Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA-08-126 -Report 1CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: January 22, 2009 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: LUA (file) Number: Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Acceptance Date: Applicant: Owner: Contact: PIO Number: ERC Decision Date: ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Denial: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date Appealed to Council; By Whom: Council Decision: Mylar Recording Number: Liberty Grove Plat LUA-08-126 King County Files #L03P0006; L03TY403; & L03P0005 King County: Karen Scharer May 15, 2003 Wayne Jones, Lakeridge Development Platt Family Revocable Living Trust, Guy Plazt, Thelma Bowen same as applicant 3664500141 December 16, 2003 January 9, 2004 February 10, 2004 24-lot approved subject to conditions. Rezone denied. March 19, 2004 Gwendolyn High, C.A.R.E. Appeal denied Date: February 23, 2004 Date: May 10, 2004 Project Description: Applicant requests rezone from R-4 to R-6 and subdivision of the the site • into 24 lots for detached single-family residences and tracts for sensitive areas, recreation and , drainage facilities. The applicant proposes to use 5 density credit transfers to plat the 24-lots if the · rezone is denied, Location: N of SE 136'" Street between 158'" Avenue SE & 160'" Avenue SE Comments: 1/28/04 -Applicant withdrew request for rezone. ------------------·----------.. -.. -... ~·-··,, .. ,,.,,,, Land Use Application Information APPLICANT: Wayne Jones, Lakeridge Development FILE No.: LUA-08-126 -----'----------- PROJECT NAME: Liberty Grove Plat -----'------------ PROPERTY LOCATION: N of SE 136th Street between 158th Avenue SE & 160'h Avenue SE PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 10, 2004 ·----'-----'~------- HEARING EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION: 24-lot approved ·--------'-'----- subject to conditions. Rezone denied. REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION: Date Received: ·----------------- Response:. ___________________ _ APPEAL: Date Received: ·-----Date Response:. ____ _ CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: Date of Approval: May 10, 2004 Ordinance/Resolution No.: King County Ord. 14901 Date of Ordinance/Resolution:._c_M_a:.!._y_:.1:..:0:..c,__:2:..:0:..:0_:.4_:._ _____ _ MYLAR TO COUNTY FOR RECORDING: Date:. ____________________ _ Mylar Recording: _________________ _ CROSS REFERENCES: King County Files #L03P0006; L03TY403; & L03P0005 OTHER REMARKS: 1/28/04 -Applicant withdrew request for rezone. TYPES 3 and 4 LOG SHEET (Format Plat, Rezone, Special Use, Shoreline Redesignation) FILE NUMBER: L03P0006 PLATIPROJECT 1\JAME: LIBERTY GROVE HEARI1\JG DA TE(S): ~o?~-~/;~/_<'.'..J~/;~d~-1~- CONTINUANCE HEARING DATE(S), __ ~-- PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO.: #-,...Jj!J~~ci:J~ PLAl\l\ER: Kim Claussen L'JCill\EER: Bruce Whittaker COMPLETE APPLICATION (date): _1 ___ _ APPEAL FILED: D NO J:rS.¥.;,s date: _____ _ ORDINANCE No.!M EFFECTIVE DATE: .~A I µIf HEARING DATE(S) __________ jJ----r--l.b...-----p-----..~--l-P--:-c#r,~- 1. D PREHEARl1\JG CONF. l\OTlCE 2. il{-HEARING NOTICE 3 D PREIIEARI1\JG ORDER 4 D CONTINUATION 5. ~PORT 6 D RECONSIDERATION 7. D APPEAL SUMMARY C,)mEs STAFF AcnoNs I. D CONTINUATIONNOTICE 2. )l-REPORT date(s): ____ _ date(s): / /Wj( date(s): ____ _ date(s): -~---;-+- date(s): ,A/,R 3/t? t/ date(s): _____ _ date(s): ____ _ date mailed: ---~-- date mailed: ;/,;zz/, f ' 1. D ADDENDUM REPORT date mailed: ---------: /_ ./. 4. /)llTRANSMITTAL TO EXAMINER (POR's/DOCS/STUDIES) date sent: /'1t}( ~ ~cf ;f 5. )Q.PROPOSED ORDINANCE NUMBER EMAIL TO THE KC CLERKS OFFICE date sen::~7 /£3 GSEPA REOUIREME"ITS I. THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: ,IYJO,I\ /_!:; DATE ISSUED: /c2J((} ;ff, ) 2. SEA TT)-FTIMES PUB LI CA TI~ATE: / DATE AFFIDA y.FfREC'D: / 3. D~POSTEDPERAFF~IT: _ z DATEAFF~ITREC'D,/ ___ _ 4. DATE 500' RADIUS/AGENCIES/PORS/STAFF SENT: -~.l<~c:e"'-+-0:~4'.?~4,.,_,....-f~--------- 5. APPEAL FILED: DYES ONO a, APPELLANTS: --------------date received: -------- date received: _______ _ date received: _______ _ b. APPEAL ARGUMENTS: -----------date received: _______ _ date received: _______ _ date received: _______ _ TYPES 3 A\JD 4 LOG SHEET page 2 of3 E. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENT L03P0006 QonCE OF APPLICATION a) AFF!DA VIT OF POSTING/POSTING PACKAGE SENT tJ ,,3t,')!),3 REC'D d/p ,h 1 b) LEGAL AD SEATTLE TIMES date(s) sent: 6/;i-;b_5 date publtshed: 5/.;IL)/22j LOCALS date(s) sent: o/J!:;/tJ. -3 date published: t;) /2/Jd:J.3 c) soo· RAD!USiAGENCIES/POR's/STAFF date(s) sent: <.~/d'l/a,3 hJ NOTICE OF RECOMMENDATION/PUBLIC HEARING V a) LEGAL AD SEA TILE TIMES date(s) sent: / /~ ,,1:J tf"' date published: -'-'-,--~- LOCALS date(s) sent: / /@,y' date published: --<"-".,£.J.""-,'---- b) 500' RADIUS/AGENCIES/PO~FF /)-"/ :f:;;ff ,1;;, )}, 3 @ APPLICATION Date received: March 11, 2003 L O INTAKE CHECKLIST 2. D APPLICATION FEE 3. ~PLICANT DESIGNATION FORM /il!._ LEGAL DESCRJPTION 4. ~ASSESSOR'S MAPS .S:€ 11-iil3 -5 · NG ) 5. 6. ~CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY ' ,. iJ.. CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITY 8. 0 PRELIMINARY HEALTH APPROVAL 9. D CERTIFICATE OF FUTURE CONNECTION I 0. jl!LFIRE DISTRICT RECEIPT I I . ~!TE PLAN/PLAT MAP 12. ~EGAL LOT PROOF I 7;TLI:;; KE.PO ;a-/ lJ/IRR/jA)TY ;JEc2) 13. ,:a--sENSITIVE AREA AFFIDAVIT 14. ~VIRONMENTALCHECKLIST/~£if/5e,£J '1'/3/,1._3 15. od"TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY 16. j;l' LEVEL ONE DRAINAGE ANALYSIS/ x°a/J.£;"".<'.) q / '3 /tJ 3 17 ~THER iVtL IJFJu,VlY (!IJCL!,5/Jrf.1f/{)e7) q/3)03 1s. !:l'"WAIVER(sJ FEE 1!.)/11!1& ~ADDITIONAL PLANS/MAPS I. CO\JCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN DATES RECEIVED: '?-/,l-c:23 2. WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN Q REVISION NO. 1 4. REVISION NO. 2 5. REVISION NO. 3 6. REVISION NO. 4 @THERM~PS al 7 P?' 3-/1-cJ 3 c), _________________ _ d) _________________ _ e) _________________ _ !) _________________ _ TYPES 3 AND 4 LDG SHEET p..ig..: 3 of 3 (v sPECIAL STUDIES 0 WETLAl\DiSTREAM REPORT 2. GEOTECIINICAL REPORT G TRAFFIC STUDY L03P0006 DA TES RECEIVED /Jll£,¢m/NdTLMIEJ//IU/,f)-7l,t?,,U L.iJct../AlaJ-77().AJ ____ _,_. ___ W//1'1~ . ,.3-//~~ 3 .i-11-tJJ I '1-3-a? 4. WILDLIFE STUDY 0 OTHER(documcnttitle) '~ u!AIJLIN,6 /@uTE,/J/lll}t.,Y..5/S ez/;A 3 I. GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE 1. 2. 3. 4. t/-903 Rkd#£scztM: :5;""Ht:Jc ?1/RJ~t! C7mnf'1.t.Tco s. 5;-Mr~3 n/J..£ ~Ebif> /Jt/@iJ/J!-~A.IOL'.'.PM 5 <f>-3-0,3 /(8.QkB5T /1/.),4/P?M'dl JAJ"l0~ L-71'!., 6. 8. 9. 10. //-dl,-fzf 3 to/AW'r-t'. 7leAtusB.JZ -Mn::? :~ fj{~43 f~~Al~ 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. --------------------------- 26. --------------------------- 27. --------------------------- 28. --------------------------- 29. --------------------------- 30. --------------------------- 31. --------------------------- 32. --------------------------- 33. --------------------------- 34. --------------------------- 35. --------------------------- Rogers, Carol From: Sent: To: Subject: Scharer, Karen Wednesday, January 28, 2004 2:05 PM Ohrmundt, Ginger; Rogers, Carol; O'Connor, Jim FW: Liberty and Liberty Gontigious Rezone I will present the following e-mail at the hearing on Feb. 10th. -----Original Message----- From: wayne jones [mailto:joneswayne@qwest.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 12:25 PM To: Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV Subject: Liberty and Liberty Contigious Rezone Lakeridge development is withdrawing our request for the rezone on Liberty Grove (L03TY403 & L03P0006) and Liberty Grove Contigious (L03TY401 & L03POOOS). Wayne Jones 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 '• Proposed No. 2004-0006.1 KING COUNTY Signature Report May 10, 2004 Ordinance 14901 Sponsors Phillips 1,. _ r.ing County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seatlle, WA 98104 AN ORDINANCE authorizing a subdivision on certain property located north of SE 136th Street and between 158th Ave SE and 160th Ave SE, at the request of Wayne Jones, Lakeridge Development, department of development and environmental services file no. L03P0006. 8 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 9 SECTION 1. This ordinance does hereby adopt and incorporate the findings and 10 conclusions contained in the February 23, 2004, report and decision by the hearing 11 examiner and adopts as the decision of the council the decision by the hearing examiner 12 to approve the transfer of five density credits and to grant the application for preliminary 13 approval, subject to the conditions recommended by the examiner, of the proposed 14 twenty-four-lot plat of Liberty Grove, received September 3, 2003, in department of 15 development and environmental services file no. L03P0006. l MAIN FILE COPY Ordinance 14901 16 SECTION 2. The appeal of the February 23, 2004, decision of the hearing 17 examiner by Citizens for a Responsible Evendell ("C.A.R.E. ") is denied. 18 Ordinance 14901 was introduced on 1/12/2004 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 5/10/2004, by the following vote: ATIEST: Yes: 10 -Mr. Phillips, Ms. Edmonds, Ms. Lambert, Mr. Pelz, Mr. McKenna, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Hammond, Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague and Mr. Constantine No:O Excused: 3 -Mr. von Reichbauer, Mr. Irons and Ms. Patterson KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING CO Y, WASHING Anne Noris. Clerk of the Council Attachments None 2 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 400 Y esler Way, Room 404 Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 296-4660 Facsimile {206) 296-1654 February 23, 2004 REPORT AND DECISION SUBJECT: Department of Development and Environmental Services File Nos. L03P0006/L03TY 403 Proposed Ordinance Nos. 2004-0004; 2004-0006 LIBERTY GROVE Proposed Preliminary Plat and Proposal for Transfer of Density Credits Location: Applicant: North of Southeast 136th Street, between 160'h Avenue Southeast and 158th Avenue Southeast Lakeridge Development Attn: Wayne Jones P.O. Box 146 Renton, Washington 98057 Telephone: (425) 228-9750 Intervenor: C.A.R.E., represented by Gwendolyn High 13405 -1581h A venue Southeast Renton, Washington 98059 King County: Department of Development and Environmental Services, represented by Karen Scharer 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Telephone: (206) 296-7114 Facsimile: (206) 296-6613 SUMMARY OF DECISION/RECOMMENDATION: Department's Preliminary Recommendation: Department's Final Recommendation: Examiner's Decision: Approve, subject to conditions Approve, subject to conditions (modified) Approve, subject to conditions (modified) L03P0006/L03TY403~Liberty Grove EXAMINER PROCEEDINGS: Hearing opened: Hearing closed: 2 February 10, 2004 February 10, 2004 Participants at the public hearing and the exhibits offered and entered are listed in the attached minutes. A verbatim recording of the hearing is available in the office of the King County Hearing Examiner. ISSUESffOPICS ADDRESSED • Transfer of density credits • Surface water drainage • Road improvements • Safe walking conditions SUMMARY Application for transfer of a maximum of 5 density credits, and approval of a preliminary plat to subdivide approximately 4.84 acres into 24 lots in the urban area, a~e granted preliminary approval. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: I. General Information: Proponent: Representative: Intervenor: Wayne Jones, Jr. Lakeridge Development Inc. PO Box 146 Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-228-9750 e-mail: joneswayne@qwest.net Mel L. Daley, P.E. Daley-Morrow-Poblete, Inc. Auburn Way North Phone: 253-333-2200 Facsimile: 253-333-2206 C.A.R.E., represented by Gwendolyn High 13405 -158lh Avenue Southeast Renton, Washington 98059 Location: Lying south of SE 136'h St. between 160lh Ave. SE and 162lh Ave. SE. Sectionffownship/Range: SE 14-23-05 Parcel# 3664500141 Acreage Plat: 4.84 acres L03P0006/L03TY403~LibcrtyGrove Current Zoning: R-4 Number of Lots: Proposed -24 w/5 TOR Density: 5.2 dwellings per acre Lot Size: generally 6,000 square feet Proposed Use: single family Sewage Disposal: City of Renton Water Supply: Water District #90 Fire District: King County Fire District # 25 School District: Issaquah Community Plan: Newcastle Drainage Subbasin: Lower Cedar River King County Permits: Rezone and Subdivision Complete Application Date: May 15, 2003 (Date Plat Filed March 11, 2003 & Rezone May 7, 2004) Threshold Determination: Mitigated Determination ofNonsignificance (MONS) Date of Issuance: December 16, 2003 KC Permit Contact: Karen Scharer, Project Manager II, Current Planning Section, LUSD Phone # 296-7114 or e-mail at kan;n.scharer@metrokc.gov 3 2. Except as modified herein, the facts set forth in the ODES preliminary report to the Hearing Examiner for the February I 0, 2004, public hearing are found to be correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. Said report is exhibit no. 4 in the hearing record. 3. The Applicant's request to reclassify the subject property from R4 to R6 was withdrawn prior to commencement of the hearing. 4. On February 4, 2004 the King County Hearing Examiner issued his report and decision granting preliminary approval for the revised plat of Evendell, based upon transfer of 20 density credits that would allow for development of70 lots on 12.43 acres. This would provide a density of5.6 dwelling units per acre on the Evendell property, which is directly south, across Southeast 136th Street, from the subject.property. The Examiner's decision approving the Evendell plat revision, File No. LOIP0016, is exhibit no. 33 in the hearing record of this proceeding. 5. Directly east, north and west of the subject property are suburban-sized lots, ranging from approximately 9,000 to 30,000 square feet in area. The maximum pennitted density in the R4 zone classification is 6 dwelling units per acre, utilizing density incentives or transferred development rights. 6. King County's "Transfer of Development Rights (TOR)" program is governed by Chapter 21A.37 of the King County Code. The TOR program establishes a property right which is separable from the fee-simple title to certain lands within King County, and provides a method for the transfer and utilization of that new right, which is colloquially known as a development right or "density credit." A density credit has a substantial market value. The underlying purpose of the TOR program is to allow for the movement of residential density from rural areas to urban areas of King County. The code is intended to provide," ... an efficient and streamlined administrative review system to ensure that transfers of development rights to L03P0006/L03TY403-Liberty Grove 4 receiving sites are evaluated in a timely way and balanced with other County goals and policies, and are adjusted to the specific conditions of each receiving site." KCC 2 lA.37.010.2. Receiving sites are required to meet the provisions ofKCC 21A.37.030. Those requirements are that the receiving site: I. be within an unincorporated urban area, zoned R-4 or higher, or be within a potential annexation area; 2. be within a city where new growth is or will be encouraged, and where facilities and services exist or public investments in facilities and services will be made; or 3. be within RA-2.5 and RA-5 zoned parcels, subject to stringent criteria. The subject property is within the first category of eligible receiving sites listed in KCC 21A.37.030. Sites within the unincorporated urban growth area are not required to have any specific level of available facilities and services. Development approvals that utilize density credits must meet only those service criteria that apply generally to development of the number of dwelling units proposed on the site. King County Code chapter 2 IA.12 governs densities and drvelopment standards in residential zones. The R-4 zone in the urban residential area allows for a maximum density of six dwelling units per acre, which may be achieved only through the application ofresidential density incentives or transfers of development rights. KCC 21 A.12.030.A. and B. I. When density credits are used, development shall comply with dimensional standards of the zone having a base density most comparable to the total approved density. KCC 21A.37.030.B. 7. The foregoing provisions of the King County Zoning Code are generally consistent with policies of the King County Comprehensive Plan governing residential land use. In particular, the Zoning Code provisions are generally consistent with: Policy U-113, that new residential development in the Urban Growth Area should occur where facilities and services can be provided at the lowest public cost and in a timely fashion; Policy U-114, that the County seek to achieve an average zoning density ofat least seven to eight homes per acre in the Urban Growth Area through a mix of densities, allowing for lower density zones to recognize existing subdivisions with little or no opportunity for infill or redevelopment; Policy U-122 that supports increases in urban density through a rezone or a proposal to utilize density transfer, when the proposal will help resolve traffic, utility, parks or open space deficiencies in the immediate neighborhood. This proposal will improve traffic circulation in the area, will extend sewer service further into the urban area, and will provide recreation facilities and open space available to future residents on the subject property. 8. The subject property is in the City ofRenton's potential annexation area. The City is considering modifications to its comprehensive plan that would limit density on this property to a maximum L03P0006/L03TY 403-Liberty Grove of 4 dwelling units per acre. However, those plan changes were not in effect at the time a complete application for this subdivision was submitted. 5 9. ODES and the Applicant have agreed upon right-of-way dedications and road improvements to mitigate the impact of traffic which this proposal will generate adjacent to and in the immediate vicinity of the proposed development. The dedications and improvements include additional right-of-way and construction that will open and improve the north side of Southeast 136th Street, from 160th Avenue Southeast to 158th Avenue Southeast. This dedication and improvement will be matched on the south side of 136th Street by dedication and improvements to be constructed by the plat ofEvendell. Additional improvements that will be made to Southeast 136th Street from 158th Avenue Southeast to 156th Avenue Southeast will result in a new east-west route from 160th Avenue Southeast to 156th Avenue Southeast. This new route will divert traffic from the high accident intersection of Southeast I 28th Street and 160th Avenue Southeast. The subject plat will also provide improvements to the west side of 160th A venue Southeast along the plat frontage, to the urban neighborhood collector standard. These improvements will include a sidewalk from the north property line to Southeast 136th Street. I 0. The Issaquah School District plans to operate a school bus stop for elementary school children at the intersection of Southeast 136th Street and 160th Avenue Southeast. The internal road improvements and frontage improvements on 160th Avenue Southeast will provide a safe route for children to use between the lots of this subdivision and that bus stop. 11. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. a. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual and applicable updates adopted by King County. DOES approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. b. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by ODES Engineering Review, shall be shown on the engineering plans. c. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: "All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storrn drain outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings# on file with ODES and/or the King County Department of Transportation. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building perrnit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots that are designated for individual lot infiltration systems, the systems shall be constructed at the time of the building perrnit and shall comply with plans on file." L03P0006/L03TY 403-Liberty Grove d. The stormwater detention design shall comply with the Level 2 or Level 3 Flow Control requirements, as applicable, per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). (See SEPA conditions in condition no. 19.) e. The storm water control facility shall be located in a separate tract and dedicated to King County unless portions of the drainage tract are used for required recreation space in accordance with KCC 21 A.14.180. 6 12. A surface water drainage adjustment (no. L03V0065) has been approved for this proposal and the Liberty Grove Contiguous proposal (no. L03P0005). Stormwater detention for the subject property will be provided on the Liberty Grove Contiguous property site that lies on the south side of Southeast 136th Street and east side of 160th Avenue Southeast. The level 3 flow control standard is required as a condition of the drainage adjustment for discharge from the surface water detention facilities. In addition, some downstream surface water conveyance improvements have been made by King County, and others are required to be made by this and other developments that are being proposed and constructed in this area. The downstream analysis and required improvements assure adequate conveyance of surface water for a distance greater than Y. mile from this plat. The,Jevel 3 flow control standard protects downstream properties from damage from surface water discharge from this development. CONCLUSIONS: I. If approved subject to the conditions recommended below, the proposed subdivision will comply with the goals and objectives of the King County Comprehensive Plan, subdivision and zoning codes, and other official land use controls and policies of King County. 2. If approved subject to the conditions recommended below, this proposed subdivision will make appropriate provision for the public health, safety and general welfare and for open spaces for drainage ways, streets, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supply, sanitary waste, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds and safe walking conditions for students who only walk to school; and it will serve the public use and interest. 3. The conditions for final plat approval recommended below are in the public interest and are reasonable requirements to mitigate the impacts of the development upon the environment. 4. The dedications of land or easements within and adjacent to the proposed plat, as required for final plat approval or as shown on the proposed preliminary plat submitted by the Applicant on September 3, 2003, are reasonable and necessary as a direct result of the development of this proposed plat, and are proportionate to the impacts of the development. 5. The Applicant has negotiated for the purchase of development rights that would allow for an increase in the number oflots to be developed on the subject property to a total of 24. The development of24 lots on the subject property will be within the maximum density of 6 dwelling units per acre permitted in the R4 zone classification in the urban area, although it will be most comparable to the base density of the R6 zone classification. The proposed development of the subject property, utilizing up to 5 density rights, is consistent with all applicable development standards and other provisions of the king county code. Provisions of the City of Renton L03P0006/L03TI403~Liberty Grove Comprehensive Plan concerning density of development on this property are not applicable to this proposal. 7 6. The road improvements proposed and agreed to by the Applicant, including those shown on the September 3, 2003 preliminary plat and set forth in the conditions below, will reasonably mitigate the impacts of traffic generated by the proposed development. 7. Safe walking conditions for children who walk to school from the subject property will be provided by using one of the alternatives for improvements incorporated into this proposal and set forth in condition no. 22 below. 8. The conditions of approval of the surface water drainage adjustment L03V0065, and the conditions reconunended by ODES and agreed to by the Applicant, incorporated into the conditions below, mitigate the impacts of surface water drainage from this proposed development. DECISION: The proposed preliminary plat of Liberty Grove, as revised and received September 3, 2003, utilizing up to 5 density credits (transferable density rights}, is APPROVED, subject to the following conditions of final plat approval: I. a. Compliance with all platting provisions of Title 19 of the King County Code. b. Prior to the recording of Liberty Grove, the plat of Liberty Grove Contiguous shall be recorded (as drainage facilities for Liberty Grove will be constructed off-site in the plat of Liberty Grove Contiguous). 2. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final plat a dedication which includes the language set forth in King County Council Motion No. 5952. 3. a. The plat shall comply with the maximum density (and minimum density) requirements of the R-4 zone classification. All lots shall meet the minimum dimensional requirements of the R-6 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary plat, whichever is larger, except that minor revisions to the plat which do not result in substantial changes may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services. b. The Applicant shall provide Transfer of Density Credit documentation to ODES prior to final approval to allow transfer of a maximum of five density credits. 4. The applicant must obtain final approval from the King County Health Department for abandonment of existing septic systems on-site serving on and off-site homes. 5. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the King County Road Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No. 11187, as amended (1993 KCRS). 'II L03P0006/L03TY403-Liberty Grove 6. The applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main, and fire flow standards of Chapter 17.08 of the King County Code. 8 7. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location oflots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9 .04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. a. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual and applicable updates adopted by King County. DOES approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. b. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by DOES Engineering Review, shall be shown on the engineering plans. c. The following note shall be shown on the final recqrded plat: All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings # on file with DDES and/or the King County Department of Transportation. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots that are designated for individual lot infiltration systems, the systems shall be constructed at the time of the building permit and shall comply with plans on file." d. The storm water control facility shall be located in a separate tract and dedicated to King County unless portions of the drainage tract are used for required recreation space in accordance with KCC 2JA.14.180. 8. A drainage adjustment (L03V0065) is approved for this site and for the Liberty Grove Contiguous site (L03P0005). The adjustment allows combining the storm water from both subdivisions on the Liberty Grove Contiguous site; and routing post developed flows to 1601h Ave SE. A flow splitter is proposed to maintain existing flows to the south. All conditions of approval for this adjustment shall be met prior to engineering plan approval. A Conceptual Drainage Plan showing the preliminary configuration was received March 11, 2003. 9. The stormwater detention facility shall be designed to the Level 3 flow control standard in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual(KCSWDM). The facility shall also be designed to meet the basic water quality menu. I 0. The downstream drainage system along the east side of 1601h Ave SE from the south plat boundary of Liberty Grove Contiguous to approximately 50 feet south of the culvert 29 (House # 14028); shall be improved to achieve adequate drainage capacity per the 1998 KCSWDM. Culvert 29 is approximately 900 feet south of the southwest comer of the LCG site and is shown L03P0006/L03TY 403-Liberty Grove in the Level 1 Offsite Analysis received September 3, 2003. Plans and supporting capacity analysis for this improvement shall be submitted with the engineering plans. 11. The 100-year floodplain for any on-site wetlands or streams shall be shown on the engineering plans and the final plat per Special Requirement #2 of the KCSWDM. 12. The following road improvements are required to be constructed according to the 1993 King County Road Standards(KCRS): a. SE 135th PL shall be improved to the urban subaccess street standard. b. FRONTAGE: The frontage along 1601 • Ave SE shall be improved to the urban neighborhood collector standard(west side only). 9 c. FRONT AGE: The frontage along SE 136th ST may be improved to the urban standards per the SEPA mitigation list. d. Tract A shall be improved as a private access tract according to Section 2.09 of the KCRS. The tract shall be owned and maintained by the owners of those Lots being served. Tracts C and D shall each be improved as a joint use driveway per Section 3.01 of the KCRS. The tracts shall be owned and maintained by the owners of those Lots being served. e. A R/W radius shall be dedicated at the northeast quadrant of 1581• Ave SE and SE 136th St. (southwest corner of Lot 16), and a second radius shall be dedicated at the northwest quadrant of 160'h Ave SE and SE 136'h St. (southeast corner of Lot 24). f. Modifications to the above road conditions may be considered according to the variance provisions in Section 1.08 of the KCRS. 13. All utilities within proposed rights-of-way must be included within a franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final plat recording. 14. The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by the applicable fee ordinance. The applicant has the option to either: (1) pay the MPS fee at final plat recording, or (2) pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the plat that reads, "All fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), have been paid." If the second option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of building permit application. 15. The proposed subdivision shall comply with the Sensitive Areas Code as outlined in KCC 2IA.24. Preliminary plat review has identified the following specific requirements that apply to this project. All other applicable requirements from KCC 2 IA.24 shall also be addressed by the applicant: L03P0006/L03TY403-Liberty Grove 10 Southeast 1361h Street to the south of the project site may or may not be improved prior to beginning construction on Liberty Grove. If road improvements are made or are in the process of being constructed, then no wetland conditions shall apply. If however the improvements are not made or are not under construction, then the extent of the buffer/wetland area shall be shown ou the Plat of Liberty Grove and a Sensitive Areas Tract is required for the protection of the Class II buffer/wetland area for the wetland identified on the Plat ofEvendell. 16. The following note shall be shown on the final engineering plan and recorded plat, if wetland buffer is necessary per condition 15 above: RESTRICTIONS FOR SENSITIVE AREA TRACTS AND SENSITIVE AREAS AND BUFFERS Dedication of a sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the tract/sensitive area and buffer. This interest includes the preservation of native vegetation for all purposes that benefit the public health, safety and welfare, including control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the Jani! subject to the tract/sensitive area and buffer the obligation, enforceable on behalf of the public by King County, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the tract/sensitive area and buffer. The vegetation within the tract/sensitive area and buffer may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged without approval in writing from the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services or its successor agency, unless otherwise provided by law. The common boundary between the tract/sensitive area and buffer and the area of development activity must be marked or otherwise flagged to the satisfaction of King County prior to any clearing, grading, building construction or other development activity on a lot subject to the sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer. The required marking or flagging shall remain in place until all development proposal activities in the vicinity of the sensitive area are completed. No building foundations are allowed beyond the required 15-foot building setback line, unless otherwise provided by law. 17. Suitable recreation space shall be provided consistent with the requirements KCC 21A.14.180 and KCC 21A.14.190 in providing sport court[s], children's play equipment, picnic table[s], benches, etc. a. A detailed recreation space plan (i.e., landscape specs, equipment specs, etc.) shall be submitted for review and approval by DOES and King County Parks prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the engineering plans. This plan shall comply with Ordinance# 14045. b. A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording of the plat. L03P0006/L03TY403-Libcrty Grove 11 18. A homeowners' association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction ofDDES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the recreation, open space and/or sensitive area tract(s). 19. Street trees shall be included in the design of all road improvements, and shall comply with Section 5.03 of the KCRS and KCC 2IA.16.050: a. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. b. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. c. If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. d. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the County has adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. e. The species of trees shall be approved by DOES iflocated within the right-of-way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. f. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by DOES prior to engineering plan approval. g. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DOES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. A landscape inspection fee shall also be submitted prior to plat recording. The inspection fee is subject to change based on current County fees. 20. The following have been established by SEPA as necessary requirements to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of this development. The applicants shall demonstrate compliance with these items prior to final approval. L03P0006/L03TY403-Liberty Grove Individually, or joint with other area developers, the Applicant shall design and construct improvements to Southeast I 28th Street at l 60'h Ave. SE to mitigate project impacts at the High Accident Location. Or, the Applicant shall reduce the project impacts at the High Accident Location by completing the remainder of the improvements to Southeast 136th Street (i.e. additional paving, concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks), between 158th Avenue SE and 160th Avenue SE, and, revise the channelization at the intersection of 156th Avenue SE/SE 136th Street to provide a southbound left turn lane. School Mitigation Fees 12 21. Lots within this subdivision are subject to King County Code 21A.43, which imposes impact fees to fund school system improvements needed to serve new development As a condition of final approval, fifty percent (50%) of the impact fees due for the plat shall be assessed and collected immediately prior to recording, using the fee schedules in effect when the plat receives final approval. The balance of the assessed fee shall be allocated evenly to the dwelling units in the plat and shall be collected prior to building permit issuance. School Walkways 22. The Applicant, individually or in conjunction with other developers, shall construct an off-site walkway to Liberty High school from the site. The walkway shall be constructed within the right-of-way from 160th Ave SE, east along SE 135th Street to 166th Ave SE, and south to Liberty High School at SE 136th Street, or via alternative right-of-way and easements that become available and are approved by DDES. One acceptable alternative would be to use future right-of-way of Southeast 136th Street and 162nd Avenue Southeast to connect with the sidewalk improvement of"five lot subdivision," and through the plat of"five lot subdivision"/LOOP0023 to the southwest gate of Liberty High School. The walkway shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the 1993 King County Road Standards and shown on the engineering plans for DDES review and approval. Any surfacing alternative from the King County Road Standards (KCRS 3.09) may be submitted for approval through a road variance application. ORDERED this 23rd day of February, 2004. TRANSMITTED this 23rd day of February, 2 , o the parties and interested persons of record: Wimam J. Bowen Bowen Revocable Living Trust 13644 -160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Wilma J. Bowen 13644 • 160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Marshall Brenden 18225 SE 1281h Renton WA 98059 LOJP0006/LOJTY 403-Liberty Grove Carolyn Ann Buckett 16524 SE 145th St. Renton WA 98059 Kathy Graves 13020 -160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Victor & Gwendolyn High 13405-158th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Don & Diane Kezele 15657 SE 137th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Leroy Nass 15713 SE 128th St. Renton WA 98059 Larry & Susan Oord 16013 SE 136th St. Renton WA 98059 Resident 13020-160thAve. SE Renton WA 98059 Deborah Stewart 16207 SE 136th St. Renton WA 98059 Mr. & Mrs. Bob Wilmot 13900 -160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Greg Borba DDESILUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 Kristen Langley DDES/LUSD Land Use Traffic MS OAK-DE-0100 Steve Townsend DDES/LUSD Land Use Inspections MS OAK-DE-0100 Thomas Cartyle PO Box 581 Tacoma WA 98401 Brad & Julie Herrin 16202 SE 137th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Wayne.Jones Lakeridge Development Inc. PO.Box 146 Renton WA 98057 Milton & Helen Lee P.O. Box 2574 Renton WA 98056 Kathy Nelson Transportation Dept. 805 -2nd Ave. S. Issaquah WA 98027 David & Georgia Platt 510 Panoramic Dr. Camano Island WA 98282 Mike Romano Centurion Development Services 22617 8th Drive SE Bothell WA 98021 Jesse Thatcher 13817 -162nd Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Kevin M. Wyman 16540 SE 149th St. Renton WA 98059 Kim Claussen DDES/LUSD Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 Carol Rogers DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 Larry West DDES/LUSD Geo Review MS OAK-DE-0100 Melvin L. Daley DMP, INC 726 Auburn Way N Auburn WA 98002 Gwendolyn High P.O. Box 2936 Renton WA 98056 Edward June & Kris HiU 13527156thAve. SE Renton WA 98059 Rebecca Lind City ofRenton, EDNSP 1055 S. Grady Way Renton WA 98056 Richard & Anita Oliphant 16519 SE 145th St. Renton WA 98059 Guy Platz 13535 -160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Seattle KC Health Dept. E. Dist. Environ. Health 14350 SE Eastgate Way Bellevue WA 98007 Mike Tull 16056 SE 136th SL Renton WA 98059 Gregg Zimmerman City of Renton-Planning 1055 S Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Nick Gillen DDESILUSD Sile Development Services MS OAK-DE-0100 Karen Scharer DDESILUSD Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 Bruce Whittaker DDESILUSD Prel. Review Engineer MS OAK-DE-0100 13 L03P0006/L03TY403-Liberty Grove 14 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL In order to appeal the decision of the Examiner, written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the King County Council with a fee of$250.00 (check payable to King County Office of Finance) on or before March 8, 2004. if a notice of appeal is filed, the original and six (6) copies of a written appeal statement specifying the basis for the appeal and argument in support of the appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the King County Council. on or before March 15, 2004. Appeal statements may refer only to facts contained in the hearing record; new facts may not be presented on appeal. Filing requires actual delivery to the Office of the Clerk of the Council, Room 1025, King County Courthouse, 516 3'd Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104, prior to the close ofbusiness (4:30 p.m.) on the date due. Prior mailing is not sufficient if actual receipt by the Clerk does not occur within the applicable time period. The Examiner does not have authority to extend the time period unless the Office of the Clerk is not open on the specified closing date, in which event delivery prior to the close of business on the next business day is sufficient to meet the filing requirement. !fa written notice of appeal and filing fee are not filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date of this report, or if a written appeal statement and argument are not,filed within twenty-one (21) calendar days of the date of this report, the decision of the hearing examiner contained herein shall be the final decision of King County without the need for further action by the Council. MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY I 0, 2004, PUBLIC HEARING ON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FILE NOS. L03P0005/LIBERTY GROVE CONTIGUOUS (LGC) AND L03P0006/L03TY4031LIBERTY GROVE (LG}. James N. O'Connor was the Hearing Examiner in this matter. Participating in the hearing were Karen Scharer, Bruce Whittaker, Nick Gillen and Kristen Langley, representing the Department; Wayne Jones and Dave Casey, representing the Appellant; Gwendolyn High, Intervenor for C.A.R.E. and Anita Oliphant, Kristy Hill, Mary Brotherton, Diane Kezele, Rhonda Bryant, and Joann Lee. The following exhibits were offered and entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1 LGC -DOES File L03P0005 Exhibit No. 2 LG-DOES File L03P0006 Exhibit No. 3 LGC -ODES Preliminary Report for L03P0005, Prepared January 26, 2004 with attachments as follows: 3. I 36 Lot Plat Design 3.2 Density Calculations R-4 w/4 TDRs 3.3 Issaquah School District 3.4 Certificate of Water Availability dated January 8, 2003 3.5 City of Renton Letters, including the Sewer Certificate 3.6 Certificate of Transportation Concurrency Exhibit No. 4 LG-ODES Preliminary Report for L03P0006, Prepared January 26, 2004 with attachments as follows: 4.1 24 Lot Plat Design 4.2 Density Calculations R-4 w/5 TDRs L03P0006/L03TY 403-Liberty Grove Exhibit No. 5 Exhibit No. 6 Exhibit No. 7 Exhibit No. 8 Exhibit No. 9 Exhibit No. I 0 Exhibit No. 11 Exhibit No. 12 Exhibit No. 13 Exhibit No. 14 Exhibit No. 15 Exhibit No. 16 Exhibit No. 17 Exhibit No. 18 Exhibit No. 19 Exhibit No. 20 Exhibit No. 21 Exhibit No. 22 Exhibit No. 23 Exhibit No. 24 Exhibit No. 25 Exhibit No. 26 Exhibit No. 27 Exhibit No. 28 Exhibit No. 29 Exhibit No. 30 Exhibit No. 31 Exhibit No. 32 4.3 Issaquah School District 4.4 Certificate of Water Availability dated January 8, 2003 4.5 City of Renton Letters, including Sewer Certificate 4.6 Certificate of Transportation Concurrency Corrections/Revisions of Conditions to DOES Preliminary Reports (Conditions 7.d. & 12.d) dated February 9, 2004 -Not Entered into the Record LGC -Application for Land Use Permit/Plat L03P0005 Received March 11, 2003 LG-Application for Land Use Pennit/Plt L03P0006 received March 11, 2003 LGC-Revised Environmental Checklist Received September 3, 2003 LG -Revised Environmental Checklist Received September 3, 2003 LGC -Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance dated December 16, 2003 LG -Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance dated December 16, 2003 LGC -Affidavit of Revised Posting Indicating Posting Date of June 2, 2003 And received June 3, 2003 LG -Affidavit of Posting Indicating Posting Date of June 2, 2003 and received June 3, 2003 LGC-Revised Site Plan (36 Lot Preliminary Plat Map) received September 3, 2003 LG-Revised Site Plan (24 Lot Preliminary Plat Map) received September 3, 2003 Assessors Maps (2) SE 14-23-05 Revised February<3, 2000 & NE 14-23-05 Revised February 28, 2000 Letter w/attachments to DOES from Wayne Jones; Re: Intent to sell TOR-Density Credits dated April 23, 2003 Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Gary A. Norris of ON Traffic Consultants dated February 7, 2003 and received March 11, 2003 R.evised Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Gary A. Norris ofDN Traffic Consultants dated June 24, 2003 and received September 3, 2003 Walkway Study Prepared by DMP, Inc. dated August 18, 2003 LGC-Walkway Study Map Annotated by DOES prepared February 9, 2004 March I 0, 2003 email from Issaquah School District to Ted Cooper regarding School walkways to Liberty High, Maywood Middle and Briarwood Elementary School for plat conditions of LOOP0023 Level One Off-Site Analysis prepared by Daley-Morrow-Poblete, Inc. dated March 3, 2003 Revised Level One Off-Site Analysis prepared by Daley-Morrow-Poblete, Inc. Dated July 11, 2003 Conceptual Drainage Plan received March 11, 2003 Additional Downstream Information received November 25, 2003 LG -Letter to Wayne Jones and Mel Daley from James Sanders and Jim Chan Dated December 4, 2003 regarding drainage adjustment (L03V0065) Wetland Evaluation and Delineation Report and Wildlife Habitat Evaluation By Habitat Technologies dated November 5, 2002 LGC -Letter to Wayne Jones from Mark Heckert of H&S Consulting dated July 18, 2003; Addendum to the Wetland Evaluation and Delineation Report LGC -Tributary Area Map Annotations by DOES; Prepared February 2004 Letter to Karen Scharer from Anita & Richard Oliphant dated January 29, 2004 Requesting comments to LOIPOOl6 & L03RE038 be considered in this matter Letter to Karen Scharer from Steven & Joann Lee dated February 2, 2004 Regarding claim of adverse possession along south property line of LGC 15 L03P0006/L03TY 403-Liberty Grove Exhibit No. 33 Hearing Examiner Report & Decision for Evendell/LOIP0016/L03RE038 Issued February 4, 2004 Exhibit No. 34 Email from Shirley Day to Karen Scharer dated February 3, 2004 Exhibit No. 35 Email from Glenda Johnson to Karen Scharer dated February I 0, 2004 Exhibit No. 36 Letter from Bill & Dona Mokin to Karen Scharer dated February 7, 2004 Exhibit No. 37 Photograph of driveway located at SE 136th/1601h on February 4, 2004 Exhibit No. 38 C.A.R.E. Response: Liberty Grove/Liberty Grove Contiguous Plat Applications L03P0006&L03P0005 Exhibit No. 39 C.A.R.E. Households List Exhibit No. 40 Community Map Exhibit No. 41 March and April 2000 Press Releases from King County Executive Ron Sims Exhibit No. 42 King County Metro Six Year Transit Development Plan, February 2002 Exhibit No. 43 Report of the King County General Government Budget Advisory Task Force To County Executive Ron Sims dated June 25, 2003 Exhibit No. 44 A Joint City Position -The Cities' Suggestions for Inclusion in the King County Budget Advisory Task Force's Recommendations dated March 12, 2003 Exhibit No. 45 Message to Employees from King County Executive Ron Sims; General Budget Advisory Task Force Recommendations dated July 9, 2003 Exhibit No. 46 King County Council Budget & Fiscal Management Committee Capital Budget Plan, 2004 CIP Overview Exhibit No. 47 In Transportation -Facing the Budget's Challenges from Harold Taniguchi Dated November 3, 2003 Exhibit No. 48 High Accident Locations Report dated July 2003 Exhibit No. 49 Transportation Service Areas 2000 Exhibit No. 50 King County Concurrency Maps 2001, 2002 and 2003 Exhibit No. 51 Transportation Concurrency Detail Comparison Graphic Exhibit No. 52 City of Renton Long Range Wastewater Management Plan (Excerpts) Exhibit No. 53 2003 King County Annual Growth Report Exhibit No. 54 King County Benchmark Report -2003 (Land use -excerpts) Exhibit No. 55 Buildable Lands Report-Dated August 29, 2002 (Excerpts) Exhibit No. 56 State, County, City Populations Exhibit No. 57 City of Renton Economic Development, Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning Department Reports (June 3, 2003; September 23, 2003; October I, 2003; October 10, 2003) Exhibit No. 58 Renton Planning Commission Recommendation dated October 22, 2003 Exhibit No. 59 City of Renton Ordinance No. 5026 Exhibit No. 60 Renton City Council Meeting Minutes dated November 24, 2003 Exhibit No. 61 C.A.R.E. Member's Letters Detailing Adverse Impacts from High Density Development in this Community Exhibit No. 62 City of Renton Proposed Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Exhibit No. 63 Two Photographs oflntersection Exhibit No. 64 Two Photographs of SE 1441h/62nd Ave. SE Exhibit No. 65 List oflndividuals and Their Addresses in Attendance Exhibit No. 66 Letter to Karen Scharer from Claude R. & Eloise M. Stachowiak Dated November 16, 2003 16 L03P0006/LOJTY 403-Liberty Grove Exhibit No. 67 Letter to the Hearing Examiner from Kristy J. Hill dated February I 0, 2004 Exhibit No. 68 Letter to the Hearing Examiner from Edward & June Hill dated February 10, 2004 JOC:gao L03P0006/L03TY 403 RPT 17 TO: RE: OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 400 Yesler Way, Room 404 Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 296-4660 Facsimile (206) 296-1654 NOTICE OF APPEAL Parties and Interested Persons Clerk of the Council Department of Development and Environmental Services File Nos. L03P0006,L03P0005,L03P0015 March 19,2004 Written appeal statements have been submitted by Gwendolyn High on behalf of Citizens' Alliance for a Responsible Evendell (C.A.R.E.), in the above-referenced matters. Copies may be obtained from this office. Any party of record ( other than an appellant replying to his/her own appeal) may respond in writing by submitting an original response statement and four copies to the Clerk of the Council, Room WI025, King County Courthouse, 516-3'd Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104 by April 2, 2004. Written responses should not include references to facts that are outside the hearing record. (Please note: The Office of the Clerk closes at 4:30 p.m. Facsimile and email transmissions are not accepted by the Clerk as forms of delivery.) The Metropolitan King County Council will decide these appeals based on the record from the Examiner's hearing and the issues raised within the written appeal statements and the responses thereto. You will be notified of the date for the consideration of the appeals by the Council. However, presentation of oral argument is at the discretion of the Council and limited to parties to the appeal (those persons who have filed written appeal statements or responses within the allowed time period, plus the applicant who is a necessary party). Generally, only one person supporting and one person opposing each appeal is permitted to address the Council. Please Note: A party who wishes to respond to any one or more of the appeal statements in these matters (Liberty Grove, Liberty Grove Contiguous and Nichols Place) may, at the party's option, submit a single document, suitably captioned as applicable to one, two or all three of these appeals. The original and four copies should be submitted for the first application to which the response applies, and one additional signed copy for each additional application to which it applies. MAIN FILE COPY @ • TO: RE: OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER King County, Washington NOTICE OF APPEAL MEETING DATE PARTIES AND INTERESTED PERSONS Department of Development and Environmental Services Files: L03RE038, Evendell Plat Revision; L03P0006, Liberty Grove L03P0005, Liberty Grove Contiguous And L03POO 15, Nichols Place Proposed Ordinances: 2003-0490 2004-0006 2004-0005 2004-0013 )100 Action on the appeals from the Decisions of the King County Hearing Examiner on the above referenced applications is scheduled to be taken by the Metropolitan King County Council at its meeting on May 10, 2004 at 9:30 a.m., or as soon thereafter as possible, in Room 1001, Council Chambers, King County Courthouse, 516 -3"' Avenue, Seattle, Washington. In order to assist the members of the Council in considering appeals from the Hearing Examiner, the Examiner prepares packages of summary information ("Appeal Packages"). Attached to this notice is the tables of contents of each of the "Appeal Packages" prepared for these appeal proceedings, as well as copies of the Examiner's summary of issues on appeal. These packages are delivered to the members of the Council in advance of the time set for oral appeal arguments. The complete record of the public hearing is also available to the members of the Council for review at their convenience. Presentation of oral arguments to the Council is usually limited to parties to the appeal (those persons who have filed written appeal statements or responses thereto within the allowed time periods). Normally each party to the appeal, or the party's representative, is allowed a brief time set by the Council to make an oral presentation. If there are multiple parties, generally only one person supporting and one person opposing the appeal may provide oral argument, unless all parties supporting a common position agree to a division of time among themselves, or different time allowances are set by the Council. The time limit on presentations is usually ten minutes, which does not include time spent responding to questions by the Council. The Council may also address questions to other persons who are present. All persons who are given an opportunity to speak should keep in mind that the Council's consideration of these appeals is limited by King County Code Section 20.24.220 to the record of the hearing before the Examiner. Therefore, no new evidence may be introduced, and references to factual information must be limited to matters that previously have been introduced into evidence. Any contact with a member of the Council concerning these appeals prior to final action by the Council is prohibited by law. DATED this 28th day of April 2004. es N. O' nnor pro tern ~ ing County Hearing Examiner MAIN FILE COP . Ordinance Concurring with Examiner's Reconunendation Vicinity Map Examiner's Sununary of Appeal Issues Appeal Arguments C.A.R.E./Gwendolyn High Appeal Responses TABLE OF CONTENTS U.S. Land Development Association Shirley Day Examiner's Report and Decision Department of Development and Environmental Services Preliminary Report Department of Development and Environmental Services Corrections to the Preliminary Report Page No. 3 4 6 19 34 35 49 69 EXAMINER'S SUMMARY OF APPEAL ARGUMENTS RE: Department of Development and Environmental Services File No. L03P0015 1. Proposed Ordinance No. 2004-0013 Nichols Place Preliminary Plat and Proposal for Transfer of Density Credits Examiner: James N. O'Connor 2. Parties to the Appeal: Appellants: Respondents: 3. Location: Citizens Alliance for a Responsible Evendell ("C.A.R.E."), represented by Gwendolyn High U.S. Land Development Association, Represented by Duana Kolouskova Shirley Day West of 160th A venue Southeast, south of Southeast !38'h Street (if extended) at 13815-160th Avenue Southeast 4. Issues on Appeal: A. Should the transfer of eight (8) density credits to this site be approved, to permit the development of23 lots on 3.82 acres in the R-4 zone? B. Should additional conditions be placed on the revised plat to reduce the danger from trees on adjacent properties that may be damaged or exposed to wind as a result of the development? 5. Appellant's Arguments: A. There is not a shortage of housing capacity that requires additional density on this property. The transfer of density credits to this site is inconsistent with County Wide Planning Policies and Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies, as required by KCC 21 A.37 .0 I 0. This location is not one where necessary infrastructure already exists or can be provided at the lowest public cost. Although located in the Renton potential annexation area, required interlocal agreements have not been made by King County with Renton. King County has failed to address issues raised by the City of Renton. New development in existing neighborhoods should build on existing patterns. This neighborhood is now divided into lots ranging from 15,000 square feet to I Y. acres, 6. giving an overall impression of a suburban or somewhat rural area. It is isolated from fully developed areas. B. DOES proposed a condition for the adjacent plat ofEvendell to protect trees on the property adjacent to the west ofEvendell by establishing an easement over the drip line areas on the Evendell property. Removal of trees on the subject property will expose offsite trees to winds that creates a risk to the safety of adjacent property owners. Respondent's Arguments: A. The County's Transfer of Density Rights ("TDR") program designates areas within the county that may receive density credits. A site within a designated receiving area has an outright ability to use density credits. A proposed development using density credits is processed as a regular subdivision, without additional subjective review related to the use of density credits. This property is in a designated receiving area, being in an unincorporated urban area zoned R-4. KCC 21A.37.030 (A)(l). R-4 allows a maximum density of 6 dwelling units per acre using density credits. The proposed plat revision is within that maximum. A new TDR review process that would apply Countywide Planning Policies and the Comprehensive Plan directly to a subdivision is not contained in the county code or permitted by state law. No code provision bars development in an area not subject to an interlocal agreement. The City of Renton supported this subdivision by allowing 23 sewer hook-ups for the property. B. No county code provision addresses impact to trees on adjacent properties. There is no legal basis to impose additional conditions. Examiner's Recommendation: No change from March 2, 2004 decision. Ordinance Concurring with Examiner's Reconunendation Vicinity Map Examiner's Sununary of Appeal Issues Appeal Arguments C.A.R.E./Gwendolyn High Appeal Responses Lakeridge Development Shirley Day Examiner's Report and Decision TABLE OF CONTENTS Department of Development and Environmental Services Preliminary Report Page No. 2 3 4 6 19 33 34 51 EXAMINER'S SUMMARY OF APPEAL ARGUMENTS RE: Department of Development and Environmental Services File No. L03P0005 I. Proposed Ordinance No. 2004-0005 Liberty Grove Contiguous Preliminary Plat and Proposal for Transfer of Density Credits Examiner: James N. O'Connor 2. Parties to the Appeal: Appellants: Respondents: 3. Location: Citizens Alliance for a Responsible Evendell ("C.A.R.E. "), represented by Gwendolyn High Lakeridge Development, Represented by Duana Kolouskova Shirley Day South of Southeast 136'h Street, between 160th A venue Southeast and 162"• Avenue Southeast 4. Issue on Appeal: 5. Should the transfer of a maximum of five (5) density credits to this site be approved, to permit the development of36 lots on 7.92 acres in the R-4 zone? Appellant's Arguments: There is not a shortage of housing capacity that requires additional density on this property. The transfer of density credits to this site is inconsistent with County Wide Planning Policies and Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies, as required by KCC 21A.37.0IO. This location is not one where necessary infrastructure already exists or can be provided at the lowest public cost. Although located in the Renton potential annexation area, required interlocal agreements have. not been made by King County with Renton. King County has failed to address issues raised by the City of Renton. New development in existing neighborhoods should build on existing patterns. This neighborhood is now divided into lots ranging from 15,000 square feet to I Y. acres, giving an overall impression of a suburban or somewhat rural area. It is isolated from fully developed areas. Respondent's Arguments: The County's Transfer of Density Rights ("TOR") program designates areas within the county that may receive density credits. A site within a designated receiving area has an outright ability to use density credits. A proposed development using density credits is processed as a regular subdivision, without additional subjective review related to the use of density credits. This property is in a designated receiving area, being in an unincorporated urban area zoned R-4. KCC 21 A.37.030 (A)(!). R-4 allows a maximum density of 6 dwelling units per acre using density credits. The proposed plat revision is within that maximum. A new TOR review process that would apply Countywide Planning Policies and the Comprehensive Plan directly to a subdivision is not contained in the county code or permitted by state law. No code provision bars development in an area not subject to an interlocal agreement. The City of Renton supported this subdivision by allowing sewer hook-ups for the property. 6. Examiner's Recommendation: No change from February 27, 2004 decision Ordinance Concurring with Examiner's Recommendation Vicinity Map Examiner's Summary of Appeal Issues Appeal Arguments C.A.R.E./Gwendolyn High Appeal Responses Lakeridge Development Shirley Day Examiner's Report and Decision TABLE OF CONTENTS Department of Development and Environmental Services Preliminary Report Page No. 2 3 5 7 19 33 34 51 EXAMINER'S SUMMARY OF APPEAL ARGUMENTS RE: Department of Development and Environmental Services File No. L03P0006 I. Proposed Ordinance No. 2004-0006 Liberty Grove Preliminary Plat and Proposal for Transfer of Density Credits Examiner: James N. O'Connor 2. Parties to the Appeal: 3. 4. Appellants: Respondents: Location: Issue on Appeal: Citizens Alliance for a Responsible Evendell (C.A.R.E.}, represented by Gwendolyn High Lakeridge Development, Represented by Duana Kolouskova Shirley Day North of Southeast 1361h Street, between 1601h Avenue Southeast and 1581h Avenue Southeast Should the transfer of five (5) density credits to this site be approved, to allow the development of 24 lots on 4.84 acres in the R-4 zone? 5. Appellant's Arguments: There is not a shortage of housing capacity that requires additional density on this property. The transfer of density credits to this site is inconsistent with County Wide Planning Policies and Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies, as required by KCC 21A.37.010. This location is not one where necessary infrastructure already exists or can be provided at the lowest public cost. Although located in the Renton potential annexation area, required interlocal agreements have not been made by King County with Renton. King County has failed to address issues raised by the City of Renton. New development in existing neighborhoods should build on existing patterns. This neighborhood is now divided into lots ranging from 15,000 square feet to I Y. acres, giving an overall impression of a suburban or somewhat rural area. It is isolated from fully developed areas. Respondent's Arguments: The County's Transfer of Density Rights ("TOR") program designates areas within the county that may receive density credits. A site within a designated receiving area has an outright ability to use density credits. A proposed development using density credits is processed as a regular subdivision, without additional subjective review related to the use of density credits. This property is in a designated receiving area, being in an unincorporated urban area zoned R-4. KCC 21A.37.030 (A)(]). R-4 allows a maximum density of6 dwelling units per acre using density credits. The proposed plat revision is within that maximum. A new TOR review process that would apply Countywide Planning Policies and the Comprehensive Plan directly to a subdivision is not contained in the county code or permitted by state law. No code provision bars development in an area not subject to an interlocal agreement. The City of Renton supported this subdivision by allowing sewer hook-ups for the property. 6. Examiner's Recommendation: No change from February 23, 2004 decision. Ordinance Concurring with Examiner's Recommendation Vicinity Map Examiner's Summary of Appeal Issues Appeal Arguments C.A.R.E./Gwendolyn High Appeal Responses TABLE OF CONTENTS U.S. Land Development Association Examiner's Report and Decision Department of Development and Environmental Services Preliminary Report Department of Development and Environmental Services Corrections to the Preliminary Report Page No. 1 3 4 6 20 38 59 83 EXAMINER'S SUMMARY OF APPEAL ARGUMENTS RE: Department of Development and Environmental Services File No. L03RE038 I. 2. 3. Proposed Ordinance No. 2003-0490. l Evendell Revision Preliminary Plat Revision and Proposal for Transfer of Density Credits Examiner: Parties to the Appeal: Appellants: Respondent: Location: James N. O'Connor Citizens Alliance for a Responsible Evendell (C.A.R.E.), represented by Gwendolyn High U.S. Land Development Association, Represented by Duana Kolouskova Lying South of Southeast 136"' Street, between 156"' Avenue Southeast and 160'" Avenue Southeast 4. Issues on Appeal: A. Should the transfer of 20 density credits to this site be approved, to permit revision of this preliminary plat to allow the development of70 lots on 12.43 acres in the R-4 zone? B. Should additional conditions be placed on the revised plat to reduce the danger from trees on adjacent properties that may be damaged or exposed to wind as a result of the development? 5. Appellant's Arguments: A. There is not a shortage of housing capacity that requires additional density on this property. The transfer of density credits to this site is inconsistent with County Wide Planning Policies and Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies, as required by KCC 21A.37.0 I 0. This location is not one where necessary infrastructure already exists or can be provided at the lowest public cost. Although located in the Renton potential annexation area, required interlocal agreements have not been made by King County with Renton. King County has failed to address issues raised by the City of Renton. New development in existing neighborhoods should build on existing patterns. This neighborhood is now divided into lots ranging from 15,000 square feet to I \4 acres, giving an overall impression of a suburban or somewhat rural area. It is isolated from fully developed areas. 6. B. DDES proposed a condition to protect trees on the adjacent property to the west by establishing an easement over the drip line areas on the subject property. Removal of trees on the subject property exposes offsite trees to winds that creates a risk to the safety of adjacent property owners. Respondent's Arguments: A. The County's Transfer of Density Rights ("TDR") program designates areas within the county that may receive density credits. A site within a designated receiving area has an outright ability to use density credits. A proposed development using density credits is processed as a regular subdivision, without additional subjective review related to the use of density credits. This property is in a designated receiving area, being in an unincorporated urban area zoned R-4. KCC 21A.37.030 (A)(l). R-4 allows a maximum density of 6 dwelling units per acre using density credits. The proposed plat revision is within that maximum. A new TDR review process that would apply Countywide Planning Policies and the Comprehensive Plan directly to a subdivision is not contained in the county code or permitted by state law. No code provision bars development in an area not subject to an interlocal agreement. The City of Renton supported this subdivision by allowing 75 sewer hook-ups for the property. B. No county code provision addresses impact to trees on adjacent properties. There is no legal basis to impose additional conditions. Examiner's Recommendation: No change from February 4, 2004 decision. , OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 400 Yesler Way, Room 404 Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 296-4660 Facsimile (206) 296-1654 January 9, 2004 NOTICE OF HEARING SUBJECT: Department of Development and Environmental Services File Nos. L03P0005/L03TY 401 And L03P0006/L03TY403 Proposed Ordinance Nos. 2004-0005; 2004-0006 LIBERTY GROVE CONTIGUOUS/LIBERTY GROVE Plat Applications and Rezones Location: Applicant: South of Southeast 1361h Street, between 160th A venue Southeast and 162"• A venue Southeast North of Southeast 136th Street, between 158th Avenue Southeast and 160th Avenue Southeast Lakeridge Development Attn: Wayne Jones P.O. Box 146 Renton, Washington 98057 Telephone: (425) 228-9750 King County: Department of Development and Environmental Services, represented by Karen Scharer 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Telephone: (206) 296-7114 Facsimile: (206) 296-6613 A public hearing has been scheduled on this proposal for 9:30 a.m., on Tuesday, February 10, 2004, in the Department of Development and Environmental Services Hearing Room, 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW, Renton, Washington. A pre-hearing conference may be requested by any party prior to January 27, 2004. ("Parties" include the applicant, property owner and responsible County agency. Other persons likely to be directly and substantially affected by County action on this proposal may request "party" status by submitting an intervenor petition to the Hearing Examiner.) Hearing Examiner Rule VIII, which is included with this notice, governs pre-hearing conferences. If you are a party to this proceeding and believe a pre-hearing conference should be held prior to the public hearing, submit your written request with specific reasons in support thereof to the King County Hearing Examiner. MAIN F1LE COPY @ L03P0005/L03P0006---Liberty Grove Contiguous/Liberty Grove 2 To promote efficiency in the conduct of hearings and to eliminate surprise, pre-hearing exchange of information is encouraged by the Rules of Procedure. Any person is entitled to receive, at cost, copies of documents in the County file. Application may also be made to the Examiner to direct exchange of other significant information by any person or agency. Mediation of disputes is available pursuant to King County Code Section 20.24.330 and Rules of Mediation. Please contact the Office of the Hearing Examiner if you need a copy of the Rules of Procedure or Rules of Mediation, or obtain the Rules by visiting our web site at www.metrokc.gov/mkcc/hearingexaminer._ ORDERED this 9th day of January, 2004. TRANSMITTED this 9th day of January, 2004, to the following parties and interested persons: William J. Bowen Wilma J. Bowen Marshall Brenden Bowen Revocable Living Trust 13644 -160th Ave. SE 18225 SE 128th 13644 -160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98055 Melvin L. Daley Kathy Graves Brad & Julie Herrin DMP, INC 13020 -160th Ave. SE 16202 SE 137th Pl. 726 Auburn Way N Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Auburn WA 98002 Gwendolyn High Victor & Gwendolyn High Wayne Jones P.O. Box 2936 13405 -158th Ave. SE Lakeridge Development Inc. Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98059 PO Box 146 Renton WA 98057 Milton & Helen Lee Rebecca Lind Leroy Nass P.O. Box 2574 City of Renton, EDNSP 15713 SE 128th St. Renton WA 98056 1055 S. Grady Way Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98055 Larry & Susan Oard David & Georgia Platt Guy Platz 16013 SE 136th St. 510 Panoramic Dr. 13535 • 160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Camano Island WA 98282 Renton WA 98059 Resident Seattle KC Health Dept. Deborah Stewart 13020 • 160th Ave. SE E. Dist. Environ. Health 16207 SE 136th St Renton WA 98059 14350 SE Eastgate Way Renton WA 98059 Bellevue WA 98007 Jesse Thatcher Mike Tull Mr. & Mrs. Bob Wilmot 13817 -162nd Ave. SE 16056 SE 136th St. 13900 • 160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Kevin M. Wyman Gregg Zimmerman Greg Borba 16540 SE 149th St City of Renton-Planning DDES/LUSD Renton WA 98059 1055 s Grady Way MS OAK-DE-0100 Renton WA 98055 ' • L03P0005/L03P0006-Liberty Grove Contiguous/Liberty Grove 3 Kim Claussen Nick Gillen Krtsten Langley DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD Current Planning Site Development Services Land Use Traffic MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 Carol Rogers Karen Scharer Steve Townsend DDES/LUSD DDESILUSD DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 Current Planning Land Use Inspections MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 Larry West Bruce Whittaker DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD Geo Review Prel. Review Engineer MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 NOTE: If the Renton School District announces a district-wide school closure due to adverse weather conditions or similar area emergency, the public hearing on this matter will be postponed. Parties of record will be notified of the time and date of the rescheduled hearing. Any questions regarding postponements and rescheduling can be directed to the Hearing Examiner's Office at (206) 296-4660. Sign language and communication material in alternate formats can be arranged given sufficient notice at SLS:gao L03P0005-L03P0006 NOT Attachment 296-1000 (TDD number 296-1024). ---••••• •••• ••••• - RULES OF PROCEDURE OF Tiffi KING COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER Rule VIII. PRE-HEARING CONFERENCES A. Purpose and Initiation Pre-hearing conferences promote efficient case management by providing an informal process for early identification of issues and resolution of procedural matters in complex cases. Evidence generally will not be received at a pre-hearing conference, except when required in order for the examiner to rule on a motion. (Pre-marking and introduction of exhibits to which there is no objection may occur at the discretion of the examiner.) The examiner, on motion of any party or upon his/her own motion, may convene a pre-hearing conference to: 1. Identify, clarify, limit or simplify issues. 2. Hear and consider pre-hearing motions. 3. Schedule hearings, identify parties and witnesses, determine the order of and limits upon testimony, obtain stipulations as to facts and law, identify and admit exhibits, order discovery, and consider and act upon any other matter which may aid in the efficient disposition of the hearing. B. Requests for Conference A motion to convene a pre-hearing conference shall be made to the examiner as soon as the need for a conference is recognized by the moving party (at least 21 days prior to the scheduled hearing date), and shall state the reasons for the request, including any motions to be presented. For good cause stated in the motion, the examiner may consider a request that fails to meet the 21-day requirement. For hearings authorized under KCC 20.24.080, a motion by any party for a pre-hearing conference shall be granted if timely. However, unless consented to by all parties or otherwise ordered for good cause by the examiner, no pre-hearing conference on an appeal can be convened later than 45 days after receipt of the statement of appeal by the hearing examiner's office. C. Proceedings at Conference A party who has received timely notice of a pre-hearing conference shall identify at the conference any pre-hearing motions not previously made which he/she intends to make. Parties or interested persons may also file timely written pre-hearing motions for consideration at the pre- hearing conference. Failure to make or disclose a motion which was available to the party at the time of the conference may be grounds for its denial if subsequently made. D. Pre-hearing Order Following a pre-hearing conference, the examiner shall issue an order specifying all items determined at the conference. The order shall be binding upon all parties and interested persons who received timely notice of the conference. Revised March 31, 1995 \ DIRECTlv,.JS TO DDES HEARING ROOl\n 900 OAKESDALE AVE SW, RENTON SOUTHBOUND 1-5 • • EXIT 157 -Marting Luther King Way Tum RIGHT onto 68th Ave. S. 6ff' Ave. S. becomes MONSTER RD. SW Monster Rd turns into OAKESDALE AVE SW DDES is on your left (building 900) NORTHBOUND 1-5 • EXIT 154 to 1-405/WA-518/Burien/Renton Stay right to 1-405/Renton/Bellevue • 1-405 EXIT 1 to WA-181/W. Valley Hwy. • LEFT onto W. Valley Hwy/SR 181 • RIGITT onto East Grady Way • LEFT onto Oakesdale Ave. SW DDES is on your right (building 900) NORTHBOUND SR 167 Northbound under the 1-405 overpass • LEFT at SW 7th St. (2 00 light) • LEFT onto Oakesdale Ave. SW DDES is on your left (building 900) SOUTHBOUND 1-405 • EXIT 2 to WA-167/Auburn/Rainier Ave. • Follow to SR-167 (Valley Fwy.) north • LEFT onto SW Grady Way • RIGHT onto Oakesdale Ave. SW DDES is on your right (building 900) NORTHBOUND 1-405 • EXIT 1 to Interurban Ave. S/West Valley Hwy • LEFT at light at ramp bottom (north under 1-405) • RIGHT onto SW Grady Way • LEFT onto Oakesdale Ave. SW DDES is on your right (building 900) SW 7™ STREET SW GRADY WAY s -.E G:\working\Misc\Hex\DDES directions.doc OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 400 Yesler Way, Room 404 Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 296-4660 Facsimile (206) 296-1654 February 23, 2004 REPORT AND DECISION SUBJECT: Department of Development and Environmental Services File Nos. L03P0006/L03TY403 Proposed Ordinance Nos. 2004-0004; 2004-0006 LIBERTY GROVE Proposed Preliminary Plat and Proposal for Transfer of Density Credits Location: Applicant: North of Southeast 136th Street, between 160th Avenue Southeast and 15 8th A venue Southeast Lakeridge Development Attn: Wayne Jones P.O. Box 146 Renton, Washington 98057 Telephone: (425) 228-9750 Intervenor: C.A.R.E., represented by Gwendolyn High 13405 -158th Avenue Southeast Renton, Washington 98059 King County: Department of Development and Environmental Services, represented by Karen Scharer 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Telephone: (206) 296-7114 Facsimile: (206) 296-6613 SUMMARY OF DECISION/RECOMMENDATION: Department's Preliminary Recommendation: Department's Final Recommendation: Examiner's Decision: Approve, subject to conditions Approve, subject to conditions (modified) Approve, subject to conditions (modified) MAIN FILE COP@ L03P0006/L03TY 403~Liberty Grove EXAMINER PROCEEDINGS: Hearing opened: Hearing closed: 2 February 10, 2004 February 10, 2004 Participants at the public hearing and the exhibits offered and entered are listed in the attached minutes. A verbatim recording of the hearing is available in the office of the King County Hearing Examiner. ISSUES/TOPICS ADDRESSED , Transfer of density credits , Surface water drainage , Road improvements , Safe walking conditions SUMMARY Application for transfer of a maximum of 5 density credits, and approval of a preliminary plat to subdivide approximately 4.84 acres into 24 lots in the urban area, are granted preliminary approval. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. General Information: Proponent: Representative: Intervenor: Wayne Jones, Jr. Lakeridge Development Inc. PO Box 146 Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-228-9750 e-mail: joneswayne@qwest.net Mel L. Daley, P.E. Daley-Morrow-Poblete, Inc. Auburn Way North Phone: 253-333-2200 Facsimile: 253-333-2206 C.A.R.E., represented by Gwendolyn High 13405 -158th Avenue Southeast Renton, Washington 98059 Location: Lying south of SE 136th St. between 160th Ave. SE and 162th Ave. SE. Section/Township/Range: SE 14-23-05 Parcel # 3664500141 Acreage Plat: 4.84 acres L03P0006/L03TY 403-Liberty Grove Current Zoning: R-4 Number of Lots: Proposed -24 w/5 TDR Density: 5.2 dwellings per acre Lot Size: generally 6,000 square feet Proposed Use: single family Sewage Disposal: City of Renton Water Supply: Water District #90 Fire District: King County Fire District# 25 School District: Issaquah Community Plan: Newcastle Drainage Subbasin: Lower Cedar River King County Permits: Rezone and Subdivision Complete Application Date: May 15, 2003 (Date Plat Filed March 11, 2003 & Rezone May 7, 2004) Threshold Determination: Mitigated Determination ofNonsignificance (MDNS) Date of Issuance: December 16, 2003 KC Permit Contact: Karen Scharer, Project Manager II, Current Planning Section, LUSD Phone # 296-7114 or e-mail at karen.scharer@metrokc.gov 3 2. Except as modified herein, the facts set forth in the DDES preliminary report to the Hearing Examiner for the February 10, 2004, public hearing are found to be correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. Said report is exhibit no. 4 in the hearing record. 3. The Applicant's request to reclassify the subject property from R4 to R6 was withdrawn prior to commencement of the hearing. 4. On February 4, 2004 the King County Hearing Examiner issued his report and decision granting preliminary approval for the revised plat ofEvendell, based upon transfer of20 density credits that would allow for development of70 lots on 12.43 acres. This would provide a density of5.6 dwelling units per acre on the Evendell property, which is directly south, across Southeast 136th Street, from the subject property. The Examiner's decision approving the Evendell plat revision, File No. LOIP0016, is exhibit no. 33 in the hearing record of this proceeding. 5. Directly east, north and west of the subject property are suburban-sized lots, ranging from approximately 9,000 to 30,000 square feet in area. The maximum permitted density in the R4 zone classification is 6 dwelling units per acre, utilizing density incentives or transferred development rights. 6. King County's "Transfer of Development Rights (TDR)" program is governed by Chapter 21A.37 of the King County Code. The TDR program establishes a property right which is separable from the fee-simple title to certain lands within King County, and provides a method for the transfer and utilization of that new right, which is colloquially known as a development right or "density credit." A density credit has a substantial market value. The underlying purpose of the TDR program is to allow for the movement of residential density from rural areas to urban areas of King County. The code is intended to provide, " ... an efficient and streamlined administrative review system to ensure that transfers of development rights to L03P0006/L03TY 403-Liberty Grove 4 receiving sites are evaluated in a timely way and balanced with other County goals and policies, and are adjusted to the specific conditions of each receiving site." KCC 2 lA.37 .0 I 0.2. Receiving sites are required to meet the provisions ofKCC 21A.37.030. Those requirements are that the receiving site: 1. be within an unincorporated urban area, zoned R-4 or higher, or be within a potential annexation area; 2. be within a city where new growth is or will be encouraged, and where facilities and services exist or public investments in facilities and services will be made; or 3. be within RA-2.5 and RA-5 zoned parcels, subject to stringent criteria. The subject property is within the first category of eligible receiving sites listed in KCC 21A.37.030. Sites within the unincorporated urban growth area are not required to have any specific level of available facilities and services. Development approvals that utilize density credits must meet only those service criteria that apply generally to development of the number of dwelling units proposed on the site. King County Code chapter 21A.12 governs densities and development standards in residential zones. The R-4 zone in the urban residential area allows for a maximum density of six dwelling units per acre, which may be achieved only through the application ofresidential density incentives or transfers of development rights. KCC 21A.12.030.A. and B.I. When density credits are used, development shall comply with dimensional standards of the zone having a base density most comparable to the total approved density. KCC 21A.37.030.B. 7. The foregoing provisions of the King County Zoning Code are generally consistent with policies of the King County Comprehensive Plan governing residential land use. In particular, the Zoning Code provisions are generally consistent with: Policy U-113, that new residential development in the Urban Growth Area should occur where facilities and services can be provided at the lowest public cost and in a timely fashion; Policy U-114, that the County seek to achieve an average zoning density ofat least seven to eight homes per acre in the Urban Growth Area through a mix of densities, allowing for lower density zones to recognize existing subdivisions with little or no opportunity for infill or redevelopment; Policy U-122 that supports increases in urban density through a rezone or a proposal to utilize density transfer, when the proposal will help resolve traffic, utility, parks or open space deficiencies in the immediate neighborhood. This proposal will improve traffic circulation in the area, will extend sewer service further into the urban area, and will provide recreation facilities and open space available to future residents on the subject property. 8. The subject property is in the City ofRenton's potential annexation area. The City is considering modifications to its comprehensive plan that would limit density on this property to a maximum L03P0006/L03TY 403-Libcrty Grove of 4 dwelling units per acre. However, those plan changes were not in effect at the time a complete application for this subdivision was submitted. 5 9. ODES and the Applicant have agreed upon right-of-way dedications and road improvements to mitigate the impact of traffic which this proposal will generate adjacent to and in the immediate vicinity of the proposed development. The dedications and improvements include additional right-of-way and construction that will open and improve the north side of Southeast 136th Street, from 160th Avenue Southeast to 158th Avenue Southeast. This dedication and improvement will be matched on the south side of 136th Street by dedication and improvements to be constructed by the plat ofEvendell. Additional improvements that will be made to Southeast 136th Street from 158th Avenue Southeast to 156th Avenue Southeast will result in a new east-west route from 160th Avenue Southeast to 156th Avenue Southeast. This new route will divert traffic from the high accident intersection of Southeast I 28th Street and 160th Avenue Southeast. The subject plat will also provide improvements to the west side of 160th Avenue Southeast along the plat frontage, to the urban neighborhood collector standard. These improvements will include a sidewalk from the north property line to Southeast 136"' Street. I 0. The Issaquah School District plans to operate a school bus stop for elementary school children at the intersection of Southeast 136th Street and 160th Avenue Southeast. The internal road improvements and frontage improvements on 160th A venue Southeast will provide a safe route for children to use between the lots of this subdivision and that bus stop. 11. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location oflots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. a. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual and applicable updates adopted by King County. ODES approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. b. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by DOES Engineering Review, shall be shown on the engineering plans. c. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: "All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings# on file with DOES and/or the King County Department of Transportation. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots that are designated for individual lot infiltration systems, the systems shall be constructed at the time of the building permit and shall comply with plans on file." L03P0006/L03TY 403~Liberty Grove d. The stormwater detention design shall comply with the Level 2 or Level 3 Flow Control requirements, as applicable, per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). (See SEPA conditions in condition no. 19.) e. The storm water control facility shall be located in a separate tract and dedicated to King County unless portions of the drainage tract are used for required recreation space in accordance with KCC 21A.14.180. 6 12. A surface water drainage adjustment (no. L03V0065) has been approved for this proposal and the Liberty Grove Contiguous proposal (no. L03P0005). Stormwater detention for the subject property will be provided on the Liberty Grove Contiguous property site that lies on the south side of Southeast 136th Street and east side of 160th Avenue Southeast. The level 3 flow control standard is required as a condition of the drainage adjustment for discharge from the surface water detention facilities. In addition, some downstream surface water conveyance improvements have been made by King County, and others are required to be made by this and other developments that are being proposed and constructed in this area. The downstream analysis and required improvements assure adequate conveyance of surface water for a distance greater than V. mile from this plat. The level 3 flow control standard protects downstream properties from damage from surface water discharge from this development. CONCLUSIONS: 1. If approved subject to the conditions recommended below, the proposed subdivision will comply with the goals and objectives of the King County Comprehensive Plan, subdivision and zoning codes, and other official land use controls and policies of King County. 2. If approved subject to the conditions recommended below, this proposed subdivision will make appropriate provision for the public health, safety and general welfare and for open spaces for drainage ways, streets, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supply, sanitary waste, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds and safe walking conditions for students who only walk to school; and it will serve the public use and interest. 3. The conditions for final plat approval recommended below are in the public interest and are reasonable requirements to mitigate the impacts of the development upon the environment. 4. The dedications of land or easements within and adjacent to the proposed plat, as required for final plat approval or as shown on the proposed preliminary plat submitted by the Applicant on September 3, 2003, are reasonable and necessary as a direct result of the development of this proposed plat, and are proportionate to the impacts of the development. 5. The Applicant has negotiated for the purchase of development rights that would allow for an increase in the number oflots to be developed on the subject property to a total of 24. The development of24 lots on the subject property will be within the maximum density of6 dwelling units per acre permitted in the R4 zone classification in the urban area, although it will be most comparable to the base density of the R6 zone classification. The proposed development of the subject property, utilizing up to 5 density rights, is consistent with all applicable development standards and other provisions of the king county code. Provisions of the City of Renton L03P0006/L03TY403~LibertyGrove Comprehensive Plan concerning density of development on this property are not applicable to this proposal. 7 6. The road improvements proposed and agreed to by the Applicant, including those shown on the September 3, 2003 preliminary plat and set forth in the conditions below, will reasonably mitigate the impacts of traffic generated by the proposed development. 7. Safe walking conditions for children who walk to school from the subject property will be provided by using one of the alternatives for improvements incorporated into this proposal and set forth in condition no. 22 below. 8. The conditions of approval of the surface water drainage adjustment L03V0065, and the conditions recommended by DDES and agreed to by the Applicant, incorporated into the conditions below, mitigate the impacts of surface water drainage from this proposed development. DECISION: The proposed preliminary plat of Liberty Grove, as revised and received September 3, 2003, utilizing up to 5 density credits (transferable density rights), is APPROVED, subject to the following conditions of final plat approval: I. a. Compliance with all platting provisions of Title 19 of the King County Code. b. Prior to the recording of Liberty Grove, the plat of Liberty Grove Contiguous shall be recorded (as drainage facilities for Liberty Grove will be constructed off-site in the plat of Liberty Grove Contiguous). 2. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final plat a dedication which includes the language set forth in King County Council Motion No. 5952. 3. a. The plat shall comply with the maximum density (and minimum density) requirements of the R-4 zone classification. All lots shall meet the minimum dimensional requirements of the R-6 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary plat, whichever is larger, except that minor revisions to the plat which do not result in substantial changes may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services. b. The Applicant shall provide Transfer of Density Credit documentation to DDES prior to final approval to allow transfer of a maximum of five density credits. 4. The applicant must obtain final approval from the King County Health Department for abandonment of existing septic systems on-site serving on and off-site homes. 5. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the King County Road Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No. 11187, as amended (1993 KCRS). L03P0006/L03TY403-Liberty Grove 6. The applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main, and fire flow standards of Chapter 17 .08 of the King County Code. 8 7. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location oflots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. a. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual and applicable updates adopted by King County. DOES approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. b. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by DOES Engineering Review, shall be shown on the engineering plans. c. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings# on file with DOES and/or the King County Department of Transportation. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots that are designated for individual lot infiltration systems, the systems shall be constructed at the time of the building permit and shall comply with plans on file." d. The storm water control facility shall be located in a separate tract and dedicated to King County unless portions of the drainage tract are used for required recreation space in accordance with KCC 21A.14.180. 8. A drainage adjustment (L03V0065) is approved for this site and for the Liberty Grove Contiguous site (L03P0005). The adjustment allows combining the storm water from both subdivisions on the Liberty Grove Contiguous site; and routing post developed flows to 160"' Ave SE. A flow splitter is proposed to maintain existing flows to the south. All conditions of approval for this adjustment shall be met prior to engineering plan approval. A Conceptual Drainage Plan showing the preliminary configuration was received March 11, 2003. 9. The stormwater detention facility shall be designed to the Level 3 flow control standard in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual(KCSWDM). The facility shall also be designed to meet the basic water quality menu. 10. The downstream drainage system along the east side of 160"' Ave SE from the south plat boundary of Liberty Grove Contiguous to approximately 50 feet south of the culvert 29 (House# 14028); shall be improved to achieve adequate drainage capacity per the 1998 KCSWDM. Culvert 29 is approximately 900 feet south of the southwest corner of the LCG site and is shown L03P0006/L03TY 403~Liberty Grove in the Level I Offsite Analysis received September 3, 2003. Plans and supporting capacity analysis for this improvement shall be submitted with the engineering plans. 11. The I 00-year floodplain for any on-site wetlands or streams shall be shown on the engineering plans and the final plat per Special Requirement #2 of the KCSWDM. 12. The following road improvements are required to be constructed according to the 1993 King County Road Standards(KCRS): a. SE 135'' PL shall be improved to the urban subaccess street standard. b. FRONTAGE: The frontage along 160'' Ave SE shall be improved to the urban neighborhood collector standard(west side only). 9 c. FRONTAGE: The frontage along SE 136" ST may be improved to the urban standards per the SEP A mitigation list. d. Tract A shall be improved as a private access tract according to Section 2.09 of the KCRS. The tract shall be owned and maintained by the owners of those Lots being served. Tracts C and D shall each be improved as a joint use driveway per Section 3.01 of the KCRS. The tracts shall be owned and maintained by the owners of those Lots being served. e. A R/W radius shall be dedicated at the northeast quadrant of 158" Ave SE and SE 136th St. (southwest comer of Lot 16), and a second radius shall be dedicated at the northwest quadrant of 160" Ave SE and SE 136th St. (southeast comer of Lot 24). f. Modifications to the above road conditions may be considered according to the variance provisions in Section 1.08 of the KCRS. 13. All utilities within proposed rights-of-way must be included within a franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final plat recording. 14. The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by the applicable fee ordinance. The applicant has the option to either: (1) pay the MPS fee at final plat recording, or (2) pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the plat that reads, "All fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), have been paid." If the second option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of building permit application. 15. The proposed subdivision shall comply with the Sensitive Areas Code as outlined in KCC 21A.24. Preliminary plat review has identified the following specific requirements that apply to this project. All other applicable requirements from KCC 21 A.24 shall also be addressed by the applicant: L03P0006/L03TY403-Liberty Grove 10 Southeast 1361h Street to the south of the project site may or may not be improved prior to beginning construction on Liberty Grove. If road improvements are made or are in the process of being constructed, then no wetland conditions shall apply. If however the improvements are not made or are not under construction, then the extent of the buffer/wetland area shall be shown on the Plat of Liberty Grove and a Sensitive Areas Tract is required for the protection of the Class II buffer/wetland area for the wetland identified on the Plat of Evendell. 16. The following note shall be shown on the final engineering plan and recorded plat, if wetland buffer is necessary per condition 15 above: RESTRICTIONS FOR SENSITIVE AREA TRACTS AND SENSITIVE AREAS AND BUFFERS Dedication of a sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the tract/sensitive area and buffer. This interest includes the preservation of native vegetation for all purposes that benefit the public health, safety and welfare, including control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the land subject to the tract/sensitive area and buffer the obligation, enforceable on behalf of the public by King County, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the tract/sensitive area and buffer. The vegetation within the tract/sensitive area and buffer may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged without approval in writing from the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services or its successor agency, unless otherwise provided by Jaw. The common boundary between the tract/sensitive area and buffer and the area of development activity must be marked or otherwise flagged to the satisfaction of King County prior to any clearing, grading, building construction or other development activity on a lot subject to the sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer. The required marking or flagging shall remain in place until all development proposal activities in the vicinity of the sensitive area are completed. No building foundations are allowed beyond the required 15-foot building setback line, unless otherwise provided by law. 17. Suitable recreation space shall be provided consistent with the requirements KCC 2 IA.14.180 and KCC 21A.14. l 90 in providing sport court[s], children's play equipment, picnic table[s], benches, etc. a. A detailed recreation space plan (i.e., landscape specs, equipment specs, etc.) shall be submitted for review and approval by DDES and King County Parks prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the engineering plans. This plan shall comply with Ordinance# 14045. b. A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording of the plat. L03P0006/L03TY403-Liberty Grove l l 18. A homeowners' association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction ofDDES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the recreation, open space and/or sensitive area tract(s). 19. Street trees shall be included in the design of all road improvements, and shall comply with Section 5.03 of the KCRS and KCC 21A.l6.050: a. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. b. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. c. If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. d. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the County has adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. e. The species of trees shall be approved by DDES iflocated within the right-of-way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. f. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by DDES prior to engineering plan approval. g. