale.. l'b.e i)urcba.ser fQrtbl!qrees to pe.y intere1;1t on ta.e 41.aiDishlng balance or the ~::iinl:i.g tJ'J,OOJ.CXat the rate of 7 1/2 per eerat per 'lml-. froa the 15th aay of loveiaber 1971:., 'ol'bLcb interest sb.P" · ·,e deducted from each 1.nstal..l..en~ p.3~t am. the bal.ulce of each payment applied ~w cedact.ioa Qf prh.eipal. Seller agrees to deed relee6e t.O oa.ri:h'.lser the ·,test. 440 feet 01· ':.11e property on or b:?fore ... t. Purchaser's opt.ion June· 3, 1976. --r -,;>:;, I f1,t' /:;'). ,\I 1111-,._at:I IO t. mad< ~ ~~>JI be .... .t ' L.·.. ~),, •• iac\ otDlf i,iKI! :u tbs• :a-,-dncta ~ c.3:.!7<~10-"'"') Mn'.mtdtGmtaolCDUll'1,-4ataeoldolille"sb&ilk ffovemter 15, 1175 ~,. _ ....,~-_, (IJ ~ ;iurdwll" .-s ad &lftlS !41 pq before dduq-,, LIi tuft.~ ~u tllPt -., .a, ~""" ~ =--~ :::r:.c~~~ ~b,u~~t~~~ ~'::= l~l<~V ~-~='.:~ ~~/ •l mate, tbt ~· ~ lO p,1,y tM -bd!ffll ~ e1 -··--· .Otouhr (1) 7be-puldlua apn. u.Alil tllc ~ price i, fallr paid. ((I ml) the bowldl.oQ IIDW -.:I~~-...... -r:.r,nw(, inlllml tClo 1.1a &all&J. cu.II value-~ ~ "-as ~---b~ bot.b 6n: >.Ad lrirubloria iA .. ~y • . IJljr: ~ ud f 1bie lt'tltr", bcd1, ~. tt.u ..,,~~ _,. 1~ • ..!Id r.o pay 1n p,:r,rr,.iu-~for u,d r.o deli...., an •.......W. tn , .. .,,., • 3· Tl'I' p~rd1ucr ;lCJtt> WI full impn:1i~m of >&id rat ffiU< ~ .... bun ,,..d<: and tl't>.l nciLI,~, th~ s,<tlcr nor hn U!l i TI 1:11' ~rld :o ony <;o;,n,.an; rnpea,ag .!Ir (onditioQ of ,..,y im:,n,vtffl<Cc:, !bcrroo. <>Ur ,ball \he pu:rdiurr Of s,<lltr Of ~ u.ii<al of ritll..-be, lltld 10 1n1 ,o, .....,t <>r • .,.__..1 ior •lt~Uo1", Ullpro,-.111nt1• or ~II ulllf-!s Ult ,-,,~t o, 1c-tDflll "'~ oo ;. contain«! b~fnl! or >1 in ..-riti,,1 ~ .II~ lo :,od mldtc I put of tb!. ,~=:!ac! ''J TI-<fc purt!:uor .._..u_es ,.:i bia.'"<h of~ t,. or de>lcucL,oo of ,o,· impr,>~•mnn_,. no• 011 ,aad real ntat<c ur lanc:dltr pb.r«I SMr<on. and o( :~~ :.lt:n~ oi ,.,Jd =I "'!-< .. 1M or :u,y part tbefffi :or ~!ii., UM:. 101 ~,...., l!\al no ,u<h da.,nac-. dntn><:tion or Ulill!c , .. ,n <<>n\.lil:,I• i fai:~,.. of ,n,idttmon In ""-.. '""~ port oi "'id ,02) """"'I• ,~ ~ hr p,;h~, u~. ti>• p,,-n.on ~• th• e,mdnnt\.alion ••ard rrm.a1"11!1~ ~::rr \ll>}.,,..,,.l oi rn'°nablo, upm-~i p1o;;ur,:,111h~ J.":rw: ;.iuJ: ~ p.iid 10 tM ><i1•r 1rd al)!lbtt. >< i,.c\·m,-nl ""l"'° purch1w P<H"< hertrn uni.,~ :hr 1rfler t~t~ 10 •&>• thr purchuer In 1pplf 111 or, p0r1io11 n! ,.,,1, u,~ru,l"'n l<ol"li '.O 1~r 1Tbuilcill-!! or ll'<!~rJ- l•~r. o! 1nc· 1mp,,J1·emen1s d•m,;:e,J h u,h :...lir.~ [n c:i.sc ..,; 1~=~• nr dt,·n.rti11n fr,,;n l ;wr:/ ,n~~rc,I .atain,l, lhe !>l',:,(fl"rl~ r,f ,urh ;:.-;~~:~'.~".'_""· ~=.::::; ,~'. ~:·~\.~'_,:: '~~-:~' ;:,;,~~/ !~t~~~-~~c~·,~• ;;::)t::~i j~:,,,·(~~t\:'• h~'::1~:'°~o;• ,;~:·:~:; ·:·io •::~~ ::-., ,., ·,c -.. ,., .;,.,-.·, , ,,., • .,,. • :,;, .. ,. ~.·:oco ·,ci,-,~ .,....,._ ,.-__ .. .,.,,~, .•• ,,, ....... , ... , ....,.. .. , ~-, ~-. w, I , ;,r , ·ca.n,, I",:; · e ·:am,·.c •, •:,.,, ~ •,/ .;e!t• • .~ ..-.:,_. e>""!.-.J n, ,,h., :h.1~ ,~, ',,"',.·~cc: Pr,•.:,1 ,<MrAi n,c.•· ,.·. ,~;,r,·.·,: .r. c,,_j :.;:.c .. ~m- '·· '"' :L,·, ·.•,r.· • ;...·,~•,-..: ;"'Ii" oi '"'' -,·.,ar.« tn :Ce o~:•0,><r •, ·h• ,,r': ,~,,.~,,, ·,! ,:I•(~ c: ,,,.,: -·.,a:•" "i \t.e '•·· •;! ·io""II o:>d Mr:"n": n, !.c ,, ·· ,~c·: . ..,-·,,-,e• ... ~ '·' · ··: '.e--.;c, ,t ,~,, on,·•« :)le~,.,, .. ,;,, l< :o ,,.., r•1 n:·,c: ~, ,~nt,..,, •~~-, -~s,::.!r "'·'"" p~.-~u,.,, ,a:~ ,,-,.1 ,...,~:• ~~~ a, •. 1>~rtoue M ·thrf qt,J,n"~" .. ~.;·• C,· ~~-= ·~ "", c-• .-,.,~,,~ ,:.~.: ·-.,,...,. j~'-:,, ,· ....... Description: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1975.1118.394 Page: 1 of Order: br Comment: _ _L (6) U ~ tlli, to m4 real .w. 11-•b,ect WI a ...a.s -.,.. -.<:1,a. ....,. -'itll. ldtr ii puRAliarJ IIMI -t $ate, or U1 ....... GI' atliu o.loliptia, 'IRllld, ..... It, to PJY, lbllr lilP"W to -.Ila llkil pay-,. &I ~ .,jth Ult lffm& ~J, Uld .. ~ .... ,..... ...... tkrilM. tD ..__,~~to -ft l!lo-dlialllt, .did....., PIY_.b .. aadi, ollall 1Jitalll!ml14U.~.mfallat; ... .dw .... llM-. (7) lle .... qa-.vpca ..... W ~ of tlw, ~prim: .IIIIIIJa&a.l la ti. 9Ulllffabow llpldW, 10 a-., ud Mftrto~a llal!1!!!!_~ hl:"11:?. '.e:-.t «cd to -.id re.I ~Le, actr,t111i:: u• pa.1111-trwl knaflfl tllla, for 1'111*-. hw of~ lllOlpt uy tlil1 iay &Uaclr, .ttu dak of do""¥ ~lldi uy pmc,n otffl:r i';m lbt wltr, pd Hii)NI to dlr f ....... -. Fred ·..-~ Alberts aad. Doana Alberta to-im...ra•t1io~ s._...1111 ...... --.:1~~-............... ~- tbey ---·-· th~~ f_ ..... ....,.act .. ~-1,,,j--·~II'""~ dlenia........... " lltl> ...a..,.01 ~er 1975 _,,1:,;~:,:~~~~ ,1'i~ l'r,bl,c .. -,1,l /ff taf.StGk ol . :;·.::., . .Y·'.,·' ,· ..a,q •---~'.f.~~L---·-·. *-ll. TO: lbrtbwP.st Mortpge & RBcrov or J(enton 35 So. Gr>..dy iia.y JleutoD, 'Asbtngton 98055 18 ,;4 8 . " ------------OL • Description: Kiog,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1975.1118.394 Page: 2 of 2 Order: br Comment: . ' '"' .J; l:' I ,. , .. J!l I 11 ' ~ I ill: I I ·., I ! er:; < ! to I Fl~Eq Jar Record at Request o~ n I I ' • C 0 ,, .,~u&·4 c-{ 1~.fk ' • 2! = ~ o· a s s ~ je;ff;;j, ~F l ,Ill • ,. c- " FORML!tllf, ForUldia~of Tll!l Dollars a.nd other good and valuable eons1.derat1on.a FIRST CHURCH OF THE tfAZARENE. Renton, \iasbingtOI.t 1lw roao.iac dacribtd r.i nc.1e, lil-.i ia t1w c~ ut Ktng , sa.. el W~cm: Tti. vest 550 t'Ht or• P.lRCEL A: North lOO feet or t~e nortb balt of south halt of soutbliest quarter ot th• northwest quart~r loeated 1n Section 10, Tovnship 23 Horth, Range 5 Eaatt W.M •• in. :!Cing County. Washington: Except portion lying within 132nd ATe. S.E. The West 550 teet or, PARCEL B: North half' o~ south half of southwest quarter of northwest quart•r o~ Section 10, Town.ahip 23 Nortn, Range 5 East, W.K., ln JC1ng County. v .. hlngton; Es:cept the north 100 feet tbereor a.ad it.Z.cept the south 110 feet thereo~. and .xcept po~t1on lytng within 132nd Av,. S.E. Partial This d"ed. is •h11!11. 1,/ llllfilQle-nt or tllat c:ertab real e•t,&te eoatract bet•e11111 the parties heh-lo. ~•ted llovem.ber 11 , U 75, .. d tJODdHioaecl ror 1'• coaTeyaace ot tlle abof'e d~scribe-d pt004!'f'tJ',aad tile covenant.a or wanaaty 11:erela coetalll9d aball 11ot applJ to &PJ title. interf!'st or enc111nibraacll!! arblnc by. t11.ro111b nr ander the parellaaer ia aald contn.et, an4 sbdl l\ot •Pr:1 to ~J' ta.ui.s. ai..se.s.smeob or other cllar1e.s le.-1.-d, aH;eaaed or bec:0111l111 due s11b5eq11ent t" lh ... date .:if saic1 enntract. 8th Sit.lES rM PAj::1 (.1,'j COt,'.':(·.; _::.,, ~:ui..:!F..Z.?'i.,(" II/HG ~-RW.i,":JS DIVISION If i "•• C ·I¢• ST.~TE Of W . .\SlffSGTO!'o:. C'ouaty of King ( .. ' -, DEPUTY ?red Albel"'ts and Donna A1berts to 1M U(llftl lo be Ille ira.if"~' & ilea::ri!Jed ia ud • t:aellled tht .-idiia ud ~ ----. and ,.. 1111d W.tary Kl ....... f• • ::.:Lo : fard Ullll th•J tiped ml _. a their -... ,..,_. tMTcia ........ Btll """ Non,.,,er, 1976 <Z{J.,l?E.~-.-......, !:sscquab Description: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1976.1122.691 Page: 1 of 1 Order: br Comment: '?:>/~r'-\_ ~; AMERICAN W tt)~ \'l- AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO: llllllllllilllllll 20141028000556 FIRST AMERICAN NISC ,,.ea PAGE•HI OF 003 10128/2114 tl:2B KING COUNTY I 1,1A Name Address City/State Renton Church of the Nazarene PO BOX 2640 Renton, WA 98059 Document Tltle{s): 1. Statement of Fact Reference Number(s) of Documents Assigned or released: 7511180394 Grantor(s): 1. Renton Church of the Nazarene 2. [ ] Additional information on page of document Grantee(s): 1. Renton Church of the Nazarene 2. ] Additional information on page of document Abbreviated Legal Description: LOT B, BLA NO. LUA-03-098 LLA, REC. 20040212900008, KING COUNTY Tax Parcel Number(s): 102305-9095-03 and 102305-9095-94 J Complete legal description is on page of document ; .:S DOCUMENT IS RECORDE,, ·\SA COURTZSY ONLY FIRST AM::PrCM,l TITLE INSURANC.: <'.O. ASSU1\.1l$ !/; UABILITY FOR ~UFFICIENCY, \,~LIDITY OR "-CURACY 20'141028000556.001 Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC:2014 20141028000556N53033 Page 1 of 3 Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:10:31 AM !ST 20141028000556.002 To Whom It May Concern: 10/24/14 Page 1 of2 STATEMENT OF FACT This document is created to confinm and solidify the facts regarding the property owned fully by the Renton Church of the Nazarene and/or Church of the Nazarene in Renton Parcel #102305- 9095. This parcel, along with the parcel #102305-9078, was purchased on November 11,1975 from Fred and Donna Alberts on Contract #7511180394 for a price of $70,000.00, $40,000.00 of which was paid by 11/8/1976. Prior to the construction of the Church building in 1980 the entire balance of the land was paid off. This was a requirement of the Bank to make the building loan. The Bank loan was paid in full in 1993. The Renton Church of the Nazarene and/or Church of the Nazarene in Renton has been debt free since 1993. Rustin E. Brian, PhD, Pastor of the Renton Church of the Nazarene and/or Church of the Nazarene in Renton, Stephen C. Dillingham, Secretary of the Board are authorized by the General Church of the Nazarene Manual page 65 #102.3 "The pastor and the secretary of the church board shall be the president and secretary of the church, incorporated or not incorporated, and shall execute and sign all conveyances of real estate. mortgages, releases of mortgages, contracts and other legal documents of the church not otherwise provided for In the Manual and subject to the restrictions set forth in 104-104.3." We do attest to fully owning the Parcel #102205-9095 that we are currently selling. We attest to no outstanding liens or taxes due now or in the past on our property. Order: Quick~ew_ Doc: KC:2014 20141028000556-53033 Page 2 of 3 Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:10:32 AM !ST .. . Signatures: Renton Church of the Nazarene P.O. Box 2640 850 Union Avenue N.E. Bv: Rustin E. Brian, PhD, President, Pastor of the Board t;~ dtb dt:i/Y / 20141028000556.003 Page 2 of2 ~ ,1. rY--ujtAt1y/ A.Le..e. CHERYL B. LEE NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNES, 2018 Order. QuickView_ Doc: KC:2014 20141028000556-53033 Page 3 of3 Created By: Hemalatlla.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:10:32 AM !ST ( h,smt l•pt l 2 40 ' t Sept 4 40 $1 OTC f ..\nne G :i.urlolt; Li» Merriclt ..e. ley ~ adHa,.lan '-orliss adJen.ale L Jla. Corli ;a,11!"1' to PUget Sou~d Power alll.igt:t Coapaa:,, Bai ley, llh, '11,l li• a Mil a arp Fp cye:io grat t sp---se 2Q70090-~~~l• otp.i .. --- !h• Na-or ta si o·· ti. swt or toe NWt ,~ 3ec 10 t~ &3 ar 5 ·- ---tll• ceat ln---a:: now l:i~ 011. as mey relooated t,y :r11tual oon.a.-- ---(blaatlag prg(t striolm11)-----(atg prgrr atr10Jte11 )--- *illia:n Corlis .Tall.llie L ~lia A41l• G lll• r ri olt Ll.lJ'e llerrlcJt Bailey Harloa Bat 1•7 by .llaauel ~rry ell lccw S.~t 4 ~ t, William Curlis an <1 .Te::nie L Oorlia ll1' ldward f Thwli:g n; f.:,r the n NS at • na P'eb :5 4.3 kcw ~pt • 4C c; llallll.el rerrr air tor .ume G ..:errioll:,Lu• hr:-iclt lleiley smhe.rlaa oaUey Dt 5d~ O •:.w,lltl a;, rcr ttle aw rea at• a P'et 3 "3( al•" swl J . .J- .1 1 EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SYSTEM REGOROED 1HIS nAY Ju" 11 10 29 !H 'RI .:, ,, ~,1·: _ • .,,1,: JF RE(:1\i6s', ELECTIONS KING COUNTY ~ :::;=====~F~I~R~S~T'.::'C~H~U~R~C~H'.::'O~F::::'.T~HE:'.'::~N~A~Z~ARE":'N":'E~,::"RE~N~T~ON~, =W~A~S~H~IN~G~T~O=N~, ==== ~ ["Gr11ntor·• hcrcinl, gmnls, convoys n11d wnmm!s to PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, n W;ishlnglon cur- ;:;-parntlon ("Grnnlcc" !w.rcin/, for lhc p11rposm hcreinaflcr sci forlh a porpotunl cnsomonl umlcr, across and ovor lhe fol- ;}. lowln(I Llcsi.rihcd real property [thc "Proporly" hcrolnl King Connly, Wn.,hinglan. ".'-! ·' ·' Southwest 1/4 of the 23 North, Range 5 East, C::;) I,(') The North 1/2 of tha South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 10, Township W.M., in King county, Washington; E!~CEPT the north 100 feet thereof and feet thereof, and EXCEPT that portion Avenue s. E. <> (") ~~ EXCEPT the south 110 lying within 132nd :~ ,;::_ ~ &cupl as l?IIIY bo otherwise sel forth herein Gr~nloo·s righlS shall be eiterci.,ed upon lhnl portion of1h.o Property {lhe "Right-- of Wny" hel'eln) doscribed rui follows: .'rAight"'J:.W~-----------:-fec1-ln-fflftll!,1'iffl,fflg'-------------Feet~tllil,e&l!llf'P,, f I er A 8BRl!P- lffll!l'fl11911f'lhetl"llr~e,- The south 17.5 feet cf the above described property. Providing access is not available over roadways and· p.;_-~king areas, Grantor agrees to construct and maintain a road for access purposes to Grantee's facilities, said road to be open and clear so that Puget's maintenance vehicles can drive to said facilities without having to remove obstacles of any nature. Said construction and maintenance to be at Grantor's expense. 1. Purpo,i,. Grnnlee shnll hallll lhc righl to cun~truc1.operale, mnintaln, ropnir, ropluceand ordattt0 an unduf.g:ruund 11h!clric transmission 11nd/or distribulion syslcrn upon nnd undor lhe R1gh1-af-Wny togclhor with ell 111;100111111ry or convonionl np- purlmmncos thcrofor. which mny includo hut nre not limited lo the following: undorground conduits. Cilblcs. communkaUon lines; vaul11, manholes, switches. nm! lrn115forml!rs; nnd semJ-b11ried or ground mounlod fm::i!ilies. Following lho initial con- s!ructlon of ilS focililie9. Grnntee may from llmo 10 lime co1111tn1ct such 11ddiliorui.l focilllies 115 it may require. 2-Access. Grantee shnll h11Ye the right ofaccellS lo 1h11 Rlght-af.Wny aver nnd across lho Properly to onable Grnntea !001(8r- cioo i1s rtghlS horoun1ler, provided. lhal Grnn!co shall mmpen.'llllo Gmn!or for nny damage to lho Prnp!!rty en used by the oxor- cl,o of .mid rii:Ju of <1ccou. l, ObslructioJI,: Loo1bc;nping. Gmnleo may from Cimo !o lime remove trees, bushl'S, or olhcr obslructions wilhin the RJght- of-Wn)' and may lovcl nnd grncfo !ho Right-of-Way to !he l!itl-Onl ronsonnbly neCCSSllry lo c:rmy out lhe purposoa s~t forth in pnm11rnph 1 herr.of, provided. lhnt fol!owlng 011y such work. Gmn1oe shall. lo Iha oittont roasonohly pmcliC11ble. r1r.1klro the Right-of-'Nar to 1h11 comlltlon II was in1medl11toly prior to sur.h work. Following lhe Installation of Gnmlee's underground fociU1ios, Crontor mn)' tinrlorlnko 11ny ordlnm1· improv11m11nts lo lhe lnndscupinll a[ lhe Rlghl-of-Way, provided that rm trtl(.'11 or other p!nnla shnll be plncod thereon which ll't'tdd Im unrensonably ux1:i,msiveo or improcliCDI for Grantee lo remove and ros1ore. 4, Grantor's Use of !Ughl-of-Way. Gran I or ruserves Iha right lo use lhe Righi-of-Way for any purpose nol im:onslstonl wHh lhe rlghl~ herein grnnted, provided: lhnl Gran I or shall ool construct or mnintnin any buildins or other slructuro on the Righl- or-Wny which would inlorrere wllh lho oxcrciso of lho rights horoln grunted; th111 no d!gglng, tunnallng or olher form of con- slruction acllvily shall ho dono on tho Properly whidi would di11urh lhe compaciion or unenrlh Grantee'a fncilities on lhe Righl-of-Wny, or cml1mgcr the late ml supporl lo s.,i,L foci II ties; ;ind that no bl;uling shnll be dom! wilhin t5 feet or the Righi-of• Woy. S, Indemnity. By occepllng and reGording lhl1 .. aaemenl. Grantee ogrus lo indemnify and hold hormhm Grnnlor from any and all claim, for injuriel and/or damages 1uffered by illlY person which may be cau$8d by lhe Gr11ntee's exercise oI the rlghlll herein granted; provided thal Grim!ee Jholl not be re,ponslb!e to Grantor for any injurlH and/or damages to any person caused by acts or omissions of Granlor. 8. Abmdomnenl, Tho rightH herein grnnlcd 3hall cor,linue until such lime /t8 Granlco cen9!!5 to use tho Righi-of-Way for a period of five /5) succes:1iYE-years. in which cwmt lhfJ ansomenl shall 1orminnte nnd all rights hereunder shall reverl lo Gran- lor. provided Iha! no abandonment shall ha deemed lo have occurred b~· reuson of Grantee's foHure to inlllalty imrlall Us facilities on tho R18{1t-of-Way within any period of limo from Iha dalo hereof. 1, S111X.euon nnd A.11lp1J. The rlghls nnd ob!iga1i11111 of lhe parties shnll inura 10 tfl(I honefll of ond be bindln(lupon lhelr rc.spec11vc ~11cr:essor1 and llllrigns. 3442'9 FILED FOR RECORO AT REQUEST OF: >H/44 PUGET PO''IER 1% EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED R-1262 REAL ESTATE DMSlON f1111.ll' 1-ra 235/38 -PIJGET POWEA SLOG, BELU:WE, WASHlf~GTON 98008 Sy ATIENTION: WAYNE BRESSLER ,o ~n.s q,. Roconls Division ~'-J -:c!-l ..... ~.,..,, '-· , D11pufy Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC: 1980 8006240435-53033 Page I of 2 Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:09:46 AM !ST ;_,,I J ,, ·, :,: ·-~-~ ,,::t~ .r l OA'IED this /2 .f!!. day ot j ,,,_gg, GRANTOR FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE, RENTON, :;-;·~:!'-d 22 44 e;.<--,., •.. ,.,,,. STATB OF WASHINGTON" I ss COUNTY OF I On 1hls day porsonally appeared befora ma to mo known lO be tha indMilual _ doscrib8d In nnd who oxeculod the wtthin and roregoing in&trumi!nl, and nclmowledgcd lhnt ----si81lod ti-,:, snmo 1111 froe nnd YQ}unlary act and deed for !ho UBe8 nnd purposog !hll'l'oin mcmthmcd. GIVEN undor my hnnd nnd oHiclnl senl this ---doy or S'I'ATEOFWASHINGTON I ss COUNTY OF l On lhls ctny pnr1ona1ty·,1f1Pellrod beforo mo Notary Publlt;: In nnd [or Iha Slota oF Wiuhinglon, rosldln, nt ·"---· to mo known 10 ho thu imllvldunl _ descrlb«I in and who eireculcd the wilhln aad foregoing instrument, nnd ncknowledged thnt ____ signed lho snmc 118 free and volunlnry act nnd dead [or tho ulleB nnd purpoBUll lheroin monllonad, GIVEN under my bond nnd official seal this ---day of STATBOFWASHINGTON J ss COUNTY OF ) On lhis dny rorronally oppeurod beforo ma Nolnry Public In and for Iha Stole of Woshinston, resid!n11 al ·"---· lo me known 10 bu lhe individual_ cl8&Crihm:I in nrnl who oxecuted 1he wlthln and forngoing !nstrumenl, nnd acknowledged tbot ____ slgnod !ho ~11mo !18 fnm nnd vohmtnry ncl nnd daed for tho UJOII ond JIUrpOBH tharein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand orid officinl S8!1l this ---tiny of STATBOFWASHINCTON ) Notary Public in and rD!' the Slate or Wll!lhinglon, reeiding nt ·"---· ss CORPORATE ACKNOWt.!DCMENT COUNTY OF King I On 1his ~ d,iy of ~ U t,Jt-, 1!I .8.Q_ , before mu, lhc und1mrigncd, pcmmally oppa11red l.OUJFI L D, IAlifl-K6"1\ nnd to mo known to ho 1h11 f>As.TOR -PRFS1De::ur <1ml . . rcspec1iv6ly. of FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE r mm=N, ~t,J&;cp_ornlion lhat 11:wculed tho_Jp,rngi;,I~ Instrument, nnd ncknowlodeed •!le snid imllrumont 10 be lhe froo and vohmtary act and deed of said corpumllon, for lhe .us/ls ll~P,Urposer lhereln mentioned. and on oath ,111ted thnt J./.f:: IS, aulbo112.ed to execute the 110\1MflstrU;,..~A.t:qrxJ lhnl the senl affixllll is 1h11 corporalo S011! of ,nid corpornlion. · Wl!nes.1 my hand and o(ficiol sen! hereto atrlxad lhe day and year first .:ibovo wlillan. ' ,--- ----~-' - I I j 1 1 I 1 • Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC:1980 8006240435-53033 Page 2 of 2 Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:09:47 AM !ST I i I UTI UTIES HI S1~I!'.!.I!!!. R£COROf:fl l rir.l rat; '.\fr I \hi Ml •ii BY I!'~ Oi.\.' ;;,,' ~· ··.';,-,. ·J~-i- ~~-,S ~. s::t'!:!C.~= -~,CO'JH~f THJS INSTRUMENT, made this~day of __ _,Js"l!>'..-----------1,9.J!.L; by and between Flenton Church of the Nazan:oeand, __________________ _ --------------~"'--------------------------------'"'----------------- ------------------""''----------------- hereinafter called "Grantor(s)", and the CITY OF RE~TON, a /'lunlelpal Corl)Or.ation of King County, Washington, hereinafter c:a\led ''Grantee". WITNESSETH: That s.aid Grancor(s), for and in consideration of the sum of Sala•sOO~--~- aid by Grantee, arid other valuable c:onsideratlon, do b'j ',"h-.-,.-.-,-,-,c,-,""",-,-,-,-,0,-, s,c,-,0,=,;,-,--".,s'el l , convey, and warrant unto the sa.l d Gr.1ntee, rts successors and ;usigns, an e.asem1mt for public utilities (Including water and sewer) with nec:e.1.sary appurtenam:es over, through, across and upon the fol lc,wing described property in King Count'/, War.hington, more particularly described .l$ fol laws: Legal Descl'iptlon or Utility Ea_sements Eaaement HI, A 17. 5 ft. Utility Easement The south 17, 5 feet of the west 500 feet of the following: The N 1/Z or the S 1/Z of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 10, TZJN, RSE, W.M,, EXCEPT the nol'th 100 feet thereof and except that pOrtion lying within 13Znd Ave, SE. Easement 1#2.1 A 10 ft, Utility Easement The nol"th 10 feet of the east 816.45 feet of the north 100 feet of the N l/Z of the S 1/Z or SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 10, TZ3N, RSE. w·,M,, EXCEPT pol"tion lying within 132.nd Ave. SE. Ea.11ement /13 1 A 15 ft, Utility Easement Commencing at the NE comer of the north 100 fe~t of the N 1/Z of the S 1/Z of the SW 1/4 or the NW 1/4 of SediO.D 10, TZJN, RSE, w.M. and proceeding along tbe north line a£ said subdivision N 88,6 24'47'' W 808. 95 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence S !°35'13" W Zl8, 3 feet t to the south Ii.De of the N 1/2 of the S 1/Z of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 10, TZJN, RSE W.M. The above deecription is of the centerli.ne of said 15' utility easement. mm rnR RECORD AT REQUEST OF / ,m;, Of 111! mrr (LERK Rttm.M MURICIP.U BlDG. / 21.10 tt:lt .m. so. / ~tfl".l"N, IU !18055 -.,, : 61/09,/02 RECD F CASHSL 10545 B 4,00 ,,,,..,,,,*4. 00 22 Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC: 1981 8109020545"'53033 Page 1 of 2 Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:07:56 AM !ST • Said ~eretofJ?re mentioned 9rantee, its successors or assigns, shall have the rtght, without prior notice or proceeding at law, at such times as may be necessary to enter upon sa1d above described properi;y for the purpose of. constructing~ maintaining, repairing, altering or reconstructing said ut1~1ty~ or making any connections therewith, without incu1·ring any legal obhgations or liability therefore, provided, that such construction, main- taining, repairing, altering or reconstruction of such utility shall be acco°"lished in such a manner that the ~r?vate i!lilrovements existing 1rl the right rfght(s)-af-way shall not be disturbed or damaged, or in the event they are disturbed or damaged, they w111 be replaced in as good a condition as they were 11111adiately before the J)roperty was entered upon by the Grantee. The Granter shall fully use and enjoy the aforedescribed premises, including the right to ~tain the right to use the s11rface of said right-of-way if such use does not interfere with installation and maintenance of the utility line. However, .the granter shall not erect buildings or structures over, under or across the ·right-of-wzy during the existence of such utility. This eilsement, shall be a covenant running wHh the land and shall be t,ind- ing on the Granter, h1s successors, he1rs and assigns. Granters covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful r"ight to execute this agreenent. 1 ,. ?-#(:;;<:"~_:2)_ 6 @'.o,4.,,-, and --!Ll";",.-};"u-,."'=-'-"·-':c..··,;,~;.' 9,r"· cc"7.;,ec.e?f.=~_,,_~/"--- CORPORATE FORM: STATE OF COUHTY OF Wo.o) t"'" l _J'l<"-', .,_;.,,.,,1..----i ~ ) '"' "'' ss On th1s \ Q day of~\! J) ~ ,~.fl before me, the undersigned, a Notary Publ1c ,n and for the ate a~~ uly coll1llissioned and sworn personally appeared an to .. 1cnow~ to~ the i~~0.,,,1e'3:\-'"d i),ec ""+Mu . ,e,,ec,1ve1,, of~ a~ ('~1,\\','!.?.~.":tJ,..J:he co poratton atjixecuted the fore- goingtlstrument. an aCflmii~t! the said instru1m.:nt to be the tree an~ voluntary act and deed of sai orporation, for the uses and purposes therern mentioned. and cin oath stated tha authorized to executl? the said tnstrulllE!nt and that the seal affh.ed is t e o porate seal of said corporatioo. WITNESS ll1Y hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certi fi ca te above wr1 tten • UE#J-2b Ordec: QuickView_ Doc: KC:19818109020545-53033 Page 2 of 2 Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:07:57 AM 1ST l l I 1 j I ! I l ' ' 1 l ! t CERTIF!r.ATE WHEN RE.COROEO RETURN TO: I, .1he u~,::r,i;;ned, . ~If Clerk of the Crty of t;arrton, w~:hmgton, certif)'tllatthls Is a true Office of th~ c: ry --1 ·rk lunton Mums,,.,~f t;wliditl.g 200 Mill.A \'enUi: :,Outh R,oto~ A ''°9' 0 • t...? ~ "' ..... ~ "' ~·-· -~ SubscribedaMSeal :~::::·~~ --~-. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4612 lllJ OIID~ OP TUB CITY OF REN'l'Olli, 1fASBIN1atull, ESTABLISB::IRG lU>t ASSESSKllllT DISTRICT POR SAJIITAIIY SBIIZR. SUVJ:C:Z Dr A PORTIOIII OF TBE SOOT.II IIIQBLAHDS, DATIIU OOQS, AND DPLEWOOO sml-Bll.S:INS AHO :&:STABLISKIHG 1'11:&: AllOU!lT OF TIIE CHlUlGB tJl'Olf Com!ECTION TO TBB: li'ACU.ITIES . THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, 00 ORDAIN AS l"OLI.OWS : S8CTION I. There is hereby created a Sanitary Sewer Service Special ASsessment District for the area served ]Jy the East Renton Sanit:ary Sewer Intercepto_r in the northeast quadrant of the City of Rent.on and a portion cf its urban growth area within unincorpora~ed King County, which area is more particularly described in Exhibit "'A" actached hereto. A map of Che service area is attached as Bxhibit ~s.H The recording of this document is to provide notification of potential connection and interest eharges. While this connection charge may be paid at a~y time. the . City does not require payment untiJ. such time as t:ne parcel is connected to and thus benefiting from the sewer facilities. The property ma.y be sold or in any other way change hands without triggering the requirement, by the City, of payment of the charges associated with this district. SIC,T;roN U Persons conoecting to the sanitary sewer facilities in this Special Assessment District and which p:1'0perties ~ ~ ~ .!, * ~ := 0 = 8 'l = ~ § ----"' i !II i!l .... "" t l • .;; r g f I I l ' i _t:__ _______________________________ _ Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC: 1996 9606210966-53033 Page 1 of 7 Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:08:52 AM !ST I ! l t l l I I J • ORDINANCE 4612 ~ave not been charged or assessed with all costs of the East Renton Sanitary Sewer Interceptor, as detailed in this ordinance, shall pay, in addition to the payment of the connection permit fee and in addition to the system development charge, the following additional fees: A. Per Unit Charge. New connections of residential d,telling units or equivalents shall pay a fee of $224.52 per dwelling unit and all other uses shall pay a unit charge or $0. 069 per square foot of property. Those properties included within this Special Assessment District and which may be assessed a charge thereunder are included within the boundary leg-ally described in Exhibit "A" and which boundary is shown on the 0 tn2.p attached as l!Xhibit "B." SECTION III. In addition to. the aforestated charges, there shall be a charge of 4.11\ per annum added to the Per Unit Charge. The interest charge shall accrue for no more than ten (10) years from the date this ordinance becomes effective. Interest charges will be simple interest and not compound interest. SECTION IV. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty (30) days after publication'. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this·~ day of~...,.J~µ~n~e~~~L 1996. City Clerk 2 Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC:1996 9606210966-53033 Page 2 of 7 Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:08:53 AM !ST OltDINANCE 4612 APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 10th day of ~-J~u~n_e~~~~~' 1996. Appro~as to form, . oe~~., .. ,a-- Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: 6/14/96 ORD.576:5/20/96:as. Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC:1996 9606210966'v53033 3 Page 3 of 7 Tanner, Mayor I 1 I ' • I Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:08:53 AM !ST 1 I ; ; ' Exhibit A LEGAL DESCmPTION OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR THE CITY OF RENTON -EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR Portions of Sections 8, 9, 10, 11. 14. 15, 16, 17, 21 and 22 all in Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. in King County, Washington Section s, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. All of that portion of Section 8, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. lylng East of the East right-of-way line of SR-405 and South of the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of the East line of said Section 8 with the centerline of 'NE 7th Street; thence Westerly along said centerline of NE 7th Street to its intersection with the centerline of Sunset Boulevard NE; thence Northerly along the centerline of Sunset Boulevard NE to the North line of the Southeast 'A of sa1d Section 8; thence West along said North line to the East right-of-way line of SR-405 and the terminus of said line. · Section 9, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. All of that portion of Section 9, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. lying South and East !)f the following described line: Beginning on the centerline of NE 7th Street at its intersection with the centerline of Edmonds Avenue NE; thence Easterly along the centerline of NE 7th Street to Its intersection with the centerline of Monroe Avenue NE; thence North along said centerline to the South l!ne of the Northeast 1A of said Section 9; thence East along said South line tD its intersection with the centerline of Redmond Avenue NE; thence Northerly along said centerline to Its intersection with the centerline of NE 10th Street; thence East along said centerline to the East line of said Section 9 and the terminus of said line. Section 10, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. All of that ~rtion of Section 10, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. lying Southerly and Wester1y of the following described line: Beginning on the West line of Section 10 at its Intersection with the North lJne of the South 1h of the North ~ of said Section 10; thence East along said North line to Its Intersection with the centerline of 142nd Avenue SE; thence Southerly along said centerline to its intersection with the North line. of the Southeast ~ of sa1d Section 10; thence East along said North line to its intersection with the East line of said Section l O and the tenninus of said line. Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC:!996 9606210966-53033 Page 4 of 7 Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:08:54 AM 1ST I I I l j Legal Description of the Special Assessment District for th£ City ef Renton~ East Renlan Inrercepwr Section 11, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of the Southwest 14 of Section 11. Township 23N, Range SE W.M .. Section 14, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. Page 2of3 All of that portion of Section 14. Township 23N, Range SE. W.M. described as follows: All of the Northwest 14 of said section, together with the Southwest 14 of said section, except the South 'h of the Southeast \4 of said Southwest \4 and except the plat of McIntire Homesites and 1h of streets adjacent as recorded In the Book of Plats, Volume 58, Page 82, Records of King County. Washington, and except the South 151.55 feet of the East 239.435 feet of Tract 6, Block 1 of Cedar River Five Acre Tracts as recorded In the Book of Plats, Volume 16, Page 52, Records of King County, Washington, less 1h of the street abutting said portion of Tract 6, Block l, and less Tract 6, Block 2 of said Cedar River Ftve Acre Tracts, less 'h of the street adjacent to said Tract 6, Block 2, and except the South 82. 785 feet of the East 150 feet of Tract 5, Block 2 of said Cedar River Fl.ve Acre Tracts and less 'h the street adjacent to said portion of Tract 5, Block 2. Section 15, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of Section 15, Township 23N, Range SE. W.M., eia:ept the Southwest \4 of the Southwest \4 of the Southwest 14 of said section. Section 16, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of Section 16. Township 23N. Range SE W.M., except that portion of the Southeast V. of the Southeast \4 of the said Section 16 lying East of the East Une of the Plat of Maplewood Division No. 2 as recorded In the Book of Plats Volume 39, page 39, Records of King County Washington and its Northerly extension to the North line of said Southeast 14 of the Southeast V. of the said Section 16 and except that portion of said section lying Southerly o.f the, Northerly right-of-way line of SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway]. · Section 17, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of Section 17, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M., lying Northeasterly of the Northeasterly right-of-way of SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway) and Easterly of the East right-of-way line of SR-405 less that portion lying generally West of the East and Southeasterly line of Bronson Way NE lying ' ,. j l ''------------------------------------IE Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC:1996 9606210966-53033 Pages of7 Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:08:54 AM !ST Legal Description of the Special Assessment Distrid for the City of Renton -!'Ast R.ent<m Inierceptor Page3of3 between the South line of the NE 3rd Street and the Northeasterly margin of SR- 405. section 21, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All that portion of Section 21. Township 23N. R 5E W.M. lying Northeasterly of the Northeasterly right-of-way line of SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway) and West of the East line of the Plat of Maplewood Dlv:lsion No. 2 as recorded in the Book of Plats, volume 39, page 39. Records of King County, Washington. Section 22, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of Section 22, Township 23N. Range 5E W.M. descrtbed as follows: All of the Northwest \4 of the Northeast \4 of said Section 22 JvirJ,!! Northerly of the Southerly line of the Plat of Maplewood Heights as recorded in tne Book of Plats. volume 78, pages 1 through 4, Records of King County, Washington. Together with the North 227.11 feet of the West 97.02 of the Northeast 11< of the Northeast l4 of said Section 22. I I i ' i I I l I I l I ! Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC:1996 9606210966-53033 Page 6 of 7 Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:08:54 AM !ST Exhibit B EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR Special Assessment District Boundary Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC:1996 9606210966-53033 Page 7 of 7 1 :24,000 ------City Limits [ZTJ.J.J Special Anessmont Dlslri<:t Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:08:55 AM 1ST ,, ~ 1 ~ ~1 ~ ~ 'I ----·:-:-, ;JJ,o "~--< ,c ~,::, .,,, ti> o ms a /£..2. ___:!_! ....:s--_ -- CITi Of ~TON MON ,11159 FGUND _h• l/2" ilRAS$. 1)1.S(: W/ P1JNr:11 MAR~ 0t. A of" X 4" C\JN!,·· li!IJl>t. GASE Al PORTION OF THE SW 1 /4 OF THE NW 1 /4 SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. _-st-c-. LUA -03 098 LIA \ \ Nf. :i,}tn SlR[O .X-lJ~ION AVE·t,£ (O!/Ci1) N :J&;:S;'.!1.1000 fi<CAS) CITY OF RENTON. STATE OF WASHINGTON ~~#:;"_c ISSl LND -.50 _-_002_,_, ____ _ \ ? · 16 7 1236.85~1<SAS) \ ' . \ ···--;~Sc.+~-___ · _N._!:. 12TH STREET ' 'l' 1,11:J,'rJs_·;,1 ·w 2os105 (MOi:s'.) --co.-,::in OF Rl;"N "rON l,{fu_ .'j'806 ·1 · -. tOUNO 2-~ BIIASS OiS-C W/ "'f.." ,. ON A 4'.' X 4·• CQl:it'.. t.1,)NCA\k Al· 8 /· Ne: l~A STf<ftT &c UNION AVE 1".E (0"3/m) JV t~~::. I t· N 1;,r·cnt::, .. sL 1u-2J-5 ::'· ~.-. _._,i: .. LEGEND -,1 . ' SECTION CORNU~ 1:• ;~I 1/4 GORN(R • ' • SET 1 /2'' RHlAR & GAF LS ~9470 (( PK NAIi CI-UPHIC ;:;("AU" ~-.,! _..., 1 1 1~ n:,r •w.·h !CU fl SURVEY NOTES iNSTRl!MfNI· Nl!(O<o! TOTAL STATION D!~IA10LC MflHO[J l)~t.0. flHD lRi.Vl:.RSf WllH Ao;nJA_ FIELD M(ASIJREMEN!S Af,0 ANC!.f~ WAC 33?-U0-090 D~ TE (If SURVEY· MARCH 2003 BASIS OF BFAP.lt,iG. WfST UNE. Of" Tl-I( NW 1/4 Of ~ UlNCHl,MRK: CITY Of ~~~~~l~-it,~st~u;:i;;}:·~Ri<SS £t' / 0 •. 1 ;f,,",';';',,1i~ ,11:;;6';:j' ·. ' ~ ;~_--N68··:is:2_,n11 --···--,N-.E. -·,ottt-srREEi rnut 1 .J,,'" BRASS 01sx-.::.,.; WlYo~r·1: .CONCRETE IN_)? ; 01SK IN CONCRETE MON IN CA Sf A I' !HE IN llR (JI Nt :Ith SlREET & UNION KVl hE -"u 1 ,. ' i'LFVATION "' -4-11.2/l' (NA\10 J>lll~) !< APPROVALS ~ ';;]l ··~. . -·:,,..E. 9 E~AMINfjl Al-Ill APf'ROVEll frllS _J_l__ DA) OI-f•~•1<,1•~ 2004 AU. --~__!!!~~~-'"'"'~~ .... .,______ - -'CJ!.Y or RENTO~ A01,m<1STRA1m -PLArSNINGjEiUILOING/~UclLIC WOR,<!; ' i '"'"I\ '"' .,,,,{·. '2 ~:.~· '' . "'.,.,,. . '~ ·' ,,,. '-,:-.H~. ----~·-OEPIHY f-'/10~-u{ru'/,~r-i.~"-' ~ ,., . . N . . ,·,. •·. ·--•-•. .· i "I'" .,1 00 .xm.,.. "~""'TY ASSfs·.' c:·R. .· -.·i,,~sns 1 01;.;,"l{ -, .. " ' -• ·• --·--• . .,. s I. "'"-'·='· ·• ,., ~ 0 . [ .p_J L:,;,iJ,':; !'Y ''L-·'J•;-,.;c " \ i .···LOT ·.R i gg_· t£~TIF'ICATE · ' --:-(~~-RE)-~ 0111NLR{Sl IN 'ff , ..... • . ' ,_.,.. ,. S • • 'F • .. -'''"""",- " ' ·-'"'" ' " \t! " ., . . " . . . . ' (Wf.).~,. ''"' """' '" ·. 'fS . CQC A ,,., ft,... ) " ~,,,, j' ~L' s I~ -L ', .--".:--·-1--,_,,.,~ '310c,4f.,Je. A 'IL' ~-'\ Wi ·nN,.u. . "!·. "1,...L,1_. I '~L .... ~~;; I'-N of .. •• . ,,c,csvw-"---t",f, --, ~ g .~-· ,'' ' ,'"··'''' . co,..:, -· , ' ' , , • '· . . , ..i:; ;s [" :-" '""'"''' . i c_'':'.'., ,, ', -.. .. , \ _) ' AC~NOWLEQ!JEME~ts ;~ tJ , · [ 1 . ,L~'.:c~,~AL t<c ~-" ... " '· .. ,., ... § 1 I Z '::] I 1if-,---· ,:, •!·• t-N&rnr;,2·,~ 2011 ~-, iCPLC:J ~ t .~s-rH-s!,Rfri:--_. I ;I //"" @i ,v_ ' \ •N ll:RSEC flON OF NE &,11 ST , k UNION AVE NE \ W I/~ COR SEC 10--23 5 \_ __ ~~~~d1 1~2'~JNRtRl\P'~K (03/03) N H:l.'i/48.6606 f 1671i55.9645 Lbl. l.lNE ADJUS~ME:Nl DATA LEGAL DESCRIPTION p ,l<<'.t, ~ Ill[ r.,0~111 H!O n-:·1 OF l'H~ N•.JRTh HALf ,~.-,rt ~Gull-< HAU' •Jf ]Hf. :;uu-HWE:;1 .J,,Al-/1[,, ,11 l".f ~i1•iT,1W£',; )IJKI-/TL~ OF S((TIC::N 10, TOY.fr<"St-11~· 2, Nl)Wth i<ANCf • /-·, i. '11 t,, li'I 011~G ;!;d-!fi. WA,,rllNGhJN, '"\CLP [H"-~01,1,uN ir,[;sl:01· ,Y1NG V,,THJN 11:co.c A\'f ";f i{l'/hli'; ~·1E r.,i,:;, ;,,:,,;n, r: OWNERS: f-:~N !UN Cf-lURCH Of THE N8ZAREN~ 95(i UNION 1..Vf. NE . R~rHON. WA 96056 PciONE; 425-271-5206 TO-IAL AREA ~ 27g,0JO SF ~ 0 41 LO! A 2 195,601 S.F L01 B "63,429SF EXISTING LQf-NOfffh -127.864 S.f" EXISTING IOT--SDUTl-t = 151,166 S.f" WE"ILAND ARE~. ,. .!,7,629 S.F !<.GRES" irlf •s1J·d:1 h~LI c,j ll'l ~OlJfll IIALI" 01 fHf ~u..,-•!lv..t.SI ·JUARfU< ,)f H[ NOf,T~IV/E'_;l (,u>/lffl· ,Ji ·~··11.~, ,u. l(),,,,.,,~lflP .'.) ·,oRi"H, k.'\,~GI. • H"'.T, \\M IN 1,,NG '\;JN!a .',A,SI-IIN•. f,!N, Fr,Ci'r-llll NURrt< ,oo fi:EL n-ffRl::UF >'S11J ADllRfSS PARCC.L A " 850 Ute!ION AVf NE AOORfSS PARCEL B ~ 4401 Nf 9TH ST F~,-"' 1111 ci0L•Ttl IIV Fffl f'ifl'<f"m •NLJ CX~~~ IH"-1 ,-,<jpl1\X< 11-,~~hit Lllt-ba 'lo<il1<t< IJ~NLO AVES.I:. l<!NION ,\Vi. tif.) RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE Nu ,1c,j In, r,.,.,,(I \1,,.,,-...,"jo; ,-r<.='4 ,/0•"-al\·~,,i l•vuk_\','_, ul ~--''t 1•<.1\i•=._\..\2._ <.1! ,,,. •~•jcJt-', / .. b .. r ., """'" ,J-""' L"f' ~i-:JI s-:t1Rt4t :LANO SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE ,r,~ .-~c.:, ~0rr,;.:1,} ,scprr,,o<cn\s a Glln.-G, ITU,)<, r,, ,,.". ~-, ~,;oe, m,-d,r.-c-t,on in C•)n1,Jrm211;;e ,.,tt, Ir" reqv,rePwnt:, "' the :.u, •,ey fi,:,:.c,r(lm·:; ,~! ti<•" rc--iu.e,,( ~! l>1ur,.I, ,-1/ Nazu,<;r,e IL" ~~, .-_11 :~:;;) ~~~rj ~------- ,~,., ifi""·'-n, c,47n CITr Of R(NTON t.tONie<S INTERSECTIOr,; OF NE th ST & fl(L[l AV( NE CENT R Of SEC 10-23-5, FNP 1 1/2" BRASS DISK W/PUf,IGH II, CAS< (03/03) N 16.1£1~.~118 (RlNTO:.} -~ 13139675270 (RENTON) ,. . . STA~_ Of w~H1.~GTQN i COONfr Gt,.lilNG ) ,...I -'". .-:· (,II r111sL v,1\" u ~ :iw. M,, WOR£ 1,1£ Pf.R$1)/;,our -A!<tc/J ro ME KNOIIN ro Bf fiif ~M C 71 :,,; 9'.twn Ba ,dSs:..-...1"'-?' if 11,t; c«IP(RAl/GN <I/Ill C,<£CU7UJ 111£ /Wf/1111 ANO f(JR[GW{r; iN5TlW/J£NT. AN[} At>iNOIII.WGtO .'iA/0 INSr/1(11.i(/'lf f[J B£. lHE if/U: AND V<l.1.WrM'\" ACI ANU {",£[0 CF S.410 DWCflAf/()fl, Fm n{F 1/SFS .WO Pl.If/POSES Tlf£RE/fl UfNf!CIIED. ANO ~ OAlh STAIEO /l!Af '1£_/W I(~~-,1/Hll«IJ11!J ro [X(CiJTE ~D INSrtWMloNl Ill ll/71'/£SS ~OF;---H,M4...t/[}/f{}H_ -l' J/Y }W/1) NID Cf'FJCML 5iA 1'11£ ru r ANfJ ll"ARFIRS(;A(W}R1~, _f.."?ff·D)-, NOTARY PIJfjlli_: IN ANU FOil fill I c:,,, ',fc,"~Jt(,f._,._ STATE Of WASHINGTON, R[901NG i ~~1,\~,-·--Lnc1, , AT--Edu•l-~--- L'.~~~~~:~_-,:•·,: ! AQUIFER PROTECTION NOTICE =NOTES.. . . ~~;~u~~g/! rz~Eg~~i s~i~~fci)~~Niu~~h-: !hf. WIS WA/fD HfREJN f,ILI.. ltH/-JI/, ~< 2 Or Rff{ff.A,i's AiJIJIFl:R fflOffC/IC!N ARI:",! AN!) l+H£ sw..Ecr 10 //1£ f/tWJREJJf}ITS Ct' /hi: ,!17.Q992 n,r DESCRIP.110N 1$ r-lOl SUFFJl;IENT TO SH(JW ns· LOCATION .. " . •, -:P~GET._,:!o~NO POW~ & LIGl;ir:co!JIPAfi'l' .. fAS£!.1.~T FOR ffiANSWSSION E_AS£l.!rn1 TnE CEtHE,!t IS 1--0CA-JED ONE 0 001 ~0Jl!J. Qf THl NOlfft, UNf Of Pl<OPEK.fl' lHE . OESCR1rnoN'IS NOT SUFFIC1ENT TP AC(;Ui{A'l'ELY SHOW ,ni , OCA 110N, RE CORO ED I.if.lorn Rf00ROING "-"' 40439,% . AGREEMENT £SrABL1SH1N~ AN·"AsSESSMf~l DISTRICT rOR 5ANIT.I.RY SE\\CR FACILITit.S H~CORDED-:LLNDER )?[CORDll-JG NO %06210966 -· . CJ{"/ Or 1?£N7r:I-I OF/{)/1/AI/Ci µJoJ ltND A:;" M,/{/'i{)fJ) er cti0/11.'.llw'. NO 0~ "fi/JS c,rr·s sou SOI.JRCE OF {)f/11/r(JN,J WAlfR IS 5IJpPUiI) FflCi.l A .lh'N.LOI!' A~ l!IIOCR fH£ CIT":"5 SI.Ji/FACE. l!it11f IS NO .VA71Jf/AL &<Hllffi BfT11£fN !HE WA/;!l;' rAEl£ AlliJ 1;1/WND SVRF,1C( E;{Tf/E}Jf CAR[; 51/0U{J) 8€ €X£/IC/'Sli) ltl/C/1 IIANDll!/(; NIY IJOl/i,J /'/f~~Wrm:t:! :;~ ~irc,JFo::::rc:c-:::::1::~~ ~i.x~~. n,f arfs !)#1//M/r; >ll\.~ RqlTQtj ... CHURCH .. , -LO r· LINE OF THlc NAZARrNE "-ADJLJS.JlviENT . fg TOUMA ENGINffRS R!U)TOI'( WA'.:iH1:NCTQN Wl:SI VALLHl:JUS:NESSl"Af/K [)~ llATf ---.--/;,u 1,<, 16J2 soun1 /~/ST PU!£ Sil!lt t 102 •l(CJo/1, II" ii,%.)2 DAN MMlOt.~00-!-·~~5· ,,,~-c-'li :P/liil<F (+25) 2~r ~~ ,~x (fZ~) 2:>1 -ar;i~ _ · · · · <":1-<~I) tll ·;,,,\ii' ol',[f." >.HIT lVc/" '" c • ~t ~ C<'j ,-~ ~tJJs '--'£RSt ~fis ~ t B.f :',13: ' , . . ----• --- .~ -z.- I I 1 I , I ! l' . ' ,, ' ~-\ • '·l ,· ~~ 1' ---~ l ,, ,· ' -"""'~ i _ . .,,,,-.,, ' ! • M_.--r,,-,,. ~ .... , .. ,. ,/ ,, ~ • .,. ,,. I ~-! its~ ,, ~ 2 , .. ' " ii i ~ ' .. hi~ I : ·' ' j~~ ~ t Ii~~ 1 ' i ; I . ~ l ~ •• ~., ~ e t ~ '-• '~ 'l i ,~~ ;:;ac:, l m ! ; ii ; I I 1· 'f ; ! • ~ ,a % 'I· z ~ h~ !i &p i ' ' I z r t; Q • z 0 ' • t ~ ' ~ ' 0 0 ' ~ ~ • ' • .• 1 ; ; ' ~ ' !-z ,• ~ g' r·· ". '! ' . :,; !~~~ ,~~i iii jh .. r~ Ut 3~"-~~ i ~ ' ' oaf ttr ~9.tii tt•·'t H"i" \ o,i,~ -'i~ ~" ~ ~~i~i '~'!' ~ '• ' i: ~ I~ ,..~~ it !.. l', ~ ~ ·'\, ~ i :ii~ 't ' ,, ' 1, • "' ·~~ r , i ~ ' i ~ ;1~ t } ~Ii i !,~ • ,, ' ~· ~ I\~~ ' '• ' ~~} .... hS! '1;1,; .... !1· ~ lit~ ''I ~ !,, ~ ill.~ ,>\ :~~ It, 1.:~11:: ~., J,o.lrii ~ .... AA. • • !!S ·t • ' ' ' I I ~ !! I { i r I : ! I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -1 ... 1 \ • ' -> .. " • .. L-''---'----------------------------------"°'"~ Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC: 1979 7905089006-53033 Page 1 of 1 g Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:06:45 AM !ST I Denis Law · c· f ---~M:,y:or~------1· I"'\ } _ 1tr_o / a_ __ _ July 15, 2015 Tom Redding Encompass Engineering & Survey 165 Juniper St, Ste 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 J u .. \,(~.-.rr t. r(.(i o .. \') o. l -~(stfil~~' ' -... Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator SUBJECT: Campbell Short Plat LUAlS-000239, ECF, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Redding: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended July 10, 2015 for the Administrative Short Plat approval and the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed, therefore, this decision is final and you may proceed with the next step of the short plat process. The applicant must comply with all Administrative Site Plan Conditions of Approval (dated June 22, 2015) before the short plat can be recorded. The enclosed handout, titled Short Plot Recording, provides detailed information for this process. Furthermore, the Administrative Short Plat decision will expire two (2) years from the. date of approval. If you are unable to file for recording within the two-year time-frame, a single one (1) year extension may be requested in writing, pursuant to RMC 4-7-070. For questions regarding filing for recording of your short plat, as well as for submitting revised plans, you may contact Kamran Yazdidoost (425) 430-7382. If you have any questions regarding the report and decision issued for this short plat proposal, please call me at (425) 430-7289. Sincerely, Clark H. Close Associate Planner Enclosure(s) cc: Renton Church of the Nazarene/ Owner(s) Peter St. Pierre/ Applicant Stephen Chow, losif Mishkov / Party(ies) of Record Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 , rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT of SHPL REC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS SHORT PLAT RECORDING Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 42S-430-7200 {press #4) Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE: To ensure the proposed land division is in accordance with City of Renton's adopted standards and consistent with the approved Short Plat. In addition, final review is used to verify compliance with any required conditions. COMPLETE APPLICATION REQUIRED: In order to accept your application, each of the numbered items must be submitted at the same time. If you have received a prior written waiver of a submittal item{s), please provide the waiver form in lieu of any submittal item not provided. All plans and attachments must be folded to a size not exceeding 8~ by 11 inches. APPLICATION SCREENING: Applicants are encouraged to bring in one copy of the application package for informal review by staff, prior to making the requested number of copies, colored drawings, or photo reductions. Please allow approximately 45 minutes for application screening. APPLICATION SUBMITIAL HOURS: Applications should be submitted to Planning Division staff at the 6th floor counter of Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, between 8:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. Monday through Friday. Please call your assigned project manager to schedule an appointment or call {425) 430-7200 extension 4 to reach the Planning Division. Due to the screening time required, applications delivered by messenger cannot be accepted. All Plans and Attachments must be folded 8 Yz"by 11" APPLICATION MATERIALS: D D D 1. 2. 3. Public Works Approval: Please provide confirmation that required improvements have either been substantially installed or deferred. Waiver Form: If you received a waiver form, please provide 4 copies of this form. Density Worksheet: Please submit 4 copies of a completed density worksheet. 1 H :\CED\Data\Forms-T emplates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\shplrec.doc Rev: 02/201S 0 4. Confirmation of Compliance with all Conditions of Plat Approval: Please provide 4 copies of a statement detailing how all conditions of plat approval have been addressed. 0 5. Plat Certificate or Title Report: Please provide 3 copies of a current Plat Certificate or Title Report obtained from a title company documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances of the involved parcel(s). The Title Report should include all parcels being developed, but no parcels that are not part of the development. If the Plat Certificate or Title Report references any recorded documents (i.e. easements, dedications, covenants) 4 copies of the referenced recorded document(s) must also be provided. All easements referenced in the Plat Certificate must be located, identified by type and recording number, and dimensioned on the Site Plan. 0 6. Draft Legal Documents: Please provide 4 copies of any proposed street dedications, restrictive covenants, draft Homeowners Association, or any other legal documents pertaining to the development and use ofthe property. 0 7. Post Office Approval: Please provide 2 copies of the Post Office confirmation that they approved your mailbox location(s). Contact Bill Sansaver of the Post Office at (425) 255-6389 or 1-800-275-8777 0 8. Additional Requirements for Plats with Private Utility and Access Easements: Short Plats with parcels requiring access via a private easement shall show the locations and widths of these proposed utility and access easements. The following two notes shall be included upon the face of the short plat: • Declaration of Covenant: The owner of land embraced within this short plat, in return for the benefits to accrue from this subdivision, by signing hereon covenants and agrees to convey the beneficial interest in the new easements shown on this short plat to any and all future purchasers of the lots, or of any subdivision thereof. The covenant shall run with the land as shown on this short plat. • Private Access and Utilities Maintenance Agreement: New private exclusive easement for ingress and egress is to be created upon the sale of lots shown on this short plat. The owners of lots shall hove an equal and undivided interest in the ownership and responsibility for maintenance of the private access easement appurtenances. These appurtenances and maintenance responsibilities include the repair and maintenance of the private access road, drainage pipes, and storm water quality and/or detention facilities within this easement, private signage, and other infrastructure not owned by the City of Renton or other utility providers. Maintenance costs shall be shared equally. Parking on the paving in the access easement is prohibited, unless pavement width is greater than 20 feet. (NOTE: If only one lot is subject to the agreement, contact the Public Works Department at 425-430-7235 for special language.) 2 1,..1,\ri:n\n::it.a\Fnrms-Temclates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\shplrec.doc Rev: 02/2015 D 9. Deed of Right-of-Way Dedication: If any public right-of-way is required for your project, please provide 3 copies of a draft deed of right-of-way dedication. D 10. Aquifer Protection Notice: For Short Plats within either of the Aquifer Protection Zones, the following notice must be included upon the face of the short plat: The Jots created herein fall within Zone (1 or 2} of Renton's Aquifer Protection Area and are subject to the requirements of the City of Renton Ordinance #4367. This City's sole source of drinking water is supplied from a shallow aquifer under the City surface. There is no natural barrier between the water table and ground surface. Extreme care should be exercised when handling of any liquid substance, other than water, to protect from contact with the ground surface. It is the homeowners' responsibility to protect the City's drinking water. D 11. Short Plat Plan for Recording: Please provide 4 copies of a fully-dimensioned plan prepared by a State of Washington registered professional land surveyor, drawn at a scale of l" = 40' on an 18" x 24" plan sheet (or other size or scale approved by the Planning Division) and including the following information: • Name of the proposed plat • In the upper right hand corner include the City land use file number (e.g. LUA02-037) and below in smaller font, the city LND number provided by the Property Services section (e.g. LND ) • Name and address of the licensed land surveyor/engineer • Legal description of the property to be subdivided • Date, graphic scale, and north arrow oriented to the top of the paper/plan sheet • Location and dimensions of all property lines including the square footages of each lot • Location of the subject site with respect to the nearest street intersections (including driveways and/or intersections opposite the subject property), alleys and other rights of way • Names, locations, types, widths and other dimensions of existing and proposed streets alleys, easements, parks, open spaces and reservations • Data sufficient to readily determine and reproduce on the ground the location, bearing, and length of every street, easement line, lot line, and boundary line on site. Dimensions shall be to the nearest one-hundredth {1/100) of a foot, angle, bearing, degree, minute and second. All measurements and bearings shall be mathematically correct • Coordinates shall be included per City of Renton surveying standards for permanent control monuments • Location and dimensions of all easements referenced in the plat certificate with the recording number and type of easement (e.g. access, sewer, etc.) indicated • Location and dimensions of any existing structures to remain within or abutting the plat • Location of critical areas and any required buffer on or adjacent to the site 3 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\shplrec.doc Rev: 02/2015 identified by type (e.g. floodplain, Category 1 Wetland, Class 3 Stream) Certifications: • Certification by a licensed land surveyor that a survey has been made and that monuments and stakes will be set • Only if the plat will not be served by sewer: Certification by the King County Department of Health that the proposed septic system(s) is acceptable to serve the plat • Certification of City approval to be signed by the Public Works Administrator • Certification of approval to be signed by King County Assessor and the Deputy King County Assessor • Signatures of all property owners showing on the title report (signatures must be notarized with an ink stamp-not embossed) D 12. Calculations: Please provide 3 copies of complete field calculations and computations noted for the plat and details (if any) of all distances, angles, and calculations together with information on the error of closure. The error of closure on any traverse shall not exceed l' in 10,000'. D 13. Tree Retention/Land Clearing (Tree Inventory) Plan: Please provide 4 copies of a fully dimensioned plan drawn by a certified arborist or a licensed landscape architect if ANY trees or vegetation are to be removed Oi alteied. The plan shall be based on finished grade, drawn at the same scale as the project site plan with the northern property line at the top of the paper, and clearly show the following: • All property boundaries and adjacent streets, location and dimensions of rights-of-way, utility lines, fire hydrants, street lighting, and easements; • Location of all areas proposed to be cleared; • Location, species, and sizes of trees on or immediately abutting the site. This requirement applies only to trees with a caliper of at least six inches (6"), or an alder or cottonwood tree with a caliper of at least eight inches (8"), when measured at fifty-four inches (54") above grade; • Clearly identify trees to be retained and to be removed; • Future building sites and drip lines of any trees which will overhang/ overlap a construction line. Where the drip line of a tree overlaps an area where construction activities will occur, this shall be indicated on the plan; • Show critical areas and buffers. D 14. Arborist Report: Please provide 4 copies of an arborist report by a certified arborist or a licensed landscape architect that correlates with the Tree Retention/ Land Clearing Plan and addresses the following: • Identification scheme used for each tree (e.g. tree number); • Species and size of each tree (caliper measured at 54 inches above grade); • Reason(s) for any tree removal (e.g. poor health, high risk of failure due to structure, defects, unavoidable isolation (high blow down potential), unsuitability of species, etc.) and for which no reasonable alternative 4 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\shplrec.doc Rev: 02/2015 action is possible (pruning, cabling, etc.); • For trees proposed to be retained, a complete description of each tree' s health, condition, and viability; • For trees proposed to be retained, a description of the method(s)used to determine the limits of disturbance (e.g., critical root zone, root plate diameter, or a case-by-case basis description for individual trees); • A description of the impact of necessary tree removal to the remaining trees, including those in a grove or on abutting properties; • The suggested location and species of supplemental trees to be used when required. The report shall include planting and maintenance specifications; • An analysis of retained trees according to Priority of Tree Retention Requirements specified in RMC 4-4-130H.1.b. 0 15. Landscape Plan, Detailed: Please provide 3 copies of a Landscaping Plan (Detailed) meeting the requirements of RMC 4-8-120D. 0 16. Irrigation Sprinkler Plan: Please provide 3 copies of an Irrigation Plan meeting the requirements of RMC 4-8-120D. 0 17. Wetland Mitigation Plan: (Only for projects with wetlands). Please provide 3 copies of a Final Mitigation Plan meeting the requirements of RMC 4-8-120D. 0 18. Stream and Lake Mitigation Plan: (Only for projects with streams/lakes). Please provide 3 copies of a plan meeting the requirements of RMC 4-8-120D. 0 19. Monument Cards: When a monument(s) is installed as part of the project, please provide Z copies of a form obtained from the City Technical Services Division and filled out by a surveyor providing information regarding a single monument, including the Section, Township and Range, method of location, type of mark found or set, manner of re-establishment of the single monument (if applicable), description, and a drawing showing the location of a single monument and indicating a reference point to that monument. 