Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 1~ * ~ ~ ,. "I -. "' ; ii1 0 m "' 0 r ~ z ~ z tit· c., ~ •. )> • :IJ ~ •o I ffi =; m 0 c! :IJ )> r "' ii1 "(J i; z ' ' ' ' ' ' ' • 11 " ' !!:!i f ~:i )Is !":!•" ' ,- DI.! I~ i 111'9 I i I ' I I l I z 0 ~ m r m < ~ 0 z :•, --~r'----,,r.=i " " " " " " " " " " " : :e----11---111 " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " :: " " " " " " " " iii'--''--, ,,,--~-..--11hn " " " " " " " 11, " " " " , H " " " ---e "' " m m r ':11 ~ 0 z " " " "Irr-==~ " " " ' ::>'-""==a "'-----j_j_ " " " " " " :' ' ' " " " " " " " " H " " " " ----e iii ' i i'----~.11-----'--'--j: II " " " " " " "'----~q.------l " ". " " " :: " " ' ii' 11l ~ "' !~ \~ m r ~ =l 0 z I HARPER ENGINEERING BUILDING ADDITION 700 SN 7TH S1!EET RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 n n :n m ~· ;~ z -~~ ~i ~~ H l Ef m;Ji i ':li :0 " @ I~ ' I l I ! • ' I ·-. I J t ' ' ' I -·······.,$ ) I •. U r11 --- I I i I I I I I I I I ' I I l~ ~~-, •Iii ' /ii ' I ,. ... loli~\ PPP-SS-TTTT HARPEFt e.lGINEERINO AD0010N 700 SW 7TH STREET RENTON, WASHNGTON I I I I \ \ I I / ~ I --- I II I l:l k g I ~ I ! I i ' > ln !;; ,~ ·~ ~ !m ,~ ~ ,!:1 z I I ! i ;R CITY OF RENTON ..... 14131 PPP-SS-TTTT HARPER ENaNEER!NG AOCmON 700 SW 7TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON r rr 11 1111 m X ; C 0 0 z ~ ~ JI? ~ z ,' . 10 ml ''I I! 0 • ' > io .~ lo ,~ ·~ ,m '~ !@ I ' • ' I r ' i ac.E. J:,s NO 16585 """''600>,\10$1<1-\,0$50-_,,., eR CITY OF RENTON =JI~ ~ ;"------- /~ '- ! ( I f I ' J I I I I I I ....... o.s, HARPER ENGNEEFIING ADOl110N 700 SW 7TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON i " ' ... ""i r-20· +- •i 1~ ! II 11 111 lb< • m r '/,,: • I ~ -r: I : / ,_ '-· 1--, "_;__-:,_. -,I ® ;R CITY OF RENTO;\' .,...,1!9.ll HARPER BONEERNG ACOITlON 700 SW 7TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON WATERPlAN ' ' I I I I ,1 I ·1 \ i ) I I J L___J ~ ) ( "'"" 10911 PPP-SS-TTTT HARPER ENGINEEAINO ADOITION ' 700 SN 7TH STREET RENTON. WASHNOTON ~ I ·- ' ·'--- rr r11 I ii I ~ i ! ! I§ ~ I~ m i '~ jm c~ Oz ' ~ ' 0 ' • • Ii • !~ i 1m1 I ~,:1 11· ~ i -1n. g ~ I!\~ ~ ~ii )i I~ i~ iii l' ,i • ' B.C.E. JOB NO. 16585 ,.,,ec,,--.,,.,...,,. .... ...,.\,...,;-u ... ,.,.,,. .... -:11,,no,, •·si .. """'" ·,. -""'· ---- ~ CITY OF RENTON B.C.E. JOB NO. 16585 ,..,,,\,,lOOO.\lOffl~, ..... ._, ... "".,..._.,/W,. .. NO ... $o,lo,1". ,· l&llECL ""'' ---- ,,,,.,.9,11 HARPER ENGINEEFUNG ADD!TJON 700 SH 7TH STIEET RENTON, WASHNGTON * CITY OF RENTOl' DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: December 2, 2015 To: City Clerk's Office From: Sabrina Mirante Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office Project Name: Harper's Engineering LUA (file) Number: LUA-14-000454, ECF, SA-A Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Jill Ding Acceptance Date: April 21, 2014 Applicant: Todd Schutz, Craft Architects Owner: Harper Engineering Contact: PID Number: 1823059270 ERC Determination: DNS-M Date: May 19, 2014 Anneal Period Ends: June 6. 2014 Administrative Decision: Approved with Conditions Date: May 23, 2014 Anneal Period Ends: June 6. 2014 Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Anneal Period Ends: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Approval for the addition of 8,312 square feet including a 5,660 square foot first floor addition and a 2,652 square foot second story addition. The proposed addition would result in the removal of 22 parking stalls and the replacement of 14 parking stalls, resulting in a net loss of 8 parking stalls for a total of 84 parking stalls available on the project site. The project site is located in the Medium Industrial (IM) zone. Access to the site is proposed via existing driveways off of SW 7th Street. The project site is located within a seismic hazard area. Location: 700 SW 7th Comments: ERC Determination Types: DNS -Determination of Non-Significance; DNS-M -Determination of Non-Sionificance-Mitioated: DS -Determination of Sionificance. ADVISORY NOTES TO APP .. ;ANT LUA 14-000454 Application Date: April 07, 2014 Name: Harper Engineering Expansion of Site Address: 700 SW 7th St Renton, WA 98057-2919 f:r=~~ V:fu:j/ PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Version 1 I June 06, 2014 . Fire Review • Building Comments .· . · ','.,' :'-:<: ,::-, , ,' ·.··· .Contact: Corey Thomas I 425-430-7024 I cthomas@renlonwa.gov Recommendations: Environmental Impact Comments: 1. The fire impact fees are applicable at the rate of $0.08 per square foot of manufacturing area. Fees are paid at time of building permit issuance. Code Related Comments: 1. The preliminary fire flow requirement is 2,250 gpm based on a fully fire sprinklered building. A minimum of three fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the proposed building and two hydrants within 300 feet. Existing hydrants are adequate. 2. The existing fire alarm and fire sprinkler system are required to be extended into the proposed addition. Separate plans and permits are required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for review and permitting. The proposed building addition appears to be covering the existing fire sprinkler supply main, this is prohibited by code and the main shall be relocated prior to the addition construction. 3. Existing fire department apparatus access roads are adequate. 4. Applicant shall submit a completed Hazardous Material Inventory Statement prior to building permit issuance. Use of city form or approved equivalent is required. 5. An electronic site plan is required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for pre fire planning purposes prior to occupancy of the buildinq. ·contact: Cyndie Parks I 42S.430C7$l!f:iicparks@rentonwa.gov Engineetilia Review Comments . > • i:/ Contact: Jan Illian I 425-430· 7216 I jillian@rentonwa-.gov: Recommendations: I have reviewed the application for Harper Engineering at 700 -SW 7th Street and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER Water service is provided by the City of Renton. SEWER Sewer service is provided by the City of Renton. STORM There are storm improvements in SW 7th Street and a detention and water quality vault on site. STREETS There are frontage improvements in SW 7th Street. CODE REQUIREMENTS Water 1. The project is within the City's water service area in the Downtown 196 hydraulic pressure zone. 2. There is an existing fire line and double detector check valve assembly (DDCVA) in a vault serving the fire sprinkler system to the existing building. 3. There is a 1 1/2 inch domestic water meter serving the existing building at 700 SW 7th Street. 4. A system development fee for water will be owed if the size of the existing domestic water meter increases or additional meters are added based on the proposed expansion. Sanitary Sewer 1. There is an existing 8 inch sewer main in SW 7th Street. There is a side sewer serving the existing building. 2. A system development fee for sewer will be owed if the size of the existing domestic water meter increases or additional domestic meters are added based on the proposed expansion. Storm Drainage 1. Drainage plans and a drainage report was submitted Barghausen Engineers. The project is exempt from all drainage review requirements. 2. A Construction Stonmwater Permit from Department of Ecology is required if clearing and grading of the site exceeds one acre. Ran: December 02, 2015 Page 1 of 2 ADVISORY NOTES TO AF LUA 14-000454 ICANT PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Version 1 I June 06, 201 Engineering Revie\ilCommentsc • C<i~tiic:t: Jan Hlian}425•430-7216 I jillian@ rentonwa,gc 3. Surface Water System Development fees of $0.491 per square foot of new impervious surface will apply. This is payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. Transportation 1. Existing right of way width in SW 7th Street fronting the site is 80 feet. SW 7th Street is classified as a Minor Arterial. To meet the City's complete street standards, street improvements including an 8 foot planter strip and 8 foot sidewalk are required to be constructed in the right of way fronting the site per City code 4 6 060. Dedication of 8 feet of right of way will be required. Improvements for this section of SW 7th are currently under review by the transportation department. This is a designated trail corridor. Applicant is encouraged to submit a letter requesting a modification to the new street standards since there is an existing planting strip and sidewalk fronting the site already. 2. Street improvements are exempt for new construction or additions with a valuation of less than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). 3. Traffic impact fees per additional generated daily trip may be assessed as determined by the ITE trip generation manual. 4. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. Any new services shall be installed underground. General Comments 1. All construction utility permits for utilities, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. Any proposed rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height will require a separate building permit and special inspection. 3. Se arate ermits and fees for water meters, side sewers, and backflow devices are re uired. Ran: December 02, 2015 Page 2 of STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on May 23, 2014. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $94.50. ,,.Y nda M. Mills Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter Subscribed and sworn to me this 23rd day of May, 2014. z 'y~kLc...., _ _,,, () S'uYoiL,z '- Kathleen C. Sherman, Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Buckley, Washington ~"'""'"''\w,,,. $',..._, \;:.~ 6. &. r,~''" ~ "<"'v~ ........ ,,,\\\\\\1111 ly~ '11 ff;,;; .,;/';_<;,S10N "''!•,,, ~ \ E."l"'~,:! oTA '1"",<::,111 "'?~ i ::cfO ~ ii>~ '1'.>'1-"V ~ ,. ;::o ft\~ Z ~ :;. ~ -. -(/)~ :::: ~ ~ .... .,. ~~.() :::: ~ <P ~ ll9L\V E .:: 1::.>.'I, </. =~= \ 111-'1,,11 , 19. ~ '<> _,,.-"',._o ff II/I($" 011\Hi\\\\''-'''~C, ~ ,,,, 10 \/VASI'~ ,,""° 111 ,,, \\\\\\\\\\\\'-'''\: CITY OF RENTO'.\ NOTlet:m E:\VIR0:\\1 F.NTA I. DETERMl:\ATION E:\VIRO:-.~tENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RE:\TON, WASHINGT01' The Environmemat Review Committee has issued a Determi- nation of Non-Significance Miti- gated (DNS M) for the following project under the authority of the Renllln municipal ,;,:ode. Harper Engineering Expansion LLJAl4000454 Location: 700 SW 7th St Ad- ministrative Site Plan Review for the addition of 8,3 ! 2 square feet. Proposed addition would result in a net loss of 8 parkmg stalls for a total of 84 parking stalls on the proje<.:t site. l"he project site is located in the Medium Industrial (IM) zone Access to the site is proposed via existing driveways off of SW 7th Street. No <.:rit1cal areas have been identified on the project site Appeals of the D'.'IS-1\'I must be filed in \\'riting on or before 5:00 p.m. on June 06, 2014 Appeals musl be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner e/o City Clerk, City of Renton, I 055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Appeals to the I ]earing Ex.iminer arc governed by RMC 4-8-1 l 0 and more information may be obtamed from the Renton City Clerk's Office, 425-430-6510 Published in the RenlOn Rcporler on May 23, 2014. :#1056963. OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSIJ.,I.NCI: OF A DffiRMINATION Of NON-SIGNlflCANCE· MITIGATED (ONS.M] romo TO NOTIFY INTER5ml PEllSON5 Of /1,/1 fMVIAONMENTl\!.ACTIOff l'ROJIIC:TN""'E: ii.rpen~"CAddldon PROJKTMlMIEII, l!IAa«ll><S< 1.C>CA11""'' 11>0<W?"><,-WA'90'I• DUalPTION: -•ppkant k nquost;,,cAa .. -..--PII•""""'"'" fwtho..Wltlo« of I.JU..,.,..-,°"""""', 5,i&Q >II~ -flm -..i.nt!on ,nd , Us:.l ,. .. ,.. -._...i na,y ---•oddltionwauld .... ltin!ho-lof:z:tpor'<l<lc ...... ...i .... ,...i-.....o11A .,.... ..... ,i,. .... 1t1n&f,,..,....,..,.,..i. ....... rw,U1Wot .. _,.., .. , .... .,,""""'pn,t0<t*a. Thopro)«< .... kloalodiothoM.......,~INl..,...._Amm~U..._io...,.......U.odo!!Rld-.Y, olflof<W1'hkrNt.llle"""9d .... d,i...c.dwl!NnaH ...... _'"4 __ TM~ CTY 0~ l\afTON [NV1RotjMUfTl\l. ~[VlfW COMt,<fTTEI: (:ERC) HAS omRMll'IED TIIAT'™E PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT KAVE A 5JGNlfKNlT AOYl:R.l.E IMPACT OJ'< THE ENYIRO,'UdEMT. p.p-1• oftl,o .........,....,nt,,i <1.torminatlon murtl>oftlod!nwl'fllilon 0<bo!,:,co S:OOp.ra.onl•""'-lD1~, t 111nhor wl1li tM '*!"In!!:! 1H will',; tlurln1 Eu"'it>A<, cty of Re<Jton. toss 5ol.nll o. ... it,way, Ron!on, WA 9.op, Apf><lllr.1o!ho1lwr4norot0 ,......-'oyCtydl ~4-&-UO'°"d l.damlnlo<i roprdl,,..ta, •ppol pr<>CMI may baobt,lnod r,.,.., tll• Rtntoa otJ oork', Offlco.14l!il '1B-i510. If THE ENVlWNM,NTI\!. Dffil\MIN,1,00N IS Al'PE,t,UD, A PUWC HE,t,RING W!Ll IE SET AND AU. PAAT!ES PLEASE INaUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CAWNG FOR P!IOPfR flLE 1DENT1RCAT10N. CERTIFICATION I, A?f;_f14 (n}, d::::;;t@(!J . hereby certify that 3 ~ were l)Sted in _3__ conspicuous places or nearby the des copies ofthe above document · ed property on Date: 5 -2'2 -ft-/ STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Signed: 55 I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that A(\.:;:(_\ e e--\ t,J .-dr > \--r,,M signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/thei;e and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ,,,,,\\\\11, Dated:,'' '{ Notary (Print): My a ppo in tm e nt expires_: __ -L.4+"-klj""_+-~""''..i.f:::_-"d"-'J.1., 1 ---"c).D""'--ls..::'JJ_ ___ _ CITViQF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 22 day of May, 2014 I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing SEPA determination documents. This information was sent to: Agencies See Attached Todd Shulz Applicant Harper Engineering Owner (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON ----~~f_A.Ai(L..jlJ.;:'..!,J.C:...,L\il._\,.~!.,::::+-+-------:,_._"'~N~\\\\\ I 11 ~" ~ Poi.!•, ..§' ~'1 ry~'", ) ss ff~,,i:>IJ\\ -o'"' , COUNTY OF KING ) :" , °'-, -~ \ '(I')\ .. C, ~~ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Sabrina Mirante * l,,,11 e."•\.\1,.. O signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act fo('~5'ti~~~";poses mentioned in the instrument. :,, WASY'-' Dated: /\/1':j 2 "2/ ;!.01'-f Notary (Print): ___ -'t\'-'-"'oc;l~-"'+-.-7,_,,=\A""i"'<""ACc.;,...5----------- My appointment expires: ...,, q -, ' ·. ..,__,;; le-°' ) o<-0 q Harper Engineering Addition, ECF, SA LUA14-000454 template -affidavit of service by mailing All3/\V·09-008-l WO)".{JaAl!"MMM Todd Schutz Craft Architects 2505 Third Ave, Suite 324 Seattle. WA 98121 llfdn-dod p.1oqaJ a1 Jal~AijU ap uye a.1mpe4 e1 , zandaH Harper Engineering 700 SW 7TH RENTON. WA 98057 f w,a6p3 dn-dOd asodxo l ~ au11 tiuoJe puaa iuawa0Je4J apsuas T ' I I I @09lS@All3/\V ,irnqe6 .. , Zi>S!l!l() Ja1ad 11 sau>e1 sai.ianbq~ @0915 aie1dwa1 @,IJ•AY•n 51aqB1 @l~'-11 AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology** WDFW -Larry Fisher* Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept * Environmental Review Section 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box47703 Issaquah, WA 98027 !~ 39015 -172"' Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region* Duwamish Tribal Office* Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program* Attn: Ramin Pazooki ' 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172"d Avenue SE J PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers* KC Wastewater Treatment Division* Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Gretchen Kaehler Attn: SEPA Reviewer i Ms. Shirley Marroquin PO Box48343 f PO Box C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Boyd Powers*** Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section -Attn: Tim McHarg Attn: Jack Pace 35030 SE Douglas St. #210 Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Snoqualmie, WA 98065 12835 Newcastle Way, Ste 200 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98056 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City ofTukwila Senior Environmental Planner . Kathy Johnson, Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official " Gary Kriedt 355 110'" Ave NE . 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Mailstop EST llW Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98004 Seattle Public Utilities Jailaine Madura Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 .. PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. **Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov ***Department of Natural Resources is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice the following email address: sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov template -affidavit of service by mailing Denis Law c· f -~M=ayor -----•. rti . : .. ··.::-f 1 1 f1.?li ·r-:· f(-.':.·' \ .r·r. i,.·1 I May 22, 2014 Todd Shutz, Craft Architects 2505 Third Ave., Ste 324 Seattle, WA 98121 =.::........ ·-~ () ,\...;;#u~ Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPAi THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Haper Engineering Addition, LUA14-000454 Dear Mr. Shutz: This letter is written on behalfofthe Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a threshold Determination of Non,Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report, for a list of the Mitigation Measures. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on June 6, 2014, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510 .. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. lfyou have any further questions, please call me at (425) 430-6598. For the Environmental Review Committee, Jill Ding Senior Planner . Enclosure cc: Harper Engineering/ Owner(s) Todd Shutz/ Applicant Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • R~nton·, Washington 98057 • rentOnwa.gov Denis Law c· f ___ :Ma:yo~, ------· r 1ty O l -J.g· r1·r0,.rl May 22, 2014 Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent. Administrator Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPAi THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on May 19, 2014: SEPA DETERMINATION: Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated (DNSM) PROJECT NAME: Harper Engineering Addition PROJECT NUMBER: LUA14-0004S4 Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on June 6, 2014, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-6598. For the Environmental Review Committee, T1{;J}U Jill Ding Senior Planner Enclosure cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Boyd Powers, Department of Natural Resources Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, NW Region Larry Fisher, WDFW Duwamish Tribal Office US Army Corp. of Engineers Renton City Hall , 1055 South Grady Way , Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: -MITIGATED (DNS-M) LUA14-000454 Todd Shutz, Craft Architects, 2505 Third Aveenue, Ste. 324, Seattle, WA 98121 Harper Engineering Addition PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Approval for the addition of 8,312 square feet including a 5,660 square foot first floor addition and a 2,652 square foot second story addition. The proposed addition would result in the removal of 22 parking stalls and the replacement of 14 parking stalls, resulting in a net loss of 8 parking stalls for a total of 84 parking stalls available on the project site. The project site is located in the Medium Industrial {IM) zone. Access to the site is proposed via existing driveways off of SW 7th Street. The project site is located within a seismic hazard area. PROJECT LOCATION: LEAD AGENCY: 700 SW 7'" St, Renton WA 98055 City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030{2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-9-070D Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on June 6, 2014. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Community Services Department May 23, 2014 May 19, 2014 Date Date 5/li lief r r' Fire & Emergency Services Date tcth~,\L "m,:,~ ~ Department of Community & Date Economic Development DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNSM) MITIGATION MEASURES AND ADVISORY NOTES PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA14-000454 Todd Shutz, Craft Architects, 2505 Third Ave, Ste. 324, Seattle, WA 98121 Harper Engineering Addition PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Approval for the addition of 8,312 square feet including a 5,660 square foot first floor addition and a 2,652 square foot second story addition. The proposed addition would result in the removal of 22 parking stalls and the replacement of 14 parking stalls, resulting in a net loss of 8 parking stalls for a total of 84 parking stalls available on the project site. The project site is located in the Medium Industrial (IM) zone. Access to the site is proposed via existing driveways off of SW 7th Street. The project site is located within a seismic hazard area. PROJECT LOCATION: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 700 SW 7'h St., Renton WA 98055 The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division • Project construction shall be required to comply with the recommendations outlined in the submitted Geotechnical Engineering Design Study, prepared by Hart Crowser (dated July 18, 2007) and the updated Geotechnical Report, prepared by Earth Solutions NW LLC (dated March 18, 2011). ADIVISORY NOTES: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 3. Commercial, multi-family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 4. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to final occupancy permits Water: l. The project is within the City's water service area in the Downtown 196 hydraulic pressure-zone. 2. There is an existing fire line and double detector check valve assembly (DDCVA) in a vault serving the fire sprinkler system to the existing building. 3. There is a 1-1/2 inch domestic water meter serving the existing building at 700-SW 7th Street. 4. A system development fee for water will be owed if the size of the existing domestic water meter increases or additional meters are added based on the proposed expansion. Sewer. l. There is an existing 8-inch sewer main in SW 7th Street. There is a side sewer serving the existing building. 2. A system development fee for sewer will be owed if the size of the existing domestic water meter increases or additional domestic meters are added based on the proposed expansion. Surface Water: 1. The Drainage plans and a drainage report was submitted Barghausen Engineers. The project is exempt from all drainage review requirements. 2. A Construction Stormwater Permit from Department of Ecology is required if clearing and grading of the site exceeds one acre. 3. Surface Water System Development fees of $0.491 per square foot of new impervious surface will apply. This is payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. Transportation: 1. Existing right-of-way width in SW 7th Street fronting the site is 80 feet. SW 7th Street is classified as a Minor Arterial. To meet the City's complete street standards, street improvements including an 8- foot planter strip and 8-foot sidewalk are required to be constructed in the right of way fronting the site per City code 4-6-060. Dedication of 8 feet of right of way will be required. Improvements for this section of SW 7th are currently under review by the transportation department. This is a designated trail corridor. Applicant is encouraged to submit a letter requesting a modification to the new street standards since there is an existing planting strip and sidewalk fronting the site already. 2. Street improvements are exempt for new construction or additions with a valuation of less than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). 3. Traffic impact fees per additional generated daily trip may be assessed as determined by the ITE trip generation manual. 4. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. Any new services shall be installed underground. Fire: 1. Not Applicable General: ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 2 of 3 1. All construction utility permits for utilities, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. Any proposed rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height will require a separate building permit and special inspection. Separate permits and fees for water meters, side sewers, and backflow devices are required. ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 3 of 3 rt.·~. City of , .· .·· ... ··. __ __.__.__.J ·. '-. s Il I U IJ OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS Of AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: Harpers Engineering Addition LUA14-000454 700 SW ih St, Renton, WA 98055 DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Approval for the addition of 8,312 square feet including a 5,660 square foot first floor addition and a 2,652 square foot second story addition. The proposed addition would result in the removal of 22 parking stalls and the replacement of 14 parking stalls, resulting in a net loss of 8 parking stalls for a total of 84 parking stalls available on the project site. The project site is located in the Medium Industrial (IM) zone. Access to the site is proposed via existing drlveways off of SW 7th Street. The project site is located within a seismic hazard area. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on June 6, 2014, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, {425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. ~ \. .. .. ~. . . .,,.,.,......_....,_, . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430·7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT AND ADMINISTRATIVE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REPORT & DECISION ERC MEETING DATE: Project Name: Owner: Applicant/Contact: File Number: Project Manager: Project Summary: Project Location: May 19, 2014 Harper Engineering Addition Harper Engineering, 700 SW 7'" Street, Renton, WA 98055 Todd Schutz, Craft Architects, 2505 Third Avenue, Suite 324, Seattle, WA 98121 LUA14-0004S4, ECF, SA-A Jill Ding, Senior Planner The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Approval for the addition of 8,312 square feet including a 5,660 square foot first floor addition and a 2,652 square foot second story addition. The proposed addition would result in the removal of 22 parking stalls and the replacement of 14 parking stalls, resulting in a net loss of 8 parking stalls for a total of 84 parking stalls available on the project site. The project site is located in the Medium Industrial (IM) zone. Access to the site is proposed via existing driveways off of SW 7th Street. The project site is located within a seismic hazard area. 700 SW 7'" Street, Renton, WA 98055 ·------------~---~-----~ .,:i:,~~W~ir.'gi-96,749 SF '-c~c< Proposed New Bldg. Area'(gY~'t~t-"'' . 8,312 Sf STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated (DNS-M). Project Location Map ERC and Site Plan Report City of Renton Deportment of Community & HARPER fNG/NffR/NG mic Development Environmental Re ommittee & Administrative Site Plan Report WA14-000454, SA-A, fCF Report of May 19, 2014 Page 2 of 19 I A. EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1: Environmental Review Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report Exhibit 2: Site Demolition Plan & Architectural Site Plan Exhibit 3: Exterior Elevations Exhibit 4: Water Plan Exhibit 5: Landscape Planting Plan Exhibit 6: Landscape Irrigation Plan Exhibit 7: Geotechnical Engineering Design Study, prepared by Hart Crowser (dated July 18, 2007) Exhibit 8: Updated Geotechnical Report, prepared by Earth Solutions, NW, LLC (dated March 18, 2011) Exhibit 9: Technical Information Report (TIR) Exhibit 10: Landscape Analysis Exhibit 11: Environmental "SEPA" Determination I 8. GENERAL INFORMATION: Harper Engineering 1. Owner{s) of Record: 700 SW 7th Street Renton, WA 98055 Z. Zoning Designation: Medium lndustrial(IM) 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Employment Area Valley (EAV) 4. Existing Site Use: An existing 24,440 square foot manufacturing building with a 2 story office component and associated parking. 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: a. North: b. East: c. South: d. West: 6. Site Area: Existing Burlington Northern Railroad/Vacant (IM zone) Existing Industrial Use(/M zone) Warehouse (IM zone) Existing Burlington Northern Railroad/Warehouse (IM zone) 96,749 SF I C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Comprehensive Plan Zoning Annexation Site Plan Review fRC/Site Plan Report Land Use File No. N/A N/A N/A LUA07-077 Ordinance No. 5099 5100 1745 N/A Date 11/01/04 11/01/04 04/19/1959 10/24/2007 City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development HARPER ENGINEER/NG Environmental Review Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report LUA14-000454, SA-A, ECF Report of May 19, 2014 Page 3 of 19 II D-PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Existing Utilities a. Water: Water service would be provided by the City of Renton. b. Sewer: Sewer service would be provided by the City of Renton. c. Surface/Storm Water: There are storm improvements in SW J'h Street and a detention water quality vault is located on site. 2. Streets: There are frontage improvements within SW 7th Street, which abuts the project site along the south property line. Access to the site is provided via two existing driveways off of SW 7'h Street. 3. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts a. Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts b. Section 4-2-060: Zoning Use Table c. Section 4-2-130: Industrial Development Standards 2. Chapter 3 Land Use Districts a. Section 4-3-050: Critical Area Regulations 3. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards a. Section 4-4-070: Landscaping b. Section 4-4-075: Lighting, Exterior On-Site c. Section 4-4-080: Parking, Loading and Driveway Regulations d. Section 4-4-090 Refuse and Recyclables Standards e. Section 4-4-095 Screening and Storage Height/Location Limitations 4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards a. Section 4-6-060: Street Standards 5. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria a. Section 4-9-070 Environmental Review Procedures b. Section 4-7-200: Site Plan Review 6. Chapter 11 Definitions ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development HARPER ENGINEERING Report of May 19, 2014 G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element 2. Community Design Element I H. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Review Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report WA14-000454, SA-A, ECF Page 4 of 19 In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing develop·ment standards and environmental regulations. 1. Environmental Threshold Determination Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period. 2. Mitigation Measures a. Project construction shall be required to comply with the recommendations outlined in the submitted Geotechnical Engineering Design Study, prepared by Hart Crowser (dated July 18, 2007) and the updated Geotechnical Report, prepared by Earth Solutions NW LLC (dated March 18, 2011). 3. Environmental Impacts The Proposal wos circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the fol/awing probable impacts: a. Earth Impacts: The proposed project is anticipated to require 200 cubic feet of cut and SO cubic yards of fill for the construction of the proposed addition. A Geotechnical Engineering Design Study, prepared by Hart Crowser (dated July 18, 2007) (Exhibit 7) was submitted with the project application. This report was prepared for the construction of the original Harper Engineering building approved under LUA07-077 and included an analysis of the subsurface conditions based on the information gathered by 3 borings. An updated Geotechnical Report, prepared by Earth Solutions NW LLC (dated March 18, 2011) (Exhibit 8) was also submitted with the project application. This report provides recommendations for the construction of the proposed addition based on the subsurface analysis provided in the previous report prepared by Hart Crowser (Exhibit 7). The topography of the project site is relatively flat. Subsurface exploration consisting of 3 borings was conducted on the site by Hart Crowser for the construction of the original building in 2007. The soils on the upper portion of the site consist of very soft silt and clay that contain variable amounts of fine sand. These soils extend to a depth of 7 to 17 feet. Beneath the silt and clay layer, loose to medium dense sand with varying amounts of gravel was encountered. The sand becomes medium dense at a depth of 13 to 24 feet and then dense at a depth of about 25 to 35 feet. At a depth of 64 feet hard, sandy silt was encountered. Ground water was encountered in all three borings at a depth of about 10.5 to 11.5 feet below grade. The Geotechnical Engineering Design Study (Exhibit 7) prepared by Hart Crowser notes that the soils present on site are likely to settle and would be subject to liquefaction. To mitigate the settlement and liquefaction potential site preloading and over excavation of compressible soils and placement of structural fill beneath footings was recommended. The updated Geotechnical Report (Exhibit 8) prepared by Earth ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Deportment of Community & Economic Devefopment HARPER ENGINEERING Environmental Review Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report WA14-000454, SA-A, ECF Report of May 19, 2014 Page 5 of 19 Solutions NW recommends site preloading and the over excavation of compressible soils and the placement of structural fill beneath the footings of the addition area. By implementing similar mitigation measures for the addition as were implemented for the construction of the original building it is hoped that the risk for differential settlement between the addition and the original building could be mitigated. Due to the project site's location within a seismic hazard area, staff recommends as a SEPA mitigation measure that project construction comply with the recommendations provided in the submitted Geotechnical Engineering Design Study, prepared by Hart Crowser (dated July 18, 2007) (Exhibit 7) and the updated Geotechnical Report, prepared by Earth Solutions NW LLC (dated March 18, 2011) (Exhibit 8). Mitigation Measures: Project construction shall be required to comply with the recommendations outlined in the submitted Geotechnical Engineering Design Study, prepared by Hart Crowser (dated July 18, 2007) and the updated Geotechnical Report, prepared by Earth Solutions NW LLC (dated March 18, 2011). Nexus: SEPA Environmental Review b. Water I. Storm Water Impacts: A Technical Information Report (TIR), prepared by Barghausen Engineers (dated March 28, 2014) (Exhibit 9) was submitted with the project application. According to the TIR the proposal includes the modification of the existing parking lot and landscaping areas to accommodate the proposed building addition. The total area of impervious surface subject to vehicular traffic would be reduced as a result of the proposed addition. The proposed project would result in an addition of 411 square feet of impervious surface and a net decrease of impervious surface subject to vehicular traffic of 5,175 square feet. Th~ stormwater rul)o_ff generated by the proposed addition is proposed to be collected within the._ existing stormwater detention system constructed in 2001 with the initial building construction. The existing stormwater system included storm conveyance pipe, roof downspouts, and a wet detention vault. Minor changes are proposed to the storm system, included rerouting the system around the proposed addition. Stormwater from the proposed addition would be routed through the wetvault and then discharged into the existing public storm system in SW 7th Street. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended. Nexus: Not applicable. C-Transportation Impacts: The proposed project would maintain access via two existing driveways off of SW 7th Street. The project site currently has a surface parking lot with 92 parking stalls. The proposed addition would result in the removal of 22 parking stalls, 14 of which would be replaced for a net loss of 8 parking stalls. It is not anticipated that the proposed project would result in additional vehicular trips to the project site as the proposal would result in a net loss of 8 parking spaces. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended. Nexus: Not applicable. d. Fire & Police Impacts: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicated that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended. Nexus: Not applicable. ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development HARPER ENGINEERING Report of May 19, 2014 4. Comments of Reviewing Departments Environmental Review Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report WA14-000454, SA-A, ECF Page 6 of 19 The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant." I. ADMIN5TRATJVE 5/TE PLAN REVIEW FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The applicant, Harper Engineering, is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental 'SEPA' Review for the construction of a new 8,312 square foot addition (S,660 square foot 1" floor and 2,652 second floor). The proposed addition would result in a net loss of 8 parking spaces. The site is located within a seismic hazard area. 2. The proposed addition would result in the removal of 22 parking spaces, of which 14 are proposed to be replaces for a net loss of 8 parking spaces. Associated landscaping is proposed within the relocated parking areas. 3. The surface water runoff from the proposed addition would be collected and treated within the existing stormwater detention vault located in the center of the project site. 4. The subject property is located to the south and east of an existing Burlington Northern Railroad and to the north of SW 7'h Street. Existing industrial and warehouse uses surround the project site on the east, west, and south. The property to the north is vacant. 5. The 2.2 acre property is located within the Employment Area Valley (EAV) Comprehensive Plan land use designation, the Medium Industrial (IM) zoning classification, and the Employment Area Valley overlay. 6. The site is currently fully developed with a 24,440 square foot tilt-up concrete building and 92 parking spaces. The existing sturcture is currently utilized as a manufacturing space with a 2 story office component. 7. Access to the site would be maintained off of SW 7th Street via existing driveways. 8. The ground surface in the vicinity of the subject site is relatively flat. 9. There are no existing significant trees located on the project site. Site improvements would result in the removal of existing parking lot landscaping in the vicinity of the proposed addition. New landscaping is proposed within the reconfigured surface parking lot. 10. The Planning Division of the City of Renton accepted the above master application for review on April 7, 2014 and determined it complete on April 15, 2014. The project complies with the 120-day review period. 11. No public comments were received. 12. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended), on May 19, 2014, the City's Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated (DNS-M) (Exhibit 11). A 14-day appeal period will commence with this Administrative Site Plan Review Decision on May 23, 2014 and end on June 6, 2014. 13. Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments have been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of this report. 14. The proposal requires Site Plan Review. The following table contains project elements intended to comply with Site Plan Review decision criteria, as outlined in RMC 4-9-200.E: fRC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Deportment of Community & Economic Development HARPER ENGINEERING Environmental Review Committee & Administrotive Site Pion Report WA14-000454, SA-A, ECF Report of May 19, 2014 Page 7 of 19 i!, COMPR.EHENSIVEl'LAN COMPLIANCEANO CONSISTENCY: s··•. • ! • "'''-'~'~ '"' ' , The site is designated Emplo~Fll!!nt Arefvalley (fl\V) cm the Comprehensive Pla.n ~.nd• Use Map. The purpose oJ EAV iSI<lj!Chieve.s1:miKof uses including industrial, high te~hnplogy, office,and commercial activitiesiin Employment Area_s _that lea_d to economic groWth and ·a strengthening of Renton's employment base. The propos;d is compliant with the· following Comprehensive Plan policies: ' " " ',:\,:'_-,,, ,',':):_>: "·: , :,, ,I' ,I' Policy LU-317. Site Plan Review should be required for all new projects in the Employment Area-Valley pursuant to thresholds established in the City's development regulations. Policy LU-318. New development, or site redevelopment, should conform to development standards that include scale of building, building fa~ade treatment to reduce perception of bulk, relationship between buildings, and landscaping. Policy CD-30. Non-residential development should have site plans that provide street access from a principal arterial, consolidate access points to existing streets, and have internal vehicular circulation that supports shared access. Curb cuts and internal access should not conflict with pedestrian circulation. b: ZQNINli COM~-1:\NCE.A"'~'~ONIS~l'JC::V: . .. . . ·.·.. · ?• • ••· .· • ..... The .s~~ject sit!!)ft1assified'r.1e<1ium •hpustrial (l~)-On • the Gity o(Reiit8~ Zoning fv1ap. -The following development standards are~pplicabletoJ~e prop<JsFI: · · • .· . ti!:!.