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DDES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. A landscape inspection fee shall also be submitted prior to plat recording. The inspection fee is subject to change based on current County fees. 20. The following have been established by SEP A as necessary requirements to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of this development. The applicants shall demonstrate compliance with these items prior to final approval. L03P0006/L03TY403~LibertyGrove Individually, or joint with other area developers, the Applicant shall design and construct improvements to Southeast I 28th Street at 160th Ave. SE to mitigate project impacts at the High Accident Location. Or, the Applicant shall reduce the project impacts at the High Accident Location by completing the remainder of the improvements to Southeast 136th Street (i.e. additional paving, concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks), between 158th Avenue SE and 160th Avenue SE, and, revise the channelization at the intersection of 156th Avenue SE/SE 136th Street to provide a southbound left turn lane. School Mitigation Fees 12 21. Lots within this subdivision are subject to King County Code 21A.43, which imposes impact fees to fund school system improvements needed to serve new development. As a condition of final approval, fifty percent (50%) of the impact fees due for the plat shall be assessed and collected immediately prior to recording, using the fee schedules in effect when the plat receives final approval. The balance of the assessed fee shall be allocated evenly to the dwelling units in the plat and shall be collected prior to building permit issuance. School Walkways 22. The Applicant, individually or in conjunction with other developers, shall construct an off-site walkway to Liberty High school from the site. The walkway shall be constructed within the right-of-way from 160th Ave SE, east along SE 135th Street to 166th Ave SE, and south to Liberty High School at SE 136th Street, or via alternative right-of-way and easements that become available and are approved by ODES. One acceptable alternative would be to use future right-of-way of Southeast 136th Street and 162nd Avenue Southeast to connect with the sidewalk improvement of"five lot subdivision," and through the plat of"five lot subdivision"/LOOP0023 to the southwest gate of Liberty High School. The walkway shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the 1993 King County Road Standards and shown on the engineering plans for ODES review and approval. Any surfacing alternative from the King County Road Standards (KCRS 3.09) may be submitted for approval through a road variance application. ORDERED this 23rd day of February, 2004. TRANSMITTED this 23rd day of February, 200 , to the parties and interested persons of record: William J. Bowen Bowen Revocable Living Trust 13644 -160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Wilma J. Bowen 13644-160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Marshall Brenden 18225 SE 128th Renton WA 98059 L03P0006/L03TY 403-Liberty Grove Carolyn Ann Buckett 16524 SE 145th SI. Renton WA 98059 Kathy Graves 13020 -160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Victor & Gwendolyn High 13405 -158th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Don & Diane Kezele 15657 SE 137th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Leroy Nass 15713 SE 128th St. Renton WA 98059 Larry & Susan Oard 16013 SE 136th St. Renton WA 98059 Resident 13020-160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Deborah Stewart 16207 SE 136th St. Renton WA 98059 Mr. & Mrs. Bob Wilmot 13900 -1601h Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Greg Borba DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 Kristen Langley DDES/LUSD Land Use Traffic MS OAK-DE-0100 Steve Townsend DDESILUSD land Use Inspections MS OAK-DE-0100 Thomas Carlyle PO Box 581 Tacoma WA 98401 Brad & Julie Herrin 16202 SE 137th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Wayne Jones Lakeridge Development Inc. PO Box 146 Renton WA 98057 Milton & Helen Lee P.O. Box 2574 Renton WA 98056 Kathy Nelson Transportation Dept. 805 -2nd Ave. S. Issaquah WA 98027 David & Georgia Platt 510 Panoramic Dr. Camano Island WA 98282 Mike Romano Centurion Development Services 22617 8th Drive SE Bothell WA 98021 Jesse Thatcher 13817 -162nd Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Kevin M. Wyman 16540 SE 149th SI. Renton WA 98059 Kim Claussen DDES/LUSD Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 Carol Rogers DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 Larry West DDES/LUSD Geo Review MS OAK-DE-0100 Melvin L. Daley DMP, INC 726 Auburn Way N Auburn WA 98002 Gwendolyn High P.O. Box 2936 Renton WA 98056 Edward June & Kris Hill 13527 156th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Rebecca Lind City of Renton, EDNSP 1055 S. Grady Way Renton WA 98058 Richard & Anita Oliphant 16519 SE 145th St. Renton WA 98059 Guy Platz 13535 • 160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Seattle KC Health Dept. E. Dist. Environ. Health 14350 SE Eastgate Way Bellevue WA 98007 Mike Tull 16056 SE 136th St. Renton WA 98059 Gregg Zimmerman City of Renton-Planning 1055 S Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Nick Gillen DDES/LUSD Site Development Services MS OAK-DE-0100 Karen Scharer DDES/LUSD Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 Bruce Whittaker DDES/LUSD Prel. Review Engineer MS OAK-DE-0100 13 L03P0006/L03TY403-Liberty Grove 14 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL In order to appeal the decision of the Examiner, written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the King County Council with a fee of$250.00 (check payable to King County Office of Finance) on or before March 8, 2004. If a notice of appeal is filed, the original and six ( 6) copies of a written appeal statement specifying the basis for the appeal and argument in support of the appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the King County Council on or before March 15, 2004. Appeal statements may refer only to facts contained in the hearing record; new facts may not be presented on appeal. Filing requires actual delivery to the Office of the Clerk of the Council, Room I 025, King County Courthouse, 516 3«l Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104, prior to the close of business (4:30 p.m.) on the date due. Prior mailing is not sufficient if actual receipt by the Clerk does not occur within the applicable time period. The Examiner does not have authority to extend the time period unless the Office of the Clerk is not open on the specified closing date, in which event delivery prior to the close of business on the next business day is sufficient to meet the filing requirement. If a written notice of appeal and filing fee are not filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date of this report, or if a written appeal statement and argument are not filed within twenty-one (21) calendar days of the date of this report, the decision of the hearing examiner contained herein shall be the final decision of King County without the need for further action by the Council. MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY I 0, 2004, PUBLIC HEARING ON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FILE NOS. L03P0005/LIBERTY GROVE CONTIGUOUS (LGC) AND L03P0006/L03TY403/LIBERTY GROVE (LG). James N. O'Connor was the Hearing Examiner in this matter. Participating in the hearing were Karen Scharer, Bruce Whittaker, Nick Gillen and Kristen Langley, representing the Department; Wayne Jones and Dave Casey, representing the Appellant; Gwendolyn High, Intervenor for C.A.R.E. and Anita Oliphant, Kristy Hill, Mary Brotherton, Diane Kezele, Rhonda Bryant, and Joann Lee. The following exhibits were offered and entered into the record: Exhibit No. I Exhibit No. 2 Exhibit No. 3 Exhibit No. 4 LGC -DOES File L03P0005 LG -DOES File L03P0006 LGC-DOES Preliminary Report for L03P0005, Prepared January 26, 2004 with attachments as follows: 3.1 36 Lot Plat Design 3.2 Density Calculations R-4 w/4 TDRs 3 .3 Issaquah School District 3.4 Certificate of Water Availability dated January 8, 2003 3.5 City of Renton Letters, including the Sewer Certificate 3.6 Certificate of Transportation Concurrency LG -ODES Preliminary Report for L03P0006, Prepared January 26, 2004 with attachments as follows: 4.1 24 Lot Plat Design 4.2 Density Calculations R-4 w/5 TDRs L03P0006/L03TY 403~Libcrty Grove Exhibit No. 5 Exhibit No. 6 Exhibit No. 7 Exhibit No. 8 Exhibit No. 9 Exhibit No. I 0 Exhibit No. 11 Exhibit No. 12 Exhibit No. 13 Exhibit No. 14 Exhibit No. 15 Exhibit No. 16 Exhibit No. 17 Exhibit No. 18 Exhibit No. 19 Exhibit No. 20 Exhibit No. 21 Exhibit No. 22 Exhibit No. 23 Exhibit No. 24 Exhibit No. 25 Exhibit No. 26 Exhibit No. 27 Exhibit No. 28 Exhibit No. 29 Exhibit No. 30 Exhibit No. 31 Exhibit No. 32 4.3 Issaquah School District 4.4 Certificate of Water Availability dated January 8, 2003 4.5 City of Renton Letters, including Sewer Certificate 4.6 Certificate of Transportation Concurrency Corrections/Revisions of Conditions to ODES Preliminary Reports (Conditions 7.d. & 12.d) dated February 9, 2004 -Not Entered into the Record LGC -Application for Land Use Permit/Plat L03P0005 Received March 11, 2003 LG -Application for Land Use Permit/Pit L03P0006 received March 11, 2003 LGC -Revised Environmental Checklist Received September 3, 2003 LG -Revised Environmental Checklist Received September 3, 2003 LGC -Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance dated December 16, 2003 LG -Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance dated December 16, 2003 LGC -Affidavit of Revised Posting Indicating Posting Date of June 2, 2003 And received June 3, 2003 LG-Affidavit of Posting Indicating Posting Date of June 2, 2003 and received June 3, 2003 LGC-Revised Site Plan (36 Lot Preliminary Plat Map) received September 3, 2003 LG-Revised Site Plan (24 Lot Preliminary Plat Map) received September 3, 2003 Assessors Maps (2) SE 14-23-05 Revised February 3, 2000 & NE 14-23-05 Revised February 28, 2000 Letter w/attachments to DOES from Wayne Jones; Re: Intent to sell TOR-Density Credits dated April 23, 2003 Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Gary A. Norris ofDN Traffic Consultants dated February 7, 2003 and received March 11, 2003 Revised Traffic Impact Analysis prepared hy Gary A. Norris ofDN Traffic Consultants dated June 24, 2003 and received September 3, 2003 Walkway Study Prepared by DMP, Inc. dated August 18, 2003 LGC-Walkway Study Map Annotated by DOES prepared February 9, 2004 March I 0, 2003 email from Issaquah School District to Ted Cooper regarding School walkways to Liberty High, Maywood Middle and Briarwood Elementary School for plat conditions ofLOOP0023 Level One Off-Site Analysis prepared by Daley-Morrow-Poblete, Inc. dated March 3, 2003 Revised Level One Off-Site Analysis prepared by Daley-Morrow-Poblete, Inc. Dated July 11, 2003 Conceptual Drainage Plan received March 11, 2003 Additional Downstream Information received November 25, 2003 LG-Letter to Wayne Jones and Mel Daley from James Sanders and Jim Chan Dated December 4, 2003 regarding drainage adjustment (L03V0065) Wetland Evaluation and Delineation Report and Wildlife Habitat Evaluation By Habitat Technologies dated November 5, 2002 LGC-Letter to Wayne Jones from Mark Heckert ofH&S Consulting dated July 18, 2003; Addendum to the Wetland Evaluation and Delineation Report LGC -Tributary Area Map Annotations by ODES; Prepared February 2004 Letter to Karen Scharer from Anita & Richard Oliphant dated January 29, 2004 Requesting comments to LOIP0016 & L03RE038 be considered in this matter Letter to Karen Scharer from Steven & Joann Lee dated February 2, 2004 Regarding claim of adverse possession along south property line of LGC 15 L03P0006/L03TY403-Liberty Grove Exhibit No. 33 Hearing Examiner Report & Decision for Evendell/LOIPOOl6/L03RE038 Issued February 4, 2004 Exhibit No. 34 Email from Shirley Day to Karen Scharer dated February 3, 2004 Exhibit No. 35 Email from Glenda Johnson to Karen Scharer dated February 10, 2004 Exhibit No. 36 Letter from Bill & Dona Mokin to Karen Scharer dated February 7, 2004 Exhibit No. 37 Photograph of driveway located at SE 136th/160 1h on February 4, 2004 Exhibit No. 38 C.A.R.E. Response: Liberty Grove/Liberty Grove Contiguous Plat Applications L03P0006&L03P0005 Exhibit No. 39 C.A.R.E. Households List Exhibit No. 40 Community Map Exhibit No. 41 March and April 2000 Press Releases from King County Executive Ron Sims Exhibit No. 42 King County Metro Six Year Transit Development Plan, February 2002 Exhibit No. 43 Report of the King County General Government Budget Advisory Task Force To County Executive Ron Sims dated June 25, 2003 Exhibit No. 44 A Joint City Position -The Cities' Suggestions for Inclusion in the King County Budget Advisory Task Force's Recommendations dated March 12, 2003 Exhibit No. 45 Message to Employees from King County Executive Ron Sims; General Budget Advisory Task Force Recommendations dated July 9, 2003 Exhibit No. 46 King County Council Budget & Fiscal Management Committee Capital Budget Plan, 2004 CIP Overview Exhibit No. 47 In Transportation -Facing the Budget's Challenges from Harold Taniguchi Dated November 3, 2003 Exhibit No. 48 High Accident Locations Report dated July 2003 Exhibit No. 49 Transportation Service Areas 2000 Exhibit No. 50 King County Concurrency Maps 200 I, 2002 and 2003 Exhibit No. 51 Transportation Concurrency Detail Comparison Graphic Exhibit No. 52 City of Renton Long Range Wastewater Management Plan (Excerpts) Exhibit No. 53 2003 King County Annual Growth Report Exhibit No. 54 King County Benchmark Report-2003 (Land use -excerpts) Exhibit No. 55 Buildable Lands Report -Dated August 29, 2002 (Excerpts) Exhibit No. 56 State, County, City Populations Exhibit No. 57 City of Renton Economic Development, Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning Department Reports (June 3, 2003; September 23, 2003; October 1, 2003; October 10, 2003) Exhibit No. 58 Renton Planning Commission Recommendation dated October 22, 2003 Exhibit No. 59 City of Renton Ordinance No. 5026 Exhibit No. 60 Renton City Council Meeting Minutes dated November 24, 2003 Exhibit No. 61 C.A.R.E. Member's Letters Detailing Adverse Impacts from High Density Development in this Community Exhibit No. 62 City of Renton Proposed Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Exhibit No. 63 Two Photographs oflntersection Exhibit No. 64 Two Photographs of SE 144th/62"• Ave. SE Exhibit No. 65 List oflndividuals and Their Addresses in Attendance Exhibit No. 66 Letter to Karen Scharer from Claude R. & Eloise M. Stachowiak Dated November 16, 2003 16 L03P0006/L03TY 403-Liberty Grove Exhibit No. 67 Letter to the Hearing Examiner from Kristy J. Hill dated February 10, 2004 Exhibit No. 68 Letter to the Hearing Examiner from Edward & June Hill dated February 10, 2004 JOC:gao L03 P0006/L03 TY 403 RPT 17 ® TO: FAX NO.: PHONE NO.: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Fax No. 206-296-6613 or 206-296-7051 FAX COVER SHEET Ginger/ Marka 206-296-1654 206-296-4660 Total numbers of pages including this cover sheet: Date: ;/d-'I Time: 9.'3t2d-/H.. From: Carol Rogers Sender's Name Phone: 206-296-7116 Sender's Phone Permit Name/Number: L03P0005/L03TY401, LIBERTY GROVE CONITUGOUS SUBDIVISION AND REZONE - L03P0006/L03TY403 -LIBERTY GROVE SUBDIVISION AND REZONE Parties of Record list. applicant name & address. property location. COMMENTS: Hearing date is set for February 10. 2004. SEPA appeal period will end on 01/09/04. ExaminerFaxCover.doc MAIN FILE COPY (V BORBA,GREG CURRENT PLANNI:--JG SUPERVISOR DOES /LUSD MS, OAK -DE-0100 BOWEN, WILLIAM J. BOWEN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 13644160THAVESE RENTON, WA 98055 BOWEN, WILMA J. 13644 160TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 BRENDEN, MARSHALL 18225 SE 128TH RENTON, WA 98059-8732 CLAUSSEN, KIM SR.PLANNER DDES/LUSD MS: OAK-DE-0100 DMP lNC. MEL DALEY 726 AUBURN WAY NORTH AUBURN, WA 98002 GILLEN, NICK WETLAND REVIEW ODES/ LUSD MS: OAK -DE-0 JOO GRAVES, KA THY 13020 \60THAVESE RENTON, WA 98059 HERRIN, BRAD & JULIE 16202 SE 137TH PL RENTON, WA 98059 LOJPOOOS L03POOOS LOJP0005 LOJP0005 L03P0005 L03P0005 L03P0005 LOJPOOOS LOJP0005 HIGH, GWENDOLYN 13405 158TH A VE SE RENTON, WA 98059 HIGH, MS. GWEKDOLYN PO BOX 2936 RENTON, WA 98056 KC HEARING EXAMINER'S OFFICE ATTN, OFFICE STAFF LOJPOOOS/06 LIBERTY GROVE MS, YES. CC • 0404 LAKERIDGE DEVELOPMENT fNC WAYNE JONES PO BOX 146 RENTON, WA 98057 LANGLEY, KRIS LAND USE TRAFFIC REVIEW DOES ILUSD MS, OAK -DE-0100 LEE, MIL TON & HELEN PO BOX 2574 RENTON, WA 98056 LIND, REBECCA CITY OF RENTOK EDNSP DEPT 1055S.GRADYWAY RENTON, WA 98055 :-JASS, LEROY 15713 SE 128TH ST. RENTON. WA 98059 OORD, LARRY & SUSAN 16013 SE 136TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 LOJPOOOS L03P0005 L03P0005 L03P0005 L03POOOl L03POOOl L03POOOl L03P0005 L03P0005 PLATT. LJAVILJ & GEORGIA 51() E. PANORAMIC DRIVE CA:\1ANO lSLAN"D, WA 98282 PLATZ,GUY 13535 160TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 RESIDENT 13020 160TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 ROGERS, CAROL CURRENT PLANNING SECTION DOES/ LUSD MS: OAK-DE-0100 SCHARER, KAREN PROJECT PLANNER DDESILUSD MS, OAK-DE-0100 SEATTLE KC HEAL TH DEPT. E. DIST. ENVIRON. HEAL TH 14350 SE EASTGATE WAY BELLEVUE, WA 98007 STEWART, DEBORAH J. l62U7 SE 136TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 THATCHER. JESSE 13817 162ND AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 TOW:-.iSENLJ. STEVE LAr-..·o USE INSPECTIONS DDES/LUSD MS, OAK-DE-0100 LOJPOOOS L03P0005 L03P0005 LOJP0005 L03P0005 L03P0D05 L03P0005 L03P0005 L03POOD5 TCLL, ~llKE 16056 SE 136TH ST RENTON, WA 98059 WEST, LARRY DOES /LUSD GEO REVIEW MS: OAK-DE-0100 WHITTAKER, BRUCE PRELIMINARY REVlEW EJ\GL'../EER DOES/ LUSD MS, OAK -DE-0100 WILMOT, BOB & LYNN 13900 160TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 WYMAN, KEVIN M. 16540 SE 149TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 ZIMMERMAN, GREGG CITY OF RENTON PLANNING 1055 SOUTII GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98055 L03P0005 LD3P0005 L03P0005 L03P0005 L03P0005 LD3P0005 "'SEF. LOJP0005 FOR COMPLETE POR UST0 LOJP0006 'SEE LOJP0005 FOR COMPLETE POR LIST' BORBA,GREG CURRENT PLANNING SUPERVISOR DDES/LUSD MS, OAK -DE-0100 BOWEN, WILLIAM J. DOWEN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 13644 160TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98055 CLAUSSEN, KIM SR. PLANNER ODES/ LUSD MS, OAK -DE-0100 DMP ENGINEERING INC MEL DALEY 726 AUBURN WAY NORTH AUBURN, WA 98002 GILLEN, NICK DDES/LUSD WETLAND REVIEW MS, OAK-DE -0100 LAKERIDGE DEVELOPMENT INC. WAYNE JONES PO BOX 146 RENTON, WA 98057 LANGLEY, KRIS LAND USE TRAFFIC REVIEW DDES/LUSD MS: OAK -DE-0100 PLATT, DA YID & GEORGIA 510 E. PANORAMIC DRIVE CAMANO ISLAND, WA 98282 L03TY401 LOJTY4{H LOJTY401 LOJTY401 LOJTY401 LOJTY401 L03TY4Dl LOJTY401 L03TY401 PLATZ, GUY 13535 160TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 ROGERS, CAROL CURRENT PLANNING SECTION DDES /LUSD MS, OAK-DE-0100 SCHARER, KAREN PROJECT PLANNER DDES/LUSD MS, OAK -DE-0100 WEST,LARRY DOES/ LUSD GEO REV[EW MS, OAK -DE-0 I 00 WHITTAKER, BRUCE REVIEW ENGINEER ODES/ LUSD MS: OAK -DE-0100 L03TY401 LOJTY401 LOJTY401 LOJTY40L LOJTY401 ® Deparunent of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Divi'iion Notice e,. Hearing, Recommendation & SEPA Decision 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (SEPA Threshold Determination, Type 3 & 4) File No.: L03TY401 & L03P0005 Project Name: Liberty Grove Contiguous DOES Project Manager: Karen J. Scharer (206) 296-7114 or e-mail karen.scharer@metrokc.gov Applicant: Project Location: Project Description: Permits Requested: SEPA Threshold Wayne Jones Lakeridge Development PO Box 146, Renton, WA 98057 (425) 228-9750 The site is located south of SE 1361 • Street, between 1601 • Ave. SE and 1621• Avenue Southeast Proposed is Rezone from R-4 to R-6 and subdivision of the site into 36 lots for detached single family residences and tracts for sensitive areas, recreation and drainage facilities. The applicant proposes to use 4 density credit transfers to plat the 36 lots if the rezone is denied. Rezontc and Subdivision Determination: Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MONS) issued December 16, 2003 Department Recommendation to the Hearing Examiner: Deny Reclassification and Approve the Subdivision subject to conditions Public Hearing Date: February 10, 2004 at 9:30 A.M. Location of Public Hearing: DOES, Hearing Room -first floor 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Comment/Appeal Procedure: Comments on this SEPA determination are welcome. This SEPA determination may also be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner. A notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) Land Use Services Division (LUSD) at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on January 9, 2004, and be accompanied with a filing fee of $250.00 payable to King County Office of Finance. If a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall also file a Statement of Appeal with DDES/LUSD at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on January 9, 2004. The Statement of Appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including the file number) and the alleged errors in that decision. Further, the Statement of Appeal shall state: I) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the Statement of Appeal. Failure to timely file a Notice of Appeal, appeal fee or Statement of Appeal, deprives the Hearing Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Appeals must be submitted to ODES. ODES will issue a written report and recommendation to the Hearing Examiner two weeks prior to the public hearing. Persons wishing to receive a copy should contact DDES/LUSD. Following the close of the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner will issue a written recommendation for the rezone and a decision for the plat which may be appealed to the Metropolitan-King County Council. Appeal procedures will be stated in the Examiner's written recommendation and decision. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact DDES/LUSD at the address and/or telephone number listed. Written comments may also be submitted to ODES. A public hearing as required by law will be held to consider the approval of this application. If the Renton School District announces a district-wide school closure due to adverse weather conditions or similar area emergency, the public hearing on this matter will be postponed. Interested parties will be notified of the time and date of the rescheduled hearing. Any questions regarding postponements and rescheduling can be directed to the Hearing Examiner's Office at (206) 296-4660. DDES--Land Use Services Division Attn: Permit Center 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 December 16, 2003 Date Mailed If you have any questions regarding the appeal procedures, please contact the planner at the phone number listed above. If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, call (206) 296-6600 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (TTY). ® Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Divio;ion 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Notice of Hearing, Recommendation & SEPA Decision (SEPA Threshold Determination, Type 3&4) File No.: L03TY403 & L03P0006 Project Name: . Liberty Grove DOES Project Manager: Karen J. Scharer 206-296-7114 or e-mail karen.scharer@metrokc.gov Applicant: Wayne Jones Lakeridge Development PO Box 146, Renton, WA 98057 ( 425) 228-9750 Project Location: The site is located north of SE 136 1 • Street, between 158'" Ave. SE and 160'" A venue Southeast Project Description: Proposed is Rezone from R-4 to R-6 and subdivision of the site into 24 lots for detached single family residences and tracts for sensitive areas, recreation and drainage facilities. The applicant proposes to use 5 density credit transfers to plat the 24 lots if the rezone is denied. Permits Requested: Rezone and Subdivision SEPA Threshold Determination: Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) issued December 16, 2003 Department Recommendation to the Hearing Examiner: Deny Reclassification and Approve the Subdivision subject to conditions Public Hearing Date: February 10, 2004 at 9:30 A.M. Location of Public Hearing: DDES, Hearing Room -first floor 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Comment/Appeal Procedure: Comments on this SEPA determination are welcome. This SEPA determination may also be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner. A notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) Land Use Services Division (LUSD) at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on January 9, 2004, and be accompanied with a filing fee of $250.00 payable to King County Office of Finance. If a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall also file a Statement of Appeal with DDES/LUSD at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on January 9, 2004. The Statement of Appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including the file number) and the alleged errors in that decision. Further, the Statement of Appeal shall state: 1) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the Statement of Appeal. Failure to timely file a Notice of Appeal, appeal fee or Statement of Appeal, deprives the Hearing Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Appeals must be submitted to DDES. DOES will issue a written report and recommendation to the Hearing Examiner two weeks prior to the public hearing. Persons wishing to receive a copy should contact DDES/LUSD. Following the close of the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner will issue a written recommendation for the rezone and a decision for the plat which may be appealed to the Metropolitan-King County Council. Appeal procedures will be stated in the Examiner's written recommendation and decision. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact DDES/LUSD at the address and/or telephone number listed. Written comments may also be submitted to DDES. A public hearing as required by law will be held to consider the approval of this application. If the Renton School District announces a district-wide school closure due to adverse weather conditions or similar area emergency, the public hearing on this matter will be postponed. Interested parties will be notified of the time and date of the rescheduled hearing. Any questions regarding postponements and rescheduling can be directed to the Hearing Examiner's Office at (206) 296-4660. DDES--Land Use Services Division Attn: Permit Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 December 16, 2003 Date Mailed If you have any questions regarding the appeal procedures, please contact the planner at the phone number listed above. If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, call (206) 296-660 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (TTY). ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton WA 98055-1219 DATE: TO: FM: December 17, 2003 Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council King County Council Greg Borba, Planning Supervisor Land Use Services Division RE: Introductory Ordinances for Preliminary Plats Attached are Introductory Ordinance(s) for the Hearing Examiner's agenda scheduled for public hearing, as follows: File No. L03P0006-LIBERTY GROVE SUBDIVISION scheduled to be heard on February 10, 2004. A copy of the hearing agenda for each item is also attached for your information. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 296-7118. Attachments MAIN FILE COPY .. title .. body AN ORDINANCE authorizing a subdivision on certain property located north of SE 136'h Street and between 15s'h Ave SE and 160'h Ave SE, at the request of Wayne Jones, Lakeridge Development, department of development and environmental services file no. L03P0006 . ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton WA 98055-1219 PRELIMINARY PLAT AGENDA HEARING EXAMINER FOR METROPOLITAN-KING COUNTY COUNCIL LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION, BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK KING COUNTY DDES HEARING ROOM 900 OAKESDALE A VE SW, RENTON WA February 10, 2004-PUBLIC HEARING 9:30 a.m, or as soon thereafter as possible FILE NO. L03P0006-LIBERTY GROVE PRELIMINARY PLAT REQUEST Owner: Wayne Jones, Lakeridge Development Address/Phone: PO Box 146 Renton, WA 98057 Phone: (425) 228-9750 STR: SE 14-23-05 Location: Located north of SE 136 1h Street and between 158 1h Ave SE and 1601 h Avenue SE Proposed Use: To subdivide into 24 lots for detached single-family residences and tracts for recreation and drainage facilities. The applicant proposes to use 5 density credit transfers to plat the 24 lots if the related rezone is denied. Land Measurement: 4.6 acres Fire District: No. 25 School District: #411 Issaquah ® DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER February 10, 2004 -PUBLIC HEARING AT 9:30 AM Hearing Room at DDES 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 PROPOSED REZONE AND PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LIBERTY GROVE FILE NO's: L03TY403 & L03P0006 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO's: #2004-0004 & #2004-0006 A. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION: This is a request for reclassification from R-4 to R-6 to allow greater density on the subject property to subdivide the site into 24 lots. Should the rezone be denied, the applicant alternatively plans to use transfer of 5 density credits to implement the same plat design with 24 lots. The 24 lots would mostly have 6,000 square feet in area. As part of the plat, a recreation area is proposed. A drainage detention area would be constructed off site with the plat of Liberty Grove Contiguous. Existing buildings inside the plat will be demolished. Direct access to all lots is proposed from an internal street. This street will connect to 1601 " Ave. SE. See Attachment I for the proposed plat design. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: Proponent: Representative: Wayne Jones, Jr. Lakeridge Development Inc. PO Box 146 Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-228-9750 e-mail: joneswayne@qwest.net Mel L. Daley, P.E. Daley-Morrow-Poblete, Inc. Auburn Way North Phone: 253-333-2200 Facsimile: 253-333-2206 Location: Lying south of SE 1361h St. between 160 1h Ave. SE and 162'" Ave. SE. Section/Township/Range: SE 14-23-05 Parcels # 3664500141 Acreage Plat: 4.84 acres Current Zoning: R-4 Number of Lots: Proposed -24 w/5 TOR Density: 5.2 dwellings per acre Lot Size: generally 6,000 square feet Proposed Use: single family Sewage Disposal: City of Renton Water Supply: Water District #90 Fire District: King County Fire District# 25 School District: Issaquah Community Plan: Newcastle Drainage Subbasin: Lower Cedar River King County Permits: Rezone and Subdivision Complete Application Date: May 15, 2003 Exhibit No. _...,i--,=:---~- ltem No . ...W~i,..J,..:a:.::~-- Aeceived ~-... /~__,~- King County Hearing Examiner (Date Plat Filed March 11, 2003 & Rezone May 7, 2004) MAIN FILE COPY Threshold Determination: Date of Issuance: L03TY403 & L03P0006 Liberty Grove Page 2 Mitigated Determination ofNonsignificance (MDNS) December 16, 2003 KC Permit Contact: Karen Scharer, Project Manager ll, Current Planning Section, LUSD Phone # 296-71 14 or e-mail at karen.scharer@metrokc.gov C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: I. For the preliminary plat of Liberty Grove (L03P0006), the Subdivision Technical Committee (STC) of King County has conducted an on-site examination of the subject propetty. The STC discussed the proposed development with the applicant and clarified technical details of the application to determine the compatibility with applicable King County plans, codes, and other official documents. In mid December 2003, the STC determined that there was sufficient information presented to proceed with issuance of a SEPA TD and scheduling of a public hearing on the requests. 2. Under KCC 20.20.070, the request for rezone (Type 4 permit) is not vested under regulations in effect at the time of complete rezone application. Vesting to zoning can only occur once the zone becomes effective. The plat application (Type 3 permit) is based on the rezone to R-6; therefore the plat with rezone can not be vested to zoning. If the rezone is denied, the applicant's alternative plat layout under the existing R-4 zone with use of density credit transfer is vested to codes in effect at the time of complete application (May 15, 2003 ). D. THRESHOLD DETERMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE: Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43 .21 C, the responsible official of the Land Use Services Division (LUSD) issued a threshold determination -mitigated determination of non-significance (MDNS) for the proposed development on December 16, 2003. This determination was based on the review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent documents, resulting in the conclusion that the proposal would not cause probable significant adverse impacts on the environment with implementation of mitigation for the proposal. Therefore, an environmental impact statement (EIS) was not required prior to proceeding with the review process. Agencies, affected Native American tribes and the public were offered the opportunity to comment on or appeal the determination for 21 days. The MDNS was not appealed by any party, including the applicant, and it has been incorporated as part of the applicant's proposal. The MDNS states: The following mitigation measures shall be attached as conditions of permit issuance. These mitigation measures are consistent with policies, plans, rules, or regulations designated by KCC 20.44.080 as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority and in effect when this threshold determination is issued. Key sources of substantive authority for each mitigation measure are in parentheses; however, other sources of substantive authority may exist but are not expressly listed. Individually, or joint with other area developers, the Applicant shall design and construct improvements to Southeast 128th Street at 1601h Ave. SE to mitigate project impacts at the High Accident Location. Or, the Applicant shall reduce the project impacts at the High Accident Location by completing the remainder of the improvements to Southeast 136th Street (i.e. additional paving, concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks), between 158th Avenue SE and 160th Avenue SE, and, revise the channelization at the intersection of 156th Avenue SE/SE 136th Street to provide a southbound left tum lane. E. AGENCIES CONTACTED: I. King County Natural Resources & Parks Division: No response. L03TY403 & L03P0006 Liberty Grove Page 3 2. King County Fire Protection Engineer: Fire protection engineering preliminary approval has been granted as requested. 3. Seattle-King County Health Department: No response. 4. Issaquah School District: See comments contained in report and Attachment 3. 5. Water District# 90: See Attachment 4. 6. City of Renton: See Attachments 5 for all letters received from Renton. 7. Washington State Department of Ecology: No response. 8. Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife: No response. 9. Washington State Department of Natural Resources: No response. 10. Washington State Department of Transportation: No response. 11. METRO: No response. F. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT: I. Topography: The site slightly slopes with a 12-foot difference in elevation from the northwest comer to the southeast comer of the site. 2. Soils: Surface soils are found on this site per King County Soil Survey, 1973 include: AgC -Alderwood gravely, sandy loam; 6-15 % slopes. Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight. This soil type has a moderate limitation for low building foundations due to a seasonally high water table, and severe limitations for septic tank filter fields due to very slow permeability in the substratum. 3. Sensitive Areas: The site has been field checked by DDES staff. Additionally, both the November 5, 2002 Wetland Evaluation and Delineation Report by Habitat Technologies, and July 18, 2003 information update by H & S Consulting were reviewed. The wetland buffer is present near the southeast comer of the site which would provide protection for the Class II wetland to the south. The wetland off site requires a 50 foot buffer from the wetland edge and a 15 foot building setback line from the 50 foot wetland buffer. If road improvements to SE 136 1 1, St. between 158 1h Ave SE and 160 1h Ave SE are required as a result of the platting ofEvendell or Liberty Grove, wetland buffer would then be unnecessary due to the road improvement severing the remaining wetland (south) from area north of the road improvement. Improvements to the downstream drainage system will have to be reviewed to ensure that no wetlands are being drained or flooded as a result, no streams placed in pipes, or no streams damaged by increased flows. Enlarging culverts, if any, in a sensitive area requires a clearing and grading permit. 4. Hydrography: A preliminary March 3, 2003 Technical Information Report was prepared by DALEY-Morrow-Poblete, Inc., as well as, a revision on July 11, 2003 titled: Level One Downstream Drainage Analysis. The site is within the Orting Hills subbasin of the Cedar River watershed. Flooding has occurred in the past along downstream conveyance structures on 160 1 h Ave. SE, and on nearby properties. Recently, improvements have been made by King County providing better conveyance along 160 1 h Ave SE. To further address issues of providing appropriate drainage facilities, the applicant has obtained approval of a Drainage Adjustment addressing variances for both the plat of Liberty Grove and Liberty Grove Contiguous. This adjustment was approved December 4, 2003, File L03V00065. The following information regarding this property is detailed in the Drainage Adjustment approval: L03TY403 & L03P0006 Liberty Grove Page 4 Stormwater from Liberty Grove and western Liberty Grove Contiguous flows meet 1/., mile south on 160 11 ' A venue SE at a newly upgraded culvert crossing. Combined flows then cross parcel # 145750-0110 to the east to rejoin eastern Liberty Grove Contiguous flows in the vicinity of the 162"" Avenue SE unopened right-of-way. Both sites have upstream tributary area of several acres. Most runoff from the Liberty Grove plat will be collected and it will diverted to a single, combined detention and water quality facility located in the southwest comer of the Liberty Grove Contiguous plat. Flows across the Liberty Grove Contiguous site will also be collected and diverted to the single, shared facility. The allowed release will then be proportionally split between the southern flows on the east side of ! 60'h A venue SE and the natural discharge path that runs south through the neighboring parcels. Nuisance flows across the south property line of Liberty Grove Contiguous would be significantly curtailed. A small reduction of flow would occur in the western ditch of l 60'h Avenue SE, offset by an increase in the eastern ditch. The Level One Downstream Analysis identified drainage complaints related to conveyance overflows at 14028 1601h Avenue SE (Brenden/Myers) and in the southeast comer of the 145750- 0110 parcel and adjacent neighbor (Gragg) to the south. Continuing to utilize the natural discharge path that traverses the center of the intervening parcels reduces the volume of total flows that would reach the problem conveyance area and would minimize the diversion of flows. The applicant has offered mitigation in the forn1 of Level Three flow control in the on-site detention system and, via a combination of flow control and splitting outflows, maintaining predeveloped flowrates to parcel 145750-0110. Potential conveyance upgrades along any of the downstream paths will be addressed in the plat conditions. Conditions ofL03V0065 December 4, 2003 approval, allowing the diversion of runoff to a single, shared facility draining via flow splitter to two downstream paths are as follows: I. The release rates for the detention facility will be based on all of the tributary area to be developed being directed to the facility. 2. The volume for the detention facility will be based on all flows directed to the facility at full development under current zoning. The allowed release rate will be reduced by any undetained flows that would bypass the proposed subdivision drainage facilities. The detention volume shall be sized using the Level Three flow control standard in the 1998 KCSWDM. A 10 to 20 percent volumetric factor of safety must be applied to all storm events requiring detention. The design Technical Information Report shall state the factor of safety selected and the basis of tliat determination. 3. Water quality facilities must be sized based on the entire proposed subdivision draining to the facilities including any required frontage improvements. 4. All onsite or offsite drainage facilities must be located in a public right-of-way, recreation space tract with easement or storm drainage tract dedicated to King County. 5. Developed flows from Liberty Grove must be conveyed via tightline to the drainage facility located in the Liberty Grove Contiguous site. If not built concurrently, Liberty Grove Contiguous must precede Liberty Grove. 6. Additional storm drainage requirements identified by SEP A or tlie plat hearing review will apply to this project. Note that Liberty Grove is contingent on approval of the plat of Liberty Grove Contiguous. Also note that there are no specific requirements under the SEPA Threshold Determination(s) regarding drainage. 5. Vegetation: The site is mostly covered by pasture. Surrounding the house on the east is grass lawn. There are a number of large trees mainly scattered on the east end of the parcel. Additionally, evergreen hedging is planted along portions of the southwest, west, and northwest property lines. L03TY403 & L03P0006 Liberty Grove Page 5 6. Wildlife: A wildlife study in conjunction with the wetland evaluation and delineation report, was prepared for this site and dated November 5, 2002. A large variety of small birds and animals were observed on site. According to DOES Senior Ecologist, none of the species identified in the applicant's report are required to be protected in the urban designated part of the County where this project lies. G. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The site is located in the east potential annexation area of Renton. Properties located nearby vary in size from large 5-acre parcels to small urban lots. The neighborhood is rapidly changing from a rural-suburban character to an urbanized area with mostly single family homes and some related services such as schools, a fire station, churches and parks. Developed lots immediately nearby are on septic systems. These lots are approximately 9,000 square feet to 30,000 square feet in size. Many of the parcels are currently considered as under utilized within the urban designation. Zoning immediately surrounding the plat of Liberty Grove is R-4. However, still pending as of the date of this report is the court challenge to the King County Council decision denying the reclassification request for the plat of Evendell from R-4 to R-6 (LOI TY40 l ). The plat of Evendell located south across SE 1361h St. was preliminarily approved for 46 lots. King County is currently processing an application for major revision (L03RE038) to allow 70 lots based on R-4 zoning with density credit transfers. The examiner hearing on this application was held on January 22, 2004. Anyone wishing to obtain a copy of the examiner's decision regarding this plat should contact the examiner's office at 206-296-4660. Nichol's Place, L03POOl 5 is scheduled for plat hearing on February 24, 2004. This plat with 23 lots is located just south of Evendell. The primarily approved plat of Hamilton Place (L02POOl l) is located on property 320 feet north of the site between l58'h Ave. SE & l60'h Ave. SE. Lots proposed would average approximately 5,000-sq. ft. each. Transfer of 6 density credits was approved for this plat. The parcel with the preliminarily approved plat of "5 Lot Subdivision" also known as Dickinson, LOOP0023 is located south off 162nd Ave. SE and contains 5 lots averaging .9 d.u.'s per acre. Hornes would be served by septic and dry sewers will be installed as part of plat approval. This plat is currently in for engineering review. ODES also has held other pre-application meetings for plats in the immediate area. Timing for submittal of further applications is unknown. On-Site: The existing residence gains access off 1601h Ave. SE, although the site also has frontage on 1581h Ave. SE. There are also out buildings on the northeastern portion of the site. The majority of the site west of the home is in pasture. Most of the existing trees scattered on site will need to be removed for plat and home construction. On the northeast portion of the site is a easement for an existing drainfield which serves property oft:site. Plat approval will require that the easement be abandoned and connection to the sewer line being brought to the neighborhood. H. SUBDIVISION DESIGN FEATURES: I. Lot Pattern and Density: The proposed lot and street layout is in conformance with King County Codes (i.e. KCC 21A and the 1993 King County Road Standards. Density calculations for the plat average 5.2 d.u.'s per acre. The 24 lots are generally 6,000 square feet in area. 2. Internal Circulation: Most lots will front onto the internal public street that provides within the subdivision and exits out to 160 1h Ave. SE. Two Joint Use Development Tracts (JUDT's) and a Private Access Tract (PAT)will connect eight lots to the internal public street. See the proposed plat layout, Attachment 1 to this report. L03TY403 & L03P0006 Liberty Grove Page 6 3. Roadway Section: As proposed by the applicant, 160'h Ave. SE frontage would be improved with urban improvements, including curd, gutter and sidewalks. Widening of the north 'I, of SE 136'h St. between 158th Ave SE and 1601h Ave. SE may occur as an improvement alternative. SE 135m PL within the plat will be improved to the urban subaccess street standard. The two J.U.D.T.'s at the west end of the plat will each serve two lots. The PAT will serve four lots on the north east portion of the site. 4. Drainage: The Liberty Grove site is located in the Orting Hills subbasin of the Lower Cedar River basin. The existing site drainage sheet flows to the south and southwest, entering a well defined ditch along the south property boundary. The ditch flows east to the west side of 160111 Ave SE into a ditch flowing south. The flow path continues south in the roadside ditch, through several driveway culverts about '!. mile to a new 24 inch cross culvert under 160 1h Ave SE. The drainage then continues south in a ditch and newly upgraded culvert along the east side of 1601h Ave SE, turning east at approximately 300 feet south of the cross culvert. The flow continues easterly through Lot 6 of Cedar Parks Five Acre Tracts to a stream channel flowing south in the unopened R/W for l 62"<l Ave SE. The drainage continues south and west along the south side of SE 144111 St, eventually entering the Cedar River. A drainage adjustment (L03V0065) is approved for this site and for the Liberty Grove Continuous site (L03P0005). The proposal will combine both post developed drainage facilities on the Liberty Grove Continuous site (east side of 1601h Ave SE). The facility is to be designed to the Level 3 flow control standard and the basic water quality menu. The new detention facility outlet is proposed to flow into the existing drainage system along the east side of 160 1h Ave SE. A flow splitter is proposed to maintain existing flows to the south. Offsite improvements along the downstream portion of the east side of l 60the Ave SE are also proposed. The existing ditch and culverts are to be improved to provide adequate capacity. A Conceptual Drainage Plan was received March 11, 2003 showing the combined facility and proposed conveyance pipes. Also see comments above in Section F-4 of this report. I. TRANSPORTATION PLANS: 1. Transportation Plans: The King County Transportation Plan indicates that 160111 Ave. SE, 158 111 Ave SE and SE l 36th 1h Street are non-Arterial Roads. The King County Nonmotorized Transportation Plan does not designate these roadway for bicycles of equestrian use. The subject subdivision is not in conflict with this Transportation Plan, the King County Regional Trails Plan, nor Nonmotorized Plan. 2. Subdivision Access: The subdivision will gain access from one access point off 1601h Ave. SE. Trips will be sent to the intersection of Southeast 128th Street at 160th Avenue Southeast which has, as of June 2003, been placed upon King County DOT's High Accident Location list (ID: HAL #16). The recommended countermeasure is to construct both east and west left mrn channelization at the intersection. These improvement measures are appropriately required prior to King County approving further development that would reduce the level of safety by adding vehicles trips to this intersection. Therefore, due to the additional impacts, mitigation of project impacts at this intersection is necessary and was made a condition of the MONS. Alternatively, if another local access route would be provided and development impacts could be mitigated, improvements at the intersection could be deferred. The alternative local access route would be at SE 136"' St. between 156'" Ave. SE and 160'" Ave. SE provided that the 70 lot plat design for Evendell is approved and constructed. The Evendell improvements with the 70 lot design include a 'half-street' improvement opposite the frontage of this plat of Liberty Grove. Completion of the balance of the improvements by this Applicant (Liberty Grove) could provide a more attractive alternative route for project-generated trips that would otherwise enter the HAL at SE 128'" St. identified by King County DOT. This alternative is also afforded under the MONS. Typically, absent a direct connection to this roadway, improvements to Southeast 136th Street by the Applicant for the proposed plat of Liberty Grove would not be required as a condition of plat approval or under a MONS. However, by completing the improvements to Subcollector Street (Urban) standards, project-generated trips of the plat of Liberty Grove would have an alternative westbound access (towards the City of Renton) along Southeast !28th Street at the signalized intersection of 156th J L03TY403 & L03P0006 Liberty Grove Page 7 Avenue SE. Additionally, project-generated trips would have the alternative access to SR-169 from plat-generated trips by use of SE 136'" Street (in lieu of traveling northbound on 160" Ave. SE., making the left turn at the intersection of 128'" Street -the HAL -and another leti turn at the 156"' Ave. SE signal). Mitigations are listed in Section D of this report. Under either scenario, road improvements would to assure a safe access route for resulting traffic from this plat. 3. Traffic Generation: It is expected that approximately 240 vehicle trips per day will be generated with full development of the proposed subdivision. This calculation includes service vehicles (i.e., mail delivery, garbage pick-up, school bus) which may currently serve this neighborhood, as well as work trips, shopping, etc. 4. Adequacy of Arterial Roads: This proposal has been reviewed under the criteria in King County Code 14.70, Transportation Concurrency Management; 14.80, Intersection Standards; and King County Code 14.75; Mitigation Payment System. a. King County Code 14.70 -Transportation Concurrency Management: The Transportation Certificate of Concurrency indicates that transportation improvements or strategies will be in place at the time of development, or that a financial commitment is in place to complete the improvements or strategies within six ( 6) years, according to RCW 36. 70A.070( 6 ). b. King County Code 14.80 -Intersection Standards: The arterial system will accommodate the increased traffic volume generated by this proposal provided the conditions of the SEPA MDNS are implemented. See Section D of this report for conditions and Section I. 2. above for a discussion of the status of the intersect of SE 128'h St. and 1601h Ave SE. c. King County Code 14.75 -Mitigation Payment System: King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), requires the payment of a traffic impact mitigation fee (MPS fee) and an administration fee for each single family residential lot or unit created. MPS fees are determined by the zone in which the site is located. This site is in Zone 452 per the MPS/Quartersection list. MPS fees may be paid at the time of final plat recording, or deferred until building permits are issued. The amount of the fee will be determined by the applicable fee ordinance at the time the fee is collected. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Schools: This proposal has been reviewed under RCW 58.17 .110 and King County Code 2 lA.28 (School Adequacy). a. School Facilities: The subject subdivision will be served by the Issaquah School District (Briarwood, Maywood Middle, & Liberty High schools). b. School Capacity: The Issaquah School Board has adopted capacity figures which indicate their ability to accommodate additional students. The capacity figures for 2004 through 2008 show at minimum an excess capacity of 779 per the 2002 Capital Facilities Plan for the District. The figures reveal the district has adequate capacity to accommodate the anticipated students generated by this proposal. c. School Impact Fees: The Issaquah School District has adopted a fee of$4,617 for each new single family residential unit. A total of 24 new dwellings would be added to the Issaquah District. d. School Access: The Issaquah District has provided information as to the location of existing bus stops. This information is reflected on the School Walkway Access Study submitted Sept. 3, 2003. The current bus stop for middle and high school students is located at the intersection of SE 130 1h Street with 162nd Ave SE. Bussing occurs at L03TY403 & L03P0006 Liberty Grove Page 8 present due to lack of safe walkways to the schools. It is the District's position that with the influx of new students in the area as a result of new homes being built, new urban developments nearby should provide acceptable walking facilities to the local schools. The local schools serving this property are all within one mile of the plat of Liberty Grove. The school district has submitted updated information indicating that the existing bus stop for Liberty High School and Maywood Middle School is at SE 130'" Street and l 62"d Ave. SE. Currently the area is underdeveloped and has poor pedestrian connections; bus service for students within one mile of the schools has been provided by the district. The district views this bus service as temporary only and requests that with construction of new nearby housing developments, safe walking access to schools be provided. Per a request by DDES, the applicant of Liberty Grove and Liberty Grove Contiguous provided information clarifying which streets that have been improved with pedestrian walkways. A narrative indicated that a walkway system to Liberty High School is not feasible. DDES staff has taken exception to this analysis and finds that a walkway is feasible along SE 135'" Street between 160 1" Ave SE and 166'" Ave. SE. (then south on 166'" Ave SE one block to the school). This location of a walkway would provide a high level of visibility of the students walking from nearby residences and students would only need to walk past one wooded parcel on the south side of SE 135 1 " Street. Additionally, an alternative access to Liberty High School is planned in conjunction with the plat of"5 Lot Subdivision". Paved sidewalks and a paved pedestrian walkway are planned from the subdivision frontage on 162"d Ave. SE east/southeast to the southwest corner of the Liberty High School where there is a gated school entry. This subdivision is also scheduled to construct safe access to the middle school, a four foot wide graveled path south from the southeast corner of the plat, south along 164'" Ave. SE to SE 142"d St. (if extended). The district has determined that the walking area between SE 142nd St. and SE 144'" St. on 164'" Ave SE is safe, as the street paving is approximately 30 feet wide with very little traffic. There are already safe walking conditions on SE 144'" St. for school children to walk from 164'" Ave SE east to the middle school. 2. Parks and Recreation Space: The nearest public park is located on the south west corner of l 52"d Ave. SE and SE 136'" St. The applicant has proposed on-site recreation areas Tract B on the north central area of the plat. The details of improvements will be designed and submitted for approval prior to final plat. KCC 21 A. l 4 requires subdivisions in the UR and R zone classifications to either provide on-site recreation space or pay a fee to the Parks Division for establishment and maintenance of neighborhood parks. The recreation area, Tract B will contain 9,360 sq. ft. which equals the minimum required area. Per KCC 21 A.14.180 E, one tot lot and one additional playground/recreational facilities will be required. 3. Fire Protection: The Certificate of Water Availability from W. D. 90 indicates that water is presently available to the site in sufficient quantity to satisfy King County Fire Flow Standards. Prior to final recording of the plat, the water service facilities must be reviewed and approved per King County Fire Flow Standards. K. UTILITIES: l. Sewage Disposal: A Certificate of Sewer Availability, dated April 17, 2003 indicates the city's capability to serve the proposed development and Liberty Grove. A sewage pump station will be required to be constructed as these plats can not be served by gravity flow. Currently, the lift station planned would be located off-site. The existing sewer line will be L03TY403 & L03P0006 Liberty Grove Page 9 extended east along SE 1361h Street to 162"d Ave. SE (2,600 linear feet) to provide connection to Renton's sewer system. 2. Water Supply: The applicant proposes to serve the subject subdivision with water from Water District 90. A Certificate of Water Availability, dated January 8, 2003, indicates this district's capability to serve the proposed development. L. COMPREHENSIVE AND COMMUNITY PLAN: I. Comprehensive Plan 2000 Land Use Map: This proposal is governed by the 2000 King County Comprehensive Plan with Land Use Map that designates this area as "Urban Residential, 4-12 dwellings per acre". 2. The following policies and principles of the Comprehensive Plan are relevant to the proposed rezone and subdivision: a. Chapter 2-Urban Land Use, B. Residential Land Use, Section # 2 U-114 King County shall seek to achieve through future planning efforts over the next twenty years, an average zoning density of at least seven to eight homes per acre in the Urban Growth Area through a mix of densities and housing types. A lower density zone may be used to recognize existing subdivisions with little or no opportunity for infill or redevelopment. U-118 King County should apply minimum density requirements to all urban residential zones of four or more homes per acre, except under limited circumstances such as the: a. Presence of significant physical constraints, or b. Implementation of standards applied to a property through a property-specific development condition, special district overlay, or subarea plan. Comment: The proposal would yield an overall density of 5.2 dwellings per acre. b. Chapter 2-Urban Land Use, B. Residential Land Use, Section# 3.-Increases of Zoning Density: While King County supports higher densities in the urban areas, increased densities that would be incompatible with existing neighborhoods or cause significant impacts on roads, services and the environment are discouraged. The following policies will guide decisions on application of densities and proposed rezones. U-120 King County shall not approve proposed zoning changes to increase density within the Urban Area unless: a. The development will be compatible with the character and scale of the surrounding neighborhood; Comment: The area is in transition from an under utilized urban area to more of an urban area with a full range of urban services for the residents. There are other similar residential developments in the neighborhood currently under construction or in the planning stages (see Section G of this report). b. Urban public facilities and services are adequate, consistent with adopted levels of service and meet GMA concurrency requirements, including King County transportation concurrency standards; Comment: Urban services are available to the property and concurrency standards are met. c. The proposed density change will not increase unmitigated adverse impacts on environmentally sensitive areas, either on site or in the vicinity of the proposed development; L03TY403 & L03P0006 Liberty Grove Page IO Comment: The Class 11 Wetland off site and to the south will be preserved under the Standards ofKCC 21 A.24. Buffer area will be reduced on the north side of the wetland should SE 136'h St. be improved. d. The proposed density increase will be consistent with or contribute to achieving the goals and policies of this Comprehensive Plan, and subarea plan, if applicable; and Comment: The proposed density is within the density range of 4-12 dwellings per acre as designated by the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Also see the Analysis Section of this report. e. The proposal is consistent with the adopted city comprehensive plan for the Potential Annexation Area where the rezone is located if the proposed density exceeds eight dwelling units per acre. If the city is not planning for urban densities and efficient land use patterns consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies, then this paragraph shall not apply. Comment: The proposal is consistent with the adopted City of Renton Comprehensive Plan in effect when this application was submitted. The density does not exceed eight dwellings per acre. U-121 King County, when evaluating rezone requests for increases in density, shall notify adjacent cities, special purpose districts and local providers of urban utility services and should work with these service providers on issues raised by the proposal. Comment: ODES notified the City of Renton and the city has responded to this request through a letter (Attachment 5). Road improvement standards to be used for build out this plat would seem the only issues of concern raised by the City. U-122 King County supports increases in urban residential density through a rezone or a proposal to increase density through the density transfer or density incentive programs when the proposal will help resolve traffic, sewer, water, parks or open space deficiencies in the immediate neighborhood. Comment: Under the SEPA MONS SE 1281h Street intersection improvements, or alternatively frontage improvements along the north side of SE 136'h St. will be constructed between 158'h Ave. SE and SE I 60'h Street. M. CRITERIA FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPROVAL: 1. KCC 21A.44.060 Zone reclassification. A zone reclassification shall be granted only if the applicant demonstrates that the proposal complies with the criteria for approval specified in KCC 20.24.180 and 20.24.190 and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and applicable community and functional plans. Comment: See Section L above for a discussion of applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies and the Analysis Section of this report below. 2. KCC 20.24.180 Examiner findings. When the examiner renders a decision or recommendation, he or she shall make and enter findings of fact and conclusions from the record which support the decision and the findings and conclusions shall set forth and demonstrate the manner in which the decision or recommendation is consistent with, carries out and helps implement applicable state laws and regulations and the regulations, policies, objectives and goals of the comprehensive plan, subarea or community plans, the zoning code, the land segregation code and other official laws, policies and objectives of King County, and that the recommendation or decision will not be unreasonably incompatible with or detrimental to affected properties and the general public. 3. KCC 20.24.190 Additional examiner findings -reclassifications and shoreline redesignations. When the examiner issues a recommendation regarding an application for a reclassification of property or for a shoreline environment redesignation, the recommendation shall include additional findings that support the conclusion that at least one of the following circumstances applies: L03TY403 & L03P0006 Liberty Grove A. The property is potentially zoned for the reclassification being requested and conditions have been met that indicate the reclassification is appropriate; B. An adopted subarea plan or area zoning specifies that the property shall be subsequently considered through an individual reclassification application; Page 11 C. Where a subarea plan has been adopted but subsequent area zoning has not been adopted. that the proposed reclassification or shoreline redesignation is consistent with the adopted subarea plan; or D. The applicant has demonstrated with substantial evidence that: 1. Since the last previous area zoning or shoreline environment designation of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other conditions or circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone substantial and material change not anticipated or contemplated in the subarea plan or area zoning; 2. The impacts from the changed conditions or circumstances affect the subject property in a manner and to a degree different than other properties in the vicinity such that area rezoning or redesignation is not appropriate; For the purposes of this subsection, "changed conditions or circumstances" does not include actions taken by the current or former property owners to facilitate a more intense development of the property including but not limited to changing tax limitations, adjusting property lines, extending services, or changing property ownership; 3. For proposals to increase rural residential density, that the proposal meets the criteria in Comprehensive Plan policies R-205 through R-209; 4. For proposals to increase urban residential density, that the proposal meets the criteria in Comprehensive Plan policies U-118 through U-123; and 5. The requested reclassification or redesignation is in the public interest. (Ord. 14047 § 12, 2001: Ord. 4461 § 10, 1979). Comment: KCC 21A.24.190 (A), (B), and (C) do not apply to the subject rezone application. The relevant criterion under the additional Examiner Finding is KCC 20.24.190 (D). Prior to the adoption of the 1995 KC Comprehensive Plan and Area Zoning, the property was zoned SR-15,000 which was an urban zone designation that allowed development of property into lots 15,000 square feet in size and allowed/assumed on site septic/drainfields would be provided for the disposal of sewage for new development. With adoption of the 1994 Comprehensive Plan, and 1995 Area Zoning conversion process, the property was rezoned from SR-15000 to R-4. This R-4 zone continued to permit urban residential development on septic/drainfield systems in the Service Planning Area provided that dry sewers would be installed & a future service agreement were signed. Now under the 2000 Comprehensive Plan and Ord.# 14049, both effective as of March 12, 2001, all new residential development in the urban area must be served by sewer. Providing sewer to this and other properties in the immediate area will require a sewage pump station to facilitate new residential development at either R-4 or R-6 zoning density. As currently planned, and recognized under preliminary plat approval, a pump station will be constructed on the plat of Evendell to the south. This pump station would serve this plat and other properties nearby. If the plat ofEvendell is not constructed, the applicant would be required to construct a pump station and obtain the City ofRenton's approval for the alternative location. As of the writing of this report, a court decision has not yet been made regarding the reclassification request of Evendell which if approved would allow 70 lots under a R-6 designation. N. PLAT STATUTES/CODES: 1. If approved with the recommended conditions in this report, the proposed development will comply with the requirements of the County and State Platting Codes and Statutes, and the lots in the proposed subdivision will comply with the minimum dimensional requirements of the zone district. 2. King County Road Standards Section 1.03 -Responsibility to Provide Roadway Improvements: A. Any land development which will impact the service level, safety, or operational efficiency of serving roads or is required by other County code or ordinance to improve L03TY403 & L03P0006 Liberty Grove Page 12 such roads shall improve those roads in accordance with these Standards. The extent of off-site improvements to serving roads shall be based on an assessment of the impacts of the proposed land development by the Reviewing Agency ... 3. RCW 58.17.110 Approval or disapproval of subdivision and dedication-Factors to be considered-Conditions for approval-Finding-Release from damages. (I) The city, town, or county legislative body shall inquire into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of the subdivision and dedication. It shall determine: a) If appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public health, safety and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts, including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school; and (b) whether the public interest will be served by the subdivision and dedication. (2) A proposed subdivision and dedication shall not be approved unless the city, town, or county legislative body makes written findings that: (a) Appropriate provisions are made for the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds and all other relevant facts, including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school; and (b) the public use and interest will be served by the platting of such subdivision and dedication. If it finds that the proposed subdivision and dedication make such appropriate provisions and that the public use and interest will be served, then the legislative body shall approve the proposed subdivision and dedication ... 4. KCC 20.24.180 Examiner findings. See Section M 2. above. 5. KCC20.24.195 Additional examiner findings -preliminary plats. When the examiner makes a decision regarding an application for a proposed preliminary plat, the decision shall include additional findings as to whether: A. Appropriate provisions are made for the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds and all other relevant facts, including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school; and 8. The public use and interest will be served by the platting of such subdivision and dedication. (Ord. 12196 § 38, 1996: Ord. 9544 § 16, 1990). 6. 21A.12.030 Densities and dimensions -residential zones. A. Densities and dimensions -residential zones. Base Density: 4 dwelling units per acre Maximum Density: 6 dwelling units per acre Minimum Density: 85% of base density 8. Development conditions. 1. This maximum density may be achieved only through the application of residential density incentives in accordance with ... transfers of development rights in accordance with K.C.C. chapter 21A.37 .. . 7. 21A.37.030 Transfer of development rights (TDR) program -receiving sites. A. Receiving sites shall be: I. King County unincorporated urban sites, ... zoned R-4 .... The sites may also be within potential annexation areas established under the countywide planning policies; or. .. 8. Except as provided in this chapter development of an unincorporated King County receiving site shall remain subject to all zoning code provisions for the base zone, except TDR receiving site developments shall comply with dimensional standards L03TY403 & L03P0006 Liberty Grove Page 13 of the zone with a base density most closely comparable to the total approved density of the TOR receiving site development. C. An unincorporated King County receiving site may accept development rights from one or more sending sites, up to the maximum density permitted under K.C.C. 21A.12.030 and 21A.12.040. 0. ANALYSIS / CONCLUSIONS: 1. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21C, the responsible official of the Land Use Services Division (LUSD) issued a threshold determination - mitigated determination of non-significance (MONS) for the proposed rezone and plat on December 16, 2003. This determination was based on the review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent documents, resulting in the conclusion that with implementation of mitigation, the proposal would not cause probable significant adverse impacts on the environment. 2. DOES recognizes that circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone substantial and material change since the last previous area zoning which was not anticipated or contemplated by that area zoning in that Title 13 now requires all urban subdivisions to connect to sewer. Previously, a plat could be approved on septic if dry sewer lines were installed. 3. Although required by KCC 20.24.190, the applicant has not demonstrated with substantial evidence any impacts from changed conditions or circumstances since the last previous area zoning that affect the subject property in a manner and to a degree different than other properties in the vicinity. 4. Comprehensive Plan Policy U-122 supports increases in urban residential density when the proposal will help resolve traffic, sewer, water, parks or open space deficiencies in the immediate neighborhood. In the instant situation, the plat application will provide basic neighborhood infrastructure benefits in the form of road improvements on 160 1h Avenue Southeast and other improvements which would commonly be required as part of preliminary approval for a plat. There has not been an offer by the applicant to provide neighborhood improvements beyond that which would normally be expected with preliminary plat approval under the R-4 designation and SEP A. It is noted that KCC 21A.37 -transfer of density does not require an applicant of a plat to "benefit a neighborhood" beyond the basic needs for implementation and approval of the plat. 5. Potential adverse impacts to environmentally sensitive areas on site and environmental constraints in the vicinity will be adequately mitigated through the King County Code. 6. King County has notified the City of Renton and other local agencies of the request. The City concurs that the density proposed is consistent with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan for this Potential Annexation Area adopted at the time this plat was vested. The density does not exceed six dwellings per acre. The City did express concern with road improvement standards to be used. At this time an interlocal agreement has not been signed between the two jurisdictions by which King County would alternatively recognize City of Renton standards for street improvements. 7. The subject subdivision with density credit transfer will comply with the goals and objectives of the King County Comprehensive Plan and will comply with the requirements of the Subdivision and Zoning Codes and other official land use controls of King County, based on the recommendation below conditions for final plat approval. L03TY403 & L03P0006 Liberty Grove Page 14 P. RECOMMENDATIONS: L03TY401 -Deny reclassification from R-4 to R-6. L03P0006 -Grant preliminary approval of the September 3, 2003 preliminary plat Liberty Grove with transfer of density credits, subject to the following conditions of final approval: l. a. Compliance with all platting provisions of Title 19 of the King County Code. b. Prior to the recording of Liberty Grove, the plat of Liberty Grove Contiguous shall be recorded as drainage facilities will be constructed off-site in the plat of Liberty Grove Contiguous. 2. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final plat a dedication which includes the language set forth in King County Council Motion No. 5952. 3. a. The plat shall comply with the maximum density (and minimum density) requirements of the R-4 zone classification. All lots shall meet the minimum dimensional requirements of the R-4 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary plat, whichever is larger, except that minor revisions to the plat which do not result in substantial changes may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services. b. The Applicant shall provide Transfer of Density Credit documentation to ODES prior to final approval to allow transfer of a maximum of five density credits. 4. The applicant must obtain final approval from the King County Health Department for abandonment of existing septic systems on-site serving on and off-site homes. 5. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the King County Road Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No. 11187, as amended (1993 KCRS). 6. The applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main, and fire flow standards of Chapter 17.08 of the King County Code. 7. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. a. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual and applicable updates adopted by King County. DOES approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. b. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by DOES Engineering Review, shall be shown on the engineering plans. c. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings # on file with ODES and/or the King County Department of Transportation. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots that are designated for individual lot infiltration systems, L03TY403 & L03P0006 Liberty Grove Page 15 the systems shall be constructed at the time of the building permit and shall comply with plans on file." d. The stormwater detention design shall comply with the Level 2 Flow Control requirements per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). e. The storm water control facility shall be located in a separate tract and dedicated to King County unless portions of the drainage tract are used for required recreation space in accordance with KCC 21A.14.180. 8. A drainage adjustment(L03V0065) is approved for this site and for the Liberty Grove Continuous site L03P0005. The adjustment allows combining the storm water from both subdivisions on the Liberty Grove Continuous site; and routing post developed flows to 160'" Ave SE. A flow splitter is proposed to maintain existing flows to the south. All conditions of approval for this adjustment shall be met prior to engineering plan approval. A Conceptual Drainage Plan showing the preliminary configuration was received March 11, 2003. 9. The stormwater detention facility shall be designed to the Level 3 flow control standard in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual(KCSWDM). The facility shall also be designed to meet the basic water quality menu. 10. The downstream drainage system along the east side of 160'" Ave SE from the south plat boundary of Liberty Grove Continuous to approximately 50 feet south of the culvert 29 (House# 14028); shall be improved to achieve adequate drainage capacity per the 1998 KCSWDM. Culvert 29 is approximately 900 feet south of the southwest corner of this site and is shown in the Level 1 Offsite Analysis received September 3, 2003. Plans and supporting capacity analysis for this improvement shall be submitted with the engineering plans. 11. The I 00-year floodplain for any on-site wetlands or streams shall be shown on the engineering plans and the final plat per Special Requirement #2 of the KCSWDM. 12. The following road improvements are required to be constructed according to the 1993 King County Road Standards(KCRS): a. SE 135'" PL shall be improved to the urban subaccess street standard. b. FRONTAGE: The frontage along 160'" Ave SE shall be improved to the urban neighborhood collector standard(west side only). c. FRONTAGE: The frontage along SE 136'" ST may be improved to the urban standards per the SEP A mitigation list. d. Tract A shall be improved as a private access tract according to Section 2.09 of the KCRS. The tract shall be owned and maintained by the owners of those Lots being served. Tracts C and D shall each be improved as a joint use driveway per Section 3.01 of the KCRS. The tracts shall be owned and maintained by the owners of those Lots being served. e. A R/W radius shall be dedicated at the northeast quadrant of 158th Ave SE and SE 136'" St. (southwest comer of Lot 13), and a second radius shall be dedicated at the northwest quadrant of 160'" Ave SE and SE 136'" St. (southeast comer of Lot 24). f. Modifications to the above road conditions may be considered according to the variance provisions in Section 1.08 of the KCRS. L03TY403 & L03P0006 Liberty Grove Page 16 13. All utilities within proposed rights-of-way must be included within a franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final plat recording. 14. The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by the applicable fee ordinance. The applicant has the option to either: (I) pay the MPS fee at final plat recording, or (2) pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the plat that reads, "All fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), have been paid." If the second option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of building permit application. 15. The proposed subdivision shall comply with the Sensitive Areas Code as outlined in KCC 21 A.24. Preliminary plat review has identified the following specific requirements that apply to this project. All other applicable requirements from KCC 21A.24 shall also be addressed by the applicant: Southeast 136'h Street to the south of the project site may or may not be improved prior to beginning construction on Liberty Grove. If road improvements are made or are in the process of being constructed, then no wetland conditions shall apply. If however the improvements are not made or are not under construction, then the extent of the buffer/wetland area shall be shown on the Plat of Liberty Grove and a Sensitive Areas Tract is required for the protection of the Class II buffer/wetland area for the wetland identified on the Plat of Evendell. 16. The following note shall be shown on the final engineering plan and recorded plat, if wetland buffer is necessary per condition 15 above: RESTRICTIONS FOR SENSITIVE AREA TRACTS AND SENSITIVE AREAS AND BUFFERS Dedication of a sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the tract/sensitive area and buffer. This interest includes the preservation of native vegetation for all purposes that benefit the public health, safety and welfare, including control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the land subject to the tract/sensitive area and buffer the obligation, enforceable on behalf of the public by King County, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the tract/sensitive area and buffer. The vegetation within the tract/sensitive area and buffer may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged without approval in writing from the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services or its successor agency, unless otherwise provided by law. The common boundary between the tract/sensitive area and buffer and the area of development activity must be marked or otherwise flagged to the satisfaction of King County prior to any clearing, grading, building construction or other development activity on a lot subject to the sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer. The required marking or flagging shall remain in place until all development proposal activities in the vicinity of the sensitive area are completed. No building foundations are allowed beyond the required 15-foot building setback line, unless otherwise provided by law. 17. Suitable recreation space shall be provided consistent with the requirements KCC 21A.14.180 and KCC 21A.14.190 in providing sport court[s], children's play equipment. picnic table[ s ], benches, etc. L03TY403 & L03P0006 Liberty Grove Page 17 a. A detailed recreation space plan (i.e., landscape specs, equipment specs, etc.) shall be submitted for review and approval by DDES and King County Parks prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the engineering plans. This plan shall comply with Ordinance # 14045. b. A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording of tbe plat. 18. A homeowners' association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction ofDDES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the recreation, open space and/or sensitive area tract(s). 19. Street trees shall be included in the design of all road improvements, and shall comply with Section 5.03 of the KCRS and KCC 2 IA.16.050: a. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. b. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-ot~way. c. If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. d. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the County has adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. e. The species of trees shall be approved by DDES if located within the right-of-way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. f. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by ODES prior to engineering plan approval. g. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DOES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. A landscape inspection fee shall also be submitted prior to plat recording. The inspection fee is subject to change based on current County fees. 20. The following have been established by SEPA as necessary requirements to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of this development. The applicants shall demonstrate compliance with these items prior to final approval. L03TY403 & L03P0006 Liberty Grove Individually, or joint with other area developers, the Applicant shall design and construct improvements to Southeast 128th Street at 160 1h Ave. SE to mitigate project impacts at the High Accident Location. Or, the Applicant shall reduce the project impacts at the High Accident Location by completing the remainder of the improvements to Southeast 136th Street (i.e. additional paving, concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks), between 158th Avenue SE and 160th Avenue SE, and, revise the channelization at the intersection of 156th Avenue SE/SE 136th Street to provide a southbound left tum lane. School Mitigation Fees Page 18 21. Lots within this subdivision are subject to King County Code 21 A.43, which imposes impact fees to fund school system improvements needed to serve new development. As a condition of final approval, fifty percent (50%) of the impact fees due for the plat shall be assessed and collected immediately prior to recording, using the fee schedules in effect when the plat receives final approval. The balance of the assessed fee shall be allocated evenly to the dwelling units in the plat and shall be collected prior to building permit issuance. School Walkways 22. The applicant shall construct an off-site walkway to Liberty High school from the site. The walkway shall be constructed within the right-of-way from 160th Ave SE, east along SE 135th St. to 166th Ave SE, and south to Liberty High School at SE 136th St. The walkway shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the 1993 King County Road Standards and shown on the engineering plans for ODES review and approval. Alternatively, if access improvements are made from and through the plat of "5 Lot Subdivision"/LOOP0023 to the southwest gate of Liberty High School, the applicant may choose to instead complete school walkway improvements on 162nd Ave. SE to the sidewalk improvements "5 Lot Subdivision". Any surfacing alternative from the King County Road Standards (KCRS 3.09) may be submitted for approval through a road variance application. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: 1. The subdivision shall conform to KCC 16.82 relating to grading on private property. 2. Development of the subject property may require registration with the Washington State Department of Licensing, Real Estate Division. 3. Preliminary approval of this application does not limit the applicant's responsibility to obtain any required permit or license from the State or other regulatory body. This may include, but is not limited to the following: a. Forest Practice Permit from the Washington State Dept. of Natural Resources. b. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit from WSDOE. c. Water Quality Modification Permit from WSDOE. d. Water Quality Certification (401) Permit from U.S. Army Corps of Engineers REPORT ATTACHMENTS: 1. 24 Lot Plat Layout 2. Density Calculations for development with density credit transfer 3. Issaquah School District 4. Certificate of Water Availability, January 8, 2003 5. City of Renton Letters, including Sewer Certificate 6. Transportation Concurrency TRANSMITTED TO PARTIES LISTED HEREAFTER: BORBA.GREG CURRENT PLANNING SUPERVISOR DDES / LUSD MS: OAK -DE-0100 BOWEN, WILLIAM J. BOWEN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 13644 160TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98055 BOWEN, WILMA J. 13644 160TH A VE SE RENTON, WA 98059 BRENDEN. MARSHALL 18225 SE 128"' RENTON, WA 98059-8732 CLAUSSEN, KIM SR. PLANNER DDES / LUSD MS: OAK -DE-0100 DMP !NC. MEL DALEY 726 AUBURN WAY NORTH AUBURN, WA 98002 GILLEN. NICK WETLAND REVIEW DDES / LUSD MS: OAK -DE-0100 GRAVES, KATHY 13020 160TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 HERRIN. BRAD & JULIE 16202 SE 137TH PL RENTON. WA 98059 HIGH, GWENDOLYN 13405 158TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 HIGH, MS. GWENDOLYN PO BOX 2936 RENTON, WA 98056 LAKERIDGE DEVELOPMENT INC WAYNE JONES PO BOX 146 RENTON, WA 98057 LANGLEY, KRIS LAND USE TRAFFIC REVIEW DDES / LUSD MS: OAK -DE-0100 LEE. MILTON & HELEN PO BOX 2574 RENTON, WA 98056 LIND, REBECCA CITY OF RENTON EDNSP DEPT. 1055 S. GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98055 NASS, LEROY 15713 SE 128TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 NELSON, KATHY L03TY403 & L03P0006 Liberty Grove Page 19 ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT, TRANSPORTATION DEPT. 805 2ND AVES. ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 OORD, LARRY & SUSAN 16013 SE 136TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 PLATT, DA YID & GEORGIA 510 E. PANORAMIC DRIVE CAMANO ISLAND. WA 98282 PLATZ, GUY 13535 160TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 RESIDENT 13020 160TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 ROGERS, CAROL CURRENT PLANNING SECTION DDES I LUSD MS: OAK -DE-0100 ROMANO, MICHAEL J. CENTURION DEVELOPMENT SVCS 22617 8TH DR. SE BOTHELL, WA 98021 SCHARER, KAREN PROJECT PLANNER DDES/LUSD MS: OAK -DE-0100 SEATTLE KC HEALTH DEPT. E. DIST. ENVIRON. HEALTH 14350 SE EASTGATE WAY BELLEVUE, WA 98007 STEWART, DEBORAH J. 16207 SE 136TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 THATCHER, JESSE 13817 162ND AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 TOWNSEND, STEVE LAND USE INSPECTIONS DDES/LUSD MS: OAK-DE-0100 TULL, MIKE 16056 SE 136TH ST RENTON, WA 98059 WEST, LARRY DDES /LUSD GEO REVIEW MS: OAK -DE-0100 WHITTAKER. BRUCE PRELIMINARY REVIEW ENGINEER DDES I LUSD MS: OAK -DE-0100 WILMOT. BOB & LYNN 13900 160TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 WYMAN, KEVIN M. 16540 SE 149TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 ZIMMERMAN, GREGG CITY OF RENTON PLANNING 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98055 OLIPHANT, ANITA & RICHARD 16519 SE 145HTH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 JUNE, EDWARD & KRIS HILL 13527 156TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 KEZELE. DON & DIANE 15657 SE 137m PL. RENTON, WA 98059 BUCKETT, MRS. CAROLYN ANN, 16524 SE 145m ST. RENTON, WA 98059 0 co 0::: in(!) 8~ 0 0::: a.. w (!) M C:C z 0-~N-..J ...I ) ~~~w ::,..-h-_..,,.....+.~ • ...,....,~ffl1'91"1"'~..,..,.~t-...-~ __,..r-M'"M"~t ---'~~-___ c._/__J~LL.-tL-Q..-: -l=t=:i-1~~~ ... ~ .... ~~ ~~~l ATTACHMENT I --'----? z. ,-PAGE OF--;::~- PAGE ~ ~ 'l ~ " ~ 'l:'"""' ~.s~ ..::J ---, I L, I SFR / L __ ..,__J 30• /ef' ./ ;---------, .I I I SFR I I I I I L_ I l. __ .J ___ _J ----- 1_?.-,/ / / - 11 ..... / j ... • 13/ I I 10·· I I {,SP-3 I /14 I / - / / 126' /~/ I I - w (!) <( _, "1(1_ LL 0 I w (!) 10 ..... ,---_r-1 I SFR I 1 -1 1 I ,---, 1 1L---i_ __ j I 11 I ,--1 I I I SFR I L __ J r-, I I I I I I I I L_...J ~II L __ _J L_J -:5'-i;HAtN""tll« n:rqcr--.. ,rl15' 95··= ---49 'io ~ •L 7 "' ... 1·.o·o TO BE REMO~ / '6>';:Jc MENT ~ •~~ ---,, «&,.,,,l·. •· RE . ~o._6505240859 1--_ ~ -<94---,.·· " .. ~_., : .. · • TO..f!E ABANDONED- .. DRIVE> I c ,a / 75' . ; 82' \ L 'li __ 0,_1~---- 9 0 "' 98' TRACT'B'l7 i6 82' --REC. ~N OPE~" ~ --------~A'CE • 8 "' -9,;IBO SQ. FTJu>. ------------ I I / 1a 1 \ •I& I --.1 r / 85' 75' I 82' 26' / ~ / / • ~ 397' ~~-=j ~ 60' I 60' ) l t 60' e -'8:-'22-,_ .,.. ' -~ / 1~ 2086-i&---21 ---.., _-$ I 1 60' I §.O' I §.(!' o PO I --00--<er---Jl(!' I 65' ---~= SE.-...... ST.=-"-~---/(m,r OP;N) -----ii,\;"',, --( ---,1-'iJ, 1 '?:i 4 1 ----482"" r--..._ I '..._ I 'J (. l. ) SFR ' l. .......... ..... . ..... .J r--, I t. I I I L __ I SFR L ____ _ A / '\ /'\ < v" ' \. SFR '\ / '\ / V • •• ' . -. • ATTACHMENT Z l OF Z ~P~A~G=E-PAGE ® ""'-Dq:.tnionl ofDevdqpm,,,,t.m:I t.od. u. s.n... J>b1lloa 9000...WiA-~ Sili,ifivlslon Density · ·· · .. and ;DlminsJQn Calculations ff",1 . ~matlve fonnats available It-. w~ 9805s-12l9 l. (l(l6J2~ TrY(100J2%-1211 Dap0 Q upon request \ RECEIVE:!) SEP O 3 20C OP II (To be filled In by DDES) KING COUNTY IAMl"\11r.-~ --1sD1VBf1 LQlPQQQt • 0-Pffl403) FhNumber I PREUMINARY SU~ON WORJCSHEET RELATING TO DENSITY AND DIMl!NSIONSI Several development regulations play a role In the oeatlon r:K a subdivision wlttW1 King County. DetE!rmlnlng the allowable density, minimum density, and a lot width on a piece r:,f property can be coofusfng, This worksheet: wil assist you In correctfy applying specific po111oos of the code and will be used to determine If a proposed subdMsloo or short subdMsion meets the -and dl"""""'1s """""°"' ol tlle ~ng COUnty Zoning Code (Tltje 21A). Th• --• designed to.-appjlcants and ·c1oes oot ,eplace OJrn'lp!laoo! With adopted local, state and federal laws. Pre-appleation oonferences are required prior to submittal of a rutxivlslon or short sutdlvislon, These co.,faa.ces help to dartfy Issues and answerQUestions. They may sav& you both time and money by ellmlnatlng delays resultlng (rpm requests for addlHonal Information and revisions. You may caU (206) 296-6600 to ftnd out 00.V to arrange ror a pra-appllcatlon conference. - Byl Harnt KqyP Worbheet (f'rfntNdme) .Dab!: 04/2B/Q3 SUbdlvislon Name: LJbffl:tv Gmve PrePro[fliVY Pk!t CB-4 Optfnn WI IPR) ::,i::;; :0 ~ ~prehen~ve Plan Land Use Designation: tJrhan Resfckenttal B-4 tn 8·12 ~-i ~ ~"'9L...Bd!.. 'R-40ptlonw/TDR (") • ~ .::::lir more than one Comprehensjve Plan Land use designation or zone dasstflcatlon exists 0 • Z,,. the property, show the boundary between the land uses or zones and the area within § ~ oo the prellmlnary plat map. If a Single lot Is divided by a zone boundary, q transferring density across zones on that lot may be permitted subject to the provlslOns X of K.C.C. 21A.12.200. !-....... _ .... g.. ......... lHldiona ...... fpnp Sita Atw CK C.C. Zl& 01U17Zl atlP"'OC.c:& .ll& 12..QftO\; I Site area (Jn square feet) Is the ~ horizontal area of the project Site, .a submefged lands as defined by K.C.C. ZIA.06.1265, and .le:i:i areas which are reqund to t>e • dedicated on the pe11.-cl a proJ,ct.,. for the pu,l]c rights-of-way. ~ _..,,___ square feet In submerved·land (any land below the ordinary h1gli water mark-see K.C.C. 21A.06.825) + -.JL_ 9quare feet ln perimeter rights-of-way whid'I will be required to be . dedk:ated (area 30 feet from center nne of road) ___a__ Total * Al existing ~·111141'.NIIIIIISQ'l~ ~-GrMR-4~W/TDR Page I of6 calculation: 210JPO Gross honzontal area of the project site ~~-Total submerged lands and rights-of-way 210439 Site: area 1n S1Quare feet NOTE: ro contlNJe cakulatlons.. convert site area lh sqoare feet to acres by dividing by 43,560 .1&L_ Site area In aaes NOTE: When calculatlng the site area for parcels In the RA Zone. If the site area should result In a fraction of an acre, the folowlng shall appy: Fntettons of .50 or above shall be rounded up to the next whole number aOO fi"actlons below .so shaD be rounded down. Example: If the site area In acres IS 19.5 acres (less the submerged land and less the area that Is. required to be dedlcated.oo the i:iertmeter of a proJect .,. for publ< ,tght4"'y) the site .,.. can be rounded up to 20 acns. No further rounding Is allowed. ~ K.C.C. 21A.12.080) n. IMI Pm,lty CK.C: C. 216-12 039-,Q4Q lahfOllt •. The base demtty 1$ determined by the zcne deslgnations(s) fa' the lot. B ~ 4 oo/acre * Not Including lOR m. AUowabft PMIQl·Uolb Ind BRYfflln (IC.C.C. llA.12.QZQ); 'The base number of dwelling units IS caleufated by muttfplylng the site ar&i by the base density In <fv..te!Ong units per acre {from K.C.C. 21A.12.030 -.040 tables). ..ilL site a... In aaes (see Sedlon 1.) X---L... base density (see Sedlon II) 19 allowable dwelHng units Except as noted below, when calc:ulatlons result In a fraction, the fraction Is rounded to the nearest whole number as follows: A. Fra<;:tloos of .50 or above shal be rounded up; and B._ Fractions below .50 shaTI be rot.nded down. NOTE: For parcels In the RA zone, no rounding 1$ allowed when calculattng the allowable number Ctl dwelllng u,lts. For example, If the calrulation of the number of dwellklg units equaled 2.75, the result woukl be 2 dwelllng units. Rounding up to 3 Is oot -· (See K.C.C. 21A.!2.D70(E)). rv. BMulNd 9o:Ette BmMJtpn err Oc.(,c, U&f4,1BD\r This section ITlJSt: be ct>Jr1)leted orly If the proposal IS a resldentlal deYelqJment If more than fotr dwelling units In the UR and R zones, stand-alone tDwnnouses In the NB zone on ~ 1111d llTnlS*1 tlkiJIUCnl utety Gnlft 1H Opltti wJ Ttlll Pige2 of6 property designated commercial OUtslde of center If more than four units, or any mlXed use deirefopment If more than four units. Reaeetkln space must be computed by multlplylng the recreation space requirement per unit type by the proposed rNmber of such dwelling units (K.C.C. 21A.14.180). Note: King County haS the discretion to accept a fee 11'1 lleu of all or a portion of tJ,e reqtired recreation space per K.C.C. ZlA.14.185. Apartments and town houses developed at a density ~ than eight units per acre, and mbcad use must prcwlcle reaeatk>nal space as follows: 90 square feet X __ propo$lld nunar d studb ind one bedroom units ~"'~--- 170 square feet X __ ~ number r:A two bedroom units + 170 square feet X __ proposed nW'tlber of Uln,e or !TKn! bedroom units + ~ ba9l:b'I ~ reQunment Resldentlat subdivisions, townoouses and apartments ~ at a density d eight units or less per ace must provide recreatlonal space as Uows: 390 square teetx .J!___' Jl'oposed number ct units 390 SQUare reet" x ~ propased number rA units, lndlldlng TDR Mobile home parks shaR provide recreat!Onal space as l'ollows: 250 square feet x __ proposed number d untts V, Net: BulkWde Are CK.C.C. 21A.D§.ZW; 1.fil j,l!ll_ NA lhls section ls use:! for computing minimum density and must be completed on)' If the site • IOcated In the R-4 tluough R-48 """'5 and designated Urban by the K>,g County Comprehensive Plan. The net buldable area Is the Site area (see Section I) less the following areas: _o___ fflliS ldbin a projin • which are requ!reJ tu be dedicated for public rt,l'lls<t-way In ext!SS d 51:dy {60') dWlclth + _o ___ sensnwe araa alld their buffers, tt> tt,e e:tent: lMf are required lPf King County to -·-+ _o ___ aias required ror -.-e ground stDrmwat!r contro1 l'aclwes lndl.dn;, but not ~mlted to, ~ ponds, blofttratbl swales and 9!tbad!s rrom sud1 pond$ and sw*5 -1-_Lill!__ ams required tFi ~ County IIO be dedicmd or ,aer,,,:I as orKtre reaeatx:in areas. Deduct area Mltlln stonnwatar c:ontrol rdlly If reqlll!Stlng tt!C'eiltlofl space aeott as allowsl tFi K.C.C. 21A.14.U:O (see Sdon IV) + ___ regional utlllt)' comtbs, and + ---,r;ths arus. edldlng setbacb, reqund or king County to remain un<leYelQped "' ~ Total mluctions calwlation: 210 830 site 11rea In square feet (see Sedlon1) .1J1!__ Total redlldlons • 203,420 Net bllldabll area In square feet NOTE: convert $lb! area Is square feet IIJ acns trr dhlk1I~ by 43,560 ) .. 4.7 Ntt bulldatle arH In ams 4.6 Nd:bl.liklal*aree lnacreslnducllnglDR (_'?OLI:. Ji ,~...J.. ~ il\CI Clllllllllan Cllailticn llisty GflM R-4 CJpiDrl W/"TDR PIOl3ol'6 ATTACHMENT 2,. Z OF 2.. PAGE PAGE vt. Minimum Uman Brt1ffltlal Pffllltx CK.C.C. 21A.1ZQOD); The minimum density requirement applies .Qlltt to the R-4 through R"48 zones. Minimum density ts detamlned by multlplylng the base density In dwellk}g units per acre (see Sectk>n ll) b',' the net bulklable area of the stte tn acres (see Section V) and then mutlplytng the resulting i:,odud: by the minimum density percentage from the-K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table. 1he minimum density requirements may be phased or waived by King County h1 certain cases. (See K.C.C. 2IA.12.060.) Also, the minimum density requirement: does not apply to properties toned R-4 located within the rural town of Fall aty. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.030(B)12.) ca10.llat1on: HA 4 base densly lf1 dufaC (see Section II) X ~ Ne: ~ area In acres (991! Section V) "' ~ X minimum density% set forth In K.C.C. 21A.12.Q30 a as adjusted In section VII :a ------+',a-ldnmlm dwelllnQ units required vu. Nini mum PtMJty AdtlflbDMII 1gr '1octw:ltP Smn CK &C. 21A.12.DBZl; Resldentlal developments In the R-4, R-6 and R-8 zones may modify the minimum density fac:tgj' In K.C.C. 21A,12.030 based on the weightB:I average sloped the net bullclable area of 1he stte (see Section V). To determine the weighted average sklpe, a topographic survey Is required to calculate the net bulk:lale area(s) Within each rt the following slope Increments and then multlplylng the ~mber of square feet In eadi slope Increment try the meclan slope value of each slope lna-ement as ~ _NA __ sq. ft o-5% slope 1Jla'effl151t X 2.5% median slOpl!I Wille = ~ • ___ sq. fl: 5-10% slope increment x 7 .5'% meo:lan slope valt,e : + • ---sq. fl: 10-15% !ilope lnaement X 12.5% median slop!! wlue -+ • ---sq,lt15-2-0%slope~X17.S%medan51opevalue= + • ---sq. fl:20-2S"lbslopelnaement:X22.S% ITM!danslopeW~= + • ___ sq.lt25-30%slope!naWnentX27.S%medanslopeWluez + • ___ sq. ft 30-35'% slope lncnmerf; X 32.5% median slope value "' + • ___ sq, lt35-40"!'o slopelncremertX37.5% medllln sk:Jl)l!value -+ ___ Tatat square feat . Total squall!! feet In net. bulldable area act:tusted for slope cakulatlon: _NA __ total square I'm .tjusted for slol)f, dMded ~ tuml squ11re feet In net bulldable 11rea ___ weight8d ilWf'IDe slope of net bulldable area ---% {Nola: mdtlply by 100 ti:i Oll'lll'elt to pertent-n:m:I ~ ti:i nearest whole percent) Use the table below to determine the minimum d!wity fac!Dr. 1h15 density IS substituted for the rmllmum densltt factcN' k1 K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table when calOJlatlng the minimum density as shown In Section VI Of thiS wortcsheet weighted Average Slope C, Net Bt.ildable Arears) of Sib!: Minimum Density FactDr 0% -less than 5% 85% 5% -less than 15% 83%, less 1.5% each 1% of In excess of 5% 15% -less than 40% 66%, less 2.0% for each 1% Of In excess of 15% DenSR,oww;IWnlt'<IIOII~ UNty Gl'OYt MOpl!c,II w/ TDk PIOt4af6 EXAMPLE CALQJLATION FOR MINIMUM DENSITY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MODERATE St.OPES: ---sq. rt G-5% slope Increment X 2.5% median slope value .. __ + .J.MQ!)__ sq. rt S-10%, !i1ope lncrenent X 7.5% ll'lelflall slope value '" 1SO + + ..1QJ1QQ__ sq. ft 10-1514 slope lncrementX 12.5% rnetlenslopeYalue.. 2 500 + + sq, It 15-20% slope Increment X 17.5% median slopeYlllue a:: + , ---sq, lt2Q-2S'ltii 90l)elriawnentX22.5% median slope value= + + == sq, lt25-30'lbslopeincrementX27.5%medlan slope value.. + • ___ sq, It 30-35% stope lntmnent X 32.5% mdan slope: Y8lul! "' + • ___ sq.lt.35-40%slopl!lncrernent:X37.5%medlanslopeva1Ue• + ...M!J!QQ___ TIX;II sqUillre feet 3,250 Total square felt' In net bulldable 111'1!:B adjum:d for slope ~ Tobi ~ feet adjtmd for slope dMded ~ 30,000 Tot.I ~ feet ir. net bulldable area .. .108.333 Wdghmt ll'Yel"l'iJI!! slope dllet bulldal!le aru .. ~ {Note: mvltlptf b'f 100 to coovertto peicent-round up to nearest whole perunt} Using the table abo'llet oiln 11% ~ted average slope of net buildable area falls within the 5% -less than 15% range which has a mlntmum density factor of 83%, less 1.5% for each 1% of average slope ln excess d 5%, Since 11% Is 6% atxwe 5%, multlpfy 6 times 1.5 which would equal 9%. subtract 9% from 83% ftw' an adjusted minimum density factor or 74%. 1h15 replaces the mntmum density factor In K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table. VIU, Mtndnunn DweQlng Uobl AHowal CK.C.C. 21A.12Jl30 • ,040); Thlsse<:tlon -~ be complet,d °"'Y•ttie--appi<:atlon"_, .. ,. density I""""""' (K.C.C. 21A.34) or-of-,tghts (K.C.C. 21A.37). Maximum density Is. calrulated by adding the boous or transfer untts authorized to the base units calculated In sectiOn m of this worksheet. The maximum density permitted through reslclentlal density Incentives IS 150 percent of the t:ese density (see Section ll) rA the undertflng zoning of the clevelopment or 200 percent of the base de1Slty ftt proposals with 100 percent affordable units. The maxtrrwm density permitted through transfer of density rights-Is 150 percent of the base density (see Section ll) of the underfylng zoning of the -· ~ base densily ln dwelllnO units pet aae see (Secllon D) X 150% • mmdrl'l.lm dl!I\Slty maximum density In dWellnO units II« acni X sb are In Kn!! ., ___ _ rnPimwn (iwldlng unit$ akMer:I utRlzlng ~ ll'ICelltlVes (K.C.C. 21A.3'4) _M__ bi1Se density In dwelling unJls pet acre {see section D) X 200'Yo .. maximum dfslSlty ___ n'lllldn1\m densily In dwellng unit!I pet aae X ___ sllle 11rea In acres= .