The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReport 1Yvonne Bui Lakeside Real Estate Investments, LLC PO Box 69563 Seatac, WA 98168 tel: (206) 666-4123 (owner/ applicant) Bret Churchill 18624 114th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98055 (party of record) Trishah Bull, PPMIII CPLN LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) Kris Langley, Traffic Engr PARTIES OF RECORD LAKESIDE REI SHORT PLAT LUA09-003, ECF, SHPL-H Rich Hudson R and D Enterprises 21936 234th Avenue SE Maple Valley, WA 98038 tel: ( 425) 432-4806 eml: rd-enterprises@comcast.net (contact) Roger & Kelley Pfluger 18621 116th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98058 (party of record) Molly Johnson, Develop Engr ERS LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) Arlene Mariano, PPM! Owen B. Hille Cramer Northwest, Inc. 945 N Central Avenue ste: #104 Kent, WA 98032 tel: (253) 852-4955 (contact) Steve Bottheim, Supervisor CPLN LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) Curt Foster, Engr III ERS LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) Judi Moe, ASII RD SERV DIV MS KSC TR 0231 CPLN LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 CPLN LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) Brian Norton, Engr II ERS LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) Kelly Whiting, KC DOT RD SERV DIV MS KSC TR 0231 ' (party of record) Updated: 04/02/09 ' (party of record) Carol Rogers FGMU DDES ' (party of record) John Baskin 11419 SE 186th Street Renton, WA 98055 tel: (425) 255-8213 (party of record) ' (party of record) Steve Townsend, Supervisor LUIS LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) (Page 1 of 1) CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: March 7, 2012 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. . -~---. ~--'-----'----~-~----· Project Name: Lakeside REI Short Plat • LUA (file) Number: LUA-09-003, ECF, SHPL-H ; Cross-References: King Co. File #LOSSOOOl, King Co. Variance File #L07V0075, ' LUA09-079 -Lakeside Fairwood Short Plat ; j AKA's: \ Project Manager: Gerald Wasser ' Acceptance Date: March 19, 2009 . Applicant: Yvonne Bui : Owner: Lakeside Real Estate Investments, LLC • Contact: Same as applicant : PID Number: 3223059113 i ERC Decision Date: •, ERC Appeal Date: :· Administrative Denial: . Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: . Date Appealed to HEX: · By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: i Date Appealed to Council: 1 By Whom: i Council Decision: Date: ' Mylar Recording Number: • Project Description: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing . Examiner approval of a Short Plat for the subdivision of a 1.36-acre site into 7-lots for the eventual : development of single-family residences with tracts for access, a Category 4 wetland, and · recreation/drainage. King County has previously approved a Road Standards Variance (Road ) Variance L07V0075l for this oroiect. j Location: 18621 116'h Avenue SE ; Comments: Planning Director sent a cancellation letter to applicant due to an already approved l plat under LUA09-079. Denis Law Mayor Department of Community and Economic Development. March 1, 2012 Yvonne Bui · 3520 South 198tli Street. SeaTac, \NA 98188 SUBJECT: Lakeside Fairwood Short Plat (LUA09-079) Dear Ms. Bui, Alex Pietsch, Administrator This qffice has reviewed your request to extend the approved Lakeside Fa.irwood Short.Plat. In May, 2007, you filed an application for the Lakeside RE.I shoit plat with King County for th.e subject property. King County transferred that project to the City of Renton in 2008 (City File No·. LUA09-003). The Lakeside REI Short Plat has been "on-hold" per yol!r request while you pursued the Lakeside Fairwood Short Plat designed per Renton's development regulations. The Lakeside Fairwood Short Plat (File LUA09-079) was approved by Re_nton on October 5, 2009. Short plat approvals are valid for two years, with the possibility of a one-year extension. As your request for extension was _receivetl after October 5, 2011, we considered the project to be "expired". Subsequently, you\vrote a letter requesting that an extension be granted due to extenuating-circumstances, including the engineer responsible for monitoring the status of your project passed away suddenly in 2010; and you were unaware of the expiration date. In · a_ddition based on your experience with King County, you expected the Citywould contact you with a reminder or status letter prior to. the expiration.· \Ne have considered your request based on the unique situation and circumstances presented and have determined that your request to · extend the short plat approval is reasonable: Therefore, the short platwill be.valid for two years from the date-of this letter. This approval is grantea only for the Lakeside Fairwood Short Plat due to extraordinary circumstances unique to the project ·and requires that you understand we are cancelling the former King County project, the Lakeside REI sho'rt plat. Future homes · constructed on the short plat will be subject to the City of Rento.n's Residential Design Standards w_hich will be reviewed at the time of building permit application. · · · You should be aWare that this"is the only extension that will be granted. lfthe final short plat is not recorded by March 1, 2014 it will expire and cannot be extended again. C.f. "Chip" Vincent · Planning Director cc: May.or Denis law Alex Pietsch, CED: Administrator Neil Watts, Development Services Director Jennifer He-nning, Planning Manager ·Ge"rald Wasser, As~ociate P[anner · StacyTucker,.Secretary Carrie Olson, Engineering Specialist Project File · Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov January 5, 2012 Alex Pietsch, CED Administrator Department of Community & Economic Development 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 SUBJECT: Lakeside Fairwood Short Plat LUA-09-079, SHPL-H, ECF Mr. Pietsch, 1 am writing this letter to request your ovessight on. my effort to obtain a one year extension on the above referenced short plat. The follow,ing recaps a short history, our ci.rcumstances and why we feel the allowed city code extension is appropriate. When I spoke with Gerald Wasser/Associate Planner on January 4, 2012, he informed me that my project had expired 3 months ago on 10/5/2011 and I was told that I had to basically reapply and restart the whole short plat process over again. Short platting this property has been very frustrating and costly. I have spent a lot of time and energy with this process since it started with King County in May 2007, let alone over $60,000 on this project under King County's jurisdiction. When our property was annexed into Renton I resubmitted the short plat which initiated more costs due to dty fees, however city staff helped throughout the process and we received preliminary approval. I want to emphasize city staff has been very professional and extremely helpful throughout the city's review, however your assistance on obtaining the full expiration period on our short plat is the purpose of this letter. In my preapplication meeting with Renton on April 30, 2009, it stated that, "Expiration: Upon approval, the preliminary short plat is valid for two years with a possible one year extension." There was no other written instruction in the preapplication meeting notes or my preliminary approval letter that I had to request for one year extension in writing. I assumed this extension was granted automatically. In addition, there was no effort made by the City of Renton to notify me that my short plat was about to expire unless action is taken like other cities or counties do. I am not a professional land use expert and when I hired engineer, Jim Jaeger, who has since passed away in 2010, to perform all the work required for this short plat, I assumed he had taken care this extension when I started this short plat with him. Also, due to the continued depressed economy, it was not feasible for me to complete my project. As I started th is Jetter, your overview and interpretation of the appropriate city code is needed to authorize staffs extension of the short plat approval. I have read RMC 4-7-070M which covers one year extensions, or the expiration period of a short plat. The title Expiration Period provides an all-inclusive time period of a maximum of three years to complete the short plat. The specific code is not ambiguous in that the title "Expiration Period" is referenced in the last directive " .... May grant a one extension ... not more then one year ... .if such request is received ... prior to the expiration of the short plat" I read this as a request received within the third year should be granted since it didn't state received within the two year approval granted on the short plat. Lastly to provide more support when going through a short plat, even RMC 4-7-070A Detailed Procedures for Short Subdivisions, under Purpose states: ... "avoiding placing undue burdens on the subdivider .... " If starting the short plat process over entirely isn't an "undue burden" I don't know what is since all I am seeking is approval of the allowed third year extension. To summarize, I'm not asking the city to defend how it has historically interpreted the expiration of short plats, I am requesting your objective overview on interpreting the granting of my third year to finish the short plat. The granting of this third year will avoid a significant costly burden as well as time delays due to having to start the process all over again. Given the amount of city staff time that has taken place on my project, the poor economy, the lack of notification that was not given to me, and the unexpected death of Mr. Jaeger, whom I relied on, I plead that you accept my request under these circumstances. Thank you for your consideration and if it would be helpful to have a meeting with you, please do not hesitate to contact me. Respectfully, Yvonne Bui, home owner Cell : (206) 280-2272 3520 S 198th St Seatac, WA 98188 Email: bui_yvonne@hotmail.com cc: Mayor Denis Law DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM April 8, 2009 Jerry Wasser .cZ Sonja J. Fesser ~ Lakeside REI Fairwood Short Plat, LUA-09-003-SHPL Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and l have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: The dedication of land for street purposes on short plats requires approval by the City Council. Said dedication is achieved via a recorded City of Renton Dedication Deed document (form is provided by the city). If the dedication is to be recorded with the short plat, the dedication process needs to be timed in such a way that Council approval and all other matters pertaining to the dedication have been addressed and resolved, and said document is ready to record. The Deed of Dedication document includes both a legal description exhibit and a map exhibit. The legal description exhibit should be prepared, 'stamped, dated and signed by the applicant's surveyor. The surveyor should also prepare the map exhibit. The dedication process requires an updated title report, to be dated within the 45 days time-frame prior to Council action on said dedication. Talk to the Project Manager if there are questions or further information is needed. lfthe access tract is not to be dedicated as right of way, then this short plat needs to be submitted to the city as a PLAT, as it subdivides into more than 2 lots, tracts, sites or whatever. Information needed for final short plat approval includes the following: Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA-09-003-SHPL and LND-20-0544, respectively, on the final short plat submittal. The type size used for the land record number should be smaller than that used for the land use action number. \(I:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-20 -Short Plats\0544\RV090409.doc April 9, 2009 Page 2 Show two ties to the City of Renton Survey Control Network with published values. The geometry will be checked by the city when the ties have been provided. Provide sufficient information to determine how the short plat boundary was established. Provide all bearings and distances for that portion of the subject property that is to be dedicated to the city for street purposes. Note the date the existing city monuments were visited, per WAC 332-130-150, and what was found. Provide short plat and lot closure calculations. Indicate what has been, or is to be, set at the corners of the proposed lots. Note discrepancies between bearings and distances ofrecord and those measured or calculated, if any. Note all easements, covenants and agreements of record on the drawing. The lot addresses and short plat street name will be provided as soon as possible. Note said addresses and street name on the short plat drawing. On the final short plat submittal, remove all references, on the short plat drawing, pertaining to topog lines, utilities facilities, gravel, concrete, retaining walls, edge of asphalt, concrete vertical curb and other items not directly impacting the subdivision (Sheet 2 of2). These items are provided only for preliminary short plat approval. Do note encroachments. Remove the "DEVELOPER/OWNER INFORMATION", "SITE ADDRESS" and "ZONING, SERVICE & UTILITY INFORMATION" blocks from Sheet I of 2. Remove all three "TREE LEGEND" blocks, the "STORM DRAINAGE" block, the "MANHOLES" block, the "SITE DISTANCE NOTE:" block, the "VERTICAL DATUM" block, the "BENCHMARK" block, the "CONTOUR INTERVAL" block and the majority of items listed under the "LEGEND" block on Sheet 2 of 2. Item No. 2 under the "NOTES" block is also not needed. Note the research