The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReport 01' CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: September 23, 2013 To: City Clerk's Office From: Lisa M. McElrea Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office Project Name: Salvatori Additional Animals LUA (file) Number: LUA-13-000673; AAP Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Gerald Wasser Acceptance Date: June 3, 2013 Applicant: Susan Salvatori Owner: Susan Salvatori Contact: Susan Salvatori PIO Number: 3307800070 ERC Decision Date: ERC Appeal Date: Administrative: Denial: July 5, 2013 I Approval August 21, 2013 Appeal Period Ends: July 29, 2013 I September 4, 2013 Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: The applicant is requesting approval of an Additional Animals Permit to allow the keeping of five dogs where three household pets are allowed (RMC 4-4-0lOG.1) Location: 1315 Redmond Place NE Comments: A denial of the additional animals permit was issued on July 5, 2013; the denial was based on a letter from abutting property owners describing excessive barking. The applicant, subsequently, requested reconsideration based on the fact that the abutting property owners are now neither in favor nor in oooosition to the additional animals oermlt. I .,,.._· benislaw . · .. Mayor·· September 1~, 2013 ·· · . Departmeni of Community and Economic Developrrient .. . . ,C.E.'.'Chip"Vincerit, Administratof Kelly iind'Susan Salvatori 1315 Redrn~nd Place NE . Renton, WA98056 ·, . . . SUBJECT:. . Salvatori Additional Animals Permit . . · •·-LUA13°000673 AAP . . . ' . Dea(Mr.arid Mrs:_salvatori: ' This lett~r is. to informC y~u that the appeal ·peribd ended September s, 2Q13.fbr,the above referenced Additional AriimalsPerinitap'proval. No appeals were filed; therefore, ·. . \ ·,. . -. . . ' .. · , .... -. . , .. -'. ' .· . . . ' . . . . . . .. this decision is finaL lfVou have any qu_~stions regarding the· issued_Additional<A.nimals P~r~itPlease call me at' (425) 430:7382. • . • • . c . . • ·. . . . . • _Sin·cere y, · · Gerald Wasser. Ass~date}'lanner-.. .. cc:. ·,,._. Rento~ City Hall.,' Hiss South Grady Way , Renton, Washi~gton 98057., renionw~.gov . . . ' •• • .. ' ' •.. ·1.. . . •• . . • .• .~ .. ·.·c . Denislaw ' , _.·Mayor. · · . August 21,)013 . · · Depart,,;ent of.Comm~nity and Econbmic D!!velopment •.. . . . . . CE:''Chip"Viricent, Administrator· . ' Kelly and Susan Saivatori · .. 1i1sRedmond Pl~ceNE ·. Rentopn, Vl(A 98056 ~ .-. . SUBJECT: RECONSiDERATION REQUEST' ' ' ' .SALVA.TORIADDITIONf\L ANIMALS PERMIT LUA13~000673, AAp !;)ear Mr. a.nd Mi. Salvatori: . ' •,'• . . '-", .· ·, · .. This correspiindence i~ iri res po rise to yo·~r letter, d.a~ed Juiy 28; 2013; requesting · . . ·.· reconsideration of the'.denial of yot:ii'. Additional.Animals Pe'rmit application Which was ' • • , , .• • • • ' • • ', • , • •. I : • '.,•' ,, • ,· •. ;''• ' • . :i,~SL:Jed.'o~)91Y ~I 20,13., :·, . . ;. . · · -. -._.,' · · · · · r · • · • · · .' ·- . That deni.al was b~seci on obj~ttioris from neighboring j:,rop~rty ownerswho ha;e . withd~awn their objections. in a letter, dated Juiy 27, 2013,'those property owners, .. ,'' 'Aridrewand Sh~hida Hise/stat~ thatthey are n\,w neutral, :rieither o'ppos;d nor in fa~or ' ' 'ofthe additional animals permit .. Therefor~; your request for reconsideration is granted.: .and LU/i.13-000673,'.A.AP; Saivatb.ri Additional Anim~is Perrilit; is approved. This . . •. appr9val is reflected, iri the enclosed Additiorial Animals Perrnit. ' . . . . . . ' ' . . '····.· ... should ybuhave any que~tions; ple.ise cont~ct.Gerald Wasser;'Associate Planner at·. (425)43'0,7382 6r g~ass~r@renioriwigov. ' . . . ' . ·_.,·,__ : . ' ·-' '1 •. · • ' Sinc~refy, .·~······.·.··.·.·_.'o ..... •.f'·.( •.. ··~·~. 6 \J '--·, ~-.···· ' . . , .. ,. . --'-~.. ' :c:E. "Chip" Vincent ' ' ' CED Ad~inistr~tor · Enclosure: LUA13-00d'673, M,P . ' ' . , ~c: :_. · Afldr~~ ~·Shahida ~-ise:1 ~ariie.s 0f"Rec~~d . Gre'g _Eriti_erg, Party -~f R~c·ord·. · · · '"". --.. Renton '(ity Hali., 1055 South Grady Way.,. Ren~on,Washington 98057°,. ,;ntonwa.gov, ,· . . ., •. ·-.. . . . ~· . . . ' . '\'. -. ,· PLANNING DIVISION ADDITIONAL ANIMALS PERMIT DATE OF PERMIT ISSUANCE: August 21, 2013 PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT MANAGER: .OWNER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: DECISION CRITERIA: LUA13-000673 . Salvatori Additional Animals Permit Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner Kelly and Susan Salvatori 1315 Redmond Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Susan Salvatori 159 Vashon Pl NE Renton, WA 98059-5240 1315 Redmond Pl NE plicant is requesting approval of an Additional Animals Permit to a~vi:fef!Tlit' the keeping of five dogs where three household pets are allowed (RMC 4-4-0lOG.1). The dogs include: two Chihuahuas, one Dachshund, one mixed breed (mutt), and one Shitzu. All ofthe dogs weigh between 10 and 25 pounds each. The applicant states that the dogs are indoor pets. The rear yard of the 8,800 square foot property is enclosed by a six-foot high wood fence. The property is a corner lot in the Residential-8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zone. A denial of the additional animals permit was issued on July 5, 2013; the denial was based on a letter from abutting property owners describing excessive barking. The applicant, subsequently, requested reconsideration of the denial based on the fact that the abutting property owners are now neither in favor nor in opposition to the additional animals permit. The Planning Division Director shall review requests for Additional Animals Permits for compatiblity of the proposal with the surounding neighborhood. In order to determine that the site and facility will be adequate and to ensure the humane and appropriate care of the animals, the Planning Division Director may require that the property be inspected by an Animal Control Officer. Factors to be considered in determining compatiblity and adequacy are: ----~------··------i I ----··-·--·--J Page 1 of 4 DEPARTMENT OF (f"''\/IMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ~ PLANNING DIVISION ADDITIONAL ANIMALS PERMIT DATE OF PERMIT ISSUANCE: August 21, 2013 PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT MANAGER: OWNER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: DECISION CRITERIA: LUA13-000673 Salvatori Additional Animals Permit Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner Kelly and Susan Salvatori 1315 Redmond Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Susan Salvatori 159 Vashon Pl NE Renton, WA 98059-5240 1315 Redmond Pl NE The applicant is requesting approval of an Additional Animals Permit to allow the keeping of five dogs where three household pets are allowed (RMC 4-4-0lOG.1). The dogs include: two Chihuahuas, one Dachshund, one mixed breed (mutt), and one Shitzu. All of the dogs weigh