~~~~ maxfmUm dwelling unltS &lowed utl&zlng density lncflntNe!l With 100 ~.t'ordable units (K.C.C. 21A.34) -•--base density In dwelling unl\li per litre (see Sectkll'l ll) X 150%, c: 15 ITIIIXlmum densty e mltldmum dfl'lsty In dwl!ll'lg unlls per acre X 4.14 stte 11ree In acres = 0 29e_ __ _ maJdmum dlwllng unlls allowm utlllzlng density bilnsfers (K.C.C. 21A.31) °""'-' _,. ___ base allowable dwelllng units calaet!d In 5edlon m ~ bon"'6 units iUl:hotlZed by IC.CC 21A.34 + I transl'8' unls tlllhoftzed by K.C.C. 21A.37 _,. ___ total dwalb;I units (carKKJt i!XCeeCI rna:drnum calculDd ibove) IX. Mlqlmum Lot A,-Fgr o;,ne, d n CK.<:&-21A,12.:LDD); Except M proYkled for nonconformances In K.C.C. 21A.32: ,, ~ and Olll'll!ftllon Clkualloos L.t.ty GnM 1H Opl;IOll w/ TllP. ,.sco X. A. In the UR and R zones, no a:iostructlon shall be permJtted oo a lot that contatns an area of less Uwl 2,500 square feet or that does not comply" with the appllcable minimum lot width, except for townhouse developments, zero- lot-llne subdlYlslons, or lots created prior to February 2, 1995, In a recorded .subdMslon or short subdMslon which oom~ wfth applicable laws, and; B. In the A, F, or RAZ~: 1. Construction shall not be permitted on a lot containing less than 5,000 square feet; and 2. c.onstructlon shall be limlted to one dwelllng unit and resldentfal accessory uses tor lots containing greater than 5,000 square feet. but Jess than 12,500 square feet. (K.C.C. 21A.12,100) LQt WkfV! nc.c.c. 2u.12,01PW>; Lot widths shal be measured by scaling a drde of the apl)llcable diameter within thE! boll'ldarles of the lot as shown below, provided than an aa:.ess easement shall not be lnducled within the drde. (See K.C.C. 21A,12.0S0), i----;,~~o, --- LOt\!lldtlrH-..,wnent Dtr!lltf WICI ~ Clli,JallCn ~Grwall-4°'*"1 r,/ffil Page 6 cf6 • • King County Depc. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, WA 98055· 1219 DATE: March 27, 2003 TO: Issaquah School District, ATIN: ___ _ FM: Kim Claussen, Project/Program Manager Ill ·~ RE: Proposed Plats of Liberty Grove & Liberty Grove Contiguous & Rezone Request_ LUSD File Nos: L03P0005, L03P0006 & L03TY401 The Land Use Services Division (LUSD) has received an application for a subdivision in your District. Enclosed is a copy of the plat maps received by the Land Use Services Division on March 11, 2003. In order for us to adequately evaluate this proposal, provide the most accurate information to the public, and for LUSD to serve the School District better, please provide us with the following information: Which schools do you anticipate the students living in this subdivision would attend? Jr. High/Middle ('(' · ·u ' J JC i . , ;, S H. h ·~ -----\....! I ·,, . . r. 19 __ .,_....1..,::1,,~\..s.(:·...,_ ___ --..-, ·-..... ~-'-• .,_, -i-----'--'-1-'-'""·,._..:._I--'------- l, .. fill th students walk or ,be bussed lP these schools],1 . . / oJ!L-&;a iJ Elementary by $ ~ -(._J.,t,U' ,-v U-.,... S7(../< tv ,._,t/c: ,~ S !AW c;,P:ftt,1. Jr.High/Middle /nr.1W ch.-e ~ LA...~ ?v#fK t.Jr f ,-___ ,1., w · . I ,.; / f\:J. s( g,,. 1 :.e, .(\fa Sr. High prt 5 >.eel ...__ LJ,(,,<..,{ ru {~ iv /f{K t,v't"~ /':'1 £ ,µ \ 1 f; ~f ie students will be bussed, where do you anticipate the bus stops will be locate~. If that information is not fv• q__~f . available at this time, currently, where are the clos_est bus 1 sto_p~ lpcated to this site? 1 L u.,,.,, s .,_ .J,,. , ;of u -di /5l,'<P.At,a.,; ~ QI s t,, 4 3'l121 /l,()-d,f1,,P.5t.<i's~, dhul. ro v'--" S · ..{Elementary /'Sb-0045 t,@ 5 'i'.( ?12.fl',t,s, 14:)"'j&es· t.@ StJ':tl~"' !¢<.,,/~ 'i:/YIJ 1'1 -r·· ~Jr.High/Middle /bl..''1!t flv..P ,; 'c @ S· t-I 30--rh E,1 -,;;gt' AU! Si e ~<i, I 31 &r(JJ <>Je-f: Sr. High f1\f'N?1' J1:,3rd Prtl£ ft. (JJ,, C 'i:. t?O"IJ, fl other Comments: tu/J?v,.. / 6 tJ +A ~ SE ~ (:t., h--g{e .Cu ?f /K h ~ ~ ;lY, X:SS:!j t~d( .il s-fr-,' c f--iv, I( /r; o K ?L f /7 /lzlory s'-11 {Ad_ J . /_ -f-s/ /s.J &f:. f; Cr W 5 5 lv,e cic:L /ZeflA/ II£ t' 17 L <t--SE/ i,L-{,( ) 1 5'-h th-1/s/tk ¥' ra<l,r,(rPz;k fit,h 7 jp r, 1--rWVU Cl f=. /.P~r,,.I?-,,, r';J '[/_ we C:v, ,€ e Ci!,/,/-{' :5 H-01</> ~ Please complete this form and return it--6y A rll 30, _003 to the address below. If you have questions 7v, ;_ / ,:, '< S.t> " c,, regarding these proposals, please call me at (206) 296-7167. Thank you. '-11~ 51-t,.£,z,_;/J' / .. . . Y. ~ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services ..,3 Exhib~~~'"l02(..Land Use Services Division ATTACHMENT ___ _ ~ .5--,a~qY'. ATTN: Kim Claussen, Project/Program Manager Ill I I King County Heartng Examieeo Oakesdale Avenue Southwest PAGE OF PAGE Renton, WA 98055-1219 , //_ ')(. L/ J-12.r ch_ /-/;, If, ~ )t' ~ V frly µJu d }'}1, r/CI K Y? S~;u/ w ~ Sf,. 14/s-&v1 I/ 17 ): 11!f t1=1e t,JJI-/ k. t/J~S,1 /j 5' tv.e-j/ g-160 /lv--f SF Jtw DY--.. Se/!./ I/ Sr As sfr{e w!!-/1< w,./'S Form96/SPRS/ReqSchol.Inf clc 1/6/2000 Feb-11-03 04:Z2P Lakeridge Oevelopment @ King County ODES DEPARTMENT OF DEVB.OPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Wa 9805S·1219 4Z5 228 7232 This certificate provides the Seattle King County Department of Pubil'c Health eind the Department of Deverapmont and Environmental SeNlces with Information necessary to evaluate development proposa!:s. King County Certificate of Water Availability [ Do not write in. this box. numbc,__r __ _ 0 Building Permit § Preliminary Plat or PUD D Short Subdivision a Rezone or other __ _ Applicant's name: lakerjdge Qtye\gpmgaj WS\IOe )ROM Proposed use: Single Farrilly Res.~ Locabon: l36'o< 160 SE -name_---~ (attach map and legal descrlpti,n if necessary) Water purveyor information: K.C. D.D.E.S l. a a. Wat!!r will be PfVVided by servfce connection only 10 iln existing 8" (size) water main that is tmnting the site. 1. 3. 4. ~ b. Water service will require an Improvement to I.he vo·atcr systern of; ~ .. OR D b, fig •• OR D b. p<j .. OR O (1) feet of water maln to reach the sit~; and/or D (2) ihc construction _of a distribution system or the sita; and/or ~ (3) Other (dcr~be): off site Improvements on 160' required, also easements and on site improvements required. DE is required. The water system is in conforrmmce with a County a~roved water comprehensive p!tm, The wijter system improvement Is not In confurm.a11ce with a County appr0ved water comprehensive plan and will require a water comprehensive plan amendment. (This may cause a de!uy in issua.nci: cf a permit or i!pproval). Toe proposed project Is within the corporam limits of U'le district. or has been granted ~unclary Ftevicw Board approval for extenslon of service outside the dlsb'lct or dty, or is within the County approved servla! area or a private water purveyor. Annexation or Boundary Review Board (BRB) apprcval will be nece5sary to provide.service. Water ls or~ available at the rate <:I now and duration Indicated below at no less than 20 psi measured at the nearest rire hydrunt 60' feet from the bullding/proparty {or es marked on the attached map): Rate oFDow at Peak Derm,nd Cl less man 5-00 gpm {approx. D 500 tO 999 gpm ~ 1000 gpm or more O flow test of 0 calculation or gpm) gpm gpm Duration O le::;:s than 1 hou, Cl 1 hour to 2 hours Iii! 2 how; or more D other (Note: COmmerc1ar builditlg permits which indude:; multiramily structures requim flow test or calculatlon.) Cl b. Waler system is not capilble of proYiding fire flow. 5. ~ a. water system has certificates of water right or water right clalms sufficient to provide service. OR o b. Water system docs not currently have necessary Weiter rights or water right dalms. Comments/conditions: GEC $3,200,00 per lot. Water AvaHabi!ity eat~~ lot Meter Proo $450,00 each. FEES SUBlECTTO CHANG! WJTHQUT PRJQR NOTICE I certify that the above water purveyor Information Is true. ThJs cetJfication shall be valid for 1 year from date of signature. l(JNG COUNTY WATER DlSTR!CT #90 LES!cR PlELE RENEWAL FEES; WI IN 1 YEAR $,MQ Agency name Signatory nar;~ ~ YEAR $125 OQ ~ k' ~ 11osMA1f,/ F!'l_r:, SUPERINTENOENi 11tle Slgna~ Date ,, Ii; Copy C:\My Documents RecepUon\Water Availabllity\Lakericlg~\wayne jones.doc ATTACHMENT~-"'i-'--_ I OF I ~-PA~G~Ecc--PAGE Exhibit No. _f~·.;...i~- ltem No. LA!:>'3 ° ~~~ Received 6< -/o-9{._ King County HearinO Examiner l(fi i I ir • J i ;· J; G) m•- 0 .•l ~/<,J m );, --1 ~ 0 ::r: s: m z ,--1 \t' ·:,e ·JDiio= Mayur April 17, 2003 Wayne Jones Lakeridge_ Development . P.O. Box 146 Renton, WA 98057 CITY, j>F RENTON Planrunl,')luilamg/PublicWmts Department Oreu: Zimmerman P.E.., Admlni1tr.tor . .:.....,. REC'D:APR 21.2003 SUBJECT, SANITARY SEWER AVAILABILITY -LIBERTY PLAT KCPID 145750--0085 & 0090, 366450--0141 SE 160m STREET AND 160m A VENUE SE Dear Mr. Jones: This letter shall serve as noti.fi~On of a one-year extension to youi-original availability provided to you on this project dated April 8, 20Q2.-This availability shall be valid through April 8, 2004. All other conditio~ contained \vi.thin the original availability. and supplemental letter shall apply. regarding this letter, plea'se contact me at (425) 430-7212. r 6J lE rt: IE I 1W IE rrJ' lfl1 MAY O 7 2003 l!dJ L03TY 403 _ K.C. D.D.E;S.@ H:\RlcSys\WWP-WEteWIICI\WWl'-03-0000Corrapoadance·W~ Anil Lilxrty ~~ 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 FILE N T Q N * Thle,-<rrialnom,r,n,cymd-.30'!!,p,e!_M&.IN • Q OP THI: CUJ:Y!. ' . , _.·!fL May6,2003 . DDES"""' Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Solllhwe:5-1 Redton; WA 98055-1219 CITY OF RENTON PlaonmglBuiidii,&'J'ublicWom Dq,artmcnt Gria~.iP.£..~~ l iti_i1iw--_---. •,; .,;._V:!J . . ,.., ,,.... . ~ ·,: v-..c.o.ot.S- -StrBJEcr, -UB&RTY\,ROVE.co,m:<J'uous-LOJPOOOS&LOJT\'401 Deruc Ms. Scharer. Thank you fot the opportunity pf !'eViewing 'arid commenting on this pl'Ojcct proposal. Renton. s Planning/Building/Public Works Department coi;nm.ents are as follows: 1. Water service will be provided ·bf_King.County Water District #90. · Tiiis project hits existing sewer availability from the City. Of RcaUon- 2. The proposed development is within R.entoo's potential amexation area. .Therefore, we req~ that the street improvements (roadway widening and pavetneftt section, curb and gutters, sidcwallcs, street lighti~ etc;) ~City of.Renton standards~ requited for the portion of 160dr, Avenue S.E., 162m Avenue .S.E. and S.E. 13~ Street abutting the- development site. We also reqnesttbat.tbe intemal street system, including right-of-way w:idth. be u:ismned according t~ City ofR¢ntOn standards. Sincerely, ~4:Jj,nn?(~ PlanninglB~il~ublicWorks DepL. cc: Neti""Watts Jena.lftt~ ·-L~Hum$by Sandra.Meyer lOSSSou\h;.,..,Way-Renton.Wuhin~980S, _--~{' * Thto ... ~60,/,fWl'l*'d ...... oo,-,poo{oori-,er . !ifl;HD ·,~_r:tll;~ ·c:u:i'.yi':,, )> "1J/ ~ )> ~ G) fJ (") m :r: s:- 0 m z I,, I~ "1J ~~ J \t\ \ ·~ ~ =-!~~ CI'Ik &F RENTON P!aoning/Building/Pllblic Works Dcpartment Gregg Zlmmermaa P.E., Administn.(or . April 5, 2002 Mel Daley Dl'dP, Inc. 726 Auburn Way North Auburn, WA 98002 SUBJECT, SANITARY SEWER AV All,ABILITY -LIBERTY PLAT 59 LO'J' PLAT -KCPID NO 145750-0085 & 0096, 36645!).-041 LAKERIDGE DEVELOPMENT Dear,Mr: Daley This letter shall supplem~t the sewer availability document for the subject project~ ·April 5, 2002.· Sanitary sewer servici:i is available to this proposed plat. Service will require the extcnsioD. of sewer as follows: a Extensionof~y.2600Iineal" feet1uf12-inchsewet"ma,in in SE 13611, Street from .. .. ' . --152 Avenue SE to 162 --Avenue SE-. .. . . . .. . . a -ExtensiOllof approximately 600 linear feet of 10-mclisewel' main afongtli.tidi'Oiri:age·ortnrs-~· j,roposed plat in l62Dd. AvenllC SE, 800 linear feet o.f 8-incb sewCr main in 16011, Avenue SE,. and 300.linear feet of &-inch sewer maiµ. in 15811, Avenue SE. · a Extensio~ of 8-~ sani~ seWeF-:~-~tJrin the plat to sen:e ~:' p~posed ~ots. a Installation of a city-ovmed sewer lift station at a location to be determined to be pumped up to -the nCW main in SE 13~ Street. This lift station shall.be sized_to incorporate flows from this proposed plat as well as the_ contnlmtory flows fr<?m the basin and flows from Liberty .. ffigh Scl,ool. . The items listed above. assume tfurt pIUject~l C\lJTCDtly under considetation -would.not move forward. The Ci.ty bas current!}' issued seWer avru1abilities to two developmeii.ts that front On SE 13i;d' that, if developd, 17f()t:!d. pcte¢slly_.c~.6e .ieed:f~ilie ~~ h! SE 13£"-Street_ We also are C:um:ntly teviewing ao·appliCB.1:foll that comes from youi' office for a development that froiits on 16:r' Avenue SE., proposed by David Petrie.:. It ~.the',::ity's recommendation that these developmcmts work in partnecllip to help minimize the total amount of facilities required,·· especially lift stations, to serv~ this area. · · Sewer service is subject to the following fUS: · Side S~Pennit System Develoj:imerit Charge East R~ton Special Assessm.ent _District Charge Right.of Way Fee. Right.of-Way Bond King Cowrt:y Permit Fee Plan Review and1nspcction Fees $60 per lot $760 per lot .. $224.52 plus interest, ~ lot $90 . 100% of estimated construction costs l 00% of actual hilµng:s .by King ~ounty · 5% of estimated construction costs ~ ------,o-,-,-So-.-.. -G~,..,-'-,-w-,-,-_-""'_'°_.,_w_ti_hi_••-,-•• -9,-0-,,--'--'---R-E NT 0-N -.UUiAD OF THE CUJI.Vl!: Mel Daley, DMP. Inc. Apnl ,,2002 ... ., f) Sewer service is also subject to_ the following conditions: ,. a All roadway .pavement sections sha11 meet the City's minimum standard of 4-inches of asphalt p,n 6--inches of crushed swfacing top eonrse. a Property ownCI" shall be required to sig_o. a covenant to anot?X document prior to issuance of any sewer-pennits by the City ?fRenton for ~-service. lf you have anY questi-~ns ~-this-letter or ~ailability certifi~te, pleas,e contact me at aw · · Wastewater Utility Supenr~or ~\DlVISl~N.s\unµniS\DOCS\lOOiii.001.219:~:JI ,-' ' ( ... I N· ATTACHMENT~~~ 3 OF 3 PAGE PAGE KingCoUDty Road Services Diviaion Department of Transportation 201 South Jawon Strffl Seattle, WA 9810,t.3856 > - TYPE OF CERTIFICATE l8J ORIGINAL 0 CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATE OF TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY o Specific c~nditions.;,.. described on the reverse side of this 6e~caJ'.. Pursuant to King County Code, Chapter 14.70as amended, this certificate confirms that the level of service siandanl ... used in the Transportation Concurrency Management program has been satisfied and sufficieni road capacity is' !'Cserved for the development project descnbed below. ·. IMPORTANT: This certificate does not guarantee ll 'i)? • · .. devel~pinent permit Other transportation improvements and mitigation W111 be required to comply with Intersection Standards, Mitigation Payment System, King County road standards, and/or safety needs. . ' , I. Applicant Name and Address: WM Wayne .Jones, Jr., lake ridge Development, Inc. PO Box 146, Renton, WA 98057 ' . ·2. Prop' erty. L"-: -, 11· ·~: -·,; .-, .. ; __ ·" ·. , •. · ... · . oca on: .. , . . .. . .. . ..•. 'j'a: Property Address: 13612160th Avenue SE '. -: . : :'b. Development Name:: · <•. · .. < ' ···: · · : ,.,. , , c .. Parccl Nmnber: 1457500085,90;3664500141 Type ~fDe~e10Jmen~P.,;,,;tT0BeRe;~: F~irnal Plat r-.<\:;/._· ':;. _:>-,:.~:; _.,._ :\::"'·:·_-..., .. -:~_;i:<-<0·>:; ., ... : .'')'· f:-~_-__ :_.-_··?:..-.: -· .. ~·,:·· -· · 'Proposed Land Use: Single Family Residential •; ·,"a" • '., ···." ,._,,• •.• -,, '' :·' . • 5.ZoneLoc~tionandRet~.dUnits: \ . :,iJ,; .. . .. . a. ConcurrencyZone: 763 Community Planoing Area: Newcastle i. CommercialProject-TotalSquareFeet: 0 .·· ii. Multi-family-Nmnber of Units: 0 . . m .. Single ,family, Nmnber of Units: 60 , 6. This Certificate is subject to the following general conditions: . · . · . · ·· . , · .> , ' c;. : a .. This Certificate of Concurrency runs with the land and is transferable only to subsequent owners of the same· · property for the stated development, subject to the tonns, conditions and expiration daie listed herein. This . Certificate of Concurrency is not transferable to any other property and has no commercial value. This Certificate Expires: May 23, 2003 ·· . · unless you apply for the development permit described above, prior to that date. If this requirement is not met the King County Deparllnent of Transportation reserves the option to cancel your certificate and capacity .<' -reservation. When yon apply for a development permit with King County's Department of Development and Environmeutal Services (DDES), bring this Certificate of Transportation Concurrency as part of the developme~t application package. If you have any qn .. tions, please call (206) 263-4722. · Linda Dougherty, Manager, Road Services Di\'1Slon Departmeoi of Transportation King County, Washington ATTACHMENT~-~~- 1 OF--=77.' =-=--PAGE PAGE Exhibit No ...... v..__._G:. __ -:-· = l~~fb ~ King County Hearing Examiner King County Department of Development and Environmental Services State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Mitigated Determination Of Non-Significance for Liberty Grove, File No. L03TY403 & L03P0006/ Date of Issuance: Project: Location: King County Permits: County Contact: Proponent: Existing Zoning: Drainage Subbasin: Section/Township/Range: Notes: December 16, 2003 Proposed is a rezone from R-4 to R-6 and subdivision of the 4.6 acre site into 24 lots for detached single family residences and tracts for recreation and drainage facilities. The applicant proposes to use 5 density credit transfers to plat the 24 lots, if the rezone is denied. The site is located north of SE 136'h Street, between 158'h Ave. SE and I 60'h Avenue Southeast Rezone and Formal Plat Karen Scharer, Program/Project Manager II Phone: (206) 296-7114 e-mail -karen.scharer@metrokc.gov Wayne Jones Lakeridge Development PO Box 146 Renton, WA 98057 (425) 228-9750 R-4 Orting Hills subbasin of Cedar River SE 14-23-5 Exhibit No.-..!\~\ _____ _ Item No. L.c.>:s"<:>~ '° Received-~ :l. a -~ King County Hearing Examiner A. This finding is based on review of the project site plan received March 11, 2003 for 24 lots; revised Environmental Checklist, dated September 3, 2003; Conceptual Drainage Plan; Level One Downstream Drainage Analysis, Revised July 11, 2003; Drainage Adjustment, approved December 4, 2003 (L03V0065); Wetland Report by Habitat Technologies. dated November 5, 2002; Addendum Wetland Report, H&S Consulting, July 18, 2003; Traffic Impact Analysis, dated February 7, 2003; and other documents in the file. B. Issuance of this threshold determination does not constitute approval of the permit(s). This proposal will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable King County policies, codes which regulate development activities, including the Uniform Fire and Building Codes, Road Standards, Surface Water Design Manual, and the Sensitive Areas Regulations. C. The density with this plat of 24 lots would yield an average density of 5.2 dwellings per acre (based on the net buildable area). This density requested is within the density range of 4-12 dwelling units per acre as shown on the Land Use Map of the King County Comprehensive Plan. The lots will mostly be 6,000 square feet in area and have a width of 60 feet. MAIN FILE COPY Liberty Grove Rezone & Plat -MD December 16, 2002 Page 2 D. The proposed project will send trips into the intersection of Southeast I 28th Street at 160th Avenue Southeast which has, as of June 2003, been placed upon King County DOT's High Accident Location list (ID: HAL #16). The recommended countermeasure is to construct both east and west left tum channelization at the intersection. These improvement measures are appropriately required prior to King County approving further development that would reduce the level of safety by adding vehicles trips to this intersection. Therefore, due to the additional impacts, mitigation of project impacts at this intersection is necessary and could be accomplished with the recommended road widening and channelization. Alternatively, development impacts could be mitigated and improvements at the intersection could be deferred if another local access route would be provided. The alternative local access route will be at SE 136 1h St. between 1561h Ave. SE and 1601h Ave. SE. As a result of submittal of a major revision of the plat of Evendell, Southeast 136th Street is again proposed to be constructed by the Applicant of Evendell. Their proposed improvements include a 'half-street' improvement opposite the frontage of the proposed plat of Liberty Grove. Completion of the balance of the improvements by this Applicant of Liberty Grove could provide a more attractive alternative route for project-generated trips that would otherwise enter the HAL identified by King County DOT. Typically, absent a direct connection to this roadway, improvements to Southeast 136th Street by the Applicant for the proposed plat of Liberty Grove would not be required as a condition of plat approval. However, by completing the improvements to Subcollector Street (Urban) standards, project-generated trips of the plat of Liberty Grove would have an alternative westbound access (towards the City of Renton) along Southeast 128th Street at the signalized intersection of 156th Avenue SE. Additionally, project-generated trips would have the alternative access to SR-169 from plat-generated trips by use of SE l 36'h Street (in lieu of traveling northbound on l 60'h Ave. SE., making the left tum at the intersection of 128'h Street -the HAL -and another left tum at the l 56'h Ave. SE signal). E. Renton will provide sewer service. Extension ofa 10" or 12" diameter sewer trunk will be located along SE 1361h St. and a sewage pump station will be required off site to provide service. Threshold Determination The responsible official finds that the above described proposal does not pose a probable significant adverse impact to the environment, provided the mitigation measures listed below are applied as conditions of permit issuance. This finding is made pursuant to RCW 43.21 C, KCC 20.44 and WAC 197-11 after reviewing the environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency and considering mitigation measures which the agency or the applicant will implement as part of the proposal. The responsible official finds this information reasonably sufficient to evaluate the environmental impact of this proposal. Mitigation List The following mitigation measures shall be attached as conditions of permit issuance for the plat. These mitigation measures are consistent with policies, plans, rules, or regulations designated by KCC 20.44.080 as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority and in effect when this threshold determination is issued. Key sources of substantive authority for each mitigation measure are in parentheses; however, other sources of substantive authority may exist but are not expressly listed. Liberty Grove Rezone & Plat -MD December 16, 2002 Page 3 Individually, or joint with other area developers, the Applicant shall design and construct improvements to Southeast I 28th Street at l 60'h Ave. SE to mitigate project impacts at the High Accident Location. Or, the Applicant shall reduce the project impacts at the High Accident Location by completing the remainder of the improvements to Southeast 136th Street (i.e. additional paving, concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks), between 158th Avenue SE and 160th Avenue SE, and, revise the channelization at the intersection of 156th Avenue SE/SE 136th Street to provide a southbound left tum lane. Comments and Appeals Written comments or any appeal of this threshold determination must be received by King County's Land Use Services Division prior to 4:30 PM, January 9, 2004. Appeals must be accompanied by a nonrefundable filing fee. Please reference the file numbers when corresponding. Appeals must be in writing and state the perceived errors in the threshold determination, specific reasons why the determination should be reversed or modified, the harm the appellant will suffer if the threshold determination remains unchanged, and the desired outcome of the appeal. If the appellant is a group, the harm to any one or more members must be stated. Failure to meet these requirements may result in dismissal of the appeal. Comment/appeal deadline: Appeal filing fee: Address for comment/appeal: Responsible Official: ~L~//~ Greg Borba, Current Planning Supervisor Current Planning Section Land Use Services Division Date Mailed: December 16, 2003 4:30 PM on January 9, 2004 $250 check or money order made out to the King County Office of Finance King County Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 ATTN: Current Planning Section ic://6/a3 'Date Sigfied <® Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Notice I Hearing, Recommendation & SEPA Decision (SEPA Threshold Determination, Type 3&4) File No.: L03TY403 & L03P0006 Project Name: Liberty Grove DOES Project Manager: Karen J. Scharer 206-296-7114 or e-mail karen.scharer@metrokc.gov Applicant: Wayne Jones Lakeridge Development PO Box 146, Renton, WA 98057 ( 425) 228-9750 Project Location: The site is located north of SE 1361• Street, between 158'" Ave. SE and 1601 • Avenue Southeast Project Description: Proposed is Rezone from R-4 to R-6 and subdivision of the site into 24 lots for detached single family residences and tracts for sensitive areas, recreation and drainage facilities. The applicant proposes to use 5 density credit transfers to plat the 24 lots if the rezone is denied. Permits Requested: Rezone and Subdivision SEPA Threshold Determination: Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) issued December 16, 2003 Department Recommendation to the Hearing Examiner: Deny Reclassification and Approve the Subdivision subject to conditions Public Hearing Date: February 10, 2004 at 9:30 A.M. Location of Public Hearing: DDES, Hearing Room -first floor 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Comment/Appeal Procedure: Comments on this SEPA determination are welcome. This SEPA determination may also be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner. A notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) Land Use Services Division (LUSD) at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on January 9, 2004, and be accompanied with a filing fee of $250. 00 payable to King County Office of Finance. If a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall also file a Statement of Appeal with DDES/LUSD at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on January 9, 2004. The Statement of Appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including the file number) and the alleged errors in that decision. Further, the Statement of Appeal shall state: I) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the Statement of Appeal. Failure to timely file a Notice of Appeal, appeal fee or Statement of Appeal, deprives the Hearing Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Appeals must be submitted to DDES. DDES will issue a written report and recommendation to the Hearing Examiner two weeks prior to the public hearing. Persons wishing to receive a copy should contact DDES/LUSD. Following the close of the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner will issue a written recommendation for the rezone and a decision for the plat which may be appealed to the Metropolitan-King County Council. Appeal procedures will be stated in the Examiner's written recommendation and decision. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact DDES/LUSD at the address and/or telephone number listed. Written comments may also be submitted to DDES. A public hearing as required by law will be held to consider the approval of this application. If the Renton School District announces a district-wide school closure due to adverse weather conditions or similar area emergency, the public hearing on this matter wil1 be postponed. Interested parties will be notified of the time and date of the rescheduled hearing. Any questions regarding postponements and rescheduling can be directed to the Hearing Examiner's Office at (206) 296-4660. DDES--Land Use Services Division Attn: Permit Center 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 December 16, 2003 Date Mailed this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, call (206) 296-6600 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (ITY). ~ If you have any questions regarding the appeal procedures, please contact the planner at the phone number listed ab.ove .. If you requir®e MAIN FILE COP¥ V; AORBA,GREG CURRENT PLANNING SUPERVISOR DDES/LUSD MS, OAK -DE-0100 BOWEN, WILLIAM J BOWEN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 13644 160TH A VE SE RENTON, WA 98055 BOWEN, WILMA J. 13644 160TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 BRENDEN, !vlARSHALL 18225 SE 128TH RENTON, WA 98059-8732 CLAUSSEN, KIM SR .. PLANNER DDES/LUSD MS, OAK-DE-0100 DMP [NC. MEL DALEY 726 AUBURN WAY NORTH AUBURN, WA 98002 GILLEN, NICK WETLAND REVIEW DDES/LUSD MS, OAK-DE-0100 GRAYES, KATHY J 3020 160TH A VE SE RENTON, WA 98059 HERRIN, BRAD & JULlE 16202 SE 137TH PL RENTON, WA 98059 LOJP0005 L03P0005 LOJP0005 L03P0005 L03POOOS L03P0005 L03P0005 LOJP0005 LOJP0005 HIGH, GWENDOLYN 13405 158TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 HIGH, \1S. GWENDOLYN PO BOX 2936 RENTON, WA 98056 LAKERIDGE DEVELOPMENT INC WAYNE JONES PO BOX 146 RENTON, WA 98057 LANGLEY, KRIS LAND USE TRAFFIC REVIEW ODES /LUSD MS, OAK -DE-0100 LEE, MILTON & HELEN PO BOX 2574 RENTON, WA 98056 LIND, REBECCA ClTY OF RENTON EDNSP DEPT. 1055 S. GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98055 NASS, LEROY 15713 SE 128TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 OORD, LARRY & SUSAN 16013 SE 136TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 OORD, SUSAN & LARRY 16013 SE 136TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 L03P0005 LOJP0005 L03P0005 LOJPOOOS LOJP0005 L03P0005 L03P0005 L03P0005 L03P0005 PLATT, DAVID & GEORGIA 510 E. PANORAMIC DRIVE CAMANO ISLAND, WA 98282 PLATZ, GUY 13535 160TH AVE SE REJ\TON, WA 98059 RESIDENT 13020 160TH A VE SE RENTON WA 98059 ROGERS, CAROL CURRENT PLANNING SECTION DDESILUSD MS, OAK -DE-0100 SCHARER, KAREN PROJECT PLANNER DDES/LUSD MS, OAK -DE-0100 STEWART, DEBORAH J. 16207 SE \J6TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 THATCHER, JESSE 13817 (62ND AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 TULL, MIKE 16056 SE 136TH ST REJ\TON, WA 98059 WEST, LARRY DOES ILUSD GEO REVIEW MS: OAK -DE-0100 L03P0005 L03P0005 LOJP0005 L03P0005 L03P0005 L03P0005 LOJP0005 L03P0005 LOJP0005 Wl!ITT AKER, BRUCE PRELIMINARY REVIEW EKG NEER ODES/ LUSD MS, OAK -DE-0100 WILMOT, BOB & LYNN 13900 160TH A VE SE RENTON, WA 98059 WYMAN, KEVIN M. 16540 SE 149TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 ZIMMERMAN, GREGG CITY OF RENTON PLANNING 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98055 L03P0005 L03PD005 L03P0005 LOJP0005 . ' *SEE L03P0005 FOR COMPLETE POR LIST** LOJP0006 2006000040/LOJP0506 BAURICHTER DON :vt 14025 I 76TII AV SE RENTON WA 98059 1457500096/L03P0506 BOWDEN EDWARD & SHARON I 3939 SE I 0TH PL RENTON WA 98058 2006000110/LOJP0506 CACCHIONE SCOTT M 16048 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98056 2006000190/L03P0506 COFFJN RONALD E 16015 SE 135TH RENTON WA 98055 3664500240/L03P0506 CONSERVATIVE BAPTIST CHURCH 13232156THSE RENTON WA 98056 1457500127/L03P0506 DEGOOD RANDALL D 13609 164TH AV SE RENTON WA 98056 3664500136/L03P0506 DUKE JAMES PO BOX 2262 RENTON WA 98056 4306500120/L03P0506 GROVER RAYMOND E+MARYHELEN 16203 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 3664500100/L03P0506 HAMIL TON MARYE 15821 SE 132ND PL RENTON WA 98059 2006000030/L03P0506 HORNER RANDY L+BONNIE 13404 160TH SE RENTON WA 98056 3, _00278/LOJP0506 BECKMAN FRA~CIS J JR BECKMAN ROBIN J 13511 158TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 1457500090/LOJP0506 BOWEN VIRGILE 13644 160TH AV SE RENTON WA 98056 PL50/LOJP0506 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 4306500080/L03P0506 COLLIER JAMES 16235 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98059 2006000060/L03 P05 06 CROONQUIST JOHN E SR CROONQUIST ELIZABETH A PO BOX 2352 RENTON WA 98056 2006000100/L03P0506 DEROUIN JONATHAN W 13421 162ND AV SE RENTON WA 98059 2006000080/LOJP0506 FOSMIRE MICHAEL C+KA YE L 16049 SE 134TH ST RENTON WA 98056 43065001 IO/L03P0506 HAAS MICHELET 1621 l SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98059 4306500010/L03P0506 HERRIN BRADLEY J 16202 SE 137TH RENTON WA 98059 3664500126/L03P0506 JOHNSON GLENDA E 13425 160TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 3 .. _ 00132/L03 P0506 BEHR PATRICK D 15914 SE 134TH PL RENTON WA 98059 2006000270/L03P0506 BURKS JAMES W 16038SE 136TH RENTON WA 98055 PL33/LOJP0506 CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION I 055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 4306500100/L03P0506 COLLIER-KERSTETTER DEBRA+ MICHAELS KERSTETTER 16219 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 2006000140/LOJ P0506 DA VIES ROBERT A & LORI 14708 JOH! NE SEATTLE WA 98126 1457500128/L03P0506 DRAKE TERRY GENE+DAWN MARIE I 6223 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 UAC-FC/L03P0506 FOUR CREEKS UNINCORPORATED · AREA COUNCIL PO llOX 3501 RENTON WA 98056 3664500250/L03P0506 HAIR JARED L+LAURA STAUTZ 13422 156TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500135/L03P0506 HILTON EDWARD W+NANCY J 13414158TH AVSE RENTON WA 98059 2006000260/L03P0506 JOHNSON JOHNNIE M 16046 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98055 14 57 5000701L03 P0506 JOIINSON MORRIS O JR+HOLLY A 2635 REDWOOD ST ANCHORAGE AK 99508 4306500050/L03P0506 KEENE MICHAEL & JENNIFER 16234 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98059 4306500030/L03P0506 KNUTSON ERIC E+KNUTSON MELISSA R 16218 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98059 2006000200/L03P0506 MAGGARD DONALDS 16023 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 1457500126/L03P0506 MCKENDRY JAMES J STEWART DEBORAH J 16207 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 1423059043/L03P0506 MILBRATH DON D 15624 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98055 2006000220/L03P0506 MOELLER STEVEN R 10836 CRESTWOOD DRS SEATTLE WA 98178 2006000280/L03P0506 NASS LEROY 15713 SE 128TH RENTON WA 98056 2006000J60/L03P0506 NORRIS JOHN B+ROSA M 10516 172ND CT SE RENTON WA 98059 1423059009/L03P0506 NYBLOM DA YID A+DEBRA L ALB! 13606158TH AVSE RENTON WA 98059 3 __ .-00 I 331L03P0506 JOHNSON WILLIAM 15902 SE 134TH PL RENTON WA 98059 1423059042/L03P0506 KEZELE DON+D!ANE 15657 SE 137TH PL RENTON IV A 98056 4306500020/L03P0506 LA WR ENCE JOHN 16210 SE 137TH PL RENTON IV A 98055 1423059022/L03P0506 MAIR ROBERT 13606 156TH AV SE RENTON WA 98056 1457500100/L03P0506 MCNAIR DANNY M PO BOX 18914 SEATTLE WA 98118 3664500285/L03P0506 MILL CHARLES V+ CATHERINE M 13434 156TH AV SE RENTON IV A 98059 2006000010/LOJP0506 MUJ-IICH STEVEN C+PERJ A 13420 160TH AV SE RENTON IV A 98059 1457500135/L03P0506 NGUGEN ANN M PO BOX 5111 KENT IV A 98064 3664500127/L03P0506 NOTTDALEH 13422 158TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500270/L03P0506 OSGOODBY ALAN G 13527 158TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 2 JOO i 501LOJP0506 JOI INSTON LEONARD J 16016 SE l35TH RENTON WA 98059 2006000020/L03P0506 KNAPP RICHARD A+M!CHAEL E 13412 160TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 1457500095/L03P0506 LEE STEVEN P 13802 160TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 1457500087/L03P0506 MCDONALD KIMBERLY ANNE 6947 COAL CREEK PKWY SE PMB354 NEWCASTLE IV A 98059 1423059112/L03P0506 MILBRATH DON D 15624 SE 137TH PL RENTON IV A 98056 1457500140/L03P0506 MIYA KEITH L+ANN E 223 BREMERTON AV SE RENTON WA 98059 2006000210/L03P0506 NASS LEROY 15713 SE 128TH RENTON WA 98056 1423059058/L03P0506 NICHOLS MARKE & BARBARA A 13815 160TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500\20/L03P0506 NOTT FLORENCE 15915 SE 134TH PL RENTON WA 98059 3664500281/L03P0506 OSGOODBY BRUCE SHANNON 13456 156TH SE RENTON WA 98055 3664 5'002 80/L03 P05 06 OSGOODBY ELEANOR & VICTOR OSGOODBY BRUCE 13436156TH SE RENTON WA 98056 3590000050/L03P0506 PAPE WARREN KOR SARA 13420 162ND AV SE RENTON WA 98055 3664500260/L03P0506 PERRY LUCILLE M 13426 156TH AV SE RENTON WA 98056 3664500245/L03P0506 PICKENS GWENDOL YN+HIGH VICTOR 13405 158TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500\41/L03P0506 PLATZ GUY E ET AL 13535 160TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 2006000130/L03P0506 ROBERTSON GORDON R+SULTANA 16032 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 SD8/L03P0506 STEVE CRAWFORD, NEW CONSTRUCTION ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT #411 565 NW HOLLY ST ISSAQUAH WA 98027 CG2/L03P0506 SUSAN SULLIVAN 24311 SE 47TH ST ISSAQUAH WA 98029 1457500040/L03P0506 THREADGILL GARRY E 16216 SE 135TH RENTON WA 98055 4306500090/L03P0506 WASSELL MARIANNE L 16227 SOUTHEAST 137TH PL RENTON WA 98059 3J .• 00279/L03P0506 OSGOOD BY JR BRUCE S 13523158THAVSE RENTON WA 98059 1457500086/L03P0506 PAPPAS LONNIE S 16009 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 3664500261/L03P0506 PERRY LUCILLE M 13426 156 AV SE RENTON WA 98055 1457500085/L03P0506 PLATT DA VID+GEORGIA 510 E PANORAMIC DR CAMANO ISLAND WA 98282 1423059IOI/L03P0506 POAGUE JOHN+GEORGJA 15111 SE43RDST BELLEVUE WA 98006 2006000240/L03P0506 SIDEBOTHAM CHRIS G I 6055 SE I 35TH ST RENTON WA 98055 2006000170/L03P0506 STREIT PEGGY ANN 13512 160TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 1457500097/L03P0506 THATCHER JESSE T+ERIN N 13817 162ND AV SE RENTON WA 98059 2006000250/L03P0506 TULL MIKE I 6056 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 2006000120/L03P0506 WEIK DOUGLAS R+CRYSTAL A 16040 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 1 · )00037/L03P0506 PAPE WARREN K & SARA M 13420 162 SE RENTON WA 98055 2006000070/L03P0506 PEELER BARBARA L 16041 SE 134TH ST RENTON WA 98059 4306500040/LOJP0506 PETERSON PATTY A+DAVE L 16226 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 2006000180/L03P0506 PLATZ ERIN D 14627 160TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 SDl3/L03P0506 R. STRACKE, FACILITIES & PLA'i"<ING RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT #403 1220 N 4TH ST RENTON WA 98055 2006000300/L03P0506 SIMONSON REGAN J+BROTII ERTON MARYE 16016 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 20060002901L03P0506 SULT LINDA R I 6022 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 1457500038/L03P0506 THREADGILL G 16216 SE 135TH RENTON WA 98055 2006000050/L03POS06 WAINWRIGHT MICHAEL A+NECIA I 6025 SE I 34TH ST RENTON WA 98059 3590000040/L03P0506 WILLIAMS TERRI R 13421 163RD AV SE RENTON WA 98059 1457500 I Ol/L03P0506 WILMOT ROBERT C+CAROL LYNN 13900 160TH SE RENTON WA 98059 i '.,, ,00088/L03P0506 WOLBERG ALVIN & DIANE 16021 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 3 500 l 3 l /L03P0506 WOOD ALVIN R+\VENDY S 13403 160TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 ,. (E Renton) FD25 (Spring Glen) FD40 Fire Protection Dist #25 Fire Protection Dist #40 P.O. Box 2925 I 0828 SE 176th St Renton WA 98056-0925 Renton WA 98055 MS: KSC-NR-0600 MS: KSC-TR-0431 KC27 Water & Land Res. Div Gary Kriedt King County Dept. of Natural Res. KC Metro Envirn. Planning Steve Foley UIS LI20 Fairwood Library Highlands Library 17009 -140th Av SE 2902 NE 12th St Renton WA 98058 Renton WA 98056 LI23 Documents Dept. Librarian Ll24 Kent Regional Library King County Library System 212--2ndAvN 960 Newport Way NW Kent WA 98032-4482 Issaquah, WA 98027 LI36 ATIN: Edward White PL18 Renton Library Kent Engineering Dept 100 Mill Av S 220-4thAvS Renton WA 98055 Kent WA 98032 PL19 City of Renton PL33 Kent Planning Dept Economic Development Dept. 220 -4th Av S 1055 S. Grady Way Kent WA 98032 Renton WA 98055 Clinton G. Marsh, Director Fae. & Const. Dept SD9 R. Stracke, Facilities & Ping SD13 Kent School District# 415 Renton School Dist# 403 12033 SE 256th St. Bldg B 1220 N 4th St Kent WA 98031-6643 Renton WA 98055 Administrator SES Environmental Review Section ST2 Kent Sewer Utility WA State Dept of Ecology 220 -4th Av S POBox47703 Kent WA 98032 Olympia WA 98504-7703 Habitat Biologist, Rod Malcom TRI Russ Ladley, Fisheries Biologist TR2 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Puyallup Tribe 39015 -172ndAv SE 6824 Pioneer Wy E Auburn WA 98002 Puyallup WA 98371 TR3 Fisheries Habitat/Environment TRS Snoqualmie Tribe Suquamish Indian Tribe PO Box 280 PO Box 498 Carnation WA 98014-0280 Suquamish WA 98392 -. Richard Young Tulalip Tribe 7615 Totem Beach Rd Marysville WA 98271 Public Works Dtr Kent Water Dist 220 -4th Av S Kent WA 98032 Soos Creek Water/Sewer Dist PO Box 58039 Renton WA 98058-1039 Coal Creek Utility District 6801 132nd Place SE Newcastle, WA 98059 WA State Dept. of Wildlife 16018 Mill Creek Blvd. Mill Creek, WA 98012 WA State Dept. of Ecology NW Regional Office 3190 -160th Ave SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 WA St DOT MS 240 15700 Dayton Ave No. PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 WA St. Ecology Dept/WQSW Unit Linda Matlock PO Box 47696 Olympia, WA 98504-7696 Eleanor Moon KC Executive Horse Council 12230 NE 61st Kirkland, WA 98033 TR4 WD23 WD41 WD57 WD12 Cedar River Water/Sewer Dist 18300 SE Lk Youngs Rd Renton WA 8058-9799 City of Renton, Public Works Dept. WD32 Development Services Div. 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 WD55 Water Dist #90 15606 SE !28th St Renton WA 98059-8522 WD58 Water Dist #111 27224 -144th Av SE Kent WA 98042-9058 WA State Dept. of Wildlife Habitat Mgmt. Division P.O. Box 43155 Olympia, WA 98504-3155 WA St.DOT MS 230 15700 Dayton Ave. No PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 WA St.DOT MS 250 15700 Dayton Ave. No. PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Roger Dorstad PO Box 375 Redmond, WA 98073 ® Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division Notice I Hearing, Recommendation & SEPA Decision 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (SEPA Threshold Determination, Type 3 & 4) File No.: L03TY401 & L03P0005 Project Name: Liberty Grove Contiguous DDES Project Manager: Karen J. Scharer (206) 296-7114 or e-mail karen.scharer@metrokc.gov Applicant: Wayne Jones Lakeridge Development PO Box 146, Renton, WA 98057 (425) 228-9750 Project Location: The site is located south of SE 136th Street, between 160th Ave. SE and 162th Avenue Southeast Project Description: Proposed is Rezone from R-4 to R-6 and subdivision of the site into 36 lots for detached single family residences and tracts for sensitive areas, recreation and drainage facilities. The applicant .proposes to use 4 density credit transfers to plat the 36 lots if the rezone is denied. Permits Requested: Rezone and Subdivision SEPA Threshold Determination: Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) issued December 16, 2003 Department Recommendation to the Hearing Examiner: Deny Reclassification and Approve the Subdivision subject to conditions Public Hearing Date: February 10, 2004 at 9:30 A.M. Location of Public Hearing: DOES, Hearing Room -first floor 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Comment/Appeal Procedure: Comments on this SEPA determination are welcome. This SEPA determination may also be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner. A notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) Land Use Services Division (LUSD) at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on January 9, 2004, and be accompanied with a filing fee of $250.00 payable to King County Office of Finance. If a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall also file a Statement of Appeal with DDES/LUSD at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on January 9, 2004. The Statement of Appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including the file number) and the alleged errors in that decision. Further, the Statement of Appeal shall state: 1) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the Statement of Appeal. Failure to timely file a Notice of Appeal, appeal fee or Statement of Appeal, deprives the Hearing Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Appeals must be submitted to ODES. DOES will issue a written report and recommendation to the Hearing Examiner two weeks prior to the public hearing. Persons wishing to receive a copy should contact DDES/LUSD. Following the close of the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner will issue a written recommendation for the rezone and a decision for the plat which may be appealed to the Metropolitan-King County Council. Appeal procedures will be stated in the Examiner's written recommendation and decision. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact DDES/LUSD at the address and/or telephone number listed. Written comments may also be submitted to DOES. A public hearing as required by law will be held to consider the approval of this application. If the Renton , . J; School District announces a district-wide school closure due to adverse weather conditions or similar area Pl)lY emergency, the public hearing on this matter will be postponed. Interested parties will be notified of the time b::l and date of the rescheduled hearing. Any questions regarding postponements and rescheduling can be directed \) to the Hearing Examiner's Office at (206) 296-4660. , .\\ DDES-Land Use Services Division \Y December 16, 2003 Date Mailed Attn: Permit Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 f If you have any questions regarding the appeal procedures, please contact the planner at the phone number listed above. If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, call (206) 296-6600 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (ITY). ~ MAIN FILE COPY~ • King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Notice Board & Posting Procedures Instruction Package Notice of Application May 15, 2003 L03P0006/L03TY 403 In accordance with King County Code Section 20.20.060, enclosed you wiJI find instructions, specifications, and materials in order to meet the notice of application posting requirements of the County. Please read these instructions carefully and take action quickly to order your notice board sign. Your notice board sign can be ordered through a sign painter, using the information supplied on page 2 of the enclosed "Notice Board Requirements." The cost of the sign is the responsibility of the applicant. Further processing of your application is dependent upon fulfilling the notice of application posting requirement. When your sign is in place, attach the colored laminated notice of application along with the plastic envelope ( containing extra copies of the notice of application) to the notice board as depicted on page 1 of the instructions. Maintain a supply of notices within the plastic envelope throughout the comment period. The posting sign/notice board must remain in place throughout the duration of your application. Immediately upon completion of the above instructions, complete the enclosed affidavit of posting and return to the Department of Development and Environmental Services, Land Use Division, Current Planning Section, at the address shown above (envelope enclosed). Failure to comply with posting requirements may be cause for a delay in the processing of your application. If you have any questions, please call the Land Use Services Division at (206) 296-6600. Enclosures: Notice Board Requirements-Application Laminated Notice of Application Waterproof Vinyl Envelope containing copies of the Notice of Application Affidavit of Notice of Application Posting form/LUSD return envelope Notice Board & Posting Procedures Instruction Pkg.-NOA 8/8/01 MAIN FILE COP" ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING L03P0006 & L03TY403-Liberty Grove plat & rezone DDES Project Number I, ____ ------c--c--------c------' hereby affirm that I have posted the following: (print name) X Notice of Permit Application D Other --------------- on the day of , 2003, in accordance with the Department of Development and Environmental Services' requirements. I further affirm that the notice will remain in place and visible during the full required notice period. Notice was provided at the following location(s): 1) 2) __________________________ _ 3) I hereby affirm that the above is a true and correct statement. Signature This affidavit must be completed and returned to the Land Use Services Division within 7 days of posting. Improper posting or failure to return the affidavit within 7 days shall be cause for the final decision regarding your permit to be postponed. CPSFORMS/AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING.DOC 7/27/99 NOTICE BOARD t<EQUIREMENTS- NOTICE OF APPLICATION King County Dept. of Development and Environmt!ntal Servici:s Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1212 Per King County Code Section 20.20.060, a notice board must be prepared and posted for your land use application. Please prepare and post in the following manner: Notice Board Size and Text Specifications The notice board shall be constructed to the specifications described below. The notice board shall display the information shown in the figure. Board Construction: The notice board shall be constructed with 4' x 4' plywood. Professionally prepared plastic notice board overlays, permanently affixed to the board are permissible. Notice boards may be reused but they must be clean and show no evidence of former wording. 1. Lettering style: Helvetica or similar standard typeface 2. Lettering size: Title should be 3" capital letters (NOTICE OF PROPOSED LAND USE ACTION). Other letters should be 2" letters except on the 8%" x 14" laminated paper providing the details of the proposal. See illustration below for use of capital and lower case letters, and placement of laminated paper and vinyl jacket. 3. Lettering: Black (permanent ink or silk-screen) 4. Background Color: White 5. Logo: King County emblem, in black 6. Laminated Notice of Application on a legal size sheet which provides information regarding the proposed land use application. TO BE SUPPLIED BY Land Use Services Division (LUSD) (see enclosed). 7. Legal size waterproof vinyl jackets with a fold flap, and wrap string. TO BE SUPPLIED BY LUSD (see enclosed). The applicant must make copies of the Notice, place them in the vinyl jacket, and maintain a supply of copies throughout the posting period. 4 FT ® NOTICE OF PROPOSED LAND USE ACTION King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Call (206) 296-6600 Type of Action: Proposal: File No.: NOTICE OF APPLICATION 8.5" X 14" LAMINATED 4 FT EXAMPLE COPIES OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION IN VINYL JACKET Notice Board Requirements-NOA 8/8/01 Pg 1 Standards for Locating and Installing Notice Board The notice board shall be located and installed to the specifications described below. Number of Notice Boards required for this application: TWO Special Instructions:. ___________________________ _ Notice board shall be located: ( one on 158'" Ave SE and one on 160'" Ave SE). • Midpoint on the site street frontage or as otherwise directed by LUSD staff to maximize visibility. • At a location 5 feet inside from the street property line; a notice board structurally attached to an existing building shall be exempt from the setback provisions, provided that no notice board is located not more than 5 feet from the property line without approval from LUSD staff. • So that the top of the notice board is between 7 to 9 feet above grade. , So that it is easily accessible and totally visible to pedestrians. The applicant shall erect the notice board by solidly setting the post 12 to 18 inches into the ground; or structurally attached it to an existing building. Two 4" x 4" 8-foot-long (minimum) posts and four washers, bolts and nuts (3/8-inch diameter and bolts are 5-inches long) shall be used to install the notice board. Installation Certification The notice board(s) must be installed within 14 days after Land Use Services Division has determined that the application is complete. The enclosed "Affidavit of Posting" must be signed, and returned to the Land Use Services Division within 7 days following the date of posting. Maintenance and Removal of the Notice Board The applicant shall maintain the notice board in good condition throughout the application review period, which shall extend through the time of the final county decision on the proposal and the expiration of any applicable appeal periods. If the notice board is removed, LUSD review of the land use application may be discontinued until the notice board is replaced and has remained in place for the required period of time. TO BE FILLED OUT BY LUSD STAFF ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTICE BOARD TEXT INFORMATION (To Be Given to the Sign Painter) Type of Action: Formal Subdivision and Rezone Proposal: Rezone of 4.48 acres from R-4 to R-6 and subdivide into 24 lots for detached single family residences; Density Credit Transfers will be used to plat 24 lots should the rezone be denied. File No.: L03P0006, L03TY403 -Liberty Grove NOTE: If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 206-296-6600 (voice) or for hearing impaired 206-296-7217. Notice Board Requirements-NOA 8/8/01 Pg 2 Rogers, Carol From: Sent: To: Subject: Scharer, Karen Tuesday, May 13, 2003 2:47 PM Rogers, Carol Liberty Grove Complete ltr dated 5/15/03 -signed copy to be mailed NOA attached along with a revised NOA for Liberty Grove Contiguous u l03p0006 NOA.doc I03p0005 NOA Revision.doc Two sign boards -158th Ave SE & 160th Ave SE for LG Two boards for LGC -160th Ave SE & SE 136th St Mail both notices to both 500" radius list I'll distribute information to Bruce, etc at the screening meeting tomorrow Karen J. Scharer, Program/Project Manager 2 Current Planning Section Land Use Services Division, DD ES 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 206-296-7114 Fax 206-296-7051 1 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING L03P0006 & L03TY403 -Liberty Gmve plat & mone /jjjfs@ /g /J /!7 /f;w DOES Project Number ~UN O 3. lS O 2003 lf.c. D I,,-=-M~,7."'7._.W.~o"'</'-'/l"'-""cc.cJc..oe:,/2=e,,,_5_,J,ccr''--'-, __ , hereby affirm that I have posted the r&l<$,,,9;g: / (print name) X Notice of Permit Application D Other ______________ _ on the 217,:/ day of Jut?t: , 2003, in accordance with the Department of Development and Environmental Services' requirements. I further affirm that the notice will remain in place and visible during the full required notice period. Notice was provided at the following \ocation(s): 2) __ /_/_· ____ /_/ ___ ,-,;_, _____ /_/ __ ...;_,,,. ___ .,.,.-;_;;;;_{Jc._:_'.,,';;_:_.~"--',,'9c--=-=t/-'~Cc.•_.5>:=--:::~=--- 3) --- that e above is a true and correct statement. This affidavit must be completed and returned to the Land Use Services Division within 7 days of posting. Improper posting or failure to return the affidavit within 7 days shall be cause for the final decision regarding your permit to be postponed. /:: Exhibit No. -'-"-'~"!'-,,,----- CPSFORMS/AFFIDA VIT OF POSTING.DOC 7/27/99 Item No. Lc..Ys o ~ Received ,J/-;Q -~ King County Hearing Examiner MAIN FILE COPY ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services OAK-DE-0100 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055 CPLN/CR King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 ,1u-_0·-_ -.~ ,..v . _.., PM ' ,'} ,_ -u ~-': ·-JIJN < . .]3 - -_____:::.... --~--------· ,:=:::' ~::~=-~-, -== .. T ..... ..----,,_,,,...,__,_-__ _ _______ ....... --·--·------~--------·"' -·-·-·· __... __ ----~----~---- ...., = = '-'-' ::-~ S: C ~ I C' w 0 J::;~ "1 :x V> -.. N _, XI' '"T1 ... •' !' ··1 L.. • ~e.<:!'5'5-1-\2.\~ <:>2 11,1,. I,, I, II,,,, I, I. ,I ,I,,,, II,, I, I,, ,Ill, I .. I ,I, ,I, 1 .... 1.11 !: ~ z "11 r= m 0 0 .,, < ST ATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Allison Fryer, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the King County Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a NorJcE o;::. L4NO Us£ Pt!2M1r !lf)f LJ C..4[!0 N was published on LU[ . 1 2il2o,/o 3 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ /;) 9. :}j at the rate of ;)9 00 per inch for the first publication and NA per inch for each subsequent insertion. ~llison Fryer Legal Advertising R"epresentative, Ki'.;, County Journal Subscribed and sworn to me this /5t day of MAY 2o_Q3_ ~·· ,,, .. , .. 'oily A Bauer •. ~'-1 ·-"·:,·,{:.~!.· • ~,\ .... l ~'.-'') -.·.~•, Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Bellevue, W~~?~;,L·.}.'):"-•, P.O. Nu. ___________ _ Cost of publishing this notice includes an affidavit surcharge. :::·'-~: ~·::{'''' -···.:.:.'·;·:;i,\~ ::.; ~:;., • ,... .,.. ~ r'1 ,1-,, ..... \J ... :~:f~i,~ _.:\,J ;..;:,~/'.• R:,7 r':,(: , • r, ·--~:'-'o',,; '~,;', .•..•. 1_1:::-·,·.:·•. ~:- :t,1; o;: v:; r .s.·-;\ \'· ... : 111111111111\\. KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMEN'l' & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 980/!5-1219 . NOTICE OF LAND USE PEBMIT APPLICATION REQUEST· REZONE and FOBMMc SUBDJYISION File: L03TY403 & L03P0006 File Name: Liberty Grove Rezone and Plat Applicant: Wayne Jones, Lakeridge Development Location: Located north of SE 136th St, between 160th Ave SE & 158th Ave SE. Proposal: Recla"sify 4.48 acres'. from R-4 to R-6 and subdivide into 24 lots for det&ched.1 single-family residences; Density Credit Transfers to plat 24 lots is proposed if the rezone is denied. Project Planner: Karen Scharer, 206-296,7114 COMMENT PROCEDURES· Comments on the above file are now being accepted by King County DDES, Land Use Services Division, at the address listed above. Phone: 206-296-6600. Published in the King County Journal May 20, 2003. #843212 Affidavit of Publication 2059593 I 2 State of Washington, Counties of King and Snohomish, Daniel S. O' Neal being duly sworn, says that he/she is the Authorized Agent of Seattle Times Company, publisher of The Seattle Times and representing the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, separate newspapers published daily in King and Snohomish Counties, State of Washington: that they are newspapers of general circulation in said Counties and State; that they have been approved as legal newspapers by orders of the Superior Court of King and Snohomish Counties; that the annexed, being a classified advertisement, was published in: Newspaper Publication Date The Seattle Times 05/20/03 And not in a supplement thereof, and is a true copy of the notice as it was printed and/or distributed in the regular and entire issue of said paper or papers during all of said period, and that said newspaper or newspapers were regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 23'' day of May, 2003 KING COUNl\'bEPT. OF QEVl:LOPMENT & ENViRONM_EN_ JAL SERW.VICES 901l' Ooke5d01e Ave. 5 Renton, WA '80S!i·1 9 NOTICE OF LAND USE . PERMIT APPLICATION REQu~Sn. ~b(}~E and .. FP~¥At:,SUB0IV!$1!,)N_ Fi1e·: j:.o,a-ry~,&.J:.~'p~ File ·Ncm~i";-. · Li~ty "Gr9.Je Rezone <ir'l!J Plat APPlicc;11JI: W,oyile.J!?l'les( LOkerii;ige OeveJOflment Location~ Locoti?d ii0i1h of SE 136\h.StJietween 160tli· Ave, SI;: & 15Btti A~e_SE, ' PropoSOI': __ Reclp_~ify ·4.4l!_,~r_es_ trarf'LR-.ttoR'6dnds IYJ.1Jt!1ri10 ~4 'r!A~~'t i"J11.rti~ _. -.-__ .. --. -i:\ Pro1ed1>1un~r; K~fiiifl·.~tj-oret'i 206i-296'71U·:,!•.·: ,, .... , '·. ··.1 t~/'.:·_._pR·oc:~DuR."ES: ~~!In% lln· thin1tio"V"e:111\orp citn~~~~lt3~!!14/te~~\~ 01v[sjpw~·.9f-. ,tmL .(l(IO.t!r-iS -, 11s1et1 above. Pl;io~ .... ~~- Pubtishd.tliis·. 2!i'~· i:fov':ot_-· Mo.r~:l.l)Ol~' .:.,,._ ; ·_..;--,· ·,,,<'i;'·t,-'-".":.t,<i>·~a..Yi<"'~'-· ' MAIN FILE COPY Rogers, Carol From: Rogers, Carol Sent: To: Subject: Thursday, May 15, 2003 12:46 PM 'legals.bellevue@kingcountyjournal.com'; 'legals@seattletimes.com' Legal ad for publ. on Tuesday, 5/20 Please confirm receipt. Please publish the accompanying, legal notice in your newspaper on TUESDAY May 20 2003, which will meet our minimum legal notice requirement. Should this not be possible, please call or fax me immediately. Submit your invoice and 3 copies of the affidavit of publication to Accounts Payable, as soon after publication as possible, in order tor us to enter legal proof of publication in our file records, and so that we may process same for payment. Attachment: Legal Notice KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219 NOTICE OF LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION REOlJESJ· File: File Name: Applicant: Location: REZONE and FORMAL SUBDIVISION L03TY 403 & L03P0006 Liberty Grove Rezone and Plat Wayne Jones, Lakeridge Development Located north of SE 1361h St, between 1601h Ave SE & 1581h Ave SE. Proposal: Reclassify 4.48 acres from R-4 to R-6 and subdivide into 24 lots for detached single-family residences; Density Credit Transfers to plat 24 lots is proposed if the rezone is denied. Project Planner: Karen Scharer. 206-296-7114 COMMENT PROCEDl !RES· Comments on the above file are now being accepted by King County DDES, Land Use Services Division, at the address listed above. Phone: 206-296-6600. Published this 20 1h day of May, 2003. cc: Accounts Payable, Administrative Services Division, DOES Application File(s): L03P0006/L03TY403; Liberty Grove plat and rezone application notice. 1 MAIN FILE COPY ~ ~·RE: Legal ad fo1 publ~on Juesila§lti5l20:""ld:e~tWJU,tli "' ·,. " , --< -- ~~ Tl.0..JBIU --------=--=-T j J Eile !;;dit \ljew Insert FQ.rmat Iools 8.ctions !:!elp T • T £ I (z) Tl _ _J J r.i B.eply I ~ Reply to AU I .r For~ard J ~ ~ I "" I rs 0-1 • From: To: Cc: Tom Meagher [tom, meagher@eastsidejournal.com] Rogers, Carol Subject: RE: Legal ad for publ. on Tuesday, 5/20 Hi, Caroll Sent: Thu 05/15/2003 2:08 PM A I have received your email, with the attachment, and will publish the notice (Re/File Nos. L03TY403 and L03P0006) in the 5/20/03 edition of the King County Journal. Thanks a lot, Carol,, have a great rest of the day! Tom Meagher Legal Advertising Representative King County Journal Newspapers Phone 425-453-4296 Fax: 4 25-635-0602 -----Original Mes sage----- From: Rogers, Carol [mailto:Carol.Rogers@lv!ETROKC.GOVJ Sent: Thmsday, May 15, 2003 12:46 PM To: 'legals.bellevue@kingcountyjoumal.com'; 'legals@seattletimes.com' Subject: Legal ad for pub!. on Tuesday, 5120 g,t Sta,t liJ If; '5,SiJ ~ ! j ~ lnbox · Microsoft.. I 6'J 'PERMITS' Plus I W' Microsoft Word Friday, May 16, 2003 1140 AM King County -DOES ..:J JI~ RE: Legal ad I... li~liJ ijkf!, ~ 1140AI~ Z!RE: l...'eg<II ad for publ. on Tu~i ;,5120 r~ :· "{HIM~ff ·Si; • • I ·l~IBIQ: ~------------~ J Eile !;:dit I/Jew [nsert FQrmat Iool; Action; Help j l'?.i B_eply I ~ Reply to A~ I i.Ci For1:1ard I ~ ~ I 'f' I [/S" X. I • • • • Ji,, I 12J • j From: Legal; [legal;@;eattletimes.com] To: Roger;, Carol Cc: Subject: RE: Legal ad for publ. on Tuesday, 5/20 Thanks Carol -----Orig ina I Message----- From: Rogers,Carol[mailto:Carol.Rogers@METROKC.GOV) Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 12:46 PM To: 'legals.bellevue@kingcountyjournal.com'; Legals Subject: Legal ad for publ. on Tuesday, 5/.20 Please confirm receipt. Please publish the accompanying, legal notice in your newspaper on TUESDAY, May 20, 2003, which will meet our minimum legal notice requirement. Should this not be possible. please call or fax me immediately. Submit your invoice and 3 copies of the affidavit of publication to Accounts Payable, as soon after publication as possible. in order for us to enter legal proof of publication in our file records, and so that we may process same for payment. Attachment: Legal Notice .:M.J~ Sent: Tnu 05/15/2003 12: 58 PM ... KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES qnn n,.kP<arfalp [lup <.W RPnton Wll QRn'i'i_171Q !1'1 Start II j ~ (i;Sil :;d I J F!!! lnbos -Microsoft.I ..J 'PERMITS' Plus I IW Microsoft Word ~ 11~RE: Legal ad ... 11~1¥'\iJQi'~~ 1140.6.M Friday, May 16, 2003 11 :40 AM King County -DOES ® Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division Notice of Application 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Applicant: Wayne Jones Lakeridge Development PO Box 146 Renton, WA 98057 (425) 228-9750 File #'s: L03P0006 & L03TY 403 Liberty Grove Plat & Rezone DOES : Karen Scharer Permit Manager Telephone No. (206) 296-7114 (Type 3 & 4) Date Plat Application Filed: March 11, 2003 Date Rezone Application Filed: May 7, 2003 Date Files Determined Complete: May 15, 2003 Project Location: The site is .located north of SE 136th Street, between 1601 h Ave. SE and 1581 h Avenue Southeast Project Description: Proposed is a rezone of 4.48 acres from R-4 to R-6 and to subdivide the site into 24 lots for detached single family residences and tract for recreation. As an alternative, the applicant proposes to use Density Credit Transfers to plat 24 lots should the rezone be denied. Permits requested in this application: Rezone -L03TY 403, Formal Plat -L03P0006 Relevant environmental documents are available at the address below: Environmental checklist & drainage study Development regulations to be used for project mitigation, known at this time: KCC 19A, 20, 21A, including sensitive area regulations, road standards and 1998 Surface Water Design Manual Consistency with applicable County plans and regulations: This proposal will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable King County Codes, including those noted above. Other permits not included in this application, known at this time: None at this time A public hearing before the King County Hearing Examiner is required for this application. Notification of the public hearing date will occur approximately 30 days prior to the scheduled hearing. The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) will issue a report and recommendation to the Hearing Examiner two (2) weeks prior to the scheduled public hearing. Following the close of the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner will issue a written recommendation which may be appealed to the Metropolitan-King County Council. The Council will make the final decision on the rezone. Details of the appeal process will be included in the notice of recommendation. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact DOES at the address and/or telephone number listed below. Written comments may also be submitted to DOES. You may review the application and any environmental documents or studies in our Renton office. NOTE: If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call (206) 296-6600 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (TTY). Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division Mailing Date: May 29, 2003 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 -------------------------------------------------Please send me notification of the public hearing and other official notices concerning this application. File No's: Liberty Grove -L03P0006 & L03TY403 ( please print ) Name: ________________________________ _ Address: ______________________________ _ Telephone No.: ------------ ALTERNATIVE FORMATS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST F96\sprs\120. lp\Type~ 4 . nca 7 /18/96-9, 4 6AM/d:j MAIN FILE COP'f ' .. , .'-',;, __ ·,,:,.., ... ;,:: ::::;:: h ~ • 0 c:, -..J b ......, rn = = (/) c...> II~~--=======~~~====::,==;:~@--~ ! ® @ ------·---------- © © • 0 0 0 0 '0 0 ----- @ @ © 0 0 @ 1; l! ·, ~ :-~ re;!=/ I 1--1-,-_.___, (jJ _---, 0147! @ (iJ ® © @ ® Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division Notice of Application 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Applicant: Wayne Jones Lakeridge Development PO Box 146 Renton, WA 98057 (425) 228-9750 File #'s: L03P0006 & L03TY403 Liberty Grove Plat & Rezone DOES : Karen Scharer Permit Manager Telephone No. (206) 296-7114 (Type 3 & 4) Date Plat Application Filed: March 11, 2003 Date Rezone Application Filed: May 7, 2003 Date Files Determined Complete: May 15, 2003 Project Location: The site is located north of SE 136'h Street, between 160'h Ave. SE and 158'h Avenue Southeast Project Description: Proposed is a rezone of 4.48 acres from R-4 to R-6 and to subdivide the site into 24 lots for detached single family residences and tract for recreation. As an alternative, the applicant proposes to use Density Credit Transfers to plat 24 lots should the rezone be denied. Permits requested in this application: Rezone -L03TY403, Formal Plat-L03P0006 Relevant environmental documents are available at the address below: Environmental checklist & drainage study Development regulations to be used for project mitigation, known at this time: KCC 19A, 20, 21A, including sensitive area regulations, road standards and 1998 Surface Water Design Manual Consistency with applicable County plans and regulations: This proposal will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable King County Codes, including those noted above. Other permits not included in this application, known at this time: None at this time A public hearing before the King County Hearing Examiner is required for this application. Notification of the public hearing date will occur approximately 30 days prior to the scheduled hearing. The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) will issue a report and recommendation to the Hearing Examiner two (2) weeks prior to the scheduled public hearing. Following the close of the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner will issue a written recommendation which may be appealed to the Metropolitan-King County Council. The Council will make the final decision on the rezone. Details of the appeal process will be included in the notice of recommendation. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact DOES at the address and/or telephone number listed below. Written comments may also be submitted to DOES. You may review the application and any environmental documents or studies in our Renton office. NOTE: If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call (206) 296-6600 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (TTY). Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 Mailing Date: May 29, 2003 Please send me notification of the public hearing and other official notices concerning this application. File No's: Liberty Grove -L03P0006 & L03TY403 ( please print) Name:. ________________________________ _ Address:. _____________________________ _ Telephone No.: ____________ _ ALTERNATIVE FORMATS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST F96\sprs\12 0. lp \ Type -4 . noa 7 / 18/ 96-9: 4 6AM/ dj :,; !,"'> 0 c:, rn (/) 3 ~ 0 -.J I - i : I ., H L ·'! : . -·- 0 0 • 0 0 0 G © 0 1--==-:.=--. --- © ® --- © © I- 8 0 0 ,. 0 0 i~ I '! !-~ --..... ~.- ® @ © 'J'.J· ' ' I· !· I- 1· §,uf\ \.---I- -- @ ® ® © © r·1 ® hJ.@ ~-.,.;..., h~ .___...., ® © r·T, I• !·, '·F j ;, I· I •· ,. I/ i I• !• i := I• I I• j_ -.. ___ !II_._ . --- --- ------:- 01471 @ © © ~ ~· m' ;~]> i @ ~'i~I r;<~oo l iii% ; I -------.. j I \ BORBA,GREG CURRENT PLANNING SUPERVISOR DOES/ LUSD MS: OAK-DE-0100 BOWEN, WILLIAM J. BOWEN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 13644 160TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98055 BOWE:-.T, WILMA J. 13644 160TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 CLAUSSEN, KIM SR. PLANNER DDES/LUSD MS: OAK-DE-0100 DMP INC. MEL DALEY 726 AUBURN WAY NORTH AUBURN, WA 98002 GrLLEN, NICK WETLAND REVIEW DDES/LUSD MS: OAK-DE-0100 HERRIN, BRAD & JULIE 16202 SE 137TH PL RENTON, WA 98059 LAKERIDGE DEVELOPMENT INC WAYNE JONES PO BOX 146 RENTON, WA 98057 LANGLEY, KRIS LAND USE TRAFFIC REVIEW DOES /LUSD MS: OAK -DE-0100 • LOJP0005 LOJP0005 LOJP0005 LOJP0005 LOJP0005 LOJP0005 LOJP0005 L03P0005 L03P0005 LEE, MlLTON & HELEN PO BOX 2574 RENTON, WA 98056 LIND, REBECCA CITY OF RENTON EDNSP DEPT. 1055 S. GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98055 OORD, SUSAN & LARRY 16013 SE 136TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 PLATT, DAVID & GEORGIA 510 E. PANORAMIC DRIVE CAMANO ISLAND, WA 98282 PLATZ,GUY 13535 160TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 RESIDENT IJ\l2\l \60TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 ROGERS, CAROL CURRENT PLANNING SECTION DDES/LUSD MS: OAK -DE-0100 SCHARER. KAREN PROJECT PLANNER DDES/LUSD MS: OAK -DE-0100 STEWART, DEBORAH J. 16207 SE 136TH ST. RENTON, WA 98059 L03P0005 LOJP0005 LOJP0005 LOJP0005 L03P0005 LOJP0005 L03P0005 LOJP0005 LOJP0005 THATCHER, JESSE 13817162NDAVESE RENTON, WA 98059 WEST,LARRY DDES /LUSD GEO REVIEW MS: OAK -DE-OlOO WHITTAKER, BRUCE PRELIMINARY REVIEW ENGINEER DDESILUSD MS: OAK-DE-0100 LOJP0005 LOJP0005 LOJP0005 0 SEE L03P0005 FOR COMPLETE POR LISP* LOJP0006 2006000040/l,03P0506 BAURICHTER DON M 14025 176TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 1457500096/L03P0506 BOWDEN EDWARD & SHARON I 3939 SE I 0TH PL RENTON WA 98058 2006000110/L03P0506 CACCHIONE SCOTT M 16048 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98056 2006000190/L03P0506 COFFIN RONALD E 16015 SE 135TH RENTON WA 98055 3664500240/L03P0506 CONSERV ATJVE BAPTIST CHURCH 13232 J 56TH SE RENTON WA 98056 1457500127/L03P0506 DEGOOD RANDALL D 13609 164TH AV SE RENTON WA 98056 3664500136/L03P0506 DUKE JAMES PO BOX 2262 RENTON WA 98056 4306500120/L03P0506 GROVER RAYMOND E+MARYHELEN 16203 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 36645001 OO/L03P0506 HAMILTON MARYE 15821 SE 132ND PL RENTON WA 98059 2006000030/L03P0506 HORNER RANDY L+BONNIE 13404 160TH SE RENTON WA 98056 36 ..• 00278/L03P0506 BECKMAN FRANCIS J JR BECKMAN ROBIN J 13511158THAVSE RENTON WA 98059 1457500090/L03P0506 BOWEN VIRGILE 13644 160TH AV SE RENTON WA 98056 PL50/L03P0506 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 4306500080/L03P0506 COLLIER JAMES J 6235 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98059 2006000060/L03P0506 CROONQUJST JOHN E SR CROONQUIST ELIZABETH A PO BOX 2352 RENTON WA 98056 2006000100/L03P0506 DEROUIN JONATHAN W 13421 162ND AV SE RENTON WA 98059 2006000080/L03P0506 FOSMIRE MICHAEL C+KAYE L 16049 SE 134TH ST RENTON WA 98056 4306500110/L03P0506 HAAS MICHELET 16211 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98059 4306500010/L03P0506 HERRIN BRADLEY J 16202 SE 137TH RENTON WA 98059 3664500126/L03P0506 JOHNSON GLENDA E 13425 160TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 3. )00 l 321L03P0506 BEHR PATRICK D 15914SE 134TH PL RENTON WA 98059 2006000270/L03P0506 BURKS JAMES W 16038 SE 136TH RENTON WA 98055 PL33/L03P0506 CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 4306500JOO/L03P0506 COLLIER·KERSTETTER DEBRA+ MICHAELS KERSTETTER 16219 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 2006000140/L03P0506 DA VIES ROBERT A & LORI 14708 30TH NE SEATTLE WA 98126 1457500128/L03P0506 DRAKE TERRY GENE+DAWN MARIE 16223 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 UAC,FC/L03P0506 FOUR CREEKS UN IN CORPORA TED AREA COUNCIL PO BOX 3501 RENTON WA 98056 3664500250/L03P0506 HAIR JARED L+LAURA STAUTZ 13422 156TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500135/L03P0506 HILTON EDWARD W+NANCY J 13414 158TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 2006000260/LO 3 PUS or, JOHNSON JOHNNIE M 16046 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98055 14575000701L03P0506 JOHNSON MORRIS O JR+HOLLY A 2635 REDWOOD ST ANCHORAGE AK 99508 4306500050/L03P0506 KEENE MICHAEL & JENNIFER 16234 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98059 4306500030/L03P0506 KNUTSON ERIC E+KNUTSON MELISSA R 16218 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98059 2006000200/L03P0506 MAGGARD DONALDS 16023 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 1457500126/L03P0506 MCKENDRY JAMES J STEWART DEBORAH J 16207 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 1423059043/L03P0506 MILBRATH DON D 15624 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98055 2006000220/L03P0506 MOELLER STEVEN R I 0836 CRESTWOOD DR S SEATTLE WA 98178 2006000280/L03P0506 NASS LEROY 15713 SE 128TH RENTON WA 98056 2006000160/L03P0506 NORRIS JOHN B+ROSA M 10516 172ND CT SE RENTON WA 98059 1423059009/L03P0506 NYBLOM DAVID A+DEBRA L ALBI 13606158TH AVSE RENTON WA 98059 3 500 l 33/L03P0506 JOHNSON WILLIAM 15902 SE 134TH PL RENTON WA 98059 14230590421L03P0506 KEZELE DON+DIANE 15657 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 4306500020/L03P0506 LA WREN CE JOHN 16210 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98055 1423059022/L03P0506 MAIR ROBERT 13606 156TH AV SE RENTON WA 98056 1457500100/L03P0506 MCNAIR DANNY M POIJOX 18914 SEATTLE WA 98118 36645D0285/L03P0506 MILL CHARLES V+ CATHERINEM 13434 156TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 2006000010/L03P0506 MUHICH STEVEN C+PERI A 13420 160TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 l457500l35/L03P0506 NGUGEN ANNM PO BOX 5111 KENT WA 98064 3664500!27/L03P0506 NOTTDALEH 13422 158TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500270/L03P0506 OSGOODBY ALAN G 13527158TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 ., ,_000150/L03P0506 JOHNSTON LEOI\ARD J 16016SE 135Tll RENTON WA 98059 2006000020/L03P0506 KNAPP RICHARD A+MICHAEL E 13412160TH AVSE RENTON WA 98059 14575D0095/L03P0506 LEE STEVEN P 13802160TH AVSE RENTON WA 98059 1457500087/L03P0506 MCDONALD KIMBERLY ANNE 6947 COAL CREEK PKWY SE PMB354 NEWCASTLE WA 98059 1423059112/L03P0506 MILBRATH DON D 15624 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 1457500140/L03P0506 MIYA KEITH L+ANN E 223 BREMERTO's AV SE RENTON WA 98059 2006000210/L03P0506 NASS LEROY 15713 SE 128TH RENTON WA 98056 l423059058/L03P0506 NICHOLS MARK E & BARBARA A 13815 160TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500120/L03P0506 NOTT FLORENCE 15915 SE 134TH PL RENTON WA 98059 366450028 I /L03P0506 OSGOODBY BRUCE SHANNON 13456 156TH SE RENTON WA 98055 366451J0280/L03P0506 OSGOODBY ELEANOR & VICTOR OSGOODBY BRUCE 13436156TH SE RENT01' WA 98056 3590000050/L03P0506 PAPE WARREN K OR SARA 13420 162ND AV SE RENTON WA 98055 3664500260/L03P0506 PERRY LUCILLE M 13426 156TH AV SE RENTON WA 98056 3664500245/L03P0506 PICKENS GWENDOLYN+HIGH VICTOR 13405158TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 3664500141/L03P0506 PLATZ GUYE ET AL 13535 160TH AVSE RENTON WA 98059 20060001301L03P0506 ROBERTSON GORDON R+SULTANA 16032 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 SD8/L03P0506 STEVE CRAWFORD, NEW CONSTRUCTION JSSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT #411 565 NW HOLLY ST ISSAQUAH WA 98027 CG21L03P0506 SUSAN SULLIVAN 24311 SE 47TH ST ISSAQUAH WA 98029 1457500040/L03P0506 THREADGILL GARRY E 16216 SE 135TH RENTON WA 98055 43065000901L03P0506 WASSELL MARIANNE L 16227 SOUTHEAST 137TH PL RENTON WA 98059 3_, 5002791L03P0506 OSGOODBY JR BRUCE S 13523158THAVSE RENTON WA 98059 14575000861L03P0506 PAPPAS LONNIE S 16009 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 366450026 J/L03P0506 PERRY LUCILLE M 13426156 AV SE RENTON WA 98055 1457500085/L03P0506 PLATT DAVID+GEORGIA 510 E PANORAMIC DR CAMANO ISLAND WA 98282 1423059 IOJIL03P0506 POAGUE JOHN+GEORGJA 15111 SE 43RD ST BELLEVUE WA 98006 2006000240/L03P0506 SIDEBOTHAM CHRIS G 16055 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98055 20060001701L03P0506 STREIT PEGGY ANN 13512160TH AVSE RENTON WA 98055 1457500097/L03P0506 THATCHER JESSE T+ERIN N 13817162NDAVSE RENTON WA 98059 20060002501L03P0506 TULL MIKE 16056 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 2006000120/L03P0506 WEIK DOUGLAS R+CRYSTAL A 16040 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 I ., , 5000371L03P0506 PAPE WARREN K & SARA M 13420 162 SE RENTO~ WA 98055 2006000070/LOJP0506 PEELER BARBARA L 16041 SE 134TH ST RENTON WA 98059 4306500040/L03P0506 PETERSON PATTY A+DAVE L I 6226 SE 137TH PL RENTON WA 98056 20060001801L03P0506 PLATZ ERIN D 14627160TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 SD J 3/LOJP0506 R. STRACKE, FACILITIES & PLANNING RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT #403 1220 N 4TH ST RENTON WA 98055 2006000300/L03P0506 SIMONSON REGAN J+BROTHERTON MARYE 16016 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 2006000290/LOJP0506 SULT LINDA R 16022 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 1457500038/L03P0506 THREADGILL G 16216 SE 135TH RENTON WA 98055 2006000050/LOJP0506 WAINWRIGHT MICHAEL A+NECJA 16025 SE 134TH ST RENTON WA 98059 3590000040/L03P0506 WILLIAMS TERRI R 13421 163RD AV SE RENTON WA 98059 ' . . 1457500 IO l/L03P0506 WILMOT ROBERT C+CAROL LYNN 13900 160TH SE RENTON WA 98059 I· ..• 00088/L03P0506 WOLBERG ALVIN & DIANE 16021 SE 136TH ST RENTON WA 98059 3vo,)0() l 3 J/L()3P()5()(i WOOD ALVIN R+WENDY S I 3403 160TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 (E Rento~) FD25 (Spring Glen) FD40 hre Protection Dist #25 Fire Protection Dist #40 P 0. Box 2925 10828 SE 176th St Renton WA 98056-0925 Renton WA 98055 MS: KSC-NR-0600 MS: KSC-TR-0431 KC27 Water & Land Res. Div Gary Kriedt King County Dept. of Natural Res. KC Metro Envirn. Planning Steve Foley LI15 LI20 Fairwood Library Highlands Library 17009 -140th Av SE 2902 NE 12th St Renton WA 98058 Renton WA 98056 Ll23 Documents Dept. Librarian LI24 Kent Regional Library King County Library System 212--2ndAvN 960 Newport Way NW Kent WA 98032-4482 Issaquah, WA 98027 Ll36 ATTN: Edward White PL18 Renton Library Kent Engineering Dept 100 MLll Av S 220 -4th Av S Renton WA 98055 Kent WA 98032 PL19 City of Renton PL33 Kent Plannmg Dept Economic Development Dept. 220 -4th Av S 1055 S. Grady Way Kent WA 98032 Renton WA 98055 Clinton G. Marsh, Director Fae. & Const. Dept SD9 R. Stracke, Facilities & Plng SD13 Kent School District# 415 Renton School Dist# 403 12033 SE 256th St. Bldg B 1220 N 4th St Kent WA 98031-6643 Renton WA 98055 Administrator SES Environmental Review Section ST2 Kent Sewer Utility WA State Dept of Ecology 220 -4th Av S PO Box47703 Kent WA 98032 Olympia WA 98504-7703 Habitat Biologist, Rod Malcom TRI Russ Ladley, Fisheries Biologist TR2 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Puyallup Tribe 39015 -172nd Av SE 6824 Pioneer Wy E Auburn WA 98002 Puyallup WA 983 71 TR3 Fisheries Habitat/Environment TR5 Snoqualmie Tribe Suquamish Indian Tribe PO Box 280 PO Box498 Carnation WA 98014-0280 Suquamish WA 98392 . ' Richard Young Tulalip Tribe 7615 Totem Beach Rd Marysville WA 98271 Public Works Dtr Kent Water Dist 220-4thAvS Kent WA 98032 Soos Creek Water/Sewer Dist PO Flax 58039 Renton WA 98058-1039 Coal Creek Utility District 680 I 132nd Place SE Newcastle, WA 98059 WA State Dept. of Wildlife 16018 Mill Creek Blvd. Mill Creek, WA 98012 WA State Dept. of Ecology NW Regional Office 3190-160th Ave SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 WA St DOT MS 240 15700 Dayton Ave No. PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 WA St. Ecology Dept/WQSW Unit Linda Matlock PO Box 47696 Olympia, WA 98504-7696 Eleanor Moon KC Executive Horse Council 12230 NE 61st Kirkland, WA 98033 TR4 WD23 WD41 WD57 WD12 Cedar River Water/Sewer Dist 18300 SE Lk Youngs Rd Renton WA 8058-9799 City of Renton, Public Works Dept. WD32 Development Services Div. 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 WD55 Water Dist #90 15606 SE 128th St Renton WA 98059-8522 WD58 Water Dist #111 27224 -144th Av SE Kent WA 98042-9058 WA State Dept. of Wildlife Habitat Mgmt. Division P.O. Box 43155 Olympia, WA 98504-3155 WA St.DOT MS 230 15700 Dayton Ave. No PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 WA St.DOT MS 250 15700 Dayton Ave. No. PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Roger Dorstad PO Box 375 Redmond, WA 98073 r STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Lily Nguyen, being first duly sworn on oath that she is a Legal Advertising Representative of the King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the King County Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Notice of Permit Hearing & Recommendations was published on Friday, 1/9/04 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $377.25 at the rate of $33.00 per inch for the first publication and N/A per inch forP')Ch. subseque_!U, insertion. LilyNgui:; Legal Advertising Representative, King County Journal Subscribed and sworn to me this 9th day of January, 2004. ~ft---.·· . .,\\ll//f/11 ··-l/1, -: "-"'-"Ii~ ,,:, ........ ~ ~ Tom A. Meagher .. ~. E;;p,/••.. ~ Notary Pubhc f~r the State o; Washington, Re:iding·(!r R<;1f!,ffi!lid'.W.f~1wton Ad Number. 84)660 P.O. Numbe1. .: ... _ Cost of publishing this notice includes an affid~it iµrcharg~. ; · · -== -. " ~ U' ·-.,, ,. . . ·, ~ /'-1;·-.~:: .... , .·~·' .<~ 9'/1. Ff: OF \j\l:· .,.·::-'·'' ~,,, ·"\' //f //J/ 1111 \\\I'' KING COJJNTY DEpt, 6~ DEeVE;LOP.l\lE!ff . &ENVIRONMENTAL , SERVICES (])DES) l ~ 900· Oakesdale Ave SW ~ J Renton, WA 98055al219 ~TICE OF PERMIT HEARING \\ RECOMMENDATIONS .. ' LAND USE SERVICES DMSIQN /· Request: Formal · (Subdivi~ion) Pel'lj)it . ..... . . File # & • !'lame: L03P0009,. > '· Lak:emont Court i . ._Applicant: ._Merritt Dev~lopment· /.: :" LLC; JinLM-enjtt -· \ · . '· . "· :,Location: Located•north of SE 45th : Pl and west of 160th Ave SE. 'Proposal: Subdivision-pf 1.85 acres, zoned · R6:, · into 9 · lots for single- -·. family.Units. . 1."Proj.ect Planner: Kim Claussen, . (206) 296-7).67 :,Hearing 'Date·, and· Time: .Janulµ'y 27, ·2004 at 9:3Q a.m. _:Location of Public Hearing: ODES, '.° Hearing Room : C: > · .. , ·· :$00 Oakesdale Ave-sw· \Renton, WA 98055-1219 i.))ept. Recommendation to ;Hearing Examiner: Approve subject ' to conditions. · 'Request: -Formal (Subdivision) , .Permit·.&· Rezone - 'File: L03P0005 & L03TY 401 $'ile N.tµDe: Liberty· G1;ove ~ , Contigu.cius i\JJplicar,.t: Lakeridge .. •Pevelop~:ent, .,,' W~e·Jones· " ' ·. . 1./cation: Located south of SE 136th / St, !>¢tween 160th Ave:CSJ;).: and 162nd Ave SE. · · .-Pro~sal:]~roposed Rezone 'fro~ .R-4 .... to· R-6 8Jl~ Subdivide· µIto .36 _lots · for detached si;o.gle. family resi· dences,. The :applicant 'proposes t.o · ·use:4 density credit transfers,, to plat·· the 36 lots if the rezone is .denied. . "; Project Planner: Karen Schater, . (206)296-7114 ( . ~=~\?,~~~~~~~' •rintio H9~iif>Ji{!{~!(~:;,, , . \ ::~~-f ~~·--2...i::~; ::ct, .. ,, ..... i~.~ february 10, 2004 at 9:30 a.m. l,oeatioli of Public Hearing: DDES,Hearing Room . ~ 'Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, W,t 98055-1219 iDept. Recom.µ1endation to Hearing . Examiner: . Deny the 1/R_e:z;one,. Approve the ·subdi~io.nt :., subject to conditions.:' . , · ·~ 'COlD.Illent Procedures:· ·Comments , on the above· tiles are now being. aqcepted by King Co"!'IY DD]i;S, · ·· Lang ·'trs_e Services Divisien, at t}ie · addreBB 'listed above. Pirone: 21)6- 296-<>600 . . Published in the King Qounty Jo'1_rn~_ J"'L~J!. 2004. #84566!},} . ~ ~ 0 u Ill .,s ii: z <C ~ C Affidavit of Publication 2438157 / 2 State of Washington, Counties of King and Snohomish, 01.\1. ~iiWfs~~~~;> · FIie # & Nd~: !,..03~. , Lokef$flt.12.6f(ltt~ ·. "·,.' Daniel S. O'Neal being duly sworn, says that he/she is the Authorized Agent of Seattle Times ttr.'51~\.,,11:t\a" "'··'~~·"' Company, publisher of The Seattle Times and representing the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, '""'"'"' "'""' "'"" ,, se '5th Pl ond west.of 160thAve SE. separate newspapers published daily in King and Snohomish Counties, State of Washington: •"""•'' '"'"'"'•'',,\,{;_;, h h f 1 . 1 , , "d C , d S th h h b "'"''°""'"'1 ""' 10 ""' t at t ey are newspapers o genera c1rcu at10n m sa1 ountles an tale; at t ey ave een ."""'"'•m""".'.'.',.. . .··.·' approved as legal newspapers by orders of the Superior Court of King and Snohomish ~\'.l'l..~\il""' Kim c"'""'"' Counties; that the annexed, being a classified advertisement, was published in: "'°''"" Doteo,irnme,.,.,,;·;;, 27,2Q0.4Dt9:JOo.m. , .. The Seattle Times 01/09/04 The Seattle Post-Intelligencer 01/09/04 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9" day of January, 2004 Notary Public 1 and for the State of Washington residing at Seattle MAIN FILE COPY -~~i~~~~~=~-,&1~k~r dale Ave SW<Rimtoni,WA 98055- 1211', Dept. ReoommelMkltfo,1. to Hearing· . · Exgll\l~: · · .'A~ve su_blect to conllltlolls.· ., ' _,· _ _; .. Rogers, Carol From: Rogers, Carol Sent: To: Subject: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:20 AM 'legals.bellevue@kingcountyjournal.com'; 'legals@seattletimes.com' Legal ads for publ. on Friday, 1/9 Please confirm receipt. Please publish the accompanying, legal notice in your newspaper on FRIDAY. January 9. 2004, which will meet our minimum legal notice requirement. Should this not be possible, please call or fax me immediately. Submit your invoice and 3 copies of the affidavit of publication to Accounts Payable, as soon after publication as possible, in order for us to enter legal proof of publication in our file records, and so that we may process same for payment. Attachment: Legal Notice KING COUNTY DEPT. Of DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DOES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219 NOTICE OF PERMIT HEARING & RECOMMENDATIONS LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION Request: Formal (Subdivision) Permit File# & Name: L03P0009, Lakeman! Court Applicant: Merritt Development LLC, Jim Merritt Location: Located north of SE 45th Pl and west of 160th Ave SE. Proposal: Subdivision of 1.85 acres, zoned R6, into 9 lots for single-family units. Project Planner: Kim Claussen, (206) 296-7167 Hearing Date and Time: January 27, 2004 at 9:30 a.m. Location of Public Hearing: DDES, Hearing Room 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Dept. Recommendation to Hearing Examiner: Approve subject to conditions. Request: File: File Name: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Formal (Subdivision) Permit & Rezone L03P0005 & L03TY401 Liberty Grove Contiguous Lakeridge Development, Wayne Jones Located south of SE 136'" St, between 1601" Ave SE and 162"' Ave SE. Proposed Rezone from R-4 to R-6 and subdivide into 36 lots for detached single family residences. The applicant proposes to use 4 density credit transfers to plat the 36 lots if the rezone is denied. Project Planner: Karen Scharer, (206) 296-7114 Hearing Date and Time: February 10, 2004 at 9:30 a.m. Location of Public Hearing: DDES, Hearing Room Dept. Recommendation to 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Hearing Examiner: Deny the Rezone, Approve the subdivision, subject to conditions. Request: File: File Name: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Project Planner: Formal (Subdivision) Permit & Rezone L03P0006 & L03TY 403 Liberty Grove Lakeridge Development, Wayne Jones Located north of SE 136'" St, between 1581h Ave SE and 1601h Ave SE. Proposed Rezone from R-4 to R-6 and subdivide into 24 lots for Detached single-family residences. The applicant proposes to use 5 density credit transfers to plat the 24 lots if the rezone is denied. Karen Scharer, (206) 296-7114 1 MAIN FILE COPY ® Hear,ng Date and Time: February 10, 2004 :30 a.m. Location of Public Hearing: ODES, Hearing Room 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Dept. Recommendation to Hearing Examiner: Deny the Rezone, Approve the subdivision, subject to conditions. Comment Procedures: Comments on the above files are now being accepted by King County DOES, Land Use Services Division, at the address listed above. Phone: 206-296-6600 Published this 91" day of January, 2004. cc: Accounts Payable, Administrative Services Division, ODES Application File(s): L03P0009; Lakeman! Court hearing notice L03P0005/L031 Y 401; Liberty Grove Contiguous hearing notice L03P0006/L03TY403; Liberty Grove hearing notice 2 . '1.i B.eply ~ Reply to A!I 't'1 F~rd ~ "" C?3 )( .. • ..,,, • .It. (1) • From: Tom Meagher [tom.meagher@)eastsidejournal.com] Sent: Mon 01/05/200'1 10:27 AM To: Rogers, Carol Cc: SUbject: RE: Legal ads for publ. on Friday, 1/9 Good Morning, Caroll I have received your email, and will publish the notice (Re/File Nos. L03POD09, L03P0005, LD3TY 401 , LD3POt-06, and L03TY 403) in the 1 /09,04 edition of the King County Journal. Thanks a lot, CaroL.have a terrific day! Tom Meagher Legal Advertising Representative King County Journal Newspapers Phone 425-453-4296 or 253-872-6725 Fax: 425-635-0602 ----Original Mess age---- From: Rogers, Cuol [meilto:Cuol.Rogers@)METROKC.OOITJ Sent: Monday, January 05, 200410:20 AM To: 'legals.bellevue@kingcountyjournal.com'; '1egals@Jseattletimes.com' Svhject: Legal ads for pub!. on Friday, I~ Monday, Jan 05, 2004 11 :07 AM User: plancrog Computer: DE217953 Os: Windows NT Version: 5.1 A V Legal ads for pub!. on Friday, 1/9 Rogers, Carol From: Legals [legals@seattletimes.com] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:29 AM To: Rogers, Carol Subject: RE: Legal ads for publ. on Friday, 1/9 Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Rogers, Carol [mailto:Carol.Rogers@METROKC.GOV] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:20 AM To: 'legals.bellevue@kingcountyjournal.com'; Legals Subject: Legal ads for publ. on Friday, 1/9 Please confirm_receipt. Please publish the accompanying, legal notice in your newspaper on FRIDAY. January9,~. which will meet our minimum legal notice requirement. Should this not be possible, please call or fax me immediately. Submit your invoice and 3 copies of the affidavit of publication to Accounts Payable, as_s_9Q_n_after publicatiQJl__l!!;_possible, in order for us to enter legal proof of publication in our file records, and so that we may process same for payment. Attachment: Legal Notice KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (ODES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton. WA 98055-1219 NOTICE OF PERMIT HEARING & RECOM__Ml:NDATIONS 1.,A_r,112_ l..l~E SERVICES D!\llSlON Request: Formal (Subdivision) Permit File# & Name: L03P0009, Lakemont Court Applicant: Merritt Development LLC, Jim Merritt Location: Located north of SE 45th Pl and west of 160th Ave SE. Proposal: Subdivision of 1.85 acres, zoned R6, into 9 lots for single-family units. Project Planner: Kim Claussen, (206) 296-7167 Hearing Date and Time: January 27, 2004 at 9:30 a.m. Location of Public Hearing: DDES, Hearing Room 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Dept. Recommendation to Hearing Examiner: Approve subject to conditions. Request: File: File Name: Applicant: Location: 01/05/2004 Formal (Subdivision) Permit & Rezone L03P0005 & L03TY401 Liberty Grove Contiguous Lakeridge Development, Wayne Jones Located south of SE 135th St, between 1601h Ave SE and Page 1 of2 Legal ads for pub!. on Friday, 1/9 Proposal: 152nd Ave SE. Proposed Rezone from R-4 to R-6 and subdivide into 36 lots for detached single family residences. The applicant proposes to use 4 density credit transfers to plat the 36 lots if the rezone is denied. Project Planner: Karen Scharer, (206) 296-7114 Hearing Date and Time: February 10, 2004 at 9:30 a.m. Location of Public Hearing: DOES, Hearing Room 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Dept. Recommendation to Hearing Examiner: Deny tha Rezone, Approve the subdivision, subject to conditions. Request: File: File Name: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Formal (Subdivision) Permit & Rezone L03P0006 & L03TY403 Liberty Grove Lakeridge Development, Wayne Jones Located north of SE 1361h St, between 15st11 Ave SE and 1601h Ave SE. Proposed Rezone from R-4 to R-6 and subdivide into 24 lots for Detached single-family residences. The applicant proposes to use 5 density credit transfers to plat the 24 lots if the rezone is denied. Project Planner: Karen Scharer, (206) 296-7114 Hearing Date and Time: February 10, 2004 at 9:30 a.m. Location of Public Hearing: ODES, Hearing Room 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Dept. Recommendation to Hearing Examiner: Deny the Rezone, Approve the subdivision, subject to conditions. Comment Procedures: Comments on the above files are now being accepted by King County ODES, Land Use Services Division, at the address listed above. Phone: 206-296-6600 Published this 9th day of January, 2004. cc: Accounts Payable, Administrative Services Division, DOES 01/05/2004 Application File(s): L03P0009; Lakemont Court hearing notice L03P0005/L03TY401; Liberty Grove Contiguous hearing notice L03P0006/L03TY 403; Liberty Grove hearing notice Page 2 of2 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 ·,~ti) 296-6600 HY (206) 296-7217 Application ,vr Land Use Permits Alternative formats available upon request K.C. D.D.E.S. Date Received: Stamp DO NOT WRITE ABOVE THIS DIVIDER I (Yl/e) request the following permit(s) or approval(s): Building Permit 0 Clearing & Grading Permit 0 Temporary Use Permit 0 Binding Site Plan 0 Site Development Permit O Boundary Line Adjustment 0 Short Subdivision 0 Formal Subdivision O Urban Planned Development O Plat Alteration 0 Plat Vacation 0 Road Variance 0 Drainage Variance or Adjustment O Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Shoreline Conditional Use Permit Shoreline Variance Shoreline Redesignation Zoning Variance Conditional Use Pemiit Reuse of Public Schools Special Use Permit Zone Reclassification Site Specific Comprehensive Plan Amendment P-Suffix Amendment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ff 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right-of-Way Use Permit 0 Shoreline Exemption 0 Special District Overlay Removal Reasonable Use Exception Public Agency & Utility Exception Period Review for Mining Sites Received~~-=--~ King County Hearing Elcamin I, --"L""a""ke=r~id=g-e""""De~v~e=lo~p=m=e""n"'"t""1 "'ln"'ca., __ , being duly sworn, state that I am the owner or (print name) officer of the corporation owning property described in the legal description filed with this application and that I have reviewed the rules and regulations of the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) regarding the preparation and filing of this application and that all statements, answers and information submitted with this application are in all respects true, accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. /l,f4//,j During the review of this application, it may be neces a By signing this application form, you are giving permis io owner hereby agrees to notify tenants of possible site v, it Wane Jones printed name PO Box 146 /ZE1171Jt,f J:11.. ake one or more site visits'!" Copy f , is rental property, the Lakeridge Development For Formal Subdivisions only: Liberty Grove Subdivision Name of Subdivision Paul Morrow Registered Land Surveyor Mel Daley Engineer Lakeridge Development, Inc. Developer Land Surveyor's Certification I hereby certify that the accompanying plat has been inspected by me and conforms to all rules and regulations of the platting resolution and standards for King County, Washington Signe~l ~I I. I I,<..,?. Date: ":!:>\ ~ u.= DMP Engineering Name 726 Auburn Way N., Auburn WA 98002 Address and Zip (253) 333-2200 PH. (253) 333-2206 FAX Telephone Number DMP Engineering Name 726 Auburn Way N., Auburn WA 98002 Address and Zip Wayne Jones, Jr. Name PO Box. 146, Renton, WA 98057 Address and Zip (425)228-9750 Telephone Number Land Surveyor Seal Note: Application forms and submittal requirements are subject to revision without notice. ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Senices Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, \,Vashington 98055-1219 (206)296-6600 TIY(206)296-7217 Certification •ransfer of Applicant Status Alternative formats available upon request I, l /J/,-. , (print name) hereby certify that I am an/the owner of the property hich is the subject of this pplication for permit or approval. If I am not the sole owner of the property, I certify that I am authorized by any and all other owners of the property to make this certification and transfer any an all rights I/we have to apply for this permit or approval to the person listed below. I, therefore certify that Wayne Jones, JR. (print name) is the "applicant" for this permit or approval and shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless "applicant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. By being the "applicant," that individual assumes financial responsibility for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. · n?Efi>el)lllly,Qt · the laws of the State of Washington that the twAJ;T A-(Y~ -; 1M%b I FOR INDIVIDUALS: I, , (print name) hereby certify that I am the "applicant" for this permit or approval. I shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless "applicant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. · I accept financial responsibility for all fees associated with this permit or approval and will receive any refunds. My mailing address is: IT5)~~rEri~~rr}1 ln) MAR 1 1 2003 [1I• I certify under penalty of pe~ury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is~ aty:l[}p~t. Signature of Applicant . Date Signed OR FOR CORPORATIONS/BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS: I, Wayne Jone, JR. , hereby certify that I am an authorized agent of Lakeridge Develpment a corporation of other business association authorized in the State of Washington and that this business association is the "applicant" for this permit or approval and is financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. This association shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless "applicant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. The mailing address of this business association is: L "d e Develo ment Inc. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Senices Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (206) 296-6600 TIY (206) 296-7217 Certification & Transfer of Applicant Status Alternative formats available upon request I, , (print name) hereby certify that I am an/the owner o e perty which is the of this application for permit or approval. If I am not the sole owner of the property, I certify that I am authorized by any and all other owners of the property to make this certification and transfer any an all rights I/we have to apply for this permit or approval to the person listed below. I, therefore certify that Wayne Jones, JR. (print name) is the "applicant" for this permit or approval and shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless "applicant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. By being the "applicant," that individual assumes financial responsibility for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. I certify under penalty of erjury der the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. '2"'f ~~ 'Lo03 -~~~~=-~~fuj;~Fe~efrr;:--------~igned FOR INDIVIDUALS: I, , (print name) hereby certify that I am the "applicant" for this permit or approval. I shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless "applicant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. I accept financial responsibility for all fees associated with this permit or approval and will receive any refunds. My mailing address is: I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature of Applicant OR Date Signed FOR CORPORATIONS/BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS: t,·-~w!.!.!:a!Lyn,.,,e:e...,cJo,,,n"-'ee.,..,,_J.,_,R, .. _ ---------------------' hereby certify that I am an authorized agent of Lakeridqe Develpment a corporation of other business association authorized in the State of Washington and that this business association is the "applicant" for this permit or approval and is financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. This association shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless "applicant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. The mailing address of this business association is: Lakeridge Development, Inc. ·ury under the laws of the State of Washington Kmg County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (206)296-6600 TIY(206)296-7217 Certification & Transfer of Applicant Status Alternative formats available upon request ~411 , (print name) hereby certify that I am an/the owner of the property ich is the subject of this application for permit or approval. If I am not the sole owner of the property, I certify that I am authorized by any and all other owners of the property to make this certification and transfer any an all rights I/we have to apply for this permit or approval to the person listed below. I, therefore certify that Wayne Jones. JR. (print name) is the "applicant" for this permit or approval and shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless "applicant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. By being the "applicant," that individual assumes financial responsibility for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature of Owner /,-:;, ?