0 20. Proof of Improvement Deferral or Installation: Please provide 3 copies of the Improvement Deferral Form located in the Customer Service Center on the 61h Floor of Renton City Hall. Any deferrals of improvements must be approved by the Department of Community and Economic Development Planning Division Director prior to the recording of the short plat. 0 21. Plan Reductions: Please provide one 8 %" x 11" legible reduction of each full size plan sheet (unless waived by your City project manager). The sheets that are always needed in reduced form are: landscape plans, conceptual utility plans, site plan or plat plan, neighborhood detail map, topography map, tree cutting/land clearing plan, critical areas plans, grading plan, and building elevations. These reductions are used to prepare public notice posters and to provide the public with information 5 H: \CED\Data\Forms-T emplates\Self-Help Handouts\Pla nning\shplrec.doc Rev: 02/2015 about the project. The quality of these reductions must be good enough so that a photocopy of the reduced plan sheet is also legible. The reduced plans are typically sent in PDF format to the print shop and then are printed on opaque white mylar- type paper (aka rhino cover) to ensure legibility. If your reduced plans are not legible once photocopied, you will need to increase the font size or try a different paper type. Illegible reductions cannot be accepted. Please also be sure the reduced Neighborhood Detail Map is legible and will display enough cross streets to easily identify the project location when cropped to fit in a 4" by 6" public notice space. Once the reductions have been made, please also make one 8 W' x 11" regular photocopy of each photographic reduction sheet. Some of the local Renton print shops that should be able to provide you with reductions of your plans are Alliance Printing (425) 793-5474, Apperson Print Resources (425) 251-1850, and PIP Printing (425) 226-9656. Nearby print shops are Digital Reprographics (425) 882- 2600 in Bellevue, Litho Design (206) 574-3000 and Reprographics NW/Ford Graphics {206) 624-2040. All Plans and Attachments must be folded to 8Yz" by 11" REVIEW PROCESS: Once the final short plat information is submitted to the Planning Division, the materials will be routed to those City departments having an interest in the application. Reviewers have approximately two weeks to return their comments to the Planning Division. All comments and any requests for revisions will be sent to the applicant. Once all comments have been addressed, the applicant re-submits the revised plans and/or documents for review. As part of the review process, the Planning Division will ensure improvements have been installed and approved and that all conditions of the short plat approval have been met. Once the applicant has demonstrated these items have been addressed through either a confirmation of improvement installation approval or letter of deferral, the City will send a written request for the final mylar, courier fees and any associated legal documents. Once all of the City's required approval signatures have been obtained, the City will transmit the mylar via courier to King County for recording. The entire recording process takes approximately eight weeks to complete. However, the time frame for getting a short plat recorded is largely dependent upon application completeness and prompt turnaround time for revisions. Lots cannot legally be sold until the Short Plat has received its recording number. DEFERRAL OF IMPROVEMENTS: If a developer wishes to defer certain on-site or off-site improvements (i.e. landscaping, curbs and sidewalks), written application with full and complete engineering drawings must be submitted to the Planning Division. The application should explain the reasons why such delay is necessary. If approval is granted, security in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, set-aside fund, assignment of funds, certified check or other type of security acceptable to the City shall be furnished to the City in an amount equal to a minimum of 150% of the estimated cost of the required improvements. 6 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\shplrec.doc Rev:02/2015 DEDICATION OF RIGHT OF WAY: If right-of-way dedication is required for the short plat, separate application for City approval is required. The associated deed of right-of-way dedication must be approved prior to recording of the short plat. This process may take six weeks, so early application is encouraged. 7 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\shplrec.doc Rev: 02/2015 Renton Church of the Nazarene 850 Union Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 MBP Integration MBP Integration Stephen Chow 862 Bremerton Ave NE Renton, WA 98059 Chad Allen Encompass Engineering & Surveying 16S NE Juniper St lssaauah, WA 98027 Peter St Pierre Forest Contracting, Inc. 27018 233rd Pl SE Maple Valley, WA 98038 Tom Redding Encompass Engineering & Surveying 165 NE Juniper St, Suite 201 lssaauah, WA 98027 losif Mishkov 2471 S 224th St Des Moines. WA 98198 Peter St Pierre Pacific Peak Construction Services Inc 4004 NE 19th St Renton. WA 98056 RentonO NOTICE TACT THE CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF FOR Ft.iRTHE~l~S~~~'i.~l6~~~1i0~EVELOPMENT AT /425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Pl.EASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WtlEN CAW NG FOIi PROPER fll.l.lDENT1FICATION, I CERTIFICATION I, C l,1rJ2..,c. /f, Cl-oSC , hereby certify that ? copies oft he above document were posted in ----1.._ conspicuous places or nearby the described property on Date :_---.::.6'-'h::cc,,:.-,/J'--'-l-==!:>----- ST ATE OF WASHINGTON 55 COUNTY OF KING Signed:__J<ffer1~~:..t..tf'-~,L.C4&.~==::=---- lie in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print): My appointment expires.· __ _,_A-......,.1 ,'+· ,,_,,... ,_5 ....,_---'.)"'--'<j~...J,)"'-'c"-1-":;,'----- '.j ( Agencies Team Properties Paul Grudhoffer 300' Surrounding Properties (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ) ) ss ) See Attached Owner Contact/ Applicant See Attached "''""" 1 1111 .::-''" \.. '{ Poi,;11,, ff .... o~,'1~''•,,,,~"'?.'',, -..... ,.., ~+11, u\ ~ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Sabrina Mirante ff f~-+0T<1,t" ~\ ~ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary ~f'for th.e..useii,d r,iiirposes .,,,. ""' .. ., mentioned in the instrument. ~ ~ % "'"a\.,c. J ~ :3 "-~ ... 1-0-~ ,,., 1111,;"·29-' ,,,.$" -= Dated: "1, ~ 0 1111,,1\\\,,, ... , ~0 ..... {: Notary (Print):. ___ \k"""'"'\'4~ ____ ?__,......:;etv,;z:· """'"'"'"'M=-'------------ My appointment expires: f;?,.,, _; -... 0 ..._ ~ . , _ Q ~<'" Q<f I I ~ (-::, ATS Automation Expansion LUAlS-000478, ECF, SA-A template. affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology ** Environmental Review Section PO Box47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region ' Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers "' Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers*** Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 35030 SE Douglas St. #210 Snoqualmie, WA 98065 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Timothy C. Croll, Attn: SEPA Responsible Official 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology** Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept.** Attn: Misty Blair Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box47703 39015 -172'' Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office* Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program** 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Laura Murphy Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172'' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program** Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Erin Slaten Ms. Shirley Marroquin 39015 172"d Avenue SE 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 WDFW -Larry Fisher• Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Gretchen Kaehler Issaquah, WA 98027 PO Box48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Tim McHarg Attn: Acting Community Dev. Director Director of Community Development 220 Fourth Avenue South 12835 Newcastle Way, Ste 200 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Newcastle, WA 98056 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Wendy Weiker, Community Svcs. Mgr. Jack Pace, Responsible Official 355110th Ave NE 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Mailstop EST llW Tukwila, WA 98188 Bellevue, WA 98004 Puget Sound Energy Doug Corbin, Municipal liaison Mgr. 6905 South 228'" St Kent, WA 98032 *Note: lfthe Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS"1 the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. **Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT1 & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov ** Karen Walter, Laura Murphy and Erin Slaten with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. are emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email addresses: KWalter@muckleshoot.nsn.us / Laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us L erin.slaten@muckleshoot.nsn.us ***Department of Natural Resources is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT1 & Notice the following email address: sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov template -affidavit of service by mailing 7840800265 7841300225 7841300370 BANASKY GEORGE C BAREI BENNETI LOUIS+DRIUSSI RITA BAUTISTA FLAVIANO P+NANCY S 415 MORRIS AVES 614 S 18TH ST 505 MORRIS AVES RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98056 7841300275 1823059052 7841300390 BECK HEIDI A BNSF BROOKS MICHAEL L+JEANETIE E 512 WHITWORTH AVES PO BOX 961089 520 SHATIUCK AVES RENTON, WA 98057 FORT WORTH, TX 76161 RENTON, WA 98055 7840800170 7841300220 7841300450 CAYCE KAMERON C+TERRI CLAREY RICK G+STEPHANIE A CLARKE EUGENE C 29013 229TH AVE SE 419 WHITWORTH AVES 525 WHITWORTH S BLACK DIAMOND, WA 98010 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 7841300456 7841300457 7841300245 DAVID MARNA LEE DAVID MARNA LEE DEACY HAROLD A 918 ST ROCH AVE 521 Whitworth Ave S 407 WHITWORTH AVES NEW ORLEANS, LA 70117 Renton, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 7840800225 7841300255 9228900070 DEWITI MARK+TANYA DONCKERS LOUIS F SR DSB COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES L PO BOX 59763 447 MORRIS AVES 95 S TOBIN ST SUITE 201 RENTON, WA 98058 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98905 9228900070 9228900070 9228900070 DSB COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES L DSB COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES L DSB COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES L 95 S TOBIN ST SUITE 201 241 S 4th Pl Suite B 235 S 4th Pl RENTON, WA 98905 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 7841300215 7840800260 7840800215 FAKHARZADEH M HADI FIORETII GENE M FISHER FAMILY TRUST PO BOX 78404 9500 S 198TH ST 416 WHITWORTH AVES SEATILE, WA 98178 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98057 1823059266 1823059136 1823059266 FRIEDMAN HENRY+SANDRA FRIEDMAN HENRY+SANDRA FRIEDMAN HENRY+SANDRA 8803 SE 78TH ST 8803 SE 78TH ST 534 Rainier Ave S MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 Renton, WA 98057 7840800175 7840800210 7841300465 GION VERA K HALLOWAY CAROLYN M HENDERSON JIM+JILL 1414 MONROE AVE NE #236 414 WHITWORTH AVES 14922 63RD DR SE RENTON, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98055 SNOHOMISH, WA 98296 7840800220 7841300460 7840800230 HIGGINS ROSE HOLMES ROBERT A SR+ TAMARA J KENNON BRIAN 417 WHITWORTH AVES 5320 NE 26TH ST 5407 13TH AVES RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98059 SEATILE, WA 98108 7841300360 7841300270 7841300375 KLEPACH FRANCES M KRAMER RANDALL E KUNOVSKY ALAN 515 MORRIS AVES 23319 SE 266TH ST 8441 SE 68TH ST #221 RENTON, WA 98057 MAPLE VALLEY, WA 98038 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 7841300375 7841300140 7841300265 KUNOVSKY ALAN LONG DAVID LY HUNG+NGAN NGUYEN 411 S 5th St 408 SHATIUCK AVES 504 WHIWORTH AVES Renton, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 7841300395 7841300395 7841300130 LYNCH MICHAEL D LYNCH MICHAEL D MAFFEO ENOCH V 526 SHATIUCK AVES 526 SHATIUCK AVES 400 SHATIUCK AVES RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 7841300230 7841300206 7841300385 MCALPINE JERROLD D ll+ALISA MCLAUGHLIN RYAN & SHANNON REDDA AMANUEL 415 WHITWORTH AVES 24503 146TH PL SE PO B0X28057 RENTON, WA 98057 KENT, WA 98042 SEATILE,WA 98118 7841300385 7841300280 Resident REDDA A MANUEL REPPAS TROY CHARLES 530 Rainier Ave S 516 Shattuck Ave S APT 201 516 WHITWORTH AVES Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 1823059266 1823059266 1823059266 Resident Resident Resident 520 Rainier Ave S 532 Rainier Ave S 536 Rainier Ave S Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 1823059266 7840800255 9228900070 Resident Resident Resident 538 Rainier Ave S 419 Morris Ave S 221 S 4th Pl Suite A Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 9228900070 9228900070 9228900070 Resident Resident Resident 229 S 4th Pl Suite B 221 S 4th Pl 205 S 4th Pl Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 9228900070 9228900070 9228900070 Resident Resident Resident 241 S 4th Pl Suite A 231 S 4th Pl 241 S 4th Pl Suite C Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 9228900070 9228900070 9228900070 Resident Resident Resident 221 S 4th Pl Suite B 221 S 4th Pl Suite B2 229 S 4th Pl Suite A Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 9228900070 9228900070 9228900070 Resident Resident Resident 241 S 4th Pl Suite D 207 S 4th Pl 233 S 4th Pl Renton, VVA 98057 Renton, VVA 98057 Renton, VVA 98057 9228900070 9228900070 9228900070 Resident Resident Resident 217 S 4th Pl 203 S 4th Pl 229 S 4th Pl Renton, VVA 98057 Renton, VVA 98057 Renton, VVA 98057 9228900070 9228900070 7841300260 Resident Resident RYAN MARY PATRICA 221 S 4th Pl Suite C 241 S 4th Pl 123 MAIN AVES Renton, VVA 98057 Renton, VVA 98057 RENTON, VVA 98057 7841300260 7841300470 7841300145 RYAN MARY PATRICA RYAN MARY PATRICIA SHERIDAN PHILIP J 500 Whitworth Ave S APT D 123 MAIN AVE S 2016 S LUCILE ST Renton, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 SEATTLE, VVA 98108 7841300380 1823059118 7840800235 SODERBERG SUSAN C TENNESSEE GROUP LLC TORKELSON EDVVARD R 303 HOUSER VV AY S 715 LIND AVES 11006 RAINIER AVES RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, VVA 98055 SEATTLE, WA 98178 7841300155 7840800250 7841300235 TRAXEL DE WHITLOCK RAFORD LEON WILLEY KAYSER OLAF 418 SHATTUCK AVES 425 MORRIS AVES 409 WHITWORTH AVES RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, VVA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 ATS AUTOMATION 450 Shattuck Ave S Renton. WA 98055 Team Properties, LLC 450 Shattuck Aves Renton, WA 98057-2427 PAUL GRUNDHOFFER WEAVER ARCHITECTS 1411 4th Ave, 810 Seattle, WA 98101 STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on June 26, 2015. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $98.00. / / /~1i;f ;jf;J .2,(,!7,, ,::'.,Linda Mills Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter Subscribed and sworn to me this 26th day of June, 2015. ktSlu!#-~ K.C. Sherman, Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Buckley, Washington ''''''""","'' ~,,, -o -lin ~ ,;:--. ·( .;;~"'-~ : . -. i::Jf .. t,r, I Ii' ,2 ·':.v{, ,.:-'.'-~':'\.:,;;;1111, <.:.:..<;:::, ''1; :I..('.:,_S'<·S\0•\: €':11; '/T ·'I = ,...._ .~ .. l~':) -·r;.:::,'11.? 1,. ::: ~ ;-~· 0 \Air, ";.-',~ "9. ~ ,;:: ~ :::0 ~ ,,_ ~~-7.-1 ~ ?· \''~ -~ :;:: ...... u -• -(fj:,-,, ~ ~ ~ ~ % <f>\, '°UF,\:'-' j < t ~ r ·11 4 i .. , t -0 ~ 0 ·-·'I; "1r '111: ~, ::i-" ... ~ .... -/..:. = 11 1 -.(;:" 'llH\w:·:,-.:;,.; -~" ..:~ 111 OF 111 r. c:Y..\' ,.:.:."::' 1111 ~ ~ ,,...:::1 ................... I I\\\\\\\\\."-'~''...._ NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Dctenni- nation of NonSignificance Miti- gated (DNSM) for the following project under the authority of the Renton municipal code. Campbell Short Plat LUA 15000239 Location: SW comer of the in- tersection of NE 9th St and Anacortes Ave NE. SW corner of the intersection of NE 9th St and Anacortes Ave NE (APN 1023059095). The applicant is requesting approval of a 21ot short plat. The lots range in size from 7,912 sf to 13,445 sf. The site contains a 57,434 sf critical area tract with a Cate- gory 2 wetland and a 1.807 sf shared driveway tract for ac- cess. The density is 4.08 du/ac Halfstreet frontage improve- ments will be completed along NE 9th St Appeals of the DNSM must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on July 10, 2015. Appeals must be filed in v.rriting together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner c/o City Clerk, City of Renton, I 055 S Grady Way, Renton. WA 98057 Appeals to the Hearing Examiner are governed by RMC 48 l IO and more information may be ob- tained from the Renton City Clerk's Office. 425-430-6510. Published in the Renton Reporter on June 26. 2015. #1350587. On the 26th day of June, 2015, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing SEPA Determination and Notice documents. This information was sent to: Agencies Parties of Record Tom Redding Renton Church of the Nazarene Peter St. Pierre (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING mentioned in the instrument. Dated: See Attached See Attached Contact Owner Applicant /! ,· Notary (Print): ___ -'-'k-"-1, '""I~""-'-'''-'"'"""" w=-'-e,.,, ,.,_· ·------------- My appointment expires: ,LU 1 .-, a -,rl( '.:Z-f' V-Q U')f O' I I '7<./ f Campbell Short Plat LUAlS-000239, ECF, SHPL-A template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology ** Environmental Review Section PO Box47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region * Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers* Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers*** Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 35030 SE Douglas St. #210 Snoqualmie, WA 98065 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Timothy C. Croll, Attn: SEPA Responsible Official 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 AGENCY {DOE) LETTER MAILING {ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology '' Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. ** Attn: Misty Blair Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box47703 39015 -172nd Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office* Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program ** 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Laura Murphy Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program** Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Erin Slaten Ms. Shirley Marroquin 39015 172"' Avenue SE 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 WDFW -Larry Fisher' Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Gretchen Kaehler Issaquah, WA 98027 PO Box48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Tim McHarg Attn: Acting Community Dev. Director Director of Community Development 220 Fourth Avenue South 12835 Newcastle Way, Ste 200 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Newcastle, WA 98056 Puget Sound Energy City a/Tukwila Wendy Weiker, Community Svcs. Mgr. Jack Pace, Responsible Official 355 110'" Ave NE 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Mailstop EST llW Tukwila, WA 98188 Bellevue, WA 98004 Puget Sound Energy Doug Corbin, Municipal liaison Mgr. 6905 South 228'" St Kent, WA 98032 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. **Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov ** Karen Walter, Laura Murphy and Erin Slaten with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. are emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT1 & Notice to the following email addresses: KWalter@muckleshoot.nsn.us / Laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us L erin.slaten@muckleshoot.nsn.us ***Department of Natural Resources Is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT1 & Notice the following email address: sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov template -affidavit of service by mailing Renton Church of the Nazarene 850 Union Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 MBP Integration MBP Integration Stephen Chow 862 Bremerton Ave NE Renton. WA 98059 Chad Allen Encompass Engineering & Surveying 165 NE Juniper St lssaauah, WA 98027 Peter St Pierre Forest Contracting, Inc. 27018 233rd Pl SE Maple Valley, WA 98038 Tom Redding Encompass Engineering & Surveying 165 NE Juniper St, Suite 201 lssaauah, WA 98027 losif Mishkov 2471 S 224th St Des Moines. WA 98198 Peter St Pierre Pacific Peak Construction Services Inc 4004 NE 19th St Renton, WA 98056 •-----Denis Law • f _ _:M:ayar _____ .....,tR@]rn)J. O\ June 26, 2015 Tom Redding Encompass Engineering & Surveying 165 Juniper St Issaquah, WA 98027 Community & Economic Development Department C.E. "Chip"Vincent, Administrator SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPAi THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Campbell Short Plat, 15-000239, ECF, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Redding: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance. Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report, for more information. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on July 10, 2015, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, {425) 430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. If you have any further questions, please call me at (425) 430-7289. For the Environmental Review Committee, Clark H. Close Associate Planner Enclosure cc: Renton Church of the Nazarene/ Owner(s) Peter St. Pierre, Forest Contracting/ Applicant Stephen Chow, losif Mishkov / Party(ies) of Record Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Denis Law c· f - ___ M:ay:or ______ .. r lty O l 1.~' rrru! rt June 26, 2015 Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPAi THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on June 22, 2015: SEPA DETERMINATION: Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) PROJECT NAME: Campbell Short Plat PROJECT NUMBER: LUAlS-000239, ECF, SHPL-A Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on July 10, 2015, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have questions, please call me at {425} 430-7289. For the Environmental Review Committee, Clark H. Close Assistant Planner Enclosure cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Boyd Powers, Department of Natural Resources Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, NW Region Larry Fisher, WDFW Duwamish Tribal Office US Army Corp. of Engineers Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUN, 1 Y AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA} DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: -MITIGATED (DNS-M} LUAlS-000239, ECF, SHPL·A Peter St. Pierre, Forest Contracting, Inc. Campbell Short Plat PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of a 2-lot short plat of a vacant 1.92-acre parcel for the future development of 2 single-family homes. The site is located within the Residential-8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zone. The proposed lots range in size from 7,912 SF to 13,445 SF in area with an average lot size of 10,679 SF. The site contains a 57,434 SF critical area tract (Tract A) and would. include a 1,807 SF shared driveway (Tract B). The residential density is 4.08 dwelling units per net acre. Access to the site is via a single shared driveway from NE 9th St. Half-street frontage improvements will be completed along NE 9th St. The site includes a 26,107 SF onsite critical area (Category 2 wetland), in the south westerly portion of the property, requiring a SO-foot buffer. There are 172 trees onsite. The applicant is proposing to retain 142 trees within the critical areas and buffers and 11 trees throughout the rest of the site. The site generally slopes down to the southwest at approximately 10%. A combination of full and basic dispersion will be used, discharging towards the onsite wetland. The applicant has submitted an Arborist Report, Wetland Reconnaissance, Geotechnical Engineering Study, and a Preliminary Technical Information Report. PROJECT LOCATION: LEAD AGENCY: SW corner of the intersection of NE 9th and Anacortes Ave NE City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030{2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-9-070D Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on July 10, 2015. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUI\,,, V AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: June 26, 2015 June 22, 2015 -=------=~~µtl/µ'tz/lUJ-1> P 1-/15 Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Community Services Department Date bMt'i>' " +BLv~ ftJ)~-t,lP2[-, ,(C~hip" incent, Administrator Date fl, Department of Community & Economic Development 0/2 z//5 j -J Date DEPARTMENT OF CO ..... IUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT --------tenton ® PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) MITIGATION MEASURES AND ADVISORY NOTES 15-000239, ECF, SHPL-A Peter St. Pierre, Forest Contracting Campbell Short Plat PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of a 2-lot short plat of a vacant 83,428 square foot {1.92 acres) parcel for the future development of 2 single-family homes. The site is located at the SW corner of the intersection of NE 9th St and Anacortes Ave NE {APN 1023059095) within the Residential-8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zone. The proposed lots range in size from 7,912 SF to 13,445 SF in area with an average lot size of 10,679 SF. The site will also contain a critical area tract (Tract A) that is 57,434 SF and a shared driveway (Tract B) that is 1,807 SF. The residential density is 4.08 dwelling units per net acre. Access to the site is via a single shared driveway from NE 9th St. Half-street frontage improvements will be completed along NE 9th St. The site includes a 26,107 SF onsite critical area (Category 2 wetland), in the south westerly portion of the property, requiring a SO-foot buffer. There are 172 trees onsite. The applicant is proposing to retain 142 trees within the critical areas and buffers and 11 trees throughout the rest of the site. The site generally slopes down to the southwest at approximately 10%. A combination of full and basic dispersion will be used, discharging towards the onsite wetland. The applicant has submitted an Arborist Report, Wetland Reconnaissance, Geotechnical Engineering Study, and a Preliminary Technical Information Report with the application. PROJECT LOCATION: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: SW CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF NE 9TH AND ANACORTES AVE NE The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee(ERC) has issued a Determination of Nonsignificance {DNS). ADIVISORY NOTES: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the oppeol process for the land use actions. enitoe~i;inil~~y1ew1~t1m'm~nt1111mim1m1 1m1:r{~mr~fiW~~~liill1i~~r11~2~~llllfzI~z1,11~virilmijo~~f@t~'11t1i11~irs1i~!li Recommendations: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER Water service will be provided by the City of Renton. SEWER Sewer service will be provided by the City of Renton. STORM There is no formal storm conveyance system in NE 7th Street. STREETS There are no frontage improvements. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER The proposed development is within the City's water service area and in the Highlands 565 hydraulic zone. The development is outside of the City's aquifer protection areas. There is an existing 8 inch water main (see City water project plan no. W 2107) in NE 9th St. The 8 inch line can deliver 2,000 gallons per minute (gpm). The static water pressure is about 63 psi at elevation of 416 feet. There is an existing fire hydrant at the southwest corner of NE 9th St and Bremerton Ave NE which can deliver 1,000 gallons per minute. The hydrant is more than 300 feet away from the new southerly lot. The following water improvements will be required to provide water service for domestic use and for fire protection for the subject development: 1. Installation of 1 inch minimum domestic water service line and meter to each lot. 2. Installation of an additional fire hydrant within 300 feet of each lot if required by Renton Fire Prevention Department and/or if the proposed single family dwellings will exceed 3,600 sq ft of gross area. 3. The development is subject to applicable water system development charges and water meter installations fee based on the size of the meters. 4. Civil plans for the water main extension will be required. SANITARY SEWER 1. Sewer service is provided by the City of Renton. There is an existing 8 inch sewer main in NE 9TH Street. The applicant can connect directly to the 8 inch main sewer at NE 9TH street. 2. The development is subject to a wastewater system development charge (SDC) fee. The SDC fee for sewer is based on the size of the new domestic water to serve the new home on each lot. The sewer fee for a Y. inch or 1 inch meter install is $2,135.00. 3. This parcel is subject to a Special Assessment District. The East Renton Interceptor fee is $316.80 per lot. Payment of these fees will be required prior to issuance of the utility construction permit. 4. All plats shall provide separate side sewer stubs to each building lot prior to recording of the plat. SURFACE WATER 1. A drainage plan and drainage report dated April 7, 2015 was submitted by Encompass Engineering and surveying. The proposed 2 lot subdivision, zoned R 8, is subject to Full Drainage Review in accordance with the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWM, Chapters 1 and 2. Based on the City's flow control map, this site falls within the Flow Control Duration Standard, Forested Condition. Flow control BMPS required for this project per City of Renton Amendments to King County Storm Water Design Manual section 1.2.3.3. 2. The submitted drainage report includes the 8 core requirements, but includes only 5 special requirements. The special requirement #6 regarding aquifer protection area needs to be included in the ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 2 of 7 ;;~ijgin~rc l<vazdid!\fis drainage report (TIR) submitted with the utility construction permit. 3. Water quality is not required for this project per King County Storm Water Design Manual Amended by City of Renton section 1.2.8. Since the total proposed PGIS is less than 5000SF. 4. Full dispersion is proposed in the plans for lot 1 and tract A and basic dispersion/limited infiltration is proposed for lot 2. Full dispersion, basic dispersion and limited infiltration must be designed and located per City of Renton Amendments to King County Storm Water Design Manual sections C.2.1 and C.2.4 and 5.4. Detention is not required for this project per King County Storm Water Design Manual Amended by City of Renton since the development of this project will result in less than 0.1 CFS increase of the 100 year runoff. 5. A geotechnical report, dated March 11, 2015 was submitted by Geospectrum Consultants Inc. The field study included 4 exploration pits on thel.92 acre site. These exploration pits were dug up to 6.5 feet in native's soil. No ground water was encountered on exploration pits number 1, 2 and 3 but seepage was observed at 2.5 foot. Fill soils encountered in exploration pit number 3 about 3 foot. Soil type encountered is Glaciation Till (QGT). The geotechnical report recommended full dispersion, basic dispersion and limited infiltration methods for BMP. The geotechnical report recommends full dispersion for lot 1, tract Band basic dispersion/limited infiltration for lot 2. 6. Surface water system development fee is $1,350.00 per new lot. Fees are payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. TRANSPORTATION/STREET 1. Existing right of way width in NE 9th Street is 30 feet. This street has been identified as a residential access street. To meet the City's new complete street standards, street improvements fronting this site will include 16 feet of pavement, an 8 foot planter strip, 5 foot sidewalk, 0.5 foot curb, and gutter. 2. A 20 feet wide joint access/utility easement road proposed. Lots 1 and 2 will get access via this road. 3. Traffic Impact Fees, Transportation impact fee is applicable on single family houses based on the applicable rate at the time of building permit, and payment is due at the time of issuance of the building permit. 4. The current transportation impact fee rate is $2,214.44 per new single family home. The transportation impact fee that is current at the time of building permit application will be levied. Payment of the transportation impact fee is due at the time of issuance of the building permit. 5. To meet the City's new complete street standards, street improvements fronting this site will include 16 feet of pavement, an 8 foot planter strip, 5 foot sidewalk, 0.5 foot curb, and gutter. 6. All electrical, phone, and cable services and lines serving the proposed development must be underground. The construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton inspector prior to recording the plat. 7. Mailbox locations shall be approved by the Post Office. 8. Paving and trench restoration will comply with the City's Trench Restoration and Overlay Requirements. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Separate permits and fees for water, sewer and storm connections will be required. 2. All construction utility permits for drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. A licensed Civil Engineer shall prepare the civil plans. ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 3 of 7 E11gine~ri11g·R.~11f~J&~om . k azdiilcicist@renfl:l'fiwa:~ 3. Rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height will be require a separate building permit. Structural calculations and plans shall be submitted for review by a licensed engineer. Special Inspection is required. 4. A tree removal and tree retention/protection plan and a separate landscape plan shall be included with the civil plan submittal. PLAN REVIEW RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. Flow control BMPS required for this project per City of Renton Amendments to King County Storm Water Design Manual section 1.2.3.3. 2. A City of Renton Public Utility easement is required over the entire private road. 3. The special requirement #6 regarding aquifer protection areas should be included in the drainage report submitted with the utility construction permit. 4. Foundation of new building must penetrate through the existing fill to bear on undisturbed very dense/hard natural soils. Building must have conventional spread footing to support the proposed structures. 5. Planter strip must be continued to proposed driveway. 6. Existing sidewalk at eastside of proposed driveway (Northeast corner) must be removed and relocated to align with proposed sidewalk at west side of proposed driveway. 7. Luminaire pole located at corner of Anacortes Ave NE and NE 9th St must be relocated to proposed planter strip at corner of Anacortes Ave NE and NE 9th ST. ~1[rel!Rev1e111tJ;'ij11i1diilg1;B'mment$,1111,11111r4r~$l · ore!'rnbm~~ll~~~1~i.(iz~:·,g5Q'm.,'~'@s.~nt9'nw.a, ·'1Ji/i111 Recommendations: Environmental Impact Comments: 1. The fire impact fees are currently applicable at the rate of $495.10 per single family unit. Code Related Comments: 1. The fire flow requirement for a single family home is 1,000 gpm minimum for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet (including garage and basements). If the dwelling exceeds 3,600 square feet, a minimum of 1,500 gpm fire flow would be required. A minimum of one fire hydrant is required within 300 feet of the proposed buildings and two hydrants if the fire flow goes up to 1,500 gpm. Existing hydrants can be counted toward the requirements as long as they meet current code including 5 inch storz fittings. A minimum of one new hydrant shall be required as there are no hydrants within 300 feet of Lot 2. 2. Fire department apparatus access roadways are required to be a minimum of 20 feet wide fully paved, with 25 feet inside and 45 feet outside turning radius. Fire access roadways shall be constructed to support a 30 ton vehicle with 75 psi point loading. Access is required within 150 feet of all points on the buildings. Recommendations: Street trees -use only species that will achieve a large mature size and not Persica parrotia. Use only two street trees spaced 50' on-center and 30' from street light. Reduce proposal from four street trees to two. Parks impact fees per Ordinance 5670 applies. ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 4of 7 Recommendations: Minimal impact on police services. JLl'l~ffl)iiiilI!!~i~W:cO:mmiibts'ill!l!!mll!!W!W' •1:,1,'11mm:icl1;,,.{I' .1,:,,!1H!~l~cm11~!0:I~i!l!lh'J~r§*4~1l7~~~9Jc:a1~$~·@r~i-ftiinw~Jgc,v. Recommendations: 1. RMC section 4 4 030.C.2 limits haul hours between eight thirty (8:30) a.m. and three thirty (3:30) p.m., Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 2. New single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays is by permission only. No work is permitted on Sundays. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plants appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 4. A National Permit Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required when more than one acre is being cleared. tl!i'~ll1hi~~ts~.:· .. :1e~~,'~omh1iif· n, .mi'eiii\ii'.@r~n.oim~/i!iiJW Recommendations: Short Plat: Bob Mac Onie 04/30/2015 Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA15 000239 and LND20 0621, respectively, on the final short plat submittal. The dedication of right of way for short subdivisions requires a separate Deed of Dedication; provide a space to the recording number of same on the short plat. The Deed of Dedication document includes both a legal description exhibit and a map exhibit of the dedicated parcel. The legal description exhibit should be prepared, stamped, dated and signed by the applicant's surveyor. The surveyor should also prepare the map exhibit. The dedication process requires an updated Plat Certificate dated within 45 days of approval of said dedication. Talk to the Project Manager if there are questions or further information is needed. Show on the drawing the second tie to the City of Renton Survey Control Network (Mon #1849), and note what was found. Also note Monument Number 1848 on the drawing (lower left hand corner of the short plat submittal). Both of these monuments are noted under the "RENTON CONTROL MONUMENTS" block, but are not specifically referenced on the drawing. Provide sufficient information to determine how the plat boundary was established. Provide short plat and lot closure calculations. Note on the short plat drawing what was set at the corners of the proposed lots. Currently, what was set is noted under the "LEGEND" block, but the symbol is not shown on the drawing. Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if any. The city will provide addresses for the proposed lots as soon as possible. Note said addresses on the final short plat drawing. Note all easements, covenants and agreements of record on the drawing. A 17.5 foot easement recorded under Rec. No. 8006240435 (shown along the south line of Tract A and Lot 2 of the subject short plat) is said "to be vacated" (in the future?). This transmission/distribution line was granted to Puget Sound Power in 1980. Is said easement to be vacated before the short plat is ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 5 o/7 A 10 foot utility easement, recorded under Rec No. 8109020545 for City of Renton utilities, is shown along the north line ofTract A and Lot 1 of said short plat. It is noted that said easement was not noted on the underlying Lot Line Adjustment recorded under Rec No. 200402129000008. A 1 foot utility easement, recorded under Rec No 4043986 for Puget Sound Power, is also shown along the north line of said Tract A and said Lot l, but was not noted on said underlying Lot Line Adjustment. Remove all point designations ("WF17", "WF18", etc.) shown on Tract A. Remove all catch basin information, sanitary sewer manhole information, gas lines, water lines, sewer lines, sidewalks, vertical curbs, etc. from the short plat submittal. Said data is not relevant for short plat recording. Note any relevant researched resources on the short plat submittal. Note that the property to the west of the subject short plat is "UNPLATIED". Remove the building setbacks lines. Setbacks will be determined when building permits are issued. The City of Renton Administrator, Public Works Department, is the only city official who signs the final short plat. Provide an appropriate approval block and signature line. Pertinent King County approval blocks also need to be noted on the drawing. Include a declaration block on the drawing, titled "OWNERS' DECLARATION" not "CERTIFICATION" or other. All vested owner(s) of the subject final short plat need to sign the final short plat drawing. Include notary blocks as needed. The Ticor Title Company title report, per Guarantee/Certificate No. 70020273, dated March 18, 2015, states that the subject short plat site is vested in Fred and Donna Alberts. The City of Renton Land Use Permit Master Application notes the Renton Church of the Nazerene as the property owner. The short plat submittal notes Pacific Peak Construction Review as the property owner (per Contract). Review all and resolve as needed. Remove the Property Owner, Engineer/Surveyor, Zoning, Proposed Net Density and Max. Allowable Density data from the right hand side of the subject submittal. Remove the City of Renton "SEAL" from the upper right hand corner of the submittal. The "VICINITY MAP" notes "MONROE AVE NE" to the west of the subject site. Said street should be noted as "UNION AVE NE". "UNION AVE NE" is shown east of the subject site and south of NE 4th St. It appears that NE 4th St is placed too close (on the map) under the subject site. Add a north arrow to the "VICINITY MAP". Review and alter as needed. Because the subject property falls within Zone 2 of the City of Renton Aquifer Protection Area, the Aquifer Protection Notice needs to be noted on the drawing. AQUIFER PROTECTION NOTICE The lots created herein fall within Zone 2 of Renton's aquifer protection area and are subject to the requirements of the City of Renton Ordinance #4367. This city's sole source of drinking water is supplied from a shallow aquifer under the city surface. There is no natural barrier between the water table and ground surface. Extreme care should be exercised when handling of any liquid substance other than water to protect from contact with the ground surface. It is the homeowner's responsibility to protect the city's drinking water. Note that if there are easements, restrictive covenants or agreements to others (City of Renton, etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the final short plat. The final short plat drawing and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. The ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 6 of 7 recording number(s) for the associated document(s) are to be referenced on the final short plat drawing. Provide spaces for the recording numbers thereof. The new easements for ingress, egress, utilities, etc. shown for the benefit of future owners of the proposed lots each need a note defining the rights associated with the easement at issue. Since these new "proposed" easements shown aren't "granted and conveyed" until the benefited and/or burdened lots are conveyed to others add the following language on the face of the short plat drawing: DECLARATION OF COVENANT: The owners of the land embraced within this short plat, in return for the benefit to accrue from this subdivision, by signing hereon covenant and agree to convey the beneficial interest in the new private easements shown on this short plat to any and all future purchasers of the lots, or of any subdivisions thereof. This covenant shall run with the land as shown on this short plat. The preceding statement obligates the seller of the lots created to "expressly grant and convey" the lots "together with and/or subject to" any new private easements delineated on the short plat in the conveying document. The private ingress, egress and utility easement require a "New Private Easement for Ingress, Egress and Utilities Maintenance Agreement" statement. Include the following statement on the short plat: NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT The Native Growth Protection Easement (NPGE) on this short plat identifies the steep slopes. The creation of the Easement conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the Easement Area. This interest shall be for the purpose of preserving native vegetation for the control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, visual and aural buffering, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The Easement imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the Easement area enforceable on behalf of the public by the City of Renton, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the Easement area. The vegetation with the Easement area may not be cut, pruned covered by fill, removed or damaged without express written permission from the City of Renton, provided however, that the owners of underlying property may install landscaping. The right of entry herein shall apply to the agents, representatives and employees of the owners or subsequent owners of the underlying property. ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 7 of 7 ---------RentOfl 0 OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: campbell Short Plat PROJECT NUMBER: LUA15-000239, ECF, SHPL-A LOCATION: SW corner of the intersection of NE 9th and Anacortes Ave NE DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of a 2-lot short plat of a vacant 83A28 square foot (1.92 acres) parcel for the future development of 2 single-family homes. The site is located at the SW corner of the intersection of NE 9th St and Anacortes Ave NE (APN 1023059095) within the Residential-8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zone. The proposed lots range in size from 7,912 SF to 13,445 SF in area with an average lot size of 10,679 SF. The site will also contain a critical area tract (Tract A) that is 57,434 SF and a shared driveway (Tract B) that is 1,807 SF. The residential density is 4.08 dwelling units per net acre. Access to the site Is vfa a single shared driveway from NE 9th St. Half-street frontage improvements will be completed along NE 9th St. The site includes a 26,107 SF onsite critical area (Category 2 wetland), in the south westerly portion of the property, requiring a SO-foot buffer. There are 172 trees onsite. The applicant is proposing to retain 142 trees within the critical areas and buffers and 11 trees throughout the rest of the site. The site generally slopes down to the southwest at approximately 10%. A combination of full and basic dispersion will be used, discharging towards the onsite wetland. The applicant has submitted an Arborist Repon, Wetland Reconnaissance, Geotechnical Engineering Study, and a Preliminary Technical Information Repon with the application. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION HAS PROBABLE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS THAT CAN BE MITIGATED THROUGH MITIGATION MEASURES. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on July 10, 2015, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT of ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT AND CONCURRENCE ,,, /_I<;/!> ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION DATE NAME 1Nm41 JOATE . ERC MEETING DATE: Project Nome: Project Number: Pro1ect Manager: Owner Applicant: Contoct: Project Locotion: Project Summory: Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Area: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: June 22, 2015 r./' J (',<_ /A'ff_ I , 11~/11- Ill.',·) I kc? .·l i _;, __ -,,.,... j :::, Campbell Short Plat ~ e&~l'->-Wl -le-,1, Bl•<: LUAlS-000239, ECF, SHPL-A Clark H. Close, Associate Planner Renton Church of the Nazarene, PO Box 2640, Renton WA 98056 Peter St. Pierre, Forest Contracting LLC, 27018 233'' Pl SE, Maple Valley, WA 98038 Tom Redding, Encompass Engineering & Surveying, 165 NE Juniper St., Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 SW Corner of the interseciton of NE 9'" St and Anacortes Ave NE (APN 1023059095) The applicant is requesting approval of a 2-lot short plat of a vacant 1.92-acre parcel for the future development of 2 single-family homes. The site is located within the Residential-8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zone. The proposed lots range in size from 7,912 SF to 13,445 SF in area with an average lot size of 10,679 SF. The site contains a 57,434 SF critical area tract (Tract A) and would include a 1,807 SF shared driveway (Tract B). The residential density is 4.08 dwelling units per net acre. Access to the site is via a single shared driveway from NE 9th St. Half-street frontage improvements will be completed along NE 9th St. The site includes a 26,107 SF onsite critical area (Category 2 wetland), in the south westerly portion of the property, requiring a SO-foot buffer. There are 172 trees onsite. The applicant is proposing to retain 142 trees within the critical areas and buffers and 11 trees throughout the rest of the site. The site generally slopes down to the southwest at approximately 10%. A combination of full and basic dispersion will be used, discharging towards the onsite wetland. The applicant has submitted an Arborist Report, Wetland Reconnaissance, Geotechnical Engineering Study, and a Preliminary Technical Information Report. N/A 83,428 SF (1.92 acres) Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): Total Building Area GSF: N/A N/A N/A Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Nonsignificance -Mitigated (DNS-M). Project Location Map DEPARTMENT OF COMMUI AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT AND ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION ERC MEETING DATE: Project Name: Project Number: Project Manager: Owner Applicant: Contact: Project Location: Project Summary: Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Area: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: June 22, 2015 Campbell Short Plat LUA15-000239, ECF, SHPL-A Clark H. Close, Associate Planner Renton Church of the Nazarene, PO Box 2640, Renton WA 98056 Peter St. Pierre, Forest Contracting LLC, 27018 233'' Pl SE, Maple Valley, WA 98038 Tom Redding, Encompass Engineering & Surveying, 165 NE Juniper St., Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 SW Corner of the intersection of NE 9" St and Anacortes Ave NE (APN 1023059095) The applicant is requesting approval of a 2-lot short plat of a vacant 1.92-acre parcel for the future development of 2 single-family homes. The site is located within the Residential-8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zone. The proposed lots range in size from 7,912 SF to 13,445 SF in area with an average lot size of 10,679 SF. The site contains a 57,434 SF critical area tract (Tract A) and would include a 1,807 SF shared driveway (Tract B). The residential density is 4.08 dwelling units per net acre. Access to the site is via a single shared driveway from NE 9th St. Half-street frontage improvements will be completed along NE 9th St. The site includes a 26,107 SF onsite critical area (Category 2 wetland), in the south westerly portion of the property, requiring a SO-foot buffer. There are 172 trees onsite. The applicant is proposing to retain 142 trees within the critical areas and buffers and 11 trees throughout the rest of the site. The site generally slopes down to the southwest at approximately 10%. A combination of full and basic dispersion will be used, discharging towards the onsite wetland. The applicant has submitted an Arborist Report, Wetland Reconnaissance, Geotechnical Engineering Study, and a Preliminary Technical Information Report. N/A 83,428 SF (1.92 acres) Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): Total Building Area GSF: N/A N/A N/A Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS). Project Location Map City of Renton Department of Community & _l._ .omic Development CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT SHORT PLAT _nvironmental Review Committee Report LUA15-000239, ECF, SHPL-A Report of June 22, 2015 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ BACKGROUND A. EXHIBITS: ERC Report Preliminary Campbell Short Plat Neighborhood Detail Map Boundary and Topographic Survey Map General Utility Plan Preliminary Tree Retention/Land Clearing Plan Preliminary Landscaping Plan (Ll & L2) Arborist Report prepared by Arborists NW, LLC (dated April 3, 2015) Page 2 of 16 Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 Exhibit 6 Exhibit 7 Exhibit 8 Exhibit 9 Exhibit 10 Exhibit 11 Wetland Reconnaissance prepared by Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC (dated January 29, 2015) Geotechnical Evaluation prepared by Geospectrum Consultants, Inc. (dated March 11, 2015) Preliminary Technical Information Report prepared by Encompass Engineering & Surveying (dated April 7, 2015) Exhibit 12 Exhibit 13 Exhibit 14 Exhibit 15 Wetland Delineation Map Construction Mitigation Description Honey Dew Elementary-Walk to School Route Options Advisory Notes to Applicant B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner(s) of Record: Renton Church of the Nazarene, PO Box 2640, Renton WA98056 2. Zoning Designation: 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential -8 du/ac (R-8) Residential Single Family (RS) Vacant lot, Category 2 wetland 4. Existing Site Use: 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: Location Parcel Number(s) Address( es) Land Use Site 102305-9095 SW Corner of the interseciton of Residential Single Family NE 9th St and Anacortes Ave NE North 556145-0110 4345 NE 9th Pl Residential Single Family 556145-0100 4341 NE 9th Pl 556145-0090 4335 NE 9th Pl 556145-0080 4331 NE 9th Pl South 102305-9121 800 Union Ave NE Residential Single Family West 102305-9078 850 Union Ave NE Residential Single Family East 9510940120 855 Bremerton Ave NE Residential Single Family 9510940130 861 Bremerton Ave NE 9510940180 4451 NE 9th St Zoning Residential-8 Residential-8 Residential-8 Residential-8 Residential-8 6. Access: Access to the short plat is proposed from Main Ave S (102nd Ave SE) to a new on-site public half-street. 7. Site Area: 83,428 SF (1.92 acres) ERC and Short Plat Report -Campbell City of Renton Department of Community & CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT SHORT PLAT Report of June 22, 2015 C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Comprehensive Plan Zoning Interim Zoning Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation #Cl-64 Annexation D. PROJECT NARRATIVE: omic Development Land Use File No. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Ordinance No. 5329 5329 5724 5724 3058 1vironmental Review Committee Report LUAlS-000239, ECF, SHPL-A Page 3 of 16 Date 12/10/2007 12/10/2007 09/22/2014 02/27/2015 09/01/1976 The applicant is requesting Short Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of one parcel of land (King County Assessor's Parcel No. 102305-9095) into two tracts (Critical Area Tract A and Joint Use Driveway Tract B) and two (2) lots for the future construction of 2 single-family residences (Exhibit 2). A short plat is an administrative review process. The subject property is located at the SW Corner of the interseciton of NE 9th St and Anacortes Ave NE, in a portion of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 05 East, W.M., within the Residential-8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zone. The site is currently vacant. The subject site is rectangular in shape (218' wide by 381' long), totaling 83,428 SF {l.92 acres). The property is bordered on the north and east by developed single-family residential lots, on the south by Honey Dew Athletic Fields and to the west by open field behind the Renton Church of Nazarene. The site is well vegetated with primarily alder trees with occasional evergreen trees and understory, such as grasses, salal and blackberries. The site generally slopes down to the southwest at approximately 10%. The proposed lots range in size from 7,912 to 13,445 square feet in area, with an average lot size of 10,679 square feet. The site also contains an on-site critical area tract (Tract A) that is 57,434 SF and would include a shared driveway (Tract B) that is 1,807 square feet. The residential density would be 4.08 dwelling units per net acre (du/ac) after 2,830 square feet of right-of-way dedication. Access to the site is from NE 9th Street. The proposed joint use driveway would be extended to the south property line of Lot 1 for access to both lots (Lot 1 and Lot 2). Half-street frontage improvements will be completed along NE 9th St and Anacortes Ave NE, which includes 2,830 square feet of right-of-way land dedication. The 57,434 square feet {1.32 acre) critical area tract (Category 2 wetland), throughout the central and southwestern portion of the site, requires a SO-foot buffer for that wetland. The applicant is proposing to retain 142 trees within the critical areas and buffers and 11 of the 29 healthy significant trees in the buildable area of the site. The project development will utilize and extend existing public utilities from NE 9th St to each lot. Stormwater runoff from new impervious surfaces would drain to basic dispersion BMPs towards the natural discharge area, the on-site wetland. The primary soil classification encountered at the three test pit location was generally silty fine to very fine sand with occasional gravel, generally suitable for residential development. The grading of the site would consist of excavation of the driveways, excavation of material for the leveling of the building pads and general lot leveling. The excavated material would be removed from the site. The quantities are not known at this time. Grading quantity information would be provided when the engineering plans are provided for review and approval. The applicant submitted a Geotechnical Evaluation prepared by Geospectrum Consultants, Inc., dated March 11, 2015 (Exhibit 10). The report identifies four (4) test pits for the purpose of assessing the soil infiltration feasibility and site development. These exploration pits were dug up to 6 Y, feet in native's soil. No ground water was encountered on exploration pits number 1, 2 and 3 but seepage was observed at 2 Y, feet. Fill soils were encountered in TP-3 located at the northwest quadrant of Lot 1. Fill soils were silty very fine sand with ERC and Short Plat Report -Campbell City of Renton Department of Community & CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT SHORT PLAT Report of June 22, 2015 )mic Development vironmental Review Committee Report LUAlS-000239, ECF, SHPL-A Page 4 of 16 occasional gravel and were only about 3 feet thick at that location. Natural soils encountered at the test pit locations were generally silty fine to very fine sand with occasional gravel, which would allow for limited infiltration on Lots 1 and 2. The natural soils underlying the property are glacial till (Qgt). The Qgt glacial till soils are highly consolidated, heterogeneous mixtures of sand, silt, clay and gravel soils deposited during the advance of the Vashon glaciation. Bearing soils are expected to be encountered at depths ranging from about 3 to 4 feet below the natural ground surface of the site (below any fill soils on the site). The geotechnical report concludes that the site conditions are suitable for the development provided recommendations are followed. According to City of Renton citywide geotechnical critical areas maps, the site exhibits moderate to high landslide hazard characteristics on the western most portion and high seismic hazards. According to the Geotechnical Evaluation, the undisturbed very dense/hard natural glacial till soils encountered should provide good support for the proposed structure foundations. The applicant would be subject to compliance with the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Evaluation prepared by Geospectrum Consultants, Inc. dated March 11, 2015 (or an updated report submitted at a later date) during site and building construction. E. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: Water service will be provided by the City of Renton. b. Sewer: Sewer service will be provided by the City of Renton. c. Surface/Storm Water: There is no formal storm conveyance system in NE 7th Street. 2. Streets: There are no frontage improvements. 3. Police and Fire Protection: City of Renton Police and Fire Departments would provide service. 4. Schools: The site is within the Renton School District. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS with a 14-day Appeal Period B. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Stoff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1. Water a. Wetland, Streams, Lakes Impacts: The applicant submitted a Wetland Reconnaissance prepared by Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC (AOA), dated January 29, 2015. The purpose of the reconnaissance was to confirm that the wetland boundary and classification as delineated by AlderNW (dated December 16, 2008) remained valid. Pursuant to the provided 2008 report, the subject wetland has been classified as a Category 2 wetland throughout the central and southwestern portion of the site. Based on the recent site review by AOA, the surveyed wetland boundary appears to remain accurate and re-delineation did not appear warranted. In addition, the classification of the wetland as a Category II wetland did not change. A wetland classified as Category II requires a standard protective buffer of 50 feet (RMC 4-3-0SOM.6.c). The majority of the existing runoff ERC and Short Plat Report -Campbell City of Renton Department of Community & ~~~,.omic Development CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT Report of June 22, 2015 ,._nvironmental Review Committee Report LUA15-000Z39, ECF, SHPL·A Page 5 of 16 sheet flows southwest towards the on-site wetland. The vegetation within the wetland includes black cottonwood, Oregon ash and red alder trees. The predominate shrub species within the wetland is hard hack spirea. The AlderNW's report indicates that the wetland unit and its buffer (Tract A) have been affected by the existing developments surrounding the property or shows signs of human disturbance. The buffer along the south and west side of the wetland has been affected by previous development including the existing athletic fields and the existing storm water treatment facility extending along the west side of the wetland. The existing developments on the south and west side of the property extends to the limits of the wetlands; this activity likely filled some portion of the subject wetland. The changes caused by past development have created a small island habitat surrounded by the existing urban development. The applicant will designate the wetland, associated buffers, and contiguous pocket areas along the wetland buffer that are not associated with the lots as a Native Growth Protection Area (NGPA) Tract (Tract A). No impacts to existing functions and values of the wetland area are expected as a result of the subject development. The applicant submitted a Preliminary Technical Information Report (TIR) prepared by Encompass Engineering & Surveying (dated April 7, 2015; Exhibit 11). A combination of full and basic dispersion would be used, discharging towards the onsite wetland. Full dispersion is proposed in the plans for lot 1 and tract A and basic dispersion/limited infiltration is proposed for lot 2. Full dispersion, basic dispersion and limited infiltration must be designed and located per City of Renton Amendments to King County Storm Water Design Manual sections C.2.1 and C.2.4 and 5.4. Calculations within the report for the project would be exempt from detention since the development of this project would result in flow control that is less than 0.1 CFS increase of the 100-year runoff. Since the total proposed PGIS is less than 5,000SF, water quality would also not be required for this project per King County Storm Water Design Manual Amended by City of Renton section 1.2.8. Mitigation Measure: No further mitigation recommended. Nexus: N/A C. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant" (Exhibit 15) . ./ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report. PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT REVIEW A. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter z Zoning Districts-Uses and Standards a. Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts b. Section 4-2-060: Zoning Use Table -Uses Allowed in Zoning Designations c. Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards d. Section 4-2-115: Residential Design and Open Space Standards Z. Chapter 3 Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts a. Section 4-3-050: Critical Areas Regulations 3. Chapter 4 City-Wide Property Development Standards a. Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations -General b. Section 4-4-060: Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations c. Section 4-4-130: Tree Retention and Land Clearing Regulations ERC and Short Plat Report -Campbell City of Renton Department of Community & ....... ,., .. omic Development CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT ... nvironmentol Review Committee Report LUAlS-000239, ECF, SHPL-A Report of June 22, 2015 Page 6 of 16 4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards a. Section 4-6-030: Drainage (Surface Water) Standards b. Section 4-6-060: Street Standards 5. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations a. Section 4-7-070: Detailed Procedures for Short Subdivisions b. Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Plan -General Requirements and Minimum Standards c. Section 4-7-150: Streets-General Requirements and Minimum Standards d. Section 4-7-160: Residential Blocks -General Requirements and Minimum Standards e. Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots -General Requirements and Minimum Standards 6. Chapter 9 Permits -Specific a. Section 4-9-070: Environmental Review Procedures 7. Chapter 11 Definitions B. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element: 2. Community Design Element: 3. Environment Element: C. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. Environmental Review Residential Single Family {RS} land use designation Natural areas; Established Residential areas; and New and Infill Development; Wetland Except when located on lands covered by water or sensitive areas, short plats are exempt from SEPA environmental review pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(6)(a). The proposed project is subject to environmental review due to a critical area on the site (within proposed Tract A) and is subject to City of Renton Environmental Review Procedures (RMC 4-9-070). 2. Compliance with ERC Conditions The City of Renton, on June 22, 2015, issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS). 3. Staff Review Comments Representatives from various city departments and the Renton School District have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of this report. 4. Comments from the Public Comments received from the public were considered during review of the proposed project. 5. Consistency with Short Plat Criteria Approval of a short plat is based upon several factors. The following short plat criteria have been established to assist decision-makers in the review of the plat: a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Designation The site is designated Residential Single Family (RS) on the Comprehensive Plan land Use Map. land designated RS is intended to be used for quality detached residential development organized into neighborhoods at urban densities. It is intended that infill development be carefully designed to enhance and improve the quality of single-family living environments. The proposal is consistent ERC and Short Plat Report -Campbell City of Renton Department of Community & E ... ..,,,omic Development CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT Report of June 22, 2015 ~-nvironmental Review Committee Report LUAlS-000239, ECF, SHPL-A Page 7 of 16 with the following Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Community Design Element policies, if all conditions of approval are met, unless noted otherwise: Policy LU-158. Net development densities should fall within a range of 4.0 to 8.0 dwelling units per net acre in Residential Single Family neighborhoods. Policy Objective Met D Not Met Policy EN-6. When development may impact wetlands, the following hierarchy should be followed in deciding the appropriate course of action: a. avoid impacts to the wetland, b. minimize impacts to the wetland, c. restore the wetland when impacted, d. recreate the wetland at a ratio which will provide for its assured viability & success, e. enhance the functional values of an existing degraded wetland. Policy Objective Met D Not Met Policy EN-7. Protect buffers along wetlands to facilitate infiltration and maintain stable water temperatures, provide for biological diversity, reduce amount and velocity of run-off, and provide for wildlife habitat. Policy Objective Met D Not Met Objective CD-A. The City's unique natural features, including land form, vegetation, lakeshore, river, creeks and streams, and wetlands should be protected and enhanced as opportunities arise. Policy Objective Met D Not Met Objective CD-C. Promote reinvestment in and upgrade of existing residential neighborhoods through redevelopment of small, underutilized parcels with infill development, modification and alteration of older housing stock, and improvements to streets and sidewalks to increase property values. Policy Objective Met D Not Met Policy CD-12. Sidewalks or walking paths should be provided along streets in established neighborhoods, where sidewalks have not been previously constructed. Sidewalk width should be ample to safely and comfortably accommodate pedestrian traffic and, where practical, match existing sidewalks. Policy Objective Met D Not Met Policy CD-14. Infill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be encouraged in order to add variety, update housing stock, and increase vitality of neighborhoods. Policy Objective Met D Not Met Policy CD-15. Infill development should be reflective of the existing character of established neighborhoods even when designed using different architectural styles, and/or responding to more urban setbacks, height or lot requirements. Infill development should draw on elements of existing development such as placement of structures, vegetation, and location of entries and walkways, to reflect the site planning and scale of existing areas. Policy Objective Met D Not Met b} Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation The subject site is designated Residential-8 (R-8) Dwelling Units Per Net Acre (du/ac) on the City of Renton Zoning Map. RMC 4-2-llOA provides development standards for development within the ERC and Short Plot Report -Campbell City of Renton Department of Community & ..... ..,nomic Development CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT Report of June 22, 2015 tnvironmental Review Committee Report LUA15-000239, ECF, SHPL-A Page 8 of 16 R-8 zoning classification. The proposal is consistent with the following development standards if all conditions of approval are complied with: Density: The allowed density range in the R-8 zone is a maximum of 8.0 dwelling units per net acre. There is also a minimum density of 4 dwelling units per net acre. After subtracting 2,830 square feet for proposed right-of-way dedications, 1,807 square feet for private access easements, and 57,434 square feet for critical areas, the net square footage of the site is 21,357 square feet (0.49 net acres). The 2-lot proposal would arrive at a net density of 4.08 dwelling units per net acre (2 lots/ 0.49 acres= 4.08 du/ac), which falls within the permitted density range for the R-8 zone. Additionally, due to the environmental constraints of the property the minimum density requirements of the code can be waived (RMC 4-2-110D.1.b.). Lot Dimensions: The minimum lot size permitted in the interim R-8 zoning designation is 7,000 square feet. A minimum lot width of 60 feet is required for interior lots and 70 feet for corner lots. Lot depth is required to be a minimum of 90 feet (Exhibit 2). As demonstrated in the table be/aw, all lats meet the requirements far minimum lat size, depth, and width far the R-8 zone: Proposed Lots Lot Size Lot Depth Lot Width 7,000 SF minimum 90 feet minimum 60 feet required (70 feet earner lats} 13,445 GSF 90 feet 71.12 feet Lot 1 (7,318 NSF*) Lot2 7,912 SF 100.37 feet 91.13 feet All Lots (Average) 8,948 SF 95.19 feet 81.13 feet Tract A-Critical Areas 57,434 SF N/A N/A Tract B -Joint Use 1,807 SF N/A N/A Driveway *Because the panhandle portion of the northwest corner of lot 1 has a width of less than 80% of the minimum lot width of 50', it was subtracted from the gross lot area and noted as "net" orea. Setbacks: The minimum front yard and rear yard setbacks in the interim R-8 zone are 25 feet front yard; 25 feet side yard along a street (including access easements); 7 .5 feet side yards (combined 15 feet with not less than 5 feet on either side per Cl-64); and 25 feet rear yard. The proposed lots are oriented so that the front yards of each lot would face north towards NE 9th Street and the rear yards would be located along the south portion of the lots. The proposed lots appear to contain adequate area to provide all the required setback areas. Compliance with building setback requirements would be reviewed at the time of building permit review. Building Standards: The R-8 zone permits one dwelling with one accessory dwelling unit per lot. Accessory structures are permitted at a maximum number of two per lot with a maximum size of 720 square feet each, or a maximum of one per lot with a maximum of 1,000 square feet. Accessory structures are permitted only when associated with a primary structure located on the same parcel of land. The property is currently vacant of any structures. Height: The maximum building height in the R-8 zone is 30 feet. Detached accessory structures must remain below a height of 15 feet and one story. Building height is based on the measurement of the vertical distance from the grade plane to the average height of the roof surface. The grade plane is the average of existing ground level adjoining the building at exterior walls. Where the finished ground level slopes away from the exterior walls, the reference plane shall be established by the lowest points within the area between the building and the lot line, or where the lot line is more than 6 feet from the building, between the building and a point 6 feet from the building. One dwelling unit, of typical two-story, wood-frame construction, per lot is planned. Building elevations, ERC and Short Plat Report -Campbell City of Renton Department of Community & E..,.,nomic Development CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT Report of June 22, 2015 environmental Review Committee Report LUA15-000239, £CF, SHPL-A Page 9 of 16 which would be used to determine building height, have not been submitted. The building standards for the proposed lots would be reviewed and verified at the time of building permit review. Building Coverage: The maximum building coverage in the R-8 zone is 40 percent. Compliance with building coverage requirements would be reviewed at the time of building permit review. Impervious Coverage: The maximum allowed impervious surface area in the R-8 zone is fifty-five percent (55%). The maximum building coverage is limited to 40% per lot, and the maximum impervious surface is 55% (Ordinance No. 5724 and Cl-64). Compliance with impervious lot coverage requirements would be reviewed at the time of building permit review. Parking: Off-street parking for two (2) vehicles per residential unit is required. Sufficient area exists, on each lot, to accommodate off-street parking for a minimum of two vehicles. c) Community Assets Site Landscaping: Landscaping is required for all subdivisions, including short plats. A detailed landscape plan must be approved prior to issuance of street or utility construction permits. Ten feet (10') of on-site landscaping is required along all public street frontages, with the exception of areas for required walkways and driveways per RMC 4-4-070. Such landscaping shall include a mixture of trees, shrubs, and ground cover as approved by the Department of Community and Economic Development. Where there is insufficient right-of-way space or no public frontage, street trees are required in the front yard. Minimum planting strip widths between the curb and sidewalk are established according to the street development standards of RMC 4-6-060. Street trees and, at a minimum, ground cover are to be located in this area when present. The City's landscaping regulations require the installation of landscaping within the public right-of- way and the landscaping proposed must either consist of drought resistant vegetation or shall be irrigated appropriately. The applicant has submitted a conceptual landscape plan including the following landscaping within the 8-foot planter strip: 4 Persian Parrotia; 15 boxleaf hebe, 15 evergreen huckleberry, 10 English lavender; and 45 kinnickinnick (Exhibit 7). The submitted landscaping plan identifies that all trees, shrubs and other plants will be maintained by the developer by watering, pruning, cultivating and weeding until final acceptance by the future owner but in no case less than 90 days after substantial completion of the project. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to revise the Landscape Plan to show a minimum of 10 feet of on-site landscaping along the street frontage of Lot 1. Additionally, where there is insufficient right-of-way space or no public frontage, two street trees are required in the front yard. Therefore, a minimum of two (2) trees are to be located in the front yard of proposed Lot 2 prior to construction permit approval. Tree Retention: Existing trees shall be retained where feasible. RMC 4-4-130 requires 30 percent of trees to be retained. If the required number of trees cannot be retained, they must be replaced according to RMC 4-4-130H. The applicant provided a Tree Retention Plan (Exhibit 6) and a Tree Retention Worksheet. The applicant is proposing to retain all trees within critical areas and buffers of Tract A and nine (9) trees throughout the rest of the site (7-Douglas fir trees outside the wetland buffer and 2 Madrone trees and 1 Douglas fir tree within the south portion of Lot 2). The trees proposed to be retained range between 8 and 24 inches in caliper. According to the Arborist Report, there are a total of 135 significant trees with a diameter at breast height (DBH) of 6" or greater within the parcel boundaries (Exhibit 8). Red Alder represents the majority or roughly 60%, followed by wild Cherry, Cottonwood, Douglas fir, Hazelnut, Pacific willow, and a row of Bamboo. The identified trees range in diameter from 6" to 60"DBH. There are a total of 38 (of the possible 135) trees that exist outside the wetland, wetland buffers or the proposed private access tract. As previously mentioned, the applicant is required to retain 30 percent of the trees located on-site that are not located within critical areas, proposed rights-of-way, and access easements. Therefore, the applicant would be required to retain at least 11 trees in order to meet the 30% tree retention £RC and Short Plat Report-Campbell City of Renton Department of Community & ..... ..,nomic Development CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT Report of June 22, 2015 L..nvironmental Review Committee Report LUA15-000239, ECF, SHPL-A Page 10 of 16 requirement. The applicant has proposed to retain 11 of the significant trees throughout the site, thereby complying with Tree Retention requirements of the code (Exhibit 6). The proposed tree retention plan preserves and enhances the City's physical and aesthetic character by minimizing indiscriminate removal of the vegetation on-site. The provided Tree Protection Plan would be consistent with the specific tree protection measures required by Renton Municipal Code for retained trees and seek to retain 11 trees, which meets the minimum tree retention requirement. Critical Areas: The site contains a critical area throughout the central and southwestern portion of the property. The applicant submitted a Wetland Reconnaissance prepared by AOA, LLC (dated January 29, 2015; Exhibit 9), which addresses the site's critical area. The on-site wetland is a classified as a Category II under RMC 4-3-0SO(M), and receives a standard buffer of 50 feet. The applicant is proposing to designate all the wetland and associated buffer as a designated Native Growth Protection Area (NGPA) Tract. The vegetation within the wetland includes black cottonwood, Oregon ash and red Alder trees. The predominate shrub species within the wetland is hard hack spirea, which allows the wetland to serve somewhat as a filter and allow sediment in the water to settle. The 2008 AlderNW's Wetland Evaluation Report delineated the limits of the wetland and indicated the effectiveness of the wetland buffers and how they have been affected by the existing residential development activity immediately adjacent to the subject property (Exhibits 9 & 12). For example, the southern limits of the wetland generally follow the southern property line due to the development of the athletic field. Hydrologically, the wetland is supported by surface runoff and near surface seepage from the adjacent side slopes, along with some discharge from the stormwater pond to the west. No buffer mitigation or enhancement plan is proposed as part of the development. The Critical Areas Tract is proposed to be a 57,434-square-foot wetland tract. In order for the Category II wetland and its proposed buffer to remain protected, staff recommends, as a condition of approval, that the applicant place Tract A in a Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE), which shall be noted on the face of the plat. Staff recommends as a condition of approval that a Homeowners' Association (HOA) or similar entity be established for the development, to ensure that responsibility is taken for maintenance of common improvements and tracts within the short plat. Finally, adequate provisions are being made for drainage and utility connections. Each owner of Lots shall have a fractional interest in the Critical Areas Tract A in order to protect the site in perpetuity. Staff is recommending, as a condition of approval, that the applicant install a wood, split-rail fence with wetland signage along the edge of Tract A. The split-rail fence shall be constructed prior to recording of the short plat. Staff also recommends a condition of approval requiring the HOA or similar entity ensure maintenance of the split-rail fence. d} Compliance with Subdivision Regulations Streets: No new public streets would be created as part of the proposed short plat. There is currently a partially paved and improved public right-of-way along the frontage of NE 9th Street. The existing right-of-way width in NE 9th Street is 30 feet and has been identified as a residential access street. The required frontage improvements along NE 9th Street include 16 feet of pavement, a 0.5-foot-wide curb, an 8-foot-wide landscaped planter, and a 5-foot-wide sidewalk. The applicant has proposed to dedicate 2,830 square feet to for right-of-way improvements on NE 9th Street. The proposed short plat is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system. However, it is not anticipated that the proposed project would significantly or adversely impact the City of Renton's street system subject to the payment of code-required impact fees and the construction of code-required frontage improvements (Exhibit 15). In order to mitigate ERC and Short Plot Report-Campbell City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT Report of June 22, 2015 Environmental Review Committee Report LUA15-000239, ECF, SHPL-A Page 11 of 16 transportation impacts, payment of transportation impact fees is applicable on all new single-family homes. The current transportation impact fee rate is $2,214.44 per new lot. The transportation impact fee that is current at the time of building permit will be levied. Payment of the transportation impact fee is due at the time of issuance of the single-family building permits. The applicant is proposing a 20-foot-wide joint use driveway, Tract B, along the first 90 feet of the east property line to serve the short plat's internal site access needs. The shared driveway is proposed to connect with the existing public street (NE 9th St). Access to each lot shall be served from the proposed shared driveway; a note to this effect shall be placed on the face of the short plat. The minimum requirements identified in RMC 4-6-060J Shared Driveway Standards including but not limited to maintenance covenants and access easements (including a City of Renton Public Utility easement) shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the recording of the short plat. No additional curb cuts from the short plat to the public street will be allowed as part of the platting process. Upon the approval of the Renton Fire Department, the width of the shared driveway tract and paved surface may be reduced from twenty feet (20') to a minimum of sixteen feet (16'). All new driveway approaches for single-family lots are required to maintain a five-foot (5') separation from the adjoining property line (RMC 4-8-0601.2.b). One reason for this is so the apron of the driveway approach doesn't extend onto the right-of-way of the neighboring lot. Staff is recommending that the applicant provide a shared driveway approach to Tract B that is no closer than five feet (5') to the east property line in order to retain enough room for the driveway approach apron, road maintenance, a privacy fence, and onsite landscape screening. The additional area on the east side of the shared driveway, between the east property line and the edge of the pavement, should not impact the 2-lot short plats ability to maintain compliance with Renton Municipal Code. The maximum width of any single loaded garage driveway shall not exceed nine feet (9'), and the maximum width of any double-loaded garage driveway shall not exceed sixteen feet (16'). There is an existing luminaire pole located at corner of Anacortes Ave NE and NE 9th St. Staff is recommending, as a condition of short plat approval, that the existing luminaire pole be located within the proposed 8-foot-wide planter strip at corner of Anacortes Ave NE and NE 9th St. Blocks: No blocks are being created as part of this short plat. Lots: The proposed two (2) lots would meet the principles of acceptability for a short plat as stated in RMC 4-7-0706. Each lot would be a legal building site compliant with shape, orientation, and arrangement of the subdivision regulations and the development standards of the R-8 zone. All lots are located outside the SO-foot wetland buffer and the design allows for tree preservation, and public to private shared driveway access. All lots meet the requirements for minimum lot size, depth, and width as demonstrated above in the lot dimension table on page 8 of this report. All proposed lots appear to have sufficient building area for the development of detached single-family residences, provided the applicant complies with the conditions of approval. Access to a public road would be created to each legal building lot. No direct driveway access from any lot to NE 9th St will be allowed. In addition to the proposed two new lots, the small subdivision would create a new shared driveway tract (Tract B) and one new wetland tract (Tract A). e} Compliance with Residential Design Standards RMC 4-2-llSE Residential Design and Open Space Standards provides residential and open space standards for development within the R-8 zoning classification. Residential Design and Open Space Standards (RMC 4-2-115) are applicable in the R-8 zoning classification. The Standards implement policies established in the Land Use and Community Design Elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Compliance with Site Design Standards for lot configuration, garages, open space, primary entry, fa~ade modulation, windows and doors, scale, bulk, and character, roofs, eaves, architectural detailing, and materials and color would be demonstrated prior to issuance of building permits. ERC and Short Plat Report -Campbell City of Renton Department of Community & Ewnomic Development CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT Report of June 22, 2015 environmental Review Committee Report LUA15-000239, ECF, SHPL-A Page 12 of 16 Building designs, which would be used to evaluate residential design standards, have not been submitted for the undeveloped lots yet. They would be submitted for building permit review. f) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries Access: Each lot must have access to a public street or road. There will be a 20-foot-wide shared driveway along the east property line, designed as Tract B, which will be constructed to serve the proposed two (2) lots from NE 9th St. Topography: The site slopes down from an elevation of about 416 feet along the east property line to an elevation of about 406 feet. The southwest corner of the property is generally flat at about an elevation of 404 to 406 feet. Due to the potential for erosion that could occur during construction activities, staff recommended a condition of approval, that Temporary Erosion Control Plan be installed and maintained in accordance with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Standards and subject to the approval of the Department of Community & Economic Development Plan Review project manager. Relationship to Existing Uses: All properties surrounding the subject site are designated R-8 on the City's zoning map. To the north and east of the site, there are existing single-family residences. To the south of the site are the Honey Dew athletic fields and to the west, beyond the wetlands on the subject site, is a church. The proposal is similar to existing development patterns in the area and is compatible with the athletic fields and the church property. In addition, the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code, which encourages residential infill development. g) Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness} Police and Fire: Police service would be provided by the Renton Police Department. The Renton Police Department has commented that the proposed project would have minimal impact on police services. Sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development, subject to the condition that the applicant provides Code-required improvements and fees. Fire Department apparatus access roadways are required to be a minimum of 20 feet wide fully paved. The fire flow requirement for a single-family residence is a minimum 1,000 gallons per minute (gpm) for structures up to 3,600 sf (including any attached garage and basement). If dwelling(s) exceed 3,600 sf, a minimum of 1,500 gpm would be required. A minimum one fire hydrant is required within 300 feet of the proposed buildings and two hydrants if the fire flow requirement goes up to 1,500 gpm. Any existing hydrants can be counted toward the requirements as long as they meet current code including 5 inch storz fittings. A minimum of one new hydrant shall be required as there are no hydrants within 300 feet of Lot 2. The fire impact fees are currently applicable at the rate of $495.10 per single-family unit. The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code prior to building permit issuance. Furthermore, buildings shall have approved address numbers placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from NE 9th Street. Schools: The Renton School District has indicated that they have capacity to accommodate students anticipated from this development. Students would attend Honey Dew Elementary School, McKnight Middle School, and Hazen High School. The Middle School is the only school that would be located far enough away for the school district to provide bus transportation. The other two schools are within walking distance and no school bus would be provided. There is an identified safe walking route to the elementary school (Exhibit 14). The safe walking route to the high school includes walking north on Anacortes Ave NE, east on NE 10'" St and north along Hoquiam Ave NE. A School Impact Fee would be collected on behalf of the Renton School District for each new residence at the time of building permit issuance. The current Renton School District fee for each new single-family dwelling is $5,541.00 per unit. £RC and Short Plat Report-Campbell City of Renton Department of Community & E~~ .. omic Development CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT Report of June 22, 2015 L..nvironmental Review Committee Report LUAlS-000239, ECF, SHPL-A Page 13 of 16 Parks: Although there would be no significant impacts to the City of Renton Park System anticipated from the proposed project, a Park Impact Fee is required of all new residential development. The current Park Impact Fee is $1,441.29 per new residence and is paid at the time of building permit issuance. Storm Water: A drainage plan and drainage report was submitted by Encompass Engineering & Surveying (dated April 7, 2015; Exhibit 11). Pursuant to this report the subject site is underlain with Alderwood, gravelly sandy loam (Ag(). The proposed 2-lot subdivision is subject to Full Drainage review in accordance with the City of Renton Amendments to the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual. Based on the City's flow control map, this site falls within the Flow Control Duration Standard, Forested Condition. The project is subject to flow control BMPs per City of Renton Amendments to King County Storm Water Design Manual section 1.2.3.3. Full dispersion is proposed in the plans for lot 1 and tract A and basic dispersion/limited infiltration is proposed for lot 2. Full dispersion, basic dispersion and limited infiltration must be designed and located per City of Renton Amendments to King County Storm Water Design Manual sections C.2.1 and C.2.4 and 5.4. Because the development of this project will result in less than 0.1 CFS increase of the 100-year runoff, detention is not required for this project per King County Storm Water Design Manual Amended by City of Renton. Final plans and a drainage report based on the City of Renton Amendments to the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual are required to be submitted with the utility construction permit. The current surface water system development charge (SDC) fee is $1,350.00 per new lot. Fees are payable prior to issuance of the construction permit, and the fee rate that is current at the time of issuance of the utility construction permit will be applicable. Water: The proposed development is within the City's water service area and in the Highlands 565 hydraulic zone. The development is outside of the City's aquifer protection areas. In NE 9th St there is an existing 8-inch water main (see City water project plan no. W 2107), which can deliver 2,000 gallons per minute (gpm). Located at the southwest corner of NE 9th St and Bremerton Ave NE is a fire hydrant that can deliver 1,000 gallons per minute. However, the hydrant is more than 300 feet away from the new southerly lot. The development would be subject to the following: 1) applicable water improvements, including installation of 1-inch minimum domestic water service line and meter to each lot prior to recording of the plat and submittal of civil plans for the water main extension; 2) water system development charges and water meter installations fee (based on the size of the meters) in order to provide water service for domestic use and fire protection to the subject development; 3) installation of an additional fire hydrant within 300 feet of each lot in order to provide the required coverage. Sanitary Sewer: Sewer service is provided by the City of Renton. In NE 9th St there is an existing 8- inch sewer main that the applicant would be allowed to directly connect to. The development is subject to a wastewater system development charge (SDC) fee that is based on the size of the new domestic water to serve the new home on each lot. The sewer fee for a% inch or 1 inch meter install is $2,135.00. This parcel is also subject to a Special Assessment District. The East Renton Interceptor fee is $316.80 per lot. Payment of these fees will be required prior to issuance of the utility construction permit. All plats shall provide separate side sewer stubs to each building lot prior to recording of the short plat. D. FINDINGS OF FACT: Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1. Request: The project proponent has requested approval of a short plat of 83,428 square feet {l.92 acres), located in the Highlands District, into two (2) lots, suitable for development with single-family ERC and Short Plat Report -Campbell City of Renton Department of Community & ,_i..vnomic Development CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT Report of June 22, 2015 Environmental Review Committee Report LUAlS-000239, ECF, SHPL·A Page 14 of 16 residential structures, one critical areas tract, and one shared driveway tract. The project would have a density of 4.08 dwelling units per net acre. 2. Application: The property, located at SW Corner of the interseciton of NE 9th St and Anacortes Ave NE (APN 1023059095), is owned by Renton Church of the Nazarene. 3. Comprehensive Plan: The property has a Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Residential Single Family (RS). The proposed project furthers the objectives and policies of the RS section of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Zoning: Objectives and policies of the RS designation are implemented by standards and regulations of the Residential 8 zone. The project, as proposed, meets or exceeds the R-8 standards and regulations if all conditions are met. S. Subdivision Regulations: The short plat, as proposed, would meet the requirements of Chapter 4-7 RMC, Subdivision Regulations if all conditions of short plat approval set forth below are met. 6. Existing Land Uses: Vacant. 7. Setbacks: Minimum building setback requirements would be met. 8. System Development Charges: The current surface water system development charge (SDC) fee is $1,350.00 per new lot. Fees are payable prior to issuance of the construction permit, and the fee rate that is current at the time of issuance of the utility construction permit will be applicable. 9. Public Utilities: Impacts to public services are assessed on a single-family dwelling unit basis; it is not anticipated the project would result in impacts to utilities if all the conditions of approval are met and the fees are paid. The current fee for transportation impacts is $2,214.44 per single-family dwelling; the current fee for parks is $1,441.29 per single-family dwelling; the current fee for schools is $5,541.00 per single-family dwelling; and the current fee for fire is $495.10 per single-family dwelling. The identified 2015 fee rates are effective from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015. City of Renton 2016 development fees become effective January 1, 2016. 10. Schools: The project site is located within the Renton School District (RSD), which encompasses approximately 35 square miles. Students would attend Honey Dew Elementary School, McKnight Middle School, and Hazen High School. RSD has indicated it would be able to handle the impact of the additional students estimated to come from the proposed development. 11. Safe Routes to Schools: The Renton School District will bus all students to and from the middle school. The elementary school and the high school have been identified as being within walking distance. There is an identified safe walking route to the elementary school and the high school. E. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The subject site is designated Residential Single Family (RS) in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and complies with the goals, objectives, and policies established with this designation. 2. The subject site is zoned Residential 8 (R-8) and complies with the zoning and development standards established with this designation, provided the applicant complies with the Renton Municipal Code, advisory notes and conditions of approval contained herein. 3. The proposed 8-lot short plat complies with the subdivision regulations as established by Renton Municipal Code and state law, provided the project complies with advisory notes and conditions of approval contained herein. 4. The proposed short plat complies with the street standards as established by Renton Municipal Code, provided the project complies with advisory notes and conditions of approval contained herein. ERC and Short Plat Report -Campbell City of Renton Deportment of Community & Ecu,,omic Development CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT Report of June 22, 2015 F. DECISION: environmental Review Committee Report WAlS-000139, ECF, SHPL-A Page 15 of 16 The Campbell Short Plat, File No. LUAlS-000239, ECF, SHPL-A is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall create and record a Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) for the area contained within the wetland and associated buffers over Critical Area Tract A prior to or concurrent with short plat recording. Each owner of lots 1 and 2 shall have a fractional interest in the Critical Areas Tract in order to protect the Tract in perpetuity. 2. The applicant shall be required to revise and resubmit the Landscape Plan to show a minimum of 10 feet of on-site landscaping on Lot 1 along the public street frontage and two trees in the front yard of lot 2. The plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to the issuance of the construction permit for on-site utilities. 3. The applicant shall provide a shared driveway approach to Tract B that shall be no closer than five feet (5') to the east property line in order to retain enough room for the driveway approach apron, road maintenance, a privacy fence, and onsite landscape screening. The additional area on the east side of the shared driveway, between the east property line and the edge of the pavement, should not impact the 2-lot short plats ability to maintain compliance with Renton Municipal Code. 4. The applicant shall install a wood split-rail fence with wetland signage along the edge of Tract A. The wood split-rail fence shall include the proposed group of trees to be retained at the northwest corner of the property. Such a split-rail fence shall be constructed prior to the recording of the short plat. A requirement to maintain the fence by a Homeowners' Association or similar entity shall be placed on the face of the short plat. 5. The applicant shall provide access to each lot from the proposed shared driveway (Tract B). A note to this effect shall be placed on the face of the short plat prior to recording. 6. The applicant shall locate the existing luminaire pole at corner of Anacortes Ave NE and NE 9th St to be within the proposed 8-foot-wide planter strip at corner of Anacortes Ave NE and NE 9th St. 7. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Evaluation prepared by Geospectrum Consultants, Inc. dated March 11, 2015 (or an updated report submitted at a later date) during site and building construction. 8. The applicant shall be required to submit, to the Plan Reviewer for review and approval, a revised final drainage report and associated plans, based on the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (as amended by the City of Renton) prior to construction permit approval. DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURE: Jennifer Henning, Planning Director Date Department af Community & Economic Development TRANSMITTED this 22"d doy of June 2015 to the Contoct/Applicont/Owner(s): Owner(s): Applicant: Contact: Renton Church of the Nazarene PO Box 2640 Renton WA 98056 ERC and Short Plat Report -Campbell Peter St. Pierre Forest Contracting LLC 27018 233rd Pl SE Maple Valley, WA 98038 Tom Redding Encompass Engineering & Surveying 165 NE Juniper St., Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 City of Renton Department of Community & i;;;l,onomic Development CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT Report of June 22, 2015 TRANSMITTED this 22nd day af June 2015 ta the Parties of Record: Peter St Pierre Stephen Chow Pacific Peak Construction Services Inc. 4004 NE 19th St Renton, WA 98056 losif Mishkov 2471 S 224th St Des Moines, WA 98198 862 Bremerton Ave NE Renton, WA 98059 Renton Church of Nazarene 850 Union Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 TRANSMITTED this 22nd day of June 2015 to the following: Jan Conklin, Development Services CE. "Chip" Vincent, CED Administrator Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager Steve lee, Development Engineering Manager Plan Review Fire Marshal Environmental Review Committee Report LUA15-000239, ECF, SHPL-A Page 16 of 16 Chad Allen Encompass Engineering & Surveying 165 NE Juniper St., Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 G. LAND USE ACTION APPEALS, REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION, & EXPIRATION The Environmental Determination and the Administrative Short Plat Review decisions will become final if the decisions are not appealed within the 14-day appeal period [RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680)]. Environmental Determination Appeal: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 p.m. July 10, 2015. Administrative Short Plat Approval Appeal: Appeals of the administrative site development plan review decision must be filed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 p.m. on July 10, 2015. APPEALS: The above land use decisions will become final if not appealed in writing together with the required fee to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. RMC 4-8- 110 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner and additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7th Floor, (425) 430-6510. RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days of the decision date, any party may request that the decision be reopened by the approval body. The approval body may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the approval body finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14-day appeal time frame. EXPIRATION: The Administrative Short Plat approval will expire two (2) years from the date of decision. A single one (1) year extension may be requested pursuant to RMC 4-7-070.M. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE: provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning the land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial decision, but to Appeals to the Hearing Examiner as well. All communications after the decision/approval date must be made in writing through the Hearing Examiner. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the appeal by the Court. ERC and Short Plat Report -Campbell • --I ' ---I --NOO"l_~.:-sw Of 8EAAING I 4-'TH !\IE N .. ~ '"li! ,"' "" i ;,: ~ .. $ ~ p ~ • !J l" a ! a " ~ !" .. " .......,------ 1 I "' 1l j ~ I " z ~ " • ' • ~ ~ ,;,. ~ m >< ::c 1-1 c:, 1-1 ~ w ' t • • .. 1 •••.• 1,.as.,i ~ ..... ,,. • ' ·~ '.i " ,a~ " ,,. \'I ;: ,. " ---. ·- , '!"",. -- ...... -;.-· ---·-··--------......... , --~ ~ lJI . 1 :..r.:sus J&b.ll Ji) ,: i't ;::., . ....... DUVALL ,.~ C '§ 1 I -. b·~,_!~-T'-~"~~"-, ------c:3---· u, ... Ii -··J·"• ~()OJ 01.1() JoOfJo.J Wl.ll ,~ '"' .. ,: -~-e "'·" " , .. "''"" ,.,. NE ll>OT_H AYII OE]-·-----·--·--·- 1$]3 I ti.ii lff.U (P.I ' ~ $oL .. -:i:eeo 1!1111111 i11:~:11: 1•1·11· ! e#OeOf:.@( IP 11'11 /, ------:r--- " I~ ' i • ! --··""" ---·'\.---'. Union Avenue Notheast ,, . ' _.,,,,;-. ... -n,,. -------+ !' I :,-- s ., . i• I _, - U I " I •; 11 11 !iii al a ~~ ~ !!11 !111 ;! ;! IHI ~~ ;a ::ii ::l~ I ) mi mi 1!11 ~ 11 :ii11111m ,,1 t'I i''' I •1111 ·11:; • ,, ,, . ,! i I ,,! ii! ! !, 1. 11,i 11-~ 1 i 1=1 . . ~ .. 1 i !i • • ., i 111 I , j j !!! i 11! ·jl !'iii' I ' ,p 1 ,1, .i !• ' "I I I, I ·, tii i::__:. ' ' ' L----------- CMPBELL SHORT PLAT BOUNO#Y/TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY -----'. m >< ::c t-1 a:, :i u, -, "' > " -, .. !2 " z .~1· ' l! j ' ,' /~, '' T ___ .......,l / / / / \ \ I ) \ \- CA~'BEL.L SHORT PlAT COHCEPJIAL DRAINAGE CONTROL, GffRAJ..fZED UTILITY, GRADING TRANSPORT A TfON PLAN I , I m >< :::c ""' CCI ""' -t 0\ 1 -9,,.,"'.;;; <S~:J l!PIIIIU ''1•'"11' t!l H -~ I , • .,,, ,'!••;• -! --- 1, -~L:> ·:\·· ~~'=' .·z ~q·. <~:::'\;> ,,/t .. !;:: ~ti ',,-_,;f_(_~i '/-·I · ; :.:.• 4- ' ,_ ' !"i 1-r, ,-·---- ' ,, ~r ;/~ I I --, r ;c:·•·=<· •',,_ ~ ./\ ~M~f'. :t-, ' E ~-1!};1· , ,:/~. ·: ifr,io ~~ ,, , ,T, ii / ~' ~ I : iJ -;' ' / ____ _ ----I I I I I 1W ;r .. ~f [jj , ?~-~ i -0"''-~--~--'1'.•~·_:: I J ,:,/ ,._ • ~'"' ,_,,,'-I : t, '}. ----·--f--~~e Ave~~ -- :~J' _.'"--r;--~-,~ _ :·~ 1 ~:r; 1 1 11 f~'-,.~.,..:~ _-,:_1 ~-:i---, -- '1'1 · r -' A X ' = ')( / -' ~ -~ 1 : ~ : , )( -l'; . C ":11J J -1 1 1 ' I :_~. J, 1-""! -~h~_-!'-: .. -;,: -_ ;~ "';_L; ~ i, ·1 ~1 i I ; . T 'i_ · ;i ::~ ,,!.:;·~ ·;i1. ; i • ·_ 1 1 l~I /._r',: 1:' . -1/ 11 ~ ---~--x, l.i ""~' . "' / 1 ,'J ~()I{ '.ii( ~ -~MI:: TRACT B ~ ~ .. '~~ (ti I'.\·:;.·;,..,• . U*E Q!UYEWA\ f ,' ,l -,- r----, ' CAPBELL SHORT PLAT ~''8 ; t: NOllTH ~ ' ' . ,., ...... , ....... ,.,._ .... ,,0.,,-...,,,,.,,~,, ...... ~,,, .... , ---, ...... , ..... c,, ..... _w,..,,,,.....,_,,.,, TREE RETENTIN/LAND CLEARING PLAN LOT 12 LOT 11 . I ' ' l '-IISSION HILLS ',OL 167. f>C. :ill-~ LOT 10 J . I_ . -~ i' _____ _:i;~ACT ' -'·, 1' \ '·,. ·,. \ '· I·, \ '·1--" ' A \/AT1VC c;;ROWTrl PROTECT16N ·, EASEMEN_T/ . . '57.4J4 ~o. n \ I-' ......... ,'-~-~ • I • ·. • \ I '·-...;, :'·--·-..._.. .. -·--:--, ·'· \ I ·:::... ._ .... ·. ' \ I -- / IC::: 'Z I !!! '« ' I "' _,: ~ ,o ' " LOT 7 ' ; ~ / :. " ! I! '-.>~ _____ _j .J--. NE: §ti;··st,·"'-·-=:1--·--< __ .... ·,:. / ' . ----. _........,,.,._. ,,,. --. --------32""':---. _.·-7·· ,'··. I ~ /·····,., .. ) ..... f •• ~~-/ ' •,., ............ -.. -, v· ··1~ ... " ~"-.... • I -· -\ .. ----,",,. \ ~ .... ________ 1 _____ 1 ~ I \ • I " I \ __,, 152~2son 1 .n I ,, -LOT LOT 1B A'...._. ' c\ I ,..-. -·""' \ ·r-: \ I.... ·j: \ \. '~---------------,-l ~ . \ . I I ... ,. ,,. r-----·. ~. \ ., \ :x I • . I WOOD'CREEK VllL 192. !PC. 86-1 \-1 I ' ~--,·-' \ \ • I . \ " 1·. .} \ . , 859'.: ' ,,: LOT 13 '· \. . ' . WE'l'LAN.D. ·, ·, _.\ .... ' _26,1_0~-~7 $Q'_ ff.., C '),. \_. • • . . // \ •,c;--\--~z---~---, :t t .. ·,_/' .. ~. ·:\; • . ..,._ \ \:·_. ,..9\2 r n. : 1 .. ~ ·>-...... \. i : • ".':,,a \ --,) : L...________ __ --,,,_ .. -1·-, [J/1 I _,I '\.. --· { ">I I~ \ ·'· I . •' '•1 ' I • / . '-. . '/ '> ' I • . "· I ' ·-•~ ' I '. / / '---------,------: LOT 12 \ / :1 / ) ,,. ~ / '· . . ' ·"'' . / , I ' • / ' . --,· lo, ;( ~ __ ,, . :...~~~-----.. \_SILTfE~.!o.------_ I / . -., """~"' .. , ----->, -= """' . UNPLATIED ....... """ :'.'9fKTIFh, ""'1' ~,... .... ....,.__-,ry,.n,P:!',l>vT& NOT?:& INl:>l!X OI' C>AAISIN.s& LU PLAN,_.....,... u.:i, OFl"ALS • -.:.O.t10t6 ~l;,_ANilNt5 PLAN PLANT SCHEC>ULE ~ ,,,,. I HM :-!, '"' ,., .., ~ ""-______ ,,,, __ ,_ ..... ,,.... 5 G== fiif'HTWJC.oy,>£ -~~ = .... ~ ,:;owrn-r,-5IZI! f':'!!':' '93:t ~-4 2"c.AL. ...... ....._._~,<UN<T04'KT @----""""""--'" 0--V~G7'/ATIH @e-----LAV-.,. Nte161?0..IA ~ CZ2::]-.-...r,,.-,r.-.n,:,,-,w........., EXHIBIT 7 ~---~ -- 5'(U,. ~ i-.. Al.I.< - -~._.. ....... __ ... __ _ :s·o.c.. e-l-._ "'--'-'......,.. 3' OL. IO ~ a.o... -·- Qlifl ;:l l el I . ' .i j ~ ! ~ l " . :f: ~ ~ I g' -I "'' ~ == -.--.--2·-~,,_v.,_1. '=.:..- I-i6 z!~ ~ l .. .Ji ~,z !z - << ~ \) .,-11-111 1 ~ 11111 i I ; ; ; 11 i ~-= &OU,~ u Pro;.e<f ----• ~ .. , • I.LL._ u "' l C>l!TAILS 4 SFl!Cll"ICATIONS CAMl"B!!l.L SHO!'lT !"LAT ~ >N, l'IASHINeTON Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC AQA arborists Real Forest Contracting (206) 255-9893 Entire Document Available Upon Request l'.0. Box 909 Mercer lslc111d, W/\ 98040 (206) 779-2579 I have personally insoected the trees located at the Campbell subdivision south of the corner of NE 9 and &Anacortes, Renton WA, King count parcel number 1023059095 as you requested. A International Soc:ety of Arboriculture level 1 limited visual method was used. The map supplied with the proposed new homes general locations was used to aid in determining any possible impact on the trees. r, count was made of the trees 6" DBH "Diameter at Breast Height" and larger in the area outside of the wetland designated piece of the parcel. The total was 135, with Red Alder representing the majority in the 60% range with wild Cherry next, Cottonwood, Douglas fir, Hazelnut, Pacific wiilow and a row of Bamboo (this species growing on the North side ot the parcel having grown from under the neighboring property), Black berr, vines dominate the understory to a depth of 30' along the street frontage into the parcel. Sevcrril of the trt:es nre stump sprouted from some earlier cutting borde,ring th-e neighboring property on that north side. Of the species on site 311 but the Douglas fir could be termed young trees with the firs being in the 30-40 year old range the remainder in the 10-15 year old range. Overcrowding would be my opinion on tlie whole site with again the Dou3las tir being above the competition tor light. The overcrowding aside the trees on site appear to be in good health. The largest stand of Douglas fir is in the far south east corner of the parcel. To address any possible conflict between the trees and the proposed homes there are Douglas firs that look to need their root systems protected. If I have the iocation of the homes cotrect 2 Dcuglas firs north of the building site closest to the street and one larger fir along the fence line east of the second home, the back building site will be affected. it is this second fir that appears to be the dosest to the new home. There are smaller trees also to be affected but as they are the Red Alder and they so numerous I have not addressed them here. Neal Baker ArboristsNW.corn !SA Cert PN1075A !SA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified PNW ISA CTRA #867 Member AREA & SOCA EXHIBIT 8 Entire Document Available Upon Request r\ltn1anr1 Oliver i\ssc)ciates, LL(: 1 AOA January 29, 2015 Peter St. Pierre Pacific Peak Construction Services peter@pacificpeakcs.com ',.;,"'1 l0 ,l\\[('11l'llllL'l)i.d " PLn1nin:..; l'\: I c1ndsc1pc \1 (.