· Lot Dimensions: Per RMC 4-2-130A the minimum Jot size, in the JM zone, is 35,000 square feet. There are no minimum lat width or depth requirements. Not applicable. Setbacks: Per RMC4-2-130A the IM zoning classification requires a minimum front yard and!ilde yard olong a street setback of 20 feet along principle arterials. A 15-foot setback is required along other streets, except 50 feet if the Jot abuts or is adjacent to a residential zone. There is no interior side or rear yard setbacks except 50 feet if the lot abuts or is adjacent to a residential zone. There are no maximum setbacks required. According to the submitted site plan (Exhibit 2) the proposed addition would maintain a 123-foot 10- inch front yard setback, a 57-foot 8-inch side yard setback, and a 128-foot rear yard setback, which is well outside of any minimum setbacks required in the IM zone. Building Height: Per RMC 4-2-130A there are no maximum building height requirements in the IM zone. According to the submitted building elevations (Exhibit 2) the proposed 2-story addition would match the height of the existing building with a height of 25 feet 6 inches. The proposal complies with the building height requirements. Building Standards: Per RMC 4-2-130A there are no maximum lot coverage requirements in the IM zone. The existing structure has a building footprint of 21,560 square feet, which results in a lot coverage of 22 percent on the 96,749 square foot site. The proposed addition would add 5,660 square feet to the existing 21,560 square foot building footprint, increasing the lot coverage to 28 percent, which complies with the lot coverage requirements for the IM zone. Landscaping: Per RMC 4-4-070 ten feet of on-site landscaping is required along all public street frontages, with the exception of areas for required walkways and driveways or those projects with reduced setbacks. In addition, surface parking Jots with more than 14 stalls shall be landscaped as follows: 15 to 50 stalls requires 15 square feet of landscaping per parking space, 51 to 99 stalls ERC/Site Plan Repon City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development HARPER ENGINEERING Report of May 19, 2014 Environmental Review Committee & Administrative Site Pion Report LUA14-000454, SA-A, ECF Page 8 of 19 requires 25 square feet of landscaping per parking space, and 100 or more stalls requires 35 square feet of landscaping per parking space. Existing mature landscaping is located along the project site's SW 7'h Street frontage. The majority of the existing landscaping has a width of 15 feet; however there is a small portion on the southwest corner of the project site which has a minimum width of 10 feet due to the projection of a parking space within the landscaped area. The existing street frontage landscaping is currently located on the project site; however as a result of the proposed addition 8 feet of right-of-way dedication is required. The required right-of-way dedication would reduce the amount of onsite landscaping from 15 feet to 7 feet, which is less than the minimum 10 feet required. An exemption from the on-site street frontage landscaping requirements may be granted by the Administrator in accordance with RMC 4-4-070C.2.e "those alterations or small additions determined by the Community and Economic Development Administrator not to warrant improvements to the entire site." In addition, it is anticipated that the proposed project would qualify for an exemption from constructing frontage improvements with SW 7'h Street as there are existing frontage improvements within SW 7'h Street along the project site (see further discussion below under subsection 14.k Transportation). As the proposed addition and parking reconfiguration is located away from the SW 7th Street frontage, no changes are proposed to the existing landscaping along the SW 7th Street frontage, and it is anticipated that a waiver from frontage improvements would be granted staff recommends that the Administrator approve an exemption from the requirement for 10 feet of onsite landscaping along the SW 7th Street frontage. The project site would have 84 parking spaces after the construction of the proposed addition, which requires 25 square feet of landscaping per parking space for a total of 2,100 square feet of landscaping within the parking lot (25 sf x 84 spaces= 2,100 sf). The applicant submitted a landscape ~nalysi~ (Exhibit 10) with _t_he ,application materials, which indicates a total of 1_3L96~ square ~eet of landscaping would be provided onsite meeting the requirements for parking lot landscaping. According to the submitted landscape plan (Exhibit 5) the following plantings are proposed within the reconfigured parking area: Red Sunset Maple and Capital Ornamental Pear trees, Pink Abelia, Portugal Laurel, Harbor Dwarf Heavenly Bamboo, and Kinnikinnik. Underground sprinkler systems are required to be installed and maintained for all landscaped areas. The sprinkler system shall provide full water coverage of the planted areas specified on the plan. Staff recommends as a condition of approval that a detailed landscape and irrigation plan be submitted to the Current Planning Project Manager at the time of Building Permit review and that the landscaping be installed prior to Certificate of Occupancy. Refuse and Recyclables: The Refuse and Recyclables standards, RMC 4-4-090, provide minimum requirements for refuse and recyclables deposit areas. Manufacturing and other nonresidential developments are required to provide a minimum of 3 square feet per every 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area for recyclables deposit areas and a minimum of 6 square feet per every 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area for refuse deposit areas. A total minimum of 100 square feet shall be provided for recycling and refuse deposit areas. Refuse and recyclables deposit areas are required to be screened in accordance with RMC 4-4-090C. The existing building has a gross area of 24,440 square feet. The proposal includes the addition of 8,312 square feet of gross area to the existing building resulting in a total new gross area of 32,752 square feet. A gross building area of 32,752 square feet would require 98 square feet of recyclables deposit areas (32,752 sf/ 1,000 sf= 32.752 x 3 sf= 98 sf) and 197 square feet of refuse deposit areas (32,752 sf/ 1,000 sf= 32.752 x 6 sf= 196.5 sf). According to the submitted site plan (Exhibit 2) an existing refuse and recyclables deposit area totaling 180 square feet is proposed to remain on the project site, which is less than the minimum required. An additional 115 square feet of refuse and recyclables deposit areas are required to be provided on the project site. Staff recommends as a ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Deportment of Community & Ecmomic Development HARPER ENGINEERING Environmental Revi-Commirtee & Administrative Site Plan Report LUA14-000454, SA-A, ECF Report of May 19, 2014 Page 9 of 19 - condition of approval that a revised site plan be submitted at the time of Building Permit review identifying the required refuse and recyclables deposit areas in accordance with RMC 4-4-090 for review and approval by the Current Planning Project Manager. Refuse and recyclables deposit areas are required to be screened in accordance with RMC 4-4-090C. A screening detail was not included with the application materials. Staff recommends as a condition of approval that a refuse and recyclables deposit area screening detail be submitted at the time of building permit review for review and approval by the Current Planning Project Manager. Critical Areas: The site is located within a seismic hazard area. Seismic hazard areas are generally underlain by soft or loose, saturated soils and have a high potential for liquefaction during an earthquake. A Geotechnical Engineering Design Study, prepared by Hart Crowser (dated July 18, 2007) (Exhibit 7) was submitted with the project application. This report was prepared for the construction of the original Harper Engineering building approved under LUA07-077 and included an analysis of the subsurface conditions based on the information gathered by 3 borings. An updated Geotechnical Report, prepared by Earth Solutions NW LLC (dated March 18, 2011) (Exhibit 8) was also submitted with the project application. This report provides recommendations for the construction of the proposed addition based on the subsurface analysis provided in the previous report prepared by Hart Crowser (Exhibit 7). The Geotechnical Engineering Design Study (Exhibit 7) prepared by Hart Crowser notes that the soils present on site are likely to settle and would be subject to liquefaction. To mitigate the settlement and liquefaction potential site preloading and over excavation of compressible soils and placement of structural fill beneath footings was recommended. The updated Geotechnical Report (Exhibit 8) prepared by Earth Solutions NW recommends site preloading and the over excavation of compressible soils and the placement of structural fill beneath the footings of the addition area. By . --implementing·similar mitigation measures for the addition as were impiemehleaforthe construction of the original building it is hoped that the risk for differential settlement between the addition and the original building could be mitigated. As previously discussed above under the Environmental Review, Earth section of this report, due to the project site's location within a seismic hazard area, staff recommended compliance with the submitted geotechnical reports (Exhibits 7 and 8) during project construction as a SEPA mitigation measure. Parking.: The parking regulations, RMC 4-4-080, provide minimum dimensional requirements for parking stalls and drive aisle widths, and require a specific number of off-street parking stalls. : The following ratios would be applicable ta the site: Use SF Ratio Required Spaces Office, General 6,760 Min: 2.0 spaces I 1,000 Min: 13.S2 SF Max: 30.42 Max: 4.5 spaces I 1,000 SF Manufacturing 23,340 Min: 1.0 spaces I 1,000 Min: 23.34 SF Max: 35.01 Max: 1.5 spaces/ 1,000 SF Warehouse 2,652 Min/Max: 1.0 spaces I Min/Max: 1.76 1,500 SF ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development HARPER ENGINEERING Report of May 19, 2014 Toto/ 32,752 Environmental Review Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report LUA14-000454, SA-A, ECF N/A Min: 38.62 Max: 67.19 Page 10 of 19 According to the submitted site plan (Exhibit 2), the existing site currently has a total of 92 parking spaces. The proposed addition would result in the removal of 22 spaces, 14 spaces are proposed to be relocated elsewhere resulting in a total of 84 spaces on the project site. The amount of parking proposed exceeds the maximum number of spaces allowed by 17. According to the previous Site Plan Approval (LUA07-077) granted to Harper Engineering, 45 spaces have been approved for use by the Puget Sound Electrical Apprenticeship and Training Trust (Trust). This group was the previous owner of the subject property and had been required to develop property for off-site required parking as a condition of a 2001 site plan approval (LUAOl-011). In 2006, the Trust requested that this condition be removed based on a changed schedule that reduced the number of spaces required. They demonstrated, as part of this request, that their parking needs could be met in full within the boundaries of their property located at 550 SW 7th Street. The City of Renton modified the condition to require the Trust retain the ability to provide additional, off-site parking in the future should their program needs change. The additional, over the maximum parking spaces allowed are intended to be used by the Trust if needed in the future as specified in the previous site plan approval for Harper Engineering (LUA07-077) granted on October 24, 2007. With the addition of 45 stalls to be reserved for the Trust, the minimum number of spaces required on the project site increases to 84 spaces and the maximum number of spaces permitted increases to 112 spaces. The proposal for 84 spaces on the project site would comply with the parking requirements. , No ·m~re than '40 percent of parking spaces ·provided may be designated as compact spaces. The proposal includes 34 of the new spaces as designated compact spaces (34/84 = 40 percent), which complies with the maximum number of compact spaces requirement. Based on the proposal for 84 new parking spaces, a minimum of 4 ADA accessible spaces are required. The submitted site plan includes the provision for 4 ADA accessible spaces, which complies with the minimum requirements for ADA parking. The reconfigured parking areas would be comprised of 90 degree head in parking. The minimum dimensional requiremens for 90 degree head in parking are as follows: minimum stall width 9 feet, minimum stall depth 20 feet, and a drive aisle width of 24 feet. The proposed parking stalls comply with the minimum width and depth requirements. There are two locations where the minimum drive aisle width proposed at 20 feet, which is less than the minimum 24 feet required. The first location is adjacent to the two proposed spaces locate to the northwest of the addition area across from existing compact parking and the second location is located to the north of the addition between the existing building and 4 proposed parking spaces. Staff recommends as a condition of approval that the site plan be revised to bring the project into compliance with the minimum parking lot drive aisle width requirements. The revised site plan shall be submitted at the time of Building Permit Review for review and approval by the Currentl Planning Project Manager. Sidewalks, Pathways, and Pedestrian Easements: A pedestrian connection shall be provided form a public entrance to the street, unless the Reviewing Official determines that the requirement wauld unduly endanger the pedestrian. An existing pedestrian walkway connecting the main entrance of the existing Harper Engineering Building to the existing sidewalk along SW 7th Street would be retained. ERC/Site Plan Repart City of Renton Department of Community & Ecowmic Development HARPER ENGINEERING Environmental Review Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report WA14-000454, SA-A, ECF Report of May 19, 2014 Page 11 of 19 Notappli~able. . .•. :i! .... ii ... • ••••• . · . .·· ... . .. e. OFF SITE IMPACTS: ·. ... . . -... ···•))'••'"·. . ··········· .... . · ••• . Structures: Restricting overscale structures and overconcentratian of development on a particular portion of the site. The proposal includes the 2-story addition of 8,312 square feet to the west side of the existing 24,440 square foot Harper Engineering building. The height of the proposed addition would match the height of the existing building at 25 feet 6 inches. The proposal would not result in any overscale structures or overconcentration of development. Circulation: Providing desirable transitions and linkages between uses, streets., walkways and adjacent properties. There are two existing pedestrian walkways, one connecting the main building entrance to SW 7th Street and the other providing pedestrian access through the parking lot on the west side of the building to the main building entrance. Both existing pedestrian walkways are proposed to be retained as a result of the proposed project. The proposal complies with this requirement. Loading and Storage Areas: Locating, designing and screening storage areas, utilities, raaftap equipment, loading areas, and refuse and recyclables ta minimize views from surrounding properties. The proposed addition includes a new overhead drive-in door, which would be located to the rear of the new building and screened from public view. The proposed addition would also provide screening of an existing shed, proposed to remain, from public view. As previously discussed above under section 14.b refuse and recyclables, staff recommended as a condition of approval the provision of additional refuse and recyclables deposit areas and a screening detail to comply with the minimum requirements under RMC 4·4'090. Staff ·further recomme·nds as a condition of approval that the location of any additional refuse and recyclables deposit area(s) be situated in a location such as to minimize the view of the refuse and recyclables deposit areas from surrounding properties. Views: Recognizing the public benefit and desirability of maintaining visual accessibility to attractive natural features. The proposed project includes the construction of an 8,312 square foot 2-story addition to the existing 24,440 square foot 2-story Harper Engineering building. The proposed addition would match the existing building height of 25 feet 6 inches. It is not anticipated that the proposed addition would adversely impact views of surrounding properties. In addition, the proposed addition would be located on the west side of the existing building, therefore it is not anticipated that the addition would impact views to Mt. Rainier, which is located to the south and east of the project site, from the existing building. Landscaping: Using landscaping to provide transitions between development and surrounding properties to reduce noise and glare, maintain privacy, and generally enhance the appearance of the project. As previously discussed above under section 14.b landscaping, existing mature landscaping is proposed to be retained around the perimeter of the project site. New landscaping is proposed to be installed within the reconfigured parking area in the vicinity of the proposed addition. The existing landscaping located along SW 7th Street provides a visual buffer of the existing development from SW J'h Street. The landscaping proposed in the vicinity of the addition would enhance the appearance of the parking lot and the proposed addition. Lighting: Designing and/or placing exterior lighting and glazing in order to avoid excessive brightness or glare to adjacent properties and streets ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community & EcO"lomic Development HARPER ENGINEERING Report of May 19, 2014 Environmental Review Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report LUA14-0f!0454, SA-A, ECF Page 12 of 19 A lighting plan was not provided with the project materials. Any proposed building lights would be required to be directed onto the building itself or the ground abutting it. The light emissions shall not be visible above the roofline of the building. Any lighting proposed within the parking lot shall be non-glare and mounted no more than 25 feet above the ground to minimize impact onto adjacent and abutting properties. All fixtures shall be fitted with a cutoff type luminaire. Staff recommends, as a condition of approval, the applicant be required to provide a lighting plan that adequately provides for public safety without casting excessive glare on adjacent properties. The lighting plan shall be submitted at the time of building permit review for review and approval by the Current Planning Project Manager. Structure Placement: Provisions for privacy and noise reduction by building placement, spacing ond orientation. The proposed addition would be located on the west side of the main Harper Engineering building and would be setback 57 feet 8 inches from the nearest side property line and 123 feet 10 inches from SW 7'' Street. The proposed building addition is not anticipated to have an adverse noise level or privacy impact on abutting and adjacent properties. Structure Scale: Consideration of the scale of proposed structures in relation ta natural characteristics, views and vistas, site amenities, sunlight, prevailing winds, and pedestrian and vehicle needs. The proposed addition would match the height of the existing building with a height of 25 feet 6 inches and is not anticipated to have an adverse impact on views of abutting and adjacent properties. The proposed addition has been sited to avoid impacts to existing landscaping, existing pedestrian connections, and existing Vehicular circulation amunct-tfie s-ite perimeter. In addition, the h"eight and siting of the proposed addition on the west side of the existing building would prevent excessive shading of abutting and adjacent properties. Natural Features: Protection of the natural landscape by retaining existing vegetation and soils, using topography to reduce undue cutting and filling, and limiting impervious surfaces. The proposed addition would largely be constructed over existing impervious surface. As a result of the proposed construction, approximately 411 square feet of new impervious surface is proposed. The majority of existing landscaping on the project site would be retained. A small area of existing parking lot landscaping would be removed for the construction of the proposed addition. New landscaping is proposed to be installed within the reconfigured parking area, including 3 Capital Ornamental Pear and 6 Red Sunset Maple trees. The project site is located within a seismic hazard area. According to the submitted geotechnical reports (Exhibits 7 and 8) site preloading and the placement of structural fill are recommended to mitigate the potential for liquefaction and the settlement of the proposed addition. Approximately 200 cubic yards of cut and 50 cubic yards of fill are proposed. Landscaping: Use of landscaping ta soften the appearance of parking areas, to provide shade and privacy where needed, ta define and enhance open spaces, and generally ta enhance the appearance of the project. Landscaping also includes the design and protection of planting areas so that they ore less susceptible ta damage from vehicles or pedestrian movements. Landscaping has been incorporated into to the reconfigured surface parking area, which softens the appearance of the parking area. A total of 3 Capital Ornamental Pear and 6 Red Sunset Maple trees are proposed within the parking lot to provide shade and break up the expanse of pavement (Exhibit 5). The landscaping would enhance the appearance of the project if all conditions of approval are ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development HARPER ENGINEER/NG Report of May 19, 2014 complied with. g. ACCESS: Environmental Review Committee & Administrative Site Pion Report LUA14-000454, SA-A, ECF Page 13 of 19 location and Consolidation: Providing access points on side streets or frontage streets rather than directly onto