-v.3 Date Signed FOR INDIVIDUALS: I, , (print name) hereby certify that I am the "applicant" for this permit or approval. I shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless "applicant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. I accept financial responsibility for all fees associated with this permit or approval and will receive any refunds. My mailing address is: I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature of Applicant Date Signed OR FOR CORPORATIONS/BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS: 1.,-Wayne Jone, JR. , hereby certify that I am ari authorized agent of Lakeridge Develpment a corporation of other business association authorized in the State of Washington and that this business association is the "applicant" for this permit or approval and is financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. This association shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless "applicant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. The mailing address of this business association is: Lakerid e Develo ment Inc. NOTICE TO APPLICANTS: By law, this department returns all engineering and other plans to the applicant. If, however, you wish to authorize the department to return engineering and other plans directly to the engineer, architect, or other consultant for the limited purpose of making corrections, please designate below: r;i I authorize this department to return plan directly to my consultant(s) for the limited purpose of making corrections as designated on this form. CONSULTANTS: ___________________ _ DMP Engineering 726 Auburn Way N. Auburn, WA 98002 (253) 333-2200 Phone (253) 333-2206 Fax 1 ............. ~ ................... ..ir Order No.: 10090460 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL C: ALL OF LOT 7 IN BLOCK 1, AND THAT PORTION LOT 6 IN BLOCK 1 LYING SOUTHERLY OF A LINE BEGINNING ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 6, AT A POINT 12.3 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; AND RUNNING WESTERLY TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 6 AT A POINT 4.8 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE AS SAID LINE WAS ESTABLISHED BY JUDGMENT ENTERED JANUARY 29, 1969 IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 691199, ALL IN ]ANETT'S RENTON BOULEVARD TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 60, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY AUDITOR; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. !Ri [E ~ ~ ~ 117 IE} rJ fli MAR 11 2003 I.W MAIN FILE CQpy ' ,,-".! Q. ~-., • ') ' " .. •• ... ., V ' ~ .. " l! l( I I- d:) '°I ' : .... • • .. V I, • ~ ... • " ... £ ... Q~'Q 7 ., .. 0 " V ~ ' • ~ i,.r • V I :,o . 0 ~ I "'t, ' ~: ""'· c•' • v --~,30--"'i • 1t1,. I~ t\·1t.0 1 T 0 I I- 0 <O .., rr-. ... 0 .., • .~ ~:i l:\::i 'S ., • •• ~ . .. • .. .. ~ . . ... .... ~ 3 " • ... ~2 ........ ~ · . .. /· " 7'!."!, ,. ' .. • .. .2 ~ J. .. • Q ~ 0 ~ .J.~4 ' • ~ / 130 .7 3 S. E. I 3 6TH. ST. ,.,~ fl" N 87-40-11 W SE 14 -23-5 Tnis sketch is provided. wu:hout charge, for you; iniormaoon. It is not im~nded to show all matters reiated to the propertv includmg, but not limited ta, area, dimensions, easements, en- croachments. or locaoon oi boundaries. It is not a part of, nor does it modify, the commitment or policv to which it ts aa:acned. Tne Company assumes NO LIABIUTY for any matter related to this skerch. References should be made to an accurate survey for further information. Feb-11-03 04:22P Lakeridge Oeveloprr~nt @) King County :ODES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 900 Oakcsd~le Avenue Southwest Renton, wa 98055-1219 425 228 7232 Th'1s certificate prov·1ctes ltl~ Seattle Krng County Department of Pub!ic Health and the Department of Developnicnt and Environmental Services with informat'1on necessary to evaluate development L.!:~o_,_•_''-·----------~ King County Certificate of Water Availability [ Do not write 1n ttll'j box· nL1mbcr ___ _ ---------· -----name ' 0 Building Permit 0 Preliminary Plat or PUD D Short Subdivision CJ Rezone or other ___ _ P.Ol Applicant's name: Lakerfdge PeYeloomont Wayne )ones Proposed use: Sioaie F~rriily Res~ Location: 136xx 160 SE (attach map and legal descrlpti ::in if necessary} ill)~t~~~~~ ln1 MAR 11 2003 -· Water purveyor information: !{_C. D.D.E.S !. D ,. Water will be provided by service connection only 10 an existing 8" (size) water main that is f.rpntinq tho site. l;;J b. Water service will require an lrnprovement to the \l''iJtcr systen1 of: D (1) feet of water main to reach the sit:; and/or D {i) The construction of a distribution system or \t1e :;Jtc; and/or ~ {3) Other (describe): off site improvements on 160' requirt!d, also easements and on site improvements required. DE is required. 2. ~ ,. The water system is in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive pl.in. OR D b. Tlie water system improvement Is not in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive rlan and will requite a water comprehensive plan amendment (This may cause a deiuy in issubnce of a permit or approval). 3. i;J a. The proposed project is within the c:orporatt! limits i:>f the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of seMce outside the distncc or dtv, or is within the County approved service area or a private water purveyor. OR D b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board (BFlB) apprcval wHf be necessary to provide. service. 4. pq ,. Water is or will be available at the rate of now and duration Indicated below at no less thar1 20 psi measured at the nearest (ire hydrant 60' feet from the bullding/prop~rty ( or as marked on the attached map): Rate or flaw at Peak Dem,;md Duration D less man 500 9pm (approx. gpm) D less than 1 Mur D 500 to 999 gpm CJ 1 hour to 2 hours [I 1000 gpm or more ~ 2 hours or more O flaw test of gpm D 0 calculation of gpm ottier (Note: Commcrcra! buildjng permits which include:; mu!tira111/ly struc:tl.Jres require flow te$t er calculation.) OR 0 b. W<;1ter system is not capable of providing fire now. 5, 181 a. water system hc1s certifteates of water right or water right claims sufficient to provide scrvjc8. OR D b. Water system c.loes not currently have necessary wo:1ter rights or wdter right dalms. Comments/conditions: GFC $3,20Q.OO per lot Water Avallability ea(~~ lot, Meter Drop $450.00 each. FEES SUBJECT TQ CHANG! WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE I certify that the above water purveyor information is true. This ce"tific.ation shall be valid for lyear from date of signature. KING COUNiY WATER DISTRICT #90 LESTER PIELE RENEWAL FEES: W/ lN 1 YEAR$~ s::::::::ENT ~~~~ AElltlX::z~;JV /:!£.1:,c Title SlgnatU--Dare 1, 11;; CQp C;\My Documents Reception\Watcr Availability\Laker1dge\wc1yne jones.doc y • ~~ '.i('.;) tf"tl'C~ -£; -'.~ Jesse Tanner. Mayor April 5, 2002 Mel Daley DMP, Inc. 726 Auburn Way North Auburn, WA 98002 CI'J.''\__ '-.)"F I~NTON PlanninglBuilding/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E~ Administrator SUBJECT: SANITARY SEWER AVAILABILITY -LIBERTY PLAT 59 LOT PLAT -KCPID NO 145750-0085 & 0090, 366450-041 LAKERIDGEDEVELOPMENT Dear Mr. Daley This letter shall supplement the sewer availability document for the subject project dated April 5, 2002. Sanitary sewer service is available to this proposed plat. Service will require the extension of sewer as follows: o Extension of approximately 2600 linear feet of 12-inch sewer main in SE 136th Street from I 52"<l Avenue SE to 162"-"-Avenue SE. -- o Extension of approximately 600 linear feet of I o:::mcli-sewer-inain along the frontage oftfos · - proposed plat in 162"" Avenue SE, 800 linear feet of8-inch sewer main in 160th Avenue SE, and 300 linear feet of 8-inch sewer main in 1581 • Avenue SE. o Extension of 8-inch sanitary sewer main within the plat to serve the proposed lots. o Installation of a city-owned sewer lift station at a location to be determined to be pumped up to the new main in SE 136th Street. This lift station shall be sized to incorporate flows from this proposed plat as well as the contributory flows from the basin and flows from Liberty High School. The items listed above assume that projects currently under consideration would not move forward. The City has currently issued sewer availabilities to two developments that front on SE : -. .,-th ~•-.~~ : c; dco.-..:,;:,,• ,-~ .,.J •• ~-;-,.~,! ,..l --~,.ec.-+~-':1~' _ _.,:1·1· ~~ :..,'"'",t-,-,. .._i.;,, ....,,..,.,..-1.f",....-:-t-l,.,,. .,,.,..t-o..-c--ir_...,. ;.,. ~h 11.hth ~f'rp,c,.f .. JD Ll .. dlc, 1.1 t, .... 11..lpC::u, .,Nl,.;L....U..p...,.l..,.I-.,U.l.f "--l h .. tu ....... -,u ........ ~_.-....._ , __ .. ,. ..... ,_~_ ....... ..,..~ •• ~. ;._,,~ .. __ -----· We also are currently reviewing an application that comes from your office for a development that fronts on 162nd Avenue SE, proposed by David Petrie. It is the City's recommendation that these developments work in partnership to help minimize the total amount of fam_·e~g,yr~, n O C i r_. especially lift stations, to serve this area. I n1 u; ll!7 l::, u \W ~ Sewer service is subject to the following fees: .n HAR 1 1 2003 Side Sewer Permit System Devclopmci1t Charge East Renton Special Assessment District Charge Right-of Way Fee Right-ot~Way Bond King County Permit Fee Plan Review and Inspection Fees $60 per lot !<.C. 0.D.E.S $7 60 per lot . $224.52 plus interest,"'4JN f:/lr, _ $90 ,;;:COpydY I 00% of estimated construction costs < I\ 100% of actual billings by King County \ · 5% of estimated construction costs --------l-05_5_S-ou_t_h_G_r_ad_y_W_ay---R-c_n_to_n_,_W_a_s_hi_n_g_to_n_9_80_5_5 ________ RE N TO N 6i?}Thispapercontan1S.':iO%re-cydedmale1iJl,30%pc,stconsumer L,D!'P°b~ Md Daley, DMP, Inc. April 5, 2002 Page2 Sewer service is also subject to the following conditions: o All roadway pavement sections shall meet the City's minimum standard of 4-inches of asphalt on 6-inches of crushed surfacing top course. o Property owner shall be required to sign a covenant to annex document prior to issuance of any sewer permits by the City of Renton for sewer service. If you have any questions regarding this letter or availability certificate, please contact me at (425) 430-7212. ~ ///7.I} ' / / ?/ ~~lw-- w astewater Utility Supervisor -------------~~-''-~ .---------- l l:\DIVIS!ON.S\UTIL!TIE.S\DOCS\2002\2002-219.doc\DMC:lf SANITARY SEWER A Y All.ABILITY FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESu.lt;NTIAL BUILDING CITY OF RENTON 105SSGnod}'Wry, --WA ,allSS l'looao: (425) 4»-721111 Fax: (-125) .t».'1300 TO IE Al I J.POUf Bf APPi l[ANf: -.-Requrst I 10-Wtti Ml Afyli,:..JsName: ,~~ liEI Mailing Addr=: I ?o. 'foox:. 1-4&, Cityj~J Cba:kooc: fuJpo,u:I SioglcFamily fbnc D E,osring Single Family Heme Ot SqKic D Otbcr(Spc:cify) 1 ~ '9.-l@-J\~©J I Loet1ion1Address:! '.§EJ%i!!. '=>I-@ \/,cb'Jfr p."J'f=:_ -S.~ f ::;:;,);,; ~ "--- I. O Sanitary Scwe< Savice will be providal by side scwa-cabldioo ooly lo an crislmg C:=J si2le""""' moat loc*rl within or D or 0 City rooon1s shaw a si<ie sewer Slob lo th, JnlPCrtY ON D Sanitary= scrncc will ro:pmc"" CX1Wsim of .,..xu,iu,.aly ~----------~ of I jsm: scwamain localed widun ~~====;------------~ The --~ lies wilhioj !service 31<3; lh=lore, the applicanl ,hall O<Illact TheDislrid/Aga,cyat~)for=availability. Sceanachcd -~cd 1. ~ ~ 2a1z.... Payma,tofallawlicablcsysian~k= p~p ~ (F<= ""'~ ., chaog,: wil!JooLnolicc) -5¥stan Devdq,mcnt Omigc $ 1§!! -Residmtial building ,.,.....,-pamit $ " -L.vcu.aoa s, ,pccial ""' , o• l«s: s s s -Right of Way Fee s -Rigbl of Way Buod (Refundable) s s s (....-) Sanitary Sewer Availability Fmm Page 2 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. or Applicant shall abandon tl,c CJtisting septic system in =mJance with Section 1119 of tl,c rurrent Unifoon Plumbing Code and Section 44010.16 of 1be CiJy Co<k. Customer.. connecting to sanitary scw<XS in King County, including Rroton' s Sewer Service Al"°, afu:,-February 1, 1990, are subject lo a sewage n,:atment c:qx,city charge. The pwposc of this King C.ounty charge is to pay f<T building sewage treatment capociJy to serve newly coonocted customers. Singlc-lamily customers M' S 10.50 a month (billed by King County as $63 every six mootbs) foe 15 :,,::,rs. At !he customer's choice, this fee may be paid to King County as a lump sum of $1,089.40. This fee is in additi<n lo the monthly charge for tro!lmenl that Renton is n:quiredto col1cct and pa.~ to King Oiunty. TI1e Rcntoo portion of lhe Wastewater Utility Rates tor customers outside the city limits is l.5 times lbe slan<lard rate forcustomasinsi<k the city limits. (CiJy Code section S..5-15C) TI,c proposed project is within tlx: corporalc limits of the City of Rcnton or has l=, granted King Coualy Bo=d.,ry lkview .l3ooro (ERB) "Pl'Jllval for exkusion of =vie<: outside tlie City .. V Annexation or ll!IB approval will be n=sary for the provision of sanitary s,.-wer =vice. A., sewer syskm improvement is in confcnnance with a County approved sewer OOf!ll)lrlx:nsi plan. or Ik sewer systcrn -improvancnt will ~rire an arocndr:n::nt. to the Rent.on Long-Range W astcwater Management Plan. --"~----~ sewer system improvemc,it will be within an existing franchise from King County allowing the installati<Jn of ' fucililics in lbe Coualy Righ!(s )-Of Way. or Tix: sewer syskm improvement will ro<Juire that Rentrn obtain a franchise from King County to install lhe facilities in lbe County Rjgbt(s}-ofWay. CONUCHQNS OF CEKrIHC.XJlON: l) It is lhc responsibibty of the owner/developer to verily, by an engu,cering study, whcthcr it IS possible to axmect by gravity bne to the existing City s,.-wcr system ( a private lift station may be installed, but is not <ksirabie ). The City may ~ at it's option, the verification to he in the form of a ld1a: sigricd.by a pnlb·~ional civil engineer. 2) When new sanililly sewer bncs ""' installed, the City typically inslalls or requrn,s to have installed stub-outs to the property btlC. This is done as a courtesy to the llffiperly owners. Tix: City does not guaranlce a stub for all properties nor does it guarantee the condition or location of lhc stub. It is the n::spoosibility of the owner/C-OD!raclor:.lo ha.Ye an.approved _coo:ncction from the building sewer to I.he City's SC\Ver main. lf there is a stub~ it is in g'Xld condition, and the ownedcooiractor-can .locate jt,. then it is available for use. 1be detamination of condition of e;w;ting_sanitny sewer stubs shall be the sole =!)OOSibilily of the City and the City's decision shall be fmal. ff the sluh is hmkcn or the City inspector dci.crmines that the stub's condition is not acceptabfe, it shall be U-.e ownaiconlractor's n:spoo.sibility to rq>air the stub, Jql1ace the stub at the existing tee. oc to install a m.-w stub and tee Ju=tly inlo lhc main. The method of rq,airhq,lacem=t to be dctennined by tl1c City's inspector. J hereby certify that tl,c above sanitary sewer infonnation is true. This ccrtificatim shall be valid fa one y= from date of signat,=. (Fee ttlfom,ation is s.uhjcct to change without notice). /wwavail.doc FORM DC905-400l l l/20/00 DeJ}artn1ent of Development and Enviroruuental Services ® King County SOOOakcsdaleAvenue F1·re D1·str1·ct Rece1·pt Rr.nton, WA 98055-1219 Fire District # __ d_,-_5 ___ _ Name of Project / Proposal ---'L=-1_· b_e_r_t-=y_G'-r'-o"-v-'-=-e-=P-=r:...:e:..:l=-1=-· m=i::.::n.=a..::r_.y__,P:...:l=-a=-t-=---------------- Location of Project/ Proposal 160 Ave. SE & SE 136th St. (Address, parcel number, tax account number, legal description)* *One of these required for processing of application 366450-0141 SEC __ 1_4 ___ _ TWN __ 2_3 ____ _ RNG. --=5 ____ _ KROLL PAGE _____ _ Telephone Number ___ ..:_( _4_2_5..:_)_2_2_8_-_9_7_5_0 ______________ -*-P.-----A-fl--F-'a;--- Description: Type of Project/ Proposal Check appropriate box(es) D Apartment/ Multifamily D Duplex D Commercial / Industrial XXSubdivision D Conditional Use D Unconditional Use D Retail D Short Subdivision/ Short Plat D Planned Unit Development D School / Classroom D Residential: Single Family Residence D Rezone DOther (describe)-------------------------------- D Storz couplings required on Fire Hydrants Distribution: White: Applicant (see below) Yellow: King County Building Services Division Pink: Fire District Note Applicant: at the time of application to ODES the white copy must be presented with project/ proposal submittal. 0178 (Rev. 9/97) Fire District: mail yellow copy to: King County Building Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Renton, WA 98055-1219 Attn: Fire Engineering M"IN FILE COPY ./06/03 17:H F.U 4256463517 COMMONWEALTH Commonwealth L..MID Tn1.E COMPAH't' OF PUGET SOUNl. U.C . February 05, 2003 ' DMP Engineering, Inc . . Attn: Sean : 726 Auburn Way North · Kent, WA 98002 Re; Order No.: Your Reference No.: Title Officer: 900-~ Job~ Troy St. George ~001 Buyer/Borrower(s): Seller{s): David S. Platt and Geo1-gia Platt, trustees of the Platt Family Revocable Living Trust; Wilma J. Bowen, trustee, Revocable Trust of Virgil E. Bowen and Wilma J. Bowen, dated January 31, 19; ; and Subject Property: 13612 16oth Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98059, King County 13544 150th Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98059, King County 13535 150th Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98059, King County Order Su111mary Thank you for placing this order with Commor,wealth Land ntte Company of Puget Sound. If you need assistance on this file, please contact: Troy St. George (425) 646·3515 tst.george@landam.com Patti Williams {425) 646·S39S 11atriciawilliams@landam.com Lindsay Cornelius (425) 646·5391 lcornelius@landam.com Bryan Dow (425) 646·3514 bdow@landam.com 1·800-45!5·1105 Fax: (425) ,546-3517 Additional copies have been sent to: Cover p;age WA.09.01.0C C()mm.ouwe"1dl Lusd Tide Company of Pug,::, S0W2d 14450 NE 29th Pim; Suia,::00, Bclkvuc, WA 98007 Phone: 800--!55-1105 F,x: 42S-646-:J517 KC. D.D.E.S ""NFrtEco~ u~ftXJ06 JZ/06103 1T:4}_FAI 425646J51T COl!JIONWEALTII li:lJ 002 «TO___RSP_Namc_2» ifO...l\SP _Add=,_1>, «TO...RS!' _t.dd=,_2», «TO_RSP _CitySo, Phone: «TO..llSl' _?honc_Numbcn, Fax: «TO....RSP _F,,_Numbco, «Name» Attn: «Attention» · «Address1», «Address2 .. «City», «State» «Zip_ Code" Re: Order 1110.: Your Reference No.: 900·10090460 .. reference» Buyer/Borrower(s): Seller(s): David S. Platt and Georgia Platt, trustees of the Platt Family Revocable Living Trust; Wilma J. Bowen, trustee, Revocable Trust of Virgil E. Bowen and Wilma l. Bowen, dated January 31, 19; ; and Subject Property: 13612 160th Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98059, King County 13644 160th Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98059, King County 13535 160th Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98059, l<Jng County SUPPLEMENTAL NO. 1 (UPDATE #1) TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 10090460 The following matters affect the title to the property cov,ired by our preliminary commitment: TI-IERE HAVE BEEN NO CHAIIIGES TO OUR ORIGINAL GUARANTEE EXCEPT1HE FOLLOWING: The tax paragraphs have been amended as follows: GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES and SERVICE CHARGES, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if a1y, a~er delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) Tax Account No.1 Year 2003 1457500085 Billed $3,487.75 Paid $0.00 Balance $3,487.75 The effective date of the above referenced preliminary c,immitment Is hereby extended to the date of this supplemental subject, however, to any previously issuec supplementals and to the addition of the Items described above. Dated: «add_date_down_date» Supplemental -Full Date Down WA..!..LOB.00 Page 1 of 2 J2/06!03 li:42 BX 425646J51i COl!MO~llllALTH Total amount due, not including interest and penalty: $3,487.75. Levy Code: Assessed Value Land: Assessed Value Improvements: (Covers PARCEL A) 6870 $129,000.00 $144,000.00 i4J OOJ Order No.: <Ord_Id» Page 2 of 2 GENERAL PROPER1YTAXES and SERVICE CHARGES, as follows, together with Interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) Ti!X Account No.: Year 2003 2002 1457500090 Billed $4,193.43 3,926.37 Paid $0.00 $1,963.19 Balance $4,193.43 $1,963.18 Total amount due, not including interest anj penalty: $6,156.61. Levy Code: Assessed Value Land: Assessed Value Improvements: (Covers PARCEL BJ 6870 $165,000.00 $165,000.00 GENERAL PROPERTY ,AXES and SERVICE CHARGES, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) Tax Account No,: Year 2003 3664500141 Billed $5,245.50 Paid $0.00 Balance $5,245.50 Total amount due, not including interest and penalty: $5,250.50, Levy Code: Assessed Value Land: Assessed Value Improvements: (Covers PARCEL C) 6870 $160,000.00 $255,000.00 Commonwealth Land Tltle Insurance Company is a Penrsylvania corporation, a who!ly owned subsidiary of LandAmerica Flnanc!al Group, Inc., and is in no way affi'iated or connected with Commonwealth Tltle Company of Pierce County, Washington. Supplernenta.1-Full Date Down Commonwealth LANO m'lE COMPANY OF PUGET SOUND, LLC January 07, 2003 DMP Engineering, Inc. Attn: Sean 726 Auburn Way North Kent, WA 98002 Re: Order No.: 900-10090460 Your Reference No.: Job# 01470 ntle Officer: Buyer/Borrower(s): Seller(s): Troy St. George David S. Platt and Georgia Platt, trustees of the Platt Family Revocable Living Trust; Wilma J. Bowen, trustee, Revocable Trust of Virgil E. Bowen and Wilma J. Bowen, dated January 31, 19; ; and Subject Property: 13612 160th Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98059, King County 13644 160th Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98059, King County 13535 160th Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98059, King County Order Summary Thank you for placing this order with Commonwealth Land Title Company of Puget Sound. If you need assistance on this file, please contact: Troy St. George (425) 646-3515 tst.george@landam.com Patti Williams ( 425) 646-5398 patriciawilliams@landam.com Lindsay Cornelius (425) 646-5391 lcornelius@landam.com Bryan Dow (425) 646-3514 bdow@landam.com 1-800-455-1105 Fax: (425) 646-3517 Additional copies have been sent to: Lakeridge Development, Wayne Jones Cover Page WA.09.01.00 Commonwealth Land Title Company of Puget Sound 14450 NE 29th Place, Suite 200, Bellevue, \VA 98007 Phone: 800-455-1105 Fax: 425-646-3517 COMMONWEALTH DMP Engineering, Inc. Attn: Sean 726 Auburn Way North Kent, WA 98002 RE: Job# 01470 Order No.: 900-10090460 Liability: Charge: Total: SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE $ 0.00 ($ 1.00) ($ 1.00) Subject to the Exclusions from Coverage, the limits of liability and other prov1s1ons of the Conditions and Stipulations hereto annexed and made a part of this Guarantee, and subject to the further exclusion and limitation that no guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the identity of any party named or referred to in Schedule A or with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a corporation herein called the Company, GUARANTEES the Assured named in Schedule A against actual monetary loss or damage not exceeding the liability amount stated herein which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. Dated: December 17, 2002 By Authorized Signature Subdivision Guarantee WA.12.11.00 Commonwealth Land Tide Company of Puget Sound 14450 NE 29th Place, Suite 200, Bellevue, WA 98007 Pbone: 800-455-1105 Fa.s: 425-646-3517 Page 1 of 10 Order No.: 10090460 SCHEDULE A 1. Name of Assured: DMP Engineering, Inc. and 2. Date of Guarantee: December 17, 2002 3. The assurances referred to on the face page hereof are: a. That according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matters affecting title to the following described land: See Exhibit A attached hereto. b. Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in: David S. Platt and Georgia Platt, trustees of the Platt Family Revocable Living Trust, as to Parcel A; Wilma J. Bowen, trustee, Revocable Trust of Virgil E. Bowen and Wilma J. Bowen, dated January 31, 1994, as to Parcel B; Guy E. Platz, Carl E. Platz Jr., Germain Platz and Ross E. Johnson, each as to their respective separate estate, as to Parcel C c. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this Guarantee is: A fee simple estate Subject to the Exceptions shown below, which are not necessarily shown in order of their priority. EXCEPTIONS: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies or assessments on land or by the public records. 2. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or, (d) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), (c) or (d) are shown by the public records. 3. Real Estate Excise Tax pursuant to the authority of RCW Chapter 82.45 and subsequent amendments thereto. As of the date herein, the tax rate for said property is 1. 78%. 4. GENERAL PROPER1Y TAXES and SERVICE CHARGES, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) Tax Account No.: Year 2002 2003 Subdivision Guarantee 1457500085 Billed $3,197.29 "NOT YET AVAILABLE" Paid $3,197.29 Balance $0.00 Page 2 of 10 Total amount due, not including interest and penalty: $0.00. Levy Code: Assessed Value Land: Assessed Value Improvements: (Covers PARCEL A) 6870 $122,000.00 $128,000.00 Order No.: 10090460 5. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES and SERVICE CHARGES, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) Tax Account No.: Year 2002 2003 1457500090 Billed $3,926.37 "NOT YET AVAILABLE" Paid $1,963.19 Balance $1,963.18 Total amount due, not including interest and penalty: $1,963.18. Levy Code: Assessed Value Land: Assessed Value Improvements: (Covers PARCEL BJ 6870 $156,000.00 $153,000.00 6. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES and SERVICE CHARGES, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) Tax Account No.: Year 2002 2003 3664500141 Billed $4,914.69 "NOT YET AVAILABLE" Paid $4,914.69 Balance $0.00 Total amount due, not including interest and penalty: $0.00. Levy Code: Assessed Value Land: Assessed Value Improvements: (Covers PARCEL C) 6870 $151,000.00 $238,000.00 7. Notice of tap or connection charges which have been or will be due in connection with development or re-development of the land as disclosed by recorded instrument. Inquiries regarding the specific amount of the charges should be made to the city/county/agency. CITY /COUNTY/ AGENCY: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: Subdivision Guarantee KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 90 AUGUST 30, 1995 9508301698 Page 3 of 10 Order No.: 10090460 8. NON-SEGREGATION COVENANT imposed by instrument recorded on JANUARY 15, 1981, under Recording No. 8101150638. (Covers PARCEL C) 9. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDmONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDING NO. (Covers PARCEL C) A RESERVE DRAIN AREA A PORTION OF PARCEL C 8505170859 10. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDmONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDING NO. (Covers PARCEL C) INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE DRAINFIELD PORTION OF AN ON- SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM THE EAST 130 FEET OF THE NORTH 30 FEET OF PARCEL C 8505240859 11. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDmONS THEREOF: RECORDED: MARCH 20, 1980 RECORDING NO.: 8003200605 REGARDING: WATER LINE CONSTRUCTION COSTS (Covers PARCEL B) 12. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon the land herein described as granted to KING COUNTY by deed recorded under Recording No. 7908160751. (Covers PARCEL B) 13. MATTERS SET FORTH BY SURVEY: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: DISCLOSES: (Covers PARCELS A & B) Subdivision Guarantee FEBRUARY 16, 1988 8802169004 A FENCE ALONG THE SOUTH DOES NOT REPRESENT THE TRUE BOUNDARY LINE Page 4 of 10 Order No.: 10090460 14. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITTONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: (Covers PARCEL A) PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY. A WASHINGTON CORPORATION UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION LINES AND ABOVE GROUND CABINETS AS DESCRIBED THEREIN MARCH 23, 1988 8803230765 15. DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITTONS AND RESTRICTIONS imposed by instrument recorded on NOVEMBER 9, 1993, under Recording No. 9311090539. (Covers PARCEL C) 16. ALL COVENANTS, CONDITTONS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, EASEMENTS OR OTHER SERVITUDES, IF ANY, DISCLOSED BY THE BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9410250673. RIGHTS OR BENEFITS, IF ANY, WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY THE RECORDED DOCUMENT(S) ABOVE AFFECTING LAND OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARY DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE A. (Covers PARCEL A) 17. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITTONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDING NO. (Covers PARCEL A) ON-SITE SANITATION AS DESCRIBED THEREIN 9501201073 18. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITTONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDING NO. (Covers PARCEL A) ON-SITE SANITATION AS DESCRIBED THEREIN 9507281416 19. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITTONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDING NO. (Covers PARCEL A) Subdivision Guarantee DRAIN FIELD AS DESCRIBED THEREIN 9508020778 Page 5 of 10 Order No.; 10090460 20. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDffiONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDING NO. (Covers PARCEL A) INSTALLATION, OPERATION, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF A DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND RELATED PIPING FOR THE ON-SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM AS DESCRIBED THEREIN 9802241785 21. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDffiONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDING NO. (Covers PARCEL C) INSTALLATION, OPERATION, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF A DRAINFIELD AND RELATED PIPING FOR THE ON-SITE SEWER SYSTEM FOR LOT 3 BEGINNING AT A POINT 200 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT D; THENCE WEST TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT C; THENCE 90° SOUTH 119 FEET; THENCE 90° EAST FOR 130 FEET; THENCE 90° NORTH TO POINT OF BEGINNING 9802241786 22. NOTICE OF ON-SITE SEWAGE SYSTEM, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS imposed by instrument recorded on JUNE 11, 2001, under Recording No. 20010611000030. (Covers PARCEL C) 23. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ADDRESS: LOAN NO.: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: (Covers PARCEL B) Subdivision Guarantee WILMA J. BOWEN AND VIRGIL E. BOWEN, WHO ACQUIRED TITLE AS JEAN BOWEN, HUSBAND AND WIFE UNITED STATES NATIONAL BANK OF OREGON U.S. BANK OF WASHINGTON, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 501 SE HAWTHORNE BLVD #301, PORTLAND, OR 97208 $51,951.69 FEBRUARY 4, 1994 FEBRUARY 8, 1994 9402080178 Page 6 of 10 Order No.: 10090460 24. DEED OF TRUST SECURING A LINE OF CREDIT AND THE TERMS AND CONDillONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: GERMAIN PLATZ AND CARL EDWARD PLATZ AND GUY EMERSON PLATZ (SISTER & BROTHERS) AND ROSS JOHNSON CHICAGO TITLE INS. CO., A MISSOURI CORPORATION WASHINGTON MUTUAL SAVINGS BANK, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION $10,000.00 MARCH 22, 1994 MARCH 29, 1994 9403292427 Investigation should be made to determine the present balance owed by contacting the appropriate lender/agency/individual. NOTE: CAUTION SHOULD BE EXERCISED TO ENSURE THAT A RECONVEYANCE WILL BE OBTAINED. (Covers PARCEL C) 25. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ADDRESS: LOAN NO.: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: (Covers PARCEL B) Subdivision Guarantee WILMA J. BOWEN, TRUSTEE, REVOCABLE TRUST OF VIRGIL E. BOWEN AND WILMA J. BOWEN, DATED JANUARY 31, 1994 TIMBERLAND SERVICE CORP., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION TIMBERLAND BANK 624 SIMPSON AVE., HOQUIAM, WA 98550 970122867 $40,000.00 MARCH 5, 2001 MARCH 9, 2001 20010309000070 Page 7 of 10 Order No.: 10090460 26. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: -ADDRESS: LOAN NO.: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: (Covers PARCEL B) WILMA JEAN BOWEN CHICAGO mLE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION LACEY OMALLEY AGENCY 601 3RD AVE. SEATTLE WA 98104 $150,000.00 DECEMBER 8, 2001 DECEMBER 18, 2001 20011218001886 27. LIEN FOR LABOR AND/OR MATERIALS. CLAIMANT: AGAINST: COMMENCED: CEASED: AMOUNT: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: (Covers PARCEL A) MICHAEL LEE RITTER DAVID PLATT MAY 1, 2001 DECEMBER 30, 2001 $995.00 MARCH 22, 2002 20020322002215 28. Terms and conditions of the Trust under which title is claimed. A copy of the trust and amendments, if any, must be submitted for our review. Any proposed transaction must comply with the conditions provided for in RCW 11.100.140 and/or RCW 11.110.020. 29. The land described in this commitment appears to be residential in nature and may be subject to the provisions of R.C.W.6.13.060 (Homestead Statute)if the land is occupied as a primary residence. If the land is occupied as a primary residence, all instruments conveying or encumbering the land must be executed by each spouse, individually, or by an attomey- in-fact. In the event the Company receives instruments that are not joined by the non- owning spouse with possible homestead rights, the Company may be unable to record or to insure the transaction. Subdivision Guarantee Page 8 of 10 N·ote 1: Note 2: Note 3: Order No.: 10090460 The public records disclose that at the date of this Commitment there is located on the land: a 1-4 Family Residential structure known as: 13612 160th Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98059 13644 160th Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98059 13535 160th Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98059 The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WITHIN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT. LOT 1, BLK 3, CEDAR PARK FIVE-ACRE TRACTS; LOT 2, BLK 3, CEDAR PARK FIVE-ACRE TRACTS; PTN OF LOT 6 & ALL OF LOT 7, BLK 1, JANETTS RENTON BOULEVARD TRACTS WHEN SENDING DOCUMENTS FOR RECORDING, VIA U.S. MAIL OR SPECIAL COURIER SERVICE, PLEASE SEND TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS, UNLESS SPECIFIC ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE WITH YOUR TITLE UNIT: Commonwealth Land Title Company of Puget Sound 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98101 ATTN: Recording Dept. COMMONWEALTH PRE-ADDRESSED ENVELOPES MAY STILL BE USED WHEN SENDING DOCUMENTS VIA TDS (TITLE DELIVERY SERVICE) TO THE ADDRESS ON THE FACE OF THE COMMITMENT COVER PAGE OR TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company is a Pennsylvania corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of LandAmerica Financial Group, Inc., and is in no way affiliated or connected with Commonwealth Title Company of Pierce County, Washington. DWB/cgg Subdivision Guarantee Page 9 of 10 ~- EXHIBIT J. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: TRACT 1 IN BLOCK 3 OF CEDAR PARK FIVE ACRE I~' VOLUME 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 91, RECORDS OF KINE::" EXCEPT THE NORTH 100 FEET OF THE WEST 270 F:.- AND EXCEPT THE SOUTH 29 FEET OF THE NORTHE FEET OF THE WEST 270 FEET AS PER KING COUN'.;.:i ~.::-c RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9410250673; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WAS'::: PARCEL B: LOT 2 IN BLOCK 3 OF CEDAR PARK FIVE ACRE TRA,- VOLUME 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 91, RECORDS OF KING::I::: SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WAS?;: PARCEL C: ALL OF LOT 7 IN BLOCK 1, AND THAT PORTION LO,-- A LINE BEGINNING ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LO ··· .· THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; AND RUNNING WESTERLY TO A POINT ON THE WE--~k,, 4.8 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEF---- LINE AS SAID LINE WAS ESTABLISHED BY JUDGME=---'- KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 6911<; -··. BOULEVARD TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN lt - RECORDS OF KING COUNTY AUDITOR; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASC ;. consent, the been a Final of all appeals ·ed for habihty :hout the pnor ,eys• tees and '"· ~ofthe case pn,of " ,,. nitely fixed in nage snaa be -antee, an right ~da1mant dies which the claim had thlS hall transter to ;.ary in order to ,pany to sue, the Assured in e Assured the er the Assured I 12/15/95) Order No.: 10090460 12.. Arbitration. Unless prohil:rled by applicable law, ertner the Canpany or the Assured may demand arbitrabon pursuant to the Trtle lns...1rance Artrtratton Rules of the Arnencan Artirtr.lbon Asso:iation. Arbrtrabll!: matters may include, but are not lffited to, any contrnYersy or claim between the Company and the Assllred ansing out Of or relating to this Guarantee, any seMce of the Company in connection with i1s issuance or the bn!!ach d a Guaran~ provLSJon or othi:r obligation. All arbinble matt~ when th!!: Amount ot liability ,s S1 .OCXl,OOCI or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Assured AU artiitrable matters when the amount cf liabiity is in excess of S1,0XI.COO shal be arbitrated only when agreed tD by both the Company and the Assured. The Rules in effect at Date of Guarantee shall be binding upon the paft>es... The aw-an:I may in:lude attorneys' fees only if the laMi of the state in which the land is Jocatal pemuts a cnirt to award ~meys' lees to a pnwaillng party. Judgment upon the awatd rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered many court having JUnsdlCtlon thereof. The law ol the situs-of the land shaa apply to an artitration Wider the Title lnsuranoe Artiitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from tmt ~ny upon request 13. Liabillty Umlted m This Guarantee; Guararnea Entirw Contract. {a) This Guarantee together wit! aD endorsements, if any, attached heteto by the Company is the entire Guarantee t11nd contract bl!:Cween 1he Assured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this Guarantee, this Guarantee shall be construed as ii whole.· {b) My claim of 1as.s or damage, whettv,r 01 not based on negflgence. or any aebOn asserting such ctaim, $hall be rl!:Stricled to this Guaiantee. (c) No amendment of or endo~ent ID this Guarantee can be made except by ii writing endol$8d hereon or attached hereto $igned by either the President, a Vice President, the Se::retary, an Ass.!stant Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatl:lry of the Company_ 14. Notices. When1 Sent. All naices required to be given the Company and any stalement in writing required to be- fumished the Company shall indude the number of this Guarantee and shall be addressed to: Consumer Affairs Department. P.O. Box 27567, Richm:lnd, Virgtld.23261·7567 Page 2 of 2 · 1s NOT INTENDED TO SHOW ALL MAITERS RELATED \SEMENTS, ENCROACHMENTS OR LOCATIONS OF TOR POLICY TO WHICH IT IS A ITACHED. THE ·cH. REFERENCE SHOULD BE MADE TO AN IN RANGE: 05E SCALE I" -100' 4;:;----,------ S T, / -, ::.:..v1o-N Av•.\ /0- I I \ , .. • " .. .. li411•D6•"1W C.Z'-5Z(,"J . .. " ,o "' ~ ~., o. ... ., • ") ' .... ~ •• .. . ., V I I- d) "11 • .. " • • " • .. i,.: ~ V I ., I-.. 0 ... (C) .. ' ., .... (!r----• .... 0 .., .. ~-.... .... .s_ ... ~ i ~ ~))~i, A ! 'I - ' &. . ;l o• J ~ ~ <.ru,-,3.> '-s::""i~---,-;:-;.;:;;:;----=SQJl!!,<':;,/~:.._----_:_ ___ ~----J IJ06.73 S. E. I 3 6TH. ST. ,. ... --N 87-40-11 W SE 14 -23-5 This sketch is provided. without charge, for you~ in£Qrmaoon. It is not intended to show all matters related to the propertv including, but not limited to, area, dimensions, easemencs, en- croachmencs, or locaoon or boundaries. le is not a part of. nor docs te modify, the comm,cment or pohcv ro which it is atc1ched. The Company assumes NO LlAB!LlT( for any mamer relarcd co this sketch. References should be made to an accurate survey for further mformarion. 02106/03 li:42 FA.I 42564635li COlll!ONlVEALTR i4J 004 '' -;1' , : .. ~:IK~ ·, ' ·; -... ,I ! ' (/ 4 . -~:'. (o):i~ t l(1~··1~ . o'ljoJ~ ~ , Mrnl.nlsero~or/ ......... "~r'' -· t~ MAR o~ ··.;ra.rna s. Mu:rray. cea~cd / r '"~.u, ., .· K.C. D. .E.S. M IN FILE cop· ·sr-n1:: nr w.,~111....,;r.TO::'I., I , ,,:i•'l,l)j , , I r'•- (,~~~~r -~. r:, ··~Ci l . ··''-~_·.,..~:' .. , .;I.;.,. • ;' '~< {m t:';)f ,rt'~'c.~r~lly JjJf'ICJf,:,,J ],.-fr,•(" "It" :_.,, ,'.,', . . ··~1~ ...... , .:t.f;":~:i~;~:-~-rii bc'.~1;~ ~·lr1Jl~:,11:d1 · ~u.c-riht•,I in ,rul who nre111t<I th<' "'i1hlt1 :an,/ /,,,-.:,,~;;: in,-1ri.::,, .. ,,1.· ~111i Irn! .iruJ ,~.!;mi;,ry .Jct .,·i,J Jc~. r .. r 1~.r his~. s~uttJ..,. 02106/0.1 i;:~J F.-11 H5646J51i ,~"'t!ONWEALTH ----JAN~17-2003 12: 44 FRCM TrTLE SL:P S8VICES TO 4255453517 lN THE SUPERIOR COURT UF THI: STAT!: ( ll' \', ,\.'ii II 0.(; 1·( )., FOR KJNG COUNTY IRVINE A. ?v!ARLER ::ind S!IARON I::. · MARLER, husband and wife, v. :'.RAY11,10ND J. WEGLIN, for his .. sep!l!ate estat<:<; HOWARD R. WILSON a11d OLA J. WJLSON, Pl~intiffs ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . 1\, ,. [,ll ! J <l•l Jl 'IX;M1-:NT his wifo; LYLE B. DORSEY and CONNIE R. DORSEY, his wife', :rnd CARLE. PLATZ and JANE COE PLATZ, h!.s wife; ) ~kn clun c.s ) 1-C.C. D.D E" . . ... ) . This matter comil1g rcgul orly on for IJL•,11·i11/:'. l,d<1r,: ; I,,· t111clvr ·· signed, Judge af the nbove c111:itlr::cl CO,ll't up:m ,he Sripul:11 iull or ga lpli J;. P~i:ts, arrorney for the pl.:i.inciffa nbuvc· ntun..:d, 1111d Slid !;111. 1';1 i11, Sc,11:. ·R.ay __ mond]. Wi::glln, for Jii.s gq,ar,.tt'L' <·srmc-1.1ml (::id 1-:. 1·1;11!., :111 111n11:111,,·,' man and sciid coun!'lel ,1ppe;;iri11g pc>rscn1,1lly ll,:1'('1'.· 111-: .·,,1::·1 :11,,I :i,,· '°'"" · being fully advi.sed in the pn;:n1i,;,::-:, nmv tli.:·rd,,r,. LT IS ORDER ED,. ADJUlXi F:L) 1\NI) nl·:Cll I: I).) 11, 1: 11,. · i1s1t11,. :.1: -. line bctwef:n Tract 7, Block I uf '1-11)(.:,r.s 1,~'l'Jt()J 11, .. d,.-,·:11··.l i 1.1,.:,. ''"·' i, J 6, Block l or Jancw, Renton J,o,1lc:11c11·d Tr~c:1,;; Ii:.· ,·:.;!,1J1Ji:;l,,·d ;li:d riis ~-'''" ,,· fLlCCMENT--ragc 1 \ \, ' 141005 P. 02/133 / ., 02/06103 li:-1.1 FAI -1256-1635li JAN:_17-2003 12:44 FR\JM TITLE SiJFI rr:,rnoNWEALTH SER\JICES TO 425i,4S3517 .",::··· •,.· . . . : .' . . • :hi:ireby established .::.s follows: . ! ~ .. ::··'.··:. ~ . ,,,. ,•:• That portion· (lf Tr,a.:t 6, Hlci-·k I. "r ,!:1111:n.:-: Renton Bolllevnnl Tr:H:t~ l)•inic S1H1tl1 ,,r <1 1'! 1vi,·,· fence line us SUl"VCVt'.d and :;111 lW) I "11 I )I' :I I\' i llC . . No. 3158 of Enp;ini;:1.•.r ;111d T ~md Sttn·,•, ,,rs Freda.rick M. Druk'" am! Miles Dr,1,;.·. wilkl1 drawing is marked 1£xllibic "ll'' ..incl b)· :Iii" reference am1ched hereto and m,1c!c· ,, ;,:1 n hereof. More detnikd ciL·sc1'iptio11 i ,; ns follows: 111at portion of Tract 6, Hlock I. d ):111t'tts Renton Boulevard Trnc:ts :ls n.·conivd i11 \'n]un:,. 17 of Plats, rage 20_. rccnrds :if 1'i1:;: (:,·-1:1;1:·, Washington, lying S<1,1tlK·rly \1r :1 Jin, l,,·,:i1rni11,•: on the East line tif said Tract I:!. :l' f, ·vr :-., 1ni: of th~, Southeast ca:rner thcrc01' :111d n; 1: ni ;:,: Westerly to a poinc on the Wcsc Ji1k ,,r ,-;:1 i,I Tract 4. 8' North of the Soutl1e:1 sr c'Pn::..· ,-rll-,rv"f. and'thnt hcnccfori:11 saict bou11d:iry line sii:1JI dil'id,' iii,· t11·,, c,·:wrs :1,: :1h,·., de!ocribed. That neither party shall rccov(·r en~,;: , ,r :itt, 1rnv:· ,,-~-s :1~:1 i r,,,; the other. /l,q : (l Ii ,'.i.{ i'I! OONE IN OPEN COURT Tl·J1S ~ l.lA Y CF ,i,sjt:5:,/g_~~ ~ -,· ' J · or Defend::mts Haynwnd ]. Weg ' tor his separai:c ..:,:car~·, nnd ·earl E. Platz, an unrnarric.:d m,111 . •' l ,. I cl(, s: ii] 006 P. [f;>a3 "\ 1,,0 ::_,.,,,;,.-,.-.!1 :>!J ~;:,• .,-c -'"'-' ,'S',;.~i r/.-1,...~_ ,-' !)(~~1. Iii (i-,.w_:,,,,. ,/?. !"!crn= ,.,, ~·. (""!J t.,~~-,.- 60 D~C.R.IP"T'ION lho dsl ~~ ~..Jibt~ Ji:dl ~ ~,d ,/"Na ol"..klt f"/,;,V Ji!..SE,.,"(/'f.W14ri:Ja;1:~.::U ~/• .bid'.· ~,a',:,o:r./,,.~~..i-,t,ck-,Jllv,d ;JS~51ifiJ:1::'Jftlr'llt.;mff! :;;;,~. -ll;J(JZ. /J~JA!' 6n-v. N0:,"5',5().1'/ !S,ol J•1r.t',;,el{,Jf ii' tl:l"XIU!J~ 1/'ht.;:oimttl~ ' Allc:a.~ Ol!:'1!>~""rl;:.fu a'it.<iµ;,!,;,:f:.:.t. i;tJ 007 02/06/0J li:44 FAX 42564635li COMl!ON11'EALTH I_ ---LE -L I ----' lil oos •O :·:·,(.--;:..::·. ~. ··~ \' ,, ~ -------,., · ... ~ -----~i------ ']h:1•'1, ~:, ~i1z '!>-'l'J-h\ 11,1 ... 1 KT•I j•,.i,l i,,l!,m· ... ; 0•1 ~----- ,. ·1:~d. 1~' ~ '.~.i.;1ft: :1X1'.~\:-~t~'lo#;!~l;,;~!;~ii:-:~ . 'b~ ":t'.i~C l . 'irfJ ')irD · .. '.·:.: :·.:~·:?~_~t;·}.f~~~~.:·~~~-this. contract•: ·~-ijqs Z"!~~ TI11· r,11r1.l1,v(·r i~ <'111i:lnl In !.:ilu:-p,,~.._ .. ,.,n t1f ..... ;11 :1(1·:11kcs •lfl l:::.:ie.!i:1-; e "111,· 1•::r l,.,.,·r :1:.{r•:c., t11 p.r:y twi,.rr rldiuqu,rn..:=y :ill ta,:q •nd .l1i!.C!s.mc."tU lh.t m;11)" :1s btn,ei::n ~ntor •J1,T ~r.1;11n· 1,,-~, ,I :·1,-1 ;,..,, .. 11.--l 1i•."u •m :<..1i,I 11n:mi:sc<. : \,,. ;,,,, 11.1-n ;1-~ .... 1w, ,'' l•:i,.,r,! ... uf •J.1:11:11.c 111 ur 1lcstrueti.o11 of ~ny imprnvcmtnts l'IQW ,,u -aiU l:.nd or hen=• .,i1,,r 1,i I,,, pb.i·,1 !I • ._., •,,' • ! .( the 1al.ini: oi qiJ i•rcmi!IQ or ;my pen thcn:aC for-PJJOlic: me. ·nl•· 1•1tr,:h:1<d" :u.:r1:"1:'I. un1H Full p.:i.ynic1•t uf d,c =l,J p~rd\.ne pric:~; to kcq, :ill \lel.ndi"'!!:• on s-lc:I deterib.:.J 11r-('111i~-ir1,un•,l 1n rh'I: iull ;,._.ur:,hl,:-,-;;i]m· 1hcrcol :i..;:i,ins1; loS! or !br.-..:i.ge: Dy tire ir,. 5".lmc romp.any ::11:.c:i:pt.iblii! tu the -dkr ,,11.i f, .r rl•(" ,dkr'.1 1:-cJldic J~ im..-:-est m.Jy ;i.~;ir :i.rui ta ~y all prcmi!tms th~rcfor .:i.n.J ro di::lh·er :lll p,lli,;i,i:,. .111J r~·111""w:,i[, Llwrm~ rn the: ~dkr. In ,·:1,~· 1!1,• ptm·ha~r ,11.111 f:.il fn ru,1ke ~LIJ' p:i~·mc111 hr~t.,l~(on: pr,,1,·irktl by the ;mrdiucr tq b:: J11.J,dt:, the ,,,.,(!,.r r11.1y 111.d.,, .,•;.-!, 1~yment :,.n,I :in~· :im.,11n1 "(J p;ild hy ihe K"llcr, Cogt:thc-r with interc=.t t~crron from ~\C of ·•a_,,m,·::: ::rr1ll N'I"''" .;t t11e ~•c-~f lcn (1('1) percent pd :annum, ll!~U be rcp:iy;i.blc by the purch.i,cr or, 1t1'1'1.a1l(!', :ill : li"11' 1•n·j11,I;,-~ \<'> .,,1~· •)l.".,11r rii::!11 rh,: -c-lkr m.it,hL l"<;11·c hy tM.sor, of .,ud1 d, ~:..:.ift. Tl,. ;,:1:-,·i,., ,:r .iJ:r~c~ 1.i-;.it (n!I imp,.:,u,111 r,{ ..,,i,J d~":rit,,:d·prcmi~ ~s ~Cll m.:r.de .iruf t.h=i.t ncitlicr th<! i<lltr .,I·.,,,, I · ... ,·111 u,~,I,•"' !•,lr! "If,:,;~ <:ont:r::i~ •• ~ --- -· I_.:.;.-;~ ~i<'~'.~i! -r .; : ;,-, u.;. Ul), U.) l 1 :-t.1 .t-:LI. -L:!5f5·HiJ51 i COlll!ONWE.H TH ,nno ·4'1ti c '±duo ?AG, J I ... J -w l: -··< C . , 0 r· 2/ ;-, ... /j .., -.. " ;;; ~ " " C:: ·~:-?~~ ........... -·.,._,.~:.,_; <.\~ .. ~··. . • -·~i , . .. \ ,., -.~ .. -· '• ':': I I -;-' .: .. l,l t ~ '. 'l ;5 c::I I- v..• > I I I . ;/ £ ll( C 0~ I~ i:: ., ~ ,~ C ~ C3 ~ 'i "l -' f. 4J OO!J ..:,j ··:' <.::.."t:11 ... ~ ' '-''. • ... j SEE DRAWINGS) ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Sen-ices Dh·isiun 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton. WA 98055-1219 (206) 296-6600 TIY (206) 296-7217 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNlY OF KING ) File Number: ___________ _ Affidavit Concerning Sensitive Areas Compliance Alternative formats available upon request Application Name Liberty Grove Subdivision / Rezone ( 01-470} Project Location: --~~-~-~13=5=3=5_-~1~6=01 _• ~A~ve=·~S=E,.,___~~1~4_-=2=3_-~5 __ The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says: 1. 2. That the affiant is competent to be a witness herein; That the affiant is the applicant for the above project; [5) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~c ~ rrr, ln} MAR 1 'I 2003 UJ) K.C. D.D.E.S 3. That to the best of the affiant's knowledge the sensitive areas on the development proposal site have not been illegally altered; and 4. That the affiant has not previously been found to be in violation of sensitive areas regulations for any property in King County, or alternatively, that if there have been any violations, such violations have been/are being cured to the satisfaction of King County. Date and Place (City and St.ate) I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. MAIN FILE COPY 6 AFFIDAVIT CONCERNING SENSITIVE AREAS COMPLIANCE lc-aff-sacomp 11/02/01 Page 1 of 1 REVISED 09/03103 Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help King County and I or any other agencies with jurisdiction to identify impacts from a proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help King County decide whether an EIS is required. A. BACKGROUND FOR AGENCY USE ONLY ION 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Liberty Grove Subdivision L03P0006 Qpy 2. Name of proponent: Lakeridge Development, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of proponent and contact person: Proponent: Contact Person: 4. Date checklist prepared: February 28, 2003 Lakeridge Development, Inc. PO BOX.146 Renton, WA 98057 (425) 228-9750 Phone Mel Daley or Hans Korve DMP Engineering 726 Auburn Way North (253) 333-2200 Phone (253) 333-2206 Fax REVISED 09/03/03 5. Agency requesting checklist: King County, DOES 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Application Submittal ............................ March 2003 Public Hearing ........................................ December 2003 Council Action ........................................ February 2004 Engineering Submittal .......................... April 2004 Site Grading ........................................... May 2004 Final Plat ................................................. December 2004 I RECEIVi;: SEP O 3 2003 l'\mu L,i)\)i~ iY LAND USE SERVIC S Exhibit No --1.--...--1-.,,.... ... Item No. MAIN FILE COPY REVISED 09/03/03 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes please explain. No. 8. List any information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The following information will be prepared and submitted under separate cover or is available in County files: • Rezone application -DDES • Level 1 Downstream Analysis REVISED July 11. 2003 • Conceptual Drainage Plan • Traffic Study, DN Traffic Consultants, February 7, 2003 • Wetland Report -Habitat Technologies, November 5, 2002 • Preliminary Recreation Plan • Traffic Study. DN Traffic Consultants, REVISED July 24, 2003 • Drainage Adjustment Request, July 11, 2003 • School Walking Route Analysis, August 18, 2003 • Addendum Wetland Report, H&S Consulting, July 18. 2003 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by this proposal? • Applicant has submitted a rezone application with this subdivision application. • Evendell Preliminary Plat approval (L01TY401) • Liberty Grove Contiguous Preliminary Plat Approval 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. SEPA Threshold Determination Re-zone Approval Preliminary and Final Plat Approval Clearing and Grading Permits Building Permits King County King County King County King County King County 11. Give brief, complete description of the proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. SUBDIVISION The proposed preliminary plat will subdivide one parcels, totaling 4.84 acres located on tax parcel(s) 366450-0141 into 24 single-family lots, open space, and access tracts. Storm water facilities will be located on an adjacent property to the south known as "Liberty Grove Contiguous". This is also where the majority of the required recreational facilities will also be located. The project site is located on the west side of SE 160 ... Ave. SE This property currently has a single-family home and associated outbuilding. The out building is to be removed. 2 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY REVISED 09/03/03 This project was original designed as one development with Liberty Grove Contiguous. All Traffic, storm water and recreation requirements have been addressed as part of the larger project, but presented with each individual application. The associated re-zone application has been rejected by Staff and the applicant has submitted a TDR proposal to maintain the proposed density. Sewer service to the proposed project site will require extension of a 10" to 12" off-site sewer line from approximately 154'" Ave. SE to 162"" Ave. SE, within the existing SE 136'" Street right-of-way. Additional improvements m\¥ include a 10" sewer main in 162"" St. SE. and a 8" sewer main in 158'" & 160 Ave. SE .. REZONE This project and its contiguous neighbor include a proposed rezone from R-4 to R-6. This proposed rezone would be consistent with the current comprehensive plan designation. This proposal will also be consistent with the development patterns of the surrounding area. The plat of Evendell located west of the Liberty proposal is currently being rezones from R-4 to R-6 as well. Since the original application, Staff has withdrawn their support of the re-zone application. In response. the applicant has submitted documentation to utilize the Counties TDR program to attain the proposed lot density. No additional impacts will result form the use of the TDR program. 12. Location of the proposal. Provide a street address, if any, and section. township. and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if available. The subject proposal is situated on three parcels totaling 4.84 acres, located within the jurisdictional boundaries of unincorporated King County in the NE V. of Section 14 Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. The site is located on parcel(s) 366450-0141. Please refer to the Preliminary Plat map for the legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map. The existing home is located at 13535160'" Ave. SE. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the s~e (circle one):! flat I, jrollinal. hilly, steep slopes, mountainous. The project site is located on the west side of 160'" Ave SE, in unincorporated King County. The property is generally flat, with a slight slope to the south. A review of records indicates that the property may have been filled prior to 1985, with ditches installed around the east, west and south sides. The property is currently maintained as lawn and residential landscaping. There no streams or wetland features on this portion of the project. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? According to the field topographic survey, the steepest slope on the site is approximately 5% to 10% located northeast corner of the project site. 3 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY REVISED 09/03/03 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to the US Soil Conservation Service Soil Map, the site is primarily Alderwood series (AgC} d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. According to the King County Sensitive Areas Map, the property contains no hazard areas. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading of the site will be necessary to modify the site for stonnwater drainage now. The exact quantity of grading is not known at this time, however, it is anticipated that the grading activities would be designed to balance and not require import or export of soil. Grading of the individual home sites will involve the excavation of approximately 150 to 200 CY of cut and/or fill. These issues will be addressed during the building pennit phase. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some erosion could occur on-site as a result of construction activities; however, temporary erosion and sedimentation control measures to be approved by King County will be employed to reduce erosion impacts. All construction during the wet season will comply with the 1998 Surface Water Design Manual, Sections 5.4.8 and D.4.2.1A concerning site coverage techniques. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Due to the preliminary nature of the plans, the exact percentage of impervious surface associated with this project is currently unknown. The subject proposal will not exceed the maximum impervious surface area as required by KCC 21A.12.030 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During construction, the contractor will follow an approved temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan meeting KCC standards. Typical measures, which may be employed, include the use of silt fences, straw bales, and temporary stonn drainage features. Hydro seeding exposed soils and cleared areas after construction will also reduce the potential for erosion. All construction during the wet season will comply with the 1998 Surface Water Design Manual, Sections 5.4.8 and D.4.2.1A concerning site coverage techniques. 4 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY REVISED 09103/03 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Construction: Emissions and dust particulates generated primarily by construction equipment will be produced during the construction phase of this project. The amount of emissions to the air will be minimal and will occur during the actual construction of the development. Long Term Air Quality: Long-term air impacts would be those typically associated with residential land uses. Sources of long-term emissions and odor could include vehicle emissions from increased vehicle use generated by the new residential units and emissions from wood burning fireplaces (if permitted). The additional vehicular emissions in these areas are not anticipated to concentrate and therefore are not anticipated to create a health hazard to the residents or surrounding areas. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. Water If particulates become suspended during construction, frequent watering of the site during the construction phase of the project would be used to help control dust and other particulates generated on the site. This will be accomplished in accord with Section 5.4.7 of the 1998 Surface Water Design Manual. a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. According to the King County Sensitive Areas Folio, there are no recorded streams or other water bodies on the subject site. 2) Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 5 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY ~:,:' ':>:,x/::· ::;[-~.::.. ,._'neck::·,-'." REVISED 09/03103 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NA 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan According to the King County Sensitive Areas Maps, no portion of the site lies within the 100-foot flood plain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None known at this time. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. On-site stonn water runoff will primarily be generated from roadways, residential structures, and associated driveways. Storm water will be collected in catch basins within the roadways and/or tight-lined from residential roof tops and conveyed to a proposed detention facility located in the plat of Liberty Grove Contiguous, to the southeast. Storm water will be transferred along 160"' Ave. SE and processed in the single stonnwater facility located on parcel -0090. Discharge from the proposed facility will be piped into the existing storm water system in the area. Refer to the attached Level 1 stonn water report for complete details. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. 6 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY ,,_.,.,;) ,,:,~r: s;:::: -,,..., -l REVISED 09103/03 Some pollutants normally associated with residential development could enter the surface water; however, the amount would be minimal since the on-site drainage will be conveyed to a water quality and detention facility in conformance with the 1998 Surface Water Design Manual. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The storm water runoff will be collected and conveyed to a detention facility(s) that will be designed and constructed in conformance with the 1998 Surface Water Design Manual. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the s~e: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: evergreen tree: fir, cedar, hemlock, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Section A of the proposed subdivision, located on the west side of 160"' Ave. SE is dominated by well managed and maintained lawn and other ornamental landscaping associated with the existing residence. Some of the existing ornamental landscaping will be removed during the development process as will any remaining trees or shrubs. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are no known threatened or endangered plant species on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The proposed preliminary plat anticipates retaining existing trees when possible. The new single-family residences will provide new landscaping including lawns, shrubs, and ornamental trees. Native vegetation will be utilized, where appropriate. Some additional trees and vegetation may be incorporated into the recreation area and storm water facility where appropriate. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk. heron, eagle, songbirds, other: 7 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY REVISED 09/03/03 mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: rodents, raccoons. fish: bass, perch, salmon, trout, hening, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Installation of native landscaping throughout the plat area will provide coverage and habitat for urban tolerant wildlife. Typical landscaping is likely to include rhododendron, azalea, boxwood, magnolia, cedar, hemlock, blue spruce, cherry, plum, maple and ash. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical energy will be the primary source of power serving the needs of the project and natural gas will be made available for the purpose of heating and other needs associated with residential living. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The residential buildings that will be constructed as a result of this project will meet or exceed the applicable single-family residential energy conservation / consumption requirements in King County and the Uniform Building Codes. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. It is unlikely under normal working conditions that environmental health hazards would be encountered. All project-related construction will meet or exceed current, County, State and Federal laws. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 8 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY REVISED 09/03/03 In the event that environmental health hazards are encountered or occur during construction, all appropriate precautionary measures will be employed. Any emergency situation would be addressed by the existing resources of Fire District #25. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: State regulations regarding safety and the handling of hazardous materials will be followed during the construction process. Equipment refueling areas would be located in areas where a spill could be quickly contained and where the risk of hazardous materials entering surface water is minimized. On-site management will be equipped with mobile communications equipment at all times to contact emergency services in the event of an incident. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area, which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? The dominant source of noise in the project vicinity is traffic along 160'" Ave. SE, which bisects the proposed project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term impacts would result from the use of construction equipment during site development. Construction would occur during permitted construction hours and in compliance with King County noise standards. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction activity will be limited to permitted construction hours and construction equipment will not be allowed to idle for continuous periods of time, which will help to mitigate the impacts of potential construction noise. Hours of operation will be posted on-site. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site(s) are currently used as single family residences. One of the existing properties contains a barn and other outbuildings associated with the keeping of live stalk. Adjacent land uses consist of a low density single- family residence. The existing plat of Liberty Lane is located to the east and the proposed plat of Evendell is located to the west. b. Has the s~e been used for agriculture? If so, describe. It is not believed that the site was utilized for agricultural production in the past. c. Describe any structures on the site. 9 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY REVISED 09/03/03 The project site is divided into two portions. One portion is located on the west side of SE 160th Ave. SE , Section "A"(366450-0141}. This property currently has a single-family home and associated outbuilding. The outbuilding is to be removed as part of this proposal. • 3,270 SF home located at 13535 160TH AV SE 98055 (366450-0141 d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes. One of the homes and all of the out buildings are proposed for removal. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The project site is currently zoned R-4. The applicant has submitted a proposal to rezone the property as R-6 or utilize the Counties TDR program to achieve the desired lot count. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? According to the King County Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the area is designated Urban Residential -R 4-12. This designation would support the proposed rezone of the property. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. According to the 1990 King County Sensitive Areas Folio no part of the property has been designated as sensitive. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Assuming 2.5 persons per household, approximately 60 people would reside in the proposed project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 0 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: The proposed project will provide 23 new housing units, 24 total. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project will be developed in accordance with applicable King County development and land use codes to ensure the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and applicable development 10 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY REVISED 09/03/03 regulations in effect at the time of a complete Preliminary Subdivision application. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Approximately 23 (24 total) new middle-income housing units will be provided. b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Two middle income homes will be removed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Adherence to the comprehensive plan and growth management planning goals of King County would ensure that housing development is consistent with those policies stated in the applicable land use plan. 23 new homes will be built. 1 o. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? No specific building plans are included with this project; however, it is anticipated that houses built on the site would confonn to the King County development regulations and be limited to a height of 35 feet in accordance with 21A.12.030. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Development of the site -would result in a change to the visual character of the site for the nearest existing residences and roadways to that of a single- family neighborhood area. No significant views would be obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The site plan has been developed to provide a site design layout consistent with the development regulations in place for the R-4 and/or R-6 zone. The proposed project incorporates landscape and open space areas in accordance with King County development regulations. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light and glare from the completed project is anticipated to be that typically generated by single-family residences, mainly occurring during the evening hours, and be associated with vehicle headlights, streetlights and residential unit lighting. 11 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY REVISED 09/03/03 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. To the best of our knowledge, there are no landmarks or evidence of any significant historic, archaeological, scientific or cultural resources known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: If any such historic or cultural evidence is encountered during construction or installation of improvements, work would be halted in the area and a state-approved archaeologist/historian would be engaged to investigate, evaluate and/or move or curate such resources, as appropriate. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The proposed project will take primary access from 160'" Ave SE. Please refer to the attached Traffic Study for more details. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. The nearest transit stop is located near the comer of SE 128'" Street and 1 so'" Ave SE, approximately .46 miles away from the project site. The Metro bus rout providing service to that stop is #111. There is no bus shelter provided at that location. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None. The proposed project will provide parking in private driveways, garages and on-street parking. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Yes, the i:,roposed project will require improvement of public right-of-way along 160 Ave. SE & SE 136'" Street and construction of internal circulation roads and access tracts. All roads will be designed and constructed to current King County standards. 160'" Ave. SE will be designed to the Urban Collector standard. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 13 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY :.::f':___l --C,l·r'l·.' ::::f:::L,i ,-,.,,<, . .:,"- REVISED 09/03/03 Assuming 10 trips per household per day, the completed project will generate approximately 240 vehicular trips per day. Please refer to the attached Traffic Report for specific details. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The applicant or subsequent owner(s) will comply with Title 14 of the King County Code, which contains provisions for payment of MPS (Mitigation Payment System) Fees. Applicant will either pay the MPS fee at the time of final plat application or at the time of building permit application. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid will be the fee in effect at the time of plat application, and a note will be placed on the face of the plat stating, "All Mitigation Payment System Fees required by Title 14 have been paid." If the second option is chosen, the MPS fee paid will be the fee in effect at the time of building permit application. Contributions to projects listed in the MPS program may receive credit towards the MPS payment due. The estimated MPS fee for this project at the time of application will be, based on a 23 NEW (24 total) unit subdivision. The project lies within MPS zone # 452, which has a fee of $2,139 per new single-family unit. Based on 23 new units, the projected total MPS fee is $49,197. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The completed project would result in an increased need for police and fire protection as well as emergency medical service. Additional recreational and school facilities will also be required to address the increase in demand for recreational opportunities. Extension of public sewer and water service will also be required. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The project will be designed and constructed with adequate water pressure, properly located fire hydrants and roadways constructed to allow adequate access for fire, medic and police protection vehicles. Increased property valuation will result in increased taxes generated to support public services. Sewer service to the proposed project site will reguire extension of a 1 O" to 12" off-site sewer line from approximately 154th Ave. SE to 162"" Ave. SE. within the existing SE 136th Street right-of-way. Additional improvements malinclude a 10" sewer main in 162"" St. SE .• and a 8" sewer main in 158"' & 160" Ave. SE. The proponent will pay necessary school and traffic mitigation fees to offset the potential impacts to the school and transportation system. The project is located in the Issaquah School District #411. The current school impact fee is $3,924 per single-family unit. Assuming 23 new units (24 total), the total school impact fee would be $90,252. 14 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY REVISED 09/03/03 Recreational facilities will be constructed on site in accordance with the requirements of 21A.14 to offset the potential impacts on the existing recreational system or a fee-in-lieu of those facilities will be offered. 16. Utilities a. Indicate utilities currently available at the site: Electricity, Natural Gas, Water, Telephone, Sanitary Sewer, Septic System, Refuse Service, Other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Water System - Sanitary Sewer System - Storm Water - Electricity: Natural Gas: Telephone: Refuse Service; Cable TV: Water District #90 City of Renton -Extension of a 10"to 12" sewer main in SE 136"' St., 1 O" sewer main in 1 &Z"' St. SE., and a 8" sewer main in 158"' & 16<1" Ave. SE. King County Puget Sound Energy Puget Sound Energy Qwest Robanco AT&T Broadband All underground service will be constructed in conjunction with road and storm drainage construction activities C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Prepared: REVISED Hans A. Korve DMP., INC Planning Manager February 28, 2003 September 3, 2003 15 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY ' Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help King County and / or any other agencies with jurisdiction to identify impacts from a proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help King County decide whether an EIS is required. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Liberty Grove Subdivision 2. Name of proponent: Lakeridge Development, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of proponent and contact person: Proponent: Contact Person: 4. Date checklist prepared: February 28, 2003 Lakeridge Development, Inc. PO BOX.146 Renton, WA 98057 (425) 228-9750 Phone Mel Daley or Hans Korve DMP Engineering 726 Auburn Way North (253) 333-2200 Phone (253) 333-2206 Fax 5. Agency requesting checklist: King County, ODES 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable); FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Application Submittal ............................ March 2003 Public Hearing ........................................ May 2003 Council Action ........................................ June 2003 Engineering Submittal .......................... June 2003 [i5) [E t ~ ~ ~g [E fOr. lfl} MA 1 i 2003 J; Site Grading ........................................... July 2003 Final Plat ................................................. December 2003 K.C D.D.E.S. MAIN F LE COPY • 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes please explain. No. 8. List any information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The following infonnation will be prepared and submitted under separate cover or is available in County files: • Rezone application -ODES • Level 1 Downstream Analysis • Conceptual Drainage Plan • Traffic Study, ON Traffic Consultants, February 7, 2003 • Wetland Report -Habitat Technologies, November 5, 2002 • Preliminary Recreation Plan 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by this proposal? • Applicant has submitted a rezone application with this subdivision application. • Evendell Preliminary Plat approval (L01TY401) • Liberty Grove Contiguous Preliminary Plat Approval 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. SEPA Threshold Detennination Re-zone Approval Preliminary and Final Plat Approval Clearing and Grading Pennits Building Pennits King County King County King County King County King County 11. Give brief, complete description of the proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. SUBDIVISION The proposed preliminary plat will subdivide one parcels, totaling 4.84 acres located on tax parcel(s) 366450-0141 into 24 single-family lots, open space, and access tracts. Stonn water facilities will be located on an adjacent property to the south known as "Liberty Grove Contiguous". This is also where the majority of the required recreational facilities will also be located. The project site is located on the west side of SE 160"' Ave. SE This property currently has a single-family home and associated outbuilding. The out building is to be removed. This project was original designed as one development with Liberty Grove Contiguous. All Traffic, stonn water and recreation requirements have been addressed as part of the larger project, but presented with each individual application. The associated re-zone application is presented as a single application. Re-zone applications are based on parcels and not proximity. 2 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY REZONE This project and its contiguous neighbor include a proposed rezone from R-4 to R-6. This proposed rezone would be consistent with the current comprehensive plan designation. This proposal will also be consistent with the development patterns of the surrounding area. The plat of Evendell located west of the Liberty proposal is currently being rezones from R-4 to R-6 as well. 12. Location of the proposal. Provide a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if available. The subject proposal is situated on three parcels totaling 4.84 acres, located within the jurisdictional boundaries of unincorporated King County in the NE Y. of Section 14 Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. The site is located on parcel(s) 366450-0141. Please refer to the Preliminary Plat map for the legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map. The existing home is located at 13535 160th Ave. SE. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one):! flat L (ollinal, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous. The project site is located on the west side of 160th Ave SE, in unincorporated King County. The property is generally flat, with a slight slope to the south. A review of records indicates that the property may have been filled prior to 1985, with ditches installed around the east, west and south sides. The property is currently maintained as lawn and residential landscaping. There no streams or wetland features on this portion of the project. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? According to the field topographic survey, the steepest slope on the site is approximately 5% to 10% located northeast comer of the project site. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to the US Soil Conservation Service Soil Map, the site is primarily Alderwood series (AgCJ d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. According to the King County Sensitive Areas Map, the property contains no hazard areas. 3 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading of the site will be necessary to modify the site for stormwater drainage flow. The exact quantity of grading is not known at this time, however, it is anticipated that the grading activities would be designed to balance and not require import or export of soil. Grading of the individual home sites will involve the excavation of approximately 150 to 200 CY of cut and/or fill. These issues will be addressed during the building permit phase. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some erosion could occur on-site as a result of construction activities; however, temporary erosion and sedimentation control measures to be approved by King County will be employed to reduce erosion impacts. All construction during the wet season will comply with the 1998 Surface Water Design Manual, Sections 5.4.8 and D.4.2.1A concerning site coverage techniques. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Due to the preliminary nature of the plans, the exact percentage of impervious surface associated with this project is currently unknown. The subject proposal will not exceed the maximum impervious surface area as required by KCC 21A.12.030 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2. Air During construction, the contractor will follow an approved temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan meeting KCC standards. Typical measures, which may be employed, include the use of silt fences, straw bales, and temporary storm drainage features. Hydro seeding exposed soils and cleared areas after construction will also reduce the potential for erosion. All construction during the wet season will comply with the 1998 Surface Water Design Manual, Sections 5.4.8 and D.4.2.1A concerning site coverage techniques. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Construction: Emissions and dust particulates generated primarily by construction equipment will be produced during the construction phase of this project. The amount of emissions to the air will be minimal and will occur during the actual construction of the development. 4 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Long Tenn Air Quality: Long-tenn air impacts would be those typically associated with residential land uses. Sources of long-tenn emissions and odor could include vehicle emissions from increased vehicle use generated by the new residential units and emissions from wood burning fireplaces (if permitted). The additional vehicular emissions in these areas are not anticipated to concentrate and therefore are not anticipated to create a health hazard to the residents or surrounding areas. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. Water If particulates become suspended during construction, frequent watering of the site during the construction phase of the project would be used to help control dust and other particulates generated on the site. This will be accomplished in accord with Section 5.4.7 of the 1998 Surface Water Design Manual. a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. According to the King County Sensitive Areas Folio, there are no recorded streams or other water bodies on the subject site. 2) Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NA 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan 5 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY According to the King County Sensitive Areas Maps, no portion of the site lies within the 1 DO.foot flood plain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surtace waters? If so. describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description. purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable). or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None known at this time. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so. describe. On-site storm water runoff will primarily be generated from roadways, residential structures, and associated driveways. Storm water will be collected in catch basins within the roadways and/or tight-lined from residential roof tops and conveyed to a proposed detention facility located in the plat of Liberty Grove Contiguous, to the southeast. Storm water will be transferred along 1 &0u, Ave. SE and processed in the single stormwater facility located on parcel -0090. Discharge from the proposed facility will be piped into the existing storm water system in the area. Refer to the attached Level 1 storm water report for complete details. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surtace waters? If so, generally describe. Some pollutants normally associated with residential development could enter the surface water; however, the amount would be minimal since the on-site drainage will be conveyed to a water quality and detention facility in conformance with the 1998 Surface Water Design Manual. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surtace, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The storm water runoff will be collected and conveyed to a detention facility(s) that will be designed and constructed in conformance with the 1998 Surface Water Design Manual. 6 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help King County and I or any other agencies with jurisdiction to identify impacts from a proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help King County decide whether an EIS is required. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Liberty Grove Subdivision 2. Name of proponent: Lakeridge Development, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of proponent and contact person: Proponent: Contact Person: 4. Date checklist prepared: February 28, 2003 Lakeridge Development, Inc. PO BOX.146 Renton, WA 98057 (425) 228-9750 Phone Mel Daley or Hans Korve DMP Engineering 726 Auburn Way North (253) 333-2200 Phone (253) 333-2206 Fax 5. Agency requesting checklist: King County, DDES 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Application Submittal ............................ March 2003 Public Hearing ........................................ May 2003 Council Action ........................................ June 2003 Engineering Submittal .......................... June 2003 Site Grading ........................................... July 2003 Final Plat ................................................. December 2003 1 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY --, 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes please explain. No. 8. List any information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The following information will be prepared and submitted under separate cover or is available in County files: • Rezone application -DOES • Level 1 Downstream Analysis • Conceptual Drainage Plan • Traffic Study, DN Traffic Consultants, February 7, 2003 • Wetland Report -Habitat Technologies, November 5, 2002 • Preliminary Recreation Plan 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by this proposal? • Applicant has submitted a rezone application with this subdivision application. • Evendell Preliminary Plat approval (L01TY401) • Liberty Grove Contiguous Preliminary Plat Approval 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. SEPA Threshold Determination Re-zone Approval Preliminary and Final Plat Approval Clearing and Grading Permits Building Pennits King County King County King County King County King County 11. Give brief, complete description of the proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. SUBDIVISION The proposed preliminary plat will subdivide one parcels, totaling 4.84 acres located on tax parcel(s) 366450-0141 into 24 single-family lots, open space, and access tracts. Storm water facilities will be located on an adjacent property to the south known as "Liberty Grove Contiguous". This is also where the majority of the required recreational facilities will also be located. The project site is located on the west side of SE 160th Ave. SE This property currently has a single-family home and associated outbuilding. The out building is to be removed. This project was original designed as one development with Liberty Grove Contiguous. All Traffic, storm water and recreation requirements have been addressed as part of the larger project, but presented with each individual application. The associated re-zone application is presented as a single application. Re-zone applications are based on parcels and not proximity. 2 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY REZONE This project and its contiguous neighbor include a proposed rezone from R-4 to R-6. This proposed rezone would be consistent with the current comprehensive plan designation. This proposal will also be consistent with the development patterns of the surrounding area. The plat of Evendell located west of the Liberty proposal is currently being rezones from R-4 to R-6 as well. 12. Location of the proposal. Provide a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if available. The subject proposal is situated on three parcels totaling 4.84 acres, located within the jurisdictional boundaries of unincorporated King County in the NEY, of Section 14 Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. The site is located on parcel(s) 366450-0141. Please refer to the Preliminary Plat map for the legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map. The existing home is located at 13535 160"' Ave. SE. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one):! flat i. irollina). hilly, steep slopes, mountainous. The project site is located on the west side of 160"' Ave SE, in unincorporated King County. The property is generally flat, with a slight slope to the south. A review of records indicates that the property may have been filled prior to 1985, with ditches installed around the east, west and south sides. The property is currently maintained as lawn and residential landscaping. There no streams or wetland features on this portion of the project. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? According to the field topographic survey, the steepest slope on the site is approximately 5% to 10% located northeast comer of the project site. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to the US Soil Conservation Service Soil Map, the site is primarily Alderwood series (AgC) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. According to the King County Sensitive Areas Map, the property contains no hazard areas. 3 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading of the site will be necessary to modify the site for stormwater drainage flow. The exact quantity of grading is not known at this time, however, it is anticipated that the grading activities would be designed to balance and not require import or export of soil. Grading of the individual home sites will involve the excavation of approximately 150 to 200 CY of cut and/or fill. These issues will be addressed during the building permit phase. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some erosion could occur on-site as a result of construction activities; however, temporary erosion and sedimentation control measures to be approved by King County will be employed to reduce erosion impacts. All construction during the wet season will comply with the 1998 Surface Water Design Manual, Sections 5.4.8 and D.4.2.1A concerning site coverage techniques. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 2. Air Due to the preliminary nature of the plans, the exact percentage of impervious surface associated with this project is currently unknown. The subject proposal will not exceed the maximum impervious surface area as required by KCC 21A.12.030 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During construction, the contractor will follow an approved temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan meeting KCC standards. Typical measures, which may be employed, include the use of silt fences, straw bales, and temporary storm drainage features. Hydro seeding exposed soils and cleared areas after construction will also reduce the potential for erosion. All construction during the wet season will comply with the 1998 Surface Water Design Manual, Sections 5.4.8 and D.4.2.1A concerning site coverage techniques. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Construction: Emissions and dust particulates generated primarily by construction equipment will be produced during the construction phase of this project. The amount of emissions to the air will be minimal and will occur during the actual construction of the development. 4 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Long Tenn Air Quality: Long-term air impacts would be those typically associated with residential land uses. Sources of long-term emissions and odor could include vehicle emissions from increased vehicle use generated by the new residential units and emissions from wood burning fireplaces (if permitted). The additional vehicular emissions in these areas are not anticipated to concentrate and therefore are not anticipated to create a health hazard to the residents or surrounding areas. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. Water If particulates become suspended during construction, frequent watering of the site during the construction phase of the project would be used to help control dust and other particulates generated on the site. This will be accomplished in accord with Section 5.4. 7 of the 1998 Surface Water Design Manual. a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. According to the King County Sensitive Areas Folio, there are no recorded streams or other water bodies on the subject site. 2) Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NA 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan 5 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY ._ .. __ , According to the King County Sensitive Areas Maps, no portion of the site lies within the 1 DO-foot flood plain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None known at this time. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. On-site stonn water runoff will primarily be generated from roadways, residential structures, and associated driveways. Stonn water will be collected in catch basins within the roadways and/or tight-lined from · residential roof tops and conveyed to a proposed detention facility located in the plat of Liberty Grove Contiguous, to the southeast. Storm water will be transferred along 160"' Ave. SE and processed in the single stonnwater facility located on parcel -0090. Discharge from the proposed facility will be piped into the existing stonn water system in the area. Refer to the attached Level 1 storm water report for complete details. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Some pollutants normally associated with residential development could enter the surface water; however, the amount would be minimal since the on-site drainage will be conveyed to a water quality and detention facility in confonnance with the 1998 Surface Water Design Manual. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The stonn water runoff will be collected and conveyed to a detention facility(s) that will be designed and constructed in confonnance with the 1998 Surface Water Design Manual. 6 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: evergreen tree: fir, cedar, hemlock, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Section A of the proposed subdivision, located on the west side of 160"' Ave. SE is dominated by well managed and maintained lawn and other ornamental landscaping associated with the existing residence. Some of the existing ornamental landscaping will be removed during the development process as will any remaining trees or shrubs. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the stte. There are no known threatened or endangered plant species on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The proposed preliminary plat anticipates retaining existing trees when possible. The new single-family residences will provide new landscaping including lawns, shrubs, and ornamental trees. Native vegetation will be utilized, where appropriate. Some additional trees and vegetation may be incorporated into the recreation area and storm water facility where appropriate. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the stte or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: rodents. raccoons. fish: bass, perch, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Known. c. Is the stte part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 7 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY ··:; Installation of native landscaping throughout the plat area will provide coverage and habitat for urban tolerant wildlife. Typical landscaping is likely to include rhododendron, azalea, boxwood, magnolia, cedar, hemlock, blue spruce, cherry, plum, maple and ash. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical energy will be the primary source of power serving the needs of the project and natural gas will be made available for the purpose of heating and other needs associated with residential living. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The residential buildings that will be constructed as a result of this project will meet or exceed the applicable single-family residential energy conservation / consumption requirements in King County and the Uniform Building Codes. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. It is unlikely under normal working conditions that environmental health hazards would be encountered. All project-related construction will meet or exceed current, County, State and Federal laws. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. In the event that environmental health hazards are encountered or occur during construction, all appropriate precautionary measures will be employed. Any emergency situation would be addressed by the existing resources of Fire District #25. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: State regulations regarding safety and the handling of hazardous materials will be followed during the construction process. Equipment refueling areas would be located in areas where a spill could be quickly contained and where the risk of hazardous materials entering surface water is minimized. On-site management will be equipped with mobile communications equipment at all times to contact emergency services in the event of an incident. 8 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area, which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? The dominant source of noise in the project vicinity is traffic along 160"' Ave. SE, which bisects the proposed project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term impacts would result from the use of construction equipment during site development. Construction would occur during permitted construction hours and in compliance with King County noise standards. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction activity will be limited to permitted construction hours and construction equipment will not be allowed to idle for continuous periods of time, which will help to mitigate the impacts of potential construction noise. Hours of operation will be posted on-site. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site(s) are currently used as single family residences. One of the existing properties contains a barn and other outbuildings associated with the keeping of live stalk. Adjacent land uses consist of a low density single- family residence. The existing plat of Liberty Lane is located to the east and the proposed plat of Evendell is located to the west. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. It is not believed that the site was utilized for agricultural production in the past. c. Describe any structures on the site. The project site is divided into two portions. One portion is located on the west side of SE 160"' Ave. SE , Section "A"(366450-0141). This property currently has a single-family home and associated outbuilding. The outbuilding is to be removed as part of this proposal. • 3,270 SF home located at 13535 160TH AV SE 98055 (366450-0141 d. Will any structures be demolished? If so. what? Yes. One of the homes and all of the out buildings are proposed for removal. 9 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The project site is currently zoned R-4. The applicant has submitted a proposal to rezone the property as R-6. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? According to the King County Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the area is designated Urban Residential -R 4-12. This designation would support the proposed rezone of the property. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so. specify. According to the 1990 King County Sensitive Areas Folio no part of the property has been designated as sensitive. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Assuming 2.5 persons per household, approximately 60 people would reside in the proposed project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 0 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: The proposed project will provide 23 lll!Y!( housing units, 24 total. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans. if any: The project will be developed in accordance with applicable King County development and land use codes to ensure the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and applicable development regulations in effect at the time of a complete Preliminary Subdivision application. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Approximately 23 (24 total) lll!Y!( middle-income housing units will be provided. b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Two middle income homes will be removed. 10 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Adherence to the comprehensive plan and growth management planning goals of King County would ensure that housing development is consistent with those policies stated in the applicable land use plan. 23 new homes will be built. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? No specific building plans are included with this project; however, it is anticipated that houses built on the site would conform to the King County development regulations and be limited to a height of 35 feet in accordance with 21A.12.030. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Development of the site would result in a change to the visual character of the site for the nearest existing residences and roadways to that of a single- family neighborhood area. No significant views would be obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The site plan has been developed to provide a site design layout consistent with the development regulations in place for the R-4 and/or R-6 zone. The proposed project incorporates landscape and open space areas in accordance with King County development regulations. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light and glare from the completed project is anticipated to be that typically generated by single.family residences, mainly occurring during the evening hours, and be associated with vehicle headlights, streetlights and residential unit lighting. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not under nonmal circumstances. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Installation of front yard trees along the street frontages and landscaping in open space areas will help to alleviate some of the light and glare created by streetlights, headlights and residential unit lighting from the adjacent 11 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY properties. The proposal will only install those street lights approved by King County and Puget Sound Energy. Typical streetlights would consist of a 150-watt, flat lens luminaire located atop a 25' light standard. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are currently no public recreation facilities in the immediate vicinity of the site. Undeveloped King County park land lies approximately 2000' west of the site. Maplewood Park is about 1 mile southwest of the site. Maplewood Heights park is .4 miles southeast of the site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. The project would not displace any existing recreational uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The proposed project will provide a minimum of 390 square feet of open space/recreation area per single-family lot (8,970 SF) pursuant to 21A.14. The applicant proposes to construct recreational facilities on site or pay the appropriate fee-in-lieu of recreational facilities to offset any potential adverse impacts of the project. Many of the required recreational facilities for Liberty Grove will be combined with those proposed for the plat of Liberty Grove Contiguous, to allow for a larger, more centrally located recreational opportunity. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. To the best of our knowledge, there are no landmarks or evidence of any significant historic, archaeological, scientific or cultural resources known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: If any such historic or cultural evidence is encountered during construction or installation of improvements, work would be halted in the area and a state-approved archaeologist/historian would be engaged to investigate, evaluate and/or move or curate such resources, as appropriate. 12 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY -.>.-, 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The proposed project will take primary access from 160"' Ave SE. Please refer to the attached Traffic Study for more details. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. The nearest transit stop is located near the comer of SE 128"' Street and 160"' Ave SE, approximately .46 miles away from the project site. The Metro bus rout providing service to that stop is #111. There is no bus shelter provided at that location. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None. The proposed project will provide parking in private driveways, garages and on-street parking. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Yes, the proposed project will require improvement of public right-of-way along 160"' Ave. SE & SE 136"' Street and construction of internal circulation roads and access tracts. All roads will be designed and constructed to current King County standards. 160"' Ave. SE will be designed to the Urban Collector standard. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Assuming 10 trips per household per day, the completed project will generate approximately 240 vehicular trips per day. Please refer to the attached Traffic Report for specific details. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The applicant or subsequent owner(s) will comply with Title 14 of the King County Code, which contains provisions for payment of MPS (Mitigation Payment System) Fees. Applicant will either pay the MPS fee at the time of final plat application or at the time of building permit application. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid will be the fee in effect at the time of plat application, and a note will be placed on the face of the plat stating, "All Mitigation Payment System Fees required by Title 14 have been paid." 13 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY _.1-- If the second option is chosen, the MPS fee paid will be the fee in effect at the time of building permit application. Contributions to projects listed in the MPS program may receive credit towards the MPS payment due. The estimated MPS fee for this project at the time of application will be, based on a 23 NEW (24 total) unit subdivision. The project lies within MPS zone# 452, which has a fee of $2,139 per new single-family unit. Based on 23 new units, the projected total MPS fee is $49,197. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The completed project would result in an increased need for police and fire protection as well as emergency medical service. Additional recreational and school facilities will also be required to address the increase in demand for recreational opportunities. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The project will be designed and constructed with adequate water pressure, properly located fire hydrants and roadways constructed to allow adequate access for fire, medic and police protection vehicles. Increased property valuation will result in increased taxes generated to support public services. The proponent will pay necessary school and traffic mitigation fees to offset the potential impacts to the school and transportation system. The project is located in the Issaquah School District #411. The current school impact fee is $3,924 per single-family unit. Assuming 23 new units (24 total), the total school impact fee would be $90,252. Recreational facilities will be constructed on site in accordance with the requirements of 21A.14 to offset the potential impacts on the existing recreational system or a fee-in-lieu of those facilities will be offered. 16. Utilities a. Indicate utilities currently available at the site: Electricity, Natural Gas, Water, Telephone, Sanitary Sewer, Septic System, Refuse Service, Other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinijy which might be needed. Water System - Sanitary Sewer System - Storm Water - Electricity: Water District #90 City of Renton -Extension of a 12" sewer main in SE 136"' St, 10" sewer main in 162"" St SE., and a 8" sewer main in 158"' & 16rl' Ave. SE. King County Puget Sound Energy 14 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Natural Gas: Telephone: Puget Sound Energy Qwest Refuse Service: Robanco Cable TV: AT&T Broadband All underground service will be constructed in conjunction with road and stonn drainage construction activities C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Prepared: Han A. Korve DMP., INC Planning Manager February 28, 2003 15 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY DO NOT USE THIS SHEET FOR PROJECT ACTIONS Rezone Request from R-4 to R-6 Parcel(s) # 14570-0085, -0090 and 366450-0141 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emission to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? This proposal is to rezone 12.76 acres of R--4 land into R-6. The approved rezone would result in a minimal increase in the amount of water or air discharge from the project. The current comprehensive plan designation is for urban residential development at densities ranging from R--4 to R- 12. Achieved density is increasing from the current 4 units/acre to the proposed 4. 7 units/acre. This proposed rezone would be consistent with that designation. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: All development will be in accord with the adopted King County Development standards. Stormwater collection and discharge will be in accord with the 1998 Surface Water Design Manual. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposed rezone will have no new significant impact on the existing plant or animal populations. With or without the proposed rezone, the subject property will be developed to its highest and best use. All sensitive areas will maintain the same level of integrity with or without the approval of the proposed rezone. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life? All sensitive areas will be protected in accord with the provisions of 21A.24.320. All retained sensitive areas will be provided appropriate buffers. All storm water will be detained and treated in accord with the 16 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 1998 King County Surface water Design Manual and will not adversely effect the retained sensitive areas. Wetlands will only be altered in accord with KCC 21A.24.330. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Electrical energy will be the primary source of power serving the needs of the project and natural gas will be made available for the purpose of heating and other needs associated with residential living. Electricity can be generated from renewable power sources such as hydro power. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: The proposed residential buildings for this project will meet or exceed the applicable single-family residential energy conservation I consumption requirements in King County and the Uniform Building Codes. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Therefore, there will be no increased impact to sensitive areas as a result of this rezone application. The sensitive areas on site will be protected under the provisions of KCC 21A. regardless of zoning classification. Any modification to the existing sensitive areas will be in accord with 21A.24.330. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: All development will be in accord appropriate buffers and setbacks. provided if required. with 21A.24.320 and provided the Additional buffer planting may be 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? None The proposed rezone is consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None 17 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY . • 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposed development will have the effect of locally increased traffic and population which will increase the demand on existing services from the currently allowed 51 single-family residences to the proposed 60. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Neighborhood tax revenues, taken together with Traffic and School related mitigation fees, will provide funds to continue the municipal services offered to the existing neighborhood and surrounding area. Development of the Liberty Grove project will also require improving existing unimproved or marginally improved King County right-of-way adjacent to the subject property. Primary access to both segments of the subject property will come from 160'" Ave. SE. Secondary access to the eastern portion of the subject property will come from SE 136'" Street. Frontage improvements contemplated for this project include: • Construct half-street urban neighborhood collector road improvements along the project frontage on SE 136'" Street. The existing KC right-of-way along the northern frontage is 30'. • Construct half-street urban neighborhood collector road improvements along the project frontage on 160'" Ave. SE. The existing KC right-of-way along the east and west frontage is 30' on either side. Applicant proposes to participate in the construction of the nearby Evendell sewer lift station. Completion of this facility will allow access to approximately 37 acres of land currently serviced by on-site septic systems, some of which are currently failing. In addition, several hundred acres to the north will be able to connect via gravity sewer mains to the gravity portion of the sewer system to be constructed by the Subject Plat and the Plat of Evendell as part of the SE 136'" Street improvements. The proposed subdivision will also bring with it on-site recreational facilities which are currently unavailable to the immediate surrounding properties. 18 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY • 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. None The Zoning Map amendment requested is needed to attain the residential density goals prescribed for the area in question, as currently designated within the King County Comprehensive Plan Map. Urban residential R-4 to 12 The re-designation of the subject property from R-4 to R-6 on the Zoning map will enable the property in question and the surrounding properties to be built out more in keeping with their maximum potential on land that is well suited for this level of density. • The proposed rezone is consistent with the current Comprehensive plan. • The proposed rezone and subsequent development will be consistent with development in the vicinity. • The proposed rezone will have no additional unmitigated impact on the transportation system beyond what would be allowed under current density limits. • The proposed rezone will not have an adverse affect on the general health, safety or welfare of the citizens of King County 19 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY -® King County Road Services Division Department of Transportation ZOl South Jackson Street Seattle. WA 98104-3856 TYPE OF CERTIFICATE 181 ORIGINAL 0 CONDITIONAL • May 23, 2002 Certificate # 01405 File Number: 02--05-21--02 Exnires: Mav 23. 2003 CERTIFICATE OF TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY D Specific conditions are described on the reverse side of this certificate. Pursuant to King County Code, Chapter 14. 70 as amended, this certificate confirms that the level of service standard used in the Transportation Concurrency Management program has been satisfied and sufficient road capacity is reserved for the development project described below. IMPORTANT: This certificate does not guarantee a deveJopment permit. Other transportation improvements and mitigation will be required to comply with Intersection Standards, Mitigation Payment System, King County road standards, and/or safety needs. I. Applicant Name and Address: WM Wayne Jones, Jr., Lakeridge Development, Inc. PO Box 146, Renton, WA 98057 2. Property Location: a. Property Address: 13612160th Avenue SE b. Development Name: c. Parcel Number: 1457500085,90;3664500141 3. Type of Development Permit To Be Requested: Formal Plat 4. Proposed Land Use: Single Family Residential K.C. o.o.E.S 5. Zone Location and Reserved Units: a. Concurrency Zone: 763 Community Planning Area: Newcastle i. Commercial Project-Total Square Feet: 0 ii. Mult~family-NumberofUnits: 0 iii. Single family-Nnmber of Units: 60 6. This Certificate is subject to the following general conditions: a. This Certificate of Concurrency runs with the land and is transferable only to slibsequent owners of the same property for the stated development, subject to the terms, conditions and expiration date listed herein. This Certificate of Concurrency is not transferable to any other property and has no commercial value. This Certificate Expires: May 23, 2003 unless you apply for the development permit described above, prior to that date. If this requirement is not met the King County Department of Transportation reserves the option to cancel your certificate and capacity reservation. When you apply for a development permit with King County's Department of DeveJopment and EnvironmentaJ Services (DDES), bring this Certificate of Transportation Concurrency as part of the development application package. If you have any questions, please call (206) 263-4722. Linda Dougherty, Manager, Road Services DiVIs1on Department of Transportation King County, Washington ® FILE COP Subdivision Density and Dimension Calculations SEP O 3 2003 /\11~G COUNTY LAND USE SERVICES L03P0006 -{L03TY403} File Number (To be filled in by ODES) I PREUMINARY SUBDIVISION WORKSHEET RELATING TO DENSITY AND DIMENSIONS! Several development regulations play a role in the creation of a subdivision within King County. Determining the allowable density, minimum density, and a lot width on a piece of property can be confusing. This worksheet will assist you in correctly applying specific portions of the code and will be used to determine If a proposed subdivision or short subdivision meets the density and dimensions provisions of the King County Zoning Code (Title 21A). This worksheet is designed to assist applicants and does not replace compliance with adopted local, state and federal laws. Pre-application conferences are required prior to submittal of a subdivision or short subdivision. These conferences help to clarify issues and answer questions. They may save you both time and money by eliminating delays resulting from requests for additional Information and revisions. You may call (206) 296-6600 to find out how to arrange for a pre-application conference. Worksheet Prepared By: Hans Korye Date: 04/28/03 (Print Name) Subdivision Name: Liberty Grove Preliminary Plat (R-4 Option WI TDR) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Urban Residential R-4 to R-12 Zoning: R-4 * ----------* R-4 Option w/ TOR If more than one Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation or zone classification exists for the property, show the boundary between the land uses or zones and the area within each on the preliminary plat map. If a single lot is divided by a zone boundary, transferring density across zones on that lot may be permitted subject to the provisions of K.C.C. 21A.12.200. Please complete only the applicable portions of this form I. Site Area (K.C.c. ZlA,06.1172) also see (K,C.C. 21A.12,080): Site area (In square feet) is the gross horizontal area of the project site, u submerged lands as defined by K.C.C. 21A.06.1265, and u areas which are required to be dedicated on the perimeter of a project site for the public rights-of-way. + = _ _,O,....__ square feet In submerged land (any land below the ordinary high water mark -see K.C.C. 21A.06.825) --P--square feet In perimeter rights-of-way which will be required to be dedicated (area 30 feet from center line of road) _........_O __ Total * All existing MAIN FILE COPY I\. Density and Dimension Calculations Liberty Grove R·4 Option w/ TOR Page 1 of 6 /.(_ \;. Calculation: 210.830 Gross horizontal area of the project site 0 Total submerged lands and rights-of-way 210.830 Site area in square feet NOTE: To continue calculations, convert site area in square feet to acres by dividing by 43,560 4.84 Site area in acres NOTE: When calculating the site area for parcels in the RA Zone, if the site area should result in a fraction of an acre, the following shall apply: Fractions of .50 or above shall be rounded up to the next whole number and fractions below .50 shall be rounded down. Example: If the site area in acres is 19.5 acres (less the submerged land and less the area that is required to be dedicated on the perimeter of a project site for public right-of-way) the site area can be rounded up to 20 acres. No further rounding is allowed. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.080) II. Base 0ensitv <1<.c.c. 21A.12.030 -.o4o tables); Toe base density is determined by the zone designations(s) for the lot. R-4 du/acre * Not induding TOR III. Allowable Dwelling units and Rounding CK,c.c. 21A.12.0101; Toe base number of dwelling units is calculated by multiplying the' site area by the base density in dwelling units per acre (from K.C.C. 21A.12.030 -.040 tables). 4.84 site area In acres (see Section 1.) X ---'4l--base density (see Section II) = --'1""9'----allowable dwelling units Except as noted below, when calculations result In a fraction, the fraction is rounded to the nearest whole number as follows: A. Fractions of .50 or above shall be rounded up; and B. Fractions below .50 shall be rounded down. NOTE: For parcels in the RA Zone, no rounding is allowed when calculating the allowable number of dwelling units. For example, if the calculation of the number of dwelling units equaled 2.75, the result would be 2 dwelling units. Rounding up to 3 Is not allowed. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.070(E)). Iv. BeQujred on-site Recreation Space <1<.c.c. 21A.14,1so1; This section must be completed only if the proposal Is a residential development if more than four dwelling units In the UR and R zones, stand-alone townhouses in the NB zone on Density and Dimension caloulations Liberty Grove R·4 Option w/ TDR Page 2 of6 property designated Commercial Outside of Center if more than four units, or any mixed use development if more than four units. Recreation space must be computed by multiplying the recreation space requirement per unit type by the proposed number of such dwelling units (K.C.C. 21A.14.180). Note: King county has the discretion to accept a fee in lieu of all or a portion of the required recreation space per K.C.C. 21A.14.185. Apartments and town houses developed at a density greater than eight units per acre, and mixed use must provide recreational space as follows: 90 square feet X ___ proposed number of studio and one bedroom units _N"'A~--- 170 square feet X proposed number of two bedroom units + 170 square feet X proposed number of three or more bedroom units + Recreation space requirement = Residential subdivisions, townhouses and apartments developed at a density of eight units or less per acre must provide recreational space as follows: 390 square feet X _1~9 __ proposed number of units 390 square feet X ~2~4 __ proposed number of units, Including TOR Mobile home parks shall provide recreational space as follows: 260 square feet X ___ proposed number of units v. Net Bujldable Area (K.C.C. 21A.06.797l: = 7 410 = 9 360 = NA This section is used for computing minimum density and must be completed only if the site is located in the R-4 through R-48 zones and designated Urban by the King County comprehensive Plan. The net buildable area Is the site area (see Section I) less the following areas: ~o ___ areas l:YJthin a project site which are required to be dedicated for public rights-of-way in excess of sixty ( 60') of width + ~o ___ sensitive areas and their buffers, to the extent they are required by King County to remain undeveloped + o areas required for above ground stormwater control facilities including, but not limited to, ---retention/detention ponds, blofiitration swales and setbacks from such ponds and swales + 7,410 areas required by King County to be dedicated or reserved as on-site recreation areas. Deduct area within stormwater control facility if requesting recreation space credit as + allowed by K.C.C. 21A.14.180 (see Section IV) ___ regional utility corridors, and + ___ other areas, excluding setbacks, required by King County to remain undeveloped = 7,410 Total reductions calculation: 210,830 7,410 = 203,420 = 4.7 = 4.6 site area in square feet (see Section!) Total reductions Net bulldable area in square feet NOTE: convert site area is square feet to acres by dividing by 43,560 Net buildable area In acres Net buildable area in acres lndudlng TDR Density and Dimension Calrulations Uberty Grove R-4 Option W/ TDR Page 3 of 6 + + + + + + + = = = = VI. Minimum Urban Residential Density CK.c.c. 21A,12.Q6Ql: The minimum density requirement applies Qilly to the R-4 through R-48 zones. Minimum density Is determined by multiplying the base density In dwelling units per acre (see Section II) by the net buildable area of the site in acres (see Section V) and then multiplying the resulting product by the minimum density percentage from the K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table. The minimum density requirements may be phased or waived by King County In certain cases. (See K.C.C. ZlA.12.060.) Also, the minimum density requirement does not apply to properties zoned R-4 located within the rural town of Fall City. (See K.C.C. ZlA.12.030(8)12.) calculation: _,N..::..A'----base density in du/ac (see Section II) X Net buildable area in acres (see Section V) ____ X minimum density% set forth in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 or as adjusted in Section VII ____ minimum dwelling units required VII. Minimum Density Adjustments for Moderate s1ooes CK.c.c. 21A.12,os11: Residential developments In the R-4, R-6 and R-8 zones may modify the minimum density factor in K.C.C. ZlA.12.030 based on the weighted average slope of the net buildable area of the site (see Section V). To determine the weighted average slope, a topographic survey Is required to calculate the net bulldable area(s) within each of the following slope increments and then multiplying the number of square feet in each slope Increment by the median slope value of each slope increment as follows: _NA___ sq. ft 0·5% slope increment X 2.5% median slope value = NA ____ sq. ft 5-10% slope increment X 7.5% median slope value= + ____ sq. ft 10-15% slope Increment X 12.5% median slope value= ____ + ____ sq. ft 15-20% slope increment X 17.5% median slope value= + ___ sq. ft 20·25% slope increment X 22.5% median slope value = + ____ sq. ft 25-30% slope increment X 27.5% median slope value= + ---sq. ft 30-35% slope increment X 32.5% median slope value = + ---sq. ft 35-40% slope Increment X 37 .5% median slope value = + ---Total square feet Total square feet in net buildable area adjusted for slope calculation: total square feet adjusted for slope divided by total square feet in net buildable area ----NA ----weighted average slope of net bulldable area ----% (Note: multiply by 100 to convert to percent -round up to nearest whole percent) Use the table below to determine the minimum density factor. This density Is substituted for the minimum density factor in K.C.C. ZlA.12.030 table when calculating the minimum density as shown in Section VI of this worksheet. Weighted Average Slope of Net Minimum Density Factor Buildable Area(s) of Site: 0% --less than 5% 85% 5% --less than 15% 83%, less 1.5°/o each 1 % of averaae slooe in excess of 5% 15°/o --less than 40% 660/o, less 2.0% for each 1 % of averaae slooe in excess of 15°/o Density and Dimension Calculations Liberty Grove R-4 Option w/ TOR Page 4 of 6 EXAMPLE CALCULATION FOR MINIMUM DENSITY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MODERATE SLOPES: sq. ft 0-5% slope increment X 2.5% median slope value= + 10,000 sq. ft 5-10% slope increment X 7.5% median slope value= 750 + + 20,000 sq. ft 10-15% slope increment X 12.5% median slope value = 2,500 + + sq. ft 15-20% slope increment X 17.5% median slope value = + + sq. ft 20-25% slope increment X 22.5% median slope value = + + sq. ft 25-30% slope increment X 27.5% median slope value= + + sq. ft 30-35% slope increment X 32.5% median slope value = + + sq. ft. 35-40% slope increment X 37.5 % median slope value = + 30,000 Total square feet 3,250 Total square feet in net bulldable area adjusted for slope 3,250 Total square feet adjusted for slope divided by 30,000 Total square feet in net buildable area = .108333 Weighted average slope of net bulldable area = 11 % (Note: multiply by 100 to convert to percent -round up to nearest whole percent) Using the table above, an 11% weighted average slope of net buildable area falls within the 50/0 --less than 15% range which has a minimum density factor of 83%, less 1.5°/o for each 1% of average slope in excess of 5%. Since 11% Is 6% above 5%, multiply 6 times 1.5 which would equal 9%. Subtract 9% from 83% for an adjusted minimum density factor of 74°/o. This replaces the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table. VIII. Maximum Dwelling Units Allowed (K.C,C. 21A.12.030 · ,040); This section should be completed only if the proposal includes application of residential density Incentives (K.C.C. 21A.34) or transfer of density rights (K.C.C. 21A.37). Maximum density is calculated by adding the bonus or transfer units authorized to the base units calculated in Section III of this worksheet. The maximum density permitted through residential density incentives is 150 percent of the base density (see Section II) of the underlying zoning of the development or 200 percent of the base density for proposals with 100 percent affordable units. The maximum density permitted through transfer of density rights is 150 percent of the base density (see section II) of the underlying zoning of the development. NA base density in dwelling units per acre see (Section II) X 150% = maximum density --,--maximum density In dwelling units per acre X site area In acres = ____ _ maximum dwelling unitS allowed utilizing density incentives (K.C.C. 21A.34) NA base density In dwelllng units per acre (see Section II) X 200% = maximum density ___ maximum density in dwelling units per acre X site area in acres = _.,.,,----- maximum dwelllng units allowed utilizing density incentives with 100 percent affordabli: units (K.C.C. 21A.34) 4 base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section II) X 150% = 6 maximum density 6 maximum density in dwelling units per acre X 4.84 site area in acres = --=-29=----- maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density transfers (K.C.C. 21A.37) Calculation: + -=19=----base allowable dwelling units calculated in section III ____ bonus units authorized by K.C.C. 21A.34 + 5 transfer units authorized by K.C.C. 21A.37 24 total dwelling units (cannot exceed maximum calculated above) IX, Minimum Lot Area For Construction CK.C.C. 21A.12.1001: Except as provided for nonconformances in K.C.C. 21A.32: Density and Olmenslon Calculations Liberty Grove R·4 Option w/ TOR Page 5 016 x. • A. In the UR and R zones, no construction shall be permitted on a lot that contains an area of less than 2,500 square feet or that does not comply with the applicable minimum lot width, except for townhouse developments, zero- lot-line subdivisions, or lots created pHor to February 2, 1995, In a recorded subdivision or short subdivision which complied with applicable laws, and; B. In the A, F, or RA Zones: 1. Construction shall not be permitted on a lot containing less than 5,000 square feet; and 2. Construction shall be limited to one dwelling unit and residential accessory uses for lots containing greater than 5,000 square feet, but less than 12,500 square feet. (K.C.C. 21A.12.100) Lot Width CK.C.c. 21A.12.osocan: Lot widths shall be measured by scaling a circle of the appllcable diameter within the boundaries of the lot as shown below, provided than an access easement shall not be included within the circle. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.050) • • I • I • I • 30 Feet \ Lot Width Circle I I • I • -I • -I -• -I -• -I -I -I -I -I I -I -I -I -I -I _. Lot Width Measurement Density Md Dimension Calt11laijons Uberty Grove R:-4 Option w/ TOR Page 6 of 6 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (206) 296-6600 TIY (206) 296-7217 Subdivision Density and Dimension Calculations Alternative formats available upon request File Number (To be filled in by DDES) ! PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION WORKSHEET RELATING TO DENSITY AND DIMENSIONS! Several development regulations play a role in the creation of a subdivision within King County. Determining the allowable density, minimum density, and a lot width on a piece of property can be confusing. This worksheet will assist you in correctly applying specific portions of the code and will be used to determine if a proposed subdivision or short subdMsion meets the density and dimensions provisions of the King County Zoning Code (Title 21A). This worksheet is designed to assist applicants and does not replace compliance with adopted local, state and federal laws. Pre-application conferences are required prior to submittal of a subdivision or short subdivision. These conferences help to clarify issues and answer questions. They may save you both time and money by eliminating delays resulting from requests for additional information and revisions. You may call (206) 296-6600 to find out how to arrange for a pre-application conference. Worksheet Prepared By:, _ _,H...,a,,_,n,,_s ,.,,Ko=rv.,_,e"---___ Date:~ re rfJ le (Print Name) /J)J Lr; 00 It J "I§ [E f[J Subdivision Name: Liberty Grove Preliminary Plat MAR 1 1 2003 l1lJ Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Urban Residential R-4 tij"~:1fD E.s Zoning: R-6 * __________ * Proposed rezone from R-4 If more than one Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation or zone classification exists for the property, show the boundary between the land uses or zones and the area within each on the preliminary plat map. If a single lot is divided by a zone boundary, transferring density across zones on that lot may be permitted subject to the provisions of K.C.C. 21A.12.200. Please complete only the applicable portions of this form I. Site Area (K.C.C. 21A.06,1172} also see (K.C.C. 21A.12.080}: Site area (in square feet) is the gross horizontal area of the project site, § submerged lands as defined by K.C.C. 21A.06.1265, and § areas which are required to be dedicated on the perimeter of a project site for the public rights-of-way. + = -~O __ square feet in submerged land (any land below the ordinary high water mark -see K.C.C. 21A.06.825) _ _,,O'---square feet in perimeter rights-of-way which will be required to be dedicated ( area 30 feet from center line of road) -~o __ Total * All existing NIA.IN FILE C OP'fi Density and Dimension Calculatlons Liberty Grove 11/30/01 Page 1 of6 U>3Poot>" calculation: 210,830 Gross horizontal area of the project site 0 Total submerged lands and rights-of-way 210,830 Site area in square feet NOTE: To continue calculations, convert site area in square feet to acres by dividing by 43,560 4.84 Site area in acres NOTE: When calculating the site area for parcels in the RA Zone, if the site area should result in a fraction of an acre, the following shall apply: Fractions of .50 or above shall be rounded up to the next whole number and fractions below .SO shall be rounded down. Example: If the site area in acres is 19.5 acres (less the submerged land and less the area that is required to be dedicated on the perimeter of a project site for public right-of-way) the site area can be rounded up to 20 acres. No further rounding is allowed. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.080) 11. Base Density CK.C.c. 21A.12.030 -.040 tables): The base density is determined by the zone designations(s) for the lot. R-6 du/acre * Assuming rezone from R-4 to R-6 III. Allowable Dwelling Units and Roundjng (K.C.C, 21A,12.070l: The base number of dwelling units is calculated by multiplying the site area by the base density in dwelling units per acre (from K.C.C. 21A.12.030 -.040 tables). 4.84 site area in acres (see Section 1.) x _----"'6-base density (see Section II) = _ __..2.,,_9 __ allowable dwelling units Except as noted below, when calculations result in a fraction, the fraction is rounded to the nearest whole number as follows: A. Fractions of .50 or above shall be rounded up; and B. Fractions below .SO shall be rounded down. NOTE: For parcels in the RA Zone, no rounding is allowed when calculating the allowable number of dwelling units. For example, if the calculation of the number of dwelling units equaled 2.75, the result would be 2 dwelling units. Rounding up to 3 is not allowed. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.070(E)). IV. Required On-site Recreation Space CK.C.C. 21A.14.180): This section must be completed only if the proposal is a residential development if more than four dwelling units in the UR and R zones, stand-alone townhouses in the NB zone on Subdivision Density and DimenSion Calculations Liberty Grove 11/30/01 Page 2 of 6 property designated Commercial Outside of Center if more than four units, or any mixed use development if more than four units. Recreation space must be computed by multiplying the recreation space requirement per unit type by the proposed number of such dwelling units (K.C.C. 21A.14.180). Note: King County has the discretion to accept a fee in lieu of all or a portion of the required recreation space per K.C.C. 21A.14.185. Apartments and town houses developed at a density greater than eight units per acre, and mixed use must provide recreational space as follows: 90 square feet X ___ proposed number of studio and one bedroom units _Nc:.:A_,___ __ _ 170 square feet X proposed number of two bedroom units + 170 square feet X proposed number of three or more bedroom units + Recreation space requirement = Residential subdivisions, townhouses and apartments developed at a density of eight units or less per acre must provide recreational space as follows: 390 square feet X -'2=c4c___ proposed number of units = 9,360 Mobile home parks shall provide recreational space as follows: 260 square feet X ___ proposed number of units = v. Net Buildable Area CK.C.c. 21A.06.797l: This section is used for computing minimum density and must be completed only if the site is located in the R-4 through R-48 zones and designated Urban by the King County Comprehensive Plan. The net buildable area is the site area (see Section I) less the following areas: _oc...___ areas ~ a project site which are required to be dedicated for public rights-of-way in excess of sixty (60') of width + _o=------sensitive areas and their buffers, to the extent they are required by King County to remain undeveloped + _O"-------areas required for above ground stormwater control facilities including, but not limited to, + 9,360 retention/detention ponds, biofiltration swales and setbacks from such ponds and swales areas required by King County to be dedicated or reserved as on-site recreation areas. Deduct area within stormwater control facility if requesting recreation space credit as + ---- allowed by K.C.C. 21A.14.180 (see Section IV) regional utility corridors, and + ____ other areas, excluding setbacks, required by King County to remain undeveloped = 9,360 calculation: Total reductions 210.830 site area in square feet (see Section!) 9,360 Total reductions = 201,470 Net buildable area in square feet NOTE: convert site area is square feet to acres by dividing by 43,560 = 4.6 Net buildable area in acres Subdivision Density and Dimension calculations Liberty Grove 11/30/01 Page 3 of 6 + + + + + + + = = VI. Minimum Urban Residential Density (K.C.C. 21A.12,060l: The minimum density requirement applies only to the R-4 through R-48 zones. Minimum density is determined by multiplying the base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section II) by the net buildable area of the site in acres (see Section V) and then multiplying the resulting product by the minimum density percentage from the K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table. The minimum density requirements may be phased or waived by King County in certain cases. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.060.) Also, the minimum density requirement does not apply to properties zoned R-4 located within the rural town of Fall City. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.030(B)12.) calculation: ~6 ___ base density in du/ac (see Section II) X 4.6 Net buildable area in acres (see section V) = 85% X minimum density% set forth in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 or as adjusted in Section VII = 23 minimum dwelling units required VII, Minimum Density Adjustments for Moderate Slopes (K.C.C. 21A.12.087l: Residential developments in the R-4, R-6 and R-8 zones may modify the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 based on the weighted average slope of the net buildable area of the site (see Section V). To determine the weighted average slope, a topographic survey is required to calculate the net buildable area(s) within each of the following slope increments and then multiplying the number of square feet in each slope increment by the median slope value of each slope increment as follows: ____ sq, ft 0-5% slope increment X 2.5% median slope value = NA ____ sq. ft 5-10% slope increment X 7.5% median slope value= + ____ sq. ft 10-15% slope increment X 12.5% median slope value= _____ + ____ sq. ft 15-20% slope increment X 17.5% median slope value= + ____ sq. ft 20-25% slope increment X 22.5% median slope value = + ____ sq. ft 25-30% slope increment X 27.5% median slope value = + sq. ft 30-35% slope increment X 32.5% median slope value = + ---- sq. ft 35-40% slope increment X 37 .5% median slope value = + ---- ----Total square feet Total square feet in net buildable area adjusted for slope calculation: -'NA"'-'---total square feet adjusted for slope divided by total square feet in net buildable area ____ weighted average slope of net buildable area ____ % (Note: multiply by 100 to convert to percent -round up to nearest whole percent) Use the table below to determine the minimum density factor. This density is substituted for the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table when calculating the minimum density as shown in Section VI of this worksheet. Weighted Average Slope of Net Minimum Density Factor Buildable Area(s) of Site: 0% --less than So/o 85% 5% --less than 150/o 83%, less 1.5% each 1% of averaae slonP in excess of 5% 1S% --less than 40°/o 66%, less 2.0% for each 1 % of averaae slooe in excess of 15°/o Subdivision Density and Dimension calculations Liberty Grove 11/30/01 Page 4 of 6 EXAMPLE CALCULATION FOR MINIMUM DENSITY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MODERATE SLOPES: sq. ft 0-5% slope increment X 2.5% median slope value = + 10,000 sq. ft 5-10% slope increment X 7.5% median slope value= 750 + + 20,000 sq. ft 10-15% slope increment X 12.5% median slope value= 2,500 + + sq. ft 15-20% slope increment X 17.5% median slope value= + + sq. ft 20-25% slope increment X 22.5% median slope value = + + sq. ft 25-30% slope increment X 27.5% median slope value= + + sq. ft 30-35% slope increment X 32.5% median slope value = + + sq. ft. 35-40% slope increment X 37 .5 % median slope value = + 30,000 Total square feet 3,250 Total square feet in net buildable area adjusted for slope 3,250 Total square feet adjusted for slope divided by 30,000 Total square feet in net buildable area = .108333 Weighted average slope of net buildable area = 11 % (Note: multiply by 100 to convert to percent -round up to nearest whole percent) Using the table above, an 11°10 weighted average slope of net buildable area falls within the 5% --less than 15% range which has a minimum density factor of 83%, less 1.5°/o for each 1°10 of average slope in excess of So/o. Since 11°/o is 6°/o above 5°/o, multiply 6 times 1.5 which would equal 9%. Subtract 9% from 83% for an adjusted minimum density factor of 74°/o. This replaces the minimum density factor in K.C.C. 21A.12.030 table. VIII. Maximum Dwelling Units Allowed CK.C.C. 21A.12.030 -.040): This section should be completed only if the proposal includes application of residential density incentives (K.C.C. 21A.34) or transfer of density rights (K.C.C. 21A.37). Maximum density is calculated by adding the bonus or transfer units authorized to the base units calculated in Section III of this worksheet. The maximum density permitted through residential density incentives is 150 percent of the base density (see Section II) of the underlying zoning of the development or 200 percent of the base density for proposals with 100 percent affordable units. The maximum density permitted through transfer of density rights is 150 percent of the base density (see Section II) of the underlying zoning of the development. NA base density in dwelling units per acre see (Section II) X 150% = maximum density ---,---maximum density in dwelling units per acre X site area in acres = maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density incentives (K.C.C. 21A.34) base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section II) X 200% = maximum density ----maximum density in dwelling units per acre X site area in acres = ----maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density incentives with 100 percent affordable units (K.C.C. 21A.34) base density in dwelling units per acre (see Section II) X 150% = maximum density ----maximum density in dwelling units per acre X site area in acres = ----maximum dwelling units allowed utilizing density transfers (K.C.C. 21A.37) Calculation: + + NA base allowable dwelling units calculated in Section III ----bonus units authorized by K.C.C. 21A.34 --------transfer units authorized by K.C.C. 21A.37 ____ total dwelling units (cannot exceed maximum calculated above) IX. Minimum Lot Area For Construction CK.C.C. 21A.12.100l: Except as provided for nonconformances in K.C.C. 21A.32: Subdivision Density and Dimension ca1culations Liberty Grove 11/30/01 Page 5 of6 x. A. In the UR and R zones, no construction shall be permitted on a lot that contains an area of less than 2,500 square feet or that does not comply with the applicable minimum lot width, except for townhouse developments, zero- lot-line subdivisions, or lots created prior to February 2, 1995, in a recorded subdivision or short subdivision which complied with applicable laws, and; B. In the A, F, or RA Zones: 1. Construction shall not be permitted on a lot containing less than 5,000 square feet; and 2. Construction shall be limited to one dwelling unit and residential accessory uses for lots containing greater than 5,000 square feet, but less than 12,500 square feet. (K.C.C. 21A.12.100) Lot Width (K.C.C. 21A.12,0SO(Bll: Lot widths shall be measured by scaling a circle of the applicable diameter within the boundaries of the lot as shown below, provided than an access easement shall not be included within the circle. (See K.C.C. 21A.12.050). I • I • I I I I I • 30 Feet '\ Lot Width Orde • • l-, ·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-· ·-·-·-·-·-·- Lot Width Measurement SUbdivision Density and Dimension catculations Liberty Grove 11/30/01 Page 6 of 6 • King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (206) 296-6600 TTY (206) 296-7217 Authorization for Waiver/Adjustment of Land Use Application Fees Alternative formats available upon request King County Code 27 .02.040 gives the Director discretion to waive all or a portion of the development review fees administered by the Department of Development and Environmental Services pursuant to Title 27 of the King County Code, provided the waiver is warranted in the Director's judgment or building permit fees are assessed to replace, repair, abate or demolish a structure due to property damage caused by natural disaster. Requests for waiver of adjustment of Land Use fees should be directed to: Manager, Land Use Services Division Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 and include a description of fees the waiver is requested from and a detailed explanation or justification to support the waiver request. TO BE Fl LED OUT BY APPLICANT / Name: Aile ID .,-L)i; t;'t...OPt-1-Sl'<T /N '-- Address: Po 130 'f-f t./t, ------'="--'--'---=--------- \1J,,,. Phone: 1./15 :Z 2 8 9 7.SO Statement ofJustification: 98DS'7 p I? G L WI. '-/.t T Permit Application Type: L 03 Pooo to Sierra Activity# (if known) Description of fees waiver is requested for: · This project and the project across the street (L03P0005) while not literally meeting the County's definition of "contiguous" should be reviewed as one project. They share storm drainage detention and offsite improvements, off site sewer improvements, off site road improvements, and shared open space. The wetlands, drainage and traffic studies were prepared as if they were one plat. The Hearing Examiner in a previous project ruled that multiple --i projects by one developer in the same area must be considered as one in regards to cumulative impacts. These projects should be reviewed as one by the same planning staff. We realize that the fees for L03P0005 are a deposit only and that we will be responsible for staff time above that covered by the deposit.. Date: A PR.1 L 1. 'j ). oo 3 Signature: TO BE COMPLETED BY LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION Staff Recommendation: .s. rvices Division T)jFALAP LICATION FEES: -· .$u\,jc:.e 5 pk/&/:) WAIVER AMOUNT: __ }±~() AMOUNT DUE WITH WAIVER: __ _ This completed and signed form must be submitted with the permit application or when making payment to ensure that proper credit is made to your account. -.,tr;,fc • (2/' /sfl,totJM bu£, Af :.J,v /4-,'C -/ / /tl Authorization for Waive Adjustment of Land Use Application Fees lc-aul-waifees O!j(,t!JMII FILE COP)'age 1 of 2 ~ I ,. May 6, 2003 Recommendation Regarding Fee Waivers & Transfer of Charges I spoke with Wayne Jones today to confirm our understanding of the waiver request(s). I clarified our understanding for counter service fees to be waived for processing of Liberty Grove Files L03TYOO_ & L03P0006. Additionally I confirmed our intent to bill totally to one file -File L03P0005, but that some spill over charges will likely occur on the other application numbers. This plat is across the street from Liberty Grove Contiguous Files L03TY 401 & L03P0005 -applications for rezone and plat. The applicant has applied for both sites. DDES has required two separate rezone and plat applications for the two separate sites. The applicant was previously informed that they could request fee waivers from one of the two sites since there will be some duplication in processing and obtaining information for each site and to allow for billing under one file. I would recommend allowing charges for processing Liberty Grove be charged under the plat of Liberty Grove Contiguous to assure a complete billing for the two sites is issued at one time. I would also recommend that should Liberty Grove Contiguous be approved through preliminary approval before Liberty Grove, then billing for Liberty Grove would revert back for billing under the Liberty Grove file numbers. L03TY40 -Amount Due at Intake-0 Counter Service Fee Waiver -$460 L03P0006 -Amount Due at Intake -0 Counter Service Fee Waiver -$460 Other Charges for L03TY40_ & L03P0006 transferred to L03P0005 Karen Scharer, PPM II SEE DRAWINGS) , • ;2601 ~ )30 ?)00()37 LIBERTI GROVE A PORTION OF SW 1/4, NE 1/4, Sec. 14, Twp. 23 N., Rge. 5 E., W.M. Being a replat of lot 2 and a portion of lot 1, CEDAR PARK FIVE ACRE TRACTS, Vol. 15/91 King County, Washington \ I cvARD WAC~$ . _,~· l ;ANE'.,., RENvT5'.'.' ;'.;'j'.;o &, .:50.01' 89,99' \ 90,60' 92.51' ~Ol_:~6j 9"E 116.62' ~7~0 ~,8 "' . ~$ 95.o~A ~ ~ r li:~o 1 (l)'t .; ; N)9'05. 5fW/ -,7~ 6 . s"E. 1000 ~ 10.s.sg· I-· l/11 I '° 't"' ~..,~-~!:4~"!(.i.<q.~ 11 If, ~ b "' " <O ij!\~ ~ ., ~" !I!; "'"' ~~ Naa·3s2.4•w S4.2B' 'e I". elj :§ 1,- % N88"3:!>'24~W ' 103,63' • / /JOINT US£ ~\~,'"1 • to' PRIVA."ft: l)~Alt..lJ..OC::-{ <"""ENT. s<E PRIVATE • r,'i U,50,j(Nf NO"Tt J r-..J & "" \.~ 1\<IS Sl\t<T 8'3i 11, q ~1 ~o<> 14 . ~ 6 J 5ft ~-~o. .,.,1.63' \<!) see·,,·,.~\. 125,60' \ N8B'3.3'24"W 74.M' " 2 ) 10' N41"590, / 20.oo- Hss·_:s_3~i4"w 82.00' ~ • e;: ,..., HJ') ~~II)~ : . s 8 t;~;~ 8 i l ~ g ( -~ ~ g i!i!il~ g ! 1N \QI, ?:. t N'Q6'.~3'24 •w 94.64' Ct:,1qi. 2 ·2 g, 1-[ • I \L!l.._ r"~ -·~·· OM~·· spo·i 11\ACT"'B' l:,,., N.138".U'24"W ·io -t-/ N88'33'24"W i.w; .. a5• NS7'55"20~W 116.521 ~~ l Re:r:t~~:C£ l~ 8 1 2.0o;,,_ ~ ; i 96.53' -i:,... 6=36 '05'15 .. 1..=-32.12' ,!'1" r Sl1£ET 1 I f'l ir, ~ / /"' • ,... ~ J-10' PRIVATE bRAIN,lt.G£ «I & '~\ \6 "': 4 ~ w wo1 u,SE1,1W1,~ "'ii: ~7"D~ 8\ t:z: ~ Ml( :t ~ ~g! ~,:a , .. ;;.i "f' ~ z j .., uii'~rm Pl'<IW,TC-· 1 ~-. -~ . j \ I.a b.-92'"26'1ft w ~1.,,,.1': R E .. se:uon· \--\ . W;~]~1Jr~i ,i.. 5 5 I i R-25.00'. ~ SEE Y.QTL H SK(.E1 I Of .3 ' lio' I / i:r, Z z .,., · l_.;,,.40,35 ID! 83.46' \ 74,86.' I r-----.-,~a2:.01• , 25-.00: ~~2,>-..,'~7~2,~~~·~·----i-/' .,\ ~\ Q DEDICAnD T07l"lt PUBUC --~f'L. L-,~·-·-· ·=t-·" Q .,. UPON 'ME Rt.COftDlNG OF THIS Pl.AT ~!..l:l r . Vt-N -.,,-+---,,--!i' AA\<J~lt--DRMN~~MENT,. m-,=;-s~ .. i~ F1d\f,\1£" 1,1 £™wt,·.·:::::<~.;-· , .. « r $Cf. f>RIVAl't (..sE'.MfNT 0 WOn: ,4 '.· . ., ·_. ,. · '._;, ~ SE£ -PRIVolri tM~.,NQ,"1:£: ~~'{-~~'/;!'~· !('; :-t.:,· ._,, . ' I - \ "'. -~ ~ "' <O 1n " :;; ~t_ DEOICA Th:D TO T'r\£ P\JBUC UPON i:t-1( RECOR~G Of" "!l-llS ptj,. f l ~ THIS SHEEl 8EU)W .:.· .·, · ·-· . THIS.s¢tr.BEL0W", :'·, 1----60,00'_--..:-l:') , 1SO_.O_O' 60.00' , .At n~~=- .. . . f ~111 60.00' 'ff41 "j . . "' ~ 8 ~ - 1I Ng 19 !"gi (Q1tf(/ ~ -w14 t\i ll ~i::· -r.~;5 ~u·· 1/\ • ::;he.· ---. · --~ ·.:tiJ&:if vs ·2~;., '"•'t ~ ;\,< \\t /11 60.QO', t\· '( ~ : ~ 12 f'I g g- "' ''60.9C·; __ .. '2 ,\ J '· g1 i ··t:~ .. :••: ~,,s-,, ·4.~:-" .;.:, ' -:::·; ~-· . -i;:-:-, . ',r(#'i\i<i. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS for PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LIBERTY GROVE February 7, 2003 Prepared By: Gary A Norris, P.E. DN Traffic Consultants PO Box 547 Preston, Washington 98050-0547 Client: Wayne Jones Lakeridge Development Company PO Box 146 Renton, Washington 98057 Exhibit No . ..i..\ ....l'(L.---~- ltem No. ~Is 1')5~ (.. Received :l..=..tD ~ King County Hearing iner K.C. D.D.E.S. Traffic Impact Analysis Liber(v Grove TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... I PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................... I EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................................... I Roadways ............................................................................................................................................. 4 SE 128th Street. ................................................................................................................................. 4 SE 136th Street.. ................................................................................................................................ 4 156th Avenue SE ............................................................................................................................... 4 158th Avenue SE ............................................................................................................................... 4 160th Avenue SE ............................................................................................................................... 5 Transit/Non-Motorized Facilities .......................................................................................................... 5 Transit. ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Non-Motorized Facilities .................................................................................................................. 5 Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................................................... 5 Level of Service .................................................................................................................................... 5 Definition ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Accidents ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Planned and Programmed Improvements .............................................................................................. 8 FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROJECT ...................................................................................... 8 Background Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................................ 8 Pipeline Projects ............................................................................................................................... 8 Historical Growth ............................................................................................................................. 9 Level of Service .................................................................................................................................. II FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT ........................................................................................... 11 Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................................................. 11 Project Trip Generation .................................................................................................................. 11 Trip Distribution/fraffic Assignment ................................................................................................. 12 Level of Service .................................................................................................................................. 12 Pedestrian Facilities To/From Schools ............................................................................................... 15 Briarwood Elementary School ........................................................................................................ 15 Maywood Middle School ................................................................................................................ 15 Libeny High School... ..................................................................................................................... 15 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................... 15 TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION ........................................................................................................ 16 DN Traffic Consultants. Traffic Impact Analysis [,iherty Grove INTRODUCTION The following report was prepared to address the traffic impact analysis guidelines of King County for the Preliminary Plat of Liberty Grove located on the east and west side of 160th Avenue SE north and south of SE 136th Street in the Renton area of King County. A vicinity map is presented in Figure I. This report summarizes the process, findings, conclusions and recommendations of the traffic analysis. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Preliminary Plat of Liberty Grove contains 60 single family detached lots on 12.37 acres. The plat consists of two parcels. The parcel located on the west side of 160th Avenue SE and on the north side of SE 136th Street (future) contains 24 of the 60 lots with the remaining 36 on the east side of 160th Avenue SE and south side of SE 136th Street. Current zoning is R-4, which allows 4 units per acre. There are three existing single-family dwelling units located on Lots 24, 26/27, and 60. The units on Lots 24 and 60 will remain whereas the unit on Lots 26/27 will be removed. There are other out buildings located on other parcels that will be removed as part of the plat construction. Access to Lots 1-23 will be provided by SE 135th Place, a proposed east-west cul-de-sac extending to the west from 160th Avenue SE. Access to Lot 24, the existing single-family unit, will remain directly to 160th Avenue SE. A north-south stub road will provide access to SE 135th Place for Lots 18-23. Access to Lots 25-31 and 52-59 will be provided by SE 137th Street, a proposed east-west street intersecting with 160th Avenue SE on the west and a proposed north- south roadway on the east. Lots 33-50 will access directly to the proposed north-south roadway that extends from SE 136th on the north to a cul-de-sac on the south. Lots 32 and 51 have the option to access either SE 137th Street or the north-south roadway. Lot 60, another existing single-family unit will continue to access directly to 160th Avenue SE. The plat is expected to be fully occupied by 2005, which for the purposes of this analysis is assumed to be the horizon year. The preliminary site plan is presented in Figure 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS The Existing Conditions analysis provides a statement of the traffic-related conditions within the study area at the time of the writing of this report. The statement includes a discussion of the existing roadway, transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities serving the site; identification of existing peak hour traffic volumes and accident history at the analysis intersections; and identification of proposed transportation improvements in this area. DN Traffic Consultants Page I D ON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS i= :ls >-sd--1-,-,lli-PL -, -SE + , > < \ :; -- e " ~~q'---J 121ST _,,\ ~ +-"'~,.,,76-00_j,:._ SE r-\ JI~ ::X S£ 123RD ~ ·------1£~11j_--~ ST Pl -~ ---. ~ 12 !> ~ i • ~ "<~ ~ SE124TllPL; ~ PARK&;i:: :r ii! ! Ii> RIDE I;."; 1--' 8 -28TH~ ST ~~ ~ f ·~ ~: I7500 I w ~ _J;.f __ o,, >Go. -<i< SE 133 ST l34T11 !', CI', SE 135TH ;,; '" I ~? l3611l 1317300 m~ i: w :!; b ~ ~ 140TH ST < i::• :::::::; 142ND ST § ~8 S!: ~ ~ '""""" RD 24 ~ < a! ~ !'1 • I SE 25 \o VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1 SE 122ND' 0 ~ ~ SE 143RD m ST 144Tll 18400 J9111:s 19 t::j SJ sE 162\IIJ s"\ i=~SE~.H ii!~ 18400 .... <164TH PROPOSED PLAT OF LIBERlY GROVE ' ~ - ' I ~'1'~ ---- ' ~ i ' ,j ~ I DNTRAFFIC CONSULTANTS GIW'IOC SCALE LJ-,j , .... ) ·-·-ll ® CD .:. .:. .:. .,. .. ,li, ----- .:. .:. " .::. SITE PLAN FIGURE2 ' 11 e L:.• . -. .:.. I @1 I • I I "" .:.. .:. PROPOSED PLAT OF LIBERTY GROVE Traffic Impact Anazysis Libert,; Grove King County Ordinance# 11617 requires a traffic analysis of the project impact at all intersections, which receive 20 percent and 30 peak hour project generated trips. Based on the transportation concurrency model distribution for this site, the following intersections meet this criterion: >-' SE 136th Street/160th Avenue SE :,.. SE !28th Street/160th Avenue SE Although the intersection of 156th Avenue SE/SE I 28th Street does not meet the criteria, the results of the accident, traffic assignment and level of service analyses at this location are included for informational purposes. Roadways The roadways serving the proposed development include SE 128th Street, SE 1361h Street, 156°' Avenue SE, and 160th Avenue SE. These roadways are discussed in the following section. SE 121f' Street SE 128th Street, a principal arterial, runs from 1-405 in downtown Renton to SE May Valley Road in the Issaquah area of King County. In the vicinity of the site, SE 128th Street is approximately 60 feet wide with four lanes and paved asphalt shoulders. At the 156th Avenue SE intersection, there is curb, gutter and sidewalk and a westbound left-tum lane. Traffic control includes stop signs on the minor streets and signals at the major intersections including 156th Avenue SE. The posted speed limit is 35 mph west of 156th Avenue SE and 45 mph east of 156°' Avenue SE. SE IJffh Street SE 136th Street is a 20-foot wide gravel road from 152nd Avenue SE to 156°' Avenue SE. King County maintains the roadway near the intersection with 156°' Avenue SE. The remainder of the roadway to the west is a private street. SE 136th Street is a paved road from 160th Avenue SE to 162nd Avenue SE. Stop signs on SE 136th Street provide the traffic control at the intersection with 156th Avenue SE and 160th Avenue SE. With the construction of other plats in the area, SE 136°' Street will be constructed as a county roadway from 152nd Avenue SE to 160°' Avenue SE. J5r/1' Avenue SE 156th Avenue SE is a minor arterial that runs north/south from SE 128th Street to SE 142nd Street in the vicinity of the site and has one lane in each direction. The pavement width is approximately 24 feet with paved shoulders on the both sides of the roadway. Traffic control includes stop signs at the minor intersections and a signal at SE 128th Street. The posted speed is 35 mph. J 5/f' Avenue SE 158 1 h Avenue SE is a two-lane neighborhood collector that runs north and south from SE !28th Street and dead ends at approximately SE 136°' Street. The roadway width is approximately 24 feet with little to no dirt shoulders on both sides of the roadway. Traffic control includes a stop sign at SE 128th Street. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. No access to 158th Avenue SE is proposed as part of the Liberty Grove proposal. DN Traffic Consultants Page4 Traffic Impact Analysis Uher(v Grove J 6(/' A venue SE 160th Avenue SE is a two-lane neighborhood collector that runs north and south from SE I 25th Street to SE 144th Street in the vicinity of the site. The roadway width is approximately 24 feet with little to no dirt shoulders on the west side and a paved shoulder on the east side of the roadway. Traffic control includes a stop sign at SE 128th Street. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. Transit/Non-Motorized Facilities Transit King County Metro provides transit service in the vicinity of the site. Routes 111 and 114 provide service along SE !28th Street, SE 144th Street and 144th Avenue SE. There are two bus stops located near the proposed plat. One is located on the southeast comer of SE 128th Street/1561h Avenue SE and the second is located on the southeast comer of SE !28th Street/160th Avenue SE. During the week, service for Route 111 runs from 5:15 AM to 7:35 AM from 4: 15 PM to 6:45 PM with approximate 30-minute headways. Service for Route 114 runs from 6:45 AM to 9:00 AM and from 5:00 PM to 6:30 PM with approximate 30-minute headways. In addition, there is Renton Dial-a-Ride Transit (DART) service along SE !28th Street, Lake Kathleen Drive, SE 144th Street, and 1561h Avenue SE Monday through Friday. Non-Motorized Facilities There are currently no non-motorized facilities in the vicinity of the plat. Traffic Volumes Existing PM peak hour traffic volumes at the analysis intersections were determined from peak period turning movement counts collected during January 2003. Previous studies indicated the highest traffic volumes occurred during the PM peak hour as opposed to the AM period. The existing PM peak hour volumes are presented in Figure 3 _ Level of Service Definition Level of service (LOS) is used to qualify the degree of traffic congestion and driver comfort on streets or at intersections. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) describes the methodologies for calculating LOS on street segments and at signalized and unsignalized intersections. According to the 2000 HCM (TRB Special Report #209), there are six levels of service by which the operational performance of the roadway system may be described. These levels of service range from LOS A, which indicates a relatively free-flowing condition, to LOS F that indicates operational breakdown. The level of service for a two-way stop controlled (TWSC) intersection is determined by the computed or measured control delay and is defined for each minor movement. Level of service is DN Traffic Consultants Page5 ooo L3 j t l ;=~ ~~ 1tr f ~o!:! SE 136th Street NOT TO SCALE DNTRAFFIC CONSULTANTS w Ul .. > < ,:; .; "' SITE "' Ul ~ < ,:; 0 "' - 2003 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE3 SE 128th Street ola:o L 2 SE 134th Street Jtl -~ :~ it, o, 0:2"' / ///. w Ul .. > < " C N CD (XX) -PM PEAK PER HOUR PROPOSED PLAT OF LIBERTY GROVE Traffic Impact .1nalvsis liberty Grove not defined for the intersection as a whole. Average control delay less than or equal to I 0 seconds per vehicle is defined as LOS A. For LOS F, the average control delay is greater than 50 seconds per vehicle. The LOS for signalized intersections is defined in terms of average control delay per vehicle. The criterion for LOS A is an average control delay of less than or equal to IO seconds per vehicle. The criterion for LOS F is an average control delay of greater than 80 seconds. King County has adopted a level of service E as the county road capacity standard. According to Ordinance # 11617 any development that impacts an intersection with 20 perceqt of the peak hour project generated trips and 30 project generated peak hour trips must provide a level of service E with full development of the project. If the level of service is below LOS E for the without project condition, the developer is responsible to maintain the existing level of service. Level of service for the signalized intersection was calculated using Synchro™ and the McTrans version of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, HCS-2000 was used for the unsignalized intersections. The results of the existing condition level of service analysis are shown in Table I. Table 1 2001 Existing Level of Service Intersection SE 128"' Street/ 160"' Ave SE Southbound' SE 136"' Street/160"' Ave SE Westbound' SE 128"' Street/156'h Ave SE Traffic Control Two-Way Stop One-Way Stop Overall Si""al (xx) -seconds of delay per vehicle. I -Level of service for the movement with the highest delay is shown. 2001 Existing D (27.4) A (8.7) C (25.0) LOS Standard E E E As shown in Table I, both of the analysis intersections operate at an acceptable level of service. The SE 128th Street/156th Avenue SE intersection also operates at an acceptable LOS. Accidents The latest three-year accident history data at the analysis intersections were obtained from King County. The latest three-year accident history included the period from January I, 1999 to December 31, 2001. A summary of the three-year accident history is presented in Table 2. Table 2 Three-Year Accident Historv Intersection SE 128"' St/156"' Ave SE SE 128"' St/160"' Ave SE SE 136th St/160th Ave SE I) -Accident rate per million entering vehicles No. of Accidents 1999 2000 4 6 5 2 0 0 2001 3 4 0 2) -Average accident rate for type of intersection per WSDOT DN Traffic Consultants Acc. Avg. Rate' Rate' 0.53 0.90 0.56 1.30 0 0.90 Page? 7ra!]ic Impact .1na!rsis U ber~v Grove As shown in Table 2, the accident rates for all analysis intersections are below the state average for similar intersections. Of the accidents at the SE 128th Street/160th Avenue SE intersection, five (5) were rear end, two (2) were right angle, and two (2) were left turn. Of the accidents at the SE 128th Street/1561 h Avenue SE intersection, six (6) were left turn, two (2) were rear end, and three (3) were right angle. Planned and Programmed Improvements A review of King County's Planned and Programmed Transportation Improvements indicate the following transportation improvement projects planned in the study area. • 149th Avenue SE (Maple Valley Highway to Elliot Bridge) CIP #400588. North of Jones Road -Construct three-lane approach with a left-tum lane, two through lanes. South ofJones Road -Construct a three-lane approach road with one 12-foot center turn lane, two through lanes with curb, gutter, and sidewalks. This project is related to CIP #401288. Presently the County is conducting further environmental studies and preparing a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. • 154th Place SE/SE 142"" Place (SE Jones Road to 156th Avenue SE) King County Roads. Realign roadway, widen roadway, pave shoulders, and construct bike lane on shoulder. • 156th Avenue SE (SE 142"d Place to SE 128th Street) King County Roads. Pave shoulders. • Jones Road (149th Avenue SE to SR 169) Private. Pave shoulders. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROJECT The Future Conditions without Project analysis provides a discussion of the traffic-related conditions in the horizon year without the proposed project. This section includes a discussion of background traffic volumes and level of service at the analysis intersections in the horizon year. Liberty Grove is expected to be fully occupied by 2005, market permitting. Therefore, 2005 for the purposes of this analysis is considered to be the horizon year. Background Traffic Volumes Background traffic volumes for the 2005 without project condition include the 2003 existing PM peak hour traffic volumes, PM peak hour traffic generated by known pipeline projects in the vicinity of the site, and area-wide traffic growth. Pipeline Projects Pipeline projects are defined as proposed development, which are expected to be fully developed and impact the transportation system within the horizon year of Liberty Grove. King County and the City of Renton identified the following proposed projects in the general vicinity of Liberty Grove. Daily and PM peak hour trip generation for the proposed projects are presented in Table 3. DN Traffic Consultants Page8 Traffic Impact Analvsis Libert,; Grove Table 3 Pipeline Projects PM Peak Location Land Use Total In Out King County 13615 154"' Ave SE 59 sfdu's 60 38 22 158XX SE 136"' Street 75 sfdu·s 76 48 28 13815 160"' Ave SE 24 sfdu's 24 15 9 13305 160th Ave SE 22 sfdu's 22 14 8 139XX 162nd Ave SE 5 sfdu's 5 3 2 13606 156th Ave SE II sfdu's II 7 4 141XX 162"d Ave SE 38 sfdu's 38 24 14 SE 132"d St/164"' Ave SE 4 sfdu's 4 3 City of Renton 131" St/Jericho Avenue NE (Sienna) 62 sfdu's 63 40 23 NE 4th St/Rosario Avenue (Amberwood) 18 sfdu's 18 12 6 N. & S. side of SE 128th St (Morgan Place) 46 sfdu's 46 30 16 14606 SE 136th St (Parkside Court) 21 sfdu's 21 13 8 5715 SE 128th St (Morgan Court I) 7 sfdu's 7 4 3 5710 SE 128th St (Morgan Court II) 7 sfdu's 7 4 3 5800 SE 128"' St (Madison Landing) 8 sfdu's 8 5 3 SE 128th St/Nile Avenue NE (Maplewood Estates) 218 sfdu's 220 141 79 NE 4th St/Jericho Avenue (Honeybrook) 25 sfdu's 25 16 9 NE 4th St/ 150th Avenue SE (Eagle Ridge) 17 sfdu's 17 II 6 NE 4th St/Nile Avenue (Buttar) 17 sfdu's 17 LL 6 NE 2"<l St/Nile Avenue (Peterson) 8 sfdu's 8 5 3 Total 692 697 444 253 As shown in Table 3, the pipeline projects are expected to generate approximately 697 PM peak hour trips. Trip distribution/traffic assignments for the pipeline projects were determined from King County concurrency data and existing turning movement counts in the area. Historical Growth A comparison of PM peak hour turning movement counts in the vicinity of the plat indicate that PM peak hour volumes have decreased by approximately 14 percent since 200 I. The exact explanation for this is unknown. It could be simply the downturn in the economy or the fact the previous counts included extensive home construction related traffic that has diminished during the last two years. As a result, it was decided to factor existing counts at a rate of I. 0 percent per year consistent with the growth rate used for previous traffic studies in this area. Existing 2003 PM peak hour volumes were factored by 1.02 to represent the historical growth portion of the background traffic. A summary of the background traffic volumes is presented in Figure 4. DN Traffic Consultants Page9 SE 136th Street 111 !.. L 24 _J ~ l ;::-: 11 _J , tr o-25, II:~"' NOT TO SCALE DNTRAFFIC CONSULTANTS w (/) !I < ~ .; "' _0 ., L1 _!il ;::-:1 o_J it r --61' ;!OIi! % /-/ / ./// SITE w (/) !I < IC -0 "' - SE 134th Street . . / ;-f/. / / /· / / // // w (/) !I < " C "' "' - SE 128th Street ~:a.. L 2 -1, l ;::-~ ~~ ,tr 3 ....... ' -- (XX) -PM PEAK PER HOUR 2005 WITHOUT PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE4 PROPOSED PLAT OF LIBERTY GROVE Traffic Impact Analysis liberty Grove Level of Service The 2005 background without project PM peak hour level of service at the analysis intersections is presented in Table 4. The existing level of service is shown for comparison purposes. Table4 2005 Without Project Level of Service 2001 2005 Intersection Traffic Control Existin2 Without Proiect LOS Standard SE 136th Street/160"' Ave SE Westbound' One-Way Stop A (8.7) Eastbound1 Two-Way Stop2 A (9.6) SE 128th Street/160th Ave SE Northbound 1 Two-Way Stop D (27.4) D (34.3) SE 128"' Street/ 156"' Ave SE Overall Si=I C (25.0l C (31.8) (xx) -seconds of delay per vehicle. I -Level of service for the movement with the highest delay is shown. 2 -SE 136th Street will be constructed from 156"' Avenue SE to 160"' Avenue SE as part of the plat of Evendell, a current pipeline project, thereby creating a two-way stop controlled intersection. E E E As shown in Table 4, all analysis intersections will operate at an acceptable level of service in 2005 without the project. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT The Future Conditions with Project analysis provides a statement of what traffic related conditions will be like in the horizon year with the project. The analysis simply adds anticipated project impacts to the horizon year background conditions. The analysis defines anticipated project trip generation and evaluates impact through a level of service analysis at each of the analysis intersections. Traffic Volumes Traffic volumes for 2005 with project condition include 2005 without project volumes discussed above plus expected traffic to be generated by Liberty Grove. Project Trip Generation Trip generation for Liberty Grove was calculated using the trip generation rates for Single-Family Dwelling Units, Land Use Code 210 presented in the Sixth Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Report, 1997. A summary of the anticipated trip generation for Liberty Grove is presented in Table 5. DN Traffic Consultants Page II Traffic Impact Ana~ysis Liberty Grove Table 5 Trip Generation AM Peak PM Peak Land Use AWDT Total In Out Total In Out Liberty Grove-60 sfdu' s 574 44 II 33 61 39 22 Existing -3 sfdu's 29 2 I I 3 2 I Net Impact 545 42 10 32 58 37 21 As shown in Table 5, Liberty Grove is estimated to generate 574 daily, 44 AM peak, and 61 PM peak hour trips. However, with the credit for the three existing single family dwelling units, the net impact of the project will be 545 daily, 42 AM peak and 58 PM peak hour trips. Trip Distributionfl'raffic Assignment Trip distribution percentages for Liberty Grove were based on an evaluation of PM peak hour turning movement counts collected at the analysis intersections. Trip distribution percentages for the pipeline projects were derived from the percentages determined for the Liberty Grove analysis and King County Transportation Concurrency Analysis where available. The results of the trip distribution/traffic assignment process for project-generated trips are presented in Figure 5. A summary of the 2005 with project PM peak hour volumes are presented in Figure 6. Level of Service The 2005 with project PM peak hour level of service at the analysis intersections are shown in Table 6. The existing condition and 2005 without project PM peak hour level of service are provided for comparison. Table 6 2005 With Project Level of Service 2001 2005 2005 LOS Intersection Traffic Control E:ustin2 N Site Access/ 160"' Ave SE Without Proiect With Proiect Standard Eastbonnd1 S Site Access/160"' Ave SE One-Way Stop n/a n/a A (9.5) E Westbonnd1 SE 128"' Street/160"' Ave SE One-Way Stop n/a n/a A (8.8) E Southbonnd 1 Two-Way Stop D (27.4) D (343) E(37.l) E SE 136"' Street/160"' Ave SE Westbonnd1 One-Way Stop A (8.7) E Eastbonnd1 Two-Way Stop2 A (9.6) A (9.9) SE 128"' Street/156"' Ave SE Overall Si<m~I C 125.0) C (31.8) C (32.0) E (xx) -seconds of delay per vehicle. I -Level of service for the movement with the highest delay is shown. 2 -SE 136"' Street will be constructed from 156"' Avenue SE to 160th Avenue SE as part of the plat of Evendell. a current pipeline project, thereby creating a two-way stop controlled intersection. DN Traffic Consultants Page 12 (37%) SE 136th Street NOT TO SCALE ON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS ~ "' U) t < .c .; "' ,12 13, 11 .... ..:..L {37%) ""iY SE 128th Street "' U) t < .c -"' .., S! :!: j + 1.....J it 1, .... SE 1 J4th Street -~ t l t, .... "'J ~ "' U) ...... t ~ < <O "' ..c ~ -0 "' ~ 2005 WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURES it ..... i 1, N II! t < " C " "' (XX) -PM PEAK PER HOUR PROPOSED PLAT OF LIBERTY GROVE I ooo L3 Jtl ~~ 0 _J I I 71J6--...... --,_ N 0 f N - SE 136th Street DNTRAFFIC CONSULTANTS t:l l! < "' U) "' SE 128th Street w "' t < "' «i .. "' 2:: - Jt 7_J it 1, SE 134th Street =i ;! tl ti Si" w "' .. > < "' -0 <O 2005 WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURES w "' ! < .,, " N "' {XX) -PM PEAK PER HOUR PROPOSED PLAT OF LIBERTY GROVE I Traffic Impact Ana(vsis Liberty Grove As shown in Table 6, the analysis intersections will operate at an acceptable level of service in 2005 with the project Pedestrian Facilities To/From Schools Briarwood Elementary School Briarwood Elementary School is located on SE 1341h Street, east of 1681h Avenue SE. The route to this school from Liberty Grove would likely be via north on 1601h Avenue SE, east on SE 1281h Street, south on 1681h Avenue SE, and east on SE 1341h Street, which is approximately 1-1/4 miles. Pedestrian facilities on 1601h Avenue SE north of SE 136th Street include a paved shoulder on the east side of the roadway. On SE 128th Street pedestrian facilities include a paved shoulder on the south side of the road. Paved shoulders are provided on the east side of 168th Avenue SE and on the north side of SE 134th Street. Elementary students will most like be bussed since the distance from the plat to Briarwood is longer than the mile restriction on bussing. Maywood Middle School Maywood Middle School is located on 168th Avenue SE south of SE 1441h Street. The route to this school from Liberty Grove would likely be via south on 160th Avenue SE, east on SE 144th Street, and south on 1681h Avenue SE, which is approximately I mile. Pedestrian facilities on 1601h Avenue SE, south of SE 1361h Street, include little to no shoulder on the either side of the roadway. On SE 144th Street, pedestrian facilities include a paved shoulder on both sides of the road. A sidewalk is provided on the east side of 1681h Avenue SE. These students would be on the border of the bussing limitation. Liberty High School Liberty High School is located on 168th Avenue SE south of SE 136th Street. The route to this school from Liberty Grove would likely be via north on 160th Avenue SE, east on SE 128th Street, and south on 168th Avenue SE, which is approximately 1-1/2 miles. Pedestrian facilities on 160th Avenue SE, north of SE 136th Street, include a paved shoulder on the east side of the roadway. On SE 1281h Street pedestrian facilities include a paved shoulder on the south side of the road. A paved shoulder is provided on the east side of 168th Avenue SE. High school students would likely be bussed. CONCLUSIONS The plat of Liberty Grove will not create any significant adverse conditions on the surrounding transportation network. The plat will generate approximately 547 daily, 42 AM peak hour and 58 PM peak hour new vehicle trips. As determined from the analysis, the plat will impact two intersections as defined by the County intersection analysis standard. The intersections include SE 1281h Street/l 60th Avenue SE and SE 1361h Street/ 1601h Avenue SE. All analysis intersections were determined to operate at an acceptable level of service for the 2005 with and without project conditions. DN Traffic Consultants Page 15 Traffic Impact Ana(vs1s l,iberty Grove TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION Liberty Grove will be required to pay a MPS mitigation fee of$121,923 (57*$2,139) based on a fee of $2,139 per unit for Mitigation Payment System Zone 452. No other traffic mitigation is deemed necessary. DN Traffic Consultants Page 16 Traffic Impact Analvsis ' DN Traffic Consultams Liberty Grove TECHNICAL APPENDIX for LIBERTY GROVE King County Transportation Concurrency Activity on Zone 763 '· '""T'~c-,F!I', .·, l·li""''P~'~AII"''' I ' -~ 1Urtllf~,;::,c\'~· .. ·~: · ~ .'.· ;~iit-i"j . ==·=~~'$".~-... , ·,-... • -~" -· ,;.~_.,;;;;; APP~OVE 102-05-21-02 j13612 16oth Avenue SE jSingle F<1_mily Re,sid_e,ritia_l ____ 601_ -1-.... _________ Z§3,452 APPROVE (02-0~-10-02 113815 .. 1,SQ!h Av,enue SE. )?.!,rtgle Family ,ReJict,Ei.r:,!!al . ___ }_4 , _ _!) __ _ ___ !63 i52 A!'P_R.Q\/E ~Q?_-Q5-0ll,-Q1j141x,x 1_62nd Avenue ?E.. ~Sin!te J:am_ily_~eJJderi~J.... ----~~ __ o ___ ___ 763 '!§2_ APPROV_E J01:10-30-03 J13305 16oth Ave. SE )Single Fam_ily ,Residentia~ ______ 22 _ _ _ 0 __ . !,02PQ011 _ __ _763 1 452 I APPROVE 'I01-05-14-01113606156thAve.SE ;Single Family Residential 11 Oj L01P0016 76 1 3'452 I i~~:~¥E-~ttt~;:i~ ,a~f; r:4~~;,_~\iE ---j~:;~~!1~i~a1i;~:~~I--~ ::-~ __ J --~OO~e-~:~_1_5~ ~~::_-~:=: ~i} ;:r~ APPROVE 196-10-30-01 !16655 SE 136 St iH1gh School t O 172464 A96P0036 B96C0196 763 452 APPR<?_~E _ \~6-Qt.f~-01 J154 ?.E.~ SE 1_~2 :· _ j~irigle_l:aE!ilY.. ~!l~(dentiai =--=---1 -----Q A96Poii4s L96S003s-:.:.= -f63 452 - 1/31/03 4:08 PM GNorris 763 1-30-03 Location: 160th SE & SE 135th St. Olecker: NG Weather: Partly Sunny Date: 21-Jan-03 Start Time: 5:00 PM 15 Min. Adj Factor; F(adj)= 1.0000 (15 min/# of minutes counted) END TIME 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM 7:00 PM PKHR Adj HR END TIME 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM 7:00 PM PKHR Adj HR RIGHT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIGHT 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 END TIME 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 FROM: NORTH THRU 21 13 18 18 0 0 0 0 70 70 FROM: SOUTH THRU 3 6 6 10 0 0 0 0 25 25 15 Min TOTALS 31 27 27 32 0 0 0 0 LEFT TOTAL TRUCKS RIGHT 2 23 0 3 4 17 0 2 0 18 0 1 2 20 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 78 0 8 8 78 0 8 LEFT TOTAL TRUCKS RIGHT 0 5 0 0 0 8 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 10 0 0 ---- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 2 0 0 30 2 0 Time Start -End 17:00 18:00 17:15 18:15 17:30 18:30 17:45 18:45 18:00 19:00 Oty/Town: King Co. Project: ,.;c0.c.1 ·..c00c.c2c..0"-7 ____ , Pk Hr: ! 5:00 PM 6:00 PM FROM: EAST THRU LEFT TOTAL TRUCKS 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 . -------- 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 0 0 1 9 0 FROM: WEST THRU LEFT TOTAL TRUCKS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 hrvol pk hr? 117 YES 86 no 59 no 32 no 0 no DN Traffic './ / INTERSECTION: PEAK HOUR: DATE: SOURCE: 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factors: 160th SE & SE 135th St. 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 21-Jan-03 DnTraffic PEAK HOUR DIRECllONAL LEG VOLUMES 78 33 0 9 0 13 71 30 PEAK HOUR APPROACH VOLUME MOVEMENTS 78 0 70 8 RIGHT THRU LEFT LEFT NORTH ~:, THRU WEST EAST RIGHT SOUTH LEFT LEFT THRU RIGHT 0 25 5 I 30 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS DERIVED FROM COUNT From North: 0.85 SB From South: 0.75 NB From East: 0.75 WB From West: nja EB Total 0.91 8 0 1 Percent Trucks & Buse: From North: 0.0% SB From South: 6.7% NB From East: 0.0% WB From West: n/a EB DN Tntfflc 9 Location: 160th SE & SE 136th St. Checker: NG Weather: Date: 21-Jan-03 Start Time: Partiy Sunny 4:00 PM City[Town: King Co. 01-002.07 Project: Pk Hr: ! 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 15 Min. Adj Factor; F(adj)= 1.0000 (15 min/# of minutes counted) END TIME 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 6:00 PM PKHR Adj HR END TIME 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 6:00 PM PKHR Adj HR RIGHT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIGHT 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 END TIME 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 FROM: NORTH THRU LEFT TOTAL 14 2 16 8 4 12 20 0 20 19 2 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 8 69 61 8 69 FROM: SOUTH THRU LEFT TOTAL 4 0 7 4 0 4 2 0 2 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 19 16 0 19 15 Min TOTALS 23 16 24 28 0 0 0 0 FROM: EAST TRUCKS RIGHT THRU LEFT TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 0 2 0 1 3 FROM: WEST TRUCKS RIGHT THRU LEFT TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 ---- 2 0 0 0 0 . ·------------~---·~~- 0 0 0 0 0 ------ 0 0 0 0 0 ----- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -·------ 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 lime Start -End hr vol pk hr? 16:00 17:00 91 YES 16:15 17:15 68 no 16:30 17:30 52 no 16:45 17:45 28 no 17:00 18:00 0 no DN Traffic TRUCKS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRUCKS 0 0 0 ---- 0 -----~ 0 ------~-- 0 0 ·-----· 0 -- 0 0 INTERSEcnON: 160th SE & SE 136th St. PEAK HOUR: 4:00 PM 5:00 PM DATE: 21-Jan-03 SOURCE: DnTraffic PEAK HOUR DIRECTlONAL LEG VOLUMES 69 18 0 3 0 11 62 19 PEAK HOUR APPROACH VOLUME MOVEMENTS 69 0 61 8 RIGHT THRU LEFT 0 LEFT NORTH ~:, 2 0 0 THRU WEST EAST 0 3 0 RIGHT SOUTH LEFT 1 LEFT THRU RIGHT 0 16 3 I 19 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS DERIVED FROM COUNT Peak Hour Factors: From North: 0.82 SB From South: 0.68 NB From East: 0.38 WB From West: n/a EB Total 0.81 Percent Trucks & Buse From North: 0.0% SB From South: 10.5% NB From East: 0.0% WB From West: n/a EB ON Traffic Location: 160th SE & SE 128th St. Checker: NG Weather: Partly Sunny Date: 28-Jan-03 Start Time: 4:00 PM 15 Min. Adj Factor; F(adj)= 1.0000 (15 min/# of minutes counted) END TIME 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM S:45 PM 6:00 PM PKHR Adj HR END TIME 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 6:00 PM PKHR Adj HR RIGHT 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 RIGHT 7 4 3 r-------------·- 5 10 2 2 9 22 22 END TIME 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 FROM: NORTH THRU LEFT 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 FROM: SOUTH THRU LEFT 0 2 0 8 0 5 ··-~ 0 1 0 5 0 5 - 0 7 0 5 ---- 0 19 0 19 15 Min TOTALS 358 359 379 339 367 351 343 348 TOTAL TRUCKS RIGHT 3 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 2 4 0 1 4 0 1 TOTAL TRUCKS RIGHT 9 0 13 12 2 8 8 0 15 6 0 17 15 0 8 7 0 7 9 0 19 14 0 14 41 2 48 41 2 48 lime Start -End 16:00 17:00 16:15 17:15 16:30 17:30 16:45 17:45 17:00 18:00 Oty(fown: King Co. Project: ,.;;o.;;.1-..co.;;.;02;;;..0.;;.;7 ____ ~ Pk Hr: ! 4:15 PM 5:15 PM FROM: EAST THRU LEFT TOTAL TRUOS 147 9 156 1 166 12 178 5 171 9 180 1 149 14 163 3 169 9 179 2 176 6 183 8 158 7 167 0 137 10 149 2 655 44 700 11 655 44 700 11 FROM: WEST THRU LEFT TOTAL TRUCKS 177 0 190 0 159 0 167 0 174 0 189 0 153 0 170 0 165 0 173 0 152 0 159 0 147 0 166 0 -~·~----.--- 171 0 185 0 - 651 0 699 0 651 0 699 0 hr vol ok hr? 1435 no 1444 YES 1436 no 1400 no 1409 no ON Traffic I INTERSECITON: PEAK HOUR: DATE: SOURCE: 0 699 651 48 Peak Hour Factors: 160th SE & SE 128th St. 4:15 PM 5:15 PM 28-Jan-03 DnTraffic PEAK HOUR DIREcnONAL LEG VOLUMES 4 1 675 700 699 676 92 41 PEAK HOUR APPROACH VOLUME MOVEMENTS 4 1 0 3 RIGHT THRU LEFT LEFT NORTH ;~1 THRU WEST EAST RIGHT SOUTH LEFT THRU RIGHT 19 0 22 I 41 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS DERIVED FROM COUNT From North: 0.50 SB From South: 0.68 NB From East: 0.97 WB From West: 0.92 EB Total 0.95 1 655 44 Percent Trucks & Buse From North: 0.0% SB From South: 4.9% NB From East: 1.6% WB From West: 0.0% EB DN Traffic 700 Location: Checker: SE 128th & 156th Ave SE DN Date: 22-Jan-03 Weather: Raining Start Time: 4:00 PM 15 Min. Adj Factor; F(adi)= 1.0714 (15 min/# of minutes counted) END TIME 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 6:00 PM PKHR Adj HR END TIME 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 6:00 PM PKHR Adj HR FROM: NORlli RIGHT lliRU LEFT 2 0 0 0 0 0 ·----. 1 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FROM: SOUlli RIGHT lliRU LEFT 21 0 48 18 0 42 13 0 38 --~------ 27 0 42 -------------·---·- 23 0 31 -- 20 0 43 ~------------ 25 0 43 20 0 43 ------------ 95 0 159 102 0 170 END 15 Min TIME TOTALS 16:15 474 16:30 463 16:45 474 17:00 508 17:15 514 17:30 473 17:45 512 18:00 474 TOTAL TRUCKS RIGHT 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 1 3 TOTAL TRUCKS RIGHT 69 5 68 60 2 78 - 51 0 91 69 4 97 ----·----------- 54 1 90 63 0 82 68 1 91 63 0 75 --- 254 6 360 272 6 386 Time Start -End 16:00 17:00 16:15 17:15 16:30 17:30 16:45 17:45 17:00 18:00 Oty(Town: Project: King Co Liberty Grove Pk Hr: I 4:45 PM 5:45 PM FROM: EAST lliRU LEFT TOTAL 106 64 170 84 64 148 -------- 84 58 142 -- 111 60 172 100 81 181 83 76 160 78 74 153 87 72 159 - 372 291 666 399 312 714 FROM: WEST lliRU LEFT TOTAL 131 2 201 146 0 224 157 0 248 136 0 233 155 0 245 ------·-------··-- 136 0 218 166 0 257 145 0 220 593 0 953 635 0 1021 hr vol pk hr? 1919 no 1959 no 1%9 no 2007 YES 1973 no DN Traffic TRUCKS 3 4 1 4 2 6 6 2 18 19 TRUOKS 8 7 7 2 4 --------- 3 -- 4 5 - 13 14 INTERSECTION: PEAK HOUR: DATE: SOURCE: 0 I 1021 635 386 Peak Hour Factors: SE 128th & 156th Ave SE 4:45 PM 5:45 PM 22-Jan-03 DnTraffic PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL LEG VOLUMES 03 569 714 1021 737 698 272 PEAK HOUR APPROACH VOLUME MOVEMENTS 0 0 0 0 RIGHT THRU LEFT LEFT NORTH RIGHT THRU WEST EAST THRU RIGHT SOUTH LEFT LEFT THRU RIGHT 170 0 102 I 272 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS DERIVED FROM COUNT From North: n/a SB From South: 0.92 NB From East: 0.92 WB From West: 0.93 EB Total 0.98 3 399 312 Percent Trucks & Buses From North: n/a SB From South: 2.2% NB From East: 2.7% WB From West: 1.4% EB DN Traffic 714 I Liberty Grove SE 128th Street/16oth Ave SE PM PEAK HOUR .. .,. .. " "- ::!i "-.., ~ "' I (!) " C: ~ If [il a, l "- " C: 8. a: 0 u "' C: li' .. 0 " ·e "- " C: i "- C: ~ " 0:: l "- 'S 0 ;!, ~ "' 8 N " > e (!) ~ 1l ::, 0 " ·e "- "' "' ~ ~ ls 0 .. u.. " 0 :,: .,. .. " "- !! ~ a, .. .,. " 2 I- "E " !,! " "- EBLT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 651 13 9 12 685 0 685 0.92 0 EBRT 48 1 12 0 61 13 74 WBLT 44 1 22 0 67 12 79 WBT 655 13 5 26 699 0 699 0.97 1.6 WBRT 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 NBLT 19 0 3 0 14 3 17 NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.68 4.9 NBRT 22 0 13 0 35 9 44 SBLT 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 SBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 SBRT 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1444 28 64 38 1566 37 1603 2/9/20038:06 PM Liberty Grove North Site Access/16Dth Avenue SE PM PEAK HOUR ~ .. .. 0.. ::; 0. "' ~ ,: l "I;! ~ e "' ~ u .. m -{!l .. ~ 0.. .. i ii: 0 <..) "' C Si' .. 1l e' 0.. .. .!. I 0. C .s C " I>'. 1l ·e- 0.. ] .c ., :s: ~ ~ (!) ~ ~ 1l ·e 0.. .c ., :s: 8 N 6 15 .. IL '5 0 :I: ~ :ll n. "' .. ., ~ m "' ~ u ~ E " e l EBLT 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.9 a EBRT 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 WBLT 0 0 0 0 0 0 a WBT 0 0 a 0 0 0 a 0.9 0 WBRT 0 0 0 0 0 a a NBLT 0 0 0 0 a 5 5 NBT 20 a 14 0 26 5 31 0.9 0 NBRT 0 a 0 0 a a a SBLT 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 SBT 76 2 26 a 104 14 118 0.9 0 SBRT 0 a 0 0 0 10 10 96 2 40 a 130 42 172 2/9/20038:06 PM Liberty Grove South Stte Access/16Dth Avenue SE PM PEAK HOUR "' 3 0 :,: "" m 0.. ::;; 0.. (') ~ "' I Cl "" C :, e Jl 0 .. m tl " ·e- 0.. " C 8- ii: 0 0 0, C S2 !l i o' ii: " C 8- ii: C .8 C " "' ~ e 0.. ;; 0 ~ ~ " e Cl ~ 1l ::; i 0.. "' ~ s: "' 0 0 N ~ tl .. IL 3 0 :,: " .. " 0.. rl "' :, ~ " 0 2 .... "E ~ " 0.. EBLT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.9 0 EBRT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBLT 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.9 0 WBRT 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 NBLT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 21 0 14 0 35 5 40 0.9 0 NBRT 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 SBLT 0 0 0 0 0 14 14 SBT 68 1 18 0 87 1 88 0.9 0 SBRT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 32 0 122 37 159 Liberty Grove SE 136th St/160th Ave SE PM PEAK HOUR 5 0 I -" m " Q. ::;; Q. ij .c 1 Cl "" " ::, e "' -" !;l "' J!l g ·ir 11. .. " l a: 0 0 go !i2 .. 1l e' 11. .. " l ii: " ~ " "' 1l e' 11. ] .c "' $'. ~ .. e Cl ~ .!! :::; 1l e' 11. aa $'. ~ 6 1l .. "- 5 0 I -" .. .. Q. .. 31 ::, "' ~ u 2 I- "E " ~ Q. EBLT 0 0 6 0 6 0 6 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBRT 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 WBLT 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.38 0 WBRT 2 0 0 0 2 1 3 NBLT 0 0 6 0 14 4 18 NBT 18 0 8 0 18 9 27 0.68 10.5 NBRT 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 $BLT 9 0 0 0 9 1 10 SBT 67 1 15 0 83 15 98 0.82 0 SBRT 0 0 11 0 11 0 11 100 49 0 150 31 181 2/5/200311 :34 PM Liberty Grove SE 128th Streel/166th Ave SE PM PEAK HOUR .. "' ill o._ :; o._ "' 8 N .c i Cl "" C => e Jf <.) .. "' &l ·e o._ " .~ 8. 0: 0 {.) "' C " i ·e o._ .. C J o._ " .s " " It'. u " ·e Q. 5 0 ~ ~ ~ e Cl ~ z :::; &l £ .c ~ :;: ~ ~ .. "- "i 0 :c "' .. " o._ "' :J! => ~ "' <.) ~ c ~ " o._ EBLT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 635 13 33 12 693 13 706 0.93 1.4 EBRT 386 8 38 4 438 0 438 WBLT 312 6 5 0 323 0 323 WBT 399 8 5 26 434 3 437 0.92 2.7 WBRT 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 NBLT 170 3 30 7 = 5 227 NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.92 2.2 NBRT 102 2 3 0 107 0 107 SBLT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBRT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007 40 114 49 2218 21 2239 2/5/200311 :36 PM Liberty Grove SE 136th Street/156th Ave SE PM PEAK HOUR .. 3 0 I "' .. ~ :. ll. "' ~ "' I (!) "C C J e D> "' i;l "' ii ·e 0. .. C 'ii C. ii: 0 u D> C SI j!j .. ·e- ll. " .£ ,; C. ii: C B C " "' ii ·e- ll. ;; 0 2 s: "' ~ " e (!) ~ 1! ::J " " e ll. 2 s: ~ ~ .. u_ :3 0 I "' .. " ll. .. il! J ID .. "' 0 2 .... g 0.. EBLT 0 0 11 0 11 0 11 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.23 0 EBRT 1 0 10 14 25 0 25 WBLT 0 0 8 0 8 0 8 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBRT 0 0 12 0 24 5 29 NBLT 0 0 4 25 29 0 29 NBT 186 4 3 7 200 0 200 0.86 0.4 NBRT 0 0 6 0 6 0 6 SBLT 0 0 8 0 8 0 8 SBT 621 12 5 0 638 0 638 0.86 0.6 SBRT 2 0 34 0 36 0 36 810 16 101 46 985 5 990 215/200311 :30 PM SE 128th ST & 160th Avenue SE Liberty Grove 3: Int 2003 PM Peak .)--" • -'-~ t I" \. + -c" Mcr··=ern·1·'~'"'""''''"'''''·•Iset?'''E!Bm'''1!1:BB'"""Wl!Ut"JW:Bifi1''WBS:''""'lilalill'~·1llillll~NS'B'''''~SE!"''TSB'l'lf;l"''S!:1B , 'MiOO ""'" .:lk1~~~il@F?:t!lii{l(t;H\Ai1L -. -;,,~iirnt :.--__ : J~f):; .: ... --" );;,_., ,. --_ ·:,;:;;_ ._ .:. '.J%{< ·. _ -}illJli . __ i;~!l!t :-'. -:-,;~!CTF'ti . _ ,: ':t1~1[':. '" :'.(;;;11;::. ._,-_Jjf;}t -. Lane Configurations Sign Control Grade Volume (veh/h) 0 Peak Hour Factor 0,92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 0 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 713 vC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol IC, single (s) 4.1 IC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 2.2 pO queue free % 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 883 ~iricfion~11 Volume Total 354 Volume Left 0 Volume Right 0 cSH 883 Volume to Capacity 0.00 Queue Length (ft) 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) 0.0 Approach LOS Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization 2/6/2003 garrysbell- +ff. Free 0% 651 48 0.92 0.92 708 52 406 404 0 48 52 0 1700 848 0.24 0.06 0 4 0.0 1.7 A 0.9 1.2 42.8% 4"f. Free 0% 44 655 1 19 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 48 712 1 21 760 1186 4.1 7.5 2.2 3.5 94 85 848 138 357 45 4 0 21 3 1 24 1 1700 236 165 0.21 0.19 0.03 0 17 2 0.0 23.8 27.4 C D 23.8 27.4 C D ICU Level of Service 4+ Stop 0% 0 22 0.92 0.92 0 24 None 1542 380 6.5 6.9 4.0 3.3 100 96 108 618 A 4+ Stop oiro 3 0 1 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 0 1 None 1186 1568 357 7.5 6.5 6.9 3.5 4.0 3.3 98 100 100 133 104 640 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 SE 128th ST & 160th Avenue SE 3: Int -t -t Liberty Grove 2005 PM Peak w/o Project + Lane Configurations .fl+ .fl+ .;. .;. Stop Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 0 685 61 67 699 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) O 745 66 73 760 Pedestrians Lane Width (fl) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 cont vol tC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) po queue free % cM capacity (veh/h) 761 811 4.1 4.1 2.2 2.2 100 91 847 811 1 0.92 1 14 0.92 15 1304 7.5 3.5 86 110 0% 0 0.92 0 None 1684 6.5 4.0 100 85 35 3 0.92 0.92 38 3 405 1316 6.9 7.5 3.3 3.5 94 97 595 101 0% 0 0.92 0 None 1717 6.5 4.0 100 81 1 0.92 1 380 6.9 3.3 100 617 MfaZ,Cd .,.~1<c.s=-" ,.: ••:n <i"'""i°i'"''""""""ll:•11•_...,..,...,.,.,..,B'"'l"'1t1c""~"'='""":"='"-""'mlllmJ~®£'l""""'ii£"8:•:;w-,"•<"m~·e11•~1:1•~---~f~O~-~:'§LiUl_8'rff'id"r ·,, ·fit::·:1:.~'>I, ;!1-jXCQl~H-l""'Q,;s:!,;;;iiliV:J: .. --~1:c-:;~t:Jf@:Z~?l~#~!ITT~~~ilii-~;fi~!l:!~1\'#fail1)0-J:%i(,::i!(§jZfr!i'.:"'"':Ls1irr,,4JJ,iif Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to Capacity Queue Length (fl) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS rnt~km·$~mma Average Delay 372 439 453 381 53 4 0 0 73 0 15 3 0 66 0 1 38 1 847 1700 811 1700 263 127 0.00 0.26 0.09 0.22 0.20 0.03 0 0 7 0 19 3 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 22.2 34.3 A C D 0.0 1.4 22.2 34.3 C D Intersection Capacity Utilization 1.5 59.2% ICU Level of Service 2/6/2003 garrysbell- A Synchro 5 Report Page 1 SE 128th ST & 160th Avenue SE 3: Int Lane Configurations Sign Control Grade Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (veh/h) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 cont vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) IC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) pO queue free % cM capacity (veh/h) 0 0.92 0 761 4.1 2.2 100 847 ,ff. Free 0% 685 74 0.92 0.92 745 80 - ,ff. Free 0% 79 699 1 17 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 86 760 1 18 825 1338 4.1 7.5 2.2 3.5 89 82 801 102 :\f!VfJ&il~I Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to Capacity Queue Length (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Average Delay 372 0 0 847 0.00 0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 2/6/2003 garrysbell- 453 0 80 1700 0.27 0 0.0 466 86 0 801 0.11 9 3.0 A 1.6 1.8 61.0% 381 66 4 0 18 3 1 48 1 1700 253 116 0.22 0.26 0.04 0 26 3 0.0 24.2 37.1 C E 24.2 37.1 C E ICU Level of Service t ,t. Stop 0% 0 0.92 0 None 1717 6.5 4.0 100 79 Liberty Grove 2005 PM Peak w/Project 44 0.92 48 412 6.9 3.3 92 589 B ,t. Stop 0% 3 0 1 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 0 1 None 1352 1757 380 7.5 6.5 6.9 3.5 4.0 3.3 96 100 100 92 75 617 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 SE136th Street/160th Avenue SE 3: Int f Lane Configurations V Sign Control Stop Grade 0% Volume (veh/h) 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 1 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol IC, single (s) IC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) pO queue free % cM capacity (veh/h) Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to Capacity Queue Length (ft) Control Delay ( s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Average Delay None 114 6.4 3.5 100 877 3 1 2 989 0.00 0 8.7 A 8.7 A Intersection Capacity Utilization 2/6/2003 garrysbell- 2 0.92 2 21 6.2 3.3 100 1056 23 0 3 1700 0.01 0 0.0 0.0 t !' 'I!NS];jj'l'fil . f. Free 0% 18 3 0.92 0.92 20 3 83 10 0 1592 0.01 0 0.9 A 0.9 0.9 \. 9 0.92 10 23 4.1 2.2 99 1592 + .f Free 0% 67 0.92 73 14.6% ICU Level of Service A Liberty Grove 2003 PM Peak Hour Synchro 5 Report Page 1 SE136th StreeV160th Avenue SE 3: Int --t Liberty Grove 2005 PM Peak w/o Project + ~m~:1:1J:'J:;J!lif'i'i:i'ffili!1JJ~t:sl!!:1r~!E8'Ji:':m1;ai:1::::iwsn,1iww:rr:iws1,fi1111f.ll!lilf::Ns~:mNsR1'1Jt~l![!JSS~m1iisaa Lane Configurations 4+ Sign Control Stop Grade 0% Volume (veh/h) 6 0 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 7 0 3 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 205 202 108 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 cont vol tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 IC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 pO queue free % 99 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 737 680 946 lli~~iieit '.!~ii, :n',1~,i~1Eaij1Jmijl\fS:11ll hlill Volume Total 10 Volume Left 7 Volume Right 3 cSH 796 Volume to Capacity 0.01 Queue Length (ft) 1 Control Delay (s) 9.6 Lane LOS A Approach Delay (s) 9.6 Approach LOS A Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization 2/6/2003 garrysbell- 8 3 5 920 0.01 1 8.9 A 8.9 A 51 21 4 1474 0.01 1 3.1 A 3.1 2.1 17.5% 4+ Stop 0% 1 0 2 14 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.68 3 0 5 21 None 203 206 29 115 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 100 100 99 99 741 676 1046 1474 126 11 13 1582 0.01 1 0.7 A 0.7 ICU Level of Service 4+ Free 0% 18 3 0.68 0.68 26 4 A 4+ Free 0% 9 83 11 0.82 0.82 0.82 11 101 13 31 4.1 2.2 99 1582 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 SE136th Street/160th Avenue SE 3: Int f -t Liberty Grove 2005 PM Peak w/Project ~iili;~i;;~il'i!;1ililil!Jlilalfili!!ll!Sl!!!!l~SA~i!~S!!!lliWS11iB~WSBJ!ljfil'fllll~~N$]jili!llf-lSS!l!1!1!1S$L':'!if$81:!!'lf:l$8A Lane Configurations Sign Control Grade Volume (veh/h) 6 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 7 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (Ills) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 255 vC1, stage 1 cont vol vC2, stage 2 cont vol IC, single (s) 7.1 IC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 3.5 pO queue free % 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 677 Volume Total 10 Volume Left 7 Volume Right 3 cSH 744 Volume to Capacity 0.01 Queue Length (ft) 1 Control Delay ( s) 9.9 Lane LOS A Approach Delay ( s) 9.9 Approach LOS A Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization 2/6/2003 garrysbell- 4> Stop 0% 0 3 0.92 0.92 0 3 None 248 126 6.5 6.2 4.0 3.3 100 100 638 924 13 71 3 26 8 4 841 1452 0.02 0.02 1 1 9.3 2.9 A A 9.3 2.9 A 2.2 18.9% 4> Stop 0% 1 1 3 18 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.68 3 3 8 26 None 249 252 42 133 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 100 100 99 98 688 634 1029 1452 145 12 13 1564 0.01 1 0.7 A 0.7 ICU Level of Service 4> Free 0% 27 3 0.68 0.68 40 4 A 4> Free 0% 10 98 11 0.82 0.82 0.82 12 120 13 44 4.1 2.2 99 1564 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 North Site Access/160th Avenue SE 3: Int .,.> "), Lane Configurations Sign Control Grade 0% Volume (veh/h) 7 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 8 1 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 182 137 vC1 , stage 1 cont vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol IC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 IC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 3.5 3.3 pO queue free % 99 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 804 912 Qi~e\11ifll3&1r'"lt:;IT'0~~0''R'i ;, '', . 19L /ii1!:'t;;1;Yiit "Sl:J':i Volume Total 9 40 Volume Left 8 6 Volume Right 1 0 cSH 816 1441 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.00 Queue Length (ft) 1 0 Control Delay (s) 9.5 1.1 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay (s) 9.5 1.1 Approach LOS A Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization 2/6/2003 garrysbell- "' 5 0.90 6 142 4.1 2.2 100 1441 142 0 11 1700 0.08 0 0.0 0.0 0.7 17.6% t + +t lo Free Free 0% 0% 31 118 10 0.90 0.90 0.90 34 131 11 ICU Level of Service liberty Grove 2005 PM Peak w/Project A Synchro 5 Report Page 1 South Site Access/160th Avenue SE 3: Int f t Liberty Grove 2005 PM Peak w/Project M~m•~:r::~1mffi~j~~~{;11~~~•~1111wsEfm111112~0;r-1t1~:;Naes1rr~wsm1~~~81ffl&l!t&101~~w~:!l!~1911~;;~0~~111~:~(~~111r~:~1;~~~0t:1mrr;w:-:~s~~nrnm V Stop Lane Configurations Sign Control Grade Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (veh/h) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (fVs) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume vC1 , stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) pO queue free % cM capacity (veh/h) Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to Capacity Queue Length (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS rt1tera~ll"Sl!ffim1 · Average Delay 0% 2 0.90 2 None 177 6.4 3.5 100 804 11 2 9 968 0.01 1 8.8 A 8.8 A Intersection Capacity Utilization 2/6/2003 garrysbell- 8 0.90 9 48 6.2 3.3 99 1020 52 0 8 1700 0.03 0 0.0 0.0 f+ Free 0% 40 0.90 44 113 16 0 1554 0.01 1 1.1 A 1.1 1.2 16.9% 7 0.90 8 14 0.90 16 52 4.1 2.2 99 1554 4' Free 0% 88 0.90 98 ICU Level of Service A Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: SE 128TH ST & 156TH AVE SE Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) Peak-hour factor. PHF Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Tum Type - tt. 1900 3.0 0.95 0.94 1.00 3339 1.00 3339 635 0.90 706 1135 Protected Phases 4 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 22.3 Effective Green, g (s) 23.3 Actuated giC Ratio 0.36 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1197 vis Ratio Prot c0.34 vis Ratio Perm vie Ratio 0.95 Uniform Delay, d1 20.3 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 15.1 Delay (s) 35.4 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) 35.4 Approach LOS D HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length ( s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 2/6i2003 garrysbell- 1900 386 0.90 429 0 f 'I 1900 3.