resources on the short plat submittal. The City of Renton "APPROVALS" block, noted on Sheet I of 2, is in error. The City of Renton Administrator, Department of Public Works, is the only city official who signs/approves this short plat. There is no Manager of Land Use Services Division and no Development Engineer. Add "KING COUNTY" to the county's approval block. All vested owner(s) of the subject short plat, at the time of recording, need to sign the final short plat submittal. The latest title report reviewed (dated January 11, 2008) states that the vested owners are Chuc T. Nguyen and Yvonne T. Bui. It is noted that there are four signature lines and H:\File Sys\LNO -I ,and Subdivisioo & Surveying Recorci<;\LND-20 -Short Plats\0544\RV090409.doc\s April 9, 2009 Page 3 two acknowledgment blocks shown on Sheet l of 2. Is there a reason for four signature lines if there are two vested owners? If ownership of the subject property has changed hands during the past year, provide a new Plat Certificate noting the new ownership. Change the "DEDICATION" block title (Sheet I of2) to "OWNER'S DECLARATION". The dedication block currently shown is better suited for a long plat than for a short plat. Review and revise as needed. Remove the King County "Seal" (upper left-hand corner of both drawing sheets). The "SHORT PLAT NO L0850001" is a King County number. Replace with the city's "LUA" and "LND" numbers. The two tracts (the Wetland tract and Drainage and Recreation tract) should be "named". Use Tract A and B, or Tract 1 and 2, or other. Include a statement noting who is to own said tracts. Is there to be a Homeowners' Association created, in part, for this purpose? The current position of the city regarding ownership of wetlands and drainage and recreation tracts pertain to the subject short plat, and should be noted on the final short plat submittal (if a Homeowners' Association is created) as follows: Upon the recording of this plat, Tract "A" is hereby granted and conveyed to the Short Plat of Lakeside REI Fairwood Homeowners' Association (HOA) for a wetland tract. All necessary maintenance activities for said Tract will be the responsibility of the HOA. In the event that the HOA is dissolved or otherwise fails to meet its property tax obligations, as evidenced by non-payment of property taxes for a period of eighteen (18) months, then each lot in this plat shall assume and have an equal and undivided ownership interest in the Tract previously owned by the HOA and have the attendant financial and maintenance responsibilities. Repeat the above statement for Tract "B", the drainage and recreation tract. Otherwise (with no Homeowners Association), use the following language on the final short plat drawing: Lots 1 through 7, inclusive, shall have an equal and undivided ownership interest in Tract ''A" and Tract "8". The foregoing statement is to be accompanied by language defining the maintenance responsibilities for any infrastructure located on the Tracts serving the short plat or reference a separate recording instrument detailing the same. It is assumed that the access tract will be dedicated to the city, in addition to the 12' wide strip along 116 11 ' Ave SE. Is this assumption correct? If true, it would seem that the two parcels should be dedicated as one parcel. See the very first paragraph in this memo concerning dedications. 1-1:\File S)'s\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-20 -Short Plats\0544\RV090409.doc\s April 9, 2009 Page 4 Note that if there are easements, restrictive covenants or agreements to others (City of Renton, etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the short plat. The short plat drawing and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. Reference the associated document(s) on the short plat drawing and provide spaces for the recording numbers thereof. Comments for the Project Manager: Is the city collecting fees for this short plat? Is the access tract to be dedicated to the city for streets, along with the 12' strip? If not, this short plat application is really a plat. H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-20 -Short Plats\0544\R V090409.doc\s City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Svcs coMMENTs ouE, APRIL 2, 2009 APPLICATION NO: LUA09-003, ECF, SHPL-H ( #LOS0001 FILE DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 19, 2009 APPLICANT: Lakeside Real Estate Investments, LLC PLANNER: Jer Wasser PROJECT TITLE: Lakeside REI Renton Short Plat PLAN REVIEWER: Jan Illian SITE AR EA: 1.36 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA ross : N/A LOCATION: 18621 116th Avenue SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA ross N/A I WORK ORDER NO: 78010 M CITY OF RENTONS SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner approval of a Short Plat for the subdivision of a 1.36-acre site into 7-lots for the eventual development of single-family residences with tracts for access, a Category 4 wetland, and recreation/drainage. The site generally slopes to the north. The project is vested to King County regulations and is being processed in the City of Renton. King County applicable zoning is R-8. The proposed density is 5.15 dwelling units per gross acre. Lots would range in size from 4,002 to 4,683 square feet. The site would be accessed from 116th Avenue SE via the access tract ending in a temporary cul-de-sac easement. King County has previously approved a Road Standards Variance (Road Variance L07V0075) for this project. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housino Air Aesthetics Water Linht!G!are Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14.000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date # ,_,,~Y o CITY vF RENTON :~· 4~" ~~ Department of Community and .a '"-Economic Development ~<0 NrfIT~-De_n_i_s L_•_w_, _M.;ay_o_r __________________ .;.A;.;.le;.;.•;.;.P;.;.i.;.et;.;.sc;.;.h;.;.•.;.A;,;;d.;;m;.;.i;;;ni;;;st;;.r;;;•t;;.o;.;.r __ March 27, 2009 Rich Hudson R and D Enterprises 21936 234th Ave. SE Maple Valley, WA 98038 SUBJECT: Lakeside REI Renton Short Plat LUA09-003, ECF, SHPL-H "On Hold" Notice Dear Mr. Hudson: The Planning Division of the City of Renton is in receipt of your letter of March 25, 2009 requesting that the above-captioned project be placed "on hold". We understand that this request is to allow the applicant time to consider changes to the project. At this time, your project has been placed "on hold". Please contact me at (425) 430- 7382 if you have any questions. SincE / Associate Planner cc: Yvonne Bui /Applicant/ Owner See Attached / Party( ies) of Record ------I-05_5_S_o_uth_G_rad_y_W_ay--~R-e-nt_o_n,-W-as_h_in_gt_o_n_9_8_05_7 ______ ~ @ ThiS pa~rcrn,tains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE ·. Yvonne Bui Lakeside Real Estate Investments, LLC PO Box 69563 Seatac, WA 98168 tel: (206) 666-4123 (owner/ applicant) Bret Churchill 18624 114th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98055 (party of record) Trishah Bull, PPMIII CPLN LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) Kris Langley, Traffic Engr PARTIES OF RECORD LAKESIDE REI SHORT PLAT LUA09-003, ECF, SHPL-H Rich Hudson R and D Enterprises 21936 234th Avenue SE Maple Valley, WA 98038 tel: (425) 432-4806 eml: rd-enterprises@comcast.net (contact) Roger Pfluger & Kelly Jaco 18605 116th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98058 (party of record) Molly Johnson, Develop Engr ERS LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 , (party of record) Arlene Mariano, PPM! Owen B. Hille Cramer Northwest, Inc. 945 N Central Avenue ste: #104 Kent, WA 98032 tel: (253) 852-4955 (contact) Steve Bottheim, Supervisor CPLN LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) Curt Foster, Engr Ill ERS LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) Judi Moe, ASII RD SERV DIV MS KSC TR 0231 CPLN LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 CPLN LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) Brian Norton, Engr II ERS LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) Kelly Whiting, KC DOT RD SERV DIV MS KSC TR 0231 ' (party of record) Updated: 03/27/09 ' (party of record) Carol Rogers FGMU DOES ' (party of record) John Baskin 11419 SE 186th Street Renton, WA 98055 tel: (425) 255-8213 (party of record) ' (party of record) Steve Townsend, Supervisor LUIS LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) (Page 1 of 1) .... • • • II .. . .. ,. - R and D Enterprises 21936 234th Ave. SE Maple Valley, WA 98038 425-432-4806 (OJ 425-660-8700 (F) 206-384-7392 (C) rd-enterprises@comcast.net PERMIT CONSULTING SERVICES CITY OF RENTON D RECEIVE MAR 2 5 2009 March 25, 2009 City of Renton BUILDING DIVISION Department of Community and Economic Development Planning Division, ATTN: Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE: Request to Place Lakeside REI Renton Short Plat on Hold File No. LUA09-003, ECF, SHPL-H The applicant for the above referenced short plat is requesting to have the project placed on hold. Additional information on the project is being assembled and the applicant will need additional time to evaluate the project. Please place the project on hold for 60 days which will allow the applicant time consider any changes to the project. Additionally, can you please note that the Project Contact Person identified on your Notice of Application and Proposed Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated (DNS- M) should be changed to Rich Hudson, R and D Enterprises. You have the applicant properly identified however I'm providing consulting services for the applicant on this project. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~id'll~ R and D Enterprises cc: Lakeside REI, LLC Larry Krueger, Cramer NW Inc. From start to finish and everything in between! NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE LAND USE NUMBER: LL!J\0~-3·}3 CCF. S'--1-'L-H ,.King Coucly F,le LOeSOQ01) PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION The appl can I 1s reques\1r1~ E'"'"'~mental {SEPAi Review ;i,1d Yeanng E~aminer approval ol a Shor. f'IJt lo· the subd"·1s,on of J I 36-acre s,le nlo 7 -lots for th;, eventu><I ,:Jeveloprnent of s,ng:e-farn,ly res.Jences .,;di 1racs for access. a C<>teg<Yy 4 wctlamj ond recreat,cnldra,nage. The s,le general•y slo>""s ta 1he no'lh The pro1ecl :s vested :o K,nq Counly rcgu:Dhons a11d ,s be<n<,; processed ,r lne City of Renton. Kw.g County appl,cable zomng ,s R-8 The ~ropo$ed density ,s 515 d•,vdiinq J,111'.-per gross acre Lols woulC range ,n size from 4,002 lo 4.683 sq,.,.,e fe~t Tim si:e ,.,oul<i he ;accessed 'ros·, 11Glh Avenue SE ·.ia the a,:;ces5 tracl e'ldmg 1n a temporary cul-de-sac ease,n>ml K1,og CoL11ty ha, prn•:,nusly ap;>ro·1ed " Road S:andard~ V,wanw 1Ro;,d Variance >_07V0075l to, th,s pro1ecl PROJECT LOCATION: 1862' 116" A,enJe '.iE OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED {ONS-M) A~ lhe l.e;,C Avency, lhe City ol Renton has cletcrrr,,ncd \nJI ~,gn,focJnt en,ircnmerr.JI ,,.,,p,K'i> ~re u1i1<e1·1 to resu'.t 'rom lhe. propnsP.d r•o,e.c<. Tlw.refore as per11 11 tted un~er th~ '"-CW ~" 21 C. 1 10. tt-,e C,t1 ol Hen:on 1s using lhe Op\1on8I ONS-M µ""'"'ss to g,v,., now.e th al a DNS- M 1s 11k,:,I; tc br issued Ca-nms:nt periods 'or ths: ~.-o1ect and t1e araposed ONS-M ar~ 1nlAg,a1~d ,n1n a single comment pc Md. T~cre will te n.:, cc1umen: oer cd lobN ng t~e 1ssua~ce of the Tl-r~stwl(I ri .. 1~rm,n;i:,r,n nf Nnn-S19nit:cance- Mit1gated iDNS Ml ,,. ',4 d")' JppNI per,o(I ,,,1 folio,,., t1e ,ssuan~e o' :tie ON."i-M PERMIT APPLICATION DATE KP<j c,,,,nly .l~,.u~r'! 17 200A • City of Rec.Ion: Jariuary 27. 2009 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION' l<".,rq ;~~,_,nt,' Febr•Jar; IS, ,C,()fl, '-•') ,>1 R~n1on M;irr.h '9. 2009 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Yvonne Bui. Lakeside Real Estate lnves1ments, LLC Tel {206) 666-4123 Permits/Review Requested: Environment~! (SEPA1 rteview, Hearing E,aminer Short Plat approval Other Pormrts which may be required· B"rlding, Ut,t,ty, and Construction Permits Requested Studies Leoel I Drn'1naQC Siudy. We-!lanci Study, and Preliminary Technical Report Location where appl1c.at1on may be reviewed PUBLIC HEARING CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW Zon;ng/Land Use Environmental Documents that Evaluate th~ PropoHd Project Development R&gulatlons U5ed For Project Mitigation Oepari:mcnt ot Community & Econorrnc Development (CED)-Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton Ci\Y Hall. 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 9B057 P•Jbl1c '1corin;i ,, 1ent;il1ve1y scherJu,e(I fnr April 2B 2009 hefore t.~e Renton Hlli!dlli; E<am,rer 1n Renton Cou1c1I Cham!Jers Hearn1ijs be~,n al g-00 AM an lh~ ?1h lloor c,f :tie sew Henion Cely H~I: locnlMI a\ 1055 Suuth Grady Way -,~ s~b1ec1 site .s :Jes19na1ej Re~"'""''~I • 8 (R-8: on King Counly's Zoning Map O:nvrnn,1en\al , SEP.".i Chec;klisl. Welland Determ1nalior,, Preliminary Technical lrforrna11or Repocl. Level · Dra,nage Ac,aly,;,s. Prelin1.,wy Technical lnforma<,nn Re part ""it,e prqecl ,v,t, he s.i'a1ec1 to ·.h,:, C(:f of Renlons and Kmg Cou1111's SEPA or:J ,w,ce. Kir,;.i Cc,,wl\'' Df'velapment Rc,:;ulat1on> and other ~ppl1c~t>!e codes on,', ,., __ q,;~J,cws as ~r•oro,iri~t .. Proposed Mit1gatlon Measures T~c fcll~v,1ng Mili[Jalron Measures will l,~.eiy t>e ,mposed on the prop d T ese reco·nme~ced M:ligotio1 l/easure~ a~dr ,. c,se prqecl _ . _ '·fl ex1s11r1g codes a'id req~lat,ons as c,t.,d abcve ess prq,,c\ lmpacls nr.t r,o·;e'ed 'r,e app,rca.~I will be r~qu,rad ro Pi>! lhe app.'o,nriiile r,an.w•octa/lOn M,1,gar,or: F~a. !!re aopt,~ar:/ mil be reqw,,,,1 /o r,Jy 11,P approprrrlle lire /.1/tiyat,o.