arterial streets and consolidation of ingress and egress points on the site and, when feasible, with adjacent properties. Access to the site would be provided via the existing driveways onto SW 7'h Street (Minor Arterial). No new driveways or curb cuts are proposed. Internal Circulation: Promoting safety and efficiency of the internal circulation system, including the location, design and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian access points, drives, parking, turnarounds, walkways, bikeways, and emergency access ways. The internal circulation of the site would largely remain unchanged with the construction of the proposed addition. Vehicular access around the perimeter of the project site would be maintained. The proposed addition would be constructed over 22 existing parking spaces and a drive aisle located on the west side of the existing Harper Engineering building. Vehicular access, which is currently provided through this parking area, would no longer be possible once the addition is constructed; however adequate area is proposed for vehicular maneuverability. The proposed addition has been sited such that all existing pedestrian walkways on the project site would be maintained. loading and Delivery: Separating loading and delivery areas from parking and pedestrian areas. A new overhead drive in door is proposed on the rear (north) fa~ade of the proposed addition. The drive in door wo_uld be s 0 epara_ted fro~ <:e_:<jsting and_ proposed parking areas. and pedestrian walkways. Transit and Bicycles: Providing transit, carpools and bicycle facilities and access. According to the submitted application materials, the nearest transit stop is located 800 feet away on Lind Avenue SW. Per RMC 4-4-080F.ll 0.5 the number of bicycle parking spaces shall be 10% of the number of required off-street parking spaces. A total of 92 parking spaces are currently located on the project site. The proposed addition would result in a net loss of 8 parking spaces for a total of 84 total spaces remaining on the project site. Based on the proposal for 84 parking spaces, a total of 8 spaces for bicycle parking (0.10 x 84 spaces = 8.4 bicycles spaces) would be required. No areas for bicycle parking were shown on the submitted site plan materials, therefore staff recommends as a condition of approval that a revised site plan be submitted at the time of building permit review demonstrating compliance with the applicable bicycle parking requirements under RMC 4-4-080F.ll. The required bicycle parking shall be installed prior to Certificate of Occupancy. Pedestrians: Providing safe and attractive pedestrian connections between parking areas, buildings, public sidewalks and adjacent properties. There are two existing pedestrian connections on the project site. One provides access from SW 7th Street to the main building entrance and the other is provided through the existing parking area to the west of the building to the main building entrance. No changes are proposed to the existing pedestrian connections. The proposal includes the retention of a substantial amount of existing mature vegetation around the £RC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community & Ec-omic Development HARPER ENGINEER/NG Report of May 19, 2014 Environmental Review Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report WA14-000454, SA-A, ECF .. Page 14 of 19 project site. In addition, new landscaping is proposed within the reconfigured parking area. The existing and proposed landscaping softens the look of the parking lot and provides a visual buffer. In addition, an existing pedestrian walkway connecting SW 7'h Street with the main building entrance provides access to the existing sidewalk system along SW 7'h Street, which serves as an amenity for employees who would like to take a walk. Both the Black River Riparian Forest and the Springbrook Trail are located in the project vicinity and would be within walking distance. sq~~tEss~·Wfien_fJ't5,si6/e~prov{diQgy_iew aitfff~o/f!i~O:~~~~f)nes•a'rl~;iv1i.--Rainier, .and ublic access to shorelines. . • .. ... : ~'t •• · ::_;,,,ti The proposed addition would not block view corridors to shorelines or Mt. Rainier. The public access requirement is not applicable as the site is not adjacent to a shoreline. 1.··wl!!ttfRAt.S~tEMSi""•,fr-iJI.QY/ng J)JP/~~t."i:/e111~~-to_pi@~texistiiJ~Z11~tural.$ysfi:ms .. "'~l'(~Oppli~C1£/~:······ , ' --. ,.,_,. ----·, ,,. , .· · · "--"'-';;;:,,,\ v·,s·c,--· .. i ... ,,,,.,,. ,. · :< -:::,::-,:,,,-. , ,< . .':. ·><·<,,:-~<---·, ,, .. ,, .. ,,-~i>oo"'.-;".·> .. :>.:: .::.::!::Y 1;, The project site is currently fully developed with an existing 24,440 square foot building for Harper Engineering, and associated parking and landscaping improvements. The proposal includes the addition of 8,312 square feet to the west side of the existing building and the reconfiguration of existing parking. Existing mature landscaping located along the site's SW 7th Street frontage and around the perimeter of the project site would be retained as part of the development proposal. Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicated that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development. Parks and Recreation: Not Applicable --------~--~-~·-~---~=-~~--~~----~~-~---~~~---'-II Drainage: A Technical Information Report (TIR), prepared by Barghausen Engineers (dated March 28, 2014) (Exhibit 9) was submitted with the project application. According to the TIR the proposal includes the modification of the existing parking lot and landscaping areas to accommodate the proposed building addition. The total area of impervious surface subject to vehicular traffic would be reduced as a result of the proposed addition. The proposed project would result in an addition of 411 square feet of impervious surface and a net decrease of impervious surface subject to vehicular traffic of 5,175 square feet. The stormwater runoff generated by the proposed addition is proposed to be collected within the existing stormwater detention system constructed in 2001 with the initial building construction. The existing stormwater system included storm conveyance pipe, roof downspouts, and a wet detention vault. Minor changes are proposed to the storm system, included rerouting the system around the proposed addition. Stormwater from the proposed addition would be routed through the wetvault and then discharged into the existing public storm system in SW 7th Street. Staff has reviewed the submitted TIR and concluded that the proposed project would be exempt from all drainage review requirements. Transportation: Access to the project site is currently provided via two existing driveways onto SW 7'h Street. No changes are proposed to the existing site access. The existing right-of-way width in SW 7th Street fronting the project site is 80 feet. SW 7th Street is classified as a Minor Arterial. To meet the City's complete street standards, street improvements including an 8-foot planter strip and 8- foot sidewalk are required to be constructed in the right of way fronting the site per City code 4-6- 060. Dedication of 8 feet of right of way will be required. Improvements for this section of SW 7th are currently under review by the transportation department. SW 7th Street is a designated trail corridor. The applicant is encouraged to submit a letter requesting a modification to the new street standards since there is an existing planting strip and sidewalk fronting the site already. Street improvements are exempt for new construction or additions with a valuation of less than fifty thousand dollars ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development HARPER ENGINEERING Environmental Review Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report LUA14-000454, SA-A, ECF Report of May 19, 2014 Page 15 of 19 ($50,000.00). Staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant submit an application for a Modification to the Street Standards or submit engineering plans for the required frontage improvements. The Modification request or frontage improvement civil plans shall be submitted to the Plan Reviewer for review and approval at the time of building permit review. Traffic impact fees per additional generated daily trip may be assessed as determined by the ITE trip generation manual. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. Any new services shall be installed underground. Schools: Not Applicable. Water and Sewer: Water service is provided by the City of Renton. The project is within the City's water service area in the Downtown 196 hydraulic pressure-zone. There is an existing fire line and double detector check valve assembly (DDCVA) in a vault serving the fire sprinkler system to the existing building. There is a 1-1/2 inch domestic water meter serving the existing building at 700 -SW 7th Street. A system development fee for water will be owed if the size of the existing domestic water meter increases or additional meters are added based on the proposed expansion. Sewer service is provided by the City of Renton. There is an existing 8-inch sewer main in SW 7th Street. There is a side sewer serving the existing building. A system development fee for sewer will be owed if the size of the existing domestic water meter increases or additional domestic meters are added based on the proposed expansion. i /, CONCLUSIONS: 1. Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the responsible officials issue a Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated (Exhibit 11). 2. The proposal complies with the Site Plan Review Criteria if all conditions of approval are met. 3. The proposal is compliant and consistent with the plans, policies, regulations and approvals if all condition of approval are met. 4. Staff does not anticipate any adverse impacts on surrounding properties and uses as long as the conditions of approval are complied with. S. The proposed use is anticipated to be compatible with existing and future surrounding uses as permitted in the IM zoning classification. 6. The scale, height and bulk of the proposed building addition are appropriate for the site. 7. Safe and efficient access and circulation has been provided for all users. 8. There are adequate public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use. 9. The proposed location would not result in the detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed location is suited for the proposed use. 10-The proposed use would not result in a substantial or undue adverse effect on adjacent properties. ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development HARPER ENGINEER/NG Report of May 19, 2014 11. Adequate parking would be provided. Environmental RevieV'' Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report WA14-0004S4, SA-A, ECF Page 16 of 19 12. The proposed site plan ensures safe movement for vehicles and pedestrians and has mitigated potential effects on the surrounding area if all conditions of approval are complied with. 13. The proposed development would not generate any long term harmful or unhealthy conditions. Potential noise, light and glare impacts from the proposed use have been evaluated and mitigated if all conditions of approval are complied with. 14. Landscaping has been provided in all areas not occupied by paving. I J. DECISION: The proposed Site Plan for the Harper Engineering Addition, File No. LUA14-000454, ECF, SA-A, is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the 1 mitigation measure issued as a part of the SEPA Determination of Non-Significance Mitigation on May 19, 2014 by the Environmental Review Committee: Project construction shall be required to comply with the recommendations outlined in the submitted Geotechnical Engineering Design Study, prepared by Hart Crowser (dated July 18, 2007) and the updated Geotechnical Report, prepared by Earth Solutions NW LLC (dated March 18, 2011). 2. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the Current Planning Project Manager at the time of Building Permit review for review and approval and the landscaping and irrigation shall be installed prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 3. A revised site plan shall be submitted at the time of Building Permit review identifying the required .. refuse and recyclables deposit areas in accordance with RMC 4-4-090 for review and approval by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit issuance. 4. A refuse and recyclables deposit area screening detail shall be submitted at the time of building permit review for review and approval by the Current Planning Project Manager. 5. The location of any additional refuse and recyclables deposit area(s) shall be situated in a location such as to minimize the view of the refuse and recyclables deposit areas from surrounding properties. 6. The site plan shall be revised to bring the project into compliance with the minimum parking lot drive aisle width requirements. The revised site plan shall be submitted at the time of Building Permit Review for review and approval by the Current! Planning Project Manager. 7. A revised site plan shall be submitted at the time of building permit review demonstrating compliance with the applicable bicycle parking requirements under RMC 4-4-080F.ll. The required bicycle parking shall be installed prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 8. A lighting plan that adequately provides for public safety without casting excessive glare on adjacent properties shall be submitted at the time of building permit review for review and approval by the Current Planning Project Manager. 9. The applicant shall submit an application for a Modification to the Street Standards to waive the required frontage improvements or shall submit engineering plans for the required frontage improvements. The Modification request or frontage improvement civil plans shall be submitted to the Plan Reviewer for review and approval at the time of building permit review. ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community & Ee "lie Development HARPER ENGINEER/NG Report of May 19, 2014 =---C.E. "Chip" Vincent, CED Administrator Environmental Review Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report LUA14-000454, SA-A, ECF Page 17 of 19 TRANSMITTED this 23'd day of May, 2014 to the Contact/Applicant/Owner: Contact/Applicant: Craft Architects Todd Schutz 2505 Third Ave, Suite 324 Seattle, WA 98121 Owner: Harper Engineering 700 SW t• Street Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED this 23'd day of May, 2014 to the Parties of Record: None TRANSMITTED this 23'd day of May, 2014 to the following: Neil Watts, Development Services Director Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Director Craig Burnell, Building Official Steve Lee, Development Services Manager Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager Fire Mar.,hal Renton Reporter Land Use Action Appeals, Request for Reconsideration, & Expiration The Environmental Determination and the Administrative Site Development Plan Review decisions will become final if the decisions are not appealed within 14 days of the decision date. Environmental Determination Appeal: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 p.m., June 6, 2014. Administrative Site Development Plan Approval Appeal: Appeals of the administrative site development plan review decision must be filed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 p.m. on June 6, 2014. APPEALS: An appeal of the decision(s) must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3}; WAC 197-11-680). Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the $250.00 application fee to Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7th Floor, (425) 430-6510. RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days of the decision date, any party may request that a decision be reopened by the Administrator (Decision-maker). The Administrator (Decision-maker) may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator (Decision-maker) finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14-day appeal timeframe. EXPIRATION: The Administrative Site Development Plan Review decision will expire two (2) years from the date of decision. A single two (2) year extension may be requested pursuant to RMC 4-9-200. ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Department of Community & Ee HARPER ENGINEERING ic Development Environmental Review Committee & Administrative Site Plan Report WA14-000454, SA-A, ECF Report of May 19, 2014 Page 18 of 19 THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE: provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning the land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial decision, but to Appeals to the Hearing Examiner as well. All communications after the decision/approval date must be made in writing through the Hearing Examiner. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the appeal by the Court. ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 3. Commercial, multi-family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be . restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 4. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to final occupancy permits Water: 1. The project is within the City's water service area in the Downtown 196 hydraulic pressure-zone. 2. There is an existing fire line and double detector check valve assembly (DDCVA) in a vault serving the fire sprinkler system to the existing building. 3. There is a 1-1/2 inch domestic water meter serving the existing building at 700 -SW 7th Street. 4. A system development fee for water will be owed if the size of the existing domestic water meter increases or additional meters are added based on the proposed expansion. Sewer. 1. There is an existing 8-inch sewer main in SW 7th Street. There is a side sewer serving the existing building. 2. A system development fee for sewer will be owed if the size of the existing domestic water meter increases or additional domestic meters are added based on the proposed expansion. Surface Water: 1. The Drainage plans and a drainage report was submitted Barghausen Engineers. The project is exempt from all drainage review requirements. 2. A Construction Stormwater Permit from Department of Ecology is required if clearing and grading of the site exceeds one acre. 3. Surface Water System Development fees of $0.491 per square foot of new impervious surface will apply. This is payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. Transportation: 1. Existing right-of-way width in SW 7th Street fronting the site is 80 feet. SW 7th Street is classified as a Minor Arterial. To meet the City's complete street standards, street improvements including an 8-foot ERC/Site Plan Report City of Renton Deportment of Community & E. HARPER ENGINEERING Report of May 19, 2014 1ic Development Environmental ReviPw r:ommittee & Administrative Site Plan Report LUA14-000454, 5A-A, ECF Page 19 of 19 planter strip and 8-foot sidewalk are required to be constructed in the right of way fronting the site per City code 4-6-060. Dedication of 8 feet of right of way will be required. Improvements for this section of SW 7th are currently under review by the transportation department. This is a designated trail corridor. Applicant is encouraged to submit a letter requesting a modification to the new street standards since there is an existing planting strip and sidewalk fronting the site already. 2. Street improvements are exempt for new construction or additions with a valuation of less than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). 3. Traffic impact fees per additional generated daily trip may be assessed as determined by the ITE trip generation manual. 4. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. Any new services shall be installed underground. Fire: 1. Not Applicable General: 1. All construction utility permits for utilities, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. Any proposed rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height will require a separate building permit and special inspection. 3. Separate permits and fees for water meters, side sewers, and backflow devices are required. ... -,.,_ -... ·, r. .· £RC/Site Plan Report ~ fer ~ ~ m ,,. ~ ·.'" ; ii1 0 m "' 0 r 3 0 z -, i;: z .$· "' ~ ·.:,,. • a, ~ •o ~ ffi m 0 2 a, :,,. r ~ ;ii :,,. z EXHIBIT 2 . -~-~ -+ -· -~,~-;,_---;,._· _. _. ------'"-': __ ""'-\ ' ----- '~"'~"~~"~,=--.. ----, \ 0 -J • • ' • ·"7,---. \ -l--=----=-------;.,"";"~.lll-=------', ... , -., >., " ----"""'.7:.......__-....... -\-\'.------------------------ -4 ··-...._,_\ HARPER ENGINEERING BUILDING ADDmoN 700 SW 7TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 DI • I i I I I I ....... !! ;~I I ~f : ' " ! • ' . I ' i . • i :·t---'r'-~='1 ' ' :: " ,, " " " " " " : :1----_,,_-~, " " " " " " " " " :: " " : :t-----,t--,tt,I ::1 11· i!1 I ' "lllill=LJ,\LU " z 0 ~ m r m < )> =l 0 z {' rir ~ ! s I' -,, ;J ~ ' ! I a ! "' :,;; m "1 m r m ~ z ~ 11 f 1 • I ' ... ·---© ~i' I l ' u> ~~ b "i 'I m r m < )> g z HARPER ENGINEERING BUILDING ADDmON 700 SW 7TH S1REET RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 EXHIBIT 3 I !! ,,, ~ IJ,! ~i~ i E~ !jl~ 12 ~ p~ i !§ ; i ~ .. i q ~ i fll i • ' U 111 1111 i ml ''I ii . 