between 10 and 25 pounds each. The applicant states that the dogs are indoor pets. The rear yard of the 8,800 square foot property is enclosed by a six-foot high wood fence. The property is a corner lot in the Residential-8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zone. A denial of the additional animals permit was issued on July 5, 2013; the denial was based on a letter from abutting property owners describing excessive barking. The applicant, subsequently, requested reconsideration of the denial based on the fact that the abutting property owners are now neither in favor nor in opposition to the additional animals permit. The Planning Division Director shall review requests for Additional Animals Permits for compatiblity of the proposal with the surounding neighborhood. In order to determine that the site and facility will be adequate and to ensure the humane and appropriate care of the animals, the Planning Division Director may require that the property be inspected by an Animal Control Officer. Factors to be considered in determining compatiblity and adequacy are: Page 1 of 4 City of Renton Department of Com ity & Economic Development Additional Animals Permit LUA13-000673 Salvatori Additional Animals Permit NO 1. Will the keeping of additional animals have an adverse effect on abutting or adjacent properties or cause ·a detriment to the community? Comments: The original denial of the Salvatori Additional Animals Permit was based on a letter from abutting property owners which described excessive barking. Those neighbors have since submitted a letter which states that they are neither in favor nor in opposition to the requested additional animals permit. -·-·------------------.. -··--·-------·------··---------------·-·"·-----·--·---··---- NO 2. Is there a past history of animal control complaints regarding animals kept by the applicant? Comments: City of Renton Animal Control has indicated that there is no past history of any complaints. ----·---------·-·------· YES 3. Do adequate and appropriate facility and rear yard specifications /dimensions exist that ensure the health and safety of the animals? Comments: City of Renton Animal Control conducted an inspection of the site on June 18, 2013 and found the subject premises has adequate ventilation, food storage, and waste management. YES 4. Are the animals' sizes, types, and characteristics of breed compatible with the adequacy of the site and facilities? YES 5. Is the animal waste product managed in a safe, clean and odor-free manner? Comments: City of Renton Animal Control conducted an inspection of the site on June 18, 2013 and found the subject premises has adequate ventilation, food storage, and waste management. YES 6. Is the request for additional animals compatible with the zoning classification of the premises on which the keeping of additional animals is to occur? - N/A 7. Keeping of Additional Large lot Animals Requirements: If the application is for keeping of additional large lot animals does the applicant provide a copy of the adopted farm management plan based on the King County Conservation District's Farm Conservation and Practice Standards? -·----·----------------------·-----------·-------------------·--------- N/A 8. Keeping of Additional Large Lot Animals Requirements: Is there adequate pasturage to support a greater number of animals? N/A 9. If the application is for animal foster care provider, has the applicant kept paperwork for all foster animals which states that the animals are foster animals from a sponsoring organization? (Such paperwork shall be provided upon request to City officials) N/A 10. Is the shelter location located a minimum of ten (10) feet from any property line and in the rear yard? (Note: Unless Planning Division determines that a side yard would be a better location.) -··---·-·-·---·'""'--~·--··-------·---·----=•-0--·-··---~··--0 ·--·----- Page 2 of 4 · City of Renton Department of Corr ity & Economic Development Additional Animals Permit LUA13-000673 Salvatori Additional Animals Permit 11. Is the subject lot smaller than one (1) gross acre in size? If so, are dog-runs, open-run areas and permanent/temporary kennel structures surrounded by a fence of adequate I height, located a minimum of ten {10) feet from any property line and in the rear yard? (Note: Unless Planning Division determines that a side yard would be a better location.) f Comments: An exiting 6-foot high fence surrounds the rear yard area and is located at I the property line. Abutting property property owners have stated that they are neither in favor nor in opposition to the requested additional animals permit. N/A 12. Is the subject lot larger than one (1) gross acre in size? If so, are dog-runs, open run areas and permanent/temporary kennel structures surrounded by a fence of adequate height, may be located closer than ten (10) feet from any property line and if the dog-run, open run areas and kennel structure is no closer than one hundred {100) feet tc any dwelling unit and the location is approved by the Planning Division. YES 13. Are all animals kept in such a manner so as not to create any objectionable noise, odor, annoyance, or become a public nuisance? Comments: Abutting property owners have stated that they are neither in favor nor in opposition to the requested additional animals permit. YES 14. Are animal and food wastes properly removed to keep the kennel free from the infestation of insects, rodents or diseases and from obnoxious or foul odors? Comments: City of Renton Animal Control conducted an inspection of the site on June 18, 2013 and found the subject premises has adequate ventilation, food storage, and waste management. CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Salvatori Additional Animals Permit, LUA13-000673, AAP, be approved because the property owners who initially expressed concern about excessive barking are now neither in favor nor in opposition to the additional animals permit. DECISION: The Salvatori Additional Animals Permit, LUA 13-000673 is approved. SIGNATURE & DATE OF DECISION : \) ' J c.-. z. 1...