~ !"e<> The Hpp/,i;.Jn/ will be TfiO'.!imd to pJy rh~ appropnare c>arks M'/.-gM!On FtJe C:omplian~e mlh '"cammendatliJns of the Wetland D..t8 rmmaliorr: and Campli~n,<' .+1/I. rh,. r~wmme1,dal,ons of/he Dramd<Je r,;>port Comments .on the abova application must be submitted in w. Planning Oov1sion, 1 055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 9BOS;'ting ~o Gerald Was~e,, Associate Planner, CED _ tentat,vely scheduled for a public hearing on Apr"I 28 2009 ' by 5.oo PM on Aprol 2, 2009. This matter ;5 also City Hall, 1055 Soutl" Grady way. Renton If you are ',,.,te.:ested ;nat 9 .00 AM. Courc.,I Chambers, Sevent11 Floor, Ren Ion Ser.·,ces D,v,s.nr, to ensure rhal the hearing has n ,1 b 11 tlMt"'J lhe hearn,g. please contact Ille De,..,,lop,nent su1,m,tted ,n .,,,,1,ng t,y the date ind,carnd abovs: ym.'ma·e~t,u'!~c eduaed at {425) 4.>0-7282 If commenls ~nnol be !Jrop;sal before the H~aring Exammer 1r yoJ have queiiions a~:~rthi~ 111 ~ hearing "nd oresf'nl your co,nments on the ;ind , eceioe add;l1onal 1r1/or:nation by mail plense c n·a 1 ·t P OPOSill. or wish lo be made a party pf record w,11 m,tornati:al,y become J parly uf record. and will b O ' ~f '~e p;OJect manage, Anyone •tJhc submits ·.vrrt\er, commenls e nu 1 1e~ of any dec1s,nn on this proiect CONTACT PERSON: Gerald C. Wasser, Associate Planner: Tel: (4251 430 _7382 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION ::::~;~e:::;=;~rt)' of reco;C to rece:ve ~ f · ,storm <lrld m•urn lo. Cily of Renlon CEO_ Plan .. 0 , n or~la\ion on (his p;opos12d proiect. co,,1pleh'! l1 1 • • • • f'll,g IVl,,1011. 105~ So. Gr~dy Wa,; Ranto,i. ',VA 98057 ie, Fil~ No La~esrde REI Renton Sliorl PlattLUA09-00], EU. SHPL-1-1 ;K,ng Cou1ty File L0.%0001', . \ME , \!LING ADDRESS LEPHQNE NO CERTIFICATION I~ M9£f?_M,reby certify that 3 copie were posted by me in conspicuous places or nearby th escribed SIGNED: • CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT· PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 19th day of March, 2009, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter, NOA, Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT documents. This information was sent to: Name Agencies -NOA, Env. Checklist, & PMT See Attached Yvonne Bui Owner/Applicant Richard Hudson, R&D Enterprises Consultant Owen B. Hille, Cramer NW, Inc. Engineer Parties of Record See Attached Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only See Attached (Signature of Sender):_,-·~ m~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker Reoresentina signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for !,l{~«nes and purposes mentioned in the instrument. $"'~'\_ YNN ~,,,, ~".:_1,"Y:_.,•Ci\\\"l1t1,-"1t/f1. -w-"" cot1, f ,,.,.,. ::: J~---' ~~~ ,1 ~ Dated:_o~)-~~J_o~'\~- Sate· of ~as ington ':1, ., ,r -• -·, , ;,-~ ~ , ,._ (!)~ "° :: = Notary (Print):_-¥0\j\LJIY\cu.ib...,lA-~CL-----'l,""-¥"~1"uk"u.....µU"'o-'--l~"""1~"""<=..!.N...:.~~.-1'i<~'......,,,.,v,;.lt-L",-.c,;,.,...-.;-;,l·"Fa:- My appointment expires: o 7 -~,':.1;:1,,;,1-19_\1J~$A..~ ;;) '"\, •\O ,,, 0i"111"~:.<:,~ 111 WAS~,.,. I h \\\\\\\\'" Notary Pub 1c in and for . Project Name: Lakeside REI Renton Short Plat Project Number: LUA09-003, ECF, SHPL-H template • affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology • Environmental Review Section PO Box47703 Olvmoia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region• Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers • Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers • Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olvmcia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW • Larry Fisher• Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. • 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer Issaquah, WA 98027 39015-172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office • Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program • 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division• Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation• Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Gretchen Kaehler 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olvmcia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Steve Roberge Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities State Department of Ecology Real Estate Services NW Regional Office Attn: SEPA Coordinator 3190 160'" Avenue SE 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 ·Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the notice of application. template -affidavit of service by mailing Yvonne Bui Lakeside Real Estate Investments, LLC PO Box 69563 Seatac, WA 98168 tel: (206) 666-4123 (owner/ applicant) Bret Churchill 18624 114th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98055 (party of record) Trishah Bull, PPMIII CPLN LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) Kris Langley, Traffic Engr PARTIES OF RECORD LAKESIDE REI SHORT PLAT LUA09-003, ECF, SHPL-H Rich Hudson R and D Enterprises 21936 234th Avenue SE Maple Valley, WA 98038 tel: ( 425) 432-4806 eml: rd-enterprises@comcast.net (contact) Roger Pfluger & Kelly Jaco 18605 116th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98058 (party of record) Molly Johnson, Develop Engr ERS LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' ( party of record) Arlene Mariano, PPMI Owen B. Hille Cramer Northwest, Inc. 945 N Central Avenue ste: #104 Kent, WA 98032 tel: (253) 852-4955 (contact) Steve Bottheim, Supervisor CPLN LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) Curt Foster, Engr III ERS LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) Judi Moe, ASII RD SERV DIV MS KSC TR 0231 CPLN LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 CPLN LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) Brian Norton, Engr II ERS LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) Kelly Whiting, KC DOT RD SERV DIV MS KSC TR 0231 ' (party of record) Updated: 03/20/09 ' (party of record) Carol Rogers FGMU DOES ' (party of record) ' (party of record) Steve Townsend, Supervisor LUIS LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) (Page 1 of!) -, 9 I I 7000230/L08SOOOI ANDERSON KYLE D+LORI L 11257 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA 98055 9 I 17000200/L08SOOO I BASKIN JOHN 11419 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA 98055 9 I J 7000070/L08SOOO I BRADLEY ROBERT F JR 11412 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA 98055 9117000180/L08SOOOJ CASTRO JULLIAN C+WILLIE M JR I 1435 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RN/L08SOOO 1 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 6197800100/L08S0001 DEMARIA JEFFERY 18608 116TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 6197800023/L08S0001 FAIRCHILD MARK V 18416116THAVESE RENTON WA 98058 91170001 OO/L08SOOO 1 GIRON JAMES R+DELEE A 11248 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA 98055 2329850050/L08SOOO 1 HEFNY SABRY SALEH+WEISNER LESLIE A 11425 SE 185TH PL RENTON WA 98055 6197800163/L08SOOOI KERI LANETTE R 11618 SE 188TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2329850130/L08SOOOI AOANAN CARMELO P+MARY U 11416 SE 185TH PL RENTON WA 98055 9117000210/L08SOOOI BOLIN RICHARD N+BOLIN GRACE 25716 SE 398TH ENUMCLAW WA 98022 6197800082/L08SOOOI BROWN MABEL L 18444116THAVE SE RENTON WA 98058 9117000190/LOSSOOOI CHOJIMMYH 11427 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA 98055 9117000050/LOSSOOOI CLAYTON PATRICIA L 11426 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA 98055 6!97800!01/L08SOOOI ELMORE GLORIA G 18612 116TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 9117000040/L08SOOOI FOLEY FRANCIS J 11434 SE 186TH RENTON WA 98055 6197800042/L08SOOOI GREYWOLF DEBRA L 11633 SE 184TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2329850030/L08SOOOI HOODTAUNAM 11415 SE 185TH PL RENTON WA 98055 2329850270/L08SOOOI KING COUNTY 500 KC ADMIN BLDG 5004TH AVE SEATTLE WA 98104 2329850020/L08S0001 APOLONIO ARCHIE A+IMELDA R 11409 SE 185TH PL RENTON WA 98055 6!97800162/L08SOOOI BOUDON GLEN D+ JOHANNA 2117THAVES EDMONDS WA 98020 6197800065/L08S0001 BRYAN SCOTT D+BRENDA M 18434 I 16TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 3223059282/LOSSOOOI CHURCHILL BRETT J+JO M 18624 114TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 6197800080/LOSSOOOl DAY OWEN 2025 OAKGROVE DR NW ALBANY OR 97321 3223059149/LOSSOOO! FACILITIES & OPERATIONS CTR OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIR 300 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98055 322305928!/LOSSOOOI FRANKLIN MARY H+SAMUEL L 18619114TH AVE SE RENOTN WA 98055 9117000170/L08SOOO! HARRIS JOAN PO BOX 1023 MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 2329850260/L08SOOOI ISLA RESTITUTO P+ALICIA M 18549 114TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 619780016l/L08S0001 LANCASTER CARTER F 11618SE 188TH RENTON WA 98055 6197800 I 20/L08SOOO I LAY ROSS 100 PII ALii ST HAIKU HI 96708 91 I 7000220/L08SOOOI MCNEILLY CAROL 11403 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA 98055 3223059113/L08SOOOI NGUYEN CHUC T+BUI YVONNE T 18621 116TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 91 17000090/L08SOOO I PHAMCHUNGP 11254 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA 98055 SD 13/L08SOOO I RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT #403 R. STRACKE, FACILITIES & PLANNING 1220 N 4TH ST RENTON WA 98055 6197800164/L08SOOOI RUDO JEREMY H+RONA S FRIMME 527 N 70TH ST SEATTLE WA 98103 9117000080/L08SOOO I STERNOD JACQUELINE A 11404 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA 98055 6197800140/L08SOOOI TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH 18652 116TH SE RENTON WA 98055 9117000020/L08SOOOI ZEMANEK GREGG 11448 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA 98055 Nt/U !::UJ 6 I 97800024/L08SOOO I LUCKIE JEFFREYS+ TERRI L !1631 SE 184TH ST RENTON WA 98058 6197800125/L08SOOOI MITCHELL RICHARD E+ROBERTA PO BOX 20291 SEATTLE WA 98102 2329850040/L08SOOOI NGUYEN DINH D+HUONG T 11421 SE 185THPL RENTON WA 98055 9117000030/L08SOOOI PODAR MARIUS+MONICA 11442 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA 98055 9117000010/LOSSOOO! REYES MARIAM 11456 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA 98055 3223059147/LOSSOOOI RUGA SHEILA+NOVELITO PO BOX 59921 RENTON WA 98058 6197800022/L08SOOOI STUBB JOHNE 18418116THSE RENTON WA 98055 9117000060/LOSSOOO I VALBUSH HOWARD M+BRENDA LC 11420 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA 98005 9117000240/L08SOOOI LUENG JENNIFER 11249 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA 98055 3223059033/LOSSOOO! MJF HOLDINGS INC 215 E MEEKER KENT WA 98032 6!97800183/LOSSOOOI NUGENT MICHAEL D+PAMELA K 11642 SE 188TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2329850010/LOSSOOO! PREPOTENTE JOHN-MICHAEL B+ ALMA 11403 SE 185TH PL RENTON WA 98055 2329850140/LOSSOOOI RODRIGUEZ ZOILA E 18538114TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 3223059280/L08SOOOI SCHLOSSTEIN HUGH R+ JEANNE E 18615 114TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST RENTON WA 98055 2329850060/L08SOOOI TESFAMICHAEL ZERBABIEL Y+EMBAYE 11429 SE 185TH PL RENTON WA 98055 6197800060/L08SOOOI YERMAKOV PAVEL 11659 SE 184TH ST RENTON WA 98058 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: LAND USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: March 19, 2009 LUA09-003, ECF, SHPL-H (King County File L08S0001) Lakeside REI Renton Short Plat PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner approval of a Short Plat for the subdivision of a 1.36-acre site into 7-lots for the eventual development of single-family residences with tracts for access, a Category 4 wetland, and recreation/drainage. The site generally slopes to the north. The project is vested to King County regulations and is being processed in the City of Renton. King County applicable zoning is R-8. The proposed density is 5.15 dwelling units per gross acre. Lots would range in size from 4,002 to 4,683 square feet. The site would be accessed from 116th Avenue SE via the access tract ending in a temporary cul-de-sac easement. King County has previously approved a Road Standards Variance {Road Variance L07V0075} for this project. PROJECT LOCATION: 18621 1161h Avenue SE OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional ONS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated (DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: King County: January 17, 2008 f City of Renton: January 27, 2009 King County: February 14, 2008 I City of Renton: March 19, 2009 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Yvonne Bui, Lakeside Real Estate Investments, LLC; Tel: (206) 666-4123 Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Short Plat approval Building, Utility, and Construction Permits Level I Drainage Study, Wetland Study, and Preliminary Technical Report Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Public hearing is tentatively scheduled for April 28, 2009 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. The subject site is designated Residential -8 (R-8) on King County's Zoning Map. Environmental (SEPA) Checklist; Wetland Determination; Preliminary Technical Information Report; Level 1 Drainage Analysis: Preliminary T echn1cal Information Report The project will be subject to the City of Renton's and King County's SEPA ordinance. King County's Development Regulations and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Transporlation Mitigation Fee: The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Fire Mlfigation Fee; The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee; Compliance with recommendations of the Wetland Determination; and Compliance with the recommendations of the Drainage report Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner, CED - Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on April 2, 2009. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on April 28, 2009, at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers. Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Development Services Division to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled at (425) 430-7282. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal. or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail. please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Gerald C. Wasser, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7382 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton. CED -Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Name/File No.: Lakeside REI Renton Short Plat/LUA09-003, ECF, SHPL-H (King County File L08S0001) NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: f\'.Y CIT~ :lF RENTON + >+-+ Department of Community and G"~•Ro,,, ..a Economic Development ~ -I.!:;. Denis Law, Mayor U:'E:. ~, Alex Pietsch, Administrator gN~o-;--~~;.....;.~~~~~~~~~~~~.:.::;~;;.;.;;:..;.:;;;.:::::::.::.::.::::~- March 19, 2009 Yvonne Bui Lakeside REI, LLC P.O. Box 69563 Seatac, WA 98168 Subject: Lakeside REI Short Plat LUA 09-003, ECF, SHPL-H (KC File No. LOSSOOOI) Dear Ms. Bui: This letter is to notify you that the Planning Division of the City of Renton has received the above subject application from the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) for review and approval. The City of Renton has tentatively scheduled the preliminary plat for consideration by the City's Environmental Review Committee on April 6, 2009. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required. In addition, this matter is tentatively scheduled for a Public Hearing on April 28, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. to review King County's recommendation to the Hearing Examiner. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant are required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you prior to the scheduled hearing. All Public Hearings are held in the Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 430-7382. Sincerely, ~~ Gerald C. Wasser Associate Planner cc: See Attached / Party( ies) of Record ______ 10_5_5 -So_u_th_G_rad_y _W_ay--~R-e-nt-on-.-W-as_h_in_gt_on-98-0-57 ______ ~ @ Thi$ paper contains 50%° recycled m~lerial, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE Yvonne Bui Lakeside Real Estate Investments, LLC PO Box 69563 Seatac, WA 98168 tel: (206) 666-4123 (owner/ applicant) Bret Churchill 18624 114th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98055 (party of record) Trishah Bull, PPMIII CPLN LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) Kris Langley, Traffic Engr PARTIES OF RECORD LAKESIDE REI SHORT PLAT LUA09-003, ECF, SHPL-H Rich Hudson Rand D Enterprises 21936 234th Avenue SE Maple Valley, WA 98038 tel: ( 425) 432-4806 eml: rd-enterprises@comcast.net (contact) Roger Pfluger & Kelly Jaco 18605 116th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98058 (party of record) Molly Johnson, Develop Engr ERS LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 , (party of record) Arlene Mariano, PPM! Owen B. Hille Cramer Northwest, Inc. 945 N Central Avenue ste: #104 Kent, WA 98032 tel: (253) 852-4955 ( contact) Steve Bottheim, Supervisor CPLN LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) Curt Foster, Engr III ERS LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 , (party of record) Judi Moe, ASII RD SERV DIV MS KSC TR 0231 CPLN LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 CPLN LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) Brian Norton, Engr II ERS LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 ' (party of record) Kelly Whiting, KC DOT RD SERV DIV MS KSC TR 0231 , (party of record) Updated: 03/19/09 ' (party of record) Carol Rogers FGMU ODES , (party of record) ' (party of record) Steve Townsend, Supervisor LUIS LUSD MS OAK DE 0100 , (party of record) (Page 1 of 1) ~ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov January 15, 2009 Jennifer Henning Planning Division City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE: Preliminary Approval for Short Subdivision No.L08SOOO 1 Lakeside REI Renton Short Plat Dear Ms. Henning: The King County Land Use Services Division (LUSD) has completed its review of the above-noted short subdivision application. LUSD staff have determined the proposed short plat can comply with the King County Land Segregation Code (Title 19A), the Zoning Code (Title 21A), and other applicable codes referenced in KCC 19A.08 060. Pursuant to the provisions of the interlocal agreement between the City and our department for the review of pending applications in the Benson Heights annexation area, LUSD recommends this short subdivision be granted preliminary approval subject to conditions. Enclosed you will find the following relevant documents: • Draft Notice of Decision * • Report and Decision * • Labels for Parties of Record and 500 foot radius list • Customer Information Bulletin #25 (You may wish to forward this document to the applicant with the decision to grant preliminary approval to the application.) If you have any questions or need additional documents from the file, please contact either Arlene Mariano, Project Manager, at 206-296-6686 or by e-mail at arlene.mariano@kingcounty.gov or Brian Norton, Engineer, at 206-296-7118 or by e-mail at brian.norton@kingcounty.gov. Following the completion of your review, please forward a copy of the City's decision to Arlene Mariano. The preliminary approval will be valid for the period of60-months from the date of the decision. In addition, following the close of the appeal period, please send confirmation as to whether any appeals of the City's decision were filed, and a copy of any subsequent appeal decision issued by the City. Sincerely, ~ ~~im, Supervisor Current Planning Section Land Use Services enclosures * An electronic copy of these documents will also be forwarded to the City. ,-. King County Department of Development & Environmental Services State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) L08S0001 Lakeside REI Renton Short Plat Date of Issuance: Project: Location: Applicant: King County Contact: Telephone No.: E-mail: King County Permits: January 15, 2009 This is a short subdivision of 1.36 acres (59,241 square feet) into 7 lots for detached single family dwellings and tracts for drainage, recreation and critical areas in the R-8 zone. The proposed lot sizes range from approximately 4,000 to 4,700 square feet. 18621 11~th Avenue SE, located approximately ~00 feet north of SE 188 h Strertt and 120 feet south of SE 1861 Street on the west side of 116 h Avenue SE, Postal City, Renton, WA. Lakeside Real Estate Investments, LLC PO Box 69563 Seatac, WA 98168 206-666-4123 Arlene Mariano, Project/Program Manager I 206-296-6686 arlene.mariano@kingcounty.gov Short Subdivision Zoning: R-8 Community Plan: Soos Creek Drainage Subbasin: Black River Section/Township/Range: SE 32-23-05 Notes: A. This finding is based on review of the project site plan received November 12, 2008 (revised), environmental checklist received July 15, 2008, a level one drainage analysis received July 15, 2008 (revised), a wetland report dated March 12, 2008, a wetland mitigation plan revised November 5, 2008, Road Variance L07V0075 approved September 24, 2007 and other documents in the file. B. Issuance of this threshold determination does not constitute approval of the permit. This proposal will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable King County codes, which regulate development activities, including the Uniform Fire and Building Codes, Road Standards, Surface Water Design Manual, and Critical Areas Regulations. Threshold Determination The responsible official finds that the above described proposal does not pose a probable significant adverse impact to the environment. .. • L08S0001 Lakeside REI Rent hart Plat Page 2 This finding is made pursuant to RCW 43.21C, KCC 20.44 and WAC 197-11 after reviewing the environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency and considering mitigation measures which the agency or the applicant will implement as part of the proposal. The responsible official finds this information reasonably sufficient to evaluate the environmental impact of this proposal. The lead agency has determined that the requirements for environmental analysis, protection, and mitigation measures have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or federal laws or rules, as provided by RCW 43.21C.240 and WAC 197-11-158. Our agency will not require any additional mitigation measures under SEPA. Comments and Appeals The SEPA determination may be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner. Written comments or a notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) at the address listed below prior to 5:00 p.m. on February 2, 2009, and be accompanied with a filing fee of $250.00 payable to the King County Office of Finance. Please reference the file numbers when corresponding. If a SEPA Appeal is filed, the appellant must also file a Statement of Appeal with DOES at the address listed below prior to 5:00 p.m. on February 9, 2009. The Statement of Appeal shall identify the decision appealed (including the file number) and the alleged errors in that SEPA decision. The Statement of Appeal shall state: 1) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the Statement of Appeal. Failure to timely file a Notice of Appeal, appeal fee or Statement of Appeal, deprives the Hearing Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. CommenUappeal deadline: Appeal filing fee: Address for commenUappeal: Responsible Official: 5:00 PM on February 2, 2009 $250 check or money order made out to the King County Office of Finance King County Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98057-5212 ATIN: Current Planning Section Steve Bottheim, Current Planning Supervisor Current Planning Section Date Signed Land Use Services Division Date Mailed: January 15, 2009 tQ ,~otice of King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 Land Use Decision AND Environmental Threshold Determination (Type 2) File No.: L08S0001 File Name: Lakeside REI Renton Short Plat Applicant: Lakeside Real Estate Investments, LLC PO Box 69563 Seatac, WA 98168 206-666-4123 Department Decision: Approve with conditions SEPA Threshold Determination: Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) Date of Decision and SEPA Determination: January 15, 2009 Project Location: 186211161h Avenue SE, located approximately 500 feet north of SE 1881h Street and 120 feet south of SE 1861h Street on the west side of 1161h Avenue SE, Postal City, Renton, WA. Project Description: This is a short subdivision of 1.36 acres (59,241 square feet) into 7 lots for detached single family dwellings and tracts for drainage, recreation and critical areas in the R-8 zone. The proposed lot sizes range from approximately 4,000 to 4,700 square feet. Permits Requested: Short Subdivision King County Contact: Telephone No.: E-mail: Arlene Mariano, Project/Program Manager I 206-296-6686 arlene.mariano@kingcounty.gov Appeal Deadline: February 2, 2009 Comment and Appeal Procedure: Comments on this proposal are welcome. You also have the right to appeal this decision and/or determination in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner. In order to appeal, a party must file: 1. A notice of appeal and a $250.00 non-refundable filing fee (payable to the King County Office of Finance) by 5:00 p.m., February 2, 2009, and 2. A statement of appeal, by 5:00 p.m., February 9, 2009, which includes: A. The decision and/or determination being appealed; B. The errors contained in that decision and/or determination; C. Specific reasons why the decision and/or determination should be reversed or modified. D. The harm suffered or anticipated by the party; and E. The relief sought. Appeals must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) at the following address: ODES -Land Use Services Division Attn: Permit Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the Statement of Appeal. Failure to timely file a Notice of Appeal, appeal fee or Statement of Appeal, deprives the Hearing Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. The Hearing Examiner does not have the authority to extend the time period unless the Division is not open on the specified date, in which event delivery prior to 4:30 p.m. on the next business day is sufficient to meet the filing requirement. Date of Mailing: January 15, 2009 If you have any questions regarding the appeal procedures, please contact the Project Manager at the phone number listed above. If you require this material in Braille, audio cassette or large print, call 206-296-6600 (phone) or 206-296-7217 (TTY). King County has made a decision on an application for a development proposal on property at the address listed above. You are receiving notice of this decision because our records indicate that you own property within approximately 500 feet or because you requested to receive notice of the decision. ~ King County DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 REPORT AND DECISION Recommendation to the City of Renton SHORT SUBDIVISION File No. L08S0001 January 15, 2009 A. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED SHORT SUBDIVISION: This is a short subdivision of 1.36 acres (59,241 square feet) into 7 lots for detached single family dwellings and tracts for drainage, recreation and critical areas in the R-8 zone. The proposed density is approximately 5.15 dwelling units per acre. The proposed lot sizes range from approximately 4,000 to 4,700 square feet. A revised site plan was received on November 12, 2008. The primary modifications include lot and tract reconfiguration and additional general notes. Refer to Attachment 1 for a copy of the short plat map. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: C. Owner/Applicant: Lakeside Real Estate Investments, LLC PO Box 69563 Seatac, WA 98168 206-666-4123 Engineer: Cramer Northwest Inc 945 N Central, Suite 104 Kent, WA 98032 253-852-4955 STR: SE 32-23-05 Location: 18621 116 1h Avenue SE, located approximately 500 feet north of SE 188 1h Street and 120 feet south of SE 186tn Street on the west side of 116 1h Avenue SE, Postal City, Renton, WA. Zoning: R-8 Acreage: 1.36 acres Number of Lots: 7 Density: Approximately 5.15 dwelling units per acre Lot Size: Between Approximately 4,000 to 4,700 square feet Proposed Use: Single Family Detached Dwellings Sewage Disposal: Soos Creek Water and Sewer District Water Supply: Soos Creek Water and Sewer District Fire District: King County Fire Protection District 40 School District: Renton School District 403 Complete Application Date: February 14, 2008 Associated Application: Road Variance File No. L07V0075 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT: 1 . Topography: The topography of the site is rolling with the steepest slope at approximately 6-10%. 2. Soils: AgB soils are found on this site per King County Soil Survey, 1973. Report & Decision Page 1 of 12 L08S000I AqB -Alderwood gravely, sandy loam; 0-6% slopes. Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight. This soil type has a moderate limitation for low building foundations due to a seasonally high water table, and severe limitations for septic tank filter fields due to very slow permeability in the substratum. 3. Wetlands: A wetland report dated March 12, 3008 and a wetland mitigation plan revised November 5, 2008 were prepared by JS Jones and Associates, Inc. This property contains a Category IV wetland in the northwest corner of the site. The standard buffer for a Category IV wetland in an urban area is 50 feet measured from the wetland boundary. A ODES Environmental Scientist has reviewed the report and concurred with its findings, see condition 10. The site lies within the Black River Drainage Basin. 4. Vegetation: This site is primarily covered in lawn and landscape. Blackberry brush, cottonwood and cedar are found around the perimeter of the site. 5. Wildlife: Small birds and animals undoubtedly inhabit this site; however, their population and species are limited due to nearby development. Larger species may visit this site on occasion. D. DESIGN FEATURES: 1. Density, Lot Pattern, Comprehensive & Community Plan/SDO: This property is located in unincorporated urban King County in the Soos Creek Community Planning Area. The zoning of the subject property is R-8. The proposed subdivision meets the base density, minimum density, minimum lot width, and minimum lot area requirements of the R-8 zone. An existing residence and shop currently exist on the site. These structures will be removed with the development of this short plat. 2. Access/Roadway Section: The property fronts 115th Avenue SE, an urban collector arterial. Currently, the roadway travel surface is 20 feet in width and the road has a paved 8 foot shoulder along the property frontage. This frontage will be improved to the urban standard (curb and sidewalk) and additional right-of- way will be dedicated. An urban subacess street is proposed for access to the property off 1161h Avenue SE. Road Variance L07V0075 was approved for reduced intersection spacing. 3. Drainage: The existing site drainage mainly sheet flows from the southeast to the northwest. No significant amounts of upstream flow enter the site. A small wetland is located at the northwest corner of the property. Existing stormwater has and will continue to flow through this wetland in the developed condition. Stormwater sheet flows from the wetland across properties that occupy the space between the site and SE 1861h Street to the north. Stormwater then enters the SE 1861h Street storm system, then flows southwesterly, south, and westerly to a King Count~ Stormwater Facility located at the intersection of 11ih Avenue SE and SE 184 Place. 4. Other Design Features: Road Variance L07V0075 was approved September 24, 2007 for reduced intersection spacing. 5. Utilities: a. Sewage Disposal: The applicant proposes to serve the subject subdivision by means of a public sewer system managed by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. A Certificate of Sewer Availability was issued by the district on December 20, 2007. b. Water Supply: The applicant proposes to serve the subject subdivision with a public water supply and distribution system managed by Soos Report and Decision Page 2 of 12 LOSSOOOl Creek Water and Sewer District. A Certificate of Water Availability was issued by the district on December 20, 2007. 6. School Facilities: The subject subdivision will be served by Benson Hill Elementary, Nelsen Middle and Lindbergh Senior High Schools, all located within the Renton School District 403. School Access: The District has indicated that the future students from this subdivision will walk to Benson Hill Elementary and be bussed to Nelsen Middle and Lindbergh High Schools. Benson Hill Elementary is located directly south of this proposed development. Walkway conditions to the elementary school consist of a series of paved and gravel shoulders and sidewalks. The bus stop location for Nelsen Middle School is located at 1161 h Avenue SE and SE 1861 h Street. The bus stop location for Lindbergh High School is located at 1161 h Avenue SE and SE 1881h Street. Walkway conditions to the middle and high school bus stops consist of a series of paved and gravel shoulders and sidewalks. School Impact Fees: Lots within this subdivision are subject to King County Code 21A.43, which imposes impact fees to fund school system improvements needed to serve the new development. The current fee payment per lot is $0 per lot (per 2009 School Impact Fees). The assessed fee shall be collected prior to building permit issuance using the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit application. 7. Parks and Recreation Space: The nearest public park is Boulevard Lane Park located approximately 2,700 feet east of the subject property. King County Code 21A.14 requires subdivisions of more than 4 lots in the UR and R zone classifications to either provide on-site recreation space or pay a fee to the Parks Division for establishment and maintenance of neighborhood parks. This subdivision is for 7 lots in the urban zone and will therefore be providing on-site recreation space. E. SEPA THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21 C, the responsible official of the Land Use Services Division (LUSD) issued a threshold determination of non-significance (DNS) for the proposed development on January 15, 2009. This determination was based on the review of the environmental checklist and supporting documentation filed with the application, resulting in the conclusion that the proposal would not cause probable significant adverse impacts on the environment. F. FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS: The subject subdivision will comply with the goals and objectives of the King County Comprehensive Plan and will comply with the requirements of the Subdivision and Zoning Codes and other official land use controls of King County (i.e. 2007 King County Road Design and Construction Standards, 2005 Surface Water Design Manual, etc.), based upon the conditions for final short plat approval. G. DECISION: Proposed Short Plat L08S0001, revised and received November 12, 2008 as described by Attachment 1 of this report is GRANTED PRELIMINARY APPROVAL; subject to the following conditions of final approval: 1. KCC Title 19A -Compliance with Final Short Subdivision Requirements a. This short plat shall comply with all of the Land Segregation provisions of King County Code (KCC) Title 19A. Report and Decision Page 3 of 12 L08S0001 b. C. d. e. f. The final short subdivision recording documents must be prepared by a professional land surveyor, licensed in the State of Washington. These documents shall comply with the conditions of approval listed in this letter. The final review process must be completed prior to the recording of the short subdivision or the sale of any lots contained within. The Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) strongly recommends that the Final Short Plat review package be submitted to the department at least one year prior to the expiration date of the preliminary approval letter. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final short subdivision. All utilities within proposed rights-of-way must be included within a franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final short plat recording. Prior to recording KCC 19A.08.160 requires that the following site work is completed: 1. Drainage facilities and erosion control measures are consistent with K.C.C. 9.04.090; 2. Water mains and hydrants (if required) are installed and fire flow available; 3. Grading as necessary so that all lots are accessible by passenger vehicle; 4. Specific site improvements are completed that are required and conditioned prior to plat recording or required to remove any safety hazard; 5. Undeveloped critical areas are delineated. 2. Surface Water Management and Control (KCC 9) 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) Final short plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code (KCC) 9.04. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval, which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the SWDM must also be satisfied during engineering and final review unless otherwise approved by ODES. a. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 2005 SWDM. DOES approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. b. Standard plan notes and a construction sequence as specified in the SWDM shall be shown on the engineering plans (Reference Section 78). c. As required in Chapter 2 of the drainage manual, a storm water pollution prevention and spill (SWPPS) plan shall be included with the project engineering plans. d. To implement the required Best Management Practices (BMP) for treatment of storm water, the final engineering plans and technical information report (TlR) shall clearly demonstrate compliance with all applicable design standards. As described in Chapter 5 of the drainage manual, a subdivision project may implement the required BMPs or defer Report and Decision Page 4 of 12 L08S0001 the BMP requirements until future review of building permits. In either case, the final engineering plans shall clearly indicate the applicable BMP standards and requirements for implementation on the recorded plat. Any proposed clearing and grading of the site shall also comply with the soil amendment requirements in KCC 16.82.100. e. A proposal to implement the required BMPs for development of the subdivision and to receive credit in sizing the flow control facility should be included with the engineering submittal. The engineering plans and technical information report shall provide all required design standards and procedures for implementing the BMPs when applied. During engineering review, the applicant may also choose alternative designs for best management practices as allowed by the SWDM. The final recorded plat shall include covenants, easements, notes, and other details to implement the BM P's for site development when applied f. Storm water facilities shall be designed using the KCRTS Conservation flow control standard. Water quality facilities shall also be provided using the Basic Water Quality protection menu. All runoff control facilities shall be located in a separate tract and/or right-of-way dedicated to King County or if portions of the drainage tract are used for recreation space in accordance with KCC 21A.14. 180 and/or right-of way is privately maintained, a public drainage easement shall be provided. If required, the size of the proposed drainage tracts may have to increase to accommodate the required detention storage volumes and water quality facilities g. If the storm water BM P's are deferred until building permit review, the following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: "Permit applications for buildings or other improvements constructed on lots created by this subdivision must be reviewed by King County for compliance with Best Management Practices (BM P's) and other applicable drainage standards as specified in the SWDM. As determined by King County, the permit applicant for each lot must prepare a drainage site plan with procedures for design and maintenance details, and record a declaration of covenant and grant of easement for implementation of the BMPs." Consistent with authority and procedures outlined in Chapter 1.4 of the SWDM, drainage adjustments to any of the above requirements may be considered. Adjustments shall be submitted to DOES on the appropriate form and with the minimum fee deposit. 