2): / 11 ; /1 \II / : ' 1:-· i:= i 1 1: ! I \) I ' I • I / C 1 -----®-'· ~ Cl ~ R EXHIBIT 4 z I I I\ ,/ 'I I I I I I u ASP~Lf PARKi!G '\-- ) I ! L. ,---- rr r11 ---------V 7/ ,,--________ ::. .,,,,,// I ·I I / I I ! / 21'!'> ( el'i l Ii I' ~~----~ ~--~-~-J, t 0•0 + . " Im,;;: I 001 \ EXHIBIT 5 ~~~~------.. ~®::-·-!± _ ~ P1ona;o~ai.a1<>~g/e"o11e ~·o, ~CITY< ~ RENTC "0. S"'1SJ,:)N r r 11 EXHIBIT 6 EXHIBIT 7 Geotechnica/ Engineering Design Study Harper Engineering Building Renton, Washington Prepared for Harper Engineering July 18, 2007 7508-02 -.. RECEIVED APR O 7 ;'r,c CITY oc: r.:·.-,,~,-,._, • • ''"-\ -~ ' ._ •• · j Pt.C1h:i.J f''.C G,·J,S.C'< HLIRTCROWSER i March 18, 2011 ES-2004 Craft Architects 2505 Third Avenue, Suite 324 Seattle, Washington 98121 Attention: Kathy Craft Subject: Proposed Warehouse Addition Harper Engineering 700 Southwest 71 h Street Renton, Washington References: Hart Crowser Geotechnical Engineering Design Study July 18, 2007 - Rainier Surveying EXHIBIT 8 I --- Earth Solutions NW LLC • Ceotechnical Engineering • Construction Monitoring • Environmental Sciences RECEIVED AP? 0 7 ZG':~ --=--·-.;,- Harper Engineering Settlement Plate Monitoring Results March 7, 2008 DC! Engineers Harper Engineering Addition Sheets S1 .1 through S4.1, January 25, 2011 Dear Kathy: In accordance with your request, Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) has prepared this letter to provide geotechnical recommendations for the construction of an addition to the north side of the existing Harper Engineering building. Our scope of services for this project included a site visit to observe the existing site conditions, review of the referenced documents and preparation of this letter. Based on the referenced DCI plans, the addition will be located on the north side of the existing building and will add approximately 44 feet to the length of the building. The footprint of the addition is currently paved with asphalt. Based on our experience with similar buildings, we anticipate the foundation loads will be in the range of 80 to 100 kips for column loads and two to four kips per foot for wall loads. Slab on grade loads are anticipated to be 150 pounds per square foot (psf) or less. 1805 -136th Place N.E .. Suite 201 • Bellevue, WA 98005 • (425) 449-4704 • FAX 1425) 449-4711 C March, 28 2014 Harper Engineering Addition Landscape Analysis, Lot Coverage and Parking Analysis • Total square footage of site and footprints of all buildings: Total site square footage Footprint of existing building Footprint of building addition = 96,749 sf (2.21 Acres) = 21,560 sf = 5,660 sf • Total square footage of impervious surface areas: 83,054 sf of total impervious surface. • Square footage (by floor and overall total) of each building: 1st floor existing building 1st floor addition 2nd floor existing building 2nd floor addition Total = 21,560 sf = 5,660 sf = 2,880 sf = 2 652 sf = 32,752 sf. EXHIBIT 9 • Percentage of lot covered by buildings or structures: 32,752 sf building area/ 96,749 sf site area= 33.9% REC1=1, ,.en • Number of parking space required by code: 6,760 sf Office @ 2 stalls/1,000 sf 23,340 sf Manufacturing@ 1 stall/1,000 sf 2,652 sf Warehouse @ 1 stall/1,500 sf Additional stalls required per agreement with PSE Total = 14 stalls required = 23 stalls required = 2 stalls required = 45 stalls = 84 stalls required • Number and dimensions of parking stalls provided: Standard Stalls (9'x20') Compact Stalls (8'-6"x16') ADA Stalls (9'x20') Total = 46 stalls provided = 34 stalls provided = 4 stalls provided = 84 stalls provided • Square footage of parking lot landscaping (perimeter and interior) 13, 965 sf of total landscaping 2505 Third Avenue, Suite 324 Seattle Washington 98121 Phone 206.720.7001 Fax 206.720.2949 -.. .,,. j EXHIBIT 10 TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT Proposed Harper Engineering Building Expansion 700 S.W. 7th Street Renton, WA 98055 Prepared for: Harper Engineering Co. 700 S.W. 7th Street Renton, WA 98055 March 28, 2014 Our Job No. 16585 RECEIVED APR O 7 2014 CITY OF RENTON PlJ\NNING DIVISION CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES + TUMWATER, WA + LONG BEACH, CA + WALNUT CREEK, CA + SAN DIEGO, CA www.barghausen.com • City of R __ ,_on Department of Community & Economic Devc1opment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 29, 2014Rf::0,-.. .. APPLICATION NO: LUA14-000454 DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 15, 2014 APPLICANT: Todd Schutz PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Ding , _ .,, " 1 0 2014 PROJECT TITLE: Harper Engineering PROJECT REVIEWER: Steve Lee SITE AREA: 96749 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 20,765 square feet LOCATION: 700 SW 7'h Street PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 5,660 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Approval for the addition of 8,312 square feet including a 5,660 square foot first floor addition and a 2,652 square foot second story addition. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minar Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Uoht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transoortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000Feet 14,000Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we hove expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wh re additional information i eded to properly assess this proposal. 1-21-1-f Date NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) ~M,rn,--NSbHn modond >«>t>t•d wttht .. 0.p•""""' o!Con,mun.,.,&!co"""'"'°""""P"'""' (<ZD)-~°""'*"ol"m<CJryol~..-.. n.o!oil"""••""•ftyclffc<ll""tho_;,,.,;.,,...,tt,,~ .....i .. .., .......... DU!Dl'NOllC,:Dl' .... OU0.110«: Apri1I!,lC14 ""°'KT 0'5<;111"'10«: Tho •o,,{"'1st ~ ~ .... >4mlolstrww Sit• P1ao _.,_,,.,,. ""' ""'"'°" of 8,lll '®'I"""' .......... • S,Wl,quu, roo, 11t,;t "'->dd""" ,,.. , i,m ,quoro faot...,,,.., ""'"' ..,da,oo, n,e ""'""'""''"'"'°"'""old"""";"""''-oll2"'""""''''"'"""-"'"'""'rio"'""'11,, ...... ..,. ... notlo.udlpa,0<1n&mt.lo>-,tot,<<>l'll,l ......... .,.j~mll°"'•ntl,.""'""""'• Tho•-"" ~I0<'1od;n, .. -.. , ....... n,11,MI __ ,,,, ... .,.. ............. -.,.or1,......,.offo/SWnt,$!<ttt.""""""''"' """'""""'·-"""".,,,;.a-"" P•WK"flO<:.OllQH: ,,..,,,,,..._ llfflOMjN ... TION DI' NON-s«;NfF>CAN<;>. 1•1m,s1.-rn, IDN5-MI: h tl>o Lood ~ • ..., City ot """"" 1,,o -"'"""'1 !Ml ,..,,me... """ilOM>en"I ..-.pa,cn,,. unl .. ly to roiult lr<>m"" ~ ""'j,tct. _,._ u """""'""""""'""IICW0.1lC.1l-0,""c;,-,ofA..,on~ow"'""'"• .. .,.IO'iS-M"""'..,"'.,.._'h'"'°"'" M • IU:.ly tot,, -· 0:0..""'1t !>'riool l<>I oho pro/<CI o,w:I , .. ,,...,,,.... DNS-,M ,,. I-mod ;n,, , "'V -- -n,.,,.w111,,. ""-"''"' i>'noc11o1-nctt..1n .. ""' of,.._ °''"""""t1onot~nm<>not- "'"'"'""ION.-,..I. A10<l,y•OP••ll""odwlll1olkw,1 ........ ,""of1-.0«S-M Al'PUUNT/l'l!OlfCTCONTAcrl'l"'50tl: Tod<l~en.lt~n,l:"A .. MOtll4,Sutt1o,WA tll.l:1/0ffll:,,:,,lde,.,.fb_....,_ .......... ,-Dra ....... ..,,,__""'"'""" o.-.,no1C.O,,,,,,un"'IE<on<orni<_olo.......,(CE1>l-l'll,n<na o-.~-R-Ot'fHll!,10:USou,h~,...,-.-.w• _, Too .. i,;.am~do<;lna1...,.........,.....,...,.,...,_,c0Mp.E,0'1onlMOfl' o!Jlaoo,nComp<«>OO"""L.,.dU.."'oond.....,luml"""""''l'"'l""tl>o Ot-t,z...-. ... p. ~,.,.,-... ,.bt,,_,.,,...r_to_lunM,kllormaoo,oo,t,;1p<opo....,p,o)«t.0>mp;,1.tho, fomi Ind,-,,.'°' Qryd"'"'°" C!O -eta,.,; ... oo.<-. 1055 5<. GndyWoV, ~onton, WA 'IICS7 • ... -.'fllt too.: Ho,po, EOFM"nnc/LUA:1,-0,005<. EO'. SA-A ""'"'!· ______________________ _ ....,UNG.,,D•l'< __________ Clfl'f<t,lO/Zlo. ______ _ T:!:IEPHO"!NO ---------- CERTIFICATION """""""'"""'I Do<w Ev,I,...,. thoPn>i><'"d Pn,!<<'"~ .,..., •• ""'"' ~'"""'°"' Uw:iFO<Pn,jonWboot;..,, ·,. ,,,~ 1·; -':.ltl/7 :.t ' .• Tho ptojoct ,.;ii >t wo;,,c1 x, th• Ot(15EP~ o,d;"""''· +l-13'l, 0--1--0C, <+ tlal3t\Oottu,t>i,pie>b~ «><le••nd ,..ull':ioru i>•!ll'rnpr11to Tho -"I M,t;1,t1oo .... .....,, w~ I~ b< ;m..,l<O oo ,t,, ptCj>O»Od ""'!«t-""'"'"'''''"'"""''"rt"""'""'"'""''">dd .. ,,~,,,,....,,,,,,, ,.,..,..i "'"'"'"'' "'°"' ,ad _ .. ..,,,, '-' dtod ·- • ,,o;ee1,o.r!ft11:tlon,t,,•lt><"qu,,.dto<»mplywttntt,,,_,,,.,,.,,..,.,i,,und1o"".....,..1n,d G,o,.cnn.al (Ol'"'t<i"I 00>1$'> """•· ,:, .. ,,,,_., °" "'' , .... ,ppJ!a~• m...t bo ,. • ...,...i'" -·• to 1ur '*"" '°'""" """"-'•OD--•• DM<k>" t05Hou"1 ~<ado, Woy, ~'"'""· w~ ,.,..,, .. o.oo""" oo"""' a, ,au. ~ ,o,, ,-. q"'""""°""' 1tiis ""?<"-II, o, .,_,, ,o o, m,d,, "'"l'"''°""'" >ad <Moi.. >dd""""'lnodllca-by m,,, --tl>o ""lO<t "'"'l''·-.,.. '"""'it,._ .. "'"'"""" .. ~ ,...,m,tl<>afy i>ec<><M, P""'1 o! roco'<I ,..; .,;a, be ot<lffiod of ,nr d,d>lo• on tt,;, pro;.c'- CDNTACT PERSON: Jill Ding. Senior Planner; Tel: {425) 43o-6598; Eml: jding@~ntonwa.gov • '> ' -l' ,, Pl.EA!iE INC.UDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CIU.UNG FOR PROPER FILE IDElmACATION .o-L1.1."-"'o::i..---l....:.--1~"'--""'-' hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document us places or nearby the described property on Signed:_,~ 7n. YA/)Jv ss COUNTY OF KING My appointment expires: Notary (Print):\\ , ,;,::-s: h se.~ ~1-~ l( c)UiL( DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONbMIC:bEVELOPMENT · PLANNING DIVISION ' " ' AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BYMAILING. On the 15th day of April, 2014, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Notice of Application, Environmental Checklist documents. This information was sent to: Agencies See Attached See attached 300' surrounding property owners Todd Schutz Contact/ Applicant Harper Engineering Owner COUNTY OF KING template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology'"'* Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region * Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers* Seattle District Office Attn: $EPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers*** Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 AGENCY (DOE} LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW • Larry Fisher* 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 Ouwamish Tribal Office * 4717 W Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA 98106-1514 KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Environmental Planning Supervisor Ms. Shirley Marroquin 201 5. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 City of Newcastle Attn: Steve Roberge Director of Community Development 13020 Newcastle Way Newcastle, WA 98059 Puget Sound Energy Municipal Liaison Manager Joe Jainga PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-OlW Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept.* Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 39015 -172"d Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program* Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* Attn: Gretchen Kaehler PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Kent Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Acting Community Dev. Director 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 City of Tukwila Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. **Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov ***Department of Natural Resources ls emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice the following email address: sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov template -affidavit of service by mailing 1823059250 1823059254 2146000041 BNSF RAILWAY CO PROPERTY TAX DEPT NEPTUNE INVESTMENT LLC BECT LLC PO BOX 961089 PO BOX 838 PO BOX 749 FORT WORTH, TX 76161 MOUNT VERNON, WA 98273 KENT, WA 98035 2146000010 2146100031 9188000010 AMB PROPERTY CORP R L LAWLER INC HIGHLAND PLAZA PROPERTY LLC 60 STATE ST STE 1200 6411 77TH AVE SE MARSHALL LLC BOSTON, MA 2109 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 6100 219TH ST SW #535 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, WA 98043 1323049086 9188000030 2146000030 500 POWELL LLC C/0 BTV DEVELOPMENT PIETROMONACO I LL C W & R PROPERTIES LLC LP PO BOX 700 12715 BEL RED RD #100 2870 GATEWAY OAKS DR #110 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 BELLEVUE, WA 98005 SACRAMENTO, CA 95833 1823059270 194300000 194300000 HARPER O J+BESSIE MAE HEMDANI SALIM DIAZ MARCELA 700 SW 7TH 611 SW 5TH CT #A304 611 SW 5TH CT #A402 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98057 194300000 194300000 194300000 MORENO SYLVIA M+ROBERT JSR CRAN DALL STUART R JIANG ZHENMING+XIAOFENG WAN 611 SW 5TH CT #A-404 611 SW 5TH CT #A-407 701 SW 5TH CT #8101 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 194300000 194300000 194300000 EMSLEY ALLEN LY PHONG HUY MCKINNEY JAMES KYLE PO BOX 663 701 SE 5TH CT #8307 611 SW 5TH CT #A-101 WOODINVILLE, WA 98072 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 194300000 194300000 194300000 SANGH ERA VICTORS SHRESTHA SUNIL BROWN EUIN B 1705 POINTE WOODWORTH DR NE 611 SW 5TH CT #A406 701 SW 5TH CT #8103 TACOMA, WA 98422 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 194300000 194300000 194300000 CASO ARLENE A+ROSENDO MELCH BAHRAMPOUR BRAUM S INGRAM RUSSELL T 701 SW 5TH CT #6204 701 SW 5TH CT #6404 1100 S 99TH ST #20 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98057 SEATTLE, WA 98108 194300000 194300000 194300000 SOW IBRAHIMA+BOLO GADIAGA LI SAMMY+RONALD OKEEFFE JAMES N 611 SW 5TH CT #A201 611 SW 5TH CT #A-208 PO BOX 1803 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98057 SEATTLE, WA 98111 194300000 194300000 194300000 NGUYEN THU JESSON SUZANNE M ESLINGER MELISSA M 611 SW 5TH CT #A301 611 SW 5TH CT 701 SW 5TH CT #B-303 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 1943<)0000 194300000 194300000 SUMMERS SAMUELA C MACCUONG HIRNING CAROL-HONEY 611 SW 5TH CT #A107 611 SW 5TH CT #A403 611 SW 5TH CT #A106 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 194300000 194300000 194300000 ADAMS JOHNNIE R LO CINDY S GAO SIYING+YE YA 611 SW 5TH CT #A203 701 SW 5TH CT #405 611 SW 5TH CT #A202 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98057 194300000 194300000 194300000 CHESBRO BARBARA F HARIG KATHLEEN SUSANNE SAECHAO TORN FOU 611 SW 5TH CT #A205 611 SW 5TH CT #A-207 701 SW 5TH CT #6302 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 194300000 194300000 194300000 FELLIN GREGORY M RATIET CONNIE L NDWARU KAREN+ALEX T THAM BO 6947 COAL CREEK OKWY SE #320 22748 SE 27TH ST 611 SW 5TH CT #405 NEWCASTLE, WA 98059 SAMMAMISH, WA 98075 RENTON, WA 98055 194300000 194300000 194300000 TAN RAYMOND Y+WAN X HU DANG KHOA+PHUONG DO WOOD JOSHUA 611 SW 5TH CT #A206 PO BOX 1437 611 SW 5TH CT #A305 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 194300000 194300000 194300000 CLARK MICHAEL scon TZENG CRYSTAL C MODICA BEVLERY G 701 SW 5TH CT #6203 611 SW 5TH CT #A204 701 SW 15TH CT #6202 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 194300000 194300000 194300000 AXIS GRAND CONDO LLC C/0 WASATCH HWANG SZEYAN+SZE MING+SZE W CASTILLO JEREMIAH Z ACQUI & CAP INC 701 SW 5TH CT #6306 611 SW 5TH CT #Al05 595 S RIVERWOODS PKWY #400 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 LOGAN, UT 84321 194300000 194300000 194300000 ZHU JIANJUN PRIETO MARIA ELENA WALKER TYLER D+COCOS LUCIAN 611 SW 5TH CT #A401 611 SW 5TH CT #A-307 701 SW 5TH CT #B 104 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98056 194300000 194300000 194300000 ADAN ABDIAZIS RAMOS MELANIA S EPPENS LAWRENCE R 701 SW 5TH CT #6108 701 SW 5TH CT #B 304 701 SW 5TH CT #B305 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 194300000 194300000 194300000 ORNELAS JORGE DAWSON MARY G TOLENTINO JOSE+MARITES 701 SW 5TH CT #B-406 11002 FOREST AVES 701 SW 5TH CT #B208 RENTON, WA 98055 SEATILE, WA 98178 RENTON, WA 98055 19431:JOOOO 194300000 194300000 GRAY HENRY A+RUBY GROBE FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE A DOSS SARAH 611 SW 5TH CT #Al02 PO BOX 650043 701 SW 5TH CT #8105 RENTON, WA 98057 DALLAS, TX 75265 RENTON, WA 98055 194300000 194300000 194300000 BENNETI AARONS GUILLERMO EMERSON D+MARIA T WEST SARAH M 701 SW 5TH CT #B-201 611 SW 5TH CT #A-306 701 SW 5TH CT #8-102 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 194300000 194300000 194300000 ZIMPFER ANDREW N MCCLARTY MARK A YE JENNY+DICH THANG 701 SW 5TH CT #8206 701 SW 5TH CT #8107 611 SW 5TH CT #A104 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 194300000 194300000 194300000 FINKBEINER ROBYN BAILEY RUTH HILL BILL 611 SW 5TH CT #A302 701 SW 5TH CT #8301 701 SW 5TH CT #8-308 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 194300000 194300000 194300000 ALEMU MESERET METIKU TIBEBE SELAM LAO JOHN 701 SW STH CT #8-403 611 SW 5TH CT #A308 701 SW 5TH CT #B402 RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 0 Ill r .,,,+ NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CEO) -Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: LAND USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: April 15, 2014 LUA14-000454, ECF, SA-A Harper Engineering PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Approval for the addition of 8,312 square feet including a 5,660 square foot first floor addition and a 2,652 square foot second story addition. The proposed addition would result In the removal of 22 parking stalls and the replacement of 14 parking stalls, resulting in a net loss of 8 parking stalls for a total of 84 parking stalls available on the project site. The project site is located in the Medium Industrial (lM) zone. Access to the site is proposed via existing driveways off of SW 7th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the project site. PROJECT LOCATION: 7005Wt" Ave OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (ONS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a ONS-- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significan·ce- Mitigated (DNS·M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: April 7, 2014 April 15, 2014 APPLICANT /PROJECT CONT ACT PERSON: Todd Schutz/Craft Archltects/2505 Third Ave Suite 324, Seattle, WA 98121/eml:todd@craftarchitects.eom Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Administrative Site Plan Review Building, Construction Drainage Report, Geotechnlcal Report Department of Community & Economic Development {CEO) -Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 96057 The subject site is designated Employment Area Valley (COMP-EAV) on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Medium Industrial {IM) on the City's Zoning Map. If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED-Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: Harper Engineering/LUA14-000454, ECF, SA-A NAME:---------------------------------- MAJ LING ADDRESS: ________________ City/State/Zip: __________ _ TELEPHONE NO.: -------------- Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Proposed Mitigation Measures: Environmental {SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, 4-2-130, 4-4-070, 4-4- 080 and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. Project construction shall be required to comply with the recommendations found in the submitted Geotechnical Engineering Design Study. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jill Ding, Senior Planner, CED-Planning D[vlslon, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on April 29, 2014. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Jill Ding, Senior Planner; Tel: (425) 430-6598; Eml: jding@rentonwa.gov .... -\..:~·· c$,. ~ ... ~!!-~: PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION April 15, 2014 Todd Schutz Craft Architects 2505 Third Ave Suite 324 . Seattle, WA 98121 Department of Community and Economic Development C.E. "Chip"Vincent, Administrator Subject: Notice of Complete Application Harper Engineering, LUA14-0004S4, ECF, SA-A Dear Mr. Schutz: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete accordingto submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on May 12, 2014. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-6598 if you have any questjons. ]?1t:t2· Jill Ding u Senior Planner cc: Harper Engineering/ Owner(s) Renton_(ity Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT '' ii,:,,. {l ·T MASTER APPLICATIONc,;'° J •• 'wJ' ,.',., ,• . ;, ,/; ~,.--.' PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: Harper Engineering PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Harper Engineering ADDRESS: 700 SW 7th Ave, PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)ILOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 700 SW 7th Ave, Renton, WA 98055 CITY: Renton 98055 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 255-0414 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 182305-9270 APPLICANT (if other than owner) Todd Schutz NAME: EXISTING LAND USE(S): Commercial Office Building/Manufacturing Craft Architects COMPANY (if applicable): PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Commercial Office Building/Manufacturing ADDRESS: 2505 Third Ave Suite 324 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: EAY CITY: Seattle 98121 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable) N/A TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206 720-7001 EXISTING ZONING: Industrial Medium CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): NIA NAME: Todd Schutz SITE AREA (in square feet): 96,749 sq. ft. COMPANY (if applicable): Craft Architects SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: 2,077 sq. ft. ADDRESS: 2505 Third Ave Suite 324 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: 0 CITY: Seattle 98121 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable) NIA TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) 206 720-7001 todd@craftarchitects.com N/A NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): N/A Z:\_ProJects\_Pro_]ects-CURRf:N I \Harper Engmeenng\(2) Park mg Expans1on\3-Documents\l-C1ty Correspondcncc\SEPA \14-0325 _ Harper Engmecnng Master Pennit.doc -l -03/11 • p JECT INFORMATION (con1 1ed) NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: $$800,000 N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): D AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL D AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS (if applicable): 5,660 sa. ft. D FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable) D GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. 