-.)4 August 21, 2013 0 C.E. "Chip" Vincent, CED Administrator Date Appeals of permit issuance must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, September 4, 2013, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, Page 3 of 4 City of Renton Department of Com ity & Economic Development Salvatori Additional Animals Permit Additional Animals Permit LUAB-000673 Reconsideration: Within 14 days of the decision date, any party may request that the decision be reopened by the approval body. The approval body may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the approval body finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension ofthe appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14-day appeal time frame. Expiration: An Additional Animals Permit shall be valid as long as the keeping of animals has not been discontinued for more than one year, the operator is in compliance with the City requirements and has not had the Additional Animals Permit and/or any related home occupation license revoked or renewal refused. In addition, all animals that are required to be licensed shall be individually licensed according to the regulations found in RMC 5-4, Animal Licenses. Failure to renew animal licenses as required in RMC 5-4 shall trigger review and/or revocation of the Additional Animals Permit. Page 4 of4 I r .... _ Kelly and Susan Salvatori 1315 Redmond PL NE Renton, WA 98056 The purpose of this letter is to formally request that the decision to grant the Additional Animals Permit for Kelly and Susan Salvatori be reopened and to present additional information that is relevant to this case. Let me start by providing some background. Susan and I moved to our current residence with our existing three (3) dogs in December 2012. The primary reason for the move was to acquire a bigger home so that Susan's mother, Betty Shockley, could move in with us. Betty is eighty-four (84) years of age and although she is self-sufficient in many respects, she needed some additional care due to her dementia. Betty has two (2) dogs of her own. Knowing that the City of Renton has a pet limit of three (3), Susan talked with a representative from the City of Renton and discovered that we could apply for an Additional Animals Permit to account for the five (5) dogs that we knew we would ultimately have. With the knowledge that we could be compliant with the City of Renton's requirements, we started our home search. Once we located our current home, Susan and I got in touch with the president of the home owners association, Greg Engberg, and informed him of our current situation, our interest in purchasing the home and to see if there would be any objections to having five (5) dogs in the neighborhood. At the time, Greg said he needed to think about it and so we gave him our contact number. About a week went by before we received a call from Greg who stated that as long as the City of Renton would allow five (5) dogs, he did not have any objections to us moving in. Upon receiving the good news, we went forward with purchasing our current home and had moved our belongings into the new home by January. At the start of February, we had settled in enough that we could move Betty in to live with us. We were still very busy with settling in to our new home so it wasn't until the end of May that we got around to applying for the Additional Animals Permit. The Public Notice was posted in June. After the fourteen (14) day comment period had elapsed, I called Gerald Wasser (on June 25th) to find the status of our permit request. He let me know that the permit was still under investigation but that one (1) neighbor did respond with a concern and Gerald sent me an e-mail with the responses received. Once we were aware of our neighbor's concern, Susan and I took the opportunity on June 26th to talk with Shihida and her partner Andrew Hise. During that conversation, we discovered Shihida was mainly concerned that adding two (2) additional dogs would add to the existing barking that could be heard. She was surprised to hear that we already had five (5) dogs and that they had been with us since the start of February 2013. Since we were now aware of their barking concern, we exchanged contact numbers and let both of them know that if they had any issues with barking to please contact us immediately and we would resolve it. In addition, I informed them that we had already talked with Greg Engberg about the neighborhood kids playing next to our fence line, which was causing our dogs to bark as well. All in all, it was a very positive meeting. C;l), Ji>.l' 0,<-'-'C. ,?~ cf;, ~v. "'"o On June 27'", I left a message for Gerald Wasser to let him know that we had talked wlft~hihida~Q.!1.9 ~<'.) ~ Andrew and that although I felt the issue had been resolved, to please contact them to gJ<1:\eir input.<,?{;> Two (2) weeks later, to our surprise, we received our denial letter for the Additional Animals P~?mit. Specifically, the letter included a statement from Shihida saying that the "barking still continues t;;'b'e~ll problem". q,., On July 241h, we took the opportunity to talk to Shihida and Andrew again to see if we had misunderstood their stance. Shihida informed us that her response was misrepresented in the letter from the city and that the barking had subsided to an acceptable level. Instead of being against our Additional Animals Permit, Shihida said that she was neither in favor nor in opposition. In short, the issuance of the Additional Animals Permit was denied due to "Attachment A", which refers to our neighbor's (Shihida Khan and Andrew Hise) concern over excessive barking. This concern has been addressed. On a final note, I would like to point out that no formal complaint has ever been filed with the City of Renton Animal Control for excessive barking. In addition, there are other dogs in our neighborhood which contribute to the barking that is heard. All of our dogs are small in-door dogs that are not left outside. Lastly, we ensure that the dog door to the backyard is in place when we are gone so that they cannot go outside and bark. Thank you for taking the time to review this letter. If you need any further information, please do not hesitate to contact either of us at the numbers provided below. Kelly Salvatori Phone: 425-235-4638 ~,-;:;;-~ Susan Salvatori Cellphone: 425-466-0470 ~~ ..• July 27, 2013 To whom it may concern, We are the neighbors at 1321 Redmond Pl NE. Previously we wrote in opposition of the additional animals permit. The situation has since improved, therefore we would like to amend the record to show we are neutral in our position -neither opposed nor in favor of the animal permit. Futhermore, the record indicates a phone conversation on July 5th -which was incorrectly documented. The conversation detailed that the situation had improved and that our position was neutral in the matter. We feel this should be noted and corrected in the record. Andrew & Shahida Hise 1321 Redmond PL NE -Renton;WA98056 DEPARTMENT OF Cl /IMUNITY AND . \ city.oflb. ~ .. --------===-u @1r·1 ,(()\'';;;\ · {/;. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT JS ~JJJ.. .. twJJll ·,?t PLANNING DIVISION ·. ADDITIONAL ANIMALS PERMIT DATE OF PERMIT ISSUANCE: July 05, 2013 PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT MANAGER: OWNER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: DECISION CRITERIA: LUA13-000673 Salvatori Additional Animals Permit Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner Kelly and Susan Salvatori 1315 Redmond Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Susan Salvatori 159 Vashon Pl NE Renton, WA 98059-5240 1315 Redmond Pl NE The applicant is requesting approval of an Additional Animals Permit to permit the keeping of five dogs where three household pets are allowed (RMC 4-4-0lOG.1). The dogs include: two Chihuahuas, one Dachshund, one mixed breed (mutt), and one Shitzu. All of the dogs weigh between 10 and 25 pounds each. The applicant states that the dogs are indoor pets. The rear yard of the 8,800 square foot property is enclosed by a six-foot high wood fence. The property is a corner lot in the Residential-8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zone. The Planning Division Director shall review requests for Additional Animals Permits for compatiblity of the proposal with the surounding neighborhood. In order to determine that the site and facility will be adequate and to ensure the humane and appropriate care of the animals, the Planning Division Director may require that the property be inspected by an Animal Control Officer. Factors to be considered in determining compatiblity and adequacy are: 1. Will the keeping of additional animals have an adverse effect on abutting or adjacent properties or cause a detriment to the community? Page 1 of 5 '4 City 'of Renton Department of Comn,_.,,ty & Economic Development Salvatori Additional Animals Permit Additional Animals Permit LUA13-000673 r Comments: Please note that two comment letters from neighboring property owners were received (see attachments). One letter (Attachment A) states the neighbor's opposition to the issuance of this additional animals permit. The neighbor states that at least one of the five dogs barks excessively. The City of Renton Animal Control has no record of formal complaints regarding excessive barking. Formal complaints concerning excessive barking may be filed with City of Renton Animal Control which will investigate complaints and take appropriate action. The second letter (Attachment B) from another neighboring property owner discusses 1 1 the history of the five dogs at the subject property and concludes that the neighbor is neither in favor or in opposition to this additional animals permit. However, this · 1 neighbor acknowledges that there is barking emanating from the backyard of the I subject property. An abutting neighbor (Attachment A), acknowledged in a telephone conversation, on July 5, 2013 with staff, that the applicant spoke with them about attempting to alleviate excessive barking. However, barking still continues to be a problem according to this neighbor. 2. Is there a past history of animal control complaints regarding animals kept by the applicant? Comments: City of Renton Animal Control has indicated that there is no past history of 1-------~_'.1.Y compl~~~~· -------·-·--- !YES 3. Do adequate and appropriate facility and rear yard specifications/dimensions exist that ! ensure the health and safety of the animals? i ! 1YES ! \ i iYES I I . i ' i Comments: City of Renton Animal Control has indicated that adequate ventilation, food storage and waste management are present at the subject site. City of Renton Animal Control conducted an inspection of the site on June 18, 2013 and ! found the subject premises has adequate ventilation, food storage, and waste I management. ·--- A-re the animals' sizes, types, and characteristics of breed compatible-with the adequacy I 4. 5. ofthe site and facilities? ! Is the animal waste product managed in a safe, clean and odor-free manner? ---1 Comments: City of Renton Animal Control has indicated that adequate ventilation, food i storage and waste management are present at the subject site. ! ' City of Renton Animal Control conducted an inspection of the site on June 18, 2013 and ·1, found the subject premises has adequate ventilation, food storage, and waste 1 management. j 1---. ·---------------------~ ------i IYES . 6. Is the request for additional animals compatible with the zoning classification of the / ; premises on which the keeping of additional animals is to occur? · I __ --_ .. _____ .. ______________ . _ .. _______________ .-----_J Page 2 of 5 City of Renton Department of Comr,. .,ty & Economic Development Salvatori Additional Animals Permit Additional Animals Permit LUA13-000673 7. Keeping of Additional Large Lot Animals Requirements: If the application is for keeping of additional large lot animals does the applicant provide a copy of the adopted farm management plan based on the King County Conservation District's Farm Conservation and Practice Standards? i ............... -....... ,,, ___ .,., _________ ,,___ ... .... --·-----·--·-·-·-·----.... ·-·--·--------·---------.. -1 :N/A 8. Keeping of Additional Large lot Animals Requirements: Is there adequate pasturage to i support a greater number of animals? J' ; ·-~-· ~--. ·-····-· -------·--·--···--···-· ---·-···-----·-·-----------·--------·-···· -· .. -··-----.---·"'---·-·----·----·-···--···---··-----······---------·--·-·-·-··" IN/A 9. If the application is for animal foster care provider, has the applicant kept paperwork forj all foster animals which states that the animals are foster animals from a sponsoring I I !N/A organization? (Such paperwork shall be provided upon request to City official~_) ____ _! 10. Is the shelter location located a minimum of ten (10) feet from any property line and in the rear yard? (Note: Unless Planning Division determines that a side yard would be a i better location.) · ' 11. Is the subject lot smaller than one (1) gross acre in size? If so, are dog-runs, open-run areas and permanent/temporary kennel structures surrounded by a fence of adequate height, located a minimum of ten (10) feet from any property line and in the rear yard? I (Note: Unless Planning Division determines that a side yard would be a better location.) Comments: An existing 6-foot high fence surrounds the rear y;ird area and is located at the property line. Neighboring property owners have stated that dogs on the subject property bark excessively when they are using their own abutting backyards (Attachments A and B ). N/A 12. Is the subject lot larger than one (1) gross acre in size? If so, are dog-runs, open run areas and permanent/temporary kennel structures surrounded by a fence of adequate height, may be located closer than ten {10) feet from any property line and if the I dog-run, open run areas and kennel structure is no closer than one hundred {100) feet tel' any dwelling unit and the location is approved by the Planning Division. ---·-·--·-·--. ·-· . --------·--, NO 13. Are all animals kept in such a manner so as not to create any objectionable noise, odor, II annoyance, or become a public nuisance? ___ ___) Page 3 of 5 ' City bf Renton Deportment of Comn,_.,,ty & Economic Development Salvatori Additional Animals Permit Additional Animals Permit LUAB-000673 Comments: Please note that two comment letters from neighboring property owners were received (see attachments). One letter (Attachment A) states the