4. Access Requirements (KCC 14) 2007 King County Road Design and Construction Standards (KCRDCS) Roadway improvements are required to address access requirements and impacts to existing roads and right-of-way. The extent of improvements (conditioned below) requires submittal of engineering plan and profiles and appropriate review fees. Plans shall be prepared and stamped by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Washington and contain the applicable elements outlined in KCRDCS and/or the 2005 Surface Water Design Manual (see Section 2.2.2). Please note that the applicant should submit the plans a minimum of one year prior to the preliminary approval expiration date. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the 2007 KCRDCS established and adopted by Ordinance No. 15753, as amended. The proposed short subdivision shall comply with the KCRDCS including the following requirements, unless otherwise approved by DOES: Report and Decision Page 5 of 12 · L08S0001 a. The on-site road shall be constructed to urban subaccess standards with curb, gutter and sidewalk extending to the west property line. Rolled curb shall be used throughout the temporary cul-de-sac (KCRDCS 2.03 B and 2.08). b. A road variance application (L07V0075) regarding reduced intersection spacing was approved by King County on September 24, 2007. The final engineering plans for the short plat shall comply with all conditions of approval for the road variance decision. c. A temporary cul-de-sac shall be provided at the terminus of the proposed urban subaccess street consistent with KCRDCS 2.08. d. 1161h Avenue SE is classified as an urban collector arterial street (KCRDCS 2.03). Urban frontage improvements (including curb gutter and sidewalk shall be constructed along the frontage of this road consistent with a 3-lane ultimate road design with bike lane. Lane striping shall be consistent with King County Department of Transportation requirements. e. A full street overlay is required (due to pavement widening) unless a variance is approved by the county road engineer (KCRDCS 4.03). f. There shall be no vehicular access to and from 1161 h Avenue SE from the lots which abut it. Access to all lots shall be by means of an on-site urban subaccess street (KCRDCS 2.03). This restriction shall be shown on the face of the engineering plans and the final recorded short subdivision. g. Non-yielding and non-breakaway obstacles (including trees) shall be removed to provide a clear zone of 5.5-feet measured from the edge of vertical curb (KCRDCS 5.10). h. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated along 1161h Avenue SE frontage to provide 42 feet from centerline of road per KCRDCS 2.03 and a 25 foot property line radius shall be provided at any street intersection. i. The intersection of site access shall be designed consistent with Section 2.10 KCRDCS. j. Street illumination shall be provided at intersections with arterials in accordance with KCRDCS 5.05. Modifications to the above road improvement conditions may be considered by King County pursuant to the variance procedures in KCRDCS 1.12. Any request for a road variance shall be submitted to DOES on the appropriate form and with the minimum fee deposit. Other engineering details that may be shown on the preliminary site plan with the exception of the above may not have been reviewed for compliance with KCRDCS. If differences exist, the final design shall be modified to meet KCRDCS. In addition to the above conditions, right-of-way construction permit is required for any utility work in County right-of-way. 5. Site Improvement Inspections, Fees and Financial Guarantees (KCC 19 & 27) This short plat was conditioned to construct/reconstruct road access/right-of-way improvements and/or drainage facilities. Approved engineering plans, inspection fee and applicable financial guarantees are required prior to either starting construction or recording this short plat. At the time of engineering plan approval, you will be notified of the fee amount that will be required to inspect construction and the amount shall be deposited with DOES and of the financial guarantee amount(s) required prior to scheduling of the pre-construction meeting. Please note that the pre-construction meeting is mandatory prior to the start of any work (including site clearing) or the recording of the short plat. Report and Decision Page 6 of 12 L08S0001 6. Health {KCC 13) This project is exempt from further King County Heath Department review. However, if improvements are required by the sewer and/or water purveyor to serve the lots in this short plat, then written documentation shall be provided from said purveyor(s) to verify that the required improvements have been bonded and/or installed, and all necessary easements have been provided, prior to final recording of the short plat. 7. Building and Construction Standards {Title 16) The applicant shall comply with all applicable provisions of KCC Chapter 16.82, including KCC 16.82.156 concerning the preservation of "significant trees" on short subdivisions located in the King County "Urban" designated area. A detailed tree retention plan, which complies with KCC 16.82.15682 and other applicable requirements of this Code section, shall be submitted to DOES for review and approval prior to engineering plan approval (if required), or prior to final short plat approval where engineering plans are not required. Bonding may be required by ODES to assure implementation of the tree retention plan. No clearing or grading of the site shall occur until DOES approves the detailed tree retention plan (and engineering plans where required). 8. Fire Code {KCC 17) Section 902 of the 1997 Edition of Uniform Fire Code The applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main and fire flow standards of Chapter 17.08 of the King County Code. Preliminary Fire Engineering approval has been granted with the following condition: **** SPRINKLERS REQUIRED**** Any future residences constructed on the lots within this short plat shall be sprinkled (NFPA 13D) unless the requirement is removed by the King County Fire Marshal or his/her designee. Title 17 of the King County Code requires residences on lots that are zoned Urban and less than 35,000 sq. ft. in area to have a fire hydrant that flows at least 1,000 gpm located within 350 feet vehicular travel distance of each building envelope. The certificate of water availability submitted with this short plat application does not indicate where the nearest fire hydrant is and does not provide available fire flow information. Additionally, any future residence constructed on lots 4, 5, 6 and 7 must be sprinkled due to inadequate fire apparatus access. Section 503 of the International Fire Code (IFC) requires all portions of the exterior walls of buildings (at grade) to be within 150 feet (as a person would walk via an approved route around the structure) from approved fire apparatus access. Approved access is a minimum 20-foot wide unobstructed driving surface that is not over 150 feet in length if dead-end. To remove the sprinkler requirement it will be necessary to provide a valid certificate of water availability indicating that the require fire flow is available at a fire hydrant located within 350 feet of all building envelopes. Additionally, the curb-to-curb driving surface width of the private access tract {on-site roadway) will have to be 36 feet if parking is allowed on both sides of the road and no less that 28 feet if parking is permitted on only one side. 9. Zoning Code {KCC 21A) a. Density and Dimensions (KCC 21A.12) Report and Decision All lots shall meet the density and dimensions requirements of the R-8 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved Page 7 of 12 L08S0001 preliminary short subdivision, whichever is larger. Minor revisions to the short subdivision, which do not result in substantial changes and/or do not create additional lots may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services. b. Street trees shall be provided as follows (per KCRDCS 5.03 and KCC 21A.16.050): 1. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all public roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. 2. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Section 5.03 and Drawings 5-009 through 5-013 of the 2007 King County Road Design and Construction Standards (KCRDCS), unless the King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of- way. 3. If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. 4. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the County has adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. 5. The species of trees shall be approved by DOES if located within the right-of-way, and shall comply with KCRDCS 5.03L, M, and N. They shall not include species the County determines has the potential to disrupt utilities or impact roadway improvements. All tree planting in the right-of-way shall include the installation of an approved root barrier adjacent to walks and curbs for each tree, unless otherwise approved by the County Road Engineer. Report and Decision 6. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity worksheet for review and approval by DOES prior to engineering plan approval (if required), or if engineering plans are not required, at the time of the required pre-construction meeting (see condition 4 above). 7. The applicant shall contact Metro Service Planning at 206-684- 1622 to determine if 116th Avenue SE is on a bus route. If 1161 h Avenue SE is a bus route, the street tree plan shall also be reviewed by Metro. 8. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DOES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. Page 8 of 12 L08S000I 10. Critical Areas (KCC 21A.24) The proposed short subdivision shall comply with the Critical Areas Code as outlined in KCC 21A.24. Impacts to critical areas shall be avoided where possible, and compensatory mitigation is required for approved adverse impacts. Preliminary short plat review has identified the following specific requirements that apply to this project. All other applicable requirements from KCC 21A.24 shall also be addressed by the applicant. Wetlands a. Category and Buffers (KCC 21A.24.318 and 325): This property contains a Category IV wetland in the northwest corner of the site. The standard buffer for a Category IV wetland in an urban area is 50 feet measured from the wetland boundary. b. Critical Areas Tract (KCC 21A.24.180): The wetland and buffer on this property shall be placed in a Critical Areas Tract to be shown on the engineering plans and final short plat. The Critical Areas Tract shall be held in an undivided interest by each owner of a building lot within the development, with this ownership interest passing with the ownership of the lot, or shall be held by an incorporated homeowner's association or other legal entity that ensures the ownership, maintenance and protection of the tract. c. A minimum building setback line of 15 feet shall be required from the edge of the buffer (KCC 21 A.24.200). d. Permanent survey marking, and signs shall be installed prior to final short plat approval (KCC 21A.24.160. e. Temporary marking of critical areas and their buffers (for example, bright orange construction fencing) shall be placed on the site and shall remain in place until all construction activities are completed. f. The following note shall be shown on the final engineering plan and recorded plat: Report and Decision RESTRICTIONS FOR CRITICAL AREA TRACTS AND CRITICAL AREAS AND BUFFERS Dedication of a critical area tract/critical area and buffer conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the tract/critical area and buffer. This interest includes the preservation of native vegetation for all purposes that benefit the public health, safety and welfare, including control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The critical area tract/critical area and buffer imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the land subject to the tract/critical area and buffer the obligation, enforceable on behalf of the public by King County, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the tract/critical area and buffer. The vegetation within the tract/critical area and buffer may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged without approval in writing from the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services or its successor agency, unless otherwise provided by law. The common boundary between the tract/critical area and buffer and the area of development activity must be marked or otherwise flagged to the satisfaction of King County prior to any clearing, grading, building construction or other development activity on a lot subject to the critical area tract/critical area and buffer. The required marking or flagging shall remain in place until all development proposal activities in the vicinity of the critical area are completed. Page 9 of 12 L08S0001 No building foundations are allowed beyond the required 15-foot building setback line, unless otherwise provided by law. g. No adverse impact to wetland hydrology shall result from this proposal. Engineering plans and calculations shall demonstrate that the pre-existing wetland hydrology will be maintained following construction of the development, as shown on the conceptual drainage plan. h. Buffer Reduction (21A.24.325.A.3): Buffer reduction is proposed in accordance with 21A.24.325.A.3.b. The buffer can be reduced by 25 feet in an urban area where as many of the options in Table b cited above are implemented as possible. i. Compensatory Mitigation: A final wetland mitigation plan shall be provided for DOES review and approval prior to engineering approval, substantially in conformance with the Bui Property Mitigation Plan prepared by JS Jones and Associates, Inc., as revised November 5, 2008. The mitigation will be monitored for a total ofthree years. A financial guarantee will be required to ensure successful implementation of the approved mitigation plan. 11. Road Mitigation Payment System (KCC 14.75) The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with Road Mitigation Payment System (MPS), King County Code 14.75, by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by King County Department of Transportation. The applicant has an option to either: a. Pay the MPS fee at final short plat recording, or b. Pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of short plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the short plat that reads, "All fees required by King County code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS) have been paid." If the second option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of the building permit application. 