·hlkc!un: AOA-3860 SUBJECT: Wetland Reconnaissance for Mackenzie Lane Short Plat; Renton, WA (Parcel 102305-9095) Dear Peter: On January 28, 2015 I conducted a wetland reconnaissance throughout the eastern portion of the subject property utilizing the methodology outlined in the May 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0). The primary purpose of the reconnaissance was to confirm that the wetland boundary and classification as delineated by AlderNW in 2008 remained valid. AlderNW delineated one Category 2 wetland (Wetland A) throughout the central and southwestern portion of the site. The wetland boundaries were subsequently surveyed (see survey drawing) and the delineation was documented in an August 26, 2008 report (Attachment A). Based on the recent site review, the surveyed wetland boundary appears to remain accurate and a re-delineation does not appear warranted. In addition, the classification of the wetland as a Category 2 wetland has also not changed. Category 2 wetlands in the City of Renton currently require a standard 50-foot buffer. Proposed Project It is my understanding that the proposed project has been reduced from a 4-lot short plat to a 2-lot short plat and that previously proposed buffer averaging is no longer a component of the project. The 50-foot buffer in the eastern portion of the site adjacent the proposed development currently consists of a native mixed forest and no planting is required. EXHIBIT 9 March 11, 2015 Mr. Peter St. Pierre Forest Contracting 27018 233rd Place SE Renton, WA 98038 Entire Document Available Upon Request SUBJECT: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Proposed Campbell Short Plat Dear Peter, KCPN 1023059095, 4400 Block NE gth Street Renton, Washington Project No. 15-107-01 This report presents the results of our geotechnical evaluation for the site of your proposed new residential development on the subject property. The purpose of our work was to provide geotechnical engineering evaluations of the site including storm water infiltration feasibility and geotechnical recommendations for the residential development including design of foundations, site grading, site drainage and erosion control. Our work was performed in accordance with the scope and conditions of our proposal dated March 2, 2015. A site topographic map and short plat plan (see Figure 2) was provided to us and was used as a reference for our evaluations. Based on our review of the plan provided and discussions with you, we understand that the property will be divided into 2 lots plus Tract A (wetlands) and Tract B (storm water/utilities). We assume that the residential development will include a new 2-to 3-story wood-frame residence on each of the new lots. The structures are expected to include ground level garages which will have slab- on-grade floors and the remainder of structures may have raised floors with crawl space or slab-on-grade. We assume that bearing wall loads will be in the range of about 2 to 3 kif and maximum column loads to be in the range of about 10 to 20 kips. If actual structural loads exceed the above values by more than 25%, this office should be notified. Review of the Renton online Sensitive Areas Maps indicates that the property is not indicated to be within a Steep Slope Hazard, Landslide Hazard, Erosion Hazard, Seismic Hazard or Coal Mine Hazard area. EXHIBIT 10 '; • r1corr1pa \f"NGINEERING & SlJRV!:::.YING • Entire Document Available Upon Request PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT for Campbell Short Plat April 7, 2015 Encompass Engineering Job No. 15517 Western w~shington Division Prepared For Pacific Peak Construction 4004 NE 19 1h Street Renton, WA 98056 EXHIBIT 11 165 NE Juniper St., Ste 201, Issaquah, WA 98027 Phone: (425) 392-0250 Fax: (425) 391-3055 Eastern Washington Division 407 Swiftwater Blvd, Cle Elum, WA 98922 Phone: (509) 674-7433 Fax: (509) 674-7419 www.EncompassES.net t K ~ 40 I w !Jf " .. ow ni.~r i·. ""' i. 1I ' g; d 'ii "" 11 l\'-< .. , <t("~ ... ..... jlt< !, , . ' / , /; _if' 'f \ ~---26' ·\ 1ri1 -~~ \ I \ ,, 1. ' i "J •\ ' ~ \ . ~ ~c -" I , -_ h •,· I I,: I ' h 1& ' t;\I ?u .,..,_o ''L~,-, ·---- h r ,o·r. 8 ,,. ,{~~"~ ·r~ ,.,- :r,,,icii."" (:.:, I ,r '"~' """' ' r ,.. ! 3· ,, ;::;._~· ~"' -. ,., " .... , '.'i.i·" lti.-:(~.,.s •• , •";',_,'!" ,· i· .. ,,: WF-! ,.,. ,,-r, r •• ' ,. " ~~ ,, . .,, ~--' -;,-r, r ' \ -2 'M'-1S ~ Y',; ,«·· ,,. ,, ,,; ",, '' """ ~-21 h ,;·,,,,,-· ~~-l'E-11 ' -..., ,; Vi'•••-C ~ W'-12 ll'f"-:Z ,h n 1."'-~0, ··-.,. 'J>, \ \ ~ i,11· '"'e· \ 'v,-111 (l l t~'"'"""' ,·c :f" '.~d.;•"'' .-... : h.,,, ,0·1, h ,· h ill h ;;- WETLAND \ f.i37~ 1 9· r- ,;,~'... \_ ;~· ~-':1 h 1~1 .. .;, l~'' ,, I) M"P~ r / r, +. '-~ ;.c· :, .... t-1 °'\ -;. '\,' ·,)]\. .,_ ,,._ ti if; ' "l ~ ! .. I ~ \" \ I~ ~"~-""' j j ~ \' '. _ rc~r.r , .. . ~ '·"· f ,, , • / .•. ct,' .,;,-~.\/:·.ft:: ""' ,_ ... ,-~-~··'""1 ;~ ~ .... -r· .... • II;,, r,f ' ... ~- ! ' \, .. . WF-*; o· 1., ' ' ~-,. ~-.... ii r'\ '. ,. ·"~··,, i .. •'""\ ' ,h. \ -~~ ~ :'Q·,r, __...Jlljr,r-4 --I ..,., i• \ •··I "" "i'· (, 111,,i , ,1· ..... ( k ' \ \ I t \ lit·;, e ),·.:i.,,. I rr \ ' ' .. >·" / ;;1J r, \!,f I v·,., r \• ••. ;Y,;l) 1(:~d ~ ·., >· ,w" ! '" 11 , ...,. m~· "' : '"""'' "I / i.· -'1 ,L~ ''. . / -n r,ij I J If /•<• " ~~ ~ r6' U,></'r. 1& lw.-. 1·, h ,•· 1 ... rJ. :~. ,. f' 61• "j ~:."')-' ---"J~'°"c ~ ,;. ~-,:,.. 1 ,..,v' ~~~ 0 ~ \ ' ~ . ' \,u· r,, '.f / ~~b ~· t .. ,.··. '1 '''''' ···r,, \ --,,,a;,,:--r,I .. "·1. hn," '"' / , t )"'' "'"'t' · ·,, r 1 '" 1 "-... , ~~;u)>,[ N>llt,.)H .,-r ·1 , . .-' I ... ~ '\ • / ... rtWCf . .. ,.t· '" APPROXIMATE SCALE 0 40 .,, !II." .. (>1','U.vl;S', - 80 feet - «JO !l 1l g n,~ § ,,.!,,. ,.._ ·J), ',.' ,,.". l /•" Wf-1 / i,• ~ ... ..., b -'\. \ ! • -~.,. -\, ''--'\ \ \ , .. \l,...---,. C'lttO•t l 'ft<[ -. ')E\(ELOPM£NT l'LANMN(.- CIT'V Qf° ~~F"-IT'<N SEf , ,, 2::, RECEIVED srrE MAP Renton, Washington AlderNW Proj. No.20108 I Date Aug., 20081 Figure 2 EXHIBIT 12 CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION Proposed construction start date will be approximately in Summer/Fall 2015 and completion will be in approximately two months. Hours of operation will be within the permitted time of 7:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. Monday through Friday. Proposed hauling/transportation route will be north on Anacortes Ave NE, west on NE 10th St. to Union Ave NE. Hauling will be within the restricted hours of 8:30 A.M. and 3:30 P.M Monday through Friday. Water trucks, street sweepers and any other requirements deemed necessary would be implemented for any impacts that may occur. There will be no anticipated weekend, late night or any other specialty hours proposed for construction or hauling at this time. Flag persons will be employed and signs will be installed for traffic control when necessary. EXHIBIT 13 Honeydew Elementary-Walk to School Route Options APPROVED BY RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT PIIMWClid bf Feel FIIII far th 1llfltDa 5cbNt Dlltrfl:l --1/f'O'''first ;;..,;.,,,..-,,,.,;..;..., t I:: 1 NE llt. l!i,Ellt SI • 1'¥1, 10! • I • J,:) NE I St ~:C: Nt 9th St m o•------o1 ~"' ,f 8th St • t.::i~ l ·.l • ... I.._._ i ;'ffl· __ ......... _.._,11; . ' 1-' 0 1/8 RECOMMENDED ROUTES AR£ MARKED WITH ARROWS: NE ;l!h Or NE 12th St • '" 12th t T' i ~ i ii: • I • I • I • I • I • 1 ----£~ 1 dIJ~ !t~-----,---i 1/2 This maps shows the preferred rol.ltes for walking to, school safely, Please .show your ehl!d the safest routes and teKh them good saflrty habits, such a5: 1. to stop at every corner and look all ways for oncoming vehlcles before crossing; 2. to walk qu1Ckly1 but don't run when crosslnR streets; 3. tD us• crusswalks, .stop signs.. traffic signals, school patrols, and adult erOS&lna guards; 4. where no walkways are provided, walk: on th~ left side of the-roadway as far off the travelled part of the roadway as poHlble, fating approaching traffic; 5. to wear bright c'.othlns. EXHIBIT 14 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUAlS-000239 of Application Date: April 10, 2015 Name: Campbell Short Plat Site Address: SW Corner of the interseciton of NE 9th St and Anacortes Ave NE, Renton, WA 98059 Plan -Planning Review Engineering Review Comments . · .. KamranYazdidoost I 425430, 7382 I kyazdidoost@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER SEWER STORM STREETS Water service will be provided by the City of Renton. Sewer service will be provided by the City of Renton. There is no formal storm conveyance system in NE 7th Street. There are no frontage improvements. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER The proposed development is within the City's water service area and in the Highlands 565 hydraulic zone. The development is outside of the City's aquifer protection areas. There is an existing 8 inch water main (see City water project plan no. W 2107) in NE 9th St. The 8 inch line can deliver 2,000 gallons per minute (gpm). The static water pressure is about 63 psi at elevation of 416 feet. There is an existing fire hydrant at the southwest corner of NE 9th St and Bremerton Ave NE which can deliver 1,000 gallons per minute. The hydrant is more than 300 feet away from the new southerly lot. The following water improvements will be required to provide water service for domestic use and for fire protection for the subject development: l. Installation of 1 inch minimum domestic water service line and meter to each lot. 2. Installation of an additional fire hydrant within 300 feet of each lot if required by Renton Fire Prevention Department and/or if the proposed single family dwellings will exceed 3,600 sq ft of gross area. 3. The development is subject to applicable water system development charges and water meter installations fee based on the size of the meters. 4. Civil plans for the water main extension will be required. SANITARY SEWER l. Sewer service is provided by the City of Renton. There is an existing 8 inch sewer main in NE 9TH Street. The applicant can connect directly to the 8 inch main sewer at NE 9TH street. 2. The development is subject to a wastewater system development charge (SDC) fee. The SDC fee for sewer is based on the size of the new domestic water to serve the new home on each lot. The sewer fee for a% inch or 1 inch meter install is $2,135.00. 3. This parcel is subject to a Special Assessment District. The East Renton Interceptor fee is $316.80 per lot. Payment of these fees will be required prior to issuance of the utility construction permit. 4. All plats shall provide separate side sewer stubs to each building lot prior to recording of the plat. SURFACE WATER l. A drainage plan and drainage report dated April 7, 2015 was submitted by Encompass Engineering and surveying. The proposed 2 lot subdivision, zoned R 8, is subject to Full Drainage Review in accordance with the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWM, Chapters 1 and 2. Based on the City's flow Ran: June 08, 2015 EXHIBIT 15 Page 1 of7 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUAlS-000239 of Engineering Review Comments, continued Kamran Yazdidoost f 425-430-7382 I kyazdidoost@rentonwa.gov control map, this site falls within the Flow Control Duration Standard, Forested Condition. Flow control BMPS required for this project per City of Renton Amendments to King County Storm Water Design Manual section 1.2.3.3. 2. The submitted drainage report includes the 8 core requirements, but includes only 5 special requirements. The special requirement #6 regarding aquifer protection area needs to be included in the drainage report (TIR) submitted with the utility construction permit. 3. Water quality is not required for this project per King County Storm Water Design Manual Amended by City of Renton section 1.2.8. Since the total proposed PGIS is less than SOOOSF. 4. Full dispersion is proposed in the plans for lot 1 and tract A and basic dispersion/limited infiltration is proposed for lot 2. Full dispersion, basic dispersion and limited infiltration must be designed and located per City of Renton Amendments to King County Storm Water Design Manual sections C.2.1 and C.2.4 and 5.4. Detention is not required for this project per King County Storm Water Design Manual Amended by City of Renton since the development of this project will result in less than 0.1 CFS increase of the 100 year runoff. 5. A geotechnical report, dated March 11, 2015 was submitted by Geospectrum Consultants Inc. The field study included 4 exploration pits on thel.92 acre site. These exploration pits were dug up to 6.5 feet in native's soil. No ground water was encountered on exploration pits number 1, 2 and 3 but seepage was observed at 2.5 foot. Fill soils encountered in exploration pit number 3 about 3 foot. Soil type encountered is Glaciation Till (QGT). The geotechnical report recommended full dispersion, basic dispersion and limited infiltration methods for BMP. The geotechnical report recommends full dispersion for lot 1, tract Band basic dispersion/limited infiltration for lot 2. 6. Surface water system development fee is $1,350.00 per new lot. Fees are payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. TRANSPORTATION/STREET 1. Existing right of way width in NE 9th Street is 30 feet. This street has been identified as a residential access street. To meet the City's new complete street standards, street improvements fronting this site will include 16 feet of pavement, an 8 foot planter strip, 5 foot sidewalk, 0.5 foot curb, and gutter. 2. A 20 feet wide joint access/utility easement road proposed. Lots 1 and 2 will get access via this road. 3. Traffic Impact Fees, Transportation impact fee is applicable on single family houses based on the applicable rate at the time of building permit, and payment is due at the time of issuance of the building permit. 4. The current transportation impact fee rate is $2,214.44 per new single family home. The transportation impact fee that is current at the time of building permit application will be levied. Payment of the transportation impact fee is due at the time of issuance of the building permit. 5. To meet the City's new complete street standards, street improvements fronting this site will include 16 feet of pavement, an 8 foot planter strip, 5 foot sidewalk, 0.5 foot curb, and gutter. 6. All electrical, phone, and cable services and lines serving the proposed development must be underground. The construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton inspector prior to recording the plat. 7. Mailbox locations shall be approved by the Post Office. 8. Paving and trench restoration will comply with the City's Trench Restoration and Overlay Requirements. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Separate permits and fees for water, sewer and stqrm connections will be required. 2. All construction utility permits for drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. A licensed Civil Engineer shall prepare the civil plans. 3. Rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height will be require a separate building permit. Structural calculations and plans shall be submitted for review by a licensed engineer. Special Inspection is required. Ran: June 08, 2015 Page 2 of7 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUAlS-000239 Engineering Review Comments, continued Kamran Yazdidoost I 425-430-7382 I kyazdidoost@rentonwa.gov 4. A tree removal and tree retention/protection plan and a separate landscape plan shall be included with the civil plan submittal. PLAN REVIEW RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. Flow control BMPS required for this project per City of Renton Amendments to King County Storm Water Design Manual section 1.2.3.3. 2. A City of Renton Public Utility easement is required over the entire private road. 3. The special requirement #6 regarding aquifer protection areas should be included in the drainage report submitted with the utility construction permit. 4. Foundation of new building must penetrate through the existing fill to bear on undisturbed very dense/hard natural soils. Building must have conventional spread footing to support the proposed structures. 5. Planter strip must be continued to proposed driveway. 6. Existing sidewalk at eastside of proposed driveway (Northeast corner) must be removed and relocated to align with proposed sidewalk at west side of proposed driveway. 7. Luminaire pole located at corner of Anacortes Ave NE and NE 9th St must be relocated to proposed planter strip at corner of Anacortes Ave NE and NE 9th ST. Fire Review -BUIiding Comments · >/ . . · .. · · . · .·. • . . < . • •·• Corey Thomas-• t 425'430-7024 I cthomas@rentor'l\1/if.gilv Recommendations: Environmental Impact Comments: 1. The fire impact fees are currently applicable at the rate of $495.10 per single family unit. Code Related Comments: 1. The fire flow requirement for a single family home is 1,000 gpm minimum for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet (including garage and basements). If the dwelling exceeds 3,600 square feet, a minimum of 1,500 gpm fire flow would be required. A minimum of one fire hydrant is required within 300 feet of the proposed buildings and two hydrants if the fire flow goes up to 1,500 gpm. Existing hydrants can be counted toward the requirements as long as they meet current code including 5 inch storz fittings. A minimum of one new hydrant shall be required as there are no hydrants within 300 feet of Lot 2. 2. Fire department apparatus access roadways are required to be a minimum of 20 feet wide fully paved, with 25 feet inside and 45 feet outside turning radius. Fire access roadways shall be constructed to support a 30 ton vehicle with 75 psi point loading. Access is required within 150 feet of all points on the buildings. Police Review Comments Cyndie Parks I 425-430'7521 I cparks@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: Minimal impact on police services. Community Services Comments . . Leslie Betlach l425·430'6619 I lbet1ach@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: Street trees -use only species that will achieve a large mature size and not Persica parrotia. Use only two street trees spaced 50' on-center and 30' from street light. Reduce proposal from four street trees to two. Parks impact fees per Ordinance 5670 applies. Ran: June 08, 2015 Page 3 of7 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUAlS-000239 .. Planning Review Comments Clark Close I 425-430-7289 I cclose@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: 1. RMC section 4 4 030.C.2 limits haul hours between eight thirty (8:30) a.m. and three thirty (3:30) p.m., Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 2. New single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays is by permission only. No work is permitted on Sundays. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plants appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 4. A National Permit Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required when more than one acre is being cleared. Technical Servlces,Comments .. , ··.. .. . .,,, · Bob l\llac O!!!EH 425'430-73691 bmaconie@rentonwa,gov Recommendations: Short Plat: Bob Mac Onie 04/30/2015 Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA15 000239 and LND20 0621, respectively, on the final short plat submittal. The dedication of right of way for short subdivisions requires a separate Deed of Dedication; provide a space to the recording number of same on the short plat. The Deed of Dedication document includes both a legal description exhibit and a map exhibit of the dedicated parcel. The legal description exhibit should be prepared, stamped, dated and signed by the applicant's surveyor. The surveyor should also prepare the map exhibit. The dedication process requires an updated Plat Certificate dated within 45 days of approval of said dedication. Talk to the Project Manager if there are questions or further information is needed. Show on the drawing the second tie to the City of Renton Survey Control Network (Mon #1849), and note what was found. Also note Monument Number 1848 on the drawing (lower left hand corner of the short plat submittal). Both of these monuments are noted under the "RENTON CONTROL MONUMENTS" block, but are not specifically referenced on the drawing. Provide sufficient information to determine how the plat boundary was established. Provide short plat and lot closure calculations. Note on the short plat drawing what was set at the corners of the proposed lots. Currently, what was set is noted under the "LEGEND" block, but the symbol is not shown on the drawing. Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if any. The city will provide addresses for the proposed lots as soon as possible. Note said addresses on the final short plat drawing. Ran: June 08, 2015 Page 4 of 7 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUAlS-000239 -----,,.·"·-~~,-r of Technical Services Comments, continued Bob Mac Onie I 425-430-7369 I bmaconie@rentonwa.gov Note all easements, covenants and agreements of record on the drawing. A 17.5 foot easement recorded under Rec. No. 8006240435 (shown along the south line of Tract A and Lot 2 of the subject short plat) is said "to be vacated" (in the future?). This transmission/distribution line was granted to Puget Sound Power in 1980. Is said easement to be vacated before the short plat is recorded? What is it's status? A 10 foot utility easement, recorded under Rec No. 8109020545 for City of Renton utilities, is shown along the north line of Tract A and Lot 1 of said short plat. It is noted that said easement was not noted on the underlying Lot Line Adjustment recorded under Rec No. 200402129000008. A 1 foot utility easement, recorded under Rec No 4043986 for Puget Sound Power, is also shown along the north line of said Tract A and said Lot 1, but was not noted on said underlying Lot Line Adjustment. Remove all point designations ("WF17", "WF18", etc.) shown on Tract A. Remove all catch basin information, sanitary sewer manhole information, gas lines, water lines, sewer lines, sidewalks, vertical curbs, etc. from the short plat submittal. Said data is not relevant for short plat recording. Note any relevant researched resources on the short plat submittal. Note that the property to the west of the subject short plat is "UNPLATIED". Remove the building setbacks lines. Setbacks will be determined when building permits are issued. The City of Renton Administrator, Public Works Department, is the only city official who signs the final short plat. Provide an appropriate approval block and signature line. Pertinent King County approval blocks also need to be noted on the drawing. Include a declaration block on the drawing, titled "OWNERS' DECLARATION" not "CERTIFICATION" or other. All vested owner(s) of the subject final short plat need to sign the final short plat drawing. Include notary blocks as needed. The Ticer Title Company title report, per Guarantee/Certificate No. 70020273, dated March 18, 2015, states that the subject short plat site is vested in Fred and Donna Alberts. The City of Renton Land Use Permit Master Application notes the Renton Church of the Nazerene as the property owner. The short plat submittal notes Pacific Peak Construction Review as the property owner (per Contract). Review all and resolve as needed. Remove the Property Owner, Engineer/Surveyor, Zoning, Proposed Net Density and Max. Allowable Density data from the right hand side of the subject submittal. Remove the City of Renton "SEAL" from the upper right hand corner of the submittal. The "VICINITY MAP" notes "MONROE AVE NE" to the west of the subject site. Said street should be noted as "UNION AVE NE". "UNION AVE NE" is shown east of the subject site and south of NE 4th St. It appears that NE 4th St is placed Ran: June 08, 2015 Page 5 of7 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUAlS-000239 Technical Services Comments, continued Bob Mac Onie I 425-430-7369 [ bmaconie@rentonwa.gov too close (on the map) under the subject site. Add a north arrow to the "VICINITY MAP". Review and alter as needed. Because the subject property falls within Zone 2 of the City of Renton Aquifer Protection Area, the Aquifer Protection Notice needs to be noted on the drawing. AQUIFER PROTECTION NOTICE The lots created herein fall within Zone 2 of Renton's aquifer protection area and are subject to the requirements of the City of Renton Ordinance #4367. This city's sole source of drinking water is supplied from a shallow aquifer under the city surface. There is no natural barrier between the water table and ground surface. Extreme care should be exercised when handling of any liquid substance other than water to protect from contact with the ground surface. It is the homeowner's responsibility to protect the city's drinking water. Note that if there are easements, restrictive covenants or agreements to others (City of Renton, etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the final short plat. The final short plat drawing and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. The recording number(s) for the associated document(s) are to be referenced on the final short plat drawing. Provide spaces for the recording numbers thereof. The new easements for ingress, egress, utilities, etc. shown for the benefit of future owners of the proposed lots each need a note defining the rights associated with the easement at issue. Since these new "proposed" easements shown aren't "granted and conveyed" until the benefited and/or burdened lots are conveyed to others add the following language on the face of the short plat drawing: DECLARATION OF COVENANT: The owners of the land embraced within this short plat, in return for the benefit to accrue from this subdivision, by signing hereon covenant and agree to convey the beneficial interest in the new private easements shown on this short plat to any and all future purchasers of the lots, or of any subdivisions thereof. This covenant shall run with the land as shown on this short plat. The preceding statement obligates the seller of the lots created to "expressly grant and convey" the lots "together with and/or subject to" any new private easements delineated on the short plat in the conveying document. The private ingress, egress and utility easement require a "New Private Easement for Ingress, Egress and Utilities Maintenance Agreement" statement. Include the following statement on the short plat: NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT The Native Growth Protection Easement (NPGE) on this short plat identifies the steep slopes. The creation of the Easement conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the Easement Area. This interest shall be for the purpose of preserving native vegetation for the control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, visual and aural buffering, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The Easement imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the Easement area enforceable on behalf of the public by the City of Renton, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the Easement area. The vegetation with the Easement area may not be cut, pruned covered by fill, removed or damaged without express written permission from the City of Renton, provided however, that the owners of underlying property may install landscaping. The right of entry herein shall apply to the agents, representatives and employees of the owners or subsequent owners of the underlying property. Ran: June 08, 2015 Page 6 of7 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUAlS-000239 of Technical Services Comments, continued Bob Mac Onie I 425-430-7369 I bmaconie@rentonwa.gov Include the following on the short plat TRACT NOTES A 'Tract' is land reserved for specified uses, including, but not limited to reserve tracts, recreation, open space, critical areas, surface water retention, utility facilities and access. Tracts are not considered building sites for the purposes of residential dwelling. Tract 'A' is a Wetland and Storm Drainage tract. An easement is hereby granted and conveyed to the City of Renton over, under and across Tract 'A' for the purpose of conveying, storing, managing and facilitating storm and surface water per the engineering plans on file with the City of Renton. The City of Renton has the right to enter said stormwater easement for the purpose of inspecting, operating, maintaining, improving, and repairing it's drainage facilities contained therein. Tract 'A' is subject to a Native Growth Protection Easement as defined hereon. Development, alteration, or disturbance within the tract is prohibited except for purposes of habitat enhancement as part of an enhancement project which has received prior written approval from the City. Ran: June 08, 2015 Page 7 of 7 ~I7~J1ftrJ1JO NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) A M-Appllcatkln hu bttn HIid and 1cceptad with 11H1 Oe1>1rtm1ntofCommunlty • Etonomlc °"""lopmont (O:DI-P!1m1nt DMslan oll;hl City of Ront..,. Thi followlna briefly ducrlbel I"" 1ppijQtlon 111111M ~ Pul:lllcllppN>YIIL DATE OFNDffC!OfAPPUCAnDN: April 15, lDIS WOUSENUMBfR: 1.UA.l..S-000239, ECF, St!PI.-A PROJECT NAME! Umpbell Short Pia! PROJ!CT DE.SCIIIPTION, The appllcam Is requestln& 1pprov1I al a 2·lal sl>Dn plat of a •acant 83.42& '1111'1'" foot IJ.92 IO'flj pa,wl for tile Mlli'l! de,eiopmtnt of 2 sin~lamlly homes. The 11te Is loated at the SW corner of the lnte<>tctlon of M; 9th 5r and Macorus Aw NE !MN l0HD5909S) wjtnJn the RHklenUal-8 dMlll"I units P'"' acre (R·&l mne. Tht! Pfll!IO<ed IOl!l 131110 In,..., from 1,912 SF tu 13,445 Sfln arawlth an ,....,,.,o lDI slzo of 10,679 SF.~ ,H, wUI al>o tontlln I cMtk::11 ,,,.. tn,c:t fTrxt A) th•I i, 57,434 SF and a sh111!d drl""'"'t llr,11:t Bf 1h,t ir. 1,807 SF. Tho rHidonllal density Is 4.(1;1 <IIIN!l"I unit> II"' nm acra. Aa:ou to !111 ,ho Is •I.I a ...... ,honid <irtvaw•¥ fram NE 9th St. Holf-,trHt fmnqp i'npre\'tmlnts wlll l>o tomplatad alon1 NE 9th St. Tho ski lncludu • 26,101 SF o"!lfl• crnkll area (C•t•Pl' l wetl1nd~ I" !hi \011\h we.iertv pardon of 1he proporty, roqultln1 • SO-foot bul'for. Tllore are 171 1;roes on,tbL Tl-. -lil:lnt II p,upoojn1 ID .. 1:1tn 141 Uou ~thin tile Cl1dal oreos 1rv;I bilffwrs •nd 11 trees tilrouat,OYl lhe rHI: ofth• 1ito. Th.,1!11 pnor.Uy slopo1 do..., to tho soutlrwolt ot 1ppro,lmoblly ICM.A <0mbln1tlon of full and buk: 01sl)!Dkln wjl be LISff, d!Khargir,c oow.11rd1 the onslll wetlard. Tho applicant has subrnlttod 111 Artlo~lt Report, We~al!d R1conn;11«1nc.o, Gel>lech"l"'I rnainee~na: StUO'/, and I Prollmlnary Techllic:ol lnfl1rm1tan R•port ~th tho appllcalion. PROJECT LOCATION, QVTlONAI. DntRMINotllON OF NON·5UiNll'ICfMCf, ll,llfTIGlilUI jDN$-MI: .... Iha I.Qd Apncy, ti11 City af Ronlan hu dol•nnlnad !hot ,1gnlfte11nt HIVn>nm11ntll lmpacb ""' unllkllly to mull [tom tho p,_...t proJ1ct. Tho,ofor1. as pumln1d ul!dor tho RCW 0.21C.110, U... City of Renton I.I u,11111 !M Op!lonol DNS--M process to i[MI no!1<11 lhat i ONS-M b likely to bl i.sued. Comment periods for !he praject and the proposed ONS-M are lnt•grated Into a ~0111 comment ?MO(I. Ther. "''N bl na tomment porkld followln1 the l5'Ulnal of tho Threshold Oel:<!nnlnlllon of N,.,_ Sll'\lfltlnn-Mltlptld (ONs-'-1). Thl1 may be tne onl-1 opponullity to commont on the onvln,nmentlj lml>l'<I> of tho P"'~"''"I. R 14-doy 1ppo1I penod MIi folk,w It-. "'""-of l;ho 01115-M. NOTICE Of CoM,L£n APP'IJCATlON: APPIJCANT/PROJECI" OONTACTPfRSOff1 Aprll 10,2015 Aprll 15. 2015 Tom Rlddlntl/ --~ .. li5urve'111111/ 165 NEJ,.,lpor St., 5'-201/ 1saqup, WA !IIIIZ7 / a!.-192-0250 I ------ A<borlsl: bPOn. Wilu.ntl Rtall'l ....... ra, 1n1._ Ro,,ort. :orwll GeoiadlniAI~ 11 you would IH«i 10 bll made, party af record 10 ,ocolve lurtl,er ,n/onnatlon on !hb [)r<lposed project, contp~q this form and rll,n, to: City of Renton, CEO -Planllin1 OMslon, 1055 So. Grady W1y, Renton. WA 98057. ~FIie No .. CMnpbellShort Plat/LUA15-0002l9. [CF, SHPl-A NAME; --------------------------- M,IJUNGA0DAESS: ____________ (l1Y/STAIT/ZIP: _______ _ TE!..EPHCJNE~.: ----------- location whe,e appllc,tlon m•r be roviwted: CONSIITTtlCl' OVERVlWol: lonlnl/land UH: Envlronm..,talDoaln'Hlntslll;tt Eval-tht Propo,ed Project: o,...ropmom Rt(lll1tlon1 u,..i For PrGjoct Mltlptlon: Dep • of Community & Etonarnl< 01v1lopment (CEDI-Plannlr,c DM1lon, 51.U. Floor Renton City Ha~, 1055 Sou!h Grady Wrt, Renton, WA 9aos1 The subject s,te r, desianmd Ruldontlal 5in&I• family !R51 on th• City of Ronton Comprohan,ivo land UH '-lap ond Raldontlol-8 (R-8] an th1 City", ZolllneMap. Environmental (SEPA) Chetkll.i: The projKI WIN be S11bject to th• City", SE.PA ordinance. RMC 4-i-UOA; 4+03D; 4""4+50; ol+o7G: 4-6-olO; ~ o$-7-070: 4-7-170; ,od other applicable cO<IH ond '"1ul1t1on, "' ,~prapriate. ProposadMhlptl011Musur•: Tho followina Ml!ll'ltlcn Ma .. u ... wrn llka/y bl!l lmpmod on tho prop"'ad ~mjoct. Thai rKDITlfflended Ml!iplkm MUSIi,... addnm project impacts not covered by ..in1n1 todes 111d rqulatioos .. cited abcr,e. Tin, appllmnt Ibo.I a,mpli, wlll, 1M ,..._, doll<, D lrxhnJMJ &, U.. Goatmanlml Enflnnrlng f""'wth,n, P,.,..,,.,, hv ~m ComtJtantf, IK. daNd Mana 1J,. 2415 araa upt/ar.l ffpotf a,bmined ar <f latJlr -Commt!ltl on ttie•-1P,llc&UD11 mLIJt H submitted 1ft wrttrnsto crm H, Clos., A$1oc1m Plam..-, Clll -Plaftnlr,c OlvidlHI, 11155 Sault, Grady Woy,-, WA 911!157, by 5:00 PM an Ap,tl l9, ?(Ill. tfyou h•va qUdllons about th'.> proposal, or wish ta bl midi a party of record and receive 1ddldo'1* no~llatlon by mall, tontact the Ptojlct Manqo,. A""fono wl>:i submits wntten commoor, w!( autom,~c.1111 bec<lmt! a party of re:Dl'd -,<I wlll be M~Mod of •nv dtcl~on "" lhl• pn:,Ject A<»~V af 11,e ,ub""'(Utlll thrwfflokl -nnh1tlon I• ov,llabll upon ,oquo,t. CONTACT PERSON: Clark H. Close, Associate Planner; Tel: {425) 430-7289; Email: cclose@rentonwa.gov CERTIFICATION 1, l L,/'11'4'.'-l-f · CLOsE hereby certify that s copies of the above document were posted in __3____ conspicuous places or nearby the described property on Date: __ lf:..:/..:..1.:..a', /'-'('--'':> _____ _ Signed:-1.C(,wt:.::::::~~.!:.(/.~a__,£::::::::===--- STATE OF WASHINGTON 55 COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that _ _.r_· =w..-..u.--"-'=.:....----- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. J ,, Notary l blic in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print): __ ... t.!..\'"'-· u""':j""".....JP.J,c ... ).s:.v':.,,er_,,_------- My appointment expires:. ___ A=iQ!l-. "-"'"·1..__.,'.,l;;:iq_, 1 ---'d"'("-;'-/ -..c1 _____ _ On the 15th day of April, 2015, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Notice of application and Acceptance documents. This information was sent to: Agencies Tom Redding, Encompass Engineering Peter St. Pierre, Forest Contracting Renton Church of the Nazerene 300' Surrounding Property Owners (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING See Attached Contact Applicant Owner See Attached / ,,,,\\\\\\\\11 .::-''" 1,,.I.. Y Po 1,,,,, ~ ~o~.,. .. ~1,11 '1,z,,,,... ,11 -S' ~11, ,:..,.. I = .::-~,. ~ ~ ;: § +OT-4_,, ~ (J') ~. -..... -c,;: :.4 i.~ ; I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Sabrina Mirante 3 en~ • •. i:! S signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary ac,t ~ih~ ~~c:.rnd jurprfses mentioned in the instrument. \ ~ ~,~,,/9-11,,"'':6 -.-" '·, O.,.c,, ,,\\\\'"'''"' 6' _--: ',,, WASl1\~ --~-,, ...... ,,,, ,,,,, Dated: /\-1 / /5 I Notary (Print): ____ --'g ... -.,""\\._;+.\-· __,J?~,-.:...·'-"""'"""(t:...>:...------------- My appointment expires: 1 ,J I JC I? /luj V,' ,"')qi Campbell Short Plat LUAlS-000239, ECF, SHPL-A template • affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology •• Environmental Review Section PO Box47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region * Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers • Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers ••• Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 35030 SE Douglas St. #210 Snoqualmie, WA 98065 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Timothy C. Croll, Attn: SEPA Responsible Official 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology '* Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept.** Attn: Misty Blair Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 39015 -172"' Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program""" 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Laura Murphy Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program** Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Erin Slaten Ms. Shirley Marroquin 39015172"' Avenue SE 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 WDFW -Larry Fisher' Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Gretchen Kaehler Issaquah, WA 98027 PO Box48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Tim McHarg Attn: Acting Community Dev. Director Director of Community Development 220 Fourth Avenue South 12835 Newcastle Way, Ste 200 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Newcastle, WA 98056 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Wendy Weiker, Community Svcs. Mgr. Jack Pace, Responsible Official 355 110" Ave NE 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Mailstop EST llW Tukwila, WA 98188 Bellevue, WA 98004 Puget Sound Energy Doug Corbin, Municipal Liaison Mgr. 6905 South 228" St Kent, WA 98032 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. **Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov ** Karen Walter, Laura Murphy and Erin Slaten with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. are emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email addresses: KWalter@muckleshoot.nsn.us / Laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us L erin.slaten@muckleshoot.nsn.us "'Department of Natural Resources is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice the following email address: sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov template -affidavit of service by mailing Renton Church of the Nazarene 850 Union Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Peter St Pierre Forest Contracting, Inc. 27018 233rd Pl SE Maple Vallev. WA 98038 Chad Allen Encompass Engineering & Surveying 165 NE Juniper St Issaquah. WA 98027 Peter St Pierre Pacific Peak Construction Services Inc 4004 NE 19th St Renton, WA 98056 MBP Integration MBP Integration Tom Redding Encompass Engineering & Surveying 165 NE Juniper St, Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 ~561450180 5561450100 5561450101 3ARUT-DEL FIERRO VANESSA M+ BETANCOURT JESUS+MARIA GUAD BETANCOURT JESUS+MARIA GUAD 1312 NE 9TH PL 4335 NE 9TH Pl 4335 NE 9th Pl ~ENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 9510940050 5561450210 9510940150 3UIVY BUTLER ERIC J CHAMBERS JANENE M 350 BREMERTON AVE NE 4330 NE 9TH Pl 873 BREMERTON AVE NE ~ENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 5561450080 9510940130 9510940060 :HANG KENNETH J+SANDY WK CHAPIN TYSON & AMY CHEUNG FUNG KIU+CHAU ANH D 1345 NE 9TH Pl PO BOX 695 856 BREMERTON AVE NE ~ENTON, WA 98059 LONGVIEW, WA 98632 RENTON, WA 98059 5561450050 9510940070 9510940120 :HI KHAN SAU CHOW STEPHEN DHANENS JOEL H4 ANACORTES AVE NE 862 BREMERTON AVE NE 2309 VASHON CT NE ~ENTON, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 9510940090 9510940030 5561450070 )ICKAU AMY R+SMITH K DOUGLAS DURANTE LARRY T DURKIN TIMOTHY+BRIGITIE 374 BREMERTON AVE NE 816 BREMERTON AVE NE 902 ANACORTES AVE NE ~ENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 9510940170 1023059007 1023059121 :WING BRET W+MOLLIE S FACILITIES & OPERATIONS CTR FACILITIES & OPERATIONS CTR 1457 NE 9TH ST 300SW7TH ST 300SW7TH ST ~ENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 5561450200 9510940080 9510940140 'UNG HELEN PUI-LING ET Al GAUTAM-PRAT AP DANIEL S+SHOB HOANG KIM THUY T 1324 NE 9TH PL PO BOX 3244 867 BREMERTON AVE NE ~ENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98059 5561450190 9510940180 3449900060 -iOSKOVICH JOSEPH A HUANG XIONGMING & HUIZHI HUYNH PHUONG Q+PHOI G PHU B18 NE 9TH PL 4451 NE 9TH ST 4223 NE 9TH PL ~ENTON, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98055 5561450170 5561450171 5561450090 IERNIGAN JANICE RAGNA JERNIGAN JANICE RAGNA KAR-GUAN TAY MICHAEL 10525 CRESTWOOD DRS 4306 NE 9th Pl 4341 NE 9TH PL iEATILE, WA 98178 Renton, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 5561450160 9510940040 5561450110 <ATOALANA LAU CONITA+YIU EDDIE+FRANKI LIANG GEMMY & ANNIE BOO NE 9TH PL 826 BREMERTON AVE NE 289 MONTECITO DR ~ENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 SATELLITE BEACH, FL 32937 5561450111 9510940110 1023059075 _JANG GEMMY & ANNIE LY ANNA ML KING JR BAPTISH CHURCH B31 NE 9th Pl 866 BREMERTON AVE NE PO BOX 2145 ~enton, VI/A 98059 RENTON, VI/A 98059 RENTON, VI/A 98055 9510940100 5561450120 9510940200 VIAi DIANE THU+MAI THANH VAN MAK IVY MUI-HANG MISHKOV IOSIF 380 BREMERTON AVE 4325 NE 9TH PL 2471 S 224TH ST ~ENTON, VI/A 98059 RENTON, VI/A 98059 DES MOINES, VI/A 98198 9510940160 5561450130 5561450220 \JGUYEN HUNG T +HA THI NGOC VU NGUYEN KIEN+BETIY OCHS RICHARD J+ROSEMARY M 387 BREMERTO AVE NE 4317 NE 9TH PL 4336 NE 9TH PL ~ENTON, VI/A 98056 RENTON, VI/A 98059 RENTON, VI/A 98059 5561450060 5561450240 5561450241 'AN NGOC+MING T PHU HOA DON+HUY DON PHU HOA DON+HUY DON 308 ANACORTES AVE NE 3710 NE 10TH LN 951 Anacortes Ave NE ~ENTON, VI/A 98059 RENTON, VI/A 98056 Renton, VI/A 98059 5561450040 1023059095 1023059078 >ORTA CONSTANCE J RENTON CHURCH OF NAZARENE RENTON CHURCH OF NAZARENE 320 ANACORTES AVE NE PO B0X2640 PO BOX 2640 ~ENTON, VI/A 98059 RENTON, VI/A 98016 RENTON, VI/A 98056 5561450150 5561450140 5561450141 ;HJOYAMA GEORGE SCOTT +LYNNE SUTHERLAND DARRELL S SUTHERLAND DARRELL S BOl NE 9TH PL 689 HALIDON VI/AY 4311 NE 9th Pl ~ENTON, VI/A 98059 FOLSOM, CA 95630 Renton, VI/A 98059 3449900050 5561450230 NALSH CHRISTOPHER+SHERI YU JACY J+CHIN VI/ESLEY C 302 VASHON PL NE 4342 NE 9TH PL ~ENTON, VI/A 98059 RENTON, VI/A 98059 Leslie Betlach ----- Plan Review Routing Slip Plan Number: LUAlS-000239 Name: Campbell Short Plat Site Address: SW corner of the intersection of NE 9th St and Anacortes Ave NE Description: The applicant is requesting approval of a 2-lot short plat of a vacant 83,428 square foot (1.92 acres) parcel for the future development of 2 single-family homes. The site is located at the SW corner of the intersection of NE 9th St and Anacortes Ave NE (APN 1023059095) within the Residential-8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zone. The proposed lots range in size from 7,912 SF to 13,445 SF in area with an average lot size of 10,679 SF. The site will also contain a critical area tract (Tract A) that is 57,434 SF and a shared driveway (Tract B) that is 1,807 SF. The residential density is 4.08 dwelling units per net acre. Access to the site is via a single shared driveway from NE 9th St. Half-street frontage improvements will be completed along NE 9th St. The site includes a 26,107 SF onsite critical area (Category 2 wetland), in the south westerly portion of the property, requiring a SO-foot buffer. There are 172 trees onsite. The applicant is proposing to retain 142 trees within the critical areas and buffers and 11 trees throughout the rest of the site. The site generally slopes down to the southwest at approximately 10%. A combination of full and basic dispersion will be used, discharging towards the onsite wetland. The applicant has submitted an Arborist Report, Wetland Reconnaissance, Geotechnical Engineering Study, and a Preliminary Technical Information Report with the application. --·--····-·---···------···---- Review Type: Date Assigned: Community Services Review-Version 1 04/15/2015 Date Due: 04/29/2015 Project Manager: Clark Close Environmental Impact Earth Animals Air Envi ronmenta I Hea I th Water Energy/Natural Resources Plants -fr u .. \. Housing Land/Shoreline Use Aesthetics Where to enter your comments: Manage My Reviews Which types of comments should be entered: Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Service Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environmental 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Recommendation -Comments that impact the project including any of the Enivornmental Impacts above. Correction -Corrections to the project that need to be made before the review can be completed and /or requesting submittal of additional documentation and/or resubmittal of existing documentation. What statuses should be used: Reviewed -I have reviewed the project and have no comments. Reviewed with Comments -I have reviewed the project and and I have comments entered in Recommendations . Correction/Resubmit -I have reviewed the project and the applicant needs to submit and/or resubmit documentation and I have added corrections in Corrections. S-h-e,) iYct_: -";>{_ e,.\~ 5f~rS -(tt#J iv)!( C", cl\iiv-t e, (a,'f 1,1ak_,v _(~-.R 'i tt}t PL4>&'t\-:Ptt,l\.>+.c . c.d-1.e ,s.·f _ u Se c ~.)l -1"W"" S ~ ~J( 5-y" l( f' -60 ( 6/\ -~ ct-A3 0 / ~,vi s +ro.J I )w' t::iu,lu<..( rrv ~ ~ < [ ~ i, ~ l-c.J +.,.u..r -ta DI • PCll)/kJ <2m~ ~ f2v7 ~~a/Vic.<_ .su7B ~ ~A./2µLJ) 7-?-ctzo. d < 4-z.o -/.:5 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Denis Law Mayor April 15, 2015 Tom Redding Encompass Engineering & Surveying 165 NE Juniper St., Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 --,.,<a City 0L1~---~; 1 (_) ( *' ~1 n 1Lt00.1 ~-.1. ;~ ) ~~ ~ , l.\ j lJ I?~~ Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator Subject: Notice of Complete Application Campbell Short Plat, LUAlS-000239, ECF, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Redding: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. it is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on May 18, 2015. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7289 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Clark H. Close Associate Planner cc: Renton Church of the Nazarene/ Owner(s) Peter St. Pierre, Forest Contracting LLC / Applicant Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way , Renton, Washington 98057 , rentonwa.gov NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: LAND USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: April 15, 2015 LUA15-000239, ECF, SHPL-A Campbell Short Plat PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of a 2-lot short plat of a vacant 83,428 square foot (1.92 acres) parcel for the future development of 2 single-family homes. The site is located at the SW corner of the intersection of NE 9th St and Anacortes Ave NE (APN 1023059095) within the Residential-& dwelling units per acre (R-8) zone. The proposed lots range in size from 7,912 SF to 13,445 SF in area with an average lot size of 10,679 SF. The site will also contain a critical area tract (Tract A) that is 57,434 SF and a shared driveway (Tract B) that is 1,807 SF. The residential density is 4.08 dwelling units per net acre. Access to the site is via a single shared driveway from NE 9th St. Half-street frontage improvements will be completed along NE 9th St. The site includes a 26,107 SF onsite critical area (Category 2 wetland), in the south westerly portion of the property, requiring a SO-foot buffer. There are 172 trees onsite. The applicant is proposing to retain 142 trees within the critical areas and buffers and 11 trees throughout the rest of the site. The site generally slopes down to the southwest at approximately 10%. A combination of full and basic dispersion will be used, discharging towards the onsite wetland. The applicant has submitted an Arborist Report, Wetland Reconnaissance, Geotechnical Engineering Study, and a Preliminary Technical Information Report with the application. PROJECT LOCATION: SW corner of the intersection of NE 9th St and Anacortes Ave NE OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated (DNS-M). This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: April 10, 201S April 15, 2015 Tom Redding/ Encompass Engineering & Surveying/ 165 NE Juniper St., Ste 201 / Issaquah, WA 98027 / 42S-392-0250 / tredding@encompasses.net Environmental (SEPA) Review, Short Plat Building Arborist Report, Wetland Reconnaissance, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED -Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: Campbell Short Plat/ LUA15-000239, ECF, SHPL-A NAM Ee---------------------------------- MAILING ADDRESS: ________________ CITY/STATE/ZIP: _________ _ TELEPHONE NO.c --------------- Location where application 1 be reviewed: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Proposed Mitigation Measures: Department of Community & Economic Development (CED)-Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 The subject site is designated Residential Single Family (RS) on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Residential-8 (R-8) on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental (SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-2-llOA; 4-4-030; 4-4-060; 4-6--070; 4-6--030; 4-6-060; 4-7-070; 4-7-170; and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations induded in the Geotechnlc:al Engineering Evaluation, prepared by Geospectrum Consultants, Inc. dated March 11, 2015 or an updated report submitted at a later date. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Clark H. Close, Associate Planner, CED -Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on April 29, 2015. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination is available upon request. CONTACT PERSON: Clark H. Close, Associate Planner; Tel: (425} 430-7289; Email: cclose@rentonwa.gov PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION CITY OF RENTO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: July 15, 2015 To: City Clerk's Office From: Sabrina Mirante Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office I Project Name: ~bt.1)., CrrHee Short Plat ' LUA (file) Number: 1 LUA-15-000239, ECF, SHPL-A , Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Clark H. Close Acceptance Date: April 15, 2015 1, Applicant: Peter St. Pierre i Owner: Renton Church of the Nazarene I Contact: Tom Redding, Encompass Engineering & Surveying ,, I PID Number: 1023059095 ERC Determination: DNS-M Date: June 22, 2015 Anneal Period Ends: Julv 10. 2015 Administrative Decision: Approved with Conditions Date: June 22, 2015 Anneal Period Ends: Julv 10. 2015 Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Anneal Period Ends: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: The applicant is requesting approval of a 2-lot short plat of a vacant 83,428 square foot (1.92 acres) parcel for the future development of 2 single-family homes. The site is located at the SW corner of the intersection of NE 9th St and Anacortes Ave NE (APN 1023059095) within the Residential-8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zone. The proposed lots range in size from 7 912 SF to 13.445 SF in area with an averaae lot size of 10.679 SF. Location: SW Corner of the intersection of NE 9th St and Anacortes Ave NE, 98059 Comments: ERC Determination Types: DNS -Determination of Non-Significance; DNS-M -Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated; DS -Determination of Significance. ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUA 15-000239 Application Date: April 10, 2015 Name: Campbell Short Plat Plan • Planni Site Address: Version 1 I July 15, 2015 Recommendations: 1. RMC section 4 4 030.C.2 limits haul hours between eight thirty (8:30) a.m. and three thirty (3:30) p.m., Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 2. New single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays is by permission only. No work is permitted on Sundays. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plants appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 4. A National Permit Dischar e Elimination S stem NPDES ermit is re uired when more than one acre is bein cleared. Recommendations: Environmental Impact Comments: 1. The fire impact fees are currently applicable at the rate of $495.1 O per single family unit. Code Related Comments: 1. The fire fiow requirement for a single family home is 1,000 gpm minimum for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet (including garage and basements). If the dwelling exceeds 3,600 square feet, a minimum of 1,500 gpm fire flow would be required. A minimum of one fire hydrant is required within 300 feet of the proposed buildings and two hydrants if the fire flow goes up to 1,500 gpm. Existing hydrants can be counted toward the requirements as long as they meet current code including 5 inch storz fittings. A minimum of one new hydrant shall be required as there are no hydrants within 300 feet of Lot 2. 2. Fire department apparatus access roadways are required to be a minimum of 20 feet wide fully paved, with 25 feet inside and 45 feet outside turning radius. Fire access roadways shall be constructed to support a 30 ton vehicle with 75 psi point loading. Access is re uired within 150 feet of all oints on the build in s. Recommendations: Short Plat: Bob Mac Onie 04/30/2015 Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA15 000239 and LND20 0621, respectively, on the final short plat submittal. The dedication of right of way for short subdivisions requires a separate Deed of Dedication; provide a space to the recording number of same on the short plat. The Deed of Dedication document includes both a legal description exhibit and a map exhibit of the dedicated parcel. The legal description exhibit should be prepared, stamped, dated and signed by the applicant's surveyor. The surveyor should also prepare the map exhibit. The dedication process requires an updated Plat Certificate dated within 45 days of approval of said dedication. Talk to the Project Manager if there are questions or further information is needed. Show on the drawing the second tie to the City of Renton Survey Control Network (Mon #1849), and note what was found. Also note Monument Number 1848 on the drawing (lower left hand corner of the short plat submittal). Both of these monuments are noted under the "RENTON CONTROL MONUMENTS" block, but are not specifically referenced on the drawing Provide sufficient information to determine how the plat boundary was established. Provide short plat and lot closure calculations. Note on the short plat drawing what was set at the corners of the proposed lots. Currently, what was set is noted under the "LEGEND" block, but the symbol is not shown on the drawing. Ran: July 15, 2015 Page 1 of 3 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUA 15-000239 Version 1 I July 15, 2015 Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if any. The city will provide addresses for the proposed lots as soon as possible. Note said addresses on the final short plat drawing. Note all easements, covenants and agreements of record on the drawing. A 17 .5 foot easement recorded under Rec. No. 8006240435 (shown along the south line of Tract A and Lot 2 of the subject short plat) is said "to be vacated" (in the future?). This transmission/distribution line was granted to Puget Sound Power in 1980. Is said easement to be vacated before the short plat is recorded? What is it's status? A 10 foot utility easement, recorded under Rec No. 8109020545 for City of Renton utilities, is shown along the north line of Tract A and Lot 1 of said short plat. It is noted that said easement was not noted on the underlying Lot Line Adjustment recorded under Rec No 200402129000008. A 1 foot utility easement, recorded under Rec No 4043986 for Puget Sound Power, is also shown along the north line of said Tract A and said Lot 1, but was not noted on said underlying Lot Line Adjustment. Remove all point designations ("WF17", "WF18", etc.) shown on Tract A. Remove all catch basin information, sanitary sewer manhole information, gas lines, water lines, sewer lines, sidewalks, vertical curbs, etc. from the short plat submittal. Said data is not relevant for short plat recording. Note any relevant researched resources on the short plat submittal. Note that the property to the west of the subject short plat is "UNPLATIED". Remove the building setbacks lines. Setbacks will be determined when building permits are issued. The City of Renton Administrator, Public Works Department, is the only city official who signs the final short plat. Provide an appropriate approval block and signature line. Pertinent King County approval blocks also need to be noted on the drawing. Include a declaration block on the drawing, titled "OWNERS' DECLARATION" not "CERTIFICATION" or other. All vested owner(s) of the subject final short plat need to sign the final short plat drawing. Include notary blocks as needed. The licor Title Company title report, per Guarantee/Certificate No. 70020273, dated March 18, 2015, states that the subject short plat site is vested in Fred and Donna Alberts. The City of Renton Land Use Permit Master Application notes the Renton Church of the Nazerene as the property owner. The short plat submittal notes Pacific Peak Construction Review as the property owner (per Contract). Review all and resolve as needed. Remove the Property Owner, Engineer/Surveyor, Zoning, Proposed Net Density and Max. Allowable Density data from the right hand side of the subject submittal. Remove the City of Renton "SEAL" from the upper right hand corner of the submittal. The "VICINITY MAP" notes "MONROE AVE NE" to the west of the subject site. Said street should be noted as "UNION AVE NE". "UNION AVE NE" is shown east of the subject site and south of NE 4th St. It appears that NE 4th St is placed too close (on the map) under the subject site. Add a north arrow to the "VICINITY MAP". Review and alter as needed. Because the subject property falls within Zone 2 of the City of Renton Aquifer Protection Area, the Aquifer Protection Notice needs to be noted on the drawing. AQUIFER PROTECTION NOTICE The lots created herein fall within Zone 2 of Renton's aquifer protection area and are subject to the requirements of the City of Renton Ran: July 15, 2015 Page 2 of 3 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUA 15-000239 Plan -Planning Review Version 1 I July 15, 2015 Ordinance #4367. This city's sole source of drinking water is supplied from a shallow aquifer under the city surface. There is no natural barrier between the water table and ground surface. Extreme care should be exercised when handling of any liquid substance other than water to protect from contact with the ground surface. It is the homeowner's responsibility to protect the city's drinking water. Note that if there are easements, restrictive covenants or agreements to others (City of Renton, etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the final short plat. The final short plat drawing and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. The recording number(s) for the associated document(s) are to be referenced on the final short plat drawing. Provide spaces for the recording numbers thereof. The new easements for ingress, egress, utilities, etc. shown for the benefit of future owners of the proposed lots each need a note defining the rights associated with the easement at issue. Since these new "proposed" easements shown aren't "granted and conveyed" until the benefited and/or burdened lots are conveyed to others add the following language on the face of the short plat drawing: DECLARATION OF COVENANT: The owners of the land embraced within this short plat, in return for the benefit to accrue from this subdivision, by signing hereon covenant and agree to convey the beneficial interest in the new private easements shown on this short plat to any and all future purchasers of the lots, or of any subdivisions thereof. This covenant shall run with the land as shown on this short plat. The preceding statement obligates the seller of the lots created to "expressly grant and convey" the lots "together with and/or subject to" any new private easements delineated on the short plat in the conveying document. The private ingress, egress and utility easement require a "New Private Easement for Ingress, Egress and Utilities Maintenance Agreement" statement. Include the following statement on the short plat: NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT The Native Growth Protection Easement (NPGE) on this short plat identifies the steep slopes. The creation of the Easement conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the Easement Area. This interest shall be for the purpose of preserving native vegetation for the control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, visual and aural buffering, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The Easement imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the Easement area enforceable on behalf of the public by the City of Renton, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the Easement area. The vegetation with the Easement area may not be cut, pruned covered by fill, removed or damaged without express written permission from the City of Renton, provided however, that the owners of underlying property may install landscaping. The right of entry herein shall apply to the agents, representatives and employees of the owners or subsequent owners of the underlying property. Include the following on the short plat TRACT NOTES A 'Tract' is land reserved for specified uses, including, but not limited to reserve tracts, recreation, open space, critical areas, surface water retention, utility facilities and access. Tracts are not considered building sites for the purposes of residential dwelling. Tract 'A' is a Wetland and Storm Drainage tract. An easement is hereby granted and conveyed to the City of Renton over, under and across Tract 'A' for the purpose of conveying, storing, managing and facilitating storm and surface water per the engineering plans on file with the City of Renton. The City of Renton has the right to enter said stonmwater easement for the purpose of inspecting, operating, maintaining, improving, and repairing it's drainage facilities contained therein. Tract 'A' is subject to a Native Growth Protection Easement as defined hereon. Development, alteration, or disturbance within the tract is prohibited except for purposes of habitat enhancement as part of an enhancement ro'ect which has received rior written a roval from the Ci . Ran: July 15, 2015 Page 3 of 3 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ' yr~;,.