neighbor's opposition to the issuance of this additional animals permit. The neighbor states tliat at least one of the five dogs barks excessively. The City of Renton Animal Control has no record of formal complaints regarding excessive barking. Formal complaints concerning excessive barking may be filed with City of Renton Animal Control which will investigate complaints and take appropriate action . The second letter (Attachment B) from another neighboring property owner discusses the history of the five dogs at the subject property and concludes that the neighbor is neither in favor or in opposition to this additional animals permit. However, this neighbor acknowledges that there is barking emanating from the backyard of the subject property. An abutting neighbor (Attachment A), acknowledged in a telephone conversation, on July 5, 2013 with staff, that the applicant spoke with them about attempting to I alleviate excessive barking. However, barking still continues to be a problem according to this neighbor. i ···----...................... -........... -.............. ----·----··----····-·-·-·-----------.. ···-.. ----·------I ivES 14. Are animal and food wastes properly removed to keep the kennel free from the i infestation of insects, rodents or diseases and from obnoxious or foul odors? Comments: City of Renton Animal Control has indicated that adequate ventilation, food storage and waste management are present at the subject site. City of Renton Animal Control conducted an inspection of the site on June 18, 2013 and found the subject premises has adequate ventilation, food storage, and waste management. CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Salvatori Additional Animals Permit, LUA13-000673, request be denied because the additional animals would not be kept in a manner that prevents objectionable noise (Criteria 13) for the abutting property owners as documented in the attached comment letter and email. · DECISION: The Salvatori Additional Animals Permit, LUA 13-000673 is denied. SIGNATURE & DATE OF DECISION : ~ C.E. "Cliip" July OS, 2013. Date Page 4 of 5 l City of Renton Deportment of Cornn, •.. ty & Economic Development Salvatori Additional Animals Permit Additional Animals Permit LUA13-000673 Appeals of permit issuance must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on Monday, July 29, 2013, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, 425-430-6510. Reconsideration: Within 14 days of the decision date, any party may request that the decision be reopened by the approval body. The approval body may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the approval body finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14-day appeal time frame. Expiration: An Additional Animals Permit shall be valid as long as the keeping of animals has not been discontinued for more than one year, the operator is in compliance with the City requirements and has not had the Additional Animals Permit and/or any related home occupation license revoked or renewal refused. In addition, all animals that are required to be licensed shall be individually licensed according to the regulations found in RMC 5-4, Animal Licenses. Failure to renew animal licenses as required in RMC 5-4 shall trigger review and/or revocation of the Additional Animals Permit. Page 5 of 5 I June 11, 2013 Attention: Gerald Wasser Associate Planner Department of Community & Economic Development 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE: Salvatori additional animal permit/ LUA13-000673, AAP Susan Salvatori, 1315 Redmond Place NE, Renton 98056 Dear Mr. Wasser City Of R Ptannin enton g Division JUN 1. 7 2013 IPJ~~~UW'~llJJ I am writing regarding the additional animal permit request at the above residence, to express my serious concerns regarding the permit five dogs. My husband, Andrew Hise and I, Shahida Khan, live at 1321 Redmond Place NE, Renton, next door to the homeowners making this request. We never received any notice in the mail regarding their request. I happen to read the pink notice posted the telephone pole in our neighborhood. I was informed by the President of the Homeowner's Association we were supposed to receive a notice in the mail. Again, we did not received anything. Currently, these neighbors own three dogs and we think one in particular is constantly barking when placed outside. I don't know if it's all three dogs barking, or just one, but as soon as they are let outside they bark at children playing in the neighborhood or us sitting outside, trying to enjoy the sunshine on our patio furniture. Within minutes we have to go back in our home because the noise doesn't stop until they let the dog(s) back inside their home. Their backyard is approximately 700sq ft and so is ours. Our backyards are just not large enough for five dogs to run around in. In addition, the noise from the current three dogs I'm assuming will double with two additional dogs. I'm very concerned about the noise. I am asking you to please deny the request for five dogs. We have no children and no pets and can't imagine living next door to five dogs, when it's loud enough with three. We want to have the option to sit outside to enjoy what summertime has to ·otr~r, l<inger· than a few minutes, because of a dog that barks coristantly. · What steps need to be taken to assure we will be informed, appropriately, regarding these kinds of matters in the future? I am very concerned we were overlooked when we live next door to these people and are one of the two neighbors affected the most. Your diligence in these matters is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, ' ' Gerald Wasser From: Sent: Engberg, Gregory K <grego_ry.k.engberg@boeing.com> Monday, June 17, 2013 4:42 PM To: Gerald Wasser Subject: Salvatori Additional Animals Permit/LUA 13-000673,APP Jerry-I appreciate the return call earlier this afternoon and the opportunity to discuss the subject permit. As I noted, the backyard of the Salvatori's home is approximately 1,050ft2. The backyard butts up to my property line {3718 NE 13thPI) with exposure to my front door as well as my 81/2 year old daughter's bedroom. The Salvatori's have been upfront about the possibility of more than 3 dogs on their lot since they first considered the home for purchase. Prior to them buying the residence, they had asked to see the communities CC&Rs and asked what I thought about the additional animals. Because the dogs were described as in-door pets and of very small size, I couldn't see any significant issues. However, I said it was best'to go thought the city for proper recourse. The dogs are rarely seen. That said, one of the dogs has a propensity to bark at the slightest noise, whet.her one of the neighbors are leaving their house in the morning, the kids are outside playing in the street or simply sitting in your backyard having a conversation. I have made the recommendation to the Salvatori's that by possibly introducing the dogs to the neighborhood kids, this action might reduce the barking on one level. As for other sitµations that might cause the dog to bark, I don't have a recommendation. Therefore, it is my decision that I am neither in favor of or against the addition of two (2) additional dogs at the Salvatori residence. For me, it is the level of and frequency of barking that is of significant issue. Please add my name to the Party of Record. Greg Engberg 3718 NE 13th Pl Renton Wa 98056 425 277-2778 Thank you, Greg Engberg GAS Finance -Customer Support (206) 766-1082 M/S 2L-90 1 CitY·ofR Piannin. e_nton g D1v1sion JUN 1 7 2013 ij ~ rt; rg Urtrg ft)) Gerald Wasser From: Sent: To: Subject: .