12. School Impact Fees (KCC 21A.43) Lots within this subdivision are subject to King County Code 21A.43, which imposes impact fees to fund school system improvements needed to serve new development. As a condition of final approval, the total amount of the school impact fees shall be assessed and collected when the building permit is issued using the impact fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit submittal. Notes to this effect shall be shown on the final plat. Other Considerations A. Preliminary approval of this application does not limit the applicant's responsibility to obtain any required permit or license from the State or other regulatory body. This may include, but not be limited to, obtaining a forest practice permit, an HPA permit, building permits, and other types of entitlements as necessitated by circumstances. 8. Development of the subject property may require registration with the Washington State Department of Licensing, Real Estate Division. Report and Decision Page 10 of 12 L08SOOOI Appeal Information and Parties of Record Parties and Persons of Interest: Bret Churchill, 18624 114th Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98055 Cramer Northwest Inc/Owen B Hille, 945 N Central Avenue Suite 104, Kent, WA 98032 Rich Hudson/R&D Enterprises, 21936 234th Avenue SE, Maple Valley, WA 98038 Lakeside Real Estate Investment, PO Box 69563, Seatac WA 98168 Roger Pfluger & Kelty Jaco, 18605 116th Avenue SE, Renton WA 98058 Steve Bottheim, Supervisor, Current Planning Section, LUSD, DOES Trishah Bull, ProjecUProgram Manager Ill, Current Planning Section, LUSD, DOES Molly Johnson, Development Engineer, Engineering Review Section, LUSD, DOES Curt Foster, Engineer Ill, Engineering Review Section, LUSD, DOES Kris Langley, Traffic Engineer, Road Services Division, KCDOT Arlene Mariano, ProjecUProgram Manager I, Current Planning Section, LUSD, DOES Judi Moe, ASII, Current Planning Section, LUSD, DDES Brian Norton, Engineer II, Engineering Review Section, LUSD Carol Rogers, FGMU, DOES Steve Townsend, Supervisor, Land Use Inspection Section, LUSD, DOES Kelly Whiting, Road Services Division, KCDOT Report and Decision Page 11 of 12 L08SOOOI RIGHT TO APPEAL This action may be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner, with a fee of $250 (check payable to King County Office of Finance). As required by KCC 20.20.090 and 20.24.090, the appeal period shall be fourteen (14) calendar days and shall commence on the third day after the notice of decision is mailed. Filing an appeal requires actual delivery to the King County Land Use Services Division prior to the close of business (5:00 p.m.) on February 2, 2009. Prior mailing is not sufficient if actual receipt by the Division does not occur within the applicable time period. The Examiner does not have authority to extend the time period unless the Division is not open on the specified closing date, in which event delivery prior to the close of business on the next business day is sufficient to meet the filing requirement. . If a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall file a statement of appeal by 5:00 p.m., on February 9, 2009. The statement of appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including file number) and the alleged errors in that decision. The statement of appeal shall state: 1) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the statement of appeal. Failure to timely file a notice of appeal, appeal fee, or statement of appeal deprives the Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Appeals must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services, addressed as follows: LAND USE APPEAL Land Use Services Division Department of Development and Environmental Services BlackRiver Corporate Park 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Any party may make a request for a pre-hearing conference. For more information regarding appeal proceedings and pre-hearing conferences, please contact the Office of the Examiner for a Citizens' Guide to the Examiner Hearings and/or read KCC 20.20 and 20.24. Report and Decision Page 12 of 12 L08S0001 '• :a r1 ~ ~ m C') ffi < :,;; z: (0 0 0 ~ 0 C) -"TI -I < en ~ _.. m ~ -r 0 N -0 m ....., ~ = (/) = c:x, z m -lpj -···--.. ··---·---•'>!or>·.· ilili!iliiiii2i:li2i2i!ii f ' . ' -. i H_flf UUiiiii I .... , ... Section I: Buildings Type (Residential) or Principal Activity Commercial) Other ...................... .. Vacant ......................... . Section II: Pavement ......................... . I Pavement Version 1. 7 12126107 Square Feet (in thousands of square feet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.00 Total Project Emissions: Emissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Feet MTC02e Embodied Ena 98 33 54 41 475 39 646 0 39 1.541 0 39 1,994 0 39 1,938 0 39 737 0 39 777 0 39 577 0 39 723 0 39 733 0 39 899 374 0 39 339 129 0 39 599 266 0 39 352 181 0 39 1,278 257 0 39 162 47 0 eool 117331 GOPY ~~(G~~\·W~[D) . JUL 15 2008 / ___ ~:C DD E.S. j __ J , w King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 Purpose of the checklist Web date: 10/1212007 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) CHECKLIST For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW Chapter 43.21 C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for the applicants This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations such as zoning, shoreline and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. A. Background 1. Name of the proposed project, if applicable: Lakeside Fairwood Short Plat -DDES File# LOBS0001 COPY '--~~K___:.C:..:.·_:D.D.E.S. 2. Name of applicant: Lakeside REI, Michael Nguyen LakesideSEPAChecklistFORM lc-ckl-SEPA.pdf 10/1212007 Page 1 of 19 3. Address and phone 1ber of applicant and contact person. Applicant's address: 3578 S 1981 h Street, SeaTac, WA 98188; phone# (206) 229-3669 Contact Person/Rich Hudson, Rand D Enterprises, address: 21936 2341h Avenue SE, Maple Valley, WA 98038; phone# (425) 432-4806 4. Date checklist prepared: _J::..:u"'l '--1~0~, =20::..:0c.c8 ___________________ _ 5. Agency requesting checklist _K:..:i"'n,,_g--=C:.::o.ccunc.ct"-y--=D:.::D:.::E:..:S::c/L:::.:U::..:S:::.:D=---------------- 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): No project phasing is anticipated at this time. Once preliminary approval is granted for the short plat, site development (roads and utilities) will commence as soon as engineering and civil plans are approved by DDES/LUSD. Construction of roads and utilities will hopefully begin in early 2009 and house construction as soon as the short plat receives final approval/recording. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? 0 Yes ~ No If yes, explain. N/A 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Level 1 Drainage Analysis Conceptual Drainage Plan Wetland Site Evaluation Wetland Report & Mitigation Plan for buffer reduction LakesideSEPAChecklistFORM lc-ckl-SEPA.pdf 10/12/2007 Page 2 of 19 9. Do you know wheth iplications are pending for governme pprovals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? D Yes ~ No If yes, explain. N/A 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Short plat approval -preliminary and final Engineering plan approval for road and drainage facilities 11. Give brief complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The site is 1.34 acres in size and seven detached single-family residential lots are being proposed. The lot sizes range from 4002 to 4683 square feet and a combined drainage & recreation tract is also part of the site plan. This drainage and recreation tract is 11,691 square feet in size and it is located adjacent to a type 4 wetland located in the extreme northwest corner of the site in accordance with appropriate wetland buffers. One access from 116"' Avenue SE will serve the proposal and it's location will align with a previously approved short plat access on the east side of 116'" Avenue SE. An existing house and detached garage will be demolished prior finalizing the short plat. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site or sites. Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications to this checklist. The site address is 18621 -116"' Avenue SE, Renton, WA, 98058 and the subject propery lies on the west side of 116"' Avenue SE approximately 120feet south of S.E. 186'" Street. The site is also immediately north of and adjacent to Benson Hill Elementary School. LakesideSEPAChecklistFORM lc-ckl-SEPA.pdf 10/12/2007 Page 3 of 19 To be completed by applicant B. Environmental elements 1. Earth a. General description of the site ( check one) D Flat l:i<;I Rolling D Hilly D Steep slopes D Mountainous D Other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent of slope)? approximately 6-10% c. What general types of soil are found on the site (i.e., clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. The site basically consists of a large central grassy area with trees and brush concentrated around the perimeter. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? D Yes !ZI No If so, describe. NA e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Road subbase material will be brought in to raise the central portion of the access road and similar lot fill material for the short plat lots that are affected by the raised road area will be brought in -see attached short plat site plan map, Level 1 drainage analysis and road profile. The maximum amount of fill is 4-6 feet and all material will be apporved road subgrade material/rock for the road and appropriate material for lots. Q u ,4,'\/T ,77~ A-.-e ~ 14 "f /<14 iJ e<.,?.,f A--r--T"r / 5 7/' /4--?' E, LakesideSEPAChecklistFORM lc-ckl-SEPA.pdf 10/12/2007 Evaluatiion for Agency Use Only Page4of19 To be completed by applicant f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? D Yes [8J No If so, generally describe. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (i.e., asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 55% of the site will be covered with impervious surface which includes buildings and road improvements. All lots will be restricted to 2500square feet maximum impervious area per the conceptual drainage plan. Lawn and other grass areas (wetland & buffers) make up approximately 45% of the remaining areas. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion or other impacts to 2. Air the earth, if any: A temporary erosion control plan and numerous pre-construction meetings prior to any on-site construction activity will ensure all potential site issues will be dealt with on site. All approved construction plans will be approved prior to any construction and elements of those plans will address erosion control & any other site development impacts. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke, greenhouse gases) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known? Normal auto emissions and dust associated with road development and house construction is anticipated. Following construction there would be normal auto emissions associated with detached single family residential use houses/vehicles. These are acceptable emissions that were deemed appropriate per the KC Comprehensive Plan & Adopted Zoning density. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? D Yes [8J No If so, generally describe. NIA LakesideSEPAChecklistFORM lc-ckl-SEPA.pdf 10/12/2007 Evaluation for Agency Use Onlv Page5of19 To be completed by applicant c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, salt water, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? D Yes 0 No If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. N/A 2. Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? D Yes 0 No If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NIA 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None LakesideSEPAChecklistFORM lc-ckl-SEPA.pdf 10/12/2007 Evaluation for Agency Use Onlv P'age 6 of 19 To be completed by applicant 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? D Yes IZI No Give general description, purpose and approximate quantities if known. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? D Yes IZI No If so, note location on the site plan. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? D Yes 1Z! No If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. N/A b. Ground 1. Will groundwater be withdrawn or will water be discharged to groundwater? D Yes IZ! No Give general description, purpose and approximate quantities if known. N/A 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (i.e., domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals: ... ; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans expected to be served by the system or systems. None LakesideSEPAChecklistFORM lc-ckl-SEPA.pdf 10/12/2007 Evaluation for Agency Use Only P'age 7 of 19 To be completed by applicant c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any. Include quantities, if known. Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The applicant has provided a detailed Level 1 Drainage Analysis and Conceptual Drainage plan. This plan calls out a stormwater detention/wetvault treatment with dispersion into a rock pad near or in the Type 4 wetland buffer. All roof runoff will be routed through perforatred stubouts prior to entering the road conveyance system. These stormwater drainage facilities are in accordance with the KC Surface Water Design Manual and KC's Critical Areas Ordinance. Additionally, this matches the pre-development drainage pattern. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? D Yes lz<;J No If so, generally describe. · N/A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff water impacts, if any: The drainage measures are in accordance with K C's current Surface Water Management Design Manual. All constuction for site development facilities (roads, drainage and eventual house foundations) will require apporved plans piror to any construction. Included with the proposal is a Conceptual Drainage Plan which calls out planned drainage facilities and limitations/restrictions. Additionally, prior to any construction a pre- construction meeting will take place on site. Approved plans will include a Temporary Erosion Control Plan to deal with run-off during construction. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: 1:8:1 Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other D Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other D Shrubs 1:8:1 Grass D Pasture D 1:8:1 Crop or grain Wet soil plants: other cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, D D Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other ---------------------- LakesideSEPAChecklistFORM lc-ckl-SEPA.pdf 10/12/2007 Evaluation for Agency Use Onlv Page 8 of 19 To be completed by applicant b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The existing grasses ( outside the wetland and buffer) in the central portion of the site will be removed due to regrading. Apporximately -85% of the site vegetation will be removed. All effort will be made to save existing perimeter trees where feasible. All lots will be re-grassed areas/lawns outside the 2500 square foot impervious limitations for houses, driveways and patios. Landscaping will be required with KC street requirements. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NIA d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: All perimeter trees will be preserved where feasible and any landscaping provided will emphasize native plants if possible. Street landscaping for required street trees will be in accordance with the KC Road Standards. 5. Animals a. Check or circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site: ~ Birds: hawk, heron, eagl~ther D Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other D Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NIA c. Is the site part of a migration route? D Yes 12s1No If so, explain. N/A LakesideSEPAChecklistFORM lc-ckl-SEPA.pdf 10/12/2007 Evaluation for Ageni~y Use Orilv IF'age 9 of 19 To be completed by applicant d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NIA 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Either electric or natural gas energy sources will be used for heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? 0 Yes l2sl No If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Unknown, as the project developes conservation features will be evaluated for use in house construction. LakesideSEPAChecklstFORM lc-ckJ.SEPA.pdf 10/12/2007 Evaluation for Agency Use OnlY ~ ..=;,.ge10of To be completed by applicant 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? D Yes IZ] No If so, describe. NIA 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: NIA b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (i.e., traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Typical noise associated with urban development -traffic and neighboring school. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (i.e., traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term site development construction noise and then typical urban noises associated with long term housing developments -pretty minimal due to only 7 lots/houses being proposed. Hours of site construction are limited by KC Health Department codes. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: LakesideSEPAChecklistFORM The applicant's goal is to finish site construction as quickly as possible so that impacts from noise are reduced in length. All constuction activity will be coordinated to reduce equipment time on the site as much as possible. Construction activity/hours will be in accordance with KC Health Department regulations. lc-ckl-SEPA.pdf 10/12/2007 Eval1Jation for Agency Use Onlv =--~ge 11 of19 To be completed by applicant 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Single family residences surround the site except on the south side where Benson HIii Elementary School is located. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? D Yes 1:8:1 No If so, describe. N/A c. Describe any structures on the site. A single family residence and detached garage. d. Will any structures be demolished? r8J Yes D No If so, what? Both the house and detached garage will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R-8 f. What is the current Comprehensive Plan designation of the site? um/urban medium density g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? NIA LakesideSEPAChecklistFORM lc-ckl-SEPA.pdf 10/12/2007 Evaluation for Agency Use onlv ,-~ge 12 of 19 To be completed by applicant h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? ~ Yes D No Is so, specify. A small issolated Type 4 wetland is in the extreme northwest corner of the site. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 18 people ( average 2.5 people for 7 lots) j. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NIA k. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The density & land use for this short plat are in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and current zoning. The lot areas are well over the minimum required for buildable lots and the site fronts a street arterial for beneficial traffic circulation. Additionally, the site plan includes a recreation tract,over 11,000 square feet (combined wlstormwater vault). 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. Seven detached residential housing units will be provided and it is anticipated that these will be middle income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. One existing single family detached home will be demolished, however it's being replaced due to 7 new houses being proposed. LakesideSEPAChecklistFORM lc-ckl-SEPA.pdf 10/12/2007 Evaluati.on for Agencv Use Onlv ~ge 13 of 19 To be completed by applicant c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: The applicant is trying to coordinate and hold down site construction costs as much as possible. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure or structures, not including antennas? What is the principal exterior building material or materials proposed? Building plans are not done at this time. However, zoning code limits the building height to 35-45ft base height. It is anticipated that exterior bulding material will be wood or a recyclable type material that resembles wood surface. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Landscaping and street trees will be provided and all new sturctures/housing will benefit the immediate area aesthetically. Perimeter trees will be retained where feasible. 11. Light and glare a. What type of light and glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Those typical with residential housing. A street light will be required at the short plat entrance road where it intersects 116'" Avenue SE and on the internal street where required by code. This is a small residential project and light and glare is anticipated to be minimal. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? D Yes cgJ No If yes, explain: N/A LakesideSEPAChecklistFORM lc-ckl-SEPA. pdf 10/12/2007 Evaluation for Agency Use Onlv age 14 of 19 To be completed by applicant c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None are anticipated d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are none in the immediate area. Adjacent to the site is the Benson HIii Elementary School which has playgroung equipment and playfields. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? D Yes [gj No If so, describe. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, in any: The applicant is providing an onsite recreation tract that is over 11,000square feet (combined with a stormwater detention wetvault) in size. This provides private recreation space for the eventual 7 families/houses. LakesideSEPAChecklistFORM lc-ckl-SEPA.pdf 10/12/2007 Evaluation for Agenicy Use Only , ..age 15 of 19 To be completed by applicant 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, the national state or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? D Yes [8J No If so, generally describe. NIA b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NIA 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The proposal has direct access to 116th Avenue SE which is a fully constructed secondary arterial via an onsite access road. This short access road will terminate with a temporary cul-de-sac near the sites west property line. The entrance onto 116th Avenue SE aligns with an approved entrance on the east side of 116th Avenue SE. Consequently there will be no offset intersections involved with the construction of this site. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? D Yes [8J No If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The nearest bus stop is approximately .5 miles west of the site at 108th Avenue SE & SE 186th Street. A second bus stoJil option is approximately . 7 miles to the north at 116th Avenue SE & SE 176 Street. Additionally, a Metro transit station is located in downtown Renton and a Metro park and ride lot is located on Grady Way a few blocks west of Rainier Avenue. LakesideSEPAChecklistFORM lc-ckl-SEPA.pdf 10/12/2007 Evaluation for Agency Use Onlv ,_ge16of19 To be completed by applicant c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The proposed 7 lots will have two parking spaces per lot for a total of 14 spaces. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? r:8:1 Yes D No If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The frontage along 116'" Avenue SE will be improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk. The access to the proposed 7 new lots will be served internally by a new road with curb, gutter and sidewalk. It has not been determined at this time if the internal road will be a public or private road -the actual determination will be made during the engineering plan review and/or as determined by the short plat conditions. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail or air transportation? D Yes r:8:1 No If so, generally describe. N/A f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Using 1 O trips per day per lot the anticipated trips per day would be 70. It is anticipated that normal morning (6-Bam) and evening (4-6pm) peak hour times would contain the peak volume of cars. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, in any: The applicant will have one access point to the frontage arterial which aligns with an existing intersection. Therefore the proposal negates additional confiict points which impeed traffic along 116yh Avenue SE. Additionally, the Roads MPS Zone fee is $3362 per lot (year 2007 fee) which will be a condition of preliminary approval. This fee goes to traffic improvements in this area (Zone 341) which helps mitigate traffic impacts from this proposal. LakesideSEPAChecklistFORM lc-ckl-SEPA.pdf 10/12/2007 Evaluaition for Agency Use Onlv \a;;age 17 of 19 rro be completed by applicant 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (i.e., fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? C8J Yes O No If so, generally describe. Yes, but only in proportion to seven new lots. Fire District 40 has reviewed the short plat as well as the Renton Schoo/ District -taxes and levies pay appropriate amounts per future house evaluation and districts involved. Again, the County's zoning and comprehensive plan have deemed this level of development (7-lots) as appropriate for this area. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: See a. above 16. Utilities a. Check utilities currently available at the site: 181 Electricity 181 Natural gas 181 Water 181 Refuse service 181 Telephone 181 Sanitary sewer 0 Septic system 0 Other: ---------------~---- b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for tne project, tl'/Uti/ity providing the service and the general const111ction acti~ on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be reeded. Full urban facilities are available to the site. Water and S.Wf:1 ilability cetificates have been obtained from Soos Creet W & S [istnc SE provides power and Qwest provides phone serice. :PAChecldistFORM lc-cld-SEPA.pdf 10/12/2007 Evaluation for Agency Use Onl _ ~ge18of19 C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. 7 Date submitted Check out the DDES Web site at www.kinqcounty.gov/permits LakesideSEPAChecklistFORM lc-d<I-SEPA.pdf 10/12/2007 age 19 of 19