·!W;1';':.:'1s·,;~~4~~t&.~*t~);s't~.a$;~~'/li\!lfUf~$¥·.:,iMt~_,..i..;/~r.rtW.r~~~~~~.fflt:<J.:<;:s,,f~~~~~ L.!!.!NI?, USE ~-E~;,~:~.e~~~~~,~r,oN J ~,,.,,.,_ . .,..,.,,..,..,. . ..,,,.,.--..........._...-.....,._,.,._,>.-c~-'>"....,..~.--'=,....._.,,._. ____ >dl,s,·1 ; PROPERTY OWNER(S) · r NAM: ;:~~o:-~:c::t~:-N:~:::-~--- ADDRESS PO Box 2640 CITY Renton, WA ZIP 98056 f i T~~~BER (425) 271-32~~--_J r APPLICANT (if other than owner) ! :it:,.. ....... ,._,.c.=, •. -.. -~ ... ·-·""'--....--, ............... ..,,,._,, ____ ..,.,_ NAME Peter St Pierre COMPANY (if applicable) Forest Contracting, LLC i i ADDRESS. 27018 -233rd Pl SE CITY Maple Valley, WA ZIP. 98038 f-------------------~ I TELEPHONE NUMBER 206-396-0333 r--"' . ---· -·-co;,:;~-~-PERsoN·--..... --.'. ' ' h-•, • co' ,,,..·~,_,,~ .,.,._.,.,J-,-;.,..,.,.,._~,,.,.,.-.• -.>c><.•Co<O,, ., • ,-,,1, • .,,.,..,.,•.,;._,.,._,,,._.~-,.,i,,""".,. .. .,,.,,,_...:_f I NAME Tom Redding : I COMPANY (if apphcable) Encompass Engineering & Surveying I ADDRESS 165 NE Juniper St, Suite 201 1 CITY Issaquah, WA ZIP 98027 I I TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS. 425-392-0250, tredding@encompasses.net 1 t-.. ~~,,--..-.-.... ... ;...,....;...,..-_,..._..,.,,-,,.,...._, "'"''--"-~, •• ,,, • .,,_,.,. ........... ""'"""' ... ""''-''""""''"''"""-----~ h~~--!~.:!.:E:!~'?~~A,_r,_o_N ___ "'"".~ i PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME I C b II Sh rt Pl t amp e 0 a i PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: SW Corner of the intersection of NE 9th St and Anacortes Ave NE, 98059 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S) 102305-9095 EXISTING LAND USE(S). Vacant PROPOSED LAND USE(S) Single Family Residential I EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION I RS -Residential Single Family _J PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION / (if applicable) N/A EXISTING ZONING R-8 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable) NIA SITE AREA (in square feet): 83.428 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE I DEDICATED 0 ---- SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS 1,807 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET I ACRE (if applicable) 14.08 NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) 2 NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable) 2 r•-: .. I I I I ! i i I I I i I H: \CEO\Data \Forms-Templates \Self-Help Handouts \Plan n ing\Master Application.doc ---------~---~ .. ~. -~"~----- ~--------P ____ R..:..cO=-:J:..::E_C_T~IN.:.c_F---=O'--RMA TION (continued) I NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable) I / PROJECT VALU~ ]Q I I' SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENT!/\~ BUILDINGS (if applicable) N/ A -I i ' IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable)_ i SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL ' BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (tf applicable) N/A D AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE ----···· SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL D AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL D FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq_ ft. BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/ A D GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft_ NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable) N/A D HABITAT CONSERVATION sq ft I NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW D SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES sq ft_ f PROJECT (if applicable) N/A iJ WETLANDS 26,108 ~sqft --------------,-·---~--·------·--·------·---------.. ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ! ; ·-·· i~ttach legal d.!;!!:!!,e,!!~on separat~ sheet with the foll~wing inf~r~ation included) _ _ J, rSITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION~. TOWNSHIP E_, RANGE _s_, IN THE CITY ' t'~~-~~r.~.~NG :?.~.~12'.:.~~~~~NG.:::.~--~--~----·--··-·------~-J ' AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP l '>,~-~-'~•·'-"·'""'I••_.,,.,,:·.~•'• .. ·•~S-•c,;•.; .. ,~., ,• ~ .,, • I (Print Name/s) __ _ , declare under penalty of perJury undr ;;, laws of the State of Washington that I am (please check one)[_] the current owner of the property involved in this application or ' the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in aU respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief Signature of Owner/Repr~entative STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) D te --------------------- Signature of Owner/Representative Date t certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that acknowledge it to be his/her/their fre€ and voluntary act for the s ned this instrument and 1:1 in the instrument. Dated - Not~0 y Public State o: ,\cis'11ngton WINDY E BUCHFN ·'.ly Appgintment Expires $ep 6. 2018 - • V\)l rd~_ E:: Tuchll' Notary (Print) My appointment expires· 2 H :\CED\Data\Forms-Template!:. \Self-Help H;mdouts\Planning\Master Application.doc ReY: 02/2015 ; • ~· l > !' •• March 20, 2015 To Whom It May Concern: Steve Dillingham is the Renton Church of the Nazarene's Secretary of the Board of Directors and is an authorized signer in full representation of the Church for all legal documents. Sincerely illingham Board of Directors Treasurer ) , CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT PROJECT NARRATIVE • Project name, size and location of site: Campbell Short Plat is located at the intersection of NE 9th St. and Anacortes Ave NE, Tax Parcel 102305-9095. The total area of the site is 83,428 sq ft. • Land use permits required for proposed project: Short Plat approval. • Zoning description of the site and adjacent properties: The site is zoned R-8, Single Family Residential. Property to the north and east is single family, west is church, and property south is church/school property. • Current use of the site and any existing improvements: The property is currently vacant. • Special site features (i.e., wetlands, water bodies, steep slopes): There is a wetland on the south westerly portion of the site. A wetland report was prepared by Alder NW December 6 1h 2008 and confirmed by Altmann Oliver Associates January 29'h 2015. • Statement addressing soil type and drainage conditions: According to the 1973 King County Soils Map, the site is Alderwood, Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC). • Proposed use of the property and scope of the proposed development: Proposed two-lot single-family residential development of one existing tax parcel. ; • For plats indicate the proposed number, density, and range of sizes of the new lots: Two lots, with lot sizes of 13,445 sq. ft. (7,318 sq. ft. net) (Lot 1) and 7,912 sq. ft. (Lot 2), and density of 4.08 units per acre. Because the panhandle portion of the northwest corner of Lot 1 has a width of less than 80% of the minimum lot width of 50', it was subtracted from the gross lot area and noted are the "net" area. • Access: Access will be from Anacortes Ave NE to NE 9th St. to a joint use driveway. • Proposed off-site improvements (i.e., installation of sidewalks, fire hydrants, sewer main, etc.): Curb, gutter, sidewalk and landscaping along the property frontage. • Total estimated construction cost and estimated fair market value of the proposed project: Construction cost of about $50,000 and an estimated fair market value of $400,000 ± • Estimated quantities and type of materials involved if any fill or excavation is proposed: Grading will be required to create access to the building pads within the future lots. The grading will consist of excavation of the driveways, excavation of material for the leveling of the building pads and general lot leveling. The material will be removed from the site. The quantities are not known at this time. Grading quantity information will be provided when the engineering plans are provided for review and approval. • Number, type and size of any trees to be removed: Thirty percent of trees in noncritical area will be retained. There will be approximately five (5) 6" to 12" Alder, thirteen (13) 6" to 22" Fir, one (1) 13" Maple, and one (1) Deciduous trees removed with this project. • Explanation of any land to be dedicated to the City: , 2,830 sq ft dedicated for public streets. • Any proposed job shacks, sales trailers, and/or model homes: NIA • Any proposed modifications being requested: NIA • Distance in feet from the wetland or stream to the nearest area of work: 50 Feet / -·,. PRE-APPLICATION MEETING COMMENTS FOR S\ -~; .. ,;_, <, CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT -'< PRE 15-000086 CITY OF RENTON Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division February 26, 2015 Contact Information: Planner: Clark H. Close, 425-430-7289 Public Works Plan Reviewer: Kam ran Yazdidoost, 425-430-7382 Fire Prevention Reviewer: Corey Thomas, 425-430-7024 Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell, 425-430-7290 Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work on the project. You will need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply for land use and/or environmental permits. Pre-screening: When you have the project application ready for submittal, call and schedule an appointment with the project manager to have it pre-screened before making all of the required copies. The pre-application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Development Services Director, Department of Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator and City Council). '" --, ~~ r APR 1 0 ZC'.'J '! • FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM February 26, 2015 Clark Close, Associate Planner Corey Thomas, Plan Review/Inspector (Campbell Short Plat -APN 10230S-9095) PRE15-0000B6 1. The fire flow requirement for a single family home is 1,000 gpm minimum for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet (including garage and basements). If the dwelling exceeds 3,600 square feet, a minimum of 1,500 gpm fire flow would be required. A minimum of one fire hydrant is required within 300-feet of the proposed buildings and two hydrants if the fire flow goes up to 1,500 gpm. Existing hydrants can be counted toward the requirements as long as they meet current code including 5-inch storz fittings. A minimum of one new hydrant shall be required as there are no hydrants within 300-feet of Lot 2. 2. The fire impact fees are currently applicable at the rate of $495.10 per single family unit. 3. Fire department apparatus access roadways are required to be a minimum of 20-feet wide fully paved, with 25-feet inside and 45-feet outside turning radius. Fire access roadways shall be constructed to support a 30-ton vehicle with 75-psi point loading. Access is required within 150-feet of all points on the buildings. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY ANO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ,..;, bl, City o{),. /-. ' .. ·'°" ... ··, .... ---~'.s;illll1@fill 0$~ DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM February 26, 2015 Clark Close, Associate Planner Kamran Yazdidoost, Plan Reviewer Campbell Short Plat 4004 NE 19TH St. PRElS-000086 NOTE: The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary is preliminary and non- binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official city decision-makers. Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning, code changes, and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. I have completed a preliminary review for the above-referenced proposal. The following comments are based on the pre-application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant. Water 1. The proposed development is within the City's water service area and in the Highlands 565- hydraulic zone. The development is outside of the City's aquifer protection areas. 2. There is an existing 8-inch water main (see City water project plan no. W-2107) in NE 9th Street. The 8-inch line can deliver 2,000 gallons per minute (gpm). 3. The static water pressure is about 63 psi at elevation of 416 feet. 4. There is an existing fire hydrant at the southwest corner of NE 9th Street and Bremerton Ave NE which can deliver 1,000 gallons per minute. The hydrant is more than 300 feet away from the new southerly lot. 5. The following water improvements will be required to provide water service for domestic use and for fire protection for the subject development: a. Installation of 1-inch minimum domestic water service line and meter to each lot. b. Installation of an additional fire hydrant within 300 feet of each lot if required by Renton Fire Prevention Department and/or if the proposed single family dwellings will exceed 3,600 sq ft of gross area. c. Subject to payment of applicable water system development charges and water meter installation fees for the new lots. Sanitary Sewer 1. Sewer service is provided by the City of Renton. There is an existing 8-inch sewer main in NE 9th Street. The applicant can connect directly to the 8-inch main sewer at NE 9th Street. 2. The development is subject to a wastewater system development charge (SDC) fee. The SDC fee for sewer is based on the size of the new domestic water to serve the new home on each lot. The sewer fee for a %-inch or 1-inch meter install is $2,135.00. 3. This parcel is subject to a Special Assessment District. The East Renton Interceptor fee is $316.80 per lot. Payment of these fees will be required prior to issuance of the utility construction permit. fr5 Ir ,A,-f3ti£-¥ 0:rf'kp( ~,,,- storm Drainage 1. There is a drainage structure on NE 9th Street. 2. A drainage report complying with the City adopted 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and City Amendments will be required. Based on the City's flow control map, the site lies within the Flow Control Duration Standard (Forested Condition). Refer to Figure 1.1.2.A - Flow chart for determining the type of drainage review required in the City of Renton 2009 Surface Water Design Manual Amendment. Stormwater BMPs applicable to the development must be provided. The drainage report must account for all the improvements provided by the project. Stormwater improvements based on the drainage report study will be required to be provided by the developer. 3. A drainage plan and drainage report will be required with the site plan application. The report shall comply with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual and the 2009 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWDM, Chapter 1 and 2. All core and any special requirements shall be contained in the report. 4. A geotechnical report for the site is required. Information on the water table and soil permeability with recommendations of appropriate flow control BMP options with typical designs for the site from the geotechnical engineer shall be submitted with the application. 5. Surface water system development fee is $1,350.00 for each new lot. This is payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. 6. A Construction Stormwater Permit from Department of Ecology is required if clearing and grading of the project exceeds one acre. Transportation/Street 1. This project fronts NE 9th Street. Street improvements for this project must meet the city of Renton Street standards. 2. Existing right of way width in this section of NE 9th Street is approximately 30 feet. NE 9th Street is classified as a residential access road. To meet the City's complete street standards for residential access road, street improvements including, but not limited to 16--foot of paving from centerline (one travel lane and parking), 0.5-foot curb, gutter, an 8-foot planter strip, a 5-foot sidewalk, and storm drainage improvements are required to be constructed in the right of way fronting the site per City code 4-6-060. This will require half street right of way dedication of approximately 23 feet (subject to final survey) on the project frontage on NE 9th Street. The half street frontage improvements will be required to be built on the NE 9th Street frontage by the developer. 3. The current transportation impact fee is $2,214.44 per new single-family lot. These fees are payable prior to building permit issuance. 4. All utilities serving the site are required to be undergrounded. General Comments 1. All construction utility permits for drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. Separate permit and fees will be required for the water meter installation, side sewer connection and storm water connection. 3. Water services, sewer stubs and drainage flow control BMPs are required to be provided to new lots prior to recording of the short plat. 4. Water, sewer and storm stubs will be provided to each lot prior to recording of the plat. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY ANO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: February 26, 2015 TO: Pre-Application File No. 15-000086 FROM: Clark H. Close, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Campbell Short Plat-APN 102305-9095 General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator, Planning Director, Development Services Director, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or online at www.rentonwa.gov. Project Proposal: The subject properties are located in the Highlands area of Renton at the southwest corner of the intersection of NE g'h St and Anacortes Ave NE (APN 102305-9095). The applicant is proposing to short plat a 1.92-acre parcel of vacant land into 2 single family lots. The lots would range in size from 9,175 sf to 10,797 sf with an average lot size of 9,986 sf. The site has a Comprehensive Land Use of Residential Single Family (RS) and a zoning designation of Residential-8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre (du/ac). The short plat is intended for the eventual development of two (2) new detached single-family homes. The applicant is proposing to access Lot 2 via a 20-foot wide access/utility easement on the east side of Lot 1. •he remaining area will consist of two Tracts for stormwater and Native Growth Protection Area. Current Use: The rectangular shaped parcel is vacant undisturbed land with heavy vegetation. There is a Category 2 wetland covering roughly 50% of the land. Zoning/Density Requirements: The subject property is located within the R-8 zoning classification. The density range allowed in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 4.0 to a maximum of 8.0 dwelling units per 1 net acre. The area of public and private streets and critical areas would be deducted from the gross site area to determine the "net" site area prior to calculating density. Using the gross square footage, the 2-lot proposal arrives at a gross density of approximately 2.8 du/ac (2 lots/ 0.723 acres= 2.8 du/ac). (Tract A-51,935 sf was deducted from the gross density.) It is unclear exactly how much area would be required to be dedicated for right-of-way; therefore, the net density of site could not be calculated. A Density Worksheet would be required at the time of formal short plat application. The applicant would be H :\CED\Planning\Cu rrent P la nn i ng\P R EAPPS\14-001628 Campbell Short Plat, PRE15-000086 Page 2 of 7 February 26, 2015 required to demonstrate compliance with the net density requirements af the zone at the time of formal application. Based on the density of 2.8 du/ac, the subject site does not meet the minimum density requirements of the zone. On September 22, 2014, the City of Renton adopted interim zoning prior to the Comprehensive Plan update process (Ordinance No. 5724). The purpose of the interim zoning ordinance is to continue to permit new development in a manner that improves the compatibility of new development with existing development in the surrounding community and with potential changes in zoning code and to allow the City adequate time to consider and develop new zoning code regulations as well as potential rezones of some areas. Washington State law enables cities to exercise this type of zoning on a limited basis. The development standards for residential development are as follows: ' Interim Zoning R-8 (old standards) (current standards) Minimum Lot Area 4,500 sf for parcels greater than 1 acre. 7,000 sq. ft. 5,000 sf for parcels 1 acre or Jess. Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 60 ft. Minimum Lot Width (corner lots) 60 ft. 70 ft. Minimum Lot Depth 65 ft. 90 ft. Front Setback 15 ft. 25 ft. Rear Setback 20 ft. 25 ft. Side Setback 5 ft. 7.5 ft. 15 ft. combined Side Setback (along a street) 15 ft. with a min, of 5 ft. (per Cl-64) Maximum Height 30 ft. 30 ft. Maximum Building Coverage 50% 40% {including Primary and Accessory) Maximum impervious surface 75% 55% Development Standards: The project would also be subject to RMC 4-2-llOA, "Development Standards for Single Family Zoning Designations" and interim zoning effective at the time of complete application (noted as R-8 standards herein). Single family residential development is permitted outright in the R-8 zone. Minimum Lot Size, Width and Depth -The current minimum lot size permitted in the R-8 zone is 7,000 square feet for all parcels. A minimum lot width of 60 feet for interior lots and 70 feet for corner lots, as well as a minimum lot depth of 90 feet, is also required. The applicant would be required to demonstrate compliance with lot size, width and depth of the zone at the time of formal application. Building Standards -R-8 zone allows a maximum building coverage of 40%. The maximum impervious coverage in the R-8 zone is 55%. Building height is restricted to 30 feet from existing grade. Detached non-residential accessory structures must remain below a height of 15 feet. The gross floor area of accessory structures must be less than that of the primary structure. Accessory structures are also included in building lot coverage calculations. The proposal's H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PREAPPS\15-000086 Campbell Short Plat, PRElS-000086 Page 3 of 7 February 26, 2015 compliance with the building standards would be verified at the time of building permit review for the new residences. Setbacks -Setbacks are the minimum required distance between the building footprint and the property line and any private access easement. The current required setbacks in the R-8 zone are 25 feet in front for the primary structure, 25 feet in the rear, 15 feet combined with a minimum of 5 feet for interior side yards, and 17.5 feet on side yards along streets. Setbacks would be vested at time of complete Short Plot application submittal. The setbacks for the new residences would be reviewed at the time of building permit. Residential Design and Open Space Standards: All new dwelling units in the Residential Eight Dwelling Units per Acre (R-8) zone are subject to the Residential Design and Open Space Standards outlined in RMC 4-2-115. The proposal's compliance with the residential design standards would be verified at the time of building permit review for the new residences ta be located on all new lots. Lot Configuration One of the following is required: 1. Lot width variation of 10 feet (10') minimum of one per four (4) abutting street-fronting lots, or 2. Minimum of four (4) lot sizes (minimum of400 gross square feet size difference), o;'i'. \ "- 3. A front yard setback variation of at least five feet (5') minimum for at least every foui (4}._ abutting street fronting lots. ~ Based on the submitted application Jot configuration standard #2 above has been met. "'"· Garages -The visual impact of garages shall be minimized, while porches and front doors shall be the emphasis of the front of the home. Garages shall be located in a manner that minimizes the presence of the garages and shall not be located at the end of view corridors. Alleyway access is encouraged. If used, shared garages shall be within an acceptable walking distance to the housing unit it is intended to serve. Primary Entry Entrances to homes shall be a focal point and allow space for social interaction. Front doors shall face the street and be on the fa,ade ciosest to the street. When a home is located on a corner lot (i.e., at the intersection of two roads or the intersection of a road and a common space), a feature like a wraparound porch shall be used to reduce the perceived scale of the house and engage the street or open space on both sides. Fa~ade Modulation -Buildings shall not have monotonous fa,ades along public areas. Dwellings shall include articulation along public frontages; the articulation may include the connection of an open porch to the building, a dormer facing the street, or a well-defined entry element. Windows and Doors -Windows and front doors shall serve as an integral part of the character of the home. Primary windows shall be proportioned vertically rather than horizontally. Vertical windows may be combined together to create a larger window area. Front doors shall be a focal point of the dwelling and be in scale with the home. All doors shall be of the same character as the home. Scale. Bulk. and Character -A diverse streetscape shall be provided by using elevations and models that demonstrate a variety of floor plans, home sizes, and character. Neighborhoods shall have a variety of home sizes and character. H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PREAPPS\15-000086 '•" Campbell Short Plat, PRE15-000u85 Page4of7 February 26, 2015 Roofs -Roofs shall represent a variety of forms and profiles that add character and relief to the landscape of the neighborhood. The use of bright colors, as well as roofing that is made of material like gravel and/or reflective material, is discouraged. Eaves -Eaves should be detailed and proportioned to complement the architectural style of the home. Architectural Detailing -Architectural detail shall be provided that is appropriate to the architectural character of the home. Detailing like trim, columns, and/or corner boards shall reflect the architectural character of the house. Materials and Color -A diversity of materials and color shall be used on homes throughout the community. A variety of materials that are appropriate to the architectural character of the neighborhood shall be used. A diverse palette of colors shall be used to reduce monotony of color or tone. Access/Parking: Vehicular access to the proposed new lots is proposed from NE 9th Street. Access to Lot 2 is proposing via a 20-foot wide access easement across the eastern edge of Lot 1. Residential access improvements include a 53-foot right-of-way width in order to meet the City's complete street standards requirements. Shared driveways are required to be wholly within a tract; the width of the tract and paved surface shall be a minimum of sixteen feet (16'); the Fire Department may require the tract and paved surface to be up to twenty feet (20') wide. No sidewalks are required for shared driveways. An access easement shall be recoded with the King County Recorder's Office and be shown on the face of the plat to encumber the entirety of the tract (RMC 4-6-060J). Please note that the proposal for access easements would be required to be revised to tracts prior to submitting for Short Plat application. Two off-street parking spaces are required for each primary residence. The maximum width of single loaded garage driveways shall not exceed nine feet (9') and double loaded garage driveways shall not exceed sixteen feet (16'). Driveways: Site topography slopes from east to west. The total elevation change is estimated from 416 feet to 404 feet. The southwest corner of the property is generally flat at about elevation 404 to elevation 406. Driveways exceeding 8% must provide slotted drains at the lower end of the driveway. The maximum grade for the shared driveway shall not exceed fifteen percent (15%). Landscaping and Open Space: Vegetation consists primarily of mixed conifer-deciduous forest stand, red alder, big leaf maple, Douglas fir, salmonberry, Himalayan blackberry, and sword fern. Except for critical areas, all portions of a development area not covered by structures, required parking, access, circulation or service areas, must be landscaped with native, drought-resistant, vegetative cover. Ten feet (10') of onsite landscaping is required along all public street frontages, with the exception of areas for required walkways and driveways according to the landscaping standards of RMC 4-4-070F. Such landscaping shall include a mixture of trees, shrubs, and groundcover as approved by the Department of Community and Economic Development. Minimum planting strip widths between the curb and sidewalk are established according to the street development standards of RMC 4-6-060. Street trees and, at a minimum, groundcover are to be located in this area when present. Street tree spacing standards shall be as stipulated by the Department of Community and Economic Development, provided there shall be a minimum of one street tree planted per address. Any additional undeveloped right-of-way areas shall be H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PREAPPS\15-000086 Campbell Short Plat, PRElS-000086 Page5of7 February 26, 2015 landscaped unless otherwise determined by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee. Broad leaf trees planted in residential zones must be a minimum of one and one-half inches (1.5") in diameter (dbh). Conifer trees at the time of planting must be fully branched and a minimum of six feet (6') in height. A conceptual landscape plan must be provided with the formal land use application as prepared by a registered Landscape Architect, a certified nurseryman or other certified professional. The plan shall include, but is not limited to, the minimum 10-foot on-site landscaping strip and street trees within the planting strip of each lot. Significant Tree Retention: If significant trees (greater than 6-inch caliper) are proposed to be removed, a tree inventory and a tree retention plan along with a tree retention worksheet shall be provided with the formal land use application. The tree retention plan must show preservation of at least 30% of significant trees, and indicate how proposed building footprints would be sited to accommodate preservation of significant trees that would be retained. The Administrator may authorize the planting of replacement trees on the site if it can be demonstrated to the Administrator's satisfaction that an insufficient number of trees can be retained. In addition to retaining 30% of existing significant trees, each new lot would be required to provide a minimum tree density of 2 trees per 5,000 square feet (or the gross equivalent of caliper inches provided by one or more trees) of lot area onsite. Protected trees that do not contribute to a lot's required minimum tree density shall be held in perpetuity within a tree protection tract. Significant trees shall be retained in the following priority order: Priority One: Landmark trees; significant trees that form a continuous canopy; significant trees on slopes greater than 20%; significant trees adjacent to critical areas and their associated buffers; and significant trees over 60' in height or greater than 18" caliper. Priority Two: Healthy tree groupings whose associated undergrowth can be preserved; other significant native evergreen or deciduous trees; and other significant non-native trees. Priority Three: Alders and cottonwoods shall be retained when all other trees have been evaluated for retention and are not able to be retained, unless the alders and/ or cottonwoods are used as part of an approved enhancement project within a critical area or its buffer. The Administrator may require independent review of any land use application that involves tree removal and land clearing at the City's discretion. See recently adopted Ordinance 5748 for details. A formal tree retention plan would be reviewed at the time of Short Plat application. Fences/Walls: If the applicant intends to install any fences or retaining walls as part of this project, the location must be designated on the landscape plan or grading plan. A fence and/or wall detail should also be included on the plan as well. A fence taller than six feet (6') shall require a building permit or an explicit exemption from the Building Official. A retaining wall that is four feet (4') or taller, as measured by the vertical distance from the bottom of the footing to the finish grade at the top of the wall requires a building permit. A fence shall not be constructed on top of a retaining wall unless the total combin'ed height of the retaining wall and the fence does not exceed the allowed height of a standalone fence. For more information about fences and retaining walls see RMC 4-4-040. H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PREAPPS\15-000086 Campbell Short Plat, PRElS-000086 Page 6 of 7 February 26, 2015 Critical Areas: There appears to be a Category 2 wetland throughout the central southwestern portion of the site, high seismic fault area along the central and southern property line, and a moderate landslide hazard located along the west edge of the property. The applicant has submitted a wetland reconnaissance study prepared by Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC (dated January 29, 2015). The primary purpose of the reconnaissance was to confirm that the wetland boundary and classification as delineated by AderNW in an August 26, 2008 report. The 2015 report, states that "based on the recent review, the surveyed wetland boundary appears to remain accurate and a re-delineation does not appear warranted." A wetland report delineating and classifying the wetland onsite is required to be submitted with the formal land use application. In addition, as there are proposed impacts to the wetland a mitigation plan should also be submitted. City staff may require secondary review of the wetland report, at the expense of the applicant. Seismic hazards and moderate landslide hazards are both Geological Hazards; therefore, a geotechnical study may be required to be provided by a qualified professional. The study shall demonstrate that the proposal will not increase the threat of the geological hazard to adjacent properties beyond the pre-development conditions, the proposal will not adversely impact other critical areas, and the development can be safely accommodated on the site. In addition, the study shall assess soil conditions and detail construction measures to assure building stability_ !tis the applicant's responsibility to ascertain whether additional critical areas are present on the site through a critical areas study. Environmental Review: Except when located in sensitive areas (such as wetland) or lands covered by water, short plats of four or fewer lots are categorically exempt from Environmental (SEPA) Review. The applicant would be required to complete Environmental (SEPA) Review due to the presence of wetlands identified on the site. An environmental determination will be made by the Renton Environmental Review Committee. This determination is subject to appeal by either the project proponent, by a citizen of the community, or another entity having standing for an appeal. Note: The fee for Environmental (SEPA) Review is $1,030.00 ($1,000.00 plus 3 % Technology Surcharge Fee). Please note that code changes to critical area buffers and structure setbacks from buffers are being reviewed by the Planning Commission. Visit the Planning Commission Information webpage and see Draft Critical Areas Regulations under the February 4, 2015 meeting at http://www.rentonwa.gov/business/default.aspx?id=2778 for more information_ Permit Requirements: The proposal would require approval of an administrative short plat and Environmental (SEPA) Review. The administrative short plat request would be reviewed within an estimated time frame of six to eight weeks. The Short Plat application fee is $2,000.00 ($2,000.00 plus 3% Technology Surcharge Fee). Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal is provided in the attached handouts. The applicant will be required to install a public information sign on the property. Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal requirements is provided in the attached handouts. Once Preliminary Short Plat approval is obtained, the applicant must complete the required improvements and dedications, as well as satisfy any conditions of the preliminary approval before submitting for Final Short Plat review. Once final approval is H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PREAPPS\15-000086 Campbell Short Plat, PRElS-000086 Page 7 of 7 February 26, 2015 received, the plat may be recorded. The newly created lots may only be sold after the plat has been recorded. Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction fees, the following impact fees would be required prior to the building permit issuance (these fees may change from year-to- year): • A Transportation Impact Fee based on $2,214.44 per each new single family residence; • A Parks Impact Fee based on $1,441.29 per each new single family residence; • A Fire Impact fee of $495.10 per each new single family residence; and • A Renton School District Impact Fee based on $5,541 per each~ single family residence. A handout listing Renton's development-related fees is available on the City of Renton website for your review. Note: When the formal application materials are complete, the applicant is strongly encouraged to have one copy of the application materials pre-screened at the 6th floor front counter prior to submitting the complete application package. Please call Clark H. Close, Associate Planner at 425-430-7289 for an appointment. Expiration: Upon approval, the short plat is valid for two years with a possible one-year extension. H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PREAPPS\15-000086 IJ ) 2 s ' " '" ' irl ;\ 1) r. " )" = I"· , ~ -, i J ill Ji It~ : ; : I 11 11 1 , , I . ,,1 1 1' c__d t \; :.-...,,.;;;;;J-,'!" ·:r,\d: 1' ~ J1) :_:);}' .... ..,,1· ' ·' a1: I 01 "' '""''" /;,~ PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 10, TWN.2'.lN .. RNG 5 E, WM CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON '~ ifrtr T~ACT A !l;'<1!V!; G!H)Wlft ;if!OTF.CH<JN ty,;;F.M,;~1 ·, J. I ' [~l I~ I , • ; ! 1 ! "" I ,, • t) ,.,. ~"'"-" • r: 1 .1 ·"'-' · · '. :;.'·"'" ~·~~;;';'.~ ~~:t I ,I,_ Y/ , ' --.'.=:"::-,_ , • • =-• ,,, •.:~;•;. =•··-·., "'" ""'"'. ~,,~, ~ ~;,;,~.·~~~ , . .,_ t "''"" :: ;.;;;., ''oi> ,~::t ---..'";~,,.~~'\" H~ '>" ·; ~.-, .. ; 1 · -1'l"' '\".i . t·~----·"'-''r)fi!.l., .. .. , t ~ .. ' 2 L _____ ---·--,-- .;·.-;,:-··-· ;-... -, . ,:,._t1 i!;r~ -li!J -•.--·-r../~- -~ :.i_>; " -----·--·-----···-------.. ------·· ---·- ·---·---·---·-------.----------- ,ro.o.i :,rnc~·,.;1()1. ·,:(l\_t1<;& .. lll;PJ.'e!, ~~ ""' "'" ';! ... ~,, .. ,,_., ___ .,,.., "'' ,.,. 1J.tttlli:!i...i:i:W;RQ_,,M<;;l,\/~.:S. -<~;·r.J-~,, /1· "'<,.\ (,; )1 ,,, \,~ ..... _ .. .,, ... / ~ ~"~" ,.i,.,i-, Oi;,low Call h/!arf y()I., :h~ ' DEPARTMENT OF COMMUN, 1, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ~~----- , .. ,(~0'.>>:-., {;>• ... +) '~t01 WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: WAIVED MODIFIED BY: BY: Arborist Report • Biological Assessment 4 ~ Calculations 1 Colored Maps for Display 4 CA,4v- Construction Mitigation Description 2 ANO• Deed of Right-of-Way Dedication 1 Density Worksheet 4 Drainage Control Plan 2 Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Architectural aAN04 Environmental Checklist 4 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy) lANo• Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) , ANO• : Flood Hazard Data• CMt,, Floor Plans, ANO• Geotechnical Report, ANO, Grading Elevations & Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Elevations & Plan, Detailed 2 Habitat Data Report 4 c~ Improvement Deferral 2 Irrigation Plan 4 COMMENTS: PROJECT NAME: CttrnP8flJ-~ p~ DATE: ----'f_,_/3_,_j....:IS-____ _ APR 10 ?CS 1 H :\CED\Data \Forms· T emplates\Self-Help H andouts\Plan ning\ Wa iversubm ittalreqs.docx Rev: 02/2015 • • LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITIAL REQUIREMENTS: WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: BY: BY: King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 Landscape Plan, Conceptual, Landscape Plan, Detailed, Legal Description 4 Letter of Understanding of Geological Risk 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions, Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one per monument) 1 Neighborhood Detail Map, Overall Plat Plan 4 Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 Post Office Approval 2 Plat Name Reservation 4 Plat Plan 4 Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 Public Works Approval Letter, Rehabilitation Plan 4 Screening Detail 4 Shoreline Tracking Worksheet 4 Site Plan 2 AND, Stream or Lake Study, Standard 4 0,/-(.. ' Stream or Lake Study, Supplemental 4 O!tc., Stream or Lake Mitigation Plan, vttz:.., Street Profiles 2 r~-»s;i.--- ~TIU. /l.{i;6{. SPOT £/.IN"' rLOww,vt,. II. Cet'/1"1,J!.u ,n;: of\l P 1.-PrN VI i. IV Title Report or Plat Certificate 1AN0, Topography Map, Traffic Study 2 Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4 Urban Design Regulations Analysis, Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final 4 Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4 2 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Waiversubmittalreqs.docx Rev:02/2015 ' LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: i Wetlands Report/Delineation 4 Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2AND3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND, Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND, Map of Existing Site Conditions 2AND3 Map of View Area 2AND3 Photosimulations 2AND3 This Requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services 2 Development Engineering Plan Review 3 Building 4 Planning WAIVED MODIFIED BY: BY: 3 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Waiversubmittalreqs.docx COMMENTS: Rev:02/2015 CAMPBELL SHORT PLAT CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION Proposed construction start date will be approximately in Summer/Fall 2015 and completion will be in approximately two months. Hours of operation will be within the permitted time of7:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. Monday through Friday. Proposed hauling/transportation route will be north on Anacortes Ave NE, west on NE 1 O'h St. to Union Ave NE. Hauling will be within the restricted hours of 8:30 A.M. and 3:30 P.M Monday through Friday. Water trucks, street sweepers and any other requirements deemed necessary would be implemented for any impacts that may occur. There will be no anticipated weekend, late night or any other specialty hours proposed for construction or hauling at this time. Flag persons will be employed and signs will be installed for traffic control when necessary. C' A f'P 1 0 ?!,!'· f'\ \ -, -I., Print Form Reset Form DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT r Citv of --------1 "_~I JI CJ I J DENSITY WORKSHEET Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 1. Gross area of property 83,428 ------- 2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. 3. 4. 5. 6. These include: Public Streets* Private access easements* Critical Areas** Total excluded area: 2,830 1,807 57,434 Subtract line 2 (total excluded area) from line 1 for net area Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage Number of dwelling units or lots planned Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density *Alleys (public or private} do not have to be excluded. square feet square feet square feet 62,071 21,357 0.4903 2 4.0792 square feet square feet square feet acres units/lots = dwelling units/acre **Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands, or floodwoys." Critical Areas buffers are not deducted/ excluded. 1 Y;\Jobs (JJ\15\15517 Pacific Peak Construction\DOCS\Preliminary SP\Density Worksheet.pdf Rev: 02/2015 City of Renton TREE RETENTION WORKSHEET 1. Total number of trees over 6" in diameter1 on project site: 1. __ 17_2 ____ trees 2. Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation: Trees that are dead, diseased or dangerous2 NIA trees Trees in proposed public streets trees Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts 1 trees Trees in critical areas3 and buffers -,-42 ___ trees Total number of excluded trees: 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1: 2. 3. __ 1_4_3 ____ trees 29 trees ------- 4. Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained4, multiply line 3 by: 0.3 in zones RC, R-1, R-4, or R-8 0.1 in all other residential zones 0.05 in all commercial and industrial zones 4. ___ 9 ____ trees 5. List the number of 6" or larger trees that you are proposing5 to retain 4: 5. 11 trees 6. Subtract fine Strom line 4 for trees to be replaced: (If line 6 is less than zero, stop here. No replacement trees are required). 6. __ N_IA ____ trees 7. Multiply line 6 by 12" for number of required replacement inches: 7. N/A inches ------- 8. Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement: (Minimum 2"calipertrees required) 8. -~N~l~A~---inches 9. Divide fine 7 by fine B for number of replacement trees 6: per tree (if remainder is .5 or greater, round up to the next whole number) 9. 1 · Measured at chest height. ___ NI_A ___ trees 2· Dead, diseased or dangerous trees must be certified as such by a forester, registered landscape architect, or certified arborist, and approved by the City. 3-Critical Areas, such as wetlands, streams, floodplains and protected slopes, are defined in Section 4-3-050 of the Renton Municipal Code (RMC). 4 -Count only those trees to be retained outside of critical areas and buffers. s. The City may require modification of the tree retention plan to ensure retention of the maximum number of trees per RMC 4-4-130H7a 5 · Inches of street trees, inches of trees added to critical areas/buffers, and inches of trees retah"ied on site that are less than 6" but are greater than 2" can be used to meet the tree replacement requirement. Y:Vobs (J)\15\15517 Pacrfic Peak Constructron\DOCS\Preliminary SP\TreeRetentionWorksheet.doc /'' M1 Q 1 ,, 01 ,-, ' l' ' ' .i. ~j '·· u I .'.:i 12/08 Real Forest Contracting (206) 255-9893 arboristsNW, LLc w 1v w. a rho r is ts n 1v. c CJ rn P.O. Box 909 Mercer Island, WA 98040 (206) 779-2579 I have personally inspected the trees located at the Campbell subdivision south of the corner of NE 9 and &Anacortes, Renton WA, King count parcel number 1023059095 as you requested. A International Society of Arboriculture level 1 limited visual method was used. The map supplied with the proposed new homes general locations was used to aid in determining any possible impact on the trees. A count was made of the trees 6" DBH "Diameter at Breast Height" and larger in the area outside of the wetland designated piece of the parcel. The total was 135, with Red Alder representing the majority in the 60% range with wild Cherry next, Cottonwood, Douglas fir, Hazelnut, Pacific willow and a row of Bamboo (this species growing on the North side of the parcel having grown from under the neighboring property). Black berry vines dominate the understory to a depth of 30' along the street frontage into the parcel. Several of the trees are stump sprouted from some earlier cutting bordering the neighboring property on that north side. Of the spec!es on site all but the Douglas fir could be termed young trees with the firs being in the 30-40 year old range the remainder in the 10-15 year old range. Overcrowding would be my opinion on the whole site with again the Douglas fir being above the competition for light. The overcrowding aside the trees on site appear to be in good health. The largest stand of Douglas fir is in the far south east corner of the parcel. To address any possible conflict between the trees and the proposed homes there are Douglas firs that look to need their root systems protected. If I have the location of the homes correct 2 Douglas firs north of the building site closest to the street and one larger fir along the fence line east of the second home, the back building site will be affected. It is this second fir that appears to be the closest to the new home. There are smaller trees also to be affected but as they are the Red Alder and they so numerous I have not addressed them here. Neal Baker ArboristsNW.com ISA Cert PN1075A ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified PNW ISA CTRA #867 Member AREA & SOCA DEPARTMENT OF COMIV ITV AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: ~ This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period oftime or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining ifthere may be significant adverse impact. INSTRUCTIONS FOR LEAD AGENCIES: Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects ofthe proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. c 1 C Y:\Jobs (J)\15\15517 Pacific Peak Construction\DOCS\SEPA\15517 Campbell SEPA Checklist.doc "Rev: 02/2015 "1 USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: fhelpl For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B even though questions may be answered "does not apply". In addition the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON PROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should be read as "proposal", "proponent", and "affected geographic area" respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B -Environmental Elements -that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis ofthe proposal. For help go to: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/sepa/e-review.html A. BACKGROUND~ 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: ~ Campbell Short Plat 2. Name of applicant: ~ Forest Contracting, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:~ Applicant: Peter St. Pierre Forest Contracting, Inc. 27018 -233rd Pl SE Maple Valley, WA 98038 206-396-0333 4. Date checklist prepared:~ April 2, 201S 5. Agency requesting checklist: ~ City of Renton Contact: Chad Allen 2 Encompass Engineering & Surveying 16S NE Juniper St., Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 42S-392-0250 Y:\Jobs (J)\15\15517 Pacific Peak Construction\DOCS\SEPA\1SS17 Campbell SEPA Checklist.doc Rev: 02/2015 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): [h§jQ] Summer/Fall 2015 construction 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. [h§jQ] SFR construction on lots. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. [h§jQ] A Wetland Delineation and Report has been prepared by Alder Northwest and confirmed by Altmann Oliver & Associates . 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. [h§jQ] None known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. [h§jQ] Administrative Short Plat Review, and other City of Renton permits required to connect to the existing utilities, improve frontage/etc. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) [h§jQ] This is a proposal to develop an 83,428 sq.ft. parcel into two single-family lots with associated frontage road widening and utilities. 3 Y:Vobs (J)\15\15517 Pacific Peak Construction\DOCS\SEPA\15517 Campbell SEPA Checklist.doc Rev:02/2015 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries ofthe site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. [bfilQl The site is located at NE 9th and Anacortes Ave. NE, Tax Parcel 102305-9095, situate in the NW quarter of Section 10, Township 23, Range 5, in the City of Renton, King County, WA. 8. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS [bfilQl 1. EARTH a. General description of the site [bfilQl (check or circle one): Flat, Rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other~~~~~~ b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? [bfilQl 15% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. [bfilQl The site is mapped by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service as underlain with Alderwood sandy loam/till soil. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. [heip] None known. 4 Y:\Jobs (J)\15\15Sl7 Pacific Peak Construction\D0CS\SEPA\1S5l7 Campbell SEPA Checklist.doc Rev: 02/2015 e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. (helpl Grading will be required to create access to the building pads within the future lots. The grading will consist of excavation of the driveways, excavation of material for the leveling of the building pads, and general lot leveling. It is anticipated that approximately 100 CV of cut and fill will be needed. Of this fill, a portion will be brought in from unknown sources. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. ~ There is some possibility of erosion during the construction of a project, but erosion control measures will be used to minimize the possibility. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?~ When the project is completed, there will be approximately 20% impervious area within the site. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: ~ Erosion will be controlled during construction with silt fencing, rocked construction entrances and sediment traps. The disturbed soil will be covered with straw and/or planted grass. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. ~ Construction equipment exhaust during construction, little long term emissions after that will be minimal with the single-family use. 5 Y:\Jobs (J)\15\15517 Pacific Peak Construction\DOCS\SEPA\15517 Campbell SEPA Checklist.doc Rev: 02/2015 b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. [heipl No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:~ None. 3. WATER a. Surface Water:~ 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. [llitlgJ Yes, 26,107 sq ft wetland on site. The wetland is a category 2 which requires a 50 ft buffer. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. [llitlgJ Yes. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. ~ None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. ~ None. 6 Y:\Jobs (J)\15\15517 Pacific Peak Construction\DOCS\SEPA\15517 Campbell SEPA Checklist.doc Rev:02/2015 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.~ No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.~ No. b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. I!JgJQJ No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals.; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. l.!J.@JQ] Homes will be served by sewer system. No other waste material or discharge anticipated. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. [help] 7 Y:\Jobs (J)\15\15517 Pacific Peak Construction\DOCS\SEPA\15517 Campbell SEPA Checklist.doc Rev: 02/2015 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. "1eipl The site will drain to the onsite wetland. Runoff from the new impervious surfaces will generally be dispersed into the wooded wetland buffer. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: Runoff from the new impervious surfaces will generally be dispersed into the wooded wetland buffer, thus minimizing any impacts to the downstream drainage system. 4. PLANTS~ a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: ~ _x_deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _x_evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _x_shrubs _x_grass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. _x_wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?~ There will be about 30% tree retention on the lots. All trees in the wetland and buffer will be retained. 8 Y:\Jobs (J)\15\15517 Pacific Peak Construction\DOCS\SEPA\15517 Campbell SEPA Checklist.doc Rev:02/2015 c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. fhelpl None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any:~ When the construction of the residences are complete, individual lot landscaping is generally provided to enhance the aesthetics of the site. At least 30% of the existing trees on the lots will be retained. The landscaping of the lots will more than likely consist of lawn areas, low growing shrubs and ornamental trees. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. None known. 5. ANIMALS a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include:~ Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:------------ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:------------- Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other---------- b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. [hQ!_p] None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.~ None known. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:Jbfilpj None proposed. 9 Y:\.lobs (J)\15\15517 Pacific Peak Construction\DOC5\SEPA\1S517 Campbell SEPA Checklist.doc Rev:02/2015 e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. None known. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. ~ The energy needs of the project will be met using either electric or natural gas or a combination of both. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. ~ No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: ~ Housing construction will conform to state energy codes. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. f.l:lg!2l None known. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. N/A 10 Y:\Jobs (J)\15\15517 Pacific Peak Construction\DOCS\SEPA\15517 Campbell SEPA Checklist.doc Rev: 02/2015 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. N/A 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. None known. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? illfill21 None known. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. illfill21 In the short term, there will be noise associated with the installation of the utilities and construction of the residences. 11 Y:Vobs {J)\15\15517 Pacific Peak Construction\DOCS\SEPA\15517 Campbell SEPA Checklist.doc Rev: 02/2015 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: [heipl The construction noise will be limited to the hours allowed by the City of Renton noise ordinances. Construction hours will be indicated on the approved building permits. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe.~ Site is vacant. Church to the west. Single family to the north and east. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or non-forest use?~ No. 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: N/A c. Describe any structures on the site.~ None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? jhelp: N/A 12 Y,\Jobs (J)\15\15517 Pacific Peak Construction\DOCS\SEPA\15517 Campbell SEPA Checklist.doc Rev:02/2015 e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? fhe!p l R-8 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? ~ Residential SF g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?~ N/A h. Has any part ofthe site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify.~ Yes i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?~ Based upon a model of approximately 2.3 people per residence, approximately 5 people will reside in the completed project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?~ None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: [heio I N/A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: ~ The lots to be created and the residences to be constructed will meet applicable city and state zoning/building codes. Single family residences will be constructed in a single family residential neighborhood. m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: 13 Y:\Jobs (J)\1S\1S517 Pacific Peak Construction\DOCS\SEPA\15517 Campbell SEPA Checklist.doc Rev:02/2015 N/A 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. ~ Two single-family residences will be provided. The units will be middle/high income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. ~ N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: [bg)Q} N/A 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?~ The houses will meet zoning and building codes, and will fit in with the neighborhood. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?~ No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:~ None proposed. 14 Y:\Jobs (J)\15\15517 Pacific Peak Construction\DOCS\SEPA\15517 Campbell SEPA Checklist.doc Rev: 02/2015 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? U:@!QJ N/A b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? U:@!QJ It is not likely that light from the finished project would be a safety hazard or interfere with any views. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? U:@!QJ None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: U:@!QJ None. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? U:@!QJ Not known. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. U:@!QJ No 15 Y:\Jobs {J)\15\15517 Pacific Peak Construction\DOCS\SEPA\15517 Campbell SEPA Checklist.doc Rev:02/2015 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: fhelpJ None proposed. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe. [bmQ] Not known. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Is there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. [bmQ] None c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. [bmQ] N/A d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. N/A 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. [bmQ) Access for lots will be from a newly-constructed joint use driveway, accessing off of NE 9'", extending to the south lot. 16 Y:\Jobs (J)\!S\15517 Pacific Peak Construction\DOCS\SEPA\15517 Campbell SEPA Checklist.doc Rev:02/2015 b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? [help] NE gth St. and Bremerton Ave NE (.28 miles). c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate?~ The completed project will have two off street parking stalls in front of the garage and the potential of 2 parking stalls within the garage of each of the proposed residences. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). ~ A joint use driveway (private) will access NE 9th St./Anacortes Ave NE. Curb, gutter and sidewalk will be added to NE 9th to connect to the existing curb, gutter and sidewalk on Anacortes and NE 9th. e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. ~ No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and non-passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates?~ Based upon a standard model of 9.57 Average Daily Trips (ADT) per residence, it is anticipated that the completed project will generate approximately 20 vehicular trips per day. g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: ~ The City will require a traffic mitigation fee for the development. 17 Y:\Jobs (J)\15\15517 Pacific Peak Construction\DOCS\SEPA\15517 Campbell SEPA Checklist.doc Rev: 02/2015 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.~ There will be a minor increase in need to all of the services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.~ Mitigation fees as required by the City will be paid either at the time of recording the Short Plat or at the time of building permit issuance. 16. UTILITIES a. Check or circle utilities currently available at the site:~ electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other ______________ _ b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.~ City of Renton will be providing water and sanitary service. Puget Sound Energy will be providing the power and gas. 18 Y:\Jobs (J)\15\15517 Pacific Peak Construction\DOCS\SEPA\15517 Campbell SEPA Checklist.doc Rev:02/2015 C. SIGNATURE~ The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Propoaea, s;gn,ru~ ~ (),pp{rf( Name of Signee (printed): _T~o=m~R~e=d=d=in=g._ _____________ _ Position and Agency /Organization: -=E"-'n"'c""o'"'m'-"p"'a"'s"-s -=E,_,.ng°'i"'n"'e"'e.,_,ri"'n,,g_,&=Su"'rv'"'""e""y""in=g._ __ _ DateSubmitted: __ 1+-+1\Sb'-+-} ~' ~--- 19 Y:\Jobs (J)\15\15517 Pacific Peak Construction\DOCS\SEPA\15517 Campbell SEPA Checklist.doc Rev:02/2015 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON PROJECT ACTIONS~ (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and i programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent of the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 20 Y:\Jobs (J)\15\15517 Pacific Peak Construction\DOCS\SEPA\lSS! 7 Campbell SEPA Checklist.doc Rev:02/2015 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. 21 Y:Vobs (J)\15\15517 Pacific Peak Construction\DOCS\SEPA\15517 Campbell SEPA Checklist.doc Rev:02/2015 PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT for Campbell Short Plat April 7, 2015 Encompass Engineering Job No. 15517 Prepared For Pacific Peak Construction 4004 NE 19th Street Renton, WA 98056 Western Washington Division Eastern Washington Division 165 NE Juniper St., Ste 20 I, Issaquah, WA 98027 407 Swiftwater Blvd, Cle Elum, WA 98922 Phone: (425) 392-0250 Fax: (425) 391-3055 Phone: (509) 674-7433 Fax: (509) 674-7419 www. Encompass ES. net SECTION I: SECTION II: SECTION III: SECTION IV: SECTIONV: SECTION VI: SECTION VII: SECTION VIII: SECTION IX: SECTION X: TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT OVERVIEW CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY-NIA OFF-SITE ANALYSIS FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN-NI A SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES OTHER PERMITS-NA ESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT-NI A OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL-NIA SECTION 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW Site Address: King County Tax Parcel: Project Overview xxx Anacortes Avenue N .E., Renton WA, 98059 I 02305-9095 This project involves the development of a vacant 1.92 acre parcel into two single-family lots in zoning R-8. The parcel is vacant and it is mostly covered with heavy vegetation with significant trees. The site generally slopes down to southwest at approximately I 0%±. Per the SCS Soil maps, the site is underlain with Alderwood, gravelly sandy loam (AgC). This is confirmed in the attached Geotechnical Evaluation prepared by Geospectrum Consultants Inc. The southwest of the parcel is covered with wetland category II. -See attached reports. Downstream Drainage Majority of the existing runoff sheet flows southwest towards the on-site existing wetland. Analysis has been done and is included in Section 3 of this report. There have been no problems identified within the downstream drainage system. WLRD Drainage Complaints There are no relevant complaints in the direct vicinity of the project. Refer to the Level I Drainage Analysis included in Section 3 of this report. 2009 KC SWDM Core Requirements Section 1.2.1 Core Requirement #1: Discharge at the natural location • The pervious portions of the developed site will continue to sheet flow southwest towards the natural discharge area-the on-site wetland. The new impervious surfaces will drain to basic dispersion BMPs towards the natural discharge area-the onsite wetland Section 1.2.2 Core Requirement #1: Ojfsite Analysis • An offsite drainage analysis is provided in this Preliminary TIR. Section 1.2.3 Core Requirement #3: Flow Control • The development of this project will result in less than 0. I CFS increase of the 100- year runoff, therefore, detention is not required. A combination of full and basic dispersion will be used, discharging towards the onsite wetland. Section 1.2.4 Core Requirement #4: Conveyance System • The conveyance calculations will be provided with the final engineering plans as needed. Section 1.2.5 Core Requirement #5: Erosion and Sediment Control • A temporary erosion control plan will provide BMPs to be implemented during construction. Section 1.2.6 Core Requirement #6: Maintenance and Operations • A maintenance and operations manual will be provided in the final TIR Section 1.2.7 Core Requirement #7: Financial Guarantees and Liability • The developer will arrange for any financial guarantees and liabilities required Section 1.2.8 Core Requirement #8: Water Quality • There will be less than 5,000 sq-ft of new PGIS so water quality measures are not needed. 2009 KC SWDM Special Requirements Section 1.3. l Special Requirement #1: Other Adopted Area-Specific Requirements • NIA Section 1.3.2 Special Requirement #1: Floodplain/Floodway Delineation • NIA there are no FEMA floodplainslfloodways in the area Section 1.3.3 Special Requirement #3: Flood Protection Facilities • NIA Section 1.3.4 Special Requirement #4: Source Control • Source control is not required for this project. Section 1.3.5 Special Requirement #5: Oil Control • NI A Oil control is not required for this project. ,.,,1',·, de, ' 18 '" . . •' ' ' ir-26· t ,, i °bJ' '" f!.!,' ,1·· i; '' M' NOTCH-BOARD FULL OOFEJGON 'lltENOi BMP rnq LOT I & TRACT B TRACJ/A NA Tl:;( GROWTH ...... ~OTECTION1 _,,.--·,,. EASEMENT ' ,,, N·; CB fiM!':~~ IE•40l.Si: /, j \',' , n•1A ., ~ ' ':\/ 'i;'<'i ,,r .' ~!) ,, ,,,, {ADJUST SSI.IH RII.I TO NEW GRADE) ···A';'. -. '-(l'J' HI,, ( a•,! /',\,',,, / 57,4 \ /,, g U,OJr; MN. ',.-. CQNf\£CT FUT\lRE \ -" ,,,-LOT 1 tt00$E£ \ _,. ORI\IEWAY DRAINAGE'., ' \ .,,-,,.-r-g TO YARD DRAIN . . " \ / -/ -lf/1-.,, \ ,,-111[-10 1 tWF-8 ~ ..?.;,)II \ // I " ~ \ / . \ WF-27"M , \ .,-~• ' '-_,,.,,,. ~\Yf-11 WF~'"'I ' ~-<'1_ WF-20 -~-19 \ 1 \\ ' ~~ WF~ M _ ---+!l"M'-12 -_.. 'M"-29!ij ' \ljf-14M-""" ii,,. I ri-29 ' \ '<,,. Wl'-6$1 v.(-111lt. 'v /.·, ;' ·'. i 11 ! ~ " WETLAND .·, ' ./. 26,10a ,so._n-. ·, .. ,_ v.y-'-,s \ . v"' :! _, ,,,' •!i.' 1"/c''· '/l "' '0''"' WC-' . ' ·11- .. w,,-\.7' ~ ~ ,· <"' ·"" 11,,,,, ''-'· I<_<~ A II , v:• '< I" -WF-~ ~~:w--4 '~., .,_.,. WETLAND DtliNEATION BY ALDER NORTf,IWl:ST CRflDPEI ~f.1 .. 1:l?T:t PYfB E'6 12" SI) \ MATCH EX. PA\'ING INV--409,49 1 CON 0 S~CT At LOW POINT CONSTRUCT NEW 0,5' VERllCAL' CURB/Ql.rnE!I;, II' P\..J,K'IER STRIP & 6' SIDEWALi< ,,, ""~''\ Ell: ~'\y~~A .... "-- ,iNE,,.,9,tR, : S · ,... omcAnoN. I J --+--jff- ~ ,.>, 2 7,912 so n. · \ \ '( I., 0 5 ,o 20 JO ·";'_~:_c"'c'C-------~~1l:E 1 ~ --~""" 1En41J:I: RECONSlRUC 1 :o<Vc.,........, AT WEST END TO PRO'IIDE 5' SIDEWALK ""c ~--------RElOCAlE EX. WATER ,RtlAOVE/REPlACE CURB & GUm:R TO 32' FROM OPPOS!TE CURBLINE " ,,DRIVEWAY CONSlRUCT NEW CURB & GUTTER J2' FFIOM EXISTING CURB &: GUTTER ON NORlH SIDE Of' STREET I 20· JOINT 11cctss}U11u1\ EASEMENT ~ a ('.'' , ""'P<""' 6' SS SER'¥1CE °'""' ,IE.,410.9± I\ Site Plan 1" 60' Vicinity Map Sf r NO. 11 KING COUNTY AREA, WASHINGTON (RENTON QUADRANGLE) SECTION2 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY SECTION 3 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS Project Overview This project involves the development of a vacant 1.92 acre parcel into two single-family lots in zoning R-8. The parcel is vacant and it is mostly covered with heavy vegetation with significant trees. The site generally slopes down to southwest at approximately I 0%±. Per the SCS Soil maps, the site is underlain with Alderwood, gravelly sandy loam (AgC). This is confirmed in the attached Geotechnical Evaluation prepared by Geospectrum Consultants Inc. The southwest of the parcel is covered with wetland category II. -See attached reports. Upstream Drainage Undetermined upstream properties to the north, west and south of the site appear to into the onsite wetland. This will have no impact on the development of this project. Downstream Drainage The developable portion of the northeast portion of the site drains southwest to the onsite wetland. Runoff from the wetland drains into and 18-inch storm pipe located at the south property line (A). This 18-inch storm system drains south across the ball field of the adjacent school grounds (B), collection in a CB located adjacent to the north side of NE gth Street (C), and then southwest to the south side of NE 8th Street (D), about 500-feet downstream from the project site. The 18-inch storm system continues south between houses, crossing NE 7th PL (E) and becoming 24-inch pipe. The pipe continues south, then west (F) to a large wooded pond/wetland (G), another 600-feet downstream. Flows exist the pond south continuing through a wooded stream area to well beyond V. mile downstream from the project site. There were no apparent downstream drainage problems. =:, 210 ~' .._/ 1~3 1 w z ........ ) """""I I I I ' ) I I • tQ ~ ~ =l-_r:::~;::=~,_,/-0r., I r I ~ 0 -P L ClJ I E: I ClJ L o::i / / \ I ) \. I \ ffli"" I ""t'"" I <-I ........ C -·· Downstream Drainage Map 1" = 150' SECTION 4 FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Drainage Design Because the development of this project will result in less than 0.1 CFS increase of the 100-year runoff as estimated using the KCRTS computer model per the Renton standards, detention is not required. A combination of full and basic dispersion will be used, discharging towards the onsite wetland. -See attached KCRTS Analysis , Encompass Engineering & Surveying Eastern Washington Division 407 Swiftwater Blvd., Cle Elum, WA 98922 Phone (509) 674-7433 Fax (509) 674-7419 Western Washington Division 165 NE Juniper St, Suite 201, Issaquah, WA 98027 Phone (425) 382-0250 Fax (425) 391-3055 SHEETNQ __ _ ----QF ______ _ CALCULATED BY ---JV'-'-~-----DATE 3/t'l;//5 CHECKED BY ________ DATE------ SCALE---------------~ . rtfv,t~~71:f?£7l~V A, ~ r5f..JT 112fi: '?'I ff;-::=--.. l , <J Z AC:.-, -r,qz.:::-J.JL <2,fef2A'c {L0'fS) Aa, -... 1l f:-D ,e, r'I-'iJ o A.i ,t(l,t r4 ~ o . o _::f A-c- A.c,..' -=-0 A-p -=-D.bttf-lr (r-i,n.u,T, T/LL-) :5C-4-U2-r"'c!Z:;&. =5> vs ff\.;~ /C-C/Z TS ST 1,(:) ('?ee rf7/2'"'rouy _ ~ S.CJ7tf c:cr:s. , Encompass Engineering & Surveying JOB __ _ Eastern Washington Division 407 Swiftwater Blvd., Cle Elum. WA 98922 Phone (509) 674-7433 Fax (509) 674-7419 ""' estern \V ashington Division SHEET NO. __ CALCULATED BY ______ DATE ----- 165 NE Juniper St., Suite 20 I, Issaquah, WA 98027 Phone (425) 382-0250 Fax (425) 391-3055 CHECKED BY ______ DATE ____ _ SCALE------------~ --r(U)µTfl--~e _ ,~m_o_._v~lk-__ 1 __ ~-_ji, __ ._-__ l> ___ · ___ -_ w_---_·_-_, __ -_l,_ L-_·----·~_-___ · ___ -:._ 1 __ 2 ___ jfl.L __ • ___ · --_-?fJl ___ -___ .-.-__ -_-_ i>_-_·-_-.-. 1 ~Tb EK, .t'z~nW1 -'5tr'5lltf':.Lt.. wfo A-1?/?f/_tJ"-'1-L .· T)e,{f,-T[c>ly -----•---------· --------· -·-·-... -·· · ___ ·--- -LoT z_ Wt<...L H11-vt2 ~JC.. T2tt;..f~ll7/.o/U ___ -·---_ Lor-. I MD 'JlJu...,T PPcl/~ /,A!L~ t-/xi.u_12 rLILL '[)t;fff1c$1011.) __ .. __ -•• ,__ -- -l)fl:12-J:.c,s wo .,....,_.) 4t>~O. SF p~ r.o.T L4flc/J"'1ob.s _ -"" -----. ··----, \ ' ""'" -----":-~· -··-· ---·--·-···-'·-·· --· ~elk.is<.:: U)"t ( \ '7l)11,.J_'t_-_ ])fZ.u)/l.,UJri-y WtLL r/A-ue F,uLL Dl '?fL 12 7 /it)/1.// petL /:-_{-,f,(,,l.i~ J:-'7 -·-- -· "1'Hfi__'( wt'--L. l31t ____ Vl,,(.L)~&:L..c A-s ttx:,% -A~ ;:Q)05s~f-flGD1 t-· .. -·-4tDDD7f/'2-_ _ . . -W6Nf/l'tfz-_ ( 50(1 ./;..IZAlG ~r.u_ ........ D.1 T h_ .. c'."Oll "). -. ---·-· ·-L ~'(., J>11pra~,p,...,,~ ::: 0, IO;tG lE> t __ z___ _ _ •-·-···-·'-----~ Apt ':;'. 4oi90'7r i J~f7~-;:.. · !9, lJAc.-f~17Gl(/r t_f _ tlp'Z,::. C),61--~ D 'IO -Q.( 3 ~ _(f),ij_it~sl(J,A.cTv, (/5I~ct.. ~C:12,Y-5 (5-eE, -ff2-rAJTtJtl}- 4)rec>~B .---· ---~-__ tJ, 1~$-. --v --·-· -·-·-·-·-· 4G)<oo~-Q1,90~~;---Ql'°o~,.: = .tJ.JfCj_~_(),tJ{f~io:eiq5-;Ps- 6J, 01 S ,L.__ 6), f c "f? _ ·--- q-~WIVf'lP-l'v---~T--- ------··•··--.P<i?:lP-•----··-.-- Encompass Engineering & Surveying Eastern Washington Division 407 Switiwater Blvd., Cle Elum, WA 98922 Phone (509) 674-7433 Fax (509) 674-7419 Western Washington Division 165 NE Juniper St., Suite 20 l, Issaquah, WA 98027 Phone (425) 382-0250 Fax (425) 391-3055 SHEET NO. ---- CALCULATED BY ________ DATE------- CHECKED BY _________ DATE------- SCALE l ao 1-: "'k'Pc ./--{ )~$ f.C . e__::Jt;,,v-. l)~J -. -c__r11e>...,~__J) . t-_'Z.-~--400 ;,=: ... - . (l?W!i O.vwTI>J ~ :i'7qZ-2F <:::::_ Sooo -s? rer '""'~---~---=::;,,-· ·······. ······--· R,,, KCRTS Existing Conditions Peaks Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:15517u.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.042 2 2/09/01 18:00 0.012 7 1/06/02 3:00 0.031 4 2/28/03 3:00 0.001 8 3/24/04 20:00 0.019 6 1/05/05 8:00 0.033 3 1/18/06 21:00 0.027 5 11/24/06 4:00 0.054 1 1/09/08 9:00 Computed Peaks -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- --Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0.054 1 100.00 0.990 0.042 2 25.00 0.960 0.033 3 10.00 0.900 0.031 4 5.00 0.800 0.027 5 3.00 0.667 0.019 6 2.00 0.500 0.012 7 1. 30 0.231 0.001 8 1.10 0.091 0.050 50.00 0.980 KCRTS Developed Conditions Peaks Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:15517d.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.068 4 2/09/01 2:00 0.044 6 1/05/02 16:00 0.084 2 2/27/03 7:00 0.033 8 8/26/04 2:00 0.043 7 10/28/04 16:00 0. 072 3 1/18/06 16: 00 0.066 5 11/24/06 3:00 0.149 1 1/09/08 6:00 Computed Peaks -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- --Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0.149 1 100.00 0.990 0.084 2 25.00 0.960 0.072 3 10.00 0.900 0.068 4 5.00 0. 800 0.066 5 3.00 0.667 0.044 6 2.00 0.500 0.043 7 1. 30 0.231 0.033 8 1.10 0. 091 0.128 50.00 0.980 LlQ100 -Q100 DEV -Q100 EX= 0.149 -0.054 = 0.095 <.l CFS Q100-,x Q100-DEV SECTION 5 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN SECTION 6 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES GEOSPECTRUM CONSUL,ANTS1 INC. ---r:-; __ /-' .. , . ': *h'W~ ,cf:i-/. . "._; f':·: ~-,'1. :-~, ------·-------·----------··---· ---------~--------~----------_______ ;;·: ... · ,.,. .,, ~ f •• ~. ,_ .:·.···--,te-,-f-1 r,,·c~•1 t=ng1na.or1·ng ..... c'"'lnc:i Earth Sc:iences •..7 ,::::;:· r...~, _,. : ! -.,_,d . !.... • ! ._~ - --------... ---------------------·------·-· -- March 11, 2015 Mr. Peter St. Pierre Forest Contracting 27018 233m Place SE Renton, WA 98038 --------·--------·--·--------------------------' SUBJECT: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Proposed Campbell Short Plat KCPN 1023059095, 4400 Block NE 9th Street Renton, Washington Project No. 15-107-01 Dear Peter, This report presents the results of our geotechnical evaluation for the site of your proposed new residential development on the subject property. The purpose of our work was to provide geotechnical engineering evaluations of the site including storm water infiltration feasibility and geotechnical recommendations for the residential development including design of foundations, site grading, site drainage and erosion control. Our work was performed in accordance with the scope and conditions of our proposal dated March 2, 2015. A site topographic map and short plat plan (see Figure 2) was provided to us and was used as a reference for our evaluations. Based on our review of the plan provided and discussions with you, we understand that the property will be divided into 2 lots plus Tract A (wetlands) and Tract B (storm water/utilities). We assume that the residential development will include a new 2-to 3-story wood-frame residence on each of the new lots. The structures are expected to include ground level garages which will have slab- on-grade floors and the remainder of structures may have raised floors with crawl space or slab-on-grade. We assume that bearing wall loads will be in the range of about 2 to 3 kif and maximum column loads to be in the range of about 1 O to 20 kips. If actual structural loads exceed the above values by more than 25%, this office should be notified. Review of the Renton online Sensitive Areas Maps indicates that the property is not indicated to be within a Steep Slope Hazard, Landslide Hazard, Erosion Hazard, Seismic Hazard or Coal Mine Hazard area. Forest Contracting March 11, 2015 SCOPE OF WORK Our geotechnical evaluation included review of geologic mapping, site explorations, engineering analyses and evaluations and the preparation of this report. The scope of work included the following specific tasks: o Review of published geologic mapping and USDA soil mapping of the site vicinity. o Performed a reconnaissance of the site. o Observed and logged four test pit explorations on the site (see Figure 2) to depths up to 6 feet below existing ground. Logs of the test pits and results of field and laboratory testing are presented in the Test Pit summaries of Appendix A. o Performed geotechnical engineering evaluations of infiltration feasibility and the proposed site development and developed our geotechnical recommendations for infiltration foundation design and site grading. o Prepared this geotechnical report summarizing our findings and recommendations. OBSERVED SITE CONDITIONS The property is bordered on the north and east by developed residential lots (and 9th Street NE) on the south by an existing play field and on the west by undeveloped land. At the time of our field exploration the property was un-developed as shown in Figure 2. The topographic mapping included on the site plan of Figure 2 indicates that the proposed new lots area generally slopes gently to very gently down to the west/southwest at gradients that range from only about 3 to 17 percent and the remainder of the property ( approximately the western 2/3) is near flat. The site was well vegetated with primarily alder trees with occasional evergreen trees and understory that included grasses, salal, and blackberries. We did not observe any seeps or springs or evidence of current or past erosion on the site. We did however observe standing water within the area of the mapped wetland (Tract A). Project No. 15-107-01 Page 2 Forest Contracting March 11, 2015 Subsoils Our evaluation of the subsurface conditions was based on our observations of three exploratory test pits within the proposed eastern new lot area plus a fourth test pit within Tract B as well as review of published geologic mapping and USDA soil mapping. Approximate locations of the test pits are shown on Figure 2. Logs of the test pits are presented in Appendix A. Subsoils encountered in our test pits were found to include some minor fill and natural glacially consolidated soils. Fill soils were encountered in TP-3 located at the northwest quadrant of Lot 1. Fill soils were silty very fine sand with occasional gravel and were only about 3 feet thick at that location. Natural soils encountered at the test pit locations were generally silty fine to very fine sand with occasional gravel. At TP-2 we encountered a strata of sandy silt soils at a depth of about 2.5 feet which extended down to the hard cemented soils. The upper soils were typically loose to depths of about 2 to 3 feet below the natural surface becoming medium dense, dense and very dense to hard and cemented at depths of about 3 to 4 feet below the natural surface. Ground Water No ground water or seepage was observed in any of the test pits on the proposed Lots 1 and 2, but red-brown mottling was observed in TP-1 on Lot 2 at depths of 3 to 4 feet and ground water seepage was observed at a depth of about 2.5 feet in TP-4 within Tract B. Typically the shallow soils were classified as moist to very moist and the deeper cemented soils were classified as moist. The measured moisture contents of the soils generally ranged from about 13 to 22 percent within the upper soils. Subsurface Variations Based on our experience, it is our opinion that some variation in the continuity and depth of subsoil deposits and ground water levels should be anticipated due to natural deposition variations and previous onsite structures and grading. Due to seasonal moisture changes, ground water conditions should be expected to change with time. Care should be exercised when interpolating or extrapolating subsurface soils and ground water conditions between or beyond our test pits. Project No. 15-107-01 Page 3 Forest Contracting March 11, 2015 SITE EVALUATIONS General The referenced geologic map of Figure 1 indicates the site vicinity to have surface exposures of glacial till (Qgt) soils. The Qgt glacial till soils are highly consolidated, heterogeneous mixtures of sand, silt, clay and gravel soils deposited during the advance of the Vashon glaciation, the last glacial advance into the Puget Sound area, approximately 13,000 to 16,000 years ago. Based on the soils observed on the site and review of the referenced map, it is our opinion that the natural soils underlying the property and are glacially consolidated till deposits (Qgt). Based on the results of our field investigations combined with our own experience and judgment, it is our opinion that the geotechnical site conditions are suitable for the proposed development provided our recommendations are followed. Hazard Assessment Landslide: The Renton Sensitive Areas Maps indicate the site is not within a Landslide Hazard area. In addition, the geologic map of Figure 1 indicates no mapped landslides within the site vicinity and our site observations indicate the site is currently stable. Considering the gentle to very gentle slope gradients and the observed glacial till soils, it is our opinion that the potential for future instability on the site is very low to nil. Erosion: The Renton Sensitive Areas Maps indicate the site is not within a Erosion Hazard area. We observed that the site is well vegetated we observed no indication of any seepage or concentrated water flow or current or past erosion on the site. Based on our site observations and explorations it is our opinion that there is no unusual erosion risk at this site and any potential erosion potential resulting from development will be mitigated by our recommended grading procedures and drainage/erosion control measures and by final re-vegetation/landscaping incorporated into the proposed development plans. Coal Mine: The Renton Sensitive Areas Maps indicate the site is not within a Coal Mine Hazard area. Seismic: The Puget Sound region is a seismically active area. About 17+ moderate to large earthquakes (MS to M?+) have occurred in the Puget Sound and northwestern Cascades region since 1872 (143 years) including the 2/28/01 M6.8 Nisqually earthquake and it is our opinion that the proposed structures will very likely experience significant ground shaking during their useful life. Project No. 15-107-01 Page 4 Forest Contracting March 11, 2015 Based on a recently published study the site lies only about 2 miles south of the southern mapped location of the Seattle fault and about 19 miles southwest of the estimated trace of the South VVhidbey-Lake Alice fault both of which have postulated maximum credible magnitudes of 7.0 to 7.5. Another recent study of the Vashon- Tacoma area presents evidence for the east-west trending Tacoma Fault which is indicated to pass through the south end of Vashon and the middle of Maury Island about 11 miles southwest of the site. The study suggests that the Tacoma Fault and the Seattle fault may be linked by a master thrust fault at depth. The Seattle fault has been documented to have moved at its west end (Bainbridge Island) about 1000 to 1100 years ago and evidence of movement at the east end has also recently been documented. Some experts feel that the recurrence interval between large events on the Seattle Fault may be on the order of several thousands of years but our calculations indicate it may be on the order of 1200 to 1400 years. The activity of the documented Tacoma fault is considered to be on the same order as the Seattle fault. The recurrence of a maximum credible event on the South Whidbey fault is not known but some experts have assigned a recurrence of about 3000 years, however smaller events will occur more frequently as evidenced by the 5.3 event on May 2, 1996 which was attributed to that fault. In addition to Puget Sound seismic sources, a great earthquake event (MS to M9+) has been postulated for the Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ) along the northwest Pacific coast of Oregon, Washington and Canada. The current risk of a future CSZ event is not known at this time. Published reports have indicated recurrence intervals for a CSZ event to range from as little as 100-200 years to as long as 1000+ years and the time of the last event is reported to have been about 315 years ago. Considering all of the above, it is our opinion that the proposed structures will very likely experience significant ground shaking during their useful life. The 2012 International Building Code (/BC) adopted by the City of Renton requires that a Maximum Considered Earthquake Geometric Mean (MCEG) ground motion peak horizontal ground acceleration (PGA) be used for site liquefaction evaluations but that the IBC Design Earthquake which is defined as 2/3 of the MCEG ground motions may be used for consideration in other geotechnical seismic site evaluations for new construction. The MCEG PGA of the 2012 IBC is based on consideration of both probabilistic ground motions with a 2475-year recurrence interval and deterministic ground motions based on a model of known fault locations and characteristics adjusted for site specific soil conditions. Per section 1803.5.12(2) of the 2012 /BC, we have estimated the MCEG PGA for this site to be about 0.57g in accordance with Section 11.8.3 of ASCE 7-10. We estimate the IBC Design Earthquake ground motion PGA for this site to be 0.38g. Please note that the Design Earthquake ground motion PGA is not intended for structural analyses. Spectral accelerations per the 2012 IBC should be considered in structural design. This site is considered to be a Site Class D per the IBC definitions. Project No. 15-107-01 Page 5 Forest Contracting March 11, 2015 Secondary seismic hazards due to earthquake ground shaking include induced slope failure, liquefaction, lateral spreading and ground settlement. Considering the very dense/hard nature of the soils recommended for bearing at the site, it is our evaluation that the potential for damage to the structures due to liquefaction, lateral spreading and settlement is very low to nil. The potential for seismically induced shallow failures is also considered very low to nil. Storm Water Infiltration Feasibility Feasibility of storm water infiltration was evaluated in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDMJ Appendix C -Small Project Drainage Requirements criteria. Section C.2.2.2, 1 a) of KCSWDM Appendix C states that the infiltration soils "cannot be comprised of fill materials" and Section C.2.2.2, 1 b) of KCSWDM Appendix C states that the depth to "the maximum wet season water table or hardpan must be at least 3 feef'. Section C.2.2.2 requires the natural soils for Full Infiltration must be clean "coarse sands or cobbles or medium sands" however Section C.2.3.2 allows Limited Infiltration into "fine sands, loamy sands, sandy loams or loams". Natural permeable soils encountered at the test pit locations were generally classified as silty fine to very fine sand with occasional gravel and were underlain by very dense to hard and cemented impermeable glacial till soils at depths of 3 to 4 feet below the natural surface. At TP-2 we encountered a sandy silt strata at a depth of about 2.5 feet which extended down to the hard cemented soils. The upper soils were typically loose to depths of about 2 to 3 feet below the natural surface becoming medium dense to dense. At TP-4 within Tract B we encountered ground water at a depth of 2.5 feet. Review of USDA soil survey mapping of the site vicinity indicates the site to expose Alderwood gravelly sandy loam soils (AgC). The Alderwood soils are described as gravelly sandy loam to 7 inches and very gravelly sandy loam from 7 to 59 inches with ground water or restrictive layer at 20 to 39 inches. Considering the above criteria and the fact that no clean coarse sands, cobbles or medium sands were encountered at any of the test pits, in our opinion the general site is not suitable for Full Infiltration per the criteria of KCSWDM Appendix C. However we observed 3 to 4 feet of permeable natural silty fine to very fine sand soils above the impermeable hard cemented soils at all of the test pit locations on the proposed new Lots 1 and 2 and in our opinion Limited Infiltration is feasible on Lots 1 and 2 per the criteria of KCSWDM Appendix C. Three feet of fill was encountered at TP-3 on Lot 1 but we observed 3 feet of natural permeable soils beneath the fill and overlying the hard cemented soils at TP-3, therefore that location also meets the minimum criteria for Limited Infiltration provided that infiltration systems are placed within the natural soils. Considering that ground water was encountered at a depth of only 2.5 feet at TP-4 in Tract B, it is our opinion that the subsoil conditions at Tract B do not meet the above Project No. 15-107-01 Page 6 Forest Contracting March 11, 2015 referenced requirements of KCSWDM Appendix C for storm water infiltration and is therefore infiltration on Tract 8 is not considered feasible. All infiltration systems should be constructed at least 1 foot above the surface of the impervious hard cemented soil layers encountered in our explorations per the requirements of Section C.2.2.2 of the 2009 KCSWM. If there is inadequate available space on the site for limited infiltration of all onsite storm water runoff, dispersion BMP methods may be used per Sections C.2.1 and C.2.4 of the 2009 KCSWM with the exception that we do not recommend the use of splash blocks (C.2.4.2). In addition we recommend that rock pads (C.2.4.3) and gravel filled dispersion trenches should be located at least 15 feet in the downslope direction away from the structure. Final grades around the structure should be sloped to drain away from the structure and dispersion trenches should be placed so that the dispersed storm flow will not be directed towards the structure or other neighboring structures. Structure Support Considerations In our opinion the undisturbed very dense/hard natural glacial till soils encountered in our explorations should provide good support for the proposed structure foundations. Bearing soils are expected to be encountered at depths ranging from about 2 to 3.5 feet below the natural ground surface at the site. Foundations should penetrate through any existing fill, topsoil and loose/medium dense soils to bear on undisturbed very dense/hard natural soils. Conventional spread footings are considered appropriate for support of the proposed structures considering that bearing soils are at shallow depths. However, if any deep fill areas are encountered on the site, lean concrete footing extensions or pipe piles could be used to transfer foundation loads to the deep bearing soils in those areas. We have included recommendations for spread footings and pipe piles in this report. RECOMMENDATIONS The following subsections present our recommendations for design of foundations, retaining walls, site grading, drainage control and erosion control. Also included are recommendations for plan review and observations and testing during construction. Spread Footing Foundations Conventional spread footings founded on undisturbed very dense/hard natural glacial till soils should provide good support for the proposed structures. Bearing soils are expected to be encountered at depths ranging from about 3 to 4 feet below the natural ground surface of the site (below any fill soils on the site). Project No. 15-107-01 Page 7 Forest Contracting Ma;ch 11, 2015 Continuous wall footings should be at least 18 inches wide. Square footings for column support should be at least 24 inches wide. Footings supported on undisturbed very dense/hard natural glacial till soils may be designed based on an allowable bearing pressure of 2000 psf. All footings should be founded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade. Where the natural bearing soils slope, the footing excavation should be stepped to maintain a horizontal bearing surface. If deep fill or other unsuitable soils are encountered, foundation loads may be transferred from the recommended minimum foundation depths to the recommended very dense/hard bearing soils by a monolith of lean concrete having a minimum compressive strength of 1000 psi. The width of an un-reinforced lean concrete monolith should be at least as wide as the footing or at least one-third of the monolith height, whichever is greater. Reinforced monoliths should be designed by a structural engineer. A suitable width trench should be excavated with a smooth edged excavator bucket (no teeth) to expose the dense/very dense bearing soils under observation by our office and backfilled as soon as possible with the lean concrete to the footing elevation. The estimated settlement of a properly constructed 18-inch wide continuous footing carrying a load of 3 kips per foot is on the order of 1/4 to 1/2 inch. Our settlement estimates assume that foundations are supported on undisturbed very dense/hard natural bearing soils and that all fill and loose/disturbed material is removed from the bearing surface prior to concrete pour. Maximum differential settlement within the proposed structures is expected to be 112 inch or less. Settlements are expected to occur primarily during construction. Resistance to lateral loads can be assumed to be provided by friction acting at the base of foundations and by passive earth pressure A coefficient of friction of 0.45 may be assumed with the dead load forces in contact with on-site soils. An allowable static passive earth pressure of 250 psf per foot of depth may be used for the sides of footings poured against undisturbed medium dense natural soils or properly compacted structural fill. An allowable static passive earth pressure of 150 psf per foot of depth may be used for the sides of footings or grade beams poured against existing loose soils. The vertical and lateral bearing values indicated above are for the total dead load plus frequently applied live loads. For short duration dynamic loading caused by seismic or wind forces, the vertical bearing values may be increased by 50 percent and allowable lateral passive pressures may be increased by 33 percent. Project No. 15-107-01 Page 8 Forest Contracting March 11, 2015 Retaining Walls Cantilevered retaining walls as referred to in this report are walls which yield or move outward during and after backfilling. Actual wall movements will depend on the wall design and method of backfilling and can range from 0.1% to 0.3% of the wall height. Design pressures for cantilevered walls given below assume that the top of the wall will deflect at least 0.15% of the wall height. Design of wall foundations should be in accordance with the recommendations presented in this report. Static design of permanent cantilevered retaining walls which support a horizontal surface of properly compacted clean free-draining granular material may be based on an equivalent fluid density of 40 pcf. These pressures assume that there is no wat~r pressure with the wall backfill. An additional uniform lateral pressure due to backfill surcharge should be computed using a coefficient of 0.27 times the uniform vertical surcharge load. Static design of walls supporting horizontal backfill and structurally braced against movement should be based on an equivalent fluid density of 60 pcf. This pressure assumes that the wall supports a horizontal backfill of properly compacted free-draining granular material and that there is no water pressure behind the wall. Uniform lateral pressure due to a uniform vertical surcharge behind a braced wall should be computed using a coefficient of 0.43 times the uniform vertical surcharge load. Seismic design of retaining walls should include a dynamic soil loading. Dynamic soil pressure should be assumed to have an inverted triangular distribution. Based on a 0.38g IBC ground motion level the dynamic soil pressure at the top of the wall should be at least 25H (psf) where H is the height of the wall above the footing base. The dynamic soil pressure should diminish linearly to zero at the base of the wall. Combined static plus dynamic soil pressure should be used for seismic design of the walls. Care should be exercised in compacting backfill against retaining walls. Heavy equipment should not approach retaining walls close enough to intrude within a 1: 1 line drawn upward from the bottom of the wall. Backfill close to walls should be placed and compacted with hand-operated equipment. Recommendations for placement and compaction of structural fill are presented under "Site Grading". Design wall pressures given above assume no water pressure behind the wall. We recommend that a drainage zone be provided behind all walls and a adequate drain system be provided at the base of the walls. Wall drains should consist of a four-inch diameter perforated PVC drain pipe placed in at least one cubic foot of drain gravel per lineal foot along the base of the wall. Drain gravel should be washed material with particle sizes in the range of 3/4 to 1-1/2 inches. As a minimum, the drainage zone within the upper wall should consist of a Miradrain drainage mat or equivalent attached to the wall surface for the full height and Project No. 15-107-01 Page 9 Forest Contracting March11,2015 embedded into the drain gravel at the base of the wall. As an alternative a sand drainage zone could be placed the full height of the wall with a horizontal width equal to at least 1 foot. Backfill within the drainage zone should be a clean sand/gravel mixture with less than 5 percent fines based on the sand fraction. A membrane of Mirafi 140 filter fabric or equivalent should be provided between the drainage zone material and onsite silty soil backfill. The drainage zone backfill should be capped with 12 inches of silty soils to reduce surface water infiltration. Site Grading Site grading is expected to consist primarily of excavation for proposed foundations and subgrade preparation for slab and pavement areas and utility trenches. Onsite granular soils cleaned of debris and organics are considered suitable for use in general compacted fills but in our experience the onsite glacial till soils will be moisture sensitive with regard to grading and compaction characteristics. Grading should be scheduled for the late summer months if possible. Wet weather grading may require the use of imported clean granular fill soils which are more easily compacted at higher moisture levels. Recommendations for site preparation, temporary excavations, structural fill, subgrade preparation, site drainage and trench backfill are presented below. Site Preparation: Existing vegetation, debris, fill soils, and loose or organic natural soils should be stripped from the areas that are to be graded. During rough grading, excess soils may be stockpiled for later use. Stripping in subgrade areas is expected to average about 1 foot. Soils containing more than 1 % by weight of organics may be used in planter areas, but should not be used for structural fill. Stumps, debris and trash, plus rocks and rubble over 6 inches in size, should be removed from the site. Subsoil conditions on the site may vary from those encountered in our test pits. Therefore, our office should observe the prepared areas prior to placement of any new fills. Temporary Excavations: Sloped temporary construction excavations may be used where planned excavation limits will not undermine existing structures or interfere with other construction. Where there is not enough room for sloped excavations, shoring should be provided. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered in the test pits, it is our opinion that sloped temporary excavations may be made vertically to depths of 4 feet or less. Excavations up to 10 feet in depth should be sloped no steeper than 1: 1 within loose/medium dense soils and no steeper than %: 1 (horizontal:vertical) within the un- weathered, hard natural glacial till soils. It should be noted that the contractor is responsible for safety and maintenance of construction slopes. We recommend that cuts over 4 feet in depth be covered with visqueen tarp to help control ravelling and sloughing. Surface drainage should be directed away from the top Project No. 15-107-01 Page 10 Forest Contracting March 11, 2015 edge of cut slopes. Surcharge loads should not be allowed within 5 feet of the top of the slope or within a 1 :1 (horizontal:vertical) plane extending up from the toe of excavation, whichever is greater. Structural Fill: Provided that soil moisture can be reduced and maintained near optimum, excavated onsite soils cleaned of organics and debris may be used for general structural fill but the onsite soils are expected to be moisture sensitive and during the rainy season the soils may become too wet for practical compaction. Therefore imported granular fill soils should be used if moisture conditions cannot be adequately controlled. Loose soils, formwork and debris should be removed prior to placing fill or backfill. Structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness and compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the ASTM D1557 test method. Imported granular fill should consist of clean, well-graded sand and gravel materials free of organic debris and other deleterious material. Imported material for wet weather grading should be a sand/gravel mixture with less than 5 percent fines based on the sand fraction. Slab/Pavement Support: Slabs-on-grade and pavement should be supported directly on undisturbed dense natural soils or on properly compacted structural fill over dense natural soils. Where unsuitable soils (existing fill, loose and organic soils) exist at subgrade level, subgrade preparation should include excavation of the unsuitable soils as required to expose medium dense natural soils or to a maximum depth of 2 feet (or deeper as required to remove all organic soils where organic soil depths exceed 2 feet below final subgrade) and placement of structural fill to final subgrade elevation. Subgrade fill should be placed in accordance with the recommendations for structural fill except that the top 6 inches of the subgrade fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the ASTM D1557 maximum dry density in pavement and driveway areas. It should be noted that where the proposed slabs cross a fill/natural contact line, there will be a high risk of cracking. Risk of cracking can be reduced by placing construction joints at the contact and by proper steel reinforcement of the slab. Interior concrete slabs should be underlain by a capillary break consisting of a polyethylene vapor barrier of at least 6 mil thickness. Utility Trenches: Buried utility conduits should be bedded and backfilled around the conduit in accordance with the project specifications. Bedding material should extend from six inches below the pipe to six inches above the pipe. Where conduit underlies pavement or slabs-on-grade, the remaining backfill above the pipe should be placed and compacted in accordance with the recommendations for structural fill. If imported granular fill is used for trench backfill it should be capped with 12 inches of onsite silty soils. Project No. 15-107-01 Page 11 Forest Contracting March 11, 2015 Drainage Control Surface drainage from the site and adjoining upslope areas should be controlled and diverted around the development area in a non-erosive manner. Adequate positive drainage should be provided away from the structures and on the site in general to prevent water from ponding and to reduce percolation of water into subsoils. Granular backfill should be capped with paving or 6 inches of onsite silty soils. A desirable slope for surface drainage is 2% in landscaped areas and 1 % in paved areas. Roof drains should be tightlined into the storm drain system (no discharge on the ground surface) by a separate and independent drain pipe (no connection to any other drain pipes). A pennanent perimeter drain, independent of the roof drain system, should be placed adjacent to the base of the continuous exterior foundations. The drain should consist of a four-inch diameter perforated PVC drain pipe placed in at least one cubic foot of washed drain gravel per lineal foot along the base of the foundations. The drain gravel zone around the pipe should be encapsulated with a membrane of Mirafi 140 filter fabric or equivalent between the drainage zone and onsite silty soils. Erosion Control Although we observed no evidence of erosion, onsite soils are expected to be erodible when disturbed and exposed to concentrated water flows. Siltation fences or other detention devices should be provided around the downslope side of the disturbed site area and soil stockpile areas during construction to control the transport of eroded material. The lower edge of the silt fence fabric should have "J" shaped embedment in a trench extending at least 12 inches below the ground surface. Surface water flow should be collected in area drains and tightlined to the storm water system, no water should be discharged on the site unless via a properly designed and approved infiltration/dispersion system. Exposed final graded soil areas should be planted immediately with grass and deep rooted plants. Plan Review This report has been prepared to aid in the evaluation of this site and to assist the architect, structural and civil engineers in the design and construction of the project. It is recommended that this office be provided the opportunity to review the final design drawings and specifications to determine if the recommendations of this report have been properly implemented and to make any supplemental design recommendations which may be required. Project No. 15-107-01 Page 12 Forest Contracting March 11, 2015 Observations and Testing During Construction Recommendations presented in this report are based on the assumption that soil conditions exposed during construction will be observed by our office so that any necessary design changes or supplements may be made. Foundation excavations should be observed to verify that they expose undisturbed very dense/hard bearing soils and that excavations are free of loose and disturbed materials. All structural fill and slab/pavement subgrade areas should be observed by a representative of this office after stripping and prior to placing fill. Drainage control systems should be observed by our office to verify proper construction. Proper fill placement and compaction should be verified with field and laboratory density testing by a qualified testing laboratory. CLOSURE This report was prepared for specific application to the subject site and for the exclusive use of Forest Contracting and their representatives. The findings and conclusions of this report were prepared with the skill and care ordinarily exercised by local members of the geotechnical profession practicing under similar conditions in the same locality. We make no other warranty, either express or implied. Variations may exist in site conditions between those described in this report and actual conditions encountered during construction. Unanticipated subsurface conditions commonly occur and cannot be prevented by merely making explorations and performing reconnaissance. Such unexpected conditions frequently require additional expenditures to achieve a properly constructed project. If conditions encountered during construction appear to be different from those indicated in this report, our office should be notified. Respectfully submitted, GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC. James A. Doolittle Principal Engineer Encl: Figures 1 and 2 Appendix A Dist: 1/Addressee via email electronic copy 2/Encompass Engineering & Surveying Project No. 15-107-01 Page 13 ref: Geologic Map of the Renton Quadrangle by D. R. Mullineaux, USGS Map GQ-405, 1965 Scale: 1"~2000' SITE VICINITY GEOLOGIC MAP Proposed Campbell Short Plat KCPN 1023059095, 4400 Block NE 9th St Renton, Washington Proj. No.15-1 07 Date 3 /1 5 Figure 1 (j) ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ f) ;-; s:, "U ~ ~~ ~ £>. z § ~a p -0 "' ~ lfr~i I Ul lJl ~ j3: ,., o ·o _, :-;;, ,., iif 0 ~ ,l11 ,_. 0 ,_. !!?. ::J: .i:::,. CD g ~ ~1 to:+ ~ ,_. lJl O s:, ~t rt 11 ~ <O ,., C: g: ~ CD [/] "' rt ~ ~ " ·~, "'" L If {AD~lJS"I SSM11 Rl>.i TO N£W 0RAC€) f.OUND 2" BRASS CISC \'ilTH ")(' I It! CC~CR£k, r>J CASE, •J.Cl6'N t; I /--.1. ;°-111?00 o; CALCUlAED t,,QRlH IL-~-L. _______ .... L_ , ·"c' Lo· 9 ·.mi °' PR::'~t ,~ .-._..::, ~,-, '!"Vil i':.I It I / 20· CURl:IC\.IT I DRl'vEWAY ENfflA.NCE CONSlRUCT N'E:W 0.5' YErrnc.J . LOT 11 "r ~ x" -US CUL~~-;--------------=t_ -· GAff"o Rll.l=-Ui.75 - 4C::;.14'1E ,---------------I "-..Cl£.l.Ot.E --·----~..Alti~t 409.40 1E ·---.-, ---:--------------r-~ J:'[~~:r---=--Etifl,£.D ~~ -=------- 0 tJlllll>' EASE!,!_ /,----"-·-·-··--saa-,...........,. ~"~ "~-CJLV~R ~_J,PV REC NO. blO!;l0205 5 /-, -.~c,:-----h,..........,...__ -----·-~b'r-1 ' "E --• ."'a. 50r0T32"E -----ffi."7f' -7 ~~7":'.;."7 __ _:o,a:r __ --------·---·--·----· ·--- ~-. TRAC T B flJU. rnsm~o" ~ BM? f OR ff./W'J'P· i-~~ •. STORMWA TER/UTILITY IMPRO'llSMENTii -~"sfts'~ 9,1~1 SQ. ~ r l.~0.0,0 "'<..!2):J_~ .... 11.1LL--4";.';,:!!'1 10.~1'.-~)§, 9'?~ .......... .;_ J'ft:.~ vj SO' , -CIJRB/C:UTIER. 8' fiLANlER ~Tfd..£......!t 5' SID_E.WAl.x ,, •' . --:........:..'S.: JiG \ I ' "6, ;..,"" \ll'ElLANO I y:;rf "'""'"o/-g ----~ "' 50' v.EllAND /: _ • / ' ' T)"f ·8 \ "' 81JFfEll ,. ,v 11 -~~:::~,( ' )\*' " ,e-,):\ \ ~ ~' ~--2D .• -~e.,g ' ·. 2 \\ I ' , 'ss --*•F ' \\ I \ .,.m• A.Sf' 1 hAL f DRl~~'J \ . I <"ll I ·1: r C/l H' ~· t'il I I t'il i i ~ 'k/ 'd ' I t< / { 0 ' ~ ~ H 0 ' z ...L- s:, e ,e-a,_x I ' --X 'I w I -- -_,,.-~IF-291 , ' WH<><:;_ , Wf·&Jr--OUFFE1 , / Xlii-z, 0 '· .:,~ ' ,, Lot B / '\ '\ ,, ~ \ T ACT A , w '"· ~~ ,,,,,.(_ ~-1,,\ \ -,,..,,itJ,c,,. ..1~ ...,..,, ·-""~il '----; · i.~~ \ ;<sg \ ' OTECTION X~H '\ I ASEMENT ..,.-/~ we ,x ~ / I •"!'LAND ,._.-~ ~ \ ~~];CR~~" -~~--_______. :' I .. ; \ \ -··----~ \ __ -j------f-l! 1•-'i,---------TI <l' P-1 , __ -----:---~-I \,:.,;":;·;,;>X:;,/=~=7'"'-•=-,f,--=-\ --t----1 ./ Ul'" ADS CUUi[RT 403.tl:.> 1(" • ' " i m ~ ;') 29:5,JT SS6"4:2'2?°E 7' CYQ.Cl',lf fENCf -EX SDN'-1 R.111 .. 