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.15 283 312 0.90 347 347 pm+pt 3 8 37.7 38.7 0.60 4.0 3.0 452 c0.15 0.31 0.77 13.5 1.00 7.7 21.1 C 25.0 0.69 65.0 72.9% - tt 'I .,, 1900 1900 1900 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 3539 1770 1583 1.00 0.95 1.00 3539 1770 1583 399 170 102 0.90 0.90 0.90 443 189 113 443 189 113 Prot 8 2 2 37.7 19.3 19.3 38.7 20.3 20.3 0.60 0.31 0.31 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2107 553 494 0.13 c0.11 0.07 0.21 0.34 0.23 6.1 17.2 16.6 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.1 1.7 1.1 6.1 18.9 17.6 A B B 12.7 18.4 B B HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service C 9.0 C Liberty Grove 2003 PM Peak Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: SE 128TH ST & 156TH AVE SE --Liberty Grove 2005 wlo Proiect Mq11enjei:\t.··r~111-•·;·• :;,:~!!~ltEBJl}n]jifSFi:t~lil!!l~TmrRBl31'.~5f:J£H!ff@!~'.ft1J'.?'{~:r;,:;::~,:r1r:~~i;~v:,::;:;1:,:1J'fll)ll:l:lijiJl\1HF,fii;!;;:l'H}l1Kfi~:1 Lane Configurations tt- Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 Frt 0.94 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3334 Flt Permitted 1.00 Said. Flow (perm) 3334 Volume (vph) 693 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 770 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1254 Tum Type Protected Phases 4 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 23.3 Effective Green, g (s) 24.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1246 vis Ratio Prot c0.38 vis Ratio Perm vie Ratio 1.01 Uniform Delay, d1 20.3 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 27.1 Delay (s) 47.4 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) 47.4 Approach LOS D HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length {s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 2/612003 garrysbell- 1900 436 0.90 484 0 "i 1900 3.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.15 273 323 0.90 359 359 pm+pt 3 8 38.7 39.7 0.61 4.0 3.0 452 c0.15 0.33 0.79 14.6 1.00 9.3 23.9 C 31.8 0.78 65.0 80.4% tt "i .,, 1900 1900 1900 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 3539 1770 1583 1.00 0.95 1.00 3539 1770 1583 434 222 107 0.90 0.90 0.90 482 247 119 482 247 119 Prot 8 2 2 38.7 18.3 18.3 39.7 19.3 19.3 0.61 0.30 0.30 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2162 526 470 0.14 c0.14 0.08 0.22 0.47 0.25 5.7 18.7 17.4 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.1 3.0 1.3 5.8 21.7 18.7 A C B 13.5 20.7 B C HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time ( s) ICU Level of Service C 9.0 D Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: SE 128TH ST & 156TH AVE SE Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Said. Flow (pro!) Flt Permitted Said. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases tf. 1900 3.0 0.95 0.94 1.00 3337 1.00 3337 706 0.90 784 1268 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 23.5 Effective Green, g (s) 24.5 Actuated giC Ratio 0.38 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1258 vis Ratio Pro! c0.38 vis Ratio Perm vie Ratio 1.01 Uniform Delay, d1 20.2 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 27.3 Delay (s) 47.6 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) 47.6 Approach LOS D 1900 436 0.90 484 0 "'i 1900 3.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.15 271 323 0.90 359 359 pm+pt 3 8 38.9 39.9 0.61 4.0 3.0 452 c0.15 0.34 0.79 14.7 1.00 9.3 24.0 C - tt 1900 3.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1.00 3539 437 0.90 486 486 8 38.9 39.9 0.61 4.0 3.0 2172 0.14 0.22 5.6 1.00 0.1 5.7 A 13.4 B "'i 1900 3.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 227 0.90 252 252 2 18.1 19.1 0.29 4.0 3.0 520 c0.14 0.48 18.9 1.00 3.2 22.1 C 21.1 C .,, 1900 3.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1583 1.00 1583 107 0.90 119 119 Pro! 2 18.1 19.1 0.29 4.0 3.0 465 0.08 0.26 17.5 1.00 1.3 18.9 B Liberty Grove 2005 wiProject 1nte~iJSummary~1:i:1' 1mi1i1E~1;mm111m1~11m;m:rn:!'1::~:1;;::1rnmIJ11mm1mti~~111m:m11~~~~~~f~~m!1mi~1K1wm~!~lffl!ffi!llllilJjl~m~~~:;1i~i~RF~~:E::"·--.--" HCM Average Control Delay 32.0 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 65.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.1 % c Critical Lane Group 2/6i2003 garrysbell- Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 9.0 D Synchro 5 Report Page 1 ---Original Message----- From: Scanlon, Jodi [maitto:Jodi.Scanlon@METROKC.GOV] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 9:09 AM To; ·garyn@gsassoc-inc.com' Subject: Collision Report Request Sir, Here is your accident report that you requested. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. The location 160th Ave Se & Se 128th St has no accidents associated with it in my database. Thanks, Jodi Scanlon (206)263-6111 01/:)1/199? -11/31/2001 156th Ave Se & Se 128th St TYi'[ DIST,\}~ :7rrJ".:ET 1 4 99-G7.>96? G1/11/1')7) 13 . ...D lujwy A,,,._ 0 ~ 99-6'7?,i.·iU W/ 1.;./i~99 I3,W Pu1-11::1t,· D:.u,lat',t' 0 ., .... , ... ::;t.:::%!"11~1' 99-6'3:;..f73 D3/D:./19';',) 1::,.:;:, L,j,uy .A,.,._ v <'t' ·" ....... ,, <' ..... ...... , .. v,,,.,, ;Ji'.;...::,s~:.:,,:; J.i/1.;/2.0u.:. W,:V Iu1U1y ;;_,._,._ ::;:t; $!:'.: 1::0~·: ! ~T 0 00-39D~:. [;:',/()'',' /::00;'; ;;;,.;.B Fmpc:•iy D,.,,~c 0 SI: 11GT!! ST 0 4 OC-B",,;J'7S::; G4/2ll,'2,X10 16.JD F,v,.ot·..ly Diu,~~o St. 1::r.Tl ! ST 00..:,7.::,.;:.c. c;::,'1.;./.:0DC 21.30 ;: .. JWJ A,._ .... ....... •"<>'T'"<'<"T" ->LI 1"'-VJ. • • J.I C G1-G09::; Ui,'Za/:.:.v; Ht4u P,upc-i.y D.u,~.., 0 !;J:: 1:::~rn: ~T Suuwuig R:.uu.11,g L:C}fflNC W.),",.1) COLLlSlON "'"' ... . ... LIL.J UU<.: U LUUI UUC HLll.lf;;U' 0 0 ~· . . . ,. ' . V(.'.U ~=~ ·~ ~IU/ 0 0 0 C 0 " l.':bTTlAVC ;::;e,TilAVt 1~TE.AVTI 1 ,._...,.., T < ~r,--, ,Ju,ri..n.,µ .:u.:. 1:;c.TrIAVI: - 4 01-16-1558 05/::!1/2001 12:37 Pcoperty D::nmige 0 .'\Vt.SE SJ~ 12tf1H.ST 4 SE 01-145670 12/07/200] 16:05 lnjury Ace SE 128TH ST 01/01/1999" 12/31/2001 160th Ave Se & Se 128th St Sorted by <DATE;TIME;ACCr.> 0 Clear ot Ooudy Daylight Diy SD both it.r!l.tght ,~11e stop RE () 156'11-f Cle.i.r or Ooudf Daylight Dr,· OD one lt tutn one stz:aight 0 156THAVE o.~ ~UAl.)l{A..N'l' CASt'~ 1l) DA'l'C TlM.£ ACC. SEVt:Rfl'Y P.t':D AGt: Wt:AT!-urn. UGH'llNG ~!2f Ps KOADCOLLISJ0N'1..,, vT TYPE DIST AN STREE.T 1 STREET 2 4 99-099907 03/28/1999 20:25 Injtuy Ace AVC SE SE 128TH ST • SE 99-676368 05/22/1999 14:10 lojuty Ace SE I2BTH sr 0 0 4 SE 99-103329 08/18/1999 17:50 Property D.lllTlllW 0 SE 128TH ST 4 SE 4 SE 99"689302 10/28/1999 12:39 lnjw:y Ace SE 128TH ST 99-688460 11/22/1999 16:40 Jpjury Ace SE 128TB ST 0 0 4 00-103337 01/04/20009:45 lniwyAcc 0 SE SF.. 128TH ST 4 00-)03338 01/03/2(00 17;.,1,0 Property Dllrllage 0 AYE SE SE 128"t'H S1' 4 01-145879 02/25/2001 11:00 Injwy Ace 0 SE 128TH ST 4 01-14548304/23/200117:45Property~O 128TH ST 160TH A'VE SE 4 01 1456.'H 04/25/2001 17:35 lnjwy ..Ace 0 SE SE 12ffTH 5'!' 4 01-3123CX:. J2/05/200120~20InjuryAce 0 SE 12tffH S'I' dear or Ooudy Dam. strrct light Dxy SD both s~ght both moving SS 0 160TH Clear or Cloudy Daylight Dry SD both straight one stop RE 0 160THAVE Oear or Ooudy Daybght 0 161JTH AVE Snowing Daylight Wet OD one lt tum one straight 0 160THAVE Raimng Daik s~t light Wet SD both straight one stop RE 0 16CfrHAVE Daylight Dry OD one lt lum one stoi.ight O 160TH A VE Oear o.r Cloudy Daylight Dl)' SD both suaight one stop RE O 160TH CJea.r O! doudy Daylight D.ty Right ..u1gle 0 160TJ-l A VE SE Oe.a.r or Ooudy Daylight Dty SD both stmight one str~p RE O SE Oe.u 01 Goudy Duyiight Dry SDhothsttaightone,topRE O I60THAVE Dad. street light Wet Right angle 0 160-fJIAVESE S.J IL£ M ~ ft;l[ • • • • • • • • • • • TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS for PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LIBERTY GROVE ADDENDUM #1 - r:~;,;;;-;:---:=--- RESPONSE TO PLAT SCREENING I 1 ~\lf SI ON] July 24, 2003 Prepared By: Gary A. Norris, P.E . DN Traffic Consultants POBox547 Preston, Washington 98050-0547 Client: Wayne Jones Lakeridge Development Company PO Box 146 Renton, Washington 98057 l='f I r= ·"OPY rl .. L.~ l-, l,.,,i' · SEP ~1 '3 2°,·0 ., , .u,J.1 Exhibit No . ...:.\ ..,_9-=----~~~~d ':.z:>g<¥" King County Hearing Examiner MAIN FILE COP "( '1-;) • • • • • • • • • • Traffic impact Analysis Addendum #/ Liberty Grove The following report was prepared as an addendum to the Traffic Impact Analysis for the Preliminary Plat of Liberty Grove dated February 7, 2003. The purpose of the addendum is to provide a response to the traffic related issues identified in the Plat Screening Transmittal. The Plat Screening Transmittal letter identified 6 items for further evaluation which include: Sa. Sb. Sc. Sd. Se. An AM peak hour analysis of the intersections analyzed in the TIA submitted with the plat application. An alternatives analysis that addresses the Hearing Examiner's decision for the plat ofEvendell, specifically, the denial of the rezone request (and, reduction of the permitted number of lots to 46), together with elimination of the requirement of off-site construction of the SE 136th Street (IS6th Avenue to IS 8th Avenue SE) connection. Updated existing conditions (2003) levels-of-service (Page 7, Table I). Please retain the 2001 information (unless "2001" is merely a typographical error) to address previous testimony related to the reductions in regional trip activity resulting from local market conditions. The 26% distribution south along 160th Avenue SE may be excessive under a "with SE 136th Street" scenario. The travel path to the intersection of 142°d Place SE/SE 156th is nearly 33% further along that travel path as compared to that using an extended SE 136th Street. Perform a travel time analysis to compare an actual morning peak hour travel time along the 160th Avenue to SE 144th Street to SE 156th Street trip versus a theoretical SE 136th Street to 156th Avenue SE, with appropriate delays factored into the westbound left turn to proceed southbound on 1S6th Avenue SE. The newly constructed west leg of SE 136th Avenue SE may serve as a reasonably accurate source of data on the delays required to complete a left turn across 1S6th Avenue SE. Other single lane approach "STOP" controlled intersections along the portion of IS6th Avenue SE, between SE 128 111 and SE 142"d Place . Sf. Updated traffic accident history (that is, include 2002). The process, findings and conclusions of the additional traffic analysis are discussed below. Each issue is identified in italics with the response stated below . 5a. An AM peak hour analysis of the intersections analyzed in the TIA submitted with the plat application. An AM peak hour analysis of the following intersections was conducted: DN Traffic Consultants Pagel • • • • • • • • • • Traffic Impact Analysis Addendum #1 Liherty Grove • SE 136tll Street/160'h Avenue SE • SE 128t11 Street/160'h Avenue SE • SE 128th Street/I 56tll Avenue SE • North Site Access/160th Avenue SE • South Site Access/l 60t11 A venue SE The analysis includes a level of service evaluation at the intersections for the 2003 existing, 2005 background and 2005 with project conditions. Existing AM peak hour traffic volumes were obtained from AM peak hour turning movement counts collected by this consultant during the month of July 2003. The 2005 background volumes were obtained by factoring the existing volumes by 1.0 percent per year for consistency with the original traffic analysis and adding pipeline traffic volumes. AM peak hour pipeline traffic volumes were obtained by factoring the PM peak hour pipeline volumes documented in the February 7, 2003 report, by 0.73, the ratio of AM peak trip generation to PM peak trip generation for single family developments. The intersection turning movements were then adjusted to reflect a reverse orientation as would be expected between AM and PM peak hour trip making for single family developments. This approach is acceptable as all pipeline developments in this area are single famill" It also reflects a "worst case" scenario, in terms of impact to the SE l28t11 Street/160 Avenue SE intersection, as the PM peak distribution to the north (74 percent) is higher than that reflected in the AM peak hour turning movement counts (63 percent). The 2005 with project AM peak hour turning movement volumes were obtained by adding project generated trips to the 2005 background volumes. Traffic distribution for the AM peak trips was assumed to be the same as the PM peak hour. Therefore, project generated AM peak trips were assigned in the same manner as the AM pipeline trips, again representing a "worst case" scenario. A summary of the AM peak hour turning movement volumes at the analysis intersections for the alternative analysis scenarios is presented in the Appendix. Level of service (LOS) for the AM conditions was calculated using Synchro 5.0. The results of the LOS analysis are presented in Table I. DN Traffic Consultants Page2 • • • • • • • • • • • Traffic Impact Analysis Addendum #I Liberty Grove Table I. AM Peak Hour Level of Service 2003 2005 2005 LOS Intersection Traffic Control Existing Without Project With Project Standard N Site Acc/160'' Ave SE Eastbound' One-Way Stop n/a n/a A(8.8) E S Site Acc/160th Ave SE Westbound1 One-Way Stop n/a n/a A(8.8) E SE 128'" St/160'" Ave SE Northbound1 Two-Way Stop C(22.l) C(23.9) D(27.7) E SE 136'" St/160'" Ave SE Westbound' One-Way Stop A(8.6) E Eastbound1 Two-Way Stop2 A(8.9) A(9.0) SE 128'" St/156"' Ave SE Overall Signal B(l4.2) 8(18.8) B(19.0) E (xx)-seconds of delay per vehicle. I -Level of service for the movement with the highest delay is shown . 2 -SE 136"' Street will no longer be constructed as part of the Evendell proposal based on the Hearing Examiners decision. However, it is anticipated that this connection will be made at some point in the future and therefore was considered as part of the AM analysis. As shown in Table 1, all of the analysis intersections are estimated to operate at an acceptable level of service for all analysis conditions. Comparing the results of the AM peak hour analysis to the PM peak hour level of service at the same intersections indicates the PM peak hour represents the ''worst case" analysis. The PM peak hour vehicular delay at each of the analysis intersections is higher than the AM peak hour vehicular delay at the same intersection. (See February 7 2003, TIA, Table 6, page 12) . Sb. An alternatives analysis that addresses the Hearing Examiner's decision for the plat of Evendell, specifically, the denial of the rezone request (and, reduction of the permitted number of lots to 46), together with elimination of the requirement of off-site construction of the SE 136°' Street (J 56'h Avenue to 158'1' Avenue SE) connection. Traffic volumes for the requested alternatives analysis were assumed to be the same PM peak hour traffic volumes used in the initial traffic impact analysis with the following adjustments: !) 2) Reduction in the number of PM peak hour trips generated by Evendell from 76 to 46 to reflect the reduction in the number oflots associated with Evendell from 75 to 46. Reassignment of existing, pipeline, and project trips to reflect the elimination of the SE 136th Street connection between 156th Avenue SE and 160th Avenue SE. The reassiinment was accomplished by reassigning all trips through the SE l 28'h Street/160 Avenue SE intersection as opposed to the SE 136th Street/156th Avenue SE intersection as currently presented in the initial TIA. None of the trips were reassigned to 160th Avenue SE south of SE 136th Street as the proposed connection was not anticipated to impact traffic assignment on 160th Avenue SE south of the 136111 Street intersection. DN Traffic Consultants Page3 • • • • • • • • • • • Traffic Impact Analysis Addendum #I Liberty Grove The resulting PM peak hour volumes associated with the trip generation and traffic assignment adjustments discussed above are presented in the Appendix . Level of service (LOS) for the alternatives analysis was calculated using Synchro 5.0. The results of the LOS analysis are presented in Table 2. Table 2. PM Peak Hour Level of Service With 46 Lot Evendell and No SE 136 .. Street 2003 2005 2005 2005 Intersection Traffic Control Existing W/out Project With Project w/SE 136 .. 2 N Site Acc/160" Ave SE Eastbound 1 One-Way Stop n/a n/a A(9.6) A(9.5) S Site Ace/ 160" Ave SE Westbound' One-Way Stop n/a n/a A(8.8) A(8.8) SE 128" St/160" Ave SE Southbound 1 Two-Way Stop D(27.4) E(37.I) Northbound 1 Two-Way Stop E(36.5) E(47.9) C(24.2) SE 136" St/ 160" Ave SE Westbound1 One-Way Stop A(8.7) A(8.8) A(8.8) Eastbound' Two-Way Stop A(9.9) SE 128" St/156" Ave SE Signal Overall C(25.0) C(28.3) C(28.7) C(32.0) (xx) -seconds of delay per vehicle. I -Level of service for the movement with the highest delay is shown. 2 -Assumes construction of SE 136th Street from 160th Avenue SE to 156th Avenue SE and development of the 75 lot Evendell proposal as presented in the February 7, 2003 traffic impact analysis. As shown in Table 2, all intersections operate at or above the acceptable level of service (LOS E). Comparing the results to the with SE 13611, Street/75 lot Evendell scenario, the LOS is virtually unchanged at the site access and SE 13611, Street intersections with 16011, Avenue SE; the average vehicle delay at the SE 1281h Street/16011, Avenue SE intersection increases by 10 seconds and the movement with the highest delay shifts from the southbound direction to the northbound direction, (the LOS in the northbound direction goes from C to E with an increase of23 seconds in average delay); and the average vehicular delay at the SE 1281h Street/15611, Avenue SE intersection actually decreases by 3 seconds. 5c . Updated existing conditions (2003) levels-of-service (Page 7, Table 1). Please retain the 2001 information (unless "2001" is merely a typographical error) to address previous testimony related to the reductions in regional trip activity resultingfrom local market conditions. Please note the levels of service presented in Table 1, Page 7 is actually a 2003 existing condition LOS not 2001. It is as suggested "merely a typographical error". Table 1 is restated below in the corrected form. DN Traffic Consultants Page4 • • • • • • • • • • • Traffic Impact Analysis Addendum#/ Table l(From 2-7-03 TIA). Intersection SE 128th St/160th Ave SE Southbound' SE 136th St/160th Ave SE Westbound' SE 128th St/156th Ave SE 2003 PM Peak Hour Level of Service Traffic Control Two-Way Stop One-Way Stop 2003 Existing 0(27.4) A(8.7) Overall Signal C(25.0) (xx) -seconds of delay per vehicle. I -Level of service for the movement with the highest delay is shown. Liberty Grove LOS Standard E E E 5d The 26% distribution south along !6dh Avenue SE may be excessive under a "with SE 136th Street" scenario. The travel path to the intersection of 142"d Place SEISE 1561h is nearly 33% further along that travel path as compared to that using an extended SE 13rl' Street. There are several factors that lead to a particular traffic distribution including trip orientation, travel time, stops along the way, and desirability of route. The 26 percent distribution was based on existing traffic assignment along the 160th Avenue SE corridor as determined from 2003 PM peak hour turning movement counts. This issues are explored in greater depth in item 5e. 5e. Pe,form a travel time analysis to compare an actual morning peak hour travel time along the J6rJh Avenue to SE J44'h Street to SE 156'h Street trip versus a theoretical SE J 36'h Street to l 56'h Avenue SE, with appropriate delays factored into the westbound left turn to proceed southbound on 156th Avenue SE. The newly constructed west leg of SE 136th Avenue SE may serve as a reasonably accurate source of data on the delays required to complete a left turn across 15 rl' Avenue SE. Other single lane approach "STOP" controlled intersections along the portion of 1561h Avenue SE, between SE 128'h and SE J 4r Place . Although the statement requested a "morning peak hour travel time" analysis, it was assumed the motivation for the request came from the comment 5d which indicated the 26 percent distribution south along 160th Avenue SE might be excessive under the "with SE 136th Street" scenario. Since the 26 percent distribution was applied to the PM peak hour analysis, a PM peak hour travel time analysis was conducted. The travel time analysis was conducted in the study area to evaluate the propensity to use the alternative routes, i.e. 160th Ave SE/SE 144th St/156th Ave SE to the 156th Ave SE/142nd Pl intersection versus the SE 136th St/156th Ave SE route. The travel time analysis was conducted on Wednesday afternoon July 23, 2003 between 4:30 PM and 5:30 PM. The study involved three runs in each direction on each route. Travel time recorded on the 160th Avenue SE route was consistent in each direction at an average of 2.03 minutes. For the 156th Avenue SE route, there was a 10 second difference in the average travel time between the north bound and south bound runs. The northbound run averaged 46 seconds whereas the south bound run averaged 56 seconds. This was a result of the additional delay created by the southbound platoon coming from the signal DN Traj]ic Consultants Page5 • • • • • • • • • • • Traffic Impact Analysis Addendum #/ Liberty Grove on 156th Avenue SE at SE 128th Street. The additional delay occurred at the stop sign at the 142nd Place intersection . In addition to the travel time runs, an analysis of the vehicular delay associated with vehicles waiting to enter the southbound flow. To estimate the delay, three left turn maneuvers were made from the side streets along 156th Avenue SE to 156th Avenue. Because of the extensive platoon of vehicles coming from the signal at 160th Avenue SE, the average vehicular delay was 26. 7 seconds with the measured delay for each attempt ranging from 7 seconds to 38 seconds. A two vehicle queue was also observed on one of the dead end side streets. The travel time across a constructed SE 136th Street was estimated using the distance and assumed travel speed consistent with a posted speed limit of25 mph. The results of this calculation yielded a travel time of35.9 seconds. Adding the various travel time elements associated with traffic from the 160th Avenue SE corridor using SE 136th Street and 156th Avenue for trips bound to the south yielded a travel time ofl.88 minutes (51 seconds+ 26.7 seconds+ 35.9 seconds= 1.88 minutes) for the SE 136th Street/156th Avenue SE route compared to 2.03 minutes for the 160th Ave SE/14411, Ave SE/156th Ave SE route. The results of the travel time analysis indicates a slight travel time advantage (approximately 7 percent) for the SE 136th Street/15611, Avenue SE route. However, with the proposed change in functional classification and increased volumes for the 156th Avenue SE corridor the travel time difference could swing in favor of the 160th Avenue SE route . Another factor in the trip assignment issue is the orientation of the traffic. To estimate this factor, a 10 minute turning movement count was conducted at the 160th Avenue SE/SE 144th Street intersection during the same peak hour as the travel time analysis. The purpose of the count was to determine the orientation of 160th Avenue SE traffic at the SE 144th Street intersection. The result of the traffic count indicated that 20 percent of the traffic was oriented to/from the west, 73 percent to the east, and 7 percent to the south. The conclusion is that the overwhelming majority of the traffic to and from the south on 160th Avenue SE is not destined to the 156th Avenue SE/142nd Place intersection. Furthermore, the percentage of trips oriented to the east could be significantly higher when school begins as Liberty High School is located east of 160th Avenue SE and would be accessed using SE 144th Street. The conclusion of the analysis is that with the opening of SE 136th Street there is not likely to be an extensive redistribution of the 160th Avenue SE traffic oriented to the south to the 156th Avenue SE corridor. Therefore, the 26 percent distribution to the south is a reasonable representation of trip distribution with or without SE 136th Street. This percentage was also applied to the AM peak hour analysis which represents a ''worst case" scenario AM peak hour scenario at the SE 128th Street/16011, Avenue SE intersection . DN Traffic Consultants Page6 • • • • • • • • • • • Traffic Impact Analysis Addendum #I Liberty Grove 5f Updated traffic accident history (that is, include 2002). Additional traffic accident data was obtained from King County Traffic Engineering to reflect 2002 accident records. This information is presented in Table 3 below, along with previous accident information. Number of Accidents Total Acc. Avg. Intersection 1999 2000 2001 2002 Ace Rate Rate SE 128th St/ 156th Ave SE 4 6 3 4 17 0.58 0.90 SE 128"' St/160"' Ave SE 5 2 4 0 11 0.52 1.30 SE 136th St/ 160th Ave SE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.90 1) -Accident rate per milhon entermg vehicles 2)-Average accident rate for type of intersection per WSDOT. According to King County staff; there was an additional 4 accidents at the SE 128th Street/156th Avenue SE intersection and no additional accidents at the SE 128th Street/l 60th Avenue SE and SE 136th Street/160th Avenue SE intersections. The average accident rate with the additional data has increased at the SE 128th Street/156th Avenue SE from 0.53 to 0.58 and decreased at the SE 128th Street/160th Avenue SE intersection from 0.56 to 0.52. Interestingly enough, there were no accidents at the SE 128th Street/160th Avenue SE intersection during the 2002 time period. Conclusions Based on the analysis presented above in response to the Plat Screening issues, the proposed Plat of Liberty Grove will not have a significant impact on the surrounding transportation network. This is based on the following: • The AM peak hour level of service at the analysis intersections is within the acceptable range. Furthermore, the average vehicular delay is lower and the associated level of service higher than the PM peak hour LOS at the same intersections. • Without the construction of SE 136th Street and reduction in the number oflots to the Evendell plat, the PM peak hour LOS remains at an acceptable level at all intersections. Although the average delay increases by 10 seconds at the SE 128th Street/160th Avenue SE intersection, the LOS remains the same (LOSE). The average delay at the SE 128th Street/156th Avenue SE intersection actually decreases by 3 seconds. • The average accident rate at the SE 128th Street/160th Avenue SE intersection improved with the addition of the 2002 accident data Therefore, it is recommended that the Preliminary Plat of Liberty Grove be approved from the traffic impact standpoint . DN Traffic Consultants Page 7 • Traffic Impact Analysis Addendum#/ liberty Grove • • TECHNICAL APPENDIX FOR • PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LIBERTY GROVE • • • • • • DN TrafF,c Consultants • • Liberty Grove SE 128th Street/156th Ave SE • AM PEAK HOUR 00 • ~ .. " a. ~ § .c I Cl u " ~ C) ~ i.l "' 11 ·e- Q_ ~ ~ C. a: 0 (.) C) " ;;z ~ 0 " ·e- Q_ " .!: 8. a: " 0 c " a:: 0 " "!! Q_ '5 0 .c ~ 3': ~ " > & ~ .2l ::J 11 ·e Q_ £ ~ ~ .li u .. U- ~ " 0 I ~ .. " a. 3l =, "' ]! u 2 I- "E " ~ " a. • EBLT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 238 5 4 19 266 2 268 0.93 3.3 EBRT 96 2 22 5 125 4 129 WBLT 51 1 1 0 53 0 53 WBT 511 10 24 9 5&) 9 559 0.99 3.7 • WBRT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBLT 378 8 27 2 427 0 427 NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.91 2.8 NBRT 364 7 4 0 375 0 375 • SBLT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBRT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1638 33 82 35 1796 15 1811 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2003 Existing AM Peak SE 128th Street/156th Avenue SE 7/23/2003 -t D~'""'''4\Gl!~~,-···· ·-w············,m•1m.&~~11,· ' ····n~,···uA¥i¥1:m!er ¥t!ii91'Skili ····i,l'i,ni!*;·c,····· ''"'8>-i ···· ,.,~~~~""l91~:1f&Ali~~Ji1r8~ilill/!l,~~~ffi!l!ss!!t~i,iif~i~bo0,~,ili,,1,~'1'!!is!EiliI~;tl\'~+!~ Lane Configurations t't> t't> 'i 7' l<l!!alFlow,{vpl;ipl)', 'l~OOF ]~®; .1900 1900 1900 rnoo t9QQ 19po 1900 1900 1900 .1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 LameLJ!iltFa<:t!!in' ' t ,,m95·, 0;95 · '• " ::;--· ,f ,•)c" •,c, ,.: ,•,. ,', :" ' I Ml'.;' "''' Frt 0.96 fiit 1,!joll'l~l!c!r.lJ;/ttzi•, Satd. Flow (prot) 1 Flf Rarmtlteaz r ' 0.90 ;;,,•o,S'$' 7'' Satd. Flow (perm) 3174 1770 ~~iilifu'ilii(\('ptj) ' '' ' i'tl:'i': 238 . 96 , .. ' 5.1 ' ,511 o 11~fil ' P, 364 ';· o Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 t~ilila~t~t1 >mrnm::m1rn, 1•Immmmri:lili1t11:•1~~!ai:)}~1:~;ti1,' fa •:;;:~~ .mm•.~~ ::,rm;;::fo1Qnm1lf~1,1.':1 ••l:':i: p!§fill}"?9S:),. ,~i ;;ti, .. :. Lane Group Flow (vph) O 363 O O 61 O O 411 O 396 o ~11im1ai~1fil1?~!!:~i-:];;~~-~?-~J!w~:;~:r~01~z;:;1' :::1:·::;1!;<1::-:::'1WiJjrt1~!~1:mm:1u1!1t;:111~J~:tifu~~,,~m~1~i;i~!1:m;;~~:Q.LiWtom.:~: Protected Phases 4 3 8 5 l'ii~([l!it,tatJ0,Fl;l'Ja~e~': ; . \ a Actuated Green, G (s) 8!t~<1tit.,~8f~e'6fg'(§)l '·· 10.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.41 rqi~~;tr~~m11~r:mJHJ;:tJ"0 '::~">Jn11w1JJl,lfU1t1ftfi0:i{ ':-,:,:;:::::J:1:z, '\i!j :1b<Wf:flQ~: ·< Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 2' 0 0.92 . 0 0 0 0.92 0 ::1 1 111fst:w~,~!!~1o/J:mimHffil5lll:tltlJlr&;1~1#gh1m:4ij~1111*:11!rxifi-it1rr1-~ ::1;1m0~1JMu~1:1111t 0.23 1.00 20.1 Baseline GARRYSBELL-ST51 0.90 1.00 29.1 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 • • • • • • • • • • • 2005 AM Peak Without Project SE 128th Street/156th Avenue SE -7/23/2003 t "'i r Lane Configurations Ideal Flo,Yy;(vphpl) Total Lost time (s) l,a11e;\,)tlbifgctc,/ tt:. 190(1; .:Jsoo: 4.0 .QJJ/;i 0.95 tt:. ;1900> 1900.> H/00 . 1 900 J\)00 1900 .1 900 1900 ;; il900 . J\)00 Frt !s!t lilf~~9!~?/h>?; : .... Satd. Flow (prot) 4.0 1.00 4.0 1.1)0 1.00 4.0 · 1:00· 0.85 · i1ii;;~i!!J.d: ·:. \ .]j~Q(!%); ·~!.;g;;~.>0.9'5"""'• ;;;; · tl'.0() 3369 3524 1583 1crtf ewJ111~1t · · ·; :;tioo ... :!l:J:i.rr ·· 1J>d;t ;•·-. Satd. Flow (perm) \lolHitl~('1:!llj} i ·· · · Peak-hour factor, PHF ~~w!llm~'JW'r1 :1:·11r~ Lane Group Flow (vph) 3369 3151 1770 1583 0 2~fl: ';12$. '"· i$;3 ; 5~Qi.1 i'i()c, { 427 O.~ O.~ Q~ O.~ O.~ Q~ O.~ 1 Pi ]i!.~ili~~~llitlill~·j~'IlI . 0 425 0 0 656 0 464 0.92 0.92 0 408 . 0 0.92 0 0.92 0 0 ~ll~J~~l!itlllll!li!!tf'.fJi1!;!!!;:U~;:l :":,;;: ::im,;irrJ:;IL ;TI~·;Ef\1,Prffi~tJJif;'.!!' :;;um1i~il\liHHr1 1(l1f!~~~tWif:ff .·; }:sm11:1t:¢·~~t<JJ:fil:li;l;i ;;·~1:?:,;;: :t:11tR1!l1il\Ei Protected Phases 4 3 8 5 A~cf;fu•ti~,,a!i~~fi!S Actuated Green, G Baseline GARRYSBELL-ST51 B Synchro 5 Report Page 1 • • • • • • • • • • • 2005 AM Peak With Project SE 128th Street/156th Avenue SE 7/23/2003 --t tfillffi!DlfillllJ!ik'ill~i'i!,~-itnt:We1l!IJ&mm1t~1~e~;l,~Jl~!ll!itlllliQfilllllll!!llll!~~~~1iS11¥lll Lane Configurations tf. tf. "I '(' JdeaLFlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 9ll0 19.0:0 .1900i 1900 ·1900 .1900 :'J~00:i\19QQ 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 La1;1el..lW;if.aotor Q,;~;i ii i ·· ·· ._,.o.95 Frt 0.95 1.00 p11 f,ri?\wte<J ii i •· Satd. Flow (prot) Fif Petmftied Satd. Flow (perm) Volume;lvph) Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 3367 0.92 0.92 3524 0.89 3152 i ]'!~~itQQii 1583 .·. _53 -· 559 .i·• r o • 11gt,J•··ti.:Q;iJi!f'.: $!8.1sifitI :ox, · o _ 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 0.92 ~gj;;fri~iM>h.l~-~····· Lane Group Flow (vph) %,!lM ::;, ,;.·, o,,rn~~~~~i!;.;;1...0ll~};~~;;.t;. ·. :o ,~1 rJ:#i•o 0 431 0 0 666 0 464 0 408 0 0 0 ~rnir,~~;~11falf'.J'?t:1tth11i·'.i'. ,0c~~11:r:;;: t\1m111:i::~; ti~1mim1tPm~Rr Protected Phases 4 3 Perrtji\t~.P:has\,!S• • 8 Actuated Green, G Baseline GARRYSBELL-ST51 -"·f:tI<'ii ?;1::;~i!ll:Hm~-0stq~nmtt!·:m&m~~!?J'fu'.i~~Jzt:t,itil1m~ffi+~·· .': ~:ei!;;\S' 8 5 0.95 0.93 1.00 1.00 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 • Liberty Grove SE 136th SU160th Ave SE • AM PEAK HOUR • 3 0 I -" .. .. Q. :;; <( ~ .c i C) " C " e Ji 0 ., "' {l .. ·e- Q. .. ~ Q. 0:: 0 0 0) C "' J!! 0 .. ·e Q. .. -" .. a. 0:: C .E C .. er 1l .. e Q. s 0 ~ ~ .. e C) ~ 1! ::J 1l .. e Q. ~ ~ :s 1l .. u_ 3 0 I -" .. .. Q. "' ill " ! 0 2 >-- "E ~ .. D.. • EBLT 0 0 8 0 8 0 a EBT 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 a 0 EBRT 0 0 4 a 4 3 7 WBLT 3 0 0 a 3 0 3 • WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.47 0 WBRT 5 0 0 a 5 1 6 NBLT 0 0 2 0 10 0 10 NBT ~ 1 11 0 43 11 54 0.72 0 NBRT 1 0 0 • 0 1 0 1 SBLT 0 0 0 a 0 1 1 SBT 9 0 6 0 15 6 21 0.53 11.1 SBRT 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 57 315 0 93 23 116 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2003 Existing AM Peak SE 136th St/160th Avenue SE Baseline GARRYSBELL-ST51 7/23/2003 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 • • • • • • • • • • • 2005 AM Peak Without Project SE 136th Stl160th Avenue SE -t -7/23/2003 t ~'='-~·;i,.i •~• ••~••· .ibi .. -~--~ ·1 ~~ffllRLZllir!,i'>1'5+cti,,o,S•••w;liiiiat~illmii,i""ibj,.l1il"""'i11lJ••-11,,,:,cLv;.lliffi;,··lf&yi~'Iii&~·············· ~~~~~ra!itw•>cwii!.~~$111,i1iiii1!~~~~C<J,iffl!P~i~~~!:!lil"",i!i'~~Bl1! Lane Configurations 4> Sign Control < · · . Stop Grade 0% \/<:>)µn:,e,•(P~!Jfh) ,.; .i'.f,:1"t1$ ' "' Q;, • , Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 !il8i.'ltW.tJ2w.,r1;1~:{.;)'eHKfil' ,thi~• . .lii 1( .. dt-!i• '4 Pedestrians ~1'!-llll Y'JiqthJttH: d,t · Walking Speed (ft/s) ljti:>~jlt_,B)o¢.kage .. Right turn flare (veh) l~!'.?ij!:Jtf'~;m~ll·1illt~:1lil!Ul!i!JOOl!ID]!1h!71Ki~ftif!M~E~l;,::;;;;~i-- Median storage veh) 4> Stop, QO/o ~:, .•,o •. 0.92 0.92 ~l!i:~~nt!t~t1rriJ'it.~t~m~J1,-mmii~a11, .i1tJtiem11mmm1e: ·· ·· 92 ~1tf!o vC1, 1 cont vol Average Delay 2.7 ,1; 0.92 4> 4> •Free Free 0% QO/o 1 o. , JS 1 ":!. .. 4 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 t9,~~~llJt-•mr~f!n~mim~mri~~!tditff~?~i~:11~:1~:~1!~;1pwtLr~Y:~+toto:s~:fy~~~~~~J:llimw:~;tf.t~::i-;m!t}~~:rnm::;. -:'-'--.::;!;'.)Sim; 'Wi~~~;f~4'. Baseline GARRYSBELL-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 • • • • • • • • I • I 2005 AM Peak With Project SE 136th St/160th Avenue SE -7/23/2003 Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ 4+ 4+ Sigf]i('..:ontrol Stop $top Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% ~luihe''(v~ftlh} a ,. ·7 , 3 o 1, 1. o 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 L.i,i,\.i,,H_!<fi:(;,.c-, •; t&i .· •• h/h') • • -;,,9· ·.1.·_.•_!,•,.•• J]l!ffl'~Uf")?:,,l:f;~~;J!/Ff-E\'.'\ V8---- Pedestrians !-iJ[)El Y','.icl!h {ft). . Walking Speed (ft/s) PilfcetifBlocka: e , ... ' . ,. . g Right turn flare (veh) t-1ffil!L~J.¥~1111m1:i111 tJm · ,.. · Median veh) 923 1587 c,O:l,!)~io,;J~i!-~~1m,,~rq~!i :;;:p,o.<1..-11;, •• ,., 1 1 1 0 :'~ft~l~J~~tMf;~i~ -::: ·:,i::r~) '"'td}~i/!!iui!1C~f;l\t1t; -., -. A A A A Approach Average Delay 2.6 jJ!.l[~lllii!~~~~ty' Baseline GARRYSBELL-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 • Liberty Grove SE 128th Streel/16Dth Ave SE • AM PEAK HOUR "' • " .. " Q. ::; <( ~ .c I " .., C ~ "' " " "' Ill u .. ·e Q. -~ ,. C. ii: 0 () "' C S2 {i " ·e- Q. " C 8. ii: C 0 c .. 0:: u " ·e Q. s 0 .c ~ :s: ~ ~ " ~ .8 :::; u " ·e 0.. .c ~ ~ 0 u "' '-'- ~ 0 I " "' .. Q_ "' 31 " Ill ]l 0 2 I-c ~ " Q. • EBLT o o o o o o o EBT 599 12 4 18 633 o 633 0.89 4.8 EBRT 7 o 2 o 9 2 11 WBLT 7 o 9 o 16 7 23 WBT 506 10 6 9 531 o 531 0.88 6 • WBRT 1 o o o 1 o 1 NBLT 33 1 9 o 36 9 44 NBT o o o o o o 0 0.81 o NBRT 26 1 16 o 43 8 51 • SBLT 4 o o o 4 0 4 SBT o o o o o 0 0 0.82 o SBRT 10 o o o 10 o 10 1193 24 46 27 1282 26 1308 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2003 Existing AM Peak SE 128th St/160th Avenue SE 7/23/2003 -f +-t \. ~v1~•~1J?J-lGB-~E~ll'~ll¥ill!-"'1:P1 Lane Configurations +ff+ < +ff+ . . . f f Sign Qpntrpl Free ,,.f:r~ei.,. >· ,.. : !' · '!Stdp §tpp " G~ ~ 0% ~ ~ ~~Jf!fi!!.(ve~/h) ;Cff · §g9.,.,.,.. ::iml l(ii!'~~.ot"H:'"'''1 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.88 0.88 0.88 !{a:!/~~idth (ft) Walking Speed (fVs) Pci!~<;ElnfE3fg/:kage Right turn flare (veh) fl!ij-~p~~~Zft1h •.. Median storage veh) Ji,~i!!'!lr<itf" vijltime · .,~ ........ :liL .• ,..li!9 . ..• . ., vC1, stage 1 conf vol )lg:W~~Jc1ge 2"~orif..vol-· ;,,.,; • IC, single (s) t<ll~21is'"g·.e 's' h;J<{{fu", ''°'~ 'CL·\.,./:' IF (s) Volume Total Baseline GARRYS8ELL-ST51 4.1 4.1 2.2 2.2 337 344 295 289 73 17 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 • • • • • • • • • • • 2005 AM Peak Without Project SE 128th St/160th Avenue SE -7/23/2003 t &\=1'/~="'~~-=i!Sr~~mll'il!~i-•---"'7ilJ~~W~lillli!!l'/<~!3~liil~~&.:":-'-__ -1,ll!,~:lft!zff€~)5-----~'!!~~-y,y,~r--~'ii!llll __ ~f;t..,f,Jt¥,;>f~L-------~Ji!! Lane Configurations .ff. .ff. 4+ 4+ Sign Coi'Jtroti; ___ _ . ,f're!'l Free >f:i,1fi:i"•:i~..'.: §!9p;• . "' Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Vqlqm~J~g!)lfl) 0 10 Peak Hour Factor 0_82 0.82 LanlW1ttth («) < _ Walking Speed (ft/s) pgajentBloc~age Right turn flare (veh) ~~-iqn/ty~Ji\~'.-· !Ii•_-• ;- Median storage veh) ~J:i;~1Jnil:\,1~g1,Y.~\l.lmli\,'~7{\13~~1:~•1J11illl'lJillim11r~•,t'l{i1!1mm;• ,i11m1.P6ll!11rw~~~tl!;'l~•!ll~,llilt,11~g2r .. :,s:P? vC1, 1 cont vol Volume Total 356 366 320 303 Baseline GARRYSBELL-ST51 96 17 6.9 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 • • • • • • • • • • • 2005 AM Peak With Project SE 128th St/160th Avenue SE Volume Total Baseline GARRYSBELL-ST51 -' f - Free. 0% 0% 63q;<ti f1Ii.Ui.'~~':(~~ii.illi.N1t . .M 0.89 0.89 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.81 7.5 356 368 328 303 117 17 t 0% 0 0.81 6.5 7/23/2003 \. 0% 51 -,,_,n,;4 -,. ;1•1'11f\l£/: tdP 0.81 0.82 0.82 0.82 6.9 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 • Liberty Grove North Site Access/160th Avenue SE • AM PEAK HOUR .. • ~ ill "- ::;; "" ~ .c I (!) .., C ~ e ~ 0 .. ID g ·e "- " .5 ~ "- ci 0 C) C S2 .I!! :ii o' 0:. " C l a: C .s C " "' 0 " ·e- "- '5 0 .c "' ;,;: ~ !!i e (!) ~ 1l ::; 0 " ·e- Q. .c "' ;,;: ~ !, 0 .. "- ~ 0 r ~ ~ !! ~ "' ., ~ 0 ~ 1= ~ Q. • EBLT 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBRT 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 WBLT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBRT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBLT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 44 1 19 0 56 10 66 0.72 0 NBRT 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 SBLT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBT 9 0 10 0 19 4 23 0.53 11.1 SBRT 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 53 29 0 75 105 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2005 AM Peak With Project Site Access North/160th Avenue SE t Lane Configurations V 4' l+ SigriControl C >~!Ql!liiH • . Free. Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Vs>IU/re?!ll!i,llllJ). >2'3. •>;IJ i s Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 Htourry.·ltt:i~tl!fi'lil!"-@~1,hi:: ,rnn.··e .• ~tr·,: •li1>·.•·•·l•i>:>:>i:1 c:1:,,1::t,!JW'r2s ............ K •11>••. ·•"'•• Pedestrians Li!n!3' Wicl!ll'(tt) .·•. Walking Speed (ft/s) f1,r~i,nt Bl1?qkag~ Right turn flare (veh) ti(@i~{l'.~™-~~jj~,;ili;· tH~!il~~!N9.P~WlH!tt~m~:1:1~ mm1t:1:~{1L~~-:-:' Median storage veh) ~}i~nm~1,r;1g·~~1ijm~t~1itil1m•· miJ~i!t•111111111~~m•.>.;;,i1m1ffllrn:11~111111m1·.: , •...... vC1, stage 1 cont vol ~_;!, s!~g~.~i!8Q(lf !(QI • " IC, single (s) 1_c;2 ,sra·e:'s) ....... , .•• , .. , •. 2 . . . g ' tF Volume Left 8 0 0 Average Delay 0.9 !.illt~~&Bf?~!ffi~~~rig!itinfi!iJ!i1lti1~;l.Jo/ifili!W::i•~~:rt13~;~1itffiwj9~r•f i ·i'\lilmmJ!;•' :,s;;t··•1111~:·• .· Baseline GARRYSBELL-ST51 7/23/2003 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 • Liberty Grove South Site Access/1601h Avenue SE • AM PEAK HOUR .. • ~ " 0 :,: -" .. .. 0.. ::. i ,= 1 C) " C " e "' -" 0 .. m u .. ·e [1- " C 'i C. a: 0 0 "' C S;> .. u a, ·e Q. a, ·" .; C. a: C 0 c a, 0:: 0 a, e' [1- s 0 € ~ ~ " > e C) ~ .8 ::::; 0 a, ·e [1- ,= ~ ~ ~ 0 .. u. ~ 0 :,: "' .. .. 0.. Ill .. " \ll -" 0 2 I- c a, e a, 0.. • EBLT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBRT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBLT 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 • WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.47 0 WBRT 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 NBLT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 40 1 13 0 54 1 55 0.72 0 NBRT 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 • SBLT 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 SBT 12 0 10 0 22 4 26 0.53 11.1 SBRT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 23 0 76 27 103 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2005 AM Peak With Project Site Access South/160th Avenue SE Lane Configurations Sig!iCo!itrol t Grade 0% 0% ){~\~~Ji:fyetj)'l:\W Peak Hour Factor HOrt;:w;dtii+.V,i'iiltSY''lafiifii\:::,-:,u ;;,,;:$;\:;:/;l/ff:01 1::fi,;;:, .,.:,&d!:fJr~frC,L ., .>kt. ·. t> • •• • , • . Pedestrians (ff) 5 0 :tJ!J1')!!'.1Jr>;1:!JWifl;, . ,, t 965 1700 7 0 0 A Baseline GARRYSBELL·ST51 Oo; ,o 7/23/2003 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 • • • • • • • • • • • Liberty Grove (With 46 Lot Evendell and no SE 136th) SE 128th Street/156th Ave SE PM PEAK HOUR m a. :; a. "' 8 N .c I (!) " C " e If :;J <D y 'e' a. " ·" ! ci 0 C> C >< y 'e' a. ., ·" ~ a. C s ii II'. il 'e' 0.. 8 ;a 3: 8 N EBLT 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 635 13 29 12 689 EBRT 386 8 30 4 428 WBLT 312 6 5 0 323 WBT 399 8 9 26 442 WBRT 3 0 0 0 3 NBLT 170 3 14 7 194 NBT 0 0 0 0 0 NBRT 102 2 3 0 107 SBLT 0 0 0 0 0 $BT 0 0 0 0 0 SBRT 0 0 0 0 0 2007 40 90 49 2186 7123/036:38 PM !l "' ! (!) ! il 'e' a. .c "' 3: "' 8 N I IL 8 I m a. " {!! l! " 2 >- ~ ~ if 0 0 13 702 0.93 1.4 0 428 0 323 6 450 0.92 2.7 0 3 0 194 0 0 0.92 2.2 0 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 2207 • • • • • • • • • • • 2005 PM Peak without Project -46 Lot Evendell/No SE 136th SE 128th Street/156th Avenue SE Ml'""' : - Lane Configurations 1a!1.f'\l·ITIIRW:tvl'>lie1i?'· Total Lost time (s) - ··r·10Jl)!Jilll'ffl!>~illiffi!>T~,f ·•·•· ~~~lt1tt$:lLfilJYt~~ ,,~ t1o "i tt "i r • • [1~0 .. ,19bQcfnlOO 1990••••19Q!)l,;'.l(l00i · 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 • Q.9:§;, • .1,00 •• 1,00., < Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1711 •fftJl:fe,l~cin Ol.·f i.Q.Q:i\iiit,,i~rn°,lW l~ill~ •• t,.1JQl:!l':l;IilOl~~WCt~tWo··,• Said. Flow (prot) 3336 1770 3539 1770 1583 fl\;l?el\nj!fifd .')f.Jl;()Q,ii'lilillii!1iilikl'',r'!!O.gQ > · 1.00 }0:95 :no Said. Flow (perm) 3336 380 3539 1770 1583 7/24/2003 --~lttfflflJflhffl't%lW&ffillflfff;IJlltlmnmt:t;JlPiffit\ij!!!l15H'.'.t;i;J!lllli1[~'1mtf~lij[ff~(~l!VJ;;?~TI;lll/J!f4l!~ Fr4m~~2i;;t;;;( :l;:t 1i: Protected Phases 4 3 8 2 Baseline GARRYSBELL-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 • • • • • • • • • • • 2005 PM Peak with Project -46 Lot Evendell/No SE 136th SE 128th Street/156th Avenue SE Lane Configurations ld,1;1.hRlow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) t~n~ml.!!il,!f'"-ai::tor Frt f;lf.f;'f-,d~'ij!" Satd. Flow (prot) a1fff!!srmlffea"' " · '"·" c;:.,p,.,;,,,:c•·,., tr. 1900 1900 4.0 0:95_. 0.94 1.,.01ti!''/i1, 3338 L06'" .---'\ I' "i tt "i 'I' .1900 .',11900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 t.Off 0,9.5 .00 LOO 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1770 1 m,,1:@o! , 'o.9s ::r,oo Said. Flow (perm) 3338 376 3539 1770 1583 };l§t~m~i(v~~J~ttl -·.· . . . 702 :':,j2,~~, 'l!ali~" , 450> t;f~~:,t110:t'1 '( ,<, Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Retml*l:iilUiPhases W)~:,::=~n.cc:c·.'!H''''L''~···· Actuated Green, G (s) 15.8 s_ij~Jll.~Y:iiit3t~~[!)9 (s) ·'·-.1.5.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 1-l!'im!l"/lsJ' 23.8 "23,8 '·"'"''" 0.57 116 23.8 10.2 10.2 ''23J8 ; 10.2iii '1.Q!2 0.57 0.24 0.24 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 7/24/2003 tftiffillm~P:kiiWJ'?:;~Jt#~;1lg:§E0M~i;;:;i::;:tJll:1mtm~~~:;mm~~~~~lllil'.E:!:~·~:tt.mJr~~:~~~h:B; ;;Jj~~~,!l!«llilrriii1ii~ii:=~·:i:;::1:mt1r1~/liii:/~~!!PJlililOOll~.:~tf:;:;~;;:!l!1?1::;:; vis Ratio Prat 0.37 c0.10 0.14 c0.12 Baseline GARRYSBELL-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 • • • • • • • • • • • Liberty Grove (With 46 Lot Evendell and No SE 136th Street) SE 128th Street/160th Ave SE PM PEAK HOUR l ::. Q. .., 0 0 N .c 1 (!) " " :, e "' "" :.i m .!/l ~ '!, a. " " ! a. 0 0 "' " " .!/l " " ·e a. " " ! a. " ~ " a:: 'll !, 0. ~ .c "' ;= 8 N ~ (!) ~ 1l :J EBLT 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 651 13 9 12 685 0 EBRT 48 1 ,32 0 81 13 WBLT 44 1 9 0 54 12 WBT 655 13 0 26 694 0 WBRT 1 0 0 0 1 0 NBLT 19 0 9 0 28 8 NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBRT 22 0 10 0 32 9 SBLT 3 0 0 0 3 0 SBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBRT 1 0 0 0 1 0 1444 28 69 38 1579 42 7/23/036:51 PM m ., 'll ·e Q. .c "' ;= "' 0 0 N 5 0 "' LL ~ :, 0 I "" l,'! a. :, IE ~ " 2 .... 'E i'l Iii 0. 0 685 0.92 0 94 66 694 0.97 1.6 1 36 0 0.68 4.9 41 3 0 0.5 0 1 1621 • • • • • • • • • • • 2005 PM Peak Without Project -46 Lot Evendell/No SE 136th SE 128th Street/160th Avenue SE Lane Configurations Sigr C\mtr:o!L Grade ~.\llQITl~ye!Jlf:ili Peak Hour Factor ~u/l~,111:iw:rat~(veh/h) Pedestrians !t~~fiWfcJ!ti>(ttl:C,•'i'·: Walking Speed (ft/s) Pereei'it'Bfdcka··e,, ... -.... ,-...... , ..... , .. -.ll Right turn flare (veh) ,~~119:1it~~1jt::~:rm:;ur: Median storage veh) l&~':•1ro '!fl" v lume 1,:,,;r.;,if~}i{~f,'1{4-s~illg :11::is;,.,,p_·--.-., vC 1, stage 1 conf vol v~~~f~ij1l2t~i:>offi:>1 tC, single (s) tG :2'.stiif'e"s.-.' ---"·-··· . g ' J 4.1 -t 41+ iFfee 0% f - tF (s) 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 7/23/2003 ill!!1i~-i*~llf11i~\'!!li':11 :·~~*!~!iiil:~,,itf: : t·m11:o:1~2~1,1tI1M~!~1.f:iil mffl:™ii11i'il1~Jfi~li!!lfl!Jrim1,~[91Til/fflfflj~~i1~€!:l,!0Ifmm,~9 cM capacity (veh/h) 826 777 105 81 573 98 76 604 Baseline GARRYSBELL-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 • • • • • • • • • • • 2005 PM Peak With Project -46 Lot Evendell/No SE 136th SE 128th StreeV160th Avenue SE --7/23/2003 t tllllMMilim11%Dl·r1RT'ffl~1'llllS~~~ Lane Configurations 41+ 41+ +f. +f. Sigf),Ci)\introl Free ,f"r~,;1,, "'' Stop Stop. Grade 0% 0% 0°/o 0% VoluJT\~ (yi,h/h) . "!!/)¥~"!!!''' Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 t-1011~1y1n1~Mi'rate,(!11"1l!i~J,1•''0J,,~1!!tl-;1j1J,,1'°rt1!~~fl.6"•,: . .:,:t~liA~1~a~ Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) ~~r¢1'!!J!l~l')9kage Right turn flare ~~~J't\lp~f Median Volume Total Baseline GARRYSBELL-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 • • • • • • • • • • • Liberty Grove (With 46 Lot Evendell and No SE 136th) SE 136th St1160th Ave SE PM PEAK HOUR m I ::;; Q_ "' ~ " 1 <!) "O C ~ l .. a, ll -~ Q_ .. . s [ a: 0 (.) g, ,2 ii -~ Q_ .. C 8. a: .!! C t}_ ll -~ Q_ s 0 " "' 5' "' 0 0 N EBLT 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 EBRT 0 0 0 0 0 WBLT 1 0 0 0 1 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 WBRT 2 0 0 0 2 NBLT 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 18 0 17 0 35 NBRT 3 0 0 0 3 SBLT 9 0 0 0 9 SBT 67 1 39 0 107 SBRT 0 0 0 0 0 100 56 0 157 7/23/0311:19 PM ~ m ~ <!) ~ .8 ::::; l Q_ " "' 5' "' 0 0 N ~ IL ~ :, 0 :c 1 Q_ :, le .:! " :, i= "E .. ~ " Q_ 0 0 0 0 0.9 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.38 0 2 4 0 0 13 48 0.68 10.5 0 3 1 10 15 122 0.82 0 0 0 31 188 • • • • • • • • • • • 2005 PM Peak without Project -46 Lot Evendell/No SE 136th SE 136th Street/160th Avenue SE t LaneConfigurations V .... ... . ..... 'f> .. . <f §[9fil;Jl1/ntrob St9p .. ·gu,e,,::c Fre.e . Grade 0% 0% 0% •~<'!'' ''''"'"V '"'"'') '11,'!/c,!J!Il1':•d11,111,1 , Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 141'il'l,rJi'>1<i'!!i,\i(ra1eJi'vehlti)'· ·. "'i•t••< t!,:;. + ~~Jtt~~"""~--,~ ,,. ,_' . . . . )}: Pedestrians ~1i~i~JIJ:i!,fUf!~ •. Walking Speed (ft/s) t!i'@i!t~l!ick1;1ge . Right turn flare (veh) MWffl~,1~Hl!iltij1:J:lt\ti~l§~~1mmu1111~ll!m:~1mm1m1mn~11i#lllii:i,i-it:11:~ -- Median veh) Baseline GARRYSBELL-ST51 7124/2003 Synch ro 5 Report Page 1 • • • • • • • • • • • 2005 PM Peak with Project -46 Lot Evendell/No SE 136th SE 136th Street/160th Avenue SE t 7/24/2003 ft'lltRWill!ill~Jtil~8,~-~iiffi•~1t~~~!lilli&IKIJ-illl Lane Configurations ¥ f+ 4' Sign Control Stop;:' .Fres Free Grade 0% 0% 0% i;/9fllr:/!e {)?eh/Ii) . }~\,r;;;,{; 4, ·t 1'48 3 . . 10 ; ·. t22 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1,1\itfr!y flo)'I ratEi.(veh/tl)i~,.,f,;}~~i\\11 ¥1:,, )J Ei>l :••··· !c3),1i;1i,;1,i 133 Pedestrians Liihe.WJd\h .. (tt) Walking Speed (ft/s) ft.fir'l;erjl2(i!lockag~ . turn flare Baseline GARRYSBELL-ST51 0 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 • • • • • • • • • • • Liberty Grove (With 46 lot Evendell and No SE 136th Street) North Site Access/160th Avenue SE P111 PEAK HOUR I ::. a. <') ~ .c i Cl "O C " e ~ g a, ~ "15' Ir. .. C i a. d 0 C> C ;.: ~ "15' Ir. " -" I a. C i II: "Ii ·e- a. -s 0 .c ~ s'. "' 0 0 N I Cl ! -' EBLT 0 0 0 0 0 EST 0 o o o 0 EBRT 0 0 o o o WBLT 0 0 0 0 o WBT 0 o o 0 o WBRT 0 o 0 0 0 NBLT o o 0 0 o NBT 20 o 17 0 37 NBRT o o o 0 o SBLT 0 o o o o SBT 76 2 39 0 117 SBRT 0 o o o 0 96 2 56 o 154 7123/0311:21 PM i(! " "Ii ·e- a. .c ~ s'. "' 0 0 N t lL !5 0 I .,, :,'l a. " a, ,l .,, u 2 .... I a. 7 7 o o 0.9 o 1 1 o 0 o o 0.9 o o o 5 5 13 50 0.9 o o o o o 14 131 0.9 o 10 10 50 204 • • • • • • • • • • • 2005 PM Peak with Project -46 Lot Evendell/No SE 136th North Site Access/160th Avenue SE t 7/24/2003 -~mirimailJ~illDD~ffl-fRll!!Mlll~!flJl!Jr+!lilllllllllllllBal~JJil!II Lane Configurations V 4' 'f+ §igpf()Qtro[ Stop ,faee>,cF'ctf;lfiJ Grade 0% 0% 0% )lg11:1~1\(Y1>tillll · s. tQ Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hoptl!~J~lg'l'{:,f~!'-ll(v~l'l/ll) if& ,~,.~.1,0,~t,, ii',~•:! 54 · 142 Pedestrians Lahe\Wiqt!i'fi~) Walking Speed (ft/s) f?~t~!it'B!o,i:kagf;l,i Right turn flare (veh) M~l!!ii'ti~mffe, · f,J!i/ ' I. t/<iii;i!l W Median storage veh) ~~Ji[~1t[gtiJifi'::\1~tijhii:~::t11:>1:l!g~:~:l!j1}S1)!§;!Jl:ii\;;it~;(J~I~Jljt!illil&i ::·J:Ji::,:';:, - vC1, 1 conf vol vol 1g1i11Jrmfil1~':AJ4'.~,n;!i:_~:;;~l!}!1i;g!'.;i(i~l1~]'.!r~i,re~~ITmtlIJITfiilllili~l~!iih:~7~fi!!~-fBEl,tRIW£iil[l1ifjjmm!i41!f~lftiti Volume Left 8 5 0 \f glyli!Jj"Rigl"!i · .. · cSH Baseline GARRYSBELL-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 • • • • • • • • • • • Liberty Grove (With 46 Lot Evendell and No SE 136th Street) South Site Access/160th Avenue SE PM PEAK HOUR "' 1 Q. ::! Q. <') 8 N .c ! (!) "C cc ~ e ~ " ., "' ~ ·e- Q. " .E i Q. 0 u ~ " ii ·e- Q. " cc 1 cc Jl cc ~ ~ ·e- Q. 8 .c "' ~ "' 0 0 N ~ (!) ~ ~ EBLT o o o o o o EBT 0 o o o o o EBRT 0 o o o o o WBLT 0 o o o 0 2 WBT 0 0 o o o o WBRT 0 o o o o 8 NBLT 0 0 o o o o NBT 21 o 21 o 42 5 NBRT 0 0 o 0 o 7 SBLT 0 0 o o o 14 SBT 68 1 39 0 108 1 SBRT 0 o o 0 o o 89 1 60 o 150 37 7/23/0311 :23 PM 18 "' ~ ·e- Q. ;e ~ 8 N l5 &1 u. 5 0 I -" m Q. ~ ~ " 2 I- E " !! &'. o o 0.9 0 o 2 o 0.9 0 8 o 47 0.9 o 7 14 109 0.9 0 o 187 • • • • • • • • • • • 2005 PM Peak with Project -46 Lot Evendell/No SE 136th South Site Access/160th Avenue SE Lane Configurations Sign Control Grade f t 0% ~l!II!:l~.{xetJ!!lti-.· Peak Hour Factor ·-·· .• ::••l,·1,t{'·f'r'it~·1·c_'}'Jt ·,:,i11m.i, ...•.. ·1'111~:,ii:19~1;1.,···· .. · 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 l,!~J,!J®Kfl~W Pedestrians Wl:\~,Wi<'l!hc(ftlx . · Walking Speed (ft/s) ~t\::ent]~l~~e,g!!! . · • ,·;.,;.,·• •J::mm Right turn flare M~l!!llij~: Median Volume Left 2 0 15 Average Delay 1.1 7/24/2003 Jijtijfili1l~11tr~~~m~11ffi~tBR~t~fci~;,~:i;!fvJ1Ji1L1'1ti1mrliGinttam11;I:~:~u:tn~1111:~11111&1i~m1~:::r~1;rn:: :,~mm~!t:·;:' Baseline GARRYSBELL-ST51 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 <® DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ' CORRECTIONS TO DDES PRELIMINARY REPORTS PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LIBERTY GROVE CONTIGUOUS/ L03P0005 & PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LIBERTY GROVE/ L03P0006 P. RECOMMENDATIONS: Revise recommended condition of approval: . (· d . Tlie stermwater detentien design sliall eom!Jly witli tlie Level 2 Flow Centre! requiremems !Jer tlie 1998 King County Surfaee Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). ec d. The storm water control facility shall be located in a separate tract and dedicated to King County unless portions of the drainage tract are used for required recreation space in accordance with KCC 2 lA.14.180. Revise recommended condition of approval: 12. The following road improvements are required to be constructed according to the 1993 King County Road Standards (KCRS): 02/09/04 d. SE 136'h ST from 160'h Ave SE to 162"<l Ave SE shall be improved to the urban neighborhood collector standard(south side only), EXCEPT for the first 270 feet east of l 60'h Ave SE. The first 270 feet can transition to a narrower width to avoid creating an adverse grade to the existing three driveways. Reverse slope driveways or other designs may be considered by DDES at engineering plan review stage. Exllibit No. _0=---- ltem ~-\_!:'!:) ~ P~<W Heceived /2: 10 -~ V King County Hearing Exafuiner LIBERTY GROVE & LIBERTY GROVE CONTIGUOUS School Walking Route Analysis A field reconnai ssance was conducted on July 2 , 2003 to determine the existing condition of likely school walking routes . The attached pho o..graphs represent a sample of the existing conditions surrounding the proposed preliminary plats of LG t r CO LI.)~ ~JOO u 5 -. PY L G > • 0 <.., v ~ Entrance to Elementary School. Note 8' Asphalt Shoulder . , f \t.E coP'I Exhibit No . c£ U M~\N Item No. :? :R <!> "'t:, \,, Received -/0 -C : I LG & LGC Sch oo l Wal k in g Route Pictures King County Hearing Examiner 1 LIBERTY GROVE & LIBERTY GROVE CONTIGUOUS School Walking Route Analysis . ----=-------. -. -------. . ~-. -. -. . . "(" ·.• ;_-.: .. . :. · ...... -. View south of 8 ' shoulder on 168th Ave. SE LG & LGC School Walking Rou te Pictures ' ,-.. LIBERTY GROVE & LIBERTY GROVE CONTIGUOUS School Walking Route Analysis Intersection of 160th Ave. SE and SE244th Street looking North. The existing 5' shoulder t enninates at the top of the hill. LG & LG C Sch ool Walkin g Route Pictures 3 LIBERTY GROVE & LIBERTY GROVE CONTIGUOUS School Walking Route Analysis Several Street segments have only gravel surfacing and grass shoulders . LG & LGC Schoo l Walking Route Pictu res 4 LIBERTY GROVE & LIBERTY GROVE CONTIGUOUS School Walking Route Analysis Vi ew West on SE 13 5th Street. Road Terminates. LG & LGC School Wa lking Route Pi ctures 5 LIBERTY GROVE & LIBERTY GROVE CONTIGUOUS School Walking Route Analysis View E ast on SE 135th Street, at 163 rd Ave. SE. Road Terminates. LG & LGC School Walki n g Route Pi ctures 6 LIBERTY GROVE & LIBERTY GROVE CONTIGUOUS School Walking Route Analysis : :·· . : ... ·· . · .. · .... -i: .... · .~-....... ;.. . . :-. View West on SE 144th Street. 8 ' Asphalt Shoulder LG & LGC School Walking Rout e Pi cture s 7 SEE DRAWINGS ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 March 22, 2004 David Casey Lakeridge Development PO Box 146 Renton, WA 98057 RE: Proposed Student Walking Route Application No's. L03P0005 and L03P0006 Dear Mr. Casey: The purpose of this letter is to respond to your letter of March 18, 2004 regarding school walking routes as conditioned by the Examiner for these plats. Should you choose to create a tract between Lots 16 and 17 of Liberty Grove Contiguous for a school walking path, you will need to submit for a plat revision. The alternative route through the plat would be allowed under condition # 22, but the plat revision is only needed to create the separate tract as part of the plat to provide access. At this point in time, your plat application has been appealed. You may submit for the revision at any time, however, until the preliminary plat receives approval, DOES will not take final action on a revision submitted. If you have any questions about your application, please contact me at (206) 296-7114 or e-mail at karen.scharer@metrokc.gov. 0\y, 1L__ Kruw ~. PPM ll Current Planning Section Land Use Services Division cc: Application Files MAIN FILE COPY '.lll 4 liPV LAKEl!CGE DEV iliC POBOX146 Renton, WA 98057 FAX COVER SHEI<:T L.USL). Company: /,t;,'rlj' Cov,j/y0£J£S Date: 3-I 7-0C/ Phone 2 O? --2 rr;-7//~ Number: Fax 2 OC,-Z '?~-(;~!.J Number: Regarding: t..,'/.Jer"/y r't..,',be,!y C <70/-,j;vov.r rj for review CJurgcnt Comments: Phone Number: fax Number: # of Page~: Z ( 425) 22R-9750 ( 425) 2211-7232 t:-J please comment a original in mail ~II .. Karen Scharer, Senior Planner !'Janning Section I ,and Use Services Division King Counly V.V.KS. 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southeast Renton, WA 98055-1219 LAKERIDGE DEVELOPMENT PO BOX 1.,; RENTON, WA 98057-0146 rKONE 425-228•'750 >'M 4Z~-22M-7212 REF: Preliminary Plats of Liberty Grove & Liberly Grove Contiguous D.D.E.S. File #S L03P0006 & LOaPo005 SUB: Proposed Location for Student Walking Route Vear Ms. Scharer; Lakeridge IJevelopment, Inc is in the process of evaluating how to comply with propofied Preliminary Plat Condition/+22 for both of't.he a hove menl.ioned projects. Our inlerpralion of lhe condition allows for flexibility in the location of the required student walking route. Rased upon our interpretation of the condition, we are considering the l'ollowing option. It is proposed that the width oflots 11 through 15 (Liberty Grove Contguous) be reduced lo lo 54•_ This reduction would allow for a new Tract belween Lois 16 and Lot 17 having a width of 10'. The Tract would provide a connection to 162nd where students could walk to the south, then to the easl lhrough the proposed improvements of the "Dickinson Subdivision", and then to the Liberty High School site. In a recent conversation, you indicated that this is a reasonable proposal to comply with Condition #122. We are aware that engineering plans will need to be submitted to show the details of the walking route JJrior to engineering plan approval. Could you please send us an e-mail indicating that our proposal would be acceptable by King County. Our e-mail address isjoneswayne(ul!Jwest.net. Thank you for your consideration. !'lease feel free to contact me at any time if you have any 11uestions concerning this request. Sincerely; D~c;;1ase1; 7 Lakcridgc Developmcnl, Inc. C:/Liberty/Doc.:uments/Karen Scharer 3-17-04 Karen Scharer Project /Program Mgr II DDES/LUSD • Current Planning Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW, Ste. IOO Renton, Wa. 98055-1219 Re: ).,03P0005 -Liberty Grove V L03P0006 -Liberty Grove L03P0015 -Nichols Place January 29, 2004 My husband and I (Richard and Anita Oliphant) are requesting that our comments regarding L01P0016 and L03RE038, Plat ofEvendell, be submitted under the above named applications. Any further comments to be made will be done so at the public hearings February IO ... -Liberty Grove and February 24th -Nichols Place. Thank you, Anita and Richard Oliphant 16519 SE 1451b Street Renton, Wa. 98059 (425-271-9825) P.O. BOX 1255 FALL CITY, WA 98024-1255 CELL: 206-227-8187 FAX: 425-228-7232 CASEY ENGINEERIN&'1 i..J:: (~;Qpy November 20, 2003 Karen Scharer, Planner L.U.S.D. King County D.D.E.S. L0SP000 6 RECEIVED REFERENCE: NOV 2 5 2003 Liberty Grove Contiguous, L03P0005, (L03TY401) and Liberty Grove, L03P0006, (L03TY403) Kli'lG COUNTY LAND USE SERViCES Response to November 12, 2004, Plat Screening, Request For SUBJECT: Additional Information Dear Ms. Scharer: On behalf ofLakeridge Development, Inc.,the following is a response to the November 12, 2003 letter. 1. Property Description, Engineering & Surveying: Attached are three copies of an attached "Waste Disposal Drain Field Easement" that is the only known easement that has not been disclosed at this time. This easement will be relinquished at the time the project is recorded. 2. Drainage: Attached to this letter are 10 copies of the requested additional downstream information. It is proposed that the combined water quality facility within the project be designed to provide for hydrology to the existing on-site wetland and the existing downstream system. 3. Rezone(s): The Applicant respectfully requests that the rezone application be withdrawn. This request for the withdrawal of the rezone application was made clear in the August 6, 2003 letter from Lakeridge Development to Karen Sharer. Attached is a copy of the letter that has been already submitted to King County D.D.E.S. STORMWATER HYDRAUUC ANALYSIS CIVIL ENGINEERING DESIGN LAND PLANNING MAIN FILE COPY Karen Scharer November 20, 2003 Page 2. Lakeridge Development, Inc. greatly desires to schedule a hearing date at your earliest convince. Thank-you for your consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at any time. Sincerely; SY o,wi 1v. C;? David W. Casey, P.E. Casey Engineering Attachments: 1. 3-Copies of "Waste Disposal Drainfield Easement" Document. 2. I -Copy of "Plat Screening Transmittal" Document. 3. I-Copy of August 6, 2003 Letter From Lakeridge Development, Inc. to Karen Scharer -previously submitted. 4. IO-Copies of Requested Additional Downstream Information. Cc: Bruce Whittaker, P.E., King County LUSD,DDES • King County DDES August 6, 2003 Attn: Karen Scharer LAKERIDGE DEVELOPMENT PO BOX 146 RENTON, WA 980S7-0146 PHONE 42S-228-97SO FAX 42S-228-7232 Re: Plat Screening Transmittal for Liberty Grove and Liberty Grove Contiguous L03P0005 & L03P0006 Dear Ms. Scharer All items of your plat screening transmittal have been addressed with the exceptions of; Page 3, 7a. Since Evendell was not successful in it's appeal of the rezone and since staff has made it clear that they will not recommend approval of our rezone petition we are dropping our request and will rely on density credits. We see no reason to improve the frontage adjacent to the southern boundary of parcels 0086,0087 and 0088 (SE 136th St.), and even less reason for a conceptual plan of requested said improvements. We all know what a half street looks like, and a conceptual plan is not going to change our requirement to construct it if it were truly necessary. Item 7 b. And 7 c. "Conceptual" frontage improvements of off-site road ways on which we have no impact should not be on your wish list of things for us to waste money on at this time. Any kind of meaningful "conceptual" desigu would require topography, drainage design and traffic review of channelization. We are looking at a minimum of $15,000 worth of engineering to provide something which there is no nexus for you to require. Our traffic report indicates that in the 2005 year the level of service for our affected intersections will not change nor will they go beyond level E with our project included. If for some reason you still request off-site improvements to SE 136th St. , and if the requested improvements are upheld by the hearing examiner, we will provide a thorough and complete engineering design of this roadway at the engineering plan review stage where it is appropriate. Sincerely; 'S_J) c,wi/ k/_ ~ For. Wm. Wayne Jones, Jr.i4ident, ~ Lakeridge Development, Inc. L03P0005 & L03P0006 Plat Screening Transmittal Page 3 e. Perform a travel time analysis to compare an actual morning peak hour travel time along the 160th Avenue to SE 144th Street to SE 156th Street trip versus a theoretical SE 1361h Street to 156th Avenue SE, with appropriate delays factored into the westbound left turn to proceed southbound on 156th Avenue SE. The newly constructed west leg of SE 136th Avenue SE may serve as a reasonably accurate source of data on the delays required to complete a left turn across 156th Avenue SE. Other single lane approach "STOP" controlled intersections along the portion of 156th Avenue SE, between SE 128th and SE 142"" Place. f. Updated traffic accident history (that is, include 2002). For more detailed information regarding the traffic study, please contact Kris Langley, Senior Engineer, Traffic & Engineering, KCDOT at (206) 263-6102 or (206) 296-7155 (or kristen.langley@metrokc.gov. Please provide ten (10) copies. 6. Road Variances: a. Please submit variances to the KCRS as necessary. b. Intersection spacing: plat entrance (LG) at 160th Avenue SE (measured relative to the intersection of SE 1351h/160th Avenue SE) does not appear to meet King County Road Standards for a Neighborhood Collector street. 7. Road Improvements: a. Please provide a conceptual frontage improvement plan for LGC that includes (under a rezone scenario) an improvement of the frontage of the three intervening parcels (0086, 0087, 0088) that appear to have been segregated via a plat KING CO ENGINEER SUBDIVISION NO 6846 REC NO 9410250673 from the Tax Lot 0085 (the northerly portion of LGC). b. Please provide a conceptual frontage improvement plan for LG that includes the referenced improvements to SE 136th Street to complete the improvements that are required of the Applicant of the Evendell subdivision (ODES File L01 P0016) under both the proposed (and subsequently denied) rezone configuration and the approved 46-lot (current zoning). c. If the Applicant for the plat of Evendel! does net succeed in the requested appeal to the County Council, the off-site connection of SE 136th Street will not be constructed. This requirement may be placed upon this application as potential mitigation of plats' impacts at the intersection of SE 128th Street/ 160th Avenue SE. Please provide a conceptual plan for the improvement of SE 136th Street between 158!1> Avenue SE and 1561h Avenue SE, including a sidewalk on (at least) the north side of the roadway, and a conceptual plan for the re- channelization of 156th Avenue SE at SE 136th Street. 8. Pedestrian Connectivity/School Walkways: a. Information has been provided in the past that school age pedestrians have a gate available for access to the west side of the Liberty High School. Identify the walking routes from both LGC and LG to the location of the gate. Identify the conditions along the route. Where abutting the boundary of the LGC and LG plats, and, if not otherwise required, provide frontage and off-frontage improvements to accommodate this pedestrian activity. 3 • L03P0005 & L03P0006 Plat Screening Transmitta, Page4 b. Provide an analysis of walkway access to schools serving the two plats of Liberty Grove & Liberty Grove Contiguous (Liberty High School, Maywood Middle School, and Briarwood Elementary). See the attached comments from the Issaquah School District. 9. Wetland/Stream: A site visit was made to verify the wetland areas on Friday May 30, 2003. Based on this field visit the following additional information in regards to wetlands. There is an off-site wetland located north of SE 136'" Street and east of 162nd SE. Flows from this wetland enter the site in the northeast corner·of the property and flow south along the eastern edge of the site, in the area of proposed lots 9 -16. It appears that the water ponds in the area of proposed lots 17 -20. The applicant's biologist should evaluate these areas for wetlands. The submitted wetland report does not address these areas of concern. 10. Revised Preliminary Plat(s): Provide 15 copies of each revised preliminary plat, as necessary, as a result of above-referenced requests for additional information and 4 copies of any special study requested for each plat unless otherwise noted. As a result of the review of the information, additional information (studies, revisions, etc.) may be requested at a later date. Further evaluation of these issues may result in the reconfiguration and/or Joss of Jots. 11. Rezone(s): Based on the information submitted, DOES staff finds insufficient justification to recommend reclassification of either rezone request, see Comprehensive Plan Policy U-122. You may choose to submit further information, which addresses this policy as it applies to each site. Please provide two copies for each rezone file. 4 ® Plat Screening Transmittal King County Preliminary Plat App's: Liberty Grove Contiguous, and Liberty Grove Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Service$ Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 LUSD FIie No. L03P0005 (L03TY401), L03P0006(L03TY403) Date of Information Request: November 12, 2003 · Deadline for Submittal of Information: February 12, 2004 1. Property Description, Engineering & Surveying: a. The title report discloses several easements affecting the property. Many of these were not included with the title report and need to be reviewed prior to preliminary approval. Some may need to be relinquished. Submit easement documents for LGC so that review of their impacts may be completed. 2. Drainage: Please respond to comment 4b of the previous screening letter dated June 3, 2003 which states:. b. Revise the Level 1 Off Site Analysis to include evaluation of the existing downstream drainage course from the Liberty Grove Contiguous site. It appears that the existing drainage course flows to the east of known capacity problems on Lot 6, Block 3 of Cedar Park Five-Acre Tracts (downstream points 30 and 31 in the Analysis). Please show appropriate mitigation for routing the post developed drainage through this area per Core Requirement 2 of the KCSWDM. Note that the Level 1 Analysis can be extended more than Y. mile if a problem is anticipated (1.2.2.1 KCSWDM). It is anticipated that up sizing the existing culverts east of 16othe Ave. SE will be required. A letter of positive intent from the property owner(s) is required for any proposed improvements off the R/W. A full description and Level 1 Analysis of the existing drainage course is required. The existing drainage course should be evaluated so that all options for the proposed surface water adjustment can be fully explored. It is still anticipated that up-sizing the existing culverts across Lot 6, Block 3 of Cedar Park Five-Acre Tracts will be required. Please note that the applicant for the proposed Nichols Place L03P0015 subdivision is also evaluating the feasibility of up-sizing the culverts. We suggest that coordinating this effort may be beneficial to both applicants. Please contact Bruce Whittaker at 206-296- 7211 ·for further information The proposed surface water adjustment has been placed on hold pending receipt of the above information. Please contact Mark Bergam at 206-296-7270 for more information on the proposed adustment. Please provide ten (10) copies. L03P0005 & L03P0006 2"' Plat Screening Transmittal 11/12/03 Page2 3. Rezone(s): Please clarify whether you wish to withdraw applications for reclassification or if you wish to continue processing the rezone requests. 2 Scharer, Karen From: Sent: To: Subject: Karen wayne jones uoneswayne@qwest.net] Monday, December 15, 2003 7:59 AM Karen.Scharer@METROKC.GOV Liberty Please reinstate our rezone request for Liberty grove and Liberty Grove Contigious. We understand that all you can do at this time is recomend denial of the rezone. If Evendale is successful in their law suit then we will negotiate for improvements. I understand that at this time you will recornend approval of the plats (with conditions) using density credits. Thanks Wayne Jones MAIN FILE COPY 1 April 21, 2003 King County D.D.E.S. 900 Oaksdale A VE. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Attn: Karten Scharer LAKE RID, r DEVELOP M.tNT PO BOX 146 RENTON, WA 98057-0146 PHONE 425-228-9750 FAX 425-228-7232 Re: D SITY TRANSFER '1f_ __,,,......,..~==-~ Liberty Grove L03P0006 Libe rove Contiguous L03P0005 Dear Ms. Scharer; Since the Evandale rezone from R4 to R6 was denied by the Hearing Examiner and is in appeal we feel we should cover all bases, and have therefor purchased Density Transfer Credits to use on these projects in case the rezone for them is also denied. Liberty Grove is 4.84 acres and at R4 would allow 19.36 units, rounded down to 19. We will apply 5 density credits to this project to bring it up to 24 units as proposed in the plat application with the R6 rezone. ""'· Liberty qrov{contiguous is 7.92 acres and at R4 would allow 31.68 units, rounded up to \ 32. We w,1n apply 4 density credits to this project to bring it up to the 36 units as proposed \ \.~·in the pit appuca;io1¥¥ith the R6 rezone. m. Waj)ri nes, Jr. ' Ii~/ President, L ridge Development, Inc. 206-399-7 400 m MAIN FILE COPY LSJ3~ Exhibit No. _\:...1:-__,_,,,,.._ __ _ Item No. !ti; Q~\.o Recetve<I _:_ --6 MAIN King County Hearing Iner File col' 04/22/2003 09;3& 2538593738 DAVIS CONSULTING PAGC 01 DENSITY RIGliT TRANSFER AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 22..i day of April 2003, ~tween Venlis Capital LLC, a Limited Liability Company (herea/ler referred to as "Transferor") and Lakeridgc Development, Inc. Thereafter referred to as "Transferee"). Transferor and Transferee are collectively referred to herein as the "Parties". RECITALS WHEREAS, tbe Transferor is the legal owner of certain "ttansfer of development rights" removed from the parcel(s) for which tax parcel identification oumber(s) and legal description(s) arc set forth io Exhibit "A" to the "Transfer of Development Ri 6 ht Sending Site Certificate", Certificate NUJl1ber 00022, DDES File Nmnber A.l:'3116, issued by Kiug County (hereafter the "Certificaten); and WHEREAS, the Transferee is developed ceTtain real property located in King County, State of Washington identitied !13 Liberty Grove (L03P0006) and Liberty Grove Co.ntiguous Plat (L03P0005) th<l ··Receiving Site"; !llld WHEREAS. pursuant to Certificate, the Transferring Site has been qualified to use, sell or otherwise transfer development rights pursuant to Chapter 21.A.37 of the King County Code to qualifying propenies such as the Receiving Site; and WHEREAS, the Parties have reached agreement whereby Transferee shall purchase from Transferor certain development rights ("DR") for use by Transferee in conjunction with the development of the Receiving Site which purchase shall ~ made pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in this agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration including the coverumt:s and promises herein contatned, the Parties agree as follows: I. Purchase a,1d Sale of DR's. Transferor sells to Transferee and Trilllsferee purchases fro:n Transferor a total of Nine (9) DR's as defined in Chapter 2JA.06 of the King County Code. 2. Price and Earnest Money, The pw-chase price to be paid by Transferee shall ~ Nine Thousand .Dollars (US S 9,000.00) per deosity right purchased hereunder for a total of Ei&:hty One Thousand Dollars (US $ 81,000.00) . .Payment of the purchase price sh.all be made in cash or other certi:fied funds at the dale of ciosing set fonh hereafter in paragraph 3. Simulations with the execution of this Agreement. Transferee shall deposit the sum of Five Thousand Dollan (US $ 5,000.00) representin.g earnest money for the purch~ of TDR 's hereunder. Said money shall be non-refundable al execution of this agreement. Upon closing_. the eilffiCst money shall be applied loward the purchase price. However, in !he event of 1em1ination of this Agre~ment by TrnJ1sfernr as a 04/22/2003 09:3& 2538593738 DAVIS CONSULTING PAGE 02 result of Transfert>e's failure to close the purchase transaclion as reqllired in paragraph 3 below, or Transferee's breach of this Ag:recmem including the failure of the representations set forth below in paragraph 5, said earnest money shall be nonrefundable. 3. Closing. The closing of the sale and purchase transaction hereunder shall occur on or bdore July 30, 2003. 4. Representations of Transferor. Transferor represents a.nd warrantll to Transferee that it is the legal owner of tile Transferring Site and that the Transferring Site has been ecnified for the sale or transfer of DR's as set forth in the CenifiC11le. Transferor makes no other representations and wa:rranties of 1111y type lo Tnmsfertt relative to tlw DR's or the Transferring Site. 5. Reprg;eptatjons of Transferee. Transferee represeuts and warrants to TrWJsferor that Transferee is duly organi2ed and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of Washing1on and is qlllllificd 10 enter into the transaction contemplated bi:rcin. Transferee further represents and warrants thar the Receiving Site qualifies or is eligible to qualify for receipt of Lie DR 's pursuant to the King County Zoning Code (K.C.C. 21A). 6. Responsibilities of the Parties, Transferor and Transferee shall cooperate with each olhor and act in good faith in obtoining approval for the transfor of the DR's to the Receiving Site, provided that all costs related to the approval of and the transfer of the DR's hcrc:\llldcr, includiog the prepanition and recordation of documents reqwred to consummate said tra.osfer, sh.a.LI be borne solely by Transferee. Transferor shall execute such documents as may be required by any examiner or other official representing to execute any documents which would convey ru1y interests in the Transkrring Site other than the DR 's. 7. Miscellaneou~. 7.1 Succes59rs ,wt Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upou the Parties. lhei.r respective agents, representatives, affiliates and successors and assigns. 7.2 Waiver and Modification§, The provisions of this Agreement may not be waived or changed e>1cept by a writing signed by the pany ag11ins1 whom such wa:iver or ch.mge is asserted. No waiver of breach shall constirute a subsequent waiver of any subsequent breach, and if any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invlllid, the remaining provisions shall remai.n enforceable. 7.3 Notices. Al.I notices or other communications provided for in this AgreemC.llt shall be deemed to have duly given if delivered personally, by certified mail return receipt requested, or by facsimile 10 the address or facsimile number of the receiving Party set fonh i11 this Agreement (or 2531 738 DAVIS CONSU G PAGE 03 such different address or facsimile number as either Party shall have specified in writing to the other). Notices personally delivered or sent by facsim.ile shall be effective upon their receipt; notices sent by mail shall be effective three (3) days after mailing. 7.4 Governing Law: Arbitration: Attorneys Fees. Thls Agreement shall be governed by and constracted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and the King County Code. In the event a dispu:e arises between the parties here10, said di!pute shall first be sµbmittcd to arbitration in Kins County, State of Washington, which llfbitration shall be governed by the rules of the Alllerican Arbitration Association. An independent arbitrator shall be selected by the Parties hereto or, if an W'bitrator shall be appointed by American Arbitration Association. The decision of said arbitrator shall be final and binding upon the parties and enforceable by a court of law. 7 .5 Headings. The headings, subheadings, and other captions in this Agreement are for convenience and reference only and shall not be \lsed in interpreting, construing, or enforcing any of the provisions of this Agreement. 7.6 TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE OF nus AGREEMENT. IN WffNESS WHEREOF, the WJdcrsigncd 11clmowledge that they have read this Agreement, undcntand it, agree to be bound by its tcl7.lls and conditions, and have caused this Agreement to be executed as of this day and year first above v.,rinen. ,.,. ,.? At. ' DA TED this -i,,.,_ day of 11., '-' "Transferor" \ (", (1 \'~ , "Tr~nsfere~' \, \ , i I \ \ ·. !. By~ u'L{ Its Pa..i /jb~. 1,n:s-EEE-S2t, w~2o=s 1::002 22 Jd~ Corporate Acknowledgements ST A TE OF WASHINGTON ) J ss COUNTY OF KING ) On this ~day or tl{_,{)KL, . 2005. before me the undersigned. a Notary Puhlic. personally appear&! btit~. )01..L/.J • 10 mc known to be the /?,µ. of //e,,rc7f {2,¥1'f4 ... the corporation that executed the within and (<;\Wt1.lllll.ll1'1l/M.J.S.trument, and acknowledged that ii was as a free and voluntary act and ~t~~( ~~i9.~.~P?~ton. ~~··c~.··~\,:,cN/ ._·.··. ·_)~ j"'t,/;i\·.'t'it.'?l;{~f ~ and official seal the day and year first ahove written. •• • Q T • ·-61 ~ ' ~ U): <!. ·:--:, '' ~ 1,;: ;;z_·§ ~· /A''<} ;;:.-I: _,i-u~ uc :o!:1 ~ pvvv. i~·:.-.':~> u '1-r::.~:-·"(;~-Nota? Publii~r the State of {:;' o·~ .. !~: .. -·~~,# Washington, residing at ~ ''/,),• ,._ WASP~ ,/ft1111,11,,111111\\\\i~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING J ~tta 121. &Ue__ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. residing at S110'!11al11<ie, Wa la Y\,"ff5Y\ Recording R&(luested By Ar,.IJ Wntlfl RecQrded Mall To: King Counly Department of Nal urar Resources Wate-r .iind Landa FtnoU!"C4!!! Oivti!don Re&ourco Landa/Open Space Sec'oon 201 S. Jackson, Ste. 600 Sel!hl&, WA 98104-3854 Certificate Num. b~r po_o'l]-_ . Date Issued _ ...,J~(U!li.-- DDES FIie Number A99P31 I 6 ® @f;;.&~&</-C€ 1STAM~ King County Transfer of De11elopment Credit Pilot Program 201 S. Jackson, Suite 600 Seattle, WA 98104-3854 TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT CREDIT SENDING SITE CERTIFICATE Pursuant to King County Code 21.A.55 ';;; Grentor King co..,inty, a poJllical :11ubd'iv1s1on r:,f the Stato or Washington r... Grantee-Ventls Capital, LLC, a Washington IJmfled UeblUty company Le~I Oescftp1i,on SW Y.. SW'./.. 5-22-5 A.is9t£o,·~ ""fax. Paresf Numbvr 05220S.C1225-04 This certifies that Ventis Capital, LLC, a Washington limited liability company owns 32 transfer of development credlt(s) removed from the parcel(s) for which the tax parcel identffication number(s) and legal descriptlon(s) are provided in Exhibit A hereto attached, which has been quallfred as a transfer of developmoot credit sending site. This certificate identifies the number of development cradtts that the owner may use or sell consistent with the provisions of King County Code.21A.55. The official record of these credtts·is maintained by King County. If there is any discrepancy between the number of credtts identified on this certificate and the official record, the official record shall control. The development credits may be used only on a receiving site(s) that has/l"lave been given nnal approval for additional residential density achieved through the transfer of developmenl credits In accordance with the King County Zoning Code (K.C.C. 21A). Approved by Repre.sen1ative or the King County Transfer of Development Credit Program fnteragency Rev/aw Committee Signature Palil!l 1 d4 c, c-.:, ,., ~. c·, <· STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )SS. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify 1hat I know or have sa1isfactory evidence that Mark Sollitto is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument. on oath Staled that he is authorized to e,ecute the Instrument and acknowledged it as the Program Manager, Transferable Development Credits Program of King County to be lhe free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned In the instrument. Dated: -~7'.1-1~3'/,_t?_I ___ _ Notary Public In end for the State of Washington Residing at Ptcs ,-to 1,J~s My appointment expires 1}/03 Cenilloat11 Number 00022 Oata INI.Hd DOES File NP,,DJ!>otA99P;;i11e P&oe2o1.f ~·=rE DISPOSAL oqA[J FIELD EASE~E~T T'.·-:= ·-· _:: ___ :0 •• _..:, :;.. •••• .::-v[ the foll::r...,.in~ <l~sc-:-ihed 1 and located in King County, l,,;3shingtcn, to ,.,.it: Lot 7 in Block 1 of Ja:1e:t'~ Renton Boulevard Tracts, as per plat recorded i~ Voluran 17 ~f Plats, on page 60, records of Kir:g County. Do hereby define, declare and dedicate the following ease- ment: an~ easement over, across and under that portion of ~ pr_operty descibed as follows: RECEIVED SEP O 3 2003 The East 130 feet of the North 50 feet of Lot 7, Block 1, t\t,~lo COUNTY -f of Janett's Renton Bo-..,levard Tr2cts, as pee plat recorded in LAND USE SERl[LC£$ Volumn 17 of Plats, on page 60, records of King County, '.Jash.1.ngton. Said easement is for the purpose of installation and main- tenance of the d~ainfield portion of an on-site sewage dis~csal system to serve the following described property: Lot 6 in Block i of Janett 1 5 Renton Boulevard Tracts, as per Volumn of Plats, on page 60, records of King County, Washing tuna The ground must be restored to its original condition after any installation, maintenance or repair is performed. These :covenants shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all subsequent owners thereof until such time as a public sewer is available to serve said property. In Witness Whereof, the said Grantor(s) have executed this /~.~~.~~~nt this "Z!:J._ day of l&ui , 1985. ~ ,/ .-<·=:r. .. ~·;:~,:·:·.... cc:~( e\, /!lit· -,,}:";;HP / ,,,;;:;_J !:: , ,; S'.f'M',t·;/U','1IASHINGTON, 1 c~·~~'t'y'"~·~· t:$, n~ ss. (Individual Ackno•·ledgement) I, ma<;J :::::f. 0;?Cer:,so"), Notary Public in and for the State of Wuhington, residing at (?(U'I. +o Y'-, do hereby certify that on this Z'-1 day of '-/7:cu.j , 1985, personaliy appear b.;fore me (Jr/ £ ;J/c.'rz.. (; to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within 5_nstrument and acknowledged that h l signed the same as ~ fr~e and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes herein mentioned. GIVEN VNDER MY HAND AND OfFICIAL SEAL this 2.i..l day of C.,77a,, 1, 1985. (/ ., -r m 0 0 ~ MAIN FILE co~ Notary Public in . -iU.-z... _ l-,.1---in and for the State of Washi~gton, residing at $aid Cou~ty. After recording returu lo: Mark A. Seek 13612 1601h Ave. S.E. R;,,,!OD, Washinglon 98059 • • DRAINFIELD EASEMENTS These easements (hereinafter the "Easements") me entered iuto this ;l41t..doy of :r., I j , /41' by and between Mark A. See.Ir. and Christine K. Seek, husbond and wife, as owners of Lols A, B, C md D, as described below. their heiis. successors, BD.d assigns; and Mark Seek and Chri.,tinc K. Sook. husband and wife, owners of Lot Das described below, their heirs, successors, and assigns. These Easements run wilh the hmd and bind eJI successors iD interest to Lots B, C, and D. This doc\lDleot., upon 1ccorcHag, replaces ond supersedes all prior recorded drainlield ood sanitation Easements executed by the panics hereto and/or penoioiog lo Ibo propcny described herein. WITNESSETII l. 11,c portics Seek own in fee certain real property in King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Traci I, Block J, Cedar Park Five Acre Tracts, according lo lhe plal !hereof recorded in Volume 15 of Plots, pngc 91, in King County, Washington. (hereinafter designated as "Lot 1•) 2. 111c parties Seek have recorded aa approved subdivision of Lot l. Recording No. 94 I02SIJ'v3, \\liicb divided Lot I into four lots. . This document memorializes certoin Easements for on-site sonilotilln cooc:eming the four lots, hcr-cinafter designated Lots A, B, C. and D. 3. The first lot (hereinafter "Lot A") is more particularly described as follows: Deg at the NW comer of Lot I, !hence S for I 00 feet along the W edge of Lot I, thence 90 deg E for 96 f, !hence 90 deg N for 100 t; lheace 90 deg W alang the N edge of Lot I for 96 feet to POB; tog w an ca.semenl for on- site snnitation purposes ~ver Lots B, C, and D. 4. The second lot (hereinafier "Lot Bu) is more particularly described as follows: DRAINFIELD EASEMENTS -I EXCISE TAX NOT OEQUIAED ~~-"°''""' l!y~~Oo- - I MAIN FILE C(l)P y4: i ;· • • • Beg a1 the Nil comer of Lot A, thence S for JOO f,:ct, thence 90 deg ll for 96 feet, thence 90 deg N for I 00 feet. thcoce 90 deg W along the N edge of Lot I for 96 feet lo POB; tog w an easCD1eol for on-site sanitation purposes over Lots C tnd D; and subj. to an eascmcol for on""Site sanitation purposes lo the beae61 of Lot A. S. TI1c third lot (hereinafter 11 Lot C 11 ) is mo1e particularly described as follows: Beg at the NE comer of Loi B, thence S for JOO feel, theuce 90 deg E for 8 feet, theoce 90 deg S for 29 feet, thence 90 deg E for 70 feet, theace 90 deg N far 129 feet, thence 90 deg W along the N edge of Lot I for 78 f,:ct to POD; tog w .111 cascmc:ot for on•sitc sanitation pwposes over, under and through Lot D; ond subj. to eascmeals for on site sanitation purposes to the: benefit of Lots A and B. 6. follows: The fowth lot (hereinafter "Loi D') is more p/lrlicularly described as B cg al the NE comer of Lot C, U1eocc E 330 feet along lhe N edge of Loi I, theoce 90 deg S for 300 feet, lheoce 90 deg W for 600 feet, thence 90 deg N for 200 feel, d1cncc 90 deg E for 200 feet, thence 90 deg S for 29 feet, thence 90 deg E for 70 feet, then 90 deg N for 129 feet to POB; subj. to eascmc:olS ror on-site sonitDtion purposes to the benefit of Lots A~ B and C; and subj. lo m easement for utilities. ?. Tho °"'1ew of Lot A are hereby cotilled lo an Easemoot for their benefit over, under and across Lot D, as described herein end in Paragraph 9. ne Easement described in this Pamg.raph is for the instaUotion, operaliDD aod maintenance of 11 druinficld md related piping for the on~sitc sewer system for Lot A The area c:ovcred by lhc Easemcot for the Lot A drainfield is more partioulerly desonoed 09 follows: Beginning .et a point 100 feet from lhe Northeast comer of Lot D, then West for 100 feet along the North boundmy of Lot I, then 90 deg. South for 130 feet, then 90 deg. Enst for I 00 feet, then 90 deg. North for 130 feet to POB. • S. The Owncis of Lot B an~ hereby entitled to no E11Scmcnt for lbcir benefit over, under and across Lot D as described be rein nnd in Parng.rnph I 0. The Easement described in this Paragraph is for the inslallatiou, opcratio~ repair and maintenance of a drainficld and related pipiug for the 04-sitc sewer system for Lot 8. The area covered by the Euscmc:U for the Lot B drainfield is more particularly described BS foUows: -OMINFIELD EASEMENTS -2 I ·, . ~: ' ~· • } ___ .•... • • Ill Beginning et the Northeast comer of Lot D, thee West for 100 feel olong the Nonb bounda,y of Loi 0, thco 90 deg. South for 130 feet, lhco 90 dcg,ecs E .. l for 100 feet, lheo 90 deg. North for 130 feel to the POB. 9. The Owners of Lot A further are hereby entitled to a non-exclusive Easffllcnt fol' their benefit over, 1a1dcr and across Lot D. The Easement described in this Paragraph is for tbe instollntioo, operation, repair and maintenance of certain piping. conduit and similar materials incide11tal to and appropriate for the dminfield for the on~itc sewer system for Lot A. The area covered by the Eosemenl conveyed in this Porogn,pb is more particularly described as follov.s: Beginning Ill the Southeast comer of Lot C, then East 140 feet lo a point 130 feel South of the Northern boundary of Lot D, then 90 dc,gr,es North for IO feet, then 90 degrees West for 140 feet, the 90 degrees South to 1110 POD .. together with any nrea sdjacent lo this area needed for access to or operation of the piping lying witl,in this area. 10. l11e Chimers oflol 8 further are hereby entitled to a nonaexclus:ive Uasement for their benefit over, under add across Lot D. The Easement described in this Paragraph is for the installation, operation and meintcn11Dcc of ccnain piping.. conduit and similar materials incidental to and appropriate for the dmin6eld for the on-site sewer system for Lot A. The area covered by lbc WeJ11cnt conveyed in lhis Paragraph is more porticulnrly described ns follows: · Beginning at the SoutJumst comer of Lot C. then East 240 feet to a poinl 130 feet S0u1h of the Northern bow,dary of Lot D, then 90 degrees North for 10 feet, then 90 degrees West for 240 feet, the 90 degrees South for 10 feel 10 the POB, together with DDy mea adjacent to tbis uea needed for .. ':le~_ to -~r opc_~tion of I.be piping lying wiU.in this areL- 11. The Owners of Loi D agree, warrant mid covenant that neither Ibey oar their heirs, successors, 1DHl/or assigns wilJ construct, mai.otaia, or cause to be maintained \.villain the Easement arcns described above as may be required by low: stn1cturcs, roads, driveways or trail: for vehicular traffic, or any other object that would impair the operation of lite drninfields or ancillary piping. or their compJinnce with applicable law. Further, the Ownas of Lot D agree. wnnunt ud covenant that neither they nor their heirs, successors, nod/or assigns wi II excavate or compact notwal .soils within any drainficld area serving or to the benefit or Lots A, D. or C, oncillnry piping, or related area. that may be required by law. 12. 1l1c Owners of Lot A are hereby entitled to a noa-e.xclusive Easement for their bcucfit over, under and across Lot C. The Easemeol described iu. this Poragraph is DRAINFIELD EASEMENTS -3 / ,,. ! • • for the installation. operation, repair ::ind mainteuam::e u£ certain piping. conduit and similar materials incidental to and appropriate for the drainficld fur the on~silc sewer syslem for Lot A. The area covered by the Easemenl conveyed in this Puagrapb is more .porticulorly described as follows: Beginning at lbe Soulbeasl comer of Lot B, Easlerly for 8 feet, lbCll 90 deg. South for 29 fcet lo lbe Soulhem Southwest comer of Lot C, lbcn 90 deg. Ensl for 70 fcet 10 lbe Soulheasl comer of Loi C, lhen 90 deg. Norlb for 10 feel, then 90 deg. Wesl for 60 fo:ct, Ihm 90 deg, ... Norlb for 29 feel, 111.., 90 deg. West for 18 fed lo Ibo West boundary of Loi C, then 90 deg. South for IO feet lo POD 13. The Own.,. of Lot 8 are hereby enlitled to a non-exclusive Ensemoul for their benefit over, under and across Lot C. The Eosemenl described in this Paragniph is for the installation, opemlion and main1enancc of certain piping, conduit DD.d similar materials incidenlol to und appropriate for tbc dminficld for the on•silc sewer syslan for Lot A. Tho orea covaed by lhe Easomeol conveyed in Ibis Pnragn,ph is more pmticularly described as follows: Beginning al lhe Southeast comer of Loi B, Eas1crly for 8 fcct, lhen 90 deg. Soulh for 29 feet lo lhe Soulhem S0ud1wes1 comer of Lot C, lhen 90 deg. East for 70 feet lo the S0ud1casl comer of Lot C, then 90 deg. North for 10 feet, then 90 deg. West for 60 feel, U1en 90 desrees Nonla for 29 feet, lhen 90 deg. West for 18 foot lo the West bouodary of Loi C, theo 90 deg. So111h for Io roe1 to POB 14. The Owners of Lot C agree. wa.nant ond covcuanl lbnt neither they nor their heirs, successorst and/or nssigns will construct, maintain, or causr: lo be maintained within the Easement area dc:Kribed above my structures., roads, driveways or trails for vehicular 1roffic, or any od1cr objecl 1h11 would impoir tbc operntion of the drainfields or ancillary piping, or their complimu;::e with applicable law. Fwther, the Owners of Lot C agree, warrant and covenant that neither they nor their heirs, successors. nnd/or assigns will excavate or compact natural soils within the Easement men. 15. The Owners of Lot A shall be entitled to an Ew:cmenl to their benefit over, mldi:r, nod across Lot B. ne Easement described in this Paragraph is for installation, mainleooncc and repair of piping end equipmcul needed to maintain and opcrote the nbove-described drainfields localed or to be located on or wider Lot D. The Easement io thi.s paragraph shall include on mea more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest comer of Lot D, then 96 feet East to the Soulheast come, of Lot B, then 90 deg. North for 10 feet, lhea 90 deg. DRAlNFIELD EASEMENTS -4 a=~--------------- ·t-. ·; • • • West for 96 feet lo the Wcstcm bounda,y of Lot B, then 90 deg. South for 10 feet to POB )be Owners of Lot B shall be cotitlcd lo use the Easemool area described herein to the extent it is 11~ and appropriate to opcrute their on,.site septic system and/or lo use: nod ~joy the Eascmeols described in Paragraphs 10 ood 13, except as described cts.....iiorc herein. 16. The Owners of Lot B agree, wammt and coveoanl that neither they nor their hein, ,uccesson. and/or assigns wiU construct, maintain., or ca.u.,e to be maintained within lhc Easement uca described above any structURS, roads, driveways or trails for vehicular traffic, or any other object that would impair the opetalion of the drainfields or ancillary pipiDs, or their compliance with applicabie law. Further, the Owners of Loi B agree, wanant and coveoanl that oeithor they nor their bein, suc:<:<Ssors. aod/or assiBDs will excavate or compact nat111111 Hib within the Easement uea. 17. Each owoer of Lots A, B, aod C, respectively, shall be respoosible for the costs or maintenance and repair of the dn.iDfidds and any mciUary equipment or piping of or related to tho Easements dcscribed herein, except lo tho cxleol such costs result &om &11 act or omission of another. When more thaa ODe owner shares an Easement aren, the: owners shall cooperate to allow for each owner to obtain beneficial use of the: Easement, and shall not interfere wilh the right of the other own.en to use and enjoy the Easement., described hercio. 18. If reasonable muinle::onn.cc. repair and service are not undertaken by the party rcspoosible for 5Uch costs, sucl, repnin may be made by the owoer(s) of the scrvient estate ond the cost of such action shall paid by lhe oWDcr(s) nf the dominant estate upon written dennmd. If such costs are ool paid within 10 days, they shall become a lien on t!te propeny of the dominaol estate, and the prevailing porty shnll be entitled to foreclose. In the event of any dispute under or concemiog these Easements, the ·prevailiDg party shall be entitled lo recover all costs, including a reasonable auorncy's fee. 19. Tho Eascmcms for the bcocfil of Lot A, sboll lcnninate 180 days after the owoors of Lot A elect lo book up to aoy public sewer system. The Easement for tho benclil of Lot 0, sball tenoinatc 180 days oiler tho owneis of Lot & elect to hook up lo nny public sewer system. The Easement for the benefit of Loi C, shall tenninalo 180 days ancr the owners of Lal C elect lo hook up to any public sewer system. ff II II II DRAINFIELD EASEMENTS -5 . --~ --~ i . ' .-· • • • OWNERS Of LOT A OWNERS Of LOT B OWNERS OF LOT C OWNERS OF LOT D d'l1ai tt.Ai. MukA. Seek Cfv;;~~r.J~ Christine K. Seek STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) COUNTY Of KING ) On this 41-< day or .T J \ ~ • I 99 2, befon, ••• tho undC1Si11Decl, • Nola,y Poblic in ond for the Stale o Washinpn, duly commissioned and sworn, persooally appeased Mw· IC • A. . ~'; e e t · , aad C.l..,h+.,e K St r l•c • , who cxecoted the within and (ongoing DRAINFIELO EASEMENTS and aclnowledged the said uislrumml to be the free and voluntary act nod deed of said corporation for the purposes thmin mentioned, and on oath staled that be was authorized to execute said document. IN WITNESS HEREOF, I have hereunto set my h211d and affixed my official seal llu: day nnd year wriltca above. DRAINFIELD EASEMENTS -6 Nor-..""'-;t:: (),.rU.1 . ..,1: NOT ARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Wasb:.iugtou. residing at _jj,! .,-fi· f c. My Commission fapires: ::z · '--9 7 • . -· • . -i :i1 ' ., ·•· \ ., 1 .. ''\ I • ) ~ • - . . After recording rctum to: Marie A. Seek 13612 160th Ave. S.E- Rcntoo, Washington 980S9 • 0 • EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED ~1A;zr,~ D!WNFIELD EASEMENTS Tbcse =mts (hcrcinofter !he 'Easements') are entered into this ZQ:h..doy of J:muacy by and between Mmlt A. Seek and Christine K-Seek, busbmd md wife, owners of Lots A. B, and C as dcsa,1,ed below. !heir heirs, suc=ors, BDd assigns; mid Mark Seek and Christine K-Seek, busbmd 111d wife; owner.; of Lot D BS described below, !heir heirs, successors., md assigns. WITNESSETH I. The parties Seek own in fee catain real property in King County, Washington, more particularly do,cribed BS follows: Tract I, Block 3, Cedar Pork Five Ac:,c Tncu, according to !he plal 1hereof R<Orded in Volomc IS of Plats. page 91, in King County, Washingtoo. (hereinafter designated IS 'Loi I') 2. The parties Seek have n,corded 111 approved subdivision of Lot I, Recording N0-9410250673, whi<h divided Lot I into four lots. This docum<nt memorializes certain euemmts for on-site s.m.itation coocemiog the four lots. haeinafte:r desisnated Lots A, B, C, and D. 3. _Tue lint lot (h""illafter_'Llt A') is more parti<U!arly described as follows:, Beg 11 !he NW comer oflot l, !hmc:e S for 100 r along the Wedge of Lot I, !hcoce 90 deg E for 96 I; !hmce 90 deg N for 100 t; 1hcoce 90 deg W along !he N edge of Lot I for 96 fto POB; tog w m easement for on-site saniution plll]loses OW< lots B, C, and D. 4. follows: The SCC<JDd lot (hcmnafltr 'L,t B') is more particularly described as Beg Bl !he NE c:<>mtt of Lot A. !hence S for 100 f; thence 90 deg E for 96 t; thence 90 deg N for 100 f; 1heoce 90 deg W along the N edge of ut I DRAINFIELD EASEMENTS -I ,·>· .. t' •. • ••. ; 8 ·.• ., .. ···~ .. ·~·~1 I; : I. ) 1 .......... --·:::m • 0 Ill for 96 fto POD; tog w m easement for on-site sanitation purposes ova Loi! C and D; md subj to BD eascmmt for on-site sanitalion purposes to the b<,icfit of Lot A. 5. The third lot (hminaftor 'Lot C'J is more particolarly described as foltoM: Beg Bl the NE comer of Lot B, thence S for 100 f, thcocc 90 deg E for 8 f, thence 90 deg S for 29 f, thmcc 90 ~ E for 70 f, lhmce 90 deg N for 129 f, thc:nce 90 deg W aloog lhc N edge of Lot I for 78 r to POB; tog w an euscmcut for on~ite sanitation purposes over, under and through Lot D; and subj to cosemeots for oa site sBDitation purposes to the bc:u.e:fit of Lots A 1111d B. 6. The fourlh lot (hereinafter 'Lot D') is more porticulorly described as follows: Beg at the NE comer of Lot C, dience E 330 f along the N edge of Lot I, thco,;e 90 deg S for 300 f, !hence 90 deg W for 600 f, thoDce 90 deg N for 200 f, thmc:c: 90 deg E for 200 f, thence 90 deg S for 29 r, Ihm.co 90 deg E for 70 f, Ihm 90 deg N for 129 f to POB; subj to wemC!lts for on-site sanitation pwposcs to the benefit of Lots A. B and C; mul subj. to an easement for utilities. 7. The awu.,. of Lots A, B, and C me hereby entitled to Easement.! to !heir beue6t over, under and across Lot D. The Eascmcots described herein an: for insuJhtion and maintCl'llDlCO of a dramlield md BDCillmy piping of an no-site sewer system ar such locations 011 Lot D that tho O,.Wers of Lots A, B, and C in an areo of Lot D mth.ia lhe following boUDdarics: the Northeost comer of Lot D Westerly to lhc Northeast ,;omer of Lot C, then Southerly for 129 feet to tho Southeast comor of Lot C, then Ensterly lo a point 129 foet South of the Norlheast Comer of Lot D, Iha, Nortborly lo the point of beginning; provided, however, thlll my drainficld must be installed in Accordance with opplicnblo law, md shall 11<'1 cause the removal or altcmtion of 111y CUITClltly cocisting structure, drainliold or improvemenl Theso easements collSlitu10 covenants that rUD with the lmd, and shall be tttmsfared ,wethcr or not refcrC11ced in the deed of ,;onveyance, and are binding on the SIICCCSSOIS in interest of both lots, their heirs, assig,,s and transferees. 8. The Owum of Lot D agree, Wl1rrlllt and covenant that neilhcr they nor their heirs, succes!ors, aod/or assigns will construc:t.. maintain. or cau:ie to be maintained within the drainlield area 111d rellled area as may be required by Law: structures, roads, drivCWll)'s or trails for vd,icular tralli<, or 1111y olher object !hot would impair the opcrotion of tho drainfields or onci!Lvy piping, or their compli8Dce with applicable law. DRA!NFIELD EASEMENTS -2 I • l I l i i i ' i 1 ' '·! ., ···- ··-, ' I Ill Further, the Owneis of Lot D agree, Wlll?lllll md covenm,t thot neither they nor their heil,;, suc:cessors. md/or assigns will excavate or compact natmal soils within my drninfield area serving or to the benefit of Lots A, B, or C, m,cillary piping, or Rioted area !hot may be requiJod by law. 9. The C>Ymc,s of Lots A m,d B shall be entitled tom ""5tmODt to their benefit over, midcr, and IICIOS5 Lot C. The Easemmts descnl>cd ill thi,, Paragnpb arc for installotioo, maintcnaDce and repair of piping aod equipment oeedcd to maintain and operate the abovc-descnl>cd dninfields located or to be located on or under Lot D. The £=eats descnoed in thi,, P"'"B'DPh shall occupy the soulhenimost ID feet of Lot C fur the entire southerly margio of the Lot, ond sholl be for the joint benefit of the owne!S of Lots A, B, ud C. The Owners of Lot C ag,ee, wamnt and coveo:mt that neither they nor their hcil,;, successors, md/or assigns will CODStnlct, maintain, or cousc to be maintained within the easement orea my struc:tuRs, roads, driveways or n,,ils fur vehicular tmllic, or my other object that would impair the operation of the dzawiclds or mcillmy piping, or their compliance with applicable law. Further, the Own= of Lot C ag,ee, wammt md covenant that neither Ibey nor their heiis, successors, and/or assigns will excavate or compai:t natm1ll soils within the ""5ement amL 10. The Ownc:n of Lot A shall be eolitled to 111 eusement to their beoefit over, uoder, and across Lot B. The Easemmt descnl>ed m thi,, Pm,graph is for mstallaticm, mninu:rumce 111d repair of piping and equipmeot needed to IDIWltain md operate the above-desaibed dminfields located or to be located on or 1111dcr Lot D. The Easements described i,, this Poragn,ph shall occupy the southernmost IO feet of Lot B for the entire southerly margill of the Lot, and shall be for the joint beoefit oflhe owoen of Lots A and B. The Owners of Lot B ogree, Wllmlllt md covmant that neilhcr they nor their hei!S, suceessors, aad/or assigns will construct., maintain. or callle to be maintained within the casement area my stracturcs, roads. driveways or tnrils for vehicular traffic. or nay other object tbnt ,wuld impair the opmnion of the dnunfields or m,cillmy pip ins, or their ""mpwmce with applicable law. Further, the Owneis of Lot Ba~ wammt md covcuaot that neither they Dor their heirs. !UCCCS10IS1 md/or as.sip! will excavate or compact Do1wal soils wuhin the easement area. 11. Each °""'°' of Lots A, B, aod C, respc<tively, shall be respcmsible for the costs of awnteoance 111d ,q,air of the dninliclds md m,y ancillary equipment or piping of or related to the EasemCDIS d=noed herein, except to the extent such costs result from an act or omwioa of the Owners of Lot D. 12. If reasolWJle rnsiotmaocc, repair and service are not 1111dmnken by the pany respoll511>le for such costs, sw:h rq,airs may be msdc by the owncr(s) of the scrvient esble and the cost of sw:b actiDD shall paid by the owner(,) of the domin.ant estate upon writtm demand. If such costs an, aot paid withm IO cby,, they shall become a lien on DRAINFIELD EASEMENTS -3 J ) .. _· =--.. --.... • • ~ • ·~ • •' r !