- Engberg, Gregory K <gregory.k.engberg@boeing.com> Monday, June 17, 2013 4:42 PM Gerald Wasser Salvatori Additional Animals PermiVLUA 13-000673,APP Jerry-I appreciate the return call earlier this afternoon and the opportunity to discuss the subject permit. As I noted, the backyard of the Salvatori's home is approximately 1,050ft2. The backyard butts up to my property line (3718 NE 13thPI) with exposure to my front door as well as my 81/2 year old daughter's bedroom. The Salvatori's have been upfront about the possibility of more than 3 dogs on their lot since they first considered the home for purchase. Prior to them buying the residence, they had asked to see the communities CC&Rs and asked what I thought about the additional animals. Because the dogs were described as in-door pets and of very small size, I couldn't see any significant issues. However, I said it was best to go thought the city for proper recourse. The dogs are rarely seen. That said, one of the dogs has a propensity to bark at the slightest noise, whether one of the neighbors are leaving their house in the morning, the kids are outside playing in the street or simply sitting in your backyard having a conversation. I have made the recommendation to the Salvatori's that by possibly introducing the dogs to the neighborhood kids, this action might reduce the barking on one level. As for other situations that might cause the dog to bark, I don't have a recommendation. Therefore, it is my decision that I am neither in favor of or against the addition of two (2) additional dogs at the Salvatori residence. For me, it is the level of and frequency of barking that is of significant issue. Please add my name to the Party of Record. Greg Engberg 3718 NE 13th Pl Renton Wa 98056 425 277-2778 Thank you, Greg Engberg CAS Finance -Customer Support (206) 766-1082 M/S 2L-90 1 • June 11, 2013 Attention: Gerald Wasser Associate Planner Department of Community & Economic Development 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE: Salvatori additional animal permit/ LUA 13-000673, AAP Susan Salvatori, 1315 Redmond Place NE, Renton 98056 Dear Mr. Wasser I am writing regarding the additional animal permit request at the above residence, to express my serious concerns regarding the permit five dogs. My husband, Andrew Hise and I, Shahida Khan, live at 1321 Redmond Place NE, Renton, next door to the homeowners making this request. We never received any notice in the mail regarding their request. I happen to read the pink notice posted the telephone pole in our neighborhood. I was informed by the President of the Homeowner's Association we were supposed to receive a notice in the mail. Again, we did not received anything. Currently, these neighbors own three dogs and we think one in particular is constantly barking when placed outside. I don't know if it's all three dogs barking, or just one, but as soon as they are let outside they bark at children playing in the neighborhood or us sitting outside, trying to enjoy the sunshine on our patio furniture. Within minutes we have to go back in our home because the noise doesn't stop until they let the dog(s) back inside their home. Their backyard is approximately 700sq ft and so is ours. Our backyards are just not large enough for five dogs to run around in. In addition, the noise from the current three dogs I'm assuming will double with two additional dogs. I'm very concerned about the noise. I am asking you to please deny the request for five dogs. We have no children and no pets and can't imagine living next door to five dogs, when it's loud enough with three. We want to have the option to sit outside to enjoy what summertime has to offer, longer than a few minutes, because of a dog that barks constantly. What steps need to be taken to assure we will be informed, appropriately, regarding these kinds of matters in the future? I am very concerned we were overlooked when we live next door to these people and are one of the two neighbors affected the most. Your diligence in these matters is greatly appreciated. r·t ·, ""' an (3 11-4 ~3 Andrew Hise ( 425) 269-9700 1321 Redmond Place NE, Renton 98056 I --~ ~ NOTICE Of APPLICATION A M11ter Appllc1tlcn h11 b•en fil•d and .. ,.pted with the Department cf community & Economic Development ~:1i,~ 1 ~ :..';';," 0 ~:.[Jfyjslo,, of th• Otv ol 11.onton. TM lolfcwln1 brl1!1y de,crlbu the appllcatlon and the nec .. ,ary DATE OF HOTIC£ OFAPPUCATJOH: June 3, lOlJ PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Satvotcrl Addltlon1I Animal, Permit/ lUA13·000673, AAP PROJECT DESCR!PTION: The 1pp~c1nt +, requestln1 approval cf 1n Addltlonal Anlm.ilJ Permit 10 permit the keeping cl five dog, where three hou,ehold pell are •llow•d IRMC 4-4-0lDG.1). The dogs Include': rwo Oilhu1hua,, one DaUi,hund, one ml,ed brred (mutt), and one Shlt1u. All cf the dogs welch ~twun 10 ind 25 pound, u~. The 1pplltanl >111u that the do111re Indoor pets. The rnry1,d of the 8,800 ,quue fool property ;1 endoHd by a six-foot high wood Ienco. The propertv Ii I ccrnor let In tho Roild•nt11I • a dwtllin1 unlll pu ,cre 111·8) ,one, PROJECT LOCATION: 1315 Redmoncl Pim, NE PUBUCAPPIIOVALS: Admlniltrat!ve Additk>o1IAnimali Review APPllCANT/PAOJECT CONTACT PERSON: Susan S1!vatorl PUBUCHEAIIING: ti/A Comment< on the 1bov1 1ppllc1tlcn mull be ,ubmltted In wrllln1 tc Gorald Winer, A11<od1te Planntr, Dtpa~mtnt of Commun)ty & Economic Dev1lopm1nt, 1D55 South Grady Way, ll1ntcn, WA 911057, by S:00 p.m. ""lune 11, 20IJ. ti you hive qunOons about this prop<1s.tl, er wish to be m1de a party ot record and receM! 1ddlUon11 not,fk.atlon tiy moll, contact the Prcjoct M1n1ger It 1425) 430.7382. Anyone who submlll wrlt!en commtn\1 will 1utomatlcall ~•• ~rtycf record ind will be notified cf any deci,ioncn thl> project. Y PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: May 28, 2013 NOTICE OF COMPt.m APPLICATION: June 3, 2013 If you would like to be m1de I Plrt'/ cf record to receive furthor lnfcrmatlon on \hi• proposed proJec~ complete !his form and return 10: cnyorRenion. CfD, Pllnnln1 OM,;cn. JOSS South G,-dyWay, Renton, WA 980S7. FIie Name/ No.: sar,11orl Addillonol Anlm11, Permit/ LlJA1Hl00673, AAP NAME:----------------------------- MAILINGAODRESS: _____ ~ _______ Clty/Stite/Zlp; ________ _ TEUPHONENO.: ------------ CERTIFICATION hereby certify that -~-,,">'t' were posted in conspicuous places or nearby the d Date: b /3 fu/3 STATE dF WA(HINGTON 55 COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that G na.l d VJ a,; s <L signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Date~''"~, 3 · '20{ 3 ___ .Jl,.1:J.L...J.