4,::is_,..., 16"' A.VS N 40.3,Tl IE 38Lsw 17.5' UTIL!T'r i:ASBiE~T I R[C NO. 80tll:>2404}" ...J TI:r BE VAtATi:'.l I~,!:) 4 l"1Tf"' ·--- \ii£Tu,,r,.D OEU~J10N·--·- BY A~DER NO'l:'llWt:Si ref: Pacific Peak Short Plat Site Plan, dated 2/9/15, prepared by Enca:npass Engineering I\ Surveying, reduced scale: 1"= 50' \ ;i ,\__ ~ ~ " .. I r 20' CUHOC\ -OfiNEWAl' 0..lRANCE: r~ r~ ( LOT 1( 20' ACCESS/UII ~ASEM[NT '--FOUNu 1/ STA.Ml'EO 0.; '',V LO"i 13 / -fOJNll 1/2 STP.kJi-'EC "1 o.n·r_ ti· woou FfNCE , .. , ,,,-s> •• ·-· 7" C'l'Cl.0,,,f F£NCE • Forest Contracting March 11, 2015 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION Our field exploration included a site reconnaissance and test pit explorations. During the site reconnaissance, the surface site conditions were noted, and the locations of the test pits were approximately determined. The test pits were approximately located using existing property boundaries as a guide. The approximate locations of the test pits are shown on Figure 2. Test Pit elevations were estimated based on the topographic mapping shown on Figure 2. Test pits were advanced using a trackhoe excavator. Soils were continuously logged and classified in the field by visual examination, in accordance with the ASTM Soil Classification system. Logs of the test pits are presented on the test pit summary sheets A-1 and A-2. The test pit summaries include descriptions of the soils and pertinent field data. Soil consistency and moisture conditions indicated on the logs are interpretations based on the conditions observed in the field. Boundaries between soil strata indicated on the logs are approximate and actual transitions between strata may be gradual. Project No. 15-107-01 Page 14 • TEST PIT NO. 1 Logged by JAO Date. 3/6/15 Depth Blows Class. Soil Description 0 OL [Juff w:torganics .. SM Silty line Sand w/occ gravel to 2" & roots to 2" diameter 2 J 3 with weak cemetation 4 becomes very cemented Consistency Moisture Color loose medium ense dense · ve~ ~~rtfe/ moist to very morst moist dark bm brown gra~ & red-bm qrav- orown Elevation: 409' W(%) Comments 17.5 15.1 difficult drggmg --f--+--+----------1----+----+---+---+-----f Maximum depth 5 feet. 6 No ground water observed. 7 TEST PIT NO. 2 Logged by JAD Date: 3/6/15 Depth Blows Class. Soil Description Consistency Moisture Elevation: 416' Color W(%) Comments 0 -,..-..,..,,,,... ..... ,,...,...,,.----,--------,----,----,-,---,-..,....,..,.-,.---,------1 QL _ [)uff ~ organics loose moist ___ dark t>rn SM Silty very fine Sand w/gravel to 2" & roots to 1" 2 3 ML Sandy Silt very fine 4 cemented 5 Maximum depth 5 ft. 6 No ground water observed. 7 GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC. ~--,, Geotechnica/ Engineering and Earth Sciences hard to b8?wn verv red-brn morst verv morst moist gray Proposed Campbell Short Plat 13.3 22.2 difficult drggrng KCPN 1023059095, 4400 Block NE gth St Renton, Washington Proj. No.15-107 Date 3/15 Figure A-1 • Logged by JAO Date 316115 Depth Blows Class. 0 OL 1 SM 2 3 SM 4 5 6 7 Logged by JAD Date: 316/15 Depth Blows Class. TEST PIT NO. 3 Soil Description Consistency Moisture Duff wlorganics .. loose moist Silty very frce Sand I 2,, to w ace grave to very & abundant roots moist Silty fine Sand w/occ gravel to 2" m.dense dense ---· cemented hard moist Maximum depth 6.5 feet No ground water observed. TEST PIT NO. 4 Soil Description Consistency Moisture Elevation: 412' Color W(%) Comments dark brn FILL brown & gark- 16.6 rown & black light brown 15.3 g~~n 13.1 giffiGult I 1n Elevation: 406' Color W(%) Comments O -,..--,...,,0.,.L-. _..,_ -. _"'Q-uff""_ .. &-0-rg-a-n""ic_s __ ------,-,l-oo_s_e _ _,_m_o_is_t_.....,._,.... _ _,. __ ..,,.. ___ -,1 .. d<!rl< brn 1 SM Silty fine-coarse Sand to w/occ. gravel lo 4" bfwn & abundant roots to 1-Y,'' 2 3 cemented ver:v moist ;e~::~e ~c\?st .. hard wet moist red-brn 20.4 gray ~f!2P??e\t 12.0 giffiGult 1gging 4+-+--+----------+----+----+----,.--+-----I 5 Maximum depth 4 ft 6 Ground water seepage at 2.5 feet 7 GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineering and Earth Sciences Proposed Campbell Short Plat KCPN 1023059095, 4400 Block NE 9th St Renton, Washington Proj. No.15-107 Date 3/15 Figure A-2 SECTION? OTHER PERMITS SECTION 8 ESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ' SECTION 9 BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT SECTION 10 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL GEOSPEC~UM CONSULf AN1'S, INC . . ~; ,;.:: c:i t t:.? c J-1 r1 .1 c--::..:i.: E..: rt::.,:;; f :"'J a E? r /.n .-;1 ----------·-------· --·---·--------·· --------. ------- March 11, 2015 Mr. Peter St. Pierre Forest Contracting 27018 233'd Place SE Renton, WA 98038 SUBJECT: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Proposed Campbell Short Plat KCPN 1023059095, 4400 Block NE 9th Street Renton, Washington Project No. 15-107-01 Dear Peter, This report presents the results of our geotechnical evaluation for the site of your proposed new residential development on the subject property. The purpose of our work was to provide geotechnical engineering evaluations of the site including storm water infiltration feasibility and geotechnical recommendations for the residential development including design of foundations, site grading, site drainage and erosion control. Our work was performed in accordance with the scope and conditions of our proposal dated March 2, 2015. A site topographic map and short plat plan (see Figure 2) was provided to us and was used as a reference for our evaluations. Based on our review of the plan provided and discussions with you, we understand that the property will be divided into 2 lots plus Tract A (wetlands) and Tract B (storm water/utilities). We assume that the residential development will include a new 2-to 3-story wood-frame residence on each of the new lots. The structures are expected to include ground level garages which will have slab- on-grade floors and the remainder of structures may have raised floors with crawl space or slab-on-grade. We assume that bearing wall loads will be in the range of about 2 to 3 kif and maximum column loads to be in the range of about 10 to 20 kips. If actual structural loads exceed the above values by more than 25%, this office should be notified. Review of the Renton online Sensitive Areas Maps indicates that the property is not indicated to be within a Steep Slope Hazard, Landslide Hazard, Erosiol') Hazard, Seismic Hazard or Coal Mine Hazard area. l \ c---, 1 -L ;.., ',' i) '' (' · r.:: , I !1 ~ -,};_:)i_i -__ ,, __ -------- Forest Contracting March 11, 2015 SCOPE OF WORK Our geotechnical evaluation included review of geologic mapping, site explorations, engineering analyses and evaluations and the preparation of this report. The scope of work included the following specific tasks: o Review of published geologic mapping and USDA soil mapping of the site vicinity. o Performed a reconnaissance of the site. o Observed and logged four test pit explorations on the site (see Figure 2) to depths up to 6 feet below existing ground. Logs of the test pits and results of field and laboratory testing are presented in the Test Pit summaries of Appendix A. o Performed geotechnical engineering evaluations of infiltration feasibility and the proposed site development and developed our geotechnical recommendations for infiltration foundation design and site grading. o Prepared this geotechnical report summarizing our findings and recommendations. OBSERVED SITE CONDITIONS The property is bordered on the north and east by developed residential lots (and 9th Street NE) on the south by an existing play field and on the west by undeveloped land. At the time of our field exploration the property was un-developed as shown in Figure 2. The topographic mapping included on the site plan of Figure 2 indicates that the proposed new lots area generally slopes gently to very gently down to the west/southwest at gradients that range from only about 3 to 17 percent and the remainder of the property (approximately the western ?l:l) is near flat The site was well vegetated with primarily alder trees with occasional evergreen trees and understory that included grasses, salal, and blackberries. We did not observe any seeps or springs or evidence of current or past erosion on the site. We did however observe standing water within the area of the mapped wetland (Tract A). Project No. 15-107-01 Page 2 Forest Contracting March 11, 2015 Subsoils Our evaluation of the subsurface conditions was based on our observations of three exploratory test pits within the proposed eastern new lot area plus a fourth test pit within Tract B as well as review of published geologic mapping and USDA soil mapping. Approximate locations of the test pits are shown on Figure 2. Logs of the test pits are presented in Appendix A. Subsoils encountered in our test pits were found to include some minor fill and natural glacially consolidated soils. Fill soils were encountered in TP-3 located at the northwest quadrant of Lot 1. Fill soils were silty very fine sand with occasional gravel and were only about 3 feet thick at that location. Natural soils encountered at the test pit locations were generally silty fine to very fine sand with occasional gravel. At TP-2 we encountered a strata of sandy silt soils at a depth of about 2.5 feet which extended down to the hard cemented soils. The upper soils were typically loose to depths of about 2 to 3 feet below the natural surface becoming medium dense, dense and very dense to hard and cemented at depths of about 3 to 4 feet below the natural surface. Ground Water No ground water or seepage was observed in any of the test pits on the proposed Lots 1 and 2, but red-brown mottling was observed in TP-1 on Lot 2 at depths of 3 to 4 feet and ground water seepage was observed at a depth of about 2.5 feet in TP-4 within Tract B. Typically the shallow soils were classified as moist to very moist and the deeper cemented soils were classified as moist. The measured moisture contents of the soils generally ranged from about 13 to 22 percent within the upper soils. Subsurface Variations Based on our experience, it is our opinion that some variation in the continuity and depth of subsoil deposits and ground water levels should be anticipated due to natural deposition variations and previous onsite structures and grading. Due to seasonal moisture changes, ground water conditions should be expected to change with time. Care should be exercised when interpolating or extrapolating subsurface soils and ground water conditions between or beyond our test pits. Project No. 15-107-01 Page 3 Forest Contracting March 11, 2015 SITE EVALUATIONS General The referenced geologic map of Figure 1 indicates the site vicinity to have surface exposures of glacial till (Qgt) soils. The Qgt glacial till soils are highly consolidated, heterogeneous mixtures of sand, silt, clay and gravel soils deposited during the advance of the Vashon glaciation, the last glacial advance into the Puget Sound area, approximately 13,000 to 16,000 years ago. Based on the soils observed on the site and review of the referenced map, it is our opinion that the natural soils underlying the property and are glacially consolidated till deposits (Qgt). Based on the results of our field investigations combined with our own experience and judgment, it is our opinion that the geotechnical site conditions are suitable for the proposed development provided our recommendations are followed. Hazard Assessment Landslide: The Renton Sensitive Areas Maps indicate the site is not within a Landslide Hazard area. In addition, the geologic map of Figure 1 indicates no mapped landslides within the site vicinity and our site observations indicate the site is currently stable. Considering the gentle to very gentle slope gradients and the observed glacial till soils, it is our opinion that the potential for future instability on the site is very low to nil. Erosion: The Renton Sensitive Areas Maps indicate the site is not within a Erosion Hazard area. We observed that the site is well vegetated we observed no indication of any seepage or concentrated water flow or current or past erosion on the site. Based on our site observations and explorations it is our opinion that there is no unusual erosion risk at this site and any potential erosion potential resulting from development will be mitigated by our recommended grading procedures and drainage/erosion control measures and by final re-vegetation/landscaping incorporated into the proposed development plans. Coal Mine: The Renton Sensitive Areas Maps indicate the site is not within a Coal Mine Hazard area. Seismic: The Puget Sound region is a seismically active area. About 17+ moderate to large earthquakes (M5 to M7+) have occurred in the Puget Sound and northwestern Cascades region since 1872 (143 years) including the 2/28/01 M6.8 Nisqually earthquake and it is our opinion that the proposed structures will very likely experience significant ground shaking during their useful life. Project No. 15-107-01 Page 4 Forest Contracting March 11, 2015 Based on a recently published study the site lies only about 2 miles south of the southern mapped location of the Seattle fault and about 19 miles southwest of the estimated trace of the South Whidbey-Lake Alice fault both of which have postulated maximum credible magnitudes of 7.0 to 7.5. Another recent study of the Vashon- Tacoma area presents evidence for the east-west trending Tacoma Fault which is indicated to pass through the south end of Vashon and the middle of Maury Island about 11 miles southwest of the site. The study suggests that the Tacoma Fault and the Seattle fault may be linked by a master thrust fault at depth. The Seattle fault has been documented to have moved at its west end (Bainbridge Island) about 1000 to 1100 years ago and evidence of movement at the east end has also recently been documented. Some experts feel that the recurrence interval between large events on the Seattle Fault may be on the order of several thousands of years but our calculations indicate it may be on the order of 1200 to 1400 years. The activity of the documented Tacoma fault is considered to be on the same order as the Seattle fault. The recurrence of a maximum credible event on the South Whidbey fault is not known but some experts have assigned a recurrence of about 3000 years, however smaller events will occur more frequently as evidenced by the 5.3 event on May 2, 1996 which was attributed to that fault. In addition to Puget Sound seismic sources, a great earthquake event (M8 to M9+) has been postulated for the Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ) along the northwest Pacific coast of Oregon, Washington and Canada. The current risk of a future CSZ event is not known at this time. Published reports have indicated recurrence intervals for a CSZ event to range from as little as 100-200 years to as long as 1000+ years and the time of the last event is reported to have been about 315 years ago. Considering all of the above, it is our opinion that the proposed structures will very likely experience significant ground shaking during their useful life. The 2012 International Building Code (!BC) adopted by the City of Renton requires that a Maximum Considered Earthquake Geometric Mean (MCE 8 ) ground motion peak horizontal ground acceleration (PGA) be used for site liquefaction evaluations but that the !BC Design Earthquake which is defined as 2/3 of the MCEG ground motions may be used for consideration in other geotechnical seismic site evaluations for new construction. The MCEG PGA of the 2012 !BC is based on consideration of both probabilistic ground motions with a 2475-year recurrence interval and deterministic ground motions based on a model of known fault locations and characteristics adjusted for site specific soil conditions. Per section 1803.5.12(2) of the 2012 !BC, we have estimated the MCE 8 PGA for this site to be about 0.57g in accordance with Section 11.8.3 of ASCE 7-10. We estimate the !BC Design Earthquake ground motion PGA for this site to be 0.38g. Please note that the Design Earthquake ground motion PGA is not intended for structural analyses. Spectral accelerations per the 2012 !BC should be considered in structural design. This site is considered to be a Site Class D per the IBC definitions. Project No. 15-107-01 Page 5 Forest Contracting March 11, 2015 Secondary seismic hazards due to earthquake ground shaking include induced slope failure, liquefaction, lateral spreading and ground settlement. Considering the very dense/hard nature of the soils recommended for bearing at the site, it is our evaluation that the potential for damage to the structures due to liquefaction, lateral spreading and settlement is very low to nil. The potential for seismically induced shallow failures is also considered very low to nil. Storm Water Infiltration Feasibility Feasibility of storm water infiltration was evaluated in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) Appendix C -Small Project Drainage Requirements criteria. Section C.2.2.2, 1 a) of KCSWDM Appendix C states that the infiltration soils "cannot be comprised of fill materials" and Section C.2.2.2, 1 b) of KCSWDM Appendix C states that the depth to "the maximum wet season water table or hardpan must be at least 3 feef' Section C.2.2.2 requires the natural soils for Full Infiltration must be clean "coarse sands or cobbles or medium sands" however Section C.2.3.2 allows Limited Infiltration into "fine sands, loamy sands, sandy loams or loams". Natural permeable soils encountered at the test pit locations were generally classified as silty fine to very fine sand with occasional gravel and were underlain by very dense to hard and cemented impermeable glacial till soils at depths of 3 to 4 feet below the natural surface. At TP-2 we encountered a sandy silt strata at a depth of about 2.5 feet which extended down to the hard cemented soils. The upper soils were typically loose to depths of about 2 to 3 feet below the natural surface becoming medium dense to dense. At TP-4 within Tract B we encountered ground water at a depth of 2.5 feet. Review of USDA soil survey mapping of the site vicinity indicates the site to expose Alderwood gravelly sandy loam soils (AgC). The Alderwood soils are described as gravelly sandy loam to 7 inches and very gravelly sandy loam from 7 to 59 inches with ground water or restrictive layer at 20 to 39 inches. Considering the above criteria and the fact that no clean coarse sands, cobbles or medium sands were encountered at any of the test pits, in our opinion the general site is not suitable for Full Infiltration per the criteria of KCSWDM Appendix C. However we observed 3 to 4 feet of permeable natural silty fine to very fine sand soils above the impermeable hard cemented soils at all of the test pit locations on the proposed new Lots 1 and 2 and in our opinion Limited Infiltration is feasible on Lots 1 and 2 per the criteria of KCSWDM Appendix C. Three feet of fill was encountered at TP-3 on Lot 1 but we observed 3 feet of natural permeable soils beneath the fill and overlying the hard cemented soils at TP-3, therefore that location also meets the minimum criteria for Limited Infiltration provided that infiltration systems are placed within the natural soils. Considering that ground water was encountered at a depth of only 2.5 feet at TP-4 in Tract B. it is our opinion that the subsoil conditions at Tract B do not meet the above Project No. 15-107-01 Page 6 Forest Contracting March 11, 2015 referenced requirements of KCSWDM Appendix C for storm water infiltration and is therefore infiltration on Tract B is not considered feasible. All infiltration systems should be constructed at least 1 foot above the surface of the impervious hard cemented soil layers encountered in our explorations per the requirements of Section C.2.2.2 of the 2009 KCSWM. If there is inadequate available space on the site for limited infiltration of all onsite storm water runoff, dispersion BMP methods may be used per Sections C.2.1 and C.2.4 of the 2009 KCSWM with the exception that we do not recommend the use of splash blocks (C.2.4.2). In addition we recommend that rock pads (C.2.4.3) and gravel filled dispersion trenches should be located at least 15 feet in the downslope direction away from the structure. Final grades around the structure should be sloped to drain away from the structure and dispersion trenches should be placed so that the dispersed storm flow will not be directed towards the structure or other neighboring structures. Structure Support Considerations In our opinion the undisturbed very dense/hard natural glacial till soils encountered in our explorations should provide good support for the proposed structure foundations. Bearing soils are expected to be encountered at depths ranging from about 2 to 3.5 feet below the natural ground surface at the site. Foundations should penetrate through any existing fill, topsoil and loose/medium dense soils to bear on undisturbed very dense/hard natural soils. Conventional spread footings are considered appropriate for support of the proposed structures considering that bearing soils are at shallow depths. However, if any deep fill areas are encountered on the site, lean concrete footing extensions or pipe piles could be used to transfer foundation loads to the deep bearing soils in those areas. We have included recommendations for spread footings and pipe piles in this report. RECOMMENDATIONS The following subsections present our recommendations for design of foundations, retaining walls, site grading, drainage control and erosion control. Also included are recommendations for plan review and observations and testing during construction. Spread Footing Foundations Conventional spread footings founded on undisturbed very dense/hard natural glacial till soils should provide good support for the proposed structures. Bearing soils are expected to be encountered at depths ranging from about 3 to 4 feet below the natural ground surface of the site (below any fill soils on the site). Project No. 15-107-01 Page 7 Forest Contracting March 11, 2015 Continuous wall footings should be at least 18 inches wide. Square footings for column support should be at least 24 inches wide. Footings supported on undisturbed very dense/hard natural glacial till soils may be designed based on an allowable bearing pressure of 2000 psf. All footings should be founded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade. Where the natural bearing soils slope, the footing excavation should be stepped to maintain a horizontal bearing surface. If deep fill or other unsuitable soils are encountered, foundation loads may be transferred from the recommended minimum foundation depths to the recommended very dense/hard bearing soils by a monolith of lean concrete having a minimum compressive strength of 1000 psi. The width of an un-reinforced lean concrete monolith should be at least as wide as the footing or at least one-third of the monolith height, whichever is greater. Reinforced monoliths should be designed by a structural engineer. A suitable width trench should be excavated with a smooth edged excavator bucket (no teeth) to expose the dense/very dense bearing soils under observation by our office and backfilled as soon as possible with the lean concrete to the footing elevation. The estimated settlement of a properly constructed 18-inch wide continuous footing carrying a load of 3 kips per foot is on the order of 1 /4 to 1 /2 inch. Our settlement estimates assume that foundations are supported on undisturbed very dense/hard natural bearing soils and that all fill and loose/disturbed material is removed from the bearing surface prior to concrete pour. Maximum differential settlement within the proposed structures is expected to be 1/2 inch or less. Settlements are expected to occur primarily during construction. Resistance to lateral loads can be assumed to be provided by friction acting at the base of foundations and by passive earth pressure. A coefficient of friction of 0.45 may be assumed with the dead load forces in contact with on-site soils. An allowable static passive earth pressure of 250 psf per foot of depth may be used for the sides of footings poured against undisturbed medium dense natural soils or properly compacted slr udur al fill. An allowable static passive earth pressure of ·150 psf per foot of depth may be used for the sides of footings or grade beams poured against existing loose soils. The vertical and lateral bearing values indicated above are for the total dead load plus frequently applied live loads. For short duration dynamic loading caused by seismic or wind forces, the vertical bearing values may be increased by 50 percent and allowable lateral passive pressures may be increased by 33 percent. Project No. 15-107-01 Page 8 Forest Contracting March 11, 2015 Retaining Walls Cantilevered retaining walls as referred to in this report are walls which yield or move outward during and after backfilling. Actual wall movements will depend on the wall design and method of backfilling and can range from 0.1 % to 0_3% of the wall height. Design pressures for cantilevered walls given below assume that the top of the wall will deflect at least 0.15% of the wall height. Design of wall foundations should be in accordance with the recommendations presented in this report. Static design of permanent cantilevered retaining walls which support a horizontal surface of properly compacted clean free-draining granular material may be based on an equivalent fluid density of 40 pcf. These pressures assume that there is no water pressure with the wall backfill. An additional uniform lateral pressure due to backfill surcharge should be computed using a coefficient of 0.27 times the uniform vertical surcharge load. Static design of walls supporting horizontal backfill and structurally braced against movement should be based on an equivalent fluid density of 60 pcf. This pressure assumes that the wall supports a horizontal backfill of properly compacted free-draining granular material and that there is no water pressure behind the wall. Uniform lateral pressure due to a uniform vertical surcharge behind a braced wall should be computed using a coefficient of 0.43 times the uniform vertical surcharge load. Seismic design of retaining walls should include a dynamic soil loading. Dynamic soil pressure should be assumed to have an inverted triangular distribution. Based on a 0.38g IBC ground motion level the dynamic soil pressure at the top of the wall should be at least 25H (psf) where H is the height of the wall above the footing base. The dynamic soil pressure should diminish linearly to zero at the base of the wall. Combined static plus dynamic soil pressure should be used for seismic design of the walls. Care should be exercised in compacting backfill against retaining walls. Heavy equipment should not approach retaining walls close enough to intrude within a 1: 1 line drawn upward from the bottom of the wall. Backfill close to walls should be placed and compacted with hand-operated equipment. Recommendations for placement and compaction of structural fill are presented under "Site Grading". Design wall pressures given above assume no water pressure behind the wall. We recommend that a drainage zone be provided behind all walls and a adequate drain system be provided at the base of the walls. Wall drains should consist of a four-inch diameter perforated PVC drain pipe placed in at least one cubic foot of drain gravel per lineal foot along the base of the wall. Drain gravel should be washed material with particle sizes in the range of 3/4 to 1 -1 /2 inches. As a minimum, the drainage zone within the upper wall should consist of a Miradrain drainage mat or equivalent attached to the wall surface for the full height and Project No. 15-107-01 Page 9 Forest Contracting March 11. 2015 embedded into the drain gravel at the base of the wall. As an alternative a sand drainage zone could be placed the full height of the wall with a horizontal width equal to at least 1 foot. Backfill within the drainage zone should be a clean sand/gravel mixture with less than 5 percent fines based on the sand fraction. A membrane of Mirafi 140 filter fabric or equivalent should be provided between the drainage zone material and onsite silty soil backfill. The drainage zone backfill should be capped with 12 inches of silty soils to reduce surface water infiltration. Site Grading Site grading is expected to consist primarily of excavation for proposed foundations and subgrade preparation for slab and pavement areas and utility trenches. Onsite granular soils cleaned of debris and organics are considered suitable for use in general compacted fills but in our experience the onsite glacial till soils will be moisture sensitive with regard to grading and compaction characteristics. Grading should be scheduled for the late summer months if possible. Wet weather grading may require the use of imported clean granular fill soils which are more easily compacted at higher moisture levels. Recommendations for site preparation, temporary excavations, structural fill, subgrade preparation, site drainage and trench backfill are presented below. Site Preparation: Existing vegetation, debris, fill soils, and loose or organic natural soils should be stripped from the areas that are to be graded. During rough grading, excess soils may be stockpiled for later use. Stripping in subgrade areas is expected to average about 1 foot. Soils containing more than 1 % by weight of organics may be used in planter areas, but should not be used for structural fill. Stumps, debris and trash, plus rocks and rubble over 6 inches in size, should be removed from the site. Subsoil conditions on the site may vary from those encountered in our test pits. Therefore, our office should observe the prepared areas prior to placement of any new fills. Temporary Excavations: Sloped temporary construction excavations may be used where planned excavation limits will not undermine existing structures or interfere with other construction. Where there is not enough room for sloped excavations, shoring should be provided. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered in the test pits, it is our opinion that sloped temporary excavations may be made vertically to depths of 4 feet or less. Excavations up to 10 feet in depth should be sloped no steeper than 1: 1 within loose/medium dense soils and no steeper than %: 1 (horizontal:vertical) within the un- weathered, hard natural glacial till soils. It should be noted that the contractor is responsible for safety and maintenance of construction slopes. We recommend that cuts over 4 feet in depth be covered with visqueen tarp to help control ravelling and sloughing. Surface drainage should be directed away from the top Project No. 15-107-01 Page 10 Forest Contracting March 11. 2015 edge of cut slopes. Surcharge loads should not be allowed within 5 feet of the top of the slope or within a 1:1 (horizontal:vertical) plane extending up from the toe of excavation. whichever is greater. Structural Fill: Provided that soil moisture can be reduced and maintained near optimum, excavated onsite soils cleaned of organics and debris may be used for general structural fill but the onsite soils are expected to be moisture sensitive and during the rainy season the soils may become too wet for practical compaction. Therefore imported granular fill soils should be used if moisture conditions cannot be adequately controlled. Loose soils, formwork and debris should be removed prior to placing fill or backfill. Structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness and compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the ASTM 01557 test method. Imported granular fill should consist of clean, well-graded sand and gravel materials free of organic debris and other deleterious material. Imported material for wet weather grading should be a sand/gravel mixture with less than 5 percent fines based on the sand fraction. Slab/Pavement Support: Slabs-on-grade and pavement should be supported directly on undisturbed dense natural soils or on properly compacted structural fill over dense natural soils. Where unsuitable soils (existing fill, loose and organic soils) exist at subgrade level, subgrade preparation should include excavation of the unsuitable soils as required to expose medium dense natural soils or to a maximum depth of 2 feet (or deeper as required to remove all organic soils where organic soil depths exceed 2 feet below final subgrade) and placement of structural fill to final subgrade elevation. Subgrade fill should be placed in accordance with the recommendations for structural fill except that the top 6 inches of the subgrade fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the ASTM 01557 maximum dry density in pavement and driveway areas. It should be noted that where the proposed slabs cross a fill/natural contact line, there will be a high risk of cracking. Risk of cracking can be reduced by placing construction joints at the contact and by proper steel reinforcement of the slab. Interior concrete slabs should be underlain by a capillary break consisting of a polyethylene vapor barrier of at least 6 mil thickness. Utility Trenches: Buried utility conduits should be bedded and backfilled around the conduit in accordance with the project specifications. Bedding material should extend from six inches below the pipe to six inches above the pipe. Where conduit underlies pavement or slabs-on-grade, the remaining backfill above the pipe should be placed and compacted in accordance with the recommendations for structural fill. If imported granular fill is used for trench backfill it should be capped with 12 inches of onsite silty soils. Project No. 15-107-01 Page 11 Forest Contracting March 11. 2015 Drainage Control Surface drainage from the site and adjoining upslope areas should be controlled and diverted around the development area in a non-erosive manner. Adequate positive drainage should be provided away from the structures and on the site in general to prevent water from ponding and to reduce percolation of water into subsoils. Granular backfill should be capped with paving or 6 inches of onsite silty soils. A desirable slope for surface drainage is 2% in landscaped areas and 1 % in paved areas. Roof drains should be tightlined into the storm drain system (no discharge on the ground surface) by a separate and independent drain pipe (no connection to any other drain pipes). A permanent perimeter drain, independent of the roof drain system, should be placed adjacent to the base of the continuous exterior foundations. The drain should consist of a four-inch diameter perforated PVC drain pipe placed in at least one cubic foot of washed drain gravel per lineal foot along the base of the foundations. The drain gravel zone around the pipe should be encapsulated with a membrane of Mirafi 140 filter fabric or equivalent between the drainage zone and on site silty soils. Erosion Control Although we observed no evidence of erosion, onsite soils are expected to be erodible when disturbed and exposed to concentrated water flows. Siltation fences or other detention devices should be provided around the downslope side of the disturbed site area and soil stockpile areas during construction to control the transport of eroded material. The lower edge of the silt fence fabric should have "J" shaped embedment in a trench extending at least 12 inches below the ground surface. Surface water flow should be collected in area drains and tightlined to the storm water system, no water should be discharged on the site unless via a properly designed and approved infiltration/dispersion system. Exposed final graded soil areas should be planted immediately with grass and deep rooted plants. Plan Review This report has been prepared to aid in the evaluation of this site and to assist the architect, structural and civil engineers in the design and construction of the project. It is recommended that this office be provided the opportunity to review the final design drawings and specifications to determine if the recommendations of this report have been properly implemented and to make any supplemental design recommendations which may be required. Project No. 15-107-01 Page 12 Forest Contracting March 11, 2015 Observations and Testing During Construction Recommendations presented in this report are based on the assumption that soil conditions exposed during construction will be observed by our office so that any necessary design changes or supplements may be made. Foundation excavations should be observed to verify that they expose undisturbed very dense/hard bearing soils and that excavations are free of loose and disturbed materials. All structural fill and slab/pavement subgrade areas should be observed by a representative of this office after stripping and prior to placing fill. Drainage control systems should be observed by our office to verify proper construction. Proper fill placement and compaction should be verified with field and laboratory density testing by a qualified testing laboratory. CLOSURE This report was prepared for specific application to the subject site and for the exclusive use of Forest Contracting and their representatives. The findings and conclusions of this report were prepared with the skill and care ordinarily exercised by local members of the geotechnical profession practicing under similar conditions in the same locality. We make no other warranty, either express or implied. Variations may exist in site conditions between those described in this report and actual conditions encountered during construction. Unanticipated subsurface conditions commonly occur and cannot be prevented by merely making explorations and performing reconnaissance. Such unexpected conditions frequently require additional expenditures to achieve a properly constructed project. If conditions encountered during construction appear to be different from those indicated in this report, our office should be notified. Respectfully submitted, GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC. James A. Doolittle Principal Engineer Encl: Figures 1 and 2 Appendix A Dist: 1/Addressee via email electronic copy 2/Encompass Engineering & Surveying Project No. 15-107-01 Page 13 ref: Geologic Map of the Renton Q.Iadrangle by D.R. Mullineaux, USGS Map GQ-405, 1965 Scale: 1 "~2000 ' Goof"echnfcol Engln,eertng and Earth Science$ SITE VICINITY GEOLOGIC MAP Proposed Campbell Short Plat KCPN 1023059095, 4400 Block NE 9th St Renton, Washington Proj. No.15-107 Date 3/15 Figure 1 ! ~ () ii1 ~ 8 ~ l:: ~ C: <ii • ~ f) ~ ~Q3 .Q_ 8" z '8 z ::, ~[ a , o ~ ... tj en u, fiT oi H I Ulu, "3 ...... ;:::r' \.0 t,lj 0 J-l•O -.-J :;, \D tr t'l cQ lJl (D >< 0 rt ... ~ -0 ,-, ·v e?. ::s ,+:,, t:-t CD ..i:::,.U) 0 w I 8 5 ~ -----. to~ "3 ~ ,-, H U1 Q'd 0 !+ ii;' z rt 'd l} I : ~ !; g: <1> "' ;!? I IL ~11 !! (Ao~"usi-' SSw, HIY TO NEW a'<Ar.F) (01 11 iil5/-E~J L')l lC i1 I i flGUND 2' BRASS c1s::' l',JTH ~x· 20' CUASCUT ; / DF11\t£WAV ENlFlANCE I ·~ ,.._,;:, :,., 41Ki ~':/ ll:. tASEI.IP,H_ 40.!IJ!:186 --"£t.."E -.• ~.., -~ ~L_ L ~ W(l".:)0 lt4 CCPsCRfl~. IN CASE •'-."6"N .u.:_~i&..._CUL \.ERO ---:::...:'.'._ ---_ 1 -.. ~ L:)~ q O-~ . .\i.CUl.AED t.ORTH - 4C5 4 II'° -------------=t--I _IN£ OF PROPER/'< CON~TRUcr KEW D-5' ~RncJ .' CURB/GUTll:lt. B' FLANl"ER -t- i_ • ".1 ~ x~ ' ----____ -_ --------~-+--=--;;~~~:--~~~; ;1 ~ /.'.:-----,...,.....,..'.''"' -------,---- SOl"O:T.U"E: ; W'2~'j8"f J ~~-- ~TRIP & 5' SID_E:WA~ __ TRACT B ~•-STORMWATE '"I.:(~ g 7~' -R/UTIUTY BMP Fa:c R} ' ~ SQ. FT lMPROVC:MEN~,...,.C'[>"-,~,--~-- > '• s;,-,··>1.: • o" <"o ,...._ I 1 •>" I .,,., ,.,. ..... p,"'-," "'-,'l.•-l• -~- J ' ... ,,. . _, .. , .,.~ -.. -., ' ' • • •• ---0---•. ' ~·i\,-,,; ,o·.~'ii:"0 '•· • I:' 50' ~ -~· , • / ,· ·' ..-,u,No ~'• l> P-\ I ·' ·-·· '--! -<'" . . . ' .. , • • . ><'Y--•• ' . ,,, ' ~~. "'°T -' ' ' ' ~ :c;!'...X ',\~"" --~,-,g /-\ / ·1)"c-e \ \ '·\ 20· Aset': .._,') sc.,o~ ~<, , I -\ DRM" ' ' '" 7;1:\ \ I I y \ . ' \ . \ -·· ·'\, ----------><•F '2 \ \ · · 0 \\ \ s,,,0 , I I "1 / I I I .J.../ ' I '/ -ANGlC POI OF WEST P, 'le------t ~~c \ ' I Lot B ,.,-~\au~)--\ \ ,., ., OTECTION . " ,( , \ '-''' - ASEM NF-07)( ,', ,F s I \' ENT ·:...s-\ , I ,s ,c,cs / "'... '-, c -------I '--"'~ ---''"•· I ~ \\ 12 \ , , ---, • . I . , ----_ \.~-::::-------------"' ,y i 1 \ I i'! ~- ~ lli J ~ , ,;'.L,1~~ /__.,...----.... x ' ,,'-~' \;i,; \ \ a. • --:----·--•'._ • ',}. \ I "I,' so 1n I\ -T\ / I o ~\ I I I \ = ..:::;· ' \ -7 --I J,."' \ \ ' \ \_ • ""-._ 7 CY 5!\..69"'-~ ' '" >X ~ ~ 1;--~- -J C1..Ct11< , 7 • ~ -o ~ --o, FENCE ~ IJTIL_ 'lY =-A" " P 1 a -·---• ~'° ,_,,' -··- ur· ADS CUL"vl:in +oJ.82 IE ' " " sn,, rull ,oc,;2,ons ~ ~ . R,M»<l·:)S .._. E VACATD __ ,._,,. ,.. ' - ACSN 403.7/lf , ••,n 1,T~cr-\, 'llt:l".,'J\, ---N(R'lH1'EST ----BY ~lD~RD£UNE ... Tl0N--------..._ ---~ ref; Pacific Peak Short Plat Site Plan, elated 2/9/15, prepared by Fncanpass Engineering .~ Surveying, reduced scale: 1 "= 50' ~ .. r r~ r~ I LOI lC 211' ACCEO,'.:i./Lll EAC>EMENI " ,'OlJND 1/ Sf!'.1.4P[O 0 j ··.~ L0"7 13 / --fOJND 1/:.. STAMPE[: 'I . 0.:Q.'1_ 6' WOOD FENCE , ... ,,,o ..~ Forest Contracting March 11, 2015 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION Our field exploration included a site reconnaissance and test pit explorations. During the site reconnaissance, the surface site conditions were noted, and the locations of the test pits were approximately determined. The test pits were approximately located using existing property boundaries as a guide. The approximate locations of the test pits are shown on Figure 2. Test Pit elevations were estimated based on the topographic mapping shown on Figure 2. Test pits were advanced using a trackhoe excavator. Soils were continuously logged and classified in the field by visual examination, in accordance with the ASTM Soil Classification system. Logs of the test pits are presented on the test pit summary sheets A-1 and A-2. The test pit summaries include descriptions of the soils and pertinent field data. Soil consistency and moisture conditions indicated on the logs are interpretations based on the conditions observed in the field. Boundaries between soil strata indicated on the logs are approximate and actual transitions between strata may be gradual. ProjectNo.15-107-01 Page 14 TEST PIT NO. 1 Logged by JAD Date: 3/6/15 Depth Blows Class. Soil Description 0 OL Duff w:torganics 1 SM Silty fine Sand w/occ gravel to 2" & roots to 2" diameter 2 J 3 with weak cemetation 4 becomes very cemented 5 Maximum depth 5 feet. 6 No ground water observed. 7 Consistency Moisture Color loose medium ense dense .. g!m~ moist to very morst moist dark brn brown gray & red-brn qrav-orown Elevation: 409' W(%) Comments 17.5 15.1 difficult drggmg TEST PIT NO. 2 Logged by JAD Date: 3/6/ 15 Depth Blows Class. Soil Description Consistency Elevation: 416' Moisture Color W(%) Comments loose moist . dark brn 0 ,--..,...,,--....,...,,.,,,....-...-------,-,----,----,-,--.--,......,..-,--..,...--,----1 ()L . Cluff & organics SM Silty very fine Sand w/gravel to 2" & roots to 1" 2 soft to firm 3 ML Sandy Silt very fine 4 cemented hard to ve~ mo, t vei;x most moist bgiwn red-brn gray 13.3 22.2 difficult drggrng 5--1---+---+------------+----+----+----4---.-----1 Maximum depth 5 ft. 6 No ground water observed. 7 GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineering and Earth Sciences Proposed Campbell Short Plat KCPN 1023059095, 4400 Block NE 9th St Renton, Washington Proj. No.15-107 Date 3/15 Figure A-1 TEST PIT NO. 3 Logged by JAD Date: 3/6/15 Elevation: 412' Depth Blows Class. Soil Description Consistency Moisture Color W(%) Comments 0 OL Duff w/organics loose moist dark brn FILL SM Silty very fr,!e Sand I ., to brown w occ grave to 2 very & & abundant roots moist 16.6 gark-2 rown & black 3 Silty fine Sand li~ht SM w/occ gravel to 2" b own 4 15.3 5 m.dense 6 dense cemented hard moist grgtn 13.1 gifficult I In 7 Maximum depth 6.5 feet. No ground water observed. TEST PIT NO. 4 Logged by JAD Date: 3/6/15 Depth Blows Class. Soil Description Consistem;:y Moisture Elevation: 406' Color W(%) Comments . Duff ~ organi~s .. loose moist clark ~m O -,..-....,..O--L_,........,...,.---,-----------,.----.-----------1 Silty fine-fcoarse Sa~d ,, to b~wn w occ. grave to 4 & abundant roots to 1-Y," ve\X red-brn mo1 t SM 2 · rn.dense 20.4 ve~ dense most wet gray ~f2P?~iet 3 cemented hard moist gitticult 12.0 1gging 4-l---+---+------------.J----+-----+----l---+-----11 5 6 7 Maximum depth 4 ft. Ground water seepage at 2.5 feet. GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineering and Earth Sciences Proposed Campbell Short Plat KCPN 1023059095, 4400 Block NE 9th St Renton, Washington Proj. No. 15-107 Date 3/15 Figure A-2 Altmann Oliver Associates, I.LC I'{ I ;, ·~ -, :-.,, January 29, 2015 Peter St. Pierre Pacific Peak Construction Services peter@pacificpeakcs.com I Erl\ ininrncntal Pl.lnning & I ' I .<11>dsc,qw . \rd1itt·CltllT I AOA-3860 SUBJECT: Wetland Reconnaissance for Mackenzie Lane Short Plat; Renton, WA (Parcel 102305-9095) Dear Peter: On January 28, 2015 I conducted a wetland reconnaissance throughout the eastern portion of the subject property utilizing the methodology outlined in the May 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0). The primary purpose of the reconnaissance was to confirm that the wetland boundary and classification as delineated by AlderNW in 2008 remained valid. AlderNW delineated one Category 2 wetland (Wetland A) throughout the central and southwestern portion of the site. The wetland boundaries were subsequently surveyed (see survey drawing) and the delineation was documented in an August 26, 2008 report (Attachment A). Based on the recent site review, the surveyed wetland boundary appears to remain accurate and a re-delineation does not appear warranted. In addition, the classification of the wetland as a Category 2 wetland has also not changed. Category 2 wetlands in the City of Renton currently require a standard 50-foot buffer. Proposed Project It is my understanding that the proposed project has been reduced from a 4-lot short plat to a 2-lot short plat and that previously proposed buffer averaging is no longer a component of the project. The 50-foot buffer in the eastern portion of the site adjacent the proposed development currently consists of a native mixed forest and no planting is required. Peter St. Pierre January 29, 2015 Page2 If you have any questions regarding the reconnaissance, please give me a call. Sincerely, ALTMANN OLIVER ASSOCIATES, LLC John Altmann Ecologist Attachment Mr. Steve Beck Arnberwood LLC 19129 SE 145th Street Renton, Washington 98056 Subject: Dear Mr. Beck: Wetland Evaluation/Buffer Averaging Plan Mackenzie Lane SW corner ofNE 9t11 Street and Anacortes Avenue NE Renton, Washington Parcel# I 023059095 Alder1'.'"W December 16, 2008 Project No. 20108 As requested, we have conducted a wetland evaluation for the property located on the southwest corner of the intersection ofNE 9th Street and Anacortes Avenue NE, in the City of Renton. The location of the subject parcel is shown on the attached Vicinity Map (Figure 1). The purpose of our work was to identify the limits of the wetland area on and immediately adjacent to the subject property. In conducting our site wetland evaluation, we followed the general procedures for the routine on-site methodology as outlined in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (/1,farch 1997). This procedure involves analysis of vegetation patterns, soil conditions, and near-surface hydrology in making a determination of wetland conditions. Our scope of work included a site visit on February 6, 2008, at wh.ich time we completed our site valuation and flagged the limits of the site wetland. The flagged wetland points have been surveyed and plotted on project maps as shown on project design plans by Baima and Holmberg, and on the Site Map (Figure 2). We revisited the site in August, 2008, in preparing th.is report. WETLAND EVALUATION PROCEDD"RES For the purpose of this study, we used the wetland definition adopted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers (COE) for administering Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. According to this definition, wetlands are: ~Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas.~ (33 CFR 323) In Washington State, the Shoreline Management Act and Growth Management Act have amended this definition to exclude some wetland situations by adding the following sentences to the wetland definition: 812 NE 83'd Street, Seattle, Washington 98115 • Phone (206)334-1338 email aldernw@comcast.net iv1r. Steve Beck December 16, 2008 Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non-wetland sites, including but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July !, 1990, that were intentiooally created as a result of the construction of a road, street or Highway. Wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non- wetland areas to mitigate the conversion of wetlands. Delineation procedures are based on diagnostic environmental indicators of wetland vegetation, wetland soils, and wetland hydrology. These procedures, outlined in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation 1Hanual (March 1997) are commonly known as a Triple Parameter Method. By definition, an area is designated as wetland when there are positive indicators for all three parameters. A listing of plant species lias been developed for use in the methodology for delineating wetland areas. This listing assigns plant species to one of five indicator status categories ranging from Obligate wetland species, which almost always occur in wetlands, to Upland species, which rarely occur in wetlands. Under normal conditions, liydropbytic vegetation is determined to be present if more than 50 percent of the dominant species are in the Obligate (OBL), Facultative Wetland (F ACW), or Facultative (F AC) indicator categories. Dia,,onostic indicators of liydric soils are related to soil saturation, wliich leads to anaerobic conditions in the soil. Under t'iese conditions, decomposition of organic material is· inhibited and soil minerals are · reduced, creating characteristic soil colors that can be quantified by comparison with Munsell Soil Color Charts. A chroma of one or less in unmott[ed soils or a chroma of two or less in mottled soils generally indicates a liydric soil. fu addition, soils that are saturated during the growing season satisfy a criterion for hydric soils. We used a hand auger and or shovel to collect soil samp [es from depths of 8 to I 8 inches, or below the A horizon. Wetland hydrology is defined as inundated or saturated soil conditions for at least 14 coosecutive days during the growing season. If no water is present at tile time of evaluation, other indicators may include topographic low points or channels, flood debris, complete absence of vegetation, or presence ofhydric soils. GENERAL SITE CONDffiONS The subject property is a rectangular shaped parcel of approximately l .2acres. It is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of NE 9th Street and Anacortes Avenue NE in the City of Renton. The location of tile property is illustrated on the Vicinity Map (Figure 1 ). Adjacent properties immediately to the north and to the east are occupied by existing residential subdivisions. The property to the soutli is occupied by a grassed athletic playfie[d owned by the City of Rentoo. There is an irregularly shaped stormwater treatment facility adjacent to the west property line on property owned by Reoton Church of the Nazarene. The property represents an isolated undeveloped small patch within surrounding urban development. Soils across the property and on mucli of the surrounding area are mapped as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (Soil Sw,,ey of King County, Washington, U.S. Soil Conservation Service, I 973). The Alderwood series is made up of moderately well-drained soils that have a weakly to strongly consolidated substratum at depths of between 24 and 40 inches. The National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils does not list the Alderwood series as a hydric soil although. wetland conditions are common in depressional areas witllin Alderwood soil units. Topographically, the eastern third of the property slopes down from about elev. 416 along tile east property line to about elev. 406. Toe southwestern corner of the property is generally flat at about elev. 404 to elev. 406. T11ere. is a wetland area within this lower section of the property. Project No. 2010& Page No. 2 ]\,ir, Steve Beck December 1 5~ 2008 The uplarrd area on the eastern an northern sections of the property, outside of the wetland are occupied by a mixed conifer-deciduous forest stand. Red alder (A/nus rubra), big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllwn), and Douglas fir (Pseudorsuga menziesi[) are the predominant tree species on the site. Salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor) are commorr shnb species. Sword fern is a common groundcover species. A portion of the property across the north side and extending south from Anacortes Avenue NE shows some evidence of past grading. A storm drainage swale, draining to the west extends across the north property line, between the existing residential development and the subject property. WETLAND AREA We have identified the limits of a wetland on the northwest corner of the property as shown on the attached Site Map (Figure 2). Vegetation within the wetland includes black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera), Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia), and some red alder trees. Hardback spirea (Spiraea douglasi,) is the predominant shrub species. Using the U.S. fish and \Vildlife Service wetland classification system (Cowardin et al, 1979), the wetland includes two wetland habitat classes; Palustrine deciduous forest, and palustrine scrub-shrub. The southern limits of the wetland generally follow the southern property line. It appears that work for development of the playfield, included some grading and filling adjacent to the subject property. There also appears to have been some grading on the property related to construction of an outlet swale for the stonnwater pond on the property to the west. Hydrologically, the wetland is supported by surface runoff and near surface seepage from the adjacent side slopes, along with some discharge from the storm water pond to the west. Drainage form the wetland is by way drain pipe located along the south property line. At the time of the original site evaluation work in February, 2008, there was standing water to depths up to about 2ft. within the central sections of the wetland. TI1ere was no surface water present at tbe time of the site visit in August, 2008. The City of Renton Code identifies three wetland categories as follows (RMCM-la i. Category 1: Category 1 wetlands are wetlands which meet one or more offue following criteria: (a) The presence of species listed by Federal or State governmerrt as endangered or threatened, or the presence of essential habitat for those species; and/or (b) Wetlands having forty percent (40%) to sixty percent (60%) permanent open water (in dispersed patches or otherwise) with two (2) or more vegetation classes; and/or (c) Wetlands equal to or greater than ten (10) acres in size and having three (3) or more vegetation classes, one of which is open water; and/or ( d) The presence of plant associations of infrequent occurrence; or at the geographic limits of tl1eir occurrence; and/or ii. Category 2: Category 2 wetlands are wetlands which meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) Wetlands that are not Category I or 3 wetlands; and/or (b) Wetlands that have heron rookeries or osprey nests, but are not Category l wetlands; and/or Project No. 20108 Page No. 3 Mr. Steve Beck December 16, 2008 (c) Wetlands of any size located at the headwaters of a watercourse, i.e., a wetland with a perennial or seasonal outflow channel, but with no defined influent charmel, but are not Categor; 1 wetlands; and/or {d) Wetlands having minimum existing evidence ofhuman-rela1ed physical alteration such as diking, ditching or charmelization; and/or iii. Category 3: Category 3 wetlands are wetlands which meet one or more of the following criteria: {a) Wetlands that are severely distnrbed. Severely distnrbed wetlands are wetlands which meet the following criteria: (!) Are characterized by hydrologic isolation, human-related hydrologic alterations such as diking, ditching, charmelization and/or outlet modification; and (2) Have soils alterations such as the presence of fill, soil removal and/or compaction of soils; and (3) May have altered vegetation. (b) Wetlands that are newly emerging. Newly emerging wetlands are: (I) Wetlands occurring on top of fill materials; and (2) Characterized by emergent vegetation, low plant species richness and used minimally by wildlife. These wetlands are generally fuund in the areas such as the Green River Valley and Black River Drainage Basin. (c) All other wetlands not classified as Category 1 or 2 such as smaller, high quality wetlands. It is our interpretation that the wetland satisfies the criteria for designation as a City of Renton Category 2 wetland. It does not meet the criteria as a Category l wetland because it does not include the presence or habitat for species identified as endangered or threatened, it does not include open water within the wetland and does not have plant associations of infrequent occurrence. The wetland does not meet the criteria as a Category 3 wetland because it is relatively large and has not been significantly altered. The wetland meets the criteria as a Category 2 Wetland because it is not a Category l or 3 wetland and because it is relatively undisturbed. The standard buffer for a category 2 wetland in the City of Renton is 50ft. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT-WETLAND IMP ACTS It is proposed to develop the approximately 3.4 acre property for construction of a 4 lot residential development as shown on project maps by Baima and Holmberg and on the Site Development Plan (Figure 3). Access to the project will be provided by a private access roadway extending south from Anacortes Avenue NE. The site wetland and buffer will be set aside from development within a designated Wetland Tract. As designed, the project will not result in direct impacts to the preserved site wetland. The tract includes the wetland area witl1 a minimum 25ft wide buffer, in accordance with provisions of the Renton City Code which allow buffer averaging. Buffer Width Averaging Buffer width averaging may be allowed in accordance with RMC where the following steps are taken: Project No. 20108 Page No. 4 Mr. Steve Beck December 16, 2008 L That the wetland contains variations in ecological sensitivity or there are existing physical improvements in or near the wetland and buffer; and 11. That width averaging will not adversely impact the wetland function and values; and iii. That the total area contained within the wetland buffer after averaging is no less than that contained within the required standard buffer prior to averaging; and 1v. A site specific evaluation and documentation of buffer adequacy based upon The Science of Wetland Bziffers and Its Implications for the Management of Wetlands, McMillan 2000, or similar approaches have been conducted. The proposed buffer standard is based 011 consideration of the best available science as described in WAC 365-195-905; or where there is an absence of valid scientific information, the steps in RMC 4-9-250F are followed. v. 1n no instance shall the buffer width be reduced by more than fifty percent (50%) of the standard buffer or be less than twenty five feet (25ft) wide. Greater buffer width reductions require review as a variance per subsection N3 of this Section and RMC 4-9-250B; and v1. Buffer enhancement in the areas where the buffer is reduced shall be required on a case-by-case basis where appropriate to site conditions, wetland sensitivity, and proposed land development characteristics. vu. Notification may be required pursuant to subsection F8 of this Section. Bzdfer averaging element (Ui. and i1~ Wetland bufers are vegetated upland areas adjacent to and generally surrounding wetlands_ As such buffers are they provide beneficial functions within the urbanizing landscape in their realtionship to the the wetland and as upland habitat area. They provide beneficial funcnions as an element of the preserved wetland and as preserved upland habitat Buffer averaging is being applied to the site wetland. It is proposed to reduce the buffer width along the east side of the wetland where the roadway providing access to the proposed building lots will be constructed. The buffer wi.11 be expanded along the north side of the wetland. The wetland and buffer has been affected by existing development surrounding the property. The buffer along the south and west side of the wetland has been affected by previous development including the existing playfield which extends along the south margin of the wetland; and the existing storm water treatment facility extending along tl1e west side of the wetland_ Existing development on the south and west side of the property extends to the limits of the wetland. This past development activity likely filled some portion of the wetland. Buffers act as an integral unit of the wetland system in urban environment in providing protection to the wetland habitat, and in providing what have been identified as "sink" and "source" functions. They act to provide protection to the wetland in the form of generating a physical barrier between human activity and the wetland. Project No. 2010& Page No. 5 Mr. Steve Beck '.)ecember 16, 2008 "Sink" functions are those that in effec~ absorb impacts before reaching the wetland. They serve to moderate water !eve! fluctuations in the wetland; they serve to mediate chemical and physical impacts to the wetland from erosion, movement of sediments and pollutant into the wetland; and to moderate temperatue in the wetland. "Source" functions include the ro ]es served to the wetland system to support wildlife habitat, provide biotic input to the wetland system, and for their role in mediating effects of human disturbance to wetland associated wildlife. These "sink" and "source" functions are related to the vegetative cover on the buffer, the total area of buffer habitat included, the width of the buffer, sUITounding topography, and the level of development within the surrounding urban landscape. Existing residential development activity immediately adjacent to the subject property bas affected the effectiveness of the wetland buffers. This past development has created a small island habitat surrounded by the existing urban development. With buffer avara,,,oing as being proposed for this project there will be no loss in total wetland buffer area maintained within the project as compared with the application of a uniform 50ft buffer width around the wetland. With the maintenance of the buffer habitat area being provided wihin the Wetland Tract, there will be no significant reduction in the "~ource" buffer function. The preserved buffers can effectively provide roles in maintaining wildlife habitat, and in providing biological support by way of maintaining input of nutrients and organic matter into the sytem. This function within the developed project can be maintained and enhanced with the implementation of buffer enhancement plantings. As the vegetative caver on the buffer grows and matures the effectiveness in providing a physical barrier will be increased. This fuoction will be further enhanced by the installation of fencing to limit encroachment into the designated wetland tracts. "Siok'' functions to protect the wetland will be maintained in part by design of the storm water treatment system. This gystem can control the movement of stormwater into and through the wetland to minimize impacts on wetland hydrology. This system will likewise limit the movement of untreated run off into the wetlands. The proposed buffer averaging including enhancement plantings within the buffer can maintain a level of wetland and buffer function comparable to that which would be provided if a uniform 50ft buffer were provided within the proposed residential development and as part of the surrounding urban envirorunent. Buffer averaging element (iii.) There will be no loss of buffer habitat area in the developed project. Approximately 6,565sq.ft. of the buffer along the east and north sides of the wetland will be reduced to accommodate construction of the propDsed lots and the access road. A portion of the reduction is for Tract A. There are no plans for development of this tract at this time. The reduction in the buffer area al_ong the east and north side of the wetland is being compensated for by increasing the buffer area adjacent to the northwest corner of the wetland, by approximately 6,572sq.ft. As such there will be no reduction in the buffer area included in the project after the application of buffer averaging. Project No. 20108 Page No. 6 Mr. Steve Beck December I 6, }008 Buffer averaging element (v.) A minimum buffer width of25ft. is being maintained between the wetland and proposed new development. Buffer Mitigation/Enhancement Planting Plan We have prepared a conceptaal buffer mitigation/enhancement plan for the project The general design intent of this plan is to increase the density of native trees and shrubs within the preserved buffer and to control the growth of non native invasive species including Himalayan blackberry and others included on the DOE listing of invasive species. This conceptual plan as illustrated on Figure 4 (Buffer Averaging Mitigation Concept Plan) is prepared to demonstrate the feasibility of construction the project to meet City of Renton requirements for preserving wetland and buffer function. New native shrub plantings will be installed along the outer margin of the buffer where clearing for the new development will remove the tree canopy and possibly allow the establishment of non native shrub species. The wetland/buffer enhancement concept involves two objectives: 1. Control the growth of invasive plants, including Himalayan blackberry and Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius) and others as included on the DOE listing of non native invasive species. 2. Increase the overall cover of native trees and shrubs. A.s final project design plans are prepared a final mitigation plan will be prepared. This plan will include details as required by tbe City of Renton. 0 Construction plan 0 Planting plan showing details of plant numbers, species and spacing 0 Monitoring methodology. Monitoring will be carried out over a period of five years following completion of the work 0 Standards of success for evaluating the success of the project in meeting project goals and objectives 0 Contingency plan We trust the information presented is sufficient for your current needs. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call. Sincerely yours, A!derN-W ).~;?G)?~. Garet P. Munger Project Scientist Encl.: Figure l Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Vicinity Map Site .Map Site Development Plan Conceptual Buffer Enhancement Plan. Project No. 20 l 08 Page No. 7 i uj "' "z zo Cl'. f- . " zz "' -NI (/) ~~ . u. S' 0 w 0 f- w "· Cl) 0 u. . Oz ., 0 .• f- -z s: w z Cl'. w u. IO :;_ i': O(j z 0 "' Cl'. 0 Cl. ~ !'.JlOO:J<'N~ § "'; --- 1· ! ' Cl) CJ ..'!l a.. .c ..., a, ~ z ,- L_ ' L_ ' ·." "} g o n "'" , • w " ~ 0 ,5 V, ' i e 0 • "' ;.3,111ns :>JHdlflJDOdOl/).IJlfONflOf/ 1 \1ld 11:lOHS 1138dV'l\l:) I ---!· i~ I' +~ I '~. 'o 'o : -~ ,-6,i- e 90 L 1l 11.,zo._gz.~~ 1SB81\'lJON 81lll8A\f uonrn .i~ Hn-· 1,, .. zo.~r.ootJ VNl<NJ8 .-!O CtS'-'8 ~ m ~ I " G " -~ '-~;' -a. -,y-.I SUBDIVISION Issued By: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY by its agent: ~ TICOR TITLE COMPANY Guarantee/Certificate Number: 70020273 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, herein called the Company, GUARANTEES Encompass Engineering and Surveying herein called the Assured, against actual loss not exceeding the liability amount stated in Schedule A which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS 1. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the identity of any party named or referred to in Schedule A or with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. 2. The Company's liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability amount set forth in Schedule A. Please note carefully the liability exclusions and limitations and the specific assurances afforded by this guarantee. If you wish additional liability, or assurances other than as contained herein, please contact the Company for further information as to the availability and cost. Ticor Title Company 701 5th Ave., Ste. 2560 Seattle, WA 98104 Countersigned By: /( (L;:-; -j,,.~ ~- ; Authorized Officer or Agent Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate ~ ••• Page 1 Chicago Title Insurance Company By: Attest: President Secretary ,U'R 1 0 20i'J ('. )N Printed: 03.25.15@ 09:47 AM WA-TT-FWNT-02840.660004-SPS-1-15-70020273 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 70020273 ISSUING OFFICE: Title Officer: Donna Roetter Ticor Title Company 701 5th Ave., Ste. 2560 Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: 253-796-6583 Fax: 425-255-0285 Main Phone: (425)255-7575 Email: Oonna.Roetterl@TicorTitle.com SCHEDULE A Liability Premium Tax :=j $1,000.00 $250.00 $23. 75 ~-~--~-- Effective Date: March 18, 2015 at 12:00 AM The assurances referred to on the face page are: That, according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matter relative to the following described property: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF Title to said real property is vested in: Fred Alberts and Donna Alberts, husband and wife -- subject to the matters shown below under Exceptions, which Exceptions are not necessarily shown in the order of their priority. END OF SCHEDULE A Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page2 Printed: 03.25.15@ 09:48 AM WA-TT-FWNT-02840.660004-SPS-1-15-70020273 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description Lot B, City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-03-098 as reocrded under recording number 20040212900008, records of King County, Washington. Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page3 Printed: 03.25.15@ 09:46 AM WA-TI-FWNT-02840. 660004-SPS-1-15-70020273 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 70020273 SCHEDULE B 1. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2015 Tax Account No.: 102305-9095-03 Levy Code: 2100 Assessed Value-Land: $6,200.00 Assessed Value-Improvements: $0.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: Paid: Unpaid: Affects: $91.18 $91.18 $0.00 Taxable portion of said premises 2. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2015 Tax Account No.: 102305-9095-94 Levy Code: 2100 Assessed Value-Land: $0.00 Assessed Value-Improvements: $0.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: $0.00 Paid: $0.00 Unpaid: $0.00 Affects: Exempt portion of said premises 3. The Land is presently classified as exempt and may be subject to the collection of back taxes for a possible three to ten year period, depending upon the actual use classification of the property during its exempt status. Inquiry should be made to the King County Assessor's Office or the Company for additional information. Tax Account No.: Levy Code: 102305-9095 2100 4. A contract of sale by and between the parties named below Dated: November 11, 1975 Vendor: Fred Alberts and Donna Alberts, his wife Vendee: First Church of the Nazarene, Renton, Washington Recording Date: November 18, 1975 Recording No.: 7511180394 Excise Tax Receipt No.: E327998 Said contract has been partially fulfilled as to the )NBS! 550 feet of Lot A adjoining, by Statutory Warranty Deed recorded under recording number 7611220691.-·· Affects: Said premises and other lands Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page4 Printed: 03.25.15@ 09:48 AM WA-TT-FWNT-02840.660004-SPS-1-15-70020273 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B ( continued) 5. Statement of fact and the terms and conditions thereof: Recording Date: Recording No.: October 28, 2014 20141028000556 / GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 70020273 6. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: In favor of: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: Puget Sound Power & Light Company Electric transmission and/or distribution line September 12; 1940 3120992 /" Portion of said premises 7. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: In favor of: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: Puget Sound Power & Light Company Electric transmission and/or distribution line August 8, 1950 4043986 /. Portion of said premises 8. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: In favor of: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: Puget Sound Power & Light Company Electric transmission and/or distribution line June 24, 1980 / 8006240435 t Portion of said premises 9. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document: In favor of: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: City of Renton Public utilities September 2, 1~1 81 09020545 ,, Portion of said premises Said instrument appears to contain errors in the description of said easements. 10. City of Renton Ordinance number 4612 establishing an assessment district for sanitary sewer service facilities and the terms and conditions thereof: Recording Date: Recording No.: Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate June 21, 1996 / 9606210966 Page 5 Printed: 03.25.15 @ 09:48 AM WA-TI-FWNT-02840. 660004-SPS-f -15-70020273 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B (continued) GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 70020273 11. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, recitals, reservations, easements, easement provisions, dedications, building setback lines, notes, statements, and other matters, if any, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth on Renton LLA number LLA-03-098: Recording No: 20040212900008 ,/ 12. Any rights, interests, or claims which may exist or arise by reason of the following matters disclosed by survey, Recording Date: Recording No.: Maya, 1979 7905089006 Note: The Public Records indicate that the address of the improvement located on said Land is as follows: vacant land END OF SCHEDULE B Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page6 Printed: 03.25.15 @ 09:48 AM WA-TT-FWNT-02840.660004-SPS-1-15-70020273 geoAdvantage: King Cou >fWashington State (App3) Page 1 of 1 ~/ \ l I "'o'<'- . \\ ... z n • .. \~ f J ,; r"--T .s&•~' '".,.~ . ' ---~ .. • 1 M'.e~toN -·--·-· ~ ~,-·.. . NE:. 9th Pl ,',' "'-' V, .. -.. ,-- I . .. C ~-'" . " ·::.-'' NE H11 s- ,··- -,. .. NE 9th S Nt: 9TI-ST . . . ,. -·:::-. .. . .. --. * . . . . . .. C .. . .. . .. -.. ... -· . ' - .,. •' \v'"' -·'.t «, +-~,:. t-".:--. ~~ ' <::? .. ~ "'" 00 .. • ;z .;i ' ·,-~ .. r •> "' \ . '· ~ = ' ', . ,~ 0 ,, .: ii -. -~I;. i ~ -~ ;; ~C:,. ~E 8th S . uf' A~U ,,._"r I '\ l I • I ' II Sentry Dynamics, Inc. and its TICOR TITLE COMPANY customers make no representations, Ad t warranties or conditions, express or geo van age implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of information www.sentryctynamics.net contained in this report. http://geo.sentrydynamics.net1WA_king/default.aspx 3/24/2015 • ----~------- .,, on 0 0 0 11 IIDt:D ••• • 10 44 m.,i> for Recoro atcRiijiii,o\i1 1:, I ;; • .1 LV /I//:,, ~J "····-·--- , .. ')Jies:;j(fo,-I )2, fl'V« S (:_ _ -,~/,,,.. w .... 4 .2.1£J-r' • j I ~ 1 . ,. i ,.OIIII Lia Statutory Wcimmty DHd THF. GR.'1,\'TOR J&IIIU LOUISI APILSffl, !or.rl7 Jlllfll LOtns, COll:LIS •nd lAIS L&RSSBR APILSKTB, her bub•lld •l.ttet OCtoMr 13, 1961 for and in cnn~..-lff'i.lion uf ~n Dolbra ($10.00) •nd othtr .... •d Yalubl• eoasidention iri hand paid, OIHIYeyS and n.r111.n1s to nm, ALID.'IS and !XaM AI.BBi ts, lustb•nd itftd ll'if• thf' followinit dncribcd rc-al t,qait, sltuattd in tlr Cnunry nl \\"a.~hin111on· , State-or TIN Nortb °'* .. 11a1r or tha S•th OD9•b•lf ot tba Socathw.111t Q11•rter of Nort-..t Qurta-r of S.c:ttoa 10, Ton111.tp 2.S lfortb, ~np ,: s.w.H,, LltSS tM W.tt }O t"Nt tlM:nol' for re1d parpoaa, iALlS i'.'(; ··,, :,· f'}l/~::·:r .'rF 11,.~·~.:.~~\'\ i Jil(,I\ ~i.q,{ .~.,;.., \-' ".'""!i\1LLER ~ ar ..... ~S..:...: .. S.t_!.·?...-~:.r..--~--~-~-L, o£PUTP nu dMd b ciw11 in taltill•at oL tbat cartda Noll Ht•ta coatract betwen JlffllD U.IBI C<aLIS. I widav and ,uaf·" ALIIU'I5 ... Dtal .uJlll:'IS. hHINDd lad wile, dated t .. 7th. dlJ' ot. Octoblr, 1'61, •nd coaditt-• f« tbl conNync• ot tba abna deacrtbad prOp11rt1, aad tht ccr•enanu ol warrntr hllnill conUined man not applf to any titl•. intanat or eac:•brance uieiac bf, tllrclUp; or ndet' tlrll: purclul,.r in fli4 contract, •ad tll.all not appl1 to ny tea, ...... _llts or other ebargu l•.,iad, HM Hid or ~c.tac: daa l'tb .. qaant tio t• datll of .. id contract. Subject to all ea••nta~ r.atri.ctiOII..I dd t"eNrTati.•• ot record. if a,. ... dayof ....._r, 1961 • V Descripeion: King~WA Document -Year.Moneh.Day.DocID 1973.823.398 Page: 1 0£ 1 Order: br Co.mmene: 1+-!<1<1S cic u-15 .... - REAL ESTA TE CONTRACT !lovember- FRED ALBERTS aod DO~ .:u.FE..TI'S, his 11He FIRS'l' CHURCH OF 'fflE ll'.Z.\REIIE, Rentoo., Washington .......,!er <allld lW ~." WlTS£SSITll: n..t UM .u., qna, to ldl. to U1r pwda,Nr ...t tk _.... .-1o ~ froa tk .is.r ,:.., ......... ._... ra1 ISi.its, 9\tb tk app.i11manm1, i.l KDIO c-r. seau-of w~. PARCEL A; lier-th 100 feet r,;t' North !lalf o:r so1.1th nalf of KH.1,t,bi,cest ',.UB.r..er of the Jorthwest q_ll,llrter located in Section 10, to.a.snip 23 North, Range 5 East, ·11. M,, in King Cou.nty, .. a.ob~: Except portion lying 'within 1:12nd Ave. S.. E. parcel 8: !ortil half of so12.th half of soJJ. .. b..rest .:;,.us.rt.er or .,ort.hwest. quarter of Section 10, Tovnship 23 lorth, Ra:age 5 East, rl~ M., 1n King Coimty, Wasbington: Except t.lle !lortn 100 feet thereof and excep_t the south llO feet thereof, and except port.ion lying w-ithin U2nd ii.ve. s. E. -~· "Thi: ia.. ud ~OU ~ tlw ,;oatn,ct U.: U. f..UO-.; The ~ pria, is 3.EVEJft'Y 'l'&CUSAm> ABO lll/100 • -... • .. • • ... ---• -'' 70,000.00 -.l D6n. *'-"* 'NDn' 'l!lOUSAJD ABO -.J/lf:X. • --• ------.. -• • • {S 20,0CIO.OO l ~-- ....,. pl,id, llli< .-. .....-01;. ~ ~-·---al .W. ,.,._ ,-b _. t. PIW • ...,_. '?'Ell '.fflOUSAJl:i AI> WJ/J.JXJ -... --($10,000,00} dollars. or.. or betore tbe 15th day or Illy 19161 aDd "m 'l'B)I.Js,\1(1 AID -rtJ/100 ----($10,000.00) dollars on or befO!"e t.be l5tb. day or ltoveaber l'J76, and ·.;.b.e balance of se.1d plU'Cllase prlce &hall be paid as roa1111s: 1VO BOlm.Bm SEVf:lln EICll'l' Md 12/100 -----($276.12 ) dollars or oo:re at purchaser's option~ on or t:erore the 15th Uy of De~e?Dber 19 76 and 'NO BUll>8ED SE'1FJfl'Y Eiar.r and _12/100 ----• • ---($278.12 ) dcllars., or .oore at pw-i:baeer's option, on or-before tbe 15th day of each succeeding ::alendar month until the bal..ance of said pu.rebase pr1~~ shall ba-rc beell fully paid.. The purchaser f~~& to ?l>Y illterest on tb.e diainishlng balance of t~e r-etnt!in~:ig t. J'J, 000 .O<at the rate ,;ir 7 1/2 per cent per :Um\11 rroa the 15th day of lloYellbM 197t:, -.;bich intere1;,"t sm'' · ·1e deducted from each 1.a.atal.l!ae1lt.. payment and the bala.ace of each payment app.lied. ~'-' reduct1oo of pr1L.c1pal.. Seller .i.grees to de-ed release to tnlrch'J.ser the '#est 440 feet or ':.he property cc or b~fore 2..t PUrchaser's option June· 3, 1976. .--~1-; y ,; ;_:, I 1'1 ,0':,_ .... ,-...... -,......... -~ i;'.,\ w • _. "1Drr p1tc,c ... 1k • Jct -Y .an.:t ill lfflW!I--===~=~=--.... -~, /:."3:.!';'(..:_.0 ~ \ 11r, m"nnd. 1,g ill Um aiolnd. ·,kk-of dmiac" tfl&II..,.. llove111ter 15 1 1975 _,. ~'.J~ (11n..~-.aod-,ra.!>Dpo:ybefone~.U~-'8d.-rsWt1111fasc ...... ~) ~ .. = !.~i:o~o~hu~UNlpl~/~ ::-~~ ~"!= !'j~~v ~ dr u=::'.:~ ~~/ ,.latak,LkP11rdraioEr~1opt.y~-bd0tt~. ~'--·· .... ·-··· o · fl) ":"R i:ai,tlwrrr il.DttS. \llllil UII, ~rcil,at pnc2" i, l,alfy pa,d, tO &ttp lbr llwJdwo DOW ud bf~~!'f('O ....... -.-...r=· -m:1 t.o tbe :ad,al QM -..J..., :bnwl :apiat ~ or <I.a---?,y boa lu-1' m<l -.,,i,-,dmnD 1i1 1 c<>111p,a,) :a .. Vl W. i/61,.J~ a.a< lilt lriln's bm!fit. ,-b.i:I !Zit<~ may :appear, .ad 1.0 pay .If ?ff!IUUIIIS tMrdor and u, dellWT an po· •......W. W .... .- ·1· n.. p~•<h&tef ·~ ,Wt iuU impo"1i~a oi .....:I rn.l u!u~ hu. ~,,,, ""'"" ->nd tl-1t ncl'...trer th~ .. nn-nor h~ be hrld "' any <O¥...._.,: ""1P«1"'1 ',11,e condido,i ol :aov ,m;,r,,vm:rn::. 1boroo11 "'" <ball the pu1~r or .. 1:...-or !M a~t ol rill,.., ~ ~Id 1n any <<n 1"1111 or ICt~t :or 1Jtrnuom.. impront11tni, ~ r.,:a,r, ulUOM.• !.ho: ,·,,·e<Wit or 1(rttfflt'!lt n,!iod Of> a <ontlincd hrttill or .., ,n -.rit111:: :tlld •11.:adiod to ,nd made :a p.,,rt Q-f tb,. ,o:.:nct '4) TI>c po.,r,:~ucr =~-. ..,. ,JJ UArd, of~ 1, or ,;k,1..,,,t1<1n ol in,· lffl+"'l•·rm,rnu no• on ~ ""I ota;r or horreahu placed '~'"""· ~nd o1 .!,., • . ..k,n~ <>i .,_..od rd! e,t..l• or 11l} l"lrl. Lbo,rn/ :~, pu.~,ii< ....,._ ,~r' nff' !!u! no •u<h cam.:;.;,. dt,1....,,,N>n or 1•kini ,.,,II «>n>lilulr :a r.,,;:~,. of cor.,io::l•t>lL/Jn [n °""' ,n~ poor: ?i ,aid ,ei,; ~•e ~ ~ !'>r puh:ic 1>!-t. :h, p-~;on of tho!-condrt1>11.iltioh 1,.~,d rrn.nn,nK l::n Pil} 'l!~-! oi rf:l.1<)11.ble til)HL<e<-~: p:...:unna tho ,_. = :-AJ.J; bi, p>.id 10 th• ><ii•• lrd llP,>~r<. ., 11-,,ymraL ftr, 1i,,,. po,n:h:i .. pr..-, il•mn uni.,, :h• «ell.,. ,tec•1 t<> •llo• lb p,.n:!a,,,., tn •PPI> ,n nr, pnrhoa o! '"''Ii c<,U<'..,...,n.:atinn ,,..ro;i •c, !1:1' rebuilci!I'! or ff"'!'>T>· i,~,, ~! 1n·. 1mp,,,,·,mcn11 oian~ ~--uch w.lur..:: fn c= <>i 1im.l,e <>r dK:ru'liM 'r"m i r,tr,I m, ... ,.-,: ~u,n<!, tho :,r0<n"<i• "' , ... h ?a.nr." ""'"···~: ,::,c e~,r..cct "·' "h< '°""""f'c n;>r.,'< n: (h'~C~nnc· •ic ""'' ,,.:.,,., 1,,·o\c,; ,,., i~r r,.w,r1:1on <>~ rrhu,:,Jmc ·,t .,.,h ,,,-:,ro·ei..•,·, ·,c , ,,,, ,u,•~ .. me cc.:e» ;:,,,:···•"<• <'iecs ·>i~: ,..d e'''·C·-,:• .... ,.; '· ;,,e~ • ·•., >t!h r~, ipPioc,,.o~ nr. •he ~u, •i., ; · .. ...,, ...... -, '"-••'.·· ...... ~ -, ,..._,., ~.. .... ' ,.,.. ... :t.r D•"·""'' • ""< '"·: L~h><>r1: .,• "''! • ;,, • ·cJJn,s '··-,.,, !•"'"' '·· ·•,.v~ ',! ,:,,,, •. ·, «<,· ,:Ir :a , .. ,,,~ "'' ·~· ;'""· .,,,i ,~~:,,~-~= ~' "·•:-, n-· ,her :/",.in ·~, ' ''·,-~ ~. -,.,.,,,,. ,, -,nl"1-"1 ,-,,, ·~Ci:!: <e.,r ")c; hu.,,;: '&'. ,,..1 "''"' :n~rt•••• "' !~M" obl,1.1:.~o .:,: ·-., • .,.,. 1,·,::,' ._,.".• .,.,-,...., .·,• Description: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1975.1118.394 Page: l of Order: br Comment: ~--~- _ _J_ ' I (6J U Nin', 1*tJI to oa'4 nal --II. •l>jed liD ut. sWJac tllllllnc:t or ,;,oatmU,..... ._. .r i, ~ 9id re.I ttWc, or d7 -1pp M" olba-oWlc,atiu. WWdli .at, k to i-1, ...... llfm. i. --uo;e Pl'J-flt_,.,_ .,itJa 11w Imm Lhnti,f, ud .... mbaa_ a., ~ -a kaw 0. rlidl& 1iD .... uy p,1,-,al;:I ~ to -.. !lit •tau1t.. ud .. .., JIO.Y""""b • -.dot IN.II ~~I.Odie Pl)"aBIB -~ ... tllt.., ..... !Wt~. er, n. ar ..-. "fla. ""1IMaa w .-~ ., tM ~ ~ lllld illla.l • u. __, 1bowe ICIICIW. to -..u, uc1 ~tao~ .. lbt~~J hl:"11~ -e'.".:.t dlledto.id rw.1<%111, ncor,i.,11:::an• -t1 tbte=fkrtaftcr talm ra.. i-llk-. '-of~~ uy ~-, lltadl UtQ-4',k of do.;'IC ~mudl uy pmoa oth<r ,•.an IM ot!lrr, and ollb)Ktttollie~· sr.•.n or wASIIINCtO!f. Fred ',l. Alberts a.ad. Donba Alberta ""_._..ra •• ~ s....,. ... _. ... --..1 t11t "-.-1 i......-e........, ....... .,n•• tbey ,..... dR -• tbei:t fra P4 .__,,. .-i: _. ~..,; •·..J.;. "J.l ...... dim!il,......... • I" Utll ~Y ol lk>Telber 1975 21 ~-/' ~-' eye~ -< r_.~."":f:;( ~-~ .... rn::-.,..;,-·-- !i~~ ,..,~ -.. for i• Sto4 ~, ····: ,~.' ,• . ,.:_-,T ·' ,..,,.,, ---··---~~"t;!~,L--•-. *-IL 'l'O: lorthvr.st Jtilortgage & Escrow ot ,<ea.ton 35 3o. Or->..dy iJa:, Re11:toD • 'ole.sb!ngton 96055 :a liJ s -1 ' ' 01. 3~~v~~ 113'1111~ 1VNOUVN b33NOl!!.J!II' ,----~0 Description: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1975.1118.394 Page: 2 of 2 Order: br Comment: ------------~;;;;._==....- ·-· ' • i Statutory Wammty DNd i I I I I I • ~ ~ l ;2. TIIEGRA.~T01.1, FRED ALBERTS and DCNlfA ALBER'!'$, his w1f•, -~ '" ..:.. ~ For and iii camiditraliion ol T•:n. Dollars and other good e.nd valuable cons1d•rat1one FIRST CfflJRCH OF THE lfAZARENE., R•nton• W"asb1ngtOI.I tk ~ described rml n1atr, lif.iaud ia !k C.-cy of King , S1ai1t-ti W ..... OII: Tha vest 550 teet or,. P.lRCFL A.: North 100 r .. t or t!le north. balt or south. balt' of southwest quarter or the northwest quarter located in Section 10, Township 2) Horth, Range 5 Ea.at, W.R., 1n ~1ng Count7,. W&shington: Ezcept portion lyf.ng within 132nd A~e. S.E. ~he W•st 550 feet or, PARCEL B: Borth ba.l.t' o~ sout~ half of southwest quarter of northwest qu&rter of Section 10, ToVD.l!lhip 23 North• Range 5 East, W.M., in K1ng County_, v .. h1.ngton; Except the north 100 feet tbereot and except the south 110 teet thereat', and .xcept po~tion lying within 132nd Av•• S.E. Partial Tbts d~ed l.!11 she• 1r,' flllfilQle.D.l of th1.t c111rt&l• re.i es~t" coatl"act between Ul.e patties ben,.t.o, C::<1ted November 11 , li 75 , aad. ~ondlltloaed rot tbe cOGYeyance of Ute abo•e d'!'Scrlbed pro1>ert1,and th• cove•aats or •an&•t1 illerela coat&ID1Pd aball not •PJllY to an7 htle. 1nteri~st or e ncumbr:ancl!! ari.slnc by. Ulroa•b l'lt 11nder tbll!' parcb•all!'r ID s•ld coD traet, •nd sball not acr'.Y to ;.ny ta1es. as,essments or otber cbarcea leYled, a.aaeaaed or beco•Lac due s11bsequent t'I th .. dalll.!" ;it said cr,ntract. 8th SM.ES r,a..x. Pl\iJ i).'l COti'?.>:.: ~,r ~,:;_i_};__z?J.i' KING ~O RfCC,~;jS 011/iSKFN i'I_....._, ---"'"c<-'':..lk4!!<'_ ;,i::_' ---:ri -, OtPUTT ST.~TE OF '1i.-o\SHisGTO~. f ... Cowt)' of King 1 On this•>· ~ly appeared tirfore rw .. , " Novet111ber, 1976 ,,/ fl/1 II J. ~-.;.~.a ............. ~===="'----4-u..# ~A:='"'...,,"""'"'""'---"'CZ""ill-=~==-"-, F'r•d Alberts and Donna Al.bert:!I ta -\-a IQ tw it. i-iw' ... ' s dm:iibed' it 1111d rio ~ !he wit!mt ud ,..... ~ - their ha-nd ""•tuJ .a ad dmd, far dlr ~-they llipedt!lla111eu u., .... ~ --.......... Gt\'EN t.iDC1rr fflJ :.aad ad •• •1 ~- Description: King,WA Document -Year.Month.Day.DocID 1976.1122.691 Page: 1 0£ 1 Order: br Comment: ~/.o(t" ~S; AMERICAN w ~\; \L. AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO; • 11i11111111111111111111 20141028000556 FIRST AMERICAN rlISC 1• .8I PRGl£•991 OF 013 10128/2114 II :26 KING COUNTY, \.IA Name Address City/State Renton Church of the Nazarene PO BOX 2640 Renton, WA 98059 Document Tltle{s): 1. Statement of Fact Reference Number{s) of Documents Assigned or released: 7511180394 Grantor(s): 1. Renton aiurch of the Nazarene 2. ) Additional information on page of document Grantee(s): 1. Renton Church of the Nazarene 2. J Additional information on page of document Abbreviated Legal Description: LOT B, BLA NO. LUA-03-098 LLA, REC. 20040212900008, KING COUNTY Tax Parcel Number{s): 102305-9095-03 and 102305-9095-94 J Complete legal description is on page of dccument · :S DOCUMENT :s RECORDE,, .".SA COURTZSY ONLY. FIRST AM::PrCM,1 TITLE /NSURANC.: r.o. ASSUMlS ff; LIABILITY FOR 1':iUFFICIENCY, 1i,.:;uo,rv OR ".CURACY 20141028000556.001 Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC:2014 20141028000556N53033 Page 1 of 3 Created By: Hemalatlla.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3: 10:31 AM !ST " ' 20141028000556.002 To Whom It May Concern: 10/24/14 Page 1 of2 STATEMENT OF FACT This document is created to confirm and solidify the facts regarding the property owned fully by the Renton Church of the Nazarene and/or Church of the Nazarene in Renton Parcel #102305- 9095. This parcel, along with the parcel #102305-9078, was purchased on November 11,1975 from Fred and Donna Alberts on Contract #7511180394 for a price of $70,000.00, $40,000.00 of which was paid by 11/8/1976. Prior to the construction of the Church building in 1980 the entire balance of the land was paid off. This was a requirement of the Bank to make the building loan. The Bank loan was paid in full in 1993. The Renton Church of the Nazarene and/or Church of the Nazarene in Renton has been debt free since 1993. Rustin E. Brian, PhD, Pastor of the Renton Church of the Nazarene and/or Church of the Nazarene in Renton, Stephen C. Dillingham, Secretary of the Board are authorized by the General Church of the Nazarene Manual page 65 #102.3 "The pastor and the secretary of the church board shall be the president and secretary of the church, incorporated or not incorporated, and shall execute and sign all conveyances of real estate, mortgages, releases of mortgages, contracts and other legal documents of the church not otherwise provided for in the Manual and subject to the restrictions set forth in 104-104.3." We do attest to fully owning the Parcel #102205-9095 that we are currently selling. We attest to no outstanding liens or taxes due now or in the past on our property. Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC:2014 20141028000556-53033 Page 2 of 3 Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3: 10:32 AM !ST .. . Signatures: Renton Church of the Nazarene P.O. Box 2640 850 Union Avenue N.E. Renton, Washington 98 6 By: Rustin E. Brian, PhD, President, Pastor of the Board vd::iKM dtb c}o/Y / 20141028000556.00l Page 2 of2 ~/J. rY...u/t/,t1yJ A.Lee CHERYL B. LEE NOTARY PUBLIC STATE Of WASHINGTON co.rMISSIOH EXPIRES JUNES, 2018 Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC:2014 20141028000556-53033 Page 3 of 3 Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3: 10:32 AM !ST r !&Smt lept 12 4v / 3120992 / Z..it ' ,o ti ovc / .1nne G •erriok; Lue Merrick ..a ley ~ndHe!"l!l:l Balley,llll, Wllli• '-orlisa ad.Jen.Die L .-i: Corl1 ,a,m.f to PUget Sou.rid. Power a4Lig.t:t Coapt.111, • !da • erp Fp cyana grnt t sp---se 2970090-~~~l• ofp6l .. --- flle Nt or tlll St o,' ti. swt or tne ~t ~: Jee lo tr,, 113 ar 5 ·----th• ce::t 111---a::-110w loc oa. •• 11111y r•lt'oated by irutual oonaell\- ---(bl sat 1:,g prctf strt okle.11)-----(mtg prgrf atriolte.11 )--- *1.llia:n corl11 Je,uue L ~111 Arule G lllerri oi: Lute Merrici: Bailey Barloa. Bat le:r by Jlanuel T9rry ail JC ow S. ;:t 4 t..· b •111 ia III C0r 111 an o J' • :.n i e L Oor li • bt ld-.rd F Thwii::g np r Jr ta• n NI at I na rsb 3 4..3 ~cw 3'pt 4 40 by Mllilllel T•rrr air ror A.Dne G ~arrioi:,Lu• lllerrioi: Ba Uey an:l.he. rlan oa Uey bf .l.dw4'1'(1. o •::.w .ng n; for t l:le ,.. re, at a I Fe~ 3 '3( al Sc swl J ·"' .I '1 {i \ ~! EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SYSTEM ,..., RECORDED lHIS ~AY Ju~ 11 \0 z9 !M 'Bl -, ... ~,1': ., '. ,iiJ,; :Jf- R"Ec:,iPDS. /, ELECTIONS .iNG CuUN1Y t::; ~ ------~F~I~R~S~T_,,C~H~U~RC,,,,H_O~F'----THE="'-'N~A~Z~A~RE""'N~E~,c__cRE""'N~T~O~N~,c_cl<~A~S~H~I~N~G~TO"""N~,c_---- ~ ("Grnnlor" hcrmnl, granla, ~onvcyJ 11nd wnrrnnl9 lo PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, 11 Wrishlngton cor- poration ("Grnnlcc" horcin]. for lhl' purpose., hcroiMf1or sci forlh II pcrpr.lunl unsumunt under, ntTOSli nnd over the [ol- ,_, lowing clcscribocl roal properly [the "Property" herein) King County, W11-'ihh1gton. '" ,, ' , :~ ~ N~ ,o The North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; E1{CEPT the north 100 feet thereof and EXCEPT the south 110 feet thereof, and EXCEPT that portion lying within 132nd Avenue S. E- ~ -~ 2 Excopt as mny bo olherwise sol for!h herein Grantoo·s rights shall be oxercinu.l 11pon !lint portion o! the Proporly [1h11 HRl11ht- of W11y" herein] described !Ill follm\lS: ITEWgltt-,,f.W~--------,.feo+-ffl"l'ridth-flffl'ffl#-------------~~ffi'"WlffMl-11fl-@fltl~ltffftl&l'- lffl'!l''fte1111ri!ietl"11it-fm!-. The aouth 17.S feet cf the above described property. Providing access is not available over roadways and parking areas, Grantor agrees to construct and maintain a road for access purposes to Grantee's facilities, said road to be open and clear so that Puget's maintenance vehicles can drive to said facilities without having ta remove obstacles of any nature. Said construction and maintenance to be at Grantor's expense. J. Purpoge. Gran1011 !lhnll have lhu right to comlruc1,opernte, mnintnin, rcpnir, roplm:oand on largo an undergrDtllld eloc!ric transmission and/or dlslrlbu!lon sys1om upon nnd unrlor 1ho Righi-of-Way logulhor with all necell5nry or convcnienl Of>" purlon.1ncns thorofor, which mny includo b111 are not limitc-d !a Iha follawlng: underground conduits, cables, communlcnllon linos: vculls. manholes, sw:itches. .:md lrnnsformers; and semi•burled or ground mounted foci!ilie.1. Following lhc initial con- struction of its facilities. Cran!oo may from limo to time cooslrucl sud! ndclltionnl facllilias n5 ll mny req11lrc, 2. Access, Grnntoo sha!l have the right of nccll:IS 10 !he Right-<1f·Wny over om! al:r05ll the Properly lo unable Gron tee to exer- ciHC i!s righlS hereunder. rl"O'lidcd. lhul Grnntou shall compensnlr. Granlor for nny dnmngo lo IM Proporly caused by !ho exer- cise of said righl o[ access. 3. Ohstrucliom; LmKl,,eapin:, Gmnloo mU)' from limo lo lime remove rrces. bushl.'5. or olher ob.structtons within the Right. of•Wny and may level ;md grade the Right.of.Way to tho P.xlont rensonnbly nccess.1ry !o carry out the pul'p09<lll ~I rorth in fllll'llllrnrh 1 horonf, provided, th.it followlns any auch work, Gmnloe shall, lo lhe extiml run1:10nubly 1n-aclicuble, restore lhe Rlght-of:.Na}' 10 tho condition It was immediately prior lo such work. Following the instnllallon of Grantee's underground fucilitie5. Granier mny umlor1nko ,my ordlnnry improvements lo the lnndscnplng nf the Rlght-of•Wny, provided 1h01 no lrcos or olhcr plnnls s/mll he plncod thereon which w<-nlrl Ix, 11nronJonubly uxpomrive or improclical ror Granh111 to remO\le and restore. <I. Gnm1or'• U111 of iu,h1-of-Way, Grnnlor ruservmi the rii;ht lo 11110 !ho Righl-of·Wny For any putpOIIC oot lnconslslcnl wllh the righls herein i;ranled. prCJVided: lhal Cmn!nr sh nil 001 conslr11cl Ol' maintain any building or olher structure on the Rlghl- of-Wny which would lnlor[ere wllh lho mwrciso or the righls herein grnnted: thol no digging, lunnellng or olher form of con. struclion nctivily ~hnlt ha dona on lhe Properly which would rlislurh lhe compnclion DI' unearlh Cranteo's fncililles on lhe Right.of-Way. or ondonser the lntornl support tosnld focllllit>.s; nnd thnl no blasting shnU be done wilhin 15 feet or lhe Righi-of- Woy. S. lnd111nnlty, By accepllng nnd re-cordin9 lhill l'i11111men1, Gran lee apes Lo indemnify and hold ho rm less Gmnlor from any nod all d11inu for injuries and/or damas1111111ff11red by any person which may be caused by the Grantee's exercl,o of the ri11hts he:reln gr11nted; provided, thel Crenloo shell not be responsible lo Grenlot for any injuries and/or damages to any person cawed by acts or omiasiona o! Grantor. 8. Abandomner.l. The rlght5 hore!n 9rn.nted shntl c111,1tnue 11nlil such lime ns Grantee caasos 10 use tho Rlghl•of-Way for a period of f!ve (5) ,ucce9slve years, In which ovont !his nnsomcn! shall 1orminalo rind All righl!I horeundershall rBVerl lo Grnn· tor, prm'ided lhot no obnndonment shall he deemed to havo oc~urred by reason of Grantee's failure to lnillnlly Install u, facilities an the Ri#ll-of-Way wilhin any period or limo from Iha dalo hereof. 1. Succlllllll'll nnd i\llalgns. The rights und ob/ig;:i1ion1of lhe parties shnll inure ta tho benefil of and be binding upon their respociive 811 ~~4°2~-1~d aa.lgns. FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: KII/44 PUGET PO''IER 1% EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED R-1262 _REAL ESTATE DMSION ,188.l11.,, 235/38 PUGET POWER BLDG. BELLEVUE, WASHtilGTON 98009 By ATTENTION: WAYNE BRESSLER. . , King Co. Records Division / ' /, . .._,, / <,t,:.t_,,, _ _..\.. , Dnput1 l ' i Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC:1980 8006240435-53033 Page 1 of 2 Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:09:46 AM IST C ' ·~' I I DATED thla /2 .I!!. day of STATBOFWASHINCTON I ss COUNTY OF ) On !his day personally nppenrOO before mo .to-Rf/. GRANTOR FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE, RENTON, =;~·:;2?,e!"' %2 44: e;? -•.. ·--~,-,. !o me known to be lhe lndlvldunl _ dcm:ribed !n and who oxecuted lhe within and foregoing inslrurruml, and 11.cknowledged that ----signod tr.-: snmo ns frne nnd voluntary act and deed ror the U90!I and purJ105es therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hPnd nnd offlclnl seal this ___ day of ·"---· Nolary Public ln and for lhe Stole nr Woshingtun, rosldl1J8 al ------------------- STATE OF WASHINGTON J S5 COUNTY OF l On lhls dny permnnllr",1ppenred hefol'!I me la mo known In bo lhe indlvldunJ _ described in and who executocl the wilh!n o~d forogoilllj instromenl, ond ncknowlecJsed lhnt ----slennd lho snmo 1\11 froo and yo]unlory eel and deed for the uSIIS and purposos therein monlloned. GIVEN under my hm,d nnd official sool this ___ d11.y of ·"---· Nolnry !>ubl!c in and for lhe Stale of Washington, residing al ------------------- STI\TEOFWI\SHINGTON ] ss COUNTY OF ) On tills dny potsonnlly appenrod heroro mo to me known lo ho th!! individual_ delleribed Jn nnd who executed the within and foregoing inalrument, ilnd acknowledged Iha! ----sii,:ncd tho snmo ns rroo nnd voluntary acl and deed [or tho U!lllll and purpos,u therein menlloned. GIVEN umler my hand arid orricinl senl lhia ---day of ·"---· Notary Public in ilnd fo!' !he Stale of Woshinslon, rnsiding al ------------------ STATEOFWASHINCTON ) ss COUNTY OF King J CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT On this ~ dny of ..) U tJE'" , 19 .E.Q.. , llcfote me, lhe und11nrign11d, pernmnlly 11ppe1mtd LOJLIFI L P I.ti c:FI KE'~ nnd to mo known In bo !ho &,5.J'DR -PtU:'Sll><nJr nnd , ros[>8c1lvo]y, of FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE t REN'ltN, WJ\SH~rpomtion lhol oxocu!ad tho [ofm111111!1 instrument, nnrl nclmowlodged !~11 said inslrumont to bo 1hc [rm: and volunlary ;1cl nnd deed ur said corl)Urulion, for the _u9¥i'~'~f.~i-p.OSC:11 lherein mcntionetl. and 1111 11111h slated lhnt /:JE: IS authonzed lo ex11Cule lhe S11id' lns1rumenFqnd thiit tho seal nffilced is lhe oorporalo semi of snid corpornllon. · Wllness my h1mcl nnd offlciill seal hcnito afflxed the dAy ond your fir!I above wrillcn. 1,J~.11.,. g /1b44~ < Nolnry Public i and for 'Aa5lnte of 'Z(hlngton. re~Jding al s&o mis --,o . I I j 1 1 I 1 • Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC:1980 8006240435-53033 Page 2 of 2 Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:09:47 AM !ST .i .:: ' UTILITIES Ul !..~~.S..!!t!!.!. RECORllETl l ~; ::t 1 SU l lh, UI ·~I g'!' p,;:. on' ,.;;1_L "-I. '}0 ..cc~•S ~ D.!:t,i!C.'!6 -mG ,i;!>\ll;i'/ TH!S INSTRUMENT, made thislOthclay of __ -'"Je"Cl'-----------19...f!..Li by and between Renton Church of the Narnreoe<md, ___________________ ; ------------------'"'-----------------' ------------------·'"'-----------------' ------------------·'"'-----------------' hereinafter called "Grantods)", and the CITY Of RENTON, a /'lun·1cipal Corpor.atlon of K"1ng ~aunty. Washinqton, hereinafter called "Grantee". 111 TNESSETH: That sai4 Grantor(s), for and in consideration of the sum of S;,l.,sQO!!,,-___ _ aid by crantee. and other v.aluable consideration, do by 7,_c,-,-,-.-,-,-,e-,-,-,-.-,c"c"c'-,-,<,c,,-,";c,-,-"s'el 1 , convey, and warrant unto the said Grantee, its successors and asslgn5, an easement for public utilities (including water and sewer) with necessary appurtenances over, through, across and upon the fol lowi119 described property in King County, Wasllington, more particularly described as fol laws; Legal Description of Utility Ea~ements Easement 1#1, A 17.5 ft. Utility Easement Tbe aouth 17.5 feet o( the west 500 feet of the following: The N 1/2 of the S 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 10, TZlN, RSE, W .M., EXCEPT the north 100 feet thereof and except that portion lying withln 132nd Ave. SE. Eaaement 1#2 1 A 10 ft. Utility Easement The north 10 feet of the eal!lt 816.45 feet of the north 100 feet of the N 1/2 o( the S 1/2 of SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 10, TZ3N, RSE, W~M., EXCEPT portion lying within 13:Znd Ave, SE. Easement /13 0 A IS Ct. Utility Easement Commencing at the NE corner of the north 100 fed of the N 1/Z of the S 1/Z of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 10, TZ3N, RSE, W,M, and proceediog alol\g the north line of said subdivision N 8B0 Z4'47'' W 808.95 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence S 1°35'13" W 21B, 3 feet± to the south Hrle of the N 1/Z of the S 1/Z of the SW 1/4 o{ the NW 1/4 of Section 10, TZ3N, RSE: W.M. The above deac:ription is of the centerline or aaid lS' utility easement. rnrn !OR RECORD AT REQUEST_ 0~ QFn'.;E OF TIIE &ITT CtW fMT 1.hl MURtCl11Al BLDG. / 200 ;,1:ll AVE. SD. / ~ffT:!H, Ifft 98855 I 81/09/02 RECD F CASHSL 110545 B Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC: 1981 8!09020545-53033 Page 1 of2 Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:07:56 AM !ST • Said ~eretof~re mentioned grantee. its successors or assigns, shall have the nght, without prior notice or proceedl/lg at law, at such times as may be necessary to. enter upon said above described property for the purpose of.constructing, ma1ntafning, repairing. altering or reconstructing said ut11ity, or making any connections therewith, without incu1·rlng any legal obligat1ons or liabiltty therefore, provided, that such construction, main- taining, repairing, altering or reconstruction of such utility shall be accOftlllished in such a manner that the p,rtvate ill'4)rovements existing 1n the right right(s)-of-way shall not be disturtied or damagl!d, or in the event they are disturbed or damaged, they will be replaced in as good a condition as they were iRlll!diately before the property was entered upon by the Grantee. The Grantor shall fully use and enjoy the aforedescribed prem1ses. 1ncludfng the 1"1ght to retain the !"ight to use the surface of said r"ight-of-way ff such use does not interfere with installation and maintenance of the utility Tine. However, .the granter shall not erect buildings or structures over, under or across the right-of-wa.y during the existence of such utility. This easement, shall be a covenant running wfth the land and shall be Liind- ing on the Granter, his successors, heirs and assigns. Grantol"'S covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and .lawful right to execute this agreement. 1 -..., l, ,,,_;, _,.,n / ,'," ~:-1,, .~...-:"'e,V"' /-----:: Gr ,d,AA-c:::· and Ll_;Jc.,V-,A~ /~i.,°t>r-£>;;..-tf'r.._ / CORPORATE FORM: STATE OF COUNTY OF '· C / '"' '"' ss WITNESS Ill)' hand and official seal hereto affiJ(ed the day and year in th·is certi fi ca te above written • ; .I ! i I Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC:1981 8109020545-53033 Page 2 of 2 Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:07:57 AM !ST ' ' j l l i l l I i I l l } J [ I WHEN RECO~Offi RETURN iO: Office of th~ s:,t; .'.:rk Renton Muni(i,:,cl b...!iiding 200 MULA \'enue South Rent<>Q~,. ,..,~ C, ~ '-<? ~ CERTIFICATE I, the u~ ::rsignec!, W:'I Clerk of the City of R.:ntoo, W~hington, certify lllattbls Is a true Subscribed and Sea~>-:: J ~ ~-•-m• CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4612 .All! ORDIIUBCX OF TIil! CI1'l!' 01" RENTON, liASKIIIGTOl1", ESTULISl!IHG AN ASSES9llllill'l' DISTRICT POR II.AIIII'l'ARY SJnlEII. SUVICZ Il'I A PORTION 01!' THE SOOTII llIGIILAl'IDS, IIKATIID. DOltl!lS, AND IIAPLli'.WOOD SIJB-BAS:INS llllD ESTABLISBDIG Tlll! AIIOON'l' 011 Tll'.E CHAii.GE UPON CONNECTION TO TIIII: !IAC:CLITJ:ES • THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT'( OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS, SECTION I. There is hereby creat;ed a Sanitary Sewer Service Special Assessment District for the area served by the East Renton Sanitary Sewer Intercepeo! in the northeast quadrant of the City of Rent:on and a portion of its urban growth area within unincorpora~ed King County, which area is more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attaclled llereto. A map of the service area is attached as EXhibit ~s.~ The recording of this document is to provide notification of potential connection and interest charges. While this connection char~e may be paid at a~y time, t~e ' City does not requit"e payment until such time as the parcel is connected to and thus benefiting from the sewer facilities . The property may be sold or in any other way change hands without triggering the requirement, by the City, of paymenc of the charges associated with this district. SJctmN n. Persons connecting to tile sanitary sewer facilities in this Special Assessment District and wllicb properties ~ !!, ~ :l' ij ~ ::: = ~ 1il ~ A -~ h ~ < -,., i ~ is " ~ ~ i ~ t • ( > o:; r g J ' ! ' l ! i '{ .!'---------------------------------- Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC:1996 9606210966-53033 Page 1 of 7 Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:08:52 AM !ST j ' l j I ORDINANCE 4 612 have not been charged or assessed with all costs of the East Renton Sanit.ary Sewer Interceptor, as detailed in this ordinance, shall pay, in addition to the payment of the connection permit fee and in addition to the system development charge, the following additional fees: A. Per Unit Charge. New connections of residential dwelling units or equivalents shall pay a fee of $224.52 per dwelling unit and all other uses shall pay a unit charge of $0. 069 per square foot of property. Those properties included within this Special Assessment District and which may be assessed a charge thereunder are included within the boundary legally described in Exhibit "A" and which boundary is shown on the 'me.p attached as Exhibit "B." SEC'rIQII'. III. In addition to-the aforestated charges, there shall be a charge of 4.11\ per annum added to the Per Unit Charge. The interest charge shall accrue for no more than ten (10) years from the date this ordinance becomes effective. Interest charges will be simple interest and not compound interest. SECTION :ry. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty (30) days after publication'. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 10.th day of~.....><J~u~nce~~~ 1996. City Clerk 2 Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC:1996 9606210966"'53033 Page 2 of 7 Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:08:53 AM !ST ORDINANCE 4612 APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 10th day of ~-J_u_n_e~~~~~~' 1996. I j i " i ,. t 1 I I Appro~as to form, .. oe~~""PV"l2·- Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: 6/14/96 ORD.576:5/20/96:as. "" Ta!lller, Mayor 3 I I I I ' ~ !, ________________________ _ Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC:1996 9606210966-53033 Page 3 of? Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:08:53 AM 1ST I I 1 ' ' • i j l Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR THE CITY OF RENTON -EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR Portions of Sections 8. 9, 10, ll, 14. 15. 16. 17, 21 and 22 all in Township 23N. Range 5E W_M_ in King County, Washington Section 8, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of Section 8, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. lying East of the East right-of-way line ofSR-405 and South of the followtng descxibed line: Beg1nn1ng at the intersection of the East line of said Section 8 with the oenterline of NE 7th Street: thence Westerly along said centerline of NE 7th Street to its intersection with the centerline of Sunset Boulevard NE; thence Northerly along the centerline of Sunset Boulevard NE to the North line of the Southeast 'A of said Section 8; thence West along said North line to the East right-of-way line of SR-405 and the terminus of said line. Section 9, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of Section 9, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M_ lytng South and East !)f the following described line: · Beginning on the centerline of NE 7th Street at its intersection with the centerline of Edmonds Avenue NE; thence Easterly along the centerline of NE 7th Street to Its intersection with the centerline of Monroe Avenue NE; thence North along said centerline to the South line of the Northeast 'A of said Section 9; thence East along said South line to its intersection with the centerline of Redmond Avenue NE; thence Northerly along said centerhne to its J.nten;ection with the centerline of NE l 0th Street; thence East along said centerline to the East line of said Section 9 and the terminus of said line_ Sec:tion 10, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. All of that portion of Section 10. Township 23N. Range 5E W.M. lytng Southerly and Westerly of the following described line: Beginning on the West line of Section 10 at its intersection with the North llne of the South 'h of the North 1h of said Section IO; thence East along said North line to its intersection with the centerline of 142nd Avenue SE; thence Southerly along said centerline to its intersection With the North Une. of the Southeast 1A of said Section 1 O; thence East along said North line to its intersection with the East line of said Section l O and the terminus of said line. i l ' ' ' f I , ! ! i Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC:1996 9606210966N53033 Page 4 of 7 Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:08:54 AM !ST i I ' I I ; I 1 ' fLgal Description of the Special Assessment District for the City of Renton-East Renton Interceptor Section 11, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of the Southwest \4 of Section I I. Township 23N. Range SE W.M .. Section 14, Township 23N, Range 6E W.M. Page lof 3 All of that portion of Section 14, Township 23N, Range SE. W.M. described as follows: All of the Northwest \4 of said section. together with the Southwest WI of said section. el<Cept the South "'2 of the Southeast \4 of said Southwest \4 and except the plat of McIntire Homes!tes and 1h of streets adjacent as recorded in the Book of Plats. Volume 58, Page 82, Records of King County. Washington, and except the South 151.55 feet of the East 239.435 feet of Tract 6, Block l of Cedar River Five Acre Tracts as recorded in the Book of Plats, Volume 16, Page 52, Records of Ring County, Washington, less Vz of the street abutting said portion of Tract 6, Block 1, and less lract 6, Block 2 of said Cedar River F!Ve .Acre lracts. less 1h of the street adjacent to said Tract 6, Block 2. and except the South 82. 785 feet of the East 150 feet of Tract 5, Block 2 of said Cedar River Five Ac.re Tracts and less "'2 the street adjacent to said portion of Tract 5, Block 2. Section 15, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of Section 15, Township 23N, Range SE. W.M .. except the Southwest 14 of the Southwest \4 of the Southwest \4 of said section. Section 16, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of Section 16, Township 23N. Range SE W.M., exoept that portion of the Southeast V. of the Southeast 14 of the said Section 16 lying East of the: East line of the Plat of Maplewood r»vi-,ion No. 2 "" recorded in the Book of Plats Volume 39, page 39, Records of King Councy-Washington and its Northerly extension to the North line of said Southeast 14 of the Southeast 14 of the said Section 16 and except that portion of said section lying Southerly o_f the Northerly right-of-way line ofSR-169 (Maple Valley Highway). · Section 17, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of Section 17, Township 23N. Range SE W.M.. lying Northeasterly of the Northeasterly right-of-way of SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway) and Easterly of the East right-of-way line of SR-405 less that portion lying generally West of the East and Southeasterly line of Bronson Way NE lying Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC: 1996 %062!0966-53033 Page 5 of 7 Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:08:54 AM 1ST ugal Descriptirm of the Special Assessment Distrid far the City of Rmtan -East Rmum Imerceptar Page3of3 between the South line of the NE 3rd Street and the Northeasterly margin of SR- 405. section 21, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All that portion of Section 21. Township 23N, R 5E W.M. lying Northeasterly of the Northeasterly right-of-way line of SR-169 (Maple Valley I-fighway) and West of the East line of the Plat of Maplewood Division No. 2 as recorded in the Book of Plats, volume 39, page 39, Records of King County, Washington. Section 22, Township 23N, Range SE W.M. All of that portion of Section 22, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. descrtbed as follows: All of the Northwest I,<, of the Northeast \4 of said Section 22 lVinl! Northerly of the Southerly line of the Plat of Maplewood Heights as recorded fn the Book of Plats, volume 78, pages 1 through 4, Records of.King County, Washington. Together with the North 227.11 feet of the West 97.02 of the Northeast V.. of the Northeast V.. of said Section 22. I I I t i I I ' 1 ;j ' ' I J ,. ! Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC:1996 9606210966-53033 Page 6 of? Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga PrinteO: 3/26/2015 3:08:54 AM !ST • Exhibit B EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR Special Assessment District Boundary Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC:1996 9606210966-53033 Page 7 of 7 I ; • 2000 1 :24,000 ------City Limits CZT..Z-.2::J Special Atsaament Dlslrid Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:08:55 AM !ST • 'I "I ._, ,1 <: :I I ~ ,, I ~ ~ j ',WIMI 'N, ,c.~o):l ·"""''""'fl")nGS :;-,;o< l"ls ,;,::: ,a;uo~ ,v,1'1'll'..)•4lPSO!!lO .J-'-.~\Jr .L.'ib ,,:_:ic1:1c:.H~ 'Bf.'~' iC "' 0 0 T, " '.:;: 0 ~ z • -C ' t "~ rrr"</.".\""'-' ..... ' 0,1 .... ,.,;:.:".--,~ _J . ~ ''° . ~ ~j . .( J~~ ' :<. '. • J. I I , . --~~6fl?: , , J~~JJ ,6:~;,'l\lJI _:"',;.·c;c:s~. fr -~l..?6 ~-~' -·'?: 'J'fJ·,~, :;-,]~, .. ~·-,7.9( ~-~G-~~.J1N I )N,~V1e I~ ,,s~A/ 31'-4 )t,'V NQINn 'f ;! F't(D ·~ l :z / . --,c.)< oo,- z 0 >= a. ii: u If) w 0 ..J " /j .::: :j ] "' . ?:'. ' i ' ~ ' • • t ~ ~ ' I ! • --'--~ ' ;:II:, . ' i I m I I t • .1 l -> .. ~ • ... '---"'----'-----------------------------------°'~,, Order: QuickView_ Doc: KC: 1979 7905089006-53033 Page 1 of 1 g Created By: Hemalatha.Moduga Printed: 3/26/2015 3:06:45 AM 1ST AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) l ss COUNTY OF KING ) duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: being first 1. On the 11:t' day of _,A;'-"'"¥°=--=-··..,_\ __ __,. 20 IS . I installed --'-public information sign(s) and plastic flyer box on the property located at l\)E qi;i:: 5\---S: ~ orbz,s. A.,& J.JE for the following project: Project Name Owner Name 2. have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an "X" to indicate the location of the installed sign. 3. This/these public information sign(s) was/were constructed and installed in locations in conformance with the requirements of Chapter 7 Title 4 of Renton Municipal Code and the City's "Public Information Si stallation"~e. Installer Signature SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 1~ day of.....cAl"'~a...i.i_,_\ ___ • 20...1.6.._. Notary Publll Slate of Washington PETER ST PIERRE My Appointment Expires NOY 8, 2016 d¥rLAZ?Z:- NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at /+oo4-tJ'E I'@' $:: ls""'-+M, WT\ Mycommissionexpireson Nol[, Cfi~ ,'.l..o\(o 6 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\pubsign.doc Rev: 02/2015 :l RECEIPT EG00036410 BILLING CONT ACT Peter St Pierre Forest Contracting, Inc. 27018 233rd Pl SE Maple Valley, WA 98038 REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME TRANSACTION TYPE .. "'""'==•«•,-;-~ ,.,,,..,, """""" '"'"'"~'"'"'""""'"'='""""""""" '""~"'"""""'"""" '""'"'""'™~=== '"'""'"' ""'"""""' LUA 15-000239 PLAN -Environmental Review Fee Payment <,;:,;:" OOO.OllOIJ00,007.345.il1Ji4.000 $1,000,00 PLAN -Short Plat Fee Fee Payment . . 000.000000,007.345.81.01.000 $2,000.00• Technology Fee Fee Payment :• . '.;;' S03,000000.004.322.10.00.000 . . .. $90.00 • ••• Printed On: April 1 o, 2015 Prepared By: Clark Close . :· ( Transaction Date: April 10, 2015 PAYMENT METHOD """'"""'"""" ~""'''"'""' Check #2280 ' ·. Check #2280 Check #2280 ;' /. sua TOTAL TOTAL r;"' ~\'. .. AMOUNT PAID $1,000.00 r, •:> .. :;. $2,000.00 . .. :!. $90.00 $3,090.00 $3,090.00 ... :·,, ,.~D ,: ,.. ~ ,_._ 1- Paga 1 of1