•" • '•' G I j j i ' 11 .• ' :j ' ' ---- '!. ··r .. • .. .,. \ -· 0 Ill written dcmmul. If ,ucb costs are not paid widwi IO days, they shall become a lien on the propony of the domi»ant estate, and the prevailing petty shell be entitled to foreclose. In the event of my dispute under or coocemiDg these Easements, lhe prevailing pmty shall be entitled to recover all costs, including • reasoeable al!omey's ftt. 13. A: _.__The EasemenlS for the benefit of Lot A, shall terminate 180 days ofter the own on of Lot A elect to hook up to my public sewer system. The Easement far the benefit of Lot B, shall termi»ate 180 cloys ofter the owners of Lot B elect to hook up to uy public sewer system. Toe Easement for the beoefit of Lot C, shall terminate 180 days after the ownea of Lot C elect to hook 11p 10 any public sewac system. OWNERS OF LOT A STATE OF WASHINGl"ON ) ) COUN1Y OF KING ) OWNERS OF LOT(\ j @Ja . .,)#Jt ?X.Seek u ~,,J0 7-, Christin• K. Seek On this~ of :=i:;,,_,~ , 199_5 before me tho undesigned, o Notary Public in and for the State fW ~ gton, uly commissioned and swam, p nally ,.... mtd • who executed the within and foregoing DRAINFIELD EASEMENTS and acbiowledged the said instrument lo bo rho Ji:oe and voluntary act and deed of said coiporution for the pwposes therein mentioned, aud on oath stated that he DRA1NFIELD EASEMENTS -4 · · · ¥w~c 4.) ·-. ,~f .. _.J(,;1,fii-"'@ -· · ·· .. ~.-·' ·· -· ·'C::····2 .---.,·.··--.:~-~' :.1: ·--·: .· .. . . ··: ' ., :'.~ ,J " -~ ""i .,, . )_, ·.i l\i . - i. 0 • was authorized to exoouto said documou~ IN WITNESS HEREOF, I have hereunto set my bmld and affixed my official seal the day and year writtou above. / ~~ ·_:_ .:J~ II'\.) ... ....,~ ·~·~"' Washingtoa n:sidins at fJ' My Commission Expires: ffi DRAJNFIELD EASEMENTS -S -·, lJr!• __ . -·~v~~~~.~1~~~,~,~------.~~~- L ·' ; t'. I" / " \ ,..._f;-•;;; __ ,. __ _ Alhr ,~rdiaa nihun to: Mark A. Sek 13611 160th Aw. SA Reolon,. WHhington 91059 • - DRAINAELD EASEMENT REVISION Thi• HviR• sn •F"ment p•rtainiris ta cartaia eucmoats (hemnafler the •Euomcmts.• 01 "DR.All'IIFIELD BAS£MENTS'") anterH into on. tho~ day of J~ US t by aad batweon Mark. A Sc:ck and Cbristiao X.. Sook. bmbtad and. wit•, 11 owi111ra of Lott A. B, C 1ad D, u dascriltcd bolow, thciir beirt. NCC011ors, aDd 1uigu. ._ rcconl~ ia dlt DlAmlU required by law. Thi1 Raviaia11 rum witb lh1 1111.d &nd liiad all ave.cu.on in ialind. Thi• chtcumnt. vpoa ~rdi.ag. ,-placoa and aupeuadu oaly Ibo Ea.Nmeola H 'fOCilicaUy Ml rartla bolow. Excopt 11 ,pecifically Mt forth below, daa EaSlllfflllltl PCJ1&in unclwlgod. wrrn&S$UH Tho l1pl ducriptioa for lb, Loi A drainfielcl OIHIZIIIDl Oil, OYlf and under Lot o. Plod in Pan.graph 7 or tho DRAINFIELO EASEMENTS, it benby 11Uptt1ded and nplaoai with UN rolloWlflg= Beginning al II paint lOO foal Wall of the Northtian OOraff ,r Lat D aJeas lU Northam boundary of Lat D. di.an Wut ror I 00 fNI 1lu1 di, Nartb IMumb.cy of Loi D, 1h-a 90 iog. Soulh for 130 Ceol. lhen 90 ilea,. Eaat for 100 (nl, lua 90 dtg. North fo, 130 foot 10 ,OB. la all other r•rpccC• tho I>RAINFIELD EASEMENTS nauill u.obuaed. REVISIONDATEDlhi,.l.-,Jdayof Jlu9u'zf , l99l. OWNERS OF LDr A STATE OF WASHINOTON COUNTY OF KING ) .. ) On dai1 d:.J, day ttf 8 c/~ ,J S. f . 199 S'", bofora IP th• uudfflip,od. a Nollry Pl&blio in 111d Cor tho State o!WaahingioD. d~ eommiuioned 111d nwm. ponoaally app111rod&:/k ~,J'.a..c.l( , 1od C (1 <K"-"< le. ~Ulf who u:oculed Ibo wilbi_a and foreg11ing DR.AD-lflELD l!ASBM2NT R£VIS10N aod acknowleda•d the uid. i.utnam•nl to N tho [ie,o 1111.d w.lWlll.ry act Cor cbo puipa1111 tboroi.n mcH1.tKtncd. aad 01:1 oalh st.ahd lhll they were authorii,::111 lo e:11.ft:ule uid docwneal IN Wrrn'ESS HEREOF. t hno haraualo aal ray hand and affixed rny omci1I .ul ~ day and )'Mr wtiltoa above. EASEMENr REVISION -1 EXCISE TAX NOT REOUIRED ~:: "' II I MAIN FILE 1 . Copl' ----------•• • •• • ' :,. : '' ',.: :· :· •• :· -•• ; •• ,: • • < • : -I • At, ... ._ CLARIFICATION Of DRAINFIEUl EASEMENT I $L• Z /6ot-,. At1,-, ,t.-iDrt. lJ,I 4tecr,.., Theoe easeincmJ (hm:iaafter the "EaRmcnu'') an, emcr.d into lhis 241h. day of Fcl>ruary, l 998, by ...i betwocn Mark A. Seek and Chriaine K. Seelc, husband and wife, as OWllffl of Lots C and Lot D, as desaibed below, their bars, 5UC«SSDD, and usign,; uid Mark A. Seel< ...i Christine K. Seelc, hwband ud wife, owner, of lot D u detcribed below, !heir hein, ,uccossors, ...i wips. Those Easerncnts run wilh lhc land ...i bind ID successors in interest 10 Lots C .and D. WIJNESSFTH I. The parties Seek own in fee certain real properly in KiJ18 County, Washington, more panicularly dacnl>ed a, lilllows: Tr1CI 1, Bloclc 3, Cedar Pm Five Aae Tr1Cls, according to the pw thereof recorded in Volume 1S ofPlab, pase 91, in KingCoUlll)', Washington. Except the Nonh IOOfeet of the We,t 192 fed. 2. The Seeks have recorded an approved subcfivisioo of lot l, Recording no. 94102S067J, which divided lol l into four lou. Thelied<s also have recorded drain ftdd oasemenc, for the three new lots on lot D, recording number 9507211416, ...i tlus document is to c:larify the ~t lilr Lot C. 3. The lint Lot (llereinoller "Lot C") it more particularly described u follows: The North IOOfeet oftheEut 71 r ... oftheWesl 270 foot AND the South29 feet of the North 129fcct oftheEul 70feel ofdte Wesl 270 f• of Lot I, B1ock3, Cedar Puk f',ve AaeTiKts, KaJrding tolhe plattlw:Rofrecorded., Volumo 15 ofPlall,paae 91, in King Counly, Wubi.ogtmt; u per Kina COUIII)' ~ Subdivilioa Nwnl>er 6146, recorded under Ki"I Coonty Reconfing Num1,c:r 94I02S067J. 4. The socood lot (ltereinall<r lot "Di io mon: paniaJJuly dacnlled U follawl: Lot I, Bloc:ltJ, Cedar Park Five Aae Tracu,aa:ordingto lhepL,t tbereof',.,..,.,led in Volume 15 of Plats, pav 91, in King Coumy, W•lhiogton; u per King County Entp,- Subdivision Numbrs 6146, recorded Wider King Coumy Reconfing Numbe,-94102S0673. Except the The Nonh 100 foot of the Woa1 270 lffl AND the South 29 r,.. of ... Noni, 129 feet oflhe Eut 70 feet of the Wcot 270 feet. 5. The OWnas of Lot C .. heni,y elllitlod to an Euemmt for tbeir beacfit ""'• wider ud ICl'OSI Lot D, u detal>ed herdn. 'TIIII -..__ ill tin Pm ... ip11 io for the iAslallation, operation, rcp,ir and OIUDleDlnce of I dnmfield and i.i4'ed pipins for 11.e oo-tite sewes liJIIOm for Lot C. Tho area ...-..t by the -mr tho Lot C dninlicld is more particularly daoribed u follow,: Bqpnnine at I poi,.1200 --... Nonbeut -«Lot D, dim WOii to Ibo Nottbellt comer of Lot C, lhea 90 des, oaudl 119 feer. lltca 90 Ilea. Eal! tor UO feet, .hen 90 dq. North to Point of ........ EXCISE TAX NOT RfQUIEI ~11-..DMlbl BY::s:Nl!.f'> ,DIM .... . ' ..- • CLARIFICATION OF DP.AlNFIE1.D EASEMENT 6. The~ for1hebtndil ofl.ol C • .i.aa......,.1, 1111 daysall<r lheownas of Loi C elect lo hook up lo any public ..,....11)'11..._ 7. The ownen of Lot D agree, warrant and ......-llw neither they nor lheir heirs. $UCCUS.Ors. and or assigns wiD amsuuc:1, rnauuin., or cuse 10 he mainslint.d within the Easement aru described abovus may be,equiml by law: ll1uclurel. roads, driveways or lnils for vducular traffic, ..-any ocher Clbjea I.bad -"" iqair the opcratio• of1hc drainlidd or ancilluy pipia& or 1heir compliance willupplicable law. Further the owners ofl..ol D IJ"C, warnnl and co-..., neither 11,ey nor their heirs, successors and or 1heir wigns will cxca .. e or compoct nal\lnl ,oils within Illy drainlidd area sening orlo theher.dil afl..ol C, ancillary pipin«. orttlaml .,...lhll maybe required by law. OWNERS OF LOT C OWNERS OF LOT D &/j(f_~ &1.i«-U MARK A. SEEK MAllK A. SEEK ~r.jJ_ C~l:JiJe CHRISTINE K. SEEK CHRISTINE K. SEEK STATEOFWA.SHINGTON J ) COUNTY OF KING ) on 1his 24th. day of Febnwy. 1991, before me 1he uod<slip,d. Normy Public in and for the S1ate ofW1sllin11on. duly '*"'"'*Wutoed and-. pcr-'ly ~ Matlt A. s..i.. and Chnsdne K. Seek, who cxeculod the wilhin ...i foRpng llllAJNFIELD EASEMENTS and admowledged lhe ,aid .,.,_ ta be 1tee 111d "1luma,y 1<1 md deed of said~ lbo1'0ip,Rbthcac.i.t ..-· d. -rd~ '!U..authoria1:t.&ocxp;u11se-dfx, m.~,l'l.v.tt'~ IN Wl1NESS HEAEOF, I ba,. hcraao • my band and iDJ afficial ICII the cltyud,ar~ -... It. ~,1. , .• --~ .. '6'( I .f;;, ':-:;.s,oN 4.;-. .s;_•, r·/r~TARti\ 11 \ 'U -'°• ii! ~ A.llJC : J •, •· : '• ->,;:-•• ~-• ···!··~.f '·~ • '• : .. , ,~.-2 I . ~- dmp, inc. • (FORMERLY DALEY ENGINEERING CO.) MBE-DBE ••• DALEY-MORROW-POBLETE,INC. F' L .J.::· ir.. t"' PY , ~ .,, )/ llll.;IQ.f;,; ~~ ENGINEERING-PLANNING-SURVEYING 726 Auburn Way North Auburn, WA 98002 (253)333-2200 August 18, 2003 Karen Scharer King County ODES 900 Oaks Dale Ave. SW Renton, WA98055-1219 ·.·"-·~ ..... -. .. . i"i" ..... ·"f,' L03FOOO~ :. ·~;.-.,' ~. ,··.it~.~-;;~--·:, L03P0006 FAX (253REC.~!VED :...:. SEP O 3 2003 ,._,.1u vdUNTY LAND USE SERVICES • FtE: Liberty Grove · ) & Liberty Grove Contiguous (LGC) L03POQ5 -006 ·~.f·.~: A survey of the walking conditions in and around the proposed preliminary plats of Liberty Grove and Liberty Grove Contiguous was conducted on Wednesday, July 2, 2003. The survey of walking routes was based on information provided by the Issaquah School District Transportation Department, regarding probable walking routes for school children. Other information included the current location of bus stops for each of the three grade levels. The information gathered has been categorized by grade level. Some photographs are available as examples of described conditions. Not every segment of the surrounding road network was photographed. The breakdown is as follows: Liberty High School: Of all the schools providing educational services to the proposed plats, Liberty High School is the closest institution. Access to the upper fields of the High School was achieved at one time by walking south on 162"" Ave. SE, approximately one block, and continuing east on 1371h Place, to the end of the cul-de-sac. This route assumes that frontage improvements will be completed as part of the Liberty Grove (LG) and Liberty Grove Contiguous (LGC) plats. Both sides of 1371h Place have sidewalks that were constructed as part of the nearby Liberty Lane subdivision. In recent years, a fence has been constructed at the end of the 13~ Place cul-de-sac which separates the existing walking path and the upper fields of the High School. Tract "A" of the Liberty Lane Plat was not originally designated as a walking path. It was originally established as a Storm Water facility and the walking path likely grew out of the original access road to the pond. The removal of that fence and the construction of a gate would facilitate safe walking to and from the school. However, the existing Tract "A" would have to be modified to provide for public access over the existing storm water tract No other safe walking routes exist between the proposed development and the High School. Maywood Middle School: Maywood is located several blocks south of Liberty High School, on 1681h Ave. SE. An 8' asphalt shoulder with fog line extends west from the school entrance, along SE 144'h Street to 1601h Ave SE. A combination of asphalt and cement sidewalk extend north from the intersection, towards LG & LGC. Unfortunately, the improvements terminate at the top of the hill, at approximately SE 142"" Place. From that point north, there are no notable improvements. Safe access is possible however, from 1681h Ave. SE, if children were allowed to travel through Liberty MAIN FILE COPY • High School as described aLv,e. Assuming access to the High School l:lrounds, Maywood student could then exit the High Schools east gate, onto 168th Ave SE. and travel south. The shoulder improvements on 168th Ave. SE vary from 4 to 5 feet of asphalt and/or compact gravel, with a fog line. Duling the site visit several area children of varying ages were observed traveling along 168'" Ave. SE. While children are currently using the existing improvements along 168th Ave. SE, they do not meet the approved safe walking route standards preferred by the School District sand the King County Roads Division. Preferred improvements include an 8' paved shoulder with fog line or extruded curb. If access to the High School grounds is not possible, then no safe walking route to and from Maywood Middle School is possible. Briarwood Elementary: Briarwood Elementary is located northeast of Liberty High School, approximately 3 blocks. An 8' asphalt shoulder with C-curb extends from the school entrance on SE 134th Street to the intersection with 168th Ave. SE. An 8' asphalt shoulder, with fog line, continues south from that intersecfion towards the entrance of Liberty High School. From that point there are no safe walking routes connecting the proposed plats and the school. Assuming access to the High School grounds, Briarwood student could then exit the High Schools main entrance or east gate, onto 168th Ave SE. and travel north. If access to the High School grounds is not possible, then no safe walking route to and from Elementary School is possible. Bus Stop: The Issaquah School District has identified an exisfing Elementary bus stop at the intersection of 160th Ave SE and SE 136th Street The nearest High and JR High School stops are located at 162"" Ave. SE and SE 130th Street. Both busses for the High and JR High School pass through the intersection at 160th Ave SE and SE 136th Street Given the proposed development of LG & LGC, combined with the approved plat of Evendale and the proposed plat of Hamilton Place, one block to the north, the School District has agreed to establish a combination bus stop for all three grade levels at 160th Ave SE and SE 136th Street A combined bus stop at this location would provide safe access to transportation for all four proposed projects and the exisfing children in the Derryhurst neighborhood. The applicant is willing to work with the School District to provide whatever additional improvements are necessary to accommodate the proposed combination bus stop. Requested Improvements: In several conversations with representatives of the Issaquah School District, at no time has the District indicated that they would require off-site improvements to be constructed as part of the LG or LGC proposal. The focus of all conversations to this point has been the location and design of the proposed combination bus stop. Conclusions: After reviewing the available information, conducting a site visit and communicating with representatives of the Issaquah School Distri~ we have found that there are limited possibilities to provide safe walking routes for school children in the area surrounding the proposed plats. There is, however, an opfortunity to work with the school district to develop a combination bus stop at the intersection of 160 Ave SE and SE 136th Street that will service several adjacent projects in addition to the proposed preliminary plats of LG and LGC. If you have any questions, please contact me at (253) 333-2200. Since;/ !d------- Hans Korve Planning Manager DMP Inc. L 0 LC,& LGC File No: L03P0005, 0006 & L03TY401 Comment Response dmp, inc. MBE-DBE (FORMERLY DALEY ENGINEERING CO.) DALEY -MORROW -POBLETE, INC ENGINEERING -PLANNING -SURVEYING August 18, 2003 Karen Scharer 726 AUBURN WAY N AUBURN, WASHINGTON 98002 Ff LE COPY TELEPHONE(253)333-2200 FAX(253)333-2206 i:J.-.,,,., ' (;; " .· ·:e:" ' ' ~;,_,.;;, B' 1,/'}':~ ["') -~, .. ..J King County DOES LO 3 P O G O 6 900 Oaks Dale Ave. SW S[p O 3 Renton, WA 98055-1219 2DDJ RE: Liberty Grove (LG) & Liberty Grove Contiguous (LGC) L03PM611Jf'/ipq~/Vty -~ St.rnJCEs Dear Ms. Scharer: In response to your plat screening letter dated June 3, 2003, we offer the following responses: 1. Property Description, Engineering & Surveying: The preliminary plat maps have been modified in accordance with your request for items" a" through "f'. If you have specific questions, please direct them to our Land Surveyor Paul Morrow. He can be reached at (253) 333-2200. (15 sets) 2. Plat Calculations: The Density & Dimension worksheet has been revised as requested. See attached. (15 sets) 3. Recreation Area: The original plat of Liberty Grove was a combined project. As such, the majority of the recreational space was combined on the LGC site to provide a more useable recreational facility. In response to your comments, we have revised the design of Liberty Grove to include suitable, on-site, recreation space in accord with KCC 21A.14.180. 4. Drainage: The submitted drainage report addresses .both LG and LGC. a. A drainage adjustment has been submitted. Please refer to the submitted plan revisions and revised Level 1 Off-Site Report. b. See the revised analysis. The level 3 flow control is being proposed to mitigate the existing problems within the private properties that make up the downstream conveyance systems. As such, no easements are being provided. As an alternative, a new conveyance systems from the project site, south to SE 1441h Street, may be provided in conjunction with Level 2 flow control. Both options are offered in Task 5 of the Downstream Analysis. MAIN FILE COPY I •. 'LG&LGC File No: L03P0005, 0006 & L03TY401 Comment Response c. See revised Downstream Analysis and the revised conceptual drainage plan. d. See Task 5 of the Downstream Analysis and the revised conceptual drainage plan. 5. Traffic Study: A revised Traffic Report was prepared by DN Traffic Consultants. Please see the revised Traffic Study dated July, 24, 2003. (10 Sets) 6. Road Variance: The proposed SE 135111 Place intersection has been relocated to comply with existing KC intersection spacing standards. No variance is required. 7. Road Improvements: The Applicant is objecting to the request to provide conceptual road improvement information for the frontage along SE 136th Street. If frontage improvements are required, the applicant will provide the required engineering drawings during that phase of the projects. For a cross section of the possible improvements to SE 1361h Street, please refer to the KCRS manual. 8. Pedestrian Connectivity/ School Walkways: a. Liberty High School Gate: The gate described in your Plat Screening letter was not located during a field visit. At one time, n unofficial walking path existed at the end of SE 137111 Place, west of LGC. The old walking path appears to (Tract A of the plat of Liberty Lane) connect the west end of the existing cul-de-sac, to the upper fields of the High School. Children living adjacent to the walking path indicated that the gate has been blocked by a fence, and that access is no longer possible. A more detailed review of the legal description and plat map of Liberty Lane, indicates that Tract A was originally the storm water pond for the development, and was never intended to provide pedestrian access. The existing bollards and walking path were likely the original access road for the storm water pond. A more detailed review of the existing walking conditions is described in the attached School Walking Analysis report. b. No safe walking access exists between the proposed plats of LG and LGC and the schools ·that will provide educational services. Only scattered segments of safe walking routes exist in the area. Most of the existing segments are limited to the periphery of the neighborhood and do not provide access to or through the interior of the neighborhood. With construction of required internal plat roads and frontage improvements, the children of LG and LGC will have safe walking access to the existing and proposed bus stop at the intersection of SE 1361h and 160th Ave. SE. A more detail discussion is available in the attached School Walking Analysis report. 2 ·- .LG&LGC File No: L03P0005, 0006 &L03TY401 Comment Response 9. Wetlands: A revised wetland report has been provided, which addresses the concern raised in your screening letter. No additional wetlands have been identified. (see H&S Consulting report, dated July 18,2003) 10. Revised Plat Drawings: We have provided 15 sets of the revised plat drawings as requested. 11. Rezone: While we do not agree with staffs recommendation to support the proposed rezone, the applicant has provided Staff with the necessary documentation to make use of KCC 21A.37, the County's TDR program. This will allow the applicant to continue with the proposed number of units without approval of the requested rezone. Please refer to the attached density calculation worksheets. In addition to the information requested, we have also attached 15 sets of the LG and LGC SEPA checklist for your review. The revised sections are indicated with underline. The check lists were modified to reflect the change from the proposed re-zone to the use of the TDR program to achieve the desired lot count. Additional clarification was also provided as to the proposed sewer line extension. We have also attached copies of the existing septic field easements for each of the existing properties. The existing easements will be removed at such time as public sewer service becomes available. This has been noted on the submitted site plan. If you have any questions, please contact me at (253) 333-2200. Sincerry, +~- Hans Korve Planning Manager O:MP Inc 3 ® King County Department of Development ·and Environmental Setvlces Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (206) 296-6600 TIY (206) 296-7217 Alternative formats available . upon request Drop-Off Cover Sheet for Land Use Services Division PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME IS NECESSARY FOR ALL DROP-OFFS Project No.: Lo» -\"eio ,; ~ c)c) {., Project Name: Lb-e---,7 f,,qy, ~cl LA c_ FROM: n~'\? E~, tkAs. fioJ" vL Company Nae I Contact Person TelephoneNo.: 2-S:C:, ~~'3, L2-0c) TO: K C\J e.,-._ s, c..hv-0"- Date Received by LUSD ~(C~~'W~~ SEP O S 2003 K.C. t>.o.e.s. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY KING COUNTY STAFF (please i9,in Short Plat~ Please specify item(s) dropped-off: ~e_ °' \\,=l~cJ,,__ 1 y·Ll-"'-S~ iTII"'\ '\l\o., ".:::"'.:flS 1 \p;:,1t7 LJ..b',.(c,;;L,ec'> J k:p-f?.c:A--:--:<'.. j :111'~{-/.\;_ £\j2?:Y1, ~(«A /(<-P-x;- L,_,:-.._\Y:,,~ Y-o.0" VcW\'T ) S'f:0-~ ifWJ:,sq.<~\\ f MMe. f~~ Lot Line Adjustment Permit \l.ev,,d J('!+ ~) 5cf'I'' G:J.yv,~,,-'(,,,~-0 ,.:. Please specify item( s) dropped-off: Right of Way Permit Please specify item( s) dropped-off: Clearing / Grading Permit Additional information requested; please specify item(s) dropped-off: Other:------------------------------------- PLEASE NOTE: All drop-off item(s) will be logged into the computer under the project number, therefore, it is important that the top portion of this form is completed properly before you drop-off anything. Assistance in finding a project number can be provided by speaking to a Land Use Services Division Person of the Day (POD) or the Zoning/Land Use Technician. Your cooperation is important. Thank you. LUSD Drop-Off Cover Sheet lg-c,s-<lropoff.pdf 05--30-2002 Page 1 of1 DMP, INC. )( .·.·. E11gi.·.neering • Surveylng.tlll.· •,f,.'."'it4ann.·. 7.!6 Aub"urn Way North . ·~ ' ' ··· AUBURN, WASHINGTON 98002 IirJ. i•,i>i .. LETTER, 'F TRANSMITTAL . ·i~;3) 333-2200 "~ (253f7333-2206 iO ";0~~S cica Qf s.J.0-lz Ack: Lo<:, ?oo s--oo.s WE ARE SENDING YOU O Attached D Under separate cover via __________ the following Items: > \ ce; \D /0 \(_) D Shop drawings D Copy of letter 'L D Plans 0 Samples 0 'Specifications tJ Change order D ----------------~----- THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: > ~or approval D For your use efAs requested D For review and comment D FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS IS: 5 D Approved as submitted D Approved as noted D Returned for corrections D Resubmit ___ copies for approval D Submit ____ copies for distribution D Return ___ corrected prints o ________________________ _ D PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO--------------------- SIGNED: -"t-f'_-~~=-=-:::::======-======-- PRODUCT 240T If enclosures are. not as noted, kindly notify us st once. • King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 June 3, 2003 Wayne Jones Lakeridge Development PO Box 146 Renton, WA 98057 RE: Notice of Request for Additional Information or Studies • Application No's. L03TY401 & L03P0005 -Liberty Grove Contiguous Date Filed: March 11, 2003 Date of Complete Application: April 8, 2003 Application No's. L03P0006 -Liberty Grove, Date Filed: March 11, 2003 L03TY403 -Liberty Grove, Date Filed: May 7, 2003 Date of Complete Applications: May 15, 2003 Dear Mr. Jones: The purpose of this letter is to notify you pursuant to King County Code Title 20, that the Land Use Services Division is requesting additional information and/or studies to complete the review of your project. The information is described on the enclosed plat screening transmittal. When submitting the requested information, include a copy of the plat screening transmittal and retain a copy for your records. Provide a cover letter, which lists how each item, was addressed. Any clarification or explanation of the submittal can also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATTN: Karen Scharer, Planner II, Current Planning Section 900 Oaksdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 If the submittal is hand delivered, submit at the address above. Your application is on "hold" from the date of this notice, until the date you are advised that the additional information satisfies this request, or 14 days after the date the information has been provided. You will be notified if the Division determines that the information is insufficient. Please note that the supplemental information required after vesting of a complete application shall not affect the validity of such application. MAIN FILE COP\/ L03TY401 & L03.05 -Liberty Grove Contiguous L03TY403 & L03P0006 -Liberty Grove June 2, 2003 Page 2 The deadline for the submittal of the necessary information is September 2, 2003. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist, which may justify an extension of this date, you may submit such request, in writing, for consideration by this Department. Failure to meet the deadline shall be cause for the Department to cancel or deny the application. If possible, please submit all of the information in one package. If you have any questions, regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-6758 or Karen Scharer at (206) 296-7114. ~:_~ Karen J. Sc2. Project Manager II Current Planning Section cc Kim Claussen, PPM 111, Current Planning Section, LUSD Bruce Whittaker, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Kris Langley, Senior Engineer, Traffic & Engineering, KCDOT Nick Gillen, Senior Ecologist, Site Development Services, LUSD Application File ® King County Department of Development and Envirorunental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Plat Screening Transmittal Preliminary Plat Application of Liberty Grove Contiguous and Liberty Grove LUSD File No. L03P0005 (L03TY401), L03P0006(L03TY403) Date of Information Request: June 3, 2003 Deadline for Submittal of Information: September 2, 2003 1. Property Description, Engineering & Surveying: a. One additional Temporary Benchmark within the application site is needed, along with appropriate elevations (per KCC 19A.08.150(B)(2)), shown on the preliminary map. b. The datum required for vertical and horizontal control on the final recording document, must be as specified in King County Code Title 19A.08.130 unless exemptions within said code are met. c. Although additional horizontal control monumentation will need to be shown on the final recording documents, the monuments used to control the topographical survey should be shown on the preliminary map. d. There appears to be a fence encroaching northerly over the southerly boundary line of the Preliminary Plat of Liberty Grove Contiguous. (Shown on preliminary map per KCC 19A.08.150(B)(1 )). This encroachment issue needs to be resolved prior to preliminary approval. The Land Surveyor may want to discuss resolutions with the Platting Unit of the Engineering Review Section. The resolution may affect the density yield. e. Document the separation between existing structures to remain and proposed property lines. Setbacks required under KCC 21A.12 must be maintained, or approval of a zoning variance would be required. f. The title report discloses several easements affecting the property. Many of these were not included with the title report and need to be reviewed prior to preliminary approval. Some may need to be relinquished. Submit easement documents so that review of their impacts may be completed. The above notes apply to both plats except as noted. Although these plats are under two separate applications, there is reliance upon one-another. Note that recording simultaneously or in a limited sequence may be required. 2. Plat Calculations: Submit alternative Subdivision Density and Dimension Calculations for each plat under the R-4 with the density credit transfer scenario. L03P0005 & L03P0006 Plat Screening Transrr Page 2 3. Recreational Area: Revise the Plat of Liberty Grove to include adequate on-site recreational area of 390 square feet per lot (KCC 21 A.14.180). 4. Drainage: a. A drainage adjustment is required to divert the drainage from the Liberty Grove Site to the Liberty Grove Contiguous site. Also, the adjustment should include routing existing south flows from Liberty Grove Contiguous to the drainage system on the east side of 160'" Ave. SE. b. Revise the Level 1 Off Site Analysis to include evaluation of the existing downstream drainage course from the Liberty Grove Contiguous site. It appears that the existing drainage course flows to the east of known capacity problems on Lot 6, Block 3 of Cedar Park Five-Acre Tracts (downstream points 30 and 31 in the Analysis). Please show appropriate mitigation for routing the post developed drainage through this area per Core Requirement 2 of the KCSWDM. Note that the Level 1 Analysis can be extended more than Y. mile if a problem is anticipated (1.2.2.1 KCSWDM). It is anticipated that up sizing the existing culverts east of 160the Ave. SE will be required. A letter of positive intent from the property owner(s) is required for any proposed improvements off the R/W. c. Please update the Level 1 Analysis to reflect new culvert improvements recently made to the culverts at locations 25, 27 and 29. Evaluate the upstream off site flow entering the site along the northeast corner. Revise the conceptual drainage plan to address the off site flow. d. Include a narrative in the Level 1 Analysis describing how the existing wetland hydrology is to be maintained following development. Revise the conceptual drainage plan to show any additional proposed drainage conveyance. Please provide ten (10) copies. 5. Traffic Study: Please provide a revised traffic study, which evaluates the following items: a. An AM peak hour analysis of the intersections analyzed in the TIA submitted with the plat application b. An alternatives analysis that addresses the Hearings' Examiners decision for the plat of Evendell, specifically, the denial of the rezone request (and, reduction of the permitted number of lots to 46), together with elimination of the requirement of off-site construction of the SE 136'" Street (156'" Avenue SE to 158'" Avenue SE) connection. c. Updated existing conditions (2003) levels-of-service (Page 7, Table 1 ). Please retain the 2001 information (unless "2001" is a merely a typographical error) to address previous testimony related to the reductions in regional trip activity resulting from local market conditions. d. The 26% distribution south along 160'" Avenue SE may be excessive under a "with SE 136'" Street" scenario. The travel path to the intersection of 142"d Place SE/SE 156'" is nearly 33% further along that travel path as compared to that using an extended SE 136th Street. 2 L03P0005 & L03P0006 Plat Screening Transmittal Page 3 e. Perform a travel time analysis to compare an actual morning peak hour travel time along the 160'" Avenue to SE 144'" Street to SE 156'" Street trip versus a theoretical SE 136'" Street to 1561" Avenue SE, with appropriate delays factored into the westbound left turn to proceed southbound on 156'" Avenue SE. The newly constructed west leg of SE 136'" Avenue SE may serve as a reasonably accurate source of data on the delays required to complete a left turn across 156'" Avenue SE. Other single lane approach "STOP" controlled intersections along the portion of 156'" Avenue SE, between SE 128'" and SE 142"• Place. f. Updated traffic accident history (that is, include 2002). For more detailed information regarding the traffic study, please contact Kris Langley, Senior Engineer, Traffic & Engineering, KCDOT at (206) 263-6102 or (206) 296-7155 (or kristen.lanqley@metrokc.gov. Please provide ten (10) copies. 6. Road Variances: a. Please submit variances to the KCRS as necessary. b. Intersection spacing: plat entrance {LG) at 160'" Avenue SE (measured relative to the intersection of SE 135'"/160'" Avenue SE) does not appear to meet King County Road Standards for a Neighborhood Collector street. 7. Road Improvements: a. Please provide a conceptual frontage improvement plan for LGC that includes (under a rezone scenario) an improvement of the frontage of the three intervening parcels (0086, 0087, 0088) that appear to have been segregated via a plat KING CO ENGINEER SUBDIVISION NO 6846 REC NO 9410250673 from the Tax Lot 0085 (the northerly portion of LGC). b. Please provide a conceptual frontage improvement plan for LG that includes the referenced improvements to SE 136'" Street to complete the improvements that are required of the Applicant of the Evendell subdivision (ODES File L01 P0016) under both the proposed (and subsequently denied) rezone configuration and the approved 46-lot (current zoning). c. If the Applicant for the plat of Evendell does not succeed in the requested appeal to the County Council, the off-site connection of SE 136'" Street will not be constructed. This requirement may be placed upon this application as potential mitigation of plats' impacts at the intersection of SE 128'" Street/ 160'" Avenue SE. Please provide a conceptual plan for the improvement of SE 136'" Street between 158'" Avenue SE and 156'" Avenue SE, including a sidewalk on (at least) the north side of the roadway, and a conceptual plan for the re- channelization of 156'" Avenue SE at SE 136'" Street. 8. Pedestrian Connectivity/School Walkways: a. Information has been provided in the past that school age pedestrians have a gate available for access to the west side of the Liberty High School. Identify the walking routes from both LGC and LG to the location of the gate. Identify the conditions along the route. Where abutting the boundary of the LGC and LG plats, and, if not otherwise required, provide frontage and off-frontage improvements to accommodate this pedestrian activity. 3 L03P0005 & L03POOO' Plat Screening Transn Page4 b. Provide an analysis of walkway access to schools serving the two plats of Liberty Grove & Liberty Grove Contiguous (Liberty High School, Maywood Middle School, and Briarwood Elementary). See the attached comments from the Issaquah School District. 9. Wetland/Stream: A site visit was made to verify the wetland areas on Friday May 30, 2003. Based on this field visit the following additional information in regards to wetlands. There is an off-site wetland located north of SE 136'" Street and east of 162"" SE. Flows from this wetland enter the site in the northeast corner·of the property and flow south along the eastern edge of the site, in the area of proposed lots 9 -16. It appears that the water ponds in the area of proposed lots 17 -20. The applicant's biologist should evaluate these areas for wetlands. The submitted wetland report does not address these areas of concern. 10. Revised Preliminary Plat(s): Provide 15 copies of each revised preliminary plat, as necessary, as a result of above-referenced requests for additional information and 4 copies of any special study requested for each plat unless otherwise noted. As a result of the review of the information, additional information ( studies, revisions, etc.) may be requested at a later date. Further evaluation of these issues may result in the reconfiguration and/or loss of lots. 11. Rezone(s): Based on the information submitted, DDES staff finds insufficient justification to recommend reclassification of either rezone request, see Comprehensive Plan Policy U-122. You may choose to submit further information, which addresses this policy as it applies to each site. Please provide two copies for each rezone file. 4 May 6, 2003 · DOES -Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 CITY C: RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: LIBERTY GROVE CONTIGUOUS-L03P0005 & L03TY401 Dear Ms. Scharer: Thank you for the opportunity of reviewing and commenting on this project proposal. Renton' s Planning/Building/Public Works Department comments are as follows: I. Water service will be provided by King County Water District #90. This project has existing sewer availability from the City of Renton. 2. The proposed development is within Renton' s potential annexation area. Therefore, we request that the street improvements (roadway widening and pavement section, curb and gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, etc.) per City of Renton standards be required for the portion of 160th Avenue S.E., 162"• Avenue S.E. and S.E. 136th Street abutting the development site. We also request that the internal street system, including right-of-way width, be installed according to City of Renton standards. Sincerely, ~/z1J.2.1~ Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. cc: Neil Watts Jennifer Henning LysHomsby Sandra Meyer --t;1m:mm:ntticur--:l-:-OS_S_S_o_u-th_G_ra_d_y_W_a_y_--R-en-to_n_,_W_as-h-in_g_to_n_9_8_05-5----,-----~ ~ AHEAD ()p TH.E CURVE \:;%I' This paper contain$ 50% recyded material, 30% post consumer King Coumy Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 DATE: March 27. 2003 TO: Issaquah School District, ATTN:. ___ _ FM: Kim Claussen. Project/Program Manager Ill ~ • RE: Proposed Plats of Liberty Grove & Liberty Grove Contiguous & Rezone Request_ LUSD File Nos: L03P0005, L03P0006 & L03TY401 The Land Use Services Division (LUSD) has received an application for a subdivision in your District. Enclosed is a copy of the plat maps received by the Land Use Services Division on March 11, 2003. In order for us to adequately evaluate this proposal, provide the most accurate information to the public, and for LUSD to serve the School District better, please provide us with the following information: Which schools do you anticipate the students living in this subdivision would attend? Jr. High/Middle ('(o.. ). I · 'J !( ;, ' \ ' Sr. High __ _,_(..c.i..i:~---'-,-'-:;...J, lc,.-._S_,J __ ....._/."'l-'-,,..· ·-------'-'-'-(_-,,_.•"""f_, _____ _ i ·~-"( ' 1. < J'ilf th students walk or e bussed t these schools;_1 _ . / (J)L ~ JJ Elementary · -CJ.,tA.P r--o U-v-.. 57<-C-v;,._f/c. ,~ S 'A 1.1Jl sf: <ft, I. Jr. High/Middle hr .J J ~ Ii CA-.~ C-v /1-tK ~ rr--de w, I ..I. -J V-c,(u/1'1~.f,-Sr.High jws5'-e& '--(J.,l0{ TIJ {~ tv,4/Kw~ ,µ j ifl"t,fi ~e students will be bussed, where do you anticipate the bus stops will be locate~lf that information is not {l,t q,_v~'-available at this time, currently, where are the clos..est bus 1 sto1>s lpcated to this site? r L L<--,,-, s _ .J, . ,0+ {) -di 15'.>~f\v.a.,; t. at s t. l/ ;:s 1)2f ;1,o-t.JJ1,1g•'-<i!s1-, a-uuz re ~~ S · -<KElementary i'5b OOR-.5 f., e} S 'i' 132.~:,S; I i-()--tJAlqs· t @ S,t.J lfl~.;, " It<-·~ ~J '11 ~Jr.High/Middle /'72."tf AIW ' 'z:: @ S· t-I 30-th ~T -l@A11t ;Si; e1 $.~ l 3i &,W '*-tsr. High fi\0£1' J1,,3rd 814 S:-£. /fJ. Ct. t?O'tl, pl I_ I ' /// -4, Other Comments: UJl'l.?r,,. / 6 tJ ../1, ;I-ff SE /L-,',.4_, 6u ~ ?-I./?'/ II'-k/ / -1f' '-(Jv, J::5S:;1c<:.J\ .Ds'l-r,-cf-w.(/ /r1tJI::. "'-'f lz/17/u'J Sft,1c1AYJ . f--~ y /-.J &l h c, v'¥ s s ~e cuL 0-etvv /1£ s--PL o/--SE/ l,L-,!/ ) , 5-h · 0~1-ls/ck rv---ra ~4' r; #1; k ficr,-,.7 jJ, n l'--7' <vlfV (V ~ :.p ,,,...,,.e.,,, r ';l 1./. we lv I re e a/ v-e :5 . ;::;-0 ,if>7 Please complete this form and return iMiy A ril 30, 003 to the address below. If you have questions TO,,. L /7,fff/,. q, regarding these proposals, please call me at (206) 296-7167. Thank you. '-/1~ 5..;,.,La-,Jr" / King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATTN: Kim Claussen, ProjecUProgram Manager Ill goo Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 pi v ~;Jou d »,,rl~ Sf. 14/-s: "v 1 1/ A/ ;4/;{ g-110 /fl}-f SF h;rs S l/4e As s;r-fe wlf-!I< w!ffs c;rr-_ Form96/SPRS/ReqSchol.Inf clc 1/6/2000 ' PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LIBERTY GROVE .q~~ \. 11,,1, ~O, ~ · '·,3 v~ Permit Approval Conditions Document Fire System Review ~ 171\i, o <a '-<) c::,:..~~,c-.c-,v,<! C'o VJ Tracking Number: L03P0006 G'~ ~1')': 'y'"-::;:::~ep,q,t The following conditions apply to the Fire Engineering approval of the above refere ed preliminary plat: AA02 MUDD Any questions regarding the fire review of this plan should be directed to: Bill Mudd, Fire Engineer Telephone: (206) 296-6785. FHOI FIRE HYDRANT WATERMAIN PERMITS A separate permit is required for the installation of water mains and/or fire hydrants. Submit three (3) copies of drawings and specifications to DDES Building Services Division Permit Service Center for a permit application. Review and approval by Fire Engineering Section is required prior to installation. Plans shall include, but are not limited to; pipe sizes, pipe type, valves/fittings, thrust blocks and/or rodding and material listings. Fire hydrants shall be installed per K.C.C. Title 17 Watermains shall be installed and tested per AWWA standards and/or NFPA#24 (STANDARDS FOR PRIVATE FIRE HYDRANTS AND WATERMAINS); as applicable. Ref. 1001.4 UFC NOTE: UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED, ANY WATERMAIN OR FIRE HYDRANT DETAILS ON BUILDING PLANS/ORA WINGS HA VE NOT BEEN REVIEWED OR APPROVED. FH74 PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL Preliminary Fire Engineering approval has been granted based upon the following information provided. To obtain final Fire Engineering approval, the following item(s) must be submitted, reviewed and approved: I. Certificate of Water Availability. (Provided by appropriate water purveyor). Valid one year from date of signature. Minimum acceptance flow shall be 1000 gallons per minute at 20 pounds per square inch residual pressure. II. Three copies of plans indicating: A. Fire hydrant(s) location -measured by vehicular travel distance. (K.C.C. Title 17) Residential 1. 700 ft. maximum spacing. 2. Not more than 350 ft. from each lot. B. Watermain placement (K.C.C. Title 17) I. Source (i.e.) supply connection. Fire Systems Review Approval Conditions Page I of2 MAIN FILE COPv . ' 2. Main sizes identified. C. Fire access roads Ref. UFC 902.2 1. Minimum 20 ft. wide unobstructed -13 '6" vertical clearance, unobstructed. All-weather surface, able to withstand 25 tons. 2. Fire access roads in excess of 150 feet (dead-ends), must have a tum-around area. Required tum-arounds must be a minimum 80-foot diameter. 3. Fire access roads must provide 20-foot minimum inside turning radius and 40 outside turning radius when said roads change direction. 4. Fire access roads shall not exceed 15% grade. 5. The required width of any fire apparatus access road shall not be obstructed in any manner, including parking of vehicles. Minimum required widths and clearances established under this section shall be maintained at all times. D. Marking when required, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads and prohibit the obstruction thereof or both. Ref. UFC 902.2 FH77 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL Final plat approval requires an inspection and approval of the fire hydrant and water main installation by a King County Fire Inspector, prior to recording. Call (206)296-6615; after a permit to install has bee obntained from DDES; Fire Protection Engineering. Fire Systems Review Approval Conditions Page 2 of2 King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 DATE: March 27. 2003 TO: Issaquah School District, ATTN: ___ _ FM: Kim Claussen. Project/Program Manager Ill RE: Proposed Plats of Liberty Grove & Lib?~ontiguous & Rezone Request_ LUSD File Nos: L03P0005, ~L03TY401 The Land Use Services Division (LUSD) has received an application for a subdivision in your District. Enclosed is a copy of the plat maps received by the Land Use Services Division on March 11, 2003. In order for us to adequately evaluate this proposal, provide the most accurate information to the public, and for LUSD to serve the School District better, please provide us with the following information: Which schools do you anticipate the students living in this subdivision would attend? Jr. High/Middle. _ _,(_'_,_(~'-._.)"" .. '"-/ -,-'-"1-"i-'-:'-'-;'-, ---'-'·'c..• ______ ,,..._ __ \_. ~--"'-·-- these schools]_1 . Elementary -C'-'vU' f;, U~~ s-.,,. iv ,__f,k ,~ S IAJ.,Lfl 'f1" 1 Jr. High/Middle 0{5 J d-,,...e_ ~ CA.~ tv #--tK "~ 1 r, ,iJt w , . I _;. . ./ 1\.2 S(l},.. 1 :~ -,J, Sr. High /;w sS:eeL '---().,(/,..,{ n c~ lv ,4-/Kwt~ !'!1 j !fl'[ ;fi ijf ie students will be bussed, where do you anticipate the bus stops will be locate~. If that information 1s not /1,' q._~"' available at this time, currently, where are the clo,s.est bus stops l1>cated to this site? 1 L u-,,-. s ,,_,,, . /O'f [,/ tJi /5{:,-rp. /11=.S li. Ol S t. I Lj ;:5:')'o'f /-'O°tb/l,uls£4'si.1 a«.e_ f o ___, J · -4°Elementary /'Sb M.D~r::. t-~ '5 '<'-1'?12.(.1'.-f-s, l/.(;>-1;Alqs·l@ SUl.ftdv "-/(<.~ ~ 111 ~Jr.High/Middle J1,,z.l't,tf11UJ ~-'co @ S·t-I 30'1.lls,--f,sgt'Allffri; iP S"t,l3i&·W --}(;;/:Sr. High flOef' /1,,3r./ {tt/£ S· £. ~, C ~ 1?0-tli pl Other Comments: U,;/!..?r.,. / 6 (} ch.. 4'-N' SE ~ (Z, ~ ?i.i 7/ /(: k/ #/ --¥ 'JN xsS::9t<-.J\ hsf-.r,·c r tv,1/ /r;;)K ?Lf h//v1.1/ S'-;f/a{,--.J_ J . L -~ y 1° &f::_ h Ci (11(5 SA>f' ci,L 2&vv /':[/r f?L ~ SE/SL//) , t9v,,/s/t'h7 ~-ra0<f~ Pz;k fic.rn 7 D ,--11'--r l,Vl]l) (V G /.p -..,., y ';1 1.,{ we iv, £ e G!_,/ V -e :5 /--u,., I cl/// Please complete this form and return it-lS'y A 003 to the address below. If you have questions Ti,,.. 1_ P'-f)f/ ...,_ c. regarding these proposals, please call me at (206) 296-7167. Thank you. "-/1~ 5..;,, o..,.::/r / .. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATTN: Kim Claussen, Project/Program Manager Ill 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Form96/SPRS/Reqschol.Inf clc 1/6/2000 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 April 8, 2003 Wayne Jones Lakeridge Development PO Box 146 Renton, WA 98057 RE: Notice of Incomplete Application DDES File Nos. L03P0006 -Liberty Grove Dear Mr. Jones The purpose of this letter is to notify you that on April 8, 2003, the Land Use Services Division determined that the above-referenced application is incomplete under the current requirements for a complete application as specified in King County Code 20.20 and 19A.08. This initial determination is intended to be used only for the purposes of applying the time period established in the King County Code. The following information is needed for this application to be considered complete. Fees: Submit the appropriate submittal fees or request a waiver of submittal requirements. Certificate of Sewer Availability: Submit an updated certificate of sewer availability from the City of Renton. The initial letter submitted is dated April 5, 2002. Rezone: It appears that a rezone from R-6 to R-4 is proposed. A separate rezone application is required for this proposal. Either revise the plat to comply with the existing zoning or submit a second rezone request/application along with the associated fees. Please note, that subdivision applications associated with rezone requests are not vested until such time as a final decision has been issued on the rezone. Land Use Services Division will keep your application "on hold" pending receipt of the above information, during which time no further review will take place. Pursuant to King County King Code 20, if the requested information is not received within 90 days from the date of this letter (July 8, 2003), your application will be canceled. No time extensions will be granted. Should the application be canceled, you will be required to submit a new application. MAIN FILE COPY If you have any questions about the information requested, please contact Karen Scharer, Project/Program Manager at (206) 296-7114. Sincerely, ~,q~ Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division cc: DPM Engineering Greg Borba, Supervisor, Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division Karen Scharer, Planner, Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division Bruce Whittaker, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Application file ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 May 15, 2003 Wayne Jones Lakeridge Development PO Box 146 Renton, WA 98057 RE: Notice of Complete Application for Application of Time Periods Application No. L03TY403 / Date Filed: May 7, 2003 Application No. L03P0006 / Date Filed: March 11, 2003 Dear Mr. Jones: The purpose of this letter is to notify you that on May 15, 2003, the Land Use Services Division determined that the above-referenced application is complete under current requirements for a complete application, as the 14 day period for review of additional information submitted has lapsed. This initial determination is intended only for the purpose of applying the time periods for permit processing specified in Ordinance 12196. Our goal is to process your application within 120 days. However, the complexity and level of analysis required to review your project and available staff resources will affect the actual review time. One or more of the following can also impact the timeline: • any request made by the Division for additional information • changes or revisions requested by the applicant • mutually-agreed-upon requests to stop the time clock • preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement • resolution ofland use decisions appeals Once review of the legal description and legal lot status for the site is complete, we will notify you whether further documentation is needed. If you have any questions about your application, please contact me at (206) 296-7114 or e-mail at karen.scharer@metrokc.gov. Sincerely, c:t5:::,l. YPM II Current Planning Section Land Use Services Division cc: Application File MAIN FILE COPY ® King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 DATE: March 27, 2003 TO: Issaquah School District, ATTN: ___ _ FM: Kim Claussen. P[Qject/Program Manager m ~ RE: Proposed Plats of Liberty Grove & Liberty Grove Contiguous & Rezone Request_ LUSD File Nos: L03P0005, L03P0006 & L03TY401 The Land Use Services Division (LUSD) has received an application for a subdivision in your District. Enclosed is a copy of the plat maps received by the Land Use Services Division on March 11, 2003. In order for us to adequately evaluate this proposal, provide the most accurate information to the public, and for LUSD to serve the School District better, please provide us with the following information: Which schools do you anticipate the students living in this subdivision would attend? Elementary _________________________ _ Jr. High/Middle ______________________ _ Sr. High'-------------------------- Will the students walk or be bussed to these schools? Elementary _________________________ _ Jr. High/Middle, ______________________ _ Sr. High __________________________ _ If the students will be bussed, where do you anticipate the bus stops will be located? If that Information is not available at this time, currently, where are the closest bus stops located to this site? Elementary ________________________ _ Jr. High/Middle. _____________________ _ Sr. High __________________________ _ Other Comments: __________________________ _ Please complete this form and return it by April 30, 2003 to the address below. If you have questions regarding these proposals, please call me at (206) 296-7167. Thank you. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division ATIN: Kim Claussen, Project/Program Manager Ill 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Form96/SPRS/Reqschol.Inf· clc 1/6/2000 MAIN FILE COPY /y\ REPORT AND DECISION OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 400 Yesler Way, Room 404 Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 296-4660 Facsimile (206) 296-1654 February 4, 2004 SUBJECT: Department of Development and Environmental Services file nos. L01P0016A and L03RE038 Proposed Ordinance No. 2003-0490 EVENDELL Preliminary Plat Revision and Proposal for Transfer of Density Credits Location: Lying South of Southeast 136th Street, between 156th Avenue Southeast And 160th Avenue Southeast Applicant: U.S. Land Development Association/Centurion, represented by Michael Romano 22617 -8th Drive Southeast Bothell, Washington 98021 Telephone: (425) 486-2563 Facsimile: (425) 486-3273 King County: Land Use Services Division, represented by Karen Scharer 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Telephone: (206) 296-7114 Facsimile: (206) 296-7055 SUMMARY OF DECISION/RECOMMENDATION: Department's Preliminary Recommendation: Department's Final Recommendation: Examiner's Decision: Approve, subject to conditions Approve, subject to conditions (modified) Approve, subject to conditions (modified) EXAMINER PROCEEDINGS: Hearing Opened: Hearing Closed: January 22, 2004 January 22, 2004 LOIPOOl6A & L03RE038-Evendell Revision Page 2 of21 Participants at the public hearing and the exhibits offered and entered are listed in the attached minutes. A verbatim recording of the hearing is available in the office of the King County Hearing Examiner. ISSUES/TOPICS ADDRESSED: , Transfer of density credits , Road improvements , Safe walking conditions , Wetland buffer averaging , Tree protection SUMMARY: Application for approval of transfer of20 density credits and revision of a preliminary plat, to subdivide 12.43 acres into 70 lots in the urban area, is granted preliminary approval. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: I. General Information: Owner: Representative: Location: Section/Township/Range: Acreage Plat: Zoning: Number of Lots: Density: Lot Size: Proposed Use: Sewage Disposal: Water Supply: U.S. Land Development Association P.O. Box 22200 Seattle, WA 98122 Michael Romano Centurion Development Services 22617 8th Dr. SE, Bothell, WA 98021 Phone: 425-486-2563 Facsimile: (425) 486-3273 e-mail: Michael.romano@yerizon.net Lying south of SE 136th Street between 156th Avenue SE and 160th Avenue SE. SE 14-23-05 12.43 acres R-4 Parcels # 142305 9022 & 9009 Proposed: 70 (previously approved: 46) 5.6 dwellings per acre 3,900 to 6,600 square feet single family City of Renton Water District #90 •· L01P00I6A & L03RE038-Evendell Revision Fire District: King County Fire District# 25 School Districts: Renton & Issaquah Community Plan: Newcastle Drainage Subbasin: Lower Cedar River King County Permits: Subdivision Complete Application Date: October 27, 2003 Threshold Determination: Mitigated Determination ofNonsignificance (MDNS) Date oflssuance: December 23, 2002 (Adoption Notice Nov. I 0, 2003) Page 3 of21 KC Permit Contact: Karen Scharer, Project Manager II, Current Planning Section, LUSD Phone # 296-7114 or e-mail at karen.scharer@metrokc.gov 2. Except as modified below, the facts set forth in the King County Land Use Services Division's preliminary report to the Hearing Examiner for the January 22, 2004, public hearing are found to be correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. Said report is exhibit no. 60a in the hearing record. 3. Directly north, east and south of the eastern 11 acres of the subject property (proposed lot nos. 12-70) are three parcels proposed to be subdivided pursuant to the R-4 wning classification. Those parcels are the subject ofDDES application nos. L03P0006 (Liberty Grove), L03P0005 (Liberty Grove Contiguous) and L03POOl5 (Nichols Place). The adjacent property to the west is developed with single-family residences on larger lots. There is no currently proposed or anticipated development of the property to the west. 4. King County's "Transfer of Development Rights (TOR)" program is governed by Chapter 21A.37 of the King County Code. The TDR program establishes a property right which is separable from the fee-simple title to certain lands within King County, and provides a method for the transfer and utilization of that new right, which is colloquially known as a development right or "density credit." A density credit has a substantial market value. The underlying purpose of the TDR program is to allow for the movement of residential density from rural areas to urban areas of King County. The code is intended to provide," ... an efficient and streamlined administrative review system to ensure that transfers of development rights to receiving sites are evaluated in a timely way and balanced with other County goals and policies, and are adjusted to the specific conditions of each receiving site." KCC 21A.37.0I 0.2. Receiving sites are required to meet the provisions ofKCC 21A.37.030. Those requirements are that the receiving site: I. be within an unincorporated urban area, zoned R-4 or higher, or be within a potential annexation area; 2. be within a city where new growth is or will be encouraged, and where facilities and services exist or public investments in facilities and services will be made; or 3. be within RA-2.5 and RA-5 zoned parcels, subject to stringent criteria. The subject property is within the first category of eligible receiving sites listed in KCC 21A.37.030. Sites within the unincorporated urban growth area are not required to have • L01P0016A & L03RE038-Evendell Revision Page 4 of21 any specific level of available facilities and services. Development approvals that utilize density credits must meet only those service criteria that apply generally to development of the number of dwelling units proposed on the site. King County Code chapter 21A.12 governs densities and development standards in residential zones. The R-4 zone in the urban residential area allows for a maximum density of six dwelling units per acre, which may be achieved only through the application of residential density incentives or transfers of development rights. KCC 21A.12.030.A. and B.l. When density credits are used, development shall comply with dimensional standards of the zone having a base density most comparable to the total approved density. KCC 21A.37.030.B. 5. The foregoing provisions of the King County Zoning Code are generally consistent with policies of the King County Comprehensive Plan governing residential land use. In particular, the Zoning Code provisions are generally consistent with: Policy U-113, that new residential development in the Urban Growth Area should occur where facilities and services can be provided at the lowest public cost and in a timely fashion; Policy U-114, that the County seek to achieve an average zoning density of at least seven to eight homes per acre in the Urban Growth Area through a mix of densities, allowing for lower density zones to recognize existing subdivisions with little or no opportunity for infill or redevelopment; Policy U-122 that supports increases in urban density through a rezone or a proposal to utilize density transfer, when the proposal will help resolve traffic, utility, parks or open space deficiencies in the immediate neighborhood. This proposal will improve traffic circulation in the area, will extend sewer service further into the urban area, and will provide recreation facilities and open space available to future residents on the subject property. Comprehensive Plan Policy U-120 addresses zoning changes to increase density, and is not material to this application for use of density credits consistent with the existing zone classification. Likewise, policy U-121 applies to the evaluation ofrezone requests, and is not material to this application. 6. DDES and the Applicant have agreed upon right-of-way dedications and road improvements to mitigate the impacts of traffic which the Applicant's proposal will generate adjacent to and in the immediate vicinity of the proposed development. The dedications and improvements include additional right-of-way and construction on Southeast 136th Street, from 156th Avenue Southeast to 160th Avenue Southeast, and shoulder improvements along the site frontage of 160th Avenue Southeast. 7. In order to provide safe walking conditions for students from this subdivision who will walk to school, improvements are necessary along existing right-of-way or upon right-of-way anticipated to become available through the development of subdivisions to the east of the subject property. The existing available right-of-way that can accommodate children walking to school is on 160th LOJPOOJ6A & LOJRE038-Evendel1 Revision Page 5 of2! Avenue Southeast to Southeast 135th Street, then east to 166th Avenue Southeast, and then south to the north boundary of the Liberty High School property. Alternatively, a route within future right-of-way may become available along Southeast 1361h Street east from 160th Avenue Southeast to 162nd Avenue Southeast, then south to "5-lot subdivision" ( a.k.a. Dickenson Plat), that would enable a connection to the southwest comer of the Liberty High School property. Improvements to either route could accomplish the provision of safe walking conditions for students who will walk to school from the subject property. 8. Removal of trees from this or other property being developed commonly subjects trees on adjacent properties to stress and increases the windthrow hazard. Trees that remain in an area which is substantially cleared present an increased risk to persons and property on and off-the site of the remaining trees. There is no King County regulation applicable to the subject property that restricts clearing or tree removal to protect trees on adjacent properties from increased stress or risk ofwindthrow. The environmental review of this proposal did not identify impacts of clearing or tree removal as a significant adverse environmental impact of the proposal. 9. The Applicant's proposal includes wetland buffer averaging to enable proposed road construction and possibly facilitate lot development. The area shown for the provision of additional buffer to mitigate impacts oflost buffer is in the northeast comer of the plat, adjacent to 160th Avenue Southeast and Southeast 136th Street. Replacement buffer is proposed at approximately a 2: 1 ratio to lost buffer area. This would provide additional protection to the class 2 wetland, as required by KCC 2IA.24.320.B. CONCLUSIONS: I. If approved subject to the conditions recommended below, the proposed subdivision will comply with the goals and objectives of the King County Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision and Zoning Codes, and other official land use controls and policies of King County. 2. If approved subject to the conditions recommended below, this proposed subdivision will make appropriate provision for the public health, safety and general welfare and for open spaces, for drainage ways, streets, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supply, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and safe walking conditions for students who only walk to school; and it will serve the public use and interest. 3. The conditions for final plat approval recommended below are in the public interest and are reasonable requirements to mitigate the impacts of this development upon the environment. 4. The dedications ofland or easements within and adjacent to the proposed plat, as recommended by the conditions for final plat approval or as shown on the proposed preliminary plat submitted by the Applicant, are reasonable and necessary as a direct result of the development of this proposed plat, and are proportionate to the impacts of the development. 5. This proposal is subject to the mitigated determination of environmental non-significance issued December 23, 2002 and adopted November 10, 2003. There was no appeal of the MDNS or of its adoption for this proposal. Therefore, the conditions of that MONS must be implemented as conditions of this preliminary plat approval. LOJ P0016A & L03RE038 -Evendell Revision Page 6 of21 The conditions of the MDNS reqnire substantial downstream drainage improvements (see condition no. 19). Culvert and channel improvements required in the east drainage basin for a distance approximately I, 700 downstream from the plat, together with the change in flow volume resulting from development of the subject property, should be analyzed by the Applicant and reviewed by DDES to determine the impacts, if any, downstream from the improvements. Any such impacts should be addressed if it is necessary to do so to prevent flooding or other damage from occurring as a consequence of the required improvements. 6. The Applicant has negotiated for the purchase of 20 development rights, which would allow for an increase in the number of lots to be developed on the subject property to a total of 70. This development will be within the maximum density of6 dwelling units per acre permitted in the R- 4 zone classification in the urban area, although it will be most comparable to the base density of the R-6 zone classification. The proposed development of the subject property, utilizing 20 density rights, is consistent with all applicable development standards and other provisions of the King County Code. 7. The road improvements proposed and agreed to by the Applicant, including those shown in the 70-lot preliminary plat revision received October I, 2003, as modified by the conditions recommended below, will reasonably mitigate the impacts of traffic generated by the proposed development. Due to the diversion of substantial additional traffic to the east leg of the intersection of Southeast 136th Street and 156th Avenue Southeast, substantial improvements to that intersection are necessary, and have been agreed to by the Applicant. 8. Safe walking conditions for children who walk to school from the subject property will be provided by using one of the alternatives for improvements incorporated into this proposal, set forth in finding no. 7 and reflected in the conditions of final plat approval. 9. There is no applicable provision of the King County Code to restrict the removal of trees in the course of the development of the subject property, or to protect trees on neighboring properties from increased stress and risk of windthrow. I 0. The proposed wetland mitigation, and buffer averaging for the class 2 wetland at an approximate 2: I ratio for replacement buffer, meet the requirements of the King County code. The proposed replacement buffer area gives additional protection to the wetland. DECISION: The preliminary plat revision ofEvendell, as received October I, 2003, is APPROVED, subject to the following conditions for final plat approval: I. Compliance with all platting provisions of Title 19 of the King County Code. 2. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final plat a dedication which includes the language set forth in King County Council Motion No. 5952. 3. a. The plat shall comply with the maximum density (and minimum density) requirements of the R-4 zone classification. All lots shall meet the minimum dimensional requirements of the LO 1 POO 16A & L03RE038 -Evendell Revision Page 7 of2J R-6 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary plat, whichever is larger, except that minor revisions to the plat which do not result in substantial changes may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services. b. The Applicant shall provide transfer of density credit documentation to DDES prior to final approval to allow transfer of a maximum of 20 density credits to achieve a maximum of 70 lots on the subject property, 4. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the King County Road Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No. 11187, as amended (I 993 KCRS), subject to any variances that may be approved by the King County Road Engineer. 5. A Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) shall be completed prior to final plat approval to except from the plat that portion of the 200 (approximate) feet on the far west that is not part of the proposed plat. Documentation demonstrating the resolution of boundary issues with the property to the south (Nichols Place) also shall be provided to DDES. 6. The Applicant must obtain the approval from the King County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main, and fire flow standards of Chapter 17 .08 of the King County Code. Joint Use Development Tract Has shown on the plat will provide access to Lots 28 and 29. Additionally, it is a future emergency vehicle access tract to and from 160th Avenue SE, which the Applicant proposes to create in response to concerns raised by the City of Renton. The Applicant shall include proposed protocols for the construction and maintenance of Tract H, plus any related plat notes, with its engineering plans submittal, meeting the following standards: The emergency vehicle access to 160th Avenue SE shall have a minimum driving surface width of 20 feet, with an all-weather surface capable of supporting 25 tons. Any locking device shall be approved by the Renton Fire Department (KCFD # 25). Chains, cable or bollards will not be permitted. The gate shall be located at least 50 feet from 160th Avenue SE to allow space for fire apparatus to stop while opening the gate or to wait before entering the public roadway. If these conditions are not met any future residence constructed on Lots 28 and 29 will have to be sprinklered NFP A 13 D. These requirements concerning adequate fire and emergency access may be modified in a manner approved by the King County Fire Protection Engineer and King County Fire District no. 25. 7. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location oflots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. LOIP0016A & L03RE038-Evendell Revision Page 8 of22 a. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual and applicable updates adopted by King County. DDES approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. b. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by DDES Engineering Review, shall be shown on the engineering plans. c. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: "All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings# on file with DDES and/or the King County Department of Transportation. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots that are designated for individual lot infiltration systems, the systems shall be constructed at the time of the building permit and shall comply with plans on file." d. The stormwater detention design shall comply with the Level 2 or Level 3 Flow Control requirements, as applicable, per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). (See SEPA conditions in condition no. 19.) e. The storm water control facility shall be located in a separate tract and dedicated to King County unless portions of the drainage tract are used for required recreation space in accordance with KCC 21A.14.180. 8. Drainage adjustment L02V0024 is approved for this project. All conditions of approval for this adjustment shall be met upon submittal of the engineering plans. 9. A drainage easement for the conveyance from the Tract N drainage facility to 156"' Ave SE shall be provided upon engineering plan submittal. 10. The following road improvements are required to be constructed according to the 1993 King County Road Standards (KCRS): a. The internal access road from SE 136"' Street to the beginning of the internal loop road shall be improved to the urban subcollector standard, except that portion on the west side between Lot 11 and Lot 12 is not required to be improved with a sidewalk. b. The internal loop road shall be improved to the urban subaccess road standard with sidewalks on the outside frontage of the loop road. c. SE 136"' Street (frontage and offsite) shall be dedicated, designed and improved in general conformance with the Preliminary Road Improvement Plan received 3/26/2002 with the Plat ofEvendell: LO I POO I 6A & L03RE038 -Evendell Revision Page 9of22 The frontage from 158th Ave NE to 160th Ave NE shall be improved to the urban one-half street standard. Eighteen feet of additional right-of way shall be dedicated for this improvement. SE 136th Street frontage from the west side of J.U.D.T. 'A' boundary to 158th Ave NE shall be improved to the urban neighborhood collector standard; EXCEPT that no sidewalk construction is required on the north side. Twenty feet of additional right-of-way shall be dedicated for this improvement. SE 136th Street from 1561h Ave SE to J.U.D.T. 'A' shall be improved to the urban neighborhood collector standard; EXCEPT that no sidewalk construction is required on the north side. Twenty-six feet of additional right-of-way shall be provided for this improvement. An additional 25-foot right-of-way radius is required at the southeast comer of 156th Ave SE and SE 136th Street. Striping for a second westbound lane shall be provided within the 150-foot widened section approaching 156th Avenue SE, in a manner to be worked out at the time of submission of engineering plans. d. 160'" Ave SE FRONTAGE: The 160th Ave SE frontage shall be improved with an 8-foot paved shoulder on the west side. Adequate provisions for road drainage shall be provided. e. Tracts A,C,F,G,H, and I shall be improved to the joint use driveway standard per Section 3.01 of the KCRS. Tract A shall include an easement to King County for the maintenance of the Tract N drainage facility. Tract A shall be owned and maintained by the owners of Lots I and 2. f. Tracts B, D and E shall be improved to the private access tract standard per Section 2.09 of theKCRS. g. The Applicant shall revise the channelization that has been constructed in conjunction with the plat of Highland Estates (LOOP0009). These modifications to the channelization shall incorporate a revision of the current proposed painted 'island' to a southbound left tum lane with at least 60 feet of storage for left turning vehicles to (a) encourage the use of 156th Avenue SE in lieu of 158th Avenue SE and 160th Avenue SE, and (b) mitigate the potential deficient condition that would result from southbound left turning vehicles making left turns from the southbound through lane, or using the painted island as a deceleration and refuge area while waiting for gaps in northbound traffic. Channelization and illumination plans must be submitted to King County Traffic Engineering Section for review and approval of the tum lane channelization. Modifications to the above road conditions may be considered according to the variance provisions in Section 1.08 of the KCRS. 11. There shall be no direct vehicular access to or from 160th A venue SE from those lots which abut this street. A note to this effect shall appear on the engineering plans and final plat. L01POOI6A & L03RE038-Evendell Revision Page l0of22 12. All utilities within proposed rights-of-way must be included within a franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final plat recording. 13. The Applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by the applicable fee ordinance. The Applicant has the option to either: (I) pay the MPS fee at final plat recording, or (2) pay the MPS fee at the time of building pennit issuance. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the plat that reads, "All fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), have been paid." If the second option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of building permit application. 14. The proposed subdivision shall comply with the Sensitive Areas Code as outlined in KCC 21A.24. Preliminary plat review has identified the following specific requirements that apply to this project. All other applicable requirements from KCC 21A.24 shall also be addressed by the Applicant. a. This site contains a Class 2 wetland. The majority of the wetland will be protected from alteration during and after construction, with a 50-foot wide buffer around the wetland boundary. An additional I 5-foot building setback is required beyond the edge of the buffer. b. A maximum of 200 square feet of wetland will be filled for construction of SE I 36th Street. Mitigation shall consist of at least 400 square feet of wetland enhancement to degraded portions of the existing wetland. c. Road improvements for SE I 36th Street and I 60th Avenue SE will eliminate 6,989 square feet of wetland buffer. Mitigation shall consist of providing replacement buffer in the northeast portion of the site at approximately a 2: 1 ratio to provide additional protection for the wetland pursuant to KCC 21A.24.320B. Reduced impact will result in reduced mitigation. d. The proposed sewer main within the SE 136th Street right-of-way will intrude into the wetland buffer along with the road improvements. In order to protect wetland hydrology: (I) the sewer line shall be installed during the dry season (June through September), and (2) the design shall incorporate the use of pipe bed darns ofbentonite or other material at intervals to preclude draining possible subsurface water flows through the gravel pipe bedding. e. Downstream drainage improvements to existing culverts and stormwater conveyances required through the SEP A MONS shall cause no adverse alteration to existing wetlands or streams in the vicinity of the drainage improvements. f. Critical Areas staff shall review engineering plans for the plat and sewer main for conformance with these requirements. I 5. The following note shall be shown on the final engineering plan and recorded plat: LOIP0016A & L03RE038-Evende11 Revision RESTRICTIONS FOR SENSITIVE AREA TRACTS AND SENSITIVE AREAS AND BUFFERS Page II of22 Dedication of a sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the tract/sensitive area and buffer. This interest includes the preservation of native vegetation for all purposes that benefit the public health, safety and welfare, including control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the land subject to the tract/sensitive area and buffer the obligation, enforceable on behalf of the public by King County, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the tract/sensitive area and buffer. The vegetation within the tract/sensitive area and buffer may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged without approval in writing from the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services or its successor agency, unless otherwise provided by law. The common boundary between the tract/sensitive area and buffer and the area of development activity must be marked or otherwise flagged to the satisfaction of King County prior to any clearing, grading, building construction or other development activity on a lot subject to the sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer. The required marking or flagging shall remain in place until all development proposal activities in the vicinity of the sensitive area are completed. _ No building foundations are allowed beyond the required 15-foot building setback line, unless otherwise provided by law. 16. Suitable recreation space shall be provided consistent with the requirements KCC 21A.14.180 and KCC 21A.14.190 in providing sport court[s], children's play equipment, picnic table[s], benches, etc .. a. A detailed recreation space plan (i.e., landscape specs, equipment specs, etc.) shall be submitted for review and approval by DDES and King County Parks prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the engineering plans. This plan shall comply with Ordinance# 14045. b. A perforrnance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording of the plat 17. A homeowners' association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction ofDDES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the recreation, open space and/or sensitive area tract(s). 18. Street trees shall be included in the design of all road improvements, and shall comply with Section 5.03 oftheKCRS and KCC 2IA.16.050: a. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. LOIP0016A & L03RE038-Evendell Revision Page 12 of22 b. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. c. If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. d. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the County has adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. e. The species of trees shall be approved by DDES iflocated within the right-of-way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. f. The Applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by DDES prior to engineering plan approval. g. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DDES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. A landscape inspection fee shall also be submitted prior to plat recording. The inspection fee is subject to change based on current County fees. 19. The following have been established by SEPA as necessary requirements to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of this development. The Applicants shall demonstrate compliance with these items prior to final approval. a. East Drainage Basin: The 160th Ave SE downstream conveyance system shall be upgraded to provide for the I 00- year storm capacity. Downstream driveway culverts/ditches and a cross-culvert under 1601h Avenue SE shall be improved as follows: Culverts P-117 and P-116 on the west side of 1601h Avenue SE, cross-culvert P-115, and culverts P-114 and P-113 on the east side of1601h A venue SE shall be improved as needed. The culvert designations are according to the Level 3 Downstream Drainage Analysis by Haozous Engineering dated August 26, 2002. To address a related localized flooding condition, bank and channel stabilization are also required in the unopened right-of-way for 162nd Avenue SE, in the vicinity of the easterly line of Lot 12, Rich Lea Crest (address 16046 SE 142•• Street). It is estimated that stabilizing and L01P0016A & L03RE038-Evendell Revision Page 13 of21 re-grading approximately 50 to I 00 feet of channel, east of 16046 SE 142"" Street, will be adequate to resolve flooding that has occurred in the past location. The culverts and channel described are located from the south site boundary to a distance of approximately I ,700 feet downstream. Level 2 Flow Control design is required for the proposed storrnwater detention facility. A factor of safety of 5 to I 5 percent, determined by the design engineer, shall be required for detention storage volumes. b. West Drainage Basin: The storrnwater detention facilities shall be designed to the Level 3 Flow Control Standard as described in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). As an option, Level 2 Flow Control with downstream improvements can be proposed according to Core Requirement 2 of the KCSWDM. The nrinimum Flow Control Standard shall be Level 2. A factor of safety of 5 to 15 percent, determined by the design engineer, shall be required for detention storage volumes. The downstream impacts of the I, 700 feet of conveyance improvements shall be reviewed by the developer's engineer, and any recommendations necessary to prevent flooding or other damage from occurring as a consequence of the required conveyance improvements shall be included with the plans for review by DDES. School Mitigation Fees 20. Lots within this subdivision east of 158"' Avenue SE are subject to King County Code 21A.43, which imposes impact fees to fund school system improvements needed to serve new development. As a condition of final approval, fifty percent (50%) of the impact fees due for the plat shall be assessed and collected immediately prior to recording, using the fee schedules in effect when the plat receives final approval. The balance of the assessed fee shall be allocated evenly to the dwelling units in the plat and shall be collected prior to building permit issuance. School Walkways 21. A pedestrian access easement between 158"' Place SE and 160"' Avenue SE shall be provided over either Tract Hor L (as shown in Exhibit 62). The easement shall have a nrinimum 10 foot width and be improved with a 5 foot wide paved surface. 22. The Applicant, individually or in conjunction with other developers, shall construct an off-site walkway to Liberty High school from the site. The walkway shall be constructed within the right-of-way from 160th Ave SE, east along SE 135th Streetto 166th Ave SE, and south to Liberty High School at SE 136th Street, or via alternative right-of-way and easements that become available and are approved by DDES. One acceptable alternative would be to use future right-of-way of Southeast 136th Street and 162nd Avenue Southeastto connect with the sidewalk improvement of"five lot subdivision," and through the plat of"five lot subdivision"/LOOP0023 to the southwest gate of Liberty High School. The walkway shall be designed and constructed in L01P0016A & L03RE038-Even.dell Revision Page 14 of22 accordance with the 1993 King County Road Standards and shown on the engineering plans for DOES review and approval. Any surfacing alternative from the King County Road Standards (KCRS 3.09) may be submitted for approval through a road variance application. ORDERED this 4th day of February, 2004. TRANSMITfED this 4th day of February, 2004, to the following parties and interested persons of record: 4Creeks UAC Scott D. Baker Marshall Brenden Attn: Claudia Donnelly 7018 47th Ave. NE 18225 SE I 28th P.O. Box 3501 Seattle WA 98115 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98056 Ronda Bryant Marilyn Carlson Ronald Coffin 15406 SE 13 6th Street 13616 -156th Avae. SE 16015 SE 135th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059-6828 Michael Rae Cooke Mark Costello Robert Darrow 13125158th Ave. SE 13012 158th Avenue SE Haozous Engineering Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 13428 -45th Court Mukilteo WA 98275 Shirlene Day Roger Dorstad Kathy Graves 14412 -167th Pl. SE Evergreen East Realty 13020 -160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 PO Box 375 Renton WA 98059 Redmond WA 98073 Michelle Hagerman Stephen & Yvonne Hanson Valerie Hemnes 13710 156th Ave. SE 15611 SE 138th Pl. 15627 SE 139th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059-7422 Victor & Gwendolyn High Edward & June Hill Edward & Nancy Hilton 13405 -158th Ave. SE 13527 156th St SE 13414-158th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Kurt Hughes Fred & Helga Jaques Leonard J. Johnston 19112 NE 146th Way 13114-158thAve. SE 16016 SE 135th Woodinville WA 98072-6361 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 LOIP0016A & LOJRE038-Evendell Revision Diane Kazele 15657 SE 137th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Lakeridge Development Inc. Attn: Wayne Jones Jr. P.O. Box 146 Renton WA 98057-0146 Rebecca Lind City of Renton, EDNSP 1055 S. Grady Way Renton WA 98056 Fred & Gloria Martin 13019 • 160thAve. SE Renton WA 98059 Bill Mokin 14404 • 162nd Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 John Nanney 16169 SE 146th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Gary Norris Gary Struthers & Associates 3150 Richards Road # I 00 Bellevue WA 98005 Richard & Anita Oliphant 16519SE 145thSt. Renton WA 98059 David Rockabrand Four Creeks UAC 11427 162nd Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Geneva Scholes 12924 • 158th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Don & Diane Kezele 15657 SE 137th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Joann Lee 13802 -160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Steve Lyman 14505 -160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Linda Matlock WA State Ecol. DeptJWQSW Unit POBox47696 Olympia WA 98504-7696 Eleanor Moon KC Executive Horse Council 12230 NE 61st Kirkland WA 9803 3 Kathy Nelson Transportation Dept 805 -2nd Ave. S. Issaquah WA 98027 Florence Nott 15915 SE 134th Pl. Renton WA 98059-6832 David Petrie 811 S. 273rd Ct. DesMoines WA 98198 Marsha Rollinger 15646 SE 138th Pl. Renton WA 98059 Curtis Schuster KBSIII,LLC 12320 NE 8th St, Ste. 100 Bellevue WA 98005 Page 15of22 Duana Kolouskova Johns Monroe Mitsunga PLLC 1500-l 14th Avenue SE, #102 Bellevue WA 98004 Tim & Gina Lex 13116 -158thAve. SE Renton WA 98059 Jerry Marcy P.0.Box 575 Seattle WA 98111 Jim McDougal 14502 167th Pl. SE Renton WA 98059 Steven & Peri Muhich 13420 -160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Sally Nipert 14004 -156th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 DaveNyblom PMB 129 4820 NE 4th St., Ste. IOI Renton WA 98059-4845 David & Georgia Platt 5 IO Panoramic Dr. Camano Island WA 98282 Mike Romano Centurion Development Services 22617 8th Drive SE Bothell WA 98021 Charles & Viola Scoby 13112 • 158th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059-8531 LO I POO 16A & L03RE038 -Evendell Revision Seattle KC Health Dept. E. Dist. Environ. Health 14350 SE Eastgate Way Bellevue WA 98007 Howard Stansbury Centurion Development 22617 -8th Dr. SE Bothell WA 98021 David Watler 15635 SE 138thPL Renton WA 98059 Kurt Wilson Harbour Homes 1010 South 336th Street #305 Federal Way WA 98003 Greg Borba DDESILUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 Kristen Langley DDESILUSD Land Use Traffic MS OAK-DE-0100 Karen Scharer DDES/LUSD Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 Broce Whittaker DDES/LUSD Prel. Review Engineer MS OAK-DE-0100 Karen & Jeffrey Sidebotham 13004 -I 58th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Peggy Streit 13512 -160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Alex Weitz 15646 SE 138th PL Renton WA 98059 Alvin Wolberg 16021 SE 136th St. Renton WA 98059 Laura Casey DDESILUSD Wetland Review MS OAK-DE-0100 Anne Noris Clerk of Council MS KCC-CC-1025 Richard Warren Transportation Planner King Co. Dept of Transportation MS KSC-TR-0317 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL Page 16of22 Daniel B. Slaton 15315 SE 133rd Court Renton WA 98059 Penny Thorbeck 15650 SE 138th PL Renton WA 98059 Mr. & Mrs. Bob Wilmot 13900 -160th Ave. SE Renton WA 98059 Harold & Eleanor Zeek 16612 SE 145th St. Renton WA 98059 Kim Claussen DDESILUSD Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 Carol Rogers LUSD/CPLN MS OAK-DE-0100 Larry West DDESILUSD Geo Review MS OAK-DE-0100 In order to appeal the decision of the Examiner, written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the King County Council with a fee of $250.00 (check payable to King County Office of Finance) on or before February 18, 2004. lfa notice of appeal is filed, the original and six (6) copies ofa written appeal statement specifying the basis for the appeal and argument in support of the appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the King County Council on or before February 25, 2004. Appeal statements may refer only to facts contained in the hearing record; new facts may not be presented on appeal. LO I POOI 6A & L03RE038 -Evendell Revision Page 17 of22 Filing requires actual delivery to the Office of the Clerk of the Council, Room I 025, King County Courthouse, 516 3'• Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104, prior to the close of business (4:30 p.m.) on the date due. Prior mailing is not sufficient if actual receipt by the Clerk does not occur within the applicable time period. The Examiner does not have authority to extend the time period unless the Office of the Clerk is not open on the specified closing date, in which event delivery prior to the close of business on the next business day is sufficient to meet the filing requirement. If a written notice of appeal and filing fee are not filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date of this report, or if a written appeal statement and argument are not filed within twenty-one (21) calendar days of the date of this report, the decision of the hearing examiner contained herein shall be the final decision of King County without the need for further action by the Council. MINUTES OF THE MARCH 6 and 10, 2003 AND JANUARY 22, 2004 PUBLIC HEARING ON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FILE NO. LOIP0016 AND LOITY401; L03RE038 James N. O'Connor was the Hearing Examiner in this matter. Participating in the hearing were Karen Scharer, Kristin Langley, Bruce Whittaker and Laura Casey, representing the Department; Mike Romano, representing the Applicant; Marsha Rollinger and Gwendolyn High, representing the lntervenors; and Mark Heckert, Gary Norris, Scott Baker, Michael Rae Cooke, David Rockabrand, Dave Petry, Michelle Hagerman, Sally Nipert, Diane Kazele, Alex Weitz, Fred Jaques, Jim McDougal, John Nanney, Bill Mokin, Anita Oliphant, Vanessa Burris, June Hill, Rhonda Bryant, and Kristy Hill. The following exhibits were offered and entered into the record: Exhibit No. I Exhibit No. 2A 2B Exhibit No. 3A 3B Exhibit No. 4 Exhibit No. 5 Exhibit No. 6 DDES combined file LOITY401 & LOIP0016, application filed and dated July 6, 2001 DDES application for land use permit(s) LOITY401 & LOIP0016, application dated July 6, 2001 Zone reclassification application and justification questionnaire with revision received September 6, 200 I DDES preliminary report prepared 02/20/03 with attachments as follow: I. Map ofrezone from R-4 to R-6 2. Reduced copy ofR-6-70 lot preliminary plat 3. Reduced copy ofR-4-alternative 46 lot plat 4. Density calculations for R-6 plat 5. City of Renton January 20, 2003, letter 6. City of Renton June 15, 2001 letter 7. Certificate of water availability dated May 30, 200 I . 8. School information dated July 12, 2001 9. SWM adjustment approval for L02V0024 dated October 17, 2002 DDES addendum report with corrections and additional information regarding schools serving the property, prepared 02/27/03 Revised environmental checklist received October 14, 2002 Mitigated determination of non-significance dated December 23, 2002 Affidavit of posting indicating posting dates of October 3 and 4, 2001. LO 1 P0016A & L03RE038 -Evendell Revision Page 18 of22 Exhibit No. 7 A 7B Exhibit No. 8 Exhibit No. 9 Exhibit No. I 0 Exhibit No. 11 Exhibit No. 12 Exhibit No. 13 Exhibit No. 14 Exhibit No. 15 Exhibit No. 16 Exhibit No. 17 Exhibit No. 18 Exhibit No. 19 Exhibit No. 20 Exhibit No. 21 Exhibit No. 22 Exhibit No. 23 Exhibit No. 24 Exhibit No. 25 Exhibit No. 26 Exhibit No. 27 Exhibit No. 28 Exhibit No. 29 Exhibit No. 30 Exhibit No. 31 Exhibit No. 32 Exhibit No. 33 Exhibit No. 34 Exhibit No. 35 Exhibit No. 36 Exhibit No. 37 Exhibit No. 38 Exhibit No. 39 Exhibit No. 40 Exhibit No. 41 Exhibit No. 42 a b Site plan (70 lot preliminary plat map) received March 26, 2002 Alternative site plan ( 46 lot preliminary plat map) received March 26, 2002 Assessors maps (4) for SE 14-23-05 revised 02/23/95, NE 14-23-05 revised 04/05/93, NW 14-23-05 revised 10/92, and SW 14-23-05 revised 07/07/97 Traffic impact analysis by Garry Struthers Associates, Inc. dated June 28, 2001 Traffic memo dated January 29, 2002, from Garry Struthers Assoc., Inc. Preliminary technical infomiation report dated June, 2001, by Haozous Eng., P.S. Level 3 downstream drainage analysis by Haozous Eng., P.S., dated August 26, 2002 Addendum (6 pages plus cover) to the level-three study dated December 5, 2002 Wetland evaluation and delineation report, wildlife habitat evaluation and compensatory wetland mitigation plan by Habitat Technologies, dated May 15, 2001 Addendum to wetland/stream/wildlife report dated October 28, 2002 City of Renton three-page certificate of sewer availability dated 6/15/0 I Jaques, Fred & Helga email dated November I, 2001 Carlson, Marilynn letter dated November 7, 2001 Revised alternative R-4 plat density calculations received 3/26/02 Petition from Gwendolyn High (8 pg. + cover), received September 23, 2002 City of Renton letter received January 22, 2003, with attachments (4 pgs.) Letter from G. High & M. Rollinger for Citizens Alliance for a Responsible Evendell (CARE) dated April 5, 2002 with attachments (60 pgs. + cover) G. High and M. Rollinger, CARE petition to intervene filed on 2/18/03 DDES planning map ( created 7/1/2003) prepared 2/20/2003 showing new development planned in the immediate vicinity Letter from Greg Zimmerman, City of Renton, dated March 05, 2003 (2/12/03 memo attached) Certificate of Transportation Concurrency received July 6, 2001 Topographic map provided by City of Renton (aerial photography taken Winter, 1996) subject property in conjunction with Highland Estates Article from King County Journal, "Give Us Some Space, Firefighters Say ... " 02/27/2003 Transportation service areas 2000 map-KCDDES, February, 2001 Community action strategies sub-area priority ranking map-KCDOT, February, 2001 Assessors map of East Renton/Briarwood area with coloring Proposed but not entered into the record -area map showing nesting sites Online permit details-ODES website printouts (18 pgs.) Notice of application for the Bales Annexation and pre-zone application, dated January 15, 2003-City of Renton Letter from Scott D. Baker, Consulting Arborist dated 2/8/03 Tree retention/protection buffer site plan alternatives C.A.R.E. households list (2 pg) Letter from Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council dated March 5, 2003 Tree loss and possible ground water contamination depiction Sign-in and time donation sheet (3 pg) dated March 6, 2003 Transportation concurrency diagrams for 2001, 2002 & 2003 Letter (2 pg) from Don & Janice Milbrath dated March 3, 2003 Letter (2 pg) from Kristy J. Hill dated March 6, 2003 LOIP0016A & L03RE038-Evendell Revision Page 19 of22 Exhibit No. 43 C d e f g h J Exhibit No. 44 a b C d e f. Exhibit No. 45 a b C d e Letter (2 pg) from Edward and June Hill dated March 6, 2003 Letter (I pg) from Charles W. Scoby, Viola M. Scoby, and Geneva D. Scholes dated March 1, 2003 Letter (1 pg) from Laurie A. Hindes dated February 26, 2003 Letter (2 pg) from Mark Costello dated March 4, 2003 Letter ( I pg) from Eloise and Claude Stchc;,wiak dated March 6, 2003 Letter (3 pg) from Bruce and Joyce Osgoodby dated Feb. 21, 2003, and Mar, 6, 2003 Letter (1 pg) from Richard Savage (undated) Letter (I pg) from Dan & Lynn Peterson, also signed by Fred & Helga Jaques (undated) Letter ( 1 pg) from John Nanney dated March 6, 2003 Letter ( I pg) from Linda Williams dated March 5, 2003 Letter (I pg) from Rodney S. Stewart dated March 5, 2003 Letter (I pg) from Edward A. Schultz dated March 4, 2003 Letter (1 pg) from Joseph Matsudaira dated March 5, 2003 Letter (I pg) from Brenda Matsudaira dated March 5, 2003 Letter (I pg) from Richard & Anita Oliphant dated March 5, 2003 Letter (2 pg) from Mark Costello dated March 4, 2003 Letter (2 pg) from Jeff & Karen Sidebotham (undated) Letter ( I pg) signed by Nancy & Edward Hilton dated March 6, 2003 Memo (4 pg) from Michael Rae Cooke dated March 4, 2003, with attached resident survey sheet, error notes, and April 3, 2002, memo and attachments (8 pg) to King County Surface Water and Land Management The following items were entered at the March 10, 2003, continued hearing: Exhibit No. 46 Exhibit No. 47 Exhibit No. 48 Exhibit No. 49 Exhibit No. 50 Exhibit No. 51 Exhibit No. 52 Exhibit No. 53 Exhibit No. 54 Exhibit No. 55 Exhibit No. 56 a b C d e f g Photos (9) provided by Anita Oliphant with commentary (undated) Letter (3 pg) from Bruce and Joyce Osgoody dated February 21, 2003 Letter (I pg) from Marilynn Carlson dated March 9, 2003 Letter (2 pg) from Kristy Hill dated March 6, 2003 Letter (I pg) from Marsha Rollinger (undated) Letter (I pg) from Joseph Bostjancic dated March 5, 2003 Memo (1 pg) from Nick Gillen dated March 7, 2003 Copy of table #3 from the 2002 Issaquah school plan showing "Projected Capacity to House Sudents" Memo (I pg) from Mark Heckert, Habitat Technologies, dated March I 0, 2003 Gwendolyn High's testimony of March 6, 2003 with cover letter dated March 10, 2003 noting correction Letters from: Donald & Diane Kezelle (2 pg) -undated Vanessa Burris ( I pg) Carolyn Ann Buckett ( I pg) Ronda Bryant (3 pg) dated March 10, 2003 Michael Rae Cooke (7 pg) dated 3/8/02 Marsha Rollinger (I pg) undated Sally Nipert (I pg) dated March 6, 2003 LOIP0016A & L03RE038-Evende1l Revision Page20of21 h I Exhibit No. 57 Exhibit No. 58 Shirley Day (I pg) dated March 6, 2003 Bill and Donna Mokin (2 pg) dated March 6, 2003 Photos of hawk (2) DDES revised recommendation/additional conditions dated 3/10/03 The following exhibits were entered into the record at the January 22, 2004, hearing for the Evendell Revision: Exhibit No. 59 Exhibit No. 60a Exhibit No. 61 Exhibit No. 62 Exhibit No. 63 Exhibit No. 64 Exhibit No. 65 Exhibit No. 66 Exhibit No. 67 Exhibit No. 68 Exhibit No. 69 Exhibit No. 70 Exhibit No. 71 Exhibit No. 72 Exhibit No. 73 Exhibit No. 74 Exhibit No. 75 Exhibit No. 76 Exhibit No. 77 Department of Development and Environmental Services Application for major plat revision, filed I 0/1/03 Department of Development and Environmental Services preliminary report for the January 22, 2004, public hearing on file no. L03RE038, with attachments: I. 70-lot plat layout 2. Density calculations 3. Intent to sell and purchase density credits, dated 11/26/03 4. SEPA Adoption Notice, dated 11/10/03 5. Inquiry to Issaquah School District, dated 05/23/03 6. Certificate of Water Availability, dated 9/18/03 7. Letter from City of Renton, dated 11/19/03 8. Letter from City of Renton re: Sewer Extension, dated 11/26/03 9. Transportation Concurrency (e-mail of9/03/03 & Certificate# 01305) 10. SWM adjustment approval for file no. L02V0024, dated 10/17/02 Department of Development and Environmental Services corrections to the Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner, dated 1/22/04 Site Plan (plat map) for 70 lots, received October I, 2003. Notice of Application, Hearing & Recommendation, 11/10/03 Affidavit of Posting indicating November 3, 2003 as date of posting and November 6, 2003, as the date the affidavit was received by the Department of Development and Environmental Services Walkway study prepared by dmp, inc., dated 8/18/03 School walking route analysis, annotated by DDES, prepared 1/21/04 3/10/03 and 3/04/03 emails from Issaquah School District and Jeremy Febus re: LOOP0023 plat conditions for school walkways Examiner's recommendation to the Council-LOITY401 & LOIPOOl6, dated 3/28/03 Ordinance no. 14694 denying reclassification to R-6 under file LOITY401 Ordinance no. 14695 approving the 46 lot plat ofEvendell Jaques, Fred & Helga, e-mail regarding density, traffic, and infrastructure inadequate to support increase in density, received 1/20/04 Shirley A. Gaunt-Smith, note re: concerns, received J/20/04 Colored copy of plat map SEPA MDNS for Liberty Grove Contiguous, file no. L03TY401 & L03P0005, dated 12/16/03 SEPA MDNS application for Liberty Grove, file no. L03TY403 & L03P0006, dated 12/16/03 C.A.R.E. response: Evendell plat revision, L03RE038, dated 1/22/04 C.A.R.E. households list ,. LOI POO I 6A & L03RE03 8 -Evendell Revision Page 21 of21 Exhibit No. 78 Exhibit No. 79 Exhibit No. 80 Exhibit No. 81 Exhibit No. 82 Exhibit No. 83 Exhibit No. 84 Exhibit No. 85 Exhibit No. 86 Exhibit No. 87 Exhibit No. 88 Exhibit No. 89 Exhibit No. 90 Exhibit No. 91 Exhibit No. 92 Exhibit No. 93 Exhibit No. 94 Exhibit No. 95 Exhibit No. 96 Exhibit No. 97 Exhibit No. 98 Exhibit No. 99 Exhibit No. I 00 Exhibit No. IOI Exhibit No. 102 Exhibit No. I 03 3/28 and 4/10/00 press releases re: Transfer of Development Credits Six-year transit development plan showing urban centers, dated February, 2002 King County General Government Budget Advisory Task Force report, dated 6/25/03 A Joint City Position statement for the King County Budget Advisory Task Force Message to employees from King County Executive Ron Sims, re: budget advisory task force, dated 6/09/03 King County Council, Budget & Fiscal Management Committee Capital Budget Panel -2004 CIP Budget Overview Article entitled "Facing the Challenges -In Transportation" by Harold Taniguchi dated 11.94 Transportation Service Areas 2000 High accident locations report no. 16, dated July 2003 King County transportation concurrency maps 200 l, 2002 and 2003 Transportation concurrency map, level of service standards status, dated 3/07/02 2003 Annual Growth Report -excerpts King County Benchmarks Report 2003: Land Use -excerpts Bui I dab le Lands Report of 8/29/02 -excerpts State, county, city populations report from OFM Forecasting, State of Washington Renton Strategic Planning Department -staff reports of 6/03, 9/23, I 0/0 I and 10/10/03 Renton Planning Commission recommendation of October 22, 2003 Renton Ordinance no. 5026 Renton City Council regular meeting minutes of November 24, 2003 ODES revised recommendations/additional conditions for file no. LOIPOOl6, 70-lot plat, dated 3/10/03 Photographs (5 color copies) of tree damage to Kezele and Thorbeck Homes No exhibit entered Photographs (4 color copies) taken by Diane Kezele Letter to the Hearing Examiner from Edward and June Hill (undated) Letter to the Hearing Examiner from Kristy J. Hill dated January 21, 2004 Letter to the Hearing Examiner from Anita and Richard Oliphant dated 01/22/04 JOC:ms/gao LOIPOOI6A-L03RE038 RPT .• ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219· December 4, 2003 Wayne Jones Lakeridge Development P.O. Box 146 Renton, WA 98057 Mel L. Daley, P.E. Daley-Morrow-Poblete, Inc. / 726 Auburn Way North Auburn, WA 98002 RE: Liberty Grove Contiguous Subdivision 1998 KCSWDM Adjustment and Shared Facility Plan Request (File No. L03V0065) Dear Applicant and Engineer: The Land Use Services Division, Engineering Review Section, has completed review of the adjustment request for the Liberty Grove Contiguous subdivision. You are requesting approval for an adjustment from the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) Core Requirement No. 1, Section 1.2.1, Discharge at the Natural Location and approval of a shared facility plan with the Liberty Grove subdivision. Our review of the information and a site visit provides the following findings: I. The froposed Liberty Grove Contiguous subdivision is located between 160'h and 162" Avenues SE, south of SE 1361h Street. The 36 lot, 7.9 acre, proposed Liberty Grove Contiguous subdivision is filed under Land Use Services Division (LUSD) file number L03P0005. The proposed Liberty Grove subdivision is located in the northwest quadrant of the 1601h Avenue SE/SE 1361h Street intersection. The 24 lot, 4.8 acre, proposed Liberty Grove subdivision is filed under Land Use Services Division (LUSD) file number L03P0006. 2. The Liberty Grove and Liberty Grove Contiguous subdivisions are located in the Orting Hills subbasin of the Lower Cedar River basin. The sites are subject to the Level Two flow control and Basic water quality requirements of the 1998 KCSWDM. 3. The Liberty Grove site slopes gently to the south and southeast, causing sheetflow to migrate to the south property line where it is intercepted by a well defined ditch. The ditch flows east to the west side of 160 1h Avenue SE into a well defined channel that proceeds south. Gentle slopes across the Liberty Grove Contiguous site direct sheetflow to the southwest. This results in the eastern portion of the site sheetflowing across the south property line where a constructed swale located on the adjacent parcel to the south carries flows to the midpoint of the common property line. Central flows migrate through an on-site wetland that allows excess flow to join intercepted eastern flows at the midpoint outlet. The drainage path from the defined outlet contill!!Fs Exhibit No ,12 :t:... ,...;:;;--''-----.,,.. =Lf-J6?~2J King County Hearing Examiner Liberty Grove Contiguous/L03 V0065 December 4, 2003 Page 2 of3 south through a defined open swale that bisects several parcels to the south and ultimately flows via stream channel south in the 162°d Avenue SE unopened right-of- way. Sheetflow from the western side of the site migrates to the southwest and eventually reaches the ditch system on the east side of 160'h Avenue SE. Flow from this portion of the site flows south in the ditch system on the east side of l 60'h Avenue SE. Liberty Grove and western Liberty Grove Contiguous flows meet V. mile south on 1601h Avenue SE at a newly upgraded culvert crossing. Combined flows then cross parcel #145750-0110 to the east to rejoin eastern Liberty Grove Contiguous flows in the vicinity of the 162°d Avenue SE unopened right-of-way. Both sites have upstream tributary area of several acres. 4. The proposal is to collect most runoff from the Liberty Grove site and divert it to a single, combined detention and water quality facility located in the southwest comer of the Liberty Grove Contiguous site. Flows across the Liberty Grove Contiguous site will also be collected and diverted to the single, shared facility. The allowed release would then be proportionally split between the southern flows on the east side of l 60'h Avenue SE and the natural discharge path that runs south through the neighboring parcels. Nuisance flows across the south property line of Liberty Grove Contiguous would be significanti curtailed. A small reduction of flow would occur in the western ditch of 160 Avenue SE, offset by an increase in the eastern ditch. It is not clear if frontage improvements are included in the conceptual drainage plan. 5. No decorative ponds or shallow wells have been identified that would be affected by the proposed diversion. 6. The Level One Downstream Analysis identified drainage complaints related to conveyance overflows at 14028 160'h Avenue SE (Brenden/Myers) and in the southeast comer of the 145750-0110 parcel and adjacent neighbor (Gragg) to the south. Continuing to utilize the natural discharge path that traverses the center of the intervening parcels reduces the volume of total flows that would reach the problem conveyance area and would minimize the diversion of flows. The applicant has offered mitigation in the form of Level Three flow control in the on-site detention system and, via a combination of flow control and.splitting outflows, maintaining predeveloped flowrates to parcel 145750-0110. Potential conveyance upgrades along any of the downstream paths will be addressed in the plat conditions. 7. Both sites are being developed by the same applicant who intends to build both projects at the same time. 8. A consolidation of facilities for the proposed subdivisions will be more economical in long term maintenance. Based on these findings, we hereby approve this adjustment to allow the diversion of runoff to a single, shared facility draining via flow splitter to two downstream paths with the following conditions: Liberty Grove Contiguous/L03V0065 December 4, 2003 Page 3 of3 I. The release rates for the detention facility will be based on all of the tributary area to be developed being directed to the facility. 2. The volume for the detention facility will be based on all flows directed to the facility at full development under current zoning. The allowed release rate will be reduced by any undetained flows that would bypass the proposed subdivision drainage facilities. The detention volume shall be sized using the Level Three flow control standard in the 1998 KCSWDM. A IO to 20 percent volumetric factor of safety must be applied to all storm events requiring detention. The design Technical Information Report shall state the factor of safety selected and the basis of that determination. 3. Water quality facilities must be sized based on the entire proposed subdivision draining to the facilities including any required frontage improvements. 4. All onsite or offsite drainage facilities must be located in a public right-of-way, recreation space tract with easement or storm drainage tract dedicated to King County. 5. Developed flows from Liberty Grove must be conveyed via tightline to the drainage facility located in the Liberty Grove Contiguous site. If not built concurrently, Liberty Grove Contiguous must precede Liberty Grove. 6. Additional storm drainage requirements identified by SEPA or the plat hearing review will apply to this project. If you have any further questions regarding this KCSWDM adjustment or the design requirements, please contact Mark Bergam at (206) 296-7270. Sincerely, -r_, i ·• ) / r r 1 1--····· . ' -' James Sanders, P.E. Development Engineer Engineering Review Section Land Use Services Division Jim Chan, P.E. Supervising Engineer Site Engineering and Planning Section Building Services Division cc: Curt Crawford, P.E., Managing Engineer, Stormwater Services Section, KCDNR Randall Parsons, P.E., Engineer III, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Bruce Whittaker, Engineer III, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Karen Scharer, Project/Program Manager II, Current Planning Section, LUSD Mark Bergam, P.E., Engineer III, Engineering Review Section, LUSD ' ® King County Department of DeveJopmeut and Environmental Sen1ces 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Surface Water Design Manual Requirements / Standards Adjustment* Request Project Name: Address: 72(, ,4()$0/V'J WA INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT/DESIGN ENGINEER: Please be SLr8 to include all plans (T.I.R, if available), sketches, photos and maps that may assist In complete review and consideration of this adjustment request. Failure to provide alt pertinent Information may result in delayed processing or denlal of YOll" request Please submit two cornptete copies of this request application fonn, and applicable fee to the ODES Intake Counter, at 900 Oakesdale Avenue Soothwes~ Renton, Washington 98055-1219. For additional lnformatloo, phone RandaH Parsons, P.E., at (206) 29!;.7207. ••·••••\'\iir,~ .. ~ .. i!BertO!l'J(..: •• r~·¢u.pi'jjn•••i•\!l!'••••·rn~•~~I! DB!ltG!l··~.u,.·roa~~-·· DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT REQUEST: ~andard trconnplex D Experimental D Blanket D Pre-application APPLICABLE VERSION KCSWDM: D 1990 (11/95) • ~8 (9/98) D ___ _ • (Note: the term "variance• replaced by "adjustment") APPLICABLE SECTION(S) OF STANDARDS: Co11.e Rc<;(./1/!.eHe-NT /l/i,. I JUSTIFICATION PER KCSWDM SECTION 1.4.2 D See attachments listed below. /, Jl,(,S ilFICArtotl FOi!. AtJ<IUSTHcNT !<£(rt/CST 2-11/CltVIT'f HA/' 3-ASSE ssott'S HAPS AUTHORIZATIONSlSNATURES: DETERMINATION: D Approval ::,.!Conditional Approval (see below) D DNR/WLRD Approval Signed: ---i'f-r.:-#.:7''lf'/-..,:-- DDES Staff Recommendation Sf\pled: Condllons of Approval: See attaohed Memo Dated: ODES DIRECTOR/DESIGNEE: Signe<!: Date: -~1· 't ! ' ) /· / ,~-..... DOES,J.an,l Use Services Div., Engineering Review Supervi11<>r. / . F99/Ji!RS/stmof-ADJ .doc F96/ERS/SWN1R-S. Cpy22. doc 11/ l 7 /'39 ck D Denial D.D.E.S. ~4£D-Of4-I t 4-5 7 56--008'S ODC/0 (FORMERLY DALEY ENGINEERING CO.) DALEY· MORROW· POBLETE, INC. ENGINEERING -PLANNING • SURVEYING 726 AUBURN WAY N AUBURN, WASHINGTON 98002 TELEPHONE (253) 333-2200 FAX (253) 333-2206 DRAINAGE ADJUSTMENT JUSTIFICATION The proposed Liberty Grove and Liberty Grove Contiguous developments are within three separate parcels, located near the northwest and southeast comers of the intersection of SE 136th Street and 160th Avenue SE. Parcel 3664500141, which is located near the northwest comer of said intersection, will be developed as Liberty Grove. Parcels 1457500085 and 1457500090, which are located near the southeast comer of the previously mentioned intersection, will be developed as Liberty Grove Contiguous. The parcels are located within the NE and SE quarters of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County Washington .. There is an existing house and shop within the proposed the Liberty Grove development, with the remainder of the site mostly covered with grass and some tree. Liberty Grove is approximately 4.84 acres. The Liberty Grove site has an average slope of approximately 3.6 percent, and generally drains to the south via sheet flow, then through the conveyance facilities along the west side of 1601h Avenue SE. There are two houses within the proposed Liberty Grove Contiguous development, with associated structures. The 7.92-acre Liberty Grove Contiguous site is presently forested in the northeast comer, with the remainder of the site being dominated by pasture land. There is a wetland area within the southwest comer, which will remain, and will be protected by a 25-foot buffer. The Liberty Grove Contiguous site has an average slope of 4 percent, and generally releases water along the southern property line and the east side of 1601h Avenue SE. It is proposed to construct the detention facility within the south~comer ofLiberty Grove Contiguous. Discharge will be to the existing conveyance facilities along the east side of 160th Avenue SE. The drainage facilities consist of driveway culverts and drainage ditches. The system components are shown in Exhibit C of the Off-site Analysis, and are itemized in the Off- site Analysis Drainage System Table (Exhibit I). There have been several complaints within this downstream system, copies of which are included in Exhibit G of the Off-site Analysis. Furthermore since we are proposing to convey runoff from Liberty Grov;i· s f3'stem, the facility will have to convey more flows. We are therefore proposing to i @~~@ facilities between point 1 to point 24 (See Exhibits C and I of the Off-si sffiiJrlew'ii O conveyance system will be designed to handle the peak flow rates. SEP I 1 200J K.c. o.o.e.s. ~~v~ -f -I This development involves the creation of sixty single-family residential lots within both developments. Access roads and roadway improvements will also be a part of the development. As previously stated, the detention facility will be constructed in the south~er of Liberty Grove Contiguous. A wetpond, sized per the Basic Water Quality Menu, will be constructed below the detention facility. Due to the proposed location of the detention facility, it will be necessary to divert runoff from Liberty Grove to the east and into the detention facility, instead of flowing down to the south (See attached map). Downstream facilities from Liberty Grove to the new 24" ADS culvert crossing 16Q'h Avenue SE will be bypassed, while flows between the detention facility down to the east end of the 24" culvert will be increased. Flows from the west and east sides of 160th Avenue SE converge at the east end of the 24" culvert. Since flows to the east side ofl60th Avenue SE will be increased, conveyance facilities along the east side will be improved up to the convergence point. As previously stated, most of the runoff from Liberty Grove Contiguous leaves the site along the south property line. Since most of the post development flows will be conveyed to the detention facility and will be discharge to the facilities along 160th Avenue SE, additional flows will have to be considered in the upsizing of the conveyance facilities. This Adjustment Request is for diverting water from the west side of 160th Avenue SE (between Liberty Grove and the 24" ADS culvert) to the east side of 160th Avenue SE. In addition, the request is being made to allow post-development runoff to be conveyed to the detention pond and released directly to 160th Avenue SE, instead of being released along the south property line of Liberty Grove Contiguous. Both Liberty Grove and Liberty Grove Contiguous are part of the same basin. We believe that our proposal benefits the public for the following reasons: l. By diverting flows from Liberty Grove to Liberty Grove Contiguous, there will only be one stormwater facility to be maintained by the County. 2. Improvements to the downstream facilities will eliminate existing problems. 3. Re-routing flows to the south of Liberty Grove Contiguous to the public facilities within the 160th Avenue SE R.O.W. will eliminate potential for failure of the private facilities downstream from the site. We believe the above reasons justify our adjustment request. We therefore respectfully request that this Adjustment be granted approval. • ~®King County 1111111111111111111111 A §dGM Comments SedrCh iMAP Print Paae I , ,_ 1 I J-I I 11-1--0067 0023 /»,a ' 'I -·--.... ~ 010G mm 9UI; --• fm5 i.~ - -J!!: 0136 ·~ ·~~ -. 0131 filtffiJ ~ -r-...... ' -~ latl ------~ 01:lli ~ .:~ ----~ ~ -~ -' . • " I r I lm8 II f,./&0."1 , -· .. . -010 "'' ----I/ ~ 014, I '22 --111!19 -'( '/Z,or/ I --m, -I I, .II.,, II --~ -I OIi ~-- 0006 -911122 ··-.....J/ r r,~ ~ - ~ '" ~ I -g1t2 I 0127 I '12' -9019 ,! ,,.-~ ~ 0126 -I -~ ~6-i L.lJ 9012 9042 -~-.l • ,, M .... ·-·· , w,sr a:wv,;. I -GOS1 =-9074 9051 'fAN~ .,,. ':Ci I l l ,. 1.,.J· ~T-. +-FAC1t.1r1£S 'n)4fi" ~ .f~l'f>r6P .. l)ET,N7 •• ·~ i~'f/'ASt#V ncr-J \ ~l11t.1rr, ---0097 ~i M _--;. I .... 0101 FU>wi 7" r~ ' 0060 ~ .~ I 9104 9101 ,/2-/ VJ.'~L~-r o,Jf,llt. t. ' €" /,VQ/2. :. -~ 9D57 -V ~=cc -· ---.M-~~ ,_ ;;;/ ~ l 91123 9011 --9041 ,,~. --0\, !J 0110 --~·Ml t: -r1 .,,.. 901S 0116 J '/ 1-,-.. 9091 --,_ 01!6 0154 01GD · ST 'iiii"" I JI/ I "'' ~ 'M:'Y~-lm(o;o,-. ne Information induded on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, competeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such nformation. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, inclrect. incidental, or consequential damages induding, bUt not limited to, ost revenues or lost profits res!Jting from the use or misuse of the Information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or Information on his mao is orohibited exceDt hv written nArmission of Kina Countv. King county I GIS Center I~ I~ I Comments I Search By vioiling this and other King County web pa-. you "1<P~ "II'~ Ip Ii!> bQund by lorTJ>II ~ng con~n• of lhe site. The details. 11 12 I I I I ---~-:;:;:_-.=~==---------T-- 14 SITE w U) SE 136TH · 13 ST 1 I I I I I I I I I +-=~-++'-'~.--t"W...--------+-- RENTON I FISH ANO """' CLUB I RE'.C ARE'.A 24 1 VICINITY MAP Scale: 1" = 1 /2 MILE I I I I I I I 00 &©&llW&tfr SEP I 1 2003 /..!:V K.c. o.o.e.s. 1-CJ?JV ®t,6 CASEY ENGINEERING P.O. BOX 1255 FALL CITY, WA 98024-1255 CELL: 206-227-8187 FAX: 425-228-7232 November 20, 2003 Bruce Whittaker, P.E. L.U.S.D. King County D.D.E.S. REFERENCE: Liberty Grove Contiguous, L03P0005, (L03TY401) and Liberty Grove, L03P0006, (L03TY403) SUBJECT: Response to November 12, 2004, Plat Screening, Request For Additional Downstream Information Dear Mr. Whittaker: The following is a narrative of the existing downstream system from the Parcel "B" portion of the Liberty site to the Petrie Property. A. Description of stormwater drainage within the Parcel "B" portion of project: The stormwater generated from the site in the existing condition and any stormwater that enters the site from the north (SE 136th St.) flows to an existing wetland at the southern central portion of the property. The wetland is shown on the preliminary plat. Stormwater leaves Parcel "B" at the low point of the wetland and flows to the south. It should be noted that the wetland is not a closed depression. B. Description of Stormwater Drainage Across Property#l: Tax Parcel#: "0095" 13802 160th Ave. SE Steve & Joanne Lee This property is located directly to the south of Parcel "B" of the proposed development. Permission was granted by the property owner to cross this property. Stormwater leaving Parcel "B" (under a wood fence) enters Property#l and is intec.r.. d X. b constructed swale (sump). See Picture#2 that is taken from the ·.. vPy L03P0006 , . Rf:.C'i!:!:IVFl')l.08 PO o o 5 STORMWATER HYDRAUUC ANALYSIS CIVIL ENGINEERING DESIGN LAND PLANNING I 1 • L; If\ .. North end of the swale looking south. The swale (sump) is approximately 15' wide and 28' long. At the south end of the swale there is a 12" Concrete Pipe (CP). The top of the existing grade around the swale is approximately 3.5' above the IE of the culvert. The culvert conveys stormwater across this property to the adjacent property to the south. Within this property there is also an additional swale that flows into the above mentioned sump. The swale is to the south of the Parcel "B" fence and begins approximately 50' east of the southeast corner Parcel "B". This swale intercepts stormwater leaving the Parcel "B" property and directs the stormwater to the west to the sump feature. Picture #1 is taken to the east of the sump, looking to the east. This swale is approximately 10' wide and 2' deep with gentle side slopes. The swale is grassed and is stable. C. Description of Stormwater Drainage Across Property#2: Tax Parcel#: "0096": 13814 1601h Ave. SE Brett Bowden. Mr. Bowden granted permission to cross his property. Reach 1: A 12" CP conveyance system outfalls from Property 1 to Property 2 adjacent to a large cottonwood stump. The pipe discharges into a short swale/ditch that is approximately 8' long and 3' wide. The swale is approximately 3' deep with varying side slopes and appears to be stable. At the end of the swale is a 12" CP pipe that conveys stormwater under a gravel road. The IE of the CP to the top pf the gravel road is approximately 2.5'. Reach 2: Stormwater leaves the 12" CP under the gravel road and enters a broad swale. Picture#3 was taken near the upstream culvert under the gravel road looking to the south. The swale is approximately 110' long, 3' wide at the bottom, approximately 3' deep with varying side slopes. The swale ends at another gravel road. There is a 12" CP at the southern end of the swale where the water is conveyed under the gravel road. Picture #4 was taken at the southern end of Reach 2 looking to the north. D. Description of Stormwater Drainage Across Property#3: Tax Parcel# "0101": The property owner was not home and a card was left at the front door. Reach 1: Stormwater leaving the 12" CP under the gravel road from Property 2, discharges into a shallow ditch on the north side of the driveway access to the Property 3 residence -see Picture #5. The ditch flows for a short distance to the south and then turns to the west -see Picture #6. At the western terminus of the ditch, stormwater is intercepted by a 12" CP that conveys stormwater under the driveway to the south. Picture #7 shows the outfall at the southern side of the gravel drive. The ditch is approximately 2' wide, 1' deep with varying side slopes. There was approximately 2' from invert to the top of the gravel road. There were no observed capacity issues within this reach. Reach 2: Stormwater leaving the 12" CP under the gravel road for Property 3 enters a clearly defined channel/swale that varies in width from 2' to 5' with side slopes from 3: 1 to flatter. This channel flows to the southeast. Near the southern property line of this parcel, the channel transitions to a wide, broad swale that matches the existing topography of the land. The identification of a clearly defined drainage feature at this point cannot be distinguished. There are no identified capacity issues within this reach. E. Description of Stormwater Drainage Across Properties#4 &#5: Tax Parcels # "0100" & "0116": There was no attempt to contact property owners for this portion of the downstream analysis, as the houses were quite a distance to the west from the area of interest. Stormwater leaving Property 3 enters into a very broad area with no defined drainage features. The ground slopes gently to the southeast. The majority of this area is covered with alders, salmonberries, vine maples and low groundcover. The ground is hummocky. There are tree blow-downs and debris from historic logging activity. The logical direction that stormwater would flow was followed to a point that terminated at an eastjwest dirt bike trail. There was no defined channel across this trail. It is assumed that this trail was within Property#S. Within this area, there were many dirt bike trails meandering every which way. A route was chosen (to the southeast) to continue the investigation through an area that appeared to be where stormwater would flow in the absence of the dirt bike trails. This route led to an old stream channel. The channel was meandering with a rocky bottom and no water. This channel is within the southeastern portion of Property#S. This channel was followed to a point where it entered Property#6. There are no identified capacity concerns within these properties. F. Description of Stormwater Drainage Across Property#6: Tax Parcel# "0110": The property owner was contacted for this report. Stormwater enters Property#6 approximately 120' west of the northeast east/west fence line that is assumed to be near the property corner. At this location, there is a 4' high field fencing with 2 strands of barbwire on the top. There is old pink survey flagging attached to the centerline of the stream with the notation "CL Stream". The stream continues to the southeast through the property and leaves the site approximately 80' south of the northeast fence corner. The stream within Property#6 is within a wide broad channel with varying side slopes. There are no identified capacity issues within this property. Attached is the following information: 1. Copies of photos described in this report. /:.~.,"i.-~":. ·; .,,•·.-·~~- ' • !'~ ... ;.: .. ~-; l'"''-·! .,, : /· ( . t .• ' .Jl .•. ·, ' . ,, ~· ... ,, "i' . ,)~ . .. ., . ' ' ~ .~ . ~~·· " ; .. : .... • '' ·, ' \. ,. \ J :.{ .·,"'1j,. . ' ' : . ; . ';' i. ,,.,.· .,i:. •" ' .• ,, ~ ~ J' .. ··, f . I f I,' I • )I;:- ,, ·' . ... ~- tJ ,_,-~-- .... ,4 ... : ' ' ~. t ' ' . SEE DRAWINGS) ·, • ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakooalc Avenue Southwest Rcnlon, WA 9U05!i-l2I9 November 27, 2002 Mr. Wayne Jones · Lakeridge Development, Inc. P. 0. Box 146 Renton, WA 98057 RE: Liberty Plat, A02P0151 Wetland Determination ttECEIVEll DECO 2 2002 ~ns'd Dear Mr~~ · · I reviLd the Wetland Evaluation and Delineation Report and Wildlife Habitat . Evaluation for the "Liberty Ridge" property, prepared by Habitat Technologies, Inc., dated November 5, 2002. I met Mark Heckert of Habitat Technologies at the site on November 25, 2002 and walked the property and surrounding areas. I also reviewed aerial photos in the County files, from 1936, 1970, 1985, 1990, 1996 and 2000. I conferred with several of my colleagues on interpretation of the Sensitive Areas Code in relation to this property. The site consists of two properties, separated by 160th Avenue SE. Parcel A (3664500141) has apparently been filled many years ago (prior to 1985) with ditches installed around the west, south and east sides.· The property is maintained as lawns and landscaping with a residence and shop. There are neither wetlands nor streams on this parcel. Parcel Bis two tax parcels (1457500085 and 1457500090). The northeastern portion of this site is forested upland. The remainderof the property is pasture with a few structures and outbuildings. A central drainage through the site was ditched across the property following recent construction of three residences to the northwest. This conveyance has some wetland characteristics through the fogged area, then is ditches across the pasture. An eastern drainage outlets from a culvert under SE 136th Street, conveying stormwater runoff from the roads, fawns and roofs of a pre-1970's subdivision to the north. This drainagt#f-4/N ~ has some wetland characteristics through the forested area, then is ditched lf.,: Co through the pasture. These drainages are excavated through upland soils, and IOt, are neither used by salmon ids nor convey a stream that was naturally occurring prior to construction. Therefore, they are neither jurisdictional wetlands nor streams. rITllEC~~1vJ~ ln} MAR 1 ·1 2003 LD5f~ K.C. D.D.E.S. ,• TO: Mr. WcJ.yne Jones RE: Liberty Plat, A02P0151 November 27, 2002 Page 2 However, the wetland on the south-central portion of the site appears to have been present since at feast the mid-1980s. The eastern ditch is evident in the 1970 aerial photo, conveying water from the culvert under SE 1361h Street since that time. Thus, the source of hydrology to the wetland from the culvert is the "normal circumstance" for that wetland. This wetland on the south-central portion of Parcel B meets the criteria for a Class 3 rating. The wetland and a minimum 25-foot buffer must be protected through the subdivision process by placement in a Sensitive Areas Tract. The wetland buffer width could be averaged, as allowed in Code and Administrative Rule, with enhancement of the wetland and buffer provided as compensatory mitigation. The wetland's hydrology must be protected through.the subdivision process. This could occur by conveying the flows from the culvert underneath SE 135th Street across the site, either in pipes or aboveground, and outletting into the wetland through a dispersal system. Alternatively, equivalent hydrology could be calculated and possibly provided from roof drainage from surrounding structures. The stormwater runoff from the three new residences to the northwest is not required to be conveyed to the wetland as this is a recent new input to the wetland. The wildlife habitat survey may need an addendum prepared during early spring, to determine whether any of the nests observed on-site are used by species that require protection under the King County Comprehensive Plan. This property is within the Urban-designated portion of the County, so the few species that require protection include state and federal endangered, threatened or sensitive species, and certain raptors and herons. Please let me know if you have any questions or would like to discuss this further. I can be reached at (206} 296-7291 or laura.casey@metrokc.gov. Cc: Mark Heckert, Habitat Technologies, Inc. Steve Bottheim, Supervising Engineer, Critical Areas Section HABITAT TECHNOLOGIES WETLAND EVALUATION ANO DELINEATION REPORT ANO WILDLIFE HABITAT EVALUATION LAKERIDGE PROJECT SITE King County, Washington Part of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. prepared for Lakeridge Development Inc. P.O. Box 146 Renton, Washington 98057.0146 prepared by HABITAT TECHNOLOGIES P.O. Box 1088 Puyallup, Washington 98371-1088 253-845-5119 November 5, 2002 Exhibit No. -«-.i~-- · ltllm No. Lo'\ ~Doc') (,p Received .!J-10-0,,Y King County Hearing Examiner wetlands, streams, fisheries, wildlife -mitigation and permitting solutions P.O. Box 1088, Puyallup, Washington 98371 voice 253-845-5119 fax 253-841-1942 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Lakeridge Project Site is approximately 12.7 acres in total size and located to the east of the City of Renton, King County, Washington. The project site is comprised of three parcels; two contiguous parcels (Parcel B # 1457500085 and 1457500090) of 7.9 acres and an adjacent parcel ( Parcel A# 3664500141) of 4.8 acres, kitty-comer to the northwest The Parcel A portion of the project site is dominated by a well managed and maintained lawn. A single-family dwelling with a detached shop is located in the eastern portion of Parcel A The parcel B portion of the project site is dominated by a livestock pasture in the south with a single-family residence and barn in the west, and a forested area in the north, the western portion of which has been cleared within the last ten years. Onsite assessment of the project site following the procedures outlined in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Wash. Manual) and the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987 Manual) resulted in the identification of one area that exhibited hydric soils, wetland hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation consistent with the established criteria of both the Wash. and 1987 Manuals. This area had been impacted by prior grazing and pasture management activities, and active and on-going lawn and pasture management. This assessment, completed in accordance with King County regulations, included an evaluation of the function and value rating for the identified wetland, a classification of the wetland following the U.S. Fish and Wildlife methods, and an identification of the standard King County buffer width required for this wetland. Onsite assessment also included an evaluation . of the wildlife habitat availability and utilization. . Species presence and habitat utilization were evaluated following the methods identified by Homer and Raedeke (1989) and within U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Publication 80/58 (Mikol, 1980). In addition, the King County Wildlife Study Guidelines (Draft Wildlife Management in King County, Issue Paper, 1993) were followed to assure consistency with the King County permit process and documentation of habitat types. WEn.AND SIZEONSITE CLASSIFICATION KING COUNTY FUNCTION STANDARD {square feet) {USFWS) RATING AND VALUE BUFFER RATING WIDTH C 9,167 PEME 3 tow 25 feet . PEME palustnne, emergent, seasonally flooded The "habitat type" best represented within the site would be that of "Agricultural Lands." This habitat type included two freshwater wetlands. PRIMARY HABITAT TYPES INCLUDED MINOR HABITAT TYPES -Agricultural Lands Wet meadow -Residential Mixed Upland Forest-low understorv The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and King County, as well as a number of other local, state, and federal agencies, regulate activities in and around identified wetland and drainage corridor areas. Such regulations focus on the avoidance of adverse impacts to wetlands, streams, associated buffers and the mitigation of such impacts that cannot be avoided. King County has established criteria to categorize wetlands for purposes of regulation and the establishment of buffers. In addition, King County allows a limited amount of alterations to wetlands (i.e. isolated wetlands, roadway crossings) provided such impacts are mitigated pursuant to an approved mitigation plan. The Selected Action Plan of the Lakeridge project site focuses on the creation of independent lots suitable for the development of single-family homesites consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 STUDY PURPOSE................................................................................................................ l SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................. l BACKGROUND INFORMATION ......................................................................................... 2 NATIONAL WE'ILAND INVENTORY MAPPING ............................................................. 2 STATE OFWASlilNGTON PRIORITY HABITATS AND SPECIES .................................. 2 STATE OFWASlilNGTON STREAM CATALOG .............................................................. 2 KING COUNTY SENSITIVE AREAS MAPPING ................................................................ 2 SOILS MAPPING .................................................................................................................. 2 AERIAL PHOTO ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... 3 ONSITE EVALUATION -WETLANDS ................................................................................ 3 WETLAND STUDY ME1HODS .......................................................................................... 3 FIELD OBSERVATION ........................................................................................................ 4 • Vegetation................................................................................................................. 4 • Soils .......................................................................................................................... 5 • Hydrology .................................................................................................................. 5 WETLAND AND STREAM DETERMINATION .................................................................. 6 WE1LAND FUNCTION AND VALUE ASSESSMENT ........................................................ 7 ONSITE WETLAND VALUATION ...................................................................................... 9 ONSITE EVALUATION -WILDLIFE .................................................................................. ! 0 WILDLIFE STUDY ME1HODS ....................................... : .................................................. 10 ONSITEHABITATTYPES ................................................................................................. 10 _ PLANT AND ANIMAL SPECIES OBSERVATIONS ............................... , .......................... 11 MOVEMENT CORRIDORS ................................................................................................ 12 PRIORITY SPECIES ............................................................................................................ 13 STATE CANDIDATE SPECIES .......................................................................................... 13 REGULATORY CONSIDERATION ..................................................................................... 13 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS -SECTION404 .......................................................... 13 STATE OFWASlilNGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY ............................................. 14 KING COUNTY -"ENvlRONMENTALLY SENSil1VE AREAs" ORDINANCE 2 lA.24 ................ 14 • Wetland and Stream Classes ..................................................................................... 14 • Required Buffers ................ .-...................................................................................... 15 SELECTED ACTION PLAN ..••.•••.••.•.•..••...•...•••••••...•........••••••••.••......•••.•••• : •.•...•.......•....••••••.• 16 FIGURES ................................................................................................................................. 17 REFERENCE LIST ................................................................................................................ 18 APPENDIX A ..••...••.••••.•.••..•••••...............•••••.•....•....••••...•...........•.••••••••••••..........•.•••••........•..•..• 19 STANDARD OF CARE Prior to extensive site planning, this document should be reviewed and the wetland boundaries verified by the appropriate resource and permitting agencies. Welland boundaries, wetland classifications, wetland ratings, and all proposed wetland restoration and enhancement activities should be reviewed and approved by King County and potentially other regulatory staff. The above consultants have provided professional services that are in accordance with the degree of care and skill generally accepted in the nature of the work accomplished. No other warranties are expressed or implied. The consultant is not responsible for design costs incurred before this document is approved by the appropriate resource and permitting agencies. Mark Heckert Wetland Ecologist INTRODUCTION This report details the culmination of activities and onsite evaluations undertaken to complete both a wetlands evaluation and a wildlife habitats assessment as an element of the planning and site development of the Lakeridge Project Site. The project area is approximately 12.7 acres in total size and generally located within a quickly urbanizing area east of the City of Renton, King County, Washington (Figure 1 ). The evaluation and delineation of onsite and adjacent wetlands, drainage corridors, and wildlife habitats is a vital element in the planning and selection of a site development action. The goal of this approach is to assure that planned site platting does not result in adverse environmental impacts to such areas. Wetlands are generally defined as "those areas of King County that are inundated or saturated by ground or surface water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under nonnal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." (King County Environmentaffy Sensitive Areas). STUDY PURPOSE This purpose of this document is to present the results of the onsite assessment and evaluation of the wetland/drainage corridor areas and the wildlife habitats within the project area. Included within this report is an assessment of the proposed impacts and compensatory actions to be taken to ensure that proposed onsite actions do not adversely impact environmentally sensitive areas. This study was designed to accommodate site planning and potential regulatory actions. This report is suitable for submittal to federal,· state, and local authorities for wetland boundary verification and permitting actions. SITE DESCRIPTION The project site is comprised of three parcels; two contiguous parcels ( Parcel B # 1457500085 and 1457500090} of 7.9 acres and an adjacent parcel ( Parcel A # 3664500141) of 4.8 acres kitty-comer to the northwest. The Parcel A portion of the project site is dominated by a well managed and maintained lawn. A single-family dwelling with a detached shop is located in the eastern portion of Parcel A. The parcel 8 portion of the project site is dominated by a livestock pasture in the south with a single-family residence and barn in the west, and a forested area in the north, the western portion of which has been cleared within the last ten years. The forested portion of parcel B is dominated. by a mixed forested plant community of mature Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesi1) and mature big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum). The project site is generally flat and rolling and two narrow drainage corridor areas are present generally through the center of the Parcel B portion of the site. The eastern narrow drainage corridor is a ditch, created in upland, to convey surface water from the 02154 Lakeridge -1 Wefland/Wildlife Report residential developments to the north. This ditch conveys surface water through the site north-to-south, into the common ditch in the south, then offsite into a culvert at the property boundary. The western narrow drainage corridor is a ditch which was apparently created, within an upland area, in the course of developing the residential sites to the north, and flows south through the center of the B parcel, joining with the eastern ditch, then flowing offsite to the south into a culvert. There is no evidence onsite of a continuous stream channel other than the ditches. BACKGROUND INFORMATION NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAPPING The National Wetland Inventory (NWI) mapping completed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was reviewed as a part of this assessment. This mapping resource did not identify any wetlands or drainage corridors on the project site. (Figure 2). STATE OF WASHINGTON PRIORITY HABITATS AND SPECIES The State of Washington Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) Mapping was reviewed as a part of this assessment. This mapping resource did not identify any Priority Habitats or Species onsite or within the immediate vicinity(Figure 3).. · STATE OF WASHINGTON STREAM CATALOG The State of Washington Stream Catalog for Puget Sound was reviewed as a part of this assessment. This mapping resource did not identify any streams within the project site. This mapping did identify the Cedar River to the south of the project site. The Cedar River was identified to provide habitat for a number of anadromous and resident salmonid fish species. KING COUNTY SENSITIVE AREAS MAPPING The King County Sensitive Areas Mapping was reviewed as a part of this assessment. This mapping resource did not identify any wetland areas or streams within or adjacent to the project site. (Figure 4). SOILS MAPPING A review of the mapping of soil types within the project area completed by the U.S. Soils Conservation Service (SCS) identified that the onsite soils consist primarily of Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (Soils Survey of King County Area Washington, Nov. 1973) (Figure 5). This soil is described as: 02154 Lakeridge -2 WetlandM'ildlife Report AqC -Alderwood gravelly sandy loam: This series consists of moderately well drained soils that have a weakly consolidated to strongly consolidated substratum at a depth of 24 to 40 inches. This soil is on uplands and formed in glacial deposits. A typical pedon of Alderwood soils from O -12 inches is dark brown (10YR 4/3) gravelly sandy loam. From 12 to 27 inches the soil is grayish-brown (2.5YR 5/2) gravelly sandy loam with many medium, distinct mottles. This soil series is .!lQ! listed as a hydric soil. AERIAL PHOTO ANALYSIS Recent aerial photos of the project site were used within the background data collection process. These aerial photos identified that a livestock pasture community and single- family houses dominated the majority of the project site. A mixed forest community was identified to pass generally within a narrow corridor through the eastern portion of the parcel B site. The project site was within an area of large-lot single-family homesites and a number of internal roadways were present through the site. ONSITE EVALUATION -WETLANDS WETLAND STUDY METHODS Presently accepted wetland identification is based on a three parameter criteria test as established within both the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987 Manual) and the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Wash. Manual). These criteria are: 1. A predominance of hydrophytic vegetation. · 2. The presence of hydric soils, and 3. The presence of wetland hydrology. Initial onsite assessment and evaluation was completed during several site visits in September 2002. Specific identification of wetland boundaries was completed on September 10, 2002. Assessment transects were established on a north/south pattern through the project area. Wetland assessment within the project site followed the ! j methods and procedures outlined in both the Wash. Manual and the 1987 Manual. Onsite assessment noted that there were no differences in the identified wetland boundaries as a result to using either the Wash. Manual or the 1987 Manual. Drainage corridors were assessed and identified in accordance with the criteria established by King County and the State of Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) Forest Practice Rules (WAC 222-16-030). The boundary between wetland and non-wetland areas was established by examining the transitional gradient between wetland criteria along transects through the site. 02154 Lakeridge -3 WellandM'ildlife Report • Delineation was performed using the routine methodology for areas greater than five acres as detailed in the 1987 Manual. Field data sheets are provided in Appendix A Identified boundaries were marked in the field with number flagging. These boundaries were then surveyed and made a part of the site plan mapping. FIELD OBSERVATION • Vegetation A mature managed pasture/lawn plant community dominated approximately two-thirds of the project site. This plant community was composed of a wide variety of invasive and seeded grasses. This plant community included colonial bentgrass (Agrostis tenuis), meadow foxtail (Alopecurus pratensis), velvet grass (Ho/cus /anatus}, reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea}, bluegrass (Poa spp.), fescue (Festuca spp.), orchardgrass (Dactylls glomerata), quackgrass (Agropyron repens), bracken fem (Pteridium aquilium}, western yarrow (Achillea tanu/osa}, thistle, cats-ear (Hypochaeris spp), softrush (Juncus effusus), tansy (Tanacetum vu/gare}, dandelion (Taraxacum officina/e), buttercup (Ranunculus repens), curled dock (Rumex crispus} and clover (Trifo/ium spp.). This plant community was identified as non-hydric (i.e. typical of uplands) in character. In the northeastern portion of parcel B, the dominant onsite species was Douglas fir and big leaf maple. These mature trees formed open stands across the treed portion of the site. Additional tree species occurring onsite included Western red cedar (Thuja p/icata), Western hemlock (Tsuga heterophyfla), red alder (A/nus rubra}, black cottonwood (Popu/us trichocarpa), · cherry (Prunus spp), and cascara (Rhamnus purshiana}. The understory included a wide variety of shrubs and herb species including vine maple (Acer circinatum), salal (Gaultheria shallon), Oregon grape (Berberis spp.}, hazelnut (Cory/us comuta), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis}, Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius}, Himalayan blackberry (Rubus procera), evergreen blackberry (Rubus laciniatus), Pacific red elderberry (Sambusus racemosa}, snowberry (Symphoricarpus a/bus}, bracken fem (Pteridium aquilium), and sword fem (Po/ystichum munitum). Throughout the project site this plant community had been altered by prior forest harvest actions. This plant community was identified as non-hydrophytic (i.e. typical of non-wetlands). Parcel A was comprised of a single family hQl!se with a shop with the remainder of the property well maintained and intensively managed as a lawn. The plant community within the central drainage corridor of parcel B that was identified to generally pass from north to south through the site was dominated by a young, mixed deciduous forest and emergent plant community. This plant community had also been altered by prior forest harvest and grading actions which had removed the mature trees, created slash piles, and created an internal ditch across this drainage. Observed tree species included sapling red alder, black cottonwood, and Pacific willow { Salix 02154 Lakeridge -4 Wetland/Wildlife Report • lasiandra). The understory was dense and included salmonberry, Douglas spiraea (Spiraea douglasi1), Western crabapple (Pyrus fusca), Sitka willow (Salix sitchensis), slough sedge (Carax obnupta),horsetail (equisetum arvensis), buttercup (Ranunculus repens), reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea), softrush (Juncus effusus), and lady fem (Athyrium filix-femina). This plant association was identified as hydrophytic in character (i.e. typical of wetlands). The plant community within the south-central portion of parcel B (Wetland C) was dominated by an emergent plant community comprised of reed canarygrass. This plant community had been altered by on-going grazing and pasture management activities. This plant association was identified · as hydrophytic in character (i.e. typical of wetlands). • Soils As identified by numerous sample plots throughout the project site, the majority of the site exhibited a soil profile typical of the Alderwood soil series. The soil was defined as gravelly sandy loam with a soil matrix color of dark brown (10YR 3/3) to brown (10YR 4/4). These soils did not exhibit redoximorphic features such as prominent soil mottles, oxidized root channels, or glayed soil layers within the first 20 inches of soil depth. The majority .of the project site exhibited soil which would not be considered "hydric. • Representative sample plots are identified on Figure 4. (Special note -many more · sample plots were completed during the field assessment than are shown within Figure 4 or reported within Appendix A). Sample plots within the defined drainage corridor that was identified to generally pass from north to south through the central portion of parcel B exhibited a mixed gravelly loam soil texture. These soils appeared to be mineral in character. Soils ranged in color from very dark brown (10YR 3/1) to dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2). Redoximorphic features were present and often very prominent. Soils within these areas exhibited "hydric" characteristics. Sample plots within the depression at the southern portion of parcel B exhibited a mixed gravelly loam soil texture. These soils appeared to be mineral in character. Soiis ranged in color from very dark brown (10YR 3/1) to dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2). Redoximorphic features were present and often very prominent. Soils within these areas exhibited "hydric" characteristics. • Hydrology Onsite hydrology appeared to be the result of seasonal stonnwater runoff from onsite and adjacent properties. In addition, the pattern of surface water movement appeared to have been modified by prior land use activities. These activities have included the development of offsite homesites, the development of roadways and utilities, and the placement of culverts. 02154 Lakeridge -5 WetlandlvVildlife Report The general movement of surface water runoff across parcel A of the site was generally to the south. Surface water through parcel A was captured in boundary and roadside ditches which occurred at the west, south, and east boundaries of the site. Based on field indicators (i.e. water stained leaves, drift lines, surface water, soil saturation, oxidized root channels, wetland drainage pattern) no portion of parcel A met the wetland hydrology criteria of the 1987 Manual and the Wash. Manual. Within an area located in the north-central portion of parcel B, directly south of the new development to the north, evidence of the passage of water was documented. This area was in a small, linear depression, and had been created and impacted by prior land use actions (i.e. compaction, creation of drainage corridor). This corridor was apparently created, through upland soils, during the development of the houses to the north to facilitate the drainage of water collected by the homesites. Based on field indicators (i.e. water stained leaves, drift lines, soil saturation, oxidized root channels, wetland drainage pattern) this linear feature met the wetland hydrology criteria of the 1987 Manual and the Wash. Manual. However, this drainage appeared to be created within an upland area, as evidenced by the soils, and was assuming hydric characteristics as a result of the direction of roof and street runoff through the site. In the northeast portion of parcel B, a storm drain culvert outletted on to the site. This storm drain apparently collected stormwater runoff from the development to the north as well as street runoff. This runoff was directed through a ditch, created in upland, south through the site, joining with the central ditch in the southern portion of the site. Based on field indicators (i.e. water stained leaves, drift lines, surface water, soil saturation, oxidized root channels, wetland drainage pattern) this drainage corridor did not meet the wetland hydrology criteria of the 1987 Manual and the Wash. Manual. Within an area located in the south-central portion of parcel B, evidence of seasonal soil saturation was also documented. This area was in a small depression, and had been impacted by prior land use actions {i.e. grazing, compaction, pasture management). This area received the combined runoff from the two ditches to the north. Based on field indicators (i.e. water stained leaves, drift lines, soil saturation, oxidized root channels, wetland drainage pattern) this depression met the wetland hydrology criteria of the 1987 Manual and the Wash. Manual. WETLAND AND STREAM DETERMINATION Wetland determination was based on sample plots which contained hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology in accordance with the 1987 Manual and the Wash. Manual. Based on these methods one wetland area was identified onsite (Figure 4). No area was identified onsite to exhibit characters typical of a "stream" {i.e. a continuous pattern of surface water movement, either permanent or intermittent). 02154 Lakeridge -6 Wetland/VVildlife Report However, two areas, noted to have been intentionally created in upland areas, directed runoff through the site in parcel B. WETI.AND SIZEONSITE CLASSIFICATION ~NG COUNTY FUNCTION STANDARD (square feet) (USFWS) RATING AND VALUE BUFFER RATING WIDTH C 9,167 PEME 3 low 25feet PEME palustnne, emergent, seasonally ffOOded Wetland C: This wetland was identified within the lower portions of a topographic drainage that passed generally from the central northern boundary to the south boundary of the project site. This wetland was dominated by an emergent plant community comprised entirely of reed canarygrass. This plant community was very dense. This wetland exhibited shallow ponded surface water during the winter and early growing season as a result of topography and the direction of the surface water by the ditches into the area. Soil saturation to the surface was noted to occur within a majority of this wetland complex into the early part of the growing season. This wetland plant community ended adjacent to a culvert inlet at the southern boundary of parcel B. Wetland C was identified to meet the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) criteria for classification as palustrine, emergent, seasonally flooded/saturated (PEME). Based on the size of the wetland and the emergent plant community this wetland complex was identified to meet the criteria for designation a King County Class 3 Wetland. As such, King county mandated the protection of this wetland with a 25-foot buffer as measured perpendicular to the wetland edge. · Ditches: Two ditches transect parcel B of the project site, north to south, approximately through the site, originating at SE 136th Street, proceeding south to the southern boundary of the site, then exiting via a culvert under the property adjacent to the south at the southern site boundary. These ditches apparently convey surface water from offsite through the site. Because these features are entirely artificial watercourses, intentionally created in upland, these ditches apparently do not meet the regulatory criteria for designation as a King County "stream·. WETLAND FUNCTION AND VALUE ASSESSMENT Wetlands are known to perform significant roles in the ecosystem, some of which are of immediate value to society. These roles vary greatly with the size, type, hydrology, vegetation, and location of wetland areas. Although the ecological functions performed by this wetland are complex, interrelated, and difficult to assess and quantify, methods have been developed for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Adamus et al. 1987: Reppert et al. 1979). The functions provided by wetlands include hydrologic support, shoreline protection, stormwater and floodwater storage, water quality, groundwater recharge, and provision of wildlife habitat. 02154 Lakeridge -7 Wetland/WIidiife Report The HYDROLOGIC SUPPORT FUNCTION is defined by the measure of hydrologic stability and environmental integrity which the wetland provides. This function is measured by the frequency of inundation and saturation by tidal actions, stream flow, runoff, and precipitation. Wetlands permanently inundated or saturated, or intertidal wetlands are valued as high. Medium valued wetlands are seasonally flooded or are open water systems that remain saturated during most of the growing season. Wetlands that are intermittently flooded or hydrologically isolated are considered of low value. The SHORELINE PROTECTION FUNCTION is defined by the measure of shielding from wave action, erosion, or storm damage which a wetland provides. This function is measured by the location and width of the wetland along shoreline areas, types of vegetation pr§!sent, and the extent of development along the shoreline. A high value is given to wetlands along a shoreline that have a width greater than 200 yards and dense woody vegetation. A medium value is given to a wetland with a width of 100 to 200 yards, sparse woody vegetation, and dense emergent vegetation. Wetlands less than 100 yards in width and emergent or lacking vegetation are considered of low value. The STORMWATER AND FLOODWATER STORAGE FUNCTION is defined by . the ability of a wetland to store water and retard flow during periods of flood or storm discharge. Wetlands . of larger. size are generally considered to have greater ability to provide this function. In addition, wetlands nearer to urban or potentially develop-able areas are also considered to provide greater flood protections than wetlands which are in undeveloped areas. The WATER QUALITY FUNCTION is defined by the physical, biological, and chemical processes which wetlands provide to naturally purify water. This function removes organic and mineral particulates through natural filtration. In general, wetlands of greater size, more dense vegetation, and those which are close to point sources of pollution are considered to be of higher value. Wetlands which are small (<5 acres), lacking dense vegetation, and not close to point or noniJoint sources of pollution are considered of low value. The GROUNDWATER RECHARGE FUNCTION is defined by the interaction of the underlying geology and soils, and the surface topography. This function provides for the movement of surface water into groundwater systems. Important to this function is wetland size, period of inundation, and depth of standing water within the Wetland. High value is given to permanently inundated wetlands greater than 10 acres in size. Medium value is given to wetlands which are seasonally flooded and 5 to 10 acres is size. Wetlands less than 5 acres in size, isolated, and temporarily saturated are considered of low value. The NATURAL BIOLOGICAL FUNCTION is defined by the complexity of physical habitats and biological species within the wetland area. The value given to a wetland depends upon its ability to provide habitat for nesting (spawning), 02154 lakeridge-8 WetlandNVildlife Report incubation, feeding, rearing, and cover of aquatic and terrestrial animal and fish species. In addition, the ability of a wetland to provide support for varying food chains is an important element in value assessment. Wetlands of high species diversity, three or more habitat types, unique habitat features, large in size, and associated with a permanent stream or tidal marsh are considered of high value. Wetlands with moderate species diversity, two habitat types, moderate in size, and associated with an intermittent stream or high salt marsh are considered of medium value. A low value is given to wetlands of low species diversity, small size, and isolated. These six functions are rated low, moderate, or high, based on the criteria outlined above. These criteria are guidelines compiled from Adamus (1987) and Reppert (1979) and professional judgment must be exercised in assessing these criteria. Overall values for a wetland are assigned, based on a synthesis of individual values. In addition to intrinsic functions, extrinsic functions are also recognized. These extrinsic functions provide social values that have indirect benefits to wetlands .. Education and recreational opportunities are most often mentioned as extrinsic functions. Associated values are often subjective and are thus difficult to evaluate. As such, these functions are not rated, but are nonetheless important when considering creation, restoration, or enhancement projects. ONSITE WETLAND VALUATION Following the function and value assessment process noted above Wetland C was rated as exhibiting a low rating: • Water Quality Benefits -This wetland was small and had been impacted by prior grazing and pasture and land management. This wetland appeared to retain less than 25% of the runoff which occurred within the local area. This wetland also exhibited a limited vegetation diversity as a result of prior grazing. The primary water quality benefit provided by this wetland was a very limited amount of biofiltration of surface stormwater. • Stonnwater Storage -This wetland appeared within a topographic depression and had been impacted by prior land uses. This wetland was located in a rapidly developing part of King County. This wetland was small and exhibited a very limited ability to store stormwater. • Hydrologic Support -This wetland appeared small, and noted to pond a limited amount of surface water early in the growing season. Evidence of seasonal ponding and saturation to the surface was limited. • Groundwater Recharge -This wetland appeared small, and to pond a limited amount of surface water early in the growing season. Evidence of seasonal ponding and saturation to the surface was limited. 02154 Lakeridge -9 WetlandNVildlife Report • Natural Biological Function -This wetland was small, and exhibited a very limited range of plant diversity and vegetation complexity. Available habitat was dominated to young deciduous trees and a dense shrub community. Unique habitat features (i.e. snags, fallen trees, mature trees along the wetland boundary) were absent. This wetland included a large slash pile resulting from prior forest harvest. ONSITE EVALUATION -WILDLIFE WILDLIFE STUDY METHODS The onsite assessment of wildlife species presence and available wildlife habitats was completed as a part of the . onsite assessment of wetland characteristics. This assessment included both early morning and late afternoon observations. . Species presence and habitat utilization were evaluated following the methods identified by Homer and Raedeke (1989) and within U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Publication 80/58 (Mikol, 1980). In addition,· the King · County Wildlife. Study Guidelines (Draft Wildlife Management in King County, Issue Paper, 1993) were also followed to assure consistency with the King County pennit process and documentation of habitat types. Onsite activities documented observations of individual species presence, the general location of the species sighting, and the life history activity being undertaken. Sample stations were established within the site for these observations. This range of observations were documented because for many of the smaller, less mobile species (i.e. small mammals, amphibians) the project site may provide all of their life history requirements (nesting, cover, feeding, and reproduction) while for the more mobile species (i.e. waterfowl, songbirds, medium sized mammals) the project site may be used for only a few of the life history requirements. These more mobile species may depend more upon adjacent habitat for more critical habitat needs such as nesting and cover from predators. It is unlikely based upon the existing site conditions, coupled with adjacent land uses, that species which require large areas of undisturbed habitat would exist onsite. ONSITE HABITAT TYPES The site exhibited one primary habitat type that had been manipulated as a part of past land use activities. A pasture plant community dominated this primary habitat type. This plant community had been created in the development of grazing opportunities for livestock. Included within this primary habitat type were two additional habitat types. 02154 Lakeridge -10 Wetland/\/Vildlife Report As defined by King County, the 'habitat type" best represented within the site was •Agricultural.· The primary vegetation within this habitat type is introduced and cultivated pasture grasses. One additional habitat type was Mixed Upland Forest-low understory. This upland habitat type has been manipulated and modified by prior forest harvest activities. In parcel A, the entire site was managed and maintained lawn. The adjacent properties also exhibited similar land use actions along with the development of single family homesites. The •wet meadow" habitat type was identified as present within the central drainage corridor (Wetland C). This habitat type had also been impacted by prior forest harvest activities and adjacent land uses. This habitat type was comprise entirely of reed canarygrass. PRIMARY HABITAT TYPES INCLUDED MINOR HABITAT TYPES -Agricultural Lands Wet meadow -Residential Mixed Upland Forest-low understorv PLANT AND ANIMAL SPECIES OBSERVATIONS Agricultural Lands: The majority of the 12-acre project site was identified to be dominated by a pasture grass plant community. The primary plant species were introduced and cultivated pasture grasses. Tree cover was limited to individual trees, Douglas firs. Avian species observed within this coniferous upland forest habitat type included tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor), song sparrow (Melospiza melodia), American crow (Co,vus brachynchos), American robin (Turdus migratorius), house finch (Passer domesficus), Steller's jay (Cyanocitta stet/en), black-capped chickadee (Parus atricapil/us), varied thrush (/xoreus naevius), and rufous sided towhee (Pipi/o erythrophthalmus). These avian species were feeding throughout this habitat type with the greatest number of observations noted along the edge between this pasture and the upland forested habitat type. This habitat type also appeared to provide cover to many species that also used the adjacent areas, particularly the residential areas. Mixed Upland Forest A portion of the project site was identified to be dominated by a mixed upland forest plant community. Total crown cover exceeded 60 percent. The primary tree species was Douglas fir that had been retained following prior forest harvest. Additional tree species indude Western hemlock, big leaf maple, western red cedar, hawthorn, cascara, black cottonwood, and red alder. The understory was dense and composed of a wide variety of shrubs and herbaceous species. Avian species observed within this coniferous upland forest habitat type included tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolo(), song sparrow (Me/ospiza melodia), dark eyed junco (Junco hyemalis), American crow (Corvus brachynchos), American robin (Turdus migratorius), golden crown kinglet (Regulus satrapa), bushtit (Psaltriparus minimus), house .finch (Passer domesticus), Steller's jay (Cyanocitta stellen), pine siskin (Cardue/is pinus), black-capped chickadee (Parus atricapil/us), brown creeper (Certhia americana), ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbel/us), varied thrush (lxoreus naevius), rufous sided towhee (Pipilo 02154 Lakeridge-11 Wetland!Wlldl~e Report erythrophthalmus), Northern flicker (Co/aptes auratus), and hairy woodpecker (Picoides vi//osus). These avian species were feeding throughout this habitat type with the greatest number of observations noted along the edge between this upland forested habitat type and the pasture areas. This habitat type also appeared to provide cover to many species that also used the adjacent areas, particularly the residential areas . . A number of nests were observed onsite and appeared to have been used during the 2002 breeding season. A limited number of stumps and snag trees are present within this plant community. These stumps and snags appeared well utilized as feeding areas by a wide variety of avian species, particularly hairy woodpeckers, creepers, and Northern flicker. A few of these snags also exhibited a limited use by pileated woodpecker (Drpocopus pileafus). Mammal species observed within this habitat type included deer mouse (Peromyscus manicu/atus), shrew (Sorex spp.), opossum (Didelphis virginianus), Douglas squirrel (Tamiasciurus douglasii), mountain beaver (Aplodontia rufa), raccoon (Procyon /otor), and black tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Wet Meadow: An emergent wetland area was identified in the southern portion of parcel B portion of the project site. This wetland represented less than 5% of the total project area, had been greatly modified by prior pasture management and grazing activities, and was dominated by an emergent plant community of reed canarygrass. Grading has enhanced an existing swale that ran through the property. Avian species observed within this freshwater wetland · habitat type included tree swallow, violet green shallow (Tachycineta thallassina), barn shallow (Hirundo rusfica), song sparrow, dark eyed junco, and American robin. These avian species were noted to use the "edge" between the mixed wetland habitat type and_ the pasture habitat type. Many of these avian species were feeding and seeking cover either within this wetland habitat type or within the adjacent upland forest plant community. This wetland plant community did not include any woody habitat features. As identified the apparent length of surface water ponding resulting from water retention by the wetland would be inadequate to provide spawning habitat for amphibians. MOVEMENT CORRIDORS As identified by onsite wildlife trials, small and medium size mammals appeared to be moving throughout the project site and into the adjacent areas. The larger of these trails (many of which are logging roadways and draglines) also appeared to be used by domestic cats, domestic dogs, horses, and neighbors. 02154 Lakeridge -12 WellandN\lildlife Report ( ~ PRJORITY SPECIES Two wildlife species identified by the State of Washington as "Priority Species· were observed onsite during this assessment. Black tailed deer and ruffed grouse are noted by the State of Washington as a "priority species· because these species are regulated as "game• species. The project site may also provides suitable habitat for other game species such as mourning dove (Zenaida marroura) and band-tailed pigeon (Cofumba fasciata). STATE CANDIDATE SPECIES A single "State Candidate• species -the pileated woodpecker -was observed to utilize the forested areas onsite. State candidate species are presently under review by the State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) for possible listing as endangered, threatened, or sensitive. WDFW has developed a list of recommendations for management of the pileated woodpecker that focused on the preservation of nesting habitat. As defined by WDfW the most popular nest trees are typically hard snags with bark and broken tops within riparian areas. REGULA TORY CONSIDERATION · The proposed alteration of lands defined by various federal, state, and local authority rules and regulations as ''wetlands" raises environme·ntal 'concerns that are generally addressed in the development review process. These concerns center around the development's potential adverse impacts to the structure, function, value, and size of these ''wetland" areas. Such adverse impacts may . include a reduction in wildlife habitats, reduced surface water quality, reduced. water retention, a reduced ground water recharge rate, reduced plant species diversity, and the reduction in the function and value of other associated wetland and non-wetland characteristics. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS -Section 404 Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) prohibits the discharge of dredged or fill material into 'Waters of the United States" without a permit from the Corps of Engineers (Corps). The Corps has jurisdiction over freshwater systems waterward from the ordinary high water line of a water body or waterward from the upland boundary of the adjacent wetland. The definition of fill materials includes the replacement of aquatic areas with dry land, grading which changes the surface contour of a wetland, and mechanized land clearing in wetlands. For the purposes of Section 404 permitting the Corps makes the final determination as to whether an area meets the wetland definition and would be subject to regulation under the Corps program. · Currently the Corps has two specific types of permits which apply to wetland fill proposals. These two types are a series of specific Nationwide Permits and the 02154 Lakeridge -13 WeHandNVildlife Report Individual Pennit. The Nationwide Permit process identifies specific categories of work that can be undertaken following a set of specific conditions applicable to each Nationwide Permit number. For example; NWP#12 allows for the limited, short term impacts to wetlands for the placement of utilities, and NWP#14 allows for a limited . impact to wetlands as a part of the development of a roadway crossing. The Corps has noted several times within information papers, documents, and workshops that a project proponent that places fill within a wetland without specific Corps authorization does so at the proponent's own risk. The Corps requires an Individual Pennit where a proposed activities within an identified jurisdictional wetland area can not be authorized under one of the Nationwide Permits. Within the Individual Permit process the Corps undertakes a much more in- depth review of the proposed project and the proposed impacts. The Corps must evaluate whether the benefits derived from the project outweigh the foreseeable environmental impacts of the project's completion. STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Proposed action undertaken through either of the Corps of Engineers processes (Nationwide, Individual, or isolated) are also subject to the provisions of the Washington State Department of Ecology Water Quality Certification Process. Projects that may be exempt from Corps of Engineers Section 404 jurisdiction may still require review by the Washington State Department of Ecology to ensure consistency with State water quality protection provisions. KING COUNTY -"Environmentally Sensitive Areas" Ordinance 21A.24 • Wetland and Stream Classes King County regulates activities in and around wetland areas. Such regulations also require that an undisturbed native vegetation buffer be retained along the upland side of the identified wetland areas. To assist in this regulation the County has defined classes by which to regulate wetlands, streams, and their associated buffer area. These categories are based on such features as size; the presence of endangered or threatened plants, fish, or animals; regionally rare wetlands; wetlands of local significance for wildlife or stormwater functions; the number of wetland classes and subclasses; and percentage of open water. A Class 1 Wetland means a wetland assigned the Unique/Outstanding rating in the King County Wetlands Inventory, or any wetland which meets any of the following criteria: 1. The presence of species listed by the federal government or state as endangered, or threatened, or the presence of critical or outstanding actual habitat for those species; 02154 Lakeridge -14 Wetland/Wildlife Report 2. Wetlands having 40% to 60% permanent open water in dispersed patches with two or more classes of vegetation; 3. Wetlands equal to or greater than ten acres in size and having three or more wetland classes, one of which is open water; or 4. The presence of plant associations of infrequent occurrence. A Class 2 Wetland means a wetland assigned the Significant #2 Rating in the King County Wetlands Inventory; or any wetlands which meet any of the following criteria: 1. Wetlands greater that one acre in size; 2. Wetlands equal to or less that one. acre in size and having three or more wetland classes; 3. Wetlands equal to or less than one acre that have a forested wetland class; 4. The presence of heron rookeries or raptor nesting trees. A Class 3 Wetland means a wetland assigned a Lesser Concern '1#3 Rating in the King County Wetlands Inventory, 1983, or uninventoried wetlands that area equal to or less than one acre in size and that have two or fewer wetland classes. King county defines "Streams" as those areas in King County .where surface waters produce a defined channel or bed, not Including irrigation ditches, canals, storm or surface water run-off devices or other entirely artificial watercourses, unless they are used by salmonids or are used to convey streams naturally occurring prior to construction in such watercourses .. · · • Required Buffers King County has established a standard buffer to be applied to a wetland or stream to assure protection of the wetland function and value. This buffer area is measured perpendicular to the defined wetland edge or perpendic;ular to the identified ordinary high water mark of a stream. WETLAND STANDARD BUFFER CLASS WIDTH 1 100 feet 2 50 feet 3 25feet King County allows the standard buffer to be modified where such actions would provide additional protection to wetlands or enhance the wetland's functions (21A.24.320.B). Buffer averaging may be allowed as long as the total area contained in the buffer on the development proposal site does not decrease and the minimum width of the final buffer is not less than 65% of the standard buffer width. 02154 Lakeridge -15 WetlandNl/ildlife Report ' I SELECTED ACTION PLAN The Selected Action Plan of the Lakeridge project site focuses on the creation of independent lots suitable for the development of single-family homesites consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan. A primary feature in the creation of these homesite lots will be the establishment of a . protective buffer adjacent to the identified onsite wetland consistent with the King County Environmental Sensitive Areas Ordinance. The creation of these homesite lots will not require the adverse impact or placement of fill within identified wetland area or buffer. 02154 Lakeridge-16 WetlandJI/Vildlife Report FIGURES 02154 Lakeridge-17 WetlandlvVildlife Report ) HABITAT TECHNOLOGIES .. J r ST i. i :::. . SE 131ST ST < sr J 131ST '"'-' 11 :::. PL v, < SE 132ND SE 132ND ST / / SE PL /~ ~ , :~ fg ~1~ :::. SE 134IB .-.. ST . -<i; C I zt ~, 1--':':=-+--'--!:::~1 STL 1~: U.66Qa I • ' ;:,;; I G;l . Figure 1 Site Vicinity ' l ! ' i i j ' ' HABITAT TECHNOLOGIES •"i . , . .. ; . Figure 2 NWI Resource Mapping I • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I j I / I I I ~ J I I I I HABITAT TECHNOLOGIES 1~ . .. Figure 3 PHS Resource Mapping • • ..... • • • .. ... HABITAT TECHNOLOGIES , ,. , . . , .,. .... ,._ :. .,,,. ~... .• ~-.k • , <~ • ,.· . ,-.;; •· .... • • ----- ··-· ... • s ., •. ..... • . ,. Jt..,:.;r. "'6·'-". .. ---.. . . . _ ... ~ .. . ~-.;.., .. .: . .. .•. • ;.t·,~~·::~"' .. • • ,. . -•. • • . .. .,_. Ill •••• • • •. ,. •• • .. • •• • .•. • .. • • .. • ... .. ,. • • Figure 4 < Soil Mapping REFERENCE LIST Adamus, P.R., E.J. Clairain Jr., R.D. Smith, and R.E. Young. 1987. Wetland Evaluation Technique (WET); Volume II: Methodology, Operational Draft Technical Report Y-87, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Cowarclin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Gole~ and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Office of Biological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, FWS/OBS-79/31. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical Report Y-87-1, US army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss. Hitchcock, C.L., A Cronquist. 19n. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press. Seattle, Washington. Homer, R.R. and KJ. Raedeke. 1989. Guide for Wetland Mitigation Project Monitoring. Washington State Department of Transportation. contract number GC8286, task 6. King County Department of Natural Resources. 1993. DRAFT Wildlife Management in King County: Issue Paper. · .. Mikol, S.A 1980. Field Guidelines for Using Transects to Sample Nongame Bird Populations. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service publication FWS/OBS -80/58. Reppert, R.T., W. Sigleo, E. Stakhiv, L. Messman, and C. Meyers. 1979. Wetland Values -Concepts and Methods for Wetland Evaluation. Research Report 79-R1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Fort Belvoir, Virginia. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soils Conservation Service. Soils Survey of King County Area Washington, Nov. 1973. Washington State Department of Ecology. 1997. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Publication Number 96-94. Washington State Department of Fisheries, Catalog of Washington Streams and Salmon Utilization, Volume 1., 1975 02154 Lakeridge -18 WellandM/ildlife Report . ' ·1 APPENDIX A FIELD DATA FORMS 02154 Lakeridge -19 WeijandM'ildlife Report Data Form Routine Wetland Determination Pmjecl/Sfte: Lakeridge Applicant/Owner. Lakerldge Development lnveollgator: M. Heckert [No) HIVII ~. soils, or h)'drolovy been dJslurbed1 [No) I& the area a potential problem am? Wetland Data Point SP 1 Job Number: 02164 Date: Septe111bet 10, 2002 City: County: King Slate: WA Vegetation ---~·-··· CommonN;I!!!'! str'!(um -" Cover lncllcator Yes Popu/us tlichocaq,a Collon-Wood T-80 FAC Yes Poa pratens/s Bluegrass,Kantucky Hetbaceoos 100 FACU+ 'II, Species that are OBL, FACW, ar FAC (axcepl FAC-): IIO Remarfol appears to drain well Hydrology [Nol Recorded Data(~ In remarks) [Nol stream, Lake, "'l1de Gage (No) Aerial Phctograph (Nol Other (deocribe In remarks) Field ObseMltions: Deplh of SUrface Wate,(11.): 0 Depth to Free Water in Plt(ln.): >24 Depth to Saturated Sotls(ln.): >24 Remarla! mowed and managed lavm appears to drain \WII Soils Cowardln Classillcallan: Welland Hydlology lndlcatots (Nol Inundated (No) Saturahld ii upper 12 Inches [No] W1/l.er marks [No) Waler lines (Nol s.dlment deposils (Nol Drai,-patterns in weUands (No) O>d<frzed root channels In upper 12 Inches [Nol Water.Qained leaWs (No] Local soil surwy - [Nol Other (explain In remarks) Depth Matrix Color Mollle Color MolUe Ttldl.lre, Concrellon$, OnJ.._ ... ___ (Mun;sell Moist) _____ {Mtnell Moist} ___ Abundanc8/C _________________ Rltlw,pheres, etc. -·------·-.... --- 0 to 6 10YR 313 nona grawlly loam ~-~.!~-!.~-~-... _ .. _ _ ____ none --------------------gravellyloam _ .. _ .. ____ .. ____________ _ Hydric Sols 1nmca1ots · [NoJHlotosol (Nol Hlstic Epipedon [Nol Sulfkfic Odor [No) Pmbable Aqultic Moist Regime [No) Reducing Conditions (No] Gleyed ar Low-Chroma Colors Uni Name: Drainage Class: Remarks appears to drain well Wetland Determination [Nol Hydrophytlc V~ Pltsent [No) Hydric Soils Present [No) Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks wetland criteria NOT met appears to drain- [No] Concretion& (No] High Organic 'II, In Surface Layer (No] Organic Sln!aking (No) U-on Local H)'lrlc Soll& Lisi IN<>! Listed on National Hydr1c Soils List [Nol Other (e,q,lain In remarks) (No) This Data Point is a Welland Page 1 of 9 Data Form Routine Wetland Determination Projec:1/Slle: Lakeridge Appiicant/Owner. L1lulrldge Davelop,_ lnveollgalDr: M. Hec1<art [No) Have wg-.. soils, or hyltolagy been dlsturbm? [No] Ill the area a poCentia1 ,,.-... 7 Vegetation Wetland Data Point: SP 2 Job Number: 021114 Data: Seplember 10, 2002 City: County: Klng Slate: WA Dominant _ S2";11s ·-·····-·-----·-··--Common Name·-·--··---··-··-·-···--stratum _____ %Cover ___ lnd"icator --· Yes RJJ/JUs Procerus P .J. llulll. Blac:ld>eny,Hlmalaya Sh.ub 30 FACU Yes Polygonumcwpida/JJm Knolwled,Japmese Herbaceous 40 NI No PhawfsanmdnacM Grass,ReedC3nary Herbaceous 10 FACW 'II, Species Ula!.,. OBI., FACW, or FAC (e>«:epl FAC-): I Remaiks 8Pf*11S ID cnfn well Hydrology [No) Recorded Dala (describe In ...-narks) [No) S1ream; lake, or T"'8 Gage (No] Aerlal Pholog.aph [No] Othe{(descrlbe In rema.b) Field Obseivations: Depth of Surface wate.11n-): 0 Deplh ID Free Waler In Ptt(I,.): >24 Depth lo Saturated SGils(ln.): >24 Remarb N central by N boundary appear& ID drain well Soils Cowardln Classi!icellon: Wettand Hydmlogy lndcators [No) lnimdated [Nol Saturalecl In Upper 12 Inches [No] Wm marl<& [No] Water lines [No] S«limenl deposits [Nol Dl8inage patterns In wotlands [No) Oxkf.zed mot channels In upper 12 Inches [No] Water-atalned - [No) I.Gcal soil sur,ey data [Nol Other (9"Plaln In .emarks) Depth Matrix Color Motlle Color Mollle Texture, Concrelions, (In,} ______ (Munsell Moist) _____ Q,1unsell MoislL .. Abunclance/Cont _______________ Rhjzo8pheree, etc.·-·········-············--········ Oto18 10YR3'3 none gravellyflll Hydlic Sols lndcalors [No) HislOISOI [No) Histic Eplpodcn [No) Sullidlc Odor [No) ,,_ Aqultic Moist Regime [No] RedlJclng Conditions [No) Gleyed or low-Chroma CGlars UnlName: Drainage Class: Remarlcs _...todialnweH Wetland Determination [No) Hydrcphytlc Vogelalion Present [No] Hydlic Soils Present [No] Wetland Hydrology Present Rerna'1<s wetland criteria NOT mot appoma to drain W9ll [Nol ConCietions [No] High Organic % in SUrface ~ [No) Organic Streaking [No] Uated on 1.Gcal Hydnc Soils list [No] Uated on Nat!onal Hydric Soils USt [No] Other (explain In iemarl<a) Taxonomy. [No] Field Observations match map [No] This Dala Point Is a Wetland Page 2 of 9 Data Form Routine Wetland Determination Project/SIie: l.akarldge Appllcant/Owner. Lalceridge Development lnvesllgator: M. t.kert [No} Have •egetatlo, ,. so,ls, or hydrdogy been dialurted7 (No} Is the an,a a poCBntlal ~ an,a? Vegetation Wetland Data Point SP 3 Job NWTiber: 0215' Date: Sepla1iber 10, 2002 City: c...nty: King s.-wA Dominant __ Species_ -----Conman Hane-··--···-·-·--·--··-Slralum__ "Cover.. Indicator __ Yes Juncus Elfllsus L Rush,Soft H...-30 FACW Yes AQtDSl!s Tonu/s Sl>III. BenlQlllSli.Colonial Hartacoaus 30 FAC Yes Agropy,on twpens Quackgrass Hwteceous 30 FACU % Species that ... OBL, FACW, <r FAC (mccepl FAC-): 16 Remalfal old road bed Hydrology [No} Recorded Data (desaibeln nimarks) [Nol stream, lake, or TIiie Gaga [No} Aerial Photograph [No) Other (deocl1beln nmartos) FleldO-.ations: Depth cf Sutlace Waterfm.): 0 Depth to Free Water In Pll(ln.): >24 Ooplh to saturated Soils(ln.): >24 Remarks NW corner appears to drain \WI! Soils Wo~and Hydlology lndcalr>,s [No) Inundated [No) Saturalld In upper 12 inches [No) Water maltcs [No) Waler Bnes [No) Sedlment deposls [No) Dralnage patterns In wetlands [No) OxidlZed n,ot ct.nnels In upper 12 Inches (Nol water-<lfained leaws · [No) Lccal aoff survey data (No) other (explain In ramarla;) Depth Malrfx Color Mottle Color Mottle TIOlluni, Ccrlcnltions, O,,.J .... _____ (Munsell_MoistJ ___ _i_Mtr1sell Molstl. ___ Abundance/Contrast __________________________ Rh@Phen!s, etc.--------·-··--·--·------ 0 to 8 1 OYR Y.l none gravelly fill ---···-··-------------------------------------··--·--···--·-----------······-------------··-···-····----·-·· Hydtic Sais lndcators (NoJHlstoool. [No) Histic Epipedon [No} Su!ridlc Odor [No} Probable Aquitic Moist Rogime [No} Reducing Conditions [Nol Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colara UnltName: Ora._ Class: Romarlal geo tech fabric at 8"' Wetland Determination [No} Hydrophytk: Vegetation Present [No) Hydric Seils Present [No) Wetland Hydrology Present Remuks wut!and crurla NOT met appears to dru, well [No) Concretiona [No) High Organic % In Surface Layer [Nol Organic Streaking [No) Uated on l.oc:af Hydric Soils Uot [Nol Uoted on National Hydi1c Seils List [No} other (explain In remaib) Taxonomy: [No} Field ObsaMltions match map [No) This Data Po4nt Is a Wetland Page 3 of 9 Data Form Routine Wetland Determination Praject/Slle: Lakeridge Applicant/Owner: LakeJidge Development lm.e&tiOalOI . M. Hedlert [No] Haw w,gelallol,, soila, « hym>lagy been dlslurtled7 [No] ls the...,. a pol8ntlal pn,t,lem ana? Vegetation Wetland Data Point SP 4 Jab Number: 021114 Date: Sep1ember 10, 2002 City: Ccunty: King Stale: WA Dcmnant _s~ -----· Comnon Nana -----·---------" Cover __ Indicator _ Yn A/n/JS rubra Alder.Red Sh11Jb 20 FAC Yes Salx/aslancha -.Pacltlc Shrub 30 FACW+ No Populus tJtchocarpa CollDn-Wood sap Shnm 30 FAC 'lft Species Iha! are OBL. FACW, « FAC(except FAC-): 1DO Remarks Hydrology [No] Recorded Data (describe In rwnarks) [No] SlrNm, Lake, «Tide Gage [No] Aerial Phatog,"!'h [No] Other (descrll>e h """""'") Field Observalions: Depth of Sl#face Water(ln.): 0 Depth to Free Wat.er In Pl!(ln.): >24 · Depth to Saturated Sols(H1.): >24 Remar1cs small pre,,oiuafy-filled ~ Soils Weiand Hydiology lndcalots [No] Inundated [No] Salura!ad In upper 12 Inches [No] Wat.er merks (Yes] Water Ones [No] Sedinwlt deposits [No] Drainage paltems In wetlands (No] O>ddizOd root c:hannels In upper 12 Inches [No] WaJ.er-elained leaYes [No] local soil survey- [No] Other (explain In remarb) Depth Matrix Color Mallle Color Mottle Texlu"', Concretions, (!n.L. ___ (Munsell MolstJ _..tMunffll).1olstL_ Abundance/Contrast_. _____________ Rhlzospheres~etc. --------·--·-·----·-·· Oto 12 10YR 413 ncne gravelly 12 to 18 10YR 2512 -····--·----------~---·--·-···-·---------silly loam---------------------------- Hydtic Sols lmlcalors [No]Histosol [No] Hisllc Epipedon [No] Sullldlc Odor [No] P.-Aquitlc Moist Regime [No] Reducing Cor-. ]No] Gleyed or Low-Ctuorna Colons U.nl Name: Drainage Class: Remarks prier ftlled dopr-.i Wetland Determination (Yes] Hydrophytlc Vegetalfon Plaent [No] Hycfric Soils Present [No}Wellancl Hydrology Present Remarks -.ndClileriaNOTmet -rstodralnwell [Nol Co11cretiol,s [No] High Organic % In SU!face layer (No] Organic Slreoklng (No] Listed on LDcal Hydric Soils Lisi [No] Listed on National Hydric Soils Lisi (No] Other (explain In nomar1oi) Taxonomy: [No] Field ObserVallons match map (No) This Data Point Is a Wetland Page 4 of 9 Data Form Routine Wetland Determination Projed/Site: Lalcerldge AppllcanUOwner: Lakertdge Deve1opmei1t lnvesligalor: M. Hecllert [No) Have vegetation, soils. or hydn,k,gy been dl&turbed7 [No] Is the area a polenllal probiom area? Vegetation Wetland Data Point SP 5 Job Number: 021114 Dale: September 10, 2002 City: County: King Stale: WA Dami,_ _ Specles_····----·-------···-·-Conmon.Name -··-·--·---·-···Stratum ·--% Caver _ lndic:alor ·-· Yes Thuja pkata Cedar,Wastem Red Tree 40 FAC Yes Ranunc:utu. acds Butter-Cup.Tall He!taceoua eo FACW- Yes Pseudolsuga /lAenz/ffi Fir,Douglas Tree 80 FACU" No Agn,s6s T,nuls Slblh. Benlgrass,Colonial Herbaceous 10 FAC ----------·-·····-----------------·····-····-···-------------------·--------------------------·-····---·-·····--·-- '16 Species Iha! ara OBL. FACW, or FAC (except FAC-): 81 Remarlcs ·-to drain - Hydrology [No) Recorded Data (descrille In -) [Nol Stream, Lake. or Tide Gage [Nol Aerial Pholo!Jraph [Nol Other (describe In remarb) Field Obse<vations: Depth of Surface Walef(in.): 0 Depth to Free Water in Pil(m.): >24 Depth to Saturaled Soils(ln.): >24 Remarlcs appears to dlain well Soils Wetland Hydlology ln<lcatots [Nol Inundated [Nol Saturated In upper 12 in,;hes [No) Waler marlcs [No1w•11nes [Nol Sediment deposits [Nol Dnllnage patterns In wetlands [Nol Oxldlzedn>OI channels In upper 12 Inches [Nol Waler~ leaws [No) loclll lOil SUN8)' - [Nol Other (e>pain In remarks) Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color M-Texture, Concretions, ()n.) ..• _._.CMunaall.Moist) •...• {Munsell Moistl.. .. Abundanca/Contrast .•...••...••... --····Rhizospheres" Ille .. __ ······-····-···············-·· o to 18 1 OYR 2.5.12 nona manure dump p,le ------------------······-·····---·--···---------------·--·----------------------------------------------------- Hydrit; Sols lntlcatots [No] Hlslosol [No] Hlsttc Epipedon [No) SUlfldk: Oder [No) Probable Aqulllc Moist Regime [No] Red\lcing Ccnditions [No) Gleyed or Low-Chroma COiors Unit Name: Drainage Class: Remarks manure dtJlr4, pole Wetland Determination [Yes] H)'drnphytlc v~ Present (Yes] Hydric Salls Present [No] Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks manure dump pile appears to drain well lNo] Concretions (No) High Organic '16 In Slll1ace Layer [No] Organic Streaking [No) Listed on Local Hydric Solis Lisi (No) Listed on N-Hydrle Soils List lNol Other (o><plain In nomarl<s) Taxonomy: [No] Field Observations match map lNo) This Data Point is a Welland Page 5 of 9 Data Form Routine Wetland Determination Project/Site: L.alceridge AppllcOm/OWner: Lakerklge Owolo;.1.e,,t I~ M. Hectcert [No] Haw ,ege1a11on, oolls, ... h)Uiolagy been dlsluilled? [No] ls the an,a a potential problem area? Vegetation Wetland Data Point SP 1 O Job Number. 02164 Date: September 10, 2002 Cily. County: King State: WA ~I __ S@ecles -------·--·--· Conman Name -·-·-·--·----Strahan -·%Cover ___ lndk:ator ·- Yes Agrr,stis IIJba L Redlop Herbaceous 100 FAC' ·--·--·----···-.. -.. ---- % Species 1hat are OBL, FACW, m-FAC (except FAC-): 100 Remail<s appears 1D drain well no -chara. Hydrology [No] Reccnled Oa1a (desa11le in nimarlcs) [No] Stream, Lake, or TIiie Gage [Nol Aerial Pholag.aph [Nol Other (describe in ll!ffllllks) Field Observations: Depth of Surface Waler(11.): O Depth 1D Free Wat.er in Pil(ln.): >Z4 Depth 1D Saturated Soil&(n): >24 Remarks no hydro charaeterlstlcs appean, m drain well Soils Cowardin ClassificatJon: Welland Hyd/ll/ogy Indicators [Nol Inundated [No] Sliluraled in upper 12 inches [No] Wat.er marks [No] Waterlines [Nol Sediment deposits {No] Drainage patterns in wetlands [No] Oxi<izi,d root channels In upper 12 Inches [No) water-stained leaves [No] Local soll survey data JNol Other (explain In ""11alks) Depth Matrix Color Mettle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions, /in.) ............ (Munsell.Mois!J._ .. _!Munsell Moist) __ Abundance/Contrast _________________________ Rhizospneres, etc. ·····----···········-···-··- 0 1D 8 10YR 2.5/2 none sandy loam 8 to 16 . 10YR 313 ········--··--------""'!' ___________________________ grawlly loam-···········-·······························-· HydlicSolslndcalors [No] Hlstosol [No) Hisllc Epipedon [Nol SUllidlc Odor [Nol -Aquilic Moist Regime [No) Reducing Conditions [Nol Gleyed or Lew-Chroma Calors Uni Name: Drainage Class: Remall<s no reclox appears to drain well Wetland Determination (Yes] Hydrophylic Vegetation Present [No] Hydrlc Soils Present [No] Wetland Hydmklgy Presenl Remarks -criteria NOT met appears to drain well [No] Concretions [No] High Organic % In Surface Layer [No] Organic Snaking [Nol Llated on Local Hydrlc Soils List [No] Listed on National Hydric Soils List [No] Other (explain in remarks) Taxonomy: [Nol Field Observations match map [Nol This Data Point is a Wetland Page 6 of 9 Data Form Routine Wetland Determination Prcject/Slta: Lakerldge Applicanl/OWner. Lakeridge Denlopment 1...-;gator: M. Heckert [No) Have vegetation, S<>ls, « hydmlogy been distw1>ed? [Nol Is the an,a a potential prol>lem area? Vegetation Wetland Data Point SP 11 Job Number. 02154 Date: September 10, 2002 City: County: King State: WA Domnant Species __________________ Cannon Nane ________________ Slralum _____ % Cover Indicator Yes Pfla/ans ammfnaCN Grass,R-canary Herbaceous 100 FACW % Species that are OBL, FADN. or FAC (e,o;epl FAC-): 100 Remarks -to drain poorly root 01/'f Hydrology !Nol Recorded Data (descnbe in remar1<s) !Nol S11eam, Lake, or 1lde Gage !Nol Aerial Photograph [NoJ Other (describe In rernarf<s) Field Obsefvations: Deplh of Surface Watef(ln.): o Deplh to Free Water In Pl(m.): >24 Depth to Saturated Soils(ln.): >24 Remarks appears to drain poorly Soils Cowardin C-PEME Welland Hydro/ogy lndcah>ls [Nol Inundated [Nol Saturated In upper 12 Inches (YesJWolermarks [NoJW.-llnes (Nol Sediment deposifs (Yes) Drainage pa11ems in weUanda (Yes) Oxidized root channels in upper 12 inches [Nol water-elained - [Noj Local soil -data [Nol other (explain In remad<s) Depth Matrix Color MoWe Color Mottle Te,cture, Concre!lons, QnJ ________ (Munsen MolstJ_ ___ (MunseU MoistL.. Abundance/Contrast-·--·--·-···-·-Rhiznspheres_,_atc. ····-······-·········-···--·-··· Oto 18 1 OYR 2511 none silt loam Hydtic Sols lndcaiots [NoJ Histosol [Noj Histic Epipedon [Noj Sullicf,c Odor (Yes) Probable Aquillc Moist Regane (Yes) Reducing Concfrtions (Yesj Gleyed or l.a,v.Chrotta Colors Unit Name: Drainage Class: Remarks appears to drain poorly Wetland Determination (Yes] Hydrophylic Vegetation Present (Yes) Hydric Soils Present [YasJ Welland Hydrology Present Remarks wetland criteria MET appears to drain poorly [Nol Conctelions (Yesj High Organic % in SUrface Layer !Nol Organic S1reaklng [NoJ Listed on Local Hydric Soils list [No) Listed on National Hydric S<>ls List (Nol Other (explaln in remar1<s) T """"""'Y' [No] Field ObselVallons match map (Yes] This Oala Point is a Welland Page 7 of 9 Data Fonn Routine Wetland Determination Projecl/Site: l..al<eridge Applicanl/Owner. Lalleridge Development lnvestigalcr. M. lleclrert {No) Haw vegetation, tolls, or hydrology been disturbed? {No) Is the area a potential prcblem area? Vegetation Wetland Data Point: SP 15 Job Number: 02154 Date: s.....-10, 2002 City: County: King State: WA . Daminant Species··-·-·····-------·-Common Name··--··-··-··-·-··--······-····· Stratum··-····--··% Cover ___ Indicator .... Yes Juncus cffusus L Rush.Soft HetbaceoUs 30 FACW Yes Phlllads atUndnat:H Glllss,Reed Canary HOfbaceous 50 FACW No Ag,ost/s 1/ba Redlop Hell>aceous 10 FACW 'll, Species that an, OBL, FACW, ..-FAC (exoept FAC-): 100 Remarl<s appean to drain well no RIO! oxydatlon Hydrology {No) Recordm Data (descr1be in remarks) (No] stream, Lake, orlldeGage {No] Aerial Phctograph (No] other (describe In remarlcs) Field~ Deplh of Surface Wms("n.): 0 Depth to Free WrJsr In Plt(ln.): >24 Deplh to Saturated Soils(ln. ): >24 Remarlal at edge of depression 8""'""" ID drain Mil Soils Wetland Hydrology lnclcalols [No) Inundated (No) s.turated In upper 12 inches (No)Wmsmarks [NoJ Water r,nes (No) Sediment depoSIIS [No] Drainage patterns In wollanda [No] Oxidized R>OI channels in upper 12 inches [No) Waler-leaws [No] Local soil SUM!)'_ [No] Other (e,cplain In remar1o>) Depth MatrlX Color Mctl!e Color Mottle Texture, Concretions, ()n.}. ______ .{Munsell Moist) ___ ~JfflSell McislL .. Abundance/Contrast ______ ·····-··-···--············-Rhizospheres, ate.··-······-·················-········· Oto 6 10YR 3'2 none compacted gravelly learn 6 to 1 B 10YR 313 ·-····-······--·-·---·---···--·~·-·-··---··----···-·-·-···--compacted gravelly loam···-·-·····-····-········ Hydtic Soils lndcator.; [No) Hiotasol [No] Hlslic Eplpedon [No] Sullidlc Odor [No] Probable Aquilfc Moist Regime (No) Reducing Conditions [No) Gleyed or Low-Chroma C-.. UnttName: Drainage Class: Remarks severely compacted appe,us to -well Wetland Determination [Yes] Hydrophytlc V~on Present (No] Hydric Soils Present [No) Wetland Hydrology Present Remar1cs -criteria NOT met appears ID drain well [Nol Concretions [No} High Organic 'll, In Surface Layer [No) Organic Streaking [No] Lioted on Local Hydrfc Soils Liot [No) Lioted on Nelional Hydric Soils Liot [Nol other (explain in n,marlcs) Taxonomy: [No) Field Obse!Vations malcil map [No) This Data Point Is a Wetland Page 8 of9 Data Fonn Routine Wetland Detennination Project/Site: Lakeridge Applicant/Owner: Lokafidge Development lnvesligalcr: M. Heckert [No] Have vege!atlon, soils, or hydrology been disturbed? [No) Is the area a pclentiaJ ~ area? Vegetation Wetland Data Point SP 18 Job Number: 02154 Date: Seplember 10, 2002 City: County: King State: WA Dominant __ spec;v ---------------Conwnon Name ____________________ Stratum __________ % Cover Indicator ___ _ Yes Phalarlsarun<fnacea Grass,Reedcanary llertlaceous 100 FACW ---------··--------·--···--·------------------------------····-···------------- % Species 1hat ant OBL, FACW, or FAC (except FAC-): 100 Remar1os appears ID drain poor1y Hydrology [No] Recorded Data (describe in renarks) [Nol st.in, Lake, or Tide Gage [No] Aerial Photograph [No) Other (describe in 191nalks) FieklObseM!lons: Depth of Surface Wa!er("n.): 0 Depth lo Free W-in Pll(m.): >24 Depth to Saturated Sals(in.): >24 Remadai appears to drain poorly Soils Cowarain CJasaificallon: PEME Welland Hydrology lndcatots [No) Inundated [No) Saturated in upper 12 Inches [Yes] W-mar1cs [No)WatsrDnes [No] Sediment deposits [Yes) Drainage pattems In wetlands [Yes) Oxi<fized n,ct channels in upper 12 Inches [No] Water-stained leaves [No] Local sol SUM!)' data [No] other ("""'3in In remarks) Depth Matrix Color Moll!e Color Mottle Texture, Concretions, (Ol.).__ ____ ... (Munsell_Molst) ____ jMunseD Moist)·---Abundance/Contrast _____________________ Rhlzospheres,_etc. ___________________________ _ 0 lo 18 10YR 2.512 10YR 516 prom and conm,n concr911ons silly loam --····---------------------------------------------·-····--------------------------·--·----------------·--·----------------------------------- Hyd!lc Sols /n<lcators [No)Hlstosol [No] Histlc EpJpedon [No] SuJfldlc Odor [Yes] Probable AquHic Moist Regime [Yes) Reducing CcndiUons [No] Gleyed or Low-Chroma Cclor& Unit Name: Drainage Class: Remarks CGmpaC!ed appn,s to drain poorly Wetland Detennination [YesJ Hydrophytlc Y~ Present [YesJ Hydric Soils Present [Yes] Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks W9tland criteria MET appears to drain poor1y (Yes] Concrellons [Yes] High Organic 'IL In Surface Layer [YesJ Organic streal<ing (No) Listed on Local Hydric SolJs List [No) Listed on Naticnal Hydlic Soils List [No) Other (explain In remarks) T """""'"Y- [No] Field ObseMtions match map [Yes] This Data Paint Is a Welland Page 9 of9 SEE DRAWINGS) LIBERTY GROVE/ LIBERTY GROVE CONTIGUOUS SUBDIVISION Preliminary Recreation Plan 35 sets (EXISTING) !;fa''''!b''·''))fy';'4ill'';M';;.;ff?IJi:<';!V<;gz:'t0:Lg',Wis;l';'i4-~<'')/''.''/2''y§ Zill<' L.iis!S\f ---__ · ... ~~=--- HALT DRl:~PHAL~'./@Wfl~>~--~~t~~rus// -:, ~~:.~~ o \ /// ...... ~. ---'\ r __s--', () . lsFR \ l._ • L'-:::_r ~ ,.- 29' Ll! i 5;f . '<!-.,'});,; ~· I'--\ t'l /I-~-, \ f o· t 20· _ \0 o' \ ®;I; I: \\: I 1 \H'. ~ I ~ \ 10 \'\t>.R "\ 11 .\1.G'3 - 1 --=--'--0 -48()... -0 '\ 0 "'l!J' '\ :s:. ,r a Xl 25' 145 7 J N; . " ' ~AQf .· ;O~N Wayne Jo/'{s 1 ~SPA~E Lakerjdge 4"~lopm n~c. 5 \ / PO Box 146 \ S \ Renton, WA 980$z \ .,._ \ \. / t'l 6::--.. 0 " ,..... " / \ \ / \ vra ,·., . ' ' -' ~ I ~ _ l~\J ~--- '-' 1, \_ '-' U fooo~ 5 !': ,-...,. •, I\.. ,..l' C . i~ 01~ , -< SEE DRAWINGS)