20,765 D HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): D SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES sq. ft. 32,725 sa. ft. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW D WETLANDS sq. ft. PROJECT (if applicable): 5 - LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach leaal descriotion on separate sheet with the followina information included) SITUATE IN THE SW QUARTER OF SECTION _18_, TOWNSHIP 23N, RANGE 5E , INTHE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) Todd Schutz, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that I am (please check one) __ the current owner of the property involved in this application or X the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 3/2.8/l'-J Date Signature of Owner/Representative Signature of Owner/Representative Date STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) ss ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that -rob"t:> Sc_i-1v--r 7- signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the ---~,!~,.,.,..,.,...-"1 MARK A U\RSON NOTARY PUBLIC STATE Of WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES AUGUST 9. 2015 uses and purpose mentioned in the instrument. ~ !· A 3/-zV3 /-Zo1f / ~-~--,yL---~~----_-_-_-_-_-_-__ _ Dated Notary Public in and for tHe State of Washington Notary (Print): t,,\e,a.-v.:. /:+ v l'>-11,·So ,-.) My appointment expires: 5 / "I / Z..01 S Z:\_Projccts\_Projects-CURRENT\Harper Engineering\(2) Parking Expansion\3-Documents\ I-City Correspondence\SEPA \ 14-0325 _ Harper Engineering Master Permit.doc -2-03/11 PLANNING DIVISION WAIVEl _ JF SUBMITTAL REQUIR . IENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY: Calculations 1 Colored Maps for Display 4 Construction Mitigation Description ,AND• Deed of Right-of-Way Dedication Density Worksheet 4 ,\N Drainage Control Plan 2 Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Architectural 3 AND 4 Environmental Checklist 4 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy) 4_ . Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood Hazard Data 4 Floor Plans , AND• Geotechnical Report 2 AND, Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan, Detailed 2 Habitat Data. Report 4 sJR Improvement Deferral 2 Irrigation Plan 4 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 Landscape Plan, Conceptual• Landscape Plan, Detailed 4 Legal Description 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one per monument) 1 Neighborhood Detail Map, Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 Post Office Approval., . This requirement may be waived bf 1. Property Services 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building PROJECT NAME: DATE: H:vrpvr-Cr0 i "m.= to= 1 \IE [) '/"''/U I ,._; I ' .APR O 7 ?r,,,1 4. Planning ClTY Gf ;;::NTON H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-He!p Handouts\Plannlng\waiverofsubrninalreqs 06/09 PLANNING DIVISION WAIVE .. OF SUBMITTAL REQUIF.-.VIENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY: Plat Name Reservation 4 Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 Public Works Approval Letter 2 Rehabilitation Plan 4 ... Screening Detail 4 . Shoreline Tracking Worksheet 4 Site Plan 2 AND 4 Stream or Lake Study, Standard 4 SB- Stream. or Lake Study, Supplemental 4 . Stream or Lake Mitigation Plan 4 .· Street Profiles 2 Title Report or Plat Certificate• . Topography Map, - Traffic Study 2 (__ 'I- Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4 c.) ~ ) Urban Design Regulations Analysis 4 ,'\JJ Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final 4 Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4 Wetlands ReporVDelineation 4 ~L) Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2 AND, Photosimulations 2 AND, . This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building PROJECT NAME: --1.H:..L-.icCCL.f::f"!=:::!........!%~-:.;:.·:i.;.'.i..:Y',W:<:~L..Ci...:.,7];:J,..--- DATE: _..:..,'-/ /c_3:.....,/c...:..J_"1 _____ _ 4. Planning H:\CED\Data\Forms·Templates\Self-Hetp Handouts\Planning\waiverofsubmi~!reqs 06109 ' PREAPPLICATION MEETING FOR Harper Engineering Addition 700 SW 7th Street PRE 13-001299 CITY OF RENTON Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division October 10, 2013 f<FCEIVED Contact Information: APR 0 7 21114 Planner: Gerald C. Wasser, 425.430. 7382 C!i'f Public Works Plan Reviewer: Jan Illian, 425.430.7216 Fire Prevention Reviewer: Corey Thomas, 425.430.7024 Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell, 425.430.7290 ( A-'¢S't:.\'tl·) Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work on the project. You will need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply for land use and/or environmental permits. Pre-screening: When you have the project application ready for submittal, call and schedule an appointment with the project manager to have it pre-screened before making all of the required copies. The pre-application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Development Services Director, Department of Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator and City Council). Fire & Emergericv Services. Department • MEMORANDUM ·------···-··········-···-··----- DATE: TO: FROM: Corey Thomas, Plan Rev1i:.~,,v/!nspector SUBJECT: [HarpH Engineering Expansion) PRE13-001299 of ----------------------- 1. The preliminary fire flovJ :--equirement is 21 250 gprn based on a fully fire s::irinklerPd budding, A minimum of three fire hydrants ,;ce n~qu1red. One fire hydrant is required within bO-feet of the proposed building ,rnd two hydrants within 300 feet Exisl ing hydrants ;3re adequate 2. The fire im;Jact ff'f·,-, ::itt' 2pplicable at the rate of $0.08 per square foot ot manufactur1ng ue;1. Fees arr. µaid at time of biillding pen"".lit issuance. 3 The existing fire a!ar:,1 dnd tire '.'>prinkler system are required to be extended into the proposed add!rion. Sepura-::e p!ans and perrn1t.s Me required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for review and permitting_ The propo-:;,_,d building addition appears to be covering the existing fire sprinkler supply main, t':""lis is prohibited by codi~ ,rnd the main shJI! be relocated prior tu the addition construction 4. Existing firp depa.t:~:ent 2pp3ratus access roads arc adequate .5. ;ipptlcant shail s1,ibnit d completed Haldrdous MateriJi mventory Staterrent prior to building permit issuance. Use of ciW forrri or approved equivalent is required. 6. An electronic s:tc pian is required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Dep<1rtment for pre-f:re pl;:inning purposes prier to occu~,a;·;;::y c,f the building. DEPARTMENT OF COMMU~"TY AND FCONOMIC DEVELOPMENT fVIEMOF1ANDUM DA Tr: l :J./g/2013 12:00:00At.!\ ro: f ~~OM: JJn Illian, Plan Reviewer SUBJECT: (HJrper Engineering Expansion) Pf{t.~3 001299 ·----------------·---------------------------- NOTE: The applicant is Ci.Jutioned 1hat information contained in th;s ;:,urnrnary 1$ preHrnin;;iry and non-bindine, ..:ind m;.1y not subject to rnoddication ;1nd/or concurrence by official cty decision-makers. Review comments may aiso need to be revised b,1;~,d on site planning and other dec:.ig'.1 changes required by City staff or mad{: by the applicant ! h~we completed a preiin;in0ry review for the above-referenced propcsa!. The following comments are b;::;sed tY1 the pre~application :,ubrr:ittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant. \'\later L The project is v;ithin the C<:v's water service area in the DuwntoiN1! 196 tiydraulic pressure ::or.E _ There ls an existirg 12-inch water main 1r SW /th that cdn deliver 5,000 gprn. The stzitic WJter pressure rs about 65 P'>i at ground rdevJt1on of 40 feet. ) . The;e is. an ex1st1:-ig tire line Jnd double detector check valve assc1nb!y (DDCVAj in a vault s:c:rv1n;-; the fire sprinkler system lD the ~xi:.ting building ·t. rhere is a 1-1/2 inch domestic water meter serving the existinp, bui.ding at 700 SW 7th Street. 4. A systPrr1 developnwnt fr;r· for w,1tt~r will be owed lf the size of tb:' exi;,ti".g :fon1estic \\.'Jter mete; .r1Gcascs or addftlonal meters are z:idded based on the proposed exp;,in:,ion S;:mitary Sewer l. ; here is em existirig ~Hnch ~,12wer rnain in SW 7th Street. There i::, a side sc>wi:r serving thE: t:xi:,ting bt,;ilding, 2. A system dcvc-!oprm'nt '.H• for sewer wi!! be owed if the-st1e of the ex:~,ting domestic water meter ,ncrf'a'>e-~ or i1dditional mett::rs are .added bJ.sed on the proposed expansion Storm Drainage ; Drainage pi.111.s a11d dr;iin;Jge report shall comply with the 2009 <:ng Countv SiidJce Viater l'v1anuJl and the 2009 Citv of R.ento;1 AnsenCnatn'. '> ;o ihe KCSWM, Chapters 1 ~=nd 2 ,\II wre ;wt..i any speci.:il requirr..:m•!nts sh;d! h0 rnnt;iin'::'.d in the re;:i(Jr' .. 3a~ed on the C1t"y'r, flnv,1 conuu! rnap. t 1·w, site fa!!~ withi11 tt·t> P:;ak Raie r:low Cnntrol Star,d,~rd, Existing Site Csmditio:1,;. The dr;1inagc report w !! ;1eel: to follow the area specif:c f ,;i-..N co,1tro! r~quiremenL 1nldcr Core Rf:quirernent #3. 3. Surf;iu~ Water S'{St,;1--:~ Ue·;,:.:!::.>nr:v~nt fees of SOA:18 per square ~001 ,:-,' ,-cw impervious surfa::.e w;H ,~pr:dy. : ;..1!s ::. p<1y"Jbie prior io \S\lldi.'.\' :J' :he construction pcrrnit r nmpurtatior Page 1 Df 2 ',:, 4. AH wir:". utlit:c:.i sh~1:: b ~ 11"'' t_-·ided 1:ndt'ft~round per t:le C ty nf Rentnr1 l> ,:-:;::r (~·-ouncrnf; Crd:n2nn.:: 'f ti rec or rno;'l~ po!i:~s are reqsJ:r~;i11 1 iJi,; rn:Jvc,d by the dc.vclopr;1cnt de.s:gn, ,1!1 pJ:iq1-lf: overhead 11~1:1~_1e<., :,h,:1' be p!act7d unc.\:-rp,rnund. ;\nv 11e:,v c.r,rv1c.es shall be insta:lec un:)Prgrnund. Gener.1! Cornrne.nts l. All construction ·..;tl!;ty pr:r~~T':. for utilities, drainage, and street ;rnpro1.:ernents will require sep.:trvtc rjan subrnitta!s. Al! utihtv plans ',h.iii conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Phns shall be prepared by J licensed Civil Engineer. 2. Any proposed rocke,1es Ur' r,:taining walls greater than four feet in height \Niii require a sepMdt.e building permtt and spec:a1 insµecricn 3. Separ2te perm:ts and fees •or ,.voter meters, side sewers, and backflow de\/ices are required. 4. \Vhen the-utility plans are complete, please submit three (3) co pie::. of the drawings, two (2} copies of :he drainage report, permit app <at1on, <1r1d an it'Pmiz-ed cost of ;:onstruction estimate and appltcat:un ff:P dl the counter 0:1 the sixth floor. A fee vJork:,heet ls attached for your u~e. but prior to preparing 2 check. it iS r€·cornrnendcd to ca!i 4:t>BO-l2b6 for a foe estimate as generdteJ by the oern-dt svstem_ Page 2 ot· 2 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: M E M O R A N D U M October 10, 2013 Pre-application File No. 13-001299 Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner Harper Engineering Addition ---·-·······-·----------··-···-···················-· General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator, Planning Director, Development Services Director, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or on line at www.rentonwa.gov Project Proposal: The subject property is located at 700 SW 7'' Street and consists of two parcels (APN 1823059036 and APN 1823059270). The project site is flat. The property is zoned Industrial Medium {IM) and is within the Employment Area Valley. The applicant is proposing to construct a surface level parking lot for 42 vehicles on the northerly parcel which would be connected to the southerly parcel across the BNSF railroad tracks and a 5,600 s.f. addition to the existing manufacturing building on the southern parcel. The proposed building addition would require the removal of 27 parking stalls. i\ccess to the site would remain from SW 7'' Street. Current Use: The northern property (APM 182305-9036) is vacant and the southern parcel (APN 1823059270) is currently developed with offices/laboratories and the Harper Engineering manufacturing facility. Zoning: The subject property is zoned Industrial Medium (IM) and is located in the Employment Area Valley Overlay. h:\ced\pla nning\c urrent plann lne,\preapps\13-DO 1299 .fi f izabeth\pr eO 13-001299, harper engineering, nn. due !l;ll pu t·nKinccnng Addit1-...1,l, !1HE13 {101299 Page-2 of 3 October llJ, 20B Development Standards: The project would be subject to RMC 4-2-130A, "Development Standards for Industrial Zoning Designations" effective at the time of complete application. A copy of these standards is included. Access/Parking: The applicant has indicated that access would continue to be taken from driveways off of SW th Street. There are currently 93 parking spaces on the project site including 4 accessible spaces. The parking space ratio for manufacturing uses is a minimum of 1 space to a maximum of 1.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of net floor area, The two-way traffic flow in the new parking area provides for Z4-foot wide aisles, consistent with Code provisions. A maximum of 40% of employee stalls may be compact (8-1/2' x 16') or a maximum of 30% of all other parking stalls may be compact. Standard stalls are required to be 9' x ZO'. A total of 19 of the proposed 4Z new stalls are proposed to be compact parking stalls. Twenty-five of the existing parking stalls are also compact. A parking modification may be possible, if the maximum number of compact stalls is exceeded. Each modification requested is subject to an additional fee (see below). The applicant has noted that preliminary discussions have taken place with the BNSF railroad in order to obtain a wider easement across the railroad tracks . Prior to issuance of any building permits for the new parking area, and final occupancy of the building addition, which relies on the new parking, a completed easement document would be required to be provided to the City. Refuse and Recycling: It appears that the applicant has not changed the size of the refuse/recycling enclosure. Office uses require a minimum of 2 square feet of recyclable area per 1,000 gross square feet of floor area and 4 square feet of refuse area per 1,000 gross square feet of floor area; manufacturing uses require a minimum of 3 square feet of recyclables area per 1,000 gross square feet of floor area and 6 square feet of refuse area per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. The formal submittal must indicate compliance with these requirements. Landscaping and Open Space: No additional landscaping is proposed for the site. The applicant indicates that a parking lot landscape island would be removed to accommodate the proposed addition. landscaping in the reconfigured existing and newly proposed parking lot must be in conformance RMC 4-4-070. Significant Tree Retention: It appears that several trees would be removed to accommodate the proposed development. In the IM Zone, 5% of the existing significant trees (6-inch diameter) must be retained. If removal of additional trees is authorized, the replacement ratio is 6:1 with a minimum caliper of Z-inches. A tree retention/removal/replacement plan must be submitted with the formal land use application. h: \c ed\pla rm i ng\cur rent pla nn in g\prea pp s \ 13-001. 209. e! iza beth \preO l3·-0012 99, harper cngi neeri ng, tm.doc Harper engineering /\dditio .. , PR.E'l3-D012IJ9 Page 3 of 3 Ocluber 10, 701:l Environmental Review: Because the proposed project area contains a wetland, an Environmental (SEPA) Review would be required, A wetland delineation is required to be submitted. The fee for Environmental (SEPA) Review is $1,030.00 ($1,000,00 plus 3% Technology Surcharge Fee). Permit Requirements: An approved Administrative Site Plan Review would be required for the proposed project. The application fee for an Administrative Site Plan Review would be $1,030.00 ($1,000.00 plus 3% Technology Surcharge Fee. The administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental (SEPAi Review would be processed concurrently in an estimated time frame of 6 to 8 weeks . . Parking Modification: A modification from the Parking and Loading Standards may be needed for the number of compact parking stalls proposed. If a modification is needed, the fee is $100 plus the 3% Technology Fee ($103 total). Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction fees, impact fees are required. Such fees apply to all projects and would be calculated at the time of building permit application and payable prior to building permit issuance. The fees for 2013 are as follows: • Transportation Impact Fee -$0.29/square foot ($1.09/square foot in 2014); and • Fire Impact Fee -$0.08/square foot {will remain the same in 2014) a A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees is attached for your review. Note: When formal application materials are complete, the applicant must make an appointment with the project manager, Gerald Wasser, ta have one copy of the application materials pre-screened at the 6th public counter prior to submitting the complete application package. Mr. Wasser may be contacted at {425} 430-7382 or gwosser@rentonwa.gov. Expiration: Upon approval, Administrative Site Plan Review is valid for two years with a possible two-year extension. h: \ced\pla nni ng\cu r rent planning \prea pps\13 001299. eli ,a beth \pre013-001299, harper engineer in!,, im.doc PRE13w001299 Harper Eng. Expansion 0 Ci~on Finan .. i.· & IT Plvisinn ·.-:1 I J f'l ·'>1; C March, 28 2014 City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98057 City of Renton Planning Division: The following letter is a project narrative providing a description of the proposed project for submittal for environmental review. Project Name: Harper Engineering Building Addition Site Location: 700 SW 7th Street Tax Parcel: 182305-9270 Zoning Designation: IM (Industrial Medium) The site is currently fully developed and consists of a 24,440 SF tilt-up concrete building. The existing building is comprised of manufacturing space and a (2) story office component as well as 92 surface parking stalls to serve the site. Proposed improvements on the site include a new 5,660 SF building addition to increase the facilities manufacturing space. The addition would also include a 2,652 SF 2"d story (used strictly for storage) bringing the total additional square footage to 8,312 SF. As a result of this addition we have eliminated 22 parking stalls but have replaced 14 parking stalls resulting in a net loss of 8 parking stalls, for a total of 84 parking stalls. This meets the parking requirements per the City of Renton Municipal Code. Also as a result of the addition there is a minimal amount of parking area landscaping/trees that will be removed. The total estimated cost for the proposed development is approximately $800,000.00. The soil types present on the site are as follows, per the geotechnical report by Hart Crowser dated 7/3/07 "In general, the upper portion of the site is underlain by very soft Silt and Clay that contain variable amounts of fine sand. These soft compressible soils generally extend to a depth of about 7 to 17 feet. Beneath this highly compressible zone, we encountered loose to medium dense Sand with varying amounts of gravel. Generally, the Sand becomes medium dense at a depth of 13 to 24 feet and then dense at a depth of about 25 to 35 feet. At a depth of about 64 feet, we encountered hard, sandy Silt." Access to the site will be provided by two existing curb cuts off of SW 7th Street. No additional curb cuts are proposed at this time. However it is our understanding that new street improvements are planned along SW 7th Avenue consisting of a new trail on the north side of the street. This is a public project that will take 8' of Harper Engineering property along SW yth Avenue. . ' 2505 Third Avenue, Suite 324 Seattle Washington 98121 Phone 206.720.7001 Fax 206.720.2949 \ 9188000030 ~r ~ t--------------,/ ! ci 0 " ·a i'i l ! :I ;;; ::l ~ ~r 9188000020 2146100015 ;c~ g architects 0 N 18 2146100031 "' "SI- N 1823059036 9188000010 1823059254 ~ ~ I SW7THST. ~ 0 ~ N 0 0 2146000010 0 2146000030 <I 2146000041 0 "' ... frl N z YJ NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP N HARPER ENGINEERING ADDITION $ 700 SW 7TH STREET 3/28/14 SCALE, 1'•200' 1823059251 0 ~ "' C, C, ~ C, C, 1923059056 "' ... N 0 z :::J ·"" r·-·-,._ ,-~;;. 1 r-;-.. 1 I ,., ·l··_· ·-i --i _.