<,A"----'(,"":lfl=tr""M""a"----------- ,#"°"',,. o..a!R 'll,11 Notary Publk in and for the State of Washington .:::-C,~,,~'"'"'''•• ,, : .:-''~ £XP1.t, ''1, l,1. = ,n-· .#' "'!!,.o ~.,',,,. ~ :: '.:~ '\~Rt' ~ '1, ~ ;: J:" ~:: O ~ 0 ':: , ... , :::. ..,,, ~ ::2 z • CJ ~ t-., -.,_ ~ o , ... n,E C) ~ ~ ~" '6""::~: ~ ,, P\J n." ,: ;!:: -z ,, s""'~--= ~ ,,,, ... ... .....:-ti;". -"1, '9,-_ '•"\''""''''~u\"-g ,,,, ~ re of"' ,.:::-''•• , ........... '"\\""'''' Notary (Print): H ,4 My appointment expires: A. iw<w: f:: ;;zq. JD/'.:/ --~'-'""u~ .... ~ ..... __ .;;.;:_..1.,,1-"'""'""-',_ ________ _ •' CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNTY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 3rd day of June, 2013, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter and Notice of Application documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Susan Salvatori Applicant/Contact 300' Surrounding Property Owners See attached .Ah,.,111~ "''"""""•• (Signature of Sender): ~'°" ~·· -~ ... ,, ) () = 1"' 'I),,~ STATE OF WASHINGTON = p-~ \ :: (10,~t,, ~ ' ~ ~ ) ss i .••• ~ \_ "V}...B.29.\~ E .,. 111111, .: COUNTY OF KING ) i "\ ~Ol,:~ I I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker 11,;t Ott W § signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act f~ltti\j\\~~~purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: fr4'.e .~ ~0/3 Notary ~and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) : __ __,,H.!....<.JA'-".---'-/,"-'rr,LI<ak""-'ef"-------------- My appointment expires: A-I :, ,..., ao1r~ "';J (,(_ S' 1 v<-'4 ( .y Project Name: Salvatori Additional Animals Permit - ·Project Number: : LUAB-000673, AAP . ---·- ' . DALPAY PROPERTIES LL C PO BOX 2436 RENTON, WA 98056 NGUYEN DANNY XUAN 3710 NE 12TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 LE CU ONG Q+ THANH HOANG NGUYEN 1212 REDMOND AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 SHOYCHIN VADIM+ALLA 1248 REDMOND PL NE RENTON, WA 98056 WEEDMAN BROCK B+DARLENE M 1300 REDMOND PL NE RENTON, WA 98056 JUCO ALEXANDER +ABIGAIL 1301 QUEEN AVE NE RENTON, WA 98055 WONG KAHSOON 3818 NE 12TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 ENGBERG GREGORY & MEEGHAN 3718 NE 13TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 HOLZGRAF ROBERT W 3819 NE 14TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 VARSHAY LIBBY M 3808 NE 14TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 POWERS DAVID K 3722 NE 12TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 HARRIS EDWARD J PO BOX 909 PRESTON, WA 98056 NGUYEN BINH+HUYEN 1211 REDMOND AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 ALLEN BRETI M+ALLEN RENEE 1218 REDMOND AVE NE #6 RENTON, WA 98056 SEGUR RICHARD H 1216 QUEEN AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 MANIKHOTH THOMAS+ANN 3717 NE 13TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 MUSCAT JAMES P 1308 QUEEN AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 HUANG DONGDONG 3813 NE 14TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 GONZALEZ JOHN A+SHANNON M K 3820 NE 14TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 NGUYEN THONG+DAI LE 1414 QUEEN AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 WERTH MICHAEL l+C DORIS L WERTH 2714 NE 12TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 · HOUT VERONICA 3702 NE 12TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 BEERS FRANCES 1210 QUEEN AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 JUBRAN SUHAIL H 1217 REDMOND AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 MCFARLAND LORI B 1300 QUEEN AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 NA MICHAEL K 3711 NE 13TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 PEREZ KATHLEEN R+LARRY R 24814 SE. 416TH ST ENUMCLAW, WA 98022 DESRANLEAU MARCEL A 3807 NE 14TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 MAHAN ERIK N 3814 NE 14TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 KUNIGK DOMINIK OLIVER+MICHE 15236 NE 13TH PL #2401 BELLEVUE, WA 98007 DAVIS FRED S 3815 NE 14TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 NGUYEN HANH H 1315 REDMOND PL NE RENTON, WA 98056 BANH HUNG+HA NU 3802 NE 14TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 YEE GEORGE HON 3803 NE 14TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 REED WILLIAM C+REED GINA 3712 NE 13TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 AKERS KRISTINA L , 1324 QUEEN AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 CHOW ROBERT 7436 S 114TH ST SEATILE, WA 98178 WEIGEL DENNIS + VIVIAN 16853 SE 112TH ST RENTON, WA 98059 BYRAM MARK A+LINDA 1306 REDMOND PL NE RENTON, WA 98056 COFFMAN MARISSA 3609 NE 14TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 GEM SUNSET LLC 16834 SE 43RD ST ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 LE JENNIFER ANH 1318 REDMOND PL NE RENTON, WA 98059 MORTENSON JOEL+HANH 1312 REDMOND PL NE RENTON, WA 98056 PRATI ALVIN C 1303 REDMOND PL NE RENTON, WA 98056 GARVIN NATHANIEL C 3624 NE 14TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 TURNBULL PETER D+JOAN E 1316 QUEEN AVE NE RENTON, WA 0 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Divisio.n of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the appllcation and the necessary Publlc Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPUCATION: June 3, 2013 PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Salvatori Additional Animals Permit/ LUAB-000673, AAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of an Additional Animals Permit to permit the keeping of five dogs where three household pets are allowed (RMC 4-4-0lOG.1). The dogs include: two Chihuahuas, one Dachshund, one mixed breed (mutt), and one Shitzu. All of the dogs weigh between 10 and 25 pounds each. The applicant states that the dogs are Indoor pets. The rear yard of the 8,800 square foot property is enclosed by a six-foot high wood fence. The property is a corner lot in the Residential -8 dwel!ing units per acre (R-8) zone. PROJECT LOCATION: 1315 Redmond Place NE PUBLIC APPROVALS: Administrative Additional Animals Review APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Susan Salvatori PUBLIC HEARING: N/A Comments on the above appllcation must be submitted In writing to Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner, Department of Community & Economic Development, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 p.m. on June 17, 2013. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager at (425) 430-7382. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: May 28, 2013 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: June 3, 2013 If you wou)d like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED, Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Fite Name/ No.: Salvatori Additional Animals Permit/ LUAB-000673, AAP NAME:------------------------------------ MAILING ADDRESS: ________________ City/State/Zip:----------- TELEPHONE NO.: --------------- Denis Law Mayor June 3, 2013 Susan Scilvatori .· 1315 Redmond Place NE Renton, WA 98056 Department of Community and Ecoromic Development C.E."Chip"Vin.ce·nt, Admihisirator SUBJECT: Salvatori Additional Animals Permit LUA13a000673, AAP Dear Ms. ,Salvatori:. The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determin~d that the subject appljcation is complete according to the submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for -. . . -' . . . ' . review . . The foUowing is a brief summary of what will occur arid what needs to be completed.· pdor t6 approval of your application: A Public Notice will be se_nt to all property owners within 300 feet of your property; this public notice will allow the public to comment o'n the proposed Additional .L\nihials P~rmit. There is a 14-day period allowed for comments -'to be submitted to the Planning Division.· · . . . . . . " City of Renton Animal Control will ne~d to inspect the property to ensure the living . coriditi.ons of the animals comply with curr~nt _codes. Animal Control will contact you . ,within the nextfourt~en (14) days to'schedule an inspection at your convenience. · . . ' ' . . . . ,· . ' .· . ·. At the conclusion.of the com merit period and fallowing the inspecti;n by Animal • Control, the Plannin.g Director will make a determi~ation concerning the Additional Animals Permit application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7382 if you have questions.· Sincereiy, ·_ .. ······.··~~ Gerald C.. Wasser ·· . . Associate. Planne.r cc: Animal Control . -.. Renton City H;II • ·, 055 South Grady Way •·Renton_, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT A[D)[D)~l~O~Al A~~MAlS IPIE~M~l AIP!Pl~CA1.fl~~~'1ton . 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 g Division Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 www.rentonwa.gov MAY 2 8 201J ALL REQUESTED ITEMS MUST BE PROVIDED IN ORDER TO PROCESS THIS APPLIW!N A fee of $Sl.SO is required at the time of application submittal. «';~g~~/Q) 1. Property Address: /3 f'::> '1<£.QMO ("\ 0 :YL . Al-~, Zip Code: vj&:)'5t:c 2. Property Owner's Name:~ 'Sci\\lQ,-j-o rj Daytime Phone: c_/-25~ '-Jb3</ 3. Pet Owner's Name (if other than above): _________ Daytime Phone:~ 2S · ~' 4~'? 4. Site Plan: Please provide four 14) copies of a fully-dimensioned site plan drawn at a scale of 1"=10' or 1" = 20' (or other scale approved by the City) showing the following: o Date, scale and north arrow (oriented to the top of the paper/plan sheet) o Subject property with all property lines dimensioned o Location of existing driveways, alleys, and streets abutting the subject property • Public improvements (i.e. sidewalks) adjacent to the subject line o Location of existing and proposed fencing, hedges, or retaining walls o Parking areas, driveways, and existing easements • On-site trees, topographic features or other natural features relevant to proposal o Location of proposed animal shelter(s) on property. Indicate distance in feet between shelter(s) and lot lines 5. Description of facility where animals will be kept (include dimensions): .Tr> CXX) rL. pt?.1S' 2 7 0 0 ~ R:x)t-\-TO M-e._., 6. Description of fence surrounding shelter (type, height):._...,Co=-_._fcct-=--='---'Sl-vr----r-c-C>_ud __ --'- W oacf r-€/\nce_ 7. Farm Management Plan (needed only for the keeping of horses, llamas, donkeys, or cows). 8. Description of Animals: Breed: 2-CJ-+i I cto.ll1 Number: $ Type (ex. cat, dog): Weight: __;;d=.,:CGS:;..;:,;__. __ cw. ~ 1 o-tv 2s J?Ou nC:6' I M I x._ M u..--tt- I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington, that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true, correct, and complete and that the applicable requirements of the City of Renton will be met. If the applicant is not the property owner, please attach the property owner's signed authorization to apply for this permit. Applicant Signature: :8h0?::::k--~ Date: _..?'--·--"-2.'6-"-., ........ J-=-3,- H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Additional Animals Application.doc 04/12 :.wll~ ,. - ':/,,,- ~~-:.. 7 +,.,,. :;(;; 'i \(CJ ~"'.'--~ f ' {'3-30760{112 -. ir :Sm: PLAN City of Renton Print map Template • ,-·"::::--= """._.,,.--.,-;;,::;;:--~; --,-~423,C~S.f:J~-~ """.~. ~ • .1 •• '"j , . , . ~-: .:-~ l~,'.· -~ -,, ' ·-. / 0· -_c..~:_:,..:, c~ ;t-~;-Ji?~,1] ·, 3.;,0t8f1t·,(;-;:@ -·-J -.,. ' __ ,,-,<) ~r-~-,,~.i~ ,, ---~~ ---· -I " . ' . I .,. - -,-'''"'! r, . ~ -: ; -, _f.''.'i n ---~- l~_ .. J : ,,_· ~ ·-. -'· ' "'7J _, .. } •• , 4 ., .• ,,,_-l q J-,071300070 ~ ' ·-- -. ,, " ' ·-: --7" i t: ~?; f_~on ,~-:·_,,,.,. Legend Jurisdiction Boundaries iMl Other L,." [] City of Renton Addresses [J Parcels Overlay Districts Auto Mall A Auto Mall B O Employment Area vaney :'.'J City Center Sign Regulation Area 0 Urban Design Distnct A 0 Urtlan Design District B [] Urban Design District C E3 Urban Design District D v<·· . f fi J ___ ,--1~;, ',p "' t,+ _ •.• ' "':'-d ..::ti L -· ~ ;, : U ' ' , } l-: k~--· -:~ -,--c--";J ' "7 .. •',;, ·-"~~ -r~ ' C . .-.u'}'._ :\71,, ""t· ¥: ~ ~}. t:ol we~ .><.>< :: ;1,, ' . , " m~w-r~ • 7'.~ -i :- _,,,.,,-., .. ·- ' /~ & r-~-3307800~;,.g ( .• ," 330780006.Q.,;, ' : j\"~_-__ /:i " , t -~~'', ti ---J 26 0 13 26 WGS _ 1984_ Web_ Mercator _Auxiliary_ Sphere Feel -' . 1- Information Technology • GIS RentonMapSupport@Rentonwa.gov 05/28/2013 --\ . \1 '• ''· . ' ~ { . . . ~ : t\~-;,;-_ ' -' ' \I;: -. ,--: ,_ . \. ----.J, ,,' . • .. _· -• " .. _'..~---~-_:·_-~-. -'· . ~ . _,_ ., -" . ~ --. --~-- ---c· -- •' City of Renton Planning Division MAY 2 8 2013 ~yg;; ~ 1e.DW ~ {Q) 0 1:309 is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or _may n_ot be -~ity of -e·'ll'il O· n -{{/'..~ This map is a user generated static output from an lntemet mapping site and 11 . R-: -r-···· ... ---_ . .: accurate. current, or otherwise reliable. ll. Ji. '<4.:,_y THIS MAP IS NOTTO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION Finance & IT Division RECEIPT EG00008986 REFE BILLING CONTACT SUSAN SALVATORI 159 VASHON PL NE RENTON, WA 98059-5240 RENCE NUMBER FEE NAME LUA 13-000673 PLAN -Additional Animals Technology Fee Printed on: 5/28/2013 Prepared By: Laureen Nicolay TRANSACTION TYPE Fee Payment Fee Payment Transaction Date: May 28, 2013 City of Rsnton Planning Division MAY 2 8 2013 PAYMENT METHOD AMOUNT PAID ~redit Card $50.00 icredit Card $1.50 SUB TOTAL $51.50 TOTAL $51.50 Page 1 of 1