--1· • '-. . ,, '~ -- APR C 7 111 -'} CT: 'f <__. -·. · ~ • l 1-11, .. H-~..,.........,. · ·· · l\nrcrf' ENGINEERING C March, 28 2014 Harper Engineering Addition Construction Mitigation Description • Proposed Construction Dates: Construction will begin summer of 2014 and end on by spring of 2015. • Hours of Operation: Construction activities will take place generally Monday -Friday from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm • Proposed Haul Route: North on Rainier Ave. N. from either 1-405 or SR 167. Rainier Ave. N. to SW 7th Street. West on SW 7th Street to the site. • Measures to be implemented to minimize dust, traffic and transportation impacts, erosion, mud noise and other noxious characteristics: A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan will be designed and implemented to City of Renton standards. The site will be watered as necessary to control dust and catch basin inserts will be installed to minimize silt laden water from entering the storm system. All construction equipment will meet State noise and emission standards and construction will be limited to daylight hours. All construction activities will be conducted on-site and no impact to traffic along SW 7th Street is anticipated. 2505 Third Avenue, Suite 324 Seattle Washington 98121 Phone 206.720.7001 Fax 206.720.2949 C March, 28 2014 Harper Engineering Addition Landscape Analysis, Lot Coverage and Parking Analysis • Total square footage of site and footprints of all buildings: Total site square footage Footprint of existing building Footprint of building addition = 96,749 sf (2.21 Acres) = 21,560 sf = 5,660 sf • Total square footage of impervious surface areas: 83,054 sf of total impervious surface. • Square footage (by floor and overall total) of each building: 1" floor existing building 1" floor addition 2nd floor existing building 2nd floor addition Total = 21,560 sf = 5,660 sf = 2,880 sf = 2652sf = 32,752 sf • Percentage of lot covered by buildings or structures: 32,752 sf building area / 96,749 sf site area = 33.9% • Number of parking space required by code: 6,760 sf Office @ 2 stalls/1,000 sf 23,340 sf Manufacturing@ 1 stall/1,000 sf 2,652 sf Warehouse @ 1 stall/1,500 sf Additional stalls required per agreement with PSE Total = 14 stalls required = 23 stalls required = 2 stalls required = 45 stalls = 84 stalls required • Number and dimensions of parking stalls provided: Standard Stalls (9'x20') Compact Stalls (8'-6"x16') ADA Stalls (9'x20') Total = 46 stalls provided = 34 stalls provided = 4 stalls provided = 84 stalls provided • Square footage of parking lot landscaping (perimeter and interior) 13, 965 sf of total landscaping '1-1 ·• . 11 i((-7 2505 Third Avenue, Suite 324 Seattle Washington 98121 Phone 206.720.7001 Fax 206.720.2949 City of Renton TREE RETENTION WORKSHEET 1. Total number of trees over 6" in diameter1 on project site: 1. trees -------0 2. Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation: Trees that are dead, diseased or dangerous2 Trees in proposed public streets Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts Trees in critical areas 3 and buffers Total number of excluded trees: 3. Subtract line 2from line 1: 2. 3. ____ trees trees ---- ____ trees ____ trees o trees ------- ___ o~ __ trees 4. Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained 4 , multiply line 3 by: 0.3 in zones RC, R-1, R-4, or R-8 0.1 in all other residential zones 0.05 in all commercial and industrial zones 4. --~o ___ trees 5. List the number of 6" or larger trees that you are proposing5 to retain 4 : 5. O trees 6. Subtract line 5from line 4 for trees to be replaced: (If line 6 is less than zero, stop here. No replacement trees are required). 6. --~o ___ trees 7. Multiply line 6 by 12" for number of required replacement inches: 7. o inches --~---- 8. Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement: (Minimum 2" caliper trees required) 8. --~0~---inches 9. Divide line 7by line Bfor number of replacement trees6 : (if remainder is .5 or greater, round up to the next whole number) 1 · Measured at chest height. per tree 9. o trees 2 Dead, diseased or dangerous trees must be certified as such by a forester, registered landscape architect, or certified arborist, and approved by the City. 3 Critical Areas, such as wetlands, streams, floodplains and protected slopes, are defined in Section 4-3-050 J~ F(' 1=:"f VF the Renton Municipal Code (AMC). ·· .rt::, .: D 4 Count only those trees to be retained outside of critical areas and buffers. A P,L~ Q 7 : ~ 1 s. The City may require modification of the tree retention plan to ensure retention of the maximum number c(;r:··,,· trees per AMC 4-4-130H7a _ · ' ;-·(_A.;\J\ii,w. , · ''._: :'; J 6-Inches of street trees, inches of trees added to critical areas/buffers, and inches of trees retained on site that ·-· L;, V.IS/0/v are less than 6" but are greater than 2" can be used to meet the tree replacement requirement. H: \C ED\Data \Forms-T emptates\Sel f-Help Handouts \Planning\ T reeRetention Worksheet .doc 12/08 March 18, 2011 ES-2004 Earth Solutions NW LLC Craft Architects 2505 Third Avenue, Suite 324 Seattle, Washington 98121 Attention: Kathy Craft Subject: Proposed Warehouse Addition Harper Engineering 700 Southwest 7'h Street Renton, Washington References: Hart Crowser Dear Kathy: Geotechnical Engineering Design Study July 18, 2007 Rainier Surveying Harper Engineering Settlement Plate Monitoring Results March 7, 2008 DCI Engineers Harper Engineering Addition Sheets S1 .1 through S4.1, January 25, 2011 • Geotechnical Engineering • Construction Monitoring • Environmental Sciences f1C .... ,_r· ,,;;, ( ,-/\IEO· ~ .... ·' .\. . ' '" ·-·' ' rp (' Hf r( 1 7 2rJq C;, / ·:· ~~ '; .~ t ·--·; .;! '•,.·;:~.<).\.' In accordance with your request, Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) has prepared this letter to provide geotechnical recommendations for the construction of an addition to the north side of the existing Harper Engineering building. Our scope of services for this project included a site visit to observe the existing site conditions, review of the referenced documents and preparation of this letter. Based on the referenced DCI plans, the addition will be located on the north side of the existing building and will add approximately 44 feet to the length of the building. The footprint of the addition is currently paved with asphalt. Based on our experience with similar buildings, we anticipate the foundation loads will be in the range of 80 to 100 kips for column loads and two to four kips per foot for wall loads. Slab on grade loads are anticipated to be 150 pounds per square foot (psf) or less. 1805 -136th Place N.E., Suite 201 • Bellevue, WA 98005 • (425) 449-4704 • FAX (425) 449-4711 Craft Architects March 18, 2011 Soil Conditions ES-2004 Page2 The soil conditions at the location of the proposed addition consist of approximately 12 feet of very soft to soft silt and loose silty sand, based on the logs of subsurface explorations included in the referenced Hart Crowser study. These soils are underlain by medium dense to dense sand. Existing Building Construction Based on recommendations in the referenced Hart Crowser study, the existing building was supported on shallow spread foundations after the completion of a surcharge program. The surcharge program consisted of the placement of 6.5 feet of fill above the finish floor elevation. Hart Crowser recommended the surcharge extend ten feet beyond the building perimeter. The foundations were supported by a four foot layer of structural fill. The settlement induced by the surcharge program is documented in the referenced Harper Engineering monitoring results. A total of eight settlement monitoring plates were measured by Harper. The total measured settlement ranged from 3 to 4.5 inches. Based on the Harper data, the surcharge was in place for approximately nine weeks. Recommendations Based on our review of the referenced documents, the building can be supported on shallow spread foundations bearing on structural fill after the completion of a surcharge program. In order to reduce the potential for differential settlement between the addition and the original building, the surcharge program for the addition should apply nearly the same weight per square foot as the original surcharge program (approximately 780 psf). Alternatively, if the risk of up to one inch of differential settlement between the addition and the existing building can be accepted, the surcharge weight can be reduced to 500 psf. This letter has been prepared for the exclusive use of Craft Architects and their representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This letter has been prepared in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. Site Preparation and Earthwork Earthwork for this project is anticipated to consist mainly of excavations for preparation of foundation subgrade and preparation of the slab subgrade. New structural fill will be placed for support of the foundations and floor slab. Structural fill is defined as compacted fill placed under buildings, roadways, slabs, pavements and other load bearing areas. Structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 12 inches in loose thickness and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM D-1557 (Modified Proctor). The structural fill must be placed at or near its optimum moisture content. Structural fill under pavements and walks should be compacted to 95 percent in the upper two feet. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Craft Architects March 18, 2011 ES-2004 Page 3 The on-site soils that will be encountered in excavations is highly moisture sensitive. Compaction of these soils to the levels necessary for use as structural fill will be difficult or impossible during wet weather conditions. If the moisture content of the soil is near the optimum level, the soil can be used as structural fill. However, the stability of the compacted soil will degrade if exposed to wet weather and/or construction traffic. Imported soil intended for use as structural fill should consist of a well graded granular soil with a moisture content that is at or near the optimum level. During wet weather conditions, imported soil intended for use as structural fill should consist of a well graded granular soil with a fines content of 5 percent or less defined as the percent passing the #200 sieve, based on the minus % inch fraction. Surcharge Program As discussed above, in order to reduce the potential for differential settlement between the addition and the original building, the surcharge program for the addition should apply nearly the same weight per square foot as the original surcharge program (approximately 780 psf). Alternatively, if the risk of up to one inch of differential settlement between the addition and the existing building can be accepted, the surcharge weight can be reduced to 500 psf, which correlates to 4.5 feet of soil. Other materials can be considered to provide the weight necessary for the surcharge, such as ecology blocks or Baker tanks filled with water. Based on the data from the surcharge for the original building, the duration of the surcharge is anticipated to range from two to three months. The settlement induced by the surcharge program is expected to be in the range of 3 to 4.5 inches for a surcharge weight of 780 psf and approximately 2 to 3.5 inches for a surcharge weight of 500 psf. The full height of the surcharge material must extend beyond the limits of the addition footprint a minimum of five feet. The full height of the surcharge must be placed no further than ten feet from the north wall of the existing building. If soil is used as the surcharge material, concrete blocks should be used to retain the fill parallel to the north wall of the existing building. Where surcharge materials are placed, settlement markers should be installed to monitor the fill induced settlements. ESNW can supply and install the settlement markers. The settlement markers should be placed prior to beginning the surcharge placement, and monitored daily during the placement. Following completion of the surcharge placement, readings should be acquired weekly until it is determined by ESNW that the surcharge program has been successfully completed. ESNW should be retained to implement and perform the surcharge program. Monitoring points should be established at a minimum of two locations on the north wall of the existing building prior to placement of surcharge material. The elevation of the monitoring points should be surveyed weekly while the surcharge is in place. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Craft Architects March 18, 2011 Foundations ES-2004 Page4 The proposed addition can be supported on conventional spread and continuous footings bearing on three feet of structural fill. The following parameters can be used for design of the new foundations: • Allowable soil bearing capacity • Passive earth pressure • Coefficient of friction 2,000 psf 300 pcf (equivalent fluid) 0.35 The passive earth pressure and coefficient of friction values include a factor of safety of 1.5. The passive earth pressure is applicable for foundations backfilled with structural fill. A one- third increase in the allowable soil bearing capacity can assumed for short-term wind and seismic loading conditions. Excavations and Slopes The Federal and state Occupation Safety and Health Administration (OSHA/WISHA) classifies soils in terms of minimum safe slope inclinations. The soil that will be exposed by the foundation excavations would be classified by OSHA/WISHA as Type C. Temporary slopes over four feet in height in Types C soils should be sloped no steeper than 1H:1.5V (Horizontal:Vertical). If temporary slopes cannot be constructed in accordance with OSHA/WISHA guidelines, temporary shoring may be necessary. Slab-On-Grade Floors The slab-on-grade floor for the addition should be supported on a firm and unyielding subgrade consisting of existing competent fill or new structural fill. Unstable or yielding areas of the subgrade should be recompacted or overexcavated and replaced with suitable structural fill prior to construction of the slab. A capillary break consisting of a minimum of four inches of free draining crushed rock or gravel should be placed below the slab. The free draining material should have a fines content of 5 percent or less (percent passing the #200 sieve, based on the minus three-quarter inch fraction). In areas where slab moisture is undesirable, installation of a vapor barrier below the slab should be considered. If a vapor barrier is to be utilized, it should be a material specifically designed for use as vapor barrier and should be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Craft Architects March 18, 2011 ES-2004 Page 5 We trust this Jetter meets your current needs. If you have any questions, or if additional information is required, please call. Sincerely, EARTH SOLUTIONS NW, LLC Kyle R. Campbell, P.E. Principal Earth Solutions NW, LLC PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST; City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. PF(:FIVED INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS; This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic informatili'itli't>oi.lf~~sal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the envir.Ql¥lfllii!illt'alllrh-jl'!1cts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS; Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). -1 -06/09 Z:\_Projects\_Projects-CURRENT\Harper Engineering\(2) Parking Expansion\3-0ocuments\1-City Correspondence\SEPA\14-0325_Harper Engineering Envchlstdoc For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Harper Engineering Manufacturing Building Addition 2. Name of applicant: Craft Architects 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Craft Architects 2505 Third Avenue, Suite 324 Seattle, WA 98121 Ph (206) 720-7001 Fx (206) 720-2949 Contact: Todd Schutz 4. Date checklist prepared: 3/25/2014 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Development Services Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): SEPA Submittal March 2014 Proposed construction start June 2014 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. There are currently no plans for any building expansion beyond the current proposal. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Phase I Environmental Report by Farallon Consulting, dated July 20, 2007 Geotechnical Report by Hart Crowser, dated July 18, 2007 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. SEPA Determination of Non-significance Grading, Building, Fire, Mechanical and Electrical Permits. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. New (1) story 5,660 sq. ft. addition with 2,662 sq. ft. mezzanine to existing building. Construction type will be 111-B fire sprinkled with concrete tilt-up exterior walls and metal joist and deck roof construction. Portions of the existing site will be changed to allow the addition of 14 new parking spaces for a total of 84 stalls. The landscape area more than exceed the 25 Sq. ft. of landscaping per parking stall with the new configuration. -2 -03/14 Z :I_ P rejects\_ Projects-CU RRE NT\Harper Eng ineeri ng\(2) Parking Expansion\3-Documents \ 1 -City Correspondence\SE PA\ 14-0325 _Harper Engineering Envchlst.doc 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Street Address: 770 SW 7'" Avenue, Renton, WA 98055 Tax Parcel #182305-9270 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other ______ _ Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) The site is essentially flat c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. From the draft geotechnical report by Hart Crowser dated 7/3/07: "In general, the upper portion of the site is underlain by very soft Silt and Clay that contain variable amounts of fine sand. These soft compressible soils generally extend to a depth of about 7 to 17 feet. Beneath this highly compressible zone, we encountered loose to medium dense Sand with varying amounts of gravel. Generally, the Sand becomes medium dense at a depth of 13 to 24 feet and then dense at a depth of about 25 to 35 feet. At a depth of about 64 feet, we encountered hard, sandy Silt." d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. The original geotechnical report notes "potential liquefaction of site soils at depth due to a design seismic event". There are no surface indications of unstable soils. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There will be approximately 200 cubic feet of cut and approximately 50 cubic yards Offill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Very unlikely was the entire site around the addition is currently paved g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Asphalt and building will cover approximately 85% of the site. -3 -03/14 Z:I_Projectsl_Projects-CURRENT\Harper Engineering\{2) Parking Expansion\3-0ocuments\1-City Correspondence1SEPA\14-0325_Harper Engineering Envchlst.doc h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2. AIR For excavation and construction, a barrier fence and storm drain inlet protection will be provided to reduce run-off and sediment. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction: small quantities of vehicle emissions, construction product odors such as paint, and dust during grading. After construction: typical quantities of vehicle emissions for onsite traffic. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Quantities from automobile and truck emissions are minimal and will likely be reduced from the existing use of the site, as the total quantity of parking is being reduced. Harper Engineering's manufacturing and assembly processes do not create emissions. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. . 4. 03114 Z:\_Projects\_Projects-CURRENT\Harper Engineering\(2) Parking Expansion\3-Documents\1-C1ty Correspondence\SEPA\14-0325_Harper Engineering Envchlst.doc 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No waste water will be discharged into the ground. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. The proposed project will generate storm runoff from the existing building and parking lot as well as the new building addition. The runoff will be collected in an existing system constructed in 2001 with the initial building construction and includes storm conveyance pipe, roof downspouts and a wet detention vault. The existing storm system will remain with only minor changes made to reroute the system around the proposed building addition. Stormwater from the site will continue to be routed through the wetvault and then be discharged into an existing public storm drain system within SW J'h Street. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Raised curbing at parking areas, standard storm water control methods, and landscaping at the perimeter. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _X_ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other __ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _X_ shrubs __ grass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other -5 -03/14 z. \_Projects\_ Projects-CU RRE NT\Harper Engi neering\(2) Park 1ng Expansion\3-Documents\ 1 -City Correspondence\SE PA\ 14-0325 _ Harper Engineering Envchlst.doc __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Only minimal amount of parking area landscape islands. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None know. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Propose to match existing landscape. Proposed new trees include Red Sunset Maple and Capital Ornamental Pear. Shrubs will include Pink Abelia, Portugal Laurel and Harbor Dwarf Heavenly Bamboo. Ground cover will include Kinnikinnick, ornamental strawberry, and lawn areas. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other --"s=e=ag0 u=lls~------- Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other __________ _ Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ______ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain Unknown. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: No measures beyond the proposed new landscaping. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Natural gas for heating Electricity for lighting, general use and manufacturing purposes. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The addition will be constructed to comply with the 2012 Washington State Energy Code. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH . 6 • 03114 Z :\_Projects\_ Projects-CU RRENT\Ha rper Eng ineeri ng\(2) Parking Expansion \3-Documents \ 1-City Correspondence\SE PA\ 14-0325 _ Harper E ngineenng Envchlst.doc a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire, ambulance & police. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Signage, clearly marked parking stalls and clear traffic circulation. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Typical urban noise levels which include automobiles, trucks, trains and air traffic. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. During construction: Site excavation equipment, trucks entering and leaving site, asphalt demolition and removal; site grading, crane operation, and other basic construction noises. Post construction: trucks entering and leaving the site for deliveries, and normal traffic flow from employees and building visitors. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None at this time. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Current site is office and manufacturing use. Adjacent sites are commercial uses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Unkown. c. Describe any structures on the site. Current (2) story office and manufacturing facility for Harper Engineering of approximately 28,000 sq. ft. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Only new opening(s) cut into existing concrete wall panels where the new addition abuts the existing building. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Industrial Medium (IM) zone, within the "Employment Area -Valley" land use designation. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation ofthe site? No public hearing is required, as the proposed use is consistent with the zoning classification's permitted uses. -7 -03114 Z:I_Projectsl_Projects-CURRENT\Harper Engineering\(2) Parking Expansion\3-0ocuments\1-City Correspondence1SEPAl14-0325_Harper Engineering Envchlst.doc g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not Applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? We estimate 50 -60. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not Applicable. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project is believed to be compatible with existing and projected land use for the area. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not Applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not Applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not Applicable. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The building will be tilt-up concrete panels, with the highest wall at the primary entry at approx. 27' above grade. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? No significant glare is anticipated. The potential for glare exists from windows but would be minimal. Evening hours will have parking lot lighting for safety purposes, which will be directed on site. -8-03114 Z: \_Projects\__ Projects-CU RRENnHarper Eng ineering\(2) Parking Expansion \3-Docu ments\ 1-C ity Correspondence\S EPA\ 14-0325 _ Harper E ngi neeri ng Envchlst.doc b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? None. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not Applicable. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. All traffic will enter and exit the site from two existing curb cuts at SW 7'" Avenue. No additional curb cuts or points of access will be added. An accessible pedestrian concrete sidewalk will be linked from the public right-of-way to the building entry. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The nearest transit stop is located on Lind Ave. and is approximately 800' away. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? -9 -03/14 Z·\_Projectsl_Projects-CURRENT\Harper Engineering\(2) Parking Expansion\3-Documents\1-City Correspondence\SEPA\14-0325_Harper Engineering Envchlst.doc 84 total stalls. The project will eliminate 8 stalls. 45 of these stalls are reserved for parking by Puget Sound Electric Training Facility. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? We understand that new street improvements are planned along 7th Ave., a new trail on the north side of the street. This is a public project that will take 8' of Harper Engineering property along 7'h Ave. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. A traffic study has not been completed. Given the reduction in quantity of parking, we anticipate that vehicular trips will be reduced. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Increased need for services in not anticipated. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity, natural gas, water, sanitary sewer, telephone, recycling, and refuse services. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Natural gas Puget Sound Energy Electricity Puget Sound Energy Sanitary Sewer City of Renton Telephone lntegra Recycle Services Waste Management Refuse Services Waste Management -10 -03/14 Z:\_Projects\__ProJects-CURRENnHarper Engineering\(2) Parking Expansion\3-Documents\1-City Correspondence\SEPA\14-0325_Harper Engineering Envchlst.doc C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true, correct, and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. ---Proponent Signature: -"'~rz(.,£,::.=_..~=--"""'--1.L/ _______ _ Na me Printed: _.,_T,,_o,,,d,,,d_,,S"'c,..,h,,,ut"'z~-------------- Date: _....,3,,./~25e.1.(..=l...!.4 ___________ _ -11 -03/14 Z :\_Projects \_Projects-CU RRENT\Harper Engineering\(2) Pa rid ng Expansion\3-Docu men ts\ 1 -City Correspondence\SE PA\ 14-0325 _ Harper Engineering Envchlstdoc D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NON PROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and ro rams. You do not need to fill out these sheets for ro·ect actions. Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? -12 -03/14 Z: I_ P rojects\_P rojects-C UR R ENT\Harper Eng ineering\(2) Parking Expansion \3-Docu men ts\ 1-City Correspondence\SE PA I 14-0325 _ Harper Engineering Envchlst.doc Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true, correct, and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent Signature: ________________ _ Name Printed: Date: -13 -03/14 Z: \_Projects \_Projects-CU RRE NT'IHarper Engi neering\{2) Parking Expansion\3-Documents\ 1-City Correspondence\$ EPA I 14-0325 _ Harper Engineering Envchlst.doc • * • •: ~ :: Old Republic 1 itle, Ltd. * •• LIMITED LIABILITY REPORT Order No.: 0790004782 Unit: C Date: July 26, 2013 at 8:00 a.m. Fee: $ 250.00 Sales Tax: $ 23.75 Total: $ 273.75 FOR INFORMATION AND ASSISTANCE ON THIS ORDER CONTACT: Old Republic Title Commercial Services Christina Hughes, Title Officer chughes@ortc.com Telephone: (425) 776-4305 Fax: (425) 776-3350 19020 33rd Avenue West, Suite 360, Lynnwood Washington 98036 Reference: ATTN ADINA RUJA HARPR ENGINEERING 700 S.W. 7TH ST. RENTON WA 98057 Ladies/Gentlemen: 4yq C 7 ?'11.1 This report is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction affecting title to said Property. The liability of the Company (Old Republic National Title Insurance Company) under this Limited Liability Report shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the addressee because of reliance upon the information set forth herein, but in no event shall such liability exceed the fee paid for this Limited Liability Report. Vested in: O.J HARPER AND BESSIE MAE HARPER, husband and wife Legal Description: {fl~ SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS, SEE ATTACHED 07904782 Page 1 EXHIBIT"A" A Parcel located in the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 18, Township 23 North Range 5 East, W.M., in King county Washington, Lying South of a line 50 feet South of the centerline of the Burlington Northern Railroad Company's main line tract and lying North of the following described line: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Section 18; THENCE South 89°10'18" East along the South line of said Section 18, a distance of 275.74 feet to the Southerly projection of the West line of a parcel Deeded to George A. Hormel and Company by Deed recorded under King County Recording No. 7305240389; THENCE North 0°49'42" East along said Southerly projection 40.00 feet to the Southwest corner of said Hormel Parcel, said point being on the North margin of the Southwest Seventh Street; THENCE continuing North 0°49'42" East along the West line of said parcel 464.54 feet to a point on a 363.06 foot radius curve concave to the Southeast, a radial at said point bearing South 15°37'21" East; THENCE Easterly along said curve an arc distance of 201.19 feet to beginning of curve opposite centerline Station 1+28.2, a radial to said point bearing South 16°07'42"West 363.06 feet; THENCE 40 feet Northeasterly measured along said line radially to the beginning of said described line; THENCE Westerly and Southwesterly along a 403.06 radius curve concave to the Southeast a distance of 342 feet to a point opposite a Number 7 turnout to the right opposite centerline head block Station 4+ 70.2=0+00; THENCE continuing parallel to and 20 feet Northerly along said Number 7 turnout to a point 20 feet distance and opposite a 16' curve to the right and terminating at the Westerly line of said Section 18; EXCEPT that portion lying North of the North line of the South 650 feet of said Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 18. SITUATE in the County of King, State of Washington END OF EXHIBIT "A" 07904782 Page 2 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. RIGHTS OF PARTIES IN POSSESSION and claims that may be asserted under unrecorded instruments, if any. 2. LIABILITY FOR SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR GENERAL TAXES ON IMPROVEMENTS. It appears improvements subject to assessments are located on the premises, but there is no assessment therefore. Tax Account No. Levy Code No. 182305-9036-07 2100 3. Terms and provisions as contained in an instrument, Entitled Recorded Easement serving said Parcel December 16, 1981 in Official Records under Recording Number 8112160447 4. Matters as contained or referred to in an instrument, Entitled Recorded Record of Survey March 29, 2001 in Official Records under Recording Number 20010329900005 Which, among other things, discloses: A fence encroachment over the East boundary line. And as modified by an instrument, executed by said Parties, recorded June 15, 2001 in Official Records under Recording Number 20010615900002. Note 1: GENERAL TAXES, PLUS INTEREST AND PENALTY AFTER DELINQUENT; 1ST HALF DELINQUENT ON MAY 1; 2ND HALF DELINQUENT ON NOVEMBER 1: 07904782 Year Amount Billed Amount Paid Parcel No. Levy Code Assessed Valuation Land Improvements 2013 $7,642.33 $7,642.33 182305-9036-07 2100 $536,400.00 $0.00 Page 3 Note 2: 800 Southwest 7th Street Renton WA 98057 RMK/cm 07904782 Page 4 I **** * * ! OLD REPUBLIC TITLE & ESCROW. Ltd.I . ' ***** THIS SKETCH IS PROVIDED, WITHOUT CHARGE, FOR YOUR INFORMATION. IT IS NOT INTENDED TO SHOW ALL MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROPERTY INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, AREA, DIMENSIONS, EASEMENTS, ENCROACHMENTS OR LOCATIONS OF BOUNDARIES. IT IS NOT A PART OF, NOR DOES IT MODIFY, THE COMMITMENT OR POLICY TO WHICH IT IS ATTACHED. THE COMPANY ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY MATTER RELATED TO THIS SKETCH, UNLESS SUCH COVERAGE IS SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED BY THE COVERED RISKS OF THE POLICY. REFERENCE SHOULD BE MADE TO AN ACCURATE SURVEY FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. ~-, .. ,; SOUTHWEST QUARTER. SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST PROPERTY ADDRESS: 800 SOUTHWEST 7TH STREET. RENONTON ,WA 98057 " " 019430 ALTAMONTE C on d o lh;I 2/Jf /f · 4 Amend WO,tf/J0BOQQOQ2 " -. -JQ --,_ ' ' - . ' !;' " { 19020 33RD AVENUE WEST, STE. 360, LYNNWOOD, WA 98036, PHONE (425) 776-1970 FAX (425) 776-5710 ; • . • i > ·..::··~ -~ -.. .. -_--:· -•. -~ c...:: . :;, """ :. '.;-. ~ l.-SEMENf l(';; [_'_.~:~S'::_ Tt.< · .GT -~_/~ . . . · Toe· G_rant<:>r-, -11URLlNG.TO!t l(ORTHERN .RAlt,ROAD COMPAl'IY. "·Delaware . . corPQrat.ioni ·here1nafti::r.called.-Railway Cofkpany-.. fot· dfld in· consi!=)t!ratf~A ·of_ Teri aocl No/.100 Do liars {$10.00) to i1: paid and the ag.reenerits herein c_ontained, does her-eby grant t.o SEVENTH AVENUE ·CORPORAT~ON. a Washington corpor-ation, .hereina:fti,r ca 11 ~-d Grantee-. a:n -easemer1t for l,6~fooL grade cross_i"n'gs oV~r·;. upon and acrc.-~s the To l lowin9 described presn~'Ses s it.t1ated· ln ~ i ng County. St-at.e of ~Wash.in gt.on~ · That portion of the S:W. 1/4 of S.W. 1/4 of Secc,oo· 18, Townsh'.p 23 North, Ran9e S East, W.M •• as shown in green color on Exhibit "A" print dated 9-15-81 attached hereto and by this r£ference m~de a p~rt OereofL This easement is made subject to and upon the fol"l.owin11 ·express · conditions: I The Rail~ay Company. fcr·itself dnd its successors aod assigns. reserves all rights. to use t-he p~Oper.ty hereinbefore described for. a.ny.a.nd .all purpo_.ses iwhats'o.ever not inconsistent with the easement }1ereby 9raoted,.. inc 1 ud-:. ing. but not limited to, the right to construct, maintain,.. r~pair~ renew~ :recons·trUCt,.. r.epilace-and op~erate pres~t.tracks. ·and future tracks.,. conmuni- c~tion 90 -si·gnal and _,_el~·tric p.o .. er lines. uti1 ities. and otlJer-types _OJ faci H...; ti~s. on>said property When deemea-necessary o~ exp~dierit to the Railway.Company . Rights. reservep shall be =so __ exercised as no't tci· damage or i.nterfere With the ro~dway as abri\le defin2d. This ea.s·~ellt is_ subject to .a.l~ .. exiSting intere~ts of thi..-d parti~s. in Said. property of-·.-,.ny kind or nature whatsoe.ver and any ·and all extensions or rene~a]s thereof_ · · n All work in cmlriection with ihstalla.tion· d.nd maintainin9 Said 9r,c11d-e _cros.sing-s within the.track ar.eas shall be do~e by 5rantor•s forc·es, at the expense of the Grantee~ I II , . The Gral)tee s_ha 1'J pr-o·tect and save harmless the· Grantor from any and . all craiifl$,> d~nds,. lO:i;;,. damdge expense and liabif!-ty of ev~!"Y kincl aod de- 'scription int:Jµ:di.119 personal 'injury and for any damage to or los.s ·or destruction' of property what~oever .s~ffered by the Grantory its heirs:1-Success.ors and aSS0igAS, ·or by any pers00S~ f4r,,IS, Or corpordtiOOS, because Of t.he COOStruct.iofl and/or Dlalnte~ance of sdid facilities.· · IV The _G.r3.fttee agree·s ·to pr0vide 9 at. its -sole co~t and eX.pens.e,. adequate drainage of tti2 Railway Company's ·prOpfft.Y in connectiOn with Cons.tructiOn tlni;::1 - maintenance of sai~ grade crossings; also agrees to reimburse the Railway Company for ~ny 'and.all -e,1'tpense }.icurred by it by reason of any fai1ure of th.e Grant~e to pro1[.1de. such drainage. V In the i;:::·Jeot that ·said property sha.11 at ,3ny time cease to be us-ed by tne Grantee for gr~de crc~Sing purpo~es,. or shall bj, Ope1ati9n of law.·or-other- wise becOrAe VdC-t\.ted Ot'"" abandoned,. the easement herein. granted sl1a1l illYflediately cease and termina·te without notice or-Qt~er proceedings. on the -part of the R~ilwoy Co.JJpany 9 a;,d the Grantee., it~. ~uccess.ors or assigns; shall reconvey in,·nediatel.Y s.aid property to the Railway Campany. ;:.:1/:":.·:.-··1-S = :::..: .-.. -. ,7::-1-c,~::1::::,, (ll) sar-cprmnk02 1 2'2 I :HI >IIT1t£SS· Wi-!ER.fOF. the · puplicate thjs.. 30th day of· parties hereto .have e£ec1.1ted .1:his··a~eiement in STATE OF MINNESOTA -County of Rll)Jlsey ) ) ss. ) October ; 1')8\:. . BURLlijGTON NORTH~RN RAILROAD iOMPANY B-y~&!:/4: .· Atte;.t: ·-·;;:g.~, ·On this 30th day of ~-~--__ O_tt_o_t,;,_· _r ____ • l 3Bl. before me personal ly appeared ·N ALM INI-IC i::a--.• ,, to me known to be a. -z: •M C and ;...R;.;;•.:.Jc:.._Mo:..:.:;.r:..,;..;· nc.:..•...:·As=sc..;t:..:·c.....::S;,;:ec=r"'-e.:.ta:::l':..,Y,.__ of "BURLHIGTOII NOR1'HERN RA!LROAD COMPAltY, the coqx,rat ion that executed the within·. and foregoing i nstr(Oll(!nt. and <l;_Cknowl edged said instrun,ent.to be the free ancl voluntary act -and deed of said B-URLlNGTON NORTHEitN RAil,.ROAO roMPAN_Y. for th;.. uses. and' _purpos;es therein meot ionec:i'. 'and on-. oa~h stated thdt they were authorized to eXecute said .i.os~rt.nent and th.lt. the • seal affixed is .the corporate seal of said B-URLlllGTON NORTHERN RAILl<GAO COMPANY. 11'1 WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set_ my hand and affixed. my offi ci a 1 seal·the day and year last above ...-itten. STATE OF_ w ASHINGTON • . ea-y of King· . OAcdus . 15th. ):by-of ·ne.cember 1 19 81, befUR: rIIC", the undcn:igr>ro,. a ~ Pam& ia ~-for the Sate of Wa,biogtun, dPiy-rommissioncd ond sworn. pcnonally "PP'="" Kevin J.. Henderson Hill" · tumelc_no,vnt<,!,e~ l'~ ~x Seventh Avenue: Corpora.ti.on . the coq,oc-ation tfw: exccatcd 1he fott.goio-g i.n5tn:mx:nr. and acknowledged the gid inst(WT1C'1lt to_ be thi:: fri:c and· volunt:uy. act an4' dttd of· ~d corponcion, ffX. cbe us,cs wd purposn rhc·:u:in rn,n1tionied, lild on oat"' :.t:dcd tlut ;i.!lilhorizcd to ~ie the ~,;j in~.--un'lallt :itod that the K3l ;ii.ffi-xcd ·(if a.D}: i.:s-the: rocporatc ~ o( ~jJ <::Npe>r.ition. Wi[oa.s.· my hand 2nd officW se1l mdD .affixed the day yo ;abo1i.·c w:uen. . . ~ .... ··········,:.;;,; ;;'"'/;;;i,;;/,:"-.;n';ff~.g~:;;h;;;~;~: "-'~- ·re.1t , '"41 Renton s.arconnnk.02 2 I ' ~ I J· I ' ~ @ I t~JW~ I I l*- 1 j I '! I l I ?c / ! I I J I ,,. .., -0 -£" "' -.. "' ... ... CD .. ... ---. : .P,:. -- ... .IM,#t,W,W', ... -. ---· . ---· , ---_· . . -. ·-· , W'"91~--11J~--~·s. ,@. ~ ,.•c. -. . ,1:·.:. -, '""'- .. -·~ K'EE#4N · ,,,,,e • '-"1:1:' :t;0 .. ' ~-.<'/_,(.:.'..9-~-.. ·-·-.: . ~ • ' i ' 5~ ' ' ~ B ~ i: ,·, ' ' ~~ ~ ,, ~ • ~~ ~ a , c! ~ c, 'I < ~ ~ ' "f :: :1'~ ' ~ ~ . ~ !f ~: r ' " ' ~ ! ~ I"' " '' • il ~; ~ ~~1 0 '\ . ~ R P . r~ " a :C " c, 0 .... " C ;c ;,, ' m r r.n ::, "' " "' < m < D " "' " m "' -i ji 0 ,. -i m " m C> 0 " " m " .; ,. " " ::; 0 " .; C> m " ::! ~ 5 !: m ~-LINE S. ~c,0· sa91o·o~'E no 21''Ul'i"AU , Bl!.IS5tlf'UOII. ' iB "/iejr,IJ ';;!;lQOl"; lJ!Ji>ll r~r,;_ raca, <o:cno,, c""'ui 10 ,;,. CCll•(l ~ ~~~1~ !;Pij~ § i~l!i ~ p~ .. o ···~ § ,1. O:i:,i2 ~~ " • se:: I ~ :;F ... ,!;',;8!; ·r· ' ~ ~; • ~::l:i.2 e a~;~ ~ "'g,..;;:1 ! ~"'~~ ! a•o 0 ' i~i!i ~;~~ !~i~ ~,:;lj -~~ -~~ ... ,-,-,~- ~ n~"Jlo•D!O (i155'llll.9!':0 , o.c,r or ;i:c~" L''< ., i " "' a-,, ,, g. :a': "' ,A on g, (_~ a :: [2 t i.; -------------- JlS;\;'e:il ., ' ~~ z il»"" "' a r~;;,,, ~, ! 0 cc~»-<;!< ~~ iii ~:~:s .. ,, !" ,, ~~;;::"'.,s :i ;~ s ;;ojE~t s ,, ~ ~ !" ll3i ;s ~ ..;>: ··~· ~~,,~ ~t:l !:!: ~ • g~ -~ .t § fi§g~ ,, ~:;:~ gieo'II i; ~ ~~I~ • • ! ,~;2 ~F '.'.l:'.l:'.i ! " i ' . " ~~ ~tg " " s • a.,~z ~~ £>g Q "'l.:J-" ~0 2i'i g~ ;:: ::! s ~cl,.~ "'1:F.., t\',! Ui I !ii~ ~· , .. •, ~ ~ • ,, i'lr!,1 ~' '"""' ~ ~ i ___ _Jt:*---- r..:,("IC)P0!'1h,_5.'aJ cw: IIOll ll/11l/~ • "' m B () > 0 "' " r m "' ,.. r " m "' () " ;; -i i5 z • ,.,, C: :D < m -< 0 :D "' ~ ! i~i w i '"' ~ l~ j 1 •. '1~ ,o J tg i~ ~ J~· <> i[ . ' ,. i! '< ·> . ' -~ . ' i ~ ;~ . ' 'm :g ·~ ,a 1p " ·~ t .. ~ ~ oo; ;· § -'1 fi :P 2 ,.Ill en is •1 og, ~ S''j ""' a ~ !) ' ~ i ~ <ll :1 ;l "1 i ~ ~ ~ i:.,;;"' 0 , "'::: s :D m " E o :c () 0; ~ "' 0 ' :D 0;;; ... !TI 0 '5 ;~~ :,-b 0 D ,; g "° :D "Tl ~,,; z "' 0 .• :-< ' C e c :-< :D ., < z m ol -< a o, -. 0 "' 0, , 0 ' • ;:; ~ • 1000· ·++·ri..--------"ss,""'"'"s"'o''--''C"c-'e'-------~ m. 2.r !IF•c:: ai~, c,? "°'' 131 IS"m/00 O.T ___ .,,.~ o.~· ! , a I • ' ' ; • : " ~ ' !!ii: 11~~~~ ~'i'"';:\-o ~:!;i ~ujl!: •. ~ § •• .:;~~ .. ~ ,i~! ~gm'i~ ~;Hi ~~;2 ;3~~ *"',..Q -~~~ o~p" ~~oF i'ir.:"'§ ~~·· !!l:3g"!l ~:,:~/ii ,tj! --<1.[:i:':; ~~!I~ f;~~ ~-j!lc i!:~1<~ c:inci!i 8~~~ 8~!.'!z o:i;~,! ~·t .. ' ~~~: ~;~~ :zO:,,.~ ~!; i '"m! ;~~~ h~~ ;t~ R f;{~;;: nr~ '" ! -~:z: ~,: ' ' • ~2~ ti i'!li! ~~l: ;;t:il" ?H ~ ·~ ~ ·: .!!. _:: ., :~~ ~~ ., oc 'E' " '" ·r "' ~-E ,< ~t ~~~ i~ ::ljGl[:l _!l:!£ "!"" Bi ~,j~ !il8i ", ~~ ~§~ ,, ' 2! 'i2 'i!.~ ~~ : ' 0 • i i • 0 , • 0 ; i I~ w ~ m 0 0 ~ 0 ~ > r " ~ :D 'ii -< 0 z RECEIPT EG00021542 BILLING CONTACT Todd Schutz Craft Architects 2505 THIRD AVE , SUITE 324 SEATILE, WA 98121 REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME LUA 14-000454 PLAN -Environmental Review PLAN • Site Plan Review -Admin Technology Fee Printed On: 41712014 Prepared By: Angelea Wickstrom TRANSACTION TYPE Fee Payment Fee Payment Fee Payment Transaction Date: April 07, 2014 PAYMENT METHOD Check #006635 Check #006635 Check #006635 SUB TOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT PAID $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $60.00 $2,060.00 $2,060.00 Page 1 of1